Agenda packet — Lincoln City Council, January 13, 2026 (part 1 of 4)

2026 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT

SUCCESSOR AGENCY / LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
January 13, 2026

CITY OF LINCOLN
2026 REGULAR MEETING - CITY COUNCIL /

LINCOLN REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
/ LINCOLN PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
January 13, 2026

AS A COURTESY, PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES & ELECTRONIC DEVICES DURING THE MEETING -COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA-
6:00 PM
Mayor Richard Pearl
Mayor Pro Tem Whitney Eklund Councilmember Holly Andreatta Councilmember Ben Brown Councilmember John Reedy City Hall (Extremely Limited Seating Capacity)
3rd Floor Council Chambers
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
or attend via
ZOOM
register by using this link:
https://us06web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_BuE0s3EcQD-zsbFvqIr9eQ or participate by calling US: +1 (669) 900-6833
use ID #867 6709 0429
and use *9 to raise hand to speak
600 Sixth Street
◆
Lincoln, CA 95648
◆

www.lincolnca.gov

◆
916-434-2400 1

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PUBLIC COMMENT ON CLOSED SESSION *In person only.

EXECUTIVE TEAM

Sean Scully, City Manager
Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney
Nita Wracker, Asst. City Manager / Finance Director
Matt Alves, Police Chief
Jennifer Brown, Chief Innovation & Tech. Officer
Vin Cay, City Engineer
Erin Frye, Econ. Dev. & Communication Specialist
Kathryn Hunt, Library Services Director
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
Matthew Medill, Public Works Director
Veronica Rodriguez, Human Resources Director
Anthony Mejia, Fire Chief
MISSION STATEMENT:

To provide the highest level of service responsive to our community’s expectations and to enhance the quality of life and economic vitality.

THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED TO ASSIST WITH PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA):

In compliance with the ADA, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting or other services in conjunction with this meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at (916) 434-2490. The meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available. Notification at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist City staff in assuring reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.

Agenda Availability:

The main posting location of the City Council Agenda pursuant to the Brown Act, Government Code § 54954.2(a) is on the public kiosk outside the entrance of City Hall, 600 6th Street, Lincoln, California. City Council Agenda Packets are available for review at the City Clerk’s Office, 600 6th Street, Lincoln, California, and “Live and Archived” meetings, minutes and videos are available on the City’s website at www.Lincolnca.gov. City Council Meetings are televised live 6:00PM on Cable channel 18.

Public Input:

Persons wishing to address the City Council are asked to voluntarily complete and submit a speaker card to City staff. Speaker cards are available near the entrance of the meeting location. Persons wishing to address the City Council on an item appearing on this agenda will be called upon at the appropriate time during the item’s consideration. Persons wishing to address the City Council on an item not appearing on the agenda will be called upon during “Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items.” In either case, please stand to be recognized by the Mayor when your name is called. Please note:
comments from the audience without coming to the podium may be disregarded or ruled out of order. All speakers' time will be limited to three (3) minutes, unless extended by the Mayor. All comments or questions should be addressed to the Mayor and in most cases, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, but may engage in brief discussion, provide direction to City staff, or schedule items for future meetings.

Special Meeting Public Input:

Only issues listed on a special meeting agenda may be addressed pursuant to the Brown Act’s regulation of Special Meetings.

Consent Agenda
: All matters on the Consent Agenda are considered routine business and will be enacted by one motion.

There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the City Council requests a specific item be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate action. Any items removed will be considered after the remainder of the Consent Agenda.

Judicial Review
: Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code § 65009 and/or California Public Resources Code § 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the decisions made by the City Council, including any action regarding planning, zoning or environmental decisions, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

CLOSED SESSION - 5:00pm
Conference with Labor Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6, City Designated Representative: Veronica Rodriguez, Organization: Lincoln Professional Firefighters Association

600 Sixth Street
◆
Lincoln, CA 95648
◆

www.lincolnca.gov

◆
916-434-2400 2

4. CALL TO ORDER

5. ROLL CALL

6. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

7. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION (if any)

8. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS

9. PRESENTATIONS

10. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL *
All speakers' time will be limited to three (3)
minutes, unless extended by the Mayor. All comments or questions should be addressed to the Mayor and in most cases, the City Council is prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, but may engage in brief discussion, provide direction to City staff, or schedule items for future meetings.

11. CONSENT
GENERAL SESSION - 6:00pm

INSPIRATION OR INVOCATION

11.A
Approval of Meeting Minutes of the December 9, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting. (Hope Ithurburn)

11.B
Adopt a Resolution Approving the City Council Appointments to the City of Lincoln Boards, Commissions, and Committees and the External Joint Power Agencies Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees and Receive the Local Appointment List as required by California Government Code 54970, Maddy Act. (Hope Ithurburn)

11.C
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Task Order Amendment No. 1 with Kimley-Horn for Engineering Services related to the Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation Project (CIP 692). (Roland Neufeld)

11.D
Adopt a Resolution Approving the Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2025, and Making Findings as Required by the Mitigation Fee Act. (Nita Wracker)

11.E
Adopt a Resolution for Approving the Improvement Plans and Technical Specifications, and Authorizing the Engineering Department to Proceed With Bidding the Project for Construction for the Water Rehabilitation FY 23/24 (CIP 654). (Jacob Groeser)

11.F
Adopt A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Task Order for Professional Services With R.E.Y Engineers, Inc. In The Amount Of $336,163 For the Design of K St, O St, P St & 5th St Water Rehabilitation Capital Improvement Project (CIP 713). (Jonnelyn Espartero)

11.G
Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Task Order with DKS Associates for Professional Engineering Services in the Amount of $125,000 for the Bikeways Master Plan 2026 Update Project. (Jonnelyn Espartero) 600 Sixth Street
◆
Lincoln, CA 95648
◆

www.lincolnca.gov

◆
916-434-2400 3

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS

13. GENERAL BUSINESS

14. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

15. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS

16. COMMITTEE REPORTS

17. INFORMATION ITEMS

18. ADJOURNMENT

11.H
Adopt a Resolution Approving the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(I) for the Period of July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. (Nita Wracker)

12.A
Waive Full Reading and Introduce an Ordinance by Title Only, Regulating Electric Mobility Devices and further finding the Ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Kristine Mollenkopf)

12.B
Waive Full Reading and Introduce an Ordinance by Title Only, Repealing Chapter

5.40 of the Municipal Code, entitled "Fortune Telling and Occult Arts". (Kristine Mollenkopf)

NOTE:

Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Council/Redevelopment Successor Agency after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk's office at 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln, CA during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City of Lincoln's website at
https://www.lincolnca.gov/
subject to staff's availability to
post the documents before the meeting.

In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, the City will provide special assistance for disabled members of the public. The meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available. If you have a disability and need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in the meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Office at (916) 434-2490. As a courtesy, please make every effort to inform the Clerk of your needs at least 24 hours prior to the meeting so the City may make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

Pursuant to applicable laws and regulations, including without limitation, California Government Code Section 65009 and/or California Public Resources Code Section 21177, if you wish to challenge in court any of the above decisions (including any action regarding planning, zoning and/or environmental decisions), you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice/agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Levine Act Provisions --
The Levine Act requires a party (or the party's agent(s)) to a proceeding before the City of Lincoln that involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contribution made to City elected or appointed officer totaling more than $500 within the 12 months before the City decision. This includes contributions to Councilmembers, Planning Commissioners and members of other City boards and commissions.
600 Sixth Street
◆
Lincoln, CA 95648
◆

www.lincolnca.gov

◆
916-434-2400 4
SUBJECT:

Conference with Labor Negotiator Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6, City Designated Representative:

Veronica Rodriguez, Organization: Lincoln Professional
Firefighters Association
SUBMITTED BY:

City Clerk
DEPARTMENT:

Human Resources
DATE:

January 13, 2026

STAFF REPORT
5 SUBJECT:

Approval of Meeting Minutes of the December 9, 2025 Regular City Council Meeting. (Hope Ithurburn)
SUBMITTED BY:

City Clerk
DEPARTMENT:

City Manager's Office
DATE:

January 13, 2026

Item Number 11.A

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

ATTACHMENTS:

DRAFT - MEETING MINUTES, 12.9.25.docx

STAFF REPORT
6 MINUTES

CITY OF LINCOLN CITY COUNCIL,

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY
and REDEVELOPMENT SUCCESSOR AGENCY
Regular Meeting
December 9, 2025

GENERAL SESSION
The meeting was conducted in person at City Hall, 600 6 th Street, Lincoln, CA, and virtually on Zoom with a Live Stream on the City of Lincoln YouTube Channel and WAVE Channel 18.

1. CALL TO ORDER by Mayor Andreatta at 6:18 PM.

2. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers present: Mayor Holly Andreatta Ben Brown
Whitney Eklund
Richard Pearl
John Reedy

3. REPORT FROM CLOSED SESSION (if any) – none.

4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – led by Will Foote.

5. SUCCESSION OF MAYOR AND VICE MAYOR/OATHS OF OFFICE

Mayor Andreatta provided comments and expressed gratitude

Mayor Pro Tem Brown provided comments. Mayor Andreatta opened the discussion to public comment with there being no public comment.

Mayor Pro Tem Brown motioned to appoint Richard Pearl as Mayor for 2026, motion was seconded by Mayor Andreatta. Passed by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Andreatta, Brown, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

Councilmember Reedy motioned to appoint Whitney Eklund Mayor Pro Tem for 2026, motion was seconded by Mayor Andreatta. Passed by the following roll call vote:

Ayes: Andreatta, Brown, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

City Manager Scully expressed gratitude to outgoing Mayor Andretta and presented a gift with a commemorative video was presented in honor of Mayor Andreatta. Mayor Andreatta expressed gratitude to her family, fellow elected officials, the community, and staff.

Mayor Pearl expressed gratitude to his family and sentiments of looking forward to a successful year with Mayor Pro Tem Eklund providing comments expressing gratitude to the former Mayor and also looking forward to a successful year and team.

6. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS – None.

Page 2 of 5 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

7. PRESENTATIONS

7.A Update from Western Placer Unified School District (WPUSD) Superintendent Kerrie Callahan.

Superintendent Kerrie Callahan with WPUSD presented to Council with a brief discussion following. Mayor Pearl opened the discussion regarding the agenda item with no public comment.

8. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDA ITEMS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER

JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL

The following provided public comment:

Fran Neves, Lincoln resident
Stan Nader, Lincoln resident
Jason Daggett, Lincoln resident

Staff responded to comments. Seeing no further public comments, Mayor Pearl closed public comment.

9. CONSENT

Mayor Pearl asked if any members of the City Council or staff would like to pull any items from the consent agenda; none were pulled.

9.A Approval of Meeting Minutes of November 18, 2025, Regular City Council meeting.

9.B Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-175 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a 5-year Contract for Services with Azteca Systems, LLC, Cityworks for Software for Public Works for a Total Amount Not-to-Exceed $667,200.

9.C Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-176 Accepting the Summary Vacation of Landscape Easement, Ferrari Pavilion Parcel Map and the Frontage Improvement Plans (Ferrari Pavilion Project).

9.D Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-177 Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into a Three-Year Contract with Foothill Vegetation Management for Trail Maintenance Services Ending June 30, 2028, in an Amount not to Exceed $361,446.

9.E Filing of Fiscal Year 2025-26 Annual Reports for the City's Maintenance Community Facilities Districts.

9.F Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-178 Accepting the Twelve Bridges Village 3A Subdivision Improvements as Complete and Authorize the City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder.

Page 3 of 5 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

9.G Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-179 Accepting the Twelve Bridges Village 3B Subdivision Improvements as Complete and Authorize the City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder.

9.H Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-180 Accepting the Magnolia Village Subdivision Improvements as Complete and Authorize the City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder.

9.I Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-181 Accepting the Fuel Farm Pollution Control System Project (CIP 486) as Complete and Authorize the City Clerk to File the Notice of Completion with the Placer County Recorder.

9.J Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-182 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Task Order Amendment No. 1 with R.E.Y. Engineers Inc. in the Amount of $48,323 for the Brentford Circle Trail Crossings Project.

Seeing no public comments, Mayor Pearl called for a motion of approval for the items.

Councilmember Reedy motioned to approve, motion was seconded by Councilmember Andreatta. Passed by the following voice vote:

Ayes: Andreatta, Brown, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

10. PUBLIC HEARINGS – None.

11. GENERAL BUSINESS

11.A Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-183 (with revisions noted by Council) Allocating Remaining ARPA Funds to the Downtown Lincoln Association (DLA) to Support Downtown Beautification Efforts.

City Manager Scully made the presentation to council. Mayor Pearl opened the discussion regarding the agenda item. The following provided public comment:

Randy, Downtown Lincoln Association

11.B Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-184 (with revisions noted by Council) Allocating Remaining ARPA Funds to the Placer County Conservation Program (PCCP) Valley Land Conversion Fees and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an MOU.

City Manager Scully made the presentation to council. Mayor Pearl opened the discussion regarding the agenda item. There was no public comment.

Seeing no further public comments, Mayor Pearl called for a motion of approval for both Agenda Item 11.A and 11.B. Councilmember Andreatta motioned to approve, motion was seconded by Councilmember Brown. Passed by the following voice vote:
9

Page 4 of 5 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

Ayes: Andreatta, Brown, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

11.C Adopt RESOLUTION 2025-185 (with typographical corrections as noted) Approving New Street Intersection Names of Five (5) Unnamed Existing Driveways along Lincoln Boulevard, Sterling Parkway, and E. Joiner Parkway as Recommended by the Theme and Naming Committee (TANC).

Nita Wracker presented to Council. Mayor Pearl opened the discussion regarding the agenda item. There was no public comments.

Seeing no public comment, Mayor Pearl called for a motion of approval of the agenda item.

Councilmember Andreatta motioned to approve, motion was seconded by Councilmember Reedy. Passed by the following voice vote:

Ayes: Andreatta, Brown, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy
Noes: None

Absent: None
Abstain: None

12. CITY MANAGER REPORTS

City Manager Scully announced upcoming City Hall holiday closures, recognized the retirements of Firefighter Cory Leighty and Firefighter Norm Kent, provided an update on upcoming agenda items to be presented to Council as well as the Water Master Plan. Manager Scully also promoted the upcoming skate park ribbon cutting event and wished all Happy Holidays!

13. COUNCIL INITIATED BUSINESS

Councilmember Reedy requested Council review the Lincoln Municipal Code in relation to the City’s various committees focusing on the composition and other operational procedures and standardize as appropriate.

14. COMMITTEE REPORTS

Andreatta reported on a recently attended Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) committee meeting. Mayor Pro Tem Eklund commented on the recent Christmas parade, reported on an upcoming Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) board meeting, and an upcoming City Economic Development Committee (EDC) meeting. Mayor Pearl reported on an upcoming City Airport committee meeting. Councilmember Brown reported on a recently attended Placer County Flood Control District board meeting.

15. INFORMATION ITEMS

Councilmember Andreatta expressed gratitude to Scott Boynton and staff for their efforts in redesigning the Christmas Parade float and commented on the festive Christmas Tree Lighting 10

Page 5 of 5 ends

City Council, Public Finance Authority and
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

event and promoted the upcoming Chabad Jewish Center of Lincoln’s grand opening event.

Councilmember Andreatta and Mayor Pro Tem Eklund respond to earlier public comments regarding commercial tenants.

After comments from Council, a video of the recent Christmas parade and Tree Lighting event was played.

16. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Pearl adjourned the meeting at 7:48pm.

Respectfully submitted by Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

________________________________________
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
11 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Approving the City Council Appointments to the City of Lincoln Boards, Commissions, and Committees and the External Joint Power Agencies Regional Boards,
Commissions, and Committees and Receive the Local
Appointment List as required by California Government Code 54970, Maddy Act. (Hope Ithurburn)
SUBMITTED BY:

City Clerk
DEPARTMENT:

City Manager's Office
DATE:

January 13, 2026

Item Number 11.B

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the City Council appointments to the City of Lincoln boards, commissions, and committees and the external joint power agencies, regional boards, and committees and receiving Local Appointment List as required by California Government Code 54970, Maddy Act .

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

Each December the City of Lincoln Mayor rotates and the incoming Mayor creates a list of City and regional appointments for Councilmembers. The action before the City Council is to approve the recommendations made by City Council for City Committees and by Mayor Pearl for Regional Boards, Commissions, and Committees.

Additionally, Government Code Section 54970, known as the Maddy Act, requires the City Council to annually, by December 31st of each year, prepare a list of all regular and ongoing boards, commissions and committees, which are appointed by the City Council of the City of Lincoln, with the name of the incumbent appointee, the date of the appointment, the date the term expires and the necessary qualifications of the positions.

The Maddy Act also requires this list to be posted at the public library and be available to members of the public.

ATTACHMENTS:

RESO - List of appointments, 2026.docx
2026 - List of Regional Appointments.docx

STAFF REPORT
12 List of Appointments, REVISED 11.20.2025.docx
13 Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN MAKING

CHANGES TO THE APPOINTMENTS OF VARIOUS INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL

JOINT POWER AGENCIES,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES, STANDING COMMITTEES AND

AD HOC COMMITTEES
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. The Mayor of the City of Lincoln, with the consent of the City Council of the City of Lincoln does hereby appoint the individuals named in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to various City of Lincoln committees as well as external joint power agencies, regional boards/committees, standing and ad hoc committees.

Section 2. The Mayor of the City of Lincoln, with the consent of the City Council of the City of Lincoln does hereby direct staff to post the Local Appointments List in compliance with Government Code Section 54970, the Maddy Act.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

14 CITY COUNCIL
2026 Regional/City Board, Commission, and Committee Assignments

Page 1 of 2 ends

* = Mayoral Appointment
UPDATED 1.13.2026
REGIONAL Board/Commission/Committee Appointment Stipend Air Pollution Control District
(Placer County)
Richard Pearl (Mayor)
Whitney Eklund (Alt)
None
Borders Committee (Lincoln/Rocklin/Roseville)* Richard Pearl (Mayor) None City Select Committee* Richard Pearl (Mayor) None
Economic Development Board
(Placer County)
John Reedy
Whitney Eklund (Alt)
None
Flood Control & Water Conservation District Board
(Placer County)
Ben Brown
Richard Pearl (Mayor) (Alt)
$100/meeting
Greater Sacramento Economic Council* Holly Andreatta
STAFF (Alt)
None
Lincoln–Sewer Maintenance District 1 Wastewater Authority (LiSWA) Holly Andreatta John Reedy
Richard Pearl (Mayor) (Alt)
None
Lincoln Titan 1-A Missile Restoration Advisory Board Richard Pearl (Mayor) Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) Whitney Eklund $150/meeting Municipal Advisory Council (MAC) – Lincoln
(Placer County)
Holly Andreatta
Whitney Eklund (Alt)
None
Municipal Advisory Council (MAC) – Sheridan
(Placer County)
Holly Andreatta
Whitney Eklund (Alt)
None
Nevada Irrigation District (NID) John Reedy
STAFF (Alt)
None
Pioneer Community Energy Richard Pearl (Mayor)
John Reedy (Alt)
None
Placer Conservation Authority John Reedy
Richard Pearl (Mayor) (Alt)
None
Placer County Transportation Planning Agency/South Placer Regional Transportation Authority
Ben Brown
Holly Andreatta (Alt)
$100/meeting
Placer Mosquito Vector Control District Peter Gilbert $100/meeting 15 CITY COUNCIL
2026 Regional/City Board, Commission, and Committee Assignments

Page 2 of 2 ends

* = Mayoral Appointment
UPDATED 1.13.2026
Placer County Water Agency (PCWA) Richard Pearl (Mayor) Whitney Eklund
None
Regional Water Authority Board Whitney Eklund
STAFF (Alt)
None
Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Holly Andreatta Ben Brown (Alt)
$100/meeting
Western Placer Waste Management Authority Board John Reedy Whitney Eklund (Alt)
$100/meeting

CITY Board/Commission/Committee Appointment
Airport Committee Richard Pearl (Mayor)
Whitney Eklund
Economic Development Committee Whitney Eklund
John Reedy
Library Advisory Board Richard Pearl (Mayor)
Whitney Eklund
Parks & Recreation Committee John Reedy
Holly Andreatta (Alt)

Page 1 of 3 ends

REVISED 11/20/2025

CITY OF LINCOLN: LOCAL APPOINTMENTS & ELIGIBILITY LIST
(Govt. Code Section 54972)

Airport Committee (5 members) Appointment Date: Term: Term Expires:

Richard Pearl, Councilmember 1/14/2025
Whitney Eklund, Councilmember 1/14/2025
Sean Scully, City Manager
Byron Maynard 02/09/2021 1st - eligible 12/2026
VACANT 12/2026
Lisa McArdle 01/24/2023 1st - eligible 12/2026
Bob Cooperrider 1/14/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028
Clara Ellis 3/25/2025 1st eligible 12/2028
Economic Development Committee (9 members) Appointment Date: Term: Term Expires:

Whitney Eklund, Councilmember 1/14/2025 N/A N/A
John Reedy, Councilmember 1/14/2025 N/A N/A
Sean Scully, City Manager January, 2022 N/A N/A
Erin Frye, Economic Development /Communications
Specialist

N/A N/A N/A
Faraz Mahmood 01/14/2025 1st – eligible 12/2028
Andrea Faria 01/14/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028
VACANT 12/2028
VACANT 12/2028
Jason Price 02/12/2019 2nd - eligible 12/2026
David Riccitiello 04/26/2022 2nd - eligible 12/2026
Melanie Borchardt 01/24/2023 1st - eligible 12/2026
Joann Hilton, Chair 01/24/2023 1st - eligible 12/2026
VACANT 12/2026

Page 2 of 3 ends

REVISED 11/20/2025

Fiscal & Investments Oversight Committee (7 members) Appointment Date: Term: Term Expires:

Greg Kevin, City Treasurer 1/14/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028 Kim Tucker-Knotts 1/14/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028
Clark Osterhout 1/14/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028
Ron Dolinsek 04/26/2022 2nd – eligible 12/2028
Mary Wilshire 01/24/2023 1st - eligible 12/2026
Lisa Jackson 1/14/2025 2nd - eligible 12/2028
George Sittner 5/14/2024 1st - eligible 12/2026
Library Advisory Board (6 members) Appointment Date: Term: Term Expires:

Richard Pearl, Councilmember 1/14/2025 N/A N/A
Whitney Eklund, Councilmember 1/14/2025 N/A N/A
Joanne Schumacher 1/14/2025 2nd - eligible 12/2028
Lynn Snyder 1/14/2025 2nd - eligible 12/2028
David Villegas 1/14/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028
Gloria Pilotti-Irey 02/12/2019 2nd - eligible 12/2026
Neil Cochran 01/24/2023 1st - eligible 12/2026
Jeff Serpa 01/24/2023 1st - eligible 12/2026
Library Advisory Committee (15 members) Appointment Date: Term: Term Expires:

Joanne Schumacher 1/14/2025 2nd - eligible 12/2028
Lynne Snyder 1/14/2025 2nd - eligible 12/2028
David Villegas 1/14/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028
Gloria Pilotti-Irey 02/12/2019 2nd - eligible 12/2026
Neil Cochran 01/24/2023 1st - eligible 12/2026
Jeff Serpa 01/24/2023 1st - eligible 12/2026
George Dykstra, WPUSD 01/2023 N/A N/A
Jason Price, WPUSD 01/2023 N/A N/A
Jennifer Hladun, WPUSD 10/2021 N/A N/A
Diane Mahan, WPUSD 10/2021 N/A N/A
Heather Pierce, WPUSD 2022 N/A N/A
Carolyn Norman, Sierra College 2022 N/A N/A
Barbara Vineyard, Sierra College 2007 N/A N/A
18

Page 3 of 3 ends

REVISED 11/20/2025
Vacant, Sierra College N/A N/A N/A
Vacant, Sierra College N/A N/A N/A
Vacant, Sierra College N/A N/A N/A
Parks & Recreation Committee (9 members) Appointment Date: Term: Term Expires:

John Reedy (Councilmember, non-voting) 1/14/2025 N/A N/A Holly Andreatta (Mayor, non-voting – alternate) 1/14/2025 N/A N/A Joel Slaughter 1/14/2025 2nd - eligible 12/2028
Steven Ernst 01/14/2025 2nd - eligible 12/2028
Matt Lundgren 01/14/2025 2nd - eligible 12/2028
Tawny Dotson 1/14/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028
Joey Zaokopny 1/14/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028
Dave Fear 06/13/2017 3rd - eligible 12/2026
David Villegas 1/14/2025 1st – eligible 12/2026
John Pineschi 01/24/2023 1st – eligible 12/2026
Amy Ridgway 01/24/2023 1st – eligible 12/2026
Planning Commission (7 members) Appointment Date: Term: Term Expires:

Peter Gilbert 1/14/2025 2nd – eligible 12/2028
Michele Hutchinson 1/14/2025 3rd - eligible 12/2026
Timothy Jackson 3/25/2025 1st - eligible 12/2028
Eric Johnson 01/10/2023 3rd - eligible 12/2026
Nathan Herzog 1/14/2025 1st – eligible 12/2028
Jerry Johnson 01/14/2025 2nd – eligible 12/2028
Tony Manning 1/14/2025 1st – eligible 12/2026

19 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Task Order Amendment No. 1 with Kimley-Horn for
Engineering Services related to the Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation Project
(CIP 692). (Roland Neufeld)
SUBMITTED BY:

Roland Neufeld
DEPARTMENT:

Engineering
DATE:

January 13, 2026

Item Number 11.C

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Task Order Amendment No. 1 with Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $20,000 for professional engineering services for the Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation Project. The total revised Task Order would equal $217,000.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The Fiscal Year 2025/26 budget includes $800,000 for engineering services related to the Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation Project, CIP 692.

The Public Facilities Element has identified the following intersections as City funded projects that will be upgraded to signalized intersections in order to maintain an acceptable level of service: East Avenue/7 th
Street, East Avenue/12
th
Street, East Avenue/10
th
Street, 12
th
Street/McCourtney Road, Ferrari Ranch
Road/Caledon Circle (west), Ferrari Ranch Road/Sorrento Parkway, Nicolaus Road/Lakeside Drive, and McBean Park Drive/D Street.

The Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation Project will provide the necessary traffic analysis to determine if traffic signals are, or will soon be, warranted at the aforementioned intersections. The traffic analysis will also compare the pros and cons of installing traffic signal control versus roundabout control at the eight listed intersections, as outlined in the project description. The findings of the traffic analysis will inform a prioritization list for design and construction. The final design for the highest priority location(s) will be accomplished under a separate contract in the future.

On August 26, 2025 City Council awarded a Task Order to Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $197,000 for the necessary engineering services.

STAFF REPORT
20 FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

Staff have since received concerns from several residents about traffic delays during peak hours at the intersection of Nicolaus Road and Nelson Lane/Aviation Boulevard. Additionally, a new commercial development application has been submitted to the City for review at the intersection of Nelson Lane and State Route 65 that could potentially have a significant impact on traffic flow at the nearby intersection of Nicolaus Road and Nelson Lane/Aviation Boulevard. As such, staff determined that it would be prudent to include the Nicolaus Road and Nelson Lane/Aviation Boulevard intersection in the Traffic Signal Analysis project.

Staff requested a scope and fee from Kimley-Horn for the additional engineering services required to add the additional intersection to the project.

A Task-Order amendment for the additional engineering services was provided by Kimley-Horn in the amount of
$
20,000, which was determined to be acceptable given the nature of the work required. Task Order Amendment No. 1 can be found in Attachment A.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The Task Order with Kimley-Horn only includes scope to analyze and rank potential future projects and therefore is not subject to environmental regulations. A future Task Order for project specific engineering design will include scope to comply with any required environmental elements needed for the project.

LEVINE ACT COMPLIANCE:

The Levine Act requires a party (or the party’s agent(s)) to a proceeding before the City of Lincoln that involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contribution made to City elected or appointed officer totaling more than $250 within the 12 months before the City decision.

This matter does not implicate the disclosure requirements of the Levine Act.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project is an approved Capital Improvement Project for the biennium fiscal year 2025/26, funded from the Transportation Public Facilities Element (PFE) Fund.

The project is funded as follows:

Fund 2400 - Transportation PFE Fund $800,000 Total Project Funding $800,000

Project Expenses are as follows:

Engineering Task Order (Kimley-Horn) ($197,000) Task Order Amendment No. 1 (Kimley-Horn) ($20,000) Total Project Expenses ($217,000)

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachemnt A - Task Order Amendment No. 1.pdf
21 Attachment_B_-_Resolution__1_ (1).doc
22 1011209.1 13583.008 Revised by City 6.11.13

AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
TASK ORDER Dated 8/26/2025
WITH
Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc.

The Task Order dated August 26, 2025, with Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. for engineering design of the Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation Project (CIP 6 92) (the “Contract”), is hereby amended as follows (the “Amendment”):

1. The term shall remain the same

2. Compensation for services shall be increased by $20,000. The total contract amount, as amended, shall not exceed $217,000.

3. Except as specifically stated in this Amendment, the C ontract shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

The amended scope of work includes data gathering for and analysis of the Nicolaus R oad intersection with Nelson Lane/Aviation Boulevard, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached to this Amendment. Executed this 13th day of January 2026 by:

CITY OF LINCOLN, CONTRACTOR,
a municipal corporation
By: _________________________
Approved by:
____________________________
______________________________ Print Name Sean Scully, City Manager Title: ________________________ Email:________________________
Dated:_______________________
______________________________
Dated APPROVED AS TO FORM

ATTEST _________________________ _____________________________ Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney

Dated:__________________________ Dated:________________________

City Accountability:

Department responsible for contract: Staff responsible for contract:

Engineering Roland Neufeld

ATTACHMENTS:
 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES (signed by Consultant/Contractor)  Current Insurance Certificate (applicable to the contract)  Detailed Scope of Work & Specifications, including hourly rates, etc.  Amount: $20,000 & Account/Fund: CIP692-804-80070-2400.  Current City Business License (required if working in Lincoln)  Copies of Quotes
23 kimley-horn.com 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300, Sacramento, California 95814 916 858 5800

December 5, 2025

Roland Neufeld
Senior Engineer
City of Lincoln
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, California 95648

Re: Task Order No. 117 (Amendment No. 1) – Intersection Evaluation and Prioritization Scope of Services and Fee Proposal
On-Call Traffic Engineering Services

Dear Roland:

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) is pleased to submit this task order amendment to the City of Lincoln (City) to add an additional intersection to our intersection evaluation and prioritization study. Our Project Understanding, Scope of Services, Schedule, and Fee Proposal are as follows.

Project Understanding
Kimley-Horn understands that the City desires to add an additional intersection to our previously authorized intersection evaluation and prioritization study per Project 692 – Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation as specified in the City’s Fiscal Years 2025-27 Budget.

Scope of Services
We will incorporate the following intersection (existing traffic control) into the previously authorized intersection evaluation and prioritization Scope of Services:

 Nelson Lane/Aviation Boulevard @ Nicolaus Road (AWSC)

This intersection will be fully incorporated in the screening, concept development, and prioritization efforts as noted in the original Task Order.

Schedule
Kimley-Horn will provide our services as noted in the Scope of Services as expeditiously as practicable to meet the mutually agreed upon schedule.

Fee and Billing
Kimley-Horn will provide the above Scope of Services on a labor fee plus expense basis not to exceed $20,000, bringing the total Task Order budget to $217,000. Labor fee will be billed according to our then-current rates. Direct reimbursable expenses such as express delivery services, fees, and other direct expenses will be billed at 1.10 times cost. An allocation charge of 5.0 percent will be added to the labor fee to cover certain other expenses as to these tasks such as telecommunications, in-house reproduction, postage, supplies, project related computer time, and local mileage. Administrative time related to the project may be billed hourly. All permitting, application, and similar project fees will be paid directly by the City.

If you concur with all of the foregoing and wish to direct us to proceed with the services, please provide written Notice to Proceed. Fees and times stated in this Agreement are valid for thirty (30) days after the date of this letter.

24 Roland Neufeld, December 5, 2025
Intersection Evaluation and Prioritization (Amendment No. 1), Page 2

We appreciate the opportunity to provide these services to you. Please contact me at (916) 859-3617 or [email protected] if you have any questions or require additional information.

Very truly yours,

KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Matthew D. Weir, PE, TE, PTOE, RSP
1 Senior Vice President
PE No. C70216 & TR2424

25 Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION 2026 - XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE TASK ORDER
AMENDMENT NO. 1 WITH KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR

ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS &
IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT (CIP 692) IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000

WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget includes $ 800,000 for CIP 692: Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation Project; and

WHEREAS, the project is funded by Fund 240 0: Transportation PFE funds; and

WHEREAS, eight intersections a s described in the City of Lincoln Public Facilities Element (PFE) are anticipated to require conversion to traffic signal control and are to be funded by the City: East Avenue/7 th Street, East Avenue/12th Street, East Avenue/10 th Street, 12 th Street/McCourtney Road, Ferrari Ranch Road/Caledon Circle (west), Ferrari Ranch Road/Sorrento Parkway, Nicolaus Road/Lakeside Drive, and McBean Park Drive/D Street; and

WHEREAS, the Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation Project will provide the necessary traffic analysis to determine if traffic signals are, or will soon be, warranted at the eight intersections; and

WHEREAS, the project will also compare the benefits of a traffic signal against the benefits of a roundabout at the eight listed intersections; and

WHEREAS, the findings of the analysis will inform a prioritization list for design and construction; and

WHEREAS, the final engineering design of the highest priority location(s) will be accomplished under a separate contract at a later time; and

WHEREAS, on August 26, 2025 City Council awarded a Task Order to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $197,000 to provide the required engineering analysis under their traffic engineering on -call contract with the City of Lincoln; and

WHEREAS, staff have since received concerns from several residents about traffic delays during peak hours at the intersection of Nicolaus Road and Nelson Lane/Aviation Boulevard; and

WHEREAS, a new commercial development application has been submitted to the City for review at the intersection of Nelson Lane and State Route 65 that could potentially impact traffic flow at the nearby intersection of Nicolaus Road and Nelson Lane/Aviation Boulevard; and
26 Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 2 of 2 ends

WHEREAS, staff determined that it would be prudent to include the Nicolaus Road and Nelson Lane/Aviation Boulevard intersection in the Traffic Signal Analysis project; and

WHEREAS, staff requested a scope and fee from Kimley -Horn to add the additional intersection to the project; and

WHEREAS, a Task -Order amendment for the additional engineering services was provided by Kimley -Horn in the amount of $20,000, which was determined to be acceptable given the nature of the work required.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. That the City Council of th e City of Lincoln authorizes the City Manager to execute Task Order Amendment No. 1 with Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc. in the amount of $20,000 for the Traffic Signal Analysis & Implementation Project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

__________________________
______
Richard Pearl, Mayor

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

27 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Approving the Annual Report for the
Fiscal
Year Ending June 30, 2025, and Making Findings as Required by the Mitigation Fee Act. (Nita Wracker)
SUBMITTED BY:

Sonja Dillree
DEPARTMENT:

Finance
DATE:

January 13, 2026

Item Number 11.D

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the Council review and approves as required by AB 1600 the City’s reporting of Development Impact Fees (known as PFE Fees) collections, expenditures and anticipated expenditures as set forth in the annual report prepared by NBS Consulting in collaboration with the Finance Department for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of public facilities fees (“PFEs”), also commonly referred to in communities as development impact fees (“PFEs”). This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code §§ 66000 through 66008 (commonly referred to as the “Mitigation Fee Act”). This law went into effect on January 1,1989, and was intended to create transparency in the collection, retention and use of development impact fees.

For each separate account or fund established, the local agency is required, within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, to make available to the public certain information for the fiscal year. The annual report requirements are set forth on page 1, section 1.1 of the attached report.

Per Section 6606(b)(2), the annual report must be reviewed by the City Council at its next regularly scheduled meeting, but not less than 15 days after the statements are made public.

This meeting is the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Council. Section 66013(d) has similar requirements for capacity charges, requiring disclosure of certain information within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year. Those reporting requirements are set forth on page 2, section 1.1 of the NBS report.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

The annual report contains the information required in Section 66000 et seq. including a list of the City’s impact fee funds, current fee schedule, financial summary report, expenditures on each improvement, etc.

STAFF REPORT
28 ATTACHMENTS:

Final 1.13.26.pdf
Resolution.docx
29 CITY COUNCIL REPORT

SUBJECT: A Resolution Approving the Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 202 5, and Making Findings as Required by the Mitigation Fee Act.

SUBMITTED BY: Nita Wracker, Assistant City Manager

DEPARTMENT: Finance

DATE: January 13, 2026

STRATEGIC
RELEVANCE: Necessary Administrative Action

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the Council review and approve as required by AB 1600 the City’s reporting of Development Impact Fee s (known as PFE Fees) collections, expenditures and anticipated expenditures as set forth in the annual report prepared by NBS Consulting in collaboration with the Finance Department for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025.

BACKGROUND / INTRODUCTION:

In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of public facilities fees (“PFEs”), also commonly referred to in communities as development impact fees (“PFEs”). This legislation was passed as AB1600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code §§ 66000 through 66008 ( commonly referred to as the “Mitigation Fee Act”). This law went into effect on January 1, 1989 , and was intended to create transparency in the collection, retention and use of development impact fees.

Per Section 6606(b)(2), the annual report must be reviewed by the City Council at its next regularly scheduled meeting, but not less than 15 days after the statements are made public. This meeting is the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Council.

Section 66013(d) has similar requirements for capacity charges, requiring disclosure of certain information within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year. Those reporting requirements are set forth on page 2, section 1.1 of the NBS report.

FINDINGS / ANALYSIS:

30 POLICY COMPLIANCE:

This reporting complies with the requirements of State law, specifically, the Mitigation Fee Act, Government Code §§ 66000 through 66008.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

N/A

LEVINE ACT COMPLIANCE
The Levine Act requires a party (or the party’s agent(s)) to a proceeding before the City of Lincoln that involves any action or consideration to their contract, license, permit, or other entitlement for use, to disclose any campaign contribution made to City elected or appointed officer totaling more than $250 within the 12 months before the City decision.

This matter does not implicate the disclosure requirements of the Levine Act.

CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, s taff recommends the Council review and approve the City’s reporting of PFE collections, expenditures and anticipated expenditures as set forth in the annual and five -year report prepared by NBS Consulting in collaboration with the Finance Department for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. Decline to adopt the resolution; or

2. Provide staff with additional direction.

FISCAL IMPACT:

N/A

REPORT ACCOUNTABILITY:

This Staff Report has been reviewed by the City Attorney for legal sufficiency and by the City Manager for content.

The Finance Department has reviewed this staff report and certifies budgeted funds are available, unless a budget amendment is being requested as part of this action item.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution
Annual Development Impact Fee Report – Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 31 Resolution No. 2026--XXX

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION 2026 - ###

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2025, AND MAKING FINDINGS AS REQUIRED BY THE MITIGATION FEE ACT.

WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln’s Municipal Code requires new development to bear the cost of its increased demand/effect on municipal services and facilities so as not to create a greater burden on existing residents; and

WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln has imposed and collected development impact fees based upon several adopted nexus reports completed in accordance with Government Code § 66000, et seq.; and

WHEREAS, Section 66006(b)(2) of the Government Code requires the City to review the information concerning local agency improvement fees made available to the public at a regularly scheduled meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lincoln has reviewed and approves the Annual Development Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13TH day of January, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

32 Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025

December 17, 202 5

33 City of Lincoln

City Officials
Holly Andreatta, Mayor, District 1
Ben Brown, Mayor Pro Tem. District 2
John Reedy, Council Member, District 3
Richard Pearl, Council Member, District 4
Whitney Eklund, Council Member, District 5

Officers
Gregory E. Kevin, City Treasurer

Administrative Team
Sean Scully, City Manager
Nita Wracker, Assistant City Manager / Finance Director Kristine Mollenkopf, City Attorney
Ruthann Codina, Finance Manager
34 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Development Impact Fee Report ........................................................................ ................................................... ........................... 1

1.1 Annual Report .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Five-Year Report ............................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Impact Fees ................................................................................... ................................................... ................................... 4

2.1 Types of Impact Fees and Impact Fee Funds ................................................................................................................................... 4

2.2 Current Fee Schedule ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Financial Summary Report.............................................................................. ................................................... ............................... 7 Public Improvements .................................................................................. ................................................... .................................. 8 Interfund Loans ...................................................................................... ................................................... ..................................... 10 Refunds ........................................... ................................................... ................................................... ........................................ 11

Attachment 1 - Public Facility Element Fees schedule in effect between July 1, 2024, and August 31, 2024 Attachment 2 - Public Facility Element Fees schedule in effect between September 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025 35 City of Lincoln 1
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS

DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
The California Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Sections 66000 et seq.) mandates procedures for administration of impact fee programs, including collection and accounting, reporting, and refunds. Regarding reporting requirements, the Mitigation Fee Act requires annual reporting for each impact fee fund, and a separate five-year reporting process. This report meets the requirements described in 1.1 Annual Report, below. A combined Annual and Five-Year Report was completed in 2022 and will next be provided in 2027.

1.1 Annual Report
Section 66006 (b) (1) requires that once each year, within 180 days of the close of the fiscal year, the local agency must make available to the public the following information for each separate account established to receive impact fee revenues:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund; (report section 2)

2. The amount of the fee; (report section 2 and attachment)

3. The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund; (report section 3)

4. The amount of the fees collected and interest earned; (report section 3)

5. Identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees; (report section 4)

6. Identification of the approximate date by which the construction of a public improvement will commence, if the City determines sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing of an incomplete public improvement; An identification of each public improvement identified in a previous report and whether construction began on the approximate date noted in the previous report. For a project identified for which construction did not commence by the approximate date provided in the previous report, the reason for the delay and a revised approximate date that the local agency will commence construction; (report section 4)

7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including interest rates, repayment dates, and a description of the improvement on which the transfer or loan will be expended; (report section 5)

8. The amount of any refunds or allocations made pursuant to Section 66001, paragraphs (e) and (f); (report section 6)

The annual report must be reviewed by the City Coun cil at its next regularly scheduled public meeting, but not less than 15 days after the statements are made public, per Section 66006 (b) (2).
36 City of Lincoln 2
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS
Section 66013(d) has similar requirements for utility capacity charges in that, within 180 days after the close of each fiscal year, the local agency must make available to the public the following information:

1. A description of the charges deposited in the fund; (report section 2)

2. The beginning and ending balance of the fund and the interest earned from investment of moneys in the fund; (report section 3)

3. The amount of charges collected in that fiscal year; (report section 3)

4. An identification of:
a. Each public improvement on which charges were expended and the amount of expenditure for each improvement, including the percentage of the total cost of the public improvement that was funded with those charges if more than one source of funding was used; (report section 4) b. Each public improvement on which charges were expended that was completed during that fiscal year; (see report section 4) c. Each public improvement that is anticipated to be undertaken in the following fiscal year; (report section 4)

5. A description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the capital facilities fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned charges are or will be expended and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that the fund will receive on the loan; (report section 5)

1.2 Five-Year Report
Prior to 1996, The Mitigation Fee Act required that a local agency collecting impact fees was required to expend or commit impact fee revenue within five years or make findings to justify a continued need for the money, otherwise those funds had to be refunded. SB 1693, adopted in 1996 as an amendment to the Mitigation Fee Act, changed that requirement in material ways.

Now, Section 66001 (d) requires that, for the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit of any impact fee revenue into an account or fund as required by Section 66006 (b), and every five years thereafter, the local agency shall make all of the following findings for any fee revenue that remains unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted:

1. Identify the purpose to which the fee will be put;

2. Demonstrate the reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged;

3. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of incomplete improvements for which impact fees are to be used;

4. Designate the approximate dates on which the funding necessary to complete financing of those improvements will be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
37 City of Lincoln 3
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS
Those findings are to be made in conjunction with the annual reports discussed above. If such findings are not made as required by Section 66001, the local agency could be required to refund the moneys in the account or fund, per Section 66001 (d).

Once the agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on incomplete improvements for which impact fee revenue is to be used, it must, within 180 days of that determination, identify an approximate date by which construction of the public improvement will be commenced (Section 66001 (e)). If the agency fails to comply with that requirement, it must refund impact fee revenue in the account according to procedures specified in Section 66001 (d).
38 City of Lincoln 4
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS

CURRENT IMPACT FEES
Development impact fees in the City of Lincoln are called Public Facility Element Fees (“PFE Fees”). These fees are one-time charges levied on new development in Lincoln to fund various infrastructure, facilities, vehicles, and equipment needed to serve new development.

2.1 Types of Impact Fees and Impact Fee Funds
The fees documented in the body of this Annual Development Impact Fee Report include the following fees listed below. The revenue and expenditures for each PFE Fee type is tracked by the City in a separate fund.

Table 1. Impact Fees and Impact Fee Funds
Fund No. Fee Name Purpose and Use of the Fee
2150 Park In-Lieu
Park in -lieu fees, tracked in Fund 215 0, are enacted per the City’s Code of Ordinances, Chapter 17.32 Park Dedication and Fees. Park in-lieu fees are governed by the Quimby Act (CA State GC 66477), not the Mitigation Fee Act, and are not subject to the same standards of reporting as Lincoln’s other PFE fees. Though park in-lieu fees are not governed by the Mitigation Fee Act, the city has decided to report on these fees in a similar manner to PFE fees for transparency purposes.
2400 Transportation
The purpose of the transportation fee is to fund transportation facilities costs attributable to the impact from new development. The transportation fee will be used to fund the construction of transportation-related facilities identified by the City as necessary to serve new development. A summary of facilities is available in Table A-10 of Appendix A, and greater detail in Table B-1 of Appendix B, to the August 15, 2022, Nexus Study Report. 2410 Police
The purpose of the police fee is to fund the fair-share portion of police facilities, vehicles, and equipment costs attributable to the impact from new development. The police fee will be used to fund the purchase or construction of police station facilities, vehicles, and equipment identified by the City to serve new development. These facilities are identified in Table A-28 of Appendix A to the 2022 to the August 15, 2022, Nexus Study Report. 2420 Fire
The purpose of the fire fee is to fund fire facilities costs attributable to the impact from new development. The fire fee will be used to fund the fair share portion of fire stations, fire vehicles and equipment for development in Areas Nos. 1 and 2. These facilities are identified in Tables A-25 and A-26 of Appendix A to the August 15, 2022, Nexus Study Report. 2430 Administration
The purpose of the administration facilities fee is to fund City administration facilities costs attributable to the impact from new development. The administration facilities fee will be used to fund the construction of administration building space that has been identified by the City to serve new development. This facility is presented in Table A-30 of Appendix A to the August 15, 2022, Nexus Study Report.
39 City of Lincoln 5
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS
Fund No. Fee Name Purpose and Use of the Fee
2440 Library
The purpose of the library fee is to fund library facilities costs attributable to the impact from new development in PFE Area No. 2. The library fee will be used to fund the construction of library facilities that have been identified by the City to serve new development. These facilities are presented in Table A-32 of Appendix A to the August 15, 2022, Nexus Study Report.
2460 Park and
Recreation
The purpose of the parks and recreation fee is to fund park and recreation facilities attributable to the impact from new development. The parks and recreation fee will be used to fund the construction of park and recreation facilities that have been identified by the City to serve new development. These park and recreation facilities are identified in Tables A-36, A-38, and A-42 of Appendix A to the August 15, 2022 Nexus Study Report. 2470 Drainage
The purpose of the drainage fee is to fund drainage facilities that are attributable to the impact from new development.

The drainage fee will be used to fund the construction of drainage facilities identified by the City as necessary to serve new development. These facilities are identified in Table B-5 of Appendix B to the August 15, 2022, Nexus Study Report. 2900 Oak Tree
Oak Tree Mitigation fees, tracked in Fund 2900, are fees imposed by the City when development does not comply with the City’s design guidelines for the preservation of oak trees. Though not development impact fees governed by the Mitigation Fee Act, the City has decided to report on these fees in a similar manner to PFE fees. 7150 Water
The purpose of the water fee is to fund water facilities that are attributable to the impact from new development in the City by build-out of the General Plan area. The water fee will be used to fund construction of water facilities that have been identified by the City as necessary to serve new development. These facilities are summarized in detail in Table B-4 of Appendix B to the August 15, 2022, Nexus Study Report. 7250 Wastewater
The purpose of the wastewater fee is to fund wastewater collection, non -potable water, and wastewater treatment facilities that are attributable to the impact from new development. The wastewater fee will be used to fund the fair share portion of the cost of constructing wastewater collection, non-potable water, and treatment facilities that have been identified by the City as necessary to serve new development. These facilities are identified specifically in Tables B- 2 and B-3 of Appendix B and in Appendix D to the August 15, 2022, Nexus Study Report. 7350 Solid Waste
The purpose of the solid waste fee is to fund solid waste vehicles and equipment costs attributable to the impact from new development. The solid waste fee will be used to fund the purchase of solid waste vehicles as identified by the City to serve new development. These items are identified in Table A-34 of Appendix A to the August 15, 2022, Nexus Study Report.

40 City of Lincoln 6
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS

2.2 Current Fee Schedule
During Fiscal Year 2022-23, the Lincoln City Council adopted Resolution 2022-241 on October 25, 2022, which included a revised Public Facility Element Fee Program Nexus Study Report (August 15, 2022), as well as a phased in approach to update fees to the full amount identified in the Nexus Study Report. On May 23, 2023, City Council adopted Resolution 2023-093, which included updated PFE fees that were in effect from July 1, 2024, through August 31, 2024. On June 11, 2024, City Council adopted Resolution 2024-124, which included updated PFE fees that were in effect from July 1, 2024, through August 31, 2024.
 Attachment 1 to this report includes the PFE fee amounts in effect between July 1, 2024, and August 31, 2024  Attachment 2 to this report includes the PFE fee amounts in effect between September 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025 41 City of Lincoln 7
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS

FINANCIAL SUMMARY REPORT
The following provides the required financial summary for each PFE fund, to include the beginning and ending balance, amount of fees and/or charges collected, and interest earned for the Fiscal Year End June 30, 2025. Figures shown in the table below are unaudited as of the date of this report.

Table 2. Financial Summary Fiscal Year 2025

Fund No. 2150 2400 2410 2420 2430 2440 2460
Description Park In-Lieu Transportation Police Fire Admi nistration Library Parks Fees 9,408 1,715,298 348,453 270,971 404,017 102,891 979,329 Interest 28,479 694,892 63,631 19,170 90,128 14,912 268,966 Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year
1 1,112,961 18,566,018 2,314,737 (916, 964) 3,286,670 597,257 10,1 67,221 Fund Balance, End of the Year 1
1,143,978 32,791,212 2,249,925 (629, 812) 3,761,439 597,758 9,11 1,996 1 Beginning & Ending Fund Balance is reported per fi nancial reports provided by the City's Finance Depa rtment Fund No. 2470 2900 7150 7250 7350
Description Drainage Oak Tree Water Wastewater Solid Was te Fees 549,610 75,750 1,034,948 61 1,842 263,707 Interest 71,326 11,525 340,437 102,288 84,533 Fund Balance, Beginning of the Year
1 1,363,779 421,533 12,679,526 3,580,470 3,627,170 Fund Balance, End of the Year 1
1,950,994 481,812 13,791,493 2,018,663 2,561,827 1 Beginning & Ending Fund Balance is reported per fi nancial reports provided by the City's Finance Depa rtment 42 City of Lincoln 8
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
This section of the Annual Report identifies each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

Table 3. Public Improvements Fiscal Year 2025

The Mitigation Fee Act also requires annual identification of the approximate date by which the construction of a public improvement will commence, if the City determines sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing of an incomplete public improvement. Other than the projects listed in the table above, the City has not identified any public improvements that have sufficient funds as of June 30, 2025, to complete the financing on incomplete public improvements.

Fund Fund Name CIP # Project Name Project
Start
Project
Finish Project Phase Total Project
Funding
Total Impact
Fee Funded
Amount
% Impact
Fee Funded
Total Prior Year
Impact Fee
Expenditures
FY 2025 Impact
Fee
Expenditures
Impact Fee
Funding
Remaining
2400 Transportation 329 East Joiner Pkwy Widening 2018/ 19 2024/25 Completed 8,044,741 $ 8,044,741 $ 100% 8,041,211 $ 3,530 $ - $ 2400 Transportation 644 Ferrari Ranch Rd Improvements 2 023/24 2025/26 Active 10,628,000 $ 10,000,000 $ 94% 133,423 $ 331,826 $ 9,534,751 $ 2400 Transportation 682 E. Joiner & Del Webb Blvd Impr . 2022/23 2026/27 Active 6,374,085 $ 6,374,085 $ 100% - $ 227,737 $ 6,146,348 $ 2400 Transportation 613 Moore Rd Class 1 Trail 2022/23 2 025/26 Active 1,215,000 $ 1,215,000 $ 100% 166,993 $ 8,970 $ 1,039,037 $ 2410 Police 622 PD IT Room Expansion 2022/23 2025/26 Acti ve 963,095 $ 963,095 $ 100% 411,826 $ 420,258 $ 131,011 $ 2410 Police 626 PD Parking Lot Expansion 2021/22 2026/27 Active 755,000 $ 755,000 $ 100% 39,196 $ 105,929 $ 609,875 $ 2430 Admin 632 City Hall Reorganization Project 2022/23 2025/26 On Hold 725,000 $ 725,000 $ 100% 60,341 $ 89,827 $ 574,832 $ 2440 Library n/a Library Collections 2007/08 on-going Act ive 4,402,985 $ 4,402,985 $ 100% 1,432,268 $ 66,140 $ 2,904,577 $ 2440 Library 669 Library HVAC Controls Upgrade 2023/24 2 024/25 Completed 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 100% 178,771 $ 7,525 $ 13,704 $ 2440 Library 668 Library Book Lockers 2024/25 2025/26 Act ive 55,000 $ 55,000 $ 100% - $ 41,329 $ 13,671 $ 2460 Parks 461 Aitken Park Ph3 2019/20 2024/25 Completed 2,300,000 $ 2,012,236 $ 87% 1,128,027 $ - $ 884,209 $ 2150 Parks 464 Aldo Pineschi Jr Park 2020/21 2027/28 Acti ve 1,000,000 $ 17% - $ - $ 1,000,000 $ 2460 Parks 464 Aldo Pineschi Jr Park 2020/21 2027/28 Acti ve 3,991,481 $ 67% - $ 387,900 $ 3,603,581 $ 2460 Parks 466 Jimenez Park lot paving 2020/21 2024/25 Co mpleted 385,300 $ 205,000 $ 53% 160,452 $ 38,718 $ 5,830 $ 2460 Parks 467 Jimenez Ph3 - soccer 2020/21 2024/25 Compl eted 3,441,790 $ 3,051,070 $ 89% 765,641 $ 1,049,259 $ 1,236,169 $ 2460 Parks 497 Bella Breeze Master Plan 2021/22 2027/28 Active 1,838,300 $ 1,838,300 $ 100% 606,135 $ 532,321 $ 699,844 $ 2460 Parks 637 Community Center Park 2023/24 2027/28 Acti ve 2,750,000 $ 2,750,000 $ 100% 85,490 $ 294,515 $ 2,369,995 $ 2460 Parks 686 Fitness Court Healthy Cities Grant 2024/ 25 2024/25 Completed 213,038 $ 213,038 $ 100% - $ 213,038 $ - $ 2470 Drainage 181 Lakeview Farms Storage Ph 1 2022/23 20 26/27 Active 1,173,000 $ 1,173,000 $ 100% - $ 1,123 $ 1,171,877 $ 7150 Water n/a Meters and MXUs for new construction on- going on-going Active 1,700,524 $ 1,700,524 $ 100% 1,432,268 $ 268,256 $ - $ 7250 Wastewater 478 East Joiner Pump Station Improveme nts 2023/24 2025/26 Active 1,827,705 $ 1,775,000 $ 97% - $ 1,152,219 $ 622,781 $ 7250 Wastewater 657 Q St Sewer Lift Station Rehab Desi gn 2024/25 2025/26 Active 585,000 $ 585,000 $ 100% - $ 115,776 $ 469,224 $ 7350 Solid Waste 618 Cardboard Recycling Facility 2024/25 2024/25 Completed 828,005 $ 828,005 $ 100% -$ 828,005 $ -$ 7350 Solid Waste V417 Street Sweeper 2024/25 2024/25 Comp leted 425,927 $ 425,927 $ 100% - $ 425,927 $ - $ 7350 Solid Waste V418 Flat-bed Truck 2024/25 2024/25 Comp leted 143,497 $ 143,497 $ 100% - $ 143,497 $ - $ 56,977,117 $ 54,426,984 $ 14,642,044 $ 6,753,625 $ 33,031,315 $ PFE Fees
TOTAL
6,002,125 $
43 City of Lincoln 9
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS
Government Section 66013(d) has similar requirements for water and wastewater capacity charges to identify each public improvement that is anticipated to be undertaken in the following fiscal year. For Funds 7150 and 7250, the following are a list of public improvements anticipated to be undertaken in Fiscal Year 2025/26 in addition to those projects shown as “Active” in the table on the previous page.

Water PFE Fund 7150:
 CIP 654 Water Distribution Rehab - Work began on this project in FY 2023/24, however, non-PFE funds were used. 44 City of Lincoln 10
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS

INTERFUND LOANS
The Mitigation Fee Act requires a description of each interfund transfer or loan made from the account or fund, including interest rates, repayment dates, and a description of the improvement on which the transfer or loan will be expended.

There were no new interfund transfers or loans made between impact fee funds in Fiscal Year 2025. The following table summarizes all active interfund loans to and/or from the City’s impact fee funds.

Table 4. Interfund Loans Fiscal Year 2025

Date of Loan Maturity Date Purpose of Loan Original
Advance
Fiscal Year 2025
Payment/ Transfer
Balance
06/30/2025
Interest
Rate 1
06/30/18 06/30/28 Completion of Regional Retention Fa cility CIP 181 1,856,200 $ 7350 Solid Waste Non- Ops 2470 PFE Drainage 170,313 $ 356,394 $ 0.62% 07/01/16 04/01/38 Refi. Original loan, add additonal funds required to construct Fire# 33 and #34 5,300,000 $ 2250 PCWA WCC 2420 Fire PFE 116,031 $ 1,394,039 $ 0.34% 06/30/18 06/30/28 Regional Retention Facility 1,010,00 0 $ 2400 Transportation 2470 Drainage 172,016 $ 359,958 $ 0.62% 1 Interest Rates are Average and/or Fixed 5-year LAIF rate Lender Borrower
45 City of Lincoln 11
Annual Development Impact Fee Report
Prepared by NBS

REFUNDS
The refunding requirements for both the Mitigation Fee Act and the Quimby Act are summarized as follows:

Refunds under the Mitigation Fee Act: If the City determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on incomplete improvements for which impact fee revenue is to be used, it must, within 180 days of that determination, identify an approximate date by which construction of the public improvement will be commenced (Government Code Section 66001 (e)). If the agency fails to comply with that requirement, it must refund impact fee revenue in the account according to procedures specified in Section 66001 (d).

As discussed in Section 4 of this report, in Fiscal Year 2024-25 no such determination has been made regarding sufficient funds collected to complete incomplete improvements. Therefore, no refunds were made or required.

Disclaimer: In preparing this report and any analys is and findings included herein, NBS has relied on several principal assumptions and considerations re garding financial matters, conditions and events th at occurred or may occur in the future. This informat ion and assumptions, including the City’s budgets, financial reports, capital project data, and other information were provided by sources we believe to be reliable; however, NBS has not independently verifi ed such information and assumptions. While we belie ve NBS’ use of such information and assumptions is reasonable for the purpose of this report, some assumptions will invariably not materialize as stat ed herein and may vary due to unanticipated events and circumstances. 46 _______________________________________________________________________________________ City of Lincoln
ATTACHMENT 1
_______________________________________________________________________________________

Public Facility Element Fees schedule in effect between July 1, 2024, and August 31, 2024

47 8/1/2023
Transportation Area 1 $ 4,675.49
Area 2 $ 4,061.61
Wastewater Area 1 $ 10,481.90
Area 2 $ 10,942.15
Water Area 1 $ 3,041.90
Area 2 $ 2,113.81
Drainage Area 1 North $ 2,402.47
Area 1 South $ 1,045.75
Area 2 $ 822.60
Fire Area 1 $ 611.42
Area 2 $ 670.87
Police Area 1 $ 766.82
Area 2 $ 853.03
Administration Area 1 $ 1,030.91
Area 2 $ 1,030.91
Library Area 1 $ -
Area 2 $ 515.19
Solid Waste Area 1 $ 691.75
Area 2 $ 674.51
Parks and Trail Area 1 $ 4,788.68
Area 2 $ -
Neighborhood Park Area 1 $ -
Area 2 $ 3,902.02
Regional Park Area 1 $ -
Area 2 $ 1,798.59
Trail Area 1 $ -
Area 2 $ 249.96
Recreation Area 1 $ 263.16
Area 2 $ 287.16
Resolution 2023-093
PFE Fee Table per EDU Effective July 1, 2024 - August 31, 2024 City of Lincoln 48

_______________________________________________________________________________________ City of Lincoln
ATTACHMENT 2
_______________________________________________________________________________________

Public Facility Element Fees schedule in effect between September 1, 2024, and June 30, 2025

49 9/2/2024
Transportation Area 1 $ 5,670.94
Area 2 $ 4,464.26
Wastewater Area 1 $ 11,394.80
Area 2 $ 12,299.30
Water Area 1 $ 3,075.48
Area 2 $ 2,137.14
Drainage Area 1 North $ 2,984.66
Area 1 South $ 1,057.29
Area 2 $ 831.67
Fire Area 1 $ 662.75
Area 2 $ 779.66
Police Area 1 $ 775.28
Area 2 $ 862.45
Administration Area 1 $ 1,086.57
Area 2 $ 1,086.57
Library Area 1 $ -
Area 2 $ 1,013.19
Solid Waste Area 1 $ 699.39
Area 2 $ 681.96
Parks and Trail Area 1 $ 5,364.06
Area 2 $ -
Neighborhood Park Area 1 $ -
Area 2 $ 3,945.09
Regional Park Area 1 $ -
Area 2 $ 2,878.24
Trail Area 1 $ -
Area 2 $ 491.56
Recreation Area 1 $ 517.54
Area 2 $ 564.71
Resolution 2024-124
PFE Fee Table per EDU Effective September 1, 2024 - June 30, 2025 City of Lincoln 50
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION 2026 - ###

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING THE ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2025, AND MAKING FINDINGS AS REQUIRED BY THE MITIGATION FEE ACT.

WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln’s Municipal Code requires new developmen t to bear the cost of its increased demand/effect on municipal services and facilities so as not to create a greater burden on existing residents; and

WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln has imposed and collected development impact fees based upon several adopted nexus reports completed in accordance with Government Code § 66000, et seq.; and

WHEREAS, Section 66006(b)(2) of the Government Code requires the City to review the information concerning local agency improvement fees made available to the public at a regularly scheduled meeting.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lincoln has reviewed and approves the Annual Development Impact Fee Report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2025.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13TH day of January, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

51 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution for
Approving the Improvement Plans and
Technical Specifications, and Authorizing the Engineering Department to Proceed With Bidding the Project for
Construction for the Water Rehabilitation FY 23/24 (CIP 654). (Jacob Groeser)
SUBMITTED BY:

Jacob Groeser
DEPARTMENT:

Engineering
DATE:

January 13, 2026

Item Number 11.E

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution approving the improvement plans and technical specifications, and authorizing the Engineering Department to proceed with bidding the project for construction for the Water Rehabilitation FY 23/24 (CIP 654).

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The Fiscal Year 2025/26 budget includes CIP 654 – Water Rehabilitation FY 23/24. The water rehabilitation component of this project will replace the deteriorating water infrastructure in 4 th
Street
from R Street to J Street, L Street from 3
rd
Street to 5
th
Street, 3
rd
Street from L Street to J Street, and
Stephanie Court. M Street from 3
rd
Street to 5
th
Street has been designed and will be included as a bid
alternative to award if the construction budget allows.

On May 14, 2024
, City Council authorized a Task Order with REY Engineers, Inc. for professional engineering services for design of the Water Rehabilitation FY 23/24 Project The engineer’s estimate for the construction of the improvements is $5,200,000 (including a 10% contingency). The plans and specifications may be subject to minor technical revisions for clarification as approved by the City Engineer prior to, and during the advertisement period that do not affect the size, scope or intent of the project. A partial set of Improvement Plans is included as Attachment A. A complete set of Improvement Plans and Specifications can be made available for viewing upon request.

Coastland will provide construction management and inspection services through the City’s on-call services contract.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

The project is currently programmed with the following milestone schedule:

STAFF REPORT
52 The project is currently programmed with the following milestone schedule:

Advertise for Construction: January 2026 – February 2026 Award Contract for Construction: March 2026
Construction Period: April 2026 – February 2027

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed project qualifies for a categorical/statutory exemption under section 15302(c) – Replacement of Existing Utilities and thereby is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. This project will not lead to an increase in the capacity of the existing water distribution system.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project is funded in Fiscal Year 2025/26 Fund 7100 and Fund 7150.

Budgeted
Fund 7110 $2,750,000 Fund 7115 $2,750,000 Total Budgeted $5,500,000

Estimated Project Costs
Fund 7110/7115
Design (R.E.Y.) $ 519,679 Construction Management & Inspection (Coastland) $ 250,000 Construction (Engineer’s Estimate) $ 5,200,000 Total Estimated Costs $ 5,969,679

Based on the engineer’s estimate, a budget augmentation will be needed; however, the exact amount will not be known until
receiving bids and knowing the actual construction contract cost of the lowest responsive bidder
.

ATTACHMENTS:

Water Rehab FY 23-24 PS&E.DOC3.Attachment A.2026January13.jgroeser.pdf Resolution.docx
53 WATER SERVICE LINE
PROJECT PLANS FOR:CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIAR.E.Y. PROJECT No. 5175.3010ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTLINCOLN WATER DISTRIBUTION REHAB FY 23/24CIP #654 CARLYE BUCHHOLZ, P.E., P.L.S.VIN CAY, P.E., CITY ENGINEERDESIGNED UNDER THE DIRECTION OFAPPROVED BY CITY OF LINCOLNDATEDATE DATERECORD DRAWING CERTIFICATE:CARLYE BUCHHOLZ, P.E., P.L.S.THIS SET OF PLANS, HAVING BEEN REVIEWED BY ME, REFLECT ALL APPROVEDREVISIONS TO THE PROJECT KNOWN TO ME, AND ALL FIELD DEVIATIONS TO THEPLANNED IMPROVEMENTS BY THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR, AS REPORTEDTO ME AS OF ______________________________. IT DOES NOT REPRESENT FIELDVERIFICATION OF PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS BY ME.DATEVIN CAY, P.E., CITY ENGINEER UTILITY REPRESENTATIVESREPRESENTATIVETELEPHONEPG & EAT&TCITY OF LINCOLNCITY OF LINCOLNCITY OF LINCOLNU.S.A.FIRE DEPARTMENTWAVE BROADBANDU.S.A.FIRECABLE TVDRAINAGEWATERSEWERTELEPHONEELECTRICITYGASPG & E(916) 409-1370(530) 889-3134PUBLIC WORKS DEPTLEE NIETOKRISTOPHER OLSTADKRISTOPHER OLSTAD(530) 889-3134PUBLIC WORKS DEPTPUBLIC WORKS DEPT(916) 434-2450(916) 434-2450(916) 434-2450(800) 624-2444(916) 645-4040(916) 919-2708BOBBY HOLMESCONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONSCOMMUNICATION(916) 786-1218WENDY DAPORE

UTILITY
175'SCALE IN FEET0250'500'
PLAN SCALE: 1" = 250'

EGASWSDSSFOOHTOHE

ABAGGREGATE BASEABNABANDONACASPHALT CONCRETEACPASBESTOS CEMENT PIPEALT ALTERNATIVEARVAIR RELEASE VALVEAVEAVENUEBLDGBUILDINGBOBLOW-OFFBOWBACK OF WALKBOVBLOW-OFF VALVEBTFLYBUTTERFLYCOMMCOMMUNICATIONCIPCAST IRON PIPECMPCORRUGATED METAL PIPECLCENTERLINEDIDRAINAGE INLETDIADIAMETERDWGDRAWINGELECELECTRICELEVELEVATIONEPEDGE OF PAVEMENT(E)EXISTINGFDCFIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONFGFINISH GRADEFHFIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLYFLFLOW LINEFSFIRE SERVICEINTXINTERSECTIONJTJOINT TRENCHLFLINEAR FOOTMAXMAXIMUMMHMANHOLE MINMINIMUM(N)NEWNTSNOT TO SCALEPCCPORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETEPHPOTHOLEPLPROPERTY LINEPPPOWER POLE(P)PROPOSEDPUEPUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTPVCPOLYVINYL CHLORIDER/WRIGHT OF WAYS=SLOPESVCSERVICESDSTORM DRAINSSSANITARY SEWERSSCOSANITARY SEWER CLEANOUTSTSTREETSTASTATIONSTDSTANDARDSTLSTEELTBCTOP BACK OF CURBTBWTOP BACK OF SIDEWALKTELETELEPHONETYPTYPICALVCPVITRIFIED CLAY PIPEWWATERWH/APWHERE APPLICABLEWMWATER METERWSWATER SERVICE(1" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE)WSSWATER SAMPLING STATIONWTRWATERXINGCROSSING (E)SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE(E)SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT(E)STORM DRAIN MANHOLE(E)STORM DRAIN INLET(E)WATER METER BOX(E)FIRE HYDRANT(E)WATER VALVE(E)GAS VALVE(E)UTILITY POLE(E)STREET LIGHT(E)GUY ANCHOR(E)ELECTRIC BOX(E)TELEVISION BOX(E)TELEPHONE BOX(E)TREE(E)SURVEY MONUMENT(E)MAILBOX (E)OVERHEAD TELEPHONE(E)OVERHEAD ELECTRIC(E)GAS(E)WATER PIPE & SIZE(E)STORM DRAIN PIPE & SIZE(E)SANITARY SEWER PIPE & SIZE(E)UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC(E)UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC

WATER PIPE AND SIZEHORIZONTAL BENDTEECROSS
1" ARV (PER CITY STD DWG W-8)WATER SAMPLING STATION 2" BLOW-OFF VALVE(PER CITY STD DWG W-7)FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY & LATERALCONNECT TO (E)WATER SYSTEMLOCATION W/CORRESPONDING LETTERDESIGNATIONPOTHOLE LOCATION & NUMBER 1#
A#
SD
1#*

ABBREVIATIONS

LEGENDSCALED FOR CLARITY
(E)PUE
BASIS OF BEARINGGENERAL NOTES:DESCRIPTIONOWNER OF RECORDBENCH MARKTHE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THISSURVEY IS DEFINED BY THE 1992(EPOCH1991.35) ADJUSTMENT OF THE CA HPGNNAD83 AS SHOWN ON THE CITY OFLINCOLN G.P.S. CONTROL NETWORK(R.O.S. 3069 BK 20 PG 159).

ELEV. 134.988 FT58" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP STAMPED"WOOD RODGERS LS5854" AT CENTERLINEINTERSECTION OF FIRST ST., DOUGLAS DR.,& CHAMBERS DR., LINCOLN. STATION 110OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN G.P.S. CONTROLNETWORK (R.O.S. 3069 BK 20 PG 159).CITY OF LINCOLN600 SIXTH STREETLINCOLN, CALIFORNIA 95648916-434-2400 (E)CONCRETE
6"W60"SD12"SS

COC(E)UNDERGROUND COMM
(E)FENCE

ABN(E)ABANDONED WATERLINE

VALVEVERTICAL BEND
1"2"DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C01C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNTITLE SHEETCIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.AS NOTEDNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
8"W SHEET INDEX

STEPHANIE CTQ ST
R ST
P ST

K ST J STK ST
2ND ST
3RD ST4TH ST

M STN STO ST
J ST1ST ST
5TH STI ST I ST4TH ST 4TH ST
C12C13C16C15C14
C29C19C20C21C22C23C24C25C26C27C28C11C17C18
5TH ST
C01TITLE SHEETC02NOTESC03DETAILSC04CONNECTION DETAILSC05CONNECTION DETAILSC06DEMOLITION PLAN - L STC07DEMOLITION PLAN - M ST (BID ALT)C08DEMOLITION PLAN - 3RD ST & STEPHANIE CTC09DEMOLITION PLAN - 4TH ST 1+00 TO 17+25C10DEMOLITION PLAN - 4TH ST 17+50 TO 34+75C11PLAN & PROFILE - L ST STA 1+00 TO 4+50C12PLAN & PROFILE - L ST STA 4+50 TO 8+00C13PLAN & PROFILE - L ST STA 8+00 TO 11+25C14PLAN & PROFILE - M ST (BID ALT) STA 1+00 TO 4+50C15PLAN & PROFILE - M ST (BID ALT) STA 4+50 TO 8+00C16PLAN & PROFILE - M ST (BID ALT) STA 8+00 TO 11+15C17PLAN & PROFILE - 3RD ST STA 1+00 TO 4+00C18PLAN & PROFILE - 3RD ST STA 4+00 TO 7+60C19PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 1+00 TO 4+50C20PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 4+50 TO 8+00C21PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 8+00 TO 11+50C22PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 11+50 TO 14+50C23PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 14+50 TO 18+00C24PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 18+00 TO 21+50C25PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 21+50 TO 25+00C26PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 25+00 TO 28+50C27PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 28+50 TO 32+00C28PLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 32+00 TO 35+00C29PLAN & PROFILE - STEPHANIE CTLEGENDBASE BIDBID ALT BID ALT WATER PIPE AND SIZE8"W
(E)RIGHT OF WAY(E)PROPERTY LINE
L ST
WATER SERVICE TYPE (SEE SHEET C03) WATER SERVICE TYPE (SEE SHEET C03) SERVICE TO BE WET-TAPPED 54 1.ALL SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO THESE PLANS,BE INSTALLED PER THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, AND BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE LATEST VERSION OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTSTANDARDS. PIPE ALTERNATIVES FOR MAINS AND SERVICES SHALL BE PER THE SPECIALPROVISIONS.2.EXISTING SEWER FACILITIES SHALL BE EXPOSED AND INVERTS VERIFIED PRIOR TOPLACEMENT OF PROPOSED PIPE.3.A VACUUM TEST SHALL BE DONE AFTER ASSEMBLY OF THE MANHOLE, BUT PRIOR TOBACKFILL. ALL LIFT HOLES SHALL BE FILLED WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT. ALL PIPES ENTERINGTHE MANHOLE SHALL BE PLUGGED TAKING CARE TO SECURELY BRACE THE PLUGS FROMBEING DRAWN INTO THE MANHOLE. THE TEST HEAD SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE THE TOP OFTHE CONE SECTION AND THE SEAL INFLATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS. A VACUUM OF 10" OF MERCURY (APPROXIMATELY 5PSI) SHALL BEDRAWN AND THE VACUUM PUMP SHUT OFF. WITH THE VALVES CLOSED, THE TIME SHALL BEMEASURED FOR THE VACUUM TO DROP TO 9". ACCEPTABLE TIMES ARE: 60+ SECONDS FOR48" MANHOLES, 75+ SECONDS FOR 60" MANHOLES, 90+ SECONDS FOR 72" MANHOLES, AND120+ SECONDS FOR 84" MANHOLES. IF THE MANHOLE FAILS THE INITIAL TEST, NECESSARYREPAIRS SHALL BE MADE WITH A NON-SHRINK GROUT WHILE THE VACUUM IS STILL BEINGDRAWN. RETESTING SHALL PROCEED UNTIL A SATISFACTORY TEST IS OBTAINED. THECONTRACTOR IS TO PERFORM THE TEST AND SUPPLY ALL TEST EQUIPMENT.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TELEVISING OF ALL SEWER MAINSPRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE OF THE SEWER BY THE CITY. A 72 HOUR NOTIFICATION MUST BEGIVEN TO THE ENGINEERING DIVISION PRIOR TO THE TELEVISING OF THE SEWER SYSTEM.ALL SEWER VIDEO TAPES/DATA ARE TO BE SUPPLIED TO THE CITY.5.SEWER MANHOLE RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE. RIMS ARE TOBE INSTALLED FLUSH WITH THE EXISTING ADJACENT PAVEMENT.6.REMOVAL OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MAINS, LATERALS, MANHOLES, AND INSTALLATIONOF NEW MAINS AND LATERALS SHALL BE DONE IN SUCH A WAY THAT SEWER SERVICES ARENOT INTERRUPTED FOR MORE THAN TWO HOURS TO ANY PROPERTY OR USER. IF THESYSTEM IS INTERRUPTED FOR MORE THAN TWO HOURS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDEA BY-PASS SYSTEM.7.SEWER LATERALS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER THE LATEST VERSION OF THE CITY OFLINCOLN PUBLIC WORKS STANDARD DETAILS SS-11 AND SS-12.

SEWER

1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTINGMONUMENTS AND OTHER SURVEY MARKERS. ANY SURVEY MONUMENTS OR MARKERSDESTROYED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE EXPENSE OF THECONTRACTOR.2.NO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE ISSUED UNTIL THE SURVEYMONUMENTS ARE IN PLACE AND THE POST-CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATIONFURNISHED TO THE CITY ENGINEER'S OFFICE.CONSTRUCTION STAKING

1.INSPECTION OF THE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:a.THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WILL INSPECT ALL POTABLE WATER SUPPLY.2.ALL WATER FACILITIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LINES, SERVICE BOXES, VALVES,AND ALL MISCELLANEOUS APPURTENANCES SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST VERSION OFTHE CITY OF LINCOLN PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS AND SHALL MEET THE"LEAD-FREE" REQUIREMENTS AS DICTATED BY SECTION 1417 OF THE FEDERAL SAFEDRINKING WATER ACT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALLNECESSARY INFORMATION, REQUIREMENTS, AND DRAWINGS NECESSARY TO BID ANDCOMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THESE PLANS, PER THE MANUFACTURER'SSPECIFICATIONS.PIPE ALTERNATIVES SHALL BE:a.POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PUBLIC): AWWA-C900 (DR-14) FOR PIPE SIZES 4" TO 16"b.DUCTILE IRON PIPE (PUBLIC): DUCTILE IRON PIPE 16" AND SMALLER SHALL BEAWWA-C151/A21.51 W/ PRESSURE RATING OF 350 PSI AND SHALL HAVE AN INTERIORMORTAR COATING IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA STANDARDS C-104/A21.4.3.ONLY CITY STAFF IS AUTHORIZED TO OPERATE CITY VALVES. NOTIFY ENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT 72 WORKING HOURS PRIOR TO NEEDING VALVES OPENED OR CLOSED. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING AFFECTED CUSTOMERS 72 HOURS BEFORESHUT OFF.4.FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE CLOW #2060 OR EQUAL APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. ALLHYDRANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CITY STD W-11 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESEPLANS. LATERALS SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PER CITY STANDARDS.5.ALL RUNS OF NONMETALLIC WATER MAINS SHALL HAVE A NO. 10 GAUGE SOLID INSULATEDSOFT-DRAWN COPPER WIRE PLACED OVER THE TOP OF THE PIPE. THE WIRE SHALL BESTUBBED UP INSIDE EACH VALVE BOX AND DEAD END ASSEMBLY. ANY SPLICES SHALL BESOLDERED OR USE WIRE NUT CONNECTIONS.6.AT UTILITY CROSSINGS, MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 12-INCH CLEARANCE BETWEEN WATER LINESAND ALL OTHER FACILITIES. ALL SEWER/WATER CROSSINGS INCLUDING SERVICES, SHALLCONFORM TO STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS, CITY STD. SS-10, AND SPECIALPROVISIONS.7.ALL VALVES SHALL BE FLANGED TO TEES AND/OR CROSSES. ALL MAINLINE VALVES 16-INCHAND LARGER SHALL BE BUTTERFLY VALVES. WHERE VALVE NUT IS GREATER THAN 30-INCHBELOW FINISHED GRADE, A VALVE OPERATING EXTENSION SHALL BE REQUIRED PER CITYSTD. W-9.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT TAKE WATER FROM A HYDRANT WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING AWATER METER BY APPLYING TO THE WATER UTILITY BILLING SECTION AT THE CITY HALL.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY AT (916-434-3233) 24-WORKING HOURS INADVANCE FOR INSTALLATION. A LOCATION MAP OF THE HYDRANT BEING USED SHALL BESUBMITTED TO THE CITY.9.WATER METER BOXES AND COVERS SUBJECT TO TRAFFIC SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATEDREINFORCED CONCRETE TYPE H-20 OR APPROVED EQUAL.10.ALL VALVES AND G-5 BOXES (EXISTING AND NEW) SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO GRADE ANDSHALL HAVE SUITABLE PERMANENT MARKERS WHICH CANNOT BE COVERED UP.11.ALL SINGLE WATER SERVICES LESS THAN 45' LONG SHALL BE 1" TYPE K COPPER WITHPOLYETHYLENE COATING, COMPRESSION FITTINGS, OR AS NOTED. ALL DUAL WATERSERVICES AND SINGLE SERVICES 45' AND LONGER SHALL BE 1-1/2" TYPE K COPPER WITHPOLYETHYLENE COATING, COMPRESSION FITTINGS, OR AS NOTED.12.ALL FITTINGS SHALL HAVE RESTRAINED JOINTS. ALL BENDS 45° OR GREATER SHALL HAVEBOTH RESTRAINED JOINTS AND THRUST BLOCKS.13.FOR THRUST BLOCK DETAILS, SEE CITY STD. W-6 & W-6A.14.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CITY AT LEAST 72 WORKING HOURS PRIOR TO DISINFECTIONOF WATERLINE SYSTEM, WITHOUT EXCEPTIONS.15.ALL FITTINGS TO BE POLYETHYLENE WRAPPED PER CITY SPECIFICATIONS.16.DISINFECTION AND WATER QUALITY SAMPLING WILL BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED ANDLICENSED FIRM ON BEHALF OF CONTRACTOR. CITY WILL REVIEW AND APPROVE TESTRESULTS PRIOR TO CONNECTION WITH THE EXISTING WATER SYSTEM.17.WATER SERVICE SADDLES SHALL BE CC THREAD; JONES J996, MUELLER 13000 SERIES, A.Y.MCDONALD 3805 C900, OR APPROVED EQUAL.18.CORPORATION STOPS SHALL BE CC THREAD X COMPRESSION: JONES E-1937SG, MUELLER B25008, A.Y. MCDONALD 74000 SERIES, OR APPROVED EQUAL. INSULATION REQUIRED WITHPOLYETHYLENE COATED COPPER SERVICES.19.ALL MATERIALS IN CONNECTION WITH THE WATER SYSTEM MUST BE MADE IN THE UNITEDSTATES OF AMERICA.20.WATER MAIN CONNECTIONS ARE NOT ALLOWED WHEN AMBIENT TEMPERATURES EXCEED100 DEGREE FAHRENHEIT.21.WATER SHUTDOWNS ARE NOT ALLOWED IF THE OUTDOOR TEMPERATURE IS FORECASTEDTO BE EQUAL OR GREATER THAN 100 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT.22.CONSECUTIVE DAYS OF WATER SHUTDOWNS ARE NOT ALLOWED.

1.WATER LINE DEFLECTION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED PER MANUFACTURER'SRECOMMENDATIONS AND PER CITY OF LINCOLN REQUIREMENTS.2.ALL D.I.P. WATER LINE JOINTS SHALL BE BONDED WITH INSULATED COPPER CABLE. ALSOTEST STATIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CORROSION ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATIONSAND AS APPROVED PER CITY ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR TO OBTAIN CORROSIONENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.3.THE CITY REQUIRES SUBMITTALS BE MADE TO THE CITY ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL OF ALLMATERIALS TO BE USED IN THE PROJECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.4.THE CITY REQUIRES ENCROACHMENT PERMITS FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION DONE IN THERIGHT OF WAY INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER, SEWER,STORM DRAIN, STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND DRY UTILITY CROSSINGS. THEENCROACHMENT PERMITS SHALL BE ON FILE WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN NECESSARY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS FOR THEPROJECT, AND BE IN RECEIPT OF SUCH PERMITS AND APPROVED PLANS PRIOR TOBEGINNING OF CONSTRUCTION.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT SITE SECURITY MEASURES TO THESATISFACTION OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN POLICE DEPARTMENT.6.ALL CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AND STATIONARY NOISE SOURCES ARE REQUIRED TOHAVE EFFECTIVE MANUFACTURER INSTALLED MUFFLERS.7.LOCATE EQUIPMENT WARM-UP AREAS, WATER TANKS, AND EQUIPMENT STORAGE AS FARFROM EXISTING RESIDENCES AS FEASIBLE.8.IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S NOISE ORDINANCE, THE HOURS OF PROJECTCONSTRUCTION SHALL BE:7:00 AM TO 7:00 PM (MONDAY THRU FRIDAY)8:00 AM TO 5:00 PM (SATURDAY, SUNDAY & HOLIDAYS)SATURDAY, SUNDAY & HOLIDAY WORK REQUIRES WRITTEN REQUEST TO CITY ENGINEER 72HOURS PRIOR TO DESIRED CONSTRUCTION.9.ALL EXISTING UTILITIES NOT SHOWN TO BE ABANDONED SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ATCRITICAL CROSSINGS AS SHOWN ON PLANS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.11.WATER LINES SHALL HAVE 42" MINIMUM COVER TO FINISHED GRADE EXCEPT ATLOCATIONS WHERE PROPOSED WATER PIPE CONNECTS TO EXISTING SYSTEM.12.WATER SERVICE LINES SHALL HAVE 36" MINIMUM COVER TO FINISHED GRADE.13.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ON PLANS ARE 2D LENGTHS. PIPE LABELS IN PROFILE ONLYREFLECT PIPES ILLUSTRATED IN THE PROFILE.14.MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN WATER SERVICE SADDLES SHALL BE PER WATERLINEMANUFACTURES'S SPECIFICATION.15.HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SANITARY SEWER LATERALS AND WATER LATERALSSHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 10 FEET PER CALIFORNIA WATERWORKS STANDARDS, CHAPTER16, ARTICLE 4, SECTION 64572 AND PER GUIDANCE MEMO NO. 2003-02: GUIDANCE CRITERIAFOR THE SEPARATION OF WATER MAINS AND NON-POTABLE PIPELINES FROM CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DATED DECEMBER 14, 2017.16.ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE SHALL BE REMOVED, TRANSPORTED, AND DISPOSED OF OFF-SITEIN A SAFE AND LEGAL MANNER BY AUTHORIZED AND REGISTERED PERSONNEL. IF THECONTRACTOR IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO HANDLE ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE, HE/SHE SHALLMAKE ARRANGEMENTS WITH AN AUTHORIZED AND REGISTERED COMPANY FOR HANDLINGASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCHAS REQUIRED IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETING REMOVAL OF THE ASBESTOS CEMENTPIPE TO THE SUBGRADE LEVEL TO MINIMIZE HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS.

ENGINEER'S NOTES1.PRIOR TO ANY CORRECTIVE ACTION BY THE CONTRACTOR, WHICH IS NECESSARY DUE TOALLEGED DESIGN OR STAKING ERROR, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE SURVEYORFOR RE-STAKING AND VERIFICATION OF PREVIOUS STAKING.

1.THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTEDCONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO ASSUMESOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALLPERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE MADE TO APPLYCONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS, AND THECONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR FURTHER AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY ANDHOLD THE CITY AND THE CONSULTING ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALLLIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORKON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OFTHE CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL.2.ALL MATERIALS, METHODS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATESTVERSION OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS,ADOPTED LATEST EDITION OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIONSPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD PLANS (RANK SHALL BE ABOVE LISTED ORDERWHERE DISCREPANCIES EXIST). ALL WORK IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF CITYENGINEER OR HIS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. CERTIFICATION FORCONFORMANCE WITH CITY SPECIFICATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALLMATERIALS USED ON THE PROJECT UNLESS SPECIFICALLY WAIVED BY THE CITYENGINEER.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING THE CITY OF LINCOLNPUBLIC WORKS 48-HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK AND 24-HOURS PRIORTO RESUMPTION AFTER INTERRUPTION.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALLCURRENTLY APPLICABLE SAFETY LAWS OF ANY JURISDICTIONAL BODIES. FORINFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE STATE INDUSTRIAL SAFETY DEPARTMENT(916-455-5818).5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE TO SEE THAT ALLSUBCONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS HAVE CURRENT CITY BUSINESS LICENSES.THE WORK WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR COMPLETION UNTIL SUBMITTAL OF ACOMPLETE LIST WITH LICENSE NUMBERS TO THE CITY ENGINEER.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF EXISTINGPUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE WORK AREAAND SHALL ADEQUATELY BARRICADE PROJECT TO KEEP THE SITE PARTIALLYOPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC. ANY DAMAGE TO CITY OR PRIVATEIMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REPLACED OR REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR TOCURRENT CITY OF LINCOLN STANDARDS AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO RETAIN AND USE LOCALVENDORS, SUPPLIERS, SUBCONTRACTOR AND LABOR, PROVIDED SAME ARECOMPETITIVE.8.ALL CONTRACTORS USING TEMPORARY "HAUL AWAY" TYPE CONTAINERS ORTEMPORARY SANITARY FACILITIES SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BUSINESSLICENSES FOR USE OF SUBJECT FACILITIES. WHEN EMPTIED DELIVER TOWESTERN PLACER WASTE MANAGEMENT RECYCLING CENTER.9.THE TYPES, LOCATIONS, SIZES. AND/OR DEPTHS OF EXISTING UNDERGROUNDUTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE IMPROVEMENT PLANS WERE OBTAINED FROMSOURCES OF VARYING RELIABILITY. THE CONTRACTOR IS CAUTIONED THAT ONLYACTUAL EXCAVATION WILL REVEAL THE TYPES, EXTENT, SIZE, LOCATION, ANDDEPTH OF SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. A REASONABLE EFFORT HAS BEENMADE TO LOCATE AND DELINEATE ALL KNOWN UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.HOWEVER, THE CONSULTING ENGINEER CAN ASSUME NO RESPONSIBILITY FORTHE COMPLETENESS OR ACCURACY OF ITS DELINEATION OF SUCHUNDERGROUND FACILITIES NOR FOR THE EXISTENCE OF OTHER BURIED OBJECTSOR UTILITIES WHICH MAY BE ENCOUNTERED BUT WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ONTHESE PLANS. IF NO ELEVATION IS SHOWN IN THE PLANS THE CONTRACTOR SHALLASSUME THE ELEVATION TO BE UNKNOWN.IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTHOF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THIS VERIFICATION SHALL BE COORDINATED BY THECONTRACTOR WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. CALL USA NORTH FORUTILITY LOCATION QUESTIONS AT LEAST 48 WORKING HOURS BEFORE DIGGING BYPHONE AT 811.10.THE CONTRACTOR IS TO EXPOSE THE END OF WATER MAINS, SEWER, AND STORMDRAIN LINES AND EXISTING GRAVITY LINES FOR THE SURVEYOR TO VERIFYLOCATION AND DEPTH OF FACILITIES PRIOR TO CONNECTION OF PROPOSEDUTILITY. ALL COST FOR SUCH EXCAVATION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN PRICE FORVARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK.11.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPORTING ALL CONFLICTS,ERRORS, OMISSIONS, ETC. TO THE CONSULTING ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY UPONDISCOVERY. IF SO DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER OR CITY ENGINEER, THECONTRACTOR SHALL STOP WORK UNTIL MITIGATIONS CAN BE MADE, ANY COSTSINCURRED RESULTING FROM THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO STOP WORK ASDIRECTED SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL AT ALL TIMES COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH THAT OFOTHERS ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A RESPONSIBLE PARTY,WHO SHALL HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO REPRESENT AND ACT FOR THECONTRACTOR, ON THE JOB SITE DURING ALL WORKING HOURS.13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DELIVER ALL CONSTRUCTION RELATED REFUSECOLLECTED IN DEBRIS BOXES TO THE WESTERN PLACER WASTE MANAGEMENTAUTHORITY MATERIAL RECOVER FACILITY.14.THE CITY OF LINCOLN IS A MEMBER OF THE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT(U.S.A.) ONE CALL SYSTEM. THE CONTRACTORS SHALL NOTIFY THE U.S.A. CENTER48 WORKING HOURS IN ADVANCE OF PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION WORK BYCALLING 1-800-642-2444.15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK IN WHITE PAINT ALL AREAS TO BE EXCAVATEDPRIOR TO CONTACTING U.S.A. ANY AREAS NOT MARKED WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TOU.S.A., AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGERESULTING FROM EXCAVATION.16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OR INSPECTORA COPY OF THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL CAL/OSHA TRENCHING PERMIT AND A COPYOF THE COMPANY'S LETTER INFORMING CAL/OSHA OF THE TIME OF TRENCHING ISCOMMENCING AND THE LOCATION OF THE WORK PRIOR TO EXCAVATION OFTRENCHES 5' OR DEEPER.

17.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE ADVISED THAT THE OPERATION OF ANY EQUIPMENTWHICH IS 86 DBA LMAX AT 50 FEET FROM THE JOB SITE IS PROHIBITED BETWEENTHE HOURS OF 7:00 P.M. TO 7:00 A.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY AND BETWEENTHE HOURS OF 5:00 P.M. ON SATURDAY TO 8:00 A.M. ON SUNDAY, IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CITY'S NOISE ORDINANCE.18.CONSTRUCTION SHALL STOP IF CULTURAL RESOURCES ARE SUSPECTED. IT ISPOSSIBLE THAT PREVIOUS ACTIVITIES HAVE OBSCURED SURFACE EVIDENCE OFCULTURAL RESOURCES. IF SIGNS OF AN ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE, SUCH AS ANYUNUSUAL AMOUNTS OF STONE, BONE. OR SHELL ARE UNCOVERED DURINGGRADING OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, WORK SHALL BE HALTED WITHIN100 FEET OF THE FIND AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY OFLINCOLN. A QUALIFIED ARCHEOLOGIST SHALL BE CONSULTED FOR AN ON-SITEEVALUATION. ADDITIONAL MITIGATION MAY BE REQUIRED BY THE ARCHEOLOGIST.19.THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO POST-GROUND DISTURBANCE SITE VISIT FROM AREPRESENTATIVE OF THE UNITED AUBURN INDIAN COMMUNITY OF THE AUBURNRANCHERIA. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CITY ENGINEER A MINIMUM OFFOUR (4) WORKING DAYS BEFORE TRENCH EXCAVATION IS TO BEGIN.20.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS/MATERIALS LIST ANDCONSTRUCTION METHODS TO CITY FOR REVIEW IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.THESE SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL INCLUDE ALL APPURTENANCES, STRUCTURE,HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT CHANGES AND PIPE ENDS.21.CERTIFICATION FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE LATEST VERSION OF THE CITY OFLINCOLN SPECIFICATIONS WILL BE REQUIRED OF ALL MATERIAL USED ON THEPROJECT UNLESS SPECIFICALLY WAIVED BY THE ENGINEER.22.A SOILS ENGINEER SHALL BE ENGAGED BY THE CITY TO CERTIFY THAT THEVARIOUS ITEMS OF COMPACTION COMPLY WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND THATSPECIAL WORK REQUIRED HAS BEEN DONE SATISFACTORILY.23.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE A WATER TRUCK WHEN REQUIRED TO MAINTAINADEQUATE DUST CONTROL.24.INTERMEDIATE TRENCH BACKFILL SHALL BE IN MAXIMUM LIFTS OF 8" AND SHALLHAVE A MINIMUM RELATIVE COMPACTION OF 95%. COMPACTION SHALL BE BYMECHANICAL MEANS.25.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND PROTECT ALL EXISTING PRIVATE IRRIGATIONSYSTEMS IN PLACE. IF DAMAGE OCCURS DURING CONSTRUCTION THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE AND RECONSTRUCT TO THE SATISFACTION OF THEPROPERTY OWNER(S) AND THE CITY ENGINEER. ALL REPAIR EXPENSES SHALL BETHE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.26.ALL EXISTING FEATURES (MANHOLES, CLEANOUTS, MONUMENTS, STRIPINGPAVEMENT MARKINGS, ETC.) SHALL BE REFERENCED BY THE CONTRACTOR.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE REFERENCED AND COVERED PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.

DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C02C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNNOTESCIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.AS NOTEDNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTALCITY STANDARD NOTESWATER GENERAL NOTES 55 PUE / R/WEPFL TBCTBWP.U.E. / R/WVARIES2' MIN (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION)WM(E)WATER PIPE WATER SERVICE LINE TYPE N.T.S.
(E)WATER SERVICE LINE0'-5' FROM (E)WM TO PROPOSED WM

1.EXISTING METERS & TRANSMITTER UNITS ARE TO BE RELOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. NO NEWMETERS ARE PROPOSED WITH THIS PROJECT.2.NEW METER BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED.3.SERVICE LINE SHALL BE 1 INCH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS. CONNECTNEW SERVICE LINE TO EXISTING METER WITH JONES E-128H OR APPROVED EQUAL ADAPTER.4.REPLACE PRIVATE WATER SERVICE LINE BEHIND THE (N)METER BOX, AS SHOWN. CONTRACTOR TOMATCH SIZE AND MATERIAL OF EXISTING IN-TRACT SERVICE LINE.5.SEE GENERAL WS NOTES, BELOW, FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES.NOTES REMOVE & RELOCATE (E)WATER METER.REMOVE & DISPOSE OF (E)METER BOX.

PROPOSED WATER PIPENEW WATER SERVICE LINENEW LOCATION FOR (E)WATERMETER & (N)METER BOXCONNECT IN-TRACT SERVICELINE (SEE NOTE 4)WMIN-TRACT SERVICE LINE(SEE NOTE 4)CUT AND CAP DOWNSTREAMOF (E) METER BOXP.U.E. / R/WEPFL TBCTBWP.U.E. / R/WVARIES2' MIN. (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION)WM(E)WATER PIPE N.T.S.

WMREMOVE & RELOCATE (E)WATER METER.REMOVE & DISPOSE OF (E)METER BOX.>5'

WATER SERVICE LINE TYPE
NOTES1.USE TYPE 2 IN CASES WHERE PROPOSED METER IS INSTALLED MORE THAN 5' IN FRONT OF OR BEHIND THE EXISTING METER. 2.EXISTING METERS & TRANSMITTER UNITS ARE TO BE RELOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. NO NEW METERS ARE PROPOSED WITH THISPROJECT AS THE RECENTLY COMPLETED AMI METER REPLACEMENT PROJECT INSTALLED NEW METERS AND TRANSMITTER UNITS ASNECESSARY.3.NEW METER BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED.4.SERVICE LINE SHALL BE 1 INCH UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN & PROFILE SHEETS. CONNECT NEW SERVICE LINE TO EXISTINGMETER WITH JONES E-128H OR APPROVED EQUAL ADAPTER.5.REPLACE PRIVATE WATER SERVICE LINE THROUGH THE REMOVAL OF (E)METER BOX AND BEHIND THE (N)METER BOX, AS SHOWN. MATCHSIZE AND MATERIAL OF EXISTING IN-TRACT SERVICE LINE. CONNECT TO (E)IN-TRACT SERVICE LINE WITH APPROPRIATE ADAPTER BASEDON SIZE AND MATERIAL.6.WHERE (E)WM IS LOCATED WITHIN (E)CONCRETE DRIVEWAY, WM IS TO BE RELOCATED WITHIN (E)CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND WITHINPUBLIC R/W AS SHOWN ON PLANS.7.SEE GENERAL WS NOTES, BELOW, FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES.

WMALTERNATE LOCATION (SEE NOTE 5)NEW WATER SERVICE LINEPROPOSEDWATER PIPE NEW LOCATION FOR (E)WATERMETER & (N)METER BOXIN-TRACT SERVICE LINE(SEE NOTE 4)CONNECT IN-TRACT SERVICE LINE(SEE NOTE 5)(E)WATER SERVICE LINECUT AND CAP DOWNSTREAMOF (N)SERVICE TIE-INTBCEPFL PL
NEW 112" WS LINEWMWMP.U.E. / R/W112" CURB STOP W/STD G5 VALVE BOXCONNECT TO IN-TRACT SERVICELINE (TYP) (SEE NOTE 3 & 4) (E)WATER PIPE(E)WATER SERVICE LINE (TYP)
WATER SERVICE LINE TYPE N.T.S.

NOTES1.EXISTING METERS & TRANSMITTER UNITS ARE TO BE RELOCATED AS SHOWN ON THEPLANS. NO NEW WATER METERS ARE PROPOSED WITH THIS PROJECT.2.NEW METER BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED3.WATER SERVICE LINE SHALL BE 1 12 INCH FROM PIPE TO THE 1 12 INCH x 1 INCH TEE SHOWNABOVE. 1 INCH SERVICE LINE SHALL BE INSTALLED FROM TEE, THROUGH METERS, ANDCONNECT TO EXISTING SERVICE LINES.4.REPLACE PRIVATE WATER SERVICE LINE THROUGH THE REMOVAL OF (E)METER BOX.MATCH SIZE AND MATERIAL OF EXISTING IN-TRACT SERVICE LINE. CONNECT TO(E)IN-TRACT SERVICE LINE WITH APPROPRIATE ADAPTER BASED ON SIZE AND MATERIAL.5.SEE GENERAL WS NOTES, BELOW, FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES.

REMOVE & RELOCATE (E)WATER METERS.REMOVE & DISPOSE OF (E)METER BOX.1" SERVICEWMWM PROPOSEDWATER PIPE112" X 1" TEE1" SERVICENEW LOCATION FOR (E)WATERMETER & (N)METER BOX (TYP)CUT AND CAP DOWNSTREAMOF (N)SERVICE TIE-IN (TYP) GENERAL NOTES APPLICABLE TO WATER SERVICE DETAILS 1-3 (ABOVE)1.SERVICE LINE AND COUPLINGS PER CITY STD. DTL. W-5.2.SEE CITY STD. DTL. W-5 FOR OTHER REQUIREMENTS.3.SERVICE SADDLE CONNECTION TO PIPE PER CITY STD. DTL. W-3.4.SAWCUT (E)SIDEWALK, (E)CURB AND (E)GUTTER @ JOINT AND REPLACE IN KIND.5.REPLACE (E)LANDSCAPE IN AREA OF DISTURBANCE IN KIND.6.P.U.E., CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK ONLY PRESENT IN SELECT LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.7.THE PREFERRED NEW LOCATION OF THE METER BOX IS ONE FOOT BEHIND TBW.IF NO SW EXISTS, PLACE METER BOX FIVE FEET BEHIND TBC. IF THESE PARAMETERS CANNOT BE ACHIEVED, METER BOX LOCATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER.WSWSWSWSWSWSWSCUT AND CAP DOWNSTREAM WATER PIPENEW SERVICELINETYPICAL WATER SERVICE LINE INSTALLATIONN.T.S. (E)WATERSERVICE
NOTE: 1' VERTICAL SEPARATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN SERVICELINES AND (E)UTILITIES. (N)METER BOX &RELOCATED (E)METER(N)METER BOX &RELOCATED (E)METER(E)GAS(E)WATER PIPE1' MIN.1' MIN.1' MIN.(E)UTILITIES 36" MIN. COVER TO FG

FOR PIPE TO BE ABANDONED

FOR PIPE TO REMAIN IN SERVICE
6" TYP6" TYP6" TYP(E)PIPE TO BE CUTCOMPACTED BEDDING MATERIALPER SPECIFICATIONS LINE CAP COUPLINGENCASE COUPLINGIN CONCRETEfc=2500psiSAWCUT PIPE TO BEABANDONED PERSPECIFICATIONS 4' MINJOINT TO CUT ENDFOR PIPE NOT TO REMAIN INSERVICE, FILL PIPE ENDW/CONCRETE.MUSHROOM CONCRETE 6"BEYOND END OF PIPE2' MINSAWCUT PIPE & FILE TOREMOVE SHARP EDGES

MODIFIED WATER TRENCH DETAIL
DUCTILEIRON ORPVC PIPETYPE "A"MATERIALLOCATING WIRE#10 COPPER(INSULATED)8" MIN MOUNDED SOIL(E)GROUNDSURFACEEXISTINGPAVINGABPIPE ZONE95% COMPACTIONINTERMEDIATE ZONE95% COMPACTION 42" MIN COVER* (SEE NOTE 4)
12"6"
AC
USE TYPE "B" MATERIAL95% COMPACTION
2' 1'12" TERRATAPE OREQUALLOCATINGTAPE 18" DEEPW/INNON-ROADAREA, 24" W/INROAD AREAS W-1
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.
123
46C03C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNDETAILSCIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.AS NOTEDNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
1 3
2 GENERAL WS NOTES5
CUT AND CAPN.T.S.
56 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION B N.T.S.

NOTES1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.THE MIRRORED VERSION OF THIS CONNECTION DETAIL APPLIES TOTHE CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM EAST OF 5TH STREET.3.CONNECTION TO (E)W SYSTEM ON M STREET IS A BID ALTERNATIVECONNECTIVE. BUILD ONLY IF BID ALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED.8" BLIND FLANGE8" W PIPE8"x8"x4" TEE 4" GATE VALVE
ROLLED 90° BEND4" W PIPE5TH STREET(E)4" W PIPE4" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)4" COUPLINGCUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03) CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION AN.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THRUST BLOCK PER CITYSTANDARD DETAIL W-6A AT BLIND FLANGE.NOTES 8" W PIPE(E)8"x8"x6" TEE(E)8" W PIPE(E)6" GATE VALVETO BE SALVAGED

L STREET
(E)6" W PIPECUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03) 6" BLIND FLANGESALVAGE (E) 8" BLIND FLANGE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION DN.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THRUST BLOCK PER CITYSTANDARD DETAIL W-6A AT BLIND FLANGE.NOTES 10" W PIPE(E) 10"x10"x4" TEE(E)10" W PIPE(E)4" GATE VALVETO BE SALVAGED(E)ROLLED90° BEND(E)4" COUPLING(E)4" W PIPE(E)4" W PIPE(E)4" W PIPE 3RD STREETCUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03) 4" BLIND FLANGESLAVAGE (E) 10" BLIND FLANGE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION GN.T.S.NOTES1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THRUST BLOCK PER CITYSTANDARD DETAIL W-6A AT BLIND FLANGE. 3RD STREET
10" W PIPE(E)10" W PIPE(E)10"x10"x4" TEE
(E)4" W PIPE
ROLLED 45° BEND10" W PIPE
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)(E)4" GATE VALVETO BE SALVAGED4" BLIND FLANGESALVAGE (E) 10" BLIND FLANGE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION JN.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.NOTES 8" BLIND FLANGE8" W PIPE8" TEE8" GATE VALVE
ROLLED 90° BEND8" W PIPE4TH STREET8" COUPLING(E)8" W PIPE8" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03) CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION HN.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.THE ROTATED VERSION OF THIS CONNECTION DETAIL APPLIESTO THE CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM SOUTH OF 4TH STREET.NOTES R STREET10" COUPLING(E)10" W PIPE10" BLIND FLANGE10" TEE10" W PIPE10" GATE VALVEROLLED 90° BEND10" W PIPE10" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1) CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION KN.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.NOTES Q STREET10" COUPLING(E)10" W PIPE10" BLIND FLANGE10" TEE10" W PIPE 10" GATE VALVEROLLED 90° BEND10" W PIPE
10" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)
ROLLED 90°BEND4" COUPLING4" W PIPE8" BLIND FLANGE8"x8"x4" TEE8" W PIPE (E)4" W PIPE
4" GATE VALVE4" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)

K STREET
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION EN.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.NOTES ROLLED 90°BEND6" COUPLING6" W PIPE8" BLIND FLANGE8"x8"x6" TEE8" W PIPE (E)6" W PIPE
6" GATE VALVE
NOTES
6" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)

K STREET
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION FN.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.

CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION LN.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.THE MIRRORED VERSION OF THIS CONNECTION DETAIL APPLIESTO THE CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM SOUTH OF 4TH STREET.NOTES ROLLED 90° BEND8" W PIPEP STREET8" COUPLING(E)8" W PIPE8" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)8" GATE VALVE 8" BLIND FLANGE
8" TEE8" W PIPEROLLED 90°BEND6" COUPLING
6" WPIPE10"x10"x6" TEE10" BLIND FLANGE
10" W PIPE
6" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)6" GATEVALVE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION M N.T.S.
(E)6" W PIPE1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.NOTES (E)6" W PIPEO STREET
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION C N.T.S.NOTES1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.

L STREET8" BLIND FLANGE8" W PIPE8"x8"x6" TEE
(E)4" W PIPE4" COUPLING4" W PIPE6" GATE VALVE6" W PIPEROLLED 6"x6"x4" TEE6" W PIPE(E)6" W PIPE6" COUPLING6" W PIPEROLLED 90° BEND DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

A
C04C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNCONNECTION DETAILSCIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.AS NOTEDNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTALBCD

H G F E
KM JL
57 ROLLED 90°BEND6" COUPLING
6" W PIPE
8" BLIND FLANGE8"x8"x6" TEE8" W PIPE
(E)6" W PIPE6" GATE VALVE
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION ON.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.THE MIRRORED VERSION OF THIS CONNECTION DETAIL APPLIESTO THE CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM SOUTH OF 4TH STREET.NOTES 6" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)

N STREET
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)
(E)ROLLED16"x16"x8" TEE
(E) ROLLED 90°REDUCING BEND
4TH STREET(E)16" W PIPE
(E)16" W PIPE
(E)16" TEE(E)16" W PIPE(E)8" GATE VALVETO BE SALVAGED16" W PIPEREMOVE (E) 16" BLIND FLANGE (E)10" GATE VALVETO BE SALVAGED10" BLIND FLANGE
10" BLIND FLANGE
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03) 16" BLIND FLANGE NOTES1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THRUST BLOCK PER CITYSTANDARD DETAIL W-6A AT BLIND FLANGE.N.T.S.CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION S8" W PIPE8" W PIPE8"x8"x6" TEE6" GATE VALVE6" W PIPE(E) FIREDEPARTMENTCONNECTION

L STREET
CONNECT TO EXISTING FIRE SERVICE - LOCATION ZN.T.S.
8" BLIND FLANGE8" W PIPE8"x8"x4" TEE4" GATE VALVE
ROLLED 90° BEND4" W PIPE
5TH STREET
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION U N.T.S.NOTES1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY. (E)4" W PIPE4" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)4" COUPLINGCUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)BID ALTERNATIVE DETAILBUILD ONLY IF BID ALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED 10"x8" CROSS10" W PIPE6" W PIPE8"x6" REDUCER8" GATE VALVE8" W PIPEROLLED 90° BEND8" COUPLING(E)8" W PIPE(E)6" W PIPE6" COUPLINGROLLED 90° BEND6" GATEVALVE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION N N.T.S.
8" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)6" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)10" BLINDFLANGE

1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.NOTESO STREET CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03) CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03) ROLLED 90°BEND4" COUPLING4" W PIPE8" BLIND FLANGE8"x8"x4" TEE8" W PIPE (E)4" W PIPE
4" GATE VALVE4" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)

K STREET
CUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION RN.T.S.1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.THE MIRRORED VERSION OF THIS CONNECTION DETAIL APPLIESTO THE CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM NORTH OF 4TH STREET.NOTES CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION T N.T.S.NOTES1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THRUST BLOCK PER CITYSTANDARD DETAIL W-6A AT BLIND FLANGE. 8" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)8"x8"x6" TEE(E)8" W PIPE(E)6" GATE VALVETO BE SALVAGED(E)6" W PIPEM STREETCUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03) BID ALTERNATIVE DETAILBUILD ONLY IF BID ALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED 6" BLIND FLANGESALVAGE (E) 8" BLIND FLANGE
8" BLIND FLANGE8" W PIPE8"x8"x6" TEE6" GATE VALVE
ROLLED 90° BEND6" W PIPE5TH STREET
CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION V N.T.S.NOTES1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY. (E)6" W PIPE6" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)6" COUPLINGCUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)

BID ALTERNATIVE DETAILBUILD ONLY IF BID ALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SYSTEM - LOCATION P N.T.S.NOTES1.INSTALL VERTICAL BEND TO MATCH (E)W PIPE CONNECTIONELEVATION, IF NECESSARY.2.THE MIRRORED VERSION OF THIS CONNECTION DETAIL MAYAPPLY PER PLAN CONFIGURATION. 8" BLIND FLANGE8" W PIPE8"x8"x6" TEE6" GATE VALVE
ROLLED 90° BEND6" W PIPEM STREET
(E)6" W PIPE6" W PIPE(SEE NOTE 1)6" COUPLINGCUT & CAP (E)WATER(SEE DETAIL 6, SHEET C03)BASE BID DETAILBUILD ONLY IF BID ALTERNATIVE IS NOT SELECTEDDRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

N
C05C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNCONNECTION DETAILSCIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.AS NOTEDNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTALOPR
S TU
Z V
58 WWWW ABNABNABN
W
SSSSSS
WWSD

SDSDSDWW
W
WWW
W

WWWWWWWW
W
GASGAS
GAS

GASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
OHEOHE
OHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE
OHEOHE
OHE
OHEOHE
OHEOHE
OHE
OHE

SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD
D
D1
2 3
4 5
6 5050
50 50
50 50

SDSDSDSDSDSD
SDSD

WWWWWWW
W

WWWWWWWWW
WW

GASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
GASGAS
OHE
OHEOHE
OHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
OHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
D
D
7 8
9 10
11 50
50 50
50 50
11+26
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

L ST
L ST
(SEE THIS SHEET)MATCHLINE STA. 6+50
MATCHLINE STA. 6+50(SEE THIS SHEET)
5TH ST
5TH ST
3RD ST
3RD ST(SEE SHEET C08)4TH ST(SEE SHEET C10)
4TH ST(SEE SHEET C10)
C06C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNDEMOLITION PLAN - L STCIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.1' = 30'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
15'SCALE IN FEET030'60'
PLAN SCALE:008-073-004304 L ST008-073-022330 L ST008-073-021342 L ST008-073-007354 L ST008-073-006368 L ST008-073-009378 L ST 008-111-0231190 & 1160 3RD ST008-111-022313 & 315 L ST008-111-008311 & 331 L ST008-111-012349 L ST008-111-015357 L ST008-111-014008-111-020379 L ST008-111-0211174 &1176 4TH ST 008-073-008390 L ST
008-066-016418 L ST008-066-010432 L ST008-066-005444 L ST008-066-004466 L ST008-066-003 008-102-005407 L ST008-102-006419 L ST008-102-007431 L ST008-102-008443 L ST008-102-009461 L ST 008-066-017408 L ST
008-102-005407 L ST
008-102-010479 L ST
008-066-0181299 5TH ST
008-101-001
008-065-0151222 5TH ST 008-066-017408 L ST1.WATER LINES ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY. CONTRACTOR TOPOTHOLE EXISTING WATERLINES TO CONFIRM EXACT SIZE,MATERIAL, DEPTH AND LOCATION OF WHERE ABANDONMENT WILLOCCUR.2.WATER METERS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TO BE FIELDVERIFIED. REFER TO WATER SERVICE LOCATIONS ON PLAN ANDPROFILE SHEETS FOR SPECIFICS REGARDING SERVICE SIZE ANDLOCATION. ANY CHANGES TO METER LOCATION AND/OR SIZESHALL HAVE WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.3.EXISTING WATER PIPE, WATER SERVICES AND FIRE HYDRANTS ARETO REMAIN IN SERVICE WHILE NEW SERVICES, WATER PIPES ANDFIRE HYDRANTS ARE INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ACONNECTION AND ABANDONMENT PLAN TO THE CITY FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY SYSTEM OUTAGES OR CONNECTIONS.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CROSS OVERS TO NEWSYSTEM WITH CITY AND MINIMIZE OUTAGE DURATIONS.4.EXISTING WATER SYSTEM TO BE PROTECTED IN-PLACE UNTILPROPOSED SYSTEM IS PUT INTO SERVICE.5.A MINIMUM OF 2 CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING SYSTEM AREREQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY SERVICE OR FIRE HYDRANT CROSSOVERS.6.EMPTY METER/UTILITY BOXES SHALL BE REMOVED AND SITERESTORED TO MATCH ADJACENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRMWITH CITY REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE REMOVING.7.ALL EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE LINES TO BE ABANDONEDSHALL BE CUT AND CAPPED PER DETAILS 1-3 ON SHEET C03. 8.DEMOLISH, DISMANTLE AND REMOVE THE FIRE HYDRANT DOWN TOTHE BURIED HYDRANT ELBOW. CAP (E)FIRE HYDRANT ELBOW PERDETAIL 6 ON SHEET C03.

SYMBOLS ENLARGED FOR CLARITYABANDON (E)WATERLINE IN-PLACE ABANDON (E)APPURTENANCE

PROTECT IN PLACE (E)WATER VALVEPROTECT IN PLACE (E)FIRE HYDRANT LEGEND
CUT AND CAP (E)WATERLINE(SEE DETAIL 6 ON SHEET C03) ABANDON (E)FIRE HYDRANT(SEE NOTES 3 & 8, THIS SHEET)

SALVAGE (E)VALVE
W
8"W10"W
4"W6"W
10"W
4"W6"W8"W10"W14"W
4"W12"W
27"SD30"SD27"SD
16"SD
12"SD
12"SD
12"SD10"SD10"SD4"W6"W
(E)6" ACP(E)4" CIP(E)4" ACP(E)6" ACP(E)10" ACP(E)8" ACP (E)14" ACP
(E)4" ACP(E)12" ACP(E)4" PVC
(E)4" STL
6"W4"W(E)4" ACP(E)6" ACP
59 WWABNABNSSSS

WWW WWWWWWWW
W
SDSD

ABNABNABNABNABNABNABN
ABN

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
GASGAS
GAS
1 2
3 4
5 6
50 50
50 50
50 50
WW

WWWWWWWW
W

ABNABNABNABNABNABNABNABNABN

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASOHEOHEOHEGAS
7 8
9 10
11 5050
5050
50 11+16
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

M ST
M ST
(SEE THIS SHEET)MATCHLINE STA. 6+50
MATCHLINE STA. 6+50(SEE THIS SHEET)
5TH ST
5TH ST
3RD ST
3RD ST4TH ST(SEE SHEET C10)
4TH ST(SEE SHEET C10)
C07C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNDEMOLITION PLAN - M ST (BID ALT)CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.1' = 30'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
15'SCALE IN FEET030'60'
PLAN SCALE:008-072-0141320 3RD ST008-072-019
008-073-0131270 3RD ST
008-072-018348 M ST008-072-017364 M ST008-072-0121325 4TH ST 008-073-017331 M ST008-073-016345 M ST008-073-020355 M ST008-073-018365 M ST008-073-0141291 4TH ST 008-064-0111320 4TH ST008-064-017412 M ST
008-066-0201276 4TH ST
008-064-016430 M ST008-064-025448 M ST008-064-024464 M ST 008-066-014425 M ST008-066-013445 M ST008-066-008461 M ST 008-066-019
008-064-0111320 4TH ST
008-066-0201276 4TH ST
008-064-0021321 5TH ST
008-066-0221299 5TH ST008-066-021008-065-0051290 5TH ST 008-063-012512 M ST 1.WATER LINES ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY. CONTRACTOR TOPOTHOLE EXISTING WATERLINES TO CONFIRM EXACT SIZE,MATERIAL, DEPTH AND LOCATION OF WHERE ABANDONMENT WILLOCCUR.2.WATER METERS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TO BE FIELDVERIFIED. REFER TO WATER SERVICE LOCATIONS ON PLAN ANDPROFILE SHEETS FOR SPECIFICS REGARDING SERVICE SIZE ANDLOCATION. ANY CHANGES TO METER LOCATION AND/OR SIZESHALL HAVE WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.3.EXISTING WATER PIPE, WATER SERVICES AND FIRE HYDRANTS ARETO REMAIN IN SERVICE WHILE NEW SERVICES, WATER PIPES ANDFIRE HYDRANTS ARE INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ACONNECTION AND ABANDONMENT PLAN TO THE CITY FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY SYSTEM OUTAGES OR CONNECTIONS.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CROSS OVERS TO NEWSYSTEM WITH CITY AND MINIMIZE OUTAGE DURATIONS.4.EXISTING WATER SYSTEM TO BE PROTECTED IN-PLACE UNTILPROPOSED SYSTEM IS PUT INTO SERVICE.5.A MINIMUM OF 2 CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING SYSTEM AREREQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY SERVICE OR FIRE HYDRANT CROSSOVERS.6.EMPTY METER/UTILITY BOXES SHALL BE REMOVED AND SITERESTORED TO MATCH ADJACENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRMWITH CITY REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE REMOVING.7.ALL EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE LINES TO BE ABANDONEDSHALL BE CUT AND CAPPED PER DETAILS 1-3 ON SHEET C03. 8.DEMOLISH, DISMANTLE AND REMOVE THE FIRE HYDRANT DOWN TOTHE BURIED HYDRANT ELBOW. CAP (E)FIRE HYDRANT ELBOW PERDETAIL 6 ON SHEET C03.

SYMBOLS ENLARGED FOR CLARITYABANDON (E)WATERLINE IN-PLACE ABANDON (E)APPURTENANCE

PROTECT IN PLACE (E)WATER VALVEPROTECT IN PLACE (E)FIRE HYDRANT LEGEND
CUT AND CAP (E)WATERLINE(SEE DETAIL 6 ON SHEET C03) ABANDON (E)FIRE HYDRANT(SEE NOTES 3 & 8, THIS SHEET)

SALVAGE (E)VALVE
W
6"W(E)6" ACP(E)14" ACP
(E)14" ACP(E)6" ACP
10"W10"W30"SD
14"W14"W6"W
6"W(E)6" ACP(E)4" DIP(E)6" CIP
(E)4" PVC4"W6"W4"W
(E) CROSS VALLEY GUTTER
BID ALTERNATIVE BOUNDARY(SEE NOTE 9, THIS SHEET)

9. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE BID ALTERNATIVE BOUNDARY WILL BE DEMOLISHED ONLY IF THE BID ALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED. 60 WWWWWWWWWW
ABNW
WW W

SSSSSSSS
SSSS
SD

SDSDSDSDSD

SSSSSSSSSS
SS
SSSD
SDSD
W

SSSSABNABN SSS SS
WW

GASGASGAS
GASGAS
OHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE
OHEOHE
OHEOHE

OHEOHEOHE
OHE
OHEOHE
OHE
SD
DD
D
D
12345678
50 50
505050
5050
0150
8+42
SS

WWW WWWW

SDSSSSSSSS
SSSSS

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
2"
1 2
3 4
50 50
50 DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.
3RD STJ ST
J ST
L ST(SEE SHEET C06)
L ST
K ST
K ST
C08C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNDEMOLITION PLAN - 3RD ST & STEPHANIE CTCIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.1' = 30'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
STEPHANIE CT4TH ST(SEE SHEET C09)
4TH ST(SEE SHEET C09)
021-440-0531512 4TH ST021-440-052420 STEPHANIE CT
021-440-0441508 4TH ST021-440-045411 STEPHANIE CT
021-440-046431 STEPHANIE CT021-440-047441 STEPHANIE CT021-440-048461 STEPHANIE CT021-440-049450 STEPHANIE CT 021-440-050440 STEPHANIE CT021-440-051430 STEPHANIE CT
008-111-0231190 & 1160 3RD ST008-111-006306 3RD ST
008-251-007 3RD ST008-251-001290 K ST008-253-0091081 3RD ST 008-112-006307 K ST008-112-005306 J ST
008-253-001284 J ST
15'SCALE IN FEET030'60'
PLAN SCALE:

1.WATER LINES ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY. CONTRACTOR TOPOTHOLE EXISTING WATERLINES TO CONFIRM EXACT SIZE,MATERIAL, DEPTH AND LOCATION OF WHERE ABANDONMENT WILLOCCUR.2.WATER METERS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE TO BE FIELDVERIFIED. REFER TO WATER SERVICE LOCATIONS ON PLAN ANDPROFILE SHEETS FOR SPECIFICS REGARDING SERVICE SIZE ANDLOCATION. ANY CHANGES TO METER LOCATION AND/OR SIZESHALL HAVE WRITTEN APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER.3.EXISTING WATER PIPE, WATER SERVICES AND FIRE HYDRANTS ARETO REMAIN IN SERVICE WHILE NEW SERVICES, WATER PIPES ANDFIRE HYDRANTS ARE INSTALLED. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ACONNECTION AND ABANDONMENT PLAN TO THE CITY FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY SYSTEM OUTAGES OR CONNECTIONS.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CROSS OVERS TO NEWSYSTEM WITH CITY AND MINIMIZE OUTAGE DURATIONS.4.EXISTING WATER SYSTEM TO BE PROTECTED IN-PLACE UNTILPROPOSED SYSTEM IS PUT INTO SERVICE.5.A MINIMUM OF 2 CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING SYSTEM AREREQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY SERVICE OR FIRE HYDRANT CROSSOVERS.6.EMPTY METER/UTILITY BOXES SHALL BE REMOVED AND SITERESTORED TO MATCH ADJACENT. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRMWITH CITY REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE REMOVING.7.ALL EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE LINES TO BE ABANDONEDSHALL BE CUT AND CAPPED PER DETAILS 1-3 ON SHEET C03. 8.DEMOLISH, DISMANTLE AND REMOVE THE FIRE HYDRANT DOWN TOTHE BURIED HYDRANT ELBOW. CAP (E)FIRE HYDRANT ELBOW PERDETAIL 6 ON SHEET C03.

SYMBOLS ENLARGED FOR CLARITYABANDON (E)WATERLINE IN-PLACE ABANDON (E)APPURTENANCE

PROTECT IN PLACE (E)WATER VALVEPROTECT IN PLACE (E)FIRE HYDRANT LEGEND
CUT AND CAP (E)WATERLINE(SEE DETAIL 6 ON SHEET C03) ABANDON (E)FIRE HYDRANT(SEE NOTES 3 & 8, THIS SHEET)

SALVAGE (E)VALVE
W
12"SD
(E)6" ACP(E)4" CIP(E)4" CIP(E)4" CIP(E)4" STL
(E)6" ACP
10"W27"SD8"W
4"W6"W
4"W
4"W
10"W10"SS10"SS10"SS12"SS12"SS12"SS
12"SS
6"SS6"SS 12"SS
27"SD
27"SD
24"SD
24"SD
8"SD
16"SD
6"SS6"SS
24"SD24"SD
6"SS10"SD12"SD14"W14"W
6"W(E)6" ACP
61 SSSSSSSSSS

SSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD
WWWWWW
WWW
WSD

SSSSSSSS S
S
SS
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS

GASGASGASGASGASGASGAS DD
1 2
3 4
5 50
50 50
50 50
SSSS
SDSD

SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS
W
WWWW
W
WWW
W
WW
SSSS

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

SS SSSSS
GAS

GASGASGASGASGASGAS

GASGASGASGAS
GAS
GASDDD
6 7
8 9
10 11
50 50
50 50
50 SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD
SD

SSSSSSSSSSSS
WWWWWW
W
WWWWW
WW
WW
WW
WWW
SDSSSS

SSSSSSSSSSSS
SS

SSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDS
SSS
S

GASGASGAS
GAS

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
GAS
GAS

GASGASGAS

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
OHE
D
D
12 13
14 15
16 17
50 50
50 50
50 50
17+25
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.
4TH ST
MATCHLINE STA. 11+50(SEE THIS SHEET)
(SEE THIS SHEET)MATCHLINE STA. 11+50
O ST
O ST
4TH ST
4TH ST
MATCHLINE STA. 6+00(SEE THIS SHEET)R ST
R ST(SEE THIS SHEET)MATCHLINE STA. 6+00STEPHANIE CT(SEE SHEET C08) MATCHLINE STA. 17+25(SEE SHEET C10)
C09C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNDEMOLITION PLAN - 4TH ST 1+00 TO 17+25CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.1' = 30'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
P ST

P STQ ST
021-536-0231700 4TH ST
021-537-0081701 4TH ST021-535-002399 R ST
021-534-001401 R ST021-440-0151618 4TH ST021-440-0141616 4TH ST021-440-0131614 4TH ST021-440-0121612 4TH ST 021-440-0171617 4TH ST021-440-0181615 4TH ST021-440-0191613 4TH ST021-440-0201611 4TH ST 021-440-0111610 4TH ST
021-440-0211609 4TH ST021-440-0221607 4TH ST021-440-0231605 4TH ST021-440-0241603 4TH ST021-440-0251601 4TH ST 021-440-065400 P ST021-440-066401 Q ST021-440-055401 P ST 021-440-0261519 4TH ST021-440-0271517 4TH ST021-440-0281515 4TH ST 021-440-0291513 4TH ST021-440-0301511 4TH ST021-440-0311509 4TH ST021-440-0321507 4TH ST021-440-0331505 4TH ST 021-440-0541514 4TH ST021-440-0531512 4TH ST
021-440-0441508 4TH ST021-440-0431506 4TH ST021-440-0421504 4TH ST021-440-0401500 4TH ST 021-440-0351501 4TH ST008-071-011385 O ST
008-062-012415 & 418 O ST 021-440-0531512 4TH ST021-440-0411502 4TH ST 021-440-0341503 4TH ST
15'SCALE IN FEET030'60'
PLAN SCALE:

SYMBOLS ENLARGED FOR CLARITYABANDON (E)WATERLINE IN-PLACE ABANDON (E)APPURTENANCE

PROTECT IN PLACE (E)WATER VALVEPROTECT IN PLACE (E)FIRE HYDRANT LEGEND
CUT AND CAP (E)WATERLINE(SEE DETAIL 6 ON SHEET C03) ABANDON (E)FIRE HYDRANT(SEE NOTES 3 & 8, THIS SHEET)

SALVAGE (E)VALVE
W
6"SS
66"SD10"W
(E)14" ACP(E)8" PVC(E)10" ACP
(E)10" ACP
(E)14" ACP(E)10" ACP(E)14" ACP(E)14" ACP(E)8" ACP
(E)8" ACP
(E)14" ACP(E)14" ACP(E)14" ACP(E)14" ACP(E)6" ACP(E)8" ACP (E)6" ACP (E)6" ACP 54"SD
54"SD
54"SD
48"SD
48"SD
12"SD10"SD10"SD12"SD
48"SD
48"SD
10"SD12"SD
36"SD
36"SD18"SD18"SD
12"SD
4"SS
6"SS
6"SS
15"SS
4"SS10"SS18"SS
6"SS
15"SS
6"SS
8"SS
6"SS
6"SS15"SS
15"SS
15"SS6"SS15"SS
10"W
14"W14"W
14"W10"W
14"W
14"W
14"W
14"W
14"W6"W
14"W
021-440-0161619 4TH ST
8"W8"W
8"W6"W6"W
62 W W
SDSD
SDSDSD
SD D

WWWWWWWWWWWSSSSSS
SSSS
S
GAS

GASGASGASGAS
GAS
GASGAS

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE D
18 19
20 21
22 50
50 50
50 50
17+25
WW
SS
WWW
WWWWWW
WW
WW W
SDWW
SSS
W
ABN
GASGAS

GASGASGAS
GAS
GASGAS
GASGAS
OHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHESDSD
D
23 24
25 26
27 28
50 50
50 50
50 50
WWWWW
WWWWWW
WW W
ABN
ABN
SS

WWWWWWWWWWWW
ABNABN
SSSS
SS

ABNABNABN SS

WWWWWGASGASGASGAS

GASGASGAS

GASGASGASGAS

ABNABNABNABN
GAS

GASOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE
OHEOHE

OHEOHEOHE
29 30
31 32
33 34
50 50
50 50
50 50
5034+75
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.
4TH ST
(SEE THIS SHEET)MATCHLINE STA. 28+25
J ST
J ST
4TH ST
4TH ST
N ST
N ST
K ST
C10C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNDEMOLITION PLAN - 4TH ST 17+50 TO 34+75CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.1' = 30'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE THIS SHEET)MATCHLINE STA. 22+25(SEE SHEET C09)MATCHLINE STA. 17+25 MATCHLINE STA. 28+25(SEE THIS SHEET)
MATCHLINE STA. 22+25(SEE THIS SHEET)
K ST
M ST(SEE SHEET C07)
M ST(SEE SHEET C07)L ST(SEE SHEET C06)
L ST(SEE SHEET C06)
008-062-0081440 4TH ST
008-071-0091441 4TH ST008-071-010384 N ST008-072-009379 N ST008-072-0041365 4TH ST008-072-0121325 4TH ST 008-062-006412 N ST008-064-014413 N ST008-064-013008-064-0111320 4TH ST 008-071-0151461 4TH ST
008-062-0131460 4TH ST
008-072-0121325 4TH ST
008-064-0111320 4TH ST008-066-0201276 4TH ST008-066-017408 L ST 008-073-0141291 4TH ST008-073-0151261 4TH ST008-073-008390 L ST 008-102-005407 L ST
008-102-0161140 4TH ST008-102-0131120 4TH ST
008-111-0111121 4TH ST
008-111-0211174 & 1176 4TH ST
008-102-005407 L ST
008-111-0211174 & 1176 4TH ST008-112-012391 K ST008-112-001384 J ST 008-103-005410 J ST008-103-0061080 4TH ST
15'SCALE IN FEET030'60'
PLAN SCALE:

SYMBOLS ENLARGED FOR CLARITYABANDON (E)WATERLINE IN-PLACE ABANDON (E)APPURTENANCE

PROTECT IN PLACE (E)WATER VALVEPROTECT IN PLACE (E)FIRE HYDRANT LEGEND
CUT AND CAP (E)WATERLINE(SEE DETAIL 6 ON SHEET C03) ABANDON (E)FIRE HYDRANT(SEE NOTES 3 & 8, THIS SHEET)

SALVAGE (E)VALVE
W
6"SS14"W(E)14" ACP(E)14" ACP
(E)14" ACP(E)14" ACP(E)8" ACP(E)10" ACP(E)4" ACP(E)12" ACP (E)4" STL(E)4" CIP
(E)8" ACP(E)10" ACP(E)8" ACP(E)10" ACP(E)4" STL
(E)4" CIP
14"W
6"W6"W
14"W
14"W
8"W10"W
4"W12"W4"W
8"W10"W
8"W10"W
16"W
4"W4"W
36"SD
6"SS
12"SS12"SS
8"SS8"SS
6"SS6"SS
6"SS6"SS
36"SD
30"SD18"SD18"SD(E)6" ACP
(E)6" ACP
(E)6" ACP
(E)6" ACP6"W6"W
(E) CROSS VALLEY GUTTER
BID ALTERNATIVE BOUNDARY(SEE NOTE 9, THIS SHEET)

9. IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE BID ALTERNATIVE BOUNDARY WILL BE DEMOLISHED ONLY IF THE BID ALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED. 6"W4"W(E)6" ACP
63 WWWWW ABNABNABNABNW SSSSSSSSSS SDSDSD
WWWWW
WWW

WWWWWWWWW
SD
GAS
GAS
GAS
GAS

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS

OHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE
OHE

SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD
D12
3 4 50
50 50
50 0150
8"W
30"SD12"SD27"SD27"SD12"SD
6"W
4"W
10"W10"W
16"SD
WS 1+80WS 1+77
WS 2+17WS 2+26WS 2+29
WS 2+62WS 2+84WS 2+98WS 3+23
WS 3+58WS 3+66
WS 4+12
1+83.43 (6.9' R) 45° BEND2+12.39 (22.0' L) 45° BEND WS 3+96
1+001+502+002+503+003+504+004+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► +26.14 (E)SD XING
(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)6" W(E)4" W
(E)16" SD
146.84146.88146.92146.96147.02147.08147.13147.18147.22147.26147.31147.35147.39147.43147.47147.52147.56147.60147.64147.68147.72147.77147.81147.85147.89147.93147.98148.02148.06148.10148.14 (E)149.11(E)149.08(E)149.11(E)149.21(E)149.82(E)150.38(E)150.44(E)150.54(E)150.67(E)151.24(E)150.90(E)150.71(E)150.83(E)150.96(E)151.02(E)151.09(E)151.15(E)151.21(E)151.28(E)151.34(E)151.41(E)151.47(E)151.53(E)151.56(E)151.59(E)151.62(E)151.64(E)151.68(E)151.70(E)151.73(E)151.76(E)151.81(E)151.82(E)151.84(E)151.86(E)151.87 +45.81 CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM
(E)27" SD XING
(E)8" W
316.1 LF OF 8" PVC C-900(DR-14)
LINE DATA#L1BEARINGN0° 27' 17"WLENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L8L9L10BEARINGN0° 29' 41"WN45° 21' 26"WN0° 30' 44"WLENGTH37.61'40.90'237.61'SIZE8"8"8"DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

L ST3RD ST(SEE SHEET C17)
3RD ST
C11C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - L ST STA 1+00 TO 4+50CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
MATCHLINE STA. 4+50(SEE SHEET C12) 008-073-004304 L ST008-073-022330 L ST008-073-021342 L ST008-073-007354 L ST008-073-006368 L ST 008-111-0231190 & 1160 3RD ST008-111-022313 & 315 L ST008-111-008311 & 331 L ST008-111-012349 L ST008-111-015357 L ST008-111-014 130140150160
130140150160
10'SCALE IN FEET040'
20'PLAN SCALE:
11SHEET NOTES:1.SEE SHEET C17 FOR 3RD ST IMPROVEMENTS.
1 A3 311
111
1 PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
D
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:ACONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 2 - A·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL A, SHEET C04. DCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 2 - D·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL D, SHEET C04.

W WWWSD

SDSDSDSD
WW
W
WWWWWW

WWWWWWWWW

GASGASGASGAS
GAS
GAS
GAS

GASGASGASGASGASGAS
GAS
GASGAS

OHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE
OHEOHE
OHEOHE
OHEOHE
SDSDSDSDSDD275050
5 6
7 8
50 50
50 50
8"W
8"W
16"W16"W
16"SD
12"SD
8"W
12"W4"W
10"W1213141513A
121113
6"W4"W
14"W
WS 4+73WS 4+71
WS 5+07WS 5+17
WS 6+55WS 6+64WS 6+68
WS 7+16WS 7+27WS 7+30
WS 8+01
5+89.66 (21.9' L)16" X 8" CROSS(2) 8" GATE VALVES (NORTH, SOUTH)(2) 16" BTFLY VALVES (EAST, WEST)5+52.23 (38.1' L)1" ARV PER CITY STDDWG W-8 4+505+005+506+006+507+007+508+00
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► +97.89 (E)W XING
(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)2" GAS(E)6" W(E)4" W(E)12" W(E)12" SD 148.14148.19148.23148.27148.31148.35148.39148.44148.48148.52148.56148.57148.57146.42145.61145.61147.29149.09149.18149.27149.36149.45149.53149.62149.71149.83149.97150.11150.24150.38150.52150.65150.79150.93151.06151.20 (E)151.87(E)151.91(E)151.96(E)152.00(E)152.05(E)152.12(E)152.21(E)152.27(E)152.28(E)152.26(E)152.19(E)152.19(E)152.46(E)152.67(E)152.59(E)152.46(E)152.55(E)152.70(E)152.83(E)152.93(E)153.03(E)153.14(E)153.26(E)153.37(E)153.48(E)153.59(E)153.71(E)153.84(E)153.98(E)154.12(E)154.26(E)154.40(E)154.52(E)154.63(E)154.73(E)154.84 +89.66 16"x8" CROSS
(E)16" SD(E)4" W(E)14" W XING
350.0 LF OF 8" PVC C-900(DR-14)ELEV: 144.9ELEV: 147.8ELEV: 144.9ELEV: 148.3 +62.91 22.5° FITTING+55.45 22.5° FITTING
+05.94 22.5° FITTING+14.22 22.5° FITTING
1"+52.31 1"ARV
LINE DATA#L2L4L6BEARINGN0° 27' 17"WN1° 13' 27"WN0° 33' 18"WLENGTH105.09'37.67'194.69'CURVE DATA#C2C1LENGTH5.84'6.71'RADIUS500.00'500.00'DELTA0°40'08"0°46'10" CLCLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L11L12BEARINGN0° 30' 44"WN0° 34' 23"WLENGTH139.40'210.60'SIZE8"8" DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.
4TH ST(SEE SHEET C26)
C12C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - L ST STA 4+50 TO 8+00CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
MATCHLINE STA. 8+00(SEE SHEET C13)
(SEE SHEET C11)MATCHLINE STA. 4+50
4TH ST(SEE SHEET C26)
008-111-0211174 &1176 4TH ST
008-073-008390 L ST008-066-017408 L ST008-066-016418 L ST008-066-010432 L ST 008-102-005407 L ST008-102-006419 L ST008-102-007431 L ST L ST
130140150160
130140150160
008-066-005444 L ST
008-102-008443 L ST
008-073-009378 L ST
008-111-020379 L ST
10'SCALE IN FEET040'
20'PLAN SCALE:
1212 1233 2 1SHEET NOTES:1.SEE SHEET C26 FOR 4TH ST IMPROVEMENTS11 111
31 11PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.######
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 12 12
13a
65 W
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSD
SD
SD
SD
W
W
WWWW
W
W
WWW
WW
WWWW
W W
W
GAS
GASGAS
GAS
GASGAS
GASGAS
GASGAS
GAS
GAS
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE OHE
OHEOHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
OHE
D
D
89 10
11 505050
8"W
8"W8"W8"W
12"SD
10"SD10"SD
12"SD
4"W4"W
12"W
4"W
1415
161718
6"W
WS 8+01 WS 8+04
WS 8+47WS 8+56
10+72.13 (19.0' R)8" TEE(3) 8" GATE VALVES
11+02.56 (19.0' R)8"x8"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (WEST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH) 10+72.26 (49.4' L)8"x8"x4" TEE(1) 4" GATE VALVE (NORTH)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (WEST) 10+72.07 (44.9' R)8"x8"x4" TEE(1) 4" GATE VALVE (NORTH)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (EAST) 11+02.54 (14.5' R)6"x6"x4" TEE
10+78.33 (49.4' L) 90° BEND
10+76.04 (44.9' R) 90° BEND
10+72.20 (21.9' L)8" TEE(3) 8" GATE VALVES
WS 10+09
11+25 9+33.05 (21.9' L)8"x8"x6"TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE
WS 8+75
10+95.13 (52.0' L)1" ARV PER CITY STDDWG W-86"W4"W
8+008+509+009+5010+0010+5011+0011+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► +40.39 (E)GAS XING
+78.08 (E)W XING
(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)12" W(E)4" W(E)12" SD 151.20151.33151.42151.47151.50151.54151.57151.60151.63151.66151.69151.72151.75151.83151.91152.00152.09152.18152.26152.29152.30152.30152.30152.30152.30152.30152.30152.30 (E)154.84(E)154.95(E)155.03(E)155.09(E)155.14(E)155.19(E)155.25(E)155.31(E)155.37(E)155.42(E)155.46(E)155.51(E)155.55(E)155.60(E)155.64(E)155.70(E)155.76(E)155.82(E)155.88(E)155.97(E)156.07(E)156.16(E)156.25(E)156.41(E)156.73(E)157.05(E)157.49(E)157.50(E)157.42(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E) +33.05 8"x8"x6" TEE
+72.20 8"x8"x8" TEE
(E)10" SD
(E)4" W XING
(E)2" GAS XING
272.2 LF OF 8" PVC C-900(DR-14)
LINE DATA#L7BEARINGN0° 33' 18"WLENGTH325.00'
CL
POTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L15L17L18L19L20L21L22L23L24L25L26L27L28 BEARINGN0° 34' 23"WS89° 33' 20"WN0° 23' 31"WS89° 35' 14"WN89° 33' 21"EN89° 33' 21"EN0° 37' 27"WN85° 30' 54"EN0° 27' 05"WS89° 11' 57"WS89° 22' 33"WN0° 24' 37"WN0° 24' 37"W LENGTH272.20'27.44'6.08'5.00'44.79'22.08'3.96'5.00'30.43'4.58'5.40'5.00'5.00' SIZE8"8"6"6"8"8"6"6"8"6"6"6"4"6" N89° 25' 37"E61.09'
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OF
REVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFO CHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.
5TH ST
C13C295175.3010
CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - L ST STA 8+00 TO 11+25CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C12)MATCHLINE STA. 8+00
5TH ST 008-066-003
008-102-009461 L ST008-102-010479 L ST
008-066-0181299 5TH ST
008-101-001
008-065-0151222 5TH ST
L ST
140
150
160
170
140
150
160
170
008-066-005444 L ST008-066-004466 L ST
008-102-008443 L ST
10'SCALE IN FEET040'
20'PLAN SCALE:
1 1
11 11
B
B
C

PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:BCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - B·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL B, SHEET C04. CCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - C·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL C, SHEET C04.

SHEET NOTES:1.(E)UTILITY PIPE WAS NOT POTHOLED AT ORADJACENT TO THIS CROSSING LOCATION.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATION PRIOR TOCROSSING AND SHALL MAINTAIN 1' MINIMUMVERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN CROSSING PIPES.

SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.##
####
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 1 59
3 4
2 6
8 7
10121311 12345678910111213
14 (E)4" PVC
(E)4" STL
(E)4" ACP(E)6" ACP
(E)FIRE DEPARTMENTCONNECTION
Z 1
14 123
4 NON-PROFILED UTILITY XING DATA#STATIONOFFSETUTILITYBOTTOM OFUTILITY PIPE ELEVTOP OFWATER PIPE ELEV110+72.1915.1' L(E)GAS155.37152.3 210+72.149.0' R(E)W153.27152.3 3410+72.1314.5' R(E)W153.46152.3 10+72.1125.4' R(E)SD154.26152.3 510+79.2622.9' R(E)W153.46152.3 518a
8"W

COMMERCIAL SERVICE LINE
66 WWW ABNABNABNSSSSSSWWWWWWWW W
SD
SDSDSD

ABNABNABNABNABNABNABNABNABN

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
GAS
GAS
1 2
3 4
50 50
50 50
8"W 19
12"SD30"SD27"SD10"W10"W
6"W
30"SD12"SD1+75.32 (16.4' R)45° BEND
1+81.57 (10.2' R) 45° BEND
WS 2+85
WS 3+34
WS 3+68WS 3+70WS 3+85
WS 4+32
WS 2+48
3+89.91 (28.2' R)1" ARV PER CITY STDDWG W-8
1+001+502+002+503+003+504+004+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)6" W
145.77145.73145.70145.67145.64145.61145.58145.61145.64145.67145.70145.73145.76145.79145.82145.85145.88145.91145.94145.97146.00146.02146.01145.94145.85145.76145.67145.58145.49 (E)(E)(E)(E)148.61(E)148.71(E)148.76(E)148.83(E)148.91(E)149.04(E)149.11(E)149.14(E)149.19(E)149.25(E)149.31(E)149.36(E)149.39(E)149.42(E)149.45(E)149.46(E)149.47(E)149.49(E)149.51(E)149.55(E)149.59(E)149.64(E)149.66(E)149.70(E)149.74(E)149.77(E)149.78(E)149.74(E)149.69(E)149.65(E)149.57(E)149.50(E)149.42 +67.01 CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM
(E) 2" GAS XING
285.6 LF OF 8" PVC C-900(DR-14)
+79.32 (E)GAS XING
1"+89.92 1"ARV
LINE DATA#L1BEARINGN0° 28' 45"WLENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L4L5L6BEARINGN0° 09' 45"WN45° 26' 35"WN0° 28' 29"WLENGTH8.31'8.83'268.43'SIZE8"8"8"DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

M ST
3RD ST
C14C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - M ST (BID ALT) STA 1+00 TO 4+50CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
MATCHLINE STA. 4+50(SEE SHEET C16)
3RD ST
008-072-0141320 3RD ST008-072-019
008-073-0131270 3RD ST
008-072-018348 M ST008-072-017364 M ST
008-073-017331 M ST008-073-016345 M ST008-073-020355 M ST008-073-018365 M ST 130140150160
130140150160
1 PLAN SCALE:10'SCALE IN FEET040'
20'PLAN SCALE:
1 T1111
3 PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
TCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 2 - T·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL T, SHEET C05.

CONSTRUCTION NOTES:8"WBID ALTERNATIVE WATER PIPEAND SIZE (SEE SHEET NOTE 1) 67 WWWW WWWWW
WWWWWW

ABNABNABN

WABNABNABNABNABNABN

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
GASGASGASGAS OHE232450
5 6
7 8
50 50
50 50
8"W
8"W
16"W16"W
0809101120 474814"W6"W
WS 6+45WS 6+41
WS 6+83WS 6+98
WS 7+66WS 7+81WS 7+8923+59.36 (43.1' L)8"x8"x6" TEE (BASE BID ONLY)(1) 6" GATE VALVE (EAST) (BASE BID ONLY)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH) (BASE BID ONLY)23+59.31 (31.3' R)8"x8"x6" TEE (BASE BID ONLY)(1) 6" GATE VALVE (EAST) (BASE BID ONLY)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (SOUTH) (BASE BID ONLY) 23+75.58 (31.3' R)90° BEND (BASE BID ONLY)23+77.83 (43.2' L)90° BEND (BASE BID ONLY) 5+89.01 (10.2' R)16"x8" CROSS(2) 8" GATE VALVES (NORTH, SOUTH)(2) 16" BTFLY VALVES (EAST, WEST) 6"W
14"W
4+505+005+506+006+507+007+508+00
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► +97.91 (E)W XING
(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)6" W
145.49145.40145.31145.22145.13145.04144.95144.86144.77144.68144.63144.60144.57142.13142.13142.13144.77144.87144.97145.07145.16145.26145.36145.46145.56145.66145.76145.86145.96146.05146.15146.26146.39146.54146.69146.84 (E)149.42(E)149.33(E)149.25(E)149.17(E)149.09(E)149.01(E)148.92(E)148.80(E)148.70(E)148.56(E)148.43(E)148.25(E)148.70(E)148.96(E)148.63(E)148.28(E)148.40(E)148.56(E)148.66(E)148.77(E)148.88(E)148.94(E)149.00(E)149.06(E)149.17(E)149.27(E)149.37(E)149.47(E)149.57(E)149.69(E)149.80(E)149.92(E)150.12(E)150.26(E)150.40(E)150.55 +89.01 16"x8" CROSS
(E)14" W XING
+51.54 (E)GAS XING+48.72 8"x8"x6" TEE
+23.14 8"x8"x6" TEE
ELEV: 141.4ELEV: 143.8ELEV: 144.0ELEV: 141.4
+01.57 22.5° FITTING+08.46 22.5° FITTING+79.11 22.5° FITTING+73.20 22.5° FITTING (E)2" GAS XING
350.0 LF OF 8" PVC C-900(DR-14)
LINE DATA#L2BEARINGN0° 28' 45"WLENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L7L8L9L10L21L22BEARINGN0° 28' 29"WN0° 28' 04"WN0° 29' 39"WN0° 28' 45"WN89° 31' 56"ES0° 00' 00"ELENGTH93.27'45.73'34.13'176.86'16.27'5.99'SIZE8"8"8"8"6"6"6"6" 6.00'N0° 26' 28"WN89° 07' 01"E 18.47' DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C15C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - M ST (BID ALT) STA 4+50 TO 8+00CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C14)MATCHLINE STA. 4+50
MATCHLINE STA. 8+00(SEE SHEET C16)
4TH ST(SEE SHEET C25)
4TH ST(SEE SHEET C25)
008-064-0111320 4TH ST008-064-017412 M ST
008-066-0201276 4TH ST
008-064-016430 M ST
008-066-014425 M ST008-066-013445 M ST
008-066-019
008-072-0121325 4TH ST
008-073-0141291 4TH STM ST
130140150160
130140150160
1 PLAN SCALE:10'SCALE IN FEET040'
20'PLAN SCALE:
1SHEET NOTES:1.SEE SHEET C25 FOR 4TH ST IMPROVEMENTS.2.ALL SERVICE LINES & APPURTENANCES, FITTINGS,VALVES, AND FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES, TEES, &LATERALS CONNECTED TO THE BID ALTERNATIVEWATERLINE WILL BE INSTALLED ONLY IF THE BIDALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED, OR AS SPECIFIEDOTHERWISE PER PLAN.3.IF THE BID ALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED, (BASE BIDONLY) ITEMS SHALL BE DELETED FROM THESCOPE OF WORK.111 11 1 1

PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.######
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 234 1 1234PPCONSTRUCTION NOTES:PCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - P·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL P, SHEET C05. 5678 578 6
8"WBID ALTERNATIVE WATER PIPEAND SIZE (SEE SHEET NOTE 2) 68 WWWW

WWWWWWW
WW

ABNABNABNABNABNABNABNABNABN

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
GAS

OHEOHEOHEOHEGASGAS
8 9
10 11
50 50
50 8"W
8"W8"W8"W22232421
4"W4"W6"W
WS 8+69
WS 9+13
10+77.98 (42.2' L) 90° BEND
10+94.66 (16.6' R) 90° BEND10+78.45 (41.2' R) 90° BEND 10+94.71 (10.2' R)8"x8"x4" TEE(1) 4" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH) 10+72.23 (41.3' R)8"x8"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (NORTH)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (EAST) 10+72.28 (42.2' L)8"x8"x4" TEE(1) 4" GATE VALVE (NORTH)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (WEST)10+72.25 (10.2' R)8" CROSS(4) 8" GATE VALVES 11+15
WS 9+29
10+90.95 (44.5' L)1" ARV PER CITY STDDWG W-8
6"W
8+008+509+009+5010+0010+5011+0011+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► +39.56 (E)GAS XING
+78.53 (E)W XING
(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)6" W
146.84146.99147.14147.30147.45147.60147.75147.90148.05148.24148.45148.68148.90149.12149.34149.56149.78150.00150.22150.45150.67150.89151.11151.33151.52151.67151.76151.81151.81151.81 (E)150.55(E)150.69(E)150.83(E)150.97(E)151.11(E)151.27(E)151.43(E)151.61(E)151.80(E)151.99(E)152.20(E)152.43(E)152.65(E)152.87(E)153.09(E)153.33(E)153.58(E)153.82(E)154.06(E)154.30(E)154.54(E)154.79(E)155.04(E)155.18(E)155.35(E)155.48(E)155.63(E)155.76(E)155.84(E)156.08(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E) +72.25 8" CROSS+94.71 8"x8"x4" TEE
(E)4" W XING(E)2" GAS XING
299.7 LF OF 8" PVC C-900(DR-14)(E)4" W
LINE DATA#L3BEARINGN0° 28' 45"WLENGTH315.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L11L12L13L14L15L16L17L18L19L20 BEARINGN0° 28' 45"WN0° 28' 51"WN90° 00' 00"EN0° 00' 16"WS89° 33' 21"WN0° 27' 56"WN90° 00' 00"WN89° 33' 21"EN0° 34' 13"WN89° 31' 53"E LENGTH272.25'22.47'6.40'5.00'52.39'5.70'5.00'31.05'6.22'5.00' SIZE8"8"4"4"8"4"4"8"6"6"
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C16C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - M ST (BID ALT) STA 8+00 TO 11+15CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C15)MATCHLINE STA. 8+00
5TH ST
5TH ST
008-064-0021321 5TH ST
008-066-0221299 5TH ST008-066-021
008-064-024464 M ST
008-066-008461 M ST008-065-0051290 5TH ST
008-063-012512 M ST
M ST
130140150160
130140150160
008-064-025448 M ST
008-066-013445 M ST
1 PLAN SCALE:10'SCALE IN FEET040'
20'PLAN SCALE:
1 B
1 1
VU

PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
CONSTRUCTION NOTES:BCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - B·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL B, SHEET C04. VCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - V·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL U, SHEET C05. SHEET NOTES:1.ALL SERVICE LINES & APPURTENANCES,FITTINGS, VALVES, AND FIRE HYDRANTASSEMBLIES, TEES, & LATERALSCONNECTED TO THE BID ALTERNATIVEWATERLINE WILL BE INSTALLED ONLY IFTHE BID ALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED, ORAS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE PER PLAN.

WWWWWWWWWWW

ABNABNABNWWW

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSS
SDSD
SDSDSD

SDSDSDSD
SD W
S
GAS

OHEOHEOHEOHE
OHE
OHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHE
OHEOHE
SDD
01 2
3 4
5050
50 01 50
10"W
WS 3+98WS 3+94
27"SD16"SD27"SD12"SD
12"SD
27"SD
27"SD
8"SS
12"SS
30"SD
6"W4"W8"W
10"W
10"W
4"W
12"SS
8"SS1" ARV PER CITY STD1+65.70 (35.5' L)1" ARV PER CITY STDDWG W-82+91.82 (34.9' L)2" BO PER CITY STDDWG W-7 1+001+502+002+503+003+504+00
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS
(E)10" W
(E)27" SD
(E)12" SS
+50.63 (E)SD XING
+80.90 (E)SS XING
146.51146.46146.38146.24146.07145.92145.83145.78145.78145.78143.04143.01142.98145.48145.95145.98146.01146.04146.08146.11146.14146.17146.20146.24 (E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)148.97(E)149.16(E)149.25(E)149.27(E)149.28(E)149.32(E)149.35(E)149.38(E)149.41(E)149.43(E)149.43(E)149.46(E)149.49(E)149.53(E)149.56(E)149.58(E)149.60(E)149.62(E)149.64(E)149.67(E)149.70(E)149.73(E)149.77(E)149.79(E)149.80(E)149.81 +63.64 CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM
(E)8" SS XING(E)12" SD XING
+96.75 (E)W XING
(E)4" W236.4 LF OF 10" PVC C-900(DR-14)ELEV: 142.1ELEV: 144.8 +94.39 22.5° FITTING+01.02 22.5° FITTING
ELEV: 142.0ELEV: 145.0
+66.83 22.5° FITTING+60.08 22.5° FITTING
1"2"
+65.68 1" ARV
+91.80 2" BOV
LINE DATA#L1BEARINGN89° 27' 47"ELENGTH300.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L6BEARINGN89° 28' 33"ELENGTH236.36'SIZE10"DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.
3RD STL ST
L ST(SEE SHEET C11)
C17C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 3RD ST STA 1+00 TO 4+00CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
MATCHLINE STA. 4+00(SEE SHEET C18)
008-111-0231190 & 1160 3RD ST008-111-006306 3RD ST
008-251-007 3RD ST008-251-001290 K ST
008-073-004304 L ST
008-231-001204 L ST
130140150160
130140150160
10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
11 SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. ##### A
1 DCONSTRUCTION NOTES:ACONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 2 - A·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL A, SHEET C04. DCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 2 - D·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL D, SHEET C04. SHEET NOTES:1.SEE SHEET C11 FOR L ST IMPROVEMENTS.1 NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. (E)10" PVC1 1
(E)8" PVC(E)2" GAS
70 WWWWWWWWWW
WWW W

SSSSSSSS
SDSDSD

SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD
SD

SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSSSS
SDSD

ABN SSWW

GASGASGASGASGAS
GAS
GASGAS
GAS

OHEOHEOHE
OHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHE
OHE
D
D
45 6
7 50
50 50
50 10 1150
WS 3+98
WS 5+76WS 5+567+40.82 (18.9' R) 45° BEND
5+10.82 (19.3' L)10"x10"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (NORTH) 5+10.91 (33.4' L)FH PER CITY STDDWG W-11
10"W
10"W
8"W8"W
24"SD
24"SD
12"SD
12"SS
12"SS
4"W
10"W
4"W6"W
5 6 252628 27
7+60
4+72.33 (19.3' L)10"x8" CROSS(2) 8" GATE VALVES (NORTH, SOUTH)(2) 10" GATE VALVES (EAST, WEST)7+02.95 (19.6' L) 45° BEND4+72.42 (44.4' L)8"x8"x4" TEE(1) 4" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH) 4+71.67 (30.4' R) 8"x8"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (SOUTH)4+76.57 (30.4' R) 90° BEND 4+76.87 (44.4' L) 90° BEND4+30.34 (29.9' L)1" ARV PER CITY STDDWG W-8 4+004+505+005+506+006+507+007+507+60
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)12" SS
(E)24" SD
+52.88 (E)SD XING
+99.44 (E)SD XING
+41.54 (E)SS XING
+25.18 (E)SS XING
(E)4" W
146.24146.27146.30146.33144.21143.50143.50143.50143.50143.50143.50143.50144.73146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53146.53 (E)149.81(E)149.85(E)149.88(E)149.99(E)150.13(E)150.17(E)150.23(E)150.29(E)150.35(E)150.14(E)150.05(E)150.12(E)150.16(E)150.20(E)150.24(E)150.27(E)150.32(E)150.37(E)150.43(E)150.48(E)150.54(E)150.59(E)150.66(E)150.74(E)150.82(E)150.91(E)150.97(E)151.01(E)151.04(E)151.06(E)151.09(E)151.41(E)151.85(E)151.75(E)151.43(E) +72.33 10"x8" CROSS
+10.82 10"x10"x6" TEE
+46.64 CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM
(E)6" SS XING(E)4" W XING(E)12" SS XING(E)12" SD XING(E)2" GAS XING (E)24" SD XING+47.17 (E)GAS XING+76.76 (E)W XING
+06.89 (E)W XING
362.8 LF OF 10" PVC C-900(DR-14)ELEV: 142.6ELEV: 145.6
+32.23 22.5° FITTING+42.61 22.5° FITTING
ELEV: 142.6ELEV: 145.4
+16.13 22.5° FITTING+26.37 22.5° FITTING
(E)4" W XING1"+30.31 1" ARV
LINE DATA#L2L4BEARINGN89° 27' 47"EN89° 34' 07"ELENGTH89.17'265.31'CURVE DATA#C1LENGTH5.52'RADIUS3000.00'DELTA0°06'20" CLCLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L7L8L9L11L12L13L14L15L16 BEARINGN89° 28' 33"ES45° 00' 00"EN89° 10' 36"EN0° 20' 42"WN89° 27' 17"EN0° 26' 28"WS0° 13' 53"WN89° 44' 37"ES0° 15' 23"E LENGTH302.98'53.97'5.82'25.17'4.45'6.00'49.64'4.90'6.00' SIZE10"10"10"8"8"8"8"8"8"
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

K ST
C18C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 3RD ST STA 4+00 TO 7+60CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C17)MATCHLINE STA. 4+00K ST008-253-0091081 3RD ST 008-112-006307 K ST008-112-005306 J ST
008-253-001284 J ST
008-111-006306 3RD ST
008-251-001290 K ST
130140150160
130140150160 3RD ST
10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
1212 11CONSTRUCTION NOTES:ESHEET NOTES:1.(E)UTILITY PIPE WAS NOT POTHOLED AT ORADJACENT TO THIS CROSSING LOCATION.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATION PRIOR TOCROSSING AND SHALL MAINTAIN 1' MINIMUMVERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN CROSSING PIPES.

SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #####CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - E·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL E, SHEET C04. 1G
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 123 F
EFCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - F·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL F, SHEET C04. GCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 2 - G·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL G, SHEET C04. 47 65 89 123456789NON-PROFILED UTILITY XING DATA#STATIONOFFSETUTILITYBOTTOM OFUTILITY PIPE ELEVTOP OFWATER PIPE ELEV14+72.3525.5' L(E)SDSEE SHEET NOTE 1143.5024+72.2815.3' L(E)W147.67143.50 1 423
344+72.342.1' R(E)SSSEE SHEET NOTE 1143.504+71.7820.7'R(E)GAS147.32143.50 (E)4"STL
(E)6"ACP

COMMERCIAL SERVICE LINE
71 W

SSSSSSSS
SS

SSSSSSSSSD

SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD
SSW
W

WWWWWWWWW
W
WWSD
SSSSSS
SSSS
SS
S
SS
GASGAS
GAS
GAS
GASGAS

GASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
GASDD
1 2
3 4
50 50
50 50
10"W8"W10"W
16"W
16"W 3031333435 32
2954"SS6"SS12"SD
36"SD66"SD
54"SD
6"SS6"SS
4"SS
14"W
8"W
10"W10"W
WS 2+05
WS 3+31WS 3+53WS 3+44WS 3+59 1+00.17 (20.4' L) 90° BEND 1+29.15 (39.4' L) 90° BEND
1+00.12 (16.5' L)8" TEE(1) 8" GATE VALVE (NORTH)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (WEST) 1+24.96 (16.5' L)16"x16"x10" TEE(1) 10" GATE VALVE (SOUTH)(1) 16"x8" REDUCER (WEST)1+32.99 (16.5' L)16"x16"x10" TEE(1) 10" GATE VALVE (NORTH)(1) 16" BTFLY VALVE (EAST)1+33.26 (38.9' L)10" TEE(1) 10" GATE VALVE (WEST)(1) 10" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH) 1+24.37 (32.2' R)10" TEE(1) 10" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 10" BLIND FLANGE (SOUTH)1+28.37 (32.2' R) 90° BEND 4+26.30 (33.0' L)FH PER CITY STDDWG W-114+26.30 (16.5' L)16"x16"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (NORTH) 1+04.77 (40.1' R)2" BO PER CITY STDDWG W-7
1+18.34 (44.0' L)2" BO PER CITY STDDWG W-73+53.29 (34.1' L)1" ARV PER CITY STDDWG W-8 1+19.20 (35.2' R) 11.25° BEND1+17.62 (32.1' R) 11.25° BEND 0+751+001+502+002+503+003+504+004+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)14" W(E)6" SS(E)54" SD +70.14 (E)SS XING
+29.02 (E)W XING
(E)6" SS
133.65133.69135.86136.21136.21136.21136.21136.21136.42136.87137.31137.75138.18138.57138.90139.19139.43139.62139.76139.85139.88139.89139.89139.89139.89139.89139.89139.89139.89139.89139.89139.85136.90137.11139.78139.74 (E)(E)141.41(E)141.42(E)141.46(E)141.46(E)141.56(E)141.66(E)141.77(E)141.79(E)141.81(E)141.87(E)142.02(E)142.15(E)142.29(E)142.56(E)142.76(E)142.95(E)143.15(E)143.34(E)143.49(E)143.57(E)143.66(E)143.73(E)143.80(E)143.78(E)143.75(E)143.71(E)143.66(E)143.62(E)143.59(E)143.56(E)143.53(E)143.50(E)143.47(E)143.44(E)143.41(E)143.38(E)143.34(E)143.31 +00.12 8"x8"x8" TEE+24.96 16"x16"x10" TEE+32.99 16"x16"x10" TEE +26.30 16"x16"x6" TEE
(E)54" SD(E)6" SS XING
(E)10" W XING
+41.53 (E)SS XING
(E)4" SS XING
+22.71 16"X8" REDUCER
327.3 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14)
+20.52 22.5° FITTING+09.90 22.5° FITTING
ELEV: 135.1ELEV: 132.9
+89.58 (E)GAS XING
(E)1.5" GAS XING(E)1.5" GAS XING
+95.18 CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM
+75.15 HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLING
1"+53.06 1"ARV
+09.89 22.5° FITTING+17.08 22.5° FITTING+29.52 22.5° FITTING+36.46 22.5° FITTING ELEV: 135.5ELEV: 135.5ELEV: 138.4ELEV: 138.5
LINE DATA#L1BEARINGS89° 14' 03"WLENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L13L14L15L16L17L18L19L20L21L22 BEARINGS89° 54' 07"ES0° 00' 00"EN89° 14' 03"EN89° 14' 03"ES0° 04' 37"EN89° 55' 23"ES0° 00' 00"EN0° 04' 37"WN89° 45' 15"WN0° 00' 00"E LENGTH5.00'3.86'24.84'325.04'48.69'4.00'12.83'22.83'4.11'5.00' SIZE8"8"8"16"10"10"10"10"10"10"
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.
4TH ST
C19C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 1+00 TO 4+50CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
MATCHLINE STA. 4+50(SEE SHEET C20)
R ST
R ST021-536-0231700 4TH ST
021-537-0081701 4TH ST021-535-002399 R ST
021-534-001401 R ST021-440-0151618 4TH ST021-440-0141616 4TH ST 021-440-0161619 4TH ST021-440-0171617 4TH ST021-440-0181615 4TH ST CONSTRUCTION NOTES:H
120130140150
120130140150
021-440-0131614 4TH ST 10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
11CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - H·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL H, SHEET C04.

HJ
H11
11 1JCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - J·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL J, SHEET C04. SHEET NOTES:1.(E)UTILITY PIPE WAS NOT POTHOLED AT ORADJACENT TO THIS CROSSING LOCATION.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATION PRIOR TOCROSSING AND SHALL MAINTAIN 1' MINIMUMVERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN CROSSING PIPES.PROPERTYLINE (TYP) (E)EP
SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.######
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 4 312675
8910
12345678910
(E)8" PVC
(E)10" ACP
(E)10" ACPNON-PROFILED UTILITY XING DATA#STATIONOFFSETUTILITYBOTTOM OFUTILITY PIPE ELEVTOP OFWATER PIPE ELEV11+33.0420.5' LDRYN/A135.9321+24.5418.2' R(E)SDSEE SHEET NOTE 1132.10 2 1

29.13 31+28.3236.3' R(E)ELEC137.79132.104
4 1+25.6036.2' R(E)COMM138.89132.10
72 SSSSSSSSSSSSSS

SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD

SSSSSSSSSS

WWWWWWWWWWW
W

SSSSSSSSSSSS

SSSSSSSS SS
GAS

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS

GASGASD
5 6
7 8
50 50
50 50
16"W
16"W
10"W3637
6"SS6"SS
10"SS18"SS
15"SS8"SS
4"SS
48"SD
54"SD
14"W
14"W
10"W
WS 4+55WS 4+72WS 4+89WS 4+93
WS 5+74WS 5+91
WS 6+98WS 7+14
6+54.86 (16.5' L)16"x16"x10" TEE(1) 10" GATE VALVE (NORTH)(2) 16" BTFLY VALVES (EAST, WEST)6+50.78 (31.4' L) 90° BEND6+54.78 (31.4' L) 10" TEE(1) 10" GATE VALVE (WEST)(1) 10" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH)6+57.20 (22.8' L)2" BO PER CITY STDDWG W-7 4+505+005+506+006+507+007+508+00
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)54" SD(E)6" SS(E)14" W(E)8" SS (E)6" SS +72.34 (E)SS XING
(E)143.31(E)143.28(E)143.24(E)143.21(E)143.17(E)143.14(E)143.10(E)143.08(E)143.07(E)143.06(E)143.04(E)143.03(E)143.01(E)143.00(E)142.99(E)142.98(E)142.93(E)142.83(E)142.82(E)142.73(E)142.76(E)142.90(E)142.79(E)142.77(E)142.80(E)142.82(E)142.89(E)142.98(E)143.00(E)143.01(E)143.02(E)143.05(E)143.09(E)143.13(E)143.16(E)143.20 139.74139.69139.64139.59139.54139.50139.45139.40139.35139.30139.26139.21139.16139.11139.06139.02138.97138.92138.87138.82135.50135.50135.50135.50137.76137.77137.79137.80137.82137.84137.85137.87137.88137.90137.91137.93 +54.86 16"x16"x10" TEE
(E)15" SS(E)48" SD(E)18" SS XING+07.87 (E)GAS XING
350.0 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14)
+81.39 22.5° FITTING+86.98 22.5° FITTING
ELEV: 134.1ELEV: 136.3
(E)2" GAS XING
+47.74 22.5° FITTING+40.38 22.5° FITTING
ELEV: 134.1ELEV: 137.4
2"+49.51 2" BOV
LINE DATA#L2BEARINGN89° 14' 03"ELENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L23L24L25L26BEARINGN89° 14' 03"EN1° 04' 26"WS89° 14' 03"WN0° 45' 57"WLENGTH350.00'14.92'4.00'5.00'SIZE16"10"10"10"DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C20C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 4+50 TO 8+00CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C19)MATCHLINE STA. 4+50
MATCHLINE STA. 8+00(SEE SHEET C21) Q ST021-440-0121612 4TH ST021-440-0111610 4TH ST 021-440-0191613 4TH ST021-440-0201611 4TH ST021-440-0211609 4TH ST021-440-0221607 4TH ST021-440-0231605 4TH ST 021-440-066401 Q ST
4TH ST
120130140150
120130140150
021-440-0241603 4TH ST 021-440-0181615 4TH ST
021-440-0131614 4TH ST10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
1111 11
3 11
K

PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EPCONSTRUCTION NOTES:KCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - K·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL K, SHEET C04.

SDSDSDSD

SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD

SSSSSSSS

SSSSSSSS
SSSS
WWW
W
WWWWWW
W WSS

SSSSSSSS

SSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SSSS
SSS
GASGAS

GASGASGAS

GASGASGASGASGASGASGAS

GASGAS DD
8 9
10 11
50 50
50 50
16"W
16"W
8"W8"W8"W8"W404142 39 3838a
6"SS15"SS
6"SS
48"SD
12"SD8"SD12"SD
8"SS15"SS48"SD
12"SD12"SD6"SS
14"W
8"W8"W14"W
WS 8+18WS 8+32
WS 10+21WS 10+35
WS 11+02WS 11+19WS 11+40
8+76.00 (16.5' L)16"x16"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (NORTH) 9+41.78 (26.5' R)8" TEE(1) 8" GATE VALVE (WEST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (SOUTH) 8+75.86 (32.0' L)FH PER CITY STDDWG W-119+15.96 (52.7' L) 90° BEND 9+15.59 (26.3' R) 90° BEND
9+41.51 (16.5' L)16"x8" CROSS(2) 8" GATE VALVES (NORTH SOUTH)(2) 16" BTFLY VALVES (EAST, WEST)9+41.27 (52.5' L)8" TEE(1) 8" GATE VALVE (WEST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH)8+52.41 (35.1' L)1" ARV PER CITY STDDWG W-8 6"SS
8+008+509+009+5010+0010+5011+0011+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)14" W(E)2" GAS(E)48" SD(E)15" SS(E)6" SS +15.87 (E)W XING+03.41 (E)SD XING
137.93137.95137.96137.98137.99138.01136.23136.15136.15136.15136.15136.15136.15136.15136.15136.15136.15138.43138.45138.48138.51138.53138.56138.59138.61138.64138.66138.69138.72138.74138.77138.79138.82138.85138.87138.90 (E)143.20(E)143.22(E)143.24(E)143.27(E)143.30(E)143.33(E)143.37(E)143.39(E)143.39(E)143.31(E)143.29(E)143.31(E)143.46(E)143.57(E)143.57(E)143.47(E)143.46(E)143.60(E)143.62(E)143.65(E)143.69(E)143.73(E)143.77(E)143.81(E)143.86(E)143.93(E)143.99(E)144.01(E)144.04(E)144.07(E)144.09(E)144.11(E)144.15(E)144.20(E)144.25(E)144.31 +76.00 16"x16"x6" TEE
+41.51 16"x8" CROSS
(E)8" W XING(E)15" SS(E)8" SS(E)12" SD XING(E)2" GAS XING 350.0 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14)
+55.66 22.5° FITTING+60.30 22.5° FITTING
ELEV: 136.5ELEV: 134.7
+61.49 (E)GAS XING+60.95 22.5° FITTING+66.39 22.5° FITTING ELEV: 134.7ELEV: 137.0
1"+52.13 1"ARV
+22.51 (E)SS XING
(E)6" SS XING
LINE DATA#L3BEARINGN89° 14' 03"ELENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L27L28L29L30L31L32L33 BEARINGN89° 14' 03"EN1° 08' 02"WS89° 32' 58"WN0° 23' 31"WS1° 08' 02"ES89° 33' 05"WS0° 23' 31"E LENGTH350.00'36.04'25.32'5.00'42.98'26.19'5.00'
SIZE16"8"8"8"8"8"8"
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C21C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 8+00 TO 11+50CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C20MATCHLINE STA. 8+00
MATCHLINE STA. 11+50(SEE SHEET C22)
021-440-0271517 4TH ST021-440-0281515 4TH ST
021-440-0541514 4TH ST021-440-0531512 4TH ST
4TH ST
120130140150
120130140150
P ST
P ST021-440-0251601 4TH ST
021-440-065400 P ST021-440-055401 P ST
021-440-0261519 4TH ST021-440-0241603 4TH ST
10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
11 11111
11 L

LPROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EPCONSTRUCTION NOTES:LCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - L·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL L, SHEET C04. SHEET NOTES:1.(E)UTILITY PIPE WAS NOT POTHOLED AT ORADJACENT TO THIS CROSSING LOCATION.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATION PRIOR TOCROSSING AND SHALL MAINTAIN 1' MINIMUMVERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN CROSSING PIPES.

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

WWWWWWWW
W
WW
WW
WW

SDSDSDSSSSSS

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS SSS

GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS
GASGAS

GASGASGASGAS
D12
13 14
50 50
50 50
01 50
16"W
16"W
6"W4443
15"SS
15"SS
48"SD
12"SD48"SD
6"SS
15"SS
12"SD
14"W
6"W
WS 11+57
WS 12+60WS 12+74
WS 13+64WS 13+91WS 13+95WS 13+81
12+02.21 (16.5' L)16"x16"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (NORTH)(2) 16" BTFLY VALVES (EAST, WEST)12+67.40 (32.0' L)FH PER CITY STDDWG W-1112+67.39 (16.5' L)16"x16"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (NORTH) 11+5012+0012+5013+0013+5014+0014+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)14" W(E)15" SS(E)48" SD +20.32 (E)SS XING+93.98 (E)SD XING
138.90138.93136.84136.84136.84136.84136.84136.84136.84136.84136.84136.84136.84136.85139.27139.29139.31139.33139.35139.37139.39139.41139.43139.46139.48139.50139.52139.54139.56139.58139.59 (E)144.31(E)144.29(E)144.20(E)144.22(E)144.23(E)144.24(E)144.31(E)144.35(E)144.36(E)144.40(E)144.54(E)144.58(E)144.62(E)144.66(E)144.70(E)144.75(E)144.79(E)144.83(E)144.86(E)144.89(E)144.92(E)144.95(E)144.97(E)144.99(E)145.03(E)145.07(E)145.11(E)145.15(E)145.16(E)145.14(E)145.15 +02.21 16"x16"x6" TEE
+67.39 16"x16"x6" TEE
(E)6" SS XING(E)12" SD XING+70.15 (E)GAS XING
(E)2" GAS XING
297.6 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14)ELEV: 137.8ELEV: 135.4+79.96 22.5° FITTING+86.42 22.5° FITTING +61.49 22.5° FITTING+68.83 22.5° FITTING
ELEV: 135.4ELEV: 137.5
+81.23 (E)GAS XING
LINE DATA#L4BEARINGN89° 14' 03"ELENGTH266.85'CURVE DATA#C6LENGTH33.15'RADIUS225.00'DELTA8°26'29" CLCLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L34BEARINGN89° 14' 03"ELENGTH266.85'SIZEPOTABLE WATERPIPE CURVE DATA#C11LENGTH30.73'RADIUS208.50'DELTA8°26'40"SIZE16"16" DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C22C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 11+50 TO 14+50CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C21)MATCHLINE STA. 11+50
MATCHLINE STA. 14+50(SEE SHEET C23)
4TH ST
120130140150
120130140150
STEPHANIE CT(SEE SHEET C29)
021-440-0291513 4TH ST021-440-0301511 4TH ST021-440-0311509 4TH ST021-440-0321507 4TH ST021-440-0331505 4TH ST 021-440-0441508 4TH ST021-440-0431506 4TH ST021-440-0421504 4TH ST021-440-0531512 4TH ST10'SCALE IN FEET020'40' PLAN SCALE:
11 11SHEET NOTES:1.SEE SHEET C29 FOR STEPHANIE CT IMPROVEMENTS. 11 1 1
11 1PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.######
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 11 111
43a
PROVIDE HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLINGS ASNEEDED TO APPROXIMATE THE RADIUS** 75 WW

SDSDSDSDSD

SDSDSDSDSD
WW
W
W
WWWWWW
WWWW
SSSS
SSSS

SSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDS
S
S
GAS
GAS
GAS

GASGASGASGAS
GAS

GASGASGASGASGAS

GASGASGAS

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE D
15 16
17 18
50 50
50 50
16"W
10"W10"W
16"W8"W010304
02 34
15"SS
15"SS
15"SS6"SS
36"SD
15"SD
18"SD36"SD
48"SD
18"SS14"W8"W
6"W6"W
14"W
WS 15+03WS 15+22WS 14+90WS 15+06
WS 16+62
WS 17+17
WS 17+71WS 17+69
16+51.72 (9.0' L)16"x10" CROSS(2) 10" GATE VALVES (NORTH, SOUTH)(2) 16" BTFLY VALVES (EAST, WEST) 16+51.70 (51.8' L)10"x8" CROSS(1) 8" GATE VALVE (WEST)(1) 8"x6" REDUCER (EAST)(1) 6" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 10" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH) 16+51.75 (62.7' R)10"x10"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 10" BLIND FLANGE (SOUTH) 16+51.67 (44.8' L)10"x10"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (EAST)16+18.04 (52.0' L) 90° BEND 16+65.30 (62.7' R) 90° BEND
16+60.71 (51.8' L)90° BEND(1) 6" GATE VALVE (WEST)16+63.15 (44.8' L)FH PER CITY STDDWG W-11 14+5015+0015+5016+0016+5017+0017+5018+00
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)14" W(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)15" SS(E)36" SD +75.21 (E)SD XING+65.94 (E)W XING
+00.87 (E)SD XING+92.98 (E)SS XING
139.59139.61139.63139.65139.67139.69139.72139.74139.77139.80139.82139.85139.88139.91139.94139.97139.99140.02140.05140.08140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11140.11 (E)145.15(E)145.16(E)145.21(E)145.28(E)145.31(E)145.33(E)145.38(E)145.40(E)145.40(E)145.41(E)145.50(E)145.59(E)145.79(E)145.97(E)146.29(E)146.47(E)146.65(E)146.88(E)147.11(E)146.80(E)146.81(E)146.84(E)146.83(E)146.83(E)146.83(E)146.86(E)146.88(E)146.91(E)146.96(E)147.00(E)147.03(E)147.02(E)147.01(E)147.02(E)147.03(E)147.05 +51.72 16"x10" CROSS
(E)48" SD(E)6" SS XING(E)18" SD XING(E)36" SD(E)6" W XING(E)15" SD XING351.3 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14) LINE DATA#L6L7BEARINGN70° 21' 32"EN89° 29' 05"ELENGTH59.41'172.84'CURVE DATA#C7C9LENGTH40.97'76.78'RADIUS225.00'230.00'DELTA10°26'02"19°07'32" CLCLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L36L37L38L39L40L41L42L43L44L45L46 BEARINGN70° 10' 29"EN89° 35' 04"EN89° 29' 05"EN0° 32' 31"WS89° 29' 39"WN0° 19' 35"EN89° 29' 00"EN0° 23' 19"WS0° 32' 31"EN89° 29' 05"ES0° 21' 35"E LENGTH35.54'52.45'148.33'42.82'35.75'5.95'9.01'6.00'71.72'13.55'6.00' SIZE16"16"16"10"8"8"6"6"10"6"6"POTABLE WATERPIPE CURVE DATA#C12C14LENGTH37.96'77.06'RADIUS208.50'226.96'DELTA10°25'51"19°27'19"SIZE16"16" DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

O ST
C23C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 14+50 TO 18+00CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C22)MATCHLINE STA. 14+50O ST4TH ST
120130140150
120130140150
MATCHLINE STA. 18+00(SEE SHEET C24) 021-440-0411502 4TH ST021-440-0401500 4TH ST 021-440-0341503 4TH ST021-440-0351501 4TH ST008-071-011385 O ST008-071-0151461 4TH ST 008-062-012415 & 418 O ST008-062-0131460 4TH ST 10'SCALE IN FEET020'40' PLAN SCALE:
12 12 1212
11 1121
1 2
N

MPROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EPCONSTRUCTION NOTES:MCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - M·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL M, SHEET C04. NCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - N·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL N, SHEET C05. SHEET NOTES:1.(E)UTILITY PIPE WAS NOT POTHOLED AT ORADJACENT TO THIS CROSSING LOCATION.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATION PRIOR TOCROSSING AND SHALL MAINTAIN 1' MINIMUMVERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN CROSSING PIPES.

SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.######
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 12 123
1011
6879
54 123456789101112
(E)6" ACP(E)8" ACP
(E)6" ACPNON-PROFILED UTILITY XING DATA#STATIONOFFSETUTILITYBOTTOM OFUTILITY PIPE ELEVTOP OFWATER PIPE ELEV116+51.7135.5' L(E)GAS142.13141.13216+51.7117.5' L(E)W140.96139.85316+51.7323.3' R(E)SDSEE SHEET NOTE 1139.85416+51.6747.2' R(E)GAS143.32139.85 12 34
PROVIDE HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLINGS ASNEEDED TO APPROXIMATE THE RADIUS*** 76 WW W

SDSDSDSD

SDSD D WWWWWWWWWWW
SD

SSSSSSSS

GASGASGAS
GAS

GASGASGASGASGASGAS GAS

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE D
18 19
20 21
50 50
50 50
16"W
16"W
8"W8"W05064546
6"SS
18"SD18"SD30"SD
36"SD
14"W
14"W
6"W6"W
WS 18+59WS 18+83
WS 20+93
20+14.53 (41.1' L)FH PER CITY STDDWG W-1120+00.40 (41.1' L)8"x8"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (EAST)20+00.41 (47.1' L)8"x8"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH) 20+00.31 (50.1' R)8"x8"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (SOUTH)20+03.32 (50.1' R) 90° BEND 20+03.47 (47.1' L) 90° BEND20+00.37 (9.0' L)16"x8" CROSS(2) 8" GATE VALVES (NORTH, SOUTH)(2) 16" BTFLY VALVES (EAST, WEST) WS 21+01
07 18+0018+5019+0019+5020+0020+5021+0021+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ►(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)14" W +13.99 (E)SD XING+03.26 (E)W XING
+68.78 (E)GAS XING
+08.38 (E)SS XING
(E)2" GAS(E)2" GAS
140.11140.11140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.12140.11140.19140.26140.34140.41140.49140.56140.64140.71140.79140.86140.93 (E)147.05(E)147.07(E)147.09(E)147.09(E)147.12(E)147.16(E)147.19(E)147.22(E)147.25(E)147.28(E)147.32(E)147.36(E)147.37(E)147.38(E)147.42(E)147.30(E)147.37(E)147.49(E)147.65(E)147.75(E)147.66(E)147.64(E)147.62(E)147.59(E)147.64(E)147.70(E)147.74(E)147.76(E)147.78(E)147.81(E)147.83(E)147.84(E)147.85(E)147.86(E)147.89(E)147.92 +00.37 16"x8" CROSS
(E)6" SS XING(E)18" SD XING(E)6" W XING(E)2" GAS XING
350.0 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14)
(E)36" SD(E)18" SD
LINE DATA#L8BEARINGN89° 29' 05"ELENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L47L49L50L51L52L53L54 BEARINGN89° 29' 05"EN0° 27' 42"WN89° 27' 18"EN0° 24' 59"WS0° 27' 42"EN89° 28' 53"ES0° 26' 14"E LENGTH350.00'38.15'3.06'6.00'59.09'3.00'6.00'
SIZE16"8"6"6"8"6"6"
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

N ST
C24C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 18+00 TO 21+50CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
N ST
008-062-0081440 4TH ST
008-071-0091441 4TH ST008-071-010384 N ST008-072-009379 N ST008-072-0041365 4TH ST 008-062-006412 N ST008-064-014413 N ST008-064-013
4TH ST
120130140150
120130140150
(SEE SHEET C23)MATCHLINE STA. 18+00
MATCHLINE STA. 21+50(SEE SHEET C25)
10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
11 1
1 1
O

O PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EPCONSTRUCTION NOTES:OCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - O·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL O, SHEET C05. SHEET NOTES:1.(E)UTILITY PIPE WAS NOT POTHOLED AT ORADJACENT TO THIS CROSSING LOCATION.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATION PRIOR TOCROSSING AND SHALL MAINTAIN 1' MINIMUMVERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN CROSSING PIPES.

WWWWWWW
WWWW
WWWW

SSSSSSSS
S

ABNWABN

GASGASGASGASGAS

GASGASGASGAS

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHE
22 23
24 25
50 50
50 50
650
16"W
16"W
8"W8"W0809
10114748
12"SS12"SS
14"W
6"W
WS 23+09
WS 24+48WS 24+54
23+59.35 (9.0' L)SEE SHEET C1523+84.21 (9.0' L)16"x16"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (NORTH) 23+84.21 (29.0' L)FH PER CITY STDDWG W-1123+59.36 (43.1' L)SEE SHEET C15 23+59.31 (31.3' R)SEE SHEET C1523+75.58 (31.3' R)SEE SHEET C15 23+77.83 (43.2' L)SEE SHEET C158"W 8"W
14"W
6"W
21+5022+0022+5023+0023+5024+0024+5025+00
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)2" GAS(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)14" W(E)12" SS XING +75.93 (E)W XING
+32.92 (E)GAS XING
+71.64 (E)SS XING140.93141.01141.08141.16141.23141.31141.38141.46141.53141.60141.68141.75141.83141.90141.98142.05142.13142.20142.28142.35142.42142.48142.48142.49142.52142.64142.77142.90143.03143.16143.29143.42143.55143.67143.80143.93 (E)147.92(E)147.94(E)147.95(E)147.97(E)148.01(E)148.04(E)148.06(E)148.09(E)148.12(E)148.15(E)148.18(E)148.22(E)148.26(E)148.30(E)148.36(E)148.41(E)148.46(E)148.49(E)148.53(E)148.58(E)148.64(E)148.66(E)148.69(E)148.77(E)148.86(E)148.94(E)149.01(E)149.08(E)149.16(E)149.24(E)149.32(E)149.39(E)149.48(E)149.60(E)149.72(E)149.83 +59.35 16"x8" CROSS+84.21 16"x16"x6" TEE
(E)2" GAS XING(E)6" W XING
350.0 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14)
LINE DATA#L9BEARINGN89° 29' 05"ELENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L55BEARINGN89° 29' 05"ELENGTH350.00'SIZE16"DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C25C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 21+50 TO 25+00CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C24)MATCHLINE STA. 21+50
MATCHLINE STA. 25+00(SEE SHEET C26)
M ST(SEE SHEET C15)
M ST(SEE SHEET C15)
008-072-0121325 4TH ST
008-064-0111320 4TH ST008-066-0201276 4TH ST
008-073-0141291 4TH ST4TH ST
130140150160
130140150160
008-073-0151261 4TH ST
10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
113 1 PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.######
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 1 1
P
PCONSTRUCTION NOTES:PCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM - P·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL P, SHEET C05. SHEET NOTES:1.SEE SHEET C15 FOR M ST IMPROVEMENTS.2.ALL SERVICE LINES & APPURTENANCES, FITTINGS,VALVES, AND FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLIES, TEES, &LATERALS CONNECTED TO THE BID ALTERNATIVEWATERLINE WILL BE INSTALLED ONLY IF THE BIDALTERNATIVE IS SELECTED, OR AS SPECIFIEDOTHERWISE PER PLAN. 8"WBID ALTERNATIVE WATER PIPEAND SIZE (SEE SHEET NOTE 2) (E)6" ACP
(E)6" ACP
78 WWW

SSSSWWWWWW
W
WWW

SDWW WW
SSSS
S

WGASGAS
ABN

GASGASGAS
GAS
GAS
GAS
OHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHESDSDSDD
25 26
27 28
50 50
50 50
650
16"W
16"W
8"W8"W1213141513A
12 11
13 8"SS8"SS
12"SD
8"W
12"W4"W
10"WWS 28+4027+55.97 (30.8' L)FH PER CITY STDDWG W-11
27+55.97 (9.0' L)16"x16"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (NORTH)26+87.40 (9.0' L)SEE SHEET C12 14"W
4"W6"W4"W
25+0025+5026+0026+5027+0027+5028+0028+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E) GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)14" W(E)8" W(E)10" W (E)8" SS XING(E)16" SD XING+33.89 (E)SD XING+26.00 (E)GAS XING+23.04 (E)W XING +28.97 (E)SS XING143.93144.06144.19144.31144.31144.31144.37144.49144.62144.75144.88145.01145.14145.26145.39145.52145.65145.78145.91146.04146.20146.37146.53146.69146.85147.02147.18147.34147.61147.98148.35148.72149.09149.46149.83150.20 (E)149.83(E)149.94(E)150.05(E)150.16(E)150.31(E)150.46(E)150.61(E)150.75(E)150.90(E)151.05(E)151.20(E)151.36(E)151.52(E)151.68(E)151.85(E)151.98(E)152.07(E)152.17(E)152.46(E)152.64(E)152.85(E)153.17(E)153.15(E)153.29(E)153.28(E)153.33(E)153.43(E)153.67(E)153.76(E)153.88(E)153.99(E)154.11(E)154.21(E)154.31(E)154.40(E)154.48 +87.40 16"x16"x8" TEE
+55.97 16"x16"x6" TEE
(E)2" GAS XING(E)4" W XING
350.0 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14)
+74.93 HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLING
+10.62 HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLING
+55.30 HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLING
ELEV: 146.0ELEV: 144.9ELEV: 142.9
LINE DATA#L10BEARINGN89° 29' 05"ELENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L56BEARINGN89° 29' 05"ELENGTH350.00'SIZE16"DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C26C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 25+00 TO 28+50CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C25)MATCHLINE STA. 25+00
MATCHLINE STA. 28+50(SEE SHEET C27)
L ST(SEE SHEET C12)
L ST(SEE SHEET C12) 008-066-017408 L ST
008-073-008390 L ST
008-102-005407 L ST
008-111-0211174 & 1176 4TH ST
4TH ST
130140150160
130140150160
008-066-0201276 4TH ST
008-073-0151261 4TH ST
10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
1 1SHEET NOTES:1.SEE SHEET C12 FOR L ST IMPROVEMENTS.1

PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.######
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 11 (E)4" ACP(E)12" ACP
(E)4" CIP(E)6" ACP
79 WWWWWW
WWWWW
WWW W

SSSSWWWWWWWWWWW
SSSS
S

GASGASGASGAS

GASGASGASGAS
GASABN

ABNABNABNABNABNABN
ABN
GAS

GASOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHEOHE
29 30
31 32
50 50
50 50
50 16"W
16"W
8"W 1617181920
8"SS8"SS
4"W 4"W
WS 29+52WS 29+81
30+80.58 (9.0' L)16"x8" CROSS(2) 8" GATE VALVES (NORTH, SOUTH)(2) 16" BTFLY VALVES (EAST, WEST)31+10.19 (9.0' L)16"x16"x6" TEE(1) 6" GATE VALVE (NORTH) 31+10.19 (29.9' L)FH PER CITY STDDWG W-11
30+85.89 (50.1' R)90° BEND
30+85.85 (32.7' L)90° BEND30+80.53 (32.7' L)8"x8"x4" TEE(1) 4" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (NORTH) 30+80.72 (50.1' R)8"x8"x4" TEE(1) 4" GATE VALVE (EAST)(1) 8" BLIND FLANGE (SOUTH) WS 31+04
8"W10"W
28+5029+0029+5030+0030+5031+0031+5032+00
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ►(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)10" W(E)2" GAS(E)8" W (E)8" SS
+85.86 (E)W XING
+55.26 (E)GAS XING
150.20150.57150.94151.31151.68151.78151.78151.81151.84151.88151.91151.95151.98152.02152.05152.09152.12152.16152.19152.23152.26152.29152.33152.36152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38 (E)154.48(E)154.56(E)154.65(E)154.74(E)154.83(E)154.92(E)155.01(E)155.11(E)155.22(E)155.35(E)155.48(E)155.61(E)155.74(E)155.88(E)156.03(E)156.19(E)156.34(E)156.51(E)156.69(E)156.85(E)157.02(E)157.10(E)157.31(E)157.00(E)156.70(E)156.48(E)156.76(E)157.06(E)157.22(E)157.32(E)157.42(E)157.52(E)157.60(E)157.68(E)157.77(E)157.88 +80.58 16"x8" CROSS
+10.19 16"x16"x6" TEE
(E)2" GAS XING(E)4" W XING
350.0 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14)
+92.73 HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLING
ELEV: 150.3
LINE DATA#L11BEARINGN89° 29' 05"ELENGTH350.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L57L59L60L61L62L63L64 BEARINGN89° 29' 05"ES0° 39' 06"EN89° 27' 10"ES0° 26' 14"EN0° 39' 06"WN89° 27' 17"EN0° 26' 28"W LENGTH350.00'59.08'5.17'6.00'23.68'5.32'6.00'
SIZE16"8"4"4"8"6"6"
DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C27C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 28+50 TO 32+00CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.AS NOTEDNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C26)MATCHLINE STA. 28+50K ST
K ST008-102-0131120 4TH ST
008-111-0111121 4TH ST008-112-012391 K ST
008-103-0061080 4TH ST
4TH ST
130140150160
130140150160
MATCHLINE STA. 32+00(SEE SHEET C28) 008-102-0161140 4TH ST008-102-005407 L ST 008-111-0211174 & 1176 4TH ST
10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
1 111

PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.######
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 11 R
RCONSTRUCTION NOTES:RCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 1 - R·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL R, SHEET C05. 43 76
2345672
5 1
NON-PROFILED UTILITY XING DATA#STATIONOFFSETUTILITYBOTTOM OFUTILITY PIPE ELEVTOP OFWATER PIPE ELEV130+80.5523.1' L(E)W152.90152.03230+80.5716.4' L(E)W152.26152.03 12 (E)4" STL
(E)4" CIP
80 WWWWWW
ABN
ABNABN

SS WWWWW

ABNABNABN
SSSSSS

ABNABNABNABN
S
WWWW
WWWWW

GASGASGASGASGASGAS
OHE

OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE

OHEOHEOHE
OHE
32 33
34 50
50 50
16"W216"SS 6"SS
8"W10"W
8"W10"W
6"W6"W16"W
35+00
32+0032+5033+0033+5034+0034+5035+0035+50
PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ►(E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)10" W(E)16" W(E)8" W +50.07 (E)SS XING
152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.38152.48152.67152.86153.06153.21153.21153.21153.21 (E)157.88(E)158.03(E)158.18(E)158.33(E)158.44(E)158.54(E)158.65(E)158.71(E)158.74(E)158.75(E)158.76(E)158.76(E)158.76(E)158.74(E)158.72(E)158.70(E)158.52(E)158.34(E)158.16(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E) +83.70 CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM
(E)6" SS XING183.7 LF OF 16" PVC C-900(DR-14)
+48.01 HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLING
+05.04 HIGH DEFLECTION COUPLING
ELEV: 150.9ELEV: 151.8
LINE DATA#L12BEARINGN89° 29' 05"ELENGTH300.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L58BEARINGN89° 29' 05"ELENGTH183.70'SIZE16"DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

C28C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - 4TH ST STA 32+00 TO 35+00CIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA N.T.S.AS NOTEDNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL
(SEE SHEET C27)MATCHLINE STA. 32+00J ST
J ST
008-112-001384 J ST
008-103-005410 J ST
008-113-011391 J ST
008-105-006980 4TH ST
4TH ST
008-112-012391 K ST
008-103-0061080 4TH ST10'SCALE IN FEET020'40'
PLAN SCALE:
1 1S

PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EPCONSTRUCTION NOTES:SCONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM TYPE 2 - S·CONNECT TO (E)W SYSTEM PERCONNECTION DETAIL S, SHEET C05.

SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.######
WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT FROM H,I,J LINCOLN WATERDISTRIBUTION REHAB PROJECT.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE.130140150160 130140150160
1 1
81 +51.12 (E)SD XING
+50.00 (E)W XING+31.76 (E)W XING1+001+502+002+503+003+504+00 PROPOSED GRADES @ TOP OF W PIPE ►EXISTING GRADE ABOVE W PIPE ► (E)GROUND ABOVE WATERLINE(E)2" GAS(E)6" W(E)6" SS(E)12" SD136.41136.44136.47136.50137.16140.06140.13140.17140.20140.23140.26140.29140.32140.36140.39140.42140.45140.48140.51140.55140.58140.61140.64140.68 (E)144.70(E)144.42(E)144.18(E)143.97(E)143.76(E)143.65(E)143.69(E)143.73(E)143.77(E)143.82(E)143.88(E)143.94(E)144.12(E)144.19(E)144.25(E)144.35(E)144.41(E)144.45(E)144.50(E)144.54(E)144.57(E)144.60(E)144.60(E)144.51(E)144.60(E)144.69(E)(E)(E)(E)(E) +16.43 16"x16"x6" TEE+20.43 (E)W XING
(E)12" SD XING(E)14" W XING(E)6" W XING(E)6" W XING
236.4 LF OF 6" PVC C-900(DR-14)ELEV: 135.9ELEV: 139.4+57.80 22.5° FITTING+70.52 22.5° FITTING 2"+50.00 1"ARV & 2"BOV
1" SS

SDSDSDSDSD SSSSSSSSSS

WWWWW WWWWWW

WW SDSDSD

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
SS

SSSSSSSSSS
SS
S
S

GASGASGASGASGAS GASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGAS D
2"
1250501
2 3
50 50
50 1+16.43 (12.9' L)SEE SHEET C293+43.04 (14.1' L) 45° BEND3+50.00 (7.2' L) 45° BENDWS 3+50WS 3+25WS 3+03WS 3+02WS 2+94 WS 2+35WS 2+25
WS 3+78WS 3+75
6"W
16"W16"W
6"W
14"W
6"W
12"SD
12"SD
48"SD12"SD15"SS15"SS
6"SS
6"SD48"SD
4+003+74.67 (39.8' R)1" ARV & 2" BOVPER CITY STD DWG W-8 & W-7 LINE DATA#L1BEARINGN0° 27' 51"WLENGTH300.00'CLPOTABLE WATERPIPE LINE DATA#L3L4L5BEARINGN0° 45' 57"WN44° 14' 03"EN89° 32' 09"ELENGTH226.61'9.79'27.33'SIZE6"6"6"DRAWING SCALEHOR. SCALE:VERT. SCALE:

R.E.Y. PROJECT NO.SHEET NO.OFREVIEWER:DATE:DRAFTER:DESIGNER:DRAWING INFOCHECKED BYDATE DRAWING SCALEREVISION DESCRIPTIONNO.

STEPHANIE CT4TH ST(SEE SHEET C22)
4TH ST(SEE SHEET C21)
C29C295175.3010CBABSM/NA12-16-2025CITY OF LINCOLNPLAN & PROFILE - STEPHANIE CTCIP #654Lincoln Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR:CALIFORNIA 1" = 4'1' = 20'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION90% SUBMITTAL021-440-0531512 4TH ST021-440-052420 STEPHANIE CT 021-440-0441508 4TH ST021-440-045411 STEPHANIE CT
021-440-046431 STEPHANIE CT021-440-047441 STEPHANIE CT021-440-048461 STEPHANIE CT 021-440-049450 STEPHANIE CT
021-440-050440 STEPHANIE CT021-440-051430 STEPHANIE CT021-440-0291513 4TH ST 021-440-0301511 4TH ST
021-440-0311509 4TH ST
021-440-0281515 4TH ST
130140150160
130140150160
PLAN SCALE:10'SCALE IN FEET040'
20'PLAN SCALE:
11SHEET NOTES:1.SEE SHEET C22 FOR 4TH ST IMPROVEMENTS2.(E)UTILITY PIPE WAS NOT POTHOLED AT ORADJACENT TO THIS CROSSING LOCATION.CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATION PRIOR TOCROSSING AND SHALL MAINTAIN 1' MINIMUMVERTICAL CLEARANCE BETWEEN CROSSING PIPES.

SHEET LEGEND:SEE SHEET C01 FOR FULL LEGEND.WATER SERVICE TYPE. SEE SHEET C03FOR WATER SERVICE TYPE DETAILS.POTHOLE LOCATION. SEE THE POTHOLEREPORT INCLUDED IN THE PROJECTSPECIFICATIONS.CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT LINE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET.WATERLINE ALIGNMENT CURVE SEGMENT.SEE TABLE ON THIS SHEET. #####
3 11
11 1 11PROPERTYLINE (TYP)
(E)EP
NOTE:MAINLINE CROSSING LABELS BASED ON AVAILABLEINFORMATION. SERVICE CROSSINGS NOT LABELEDFOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEAPPROPRIATE PRECAUTIONS TO PROTECT(E)UTILITIES IN PLACE. 123123
NON-PROFILED UTILITY XING DATA#STATIONOFFSETUTILITYBOTTOM OFUTILITY PIPE ELEVTOP OFWATER PIPE ELEV13+50.003.4' L(E)SSSEE SHEET NOTE 2140.6823+50.008.9' R(E)SSSEE SHEET NOTE 2140.68 21 82
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION 2026 - XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING

THE PLANS AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO

PROCEED WITH THE BIDDING PROCESS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER REHABILITATION FY 23/24 – CIP 654

WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget includes CIP 654 – Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24; and

WHEREAS, on May 14, 2024 City Council adopted a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Task Order with REY Engineers, Inc. for design services; and

WHEREAS, REY Engineers has prepared the plans and technical specifications for the project.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Lincoln authorizes the City approving the plans and technical specifications and staff to proceed with the bidding process for the construction of Water Rehabilitation FY 23/24 CIP 654.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13TH day of January, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

83 SUBJECT:

Adopt A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Task Order for Professional Services With R.E.Y Engineers, Inc. In The Amount Of $336,163 For the Design of K St, O St, P St & 5th St Water Rehabilitation Capital Improvement Project (CIP 713).(Jonnelyn Espartero)
SUBMITTED BY:

Jonnelyn Espartero
DEPARTMENT:

Engineering
DATE:

January 13, 2026

Item Number 11.F

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a task order for professional services with R.E.Y Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $336,163 for the design of K St, O St, P St & 5
th
St Water Rehabilitation Capital Improvement
Project, CIP 713.

The project is funded by Fund 7110 Water Capital as part of the ongoing water rehabilitation throughout the City.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

As part of the City’s long-term efforts to maintain and improve the water distribution system, the K St, O St, P St & 5th St Water Rehabilitation Capital Improvement Project (CIP 713) has been identified as the next priority project. This project involves the replacement of aging and deteriorated water infrastructure, including approximately 4,850 linear feet of water mains, service lines, valves, fire hydrants, and other associated appurtenances.

The originally identified project limits included:

M St from 5th St to 7th St
L St from 5th St to 7th St
5th St from J St to N St
6th St from J St to O St
Per discussions with Public Works staff, certain adjustments to the project limits were necessary to more effectively address current infrastructure conditions and operational requirements. Additionally, the scope has been revised to provide continuity with the previous

STAFF REPORT
84 Water Rehabilitation projects. Aligning the new work with previous improvements ensures a more coherent and connected approach, maximizing the effectiveness of the rehabilitation effort.

The revised project limits are:

K St from 1st St to 5th St
O St from 3rd St to 5th St
P St from the northeast corner of the undeveloped parcel to 4th St 5th St from J St to O St
These adjustments support the City’s strategic goal of delivering a comprehensive and sustainable water system upgrade, while maintaining operational efficiency and continuity with prior rehabilitation efforts.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

R.E.Y. Engineers, Inc. has established a strong working relationship with the City through the successful delivery of multiple infrastructure improvement projects. Their previous work includes the H, I, J Water Rehabilitation Project (CIP 485) and the FY 2023/24 Water Distribution Rehabilitation Project (CIP 654), where the proposed water improvements will directly connect to.

Additionally, they have demonstrated the ability to prepare construction plans that meet City standards and specifications, resulting in minimal change orders during construction. Based on their performance, experience, and familiarity with the City’s water system, staff find R.E.Y. to be well-qualified to provide professional design services for this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as codified at Public Resources Code
§§ 21000,
et seq
., and as further governed by 14
California Code of
Regulations
§§ 15000,
et seq
., because it is not a project as contemplated by 14 C.C.R. § 15378. Even if this Ordinance were subject to CEQA, the City Council finds this Ordinance exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to 14 C.C.R. § 15061(b)(3), because there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment.

LEVINE ACT COMPLIANCE:

This matter does not implicate the disclosure requirements of the Levine Act.

FISCAL IMPACT:
85 Budgeted
CIP 713 K St, O St, P St & 5
th
St Water Rehabilitation
Fund 7110 $3,562,000

Actual project
Fund 7110
R.E.Y Engineers – Design $336,163

Remaining Estimated Project Costs
Fund 7110
Construction $3,225,837

ATTACHMENTS:

K St, O St, P St & 5th St Water Rehab Design Award (CIP 713).DOC1.Reso.2026Jan13.jespartero.docx
K St, O St, P St & 5th St Water Rehab Design Award (CIP 713).DOC3.Attachment B_Exhibit.2026Jan13.jespartero.pdf
K St, O St, P St & 5th St Water Rehab Design Award (CIP 713).DOC2.Attachment A_Task Order.2026Jan13.jespartero.pdf
86 Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TASK ORDER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH R.E.Y ENGINEERS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $336,163 FOR THE DESIGN OF K ST, O ST, P ST & 5TH ST WATER REHABILITATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CIP 713.

WHEREAS, the FY2025-27 Biennium Budget Fund 7110 Water Capital includes funding for Water Rehabilitation in the amount of $3,225,837; and

WHEREAS, K St, O St, P St & 5th St Water Rehabilitation Capital Improvement Project (CIP 713) has been identified as the next critical area necessitating rehabilitation; and

WHEREAS, the originally identified project limits were modified after discussions with Public Works staff and to provide continuity with previous water rehabilitation projects; and

WHEREAS, R.E.Y Engineers, Inc. has performed top quality customer service and demonstrated the ability to prepare construction plans that meet City standards and specifications; and

WHEREAS, a design services proposal was requested from R.E.Y Engineers, Inc. and City staff have found the scope, fee, and schedule to be reasonable and acceptable.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. The City Council of the City Lincoln authorizes:

a. The City Manager to execute a task order for professional services with R.E.Y Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $336,163 for the design of K St, O St, P St, & 5 th St Water Rehabilitation Project (CIP 713).

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

87 Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 2 of 2 ends

___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

88 1000 ft
N ➤ ➤
N
Image © 2025 Airbus
Image © 2025 Airbus
Image © 2025 Airbus
K Street: 1,900 LF 8"
O Street: 950 LF 10" Wtr
P Street: 200 LF 8" Wtr
5th Street (J to M): 1,800 LF 8" Wtr
5th St
4th St
3rd St
O St
K St
J St
1st St 89
Engineering Department
On-Call Contract for Professional Services
Consultant: R.E.Y Engineers, Inc.

Project Name: K St, O St, P St & 5th St
Water Rehabilitation Project, CIP713
Task Order

Date Requested: January 5, 2026
Contract#: ___________

This Task Order, authorized through the On-Call Contract by and between the City of Lincoln (“CITY”), and R.E.Y Engineers, Inc. (“CONSULTANT”), was approved on June 28, 2022, per Resolution No. 2022-158. This Task Order is being requested for the following services (see attachment for the full detailed scope of work).

1. Sub-task 1: Professional engineering services for the K St, O St, P St & 5 th St Water Rehabilitation
Project, CIP 713. This task order will provide funding to support the required professional services needed to design the project.

Consultant shall perform services on the project described above. This Task Order shall not be binding until it has been properly signed by both parties. Upon execution, this Task Order shall supplement the Contract as it pertains to the project described above.

Project Budget –

Project Budget: $336,163.00

Account Code(s): CIP713-801-80070-7110

The work described above and herein attached as the Scope of Work is hereby authorized by the following agency representatives.

Approved by: Approved by:

City of Lincoln R.E.Y Engineers, Inc.

Signature: ________________________ Signature: _________________________ Name: ___________________________ Name: ____________________________ Title: Project Manager _________ Title: _____________________________ Date: _____________________ Date: _____________________

Signature: ________________________ Signature: _________________________ Name: Vin Cay _______________ Name: ____________________________ Title: City Engineer__________________ Title: _____________________________ Date: _____________________ Date: _____________________

Signature: ________________________
Name: Sean Scully_______________
Title: City Manager___________
Date: _____________________

This Task Order is executed this ____ day of _________________, 2026.

Jonnelyn Espartero
1/5/2026
President
James Fisher
90 PROPOSAL – K St, O St, P St, & 5th St Water Rehab January 5, 2026 R.E.Y . ENGINEERS, INC. PROPOSAL

Project Background
The K St, O St, P St, & 5 th St Water Rehab Project (Project) is a locally funded project and has a total budget of $3.5M including design and construction. The project consists of replacing old and deteriorated water pipes, water service lines, and fire hydrants along K Street from 1st Street to 5th Street (1,900 LF), O Street from 3rd Street to 5th Street (950 LF), P Street from the NE corner of the undeveloped parcel at the NW corner of O Street and 3 rd Street (200 LF), and 5th Street from J Street to O Street (1,800 LF). The Project will install approximately 3,900 LF of new 8” water pipe and 950 LF of 10” water pipe along with associated fire hydrants, water services, and water appurtenances including new water sampling stations, if necessary.

The Project connects to several projects previously designed by R.E.Y., including the First Street Waterline Project, Glen Edwards Middle School Water Rehab Project, H, I and J Streets Water Distribution Rehab West Project, and Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24 (which is currently in final design). The Water Distribution Rehab FY 23/24 is designing the improvements along K Street from 1 st Street to 5 th Street, and those improvements will be incorporated into the plan set for this project . We will use information from those previous projects to minimize the cost of designing this project. The northern section of the project is adjacent to Lincoln High School, while the southern section is near Glen Edwards Middle School and First Street Elementary School. To minimize disruptions during school sessions, we will allocate time to coordinate th e design with the school district and incorporate specific requirements into the Contractor’s Traffic Control Plan within the project specifications.

While t here are a few streets within this project’s limits that have pavement in poor condition , there is no plan to include pavement rehabilitation work at this time . Should pavement rehabilitation be added, we will work with the City to establish a mutually agreed upon scope and fee to add those design services. Depending on the extent of pavement rehabilitation, curb ramp improvements may be required. Once the extent of curb ramp improvements is clearly defined, we will work with the City to establish a mutually agreed upon scope and fee to add those design services.

Assumptions
• Project is locally funded.
• No community meetings.
• The fee for a City of Lincoln Encroachment Permit will be waived for field work. • Environmental documentation will be performed by the City. • There will be no utility relocations other than City of Lincoln utilities. • The Project will not require acquisition of additional right of way or easements. • The City will provide any coordination with property owners and obtain any Right of Entry agreements required for work on private property outside of an easement.
• The City will provide the Front End Documents (Notice to Bidders, General Provisions, Agreement (Proposal), etc.). • Up to two (2) bid alternates will be included beginning at the 90% stage. Should additional bid alternates be required to maximize funding, we will work with the City to establish a mutually agreed upon scope and fee to add those design services.
• The contractor will prepare the Water Pollution Control Plan or Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, if required. • The contractor will prepare any and all Construction Sequencing/Staging and Traffic Control Plans. • The contractor will be responsible for perpetuation of survey monuments per §8771. • Minor traffic control measures (no flaggers), consistent with Temporary Traffic Control section of MUTCD, will be implemented during the utility locating and marking activities.

Scope of Services
PHASE 1 – DESIGN
Task 0: Project Management
Provide overall project coordination, administration, and management. We will coordinate all activities with the City Engineer, and/or their designee. Monitor the project budget and deliverable schedules. Perform general, overall project delivery quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) activities per standard industry practices.

Deliverables: 18 monthly invoices and 12 monthly progress updates or reports during the design process.

91 PROPOSAL – K St, O St, P St, & 5th St Water Rehab January 5, 2026 R.E.Y . ENGINEERS, INC. PROPOSAL

Task 1: Kickoff Meeting
R.E.Y. will coordinate and administer the project Kickoff Meeting including representatives from the City’s Public Works Departments. Similar to previous utility projects, we suggest that maintenance personnel from the department attend the Kickoff Meeting. A meeting agenda will be prepared and circulated for feedback prior to the Kickoff Meeting, and a sign-in sheet will be brought to the meeting. After the meeting, meeting minutes including action items will be prepared and transmitted along with the sign-in sheet to the attendees. At the Kickoff Meeting, we plan to discuss:
• Roles and responsibilities
• Team communication
• Project background and overview, including
funding
• Goals and objectives
• Maintenance concerns and considerations
• Schedule
• Critical path
• Upcoming tasks and deliverables
• Action items
• Preliminary Design Site Walk time and location
Deliverables: Meeting agenda and meeting minutes.

Task 2: Utility A Letters
Immediately following the Kickoff Meeting, we will begin the coordination process with the local utility purveyors. We will send Utility A Letters to local utility companies including, but not limited to, City of Lincoln, AT&T, PG&E Gas, PG&E Electric, Wave Broadband, and Consolidated Communications. The letter will request utility maps of facilities within the project limits. Once the maps are obtained, the information will be included in our Base Map. Any fees by the various utilities associated with relocations are assumed to be paid by the City of Lincoln.

Deliverables: Utility company Facilities Maps.

Task 3: Pre-Design Notifications
Prior to any field work, we will work with the City to identify property owners and addresses within and immediately adjacent to the project limits and prepare and mail a Pre-Design Flyer that includes the following information:
• Brief project background, overview, and schedule
• Project limits of the water system improvements
• Notification of upcoming field work for the design and potential impacts • Timeframes for field work and potential impacts
• Consultant working on the City’s behalf for the water system improvements • Project contacts
Deliverables: Pre-Design Flyers.

Task 4: Locate and Mark Existing Underground Facilities Prior to the topographic survey, o ur team will investigate and mark depths of existing utilities within the streets identified for water system improvements. The horizontal location and vertical depths will be a critical step in the preliminary design process.

We strongly believe that this rather inexpensive task will pay dividends for this project.

Our team’s technicians will utilize various non -destructive techniques to identify the location of existing utilities. Geophysical equipment may be used including GPR, Electromagnetic Locators, Ram Rods, etc. to assist in locating lines. Where geophysical equipment is utilized, the investigation will be performed to identify utilities to quality Level B as defined by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). The utilities identified during the investigation will be marked out onsite following the American Public Works Association (APWA) guidelines for the marking of utilities. Nonpermanent water -based paint will be used where permitted. Where paint is not permitted (such as finished decorative surfaces or high traffic customer areas) chalk, wax or other materials may be used.

Deliverables: Utility marks.

92 PROPOSAL – K St, O St, P St, & 5th St Water Rehab January 5, 2026 R.E.Y . ENGINEERS, INC. PROPOSAL

Task 5: Preliminary Design Site Walk
Following the utility locating task, our design team will walk the project limits, mark out a preliminary alignment for the proposed water main, review meter and fire hydrant locations , and discuss tie-in locations. Meeting minutes will be circulated after the site walk summarizing the meeting.

A Water Meter Replacement Table will be prepared and provided to the City for them to complete. The table will include:
• Address
• Meter size
• Meter type
• Meter box type
• Meter box lid material
• Meter box condition
• Meter location/adjacent surfacing
• Water service line size
• Water service line material
• In-tract private service line size
• In-tract private service line material
• Notes/special considerations
Deliverables: Meeting minutes and Water Meter Replacement Table.

Task 6: Land Surveying
Prior to the topographic survey, we will establish a reliable control network which can be used during the full life cycle of the project. The main objective of this project is replacement of approximately 4,850 feet of existing waterline. With this understanding, R.E.Y. will establish survey control in locations that are advantageous for both topographic and constructions surveys. The control will be tied to State Plane Coordinates, as published in the City of Lincoln G.P.S. Control Network – Record of Sur vey No. EDS18 -00309. We assume that the project will proceed with NGVD29 elevations, consistent with the nearby projects we have surveyed for the City.

Once the control network is established and information on existing water meter locations is received from the City, R.E.Y. field crews will collect desired features within the project limits. During this task, the field crews will collect photographs and/or video of the project area to document the existing site conditions. We anticipate that the field survey will include collection of the following information:
• 50-ft cross sections of the existing road including back of walk, top back of curb, flowline, EP, and crown. • Visible existing surface utilities within 10’ of back of curb/walk. • Existing and proposed utility marks.
• Dip information on the existing storm drainage and sanitary sewer structures. • Existing water meter and sewer lateral cleanout locations. • Existing fire hydrant locations.

All features acquired during the field survey will be included in an AutoCAD file and compatible with the City’s GIS system. The AutoCAD file will include a georeferenced orthorectified aerial image of sufficient resolution.

R.E.Y. will research filed survey maps, recorded deeds, assessor’s information, and other documentation easily accessible in the public record. This information will be reviewed and assembled to form a preliminary model of the City’s right of way within the project area. Concurrently with the topographic survey, field crews will tie monuments and boundary evidence that will allow us to merge existing right of way mapping with the topographic survey.

Deliverables: Pre-design photos or videos , Topographic Base Map at a scale of 1”= 40’ with one -foot contours, and AutoCAD files including all images and external references.

Task 7: 65% Plans and Estimate
Once the Base Map is complete, we will prepare the preliminary design and produce the 65% Plans and Estimate to confirm the scope of improvements. During this design effort, we will evaluate potential utility conflicts and determine pothole locations.

The Plans will not include Traffic Control Plans or Construction Sequencing/Staging Plans. Instead, the Specifications for th e project will place that responsibility on the contractor and include parameters for preparing those plans. The Engineer’s Estimate will include a 15% Design Contingency in addition to estimated soft costs for construction including Construction Contingency and Construction Management and Inspection.

Deliverables:
- 65% Plans (2 – 11x17 hard copies and .pdf copy)
- Stamped and Signed 65% Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Cost (1 hard copy and .pdf copy) - All digital files (.dwg, .xlsx, etc.) of the Plans and Estimate

93 PROPOSAL – K St, O St, P St, & 5th St Water Rehab January 5, 2026 R.E. Y . ENGINEERS, INC. PROPOSAL

Task 8: Post-65% Design Meeting
R.E.Y. will coordinate and administer the Post-65% Design Meeting including representatives from the Western Placer Unified School District. At this meeting, we will review the City’s comments on the 65% Plans and Estimate, determine any bid alternates, and discuss the project and potential impacts around the nearby schools with the representatives from the s chool district.

Information obtained at this meeting will be incorporated into the Specifications including potential restrictions on traffic control and construction operations to limit the impact on the nearby schools.

A meeting agenda will be prepared and circulated for feedback prior to the meeting, and a sign-in sheet will be brought to the meeting. After the meeting, meeting minutes including action items will be prepared and transmitted along with the sign -in sheet to the attendees.

Deliverables: Meeting agenda and meeting minutes.

Task 9: Potholing
Based on the results of our preliminary design and feedback received from the City, we will perform potholing at critical crossings to finalize the design for this project. Prior to potholing, we will obtain the necessary City permits and coordinate with USA.

Potholes in asphalt will be made using a vacuum truck, and the pothole s will be backfilled with sand and resurfaced with a minimum of 2” of cold asphalt.

The pothole results will be summarized in a report, and the pothole locations and report will be shown on the Plans and attached to the Specifications for the contractor’s benefit. For the purposes of this proposal, we are estimating up to 32 potholes with traffic control for the intersections and on each street as follows:
5th Street
- Shoulder closure signs.
- Stop/slow paddles.

O Street and P Street
- Informal, reserving traffic control with cones (no stop/slow paddles). - Lower volume roads where vehicle traffic will navigate their way around potholing.

Deliverables: Pothole Report for up to 32 potholes.

Task 10: 90% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
Once the potholing is complete, the Pothole Report has been received, and the Front End Documents have been received; we will prepare the final design and produce the 90% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E). The 90% PS&E will include up to two (2) bid alternates. During this design effort, we will identify any utility conflicts that couldn’t be avoided. For the purposes of this proposal, we have assumed that there will be no utility conflicts with non-City owned utilities. The Special Provisions will be prepared along with a Bid Schedule and estimated number of working days which will be incorporated into the Front End Documents. The Engineer’s Estimate will include a 5% Design Contingency in addition to estimated soft costs for construction including Construction Contingency and Construction Management and Inspection.

Deliverables:
- 90% Plans (2 – 11x17 hard copies and .pdf copy)
- 90% Specifications including the Notice to Bidders, General Provisions, Agreement (Proposal) , and Special Provisions (1 hard copy and .pdf copy)
- Stamped and Signed 90% Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Cost (1 hard copy and .pdf copy) - All digital files (.dwg, .docx, .xlsx, etc.) of the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Task 11: Potentially Affected Parcels
As part of the 90% PS&E submittal, we will include a list of potentially impacted parcels. The list will include potentially affected properties where the project may impact significant landscaping features such as walls, fences, etc . for the City’s use in coordinating with the potentially affected property owners.

Deliverables: Contact list of potentially affected parcel owners along with a brief description of the potential impacts.

Task 12: Post-90% Design Meeting
R.E.Y. will coordinate and administer the Post-90% Design Meeting. At this meeting, we will review the City’s comments on the 90% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate. A meeting agenda will be prepared and circulated for feedback prior to the meeting, and a sign-in sheet will be brought to the meeting. After the meeting, meeting minutes including action items will be prepared and transmitted along with the sign-in sheet to the attendees.

Deliverables: Meeting agenda and meeting minutes.

94 PROPOSAL – K St, O St, P St, & 5th St Water Rehab January 5, 2026 R.E. Y . ENGINEERS, INC. PROPOSAL

Task 13: 100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (Bid Documents) After the Post-90% Design Meeting, we will prepare the final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate for bidding purposes. The Plans and Specifications will be stamped and signed. The Engineer’s Estimate will not include a Design Contingency.

Should separation requirements in the Waterworks Standards in the California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22, Chapter 16, Section 64572 not be achieved , we will obtain a waiver from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Division of Drinking Water.

Deliverables:
- SWRCB Waiver Request Package: Division of Drinking Water Waterworks Standards Main Separation Alternative Request Checklist, Narrative Discussion, Relevant sections of the Plans and Specifications. - Final Stamped and Signed Plans (3 – 24x36 hard copies and .pdf copy) - Final Stamped and Signed Specifications including the Notice to Bidders, General Provisions, Agreement (Proposal), and Special Provisions (1 hard copy and .pdf copy) - Stamped and Signed Final Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Cost (1 hard copy and .pdf copy) - All digital files (.dwg, .docx, .xlsx, etc.) of the Plans, Specifications, and Estimate Task 14: Bid Support
We will assist the City through the bidding process including attending the pre -bid meeting, assisting with bidder questions, assisting with requests for clarification, and preparing bid addendums up to our available remaining budget for this task.

Deliverables: Responses to bidder questions and requests for information and bid addendums.

PHASE 2 – CONSTRUCTION
Task 15: Construction Engineering Support
During construction, we will provide support to the City and construction management team including attending construction meetings as-needed and reviewing and responding to contractor requests for information (RFI’s) up to our available remaining budget.

Deliverables: List of submittals, submittal reviews, and RFI responses.

Task 16: Record Drawings
Following construction, we will prepare record drawings based on red-lines “As-Builts” submitted by the Contractor and Resident Engineer. Record drawings shall be prepared and submitted per City guidelines ( https://www.lincolnca.gov/en/our- government/improvement-planmap-review.aspx).

Deliverables: Record drawings in .pdf format along with all applicable digital files (.dwg, .docx, .xlsx, etc.).

Preliminary Schedule
The following is a preliminary, high-level schedule of the design tasks above:

Tasks 1 – 4: 1 month
Tasks 5 – 6: 2 months
Task 7: 2 months
City Review: 1 month
Tasks 8 & 9: 2 months
Tasks 10 & 11: 2 months
City Review: 1 month
Tasks 12 & 13: 1 month
TOTAL: 12 months from NTP to advertising
Proposed Fee
The following are proposed time and materials not-to-exceed contract amounts for Phase 1 – Design and Phase 2 – Construction:

Design: $316,663
Construction: $19,500
TOTAL: $336,163
95 TASK DESCRIPTION
Assistant Engineer II
Assistant Engineer V
Associate Engineer IV
Senior Engineer III
Principal Engineer II
2-Person Survey
Crew
Senior Technician II
Senior Surveyor III
Principal Surveyor I
Billing Rate $148.00 $185.00 $214.00 $277.00 $345.00 $383.00 $188.00 $277.00 $326.00 0 12 72 12 96 26,652$ -$ 26,652$
1 6 7 13 3,223$ -$ 3,223$
2 8 6 2 16 3,318$ -$ 3,318$
3 4 2 1 7 1,755$ -$ 1,755$
4 4 4 8 1,964$ 19,765$ 21,729$
5 4 8 8 20 4,520$ -$ 4,520$
6 44 40 26 12 122 35,486$ -$ 35,486$
7 104 120 48 16 6 294 54,366$ 100$ 54,466$
8 5 6 11 2,732$ -$ 2,732$
9 24 8 4 1 37 7,605$ 70,171$ 77,776$
10 96 112 64 24 8 304 58,032$ 100$ 58,132$
11 4 2 1 7 1,755$ -$ 1,755$
12 5 6 11 2,732$ -$ 2,732$
13 16 40 18 9 4 87 17,493$ 100$ 17,593$
14 4 6 10 20 4,794$ -$ 4,794$
220 308 198 172 33 44 40 26 12 1,053 226,427$ 90,236$ 316,663$ 15 8 8 24 12 2 54 11,814$ -$ 11,814$
16 24 8 4 4 2 42 7,686$ -$ 7,686$
32 16 28 16 4 96 19,500$ -$ 19,500$
TOTAL HOURS 252 324 226 188 37 44 40 26 12 1,149
TOTAL DOLLARS $37,296 $59,940 $48,364 $52,076 $12,765 $16,852 $7,520 $7,202 $3,912 245,927$ 90,236$ 336,163$

SUBTOTAL

SUBTOTAL
II. Construction
Construction Engineering Support
Record Drawings
Bid Support
Potentially Affected Parcels
Post-90% Design Meeting
100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (Bid Documents) Post-65% Design Meeting
Potholing
90% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
Land Surveying
65% Plans and Estimate
Pre-Design Notifications
Locate and Mark Existing Underground Facilities
Preliminary Design Site Walk
Project Management
Kickoff Meeting
Utility A Letters
I. Design

TOTAL DOLLARS

TOTAL HOURS

TOTAL LABOR COST

TOTAL ODC'S
TOTALS
K St, O St, P St, & 5th St Water Rehab
City of Lincoln
Cost Proposal
January 5, 2026
R.E.Y. Engineers
96 SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Task Order with DKS Associates for Professional Engineering Services in the Amount of $125,000 for the Bikeways Master Plan 2026 Update Project. (Jonnelyn Espartero)
SUBMITTED BY:

Jonnelyn Espartero
DEPARTMENT:

Engineering
DATE:

January 13, 2026

Item Number 11.G

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council to adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Task Order with DKS Associates for professional engineering services in the amount of $125,000 for the Bikeways Master Plan 2026 Update Project.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The City of Lincoln Bikeway Master Plan prepared by Kimley Horn in 2018 requires an update to address bikeways, the open space trail system, recent annexations, and development within the City. This update is required per the California Streets and Highways Code as well as the City of Lincoln General Plan.

The Fiscal Year 2025/2026 budget allocated $125,000 for professional services to update the Bikeways Master Plan.

On November 4, 2025, Request for Proposals (see Attachment A) was published on PlanetBids. Proposals were due on December 12, 2025.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

Three consultants submitted proposals for review (see Attachment C): Kimley-Horn, DKS Associates, and TJKM.

A proposal review panel consisting of engineering staff independently reviewed the proposals.

The selection criteria were outlined in the RFP and consisted of a weighted scale of the following metrics:

STAFF REPORT
97 Project understanding & unique ideas to enhance the project (40 pts) Experience of firm(s) and specific staff (30 pts)
References from former clients (20 pts)
Completeness and compliance with RFP format (10 pts)

EVALUATION SCORES
(based on maximum 100 points)

Kimley-Horn
TJKM
DKS Associates
Reviewer #1
95 90
96 Reviewer #2
94 91
99 Reviewer #3
98 89
97 Average Score

95.7 90.0

97.3 FINAL RANKING
#2
#3
#1
DKS Associates scored highest based on their demonstrated understanding of the work to be completed including the needs of the City of Lincoln and experience with similar kinds of projects.

DKS Associates provided a cost proposal in the amount of $125,000 that was identical to the allocated budget for design services (see Attachment B).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

This Ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), as codified at
Public Resources Code
§§ 21000,
et seq
., and as further governed by 14
California Code
of Regulations
§§ 15000,
et seq
., because it is not a project as contemplated by 14 C.C.R. § 15378. Even if this Ordinance were subject to CEQA, the City Council finds this Ordinance exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to 14 C.C.R. § 15061(b)(3), because there is no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment.

LEVINE ACT COMPLIANCE:

This matter does not implicate the disclosure requirements of the Levine Act.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Budgeted
Fund 2230 – Streets $125,000 Total Project Funding $125,000 98 Actual project costs
Fund 2230
Engineering Design Services – DKS Associates $125,000 Total Project Expenses $125,000

ATTACHMENTS:

Update to Bikeways Master Plan.DOC1.Resolution.2026Jan13.jespartero.docx Update to Bikeways Master Plan.DOC2.Attachment A_RFP.2026Jan13.jespartero.pdf Update to Bikeways Master Plan.DOC3.Attachment B_Task Order.2026Jan13.jespartero- NFE.pdf
Update to Bikeways Master Plan.DOC4.Attachment C_Proposals.2026Jan13.jespartero.pdf 99 Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TASK ORDER WITH DKS

ASSOCIATES FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $125,000 FOR THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN 2026 UPDATE PROJECT

WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln Bikeways Master Plan is due to be updated per the California Streets and Highways Code as well as the City of Lincoln General Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025/26 Budget includes $125,000 for professional services for the Bikeways Master Plan 2026 Update; and

WHEREAS, the project is funded by Fund 2230 – Streets TDA; and

WHEREAS, request for proposals was published on PlanetBids on November 4, 2025; and

WHEREAS, proposals were received from three firms by the due date of December 12, 2025; and

WHEREAS, staff evaluated the proposals and determined that DKS Associates are the most qualified to perform the engineering services for the project.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Lincoln authorizing:

a. The City Manager to execute a task order with DKS Associates for professional engineering services in the amount of $125,000 for the Bikeways Master Plan 2026 Update project.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:

___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
100
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 2 of 2 ends

ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk

101

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE TO THE

BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN

FOR THE

CITY OF LINCOLN

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

Release Date: November 4, 2025
Questions Due: November 24, 2025
Submittal Deadline: 3:00 P.M. December 12, 2025
102

2 Request for Proposals to provide:

UPDATE TO THE BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN

FOR THE

CITY OF LINCOLN

I. BACKGROUND
The City of Lincoln Bikeways Master Pl an prepared by Kimley Horn in 2018 requires an update to address bikeways, the open space trail system, recent annexations, and development within the City. This update is required per the California Streets and Highways Code as well as the City of Lincoln General Plan. The City would like to hire a consultant to prepar e a plan update. For budgeting purposes, the consultant should plan on 1 kick-off meeting, 1 meeting with staff during preparation of the plan, 1 community meeting and 1 meeti ng at City Council for presentation and recommended adoption of the plan. All work must be completed by July 2026. The Bikeway Master Plan update must meet State and Federal requirements so that the City can apply for grant funding to construct ne w bikeways. All requi red elements of the California Bicycle Transportation Act must be met.

II. SCOPE OF SERVICES:

The scope of services for this contract shall include performing all work necessary to model the existing bicycle and open space trail system, model the future systems, and prepare an update to the Bike ways Master Plan document including recommendations of future capital improvem ent projects and their approximate costs.

All sections of the existing master pl an shall be reviewed and updated as necessary.

Services shall include but not be limited to the following:

Task 1 – Project Management & Meetings
a. Prepare all necessary meeting agendas and meeting minutes for the successful completion of this project.
b. Monitor the progress of the pr oject to ensure compliance with City schedule and budget.

Deliverables:
o Summary of services performed with invoices, meeting agendas and meeting minutes.

Task 2 – Data Collection and Analysis
a. Utilize record drawings and field surveys where necessary. b. Utilize available GIS based system data.
c. Utilize General Plan Data.
103

3 d. Utilize Specific Plan Data, where available.

Deliverables:
o Updated exhibit showing existing and proposed bicycle and trail facilities with current City Limits and Sphere of Influence in pdf format and as GIS file.

Task 3 – Master Plan Document
A. Produce Draft Mast er Plan Document
a. Submit draft plan in electronic form for review.
b. Present draft plan at a communi ty meeting. City staff will provide community invitation and a meeting space.

B. Produce Final Mast er Plan Document
a. Produce a final Bikeways Master Plan document that compiles all the results of the preceding tasks.
b. Submit four hard copi es and an electronic copy in both PDF and Microsoft Word.

Deliverables:
o Draft and Final Master Plan Reports.
o Updated GIS file showing existing and proposed bicycle and trail facilities.

III. CONTRACT TIME OF COMPLETION
The duration of services r equired is anticipated to be gener ally from January 2026 to June 2026.

IV. CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
The selected Consultant will be issued a Contract or Task Order. No work is authorized and no payments will be made prior to execution of Contract/Task Order.

V. REQUIRED CONTEN TS OF PROPOSAL
Submit three copies of the proposal. Proposals should be concise and specific to this RFP and limited to 8 single sided pages, exclud ing 1) the cover letter, 2) the cost proposal (in separate sealed envelope) an d 3) full resumes and sample documents included in appendices. Proposals must be in the following format:

1. Consultant Identification:

Provide the legal name of the firm, the firm’s mailing and physical address, the names and contact information of t he legally responsible principal and the primary contact person (Project Manager) for this project.

2. Project Understanding and Work Plan:
104

4 Explain in detail your understanding of proposed work plan, including all anticipated tasks along with any supplem ental tasks (those not specifically identified in this RFP) you deem necessa ry for successful completion of this project. A table shall be provided that identifies the number of labor hours for each phase of the project, by staff level.

3. Related Project/Client Information:

Briefly describe three (3) comparable pr ojects that best exhibit the firm’s experience in each of the required servic es. Include the specific project name and cost, consultant’s contract value, cl ient contact person, including title, organization, address, current telephone number and email address.

4. Individual Staff Experien ce and Project Organization:
i. Provide an organization chart s howing the project manager and key staff members for the project.
ii. Provide a brief bio of each key staff.
iii. Provide a summary of each sub-cons ultant, their area of responsibility and percentage of the project cost.
iv. Provide a realistic statement of current staffing workload commitments, additional resources of t he firm, and ability of the firm(s) to respond to any request for additional or contingency services in a timely manner. v. Provide a statement that the departure, reassignment or substitution for any named member of the designated project team including sub consultant(s) will not be made without t he prior written approval of the City.

5. Cost Proposal:

Include a cost estimate of all requir ed services and associated fees in a separate document and sealed in an envelope entitled “ENGINEERING SERVICES COST PROPOSAL fo r the BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
UPDATE”. The City has budgeted $125,000 fo r this update. Any proposed costs in excess of this amount shall be itemized as Optional Tasks. The cost proposal must:
i. Be broken down by task and personnel category to indicate the level of effort and duration for each task,
ii. Show one hourly rate for each per sonnel category necessary for each task.
iii. Show all sub-consultants and costs.
iv. Show all other charges.
v. Show a “not to exceed” total project estimate.

6. Levine Act Disclosure Statement (Attachment B)
Contractor shall provide a completed Levine Act Disclosure Form (Attachment B). A party to a proceeding before an agen cy involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use, including contracts not competitively bid and awarded to the lowest responsible bidder with a responsive bid shall disclose 105

5 on the record of the proceeding any cont ribution in an amount of more than five hundred dollars ($500) made with t he preceding 12 months by the party or the party’s agent to a City official /campaign. (Gov. Code, § 84308). For additional information:

https://www.lincolnca.gov/our-government/government-transparency/levine- act/.

7. Exceptions
List any exceptions to any portion of this RFP. The City will consider the exception(s) and will determine if th e exception(s) constitute non- responsiveness at the discretion of the City Engineer.

8. Appendices:

Appendices are not required, will not count against the stated page limit, may not be reviewed, and may include:

i. Full resumes of key staff
ii. Full project de scriptions.

VI. SUBMISSION OF THE PROPOSAL
Submit three bound copies and a pdf on a fl ash drive of the pr oposal in a sealed envelope complete with the project name noted on this RFP cover sheet and addressed to:

City of Lincoln, Jonnelyn Espartero
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Attn: City Clerk

PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED no later than the time and date stated on the cover sheet of this proposal an d at the aforementioned location.

Proposals received after this time or at any other loca tion will be deemed unresponsive and rejected.

VII. CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
The City will evaluate and rank the proposals using the following scoring:

Pro
ject Understanding & unique ideas to enhance the project 40 Points Experience of firms(s) and specific staff 30 Points
References from former clients 20 Points
Completeness and compliance with RFP format 10 Points
Total Points Possible 100 Points

Although not anticipated, at th e discretion of the City, one or more of the top ranked teams may be interviewed based upon the relati ve ranking by total score. Interviews 106

6 will be for the purpose of meeting the project team, discussion of the scope of work, and review of the factors considered in the preparation of the proposal. The teams may also be requested to provide further clarification of submitt ed materials and/or submit additional materials for consideration.

After the interviews and review of any addi tional requested materials, the City will begin negotiations with the prime consultant of the top ranked team.

All proposals may become public information s ubsequent to the Prof essional Services Agreement. The Proposer may describe any sensitive or potentially proprietary information in general terms.

The Proposal should reflect the most favorabl e terms available to the City, as the City may make award on the Proposal alone without interviews or any further contact with the Proposer.

VIII. SCHEDULE
The City of Lincoln has designated the following activities and dates as key to the project schedule:

RFP Schedule

1. RFP Issued November 4, 2025

2. Questions Due November 24, 2025

3. Proposal Due @ 3:00 PM December 12, 2025

4. Interviews (if needed) December 17, 2025

5. Approval of contract by City Council Januar y 13, 2026

6. Notice to Proceed Januar y 14, 2026

IX. DOCUMENTS AND QUESTIONS
Direct any questions regarding this RFP to Jonnelyn Espartero by email at [email protected]. All questions and requests for clarification must be received no later than 5 pm on the date noted in the Timeline above. Revisions may be provided via an Addendum. Do not contact any other City staff or consultants to the City.

If addendums are necessary, they will be posted on PlanetBids.

Failure of the proposer to be aware of addenda or failure to acknowledge addenda with the Proposal may be cause for rejection at the sole discretion of the City. Verbal conversations with any person will not modify any term or obligation of this RFP.

X. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS

1. All proposals become the property of the City and will not be returned.

2. All costs for proposal preparatio n shall be borne by the Proposer. 107

7 3. The Proposer may withdraw the Proposal or correct a mistake in the Proposal prior to the Proposal deadline by submitting a withdrawal request or correction/addendum in writing. Oral communication will not be accepted.

XI. ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment A – 2018 Bikeways Master Plan

2. Attachment B – Levine Act Disclosure Statement
108

8 Attachment A
109

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN

BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE
City of Lincoln, California
May, 2018
Prepared for:

Prepared by:
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 300
Sacramento, California 95814
Phone: 916.858.5800
110

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
ii
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
This page left intentionally blank. 111

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ................................................. 1 Purpose ................................................................................ 1 Study Area ........................................................................... 1 Consistency with Other Plans ...................................... 7 Community Participation .............................................. 7 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES ................ 9
Overall System ................................................................... 9 Land Development ........................................................10 Commuting ......................................................................10 Safety Education .............................................................11 Environmental Considerations ..................................11 Funding ..............................................................................12 EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................13 Past Expenditures on Bicycle Facilities ...................13 Existing Bicycle Facilities ..............................................13 Regional Connections ..................................................15 Multi-modal Connections ...........................................15 Support Facilities ............................................................17 Bicycle Safety ...................................................................17 ANALYSIS OF BICYCLE DEMAND .....................21
Existing Major Activity Centers..................................21 Population and Employment Trends .......................21 Bicycle Ridership Levels ...............................................22 Future Land Use and Development .........................22 Future Population and Employment .......................23 BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY ..................................25 Level of Stress Criteria ...................................................25 Existing Roadway Network
Level of Traffic Stress .....................................................26 Existing Network Connectivity ..................................28 Existing Network Undue Detour ...............................31 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION .........................33
Online Engagement .....................................................34 Summary of Public Input .............................................34 PROPOSED SYSTEM .........................................37 Planned Bikeway Projects ..........................................37 Proposed System of Bikeways ...................................39 Top 10 Bikeway Improvements .................................42 Proposed System Low-Stress
Connectivity Comparison............................................46 Future Bicycle Ridership...............................................47

COST AND FUNDING ANALYSIS
......................49
Cost Estimates ................................................................49 Grade Crossing Constraints ........................................49 Monetizing The Societal Benefit
of Bicycling
.......................................................................49 Federal Funding Sources .............................................52 Statewide Funding Sources ........................................53 Local and Regional Funding Sources ......................54 Non-Traditional Funding Sources .............................54 IMPLEMENTATION ...........................................55 Bikeway System Phasing ............................................56

APPENDICES
Design Guidelines ......................................Appendix A Public Survey ................................................ Appendix B Public Comments ........................................ Appendix C Future Development ..................................Appendix D Planned Bikeway Improvements ............Appendix E
Top 10 Cost Estimates .................................Appendix F Top 10 Ridership Estimates ......................Appendix G 2012 BTP CIP Projects ................................Appendix H

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 - Study Area
....................................................... 2 Figure 2 - Existing Bikeways ........................................14 Figure 3 - Transit Services ............................................16 Figure 4 - Bicycle Collisions .........................................19 Figure 5 - Existing Level of Traffic Stress .................27 Figure 6 - Barriers and Gaps ........................................29 Figure 7 - Network Connectivity ...............................30 Figure 8 - Public Comments .......................................35 Figure 9 - Existing and Planned
Bicycle Facilities
...........................................41
Figure 10 - Top 10 Projects ..........................................43 112

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
iv
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
This page left intentionally blank. 113

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
1 INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE
The purpose of the City of Lincoln’s 2018 Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) is to update the City’s proposed future bicycle network, including the City’s bicycle capital improvement list, with the goal of providing a safe, enjoyable, and connected bicycle network for all users within the City of Lincoln. As a dual purpose, this plan demonstrates compliance with the California Bicycle Transportation Act and provides the City of Lincoln a resource document for pursuing discretionary and competitive funding for bicycle infrastructure improvements.

Specifically, the 2018 Bicycle Transportation Plan accomplishes the following:
» updates all required information elements of the California Bicycle Transportation Act; » updates the City’s existing bicycle network to include street and bicycle improvements completed since the previous update in 2012;
» updates the City’s bicycle facility design guidelines to reflect the latest national/regional guidance; » determines the efficacy of the 2012 bicycle capital improvement program and revises these recommendations based on input from the public combined with a comprehensive assessment of bicycle connectivity relative to existing and future development patterns;
» establishes a future bicycle network that connects all areas of significance in the city with facilities and routes that are more in line with the majority of potential bicyclist’s comfort levels; » establishes bicycle demand, mode shift and planning level cost opinions to inform bicycle capital improvement cost- effectiveness for funding prioritization; and,
» establishes a one-stop data source to facilitate the development of future state/federal grant funding applications for bicycle improvements by the City of Lincoln.

As stated above, the 2018 Bicycle Transportation Plan addresses all element required under the California Bicycle Transportation Act (BTA). These requirements are shown in Table 1.

STUDY AREA
The City of Lincoln, California, is located in Placer County, approximately 10 miles north of the City of Roseville and 25 miles north of the City of Sacramento. State Route 65 and State Route 193 bisect the city north and south, and east and west, respectively. The City is approximately 19 square miles in area; however, this plan includes the City limits and its “sphere of influence” , including Village 1 and Village 7 and other Special Use Districts in the City’s General Plan. This plan will provide a blueprint for developing a bikeway system that includes both on-street and off-street facilities as well as support facilities and programs in line with both current and future mobility needs.

The City of Lincoln study area is presented on Figure 1. 114

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
2 NOT TO SCALE
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTY
City of Rocklin
City of Auburn
City of
Roseville
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTY
City of Rocklin
City of Auburn
City of
Roseville
Thunder Valley
Casino
Park-n-Ride
Location
Public
Library
Lincoln Hills
Town Center
Post
Oﬃce
Downtown
Core
Lincoln Crossing
Marketplace
Sterling Point
Shopping Center
Thunder Valley
Casino
Park-n-Ride
Location
Public
Library
Sterling Point
Shopping Center
Lincoln Hills
Town Center
Post
Oﬃce
Downtown
Core
Lincoln Crossing
Marketplace
Lincoln
Regional
Airport

LEGEND
Points of Interest
Schools
Elementary School
Middle School
High School
Future School
Parks/Open Space
Roads
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Nelson LnNelson Ln
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY
Figure 1 — Study Area
115

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
3 Table 1 – California Streets and Highways Code Section 891.2 Required Elements

REQUIRED BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN ELEMENT REPORT

REFERENCE PAGE
A. Estimated number of existing and future bicycle commuters 22-23 B. Map and description of land use and development patterns 22-23; Appendix D C. Map and description of existing and proposed bikeways 13-14; 37; Appendix E D. Description of bicycle parking facilities 13-14; 17
E. Map of transit routes and multi-modal connections 16 F. Description of facilities for changing and storing clothes and equipment 17 G. Description of bicycle safety and education programs 17 H. Description of citizen and community participation 33-35 I. Description of consistency with transportation, air quality, and energy conservation plan 7 J. Cost summary of proposed bicycle projects for Class I, II, and III priorities 50 K. Description of past expenditures and future financial needs for bicycle facilities 13; 49-50

PLANNING AND DESIGN STANDARDS
Bikeway planning and design in California rely on the guidelines and design standards established by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and supporting guides as documented in:
» Chapter 1000; Bicycle Transportation Design, contained in the Highway Design Manual, 6th Edition (California Department of Transportation, 2017) with supporting Chapters 200, 300, and 400. » California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014 Edition, Revision 2 » Caltrans, Design Information Bulletin Number 89, Class IV Bikeway Guidance » Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide, 2015 » American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 2012, Fourth Edition
» National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), Urban Bikeway Design Guide, 2014 » Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MDOT), Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide, 2015 Where possible, it may be desirable to exceed the minimum standards. These guidelines cover basic concepts. The HDM Chapter 1000 contains more detailed standards and guidance and should be followed. The City may also reference the AASHTO Guide, and the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide. Caltrans has supported the NACTO from a memorandum dated August 20, 2013 for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Flexibility. The NACTO addresses more recently developed bicycle design treatments and techniques. It provides options that can help create “complete streets” that better accommodate bicyclists. Many treatments in the NACTO guide are compatible with Caltrans HDM policies and demonstrate new and innovative solutions for the varied urban settings across the country. The vast majority of treatments illustrated in the NACTO guide are either allowed or not precluded from the CA-MUTCD. In addition, non-compliant traffic control devices may be piloted through the CA-MUTCD experimentation process. 116

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
4 This section also references the uniform standards and specifications for traffic control devices under the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA-MUTCD). Given that they are not currently adopted by the FHWA MUTCD or CA MUTCD, a number of recommended devices currently being implemented in California are considered experimental.

Recommended devices that are currently not adopted by the MUTCD or Caltrans appear to be promising improvements in bicycle and pedestrian access and safety as they have been widely used in Europe and experimented within the US. Any jurisdiction wishing to use these treatments should follow the appropriate experimental procedures. Some of the more commonly used devises, such as colored bike lanes, have been given blanket interim approval for use in California. For these, the City only needs to notify Caltrans that it will use these. Bike boxes and colored treatments of shared lane markings are approved for experimentation by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). To conduct these experiments, the City would need to follow the guidelines set forth by the FHWA here: https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/ condexper.htm and to the California Traffic Control Device Committee following their guidelines set forth in Section 1A.10 of the CA MUTCD.

Appendix A provides the Bicycle Facilities Recommended Class Types and Policies memorandum prepared for the 2018 Bicycle Transportation Plan. The following highlights design recommendations specific to the plan update, including the following bicycle facilities:
» Class I Bike Path: Provides a completely separated right-of-way for the exclusive use of bicycles and pedestrians with cross-flow minimized. Caltrans standards call for Class I bikeways to have a minimum of 8 feet of pavement (10 feet preferred) with 2 food graded shoulders on either side. These bikeways must also be at least 5 feet from the edge of a paved roadway.
» Class II Bike Lane: Provides a restricted right-of-way designated for the exclusive or semi-exclusive use of bicycles with through travel by pedestrians and motorists permitted. Caltrans’ standards require a six-inch striped lane with a 4-5-foot paved shoulder for one-way bike travel on a street or highway. » Class III Bike Route: Provides for shared use with pedestrians and/or motor vehicle traffic within the same right- of-way and is designated with signs only indicating “Bike Route” . Class III bike routes are appropriate where restricted right-of-way would make a Class II facility infeasible. » Class IV Bike Lanes: Provides a separated bike lane, or “protected bike lane” , with a physical barrier between the bike lane and the adjacent travel lanes, parking lanes, and sidewalks. Class IV bike lanes may be one-way or two-way.

Separated bike lanes can be separated from motor vehicle traffic by raised medians, concrete curbs, landscaping, on- street parking, bollards, flexible delineator posts, or by a change in elevation between the bike lane and travel lane.

The following facilities or treatments were considered due to the potential for increasing bicyclist visibility, safety, and comfort along bicycle facilities:
» Buffered Bike Lanes (Without On-Street Parking): Provides additional protection and can be considered a Class IV facility, referred to in this plan as a “Class IV-Lite” facility. Painted buffers at least 2-feet in width can be used to narrow travel lanes, which slows traffic, and are most appropriate on wide, busy streets, where physically separating the bike lanes with protected vertical separation is undesirable for cost, operations, or maintenance reasons. Class IV- Lite facilities are useful in providing additional separation between cyclists and motor vehicles where traditional Class IV facilities are not feasible, and where Class II facilities are not adequate. » Buffered Bike Lanes (With On-Street Parking): Provides a painted divider between the bike lane and the adjacent travel lane. Buffers at least 3-feet in width can be used to narrow travel lanes, which slows traffic, and are most appropriate on wide, busy streets, where physically separating the bike lanes with protected vertical separation is undesirable for cost, operations, or maintenance reasons. Double buffered bike lanes provide a painted divider on both the travel lane and the parking lane.
117

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
5 » Colored Bike Lanes: Provides increased visibility for cyclists through the use of green paint on the width of the bike lane. Colored bike lanes can be implemented at intersections to enhanced bicycle visibility at points of conflict with vehicles, or can be used as a continuous treatment spanning the extended length of a bike lane corridor.

The following bicycles facilities were considered due to the potential for increasing bicyclist visibility, safety, and comfort at intersections.
» Bikeway Markings: Continuing marked bicycle facilities at intersections (up to the crosswalk) ensures that separation, guidance on proper positioning, and awareness by motorists are maintained through these potential conflict areas. Colored bike lanes can be implemented at intersections to enhanced bicycle visibility at points of conflict with vehicles.
» Bike Pockets and Boxes: Provides bicyclists with a safe and visible way to get ahead of queuing traffic during the red signal phase.

Cross-sections for bicycle facilities Class I, II, III, and IV-Lite, as referred to in this plan, are provided below, with recommended lane widths.
10’-12’
4’-8’
4’-8’ 2’
Min
2’
Min 4’-8’
4’-8’
Class I – Bike Path
10’-12’
4’-8’
4’-8’ 2’
Min
2’
Min 4’-8’
4’-8’
Class II – Bike Lane
8’-12’
118

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
6 Class III – Shared Bike Route
10’-12’
4’-8’
4’-8’ 2’
Min
2’
Min 4’-8’
4’-8’
Class IV-Lite – Buffered Bike Lane without On-Street Parking 119

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
7 CONSISTENCY WITH OTHER PLANS
This Plan ensures consistency with the following planning documents:
» 2012 City of Lincoln Bicycle Transportation Plan
» 2017 PCTPA Regional Bikeway Plan/Network
» Sacramento County Bicycle Master Plan
» SACOG 2016 Metropolitan Transportation Plan and
Sustainable Community Strategy for 2035
» City of Lincoln General Plan
» Village 1 Specific Plan
» Village 7 Specific Plan
» Placer County Sunset Industrial Area + Placer Ranch
Development Draft Study and DEIR
» Placer County Bikeway Master Plan
» Revised Twelve Bridges Specific Plan
» Twelve Bridges Golf Cart Circulation Plan
» The City of Lincoln Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) Transportation Plan
» Lincoln Crossing Specific Plan
» General Development Plan and Golf Cart Transportation Plan for Del Webb – Lincoln Hills
» Gladding Parkway EIR

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Community participation is a vital component of this plan for obtaining input on existing bicycling facilities, potential roadways for improvement to accommodate bicycles, and the type of support facilities or programs needed to improve bicycling within the City of Lincoln. The development of the plan was based on an advocacy planning approach between City staff, interested organizations, and citizens. The public outreach approach of this plan includes the following:
» A thorough review of existing plans and studies to determine what exists today. » Direct input from the City staff about what development is planned for the future and what will be needed to accommodate that growth.
» A public presentation and workshop to incorporate citizen and community input. » A refinement process that takes into account the following bikeway planning criteria • Safety – The system should provide the highest level of safety feasible. • Coverage – The system should provide balanced access from the City’s activity centers for commuting and recreation purposes.
• Connectivity – The system should provide bikeway connections to major activity centers, multi-modal transfer locations, regional connections, and should integrate with golf cart and NEV facilities as appropriate. • Use – The proposed system should reflect use levels that are commensurate with the intended level of investment • Standards – The system should reflect the appropriate Class of bicycle facility consistent with Caltrans’ design standards.

A Public Workshop was held on Thursday, December 7, 2018 at the City of Lincoln. A second Public Workshop was held on Thursday, April 19, 2018, to share results of the plan. Community participation is discussed in more detail in a following “Community Participation” section.
120

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
8 2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
This page left intentionally blank. 121

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
9 GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES
The inclusion of goals, objectives, and policies for this plan are intended to provide specific direction on the necessary actions involved in planning, designing, funding, and constructing bicycle facilities in the City of Lincoln. The following information relies on an understanding of the relationship between the proposed bikeway system, key issues facing implementation of specific routes, and the requirements of local, state, and federal funding programs. The goals and policies are organized by topic areas that relate to specific implementation issues. The topic areas include:
» Overall System;
» Land Development;
» Commuting;
» Safety Education;
» Environmental Considerations
» Funding.

The purpose of organizing this section by topic area is to provide City staff, decision makers, and citizens with clear and concise policy direction and guidance on how to implement the bicycle facilities proposed in this plan. Each topic area addressed below includes an overall goal, measurable objective, and policies with specific action statements related to the development of specific facilities or programs within the City of Lincoln.

OVERALL SYSTEM
The following goal and policy statements express the philosophy behind this plan and the proposed system of bikeways.

The statements stem from the City’s desire to provide residents and visitors with a connected bikeway/path system that can accommodate both commute and recreational trips throughout the City.

GOAL 1: Provide a well-connected bikeway system within the City of Lincoln to improve the quality of life for all residents and visitors.

Objective: Construct priority bikeways identified in the proposed system map and provide for the maintenance of both existing and new facilities.

Policies

1.1 P repare and maintain a Bikeway Master Plan that identifies existing and future needs, and provides specific recommendations for facilities and programs including adequate provisions for bicycle and pedestrian use, golf carts, and neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs) to, within, and from the City of Lincoln.

1.2 R equire all bikeways to conform to design standards contained in the latest version of the Highway Design Manual, Chapter 1000: Bikeway Planning and Design, Caltrans, unless otherwise established by the City.

1.3 C onsider a proposed route’s importance in providing access and connectivity to adjacent bicycle facilities and destinations when recommending bike routes for implementation.

1.4 C oordinate with Placer County, City of Rocklin, and City of Roseville regarding the implementation of the proposed system of bikeways.

1.5 P rovide bicycle connections that allow for regional bike travel to and from the City of Lincoln.

1.6 I ntegrate bicycle planning with other community planning, including land use and transportation planning.

1.7 Ensur e proposed Class II bike lanes are consistent with the City of Lincoln NEV Transportation Plan.

1.8 A s funding allows, implement the proposed bikeway system in this Bikeway Master Plan in a cost effective manner. 122

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
10 LAND DEVELOPMENT
As shown in the population and employment growth expectations, the City of Lincoln has significant planned development over the next 20 years. Proposed development projects should adhere to the policy statements below regarding access, mobility, and support facilities for bicyclists and pedestrians.

GOAL 2: Include bicycle facilities in all appropriate development projects to facilitate on-site circulation for bicycle and pedestrian travel, on-site bicycle parking, and connections to the proposed system of golf cart and NEV facilities.

Objective: Maximize the number of daily trips made by bicycling to and from new development projects within the City of Lincoln.

Policies

2.1 R equire new development projects to reserve the right-of-way for multi-use trails shown in the proposed system of bikeways.

2.2 M eet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act when constructing facilities contained in the proposed system, where applicable.

2.3 P rovide pedestrian/bicycle crossings at appropriate intervals along new roadways that will adequately serve new large-scale commercial office, industrial development, and residential development.

2.4 Provide one mile of pedestrian/bicycle trails per 2,500 population (Amended Public Facilities Element 2008).

2.5 A dhere to specific policies contained within adopted plans and specific plans relating to the design, implementation, and function of bikeways and pedestrian facilities within the City of Lincoln.

2.6 Encourage ne w commercial development to provide bicycle and pedestrian access to surrounding residential areas.

2.7 Encourage ne w commercial development to place required bike racks near entrances for employees and customers.

COMMUTING
Commuters that bicycle to the City can represent a larger percentage of total commute trips if a comprehensive network of interconnected bicycle facilities is developed. This plan proposes to implement such a system as defined by the following goal and policy statements.

GOAL 3: Increase bicycle trips to work to reduce vehicle congestion, improve air quality, conserve energy use, and improve individual physical fitness.

Objective: Develop a system of bikeways that provides direct routes between residential areas and to major employment centers.

Policies

3.1 P rovide connections to the proposed system from all existing and future transit facilities and transferpoints.

3.2 Encourage emplo yers to install and/or maintain support facilities such as bicycle racks, personal lockers, and showers at appropriate locations to promote bicycle use.

3.3 Emplo yers should encourage employees to consider bicycling as an alternative mode for commuting to and from employment centers.

3.4 Emplo yers should be actively involved in implementing Ordinance No. 604B relating to the City’s Ridesharing Program. The provisions of Ordinance 604B provide for the following:
123

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
11 • Identifies a “Major project controller” as an employer or common work location with 100 or more employees working at a single site for at least 20 hours per week. • Identifies a “Transportation Control Measure (TCM) Coordinators” as an individual assigned by the Placer County Transportation Commission to assist member jurisdictions in complying with the provisions of trip reduction ordinances. • Requires an annual commute survey as part of the annual reporting requirement on ridesharing. • Identifies a “new project” as a project which would allow a use or number of uses that, individually or collectively, would employ 100 or more employees at one common work location. • Identifies a “project expansion” as an existing project which would allow a use or uses that, individually or collectively, after expansion, may both (1) generate employment for 100 or more employees and (2) increase the total number of employees at the common work location by twenty percent or more from the applicant’s base- line employment.
• States that assistance in transportation plan preparation will be provided by the City through the TCM Coordinator who will be provided to the City by the Placer County Transportation Commission. • Identifies that the Rideshare Coordinator will be responsible for conducting an annual commute survey as part of the employer’s annual reporting requirements.

SAFETY EDUCATION
Safety education is an important aspect of increasing bicycle use. If bicyclists or potential bicyclists perceive that the bikeway system is unsafe, they will be discouraged from using it. Therefore, the following goal and policy statements are intended to improve the user’s knowledge of how to use the bikeway system safely.

GOAL 4: Educate all residents of the City of Lincoln about how to use bikeway and trail facilities safely.

Objective: Improve bicycle safety in the City of Lincoln by providing a system of connected routes that minimize conflicts with autos, golf carts, NEVs and pedestrians.

Policies

4.1 P lay an active role in educating residents about bicycle and pedestrian safety in conjunction with public and private schools and civic organizations.

4.1 Use a vailable collision data to monitor bicycle collisions and locations and target education programs and/or improvements in those locations.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Bicycle facilities are generally considered to benefit the environment because their use reduces demand for motorized travel and promotes beneficial lifestyle changes. Nevertheless, the construction of specific bikeway improvements may adversely affect the physical environment. The following goal and policy statements have been developed to avoid and minimize potential impacts to the environment.

GOAL 5: Avoid adverse environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed system.

Objective: Mitigate potentially significant impacts to a level of less than significant. 124

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
12 Policies

5.1 C onduct site-specific environmental review consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act for individual bicycle projects as they advance to the implementation stage of development.

5.2 S olicit and consider community input in the design and location of bicycle facilities that connect to neighborhoods.

5.3 C onsider the effect on other transportation facilities such as travel lane widths, turn lanes, on-street parking, and on- site circulation when planning and designing on-street bikeways.

FUNDING
To obtain the funding required to implement the proposed system, the City of Lincoln must take advantage of funding sources at the state and federal level. It will also require a commitment of local funding.

GOAL 6: Acquire sufficient funding to construct the proposed system within the next 20 years.

Objective: Maximize the amount of local, state, and federal funding sources for bicycle facilities that can be used by the City of Lincoln for the implementation of the proposed system.

Policies

6.1 P eriodically update current information regarding regional, state, and federal funding programs for bicycle facilities along with specific funding requirements and deadlines.

6.2 Wher e feasible, consider joint grant applications with other agencies, such as the City of Roseville, City of Rocklin, and/or Placer County, for state and federal funds.
125

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
13 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section of the Plan documents existing bicycle infrastructure and facilities in the City of Lincoln to determine the availability and status of safe and connected bicycle travel for City residents. Information concerning existing bicycle infrastructure and facilities was collected from the 2012 BTP , the City of Lincoln, the Public Workshop (December 7, 2017), and a site-visit conducted in November 2017.

PAST EXPENDITURES ON BICYCLE FACILITIES
Since the adoption of the 2012 BTP , the following bikeway improvements have been implemented:
» Bicycle racks installed on Lincoln Blvd in the downtown area » Class II lanes on 3rd Street from the western terminus to D Street » Class II lanes on O Street from 1st Street to 9th Street/Nicolaus Road » Class II lanes on Sorrento Parkway from Ferrari Ranch Road to Moore Road » Class II lane (East side only) on Moore Road from Sorrento Parkway to dead end at the Lincoln Bypass » Removed Class II lanes on Eastridge Drive from Twelve Bridges Drive to Dinis Cottage (to allow for on street parking)

EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
The existing roadway network in the City of Lincoln consists of 50.54 centerline miles of City owned roadways and approximately 5 miles of state owned facilities that traverse the City. Inclusive of the recent improvements described above, of the City’s existing roadway centerline miles, 19% provides Class II bike lanes. A significant portion of these roadways are local residential streets with posted speeds of 25 miles per hour. In addition, a significant portion of Class II facilities have parallel neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV) lanes approximately 8-feet in width. The 19% of Class II network translates to approximately 198,415 linear feet (37.5 miles) of roadway providing bi-directional Class II facilities within the City of Lincoln.

There are currently 127,310 linear feet (or 24 miles) of Class I bicycle facilities within the City of Lincoln. Approximately 42% of Class I facilities are located in the Del Webb community area, and 31% are located along or parallel to Joiner Parkway and Ferrari Ranch Road, including the Class I trail along the Auburn Ravine. Other disjointed Class I facilities are located in north Lincoln along Joiner Parkway/Venture Drive and south Lincoln near Twelve Bridges Drive. Additionally, there is a disconnected Class I facility along East Avenue between 12th Street and McBean Park Drive.

Although 1st Street east of Joiner Parkway has Class II bicycle lanes, the lane striping (white paint) is difficult to observe for both motorist and cyclists, and is therefore not considered to provide adequate Class II connectivity. For several roadways without bi-directional bike lanes, such as Ferrari Ranch Road east of Lincoln Boulevard, and Joiner Parkway/ Venture Drive north of Nicolaus Road/9th Street, Class I facilities are provided. Additionally, several roadways are designated as Class III bicycle routes due to the presence of “share the road” signs, such as along East Avenue between the existing Class I facility.

The City of Lincoln’s existing bikeway network is shown on Figure 2. Existing bicycle parking facilities are located at key downtown locations, as shown on Figure 1.
126

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
14 NOT TO SCALE
P
P
P
P
P
P
LEGEND
Roads
Bicycle Facili�es
Exis�ng Class I
Exis�ng Class II
Exis�ng Class II (Faded)
Exis�ng Class II (NEV)
Golf Cart Path
Bicycle Parking Facility
Parks/Recrea�on
P
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Nelson LnNelson Ln
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY
Figure 2 — Existing Bikeways
127

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
15 REGIONAL CONNECTIONS
The City of Lincoln is bordered by unincorporated Placer County. The City of Roseville and the City of Rocklin are located to the south with primary access from Highway 65, Industrial Boulevard, and Joiner Parkway. The Town of Loomis and the City of Auburn are located short distances east of Lincoln with primary access from Highway 193. Designated bikeways providing regional connections to surrounding communities do not currently exist. New proposed connections that have potential as regional connections include Industrial Boulevard, Nicolaus Road, and SR 193. Proposed system connections are discussed in subsequent sections of this plan.

The Town of Loomis recently completed its 2010 Bicycle and Trails Master Plan. Except for sidewalks located in the downtown area of Loomis, a trail system within the Town does not currently exist. The Town of Loomis currently has no Class I bike paths, 6.5 miles of Class II bike lanes, and no designated Class III routes. The Town of Loomis, through its Bicycle Transportation and Trails Plan, is committed to creating a more bicycle-friendly community with connections to adjacent jurisdictions. The 2008 City of Roseville Bicycle Master Plan provides for bicycle connections to Sierra College Boulevard with connections to Twelve Bridges Drive and ultimately SR 193.

MULTI-MODAL CONNECTIONS
Multi-modal connections in the City of Lincoln and South Placer County are especially important due to Lincoln’s distance from other communities and barriers to bicycle travel such as the lack of existing continuous bicycle facilities and high- speed roadways. A transit center currently exists at Third and F Streets serviced by Lincoln Transit and Placer County Transit. The various transit services that serve South Placer County are described below. Maps of the various service areas and key transfer points within the City of Lincoln are provided n Figure 3.

Lincoln Transit
Lincoln Transit currently operates two fixed routes known as the downtown Circulator and Lincoln Loop. Both routes operate on one-hour headways (at each stop, buses arrive every hour). Each bus is equipped with two bike racks. The Downtown Circulator operates in Historic Downtown Lincoln and along Highway 65 with stops near City Hall (6th Street), downtown retail centers, Safeway Center, Twelve Bridges Library, Twelve Bridges Medical Center, and Kaiser Permanente.

The service begins each morning at the Lincoln Transfer Point at Third and F Streets. The Circulator connects daily with the Lincoln Loop and the Placer County Transit’s Lincoln/Rocklin/Sierra College route.

The Lincoln Loop operates throughout the city with stops at several schools, parks, community centers, and major activity centers. The route beings daily at the southwest corner of Venture and lakeside Drives. It continues to the Lincoln Transfer Point at Third and F Streets and then to destinations throughout the city.

Lincoln Transit Dial-A-Ride (DAR) is a complimentary curb-to-curb Para-transit service for the general public. DAR operates in the city limits of Lincoln on a reservation basis.

Placer County Transit (PCT)
Transit riders in Placer County can make a connection to Lincoln’s Historic Downtown and points in between at the Twelve Bridges Transfer Point via the Lincoln Transit Downtown Circulator. Transfers are free. The Taylor Road Shuttle operated by PCT stops at the Penryn Park and Ride near King Road and the Loomis Park and Ride located at I-80 and Horseshoe Bar Road. Additional information is located at www.placer.ca.gov/transit.

Roseville Transit
Roseville Transit offers local fixed-route service throughout Roseville but does not serve the City of Lincoln. Riders can transfer to PCT at Thunder Valley to reach destinations within the City of Lincoln. Additional information is located at www. roseville.ca.us/transit.
128

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
16 Figure 3 — Transit Services

NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
Roads
Transit Routes
Lincoln Circulator
Lincoln/Sierra College
Transit Stops
Lincoln Circulator Stop
School “Tripper” Stop
Park-n-Ride
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Nelson LnNelson Ln
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY
129

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
17 SUPPORT FACILITIES
Bikeway support facilities include physical infrastructure designed to accommodate or promote the use of bicycles.

Examples include bicycle racks, bicycle lockers, restrooms, and shower facilities. A windshield survey of major shopping centers, schools, parks, and employment centers found bike racks located at most major commercial centers in the City.

The Lincoln Transit District provides a rack that holds two bikes on the front of all buses. The City of Lincoln provides bike parking at City Hall, 600 Sixth Street. In addition, all recent shopping centers have bike racks as a condition of their approval. Several newer projects in the downtown core have street tree grates with tree guards that qualify as informal bike racks for bicyclists. Support facilities are important because potential riders can be discouraged from riding if they think that their bicycle may be stolen, vandalized or if sufficient facilities are not provided to make bicycling convenient, particularly for commute purposes.

In many cities and counties, the installation of secure bicycle parking is required as part of local transportation system management plans or the zoning code. For example, Yuba City, CA requires the provision of bicycle racks as part of their zoning code while similar requirements apply in the City of Roseville as part of their transportation systems management program. The City of Lincoln, as part of their rideshare program, requires that bicycle parking facilities be made available at the request of any tenant or employee participating in the program whose primary mode of commuting is by bicycle.

Parking facilities are not currently required as part of the City of Lincoln zoning code.

BICYCLE SAFETY
Collision data was provided by the California Highway Patrol Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) statistics, and by the City of Lincoln, for the five-year period between 2012 and 2016. According to these two datasets, approximately 25 collisions involving a bicyclist occurred in the City of Lincoln during that five-year period. Figure 4 presents the location of bicycle collisions during this five-year period. Table 2 presents bicycle collision severity by year.

Table 3 presents bicycle collisions by severity type.

No bicyclist fatalities were reported between 2012 and 2016; however, as shown in Table 2 and Table 3, 23 of the 25 collisions resulted in bicyclist injury. Additionally, the roadways with the highest number of collisions were Lincoln Boulevard (4 collisions), McBean Park Drive (3 collisions), and Ferrari Ranch Road (3 collisions), and approximately half of all bicycle collisions occurred at intersections.

Bicycle Safety Programs
A summary of safety programs that have been implemented within the City is described below:
» Bicycle Rodeos - are designed to teach the rules of the road and safe riding practices to school age bicyclists. » Bicycle Helmet Enforcement Program - is conducted by the Lincoln Police Department and focuses on issuing warnings to students who do not ride with a bicycle safety helmet. A warning card that includes discounts for purchasing bicycle helmets is given to violators.
» Bicycle Helmet Distribution Program - Approximately 250 helmets are given away annually to local students. » Bicycle Safety Instruction - Lincoln Police Department conducts bicycle safety instruction at local elementary schools at the beginning of the school year.
» Helmet Safety Program – Sponsored by UC Davis Trauma Center Outreach Program., this program provides instruction on helmet safety.

130

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
18 Table 2 – Bicycle Collision Severity by Year

YEAR INJURY
(COMPLAINT OF PAIN)
INJURY
(OTHER VISIBLE)

PROPERTY

DAMAGE ONLY
GRAND
TOTAL
2012 1 2 3
2013 4 1 5
2014 2 3 5
2015 4 4 8
2016 1 2 1 4
TOTAL 12 11 2 25
Table 3 – Bicycle Collision Frequency by Location

INTERSECTION PRIMARY ROAD SECONDARY
ROAD
INJURY
(COMPLAINT

OF PAIN)
INJURY
(OTHER

VISIBLE)

PROPERTY
DAMAGE
ONLY
GRAND
TOTAL
No
1st Street Joiner Parkway 1 1
2nd Street D Street 1 1
5th Street H Street 1 1
12th Street Buckboard Lane 1 1
Lincoln Boulevard
6th Street 1 1
7th Street 1 1
Lincoln Boulevard
96 1 1
Lincoln Boulevard
270 1 1
McBean Park Drive A Street 1 1
Lincoln Boulevard 1 1
Nicolaus Road Joiner Parkway 1 1
Spring Valley
Parkway Blue Heron Loop 1 1
Stoneridge
Boulevard
Spring Valley
Parkway 1 1
Yes
1st Street Lincoln Boulevard 1 1
3rd Street H Street 1 1
7th Street J Street 1 1
Danbury Drive Groveland Lane 1 1
Danbury Drive
Ingram Parkway 1 1
Joiner Parkway 1 1
Route 65 1 1
Groveland Lane Joiner Parkway 1 1
Joiner Parkway Stanmark Drive 1 1
Lakeside Drive Floradale Way 1 1
McBean Park Drive D Street 1 1
Danbury Drive 1 1
TOTAL 12 11 2 25
131

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
19 Figure 4 — Bicycle Collisions

NOT TO SCALE
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Nelson LnNelson Ln
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY
LEGEND
Roads
Bicycle Collisions
Resul�ng in Injury
Resul�ng in no Injury
132

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
20 2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
This page left intentionally blank. 133

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
21 ANAL YSIS OF BICYCLE DEMAND
The objective of analyzing bicycle demand is to identify existing bicycle ridership levels and travel patterns, along with projected future use and possible methods for stimulating additional ridership. This section provides information about City of Lincoln projections for population and employment and their influence on bicycle travel demand.

EXISTING MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTERS
One purpose of a BTP is to provide facilities that connect residential areas to employment, commercial, educational, and recreational centers. These facilities support bicycle travel demand for both commuter and recreational trip purposes.

Major activity centers in the City of Lincoln include regional commercial areas such as Sterling Pointe Shopping Center, Lincoln Hills Town Center, Lincoln Crossing Marketplace, Joiner Parkway Corridor, and the downtown core. In addition, employment centers, schools, parks, the Thunder Valley Casino and Lincoln Regional Airport serve as potential destinations for bicyclists. Major activity center locations are identified in Figure 1.

POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT TRENDS
The following discussion contains estimates of existing and future projections of population and employment levels to determine trends and how they affect demand for bicycle facilities.

Existing Population
In 2011, the City of Lincoln had an estimated total population of 43,144 persons. This number rose to 43,572 by 2012, increasing to 45,675 in 2016. Table 4 shows a comparison of population estimates for the City of Lincoln and several surrounding cities and Placer County.

Table 4 – Population Estimates and Comparisons (2015 to 2016) JURISDICTION 2015 2016 % CHANGE
City of Lincoln 45,038 45,675 1.4%
Auburn 13,785 13,858 0.5%
Loomis 6,648 6,690 0.6%
Rocklin 59,727 60,509 1.3%
Roseville 126,327 128,276 1.5%
Placer County 366,280 370,571 1.2%
Source: US Census, 2012-2016 ACS Data
Existing Employment
The City of Lincoln has a labor force of approximately 36,048 persons and employment of approximately 17,203 persons over 16 years of age. The current unemployment rate for the City of Lincoln is 7.0%, compared with Loomis Town (7.6%), Auburn (7.6%), Rocklin (7.3%), and Roseville (6.5%) (Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates).
134

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
22 BICYCLE RIDERSHIP LEVELS
Bicycle ridership levels are not easily measured or projected for an entire City without extensive data collection efforts.

Bicycle ridership varies widely among different jurisdictions. For jurisdictions with similar populations, land use density, and bicycle system quality, bicycled mode split typically varies from one to three percent. The City of Lincoln General Plan provides for increased land use densities in many areas and villages that will contribute the attractiveness of non-auto modes of travel such as bicycling. The transition to a denser land use pattern could increase the City’s bike mode split from 0.7 percent to between one and three percent.

Existing Ridership Levels
A common term used in describing demand for bicycle facilities is “mode split.” Mode split describes the percentage of people selecting a certain means of transportation within a jurisdiction. Mode split is often used in evaluating commuter alternatives such as bicycling, where the objective is to increase the “split” or percentage of people selecting an alternative means of transportation. From the 2012-2016 Census data, mode split information is available for home-to-work trips for the City of Lincoln. City of Roseville, and City of Rocklin. This information is presented in Table 5.

Table 5 – Mode Split for Home-to-Work Trips
Mode Lincoln Rocklin Roseville
Drove alone 78.6% 81.6% 79.5%
Carpooled 10.5% 7.1% 8.8%
Public transportation (no taxicab) 1.0% 1.1% 1.1%
Walked 0.6% 1.0% 1.9%
Bicycle 0.7% 0.6% 0.8%
Taxicab, motorcycle, or other means 1.5% 1.2% 1.0%
Worked at home 7.0% 7.5% 7.0%
Source: US Census, 2012-2016 ACS Data
As shown in Table 5, less than one percent of home-to-work trips for the cities of Lincoln, Rocklin, and Roseville are made by bicycle.

FUTURE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
The City of Lincoln future development map and approved development list is presented in Appendix D. The City of Lincoln development includes the following approved residential projects:

1. Twelve Bridges Villages 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, Education Foundation

2. Lakeside 6: Phase 2, 7 & 8

3. Senior Living at Lincoln in Twelve Bridges

4. Meadowlands

5. Magnolia Village

6. Independence
135

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
23 7. Village 1
a. Epick 1, 2 & 3
b. La Bella Rosa
c. Walkup Ranch
d. Turkey Creek Estates
e. Hidden Hills
f. Enclave

8. Fullerton Ranch

9. Cypress Meadows/Cresleigh Grove

10. E. 10th Street

11. Riverwalk Villas

12. Crocker Knoll

13. Village 7

14. Joiner Ranch

15. Summerset Assisted Living Facility – Downtown

16. Lincoln Crossing Village 11
The City of Lincoln development includes the following approved commercial projects.

1. Quick Quack Car Wash

2. America’s Tire

3. Les Schwab Tires

4. tarbucks

5. Hotel in Parkway Pointe

6. Property north of Fire Station on Joiner Parkway

7. Northeast corner of Lincoln Boulevard and Ferrari Ranch Road

8. Twelve Bridges Commercial

9. Twelve Bridges Employment-Center

10. Village 1 – southeast corner of Highway 193 and Oak Tree Lane

11. Village 7 Commercial
136

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
24 FUTURE POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT
Future population and employment 20-year forecasts have been developed for both the City of Lincoln and the City’s Sphere of Influence. Future forecasts assume the development of the seven villages in the Sphere of Influence (Village 1 through 7 were annexed in 2017). The City of Lincoln anticipates a future population of approximately 55,857 persons and approximately 16,461 employees, as presented in Table 6.

Table 6 – Future Population and Employment Forecasts

BOUNDARY/AREA FUTURE POPULATION FUTURE EMPLOYMENT
Lincoln 55,857 16,461
Lincoln SOI 26,414 7,760
Total City and SOI 82,271 24,221

Village 1 5,823 155
Village 2 348 -
Village 3 391 -
Village 4 67 -
Village 5 3,394 966
Village 6 3,245 377
Village 7 8,081 1,003
Total Village 21,349 2,501
As shown, the City’s population is expected to almost double within the next 20 years. The City’s employment is expected to increase by approximately 7,000 persons within the next 20 years. It is anticipated that bicycle ridership levels will increase accordingly.
137

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
25 BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY
The City of Lincoln has a significant amount of existing bicycle infrastructure, with Class II bicycle lanes on approximately 19% of existing local roadway infrastructure, and an additional 12 miles of Class I bicycle facilities within the City limits.

However, due to high vehicular speeds on major roadways, incomplete or discontinuous bicycle infrastructure, and a lack of adequate bicycle protection at some intersections, many existing bicycle routes may not be suitable for all user-types, nor do they necessarily provide complete connections to key destinations throughout the City.

In addition, the City of Lincoln is characterized by many residential areas that are served by low-speed (< 25 mph) local streets. However, many of these residential areas are encircled by high speed, major roadways – some of which provide no bicycle infrastructure. High vehicular speeds and discontinuous bicycle routes can create stressful conditions for a majority of potential bicycle users. These conditions can preclude “true” city-wide bicycle connectivity which in turn discourages bicycling as a viable mode option relative to the automobile. As such, the level of stress experienced by a cyclist becomes the determining factor of bicycle infrastructure connectivity, rather than the presence of the infrastructure itself.

Level of traffic stress, as defined by the Mineta Transportation Institute’s Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity report (2012), provides thresholds of cyclist tolerance for on-street bicycle facilities as determined by the roadway conditions of the shared route. A “level of traffic stress” (LTS) score between 1 and 4 is then assigned to the roadway, where 1 represents a level of stress that the majority of the cycling public, including children, can tolerate, and 4 represents a level of stress tolerated only by those characterized as “strong and fearless” cyclists. For purposes of this study, roadways classified as LTS 1 or 2 reflect low-stress facilities for which the vast majority of the City’s population would feel comfortable bicycling on. Conversely, a roadway with an LTS score of 3 or 4 reflects medium to high-stress conditions that only a small percentage of accomplished cyclists would feel at ease using.

The ultimate goal is to improve the overall connectivity of the low-stress bicycle network. The greater the access to the low-stress network and the greater number of origin and destination pairs it serves, the more attractive bicycling becomes as a modal option for a larger segment of the population.

LEVEL OF STRESS CRITERIA
Criteria used to determine the LTS score for roadways include the following:
» Road width (number of through travel lanes)
» Vehicular traffic speed limit
» The presence and width of a parking lane (diagonal or parallel) » The presence and width of a bicycle lane
Criteria used to determine the LTS score for intersections include the following:
» Right-turn vehicular channelization (right-turn pocket length or shared through/right-turn lane) » The presence and location of a bicycle lane pocket at the intersection » Signalized traffic control or side-street stop-control Table 7 presents the LTS category summaries as defined by the Mineta Transportation Institute. 138

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
26 Table 7 – Level of Traffic Stress Categories

LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS
(L TS) DESCRIPTION
LTS 1
Presenting little traffic stress and demanding little attention from cyclists, and attractive enough for a relaxing bike ride. Suitable for almost all cyclists, including children trained to safely cross intersections. On links, cyclists are either physically separated from traffic, or are in an exclusive bicycling zone next to a slow traffic stream with no more than one lane per direction, or are on a shared road where they interact with only occasional motor vehicles (as opposed to a stream of traffic) with a low speed differential. Where cyclists ride alongside a parking lane, they have ample operating space outside the zone into which the car doors are opened. Intersections are easy to approach and cross.

LTS 2
Presenting little traffic stress and therefore suitable to most adult cyclists but demanding more attention than might be expected from children. On links (roadway segments), cyclists are either physically separated from traffic, or are in an exclusive bicycling zone next to a well-confined traffic stream with adequate clearance from a parking lane, or are on a shared road where they interact with only occasional motor vehicles (as opposed to a stream of traffic) with a low speed differential. Where a bike lane lies between a through lane and a right-turn lane, it is configured to give cyclists unambiguous priority where cars cross the bike lane and to keep car speed in the right-turn lane comparable to bicycling speeds. Crossings are not difficult for most adults.

L TS 3
More traffic stress than LTS 2, yet markedly less than the stress of integrating with multilane traffic, and therefore welcome to many people currently riding bikes in American cities. Offering cyclists either an exclusive riding zone (lane) next to moderate-speed traffic or shared lanes on streets that are not multilane and have moderately low speed. Crossings may be longer or across higher-speed roads than allowed by LTS 2, but are still considered acceptably safe to most adult pedestrians.

LTS 4 A level of stress beyond LTS 3.

EXISTING ROADWA Y NETWORK LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS
Using the criteria described in the above section, a level of traffic stress (LTS) value was assigned to every segment of the City of Lincoln’s existing roadway network. Segments were generally defined as sections of roadway that are between controlled intersections or changes in roadway characteristics (such as the transition from two to three lanes, or changes in speed limits). Segments vary by length depending on the roadway function and characteristic. Additionally, intersection approaches were treated as distinct segments for analysis due.

The City of Lincoln’s existing roadway network level of traffic stress is presented on Figure 5. There is a large proportion of low-stress facilities within the city due to the fact that the majority of the city’s road-miles are residential streets with speed limits of 25 miles per hour or less. While these streets generally do not have bicycle facilities, they are considered low stress routes due to the low vehicular speed and low volumes. 139

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
27 Figure 5 — Existing Level of Traffic Stress

NOT TO SCALE

Level of Traﬃc Stress
Low Stress (LTS 1) - all user types and ages, including children LEGEND
Roads
Medium-High Stress (LTS 3) - enthused and conﬁdent users Moderate Stress (LTS 2) - interested but concerned users High Stress (LTS 4) - strong and fearless users
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Nelson LnNelson Ln
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY
140

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
28 It is important to note that roadways with existing bicycle facilities or with low speed limits are not necessarily considered low-stress. For example, Ferrari Ranch Road has Class II bike lane facilities, but it is considered high-stress between Caledon Circle and Del Webb Boulevard, primarily due to its speed limit of 40 miles per hour and the lack of additional bicycle safety buffers. Also, while 5th Street is considered low-stress along the majority of its extents due to its low speed limit, the route is intersected by Joiner Parkway in the west and Lincoln Boulevard in the east. Given the lack of bicycle pockets at these intersection approaches, cyclists are forced to maneuver between through and right-turn vehicular movements, creating a high-stress condition at this juncture. Other factors, such as the presence of on-street parking, can affect the LTS score.

The following Table 8 shows the distribution of segment miles by level of traffic stress. Given the extent of residential streets, 85-percent of the City’s road system is classified low-stress. Conversely, 15-percent is classified as medium to high- stress (wide, higher speed, arterials). Class I bike paths do not receive an LTS score; however, they provide the lowest stress experience for cyclists due to the complete separation from motor vehicles.

Table 8 – Segment Miles by Level of Traffic Stress
LTS Length (Miles) Percentage
1 – Low 431 78%
2 – Low-Moderate 39 7%
3 – Medium-High 18 3%
4 – High 66 12%
Total 554 100%

EXISTING NETWORK CONNECTIVITY
While most the City of Lincoln’s roadway network is low stress, the City of Lincoln faces many challenges to intra-city connectivity. The city is divided by natural and physical barriers that preclude bicycle connectivity, including Auburn Ravine just south of 1st Street, and by Highway 65 just west of E Joiner Parkway. Additionally, high-stress roadways act as barriers to mobility and gaps of connectivity. As shown in Figure 6, connectivity gaps are caused by medium to high stress routes along the following roadways, among others:
» E. Joiner Parkway
» Lincoln Bouelvard
» Ferrari Ranch Road
» McBean Park Drive
» Twelve Bridges Drive
Additionally, the City of Lincoln’s downtown area is considered a medium to high stress area, due primarily to the presence of on-street parking and lack of adequate bicycle markings at intersections.

As a result, intra-city connectivity is limited to “islands” (or pockets) of low-stress network, dramatically reducing the number and length of potential connected trips within the city. Figure 7 presents the low stress connectivity matrix, where the key locations within the City are connected by low stress routes. These key locations include neighborhoods, schools, shopping centers, and governmental offices, among others, totaling 100 locations, or “key-nodes” , serving as primary origins and destinations for bicycle travel within the city. A connectivity evaluation was conducted for each location pair to determine how well each point is served by the low stress network. 141

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
29 NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
Roads
High Stress Barrier/Gap
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Nelson LnNelson Ln
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY
Figure 6 — Barriers and Gaps
142

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
30 Figure 7 — Network Connectivity
143

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
31 As shown on Figure 7, each blue line represents a positive connection between keynodes. The isolated webs demonstrate the lack of existing city-wide low stress connectivity, and provides insight on which new connections would provide the greatest benefit for enhancing mobility through connected neighborhoods. In addition, as shown, some key- nodes are completely disconnected to the rest of the network, due to being separated by a moderate to high stress route. (Note: Class I bicycle facilities are included as low stress bicycle connections.) Figure 6 and Figure 7 show that even with an abundance of low-stress routes (i.e., islands of connectivity), the existing low- stress network does not adequately provide for true connectivity between key locations or areas within the City.

EXISTING NETWORK UNDUE DETOUR
Bicycle trip lengths are an important consideration when evaluating bicycle network connectivity. Behavioral research by the Mineta Institute suggests that physical or high-stress impedances that necessitate longer more circuitous bicycle routing can diminish the desire to bike at all. This is called “undue detour” and it can occur when re-routing to maintain a low-stress bicycling experience is significantly greater than the shortest or quickest route. Hence, measuring bicycle trip length is critical to determining network connectivity for the following reasons:
» While key-nodes may be physically connected by the network, high-stress barriers and gaps within the network can substantially increase bicycle trip distances.
» Per research by the Mineta Institute, circuitous routing of greater than 25% of the baseline distance is considered “undue detour” , and could impede bicycle travel.
» Additionally, high-stress barriers and gaps can completely separate key-nodes from the surrounding network, making it difficult and unsafe to travel by bicycle.

The following network connectivity assessments were performed to quantify bicycle trip distance between key-nodes throughout the City.

Baseline Network Trip Length
The baseline network reflects the full roadway and bicycle network regardless of stress level. The resulting bicycle trip distances between all key-node locations provides the “shortest path” bicycle connectivity network. This assumes the ideal condition in which the entire roadway network is considered appropriate for all user types.

Low Stress Network Trip Length
The low-stress network analysis reflects the shortest path between key-node locations using only the low-stress roadway network (LTS-1 and LTS-2), including Class I bike paths. In effect, all high-stress routes (LTS-3 and LTS-4) are considered barriers to bicycle travel, and are removed from the network.

The comparative performance of these two networks are shown in Table 9. As shown, increased trip lengths required to maintain a low-stress bicycling experience adds a total of 48 miles to cyclist travel between key locations within the City. Additionally, detours to maintain a low-stress bicycling experience that result in 25% or more increase in trip length relative to the shortest route (i.e., undue detour) adds 37 miles. Similarly, an 89.2% reduction in overall connectivity between key-nodes occurs when removing the high-stress network from consideration (i.e. 87.6% of trips between key- nodes cannot be made without accessing the high-stress network, and 0.6% of trip lengths between key-nodes increases bicycling distance by 25% or greater, within the low stress network).

To account for potentially unreasonable bicycle trip lengths, the same analysis was applied to trip lengths of two miles or less (to represent common trip types and purposes). As shown in Table 10, the removal of medium to high stress routes 144

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
32 from the network resulted in an approximately 67.4% reduction in connectivity between key-nodes (i.e. approximately

65.2% of trips between key-nodes are no longer possible, and 2.2% of trip lengths between key-nodes increase by 25% or greater). The increase in trip lengths for trips of two miles or less adds approximately 45 miles of detour to cyclist travel between key locations within the city. Additionally, approximately 37 miles of total detour is considered “undue detour” , and is attributable to trip lengths that increase by 25% or more.

Table 9 – Trip Length and Detour
CONNECTION/DETOUR % OF TOTAL

POSSIBLE TRIPS

ADDED DISTANCE
(FEET)

ADDED DISTANCE
(MILES)
Undue Detour (> 25%) 0.6% 194,040 37
Detour (< 25 %) 1.0% 55,664 11
Completely Disconnected** 87.6% - -
Detour Total 89.2% 249,704 48
No Base Connection* 1.0% - -
No Change 9.8% - -
Grand Total 100.0% 249,704 48
*Includes key-nodes that are not connected to network under base conditions **100% disconnection = completely disconnected from network Table 10 – Trip Length and Detour (Trip Lengths of 2 Miles or Less) CONNECTION/DETOUR % OF TOTAL

POSSIBLE TRIPS

ADDED DISTANCE
(FEET)

ADDED DISTANCE
(MILES)
Undue Detour (> 25%) 2.2% 194,040 37
Detour (< 25 %) 2.9% 40,792 8
Completely Disconnected** 65.2% - -
Detour Total 70.3% 234,832 45
No Base Connection* 3.5% - -
No Change 26.2% - -
Grand Total 100.0% 234,832 45
*Includes keynodes that are not connected to network under base conditions **100% disconnection = completely disconnected from network

145

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
33 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Community participation is a vital component of this plan for obtaining input on existing bicycling facilities, potential roadways for improvement to accommodate bicycles, and the type of support facilities or programs needed to improve bicycling within the City of Lincoln. The development of the 2018 Bicycle Transportation Plan was informed through a combination of technical analyses and input received from the public and stakeholders. The public outreach approach of this plan included both traditional approaches to soliciting public input such as public workshops as well as non- traditional on-line engagement methods. The following key outreach tasks were performed which are described in greater detail below.
» Two public workshops – one at the
beginning of the study and one at
the conclusion;
» Circulation of project information
cards to schools and the public;
» Development of a stakeholder and
public contact list;
» Periodic eBlasts to inform the
public and stakeholders of
upcoming project related events
and/or information on how to
provide input;
» Development and upkeep of a
project specific website;
» Access to on-line survey on the
project website; and,
» Development of an interactive
web-based tool for soliciting
geo-referenced comments and
suggestions from the public.

PUBLIC WORKSHOPS
Two public workshops were held to solicit input on the development of the 2018 Bicycle Transportation Plan and to receive feedback on the plan recommendations. These are described below.

Workshop #1: The key focus of this workshop was to solicit input from the public regarding issues and opportunities for improving the City’s bicycle network. Input was received using interactive polling combined with dialogue. The workshop provided core bicycle network planning concepts, facility types, and selected analysis approaches along with initial findings regarding collision history, existing bicycle infrastructure, and an introduction to level of stress analysis criteria. The public outreach process and resources were described to inform the public how they could stay engaged in the process which included access to on-line materials, the on-line survey, and the on-line interactive web-based tool for providing input continuously throughout the study. The public outreach process itself was also described and how the public’s input was going to be used to inform the development of the plan’s recommendations (see Appendix B) Workshop #2: The focus of this workshop was to present the draft study, its’ findings, and its’ recommendations.

Feedback was solicited from the public on the proposed CIP list and the top ten improvement recommendations. All feedback received was recorded and reported back to the City Council for its consideration during approval of the study.

Project Information Card
A project information card was developed which included information on how to access the on-line engagement resources developed for the plan (i.e., project website and interactive web-based tool for public input). These cards were circulated at public workshops, to city schools, to stakeholders and the public. These cards were also available at the City offices.

Public and Stakeholder Contact List
A project contact list was developed at the onset of the study which served as a mailing list for informational eBlasts related to the 2018 Bicycle Transportation Plan development. This list was open to all interested parties and consisted of key stakeholders such as heads of school districts, the Bureau of Industrial Affairs (BIA), bicycle advocacy groups/clubs and interested members of the public.
146

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
34 ON-LINE ENGAGEMENT
The following non-traditional outreach strategies were utilized in this plan. eBlasts
Periodic eBlasts were sent to the contact list to inform the public and stakeholders of upcoming project related events and/or information on how to provide input. Announcements were also posted on the project website (see below) and the City of Lincoln’s website.

Project Specific Website
Planning information was shared continuously throughout the study through the development of a project specific website at www.lincolnbikewayplan.com. The website provided an overview of the plan’s purpose, background document resources, information on upcoming events and workshops, on-line survey, and access to the interactive web-based tool link for providing geo-referenced comments and inputs to identify needs or improvements. The webpage was advertised throughout the City through the distribution of informational project cards, workshops, and periodic stakeholder and contact list eBlasts. Additionally, the website provided a set of frequently asked questions and responses to those questions (these are provided in Appendix B): The website remained available for public comment for two months following the first Public Workshop.

Interactive Web-based T ool
In support of the public outreach effort, an interactive web-based tool was developed that allowed the public to use a map-based spatial tool to comment on and/or make suggestions on improvements or deficiencies related to specific geographical locations. Users could view the study area, zoom into areas of particular interest, add comments and recommendations with a simple click and comment feature, and leave general comments about the project. The comments received were compiled and summarized for assisting in the identification of issues, projects, and priorities to incorporate into the plan. This interactive web-based tool proved to be a key source of public input. Figure 8 shows
the concentration of public comments received on the interactive web-based tool. Appendix C provides a summary of public comments/suggestions.

SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT
The public input received through the various outreach mediums during the development of the 2018 Bicycle Transportation Plan was summarized by geographic location to assist in the identification of needs and bicycle improvements to address those needs. This geographic summary reflects those locations or needs that received the most public comments (i.e., were repeatedly raised by the public). This summary is provided below. » East Avenue is a primary route into and out of the City, yet it lacks clearly marked centerlines, parking spaces, and is poorly maintained, making it unsafe for cyclists. East Avenue should have clearly marked bike lanes and sidewalks. » Crossing the intersection of Lincoln Boulevard at Ferrari Ranch Road is difficult and unsafe, especially due to the presence of the railroad tracks.
» The intersection of Hwy 193 at Ferrari Ranch Road is hazardous for cyclists, especially for those traveling west on Hwy 193 turning left onto Ferrari Ranch Road.
» There needs to be a connection on both sides of Moore Road, under Hwy 65. » Lincoln Boulevard needs bike lanes and sidewalk.
» East Joiner Parkway south of Twelve Bridges Drive needs bike lanes and sidewalk, with crossing for students at the future high school and existing middle school.
147

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
35 NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
Roads
Comment Concentra�on
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Sunset Blvd W
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Nelson LnNelson Ln
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY
Figure 8 — Public Comments
148

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
36 2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
This page left intentionally blank. 149

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
37 PROPOSED SYSTEM
This section describes the proposed system of bikeways developed for the City of Lincoln. The proposed bikeway system was informed by:
» Level of traffic stress and connectivity analysis results; » Historical collision data; and,
» Public input.

Recommendations were developed in coordination with the City of Lincoln. Overall, the proposed bikeway system aims to close gaps in the bicycle network including those created by the high-stress network routes. This proposed bikeway system provides the comprehensive project list for the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). From this CIP list, ten projects were identified for further review and design considerations in an effort to inform the City’s prospective grant funding applications.

PLANNED BIKEWA Y PROJECTS
The City currently has several bikeway projects planned, including the following.

Lincoln Boulevard Improvements Project
Former Highway 65 in Lincoln, now Lincoln Boulevard, has been relinquished to the City of Lincoln. The Lincoln Boulevard Improvements Projects will focus on the segment from just south of Sterling Parkway to just north of 7th Street. The overall goal of the Lincoln Boulevard project is to provide for a more pedestrian, bicycle, and Nieghborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) friendly environment along the main street through the city. In order to address funding constraints, the improvements will be constructed in phases as described below.

Lincoln Boulevard Phase 1 - 7th Street to McBean Park Drive (Project Completed October 2015)
This project proivde improvements to Lincoln Blvd. from 250 feet north of 7th Street to McBean Park Drive. Improvements included transition onto the cross-streets at 5th Street, 6th Street, and 7th Street. The project included the following elements:
» Curb returns with bulb-outs to shorten the pedestrian path, enhanced crosswalks, and sidewalks with terra cotta bands.
» Street trees with an irrigation system that includes capacity for expansion for future shrub planting. » Site furnishings to include bike racks, benches, and trash receptacles. » Decorative street lights.
» Replacement of damaged and non-conforming sidewalks including ADA compliant pedestrian ramps. » Class 2 bike/NEV access along the project corridor.

Lincoln Boulevard Phase 2 – 1st Street to McBean Park Drive The project will provide improvements to a quarter-mile stretch of Lincoln Boulevard from 2nd Street to McBean Park Drive (this stretch includes three different intersections). Improvements will be similar as those listed in Phase 1 – 7th Street to McBean Park Drive. Construction contract April 2018 – November 2018. 150

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
38 Lincoln Boulevard HSIP – Signal Modification and Upgrades (Included with Phase 2 Project)
The project consists of lighting and equipment upgrades to five traffic signals and systemic traffic signal timing improvements to a total of 11 traffic signals along Lincoln Boulevard from Sterling Parkway to 7th Street including the addition of Class II NEV/Bike lanes from Sterling Parkway to 1st Street. Construction contract April 2018 – November 2018.

Lincoln Boulevard Phase 3 – Pedestrian Railroad Crossing Upgrades This project will provide pedestrian crossing improvements of the railroad tracks to the side streets adjacent to a half mile stretch of Lincoln Boulevard. The side streets include 1st Street, 3rd Street, 5th Street, 6th Street, and 7th Street. The total combined project length is approximately 0.6 miles of improved sidewalks and approximately 0.3 miles of NEV/Bike Lanes. The overall goal of this project is to provide for a more pedestrian, bicycle, and Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEV) friendly environment along the main street through the city. This will be accomplished by implementing the use of shortened pedestrian crossings (i.e. bulbouts), ADA compliant pedestrian ramps, upgraded pedestrian crossings of the railroad tracks, and bike access along the side streets. NEV lanes will be included along several of the side streets for consistency with the City’s NEV Circulation Plan.

Lincoln Boulevard – Ferrari Ranch Road to 1st Street and Auburn Ravine Bridge This Lincoln Boulevard project would expand the roadway to three lanes with landscaped median, including Class II bike/ NEV lanes and wider sidewalks. According to project site plans, the Class II bike/NEV lanes would range from 7 to 10-feet, and bike/NEV pockets would be provided at intersections with right turn pockets.

McBean Park Drive Bridge Replacement
This project includes the replacement of the McBean Park Drive bridge over the Auburn Ravine, and improvement of the roadways approaches on McBean Park Drive. The bridge will be widened to accommodate Class II bike/golf cart lanes, and sidewalks for pedestrians.

Additional information on these planned projects is included in Appendix E. 151

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
39 PROPOSED SYSTEM OF BIKEWA YS
In addition, the previous Bicycle Transportation Plan (2012) identified bicycle improvements for the City of Lincoln (Appendix H). Improvements included an extensive network of Class I bike paths providing connections to areas of future development, and Class II facilities on planned roads. This 2018 plan update assumes the full list of improvements presented in the previous plan, specifically those that fulfill future development needs. The 2018 BTP CIP identifies improvements to be added to, or prioritized within, the existing Capitol Improvement Program (CIP) list.

Table 11 shows the proposed intersection improvements to be included in the City’s CIP . Table 12 shows the proposed bikeway improvements to be included in the City’s CIP . It includes a total of 38.6 miles of new bicycle routes (Class I, Class II, Class III, and Class IV-Lite). The existing and proposed bikeway system for the 2018 BTP is shown in Figure 9, and includes bikeway projects planned by Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA). Bikeway improvement concepts for Specific Plan areas are provided in Appendix D.

Table 11 – Capital Improvement Program: Intersection Bicycle Improvements

ID LOCATION LOCATION TYPE
I-001 East Avenue 9th Street and 7th Street Crossing
I-002 Joiner Pkwy Finney Way Crossing
I-003 Nicolaus Road Class I trail/Teal Hollow Drive S Crossing/Connection I-004 Groveland Lane Joiner Pkwy Crossing/Connection
I-005 Ferrari Ranch Road at Class I Trail Connection
I-006 E. Joiner Pkwy at Twelve Bridges Middle School Crossing/Connection I-007 East Avenue 12th Street Bicycle Protection
I-008 McBean Park Drive East Avenue Bicycle Protection
I-009 7th Street J Street Bicycle Protection
I-010 O Street 3rd Street Bicycle Protection
I-011 Ferrari Ranch Road Ingram Pkwy; Sun City Blvd Bicycle Protection I-012* Ferrari Ranch Road SR-193/McBean Park Drive Bicycle Protection I-013 Lincoln Blvd 1st Street; 3rd Street; McBean Park Drive; 5th Street; 6th Street; 7th Street Bicycle Protection
I-014 Lincoln Blvd Gateway Drive Bicycle Protection
I-015 Lincoln Blvd Ferrari Ranch Road Bicycle Protection I-016 Ferrari Ranch Road E. Joiner Pkwy Bicycle Protection I-017 E. Joiner Pkwy
Sterling Pkwy; Groveland Ln; Danbury Dr/
Downing Cir; Moore Road; 1st Street; 3rd Street;
5th Street; Nicolaus Road
Bicycle Protection
I-018 Ferrari Ranch Road Sorento Pkwy Bicycle Protection I-019 E. Joiner Pkwy Bella Breeze Drive (N and S) Bicycle Protection I-020 E. Joiner Pkwy Twelve Bridges Drive Bicycle Protection I-021 Twelve Bridges Drive Parkside Drive/Southcreek Drive Bicycle Protection I-022 Twelve Bridges Drive Eastridge Drive Bicycle Protection *To be fully or partially funded with developed fees or as a condition of approval of new development 152

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
40 Table 12 – Capital Improvement Program: Bikeway Improvements

ID LOCATION BOUNDARY TYPE LENGTH
B-001 East Avenue 9th St to McBean Park Dr Class I and Class II 6,300 B-002* East Avenue 12th Street to 9th Street Class II 2,803 B-003 McBean Park Drive Lincoln Blvd to Ferrari Ranch Rd Class II 6,992 B-004 Lincoln Blvd (Downtown) 1st St to 7th St Bike Route (Class III) 5,761 B-005* Lincoln Blvd 1st St to Sterling Pkwy Class II (Shared NEV) 12,661 B-006 Lincoln Blvd Sterling Pkwy to City Limit Class II 9,755 B-007 Ferrari Ranch Road Lincoln Blvd to Caledon Cir Class IV-Lite 14,039 B-008 Ferrari Ranch Road Caledon Cir to Caledon Cir Class II 5,146 B-009 Moore Road Class I east of E. Joiner Pkwy to Class I highway crossing Class II 7,241
B-010 H Street 1st Street to 7th Street Class II 8,469
B-011 SR-65 Crossing Moore Rd west and east of highway Class I 643 B-012 Auburn Ravine Crossing Moore Rd east of highway to Chambers Dr Class I 1,000 B-013 Chambers Drive Class I at Moore Road and Nicolaus Rd Bike Route (Class III) 5,264 B-014 Chambers Drive Chambers Dr to Waverly Dr/Nicolaus Rd Class I 3,901 B-015 1st Street Douglas Dr to Joiner Pkwy Class IV-Lite 4,568 B-016 1st Street Joiner Pkwy to R Street Class II 3,296 B-017** 1st Street R Street to Lincoln Blvd Class II 8,399 B-018 Nicolaus Road Joiner Pkwy to O St Class II 5,625
B-019 Twelve Bridges Drive Industrial Ave to Eastridge Dr Class IV-Lite 22,156 B-020 E. Joiner Pkwy Twelve Bridges Dr to north of Ranch View Dr Class IV-Lite 11,440 B-021 3rd Street Joiner Pkwy to D St Bike Route (Class III) 13,780 B-022 5th Street Joiner Pkwy to East Ave Class II 16,522 B-023 J Street 1st St to 7th St Bike Route (Class III) 5,761 B-024 7th Street O St to East Ave Class II 9,498
B-025 F Street 3rd St to 5th St Bike Route (Class III) 1,977 B-026 E Street 1st St to 7th St Class II 5,748
B-027 E Street (Future) Ferrari Ranch Rd to 1st Street (Extension) Class II 3,477 B-028 Class I under E. Joiner Pkwy E. Joiner Pkwy Class I 324 B-029 Class I near McBean Park Dr and
Ferrari Ranch Rd McBean Park Dr at Ferrari Ranch Rd Class I 261 B-030 Class I near E. Joiner Pkwy and
Twelve Bridges MS Twelve Bridges Middle School Class I 780 B-031 Class I (Future Development) Ferrari Ranch Rd at Caledon Cir Class I 448.7 B-032 Virginiatown Rd and
McCourtney Rd East Avenue to City Limits Class II 780
*To be fully or partially funded with developed fees or as a condition of approval of new development **Currently planned by the City of Lincoln Total Length 204,035 (38.6 mi)
153

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
41 Figure 9 — Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities

NOT TO SCALE
LEGEND
Roads
Bicycle Facili�es
Exis�ng Class I
Exis�ng Class II
Exis�ng Class II (NEV)
Golf Cart Path
Bicycle Parking Facility
Parks/Recrea�on
Speciﬁc Plan Area
(See Appendix for
proposed bike network)
P
Future Approved Class I*
Future Approved Class II*
Proposed Facili�es
Proposed Class I
Proposed Class II
(Dashed = Restripe)
Proposed Class IV-Lite
Proposed Class III Bike Route
Intersec�on Improvement
Bikeway Connec�on
at grade
Bikeway Connec�on Non-at grade
*Includes Placer County (PCTPA) projects
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
O St
East Ave
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Athens Ave
Industrial Blvd
Foothills BlvdFiddyment Rd
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
City of LincolnCity of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY
Nelson LnNelson Ln
Village 1
Specific Plan Area
Village 1
Specific Plan Area
Village 7
Specific Plan
Area
Village 7
Specific Plan
Area
154

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
42 TOP TEN BIKEWA Y IMPROVEMENTS
The system of proposed bikeway improvements creates a continuous low-stress network that connects residential areas with majority activity centers in the City of Lincoln, provides low-stress connections for anticipated development in the City Sphere of Influence, and includes regional low-stress connections to communities east and south of the City.

Of the proposed bikeway improvements listed above, ten projects were identified as priority projects for the City. Table 13 show the City’s Top 10 bikeway improvement projects, as shown on Figure 10. The Top 10 projects include a total of

8.2 miles of new bicycle facilities (Class I, Class II, and Class IV-Lite). The Top 10 projects are discussed in more detail on the following pages. Cost estimates and initial design recommendations are provided in Appendix F.

Table 13 –Top 10 Bikeway Improvements
CIP: TOP 10 BIKEWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
TOP
10 ID LOCATION BOUNDARY TYPE LENGTH
(FEET)
1 B-001 East Avenue 9th St to McBean Park Dr Class I and Class II 6,300 2 B-011 SR-65 Crossing Moore Rd west and east of highway Class I Crossing 643 3 B-015 1st Street Douglas Dr to Joiner Pkwy Class IV-Lite 4,568 4 B-016 1st Street Joiner Pkwy to R Street Class II 3,296 5 B-020 E. Joiner Pkwy Twelve Bridges Dr to north of Ranch View Dr Class IV-Lite 11,440 6 B-022 5th Street Joiner Pkwy to East Ave Class II 16,522 7 B-028 Class I under E.

Joiner Pkwy E. Joiner Pkwy Class I 324
8 I-013 Lincoln Blvd 1st Street; 3rd Street; McBean Park Drive; 5th Street; 6th Street; 7th Street
Bicycle Protection
at Intersections -
9 I-015 Lincoln Blvd Ferrari Ranch Road Bicycle Protection at Intersections -
10 I-017 E. Joiner Pkwy
Sterling Pkwy; Groveland Ln; Danbury Dr/Downing
Cir; Moore Road; 1st Street; 3rd Street; 5th Street;
Nicolaus Road
Bicycle Protection
at Intersections -
Total Length (Feet) 43,093
Total Length (Miles) 8.2
155

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
43 Figure 10 — T op T en Bikeway Improvement Projects

NOT TO SCALE
B-001
B-011
B-015 B-016
B-020
B-022
B-028
I-013
I-015
I-017
B-001
B-011
B-015 B-016
B-020
B-022
B-028
I-013
I-015
I-017
LEGEND
Roads
Proposed Facili�es
Proposed Class I
Proposed Class II
(Dashed = Restripe)
Proposed Class IV-Lite
Intersec�on Improvement
Bikeway Connec�on at grade
Bikeway Connec�on Not-at grade
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Industrial Blvd
Fiddyment Rd
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
Wildcat Blvd
Moore Rd
Sorrento Pkwy
Caledon Circle
Venture Dr
Avia�on Blvd
M
cCourtney Rd
Virginiatown Rd
Ingram Pkwy
Sun City Blvd
Whitney Ranch Pkwy
Stanford Ranch Rd
Sunset Blvd
Industrial Blvd
Fiddyment Rd
Silva Valley Pkwy
Stoneridge Blvd
Lincoln Blvd
E Joiner Pkwy
Ferrari Ranch Rd
1st St
3rd St
5th St
Nicolaus Rd
Lincoln Blvd
Lincoln Newcastle Hwy
Del Webb Blvd
Twelve Bridges Dr
O St
East Ave
J St H St
E St
7th St
9th St
Wise Rd
Sierra College Blvd
Moore Rd
Twelve Bridges Dr
City of Lincoln

PLACER COUNTYPLACER COUNTY
Nelson LnNelson Ln
156

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
44 This section outlines the Top Ten Bikeway Improvements included in the City’s recommended CIP list. These projects represent those improvements that will provide the most benefit for the City in terms of increasing safety and connectivity of bicycle travel for all user types.

1. B-001: East Avenue Class I and Class II Bike Lanes
This project includes Class II bike lanes on East Avenue from 9th Street to McBean Park Drive. In addition, Class I facilities currently exist along East Avenue from 12th Street to 9th Street, and from 6th Street to McBean Park Drive. This project would construct Class I facilities from 9th Street to 6th Street, and improve crossings at side streets from 6th Street to McBean Park Drive. Class II bike lanes between 9th Street to 12th Street are planned, and will be fullly or partially funded by development fees or as a condition of approval of new development.

East Avenue is currently considered a high stress route due to the disconnected or lack of bicycle facilities along a roadway with moderate speeds. With these improvements, it would be considered a low stress route. In addition, these facilities will provide a safe and continuous bicycle route to Carlin C. Coppin Elementary School on 12th Street.

2. B-011: SR-65 Class I Crossing
This project includes a Class I bicycle and pedestrian path under SR-65 connecting Moore Road west and east of the highway. This project would provide additional connectivity for neighborhoods west and east of the highway, and provide opportunity to connect to future development west of the City.

3. B-015: 1st Street Class IV-Lite
This project includes Class IV-Lite bike lanes on 1st Street from Joiner Parkway to Douglas Drive/Chambers Drive. Class IV- Lite bike lanes are recommended to provide safe bicycle access to the Creekside Oaks Elementary School and the City of Lincoln Parks and Recreation office. This project assumes improvements to the intersection of Joiner Parkway at 1st Street (Project #I-017), ensuring safe bicycle crossing of Joiner Parkway. Restriping of Class II bike lanes is proposed on 1st Street east of Joiner Parkway (Project #B-015).
1st Street at Joiner Parkway is currently considered a high stress route due to the lack of bicycle facilities at the drop-off/ pick-up area for an elementary school. Additionally, the intersection approach at Joiner Parkway lacks bicycle pockets in the presence of a right-turn pocket. With this improvement, it would be considered a low stress route.

4. B-016: 1st Street Class II
This project includes restriping of Class II bike lanes on 1st Street from Joiner Parkway to R Street. Class II facilities are planned on 1st Street from R Street to Lincoln Boulevard (Project #B-017). 1st Street at Joiner Parkway, and east to R Street, is considered a high stress route due to the presence of faded Class II bike lanes adjacent to on-street parking. Given that it provides access to several schools (First Street School and Glen Edwards Middle School), the Class II bike lanes provide a false sense of safety for cyclists. With this improvement, it would be considered a low stress route.

5. B-020: E. Joiner Parkway Class IV-Lite
This project includes Class IV-Lite bike lanes on E. Joiner Parkway from Twelve Bridges Drive to north of Ranch View Drive at the Lincoln/Rocklin city limits..

E. Joiner Parkway is currently a high stress route near Twelve Bridges Middle School and the public library. A high school is planned in the vicinity west of E. Joiner Parkway. Class IV-Lite bike lanes are recommended to provide safe bicycle access to these locations. In addition, E. Joiner Parkway provides connectivity to the City of Rocklin. 157

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
45 6. B-022: 5th Street Class II/Class III
This project includes Class II bike lanes on 5th Street from Joiner Parkway to East Avenue. Due to existing diagonal parking on segments of 5th Street, Class III signage and markings are recommended between I Street and D Street where a Class II bike lane is not feasible. This project complements improvements to the intersection of Lincoln Boulevard at 5th Street (#I-013).

This project would provide safe connectivity for cross-town travel east and west of Lincoln Boulevard from Joiner Parkway to East Avenue. Diagonal parking exists on both 3rd Street and 6th Street near Lincoln Boulevard. In addition, 6th Street and 7th Street do not directly connect to Joiner Parkway. As such, 5th Street is the most viable option for cross-town connectivity between Joiner Parkway and East Avenue. While Class II bike lanes are recommended on 1st Street, cyclists are not expected to divert a cross-town trip to 1st Street if it does not fit their natural path.

7. B-028: Class I Connection under Joiner Parkway
This project includes a Class I connection under Joiner Parkway, between existing Class I bike paths. This connection would provide an alternative, low stress route to Ferrari Ranch Road connecting neighborhoods west and east of the highway, and west and east of Joiner Parkway. While a Class IV-Lite route is recommended on Ferrari Ranch Road in the City’s 2018 BTP CIP , providing off-street bikeway connections would further reduce cyclists’ exposure to motor vehicles.

8. I-013: Intersection Improvements on Lincoln Boulevard (Downtown) This project includes improvements to intersection approaches on Lincoln Boulevard between 1st Street and 7th Street., and corresponding side streets. Intersection improvements include pavement markings, bike pockets, bike pocket extensions, and adequate signage, where appropriate.

The Lincoln Boulevard Improvement Project Phase I added bicyclist and pedestrian improvements along the Downtown Lincoln corridor from 7th Street to McBean Park Drive, and Phase 2 would extend these improvements to 1st Street. However, the majority of these improvements addressed through travel on Lincoln Boulevard, without significant improvements to side street approaches. Project #I-013 recommends improving these side street approaches by adding bike pockets or extending bike pockets. In addition, intersection treatments such as green paint and pavement markings would increase visibility in these high conflict areas. Priority for these intersection improvements is on 1st Street and 5th Street, as they correspond to 2018 BTP CIP cross-town improvement recommendations (#B-017 and #B-022).

9. I-015: Intersection Improvement at Lincoln Boulevard and Ferrari Ranch Road This project includes improvements to intersection approaches at the intersection of Lincoln Boulevard and Ferrari Ranch Road. Intersection improvements include pavement markings, bike pockets, bike pocket extensions, and adequate signage, where appropriate.

The Lincoln Boulevard Improvement Project presents plans for improvements to Lincoln Boulevard from Ferrari Ranch Road to 1st Street, in concurrence with the widening of Lincoln Boulevard to three lanes south of Ferrari Ranch Road.

Improvements at this intersection include Class II bike/NEV lanes and intersection pockets on Lincoln Boulevard. Project #I-015 recommends improving the Ferrari Ranch side street approaches by adding a bike pocket on the eastbound approach, and extending the bike pocket with dashed markings on the westbound approach. In addition, intersection treatments such as green paint and pavement markings would increase visibility in this high conflict area.

10. I-017: Intersection Improvement Joiner Parkway (Sterling Parkway to Nicolaus Road) This project includes improvements to intersection approaches to interesctions on Joiner Parkway between Sterling Parkway and Nicolaus Road. While this segment has existing Class II bike lanes, current intersection configurations present high conflict areas for cyclists. Intersection improvements include pavement markings (green paint), bike pockets, bike pocket extensions, signal detection, and adequate signage, where appropriate. 158

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
46 PROPOSED SYSTEM LOW-STRESS CONNECTIVITY COMPARISON
The existing bikeway network, the 2012 BTP CIP , the recommended 2018 BTP CIP , and the Top Ten CIP list of bikeway improvements were evaluated using the network summary statistic “Percent Nodes Connected” . Utilizing the network connectivity methodology described in previous sections, the degree of low-stress network connectivity that is achieved by these respective CIP lists can be determined. In this context, connectivity of key-nodes is based solely on the low-stress network. The percentage of key-nodes connected excludes trips between key-nodes that increase by 25% or greater in length above baseline conditions, are completely disconnected from each other, or are not currently connected under baseline conditions. The percentage of key-nodes connected represents the proportion of locations within the City that remain connected by low stress routes, and the distance between the locations does not increase by more than 25% above baseline conditions. The “Percent Nodes Connected” results of these network analyses are presented in Table 14.

As shown above, the 2012 BTP CIP provides minimal improvements to the City’s bicycle network connectivity, with approximately 89% of the City’s key locations remaining disconnected from each other. This is due, primarily, to the lack of additional safety measures to reduce roadway traffic stress levels along Class II bicycle routes (i.e., many Class II improvements identified in the 2012 BTP CIP did not improve roadway conditions to achieve low-stress status). In contrast, the 2018 BTP CIP significantly improves bicycle network connectivity due to improvements that provide greater separation between cyclists and the outside travel lane, including buffered bike lanes, intersection treatments, and visibility enhancements that reduce roadway traffic stress levels.

Comparing the “Percent Nodes Connected” results between the 2018 BTP CIP and the Top Ten CIP list reveals that approximately 70% of the low-stress connectivity benefit of the entire 2018 BTP CIP will be achieved by implementing the Top Ten CIP list (46.2%/68.1% or 60.8%/86.3%). As described in the previous section, the Top Ten bikeway improvements were chosen to close gaps in the existing bicycle network. As shown in Figure 10, Class I bike path projects #B-011 and #B-028 provide connectivity between neighborhoods east and west of the highway. Class II bike lane projects #B-016 and #B-022 provide east-west connectivity through central Lincoln and the Downtown area. Projects #I-013, #I-015, and #I-017 provide improvements to intersections along key north-south routes within the City. Project #B-020 provides connectivity to southern Lincoln, as well as to areas south of the City limits. In addition, projects #B-001, #B-015, #B-016, and #B-020 provide safety improvements for routes near local elementary and middle schools. As a result, these ten improvements decrease roadway traffic stress significantly improving low-stress connectivity throughout the City.

Table 14 – Low-Stress Network Connectivity Comparison

ALL TRIPS (ALL LENGTHS) EXISTING LOW
STRESS NETWORK 2012 BTP CIP 2018 BTP CIP 2018 BTP TOP 10 % “Key Nodes” Connected 10.8% 11.3% 68.1% 46.2%

TRIPS OF 2 OR

LESS MILES

EXISTING LOW
STRESS NETWORK 2012 BTP CIP 2018 BTP CIP 2018 BTP TOP 10 % “Key Nodes” Connected 29.1% 29.4% 86.3% 60.8%
159

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
47 FUTURE BICYCLE RIDERSHIP
The number of potential new cyclists associated with the 2018 BTP CIP Top Ten projects was estimated using the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 552 methodology provided in the Guidelines for Analysis of Investment in Bicycle Facilities. The NCHRP 552 report provides national level research that suggest commute mode share can be used to extrapolate a more general mode share for bicycles using a best fit formula. In subsequent validation, the report suggests that the results of this analysis are typically within the 95% confidence interval, and when they are not, they provide a conservative estimate.

NCHRP 552 provides methodology and assumptions to measure and forecast the demand for bicycling based on population and employment data. The total number of new cyclists anticipated is based on the City of Lincoln’s Travel Demand Model land use file, which provides population and employment data per traffic analysis zones (TAZs) for the City of Lincoln for both existing and future year 2035 scenarios.

Using the traffic analysis zone structure and the associated 2035 land use data, the amount of population and employment expected to utilize the proposed bicycle facilities included in the 2018 Lincoln BTP CIP Top Ten project list was determined. Ridership estimates are calculated based on population and employment values within one and one- half mile of the proposed project. Other inputs such as bicycle mode share of commute trips (0.7%), and adult population percentage of the total population (77.1%), were based on American Community Survey (ACS) 2012-2016 5-year estimates for the City of Lincoln, to inform these estimates.

Applying the NCHRP 552 methodology to these improvements yields 90 new bicycle commuters under near term conditions, and 138 new commuters under future conditions. The NCHRP 552 analysis also generates three demand response estimates for recreation cyclists: low, moderate, and high. In this case, Class I facilities assumed the high estimate; Class II and Class IV-Lite facilities assumed the moderate estimate, and intersection improvements assumed the low estimate. Applying the NHCRP 552 methodology to these improvements yields 325 new recreation cyclists under near term conditions, and 458 new recreation cyclists under future conditions.

The total reduction in vehicle miles traveled was estimated using a 7.0-mile average roundtrip distance, based on approximate trip lengths within the City, as well as approximate trip lengths to neighboring employment centers within reasonable biking distances. Applying the average trip length by the number of new riders yields an approximate reduction of 1,287 vehicle miles traveled under future conditions. This is shown in Table 15. Bicycle ridership estimates, for each Top Ten bikeway improvement are presented in Appendix G.

Table 15 – Future Bicycle Ridership and Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduction for Top Ten Improvements

RECREATION BENEFIT PERSONS BICYCLE MILES TRAVELED VMT SAVED Total New Commuters 138 966 966
Total New Recreation Cyclists 458 3,206 321
Total New Cyclists 596 4,172 1,287
160

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
48 2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
This page left intentionally blank. 161

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
49 COST AND FUNDING ANAL YSIS

COST ESTIMATES
Table 18 contains a unit cost summary for constructing the proposed bicycle facilities. However, these cost estimates should be used only to develop generalized construction cost estimates and project prioritization. More detailed estimates can be developed after preliminary engineering.

Table 18 – Generalized Unit Cost Estimates for Bikeway Construction

FACILITY TYPE ESTIMATED COST PER MILE
Class III Bike Route $2,500
Class II Bike Lane (Two-Way) $50,675
Colored Bike Lane (Two-Way) $273,435
Class I Bike Path $1,392,763
Undercrossing $1,498,150
Class IV-Lite Buffer Bike Lane $78,638
Colored Buffered Bike Lane $210,638
Double Buffered Bike Lane $97,258
Colored Double Buffered Bike Lane $229,258

GRADE CROSSING CONSTRAINTS
The proposed system may have locations that entail special grade crossing considerations to avoid conflicts. These locations may occur where major roads intersect with Class I or Class II facilities, Class I paths intersect with Class II facilities, or streams and/or creeks are present. Examples include the Class I bike path interface with Joiner Parkway north of Moore Road, State Highway 65 north of Ferrari Ranch Road, and State Highway 193 east of East Avenue. All three locations will require special design considerations for crossing the ravine.

MONETIZING THE SOCIETAL BENEFITS OF BICYCLING
The benefits of increased bicycle activity include the reduction of vehicular traffic on city roadways. As discussed in the previous section, the City of Lincoln’s Top Ten bikeway improvements have the potential to save 1,287 of vehicle miles traveled. These savings result in a reduction in vehicular congestion and emissions, both of which are beneficial to the public. In addition, cycling, as a means of exercise and recreation, provides many public health benefits.

The abovementioned social benefits, among others, are monetized to estimate a benefit value to be compared against anticipated economic costs of bicycle facility infrastructure and maintenance. With an informed benefit value, decision makers are equipped with the information necessary to prioritize these improvements. 162

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
50 BENEFITS
Social benefit values are informed by research from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Minnesota Department of Transportation, and Midwest Regional University Transportation Center. Benefit values are based on the following assumptions.
» Existing cyclists near a new facility will shift from some other facility to the new one; and » The new facility will induce new cyclists.

The number of potential new cyclists as a result of a new bicycle facility is used to estimate a benefit value, based on associated economic values given to mobility, health, recreation, and vehicular reduction benefits. The total estimated benefits for these comprehensive improvements is $56,446,444 over twenty years.

COSTS
Cost estimates for the City of Lincoln’s Top Ten bicycle improvements are provided in Appendix F. The total estimated cost for these comprehensive improvements is $2,263,597 over twenty years, including operations and maintenance (O/M) costs.

BENEFIT-COST
Table 16 presents the monetized benefits, and the resulting benefit-cost ratio, associated with the City of Lincoln’s comprehensive list of Top Ten bicycle improvements over twenty years.

Table 16 – Top Ten Benefit-Cost

PROJECT
BASE FUTURE (20 Y ear)
Benefit/
Cost
(B-C)
Total Monetized Benefit Total Monetized Benefit
Base Annual
Benefit
20-Year
Future
Annual
Benefit
“20 Year
Total Benefit” Capital Cost 20-Year O/M
Cost
“20 Year
Total Cost”
Top 10 $2,210,291 $3,434,354 $56,446,444 $1,430,289 $833,308 $2,263,597 24.9 Note: Estimates based on proportion of High/Mod/Low estimates per improvement type As shown, implementation of the full the Top Ten bicycle improvement projects result in a B-C ratio of 24.9. 163

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
51 Table 17 presents the B-C ratios per each Top Ten bicycle improvements. Due to the fact that ridership estimates are calculated based on population and employment values within one and one-half mile of the proposed project, many of these Top Ten projects have overlapping ridership estimates. As such, the sum-total of new cyclists should not be used to determine the benefit of the Top Ten project list, comprehensively. However, each value is independenttly associated with its corresponding project, and can be used to present project-specific benefits.

Table 17 – Top Ten Independent Benefit-Costs
Project
ID Location Boundary Type Total New
Cyclists
Total
20-Y ear
Benefit
Total 20-
Y ear Cost
Benefit/
Cost
(B-C)
B-001 East Avenue 9th St to McBean
Park Dr
Class I and
Class II 772 $19,845,548 $251,367 79
B-011 SR-65 Crossing Moore Rd west and east
of highway
Class I
Crossing 391 $33,226,509 $575,408 58
B-015 1st Street Douglas Dr to Joiner
Pkwy Class IV-Lite 277 $25,391,548 $105,689 240
B-016 1st Street Joiner Pkwy to R Street Class II 279 $25,325,148 $25,631 988* B-020 E. Joiner Pkwy Twelve Bridges Dr to
north of Ranch View Dr Class IV-Lite 138 $14,064,684 $258,403 54 B-022 5th Street Joiner Pkwy to East Ave Class II 371 $33,477,910 $130,341 257 B-028 Class I under E.

Joiner Pkwy E. Joiner Pkwy Class I 307 $30,270,531 $335,704 90 I-013 Lincoln Blvd
1st Street; 3rd Street;
McBean Park Drive; 5th
Street; 6th Street; 7th
Street
Bicycle
Protection at
Intersections
205 $20,422,001 $261,053 78
I-015 Lincoln Blvd Ferrari Ranch Road
Bicycle
Protection at
Intersections
198 $20,042,293 $32,000 626*
I-017 E. Joiner Pkwy
Sterling Pkwy;
Groveland Ln; Danbury
Dr/Downing Cir;
Moore Road; 1st Street;
3rd Street; 5th Street;
Nicolaus Road
Bicycle
Protection at
Intersections
383 $33,615,253 $288,000 117
Note: Estimates based on proportion of High/Mod/Low estimates per improvement type Benefits described here reflect enhanced conditions, more than other projects, which are focused on new ridership.

As shown, several projects have high B-C ratios due to the high benefit induced from low-cost improvements, such as painted pavement markings. For example, project #B-016 is only 0.31 miles in length. As such, the cost of painted Class II bike lanes is significantly less than the potential benefit accrued over a twenty year period.

In addition, project #I-017 includes bicycle protection improvements at intersections along a 2.3 mile segment of E. Joiner Parkway, thereby capturing a high number of new cyclists from surrounding neighborhoods and places of employment.

Because bicycle protection improvements are not significantly costly, the resulting B-C ratio is high. 164

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
52 FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES
Federal funding is administered through the state (Caltrans and the State Resources Agency) and regional planning agencies. Most, but not all, of these funding programs are oriented toward reducing auto trips and providing inter-modal connections. Many Federal programs require a local match of between 10-20%. Federal funding is intended for capital improvements and safety and education programs and projects must relate to the surface transportation system.

Federal Lands Highway Funds
Federal Lands Highway Funds may be used to build bicycle and pedestrian facilities in conjunction with roads and parkways at the discretion of the department charged with administration of the funds. The projects must be transportation-related and tied to a plan adopted by the State and Metropolitan Planning Organization. Federal Lands Highway Funds may be used for planning and construction and is managed by the United States Department of Transportation.

Transportation, Community and System Preservation Program The Transportation, Community and System Preservation Program provides federal funding for transit oriented development, traffic calming and other projects that improve the efficiency of the transportation system, reduce the impact on the environment, and provide efficient access to jobs, services and trade centers. The program is intended to provide communities with the resources to explore the integration of their transportation system with community preservation and environmental activities. The Program funds, which are administered through the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) require a 20% match, and can be applied to planning, design and construction.

Land and Water Conservation Fund
The Land and Water Conservation Fund is a federally funded program that provides grants for planning and acquiring outdoor recreation areas and facilities. The Fund is administered by the National Parks Service and the California Department of Parks and Recreation. Cities, counties and districts authorized to acquire, develop, operate and maintain park and recreation facilities are eligible to apply. The application deadline is in May, and applicants must fund the entire project, and will be reimbursed for 50% of costs. Property acquired or developed under the program must be retained in perpetuity for public recreational use.

Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) CMAQ Funds are directed to transportation projects and programs which contribute to the attainment or maintenance of National Ambient Air Quality Standards in non-attainment or air quality maintenance areas for ozone, carbon monoxide, or particulate matter under provisions in the Federal Clean Air Act. Eligible projects include bicycle facilities.

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The Highway Safety Improvement Program is managed locally by Caltrans. For a project to be eligible for HSIP funds, the project must be on any public road, publicly owned bicycle path, pedestrian pathway, or trail. Projects must identify a specific safety problem that can be corrected or be improved significantly.

Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP)
Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP) funding is distributed based on population, among the urbanized and non-urbanized areas of the State through Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) such as SACOG and Regional Transportation Planning Agencies. Bicycle facilities are eligible for funding through the federally administered program.

Federal Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
The Federal Highway Administration replaced funding from SRTS in 2012. However, SRTS projects are eligible for 165

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
53 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funds and for Surface Transportation Program (STP) funds. Eligible projects fall under the category of infrastructure (capital improvements), or non-infrastructure (education, encouragement, enforcement).

Transportation Enhancements (TE)
Federal Transportation Enhancement funds are to be used for transportation related capital improvement projects that enhance quality-of-life in or around transportation facilities. Facilities that qualify for TE funds include bicycle safety, education and facility projects. Transportation Enhancements projects are managed locally by Caltrans.

STATEWIDE FUNDING SOURCES
The State of California uses both federal sources and its own budget resources to fund bicycle projects and programs throughout the State.

Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA)
The Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) is an annual program providing state funds for city and county projects that improve safety and convenience for bicycle commuters. In accordance with the Streets and Highways Code (SHC) Section 890-894.2 – California Bicycle Transportation Act, projects must be designed and developed to achieve the functional commuting needs and physical safety of all bicyclists. Local agencies establish eligibility for projects by preparing and adopting a Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) that complies with SHC Section 891.2 – 11 required elements (see Table 1). Funds are available for both planning and construction. Bicycle Transportation Account funding is administered by Caltrans. Caltrans anticipates approximately $7.2 million annually for eligible projects. The maximum amount available to any applicant through the Bicycle Transportation Account is no more than 25 percent of the total amount transferred to the BTA in a single fiscal year. Cities and counties are eligible to apply. All projects must be designed to the standards outlined in Chapter 1000 of the Highway Design Manual. The “call for projects” normally occurs between December and March of each year.

Community Based Transportation Planning Grant Program
This fund, administered by Caltrans, provides funding for projects that exemplify livable community concepts including bicycle improvement projects. Eligible applicants include local governments, Metropolitan Planning Organizations and regional transportation planning agencies. A 20% local match is required and projects must demonstrate a transportation component or objective. There is $3 million available annually statewide. The application deadline is normally in October.

Active Transportation Program (A TP)
The Active Transportation Program (ATP) consolidates existing federal and state transportation programs, including the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP), Biyccle Transportation Account (BTA), and State Safe Routes to School (SR2s), into a single program with a focus to ncrease active transportation in California. Projects should aim to increase the proportion of trips made by bicycling or walking, and increase safety and mobility for non-motorized users.

State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
All STIP projects must be capital projects (including project development costs) needed to improve transportation.

Eligible projects include bicycle facility improvements and improved access to transit and are administered by Caltrans.

Transportation Development Act
Transportation Development Act Article 3 funds are state block grants awarded monthly to local jurisdictions for transit, bicycle and pedestrian projects in California by Caltrans. Funds for pedestrian projects originate from the Local 166

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
54 Transportation Fund, which is derived from a ¼ cent of the general state sales tax. Local Transportation Funds are returned to each county based on sales tax revenues. Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act sets aside 2% of the Local Transportation Funds for bicycle and pedestrian projects. Eligible pedestrian and bicycle projects include: construction and engineering for capital projects; maintenance of bikeways; bicycle safety education programs (up to 5% of funds); and development of comprehensive bicycle or pedestrian facilities plans. A city or county may use these funds to update their bicycle and pedestrian plan not more than once every five years. These funds may be used to meet local match requirements for federal funding sources. Application deadlines vary within individual county transportation agencies.

LOCAL AND REGIONAL FUNDING SOURCES
Developer Impact Fees
Traffic Impact Fees placed on new development typically cover the ultimate build-out of roadways associated with project improvements. The fees are reviewed and updated by the City every few years to reflect current economic conditions and improvement costs.

NON-TRADITIONAL FUNDING SOURCES
Community Development Block Grants
The Community Development Block Grant program provides money for streetscape revitalization, which may be largely comprised of pedestrian improvements such as sidewalks and safe crossing infrastructure. Federal Community Development Block Grant grantees may use these funds for activities that include (but are not limited to):
» acquiring real property
» reconstructing or rehabilitating housing and other property » building public facilities and improvements, such as streets, sidewalks, community and senior citizen centers » recreational facilities, paying for planning and administrative expenses, such as costs related to » developing a consolidated plan and managing Community Development Block Grant funds » provide public services for youths, seniors, or the disabled » initiatives such as “neighborhood watch programs”
167

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
City of Lincoln | 2018 BTP Update
55 IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation of the proposed system will require funding from local, state, and federal sources and coordination with other agencies. To facilitate funding efforts, this section presents conceptual construction cost estimates for the recommended proposed system.

Compliance with the Bicycle Transportation Act (BTA) is a prerequisite for state bicycle funding eligibility. Given that state/ federal sources for bicycle funding has significantly increased since the previous update, this plan was developed to serve as an information resource to facilitate pursuing bicycle funding. Of the potential sources of competitive grant programs that are applicable to funding bicycle improvements, the following are likely candidates for consideration by the City of Lincoln:
» BTA
» State Active Transportation Program (ATP);
» SB-1 ATP Augmentation;
» SB-1 Solutions for Congested Corridors;
» SB-1 Sustainable Communities Planning;
» State Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP);
» Systemic Safety Analysis Resource Program (SSARP);
» Federal Active Transportation Program (ATP); and,
» Federal Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ).

Ostensibly, requisite data/information developed as part of this 2018 Bicycle Transportation Plan (BTP) will serve to inform future competitive grant applications and enhance the City’s relative competitiveness for funding selection.

Simply providing bicycle infrastructure does not guarantee that the majority of potential bicycle riders will actually choose to utilize it if the riding experience is perceived as being stressful or unsafe. In acknowledgement of this, a Traffic Level of Stress (TLS) analysis was performed to identify bikeway network continuity issues caused not only by infrastructure gaps or physical barriers, but also by roadway segments or intersections characterized by moderate to high traffic volumes or speed that could serve to dissuade less confident cyclists from traversing. Concurrent with this technical analysis, a comprehensive public outreach effort was also performed to identify needs. The outreach effort entailed the following:
» Two public workshops – one at the beginning of the study and one at it conclusion; » Circulation of project information cards to schools and the public; » Development of a stakeholder and public contact list; » Periodic eBlasts to inform the public and stakeholders of upcoming project related events and/or information on how to provide input;
» Development and upkeep of a project specific website; » Access to on-line survey on the project website; and, » Development of an interactive web-based tool for soliciting geo-referenced comments and suggestions from the public.

The results of the public outreach effort was documented and considered together with the technical connectivity analysis results to ultimately inform the identification of the proposed bikeway system network and the needed bicycle infrastructure improvements to complete the network. This process resulted in the identification of 31 bicycle infrastructure improvements and an additional 22 improvements at specific intersections within the city. Improvement concepts were based on the updated bicycle guidelines and design standards informed by, but not limited to, the following documents:
168

LINCOLN

BICYCLE TRANSPORT A TION PLAN
2018 BTP Update | City of Lincoln
56 » California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Chapter 1000; Bikeway Planning and Design contained in the Highway Design Manual, 6th Edition;
» California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2010 Edition; » National Association of City Transportation Officials’ (NACTO) Urban Streets Design Guide and Urban Bikeway Design Guide; and,
» Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) Complete Streets Resource Toolkit.

Of the total 53 bicycle improvements in the capital improvement program (CIP), ten projects were identified as high priority by the City. Public input and the connectivity analysis results were key determinants during the top ten selection process. For these ten improvements, ATP grant compatible performance metrics/rubrics using the National Cooperative Highway Research Program 552 methods were used to quantify mode shift and vehicle miles of travel (VMT) reduction benefits. These societal benefits were monetized based on the Caltrans 2016 Economic Parameters and combined with planning level cost opinions to yield a benefit-cost (B-C) ratio for each improvement and inform a priority ranking for implementation. The use of B-C as the holistic metric for determining the return on investment for state/federal funding is a key criteria for most if not all competitive grant programs – including those listed above. This technical information will assist the City on future competitive grant cycle applications for bicycle funding and facilitate implementation of its top ten bicycle improvement projects.

BIKEWA Y SYSTEM PHASING
The specific implementation of any given route or facility, with all other things considered equal, should be based on the following criteria:
» Where an opportunity, such as a road widening or -repaving, makes implementation favorable. » Where new roadways are constructed as part of the general plan development process. » To complete improvements contained in adopted plans that add to circulation efficiency, completeness, and safety » Where an eminent loss of an opportunity makes implementation necessary. » Where resolution of a major obstacle, such as railroad levees, creeks, or embankments, makes implementation necessary. » Where the segment is not connected or otherwise poorly accessible from the rest of the system In addition, the benefit-cost (B-C) ratios provided for each Top 10 bicycle improvement should inform the bikeway system phasing process.

In many situations, the most needed bicycle improvement may not be implemented first. In these cases, external factors such as new construction creates opportunities to provide new bicycle facilities without consideration for need. Therefore, the proposed system does not include a ranking of specific routes, but does include the following list of high priority routes. » East Avenue from 12th Street to McBean Park Drive
» 1st Street from Douglas Drive to Lincoln Boulevard
» E. Joiner Parkway from Twelve Brdiges Drive to North of Ranch View Drive » 5th Street from Joiner Parkway to East Avenue
» Lincoln Boulevard from 1st Street to 7th Street
» Lincoln Boulevard from 1st Street to Ferrari Ranch Road » E. Joiner Parkway from Sterling Parkway to Nicolaus Road 169

BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE
City of Lincoln, California
APPENDIX A: Design Guidelines
170
kimley-horn.com 21820 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 230, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 747-900-8400

TRAFFIC MEMORANDUM
To: Roland Neufeld, Project Manager
City of Lincoln
From: Adam Chase, P.E., T.E., Kimley-Horn and Associates Jim Damkowitch, Kimley-Horn and Associates
Date: January 9th, 2018
Subject: Bicycle Transportation Plan Update - Planning and Design Standards Section Update Design Standards
Bikeway planning and design in California rely on the
guidelines and design standards established by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) and supporting
guides as documented in:
l Chapter 1000; Bicycle Transportation Design,
contained in the Highway Design Manual, 6th Edition
(California Department of Transportation, 2017) with
supporting Chapters 200, 300, and 400.
l California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014 Edition, Revision 2
l Caltrans, Design Information Bulletin Number 89,
Class IV Bikeway Guidance
l Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Separated
Bike Lane Planning and Design guide, 2015
l American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Guide for the
Development of Bicycle Facilities, 2012, Fourth Edition l National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), Urban Bikeway Design Guide, 2014
· Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MDOT),
Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide, 2015
Where possible, it may be desirable to exceed the minimum standards. These guidelines cover basic concepts. The HDM Chapter 1000 contains more detailed standards and guidance and should be followed. The City may also reference the AASHTO Guide, and the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide. Caltrans has supported the NACTO from a memorandum dated August 20, 2013 for Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Flexibility. The NACTO addresses more recently developed bicycle Figure 1: AASHTO Guide for the
Development of Bicycle Facilities, 2012
Edition
171

Page 2 ends

Lincoln City CouncilJanuary 13, 2026

Lincoln City Council
January 13, 2026