Agenda packet — Lincoln City Council, July 28, 2026 (part 3 of 10)

have thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the amended Exhibit B to retroactively apply any portion of such PFE Fee Credit to the Project and obtain an equivalent refund of PFE Fees collected and retained from the Constructing Owner after the Effective Date of this Agreement pending the resolution of the Total Eligible Cost dispute. If Constructing Owner does not elect within such time to have any of the PFE Fee Credits applied to the Project, then any PFE Fees previously collected and retained from the Constructing Owner during such period shall remain eligible for future credit or reimbursement.

SECTION 6. PFE FEE CREDITS - APPLICATION, REIMBURSEMENT, OR TRANSFER PFE Fee Credits earned by the Constructing Owner; (1) may be applied towards PFE Fees related to the Project in accordance with the PFE Policy, or (2) may be requested for reimbursement from the applicable PFE account in accordance with the PFE Policy, or (3) may be transferred to another landowner within the Plan Area.

Pursuant to the DA, PFE Fee Credits earned by Constructing Owner may be applied against the Non-Critical Component of the transportation, wastewater, water, or drainage PFE Fees, or requested for reimbursement from any of the transportation, wastewater, water, or drainage PFE accounts.

If Constructing Owner finances the PFE Facilities with bond proceeds from a Community Facilities District, the PFE Fee Credits must be applied towards the payment of PFE Fees for the Project or another eligible project, in accordance with the PFE Policy. Reimbursements from the applicable PFE account(s) are not permissible under this scenario.

SECTION 7. PRIORITY FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR PFE FEE CREDITS If the updated credit value determined by the “true-up” process described in Section 10 and the PFE Policy (the “Final Credit Value”) exceeds the PFE Fee obligation for the Project, the Constructing Owner may request reimbursement from the PFE Fee account corresponding to the PFE Fee Category in which the applicable credits were earned, subject to availability of funds as determined by the City.

Reimbursements shall be made on a “first-in, first-out” basis, with highest priority given to the PFE facilities and improvements with the earliest City acceptance date and with an approved PFE Credit Agreement. The Constructing Owner may also request to transfer the rights to PFE Fee Credits to another landowner within the Plan Area subject to approval from the City Manager. To transfer the rights to PFE Fee Credits to another landowner within the Plan Area, the Constructing Owner must coordinate with the City to complete, approve, and execute the Certification and Assignment of Fee Credits included hereto as Exhibit C.

Requested reimbursements for excess PFE Fee Credits shall be paid out first for the PFE facilities and improvements with the earliest priorities as described above, until paid in full (i.e., the constructing owner of a PFE facility or improvement with an earlier priority shall receive all available funds in the applicable PFE account until paid in full prior to any reimbursements being paid for a PFE facility or improvement with a later priority. If two or more constructing owners have the same priority (“Equal-Priority Constructing Owners”), after payment in full on any reimbursement for an earlier priority, the reimbursements to such Equal-Priority Constructing Owners shall be paid out pro rata based on the relative amount of the requested reimbursements due thereunder at the time of such payment. For example, if at the time of payment of any reimbursement hereunder, another constructing owner has requested reimbursements for a PFE facility or improvement with the same priority as the PFE Facilities under this Agreement, then such payment would be divided between the Constructing Owner and the other constructing owner in proportion to the relative amounts of the reimbursements then requested under the respective agreements.
399

Page 6 ends

In accordance with the applicable established priorities, the reimbursement hereunder shall be paid to Constructing Owner when the PFE Facilities are completed as determined by the City Engineer (“Completion”) and accepted by the City in writing, or such earlier date after Completion that the City Engineer deems appropriate. The reimbursement shall be paid by the City as fee revenues from the applicable PFE account are collected. After Completion of the PFE Facilities, such payments shall be made by the City at least quarterly throughout the year as funds become available, in the City’s sole discretion.

The obligation arising from this Agreement is not a debt of the City, nor a legal or equitable pledge, charge, lien, or encumbrance, upon any of its property, or upon any of its income, receipts, or revenues, and is payable only and solely from the applicable PFE account.

SECTION 8. TRANSFER OF PFE FEE CREDITS
PFE Fee Credits are personal to the Constructing Owner and do not run with the Project that is generating such credits. Provided the Constructing Owner has no outstanding monetary obligation to the City within the Project, Constructing Owner may assign the rights to the PFE Fee Credits, including the right to request reimbursements against the applicable PFE account, to any other landowner within the Plan Area, subject to the conditions and limitations herein regarding the application of such PFE Fee Credits.

If Constructing Owner has an outstanding monetary obligation to the City as noted above, then the City may require monetary obligation to be met before transfer of the PFE Fee Credits owned by Constructing Owner. Any assignment of the rights to PFE Fee Credits shall be made in writing and delivered to the Administrator in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C. Assigned PFE Fee Credits carry the same priority the assignor had in the PFE Fee Credits.

SECTION 9. ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS TO PFE FEE CREDITS OR REIMBURSEMENTS The estimated cost of the PFE Facilities shall be adjusted annually pursuant to the PFE Policy.

The adjusted amount shall be used to determine the Total Eligible Costs for any credits or reimbursements applied or received until the next annual adjustment.

SECTION 10. "TRUE UP" OF PFE FEE CREDITS
Upon completion of the PFE Facilities by the Constructing Owner and acceptance thereof by the City, the final determination of actual Eligible Hard Costs upon which the PFE Fee Credits amount is based shall be determined by the City Engineer based on documentation thereof provided by Constructing Owner to the City Engineer’s reasonable satisfaction. For construction change orders to be given consideration for reimbursement, the Constructing Owner must:
 Present the change order request and estimated cost along with supporting information to the City Engineer; and
 Fully document any work performed under a change order to verify all associated costs.

Failure to comply with any of these procedures may result in the ineligibility of the requested change order for such PFE Fee Credits.
400

Page 7 ends

To secure final PFE Fee Credits, Constructing Owner shall provide the following items to the City Engineer in order for each to determine the actual Eligible Hard Costs and Eligible Soft Costs incurred by Constructing Owner for the PFE Facilities that qualify for PFE Fee Credits:
(1) Copies of the original Construction Contracts and any change orders that have been agreed to by the Constructing Owner, contractor(s), and the City. The portion of each change order associated with the PFE Facilities must be itemized separately; (2) Copies of all invoices, with unconditional lien releases, submitted by the contractor and suppliers;
(3) Copies of all checks issued by the Constructing Owner with related invoices indicated; (4) A summary tabulation of all contractor and supplier invoices and Constructing Owner payments; and
(5) Prevailing Wage Certification, or documentation acceptable to the City Attorney of an exception to the applicability of prevailing wage.

The Administrator shall review the actual construction costs provided via items (1) through (4) above to determine the actual Total Eligible Costs for the PFE Facilities. If the actual Total Eligible Costs exceed the amount of PFE Fee Credits initially provided hereunder, the actual Total Eligible Costs will serve as the basis for the PFE Fee Credits earned by the Constructing Owner which will result in an increase to the amount described in Exhibit B of this Agreement. Any such increase shall be limited solely to cost increases arising from (i) changes in scope or standards expressly required in writing by the City Engineer during the course of construction, (ii) unforeseen site conditions that could not reasonably have been anticipated at the time of bid, as documented by the City Engineer, or (iii) material and labor cost escalation directly attributable to factors beyond the Constructing Owner's control, as determined by the City Engineer in his or her sole discretion. Cost increases arising from errors or omissions in the Constructing Owner's design documents, scope additions initiated by the Constructing Owner, or the Constructing Owner's failure to competitively bid the Construction Contracts shall not be eligible for increased PFE Fee Credits. The City Engineer shall determine how much of the actual construction costs should be included in any increase to the Total Eligible Costs and Exhibit B shall be adjusted accordingly. However, in no event shall the Final Credit Value awarded to the Constructing Owner upon final reconciliation exceed the cost estimate assumed for the PFE Facilities in the preparation of the PFE Nexus Study, including the annual inflationary adjustments applied as part of the PFE Fee Program.

If the final reconciliation determines that Total Eligible Costs are less than the amount of PFE Fee Credits initially provided hereunder, the Administrator shall notify the Constructing Owner of such reduction of the PFE Fee Credits and Exhibit B shall be revised accordingly. If the amount of PFE Fee Credits applied towards PFE Fees exceeds the final amount of Total Eligible Costs that supported such PFE Fee Credits, then the Constructing Owner shall pay the amount of the PFE Fee Credits that were applied in excess of the confirmed Total Eligible Costs within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of notice from the Administrator of the amount to be paid.

In no event shall PFE Fee Credits exceed the amounts actually paid by the Constructing Owner for Total Eligible Costs. Any determination by the City Engineer under this Section shall be subject to the appeal rights set forth in Section 31 of this Agreement. 401

Page 8 ends

SECTION 11. FAILURE TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION
Failure to complete work within the scope of this Agreement may affect the priority status for the credit or reimbursement granted hereunder, may result in termination of the PFE Fee Credits and termination of the right to apply PFE Fee Credits, and may require payment of any PFE Fee Credits applied, as deemed appropriate by the Administrator. In connection therewith, the Administrator may determine that the Constructing Owner shall not be entitled to further PFE Fee Credits until City acceptance of the PFE Facilities as determined by the City Engineer, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. A change in the priority for any reimbursement will be evaluated from the previously determined priority to the date of acceptance, which may affect priority for the reimbursement. Any determination by the Administrator to invoke the provisions of this Section shall be subject to the appeal rights set forth in Section 31 of this Agreement.

SECTION 12. INSPECTION
City and its authorized representatives shall, at all times, have access to the construction site during construction of the PFE Facilities and Constructing Owner shall furnish City with all reasonable information necessary for ascertaining full knowledge of the PFE Facilities with respect to the progress, workmanship, and character of materials and equipment used and employed in the work.

Whenever the contractors retained by Constructing Owner vary from the normal period during which work or any portion of it is carried out on each day, Constructing Owner shall give timely notice to the City Engineer so that, if he or she wishes, he or she may be present to observe the work in progress. If Constructing Owner fails to give such timely notice, any work done in the absence of a City representative will be subject to rejection. Constructing Owner shall give timely notice to the City Engineer in advance of backfilling or otherwise covering any part of the work so that the City’s representative may, if he or she wishes, observe the work before it is concealed.

Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, all PFE Facilities shall be subject to City inspection for compliance with City requirements prior to issuance of a Letter of Acceptance from the City Engineer. Observation of the work or inspection by the City shall not relieve the Constructing Owner or its sureties of full responsibility for defective materials or workmanship or any of its obligations to complete construction in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer.

SECTION 13. COMPLIANCE WITH PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
Unless otherwise authorized by City Charter, City ordinance, or applicable State statutory or common law, pursuant to the provisions of Articles 1 and 2 of Chapter 1, Part 7, Division II of the Labor Code of the State of California (Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. (“Prevailing Wage Laws")), all work shall be performed in compliance with the Prevailing Wage Laws and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holidays and overtime work, for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the work contemplated under this Agreement shall be paid to all workers, laborers, and mechanics employed in the execution of said work by the Constructing Owner or the Constructing Owner’s contractor, or by any subcontractor doing or contracting to do any part of said work. The appropriate determination of the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations shall be filed by the Constructing Owner with, and made available for inspection at, the office of the City Clerk.

Constructing Owner shall require all contractors to register with the Department of Industrial Relations in accordance with Labor Code section 1725.5. Constructing Owner shall require its contractor to post, at each jobsite, a copy of such prevailing rate of per diem wages as determined by 402

Page 9 ends

the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations. No PFE Fee Credits shall be permissible without full compliance with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

SECTION 14. INSURANCE
Constructing Owner shall require its contractor to carry and maintain for three (3) years after City acceptance of the PFE Facilities, such public liability, property damage and contractual liability, auto, Workers’ Compensation, Builders’ Risk Insurance and other insurance coverage as required by the City in accordance with the improvement plan specifications for the PFE Facilities. The contractor shall name the City as an additional insured. For any claims related to the PFE Facilities, the contractor’s general liability and automobile insurance coverage shall be primary insurance in their coverage of the City and its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers, and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall be excess of the contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

SECTION 15. ACCEPTANCE AND CONVEYANCE OF FACILITIES
Once Constructing Owner has completed construction of the PFE Facilities and the PFE Facilities are deemed satisfactory by the City Engineer following City inspection, the City Engineer may recommend that City Council accept the PFE Facilities, including all associated easements and offers of dedication, provided that all liens, claims, and encumbrances in connection with the PFE Facilities have been released and the required warranty bond has been provided to the City. No acceptance shall be valid without the Constructing Owner conveying and vesting full, complete, and clear title in said PFE Facilities to the City at the time of acceptance.

SECTION 16. LIENS, CLAIMS, AND ENCUMBRANCES
Prior to the City’s acceptance of any PFE Facilities, Constructing Owner shall clear any and all liens, claims, and encumbrances from said PFE Facilities as a condition of acceptance by the City.

SECTION 17. DELIVERY OF AS-BUILT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Prior to acceptance of the PFE Facilities by City, Constructing Owner shall deliver to City copies of all as-built plans (if any), specifications, operating manuals, service manuals, warranties, and other documents relating to the design, construction, and operation of the PFE Facilities described in this Agreement. Upon acceptance of the PFE Facilities, City shall file Notice of Completion with Placer County.

SECTION 18. INDEMNIFICATION
The Constructing Owner, by execution of this Agreement, specifically agrees to protect and assume the defense of, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its elected representatives, officers, employees, agents, and consultants (the "Indemnitees"), from and against all liabilities, actions, lawsuits, damages, claims, losses, or expenses of every type and description, including attorneys’ and consultants’ fees and expenses, (collectively, “Liabilities"), to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of or resulting from the design, construction, or installation of the PFE Facilities, except to the extent the Liabilities arise from the sole negligence, or willful misconduct of the City and/or the Indemnitees. This indemnification shall extend to Liabilities occurring after this Agreement is terminated as well as while it is in force. Notwithstanding the foregoing, following the acceptance of the improvements by the City, or if there is an applicable warranty, following the end of any applicable warranty period, the Constructing Owner shall not be obligated to indemnify the Indemnitees for 403

Page 10 ends

Liabilities to the extent that such Liabilities arise from Indemnitees’ active or passive negligence following acceptance of the PFE Facilities.

SECTION 19. THIRD PARTY LIABILITY
City does not assume any liability, duty, or obligation to Constructing Owner’s contractors, subcontractors, agents, or any person or entity not a party to this Agreement by execution or performance of this Agreement, and no contractors, subcontractors, agents, or any parties are third party beneficiaries of this Agreement.

SECTION 20. WARRANTY
Constructing Owner hereby warrants the PFE Facilities as to materials, design, and workmanship and should any defect or failure of the PFE Facilities, or any parts thereof, occur within a period of one (1) year after final acceptance by City, Constructing Owner shall promptly cause the needed repairs to be made without any expense or cost to the City. Final acceptance shall be deemed to have occurred under this Agreement when the PFE Facilities have been accepted by the City pursuant to a written acceptance from the City Engineer and is placed into actual service. City shall provide written notification to Constructing Owner of final acceptance by the City.

City is hereby authorized to make repairs if Constructing Owner fails to make, or undertake with due diligence, the aforesaid repairs within twenty (20) calendar days after it is given written notice of such defect or failure. In case of emergency, where in the opinion of the City Engineer delay may cause serious hazard to the public, the necessary repairs may be made by the City without prior notice to Constructing Owner. All costs of the repair, if not paid by the Constructing Owner within twenty (20) calendar days of notice from the Administrator to the Constructing Owner, shall be paid out of the Warranty Bond. In no event shall the City be responsible for the cost of the repair within the warranty period. In all cases of defect or failure within the warranty period where the City has taken action in accordance with this paragraph, Constructing Owner shall promptly reimburse City and, if applicable, the Warranty Bond shall fund the repair for any and all costs or expenses, direct or indirect, incurred by the City. The foregoing is in addition to, and shall not in any way limit or affect, the rights of the City to enforce the warranty obligations of Constructing Owner hereunder and to recover any and all costs thereof from the warranty bond posted thereby.

SECTION 21. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
Each and every provision of this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto, in the same manner as if such parties had been expressly named herein.

SECTION 22. ATTORNEY’S FEES
If any suit, action or proceeding in law or equity (except for the dispute resolution process set forth herein) is brought to enforce the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees.

SECTION 23. AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT
Constructing Owner and City certify that they have the authority and are legally empowered to enter into this Agreement on behalf of their entity and to bind their party to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
404

Page 11 ends

SECTION 24. NOTICES
Any notices, requests, demands, or other communications required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally (FedEx and similar services, each of which is hereinafter called an “Express Courier,” shall be considered to be personal service) or by telephone facsimile or other electronic transmission (provided that the sender of a telephone facsimile or other electronic transmission has received confirmation of successful transmission by the sending fax machine), and upon receipt, if mailed to the party to whom notice is to be given, by first-class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, and properly addressed as follows:
(a) If to City:

City of Lincoln
Attn: City Engineer
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Telephone: (916) 434-2400
Facsimile: (916) _________
With a copy to:

City of Lincoln
Attn: City Attorney
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Telephone: (916) 434-2400
Facsimile: (916) _________
(b) If to Constructing Owner:

Taylor Morrison
Attn: Dave Kalemba
81 Blue Ravine Road, Suite 220
Folsom, CA 95630
Tel: 916-605-0640
Either party may change its mailing address at any time by giving written notice of such changes to the other party in the manner provided herein.

SECTION 25. NOTICE OF CONTRACTORS
Constructing Owner shall provide a copy of this Agreement to any contractors, subcontractors, or other parties performing work on the PFE Facilities, prior to commencement of construction by said party.

SECTION 26. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall start on the day and year duly executed by all parties and shall remain in effect until all the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement have been satisfied. 405

Page 12 ends

SECTION 27. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.

SECTION 28. CONFLICTS
This agreement is intended to implement and be consistent with the requirements of the PFE Policy. Therefore, in the event of any conflicts between the PFE Policy and this Agreement, the requirements of the PFE Policy shall prevail and control.

SECTION 29. EXHIBITS
The Exhibits attached hereto are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 30. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties regarding the subject matter hereof. The Agreement may be amended only by writing executed by both parties.

SECTION 31. RIGHT OF APPEAL
The Constructing Owner may appeal any final determination by the Administrator to the City Manager and thereafter to the City Council. Prior to submitting the matter to the City Council, the City Manager may, in his/her discretion, elect to engage the services of a mediator to attempt to mediate the dispute in a non-binding fashion, not to exceed a total of thirty (30) calendar days. Any decision of the City Council shall be final with no right of further appeal or action thereafter.

SECTION 32. EFFECTIVE DATE
The City’s execution of this Agreement shall be contingent upon confirmation by the City Engineer that (i) Construction Contracts have been properly bid and entered into for construction of the PFE Facilities, (ii) performance and payment bonds have been posted in form and amount required by the City, and (iii) a Notice to Proceed has been given to the contractor for the PFE Facilities. The date of such execution by the City, based in part on the City’s confirmation of the satisfaction of the foregoing conditions, shall be deemed to be the “Effective Date" of this Agreement. Upon execution of this Agreement by the City, the City shall insert the Effective Date in the Preamble to this Agreement and provide a copy of this fully executed and dated Agreement to the Constructing Owner. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
406

Page 13 ends

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above-written.

CITY: THE CONSTRUCTING OWNER:

CITY OF LINCOLN, Taylor Morrison of California, LLC,
a municipal corporation a California limited liability company By: By:

Sean Scully Name:

Its: City Manager Title:

ATTEST:

By:

Hope Ithurburn
Its: City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

By:

Vin Cay
Its: City Engineer
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:

By:

Nita Wracker
Its: Finance Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Douglas White
Its: City Attorney
407
Exhibit A

EXHIBIT A

PFE FACILITIES
ENGINEER’S PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
PFE
Item
Critical or
Non-Critical?
PFE Facility
Description
PFE Estimate
of Cost1
R-19A Non-Critical McBean Park Drive (Ferrari Ranch Road - Oak Tree Lane) (3 Lanes) $5,320,299 R-19B Non-Critical McBean Park Drive (Oak Tree Lane - Village 1 Boundary) (Lanes 3 & 4) $582,458 R-38B Non-Critical Intersection of McBean Park Drive & Oak Tree Lane $1,500,222 R-65 Critical Intersection of Ferrari Ranch Road & McBean Park Drive $2,988,231 R-255 Non-Critical Ferrari Ranch Road (North of McBean Park Drive) (Lanes 3 & 4) $248,710 S-25 Non-Critical 30" - Ferrari Ranch Road (McBean Park Drive - 24" Connection) $3,178,579 S-26 Non-Critical 24" - Ferrari Ranch Road (24" Connection - Village 1 Connection) $1,576,546 S-27 Non-Critical 24" - Ferrari Ranch Road (Village 1 Connection - Oak Tree Lane) $1,001,681 W-17B Non-Critical Oversizing to 24" - Oak Tree Lane (McBean Park Drive - Auburn Ravine) $938,520 $17,335,246
1 Based on the amounts estimated in the PFE Nexus Study for each PFE Item, prorated by the percentage of the PFE Facility constructed or caused to be constructed by the Constructing Owner.

Total:
408
Exhibit B

EXHIBIT B

IDENTIFICATION OF PFE FEE CREDITS

ESPLANADE PROJECT WITHIN
THE VILLAGE 1 SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
Taylor Morrison of California, LLC
Transportation, Wastewater, and Water PFE Facilities
Date of Agreement: __________, 2026
PFE
Item
Critical or
Non-Critical?
PFE Facility
Description
PFE Estimate
of Cost1
Initial PFE
Credit Value2
Reconciled "True Up"
PFE Credit Value3
Transportation Improvements
R-19A Non-Critical McBean Park Drive (Ferrari Ranch Road - Oak Tree Lane) (3 Lanes) $5,320,299 $2,496,723 $_______________ R-19B Non-Critical McBean Park Drive (Oak Tree Lane - Village 1 Boundary) (Lanes 3 & 4) $582,458 $291,323 $_______________ R-38B⁴ Non-Critical Intersection of McBean Park Drive & Oak Tree Lane $1,500,222 $1,379,346 $_______________ R-65 Critical Intersection of Ferrari Ranch Road & McBean Park Drive $2,988,231 $1,169,381 $_______________ R-255 Non-Critical Ferrari Ranch Road (North of McBean Park Drive) (Lanes 3 & 4) $248,710 $248,710 $_______________ Subtotals: $10,639,920 $5,585,483 $_______________
Wastewater Improvements
S-25 Non-Critical 30" - Ferrari Ranch Road (McBean Park Drive - 24" Connection) $3,178,579 $1,763,889 $_______________ S-26 Non-Critical 24" - Ferrari Ranch Road (24" Connection - Village 1 Connection) $1,576,546 $874,873 $_______________ S-27 Non-Critical 24" - Ferrari Ranch Road (Village 1 Connection - Oak Tree Lane) $1,001,681 $555,863 $_______________ Subtotals: $5,756,806 $3,194,625 $_______________
Water Improvements
W-17B Non-Critical Oversizing to 24" - Oak Tree Lane (McBean Park Drive - Auburn Ravine) $938,520 $938,520 $_______________ Subtotals: $938,520 $938,520 $_______________
$17,335,246 $9,718,628 $_______________
Critical Transportation PFE Fee Credits: $1,169,381 $_______________ Non-Critical Transportation PFE Fee Credits: $4,416,102 $_______________ Non-Critical Wastewater PFE Fee Credits: $3,194,625 $_______________ Non-Critical Water PFE Fee Credits: $938,520 $_______________ Total PFE Credit Values: $9,718,628 $_______________
1 The PFE Estimate of Cost includes 50% of construction costs for soft costs. However, for PFE Item R-38B, the allowable amount for soft costs is 42.5% of the construction cost per the cost sharing agreement between the Constructing Owner and Century Communities. 2 The Initial PFE Credit Value is calculated as the lesser of the PFE Estimate of Cost and the best available actual cost data as of the Effective Date of this Agreement. 3 To be determined following City acceptance of the PFE Facilities for the Project, pursuant to Section 10 of this Agreement. 4 For PFE Item R-38B, the cost sharing agreement between Century Communities and Constructing Owner states Century Communities will reimburse Constructing Owner for 50% of construction costs, plus an additional 7.5% for soft costs. Therefore, Constructing Owner is eligible for 92.5% of hard construction costs corresponding to PFE Item R-38B.

Totals: 409
Exhibit C

EXHIBIT C

FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF ASSIGNMENT AND

TRANSFER OF PFE FEE CREDITS
Esplanade, Village 1 Specific Plan Area, Transfer Letter #___ Certification and Assignment
of Fee Credits
The undersigned Constructing Owner, as the holder of certain PFE Fee Credits related to the PFE Fee Credit Agreement between the Constructing Owner and the City of Lincoln, dated ________ ___, 202_ (the “Agreement”), hereby assigns, transfers, and conveys to the undersigned Assignee the PFE Fee Credits as indicated in the table below. Assignee acknowledges that the following PFE Fee Credits do not represent all fees payable by Assignee, which may change based upon the size of Assignee’s project and other factors. Constructing Owner and the City wish to certify the availability of the PFE Fee Credits and hereby consent to the assignment of the below PFE Fee Credits to Assignee.

1. The City hereby acknowledges and certifies that Constructing Owner is the current holder of the following PFE Fee Credits pursuant to the Agreement.

2. For good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Constructing Owner does hereby assign and transfer to Assignee; and Assignee does hereby accept from Constructing Owner the assignment and transfer of the PFE Fee Credits as shown in the table below. By signing below the City does hereby consent and agree to the above assignment.

Prior to receiving credit against otherwise due and payable PFE Fees, excluding the payment of the Administration Fees and Critical Component when applicable pursuant to the City’s PFE Implementation Plan and Policies, Assignee should submit this fully executed form to the City for its records.

PFE Fee
Category
PFE Fee
Credit Value
Transportation – Critical $
Transportation – Non-Critical $
Wastewater – Non-Critical $
Water – Non-Critical $
(Signatures are on the following page.)
410
Exhibit C
Esplanade, Village 1 Specific Plan Area, Transfer Letter #__ Certification and Assignment
of Fee Credits
Constructing Owner: Assignee:

Taylor Morrison of California, LLC, _______________________________, a California limited liability company a ______________________________ By:_______________________________ By:_____________________________ Name:_____________________________ Name: __________________________ Title:______________________________ Title:____________________________ City of Lincoln:

By: ______________________________ Date: __________________ __________________, City Manager
Approved as to form
____________________________
________________, City Attorney
411
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Enter into Agreements with Vendors and Encumber Funds for Authorized Expenditures to Provide Goods and/or Services as Funded in the 2026/27 Budget. (Ruthann Codina)
SUBMITTED BY: Ruthann Codina
DEPARTMENT: Finance
DATE: July 28, 2026
Item Number 13.I
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into agreements with the vendors listed in Attachment A and encumber funds for authorized expenditures to provide ongoing and routine goods and/or services required for the City’s daily operations. In addition, this report includes several items which are Regulatory or utilities. These items do not have contracts nor are they encumbered by a purchase order and therefore, are included to provide information to the Council and transparency to the public. All of the items listed within Attachment A are included in the approved FY 2026/27 budget.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

During the development of the City’s annual budget, a number of contracts for ongoing services were identified that exceed the City Manager’s signing authority or their current contract has or will expire during the 2024/25 fiscal year. These include contracts for services that
roll over on a yearly basis or contracts for materials that are used for routine, ongoing operations. The intent of this staff report is to present to City Council a list of vendors that provide the City with routine goods and services so that approval to encumber the funds for these purchases can be authorized in a single action. The majority of these vendors in Attachment A are sole source or qualify as cooperative purchasing contract vendors. For those that do not fall within those categories, Staff will still be required to follow the current purchasing
guidelines to ensure that goods and services are purchased at the best available price.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

Staff has found in past years that requesting a single approval for multiple vendors

STAFF REPORT
412
Staff has found in past years that requesting a single approval for multiple vendors responsible for providing ongoing and routine goods and services is the most cost effective way to maintain the turnaround times for receiving goods and services that are necessary for the City’s daily operational needs.

FISCAL IMPACT:

All of the vendors in Attachment A are included in the approved FY 2024/25 budget and the expenses impact multiple funds. Funds will be encumbered to various accounts appropriately.

ATTACHMENTS:

Blanket PO List FY26-27 final.pdf
26-27_Blanket_PO_Resolution.docx
413
Supplies over $100,000
Vendor Department
26-27
Budget Description
Amazon/Office Depot/Sierra
Office Supply All $ 233,250 Office Supplies/Printing Operational Supplies Aqua Metrics Water / IT $ 511,875
Registers, Meters, MXU's, Meter Reading
Equipment/Software
Curtis / MES / Allstar /
Advantage Gear / Cascade Police / Fire $ 207,000 Equipment/Turnouts/Uniforms Dell/ Lenovo/ CDW/ SHI/ SCH IT $ 215,000 Computer Equipment Echo/SCL/Granite Electrical/Platt
Electrical Streets $ 129,500 Streetlight Supplies
Ferguson / Backflow
Depot/Groeniger/Pace Streets/Water/Wastewater $ 349,000 Water Pipe Supplies Grainger/ Lowes/ Home Depot/
Ace Hardware Public Works $ 101,350 Hardware, Tools, Operational Supplies Kirby Pump/Loewen/CPM Water $ 106,500 Well/Pump Parts
North State Tire Fleet $ 120,000 Tires/Service
Riebes/O'Reilley Fleet $ 100,000 Automotive Supplies
Attachment A
414
Supplies over $100,000
Vendor Department
26-27
Budget Description
Attachment A
Stockton TRI / Schaefer Solid Waste $ 265,000 Residential /Commercial Bins & Totes Spring City/Jam/
Iconis/Pace/Pollard/Grice Streets $ 42,000 Pipe/Sign Supplies Robinson Sand/Rocklin
Industrial/Vulcan/FarWest Streets $ 113,858 Asphalt Products/Street & Sidewalk materials Total Supplies $ 2,494,333
415
Regulatory / Utility
Vendor Department
26/27
Budget Description
WAVE All $ 120,100 Internet, Broadband
Ring Central/AT&T All $ 114,550 Phone lines
City of Lincoln All $ 1,465,100 Municipal water
PG&E All $ 2,597,470 Citywide Electrical
Placer County All $ 1,859,385
APCD, Taxes, Elections, Recorder, OES, Sheriff,
DPW, Radio, Transit Services
Ramos Oil All $ 987,938 Vehicle Fuel & Fuel Additives
Gold Country Media CM/Public Works $ 84,000 Legal Notices, Informational flyers Placer County Water Agency Water $ 12,572,995 Water Purchases SWRCB Public Works $ 140,125 Regulatory - permit fees
Granicus/Peak CM $ 28,000 Automated Agenda
WPGM/SGMA Public Works $ 50,000 West Placer Groundwater Mgmt Plan Dues WPWMA Public Works $ 4,387,826 Utility - Tipping Fees & irrigation lease Verizon All $ 180,428 Utility - City employee cell phones & service Attachment A
416
Regulatory / Utility
Vendor Department
26/27
Budget Description
Attachment A
Bluefin Merchant / US Bank/World
Fuel Finance $ 365,328 Credit Card Fees
Springbrook/Tyler/InfoSend Finance $ 353,100 Financial Software, UB Statement processing NCCSIF/Alliant All $ 20,700 Liability/Property Insurance Barebones/ RedWing/
Amazon/Sierra Office All $ 60,408 City Employee uniforms/safety gear/footwear Ingram/Amazon/InfoBase/MidWest
Tape/Brainfuse/EBSCO Library $ 56,750 Collections
EPIC Airport $ 1,281,600 Airport Fuel
LISWA Wastewater $ 10,269,000 Wastewater Operations
LAFCO Comm Dev $ 63,000 Regulatory Fees: City Share to fund LAFCO Total Regulatory/Utility $ 37,057,803
417
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 1 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE NEW AGREEMENTS WITH

VARIOUS VENDORS PROVIDING ROUTINE GOODS AND SERVICES TO THE CITY OF LINCOLN.

WHEREAS, Staff has compiled a list of vendors as shown in Attachment A for approval to encumber the funds for purchase; and
WHEREAS, the vendors in Attachment A provide routine goods and services to the City of Lincoln; and
WHEREAS, the majority of goods and services noted are sole source or qualify as cooperative purchasing contract vendors; and
WHEREAS, Staff will continue to verify the pricing of goods and services to ensure the lowest available price; and
WHEREAS, all of the items included in Attachment A are included in the approved Fiscal year 2026/27 budget.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lincoln authorizes the City Manager to execute agreements with the vendors in Attachment A for the Fiscal year 2026/27.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
418
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Rescinding Resolution 2026-086 and adopting a Resolution Requesting the Auditor-Controller of Placer County to Attach for Collection on the County Tax Rolls, Those Taxes, Assessments, Fees and/or Charges for
Community Facilities District Nos. 2004-1, 2004-2, 2018-1, and 2018-2 Special Taxes for Fiscal Year 2026/2027. (Nita
Wracker)
SUBMITTED BY: Nita Wracker
DEPARTMENT: Finance
DATE: July 28, 2026
Item Number 13.J
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

City Council adopted Resolution 2026-086 Requesting Collection of Charges on Tax Roll for the several Community Facility Districts, however, due to a typographical error the incorrect fiscal year was indicated on the adopted resolution.

Therefore, City Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution Rescinding Resolution 2026-086 and adopt a Resolution Requesting Placer County Collect the Charges for the following districts on the FY 2026-27 County Property Tax Roll:

TAX CODE NUMBER: 61110
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 772B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61120
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2004-2 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 773B

STAFF REPORT
419
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61415
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2018-1 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 979B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61417
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2018-2 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 980B
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The City has previously formed the Community Facilities Districts (CFDs) referenced above to fund City services as follows:

CFD No. 2004-1
This District was formed to fund the operation and maintenance of the Regional Storm Water Retention Basin (RSWRB), including but not limited to, all costs associated with repairs, direct and third-party management, regulatory compliance, scheduled maintenance and repair resulting from anticipated operations. The funds will also be utilized towards replacement costs of capital improvement items associated with the operation of the RSWRB.

CFD No. 2004-1
This District was formed to fund the maintenance of the Auburn Ravine Improvement Project, the McBean Park Open Space, and the Rodeo Grounds Open Space and Preserve.

CFD No. 2018-1
This District was formed to fund the annual maintenance of City infrastructure such as landscaping, parks, open space, streetlighting, and stormwater quality and drainage facilities.

The CFD tax is separated into two components, “Citywide Services” and “Localized Services.” The improvements to be funded under Citywide Services include costs associated with Community Parks, Regional Parks, Major Roadway Streetlighting and Traffic Signals, Stormwater facilities, Major Roadway Landscaping, and Open Space areas. The improvements to be funded under Localized Services include costs associated with Neighborhood Parks, Neighborhood Landscaping, Local Street Maintenance, Local Streetlighting, and Localized Stormwater Improvements.

CFD No. 2018-2
This District was formed to fund police and fire services resulting from increased demand from new development.

Placer County requires that a resolution requesting a levy be approved by the City Council to place the special taxes associated with the CFDs above on the County property tax roll. 420
FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

The City has the option of direct billing the CFD special taxes to property owners or to request the County of Placer to collect the special taxes in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes. With this resolution, the City is requesting the County collect the CFD special taxes and that the City agrees to the terms of the County pertaining to the collection. The City agrees to pay the County an administration fee equal to 1% of the special taxes placed on the tax roll.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Collection of revenues from the finance districts is necessary for the City to be able to pay the debt service for the bonds of each district. Should the City choose not to levy the taxes, the City would then be responsible for paying the debt service for each bond from General Fund revenues. Collecting finance district taxes through the County as a part of the standard property tax collection process is a more efficient and cost effective manner than by the City billing property owners individually.

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution__2026_-_CFDs_collection_of_taxes.docx
421
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN RESINDING RESOLUTION 2026-086 AND ADOPTING A RESOLUTION REQUESTING COLLECTION OF

CHARGES ON TAX ROLL
FOR TAX YEAR 2026-2027
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61110
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2004-1 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 772B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61120
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2004-2 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 773B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61415
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2018-1 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 979B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61417
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2018-2 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ordinance 980B
WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln requests the County of Placer collect on the County tax rolls certain charges which have been imposed by the City as referenced above; and WHEREAS, the County of Placer has required as a condition of the collection of said charges that the City of Lincoln warrant the legality of said charges and defend and indemnify the County of Placer from any challenge to the legality.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution 2026-086 and adopts a Resolution wherein The Auditor-Controller of Placer County is requested to attach for collection on the County tax rolls those taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges, attached hereto.

Section 2. The City of Lincoln warrants and represents that the taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges imposed the City of Lincoln and being requested to be collected by Placer County comply with all requirements of state law, including but not limited to Articles XIIIC and XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218).

Section 3. The City of Lincoln releases and discharges County, and its officers, agents, and employees from any, and all claims, demands, liabilities, costs and expenses, damages, causes of action, and judgments, in any manner arising out of the collection by County on the property tax roll of any taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges on behalf of City of Lincoln.

Page 2 of 2 ends

assessments, fees and/or charges requested to be collected by County for the City of Lincoln, or in any manner arising out of City of Lincoln’s establishment and imposition of said taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges. The City of Lincoln agrees that, in the event a judgment is entered in a court of law against any of the Indemnified Parties as a result of the collection of one of the City of Lincoln’s taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges, the County may offset the amount of the judgment from any other monies collected by County on behalf of the City of Lincoln, including property taxes.

Section 5. The City of Lincoln agrees that its officers, agents, and employees will cooperate with the County by responding to all inquiries referred to the City of Lincoln by County from any person concerning the City of Lincoln’s taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges, and that the City of Lincoln will not refer such persons to County officers and employees for response.

Section 6. The City of Lincoln agrees to pay the County for the reasonable and ordinary charges to recoup its costs of placement and collection on the tax rolls at the agreed upon rate of 1% of the taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges, as provided by Government Code sections 29304 and 51800.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
423
SUBJECT:

Adopt a Resolution Rescinding Resolution 2026-087 and
Adopt a Resolution Requesting Placer County Collect the Charges for the Following Districts on the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Property Tax Roll: Community Facilities District Nos. 1998-1, 2006-1 Improvement Area 1, 2006-1 Improvement Area 2,
2003-1 Series 2018, 2005-1 Sorrento Project, 2010-1; 2019-1 Independence at Lincoln; 2025-1 Joiner Ranch East; Foskett Ranch Assessment District No. 2004-3; Twelve Bridges
Assessment District Nos. 1995-1 Series 1999, and 1995-1 Series 2001 Special Taxes on Placer County Property Tax Roll. (Nita Wracker)
SUBMITTED BY: Nita Wracker
DEPARTMENT: Finance
DATE: July 28, 2026
Item Number 13.K
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

City Council adopted Resolution 2026-087 Requesting Collection of Charges on Tax Roll for the several Community Facility Districts, however, due to a typographical error the incorrect fiscal year was indicated on the adopted resolution.

City Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution Requesting Placer County Collect the Charges for the following districts on the FY 2026-27 County Property Tax Roll:

TAX CODE NUMBER: 61100
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 1998-1 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 667B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61130
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Improvement Area 2 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 816B

STAFF REPORT
424
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61140
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Improvement Area CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 816B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61400
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, Series 2018 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 740B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61405
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Sorrento Project) CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2009-103
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61410
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2010-1 (Police & Fire Services) CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2010-133 & 2010-157
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61420
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Communities Facilities District No. 2019-1, Independence at Lincoln
CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2019-230
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61423
DIRECT CAHRGE NAME: Communities Facilities District No. 2025-1 Joiner Ranch East CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 1098B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61510
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Foskett Ranch Assessment District No. 2004-3 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2004-202
TAX CODE NUMBER: 84800
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Twelve Bridges Assessment District No. 1995-1, Series 1999 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 95-72
TAX CODE NUMBER: 84900
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Twelve Bridges Assessment District No. 1995-1, Series 2001 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 95-72
BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:
425
In previous years the City has formed the finance districts listed above and issued bonds specific to each district. Placer County requires that a resolution requesting a levy be approved by the City Council to place the special taxes associated with the finance districts above on the County property tax roll.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

The annual charges collected on the County tax rolls are necessary for the City to pay the debt service for the respective bonds. With this resolution the City is requesting the County collect the charges as in the previous years, and that the City agrees to the terms of the County pertaining to the collection. The City agrees to pay the County and administrative fee equal to 1% of the assessment.

FISCAL IMPACT:

ATTACHMENTS:

Resolution__2026_-_CFDs_collection_of_taxes_2 (1).docx
Placement_of_Finance_District_Taxes-Attachment_J_Ord_1098B.pdf Placement_of_Finance_District_Taxes-Attachment_K_Reso_2009-103.pdf 426
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 3 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN RESINDING RESOLUTION 2026-087 AND ADOPTING A RESOLUTION REQUESTING COLLECTION OF CHARGES ON TAX ROLL FOR TAX YEAR 2026-2027 TAX CODE NUMBER: 61100
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 1998-1 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 667B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61130
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Improvement Area 2
CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 816B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61140
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2006-1, Improvement Area 1
CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 816B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61400
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2003-1, Series 2018 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 740B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61405
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, Sorrento CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2009-103
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61410
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Community Facilities District No. 2010-1 (Police & Fire Services)
CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2010-133 & 2010-157
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61420
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Communities Facilities District No. 2019-1, Independence at Lincoln
CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2019-230
TAX CODE NUMBER: 91423
DIRECT CHARGE NUMBER: Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 Joinder Ranch East CITY AUTHORIZATION: Ord 1098B
TAX CODE NUMBER: 61510
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Foskett Ranch Assessment District No. 2004-3 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 2004-202
TAX CODE NUMBER: 84800
427
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 2 of 3 ends

DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Twelve Bridges Assessment District No. 1995-1, Series 1999 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 95-72 TAX CODE NUMBER: 84900
DIRECT CHARGE NAME: Twelve Bridges Assessment District No. 1995-1, Series 2001 CITY AUTHORIZATION: Resolution 95-72
WHEREAS, the City of Lincoln requests the County of Placer collect on the County tax rolls certain charges which have been imposed by the City as referenced above; and WHEREAS, the County of Placer has required as a condition of the collection of said charges that the City of Lincoln warrant the legality of said charges and defend and indemnify the County of Placer from any challenge to the legality.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution 2026-087 and adopts a Resolution wherein the Auditor-Controller of Placer County is requested to attach for collection on the County tax rolls those taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges, attached hereto.

Section 3. The City of Lincoln releases and discharges County, and its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims, demands, liabilities, costs and expenses, damages, causes of action, and judgments, in any manner arising out of the collection by County on the property tax roll of any taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges on behalf of City of Lincoln.

Section 4. In consideration for the County’s collection of the charge through the County’s property tax roll, the City of Lincoln agrees to and shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officers, agents and employees (the “Indemnified Parties”) from any and all claims, demands, liabilities, costs and expenses, damages, causes of action, and judgments, in any manner arising out of the collection by County of any of the City of Lincoln’s said taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges requested to be collected by County for the City of Lincoln, or in any manner arising out of City of Lincoln’s establishment and imposition of said taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges. The City of Lincoln agrees that, in the event a judgment is entered in a court of law against any of the Indemnified Parties as a result of the collection of one of the City of Lincoln’s taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges, the County may offset the amount of the judgment from any other monies collected by County on behalf of the City of Lincoln, including property taxes.
428
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 3 of 3 ends

Section 5. The City of Lincoln agrees that its officers, agents and employees will cooperate with the County by responding to all inquiries referred to the City of Lincoln by County from any person concerning the City of Lincoln’s taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges, and that the City of Lincoln will not refer such persons to County officers and employees for response.

Section 7. The City of Lincoln agrees to pay the County for the reasonable and ordinary charges to recoup its costs of placement and collection on the tax rolls at the agreed upon rate of 1% of the taxes, assessments, fees and/or charges, as provided by Government Code sections 29304 and 51800.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
429
ORDINANCE NO. 1098B

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN,

CALIFORNIA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF LINCOLN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1 (JOINER

RANCH EAST) AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2025, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Lincoln (the “City”) adopted Resolution No. 2025-087 declaring its intention to form City of Lincoln Community Facilities District No. 2025-1 (Joiner Ranch East) (the “District”) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, comprising Chapter 2.5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the “Act”), and its Resolution No. 2025-088 declaring its intention to incur bonded indebtedness for the District; and
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, after providing all notice required by the Act, the City Council conducted a noticed public hearing required by the Act relative to the proposed formation of the District, the proposed levy of a special tax therein to finance certain public facilities described in Resolution No. 2025-087 and to secure the payment of any bonded indebtedness of the District, and the proposed issuance of bonded indebtedness in one or more series in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $23,500,000, as described in Resolution No. 25-088; and
WHEREAS, at the August 12, 2025 public hearing, all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the proposed levy of the special tax to finance the facilities described in Resolution No. 2025-087 and to secure the payment of bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $23,500,000 of the District as described in Resolution No. 2025-088 (the “Bonds”) were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 2025-120, 2025-121, and 2025-122 which formed the District and called a special election within the District on August 12, 2025 on three propositions relating to the levy of a special tax within the District, the issuance of the Bonds and the establishment of an appropriations limit within the District; and
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, a special election was held within the District at which the qualified electors approved by more than a two thirds vote Propositions A, B, and C authorizing the levy of a special tax within the District for the purposes described in Resolution 2025-120, the issuance of the Bonds as described in Resolution No. 2025-121 and establishing an appropriations limit for the District; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN, CALIFORNIA,

ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF CITY OF LINCOLN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2025-1 (JOINER RANCH EAST) DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
430
Ordinance No. 1098B

Page 2 of 4 ends

Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct.

Section 2. By the passage of this Ordinance, the City Council authorizes and levies special taxes within the District pursuant to Sections 53328 and 53340 of the Act at the rates and in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment set forth in Attachment C to Resolution No. 2025-087, which is incorporated by reference herein (the “Rate and Method”). The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in the fiscal year specified in the Rate and Method and in each fiscal year thereafter until payment in full of the Bonds (including any bonds issued to refund the Bonds), payment of all costs of the public facilities and services authorized to be financed by the District, and payment of all costs of administering the District.

Section 3. Each of the Mayor, the City Manager, the Assistant City Manager, the Director of Finance, or their written designees (each, an “Authorized Officer”), acting alone, is hereby authorized and directed each fiscal year to determine the specific special tax rates and amounts to be levied in such fiscal year on each parcel of real property within the District, in the manner and as provided in the Rate and Method. The special tax rate levied on a parcel pursuant to the Rate and Method shall not exceed the maximum rate set forth in the Rate and Method for such parcel, but the special tax may be levied at a lower rate. Each Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Placer and to otherwise take all actions necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at times necessary to satisfy the financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year, and with respect to Special Tax, until the Bonds are paid in full, the facilities have been paid for, and provision has been made for payment of all of the administrative costs of the District.

Section 4. Properties or entities of the state, federal or other local governments shall be exempt from the special tax, except as otherwise provided in Sections 53317.3 and 53317.5 of the Act and Section G of the Rate and Method. No other properties or entities are exempt from the special tax unless the properties or entities are expressly exempted in Resolution No. 2025-120 or in a resolution of consideration to levy a new special tax or special taxes or to alter the rate or method of apportionment or an existing special tax as provided in Section 53334 of the Act.

Section 5. All of the collections of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Act, the Rate and Method and Resolution No. 2025-120.

Section 6. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes are collected and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure, sale and lien priority in case of delinquency as is provided for ad valorem taxes (which such procedures include the exercise of all rights and remedies permitted by law to make corrections, including, but not limited to, the issuance of amended or supplemental tax bills), as such procedure may be modified by law or by this City Council from time to time.
431
Ordinance No. 1098B

Page 3 of 4 ends

Section 7. As a cumulative remedy, if any amount levied as a special tax for payment of the interest or principal of the Bonds (including any bonds issued to refund the Bonds), together with any penalties and other charges accruing under this Ordinance, are not paid when due, the City Council may, not later than four years after the due date of the last installment of principal on the Bonds (including any bonds issued to refund the Bonds), order that the same be collected by an action brought in the superior court to foreclose the lien of such special tax, as authorized by the Act.

Section 8. The Mayor of the City shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk (referred to herein as the “City Clerk”) shall attest to the Mayor’s signature and then cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in The Lincoln New Messenger, a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Lincoln.

Section 9. The specific authorization for adoption of this Ordinance is pursuant to the provisions of Section 53340 of the Act.

Section 10. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to transmit a certified copy of this ordinance to the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County of Placer, and to perform all other acts which are required by the Act, this Ordinance or by law in order to accomplish the purpose of this Ordinance.

Section 11. A full reading of this Ordinance is dispensed with prior to its final passage, a written or printed copy having been available to the City Council and the public a day prior to its final passage.

Section 12. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty days after its final passage.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lincoln held on August 12, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Andreatta, Brown, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: Andreatta, Brown, Eklund, Pearl, Reedy NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
432
Ordinance No. 1098B

Page 4 of 4 ends

______________________________
Holly Andreatta, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
433
434
435
SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution Supporting the Nomination of Census Tract 06061021403 for Designation Under Federal Opportunity Zone

2.0 Program. (Nita Wracker)
SUBMITTED BY: Nita Wracker
DEPARTMENT: City Manager's Office
DATE: July 28, 2026
Item Number 13.L
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommend City Council adopt a Resolution Supporting the Nomination of Census Tract 214.03 (06061021403) for Designation Under Federal Opportunity Zone 2.0 Program.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The federal Opportunity Zone program was established by Congress through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to encourage long-term private investment in economically distressed communities by providing federal tax incentives for investments made within designated Opportunity Zones.

The original Opportunity Zone designations expire on December 31, 2026. Congress has since established Opportunity Zones 2.0, creating a new ten-year designation cycle for investments made beginning January 1, 2027. California has initiated a statewide nomination process whereby local agencies may submit recommendations to assist the Governor in selecting eligible census tracts for nomination to the United States Department of the Treasury.

Unlike the original designation process, California is encouraging local and regional participation to ensure nominations reflect community priorities, economic development goals, housing needs, infrastructure investments, and regional planning efforts.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

Staff have determined Census Tract 214.03 (06061021403) meets the requirements for nomination of a designation under Federal Opportunity Zone 2.0 Program. While the nomination period ended July 20, 2026 and staff did submit an application for nomination of this Census Tract, we feel it important that City Council determine their support for this effort through Council resolution.

This Census Tract can advance multiple priority sectors as defined by the California Jobs First State Blueprint such as childcare, education & skilled workforce, financial & professional

STAFF REPORT
436
services, healthcare, housing, and tourism & outdoor recreation through its mix of residential neighborhoods, public uses, parks, schools, and nearby employment assets. The tract supports tourism and recreation through local parks and access to community-serving recreational amenities. Its concentration of middle and high schools strengthens the education and workforce pipeline, while nearby assets—including the Lincoln Regional Airport, site for Jessup University’s flight training operations, and adjacent industrial/manufacturing opportunity areas—create pathways for aviation, manufacturing, and skilled trades.

Residential areas, schools, and allowable land uses also support expanded childcare services.

The planned Downtown Innovation Hub in Old City Hall bordering the tract will further support entrepreneurship by providing space for startups, graduate students, and small business development. The tract also includes parcels zoned for business and professional uses, supporting financial and professional services. Its proximity to urgent care and hospital services strengthens access to healthcare, while identified Housing Element sites within the tract can accommodate approximately 154 affordable units, helping implement the City’s RHNA obligations.

Census Tract 214.03 is well positioned to attract public and private investment due to its strategic location, strong growth trajectory, and proximity to key economic assets. The tract is near Lincoln’s historic downtown, with convenient access to State Route 65, a major regional transportation corridor connecting residents, employers, and visitors throughout Placer County and the greater Sacramento region. Significant residential growth is planned nearby, including approximately 13,000 units over the next 15–20 years, creating demand for retail, services, housing, employment, and infrastructure investment. The area also benefits from nearby development-ready land, including approximately 84 acres with future economic development potential. Additional assets include the Lincoln Regional Airport and aviation-related workforce opportunities, as well as emerging commercial investment along the Highway 65/Nelson Lane corridor. The Downtown Innovation Hub at Old City Hall further strengthens the tract’s appeal by supporting entrepreneurs, small businesses, and startups through coworking space, technical assistance, and collaboration with graduate students to support business formation and expansion. Lincoln’s ranking as California’s third safest city further enhances its appeal to employers, investors, and residents by underscoring the community’s strong quality of life, amenities, and competitive market position.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact associated with adoption of the proposed resolution. If the designation is approved by the federal government, future private investment may generate long-term economic activity, property rehabilitation, business expansion, housing development and increased property and sales tax revenues.

ATTACHMENTS:

Opportunity Zone 2.0 - Resolution, 2026.docx
Census Tract_060610214.03.pdf
437
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 1 of 2 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN SUPPORTING THE NOMINATION OF CENSUS TRACT 214.03 (06061021403) FOR DESIGNATION UNDER FEDERAL OPPORTUNITY ZONE 2.0 PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the federal Opportunity Zone program is intended to encourage longterm private investment in economically distressed communities through federal tax incentives for qualifying investments in designated census tracts; and WHEREAS, Opportunity Zones 2.0 establishes a new ten-year designation cycle for eligible census tracts, with new designations taking effect for investments made on or after January 1, 2027; and
WHEREAS, the State of California, through the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development and the Department of Finance, has established a local authority recommendation process to inform the Governor’s selection of census tracts for nomination to the United States Department of the Treasury; and WHEREAS, the local authority recommendation process allows recommendations to be submitted by cities, counties, special districts, regional joint powers authorities, councils of governments, and tribal governments; and
WHEREAS, Census Tract 214.03 (06061021403) meets eligibility requirements and demonstrates strong potential for redevelopment and economic growth; and WHEREAS, designation of this tract as an Opportunity Zone would support multiple priority sectors as defined by the California Jobs First State Blueprint such as childcare, education & skilled workforce, financial & professional services, healthcare, housing, and tourism & outdoor recreation through its mix of residential neighborhoods, public uses, parks, schools, and nearby employment assets; and WHEREAS, Census Tract 214.03 (06061021403) includes sites that can accommodate approximately 154 affordable units, helping implement the City’s Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) obligation.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. The City Council hereby supports the nomination of Census Tract 214.03 (06061021403) for designation under the Federal Opportunity Zone 2.0 Program.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:
438
Resolution No. 2026-XXX

Page 2 of 2 ends

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
439
440
SUBJECT: Windsor Cove Project (Mikaela Noble)
SUBMITTED BY: Mikaela Noble
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
DATE: July 28, 2026
Item Number 14.A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, consider the information contained in the staff report, the testimony of the public, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation of approval, and take the following actions:

1. Determine that the project does not require additional environmental pursuant to review California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan), because the residential project is undertaken pursuant to and in conformity with a specific plan (e.g., Village 5 Specific Plan) adopted under Government Code Title 7, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8; and, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2), that the project is within the scope of the Program EIR and that no subsequent environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162.

Therefore, no new environmental document is required.

2. Adopt a Resolution amending the Village 5 General Development Plan to include development standards for the project area (Area J1).

3. Adopt a Resolution approving a Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the proposed Windsor Cove Project.

4. Adopt a Resolution approving a Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the proposed Windsor Cove Project.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The Windsor Cove Project (project) is located within the Village 5 Specific Plan (see Attachments 1 and 2). The Village 5 Specific Plan (Specific Plan) and General Development Plan (GDP) provides direction for development of 2,737 acres of land within the City of Lincoln (City). The Specific Plan identifies land use and zoning designations for the plan area, the circulation system, utilities systems, parks and open space, and other planning considerations.

In addition, the Specific Plan includes a wide range of goals and policies, design guidelines and development standards that will guide development within Village 5.

The following is a brief timeline for the Village 5 Specific Plan and the Windsor Cove Project:

December 12, 2017: City adopts the Specific Plan and General Development Plan, certifies an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2014052071) and adopts Mitigation Monitoring Plan.

STAFF REPORT
441
September 7, 2018: Filing of application for Windsor Cove Project September 14, 2021: City certifies partially recirculated EIR, adopts revised Mitigation Monitoring Plan, initiates annexation proceedings.

February 2023: City approves Addendum to Village 5 EIR to remove mitigation measures that were superseded by adoption of Placer County Conservation Program (PCCP).

September 13, 2023: Placer Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCo) approved the annexation of the entire Village 5 Specific Plan into the City.

November 8, 2023: Following the procedural protest vote conducted by Placer LAFCo Executive Officer, the Village 5 Specific Plan annexation approval was reversed and officially terminated.

January 2025: Following the unsuccessful annexation of Village 5 Specific Plan, a reduced portion of the plan area – known as Village 5A, consisting of 2,721 acres – was formally approved for annexation into the City. Village 5A contemplates development of approximately 5,700 dwelling units and 3.2 million square feet of commercial.

Approximately 2,040 acres of the adopted Village 5 Specific Plan area were not included in that annexation due to opposition of the property owners.

January 2025 to current: Since the annexation of Village 5A, no development has occurred within the plan area, although on-going master planning for major backbone infrastructure has been initiated in support of formal development entitlement application submittals.

Planning Commission Actions
The City of Lincoln Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed project on Wednesday, June 17, 2026.

There was a discussion regarding the additional open space acreage provided by the project, as the Commission traditionally sees developers requesting more area to develop. Staff clarified that the increase open space was prompted to comply with the Placer County Conservation Program (PCCP) and the Placer County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP).

One commissioner requested that an additional internal trail that connects to the new Nelson Lane near the midpoint of the subdivision. Deliberation ensued regarding this request and the feasibility to add a pedestrian connection at the cost of residential lots. Ultimately, the Planning Commission recommended, by a 5-0-0-1 vote, that the City Council approve the project.

After the Planning Commission meeting, staff coordinated with the applicant and determined the trail connection at the location requested by the commissioner was infeasible due to lot size constraints and applicable development standards, and would have further reduced the site’s available developable area. Nonetheless, the applicant has provided a revised Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map layout that includes a trail connection from Open Space 7 (OS 7) between two Village Country Estates (VCE) lots to increase pedestrian connectivity opportunities within the subdivision, while maintaining a proposed connection to New Nelson Lane, consistent the spirit of the request (see Attachment 10, Exhibit C).

Project Location and Description
The project site is located on approximately 90 acres in the City of Lincoln northeast of the Moore Road/Fiddyment Road intersection within the annexed portion of the Village 5 Specific Plan on Assessor’s Parcel Number 021-490-002-000 (see Attachments 1 through 3). The 442
project site is bounded by Auburn Ravine and undeveloped land to the north and west; Moore Road and the Lincoln Wastewater Treatment Facility to the south; and existing homesteads within Placer County to the east. The Village 5 Specific Plan identifies that a new North-South arterial roadway – referred to as New Nelson Lane – will be constructed along the project site’s western property boundary. New Nelson Lane will provide connectivity between State Route (SR) 65 to the north and Fiddyment Road and Moore Road to the south.

There are a number of existing structures on the project site associated with an inhabited rural residence, including a large metal outbuilding, sheds, hardscape and animal enclosures. The current inhabitants are aware that the proposed project would require removal during site preparation.

Land Use Designations and Zoning
The project would develop Village 5 Area J1, which is zoned Village Country Estates (VCE), Village Low Density Residential (VLDR), and Village Open Space Preserve (VOSP). The VCE land use designation is intended for large traditional residential development and accessory structures, with a density range of 1.0 to 2.9 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The VLDR land use designation is intended for single-family detached homes on standard or alley-loaded lots, with a density range of 3.0 to 5.9 du/ac. The VOSP land use designation is applied to natural resources within the Specific Plan Area including, but not limited to, creeks, seasonal wetlands, vernal pools, and swales.

The project is subject to the Placer County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) due to its proximity to the Lincoln Regional Airport. The project site is located within ALUCP Zones C1, C2, D and Wildlife Critical Zone (Attachment 4).

The project would make minor changes to the boundaries of the land use designations with the project site (Attachment 5 and Table 1), as discussed below.

Project Components
The applicant has submitted a Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map to allow for the creation of the specific lots within the project site (Attachment 10, Exhibit B). The subdivision map would create a total of 165 residential lots. Of the residential lots, there would be 52 VCE-zoned lots on 26.39 acres, with a density of 1.97 du/acre. In addition, there would be 113 VLDR- zoned lots on 20.04 acres, with a density of approximately 5.64 units per acre. The subdivision map also includes approximately 33 acres of open space/parks and recreation (8 lots) located in the northern and center portions of the project site. In addition, the applicant has included the option to install an onsite sewer lift station if required by the City to facilitate the project’s sewer system.

The proposed park is located along an open space corridor and would connect to the pedestrian network within the project site, which ultimately connects with future pedestrian corridors throughout the Village 5 plan area. Final design of the park and the respective amenities have yet to be determined.

The project would be developed with land uses and densities that are consistent with the adopted Specific Plan and General Development Plan. The acreage for each use would vary slightly from the adopted Specific Plan, as shown in Table 1 and Attachment 5. In addition, parcel boundaries would be modified slightly, including the boundaries for VOSP parcels. As a result, there would be an increase in approximately 20 acres of open space, with a 443
corresponding decrease in amount of acreage for residential uses.

The layout of the proposed project is shown in Attachment 6. Residential lot sizes would range from 5,233 to 31,564 square feet (SF) depending on zoning, with average lot sizes of approximately 5,900 SF and 19,300 SF for VLDR and VCE lots, respectively. Residential lots would range from 50 to 140 feet in width (most VLDR and VCE lots would be 50 feet and 120 feet wide, respectively) and 100 to 240 feet in depth. The 165 residential lots would be single or two-story single-family residences.

The proposed project would be a private, gated community with a homeowner’s association (HOA) that will maintain internal subdivision roads, park facilities and other infrastructure and amenities.

Table 1
Land Use Comparison
Land Use/Zoning
Adopted
Specific Plan
Acreage
Proposed
Acreage
Difference
Village Country Estates
(VCE)

47.77 26.39 -21.38
Village Low Density
Residential (VLDR)

21.77 20.04 -1.73
Village Open Space
Preserve (VOSP)

12.33 32.17 +19.84
Village Parks and
Recreation (VPR)
0 0.97 +0.97
Landscape Corridor (LSC) 1.65 4.16 +2.51
Right-of-Way (ROW) 6.48 6.27 -0.21
Total 90.0 90.0 0
Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map
The project includes a Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map that may be recorded independently of the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (Attachment 9, Exhibit C). The Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map has been designed to allow for the creation of specific lots, Irrevocable Offer of Dedications (IODs) for rights-of-way, and phasing of residential development based on the Large Lot configurations proposed.

Circulation
Primary access to the project site would be provided by two separate points of connection to Moore Road. This section of Moore Ranch is planned to have two travel lanes in each direction, with bike/NEV lanes and separated sidewalk on northern side of the road adjacent to the project site. Moore Road is a westerly extension of Ferrari Ranch Roach and an IOD is required in order for roadway development. The proposed project would construct frontage improvements along Moore Road and the future roadway along the western portion of the project site (labeled as New Nelson Lane). Other than the referenced improvements, New Nelson Lane is not proposed to be constructed with this project; however, while actual construction of New Nelson Lane is not required for this project, an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication (IOD) is required in order to facilitate future roadway connectivity for the Specific 444
Plan.

The internal subdivision circulation system consists of a connected internal local-street network organized into two connected loops. The western portion serves several smaller residential blocks through interconnected loop-style streets, while the eastern portion is served by a larger elongated loop road. Together, the system provides continuous internal circulation, lot access, and multiple points of movement between the residential neighborhoods, park/open space areas, and the adjoining street network. Circulation details are provided in Attachment 10, Exhibit C.

Site Development and Utilities
Site development would include grading to establish necessary pads and foundations, construction of retaining walls, installation of utility lines (i.e., water, sewer, drainage, electrical, etc.), and the establishment of open space areas and trail systems. Water, sewer and drainage services will be provided by the City of Lincoln. Under the Specific Plan, major water, sewer and dry utility lines will be constructed by the Windsor Cove project within the Moore Road right-of-way, if not already constructed by others. Preliminary utility plans are provided in Attachment 10, Exhibit C. Prior to commencement of any construction, the project applicant would be required to obtain various construction approvals including environmental permits, a grading permit, improvement plans, and building permits.

New onsite and offsite infrastructure are proposed to be constructed as part of the project consistent with the Village 5 Specific Plan. Water, sewer and drainage services will be provided by the City of Lincoln. Under the Village 5 Specific Plan, major water, sewer and dry utility lines will be placed within the Moore Road right-of-way. The City’s sewer and water systems are capable of accommodating the proposed project.

A water quality basin would be constructed in the northwestern portion of the project site (OS 4) to collect and treat project stormwater runoff, and a water quality swale is located near the center of the project site (OS 7).

Depending on infrastructure requirements, the applicant may need to construct a sewer lift station to serve the Windsor Cove project; therefore, an alternative lotting configuration is provided to allow for the construction of a sewer lift station in the southwest corner of the VLDR development. The lift station could be located in an alternative location that is acceptable to the City Engineer.

Offsite Improvements
The proposed project includes three offsite components. First, the proposed project would widen Moore Road south of the project’s southern boundary to conform to the ultimate design of this roadway segment, including additional vehicle lanes, a bike/NEV lane, drainage ditch, and a separated sidewalk. Second, the project would construct an offsite 24-inch water line from the project site to tie into an existing water system east of the project site within Moore Road (approximately 1,620 feet). Lastly, if not already constructed by others, the project would construct a 54-inch sewer line from the project site to connect to the City of Lincoln Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility (WWTRF) south of the project site. The pipe sizes are preliminary and must be verified for adequacy during improvement plan review, as required by the conditions of approval.
445
General Development Plan Amendment
The adopted Village 5 GDP includes planning level detail for Planning Areas A1 and A2 (Attachment 7). It was established that in order to implement the Village 5 Specific Plan, subsequent entitlements must be processed and approved by the City, including GDP Amendments or the creation of new GDPs for Planning Areas B through J. The Windsor Cove Project is located in Area J, and therefore, must process a GDP Amendment to proceed with development pursuant to Village 5 GDP Section 2.3.

Development Agreement
The Village 5 Specific Plan requires adoption of a Development Agreement, which delineates the obligation of the project proponent and the City with respect to the implementation of the project. Typically, the Development Agreement vests the right of the developer to develop the project as approved and sets out obligations of both the City and the developer. The provisions of the Development Agreement run with the property, so they continue to be in force even if the property ownership is transferred. The term of the Development Agreement is 20 years after the effective date. The Final Development Agreement must be adopted by Ordinance by the City Council. The Windsor Cove Project Development Agreement is undergoing a separate negotiation process between the applicant and City staff, and will be considered separate from this application at a later date.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

General Plan
The 2050 City of Lincoln General Plan serves as the guiding land use document for the City of Lincoln. The proposed Windsor Cove Project application is consistent with the applicable policies of the 2050 General Plan as follows:

A. The proposed Windsor Cove Project will increase the housing stock and diversity in the City by developing 165 low-density residential units at an overall density of 3.6 units per acre (Housing Element Policy 2 and Land Use Element Policy LU-1.7).

B. The proposed Windsor Cove Project, as conditioned, includes the provision of 33.1 acres of open space and parks, and will pay fees to provide parks and recreation opportunities for the enjoyment and well-being of local residents (Policies LU-1.11, LU-12.7, LU-15.17 and LU-15.18).

C. Future residents would have the option of walking and bicycling to the Village 5 future trail system through Moore Road and future New Nelson Lane, which will connect to the City’s ultimate trail network. Therefore, the proposed Windsor Cove Project is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.6, LU-9.4, Goal T-5 and related policies that address bicycle and trail circulation (Transportation Element Policies T-5.6, T-5.7, T-5.9, and Open Space Element Policy OSC-7.20).

D. The proposed Windsor Cove Project preserves and protects existing biological resources including both wildlife and vegetative habitat (Policies OSC-1 and OSC-5 and LU-1.11) by preserving 33.1 acres, approximately 37 percent, of the project site as open space. In addition, the project shall comply with Chapter 18.69 of the City’s Zoning Code and the City of Lincoln Guidelines for Development around Oak Trees, as well as mitigation measures contained in the Village 5 EIR (Policy OSC-5.1).

E. The proposed Windsor Cove project provides significant buffer areas between the project and Auburn Ravine to protect and preserve existing natural edges and creek systems (Policies LU-1.4, LU-1.11, LU-12.4, and LU-12.7).

F. The plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and mitigation measures provided in the EIR to minimize drainage concentrations and impervious coverage (Policy PFS4.2). 446
G. The project will mitigate potential land use conflicts by providing larger parcels and building setbacks for lots adjacent to the rural residential uses in the County (Policy LU1.14).

Village 5 Specific Plan
The Village 5 Specific Plan is intended to direct the location and nature of development within the Specific Plan area, including the Windsor Cove Project site. The proposed Windsor Cove Project is consistent with the Village 5 Specific Plan as follows:

A. The Windsor Cove Project would develop residential uses in the VCE and VLDR zone, consistent with Chapter 4, Land Use Plan.

B. The Windsor Cove Project would provide frontage improvements to Moore Road and New Nelson Lane as specified in Chapter 5, Circulation Plan, of the Village 5 Specific Plan including a bike/NEV lane.

C. The Windsor Cove Project would provide open space and park acreage and pay fees toward development of parks consistent Chapter 6, Public Services, and Chapter 8, Resources and Sustainability.

D. The Windsor Cove Project would construct and connect to water, sewer and dry utilities systems and provide drainage facilities as required by Chapter 7, Public Utilities.

E. The project site supports and preserves special-status species habitat along Auburn Ravine. Consistent with Chapter 8, Resources & Sustainability, the proposed Windsor Cove Project would mitigate potential impacts on special-status species.

Land Use Designation Changes
The Village 5 Specific Plan allows for minor variations in land uses. The project complies with the adopted land use designations for the project site; however, there are modifications related to the land use acreages and locations as previous discussed. The Community Development Director has determined that the proposed revisions would not generate additional development and enhance the project’s design; therefore, the revisions are consistent with the goals, policies and intent of the General Plan and Village 5 Specific Plan.

Parks and Open Space
New development within Lincoln is required to provide both preserved open space and traditional parks. The Village 5 Specific Plan includes a total of 1,559 acres of open space and parks. In reviewing the appropriate amount of parkland within a development project located in Village 5, the City considers the amount of parkland anticipated in the Village 5 Specific Plan, the General Plan park standards, and the unique characteristics of the individual project.

The City of Lincoln General Plan establishes a standard of 3 acres of Neighborhood Park, 3 acres of open space and 3 acres of citywide parks per 1,000 residents within any project that is approved subject to a Development Agreement, which is required for this project.

The Village 5 Specific Plan establishes the household population (number of persons expected per household) for various residential densities. The assumed household population of low density residential development is 2.86 persons per household[1]. Given the project proposes to construct a maximum of 165 homes, it is assumed that the Windsor Cove project will have approximately 472 residents at build out. Therefore, the Windsor Cove project would be required to provide for acres 1.42 of open space, 1.42 acres of regional park and 1.42 acres of neighborhood park.

The project’s obligation for 1.42 acres of open space would be fully met through the 447
preservation of approximately 33.1 acres of open space on site.

The project’s obligation for 2.88 acres for neighborhood/community parks will be met through the development of approximately 1 acre of neighborhood parks on the project site and payment of park in-lieu (Quimby) fees, based on the credit received for the onsite facilities. As required by Mitigation Measure 3.14-4, these fees would off-set the cost of constructing or acquiring land for the Regional Sports Park anticipated within the Village 5 plan area.

Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
The proposed project was reviewed by the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) and City staff for compliance with the Lincoln Regional Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP). As previously mentioned, the proposed project is located within ALUCP Zones C1, C2, D and Wildlife Critical. Residential development is a compatible use within Zones C2, D and Wildlife Critical, and is a conditional use within Zone C1 related to density criteria. The project is consistent with the established density criteria. In addition, the project has provided additional open space area to serve as open land as defined in ALUCP Policy 3.4.10 for emergency landings.

Departmental Review and Conditions of Approval
The project has been reviewed by various affected city departments, including the Engineering Department and Fire Department. Based on this review, conditions of approval (COA) are being recommended for the project including requirements for submittal of required studies and plans, including a water study, storm water quality maintenance and operation plan, sanitary sewer report, soils report, erosion control program, a storm water quality plan, a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), landscaping plan, street lighting plan, and utility line sizing study. Requirements are provided for the design and timing of infrastructure improvements. The conditions of approval also include the requirement of compliance to the applicable mitigation measures from the adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program for the certified EIR. COAs are included as exhibits in the resolutions provided.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

In accordance with Government Code Section 65457(a) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan), any residential project meeting the development density or undertaken pursuant to and in conformity with a specific plan (e.g., Village 5 Specific Plan) adopted pursuant to Title 17, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8 of the Government Code is exempt from further environmental review. In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2) states that if a project falls within the scope of the project described in a Program EIR, and no subsequent environmental review would be required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, then no new environmental document is required.

The proposed Windsor Cove project is in conformance with the certified Final EIR for the Village 5 Specific Plan (SCH #2014052071) in respect to residential development (e.g., density, development standards, etc.). Therefore, no further environmental review is required.

Original applicable mitigation measures from the certified EIR shall be applied.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 Project Location
Attachment 2 Village 5 Land Use Plan
448
Attachment 3 Surrounding Specific Plans
Attachment 4 Airport Land Use Compatibility Map
Attachment 5 Land Use Comparison
Attachment 6 Project Layout
Attachment 7 Village 5 Planning Areas Map
Attachment 8 Windsor Cove GDPA Ordinance
Attachment 8 Windsor Cove GDPA Ordinance Exhibits
Attachment 9 Windsor Cove LLTSM Resolution
Attachment 9 Windsor Cove LLTSM Resolution Exhibits
Attachment 10 Windsor Cove SLTSM Resolution
Attachment 10 Windsor Cove SLTSM Resolution Exhibits.pdf 449
Moore Road
Ferrari Ranch Road
Nelson Lane
Fiddyment Road
Project
Site
Attachment 1: Project Location
450
Village 5 Specific Plan 4-2
CHAPTER 4-LAND USE PLAN
Exhibit 4.1: Land Use Plan
Attachment 2: Village 5 Land Use Plan 451
452
LINCOLN REGIONAL AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY POLICIES AND MAPS CHAPTER 4 Map LIN-6A
Compatibility Policy Map
Lincoln Regional Airport
(Adopted September 22, 2021)
Attachment 4 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Map
453

MOORE RD

20.8±AC
VLDR
VLDR

NELSON L
VCE
VOSP
VOSN

6.3±AC

8.88±AC 4.86±AC

44.08±AC

21.98±AC
VLDR
VCE
VOSP

MOORE RD
VLDR
197.

NELSON
VOSP
VOSN C-1
C-2
D
2 6
4 9
10 21
27 23
32 28
37 38
36 1
3 5
7 8
11 22
25 26
30 29
31 33
34 39 20
25 50
52 44
40 45
41 48
22 47
42 46
20 24
23 49
21 19
17 18
15 16
13 14
29 30
26 31
12 11
32 4 3
8685
C-2
10 9 8 5
83 75
51 6
27 28
7 17
1 18
19 2
84 87 88 89
82 80 79 7778 76
90 91
LSC 1
OS 1
(CITY)
81 92
16 12
14 35 24
43 OS 2 (CITY)
LSC 2
LSC 11
OS 7
LSC 5 LSC 8

NELSON LANE
PARK
39 38 37 36 35 34 33
40 41 42 43 44 45 46
53 52 51 50 49 48 47
54 55 56 57 58 59 60
67 66 65 64 63 62 61
68 69 70 71 72 73 74
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
VLDR 2
VCE 1
VCE 2
LSC 6
LSC 4
15 OS 3
(CITY)
LSC 9 LSC 10
LSC 3
OS 5

MOORE ROAD
(FUTURE FERRARI RANCH ROAD)
OS 4 OS 6
LSC 7
IOD 1
13 8 11 12 13 12 11 8 11
8 11 12 13 12 11 8 11
13 12 13 12 11
IOD 2
VLDR 1
I:\Drafting\21200-Moore_Road\Exhibits\COMPARISON LAND USE EXHIBIT.dwg, 05/18/26 06:53:24pm, amilan EXHIBIT FDG
N
W
S
E
0 200' 400' 600'
City of Lincoln, California 05-18-2026
Windsor Cove
Attachment 5: Land Use Comparison
CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING SCALE 1"=200'
(916) 782-3000 Phone
(916) 782-3955 Fax
1316 Blue Oaks Blvd
Roseville, CA 95678
SPA LAND USE VLDR: 20.04 AC Windsor Cove LAND USE
VCE: 26.39 AC
VPR: 0.97 AC
VOS: 32.17 AC
LSC: 4.16 AC
IOD/RW : 6.27 AC
TOTAL: 90.0± AC
VLDR: 21.77AC
VCE: 47.77 AC
VOS: 12.33 AC
RW : 6.48 AC
LSC: 1.65 AC
TOTAL: 90 ± AC
454

A LP A LP
2 6
4 9
10 21
27 23
32 28
37 38
36 1
3 5
7 8
11 22
25 26
30 29
31 33
34 39 20
25 50
52 44
40 45
41 48
22 47
42 46
20 24
23 49
21 19
1718
15 16
13 14
29 30
26 31
12 11
32 4
3 85 86
10 9
8 5
83 75
51 6
27 28
7 17
1 18
19 2
84 87 88 89
82 80 79 78 77 76
90 91
LSC 1
IOD 2
OS 1
(CITY)
81 92
B LP
B LP

B LP B LP
B LP
C ST
B ST
A LP
AA ST
16 12
14 35 24
43 OS 2 (CITY)
LSC 2
OS 7
LSC 5

NELSON LANE
A LP
PARK
39 38 37 36 35 34 33
40 41 42 43 44 45 46
53 52 51 50 49 48 47
54 55 56 57 58 59 60
67 66 65 64 63 62 61
68 69 70 71 72 73 74
93 94
95 96
97 98
99 100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109110
111
112
113
VLDR 2
VLDR 1
VCE 1
VCE 2
LSC 6
LSC 4
15 OS 3
(CITY)
LSC 9 LSC 10
LSC 3
OS 5
A LP
A LP
A ST

MOORE ROAD
(FUTURE FERRARI RANCH ROAD)
OS 4
OS 6
LSC 7
IOD 1
B ST
13 12 13 12
12 13 12 11
1 2 LINCOLN AIRPORT

LINCOLN AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY ZONES

LINCOLN AIRPORT

COMPATIBILITY ZONES

COMPATIBILITY ZONES
D
C1
LINCOLN AIRPORT C1
D
C2
C2
C1

D COMPATIBILITY ZONES

4.00 AC

18.44 AC

1.93 AC

5.34 AC

0.13 AC

0.49 AC

1.84 AC

0.97 AC
42 42
72 4
2 1
2 72
4 2
4 2
52 7
2 8
2 9
2 9
2 92
2 3
4 2
42 62
7 2
2 11
22 FDG
N
W
S
E
0 100' 200' 300'
City of Lincoln, California June 19, 2026
Windsor Cove
SCALE 1"=100'
Z:\Data (Team Folder)\Drafting\21200-Moore_Road\Tentative Map\21200_TM-01-Cover [VCE Shift.dwg, 06/19/26 05:27:57pm, RMclachlan SHT1 Cover Sheet Tentative Subdivision Map SHEET 1 OF 4

1. PARCEL LINES AND AREAS MAY BE ADJUSTED AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL MAP,

PROVIDED THE GENERAL LOTTING SCHEME IS PRESERVED AND NO NEW

ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL PARCELS ARE CREATED, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN. PROPOSED NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS MAY BE REDUCED AT TIME OF FINAL MAP.

2. PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 56456.1, THE SUBDIVIDER MAY FILE MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS BASED UPON THIS TENTATIVE MAP. THE FILING OF A FINALMAP ON A PORTION OF THIS TENTATIVE MAP SHALL NOT INVALIDATE ANY PART OF THIS TENTATIVE MAP.

3. THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS SHOWN ON THIS TENTATIVE MAP ARE TENTATIVE AND MAY BE MODIFIED TO FIT THE FINAL BUILDING DESIGN AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL MAP.

ANY LOT MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH THEAPPROVED TENTATIVE MAP AND MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIREMENTS.

4. ACCESS, PUBLIC UTILITY, AND LANDSCAPE AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT LOTS

SHOWN OR IMPLIED IN THIS TENTATIVE MAP ARE TENTATIVE AND MAY BE MODIFIED AT THE TIME OF THE FINAL MAP.

5. ALL UTILITY SYSTEMS ILLUSTRATED ON THIS TENTATIVE MAP ARE CONCEPTUAL AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT THE TIME OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS.

6. GRADING SHOWN ON THIS TENTATIVE MAP IS TENTATIVE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT THE TIME OF FINAL DESIGN OF GRADING PLANS.

7. PARK REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF LOTS SHOWN ON THE FINAL MAP.

8. MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS PER VILLAGE 5 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.9. ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT.

10. ALL NON-STANDARD ITEMS MUST BE JUSTIFIED AND MITIGATED FOR AND REQUIRE CITY-ENGINEER APPROVAL. IF NON-STANDARD ITEMS ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY

IDENTIFIED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP, THEY ARE SPECIFICALLY NOT APPROVED AND WILL REQUIRE FURTHER REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

NOTES:

APN: 021-050-011
APN: 021-050-001
APN: 021-049-009
APN: 021-049-003
APN: 021-049-004
APN: 021-049-005
APN: 021-049-006
APN: 021-049-007
APN: 021-028-007 APN: 021-028-003 (CITY OF LINCOLN)
APN: 021-049-002

FIDDYMENT ROAD
RAVINE
AUBURN

TENTATIVE MAP INFORMATION

DEVELOPER/
OWNER:

KUHN KIDS INVESTMENT, LLC
5701 LONE TREE BLVD. SUITE #102
ROCKLIN, CA 95765
ENGINEER/PLANNER:

FRAYJI DESIGN GROUP, INC.
1316 BLUE OAKS BLVD.

ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
(916) 782-3000

ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO.:

TOTAL ACREAGE: 90.0± AC
EXISTING ZONE: VLDR/VCE/OPEN SPACE/ROW
PROPOSED ZONE:
021-490-002

SERVICE PROVIDERS
SCHOOL DISTRICTS:

PARKS &RECREATION: CITY OF LINCOLNPOLICE &FIRE PROTECTION:

LINCOLN POLICE DEPT./LINCOLN FIRE DEPT.

SANITARY SEWER: CITY OF LINCOLN
DOMESTIC WATER: CITY OF LINCOLN
STORM DRAIN: CITY OF LINCOLN
ELECTRICITY: PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

TELEPHONE: AT&T
CABLE: WAVE COMMUNICATIONS / CABLE CO.

WESTERN PLACER UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT, K-12

VILLAGE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VLDR),VILLAGE COUNTRY ESTATES (VCE) (OPEN SPACE) (ROW)

SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT
LOT SUMMARY:PARK/OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPE CORRIDORS
DENSITY:

VLDR 1VLDR 2
TOTAL

DU ACRES

SMALL LOT TENTATIVE MAP
165 SINGLE FAMILY
5,233 S.F.
11,335 S.F.
5,914 S.F.

VLDR-SMALLEST:VLDR-LARGEST:VLDR-AVERAGE:
16,800 S.F.31,564 S.F.19,340 S.F.

VCE-SMALLEST:VCE-LARGEST:VCE-AVERAGE:

OS1/V5 SP-VOSP=OS2/V5 SP-VOSP=OS3/V5 SP-VOSP=OS4/V5 SP-VOSP=OS5/V5 SP-VOSP=OS6/V5 SP-VOSP=OS7/V5 SP-VOSP= PARK=

OS/PARK TOTAL
LSC1 =LSC2 =LSC3 =LSC4 =LSC5 =LSC6 =LSC7 =LSC8 =LSC 9 =LSC 10 =LSC 11 =

0.74 AC0.60 AC0.43 AC0.76 AC0.63 AC0.04 AC0.02 AC0.47 AC0.05 AC0.05 AC0.37 AC

4.16 AC LSC TOTAL
IOD 1=IOD 2=

FUTURE NELSON LANE & MOORE ROAD/FUTURE FERRARI RANCH ROAD

1.78 AC4.49 AC

6.27 AC IOD TOTAL

THE BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON THE LEGALDESCRIPTION AS DESCRIBED IN THE PRELIMINARY REPORT NUMBER P-652474 BY PLACER TITLE COMPANY DATED
DECEMBER 11, 2024. ALL EASEMENTS SHOWN IN THE REPORT

ARE SHOWN HEREON OR IF AN EASEMENT IS NOT PLOTABLE OR
BLANKET, A NOTE TO THAT AFFECT IS SHOWN HEREON. ANYPUBLIC EASEMENTS TO BE ABANDONED ARE SHOWN AS "TO BE ABANDONED WITH THE FINAL MAP".

SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

PARKWAY
3rd ST.

MOORE ROAD

NELSON LANE

FIDDYMENT
HWY 65

VICINITY MAP
NTS
JOINER

LINCOLN

REGIONAL

AIRPORT
ROAD

NICOLAUSROAD
VILLAGE 7
VILLAGE 5
Windsor
Cove
HWY 65

CITY OF

LINCOLN

CROSSING
WWTP

MOORE ROAD
AUBURN
RAVINE
VCE 1VCE 2
TOTAL

DU ACRES

DENISTYDENISTY
45 68
113
2626
52 13.17

13.22 26.39

8.11 11.93

20.04 5.64 DU/AC

1.97 DU/AC

4.00 AC

18.44 AC

1.93 AC5.34 AC0.13 AC0.49 AC1.84 AC0.97 AC

33.14 AC
Attachment
6: Project Layout
455
Village 5 Specific Plan 2-4
CHAPTER 2: CONTEXT
Exhibit 2.3: Planning Areas
Attachment 7 Village 5 Planning Areas Map
456
Ordinance No.

Page 1 of 4 ends

ORDINANCE XXXXB

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE VILLAGE 5 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE WINDSOR COVE PROJECT (AREA J1)
WHEREAS, Title 18, Chapter 18.32 of the Lincoln Municipal Code provides for the review by the City of Lincoln City Council on all General Development Plans and amendments of General Development Plans; and
WHEREAS, on December 5, 2017, the Lincoln City Council adopted Resolution No. 2017- 258, making findings concerning mitigation measures and alternatives, making a statement of overriding considerations, adopting a Mitigation Monitoring Plan, and certifying the Village 5 Specific Plan Project Final Environmental Impact Report (“Village 5 Final EIR”) SCH No. 2014052071 pursuant to CEQA; and
WHEREAS, on the City of Lincoln adopted Ordinance No. 960B on December 5, 2017, approving the Village 5 Project General Development Plan; and WHEREAS, amendments to the adopted Village 5 General Development Plan have been proposed, including new design criteria for the development of the Project; and WHEREAS, notices describing the proposed Project and the time and place of the Planning Commission hearing, including a general explanation of the matter to be considered was published in a newspaper of local circulation and sent to neighboring property owners pursuant to Section 18.92 of the Lincoln Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental Guidelines of the City of Lincoln, notice is hereby given that the City of Lincoln located at 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln, California has determined that the project is exempt under CEQA Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified. The proposed project qualifies for this exemption as it is consistent with the certified Village 5 Specific Plan EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2014052071) and applicable mitigation measures of the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Plan. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2026, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and, following discussion and public testimony, held votes to adopt resolutions recommending City Council to do the following: determine the Project would not result in any new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the Village 5 Final EIR; approve the amended Village 5 General Development Plan, and approve tentative maps in association with the Windsor Cove Project; and
457
Ordinance No.

Page 2 of 4 ends

WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed and considered information contained in the EIR, and finds that the mitigation measures identified therein, imposed on and incorporated by reference into the Village 5 Specific Plan Project, will lessen the significant effects of the amendments; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Amendment to the Village 5 General Development Plan and conducted a public hearing on July 28, 2026.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN does ordain as follows:

Section 1. This Ordinance incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, that certain Exhibit B specifying the Amendments to the Village 5 General Development Plan, on file with the Community Development Director relative to the Windsor Cove Project.

Section 2. General Development Plan Findings. The City Council finds and determines that:
a. The Amendments to the Village 5 General Development Plan are consistent with the March 2008 General Plan, as amended by Resolution No. 2012-197 and proposed Resolution No. 2013-022 (the “General Plan Amendment Resolution”) and is also consistent with the proposed Village 5 Specific Plan (the “Specific Plan”), and proposed amendment thereto, because the General Development Plan with the proposed amendment (“Amended General Development Plan”) establishes zoning districts and development standards for land uses which are allowed by the General Plan and Specific Plan land use designations and the policies for new residential, commercial and open space land uses which apply to the Village 5 property. Specifically, the Amended General Development Plan allows for low density residential, medium density residential and high density residential, mixed-use commercial, public, parks and recreation and open space land use designations. The Amended General Development Plan provides a master development plan and specific development standards for residential and non-residential land uses within the Specific Plan area. b. The Amended Village 5 General Development Plan is consistent with the General Plan because the zoning districts provide for the following land use districts which are allowed by the General Plan Land Use designations as Village Country Estates, Village Low Density Residential, Village Medium Density Residential and Village High Density Residential.

Additionally, the Amended General Development Plan includes open space which is consistent with General Plan open space requirements.
c. The Amended Village 5 General Development Plan is consistent with the City’s Zoning Ordinance because it has been prepared pursuant to and for implementation of the Village 5 Specific Plan Area to specify the uses, the locations of such uses, and the governing development standards and design guidelines for the development of a master planned community. The General Development Plan is also consistent with the City’s Zoning Ordinance 458
Ordinance No.

Page 3 of 4 ends

because it consists of a map and text showing all uses, intensity of land use as measured by units per acre and area coverage; major circulation and development phases. d. The Amended Village 5 General Development Plan is consistent with the requirements of the Planned Development District zone of the City’s Zoning Ordinance which governs the Village 5 property because it has been designed to provide for a creative, more flexible and orderly approach to the use of land.

Section 3. The proposed Amendment to the Village 5 General Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated by this reference, is subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

Section 4. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, and the evidence in the Staff Report, the City Council hereby approves the Amendment to the Village 5 General Development Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit B, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director.

Section 5. Severability. If any section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted the Ordinance and each section, sub-section, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, sub-sections, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions to be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 6. Publication. Within fifteen days of passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause the full text of the Ordinance, with the names of those City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Lincoln News Messenger. In lieu of publishing the full text of the Ordinance, the City Clerk, if so directed by the City Attorney and within fifteen days, shall cause a summary of the Ordinance, prepared by the City Attorney and with the names of the City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance, to be published in the Lincoln News Messenger, and shall post in the office of the City Clerk a certified copy of the City Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance. The publication of a summary of the Ordinance in lieu of the full text of the Ordinance is authorized only where the requirements of Government Code § 36933(c)(1) are met.

INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lincoln held on July 28, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
459
Ordinance No.

Page 4 of 4 ends

_____
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
Exhibits:

A. Conditions of Approval
B. Village 5 General Development Plan Amended Pages
460

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The Amended Village 5 General Development Plan for the Village 5 Specific Plan is recommended for approval subject to the following conditions:

1. All property within the Amended Village 5 General Development Plan Area shall be subject to the applicable mitigation measures adopted as part of the certified Village 5 Specific Plan Project EIR (SCH No. 2014052071).

2. The General Development Plan provides for various design criteria related to the Village 5 Specific Plan development. In the event of any conflicts between the standards set forth in the General Development Plan and those adopted by the City in its Design Criteria & Procedures Manual (the “Public Improvement Standards”), the standards set forth in the General Development Plan as amended shall control, except in cases where there are no standards set forth in the General Development Plan, in which case the Public Improvement Standards will control.

3. Further entitlement applications and permits will be required for all parcels when a specific parcel is proposed for development. The applicant will be required to file a formal application for review and approval by the City for the specific parcel(s) in question. When considering the approval of any proposed entitlement requests, the City shall conduct its review consistent with the Amended General Development Plan and Public Improvement Standards.

4. The ability to proceed under any approvals, entitlements, or authorizations granted by this action are contingent upon a Development Agreement being executed with the City of Lincoln specifying the terms and conditions of financing public improvements, conditions of development and reimbursement matters. The City Council shall have complete discretion to approve the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement and will not be bound by any provisions adopted as part of this resolution. Where any conflict exists between these conditions of approval and the Development Agreement, the terms of the Development Agreement will control.

Attachment 8 Exhibit A
461
VILLAGE 5 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
ADOPTED JANUARY 9, 2018
ORDINANCE 960B
EIR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2014052071
Lead Agency:

City of Lincoln
600 Sixth Street
Lincoln, CA 95648
Prepared for:

Richland Developers
3000 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 115
Roseville, CA 95661
Amended ...............

Attachment 8 Exhibit B
462

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
iii
CHAPTER 6: Village Landscape Design Guidelines

6.1 Overview .................................................................................................................... 6-1

6.2 Open Space ................................................................................................................ 6-1

6.2.1 Preservation and Mitigation ................................................................................................... 6-1

6.2.2 Buffer Areas ............................................................................................................................. 6-1

6.2.3 Riparian Protection ................................................................................................................. 6-2

6.2.4 Trails, Crossings and Connections ......................................................................................... 6-2

6.2.5 Hierarchy of Travel Ways ....................................................................................................... 6-2

6.2.6 Bio Retention ............................................................................................................................ 6-2

6.2.7 Bio Swales ................................................................................................................................. 6-3

6.2.8 Natural and Created Open Space ........................................................................................... 6-4

6.2.9 Multi-Use Landscape Corridors ............................................................................................. 6-5

6.2.10 Connectivity ............................................................................................................................ 6-5

6.3 Parks ...........................................................................................................................6-5

6.3.1 Park Framework ...................................................................................................................... 6-5

6.4 Schools ........................................................................................................................6-6

6.4.1 Co-Location Partnering .......................................................................................................... 6-6

6.4.2 Safe School Routes ................................................................................................................... 6-6

6.5 Streetscapes and Entries ...........................................................................................6-7

6.5.1 General Guidelines .................................................................................................................. 6-7

6.5.2 Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety ................................................................................................. 6-7

6.6 Entryway Monumentation ......................................................................................6-7

6.6.1 Hierarchy of Locations ........................................................................................................... 6-7

6.6.2 General Entry Design Guidelines ........................................................................................... 6-7

6.7 Off Street Parking .....................................................................................................6-8

6.7.1 Locations ................................................................................................................................... 6-8

6.7.2 Pedestrian Access ..................................................................................................................... 6-8

6.7.3 Design ........................................................................................................................................ 6-8

6.8 General Landscape Concepts .................................................................................. 6-9

6.8.1 Community Landscape Concepts ........................................................................................... 6-9

6.8.2 Common Area Guidelines ..................................................................................................... 6-11

6.8.3 Residential Landscape Guidelines ........................................................................................ 6-11

6.8.4 Residential Landscape Criteria ............................................................................................ 6-12

6.9 Water Conservation .............................................................................................. 6-15

6.9.1 Water Calculations ................................................................................................................ 6-15

6.9.2 Reclaimed Water System ...................................................................................................... 6-15

6.9.3 Xeriscaping ............................................................................................................................. 6-15

6.10 Fire Protection Measures .................................................................................... 6-15

6.11 General Hardscape Criteria ................................................................................ 6-16

6.11.1 Enhanced Paving .................................................................................................................. 6-16

6.11.2 Location and Durability ...................................................................................................... 6-16

6.11.3 Decorative Paving ................................................................................................................ 6-16

6.11.4 Permeable Paving ................................................................................................................. 6-16

6.11.5 Trails and Paths ................................................................................................................... 6-16

6.12 Walls and Fencing ................................................................................................ 6-17

6.13 Construction Techniques and Materials ............................................................ 6-18

6.14 Lighting.................................................................................................................. 6-19

6.15 Signage ................................................................................................................... 6-20

6.16 Plant Palettes ........................................................................................................ 6-22 CHAPTER 7: Area A1, A2, and J1 Planning Level Detail

7.1 Overview .................................................................................................................... 7-1

7.2 Community Design Features ................................................................................... 7-3

7.3 Neighborhood Design Intent.................................................................................... 7-5

7.4 Mobility Plan ........................................................................................................... 7-15 Attachment 8 Exhibit B
463

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
iv

7.5 Parks and Recreation Opportunities ....................................................................7-18

7.5.1 Conceptual Landscape Master Plan .................................................................................... 7-19

7.6 Streetscape Design...................................................................................................7-24

7.7 Community Signage ................................................................................................7-27

7.8 Walls and Fences .....................................................................................................7-33

7.9 Street Lighting .........................................................................................................7-36

7.10 Landscape Edges and Transitions ......................................................................7-37 CHAPTERS 8-16: Future Chapters for Planning Level Detail Areas B-J List of Exhibits and Tables

1.1 Land Use Plan Exhibit ..................................................................................................................... 1-2

1.1 Planning Areas Exhibit.................................................................................................................... 1-3 Table 3.1 Permitted Uses ....................................................................................................................... 3-4 Table 3.2 VRR, VCE and VLDR Development Standards ................................................................ 3-7 Exhibit 3.1 Setback Diagrams for VRR, VCE and VLDR ................................................................. 3-8 Table 3.3 VMDR Development Standards .......................................................................................... 3-9 Exhibit 3.2 Setback Diagrams for VMDR ......................................................................................... 3-10 Table 3.4 VHDR Development Standards ......................................................................................... 3-12 Exhibit 3.3 Setback Diagrams for VHDR .......................................................................................... 3-13 Table 3.5 VMU Development Standards ........................................................................................... 3-14 Exhibit 3.4 Ilustration of Standards for VMU and VC 151 ............................................................. 3-15 Table 3.6 VC Development Standards ............................................................................................... 3-15 Exhibit 3.5 Illustration of Standards for VC Parcel 171 .................................................................. 3-16 Table 3.7 VCOMM Development Standards .................................................................................... 3-17 Exhibit 3.6 Illustration of Standards for VCOMM .......................................................................... 3-17 Table 3.8 VOC Development Standards ............................................................................................ 3-18 Exhibit 3.7 Illustration of Standards for VOC .................................................................................. 3-18 Table 3.9 VBP Development Standards ............................................................................................. 3-19 Exhibit 3.8 Illustration of Standards for VBP................................................................................... 3-19 Table 3.10 Parks Development Standards ......................................................................................... 3-20 Exhibit 3.9 Illustration of Standards for Park .................................................................................. 3-21 Table 3.11 AO Development Standards ............................................................................................. 3-22 Exhibit 7.1 Area A1, A2, and J1 Land Use Plan ................................................................................. 7-2 Exhibit 7.2 Development Pattern Plan ................................................................................................. 7-3 Exhibit 7.3 Parks and Open Space Plan .............................................................................................. 7-4 Exhibit 7.4 Neighborhood Boundaries ................................................................................................. 7-5 Exhibit 7.5 Roadway Plan ................................................................................................................... 7-15 Exhibit 7.6 Pedestrian and Bikeway Plan .......................................................................................... 7-16 Exhibit 7.7 Parks and Open Space Identifying Plan ........................................................................ 7-18 Exhibit 7.8 Conceptual Landscape Master Plan ............................................................................... 7-19 Exhibit 7.9 Street Tree Plan ................................................................................................................ 7-25 Exhibit 7.10 Community Signage Plan .............................................................................................. 7-27 Exhibit 7.11 Open Space Signage ....................................................................................................... 7-32 Exhibit 7.12 Community Wall and Fence Locations ........................................................................ 7-33 Exhibit 7.13 Street Lighting Plan ....................................................................................................... 7-36 Attachment 8 Exhibit B
464
CHAPTER 7: AREA A1, A2, AND J1 PLANNING LEVEL DETAIL
Village 5 GDP 7-1
CHAPTER 7: Area A1 and A2 Planning Level Detail

7.1 OVERVIEW
Purpose
The purpose of this section is to describe and clarify how each site area is to be used and how the planning, architecture and landscape design will cohesively complement one another. This Area specific section describes and illustrates concepts to insure that the quality and character of each neighborhood development is meeting with the vision intended. The Planning Level Detail addresses the street network, bike paths, pedestrian trails and the overall connectivity between the various land uses. The framework is based on the development standards found in Chapter 3 and the spirit of the vision is defined by the residential, commercial and landscape design guidelines found in Chapters 4, 5 and 6 respectively.

Executing the Vision
The Village 5 Specific Plan clearly describes the vision and principles that will make up the foundation for this development. The desired features of strong connectivity, efficient development patterns, a variety of development offerings, and transportation choices all in a diverse, high quality in all aspects to insure a healthy and valued community for generations. This Chapter defines and illustrates in greater detail community elements including: development patterns, the mobility network, parks and open space amenities, neighborhood areas and features, streetscape designs, monumentation, lighting, signage and landscape transitions. Each element includes specific criteria to be followed for this area of development.

Details
All power and utilities within Village 5 will be constructed underground.

Organization
This section is organized by detailing each element of the vision, as noted above, and providing specific details and examples for execution.

Illustrative Land Use Summary for Planning Area A1, A2, and J1 Areas A1, A2, and J1 land use is consistent with the Village 5 Specific Plan zoning designations. The enclosed table summarizes the various uses, acreage and total units anticipated, however the final lot layouts are still being developed thus final unit counts may vary. Please see Table B-1 in the Specific Plan Appendix B for additional detail. Please see Area Land Use Plan on the following page.

Land Use Acreage Units
Residential
VCE Country Estates 250.9 1436.0
VLDR Low Density Residential 199.7 1050.0
VMDR Medium Density Residential 50.1 96.0
VLDR Community Recreation 6.3 0.0
VLDR Senior Recreation 5.4 0.0
Subtotal 512.4 2582.0
Commercial
VCOMM Village Commercial 79.5
VC Village Center 26.4
Subtotal 105.9
Public
ES Elementary School 12.0
PQP Public/Quasi-Public 3.9
ROW Major Roadways 74.6
Subtotal 90.5
Open Space/Parks
VRP Village Regional Park 71.2
VCP Village Community Park 16.0
VNP Village Neighborhood Park(s) 14.3
VLP Village Linear Park(s) 14.0
VPP Village Pocket Park(s) 5.1
VOSN Village Open Space Natural 49.3
Subtotal 169.9
TOTAL 878.7 2582.0
Attachment 8 Exhibit B
465
CHAPTER 7: AREA A1, A2, AND J1 PLANNING LEVEL DETAIL
Village 5 GDP 7-2
Exhibit 7.1

VLDR VCE
VNP
, INCLUDING AREA J1
Attachment 8 Exhibit B
466
CHAPTER 7: AREA A1, A2, AND J1 PLANNING LEVEL DETAIL
Village 5 GDP 7-5

7.3 NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN INTENT
Rachel Avenue is the heart and spirit of Village 5. Incorporating Village Commercial at both ends, and a wide variety of residential opportunities in between. This tree lined gateway is designed with a large center median, two vehicular lanes, a Class I cycle track on the north, and separated walkways on both sides (no parking) thus defining it as a primary connection both physically and aesthetically Rachel will capture the iconic rural spirit of traditional Lincoln while bringing highly articulated architectural designs that embrace today’s styles. Rachel will consist of predominately alley loaded homes with vehicular access at the rear, while offering a variety of lot widths and alternatively some side facing residents too. By featuring front doors and porches at the street a sense of community is established. This key link has three primary focal points including two roundabouts, and a bridge. The roundabouts define the primary entrances into each of the neighborhoods to the north and south, while the bridge gives long linear views in each direction ultimately connecting the village community park on the south with the village regional park at the north. This area’s neighborhoods are centered on the “Main Street” theme of Rachel Avenue.

Notes:

All street names will be submitted and finalized during the tentative map process.

Exhibit 7.4
•
VCE

VLDR VCE
VPN
VOS
Attachment 8 Exhibit B
467
CHAPTER 7: AREA A1, A2, AND J1 PLANNING LEVEL DETAIL
Village 5 GDP 7-14a
Neighborhood VII
The Neighborhood VII design principles and features are as follows:
- Neighborhood VII boundaries can be described as approximately 55 acres south of Auburn Ravine open space, North of Moore Road and bound by Nelson Lane to the west and rural land to the east. - The primary entrances are off of Moore Road.
- The development pattern consists of 2 entrances to Moore Road with alooped road between the .

Villages and the trail in between for mobility.
- This neighborhood consists of low density residential and country estates. All lots backing to open open space will feature an open view fence.
- This neighborhood will have a small neighborhood park for use by the residents. - The low density residential village will have a patch across to the Nelson Lane walkway.

VLDR VCE

NELSON LANE

MOORE ROAD

OPEN SPACE
VNP
Attachment 8 Exhibit B
468
CHAPTER 7: AREA A1, A2, AND J1 PLANNING LEVEL DETAIL
Village 5 GDP 7-18

7.5 PARKS AND RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES
Village 5 – Areas A1 and A2 feature Recreation Facilities, extensive Park Facilities and access to Open Space Trails that are inner connected in a way that everyone with in these Areas have quality outdoor amenities. All parks are accessible via walking or bicycle but parking is available. 170 acres are dedicated to park and recreation amenities while an additional 200 acres of open space and its trail system is also available.
- The trail system within the A1, A2, and J1 Planning Area will consist, at a minimum, of 1 mile of trails for every 2500 people. - Community Recreation Facilities, and Multi-family facilities shall incorporate swimming pools as a portion of their
recreational amenity. There shall be a minimum of one pool for every 10,000 residents.

Exhibit 7.7
- Area J1, Villages 1-2 will have 1500 LF of trails internally that connects to the park within the Village and from the park pathway to access the Nelson Lane walkway.

VLDR VCE
VNP
VOS
Attachment 8 Exhibit B
469
CHAPTER 7: AREA A1, A2, AND J1 PLANNING LEVEL DETAIL
Village 5 GDP 7-19

7.5.1 Conceptual Landscape Master Plan
The purpose of the Landscape Master Plan is to graphically represent areas of significant landscape treatments, which will be described in detail in the following chapter of the Landscape Design Guideline Document.

The Conceptual Landscape Master Plan is shown below.

Exhibit 7.8

VLDR VCE
PARK
Attachment 8 Exhibit B
470
CHAPTER 7: AREA A1, A2, AND J1 PLANNING LEVEL DETAIL
Village 5 GDP 7-27

7.7 COMMUNITY SIGNAGE
Monumentation and neighborhood entry features shall be designed, at the tentative map phase, to embrace the characteristics of the vision and established quality standard for the Community. Substantial materials rooted from the area are desirable to highlight the cultural history of Lincoln. The various features should complement one another and be harmonious while maintaining hierarchical distinction. Landscaping shall be thoughtfully considered so as to enhance these community features and never block them.

PRIMARY GATEWAY MONUMENTATION
Located at the intersection of Nelson Lane and Rachel Avenue, this grand feature will be the Gateway to Village 5 Area A1 and A2, and will be the largest scale monument feature. The focus directs residents and visitors along the signature street of the Village, which will immediately capture their attention in its feel and function.
•
•
•
•

SECONDARY COMMUNITY MONUMENTATION
These intersections are located at Nelson Lane and Mavis Avenue and additionally at the intersection of the North/South Collector and Mavis Avenue. This secondary feature still draws significant importance and attention to the planning area and helps guide and set the tone for the community theme. This will be a step down in size but will have a strong vertical presence.

NEIGHBORHOOD MONUMENTATION
Located at key entrances these features announce the arrival of each neighborhood while continuing the theming established.

This monumentation will be scaled down to proportionately transition into the neighborhood scale.

FEATURE MONUMENTATION
These special monuments are for the purposes of identifying each of the community amenities and feature elements. All Parks, and Recreation Facilities will have monuments, but these will be the smallest in the hierarchy. Exhibit 7.10

VLDR VCE
VNP
VOS
Attachment 8 Exhibit B
471
CHAPTER 7: AREA A1, A2, AND J1 PLANNING LEVEL DETAIL
Village 5 GDP 7-33

7.8 WALLS AND FENCES
Walls and fences shall be designed and constructed according to the specifications noted below. Each wall type is described below denoted on the corresponding plan for easy reference. See Chapter 6: Landscape Design Guidelines, pages 6-28 and 6-29 for typical images of fencing examples.

Community Wall and Courtyard Patio Wall Designs
Block wall designs shall be constructed of CMU block with stucco over and a brick cap.

Pilasters shall match wall design and be spaced at a maximum of 100’ O.C. and as needed for grade or direction changes.

Per the monumentation diagrams in section 7.7 varied heights should be combined with pilasters for an aesthetically pleasing look and scaled appropriately for the location and purpose it serves.

Townhomes shall consist of 4’-0” tall CMU walls with stucco over and 2’-0” tall tubular steel for a total height of 6’-0”. Pilasters to be constructed where Post and Cable Design (at Open Space)
Provide 3’-0” tall, 6”x6” square pressure treated posts at 15’-0” O.C. typical with (2) 3/8” diameter #7 galvanized wire cable spaced at 16” O.C. vertically.

Provide openings every 750 ft. to allow for emergency access.

Open View Fencing Design (at View Lots)
Provide 6’-0” tall, 2”x 2” tubular steel posts (with cap) with 3/4”x 3/4” steel pickets, 4” O.C. with a 1”x1” top and bottom rail.

Tubular steel fencing shall be painted black.

Wire Mesh Fence Design (at Schools)
Provide 6’-0” tall, green or black vinyl coated chain link fence with 9 gauge x 2”x 2” mesh between 4” steel posts spaced 8’-0” O.C. with a 1 5/8”x 1 5/8” galvanized top and bottom rail
Residential Good Neighbor Fencing (at Homes)
Provide 6’-0” tall, wood fence with a minimum #2 grade lumber 1”x 6” slats between 4”x4” pressure treated posts with 1”x 6” pressure treated fascia rail, mid-rail and bottom rail. Provide 2x4 pressure treated cap. Alternating panels shall be constructed between neighboring lots and all mid rail supports shall be internal to yards at all corner lots.

Exhibit 7.12

VLDR VCE
VNP
VOS
Attachment 8 Exhibit B
472
CHAPTER 7: AREA A1, A2, AND J1 PLANNING LEVEL DETAIL
Village 5 GDP 7-36

7.9 STREET LIGHTING
Street Lighting
Lighting is an essential element for any development. The most important element is for safety and secondarily aesthetic. An additional goal for this projects lighting is to provide attractive lighting with minimal contribution to light pollution. Each area will have different lighting needs. The Village Center will demand higher levels of light, while natural areas will require lower light levels.

Lighting shall be thematic (see diagram on following page) with a rural feel to reflect the historic essence in the overall design.

Fixtures shall be scaled appropriately for their specific location. Larger roadways will demand taller, dual fixtures and internal residential roads will be lower and have single fixtures and wider intervals as noted in our fixture diagram.

Standard illumination requirements on roadways shall apply so that drivers can clearly see all road alignments, traffic control signage and any potential obstacles. Higher light levels are expected at any intersection or for unique
interchanges.

Street lighting shall conform to the City of Lincoln’s standards for roadway illumination for public streets.

Spacing of all fixtures will be determined based on the type of street, or area use to insure a safety.

Walkways, paseos and other pathways with public access
shall be lit to provide safe passage, and minimize shadows.

Bollard lighting may be utilized or extra lighting at steps, ramps or other potential obstacles that would benefit from additional lighting.

Parking and vehicular areas should be consistent with the adjacent street fixtures and meet the City of Lincoln’s requirements for parking areas.

The addition of decorative features such as seasonal banners along Mavis Avenue and flower baskets shall be incorporated along Rachel Avenue. Both elements will be utilized as
appropriate at the Village Center.

See below for proposed light standards and Chapter 6 for additional examples of lighting imagery. Exhibit 7.13
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

VLDR VCE
VNP
VOS
Attachment 8 Exhibit B
473
Resolution No. 2026-

Page 1 of 4 ends

RESOLUTION 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING THE LARGE LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE WINDSOR COVE PROJECT (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 021-490-002-000) (APPLICANT: RON SMITH / PROPERTY OWNER: KUHN KIDS

INVESTMENT LLC)
WHEREAS, Title 17, Chapter 17.04 et seq. of the Lincoln Municipal Code provides for the review and recommendations of the City Council on all Tentative Maps; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2026, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered Windsor Cove the Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, and recommended approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, notices describing the proposed Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project were sent to neighboring property owners pursuant to the Lincoln Municipal Code Section 17.16.150 and notice of the hearing was published in accordance with Section 6061 of the Government Code in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the City of Lincoln at least ten calendar days before the City Council’s public hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental Guidelines of the City of Lincoln, notice is hereby given that the City of Lincoln located at 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln, California has determined that the project is exempt under CEQA Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified. The proposed project qualifies for this exemption as it is consistent with the certified Village 5 Specific Plan EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2014052071) and applicable mitigation measures of the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Plan. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project and conducted a public hearing.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. This Resolution incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, that certain Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director, relative to the proposed development of the Windsor Cove Project on certain real property consisting of 90 acres located in Village 5 (APN 021-490-002-000), which is part of the Village 5 Specific Plan area and within the incorporated area of the City of Lincoln.
474
Resolution No. 2026-

Page 2 of 4 ends

Section 2. Pursuant to Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows:
a. The Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project is consistent with the Lincoln General Plan and the Village 5 Specific Plan because the Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map provides for the subdivision of the plan area in preparation of development in accordance with the General Plan land use designations. Consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and the Village 5 Specific Plan, the specific large lots are identified for Village Rural Residential (VRR) and Village Low Density Residential (VLDR) that will help meet the City's housing needs for projected future growth. This planned development will be supported by adequate public services and utilities. b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision of the Windsor Cove Project is consistent with the General Plan and Village 5 Specific Plan because adequate infrastructure and services will be extended to the property and available to serve the demand for services generated by the residential development, including water, sanitary sewer, storm drain facilities, dry utilities and roadways. The Developer will work with the Police Department to ensure adequate security measures are incorporated into the Project. The Developer will install fire protection measures and emergency access in accordance with the City's standards. c. The site is physically suitable for the types of development proposed for the Windsor Cove Project because the proposed lot configuration is designed to avoid sensitive vegetation and wildlife resources. An erosion control plan, a complete drainage system plan, and a water quality control plan shall be prepared and incorporate National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") requirements to protect water quality. The proposed subdivision will include adequately sized and properly aligned culverts at all drainage crossings in accordance with City standards to prevent blockage of high flows and associated erosion. Each phase of project construction will address 100-year and 200-year flood conditions as appropriate. With respect to sensitive vegetation and wildlife resources, extensive open space and habitat areas are included in the Project and will be preserved and maintained to avoid or mitigate impacts to such resources.
d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development as discussed in Finding c. above.
e. Pursuant to the requirements of the Central Valley Flood Protection Act of 2008, the City Council finds that the property is located within a watershed with a contributing area of 10 or fewer square miles, as determined by the City.
f. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife 475
Resolution No. 2026-

Page 3 of 4 ends

or their habitat because potential Windsor Cove Project impacts related to the environment will be mitigated to less-than-significant levels, where feasible, in addition to other specific measures set forth above in Finding c.
g. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems since water, sewer, police, fire and solid waste services will be adequately provided to the development.
h. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through our use of property within the proposed subdivision. Adequate open space is located immediately adjacent to the residential development and will be accessible to the public.
i. The Windsor Cove Project area is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965.

Section 3. The Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project is subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

These conditions support the findings made by this City Council set forth herein.

Section 4. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, and evidence in the Staff Report, the City Council hereby approves the Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project, attached hereto as Exhibit C, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director, subject to the attached exhibits.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
476
Resolution No. 2026-

Page 4 of 4 ends

Exhibits:

A. Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval B. Village 5 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
C. Windsor Cove Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, dated June 19, 2026 477
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 1 of 4 ends

The Windsor Cove Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map is located within Village 5 Specific Plan Area, north east of the intersection of Fiddyment Road and Moore Road within the City of Lincoln, Assessor’s Parcel Number 021-490-002, is approved subject to the following conditions of approval:
* (Single Asterisk) located in front of the Condition is a Modified Standard Condition ** (Double Asterisk) located in front indicates a New Condition Specific to the Windsor Cove Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. The Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its Council Members, its Planning Commission, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for any award, damages, costs and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to any plaintiff in an action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation related to approval of this permit. Applicant further agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such action.

General
Condition
Community
Development

2. The Applicant shall pay the City’s actual costs of providing entitlement processing Plan review, Final Map review, GIS, administrative fee, and inspection services. This may be a combination of staff costs and direct billing for contract professional services.

General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

3. All development within the Windsor Cove Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map is subject to compliance with applicable Mitigation Measures contained within Village 5 Specific Plan EIR and Final Supplemental EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2014052071).

General
Condition
Community
Development

4. The Windsor Cove Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map shall be subject to those provisions set forth in the approved Village 5 Specific Plan and General Development Plan.

General
Condition
Community
Development
Attachment 9
478
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 2 of 4 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

5. ** The following notes shall be included on the Final Large Lot Map:
“No residential subdivision (as contemplated in the Village 5 Specific Plan) is associated with this tentative subdivision map. Separate development permits and small lot subdivision map shall be required prior to any development with the exception of a single-family dwelling on 3440 Moore Road and other ancillary structures as allowed per the Village 5 GDP on any parcel within the parcel map boundary.”
General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

6. The Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map approval is valid for four (4) years from the date of City Council approval, unless an extension of time is subsequently approved per Government Code Section 66452.6(e), or extended by the terms of a Development Agreement.

General
Condition
Community
Development

7. The conditions of approval for the Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map dated June 1, 2026, supersede any and all conflicting notations and information which may be shown on said Maps.

General
Condition
Community
Development

FINAL MAP

8. A Note shall be placed on the Large Lot Final Map as follows: “A grading permit shall be required prior to any work on any parcel.”
Prior to Large
Lot Final Map
Approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

9. A Note shall be placed on the Large Lot Final Map as follows: “No building permit is proposed within this minor subdivision. Development of the large lot parcels is subject to Lincoln Subdivision Ordinance, Title 17.”
Prior to Large
Lot Final Map
Approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
Attachment 9
479
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 3 of 4 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

10. Arrangements shall be made by the Applicant during the review of Final Maps by the City for the abandonment of any existing easements and/or right-of-way no longer required, as well as arrangements for the dedication of new easements and/or right-of-way required to carry out project conditions of approval. Separate document easements required by the City shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and submitted for review by the City Surveyor, Community Development Department and City Engineer.

Abandonment of public easements/right of way require a formal determination of Findings of Consistency with the City’s General Plan pursuant CA Government Code Section 65402 from the Planning Commission.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

11. ** Owner shall dedicate all required public street and public service easements with the final large lot map or by separate instrument if such public street & public service easements are dedicated prior to the recordation of the final map. Arrangements shall be made by the Applicant during the review of Final Maps by the City for the abandonment of any existing easements and/or right-of-way no longer required within the backbone roadways or within any lot or easement that is to be granted to the City, as well as arrangements for the dedication of new easements and/or rights-or-way required to carry out project conditions of approval. Separate document easements required by the City shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and submitted for review by the City Surveyor, Community Development Department and City Engineer.

Prior to Large
Lot Final Map
Approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

12. The ability to proceed under any approvals, entitlements, or authorizations granted by this action are contingent upon a Development Agreement being executed with the City of Lincoln, as per requirements of the approved Village 5 Specific Plan, and the Infrastructure & Public Facilities Financing Plan, which incorporates changes associated with this tentative map for the Applicant. Such Development Agreement shall be executed prior to City Council approval of any Final Map and may establish obligations to be completed prior to approval of any Final Map.

Prior to
approval of the
First Final Map
Community
Development
Attachment 9
480
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Large Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

Page 4 of 4 ends

Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

13. The Applicant shall provide to the Community Development Department copies of the Final Map after the City Engineer’s approval but prior to City Council approval:
• Two digital copies of the Final Map in DWG format compatible with the City’s mapping and PDF
• One plot or print of the submittal
Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

14. Prior to recordation of a large lot final map, the Subdivider shall file with the Placer County Clerk, a certificate from the Placer County Tax Collector’s Office indicating that no liens against the subdivision or any part thereof exist for unpaid State, County, Municipal or local taxes or special assessments collected with taxes, except those not yet due and payable.

Prior to Final
Map
Recordation
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

15. After recordation of the Final Map, the Developer shall provide to the City Engineer one copy of the recorded Final Map on Mylar.

Immediately
after
recordation of
Final Map
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
Attachment 9
481
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-1 ESA / 130368 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 CHAPTER 4
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Introduction
Section 15097 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines requires public agencies to establish monitoring or reporting programs for projects approved by a public agency whenever approval involves the adoption of either a mitigated negative declaration or specified environmental findings related to environmental impact reports.

The following is the updated Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) for the Village 5 Specific Plan.

The intent of the MMP is to prescribe and enforce a means for properly and successfully implementing the mitigation measures identified within the Draft Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report (DPREIR) and the Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan EIR (2017 EIR) and updated in the Draft Partially Recirculated EIR (DPREIR) for this project.

Mitigation Measures
The mitigation measures are taken from the 2017 EIR and DPREIR and are assigned the same number as in the 2017 EIR and updated in the DPREIR. The MMP describes the actions that must take place to implement each mitigation measure, the timing of those actions, and the entities responsible for implementing and monitoring the actions.

MMP Components
The components of the attached table, which contains applicable mitigation measures, are addressed briefly, below.

Impact
This column summarizes the impact stated in the 2017 EIR, or as updated and stated DPREIR.

Mitigation Measure
All mitigation measures that were identified in the 2017 EIR are presented, as revised in the DPREIR and updated in the Final EIR, and numbered accordingly.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
482

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-2 ESA / 130368 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 Action(s)
For every mitigation measure, one or more actions are described. The actions delineate the means by which the mitigation measures will be implemented, and, in some instances, the criteria for determining whether a measure has been successfully implemented. Where mitigation measures are particularly detailed, the action may refer back to the measure.

Component
This column identifies the relevant component of the proposed projects to which the mitigation measure applies. The mitigation measure may apply to the Full Specific Plan, Area A, or Windsor Cove. More than one project component may be identified.

Implementing Party
This item identifies the entity that will undertake the required action.

Timing
Implementation of the action must occur prior to or during some part of project approval, project design or construction or on an ongoing basis. The timing for each measure is identified.

Monitoring Party
The City of Lincoln is primarily responsible for ensuring that mitigation measures are successfully implemented. Within the City, a number of departments and divisions would have responsibility for monitoring some aspect of the overall project. Other agencies, such as the Placer County Air Quality Management District, may also be responsible for monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures. As a result, more than one monitoring party may be identified.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
483

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-3 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.1 Aesthetics and Visual Quality

3.1-4: Implementation of the
proposed project would introduce
light and glare into the project area.

3.1-4:

During the design review process, the applicant shall adhere to the following measures to reduce impacts from light and glare:
a) All light standards shall be shielded and directed downward so that light shall not emit higher than a horizontal level.
b) Reflective surfaces of multi-story buildings facing streets, open spaces, parks, and residential neighborhoods shall be oriented to avoid generating glare that could create a nuisance or safety hazard.
c) For parks or other facilities anticipated to include nighttime activities, the site and placement of overhead lighting shall be designed to minimize exposure of adjacent properties to spillover light and minimize the amount of light that would be visible above the horizontal plane of the light fixture.
d) Normal operating hours for lighting related to nighttime recreational activities shall be until 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and on Friday and Saturday until 11:00 p.m. to reduce the disruption to adjacent properties. Special events that would require lighting beyond normal operating hours would be subject to a permit to be issued by the City.
e) All light standards shall be the minimum height possible to achieve necessary lighting goals, subject to approval by the Public Services Director.

Shield and direct light downward.

Orient buildings to minimize glare.

Minimize light spillover for all parks and
recreational facilities.

Limit lighting for nighttime recreational
activities to 10pm Sunday through Thursday
and 11pm on Friday and Saturday, requiring
specially timed events to obtain a City
permit.

Require light standards that achieve lighting
goals and meet Public Services Director
approval.

Full Specific Plan/Area A Project applicant During design review process
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department, City
of Lincoln Public Services
Department

3.1-8: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
a cumulative increase in light and
glare in the vicinity of the Plan Area.

3.1-8:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4. See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.

3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Services

3.2-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would result in
conversion of Important Farmland to
non-agricultural use.

3.2-1(a):
a) If the PCCP has been approved and adopted, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP to mitigate impacts of converting Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Unique Farmland agricultural lands., most specifically rice lands. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in Mitigation Measure

3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2(b), shown below.

Comply with PCCP vis-à-vis agricultural
lands.

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-1.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During the permitting process
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2(b) in Section 3.4, Biological Resources, of this Draft EIR, shown below.

3.4-1
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to delineate all wetlands and waters of the U.S. or other protected waters within the proposed development. The delineation(s) shall be submitted to the USACE for verification as part of the formal Section 404 wetland delineation process. If no wetlands are determined to be present, or if wetlands would be avoided, no further mitigation would be required. Prior to fill of any wetlands, or hydrologic interruption of the wetland, the applicant must obtain a Section 404 permit and obtain Section 401 certification from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
2) For each 1.0 wetted acre of vernal pools impacted, 1.35 acres of vernal pools shall be preserved. For purposes of calculating impact and mitigation requirements, seasonal depressional wetlands shall be considered vernal pools.

For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the preservation requirement may be met by preserving 1.35 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The preservation requirement for open water may be met through preservation of 1.0 acres of open water or any wetland type for each1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required wetland preservation under this strategy will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland preservation required by any permitting agency.

Implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and

3.4-2(b).

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During the permitting process
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
484

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-4 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party For each 1.0 acres of vernal pool impact, 1.25 acres of compensatory wetlands shall be restored, enhanced or created including a minimum of 0.75 acres of vernal pool and no more than 0.5 acres of other wetlands. For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the restoration, enhancement, or creation requirement may be met by restoring, enhancing, and/or creating 1.25 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The compensatory requirement for open-water may be met through restoration, enhancement, and/or creation of 1.25 acres of open water or any wetland type for each 1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required compensatory wetland restoration, enhancement, or creation under this measure will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland restoration, enhancement, and creation required by any permitting agency as well as any wetland preservation required by a permitting agency greater than the wetland preservation amount required by this mitigation.

The compensatory requirement shall not be reduced below 1.0 by excess preservation.

Approximately 715 acres of land within the PCCP Reserve Acquisition Area that would serve as suitable mitigation land for impacts on habitat within Area A have been identified and acquired by the applicant. All mitigation lands would be located within the Upper Coon-Upper Auburn watershed north of Auburn Ravine.

Soil types at these mitigation lands would consist primarily of San JoaquinCometa sandy loams soils, with some occasionally flooded Xerofluvents soils, frequently flooded Xerofluvents soils, Cometa sandy loam soils, and CometaFiddyment complex soils. Some of these soils have impervious soil layers and support vernal pool complexes or could be restored to vernal pool or seasonal swale habitats. If the entire mitigation area is not needed for mitigation of Area A impacts, impacts to vernal pool habitats and species within other areas could be mitigated on these lands.

The mitigation lands are currently used as mostly grassland/pasture and fallow/ idle cropland, with some areas used to grow winter wheat, hay/non-alfalfa, and other crops. The mitigation lands are largely surrounded by fallow/idle cropland, rice fields, hay/non-alfalfa fields, and active cropland used for growing clover/wildflowers, rye, corn, and other rotational crops. Management of the mitigation lands could be modified to provide greater benefit to special-status plant and wildlife species.
3) Wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation shall be accompanied by the associated uplands and hydrology necessary to sustain long-term viability in a natural or restored environmental setting. 4) It is anticipated that most wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation may be accomplished on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement and will be subject to the required conservation easements and management plans. If additional lands are conserved to meet the wetland mitigation requirement, the same requirements for conservation easements and management plans shall apply.
5) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this strategy. 6) The density of wetlands on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement in some projects within the V5SP may provide wetland mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment shall be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other projects in the Plan Area to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City.
7) The City may allow mitigation located outside of Placer County that advances the City’s conservation goals and meets the biological intent of this mitigation strategy. In addition, the City may accept credits from out-of-county conservation or mitigation banks towards full or partial compliance with this strategy if the project is within the agency-approved service area for the credits.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
485

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-5 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Avoidance and Minimization Measures
8) Prior to any construction activities that could impact protected waters, a protective fence shall be erected around the boundaries of avoided wetlands, including a protective buffer as dictated in the 401, 404, or 1600 permits as described in section 9) below. This fence shall remain in place until all construction activity in the immediate area is completed. No activity shall be permitted within the protected areas except for those expressly permitted by the USACE and/or CDFW.
9) A construction buffer shall be provided along all avoided wetlands in accordance with the Section 404 permit, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Only those uses allowed in the Section 404 permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreements shall be permitted in the wetlands preserve and its buffer.
10) Water quality in the avoided wetlands shall be protected during construction in the watershed by using erosion control techniques including (as appropriate), but not necessarily limited to, preservation of existing vegetation, mulches (e.g., hydraulic, straw, wood), and geotextiles and mats. Additionally, urban runoff shall be managed to protect water quality in the wetlands preserve using techniques such as velocity dissipation devices, sediment basins and pollution collection devices.

3.4-2
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant shall obtain a Biological Opinion and any applicable incidental take authorization from USFWS and comply with the conditions and requirements therein.
2) The project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City, a Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that implements the open space, agricultural land and biological resources strategy and includes the following elements:
i. Identification and quantification of land cover and wetland removal and applicable mitigation requirements set forth below in subsection (5). ii. Identification and quantification of proposed mitigation lands and/or resources with sufficient detail to allow for City evaluation, including plans for restoration, enhancement and/or creation of wetlands.
iii. Identification of any conservation or mitigation bank credits or assignment of excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP.
iv. Draft conservation easements and draft management and monitoring plans, if applicable.
v. An endowment for long-term management of the proposed mitigation lands. 3) Any Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan must be approved by the City, in its sole discretion, at the time of the approval of any improvement plans for subdivision improvements or off-site infrastructure, recordation of a final map (not including a large lot final map that results in no disturbance of any existing natural condition), or issuance of any project-level discretionary approval for non-residential land uses that does not require a tentative subdivision map. A Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan may cover a development project or group of projects and must include any required off-site infrastructure unless covered by a separate project-level mitigation plan for that infrastructure improvement. The City may require the applicant to provide a conceptual plan for the Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that includes a calculation of acres of impact and acres of required mitigation prior to approval of a General Development Program or tentative map. A tentative map may have more than one Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan if the development authorized by the map is owned by separate owners.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
486

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-6 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party 4) Each project (including off-site infrastructure) must demonstrate compliance with an approved Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan prior to approval of a grading permit that results in land cover or wetland impact. Such compliance may be phased with the actual development of the project. Demonstration of compliance shall include:
i. Demonstrate recordation of required easements for land conservation. ii. Demonstrate ownership of applicable credits and/or assignment of any applicable excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP. iii. Demonstrate implementation of an endowment for the management of all mitigation lands.
iv. Demonstrate approval of construction and monitoring plans for any required restoration, enhancement, or creation of wetlands. Provide proof of executed contracts and initiation of construction.
v. Documentation and approval of any mitigation credits eligible for future use or assignment.
5) An Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan shall require that for every 1.0 acres of land cover impacted, 1.35 acres of land will be conserved in perpetuity. The impact area shall be calculated to the nearest onetenth (0.10) acre. The total amount of required acreage will be automatically reduced by any and all off-site conservation or mitigation land required by any permitting agency, specifically including upland areas required in association with wetland mitigation, whether acquired through mitigation bank credits or other means. The mitigation land to be conserved may be located in the Reserve Acquisition Areas, or elsewhere as determined by the City and regulatory agencies. No additional land mitigation will be required beyond the 1.35 to 1.0 requirement for the removal of land cover.
6) To determine the acreage of land cover impact, all land within the V5SP shall be considered to be “land cover,” except for land that is already developed with infrastructure, such as roadways, and homes and related development such as accessory structures, driveways, improved roadways, and landscaped areas.

Any land cover that will be maintained in or restored to a natural or semi-natural condition as required by the City and/or any state or federal permitting agency shall not be included in the land cover impacted acreage. Any wetland area required to be avoided, restored, and/or enhanced on site by the City and/or any permitting agency shall be automatically excluded from the removal calculation. 7) Land conserved under this measure shall, to the extent feasible, as determined by the City, be located within the Reserve Acquisition Area, but may be included in other areas deemed adequate by the regulatory agencies. Impacts to annual grassland, vernal pool grassland, and pasture lands cover shall be mitigated on existing or restorable grassland. All other land cover impacts may be mitigated on any natural or semi-natural land within the Reserve Acquisition Areas, specifically including agricultural land. Vernal pool grassland will be mitigated by any grassland without regard to wetted area density.
8) Conservation sites shall be subject to recorded conservation easements and management plans with an identified funding source for long-term management of conserved lands. The conservation easements and management plans are subject to approval by the City and shall provide for the long-term maintenance of biological functions and values while, whenever feasible, also providing for compatible agricultural use. The City shall accept as satisfactory mitigation any conservation easement and/or management plan required and approved by the terms and conditions of any permit issued by a state or federal resource agency. 9) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the conservation required by this strategy.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
487

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-7 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party 10) It is anticipated that, depending on the availability and relative parcel size of potential conservation sites, some projects within the V5SP may provide land cover mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and the Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment will be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other projects in the V5SP to meet all or a part of the land cover mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be provided to the satisfaction of the City.
11) Because of their particular regulatory status and their biological importance, wetlands shall be accounted for separately through mitigation ratios requiring preservation and or restoration of a set amount of wetted area calculated as a proportion of wetland impact as set forth in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. These wetted acres, along with any upland area that is conserved in association with the wetted acres, will be fully credited towards the required land cover mitigation.

It is intended that all of the wetland mitigation shall be counted towards land cover mitigation requirements. Likewise, all wetted acres contained within land cover mitigation shall be counted towards wetland mitigation.

3.2-1(b):

Concurrent with development of Area A, the project applicant shall preserve mitigation lands at ratios identified in Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2. The preserved land should be of similar agricultural productivity, soil classifications, and farmland type (Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Unique Farmland) as the land proposed for development in Area A. Conservation Easements for agricultural and biological resources may be stacked, meaning that areas preserved to mitigate for biological resources can may also serve as mitigation for agricultural impacts.

Preserve mitigation lands at ratios identified
in Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2
Area A Project applicant During development of
Area A
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.3 Air Quality

3.3-2: Construction of land uses
under the proposed project would
generate criteria pollutant emissions
that could substantially contribute to
a potential violation of applicable air
quality standards or to nonattainment
conditions.

3.3-2a:

The applicant(s) shall implement the following mitigation measures for each phase of development in the time frames provided:
a) Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans, (whichever occurs first), on project sites greater than one acre, the applicant shall submit a Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District. The applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Lincoln that the plan has been submitted to the District. It is the responsibility of the applicant to deliver the approved plan to the local jurisdiction. The applicant shall not break ground prior to receiving District approval of the Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan and delivering that approval to the City of Lincoln. The Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan shall include, but not be limited, to the following measures:
i. In order to control dust, an operational watering truck shall be on site during construction hours. In addition, dry chemical sweeping is prohibited. Watering at the construction site shall be carried out in the compliance with operating APCD rules and City of Lincoln requirements.
ii. Fugitive dust shall not exceed 40% opacity and not go beyond the project boundary at any time as required by District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust (Section 300). If lime or other drying agents are used to dry out wet grading areas, they shall be controlled so as to not exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations.

The prime contractor shall be responsible for having an individual, certified by CARB to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), who shall routinely evaluate compliance to Rule 228, Fugitive Dust on a weekly basis. iii. The track-out of bulk material onto public paved roadways as a result of operations, or erosion, shall be minimized by the use of track-out and erosion control, minimization, and preventative measures. Specifically, the prime contractor shall apply water or use other methods to control dust track out so construction vehicles leaving the site shall reduce dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being released or tracked off-site. Also, the prime contractor “wet broom” the streets (or use another method to control dust as approved by the City) if silt, dirt, mud or debris is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares within one hour from adjacent streets anytime such material track-out extends for a cumulative distance of greater than 50 feet onto any paved public road during active operations.

Submit a Construction Emission/Dust
Control Plan.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
488

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-8 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party iv. Traffic speeds on all unpaved surfaces shall be limited to 15 miles per hour or less.
v. To control dust once grading is complete, the prime contractor shall apply methods such as surface stabilization, establishment of the vegetative cover, paving, or other methods approved by the City.
vi. The prime contractor shall suspend all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous gusts) are high (typically winds greater than 25 miles per hour), and dust is traveling offsite.
vii. Stockpiles of dirt shall be covered when not being used or otherwise controlled to prevent erosion and/or dust.
b) The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e., make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower or greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. If any new equipment is added after submission of the inventory, the prime contractor shall contact the District prior to the new equipment being utilized. At least three business days prior to the use of subject heavy-duty offroad equipment, the project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, name, and phone number of the property owner, project manager, and on-site foreman.

Provide comprehensive construction
equipment inventory and anticipated
construction timeline.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
c) During construction, the contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., electricity) or clean fuel (e.g., propane, gasoline, biodiesel, and/or natural gas) generators rather than temporary diesel power generators, to the degree feasible.

Use existing or cleaner fuels and power
sources, where possible.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
d) During construction, the contractor shall minimize idling time to a maximum of 5 minutes for all diesel-powered equipment.

Minimize engine idling time to a five-minute
maximum.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
e) Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas of the construction site to limit idling to a maximum of 5 minutes.

Provide signage indicating five-minute
maximum time for engine idling.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
f) No open burning of removed vegetation shall be allowed unless permitted by the PCAPCD. All removed vegetation material shall either be chipped on site or taken to an appropriate recycling site, or if a recycling site is not available, a licensed disposal site.

Remove vegetation through chipping or at
an appropriate recycling or disposal site.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
g) A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) caused by the use or manufacture of Cutback or Emulsified asphalts for paving, road construction or road maintenance, unless such manufacture or use complies with the provisions of Rule 217.

Avoid discharging VOCs into the
atmosphere.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
h) Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated.

Maintain proper working condition for all
construction equipment.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
489

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-9 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.3-3: Operational activities
associated with development under
the proposed project would result in
emissions of criteria air pollutants at
levels that would substantially
contribute to a potential violation of
applicable air quality standards or to
nonattainment conditions.

3.3-3:

To reduce operational emissions of ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5, the following PCAPCD Standard Operational Air Quality Mitigation Measures shall be implemented as part of the project’s final design:
a) Diesel trucks shall be prohibited from idling more than five minutes. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall show on the submitted building elevations that all truck loading and unloading docks shall be equipped with one 110/208 volt power outlet for every two dock doors. Diesel Trucks idling for more than the allotted time shall be required to connect to the 110/208 volt power to run any auxiliary equipment. A minimum 2’x3’ signage which indicates “Diesel engine Idling limited to a maximum of five minutes” shall be included with the submittal of building plans.

Implement PCAPCD Standard Operational
Air Quality Mitigation Measures.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor Prior to Building Permit issuance
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
b) Prior to Design Review approval, the Site Plan shall show that the applicant has provided the number of preferential parking spaces for employees that carpool/vanpool/rideshare as required by the District. Such stalls shall be clearly demarcated with signage as approved by the Design Review Board.

Provide preferential parking for employees
that carpool/vanpool/rideshare.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant Prior to Design Review approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
c) Prior to Design Review approval, the applicant shall show that on-site bicycle racks will be provided as required by the District.

Demonstrate provision of on-site bicycle
racks.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant Prior to Design Review approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District

3.3-5: Development under the
proposed project would locate
sensitive residential receptors in
close proximity to SR 65, which
would result in the exposure of
persons to substantial toxic air
contaminant concentrations.

3.3-5:
a) The Specific Plan design guidelines and development standards shall incorporate the following measures to reduce or avoid exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs:
i. New sensitive land uses shall not be permitted within 300 feet of a large gasoline station (defined as a facility with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater). Require a 50-foot separation between gasoline stations with a throughput less than 3.6 million gallons per year.
ii. Only non-perchloroethylene dry-cleaning facilities shall be permitted within the Plan Area.

Reduce TAC exposure by placing new
sensitive lands uses no closer than 300 feet
of a large gasoline station and only permit
non-perchloroethylene dry-cleaning
facilities.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to Design Guidelines
approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) Residential units shall not be constructed at distances less than 100 feet of the edge of the SR 65 right-of-way.

Construct residential units at least 100 feet
from the edge of the SR 65 ROW.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to Design Guidelines
approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.3-7: The proposed project would
result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant
for which the region is in
nonattainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors).

3.3-7:

The applicant(s) shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.3-3 to reduce operational ROG, NOx and PM10 emissions.

See Mitigation Measure 3.3-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.3-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.3-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.3-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.3-3.

3.4 Biological Resources

3.4-1: Implementation of the
proposed project could have a
substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act through direct removal,
placement of fill, hydrological
interruption, or by other means and
would result in fill of jurisdictional
wetlands or other protected waters.

3.4-1:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to delineate all wetlands and waters of the U.S. or other protected waters within the proposed development. The delineation(s) shall be submitted to the USACE for verification as part of the formal Section 404 wetland delineation process. If no wetlands are determined to be present, or if wetlands would be avoided, no further mitigation would be required. Prior to fill of any wetlands, or hydrologic interruption of the wetland, the applicant must obtain a Section 404 permit and Provide mitigation at specified ratios. Full Specific Plan, Area A, and Windsor Cove
Project applicant During construction of each
project phase.

City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
United States Army Corps of
Engineers
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
490

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-10 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party obtain Section 401 certification from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
2) For each 1.0 wetted acre of vernal pools impacted, 1.35 acres of vernal pools shall be preserved. For purposes of calculating impact and mitigation requirements, seasonal depressional wetlands shall be considered vernal pools.

For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the preservation requirement may be met by preserving 1.35 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The preservation requirement for open water may be met through preservation of 1.0 acres of open water or any wetland type for each 1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required wetland preservation under this strategy will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland preservation required by any permitting agency.

For each 1.0 acres of vernal pool impact, 1.25 acres of compensatory wetlands shall be restored, enhanced or created including a minimum of 0.75 acres of vernal pool and no more than 0.5 acres of other wetlands. For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the restoration, enhancement, or creation requirement may be met by restoring, enhancing, and/or creating 1.25 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The compensatory requirement for open-water may be met through restoration, enhancement, and/or creation of 1.25 acres of open water or any wetland type for each

1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required compensatory wetland restoration, enhancement, or creation under this measure will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland restoration, enhancement, and creation required by any permitting agency as well as any wetland preservation required by a permitting agency greater than the wetland preservation amount required by this mitigation. The compensatory requirement shall not be reduced below 1.0 by excess preservation.

The mitigation lands are currently used as mostly grassland/pasture and fallow/idle cropland, with some areas used to grow winter wheat, hay/non-alfalfa, and other crops. The mitigation lands are largely surrounded by fallow/idle cropland, rice fields, hay/non-alfalfa fields, and active cropland used for growing clover/wildflowers, rye, corn, and other rotational crops. Management of the mitigation lands could be modified to provide greater benefit to special-status plant and wildlife species.
3) Wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation shall be accompanied by the associated uplands and hydrology necessary to sustain long-term viability in a natural or restored environmental setting. 4) It is anticipated that most wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation may be accomplished on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement and will be subject to the required conservation easements and management plans. If additional lands are conserved to meet the wetland mitigation requirement, the same requirements for conservation easements and management plans shall apply.
5) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this strategy. 6) The density of wetlands on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement in some projects within the V5SP may provide wetland mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment shall be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other Attachment 9 Exhibit B
491

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-11 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party projects in the Plan Area to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City.
7) The City may allow mitigation located outside of Placer County that advances the City’s conservation goals and meets the biological intent of this mitigation strategy. In addition, the City may accept credits from out-of-county conservation or mitigation banks towards full or partial compliance with this strategy if the project is within the agency-approved service area for the credits.

Avoidance and Minimization Measures
8) Prior to any construction activities that could impact protected waters, a protective fence shall be erected around the boundaries of avoided wetlands, including a protective buffer as dictated in the 401, 404, or 1600 permits as described in section 9) below. This fence shall remain in place until all construction activity in the immediate area is completed. No activity shall be permitted within the protected areas except for those expressly permitted by the USACE and/or CDFW.
9) A construction buffer shall be provided along all avoided wetlands in accordance with the Section 404 permit, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Only those uses allowed in the Section 404 permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreements shall be permitted in the wetlands preserve and its buffer.
10) Water quality in the avoided wetlands shall be protected during construction in the watershed by using erosion control techniques including (as appropriate), but not necessarily limited to, preservation of existing vegetation, mulches (e.g., hydraulic, straw, wood), and geotextiles and mats. Additionally, urban runoff shall be managed to protect water quality in the wetlands preserve using techniques such as velocity dissipation devices, sediment basins and pollution collection devices.

3.4-2: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in
adverse impacts to special-status
species, either directly or through
habitat modifications.

3.4-2:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

For species that are not directly covered by the PCCP, the project applicant shall implement the following avoidance and minimization measures:
1) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-6. 2) For the protection of American badger, the project applicant, for each project phase, shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction American badger den survey within the project site. The results of the survey shall be provided to the City of Lincoln. If dens or burrows determined to be potential American badger dens are found within the project site or off-site improvement areas during the preconstruction surveys, consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) shall occur prior to the initiation of any construction activities to determine an appropriate burrow excavation and/or relocation method. If American badger burrows are not found, further measures are not necessary. All survey results shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln prior to the initiation of any construction activities.

Implement PCCP measures related to
habitat preservation.

Implement avoidance and minimization
measures for impacts to special status
species that are not covered by the PCCP.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
United States Fish and Wildlife
Service
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant shall obtain a Biological Opinion and any applicable incidental take authorization from USFWS and comply with the conditions and requirements therein.
2) The project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City, a Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that implements the open space, agricultural land and biological resources strategy and includes the following elements:

Implement habitat preservation at identified
ratios.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
United States Fish and Wildlife
Service
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
492

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-12 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party i. Identification and quantification of land cover and wetland removal and applicable mitigation requirements set forth below in subsection (5). ii. Identification and quantification of proposed mitigation lands and/or resources with sufficient detail to allow for City evaluation, including plans for restoration, enhancement and/or creation of wetlands.
iii. Identification of any conservation or mitigation bank credits or assignment of excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP.
iv. Draft conservation easements and draft management and monitoring plans, if applicable.
v. An endowment for long-term management of the proposed mitigation lands. 3) Any Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan must be approved by the City, in its sole discretion, at the time of the approval of any improvement plans for subdivision improvements or off-site infrastructure, recordation of a final map (not including a large lot final map that results in no disturbance of any existing natural condition), or issuance of any project-level discretionary approval for non-residential land uses that does not require a tentative subdivision map. A Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan may cover a development project or group of projects and must include any required off-site infrastructure unless covered by a separate project-level mitigation plan for that infrastructure improvement. The City may require the applicant to provide a conceptual plan for the Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that includes a calculation of acres of impact and acres of required mitigation prior to approval of a General Development Program or tentative map. A tentative map may have more than one Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan if the development authorized by the map is owned by separate owners. 4) Each project (including off-site infrastructure) must demonstrate compliance with an approved Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan prior to approval of a grading permit that results in land cover or wetland impact. Such compliance may be phased with the actual development of the project. Demonstration of compliance shall include:
i. Demonstrate recordation of required easements for land conservation. ii. Demonstrate ownership of applicable credits and/or assignment of any applicable excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP. iii. Demonstrate implementation of an endowment for the management of all mitigation lands.
iv. Demonstrate approval of construction and monitoring plans for any required restoration, enhancement, or creation of wetlands. Provide proof of executed contracts and initiation of construction.
v. Documentation and approval of any mitigation credits eligible for future use or assignment.
5) An Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan shall require that for every 1.0 acres of land cover impacted, 1.35 acres of land will be conserved in perpetuity. The impact area shall be calculated to the nearest onetenth (0.10) acre. The total amount of required acreage will be automatically reduced by any and all off-site conservation or mitigation land required by any permitting agency, specifically including upland areas required in association with wetland mitigation, whether acquired through mitigation bank credits or other means. The mitigation land to be conserved may be located in the Reserve Acquisition Areas, or elsewhere as determined by the City and regulatory agencies. No additional land mitigation will be required beyond the 1.35 to 1.0 requirement for the removal of land cover.
6) To determine the acreage of land cover impact, all land within the V5SP shall be considered to be “land cover,” except for land that is already developed with infrastructure, such as roadways, and homes and related development such as accessory structures, driveways, improved roadways, and landscaped areas.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
493

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-13 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party 7) Land conserved under this measure shall, to the extent feasible, as determined by the City, be located within the Reserve Acquisition Area, but may be included in other areas deemed adequate by the regulatory agencies. Impacts to annual grassland, vernal pool grassland, and pasture lands cover shall be mitigated on existing or restorable grassland. All other land cover impacts may be mitigated on any natural or semi-natural land within the Reserve Acquisition Areas, specifically including agricultural land. Vernal pool grassland will be mitigated by any grassland without regard to wetted area density.
8) Conservation sites shall be subject to recorded conservation easements and management plans with an identified funding source for long-term management of conserved lands. The conservation easements and management plans are subject to approval by the City and shall provide for the long-term maintenance of biological functions and values while, whenever feasible, also providing for compatible agricultural use. The City shall accept as satisfactory mitigation any conservation easement and/or management plan required and approved by the terms and conditions of any permit issued by a state or federal resource agency. 9) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the conservation required by this strategy.

Specifically, the uplands associated with any bank wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement or creation may be applied towards the land cover mitigation requirement provided that the uplands are subject to an appropriate conservation easement and the applicant can demonstrate that the approved mitigation credits include both wetland and upland land cover to the satisfaction of the City. Mitigation and conservation banks must be approved by the USFWS, USACE, or the CDFW. Credits can count toward mitigation obligations if the banks are consistent with the requirements of state and federal natural resources agencies, as accepted by the City.
10) It is anticipated that, depending on the availability and relative parcel size of potential conservation sites, some projects within the V5SP may provide land cover mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and the Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment will be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other projects in the V5SP to meet all or a part of the land cover mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be provided to the satisfaction of the City.
11) Because of their particular regulatory status and their biological importance, wetlands shall be accounted for separately through mitigation ratios requiring preservation and or restoration of a set amount of wetted area calculated as a proportion of wetland impact as set forth in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. These wetted acres, along with any upland area that is conserved in association with the wetted acres, will be fully credited towards the required land cover mitigation.

3.4-3: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss and/or degradation of vernal
pool habitat, and the loss of specialstatus vernal pool crustaceans or amphibians.

3.4-3:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1 and 3.4-2. See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1 and 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1 and 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1 and 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1
and 3.4-2.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
494

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-14 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Avoidance and Minimization Measures
c) Orange exclusionary fencing shall be placed, and a buffer area of 250 feet (or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS) maintained, around any avoided (preserved) vernal pool crustacean or western spadefoot toad habitat during construction to prevent impacts from construction vehicles and equipment. This fencing shall be inspected by a qualified biologist throughout the construction period to ensure that it is in good functional condition.

Provide fenced buffer area of 250 feet. Full Specific Plan, Area A, and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
d) Prior to beginning work on a project site, all on-site construction personnel shall receive instruction regarding the presence of listed species and the importance of avoiding impacts to these species and their habitat.

Instruct construction personnel about listed
species and avoiding impacts.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.4-4: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss and/or degradation of rare plant
populations.

3.4-4:
a) For Areas B through J, the project applicant(s) for each phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused botanical surveys in vernal pool complexes, fresh emergent marsh, seasonal wetlands and nonnative annual grassland habitats within the Plan Area for special-status plant species including, but not limited to, pincushion navarretia, dwarf downingia, slender Orcutt grass, Sanford’s arrowhead, and bigscale balsamroot during the appropriate time of year to detect each of these species.

In order to determine the appropriate survey window, the qualified biologist shall visit reference populations when such populations are available and accessible. If no special-status plants are located during the surveys, no mitigation would be required.

Conduct botanical surveys to determine
presence of special status plant species.

Areas B through J Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife
b) If special-status plant species are located during surveys in areas proposed for ground disturbance, the project applicant for each project shall mitigate for impacts to vernal pool wetlands and complexes as described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-3, for impacts to grasslands as described in Mitigation Measure3.4-2, and for wetlands as described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. The applicant shall also report the plant survey results to CDFW using a CNDDB field survey form. In addition, the applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to develop and implement a special-status plant salvage and transplantation plan that shall be approved by CDFW. The plan shall provide for the salvage of seeds of the impacted special-status plants and soil from the site surrounding those plants. The salvaged seeds and soil shall be transplanted to a protected site with appropriate habitat. To ensure the success of transplantation and the species, the applicant shall monitor the protected site for three years from the date of transplantation.

If special-status plant species are found,
implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-3 for
vernal pool wetlands, Mitigation Measure

3.4-2 for grasslands, and Mitigation
Measure 3.4-1 for wetlands. Use a CNDDB
survey form to report results to CDFW.

Areas B through J Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife
c) If state or federally-listed plants are found during surveys, project applicant for each project phase shall consult with CDFW to obtain an Incidental Take Permit under Section 2081 of the CESA and comply with the conditions and requirements therein, and/or USFWS to obtain a Biological Opinion under Section 7 of FESA and comply with the conditions and requirements.

If state or federally-listed species are found,
obtain Incidental Take Permit from CDFW
and comply with USFWS requirements.

Areas B through J Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife, United States Fish
and Wildlife Service

3.4-5: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss of western pond turtle and/or
degradation of potential habitat.

3.4-5:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) Prior to project construction for each phase that would disturb any potential habitat for western pond turtle, the project applicant(s) for such phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys of potential habitat and the vicinity (250 feet) within 30 days prior to project construction. If no western pond turtles are located, no mitigation would be required and construction could proceed.
2) If western pond turtles are determined to be present, and potential habitat is not proposed for modification due to development of the site, then exclusionary fencing shall be used to prevent the turtle(s) from entering the construction area.

The location of the fence shall be determined by a qualified biologist. Retained habitat shall also be protected through implementation of water quality and Implement habitat preservation at identified
ratios
Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
495

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-15 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party hydrology measures that ensure habitat remains viable post-construction as required for Clean Water Act Sections 401 and 404 permits and would be consistent with the Draft PCCP.
3) If occupied habitat would be impacted or lost, the project applicant(s) for each phase shall retain a qualified biologist approved by the CDFW to relocate all potentially affected western pond turtles into suitable habitat. Lost habitat would be mitigated through the Sections 401 and 404 permitting process, and would be consistent with the Draft PCCP.

3.4-6: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss or disturbance of nesting birds
and the loss or degradation of
special-status bird nesting and
foraging habitat.

3.4-6:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b) and/or (c), below, as applicable.

For special-status bird species that are not covered under the PCCP, the mitigation measures for nesting habitat in Mitigation Measure 3.4-6(c) shall be implemented.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Implement avoidance and minimization
measures for impacts to special status
species that are not covered by the PCCP.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-2(b)(2)-(10). See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).
c) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures for nesting habitat shall apply:
1) If construction activity that may disturb nesting birds (according to a qualified biologist) occurs during the nesting season (February 15 - September 1), the project applicant(s) for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre-construction breeding-season survey of the project site at least 30 days prior to onset of construction. Surveys for nesting raptors shall be conducted within ¼ mile of proposed construction activities. A survey for nesting birds shall be conducted within 500 feet of construction areas to determine if any birds are nesting on or within 500 feet of the project site. The results of the survey shall be valid only for the season when it is conducted. New surveys shall be conducted if construction of the surveyed area extends into the following season or if construction is suspended for more than 14 days during the nesting season, or if there is a substantial change in the level of disturbance at the site, unless all the potential nesting trees or other habitat have been removed. 2) If the pre-construction survey does not identify any protected raptor or bird nests on or within the buffers to the project site, no mitigation shall be required.

However, should any active nests be located within 500 feet of a proposed construction area at any time throughout the construction, the project applicant(s) for each project phase, in consultation with CDFW, shall avoid all bird nest sites located in the project site disturbance area(s) during the breeding season (approximately February 15 - September 1) while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction in close proximity to the nest during the nesting season or establishing a non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site. The size of the buffer zone shall be determined in consultation with CDFW. The buffer zone shall be delineated by orange temporary construction fencing. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer in use. Should construction activities cause the nesting bird to vocalize, make defensive flights at intruders, get up from a brooding position, or fly off the nest, then a qualified biologist should identify an increased exclusionary buffer such that activities are far enough from the nest to stop this agitated behavior.

Additional Measures for Swainson’s Hawk
3) The project applicant(s) for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a Swainson’s hawk nesting survey within the area to be disturbed, extending out to one-half mile. The survey shall be conducted during the nesting season of the same calendar year that construction is expected to begin, and Conduct any tree removal and construction
activities according to the protocol
described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-6(c).

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During construction per the time frames described in
Mitigation Measure 3.4-6(c)
for tree removal and
construction activities
between March 15 and
August 30.

City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
496

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-16 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party prior to the issuance of any grading permits. If this survey does not identify any nesting Swainson’s hawk in the area within the project site that will be disturbed plus the one-half mile radius, no mitigation would be required. 4) Should any active Swainson’s hawk nests be located within one-half mile of the disturbance area, no project-related activities that could cause nest abandonment or forced fledging (such as heavy equipment operation), shall be initiated within the one-quarter mile (buffer zone) of an active nest between March 1 and September 15. If high quality Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat would be removed (i.e., alfalfa fields and pasture), then the applicant shall purchase mitigation credits for Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat at a CDFWapproved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.35:1 or protect similar value agricultural land at a ratio of 1.35:1 with a conservation easement that maintains the land in high-value Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat in perpetuity, consistent with Mitigation Measure 3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

Additional Measures for Burrowing Owl
5) Prior to project construction the project applicant(s) for each project phase shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct both nesting and wintering season surveys for burrowing owl to determine if potential habitat within 500 feet of ground disturbance is used by this species. The timing and methodology for the surveys shall be based on the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. A qualified biologist will conduct four survey visits: 1) at least one visit between February 15 and April 15, and 2) a minimum of three survey visits, at least three weeks apart between April 15 and July 1. If feasible, at least one visit will occur after June 15.

Surveys will be conducted within areas that, according to the qualified biologist, could support burrowing owl nesting habitat at the project site and within 150 meters of areas that will be directly or indirectly impacted by the project, if feasible.
6) If burrowing owls are discovered during the surveys, the project applicant shall notify the CDFW. A qualified biologist shall monitor the owls and establish a fenced exclusion zone around each occupied burrow. No construction activities shall be allowed within the exclusion buffer zone until such time that the burrows are determined to be unoccupied by a qualified biologist. The buffer zones shall be a minimum of 150 feet from an occupied burrow during the non-breeding season (September 1 through January 31), and a minimum of 250 feet from an occupied burrow during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31). 7) If complete avoidance is not feasible, the CDFW shall be consulted regarding a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan. All activities that will result in a disturbance to burrows shall be approved by CDFW prior to implementation.

Additional Measures for Tricolored Blackbird
8) Prior to project construction the project applicant(s) for each project phase shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct a tricolored blackbird nesting survey within the area to be disturbed, targeting potential breeding habitat such as emergent marsh, riparian thickets, and blackberry brambles. Two surveys shall be conducted at least three weeks apart between March 15 and September 1 within 500 feet of the area subject to ground disturbance. If a nesting colony is found within the survey area the project applicant(s) shall consult with CDFW to develop a Tricolored Blackbird Mitigation Plan to avoid, minimize and compensate for impacts to occupied nesting habitat and adjacent foraging habitat. Mitigation measures may include work windows (March 15 to September 1) to avoid impacting an active on-site nesting colony, purchasing conservation easements to protect occupied nesting and foraging habitat, or other measures mutually agreed upon by the applicant(s) and CDFW.

3.4-7: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss of valley elderberry longhorn
beetle and/or loss or degradation of
potential habitat.

3.4-7:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County and City and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP, which shall be deemed to mitigate for impacts to the VELB. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (c)-(e), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Protect elderberry shrubs as described in
Mitigation Measures 3.4-7(c) through

3.4-7(e).

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
497

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-17 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party c) For construction requiring consultation under Section 7 of the FESA, the project applicant shall obtain incidental take authorization and comply with the requirements therein. If no Section 7 consultation is required (because no federal permit is required), the applicant shall comply with mitigation measures (d) through (f). d) The removal of elderberry shrubs or their stems measuring one inch or greater (removal or trimming) shall be compensated for by salvaging and planting the affected elderberry shrubs and planting additional elderberry shrubs and associated native riparian plants at a 1:1 ratio. Mitigation planting shall occur, to the maximum extent practicable, in areas adjacent to the impact area and/or located to fill in existing gaps in riparian corridors. If the plants to be removed show recent boring holes, the project applicants shall consult with the USFWS and obtain incidental take authorization prior to removal.
e) Elderberry shrubs with stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level that are not proposed to be removed shall be protected as follows during construction:

1. Any ground disturbing activities within 100 feet of elderberry plants containing stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level shall provide a minimum setback of at least 20 feet from the drip line of each elderberry plant containing stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level. The setbacks shall be fenced and flagged to prohibit equipment and materials encroachment into the setback zone. Fire fuel breaks (disked land) may not be included within the 20-foot setback.

2. The project applicant shall brief the construction foreman on the need to avoid damaging the elderberry plants (unless the proper take authorization is obtained) and the possible penalties for not complying with these requirements. A copy of these mitigation measures shall be provided to the construction foreman for his distribution to his crews by the project applicant.

3. No insecticides, herbicides, fertilizers, or other chemicals that might harm the beetle or its host plant shall be used in the buffer areas, or within 100 feet of any elderberry plant with one or more stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level.

4. No mowing shall occur closer than five feet to elderberry plant stems. Mowing shall be done in a manner that avoids damaging elderberry plants (e.g., avoid stripping away bark through careless use of mowing/trimming equipment).

5. Trimming of elderberry stems less than one inch in diameter may occur between September 1 and March 14. The elderberry plants shall only be trimmed between November through the first two weeks in February, or when the plants are dormant and after they have lost their leaves.

3.4-8: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in
changes to surface water quality in
Auburn Ravine that could affect
Central Valley Steelhead and
Chinook salmon due to the
reconstruction and/or widening of
various bridges within the Plan Area.

3.4-8:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted and approved prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the The project applicant(s) (be they the City, County, or another agency) shall comply with the PCCP and mitigate for impacts to Central Valley steelhead and Chinook salmon as stated in the PCCP. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation has not been adopted and approved prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the project applicant(s) (be they the City, County, or another agency) shall comply with the following mitigation measures:
1) Obtain a Biological Opinion and incidental take authorization for Central Valley steelhead and winter-run and spring-run Chinook salmon from NMFS and comply with the conditions and requirements therein.
2) Obtain any necessary permits from the USACE, CDFW, and the RWQCB.

Dewatering plans and the specific temporary impacts to Auburn Ravine associated with bridge construction shall be discussed in the permit applications and avoidance and minimization measures shall be proposed, including timing of construction to avoid presence of steelhead and Chinook salmon, fish rescue and relocation, as well as specific BMPs to avoid impacts to these species and their habitat. The permit requirements shall include the following elements:
• In-water construction work windows shall be observed in consultation with NMFS and CDFW, and as specified in the permits issued.

Protect Central Valley steelhead and winterrun and spring-run Chinook salmon as described in Mitigation Measures 3.4-8(b).

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
498

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-18 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party • Applicant(s) shall implement a pile driving, dewatering and fish rescue plan.

The plan shall include specific measures to avoid and minimize impacts to salmonids and their habitats during bridge construction, and shall be approved by NMFS and CDFW.
3) Install Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) fences within 200 feet of work along Auburn Ravine, as indicated in the 401 or 404 permits. The ESA fencing shall be delineated on the final plans for each project phase and the fence shall be installed and remain on-site until construction within 200 feet of the Auburn Ravine preserve area is completed.
4) Implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1 and construction best management practices (BMPs) as prescribed in the project’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared in accordance with the California National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, NPDES No. CAR000002). These BMPs shall be in place throughout the construction for each project phase. The SWPPP shall include specific measures for water conservation; vehicle and equipment cleaning, fueling and maintenance; dewatering; paving and grinding; concrete finishing and curing; directing water away from work areas; use of attachments on construction equipment to catch debris; use of approved covers or platforms to collect debris; stockpiling of accumulated debris and waste generated during demolition away from watercourses; and ensuring safe passage of wildlife, as necessary.

3.4-9: Implementation of the
proposed project could have a
substantial adverse effect on riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural
communities identified in local, state,
or federal plans, policies, or
regulations.

3.4-9:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted and approved prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the The project applicant(s) shall comply with the PCCP and mitigate for impacts to and loss of sensitive natural communities as stated in the PCCP. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation has not been adopted and approved prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the project applicant(s) shall comply with Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3,

3.4-4, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,
and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,
and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,
and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, and 3.10-1.

3.4-11: Implementation of the
proposed project could conflict with
the provisions of approved local,
regional or state policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance.

3.4-11:
a) For impacts to threatened or endangered vegetation, the project applicant(s) shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, 3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4 9, and 3.10-1 as applicable.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3,

3.4-4, 3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8, 3.4 9, and

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,

3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4-9, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,

3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4 9, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,

3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4 9, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, 3.4-5, 3.4-6,

3.4-7, 3.4-8, 3.4 9, and 3.10-1.
b) For impacts to heritage oak trees, the project applicant(s) shall first make every reasonable attempt to avoid any heritage oak tree by designing around it. If a heritage oak tree cannot be avoided due to health, safety, and welfare risks, the project applicant(s) shall provide the following mitigation:
i. Submit a justification statement as to why the heritage tree(s) cannot be preserved in place to the City’s Community Development Director. ii. Provide a Site Plan with proposed development which also identifies the location of the heritage tree(s) to be removed.

Protect heritage oak trees by making every
reasonable attempt, and if inevitable, submit
a justification statement to the City’s
Community Development Director, identify
oak trees to be removed on the site plan,
and replace oak trees inch by inch.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
iii. If the Community Development Director deems the justification statement to be valid, the project applicant(s) shall mitigate the loss of heritage oak trees on an inch for inch basis. Specifically, for every inch of heritage oak tree removed, an inch of oak tree shall be planted. All new plantings shall be plantings in a minimum of 15 gallon pots, and shall be of the same species of oak as was being removed and replaced, and shall, if feasible, be located on the property from which the heritage oak tree was removed. Project applicant(s) shall submit to the City’s Community Development Director a revegetation plan for his/her review and approval. The project applicant(s) shall irrigate and maintain the new plantings for a minimum of three years, at which time a licensed arborist shall opine as to whether the trees are sufficiently established to release the project applicant(s) from continuing to irrigate and maintain the plantings. Any replacement trees which die before the end of the irrigation and maintenance obligations shall be replaced at a 1:1 ratio.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
499

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-19 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.4-13: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
a cumulative substantial adverse
effect on federally protected wetlands
defined by Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act through direct removal,
placement of fill, hydrological
interruption, or by other means and
would result in fill of jurisdictional
wetlands or other protected waters.

3.4-13:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-1.

3.4-14: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss and/or degradation of
vernal pool habitat, and the loss of
special-status vernal pool
crustaceans or amphibians.

3.4-14:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, and

3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

3.4-15: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss and/or degradation of
rare plant populations.

3.4-15:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and 3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3,
and 3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and

3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and

3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and

3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, 3.4-3, and 3.4-4.

3.4-16: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss of western pond
turtle and/or degradation of potential
habitat.

3.4-16:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-5. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-5.

3.4-17: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss or disturbance of
nesting birds and the loss or
degradation of special-status bird
habitat.

3.4-17:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-6. See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2
and 3.4-6.

3.4-18: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss of valley elderberry
longhorn beetle and/or degradation of
potential habitat.

3.4-18:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-7. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-7.

3.4-19: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative changes to surface water
quality in Auburn Ravine that could
affect Central Valley steelhead and
Chinook salmon due to the widening
or construction of bridges within
western Placer County.

3.4-19:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-8. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-8.

3.4-20: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
a cumulative substantial adverse
effect on riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural communities
identified in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations or by CDFW
or USFWS.

3.4-20:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-9. See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2
and 3.4-9.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
500

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-20 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.5 Climate Change

3.5-1: Construction and operation of
the proposed project would result in a
cumulatively considerable increase in
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
that could conflict with an applicable
plan, policy or regulation of an
appropriate regulatory agency
adopted for the purpose of reducing
GHG emissions.

3.5-1:

The following mitigation measures are based on measures identified by the project applicant, by the PCAPCD, by the California Attorney General, and by CAPCOA. The following measures focus primarily on non-transportation energy efficiency. Measures associated with reducing transportation emissions have already been incorporated into the GHG emission estimates shown in Table 3.5-1. The following measures will ensure that all Title 24 requirements are met and will further reduce GHG emissions through energy efficiency improvements.

All residential buildings shall:
• Meet or exceed CalGreen Tier 2 requirements in place at the time of Building Permit issuance.
• Be pre-plumbed and structurally engineered for the future installation of a complete solar energy system.
• Include a tankless water heating system, a whole house ceiling fan, and “Energy Star” appliances (stoves, dishwashers, and any other appliances typically included within the initial installation by the builder).
• Include an energy efficient air conditioning unit(s) that exceeds the SEER ratio by a minimum of two points at the time of building permit issuance. • Include programmable thermostat timers.
• Include exterior outlets on all single-family and multi-family buildings to allow the use of electrically-powered landscape equipment.
• Include wiring for at least one electric car charging station. • Meet the 2016 Plumbing Code on all residences to reduce indoor and outdoor water use in installing low-flow bathroom faucets, kitchen faucets, toilets, and showers, and landscaping that uses water-efficient, drought resistant plants, and water-saving irrigation systems. Additionally, all residential units shall be pre-plumbed to enable the reuse of graywater systems.
• Not include wood-burning fireplaces, woodstoves, and other similar wood-burning devices. This prohibition shall be included in any covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) that are established.
• Provide covered storage facilities for securing bicycles for 15 percent or more of building occupants (multi-family housing units).
• Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall establish tree planting guidelines that require residents to plant trees to shade buildings primarily on the west and south sides of buildings. Recommended use of deciduous trees (to allow solar gain during the winter) and direct shading of air conditioning systems shall be included in the guidelines.

Meet all Title 24 requirements. Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction Placer County Air Pollution District, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
All non-residential structures within the Plan Area shall:
• Be pre-plumbed and structurally engineered for the future installation of a complete solar energy system.
• Install photovoltaic rooftop energy systems on all community buildings and any commercial buildings over 100,000 square feet.
• Use “Energy Star” rated (or greater) roofing materials. • Use both indoor and outdoor energy efficient lighting that meets or exceeds Title 24 requirements.
• Include an energy efficient heating system and an air conditioning system that exceeds the SEER ratio by a minimum of two points at the time of building permit issuance.
• Only use low flow water fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets, showers, etc. • Only use programmable thermostat timers.
• Include enough bike parking facilities to meet peak demand. Bike parking shall also be included near all transit locations that are developed during the course of this Plan. This will include providing secure bicycle racks and/or storage within 200 yards of a building entrance for five percent or more of all Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff (measured at peak periods) and provide showers and changing facilities in the Attachment 9 Exhibit B
501

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-21 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party building, or within 200 yards of a primary staff building entrance, for 0.5 percent of FTE staff (measured at peak periods), or
• Provide secure bike racks and/or storage within 200 yards of a public building entrance according to the following guidelines based on project square footage:
• Up to 5,000 square feet, two or more bicycle racks,
• 5,001 – 20,000 square feet, three or more bicycle racks, • 20,001 – 50,000 square feet, six or more bicycle racks, • More than 50,000 square feet, ten or more bicycle racks. • Install two 110/208 volt power outlets for every two loading docks. • Reserve a minimum of five percent of the total customer parking spaces within commercial and retail parking lots for electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, alternative fueled vehicles, and carpools.
• Install electric vehicle charging stations for a minimum of three percent of the total vehicle parking capacity of the site.
• Include pedestrian-friendly paths and cross walks in all parking lots. • Pave all parking lots with reflective coatings (albedo = 0.30 or better). This measure is considered feasible if the additional cost is less than 10 percent of the cost of applying a standard asphalt product.

In addition to the above measures, the following shall also be incorporated:
• Prior to project approval, the applicant shall only show energy efficient lighting for all street, parking, and area lighting associated with the V5SP. The applicant shall also work to limit the hours of operation of outdoor lights through the use of timers and/or motion sensors, to the extent that these strategies do not compromise public safety. • Any new park areas within the Plan Area shall include bicycle racks at appropriate locations and a community notice board and information kiosk within information about community events, ridesharing, and commute alternatives. • Prior to issue of an occupancy permit within the Plan Area, the applicant shall create informational materials informing occupants of the alternative travel amenities provided, including ridesharing and public transit availability schedules and the Plan Area’s pedestrian bicycle, and equestrian paths to community centers, shopping areas, employment areas, schools, parks, and recreation areas. • Maximize the amount of drought tolerant landscaping by minimizing the amount of turf in all areas where this option is feasible.

3.6 Cultural Resources

3.6-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would adversely
impact historic architectural
resources directly through demolition
or substantial alteration, or indirectly
through changes to historical setting.

3.6-1:

When project-level development plans outside of Area A or Windsor Cove are submitted to the City of Lincoln for approval, the project proponent shall be required to complete a cultural resources investigation for review and approval by the City that includes, at a minimum:
• An updated records search at the North Central Information Center; • An intensive cultural resources survey, documenting and evaluating resources 45 years or older within and adjacent to the project footprint for listing in the California or National Registers;
• A report disseminating the results of this research; and, • Recommendations for additional mitigation to resolve adverse impacts to recorded cultural resources.

The survey shall be carried out by a qualified historian or architectural historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Architectural History, and can be compiled in the same document as Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(a). Demolition or substantial alteration of all previously recorded historic resources, including significant historic resources encountered during the survey and evaluation efforts, shall be avoided. Any alterations, including relocation, to historic buildings or structures shall conform to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings. If avoidance of identified historic resources is deemed infeasible, the City shall prepare a treatment Complete a cultural resources investigation. Full Specific Plan, apart from Area A and Windsor
Cove
Project applicant Prior to project-level
development plan submittal
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
502

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-22 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party plan to include, but not limited to, adaptive reuse, photo-documentation and public interpretation of the resource.

If avoidance, adaptive reuse, or relocation of an historic resource is determined infeasible, a qualified architectural historian shall be retained to document the affected historic resource in accordance with the National Park Service’s Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and/or Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) standards. Such standards typically include large format photography using (4x5) negatives, written data, and copies of original plans if available. The HABS/HAER documentation packages shall be archived at local libraries and historical repositories, as well as the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System. Public interpretation of historic resources at their original site shall also occur in the form of a plaque, kiosk or other method of describing the building’s historic or architectural importance to the general public. These mitigation actions will be undertaken at the developer’s expense.

3.6-2: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in
damage or destruction of known or
previously unidentified unique
archaeological resources.

3.6-2(a):

When project-level development plans outside of Area A or Windsor Cove are submitted to the City of Lincoln for approval, the project proponent shall be required to complete a cultural resources investigation for review and approval by the City that includes, at a minimum:
• An updated records search at the North Central Information Center; • An intensive cultural resources survey, including subsurface presence/absence studies as appropriate;
• Contact and coordination with the Native American Heritage Commission and interested and involved local tribes;
• A report disseminating the results of this research that evaluates the eligibility of recorded resources for inclusion in the National and California Registers; and, • Recommendations for additional cultural resources investigations necessary to mitigate adverse impacts to recorded and/or undiscovered archaeological resources.

Complete a cultural resources investigation. Full Specific Plan, apart from Area A and Windsor
Cove
Project applicant During plan submittal City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Additional cultural resources investigations may include testing and evaluation of archaeological resources, as well as data recovery efforts. If a significant unique archaeological resource is present that could be adversely impacted by a project, the project proponent shall:
a) In consultation with the lead agency and archaeologist, determine if preservation in place is feasible. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines section 15126.4(b)(3), this may be accomplished through planning construction to avoid the resource; incorporating the resource within open space; capping and covering the resource; or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement; or b) Design and implement an Archaeological Research Design and Treatment Plan (ARDTP). If avoidance is not feasible, the project proponent shall hire a Secretary of the Interior-qualified archaeological consultant who shall prepare a draft ARDTP that shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln for review and approval. The ARDTP shall identify how the proposed data recovery program would preserve the significant information the archaeological resource is expected to contain. Treatment of unique archaeological resources shall follow the applicable requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Treatment for most resources would consist of (but would not be not limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, site documentation, and historical research, with the aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of the significant resource to be impacted by the project. The ARDTP shall include provisions for analysis of data in a regional context, reporting of results within a timely manner and subject to review and comments by the appropriate Native American representative before being finalized, curation of artifacts and data at a local facility acceptable to the appropriate Native American representative, and dissemination of final confidential reports to the appropriate Native American representative, the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System, the City, and interested professionals.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
503

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-23 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.6-2(b):

Before the start of grading or excavation activities, construction personnel involved with earth-moving activities shall be informed of the possibility of encountering archaeological resources, the appearance and types of resources likely to be seen during construction activities, and the proper notification procedures to follow should archaeological resources be encountered. This worker training shall be prepared and presented by a qualified archaeologist.

If archaeological resources are discovered during earth-moving activities, the requirements of General Plan Policy OSC‐6.7 (Discovery of Archaeological/ Paleontological Resources) shall be followed, as described herein. In the event of accidental discovery during construction, all work must halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery if subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin are discovered during construction. A qualified professional archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeologist shall be retained to evaluate the significance of the find, and shall have the authority to modify the no-work radius as appropriate, using professional judgment. A Native American monitor, following the Guidelines for Monitors/Consultants of Native American Cultural, Religious, and Burial Sites established by the NAHC, will be required if the nature of the unanticipated discovery is prehistoric.

Work cannot continue within the no-work radius until the archaeologist conducts sufficient research and data collection to make a determination that the resource is either 1) not cultural in origin; or 2) not potentially significant or eligible for listing on the California or National Registers.

If a potentially eligible resource is encountered, then the lead agency shall require the project proponent to arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource, if feasible or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if eligible, potentially data recovery as mitigation. The determination shall be formally documented in writing and submitted to the lead agency as verification that the provisions in CEQA for managing unanticipated discoveries have been met. Curation of any identified resources would be determined through consultation between the archaeologist, project proponent, and lead agency during the course of analysis.

Inform construction personnel about the
possibility of archaeological resource
discovery during construction.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Before grading or
excavation
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.6-3: Ground-disturbing construction
associated with implementation of the
proposed project could result in
disturbance or destruction of a
paleontological resource.

3.6-3:

Before the start of grading or excavation activities, construction personnel involved with earth-moving activities shall be informed of the possibility of encountering fossils, the appearance and types of fossils likely to be seen during construction activities, and the proper notification procedures to follow should fossils be encountered. This worker training shall be prepared and presented by a qualified paleontologist.

Inform construction personnel about the
possibility of fossil discovery during
construction.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
Windsor Cove
Project applicant Before grading or
excavation
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
If paleontological resources are discovered during earth-moving activities the following requirements of General Plan Policy OSC‐6.7 (Discovery of Archaeological/Paleontological Resources) will be followed: the construction crew shall immediately cease work and the Planning Department shall be notified immediately if any paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are uncovered during construction. All construction must stop in within 100 feet of the find and a paleontologist shall be retained to evaluate the resource and prepare and implement a proposed mitigation plan, including curation, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines.

3.6-4: Ground-disturbing activities
associated with construction of the
proposed project could result in
damage to previously unidentified
human remains.

3.6-4:
a) Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b). See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).
b) In the event that evidence of human remains is discovered, the following requirements of General Plan Policy OSC‐6.10 (Discovery of Human Remains) shall be followed. Construction activities within any area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains shall be halted or diverted. In addition, the provisions of Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code (PRC), and Assembly Bill (AB) 2641 shall be implemented. Specifically, the discovery shall be reported to the County Coroner (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code) and reasonable protection measures be taken during construction to protect the discovery from disturbance (AB 2641). If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner will notify the NAHC which will then designates a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the project (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). The designated MLD then has 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains (AB 2641). If the landowner does not agree with Follow Lincoln General Plan Policy OSC6.10 in the event of discovery of human remains.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During construction Native American Heritage Commission, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
504

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-24 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (Section 5097.94 of the PRC). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not be further disturbed (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). The United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) Tribal Council shall be solicited their input as part of the mitigation process.

3.6-5: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would result in significant
cumulative impacts on historic
architectural resources.

3.6-5:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-1.

3.6-6: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would not result in
significant cumulative impacts on
unique archaeological resources.

3.6-6:

Implement Mitigation Measures 3.6-2(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measures 3.6-2(a) and

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures

3.6-2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures

3.6-2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures

3.6-2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures 3.6-
2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

3.6-7: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would not result in
significant cumulative impacts on
paleontological resources.

3.6-7:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-3.

3.6-8: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would not result in
significant cumulative impacts on
human remains.

3.6-8:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b) and Mitigation Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b) and
Mitigation Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and
(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

3.7 Energy

3.7-1: Construction of the proposed
project would not use fuel and energy
in an unnecessary, wasteful, or
inefficient manner during project
construction.

3.7-1:

The applicant(s) shall implement the following mitigation measures for each phase of development in the time frames provided:
a) The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e., make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower or greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. If any new equipment is added after submission of the inventory, the prime contractor shall contact the District prior to the new equipment being utilized. At least three business days prior to the use of subject heavy-duty offroad equipment, the project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, name, and phone number of the property owner, project manager, and on-site foreman.

Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans, (whichever occurs first), the applicant(s) shall provide a written calculation to the District for approval demonstrating that the heavy-duty (> 50 horsepower) off-road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased and subcontractor vehicles, will meet Tier 4 emission standards or the equivalent Tier standards established by the State in place at the time of construction. If Tier 4 equipment is unavailable for any equipment type, the prime contractor shall notify the PCAPCD that Tier 3 off-road equipment will be utilized.
c) During construction, the contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., electricity) or clean fuel (e.g., propane, gasoline, biodiesel, and/or natural gas) generators rather than temporary diesel power generators, to the degree feasible. d) During construction, the contractor shall minimize idling time to a maximum of 5 minutes for all diesel-powered equipment.

Provide inventory of construction vehicles
and equipment and calculations, utilize
existing power sources and clean fuel to the
degree feasible, minimize idling time to five
minutes, provide sign indicating idle time
limit, and maintain all construction
equipment in working condition.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant During each corresponding phase of development
Placer County Air Pollution
District, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
505

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-25 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party e) Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas of the construction site to limit idling to a maximum of 5 minutes.
f) Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated

3.8 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity

3.8-2: The proposed project would
not result in substantial soil erosion
or the loss of topsoil.

3.8-2(a):

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1(a) and (b).
a) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City Public Works Department and CVRWQB, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) detailing measures to control soil erosion and waste discharges during construction. The SWPPP shall include an erosion control and restoration plan, a water quality monitoring plan, a hazardous materials management plan, and post-construction BMPs. The BMPs shall be maintained until all areas disturbed during maintenance have been adequately stabilized.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1(a) and (b). See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).
i. The specific BMPs that would be incorporated into the SWPPP shall be determined during the final stages of the proposed Project design. The SWPPP shall include specific practices to minimize the potential that pollutants will leave the site during construction. Such practices include establishing designated equipment staging areas, minimizing disturbance of soils and existing vegetation, protection of spoils and soil stockpile areas, and equipment exclusion zones prior to the commencement of any construction activity; designating equipment washout areas; and establishing proper vehicle fuel and maintenance practices. ii. The applicant shall require contractors using and/or storing hazardous materials, such as vehicle fuels and lubricants, to do so in designated staging areas located away from surface waters according to local, state, and federal regulations as applicable.
iii. All contractors conducting maintenance-related work shall be required to prepare and implement a SWPPP to control soil erosion and waste discharges of other maintenance-related contaminants. The general contractor and subcontractor(s) conducting the work shall be responsible for preparing or implementing the SWPPP, regularly inspecting measures, and maintaining the BMPs in good working order. Maintenance vehicles and equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and shall be properly maintained to prevent contamination of soil or water from external grease and oil or from leaking hydraulic fluid, fuel, oil, and grease. iv. Methods and materials used for herbicide and pesticide application shall be in accordance with label directions, DWR’s most current guidelines on herbicide and pesticide use, and with laws and regulations administered by the Department of Pesticide Regulation.
v. Prior to approval of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall cause the preparation of and implementation of a Spill Prevention and Control Plan (SPCP). The SPCP shall be accessible on site at all times prior to initiation of maintenance activities, and throughout the activities. The SPCP shall identify the spill control materials that must be fully stocked on site at all times and include a plan for the emergency cleanup of any spills of fuel or other materials that may be released. Maintenance Yard staff shall be provided the necessary information from the SPCP to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters prior to commencement of construction activities and provide all necessary protocols to contain any spill that might occur. Any such spills, and the cleanup efforts, shall be reported by the on site contractor in an incident report to Placer County Environmental Health as the Certified Unified Program Agency or as directed by Environmental Health.
vi. Any in-water work shall be conducted in accordance with requirements as contained in the Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404 permits, California Fish and Game Code section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, and any other applicable regulatory permits or agreements.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
506

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-26 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party b) Prior to approval of final improvement plans, the project applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that meets all the requirements described below. i. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include the proposed water quality facilities and shall be prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.400 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. The Water Quality Management Plan shall be consistent with goals and standards established under federal and state non-point source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations, the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan. ii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a description of all nonstructural BMPs and include Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), or similar regulatory mechanism, to enforce implementation of non-structural BMPs.

Non-structural BMPs shall include, but not be limited to, “good housekeeping” practices for materials storage and waste management, storm drain system stenciling, landscape chemical use guidelines, and street sweeping. iii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities during project operation, which the City shall consider and implement. iv. All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual adopted by the City for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based postconstruction BMPs shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs and shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the Section 10, Drainage, of the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and the Placer County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s Stormwater Management Manual. All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the proposed project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs.
v. To comply with the requirements of the Placer County Mosquito and Vector Control District, all BMPs shall be designed to discharge all waters within 96 hours of the completion of runoff from a storm event. All graded areas must drain so that no standing water can accumulate for more than 96 hours within water quality facilities.
vi. Stormwater runoff from the proposed project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment, oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. Examples of these BMPs include, but are not limited to, grass strips, bioretention, bioswales, composite/treatment train BMPs, detention basins (surface/grass-lined), media filters (mostly sand filters), porous pavement, retention ponds (surface pond with a permanent pool), wetland basins (basins with open water surface), a combined category including both retention ponds and wetland basins, and wetland channels (swales and channels with wetland vegetation). The Water Quality Plan shall include plans for the maintenance of proposed BMPs. No water quality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
507

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-27 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

3.9-2: The proposed project could
create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into
the environment.

3.9-2:
a) Prior to final project design or if none is required, any earth-disturbing activities at the project site, the City shall require that the applicant conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) areas that are not already evaluated in an existing Phase I ESA. The Phase I ESA shall be prepared by a Registered Environmental Assessor (REA) or other qualified professional to assess the potential for contaminated soil or groundwater conditions at the project site. The Phase I ESA shall include a review of appropriate federal and State hazardous materials databases, as well as relevant local hazardous material site databases for hazardous waste on-site and off-site locations within a one-quarter mile radius of the area of analysis. The Phase I ESA shall also include a review of existing or past land uses and aerial photographs, summary of results of reconnaissance site visit(s), and review of other relevant existing information that could identify the potential existence of contaminated soil or groundwater. If no contaminated soil or groundwater is identified, or the Phase I ESA does not recommend any further investigation, then no further action is required.

Conduct a Phase I ESA for all other areas
not yet evaluated.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
b) If existing hazardous materials contamination is identified during the execution of Mitigation Measure 3.9-2(a), and the future Phase I ESA recommends further review, the applicant shall retain an REA to conduct follow-up sampling to characterize the contamination and to identify any required remediation that shall be conducted, consistent with applicable regulations prior to any earth-disturbing activities. The environmental professional shall prepare a report that includes, but is not limited to, activities performed for the assessment, a summary of anticipated contaminants and contaminant concentrations at the proposed construction site, and recommendations for appropriate handling of any contaminated materials during construction. These recommendations shall be implemented and the site shall be deemed remediated by the appropriate agency (e.g., DTSC, PCDEHS) or the County shall issue a No Further Action (NFA) letter prior to earth disturbance continuing in the vicinity of the contamination.

Conduct a follow-up study in the event that
further review is needed.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
c) If unidentified or suspected contaminated soil or groundwater (stained soil, noxious odors) is encountered during site preparation or construction activities, work shall stop in the area of potential contamination, and the type and extent of contamination shall be identified by an REA or qualified professional. The REA or qualified professional shall prepare a report that includes, but is not limited to, activities performed for the assessment, summary of anticipated contaminants and contaminant concentrations, and recommendations for appropriate handling and disposal. Site preparation or construction activities shall not recommence within the contaminated areas until remediation is complete and a “no further action” letter is obtained from the applicable regulatory agency.

Stop work in the event hazardous materials
are found.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.9-4: The proposed project could be
located on a site which is included on
a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 (Cortese List)
and, as a result, create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment.

3.9-4(a):

During construction, the contractor shall cease any earthwork activities upon discovery of any suspect soils or groundwater (e.g., petroleum odor and/or discoloration) during construction in accordance with a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan prepared for the project by a qualified environmental consultant and approved by the Placer County Department of Environmental Health Services (PCDEHS). The contractor shall notify the PCDEHS upon discovery of suspect soils or groundwater and retain a qualified environmental firm to collect soil and/or groundwater samples to confirm the level of contamination that may be present. If contamination is found to be present, any further proposed groundbreaking activities within areas of identified or suspected contamination shall be conducted according to a site specific health and safety plan, prepared by a California state licensed professional. Any contaminants identified as exceeding human health risk levels, shall be delineated, removed, and disposed of offsite in compliance with the receiving facilities requirements under the direction of PCDEHS. The contractor shall follow all procedural direction given by PCDEHS and in accordance with the Soil and Groundwater Management Plan prepared for the site to ensure that suspect soils are isolated, protected from runoff, and disposed of in accordance with Section 31303 of the California Vehicle Code and the requirements of the licensed receiving facility.

Stop work in the event suspect soils or
groundwater is found.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
508

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-28 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.9-4(b):

Conduct a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment on the Morse Property at 200 South Dowd Road (APN 021-081-008) in order to sample the underlying soil beneath a concrete saddle that formerly supported an above ground diesel tank and the footprint of a former barn that included an above ground gasoline tank. Follow the recommendations in the Phase II ESA.

Conduct a Phase II ESA. Windsor Cove Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.9-6: The proposed project would
not result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the
project area for a project within the
vicinity of a private airstrip.

3.9-6:

Prior to issuance of the first building permit within 500 feet of the airstrip, the project applicant shall purchase and/or relocate the easement and upon purchase or relocation, abandon the airstrip by filing the appropriate documentation with the Placer County Recorder’s Office.

Purchase and/or relocate airstrip easement. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to building permit
issuance
Placer County Recorder’s
Office, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department

3.9-7: The proposed project could
impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency
evacuation plan.

3.9-7:

Prior to construction, the applicant for any phase of construction shall require the construction contractor(s) to prepare and enforce a traffic control plan to minimize traffic impacts on all roadways at and near the work site affected by construction activities. This traffic control plan shall reduce potential traffic safety hazards and ensure adequate access for emergency responders. The applicant and construction contractor(s) shall coordinate development and implementation of this traffic control plan with the City of Lincoln, as appropriate. To the extent applicable, this traffic control plan shall conform to the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Part 6 (Temporary Traffic Control). The traffic control plan shall provide, but not be limited to, the following elements:
• Circulation and detour plans to minimize impacts on local road circulation during road and lane closures. Flaggers and/or signage shall be used to guide vehicles through and/or around the construction zone.
• Identifying truck routes designated by Placer County, where applicable. Haul routes that minimize truck traffic on local roadways shall be utilized to the extent possible. • Sufficient staging areas for trucks accessing construction zones to minimize the disruption of access to adjacent existing public right-of-ways. • Controlling and monitoring construction vehicle movement through the enforcement of standard construction specifications by onsite inspectors. • Scheduling truck trips outside the peak morning and evening commute hours to the extent possible.
• Limiting the duration of road and lane closures to the extent possible. • Storing all equipment and materials in designated contractor staging areas on or adjacent to the worksite, such that traffic obstruction is minimized. • Implementing roadside safety protocols. Advance “Road Work Ahead” warning and speed control signs (including those informing drivers of State legislated double fines for speed infractions in a construction zone) shall be posted to reduce speeds and provide safe traffic flow through the work zone.
• Coordinating construction administrators of police and fire stations (including all fire protection agencies). Operators shall be notified in advance of the timing, location, and duration of construction activities and the locations of detours and lane closures, where applicable.
• Repairing and restoring affected roadway rights-of way to their original condition after construction is completed.

Prepare and enforce a traffic control plan. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.9-14: The proposed project,
combined with other cumulative
development, could impair the
implementation of or physically
interference with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan.

3.9-14:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-7. See Mitigation Measure

3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-7.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
509

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-29 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.10 Hydrology

3.10-1: Implementation of the
proposed project could violate water
quality standards or waste discharge
requirements.

3.10-1(a):

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan – Project Construction Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City Public Works Department and CVRWQCB, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) detailing measures to control soil erosion and waste discharges during construction. The SWPPP shall include an erosion control and restoration plan, a water quality monitoring plan, a hazardous materials management plan, and post-construction BMPs. The BMPs shall be maintained until all areas disturbed during maintenance have been adequately stabilized.

Prior to the commencement of any construction activities (as they are phased), including grading, the project applicant shall submit of a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Water Resources Control Board for coverage under the 2012-0006-DWQ Permit. i. The specific BMPs that would be incorporated into the SWPPP shall be determined during the final stages of the proposed Project design. The SWPPP shall include specific practices to minimize the potential that pollutants will leave the site during construction. Such practices include establishing designated equipment staging areas, minimizing disturbance of soils and existing vegetation, protection of spoils and soil stockpile areas, and equipment exclusion zones prior to the commencement of any construction activity; designating equipment washout areas; and establishing proper vehicle fuel and maintenance practices.
ii. The applicant shall require contractors using and/or storing hazardous materials, such as vehicle fuels and lubricants, to do so in designated staging areas located away from surface waters according to local, state, and federal regulations as applicable.
iii. All contractors conducting maintenance-related work shall be required to prepare and implement a SWPPP to control soil erosion and waste discharges of other maintenance-related contaminants. The general contractor and subcontractor(s) conducting the work shall be responsible for preparing or implementing the SWPPP, regularly inspecting measures, and maintaining the BMPs in good working order.

Maintenance vehicles and equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and shall be properly maintained to prevent contamination of soil or water from external grease and oil or from leaking hydraulic fluid, fuel, oil, and grease. iv. Methods and materials used for herbicide and pesticide application shall be in accordance with label directions, DWR’s most current guidelines on herbicide and pesticide use, and with laws and regulations administered by the Department of Pesticide Regulation.

Prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City Public
Works Department and the Central Valley,
and submit a Notice of Intent to the State
Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to grading permit
issuance for SWPPP, and
prior to phased construction
for NOI
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department and Central Valley
Regional Water Quality Control
Board (CVRWQCB) for
SWPPP and State Water
Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) for NOI
v. Prior to approval of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall cause the preparation of and implementation of a Spill Prevention and Control Plan (SPCP).

The SPCP shall be accessible on site at all times prior to initiation of maintenance activities, and throughout the activities. The SPCP shall identify the spill control materials that must be fully stocked on site at all times and include a plan for the emergency cleanup of any spills of fuel or other materials that may be released.

Maintenance Yard staff shall be provided the necessary information from the SPCP to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters prior to commencement of construction activities and provide all necessary protocols to contain any spill that might occur. Any such spills, and the cleanup efforts, shall be reported by the on site contractor in an incident report to Placer County Environmental Health as the Certified Unified Program Agency or as directed by Environmental Health. vi. Any in-water work shall be conducted in accordance with requirements as contained in the Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404 permits, California Fish and Game Code section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, and any other applicable regulatory permits or agreements.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
510

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-30 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.10-1(b):

Water Quality BMPs – Project Operation
Prior to approval of final improvement plans, the project applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that meets all the requirements described below. i. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include the proposed water quality facilities and shall be prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.400 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. The Water Quality Management Plan shall be consistent with goals and standards established under federal and state non-point source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations, the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan.
ii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a description of all non-structural BMPs and include Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), or similar regulatory mechanism, to enforce implementation of non-structural BMPs. Nonstructural BMPs shall include, but not be limited to, “good housekeeping” practices for materials storage and waste management, storm drain system stenciling, landscape chemical use guidelines, and street sweeping. iii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities during project operation, which the City shall consider and implement. iv. All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual adopted by the City for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based post-construction BMPs shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs and shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the Section 10, Drainage, of the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and the Placer County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s Stormwater Management Manual. All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the proposed project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs. v. To comply with the requirements of the Placer County Mosquito and Vector Control District, all BMPs shall be designed to discharge all waters within 96 hours of the completion of runoff from a storm event. All graded areas must drain so that no standing water can accumulate for more than 96 hours within water quality facilities. vi. Stormwater runoff from the proposed project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment, oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. Examples of these BMPs include, but are not limited to, grass strips, bioretention, bioswales, composite/treatment train BMPs, detention basins (surface/grass-lined), media filters (mostly sand filters), porous pavement, retention ponds (surface pond with a permanent pool), wetland basins (basins with open water surface), a combined category including both retention ponds and wetland basins, and wetland channels (swales and channels with wetland vegetation). The Water Quality Plan shall include plans for the maintenance of proposed BMPs. No water quality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.

Prepare a Water Quality Management Plan. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to final improvement
plan approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.10-3: Implementation of the
proposed project could substantially
alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result
in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site.

3.10-3:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
511

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-31 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.10-4: Implementation of the
proposed project would substantially
alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or
river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner which could result in flooding
on- or off-site.

3.10-4:

The project applicant(s) shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1and demonstrate that the final design of the onsite drainage improvements will comply with the requirements established in the V5 Drainage Master Plan.

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1 and
demonstrate that final design of the
drainage components will be compliant with
the Village 5 Drainage Master Plan.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

City of Lincoln Public Works
Department, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department

3.10-5: Implementation of the
proposed project could create or
contribute runoff water which would
provide substantial additional sources
of polluted runoff.

3.10-5:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

3.10-7: Implementation of the
proposed project could place within a
100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary, Flood Insurance Rate
Map, or other flood hazard
delineation map, or within a 200-year
floodplain, housing or structures
which would impede or redirect flood
flows.

3.10-7:

Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the City of Lincoln that it has received an encroachment permit from the Central Valley Flood Protection Board (CVFPB) for construction to be located within the 100-year and 200- year flood zone, and any other necessary state or federal permits. As part of the CVFPB permit process, the project applicant must demonstrate that the proposed improvements including storm drain outfalls and bridge supports will not result in an increase in water surface elevation consistent with CVFPB requirements as described in the California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Waters, Division 1, Central Valley Flood Protection Board, Article 8 Standards, including Sections 113 and 128, Bridges. Also, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall review plans for compliance with Chapter

15.32, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Lincoln Municipal Code and the City of Lincoln, Department of Public Works, Design Criteria and Procedures Manual, to confirm that proposed bridges, as designed, would not substantially impede or redirect flood flows.

The City Engineer shall confirm that any proposed bridge is constructed in accordance with the approved plans.

Demonstrate to the City that the applicant
has received a CVFPB encroachment
permit.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to grading permit
issuance
CVFPB, City of Lincoln Public
Works Department, City of
Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.10-8: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative violations of water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements by increasing runoff,
providing additional sources of
polluted runoff, or otherwise
degrading water quality.

3.10-8:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

3.10-10: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative substantial alteration of
the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result
in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site.

3.10-10:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

3.11 Land Use

3.11-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would conflict with
adjacent land uses.

3.11-1:

Where residential uses would be located adjacent to parcels where agricultural operations are permitted, including livestock grazing and/or confinement, the applicant shall provide to all homebuyers notice in a transfer deed regarding the Agricultural Overlay District and required buffers and/or setbacks, as well as agricultural operations and potential nuisance activities that could occur on lands adjacent to the homesite. The applicant shall provide the City with draft notice language to be included in each deed prior to pulling the first building permit.

Provide notice in a transfer deed regarding
the Agricultural Overlay District and required
buffers, setbacks, and potential agricultural
operations and nuisance activities that could
occur. Provide draft language for the City to
include within each deed.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to building permit
issuance
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
512

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-32 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.11-2: Implementation of the
proposed project would create
conflicting land uses within the Plan
Area.

3.11-2:
i) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.

During the design review process, the applicant shall adhere to the following measures to reduce impacts from light and glare:
a) All light standards shall be shielded and directed downward so that light shall not emit higher than a horizontal level.
b) Reflective surfaces of multi-story buildings facing streets, open spaces, parks, and residential neighborhoods shall be oriented to avoid generating glare that could create a nuisance or safety hazard.
c) For parks or other facilities anticipated to include nighttime activities, the site and placement of overhead lighting shall be designed to minimize exposure of adjacent properties to spillover light and minimize the amount of light that would be visible above the horizontal plane of the light fixture. d) Normal operating hours for lighting related to nighttime recreational activities shall be until 10:00 p.m. on Sunday through Thursday and on Friday and Saturday until 11:00 p.m. to reduce the disruption to adjacent properties. to reduce the disruption to adjacent properties. Special events that would require lighting beyond normal operating hours would be subject to a permit to be issued by the City.
ii) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.11-1. iii) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-6, which requires as follows:

Depending on the layout of the proposed loading docks, barriers that completely block line-of-sight between the loading docks and the nearest residential dwelling may not be feasible.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4. See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.
b) Limit heavy truck deliveries to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. unless a site-specific acoustical study prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director or Chief Building Official concludes that deliveries outside of this timeframe would not adversely affect sensitive receptors. c) The use of loudspeakers and similar devices used within parks shall be prohibited outside the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. d) Commercial loading docks located within 100 feet of existing or proposed residences shall be positioned in areas shielded from view of adjacent noisesensitive uses by intervening commercial buildings to the degree feasible. If required to reduce noise to acceptable levels, solid noise barriers shall be constructed at the boundary of commercial uses with loading docks and have a minimum height sufficient to intercept line-of-sight between heavy trucks and the affected area of the noise-sensitive uses.
e) Signs shall be posted prohibiting idling of delivery trucks to 5 minutes or less Attachment 9 Exhibit B
513

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-33 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.12 Noise

3.12-1: Construction of the proposed
project could temporarily increase
ambient noise levels.

3.12-1:

The City shall ensure construction contractors for each project phase comply with the following mitigation measures:
a) Construction hours shall be limited to those allowed in the City’s Public Facilities Improvement Standards between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday If construction is necessary on Sunday and Holidays the applicant shall submit a written request to the Director of Public Works or City Engineer, as applicable, 72-hours prior to the desired construction. If work is allowed outside aforementioned work hours, the applicant shall have a copy of the written approval available at the work site.
b) All heavy construction equipment and all stationary noise sources (such as diesel generators) shall have manufacturer-installed mufflers. c) Equipment warm up areas, water tanks and equipment storage areas shall not be located closer than 200 feet from existing residences.
d) Applicant shall provide two weeks advanced notice to all residences located within 300 feet of construction activities, including the approximate start date and duration of such compaction activities.
e) Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for proposed project construction shall be hydraulically or electrically powered where available to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. Where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves shall be used where available; this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. f) Appropriately sized noise barriers or shielding shall be erected for construction work involving heavy duty construction equipment if occurring within 300 feet of receptors for an extended period of time (more than 2 weeks).

Abide by construction requirements per the
City
(Full Specific Plan and
Area A)
Construction contractors During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.12-2: Construction of the proposed
project would result in exposure of
persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels.

3.12-2:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

3.12-3: Implementation of the
proposed project would expose
noise-sensitive land uses to
transportation noise levels in excess
of the City of Lincoln General Plan
noise standard or result in a
substantial permanent increase in
ambient transportation-related noise
above existing levels.

3.12-3:

Prior to approval of the tentative subdivision map (TSM) for any residential uses located adjacent to Dowd Road (between Mavis Avenue and Nicolaus Road), Mavis Road (between Dowd Road and Nelson Lane), Old Nelson Lane (between Moore Road and SR 65) and SR 65 (between Wise Road and south of Nelson Lane), the TSM applicant shall submit to the City an acoustical study demonstrating that noise attenuation features included in the project would reduce outdoor and interior noise levels to less than the City’s 60 dBA Ldn and 45 dBA Ldn noise standards, respectively. The noise study shall identify the measures to be utilized and the noise attenuation attributable to each feature.

Noise attenuating features may include, but are not limited to:
a) Construct noise barriers (walls and/or berms), as appropriate on a site-specific basis, to reduce traffic noise levels at noise-sensitive land uses, which have been found to be significantly impacted by traffic noise. A concrete cinderblock noise barrier must completely block line-of-sight between the source and receptor, and can reduce traffic noise levels by at least 10 dB. Any noise walls shall be landscaped with vines (to be fully covered within three years) and shall be landscaped in accordance with the General Development Plan (GDP).
b) Design and construct residential buildings adjacent to Dowd Road (between Mavis Avenue and Nicolaus Road), Mavis Road (between Dowd Road and Nelson Lane), Old Nelson Lane (between Moore Road and SR 65) and SR 65 (between Wise Road and south of Nelson Lane) so that their external activity areas are not within line-ofsight of these roadways. This could result in noise reductions of at least 3 dB. c) Repaving impacted roadways with “quiet” pavement types such as rubberized concrete. Roadways constructed with rubberized concrete can resulted in a net decrease in traffic noise levels of approximately 4 dB compared to that created by conventional asphalt.

Submit an acoustical study demonstrating
that noise attenuation features included in
the project would reduce outdoor and
interior noise levels to less than the City’s
60 dBA Ldn and 45 dBA Ldn noise
standards, respectively
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to approval of the
tentative subdivision map
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
514

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-34 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party d) The applicant shall conduct an acoustical analysis to confirm that if the materials to be used for residential building construction would reduce interior noise levels to 45 dBA Ldn. If the analysis determines that additional noise insulation features are required, the acoustical analysis shall identify the type of noise insulation features that would be required to reduce the interior noise levels to 45 dBA Ldn, and the applicant shall incorporate these features into the building design.

3.12-4: The proposed project could
result in exposure of people residing
or working at the project site to
excessive noise levels from a project
located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a
public or public use airport.

3.12-4:

If a daycare center is located in Compatibility Zone C1, the applicant shall conduct an acoustical analysis to confirm that the materials to be used for construction of the commercial building housing the daycare center would result in an interior to exterior noise reduce of at least 20 dB. If the analysis determines that additional noise insulation features are required, the acoustical analysis shall identify the type of noise insulation features that would be require to result in an exterior to interior noise reduce of at least 20 dB, and the applicant shall incorporate these features into the building design.

Conduct an acoustical analysis in the event
that a daycare center is located in Lincoln
Regional Airport Compatibility Zone C1
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.12-5: Implementation of the
proposed project would expose
people residing or working in the
proposed project area to excessive
noise levels for a project within the
vicinity of a private airstrip.

3.12-5:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.9-6.

3.9-6
Prior to issuance of the first building permit within 500 feet of the airstrip, the project applicant shall purchase and/or relocate the easement and upon purchase or relocation, abandon the airstrip by filing the appropriate documentation with the Placer County Recorder’s Office.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-6. Full Specific Plan and
Area A
See Mitigation Measure

3.9-6.

See Mitigation Measure

3.9-6.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-6.

3.12-6: Implementation of the
proposed project would expose onsite noise-sensitive land uses to noise generated by commercial,
educational and recreational activities
in excess of the City of Lincoln
General Plan noise standard or result
in an increase in ambient noise

3.12-6:

During individual phase design preparation, the applicant shall implement the following measures to assure that interior and exterior noise levels from stationary sources are below the City’s standards of 60 dBA Ldn outdoor and 45 dBA Ldn indoor, respectively:
a) The proposed land uses shall be designed so that on-site mechanical equipment (e.g., HVAC units, compressors, generators) and area-source operations (e.g., loading docks, parking lots, and recreational-use areas) are located no closer than 120 feet from the nearest residential dwelling or provided shielding from nearby noise sensitive land uses to meet City noise standards. Shielding must have a minimum height sufficient to completely block line-of-sight between the on-site noise source and the nearest residential dwelling to meet the City noise standards. Based on the size and placement of the HVAC units (i.e., ground level or roof top), barrier heights may range between three to six feet. Depending on the layout of the proposed loading docks, barriers that completely block line-of-sight between the loading docks and the nearest residential dwelling may not be feasible. b) Limit heavy truck deliveries to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. unless a site-specific acoustical study prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director or Chief Building Official concludes that deliveries outside of this timeframe would not adversely affect sensitive receptors.
c) The use of loudspeakers and similar devices used within parks shall be prohibited outside the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday.
d) Commercial loading docks located within 100 feet of existing or proposed residences shall be positioned in areas shielded from view of adjacent noise-sensitive uses by intervening commercial buildings to the degree feasible. If required to reduce noise to acceptable levels, solid noise barriers shall be constructed at the boundary of commercial uses with loading docks and have a minimum height sufficient to intercept line-of-sight between heavy trucks and the affected area of the noisesensitive uses. e) Signs shall be posted prohibiting idling of delivery trucks to 5 minutes or less.

Implement the noise mitigation measures Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to individual phase
design implementation
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.12-7: Construction of the proposed
project, including other cumulative
growth, would temporarily add to
cumulative noise levels in the vicinity
of the proposed project site.

3.12-7:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
515

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-35 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.12-8: Construction of the proposed
project, combined with other
cumulative growth, would temporarily
add to cumulative groundborne
vibration levels in the vicinity of the
proposed project site.

3.12-8:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-2. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-2.

3.12-9: Increases in traffic from the
proposed project, in combination with
other development, could result in
cumulatively considerable noise
increases.

3.12-9:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-3.

3.14 Public Services

3.14-4: The proposed project could
result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered parks or
recreation facilities or the need for
new or physically altered parks or
recreation facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable performance
objectives for parks and recreation
services.

3.14-4:

If fewer than 38.7 acres of the Regional Sports Park are available for public use, the project applicant shall either (i) provide the required additional active recreational park land; or (ii) pay the In Lieu Fee for park and recreational facilities as set forth in Lincoln Municipal Code section 17.32.010 for the difference between the demand for active recreational park (116.7 acres) and the active recreational parkland provided.

Agree to build or pay In Lieu Fee to
compensate for required additional active
recreational park land.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to issuance of a
building permit
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.15 Transportation

3.15-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at intersections under
the City of Lincoln’s jurisdiction
operating at an acceptable LOS
under existing conditions.

3.15-1:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following improvements.

These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, PFE credits would be given to the constructing party. Alternatively, the City may require the project applicants to construct the improvements and provide them with a right of reimbursement from third parties who also benefit from the improvements. The development agreement between the City and project applicants shall specify the timing of the fair share payment or construction of these improvements, with the required timing prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study to be funded by the project applicants.

If, in the alternative to paying the applicable PFE fees, the project applicant(s) are required to construct improvements, the following improvements would be required to restore operations to an acceptable level at each intersection. a) Nelson Lane / Nicolaus Road (#10):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. To achieve LOS C operations, it may be necessary to provide protected left-turn movements and a right-turn overlap phase for eastbound right turn movements. Northbound U-turn movements would need to be prohibited to allow for the eastbound right-turn overlap phase. Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE. - Restripe the southbound approach to provide the following lane configurations:
i. One left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through-right turn lane - Reconfigure the south leg of the intersection to provide the following lane configurations:
i. Two northbound left turn pocket lanes
ii. One northbound through lane
iii. One northbound trap-right turn lane
iv. Two southbound receiving lanes
- Reconfigure the east leg of the intersection to provide a second westbound leftturn lane - Reconfigure the west leg of the intersection to include the following:

Pay fair share costs improvements outlined
included in the City of Lincoln Public
Facilities Element (PFE) fee program. Or,
the project applicant could construct the
requested improvements and, under the
City’s direction, be given a right of
reimbursement from third parties who
benefit from the said improvements.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
516

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-36 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party i. Restripe the eastbound shared through-right turn lane into a dedicated rightturn lane. This would result in one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one right-turn lane.
ii. Add a second westbound receiving lane
b) Airport Road / Nicolaus Road (#11):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. If necessary to achieve LOS C operations, provide protected phasing for left-turn movements. Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE.
- Widen the southbound approach to add a southbound left-turn pocket - Widen the south leg of the intersection to include the following:
i. One northbound left turn pocket lane
ii. One northbound through lane
iii. One northbound channelized free right turn lane
iv. Two southbound receiving lanes
- Widen the east leg of the intersection to include the following:
i. Two westbound left turn lanes (one trap lane; one pocket lane) ii. Restripe the existing westbound lane to a through-right lane iii. Two eastbound receiving lanes (one from the eastbound through lane and one from the northbound free right-turn lane)
- Widen the eastbound approach to include one left-turn pocket lane, one through lane, and one-right turn pocket lane.
c) Dowd Road / Nicolaus Road (#13):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. If necessary to achieve LOS C operations, provide protected phasing for left-turn movements. Signalizing this intersection is identified in the Village 5 Specific Plan, and is included in the updated PFE.
- Widen the southbound approach to add a southbound left-turn pocket - Widen the south leg of the intersection to include the following improvements:
i. One northbound left turn pocket lane
ii. One northbound through lane
iii. One northbound trap right turn lane
iv. Two southbound receiving lanes
- Widen the east leg of the intersection to include the following improvements:
i. Two westbound left turn lanes (one trap lane; one pocket lane) ii. Restripe the existing westbound lane to a through-right lane - Widen the eastbound approach to include one left-turn pocket lane, one shared through-right turn lane.
d) Fiddyment Road / Moore Road (#15):
- Widen the southbound approach to add a southbound right-turn pocket e) Dowd Road / Moore Road (#22):
- Change the traffic control to side-street stop control for Moore Road, and free movements on Dowd Road (existing configuration is free movements on Moore Road and side-street stop control for Dowd Road).
f) Lakeside Drive / Nicolaus Road (#32):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE.

Additional mitigation to reduce impacts of Mitigation Measures 3.15-1(b) and (c) to intersections #11 and #13.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
517

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-37 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Option 1:
g) The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the intersections of Airport Road/Nicolaus Road (#11) and Dowd Road/Nicolaus Road (#13). In addition to compliance with Mitigation Measures 3.15-1(b) and (c), the City shall cause one of the following measures to be taken prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study at each location to be funded by the project applicant(s):
i. The project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the City staff to ensure signal phasing times would allow adequate time for cyclists to cross through the widened intersections during green and amber signal phases; or ii. The project applicants’ intersection designs shall eliminate free right-turn movements in exchange for right-turn overlap phases or dual right turn lanes to serve high right-turn traffic volumes. Any dual right-turn lanes shall be designed to ensure adequate visibility of pedestrians, including any use of a channelized right-turn lane for the inside right-turn lane.

Option 2:
g) The project applicant(s) shall apply to the Community Development Director for a determination as to whether the recommended intersection widening conflicts with the City’s Policy T-2.3 and T-5.3 to achieve a traffic design to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The Community Development Director may determine that an exception to the LOS C standard in Policy T-2.3 is warranted.

3.15-3: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at future City of Lincoln
intersections in Village 5.

3.15-3:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the future Nelson Lane / Mavis Road intersection (#40) and shall cause the following improvements to be constructed prior to the service level degrading to LOS D:
• Southbound: channelize the right-turn lane and add a merge lane on westbound Mavis Road to allow “free” right-turn operations
• Eastbound: widen the eastbound approach to include a third left turn lane • Westbound: channelize the right-turn lane and add a merge lane on northbound Nelson Lane to allow “free” right-turn operations.

Monitor conditions at Nelson Lane/Mavis
Road intersection and construction
improvements.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to service level
reaching LOS D
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department
The development agreement between the City and project applicants shall specify the timing of the construction of these improvements, with the required timing prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study to be funded by the project applicants.

Additional mitigation to reduce impacts to Intersection #40 if widened:

Option 1:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the intersection of Nelson Lane/Mavis Road (#40). In addition to compliance with Mitigation Measures 3.15-3, the City shall cause one of the following measures to be taken prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study at each location to be funded by the project applicant(s):
a) The project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the City staff to ensure signal phasing times would allow adequate time for cyclists to cross through the widened intersections during green and amber signal phases; or
b) The project applicants’ intersection designs shall eliminate free right-turn movements in exchange for right-turn overlap phases or dual right turn lanes to serve high rightturn traffic volumes. Any dual right-turn lanes shall be designed to ensure adequate visibility of pedestrians, including any use of a channelized right-turn lane for the inside right-turn lane.

Option 2:

The project applicant(s) may apply to the Community Development Director for a determination as to whether the recommended intersection widening conflicts with the City’s Policy T-2.3 and T-5.3 to achieve a traffic design to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The Community Development Director may determine that an exception to the LOS C standard in Policy T-2.3 is warranted.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
518

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-38 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.15-4: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at intersections under
the County of Placer’s jurisdiction.

3.15-4:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to restore vehicle traffic operations to an acceptable LOS at each intersection.
a) Fiddyment Road / Athens Avenue (#16):
- Widening of the northbound approach to include a right-turn pocket lane - Widening of the southbound approach to include a left-turn pocket lane - Signalization at the intersection with a protected southbound left-turn movement.

There is no funding program in place for these improvements. Accordingly, the project applicant(s) shall obtain cost estimates for these improvements and determine its/their fair share payments. Once the fair share has been determined, the project applicant(s) shall pay that fair share to the City to ensure the payment goes to the above-referenced improvements.
b) Fiddyment Road / W. Sunset Boulevard (#18):
- Widening of the northbound approach to include a left-turn pocket lane - Signalization at the intersection with a protected northbound left-turn movement.

Pay fair share improvements for Fiddyment
Road/Athens Avenue and Fiddyment Road/
West Sunset Boulevard intersections.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
There is no funding program in place for these improvements. Accordingly, the project applicant(s) shall obtain cost estimates for these improvements and determine its/their fair share payments. Once the fair share has been determined, the project applicant(s) shall pay that fair share to the City to ensure the payment goes to the above-referenced improvements.

3.15-6: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at intersections
maintained by Caltrans.

3.15-6:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the construction of a new interchange at SR 65 / Nelson Lane (#3), as supported by Lincoln General Plan Policy T-2.9. The timing of these payments is outlined in the development agreement. As described in Section 3.15.2, the City of Lincoln is in the process of updating its PFE fee program. This interchange is included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, the project applicants shall pay their fair share towards these improvements through the City of Lincoln’s updated PFE fee program and ensure that they are constructed prior to the service level degrading to an unacceptable LOS F.

To initiate the Caltrans project development process towards implementing the new interchange, the project applicant shall fund the preparation of a Project Study Report – Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) document for a new interchange at SR 65/Nelson Lane (#3) in coordination with the City of Lincoln and Caltrans. The Caltrans project development process will determine the ultimate configuration of the new interchange and ensure that the ultimate configuration provides acceptable operations (i.e., LOS) based on Caltrans standards. Through the Caltrans project development process, the following intersection control options may be considered in accordance with Caltrans’ Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) policy:
• Unsignalized (side street stop controlled);
• Roundabout – Single or multi-lane;
• Diverging diamond interchange;
• Signalized spread diamond;
• Signalized single point urban interchange; or
• Signalized partial cloverleaf.

While the PSR-PDS process would determine the ultimate configuration of the interchange, the City and project applicant assumed a six-lane signalized partial cloverleaf interchange for this analysis based on the available footprint and the planned circulation network identified in the Village 5 Specific Plan. Since the six-lane partial cloverleaf provides the greatest capacity and has the largest footprint of the options listed above, it was determined that this configuration would verify whether an interchange would adequately mitigate the project’s impact on traffic operations (i.e., if a six-lane partial cloverleaf does not meet LOS standards, additional mitigation may be necessary).

Analysis presented in Table 3.15-23 shows that the six-lane signalized partial cloverleaf interchange provides acceptable operations with the following lane configurations at the interchange ramp terminal intersections:

Pay fair share improvements for SR 65/
Nelson Lane interchange.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
519

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-39 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party • SR 65 Northbound Ramps / Nelson Lane intersection:
i. Northbound SR 65 off-ramp: one left-turn lane, one shared left-right turn lane, and one right turn lane
ii. Northbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the northbound SR 65 loop on-ramp
iii. Southbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the northbound SR 65 slip on-ramp
• SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Nelson Lane intersection:
i. Southbound SR 65 off-ramp: one left-turn lane and one right-turn lane ii. Northbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the southbound SR 65 slip on-ramp
iii. Southbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the southbound SR 65 loop on-ramp

3.15-13: The proposed project could
result in temporary impacts to
transportation and traffic when
construction activity occurs within the
Village 5 Specific Plan site.

3.15-13:

Prior to the beginning of construction for each project phase, project applicants shall prepare a detailed Construction Traffic Management Plan subject to review and approval by the City Department of Public Works, in consultation with Caltrans, affected transit providers, and local emergency service providers. The Traffic Management Plan shall ensure that acceptable operating conditions are maintained on local roadways and freeway facilities. At a minimum, the plan shall include:
• The number of truck trips, time, and day of street closures • Time of day of arrival and departure of trucks
• Provision of a truck circulation pattern
• Identification of detour routes and signing plan for street closures, if necessary • Maintain safe and efficient access routes for emergency vehicles • Manual traffic control when necessary
• Proper advance warning and posted signage concerning street closures • Provisions for pedestrian and bicycle safety
A copy of the Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted to local emergency response agencies and transit providers, and these agencies shall be notified at least 30 days before the commencement of construction that would partially or fully obstruct roadways.

Prepare a detailed Construction Traffic
Management Plan.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction Caltrans, City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-14: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the City of
Lincoln’s jurisdiction operating at an
acceptable LOS under cumulative no
project conditions.

3.15-14:

Intersections 12, 14, 26, 32 and 33 have been incorporated into the City’s update PFE program for transportation. As a result, the project applicants may mitigate by either paying their fair share cost towards the following improvements, or in the alternative to paying fees, the City may require project applicant(s) to construct the improvements identified in below. The development agreement between the City and project applicants shall specify the timing of the fair share payment or construction of these improvements, with the required timing prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study to be funded by the project applicants:

In the alternative to paying fees, the project applicant(s) shall construct the following improvements to restore operations to an acceptable level at each intersection. a) Joiner Parkway / Nicolaus Road (#12):
- Restripe the northbound shared through-left turn lane to be a dedicated left-turn lane
- Restripe the southbound shared through-left turn lane to be a dedicated through lane
- Re-time the signal to provide protected northbound and southbound left-turn phasing.

Pay fair share fees or construct necessary
improvements for Intersections 12, 14, 26,
32, and 33.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
b) Old Nelson Lane / Moore Road (#14):
- Widen Moore Road to provide an eastbound left-turn pocket and a two-way leftturn lane to allow two-stage gap acceptance for southbound left-turn movements.

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
520

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-40 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party c) Joiner Parkway / Ferrari Ranch Road (#26):
- Widen the northbound Joiner Parkway approach to include a third left-turn lane - To provide space to receive the third northbound left-turn lane on westbound Ferrari Ranch Road, remove the channelized free right-turn lane from southbound Joiner Parkway
d) Lakeside Drive / Nicolaus Road (#32):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met, as stated in Mitigation

3.15-1(f). Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous City of Lincoln PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE. e) Teal Hollow Drive / Nicolaus Road (#33):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met.

Additional mitigation to reduce impacts to intersection #26 if widened:

Option 1:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the intersection of Joiner Parkway/Ferrari Ranch Road (#26). In addition to compliance with Mitigation Measures 3.15-14, the City shall cause one of the following measures to be taken prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study at each location to be funded by the project applicant(s):
f) The project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the City staff to ensure signal phasing times would allow adequate time for cyclists to cross through the widened intersections during green and amber signal phases; or
g) The project applicants’ intersection designs shall eliminate free right-turn movements in exchange for right-turn overlap phases or dual right turn lanes to serve high rightturn traffic volumes. Any dual right-turn lanes shall be designed to ensure adequate visibility of pedestrians, including any use of a channelized right-turn lane for the inside right-turn lane.

Option 2:
f) The project applicant(s) may apply to the Community Development Director for a determination as to whether the recommended intersection widening conflicts with the City’s Policy T-2.3 and T-5.3 to achieve a traffic design to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The Community Development Director may determine that an exception to the LOS C standard in Policy T-2.3 is warranted.

3.15-15: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the City of
Lincoln’s jurisdiction operating at an
unacceptable LOS under cumulative
no project conditions.

3.15-15:
a) For the cumulative impacts to Airport Road / Nicolaus Road (#11), the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(b) and (g). See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).
b) For the cumulative impacts to Fiddyment Road / Moore Road (#15), the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(d). See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).
c) For the cumulative impacts to Dowd Road / Moore Road (#22), the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(e). See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).
d) For the cumulative impacts to Caledon Circle / Ferrari Ranch Road (#25), the project applicant shall pay their fair share cost towards the following improvements. These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program:
- Provide an overlap phase on the northbound right-turn movement.

Pay fair share cost towards Intersection 25. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-16: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at future City
of Lincoln intersections in Village 5.

3.15-16:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the future Dowd Road / Mavis Road (#37) and Nelson Lane / Mavis Road (#40) intersections, and shall cause the following improvements to be constructed prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, subject to reimbursement to the constructing entity by those benefitting from the improvements:
a) Dowd Road / Mavis Road (#37):
- To reduce the average vehicle delay, the following improvements are necessary to provide LOS C operations at Dowd Road / Mavis Road:
i. Provide two southbound left-turn lanes
ii. Channelize the westbound right-turn lane and provide a receiving merge lane on northbound Dowd Road to allow free right-turn movements Monitor traffic conditions at Intersections 37
and 40, and subsequently cause
improvements to be constructed.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
Prior to LOS D at
Intersections 37 and 40
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
521

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-41 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party b) Nelson Lane / Mavis Road (#40):
- Implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-3.

3.15-17: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the County of
Placer’s jurisdiction

3.15-17:
a) For the intersection at Fiddyment Road / Athens Avenue (#16) and Fiddyment Road/ W. Sunset Boulevard (#18), the project applicants shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-4 and widening of Fiddyment Road consistent with Mitigation Measure

3.15-20.

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-4 for
Intersection #16.

See Implement Mitigation
Measure 3.15-4.

See Implement Mitigation
Measure 3.15-4.
b) For the intersection at Fiddyment Road / E. Catlett Road (#17), the project applicant shall pay their fair share costs towards the following improvements:
- Widening the northbound and southbound approaches to include two through lanes; this is consistent with Mitigation Measure 3.15-20(a). - Adding a northbound left-turn pocket.
- Signalizing the intersection with protected northbound left-turn phasing - Widening the eastbound approach to include a left-turn pocket and right-turn lane. Provide an overlap phase for the eastbound right-turn movement.

Pay fair share costs towards required
improvements for Intersection #17.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-18: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the City of
Roseville’s jurisdiction.

3.15-18:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at each of the following intersections:
a) Fiddyment Road / Blue Oaks Boulevard (#19):
- An overlap phase on the southbound right-turn movement. This improvement would mitigate the project’s incremental contribution to delay at this intersection. b) Fiddyment Road / Baseline Road (#21):
- An overlap phase on the southbound right-turn movement. This improvement would mitigate the project’s incremental contribution to delay at this intersection.

Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for Intersections #19 and 21.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-19: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections maintained by Caltrans.

3.15-19:
a) For SR 65 / Nelson Lane (#3a and #3b), implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-6. See Mitigation Measure

3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-6.
b) For SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Ferrari Ranch Road (#4):

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at SR 65 Southbound Ramps/ Ferrari Ranch Road. These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, the project applicant shall pay their fair share through the City of Lincoln’s updated PFE fee program:
- Widening the eastbound approach to include a dedicated right-turn lane; channelize the eastbound right-turn movement onto the southbound on-ramp to allow free right-turn movements.

Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for Intersection #4.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
c) SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Twelve Bridges Drive (#9):

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Twelve Bridges Drive. These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, the project applicant shall pay their fair share through the City of Lincoln’s updated PFE fee program:
- Restriping the northbound off-ramp converting the existing shared through-right turn lane to a shared through-left turn lane
Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for Intersection #9.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
Attachment 9 Exhibit B
522

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-42 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.15-20: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels on study
roadway segments in Placer County.

3.15-20:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost to the City for the following recommended improvements to restore vehicle traffic operations to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at each roadway segment.
a) Widening Fiddyment Road from Athens Avenue to Moore Road from a two-lane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided arterial.
b) Widening Fiddyment Road from Roseville City Limits to Athens Avenue from a twolane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided arterial. c) Widening Athens Road from Fiddyment Road to Foothills Boulevard from a two-lane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided arterial.

Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for widening at:
-Fiddyment Road from Athens Avenue to
Moore Road
- Athens Road from Fiddyment Road to
Foothills Boulevard
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-22: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels on study
freeway facilities maintained by
Caltrans as well as roadways in the
City of Rocklin.

3.15-22:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share of improvements for impacts to SR 65.

The fair share payment shall consist of the appropriate SPRTA Fees to help fund improvements to SR 65. A number of different improvements may be considered by Caltrans and the City of Lincoln to restore operations to acceptable levels at the impacted locations. Improvements to SR 65 could take the form of auxiliary lanes between interchanges, an additional general purpose or High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction of SR 65, ramp metering, additional deceleration/acceleration areas at affected ramps, increased parallel street capacity, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) solutions, and other options. This mitigation measure would require the project applicant(s) to pay their fair share of future improvements to SR 65. SPRTA funding for the SR 65 widening project is currently estimated to be $67 million of the estimated total cost of $95 million for the project.

Pay fair share costs to fund SPRTA Fees, in
order to help fund improvements to SR 65.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.16 Utilities and Infrastructure

3.16-2: Implementation of the
proposed project would result in an
increased demand for water supply
that could result in the need for new
or expanded treatment, storage or
conveyance facilities.

3.16-2:

Prior to the approval of the Ophir WTP or Foothill Phase II WTP connection to the City’s water system or demand of 1.7 gpm within the Plan Area, whichever occurs first, the City shall ensure the following improvements or equally effective improvements for treatment and distribution have been completed and are operational:
a) The Ophir Water Treatment Plant is completed and operational at 10 mgd. b) The Village 7 18-inch transmission main is installed and connected to a third POC provided in the Plan Area.

Ensure the following improvements or
equally effective improvements for
treatment and distribution have been
completed and are operational for Ophir
Water Treatment Plant and the Village 7
18-inch transmission main connection to the
Village 5 Plan Area.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to approval of the Ophir WTP or Foothill
Phase II WTP connection to
the City’s water system or
demand of 1.7 gpm within
the Plan Area, whichever
occurs first
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department

3.16-7: The proposed project would
contribute to cumulative increases in
demand for water supply that could
result in the need for new or
expanded treatment, storage or
conveyance facilities.

3.16-7:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure 3.16-2(a). See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

Attachment 9 Exhibit B
523

LINCOLN AIRPORT

LINCOLN AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY ZONES

20.04 AC
LSC 2
LSC 1

0.60 AC

0.74 AC
IOD 2

4.49 AC
VCE

26.39 AC
OS 1

4.00 AC
PARK

0.97 AC
N89°35'54"E 1475.47'
N25°05'10"E
100.00'
N25°05'10"E
100.00'
N25°05'10"E
100.00'
N25°05'10"E
100.00'
C6
C5
L2 L1
N89°34'13"E 1475.47'
N00°41'49"W 2656.74'
N00°41'49"W 2657.46'

LINCOLN AIRPORT

COMPATIBILITY ZONES

COMPATIBILITY ZONE
D
C1

LINCOLN AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY ZONE
C1
D
C2
C2
C1
Δ=18°38'46" R=1949.91' L=634.57'
D

18.44 AC
101.13'
1477.53' 121.31'
952.91' 389.81' 918.95' LSC 5

0.63 AC
LSC 11

0.37 AC
LSC 8

0.47 AC
LSC 3 0.43 AC
L15

FUTURE NELSON LANE
LSC 4 0.76 AC VLDR
IOD 11.78 AC
OS 2
Δ=16°34'29" R=1920.00' L=555.42' Δ=16°42'48" R=1950.00' L=568.82' Δ=17°08'45" R=2050.00' L=613.46' Δ=17°16'03" R=2080.00' L=626.85' 1711.36' 869.60' (CITY)
LSC 7

0.02 AC
L=146.14' R=1954.40' Δ=4°17'03"
L=143.89' R=1922.72' Δ=4°17'16" 1.93 AC OS 3
LSC 6

0.04 AC
LSC 9

0.05 AC
LSC 10

0.05 AC
C1
C2
N65°51'36"E 31.62'
N66°11'47"E 22.18'
N78°54'13"E 336.12'
N71°57'37"W 191.09'
N15°56'40"E

20.11'
N34°39'27"E

29.70'
N20°51'48"E

31.21'
N83°55'27"W

56.18'
N77°10'44"E

10.60'
N57°24'42"E

9.13'
N39°00'38"E

34.17'
N58°18'59"E

34.97'
N00°17'25"W 270.00'
N89°18'11"E
139.81'
Δ=28°11'36"
L=32.48' R=66.00'
C3 C4
C7
N00°42'20"W

36.46'
N00°42'19"W

21.49'
N89°30'47"E

79.45' N00°29'13"W 36.00'
N00°41'49"W 1129.73'
N00°40'17"W
205.82'
N89°42'35"E
114.89'
N69°58'14"W

37.44'
N53°26'40"E

51.21'
N86°23'33"W

86.28'
Δ=21°09'40"
L=16.62'R=45.00'
N12°08'45"W

5.00'
Δ=30°09'58"
L=26.32'R=50.00'
Δ=18°18'38"
L=9.27'R=29.00'
N89°42'35"E 333.04'
N87°37'01"W

29.98'
N00°41'49"W 998.32'
N00°41'49"W 998.32'
104.98' N89°18'11"E 50.00'
N00°41'29"W

29.23'
N89°18'29"E

30.00' N44°50'32"W

74.43'
C32
N89°35'54"E 248.32'
N89°35'54"E 259.23'
N86°46'18"E
150.20'
N87°15'13"W 200.30'
N89°42'35"E
146.70'
N89°35'54"E

93.26'
N00°24'06"W
100.90'

51.15' 49.75' N86°34'50"E 6.32'
C8
C9 C10
C11 C12
C13
N89°35'54"E
101.95'
OS 7 1.84 AC
OS 5 0.13 AC
L3
L5 L4
L6
C14
C15
C16
C17 C18
L7 L8
Δ=9°32'14"
L=33.79'
R=203.00'
Δ=9°31'10"
L=32.73'
R=197.00'
N00°25'10"W 149.89'
N89°35'54"E 55.75'
N00°41'49"W 25.60'
N89°35'55"E 241.18'
N46°44'32"E

17.50'
Δ=20°21'51"
L=12.08' R=34.00'
Δ=63°12'09"
L=50.74' R=46.00'
N89°18'11"E

55.67'
N89°30'45"E

54.00'
N89°30'47"E

40.00'
N00°42'19"W
136.78'
N00°42'19"W
159.11'
N38°37'17"E

81.20'
N89°18'11"E

69.24'
N53°03'22"W

51.83'
N89°35'54"E

99.33'
N85°17'34"W
123.53'
N89°35'54"E

7.44'
C19
C27
C20
C21
C22
C23
L11
C24
N00°26'20"W

11.73'
N00°26'20"W

89.88'
L12
L14
L16
L17
L18
L19
L20
N00°26'20"W

89.76'
Δ=87°47'45"
L=39.84'
R=26.00'
Δ=87°47'45"
L=39.84'
R=26.00'
C25 C26 C28
C29
C31 N89°35'55"E 264.37'
N89°35'54"E

83.59'
N84°07'28"W
100.60'
N89°35'54"E

56.09'
N00°40'56"W

55.00'
(CITY)
L=176.90' R=140.00' Δ=72°23'45" L=195.76'
R=1910.00' Δ=5°52'20"
N86°29'21"E
136.28'
N63°54'54"W

79.32'
S03°14'12"W
309.90'
N71°01'50"W 31.75'
N18°58'10"E 56.00'
N71°01'50"W 29.69'
L
=
2 2.8
4' R=3

85.00' Δ
=
3 3°0
9'4
8"
L
=96.4 ' R
=130.0 ' Δ
=
42°30'15" L=145.35' R=773.00' Δ=10°46'25" N43°16'15"W

67.63'
Δ=11°04'44"
L=38.67'
R=200.00'
Δ=7°25'58"
L=28.54'R=220.00'
N69°12'28"W

30.00'
N69°12'28"W

10.00'
N77°37'51"E 346.96'
N65°01'56"W 207.84'
N38°45'28"E

25.08'

5.34 AC
OS 4
(CITY)

0.49 AC
OS 6
L=542.08' R=1920.14' Δ=16°10'31" N69°12'28"W
117.93'
L21 N00°41'49"W 1459.27'
Δ=2°14'00"
L=74.84'
R=1919.89'
N89°42'35"E
257.94'
N55°00'28"W 13.44'
N00°42'19"W 38.61'
N00°42'19"W 14.26'
N34°51'12"E 5.83'
N47°54'04"E 10.61'
N60°16'58"E 13.31'
N68°24'54"E 31.05'
N78°55'39"E 22.80'
N89°44'42"E 38.88'
N81°18'11"E 14.61'
N43°29'51"E 11.43'
N21°29'55"E

37.83'
N89°42'35"E
110.02'
N00°41'49"W

45.85'
Δ=90°24'24"
L=33.14' R=21.00'
N72°01'02"E

38.69'
N10°35'09"E

9.21'
N00°24'05"E

10.29'
N66°17'24"E

8.61'

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5C6C7C8C9
C10
C11
C12C13C14C15C16
RADIUS
1949.53'1920.15'

34.00'

46.00'
2080.00'2050.00'

34.00'

26.00'

30.00'37.50'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'
DELTA
2°50'40"3°04'50"
23°51'00"
137°55'30"
9°50'30"
13°06'10"
23°51'50"93°01'00"37°34'20"37°34'20"90°00'00"56°06'20"33°53'40"87°07'20" 48°10'00"
38°57'20"
LENGTH

96.79'
103.19'

14.15'
110.73'
357.25'
468.81'

14.16'

42.21'

19.67'

24.59'

78.54'

48.96'29.58'

76.03'

42.03'

33.99'

CURVE TABLE
CURVE
C17C18C19C20
C21
C22
C23C24C25C26C27C28C29
C31
C32
RADIUS

37.50'30.00'50.00'50.00'50.00'37.50'30.00'

62.50'

30.00'37.50'50.00'50.00'50.00'

62.50'

54.00'
DELTA
34°41'40"37°34'20"90°02'10"56°37'30"33°24'40"37°34'20"37°34'20"36°18'20"37°34'20"35°23'20"87°46'50"87°46'50"87°46'50"36°22'50"89°42'20" LENGTH

22.71'

19.67'

78.57'

49.41'

29.16'24.59'

19.67'

39.60'

19.67'

23.16'76.60'76.60'76.60'39.68'84.54'

LINE TABLE
LINE
L1
L2L3L4L5L6L7L8
L11

BEARING
N89°34'13"EN89°34'13"E
S89°35'54"W
S0°24'06"ES0°24'06"ES0°24'06"E
N0°24'06"WN0°24'06"W
S0°26'20"E

DISTANCE

30.32'30.36'33.50'

10.05'

25.52'

8.11'

10.05'

58.25'

7.56'

LINE TABLE
LINE
L12L14L15L16L17L18L19L20
L21

BEARING
S89°26'05"W
N0°26'20"W
S0°41'49"E
N0°26'20"W
S0°26'20"ES0°26'20"E
N89°33'40"E
S0°26'20"ES0°41'49"E

DISTANCE

25.00'

10.05'

39.00'63.84'63.78'

10.05'

25.00'

11.78'15.92'

PARKWAY
3rd ST.

MOORE ROAD

NELSON LANE

FIDDYMENT
HWY 65

VICINITY MAP
JOINER

LINCOLN

REGIONAL

AIRPORT
ROAD

NICOLAUSROAD
VILLAGE 7
VILLAGE 5
Windsor
Cove
HWY 65

CITY OF

LINCOLN

CROSSING
FDG
N
W
S
E
0 100' 200' 300'
SCALE 1"=100'
SHEET 1 OF 1
APN: 021-050-011
APN: 021-050-001
APN: 021-049-009
APN: 021-049-003
APN: 021-049-004
APN: 021-049-005
APN: 021-049-006
APN: 021-049-007
APN: 021-028-007 APN: 021-028-003 (CITY OF LINCOLN)
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APN: 021-049-002

FIDDYMENT ROAD
WWTP

MOORE ROAD
AUBURN
RAVINE

TENTATIVE MAP INFORMATION

DEVELOPER/
OWNER:

KUHN KIDS INVESTMENT, LLC
5701 LONE TREE BLVD. SUITE #102
ROCKLIN, CA 95765
ENGINEER/PLANNER:

FRAYJI DESIGN GROUP, INC.
1316 BLUE OAKS BLVD.

ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
(916) 782-3000

ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO.S:

TOTAL ACREAGE: 90.0± AC
EXISTING ZONE: VLDR/VCE/OPEN SPACE/ROWLOT SUMMARY: LARGE LOT AREA PROPOSED ZONE:
021-490-002

VILLAGE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
(VLDR), VILLAGE COUNTRY ESTATES(VCE) (OPEN SPACE) (ROW) VLDR
VCE
OS 1
OS 2OS 3OS 4
OS 5
OS 6OS 7
PARK
LSC 1
LSC 2LSC 3LSC 4LSC 5LSC 6LSC 7LSC 8LSC 9
LSC 10
LSC 11
IOD 1
IOD 2
TOTAL

LAND USE

20.0426.39

4.00 18.44

1.93 5.340.130.49

1.84 0.970.740.600.430.760.630.04

0.02 0.470.050.050.37

1.78 4.49

90.00 AREA (AC)
* PARCEL SIZES AS SHOWN MAY VARY TO REFLECT FINAL

SITE CONFIGURATION AT TIME OF IMPROVEMENT PLANS,

AND WILL BE REFLECTED ON THE LARGE LOT FINAL AND
SMALL LOT MAPS.
* City of Lincoln, California June 19, 2026 Windsor Cove Cover Sheet Large Lot Tentative Map N89°35'54"E 1151.30' 112 N00°23'03"E 10623.14'
107R

BASIS OF BEARINGS
(TIE)
SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT:

NOTE:

OWNER TO DEDICATE ALL REQUIRED IOD'S AND EASEMENT WITH THE

FINAL MAP OR DEDICATION BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT IF ROADWAY IOD'S AND EASEMENT NEEDED PRIOR TO FINAL MAP BEING RECORDED.

A GRADING PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY DEVELOPMENT ON ANY PARCELS.

Attachment 9 Exhibit C
524
Resolution No. 2026-

Page 1 of 4 ends

Lincoln City CouncilJuly 28, 2026

Lincoln City Council
July 28, 2026