Agenda packet — Lincoln City Council, July 28, 2026 (part 8 of 10)

identifies an ultimate systemwide PWWF of approximately 100.1 MGD at full buildout. This PWWF value represents a collection system planning condition and is distinct from regulated wastewater treatment throughput at the WWTRF.

The City has indicated that the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan is currently being updated by Stantec to reflect updated system conditions, development projections, and long range infrastructure planning. Until the updated master plan is adopted, the 2018 Master Plan remains the applicable planning document for project evaluation.

LiSWA’s treatment capacity planning does not assume immediate construction of ultimate facility capacity. Rather, LiSWA has evaluated future wastewater demands using multiple modeled expansion scenarios (six scenarios) that reflect varying growth rates, timing assumptions, and development patterns. This scenario based approach allows treatment capacity expansions to be phased over time as demand materializes.

Consistent with this framework, LiSWA is currently advancing Phase 1 treatment facility improvements and has documented a phased expansion strategy that enables additional treatment capacity to be implemented incrementally and funded through future connection fees, treatment charges, and financing mechanisms, rather than speculative upfront construction.

Incremental Wastwater Flow Generation Analysis
The proposed modification to the Village 7 Specific Plan would increase the total residential unit count from 3,285 units to 3,788 units, resulting in an incremental increase of 503 dwelling units. To evaluate whether this change would result in new or more severe wastewater impacts, the incremental wastewater flow generated by the additional residential units was quantified using the same planning assumptions applied in the City of Lincoln Wastewater Collection System Master Plan.

Table 3-7 of the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan identifies a residential wastewater generation rate of 250 gallons per day per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (gpd/EDU) for average dry weather flow planning purposes. For residential development with Land Use Designations of RR to HDR, one dwelling unit is assumed to be equivalent to one EDU. This unit flow factor represents a conservative planning assumption used to assess wastewater collection and treatment system loading and was applied in the prior evaluation of Village 7 buildout conditions.

Using this planning factor, the incremental average daily wastewater flow (ADWF) associated with the proposed increase in residential units is calculated as follows:
• Additional dwelling units: 503 units (503 EDUs)
• Average daily wastewater generation factor: 250 gpd per EDU • Incremental average daily flow:
503 EDUs × 250 gpd/EDU = 125,750 gallons per day, or approximately 0.13 million gallons per day (MGD)
For consistency with the prior adopted analysis, wastewater collection system impacts were evaluated under peak wet weather flow (PWWF) conditions using the same peaking factor of 2.3 that was applied to Villages 1 and 7 in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. This peaking factor accounts for diurnal flow variability and system response during peak conditions and was used in the Master Plan to evaluate trunk sewer conveyance capacity.

Based on application of this peaking factor, the incremental peak wastewater flow associated with the proposed unit increase is calculated as follows:
• Incremental average daily flow: 0.13 MGD
• Peaking factor: 2.3
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1394

MEMORANDUM
Wastewater Capacity
Liberty at Lincoln – Village 7 SP

Page 3 of 3 ends

• Incremental Peak flow:

0.13 MGD × 2.3 = approximately 0.30 MGD
Because the regional trunk sewer facilities downstream of Village 7, including the Moore Road 66 inch trunk sewer, were modeled under full buildout peak wet weather flow conditions and are shown to retain greater than 15 MGD of residual capacity under Scenario 6, the incremental peak flow associated with the proposed unit count increase would not affect trunk sewer conveyance capacity or system level of service.

Accordingly, even when evaluated using conservative average and peak flow planning assumptions consistent with the prior approved Master Plan, the proposed increase in residential units would result in a minor and incremental increase in wastewater flows and would not result in new or more severe impacts to the wastewater collection system beyond those previously analyzed.

Conclusion
Based on review of the City of Lincoln Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, applicable wastewater treatment capacity information, and application of the same flow generation and peaking assumptions used in the prior adopted analysis, the proposed modification to the Village 7 Specific Plan would not result in more severe wastewater impacts to the existing infrastructure.

Incremental wastewater flows associated with the proposed increase of 503 residential units were evaluated using the residential planning factor identified in Table 3-7 of the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan and the same peaking factor applied in the prior evaluation of Village 7. The resulting incremental average and peak wastewater flows represent a small increase relative to the collection and treatment system capacity that was previously evaluated under full buildout conditions.

As documented in Appendix D of the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan, downstream regional trunk sewer facilities serving Village 7, including the Moore Road 66 inch regional interceptor, were evaluated under full General Plan buildout peak wet weather flow conditions (Scenario 6). The residual capacity analysis presented in the adopted exhibit indicates that the Moore Road 66 inch trunk sewer retains greater than 15 million gallons per day (MGD) of available conveyance capacity under ultimate buildout conditions and is not identified as capacity constrained based on the City’s adopted Level of Service (LOS) criteria. Accordingly, the incremental flow increase associated with the proposed modification does not change the modeled LOS determination for the regional trunk sewer system.

In addition, wastewater treatment capacity at the City’s Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility is managed under a phased expansion framework implemented by the Lincoln Sewer Maintenance District No. 1 Wastewater Authority (LiSWA), which is intended to accommodate regional growth over time through incremental facility improvements.

Therefore, the proposed increase in residential units would remain within the wastewater collection and treatment capacity assumptions previously analyzed and would not require new or additional offsite wastewater infrastructure improvements beyond those already identified in adopted planning documents. As a result, the proposed modification would not result in more severe wastewater impacts beyond those previously analyzed.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1395

APPENDIX E
UPDATED VILLAGE 7 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING
PLAN
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1396
1 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402
June 2026
VILLAGE 7 SPECIFIC PLAN
Updated Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Introduction
This document provides the updated Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) for the Village 7 Specific Plan Project EIR, pursuant to Section 21080.6 of the California Public Resources Code, which requires public agencies to “adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the changes to the project which it has adopted or made a condition of project approval in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment.” A MMP is required for the Proposed Project because the EIR has identified significant adverse impacts, and mitigation measures have been identified to mitigate those impacts.

The purpose of a MMP is to:
• ensure that mitigation measures are implemented;
• provide feedback to agency staff and decision makers about the effectiveness of the mitigation measures;
• provide learning opportunities for improving mitigation measures on future projects; and • identify the need for enforcement action before irreversible environmental damage occurs.

The Proposed Project would be subject to all applicable mitigation measures identified in the EIR, including mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study (Appendix A in the Draft EIR), as well as mitigation measures identified in addendums to the EIR.

Table 1 presents the mitigation measures for the Lewis Property portion of the Proposed Project.

Mitigation measures for the Village 7 Programmatic Portion are listed in Table 2.

The numbering of the individual mitigation measures follows the numbering sequence as found in the EIR and addendums to the EIR. Adoption of the MMP shall occur prior to, or concurrently with, adoption of the Proposed Project for which the program has been developed.

Contents of the MMP
The Components of the updated MMP are addressed briefly below. The MMP as updated in the Lincoln Village 7B Project Addendum includes changes to the previous MMP as published in the Final EIR and as amended in 2024. New text as a result of the Village 7B Addendum is indicated in double underline and text to be deleted is reflected by a strike through.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1397
2 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
Impact and Mitigation Measures: The impacts are summarized from the Draft EIR, Initial Study (IS) checklist (Appendix A in the Draft EIR), Final EIR, the 2024 Lincoln Village 7 Addendum, and the Village 7B Project Addendum The mitigation measures are taken verbatim from the EIR, IS, previous addendums to the EIR, and the Village 7B Addendum.

Monitoring and Enforcement Action: For every mitigation measure, one or more actions are described. These are the heart of the MMP, as they delineate the means for implementing EIR measures and, in many cases, the criteria for determining whether a measure has been implemented.

Implementation: This column identifies the entity that will undertake the required action. The contractor is named for actions occurring during grading or construction. On-site inspections will be done by City staff.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1398
3 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.1 Land Use and
Agricultural Resources

4.1-1 The Proposed Project
could result in internal land
use incompatibilities.

4.1-1(A)
a) The applicant shall construct fencing and post signs that incorporate Section

12.20.80 of the Lincoln Municipal Code and Section 602.8 of the California Penal Code to inform the public of sensitive wetland/wildlife areas near the open space areas and in the Orchard Creek Wetlands Preserve that borders the Lewis Property on the south and at other wetland/wildlife areas within the open space areas at the Lewis Property.

Applicant O DSD
b) The applicant shall design its specific project to comply with all setback and buffer requirements required by any Clean Water Act Section 404 permits, incidental take permits and Streambed Alteration Agreements.

Applicant G DSD
Corps.

CDFG
c) Notify homebuyers of the presence of sensitive wetland/wildlife areas within the open space areas.

Applicant O DSD

4.1-2 The Proposed Project
could result in land use
incompatibilities with adjacent
land uses.

4.1-2(A)
b) The applicant shall provide to home buyers within the Proposed Project information about agricultural operations and potential nuisance activities occurring on lands adjacent to the project site, including a copy of Placer County’s Right-to-Farm Ordinance. Residential development located next to active agricultural areas shall have a notice included in the deed notifying buyers of the agricultural use.
c) Record disclosures concerning all residential properties within the C1 Zone and D Zone regarding noise and safety issues as required by the Placer County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and California Business and Professions Code section 11010 and California Civil Code sections 1102.6, 1103.4, and 1353.

Applicant
Applicant
O
I
DSD
DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1399
4 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.3 Transportation and
Circulation

4.3-5 The Proposed Project
would worsen to an
unacceptable level or further
worsen already unacceptable
operations at three locations
on SR 65 south of Lincoln
under existing plus project
conditions.

4.3-5
Prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the Proposed Project, the project applicants or their successors shall pay the applicable South Placer Regional Transportation Authority Fee, which will help fund the widening of SR 65 to six lanes.

Applicant B DSD

4.3-6 The Proposed Project
would add significant levels of
traffic to Moore Road
between the project site and
Fiddyment Road, and to
Fiddyment Road from Moore
Road to the south City limits,
which are not constructed to
current design standards.

4.3-6
The project applicants or their successors shall pay a fair share of the cost to upgrade Moore Road between Fiddyment Road and the western project boundary, and Fiddyment Road from Moore Road to the south City limits, to current City of Lincoln design standards for a two-lane arterial. The City may add this road improvement to the Public Facilities Element (PFE), with PFE credits being given to the constructing party. Alternatively, the City may require the project applicants or their successors to construct the improvements and provide them with a right of reimbursement from third parties who also benefit from the improvements. The timing of the fair share payment or construction shall be as specified in the development agreement(s) between City and project applicants, but the required timing will be concurrent with the development of the threshold triggering use.

Applicant B DSD

4.3-13 The Proposed Project
would worsen to an
unacceptable level or further
worsen cumulatively
unacceptable operations (to a
significant degree) on
roadway segments within
Placer County.

4.3-13
Prior to the issuance of Building Permits at the Proposed Project, the project applicants or their successors shall pay a fair-share of the cost to improve the five Placer County roadway segments significantly impacted by the Proposed Project, provided that either the Placer County Traffic Mitigation fee program is modified and/or a regional funding mechanism is in place to include improvements to these roadways.

Applicant B DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1400
5 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.3-14 The Proposed Project
would worsen cumulatively
unacceptable operations (to a
significant degree) on State
Route 193 and State Route
65 through Placer County,
Rocklin, and Roseville.

4.3-14
The project applicants or their successors shall pay SPRTA Fees to help widen SR 65 to six lanes, and pay a fair-share of the cost to make improvements to segments of SR 193 significantly impacted by the Proposed Project if a regional funding mechanism and roadway improvement plan for SR 193 are adopted prior to issuance of Building Permits at the Proposed Project.

Applicant B
DSD

4.4 Air Quality

4.4-1 Grading and other
earth-disturbing activities
associated with the Proposed
Project would generate
emissions of PM10 and PM2.5.

4.4-1(A)
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by the applicant during all grading activities:
• The applicant shall submit to the City of Lincoln, as the lead agency, and receive approval of a Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. This plan must address the minimum Administrative Requirements found in section 300 and 400 of District Rule 228, Fugitive Dust. The applicant shall have a pre-construction meeting for grading activities for 20 or more acres to discuss the construction emission/dust control plan with employees and/or contractors and the District is to be invited. The applicant shall suspend all grading operations when fugitive dusts exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations. An applicant representative, certified by CARB to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), shall routinely evaluate compliance to Rule 228, Fugitive Dust. This requirement for a VEE is for projects grading 20 or more acres regardless of how many acres are to be disturbed daily. It is to be noted that fugitive dust is not to exceed 40% opacity and not go beyond property boundary at any time.

If lime or other drying agents are utilized to dry out wet grading areas they shall be controlled as to not exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations. • Apply water to control dust as needed to prevent dust impacts offsite.

Operational water truck(s) shall be onsite, as required, to control fugitive dust.

Construction vehicles leaving the site shall be cleaned to prevent dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being released or tracked off-site.

Applicant
Applicant
G
C
PSD
PCAPCD
PSD
PCAPCD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1401
6 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
• Apply approved chemical soil stabilizers, vegetative mats, or other appropriate best management practices to manufacturers specifications, to all-inactive construction areas (previously graded areas which remain inactive for 96 hours).
• Spread soil binders on unpaved roads and employee/equipment parking areas and wet broom or wash streets if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares.
• Install wheel washers or wash all trucks and equipment leaving the site. • Vegetation materials removed from the site during construction shall not be burned in the open. Vegetative material should be delivered to a green waste recycling facility.
• Active grading sites shall be watered at least twice daily. • A traffic speed limit of 15 miles per hours shall be posted and enforced on all unpaved construction roads.
• All excavating and grading activities shall be suspended when wind speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 miles per hour and dust is transported onto adjacent developed properties.

Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
PSD
PCAPCD
PSD
PCAPCD
PSD
PCAPCD
PSD
PCAPCD
PSD
PCAPCD
PSD
PCAPCD
PSD
PCAPCD

4.4-2 Construction activities
associated with the Proposed
Project would generate
emissions of criteria air
pollutants ROG and NOx that
would exceed PCAPCD
thresholds.

4.4-2(A)
During all phases of construction, the project applicant shall ensure that the following mitigation measures are implemented:
• During second stage smog alerts (0.350 ppm of ozone), the construction day shall be shortened and the number of vehicles and equipment operating at the same time shall be reduced.
• Construction equipment operators shall shut off equipment when not in use to avoid unnecessary idling. Vehicle idling shall be kept below five consecutive minutes in accordance with Lincoln Municipal Code Section 10.14 requirements.
• Construction equipment exhaust emissions shall not exceed District Rule 202 Visible Emission limitations. Operators of vehicles and equipment found to exceed opacity limits are to be immediately notified and the equipment must Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
C
C
C
PSD
PCAPCD
PSD
PCAPCD
PSD
PCAPCD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1402
7 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
be repaired within 72 hours. An applicant representative, certified to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), shall routinely evaluate project related off-road and heavy-duty on-road equipment emissions for compliance with this requirement for projects grading more than 20 acres in size regardless in how many acres are to be disturbed daily. Contractors can access the PCAPCD or Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District's web site to determine if their off-road fleet meets the requirements listed in this measure.
• The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e. make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower of greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. The project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, and name and phone number of the project manager and on-site foreman. The project shall provide a plan for approval by the District demonstrating that the heavy-duty (> 50 horsepower) off-road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased and subcontractor vehicles, will achieve a project wide fleet average up to 20 percent NOx reduction and 45 percent particulate reduction compared to the most recent CARB fleet average. The District should be contacted for average fleet emission data. Acceptable options for reducing emissions may include use of late model engines, low-emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine retrofit technology, aftertreatment products, and/or other options as they become available.
• The following measure shall be incorporated into construction bid documents:

All applicable pieces (at a minimum three pieces) of diesel equipment used on the site during the demolition, earthmoving and clearing stages of construction shall be fitted with a level 3 California Air Resources Board verified diesel emission control system. All off-road and onroad construction equipment shall use a B20 biodiesel blend. Prior to the issuance of a demolition or grading permit, the construction contractor and/or applicant shall submit to the PCAPCD and the City a certified list of the non-road diesel powered construction equipment that will be retrofitted with emission control devices or that will use Clean Fuels. The Clean Fuels shall consist of low Applicant
Applicant
G
G
PSD
PCAPCD
DSD
PCAPCD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1403
8 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
NOx and PM10 emission diesel fuel that (1) can be used without engine modification, (2) is certified to provide a minimum emissions reduction of 30 percent PM10 and 10 percent NOx when compared to No. 2 Diesel Fuel, and (3) is included on the CARB Verification List. The list shall include (1) the equipment number, type, make, and contractor/sub-contractor name; (2) the emission control device make, model and EPA or CARB verification number; and/or (3) the type and source of fuel to be used. If any diesel powered nonroad construction equipment is found to be in non-compliance with this specification, the contractor will be issued a Notice of Non-Compliance and given a 24 hour period in which to bring the equipment into compliance or remove it from the project. For each piece of diesel powered non-road construction equipment that will not be retrofitted or use Clean Fuels, the project applicant shall provide an explanation detailing why such measures are not employed.

4.4-3 Operation of the
Proposed Project would
generate emissions of criteria
pollutants.

4.4-3(A)
The project applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures:
• The conditions of approval and the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) for the project shall explicitly prohibit the installation of woodburning stoves and wood-burning fireplaces within the Lewis Property portion of the Specific Plan area. Only natural gas or propane fireplace stoves and fireplaces are permitted in single-family residential units. No natural gas or propane fireplaces stoves or fireplaces shall be installed in multi-family residential units. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the applicant must provide written proof of compliance with this measure to the City and PCAPCD.
• Only Energy Star-labeled (or equivalent) refrigerators, clothes washers, and dishwashers shall be installed in multi-family dwelling units, and Energy Star labeled (or equivalent) dishwashers shall be installed in single-family dwelling units.
• The project applicant shall participate in the PCAPCD off-site mitigation program for post mitigated emissions that exceed PCAPCD thresholds. Off-site mitigation strategies include retrofitting Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
I
B
B
DSD
DSD
PCAPCD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1404
9 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
existing on-road heavy-duty vehicles/equipment with cleaner burning engines, retrofitting or purchasing new low emission agriculture pumps, transit vehicles, and CNG fueling infrastructure. To participate in the off-site mitigation program, the applicant shall pay into the PCAPCD off-site mitigation program, included in Appendix D in this Draft EIR, in consultation with PCAPCD.

4.4-5 Project occupants could
be exposed to intermittent
odors from the City of Lincoln
Wastewater Treatment and
Reclamation Facility
(WWTRF), Western Regional
Sanitary Landfill (WRSL)
Material Recovery Facility
(MRF), or nearby agricultural
operations.

4.4-5(A)
Record perpetual notices for all lots within the Village 7 Specific Plan indicating that odors from the Lincoln WWTRF, WRSL, and agricultural operations could occur, and provide copies of this notice to all buyers of these properties.

Applicant I DSD

4.4-7 Construction of the
Proposed Project would add
to cumulative emissions of
PM10 and PM2.5.

4.4-7(A)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-1.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-1.

4.4-8 Construction of the
Proposed Project would
generate emissions of ozone
precursors that could
combine with other precursor
emissions and temporarily
increase ozone levels in the
region.

4.4-8(A)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-2.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-2.

4.4-9 The Proposed Project’s
operational emissions of
criteria air pollutants would
add to cumulative emissions,
which would result in a net
increase of ozone precursor
emissions that could obstruct
implementation of the local
air quality plan.

4.4-9(A)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-3.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-3.

4.4-11 The Proposed Project,
in addition to other area odor
sources, would not expose
sensitive receptors to odors
that could be cumulatively
considerable.

4.4-11(A)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-5.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-5.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-3.

4.5 Noise

4.5-1 Construction of the
Proposed Project would
temporarily increase ambient
noise levels.

4.5-1(A)
The City shall ensure construction contractors comply with the following:
• Construction hours shall be limited to 7am to 5pm Monday through Friday and on Saturdays from 8am to 4pm, with no construction on Sundays and holidays (unless extended by a special permit).
• All heavy construction equipment and all stationary noise sources (such as diesel generators) shall have manufacturer-installed mufflers. • Equipment warm up areas, water tanks, and equipment storage areas shall be located in an area as far away from existing residences as is feasible. • Construction equipment operators shall shut off equipment when not in use to avoid unnecessary idling. Vehicle idling shall be kept below five consecutive minutes in accordance with Lincoln Municipal Code Section 10.14 requirements.

4.5-5 Construction of the
Proposed Project would
temporarily add to cumulative
noise levels in the vicinity of
the Proposed Project site.

4.5-5(A)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.5-1.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.5-1.

4.6 HazardousMaterials and
Public Safety

4.6-1 Construction of the
Proposed Project could result
in the generation or exposure
of hazardous materials that
could create a health or
safety hazard to workers, the
public, or the environment.

4.6-1(A)
a) Prior to demolition of existing on-site structures and/or development of the Lewis Property, the project applicant shall implement all recommendations from the Phase I EA completed by GeoTrans, Inc. Specifically, the project applicant shall:
• Contact and coordinate with the PCEHS and/or the local air management district to determine if asbestos sampling and abatement is required prior to demolition of the onsite structures. If such a survey is required, all soils surrounding the existing and former structures shall be sampled for residual fragments of lead-based paint, as well.
• Prior to the development of the property, the project applicant shall abandon all domestic and irrigation wells in accordance with state and local requirements.
• The project applicant shall remove and properly dispose of, or recycle, all petroleum chemicals and hazardous materials from the property. • The project applicant shall remove the concrete, tires, and wood debris from the on-site dumping areas. The soils beneath the debris shall be observed for stains or discoloration.
b) If evidence of contamination is found, construction activities shall cease and an environmental professional shall assess the situation. If necessary, the environmental professional shall prepare a sampling plan to collect soil and/or groundwater samples to determine whether or not the site has been adversely affected by past activities. The samples shall be analyzed for the contaminants determined to be a potential health concern by the environmental professional. Depending on the nature of the contamination (if any), the PCEHS shall be contacted for further direction, which could include further investigation or remediation.

Applicant
Applicant
G
C
DSD
PSD
PCEHS
PSD
PCEHS
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1407
12 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.6-2 Construction of the
Proposed Project could
create a health hazard to
workers, the public, and the
environment due to
previously unidentified
contaminated soil and
groundwater.

4.6-2(A)
If, during construction activities, evidence of hazardous materials contamination is observed or suspected (i.e., stained or odorous soil, or oily or discolored water), construction activities shall cease and an environmental professional shall assess the situation. If necessary, the environmental professional shall prepare a sampling plan to collect soil and/or groundwater samples to determine whether or not the site has been adversely affected by past activities. The samples shall be analyzed for the contaminants determined to be a potential health concern by the environmental professional. Depending on the nature of the contamination (if any), the PCEHS shall be contacted for further direction, which could include further investigation or remediation.

Applicant C PSD
PCEHS

4.7 Hydrology and Water
Quality

4.7-2 Development of the
Proposed Project would
increase the amount (volume)
of stormwater runoff
discharged to Ingram Slough
and Orchard Creek.

4.7-2(A)
Prior to final map approval, the Applicant shall identify 78.0 acre-feet of storage capacity in the watershed to accommodate increased stormwater runoff volumes associated with the Lewis Property. Storage capacity shall be obtained at the existing Stormwater Retention Facility (SWRF) and/or the approved Lakeview Farms Volumetric Mitigation Facility.

AND
The Applicant shall be required to cover its fair share of costs associated with construction, operation, and maintenance, and management of the regional retention facilities to offset increased stormwater volume generated by the Lewis Property. Assuming the regional facility has been constructed, Applicant shall pay the appropriate fees prior to final map approval.

If at the time the final map is approved, the regional facilities are not available or operational, or if additional capacity is required, the Applicant shall create on-site storage capacity, or through a combination of on-site and off-site Applicant I DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1408
13 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
capacity to fully mitigate the 78.0 acre-feet. If off-site facilities are used, The Applicant shall be required to cover its fair share of costs associated with construction, operation, and maintenance, and management of the regional retention facilities to offset increased stormwater volume generated by the Lewis Property. Assuming the regional facility has been constructed, Applicant shall pay the appropriate fees prior to final map approval.

4.7-4 Implementation of the
Proposed Project would
increase the types and
amounts of pollutants in
stormwater runoff that could
be discharged to Ingram
Slough, which could affect
water quality.

4.7-4(A)
a) Project Conditions of Approval shall specify that appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) be incorporated into project design to reduce urban pollutants in runoff, consistent with goals and standards established under federal and State non-point source discharge NPDES regulations and Basin Plan water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance No. 826B, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan. b) The proposed water quality facilities shall be identified and designed in a Stormwater Management Plan prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.40 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. All water quality facilities identified in the Stormwater Management Plan shall be constructed with the installation of the infrastructure.
c) The Stormwater Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities.

City
Applicant
Applicant/City
Applicant
City
G
G
G, C
City
PSD
DSD
PSD
DSD
PSD
DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1409
14 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
e) All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the California Stormwater Quality Association Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook for Construction and New Development/Redevelopment (or other similar source approved by the CVRWQCB, County, and City) for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based post-construction BMPs shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the PCFCWCD and City standards and shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs. All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the Proposed Project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs.
f) Stormwater runoff from the Proposed Project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment, oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. The applicant shall verify that proposed BMPs are appropriate to treat the pollutants of concern from the Proposed Project and shall provide for the establishment of vegetation, where specified, by means of proper irrigation, for effective performance of BMPs.

Prior to Final Map approval, easements shall be created and offered for dedication to the City for maintenance and access to these facilities in anticipation of possible City maintenance. No water quality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.

Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
G
G
I
PSD
DSD
PSD
DSD
PSD
DSD

4.7-6 The Proposed Project, in
combination with other
development within the
watershed, could contribute to
an increase in stormwater peak
flows and volumes.

4.7-6(A)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.7-2. See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-2.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-2.

4.7-8 The Proposed Project, in
combination with other
development within the
watershed, would contribute
urban pollutants to receiving
waters, which could adversely
affect water quality.

4.7-8(A)
Implement Mitigation Measures 4.7-4(a) through (f). See Mitigation Measure 4.7-4.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-4.

4.8 Biological Resources

4.8-3 The Proposed Project
could result in the loss and/or
degradation of rare plant
populations.

4.8-3(A)
a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused surveys within the project site for special-status plant species including but not limited to big-scale balsamroot, Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop, dwarf downingia, legenere, Sacramento orcutt grass, and Sanford’s arrowhead during the appropriate time of year (March through June). If no special-status plants are located during the surveys, no further mitigation would be required.

Applicant G DSD
CDFW
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1411
16 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
b) If Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop or Sacramento orcutt grass is located during the surveys in areas that cannot be avoided, the project applicant shall consult with CDFG to obtain a management permit, under Section 2081 of the California Fish and Game Code. Mitigation can be accomplished either in the onsite mitigation preserve area, or at an approved offsite mitigation bank.

The ratio of mitigation credits will be determined during this consultation, and can be conducted concurrently with Mitigation Measure 4.8-2(B) subsections (c), (d), and (e).
c) If any other special-status vernal pool plant species, including, but not limited to dwarf downingia and legenere are located during the surveys in areas that cannot be avoided, the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 4.8-2(B) subsections (c), (d), and (e), with the addition of soil/seed bank salvage, for use in created wetlands in mitigation areas. d) If any special-status upland plant species including, but not limited to bigscale balsamroot, or wetland species such as Sanford’s arrowhead are located during the surveys, the project applicant shall comply with adopted CDFG Guidelines.

4.8-4 The Proposed Project
could result in the loss and/or
degradation of western pond
turtles and its habitat.

4.8-4(A)
a) Prior to project construction, the project applicant and/or developer shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys of suitable habitat within the project site within 30 days prior to project construction to ensure no western pond turtles have established territories. If groundApplicant G C
DSD
CDFW
PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1412
17 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the preconstruction survey, the site shall be re-surveyed.
b) If individual western pond turtles are discovered during the survey on the project site, or immediately adjacent area, the project applicant or their agent shall initiate consultation with the CDFG to formulate and implement minimization measures, which could include capture and relocation of individuals found on-site.
c) If surveys identify the presence of western pond turtles on site, the project applicant shall implement mitigation measures required by the California Department of Fish and Game at the time of the consultation.

Applicant G
C
DSD
PSD

4.8-5 The Proposed Project
could result in the direct loss
or disturbance of nesting
migratory birds, including
raptors (birds-of-prey).

4.8-5(A)
a) If construction is to occur between March 15 through August 30, the project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG, shall conduct a preconstruction breeding season survey of the project site within 30 days of when construction is planned to begin. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (who is also knowledgeable about the California black rail) to determine if any protected raptors or migratory birds (including, but not limited to the California black rail) are nesting on or directly adjacent to the project site.

Applicant G
C
DSD
CDFW
PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1413
18 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
b) A description of methodology including dates of field visits, the names of survey personnel with resumes, and a list of references cited and persons contacted shall be provided to the City.
c) A map showing the location(s) of any protected raptor or migratory bird nests observed on the project site shall be provided to the City. d) The project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG, shall avoid all protected raptor and migratory bird nest sites located in the project site during the breeding season (approximately March 15 through August 30) while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction in close proximity to the nest during the nesting season. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer used. If the construction cannot be delayed, avoidance shall include the establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site. The size of the buffer zone will be determined in consultation with the City and CDFG. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing.

Applicant G
C
DSD
PSD

4.8-6 The Proposed Project
could result in the loss of
foraging habitat for
Swainson’s hawk, white tailed
kite, burrowing owl and other
raptors.

4.8-6(A)
The project applicant shall ensure that at least an appropriate number of acres (as approved by the City and CDFG) of annual grasslands or other suitable raptor foraging habitat are preserved based upon project impacts of 363 acres (0.75:1 ratio). Preservation may occur through either:

Applicant G DSD
CDFW
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1414
19 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
a) Payment of a mitigation fee to the City of Lincoln through a negotiated agreement between the City, the project applicant, and CDFG. The monies will be held in a trust fund, and used to preserve mitigation land through the purchase, monitoring, maintenance, and remediation of lands that support suitable raptor foraging habitat (consistent with CDFG guidelines); or b) Purchase of conservation easements or fee title to suitable raptor foraging habitat to protect the habitat from urban development; or c) Participate in Placer County Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan, once adopted.

Applicant G
C
DSD
PSD

4.8-7 The Proposed Project
could result in loss of nesting
habitat for tri-colored
blackbird.

4.8-7(A)
a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction nesting surveys for tri-colored blackbird colonies within the project site and off-site areas proposed for infrastructure development. The survey should be conducted no more than 30 days from the onset of construction. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the preconstruction survey, the site shall be resurveyed. b) The project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG, shall avoid all active nest sites located in the project site during the breeding season while the nest site is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction to avoid the nesting season Applicant G
C
DSD
CDFW
PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1415
20 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
or establishing a buffer around the nest site. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer used. If the construction cannot be delayed, avoidance shall include the establishment of a nondisturbance buffer zone around the nest site. The size of the buffer zone will be determined in consultation with the City and CDFG, and will be, at a minimum, 250 feet. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing.

4.8-8 The Proposed Project
would result in the
modification to stream
corridors, disrupting the
associated habitat.

4.8-8(A)
In addition to pre-construction surveys for special status species, as described in Mitigation Measures 4.8-3, 4.8-4, and 4.8-7, the project applicant shall obtain all necessary permits to alter Ingram Slough, including a CDFG Streambed Alteration Agreement, a Corps Section 404 permit, a Regional Water Quality Control Board Section 401 Permit and a SWPPP and any FESA/CESA take permits, should special-status species be identified.

Applicant
Applicant
G
G
C
DSD
CDFW
Corps
RWQCB
DSD
PSD

4.8-10 Construction of the
Proposed Project, in
combination with other
development in the County,
could contribute to the
cumulative loss of native
plant communities, wildlife
habitat values, special-status
species and their potential
habitat, and wetland
resources in the region.

4.8-10(A)
Implement Mitigation Measures 4.8-1 through 4.8-9.

See Mitigation
Measures 4.8-1
through 4.8-9.

4.9 Public Utilities

4.9-17 The Proposed Project
would increase the demand
on water supplies. Existing
and planned water supplies
would be sufficient to meet
the demands of the Proposed
Project in addition to the City
of Lincoln’s existing and
planned future uses, but the
existing entitlements are not
sufficient.

4.9-17(A)
Prior to recordation of a Final Map, the City of Lincoln shall obtain necessary entitlements demonstrating there will be adequate water supply to serve the portion of the Proposed Project defined on the Final Map, in accordance with Government Code Section 66473.7(a)(1) – SB 221 Written Verification of Water Supply.

City of Lincoln I DSD

4.9-19 The Proposed Project,
in combination with buildout
of project’s in the City of
Lincoln, would increase the
demand on PCWA water
supplies.

4.9-19(A)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.9-17 (obtain entitlements prior to Final Map recordation).

See Mitigation
Measure 4.9-17.

4.10 Visual Resources

4.10-2 Development of the
Proposed Project would
increase glare and lighting in
the project vicinity.

4.10-2(A)
All light standards shall be shielded and directed such that adjacent properties are not illuminated.

Applicant G, C DSD

4.11 Climate Change

4.11-1 Development of the
Proposed Project could
potentially result in a
cumulatively considerable
incremental contribution to
the significant cumulative
impact of global climate
change.

4.11-1(A)
a) An Energy Conservation Plan for all commercial and residential development shall be required prior to recordation of the first small lot Final Map. The plan shall describe the techniques and programs to be employed in the development of the project to achieve (1) a minimum 15 percent energy efficiency above that required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations, or compliance with the then-current Title 24 energy efficiency regulations. These programs shall include either:
(i) Participation in the PG&E Energy Star Performance Method. This method is available to builders of single-family and multi-family homes that are at least 15 percent more energy efficient than required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations and meet all US EPA specifications.

Participating builders become part of the California Energy Star New Homes Program, and their homes earn the Energy Star label. Incremental incentives can also be earned by adding energy efficient appliances and/or lighting to homes.

OR
(ii) Participation in the New Solar Homes Partnership (NSHP) Performance Method. This method is available to builders of single-family homes that Applicant I DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1418
23 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
are at least 15 percent more efficient than required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations and meet all US EPA specifications.

OR
(ii) Participation in the Build It Green Program, which was created by Build It Green, a nonprofit organization whose mission is to promote health, durable, energy and resource efficient buildings throughout California.

Using the Green Point Checklist, a home can be considered green if it fulfills the prerequisites and earns at least 50 points and meets the minimum points per category: Energy (30 points); Indoor Air Quality (5 points); Resources (6 points); and Water (9 points). Build It Green uses certified Green Point Raters to measure success with the program and verification of the measures employed to meet the requirements of the checklist.
b) The project applicant shall be responsible for having prepared, by an experienced and qualified firm, an Energy Resource Conservation Guide that will provide educational information on how homeowners can increase energy efficiency and conservation in their new homes. The information will be delivered to each original homeowner as part of the move-in package. The information packet shall be reviewed by, and be subject to approval of, City of Lincoln staff.
c) Installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) traffic signals and LED street lights shall be required at the Lewis Property and be constructed in accordance with City improvement standards or as otherwise approved by the Development Services Director.

Applicant
Applicant
O
C
DSD
DSD
d) The project applicant shall ensure that a tree planting program at the Lewis Property, approved by the City of Lincoln staff, provides the following:

Streets:

Residential collector streets: 1 tree per 35 linear ft
Applicant C DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1419
24 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
Primary residential street: 1 tree per 35 linear ft
Major and minor paseos: 1 tree per 25 ft.

Ferrari Ranch Road: 551 trees within the Lewis Property boundaries
Moore Road: 928 trees within the Lewis Property
boundaries
Central Blvd: 1,471 trees within the Lewis Property
boundaries
Residential Units:

LDR units: 1 front yard tree
Village Country Estate
(VCE) units: 2 front yard trees
MDR units: 1 front yard tree. Some MDR units may not
have front yards; however, where the front
of an MDR lot is on a paseo, trees will be
spaced 25 ft on center along the paseo.

The exact number of trees to be planted in
MDR developments will be determined
during the City’s design review process by
the City and project applicant with the goal
of having one front yard or back yard tree
for each residential unit.

HDR units: Average of 40 trees per acre
Open Space Areas:

Mini parks 27 trees per acre Community
parks 27 trees per acre Neighborhood
parks 27 trees per acre
School & VMU:

VMU: 10 trees per acre
School: 15 trees per acre
Commercial: Sufficient trees to provide 50% tree shading within 15 years in commercial and retail parking lots,
consistent with General Plan policy OSC-3.10.

3.9, “Shade Tree Planting,” the project applicant shall be responsible for having prepared, by an experienced and qualified firm, or by an organization such as the Sacramento Tree Foundation, a tree information planting and care guide. The planting and care guide will be delivered to each original homeowner as a part of the move in package. The planting and care guide shall be reviewed by, and be subject to the approval of, City of Lincoln staff. f) The City shall require that energy efficient lighting fixtures, including fluorescent lights, be installed as part of the original construction of residential and commercial structures within the plan area. g) The City shall require light-colored roofing materials with a solar reflective value and thermal emittance value of 0.25 or better on all residential and commercial buildings.
h) Pursuant to the City’s new 2050 General Plan, and specifically under the Energy Resources section, Goal OSC-3, “Encourage energy conservation in new and existing developments throughout the City,” the City shall be responsible pursuant to Policy OSC 3.14, “Early Planning for Energy Efficiency,” for developing a program whereby energy planners and energy efficiency specialists will be included in pre-application discussions with a developer or builder to help identify the potential for inclusion of solar orientation and other energy efficient systems into the land plan and building practices.

Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
O
B
B
Pre-application
DSD
DSD
DSD
DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1421
26 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
i) Implement all mitigation measures identified in Section 4.4, Air Quality. j) Implement Mitigation Measure 4.7-4 (Urban Stormwater Pollutants) in Section

4.7, Hydrology and Water Quality.
k) New commercial buildings (except schools) shall be 15 percent more energy efficient than the 2008 Title 24 building standards based on annual energy usage.
l) The roadway system shall be designed to accommodate the usage of neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs).
m) Provide bus turnouts and transit shelters on roadways that are to be served by bus transit in the future in accordance with City improvement standards and as otherwise directed by City’s Development Services Director. n) Water used during construction shall be reclaimed water.

See Section 4.4
See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-4
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
See Section 4.4
See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-4
B
G
G
C
See Section 4.4
See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-4
DSD
DSD
DSD
PSD
Initial StudyMitigation
Measures
Building height in air safety
zone
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure 1
The project developer shall request an airspace review for any building over 150 feet tall.

Applicant B DSD
Historical/archaeological
resources
Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 2
The project proponent shall provide proof to the City that no structures on-site are over 50 years old. If structures on-site are discovered to be 50 years old or older, or the age cannot be determined, a qualified professional shall be hired by the project proponent to evaluate the structures for historical significance and provide mitigation measures, if needed. Compliance with mitigation measures shall be demonstrated to the City prior to construction activities. All reports shall be filed with the appropriate CHRIS Information Center.

Applicant G DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1422
27 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 3
a) Prior to any ground-disturbing activities, the consulting tribe(s) shall evaluate the resource identified as UAIC THRIS 201608/CHRIS # P-31-2924 to determine if the resource is in an area that would be disturbed by project construction, which may include a site visit. If the consulting tribe(s) identify that the resource is significant and has the potential to be disturbed during project construction, the open space improvements shall be designed to avoid and preserve the resource. The City shall provide the tribe(s) the opportunity to survey for any additional tribal cultural resources, prior to any ground disturbing activities, and provide recommendations for avoidance and protection of the resources.

The City shall consult with the geographically and culturally affiliated tribe(s) regarding protection measures to be implemented. The protection measures shall be written in clear, enforceable language. The City shall provide the tribe(s) the opportunity to submit comments and participate in consultation regarding the protection measures. The project applicant shall not implement the protection measures until the tribe(s) approval of such, or, if an agreement cannot be reached after a good-faith and reasonable effort, the City determines that any or all feasible measures have been implemented, and the resource is avoided and protected. The project applicant shall hire a certified tribal monitor to observe all initial ground-disturbing activities (e.g., initial grading and trenching) in the area determined by the consulting Tribe to be culturally sensitive. Additional tribal monitoring of ground-disturbing activities may be required, based on the sensitivity of the area.

Applicant C PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1423
28 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 1
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT – LEWIS PROPERTY MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Lewis Property
Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
b) In the event any historic surface or subsurface archaeological features or deposits, including locally darkened soil (“midden”), that could conceal cultural deposits, animal bone, shell, obsidian, mortars, or human remains, are uncovered during construction, work within 100 feet of the find shall cease and the City of Lincoln (the City) shall be notified. The project applicant shall consult with a qualified archaeologist , the consulting tribe(s), and the City to determine if the resource is significant. If the find is determined to be of significance, (i.e., because the find is determined to constitute either an historical resource, unique archaeological resource, and/or a tribal cultural resource), then representatives of the City, the geographically and culturally affiliated tribal representative (for prehistoric and tribal cultural resources), the qualified archaeologist, and consulting tribe(s) shall meet to determine the appropriate course of action, with the City making the final decision. All significant cultural materials that cannot be avoided in place shall be collected by the Tribal Monitor and stored in a secure location on site, such as a lock box or conex. All materials shall be reburied in an area that is predetermined to not have future grounddisturbing activities. This area shall be recorded using GPS by the consulting tribe and the location kept confidential in the tribal database.

Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 4
Should any evidence of paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) be encountered during grading or excavation either onsite or offsite as a result of a project improvement, work shall be suspended within 100 feet of the find, and the City of Lincoln shall be immediately notified. At that time, the City shall coordinate any necessary investigation of the site with a qualified paleontologist as needed to assess the resource and provide proper management recommendations.

Possible management recommendations for important resources could include resource avoidance or data recovery excavations. The contractor shall implement any measures deemed necessary by the City for the protection of the paleontological resources.

4.1 Land Use and
Agricultural Resources

4.1-1 The Proposed Project
could result in internal land
use incompatibilities.

4.1-1(B)
a) The applicant shall construct fencing and post signs that incorporate Section

12.20.80 of the Lincoln Municipal Code and Section 602.8 of the California Penal Code to inform the public of sensitive wetland/wildlife areas within the open space areas.
b) The applicant shall design its specific project to comply with all setback and buffer requirements required by any Clean Water Act Section 404 permits, incidental take permits and Streambed Alteration Agreements. c) The applicant shall provide to home buyers within the Proposed Project information about agricultural operations and potential nuisance activities occurring on lands adjacent to the project site, including a copy of Placer County’s Right-to-Farm Ordinance. Residential development located next to active agricultural areas shall have a notice included in the deed notifying buyers of the agricultural use.

Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
O
G
O
DSD
DSD
Corps.

CDFG
DSD

4.1-2 The Proposed Project
could result in land use
incompatibilities with adjacent
land uses.

4.1-2(B)
a) Implement Mitigation Measures 4.1-1(B).
b) The applicant shall provide to home buyers within the Proposed Project information about agricultural operations and potential nuisance activities occurring on lands adjacent to the project site, including a copy of Placer County’s Right-to-Farm Ordinance. Residential development located next to active agricultural areas shall have a notice included in the deed notifying buyers of the agricultural use.
c) Record disclosures concerning all residential properties within the C1 Zone and D Zone regarding noise and safety issues as required by the Placer County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan and California Business and See Mitigation
Measure 4.1-1(B)
Applicant
Applicant
See Mitigation
Measure 4.1-1(B)
O
I
See Mitigation
Measure 4.1-1(B)
DSD
DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1426
31 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
Professions Code section 11010 and California Civil Code sections 1102.6, 1103.4, and 1353.

4.3 Transportation and
Circulation

4.3-5 The Proposed Project
would worsen to an
unacceptable level or further
worsen already unacceptable
operations at three locations
on SR 65 south of Lincoln
under existing plus project
conditions.

Applicant B DSD

Applicant B DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1427
32 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.3-13 The Proposed Project
would worsen to an
unacceptable level or further
worsen cumulatively
unacceptable operations (to a
significant degree) on
roadway segments within
Placer County.

Applicant B DSD

4.3-14 The Proposed Project
would worsen cumulatively
unacceptable operations (to a
significant degree) on State
Route 193 and State Route
65 through Placer County,
Rocklin, and Roseville.

Applicant B DSD

4.4 Air Quality

4.4-1 Grading and other
earth-disturbing activities
associated with the Proposed
Project would generate
emissions of PM10 and PM2.5.

4.4-1(B)
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented by the applicant during all grading activities:
• The applicant shall submit to the City of Lincoln, as the lead agency, and receive approval of a Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. This plan must address the minimum Administrative Requirements found in section 300 and 400 of District Rule 228, Fugitive Dust. The applicant shall have a pre-construction meeting for grading activities for 20 or more acres to discuss the construction emission/dust control plan with employees and/or contractors and the District is to be invited. The applicant shall suspend all grading operations when fugitive dusts exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations. An applicant representative, certified by CARB to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), shall routinely evaluate compliance to Rule 228, Fugitive Dust. This requirement for a VEE is for projects grading 20 or more acres regardless of Applicant C, G PSD
PCAPCD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1428
33 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
how many acres are to be disturbed daily. It is to be noted that fugitive dust is not to exceed 40% opacity and not go beyond property boundary at any time.

Operational water truck(s) shall be onsite, as required, to control fugitive dust.

Construction vehicles leaving the site shall be cleaned to prevent dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being released or tracked off-site.
• Apply approved chemical soil stabilizers, vegetative mats, or other appropriate best management practices to manufacturers specifications, to all-inactive construction areas (previously graded areas which remain inactive for 96 hours).
• Spread soil binders on unpaved roads and employee/equipment parking areas and wet broom or wash streets if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares.
• Install wheel washers or wash all trucks and equipment leaving the site. • Vegetation materials removed from the site during construction shall not be burned in the open. Vegetative material should be delivered to a green waste recycling facility.
• Active grading sites shall be watered at least twice daily. • A traffic speed limit of 15 miles per hours shall be posted and enforced on all unpaved construction roads.
• All excavating and grading activities shall be suspended when wind speeds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 25 miles per hour and dust is transported onto adjacent developed properties.

4.4-2 Construction activities
associated with the Proposed
Project would generate
emissions of criteria air
pollutants ROG and NOx that

4.4-2(B)
During all phases of construction, the project applicant shall ensure that the following mitigation measures are implemented:

Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1429
34 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
would exceed PCAPCD
thresholds.
• During second stage smog alerts (0.350 ppm of ozone), the construction day shall be shortened and the number of vehicles and equipment operating at the same time shall be reduced.
• Construction equipment operators shall shut off equipment when not in use to avoid unnecessary idling. Vehicle idling shall be kept below five consecutive minutes in accordance with Lincoln Municipal Code Section 10.14 requirements.
• Construction equipment exhaust emissions shall not exceed District Rule 202 Visible Emission limitations. Operators of vehicles and equipment found to exceed opacity limits are to be immediately notified and the equipment must be repaired within 72 hours. An applicant representative, certified to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), shall routinely evaluate project related off-road and heavy-duty on-road equipment emissions for compliance with this requirement for projects grading more than 20 acres in size regardless in how many acres are to be disturbed daily. Contractors can access the PCAPCD or Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District's web site to determine if their off-road fleet meets the requirements listed in this measure.
• The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e. make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower of greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. The project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, and name and phone number of the project manager and on-site foreman. The project shall provide a plan for approval by the District demonstrating that the heavy-duty (> 50 horsepower) off-road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased and subcontractor vehicles, will achieve a project wide fleet average up to 20 percent NOx reduction and 45 percent particulate reduction compared to the most recent CARB fleet average. The District should be contacted for average fleet emission data. Acceptable options for reducing emissions may include use of late model engines, low-emission diesel products, alternative fuels, engine Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
C
C
C
G
DSD
PCAPCD
DSD
PCAPCD
DSD
PCAPCD
DSD
PCAPCD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1430
35 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
retrofit technology, aftertreatment products, and/or other options as they become available.
• The following measure shall be incorporated into construction bid documents:

Applicant G DSD
PCAPCD

4.4-3 Operation of the
Proposed Project would
generate emissions of criteria
pollutants.

4.4-3(B)
The project applicant shall implement the following mitigation measures:
• The conditions of approval and the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) for the project shall explicitly prohibit the installation of woodburning stoves and wood-burning fireplaces within the Programmatic Portion of the Specific Plan area. Only natural gas- or propane-fireplace stoves are permitted. Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the applicant must Applicant I DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1431
36 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
provide written proof of compliance with this measure to the City and PCAPCD.
• Only Energy Star-labeled (or equivalent) dishwashers shall be installed in single-family dwelling units.
• The project applicant shall participate in the PCAPCD off-site mitigation program for postmitigated emissions that exceed PCAPCD thresholds. Offsite mitigation strategies include retrofitting existing on-road heavy-duty vehicles/equipment with cleaner burning engines, retrofitting or purchasing new low emission agriculture pumps, transit vehicles, and CNG fueling infrastructure. To participate in the off-site mitigation program, the applicant shall pay into the PCAPCD off-site mitigation program, included in Appendix D in this Draft EIR, in consultation with PCAPCD.

Applicant
Applicant
B
B
DSD
PCAPCD

4.4-5(B)
Record perpetual notices for all lots within the Village 7 Specific Plan indicating that odors from the Lincoln WWTRF, WRSL, and agricultural operations could occur, and provide copies of this notice to all buyers of these properties.

Applicant I DSD

4.4-7 Construction of the
Proposed Project would add to
cumulative emissions of PM10
and PM2.5.

4.4-7(B)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-1.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-1.

4.4-8 Construction of the
Proposed Project would
generate emissions of ozone
precursors that could combine
with other precursor emissions
and temporarily increase
ozone levels in the region.

4.4-8(B)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-2.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-2.

4.4-9(B)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-3.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-3.

4.4-11 The Proposed Project,
in addition to other area odor
sources, would not expose
sensitive receptors to odors
that could be cumulatively
considerable.

4.4-11(B)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.4-5.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-5.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.4-3.

4.5 Noise

4.5-1 Construction of the
Proposed Project would
temporarily increase ambient
noise levels.

4.5-1(B)
The City shall ensure construction contractors comply with the following:
• Construction hours shall be limited to 7am to 5pm, Monday through Friday and on Saturdays from 8am to 4pm, with no construction on Sundays and holidays (unless extended by a special permit).
• All heavy construction equipment and all stationary noise sources (such as diesel generators) shall have manufacturer-installed mufflers.

4.5-5 Construction of the
Proposed Project would
temporarily add to cumulative
noise levels in the vicinity of
the Proposed Project site.

4.5-5(B)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.5-1.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.5-1.

4.6 HazardousMaterials and
Public Safety

4.6-1 Construction of the
Proposed Project could result
in the generation or exposure
of hazardous materials that
could create a health or
safety hazard to workers, the
public, or the environment.

4.6-1(B)
a) Prior to demolition of existing on-site structures and/or development of the Village 7 Programmatic Portion, the project applicants shall contact and coordinate with the PCDEHS and/or the local air management district to determine if asbestos sampling and abatement is required prior to demolition of the on-site structures. If such a survey is required, all soils surrounding the existing and former structures shall be sampled for residual fragments of lead-based paint, as well.
b) For the Aitken Ranch II area, the applicant shall have a qualified professional review the results of the Phase 1 ESA and develop specific recommendations for removal of potentially contaminated items, soil and/or groundwater testing, as needed, and any subsequent remedial actions associated with the former turkey farming operations to ensure that development of the project site will not result in adverse human health or environmental risks during construction or occupancy. Soil and groundwater testing shall be performed prior to any site development activities that would disturb surface soils at the location of the former turkey farming operations. If chemicals are present in soils that would present a human health or environmental risk, a soil management plan shall be prepared by Applicant G, C DSD
PSD
PCEHS
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1434
39 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
the qualified professional prior to approval of Final Grading or Improvement Plans. The soil management plan shall specify how affected soils will be tested, removed, stockpiled, or otherwise handled prior to and during soil-disturbing activities.
c) The project applicant shall hire a certified hazardous material specialist to prepare a formal Phase I EA to analyze the potential for hazardous materials within the Remainder Area. The project applicant shall incorporate all applicable and feasible recommendations in order to reduce the risk of hazardous material release during construction to a less-than significant level.

4.6-2 Construction of the
Proposed Project could
create a health hazard to
workers, the public, and the
environment due to
previously unidentified
contaminated soil and
groundwater.

4.6-2(B)
If, during construction activities, evidence of hazardous materials contamination is observed or suspected (i.e., stained or odorous soil, or oily or discolored water), construction activities shall cease and an environmental professional shall assess the situation. If necessary, the environmental professional shall prepare a sampling plan to collect soil and/or groundwater samples to determine whether or not the site has been adversely affected by past activities. The samples shall be analyzed for the contaminants determined to be a potential health concern by the environmental professional. Depending on the nature of the contamination (if any), the PCEHS shall be contacted for further direction, which could include further investigation or remediation.

Applicant C PSD
PCEHS

4.7 Hydrology and Water
Quality

4.7-2 Development of the
Proposed Project would
increase the amount (volume)
of stormwater runoff

4.7-2(B)
a) The Applicant(s) shall develop an additional 23 acre-feet of storage capacity in the watershed to accommodate increased stormwater runoff volumes associated with the Village 7 programmatic portion of the Proposed Project Applicant I DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1435
40 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
discharged to Ingram Slough
and Orchard Creek.
(Aitken Ranch II, Scheiber, Remainder Area). The applicant(s) shall use one of the following options, or a combination thereof, presented in the Lincoln Nader/Aitken Ranch II/Sundance and the Remainder Properties Tentative Map, Master Drainage Study for volumetric mitigation:
• Participate in the City’s Proposed Phase 2 Regional Retention Basin:

Phase 1 of the City’s Regional Retention Basin project was constructed to accommodate up to 315 acre-feet from the Del Webb development.

Additional phased expansions (Phases 2 and 3) are planned to accommodate up to approximately 800 acre-feet of additional retention volume. The Village 7 Programmatic Portion could participate in the construction of Phase 2 of the existing City of Lincoln retention basin to mitigate the Proposed Project’s runoff volumes.
• Utilize excess capacity in the City’s Proposed Phase 1 Regional Retention Basin: Phase 1 of the City’s Regional Retention Basin project has a 315 acre-foot retention storage capacity and was constructed by Del Webb to mitigate their project impacts. Based on the SLMDP, the retention volume required to mitigate impacts for the Del Webb project totaled 286 acre-feet. The Phase 1 basin therefore has approximately 29 acre-feet of available storage that could be used by the Village 7 Programmatic Portion. This mitigation option would not entirely reduce the retention volume required for the Village 7 Programmatic Portion, but could be combined with one or more of the other options presented herein.
• Create a New Retention Basin: The project applicant could participate in the City’s future retention basin within the Cross Canal watershed.

OR
• Create a new on-site retention basin within the Village 7 Programmatic Portion.
b) If one or more of the off-site mitigation options listed in (a) are used, prior to final map approval, the project applicant(s) shall pay PFE fees to cover its fair share of costs associated with construction, operation, and maintenance, and Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1436
41 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
management of off-site regional retention facilities to offset increased stormwater volume generated by the Village 7 Programmatic Portion.

4.7-4 Implementation of the
Proposed Project would
increase the types and
amounts of pollutants in
stormwater runoff that could
be discharged to Ingram
Slough, which could affect
water quality.

4.7-4(B)
a) Project Conditions of Approval shall specify that appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) be incorporated into project design to reduce urban pollutants in runoff, consistent with goals and standards established under federal and State non-point source discharge NPDES regulations and Basin Plan water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance No. 826B, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan. b) The proposed water quality facilities shall be identified and designed in a Stormwater Management Plan prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.40 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. All water quality facilities identified in the Stormwater Management Plan shall be constructed with the installation of the infrastructure.
c) The Stormwater Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities.

The City shall formally adopt and implement a funding mechanism specifically to fund the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities as proposed by the Stormwater Management Plan.
d) The project applicant shall submit a site-specific BMP plan showing the onsite locations and effectiveness of the BMP facilities proposed for long-term water quality impact reduction prior to project approval. The plan shall include a method or methods for financing the long-term maintenance of the proposed site-specific facilities.
e) All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the California Stormwater Quality Association Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook for Construction and New Development/Redevelopment (or other similar source approved by the CVRWQCB, County, and City) for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based post-construction BMPs shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the PCFCWCD and City standards and shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs.

City
Applicant
Applicant/City
Applicant
Applicant
City
G
G
G, C
G
City
PSD
DSD
PSD
DSD
PSD
DSD
PSD
DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1437
42 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the Proposed Project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs. f) Stormwater runoff from the Proposed Project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment, oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. The applicant shall verify that proposed BMPs are appropriate to treat the pollutants of concern from the Proposed Project and shall provide for the establishment of vegetation, where specified, by means of proper irrigation, for effective performance of BMPs.

Prior Final Map approval, easements shall be created and offered for dedication to the City for maintenance and access to these facilities in anticipation of possible City maintenance. No water quality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.

Applicant
Applicant
G, I
I
PSD
DSD
PSD
DSD

4.7-6 The Proposed Project, in
combination with other
development within the
watershed, could contribute to an
increase in stormwater peak flows
and volumes.

4.7-6(B)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.7-2.

See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-2
See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-2
See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-2

4.7-8 The Proposed Project, in
combination with other
development within the watershed,
would contribute urban pollutants
to receiving waters, which could
adversely affect water quality.

4.7-8(B)
Implement Mitigation Measures 4.7-4(a) through (f).

See Mitigation
Measures 4.7-4(a)
through (f)
See Mitigation
Measures 4.7-4(a)
through (f)
See Mitigation
Measures 4.7-4(a)
through (f)

4.8 Biological Resources

4.8-1 The Proposed Project would
result in the filling or adverse
modification of jurisdictional
wetland/ other “waters of the U.S.”

4.8-1(B)
a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a wetland delineation of the remaining properties in the Village 7 Programmatic portion of the project site. This delineation shall be Applicant G
DSD
Corps
USFWS
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1438
43 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
submitted to the Corps for verification prior to the issuance of any grading permits for the Village 7 Programmatic portion of the project site. b) The project applicant shall prepare a wetland mitigation plan that ensures no net loss of wetlands, consistent with Lincoln Public Facilities Element (PFE)Policy 9-13. The wetland mitigation plan shall be based on the wetland delineation verified by the Corps. This measure may be implemented through the 404 permit and/or Streambed Alteration Agreement processes. The plan shall include the following or equally effective components.

Compensation
c) The project proponent shall compensate for the loss of wetland habitat through a combination of preservation of vernal pools and seasonal wetlands in open space preserves, on-site restoration/enhancement along Ingram Slough, and the purchase of mitigation credits at an approved mitigation bank. The ratio of compensation will be determined in consultation with the Corps and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, as part of the 404-permit process.

Reduction/Avoidance
d) Prior to any construction activities on the site, a protective fence shall be erected at the boundaries of the wetland preserves in the areas of construction. This fence shall remain in place until all construction activity in the immediate area is completed. No activity shall be permitted within the wetlands preserve except for those expressly permitted by the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
e) A buffer shall be provided along all preserved wetlands. Only those uses allowed in the 404 Permit and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreements shall be permitted in the wetlands preserve and its buffer.
f) Water quality in the wetlands preserve shall be protected using erosion control techniques including (as appropriate), but not necessarily limited to, preservation of existing vegetation, mulches (e.g., hydraulic, straw, wood, etc.), geotextiles and mats, during construction in the watershed. Additionally, urban runoff shall be managed to protect water quality in the wetlands preserve using techniques such as velocity dissipation devices, sediment basins and pollution collection devices.

Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
G
G
C
G,C
G,C
DSD
DSD
PSD
PSD
PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1439
44 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
g) Landscape irrigation runoff shall only be permitted to directly enter the wetlands preserve according to the provisions of the 404 Permit and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreement.
h) Mowing and other maintenance activities shall be limited to those detailed in the 404 Permit and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreement.

Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
O
O
G
C
PSD
PSD
DSD
PSD

4.8-2 Development of the
Proposed Project could result
in the loss of special-status
vernal pool crustacean and
amphibian species and
degradation and/or loss of
their habitat.

4.8-2(B)
a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a vernal pool crustacean survey following current USFWS protocol within the Village 7 Programmatic portion of the project site. Alternatively, the project applicant could forgo the surveys and assume presence of vernal pool crustaceans in all appropriate habitat within the Village 7 Programmatic portion of the project site. The survey, or assumption of presence shall occur prior to the issuance of any grading permits for the Village 7 Programmatic portion of the project site.
b) Surveys have determined that at least one of the federally-listed vernal pool crustacean species occurs on some properties at the project site. Other federally-listed vernal pool crustaceans and/or western spadefoot may also occur in affected pools within the project site. As development of the project site could result in the loss of these species, the following or equally effective measures (as approved by the City and USFWS) shall be required. The selected measures may be part of the permitting process.

Applicant G
C
DSD
USFWS
PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1440
45 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
Compensation
c) The project proponents shall obtain biological opinions from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (and if necessary, the National Marine Fisheries Service) and are further required to comply with the conditions and mitigation requirements of those agencies. Mitigation may include, but is not limited to, both onsite and offsite preservation and creation of wetlands, purchase of credits at mitigation banks, payment of in lieu fees approved by the agencies, or other agency approved and required mitigation measures. d) Orange exclusionary fencing shall be placed and maintained around any avoided (preserved) vernal pool crustacean habitat during construction to prevent impacts from construction vehicles and equipment. This fencing shall be inspected by a qualified biologist throughout the construction period to ensure that it is in good functional condition. After construction, fencing around open space areas containing wetlands or other sensitive habitats shall be replaced by permanent fencing that will be maintained by the City, and/or the local home owners association.
e) Prior to beginning work in the project site, all on-site construction personnel shall receive instruction regarding the presence of listed species and the importance of avoiding impacts on these species and their habitat. f) The project proponent shall ensure that activities that are inconsistent with the maintenance of the suitability of remaining vernal pool habitat and associated watershed on-site is prohibited as required by the USFWS and Corps.

Mitigation Measure Biological Resources – 1 (2024)
If compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable loss of habitat types covered under the Placer County Conservation Program, the project applicant shall complete all required actions and pay all required fees necessary for mitigation of project impacts to covered habitat through the PCCP, at the replacement ratios required by the PCCP for each covered habitat type. The City of Lincoln shall identify project-specific conditions that Applicant G, C DSD
PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1441
46 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
will apply and calculate the required fees, mitigation/conservation bank credit payments, and/or in-lieu dedication requirements.

4.8-3 The Proposed Project
could result in the loss and/or
degradation of rare plant
populations.

4.8-3(B)
a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused surveys within the project site for special-status plant species including but not limited to big-scale balsamroot, Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop, dwarf downingia, legenere, Sacramento orcutt grass, and Sanford’s arrowhead during the appropriate time of year (March through June). If no special-status plants are located during the surveys, no further mitigation would be required. b) If Boggs Lake hedge-hyssop or Sacramento orcutt grass is located during the surveys in areas that cannot be avoided, the project applicant shall consult with CDFG to obtain management permit, under Section 2081 of the California Fish and Game Code. Mitigation can be accomplished either in the onsite mitigation preserve area, or at an approved offsite mitigation bank. The ratio of mitigation credits will be determined during this consultation, and can be conducted concurrently with Mitigation Measure 4.8-2(B) subsections (c), (d), and (e).
c) If any other special-status vernal pool plant species, including, but not limited to dwarf downingia and legenere are located during the surveys in areas that cannot be avoided, the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure

4.8-2(B) subsections (c), (d), and (e), with the addition of soil/seed bank salvage, for use in created wetlands in mitigation areas. d) If any special-status upland plant species including, but not limited to bigscale balsamroot, or wetland species such as Sanford’s arrowhead are located during the surveys, the project applicant shall comply with adopted CDFG Guidelines.

Applicant G DSD
Corps

4.8-4 The Proposed Project
could result in the loss and/or
degradation of western pond
turtles and its habitat.

4.8-4(B)
a) Prior to project construction, the project applicant and/or developer shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys of suitable habitat within the project site within 30 days prior to project construction to Applicant G, C DSD
CDFW
PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1442
47 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
ensure no western pond turtles have established territories. If grounddisturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the preconstruction survey, the site shall be re-surveyed.
b) If individual western pond turtles are discovered during the survey on the project site, or immediately adjacent area, the project applicant or their agent shall initiate consultation with the CDFG to formulate and implement minimization measures, which could include capture and relocation of individuals found on-site.
c) If surveys identify the presence of western pond turtles on site, the project applicant shall implement mitigation measures required by the California Department of Fish and Game at the time of the consultation.

Applicant G, C DSD
PSD

4.8-5 The Proposed Project
could result in the direct loss
or disturbance of nesting
migratory birds, including
raptors (birds-of prey).

4.8-5(B)
a) If construction is to occur between March 15 through August 30, the project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG, shall conduct a preconstruction breeding season survey of the project site within 30 days of when construction is planned to begin. The survey shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (who is also knowledgeable about the California black rail) to determine if any protected raptors or migratory birds (including, but not limited to the California black rail) are nesting on or directly adjacent to the project site.

Applicant G
C
DSD
CDFW
PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1443
48 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
b) A description of methodology including dates of field visits, the names of survey personnel with resumes, and a list of references cited and persons contacted shall be provided to the City.
c) A map showing the location(s) of any protected raptor or migratory bird nests observed on the project site shall be provided to the City. d) The project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG, shall avoid all protected raptor and migratory bird nest sites located in the project site during the breeding season (approximately March 15 through August 30) while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction in close proximity to the nest during the nesting season. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer used. If the construction cannot be delayed, avoidance shall include the establishment of a non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site. The size of the buffer zone will be determined in consultation with the City and CDFG. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing.

4.8-6 The Proposed Project
could result in the loss of
foraging habitat for
Swainson’s hawk, white tailed
kite, burrowing owl and other
raptors.

4.8-6(B)
The project applicant shall ensure that at least an appropriate number of acres (as approved by the City and CDFG) of annual grasslands or other suitable raptor foraging habitat are preserved based upon project impacts of 180 acres (0.75:1 ratio). Preservation may occur through either:
a) Payment of a mitigation fee to the City of Lincoln through a negotiated agreement between the City, the project applicant, and CDFG. The monies will be held in a trust fund, and used to preserve mitigation land through the purchase, monitoring, maintenance, and remediation of lands that support suitable raptor foraging habitat (consistent with CDFG guidelines); or b) Purchase of conservation easements or fee title to suitable raptor foraging habitat to protect the habitat from urban development; or c) Participate in Placer County Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan, once adopted.

Applicant G DSD
CDFW
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1444
49 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
Mitigation Measure Biological Resources – 1 (2024)
If compensatory mitigation is required for unavoidable loss of habitat types covered under the Placer County Conservation Program, the project applicant shall complete all required actions and pay all required fees necessary for mitigation of project impacts to covered habitat through the PCCP, at the replacement ratios required by the PCCP for each covered habitat type. The City of Lincoln shall identify project-specific conditions that will apply and calculate the required fees, mitigation/conservation bank credit payments, and/or in-lieu dedication requirements.

Applicant G
C
DSD
PSD

4.8-7 The Proposed Project
could result in loss of nesting
habitat for tricolored
blackbird.

4.8-7(B)
a) The project applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction nesting surveys for tri-colored blackbird colonies within the project site and off-site areas proposed for infrastructure development. The survey should be conducted no more than 30 days from the onset of construction. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the preconstruction survey, the site shall be resurveyed. b) The project applicant, in consultation with the City of Lincoln and CDFG, shall avoid all active nest sites located in the project site during the breeding season while the nest site is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction to avoid the nesting season or establishing a buffer around the nest site. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer used. If the construction cannot be delayed, avoidance shall include the establishment of a nondisturbance buffer zone around the nest site. The size of the buffer zone will be determined in consultation with the City and CDFG, and will be, at a minimum, 250 feet. The buffer zone shall be delineated by highly visible temporary construction fencing.

4.8-10(B)
Implement Mitigation Measures 4.8-1 through 4.8-9.

See Mitigation
Measures 4.8-1
through 4.8-9.

Have a substantial adverse
effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications,
on Crotch’s bumble bee.

Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 1
The provisions contained herein only apply if Crotch’s bumble bee remains a candidate species or is listed under CESA at the commencement of construction.

Following CDFW’s status report on Crotch’s bumble bee, if the California Fish and Game Commission finds that the petitioned action is not warranted, the provisions contained herein shall not be required.

Initial ground-disturbing activities associated with development of any future Tentative Map (e.g., grading, vegetation removal, staging) should take place between September 1 and March 31 (i.e., outside the colony active period) to avoid potential impacts on special-status bumble bees. If initial ground-disturbing activities do not occur between September 1 and March 31, then at a maximum of 14 days prior to the commencement of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for Crotch’s bumble bees in the area(s) proposed for impact.

Applicant If Crotch’s
bumble bee
remains a
candidate
species or is
listed under
CESA 14 days
prior to the
commencement
of construction
activities, if initial
ground-disturbing
activities are not
all completed
between
September 1 and
March 31.

City of Lincoln
Community
Development
Department,
CDFW, if Crotch’s
bumble bee
remains a
candidate species
or is listed under
CESA at the
commencement of
construction
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1446
51 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
The survey duration shall be commensurate with the physical extent of suitable floral resources (which represent foraging habitat) present within the area proposed for impact, and the level of effort shall be based on the metric of a minimum of one person-hour of searching per three acres of suitable floral resources/foraging habitat. A meandering pedestrian survey shall be conducted throughout the area proposed for impact in order to identify patches of suitable floral resources. Suitable floral resources for Crotch’s bumble bee include species in the following families: Apocynaceae, Asteraceae, Boraginaceae, Fabaceae, and Lamiaceae.

At a minimum, preconstruction survey methods shall include the following:
• Search areas with floral resources for foraging bumble bees. Observed foraging activity may indicate a nest is nearby, and therefore, the survey duration shall be increased when foraging bumble bees are present; • If Crotch’s bumble bees are observed, watch any Crotch’s bumble bees present and observe their flight patterns. Attempt to track their movements between foraging areas and the nest;
• Visually look for nest entrances. Observe burrows, any other underground cavities, logs, or other possible nesting habitat; • If floral resources or other vegetation preclude observance of the nest, small areas of vegetation may be removed via hand removal, line trimming, or mowing to a height of a minimum of four inches to assist with locating the nest;
• Look for concentrated Crotch’s bumble bee activity;
• Listen for the humming of a nest colony; and
• If bumble bees are observed, attempt to photograph the individual and identify it to species.

The biologist conducting the survey shall record when the survey was conducted, a general description of any suitable foraging habitat/floral resources present, a description of observed bumble bee activity, a list of bumble bee species observed, a description of any vegetation removed to facilitate the survey, and their determination of if survey observations suggest a Crotch’s bumble bee nest(s) may be present or if construction activities could result in take of Crotch’s bumble bees.

The report shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln Community Development Department prior to the commencement of construction activities.

If any sign(s) of a bumble bee nest is observed, and if the species present cannot be established as a common bumble bee, then construction shall not commence until either (1) the bumble bees present are positively identified as common (i.e., not a special-status species), or (2) the completion of coordination with CDFW to identify appropriate mitigation measures, which may include, but not be limited to, waiting until the colony active season ends, establishment of nest buffers, or obtaining an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) from CDFW.

If Crotch’s bumble bees are located, and, after coordination with CDFW, take of Crotch’s bumble bees cannot be avoided, the Project applicant shall obtain an ITP from CDFW, and the applicant shall implement all conditions identified in the ITP.

Consistent with Fish and Game Code Section 2081, mitigation required by any ITP obtained from CDFW shall minimize and fully mitigate any impacts of the authorized take, be roughly proportional in extent to the impact of the take, be capable of successful implementation, and, where various alternative measures are available, maintain the applicant's objectives to the greatest extent possible.

Specific required permit conditions may include, but are not limited to, the Project applicant’s qualified biologist translocating nesting substrate in accordance with the latest scientific research to another suitable location (i.e., a location that supports similar or better floral resources as the impact area), enhancing floral resources on areas of the site that will remain appropriate habitat, worker awareness training, and/or other measures specified by CDFW.

Biological Resources Mitigation Measure 2
Prior to the commencement of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a bat habitat assessment of all potential roosting habitat features, including trees and structures within the proposed impact footprint within the project vicinity.

The habitat assessment shall identify all potentially suitable roosting habitat and may be conducted up to one year prior to the start of construction. The results of the assessment shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln Community Development Department.
• If potential roosting habitat is identified (cavities in trees or potential roosts within structures) within the areas proposed for impact, the biologist shall survey the potential roosting habitat during the active season (generally April through October or from January through March on days with temperatures in excess of 50 degrees Fahrenheit) to determine the presence of roosting bats. The surveys are recommended to be conducted utilizing methods that are considered acceptable by bat experts after consultation with CDFW. Methods may include evening emergence surveys, acoustic surveys, inspecting potential roosting habitat with fiberoptic cameras, or a combination thereof.
• If roosting bats are identified within any of the trees planned for removal, or if presence is assumed, the trees shall be removed outside of pup season, only on days with temperatures in excess of 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Pup season is generally during the months of May through August. Two-step tree removal shall be utilized under the supervision of the qualified biologist. Two-step tree removal involves removal of all branches of the tree that do not provide roosting habitat on the first day, and then the next day cutting down the remaining portion of the tree.

Applicant Prior to the
commencement of
construction activities,
during the active
season, or if roosting
bats are identified
within any of the trees
planned for removal
City of Lincoln
Community
Development
Department
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1449
54 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
• Additionally, it is recommended that all other tree removal shall be conducted from January through March on days with temperatures in excess of 50 degrees Fahrenheit to avoid potential impacts to foliageroosting bat species. • If roosting bats are identified within any structures planned for removal, a bat exclusion plan shall be prepared by a qualified bat biologist describing the methods to be used to humanely exclude bats prior to disturbance. The plan shall be approved by the City of Lincoln Community Development Department after consultation with CDFW and shall be implemented prior to the start of construction.
• The requirements for the bat expert and City to consult with CDFW prior to approving survey methods and a bat exclusion plan shall be satisfied either where CDFW responds to requests for consultation within 30 days of the requests or where the bat expert and City have attempted to consult with CDFW but CDFW has failed to respond to the request within 30 days of the placement of the request.

4.9 Public Utilities

4.9-1 The Proposed Project
would generate additional
wastewater flows to be
treated by the WWTRF.

4.9-1(B)
Prior to approval of the first Final Small Lot Map for the first planning area developed in the Village 7 Programmatic Portion of the Village 7 Specific Plan, the City shall ensure the planned expansion of the WWTRF provides adequate capacity to accommodate flows from the Village 7 Programmatic Portion. The project applicants shall pay fair-share cost of required fees to fund the expansion of the WWTRF.

Applicant I DSD

4.9-2 The Proposed Project
would generate additional
wastewater flows, but not at
levels that that would exceed
the capacity of the existing
wastewater collection
infrastructure.

4.9-2(B)
The project applicants for the Village 7 Programmatic Portion shall submit a wastewater infrastructure plan to the City of Lincoln prior to approval of the first Final Small Lot Map for the first planning area developed in the Village 7 Programmatic Portion of the Village 7 Specific Plan. The applicants shall follow mitigation measures or recommendations identified within the plan to ensure wastewater flows would be adequately conveyed to the WWTRF.

Applicant I DSD

4.9-15 The Proposed Project
would generate a demand for
park and recreation facilities,
which could require the
construction of new or
expansion of existing
recreational facilities.

4.9-15(B)
The project applicant shall pay all applicable fair-share fees to the City pursuant to the established Public Facilities Element requiring 6 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents for the provision of recreational facilities to meet demands created by the Village 7 Programmatic Portion.

Applicant B DSD

4.9-17(B)
Prior to recordation of a Final Map, the City of Lincoln shall obtain necessary entitlements demonstrating there will be adequate water supply to serve the portion of the Proposed Project defined on the Final Map, in accordance with Government Code Section 66473.7(a)(1) – SB 221 Written Verification of Water Supply.

City I DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1451
56 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility

4.9-19 The Proposed Project,
in combination with buildout
of project’s in the City of
Lincoln, would increase the
demand on PCWA water
supplies.

4.9-19(B)
Implement Mitigation Measure 4.9-17 (obtain entitlements prior to Final Map recordation).

See Mitigation
Measure 4.9-17.

4.10 Visual Resources

4.10-2 Development of the
Proposed Project would
increase glare and lighting in
the project vicinity.

4.10-2(B)
All light standards shall be shielded and directed such that adjacent properties are not illuminated.

Applicant G, C DSD

4.11 Climate Change

4.11-1 Development of the
proposed project could
potentially result in a
cumulatively considerable
incremental contribution to
the significant cumulative
impact of global climate
change.

4.11-1(B)
a) An Energy Conservation Plan for all commercial and residential development shall be required prior to recordation of the first small lot Final Map. The plan shall describe the techniques and programs to be employed in the development of the project to achieve (1) a minimum 15 percent energy efficiency above that required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations, or (2) compliance with the then-current Title 24 energy efficiency regulations. These programs shall include either:
(i) Participation in the PG&E Energy Star Performance Method. This method is available to builders of single-family and multi-family homes that are at least 15 percent more energy efficient than required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations and meet all US EPA specifications.

OR
(ii) Participation in the New Solar Homes Partnership (NSHP) Performance Method. This method is available to builders of single-family homes that Applicant I DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1452
57 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
are at least 15 percent more efficient than required by the 2008 Title 24 energy efficiency regulations and meet all US EPA specifications.

OR
(iii) Participation in the Build It Green Program, which was created by Build It Green, a nonprofit organization whose mission is to promote health, durable, energy and resource efficient buildings throughout California.

Applicant
Applicant
O
C
DSD
DSD
d) The project applicant shall ensure that a tree planting program at the Lewis Property, approved by the City of Lincoln staff, provides the following:

Streets:

Residential collector streets: 1 tree per 35 linear ft
Primary residential street: 1 tree per 35 linear ft
Major and minor paseos: 1 tree per 25 ft.

Applicant C DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1453
58 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
Ferrari Ranch Road: 551 trees within the Lewis Property boundaries Moore Road: 928 trees within the Lewis Property boundaries Central Blvd: 1,471 trees within the Lewis Property
boundaries
Residential Units:

LDR units: 1 front yard tree
MDR units: 1 front yard tree. Some MDR units may not
have front yards; however, where the front of an
MDR lot is on a paseo, trees will be spaced 25 ft
on center along the paseo. The exact number of
trees to be planted in MDR developments will
be determined during the City’s design review
process by the City and project applicant with
the goal of having one front yard or back yard
tree for each residential unit.

Open Space Areas:

Mini parks 27 trees per acre
Community parks 27 trees per acre
Neighborhood parks 27 trees per acre
NOTE: The number of trees specified above is an approximate number and will be subject to adjustment for physical constraints resulting from the actual location of physical improvements (both above ground and underground) and public safety considerations, such as the need to preserve vehicle operator sight distances at all roadway intersections. e) Pursuant to the City’s new 2050 General Plan, and specifically under the Energy Resources section, Goal OSC-3, “Encourage energy conservation in new and existing developments throughout the City,” to address Policy OSC

Applicant O DSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1454
59 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
f) The City shall require that energy efficient lighting fixtures, including fluorescent lights, be installed as part of the original construction of residential structures within the plan area.
g) The City shall require light-colored roofing materials with a solar reflective value and thermal emittance value of 0.25 or better on all residential buildings.
h) Pursuant to the City’s new 2050 General Plan, and specifically under the Energy Resources section, Goal OSC-3, “Encourage energy conservation in new and existing developments throughout the City,” the City shall be responsible pursuant to Policy OSC 3.14, “Early Planning for Energy Efficiency,” for developing a program whereby energy planners and energy efficiency specialists will be included in pre-application discussions with a developer or builder to help identify the potential for inclusion of solar orientation and other energy efficient systems into the land plan and building practices.
i) Implement all mitigation measures identified in Section 4.4, Air Quality. j) Implement Mitigation Measure 4.7-4 (Urban Stormwater Pollutants) in Section

4.7, Hydrology and Water Quality.
k) The roadway system shall be designed to accommodate the usage of neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs).
l) Provide bus turnouts and transit shelters on roadways that are to be served by bus transit in the future in accordance with City improvement standards and as otherwise directed by City’s Development Services Director. m) Water used during construction shall be reclaimed water.

Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
See Section 4.4
See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-4
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
B
B
Pre-application
See Section 4.4
See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-4
G
G
C
DSD
DSD
DSD
See Section 4.4
See Mitigation
Measure 4.7-4
DSD
DSD
PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1455
60 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
Initial StudyMitigation
Measures
Building height in air safety
zone
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mitigation Measure 1
The project developer shall request an airspace review for any building over 150 feet tall.

Applicant G DSD
Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 3
a) In the event any historic surface or subsurface archaeological features or deposits, including locally darkened soil (“midden”), that could conceal cultural deposits, animal bone, shell, obsidian, mortars, or human remains, are uncovered during construction, work within 100 feet of the find shall cease and a qualified archaeologist shall be contacted to determine if the resource is significant. If the find is determined to be of significance, resources (such as grinding stones and mano fragments) shall be donated to an appropriate cultural center.
b) When Native American archaeological, ethnographic, or spiritual resources are involved, all identification and treatment shall be conducted by qualified archaeologists who are either certified by the Society of Professional Archaeologists (SOPA) or meet the federal standards as stated in the Code of Federal Regulations (36 C.F.R. 61), and Native American representatives Applicant C PSD
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1456
61 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
who are approved by the local Native American community as scholars of their cultural traditions.
c) In the event that no such Native American is available, persons who represent tribal governments and/or organizations in the locale in which resources could be affected shall be consulted. When historic archaeological sites or historic architectural features are involved, all identification and treatment is to be carried out by historical archaeologists or architectural historians. These individuals shall meet either SOPA or 36 C.F.R. 61 requirements.
d) If human bone or bone of unknown origin is found during construction, all work shall stop in the vicinity of the find and the County Coroner shall be contacted immediately. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission who shall notify the person it believes to be the most likely descendent. The most likely descendent shall work with the contractor to develop a program for reinterment of the human remains and any associated artifacts. No additional work is to take place within the immediate vicinity of the find until the identified appropriate actions have been carried out.

The project proponent or their construction contractor shall comply with the following measure to assist with identification of TCRs at the earliest possible time during project-related earthmoving activities associated with the Village 7B project site:
• Native American Tribes are experts in their Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) who have the statutory authority and expertise to identify sites or objects of cultural value to their Tribe and to recommend appropriate treatment and final disposition of such sites or objects. • The project proponent shall contact the UAIC at least two weeks prior to project ground-disturbing activities to retain the services of a Tribal Monitor(s). The duration of the construction schedule and Tribal Monitoring shall be determined at this time.
• A contracted Tribal Monitor(s) shall monitor the vegetation grubbing, stripping, grading, trenching, and other ground-disturbing activities on Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 021-350-046 within the Village 7B project site. All ground-disturbing activities in this area shall be subject to Tribal Monitoring unless otherwise determined unnecessary by the UAIC. Spot checking shall be permitted on the following APNs: 021-263- 006, 021-263-014, 021-263-022, 021-263-023, 021-350-006, 021-350- 023, 021-350-027, 021-350-038, 021-350-039, and 021-350-040. • Tribal Monitors or Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to direct that work be temporarily paused, diverted, or slowed within 100 feet of the immediate impact area if sites or objects of potential significance are identified. The temporary pause/diversion shall be of an adequate duration for the Tribal Representative to examine the resource.

Applicant G City of Lincoln
Community
Development
Department
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1458
63 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G
=
P
r
i
o
r
t
o
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
/
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
i
t
C
=
D
u
r
i
n
g
Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1459
64 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Village 7 Specific Plan
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
• Appropriate treatment of TCRs may include but is not limited to:

A. Recordation of the resource(s)
B. Avoidance and preservation of the resource(s)
C. Reburial of the resource(s) onsite in a designated area subject to no future disturbance. The location of the reburial shall be acceptable to the UAIC.
• To track the implementation of this measure, the Tribal Monitor(s) shall document field-monitoring activities on a Tribal Monitor log. • The Tribal Monitor(s) shall wear the appropriate safety equipment while on the construction site.
• The Tribal Monitor(s), in consultation with the UAIC THPO and the City, shall determine an end or reduction to the on-site monitoring if/when construction activities have a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources.

Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 2
The following mitigation measure is intended to address the identification and treatment of unanticipated discoveries of potential tribal cultural resources (TCRs) or resources of cultural significance to UAIC during ground disturbing activities.
• If any suspected TCRs or resources of cultural significance to UAIC, including but not limited to features, anthropogenic/cultural soils, cultural belongings or objects (artifacts), shell, bone, shaped stones or bone, or ash/charcoal deposits are discovered by any person during construction activities including ground disturbing activities, all work shall pause immediately within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. Work shall cease in and within the immediate vicinity of the find regardless of whether the construction is being actively monitored by a Tribal Monitor, cultural resources specialist, or professional archaeologist.

Applicant Immediately,
following the
discovery of any
suspected TCRs or
resources of cultural
significance to UAIC
during construction
activities.

City of Lincoln
Community
Development
Department
Placer County
Coroner
Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department
PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department
PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District
CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife
PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services
Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
I = Prior to Final Map Approval
G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit
C = During Construction/Grading
O = Prior to Occupancy
B = Prior to Building Permit
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1460
65 Preliminary − Subject to Revision
Village 7 Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program
ESA / 201800402.02
June 2026
Mitigation Monitoring Program
TABLE 2
VILLAGE 7SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT –VILLAGE 7PROGRAMMATIC PORTION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Impact Mitigation Measures – Village 7 Programmatic Portion Responsible
Entity
Timing /
Milestones
Monitoring and
Enforcement
Responsibility
• A Tribal Representative and the City of Lincoln shall be immediately notified, and the Tribal Representative in coordination with the City of Lincoln shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC §21074) and the Tribal Representative shall make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary.
• Treatment and Documentation:

A. The culturally affiliated Tribe shall consult with the City of Lincoln to (1) identify the boundaries of the new TCR and (2) if feasible, identify appropriate preservation in place and avoidance measures, including redesign or adjustments to the existing construction process, and long-term management, or 3) if avoidance is infeasible, a reburial location in proximity of the find where no future disturbance is anticipated. Permanent curation of TCRs will not take place unless approved in writing by the culturally affiliated Tribe.

B. The construction contractor(s) shall provide secure, on-site storage for culturally sensitive soils or objects that are components of TCRs that are found or recovered during
construction. Only Tribal Representatives shall have access to the storage. Storage size shall be determined by the nature of the TCR and can range from a small lock box to a conex box
(shipping container). A secure (locked), fenced area can also provide adequate on-site storage if larger amounts of material must be stored.

C. The construction contractor(s) and City of Lincoln shall facilitate the respectful reburial of the culturally sensitive soils or objects.

This includes providing a reburial location that is consistent with the Tribe’s preferences, excavation of the reburial location, and assisting with the reburial, upon request.

D. Any discoveries shall be documented on a Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 form within 2 weeks of the discovery and submitted to the appropriate CHRIS center in a timely manner.

F. If articulated or disarticulated human remains, or human remains in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness are discovered during construction activities, the Placer County Coroner and the culturally affiliated Tribe shall be contacted immediately. Upon determination by the County Coroner that the find is Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission will assign the Most Likely Descendent who will work with the project proponent to define appropriate treatment and disposition of the burials.

Monitoring Responsibility Timing of Action
DSD = City of Lincoln Development Services Department I = Prior to Final Map Approval PSD = City of Lincoln Public Services Department G = Prior to Improvement Plan/Grading Permit PCAPCD = Placer County Air Pollution Control District C = During Construction/Grading CDFW = California Department of Fish and Wildlife O = Prior to Occupancy PCEHS = Placer County Environmental Health Services B = Prior to Building Permit Corps = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1462

APPENDIX F
UPDATED VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING
PLAN
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1463
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-1 ESA / 130368 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 CHAPTER 4
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Introduction
Section 15097 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines requires public agencies to establish monitoring or reporting programs for projects approved by a public agency whenever approval involves the adoption of either a mitigated negative declaration or specified environmental findings related to environmental impact reports.

The following is the updated Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) for the Village 5 Specific Plan.

The intent of the MMP is to prescribe and enforce a means for properly and successfully implementing the mitigation measures identified within the Draft Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report (DPREIR) and the Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan EIR (2017 EIR) and updated in the Draft Partially Recirculated EIR (DPREIR) for this project.

Mitigation Measures
The mitigation measures are taken from the 2017 EIR and DPREIR and are assigned the same number as in the 2017 EIR and updated in the DPREIR. The MMP describes the actions that must take place to implement each mitigation measure, the timing of those actions, and the entities responsible for implementing and monitoring the actions.

MMP Components
The components of the attached table, which contains applicable mitigation measures, are addressed briefly, below.

Impact
This column summarizes the impact stated in the 2017 EIR, or as updated and stated DPREIR.

Mitigation Measure
All mitigation measures that were identified in the 2017 EIR are presented, as revised in the DPREIR and updated in the Final EIR, and numbered accordingly.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1464

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-2 ESA / 130368 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 Action(s)
For every mitigation measure, one or more actions are described. The actions delineate the means by which the mitigation measures will be implemented, and, in some instances, the criteria for determining whether a measure has been successfully implemented. Where mitigation measures are particularly detailed, the action may refer back to the measure.

Component
This column identifies the relevant component of the proposed projects to which the mitigation measure applies. The mitigation measure may apply to the Full Specific Plan, Area A, or Windsor Cove. More than one project component may be identified.

Implementing Party
This item identifies the entity that will undertake the required action.

Timing
Implementation of the action must occur prior to or during some part of project approval, project design or construction or on an ongoing basis. The timing for each measure is identified.

Monitoring Party
The City of Lincoln is primarily responsible for ensuring that mitigation measures are successfully implemented. Within the City, a number of departments and divisions would have responsibility for monitoring some aspect of the overall project. Other agencies, such as the Placer County Air Quality Management District, may also be responsible for monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures. As a result, more than one monitoring party may be identified.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1465

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-3 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.1 Aesthetics and Visual Quality

3.1-4: Implementation of the
proposed project would introduce
light and glare into the project area.

3.1-4:

During the design review process, the applicant shall adhere to the following measures to reduce impacts from light and glare:
a) All light standards shall be shielded and directed downward so that light shall not emit higher than a horizontal level.
b) Reflective surfaces of multi-story buildings facing streets, open spaces, parks, and residential neighborhoods shall be oriented to avoid generating glare that could create a nuisance or safety hazard.
c) For parks or other facilities anticipated to include nighttime activities, the site and placement of overhead lighting shall be designed to minimize exposure of adjacent properties to spillover light and minimize the amount of light that would be visible above the horizontal plane of the light fixture.
d) Normal operating hours for lighting related to nighttime recreational activities shall be until 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and on Friday and Saturday until 11:00 p.m. to reduce the disruption to adjacent properties. Special events that would require lighting beyond normal operating hours would be subject to a permit to be issued by the City.
e) All light standards shall be the minimum height possible to achieve necessary lighting goals, subject to approval by the Public Services Director.

Shield and direct light downward.

Orient buildings to minimize glare.

Minimize light spillover for all parks and
recreational facilities.

Limit lighting for nighttime recreational
activities to 10pm Sunday through Thursday
and 11pm on Friday and Saturday, requiring
specially timed events to obtain a City
permit.

Require light standards that achieve lighting
goals and meet Public Services Director
approval.

Full Specific Plan/Area A Project applicant During design review process
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department, City
of Lincoln Public Services
Department

3.1-8: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
a cumulative increase in light and
glare in the vicinity of the Plan Area.

3.1-8:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4. See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.

3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Services

3.2-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would result in
conversion of Important Farmland to
non-agricultural use.

3.2-1(a):
a) The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP to mitigate impacts of converting Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Unique Farmland agricultural lands., most specifically rice lands. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2(b), shown below.

Comply with PCCP vis-à-vis agricultural
lands.

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-1.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During the permitting process
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.4-1
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to delineate all wetlands and waters of the U.S. or other protected waters within the proposed development. The delineation(s) shall be submitted to the USACE for verification as part of the formal Section 404 wetland delineation process. If no wetlands are determined to be present, or if wetlands would be avoided, no further mitigation would be required. Prior to fill of any wetlands, or hydrologic interruption of the wetland, the applicant must obtain a Section 404 permit and obtain Section 401 certification from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
2) For each 1.0 wetted acre of vernal pools impacted, 1.35 acres of vernal pools shall be preserved. For purposes of calculating impact and mitigation requirements, seasonal depressional wetlands shall be considered vernal pools.

For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the preservation requirement may be met by preserving 1.35 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The preservation requirement for open water may be met through preservation of 1.0 acres of open water or any wetland type for each1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required wetland preservation under this strategy will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland preservation required by any permitting agency.

Implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and

3.4-2(b).

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During the permitting process
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
For each 1.0 acres of vernal pool impact, 1.25 acres of compensatory wetlands shall be restored, enhanced or created including a minimum of 0.75 acres of vernal pool and no more than 0.5 acres of other wetlands. For each 1.0 acres of Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1466

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-4 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party impact of any other wetland type, the restoration, enhancement, or creation requirement may be met by restoring, enhancing, and/or creating 1.25 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The compensatory requirement for open-water may be met through restoration, enhancement, and/or creation of 1.25 acres of open water or any wetland type for each 1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required compensatory wetland restoration, enhancement, or creation under this measure will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland restoration, enhancement, and creation required by any permitting agency as well as any wetland preservation required by a permitting agency greater than the wetland preservation amount required by this mitigation.

The compensatory requirement shall not be reduced below 1.0 by excess preservation.

Approximately 715 acres of land within the PCCP Reserve Acquisition Area that would serve as suitable mitigation land for impacts on habitat within Area A have been identified and acquired by the applicant. All mitigation lands would be located within the Upper Coon-Upper Auburn watershed north of Auburn Ravine.

Soil types at these mitigation lands would consist primarily of San JoaquinCometa sandy loams soils, with some occasionally flooded Xerofluvents soils, frequently flooded Xerofluvents soils, Cometa sandy loam soils, and CometaFiddyment complex soils. Some of these soils have impervious soil layers and support vernal pool complexes or could be restored to vernal pool or seasonal swale habitats. If the entire mitigation area is not needed for mitigation of Area A impacts, impacts to vernal pool habitats and species within other areas could be mitigated on these lands.

The mitigation lands are currently used as mostly grassland/pasture and fallow/ idle cropland, with some areas used to grow winter wheat, hay/non-alfalfa, and other crops. The mitigation lands are largely surrounded by fallow/idle cropland, rice fields, hay/non-alfalfa fields, and active cropland used for growing clover/wildflowers, rye, corn, and other rotational crops. Management of the mitigation lands could be modified to provide greater benefit to special-status plant and wildlife species.
3) Wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation shall be accompanied by the associated uplands and hydrology necessary to sustain long-term viability in a natural or restored environmental setting. 4) It is anticipated that most wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation may be accomplished on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement and will be subject to the required conservation easements and management plans. If additional lands are conserved to meet the wetland mitigation requirement, the same requirements for conservation easements and management plans shall apply.
5) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this strategy. 6) The density of wetlands on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement in some projects within the V5SP may provide wetland mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment shall be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other projects in the Plan Area to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City.
7) The City may allow mitigation located outside of Placer County that advances the City’s conservation goals and meets the biological intent of this mitigation strategy. In addition, the City may accept credits from out-of-county conservation or mitigation banks towards full or partial compliance with this strategy if the project is within the agency-approved service area for the credits.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1467

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-5 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Avoidance and Minimization Measures
8) Prior to any construction activities that could impact protected waters, a protective fence shall be erected around the boundaries of avoided wetlands, including a protective buffer as dictated in the 401, 404, or 1600 permits as described in section 9) below. This fence shall remain in place until all construction activity in the immediate area is completed. No activity shall be permitted within the protected areas except for those expressly permitted by the USACE and/or CDFW.
9) A construction buffer shall be provided along all avoided wetlands in accordance with the Section 404 permit, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Only those uses allowed in the Section 404 permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreements shall be permitted in the wetlands preserve and its buffer.
10) Water quality in the avoided wetlands shall be protected during construction in the watershed by using erosion control techniques including (as appropriate), but not necessarily limited to, preservation of existing vegetation, mulches (e.g., hydraulic, straw, wood), and geotextiles and mats. Additionally, urban runoff shall be managed to protect water quality in the wetlands preserve using techniques such as velocity dissipation devices, sediment basins and pollution collection devices.

3.4-2
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant shall obtain a Biological Opinion and any applicable incidental take authorization from USFWS and comply with the conditions and requirements therein.
2) The project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City, a Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that implements the open space, agricultural land and biological resources strategy and includes the following elements:
i. Identification and quantification of land cover and wetland removal and applicable mitigation requirements set forth below in subsection (5). ii. Identification and quantification of proposed mitigation lands and/or resources with sufficient detail to allow for City evaluation, including plans for restoration, enhancement and/or creation of wetlands.
iii. Identification of any conservation or mitigation bank credits or assignment of excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP.
iv. Draft conservation easements and draft management and monitoring plans, if applicable.
v. An endowment for long-term management of the proposed mitigation lands. 3) Any Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan must be approved by the City, in its sole discretion, at the time of the approval of any improvement plans for subdivision improvements or off-site infrastructure, recordation of a final map (not including a large lot final map that results in no disturbance of any existing natural condition), or issuance of any project-level discretionary approval for non-residential land uses that does not require a tentative subdivision map. A Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan may cover a development project or group of projects and must include any required off-site infrastructure unless covered by a separate project-level mitigation plan for that infrastructure improvement. The City may require the applicant to provide a conceptual plan for the Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that includes a calculation of acres of impact and acres of required mitigation prior to approval of a General Development Program or tentative map. A tentative map may have more than one Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan if the development authorized by the map is owned by separate owners.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1468

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-6 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party 4) Each project (including off-site infrastructure) must demonstrate compliance with an approved Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan prior to approval of a grading permit that results in land cover or wetland impact. Such compliance may be phased with the actual development of the project. Demonstration of compliance shall include:
i. Demonstrate recordation of required easements for land conservation. ii. Demonstrate ownership of applicable credits and/or assignment of any applicable excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP. iii. Demonstrate implementation of an endowment for the management of all mitigation lands.
iv. Demonstrate approval of construction and monitoring plans for any required restoration, enhancement, or creation of wetlands. Provide proof of executed contracts and initiation of construction.
v. Documentation and approval of any mitigation credits eligible for future use or assignment.
5) An Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan shall require that for every 1.0 acres of land cover impacted, 1.35 acres of land will be conserved in perpetuity. The impact area shall be calculated to the nearest onetenth (0.10) acre. The total amount of required acreage will be automatically reduced by any and all off-site conservation or mitigation land required by any permitting agency, specifically including upland areas required in association with wetland mitigation, whether acquired through mitigation bank credits or other means. The mitigation land to be conserved may be located in the Reserve Acquisition Areas, or elsewhere as determined by the City and regulatory agencies. No additional land mitigation will be required beyond the 1.35 to 1.0 requirement for the removal of land cover.
6) To determine the acreage of land cover impact, all land within the V5SP shall be considered to be “land cover,” except for land that is already developed with infrastructure, such as roadways, and homes and related development such as accessory structures, driveways, improved roadways, and landscaped areas.

Any land cover that will be maintained in or restored to a natural or semi-natural condition as required by the City and/or any state or federal permitting agency shall not be included in the land cover impacted acreage. Any wetland area required to be avoided, restored, and/or enhanced on site by the City and/or any permitting agency shall be automatically excluded from the removal calculation. 7) Land conserved under this measure shall, to the extent feasible, as determined by the City, be located within the Reserve Acquisition Area, but may be included in other areas deemed adequate by the regulatory agencies. Impacts to annual grassland, vernal pool grassland, and pasture lands cover shall be mitigated on existing or restorable grassland. All other land cover impacts may be mitigated on any natural or semi-natural land within the Reserve Acquisition Areas, specifically including agricultural land. Vernal pool grassland will be mitigated by any grassland without regard to wetted area density.
8) Conservation sites shall be subject to recorded conservation easements and management plans with an identified funding source for long-term management of conserved lands. The conservation easements and management plans are subject to approval by the City and shall provide for the long-term maintenance of biological functions and values while, whenever feasible, also providing for compatible agricultural use. The City shall accept as satisfactory mitigation any conservation easement and/or management plan required and approved by the terms and conditions of any permit issued by a state or federal resource agency. 9) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the conservation required by this strategy.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1469

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-7 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party 10) It is anticipated that, depending on the availability and relative parcel size of potential conservation sites, some projects within the V5SP may provide land cover mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and the Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment will be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other projects in the V5SP to meet all or a part of the land cover mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be provided to the satisfaction of the City.
11) Because of their particular regulatory status and their biological importance, wetlands shall be accounted for separately through mitigation ratios requiring preservation and or restoration of a set amount of wetted area calculated as a proportion of wetland impact as set forth in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. These wetted acres, along with any upland area that is conserved in association with the wetted acres, will be fully credited towards the required land cover mitigation.

It is intended that all of the wetland mitigation shall be counted towards land cover mitigation requirements. Likewise, all wetted acres contained within land cover mitigation shall be counted towards wetland mitigation.

3.2-1(b):

Concurrent with development of Area A, the project applicant shall preserve mitigation lands at ratios identified in Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2. The preserved land should be of similar agricultural productivity, soil classifications, and farmland type (Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Unique Farmland) as the land proposed for development in Area A. Conservation Easements for agricultural and biological resources may be stacked, meaning that areas preserved to mitigate for biological resources can may also serve as mitigation for agricultural impacts.

Preserve mitigation lands at ratios identified
in Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2
Area A Project applicant During development of
Area A
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.3 Air Quality

3.3-2: Construction of land uses
under the proposed project would
generate criteria pollutant emissions
that could substantially contribute to
a potential violation of applicable air
quality standards or to nonattainment
conditions.

3.3-2a:

The applicant(s) shall implement the following mitigation measures for each phase of development in the time frames provided:
a) Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans, (whichever occurs first), on project sites greater than one acre, the applicant shall submit a Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District. The applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Lincoln that the plan has been submitted to the District. It is the responsibility of the applicant to deliver the approved plan to the local jurisdiction. The applicant shall not break ground prior to receiving District approval of the Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan and delivering that approval to the City of Lincoln. The Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan shall include, but not be limited, to the following measures:
i. In order to control dust, an operational watering truck shall be on site during construction hours. In addition, dry chemical sweeping is prohibited. Watering at the construction site shall be carried out in the compliance with operating APCD rules and City of Lincoln requirements.
ii. Fugitive dust shall not exceed 40% opacity and not go beyond the project boundary at any time as required by District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust (Section 300). If lime or other drying agents are used to dry out wet grading areas, they shall be controlled so as to not exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations.

The prime contractor shall be responsible for having an individual, certified by CARB to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), who shall routinely evaluate compliance to Rule 228, Fugitive Dust on a weekly basis. iii. The track-out of bulk material onto public paved roadways as a result of operations, or erosion, shall be minimized by the use of track-out and erosion control, minimization, and preventative measures. Specifically, the prime contractor shall apply water or use other methods to control dust track out so construction vehicles leaving the site shall reduce dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being released or tracked off-site. Also, the prime contractor “wet broom” the streets (or use another method to control dust as approved by the City) if silt, dirt, mud or debris is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares within one hour from adjacent streets anytime such material track-out extends for a cumulative distance of greater than 50 feet onto any paved public road during active operations.

Submit a Construction Emission/Dust
Control Plan.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1470

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-8 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party iv. Traffic speeds on all unpaved surfaces shall be limited to 15 miles per hour or less.
v. To control dust once grading is complete, the prime contractor shall apply methods such as surface stabilization, establishment of the vegetative cover, paving, or other methods approved by the City.
vi. The prime contractor shall suspend all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous gusts) are high (typically winds greater than 25 miles per hour), and dust is traveling offsite.
vii. Stockpiles of dirt shall be covered when not being used or otherwise controlled to prevent erosion and/or dust.
b) The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e., make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower or greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. If any new equipment is added after submission of the inventory, the prime contractor shall contact the District prior to the new equipment being utilized. At least three business days prior to the use of subject heavy-duty offroad equipment, the project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, name, and phone number of the property owner, project manager, and on-site foreman.

Provide comprehensive construction
equipment inventory and anticipated
construction timeline.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
c) During construction, the contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., electricity) or clean fuel (e.g., propane, gasoline, biodiesel, and/or natural gas) generators rather than temporary diesel power generators, to the degree feasible.

Use existing or cleaner fuels and power
sources, where possible.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
d) During construction, the contractor shall minimize idling time to a maximum of 5 minutes for all diesel-powered equipment.

Minimize engine idling time to a five-minute
maximum.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
e) Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas of the construction site to limit idling to a maximum of 5 minutes.

Provide signage indicating five-minute
maximum time for engine idling.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
f) No open burning of removed vegetation shall be allowed unless permitted by the PCAPCD. All removed vegetation material shall either be chipped on site or taken to an appropriate recycling site, or if a recycling site is not available, a licensed disposal site.

Remove vegetation through chipping or at
an appropriate recycling or disposal site.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
g) A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) caused by the use or manufacture of Cutback or Emulsified asphalts for paving, road construction or road maintenance, unless such manufacture or use complies with the provisions of Rule 217.

Avoid discharging VOCs into the
atmosphere.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
h) Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated.

Maintain proper working condition for all
construction equipment.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1471

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-9 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.3-3: Operational activities
associated with development under
the proposed project would result in
emissions of criteria air pollutants at
levels that would substantially
contribute to a potential violation of
applicable air quality standards or to
nonattainment conditions.

3.3-3:

To reduce operational emissions of ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5, the following PCAPCD Standard Operational Air Quality Mitigation Measures shall be implemented as part of the project’s final design:
a) Diesel trucks shall be prohibited from idling more than five minutes. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall show on the submitted building elevations that all truck loading and unloading docks shall be equipped with one 110/208 volt power outlet for every two dock doors. Diesel Trucks idling for more than the allotted time shall be required to connect to the 110/208 volt power to run any auxiliary equipment. A minimum 2’x3’ signage which indicates “Diesel engine Idling limited to a maximum of five minutes” shall be included with the submittal of building plans.

Implement PCAPCD Standard Operational
Air Quality Mitigation Measures.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor Prior to Building Permit issuance
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
b) Prior to Design Review approval, the Site Plan shall show that the applicant has provided the number of preferential parking spaces for employees that carpool/vanpool/rideshare as required by the District. Such stalls shall be clearly demarcated with signage as approved by the Design Review Board.

Provide preferential parking for employees
that carpool/vanpool/rideshare.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant Prior to Design Review approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
c) Prior to Design Review approval, the applicant shall show that on-site bicycle racks will be provided as required by the District.

Demonstrate provision of on-site bicycle
racks.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant Prior to Design Review approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District

3.3-5: Development under the
proposed project would locate
sensitive residential receptors in
close proximity to SR 65, which
would result in the exposure of
persons to substantial toxic air
contaminant concentrations.

3.3-5:
a) The Specific Plan design guidelines and development standards shall incorporate the following measures to reduce or avoid exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs:
i. New sensitive land uses shall not be permitted within 300 feet of a large gasoline station (defined as a facility with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater). Require a 50-foot separation between gasoline stations with a throughput less than 3.6 million gallons per year.
ii. Only non-perchloroethylene dry-cleaning facilities shall be permitted within the Plan Area.

Reduce TAC exposure by placing new
sensitive lands uses no closer than 300 feet
of a large gasoline station and only permit
non-perchloroethylene dry-cleaning
facilities.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to Design Guidelines
approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) Residential units shall not be constructed at distances less than 100 feet of the edge of the SR 65 right-of-way.

Construct residential units at least 100 feet
from the edge of the SR 65 ROW.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to Design Guidelines
approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.3-7: The proposed project would
result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant
for which the region is in
nonattainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors).

3.3-7:

The applicant(s) shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.3-3 to reduce operational ROG, NOx and PM10 emissions.

See Mitigation Measure 3.3-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.3-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.3-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.3-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.3-3.

3.4 Biological Resources

3.4-1: Implementation of the
proposed project could have a
substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act through direct removal,
placement of fill, hydrological
interruption, or by other means and
would result in fill of jurisdictional
wetlands or other protected waters.

3.4-1:
a) The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below
Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to delineate all wetlands and waters of the U.S. or other protected waters within the proposed development. The delineation(s) shall be submitted to the USACE for verification as part of the formal Section 404 wetland delineation process. If no wetlands are determined to be present, or if wetlands would be avoided, no further mitigation would be required. Prior to fill of any wetlands, or hydrologic interruption of the wetland, the applicant must obtain a Section 404 permit and Provide mitigation at specified ratios. Full Specific Plan, Area A, and Windsor Cove
Project applicant During construction of each
project phase.

City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
United States Army Corps of
Engineers
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1472

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-10 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party obtain Section 401 certification from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
2) For each 1.0 wetted acre of vernal pools impacted, 1.35 acres of vernal pools shall be preserved. For purposes of calculating impact and mitigation requirements, seasonal depressional wetlands shall be considered vernal pools.

For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the preservation requirement may be met by preserving 1.35 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The preservation requirement for open water may be met through preservation of 1.0 acres of open water or any wetland type for each 1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required wetland preservation under this strategy will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland preservation required by any permitting agency.

For each 1.0 acres of vernal pool impact, 1.25 acres of compensatory wetlands shall be restored, enhanced or created including a minimum of 0.75 acres of vernal pool and no more than 0.5 acres of other wetlands. For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the restoration, enhancement, or creation requirement may be met by restoring, enhancing, and/or creating 1.25 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The compensatory requirement for open-water may be met through restoration, enhancement, and/or creation of 1.25 acres of open water or any wetland type for each

1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required compensatory wetland restoration, enhancement, or creation under this measure will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland restoration, enhancement, and creation required by any permitting agency as well as any wetland preservation required by a permitting agency greater than the wetland preservation amount required by this mitigation. The compensatory requirement shall not be reduced below 1.0 by excess preservation.

The mitigation lands are currently used as mostly grassland/pasture and fallow/idle cropland, with some areas used to grow winter wheat, hay/non-alfalfa, and other crops. The mitigation lands are largely surrounded by fallow/idle cropland, rice fields, hay/non-alfalfa fields, and active cropland used for growing clover/wildflowers, rye, corn, and other rotational crops. Management of the mitigation lands could be modified to provide greater benefit to special-status plant and wildlife species.
3) Wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation shall be accompanied by the associated uplands and hydrology necessary to sustain long-term viability in a natural or restored environmental setting. 4) It is anticipated that most wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation may be accomplished on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement and will be subject to the required conservation easements and management plans. If additional lands are conserved to meet the wetland mitigation requirement, the same requirements for conservation easements and management plans shall apply.
5) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this strategy. 6) The density of wetlands on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement in some projects within the V5SP may provide wetland mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment shall be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1473

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-11 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party projects in the Plan Area to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City.
7) The City may allow mitigation located outside of Placer County that advances the City’s conservation goals and meets the biological intent of this mitigation strategy. In addition, the City may accept credits from out-of-county conservation or mitigation banks towards full or partial compliance with this strategy if the project is within the agency-approved service area for the credits.

Avoidance and Minimization Measures
8) Prior to any construction activities that could impact protected waters, a protective fence shall be erected around the boundaries of avoided wetlands, including a protective buffer as dictated in the 401, 404, or 1600 permits as described in section 9) below. This fence shall remain in place until all construction activity in the immediate area is completed. No activity shall be permitted within the protected areas except for those expressly permitted by the USACE and/or CDFW.
9) A construction buffer shall be provided along all avoided wetlands in accordance with the Section 404 permit, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Only those uses allowed in the Section 404 permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreements shall be permitted in the wetlands preserve and its buffer.
10) Water quality in the avoided wetlands shall be protected during construction in the watershed by using erosion control techniques including (as appropriate), but not necessarily limited to, preservation of existing vegetation, mulches (e.g., hydraulic, straw, wood), and geotextiles and mats. Additionally, urban runoff shall be managed to protect water quality in the wetlands preserve using techniques such as velocity dissipation devices, sediment basins and pollution collection devices.

3.4-2: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in
adverse impacts to special-status
species, either directly or through
habitat modifications.

3.4-2:
a) The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

For species that are not directly covered by the PCCP, the project applicant shall implement the following avoidance and minimization measures:
1) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-6. 2) For the protection of American badger, the project applicant, for each project phase, shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction American badger den survey within the project site. The results of the survey shall be provided to the City of Lincoln. If dens or burrows determined to be potential American badger dens are found within the project site or off-site improvement areas during the preconstruction surveys, consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) shall occur prior to the initiation of any construction activities to determine an appropriate burrow excavation and/or relocation method. If American badger burrows are not found, further measures are not necessary. All survey results shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln prior to the initiation of any construction activities.

Implement PCCP measures related to
habitat preservation.

Implement avoidance and minimization
measures for impacts to special status
species that are not covered by the PCCP.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
United States Fish and Wildlife
Service
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant shall obtain a Biological Opinion and any applicable incidental take authorization from USFWS and comply with the conditions and requirements therein.
2) The project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City, a Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that implements the open space, agricultural land and biological resources strategy and includes the following elements:

Implement habitat preservation at identified
ratios.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
United States Fish and Wildlife
Service
i. Identification and quantification of land cover and wetland removal and applicable mitigation requirements set forth below in subsection (5).

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1474

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-12 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party ii. Identification and quantification of proposed mitigation lands and/or resources with sufficient detail to allow for City evaluation, including plans for restoration, enhancement and/or creation of wetlands.
iii. Identification of any conservation or mitigation bank credits or assignment of excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP.
iv. Draft conservation easements and draft management and monitoring plans, if applicable.
v. An endowment for long-term management of the proposed mitigation lands. 3) Any Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan must be approved by the City, in its sole discretion, at the time of the approval of any improvement plans for subdivision improvements or off-site infrastructure, recordation of a final map (not including a large lot final map that results in no disturbance of any existing natural condition), or issuance of any project-level discretionary approval for non-residential land uses that does not require a tentative subdivision map. A Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan may cover a development project or group of projects and must include any required off-site infrastructure unless covered by a separate project-level mitigation plan for that infrastructure improvement. The City may require the applicant to provide a conceptual plan for the Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that includes a calculation of acres of impact and acres of required mitigation prior to approval of a General Development Program or tentative map. A tentative map may have more than one Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan if the development authorized by the map is owned by separate owners. 4) Each project (including off-site infrastructure) must demonstrate compliance with an approved Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan prior to approval of a grading permit that results in land cover or wetland impact. Such compliance may be phased with the actual development of the project. Demonstration of compliance shall include:
i. Demonstrate recordation of required easements for land conservation. ii. Demonstrate ownership of applicable credits and/or assignment of any applicable excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP. iii. Demonstrate implementation of an endowment for the management of all mitigation lands.
iv. Demonstrate approval of construction and monitoring plans for any required restoration, enhancement, or creation of wetlands. Provide proof of executed contracts and initiation of construction.
v. Documentation and approval of any mitigation credits eligible for future use or assignment.
5) An Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan shall require that for every 1.0 acres of land cover impacted, 1.35 acres of land will be conserved in perpetuity. The impact area shall be calculated to the nearest onetenth (0.10) acre. The total amount of required acreage will be automatically reduced by any and all off-site conservation or mitigation land required by any permitting agency, specifically including upland areas required in association with wetland mitigation, whether acquired through mitigation bank credits or other means. The mitigation land to be conserved may be located in the Reserve Acquisition Areas, or elsewhere as determined by the City and regulatory agencies. No additional land mitigation will be required beyond the 1.35 to 1.0 requirement for the removal of land cover.
6) To determine the acreage of land cover impact, all land within the V5SP shall be considered to be “land cover,” except for land that is already developed with infrastructure, such as roadways, and homes and related development such as accessory structures, driveways, improved roadways, and landscaped areas.

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-13 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party in other areas deemed adequate by the regulatory agencies. Impacts to annual grassland, vernal pool grassland, and pasture lands cover shall be mitigated on existing or restorable grassland. All other land cover impacts may be mitigated on any natural or semi-natural land within the Reserve Acquisition Areas, specifically including agricultural land. Vernal pool grassland will be mitigated by any grassland without regard to wetted area density.
8) Conservation sites shall be subject to recorded conservation easements and management plans with an identified funding source for long-term management of conserved lands. The conservation easements and management plans are subject to approval by the City and shall provide for the long-term maintenance of biological functions and values while, whenever feasible, also providing for compatible agricultural use. The City shall accept as satisfactory mitigation any conservation easement and/or management plan required and approved by the terms and conditions of any permit issued by a state or federal resource agency. 9) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the conservation required by this strategy.

Specifically, the uplands associated with any bank wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement or creation may be applied towards the land cover mitigation requirement provided that the uplands are subject to an appropriate conservation easement and the applicant can demonstrate that the approved mitigation credits include both wetland and upland land cover to the satisfaction of the City. Mitigation and conservation banks must be approved by the USFWS, USACE, or the CDFW. Credits can count toward mitigation obligations if the banks are consistent with the requirements of state and federal natural resources agencies, as accepted by the City.
10) It is anticipated that, depending on the availability and relative parcel size of potential conservation sites, some projects within the V5SP may provide land cover mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and the Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment will be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other projects in the V5SP to meet all or a part of the land cover mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be provided to the satisfaction of the City.
11) Because of their particular regulatory status and their biological importance, wetlands shall be accounted for separately through mitigation ratios requiring preservation and or restoration of a set amount of wetted area calculated as a proportion of wetland impact as set forth in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. These wetted acres, along with any upland area that is conserved in association with the wetted acres, will be fully credited towards the required land cover mitigation.

The provisions contained herein only apply if Crotch’s bumble bee remains a candidate species or is listed under CESA at the commencement of construction.

Initial ground-disturbing activities associated with development of any future Tentative Map (e.g., grading, vegetation removal, staging) should take place between September 1 and March 31 (i.e., outside the colony active period) to avoid potential impacts on special-status bumble bees. If initial ground-disturbing activities does not occur between September 1 and March 31, then at a maximum of 14 days prior to the commencement of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey for Crotch’s bumble bees in the area(s) proposed for impact.

The survey shall occur during the period from one hour after sunrise to two hours before sunset, with temperatures between 65 degrees Fahrenheit and 90 degrees Fahrenheit, with low wind and zero rain. If the timing of the start of construction makes the survey infeasible due to the temperature requirements, the surveying biologist shall select the most appropriate days based on the Require ground-disturbing activities to take
place between September 1 and March 31,
or conduct a preconstruction survey for
Crotch’s bumble bees in the area(s)
proposed for impact
Village 7B Area Project applicant If Crotch’s bumble bee remains a candidate
species or is listed under
CESA 14 days prior to the
commencement of
construction activities, if
initial ground-disturbing
activities are not all
completed between
September 1 and March 31.

City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1476

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-14 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party National Weather Service seven-day forecast and shall survey at a time of day that is closest to the temperature range stated above. The survey duration shall be commensurate with the physical extent of suitable floral resources (which represent foraging habitat) present within the area proposed for impact, and the level of effort shall be based on the metric of a minimum of one person-hour of searching per three acres of suitable floral resources/foraging habitat. A meandering pedestrian survey shall be conducted throughout the area proposed for impact in order to identify patches of suitable floral resources.

Suitable floral resources for Crotch’s bumble bee include species in the following families: Apocynaceae, Asteraceae, Boraginaceae, Fabaceae, and Lamiaceae.

Suitable floral resources for western bumble bee include species in the following families: Asteraceae, Fabaceae, Rhamnaceae, and Rosaceae, as well as plants in the genera Eriogonum and Penstemon.

At a minimum, preconstruction survey methods shall include the following:
• Search areas with floral resources for foraging bumble bees. Observed foraging activity may indicate a nest is nearby, and therefore, the survey duration shall be increased when foraging bumble bees are present; • If Crotch’s bumble bees are observed, watch any Crotch’s bumble bees present and observe their flight patterns. Attempt to track their movements between foraging areas and the nest;
• Visually look for nest entrances. Observe burrows, any other underground cavities, logs, or other possible nesting habitat;
• If floral resources or other vegetation preclude observance of the nest, small areas of vegetation may be removed via hand removal, line trimming, or mowing to a height of a minimum of four inches to assist with locating the nest; • Look for concentrated Crotch’s bumble bee activity;
• Listen for the humming of a nest colony; and
• If bumble bees are observed, attempt to photograph the individual and identify it to species.

If bumble bees are not located during the preconstruction survey or the bumble bees located are definitively identified as a common species (i.e., not specialstatus species), then further mitigation or coordination with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is not required.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1477

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-15 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Specific required permit conditions may include, but not be limited to, the Project applicant’s qualified biologist translocating nesting substrate in accordance with the latest scientific research to another suitable location (i.e., a location that supports similar or better floral resources as the impact area), enhancing floral resources on areas of the site that will remain appropriate habitat, worker awareness training, and/or other measures specified by CDFW.

Mitigation Measure Biological Resources 2
Prior to the commencement of construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a bat habitat assessment of all potential roosting habitat features, including trees and structures within the proposed impact footprint within the project vicinity. The habitat assessment shall identify all potentially suitable roosting habitat and may be conducted up to one year prior to the start of construction. The results of the assessment shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln Community Development Department.
• If potential roosting habitat is identified (cavities in trees or potential roosts within structures) within the areas proposed for impact, the biologist shall survey the potential roosting habitat during the active season (generally April through October or from January through March on days with temperatures in excess of 50 degrees Fahrenheit) to determine the presence of roosting bats.

The surveys are recommended to be conducted utilizing methods that are considered acceptable by bat experts after consultation with CDFW. Methods may include evening emergence surveys, acoustic surveys, inspecting potential roosting habitat with fiberoptic cameras, or a combination thereof. • If roosting bats are identified within any of the trees planned for removal, or if presence is assumed, the trees shall be removed outside of pup season, only on days with temperatures in excess of 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Pup season is generally during the months of May through August. Two-step tree removal shall be utilized under the supervision of the qualified biologist. Two-step tree removal involves removal of all branches of the tree that do not provide roosting habitat on the first day, and then the next day cutting down the remaining portion of the tree.
• Additionally, it is recommended that all other tree removal shall be conducted from January through March on days with temperatures in excess of 50 degrees Fahrenheit to avoid potential impacts to foliage-roosting bat species. • If roosting bats are identified within any structures planned for removal, a bat exclusion plan shall be prepared by a qualified bat biologist describing the methods to be used to humanely exclude bats prior to disturbance. The plan shall be approved by the City of Lincoln Community Development Department after consultation with CDFW and shall be implemented prior to the start of construction.
• The requirements for the bat expert and City to consult with CDFW prior to approving survey methods and a bat exclusion plan shall be satisfied either where CDFW responds to requests for consultation within 30 days of the requests or where the bat expert and City have attempted to consult with CDFW but CDFW has failed to respond to the request within 30 days of the placement of the request.

Conduct a bat habitat assessment to
identify all potentially suitable roosting
habitat; if potential roosting habitat is
identified, perform surveys during the active
season; require trees planned for removal to
be removed outside of pup season; and
prepare a bat exclusion plan if roosting bats
are identified within any structures planned
for removal.

Village 7B area. Project applicant Up to one year prior to the start of construction during
the active season, or if
roosting bats are identified
within any trees planned for
removal
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.4-3: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss and/or degradation of vernal
pool habitat, and the loss of specialstatus vernal pool crustaceans or amphibians.

3.4-3:
a) The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1 and 3.4-2. See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1 and 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1 and 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1 and 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1
and 3.4-2.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1478

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-16 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Avoidance and Minimization Measures
c) Orange exclusionary fencing shall be placed, and a buffer area of 250 feet (or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS) maintained, around any avoided (preserved) vernal pool crustacean or western spadefoot toad habitat during construction to prevent impacts from construction vehicles and equipment. This fencing shall be inspected by a qualified biologist throughout the construction period to ensure that it is in good functional condition.

Provide fenced buffer area of 250 feet. Full Specific Plan, Area A, and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
d) Prior to beginning work on a project site, all on-site construction personnel shall receive instruction regarding the presence of listed species and the importance of avoiding impacts to these species and their habitat.

Instruct construction personnel about listed
species and avoiding impacts.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.4-4: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss and/or degradation of rare plant
populations.

3.4-4:
a) For Areas B through J, the project applicant(s) for each phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused botanical surveys in vernal pool complexes, fresh emergent marsh, seasonal wetlands and nonnative annual grassland habitats within the Plan Area for special-status plant species including, but not limited to, pincushion navarretia, dwarf downingia, slender Orcutt grass, Sanford’s arrowhead, and bigscale balsamroot during the appropriate time of year to detect each of these species.

In order to determine the appropriate survey window, the qualified biologist shall visit reference populations when such populations are available and accessible. If no special-status plants are located during the surveys, no mitigation would be required.

Conduct botanical surveys to determine
presence of special status plant species.

Areas B through J Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife
b) If special-status plant species are located during surveys in areas proposed for ground disturbance, the project applicant for each project shall mitigate for impacts to vernal pool wetlands and complexes as described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-3, for impacts to grasslands as described in Mitigation Measure3.4-2, and for wetlands as described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. The applicant shall also report the plant survey results to CDFW using a CNDDB field survey form. In addition, the applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to develop and implement a special-status plant salvage and transplantation plan that shall be approved by CDFW. The plan shall provide for the salvage of seeds of the impacted special-status plants and soil from the site surrounding those plants. The salvaged seeds and soil shall be transplanted to a protected site with appropriate habitat. To ensure the success of transplantation and the species, the applicant shall monitor the protected site for three years from the date of transplantation.

If special-status plant species are found,
implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-3 for
vernal pool wetlands, Mitigation Measure

3.4-2 for grasslands, and Mitigation
Measure 3.4-1 for wetlands. Use a CNDDB
survey form to report results to CDFW.

Areas B through J Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife
c) If state or federally-listed plants are found during surveys, project applicant for each project phase shall consult with CDFW to obtain an Incidental Take Permit under Section 2081 of the CESA and comply with the conditions and requirements therein, and/or USFWS to obtain a Biological Opinion under Section 7 of FESA and comply with the conditions and requirements.

If state or federally-listed species are found,
obtain Incidental Take Permit from CDFW
and comply with USFWS requirements.

Areas B through J Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife, United States Fish
and Wildlife Service

3.4-5: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss of western pond turtle and/or
degradation of potential habitat.

3.4-5:
a) The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) Prior to project construction for each phase that would disturb any potential habitat for western pond turtle, the project applicant(s) for such phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys of potential habitat and the vicinity (250 feet) within 30 days prior to project construction. If no western pond turtles are located, no mitigation would be required and construction could proceed.
2) If western pond turtles are determined to be present, and potential habitat is not proposed for modification due to development of the site, then exclusionary fencing shall be used to prevent the turtle(s) from entering the construction area.

The location of the fence shall be determined by a qualified biologist. Retained habitat shall also be protected through implementation of water quality and Implement habitat preservation at identified
ratios
Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1479

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-17 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party hydrology measures that ensure habitat remains viable post-construction as required for Clean Water Act Sections 401 and 404 permits and would be consistent with the Draft PCCP.
3) If occupied habitat would be impacted or lost, the project applicant(s) for each phase shall retain a qualified biologist approved by the CDFW to relocate all potentially affected western pond turtles into suitable habitat. Lost habitat would be mitigated through the Sections 401 and 404 permitting process, and would be consistent with the Draft PCCP.

3.4-6: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss or disturbance of nesting birds
and the loss or degradation of
special-status bird nesting and
foraging habitat.

3.4-6:
a) The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b) and/or (c), below, as applicable.

For special-status bird species that are not covered under the PCCP, the mitigation measures for nesting habitat in Mitigation Measure 3.4-6(c) shall be implemented.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Implement avoidance and minimization
measures for impacts to special status
species that are not covered by the PCCP.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-2(b)(2)-(10). See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).
c) If the PCCP is not in operation or the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established, the following mitigation measures for nesting habitat shall apply:
1) If construction activity that may disturb nesting birds (according to a qualified biologist) occurs during the nesting season (February 15 - September 1), the project applicant(s) for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre-construction breeding-season survey of the project site at least 30 days prior to onset of construction. Surveys for nesting raptors shall be conducted within ¼ mile of proposed construction activities. A survey for nesting birds shall be conducted within 500 feet of construction areas to determine if any birds are nesting on or within 500 feet of the project site. The results of the survey shall be valid only for the season when it is conducted. New surveys shall be conducted if construction of the surveyed area extends into the following season or if construction is suspended for more than 14 days during the nesting season, or if there is a substantial change in the level of disturbance at the site, unless all the potential nesting trees or other habitat have been removed. 2) If the pre-construction survey does not identify any protected raptor or bird nests on or within the buffers to the project site, no mitigation shall be required.

However, should any active nests be located within 500 feet of a proposed construction area at any time throughout the construction, the project applicant(s) for each project phase, in consultation with CDFW, shall avoid all bird nest sites located in the project site disturbance area(s) during the breeding season (approximately February 15 - September 1) while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction in close proximity to the nest during the nesting season or establishing a non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site. The size of the buffer zone shall be determined in consultation with CDFW. The buffer zone shall be delineated by orange temporary construction fencing. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer in use. Should construction activities cause the nesting bird to vocalize, make defensive flights at intruders, get up from a brooding position, or fly off the nest, then a qualified biologist should identify an increased exclusionary buffer such that activities are far enough from the nest to stop this agitated behavior.

Additional Measures for Swainson’s Hawk
3) The project applicant(s) for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a Swainson’s hawk nesting survey within the area to be disturbed, extending out to one-half mile. The survey shall be conducted during the nesting season of the same calendar year that construction is expected to begin, and Conduct any tree removal and construction
activities according to the protocol
described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-6(c).

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During construction per the time frames described in
Mitigation Measure 3.4-6(c)
for tree removal and
construction activities
between March 15 and
August 30.

City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
prior to the issuance of any grading permits. If this survey does not identify any nesting Swainson’s hawk in the area within the project site that will be disturbed plus the one-half mile radius, no mitigation would be required.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1480

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-18 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party 4) Should any active Swainson’s hawk nests be located within one-half mile of the disturbance area, no project-related activities that could cause nest abandonment or forced fledging (such as heavy equipment operation), shall be initiated within the one-quarter mile (buffer zone) of an active nest between March 1 and September 15. If high quality Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat would be removed (i.e., alfalfa fields and pasture), then the applicant shall purchase mitigation credits for Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat at a CDFWapproved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.35:1 or protect similar value agricultural land at a ratio of 1.35:1 with a conservation easement that maintains the land in high-value Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat in perpetuity, consistent with Mitigation Measure 3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

Additional Measures for Burrowing Owl
5) Prior to project construction the project applicant(s) for each project phase shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct both nesting and wintering season surveys for burrowing owl to determine if potential habitat within 500 feet of ground disturbance is used by this species. The timing and methodology for the surveys shall be based on the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. A qualified biologist will conduct four survey visits: 1) at least one visit between February 15 and April 15, and 2) a minimum of three survey visits, at least three weeks apart between April 15 and July 1. If feasible, at least one visit will occur after June 15.

Surveys will be conducted within areas that, according to the qualified biologist, could support burrowing owl nesting habitat at the project site and within 150 meters of areas that will be directly or indirectly impacted by the project, if feasible.
6) If burrowing owls are discovered during the surveys, the project applicant shall notify the CDFW. A qualified biologist shall monitor the owls and establish a fenced exclusion zone around each occupied burrow. No construction activities shall be allowed within the exclusion buffer zone until such time that the burrows are determined to be unoccupied by a qualified biologist. The buffer zones shall be a minimum of 150 feet from an occupied burrow during the non-breeding season (September 1 through January 31), and a minimum of 250 feet from an occupied burrow during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31). 7) If complete avoidance is not feasible, the CDFW shall be consulted regarding a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan. All activities that will result in a disturbance to burrows shall be approved by CDFW prior to implementation.

Additional Measures for Tricolored Blackbird
8) Prior to project construction the project applicant(s) for each project phase shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct a tricolored blackbird nesting survey within the area to be disturbed, targeting potential breeding habitat such as emergent marsh, riparian thickets, and blackberry brambles. Two surveys shall be conducted at least three weeks apart between March 15 and September 1 within 500 feet of the area subject to ground disturbance. If a nesting colony is found within the survey area the project applicant(s) shall consult with CDFW to develop a Tricolored Blackbird Mitigation Plan to avoid, minimize and compensate for impacts to occupied nesting habitat and adjacent foraging habitat. Mitigation measures may include work windows (March 15 to September 1) to avoid impacting an active on-site nesting colony, purchasing conservation easements to protect occupied nesting and foraging habitat, or other measures mutually agreed upon by the applicant(s) and CDFW.

3.4-7: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss of valley elderberry longhorn
beetle and/or loss or degradation of
potential habitat.

3.4-7:
a) The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP, which shall be deemed to mitigate for impacts to the VELB. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (c)-(e), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Protect elderberry shrubs as described in
Mitigation Measures 3.4-7(c) through

3.4-7(e).

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
c) For construction requiring consultation under Section 7 of the FESA, the project applicant shall obtain incidental take authorization and comply with the requirements therein. If no Section 7 consultation is required (because no federal permit is required), the applicant shall comply with mitigation measures (d) through (f).

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1481

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-19 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party d) The removal of elderberry shrubs or their stems measuring one inch or greater (removal or trimming) shall be compensated for by salvaging and planting the affected elderberry shrubs and planting additional elderberry shrubs and associated native riparian plants at a 1:1 ratio. Mitigation planting shall occur, to the maximum extent practicable, in areas adjacent to the impact area and/or located to fill in existing gaps in riparian corridors. If the plants to be removed show recent boring holes, the project applicants shall consult with the USFWS and obtain incidental take authorization prior to removal.
e) Elderberry shrubs with stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level that are not proposed to be removed shall be protected as follows during construction:

1. Any ground disturbing activities within 100 feet of elderberry plants containing stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level shall provide a minimum setback of at least 20 feet from the drip line of each elderberry plant containing stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level. The setbacks shall be fenced and flagged to prohibit equipment and materials encroachment into the setback zone. Fire fuel breaks (disked land) may not be included within the 20-foot setback.

2. The project applicant shall brief the construction foreman on the need to avoid damaging the elderberry plants (unless the proper take authorization is obtained) and the possible penalties for not complying with these requirements. A copy of these mitigation measures shall be provided to the construction foreman for his distribution to his crews by the project applicant.

3. No insecticides, herbicides, fertilizers, or other chemicals that might harm the beetle or its host plant shall be used in the buffer areas, or within 100 feet of any elderberry plant with one or more stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level.

4. No mowing shall occur closer than five feet to elderberry plant stems. Mowing shall be done in a manner that avoids damaging elderberry plants (e.g., avoid stripping away bark through careless use of mowing/trimming equipment).

5. Trimming of elderberry stems less than one inch in diameter may occur between September 1 and March 14. The elderberry plants shall only be trimmed between November through the first two weeks in February, or when the plants are dormant and after they have lost their leaves.

3.4-8: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in
changes to surface water quality in
Auburn Ravine that could affect
Central Valley Steelhead and
Chinook salmon due to the
reconstruction and/or widening of
various bridges within the Plan Area.

3.4-8:
a) The project applicant(s) (be they the City, County, or another agency) shall comply with the PCCP and mitigate for impacts to Central Valley steelhead and Chinook salmon as stated in the PCCP. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the project applicant(s) (be they the City, County, or another agency) shall comply with the following mitigation measures:
1) Obtain a Biological Opinion and incidental take authorization for Central Valley steelhead and winter-run and spring-run Chinook salmon from NMFS and comply with the conditions and requirements therein.
2) Obtain any necessary permits from the USACE, CDFW, and the RWQCB.

Dewatering plans and the specific temporary impacts to Auburn Ravine associated with bridge construction shall be discussed in the permit applications and avoidance and minimization measures shall be proposed, including timing of construction to avoid presence of steelhead and Chinook salmon, fish rescue and relocation, as well as specific BMPs to avoid impacts to these species and their habitat. The permit requirements shall include the following elements:
• In-water construction work windows shall be observed in consultation with NMFS and CDFW, and as specified in the permits issued.

Protect Central Valley steelhead and winterrun and spring-run Chinook salmon as described in Mitigation Measures 3.4-8(b).

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
• Applicant(s) shall implement a pile driving, dewatering and fish rescue plan.

The plan shall include specific measures to avoid and minimize impacts to salmonids and their habitats during bridge construction, and shall be approved by NMFS and CDFW.
3) Install Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) fences within 200 feet of work along Auburn Ravine, as indicated in the 401 or 404 permits. The ESA fencing shall be Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1482

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-20 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party delineated on the final plans for each project phase and the fence shall be installed and remain on-site until construction within 200 feet of the Auburn Ravine preserve area is completed.
4) Implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1 and construction best management practices (BMPs) as prescribed in the project’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared in accordance with the California National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, NPDES No. CAR000002). These BMPs shall be in place throughout the construction for each project phase. The SWPPP shall include specific measures for water conservation; vehicle and equipment cleaning, fueling and maintenance; dewatering; paving and grinding; concrete finishing and curing; directing water away from work areas; use of attachments on construction equipment to catch debris; use of approved covers or platforms to collect debris; stockpiling of accumulated debris and waste generated during demolition away from watercourses; and ensuring safe passage of wildlife, as necessary.

3.4-9: Implementation of the
proposed project could have a
substantial adverse effect on riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural
communities identified in local, state,
or federal plans, policies, or
regulations.

3.4-9:
a) The project applicant(s) shall comply with the PCCP and mitigate for impacts to and loss of sensitive natural communities as stated in the PCCP. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the project applicant(s) shall comply with Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2,

3.4-3, 3.4-4, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3,

3.4-4, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,
and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,
and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,
and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, and 3.10-1.

3.4-11: Implementation of the
proposed project could conflict with
the provisions of approved local,
regional or state policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance.

3.4-11:
a) For impacts to threatened or endangered vegetation, the project applicant(s) shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, 3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4 9, and 3.10-1 as applicable.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3,

3.4-4, 3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8, 3.4 9, and

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,

3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4-9, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,

3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4 9, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,

3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4 9, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, 3.4-5, 3.4-6,

3.4-7, 3.4-8, 3.4 9, and 3.10-1.
b) For impacts to heritage oak trees, the project applicant(s) shall first make every reasonable attempt to avoid any heritage oak tree by designing around it. If a heritage oak tree cannot be avoided due to health, safety, and welfare risks, the project applicant(s) shall provide the following mitigation:
i. Submit a justification statement as to why the heritage tree(s) cannot be preserved in place to the City’s Community Development Director. ii. Provide a Site Plan with proposed development which also identifies the location of the heritage tree(s) to be removed.

Protect heritage oak trees by making every
reasonable attempt, and if inevitable, submit
a justification statement to the City’s
Community Development Director, identify
oak trees to be removed on the site plan,
and replace oak trees inch by inch.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
iii. If the Community Development Director deems the justification statement to be valid, the project applicant(s) shall mitigate the loss of heritage oak trees on an inch for inch basis. Specifically, for every inch of heritage oak tree removed, an inch of oak tree shall be planted. All new plantings shall be plantings in a minimum of 15 gallon pots, and shall be of the same species of oak as was being removed and replaced, and shall, if feasible, be located on the property from which the heritage oak tree was removed. Project applicant(s) shall submit to the City’s Community Development Director a revegetation plan for his/her review and approval. The project applicant(s) shall irrigate and maintain the new plantings for a minimum of three years, at which time a licensed arborist shall opine as to whether the trees are sufficiently established to release the project applicant(s) from continuing to irrigate and maintain the plantings. Any replacement trees which die before the end of the irrigation and maintenance obligations shall be replaced at a 1:1 ratio.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1483

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-21 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.4-13: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
a cumulative substantial adverse
effect on federally protected wetlands
defined by Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act through direct removal,
placement of fill, hydrological
interruption, or by other means and
would result in fill of jurisdictional
wetlands or other protected waters.

3.4-13:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-1.

3.4-14: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss and/or degradation of
vernal pool habitat, and the loss of
special-status vernal pool
crustaceans or amphibians.

3.4-14:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, and

3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

3.4-15: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss and/or degradation of
rare plant populations.

3.4-15:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and 3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3,
and 3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and

3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and

3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and

3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, 3.4-3, and 3.4-4.

3.4-16: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss of western pond
turtle and/or degradation of potential
habitat.

3.4-16:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-5. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-5.

3.4-17: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss or disturbance of
nesting birds and the loss or
degradation of special-status bird
habitat.

3.4-17:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-6. See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2
and 3.4-6.

3.4-18: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss of valley elderberry
longhorn beetle and/or degradation of
potential habitat.

3.4-18:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-7. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-7.

3.4-19: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative changes to surface water
quality in Auburn Ravine that could
affect Central Valley steelhead and
Chinook salmon due to the widening
or construction of bridges within
western Placer County.

3.4-19:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-8. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-8.

3.4-20: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
a cumulative substantial adverse
effect on riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural communities
identified in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations or by CDFW
or USFWS.

3.4-20:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-9. See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2
and 3.4-9.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1484

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-22 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.5 Climate Change

3.5-1: Construction and operation of
the proposed project would result in a
cumulatively considerable increase in
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
that could conflict with an applicable
plan, policy or regulation of an
appropriate regulatory agency
adopted for the purpose of reducing
GHG emissions.

3.5-1:

The following mitigation measures are based on measures identified by the project applicant, by the PCAPCD, by the California Attorney General, and by CAPCOA. The following measures focus primarily on non-transportation energy efficiency. Measures associated with reducing transportation emissions have already been incorporated into the GHG emission estimates shown in Table 3.5-1. The following measures will ensure that all Title 24 requirements are met and will further reduce GHG emissions through energy efficiency improvements.

All residential buildings shall:
• Meet or exceed CalGreen Tier 2 requirements in place at the time of Building Permit issuance.
• Be pre-plumbed and structurally engineered for the future installation of a complete solar energy system.
• Include a tankless water heating system, a whole house ceiling fan, and “Energy Star” appliances (stoves, dishwashers, and any other appliances typically included within the initial installation by the builder).
• Include an energy efficient air conditioning unit(s) that exceeds the SEER ratio by a minimum of two points at the time of building permit issuance. • Include programmable thermostat timers.
• Include exterior outlets on all single-family and multi-family buildings to allow the use of electrically-powered landscape equipment.
• Include wiring for at least one electric car charging station. • Meet the 2016 Plumbing Code on all residences to reduce indoor and outdoor water use in installing low-flow bathroom faucets, kitchen faucets, toilets, and showers, and landscaping that uses water-efficient, drought resistant plants, and water-saving irrigation systems. Additionally, all residential units shall be pre-plumbed to enable the reuse of graywater systems.
• Not include wood-burning fireplaces, woodstoves, and other similar wood-burning devices. This prohibition shall be included in any covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) that are established.
• Provide covered storage facilities for securing bicycles for 15 percent or more of building occupants (multi-family housing units).
• Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall establish tree planting guidelines that require residents to plant trees to shade buildings primarily on the west and south sides of buildings. Recommended use of deciduous trees (to allow solar gain during the winter) and direct shading of air conditioning systems shall be included in the guidelines.

Meet all Title 24 requirements. Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction Placer County Air Pollution District, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
All non-residential structures within the Plan Area shall:
• Be pre-plumbed and structurally engineered for the future installation of a complete solar energy system.
• Install photovoltaic rooftop energy systems on all community buildings and any commercial buildings over 100,000 square feet.
• Use “Energy Star” rated (or greater) roofing materials. • Use both indoor and outdoor energy efficient lighting that meets or exceeds Title 24 requirements.
• Include an energy efficient heating system and an air conditioning system that exceeds the SEER ratio by a minimum of two points at the time of building permit issuance.
• Only use low flow water fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets, showers, etc. • Only use programmable thermostat timers.
• Include enough bike parking facilities to meet peak demand. Bike parking shall also be included near all transit locations that are developed during the course of this Plan. This will include providing secure bicycle racks and/or storage within 200 yards of a building entrance for five percent or more of all Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff (measured at peak periods) and provide showers and changing facilities in the Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1485

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-23 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party building, or within 200 yards of a primary staff building entrance, for 0.5 percent of FTE staff (measured at peak periods), or
• Provide secure bike racks and/or storage within 200 yards of a public building entrance according to the following guidelines based on project square footage:
• Up to 5,000 square feet, two or more bicycle racks,
• 5,001 – 20,000 square feet, three or more bicycle racks, • 20,001 – 50,000 square feet, six or more bicycle racks, • More than 50,000 square feet, ten or more bicycle racks. • Install two 110/208 volt power outlets for every two loading docks. • Reserve a minimum of five percent of the total customer parking spaces within commercial and retail parking lots for electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, alternative fueled vehicles, and carpools.
• Install electric vehicle charging stations for a minimum of three percent of the total vehicle parking capacity of the site.
• Include pedestrian-friendly paths and cross walks in all parking lots. • Pave all parking lots with reflective coatings (albedo = 0.30 or better). This measure is considered feasible if the additional cost is less than 10 percent of the cost of applying a standard asphalt product.

In addition to the above measures, the following shall also be incorporated:
• Prior to project approval, the applicant shall only show energy efficient lighting for all street, parking, and area lighting associated with the V5SP. The applicant shall also work to limit the hours of operation of outdoor lights through the use of timers and/or motion sensors, to the extent that these strategies do not compromise public safety. • Any new park areas within the Plan Area shall include bicycle racks at appropriate locations and a community notice board and information kiosk within information about community events, ridesharing, and commute alternatives. • Prior to issue of an occupancy permit within the Plan Area, the applicant shall create informational materials informing occupants of the alternative travel amenities provided, including ridesharing and public transit availability schedules and the Plan Area’s pedestrian bicycle, and equestrian paths to community centers, shopping areas, employment areas, schools, parks, and recreation areas. • Maximize the amount of drought tolerant landscaping by minimizing the amount of turf in all areas where this option is feasible.

3.6 Cultural Resources

3.6-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would adversely
impact historic architectural
resources directly through demolition
or substantial alteration, or indirectly
through changes to historical setting.

3.6-1:

When project-level development plans outside of Area A or Windsor Cove are submitted to the City of Lincoln for approval, the project proponent shall be required to complete a cultural resources investigation for review and approval by the City that includes, at a minimum:
• An updated records search at the North Central Information Center; • An intensive cultural resources survey, documenting and evaluating resources 45 years or older within and adjacent to the project footprint for listing in the California or National Registers;
• A report disseminating the results of this research; and, • Recommendations for additional mitigation to resolve adverse impacts to recorded cultural resources.

The survey shall be carried out by a qualified historian or architectural historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Architectural History, and can be compiled in the same document as Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(a). Demolition or substantial alteration of all previously recorded historic resources, including significant historic resources encountered during the survey and evaluation efforts, shall be avoided. Any alterations, including relocation, to historic buildings or structures shall conform to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings. If avoidance of identified historic resources is deemed infeasible, the City shall prepare a treatment Complete a cultural resources investigation. Full Specific Plan, apart from Area A and Windsor
Cove
Project applicant Prior to project-level
development plan submittal
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1486

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-24 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party plan to include, but not limited to, adaptive reuse, photo-documentation and public interpretation of the resource.

If avoidance, adaptive reuse, or relocation of an historic resource is determined infeasible, a qualified architectural historian shall be retained to document the affected historic resource in accordance with the National Park Service’s Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and/or Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) standards. Such standards typically include large format photography using (4x5) negatives, written data, and copies of original plans if available. The HABS/HAER documentation packages shall be archived at local libraries and historical repositories, as well as the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System. Public interpretation of historic resources at their original site shall also occur in the form of a plaque, kiosk or other method of describing the building’s historic or architectural importance to the general public. These mitigation actions will be undertaken at the developer’s expense.

3.6-2: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in
damage or destruction of known or
previously unidentified unique
archaeological resources.

3.6-2(a):

When project-level development plans outside of Area A or Windsor Cove are submitted to the City of Lincoln for approval, the project proponent shall be required to complete a cultural resources investigation for review and approval by the City that includes, at a minimum:
• An updated records search at the North Central Information Center; • An intensive cultural resources survey, including subsurface presence/absence studies as appropriate;
• Contact and coordination with the Native American Heritage Commission and interested and involved local tribes;
• A report disseminating the results of this research that evaluates the eligibility of recorded resources for inclusion in the National and California Registers; and, • Recommendations for additional cultural resources investigations necessary to mitigate adverse impacts to recorded and/or undiscovered archaeological resources.

Complete a cultural resources investigation. Full Specific Plan, apart from Area A and Windsor
Cove
Project applicant During plan submittal City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Additional cultural resources investigations may include testing and evaluation of archaeological resources, as well as data recovery efforts. If a significant unique archaeological resource is present that could be adversely impacted by a project, the project proponent shall:
a) In consultation with the lead agency and archaeologist, determine if preservation in place is feasible. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines section 15126.4(b)(3), this may be accomplished through planning construction to avoid the resource; incorporating the resource within open space; capping and covering the resource; or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement; or b) Design and implement an Archaeological Research Design and Treatment Plan (ARDTP). If avoidance is not feasible, the project proponent shall hire a Secretary of the Interior-qualified archaeological consultant who shall prepare a draft ARDTP that shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln for review and approval. The ARDTP shall identify how the proposed data recovery program would preserve the significant information the archaeological resource is expected to contain. Treatment of unique archaeological resources shall follow the applicable requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Treatment for most resources would consist of (but would not be not limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, site documentation, and historical research, with the aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of the significant resource to be impacted by the project. The ARDTP shall include provisions for analysis of data in a regional context, reporting of results within a timely manner and subject to review and comments by the appropriate Native American representative before being finalized, curation of artifacts and data at a local facility acceptable to the appropriate Native American representative, and dissemination of final confidential reports to the appropriate Native American representative, the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System, the City, and interested professionals.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1487

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-25 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.6-2(b):

Before the start of grading or excavation activities, construction personnel involved with earth-moving activities shall be informed of the possibility of encountering archaeological resources, the appearance and types of resources likely to be seen during construction activities, and the proper notification procedures to follow should archaeological resources be encountered. This worker training shall be prepared and presented by a qualified archaeologist.

If archaeological resources are discovered during earth-moving activities, the requirements of General Plan Policy OSC‐6.7 (Discovery of Archaeological/ Paleontological Resources) shall be followed, as described herein. In the event of accidental discovery during construction, all work must halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery if subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin are discovered during construction. A qualified professional archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeologist shall be retained to evaluate the significance of the find, and shall have the authority to modify the no-work radius as appropriate, using professional judgment. A Native American monitor, following the Guidelines for Monitors/Consultants of Native American Cultural, Religious, and Burial Sites established by the NAHC, will be required if the nature of the unanticipated discovery is prehistoric.

Work cannot continue within the no-work radius until the archaeologist conducts sufficient research and data collection to make a determination that the resource is either 1) not cultural in origin; or 2) not potentially significant or eligible for listing on the California or National Registers.

If a potentially eligible resource is encountered, then the lead agency shall require the project proponent to arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource, if feasible or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if eligible, potentially data recovery as mitigation. The determination shall be formally documented in writing and submitted to the lead agency as verification that the provisions in CEQA for managing unanticipated discoveries have been met. Curation of any identified resources would be determined through consultation between the archaeologist, project proponent, and lead agency during the course of analysis.

Inform construction personnel about the
possibility of archaeological resource
discovery during construction.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Before grading or
excavation
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.6-3: Ground-disturbing construction
associated with implementation of the
proposed project could result in
disturbance or destruction of a
paleontological resource.

3.6-3:

Before the start of grading or excavation activities, construction personnel involved with earth-moving activities shall be informed of the possibility of encountering fossils, the appearance and types of fossils likely to be seen during construction activities, and the proper notification procedures to follow should fossils be encountered. This worker training shall be prepared and presented by a qualified paleontologist.

Inform construction personnel about the
possibility of fossil discovery during
construction.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
Windsor Cove
Project applicant Before grading or
excavation
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
If paleontological resources are discovered during earth-moving activities the following requirements of General Plan Policy OSC‐6.7 (Discovery of Archaeological/Paleontological Resources) will be followed: the construction crew shall immediately cease work and the Planning Department shall be notified immediately if any paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are uncovered during construction. All construction must stop in within 100 feet of the find and a paleontologist shall be retained to evaluate the resource and prepare and implement a proposed mitigation plan, including curation, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines.

3.6-4: Ground-disturbing activities
associated with construction of the
proposed project could result in
damage to previously unidentified
human remains.

3.6-4:
a) Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b). See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).
b) In the event that evidence of human remains is discovered, the following requirements of General Plan Policy OSC‐6.10 (Discovery of Human Remains) shall be followed. Construction activities within any area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains shall be halted or diverted. In addition, the provisions of Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code (PRC), and Assembly Bill (AB) 2641 shall be implemented. Specifically, the discovery shall be reported to the County Coroner (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code) and reasonable protection measures be taken during construction to protect the discovery from disturbance (AB 2641). If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner will notify the NAHC which will then designates a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the project (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). The designated MLD then has 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains (AB 2641). If the landowner does not agree with Follow Lincoln General Plan Policy OSC6.10 in the event of discovery of human remains.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During construction Native American Heritage Commission, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1488

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-26 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (Section 5097.94 of the PRC). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not be further disturbed (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). The United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) Tribal Council shall be solicited their input as part of the mitigation process.

Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 1
The following language shall be noted on any project Improvement Plans involving the Village 7B project site, subject to review and approval by the City of Lincoln Community Development Department:

The project proponent or their construction contractor shall comply with the following measure to assist with identification of TCRs at the earliest possible time during projectrelated earthmoving activities associated with the Village 7B project site:
• Native American Tribes are experts in their Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) who have the statutory authority and expertise to identify sites or objects of cultural value to their Tribe and to recommend appropriate treatment and final disposition of such sites or objects.
• The project proponent shall contact the UAIC at least two weeks prior to project ground-disturbing activities to retain the services of a Tribal Monitor(s). The duration of the construction schedule and Tribal Monitoring shall be determined at this time. • A contracted Tribal Monitor(s) shall monitor the vegetation grubbing, stripping, grading, trenching, and other ground-disturbing activities on Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 021-350-046 within the Village 7B project site. All ground-disturbing activities in this area shall be subject to Tribal Monitoring unless otherwise determined unnecessary by the UAIC. Spot checking shall be permitted on the following APNs: 021-263-006, 021-263-014, 021-263-022, 021-263-023, 021-350- 006, 021-350-023, 021-350-027, 021-350-038, 021-350-039, and 021-350-040. • Tribal Monitors or Tribal Representatives shall have the authority to direct that work be temporarily paused, diverted, or slowed within 100 feet of the immediate impact area if sites or objects of potential significance are identified. The temporary pause/diversion shall be of an adequate duration for the Tribal Representative to examine the resource.

A) Appropriate treatment of TCRs may include but is not limited to:

B) Recordation of the resource(s)
C) Avoidance and preservation of the resource(s)
• Reburial of the resource(s) onsite in a designated area subject to no future disturbance. The location of the reburial shall be acceptable to the UAIC. • To track the implementation of this measure, the Tribal Monitor(s) shall document field-monitoring activities on a Tribal Monitor log.
• The Tribal Monitor(s) shall wear the appropriate safety equipment while on the construction site.
• The Tribal Monitor(s), in consultation with the UAIC THPO and the City, shall determine an end or reduction to the on-site monitoring if/when construction activities have a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. • In the event the Tribal Monitor(s) does not report to the job site at the scheduled time after receiving proper notice, construction activities may proceed without tribal monitoring. At no time, regardless of the presence or absence of a tribal monitor, shall suspected TCRs be mishandled or disrespected.
• The City shall assist with resolution of disagreements between the project proponent/contractor and the Tribe if such occurs on the project.

Comply with measures to assist with
identification and treatment of TCRs during
earthmoving activities.

Village 7B area Project applicant Prior to approval of
improvement plans and
during construction
activities.

City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Tribal Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 2 Consult with the UAIC if any suspected TRCs or resources of cultural significance to
Village 7B area Project Applicant Immediately, following the discovery of any suspected
TCRs or resources of
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1489

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-27 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party The following mitigation measure is intended to address the identification and treatment of unanticipated discoveries of potential tribal cultural resources (TCRs) or resources of cultural significance to UAIC during ground disturbing activities. • If any suspected TCRs or resources of cultural significance to UAIC, including but not limited to features, anthropogenic/cultural soils, cultural belongings or objects (artifacts), shell, bone, shaped stones or bone, or ash/charcoal deposits are discovered by any person during construction activities including ground disturbing activities, all work shall pause immediately within 100 feet of the find, or an agreed upon distance based on the project area and nature of the find. Work shall cease in and within the immediate vicinity of the find regardless of whether the construction is being actively monitored by a Tribal Monitor, cultural resources specialist, or professional archaeologist.
• A Tribal Representative and the City of Lincoln shall be immediately notified, and the Tribal Representative in coordination with the City of Lincoln shall determine if the find is a TCR (PRC §21074) and the Tribal Representative shall make recommendations for further evaluation and treatment as necessary. • Treatment and Documentation:

B. The construction contractor(s) shall provide secure, on-site storage for culturally sensitive soils or objects that are components of TCRs that are found or recovered during construction. Only Tribal Representatives shall have access to the storage. Storage size shall be determined by the nature of the TCR and can range from a small lock box to a conex box (shipping container). A secure (locked), fenced area can also provide adequate on-site storage if larger amounts of material must be stored.

C. The construction contractor(s) and City of Lincoln shall facilitate the respectful reburial of the culturally sensitive soils or objects. This includes providing a reburial location that is consistent with the Tribe’s preferences, excavation of the reburial location, and assisting with the reburial, upon request.

D. Any discoveries shall be documented on a Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 form within 2 weeks of the discovery and submitted to the appropriate CHRIS center in a timely manner.

E. Work at the TCR discovery location shall not resume until authorization is granted by the City of Lincoln in coordination with the culturally affiliated Tribe.

UAIC are discovered during construction
activities.
cultural significance to
UAIC during construction
activities. Placer County Coroner

3.6-5: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would result in significant
cumulative impacts on historic
architectural resources.

3.6-5:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-1.

3.6-6: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would not result in

3.6-6:

Implement Mitigation Measures 3.6-2(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measures 3.6-2(a) and

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures

3.6-2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures

3.6-2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures

3.6-2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures 3.6-
2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1490

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-28 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party significant cumulative impacts on
unique archaeological resources.

3.6-7: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would not result in
significant cumulative impacts on
paleontological resources.

3.6-7:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-3.

3.6-8: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would not result in
significant cumulative impacts on
human remains.

3.6-8:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b) and Mitigation Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b) and
Mitigation Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and
(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

3.7 Energy

3.7-1: Construction of the proposed
project would not use fuel and energy
in an unnecessary, wasteful, or
inefficient manner during project
construction.

3.7-1:

The applicant(s) shall implement the following mitigation measures for each phase of development in the time frames provided:
a) The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e., make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower or greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. If any new equipment is added after submission of the inventory, the prime contractor shall contact the District prior to the new equipment being utilized. At least three business days prior to the use of subject heavy-duty offroad equipment, the project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, name, and phone number of the property owner, project manager, and on-site foreman.

Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans, (whichever occurs first), the applicant(s) shall provide a written calculation to the District for approval demonstrating that the heavy-duty (> 50 horsepower) off-road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased and subcontractor vehicles, will meet Tier 4 emission standards or the equivalent Tier standards established by the State in place at the time of construction. If Tier 4 equipment is unavailable for any equipment type, the prime contractor shall notify the PCAPCD that Tier 3 off-road equipment will be utilized.
c) During construction, the contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., electricity) or clean fuel (e.g., propane, gasoline, biodiesel, and/or natural gas) generators rather than temporary diesel power generators, to the degree feasible. d) During construction, the contractor shall minimize idling time to a maximum of 5 minutes for all diesel-powered equipment.

Provide inventory of construction vehicles
and equipment and calculations, utilize
existing power sources and clean fuel to the
degree feasible, minimize idling time to five
minutes, provide sign indicating idle time
limit, and maintain all construction
equipment in working condition.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant During each corresponding phase of development
Placer County Air Pollution
District, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
e) Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas of the construction site to limit idling to a maximum of 5 minutes.
f) Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated

3.8 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity

3.8-2: The proposed project would
not result in substantial soil erosion
or the loss of topsoil.

3.8-2(a):

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1(a) and (b).
a) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City Public Works Department and CVRWQB, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) detailing measures to control soil erosion and waste discharges during construction. The SWPPP shall include an erosion control and restoration plan, a water quality monitoring plan, a hazardous materials management plan, and post-construction BMPs. The BMPs shall be maintained until all areas disturbed during maintenance have been adequately stabilized.

Prior to the commencement of any construction activities (as they are phased), including grading, the project applicant shall submit of a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1(a) and (b). See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1491

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-29 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party State Water Resources Control Board for coverage under the 2012-0006-DWQ Permit.
i. The specific BMPs that would be incorporated into the SWPPP shall be determined during the final stages of the proposed Project design. The SWPPP shall include specific practices to minimize the potential that pollutants will leave the site during construction. Such practices include establishing designated equipment staging areas, minimizing disturbance of soils and existing vegetation, protection of spoils and soil stockpile areas, and equipment exclusion zones prior to the commencement of any construction activity; designating equipment washout areas; and establishing proper vehicle fuel and maintenance practices. ii. The applicant shall require contractors using and/or storing hazardous materials, such as vehicle fuels and lubricants, to do so in designated staging areas located away from surface waters according to local, state, and federal regulations as applicable.
iii. All contractors conducting maintenance-related work shall be required to prepare and implement a SWPPP to control soil erosion and waste discharges of other maintenance-related contaminants. The general contractor and subcontractor(s) conducting the work shall be responsible for preparing or implementing the SWPPP, regularly inspecting measures, and maintaining the BMPs in good working order. Maintenance vehicles and equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and shall be properly maintained to prevent contamination of soil or water from external grease and oil or from leaking hydraulic fluid, fuel, oil, and grease. iv. Methods and materials used for herbicide and pesticide application shall be in accordance with label directions, DWR’s most current guidelines on herbicide and pesticide use, and with laws and regulations administered by the Department of Pesticide Regulation.
v. Prior to approval of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall cause the preparation of and implementation of a Spill Prevention and Control Plan (SPCP). The SPCP shall be accessible on site at all times prior to initiation of maintenance activities, and throughout the activities. The SPCP shall identify the spill control materials that must be fully stocked on site at all times and include a plan for the emergency cleanup of any spills of fuel or other materials that may be released. Maintenance Yard staff shall be provided the necessary information from the SPCP to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters prior to commencement of construction activities and provide all necessary protocols to contain any spill that might occur. Any such spills, and the cleanup efforts, shall be reported by the on site contractor in an incident report to Placer County Environmental Health as the Certified Unified Program Agency or as directed by Environmental Health.
vi. Any in-water work shall be conducted in accordance with requirements as contained in the Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404 permits, California Fish and Game Code section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, and any other applicable regulatory permits or agreements.
b) Prior to approval of final improvement plans, the project applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that meets all the requirements described below. i. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include the proposed water quality facilities and shall be prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.400 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. The Water Quality Management Plan shall be consistent with goals and standards established under federal and state non-point source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations, the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan. ii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a description of all nonstructural BMPs and include Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), or similar regulatory mechanism, to enforce implementation of non-structural BMPs.

Non-structural BMPs shall include, but not be limited to, “good housekeeping” practices for materials storage and waste management, storm drain system stenciling, landscape chemical use guidelines, and street sweeping.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1492

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-30 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party iii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities during project operation, which the City shall consider and implement. iv. All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual adopted by the City for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based postconstruction BMPs shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs and shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the Section 10, Drainage, of the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and the Placer County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s Stormwater Management Manual. All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the proposed project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs.
v. To comply with the requirements of the Placer County Mosquito and Vector Control District, all BMPs shall be designed to discharge all waters within 96 hours of the completion of runoff from a storm event. All graded areas must drain so that no standing water can accumulate for more than 96 hours within water quality facilities.
vi. Stormwater runoff from the proposed project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment, oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. Examples of these BMPs include, but are not limited to, grass strips, bioretention, bioswales, composite/treatment train BMPs, detention basins (surface/grass-lined), media filters (mostly sand filters), porous pavement, retention ponds (surface pond with a permanent pool), wetland basins (basins with open water surface), a combined category including both retention ponds and wetland basins, and wetland channels (swales and channels with wetland vegetation). The Water Quality Plan shall include plans for the maintenance of proposed BMPs. No water quality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.

3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

3.9-2: The proposed project could
create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into
the environment.

3.9-2:
a) Prior to final project design or if none is required, any earth-disturbing activities at the project site, the City shall require that the applicant conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) areas that are not already evaluated in an existing Phase I ESA. The Phase I ESA shall be prepared by a Registered Environmental Assessor (REA) or other qualified professional to assess the potential for contaminated soil or groundwater conditions at the project site. The Phase I ESA shall include a review of appropriate federal and State hazardous materials databases, as well as relevant local hazardous material site databases for hazardous waste on-site and off-site locations within a one-quarter mile radius of the area of analysis. The Phase I ESA shall also include a review of existing or past land uses and aerial photographs, summary of results of reconnaissance site visit(s), and review of other relevant existing information that could identify the potential existence of contaminated soil or groundwater. If no contaminated soil or groundwater is identified, or the Phase I ESA does not recommend any further investigation, then no further action is required.

Conduct a Phase I ESA for all other areas
not yet evaluated.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
b) If existing hazardous materials contamination is identified during the execution of Mitigation Measure 3.9-2(a), and the future Phase I ESA recommends further review, the applicant shall retain an REA to conduct follow-up sampling to characterize the contamination and to identify any required remediation that shall be conducted, consistent with applicable regulations prior to any earth-disturbing activities. The environmental professional shall prepare a report that includes, but is not limited to, activities performed for the assessment, a summary of anticipated contaminants and contaminant concentrations at the proposed construction site, and recommendations for appropriate handling of any contaminated materials during construction. These recommendations shall be implemented and the site shall be deemed remediated by the appropriate agency (e.g., DTSC, PCDEHS) or the County shall issue a No Conduct a follow-up study in the event that
further review is needed.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1493

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-31 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Further Action (NFA) letter prior to earth disturbance continuing in the vicinity of the contamination.
c) If unidentified or suspected contaminated soil or groundwater (stained soil, noxious odors) is encountered during site preparation or construction activities, work shall stop in the area of potential contamination, and the type and extent of contamination shall be identified by an REA or qualified professional. The REA or qualified professional shall prepare a report that includes, but is not limited to, activities performed for the assessment, summary of anticipated contaminants and contaminant concentrations, and recommendations for appropriate handling and disposal. Site preparation or construction activities shall not recommence within the contaminated areas until remediation is complete and a “no further action” letter is obtained from the applicable regulatory agency.

Stop work in the event hazardous materials
are found.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.9-4: The proposed project could be
located on a site which is included on
a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 (Cortese List)
and, as a result, create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment.

3.9-4(a):

During construction, the contractor shall cease any earthwork activities upon discovery of any suspect soils or groundwater (e.g., petroleum odor and/or discoloration) during construction in accordance with a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan prepared for the project by a qualified environmental consultant and approved by the Placer County Department of Environmental Health Services (PCDEHS). The contractor shall notify the PCDEHS upon discovery of suspect soils or groundwater and retain a qualified environmental firm to collect soil and/or groundwater samples to confirm the level of contamination that may be present. If contamination is found to be present, any further proposed groundbreaking activities within areas of identified or suspected contamination shall be conducted according to a site specific health and safety plan, prepared by a California state licensed professional. Any contaminants identified as exceeding human health risk levels, shall be delineated, removed, and disposed of offsite in compliance with the receiving facilities requirements under the direction of PCDEHS. The contractor shall follow all procedural direction given by PCDEHS and in accordance with the Soil and Groundwater Management Plan prepared for the site to ensure that suspect soils are isolated, protected from runoff, and disposed of in accordance with Section 31303 of the California Vehicle Code and the requirements of the licensed receiving facility.

Stop work in the event suspect soils or
groundwater is found.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.9-4(b):

Conduct a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment on the Morse Property at 200 South Dowd Road (APN 021-081-008) in order to sample the underlying soil beneath a concrete saddle that formerly supported an above ground diesel tank and the footprint of a former barn that included an above ground gasoline tank. Follow the recommendations in the Phase II ESA.

Conduct a Phase II ESA. Windsor Cove Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.9-6: The proposed project would
not result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the
project area for a project within the
vicinity of a private airstrip.

3.9-6:

Prior to issuance of the first building permit within 500 feet of the airstrip, the project applicant shall purchase and/or relocate the easement and upon purchase or relocation, abandon the airstrip by filing the appropriate documentation with the Placer County Recorder’s Office.

Purchase and/or relocate airstrip easement. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to building permit
issuance
Placer County Recorder’s
Office, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department

3.9-7: The proposed project could
impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency
evacuation plan.

3.9-7:

Prior to construction, the applicant for any phase of construction shall require the construction contractor(s) to prepare and enforce a traffic control plan to minimize traffic impacts on all roadways at and near the work site affected by construction activities. This traffic control plan shall reduce potential traffic safety hazards and ensure adequate access for emergency responders. The applicant and construction contractor(s) shall coordinate development and implementation of this traffic control plan with the City of Lincoln, as appropriate. To the extent applicable, this traffic control plan shall conform to the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Part 6 (Temporary Traffic Control). The traffic control plan shall provide, but not be limited to, the following elements:
• Circulation and detour plans to minimize impacts on local road circulation during road and lane closures. Flaggers and/or signage shall be used to guide vehicles through and/or around the construction zone.
• Identifying truck routes designated by Placer County, where applicable. Haul routes that minimize truck traffic on local roadways shall be utilized to the extent possible. • Sufficient staging areas for trucks accessing construction zones to minimize the disruption of access to adjacent existing public right-of-ways.

Prepare and enforce a traffic control plan. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1494

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-32 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party • Controlling and monitoring construction vehicle movement through the enforcement of standard construction specifications by onsite inspectors. • Scheduling truck trips outside the peak morning and evening commute hours to the extent possible.
• Limiting the duration of road and lane closures to the extent possible. • Storing all equipment and materials in designated contractor staging areas on or adjacent to the worksite, such that traffic obstruction is minimized. • Implementing roadside safety protocols. Advance “Road Work Ahead” warning and speed control signs (including those informing drivers of State legislated double fines for speed infractions in a construction zone) shall be posted to reduce speeds and provide safe traffic flow through the work zone.
• Coordinating construction administrators of police and fire stations (including all fire protection agencies). Operators shall be notified in advance of the timing, location, and duration of construction activities and the locations of detours and lane closures, where applicable.
• Repairing and restoring affected roadway rights-of way to their original condition after construction is completed.

3.9-14: The proposed project,
combined with other cumulative
development, could impair the
implementation of or physically
interference with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan.

3.9-14:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-7. See Mitigation Measure

3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-7.

3.10 Hydrology

3.10-1: Implementation of the
proposed project could violate water
quality standards or waste discharge
requirements.

3.10-1(a):

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan – Project Construction Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City Public Works Department and CVRWQCB, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) detailing measures to control soil erosion and waste discharges during construction. The SWPPP shall include an erosion control and restoration plan, a water quality monitoring plan, a hazardous materials management plan, and post-construction BMPs. The BMPs shall be maintained until all areas disturbed during maintenance have been adequately stabilized.

Prior to the commencement of any construction activities (as they are phased), including grading, the project applicant shall submit of a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Water Resources Control Board for coverage under the 2012-0006-DWQ Permit. i. The specific BMPs that would be incorporated into the SWPPP shall be determined during the final stages of the proposed Project design. The SWPPP shall include specific practices to minimize the potential that pollutants will leave the site during construction. Such practices include establishing designated equipment staging areas, minimizing disturbance of soils and existing vegetation, protection of spoils and soil stockpile areas, and equipment exclusion zones prior to the commencement of any construction activity; designating equipment washout areas; and establishing proper vehicle fuel and maintenance practices.
ii. The applicant shall require contractors using and/or storing hazardous materials, such as vehicle fuels and lubricants, to do so in designated staging areas located away from surface waters according to local, state, and federal regulations as applicable.
iii. All contractors conducting maintenance-related work shall be required to prepare and implement a SWPPP to control soil erosion and waste discharges of other maintenance-related contaminants. The general contractor and subcontractor(s) conducting the work shall be responsible for preparing or implementing the SWPPP, regularly inspecting measures, and maintaining the BMPs in good working order.

Maintenance vehicles and equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and shall be properly maintained to prevent contamination of soil or water from external grease and oil or from leaking hydraulic fluid, fuel, oil, and grease. iv. Methods and materials used for herbicide and pesticide application shall be in accordance with label directions, DWR’s most current guidelines on herbicide and Prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City Public
Works Department and the Central Valley,
and submit a Notice of Intent to the State
Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to grading permit
issuance for SWPPP, and
prior to phased construction
for NOI
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department and Central Valley
Regional Water Quality Control
Board (CVRWQCB) for
SWPPP and State Water
Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) for NOI
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1495

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-33 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party pesticide use, and with laws and regulations administered by the Department of Pesticide Regulation.
v. Prior to approval of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall cause the preparation of and implementation of a Spill Prevention and Control Plan (SPCP).

The SPCP shall be accessible on site at all times prior to initiation of maintenance activities, and throughout the activities. The SPCP shall identify the spill control materials that must be fully stocked on site at all times and include a plan for the emergency cleanup of any spills of fuel or other materials that may be released.

Maintenance Yard staff shall be provided the necessary information from the SPCP to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters prior to commencement of construction activities and provide all necessary protocols to contain any spill that might occur. Any such spills, and the cleanup efforts, shall be reported by the on site contractor in an incident report to Placer County Environmental Health as the Certified Unified Program Agency or as directed by Environmental Health. vi. Any in-water work shall be conducted in accordance with requirements as contained in the Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404 permits, California Fish and Game Code section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, and any other applicable regulatory permits or agreements.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1496

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-34 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.10-1(b):

Water Quality BMPs – Project Operation
Prior to approval of final improvement plans, the project applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that meets all the requirements described below. i. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include the proposed water quality facilities and shall be prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.400 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. The Water Quality Management Plan shall be consistent with goals and standards established under federal and state non-point source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations, the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan.
ii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a description of all non-structural BMPs and include Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), or similar regulatory mechanism, to enforce implementation of non-structural BMPs. Nonstructural BMPs shall include, but not be limited to, “good housekeeping” practices for materials storage and waste management, storm drain system stenciling, landscape chemical use guidelines, and street sweeping. iii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities during project operation, which the City shall consider and implement. iv. All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual adopted by the City for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based post-construction BMPs shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs and shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the Section 10, Drainage, of the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and the Placer County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s Stormwater Management Manual. All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the proposed project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs. v. To comply with the requirements of the Placer County Mosquito and Vector Control District, all BMPs shall be designed to discharge all waters within 96 hours of the completion of runoff from a storm event. All graded areas must drain so that no standing water can accumulate for more than 96 hours within water quality facilities. vi. Stormwater runoff from the proposed project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment, oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. Examples of these BMPs include, but are not limited to, grass strips, bioretention, bioswales, composite/treatment train BMPs, detention basins (surface/grass-lined), media filters (mostly sand filters), porous pavement, retention ponds (surface pond with a permanent pool), wetland basins (basins with open water surface), a combined category including both retention ponds and wetland basins, and wetland channels (swales and channels with wetland vegetation). The Water Quality Plan shall include plans for the maintenance of proposed BMPs. No water quality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.

Prepare a Water Quality Management Plan. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to final improvement
plan approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.10-3: Implementation of the
proposed project could substantially
alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result
in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site.

3.10-3:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1497

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-35 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.10-4: Implementation of the
proposed project would substantially
alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or
river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner which could result in flooding
on- or off-site.

3.10-4:

The project applicant(s) shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1and demonstrate that the final design of the onsite drainage improvements will comply with the requirements established in the V5 Drainage Master Plan.

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1 and
demonstrate that final design of the
drainage components will be compliant with
the Village 5 Drainage Master Plan.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

City of Lincoln Public Works
Department, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department

3.10-5: Implementation of the
proposed project could create or
contribute runoff water which would
provide substantial additional sources
of polluted runoff.

3.10-5:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

3.10-7: Implementation of the
proposed project could place within a
100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary, Flood Insurance Rate
Map, or other flood hazard
delineation map, or within a 200-year
floodplain, housing or structures
which would impede or redirect flood
flows.

3.10-7:

Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the City of Lincoln that it has received an encroachment permit from the Central Valley Flood Protection Board (CVFPB) for construction to be located within the 100-year and 200- year flood zone, and any other necessary state or federal permits. As part of the CVFPB permit process, the project applicant must demonstrate that the proposed improvements including storm drain outfalls and bridge supports will not result in an increase in water surface elevation consistent with CVFPB requirements as described in the California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Waters, Division 1, Central Valley Flood Protection Board, Article 8 Standards, including Sections 113 and 128, Bridges. Also, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall review plans for compliance with Chapter

15.32, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Lincoln Municipal Code and the City of Lincoln, Department of Public Works, Design Criteria and Procedures Manual, to confirm that proposed bridges, as designed, would not substantially impede or redirect flood flows.

The City Engineer shall confirm that any proposed bridge is constructed in accordance with the approved plans.

Demonstrate to the City that the applicant
has received a CVFPB encroachment
permit.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to grading permit
issuance
CVFPB, City of Lincoln Public
Works Department, City of
Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.10-8: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative violations of water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements by increasing runoff,
providing additional sources of
polluted runoff, or otherwise
degrading water quality.

3.10-8:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

3.10-10: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative substantial alteration of
the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result
in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site.

3.10-10:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

3.11 Land Use

3.11-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would conflict with
adjacent land uses.

3.11-1:

Where residential uses would be located adjacent to parcels where agricultural operations are permitted, including livestock grazing and/or confinement, the applicant shall provide to all homebuyers notice in a transfer deed regarding the Agricultural Overlay District and required buffers and/or setbacks, as well as agricultural operations and potential nuisance activities that could occur on lands adjacent to the homesite. The applicant shall provide the City with draft notice language to be included in each deed prior to pulling the first building permit.

Provide notice in a transfer deed regarding
the Agricultural Overlay District and required
buffers, setbacks, and potential agricultural
operations and nuisance activities that could
occur. Provide draft language for the City to
include within each deed.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to building permit
issuance
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1498

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-36 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.11-2: Implementation of the
proposed project would create
conflicting land uses within the Plan
Area.

3.11-2:
i) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.

During the design review process, the applicant shall adhere to the following measures to reduce impacts from light and glare:
a) All light standards shall be shielded and directed downward so that light shall not emit higher than a horizontal level.
b) Reflective surfaces of multi-story buildings facing streets, open spaces, parks, and residential neighborhoods shall be oriented to avoid generating glare that could create a nuisance or safety hazard.
c) For parks or other facilities anticipated to include nighttime activities, the site and placement of overhead lighting shall be designed to minimize exposure of adjacent properties to spillover light and minimize the amount of light that would be visible above the horizontal plane of the light fixture. d) Normal operating hours for lighting related to nighttime recreational activities shall be until 10:00 p.m. on Sunday through Thursday and on Friday and Saturday until 11:00 p.m. to reduce the disruption to adjacent properties. to reduce the disruption to adjacent properties. Special events that would require lighting beyond normal operating hours would be subject to a permit to be issued by the City.
ii) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.11-1. iii) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-6, which requires as follows:

Depending on the layout of the proposed loading docks, barriers that completely block line-of-sight between the loading docks and the nearest residential dwelling may not be feasible.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4. See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.
b) Limit heavy truck deliveries to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. unless a site-specific acoustical study prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director or Chief Building Official concludes that deliveries outside of this timeframe would not adversely affect sensitive receptors. c) The use of loudspeakers and similar devices used within parks shall be prohibited outside the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. d) Commercial loading docks located within 100 feet of existing or proposed residences shall be positioned in areas shielded from view of adjacent noisesensitive uses by intervening commercial buildings to the degree feasible. If required to reduce noise to acceptable levels, solid noise barriers shall be constructed at the boundary of commercial uses with loading docks and have a minimum height sufficient to intercept line-of-sight between heavy trucks and the affected area of the noise-sensitive uses.
e) Signs shall be posted prohibiting idling of delivery trucks to 5 minutes or less Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1499

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-37 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.12 Noise

3.12-1: Construction of the proposed
project could temporarily increase
ambient noise levels.

3.12-1:

The City shall ensure construction contractors for each project phase comply with the following mitigation measures:
a) Construction hours shall be limited to those allowed in the City’s Public Facilities Improvement Standards between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday If construction is necessary on Sunday and Holidays the applicant shall submit a written request to the Director of Public Works or City Engineer, as applicable, 72-hours prior to the desired construction. If work is allowed outside aforementioned work hours, the applicant shall have a copy of the written approval available at the work site.
b) All heavy construction equipment and all stationary noise sources (such as diesel generators) shall have manufacturer-installed mufflers. c) Equipment warm up areas, water tanks and equipment storage areas shall not be located closer than 200 feet from existing residences.
d) Applicant shall provide two weeks advanced notice to all residences located within 300 feet of construction activities, including the approximate start date and duration of such compaction activities.
e) Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for proposed project construction shall be hydraulically or electrically powered where available to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. Where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves shall be used where available; this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. f) Appropriately sized noise barriers or shielding shall be erected for construction work involving heavy duty construction equipment if occurring within 300 feet of receptors for an extended period of time (more than 2 weeks).

Abide by construction requirements per the
City
(Full Specific Plan and
Area A)
Construction contractors During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.12-2: Construction of the proposed
project would result in exposure of
persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels.

3.12-2:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

3.12-3: Implementation of the
proposed project would expose
noise-sensitive land uses to
transportation noise levels in excess
of the City of Lincoln General Plan
noise standard or result in a
substantial permanent increase in
ambient transportation-related noise
above existing levels.

3.12-3:

Prior to approval of the tentative subdivision map (TSM) for any residential uses located adjacent to Dowd Road (between Mavis Avenue and Nicolaus Road), Mavis Road (between Dowd Road and Nelson Lane), Old Nelson Lane (between Moore Road and SR 65) and SR 65 (between Wise Road and south of Nelson Lane), the TSM applicant shall submit to the City an acoustical study demonstrating that noise attenuation features included in the project would reduce outdoor and interior noise levels to less than the City’s 60 dBA Ldn and 45 dBA Ldn noise standards, respectively. The noise study shall identify the measures to be utilized and the noise attenuation attributable to each feature.

Noise attenuating features may include, but are not limited to:
a) Construct noise barriers (walls and/or berms), as appropriate on a site-specific basis, to reduce traffic noise levels at noise-sensitive land uses, which have been found to be significantly impacted by traffic noise. A concrete cinderblock noise barrier must completely block line-of-sight between the source and receptor, and can reduce traffic noise levels by at least 10 dB. Any noise walls shall be landscaped with vines (to be fully covered within three years) and shall be landscaped in accordance with the General Development Plan (GDP).
b) Design and construct residential buildings adjacent to Dowd Road (between Mavis Avenue and Nicolaus Road), Mavis Road (between Dowd Road and Nelson Lane), Old Nelson Lane (between Moore Road and SR 65) and SR 65 (between Wise Road and south of Nelson Lane) so that their external activity areas are not within line-ofsight of these roadways. This could result in noise reductions of at least 3 dB. c) Repaving impacted roadways with “quiet” pavement types such as rubberized concrete. Roadways constructed with rubberized concrete can resulted in a net decrease in traffic noise levels of approximately 4 dB compared to that created by conventional asphalt.

Submit an acoustical study demonstrating
that noise attenuation features included in
the project would reduce outdoor and
interior noise levels to less than the City’s
60 dBA Ldn and 45 dBA Ldn noise
standards, respectively
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to approval of the
tentative subdivision map
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1500

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-38 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party d) The applicant shall conduct an acoustical analysis to confirm that if the materials to be used for residential building construction would reduce interior noise levels to 45 dBA Ldn. If the analysis determines that additional noise insulation features are required, the acoustical analysis shall identify the type of noise insulation features that would be required to reduce the interior noise levels to 45 dBA Ldn, and the applicant shall incorporate these features into the building design.

3.12-4: The proposed project could
result in exposure of people residing
or working at the project site to
excessive noise levels from a project
located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a
public or public use airport.

3.12-4:

If a daycare center is located in Compatibility Zone C1, the applicant shall conduct an acoustical analysis to confirm that the materials to be used for construction of the commercial building housing the daycare center would result in an interior to exterior noise reduce of at least 20 dB. If the analysis determines that additional noise insulation features are required, the acoustical analysis shall identify the type of noise insulation features that would be require to result in an exterior to interior noise reduce of at least 20 dB, and the applicant shall incorporate these features into the building design.

Conduct an acoustical analysis in the event
that a daycare center is located in Lincoln
Regional Airport Compatibility Zone C1
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.12-5: Implementation of the
proposed project would expose
people residing or working in the
proposed project area to excessive
noise levels for a project within the
vicinity of a private airstrip.

3.12-5:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.9-6.

3.9-6
Prior to issuance of the first building permit within 500 feet of the airstrip, the project applicant shall purchase and/or relocate the easement and upon purchase or relocation, abandon the airstrip by filing the appropriate documentation with the Placer County Recorder’s Office.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-6. Full Specific Plan and
Area A
See Mitigation Measure

3.9-6.

See Mitigation Measure

3.9-6.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-6.

3.12-6: Implementation of the
proposed project would expose onsite noise-sensitive land uses to noise generated by commercial,
educational and recreational activities
in excess of the City of Lincoln
General Plan noise standard or result
in an increase in ambient noise

3.12-6:

During individual phase design preparation, the applicant shall implement the following measures to assure that interior and exterior noise levels from stationary sources are below the City’s standards of 60 dBA Ldn outdoor and 45 dBA Ldn indoor, respectively:
a) The proposed land uses shall be designed so that on-site mechanical equipment (e.g., HVAC units, compressors, generators) and area-source operations (e.g., loading docks, parking lots, and recreational-use areas) are located no closer than 120 feet from the nearest residential dwelling or provided shielding from nearby noise sensitive land uses to meet City noise standards. Shielding must have a minimum height sufficient to completely block line-of-sight between the on-site noise source and the nearest residential dwelling to meet the City noise standards. Based on the size and placement of the HVAC units (i.e., ground level or roof top), barrier heights may range between three to six feet. Depending on the layout of the proposed loading docks, barriers that completely block line-of-sight between the loading docks and the nearest residential dwelling may not be feasible. b) Limit heavy truck deliveries to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. unless a site-specific acoustical study prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director or Chief Building Official concludes that deliveries outside of this timeframe would not adversely affect sensitive receptors.
c) The use of loudspeakers and similar devices used within parks shall be prohibited outside the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday.
d) Commercial loading docks located within 100 feet of existing or proposed residences shall be positioned in areas shielded from view of adjacent noise-sensitive uses by intervening commercial buildings to the degree feasible. If required to reduce noise to acceptable levels, solid noise barriers shall be constructed at the boundary of commercial uses with loading docks and have a minimum height sufficient to intercept line-of-sight between heavy trucks and the affected area of the noisesensitive uses. e) Signs shall be posted prohibiting idling of delivery trucks to 5 minutes or less.

Implement the noise mitigation measures Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to individual phase
design implementation
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.12-7: Construction of the proposed
project, including other cumulative
growth, would temporarily add to
cumulative noise levels in the vicinity
of the proposed project site.

3.12-7:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1501

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-39 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.12-8: Construction of the proposed
project, combined with other
cumulative growth, would temporarily
add to cumulative groundborne
vibration levels in the vicinity of the
proposed project site.

3.12-8:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-2. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-2.

3.12-9: Increases in traffic from the
proposed project, in combination with
other development, could result in
cumulatively considerable noise
increases.

3.12-9:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-3.

3.14 Public Services

3.14-4: The proposed project could
result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered parks or
recreation facilities or the need for
new or physically altered parks or
recreation facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable performance
objectives for parks and recreation
services.

3.14-4:

If fewer than 38.7 acres of the Regional Sports Park are available for public use, the project applicant shall either (i) provide the required additional active recreational park land; or (ii) pay the In Lieu Fee for park and recreational facilities as set forth in Lincoln Municipal Code section 17.32.010 for the difference between the demand for active recreational park (116.7 acres) and the active recreational parkland provided.

Agree to build or pay In Lieu Fee to
compensate for required additional active
recreational park land.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to issuance of a
building permit
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.15 Transportation

3.15-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at intersections under
the City of Lincoln’s jurisdiction
operating at an acceptable LOS
under existing conditions.

3.15-1:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following improvements.

These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, PFE credits would be given to the constructing party. Alternatively, the City may require the project applicants to construct the improvements and provide them with a right of reimbursement from third parties who also benefit from the improvements. The development agreement between the City and project applicants shall specify the timing of the fair share payment or construction of these improvements, with the required timing prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study to be funded by the project applicants.

If, in the alternative to paying the applicable PFE fees, the project applicant(s) are required to construct improvements, the following improvements would be required to restore operations to an acceptable level at each intersection. a) Nelson Lane / Nicolaus Road (#10):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. To achieve LOS C operations, it may be necessary to provide protected left-turn movements and a right-turn overlap phase for eastbound right turn movements. Northbound U-turn movements would need to be prohibited to allow for the eastbound right-turn overlap phase. Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE. - Restripe the southbound approach to provide the following lane configurations:
i. One left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through-right turn lane - Reconfigure the south leg of the intersection to provide the following lane configurations:
i. Two northbound left turn pocket lanes
ii. One northbound through lane
iii. One northbound trap-right turn lane
iv. Two southbound receiving lanes
- Reconfigure the east leg of the intersection to provide a second westbound leftturn lane - Reconfigure the west leg of the intersection to include the following:

Pay fair share costs improvements outlined
included in the City of Lincoln Public
Facilities Element (PFE) fee program. Or,
the project applicant could construct the
requested improvements and, under the
City’s direction, be given a right of
reimbursement from third parties who
benefit from the said improvements.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1502

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-40 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party i. Restripe the eastbound shared through-right turn lane into a dedicated rightturn lane. This would result in one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one right-turn lane.
ii. Add a second westbound receiving lane
b) Airport Road / Nicolaus Road (#11):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. If necessary to achieve LOS C operations, provide protected phasing for left-turn movements. Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE.
- Widen the southbound approach to add a southbound left-turn pocket - Widen the south leg of the intersection to include the following:
i. One northbound left turn pocket lane
ii. One northbound through lane
iii. One northbound channelized free right turn lane
iv. Two southbound receiving lanes
- Widen the east leg of the intersection to include the following:
i. Two westbound left turn lanes (one trap lane; one pocket lane) ii. Restripe the existing westbound lane to a through-right lane iii. Two eastbound receiving lanes (one from the eastbound through lane and one from the northbound free right-turn lane)
- Widen the eastbound approach to include one left-turn pocket lane, one through lane, and one-right turn pocket lane.
c) Dowd Road / Nicolaus Road (#13):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. If necessary to achieve LOS C operations, provide protected phasing for left-turn movements. Signalizing this intersection is identified in the Village 5 Specific Plan, and is included in the updated PFE.
- Widen the southbound approach to add a southbound left-turn pocket - Widen the south leg of the intersection to include the following improvements:
i. One northbound left turn pocket lane
ii. One northbound through lane
iii. One northbound trap right turn lane
iv. Two southbound receiving lanes
- Widen the east leg of the intersection to include the following improvements:
i. Two westbound left turn lanes (one trap lane; one pocket lane) ii. Restripe the existing westbound lane to a through-right lane - Widen the eastbound approach to include one left-turn pocket lane, one shared through-right turn lane.
d) Fiddyment Road / Moore Road (#15):
- Widen the southbound approach to add a southbound right-turn pocket e) Dowd Road / Moore Road (#22):
- Change the traffic control to side-street stop control for Moore Road, and free movements on Dowd Road (existing configuration is free movements on Moore Road and side-street stop control for Dowd Road).
f) Lakeside Drive / Nicolaus Road (#32):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE.

Additional mitigation to reduce impacts of Mitigation Measures 3.15-1(b) and (c) to intersections #11 and #13.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1503

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-41 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Option 1:
g) The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the intersections of Airport Road/Nicolaus Road (#11) and Dowd Road/Nicolaus Road (#13). In addition to compliance with Mitigation Measures 3.15-1(b) and (c), the City shall cause one of the following measures to be taken prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study at each location to be funded by the project applicant(s):
i. The project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the City staff to ensure signal phasing times would allow adequate time for cyclists to cross through the widened intersections during green and amber signal phases; or ii. The project applicants’ intersection designs shall eliminate free right-turn movements in exchange for right-turn overlap phases or dual right turn lanes to serve high right-turn traffic volumes. Any dual right-turn lanes shall be designed to ensure adequate visibility of pedestrians, including any use of a channelized right-turn lane for the inside right-turn lane.

Option 2:
g) The project applicant(s) shall apply to the Community Development Director for a determination as to whether the recommended intersection widening conflicts with the City’s Policy T-2.3 and T-5.3 to achieve a traffic design to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The Community Development Director may determine that an exception to the LOS C standard in Policy T-2.3 is warranted.

3.15-3: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at future City of Lincoln
intersections in Village 5.

3.15-3:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the future Nelson Lane / Mavis Road intersection (#40) and shall cause the following improvements to be constructed prior to the service level degrading to LOS D:
• Southbound: channelize the right-turn lane and add a merge lane on westbound Mavis Road to allow “free” right-turn operations
• Eastbound: widen the eastbound approach to include a third left turn lane • Westbound: channelize the right-turn lane and add a merge lane on northbound Nelson Lane to allow “free” right-turn operations.

Monitor conditions at Nelson Lane/Mavis
Road intersection and construction
improvements.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to service level
reaching LOS D
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department
The development agreement between the City and project applicants shall specify the timing of the construction of these improvements, with the required timing prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study to be funded by the project applicants.

Additional mitigation to reduce impacts to Intersection #40 if widened:

Option 1:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the intersection of Nelson Lane/Mavis Road (#40). In addition to compliance with Mitigation Measures 3.15-3, the City shall cause one of the following measures to be taken prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study at each location to be funded by the project applicant(s):
a) The project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the City staff to ensure signal phasing times would allow adequate time for cyclists to cross through the widened intersections during green and amber signal phases; or
b) The project applicants’ intersection designs shall eliminate free right-turn movements in exchange for right-turn overlap phases or dual right turn lanes to serve high rightturn traffic volumes. Any dual right-turn lanes shall be designed to ensure adequate visibility of pedestrians, including any use of a channelized right-turn lane for the inside right-turn lane.

Option 2:

The project applicant(s) may apply to the Community Development Director for a determination as to whether the recommended intersection widening conflicts with the City’s Policy T-2.3 and T-5.3 to achieve a traffic design to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The Community Development Director may determine that an exception to the LOS C standard in Policy T-2.3 is warranted.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1504

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-42 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.15-4: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at intersections under
the County of Placer’s jurisdiction.

3.15-4:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to restore vehicle traffic operations to an acceptable LOS at each intersection.
a) Fiddyment Road / Athens Avenue (#16):
- Widening of the northbound approach to include a right-turn pocket lane - Widening of the southbound approach to include a left-turn pocket lane - Signalization at the intersection with a protected southbound left-turn movement.

There is no funding program in place for these improvements. Accordingly, the project applicant(s) shall obtain cost estimates for these improvements and determine its/their fair share payments. Once the fair share has been determined, the project applicant(s) shall pay that fair share to the City to ensure the payment goes to the above-referenced improvements.
b) Fiddyment Road / W. Sunset Boulevard (#18):
- Widening of the northbound approach to include a left-turn pocket lane - Signalization at the intersection with a protected northbound left-turn movement.

Pay fair share improvements for Fiddyment
Road/Athens Avenue and Fiddyment Road/
West Sunset Boulevard intersections.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
There is no funding program in place for these improvements. Accordingly, the project applicant(s) shall obtain cost estimates for these improvements and determine its/their fair share payments. Once the fair share has been determined, the project applicant(s) shall pay that fair share to the City to ensure the payment goes to the above-referenced improvements.

3.15-6: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at intersections
maintained by Caltrans.

3.15-6:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the construction of a new interchange at SR 65 / Nelson Lane (#3), as supported by Lincoln General Plan Policy T-2.9. The timing of these payments is outlined in the development agreement. As described in Section 3.15.2, the City of Lincoln is in the process of updating its PFE fee program. This interchange is included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, the project applicants shall pay their fair share towards these improvements through the City of Lincoln’s updated PFE fee program and ensure that they are constructed prior to the service level degrading to an unacceptable LOS F.

To initiate the Caltrans project development process towards implementing the new interchange, the project applicant shall fund the preparation of a Project Study Report – Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) document for a new interchange at SR 65/Nelson Lane (#3) in coordination with the City of Lincoln and Caltrans. The Caltrans project development process will determine the ultimate configuration of the new interchange and ensure that the ultimate configuration provides acceptable operations (i.e., LOS) based on Caltrans standards. Through the Caltrans project development process, the following intersection control options may be considered in accordance with Caltrans’ Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) policy:
• Unsignalized (side street stop controlled);
• Roundabout – Single or multi-lane;
• Diverging diamond interchange;
• Signalized spread diamond;
• Signalized single point urban interchange; or
• Signalized partial cloverleaf.

While the PSR-PDS process would determine the ultimate configuration of the interchange, the City and project applicant assumed a six-lane signalized partial cloverleaf interchange for this analysis based on the available footprint and the planned circulation network identified in the Village 5 Specific Plan. Since the six-lane partial cloverleaf provides the greatest capacity and has the largest footprint of the options listed above, it was determined that this configuration would verify whether an interchange would adequately mitigate the project’s impact on traffic operations (i.e., if a six-lane partial cloverleaf does not meet LOS standards, additional mitigation may be necessary).

Analysis presented in Table 3.15-23 shows that the six-lane signalized partial cloverleaf interchange provides acceptable operations with the following lane configurations at the interchange ramp terminal intersections:

Pay fair share improvements for SR 65/
Nelson Lane interchange.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1505

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-43 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party • SR 65 Northbound Ramps / Nelson Lane intersection:
i. Northbound SR 65 off-ramp: one left-turn lane, one shared left-right turn lane, and one right turn lane
ii. Northbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the northbound SR 65 loop on-ramp
iii. Southbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the northbound SR 65 slip on-ramp
• SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Nelson Lane intersection:
i. Southbound SR 65 off-ramp: one left-turn lane and one right-turn lane ii. Northbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the southbound SR 65 slip on-ramp
iii. Southbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the southbound SR 65 loop on-ramp

3.15-13: The proposed project could
result in temporary impacts to
transportation and traffic when
construction activity occurs within the
Village 5 Specific Plan site.

3.15-13:

Prior to the beginning of construction for each project phase, project applicants shall prepare a detailed Construction Traffic Management Plan subject to review and approval by the City Department of Public Works, in consultation with Caltrans, affected transit providers, and local emergency service providers. The Traffic Management Plan shall ensure that acceptable operating conditions are maintained on local roadways and freeway facilities. At a minimum, the plan shall include:
• The number of truck trips, time, and day of street closures • Time of day of arrival and departure of trucks
• Provision of a truck circulation pattern
• Identification of detour routes and signing plan for street closures, if necessary • Maintain safe and efficient access routes for emergency vehicles • Manual traffic control when necessary
• Proper advance warning and posted signage concerning street closures • Provisions for pedestrian and bicycle safety
A copy of the Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted to local emergency response agencies and transit providers, and these agencies shall be notified at least 30 days before the commencement of construction that would partially or fully obstruct roadways.

Prepare a detailed Construction Traffic
Management Plan.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction Caltrans, City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-14: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the City of
Lincoln’s jurisdiction operating at an
acceptable LOS under cumulative no
project conditions.

3.15-14:

Intersections 12, 14, 26, 32 and 33 have been incorporated into the City’s update PFE program for transportation. As a result, the project applicants may mitigate by either paying their fair share cost towards the following improvements, or in the alternative to paying fees, the City may require project applicant(s) to construct the improvements identified in below. The development agreement between the City and project applicants shall specify the timing of the fair share payment or construction of these improvements, with the required timing prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study to be funded by the project applicants:

In the alternative to paying fees, the project applicant(s) shall construct the following improvements to restore operations to an acceptable level at each intersection. a) Joiner Parkway / Nicolaus Road (#12):
- Restripe the northbound shared through-left turn lane to be a dedicated left-turn lane
- Restripe the southbound shared through-left turn lane to be a dedicated through lane
- Re-time the signal to provide protected northbound and southbound left-turn phasing.

Pay fair share fees or construct necessary
improvements for Intersections 12, 14, 26,
32, and 33.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
b) Old Nelson Lane / Moore Road (#14):
- Widen Moore Road to provide an eastbound left-turn pocket and a two-way leftturn lane to allow two-stage gap acceptance for southbound left-turn movements.

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1506

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-44 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party c) Joiner Parkway / Ferrari Ranch Road (#26):
- Widen the northbound Joiner Parkway approach to include a third left-turn lane - To provide space to receive the third northbound left-turn lane on westbound Ferrari Ranch Road, remove the channelized free right-turn lane from southbound Joiner Parkway
d) Lakeside Drive / Nicolaus Road (#32):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met, as stated in Mitigation

3.15-1(f). Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous City of Lincoln PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE. e) Teal Hollow Drive / Nicolaus Road (#33):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met.

Additional mitigation to reduce impacts to intersection #26 if widened:

Option 1:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the intersection of Joiner Parkway/Ferrari Ranch Road (#26). In addition to compliance with Mitigation Measures 3.15-14, the City shall cause one of the following measures to be taken prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study at each location to be funded by the project applicant(s):
f) The project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the City staff to ensure signal phasing times would allow adequate time for cyclists to cross through the widened intersections during green and amber signal phases; or
g) The project applicants’ intersection designs shall eliminate free right-turn movements in exchange for right-turn overlap phases or dual right turn lanes to serve high rightturn traffic volumes. Any dual right-turn lanes shall be designed to ensure adequate visibility of pedestrians, including any use of a channelized right-turn lane for the inside right-turn lane.

Option 2:
f) The project applicant(s) may apply to the Community Development Director for a determination as to whether the recommended intersection widening conflicts with the City’s Policy T-2.3 and T-5.3 to achieve a traffic design to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The Community Development Director may determine that an exception to the LOS C standard in Policy T-2.3 is warranted.

3.15-15: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the City of
Lincoln’s jurisdiction operating at an
unacceptable LOS under cumulative
no project conditions.

3.15-15:
a) For the cumulative impacts to Airport Road / Nicolaus Road (#11), the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(b) and (g). See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).
b) For the cumulative impacts to Fiddyment Road / Moore Road (#15), the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(d). See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).
c) For the cumulative impacts to Dowd Road / Moore Road (#22), the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(e). See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).
d) For the cumulative impacts to Caledon Circle / Ferrari Ranch Road (#25), the project applicant shall pay their fair share cost towards the following improvements. These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program:
- Provide an overlap phase on the northbound right-turn movement.

Pay fair share cost towards Intersection 25. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-16: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at future City
of Lincoln intersections in Village 5.

3.15-16:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the future Dowd Road / Mavis Road (#37) and Nelson Lane / Mavis Road (#40) intersections, and shall cause the following improvements to be constructed prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, subject to reimbursement to the constructing entity by those benefitting from the improvements:
a) Dowd Road / Mavis Road (#37):
- To reduce the average vehicle delay, the following improvements are necessary to provide LOS C operations at Dowd Road / Mavis Road:
i. Provide two southbound left-turn lanes
ii. Channelize the westbound right-turn lane and provide a receiving merge lane on northbound Dowd Road to allow free right-turn movements Monitor traffic conditions at Intersections 37
and 40, and subsequently cause
improvements to be constructed.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
Prior to LOS D at
Intersections 37 and 40
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1507

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-45 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party b) Nelson Lane / Mavis Road (#40):
- Implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-3.

3.15-17: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the County of
Placer’s jurisdiction

3.15-17:
a) For the intersection at Fiddyment Road / Athens Avenue (#16) and Fiddyment Road/ W. Sunset Boulevard (#18), the project applicants shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-4 and widening of Fiddyment Road consistent with Mitigation Measure

3.15-20.

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-4 for
Intersection #16.

See Implement Mitigation
Measure 3.15-4.

See Implement Mitigation
Measure 3.15-4.
b) For the intersection at Fiddyment Road / E. Catlett Road (#17), the project applicant shall pay their fair share costs towards the following improvements:
- Widening the northbound and southbound approaches to include two through lanes; this is consistent with Mitigation Measure 3.15-20(a). - Adding a northbound left-turn pocket.
- Signalizing the intersection with protected northbound left-turn phasing - Widening the eastbound approach to include a left-turn pocket and right-turn lane. Provide an overlap phase for the eastbound right-turn movement.

Pay fair share costs towards required
improvements for Intersection #17.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-18: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the City of
Roseville’s jurisdiction.

3.15-18:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at each of the following intersections:
a) Fiddyment Road / Blue Oaks Boulevard (#19):
- An overlap phase on the southbound right-turn movement. This improvement would mitigate the project’s incremental contribution to delay at this intersection. b) Fiddyment Road / Baseline Road (#21):
- An overlap phase on the southbound right-turn movement. This improvement would mitigate the project’s incremental contribution to delay at this intersection.

Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for Intersections #19 and 21.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-19: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections maintained by Caltrans.

3.15-19:
a) For SR 65 / Nelson Lane (#3a and #3b), implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-6. See Mitigation Measure

3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-6.
b) For SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Ferrari Ranch Road (#4):

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at SR 65 Southbound Ramps/ Ferrari Ranch Road. These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, the project applicant shall pay their fair share through the City of Lincoln’s updated PFE fee program:
- Widening the eastbound approach to include a dedicated right-turn lane; channelize the eastbound right-turn movement onto the southbound on-ramp to allow free right-turn movements.

Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for Intersection #4.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
c) SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Twelve Bridges Drive (#9):

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Twelve Bridges Drive. These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, the project applicant shall pay their fair share through the City of Lincoln’s updated PFE fee program:
- Restriping the northbound off-ramp converting the existing shared through-right turn lane to a shared through-left turn lane
Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for Intersection #9.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1508

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-46 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.15-20: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels on study
roadway segments in Placer County.

3.15-20:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost to the City for the following recommended improvements to restore vehicle traffic operations to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at each roadway segment.
a) Widening Fiddyment Road from Athens Avenue to Moore Road from a two-lane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided arterial.
b) Widening Fiddyment Road from Roseville City Limits to Athens Avenue from a twolane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided arterial. c) Widening Athens Road from Fiddyment Road to Foothills Boulevard from a two-lane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided arterial.

Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for widening at:
-Fiddyment Road from Athens Avenue to
Moore Road
- Athens Road from Fiddyment Road to
Foothills Boulevard
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-22: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels on study
freeway facilities maintained by
Caltrans as well as roadways in the
City of Rocklin.

3.15-22:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share of improvements for impacts to SR 65.

The fair share payment shall consist of the appropriate SPRTA Fees to help fund improvements to SR 65. A number of different improvements may be considered by Caltrans and the City of Lincoln to restore operations to acceptable levels at the impacted locations. Improvements to SR 65 could take the form of auxiliary lanes between interchanges, an additional general purpose or High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction of SR 65, ramp metering, additional deceleration/acceleration areas at affected ramps, increased parallel street capacity, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) solutions, and other options. This mitigation measure would require the project applicant(s) to pay their fair share of future improvements to SR 65. SPRTA funding for the SR 65 widening project is currently estimated to be $67 million of the estimated total cost of $95 million for the project.

Pay fair share costs to fund SPRTA Fees, in
order to help fund improvements to SR 65.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.16 Utilities and Infrastructure

3.16-2: Implementation of the
proposed project would result in an
increased demand for water supply
that could result in the need for new
or expanded treatment, storage or
conveyance facilities.

3.16-2:

Prior to the approval of the Ophir WTP or Foothill Phase II WTP connection to the City’s water system or demand of 1.7 gpm within the Plan Area, whichever occurs first, the City shall ensure the following improvements or equally effective improvements for treatment and distribution have been completed and are operational:
a) The Ophir Water Treatment Plant is completed and operational at 10 mgd. b) The Village 7 18-inch transmission main is installed and connected to a third POC provided in the Plan Area.

Ensure the following improvements or
equally effective improvements for
treatment and distribution have been
completed and are operational for Ophir
Water Treatment Plant and the Village 7
18-inch transmission main connection to the
Village 5 Plan Area.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to approval of the Ophir WTP or Foothill
Phase II WTP connection to
the City’s water system or
demand of 1.7 gpm within
the Plan Area, whichever
occurs first
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department

3.16-7: The proposed project would
contribute to cumulative increases in
demand for water supply that could
result in the need for new or
expanded treatment, storage or
conveyance facilities.

3.16-7:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure 3.16-2(a). See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

Attachment 7 Exhibit A
1509
Resolution No. 2026-

Page 1 of 4 ends

Lincoln City CouncilJuly 28, 2026

Lincoln City Council
July 28, 2026