Lincoln City Council
July 28, 2026

RESOLUTION 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LINCOLN APPROVING THE SMALL LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE WINDSOR COVE PROJECT (ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 021-490-002-000) (APPLICANT: RON SMITH / PROPERTY OWNER: KUHN KIDS

INVESTMENT LLC)
WHEREAS, Title 17, Chapter 17.04 et seq. of the Lincoln Municipal Code provides for the review and recommendations of the City Council on all Tentative Maps; and WHEREAS, on June 17, 2026, the Planning Commission reviewed and considered Windsor Cove the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, and recommended approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, notices describing the proposed Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project were sent to neighboring property owners pursuant to the Lincoln Municipal Code Section 17.16.150 and notice of the hearing was published in accordance with Section 6061 of the Government Code in at least one newspaper of general circulation within the City of Lincoln at least ten calendar days before the City Council’s public hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Environmental Guidelines of the City of Lincoln, notice is hereby given that the City of Lincoln located at 600 Sixth Street, Lincoln, California has determined that the project is exempt under CEQA Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified. The proposed project qualifies for this exemption as it is consistent with the certified Village 5 Specific Plan EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2014052071) and applicable mitigation measures of the Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Plan. Therefore, no further environmental analysis is required; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposed Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project and conducted a public hearing.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. This Resolution incorporates, and by this reference makes a part hereof, that certain Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director, relative to the proposed development of the Windsor Cove Project on certain real property consisting of 90 acres located in Village 5 (APN 021-490-002-000), which is part of the Village 5 Specific Plan area and within the incorporated area of the City of Lincoln.
525
Resolution No. 2026-

Section 2. Pursuant to Section 66474 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council hereby finds and determines as follows:
a. The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project is consistent with the Lincoln General Plan and the Village 5 Specific Plan because the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map provides for the subdivision of the plan area in preparation of development in accordance with the General Plan land use designations. Consistent with the General Plan Land Use Element and the Village 5 Specific Plan, the specific lots are identified for Village Rural Residential (VRR) and Village Low Density Residential (VLDR) that will help meet the City's housing needs for projected future growth. This planned development will be supported by adequate public services and utilities.
b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision of the Windsor Cove Project is consistent with the General Plan and Village 5 Specific Plan because adequate infrastructure and services will be extended to the property and available to serve the demand for services generated by the residential development, including water, sanitary sewer, storm drain facilities, dry utilities and roadways. The Developer will work with the Police Department to ensure adequate security measures are incorporated into the Project. The Developer will install fire protection measures and emergency access in accordance with the City's standards. c. The site is physically suitable for the types of development proposed for the Windsor Cove Project because the proposed lot configuration is designed to avoid sensitive vegetation and wildlife resources. An erosion control plan, a complete drainage system plan, and a water quality control plan shall be prepared and incorporate National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") requirements to protect water quality. The proposed subdivision will include adequately sized and properly aligned culverts at all drainage crossings in accordance with City standards to prevent blockage of high flows and associated erosion. Each phase of project construction will address 100-year and 200-year flood conditions as appropriate. With respect to sensitive vegetation and wildlife resources, extensive open space and habitat areas are included in the Project and will be preserved and maintained to avoid or mitigate impacts to such resources.
d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development as discussed in Finding c. above.
e. Pursuant to the requirements of the Central Valley Flood Protection Act of 2008, the City Council finds that the property is located within a watershed with a contributing area of 10 or fewer square miles, as determined by the City.
f. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife 526
Resolution No. 2026-

or their habitat because potential Windsor Cove Project impacts related to the environment will be mitigated to less-than-significant levels, where feasible, in addition to other specific measures set forth above in Finding c.
g. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems since water, sewer, police, fire and solid waste services will be adequately provided to the development.
h. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through our use of property within the proposed subdivision. Adequate open space is located immediately adjacent to the residential development and will be accessible to the public.
i. The Windsor Cove Project area is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965.

Section 3. The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project is subject to the conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference.

These conditions support the findings made by this City Council set forth herein.

Section 4. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, and evidence in the Staff Report, the City Council hereby approves the Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map for the Windsor Cove Project, attached hereto as Exhibit C, substantially in the form on file with the Community Development Director, subject to the attached exhibits.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Councilmembers:

NOES: Councilmembers:

ABSENT: Councilmembers:

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
___________________________
Richard Pearl, Mayor
ATTEST:

Hope Ithurburn, City Clerk
527
Resolution No. 2026-

Exhibits:

A. Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval B. Village 5 Mitigation Monitoring Plan
C. Windsor Cove Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Plan Set (Sheets 1 through 4), dated June 19, 2026
528
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1
The Windsor Cove Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (approx. 90 Acres) is located within Village 5 Specific Plan Area, north east of the intersection of Fiddyment Road and Moore Road within the City of Lincoln, Assessor’s Parcel Number 021-490-002, is approved subject to the following conditions of approval:
* (Single Asterisk) located in front of the Condition is a Modified Standard Condition ** (Double Asterisk) located in front indicates a New Condition Specific to the Windsor Cove Tentative Subdivision Map Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. All development within the Windsor Cove subdivision is subject to compliance with Mitigation Measures contained within Village 5 Specific Plan EIR and Final Supplemental EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2014052071).

General
Condition
Community
Development

2. The Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its Council Members, its Planning Commission, officers, agents, employees, and representatives from liability for any award, damages, costs and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to any plaintiff in an action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation related to approval of this permit. Applicant further agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such action.

General
Condition
Community
Development

3. The Applicant shall pay the City’s actual costs of providing entitlement processing Plan review, Final Map review, GIS, administrative fee, and inspection services. This may be a combination of staff costs and direct billing for contract professional services.

General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
529
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

4. The ability to proceed under any approvals, entitlements, or authorizations granted by this action are contingent upon a Development Agreement being executed with the City of Lincoln, as per requirements of the approved Village 5 Specific Plan, and the Infrastructure & Public Facilities Financing Plan, which incorporates changes associated with this tentative map for the Applicant. Such Development Agreement shall be executed prior to City Council approval of any Final Map and may establish obligations to be completed prior to approval of any Final Map.

General
Condition/
prior to Final
Map approval
City of Lincoln

5. All improvements required for the Windsor Cove Tentative Subdivision Map shall be designed and constructed to conform to the City of Lincoln Municipal Code, Section 17, Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and Public Facilities Improvement Standards or as modified by these Conditions of Approval, or as approved by the City Engineer and/or Community Development Director.

Improvement
Plans/Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

6. *Design and construction or bonding of frontage improvements as per approved Subdivision Tentative Map are required prior to approval of the Windsor Cove Final Subdivision Map.

Prior to Final
Map Approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

7. **This subdivision includes private streets which are proposed to be gated off of Moore Road (Future Ferrari Ranch Road). The private streets shall be owned and maintained by a Home Owners’ Association, including maintenance of curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, street lighting, storm drainage, open space parcels with stormwater quality facilities, parks (if not open to the public), landscaping, fences and walls.

Within the private streets, the sewer and water mains shall be owned and maintained by the City of Lincoln. Public trails shall be maintained by the City of Lincoln. Along the project frontage, Moore Road shall be widened and repaired to be designated as a future arterial street.

General
Condition
Community
Development
and
Engineering
Attachment 10
530
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

8. As set forth in the City’s Public Facilities Element Fee (PFE program), the project is subject to Infrastructure and Capital Facility Impact Fees categories including but not limited to, Wastewater Fee; Reclaimed or Raw Water Fee; Drainage Fee; Water Fee; Transportation Fee; and Community Services Fees which includes Parks, City Administration, Fire, Police, Solid Waste, and Library. Project will not be subject to park fees if project park construction satisfies Village 5 park requirement.

General
Condition
Support
Services

9. * The Windsor Cove Tentative Subdivision Map shall be subject to those provisions set forth in the approved Village 5 Specific Plan & Infrastructure Financing Plan (adopted by Resolution No.2017-260, dated December 12, 2017, any subsequent amendments and General Development Plan for the Village 5 Plan Area (adopted by Ordinance No. 960B and as may be subsequently amended.

General
Condition
Community
Development

10. *The conditions of approval for the Small Lot Tentative Map and exhibit Maps dated May 12, 2026 supersede any and all conflicting notations and information which may be shown on said Maps.

General
Condition
Community
Development

11. The Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map approval is valid for four (4) years from the date of City Council approval, unless an extension of time is subsequently approved per Government Code Section 66452.6(e), or extended by the terms of a Development Agreement.

General
Condition
City of Lincoln

12. * All improvements and construction within the project shall be consistent with the latest Village 5 Specific Plan Amendment, General Development Plan Amendment, Development Agreement, and this Tentative Subdivision Map. The Tentative Map is the final approval that controls if they are any conflicting designs.

General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

13. *One or more residential small lot final map may be filed. Phasing of the final maps will be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.

General
Condition
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
531
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1
Condition Timing Responsible
Party Status

14. ** All infrastructure phasing must be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. a. If not already constructed by others, the initial phase of development must include the design and construction of the onsite & offsite backbone water system with 2 points of connection to the proposed residential development to the main line in Moore Road, such that no more than 20 lots will be without water if a single water valve is closed. The dedication of the easements, securities, and improvement agreements for this infrastructure are required prior to the first final map. A three-way valve package will be required at the well connection.
b. If not already constructed by others, the initial phase of development must design and construct all necessary sewer backbone infrastructure required to serve the development as per approved tentative subdivision map and consistent with the approved Village 5 Specific Plan. Development shall be eligible for reimbursement of the portion of backbone infrastructure being upsized for the benefit of future users consistent with the adopted Village 5 Infrastructure Finance Plan and the Citywide PFE policy. c. If not constructed by others, offsite sewer infrastructure (gravity or project lift station with force main alternative) shall be required to the satisfaction of the City engineer including all necessary road repairs required for the offsite sewer infrastructure.
a. Prior to
approval of
Final Map or
prior to
Building
Permit.
b. Prior to
approval of
Final Map
c. Prior to
improvement
plan and/or
small lot final
map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
532
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

DEVELOPMENT STUDIES/MITIGATION

15. * The design of on-site and backbone water system improvements shall comply with the approved Water Study to be funded by the Applicant consistent with the Backbone Water System of the adopted Village 5 Specific Plan, and Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan. Refer to infrastructure phasing requirements under COA#14.

Prior to
Improvement
Plan Approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

16. * The design of sanitary sewer system improvements shall be as per the Windsor Cove Sewer Study prepared by Frayji Design Group, dated Jan 5, 2026, and consistent with the approved Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan to ensure onsite and backbone sewer system is sized adequately to accommodate offsite sheds.

Initial
Submittal of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

17. ** The design of the on-site storm drainage system improvements shall comply with the Windsor Cove Preliminary Drainage Report prepared by Frayji Design Group, dated Jan 5, 2026. In addition, the applicant shall update this drainage report to demonstrate norise in HGL prior to plan approval with no residential lots encroaching within the 100-yr regulatory flood plain. Prior to the approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall also demonstrate that the design of the on-site drainage system complies with Section 10 of the City Design Criteria and Procedures Manual, specifically Table 10-1, “Allowable Street Encroachments” and Section 10-2 for minimum pad elevations adjacent to designated floodplains and overland routing of flood flows.

Initial
Submittal of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

18. The Applicant shall finalize the preliminary Storm Water Quality Plan with the 1st submittal of the improvement plans. This plan shall incorporate previous comments obtained during entitlement review to comply with the West Placer Storm Water Quality Design Manual, using updated SWQP templates, and the State MS4 permit or current State requirements. Compliance with the MS4 permit may result in the loss of lots.

Initial
Submittal of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
533
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

19. The Applicant shall submit a soils report amendment, if required, prepared by a soil engineer for the development including the recreational facility and/or park site. The report shall identify any grading and/or foundation soil problems on the lots and recommend any necessary corrective action to be taken. The reports shall be submitted with the Grading Permit or Improvement Plans, whichever occurs first. The reports shall include sub-grade soil evaluation for roadway design and provide suggested structural road sections. The soils report shall provide soil characteristics and geologic information necessary for input into the SWQP templates if required by design criteria.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

20. For those improvements that affect regulated resources, the Applicant shall have secured all required Environmental and Mitigation Permits for improvements prior to City approval of Plans for the improvements affecting the regulated resources.

Prior to
approval of
offsite
Improvement
Plans that
affect
regulated
resources.

Planning

STORM WATER QUALITY/GRADING/DRAINAGE

21. *The project with each phase shall include adequately sized and properly aligned culverts at all drainage-way crossings. Culvert sizes must meet the design requirements and be approved by the City Engineer. Design and construct temporary culverts over natural channels for any stream crossings used during the construction phase.

Construction equipment and vehicles must not cross streams without a proper temporary culvert crossing, unless the wetland permit includes filling the streams without a culvert requirement.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
City Engineer

22. In accordance with the City’s most current standards, no disturbed surface or soil shall be left standing through a winter season without erosion control measures, such as revegetation of exposed slopes. Temporary erosion control measures (such as silt fences, staked straw bales, etc.) shall be employed at the base of disturbed slopes until revegetation is established.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
City Engineer
Attachment 10
534
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

23. Design and construct energy dissipaters where drainage outlets discharge on erodible soil or into natural drainage ways. Temporary dissipaters may be used for temporary storm runoff outlets during construction phases. Permanent dissipaters shall be included for permanent outlets, unless the Erosion Control Plan indicates that conditions render it unnecessary (subject to the approval of the City Engineer).

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

24. The Applicant shall submit a post construction Storm Water Quality Plan with the improvement plans. The project shall comply with the City Ordinance, California MS4 permit requirements or any other State mandated requirements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Compliance with the MS4 permit may result in the loss of lots.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

25. The design, maintenance, inspection, and reporting of all storm water systems, devices, and treatment systems by the Applicant shall be in compliance with the State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order No. 2013-0001-DWQ National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Phase 2 Municipal General Permit No. CAS000004, Waste Discharge Requirements for Storm Water Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems and any design guidance developed by the City.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and
During
Construction
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

26. The Applicant shall submit a SWPPP and post construction Erosion Control Plan for each phase of construction for City approval. The Plan shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize and control the level of pollutants in storm water runoff released to off-site receiving waters. Specific techniques shall comply with adopted City Standards.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and
During
Construction
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

27. a. The applicant shall provide maintenance of the storm water quality facilities (including but not limited to bioretention ponds). The maintenance shall include but not be limited to the discharge piping and appurtenances to the public storm drain system, protective metal fencing (if required), planting of the biomaterials, and grading. b. The storm water quality ponds shall be located on lots which shall be owned and maintained by the Home Owners’ Association.
a. Prior to
acceptance of
Improvements
b. Prior to Final
Map Approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
535
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

28. The Applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan for storm water quality & LID improvement facilities to be maintained by the Home Owner Association (HOA). The Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan shall contain, at a minimum but not limited to, a description of the constructed facilities, the design criteria, a description of the expected facility operation, a post construction Erosion Control Plan, a post construction Storm Water Quality Control Plan, and a description of maintenance activities required along with a schedule for each activity. The Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan shall also contain a description of sampling, testing, and reporting requirements. The Water Quality Maintenance and Operation Plan shall be subject to approval by the Public Services Department.

Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer,
and Public
Services

29. Subject to permits issued by the Placer County Environmental Health Department, locate and properly abandon all septic systems and wells. Prior to abandoning any existing agricultural wells, the Applicant shall use water from the agricultural wells for grading and construction of the project or its phases.

Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
or as
determined on
Improvement
Plans
City Engineer

30. The Applicant shall submit Blasting Plans (if required) for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to commencing any on-site blasting activities. At a minimum, the Blasting Plan is to include a description of the work to be accomplished, a statement of the necessity to accomplish the work, a description of alternatives to blasting considered but rejected, a description of steps taken to avoid hard rock areas, safety measures to be implemented. The Blasting Plan is to coordinate blasting activities with the Police, Community Development Department, and Fire Departments and specify the time and duration proposed for the activity. The Applicant shall provide 72 hours notification to the above Departments of any scheduled blasting.

Prior to any
blasting
activities
Community
Development,
City Engineer,
Police, Fire

31. The Applicant shall provide a grading and erosion control security deposit in accordance with the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual.

Prior to the
issuance of the
Grading
Permit.

City Engineer
Attachment 10
536
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

32. Flagging, fencing, signage, and other devices shall be installed prior to grading on-site.

Fence locations shall be to the approval of the City Engineer and shall require inspection prior to start of grading. Fencing should not be removed unless written approval is obtained from the City Engineer.

Prior to
Grading
City Engineer

33. Trees removed during site grading and construction shall be disposed of by means other than landfill or burning.

Prior to
Grading
City Engineer

34. Trees not scheduled for removal adjacent to construction areas shall be temporarily fenced around their drip lines to prevent inadvertent damage during construction activity.

Prior to
Grading
City Engineer

FLOODPLAIN/WETLANDS

35. ** The applicant shall update the preliminary drainage report to demonstrate no-rise in HGL prior to plan approval with no residential lots encroaching within the 100-yr regulatory flood plain. All future grading shown on the tentative map, including proposed pad elevations, shall be subject to further review and approval by the City Engineer and Community Development Department in accordance with applicable City and FEMA requirements.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

TRANSPORTATION/STREET IMPROVEMENTS

36. *The configuration, location and timing of street improvements shall be as set forth in the approved tentative map, consistent with the Windsor Cove Development Agreement, Village 5 Specific Plan and General Development Plan, and Village 5 Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

37. **Moore Road shall be reconstructed and widened to 4 lanes as shown on the approved small lot tentative subdivision map along the project frontage with appropriate lane transitions along the eastern project limits.

Prior to
acceptance of
improvements
by the city
engineer
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
537
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

38. Traffic striping, markings and signing shall be provided as required by the applicable City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and Public Facilities Improvement Standards, as well as the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, latest edition.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

39. The Applicant shall design ADA compliant ramps to allow movement of bicycles from sidewalks to on-street bike lanes where bike/trail routes merge with frontage sidewalks. (Village 5 Specific Plan requires shoulder and ditch – no sidewalk – along existing Wastewater Treatment Facility along Moore Road.) Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

40. Street names shall be reviewed and approved by the City. The applicant shall work with the City to determine appropriate names to be incorporated into street names as feasible.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Planning

41. Applicant would provide an executed right of entry/construction easement from neighboring property owners prior to issuance of the grading permit along the eastern subdivision boundary if required.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

UTILITIES

42. The Preliminary Utility Plan exhibits in the Tentative Map set showing pipe sizing and alignment for utilities are not approved for final design. The utility exhibits shall be updated by technical studies/reports and the Improvement Plans shall incorporate the findings of the technical studies, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

43. **Applicant understands that the tentative map approval relies on downstream wet utility infrastructure being built by others as proposed on the approved tentative map, and this infrastructure will be required to be installed in order to serve Windsor Cove Subdivision consistent with the approved tentative map and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
538
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

44. Upon completion of the fire flow modelling, if determined necessary by the City Engineer, the Applicant shall design and construct water sampling stations at locations approved by the City Engineer to allow for sampling of the water supply system, pursuant to the State of California and the City of Lincoln, if significant changes are to be proposed from the approved Tentative Map.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer
and Public
Services

45. The Applicant shall pay for the cost of the City’s consultant to perform water modeling to access the Fire Flows by including this Project water system into the City’s water model.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

46. The Applicant shall comply with all provisions of the City’s Cross Control and Backflow Prevention Ordinance.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

47. The Applicant shall submit Joint Utility Trench Composite Plans for review by City Engineer.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

48. If/where applicable, subject to the Windsor Cove Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map, sewer and water easements located in open space areas shall have an access road to valves and manholes approved by the Community Development Department and City Engineer, and constructed with a minimum easement width of 15-feet and providing an 8-foot wide pave section, acceptable to the City Engineer with 2-foot wide aggregate base shoulders.

Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer
Attachment 10
539
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1
FIRE

49. The final design, layout and line capacity of water and hydrant systems will be subject to approval of the City Engineer in consultation with the Fire Chief prior to start of any phase of underground utility construction.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

50. The final placement of fire hydrants shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Chief during the review of Improvement Plans and consistent with the most current improvement standards for the City.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer
and Fire
Department

51. Emergency access ways and pedestrian connections will be consistent with the locations provided in the approved Tentative Map. Any changes made shall be reviewed with Improvement Plans and be approved by the Fire Department, Community Development Department, and City Engineer.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Community
Development,
City Engineer
and Fire
Department

52. ** The gates and controls to the gates at all entries/exits to the subdivision shall be designed in compliance with requirements of the City Fire Department. Gated communities to have “Click 2 Enter” and Opticom system programmed for fleet, police, fire channels.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans & Final
Map
Community
Development,
City Engineer
and Fire
Department
Attachment 10
540
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

PARKS AND TRAILS

53. The Applicant shall prepare Improvement Plans and construct the dedicated landscape corridors, trails, parks and other open space facilities, consistent with approved Windsor Cove Tentative Subdivision Map, Village 5 Specific Plan and the General Development Plan. Trail plans shall be approved with the Public Improvement Plans.

Landscape and Park plans will be submitted prior to Improvement plan approval, and reviewed separately from Improvement Plans.

The following specifications shall be applied to trails in the project:
• Trails must be located as shown on the approved Tentative Map. • Provide a striped pedestrian crossing for the trail system when it crosses a public right-of-way.
• Applicant shall install all required signage for the trail.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and final
Map.

Community
Development
and City
Engineer

54. The Applicant shall design and construct open fencing along all open space, drainage corridors, and parkways consistent with the General Development Plan, constructed in accordance with Plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer or designed and constructed as identified in the Army Corps of Engineers approved Open Space Management Plan.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map.

Community
Development
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
541
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

LANDSCAPING

55. *As specified in the Village 5 Specific Plan and Infrastructure and Public Facilities Financing Plan, Windsor Cove Landscape Plans shall include drought tolerant, low maintenance re-vegetation and landscaping plans and specifications for landscaped corridors/landscaped medians, common parking lots, prepared by a registered landscape architect. The Plans shall to be the satisfaction of the Community Development Department, City Engineer and the Public Services Director. The Plans shall be consistent with the General Development Plan and should blend the project into its natural environment and reflect a design which is sensitive to water use, fire hazards, wildlife and view sheds. The Plans shall include but not be limited to: planting plans, species lists suited to Lincoln’s climate and soil conditions, Irrigation Plans and water usage calculations consistent with AB 1881 regarding water conservation, backflow devices for potable water uses, stabilization measures for cut and fill slopes and soil preparation methods.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
Community
Development,
City Engineer,
and Public
Services

56. The Applicant shall be required to use the previously approved Master Tree List Planting Plan for the residential development setting front yard trees in accordance with the adopted General Development Plan for Village 5 Plan Area. The residential Landscape Plans shall be subject to review and approval of the Community Development Department
Prior to Final
Map Approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

57. Any structure as part of the civil and landscape improvement plans shall be submitted with civil Improvement Plans for review.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

58. **Installation of landscaping along New Nelson Lane may be deferred until the New Nelson roadway is constructed. Applicant shall submit a security instrument acceptable to the City attorney to include a provision of an annual cost escalation based on the Construction Cost Index (CCI) increase, to be held with the City until construction occurs. CCI increases will take effect annually on July 1st. (Sidewalk is part of the roadway improvements, by others.)
Prior to Final
Map Approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
542
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

LIGHTING/DESIGN

59. *A Street Lighting Plan shall be submitted to the City with Improvement Plans prior to construction of each project phase. All public street lights shall be LED and unmetered to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Street light poles where located in public rightof-way and maintained by City, shall be concrete and/or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
All subdivision streetlights shall be privately owned and maintained by the Home Owners’ Association, and built in accordance with the approved Windsor Cove improvement plans, consistent with the Village 5 GDP to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The selection of the private onsite streetlights and design of the lighting system shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department and City Engineer. Streetlights and similar fixtures shall be directed away from residences. Light pole spacing shall be per the approved deviation to standards on file.

The street lighting foundation design shall be included with the Street Lighting Plan.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

60. ** Applicant shall submit a photometric plan to demonstrate street lighting provided meets the City of Lincoln Lighting Standards for coverage (Lumens) for Moore Road frontage including all proposed public use areas within the project.

Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

61. The Applicant shall review options with Community Development staff to minimize visual impacts and monotony in the design of any sound walls. If used, walls should be constructed of masonry and utilize graffiti resistant materials. Wall design and materials shall be subject City’s approval and according to the design standards in the approved Village 5 Specific Plan and General Development Plan.

Prior to
Improvement
Plans and Final
Map
Community
Development
Attachment 10
543
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

IMPROVEMENT PLAN NOTES

62. Dust control measures shall be established prior to construction of any phase of development pursuant to the requirements of the Mitigation Monitoring Plan.

Additional dust control measures may be required by the City Engineer based upon site conditions.

The following note shall be added to the Grading and/or Improvement Plans:
“To minimize dust/grading impacts during construction, the Applicant shall:
a. Spray water on all exposed earth surfaces during clearing, grading, earth moving and other site preparation activities throughout the day.
b. Use tarpaulins or other affective covers on all stockpiled earth material and on all haul trucks.
c. Sweep the adjacent streets frontages at least once a day or as needed to remove silt and other dirt which is evident from construction activities. d. Ensure that construction vehicles are cleaned prior to leaving the construction site to prevent dust and dirt from being tracked off-site.
e. The City shall have the authority to stop all grading operations, if in opinion of City staff, inadequate dust control measures are being practiced or excessive wind conditions contribute to fugitive dust emissions.
f. The grading shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program.” Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

63. A note shall be added to the Grading Plans that states:
“Prior to the commencement of grading operations, the contractor shall identify the site where the deficit earthen material shall be borrowed. A report issued by a geotechnical engineer shall be submitted to verify that the imported materials are suitable for project fill. If the borrow site is within the City of Lincoln, the contractor shall show proof of all approved Grading Plans. Haul routes to be used shall be approved by the City Engineer.”
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
544
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

64. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“Construction in the project shall take place between the hours of 7:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, unless written approval is granted by the Community Development Department for private property and the City Engineer for mass grading and public improvements, allowing work for different days or hours.” “Radios and other musical equipment noise shall be played at levels consistent with the City of Lincoln standards so as to be contained on-site.” Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

65. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“All contractors are required to deliver all construction related refuse collected in debris boxes to the Western Placer Waste Management Authority Material Recovery Facility.

The City reserves the right to require that a franchise agreement be approved with any refuse handler at any time during the construction process.” Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

66. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“Seventy-two (72) hour notification must be given to the City of Lincoln prior to disinfection of any water mains. The contractor shall coordinate with the City Construction Inspector to schedule with the Public Services Department at 434-2450 for disinfection and testing.”
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

67. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“The Applicant shall submit Environmental surveys in compliance with the mitigation measures. The Applicant shall secure Community Development Department (Planning) approval that surveys are adequate and mitigation measures are incorporated into the Plan prior to start of any on-site construction.”
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

68. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“The Applicant shall require their contractors to work with the Police Department in the development of security measures during construction to increase security of stored equipment and materials on-site and to minimize demands on police protection services during project construction.”
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
545
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

69. A note shall be added to the Improvement Plans:
“All construction contractors shall provide a Spill Prevention and Counter Measure Plan describing measures to insure proper collection and disposal of all pollutants handled or produced on the project site during construction, including sanitary wastes, cement, and petroleum products. The Plan shall be submitted to the City’s Fire Department and City Engineer prior to each phase of construction.”
Prior to
approval of
Improvement
Plans
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

FINAL MAP

70. Prior to the approval of each Final Map, the Applicant shall enter into a standard City Subdivision Agreement with the City identifying the public improvements, if any, to be constructed with each phase. The Applicant shall provide security, in one of the standard forms acceptable to the City Attorney and consistent with the Subdivision Map Act guaranteeing construction of the improvements. If any public improvements required by the City pursuant to this subdivision or local ordinance have not been completed and accepted in accordance with conditional approval of the tentative map, the City, as a condition precedent to the approval of the final map, shall require the subdivider to enter into a mutually agreeable terms to complete the improvements in a manner authorized by Government Code Sections 66462(a) and 66499.5.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development,
City Engineer

71. Arrangements shall be made by the Applicant during the review of Final Maps by the City for the abandonment of all existing utility and temporary construction easements or excess right-of-way no longer required as well as arrangements for the dedication of new easements and/or rights-or-way required to carry out project conditions of approval. Separate document easements required by the City shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and submitted for review by the City Surveyor, Community Development Department and City Engineer.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

72. The Landowner shall convey all groundwater rights to the City of Lincoln with the recordation of any Final Maps.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer
Attachment 10
546
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

73. The Owner shall dedicate public utility easements for underground facilities of a size established by City Standards and Specifications and consistent with the City’s franchise agreements as part of each Final Map.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

74. The words “traffic control appurtenances” shall be included on the cover sheet of Final Map in the list of utilities allowed in public utility easements (PUE’s) located along public roads.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

75. The Owner shall provide a funding mechanism for the annual maintenance and operation of public streets, street lights, parks, landscaping, open space, water quality features, storm drain facilities, detention and retention facilities, and traffic signals (except those facilities maintained by an HOA). This funding mechanism may consist of a Special Tax, Assessment District, or endowment, at the discretion of the City. If the project is within a current finance mechanism such as Benefit Assessment District No. 1, or CFD 2018-1; an expenditure/revenue analysis should be completed if the number of units or amount of public improvements to be maintained have changed since preliminary approval to ensure the project will cover the costs of the annual maintenance and operation of the public improvements. Compliance with this condition shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Annually the costs will be allocated proportionately against the individual lots in accordance with the benefits received. Annual adjustments shall be applied in accordance with the Consumer Price Index plus 3% as determined by the City to adjust the assessment for inflation as needed to meet any actual increased costs. Annexation into CFD 2018-1 could satisfy this condition.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development,
Support
Services and
City Engineer
Attachment 10
547
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

76. The Owner shall provide a funding mechanism for the additional demand on public safety and public library, etc. This funding may consist of annexation to CFD 2018-2 or other funding mechanism as is acceptable to the City. A fiscal impact analysis should be completed to ensure the project will cover the costs of the additional services needed.

Compliance with this condition shall be to the satisfaction of the Finance Director, Community Development Director. Annually the costs will be allocated proportionately against the individual lots in accordance with the benefits received. Annual adjustments shall be applied in accordance with the Consumer Price Index plus 3% as determined by the City to adjust the assessment for inflation as needed to meet any actual increased costs.

Prior to Final
Map approval
Community
Development,
Support
Services and
City Engineer

77. The Applicant will participate in the City’s Public Facilities Element (PFE) Fee program current at the time of issuance of each building permit Issuance of
Each Building
Permit
Community
Development

78. The project is subject to the Village 5 Specific Plan Infrastructure and Finance Plan Area Fee, or the Interim Fee Agreement for the Village 5 Specific Plan Infrastructure Financing Plan, whichever is in affect at the time of first Final Map approval.

Prior to first
Small-Lot Final
Map approval
Planning &
Development
Engineering

79. If required, the Applicant with the assistance of the Fire Department and Community Development Department shall develop a Wildland Fire Management Program. The Plan shall provide for the maintenance of undisturbed vegetation in open space areas located on the project site on an annual basis and be submitted to the City Police/Fire Department for approval prior to the recordation of any Final Small Lot Maps.

Prior to
recordation of
any Final Map
approval
Planning, Fire

80. The Applicant shall provide to the Engineering Department copies of the Final Maps for each phase after the City Engineer’s approval but prior to City Council approval:
• Two digital copies of the Final Map in DWG format compatible with the City’s mapping and PDF
• One plot or print of the submittal
Prior to Final
Map approval
City Engineer
Attachment 10
548
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

81. Prior to City approval of a final map, the Applicant shall file with the Placer County Clerk, a certificate from the Placer County Tax Collector’s Office indicating that no liens against the subdivision or any part thereof exist for unpaid State, County, Municipal or local taxes or special assessments collected with taxes, except those not yet due and payable.

Prior to Final
Map Approval
by City Council
Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

82. After recordation of the Final Map, the Applicant shall provide to the City Engineer one copy of the recorded Final Map.

Immediately
after
recordation of
Final Map
Community
Development
and City
Engineer

83. Dedicate rights of ways and easements for public improvements, open space and parks lots shown on the Small Lot Final Map(s) and construct those improvements or enter into a public improvement/subdivision agreement with bonds, pursuant to Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Concurrent
with filing the
Small Lot Final
Maps with the
City Council.

Development
Engineering
and City
Engineer

84. **Dedications required for public street & highway purposes/landscape & public utility easements for New Nelson Lane frontage & Moore Road frontage shall be generally as per approved tentative maps. These dedications shall be required prior to/concurrent with the first final map acceptance. City will accept the IOD for public street & highway purposes, open space and Park purposes once backbone plans are designed and constructed prior to final map acceptance, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Concurrent
with filing the
first Final
Map(s) with
the City
Council
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer

85. *The Development Agreement shall address the obligation of the Applicant to reimburse for facilities constructed by third parties which benefit the Applicant, if any.

Prior to
Recordation of
Final Map
Community
Development
& City
Engineer

86. * All open space parcels with treatment basins and swales will be owned and maintained by the Home Owner’s Association.

Prior to
approval of
each Final Map
Development
Engineering,
City Engineer
Attachment 10
549
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

87. ** A Home Owners’ Association shall be formed which will own and maintain curb, gutter, private streets, sidewalk, pavement, street lighting, storm drainage, stormwater quality facilities, sewer lift station (if proposed), landscaping (including along Moore Road and New Nelson Lane project frontage), fences and, walls. City to maintain any dedicated open space lots.

Applicant shall provide CC&Rs for City review and approval by the City prior to approval of the Final Map.

Prior to
approval of the
Final Map
Community
Development
& City
Engineer

PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION

88. The Applicant shall apply for and obtain an Encroachment Permit from the City Engineer prior to any work conducted within the existing or proposed public right-of-way.

Prior to
beginning
construction
City Engineer

89. The Applicant, before performing construction activities within the project area and prior to each phase of development shall submit a construction schedule to the Fire Department to allow coordination of fire protection services during construction.

Prior to any
construction
activity
City Engineer
and Fire
Department

90. The Applicant shall consult/notify with the service provider of Gas, telephone, CATV and Electrical System Design Departments at the earliest available opportunity concerning all applicable Development Plans, site improvements, and construction schedules. The project sponsors shall maintain contact with the service provider so that required facilities and easements will be developed in a coordinated manner.

Prior to
construction
City Engineer

91. An on-site meeting with the Applicant, contractor, superintendent, engineers, and City representatives to review special procedures, limits of work, lines of authority and special conditions or procedures shall take place prior to any significant grading activity.

The Applicant shall provide an organization chart displaying lines of authority and phone numbers for each individual shown in a supervisory capacity. The Applicant shall designate in writing before the start of work an authorized representative who will have authority to act on behalf of the project. Said representative should be available on the job site during all construction or accessible by phone. The representative shall also make any necessary arrangements with the City Engineer concerning extended or emergency work periods.

Prior to any
construction
City Engineer
Attachment 10
550
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

92. All construction haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to commencement of any construction activity.

Prior to any
construction
City Engineer

93. The Applicant shall coordinate the placement of centralized mail delivery units, if required by the Post Office or provide verification that centralized mail delivery units will not be required by the Post Office. The placement of the units, if required by the Post Office, shall give consideration to concepts of defensible space, such as street lighting and visibility, ADA accessibility, as well as consumer convenience. The centralized mail delivery units shall not be located within any of the water quality LID areas identified on the Subdivision Map and/or Improvement Plans.

Prior to any
construction
Community
Development

DURING CONSTRUCTION

94. Consistent with the recommendations of a soils engineer and as approved by the City Engineer, grading should be scheduled to avoid seasonally high groundwater conditions in swale areas.

During
Construction
City Engineer

95. For Windsor Cove project, the Applicant shall provide a specific geotechnical analysis to determine the suitability of excavated material (if proposed for use) as engineered fill, and trench backfilling, topsoil, or other types of reuse on-site such as landscaping fill in parks. If during construction the Applicant identifies any unique unforeseen soils conditions, the Applicant shall within 24-hours notify its geotechnical consultant to provide an analysis to the City Engineer for approval concerning any remediation action.

During
Construction
City Engineer

96. If during the course of development, it is determined by the Community Development Director that in order to maintain the construction schedule that a contract mitigation monitoring coordinator is needed, the Applicant will fund the full cost of mitigation monitoring related to the project.

During
construction
Planning

97. The Applicant/Contractor shall be responsible for the cleaning of all public streets impacted by Windsor Cove project construction. The manner and frequency of street cleaning shall be determined by the City Engineer based upon field conditions.

During
construction
City Engineer
Attachment 10
551
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1

98. For potable construction water, flows shall not exceed 500 gpm and 500,000 gallons per day subject to approval by the City. All flows shall be metered and monitored by the Applicant. The cost of potable construction water shall be at a rate established by the City. Any use of potable water for construction shall be subject to availability as determined by the City.

During
construction
City Engineer

99. The project shall provide for a system to inform all contractors and subcontractors and other affiliated parties conducting business within the City that a Business License must be obtained from the City. Prior to the preconstruction meeting, the Applicant shall submit to the City of Lincoln a list containing all parties doing business within the City as a result of the project. The City will check the list to ensure that each party has obtained the necessary Business License.

Prior to
issuance of
Building
Permits and
during
construction
Building
100. The Applicant may place a temporary sales and/or construction building (trailer) on the project site during project construction, subject to approval of the Community Development Department. The Applicant shall submit information to the Community Development Department regarding the location and services available to the structure as well as elevations of the temporary facility. Use of the facility will be subject to the approval of the Community Development Department.

During
construction
Building

PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE
101. The Applicant shall be responsible for repairing street damage caused by construction equipment associated with the Windsor Cove project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer
102. The Applicant, through his/her engineer or surveyor, shall set sufficient durable monuments to conform to the standards prescribed in Section 8771 of the Business and Professional Code of California, and street monuments in accordance with the City Design Criteria and Procedures manual.

Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer
103. The project shall be required to underground all existing overhead public utilities, if 21Kv or less, as per Municipal Code requirements.

Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer
Attachment 10
552
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1
104. The Applicant shall provide the City with a hard copy of the “As-Built Plans” including in AutoCAD format compatible with the City’s mapping acceptable to the City Engineer.

Prior to
Acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer
105. Existing and proposed public facilities and improvements damaged during the course of construction shall be repaired by the Applicant, at his expense, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to Notice
of Completion
and
Acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer
106. When improvements to public landscape corridors, median islands, and trails are completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Public Services Department, the improved property shall be conveyed by a grant deed to the City, for on-going maintenance, operation, repair and replacement. The Applicant shall be responsible to pay the direct cost associated with the performance of this work. If dedicated to the City, the Applicant shall be responsible for payment of costs until such time as the City begins collecting funds for this work or the cost of doing this work is incorporated into a financing mechanism to fund the costs of this work. City shall accept the IOD in place upon completion of the work.

Prior to the
Acceptance of
Improvements
City Engineer
and Public
Services
107. The contractor shall be responsible for the televising of all sewer collection and conveyance facilities. A 72-hour notification, both written and verbal, shall be given to the City Engineer prior to the televising of the sewer system. If not properly notified the City may elect to require a re-testing of the subject system.

Prior to Notice
of Completion
City Engineer

PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT
108. Finished exterior grades shall be sloped away from foundations to provide removal of surface water runoff away from structures. All building pads shall be provided with drainage away from foundations and to a properly controlled discharge system. No surface runoff should be allowed to flow from the pad over an unprotected slope.

Terraced lots should avoid uncontrolled discharge of surface water runoff onto adjoining lots.

Prior to
approval of
Plot Plans
Building,
Development
Engineering
Attachment 10
553
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1
109. Fire hydrants or other acceptable alternative approved by the City, providing service for construction sites shall be operational prior to combustible vertical building construction beginning.

Prior to
issuance of
Building
Permits
Building
110. All private exterior lighting is to be uniform or complimentary throughout the project.

Private exterior lighting to be provided for all access driveways, parking areas and walkways so as to facilitate protection of private property and safe pedestrian movement within the project site. Such lighting shall be accomplished in such a manner as not to illuminate adjacent properties or street which may be objectionable or hazardous. Detailed Construction Plans depicting the location and type of all lighting fixtures to be submitted and approved by the Building, Planning, and Police Department as part of the Construction Plans.

Prior to
issuance of
Building Permit
Community
Development,
Police
Department
111. The project shall be subject to the payment of Western Placer Unified School District school fees.

Prior to
issuance of
Building
Permits
Building
112. The Applicant shall pay all applicable fees at time of issuance of the Building Permit. Prior to issuance of
Building
Permits
Building
113. The project shall be subject to the Placer County Capital Facilities Impact Fee. Prior to issuance of
Building
Permits
Building
114. The Applicant shall comply with the General Plan, Village 5 Plan Area Fees, and Development Agreement regarding Park Dedication and Fees, if applicable.

Prior to
approval of the
First Final Map
Building
Attachment 10
554
Exhibit A
Windsor Cove - Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions of Approval

CDD Template Version 1.1
115. The development of residential dwelling units shall be subject to the review and approval process of Design Review as set forth in the City’s Municipal Code.

Prior to the
issuance of the
Building
Permits
Planning
116. All water meters shall be installed by the Public Services Department as per standards and specifications adopted by the City of Lincoln in June 2004 and as thereafter amended. A fee (applied city-wide) will be required for the cost and installation of each meter and may be adjusted annually based upon costs.

Prior to First
Inspection
following
issuance of
Building
Permits
Building and
Public
Services

PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY
117. The Applicant shall install all fire protection measures required pursuant to the then applicable City Standards. All residential units shall be fire sprinkled in accordance with the 2022 California Fire Code, or the Fire Code in effect at the time of Building Permit application.

Prior to Final
Inspection /
Occupancy
Building
Attachment 10
555
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-1 ESA / 130368 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 CHAPTER 4
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Introduction
Section 15097 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines requires public agencies to establish monitoring or reporting programs for projects approved by a public agency whenever approval involves the adoption of either a mitigated negative declaration or specified environmental findings related to environmental impact reports.

The following is the updated Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) for the Village 5 Specific Plan.

The intent of the MMP is to prescribe and enforce a means for properly and successfully implementing the mitigation measures identified within the Draft Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report (DPREIR) and the Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan EIR (2017 EIR) and updated in the Draft Partially Recirculated EIR (DPREIR) for this project.

Mitigation Measures
The mitigation measures are taken from the 2017 EIR and DPREIR and are assigned the same number as in the 2017 EIR and updated in the DPREIR. The MMP describes the actions that must take place to implement each mitigation measure, the timing of those actions, and the entities responsible for implementing and monitoring the actions.

MMP Components
The components of the attached table, which contains applicable mitigation measures, are addressed briefly, below.

Impact
This column summarizes the impact stated in the 2017 EIR, or as updated and stated DPREIR.

Mitigation Measure
All mitigation measures that were identified in the 2017 EIR are presented, as revised in the DPREIR and updated in the Final EIR, and numbered accordingly.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
556

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-2 ESA / 130368 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 Action(s)
For every mitigation measure, one or more actions are described. The actions delineate the means by which the mitigation measures will be implemented, and, in some instances, the criteria for determining whether a measure has been successfully implemented. Where mitigation measures are particularly detailed, the action may refer back to the measure.

Component
This column identifies the relevant component of the proposed projects to which the mitigation measure applies. The mitigation measure may apply to the Full Specific Plan, Area A, or Windsor Cove. More than one project component may be identified.

Implementing Party
This item identifies the entity that will undertake the required action.

Timing
Implementation of the action must occur prior to or during some part of project approval, project design or construction or on an ongoing basis. The timing for each measure is identified.

Monitoring Party
The City of Lincoln is primarily responsible for ensuring that mitigation measures are successfully implemented. Within the City, a number of departments and divisions would have responsibility for monitoring some aspect of the overall project. Other agencies, such as the Placer County Air Quality Management District, may also be responsible for monitoring the implementation of mitigation measures. As a result, more than one monitoring party may be identified.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
557

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-3 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.1 Aesthetics and Visual Quality

3.1-4: Implementation of the
proposed project would introduce
light and glare into the project area.

3.1-4:

During the design review process, the applicant shall adhere to the following measures to reduce impacts from light and glare:
a) All light standards shall be shielded and directed downward so that light shall not emit higher than a horizontal level.
b) Reflective surfaces of multi-story buildings facing streets, open spaces, parks, and residential neighborhoods shall be oriented to avoid generating glare that could create a nuisance or safety hazard.
c) For parks or other facilities anticipated to include nighttime activities, the site and placement of overhead lighting shall be designed to minimize exposure of adjacent properties to spillover light and minimize the amount of light that would be visible above the horizontal plane of the light fixture.
d) Normal operating hours for lighting related to nighttime recreational activities shall be until 10:00 p.m. Sunday through Thursday, and on Friday and Saturday until 11:00 p.m. to reduce the disruption to adjacent properties. Special events that would require lighting beyond normal operating hours would be subject to a permit to be issued by the City.
e) All light standards shall be the minimum height possible to achieve necessary lighting goals, subject to approval by the Public Services Director.

Shield and direct light downward.

Orient buildings to minimize glare.

Minimize light spillover for all parks and
recreational facilities.

Limit lighting for nighttime recreational
activities to 10pm Sunday through Thursday
and 11pm on Friday and Saturday, requiring
specially timed events to obtain a City
permit.

Require light standards that achieve lighting
goals and meet Public Services Director
approval.

Full Specific Plan/Area A Project applicant During design review process
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department, City
of Lincoln Public Services
Department

3.1-8: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
a cumulative increase in light and
glare in the vicinity of the Plan Area.

3.1-8:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4. See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.

3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Services

3.2-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would result in
conversion of Important Farmland to
non-agricultural use.

3.2-1(a):
a) If the PCCP has been approved and adopted, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP to mitigate impacts of converting Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, or Unique Farmland agricultural lands., most specifically rice lands. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in Mitigation Measure

3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2(b), shown below.

Comply with PCCP vis-à-vis agricultural
lands.

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-1.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During the permitting process
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2(b) in Section 3.4, Biological Resources, of this Draft EIR, shown below.

3.4-1
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to delineate all wetlands and waters of the U.S. or other protected waters within the proposed development. The delineation(s) shall be submitted to the USACE for verification as part of the formal Section 404 wetland delineation process. If no wetlands are determined to be present, or if wetlands would be avoided, no further mitigation would be required. Prior to fill of any wetlands, or hydrologic interruption of the wetland, the applicant must obtain a Section 404 permit and obtain Section 401 certification from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
2) For each 1.0 wetted acre of vernal pools impacted, 1.35 acres of vernal pools shall be preserved. For purposes of calculating impact and mitigation requirements, seasonal depressional wetlands shall be considered vernal pools.

For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the preservation requirement may be met by preserving 1.35 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The preservation requirement for open water may be met through preservation of 1.0 acres of open water or any wetland type for each1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required wetland preservation under this strategy will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland preservation required by any permitting agency.

Implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and

3.4-2(b).

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During the permitting process
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
558

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-4 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party For each 1.0 acres of vernal pool impact, 1.25 acres of compensatory wetlands shall be restored, enhanced or created including a minimum of 0.75 acres of vernal pool and no more than 0.5 acres of other wetlands. For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the restoration, enhancement, or creation requirement may be met by restoring, enhancing, and/or creating 1.25 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The compensatory requirement for open-water may be met through restoration, enhancement, and/or creation of 1.25 acres of open water or any wetland type for each 1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required compensatory wetland restoration, enhancement, or creation under this measure will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland restoration, enhancement, and creation required by any permitting agency as well as any wetland preservation required by a permitting agency greater than the wetland preservation amount required by this mitigation.

The compensatory requirement shall not be reduced below 1.0 by excess preservation.

Approximately 715 acres of land within the PCCP Reserve Acquisition Area that would serve as suitable mitigation land for impacts on habitat within Area A have been identified and acquired by the applicant. All mitigation lands would be located within the Upper Coon-Upper Auburn watershed north of Auburn Ravine.

Soil types at these mitigation lands would consist primarily of San JoaquinCometa sandy loams soils, with some occasionally flooded Xerofluvents soils, frequently flooded Xerofluvents soils, Cometa sandy loam soils, and CometaFiddyment complex soils. Some of these soils have impervious soil layers and support vernal pool complexes or could be restored to vernal pool or seasonal swale habitats. If the entire mitigation area is not needed for mitigation of Area A impacts, impacts to vernal pool habitats and species within other areas could be mitigated on these lands.

The mitigation lands are currently used as mostly grassland/pasture and fallow/ idle cropland, with some areas used to grow winter wheat, hay/non-alfalfa, and other crops. The mitigation lands are largely surrounded by fallow/idle cropland, rice fields, hay/non-alfalfa fields, and active cropland used for growing clover/wildflowers, rye, corn, and other rotational crops. Management of the mitigation lands could be modified to provide greater benefit to special-status plant and wildlife species.
3) Wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation shall be accompanied by the associated uplands and hydrology necessary to sustain long-term viability in a natural or restored environmental setting. 4) It is anticipated that most wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation may be accomplished on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement and will be subject to the required conservation easements and management plans. If additional lands are conserved to meet the wetland mitigation requirement, the same requirements for conservation easements and management plans shall apply.
5) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this strategy. 6) The density of wetlands on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement in some projects within the V5SP may provide wetland mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment shall be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other projects in the Plan Area to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City.
7) The City may allow mitigation located outside of Placer County that advances the City’s conservation goals and meets the biological intent of this mitigation strategy. In addition, the City may accept credits from out-of-county conservation or mitigation banks towards full or partial compliance with this strategy if the project is within the agency-approved service area for the credits.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
559

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-5 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Avoidance and Minimization Measures
8) Prior to any construction activities that could impact protected waters, a protective fence shall be erected around the boundaries of avoided wetlands, including a protective buffer as dictated in the 401, 404, or 1600 permits as described in section 9) below. This fence shall remain in place until all construction activity in the immediate area is completed. No activity shall be permitted within the protected areas except for those expressly permitted by the USACE and/or CDFW.
9) A construction buffer shall be provided along all avoided wetlands in accordance with the Section 404 permit, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Only those uses allowed in the Section 404 permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreements shall be permitted in the wetlands preserve and its buffer.
10) Water quality in the avoided wetlands shall be protected during construction in the watershed by using erosion control techniques including (as appropriate), but not necessarily limited to, preservation of existing vegetation, mulches (e.g., hydraulic, straw, wood), and geotextiles and mats. Additionally, urban runoff shall be managed to protect water quality in the wetlands preserve using techniques such as velocity dissipation devices, sediment basins and pollution collection devices.

3.4-2
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant shall obtain a Biological Opinion and any applicable incidental take authorization from USFWS and comply with the conditions and requirements therein.
2) The project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City, a Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that implements the open space, agricultural land and biological resources strategy and includes the following elements:
i. Identification and quantification of land cover and wetland removal and applicable mitigation requirements set forth below in subsection (5). ii. Identification and quantification of proposed mitigation lands and/or resources with sufficient detail to allow for City evaluation, including plans for restoration, enhancement and/or creation of wetlands.
iii. Identification of any conservation or mitigation bank credits or assignment of excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP.
iv. Draft conservation easements and draft management and monitoring plans, if applicable.
v. An endowment for long-term management of the proposed mitigation lands. 3) Any Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan must be approved by the City, in its sole discretion, at the time of the approval of any improvement plans for subdivision improvements or off-site infrastructure, recordation of a final map (not including a large lot final map that results in no disturbance of any existing natural condition), or issuance of any project-level discretionary approval for non-residential land uses that does not require a tentative subdivision map. A Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan may cover a development project or group of projects and must include any required off-site infrastructure unless covered by a separate project-level mitigation plan for that infrastructure improvement. The City may require the applicant to provide a conceptual plan for the Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that includes a calculation of acres of impact and acres of required mitigation prior to approval of a General Development Program or tentative map. A tentative map may have more than one Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan if the development authorized by the map is owned by separate owners.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
560

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-6 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party 4) Each project (including off-site infrastructure) must demonstrate compliance with an approved Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan prior to approval of a grading permit that results in land cover or wetland impact. Such compliance may be phased with the actual development of the project. Demonstration of compliance shall include:
i. Demonstrate recordation of required easements for land conservation. ii. Demonstrate ownership of applicable credits and/or assignment of any applicable excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP. iii. Demonstrate implementation of an endowment for the management of all mitigation lands.
iv. Demonstrate approval of construction and monitoring plans for any required restoration, enhancement, or creation of wetlands. Provide proof of executed contracts and initiation of construction.
v. Documentation and approval of any mitigation credits eligible for future use or assignment.
5) An Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan shall require that for every 1.0 acres of land cover impacted, 1.35 acres of land will be conserved in perpetuity. The impact area shall be calculated to the nearest onetenth (0.10) acre. The total amount of required acreage will be automatically reduced by any and all off-site conservation or mitigation land required by any permitting agency, specifically including upland areas required in association with wetland mitigation, whether acquired through mitigation bank credits or other means. The mitigation land to be conserved may be located in the Reserve Acquisition Areas, or elsewhere as determined by the City and regulatory agencies. No additional land mitigation will be required beyond the 1.35 to 1.0 requirement for the removal of land cover.
6) To determine the acreage of land cover impact, all land within the V5SP shall be considered to be “land cover,” except for land that is already developed with infrastructure, such as roadways, and homes and related development such as accessory structures, driveways, improved roadways, and landscaped areas.

Any land cover that will be maintained in or restored to a natural or semi-natural condition as required by the City and/or any state or federal permitting agency shall not be included in the land cover impacted acreage. Any wetland area required to be avoided, restored, and/or enhanced on site by the City and/or any permitting agency shall be automatically excluded from the removal calculation. 7) Land conserved under this measure shall, to the extent feasible, as determined by the City, be located within the Reserve Acquisition Area, but may be included in other areas deemed adequate by the regulatory agencies. Impacts to annual grassland, vernal pool grassland, and pasture lands cover shall be mitigated on existing or restorable grassland. All other land cover impacts may be mitigated on any natural or semi-natural land within the Reserve Acquisition Areas, specifically including agricultural land. Vernal pool grassland will be mitigated by any grassland without regard to wetted area density.
8) Conservation sites shall be subject to recorded conservation easements and management plans with an identified funding source for long-term management of conserved lands. The conservation easements and management plans are subject to approval by the City and shall provide for the long-term maintenance of biological functions and values while, whenever feasible, also providing for compatible agricultural use. The City shall accept as satisfactory mitigation any conservation easement and/or management plan required and approved by the terms and conditions of any permit issued by a state or federal resource agency. 9) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the conservation required by this strategy.

Specifically, the uplands associated with any bank wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement or creation may be applied towards the land cover mitigation requirement provided that the uplands are subject to an appropriate conservation easement and the applicant can demonstrate that the approved mitigation credits include both wetland and upland land cover to the satisfaction of the City. Mitigation and conservation banks must be approved by the USFWS, USACE, or the CDFW. Credits can count toward mitigation obligations if the banks are consistent with the requirements of state and federal natural resources agencies, as accepted by the City.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
561

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-7 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party 10) It is anticipated that, depending on the availability and relative parcel size of potential conservation sites, some projects within the V5SP may provide land cover mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and the Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment will be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other projects in the V5SP to meet all or a part of the land cover mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be provided to the satisfaction of the City.
11) Because of their particular regulatory status and their biological importance, wetlands shall be accounted for separately through mitigation ratios requiring preservation and or restoration of a set amount of wetted area calculated as a proportion of wetland impact as set forth in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. These wetted acres, along with any upland area that is conserved in association with the wetted acres, will be fully credited towards the required land cover mitigation.

It is intended that all of the wetland mitigation shall be counted towards land cover mitigation requirements. Likewise, all wetted acres contained within land cover mitigation shall be counted towards wetland mitigation.

3.2-1(b):

Concurrent with development of Area A, the project applicant shall preserve mitigation lands at ratios identified in Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2. The preserved land should be of similar agricultural productivity, soil classifications, and farmland type (Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, and Unique Farmland) as the land proposed for development in Area A. Conservation Easements for agricultural and biological resources may be stacked, meaning that areas preserved to mitigate for biological resources can may also serve as mitigation for agricultural impacts.

Preserve mitigation lands at ratios identified
in Mitigation Measures 3.4-1(b) and 3.4-2
Area A Project applicant During development of
Area A
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.3 Air Quality

3.3-2: Construction of land uses
under the proposed project would
generate criteria pollutant emissions
that could substantially contribute to
a potential violation of applicable air
quality standards or to nonattainment
conditions.

3.3-2a:

The applicant(s) shall implement the following mitigation measures for each phase of development in the time frames provided:
a) Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans, (whichever occurs first), on project sites greater than one acre, the applicant shall submit a Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District. The applicant shall provide written evidence to the City of Lincoln that the plan has been submitted to the District. It is the responsibility of the applicant to deliver the approved plan to the local jurisdiction. The applicant shall not break ground prior to receiving District approval of the Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan and delivering that approval to the City of Lincoln. The Construction Emission/Dust Control Plan shall include, but not be limited, to the following measures:
i. In order to control dust, an operational watering truck shall be on site during construction hours. In addition, dry chemical sweeping is prohibited. Watering at the construction site shall be carried out in the compliance with operating APCD rules and City of Lincoln requirements.
ii. Fugitive dust shall not exceed 40% opacity and not go beyond the project boundary at any time as required by District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust (Section 300). If lime or other drying agents are used to dry out wet grading areas, they shall be controlled so as to not exceed District Rule 228 Fugitive Dust limitations.

The prime contractor shall be responsible for having an individual, certified by CARB to perform Visible Emissions Evaluations (VEE), who shall routinely evaluate compliance to Rule 228, Fugitive Dust on a weekly basis. iii. The track-out of bulk material onto public paved roadways as a result of operations, or erosion, shall be minimized by the use of track-out and erosion control, minimization, and preventative measures. Specifically, the prime contractor shall apply water or use other methods to control dust track out so construction vehicles leaving the site shall reduce dust, silt, mud, and dirt from being released or tracked off-site. Also, the prime contractor “wet broom” the streets (or use another method to control dust as approved by the City) if silt, dirt, mud or debris is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares within one hour from adjacent streets anytime such material track-out extends for a cumulative distance of greater than 50 feet onto any paved public road during active operations.

Submit a Construction Emission/Dust
Control Plan.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
562

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-8 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party iv. Traffic speeds on all unpaved surfaces shall be limited to 15 miles per hour or less.
v. To control dust once grading is complete, the prime contractor shall apply methods such as surface stabilization, establishment of the vegetative cover, paving, or other methods approved by the City.
vi. The prime contractor shall suspend all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous gusts) are high (typically winds greater than 25 miles per hour), and dust is traveling offsite.
vii. Stockpiles of dirt shall be covered when not being used or otherwise controlled to prevent erosion and/or dust.
b) The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e., make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower or greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. If any new equipment is added after submission of the inventory, the prime contractor shall contact the District prior to the new equipment being utilized. At least three business days prior to the use of subject heavy-duty offroad equipment, the project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, name, and phone number of the property owner, project manager, and on-site foreman.

Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans, (whichever occurs first), the applicant(s) shall provide a written calculation to the District for approval demonstrating that the heavy-duty (> 50 horsepower) off-road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased and subcontractor vehicles, will meet Tier 4 emission standards or the equivalent Tier standards established by the State in place at the time of construction. If Tier 4 equipment is unavailable for any equipment type, the prime contractor shall notify the PCAPCD that Tier 3 off-road equipment will be utilized.

Provide comprehensive construction
equipment inventory and anticipated
construction timeline.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
c) During construction, the contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., electricity) or clean fuel (e.g., propane, gasoline, biodiesel, and/or natural gas) generators rather than temporary diesel power generators, to the degree feasible.

Use existing or cleaner fuels and power
sources, where possible.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
d) During construction, the contractor shall minimize idling time to a maximum of 5 minutes for all diesel-powered equipment.

Minimize engine idling time to a five-minute
maximum.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
e) Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas of the construction site to limit idling to a maximum of 5 minutes.

Provide signage indicating five-minute
maximum time for engine idling.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
f) No open burning of removed vegetation shall be allowed unless permitted by the PCAPCD. All removed vegetation material shall either be chipped on site or taken to an appropriate recycling site, or if a recycling site is not available, a licensed disposal site.

Remove vegetation through chipping or at
an appropriate recycling or disposal site.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
g) A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) caused by the use or manufacture of Cutback or Emulsified asphalts for paving, road construction or road maintenance, unless such manufacture or use complies with the provisions of Rule 217.

Avoid discharging VOCs into the
atmosphere.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
h) Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated.

Maintain proper working condition for all
construction equipment.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
563

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-9 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.3-3: Operational activities
associated with development under
the proposed project would result in
emissions of criteria air pollutants at
levels that would substantially
contribute to a potential violation of
applicable air quality standards or to
nonattainment conditions.

3.3-3:

To reduce operational emissions of ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5, the following PCAPCD Standard Operational Air Quality Mitigation Measures shall be implemented as part of the project’s final design:
a) Diesel trucks shall be prohibited from idling more than five minutes. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the applicant shall show on the submitted building elevations that all truck loading and unloading docks shall be equipped with one 110/208 volt power outlet for every two dock doors. Diesel Trucks idling for more than the allotted time shall be required to connect to the 110/208 volt power to run any auxiliary equipment. A minimum 2’x3’ signage which indicates “Diesel engine Idling limited to a maximum of five minutes” shall be included with the submittal of building plans.

Implement PCAPCD Standard Operational
Air Quality Mitigation Measures.

V5SP and Area A Prime Contractor Prior to Building Permit issuance
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
b) Prior to Design Review approval, the Site Plan shall show that the applicant has provided the number of preferential parking spaces for employees that carpool/vanpool/rideshare as required by the District. Such stalls shall be clearly demarcated with signage as approved by the Design Review Board.

Provide preferential parking for employees
that carpool/vanpool/rideshare.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant Prior to Design Review approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District
c) Prior to Design Review approval, the applicant shall show that on-site bicycle racks will be provided as required by the District.

Demonstrate provision of on-site bicycle
racks.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant Prior to Design Review approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
Placer County Air Pollution
Control District

3.3-5: Development under the
proposed project would locate
sensitive residential receptors in
close proximity to SR 65, which
would result in the exposure of
persons to substantial toxic air
contaminant concentrations.

3.3-5:
a) The Specific Plan design guidelines and development standards shall incorporate the following measures to reduce or avoid exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs:
i. New sensitive land uses shall not be permitted within 300 feet of a large gasoline station (defined as a facility with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater). Require a 50-foot separation between gasoline stations with a throughput less than 3.6 million gallons per year.
ii. Only non-perchloroethylene dry-cleaning facilities shall be permitted within the Plan Area.

Reduce TAC exposure by placing new
sensitive lands uses no closer than 300 feet
of a large gasoline station and only permit
non-perchloroethylene dry-cleaning
facilities.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to Design Guidelines
approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) Residential units shall not be constructed at distances less than 100 feet of the edge of the SR 65 right-of-way.

Construct residential units at least 100 feet
from the edge of the SR 65 ROW.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to Design Guidelines
approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.3-7: The proposed project would
result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant
for which the region is in
nonattainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors).

3.3-7:

The applicant(s) shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.3-3 to reduce operational ROG, NOx and PM10 emissions.

See Mitigation Measure 3.3-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.3-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.3-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.3-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.3-3.

3.4 Biological Resources

3.4-1: Implementation of the
proposed project could have a
substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act through direct removal,
placement of fill, hydrological
interruption, or by other means and
would result in fill of jurisdictional
wetlands or other protected waters.

3.4-1:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to delineate all wetlands and waters of the U.S. or other protected waters within the proposed development. The delineation(s) shall be submitted to the USACE for verification as part of the formal Section 404 wetland delineation process. If no wetlands are determined to be present, or if wetlands would be avoided, no further mitigation would be required. Prior to fill of any wetlands, or hydrologic interruption of the wetland, the applicant must obtain a Section 404 permit and Provide mitigation at specified ratios. Full Specific Plan, Area A, and Windsor Cove
Project applicant During construction of each
project phase.

City of Lincoln Community
Development Department,
United States Army Corps of
Engineers
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
564

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-10 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party obtain Section 401 certification from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
2) For each 1.0 wetted acre of vernal pools impacted, 1.35 acres of vernal pools shall be preserved. For purposes of calculating impact and mitigation requirements, seasonal depressional wetlands shall be considered vernal pools.

For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the preservation requirement may be met by preserving 1.35 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The preservation requirement for open water may be met through preservation of 1.0 acres of open water or any wetland type for each 1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required wetland preservation under this strategy will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland preservation required by any permitting agency.

For each 1.0 acres of vernal pool impact, 1.25 acres of compensatory wetlands shall be restored, enhanced or created including a minimum of 0.75 acres of vernal pool and no more than 0.5 acres of other wetlands. For each 1.0 acres of impact of any other wetland type, the restoration, enhancement, or creation requirement may be met by restoring, enhancing, and/or creating 1.25 acres of any wetland type without regard for in-kind mitigation. The compensatory requirement for open-water may be met through restoration, enhancement, and/or creation of 1.25 acres of open water or any wetland type for each

1.0 acres of impact. The total amount of required compensatory wetland restoration, enhancement, or creation under this measure will be automatically reduced by any and all wetland restoration, enhancement, and creation required by any permitting agency as well as any wetland preservation required by a permitting agency greater than the wetland preservation amount required by this mitigation. The compensatory requirement shall not be reduced below 1.0 by excess preservation.

Approximately 715 acres of land within the PCCP Reserve Acquisition Area that would serve as suitable mitigation land for impacts on habitat within Area A have been identified and acquired by the applicant. All mitigation lands would be located within the Upper Coon-Upper Auburn watershed north of Auburn Ravine.

Soil types at these mitigation lands would consist primarily of San JoaquinCometa sandy loams soils, with some occasionally flooded Xerofluvents soils, frequently flooded Xerofluvents soils, Cometa sandy loam soils, and CometaFiddyment complex soils. Some of these soils have impervious soil layers and support vernal pool complexes or could be restored to vernal pool or seasonal swale habitats. If the entire mitigation area is not needed for mitigation of Area A impacts, impacts to vernal pool habitats and species within other areas could be mitigated on these lands.

The mitigation lands are currently used as mostly grassland/pasture and fallow/idle cropland, with some areas used to grow winter wheat, hay/non-alfalfa, and other crops. The mitigation lands are largely surrounded by fallow/idle cropland, rice fields, hay/non-alfalfa fields, and active cropland used for growing clover/wildflowers, rye, corn, and other rotational crops. Management of the mitigation lands could be modified to provide greater benefit to special-status plant and wildlife species.
3) Wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation shall be accompanied by the associated uplands and hydrology necessary to sustain long-term viability in a natural or restored environmental setting. 4) It is anticipated that most wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement and creation may be accomplished on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement and will be subject to the required conservation easements and management plans. If additional lands are conserved to meet the wetland mitigation requirement, the same requirements for conservation easements and management plans shall apply.
5) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this strategy. 6) The density of wetlands on land conserved to meet the land cover mitigation requirement in some projects within the V5SP may provide wetland mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment shall be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other Attachment 10 Exhibit B
565

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-11 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party projects in the Plan Area to meet all or a part of the wetland mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City.
7) The City may allow mitigation located outside of Placer County that advances the City’s conservation goals and meets the biological intent of this mitigation strategy. In addition, the City may accept credits from out-of-county conservation or mitigation banks towards full or partial compliance with this strategy if the project is within the agency-approved service area for the credits.

Avoidance and Minimization Measures
8) Prior to any construction activities that could impact protected waters, a protective fence shall be erected around the boundaries of avoided wetlands, including a protective buffer as dictated in the 401, 404, or 1600 permits as described in section 9) below. This fence shall remain in place until all construction activity in the immediate area is completed. No activity shall be permitted within the protected areas except for those expressly permitted by the USACE and/or CDFW.
9) A construction buffer shall be provided along all avoided wetlands in accordance with the Section 404 permit, and Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Only those uses allowed in the Section 404 permit and Section 401 Water Quality Certification and/or the Streambed Alteration Agreements shall be permitted in the wetlands preserve and its buffer.
10) Water quality in the avoided wetlands shall be protected during construction in the watershed by using erosion control techniques including (as appropriate), but not necessarily limited to, preservation of existing vegetation, mulches (e.g., hydraulic, straw, wood), and geotextiles and mats. Additionally, urban runoff shall be managed to protect water quality in the wetlands preserve using techniques such as velocity dissipation devices, sediment basins and pollution collection devices.

3.4-2: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in
adverse impacts to special-status
species, either directly or through
habitat modifications.

3.4-2:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

For species that are not directly covered by the PCCP, the project applicant shall implement the following avoidance and minimization measures:
1) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-6. 2) For the protection of American badger, the project applicant, for each project phase, shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a preconstruction American badger den survey within the project site. The results of the survey shall be provided to the City of Lincoln. If dens or burrows determined to be potential American badger dens are found within the project site or off-site improvement areas during the preconstruction surveys, consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) shall occur prior to the initiation of any construction activities to determine an appropriate burrow excavation and/or relocation method. If American badger burrows are not found, further measures are not necessary. All survey results shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln prior to the initiation of any construction activities.

Implement PCCP measures related to
habitat preservation.

Implement avoidance and minimization
measures for impacts to special status
species that are not covered by the PCCP.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
United States Fish and Wildlife
Service
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant shall obtain a Biological Opinion and any applicable incidental take authorization from USFWS and comply with the conditions and requirements therein.
2) The project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City, a Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that implements the open space, agricultural land and biological resources strategy and includes the following elements:

Implement habitat preservation at identified
ratios.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
United States Fish and Wildlife
Service
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
566

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-12 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party i. Identification and quantification of land cover and wetland removal and applicable mitigation requirements set forth below in subsection (5). ii. Identification and quantification of proposed mitigation lands and/or resources with sufficient detail to allow for City evaluation, including plans for restoration, enhancement and/or creation of wetlands.
iii. Identification of any conservation or mitigation bank credits or assignment of excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP.
iv. Draft conservation easements and draft management and monitoring plans, if applicable.
v. An endowment for long-term management of the proposed mitigation lands. 3) Any Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan must be approved by the City, in its sole discretion, at the time of the approval of any improvement plans for subdivision improvements or off-site infrastructure, recordation of a final map (not including a large lot final map that results in no disturbance of any existing natural condition), or issuance of any project-level discretionary approval for non-residential land uses that does not require a tentative subdivision map. A Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan may cover a development project or group of projects and must include any required off-site infrastructure unless covered by a separate project-level mitigation plan for that infrastructure improvement. The City may require the applicant to provide a conceptual plan for the Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan that includes a calculation of acres of impact and acres of required mitigation prior to approval of a General Development Program or tentative map. A tentative map may have more than one Project-Level Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resource Mitigation Plan if the development authorized by the map is owned by separate owners. 4) Each project (including off-site infrastructure) must demonstrate compliance with an approved Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan prior to approval of a grading permit that results in land cover or wetland impact. Such compliance may be phased with the actual development of the project. Demonstration of compliance shall include:
i. Demonstrate recordation of required easements for land conservation. ii. Demonstrate ownership of applicable credits and/or assignment of any applicable excess mitigation from other projects in the V5SP. iii. Demonstrate implementation of an endowment for the management of all mitigation lands.
iv. Demonstrate approval of construction and monitoring plans for any required restoration, enhancement, or creation of wetlands. Provide proof of executed contracts and initiation of construction.
v. Documentation and approval of any mitigation credits eligible for future use or assignment.
5) An Open Space, Agricultural Land and Biological Resources Mitigation Plan shall require that for every 1.0 acres of land cover impacted, 1.35 acres of land will be conserved in perpetuity. The impact area shall be calculated to the nearest onetenth (0.10) acre. The total amount of required acreage will be automatically reduced by any and all off-site conservation or mitigation land required by any permitting agency, specifically including upland areas required in association with wetland mitigation, whether acquired through mitigation bank credits or other means. The mitigation land to be conserved may be located in the Reserve Acquisition Areas, or elsewhere as determined by the City and regulatory agencies. No additional land mitigation will be required beyond the 1.35 to 1.0 requirement for the removal of land cover.
6) To determine the acreage of land cover impact, all land within the V5SP shall be considered to be “land cover,” except for land that is already developed with infrastructure, such as roadways, and homes and related development such as accessory structures, driveways, improved roadways, and landscaped areas.

Any land cover that will be maintained in or restored to a natural or semi-natural condition as required by the City and/or any state or federal permitting agency shall not be included in the land cover impacted acreage. Any wetland area required to be avoided, restored, and/or enhanced on site by the City and/or any permitting agency shall be automatically excluded from the removal calculation.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
567

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-13 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party 7) Land conserved under this measure shall, to the extent feasible, as determined by the City, be located within the Reserve Acquisition Area, but may be included in other areas deemed adequate by the regulatory agencies. Impacts to annual grassland, vernal pool grassland, and pasture lands cover shall be mitigated on existing or restorable grassland. All other land cover impacts may be mitigated on any natural or semi-natural land within the Reserve Acquisition Areas, specifically including agricultural land. Vernal pool grassland will be mitigated by any grassland without regard to wetted area density.
8) Conservation sites shall be subject to recorded conservation easements and management plans with an identified funding source for long-term management of conserved lands. The conservation easements and management plans are subject to approval by the City and shall provide for the long-term maintenance of biological functions and values while, whenever feasible, also providing for compatible agricultural use. The City shall accept as satisfactory mitigation any conservation easement and/or management plan required and approved by the terms and conditions of any permit issued by a state or federal resource agency. 9) Project applicants may use credits from approved conservation or mitigation banks to meet all or a part of the conservation required by this strategy.

Specifically, the uplands associated with any bank wetland preservation, restoration, enhancement or creation may be applied towards the land cover mitigation requirement provided that the uplands are subject to an appropriate conservation easement and the applicant can demonstrate that the approved mitigation credits include both wetland and upland land cover to the satisfaction of the City. Mitigation and conservation banks must be approved by the USFWS, USACE, or the CDFW. Credits can count toward mitigation obligations if the banks are consistent with the requirements of state and federal natural resources agencies, as accepted by the City.
10) It is anticipated that, depending on the availability and relative parcel size of potential conservation sites, some projects within the V5SP may provide land cover mitigation in excess of the acreage required by this strategy. Excess mitigation may be freely assigned by private agreement between projects within the City of Lincoln and the Lincoln Sphere of Influence. Such assignment will be documented and tracked by the City. Project applicants may apply excess mitigation assigned from other projects in the V5SP to meet all or a part of the land cover mitigation required by this measure provided proof of assignment can be provided to the satisfaction of the City.
11) Because of their particular regulatory status and their biological importance, wetlands shall be accounted for separately through mitigation ratios requiring preservation and or restoration of a set amount of wetted area calculated as a proportion of wetland impact as set forth in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. These wetted acres, along with any upland area that is conserved in association with the wetted acres, will be fully credited towards the required land cover mitigation.

It is intended that all of the wetland mitigation shall be counted towards land cover mitigation requirements. Likewise, all wetted acres contained within land cover mitigation shall be counted towards wetland mitigation.3.2-1(b) (Area A)

3.4-3: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss and/or degradation of vernal
pool habitat, and the loss of specialstatus vernal pool crustaceans or amphibians.

3.4-3:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-1, subsection b) and Mitigation Measure 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1 and 3.4-2. See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1 and 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1 and 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1 and 3.4-2.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1
and 3.4-2.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
568

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-14 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Avoidance and Minimization Measures
c) Orange exclusionary fencing shall be placed, and a buffer area of 250 feet (or lesser distance deemed sufficiently protective by a qualified biologist with approval from USFWS) maintained, around any avoided (preserved) vernal pool crustacean or western spadefoot toad habitat during construction to prevent impacts from construction vehicles and equipment. This fencing shall be inspected by a qualified biologist throughout the construction period to ensure that it is in good functional condition.

Provide fenced buffer area of 250 feet. Full Specific Plan, Area A, and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
d) Prior to beginning work on a project site, all on-site construction personnel shall receive instruction regarding the presence of listed species and the importance of avoiding impacts to these species and their habitat.

Instruct construction personnel about listed
species and avoiding impacts.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.4-4: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss and/or degradation of rare plant
populations.

3.4-4:
a) For Areas B through J, the project applicant(s) for each phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct focused botanical surveys in vernal pool complexes, fresh emergent marsh, seasonal wetlands and nonnative annual grassland habitats within the Plan Area for special-status plant species including, but not limited to, pincushion navarretia, dwarf downingia, slender Orcutt grass, Sanford’s arrowhead, and bigscale balsamroot during the appropriate time of year to detect each of these species.

In order to determine the appropriate survey window, the qualified biologist shall visit reference populations when such populations are available and accessible. If no special-status plants are located during the surveys, no mitigation would be required.

Conduct botanical surveys to determine
presence of special status plant species.

Areas B through J Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife
b) If special-status plant species are located during surveys in areas proposed for ground disturbance, the project applicant for each project shall mitigate for impacts to vernal pool wetlands and complexes as described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-3, for impacts to grasslands as described in Mitigation Measure3.4-2, and for wetlands as described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. The applicant shall also report the plant survey results to CDFW using a CNDDB field survey form. In addition, the applicant shall retain a qualified biologist to develop and implement a special-status plant salvage and transplantation plan that shall be approved by CDFW. The plan shall provide for the salvage of seeds of the impacted special-status plants and soil from the site surrounding those plants. The salvaged seeds and soil shall be transplanted to a protected site with appropriate habitat. To ensure the success of transplantation and the species, the applicant shall monitor the protected site for three years from the date of transplantation.

If special-status plant species are found,
implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-3 for
vernal pool wetlands, Mitigation Measure

3.4-2 for grasslands, and Mitigation
Measure 3.4-1 for wetlands. Use a CNDDB
survey form to report results to CDFW.

Areas B through J Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife
c) If state or federally-listed plants are found during surveys, project applicant for each project phase shall consult with CDFW to obtain an Incidental Take Permit under Section 2081 of the CESA and comply with the conditions and requirements therein, and/or USFWS to obtain a Biological Opinion under Section 7 of FESA and comply with the conditions and requirements.

If state or federally-listed species are found,
obtain Incidental Take Permit from CDFW
and comply with USFWS requirements.

Areas B through J Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department,
California Department of Fish
and Wildlife, United States Fish
and Wildlife Service

3.4-5: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss of western pond turtle and/or
degradation of potential habitat.

3.4-5:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures shall apply:
1) Prior to project construction for each phase that would disturb any potential habitat for western pond turtle, the project applicant(s) for such phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct preconstruction surveys of potential habitat and the vicinity (250 feet) within 30 days prior to project construction. If no western pond turtles are located, no mitigation would be required and construction could proceed.
2) If western pond turtles are determined to be present, and potential habitat is not proposed for modification due to development of the site, then exclusionary fencing shall be used to prevent the turtle(s) from entering the construction area.

The location of the fence shall be determined by a qualified biologist. Retained habitat shall also be protected through implementation of water quality and Implement habitat preservation at identified
ratios
Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
569

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-15 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party hydrology measures that ensure habitat remains viable post-construction as required for Clean Water Act Sections 401 and 404 permits and would be consistent with the Draft PCCP.
3) If occupied habitat would be impacted or lost, the project applicant(s) for each phase shall retain a qualified biologist approved by the CDFW to relocate all potentially affected western pond turtles into suitable habitat. Lost habitat would be mitigated through the Sections 401 and 404 permitting process, and would be consistent with the Draft PCCP.

3.4-6: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss or disturbance of nesting birds
and the loss or degradation of
special-status bird nesting and
foraging habitat.

3.4-6:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County, the City, and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP and that participation shall satisfy all of the mitigation requirements for this impact. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b) and/or (c), below, as applicable.

For special-status bird species that are not covered under the PCCP, the mitigation measures for nesting habitat in Mitigation Measure 3.4-6(c) shall be implemented.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Implement avoidance and minimization
measures for impacts to special status
species that are not covered by the PCCP.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures for foraging habitat shall apply:
1) The project applicant shall comply with Mitigation Measure 3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-2(b)(2)-(10). See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).
c) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and/or has not been approved by the agencies, the following mitigation measures for nesting habitat shall apply:
1) If construction activity that may disturb nesting birds (according to a qualified biologist) occurs during the nesting season (February 15 - September 1), the project applicant(s) for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre-construction breeding-season survey of the project site at least 30 days prior to onset of construction. Surveys for nesting raptors shall be conducted within ¼ mile of proposed construction activities. A survey for nesting birds shall be conducted within 500 feet of construction areas to determine if any birds are nesting on or within 500 feet of the project site. The results of the survey shall be valid only for the season when it is conducted. New surveys shall be conducted if construction of the surveyed area extends into the following season or if construction is suspended for more than 14 days during the nesting season, or if there is a substantial change in the level of disturbance at the site, unless all the potential nesting trees or other habitat have been removed. 2) If the pre-construction survey does not identify any protected raptor or bird nests on or within the buffers to the project site, no mitigation shall be required.

However, should any active nests be located within 500 feet of a proposed construction area at any time throughout the construction, the project applicant(s) for each project phase, in consultation with CDFW, shall avoid all bird nest sites located in the project site disturbance area(s) during the breeding season (approximately February 15 - September 1) while the nest is occupied with adults and/or young. This avoidance could consist of delaying construction in close proximity to the nest during the nesting season or establishing a non-disturbance buffer zone around the nest site. The size of the buffer zone shall be determined in consultation with CDFW. The buffer zone shall be delineated by orange temporary construction fencing. Any occupied nest shall be monitored by a qualified biologist to determine when the nest is no longer in use. Should construction activities cause the nesting bird to vocalize, make defensive flights at intruders, get up from a brooding position, or fly off the nest, then a qualified biologist should identify an increased exclusionary buffer such that activities are far enough from the nest to stop this agitated behavior.

Additional Measures for Swainson’s Hawk
3) The project applicant(s) for each project phase shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a Swainson’s hawk nesting survey within the area to be disturbed, extending out to one-half mile. The survey shall be conducted during the nesting season of the same calendar year that construction is expected to begin, and Conduct any tree removal and construction
activities according to the protocol
described in Mitigation Measure 3.4-6(c).

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During construction per the time frames described in
Mitigation Measure 3.4-6(c)
for tree removal and
construction activities
between March 15 and
August 30.

City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
570

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-16 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party prior to the issuance of any grading permits. If this survey does not identify any nesting Swainson’s hawk in the area within the project site that will be disturbed plus the one-half mile radius, no mitigation would be required. 4) Should any active Swainson’s hawk nests be located within one-half mile of the disturbance area, no project-related activities that could cause nest abandonment or forced fledging (such as heavy equipment operation), shall be initiated within the one-quarter mile (buffer zone) of an active nest between March 1 and September 15. If high quality Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat would be removed (i.e., alfalfa fields and pasture), then the applicant shall purchase mitigation credits for Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat at a CDFWapproved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.35:1 or protect similar value agricultural land at a ratio of 1.35:1 with a conservation easement that maintains the land in high-value Swainson’s hawk foraging habitat in perpetuity, consistent with Mitigation Measure 3.4-2(b)(2)-(10).

Additional Measures for Burrowing Owl
5) Prior to project construction the project applicant(s) for each project phase shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct both nesting and wintering season surveys for burrowing owl to determine if potential habitat within 500 feet of ground disturbance is used by this species. The timing and methodology for the surveys shall be based on the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. A qualified biologist will conduct four survey visits: 1) at least one visit between February 15 and April 15, and 2) a minimum of three survey visits, at least three weeks apart between April 15 and July 1. If feasible, at least one visit will occur after June 15.

Surveys will be conducted within areas that, according to the qualified biologist, could support burrowing owl nesting habitat at the project site and within 150 meters of areas that will be directly or indirectly impacted by the project, if feasible.
6) If burrowing owls are discovered during the surveys, the project applicant shall notify the CDFW. A qualified biologist shall monitor the owls and establish a fenced exclusion zone around each occupied burrow. No construction activities shall be allowed within the exclusion buffer zone until such time that the burrows are determined to be unoccupied by a qualified biologist. The buffer zones shall be a minimum of 150 feet from an occupied burrow during the non-breeding season (September 1 through January 31), and a minimum of 250 feet from an occupied burrow during the breeding season (February 1 through August 31). 7) If complete avoidance is not feasible, the CDFW shall be consulted regarding a Burrowing Owl Exclusion Plan. All activities that will result in a disturbance to burrows shall be approved by CDFW prior to implementation.

Additional Measures for Tricolored Blackbird
8) Prior to project construction the project applicant(s) for each project phase shall hire a qualified biologist to conduct a tricolored blackbird nesting survey within the area to be disturbed, targeting potential breeding habitat such as emergent marsh, riparian thickets, and blackberry brambles. Two surveys shall be conducted at least three weeks apart between March 15 and September 1 within 500 feet of the area subject to ground disturbance. If a nesting colony is found within the survey area the project applicant(s) shall consult with CDFW to develop a Tricolored Blackbird Mitigation Plan to avoid, minimize and compensate for impacts to occupied nesting habitat and adjacent foraging habitat. Mitigation measures may include work windows (March 15 to September 1) to avoid impacting an active on-site nesting colony, purchasing conservation easements to protect occupied nesting and foraging habitat, or other measures mutually agreed upon by the applicant(s) and CDFW.

3.4-7: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in the
loss of valley elderberry longhorn
beetle and/or loss or degradation of
potential habitat.

3.4-7:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted by the County and City and approved by the agencies, the The project applicant shall comply with the PCCP, which shall be deemed to mitigate for impacts to the VELB. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (c)-(e), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation or has not been adopted by the County and City processes for designating project impacts as covered under the PCCP have not been established and approved by the agencies, the project applicant shall comply with mitigation measures c) through e).

Protect elderberry shrubs as described in
Mitigation Measures 3.4-7(c) through

3.4-7(e).

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
571

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-17 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party c) For construction requiring consultation under Section 7 of the FESA, the project applicant shall obtain incidental take authorization and comply with the requirements therein. If no Section 7 consultation is required (because no federal permit is required), the applicant shall comply with mitigation measures (d) through (f). d) The removal of elderberry shrubs or their stems measuring one inch or greater (removal or trimming) shall be compensated for by salvaging and planting the affected elderberry shrubs and planting additional elderberry shrubs and associated native riparian plants at a 1:1 ratio. Mitigation planting shall occur, to the maximum extent practicable, in areas adjacent to the impact area and/or located to fill in existing gaps in riparian corridors. If the plants to be removed show recent boring holes, the project applicants shall consult with the USFWS and obtain incidental take authorization prior to removal.
e) Elderberry shrubs with stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level that are not proposed to be removed shall be protected as follows during construction:

1. Any ground disturbing activities within 100 feet of elderberry plants containing stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level shall provide a minimum setback of at least 20 feet from the drip line of each elderberry plant containing stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level. The setbacks shall be fenced and flagged to prohibit equipment and materials encroachment into the setback zone. Fire fuel breaks (disked land) may not be included within the 20-foot setback.

2. The project applicant shall brief the construction foreman on the need to avoid damaging the elderberry plants (unless the proper take authorization is obtained) and the possible penalties for not complying with these requirements. A copy of these mitigation measures shall be provided to the construction foreman for his distribution to his crews by the project applicant.

3. No insecticides, herbicides, fertilizers, or other chemicals that might harm the beetle or its host plant shall be used in the buffer areas, or within 100 feet of any elderberry plant with one or more stems measuring one inch or greater in diameter at ground level.

4. No mowing shall occur closer than five feet to elderberry plant stems. Mowing shall be done in a manner that avoids damaging elderberry plants (e.g., avoid stripping away bark through careless use of mowing/trimming equipment).

5. Trimming of elderberry stems less than one inch in diameter may occur between September 1 and March 14. The elderberry plants shall only be trimmed between November through the first two weeks in February, or when the plants are dormant and after they have lost their leaves.

3.4-8: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in
changes to surface water quality in
Auburn Ravine that could affect
Central Valley Steelhead and
Chinook salmon due to the
reconstruction and/or widening of
various bridges within the Plan Area.

3.4-8:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted and approved prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the The project applicant(s) (be they the City, County, or another agency) shall comply with the PCCP and mitigate for impacts to Central Valley steelhead and Chinook salmon as stated in the PCCP. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation has not been adopted and approved prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the project applicant(s) (be they the City, County, or another agency) shall comply with the following mitigation measures:
1) Obtain a Biological Opinion and incidental take authorization for Central Valley steelhead and winter-run and spring-run Chinook salmon from NMFS and comply with the conditions and requirements therein.
2) Obtain any necessary permits from the USACE, CDFW, and the RWQCB.

Dewatering plans and the specific temporary impacts to Auburn Ravine associated with bridge construction shall be discussed in the permit applications and avoidance and minimization measures shall be proposed, including timing of construction to avoid presence of steelhead and Chinook salmon, fish rescue and relocation, as well as specific BMPs to avoid impacts to these species and their habitat. The permit requirements shall include the following elements:
• In-water construction work windows shall be observed in consultation with NMFS and CDFW, and as specified in the permits issued.

Protect Central Valley steelhead and winterrun and spring-run Chinook salmon as described in Mitigation Measures 3.4-8(b).

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
572

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-18 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party • Applicant(s) shall implement a pile driving, dewatering and fish rescue plan.

The plan shall include specific measures to avoid and minimize impacts to salmonids and their habitats during bridge construction, and shall be approved by NMFS and CDFW.
3) Install Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) fences within 200 feet of work along Auburn Ravine, as indicated in the 401 or 404 permits. The ESA fencing shall be delineated on the final plans for each project phase and the fence shall be installed and remain on-site until construction within 200 feet of the Auburn Ravine preserve area is completed.
4) Implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1 and construction best management practices (BMPs) as prescribed in the project’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared in accordance with the California National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, NPDES No. CAR000002). These BMPs shall be in place throughout the construction for each project phase. The SWPPP shall include specific measures for water conservation; vehicle and equipment cleaning, fueling and maintenance; dewatering; paving and grinding; concrete finishing and curing; directing water away from work areas; use of attachments on construction equipment to catch debris; use of approved covers or platforms to collect debris; stockpiling of accumulated debris and waste generated during demolition away from watercourses; and ensuring safe passage of wildlife, as necessary.

3.4-9: Implementation of the
proposed project could have a
substantial adverse effect on riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural
communities identified in local, state,
or federal plans, policies, or
regulations.

3.4-9:
a) If the PCCP has been adopted and approved prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the The project applicant(s) shall comply with the PCCP and mitigate for impacts to and loss of sensitive natural communities as stated in the PCCP. Mitigation achieved through implementation of the PCCP shall be equal to or greater than the mitigation ratios and requirements described in subsection (b), below.

Use PCCP to satisfy all biological mitigation
measures under CEQA.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Following PCCP adoption
and approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
b) If the PCCP is not in operation has not been adopted and approved prior to the start of construction in the V5SP area in question, the project applicant(s) shall comply with Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3,

3.4-4, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,
and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,
and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,
and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, and 3.10-1.

3.4-11: Implementation of the
proposed project could conflict with
the provisions of approved local,
regional or state policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance.

3.4-11:
a) For impacts to threatened or endangered vegetation, the project applicant(s) shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, 3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4 9, and 3.10-1 as applicable.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3,

3.4-4, 3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8, 3.4 9, and

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,

3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4-9, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,

3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4 9, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4,

3.4-5, 3.4-6, 3.4-7, 3.4-8,

3.4 9, and 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, 3.4-3, 3.4-4, 3.4-5, 3.4-6,

3.4-7, 3.4-8, 3.4 9, and 3.10-1.
b) For impacts to heritage oak trees, the project applicant(s) shall first make every reasonable attempt to avoid any heritage oak tree by designing around it. If a heritage oak tree cannot be avoided due to health, safety, and welfare risks, the project applicant(s) shall provide the following mitigation:
i. Submit a justification statement as to why the heritage tree(s) cannot be preserved in place to the City’s Community Development Director. ii. Provide a Site Plan with proposed development which also identifies the location of the heritage tree(s) to be removed.

Protect heritage oak trees by making every
reasonable attempt, and if inevitable, submit
a justification statement to the City’s
Community Development Director, identify
oak trees to be removed on the site plan,
and replace oak trees inch by inch.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
iii. If the Community Development Director deems the justification statement to be valid, the project applicant(s) shall mitigate the loss of heritage oak trees on an inch for inch basis. Specifically, for every inch of heritage oak tree removed, an inch of oak tree shall be planted. All new plantings shall be plantings in a minimum of 15 gallon pots, and shall be of the same species of oak as was being removed and replaced, and shall, if feasible, be located on the property from which the heritage oak tree was removed. Project applicant(s) shall submit to the City’s Community Development Director a revegetation plan for his/her review and approval. The project applicant(s) shall irrigate and maintain the new plantings for a minimum of three years, at which time a licensed arborist shall opine as to whether the trees are sufficiently established to release the project applicant(s) from continuing to irrigate and maintain the plantings. Any replacement trees which die before the end of the irrigation and maintenance obligations shall be replaced at a 1:1 ratio.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
573

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-19 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.4-13: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
a cumulative substantial adverse
effect on federally protected wetlands
defined by Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act through direct removal,
placement of fill, hydrological
interruption, or by other means and
would result in fill of jurisdictional
wetlands or other protected waters.

3.4-13:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-1.

3.4-14: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss and/or degradation of
vernal pool habitat, and the loss of
special-status vernal pool
crustaceans or amphibians.

3.4-14:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, and

3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, and 3.4-3.

3.4-15: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss and/or degradation of
rare plant populations.

3.4-15:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and 3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3,
and 3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and

3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and

3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-1, 3.4-2, 3.4-3, and

3.4-4.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-1,

3.4-2, 3.4-3, and 3.4-4.

3.4-16: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss of western pond
turtle and/or degradation of potential
habitat.

3.4-16:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-5. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-5.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-5.

3.4-17: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss or disturbance of
nesting birds and the loss or
degradation of special-status bird
habitat.

3.4-17:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-6. See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-6.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2
and 3.4-6.

3.4-18: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative loss of valley elderberry
longhorn beetle and/or degradation of
potential habitat.

3.4-18:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-7. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-7.

3.4-19: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative changes to surface water
quality in Auburn Ravine that could
affect Central Valley steelhead and
Chinook salmon due to the widening
or construction of bridges within
western Placer County.

3.4-19:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-8. See Mitigation Measure

3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure

3.4-8.

See Mitigation Measure 3.4-8.

3.4-20: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
a cumulative substantial adverse
effect on riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural communities
identified in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations or by CDFW
or USFWS.

3.4-20:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2 and 3.4-9. See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures

3.4-2 and 3.4-9.

See Mitigation Measures 3.4-2
and 3.4-9.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
574

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-20 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.5 Climate Change

3.5-1: Construction and operation of
the proposed project would result in a
cumulatively considerable increase in
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
that could conflict with an applicable
plan, policy or regulation of an
appropriate regulatory agency
adopted for the purpose of reducing
GHG emissions.

3.5-1:

The following mitigation measures are based on measures identified by the project applicant, by the PCAPCD, by the California Attorney General, and by CAPCOA. The following measures focus primarily on non-transportation energy efficiency. Measures associated with reducing transportation emissions have already been incorporated into the GHG emission estimates shown in Table 3.5-1. The following measures will ensure that all Title 24 requirements are met and will further reduce GHG emissions through energy efficiency improvements.

All residential buildings shall:
• Meet or exceed CalGreen Tier 2 requirements in place at the time of Building Permit issuance.
• Be pre-plumbed and structurally engineered for the future installation of a complete solar energy system.
• Include a tankless water heating system, a whole house ceiling fan, and “Energy Star” appliances (stoves, dishwashers, and any other appliances typically included within the initial installation by the builder).
• Include an energy efficient air conditioning unit(s) that exceeds the SEER ratio by a minimum of two points at the time of building permit issuance. • Include programmable thermostat timers.
• Include exterior outlets on all single-family and multi-family buildings to allow the use of electrically-powered landscape equipment.
• Include wiring for at least one electric car charging station. • Meet the 2016 Plumbing Code on all residences to reduce indoor and outdoor water use in installing low-flow bathroom faucets, kitchen faucets, toilets, and showers, and landscaping that uses water-efficient, drought resistant plants, and water-saving irrigation systems. Additionally, all residential units shall be pre-plumbed to enable the reuse of graywater systems.
• Not include wood-burning fireplaces, woodstoves, and other similar wood-burning devices. This prohibition shall be included in any covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) that are established.
• Provide covered storage facilities for securing bicycles for 15 percent or more of building occupants (multi-family housing units).
• Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the applicant shall establish tree planting guidelines that require residents to plant trees to shade buildings primarily on the west and south sides of buildings. Recommended use of deciduous trees (to allow solar gain during the winter) and direct shading of air conditioning systems shall be included in the guidelines.

Meet all Title 24 requirements. Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to construction Placer County Air Pollution District, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
All non-residential structures within the Plan Area shall:
• Be pre-plumbed and structurally engineered for the future installation of a complete solar energy system.
• Install photovoltaic rooftop energy systems on all community buildings and any commercial buildings over 100,000 square feet.
• Use “Energy Star” rated (or greater) roofing materials. • Use both indoor and outdoor energy efficient lighting that meets or exceeds Title 24 requirements.
• Include an energy efficient heating system and an air conditioning system that exceeds the SEER ratio by a minimum of two points at the time of building permit issuance.
• Only use low flow water fixtures such as low flow toilets, faucets, showers, etc. • Only use programmable thermostat timers.
• Include enough bike parking facilities to meet peak demand. Bike parking shall also be included near all transit locations that are developed during the course of this Plan. This will include providing secure bicycle racks and/or storage within 200 yards of a building entrance for five percent or more of all Full Time Equivalent (FTE) staff (measured at peak periods) and provide showers and changing facilities in the Attachment 10 Exhibit B
575

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-21 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party building, or within 200 yards of a primary staff building entrance, for 0.5 percent of FTE staff (measured at peak periods), or
• Provide secure bike racks and/or storage within 200 yards of a public building entrance according to the following guidelines based on project square footage:
• Up to 5,000 square feet, two or more bicycle racks,
• 5,001 – 20,000 square feet, three or more bicycle racks, • 20,001 – 50,000 square feet, six or more bicycle racks, • More than 50,000 square feet, ten or more bicycle racks. • Install two 110/208 volt power outlets for every two loading docks. • Reserve a minimum of five percent of the total customer parking spaces within commercial and retail parking lots for electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles, alternative fueled vehicles, and carpools.
• Install electric vehicle charging stations for a minimum of three percent of the total vehicle parking capacity of the site.
• Include pedestrian-friendly paths and cross walks in all parking lots. • Pave all parking lots with reflective coatings (albedo = 0.30 or better). This measure is considered feasible if the additional cost is less than 10 percent of the cost of applying a standard asphalt product.

In addition to the above measures, the following shall also be incorporated:
• Prior to project approval, the applicant shall only show energy efficient lighting for all street, parking, and area lighting associated with the V5SP. The applicant shall also work to limit the hours of operation of outdoor lights through the use of timers and/or motion sensors, to the extent that these strategies do not compromise public safety. • Any new park areas within the Plan Area shall include bicycle racks at appropriate locations and a community notice board and information kiosk within information about community events, ridesharing, and commute alternatives. • Prior to issue of an occupancy permit within the Plan Area, the applicant shall create informational materials informing occupants of the alternative travel amenities provided, including ridesharing and public transit availability schedules and the Plan Area’s pedestrian bicycle, and equestrian paths to community centers, shopping areas, employment areas, schools, parks, and recreation areas. • Maximize the amount of drought tolerant landscaping by minimizing the amount of turf in all areas where this option is feasible.

3.6 Cultural Resources

3.6-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would adversely
impact historic architectural
resources directly through demolition
or substantial alteration, or indirectly
through changes to historical setting.

3.6-1:

When project-level development plans outside of Area A or Windsor Cove are submitted to the City of Lincoln for approval, the project proponent shall be required to complete a cultural resources investigation for review and approval by the City that includes, at a minimum:
• An updated records search at the North Central Information Center; • An intensive cultural resources survey, documenting and evaluating resources 45 years or older within and adjacent to the project footprint for listing in the California or National Registers;
• A report disseminating the results of this research; and, • Recommendations for additional mitigation to resolve adverse impacts to recorded cultural resources.

The survey shall be carried out by a qualified historian or architectural historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Architectural History, and can be compiled in the same document as Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(a). Demolition or substantial alteration of all previously recorded historic resources, including significant historic resources encountered during the survey and evaluation efforts, shall be avoided. Any alterations, including relocation, to historic buildings or structures shall conform to the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing Historic Buildings. If avoidance of identified historic resources is deemed infeasible, the City shall prepare a treatment Complete a cultural resources investigation. Full Specific Plan, apart from Area A and Windsor
Cove
Project applicant Prior to project-level
development plan submittal
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
576

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-22 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party plan to include, but not limited to, adaptive reuse, photo-documentation and public interpretation of the resource.

If avoidance, adaptive reuse, or relocation of an historic resource is determined infeasible, a qualified architectural historian shall be retained to document the affected historic resource in accordance with the National Park Service’s Historic American Buildings Survey (HABS) and/or Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) standards. Such standards typically include large format photography using (4x5) negatives, written data, and copies of original plans if available. The HABS/HAER documentation packages shall be archived at local libraries and historical repositories, as well as the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System. Public interpretation of historic resources at their original site shall also occur in the form of a plaque, kiosk or other method of describing the building’s historic or architectural importance to the general public. These mitigation actions will be undertaken at the developer’s expense.

3.6-2: Implementation of the
proposed project could result in
damage or destruction of known or
previously unidentified unique
archaeological resources.

3.6-2(a):

When project-level development plans outside of Area A or Windsor Cove are submitted to the City of Lincoln for approval, the project proponent shall be required to complete a cultural resources investigation for review and approval by the City that includes, at a minimum:
• An updated records search at the North Central Information Center; • An intensive cultural resources survey, including subsurface presence/absence studies as appropriate;
• Contact and coordination with the Native American Heritage Commission and interested and involved local tribes;
• A report disseminating the results of this research that evaluates the eligibility of recorded resources for inclusion in the National and California Registers; and, • Recommendations for additional cultural resources investigations necessary to mitigate adverse impacts to recorded and/or undiscovered archaeological resources.

Complete a cultural resources investigation. Full Specific Plan, apart from Area A and Windsor
Cove
Project applicant During plan submittal City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Additional cultural resources investigations may include testing and evaluation of archaeological resources, as well as data recovery efforts. If a significant unique archaeological resource is present that could be adversely impacted by a project, the project proponent shall:
a) In consultation with the lead agency and archaeologist, determine if preservation in place is feasible. Consistent with State CEQA Guidelines section 15126.4(b)(3), this may be accomplished through planning construction to avoid the resource; incorporating the resource within open space; capping and covering the resource; or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement; or b) Design and implement an Archaeological Research Design and Treatment Plan (ARDTP). If avoidance is not feasible, the project proponent shall hire a Secretary of the Interior-qualified archaeological consultant who shall prepare a draft ARDTP that shall be submitted to the City of Lincoln for review and approval. The ARDTP shall identify how the proposed data recovery program would preserve the significant information the archaeological resource is expected to contain. Treatment of unique archaeological resources shall follow the applicable requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21083.2. Treatment for most resources would consist of (but would not be not limited to) sample excavation, artifact collection, site documentation, and historical research, with the aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of the significant resource to be impacted by the project. The ARDTP shall include provisions for analysis of data in a regional context, reporting of results within a timely manner and subject to review and comments by the appropriate Native American representative before being finalized, curation of artifacts and data at a local facility acceptable to the appropriate Native American representative, and dissemination of final confidential reports to the appropriate Native American representative, the Northwest Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System, the City, and interested professionals.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
577

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-23 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.6-2(b):

Before the start of grading or excavation activities, construction personnel involved with earth-moving activities shall be informed of the possibility of encountering archaeological resources, the appearance and types of resources likely to be seen during construction activities, and the proper notification procedures to follow should archaeological resources be encountered. This worker training shall be prepared and presented by a qualified archaeologist.

If archaeological resources are discovered during earth-moving activities, the requirements of General Plan Policy OSC‐6.7 (Discovery of Archaeological/ Paleontological Resources) shall be followed, as described herein. In the event of accidental discovery during construction, all work must halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery if subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin are discovered during construction. A qualified professional archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeologist shall be retained to evaluate the significance of the find, and shall have the authority to modify the no-work radius as appropriate, using professional judgment. A Native American monitor, following the Guidelines for Monitors/Consultants of Native American Cultural, Religious, and Burial Sites established by the NAHC, will be required if the nature of the unanticipated discovery is prehistoric.

Work cannot continue within the no-work radius until the archaeologist conducts sufficient research and data collection to make a determination that the resource is either 1) not cultural in origin; or 2) not potentially significant or eligible for listing on the California or National Registers.

If a potentially eligible resource is encountered, then the lead agency shall require the project proponent to arrange for either 1) total avoidance of the resource, if feasible or 2) test excavations to evaluate eligibility and, if eligible, potentially data recovery as mitigation. The determination shall be formally documented in writing and submitted to the lead agency as verification that the provisions in CEQA for managing unanticipated discoveries have been met. Curation of any identified resources would be determined through consultation between the archaeologist, project proponent, and lead agency during the course of analysis.

Inform construction personnel about the
possibility of archaeological resource
discovery during construction.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Before grading or
excavation
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.6-3: Ground-disturbing construction
associated with implementation of the
proposed project could result in
disturbance or destruction of a
paleontological resource.

3.6-3:

Before the start of grading or excavation activities, construction personnel involved with earth-moving activities shall be informed of the possibility of encountering fossils, the appearance and types of fossils likely to be seen during construction activities, and the proper notification procedures to follow should fossils be encountered. This worker training shall be prepared and presented by a qualified paleontologist.

Inform construction personnel about the
possibility of fossil discovery during
construction.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
Windsor Cove
Project applicant Before grading or
excavation
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
If paleontological resources are discovered during earth-moving activities the following requirements of General Plan Policy OSC‐6.7 (Discovery of Archaeological/Paleontological Resources) will be followed: the construction crew shall immediately cease work and the Planning Department shall be notified immediately if any paleontological resources (e.g., fossils) are uncovered during construction. All construction must stop in within 100 feet of the find and a paleontologist shall be retained to evaluate the resource and prepare and implement a proposed mitigation plan, including curation, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines.

3.6-4: Ground-disturbing activities
associated with construction of the
proposed project could result in
damage to previously unidentified
human remains.

3.6-4:
a) Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b). See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b).
b) In the event that evidence of human remains is discovered, the following requirements of General Plan Policy OSC‐6.10 (Discovery of Human Remains) shall be followed. Construction activities within any area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent human remains shall be halted or diverted. In addition, the provisions of Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code (PRC), and Assembly Bill (AB) 2641 shall be implemented. Specifically, the discovery shall be reported to the County Coroner (Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code) and reasonable protection measures be taken during construction to protect the discovery from disturbance (AB 2641). If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner will notify the NAHC which will then designates a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the project (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). The designated MLD then has 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains (AB 2641). If the landowner does not agree with Follow Lincoln General Plan Policy OSC6.10 in the event of discovery of human remains.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant During construction Native American Heritage Commission, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
578

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-24 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (Section 5097.94 of the PRC). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not be further disturbed (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). The United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC) Tribal Council shall be solicited their input as part of the mitigation process.

3.6-5: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would result in significant
cumulative impacts on historic
architectural resources.

3.6-5:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-1.

3.6-6: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would not result in
significant cumulative impacts on
unique archaeological resources.

3.6-6:

Implement Mitigation Measures 3.6-2(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measures 3.6-2(a) and

3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures

3.6-2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures

3.6-2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures

3.6-2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

See Mitigation Measures 3.6-
2(a) and 3.6-2(b).

3.6-7: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would not result in
significant cumulative impacts on
paleontological resources.

3.6-7:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-3.

3.6-8: The proposed project, in
conjunction with past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future
projects, would not result in
significant cumulative impacts on
human remains.

3.6-8:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b) and Mitigation Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure 3.6-2(b) and
Mitigation Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and
(b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.6-2(b) and Mitigation
Measure 3.6-4(a) and (b).

3.7 Energy

3.7-1: Construction of the proposed
project would not use fuel and energy
in an unnecessary, wasteful, or
inefficient manner during project
construction.

3.7-1:

The applicant(s) shall implement the following mitigation measures for each phase of development in the time frames provided:
a) The prime contractor shall submit to the District a comprehensive inventory (i.e., make, model, year, emission rating) of all the heavy-duty off-road equipment (50 horsepower or greater) that will be used an aggregate of 40 or more hours for the construction project. If any new equipment is added after submission of the inventory, the prime contractor shall contact the District prior to the new equipment being utilized. At least three business days prior to the use of subject heavy-duty offroad equipment, the project representative shall provide the District with the anticipated construction timeline including start date, name, and phone number of the property owner, project manager, and on-site foreman.

Prior to approval of grading or improvement plans, (whichever occurs first), the applicant(s) shall provide a written calculation to the District for approval demonstrating that the heavy-duty (> 50 horsepower) off-road vehicles to be used in the construction project, including owned, leased and subcontractor vehicles, will meet Tier 4 emission standards or the equivalent Tier standards established by the State in place at the time of construction. If Tier 4 equipment is unavailable for any equipment type, the prime contractor shall notify the PCAPCD that Tier 3 off-road equipment will be utilized.
c) During construction, the contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., electricity) or clean fuel (e.g., propane, gasoline, biodiesel, and/or natural gas) generators rather than temporary diesel power generators, to the degree feasible. d) During construction, the contractor shall minimize idling time to a maximum of 5 minutes for all diesel-powered equipment.

Provide inventory of construction vehicles
and equipment and calculations, utilize
existing power sources and clean fuel to the
degree feasible, minimize idling time to five
minutes, provide sign indicating idle time
limit, and maintain all construction
equipment in working condition.

V5SP and Area A Project applicant During each corresponding phase of development
Placer County Air Pollution
District, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
579

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-25 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party e) Signs shall be posted in the designated queuing areas of the construction site to limit idling to a maximum of 5 minutes.
f) Maintain all construction equipment in proper working condition according to manufacturer’s specifications. The equipment must be checked by a certified mechanic and determine to be running in proper condition before it is operated

3.8 Geology, Soils, and Seismicity

3.8-2: The proposed project would
not result in substantial soil erosion
or the loss of topsoil.

3.8-2(a):

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1(a) and (b).
a) Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City Public Works Department and CVRWQB, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) detailing measures to control soil erosion and waste discharges during construction. The SWPPP shall include an erosion control and restoration plan, a water quality monitoring plan, a hazardous materials management plan, and post-construction BMPs. The BMPs shall be maintained until all areas disturbed during maintenance have been adequately stabilized.

Prior to the commencement of any construction activities (as they are phased), including grading, the project applicant shall submit of a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Water Resources Control Board for coverage under the 2012-0006-DWQ Permit.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1(a) and (b). See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1(a) and (b).
i. The specific BMPs that would be incorporated into the SWPPP shall be determined during the final stages of the proposed Project design. The SWPPP shall include specific practices to minimize the potential that pollutants will leave the site during construction. Such practices include establishing designated equipment staging areas, minimizing disturbance of soils and existing vegetation, protection of spoils and soil stockpile areas, and equipment exclusion zones prior to the commencement of any construction activity; designating equipment washout areas; and establishing proper vehicle fuel and maintenance practices. ii. The applicant shall require contractors using and/or storing hazardous materials, such as vehicle fuels and lubricants, to do so in designated staging areas located away from surface waters according to local, state, and federal regulations as applicable.
iii. All contractors conducting maintenance-related work shall be required to prepare and implement a SWPPP to control soil erosion and waste discharges of other maintenance-related contaminants. The general contractor and subcontractor(s) conducting the work shall be responsible for preparing or implementing the SWPPP, regularly inspecting measures, and maintaining the BMPs in good working order. Maintenance vehicles and equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and shall be properly maintained to prevent contamination of soil or water from external grease and oil or from leaking hydraulic fluid, fuel, oil, and grease. iv. Methods and materials used for herbicide and pesticide application shall be in accordance with label directions, DWR’s most current guidelines on herbicide and pesticide use, and with laws and regulations administered by the Department of Pesticide Regulation.
v. Prior to approval of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall cause the preparation of and implementation of a Spill Prevention and Control Plan (SPCP). The SPCP shall be accessible on site at all times prior to initiation of maintenance activities, and throughout the activities. The SPCP shall identify the spill control materials that must be fully stocked on site at all times and include a plan for the emergency cleanup of any spills of fuel or other materials that may be released. Maintenance Yard staff shall be provided the necessary information from the SPCP to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters prior to commencement of construction activities and provide all necessary protocols to contain any spill that might occur. Any such spills, and the cleanup efforts, shall be reported by the on site contractor in an incident report to Placer County Environmental Health as the Certified Unified Program Agency or as directed by Environmental Health.
vi. Any in-water work shall be conducted in accordance with requirements as contained in the Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404 permits, California Fish and Game Code section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, and any other applicable regulatory permits or agreements.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
580

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-26 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party b) Prior to approval of final improvement plans, the project applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that meets all the requirements described below. i. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include the proposed water quality facilities and shall be prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.400 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. The Water Quality Management Plan shall be consistent with goals and standards established under federal and state non-point source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations, the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan. ii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a description of all nonstructural BMPs and include Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), or similar regulatory mechanism, to enforce implementation of non-structural BMPs.

Non-structural BMPs shall include, but not be limited to, “good housekeeping” practices for materials storage and waste management, storm drain system stenciling, landscape chemical use guidelines, and street sweeping. iii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities during project operation, which the City shall consider and implement. iv. All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual adopted by the City for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based postconstruction BMPs shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs and shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the Section 10, Drainage, of the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and the Placer County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s Stormwater Management Manual. All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the proposed project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs.
v. To comply with the requirements of the Placer County Mosquito and Vector Control District, all BMPs shall be designed to discharge all waters within 96 hours of the completion of runoff from a storm event. All graded areas must drain so that no standing water can accumulate for more than 96 hours within water quality facilities.
vi. Stormwater runoff from the proposed project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment, oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. Examples of these BMPs include, but are not limited to, grass strips, bioretention, bioswales, composite/treatment train BMPs, detention basins (surface/grass-lined), media filters (mostly sand filters), porous pavement, retention ponds (surface pond with a permanent pool), wetland basins (basins with open water surface), a combined category including both retention ponds and wetland basins, and wetland channels (swales and channels with wetland vegetation). The Water Quality Plan shall include plans for the maintenance of proposed BMPs. No water quality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
581

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-27 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials

3.9-2: The proposed project could
create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into
the environment.

3.9-2:
a) Prior to final project design or if none is required, any earth-disturbing activities at the project site, the City shall require that the applicant conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) areas that are not already evaluated in an existing Phase I ESA. The Phase I ESA shall be prepared by a Registered Environmental Assessor (REA) or other qualified professional to assess the potential for contaminated soil or groundwater conditions at the project site. The Phase I ESA shall include a review of appropriate federal and State hazardous materials databases, as well as relevant local hazardous material site databases for hazardous waste on-site and off-site locations within a one-quarter mile radius of the area of analysis. The Phase I ESA shall also include a review of existing or past land uses and aerial photographs, summary of results of reconnaissance site visit(s), and review of other relevant existing information that could identify the potential existence of contaminated soil or groundwater. If no contaminated soil or groundwater is identified, or the Phase I ESA does not recommend any further investigation, then no further action is required.

Conduct a Phase I ESA for all other areas
not yet evaluated.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
b) If existing hazardous materials contamination is identified during the execution of Mitigation Measure 3.9-2(a), and the future Phase I ESA recommends further review, the applicant shall retain an REA to conduct follow-up sampling to characterize the contamination and to identify any required remediation that shall be conducted, consistent with applicable regulations prior to any earth-disturbing activities. The environmental professional shall prepare a report that includes, but is not limited to, activities performed for the assessment, a summary of anticipated contaminants and contaminant concentrations at the proposed construction site, and recommendations for appropriate handling of any contaminated materials during construction. These recommendations shall be implemented and the site shall be deemed remediated by the appropriate agency (e.g., DTSC, PCDEHS) or the County shall issue a No Further Action (NFA) letter prior to earth disturbance continuing in the vicinity of the contamination.

Conduct a follow-up study in the event that
further review is needed.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
c) If unidentified or suspected contaminated soil or groundwater (stained soil, noxious odors) is encountered during site preparation or construction activities, work shall stop in the area of potential contamination, and the type and extent of contamination shall be identified by an REA or qualified professional. The REA or qualified professional shall prepare a report that includes, but is not limited to, activities performed for the assessment, summary of anticipated contaminants and contaminant concentrations, and recommendations for appropriate handling and disposal. Site preparation or construction activities shall not recommence within the contaminated areas until remediation is complete and a “no further action” letter is obtained from the applicable regulatory agency.

Stop work in the event hazardous materials
are found.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.9-4: The proposed project could be
located on a site which is included on
a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government
Code Section 65962.5 (Cortese List)
and, as a result, create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment.

3.9-4(a):

During construction, the contractor shall cease any earthwork activities upon discovery of any suspect soils or groundwater (e.g., petroleum odor and/or discoloration) during construction in accordance with a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan prepared for the project by a qualified environmental consultant and approved by the Placer County Department of Environmental Health Services (PCDEHS). The contractor shall notify the PCDEHS upon discovery of suspect soils or groundwater and retain a qualified environmental firm to collect soil and/or groundwater samples to confirm the level of contamination that may be present. If contamination is found to be present, any further proposed groundbreaking activities within areas of identified or suspected contamination shall be conducted according to a site specific health and safety plan, prepared by a California state licensed professional. Any contaminants identified as exceeding human health risk levels, shall be delineated, removed, and disposed of offsite in compliance with the receiving facilities requirements under the direction of PCDEHS. The contractor shall follow all procedural direction given by PCDEHS and in accordance with the Soil and Groundwater Management Plan prepared for the site to ensure that suspect soils are isolated, protected from runoff, and disposed of in accordance with Section 31303 of the California Vehicle Code and the requirements of the licensed receiving facility.

Stop work in the event suspect soils or
groundwater is found.

Full Specific Plan, Area A,
and Windsor Cove
Project contractor During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
582

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-28 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.9-4(b):

Conduct a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment on the Morse Property at 200 South Dowd Road (APN 021-081-008) in order to sample the underlying soil beneath a concrete saddle that formerly supported an above ground diesel tank and the footprint of a former barn that included an above ground gasoline tank. Follow the recommendations in the Phase II ESA.

Conduct a Phase II ESA. Windsor Cove Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.9-6: The proposed project would
not result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the
project area for a project within the
vicinity of a private airstrip.

3.9-6:

Prior to issuance of the first building permit within 500 feet of the airstrip, the project applicant shall purchase and/or relocate the easement and upon purchase or relocation, abandon the airstrip by filing the appropriate documentation with the Placer County Recorder’s Office.

Purchase and/or relocate airstrip easement. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to building permit
issuance
Placer County Recorder’s
Office, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department

3.9-7: The proposed project could
impair implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency
evacuation plan.

3.9-7:

Prior to construction, the applicant for any phase of construction shall require the construction contractor(s) to prepare and enforce a traffic control plan to minimize traffic impacts on all roadways at and near the work site affected by construction activities. This traffic control plan shall reduce potential traffic safety hazards and ensure adequate access for emergency responders. The applicant and construction contractor(s) shall coordinate development and implementation of this traffic control plan with the City of Lincoln, as appropriate. To the extent applicable, this traffic control plan shall conform to the 2014 California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Part 6 (Temporary Traffic Control). The traffic control plan shall provide, but not be limited to, the following elements:
• Circulation and detour plans to minimize impacts on local road circulation during road and lane closures. Flaggers and/or signage shall be used to guide vehicles through and/or around the construction zone.
• Identifying truck routes designated by Placer County, where applicable. Haul routes that minimize truck traffic on local roadways shall be utilized to the extent possible. • Sufficient staging areas for trucks accessing construction zones to minimize the disruption of access to adjacent existing public right-of-ways. • Controlling and monitoring construction vehicle movement through the enforcement of standard construction specifications by onsite inspectors. • Scheduling truck trips outside the peak morning and evening commute hours to the extent possible.
• Limiting the duration of road and lane closures to the extent possible. • Storing all equipment and materials in designated contractor staging areas on or adjacent to the worksite, such that traffic obstruction is minimized. • Implementing roadside safety protocols. Advance “Road Work Ahead” warning and speed control signs (including those informing drivers of State legislated double fines for speed infractions in a construction zone) shall be posted to reduce speeds and provide safe traffic flow through the work zone.
• Coordinating construction administrators of police and fire stations (including all fire protection agencies). Operators shall be notified in advance of the timing, location, and duration of construction activities and the locations of detours and lane closures, where applicable.
• Repairing and restoring affected roadway rights-of way to their original condition after construction is completed.

Prepare and enforce a traffic control plan. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.9-14: The proposed project,
combined with other cumulative
development, could impair the
implementation of or physically
interference with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan.

3.9-14:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-7. See Mitigation Measure

3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure

3.9-7.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-7.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
583

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-29 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.10 Hydrology

3.10-1: Implementation of the
proposed project could violate water
quality standards or waste discharge
requirements.

3.10-1(a):

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan – Project Construction Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant shall prepare and submit to the City Public Works Department and CVRWQCB, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) detailing measures to control soil erosion and waste discharges during construction. The SWPPP shall include an erosion control and restoration plan, a water quality monitoring plan, a hazardous materials management plan, and post-construction BMPs. The BMPs shall be maintained until all areas disturbed during maintenance have been adequately stabilized.

Prior to the commencement of any construction activities (as they are phased), including grading, the project applicant shall submit of a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Water Resources Control Board for coverage under the 2012-0006-DWQ Permit. i. The specific BMPs that would be incorporated into the SWPPP shall be determined during the final stages of the proposed Project design. The SWPPP shall include specific practices to minimize the potential that pollutants will leave the site during construction. Such practices include establishing designated equipment staging areas, minimizing disturbance of soils and existing vegetation, protection of spoils and soil stockpile areas, and equipment exclusion zones prior to the commencement of any construction activity; designating equipment washout areas; and establishing proper vehicle fuel and maintenance practices.
ii. The applicant shall require contractors using and/or storing hazardous materials, such as vehicle fuels and lubricants, to do so in designated staging areas located away from surface waters according to local, state, and federal regulations as applicable.
iii. All contractors conducting maintenance-related work shall be required to prepare and implement a SWPPP to control soil erosion and waste discharges of other maintenance-related contaminants. The general contractor and subcontractor(s) conducting the work shall be responsible for preparing or implementing the SWPPP, regularly inspecting measures, and maintaining the BMPs in good working order.

Maintenance vehicles and equipment shall be checked daily for leaks and shall be properly maintained to prevent contamination of soil or water from external grease and oil or from leaking hydraulic fluid, fuel, oil, and grease. iv. Methods and materials used for herbicide and pesticide application shall be in accordance with label directions, DWR’s most current guidelines on herbicide and pesticide use, and with laws and regulations administered by the Department of Pesticide Regulation.

Prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the City Public
Works Department and the Central Valley,
and submit a Notice of Intent to the State
Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to grading permit
issuance for SWPPP, and
prior to phased construction
for NOI
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department and Central Valley
Regional Water Quality Control
Board (CVRWQCB) for
SWPPP and State Water
Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) for NOI
v. Prior to approval of a grading or building permit, the applicant shall cause the preparation of and implementation of a Spill Prevention and Control Plan (SPCP).

The SPCP shall be accessible on site at all times prior to initiation of maintenance activities, and throughout the activities. The SPCP shall identify the spill control materials that must be fully stocked on site at all times and include a plan for the emergency cleanup of any spills of fuel or other materials that may be released.

Maintenance Yard staff shall be provided the necessary information from the SPCP to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters prior to commencement of construction activities and provide all necessary protocols to contain any spill that might occur. Any such spills, and the cleanup efforts, shall be reported by the on site contractor in an incident report to Placer County Environmental Health as the Certified Unified Program Agency or as directed by Environmental Health. vi. Any in-water work shall be conducted in accordance with requirements as contained in the Clean Water Act Section 401 and 404 permits, California Fish and Game Code section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, and any other applicable regulatory permits or agreements.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
584

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-30 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.10-1(b):

Water Quality BMPs – Project Operation
Prior to approval of final improvement plans, the project applicant shall prepare a Water Quality Management Plan that meets all the requirements described below. i. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include the proposed water quality facilities and shall be prepared in accordance with Section 8.60.400 of the City’s Municipal Code for City review and approval. The Water Quality Management Plan shall be consistent with goals and standards established under federal and state non-point source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System regulations, the Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River Basin and San Joaquin River Basin water quality objectives, the City’s Post-Construction Stormwater Runoff Control Ordinance, and Low-Impact Development (LID) alternatives for stormwater quality control per Public Facilities and Services Implementation Measure 3.0 of the adopted 2050 General Plan.
ii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a description of all non-structural BMPs and include Covenants, Codes, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), or similar regulatory mechanism, to enforce implementation of non-structural BMPs. Nonstructural BMPs shall include, but not be limited to, “good housekeeping” practices for materials storage and waste management, storm drain system stenciling, landscape chemical use guidelines, and street sweeping. iii. The Water Quality Management Plan shall also include the method or methods for funding the long-term maintenance of the proposed water quality facilities during project operation, which the City shall consider and implement. iv. All BMPs for water quality protection, source control, and treatment control shall be developed in accordance with the Stormwater Quality Design Manual adopted by the City for the project. The BMPs shall be designed to mitigate (minimize, infiltrate, filter, or treat) stormwater runoff. Flow or volume based post-construction BMPs shall be included for long-term maintenance of BMPs and shall be designed at a minimum in accordance with the Section 10, Drainage, of the City of Lincoln Design Criteria and Procedures Manual and the Placer County Flood Control and Water Conservation District’s Stormwater Management Manual. All BMPs shall reflect the Best Available Technologies (BAT) available at the time of implementation and shall reflect site-specific limitations. The City shall make the final determinations as to the appropriateness of the BMPs proposed for the proposed project and the City shall ensure future implementation, operation, and maintenance of the BMPs. v. To comply with the requirements of the Placer County Mosquito and Vector Control District, all BMPs shall be designed to discharge all waters within 96 hours of the completion of runoff from a storm event. All graded areas must drain so that no standing water can accumulate for more than 96 hours within water quality facilities. vi. Stormwater runoff from the proposed project’s impervious surfaces (including roads) shall be collected and routed through specially designed water quality treatment facilities (BMPs) for removal of pollutants of concern (i.e. sediment, oil/grease, etc.), as approved by the City. Examples of these BMPs include, but are not limited to, grass strips, bioretention, bioswales, composite/treatment train BMPs, detention basins (surface/grass-lined), media filters (mostly sand filters), porous pavement, retention ponds (surface pond with a permanent pool), wetland basins (basins with open water surface), a combined category including both retention ponds and wetland basins, and wetland channels (swales and channels with wetland vegetation). The Water Quality Plan shall include plans for the maintenance of proposed BMPs. No water quality facility construction shall be permitted within any identified wetlands area, floodplain, or right-of-way, except as authorized by project approvals.

Prepare a Water Quality Management Plan. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to final improvement
plan approval
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.10-3: Implementation of the
proposed project could substantially
alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result
in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site.

3.10-3:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
585

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-31 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.10-4: Implementation of the
proposed project would substantially
alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or
river, or substantially increase the
rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner which could result in flooding
on- or off-site.

3.10-4:

The project applicant(s) shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1and demonstrate that the final design of the onsite drainage improvements will comply with the requirements established in the V5 Drainage Master Plan.

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1 and
demonstrate that final design of the
drainage components will be compliant with
the Village 5 Drainage Master Plan.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

City of Lincoln Public Works
Department, City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department

3.10-5: Implementation of the
proposed project could create or
contribute runoff water which would
provide substantial additional sources
of polluted runoff.

3.10-5:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

3.10-7: Implementation of the
proposed project could place within a
100-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard
Boundary, Flood Insurance Rate
Map, or other flood hazard
delineation map, or within a 200-year
floodplain, housing or structures
which would impede or redirect flood
flows.

3.10-7:

Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall demonstrate to the City of Lincoln that it has received an encroachment permit from the Central Valley Flood Protection Board (CVFPB) for construction to be located within the 100-year and 200- year flood zone, and any other necessary state or federal permits. As part of the CVFPB permit process, the project applicant must demonstrate that the proposed improvements including storm drain outfalls and bridge supports will not result in an increase in water surface elevation consistent with CVFPB requirements as described in the California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Waters, Division 1, Central Valley Flood Protection Board, Article 8 Standards, including Sections 113 and 128, Bridges. Also, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall review plans for compliance with Chapter

15.32, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Lincoln Municipal Code and the City of Lincoln, Department of Public Works, Design Criteria and Procedures Manual, to confirm that proposed bridges, as designed, would not substantially impede or redirect flood flows.

The City Engineer shall confirm that any proposed bridge is constructed in accordance with the approved plans.

Demonstrate to the City that the applicant
has received a CVFPB encroachment
permit.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to grading permit
issuance
CVFPB, City of Lincoln Public
Works Department, City of
Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.10-8: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative violations of water quality
standards or waste discharge
requirements by increasing runoff,
providing additional sources of
polluted runoff, or otherwise
degrading water quality.

3.10-8:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

3.10-10: Implementation of the
proposed project could contribute to
cumulative substantial alteration of
the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the
alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result
in substantial erosion or siltation onor off-site.

3.10-10:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.10-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.10-1.

3.11 Land Use

3.11-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would conflict with
adjacent land uses.

3.11-1:

Where residential uses would be located adjacent to parcels where agricultural operations are permitted, including livestock grazing and/or confinement, the applicant shall provide to all homebuyers notice in a transfer deed regarding the Agricultural Overlay District and required buffers and/or setbacks, as well as agricultural operations and potential nuisance activities that could occur on lands adjacent to the homesite. The applicant shall provide the City with draft notice language to be included in each deed prior to pulling the first building permit.

Provide notice in a transfer deed regarding
the Agricultural Overlay District and required
buffers, setbacks, and potential agricultural
operations and nuisance activities that could
occur. Provide draft language for the City to
include within each deed.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to building permit
issuance
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
586

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-32 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.11-2: Implementation of the
proposed project would create
conflicting land uses within the Plan
Area.

3.11-2:
i) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.

During the design review process, the applicant shall adhere to the following measures to reduce impacts from light and glare:
a) All light standards shall be shielded and directed downward so that light shall not emit higher than a horizontal level.
b) Reflective surfaces of multi-story buildings facing streets, open spaces, parks, and residential neighborhoods shall be oriented to avoid generating glare that could create a nuisance or safety hazard.
c) For parks or other facilities anticipated to include nighttime activities, the site and placement of overhead lighting shall be designed to minimize exposure of adjacent properties to spillover light and minimize the amount of light that would be visible above the horizontal plane of the light fixture. d) Normal operating hours for lighting related to nighttime recreational activities shall be until 10:00 p.m. on Sunday through Thursday and on Friday and Saturday until 11:00 p.m. to reduce the disruption to adjacent properties. to reduce the disruption to adjacent properties. Special events that would require lighting beyond normal operating hours would be subject to a permit to be issued by the City.
ii) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.11-1. iii) The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-6, which requires as follows:

During individual phase design preparation, the applicant shall implement the following measures to assure that interior and exterior noise levels from stationary sources are below the City’s standards of 60 dBA Ldn outdoor and 45 dBA Ldn indoor, respectively:
a) The proposed land uses shall be designed so that on-site mechanical equipment (e.g., HVAC units, compressors, generators) and area-source operations (e.g., loading docks, parking lots, and recreational-use areas) are located no closer than 120 feet from the nearest residential dwelling or provided shielding from nearby noise sensitive land uses to meet City noise standards. Shielding must have a minimum height sufficient to completely block line-of-sight between the on-site noise source and the nearest residential dwelling to meet the City noise standards. Based on the size and placement of the HVAC units (i.e., ground level or roof top), barrier heights may range between three to six feet.

Depending on the layout of the proposed loading docks, barriers that completely block line-of-sight between the loading docks and the nearest residential dwelling may not be feasible.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4. See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure

3.1-4.

See Mitigation Measure 3.1-4.
b) Limit heavy truck deliveries to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. unless a site-specific acoustical study prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director or Chief Building Official concludes that deliveries outside of this timeframe would not adversely affect sensitive receptors. c) The use of loudspeakers and similar devices used within parks shall be prohibited outside the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. d) Commercial loading docks located within 100 feet of existing or proposed residences shall be positioned in areas shielded from view of adjacent noisesensitive uses by intervening commercial buildings to the degree feasible. If required to reduce noise to acceptable levels, solid noise barriers shall be constructed at the boundary of commercial uses with loading docks and have a minimum height sufficient to intercept line-of-sight between heavy trucks and the affected area of the noise-sensitive uses.
e) Signs shall be posted prohibiting idling of delivery trucks to 5 minutes or less Attachment 10 Exhibit B
587

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-33 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.12 Noise

3.12-1: Construction of the proposed
project could temporarily increase
ambient noise levels.

3.12-1:

The City shall ensure construction contractors for each project phase comply with the following mitigation measures:
a) Construction hours shall be limited to those allowed in the City’s Public Facilities Improvement Standards between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday If construction is necessary on Sunday and Holidays the applicant shall submit a written request to the Director of Public Works or City Engineer, as applicable, 72-hours prior to the desired construction. If work is allowed outside aforementioned work hours, the applicant shall have a copy of the written approval available at the work site.
b) All heavy construction equipment and all stationary noise sources (such as diesel generators) shall have manufacturer-installed mufflers. c) Equipment warm up areas, water tanks and equipment storage areas shall not be located closer than 200 feet from existing residences.
d) Applicant shall provide two weeks advanced notice to all residences located within 300 feet of construction activities, including the approximate start date and duration of such compaction activities.
e) Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers, pavement breakers, and rock drills) used for proposed project construction shall be hydraulically or electrically powered where available to avoid noise associated with compressed air exhaust from pneumatically powered tools. Where use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used; this muffler can lower noise levels from the exhaust by up to about 10 dBA. External jackets on the tools themselves shall be used where available; this could achieve a reduction of 5 dBA. f) Appropriately sized noise barriers or shielding shall be erected for construction work involving heavy duty construction equipment if occurring within 300 feet of receptors for an extended period of time (more than 2 weeks).

Abide by construction requirements per the
City
(Full Specific Plan and
Area A)
Construction contractors During construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.12-2: Construction of the proposed
project would result in exposure of
persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels.

3.12-2:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

3.12-3: Implementation of the
proposed project would expose
noise-sensitive land uses to
transportation noise levels in excess
of the City of Lincoln General Plan
noise standard or result in a
substantial permanent increase in
ambient transportation-related noise
above existing levels.

3.12-3:

Prior to approval of the tentative subdivision map (TSM) for any residential uses located adjacent to Dowd Road (between Mavis Avenue and Nicolaus Road), Mavis Road (between Dowd Road and Nelson Lane), Old Nelson Lane (between Moore Road and SR 65) and SR 65 (between Wise Road and south of Nelson Lane), the TSM applicant shall submit to the City an acoustical study demonstrating that noise attenuation features included in the project would reduce outdoor and interior noise levels to less than the City’s 60 dBA Ldn and 45 dBA Ldn noise standards, respectively. The noise study shall identify the measures to be utilized and the noise attenuation attributable to each feature.

Noise attenuating features may include, but are not limited to:
a) Construct noise barriers (walls and/or berms), as appropriate on a site-specific basis, to reduce traffic noise levels at noise-sensitive land uses, which have been found to be significantly impacted by traffic noise. A concrete cinderblock noise barrier must completely block line-of-sight between the source and receptor, and can reduce traffic noise levels by at least 10 dB. Any noise walls shall be landscaped with vines (to be fully covered within three years) and shall be landscaped in accordance with the General Development Plan (GDP).
b) Design and construct residential buildings adjacent to Dowd Road (between Mavis Avenue and Nicolaus Road), Mavis Road (between Dowd Road and Nelson Lane), Old Nelson Lane (between Moore Road and SR 65) and SR 65 (between Wise Road and south of Nelson Lane) so that their external activity areas are not within line-ofsight of these roadways. This could result in noise reductions of at least 3 dB. c) Repaving impacted roadways with “quiet” pavement types such as rubberized concrete. Roadways constructed with rubberized concrete can resulted in a net decrease in traffic noise levels of approximately 4 dB compared to that created by conventional asphalt.

Submit an acoustical study demonstrating
that noise attenuation features included in
the project would reduce outdoor and
interior noise levels to less than the City’s
60 dBA Ldn and 45 dBA Ldn noise
standards, respectively
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to approval of the
tentative subdivision map
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
588

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-34 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party d) The applicant shall conduct an acoustical analysis to confirm that if the materials to be used for residential building construction would reduce interior noise levels to 45 dBA Ldn. If the analysis determines that additional noise insulation features are required, the acoustical analysis shall identify the type of noise insulation features that would be required to reduce the interior noise levels to 45 dBA Ldn, and the applicant shall incorporate these features into the building design.

3.12-4: The proposed project could
result in exposure of people residing
or working at the project site to
excessive noise levels from a project
located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within two miles of a
public or public use airport.

3.12-4:

If a daycare center is located in Compatibility Zone C1, the applicant shall conduct an acoustical analysis to confirm that the materials to be used for construction of the commercial building housing the daycare center would result in an interior to exterior noise reduce of at least 20 dB. If the analysis determines that additional noise insulation features are required, the acoustical analysis shall identify the type of noise insulation features that would be require to result in an exterior to interior noise reduce of at least 20 dB, and the applicant shall incorporate these features into the building design.

Conduct an acoustical analysis in the event
that a daycare center is located in Lincoln
Regional Airport Compatibility Zone C1
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Community Development Department

3.12-5: Implementation of the
proposed project would expose
people residing or working in the
proposed project area to excessive
noise levels for a project within the
vicinity of a private airstrip.

3.12-5:

The project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.9-6.

3.9-6
Prior to issuance of the first building permit within 500 feet of the airstrip, the project applicant shall purchase and/or relocate the easement and upon purchase or relocation, abandon the airstrip by filing the appropriate documentation with the Placer County Recorder’s Office.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-6. Full Specific Plan and
Area A
See Mitigation Measure

3.9-6.

See Mitigation Measure

3.9-6.

See Mitigation Measure 3.9-6.

3.12-6: Implementation of the
proposed project would expose onsite noise-sensitive land uses to noise generated by commercial,
educational and recreational activities
in excess of the City of Lincoln
General Plan noise standard or result
in an increase in ambient noise

3.12-6:

During individual phase design preparation, the applicant shall implement the following measures to assure that interior and exterior noise levels from stationary sources are below the City’s standards of 60 dBA Ldn outdoor and 45 dBA Ldn indoor, respectively:
a) The proposed land uses shall be designed so that on-site mechanical equipment (e.g., HVAC units, compressors, generators) and area-source operations (e.g., loading docks, parking lots, and recreational-use areas) are located no closer than 120 feet from the nearest residential dwelling or provided shielding from nearby noise sensitive land uses to meet City noise standards. Shielding must have a minimum height sufficient to completely block line-of-sight between the on-site noise source and the nearest residential dwelling to meet the City noise standards. Based on the size and placement of the HVAC units (i.e., ground level or roof top), barrier heights may range between three to six feet. Depending on the layout of the proposed loading docks, barriers that completely block line-of-sight between the loading docks and the nearest residential dwelling may not be feasible. b) Limit heavy truck deliveries to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. unless a site-specific acoustical study prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director or Chief Building Official concludes that deliveries outside of this timeframe would not adversely affect sensitive receptors.
c) The use of loudspeakers and similar devices used within parks shall be prohibited outside the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Sunday through Thursday, and 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday.
d) Commercial loading docks located within 100 feet of existing or proposed residences shall be positioned in areas shielded from view of adjacent noise-sensitive uses by intervening commercial buildings to the degree feasible. If required to reduce noise to acceptable levels, solid noise barriers shall be constructed at the boundary of commercial uses with loading docks and have a minimum height sufficient to intercept line-of-sight between heavy trucks and the affected area of the noisesensitive uses. e) Signs shall be posted prohibiting idling of delivery trucks to 5 minutes or less.

Implement the noise mitigation measures Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to individual phase
design implementation
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.12-7: Construction of the proposed
project, including other cumulative
growth, would temporarily add to
cumulative noise levels in the vicinity
of the proposed project site.

3.12-7:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-1.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-1.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
589

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-35 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.12-8: Construction of the proposed
project, combined with other
cumulative growth, would temporarily
add to cumulative groundborne
vibration levels in the vicinity of the
proposed project site.

3.12-8:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-2. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-2.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-2.

3.12-9: Increases in traffic from the
proposed project, in combination with
other development, could result in
cumulatively considerable noise
increases.

3.12-9:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.12-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.12-3.

3.14 Public Services

3.14-4: The proposed project could
result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision
of new or physically altered parks or
recreation facilities or the need for
new or physically altered parks or
recreation facilities, the construction
of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable performance
objectives for parks and recreation
services.

3.14-4:

If fewer than 38.7 acres of the Regional Sports Park are available for public use, the project applicant shall either (i) provide the required additional active recreational park land; or (ii) pay the In Lieu Fee for park and recreational facilities as set forth in Lincoln Municipal Code section 17.32.010 for the difference between the demand for active recreational park (116.7 acres) and the active recreational parkland provided.

Agree to build or pay In Lieu Fee to
compensate for required additional active
recreational park land.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to issuance of a
building permit
City of Lincoln Community
Development Department

3.15 Transportation

3.15-1: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at intersections under
the City of Lincoln’s jurisdiction
operating at an acceptable LOS
under existing conditions.

3.15-1:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following improvements.

These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, PFE credits would be given to the constructing party. Alternatively, the City may require the project applicants to construct the improvements and provide them with a right of reimbursement from third parties who also benefit from the improvements. The development agreement between the City and project applicants shall specify the timing of the fair share payment or construction of these improvements, with the required timing prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study to be funded by the project applicants.

If, in the alternative to paying the applicable PFE fees, the project applicant(s) are required to construct improvements, the following improvements would be required to restore operations to an acceptable level at each intersection. a) Nelson Lane / Nicolaus Road (#10):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. To achieve LOS C operations, it may be necessary to provide protected left-turn movements and a right-turn overlap phase for eastbound right turn movements. Northbound U-turn movements would need to be prohibited to allow for the eastbound right-turn overlap phase. Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE. - Restripe the southbound approach to provide the following lane configurations:
i. One left-turn lane, one through lane, and one shared through-right turn lane - Reconfigure the south leg of the intersection to provide the following lane configurations:
i. Two northbound left turn pocket lanes
ii. One northbound through lane
iii. One northbound trap-right turn lane
iv. Two southbound receiving lanes
- Reconfigure the east leg of the intersection to provide a second westbound leftturn lane - Reconfigure the west leg of the intersection to include the following:

Pay fair share costs improvements outlined
included in the City of Lincoln Public
Facilities Element (PFE) fee program. Or,
the project applicant could construct the
requested improvements and, under the
City’s direction, be given a right of
reimbursement from third parties who
benefit from the said improvements.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
590

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-36 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party i. Restripe the eastbound shared through-right turn lane into a dedicated rightturn lane. This would result in one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one right-turn lane.
ii. Add a second westbound receiving lane
b) Airport Road / Nicolaus Road (#11):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. If necessary to achieve LOS C operations, provide protected phasing for left-turn movements. Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE.
- Widen the southbound approach to add a southbound left-turn pocket - Widen the south leg of the intersection to include the following:
i. One northbound left turn pocket lane
ii. One northbound through lane
iii. One northbound channelized free right turn lane
iv. Two southbound receiving lanes
- Widen the east leg of the intersection to include the following:
i. Two westbound left turn lanes (one trap lane; one pocket lane) ii. Restripe the existing westbound lane to a through-right lane iii. Two eastbound receiving lanes (one from the eastbound through lane and one from the northbound free right-turn lane)
- Widen the eastbound approach to include one left-turn pocket lane, one through lane, and one-right turn pocket lane.
c) Dowd Road / Nicolaus Road (#13):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. If necessary to achieve LOS C operations, provide protected phasing for left-turn movements. Signalizing this intersection is identified in the Village 5 Specific Plan, and is included in the updated PFE.
- Widen the southbound approach to add a southbound left-turn pocket - Widen the south leg of the intersection to include the following improvements:
i. One northbound left turn pocket lane
ii. One northbound through lane
iii. One northbound trap right turn lane
iv. Two southbound receiving lanes
- Widen the east leg of the intersection to include the following improvements:
i. Two westbound left turn lanes (one trap lane; one pocket lane) ii. Restripe the existing westbound lane to a through-right lane - Widen the eastbound approach to include one left-turn pocket lane, one shared through-right turn lane.
d) Fiddyment Road / Moore Road (#15):
- Widen the southbound approach to add a southbound right-turn pocket e) Dowd Road / Moore Road (#22):
- Change the traffic control to side-street stop control for Moore Road, and free movements on Dowd Road (existing configuration is free movements on Moore Road and side-street stop control for Dowd Road).
f) Lakeside Drive / Nicolaus Road (#32):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met. Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE.

Additional mitigation to reduce impacts of Mitigation Measures 3.15-1(b) and (c) to intersections #11 and #13.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
591

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-37 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party Option 1:
g) The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the intersections of Airport Road/Nicolaus Road (#11) and Dowd Road/Nicolaus Road (#13). In addition to compliance with Mitigation Measures 3.15-1(b) and (c), the City shall cause one of the following measures to be taken prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study at each location to be funded by the project applicant(s):
i. The project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the City staff to ensure signal phasing times would allow adequate time for cyclists to cross through the widened intersections during green and amber signal phases; or ii. The project applicants’ intersection designs shall eliminate free right-turn movements in exchange for right-turn overlap phases or dual right turn lanes to serve high right-turn traffic volumes. Any dual right-turn lanes shall be designed to ensure adequate visibility of pedestrians, including any use of a channelized right-turn lane for the inside right-turn lane.

Option 2:
g) The project applicant(s) shall apply to the Community Development Director for a determination as to whether the recommended intersection widening conflicts with the City’s Policy T-2.3 and T-5.3 to achieve a traffic design to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The Community Development Director may determine that an exception to the LOS C standard in Policy T-2.3 is warranted.

3.15-3: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at future City of Lincoln
intersections in Village 5.

3.15-3:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the future Nelson Lane / Mavis Road intersection (#40) and shall cause the following improvements to be constructed prior to the service level degrading to LOS D:
• Southbound: channelize the right-turn lane and add a merge lane on westbound Mavis Road to allow “free” right-turn operations
• Eastbound: widen the eastbound approach to include a third left turn lane • Westbound: channelize the right-turn lane and add a merge lane on northbound Nelson Lane to allow “free” right-turn operations.

Monitor conditions at Nelson Lane/Mavis
Road intersection and construction
improvements.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to service level
reaching LOS D
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department
The development agreement between the City and project applicants shall specify the timing of the construction of these improvements, with the required timing prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study to be funded by the project applicants.

Additional mitigation to reduce impacts to Intersection #40 if widened:

Option 1:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the intersection of Nelson Lane/Mavis Road (#40). In addition to compliance with Mitigation Measures 3.15-3, the City shall cause one of the following measures to be taken prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study at each location to be funded by the project applicant(s):
a) The project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the City staff to ensure signal phasing times would allow adequate time for cyclists to cross through the widened intersections during green and amber signal phases; or
b) The project applicants’ intersection designs shall eliminate free right-turn movements in exchange for right-turn overlap phases or dual right turn lanes to serve high rightturn traffic volumes. Any dual right-turn lanes shall be designed to ensure adequate visibility of pedestrians, including any use of a channelized right-turn lane for the inside right-turn lane.

Option 2:

The project applicant(s) may apply to the Community Development Director for a determination as to whether the recommended intersection widening conflicts with the City’s Policy T-2.3 and T-5.3 to achieve a traffic design to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The Community Development Director may determine that an exception to the LOS C standard in Policy T-2.3 is warranted.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
592

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-38 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.15-4: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at intersections under
the County of Placer’s jurisdiction.

3.15-4:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to restore vehicle traffic operations to an acceptable LOS at each intersection.
a) Fiddyment Road / Athens Avenue (#16):
- Widening of the northbound approach to include a right-turn pocket lane - Widening of the southbound approach to include a left-turn pocket lane - Signalization at the intersection with a protected southbound left-turn movement.

There is no funding program in place for these improvements. Accordingly, the project applicant(s) shall obtain cost estimates for these improvements and determine its/their fair share payments. Once the fair share has been determined, the project applicant(s) shall pay that fair share to the City to ensure the payment goes to the above-referenced improvements.
b) Fiddyment Road / W. Sunset Boulevard (#18):
- Widening of the northbound approach to include a left-turn pocket lane - Signalization at the intersection with a protected northbound left-turn movement.

Pay fair share improvements for Fiddyment
Road/Athens Avenue and Fiddyment Road/
West Sunset Boulevard intersections.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
There is no funding program in place for these improvements. Accordingly, the project applicant(s) shall obtain cost estimates for these improvements and determine its/their fair share payments. Once the fair share has been determined, the project applicant(s) shall pay that fair share to the City to ensure the payment goes to the above-referenced improvements.

3.15-6: Implementation of the
proposed project would increase
traffic levels at intersections
maintained by Caltrans.

3.15-6:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the construction of a new interchange at SR 65 / Nelson Lane (#3), as supported by Lincoln General Plan Policy T-2.9. The timing of these payments is outlined in the development agreement. As described in Section 3.15.2, the City of Lincoln is in the process of updating its PFE fee program. This interchange is included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, the project applicants shall pay their fair share towards these improvements through the City of Lincoln’s updated PFE fee program and ensure that they are constructed prior to the service level degrading to an unacceptable LOS F.

To initiate the Caltrans project development process towards implementing the new interchange, the project applicant shall fund the preparation of a Project Study Report – Project Development Support (PSR-PDS) document for a new interchange at SR 65/Nelson Lane (#3) in coordination with the City of Lincoln and Caltrans. The Caltrans project development process will determine the ultimate configuration of the new interchange and ensure that the ultimate configuration provides acceptable operations (i.e., LOS) based on Caltrans standards. Through the Caltrans project development process, the following intersection control options may be considered in accordance with Caltrans’ Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) policy:
• Unsignalized (side street stop controlled);
• Roundabout – Single or multi-lane;
• Diverging diamond interchange;
• Signalized spread diamond;
• Signalized single point urban interchange; or
• Signalized partial cloverleaf.

While the PSR-PDS process would determine the ultimate configuration of the interchange, the City and project applicant assumed a six-lane signalized partial cloverleaf interchange for this analysis based on the available footprint and the planned circulation network identified in the Village 5 Specific Plan. Since the six-lane partial cloverleaf provides the greatest capacity and has the largest footprint of the options listed above, it was determined that this configuration would verify whether an interchange would adequately mitigate the project’s impact on traffic operations (i.e., if a six-lane partial cloverleaf does not meet LOS standards, additional mitigation may be necessary).

Analysis presented in Table 3.15-23 shows that the six-lane signalized partial cloverleaf interchange provides acceptable operations with the following lane configurations at the interchange ramp terminal intersections:

Pay fair share improvements for SR 65/
Nelson Lane interchange.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
593

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-39 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party • SR 65 Northbound Ramps / Nelson Lane intersection:
i. Northbound SR 65 off-ramp: one left-turn lane, one shared left-right turn lane, and one right turn lane
ii. Northbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the northbound SR 65 loop on-ramp
iii. Southbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the northbound SR 65 slip on-ramp
• SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Nelson Lane intersection:
i. Southbound SR 65 off-ramp: one left-turn lane and one right-turn lane ii. Northbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the southbound SR 65 slip on-ramp
iii. Southbound Nelson Lane: three through lanes, one free right-turn lane onto the southbound SR 65 loop on-ramp

3.15-13: The proposed project could
result in temporary impacts to
transportation and traffic when
construction activity occurs within the
Village 5 Specific Plan site.

3.15-13:

Prior to the beginning of construction for each project phase, project applicants shall prepare a detailed Construction Traffic Management Plan subject to review and approval by the City Department of Public Works, in consultation with Caltrans, affected transit providers, and local emergency service providers. The Traffic Management Plan shall ensure that acceptable operating conditions are maintained on local roadways and freeway facilities. At a minimum, the plan shall include:
• The number of truck trips, time, and day of street closures • Time of day of arrival and departure of trucks
• Provision of a truck circulation pattern
• Identification of detour routes and signing plan for street closures, if necessary • Maintain safe and efficient access routes for emergency vehicles • Manual traffic control when necessary
• Proper advance warning and posted signage concerning street closures • Provisions for pedestrian and bicycle safety
A copy of the Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted to local emergency response agencies and transit providers, and these agencies shall be notified at least 30 days before the commencement of construction that would partially or fully obstruct roadways.

Prepare a detailed Construction Traffic
Management Plan.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction Caltrans, City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-14: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the City of
Lincoln’s jurisdiction operating at an
acceptable LOS under cumulative no
project conditions.

3.15-14:

Intersections 12, 14, 26, 32 and 33 have been incorporated into the City’s update PFE program for transportation. As a result, the project applicants may mitigate by either paying their fair share cost towards the following improvements, or in the alternative to paying fees, the City may require project applicant(s) to construct the improvements identified in below. The development agreement between the City and project applicants shall specify the timing of the fair share payment or construction of these improvements, with the required timing prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study to be funded by the project applicants:

In the alternative to paying fees, the project applicant(s) shall construct the following improvements to restore operations to an acceptable level at each intersection. a) Joiner Parkway / Nicolaus Road (#12):
- Restripe the northbound shared through-left turn lane to be a dedicated left-turn lane
- Restripe the southbound shared through-left turn lane to be a dedicated through lane
- Re-time the signal to provide protected northbound and southbound left-turn phasing.

Pay fair share fees or construct necessary
improvements for Intersections 12, 14, 26,
32, and 33.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
b) Old Nelson Lane / Moore Road (#14):
- Widen Moore Road to provide an eastbound left-turn pocket and a two-way leftturn lane to allow two-stage gap acceptance for southbound left-turn movements.

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
594

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-40 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party c) Joiner Parkway / Ferrari Ranch Road (#26):
- Widen the northbound Joiner Parkway approach to include a third left-turn lane - To provide space to receive the third northbound left-turn lane on westbound Ferrari Ranch Road, remove the channelized free right-turn lane from southbound Joiner Parkway
d) Lakeside Drive / Nicolaus Road (#32):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met, as stated in Mitigation

3.15-1(f). Signalizing this intersection was identified in the previous City of Lincoln PFE fee program for Transportation and is included in the updated PFE. e) Teal Hollow Drive / Nicolaus Road (#33):
- Signalize the intersection when signal warrants are met.

Additional mitigation to reduce impacts to intersection #26 if widened:

Option 1:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the intersection of Joiner Parkway/Ferrari Ranch Road (#26). In addition to compliance with Mitigation Measures 3.15-14, the City shall cause one of the following measures to be taken prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, as determined by a traffic study at each location to be funded by the project applicant(s):
f) The project applicant(s) shall coordinate with the City staff to ensure signal phasing times would allow adequate time for cyclists to cross through the widened intersections during green and amber signal phases; or
g) The project applicants’ intersection designs shall eliminate free right-turn movements in exchange for right-turn overlap phases or dual right turn lanes to serve high rightturn traffic volumes. Any dual right-turn lanes shall be designed to ensure adequate visibility of pedestrians, including any use of a channelized right-turn lane for the inside right-turn lane.

Option 2:
f) The project applicant(s) may apply to the Community Development Director for a determination as to whether the recommended intersection widening conflicts with the City’s Policy T-2.3 and T-5.3 to achieve a traffic design to minimize conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians and bicycles. The Community Development Director may determine that an exception to the LOS C standard in Policy T-2.3 is warranted.

3.15-15: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the City of
Lincoln’s jurisdiction operating at an
unacceptable LOS under cumulative
no project conditions.

3.15-15:
a) For the cumulative impacts to Airport Road / Nicolaus Road (#11), the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(b) and (g). See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(b) and (g).
b) For the cumulative impacts to Fiddyment Road / Moore Road (#15), the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(d). See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(d).
c) For the cumulative impacts to Dowd Road / Moore Road (#22), the project applicant shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-1(e). See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-1(e).
d) For the cumulative impacts to Caledon Circle / Ferrari Ranch Road (#25), the project applicant shall pay their fair share cost towards the following improvements. These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program:
- Provide an overlap phase on the northbound right-turn movement.

Pay fair share cost towards Intersection 25. Full Specific Plan and Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-16: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at future City
of Lincoln intersections in Village 5.

3.15-16:

The City shall monitor traffic conditions at the future Dowd Road / Mavis Road (#37) and Nelson Lane / Mavis Road (#40) intersections, and shall cause the following improvements to be constructed prior to the service level degrading to LOS D, subject to reimbursement to the constructing entity by those benefitting from the improvements:
a) Dowd Road / Mavis Road (#37):
- To reduce the average vehicle delay, the following improvements are necessary to provide LOS C operations at Dowd Road / Mavis Road:
i. Provide two southbound left-turn lanes
ii. Channelize the westbound right-turn lane and provide a receiving merge lane on northbound Dowd Road to allow free right-turn movements Monitor traffic conditions at Intersections 37
and 40, and subsequently cause
improvements to be constructed.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
City of Lincoln
Community Development
Department
Prior to LOS D at
Intersections 37 and 40
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
595

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-41 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party b) Nelson Lane / Mavis Road (#40):
- Implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-3. See Mitigation Measure

3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-3.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-3.

3.15-17: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the County of
Placer’s jurisdiction

3.15-17:
a) For the intersection at Fiddyment Road / Athens Avenue (#16) and Fiddyment Road/ W. Sunset Boulevard (#18), the project applicants shall implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-4 and widening of Fiddyment Road consistent with Mitigation Measure

3.15-20.

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-4 for
Intersection #16.

See Implement Mitigation
Measure 3.15-4.

See Implement Mitigation
Measure 3.15-4.

See Implement Mitigation
Measure 3.15-4.

See Implement Mitigation
Measure 3.15-4.
b) For the intersection at Fiddyment Road / E. Catlett Road (#17), the project applicant shall pay their fair share costs towards the following improvements:
- Widening the northbound and southbound approaches to include two through lanes; this is consistent with Mitigation Measure 3.15-20(a). - Adding a northbound left-turn pocket.
- Signalizing the intersection with protected northbound left-turn phasing - Widening the eastbound approach to include a left-turn pocket and right-turn lane. Provide an overlap phase for the eastbound right-turn movement.

Pay fair share costs towards required
improvements for Intersection #17.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-18: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections under the City of
Roseville’s jurisdiction.

3.15-18:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at each of the following intersections:
a) Fiddyment Road / Blue Oaks Boulevard (#19):
- An overlap phase on the southbound right-turn movement. This improvement would mitigate the project’s incremental contribution to delay at this intersection. b) Fiddyment Road / Baseline Road (#21):
- An overlap phase on the southbound right-turn movement. This improvement would mitigate the project’s incremental contribution to delay at this intersection.

Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for Intersections #19 and 21.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-19: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels at
intersections maintained by Caltrans.

3.15-19:
a) For SR 65 / Nelson Lane (#3a and #3b), implement Mitigation Measure 3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-6. See Mitigation Measure

3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure

3.15-6.

See Mitigation Measure 3.15-6.
b) For SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Ferrari Ranch Road (#4):

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at SR 65 Southbound Ramps/ Ferrari Ranch Road. These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, the project applicant shall pay their fair share through the City of Lincoln’s updated PFE fee program:
- Widening the eastbound approach to include a dedicated right-turn lane; channelize the eastbound right-turn movement onto the southbound on-ramp to allow free right-turn movements.

Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for Intersection #4.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
c) SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Twelve Bridges Drive (#9):

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost towards the following recommended improvements to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at SR 65 Southbound Ramps / Twelve Bridges Drive. These improvements are included in the City’s updated PFE fee program. Therefore, the project applicant shall pay their fair share through the City of Lincoln’s updated PFE fee program:
- Restriping the northbound off-ramp converting the existing shared through-right turn lane to a shared through-left turn lane
Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for Intersection #9.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department
Attachment 10 Exhibit B
596

4. Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Village 5 & Special Use District b (SUD-B) Specific Plan 4-42 ESA / 201800402.01 Final Partially Recirculated Environmental Impact Report August 2021 TABLE 4-1
VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
Impact Mitigation Measure Action(s) Component Implementing Party Timing Monitoring Party

3.15-20: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels on study
roadway segments in Placer County.

3.15-20:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share cost to the City for the following recommended improvements to restore vehicle traffic operations to mitigate the proposed project’s incremental contribution to unacceptable traffic operations at each roadway segment.
a) Widening Fiddyment Road from Athens Avenue to Moore Road from a two-lane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided arterial.
b) Widening Fiddyment Road from Roseville City Limits to Athens Avenue from a twolane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided arterial. c) Widening Athens Road from Fiddyment Road to Foothills Boulevard from a two-lane undivided arterial to a four-lane divided arterial.

Pay fair share costs towards recommended
improvements for widening at:
-Fiddyment Road from Athens Avenue to
Moore Road
- Athens Road from Fiddyment Road to
Foothills Boulevard
Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.15-22: Implementation of the
proposed project would contribute to
cumulative traffic levels on study
freeway facilities maintained by
Caltrans as well as roadways in the
City of Rocklin.

3.15-22:

The project applicants shall pay their fair share of improvements for impacts to SR 65.

The fair share payment shall consist of the appropriate SPRTA Fees to help fund improvements to SR 65. A number of different improvements may be considered by Caltrans and the City of Lincoln to restore operations to acceptable levels at the impacted locations. Improvements to SR 65 could take the form of auxiliary lanes between interchanges, an additional general purpose or High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction of SR 65, ramp metering, additional deceleration/acceleration areas at affected ramps, increased parallel street capacity, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) solutions, and other options. This mitigation measure would require the project applicant(s) to pay their fair share of future improvements to SR 65. SPRTA funding for the SR 65 widening project is currently estimated to be $67 million of the estimated total cost of $95 million for the project.

Pay fair share costs to fund SPRTA Fees, in
order to help fund improvements to SR 65.

Full Specific Plan and
Area A
Project applicant Prior to construction City of Lincoln Public Works Department

3.16 Utilities and Infrastructure

3.16-2: Implementation of the
proposed project would result in an
increased demand for water supply
that could result in the need for new
or expanded treatment, storage or
conveyance facilities.

3.16-2:

Prior to the approval of the Ophir WTP or Foothill Phase II WTP connection to the City’s water system or demand of 1.7 gpm within the Plan Area, whichever occurs first, the City shall ensure the following improvements or equally effective improvements for treatment and distribution have been completed and are operational:
a) The Ophir Water Treatment Plant is completed and operational at 10 mgd. b) The Village 7 18-inch transmission main is installed and connected to a third POC provided in the Plan Area.

Ensure the following improvements or
equally effective improvements for
treatment and distribution have been
completed and are operational for Ophir
Water Treatment Plant and the Village 7
18-inch transmission main connection to the
Village 5 Plan Area.

Full Specific Plan Project applicant Prior to approval of the Ophir WTP or Foothill
Phase II WTP connection to
the City’s water system or
demand of 1.7 gpm within
the Plan Area, whichever
occurs first
City of Lincoln Public Works
Department

3.16-7: The proposed project would
contribute to cumulative increases in
demand for water supply that could
result in the need for new or
expanded treatment, storage or
conveyance facilities.

3.16-7:

Implement Mitigation Measure 3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure 3.16-2(a). See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

See Mitigation Measure

3.16-2(a).

Attachment 10 Exhibit B
597
Attachment 10 Exhibit C
598
8' 12' Bike/N.E.V. NTS Windsor Cove Development 11' 13' Median 6' 6.5' CL WalkProposed Moore Road (Sheet 1) Sound wall 25' Min Landscape Corridor12.5' PUE 1 (Future Ferrari Ranch Road) 12' Bike/N.E.V. 11' 8' 2' Median 12.5' PUE EX.20' R.O.W. 25' LSC 75' CONSERVATION EASEMENT 3' CL APN: 021-283-003 (CITY PROPERTY) PL APN: 021-490-002 3' * 51.5' AT RIGHT TURN LANE 40.5' R.O.W. ESMT. FOR PUBLIC STREET & HWY PURPOSES * EX.20' R.O.W. 40.5' R.O.W. NOTE: PROPOSED FULL FRONTAGE WIDENING Residential PSE Varies 47'-75' Street Tree CL Median Varies 0' or 15' Varies 13' or 27' 15' Min LSC Residential Type 2 C&G Type 5 Curb Type 2 C&G VCE Entrance 87' P.S.E. Section NTS 6 (C STREET) Private Street Section (Sheet 1) 3' 3' No Parking No Parking Sound Wall Sound Wall P/L P/L 15' Min LSC Varies 13' or 27' Walk 5' P/L P/L 14' PUE 14' PUE varies 0'-8' Ultimate VCE 36' Residential Street Section Private Road-No Curb & Gutter 10' (Min) Residential 28' PSE (Min)* Residential 15' Min Multi Purpose Easement CLNTS
7 (B LOOP) (Sheet 1) Shoulder 15' Min Multi Purpose Easement Shoulder P/L P/L 4' 4' VCE VCE * 36' PARKING ON BOTH SIDES 32' WITH PARKING ON ONE SIDE 10' (Min)12' 12' 99' R.O.W Bike/N.E.V.8' Bike/N.E.V. 8' NTS Nelson Lane P/L Future Development by Others 30' Min Landscape Corridor/PUE 11' 11' 14' Median 30' Min Landscape Corridor/PUE 10' 6' Walk 6' 8' CL FUTURE-ULTIMATE Walk Windsor Cove Development 11' 12' 49.5' 49.5' Sound Wall 5 P/L (Sheet 1) (Per Village 5 Specific Plan) R/W (IOD Being Dedicated With Windsor Cove (3'-99')) R/W (NELSON LANE ROADWAY IS NOT PROPOSED ON THIS TENTATIVE MAP) FUTURE LANDSCAPING WHEN NELSON RD IS CONSTRUCTED Residential PSE Varies 44'-87' Street Tree CL Median Varies 0' or 15' Varies 13' or 27' 15' Min LSC Residential Type 2 C&G Type 2 C&G VLDR Village Entrance 87' P.S.E. Section NTS
2 (B STREET) (Sheet 1) 3' 3' No Parking No Parking Sound Wall Sound Wall P/L 15' Min LSC Varies 13' or 27' Walk 5' P/L P/L 14' PUE P/L Walk 5' 14' PUE varies 0'-8' varies 0'-8' Type 5 Curb Local Minor Residential Street Section (Design Modification) 18' 18' Residential Residential Walk 41' PSE./HOA Street Tree 12.5' PUE 5' P/L 12.5' PUE P/L CLNTS
4 (A LOOP, A STREET, AA STREET) (Sheet 1) 30' Parking Parking (40' ROW Parking is on one side) Type 1 C&G Type 1 C&G Local Minor Residential Street Section (Design Modification) 18' 18' Open Space 46' PSE/HOA Street Tree 12.5' PUE P/L CLNTS
3 (A LOOP) (Sheet 1) 30' Parking Parking Street Tree Residential 12.5' PUE P/L Walk 5' Walk 5' Type 1 C&G Type 1 C&G 29.5' 15.0' 25.0' 25.0' 16.0' 15.0' 25.0' R50.0' 25.0' 16.0' 29.5' 1 52 51
C ST
12 13 12 11 R50.0' R37.5' 30.0' R37.5' R30.0' R30.0' 15.5' 29.5' 15.0' 29.5' R50.0' R50.0' 15.5' 15.0' 15.5' 4 3 51
2 1
B STA LP R30.0' R30.0' R37.5' R37.5' 30.0' R26.0' 36.0' R26.0' 36.0' SS SS 3.0' 5.0'
WSS SS W Local Minor Residential Street Section (Design Modification) 18' 18' Residential Residential Walk 46' PSE./HOA Street Tree 12.5' PUE 5' P/L 12.5' PUE P/L CLNTS
9 (A LOOP) (Sheet 1) 30' Parking Parking (40' ROW Parking is on one side) Walk 5' 8' 12' 12' Bike/N.E.V. 9' Bike/N.E.V. NTS Windsor Cove Development 11' 11' 2' Median 6' 8' CL PROPOSED-MOORE ROAD PROJECT FRONTAGE Walk Moore Road (Sheet 1) 114' APN: 021-283-003 Sound wall 51.5' R.O.W. 12.5' PUE 25' Min Landscape Corridor 14' PUE 10 11' 11' R/W 3' EX.20' R.O.W. 25' LSC 75' CONSERVATION EASEMENT PL APN: 021-490-002 Local Minor Residential Street Section (Design Modification) 18' 18' Park 46' PSE/HOA CLNTS
8 (WINDSOR PARK DRIVE) (Sheet 1) 30' Parking Parking Street Tree Residential 12.5' PUE P/L Walk 5' Type 2 C&G Type 1 C&G 5' 8' Walk SHEET 2 OF 4 Windsor Cove I:\Drafting\21200-Moore_Road\Tentative Map\21200_TM-02-Sections [VCE Shift].dwg, 06/02/26 09:16:17am, Amohammed SHT2 Detail Sheet 1 Tentative Subdivision Map Typical VLDR Lot Configuration NTS 15' MIN STREET SIDE SETBACK REAR SETBACKS 5' INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK FRONT SETBACK100' MIN 50' MIN (60' MIN CORNER LOT) NOTES: · ALL FRONT AND STREET SIDE SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. · CONCEPTUAL PLAN, AND SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL BUILDING FOOTPRINTS AND LAYOUT WILL VARY. 15' -PORCH 20' -LIVING SPACE 15' -PORCH, 20' -LIVING SPACE, SIDE ENTRY GARAGE 20' -FRONT ENTRY GARAGE

STREET STREET
20'
Typical VLDR Lot Minimum Distance NTS 100' MIN (TYP) 50' MIN (TYP) STREET 46' 78' 50' MIN (TYP) NOTE: LOT DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE EXAMPLES AND USED FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES. 20' REAR YARD SETBACK 20' FRONT YARD SETBACK 100' MIN (TYP) 50' MIN (TYP) STREET 78' 46' 50' MIN (TYP) 20' REAR YARD SETBACK 20' FRONT YARD SETBACK Typical VCE Lot Configuration NTS NOTES: · ALL FRONT AND STREET SIDE SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. · CONCEPTUAL PLAN, AND SHOWN FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL BUILDING FOOTPRINTS AND LAYOUT WILL VARY. STREET HOUSE City of Lincoln, California June 1, 2026 Standard Gated Entrance Detail-VCE -(Design Modification) Scale: 1" = 60' Standard Gated Entrance Detail-VLDR- (Design Modification) Scale: 1" = 60' Street Light location (Design Modification) NTS Light Location at Intersection, Elbow and Cul-De-sac Only

MOORE ROAD MOORE ROAD
CL
CL SCALE: NTS SEPARATION MAY BE INCREASED TO MEET SECTION 64572 OF STATE BOARD OF DRINKING WATER TITLE 17 AND 22 CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TYPICAL UTILITY LOCATIONS (DESIGN MODIFICATION) (SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS FOR PLACEMENT) 4 CL
* GENERAL NOTES: ALL DETAILS MUST CONFORM TO THE APPROVED VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN & GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS UNLESS OTHERWISE ACCEPTED BY THE CITY OF LINCOLN & SHOWN ON THIS MAP @ HOUSE SETBACK @ HOUSE SETBACK 35' MIN AT ELBOWS & CUL-DE-SACS GARAGE LIVING SPACE 20' 15' MIN STREET SIDE SETBACK REAR SETBACK 7.5' INTERIOR SIDE SETBACK FRONT SETBACK130' MIN 80' MIN (60' @ ELBOWS) 20' -PATIO COVER/PORCH 25' -LIVING SPACE 25' -PORCH, 25' -LIVING SPACE, SIDE ENTRY GARAGE 25' -FRONT ENTRY GARAGE

STREET HOUSE LIVING SPACE GARAGE
25'
25' BACK OF SIDEWALK/BACK OF CURB BACK OF SIDEWALK
* Windsor Cove PL PL PL
*
* 75' MIN
# ## PL ## 75' MIN AT ELBOWS FRONTAGE 125' AT ELBOWS
#
Attachment 10 Exhibit C
599

B LP B LP

B LP B LP
B LP
C ST
B ST OS 7 VCE 1 VCE 2 LSC 6 LSC 9 LSC 10
OS 5
A LP MOORE ROAD (FUTURE FERRARI RANCH ROAD) OS 4
OS 6 LSC 7 IOD 1
B ST
12 13 12 11
18" SD
24" SD 30" SD
42" SD
18" SD 24" SD 18" SD 18" SD
1 FM FM

B LP B LP

B LP B LP
B LP
C ST
B ST
A LP
B ST
2 6
4 910 2127 23 32 28 373836
1 3
5 7
811 222526 30 29 31 3334 39 20 25 50 52 44 4045 4148 22 47 4246 202423 49 2119171815161314 293026311211 32 4 3 85 86 10
9 8
5 83 75 51
6 2728
7 17
1 18 19
2 84 87 88 89 82 80 79 78 77 76 90 91
LSC 1
IOD 2 OS 1 (CITY) 81 92 16 12 14 35 24 43 OS 2 (CITY)
LSC 2
OS 7 LSC 5 PARK 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 939495969798 99100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 VLDR 2 VLDR 1 VCE 1 VCE 2 LSC 6 LSC 4 15 OS 3 (CITY) LSC 9 LSC 10 LSC 3
OS 5 MOORE ROAD (FUTURE FERRARI RANCH ROAD) OS 4
OS 6 LSC 7 IOD 1 13
12 13 12
12 13 12 11 OS
42"SS
42"SS
36"RW
36"RW
36"RW
18"W
18"W
18"W 8" W 12"W
8" W 8" W
8" W 8" W
8" W 8" W
12"W 8" W
8" W
8" W FH / BO FH / BO ARV ARV
6"SS
6"SS 6"SS 6"SS
6"SS 6"SS
6"SS
8"SS 6"SS 6"SS 6"SS 6"SS
8"SS 6"SS 36"SS 54" SD
42" SD 42" SD
42"SS
42"SS
42"RW 36"RW
18"W
54"SS
18"W 24"W
12" W 24" W 24" W
12" W 8" W 24" W 8" W 8" W
8" W
8" W 8" W
8" W 8" W
8" W 8"SS 8"SS
8"SS
8"SS 8"SS
8"SS 8"SS
8"SS 8"SS
8"SS 8"SS
8"SS
8"SS 6"SS 8"SS

NELSON LANE
1 1

A LP A LP

B LP B LP

B LP B LP
B LP
C ST

B ST A LP AA ST A LP

A LP A LP A ST
B ST LSC 5 VLDR
12 13 12 8" W 8"SS 1110
9 8 Lift Station 7 6 84 85 86 MH 8' X 8' WASHDOWN PAD (N) VALVE VAULT (N) WET WELL (N) SSMH

FIDDYMENT ROAD
FDG
N
W
S
E
0 100' 200' 300' SCALE 1"=100' NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. 2. THE PROPOSED UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE SHOWN ARE TENTATIVE AND SUBJECT TO REVISION. 3. BACKBONE TRUNK SEWER IS PER VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN WHICH CONNECTS TO THE CITY OF LINCOLN WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND RECLAMATION FACILITY (WWTRF). 4. FUTURE BACKBONE TRUNK SEWER PER VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN. 5. BACKBONE WATER PER VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN. TO BE PERFORMED UNDER AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT. 6. FUTURE BACKBONE WATER PER VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN. 7. FUTURE BACKBONE RECLAIMED WATER (RW) PER VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN. 8. IF VCE DEVELOPS BEFORE LDR, SANITARY SEWER CAN BE RE-ROUTED TO CONNECT TO SANITARY SEWER IN MOORE ROAD. LEGEND EXISTING FUTURE GATE VALVE FEATURE BUTTERFLY VALVE WATER LINE (SIZE INDICATED) SEWER LINE (SIZE INDICATED) FIRE HYDRANT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE AIR RELEASE VALVE BLOW OFF VALVE SS W

S WATER SAMPLING STATION S W
SS

W PROPOSEDSS
W
SS
W SS W
FDG
N
W
S
E Windsor Cove
0 100' 200' 300' SCALE 1"=100'
I:\Drafting\21200-Moore_Road\Tentative Map\21200_TM-03-Sewer-Water [VCE Shift].dwg, 06/02/26 09:20:24am, Amohammed SHT3 Conceptual Sewer and Water Plan Tentative Subdivision Map SHEET 3 OF 4 APN: 021-049-002 APN: 021-050-011 APN: 021-050-001 APN: 021-049-009 APN: 021-049-003 APN: 021-049-004 APN: 021-049-005 APN: 021-049-006APN: 021-049-007 APN: 021-028-003 (CITY OF LINCOLN) APN: 021-028-007 RAVINE

AUBURN WATER LINE (SIZE INDICATED) RW RW RW
EXISTING NELSON ROAD 18"W MOORE ROAD WINDSOR COVE Offsite Water Detail SCALE: 1"=600' APN: 021-049-004 APN: 021-049-005 APN: 021-049-006 APN: 021-049-007 24"W APN: 021-028-003 APN: 021-049-003 24"W W
W
W W
City of Lincoln, California June 1, 2026 SEWER MAY FLOW TOWARD NELSON LANE & CONNECT 1 AT NELSON/MOORE ROAD/FERRARI RANCH ROAD. SEE "LIFT STATION " THIS SHEET LIFT STATION ALTERNATIVE SCALE: NTS MOORE ROAD FM 8"SS 8"SS
6"FM 8"SS
Attachment 10 Exhibit C
600
SD 18" SD
18" SD
24" SD 18" SD
30" SD
42" SD
18" SD 15" SD
12" SD
30" SD 54" SD
42" SD 42" SD 18" SD 24" SD 18" SD 18" SD 15" SD
12" SD
18" SD
18" SD
15" SD
12" SD OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH OH -B
-C

A LP A LP

B LP B LP

B LP B LP
B LP
C ST

B ST A LP AA ST

NELSON LANE A LP

A LP A LP A ST
B ST FL 107.0 ± (MATCH EXISTING) 252220242321191718151613 14293026311211 32 4 3 85 86 10
9 8
5 75 83
6 2728
7 2 1 87 88 89 84 78 77 76 82 80 79 90 91 81 92 39 38 36 35 34 33 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 93949596979899 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112113 2 6
4 910
1 3
5 7
811 52 12 13 108.0 109.0 108.0 107.8 108.5 108.7 FL 108.5 FL 109.0 FL 109.4 FL 110.0 FL 114.0 FG 113.0 FG 112.1 FL 108.3 FL 107.4 108.3 14 17 18 19 16 15 212723 32 28 373836 22 252629 3031333439 20 35 24 504440454148474246495143 37 FL 109.8 FL 114.0 113.69 HP

0.4% 0.5%

0.4% 0.4%

1.1%

0.4%

0.65% 0.4%
113.45 LP

1.4% 0.5%

2.0%

2.0% 0.65% 0.5%

0.4% 0.3%0.3% 0.4% 0.65%
114.9 113.45 LP 114.01 LP 0.40% 0.4% 0.64% 0.8%

0.8% 0.4%
115.05 HP HP HP

0.5% 112.69 LP 0.4% 0.8%

0.7% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4%

0.5% 0.9% 0.4% 0.4%

0.4% 1.5% 0.4%

0.4%

0.5%

0.5%

0.4%

0.4% 0.4%

0.5% 0.8% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.8%

0.4% 0.5%

0.5% 0.7% 0.4%

0.7% 1.1% 0.6%

0.5% 1.0% 0.7% 0.5% 0.8% 1.5%1.5% 0.4% 112.3 LP MATCH EX. 111.2± 115.0 113.2 112.9 LP 114.3 GB 113.40 112.6 LP 114.2 GB 112.3 114 HP 113.5 HP 112.7± MATCH EX 115.05 114.45 GB FL 114.9 FL 113.0± FL 110.6 FL 111.5 FL 110.0 FL 113.5 FL 110.5

0.3%
HP 115.5 FL 112.0 115.05 115.4 HP 114.9 GB 113.75 LP 113.97 GB 116.5 TB 116.5 TB 113.23 GB 112.73 LP 114.09 HP 113.8 GB 112.5 LP 114.1 GB 114.3 115.0 HP 114.0 HP 113.8 GB 113.0 LP 113.65 GB 114.3 GB 114.9 HP 114.1 LP113.60 114.2 HP 113.4 LP 115.1 HP114.5 GB 113.22 LP113.38 LP 113.9 HP 113.42 LP 113.0 LP 114.1 LP 113.5 LP 114.18 HP 113.50 LP 115.1 HP114.32 GB 113.80 LP 114.36 HP 113.80 114.15 114.70 HP 113.56 LP 114.06 LP 114.34 HP 116.3 TB 116 TB LP114.04 116.5 TB 116.9 TB 117.1 TB 116.6 TB 116.6 TB 116.7 TB116.7 TB 116.7 TB TRW 117.1 BRW 114.0 116.5 TB 117.1 TB

0.3% 110.0 110.0 115.9 HP FL 109.0 FL 108.2 FL 111.0 FL 108.6 FL 109.2 FL 109.5 113.1 113.0 115.9 HP 113.7 TRW 117.1 BRW 114.0 TRW 117.3 BRW 114.3 FL 109.8 111.1± FL 109.0 FL 109.9 FL 109.4 FL 109.7 FL 110.3± FG 113.5± FL 110.1± A
- P/L Sound Wall Existing Ground 2'
2:1 MAX. Proposed Pad
2:1 2' Future Nelson (By Others)
Typical Section at Nelson Lane NTS Proposed Sidewalk
MAX. P/L Slope Varies Proposed Pad Street Typical Lot Grading NTS P/L Slope Varies Proposed Pad Street Typical Lot Grading - Modification 1 NTS Rear Yard 2' Bench P/L V-Ditch P/L2' 8' 2:11' 8' Trail 3:1 10.5' 6' 15' 2:1 2' P/L Pad Pad
CL P/L
CL Rear Drainage
Typical Open Space Swale / Treatment NTS 54' 1.5'
Max
Max
Max P/L2' 8' 1' 8' TRAIL 1.5' 10.5' 6' 15' 2' Pad P/L
2:1
3:1
2:1 54'
4'

3.5' Detail A NTS
Max
Max
Max Pad
3:1
2:1 2% 3' 4' EP5%Detail B NTS
Max
Max
Existing Ground
3:1 2% EP 3' 5% Existing Ground Detail C NTSMax

FIDDYMENT ROAD
FDG
N
W
S
E Windsor Cove Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan Tentative Subdivision Map SHEET 4 OF 4 NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. 2. THE PROPOSED UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE SHOWN ARE TENTATIVE AND ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION. 3. PROPOSED GRADES ARE TENTATIVE AND ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION AT FINAL DESIGN. 4. FUTURE BACKBONE STORM DRAIN PER VILLAGE 5 SPECIFIC PLAN. 5. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS TURN AROUND, FINAL DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING STAGE. 6. ALL STORM DRAIN PIPES GREATER THAN 12" ARE LABELED. 7. SEE DETAIL 4 ON SHEET 2 FOR UTILITY SEPARATION. 8. DESIGN OF OUTFALL STRUCTURES & CULVERTS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE FINAL DRAINAGE ANALYSIS, LEGEND FEATURE EXISTING PROPOSED STORM DRAIN (SIZE INDICATED) DROP INLET/CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 12"SD OAK TREE TO BE REMOVED OAK TREE TO REMAIN GRADING QUANTITY ESTIMATES AMOUNT OF CUT: 129,000 ± CU. YDS. AMOUNT OF FILL: 111,000 ± CU. YDS. SHRINKAGE 20%: 24,000 ± CU. YDS. ESTIMATED NET IMPORT: 14,000 ± CU. YDS. 12"SD PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT APN: 021-049-002 APN: 021-050-011 APN: 021-050-001 APN: 021-049-009 APN: 021-049-003 APN: 021-049-004 APN: 021-049-005 APN: 021-049-006 APN: 021-049-007 APN: 021-028-003 (CITY OF LINCOLN) APN: 021-028-007 RAVINE
AUBURN MOORE ROAD (FUTURE FERRARI RANCH ROAD) FUTURE 12"SD STORM DRAIN RISER EXISTING WETLANDS DITCH/SWALE EX 100 YEAR HGL
ELEV. (110.5)
100 YEAR HGL
ELEV. (109.2)
EX 100 YEAR HGL ELEV. (111.2)
EX 100 YEAR HGL
ELEV. (111.8)
EX 100 YEAR HGL ELEV. (114.3)
100 YEAR HGL
ELEV. (115.2)
City of Lincoln, California June 1, 2026
0 100' 200' 300' SCALE 1"=100'
I:\Drafting\21200-Moore_Road\Tentative Map\21200_TM-04-Grading [VCE Shift].dwg, 06/02/26 09:21:17am, Amohammed SHT4 See Detail A Hereon / Below Attachment 10 Exhibit C
601
SUBJECT: Village 7B Amendments Project (Mikaela Noble)
SUBMITTED BY: Mikaela Noble
DEPARTMENT: Community Development
DATE: July 28, 2026
Item Number 14.B
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council conduct a public hearing, consider the information contained in the staff report, the testimony of the public, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation of approval, and take the following actions:

1. Adopt Resolution adopting the proposed Addendum to the certified 2010 Village 7 Specific Plan EIR (SCH No. 2005062001) and to the 2017 Village 5 Specific Plan EIR (SCH No. 2014052071); and adopt updated Mitigation Monitoring Plans (MMPs) for the Village 7 Specific Plan EIR and Village 5 Specific Plan EIR for the Village 7B Amendments Project certifying that the changes will not result in any new significant information of substantial importance, new significant impacts, or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts that would require major revisions to the 2010 Village 7 Specific Plan EIR or the 2017 Village 5 Specific Plan EIR, and therefore, pursuant State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, the preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR is not required;

2. Adopt a Resolution approving the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment;

3. Adopt a Resolution approving the Village 5 Specific Plan Amendment;

4. Consider waiving first reading and introduce by title only an Ordinance amending the Village 7 General Development Plan;

5. Consider waiving first reading and introduce by title only an Ordinance amending the Village 5 General Development Plan; and

6. Adopt a Resolution authorizing the submittal of an application to the Placer County Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCo) for the formal annexation of a portion of the adopted Village 5 Specific Plan area and a portion of the adopted Village 7 Specific Plan area.

BACKGROUND/INTRODUCTION:

The project site is encompassed within unincorporated portions of the adopted Village 7 and Village 5 Specific Plans located in the western area of Placer County, immediately northwest of the current border of the City of Lincoln (see Attachment 1). The approximately 231.2-acre project site, consisting of parcels identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 021-263- 006, 021-350-006, -023, -027, -038, -039, -040, and -046, is generally located northwest of the Moore Road and Sorrento Parkway intersection, south of State Route 65. The proposed

STAFF REPORT
602
project includes land use plan modifications to approximately 147.7 acres of the Village 7 Specific Plan area and 34 acres of the Village 5 Specific Plan area, located northwest of the Moore Road and Sorrento Parkway intersection. In addition, the project includes minor modifications within an approximately 49.5-acre portion in the Village 7 Specific Plan area, located south of Moore Road, consisting of parcels identified as APNs 021-263-014, -022, and -023.

The project site is predominantly undeveloped and consists of agricultural fields, with a rural residence located in the northeast corner of the site. The site is surrounded by the Auburn Ravine to the north; existing rural residences to the east; undeveloped land within the Village 7 Specific Plan area to the south; and rural residences, the City of Lincoln Wastewater Treatment and Reclamation Facility (WWTRF), and undeveloped land within the Village 5 Specific Plan area to the west.

Planning Commission Action
The City of Lincoln Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed project on Wednesday, June 17, 2026.

Two members of the public expressed concerns with residential development located near the Lincoln Regional Airport and near the commenter’s property. Potential impacts to views from nearby residences were evaluated as part of the initial Village 7 Specific Plan and Village 5 Specific Plan approvals. The Addendum prepared for the proposed project determined that the proposed project would not result in adverse impacts related to aesthetics and visual resources beyond what was analyzed in the Village 7 Specific Plan EIR and the Village 5 Specific Plan EIR. Staff provided clarification that on March 25, 2026, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) considered the proposed project at a public hearing and determined the proposed project was in compliance with the Lincoln Regional Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP).

In addition, one Planning Commissioner requested clarification regarding the use of an addendum as the appropriate environmental document, specifically in relation to the increase in units within Village 7 and potential traffic impacts. Staff provided clarification by explaining that although the residential unit count would increase, and although traffic volumes would be expected to increase, the impacts would not result in a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts, because the traffic impacts in question were already determined to be significant by the 2010 EIR. Ultimately, the Planning Commission recommended, by a 5-0-0-1 vote, that the City Council approve all requested entitlements.

Existing Land Use and Zoning Designations
The portion of the site within the Village 7 Specific Plan, including the area south of Moore Road, is designated as Village Low Density Residential (VLDR), Village Medium Density Residential (VMDR), Village High Density Residential (VHDR), Village Open Space (VOS), Village Parks and Recreation (VPR), and Linear Park (LP). The portion of the site within the Village 5 Specific Plan is designated as Village Rural Residential (VRR), Village Natural Open Space (VOSN), Major Right of Way (ROW), and Village Open Space Preserve (VOSP) (see Attachment 2). The project site is zoned Planned Unit Development (PD) pursuant to the adopted Village 7 and Village 5 General Development Plans (GDP).

Village 7 Specific Plan
In June 2010, the City of Lincoln adopted the Village 7 Specific Plan and certified the Village 7 603
Specific Plan EIR (State Clearinghouse (SCH) No. 2005062001), which analyzed the project specific and cumulative physical impacts of development of 3,285 residential units and 125,000 square feet of commercial development in the approximately 703-acre Village 7 Specific Plan area.

In August 2013, a Development Agreement was executed between the City of Lincoln and Lincoln Land Holdings, LLC. for development of the 516 acres (Lewis Property) within the Village 7 Specific Plan area. The City Council determined that the Village 7 Specific Plan EIR was adequate and complete, and that further environmental documentation related to the Development Agreement was not necessary given that the conditions of the agreement were consistent with the scope of the EIR. Subsequent to approval of the Village 7 Specific Plan and certification of the Village 7 EIR, the Placer County LAFCo proceeded with annexation of the 516-acre Lewis Property of the Village 7 Specific Plan area into the City of Lincoln.

In 2016, Lewis Planned Communities requested amendments to the Village 7 Specific Plan and approval of a Small Lot Vesting Tentative Map for Phase 1 of the Specific Plan. In general, the requested amendments reconfigured land uses by consolidating residential and park uses within Phase 1 of the project, while maintaining a consistent number of dwelling units in the Specific Plan. As a result, the 2013 Development Agreement was amended to reflect the changes and was approved in January 2017. Subsequent environmental documentation was completed in September 2016, which determined that the amendments would not result in any new significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in the Village 7 Specific Plan EIR.

In 2022, amendments were proposed to the previously approved 2016 Phase 1 Vesting Tentative Map and other related entitlements to accomplish the following: incorporate new single-family residential lot sizes; reduce the number of residential lots per unit/village to be developed within the Phase 1 Development Area; and maintain the previously approved land uses and residential density types, and the locations and sizes of the parks and major residential paseos. An Addendum to the Village 7 Specific Plan EIR was prepared to evaluate the 2022 amendments. The total unit count to be developed within the Phase 1 development area increased from 539 to 565. The proposed amendment to the Phase 1 Vesting Tentative Map also required an amendment to the previously approved Village 7 GDP and Development Agreement between the City of Lincoln and Lincoln Land Holdings LLC (Lewis Communities).

The City of Lincoln approved the requested entitlements and adopted the associated Addendum in August 2022.

In 2024, additional amendments were proposed to the Village 7 Specific Plan and GDP. The 2024 amendments included revised land use designations for the Village Mixed Use (VMU) parcel at the northwest corner of Ferrari Ranch Road and Central Boulevard, as well as minor adjustments to residential, parks and open space configurations throughout the plan, and changes to development processing methods involving entitlement modifications. A second Addendum to the Village 7 Specific Plan EIR was prepared to evaluate the 2024 amendments. The City of Lincoln approved the requested entitlements and adopted the associated Addendum in April 2024.

In 2025, the City of Lincoln approved the two minor amendments to the Village 7 Specific Plan and GDP which replaced approximately 7.6 acres of VPR with VLDR and changed the location of the elementary school site from the southeast corner to the northeast corner of the Ferrari Ranch Road and Western Boulevard intersection.
604
The Village 7 Specific Plan EIR is both a Program EIR and Project EIR, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15168 and 15161. The portions of the Village 7 Specific Plan area under consideration for the current amendments were addressed at a program level in the Village 7 Specific Plan EIR. As part of the Village 7 Specific Plan EIR approval, the City adopted a Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP), which includes all mitigation measures identified in the certified EIR. All subsequent projects within the Village 7 Specific Plan area, including the 147.7-acre portion of proposed project, would be responsible for implementing all applicable mitigation contained in the MMP.

Village 5 Specific Plan
In November 2017, the City of Lincoln adopted the Village 5 Specific Plan and certified the Village 5 Specific Plan EIR (SCH No. 2014052071), which analyzed the project specific and cumulative physical impacts of the development of 8,206 residential units and over 4.5 million square feet of non-residential development in the approximately 4,785-acre Village 5 Specific Plan area.

In 2024, approximately 2,721 acres of the Village 5 Specific Plan area (designated as Village 5A) were annexed into the City of Lincoln. The remaining areas of the Village 5 Specific Plan area, including the 34-acre portion associated with this proposed project, have not yet been annexed into the City of Lincoln.

The Village 5 Specific Plan EIR is both a Program EIR and Project EIR, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15168 and 15161. The portions of the Village 5 Specific Plan area under consideration for the current amendments were addressed at a program level in the Village 5 Specific Plan EIR. As part of the Village 5 Specific Plan EIR approval, the City adopted an MMP, which includes all mitigation measures identified in the certified EIR. All subsequent projects within the Village 5 Specific Plan area, including the 34-acre portion of the proposed project, would be responsible for implementing all applicable mitigation contained in the MMP.

Project Description
The Village 7B Amendment Project (proposed project) includes a request to amend the Village 7 Specific Plan and GDP, as well as amend the Village 5 Specific Plan and GDP. The proposed land use designation changes would increase the number of allowable residential units within a portion of the Village 7 Specific Plan area from 570 to 1,205 units. In addition, the proposed project would include amendments to the Village 5 Specific Plan that would increase the number of allowable units within the 34-acre Village 5 portion of the project site from seven to 30 units. The proposed land use modifications are shown in further detail in Table 1 and Attachment 3. Future tentative map approvals would be needed prior to development. The Development Agreement associated with the Lewis Property would be amended at a future date to account for the proposed amendments.

Table 1
Proposed Project Land Use Summary
Land Use Existing Proposed Change
Village 7
Village Country Estates
(VCE)
Acres 0 4.0 +4.0
Units 0 11 +11
Village Low Density Acres 60.4 23.6 -36.8
605
Residential (VLDR) Units 332 140 -192
Village Medium Density
Residential (VMDR)
Acres 22.8 33.9 +11.1
Units 238 314 +76
Village Medium High
Density Residential
(VMHDR)
Acres 0 41.1 +41.1
Units 0 740 +740
Village Mixed Use (VMU)
Acres 0 4.1 +4.1
Square
Feet
0 20,000 +20,000
Village Parks and
Recreation (VPR)
Acres 8.0 5.3 -2.7
Village Open Space (VOS) Acres 51.7 28.9 -22.8
Right-of-Way (ROW) Acres 4.8 6.8 +2.0
Total Units 570 1,205 +635
Village 5
Village Rural Residential
(VRR)
Acres 15.8 0 -15.8
Units 7 0 -7
Village Low Density
Residential (VLDR)
Acres 0 5.1 +5.1
Units 0 30 +30
Village Parks and
Recreation (VPR)
Acres 0 9.2 +9.2
Village Open Space
Preserve/Village Open
Space Natural
(VOSP/VOSN)
Acres 18.2 19.7 +1.5
Total Units 7 30 +23
Village 7 (Minor Modifications South of Moore Road)
Village Low Density
Residential (VLDR)
Acres 11.1 11.6 +0.5
Units 65 68 +3
Village Medium Density
Residential (VMDR)
Acres 9.6 9.4 -0.2
Units 124 121 -3
Village High Density
Residential (VHDR)
Acres 2.8 3.0 +0.2
Units 70 75 +5
Village Parks and
Recreation (VPR)
Acres 8.6 6.6 -2.0
Total Units 259 264 +5
As discussed above, the project site consists of approximately 147.7 acres of the total Village 7 Specific Plan area and 34 acres of the Village 5 Specific Plan area. The existing and approved land uses in the remaining areas of the Village 5 Specific Plan area would remain as is. Generally, the proposed project would modify land use designations to allow for higher residential density within the project site. The proposed project would also introduce 41.1 acres of Village Medium-High Density Residential (VMHDR) to the Village 7 portion of the project site, a new land use designation, which would allow for a greater range of residential 606
densities permitted within such areas (between 6.0 and 18.0 dwelling units per acre [du/ac]) to allow the future development increased flexibility to respond to market demands at time of future construction. The overall density in the project site would increase, and the number of units in the Village 7 portion of the project site would increase from 570 to 1,205, a net increase within the project site of 635 units. Due to land use changes and unit count reductions elsewhere in the Village 7 plan area, the overall Village 7 unit count would increase by 503 units, from 3,285 to 3,788. The proposed project would remain consistent with the City of Lincoln General Plan.

The proposed project would include the submittal of an application to the Placer County LAFCo for the annexation of the 147.7-acre portion of Village 7 and the 34-acre portion of Village 5 into the City of Lincoln. The remaining 49.5-acre portion of Village 7 has already been annexed into the City of Lincoln.

Proposed Residential Uses
The proposed project would introduce one new residential land use designation (VMHDR) and include the following residential land use designations:

Village 5:

VRR: The VRR land use designation allows for a density of 0.2 to 0.5 du/ac. The VRR designation is intended for large rural residential development including single family dwellings, accessory dwellings, and structures such as barns.

VLDR: The VLDR land use designation is intended for single-family detached homes on standard or alley-loaded lots, with a density range of 3.0 to 5.9 du/ac.

Village 7:

VCE: The VCE designation allows for single-family detached homes on large lots, with a density range of one to 2.9 du/ac.

VLDR: The VLDR designation allows for single -family detached homes on standard or alley-loaded lots, with a density range of 3.0 to 5.9 du/ac.

VMDR: The VMDR designation allows for single-family detached housing, as well as alternative detached and attached housing types. Such housing types may include, but are not limited to, standard or alley loaded lots, courtyard lots, green court lots, auto courts, alley clusters, petite, or cottage lots, garden lots, patio lots, zero-lot lines, zshaped lots, duet/half plex homes, brownstones, townhomes, or condominiums. The density range for the VMDR designation is 6.0 to 12.9 du/ac.

VMHDR: The proposed project would create the new VMHDR designation, which would allow for single -family detached housing, as well as alternative detached and attached housing types. Such housing types may include, but are not limited to, standard or alley loaded lots, courtyard lots, green court lots, auto courts, alley clusters, petite, or cottage lots, garden lots, patio lots, zero-lot lines, z-shaped lots, duet/half plex homes, brownstones, townhomes, or condominiums. It is possible that newer product types including detached residential units will be included as part of the VMHDR area. The VMHDR designation would allow a density range of 6.0 to 18 du/ac. A mix of for-sale and rental opportunities could occur in the VMHDR area.

Site Access and Circulation
The proposed project would not include significant changes to any planned roadways or associated improvements needed to serve buildout of the project site. Access to the project site would be provided by Moore Road and Central Boulevard. In addition, as part of the 607
proposed project, Central Boulevard would be extended into the project site as a ROW designation. Further review of site access and circulation would occur at the time of the future map entitlements.

Utilities
The proposed project would not include any significant changes to the planned backbone utilities required to serve the project site. However, the proposed project would include minor adjustments to the layout for water, sewer, and storm drainage utility systems and related facilities in order to accommodate the proposed land use changes. Further review of utilities would occur at the time of the future map entitlements.

Open Space and Parks
The proposed project would include a network of open space, parks, and paseos throughout the project site. The proposed network of paseos would continue to provide connectivity between residential areas, parks, and open space areas. The proposed land use plan would provide opportunities for future residents to access trails, green spaces, and larger areas of open space along Auburn Ravine (see Attachment 3).

As a part of the proposed project's on-going participation with the Placer County Conservation Program (PCCP) for preservation of high -quality open space lands, and to offset the reduced acreage of PCCP-deemed lesser quality open space located within the project site, approximately 29.1 acres of additional open space (including 9.2 acres of parkland dedication) are provided in the Lincoln Village 5 Specific Plan Area, adjacent to the Lincoln Village 7 Specific Plan Area boundary. Portions of the 29.1-acre open space area have been redesignated and re-zoned via separate and concurrent Specific Plan and GDP Amendments.

Additionally, as a component of the Village 7 Specific Plan, a 162.0-acre offsite preserve was established as a conservation easement within the City of Lincoln WWTRF immediately west of the plan area (Attachment 4). The establishment of the preserve was required to mitigate wetland and species impacts associated with the development of Village 7. While the preserve area is not a part of an existing or planned specific plan area, the preserve area contributes to the Village 7 total open space allocation of 50.7 percent which exceeds the required 40 percent of allocated open space.

The Village 5 portion of the project site would include changes to open space and park land use designations resulting in approximately 10.7 acres of additional parks and open space.

Agricultural Overlay
In September 2021, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1041B establishing an Agricultural Overlay (AO) zone within Village 7 (Attachment 5). The AO zone would allow for the continuation of agricultural uses and agricultural support uses. Any use not listed as allowed in the AO Zone pursuant to Section 4.5.3 of the Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, but that is existing and allowed at the time of annexation of the property, would be allowed to continue as a conforming use under the AO zone. It is the intent of the Village 7 GDP to allow agricultural uses existing at the time of annexation to continue on an interim basis or in perpetuity, concurrent with development of the Specific Plan land uses.

Due to an administrative oversight, the AO zone text language was not added into the Village 7 GDP. Therefore, the text language has been added to the Village 7 GDP as part of this application. As the AO Ordinance was previously adopted by City Council, this item is not 608
being considered for review.

FINDINGS/ANALYSIS:

As mentioned above, the proposed project would increase the total unit count within the project site by 658 from what was previously approved. As mentioned previously, due to land use changes and unit count reductions elsewhere in the Village 7 plan area, the overall unit count would increase by 503 units within the entire Village 7 Specific Plan area. In addition, the density mix of the residential uses, as well as the acreage of commercial, open space and parks, and public uses would change. As seen in Attachment 3, the proposed amendment would create the VMHDR designation and allow for a greater range of residential densities in areas designated VMHDR. The creation of the VMHDR designation would allow greater flexibility for the future development of the project site.

Traffic Analysis
In compliance with the City of Lincoln General Plan, a Local Transportation Analysis (LTA) was prepared for the project (Attachment 6). The goal of the City of Lincoln is to maintain a Level of Service (LOS) C at all signalized intersections in the City during the PM peak hours, maintain a minimum LOS D for State Route (SR) 65 and SR 193, and identify and monitor critical intersections on a periodic basis and construct needed improvements in a timely manner. LOS is a scale that describes traffic flow with six ratings ranging from A to F, with “A” indicating relatively free flow of traffic and “F” indicating stop-and-go traffic characterized by traffic jams. The LTA examines the potential effects of the proposed project on the surrounding roadway network, including peak hour vehicle delay and LOS at nearby intersections. Findings were assessed with respect to roadway operations, intersection performance, and consistency with applicable City of Lincoln transportation policies, including Policies T-2.3, T-2.4, T-2.5.

As discussed within the LTA, the Ferrari Ranch Road and Caledon Circle intersection, Ferrari Ranch Road and Groveland Lane intersection, and Moore Boulevard/Ferrari Ranch Road/Shallus Boulevard intersection would operate at unacceptable LOS conditions under the proposed project. Such impacts were assessed at a cumulative level, including projections for buildout of the proposed project as well as the remaining portions of the Village 7 Specific Plan area and future buildout within the City. The LTA included recommended off-site improvements to enhance operations at the intersections that are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS under the Cumulative Plus Proposed Project condition. Such improvements include upgrades to the Ferrari Ranch Road and Caledon Circle intersection and the Ferrari Ranch Road and Groveland Lane intersection.

Improvements to the Ferrari Ranch Road and Caledon Circle intersection would decrease delay at the intersection back to conditions that are expected under the approved Village 7 Specific Plan. Improvements at the Ferrari Ranch Road and Groveland Lane intersection would decrease delay at the intersection to an acceptable LOS. The aforementioned improvements are included as Conditions of Approval (COAs) and are to be implemented with submittal of future tentative maps associated with the proposed project.

For the Moore Road/Ferrari Ranch Road/Shallus Boulevard intersection, Fehr & Peers’ evaluation of alternative intersection control strategies in the LTA demonstrated that a roundabout would provide preferable operational performance and safety benefits relative to signalized or all-way stop control and is therefore identified as the preferred long-term control.

Notwithstanding, the ultimate form of traffic control at this intersection should be determined at a later date when the project applicant submits a tentative map to the City. The reason being is 609
that there are areas of uncertainty at this time (as explained on page 24 of the LTA). A COA has been included to require additional traffic analysis for the Moore Road/Ferrari Ranch Road/Shallus Boulevard intersection, in conjunction with submittal of the first tentative map for the Village 7B project, to determine the appropriate form of traffic control based on thencurrent land use and traffic conditions.

Consistency Analysis
As shown below, the proposed Specific Plan Amendments and GDP Amendments would align with the City of Lincoln General Plan, the Village 7 Specific Plan Policies, and the Village 5 Specific Plan and Policies.

General Plan
The 2050 City of Lincoln General Plan serves as the guiding land use document for the City of Lincoln. In addition to providing land use designations, goals, and policies for the City as a whole, the General Plan provides direction for several large areas that were undeveloped when the General Plan was adopted, including Village 7 and Village 5.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendments and GDP Amendments are consistent with the applicable policies of the 2050 General Plan as outlined below.

Village General Plan Policies
Section 4.4 of the General Plan discusses specific policies related to future development of Villages within the City’s Sphere of Influence. The proposed project is consistent with the applicable policies as follows:

A. The Village 5 Specific Plan, as amended, would result in minor land use changes as compared to the approved Village 5 Specific Plan, and would continue to comply with all Village-specific policies from the City’s General Plan related to land use.

B. A Specific Plan has been adopted for Village 7 and Village 5, consistent with Policy LU15.1.

C. The Village 7 Specific Plan and Village 5 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to provide the components identified in Policy LU-15.2, including a centrally located Mixed Use Village Center.

D. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to allow for a range of residential densities, from 1 to 25 units per acre, similar to the adopted Specific Plan (Policies LU-15.3 and LU-15.4).

E. The Village 5 and Village 7 Specific Plans, as amended, would continue to provide a mix of land uses, preserve open spaces and include design measures to minimize conflicts with agricultural uses (Policies LU-15.4 and LU-2.6).

F. The circulation plans for the Village 5 and Village 7 Specific Plans would continue to provide connectivity to the developed portions of the City, including roads, transit corridors and pedestrian linkages (Policy LU-15.5).

G. Parks and open space comprise a significant portion of the overall Village 7 Specific Plan. Approximately 35 percent of the overall Village 7 area would be devoted to varied park and open space amenities including a community park, neighborhood parks, mini parks, open space areas (natural open space, linear parkways, and paseos), and other elements. As a component of the overall Village 7 Specific Plan, a 162.0-acre off-site preserve was established immediately west of the plan area and north of the City of Lincoln WWTRF. The establishment of the preserve was required to mitigate wetland and species impacts associated with the development of Village 7. The preserve area is not a part of an existing or planned specific plan area but contributes to the Village 7 610
total open space allocation of 50.7 percent, which exceeds the 40 percent of allocated open space (Policy LU-15.14). Within Village 5, the proposed project would increase VPR by 9.2 acres and VOSP/VOSN by 1.5 acres. The open space areas and the parks within each neighborhood would be interconnected by a network of pedestrian and bicycle routes. The park and open space amenities would continue to be provided with both amended Specific Plans (Policies LU-15.12 through LU-15.18).

Other General Plan Policies
A. The Village 5 Specific Plan, as amended, would not result in significant land use changes in comparison to the approved Village 5 Specific Plan, and would continue to comply with all applicable policies from the City’s General Plan.

B. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would provide for a wide range of residential units, densities and housing choices, as well as mixed uses (Policies LU-1.1, LU-1.7, LU-1.8, LU-1.10, and LU-3.2).

C. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to provide buffers between development and significant watercourses, riparian vegetation and wetlands, and preserve the natural edges along these areas (Policies LU-1.4 and LU-12.4).

D. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would increase the housing stock and diversity in the City by developing 1,205 new residential units, including low density, medium density, and medium-high density units (Housing Element Policy 2 and General Plan Policy LU-1.7).

E. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would decrease the amount of open space and developed parkland in the City, but would continue to require the payment of applicable park fees and increase connectivity within the project area through paseo linkages. Furthermore, replacement parkland consisting of a 162.0-acre off-site preserve located immediately west of the plan area and north of the City of Lincoln WWTRF has been established to provide open space and recreation opportunities for the enjoyment and well-being of local residents. The establishment of the preserve was required to mitigate wetland and species impacts associated with the development of Village 7 (Policies LU-1.11, LU-9.4, LU-12.7, LU-15.17 and LU- 15.18).

F. The amended circulation system within Village 7 would provide similar levels of service (Policy T-2.3) to the adopted Specific Plan, along with facilities for pedestrians, bicycling, and connections between land uses, consistent with General Plan Policy LU-1.6, Goal T5 and related policies that address bicycle and trail circulation (Policies LU-9.4, T-5.6, T5.7, T-5.9, and OSC-7.20).

G. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to preserve and protect existing biological resources including both wildlife and vegetative habitat, including oak trees, wetlands, and open space in the vicinity of Auburn Ravine (Policies LU-1.11, OSC-1.3, OSC-5.1 OSC-5.2 and OSC-5.6.)
H. The Village 7 Specific Plan would continue to require that appropriate design measures and mitigation measures are implemented in order to minimize drainage concentrations and impervious coverage, and to provide flood protection (Policies OSC-1.4, OSC-4.4, and PFS-4.2). In addition, low impact development and best management practices would continue to be required to protect water quality (Policies OSC-1.6, OSC-4.3 and OSC-4.6).

I. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to provide buffers between the plan area and adjacent agricultural operations, and to implement mitigation requiring that purchasers of residences in proximity to agricultural operations be notified of the County’s right-to-farm ordinance. The Agricultural Overlay Zone, established for the Village 7 Specific Plan area in 2021, allows agricultural uses existing at the time of 611
annexation to continue on an interim basis or in perpetuity, concurrent with development of the Specific Plan land uses (Policies OSC-2.1 and OSC-2.2).

J. As discussed in detail above, findings within the LTA prepared for the proposed project were assessed with respect to roadway operations, intersection performance, and consistency with applicable City of Lincoln transportation policies, including Policies T2.3, T-2.4, T-2.5. The proposed project would comply with the applicable transportation policies through implementation of the roadway improvements discussed above.

The Village 7 and 5 Specific Plans state that amendments to the Specific Plans shall be processed in the same manner as the initial Specific Plan adoptions, requiring review by the Planning Commission and action by the City Council. In addition, the proposed amendments to the land use maps will retain the types of land uses and the residential densities and will be consistent with General Plan goals and policies pertaining to Village 7.

Village 7 Specific Plan Policies
The proposed project does not include any amendments to the goals or policies of the Village 7 Specific Plan. Therefore, if the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is approved, the Village 7 Specific Plan would continue to be consistent with adopted goals and policies, as summarized below:

A. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to allow a mix of residential and commercial uses, as well as parks and recreation facilities, school facilities, and open space, consistent with Section 4, Land Use Plan.

B. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to provide a multi-modal circulation network, and require construction of roadway and frontage improvements as specified in Section 5, Mobility Plan, including vehicle travel lanes, bike/NEV lanes, sidewalks, multi-use trails.

C. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to require adequate water, sewer and dry utilities systems and drainage facilities as indicated by Section 7, Utilities Plan.

D. The Village 7 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to provide for parks and recreation facilities, as well as open space, consistent with Section 6, Public Services Plan and Section 8, Resource Management Plan.

E. Consistent with Section 8, Resource Management Plan, the proposed Village 7 Specific Plan would continue to protect wetlands and other sensitive habits, as well as cultural resources, in open space areas.

Village 5 Specific Plan Policies
The proposed project does not include any amendments to the goals or policies of the Village 5 Specific Plan. Therefore, if the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is approved, the Village 5 Specific Plan would continue to be consistent with adopted goals and policies, as summarized below:

A. The Village 5 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to allow a mix of residential and commercial uses, as well as parks and recreation facilities, school facilities, and open space, consistent with Section 4, Land Use Plan.

B. The Village 5 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to provide a multi-modal circulation network, and require construction of roadway and frontage improvements as specified in Section 5, Circulation and Mobility, including vehicle travel lanes, bike/neighborhood electric vehicle (NEV) lanes, sidewalks, and multi-use trails.

C. The Village 5 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to require adequate water, sewer and dry utilities systems and drainage facilities as indicated by Section 7, Public 612
Utilities.

D. The Village 5 Specific Plan, as amended, would continue to provide for parks and recreation facilities, as well as open space, consistent with Section 6, Public Services and Section 8, Resources and Sustainability.

E. Consistent with Section 8, Resources and Sustainability, the proposed Village 5 Specific Plan would continue to protect wetlands and other sensitive habits, as well as cultural resources, in open space areas.

Placer County Transportation Planning Agency
The proposed project was reviewed by the PCTPA for compliance with the Lincoln Regional ALUCP. The proposed project is located within the Lincoln Regional Airport Influence Area.

ALUCP Policy 2.4.1(a)(3) references Public Utilities Code Section 21676(b), which states the following:

Prior to the amendment of a general plan or specific plan, or the adoption or approval of a zoning ordinance or building regulation within the planning boundary established by the airport land use commission pursuant to Section 21675, the local agency shall first refer the proposed action to the commission.

On March 25, 2026, the PCTPA Airport Land Use Commission held a public hearing and determined that the proposed specific plan amendments are consistent with the ALUCP.

Public Notice
Pursuant to Lincoln Municipal Code Section 18.92.040 and CA Government Code Section 65854(b)(2), a notice of the time and place of the City Council’s hearing, including a general explanation of the proposed Village 7B Amendments Project, was published in a newspaper of general circulation at least twenty calendar days before the hearing. In addition to notice by publication pursuant to CA Government Code, the City Council provided mailed notice to property owners within the Village 7 and Village 5 Specific Plan Areas, neighboring property owners, and local agencies responsible for essential facilities or services to the Plan Area in accordance with CA Government Code Section 65091. As of the writing of this report, staff has not received any opposition to the proposed project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed modifications to the approved Village 7 and Village 5 Specific Plans would not trigger the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162; and thus, a subsequent EIR or supplement to the certified EIRs is not required. Therefore, an Addendum to the certified EIRs has been prepared (Attachment 7, Exhibit A). The Addendum includes four new mitigation measures as part of the Village 7 EIR, related to biological resources and tribal cultural resources, and four new mitigation measures as part of the Village 5 EIR, related to biological resources and tribal cultural resources. The mitigation measures related to tribal cultural resources were added following the United Auburn Indian Community’s (UAIC) request to conduct tribal consultation during ground-disturbing activities within the project site, as described in further detail below. The new mitigation measures related to biological resources were added to address potential impacts to Crotch’s bumble bee and special-status bat species. The new mitigation measures would ensure that new significant impacts would not occur as compared to what was identified in the Village 5 and Village 7 EIRs.

The proposed changes would not result in any new significant information of substantial importance, new environmental impacts, new or revised alternatives, or a substantial increase 613
in the severity of previously identified significant impacts that would require major revisions to the original Village 7 or Village 5 EIRs. Considering the quality of the certified Village 7 and Village 5 EIRs, the nature of the underlying projects approved in 2010 and 2017, and the limited nature of the proposed changes to those approved projects, the City of Lincoln has determined that the Village 7 EIR and Village 5 EIR remain relevant to the proposal. The Addendum and related attachments constitute substantial evidence that none of the conditions identified in Section 15162 are present, and therefore the preparation of an additional supplemental or subsequent EIR is not required prior to approval of the proposed entitlements.

Tribal Consultation
Pursuant to SB 18, in September 2025, the City of Lincoln notified the following five tribes of the proposed amendments to the Village 7 Specific Plan and GDP and the Village 5 Specific Plan and GDP: The UAIC, Colfax-Todds Valley Consolidated Tribe, Nevada City Rancheria Nisenan Tribe, Tsi Akim Maidu, and Wilton Rancheria. Of the foregoing tribes, only the UAIC requested consultation. The UAIC responded with a request for a tribal monitor to be present during grading activities occurring within the Village 7B project site, which is located within portions of both Village 5 and Village 7. As such, a new project-specific mitigation measure has been added to ensure that the UAIC’s request is incorporated. Implementation of the mitigation measure, in addition to the applicable measures from the Village 7 and Village 5 EIRs, would ensure that potential impacts to tribal cultural resources within the Village 7 and Village 5 areas of the project site would be less than significant. With the inclusion of additional mitigation measures, tribal consultation was closed on June 24, 2026.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 Regional Project Site Location
Attachment 2 Existing Land Use Designations
Attachment 3 Proposed Land Use Designations
Attachment 4 Off-site Preserve Location (Conservation Easement) Attachment 5 Ordinance 1041B Agricultural Overlay
Attachment 6 Local Transportation Analysis
Attachment 7 Village 7B Addendum Resolution.docx
Attachment 7 Village 7B Addendum Resolution Exhibits
Attachment 8 Village 7 SPA Resolution.docx
Attachment 8 Village 7 SPA Resolution Exhibits.pdf
Attachment 9 Village 5 SPA Resolution.docx
Attachment 9 Village 5 SPA Resolution Exhibits.pdf
Attachment 10 Village 7 GDPA Ordinance.doc
614
Attachment 10 Village 7 GDPA Ordinance Exhibits.pdf
Attachment 11 Village 5 GDPA Ordinance.doc
Attachment 11 Village 5 GDPA Ordinance Exhibits.pdf
Attachment 12 V7B Annexation Authorization Resolution.docx Attachment 12 V7B Annexation Authorization Resolution Exhibits.pdf 615
Village 7B Amendment Project
Attachment 1 Regional Project Site Location
Project Site
616
Village 7B Amendment Project
Attachment 2 Existing Land Use Designations
Note: Project site boundaries are approximate.

Project
Site
Minor
Modifications
South of Moore
Road
Area not
included in the
project site
617
Village 7B Amendment Project
Attachment 3 Proposed Land Use Designations
Project
Site
Minor
Modifications
South of
Moore Road
Area not
included in
the project
site
Note: Project site boundaries are approximate.
618
619
Attachment 5 Ordinance 1041B Agricultural Overlay
620
Attachment 5 Ordinance 1041B Agricultural Overlay
621
Attachment 5 Ordinance 1041B Agricultural Overlay
622
Attachment 5 Ordinance 1041B Agricultural Overlay
623
Attachment 5 Ordinance 1041B Agricultural Overlay
624
Attachment 5 Ordinance 1041B Agricultural Overlay
625
Attachment 5 Ordinance 1041B Agricultural Overlay
626
Final
Village 7 Specific
Plan Amendment
Local Transportation Analysis
Prepared for: Submitted on:

Raney Planning & Management, Inc. April 2026
City of Lincoln
Attachment 6
627
Attachment 6
628
P
Table of Contents
I. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Proposed Amendment.......................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Analysis Methodology ................................................................................................................. 5 Analysis Scenarios and Locations ............................................................................................................................ 5 Intersection Operations Analysis.............................................................................................................................. 8 Travel Demand Forecasting....................................................................................................................................... 9 Performance Criteria.................................................................................................................................................... 9 III. Existing Conditions.................................................................................................................... 10 Data Collection............................................................................................................................................................. 10 Field Observations ........................................................................................................................................................11 Existing Analysis Results ........................................................................................................................................... 13 IV. Project Travel Characteristics ................................................................................................ 14 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................................................14 Trip Distribution...........................................................................................................................................................14 V. Cumulative Plus Project Conditions ........................................................................................ 15 Cumulative Plus Project Roadway Geometry .................................................................................................... 15 Cumulative Plus Project Analysis Results............................................................................................................ 18 Average Daily Traffic .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Sorrento Parkway Operations .........................................................................................................................20 Intersection Improvements .....................................................................................................................................22 Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard Evaluation......................................................22 Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Deficiencies..................................................................................25 VI. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................26 Attachment 6
629
Appendices
Appendix A. Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment – Consistency Review Memorandum Appendix B. Lincoln Village 7B Specific Plan Amendment – Project Travel Characteristics Memorandum
Appendix C. Count Data
Appendix D. Existing Conditions LOS Results
Appendix E. Cumulative Plus Project Conditions LOS Results Appendix F. Moore Rd / Ferrari Ranch Rd / Shallus Blvd Safety and Operations Results Appendix G. Cumulative Plus Project Conditions LOS Results for Intersection Improvements Attachment 6
630
List of Figures
Figure 1: Current Village 7 Specific Plan Site Plan......................................................................................................3 Figure 2: Proposed Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Site Plan ...................................................................... 4 Figure 3: Study Area and Analysis Intersections......................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4 School-related traffic queuing observed on Caledon Circle (East) at Ferrari Ranch Road during the AM peak period........................................................................................................................ 11 Figure 5: Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Existing Conditions................................ 12 Figure 6: Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations - Cumulative Plus Project Conditions . 17 Figure 7: AM Peak Hour Queuing on Sorrento Parkway at Ferrari Ranch Road without and with Amendment ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 8: AM Peak Hour Queuing on Sorrento Parkway at Portello Way-Lucca Road without and with Amendment ................................................................................................................................................... 21 Attachment 6
631
List of Tables
Table 1. Intersection Level of Service Definitions ...................................................................................................... 8 Table 2: Existing Average Daily Volumes..................................................................................................................... 11 Table 3. Peak Hour Intersection Operations-Existing Conditions ......................................................................13 Table 4. Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment - Changes in External Vehicle Trips.......................................14 Table 5. Peak Hour Intersection Operations-Cumulative Plus Project Conditions....................................... 19 Table 6: Cumulative Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes......................................................................20 Table 7. Traffic Control Strategy Predicted Crashes for Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard.......................................................................................................................................................23 Table 8: Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Control Results.............................................................................................................................................23 Table 9. Peak Hour Intersection Operations-Cumulative Plus Project Conditions with Improvements ...........................................................................................................................................................................25 Attachment 6
632
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 1
I. Introduction
This Local Transportation Analysis (LTA) has been prepared to evaluate the potential traffic effects associated with the proposed Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment (the "Amendment"). The analysis examines the potential effects of the proposed Amendment on the surrounding roadway network, including peak hour vehicle delay and level of service (LOS) at nearby intersections. Findings are assessed with respect to roadway operations, intersection performance, and consistency with applicable City of Lincoln transportation policies.

Project Description
The Village 7 Specific Plan area is located in the southwestern portion of the City of Lincoln, generally along both sides of Ferrari Ranch Road. The proposed Amendment applies to the northernmost portion of the Village 7 Specific Plan area, located north of Moore Road. This area consists of the Scheiber and Aitken Ranch II properties and is hereinafter referred to as the “Village 7B Area.” The Village 7B Area is currently undeveloped and would be connected to the remainder of the Village 7 Specific Plan area via Liberty Parkway and Moore Road. The Village 7 Specific Plan was originally adopted in 2009 and was subsequently updated in 2024 to reflect minor revisions to land use assumptions (hereinafter referred to as the “Current Village 7 Specific Plan”). Under the Current Village 7 Specific Plan, shown in Figure 1, development within the plan area includes the following land uses:

1. 1,181 low-density residential units

2. 1,529 medium-density residential units

3. 575 high-density residential units

4. One elementary school assumed in the Village 7 Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) to have a capacity of approximately 900 students

5. Approximately 4.9 acres of mixed-use commercial development, assumed in the DEIR to include a 15,000-square-foot community center

6. Approximately 58 acres of parks and recreation uses
Proposed Amendment
The proposed Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment would modify land use designations within the Village 7B Area. The Amendment would reduce the acreage designated for parks and recreation by approximately 2.7 acres and adjust the residential density of several parcels currently designated for residential development. The resulting net changes in land use, relative to the Current Village 7 Specific Plan, would include the following:

1. A reduction of 181 low-density residential units

2. An increase of 740 medium-high-density residential units

3. An increase of 69 medium-density residential units

4. An increase of 7 country estates residential units

5. An increase in community-serving uses through the addition of a 20,000-square-foot community center
The proposed Amendment would ultimately result in a net increase of 635 residential units compared to the Current Village 7 Specific Plan. All proposed land use changes would occur within the Scheiber Attachment 6
633
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 2
and Aitken Ranch II properties, located north of Moore Road. The changes in land use can be seen in Figure 2.

In addition to the modifications to the Scheiber and Aitken Ranch II properties, this Amendment also includes a small portion of Village 5 abutting the Aitken Ranch II and Schieber properties to the west that would change the planned seven units of Rural Residential to 30 units of Low Density Residential.

Attachment 6
634
Current Village 7 Specific Plan Site Plan
FIGURE 1
 &20081,7<'(6,*1)5$0(:25.
63(&,),&3/$1 )HEUXDU\ 
)LJXUH
,OOXVWUDWLYH/DQG8VH3ODQ
,
Separate Proposed
Annexation Area
3D SOUTH

SORRENTO

LINCOLN

CROSSING

AUBURN RAVINE

NORTH INGRAM SLOUGH

INGRAM SLOUGH

SOUTH INGRAM SLOUGH

MOORE ROAD

SHALLUS BOULEVARD

FERRARI RANCH ROAD

LIBERTY PARKWAY

MOORE ROAD

MOORE ROAD
VLDR

7.6 Ac
VLDR

25.1 Ac
VMDR

11.3 Ac
VMDR

6.3 Ac
VMU

4.9 Ac
VPR

10.4 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

5.1 Ac
VHDR

12.3 Ac
VLDR

40.9 Ac
VLDR

27.4 Ac
VLDR

14.0 Ac
VLDR

5.9 Ac
VMDR

18.6 Ac VMDR

12.3 Ac
VMDR

57.6 Ac
VPR

2.6 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
ES

16.6 Ac
VHDR

19.1 Ac
VLDR

12.4 Ac
VLDR

11.6 Ac
VMDR

12.1 Ac
VPR

3.8 Ac
VPR

1.6 Ac
VMDR

9.4 Ac
VOS

13.1 Ac
VOS

2.8 Ac
VOS
120.4 Ac
VCE

2.4 Ac
VLDR

6.4 Ac
VLDR

4.4 Ac VMHDR

14.4 Ac
VMU

4.1 Ac
VOS

10.8 Ac
VOS

0.9 Ac
VPR

5.3 Ac
VMDR

17.9 Ac VLDR

6.6 Ac
VMDR

8.0 Ac
VLDR

4.0 Ac VMHDR

10.6 Ac
VMHDR

12.5 Ac
VMDR

5.0 Ac
VLDR

3.7 Ac
VOS

7.3 Ac
VMDR

3.1 Ac
VMHDR

3.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

2.6 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.5 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP
LP 0.7 Ac

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.8 Ac
LP

0.6 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

2.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
LP

4.0 Ac
LP

2.0 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP

MP MP MP
MP

MP MP MP
Document Path: P:\18484\PLN\Applications\_2025_Scheiber_SP & GDP Revisions\FIGURES\CAD_GIS_Files\SP_Figure 4-1 Land Use Plan.mxd SP Figure 4-1: Land Use Plan
I
Legend
VOS - Open Space Preserve or Trail Corridor
VPR - Parks and Recreation
VOS/LP - Linear Parkways
VOS/MP - Major Paseos
VHDR - High Density Residential
VMHDR - Medium High Density Residential
VMDR - Medium Density Residential
VLDR - Low Density Residential
VCE - Country Estates
VMU - Neighborhood Commercial
ES - Elementary School
ROW - Major ROW
Bridge Spans
Attachment 6
635
Proposed Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Site Plan
FIGURE 2
,
Separate Proposed
Annexation Area
3D SOUTH

SORRENTO

LINCOLN

CROSSING

AUBURN RAVINE

NORTH INGRAM SLOUGH

INGRAM SLOUGH

SOUTH INGRAM SLOUGH

MOORE ROAD

SHALLUS BOULEVARD

FERRARI RANCH ROAD

LIBERTY PARKWAY

MOORE ROAD

MOORE ROAD
VLDR

7.6 Ac
VLDR

25.1 Ac
VMDR

11.3 Ac
VMDR

6.3 Ac
VMU

4.9 Ac
VPR

10.4 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

5.1 Ac
VHDR

12.3 Ac
VLDR

40.9 Ac
VLDR

27.4 Ac
VLDR

14.0 Ac
VLDR

5.9 Ac
VMDR

18.6 Ac VMDR

12.3 Ac
VMDR

57.6 Ac
VPR

2.6 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
ES

16.6 Ac
VHDR

19.1 Ac
VLDR

12.4 Ac
VLDR

11.6 Ac
VMDR

12.1 Ac
VPR

3.8 Ac
VPR

1.6 Ac
VMDR

9.4 Ac
VOS

13.1 Ac
VOS

2.8 Ac
VOS
120.4 Ac
VCE

2.4 Ac
VLDR

6.4 Ac
VLDR

4.4 Ac VMHDR

14.4 Ac
VMU

4.1 Ac
VOS

10.8 Ac
VOS

0.9 Ac
VPR

5.3 Ac
VMDR

17.9 Ac VLDR

6.6 Ac
VMDR

8.0 Ac
VLDR

4.0 Ac VMHDR

10.6 Ac
VMHDR

12.5 Ac
VMDR

5.0 Ac
VLDR

3.7 Ac
VOS

7.3 Ac
VMDR

3.1 Ac
VMHDR

3.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

2.6 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.5 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP
LP 0.7 Ac

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.8 Ac
LP

0.6 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

2.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
LP

4.0 Ac
LP

2.0 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP

MP MP MP
MP

MP MP MP
Document Path: P:\18484\PLN\Applications\_2025_Scheiber_SP & GDP Revisions\FIGURES\CAD_GIS_Files\SP_Figure 4-1 Land Use Plan.mxd SP Figure 4-1: Land Use Plan
I
Legend
VOS - Open Space Preserve or Trail Corridor
VPR - Parks and Recreation
VOS/LP - Linear Parkways
VOS/MP - Major Paseos
VHDR - High Density Residential
VMHDR - Medium High Density Residential
VMDR - Medium Density Residential
VLDR - Low Density Residential
VCE - Country Estates
VMU - Neighborhood Commercial
ES - Elementary School
ROW - Major ROW
Bridge Spans
Attachment 6
636
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 5
II. Analysis Methodology
This section describes the analysis scenarios and locations, analysis methods, and performance standards utilized in this study.

Analysis Scenarios and Locations
To evaluate the potential roadway effects of the proposed Amendment, this study analyzes two scenarios, each representing a distinct stage of development or planning horizon. • Existing Conditions reflects current (2025) traffic volumes, roadway geometrics, and intersection operations within the study area.
• Cumulative Plus Project (CPP) Conditions incorporates Amendment-generated trips alongside background traffic growth and trips from other approved developments in the area, representing a long-term buildout condition and assessing cumulative conditions consistent with City of Lincoln transportation policies.1
Existing Conditions documents how the transportation system operates today and to establish a baseline for further scenarios to compare to. Cumulative Plus Project Conditions represent the long-term vision for growth in the study area and are used to identify transportation facilities anticipated to operate at unacceptable levels assuming full buildout. To the extent to which there were any deficient locations, the Amendment’s contribution toward the deficient location via the Amendment’s incremental change in delay shown in “Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment – Consistency Review” dated February 13, 2026 and included in Appendix A.

Figure 3 displays the locations of the study intersections, which were selected in consultation with City of Lincoln staff and based on the Amendment’s expected travel characteristics (i.e., project location and amount of project trips) as well as facilities susceptible to being affected by the Amendment. The analysis includes the following 21 intersections, 14 of which exist today.

1. Moore Road / Fiddyment Road (Moore Road / Fiddyment Road / Nelson Lane under cumulative only)

2. Moore Road / Nelson Lane (existing only)

3. Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Cir (West)

4. Sorrento Parkway /Moore Road

5. Sorrento Parkway / Marina Grande Way/Torino Way

6. Sorrento Parkway / Portello Way/Lucca Ln

7. Sorrento Parkway / Benvenito Ln

8. Ferrari Ranch Road / Sorrento Parkway

9. Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Cir (East)/Courtyard Loop

10. Ferrari Ranch Road / SR 65 SB Ramps

11. Ferrari Ranch Road / SR 65 NB Ramps

12. Ferrari Ranch Road / Groveland Ln

13. Ferrari Ranch Road / Joiner Parkway

14. Nelson Lane / SR 65 (existing only)
1 Cumulative Plus Project Conditions were included to understand the future roadway conditions with the implementation of the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment and the Village 5 and Village 7 Specific Plan buildouts.

Attachment 6
637
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 6

15. Nelson Lane / SR 65 NB Ramps (cumulative only)

16. Nelson Lane / SR 65 SB Ramps (cumulative only)

17. Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard (cumulative only)

18. Moore Road/ Liberty Parkway (cumulative only)

19. Liberty Parkway / North Roundabout (cumulative only)

20. Liberty Parkway / South Roundabout (cumulative only)

21. Ferrari Ranch Road / Liberty Parkway (cumulative only) Attachment 6
638
Attachment 6
639
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 8
Intersection Operations Analysis
Traffic operations were evaluated using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies implemented within Synchro traffic analysis software. The analysis estimates average vehicle delay and level of service (LOS) at the study intersections. Level of Service was used as the primary measure of operational performance and reflects the quality of traffic flow from the perspective of motorists, including the comfort and convenience associated with driving. The Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022), defines LOS criteria and calculation procedures. LOS is categorized into six levels, ranging from LOS A, which represents free-flow traffic conditions with minimal delay, to LOS F, which represents oversaturated conditions where traffic demand exceeds available capacity, resulting in excessive delays and long vehicle queues. Table 1 presents the relationship between delay and LOS for signalized and unsignalized intersections.

Table 1. Intersection Level of Service Definitions
Level of
Service Description
Average Control Delay1
Signalized
Unsignalized
and
Roundabouts
A
Volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable, or cycle length is very short. Most vehicles arrive during the green phase and travel through the intersection without stopping
≤10.0 ≤10.0
B
Volume-to-capacity ratio is low, progression is highly
favorable, and/or cycle lengths are short. More vehicles stop than LOS A.
>10.0 to

20.0 >10.0 to 15.0
C
Progression is favorable or cycle length is moderate.

Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level.

The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. >20.0 to

35.0 >15.0 to 25.0
D
Volume-to-capacity ratio is higher and either progression is ineffective, or the cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.
>35.0 to

55.0 >25.0 to 35.0
E
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high, progression is
unfavorable, and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent
>55.0 to

80.0 >35.0 to 50.0
F
Volume-to-capacity ratio is very high, progression is very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue
>80.0 >50.0
Notes:

Average control delay presented in seconds per vehicle.

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition. Transportation Research Board, 2022.

Intersection peak hour factor (PHF) was calculated for each individual intersection based on the peak hour for each intersection.

Attachment 6
640
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 9
Travel Demand Forecasting
For purposes of forecasting traffic volumes for the study intersections, the South Placer Regional Transportation Authority (SPRTA) 2023 Model was selected as the basis for project trip distribution and cumulative plus project volumes. The SPRTA model was determined to be the most appropriate tool for this study, as it incorporates the most up-to-date base year and a reasonable horizon year, and more closely reflects anticipated land use growth and roadway network improvements within the City of Lincoln than either of the alternative models reviewed. More information regarding the models reviewed, their land use and transportation assumptions is provided in “Lincoln Village 7B Specific Plan Amendment – Project Travel Characteristics Memorandum” dated November 25, 2025 and included in Appendix B.

The SPRTA 2023 travel demand model was applied to generate study intersection traffic volume forecast inputs for the cumulative plus project analysis scenario described above. Separate model runs were performed for Existing and Cumulative Plus Project Conditions and the model-produced volume forecasts were extracted for final adjustments to account for differences between the model’s base year volume estimates and observed traffic counts. The adjustment involves isolating the incremental change in volume between the base year model and the future year analysis scenario and adding that difference to the baseline traffic counts. This adjustment process helps to minimize potential errors in the model’s base year estimates and is based on the methodology contained in Analytical Travel Forecasting Approaches for Project-Level Planning and Design, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 765 (Transportation Research Board, 2014).

Performance Criteria
The traffic analysis and the proposed improvements presented in this study are developed in the context of policies T-2.3 and T-2.4 of the City of Lincoln General Plan, last updated in March 2008.

Policy T-2.3 establishes the City of Lincoln’s level of service C policy for signalized intersections during the PM peak hour. In the absence of a City policy addressing LOS for unsignalized intersections or other time periods (such as the AM peak hour), this study applies the LOS C standard to all City of Lincoln intersections for both the AM and PM peak hours, consistent with prior City of Lincoln traffic studies.

The City of Lincoln General Plan Policy T-2.4 also states that the City shall coordinate with Caltrans to strive to maintain a minimum of LOS D conditions for SR 65. This policy is applied to Caltrans’ ramp intersections where they intersect City of Lincoln roadways.

Attachment 6
641
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 10
III. Existing Conditions
The Village 7 Specific Plan project site is located in the southwest area of the City of Lincoln, and is served by a network of arterial roadways providing both local and regional connectivity. Key roadways in the area include:
• State Route 65 (SR 65), a freeway south of Ferrari Ranch Road and an expressway north of Ferrari Ranch Road, functions as the primary regional travel corridor for traffic accessing the site,
• Ferrari Ranch Road is the principal east-west arterial connection between the project site and the regional freeway system. West of its interchange with SR 65, it is median-divided with two lanes in each direction with a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour (mph). Ferrari Ranch Road currently terminates at Caledon Circle West. • Site access is provided via a westward extension of Ferrari Ranch Road through Village 7 Specific Plan, connecting to Moore Road on the west.
• Extending westerly from the edge of Village 7, Moore Road is currently a two-lane rural roadway that connects to Nelson Lane (which features a signalized intersection to the north at SR 65) and Fiddyment Road to the south.

Data Collection
The traffic counts were collected on a weekday (while schools are in session) during the AM peak period (7-9 AM) and afternoon peak period (3-6 PM) on Thursday, May 29, 2025 at the following 14 study intersections. The counts included vehicles, bicyclists, pedestrians, and trucks. Peak hour vehicle volumes derived from the intersection turning movement counts are illustrated in Figure 5.

1. Nelson Lane / SR 65

2. Moore Road / Fiddyment Road

3. Moore Road / Nelson Lane

4. Moore Road / Sorrento Parkway

5. Sorrento Parkway / Marina Grande Way/Torino Way

6. Sorrento Parkway / Portello Way/Lucca Ln

7. Sorrento Parkway / Benvenito Ln

8. Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Cir (West)

9. Ferrari Ranch Road / Sorrento Parkway

10. Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Cir (East)/Courtyard Loop

11. Ferrari Ranch Road / SR 65 SB Ramps

12. Ferrari Ranch Road / SR 65 NB Ramps

13. Ferrari Ranch Road / Groveland Ln

14. Ferrari Ranch Road / Joiner Parkway
A 48-hour hose count was collected on Wednesday, May 28, 2025 through Thursday, May 29, 2026 at the following locations to understand daily traffic flows and are presented in Table 2:

1. Nelson Lane: north of Moore Road

2. Moore Road: east of Nelson Lane

3. Sorrento Parkway: east/south of Moore Road

4. Sorrento Parkway: north of Ferrari Ranch Road
Attachment 6
642
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 11
Table 2: Existing Average Daily Volumes
Roadway Segment NB/EB Average
Daily Volume
SB/WB Average
Daily Volume
Total Daily
Volume
Nelson Lane: north of Moore Road 1,320 1,380 2,700
Moore Road: east of Nelson Lane 790 660 1,450
Sorrento Parkway: east/south of Moore Road 930 740 1,670 Sorrento Parkway: north of Ferrari Ranch
Road 2,890 3,060 5,950
Note: Volumes shown represent the average of traffic counts on Wednesday, May 28 and Thursday, May 29, 2025.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2026.

Counts collected for this project are shown in Appendix C.

Signal timing sheets were provided by City of Lincoln and Caltrans staff in August 2025. These signal timing sheets were used in the Existing Conditions analysis and optimized under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions.

Field Observations
Peak period field observations were conducted by Fehr & Peers staff at the time of the traffic counts.

Conditions at the study intersections were typical during both AM and PM peak periods, with no significant operational issues observed with one exception:
• At the intersection of Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Circle (East) / Courtyard Loop, student dropoff/pick-up traffic to Scott Leaman Elementary School was observed during the AM peak hour Queues were recorded in the westbound left-turn and northbound right-turn movements, with the northbound approach experiencing the longer queue. See Figure 5. • There were approximately 20 pedestrians crossing the south leg (northbound approach) and approximately 10 crossing the west leg (eastbound approach) during the AM peak hour.

Figure 4 School-related traffic queuing observed on Caledon Circle (East) at Ferrari Ranch Road during the AM peak period
Attachment 6
643
5 Attachment 6
644
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 13
Existing Analysis Results
Table 3 presents the existing AM and PM peak hour LOS for each study intersection. Refer to Appendix D for technical calculations.

During the AM and PM peak hours, all intersections operate at an acceptable level of service.

Intersections along Sorrento Parkway operate at LOS A or B with minimal delay.

Table 3. Peak Hour Intersection Operations-Existing Conditions No. Intersection LOS
Threshold
Traffic
Control1
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3
1 Fiddyment Rd & Moore Rd C AWSC 7.7 A 8.5 A
2 Moore Rd & Nelson Ln C SSSC 5.3
(9.1) A (A) 5.5 (9.6) A (A)
3 Caledon Circle (East)/ Courtyard Loop
& Ferrari Ranch Rd C Signal 8.7 A 8.8 A
4 Moore Rd & Sorrento Pkwy C AWSC 7.7 A 7.6 A
5 Marina Grande Way/Torino Way &
Sorrento Pkwy C SSSC 2.2 (9.9) A (A) 1.2 (9.8) A (A)
6 Sorrento Pkwy & Lucca Ln/Portello Way C AWSC 9.5 A 8.5 A 7 Sorrento Pkwy & Benvenito Ln C SSSC 1.5
(14.8) A (B) 0.7 (12.1) A (B)
8 Ferrari Ranch Rd & Sorrento Pkwy C AWSC 11.0 B 8.6 A
9 Caledon Circle (East)/Courtyard Loop
& Ferrari Ranch Rd C Signal 28.0 C 19.4 B
10 SR65 SB Ramps & Ferrari Ranch Rd D Signal 5.9 A 5.6 A 11 SR65 NB Ramps & Ferrari Ranch Rd D Signal 10.5 A 11.7 B 12 Ferrari Ranch Rd & Groveland Ln C Signal 22.9 C 25.0 C 13 Ferrari Ranch Rd & Joiner Pkwy C Signal 24.6 C 24.6 C 14 Nelson Ln & SR 65 D Signal 27.2 C 25.8 C
Bold text indicates unacceptable level of service conditions.

1. AWSC: All Way Stop Controlled intersection. SSSC: Side-Street Stop Controlled intersection

2. Average control delay (in seconds) for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections is the weighted average for all movements. For side-street stop-controlled intersections, the reported delay is the average control delay for all movements followed by the average control delay for the worst approach in parentheses.

3. LOS = level of service calculated per the thresholds presented in Table 1. For side-street stop-controlled intersection, the LOS for the intersection is provided followed by the LOS for the worst approach in parentheses.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2026.

Attachment 6
645
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 14
IV. Project Travel Characteristics
Travel characteristics for the proposed Amendment were documented in the “Lincoln Village 7B Specific Plan Amendment – Project Travel Characteristics Memorandum” dated November 25, 2025.

This memorandum is shown in Appendix B. Below is a brief summary of the project travel characteristics.

Trip Generation
The Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment would generate 4,041 more daily, 261 more AM peak hour, and 338 more PM peak hour trips compared to land uses assumed for the site under the Current Village 7 Specific Plan.

Table 4. Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment - Changes in External Vehicle Trips Scenario Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment 32,384 893 1,788 2,680 1,916 1,235 3,151 Current Village 7 Specific Plan 28,343 815 1,604 2,419 1,714 1,099 2,813 Difference 4,041 78 184 261 202 136 338
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2026.

Trip Distribution
Project trip distribution was developed using the SPRTA 2023 Model in accordance with the travel demand model evaluation described under the Analysis Methodology section. The external Cumulative Plus Project trip distribution is shown in Appendix B.

Attachment 6
646
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 15
V. Cumulative Plus Project Conditions
The Cumulative Plus Project analysis scenario evaluates AM and PM peak hour study intersection operations based on anticipated future traffic volumes, utilizing the model outlined in the Travel Demand Forecasting section. The Cumulative Plus Project analysis scenario includes the proposed Amendment, as well as the various other reasonably foreseeable projects, such as development of the remainder of the Village 7 Specific Plan and the Village 5 Specific Plan.

Cumulative Plus Project Roadway Geometry
The Cumulative Plus Project analysis assumes the same roadway system and intersection controls as are currently present with updates to 12 of the 21 intersections. Below lists the assumed roadway geometry modifications based on approved projects, such as Village 5 Specific Plan. • Intersection 1: Moore Road / Fiddyment Road
o The Nelson Lane intersection at Moore Road (Int #2) is realigned to Fiddyment Road (Int #1).
o The northbound and southbound approaches have a left-turn lane, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane.
o The eastbound and westbound approaches have a left-turn lane, two through lanes, and a right-turn lane
• Intersection 2: Moore Road / Nelson Lane
o With the realignment of Nelson Lane to Fiddyment Road (Int #1), this is no longer a study intersection.
• Intersection 3: Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Circle West o Modified to operate as a signalized intersection
• Intersection 8: Ferrari Ranch Road / Sorrento Parkway o Modified to operate as a signalized intersection
• Intersection 14: Nelson Lane / SR 65
o This intersection is assumed to become a partial cloverleaf grade-separated interchange broken up into two intersections:
 Int #15 Nelson Lane / SR 65 NB Ramps
 Int #16 Nelson Lane / SR 65 SB Ramps
• Intersection 15: Nelson Lane / SR 65 NB Ramps
o A new signalized intersection
o The northbound and southbound approaches have three through lanes and one right-turn lane
o The westbound approach has a left-turn lane, a shared lane, and a right-turn lane • Intersection 16: Nelson Lane / SR 65 SB Ramps
o A new signalized intersection
o The northbound and southbound approaches have three through lanes and one right-turn lane
o The eastbound approach has a left-turn lane and a shared through/right-turn lane • Intersection 17: Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard o For purposes of the Cumulative Plus Project evaluation, this intersection was assumed to be an all-way stop-controlled intersection. More details regarding the Attachment 6
647
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 16
preferred intersection control may be found in the “Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard Evaluation” section
o The eastbound and westbound approaches have one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane
o The northbound and southbound approaches have one left-turn lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane
• Intersection 18: Moore Road / Liberty Parkway
o A new all-way stop-controlled intersection
o All approaches have a single, shared lane
• Intersection 19: Liberty Parkway / North Roundabout
o A new single-lane roundabout intersection
• Intersection 20: Liberty Parkway / South Roundabout
o A new single-lane roundabout intersection
• Intersection 21: Ferrari Ranch Road / Liberty Parkway o A new signalized intersection
o The eastbound and westbound approaches have one left-turn lane, two through lanes, and one right-turn lane
o The northbound approach has one left-turn lane, one through lane, and one rightturn lane o The southbound approach has one left-turn lane, and one shared through/rightturn lane Figure 6 illustrates peak hour intersection turning movement volumes under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions.

Attachment 6
648
Attachment 6
649
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 18
Cumulative Plus Project Analysis Results
Table 5 presents the AM and PM peak hour delay and LOS for each study intersection under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions. Refer to Appendix E for technical calculations.

During the AM peak hour, all intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels of service except at the following intersections:
• Intersection 3: Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Circle (West) serves school traffic in the morning where the side-street experiences around 30 seconds of delay resulting in LOS D. • Intersection 9: Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Circle (East) – Courtyard Loop serves school traffic in the morning, including a substantial number of multimodal users. Through traffic on Ferrari Ranch Road is expected to increase substantially (i.e., eastbound through movement increases from 520 to 1,400 vehicles between Existing and Cumulative Plus Project Conditions).

During the PM peak hour, all intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable levels of service except the following:
• Intersection 3: Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Circle (West) has a side-street stop delay of approximately 36 seconds resulting in LOS E.
• Intersection 12: Ferrari Ranch Road / Groveland Lane is situated immediately east of the SR 65 / Ferrari Ranch Road interchange and functions as a key access point for traffic traveling to and from areas east of the interchange. The intersection is further affected by concentrated PM peak period traffic associated with adjacent retail uses on the minor street approaches, which results in unacceptable LOS conditions.
• Intersection 17: Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard is assumed to be an all-way stop-controlled intersection per the approved Village 7 Specific Plan, but was identified to operate unacceptably. Additional analysis is provided in the next section regarding the preferred control at this intersection.

Attachment 6
650
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 19
Table 5. Peak Hour Intersection Operations-Cumulative Plus Project Conditions No. Intersection LOS
Threshold
Traffic
Control1
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3
1 Moore Rd / Fiddyment Rd / Nelson Ln C Signal 15.0 B 28.1 C 3 Ferrari Ranch Rd / Caledon Cir (West) C Signal 9.3 A 8.4 A 4 Sorrento Pkwy / Moore Rd C AWSC 9.5 A 11.2 B
5 Sorrento Pkwy / Marina Grande WyTorino Wy C SSSC 1.7 (12.6) A (B) 1.0 (14.0) A (B)
6 Sorrento Pkwy / Portello Wy – Lucca Ln C AWSC 12.9 B 12.5 B 7 Sorrento Pkwy / Benvenito Ln C SSSC 1.6
(21.8) A (C) 0.8 (17.2) A (C)
8 Ferrari Ranch Rd / Sorrento Pkwy C Signal 10.1 B 8.8 A 9 Ferrari Ranch Rd / Caledon Cir (East) –
Courtyard Loop C Signal 49.3 D 28.1 C
10 Ferrari Ranch Rd / SR 65 SB Ramps D Signal 26.6 C 12.8 B 11 Ferrari Ranch Rd / SR 65 NB Ramps D Signal 15.3 B 26.3 C 12 Ferrari Ranch Rd / Groveland Ln C Signal 30.4 C 46.9 D 13 Ferrari Ranch Rd / Joiner Pkwy C Signal 28.1 C 29.4 C 15 Nelson Ln / SR 65 NB Ramps D Signal 11.3 B 18.5 B
16 Nelson Ln / SR 65 SB Ramps D Signal 11.0 B 53.1 D
17 Moore Rd / Ferrari Ranch Rd / Shallus
Blvd C AWSC 18.9 C 26.9 D
18 Moore Rd / Liberty Pkwy C AWSC 9.3 A 9.9 A
19 Liberty Pkwy / North Roundabout C Rdbt 4.6 A 4.2 A
20 Liberty Pkwy / South Roundabout C Rdbt 7.4 A 5.4 A
21 Ferrari Ranch Rd / Liberty Pkwy C Signal 25.8 C 29.9 C Notes:

Bold text indicates unacceptable level of service conditions.

1. AWSC: All Way Stop Controlled intersection. SSSC: Side-Street Stop Controlled intersection. Rdbt:

Roundabout intersection

2. Average control delay (in seconds) for signalized, all-way stop controlled, and roundabout intersections is the weighted average for all movements. For side-street stop-controlled intersections, the reported delay is the average control delay for all movements followed by the average control delay for the worst approach in parentheses.

3. LOS = level of service calculated per the thresholds presented in Table 1. For side-street stop-controlled intersection, the LOS for the intersection is provided followed by the LOS for the worst approach in parentheses.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2026.

Average Daily Traffic
Table 6 presents the estimated Cumulative and Cumulative with Project Conditions ADT for the four roadway segments that were counted in May 2025.

Attachment 6
651
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 20
Table 6: Cumulative Plus Project Average Daily Traffic Volumes Roadway Segment
Daily Volume
Existing
Cumulative with
Current Village 7
Specific Plan
Cumulative with
Proposed Village
7 Specific Plan
Amendment
Nelson Lane: north of Moore Road 2,700 18,990 19,640
Moore Road: east of Nelson Lane 1,450 12,550 13,920
Sorrento Parkway: east/south of
Moore Road 1,670 4,130 5,560
Sorrento Parkway: north of Ferrari
Ranch Road 5,950 8,310 9,740
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2026.

Sorrento Parkway Operations
Additional attention was given to operations along Sorrento Parkway due to its proximity to the Village 7B area and adjacent existing neighborhoods. The Synchro operational models were converted to SimTraffic for the purpose of visualizing vehicle queues along Sorrento Parkway with and without the proposed Amendment. A simulation run was conducted to capture queue visualizations. SimTraffic accounts for the effects of turn-pocket overflows/blockages, vehicle queuing interactions between adjacent intersections, and coordinated signal operations. The software captures driver behavior characteristics and models interactions between vehicles within the study network. Compared to conventional deterministic analysis methods, such as those outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and applied in Synchro 12, SimTraffic more effectively represents the impacts of turn-pocket queue overflows, imbalanced lane usage, queue blocking, queue interactions between adjacent intersections, and pedestrian crossing activity.

The figures below present screenshots of the SimTraffic model displaying vehicle queues along Sorrento Parkway during the AM peak hour. This analysis focuses on the AM peak hour because Sorrento Parkway carries school traffic during the AM peak hour. Additionally, during the PM peak hour, traffic along Sorrento Parkway disperses into surrounding neighborhoods rather than converging at the Ferrari Ranch Road intersection.

Figure 7 below shows the observed queuing under Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Conditions at Sorrento Parkway / Ferrari Ranch Road during the AM peak hour. The southbound leftturn 95th percentile queues increased by approximately seven vehicles with the Amendment, but Sorrento Parkway was able to be cleared with each cycle of the signal under both conditions.

The side-street stop-controlled Sorrento Parkway/Benvenito Lane intersection is situated just 150 feet north of Ferrari Ranch Road. It permits all turning movements and has a “gullwing” type design to enable the westbound left-turning traffic to wait in the median to merge onto southbound Ferrari Ranch Road. There are two southbound left-turn lanes, though each has only about 150 feet of storage. Currently, 381 vehicles turn left from Sorrento Parkway onto eastbound Ferrari Ranch Road during the AM peak hour. This volume is projected to increase to 520 vehicles under Cumulative Conditions and 590 vehicles under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions.

Attachment 6
652
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 21
Benvenito Lane is the sole vehicular access to 58 single-family dwelling units. Delays exiting that community onto Sorrento Parkway are likely to increase with the addition of Amendment trips as the southbound inside left-turn pocket is more frequently full. Options to restrict the outbound left-turn lane were considered but dismissed due to operational concerns. If that movement was restricted, motorists would be forced to turn right. Many would likely perform a u-turn on Sorrento Parkway just beyond the end of the raised median situated 300 feet to the north. Due to the roadway width, uturns would require encroachment into the on-street bike lanes.

Figure 7: AM Peak Hour Queuing on Sorrento Parkway at Ferrari Ranch Road without and with Amendment Figure 8 below shows the observed queuing under Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Conditions at Sorrento Parkway / Lucca Lane-Portello Way during the AM peak hour. 95th percentile queuing at Sorrento Parkway/Portello Way-Lucca Lane was not more than three vehicles at each approach under both conditions. Overall, queuing didn’t differ much at other locations along Sorrento Parkway.

Figure 8: AM Peak Hour Queuing on Sorrento Parkway at Portello Way-Lucca Road without and with Amendment Attachment 6
653
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 22
Intersection Improvements
This section discusses recommended improvements to enhance operations at intersections that are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions.

However, first an in-depth review of the Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard intersection is presented to support the identification of a preferred intersection traffic control.

Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard Evaluation The intersection of Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard is located on the western edge of the Village 7 Specific Plan area. The southern leg of the intersection provides residential access to homes on the south side of Ferrari Ranch Road, and the northern leg of the intersection (Moore Road) is a collector street with no vehicular access into the Village 7 Specific Plan area until Moore Road turns to an east-west roadway approximately 2,000 feet to the north.

The planned configuration is an all-way stop-control as identified in the approved Village 7 Specific Plan. However, further evaluation was conducted under the Cumulative Plus Project scenario to ensure that an all-way stop provides adequate operations and access to the surrounding future land uses.

Three intersection configurations were evaluated for safety and operations: all-way stop, signal, and roundabout.

Safety
Safety considerations were evaluated based on the number of predicted crashes, considering both frequency and severity. Because the intersection was constructed within the past few years, no historical crash data are currently available, and the intersection has not yet been constructed to its future number of lanes.

The Safety Performance for Intersection Control Evaluation (SPICE) tool developed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) was used to assess estimated annual crashes under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions. The SPICE tool performs predictive safety analysis of at-grade intersection control configurations using estimated Cumulative Plus Project Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) forecasts, facility type, and number of legs/lanes.

The detailed inputs and results from SPICE are presented in Appendix F. SPICE tool was used to evaluate the following three traffic control strategies:
• All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection
• Signalized Intersection
• Roundabout Intersection (1 north-south approach lane, 2 east-west approach lanes) Table 7 lists the anticipated number of crashes and total number of predicted crashes for the proposed traffic control strategies. Based on the crash prediction summary calculated for the Cumulative Plus Project year only, the Signalized Intersection and Roundabout Intersection perform similarly in terms of total expected number of crashes with 1.57 and 1.43 per year, respectively.

However, the Roundabout Intersection is predicted to have approximately 57% fewer fatal and injury crashes compared to the Signalized Intersection.

Attachment 6
654
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 23
Table 7. Traffic Control Strategy Predicted Crashes for Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard
Traffic Control Strategy Crash Type
Predicted Crashes Annually
During Cumulative Plus
Project
All-Way Stop-Controlled Intersection Total No SPF1
Fatal & Injury No SPF1
Signalized Intersection
Total 1.57
Fatal & Injury 0.53
Roundabout Intersection2 Total 1.43
Fatal & Injury 0.23
Notes:

1. The Cumulative Plus Project AADT was not within range of the data used to develop the safety performance functions (SPFs) for each control strategy; therefore, no predicted crash information is available. A SPF is a statistical equation used to predict the average crash frequency per year for a specific type of roadway, intersection, or traffic facility.

2. The roundabout intersection as assumed to have two east-west approach lanes and one north-south approach lane.

Source: FHWA SPICE Tool (2023); Fehr & Peers, 2026.

Traffic Operations
The operational assessment was conducted using Synchro for the all-way stop and signalized intersection controls as outlined under the Analysis Methodology section, and SIDRA for the roundabout intersection control. Table 8 shows the intersection operations under the three intersection controls. The detailed analysis sheets are included in Appendix F.

During the AM peak hour, all intersection control options are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better. During the PM peak hour, the roundabout and signal are expected to operate at LOS B and A, respectively and the all-way stop-controlled intersection does not meet the City of Lincoln LOS C criterion.

Table 8: Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Control Results
Intersection Control
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay1 LOS2 Delay1 LOS2
All-Way Stop-Control 18.9 C 26.9 D
Signal with Protected Left-turns 13.7 B 15.6 B
Roundabout3 5.7 A 7.5 A
Notes:

1. Average control delay (in seconds) for signalized, all-way stop controlled, and roundabout intersections is the weighted average for all movements.

2. LOS = level of service calculated per the thresholds presented in Table 1.

3. The roundabout intersection as assumed to have two east-west approach lanes and one north-south approach lane.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2026.

Attachment 6
655
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 24

TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS
As part of the signalized intersection evaluation, a preliminary signal warrant was completed. The California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) (Caltrans, 2026) Signal Warrant Analysis was conducted to determine whether the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection is justified based on the projected traffic volumes and operational conditions. The MUTCD provides criteria to evaluate the recommendation for traffic signals, including volume thresholds, crash history, and other contextual considerations as discussed below. • Warrants 1, 2, and 3 (Eight-Hour, Four-Hour, and Peak Hour Vehicular Volume) require certain peak traffic volume demands to be met on both the major and minor street approaches. The analysis conducted as a part of this study only included the Peak Hour Vehicular Volume warrant given the traffic data collected and available for this study. Both AM and PM peak hour signal warrants (for urban areas) were met as shown in Appendix F. • Warrants 4 and 5 (Pedestrian Volume and School Crossing) are not met at this time. Pedestrian activity is generally assumed to be minimal along and across Ferrari Ranch Road. The only potential exception is pedestrian traffic related to the planned elementary school on the northeast corner of the intersection. Access to and from this elementary school has not yet been identified.

However, based on other elementary schools in the City of Lincoln, it is not common for vehicle or pedestrian access to be provided along the major roadway. Therefore, pedestrian demand is assumed to be minimal at this time and should be further evaluated once the design of the elementary school has been identified.
• Warrant 6 (Coordinated Signal System) does not apply, as the nearby traffic signals are more than 1,000 feet away.
• Warrant 7 (Crash Experience) requires documented crash patterns correctable by a traffic signal.

Because the intersection was constructed within the past few years, no historical crash data are currently available.
• Warrant 8 (Roadway Network) is not met because Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard do not serve as intersecting principal arterials. • Warrant 9 (Intersection Near a Grade Crossing) is not applicable, as there are no rail crossings near the intersection.

Based on the Cumulative Plus Project volumes, Warrant 1 described above would be met. However, it is worth noting that the warrant is not overwhelmingly met and is dependent on substantial amounts of development to occur in Village 5 and Placer One Specific Plans. This implies that the traffic volumes at this intersection won’t meet the signal warrant volumes criteria for many years.

This report does not presently recommend one form of traffic control over another at this intersection due to following three areas of uncertainty:

1. Lack of knowledge of nearby elementary school site planning. An elementary school would be situated directly north of Ferrari Ranch Road between Moore Road and Liberty Parkway.

The types of vehicular and pedestrian accesses, which are not known at this time, could directly influence the preferred type of traffic control at this intersection.

2. Lack of certainty of planned nearby bicycle and pedestrian facilities. It is unknown where and what types of facilities will be provided near the intersection. This can dictate not only crosswalk placement but also the preferred type of traffic control.

3. Unknown street right-of-way. Roundabouts typically require more space than signals. A multi-lane roundabout can have an inscribed diameter of 140 feet or more. The site plan indicates linear parkways on some legs of the intersection. It is not known whether the recently reconfigured property in the northwest corner of the intersection can be encroached upon or if it belongs to a private, non-participating specific plan property.

Attachment 6
656
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 25
Cumulative Plus Project Intersection Deficiencies
The following improvements are recommended to address adverse level of service conditions shown in Table 5, aside from Intersection 17: Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard which is explained in detail in the section above.

Intersection 9: Ferrari Ranch Rd / Caledon Cir (East) – Courtyard Loop • Northbound:
o One left-turn lane, one shared through/right-turn lane, and one right-turn lane o No right-turn on red when pedestrians are in the north leg crosswalk o Protected left-turn phasing
o Pedestrian crosswalk across the northbound leg
o Bike lanes on departing and receiving lanes
• Southbound:
o One left-turn lane, and one shared through/right-turn lane o Protected left-turn phasing
o Pedestrian crosswalk across the southbound leg
o Bike lanes on departing and receiving lanes
Intersection 12: Ferrari Ranch Rd / Groveland Ln
• Eastbound:
o One shared left-turn/through lane, and one right-turn lane o Permissive and overlap for eastbound right
o Pedestrian crosswalk across the eastbound leg
o Bike lanes on departing and receiving lanes
Table 9 shows how the above improvements would benefit AM and PM peak hour delays and LOS and the two intersections. See Appendix G for technical calculations.

Table 9. Peak Hour Intersection Operations-Cumulative Plus Project Conditions with Improvements
Intersection Traffic
Control1
Cumulative Plus Project
Conditions
Cumulative Plus Project
Conditions with Improvements
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3 Delay2 LOS3
9 Ferrari Ranch Rd /
Caledon Cir (East) –
Courtyard Loop
Signal 49.3 D 28.1 C 41.3 D 26.4 C
12 Ferrari Ranch Rd /
Groveland Ln Signal 30.4 C 46.9 D 27.1 C 31.8 C
Notes:

1. AWSC: All Way Stop Controlled intersection. SSSC: Side-Street Stop Controlled intersection. Rdbt:

Roundabout intersection

2. Average control delay (in seconds) for signalized and all-way stop controlled intersections is the weighted average for all movements. For roundabout and side-street stop-controlled intersections, the reported delay is the average control delay for movements that yield the right-of-way.

3. LOS = level of service calculated per the thresholds presented in Table 1.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2026.

Attachment 6
657
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 26
The proposed improvements at Intersection 9 identified above were able to decrease delay at the intersection back to conditions that are expected under the current Village 7 Specific Plan. Aside from adding a third eastbound through lane to Intersection 9, improvements at the intersection were not able to return to an acceptable level. The incremental delay attributable to the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment was estimated by comparing the Existing Plus Original Village 7 Specific Plan scenario with the Existing Plus Proposed Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment scenario, as documented in the “Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment – Consistency Review” dated February 13, 2026. This memorandum is included in Appendix A.

Improvements at Intersection 12 can return the level of service back to acceptable levels.

VI. Conclusion
This LTA evaluated the roadway effects of the proposed Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment on the surrounding roadway network, with a focus on peak hour intersection vehicle delay and LOS. The analysis was conducted using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies and assessed against the City of Lincoln General Plan LOS policies.

Under Existing Conditions, all study intersections operate at acceptable levels of service during both the AM and PM peak hours. Field observations generally confirmed acceptable operations, with localized queuing observed at the Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Circle (East) / Courtyard Loop intersection attributable to school-related activity.

Under Cumulative Plus Project Conditions, which reflect long-term buildout including the proposed Amendment and other approved developments, the majority of study intersections are anticipated to operate at acceptable LOS during both peak hours. However, operational deficiencies were identified at the following locations.
• During the AM peak hour, the Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Circle (East) – Courtyard Loop intersection is projected to operate at unacceptable LOS due to a combination of school-related traffic, multimodal activity, and growth in through traffic. • During the PM peak hour, unacceptable LOS conditions are projected at the Ferrari Ranch Road / Groveland Lane intersection and the Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard intersection.

Targeted intersection improvements were developed to address these deficiencies. For the Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Circle (East) intersection, the recommended improvements include modifying the northbound approach to include one left-turn lane, one shared through/right-turn lane, and one right-turn lane with no right-turn on red implemented when there is a pedestrian crossing the north leg. This intersection could also include modifying the southbound approach to include a left-turn lane and shared through/right-turn lane and protected north-south left-turn phasing. For the Ferrari Ranch Road / Groveland Lane intersection, the recommended improvements include modifying the eastbound approach to one shared left-turn/through lane and one right-turn lane with permissive and overlap for the eastbound right.

With the implementation of the recommended improvements, acceptable LOS conditions are achieved at the Ferrari Ranch Road / Groveland Lane intersection and the Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Road / Shallus Boulevard intersection during both peak hours. For the Moore Road / Ferrari Ranch Attachment 6
658
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 27
Road / Shallus Boulevard intersection, additional evaluation of alternative intersection control strategies demonstrated that a roundabout would provide preferable operational performance and safety benefits relative to signalized or all-way stop control and is therefore identified as the preferred long-term control.

At the Ferrari Ranch Road / Caledon Circle (East) – Courtyard Loop intersection, the proposed operational and geometric improvements reduce delay and improve operations; however, acceptable LOS cannot be achieved without the addition of a third eastbound through lane and associated receiving lane (or other similarly effective improvements). Despite this remaining deficiency, the proposed improvements reduce intersection delay to levels that are generally consistent with or improved compared to those anticipated under the currently approved Village 7 Specific Plan.

Based on the results of this analysis, the added traffic resulting from the proposed Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment can be adequately accommodated within the planned roadway network, provided the recommended improvements are implemented. The proposed Amendment is therefore consistent with the City of Lincoln General Plan transportation policies and does not introduce the need for substantially different roadway improvements relative to the approved Village 7 Specific Plan.

Attachment 6
659
P
Appendix A. Village 7
Specific Plan Amendment –
Consistency Review
Memorandum
Attachment 6
660
Technical Memorandum
Date: February 13 , 2026
To: Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
From: John Gard and Ashley Weiss, Fehr & Peers
Subject: Lincoln Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment - Consistency Review Overview
An amendment to the Village 7 Specific Plan (henceforth referred to as “Village 7 B Amendment”) has been proposed by the project applicant. This memorandum presents a detailed qualitative analysis t o understand whether the proposed land use changes associated with the amendment would cause new or more severe transportation impacts (relative to those identified in the Village 7 Specific Plan Project EIR, PBS&J, 2009 ). In light of the fact that conditions have changed dramatically since that EIR was prepared, this consistency review also focuses on whether proposed land use changes would cause new or more severe impacts under current (2025) conditions.

The Village 7 Specific Plan was originally approved in 20 10 by the City of Lincoln and last updated in 2024 . The Village 7 Specific Plan is located in the southwest area of the City of Lincoln, along both sides of Ferrari Ranch Road. The Village 7 B Amendment includes modified land uses for the most northern portion of the Village 7 Specific Plan area north of Moore Road. This area is known as the Scheiber and Aitken Ranch II properties and also referred to as the “Village 7B area”. The Village 7B area is currently vacant and will connect to the remaining portions of the Village 7 Specific Plan area via Liberty Par kway and Moore Road.

The Village 7 B Amendment is sub ject to requirements enacted by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This memorandum consists of the following sections that enable evaluation of the project’s transportation impacts under CEQA :
• Project Description
• Trip Generation Comparison
• Changed Conditions
• Standards of Significance
• Impacts Assessment
Project Description
The original Village 7 Specific Plan included the following land uses 1:
1 Source: Village 7 Specific Plan Project DEIR , June 2009 .

Attachment 6
661
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 2
• 7 units of Country Estates
• 1,113 units of Low Density Residential
• 1,393 units of Medium Density Residential
• 772 units of High Density Residential
• Elementary School (assumed in Village 7 DEIR to have 900 - student capacity) • 4.9 acre Mixed Use Commercial (Assumed in DEIR as 15,000 sq. ft. Community Center) • 58 acres of Parks and Recreation
The original Village 7 Specific Plan was last updated in 2024 to reflect minor adjustments to the proposed land uses (hereinto referred to as the “ c urrent Village 7 Specific Plan”). The c urrent Village 7 Specific Plan includes the following land uses: 2
• 1,181 units of Low Density Residential
• 1,529 units of Medium Density Residential
• 575 units of High Density Residential
• Elementary School (assumed in Village 7 DEIR to have 900 - student capacity) • 4.9 acre Mixed Use Commercial (Assumed in DEIR as 15,000 sq. ft. Community Center) • 58 acres of Parks and Recreation
The Village 7 B Amendment would reduce the amount of Parks and Recreation space by 2.7 acres, while also modifying the density of several parcels zoned for residential uses. It would result in the following net changes in land uses compared to the current Village 7 Specific Plan :
• Reduce amount of Low Density Residential by 181 units. • Increase amount of Medium - High Density Residential by 740 units. • Increase amount of Medium Density Residential by 69 units. • Increase amount of Country Estates Residential by 7 units. • Add a 20,000 square feet Community Center.

The net effect of the above is an increase of 635 units compared to the original Village 7 Specific Plan . All of these proposed changes occur on the Scheiber and Aitken Ranch II properties north of Moore Road.

In addition, the proposed project includes minor land use modifications to a 49.5 - acre portion of the Village 7 Specific Plan area south of Moore Road. These proposed minor modifications would modify VMDR from 9.6 acres to 9.4 acres, VLDR from 11.1 acres t o 11.6 acres, VHDR from 3.0 acres to 2.8 acres, and VPR from 8.6 acres to 6.6 acres . These proposed land use modifications would result in a reduction in the total number of units within this area; and, therefore, would not affect this environmental analysis. As a result, the proposed land use modification south of Moore Road are not dis cussed further in this analysis.

Trip Generation Comparison
Table 1 displays the gross trip generation of the approved Village 7 Specific Plan from Table 4.3 - 5 of the Village 7 Specific Plan Project DEIR (2009). The 2009 DEIR used trip generation rates from the 2 Source: Village 7 General Development Plan (Amendment 1), May 14, 2024.

Attachment 6
662
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 3
Institute of Transportation Engineers 2003 Trip Generation Manual (7 th Edition) , which were the most up- to- date at the time.

Table 1. Original Village 7 Specific Plan Trip Generation (7 th Edition Trip Generation)
Trip Rates Trips
Land Use Quantity1 Daily AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour Daily AM Peak Hour
PM Peak
Hour
Single - Family
Residential 2,513 du 9.57 0.75 1.01 24,049 1,885 2,538
Multi- family
Residential 772 du 6.72 0.51 0.62 5,188 394 479
Elementary
School
900
students 1.29 0.42 0.15 1,161 378 135
Community
Center 15 ksf 22.88 1.62 1.64 343 24 25
Gross Trips 30,741 2,681 3,177
Internal Trips 2- 3,240 - 478 - 341
External Trips 27,501 2,203 2,836
Notes:

1. du = dwelling units; ksf = thousand square feet.

2. 50 percent of recreation center trips, 60 percent of school trips assumed to remain internal to the site for daily, AM, and PM peak hours. Additionally, in the daily and PM peak hours, an additional 5 percent total residential - toresidential trips were assumed to remain internal to the site.

Source: Table 4.3 - 5 of the Village 7 Specific Plan Project DEIR (2009).

The Village 7 Specific Plan was updated in 2016 and again in 2024 to include some modifications to the approved land use . No transportation study was conducted for the 2024 update ( referred to here as “c urrent Village 7 Specific Plan”) as the changes to the transportation network and land uses were considered to be minor. Table 2 below includes the trip generation for the current Village 7 Specific Plan using the rates from the original Village 7 DEIR . The current Village 7 Specific Plan is expected to produce an additional 562 daily trips, 47 AM peak hour trips, and 77 PM peak hour trips compared to the original Village 7 Specific Plan.

Table 2. Current Village 7 Specific Plan Trip Generation (7th Edition Trip Generation) Trip Rates Trips
Land Use Quantity1 Daily AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour Daily AM Peak Hour
PM Peak
Hour
Single - Family
Residential 2,710 du 9.57 0.75 1.01 25,935 2,033 2,737
Multi- family
Residential 575 du 6.72 0.51 0.62 3,864 293 357
Elementary
School
900
students 1.29 0.42 0.15 1,161 378 135
Community
Center 15 ksf 22.88 1.62 1.64 343 24 25
Gross Trips 31,303 2,728 3,254
Internal Trips 2- 3,240 - 478 - 341
Attachment 6
663
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 4
Trip Rates Trips
Land Use Quantity1 Daily AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour Daily AM Peak Hour
PM Peak
Hour
External Trips 28,063 2,250 2,913
Notes:

1. du = dwelling units; ksf = thousand square feet.

2. 50 percent of recreation center trips, 60 percent of school trips assumed to remain internal to the site for daily, AM, and PM peak hours. Additionally, in the daily and PM peak hours, an additional 5 percent total residential - toresidential trips were ass umed to remain internal to the site.

Source: Amended Village 7 Specific Plan Project (2024) ; Fehr & Peers, 202 6.

Table 3 displays the trip generation estimate for the Village 7 B Amendment based on its proposed land use s and the same version of ITE ’s Trip Generation Manual . Use of trip rates from the 2003 version of the Trip Generation Manual enables direct comparisons of trips generated between the various specific plan land use concepts. The following key conclusions are drawn from Table 3 :
• The Village 7B Amendment would generate an additional 3,783 daily trips, 299 AM peak hour trips, and 334 PM peak hour trips more than the current Village 7 Specific Plan. • When compared to the more critical PM peak hour, the Village 7B Amendment generates 411 more external vehicle trips than the original Village 7 Specific Plan.

Table 3. Proposed Village 7 Specific Plan Trip Generation (7th Edition Trip Generation) Trip Rates Trips
Land Use Quantity1 Daily AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour Daily AM Peak Hour
PM Peak
Hour
Single - Family
Residential 2
2,605 du 9.57 0.75 1.01 24,930 1,954 2,631
Multi- family
Residential 3
1,315 du 6.72 0.51 0.62 8,837 671 815
Elementary
School
900
students 1.29 0.42 0.15 1,161 378 135
Community
Center 35 ksf 22.88 1.62 1.64 801 57 57
Gross Trips 35,729 3,060 3,638
Internal Trips 4- 3,883 - 511 - 391
External Trips 31,846 2,549 3,247
Notes:

1. du = dwelling units; ksf = thousand square feet.

2. The following project land use categories were included in the Single Family Residential dwelling unit count: Rural Residential, Country Estates, Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential.

3. The following project land use categories were included in the Multi - Family Residential dwelling unit count: Medium - High Density Residential and High Density Residential.

4. 50 percent of recreation center trips, 60 percent of school trips assumed to remain internal to the site for daily, AM, and PM peak hours. Additionally, in the daily and PM peak hours, an additional 5 percent total residential - toresidential trips were ass umed to remain internal to the site.

Source: Table 4.3 - 5 of the Village 7 Specific Plan Project DEIR (2009 ), Fehr & Peers , 202 6.

Attachment 6
664
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 5
Changed Conditions
Since the Village 7 DEIR was certified in 2010, there have been numerous changes to the transportation network in the project area along with various regulatory changes . Additionally, analytical methods used in transportation analyses have also evolved . These changed conditions are documented below.

Changes to the Environmental Setting
As noted in Chapter 4.3 of the DEIR, t he environmental setting for transportation represents approximate 2005 - 2006 conditions, despite the DEIR’s 2009 release date. The issuance of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the DEIR establishes the date of the environmental setting.

The environmental setting covered a large geographic area including most of the City of Lincoln, parts of unincorporated Placer County, Roseville, and Caltrans facilities. The following describes major changes to the roadway network within the Lincoln area between 2005 - 2006 (see DEIR Figure

4.3 - 2) and current (2025) conditions:
• The SR 65 Bypass was constructed from existing SR 65 (at Lincoln Boulevard ) to north of Sheridan where it reconnects with the original highway . The facility is a four - lane freeway from Lincoln Boulevard to north of Ferrari Ranch Road , transitioning to a two - to four - lane expressway with at - grade intersections as it continues north .
• A new interchange was constructed on the SR 65 Bypass at Ferrari Ranch Road . • Moore Road was changed to a cul - de - sac on either side of the SR 65 Bypass. • Construction of Sorrento Parkway between Moore Road and Ferrari Ranch Road has occurred.

Notwithstanding the above, the arterial street system in Lincoln has generally not changed much in the past two decades (though new development north of SR 193 is adding streets) . Many intersections studied in the DEIR still have the same lane configurations and traffic controls.

The roadway network has changed more dramatically to the south of Lincoln, as evidenced by the following:
• New interchanges are constructed on SR 65 at Whitney Ranch Parkway and Sunset Boulevard.

The Sunset Boulevard interchange replaced its at - grade intersection. • The first phase of the four - phase I - 80/SR 65 interchange improvements are completed. This eliminated the northbound SR 65 bottleneck immediately north of I - 80.

Bicycle and pedestrian facilities have been added in Lincoln as new development has occurred. In 2024, the City updated its Neighborhood Electric Vehicle (NEV) plan. NEV’s are allowed on any roadway within Lincoln that has a speed limit of 35 MPH or less and on approved NEV lanes.

At the time the DEIR was prepared, the City of Lincoln operated Lincoln Transit, which provided fixed - route transit service to the city . This service was discontinued about a decade ago, with service now provided by Placer County Transit.

Although not directly related to the transportation system per se, substantial land development has occurred throughout south Placer County over the past two decades. To illustrate, Table 4.3 - 13 of the Attachment 6
665
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 6
DEIR indicates that SR 65 north of Sunset Boulevard carried 47,500 Average Daily Trips (ADT) in 2005. That segment carried 77,000 ADT in 2022, corresponding to an annual 3% growth rate.

Changes to the Regulatory Setting
There have also been numerous changes to the regulatory setting in the past two decades. By far, the most notable and far - reaching change is the following:
• Senate Bill (SB) 743 mandates that CEQA documents no longer use delay - based metrics such as intersection level of service ( LOS ) for purposes of identifying a proposed project’s significant impacts to the transportation network. Instead, a new metric known as vehicle miles traveled ( VMT ) is typically used.

Caltrans has modified how they approach management of state highway facilities. The following two documents illustrate this:
• 2020 VMT - Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide (TISG ) - provides guidance on how Caltrans will review land use projects, with focus on VMT analysis and supporting state land use goals, state planning priorities, and GHG emission reduction goals , as well as identifying land use projects’ possible transportation impacts to the State Highway System and potential non - capacity increasing mitigation measures. The TISG indicates that Caltrans intends to “transition away from requesting LOS or other vehicl e ope rations analyses of land use projects,” instead placing the focus on VMT and safety. • 2024 Local Development Review (LDR) Safety Review Practitioners Guidance – advises practitioners how to evaluate project - related safety impacts on the state highway system.

The analytical approach described in the guidance focuses on vulnerable road users (i.e., bicyclists and pedestrians) and underserved communities. It prescribes specific methods and thresholds for analyzing and mitigating for the safety effects associated with vehicle queues spilling from freeway off - ramps back to the freeway. It also re iterates Caltrans ’ support for shifting away from using delay - based metrics for analysis in CEQA.

The above guidance documents are in direct contrast to the LOS - focused guidance contained in the Guide for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (Caltrans, 2002). That document is cited in the References section of the DEIR transportation chapter.

Changes in Analytical Methods
There have also been numerous changes in how the roadway network is analyzed since the DEIR was published . The following lists several of the more important changes:
• Intersection analysis in the DEIR was performed using the 2000 Edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) . This was the 4 th edition, which has since been updated three times with the most recent document being the 7 th edition released in 2022. • Intersection analysis within Lincoln and Roseville relied on the “Circular 212” methodology.

This methodology is no longer utilized by either jurisdiction.

The City of Roseville, City of Lincoln, and Placer County have all prepared and released updated traffic impact study guidelines since the DEIR was released.

Attachment 6
666
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 7
Additionally, it is noted that new methods for estimating the internalization of project trips from mixed - use land development were still in development at the time the DEIR was prepared. In the year 2010’s , researchers from EPA, several academic institutions, and Fehr & Peers released the Mixed - Use Trip Generation Model (MXD), which is now utilized in countless traffic studies and EIRs to estimate internal trips and external trips made by walking, biking, a nd taking transit. This tool was not available whe n the DEIR was being prepared.

Standards of Significance
As the purpose of this memo is to determine if the proposed Village 7 B Amendment would cause new or more severe transportation impacts (relative to those identified in the Village 7 DEIR 2009) , this memorandum utilizes the same significance thresholds as were utilized in the DEIR. Those thresholds are listed on the following page.

Roadway System

1. Change the level of service from acceptable (LOS C or better) to unacceptable (LOS D or worse) at study intersections within and controlled by the City of Lincoln.

2. Increase the average delay by five or more seconds at an intersection in Lincoln that currently (or is projected to) operate unacceptably.

3. Change the level of service on study roadways or intersections within the City of Roseville or Placer County from acceptable to unacceptable (as defined by those jurisdictions).

4. Increase the v/c ratio by 0.01 or more at an intersection or roadway in Placer County that currently (or is projected to) operate unacceptably.

5. Worsen operations from LOS E or better to LOS F on a freeway, or from LOS D or better to LOS E or F on a state highway.

6. Increase by five percent or greater the freeway density or highway percent time spent following at a facility that currently (or is projected to) operate unacceptably.

7. Interfere with or preclude planned transportation improvements such as roadway widenings/extensions or trail facilities.

8. Add traffic to a facility not constructed to current design standards, thereby resulting in substantially worsened conditions relating to traffic flow, safety, or driver convenience.

9. Create vehicular travel demand above that which is planned, thereby resulting in cumulative level of service impacts.

10. Create a temporary, but prolonged impact due to lane closures, need for temporary signals, emergency vehicle access, traffic hazards to bikes/pedestrians, damage to roadbed, or truck traffic on roadways not designated as truck routes.

Transit System

1. Create a demand for public transit services above the capacity which is provided, or planned.

2. Interfere with existing or planned transit services or facilities.

Bicycle and Pedestrian System

1. Disrupt or interfere with existing or planned bicycle and pedestrian facilities.

2. Create inconsistencies with adopted pedestrian or bicycle system plans, guidelines, policies, or standards.

Attachment 6
667
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 8
Project Access and Internal Circulation

1. Provide inadequate access and internal circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, or bicyclists.

Impacts Assessment
The California Fourth Appellate District Court of Appeals published findings of a case known as Olen Properties Corp. v. City of Newport Beach (2023) . Th e findings of th is case provide important insights into how to approach this impacts assessment . At issue in that case was whether a new EIR was required for a change to a 2006 program EIR . The court affirmed the use of an addendum to the 2006 Program EIR to analyze the effects of the project change. Key passages from the court ruling pertaining to this study are:

1. “In 2018, California adopted CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3,2 which changed the measure of traffic impact from level of service (LOS) to vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The 2006 EIR used the LOS measure, as it predated the change to VMT by more than a decade . The traffic study for the Project was conducted in 2020, but also used the LOS measure because the purpose of the study was to compare the effects of the Project to the 2006 EIR .”

2. “And it is settled law in California that subsequent changes to the (CEQA) guidelines are not “new information” triggering section 21166, subdivision (c), so long as the underlying environmental issue was understood at the time of the initial EIR. ( Concerned Dublin Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 1301, 1318 - 1320.) Indeed, the rule could hardly be any different —if each change to guidelines constituted “new information,” section 21166 would require a new EIR nearly every time any change is m ade to a project, no matter how inconsequential.

3. “Accordingly, we conclude the City of Newport Beach was not required to undertake a VMT study of the traffic impact of the Project. ”
Hence, t he remainder of this section focuses on how the Village 7 B Amendment would change the significance and severity of the 2009 DEIR transportation impacts. Table 4 summarizes these results for each of the 15 impact statement s. Note that the evaluation is necessarily p rimarily qualitative given the nature of this work, lack of availability of prior tools used in the analysis, and other considerations. Where additional impacts were qualitatively identified, roadway segment daily volumes or freeway segment peak hour densities were scaled using the proportional increase in daily or peak hour traffic volumes, respectively. This methodology was applied to evaluate whether the incremental trips associated with the proposed Village 7B Amendment would generate a new significant impact or materially alter any previously identified impact.

Impact 4.3 - 1, which pertains to intersection operations in the City of Lincoln, has been expanded to include an impact analysis under both the original EIR setting (i.e., 2006) and current ( fall 2025) conditions. By including both time periods, reviewers can understand the degree to which changes to the environmental setting cause differences in project impacts at city intersections.

Attachment 6
668
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 9
Table 4. Existing Impacts Summary Table
2009 DEIR Finding 2026 Assessment
Impact Impact
Significant?
Recommended
Mitigation
Level of Significance
After Mitigation Expected Level of Significance

4.3 - 1 The Proposed Project would not
worsen (to a significant level)
unacceptable operations at City of Lincoln
intersections (excluding those in
downtown on SR 65 which are described
separately) under existing plus project
conditions.

No None Less than Significant
Less than Significant (2009 DEIR existing setting as baseline condition). The existing plus project intersection operations results from the Village 7 Specific Plan showed all study intersections in Lincoln would operate at LOS A or B. It is unlikely that the additional PM peak hour trips associated with the proposed land use added to the City’s then 2006 roadway network would result in an LOS D or worse.

Less than Significant (Fall 2025 as existing setting). An updated level of service evaluation based on fall 2025 conditions was completed at ten critical City of Lincoln intersections . The analysis, found in Attachment A, shows that the net increase in vehicle trips between the proposed Village 7B project and the approved Village 7B Amendment would not worsen an intersection in Lincoln to an unacceptable level and would not exacerbate already unacceptable conditions to a significant degree.

4.3 - 2 The Proposed Project could
temporarily worsen unacceptable
operations on State Route 65 in downtown
Lincoln under existing plus project
conditions if occupancy of the Proposed
Project occurs prior to the completion of
the SR 65 Bypass.

Yes None
Short - term
Significant and
Unavoidable
Less than Significant
Construction of the SR 65 Bypass is complete .

4.3 - 3 The Proposed Project would not
cause operations at any intersections in
Roseville to worsen to an unacceptable
level under existing plus project
conditions.

No None Less than Significant
Less than Significant
Added project trips would be dispersed throughout the South Placer County roadway network. Added project traffic to an individual City of Roseville intersection would be modest . Additionally, facilities most likely to be adversely affected (along Fiddyment Road) have now been upgraded with roadway widenings and new signals .

4.3 - 4 The Proposed Project would not
result in unacceptable levels of service at
any intersections in Placer County under
existing plus project conditions.

No None Less than Significant
Less than Significant
The project would add a net increase of about 60 PM peak hour trips to Fiddyment Road south of Moore Road (in Placer County).

This added volume is not sufficient to degrade to an unacceptable level the Fiddyment Road/Athens Avenue study intersection.

Attachment 6
669
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 10 2009 DEIR Finding 2026 Assessment
Impact Impact
Significant?
Recommended
Mitigation
Level of Significance
After Mitigation Expected Level of Significance

4.3 - 5 The Proposed Project would worsen
to an unacceptable level or further worsen
already unacceptable operations at three
locations on SR 65 south of Lincoln under
existing plus project conditions.

Yes
Pay applicable
SPRTA Fee
Significant and
Unavoidable
Significant and Unavoidable
The Village 7 B Amendment would add trips to SR 65 south of the Twelve Bridges Drive interchange . The f ollowing summarizes the Amendment’s effects on SR 65 south of Lincoln:

1. The 2009 DEIR determined that project trips would result in impacts to three SR 65 facilities. The SR 65/Sun set Boulevard intersection and SR 65 NB On - Ramp from I - 80 Westbound segment were both identified as impacts because they
degraded from an acceptable to unacceptable LOS. This finding would remain with the proposed Village 7B Amendment . The 2009 DEIR determined that already unacceptable operations at the SR 65 NB Diagonal Off - Ramp to Galleria Boulevard would be exacerbated to a significant degree under the Village 7 Specific Plan . The proposed Amendment would not result in a substantial increase in that impact because the change in density (used to analyze freeway segments ) would be less than 5% threshold (i.e., the significance threshold used in the 2009 DEIR for freeway segments) .

2. There are three study freeway segments that would operate acceptably at LOS E with the project in the 2009 DEIR (see Table 4.3 - 7). These segments are SR 65 NB On - Ramp from Galleria Boulevard, SR 65 NB Off - Ramp to Pleasant Grove Blvd , and SR 65 SB Off - Ramp to Galleria Blvd. The Amendment is anticipated to worsen conditions to an unacceptable LOS F at SB 65 NB Off - Ramp to Pleasant Grove Boulevard segment because the volumes on the freeway would result in a V/C ratio >1 and LOS F . The Amendment would not degrade the two other segments to LOS F.

Thus, the DEIR overall conclusions with respect to this impact would remain significant and unavoidable with one additional impacted segment . The mitigation would remain the same.

Attachment 6
670
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 11 2009 DEIR Finding 2026 Assessment
Impact Impact
Significant?
Recommended
Mitigation
Level of Significance
After Mitigation Expected Level of Significance

4.3 - 6 The Proposed Project would add
significant levels of traffic to Moore Road
between the project site and Fiddyment
Road, and to Fiddyment Road from Moore
Road to the south City limits, which are
not constructed to current design
standards.

Yes
Pay fair cost to
upgrade Moore
Road between
Fiddyment Road and
the western
Proposed Project
boundary, and
Fiddyment Road
from Moore Road to
the south City limits
Significant and
Unavoidable
Significant and Unavoidable
No change from 2009 DEIR conclusion. For this particular impact, the significan ce of the impact is determined by whether the project adds trips to a roadway not constructed to current design standards .

The amount of traffic being added plays no role in the determination of the severity of the impact . Therefore, the proposed Village 7 B Amendment , which is anticipated to add 380 additional daily trips to Moore Road east of Fiddyment Road and 320 additional daily trips on Fiddyment Road south of Moore Road, would have the same conclusion regardin g the significance of the impact, the same mitigation measure (pay fair share) , and the same residual significance after mitigation.

4.3 - 7 The Proposed Project would add
significant levels of traffic to portions of
Nelson Lane, which is not constructed to
current design standards.

Yes None
Significant and
Unavoidable
Significant and Unavoidable
No change from 2009 DEIR conclusion. For this particular impact, the significance of the impact is determined by whether the project adds trips to a roadway not constructed to current design standards.

The amount of traffic being added plays no role in the determination of the severity of the impact . Therefore, the proposed Village 7B Amendment , which is anticipated to add 450 additional daily trips to Nelson Lane north of Moore Road, would have the same conclusion regarding the significance of the impact, the same mitigation measure (pay fair share) , and the same residual significance after mitigation.

4.3 - 8 The Proposed Project would provide
adequate facilities to accommodate its
planned transit demand.

No None Less than Significant
Less than Significant
No change from 2009 DEIR conclusion (based on how transit impacts were judged at the time).

4.3 - 9 The Proposed Project would provide
adequate on - site facilities to support
walking and bicycling.

No None Less than Significant
Less than Significant
No change from 2009 DEIR conclusion.

4.3 - 10 The Proposed Project would not
conflict with planned transportation
improvements.

No None Less than Significant
Less than Significant
No change from 2009 DEIR conclusion.

Attachment 6
671
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 12 2009 DEIR Finding 2026 Assessment
Impact Impact
Significant?
Recommended
Mitigation
Level of Significance
After Mitigation Expected Level of Significance

4.3 - 11 The Proposed Project would cause
temporary impacts along Moore Road
during construction - related activities.

Yes None feasible
Short - term
Significant and
Unavoidable
Less than Significant
Ferrari Ranch Road has been extended to Moore Road creating a secondary access point for construction. This was explicitly mentioned as a conditional impact consideration in the impact statement.

4.3 - 12 The Proposed Project would not
cause any cumulative impacts on the City
of Lincoln roadway system.

No None Less than Significant
Less than Significant
The DEIR concluded that all Lincoln study intersections would operate acceptably under cumulative conditions because the General Plan considered the Village 7 project . The City’s 2050 General Plan indicates that the study intersections on old SR 65 (now known as Lincoln Boulevard) are not subject to the LOS C operating standard. Table 4.3 - 9 indicates that no City of Lincoln study intersections are on the cusp of degrad ing from acceptable to unacceptable. Therefore, the added trips from the Amendment is not anticipated to cause a nother study intersection to operate unacceptably .

4.3 - 13 The Proposed Project would
worsen to an unacceptable level or further
worsen cumulatively unacceptable
operations (to a significant degree) on
roadway segments within Placer County.

Yes
Pay fair share cost
to improve the five
Placer County
roadway segments
significantly
impacted by the
Proposed Project
Significant and
Unavoidable
Significant and Unavoidable
Table 4.3 - 10 shows that the DEIR project cause d significant impacts at five of the seven study segments in Placer County. The two non - impacted segments were:

1. Athens Avenue west of Industrial Avenue. The proposed Amendment would cause this segment to carry an additional (rounded) 60 vehicles per day, but the LOS would remain at an acceptable LOS C.

2. Industrial Avenue south of Twelve Bridges Drive . The project would cause this segment to carry an additional (rounded) 140 vehicles per day, but the LOS would remain at an acceptable LOS D (given this segment is within ½ mile of a freeway ).

The severity of impacts at the five impacted Placer County roadway segments would not increase as the net effect of proposed Village 7B Amendment trips would be less than a 0.01 V/C ratio increase (i.e., the significance threshold used in the 2009 DEIR for Placer County roadways). Thus, the added trips would not exacerbate to a substantial degree cumulatively unacceptable conditions.

Attachment 6
672
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 13 2009 DEIR Finding 2026 Assessment
Impact Impact
Significant?
Recommended
Mitigation
Level of Significance
After Mitigation Expected Level of Significance

4.3 - 14 The Proposed Project would
worsen cumulatively unacceptable
operations (to a significant degree) on
State Route 193 and State Route 65
through Placer County, Rocklin, and
Roseville.

Yes
Pay SPRTA Fees to
help widen SR 65 to
six lanes, and pay
fair share cost to
make improvements
to the SR 193/Sierra
College Boulevard
intersection
Significant and
Unavoidable
Significant and Unavoidable
The 2009 DEIR concluded that then proposed project would impact 1 intersection and 18 different freeway/highway segments under cumulative conditions (per Table 4.13 - 12 of 2009 DEIR ). The Amendment would not substantially increase the impact at the 18 impacted segments. However, t he Amendment would cause an impact on two additional segments: SR 65 Diagonal On - Ramp from Sunset Boulevard and SR 65 SB Loop On - Ramp from Pleasant Grove Boulevard . The addition of Village 7 B Amendment trips would result in a 5% increase in density for these two segments already operating at LOS F (i.e., the significance threshold used in the 2009 DEIR for freeways) . However, the type of mitigation and residual significance after mitig ation would not change.

4.3 - 15 The Proposed Project would cause
a significant cumulative impact at one
intersection located in the City of
Roseville.

Yes None feasible.

Significant and
Unavoidable
Significant and Unavoidable
This impact was deemed significant and unavoidable because the affected intersection (SR 65 NB Ramps/Pleasant Grove Boulevard) is outside the City of Lincoln and therefore the city does not have the ability to ensure improvements to it are made. Of the 179 signalized intersections in the City of Roseville studied under Cumulative No Project and Cumulative Plus Project Conditions in the 2009 DEIR , the Blue Oaks Blvd/West Side Dr (now Westbrook Blvd) intersection experienced a 0.12 v/c ratio increase (from 0. 18 to

0.30), four intersections experienced a 0.02 or 0.03 v/c ratio increase, and 30 intersections experienced a 0.01 v/c ratio increase.

All other intersections had either no change or a beneficial v/c ratio change. Following evaluates the 35 total inter sections that had v/c ratio increases:
- Blue Oaks Blvd/West Side Drive – Village 7B Amendment would not worsen operations to an unacceptable level given its LOS A operations.
- Of the 34 intersections experiencing a 0.03 , 0.02 , or 0.01 v/c ratio increase in the 2009 DEIR, none were on the verge of worsening from acceptable (LOS C or better) to unacceptable (LOS D or worse).

Source: 2009 Village 7 Specific Plan Draft EIR (2009); Fehr & Peers, 202 6.

Attachment 6
673
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Consistency Memo | 14 Potential for New Significant Impact Statements
As part of this analysis, the potential for significant new transportation impacts not previously identified in the 2009 DEIR were reviewed. Through this comprehensive screening, two topics were identified that warranted additional evaluation. The 2009 DEIR analyzed each of the topics below and concluded project impacts to them would be less than significant.

Impact #1 : The significance criterion pertaining to two - lane state highways utilizes an acceptable operating standard of LOS D. Hence, a project - related degradation from LOS D or better to LOS E or worse would be considered a significant impact. The following evaluat es the susceptibility of study roadway segments along SR 65 and SR 193 being impacted by the proposed Village 7 B Amendment:
• Table 4.3 - 6 (Existing Plus Project Intersection Operations): The 2009 DEIR project only caused an impact at one such intersection (SR 65/Sunset Boulevard) and it was discussed in Impact

4.3.5. Based on the amount of added traffic the proposed Amendment would generate, the directionality of those trips and the results in Table 4.3 - 6, the Village 7B Amendment would not cause any new impacts at other state highway intersections. • Table 4.3 - 7 (Existing Plus Project Highway Operations ): All f our highway segments operated at an unacceptable LOS E without and with the 2009 DEIR project. The significance threshold for exacerbating an unacceptable condition on a state highway is a 5% or greater increase in the percent time spent following (PTSF). Table 4.3 - 7 indicates that the 2009 DEIR project increased the PTSF for each segment by 1 to 3% . Hence, impacts were not deemed significant. Given that the proposed Amendment represents about a 15% increase in external peak hour trips, the PTSF would not i ncrease to 5%. Hence, impacts would also be less than significant for the proposed Village 7B Amendment.

Note that the 2009 DEIR did not analyze SR 65 and SR 193 two - lane highway segments under cumulative conditions.

Impact # 2: The Fiddyment Road/Athens Avenue intersection (located in unincorporated Placer County) was shown in Table 4.3 - 9 (Cumulative Intersection Operations) as worsening from LOS C to D during the PM peak hour due to the 2009 DEIR project. However, it was not identified as a cumulative impact. A footnote in the table indicates that “ This intersection is shown as LOS D in Table 5- 28 in the 2050 Lincoln General Plan DEIR under cumulative mitigated conditions. ” While the purpose of this comment is not enti rely clear, it may suggest the General Plan EIR had acknowledged that projects included in the City’s General Plan (including Village 7) were expected to cause this intersection to worsen to an unacceptable LOS D condition. The Village 7B Amendment would add 14 southbound through trips during the PM peak hour to this intersection. Review of the detailed LOS calculation indicates that movement was “critical” from the Circular 212 methodology employed at the time. Mathematically, adding 14 tri ps to this criti cal movement increases the overall v/c ratio by

0.003. Hence, added trips from the Village 7B Amendment would increase the v/c ratio at this intersection from 0.850 to 0.853. The significance criteria for exacerbating an unacceptable condition at Placer County was a 0.01 increase in the v/c ratio. The Village 7 B Amendment v/c ratio increase was far less than that. Therefore, the Village 7B Amendment would not further degrade unacceptable operations at this intersection to a significant degree.

Attachments
Attachment A: Year 2025 Existing Conditions and Existing Plus Project Level of Service Results Attachment 6
674
Attachment A: Year 2025 Existing Conditions and Existing Plus Project Level of Service Results
An updated level of service evaluation was completed using traffic count data from 2025 to determine if the proposed Village 7B amendment would result in any new significant impacts specific to Impact Statement 4.3-1 in the Village 7 Specific Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report . This particular impact statement, which pertains to intersection operations at City of Lincoln intersections, is especially critical to fully analyze given how different current study area conditions are versus what was present when the EIR analysis was conducted in 2006.

This analysis was completed for the following three scenarios:
• Existing Conditions (using 2025 traffic count data)
• Existing Plus Current Village 7B Conditions
• Existing Plus Proposed Village 7B Conditions
This analysis evaluates the effects of the land use changes in the subarea of the Village 7 Specific Plan north of Moore Road, also known as Village 7B, on the roadway network. This evaluates whether the proposed Village 7B amendment would result in any significant impacts to nearby intersections in the City of Lincoln. Ten intersections were selected for analysis based on their expected usage by project trips and susceptibility of being impacted. The list was agreed upon by City of Lincoln staff.

This evaluation was completed using Synchro 12.0 software and relied on the methodology outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual , 7
th Edition . Trip generation for the two Plus Project scenarios was based on ITE’s Trip Generation Manual , 12th Edition as presented in the “Lincoln Village 7B Specific Plan Amendment – Project Travel Characteristics Memorandum” dated November 25, 2025. Trip distribution generally followed the Cumulative Year Project Trip Distribution figure from the Project Travel Characteristics Memorandum, but modifications were made to reflect the existing roadway network and lack of development in areas to the south (i.e., Placer Ranch/Sunset Industrial) and west (i.e., Village 5) which could attract project trips.

Overall, all intersections operate at LOS C or better during the PM peak hour (noting that the City’s LOS policy only pertains to this time period) and no significant impacts were identified per the City of Lincoln’s significance criteria.

Accordingly, the Draft EIR conclusions with regard to Impact 4.3-1 are the same regardless of whether project effects are judged relative to then 2006 conditions or current 2025 conditions.

Attachment 6
675
Table 1: Village 7B Existing and Existing Plus Project Intersection Level of Service Results Intersection Intersection
Control Peak Hour
Existing Conditions Existing Plus Current
Village 7B Conditions1
Existing Plus Proposed
Village 7B Conditions2
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Fiddyment Rd /
Moore Rd AWSC AMPM

7.7 8.5
A
A

8.0 8.9
A
A

8.2 9.2
A
A
2 Nelson Ln / Moore
Road TWSC AMPM

5.3 (9.1)

5.5 (9.6)
A (A)
A (A)

4.5 (9.9)

5.5 (11.0)
A (A)
A (B)

4.3 (10.5)

5.7 (12.2)
A (B)
A (B)
3 Caledon Cir (W) /
Ferrari Ranch Rd Signal AMPM

28.0 19.4
C
B

30.9 20.7
C
C

33.1 21.7
C
C
4 SR 65 SB Ramps /
Ferrari Ranch Rd Signal AMPM

5.9 5.6
A
A

6.0 5.6
A
A

7.1 5.7
A
A
5 SR 65 NB Ramps /
Ferrari Ranch Rd Signal AMPM

10.5 11.7
B
B

10.9 13.3
B
B

11.3 14.6
B
B
6 Ferrari Ranch Rd /
Groveland Ln Signal AMPM

23.0 26.4
C
C

23.3 27.6
C
C

23.4 28.4
C
C
7 Joiner Pkwy /
Ferrari Ranch Rd Signal AMPM

24.6 24.6
C
C

24.9 24.9
C
C

25.0 25.0
C
C
8 Joiner Pkwy /
Moore Rd AWSC AMPM

33.6 15.5
D
C

34.8 15.8
D
C

35.5 16.0
E
C
9 Lincoln Blvd /
Ferrari Ranch Rd Signal AMPM

25.0 24.9
C
C

25.0 25.0
C
C

25.0 25.0
C
C
10 Joiner Pkwy /
Nicolaus Rd Signal AMPM

22.0 21.1
C
C

22.5 21.6
C
C

22.9 22.0
C
C
Bold indicates unacceptable operations.

1. “Current Village 7B” includes the land use from the current Village 7 Specific Plan dated May 14, 2024 for the area north of Moore Road.

2. “Proposed Village 7B” includes the proposed land use for the area north of Moore Road.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2026.

Attachment 6
676
P
Appendix B. Lincoln Village
7B Specific Plan
Amendment – Project
Travel Characteristics
Memorandum
Attachment 6
677
Technical Memorandum
Date: November 25, 2025
To: Nick Pappani, Raney Planning and Management
From: Ashley Weiss, John Gard, and Zoey Li, Fehr & Peers Subject: Lincoln Village 7B Specific Plan Amendment – Project Travel Characteristics Memorandum RS25-4413
Introduction
This memorandum documents the project travel characteristics for the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment project (“Amendment”). The Village 7 Specific Plan is located in the southwest area of the City of Lincoln, along both sides of Ferrari Ranch Road. The Amendment includes modified land uses for the most northern portion of the Village 7 Specific Plan area north of Moore Road. This area is known as the Scheiber and Aitken Ranch II properties, and also known as the “Village 7B area”. The Village 7B area is currently vacant and will connect to the remaining portions of the Village 7 Specific Plan area via Liberty Parkway and Moore Road.

This memorandum also documents the exploration of available travel demand models (TDMs) to be considered for use in analyzing the Amendment including a comparison of the suitability of the various models. The Amendment’s expected trip distribution is also included based on output from the recommended travel demand model.

The purpose of this memorandum is to seek approval of these trip characteristics by City of Lincoln staff to move forward with the local transportation analysis. A separate transportation impact assessment is underway to support the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) environmental review for the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment.

Project Description
The Original Village 7 Specific Plan, adopted in 2009, was updated in 2024 to reflect minor adjustments to the proposed land uses (hereinto referred to as the “Current Village 7 Specific Plan”).

The Current Village 7 Specific Plan includes the following land uses:
1 • 1,181 units of Low Density Residential
• 1,529 units of Medium Density Residential
• 575 units of High Density Residential
• Elementary School (assumed in Village 7 DEIR to have 900-student capacity) • 4.9 acre Mixed Use Commercial (Assumed in DEIR as 15,000 sq. ft. Community Center) • 58 acres of Parks and Recreation
1 Source: V7SP - 00.1 Cover Page-Feb2024.indd
Attachment 6
678
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 2
The Amendment would reduce the amount of Parks and Recreation space by 2.7 acres, while also modifying the density of several parcels zoned for residential uses. It would result in the following net changes in land uses:
• Reduce amount of Low Density Residential by 181 units. • Increase amount of Medium-High Density Residential by 740 units. • Increase amount of Medium Density Residential by 69 units. • Increase amount of Country Estates Residential by 7 units. • Add a 20,000 square feet Community Center.

The net effect of the above is an increase of 635 units. All of these proposed changes occur on the Scheiber and Aitken Ranch II properties north of Moore Road. The Current Village 7 Specific Plan site plan and the Amendment land use are provided in Figure 1.

In addition to the modifications to the Scheiber and Aitken Ranch II properties, this Amendment also includes a small portion of Village 5 abutting the Aitken Ranch II and Schieber properties to the west that would change the planned seven units of Rural Residential to 30 units of Low Density Residential.

Figure 2 shows the Village 5 Amendment area.

Project Trip Generation
Trip generation refers to the process of estimating the amount of vehicular traffic a project would add to the surrounding roadway network. The Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment project’s (i.e., buildout of Village 7 with land use changes described above) trip generation was estimated using trip rates published in the Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers [ITE], September 2025). Table 1 presents the estimated number of daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour vehicle trips for the proposed Amendment broken up into the different areas of the Specific Plan, including the Village 5 area. As shown, the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment is estimated to generate 35,509 daily, 3,135 AM peak hour and 3,418 PM peak hour trips prior to any adjustments for internal trip-making.

It should be noted that the medium density units, which have an average density of 8.7 units per acre, were conservatively assumed as single-family detached units for analysis purposes. Additionally, it is noted that details regarding the number of floors of high density residential (i.e., an input to trip generation calculations) was not available. So, to ensure a reasonably conservative approach, low rise (versus mid rise) multi-family was assumed for the medium high and high density residential uses.

Fehr & Peers used the mixed-use trip generation (MXD) tool to estimate the internalization of project trips (i.e., travel between residential and school). The MXD model was originally developed by academics and researchers for the EPA and has since been updated several times by Fehr & Peers to improve its validation. According to the MXD output, approximately 9% of daily, 15% of AM, and 8% of PM peak hour trips are expected to be remain internal to the site. After adjusting for these trips that do not leave the project area, the Amendment is estimated to generate 32,384 daily, 2,680 AM peak, and 3,151 PM peak external vehicle trips.

Attachment 6
679
Current Village 7 Specific Plan Land Use and Proposed Amendment FIGURE 1
Source: City of Lincoln, November 2025
 &20081,7<'(6,*1)5$0(:25.
63(&,),&3/$1 )HEUXDU\ 
)LJXUH
,OOXVWUDWLYH/DQG8VH3ODQ
,
Separate Proposed
Annexation Area
3D SOUTH

SORRENTO

LINCOLN

CROSSING

AUBURN RAVINE

NORTH INGRAM SLOUGH

INGRAM SLOUGH

SOUTH INGRAM SLOUGH

MOORE ROAD

SHALLUS BOULEVARD

FERRARI RANCH ROAD

LIBERTY PARKWAY

MOORE ROAD

MOORE ROAD
VLDR

7.6 Ac
VLDR

25.1 Ac
VMDR

11.3 Ac
VMDR

6.3 Ac
VMU

4.9 Ac
VPR

10.4 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

5.1 Ac
VHDR

12.3 Ac
VLDR

40.9 Ac
VLDR

27.4 Ac
VLDR

14.0 Ac
VLDR

5.9 Ac
VMDR

18.6 Ac VMDR

12.3 Ac
VMDR

57.6 Ac
VPR

2.6 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
ES

16.6 Ac
VHDR

19.1 Ac
VLDR

12.4 Ac
VLDR

11.6 Ac
VMDR

12.1 Ac
VPR

3.8 Ac
VPR

1.6 Ac
VMDR

9.4 Ac
VOS

13.1 Ac
VOS

2.8 Ac
VOS
120.4 Ac
VCE

2.4 Ac
VLDR

6.4 Ac
VLDR

4.4 Ac VMHDR

14.4 Ac
VMU

4.1 Ac
VOS

10.8 Ac
VOS

0.9 Ac
VPR

5.3 Ac
VMDR

17.9 Ac VLDR

6.6 Ac
VMDR

8.0 Ac
VLDR

4.0 Ac VMHDR

10.6 Ac
VMHDR

12.5 Ac
VMDR

5.0 Ac
VLDR

3.7 Ac
VOS

7.3 Ac
VMDR

3.1 Ac
VMHDR

3.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

2.6 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.5 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP
LP 0.7 Ac

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.8 Ac
LP

0.6 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

2.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
LP

4.0 Ac
LP

2.0 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP

MP MP MP
MP

MP MP MP
Document Path: P:\18484\PLN\Applications\_2025_Scheiber_SP & GDP Revisions\FIGURES\CAD_GIS_Files\SP_Figure 4-1 Land Use Plan.mxd SP Figure 4-1: Land Use Plan
I
Legend
VOS - Open Space Preserve or Trail Corridor
VPR - Parks and Recreation
VOS/LP - Linear Parkways
VOS/MP - Major Paseos
VHDR - High Density Residential
VMHDR - Medium High Density Residential
VMDR - Medium Density Residential
VLDR - Low Density Residential
VCE - Country Estates
VMU - Neighborhood Commercial
ES - Elementary School
ROW - Major ROW
Bridge Spans
,
Separate Proposed
Annexation Area
3D SOUTH

SORRENTO

LINCOLN

CROSSING

AUBURN RAVINE

NORTH INGRAM SLOUGH

INGRAM SLOUGH

SOUTH INGRAM SLOUGH

MOORE ROAD

SHALLUS BOULEVARD

FERRARI RANCH ROAD

LIBERTY PARKWAY

MOORE ROAD

MOORE ROAD
VLDR

7.6 Ac
VLDR

25.1 Ac
VMDR

11.3 Ac
VMDR

6.3 Ac
VMU

4.9 Ac
VPR

10.4 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

5.1 Ac
VHDR

12.3 Ac
VLDR

40.9 Ac
VLDR

27.4 Ac
VLDR

14.0 Ac
VLDR

5.9 Ac
VMDR

18.6 Ac VMDR

12.3 Ac
VMDR

57.6 Ac
VPR

2.6 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
ES

16.6 Ac
VHDR

19.1 Ac
VLDR

12.4 Ac
VLDR

11.6 Ac
VMDR

12.1 Ac
VPR

3.8 Ac
VPR

1.6 Ac
VMDR

9.4 Ac
VOS

13.1 Ac
VOS

2.8 Ac
VOS
120.4 Ac
VCE

2.4 Ac
VLDR

6.4 Ac
VLDR

4.4 Ac VMHDR

14.4 Ac
VMU

4.1 Ac
VOS

10.8 Ac
VOS

0.9 Ac
VPR

5.3 Ac
VMDR

17.9 Ac VLDR

6.6 Ac
VMDR

8.0 Ac
VLDR

4.0 Ac VMHDR

10.6 Ac
VMHDR

12.5 Ac
VMDR

5.0 Ac
VLDR

3.7 Ac
VOS

7.3 Ac
VMDR

3.1 Ac
VMHDR

3.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

2.6 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.5 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP
LP 0.7 Ac

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.8 Ac
LP

0.6 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

2.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
LP

4.0 Ac
LP

2.0 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP

MP MP MP
MP

MP MP MP
I
Legend
VOS - Open Space Preserve or Trail Corridor
VPR - Parks and Recreation
VOS/LP - Linear Parkways
VOS/MP - Major Paseos
VHDR - High Density Residential
VMHDR - Medium High Density Residential
VMDR - Medium Density Residential
VLDR - Low Density Residential
VCE - Country Estates
VMU - Neighborhood Commercial
ES - Elementary School
ROW - Major ROW
Bridge Spans
Attachment 6
680
Village 5 Specific Plan Land Use Amendment
FIGURE 2
Source: City of Lincoln, November 2025
Attachment 6
681
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 5
Table 1: Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment Trip Generation (ITE 12th Edition) Land Use1 Quantity Unit
Trip Rates 1
Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour In Out Total In Out Total
Village 7B Area
Single-Family Detached Housing2 465 du 9.1 0.7 0.9 4,227 88 238 326 268 164 432 Multi-family Housing (Low-Rise)3 740 du 6.2 0.4 0.5 4,595 73 230 303 239 146 385 Recreational Community Center 20 ksf 28.80 2.00 2.90 576 26 14 40 28 30 58 Public Park 5.3 acres 0.8 0.0 0.2 4 0 0 0 1 0 1
Subtotal Village 7B Area 9,402 187 482 669 535 341 876
Remainder of Village 7
Single-Family Detached Housing2 2,140 du 9.1 0.7 0.9 19,453 404 1,094 1,498 1,234 756 1,990 Multi-family Housing (Low-Rise) 3 575 du 6.2 0.4 0.5 3,571 57 179 236 185 114 299 Recreational Community Center 25 ksf 28.84 2.04 2.88 721 34 17 51 35 37 72 Elementary School 900 students 2.27 0.73 0.16 2,043 355 302 657 66 78 144 Public Park 50.0 acres 0.8 0.1 0.2 39 2 1 3 5 3 8
Subtotal Remainder of Village 7 25,827 851 1,594 2,445 1,525 988 2,513 Village 5 Area
Single-Family Detached Housing2 30 du 9.1 0.7 0.9 273 6 15 21 17 11 28 Public Park 9.2 acres 0.8 0.0 0.1 7 0 0 0 1 0 1
Subtotal Village 5 Area 280 6 15 21 18 11 29
Gross Trips 35,509 1,044 2,091 3,135 2,078 1,340 3,418
Internal Trips4 -3,125 -151 -303 -455 -162 -105 -267
External Trips 32,384 893 1,788 2,680 1,916 1,235 3,151 Notes:

1. Trip rates based on weighted average trip rates from the following land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual 12th Edition: 210 - Single Family Detached Housing, 220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low Rise), 495 – Recreational Community Center, 520 – Elementary School, and 411 – Public Park.

Attachment 6
682
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 6

2. The following land use categories were included in the Single Family Detached Housing dwelling unit count: Rural Residential, Country Estates, Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential.

3. The following land use categories were included in the Multi-Family Housing (Low Rise) dwelling unit count: Medium-High Density Residential and High Density Residential.

4. Internalization reduction based on Fehr & Peers’ MXD tool used for estimating trip generation for mixed-use developments.

Source: Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition; Fehr & Peers, 2025.

Attachment 6
683
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 7
Comparison of Specific Plan Trip Generation
To enable a direct trip generation comparison of the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment to the current Village 7 Specific Plan, the same analysis methods and techniques described in the previous section were applied for this comparison. As shown in Table 2, the current Village 7 Specific Plan, the project could generate up to 28,343 daily trips, 2,419 AM peak hour and 2,813 PM peak hour external vehicular trips.

The trip generation comparison is shown in Table 3. As shown, the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment would generate 4,041 more daily, 261 more AM peak hour, and 338 more PM peak hour trips compared to land uses assumed under the Current Village 7 Specific Plan.

Table 3: Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment - Changes in External Vehicle Trips Scenario Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment 32,384 893 1,788 2,680 1,916 1,235 3,151 Current Village 7 Specific Plan 28,343 815 1,604 2,419 1,714 1,099 2,813 Difference 4,041 78 184 261 202 136 338
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2025.

Attachment 6
684
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 8
Table 2: Village 7 Specific Plan Original Trip Generation (ITE 12th Edition) Land Use1 Quantity Unit
Trip Rates 1
Daily
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Daily AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour In Out Total In Out Total
Village 7B Area
Single-Family Detached Housing2 570 du 9.1 0.7 0.9 5,181 108 291 399 329 201 530 Public Park 8.0 acres 0.8 0.0 0.1 6 0 0 0 1 0 1
Subtotal Village 7B Area 5,187 108 291 399 329 202 531
Remainder of Village 7
Single-Family Detached Housing2 2,140 du 9.1 0.7 0.9 19,453 404 1,094 1,498 1,234 756 1,990 Multi-family Housing (Low-Rise)3 575 du 6.2 0.4 0.5 3,571 57 179 236 185 114 299 Recreational Community Center 25 ksf 28.8 2.0 2.9 721 34 17 51 35 37 72 Elementary School 900 stude
nts 2.3 0.7 0.2 2,043 355 302 657 66 78 144
Public Park 50.0 acres 0.8 0.1 0.2 39 2 1 3 5 3 8
Subtotal Remainder of Village 7 25,827 851 1,594 2,445 1,525 988 2,513 Village 5 Area
Single-Family Detached Housing2 7 du 9.1 0.7 1.0 64 1 4 5 4 3 7 Subtotal Village 5 Area 64 1 4 5 4 3 7
Gross Trips 31,078 960 1,889 2,849 1,859 1,192 3,051
Internal Trips4 -2,735 -145 -285 -430 -145 -93 -238
External Trips 28,343 815 1,604 2,419 1,714 1,099 2,813 Notes:

1. Trip rates based on weighted average rates from the following land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual 12th Edition: 210 - Single Family Detached Housing, 220 - Multi-Family Housing (Low Rise), 495 – Recreational Community Center, 520 – Elementary School, and 411 – Public Park.

2. The following land use categories were included in the Single Family Detached Housing dwelling unit count: Rural Residential, Country Estates, Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential.

3. The following land use categories were included in the Multi-Family Housing (Low Rise) dwelling unit count: Medium-High Density Residential and High Density Residential.

Attachment 6
685
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 9

4. Internalization reduction based on Fehr & Peers’ MXD tool used for estimating trip generation for mixed-use developments.

Source: Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition; Fehr & Peers, 2025.

Attachment 6
686
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 10
Travel Demand Model Options
Travel demand models (TDMs) are often applied to estimate the direction and distribution of new trips generated by a proposed land use development. Selecting an appropriate model requires evaluating whether it can reasonably represent travel patterns in the project area and capture the potential travel pattern impacts of the proposed project.

Fehr & Peers explored the available TDMs for the South Placer region and compared the suitability of use for the project analysis. Below provides the detailed comparison between the model options.

City of Lincoln TDM
City of Lincoln has a travel demand model with base year of 2008 and horizon year of 2025. Although subsequent versions have incorporated some updates for past project needs, the available scenario years of this model are not appropriate for representing existing travel conditions or for developing future forecasts to support the analysis for this project.

Placer County TDM
The Placer County travel model has the base year of 2011 and the horizon year of 2035. The model also covers the entire SACOG region with a detailed focus on Placer County. The Placer One Phase 2A East Project (i.e., Placer Ranch Specific Plan in Placer County just south of Village 7) used this model for travel forecast analysis by updating the model with needed edits to reflect planned land development and transportation network improvements in the model area expected to occur over an approximate 20-year horizon. This model version was developed based on the review of the land use inputs for the Sunset Area Plan, particularly along the Industrial Avenue corridor as well as the land use inputs in northwest Rocklin.

Based on the review of the model land use and roadway network of the study area for this project, this model version requires additional effort and edits to the model inputs in the study area to ensure the reasonableness of development in the area.

SPRTA 2023 Model
The South Placer Regional Transportation Agency (SPRTA) model2 was originally developed in the early 2000’s under direction from the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA) for use of initial nexus study for SPRTA impact fee program. The model was then updated in 2007, 2009, 2014, 2021, and 2023 for use in updates of the SPRTA fees. The model land use and network cover the entire SACOG region with a detailed focus on the southwest portion of the county.

The current SPRTA 2023 model’s base year is 2019, and its horizon year is 2040. According to the SPRTA Model Development Report (November 2023),3 the 2040 model incorporates the developments of Village 1, 5, and 7 in the City of Lincoln. The review of the model indicates that this model also requires some refinement for Lincoln Village 7 and relevant adjacent village projects, but the land use growth assumptions are closer to the proposed development in the area compared to the Placer County model above. Additionally, the review also shows that SPRTA 2023 model has 2 SPRTA Model files can be acquired from https://www.pctpa.net/sprta-model 3 https://www.pctpa.net/files/e6a3844ef/SPRTA+Model+Development+Report_Nov2023.pdf Attachment 6
687
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 11
more reasonably forseeable land use growth assumptions for City of Lincoln, Sunset area, and other adjacent subareas that may impact the background traffic of the study area for this project.4 Comparison Summary and Recommendation
Table 1 summarizes the comparison findings.

Table 1: Travel Demand Model Comparison Summary
City of Lincoln TDM Placer County TDM SPRTA TDM
Model Version Unknown 1
Model most recently refined
for Placer One Phase 2A
East Project
Off-the-shelf
SPRTA 2021 Model
Model Version Update
Year NA 2025 2023
Base Year 20082 2011 2019
Horizon Year 2025 2035 2040
Model Refinement for
Village 7B is Needed3 Yes Yes Yes
Model Refinement for
Relevant Village
Projects is Needed4
Yes Yes Yes
Model Refinement for
Lincoln City Growth5 is
Needed
Yes Yes No
Notes:

1. No detailed information about the model version is currently available.

2. Subsequent model versions may exist to incorporate some updates for past project needs to represent more recent scenarios than the Year 2008.

3. Model refinement for Village 7B project includes land use input and network edits to reflect project land use and roadway structure.

4. Model refinement for relevant village projects include adjustments to model land use and network to reflect reasonable development situation for Lincoln Village 1-7 Specific Plan projects.

5. Model refinement for Lincoln City land use growth includes adjustments to model land use to reflect the reasonable land use in the horizon year model scenario.

Source: Fehr & Peers.

Based on our investigation of the available TDMs, we recommend using the SPRTA model for use on the Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment. The SPRTA model has the most up-to-date base year and a reasonable horizon year. While it does need some refinement, it more closely reflects anticipated land use growth and roadway network improvements in the City of Lincoln than the other two models reviewed.
4 Notwithstanding the above, Fehr & Peers has heard concerns expressed by some agency staff that the model land use growth in certain geographic areas may not be precise at the TAZ level. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding the amount of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) assumed.

Attachment 6
688
Village 7 Specific Plan Amendment | 12
Project Trip Distribution
The expected project trip distribution is developed based on travel demand modeling using the SPRTA 2023 model, according to the travel demand model evaluation above. The SPRTA model land use and roadway network were edited for the project and relevant areas for both existing (2025) and cumulative year scenarios. The land use edits for the project include translating the project land use inputs into model land use categories and summarizing the land use information at the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) level. The land use edits for relevant areas include reviews and refinements of the Village 5 area, Sunset Boulevard area for Placer One Phase 2A East Project, and relevant traffic loading areas to the project area. The roadway network edits include adjusting the roadways in the project area to reflect the project proposal and refining the roadways in the areas relevant to traffic loading in the project area.

The trips from and to the project area are estimated from the Cumulative Plus Project scenario of the edited SPRTA model. The trip distribution percentages are indicated in Figure 3. The trip distribution percentages do not include internal trips within the project area.

Attachment 6
689
,
Separate Proposed
Annexation Area
3D SOUTH

SORRENTO

LINCOLN

CROSSING

AUBURN RAVINE

NORTH INGRAM SLOUGH

INGRAM SLOUGH

SOUTH INGRAM SLOUGH

MOORE ROAD

SHALLUS BOULEVARD

FERRARI RANCH ROAD

LIBERTY PARKWAY

MOORE ROAD

MOORE ROAD
VLDR

7.6 Ac
VLDR

25.1 Ac
VMDR

11.3 Ac
VMDR

6.3 Ac
VMU

4.9 Ac
VPR

10.4 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

4.0 Ac
VPR

5.1 Ac
VHDR

12.3 Ac
VLDR

40.9 Ac
VLDR

27.4 Ac
VLDR

14.0 Ac
VLDR

5.9 Ac
VMDR

18.6 Ac VMDR

12.3 Ac
VMDR

57.6 Ac
VPR

2.6 Ac
VPR

2.9 Ac
ES

16.6 Ac
VHDR

19.1 Ac
VLDR

12.4 Ac
VLDR

11.6 Ac
VMDR

12.1 Ac
VPR

3.8 Ac
VPR

1.6 Ac
VMDR

9.4 Ac
VOS

13.1 Ac
VOS

2.8 Ac
VOS
120.4 Ac
VCE

2.4 Ac
VLDR

6.4 Ac
VLDR

4.4 Ac VMHDR

14.4 Ac
VMU

4.1 Ac
VOS

10.8 Ac
VOS

0.9 Ac
VPR

5.3 Ac
VMDR

17.9 Ac VLDR

6.6 Ac
VMDR

8.0 Ac
VLDR

4.0 Ac VMHDR

10.6 Ac
VMHDR

12.5 Ac
VMDR

5.0 Ac
VLDR

3.7 Ac
VOS

7.3 Ac
VMDR

3.1 Ac
VMHDR

3.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

2.6 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.7 Ac
MP

0.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.5 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP
LP 0.7 Ac

0.3 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
MP

1.8 Ac
LP

0.6 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

1.4 Ac
LP

0.4 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
MP

0.8 Ac
MP

2.9 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

0.7 Ac
LP

0.8 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.5 Ac
LP

0.3 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
LP

4.0 Ac
LP

2.0 Ac
LP

1.0 Ac
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP
MP

MP MP MP
MP

MP MP MP
Document Path: P:\18484\PLN\Applications\_2025_Scheiber_SP & GDP Revisions\FIGURES\CAD_GIS_Files\SP_Figure 4-1 Land Use Plan.mxd SP Figure 4-1: Land Use Plan
I
Legend
VOS - Open Space Preserve or Trail Corridor
VPR - Parks and Recreation
VOS/LP - Linear Parkways
VOS/MP - Major Paseos
VHDR - High Density Residential
VMHDR - Medium High Density Residential
VMDR - Medium Density Residential
VLDR - Low Density Residential
VCE - Country Estates
VMU - Neighborhood Commercial
ES - Elementary School
ROW - Major ROW
Bridge Spans
C:\fpbox\Box\-Projects\RS-Projects\2025 Projects\4413.00_Lincoln_Village_7\Graphics\AI Cumulative Year Project Trip Distributions
FIGURE 3
7%
4%
2%
2%
30%
9%
8%
3%
4% 1%
2%
5%
11%
6%
3%
3%
7%
4%
2%
2%
30%
9%
8%
3%
4% 1%
2%
5%
11%
6%
3%
3%
6%
5%
2%
3%
34%
9%
7%
3%
3% 1%
2%
3%
9%
7%
3%
3%
6%
5%
2%
3%
34%
9%
7%
3%
3% 1%
2%
3%
9%
7%
3%
3%
1 Study Instersection IN% OUT% Project Trip Percentage Project Site 1 2
3 4 8 13 15
6 7
5 9 10
11 12 16
17 18
19 14
65 Lincoln Blvd
Moore Rd
Ferrari
Ranch Rd
Liberty Pkwy
Moore Rd
Joiner Pkwy
Old Nelson Ln
Fiddyment Rd
Nelson Ln
Mavis Ave
Rachel Ave
Ruth Ave
Ferrari Ranch Rd
Torino Way
Lincoln Blvd
Moore Rd
Ferrari
Ranch Rd
Liberty Pkwy
Moore Rd
Joiner Pkwy
Old Nelson Ln
Fiddyment Rd
Nelson Ln
Mavis Ave
Rachel Ave
Ruth Ave
Ferrari Ranch Rd
Torino Way
Caledon Cir
Sorrento PkwySorrento PkwySorrento Pkwy
Attachment 6
690
P
Appendix C. Count Data
Attachment 6
691
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT: A31524
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 2 2 12:00 9 7
0:15 0 5 12:15 12 21
0:30 2 1 12:30 16 25
0:45 1 5 1 9 14 12:45 21 58 12 65 123
1:00 2 1 13:00 25 20
1:15 1 3 13:15 20 18
1:30 1 0 13:30 19 19
1:45 1 5 1 5 10 13:45 17 81 9 66 147
2:00 2 0 14:00 20 25
2:15 1 1 14:15 15 20
2:30 3 2 14:30 19 20
2:45 3 9 1 4 13 14:45 36 90 26 91 181
3:00 2 0 15:00 30 24
3:15 0 1 15:15 34 20
3:30 2 0 15:30 28 41
3:45 4 8 0 1 9 15:45 27 119 33 118 237
4:00 0 0 16:00 23 33
4:15 0 3 16:15 27 35
4:30 4 2 16:30 26 33
4:45 5 9 11 16 25 16:45 22 98 33 134 232
5:00 5 12 17:00 35 35
5:15 13 11 17:15 30 29
5:30 16 22 17:30 25 25
5:45 16 50 17 62 112 17:45 17 107 24 113 220
6:00 12 24 18:00 22 20
6:15 21 22 18:15 17 23
6:30 29 26 18:30 13 21
6:45 33 95 29 101 196 18:45 12 64 12 76 140
7:00 28 28 19:00 19 18
7:15 32 28 19:15 23 13
7:30 28 19 19:30 9 10
7:45 27 115 23 98 213 19:45 13 64 4 45 109
8:00 34 22 20:00 10 13
8:15 25 22 20:15 4 17
8:30 18 15 20:30 8 19
8:45 18 95 10 69 164 20:45 7 29 12 61 90
9:00 16 10 21:00 7 8
9:15 16 11 21:15 5 9
9:30 12 7 21:30 5 9
9:45 23 67 21 49 116 21:45 8 25 4 30 55
10:00 16 11 22:00 7 7
10:15 9 12 22:15 4 6
10:30 14 19 22:30 4 11
10:45 11 50 17 59 109 22:45 1 16 12 36 52
11:00 15 18 23:00 1 7
11:15 18 14 23:15 6 5
11:30 16 11 23:30 14 4
11:45 14 63 23 66 129 23:45 5 26 1 17 43
Total Vol. 571 539 1110 777 852 1629
NB SB Combined
1348 1391 2739
Split % 51.4% 48.6% 40.5% 47.7% 52.3% 59.5%
Peak Hour 6:30 6:30 6:30 14:45 15:30 15:30
Volume 122 111 233 128 142 247
P.H.F. 0.92 0.96 0.94 0.89 0.87 0.89
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
Volumes for: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 SC5421
DAY 1
Daily Totals
AM PM
Lincoln
ADT1 Nelson Ln north of Moore Rd.

Attachment 6
692
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT:

Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 2 2 12:00 22 12
0:15 3 0 12:15 19 21
0:30 1 1 12:30 11 20
0:45 1 7 0 3 10 12:45 23 75 19 72 147
1:00 2 0 13:00 17 18
1:15 2 2 13:15 17 14
1:30 1 3 13:30 28 14
1:45 1 6 0 5 11 13:45 20 82 21 67 149
2:00 1 2 14:00 25 20
2:15 3 1 14:15 18 19
2:30 2 3 14:30 22 30
2:45 3 9 2 8 17 14:45 19 84 22 91 175
3:00 3 1 15:00 24 21
3:15 1 0 15:15 26 29
3:30 2 1 15:30 32 34
3:45 1 7 0 2 9 15:45 27 109 27 111 220
4:00 1 0 16:00 23 37
4:15 1 1 16:15 27 43
4:30 2 2 16:30 26 40
4:45 6 10 6 9 19 16:45 11 87 32 152 239
5:00 11 13 17:00 21 31
5:15 16 10 17:15 18 36
5:30 11 16 17:30 11 30
5:45 18 56 20 59 115 17:45 24 74 21 118 192
6:00 20 23 18:00 11 27
6:15 20 20 18:15 20 17
6:30 27 40 18:30 17 12
6:45 27 94 36 119 213 18:45 16 64 11 67 131
7:00 26 16 19:00 10 13
7:15 23 19 19:15 13 11
7:30 24 20 19:30 13 20
7:45 25 98 24 79 177 19:45 13 49 8 52 101
8:00 20 24 20:00 6 7
8:15 19 25 20:15 9 3
8:30 14 16 20:30 14 19
8:45 16 69 12 77 146 20:45 12 41 19 48 89
9:00 15 15 21:00 10 12
9:15 17 15 21:15 7 10
9:30 15 11 21:30 11 10
9:45 16 63 7 48 111 21:45 11 39 5 37 76
10:00 9 11 22:00 11 8
10:15 17 16 22:15 6 5
10:30 17 11 22:30 5 7
10:45 18 61 12 50 111 22:45 8 30 7 27 57
11:00 11 16 23:00 8 2
11:15 16 7 23:15 6 1
11:30 17 23 23:30 10 3
11:45 15 59 19 65 124 23:45 3 27 1 7 34
Total Vol. 539 524 1063 761 849 1610
NB SB Combined
1300 1373 2673
Split % 50.7% 49.3% 39.8% 47.3% 52.7% 60.2%
Peak Hour 6:30 6:00 6:30 15:00 16:00 15:30
Volume 103 119 214 109 152 250
P.H.F. 0.95 0.74 0.80 0.85 0.88 0.89
Volumes for: Thursday, May 29, 2025 Lincoln SC5421
ADT1 Nelson Ln north of Moore Rd.

Daily Totals
AM PM
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
DAY 2
Attachment 6
693
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT: A31524
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 3 2 12:00 10 11
0:15 3 0 12:15 13 3
0:30 0 0 12:30 21 7
0:45 1 7 1 3 10 12:45 14 58 12 33 91
1:00 0 1 13:00 21 11
1:15 1 0 13:15 12 14
1:30 0 0 13:30 14 13
1:45 1 2 0 1 3 13:45 9 56 10 48 104
2:00 0 1 14:00 5 10
2:15 0 0 14:15 12 13
2:30 0 0 14:30 10 5
2:45 0 0 2 3 3 14:45 17 44 14 42 86
3:00 0 0 15:00 10 5
3:15 0 1 15:15 16 16
3:30 1 0 15:30 10 8
3:45 0 1 1 2 3 15:45 16 52 16 45 97
4:00 1 0 16:00 17 13
4:15 0 0 16:15 21 18
4:30 0 2 16:30 29 6
4:45 5 6 2 4 10 16:45 21 88 7 44 132
5:00 5 1 17:00 26 21
5:15 2 3 17:15 23 15
5:30 4 6 17:30 22 11
5:45 7 18 5 15 33 17:45 16 87 12 59 146
6:00 4 6 18:00 13 10
6:15 3 6 18:15 11 8
6:30 2 8 18:30 12 7
6:45 15 24 9 29 53 18:45 5 41 3 28 69
7:00 7 18 19:00 8 6
7:15 10 18 19:15 4 4
7:30 13 19 19:30 6 0
7:45 15 45 11 66 111 19:45 5 23 9 19 42
8:00 15 16 20:00 7 6
8:15 8 27 20:15 5 8
8:30 7 10 20:30 2 6
8:45 15 45 12 65 110 20:45 8 22 2 22 44
9:00 9 9 21:00 10 3
9:15 13 11 21:15 10 4
9:30 9 8 21:30 5 4
9:45 12 43 8 36 79 21:45 3 28 1 12 40
10:00 7 6 22:00 3 2
10:15 15 8 22:15 3 2
10:30 8 6 22:30 2 1
10:45 8 38 8 28 66 22:45 0 8 4 9 17
11:00 12 16 23:00 4 1
11:15 15 9 23:15 2 1
11:30 9 11 23:30 2 1
11:45 15 51 11 47 98 23:45 0 8 0 3 11
Total Vol. 280 299 579 515 364 879
EB WB Combined
795 663 1458
Split % 48.4% 51.6% 39.7% 58.6% 41.4% 60.3%
Peak Hour 11:45 7:30 7:30 16:30 17:00 16:15
Volume 59 73 124 99 59 149
P.H.F. 0.70 0.68 0.89 0.85 0.70 0.79
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
Volumes for: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 SC5421
DAY 1
Daily Totals
AM PM
Lincoln
ADT2 Moore Rd east of Nelson Ln.

Attachment 6
694
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT:

Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 2 1 12:00 9 18
0:15 0 0 12:15 11 8
0:30 1 0 12:30 8 13
0:45 2 5 0 1 6 12:45 12 40 14 53 93
1:00 0 1 13:00 10 11
1:15 1 1 13:15 11 11
1:30 1 0 13:30 13 16
1:45 1 3 0 2 5 13:45 16 50 13 51 101
2:00 0 1 14:00 12 13
2:15 1 2 14:15 15 13
2:30 0 0 14:30 14 13
2:45 0 1 0 3 4 14:45 16 57 15 54 111
3:00 0 0 15:00 14 12
3:15 1 0 15:15 19 7
3:30 0 0 15:30 12 13
3:45 1 2 0 0 2 15:45 23 68 12 44 112
4:00 0 1 16:00 29 14
4:15 2 1 16:15 17 21
4:30 0 2 16:30 23 21
4:45 0 2 1 5 7 16:45 14 83 6 62 145
5:00 2 3 17:00 29 12
5:15 3 1 17:15 19 6
5:30 2 4 17:30 17 7
5:45 6 13 4 12 25 17:45 17 82 12 37 119
6:00 4 5 18:00 23 9
6:15 6 7 18:15 8 7
6:30 10 5 18:30 10 10
6:45 4 24 17 34 58 18:45 13 54 3 29 83
7:00 6 14 19:00 9 8
7:15 8 18 19:15 8 5
7:30 12 12 19:30 7 5
7:45 13 39 15 59 98 19:45 5 29 4 22 51
8:00 10 8 20:00 8 1
8:15 10 12 20:15 8 7
8:30 8 7 20:30 11 8
8:45 13 41 7 34 75 20:45 13 40 3 19 59
9:00 6 4 21:00 6 7
9:15 7 9 21:15 2 4
9:30 4 6 21:30 4 5
9:45 6 23 5 24 47 21:45 6 18 2 18 36
10:00 12 7 22:00 5 1
10:15 10 13 22:15 2 2
10:30 16 7 22:30 5 1
10:45 7 45 15 42 87 22:45 2 14 3 7 21
11:00 12 6 23:00 3 2
11:15 12 6 23:15 3 2
11:30 9 11 23:30 0 1
11:45 11 44 13 36 80 23:45 2 8 0 5 13
Total Vol. 242 252 494 543 401 944
EB WB Combined
785 653 1438
Split % 49.0% 51.0% 34.4% 57.5% 42.5% 65.6%
Peak Hour 10:30 6:45 7:00 15:45 15:45 15:45
Volume 47 61 98 92 68 160
P.H.F. 0.73 0.85 0.88 0.79 0.81 0.91
Volumes for: Thursday, May 29, 2025 Lincoln SC5421
ADT2 Moore Rd east of Nelson Ln.

Daily Totals
AM PM
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
DAY 2
Attachment 6
695
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT: A31524
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 7 1 12:00 10 7
0:15 3 1 12:15 17 5
0:30 1 2 12:30 16 10
0:45 0 11 1 5 16 12:45 13 56 10 32 88
1:00 0 0 13:00 20 11
1:15 1 0 13:15 14 10
1:30 0 0 13:30 16 12
1:45 1 2 0 0 2 13:45 8 58 9 42 100
2:00 0 0 14:00 11 10
2:15 0 0 14:15 18 15
2:30 0 0 14:30 18 11
2:45 0 0 1 1 1 14:45 14 61 17 53 114
3:00 0 0 15:00 16 16
3:15 0 1 15:15 22 14
3:30 2 0 15:30 21 17
3:45 0 2 0 1 3 15:45 25 84 14 61 145
4:00 2 1 16:00 26 22
4:15 0 1 16:15 25 24
4:30 0 2 16:30 22 21
4:45 5 7 0 4 11 16:45 24 97 12 79 176
5:00 1 1 17:00 27 18
5:15 5 1 17:15 22 14
5:30 8 5 17:30 17 11
5:45 6 20 3 10 30 17:45 19 85 14 57 142
6:00 5 8 18:00 17 11
6:15 2 7 18:15 11 6
6:30 7 7 18:30 20 8
6:45 4 18 6 28 46 18:45 13 61 12 37 98
7:00 9 9 19:00 9 11
7:15 8 11 19:15 7 7
7:30 21 14 19:30 4 9
7:45 16 54 12 46 100 19:45 3 23 9 36 59
8:00 22 11 20:00 5 13
8:15 15 18 20:15 8 6
8:30 10 9 20:30 6 7
8:45 14 61 6 44 105 20:45 9 28 5 31 59
9:00 7 6 21:00 11 9
9:15 9 10 21:15 11 11
9:30 9 5 21:30 4 7
9:45 13 38 7 28 66 21:45 1 27 3 30 57
10:00 10 8 22:00 1 1
10:15 13 7 22:15 3 1
10:30 9 6 22:30 2 4
10:45 9 41 9 30 71 22:45 0 6 3 9 15
11:00 8 7 23:00 5 5
11:15 12 8 23:15 1 1
11:30 14 9 23:30 2 1
11:45 10 44 8 32 76 23:45 1 9 2 9 18
Total Vol. 298 229 527 595 476 1071
EB WB Combined
893 705 1598
Split % 56.5% 43.5% 33.0% 55.6% 44.4% 67.0%
Peak Hour 7:30 7:30 7:30 15:45 15:45 15:45
Volume 74 55 129 98 81 179
P.H.F. 0.84 0.76 0.92 0.94 0.84 0.91
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
Volumes for: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 SC5421
DAY 1
Daily Totals
AM PM
Lincoln
ADT3 Sorrento Pkwy east of Moore Rd.

Attachment 6
696
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT:

Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period EB WB PM Period EB WB
0:00 2 1 12:00 16 21
0:15 0 1 12:15 11 12
0:30 1 0 12:30 9 10
0:45 1 4 1 3 7 12:45 13 49 12 55 104
1:00 0 1 13:00 14 18
1:15 0 0 13:15 15 7
1:30 1 0 13:30 15 13
1:45 1 2 1 2 4 13:45 14 58 17 55 113
2:00 0 2 14:00 15 12
2:15 1 0 14:15 24 14
2:30 0 0 14:30 19 13
2:45 0 1 0 2 3 14:45 17 75 19 58 133
3:00 0 0 15:00 17 18
3:15 1 0 15:15 19 17
3:30 1 0 15:30 19 14
3:45 1 3 0 0 3 15:45 27 82 17 66 148
4:00 1 0 16:00 29 20
4:15 2 2 16:15 27 23
4:30 2 4 16:30 23 20
4:45 0 5 1 7 12 16:45 24 103 13 76 179
5:00 4 5 17:00 30 18
5:15 4 1 17:15 26 16
5:30 4 3 17:30 18 11
5:45 7 19 5 14 33 17:45 18 92 14 59 151
6:00 4 5 18:00 23 11
6:15 7 8 18:15 12 12
6:30 6 8 18:30 13 16
6:45 2 19 12 33 52 18:45 13 61 5 44 105
7:00 7 12 19:00 10 8
7:15 9 12 19:15 7 12
7:30 25 16 19:30 13 7
7:45 28 69 13 53 122 19:45 8 38 6 33 71
8:00 25 8 20:00 12 9
8:15 17 19 20:15 7 8
8:30 7 10 20:30 12 14
8:45 16 65 6 43 108 20:45 9 40 3 34 74
9:00 7 9 21:00 11 10
9:15 7 8 21:15 3 7
9:30 7 6 21:30 6 5
9:45 4 25 2 25 50 21:45 5 25 2 24 49
10:00 9 9 22:00 5 1
10:15 15 12 22:15 7 5
10:30 17 11 22:30 4 1
10:45 11 52 12 44 96 22:45 3 19 5 12 31
11:00 12 4 23:00 3 2
11:15 15 8 23:15 4 4
11:30 19 10 23:30 0 1
11:45 10 56 11 33 89 23:45 1 8 0 7 15
Total Vol. 320 259 579 650 523 1173
EB WB Combined
970 782 1752
Split % 55.3% 44.7% 33.0% 55.4% 44.6% 67.0%
Peak Hour 7:30 7:30 7:30 15:45 15:45 15:45
Volume 95 56 151 106 80 186
P.H.F. 0.85 0.74 0.92 0.91 0.87 0.93
Volumes for: Thursday, May 29, 2025 Lincoln SC5421
ADT3 Sorrento Pkwy east of Moore Rd.

Daily Totals
AM PM
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
DAY 2
Attachment 6
697
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT: A31524
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 4 10 12:00 42 34
0:15 4 6 12:15 28 48
0:30 1 3 12:30 34 37
0:45 3 12 1 20 32 12:45 36 140 32 151 291
1:00 4 2 13:00 39 52
1:15 4 1 13:15 38 48
1:30 0 2 13:30 41 39
1:45 2 10 0 5 15 13:45 44 162 39 178 340
2:00 0 0 14:00 40 37
2:15 1 2 14:15 47 59
2:30 2 1 14:30 39 65
2:45 0 3 0 3 6 14:45 76 202 46 207 409
3:00 0 0 15:00 72 61
3:15 1 2 15:15 67 61
3:30 2 4 15:30 86 52
3:45 0 3 5 11 14 15:45 94 319 42 216 535
4:00 0 0 16:00 66 54
4:15 2 5 16:15 65 51
4:30 3 6 16:30 64 70
4:45 0 5 14 25 30 16:45 59 254 52 227 481
5:00 2 15 17:00 75 71
5:15 3 20 17:15 68 58
5:30 2 20 17:30 87 73
5:45 6 13 33 88 101 17:45 65 295 45 247 542
6:00 10 30 18:00 59 47
6:15 11 35 18:15 54 48
6:30 15 31 18:30 45 49
6:45 19 55 45 141 196 18:45 52 210 38 182 392
7:00 25 40 19:00 49 45
7:15 16 63 19:15 40 29
7:30 24 111 19:30 38 21
7:45 36 101 126 340 441 19:45 44 171 22 117 288
8:00 75 92 20:00 40 12
8:15 68 68 20:15 35 29
8:30 40 37 20:30 27 21
8:45 33 216 48 245 461 20:45 23 125 20 82 207
9:00 25 31 21:00 49 25
9:15 26 49 21:15 36 19
9:30 27 47 21:30 26 20
9:45 39 117 32 159 276 21:45 22 133 4 68 201
10:00 31 33 22:00 11 7
10:15 33 30 22:15 7 7
10:30 27 41 22:30 13 2
10:45 23 114 37 141 255 22:45 6 37 1 17 54
11:00 36 35 23:00 12 9
11:15 27 37 23:15 5 1
11:30 36 45 23:30 5 2
11:45 29 128 24 141 269 23:45 8 30 2 14 44
Total Vol. 777 1319 2096 2078 1706 3784
NB SB Combined
2855 3025 5880
Split % 37.1% 62.9% 35.6% 54.9% 45.1% 64.4%
Peak Hour 7:45 7:30 7:30 15:00 16:45 16:45
Volume 219 397 600 319 254 543
P.H.F. 0.73 0.79 0.90 0.85 0.87 0.85
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
Volumes for: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 SC5421
DAY 1
Daily Totals
AM PM
Lincoln
ADT4 Sorrento Pkwy north of Ferrari Ranch Rd.

Attachment 6
698
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT:

Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 5 2 12:00 63 45
0:15 4 1 12:15 39 39
0:30 2 2 12:30 38 40
0:45 1 12 0 5 17 12:45 37 177 38 162 339
1:00 3 2 13:00 40 36
1:15 1 0 13:15 42 55
1:30 1 0 13:30 54 33
1:45 2 7 0 2 9 13:45 46 182 43 167 349
2:00 4 1 14:00 45 42
2:15 0 0 14:15 48 73
2:30 0 0 14:30 42 70
2:45 1 5 3 4 9 14:45 79 214 46 231 445
3:00 0 2 15:00 56 49
3:15 1 1 15:15 69 38
3:30 1 4 15:30 69 52
3:45 1 3 3 10 13 15:45 69 263 55 194 457
4:00 0 4 16:00 72 53
4:15 3 6 16:15 60 54
4:30 4 8 16:30 70 57
4:45 4 11 11 29 40 16:45 71 273 57 221 494
5:00 16 10 17:00 71 62
5:15 3 16 17:15 65 61
5:30 5 19 17:30 55 52
5:45 5 29 41 86 115 17:45 64 255 58 233 488
6:00 8 36 18:00 68 55
6:15 15 21 18:15 56 38
6:30 10 45 18:30 50 44
6:45 18 51 45 147 198 18:45 45 219 45 182 401
7:00 24 41 19:00 57 39
7:15 21 54 19:15 44 27
7:30 19 118 19:30 45 36
7:45 48 112 132 345 457 19:45 36 182 31 133 315
8:00 63 95 20:00 46 38
8:15 55 57 20:15 32 22
8:30 44 30 20:30 43 28
8:45 30 192 53 235 427 20:45 19 140 30 118 258
9:00 35 39 21:00 35 20
9:15 18 30 21:15 26 9
9:30 26 37 21:30 31 16
9:45 19 98 30 136 234 21:45 22 114 9 54 168
10:00 30 41 22:00 24 11
10:15 35 49 22:15 17 8
10:30 37 46 22:30 13 10
10:45 33 135 37 173 308 22:45 14 68 4 33 101
11:00 35 43 23:00 10 7
11:15 36 45 23:15 11 7
11:30 43 49 23:30 9 3
11:45 41 155 37 174 329 23:45 5 35 0 17 52
Total Vol. 810 1346 2156 2122 1745 3867
NB SB Combined
2932 3091 6023
Split % 37.6% 62.4% 35.8% 54.9% 45.1% 64.2%
Peak Hour 7:45 7:30 7:30 15:15 14:15 16:30
Volume 210 402 587 279 238 514
P.H.F. 0.83 0.76 0.82 0.97 0.82 0.97
Daily Totals
AM PM
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
DAY 2
Volumes for: Thursday, May 29, 2025 Lincoln SC5421
ADT4 Sorrento Pkwy north of Ferrari Ranch Rd.

Attachment 6
699
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT: A31524
Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 18 10 12:00 116 99
0:15 5 4 12:15 145 115
0:30 8 6 12:30 138 106
0:45 13 44 5 25 69 12:45 139 538 120 440 978
1:00 11 2 13:00 120 120
1:15 3 4 13:15 113 105
1:30 6 3 13:30 134 101
1:45 6 26 5 14 40 13:45 136 503 101 427 930
2:00 6 4 14:00 122 102
2:15 6 4 14:15 150 125
2:30 5 4 14:30 151 111
2:45 3 20 3 15 35 14:45 186 609 146 484 1093
3:00 2 5 15:00 149 125
3:15 0 12 15:15 167 115
3:30 6 15 15:30 174 132
3:45 7 15 11 43 58 15:45 165 655 138 510 1165
4:00 1 16 16:00 159 149
4:15 3 13 16:15 198 120
4:30 10 20 16:30 208 123
4:45 22 36 15 64 100 16:45 182 747 156 548 1295
5:00 16 33 17:00 192 150
5:15 23 22 17:15 200 153
5:30 38 49 17:30 191 103
5:45 38 115 50 154 269 17:45 153 736 132 538 1274
6:00 37 54 18:00 145 139
6:15 41 55 18:15 168 135
6:30 67 75 18:30 143 108
6:45 74 219 79 263 482 18:45 130 586 128 510 1096
7:00 82 85 19:00 111 125
7:15 79 79 19:15 123 90
7:30 115 109 19:30 88 102
7:45 177 453 131 404 857 19:45 98 420 74 391 811
8:00 157 139 20:00 96 74
8:15 126 127 20:15 108 88
8:30 122 91 20:30 67 81
8:45 122 527 82 439 966 20:45 75 346 81 324 670
9:00 98 76 21:00 76 54
9:15 84 77 21:15 58 65
9:30 95 91 21:30 58 35
9:45 87 364 91 335 699 21:45 38 230 30 184 414
10:00 107 81 22:00 42 27
10:15 119 80 22:15 34 23
10:30 122 108 22:30 27 26
10:45 115 463 103 372 835 22:45 27 130 17 93 223
11:00 135 104 23:00 26 29
11:15 117 99 23:15 24 19
11:30 138 103 23:30 12 6
11:45 118 508 105 411 919 23:45 17 79 9 63 142
Total Vol. 2790 2539 5329 5579 4512 10091
NB SB Combined
8369 7051 15420
Split % 52.4% 47.6% 34.6% 55.3% 44.7% 65.4%
Peak Hour 7:45 7:30 7:30 16:30 16:30 16:30
Volume 582 506 1081 782 582 1364
P.H.F. 0.82 0.91 0.88 0.94 0.93 0.97
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
Volumes for: Wednesday, May 28, 2025 SC5421
DAY 1
Daily Totals
AM PM
Lincoln
ADT27 Ferrari Ranch Rd north of Groveland Ln.

Attachment 6
700
Average Daily Traffic Volumes
Prepared by: Field Data Services of Arizona, Inc.

CITY: PROJECT:

Prepared by AimTD LLC tel. 714 253 7888
AM Period NB SB PM Period NB SB
0:00 7 14 12:00 128 116
0:15 11 12 12:15 137 110
0:30 8 1 12:30 158 122
0:45 4 30 3 30 60 12:45 126 549 118 466 1015
1:00 11 11 13:00 134 144
1:15 7 3 13:15 143 116
1:30 4 1 13:30 126 124
1:45 5 27 4 19 46 13:45 127 530 110 494 1024
2:00 5 2 14:00 155 104
2:15 4 6 14:15 159 104
2:30 5 6 14:30 167 112
2:45 2 16 6 20 36 14:45 152 633 126 446 1079
3:00 1 3 15:00 159 118
3:15 1 8 15:15 152 112
3:30 10 10 15:30 202 122
3:45 7 19 23 44 63 15:45 200 713 141 493 1206
4:00 0 9 16:00 152 157
4:15 5 14 16:15 195 135
4:30 8 25 16:30 157 130
4:45 20 33 25 73 106 16:45 176 680 136 558 1238
5:00 13 33 17:00 188 137
5:15 14 38 17:15 224 150
5:30 26 48 17:30 168 156
5:45 47 100 48 167 267 17:45 196 776 147 590 1366
6:00 45 52 18:00 176 139
6:15 44 72 18:15 136 102
6:30 71 70 18:30 152 124
6:45 68 228 61 255 483 18:45 120 584 103 468 1052
7:00 86 83 19:00 134 110
7:15 89 93 19:15 127 95
7:30 110 106 19:30 99 102
7:45 168 453 132 414 867 19:45 110 470 87 394 864
8:00 163 122 20:00 84 97
8:15 162 124 20:15 114 75
8:30 122 116 20:30 67 73
8:45 129 576 84 446 1022 20:45 87 352 71 316 668
9:00 96 81 21:00 78 57
9:15 97 78 21:15 64 55
9:30 119 103 21:30 57 52
9:45 112 424 95 357 781 21:45 48 247 40 204 451
10:00 109 105 22:00 37 43
10:15 97 111 22:15 32 41
10:30 135 112 22:30 46 19
10:45 128 469 94 422 891 22:45 31 146 24 127 273
11:00 116 111 23:00 30 17
11:15 121 104 23:15 22 19
11:30 140 114 23:30 24 11
11:45 141 518 126 455 973 23:45 20 96 13 60 156
Total Vol. 2893 2702 5595 5776 4616 10392
NB SB Combined
8669 7318 15987
Split % 51.7% 48.3% 35.0% 55.6% 44.4% 65.0%
Peak Hour 7:45 7:45 7:45 17:00 17:15 17:00
Volume 615 494 1109 776 592 1366
P.H.F. 0.92 0.94 0.92 0.87 0.95 0.91
Volumes for: Thursday, May 29, 2025 Lincoln SC5421
ADT27 Ferrari Ranch Rd north of Groveland Ln.

Daily Totals
AM PM
[email protected] Tell. 714 253 7888
DAY 2
Attachment 6
701
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5421
Thu, May 29, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 1
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 17 11 1 104 13 22 8 221 3 2 275 45 722 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 15 7 2 151 14 13 15 213 6 1 251 80 768 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 15 8 3 192 12 15 11 246 6 3 179 79 769 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 12 17 2 162 12 6 10 241 12 2 191 111 778 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 8 11 1 179 16 15 12 200 6 3 134 85 670 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 8 9 2 124 17 12 7 166 4 4 150 93 596 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 5 6 1 87 7 8 3 202 5 1 150 84 559 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 9 9 0 94 7 4 4 196 5 2 116 64 510 0 0 0 2 2
VOLUMES 89 78 12 1,093 98 95 70 1,685 47 18 1,446 641 5,374 0 0 0 2 2 APPROACH % 50% 44% 7% 85% 8% 7% 4% 94% 3% 1% 69% 30%
APP/DEPART 179 / 789 1,286 / 163 1,802 / 2,792 2,107 / 1,630 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 59 43 8 609 51 56 44 921 27 8 896 315 3,037 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 54% 39% 7% 85% 7% 8% 4% 93% 3% 1% 74% 26%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.887 0.817 0.943 0.918 0.976
APP/DEPART 110 / 402 716 / 86 992 / 1,538 1,219 / 1,011 0 03:00 PM 11 10 0 87 15 2 10 176 5 2 184 114 616 0 0 0 3 3 3:15 PM 7 18 1 97 15 5 9 160 11 0 193 136 652 0 0 0 0 0 3:30 PM 11 20 0 114 23 23 13 167 13 2 195 151 732 0 0 0 2 2 3:45 PM 7 25 0 78 15 6 9 225 9 1 217 161 753 0 0 0 1 1
4:00 PM 6 10 0 110 19 9 9 194 17 5 203 151 733 0 0 0 2 2 4:15 PM 5 19 0 85 16 5 8 199 26 2 228 135 728 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 9 20 1 157 21 11 10 223 19 2 223 144 840 0 0 0 2 2 4:45 PM 5 7 2 108 16 8 15 243 14 5 184 145 752 0 0 0 1 1 5:00 PM 7 15 3 99 10 8 17 233 25 0 174 159 750 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 5 13 1 109 20 1 10 197 14 3 222 172 767 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 6 6 1 93 16 6 21 200 9 3 186 116 663 0 0 1 0 1
5:45 PM 8 11 2 90 11 4 8 144 11 2 185 126 602 0 0 0 0 0 VOLUMES 87 174 11 1,227 197 88 139 2,361 173 27 2,394 1,710 8,600 0 0 1 11 12 APPROACH % 32% 64% 4% 81% 13% 6% 5% 88% 6% 1% 58% 41%
APP/DEPART 272 / 2,023 1,512 / 397 2,674 / 3,610 4,142 / 2,570 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 26 55 7 473 67 28 52 896 72 10 803 620 3,112 0 0 0 3 APPROACH % 30% 63% 8% 83% 12% 5% 5% 88% 7% 1% 56% 43%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.733 0.751 0.927 0.904 0.924
APP/DEPART 88 / 727 568 / 149 1,020 / 1,379 1,436 / 857 0 Nelson Ln

NORTH LEG
SR-65 WEST LEG EAST LEG SR-65

SOUTH LEG
Nelson Ln

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

AM PM AM
7:00 AM
PM
4:30 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Lincoln
Nelson Ln
SR-65

U-TURNS
Nelson Ln Nelson Ln SR-65 SR-65
Attachment 6
702
2,798 183 295 2,320 TOTAL 2,812
1,512 88 197 1,227 PM 2,023
1,286 95 98 1,093 AM 789
2,107 4,142 6,249
4,200 2,570 1,630
641
1,710 2,351
1,446 2,394 3,840
TOTAL
PM
AM
18 27 45
209 139
70 AM
PM
TOTAL
4,046 2,361 1,685
220 173
47 2,792 3,610 6,402
4,476 2,674 1,802
163 AM 89 78 12 179
397 PM 87 174 11 272
560 TOTAL176 252 23 451
1,284 84 118 1,082 TOTAL 1,129
568 28 67 473 PM 727
716 56 51 609 AM 402
1,219 1,436 2,655
1,868
857
1,011
315 620 935
896 803
1,699
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:00 AM
8:45 AM
8 10 18
96 52 44
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
1,817
896 921
PM 4:30 PM
3:45 PM
99 72 27
1,538 1,379 2,917
2,012 1,020
992
86 AM 59 43 8 110
149 PM 26 55 7 88
235 Total85 98 15 198
Nelson Ln
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Nelson Ln
SR-65
SR-65

ALL HOURS
Nelson Ln
Nelson Ln
SR-65
SR-65

PEAK HOUR
Lincoln
SC5421
Attachment 6
703
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Nelson Ln LOCATION #: 1
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: SR-65 CONTROL: SIGNAL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
7:00 AM 17 11 1 109 16 22 12 262 4 2 309 46 809 0
7:15 AM 17 9 2 160 15 13 15 251 8 1 284 92 866 0
7:30 AM 15 11 3 199 13 20 11 275 6 3 221 93 868 0
7:45 AM 12 18 3 169 13 6 14 272 13 2 220 131 871 0
8:00 AM 8 12 1 197 19 18 13 230 7 4 171 90 768 0
8:15 AM 8 10 2 128 17 20 8 192 5 4 178 97 667 0
8:30 AM 6 7 1 89 7 12 3 233 5 1 194 95 650 0
8:45 AM 9 13 0 102 9 5 6 247 8 2 147 74 621 0
VOLUMES 91 89 13 1,152 107 115 81 1,961 55 19 1,722 716 6,118 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 47% 46% 7% 84% 8% 8% 4% 94% 3% 1% 70% 29%
APP/DEPART 192 / 886 1,373 / 181 2,096 / 3,125 2,457 / 1,927 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 61 48 9 637 56 61 52 1,060 30 8 1,033 361 3,413 APPROACH % 52% 41% 7% 85% 7% 8% 5% 93% 3% 1% 74% 26%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.914 0.813 0.956 0.929 0.980
APP/DEPART 117 / 461 753 / 94 1,142 / 1,705 1,402 / 1,154 0 03:00 PM 12 11 0 94 16 3 11 208 6 2 206 128 694 0
3:15 PM 8 21 1 111 16 5 10 185 11 0 208 153 727 0
3:30 PM 13 25 0 117 24 25 13 191 17 2 210 172 807 0
3:45 PM 8 28 0 79 18 6 9 243 10 1 235 176 811 0
4:00 PM 7 12 0 116 20 10 11 209 17 6 222 168 795 0
4:15 PM 7 21 0 87 18 7 9 210 29 3 246 149 782 0
4:30 PM 10 22 1 160 24 12 11 237 20 2 237 159 894 0
4:45 PM 6 9 2 114 17 10 17 262 14 5 198 151 802 0
5:00 PM 8 16 3 107 10 8 17 248 26 0 188 169 798 0
5:15 PM 5 14 1 118 21 1 11 208 15 3 229 179 803 0
5:30 PM 8 8 1 99 17 8 23 211 10 3 194 120 699 0
5:45 PM 10 12 3 102 12 4 8 151 12 2 192 134 639 0
VOLUMES 98 195 12 1,302 210 97 147 2,561 184 28 2,563 1,854 9,249 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 32% 64% 4% 81% 13% 6% 5% 89% 6% 1% 58% 42%
APP/DEPART 305 / 2,196 1,608 / 421 2,892 / 3,874 4,445 / 2,758 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 28 60 7 499 71 30 55 955 74 10 852 657 3,296
APPROACH % 29% 63% 7% 83% 12% 5% 5% 88% 7% 1% 56% 43%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.720 0.768 0.926 0.925 0.922
APP/DEPART 95 / 772 599 / 154 1,084 / 1,461 1,519 / 910 0 Nelson Ln

NORTH SIDE
SR-65 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE SR-65

SOUTH SIDE
Nelson Ln

U-TURNS
Nelson Ln Nelson Ln SR-65 SR-65
AM
7:00 AM
PM
4:30 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Attachment 6
704
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Nelson Ln LOCATION #: 1
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: SR-65 CONTROL: SIGNAL
CLASS 1: NOTES: AM ▲

PASSENGER PM N
VEHICLES MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
7:00 AM 17 11 1 99 11 22 6 186 2 2 243 44 644 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 13 6 2 141 13 13 15 179 5 1 227 66 681 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 15 6 3 184 10 12 11 216 6 3 145 66 677 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 12 16 1 153 11 6 8 208 11 2 162 92 682 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 8 10 1 159 14 12 11 172 5 2 106 82 582 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM 8 8 2 118 17 7 6 146 3 4 119 89 527 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 4 5 1 84 7 6 3 175 5 1 116 71 478 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 9 4 0 86 6 3 3 160 3 2 92 53 421 0 0 0 1 1
VOLUMES 86 66 11 1,024 89 81 63 1,442 40 17 1,210 563 4,693 0 0 0 1 1 APPROACH % 53% 40% 7% 86% 7% 7% 4% 93% 3% 1% 68% 31%
APP/DEPART 163 / 692 1,194 / 146 1,545 / 2,478 1,791 / 1,377 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 57 39 7 577 45 53 40 789 24 8 777 268 2,684 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 55% 38% 7% 85% 7% 8% 5% 92% 3% 1% 74% 25%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.888 0.819 0.915 0.895 0.984
APP/DEPART 103 / 347 675 / 77 853 / 1,373 1,053 / 887 0 03:00 PM 10 9 0 80 14 1 8 150 4 2 164 101 543 0 0 0 3 3 3:15 PM 6 14 1 85 13 5 8 139 11 0 174 124 580 0 0 0 0 0 3:30 PM 9 15 0 109 21 21 13 149 11 2 179 134 663 0 0 0 2 2 3:45 PM 6 20 0 76 13 6 9 207 8 1 192 145 683 0 0 0 1 1
4:00 PM 5 7 0 102 17 8 7 178 17 4 179 134 658 0 0 0 2 2 4:15 PM 4 16 0 82 14 3 7 185 24 1 202 122 660 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM 7 19 1 151 19 10 9 207 18 2 206 130 779 0 0 0 2 2 4:45 PM 4 5 2 103 15 6 13 225 14 5 170 138 700 0 0 0 1 1 5:00 PM 6 13 3 91 10 8 17 218 24 0 158 149 697 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 5 12 1 100 19 1 9 185 13 3 211 162 721 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 5 5 1 89 15 5 19 187 8 3 177 110 624 0 0 1 0 1
5:45 PM 6 10 1 77 9 4 8 134 10 2 178 118 557 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 73 145 10 1,145 179 78 127 2,164 162 25 2,190 1,567 7,877 0 0 1 11 12 APPROACH % 32% 64% 4% 82% 13% 6% 5% 88% 7% 1% 58% 41%
APP/DEPART 228 / 1,839 1,402 / 366 2,454 / 3,330 3,793 / 2,342 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 22 49 7 445 63 25 48 835 69 10 745 579 2,900 0 0 0 3 APPROACH % 28% 63% 9% 83% 12% 5% 5% 88% 7% 1% 56% 43%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.722 0.740 0.919 0.889 0.928
APP/DEPART 78 / 676 533 / 142 952 / 1,290 1,337 / 792 0 Nelson Ln

NORTH SIDE
SR-65 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE SR-65

SOUTH SIDE
Nelson Ln
AM
7:00 AM
PM
4:30 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Nelson Ln Nelson Ln SR-65 SR-65
Attachment 6
705
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Nelson Ln LOCATION #: 1
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: SR-65 CONTROL: SIGNAL
CLASS 2: NOTES: AM ▲
2-AXLE PM N
WORK MD ◄ W E ►

VEHICLES/ OTHER S
TRUCKS OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
7:00 AM 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 16 1 0 17 1 39 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 18 0 0 10 10 46 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 1 0 6 2 1 0 19 0 0 15 5 49 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 1 1 6 1 0 0 20 1 0 17 10 57 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 1 0 10 1 2 1 15 0 0 10 1 41 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 1 0 4 0 1 1 8 0 0 19 2 36 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 13 0 0 13 7 38 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 4 0 5 0 1 0 12 1 0 8 6 37 0 0 0 1 1
VOLUMES 2 9 1 43 6 5 2 121 3 0 109 42 344 0 0 0 1 1
APPROACH % 17% 75% 8% 80% 11% 9% 2% 96% 2% 0% 72% 28%
APP/DEPART 12 / 53 54 / 9 126 / 166 152 / 116 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 1 2 1 21 5 1 0 73 2 0 59 26 191 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 25% 50% 25% 78% 19% 4% 0% 97% 3% 0% 69% 31%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.750 0.893 0.787 0.838
APP/DEPART 4 / 28 27 / 7 75 / 95 85 / 61 0
03:00 PM 1 1 0 4 1 1 2 10 0 0 11 7 38 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 1 3 0 6 2 0 1 11 0 0 14 4 42 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 1 2 0 5 2 0 0 7 0 0 11 9 37 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 1 5 0 2 1 0 0 8 1 0 20 10 48 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 1 3 0 6 2 1 1 9 0 1 16 11 51 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 3 0 3 1 1 1 11 1 1 22 6 50 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 2 0 0 6 1 1 0 10 1 0 10 8 39 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 8 0 0 8 5 28 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 1 2 0 5 0 0 0 10 1 0 10 5 34 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 1 0 6 1 0 1 6 1 0 10 9 35 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 10 1 0 7 5 26 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 1 1 1 7 2 0 0 8 1 0 3 5 29 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 10 22 1 53 15 5 8 108 7 2 142 84 457 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 30% 67% 3% 73% 21% 7% 7% 88% 6% 1% 62% 37%
APP/DEPART 33 / 114 73 / 24 123 / 162 228 / 157 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 4 4 0 19 3 2 2 34 3 0 38 27 136 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 50% 50% 0% 79% 13% 8% 5% 87% 8% 0% 58% 42%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.667 0.750 0.886 0.855 0.872
APP/DEPART 8 / 33 24 / 6 39 / 53 65 / 44 0
Nelson Ln

NORTH SIDE
SR-65 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE SR-65

SOUTH SIDE
Nelson Ln
AM
7:00 AM
PM
4:30 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Nelson Ln Nelson Ln SR-65 SR-65
Attachment 6
706
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Nelson Ln LOCATION #: 1
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: SR-65 CONTROL: SIGNAL
CLASS 3: NOTES: AM ▲
3-AXLE PM N
TRUCKS MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
7:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 11 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 4 11 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 3 13 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 4 1 1 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 2 11 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 2 11 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 28 2 1 32 12 90 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 93% 7% 2% 71% 27%
APP/DEPART 1 / 12 14 / 3 30 / 42 45 / 33 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 15 0 0 13 8 42 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 62% 38%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.250 0.625 0.750 0.656 0.808
APP/DEPART 1 / 8 5 / 0 15 / 20 21 / 14 0
03:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 4 1 9 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 0 2 1 11 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 9 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 1 4 0 7 1 3 3 26 1 0 20 11 77 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 20% 80% 0% 64% 9% 27% 10% 87% 3% 0% 65% 35%
APP/DEPART 5 / 18 11 / 2 30 / 33 31 / 24 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 11 0 0 9 1 24 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 8% 92% 0% 0% 90% 10%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.250 0.250 0.500 0.625 0.545
APP/DEPART 1 / 3 1 / 0 12 / 11 10 / 10 0
Nelson Ln

NORTH SIDE
SR-65 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE SR-65

SOUTH SIDE
Nelson Ln
AM
7:00 AM
PM
4:30 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Nelson Ln Nelson Ln SR-65 SR-65
Attachment 6
707
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Nelson Ln LOCATION #: 1
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: SR-65 CONTROL: SIGNAL
CLASS 4: NOTES: AM ▲
4 OR MORE PM N
AXLE MD ◄ W E ►

TRUCKS OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
7:00 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 14 0 0 10 0 28 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 13 1 0 14 3 34 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 8 0 0 15 3 31 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 8 0 0 8 6 25 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 9 0 0 14 2 30 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 10 0 0 6 1 20 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 16 1 29 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 21 1 0 11 2 40 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 3 0 11 3 8 5 93 2 0 94 18 237 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 50% 14% 36% 5% 93% 2% 0% 84% 16%
APP/DEPART 3 / 26 22 / 5 100 / 104 112 / 102 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 2 0 6 1 2 4 43 1 0 47 12 118 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 67% 11% 22% 8% 90% 2% 0% 80% 20%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.563 0.750 0.819 0.868
APP/DEPART 2 / 18 9 / 2 48 / 49 59 / 49 0
03:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 11 0 0 7 4 24 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 9 0 0 3 7 24 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 9 2 0 4 8 24 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 3 4 12 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 5 12 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 4 11 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 2 5 12 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 1 12 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 2 12 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 2 3 0 19 2 1 0 57 3 0 36 43 166 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 40% 60% 0% 86% 9% 5% 0% 95% 5% 0% 46% 54%
APP/DEPART 5 / 46 22 / 5 60 / 76 79 / 39 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 1 0 7 1 0 0 15 0 0 10 9 43 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 100% 0% 88% 13% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 53% 47%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.250 0.667 0.750 0.679 0.896
APP/DEPART 1 / 10 8 / 1 15 / 22 19 / 10 0
Nelson Ln

NORTH SIDE
SR-65 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE SR-65

SOUTH SIDE
Nelson Ln
AM
7:00 AM
PM
4:30 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Nelson Ln Nelson Ln SR-65 SR-65
Attachment 6
708
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Nelson Ln LOCATION #: 1
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: SR-65 CONTROL: SIGNAL
CLASS 5: NOTES: AM ▲

RV PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50%
APP/DEPART 0 / 1 1 / 0 0 / 0 2 / 2 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.250
APP/DEPART 0 / 1 0 / 0 0 / 0 1 / 0 0
03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0%
APP/DEPART 1 / 0 1 / 0 4 / 4 1 / 3 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.250
APP/DEPART 0 / 0 0 / 0 1 / 1 0 / 0 0
Nelson Ln

NORTH SIDE
SR-65 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE SR-65

SOUTH SIDE
Nelson Ln
AM
7:00 AM
PM
4:30 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Nelson Ln Nelson Ln SR-65 SR-65
Attachment 6
709
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Nelson Ln LOCATION #: 1
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: SR-65 CONTROL: SIGNAL
CLASS 6: NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
BUSES MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100%
APP/DEPART 0 / 5 1 / 0 1 / 2 5 / 0 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.000 0.250
APP/DEPART 0 / 0 0 / 0 1 / 1 0 / 0 0
03:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 5 5 16 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 33% 67% 0% 0% 50% 50%
APP/DEPART 0 / 6 3 / 0 3 / 5 10 / 5 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 8 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 20% 80%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.500 0.250 0.417 0.500
APP/DEPART 0 / 5 2 / 0 1 / 2 5 / 1 0
Nelson Ln

NORTH SIDE
SR-65 WEST SIDE EAST SIDE SR-65

SOUTH SIDE
Nelson Ln
AM
7:00 AM
PM
4:30 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Nelson Ln Nelson Ln SR-65 SR-65
Attachment 6
710
T020624
DATE: LOCATION: PROJECT #: SC5421
Thu, May 29, 25 NORTH & SOUTH: LOCATION #: 2
EAST & WEST: CONTROL: STOP ALL
NOTES: AM ▲
PM N
MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 X 0 X X X X 1 0 0 1 X 0 0 0 0
7:00 AM 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 4 1 25 3 0 57 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 3 0 24 0 0 0 0 2 1 29 4 0 63 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 4 0 32 0 0 0 0 1 6 22 4 0 69 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 1 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 4 30 2 0 70 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 3 0 23 0 0 0 0 3 4 26 2 0 61 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 3 5 23 5 0 57 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 2 0 23 0 0 0 0 1 3 18 8 0 55 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 1 1 14 2 0 38 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 13 0 200 0 0 0 0 15 25 187 30 0 470 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 6% 0% 94% 0% 0% 0% 0% 38% 63% 86% 14% 0%
APP/DEPART 213 / 0 0 / 212 40 / 215 217 / 43 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 11 0 112 0 0 0 0 6 15 107 12 0 263 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 9% 0% 91% 0% 0% 0% 0% 29% 71% 90% 10% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.854 0.000 0.750 0.902 0.939
APP/DEPART 123 / 0 0 / 122 21 / 118 119 / 23 0
03:00 PM 5 0 31 0 0 0 0 4 6 23 3 0 72 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 6 0 35 0 0 0 0 6 0 30 0 0 77 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 9 0 37 0 0 0 0 3 2 45 2 0 98 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 4 0 36 0 0 0 0 8 1 30 5 0 84 0 0 0 1 1
4:00 PM 7 0 35 0 0 0 0 11 2 34 6 0 95 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 3 0 30 0 0 0 0 6 3 49 4 0 95 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 6 0 35 0 0 0 0 7 2 48 10 0 108 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 2 0 22 0 0 0 0 2 0 30 3 0 59 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 6 0 36 0 0 0 0 14 2 32 7 0 97 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 6 0 24 0 0 0 0 7 4 40 5 0 86 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 4 0 18 0 0 0 0 7 4 29 2 0 64 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 4 0 32 0 0 0 0 5 2 28 3 0 74 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 62 0 371 0 0 0 0 80 28 418 50 0 1,010 0 0 0 1 1 APPROACH % 14% 0% 86% 0% 0% 0% 0% 74% 26% 89% 11% 0%
APP/DEPART 433 / 0 0 / 446 108 / 452 469 / 112 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 20 0 136 0 0 0 0 32 8 161 25 0 383 0 0 0 1
APPROACH % 13% 0% 87% 0% 0% 0% 0% 80% 20% 86% 13% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.929 0.000 0.769 0.806 0.887
APP/DEPART 156 / 0 0 / 169 40 / 169 187 / 45 0
Fiddyment Rd

NORTH LEG
Moore Rd WEST LEG EAST LEG Moore Rd

SOUTH LEG
Fiddyment Rd

N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL N LEG S LEG E LEG W LEG TOTAL NL SL EL WL TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

U-TURNS
Fiddyment Rd Fiddyment Rd Moore Rd Moore Rd

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Lincoln
Fiddyment Rd
Moore Rd

BICYCLE & SCOOTER CROSSINGS

AM PM AM
7:15 AM
PM
3:45 PM
ALL PED + BIKE & SCOOTER PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS
Attachment 6
711
0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0
0 0 0 0 PM 0
0 0 0 0 AM 0
217 469 686
155 112
43 0 0 0
30 50 80
TOTAL
PM
AM
187 418 605
0 0 0
AM
PM
TOTAL
95 80 15
53 28 25
215 452 667
148 108
40 212 AM 13 0 200 213
446 PM 62 0 371 433
658 TOTAL75 0 571 646
0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0
0 0 0 0 PM 0
0 0 0 0 AM 0
119 187 306
68 45 23
0 0 0
12 25 37
TOTAL
PM
AM
AM 7:15 AM
8:45 AM
107 161 268
0 0 0
#N/A
AM
PM
TOTAL
38 32
6 PM 3:45 PM
3:45 PM
23 8
15 118 169 287
61 40 21
122 AM 11 0 112 123
169 PM 20 0 136 156
291 Total31 0 248 279
Fiddyment Rd
AimTD LLC

TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
Fiddyment Rd
Moore Rd
Moore Rd

ALL HOURS
Fiddyment Rd
Fiddyment Rd
Moore Rd
Moore Rd

PEAK HOUR
Lincoln
SC5421
Attachment 6
712
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Fiddyment Rd LOCATION #: 2
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: Moore Rd CONTROL: STOP ALL
NOTES: AM ▲
PCE Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 PM N
Adjusted Factor 1 1.5 2 3 2 2 MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 X 0 X X X X 1 0 0 1 X
7:00 AM 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 5 3 28 3 0 63 0
7:15 AM 4 0 27 0 0 0 0 3 3 34 4 0 74 0
7:30 AM 4 0 35 0 0 0 0 1 7 23 4 0 73 0
7:45 AM 1 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 3 0 75 0
8:00 AM 4 0 25 0 0 0 0 4 4 30 2 0 68 0
8:15 AM 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 9 24 5 0 63 0
8:30 AM 2 0 24 0 0 0 0 1 3 19 8 0 57 0
8:45 AM 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 1 2 19 2 0 47 0
VOLUMES 14 0 214 0 0 0 0 17 35 208 31 0 518 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 6% 0% 94% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 67% 87% 13% 0%
APP/DEPART 228 / 0 0 / 243 52 / 231 238 / 45 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 12 0 121 0 0 0 0 7 19 118 13 0 289
APPROACH % 9% 0% 91% 0% 0% 0% 0% 27% 73% 90% 10% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.864 0.000 0.850 0.867 0.962
APP/DEPART 133 / 0 0 / 136 26 / 128 130 / 25 0
03:00 PM 5 0 34 0 0 0 0 5 6 25 3 0 78 0
3:15 PM 7 0 38 0 0 0 0 6 0 33 0 0 83 0
3:30 PM 11 0 42 0 0 0 0 3 3 51 2 0 112 0
3:45 PM 5 0 38 0 0 0 0 8 1 34 5 0 90 0
4:00 PM 7 0 39 0 0 0 0 11 2 35 7 0 100 0
4:15 PM 3 0 34 0 0 0 0 6 6 55 4 0 107 0
4:30 PM 6 0 37 0 0 0 0 8 2 49 10 0 111 0
4:45 PM 2 0 22 0 0 0 0 3 0 30 3 0 60 0
5:00 PM 6 0 41 0 0 0 0 17 2 34 8 0 106 0
5:15 PM 6 0 29 0 0 0 0 7 4 41 6 0 93 0
5:30 PM 4 0 19 0 0 0 0 7 4 30 2 0 66 0
5:45 PM 4 0 34 0 0 0 0 5 2 29 3 0 77 0
VOLUMES 65 0 405 0 0 0 0 84 31 443 52 0 1,079 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH % 14% 0% 86% 0% 0% 0% 0% 73% 27% 90% 10% 0%
APP/DEPART 470 / 0 0 / 474 115 / 489 495 / 117 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 21 0 147 0 0 0 0 33 11 172 26 0 407
APPROACH % 12% 0% 88% 0% 0% 0% 0% 76% 24% 87% 13% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.918 0.000 0.827 0.842 0.917
APP/DEPART 167 / 0 0 / 182 43 / 179 197 / 46 0
Fiddyment Rd

NORTH SIDE
Moore Rd WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Moore Rd

SOUTH SIDE
Fiddyment Rd
AM
7:15 AM
PM
3:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]

U-TURNS
Fiddyment Rd Fiddyment Rd Moore Rd Moore Rd
Attachment 6
713
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Fiddyment Rd LOCATION #: 2
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: Moore Rd CONTROL: STOP ALL
CLASS 1: NOTES: AM ▲

PASSENGER PM N
VEHICLES MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 X 0 X X X X 1 0 0 1 X
7:00 AM 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 3 0 22 3 0 52 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 2 0 21 0 0 0 0 1 0 24 4 0 52 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 4 0 30 0 0 0 0 1 5 21 4 0 65 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 1 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 3 27 1 0 61 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 2 0 20 0 0 0 0 2 4 22 2 0 52 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 3 1 22 5 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 2 0 22 0 0 0 0 1 3 17 8 0 53 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 2 0 31 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 11 0 183 0 0 0 0 12 16 165 29 0 416 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 6% 0% 94% 0% 0% 0% 0% 43% 57% 85% 15% 0%
APP/DEPART 194 / 0 0 / 181 28 / 195 194 / 40 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 9 0 100 0 0 0 0 4 12 94 11 0 230 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 8% 0% 92% 0% 0% 0% 0% 25% 75% 90% 10% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.801 0.000 0.667 0.938 0.885
APP/DEPART 109 / 0 0 / 106 16 / 104 105 / 20 0
03:00 PM 5 0 26 0 0 0 0 3 6 20 3 0 63 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 5 0 31 0 0 0 0 6 0 25 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 8 0 32 0 0 0 0 3 1 39 2 0 85 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 3 0 33 0 0 0 0 8 1 26 5 0 76 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 7 0 32 0 0 0 0 11 2 32 5 0 89 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 3 0 26 0 0 0 0 6 1 43 4 0 83 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 6 0 32 0 0 0 0 6 2 47 10 0 103 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 2 0 22 0 0 0 0 1 0 30 3 0 58 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 6 0 32 0 0 0 0 12 2 30 6 0 88 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 6 0 20 0 0 0 0 7 4 38 4 0 79 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 4 0 17 0 0 0 0 7 4 28 2 0 62 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 4 0 29 0 0 0 0 5 2 26 3 0 69 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 59 0 332 0 0 0 0 75 25 384 47 0 922 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 15% 0% 85% 0% 0% 0% 0% 75% 25% 89% 11% 0%
APP/DEPART 391 / 0 0 / 409 100 / 407 431 / 106 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 19 0 123 0 0 0 0 31 6 148 24 0 351 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 13% 0% 87% 0% 0% 0% 0% 84% 16% 86% 14% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.910 0.000 0.712 0.754 0.852
APP/DEPART 142 / 0 0 / 154 37 / 154 172 / 43 0
Fiddyment Rd

NORTH SIDE
Moore Rd WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Moore Rd

SOUTH SIDE
Fiddyment Rd

U-TURNS
Fiddyment Rd Fiddyment Rd Moore Rd Moore Rd
AM
7:15 AM
PM
3:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Attachment 6
714
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Fiddyment Rd LOCATION #: 2
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: Moore Rd CONTROL: STOP ALL
CLASS 2: NOTES: AM ▲
2-AXLE PM N
WORK MD ◄ W E ►

VEHICLES/ OTHER S
TRUCKS OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 X 0 X X X X 1 0 0 1 X
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 2 0 13 0 0 0 0 2 4 13 1 0 35 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 13% 0% 87% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 67% 93% 7% 0%
APP/DEPART 15 / 0 0 / 17 6 / 15 14 / 3 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 2 0 10 0 0 0 0 2 1 9 1 0 25 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 17% 0% 83% 0% 0% 0% 0% 67% 33% 90% 10% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.750 0.000 0.750 0.625 0.781
APP/DEPART 12 / 0 0 / 10 3 / 12 10 / 3 0
03:00 PM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 1
4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 2 0 23 0 0 0 0 4 2 26 3 0 61 0 0 0 1 1
APPROACH % 8% 0% 92% 0% 0% 0% 0% 67% 33% 87% 10% 0%
APP/DEPART 25 / 0 0 / 28 6 / 28 30 / 5 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 1 0 23 0 0 0 1
APPROACH % 10% 0% 90% 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 50% 82% 9% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.625 0.000 0.500 0.688 0.719
APP/DEPART 10 / 0 0 / 10 2 / 11 11 / 2 0
Fiddyment Rd

NORTH SIDE
Moore Rd WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Moore Rd

SOUTH SIDE
Fiddyment Rd

U-TURNS
Fiddyment Rd Fiddyment Rd Moore Rd Moore Rd
AM
7:15 AM
PM
3:45 PM

INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PREPARED BY: AimTD LLC. tel: 714 253 7888 [email protected]
Attachment 6
715
DATE: LOCATION: Lincoln PROJECT #: SC5421
5/29/25 NORTH & SOUTH: Fiddyment Rd LOCATION #: 2
THURSDAY EAST & WEST: Moore Rd CONTROL: STOP ALL
CLASS 3: NOTES: AM ▲
3-AXLE PM N
TRUCKS MD ◄ W E ►

OTHER S
OTHER ▼

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TTL LANES: 0 X 0 X X X X 1 0 0 1 X
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 33% 67% 100% 0% 0%
APP/DEPART 1 / 0 0 / 5 3 / 2 3 / 0 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 0% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.500
APP/DEPART 0 / 0 0 / 2 1 / 0 1 / 0 0
03:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
3:15 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
3:30 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
3:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VOLUMES 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0%
APP/DEPART 9 / 0 0 / 4 0 / 9 4 / 0 0

BEGIN PEAK HR
VOLUMES 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
APPROACH % 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0% 0%
PEAK HR FACTOR 0.500 0.000 0.000 0.250 0.500
APP/DEPART 2 / 0 0 / 2 0 / 2 2 / 0 0
Fiddyment Rd

NORTH SIDE
Moore Rd WEST SIDE EAST SIDE Moore Rd