waivers are granted based on information supplied by the owner that refuse in the landfill was placed below the ground water table ..
Should you have any questions or comments, you may contact MP-rcedes A. Murillo at (213) 620-5444.
DENNIS DASKER
supervising Water Resource
Control Engineer
cc: Mr. Jim Parsons, DWQ, SWRCB
~r. Fred w. Tahse, IT Corporation
[}]
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
August 30, 1988
Project No. 240827-08-01
Ms. Mercedes A. Murillo
California Regional Water Quality
Control Board, Los Angeles Region
107 South Broadway, Room 4027
Los Angeles, California 90012-4596
i_
ADDENDUM
SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST PROPOSAL
MARKET PLACE SANITARY LANDFILL
Dear Ms. Murillo:
,~f£
1 j~r c./P
As per your letter dated August 17, 1988 (copy attached), IT Corporation (IT), as consultants for and on beha 1f of our c 1 i ent, the Bixby Ranch Company, is hereby submitting to the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, a surface-water monitoring plan (Item No. 1) for the Market Place Sanitary Landfill. A work plan to identify the presence of multiple aquifers beneath the site (Item No.2) will be submitted to Board staff prior to sampling of the monitoring wells. As per your letter, Items 3 through 6 will be included in the final SWAT report.
SURFACE WATER MONITORING PLAN
The following describes the surface water monitoring plan for the Market Place Sanitary Landfill, including: a map designating the ·locations of proposed water sampling, sampling protocol, analyses, and schedule.
Sample Location
One surface water runoff sample will be collected along the northeastern boundary of the landfill where the surface runoff from precipitation onto the landfill surface drains (Figure 1). The slope of the landfill on this side is steep enough to allow for the collection of the sample. Samples which may be representative of surface runoff from the landfill cannot be collected from other areas of the 1 andfi 11 , s i nee most of the 1 andfi 11 surface area is covered with asphalt pavement.
Regional Office
17461 Derian Avenue • Suite 190 • Irvine, California 92714 • 714-261-6441 IT Corporation is a wholly owned subsidiary of International Technology Corporation I 1
INTER~.<:.~IONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Ms. Mercedes Murillo
August 30, 1988
Sampling Protocol
One set of surface water runoff samples will be collected from the north eastern boundary of the landfill. One sample will be collected from the sample location shown on Figure 1 (MPSF-1). The sample will be collected by installing a catch basin, approximately 1 by 2 feet in dimension. The sample will be collected within approximately the first hour of a rain storm. If a sufficient volume of sample cannot be collected from the catch basin, a sample will be collected as close to the sampling point as possible.
The surface water sample will be collected in the proper containers, labeled, and packed on ice for deli very to the 1 aboratory. IT • s chain-of-custody procedures will be fo 11 owed to ensure integrity of samples de 1 i vered to the laboratory.
Laboratory Analysis
Samples will be analyzed for the following constituents:
• EPA methods 601, 602, and 625
• MEK by EPA methods 602 and 8015
• Acetone by EPA method 624
• ICP metals: Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr, Co, Cu, Fe,
Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, K, Ag, Na, Tl, V, and Zn.
• Hg and Se by atomic absorption spectroscopy
• Phosphate
• Sulfate
• Chloride
• Nitrate
• Electrical conductivity
• pH
• TDS
• COD
• Alkalinity, TOC, BOD, oil and grease.
Ms. Mercedes Murillo
August 30, 1988
INTER~~ IONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
All analytical determinations will be made by a laboratory certified by the California Department of Health Services.
Sampling Schedule
Due to the uncertain and intermittent nature of precipitation in this area a specific sampling schedule cannot be determined. However, we expect to collect the surface water runoff sample by the end of December 1988.
If you have any questions concerning this proposal, please call the under signed at (714) 261-6441.
Respectfully submitted,
IT C9fPORAT~ON
~ttJ~~ (;l~n Audinis
P · ct Manager . ...... ---._
~ /1 ·~ .. ~-·
I ~
~ Fred W. Tahse
Project Director
JA/FWT:et
Enclosures: Figure 1 - Natural Drainage System
SIX:0827-L9
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region Letter Market Place Landfill - City Dump and Salvage #2 (File No. 88-50) cr
<(
I
t'-
C\J
C()
0 <:t
C\J
/5
LONG
C\
SITE~
SCALE
2000 4000 FEET 0
LEGEND
__ .,.._ SURFACE WATER FLOW
~ SURFACE WATER SAMPLE LOCATION
REFERENCE:
USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF
LONG BEACH, LOS ALAMITOS AND SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA QUADRANGLE; DATE: 1964, 1964 AND
1965 RESPECTIVELY; PHOTOREVISED= 1981; SCALE 1=24000
+
FIGURE
NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow &
I
l
I !
:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
LOS ANGELES REGION
107 SOUTH BROADWAY, SUITE 4027
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-4596
(213) 6204460
RECEIVED
• August 17, 1988
Ms. Judi McCaslin,
Construction Manager
Bixby Ranch Company
911 Studebaker Road
. Long Beach, California
IT CORPORATION ·IRVINE
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL-CITY DUMP & SALVAGE #2 (FILE NO. 88~50) Board staff has reviewed the revised SWAT proposal for the subject landfill. Staff conditionally approves the proposal at this time, with the understanding that the following items be submitted to this office under the schedules outlined below:
To be submitted by August 31, 1988:
1. A surface water monitoring plan (and map) designating the location (s) of proposed surface water sampling, sampling schedule, protocol and analyses. This procedure should be in accordance with Article 9 of Subchapter 15, Title 23,
California Code of Regulations, and the sampling should be proposed at least once during the SWAT monitoring period.
To be submitted prior to sampling of the monitoring wells:
2. A work plan by which you propose to identify the presence of multiple aquifers which may be present as the first water (obvious head differentials, chemical parameters, etc.).
To be included in the final SWAT report:
3. All available information on existing or abandoned oil wells on the property, including a ~ap.
4. As-built plans for the passive trench-vent gas system.
5. EPA Method 624 analyses for any unidentified peaks greater than 10% of the interval standard for purgeable organics obtained by EPA Methods 601/602 analyses.
6.· A more detailed geologic section, crossing the main body of the landfill.
Board staff feels that the SWAT requirements for· leachate sampling, vadose zone monitoring and permeability testing at the Market Place Landfill are not practical, and will waive them. These waivers are ' ' '
..... '., \'J
Ms. Judi McCaslin
granted based on information supplied by the owner that refuse in the landfill was placed below the ground water table.
Should you have any questions or comments, you may contact Mercedes A. Murillo at (213) 620-5444.
DENNIS DASKER
Supervising Water Resource
Control Engineer
RKD:MAM
cc: Mr. Jim Parsons, DWQ, SWRCB
~r. Fred w. Tahse, IT Corporation
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
LOS ANGELES REGION
107 SOUTH BROADWAY, SUITE 4027
LOS ANGELES, CALl FORNI A 90012-4596
(213) 620-4460
August 17, 1988
Ms. Judi McCaslin,
Construction Manager
Bixby Ranch Company
911 Studebaker Road
Long Beach, California
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL-CITY DUMP & SALVAGE #2 (FILE NO. 88-~.
Board staff has reviewed the revised SWAT proposal for the subject landfill. Staff conditionally approves the proposal at this time, with the understanding that the following items be submitted to this office under the schedules outlined below:
To be submitted by August 31, 1988:
1. A surface water monitoring plan (and· map) designating the location ( s) of proposed surface water sampling, sampling schedule, protocol and analyses. This procedure should be in accordance with Article 9 of Subchapter 15, Title 23,
California Code of Regulations, and the sampling should be proposed at least once during the SWAT monitoring period.
To be submitted prior to sampling of the monitoring wells:
2. A work plan by which you propose to identify the presence of multiple aquifers which may be present as the first water (obvious head differentials, chemical parameters, etc.).
To be included i~ the final SWAT report:
3. All available information on existing or abandoned oil wells on the property, including a map~
4. As-built plans for the passive trench-vent gas system.
5. EPA Method 624 analyses for any unidentified peaks greater than 10% of the interval standard for purgeable organics obtained by EPA Methods 601/602 analyses.
6. A more detailed geologic section, crossing the main body of the landfill.
Board staff feels that the SWAT requirements for leachate sampling, vadose zone monitoring and permeability testing at the Market Place Landfill are not practical, and will waive them. These waivers are v.
Ms. Judi McCaslin
granted based on information supplied by the owner that refuse in the landfill was placed below the ground water table.
Should you have any questions or comments, you may contact Mercedes A. Murillo at (213) 620-5444.
DENNIS DASKER
Supervising Water Resource
Control Engineer
RKD:MAM
cc: Mr. Jim Parsons, DWQ, SWRCB
Mr. Fred w. Tahse, IT Corporation
. __ J
.. ,
,I
i
H
'
I __
~ I I'
I
I .
I
rn
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
March 31, 1988
Project No. 240827
Mr. Raymond K. Delacourt, P.E.
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Los Angeles Region
107 South Broadway, Room 4027
Los Angeles, California 90012-4596
Dear Mr. Delacourt:
SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST PROPOSAL
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
· MARKET PLACE SANITARY LANDFILL
As consultants for the Bixby Ranch Company, we ~re hereby submitting to the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, the Solid Waste Assessment Test proposal (work plan) for the Bixby Market Place Sanitary Landfill, for which the work plan is due on or before April 1, 1988. · We would appreciate your reviewing the proposal and advising us or Bixby Ranch Company of proposal modifications the Board may wish to see made.
Sincerely,
IT CORPORATION
~~ w T4---
Fred W. Tahse
Project Director
FWT:et
Attachments: Solid Waste Assessment Test
Proposal - Bixby Market Place Sanitary Landfill
Regional Office
SIX:0827-L4M 17461 Derian Avenue • Suite 190 • Irvine, California 92714 • 714-261-6441 r-',
I .
LJ
II
·. I
u
r---]
i i
L]
11 ' I[
I I.
~. J
!. )
u
'. ) /1
f )
'--
)
·~-- J
. I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................••.•....
1.1 PURPOSE OF PROPOSAL ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
1.2 MANAGEMENT OF PROPOSAL EFFORT ••••••••••••••.•••••••••••
1.3 APPROACH •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
1.4 SOURCES OF DATA ••••••.••.•••••••.•••.•••.•••••.••••••••
2.0 INTRODUCTORY DATA ...•...•.........................•...•••...
2.1 NAME OF SITE ••••••••••.•••.•••••...•••.•...•••.••••••••
2.2 NAME OF OWNER AND OPERATOR •••••••.•••••.•••••••••••••••
2.3 LOCATION OF SITE ••••••.•.•••.••.••••....••.••..•••••.••
2.3.1 Street Address ...•....•....•.•...•......•.•••.•.
2.3.2 Township, Range, and Section ••••••••••••••••••••
2.3.3 County Assessor•s Parcel Number •••••••••••••••••
2.4 USAGE AND CAPACITY ••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••
2.4.1 Classification, Types of Waste, and Usage •••••••
2.4.2 Capacity and Quantities of Waste ••••••••••••••••
2.5 EXISTING PERMITS, ENFORCEMENT ORDERS AND ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY COMPLAINTS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
2.5.1 Permits ......................................... .
2.5.2 Existing Enforcement Orders ••••••••••••••••••••••
2.5.3 Administrative Civil Liability Complaints ••••••••
2.6 CLOSURE DATA •.••••.••••..••..••••..•.•.•••••.••.••..••••
2. 7 CLOSURE PLAN ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
2.8 PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND CERTIFICATION ••••••••••••••••••
2.8.1 Name and Address of Preparer •••••••••••••••••••••
2.8.2 Preparer•s Qualifications ••••••••••••••••••••••••
2.8.3 Certification of Accuracy and Completeness •••••••
2.8.3.1 Certifier•s Name and Registration Number.
2.8.3.2 Certifier•s Qualifications ••••••••••••••
2.8.3.3 Statement of Certification ••••••••••••••
3.0 SITE INFORMATION ........................•...................
3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS ••••••••••••
3.2 ANCILLARY FACILITIES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.2.1 Buildings •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.2.2 Waste Handling Areas ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.2.3 Equipment Handling Areas ••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.2.4 Roads .......................................... .
3.3 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.4 PRECIPITATION AND DRAINAGE CONTROL FACILITIES ••••••••••
3. 5 LINERS •••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.6 COVERS ••••••••••••••• , •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.7 LEACHATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL SYSTEM •••••••••••••••••
3.8 LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM ••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.9 SEPTAGE RECEIVING AREAS •.•••..•••••••.••••...•.•••••••• i
PAGE
1-1
1-2
1-2
1-2
1-2
2-1
2-1
2-1
2-2
2-2
2-2
2-2
2-2
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-4
2-4
2-4
2-5
2-5
2-5
2-5
2-5
2-6
2-6
2-6
2-6
3-1
3-1
3-2
3-2
3-2
3-3
3-3
3-3
3-4
3-4
3-4
3-4
3-5
3-5
n
! ]!
L 11
~
ll:
£'
4.0 n . I
•, J
ll
i i
' J
n I . Lj
1-l
. I I •
d
i]
LJ
~~
LJ
:--1
i_ J
r
I
' I
I , I
I
i I
I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT MONITORING PROPOSAL ••••••••••••••••••
4.1 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY •••••••••••••
4.2 4.3
4.4 4.1.1 Geomorphology .................•......••••.......
4.1.1.1 landforms .............•..•.......•.....
4.1.1.2 Drainage System ••••••••••••••••••••••••
4. 1. 2 Geo 1 ogy ........................................ .
4.1.2.1 General Description ••••••••••••••••••••
4.1.2.2 Lithology ............•..•....•.........
Soils and Alluvium •••••••••••••••••••••
Be·drock ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
4.1.2.3 Structure ......•......................•
Soils and Alluvium •••••••••••••••••••••
Bedrock ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
4.1.3 Hydrogeology ...•••........•....••...••.•...•...•
4.1.3.1 General Description ••••••••••••••••••••
Quality of Ground Water ••••••••••••••••
4.1.3.2 · Climatic Factors •••••••••••••••••••••••
Precipitation ••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Evaporation and Transpiration ••••••••••
4.1.3.3 Surface Water and Vadose Zone ••••••••••
General Description ••••••••••••••••••••
Stream Gaging Station and Rate of Flow •
4.1.3.4 Quality of Surface Water •••••••••••••••
Ground Water ••••.•••.••••..••••..••..•.
Springs ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
SCOPE OF WORK AND OBJECTIVES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• STATEMENT OF WORK .....••••..•••••••••..••••........••.• Phase I .••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••.••••••• Phase II .............................................. .
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
4.4.1 Drilling •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 4 • 4 • 2 S amp 1 1 ng •••••••••••.•••••••••••• ~ ••••••••••••••••
4.4.2.1 Surface Water Samples ••••••••••••••••••
4.4.2.2 Borehole Samples •••••••••••••••.•••••••
4.4.2.3 Ground-Water Samples •••••••••••••••••••
4.4.2.4 Sample Analysis ••••••••••••••••••••••••
Vadose Zone Soil Samples •••••••••••••••
Ground Water ..••••.••••.••••.••.••••.••
4.4.2.5 Sample Control •••••••••••••••••••••••••
Identification ••..••••••...•.••.•.••••.
Preparation, Packing and Shipping ••••••
Chain-of-Custody •••••••••••••••••••••••
4.4.3 Borehole Logging ...••..••....•..•......•.•.•••••
4.4.4 Installation of Monitoring Wells ••••••••••••••••
4.5 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN ••••.•••••••.•••••••••.••••••••••
4.6 SCHEDULE •••••••••••••••••••••.•••••.•••••••••••.•••••••
4. 7 REPORTING •••••••.••.•••••.••..••••••••••••••••••••••••• ; i
PAGE
4-1
4-1
4-1
4-1
4-1
4-2
4-2
4-2
4-2
4-3
4-3
4-3
4-4
4-4
4-4
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-6
4-6
4-6
4-6
4-7
4-7
4-8
4-8
4-8
4-8
4-9
4-10
4-10
4-10
4-10
4-10
4-11
4-12
4-12
4-12
4-13
4-13
4-14
4-14
4-16
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-18
fl
i
l J
[I
I 'I
l J
n
'. II ~J
i]l
LJ
fl
rj· 'I
L
: I . I
LJ
REFERENCES
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
FIGURE 2 - DETAILED TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
FIGURE 3 - AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
FIGURE 4 - CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES
FIGURE 5 - SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
FIGURE 6 - NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM
FIGURE 7 - REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP
FIGURE 8 - GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC SECTION
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
FIGURE 9 - HYDROGEOLOGIC SECTION ALONG SAN GABRIEL RIVER FIGURE 10 - WELL LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 11 - GROUND-WATER CONTOURS
FIGURE 12 - PHASE I PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATION MAP FIGURE 13 - SAMPLE SHIPPING INFORMATION FORM
FIGURE 14 - REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS FORM
FIGURE 15 - CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD FORM
FIGURE 16 - TYPICAL MONITORING WELL DETAILS
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
iii
n ! q
.:;:---)
~ ! ii
L I
n
ill! L J
n l J
n I I
I_ j
n
~1
[1
r j
l j
-I
/
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
SOliD WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST PROPOSAl
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
MARKET PlACE lANDFill
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE OF PROPOSAL
The California Water Code Section 13273, as amended by Assembly Bill 3525 (Calderon, 1984), requires that a determination be made of whether the Market Place landfill {Figure 1), which is owned by Bixby Ranch Company (Bixby), is leaking hazardous substances that may enter the ground-water system and degrade the quality of ground water. The California Water Resources Control Board {Board) has outlined a Solid Waste Assessment Test {SWAT), which, when performed, will enable Bixby to make the required determination and, thereby, comply with the requirements of the Water Code and Title 23, Chapter 3, Subchapter 15 of the California Administrative Code.
In order to assist disposal site owners and operators in planning their SWAT tests, the Board has deve 1 oped a guidance document, ent it 1 ed 11 So 1 i d Waste Assessment Test Guidance11 {Guidance). This document states that each disposal site owner and/or operator shall submit to the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board a report of the SWAT procedures and results when the test is completed (SWAT Report). The Guidance document also states that, in order to avoid possibly having to repeat the SWAT, a preliminary test proposal (SWAT Proposal) should be submitted to the Regional Board in order to obtain that Board1 S concurrence that the proposed test will, in fact, determine if the disposal site is leaking hazardous substances.
This document is the SWAT Proposal for the Solid Waste Assessment Test of the Market Place 1 andfi 11 • It has been prepared in strict accordance with the Guidance document.
SIX:0827-MKT 1-1
l L .
n
I I' ; I
i ·'
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
1.2 MANAGEMENT OF PROPOSAL EFFORT
This Proposal was prepared for the Bixby Ranch Company by IT Corporation. Its preparation was under the general supervision of Ms. Judi McCaslin, Construction Manager, Bixby Ranch Company, Long Beach, California. For information about IT Corporation, see 2.8.
1.3 APPROACH
In order to develop sound rationale for the design and emplacement of the proposed monitoring network, it was necessary first to acquire and analyze geoscientific and technical data within one mile of the landfill (site). The following approach was used: ..
a) a plan was developed, which, when implemented and
completed, would result in the acqui,sition, compilation and analysis of all available data pertinent to the
development of an understanding of the hydrogeologic
regime at the site;
b) a team of scientists and technicians was appointed by IT Corporation to gather the identified data;
c) the data were compiled and analyzed, and;
d) the proposed monitoring work program was devised.
1.4 SOURCES OF DATA
The following sources of information and data were used:
1. Agencies and departments of the City of Long Beach
• Bureau of Planning and Building Department
• Engineering Bureau
• Fire Department
• Department of Health Services
• Public Library
SIX:0827-MKT 1-2
II
I I!
~.cl
n
n
n L J
n
L J
n
ll
~l
" .. '. J :I
) l ; ~
L
I
H;
l
', i.
! r
) I
I
~j
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
2. Los Angeles County agencies
• Publ4c Works Department
• Engineering Bureau
• Fire Department
• Department of Health Services
• Public Library
3. State agencies
4. 5.
6. 7.
8. SIX:0827-MKT
• California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
• Department of Water Resources
• California Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles
Region (File No. 60-89)
• South Coast Air Quality Management District
• California Division of Mines and Geology
Bixby Ranch Company
Moore and Taber Consulting Engineers
SCS Engineers
Engineering Science, Inc.
Woolsey Engineering, Inc.
1-3
n
~ j
n
l I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
2.0 INTRODUCTORY DATA
·The Market Place landfill (site) is located in Los Angeles County within the :1 City of Long Beach, Ca 1 i fern i a, a 1 eng the northwestern intersection of the " l Pacific Coast Highway and San Gabriel River {Figure 1). The site occupies an ll area of approximately 13.6 acres and is situated on the floodplain of the San l J Gabriel River. Alamitos Bay is located approximately 1,000 feet west and the Pacific Ocean approximately 4,000 feet southwest of the site.
The landfill was in operation between mid-1960 and early 1961 and accepted I'
i , various residential and commercial wastes. During its operation, a cut and L J
'1
I I
I '
'- J
l J
u
r J
t I
H
I ' l
cover method of waste disposal was used.
Currently, the Market Place Office Park contains paved parking areas and various office buildings (Figures 2 and 3). The southeastern portion of the site is curre'ntly undeveloped. The property northeast of the Market Place site is also owned by Bixby and contains an oil field with operating wells.
2.1 NAME OF SITE
The site was known as the Market Place landfill. The site was also known as City Dump and Salvage No. 2. Los Angeles County records list the site as landfill number 42.160-375.
2.2 NAME OF OWNER AND OPERATOR
The 1 and on which the 1 andfi ll is located is owned by Bixby Ranch Company.
The site was leased from Bixby in 1960 by City Dump and Salvage, Inc., of Long Beach, California, for the purpose of disposing waste on a portion of the site. The site was operated by City Dump and Salvage as a landfill between mid 1960 and early 1961. The address and telephone numbers of the owner and operator are:
SIX:0827-MKT 2-1
n L ,
n LJ
n u
~.·. I 1!
I
I I
I :
I I
' I I ,
OWNER
Bixby Ranch Company
911 Studebaker Road
Long Beach, California 90815
{213) 493-1475
2.3 LOCATION OF SITE
2.3.1 Street Address
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
OPERATOR
City Dump and Salvage Inc.
No longer in business
Old address
411 Flint Avenue
Long Beach 14, California
The site is located at 6501 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California.
2.3.2 Township, Range, and Section
The site is located in a portion of the northwest one-quarter of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 12 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian (S.B.B.M.).
2.3.3 County Assessor•s Parcel Number
The Los Angeles County Tax Assessor• s parcel numbers for the Market Place Office Park property on which the landfill is located are: 7237-020, 025, 026, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, and 036. The landfill itself is located only within parcel numbers 7237-020-25, 026, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, and 036.
2.4 USAGE AND CAPACITY
2.4.1 Classification, Types of Waste, and Usage
The landfill is classified as a closed Class II sanitary landfill, pursuant to Subchapter 15, of Chapter 3, Title 23, California Administrative Code.
SIX:0827-MKT 2-2
n
L.,
nl. i I
I !
i_ l
n i II
L ;
11 I i
I I
I I
~ J
r'l
L J
l L J
'l! . I
L J
'. ]' • I L J
. I
I
I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
According to the Industrial Waste Disposal Permit for the site, the following types of waste were acceptable for disposal at the site:
a) non-water soluble,
including steel-mill
products therefrom;
non-decomposable inert solids,
slag, and asbestos fiber and
b) ordinary household and commercial refuse, including
small quantities of noxious materials in mixed loads of rubbish, cold ashes received in mixed loads of rubbish, dry mud cake from oil field sumps, paint ·sludge
received from water circulated paint spray booths not
transported in vacuum tanks, oil soaked excelsior or
straw used to absorb hydrocarbon oils from waste water, residue and grit from separation chambers from the
Hyperi on s 1 udge p 1 ant, paint in drums from which the major portion of liquids have been removed; and
c) garbage and market refuse.
Historical records indicate that approximately 30 barrels possibly containing rotary drilling mud liquids may have been disposed of at the landfill. In addition, ash residue resulting from a fire at the site, which lasted approxi mately 6 days (10-26-88 to 10-31-88), was landfilled in the southern portion of the site. From the Industrial Waste Disposal Permit, it is unclear whether liquids and semi-liquids were allowed to be disposed of at the landfill.
During its operation, the site accepted waste from the following clients of City Dump and Salvage, who were charged a fee to use the site: City of Long Beach, 8-Z Disposal Service, J and S Disposal Company (servicing the City of Lakewood), the Veteran's Administration Hospital, the Los Angeles County Flood Control District, and the general public.
2.4.2 Capacity and Quantities of Waste
The site contains approximately 200,000 cubic yards of waste. Figures 2 and 3 show the approximate boundary of the 1 andfi 11. Within this boundary, refuse was placed in a deep borrow pit located along the southeastern portion of the site and in numerous trenches located in the remainder of the landfill. The SIX:0827-MKT 2-3
II
i I l ;
n
~ I
L J
ll
' ' ' ' I '
L J
[l
ll
L~
i]
ll
[ J
[ l
H
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
borrow pit, which extended to approximately 35 feet below grade, was excavated with the use of a dredge line. Refuse thickness varies throughout the site, ·from as little as one foot to as much as 35 feet.
Residential, commercial and demolition waste comprise approximately 100 percent of the waste at the site.
2.5 EXISTING PERMITS, ENFORCEMENT ORDERS AND ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY
COMPLAINTS
2.5.1 Permits
Prior to closure, the site w~s operated under Industrial Waste Disposal Permit No. 2291 issued to City Dump and Salvage Incorporated in 1960 by Los Angeles County, Department of County Engineer, Industrial Waste Division (File No. I- 4903}. A Special Permit (No. 1430 (1)) was also issued to Bixby by the Los Angeles County Regional Planning Commission. This special permit was required in order to allow a borrow pit and waste disposal facility to operate within an M-3 (unclassified) zone. No other permits were applicable.
2.5.2 Existing Enforcement Orders
During its operation, the landfill was subject to waste discharge requirements contained in the Industrial Waste Disposal Permit {No. 2291). A separate permit was not issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
2.5.3 Administrative Civil Liability Complaints
There are no administrative civil liability complaints filed against the Bixby Ranch Company, City of Long Beach or the County of Los Angeles relating to the 1 andfi 11.
SIX:0827-MKT 2-4
n I .
" ·~
n l ~
IJ
l J
u
I
'
'l
; Jl.
L I
.H
~--
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
2.6 CLOSURE DATA
.·
The landfill is currently closed. The Industrial Waste Disposal Permit (No. 2291) was terminated on December 15, 1960, at which time City Dump and Salvage Incorporated continued to operate the landfill until late December, 1960, or January, 1961. Final cover was placed over the landfill by May 16, 1961.
2.7 CLOSURE PLAN
The site was closed, as directed by the Los Angeles County, Department of County Engineer by placing varying depths of artificial fill consisting of clayey sand, sandy silt, and silty clay over the entire landfill. Depths of fill vary from 6 inches to as much as 13 feet.
2.8 PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND CERTIFICATION
2.8.1 Name and Address of Preparer
This proposal was prepared by IT Corporation, whose address and telephone number are:
17461 Derian Avenue, Suite 190
Irvine, California 92714
(714) 261-6441
2.8.2 Preparer•s Qualifications
IT Corporation is an environmental management company, which provides technical and operational services to industry and government. The company addresses most aspects of hazardous materials/waste management problems. Its technical groups provide engine~ring, geologic and hydrogeologic services, analytical services, and nuclear waste services, and its over 1000 technical employees represent many disciplines, including chemistry, geology, hydrogeology, most fields of engineering analysis and design, environmental" science, and other applied sciences.
SIX:0827-MKT 2-5
n
I li
L l
n
L j
n
I I
- j
n
:.·J. I I
I
L.
u
I
.
]
r·~~
Ll
: I
j
: I
I I
I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
IT Corporation operates seven commercial hazardous waste landfills and treatment facilities in the State of California. These facilities were sited, · designed, permitted, and constructed by the company.
2.8.3 Certification of Accuracy and Completeness
2.8.3.1 Certifier's Name and Registration Number
The proposal •s accuracy and completeness have been certified by Fred W.
Tahse. Mr. Tahse is a geologist registered with the State of California, Board of Registration for Geologists and Geophysicists. His license number is 001552, expiration date 06/30/88.
2.8.3.2 Certifier's Qualifications
Mr. Tahse is· an employee of IT Corporation and Project Director and Manager for this SWAT program. He received a B.S. in geology in 1953 from Yale University and an M.S. in geology in 1957 from California Institute of Technology. He has over 30 years of experience in basic geologic studies, oil, gas and mineral exploration projects, and site analysis and characteriza tion programs. In the last 10 years, he has managed and participated in numerous geological, hydrogeological and geophysical programs.
2.8.3.3 Statement of Certification
I, Fred W. Tahse, certify that the data and information presented in this proposal are accurate and complete. I further certify that the conclusions and proposals herein are in accordance with accepted practices and procedures.
SIX:0827-MKT 2-6
Fred W. Tahse, Geologist
License No. 001552
'l'.
I I
c
n l l
'l
I i
- J
il
L J
~~
L_j
' L
']' ' I I ' L __
' I
l j
I I
: I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
3.0 SITE INFORMATION
· 3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS
The site is an irregularly shaped parcel approximately 1,200 feet long at its longest point and 350 feet wide at its widest point. The southern boundary of the site is the levee along the San Gabriel River, and the western boundary is Pacific Coast Highway (Figures 2 and 3).
On June 14, 1960, the County of Los Angeles Regional Planning Commission granted the Bixby Ranch Company a Special Zoning Permit (No. 1430) to establish, operate, and maintain a borrow pit, waste disposal facility, and land reclamation project on the Market Place property. This project was to prepare the land for future beneficial use. This Permit expired on December 15, 1960.
The site was leased from Bixby in 1960 by City Dump and Salvage, Inc. of Long Beach, California, for the purpose of operating a Class II waste disposal facility on a portion of the site. On September 14, 1960, City Dump and Salvage received an Industrial Waste Disposal Permit (No. 2291) from the County of Los Angeles, Industrial Waste Division, to operate the site as a Class II Waste Disposal facility.
According to historical records, surplus excavated material from the waste disposal site was to be used to fill in a strip of land approximately 350 feet wide between the waste disposal site and Pacific Coast Highway, which was much higher in elevation than the property. Based on the numerous borings drilled throughout the site, it appears that the majority of the property was filled in with artificial fill material.
SIX:0827-MKT 3-1
n
n
I il
l ~
n
I ;
' ' L J
n
1 I
u
r ]
l )
l . I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Presently, the southern portion of the site is undeveloped and consists of a vacant lot covered with numerous piles of soil, asphalt and concrete demolition debris. The remainder of the site is developed and contains paved parking areas, and various office buildings. The parking lot overlying the landfill contains numerous depressions resulting in a wavy, undulating surface as a result of settlement of the underlying refuse. Concrete curbs have sunk several inches and light poles have tilted out of plumb.
3.2 ANCILLARY FACILITIES
3.2.1 Buildings
A small office building was located on the site during the landfill 1 s operation. Currently, various commercial buildings are located on the site (see Section 3.1). However, all these buildings were constructed subsequent to the closure of the landfill.
3.2.2 Waste Handling Areas
During its operation, solid wastes were disposed of in a number of trenches of varying depths. Information on specific waste handling areas at the site were not found in historical records.
City Dump and Salvage began disposal operations at the site, which was open to the public 7 days a week, in mid-1960 (prior to receiving its permit).
Operations are believed to have begun in the southern portion of the site and progressed to the northern boundary. The di spas a 1 permit a 11 owed for the excavation and subsequent filling with refuse of a trench below the ground water table in the eastern one-third to one-half of the site. According to records obtai ned from the Regi ana 1 Water Qua 1 i ty Contra 1 Board, Los Ange 1 es Region, no bottom limitation to the fill was imposed.
SIX:0827-MKT 3-2
n
b
,I
1 'l
.. !i
L l
n
!
L J
'l
i I
lJ
L_
; J I
L.
LJ
, I
! I
I
~ J
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
The landfill utilized a cut and cover method of waste disposal in its daily operation. A dragline was used for excavating a deep trench (approximately 35 feet deep) along the south side of the proposed Studebaker Road. When brought to the site, refuse was placed near the edge of the trench and then pushed in by a tractor. According to the Industrial Waste Permit for the site, refuse was to be p 1 aced in 3-foot 1 ifts and covered with a minimum of 9- inches of soil. In addition, a daily cover of soil was to be placed over the refuse at the end of each day, and water was to be uti 1 i zed in order to compact the refuse.
The site ceased operations in early 1961 after the landfill was filled to its permitted capacity. Final cover of the landfill was in place by May 16, 1961.
3.2.3 Equipment Handling Areas
There were no specific equipment handling areas at the site. The following equipment is believed to have been used at the site: two D-9 Caterpillar tractors; two Caterpillar and Carryalls; a road grader; a water truck; and a Northwest crane.
3.2.4 Roads --
Presently, access to the site is through a number of entrances along the Pacific Coast Highway along the southern boundary and Westminster Boulevard along the northwestern boundary. A portion of the proposed future extension of Studebaker Road divides the undeveloped and developed portions of the landfill. During its operation, access to the site was from Pacific Coast Highway.
3.3 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES
The southern part of the site (undeveloped portion), which borders the San Gabriel River, contains an earthen levee, which is a flood control structure SIX:0827-MKT 3-3
n
n
n
n I . ~ J
]
[]
1.. l :1
!
ll
1 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
designed to prevent flooding along the river channel (Figure 4). While the site was active, earthen dykes and berms were constructed on the site parallel to Pacific Coast Highway to minimize drainage onto the site. These dykes and berms no longer exist.
3.4 PRECIPITATION AND DRAINAGE CONTROL FACILITIES
Runoff of precipitation onto the northern part of the site (developed portion) is controlled by the presence of asphalt pavement and buildings, which divert the runoff into storm drains. The southern part of the site ( undeve 1 oped portion) does not contain structures that control runoff (Figure 3).
3.5 LINERS
Liners have not been used at the landfill.
3.6 COVERS
According to historical records, refuse was to be placed in 3-foot lifts and covered with a minimum of 9-inches of sci 1. In addition, a daily cover of soil was to be placed over the refuse at the end of each day, and water was to be utilized in order to compact the refuse. Soil for the covers was obtained from on-site sources. The cover for the landfill consists of artificial fill (Section 2.7) in depths ranging from 6 inches to 13 feet throughout the site. In addition, the northerly half of the landfill is covered by an asphalt-paved parking lot.
3.7 LEACHATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL SYSTEM
There is no leachate collection an,d removal system at the site.
SIX:0827.,.MKT 3-4
n L J
n
I I
'J
n
L j
n
u
J
'l
li
·~'
; I l
ll
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
3.8 LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM
·The only leak detection system at the site consists of a passive trench-vent system near the northern landfill boundary, which was installed as a result of a gas migration investigation performed for Bixby. Eight trench vents and 7 vent pipes located in refuse prevent the accumulation of subsurface landfill gas and subsequent migration of gas toward adjacent structures. Fifteen monitoring wells were also installed to provide data for the evaluation of system effectiveness. Monitoring for all systems is performed on a quarterly basis by SCS Engineers, Inc., with results reported to the City of Long Beach.
3.9 SEPTAGE RECEIVING AREAS ·
Septic tank liquid waste was not accepted at this landfill.
SIX:0827-MKT 3-5
n l J
r'l
~ J
l
il. u
n
J
'l
J
]
' .. ) !• '
'--
r.·l ,.
~-]
j
J
' j
. I
I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
4.0 SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT MONITORING PROPOSAL
The following paragraphs describe the monitoring system work program that IT Corporation proposes to conduct in order to test whether the. 1 andfi 11 is leaking hazardous substances to the ground-water system. The proposal was prepared in accordance with the provisions and requirements of Section III, Paragraph A through G of the Guidance document, dated December, 1987.
4.1 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
In order to determine the paths most likely to be taken by landfill leachate and to decide the most effective sample collection locations, it is essential to have an understanding of the geology and hydrogeology of the site. The following data and discussions have been included in order to provide that understanding.
4.1.1 Geomorphology
4.1.1.1 Landforms
The topography within one mile of the landfill is generally flat with a surface elevation ranging from 5 to 10 feet above sea level. Two hills, Landing Hill and an unnamed hill, are present within one mile of the perimeter of the landfill (Figure 1). Landing Hill is located approximately 2,000 feet southeast of the landfill and extends to approximately 54 feet above sea level. The unnamed hill is located approximately 1.1 miles northwest of the landfill and extends to approximately 75 feet above sea level. California State University at Long Beach is located on top of the unnamed hill.
4.1.1.2 Drainage System
The landfill is situated on the floodplain of the San Gabriel, River, which flows toward the south along the eastern boundary of the landfill, discharging SIX:0827-MKT 4-1
lJ
n l J
n I I L. J
n
' I i I
I_ j
[l
n
L. i/
.J
ll
I I' - l
r.J II
L
[ 1 l_
l I
ll
ll
' I I .
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
its waters into the Pacific Ocean approximately 4,000 feet south of the landfill (Figures 5 and 6). The river channel adjacent to the landfill is unlined and approximately 300 feet wide.
4.1.2 Geology
4.1.2.1 General Description
The site is located in the Newport-Inglewood Structural Zone of hills and mesas in the segment known as the Seal Beach fault zone (Figures 7, 8, and 9) • Erosion of this area by the ancestral San Gabri e 1 River has formed a lowland known as the Alamitos Gap.
The area is underlain by approximately 500 feet of Quaternary alluvial sediments, which unconformably overlie several thousand feet of Tertiary marine sediments (Figure 8).
4.1.2.2 Lithology
Soils and Alluvium
Recent alluvium beneath the site consists of approximately 100 feet of moderately permeable, interbedded deposits of sand, silt and clay with occasional lenses of gravel. The lower portion of this section is relatively impermeable, consisting of silts and clays.
Unconformably underlying the Recent alluvium are approximately 400 feet of well-stratified, interfingering beds of sand, gravel, silt and clay. These Pleistocene sediments are conformably underlain by approximately 1,400 feet of marine, semi-consolidated sands, silts and clays comprising the Upper Pica formation. The Middle and Lower Pica formations reach a thickness of approximately 1,300 feet and are composed of claystone, siltstone and sandstone predominantly of marine origin.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-2
r
' I ~. :
n
n
L '
n
n
L J
L
11 ! 'I
: J' L.'
L
.I
. I
I
~.I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
The Market Place landfill site has been reclaimed from a tidal marshland by land-filling with imported sandy material and soil obtained from the borrow pit and former cut-and-cover landfill operation located at the site. Recent marsh deposits .underlie the artificial· fill and consist of interbedded organic-rich, fine-grained sediments (clays and silts), beach sands, and fluvial sediments (sands and gravels) deposited by the ancestral San Gabriel River (HLA 1986).
Bedrock
Bedrock is not exposed at or near the site. Bedrock occurs at a depth of approximately 3,200 feet and consists of several thousand feet of sedimentary rocks. These rocks belong to the Repetto formation.
4.1.2.3 Structure
Soils and Alluvium
The Recent alluvium is generally flat lying (Figure 8). The Seal Beach fault trends approximately north 45 degrees west (N45°W) and is estimated to lie northeast of the site (Figure 7). Alluvial sediments of Pleistocene age have been affected by the fault activity, and their beds dip 5 to 15 degrees away from the fault.
Sediments of the San Pedro formation and Pica formation dip 5 to 10 degrees southwest on the coastward side of the Seal Beach fault and approximately 15 degrees northeast on the inland side of the fault. There is no surficial evidence of faulting in the Recent alluvium (U.S.G.S. Water Supply Paper, 1109) •
SIX:0827-MKT 4-3
l
n
: I
u
!I
I I
L_ J
l]
: I L,
[]
f] Ll
' i
i I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Bedrock
--
The structure of the bedrock directly beneath the site is not known. Beneath the San Gabriel River at a depth of approximately 4,500 feet, oil producing zones are displaced approximately 150 to 200 feet by the Seal Beach fault. At this depth, beds on the inland side of the fault dip 20 degrees northeast, while beds southwest of the fault dip gently towards the Pacific Ocean (U.S.G.S. Water Supply Paper, 1109).
4.1.3 Hydrogeology
4.1.3.1 General Description
The site lies within the Alamitos Gap, an area of sea-water encroachment (Figure 7), and is located within th~ Lower Santa Ana River Basin. Ground water in this area is generally saline and is not suitable for drinking water purposes. Fresh water is found in the Upper Pica formation between the depths of approximately 1,200 and 2,000 feet.
There are five different aquifers beneath the site within 500 feet of the surface. From the shallowest to deepest are the Recent Zone (R-Zone), C-lone, B-Zone, A-Zone, and I-Zone. All of these aquifers have been degraded by salt water encroachment.
The Sea 1 Beach fault, 1 ocated northeast of the site, has created a barrier between the aquifers deeper than 100 feet deep. These aquifers pinch out toward the fault on the inland side of the fault. On the coastal side of the fault, the aquifers pinch out toward the fault. The Recent Zone aquifer is not affected by fault activity and is in communication with the ocean. Figure 9 shows the relationship of the ~ive aquifers.
Regionally, ground water flows in a southerly direction with localized~ differences in the ground-water gradient resulting from daily tidal, seasonal SIX:0827-MKT 4-4
' L •.
'l
: J ' '
'
G I
L -
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
fluctuations, or artificially inducted gradient changes resulting from the extraction and injection of ground water from various water wells in the vicinity.
Quality of Ground Water
Regionally, ground water within the uppermost aquifer (Figure 9), which is in hydraulic communication with the Pacific Ocean, is saline and is not being used as a source of domestic water. In the vicinity of the site, all aquifers are contaminated with high chloride concentrations.
Two separate ground-water investigations were performed on the site.
Beginning in July, 1986, Harding Lawson Associates installed ground-water monitoring .wells along the northwestern side of the site at the Exxon service ~1 station property. This investigation is still in progress. : j
r J
ll
,·:. !'
,,
I
u
I
, I
In April 1987, IT Corporation installed ground water monitoring wells along the southeastern portion of the site to evaluate the composition of the soil, refuse and ground water for future development purposes.c The results of these investigations will be included in the final SWAT report.
4.1.3.2 Climatic Factors
Precipitation
For the period 1966 to 1977, annual precipitation measured at the Long Beach Alamitos Land Company Station (U05508205), ranged from a low of 6.77 inches to a high of 19.46 inches. The average precipitation for those years was 11.72 inches per year. The majority of precipitation falls during the months of November through March (State of Ca 1 iforni a, Department of Water Resources, 1980).
SIX:0827-MKT 4-5
r--<1, . !
~ l
I
- j
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Evaporation and Transpiration
Pan evaporation rates have been measured at the Rio Hondo Station (Station 5- UOS-744111). For the period October, 1952, to September, 1972_, the average yearly evaporation rate was 47.64 inches. The lowest monthly evaporation rate (1.92 inches) was recorded in January, while the highest evaporation rate (6.67 inches) was recorded in July.
There are no data on the transpiration rate in the vicinity of the site. l 4.1.3.3 Surface Water and Vadose Zone
L.
~
l J
~ I
• I
-I
General Description
The San Gabriel River, which is influenced by oceanic tides near the site, borders the landfill on the southeast and is approximately 300 feet wide.
Surface water is always present within the channel, with the tidal influence extending approximately 1.9 miles north of the landfill. The river flows in a south to southwesterly direction discharging into the Pacific Ocean (Figures 5 and 6).
Stream Gaging Station and Rate of Flow
For the water year October, 1970, to September, 1980, average annual flow for the San Gabriel River at the Spring Street gaging station (Station No. F428- R), located approximately 4.2 miles northeast of the site, ranged from 27 cubic feet per second (cfs) to 253 cfs. The average flow for this 10 year peri ad was 78 cfs. The average vo 1 ume for the peri ad was 55,900 acre feet/year •
SIX:0827-MKT 4-6
n I ,,
l J
L
n L_J
n LJ
~l· L.
r.·., j .I
'
l j
: 1
I
·-· J
, I
I
'~-- )
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
4.1.3.4 Quality of Surface Water
Ground Water
There are approximately 182 wells within one mile of the landfill (Figure 11).
Most of the ground water wells were installed as water supply wells for irrigation and domestic uses. A series of 26 injection and 4 extraction wells are located along 7th Street (Figure 10). The Los Angeles Department of Public Works operates and maintains these wells as part of their Alamitos Barrier Project to stop the intrusion of seawater through the Alamitos Gap area. Ground-water monitoring wells were installed to monitor the leakage of motor vehicle fuel from a gasoline service station located a short distance northwest of the landfill. In addition, 2 ground-water monitoring wells were installed by IT Corporation in April, 1987, within the undeveloped portion of the landfill (southern portion) to evaluate the presence of hazardous materials beneath and adjacent to the site. Numerous active and inactive oil wells are also located north and northeast of the landfill.
Regionally, ground water flows to the south, following the general direction of surface flow in the San Gabriel River. Figure 11 illustrates the ground water gradient beneath the western portion of the site as measured on September 2, 1986 (HLA, 1986). As shown, ground water flow was to the south toward the ocean on this date. However, ground water may flow both in a northerly and southerly direction, because the landfill is within an area influenced by tidal fluctuations, and therefore, most likely varies in response to daily tidal or seasonal fluctuations.
Recent Aquifer ~round water elevations in the spring of 1986 ranged from about
1.9 feet above to 4 feet below sea level, except in the immediate vicinity of the Alamitos Barrier Project extraction wells, where much lower elevations exist due to the pumping depressions (LADPW, 1986). Depth to first ground water beneath the landfill is approximately 11 feet below grade, as measured in April, 1987 (IT, 1987).
SIX:0827-MKT 4-7
n1 ~
b -~
r1
; II
L )
l
I
: I
~I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Springs
There are no springs at the site.
4.2 SCOPE OF WORK AND OBJECTIVES
The scope of the proposed work program and its objectives are as follows:
1) drill four test holes in order to:
• characterize subsurface lithology;
• determine the depth to the ground-water table;
• determine the ground-water gradient and flow
direction.
2) following (1) and based on the findings of (1),
complete all four holes as upgradiert and downgradient
monitoring wells. If necessary, drill an optimally
located fifth hole and complete as an upgradient or
downgradient monitoring well.
3) collect and analyze ground water from final monitoring wells to determine if ground water has been
contaminated by hazardous substances. Surface water
samples will not be collected from the San Gabriel
River. Dilution by sea water makes it difficult to
obtain samples indicative of leakage of leachates from
the landfill.
4.3 STATEMENT OF WORK
The work program will be conducted in two phases, in order to define the ground-water gradient beneath the landfill more accurately.
Phase I
Phase I will determine the ground-water gradient beneath and immediately adjacent to the landfill. Due to the daily tidal or seasonal fluctuations of the ground-water table and gradient, four wells will be constructed at the locations shown on Figure 12. Phase I will consist of four tasks, as follows:
SIX:0827-MKT 4-8
n li
L )
n i I
l J
:l u
n ' i'
i.J
[I
[j
i 1 .,
[ j
l j
TASK
I
II
III
IV
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
ACTIVITY
Drilling, sampling and logging of
four boreholes.
Sample collection and analysis
Data compilation and analysis
Preparation of Phase II work program
Boreho 1 es MP-1 and MP-2 are 1 ocated north and northeast of the 1 andfi 11 and are intended to be the upgradient wells. Boreholes MP-3 and MP-4 are located south and southwest of the 1 andfi 11 and are intended to be the downgradi ent wells. Well IT-1, which was installed by IT in April, 1987, will also be used as a downgradient monitoring well.
Phase II
Phase II wi 11 consist of the dri 11 i ng and construction of a fifth we 11, if necessary. This well will be located based upon the results of Phase I.
Phase II will consist of four tasks, as follows:
Task Activity
I Drilling, sampling and logging of
fifth hole.
II Sample collection and analysis
III Compilation and analysis of all
data
IV Preparation of SWAT Report
SIX:0827-MKT 4-9
' J
t '
n
I
'- J
L j
;--;
! '
n
~. J
. I
I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
4.4 DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURES
· 4.4.1 Drilling
All drilling will be done with truck-mounted drilling rigs using continuous flight hollow-stem augers. All boreholes will be 10 to 12 inches in diameter.
In order to protect the integrity of the soil and ground water samples collected during drilling, the following procedures will be used:
• All boring tools and samplers will be washed and steam cleaned initially and after the completion of each
drill hole. All drill rods, bits, stems, well casing
and well screen will be cleansed by the following
methods:
- Steam clean
~ Rinse with clean, uncontaminated, unchlorinated water of a known quality and from a single source
- Air dry and store on above-ground racks.
• The samplers will be washed with a trisodium phosphate (TSP) solution and then rinsed with de-ionized water
between sampling.
• All personnel will use inert plastic gloves, which will be disposed of after use on a single hole.
• All personne 1 will handle too 1 s and materia 1 s in a coordinated manner to avoid cross-contamination.
4.4.2 Sampling
4.4.2.1 Surface Water Samples
Surface water samples will not be collected from the San Gabriel River.
4.4.2.2 Borehole Samples
A 11 boreho 1 e samp 1 es taken in unconso 1 i dated materia 1 will be obtai ned by stopping drilling, then lowering a split-spoon sampler to the drilling face SIX:0827-MKT 4-10
'~ ~'
II I ' c J
:1
. I
L J
n
I I
I L _..'
n
: I
I :
LJ
i
L_
li
: li L~
I'
Ll
, I
I
I I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
and collecting a sample in the split spoon sampler by hammering the sampler below the drilling face or forcing it below hydraulically. The spoon inside diameter will be 3 inches. An appropriate catcher will be used, depending on the type of material being drilled.
Samples taken at all boreholes where there is a vadose zone will be taken at approximately 5-foot intervals. A total of 2 soil samples will be analyzed from each well.
All drilled samples will be logged, and selected samples will be tested in the field for moisture content, pH, and electrical conductivity (1:1 soil to water suspension). Moisture will be determined with a Speedy Soil Moisture Tester. This method reacts the water in a samp 1 e with ca 1 ci urn carbide, 1 iberating acetylene gas, in a pressure bomb. The increase in pressure is read on a gauge on the pressure bomb, ca 1 i brated in percent soil moisture content. pH will be determined by mixing equal weights of water and rock or ·sail, agitating briefly then allowing the solid material to settle out of suspension. The pH of the supernatant liquid will then be measured.
El ectri ca 1 conductivity wi 11 be determined on an a 1 i quat of the supernatant liquid.
4.4.2.3 Ground-Water Samples
Ground water samples will be taken from the saturated zone during Phase II.
In order to obtain representative samples, each well (MP-1 through MP-4, and IT-1) will be purged by removing 3 to 5 well casing volumes of water before collecting a sample for analysis. The temperature, pH, and specific conductance of each well volume taken will be measured, and a sample will not be collected until these readings become stable. The purging will be accomplished by a submersible pump powered by a portable generator.
After the well has recovered, a water sample will be collected using a Teflon® bailer.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-11
n
I I
L j
n I I
L j
],
L l
n
I :!
LJ
!1
i
L J
i1
L_ J
li
r I L.
' I
I
t_ j
: i , I
l I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
4.4.2.4 Sample Analysis
Vadose Zone Soil Samples
Soil samples from the vadose zone will be chemically extracted (rather than pulverized) and then analyzed for the following chemicals, in accordance with the requirements of the SWAT Guidance:
Ground Water
EPA methods 8010 and 8020
(semi-volatile organics)
Chloride
Phosphate
Sulfate
ICP metals: Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr,
Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Me, Ni, K, Ag, Na, Tl,
V, and Zn.
Electrical conductivity
pH
IT proposes that a tot a 1 of seven ground-water samp 1 es be co 11 ected: two consecutive samp 1 es from each of the two proposed upgrad i ent we 11 s and one sample from each of the proposed downgradient wells. One upgradient sample from each well (MP-1 and MP-2) and all the downgradient samples will be analyzed for the following:
SIX:0827-MKT
EPA methods 601, 602 and 625
ICP metals: Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr
Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, K, Ag, Na, Tl,
V and Zn.
Phosphate
Sulfate
Chloride
Nitrate
4-12
" J
n
Electrical conductivity
pH
TDS
COD
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
If the above pollutant scan indicates anomalous concentrations of hazardous substances, the remaining two samples from the upgradient wells will be 1 analyzed for these substances to both corroborate the anomalies as well as to L -·
L '
;o_, I·-
• .1 1-)
L
~ l
' I
- i
, I
i
i
provide statistical accuracy to final reported results.
Except for field determinations of physical characteristics, all analytical determinations will be made by a laboratory certified by the California Department of Health Services.
In accordance with sound practices, trip blanks and field blanks will be run with all chemical analyses.
4.4.2.5 Sample Control
The following procedures provide for the identification, preservation, packaging, handling, shipping, and storage of samples obtained in the field, so that all samples can be readily identified and will retain, to the extent possible, their original nature.
Identification
Samples will be marked for identification at the time of collection. Marking will be on a tag or label attached to the sample container (jar, bottle, bag, etc.). Sample identification will include:
• Project name and number
• Unique sample number
• Sampling location (e.g., boring, depth or sampling
interval, and field coordinates)
• Sample date
SIX:0827-MKT 4-13
'c---:
'l
',
I'
c. l
! ' L j
~~~
:__)
'j,
I
- i
[J
~ I
'I \
'-I
! I
!
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
• Individual performing the sampling
• Preser~~tion or conditioning employed.
Preparation, Packing and Shipping
Samples will be placed in containers compatible with the intended analysis and properly preserved. Polyethylene or glass containers usually are required, and, in most cases, samples must be cooled to ab~ut four degrees Centigrade (4°C). Samples will be placed in ice chests with adequate amount of ice, sealed, addressed, identified, and placarded as appropriate.
As soon as fie 1 d personne 1 have consigned samp 1 es to a commercia 1 carrier, they will notify the laboratory by telephone of the shipment. If the samples are transported by field personnel, the estimated time of arrival at the laboratory will be given. Figure 13 will contain the information that will be provided to the 1 aboratory. A b 1 ank of this form wi 11 be camp 1 eted at the laboratory during the telephone conversation.
The final step that will be used to provide information to the laboratory is shown in Figure 14. The Request for Analysis form will be completed by the field personnel, or other appropriate project personnel, and included with the chain-of-custody record. The Request for Analysis will be provided so that analytical requirements will be defined and sample holding times will not be exceeded.
Chain-of-Custody
An essential consideration in obtaining accurate chemical analyses is the ability to demonstrate that the samples were obtained from the locations stated and that they reached th~ laboratory without alteration. Evidence of collection, shipment, laboratory receipt,' and laboratory custody until disposal must be documented to accomplish this. Procedures will be used that accomplish this documentation through a chain-of-custody form that records SIX:0827-MKT 4-14
r
I '
- J
n
I ,I
L_ J
~l
')
I
L_ J
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
each sample and the individuals responsible for sample collection, shipment, and receipt. Figure 15 shows the chain-of-custody form that will be used in the collection and shipping of samples.
The following procedures will be followed for all samples subject to chemical analysis:
• Sample containers will be sealed in the field. Any
samp 1 es that do not arrive at the 1 aboratory with
seals intact will not be considered to have been in
valid custody.
• A chain-of-custody record will be initiated in the
field for every sample. A copy of this record will
accompany its sample.
• Each time responsibility for custody of the sample
changes, the new custodian will sign the record and
denote the date. All custody changes of samples
will be a person-to-person exchange of custody
documents and samples.
• Upon sample destruction or disposal, the custodian
responsible for the disposal will complete the
chain-of-custody record, fi 1 e a copy, and send a
copy to the Project Manager or to his designated
representative for recordkeeping.
• The custody of individual sample containers will be
documented by indicating appropriate chain-of
custody information on each sample tag or label for
all chemical analysis samples.
• The following documentation will supplement the
chain-of-custody records:
Field log book ultimately to be filed in the
project files
- Sample label on each sample
- Sample seal on each sample
Field collection report
- Photographic records (wherever practical and to
the extent economically feasible}.
• Prior to sampling, all personnel involved will have
received copies of the chain-of-custody procedure
and will be instructed in its use.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-15
- j
r--
·- J
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Multipart chain-of-custody forms will be used so that a copy can be returned to the individual shipping the samples after they are received at the laboratory and after they are disposed of.
4.4.3 Borehole Logging
An IT geologist will supervise the operations of the drilling rig and perform sample collection and logging of soil samples. The logging information recorded in the field will include:
• Headspace analysis. Selected soil samples will be
checked in the field for presence of volatile organics
using a volatile organic analyzer, such as an HNu-model photoionization detector.
• Heading information, including project number, boring number, person responsible for logging the hole, ground elevation and coordinates, and date started and
completed.
• Depth, recorded in feet and tenths of feet.
• Detailed soil descriptions, including:
- major soil component
- secondary components and estimated percentages
- Unified Soil Classification symbol
- - color
- consistenGY or density
-moisture content- listed as an adjective (e.g., dry,
moist, wet)
- texture
- depositional origin.
• Depth/elevation interval
• Depth/elevation of lithologic changes
• Water-table information and method of determination
• Sample drive and recovery
• Equipment details
• Drilling sequence and comments
• Problems encountered
SIX:0827-MKT 4-16
-- j
L_)
~]
]
: )
J
: I
- )
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
4.4.4 Installation of Monitoring Wells
Upon completion of Phase I, monitoring wells will be completed according to the industry standards for monitoring wells for hazardous waste sites. The well design that will be used is shown in Figure 16. The wells will be constructed of 4-inch nominal diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well screen (0.010-inch slots) and flush-threaded PVC riser pipe. The screened interval will be 15_ feet long, with 10 feet of this length below and 5 feet above the ambient static water level. The annular space of the screened interval and 2 to 3 feet above it will be packed with #2 silica sand. A 1 to 2-foot bentonite pe 11 et p 1 ug wi 11 be emp 1 aced above the sand pack. From the upper bentonite seal to the surface, the annular space will be grouted with Volclay grout. A one-inch PVC tremie pipe will be used to place all material into the annular space.
Each well will be completed either in a concrete vault with a locking steel traffic cover or a steel stand pipe equipped with a locking cap.
A sketch of each monitoring well, showing depth of well, bottom of the boring, screen length and depth interval, coupling location, gravel pack, bentonite seal, grout, cave-ins, location of bedrock, and location of ground surface, will be maintained in the project files, along with the original boring logs. The sketch also will include the actual composition of the grout, seals, and gravel pack.
4.5 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
See Appendix A.
4.6 SCHEDULE
Drilling, installation, development and sampling of the proposed monitoring wells and analysis of samples will be done according to the following schedule:
SIX:0827-MKT 4-17
t ~'
,:
' :
c ,'
1. - J
2. r··\
L " 3.
r·
L J 4.
5. 6.
rc,
, I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
ACTIVITY
Water Quality Control Board reviews and
approves monitoring well work program
Begin monitoring well work program; collect
soil samples.
Complete monitoring well construction and
collect water samples
Complete sample analyses
Submit preliminary SWAT Report to Bixby
Submit final SWAT Report to RWQCB
DATE
6/0l/88
7/15/88
7/22/88
8/29/88
9/01/88
7/01/89
• I
L J 4.7 REPORTING
r'
l J
[)
r I
L.,
J
M
. j
Following the completion of Phase II, a final report will be submitted to the Water Quality Control Board. This report will include the following:
• Well construction diagrams;
• Boring logs of all drill holes;
• List of soil samples taken and tabulation of field
parameters measured:
- Physical description
- Moisture content
- Electrical conductance
- pH
• List of water samples taken and tabulation of field
parameters measured:
SIX:0827-MKT
Specific conductance
- pH
- temperature
4-18
r
'l.
c )
I ;
! c J
~ l
:)
~ )
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
• All analytical results
• Description of hydrogeology
• Site characteristics
• Waste characteristics
• Air quality solid waste assessment test
• Solid waste assessment test summary
• Preliminary conclusion.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-19
,--,
I
I j
~ J
. -,
I' ,.
,.,
I !I
j
L
ll
~ l
~ )
i. j
u I I
t j
: I
!
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
REFERENCES
Engineering Science, Inc., 1976, Report of Gas Migration Investigation, The Market Place, Long Beach, California, Job No. 2134.
Harding Lawson Associates, 1986, Hydrogeologic Investigation Exxon Service Station 7-3047, Long Beach, California, Job No. 4167, 138.11 • IT Corporation, 1987, Report, Assessment of the Bixby Ranch Company Sanitary Landfill for the Presence of Hazardous Substances, Job No. 240402.
Los Angeles Department of Public Works, 1985-1986, Alamitos Barrier Project, 22nd Annual Report.
Moore and Taber Consulting Engineers, and Geologists, 1986, Interim Foundation Investigation Report, Proposed Office and Restaurant Buildings, Market Place Office Park Phase II, Long Beach, California, Job No. 186-63.
Moore and Taber Consulting Engineers and Geologists, 1987, Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Studebaker Road Extension, Long Beach, California, Job No. 187-73.
Moore and Taber Consulting Engineers and Geologists, 1986, Interim Foundation Investigation Report Proposed Market Place Movie Theater, Long Beach, California, Job No. 186-73.
U.S. Geological Survey, 1956, Ground-Water Geology of the Coastal Zone, Long Beach-Santa Ana Area, California, Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1109.
U.S. Geological Survey, 1959, Hydrology of the Long Beach-Santa Ana Area, California, Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1471.
SIX:0827-Rlref R-1
t
['
c '
[l
r-,
I'
FIGURES
:-I~
I' I
,.)
l_
<
I
f'-
(\j
OJ
0 <:j
(\j
M
0>
0>
+
SEAL
\\ SCALE
SITE~ 0 2000 4000 FEET
REFERENCE:
USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF
LONG BEACH, LOS ALAMITOS AND SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA QUADRANGLE; DATE: 1964, 1964 AND
FIGURE
10PIY:lRAPrll-=- MAP 'JF
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
1965 RESPECTIVELY; PHOTOREVISED: 1981; SCALE 1=24000 "' ~L_----------------------------------------------~
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
N111 •-;1 ;1!p Tt'1:-, [ '·l~·.·n·;
\.[)
<(
I
r-
N
CD
c
"' N
,; i;
:. i · .
. ; I.-~ ..
•:
~(,Tf
+ ·'·
LEGEND
-5-- TCPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR
SCALE
~____, I
0 600 1200 FEET
~ffEREfKE
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
CF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982
FIGURE 2
OETAI LED TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF
MARKET PLACE LANDFIL~
PRf F'APf [l f ()P
BIXBY RANCH CCMP,L'.,NY
LONG BEACH, C,l'.,LIFORNIA
+
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
REFERENCE
LLOYD DEMERS AIR VIEW. INC.
DATE OF PHOTOGRAPH: JANUARY 1 987
FIGURE 3
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
MARKET PLACE SITE
f'Rf F'ARf ~l f ()R
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA
rn
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
<1:
I
1'
N
co
0 <j"
N
>- >
Q)Q)
oo ww
::L > uO wa::
I a. ua.
<(
+
LEGEND:
SURFACE- WATER
FLOW DIRECTION
/5....-- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR
SCALE
r--------,
0 600 1200 FEET
REFERENCE:
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
Do Not Scale Thts Drawtng
:·. '. ~· . .'·: ... " .......
FIGURE 4
CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
Bl X BY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALl FORNIA
+
rn ... Creating a Sater Tomorrow
\.0
~
I
r
N
OJ
0 <;J
N
>- >
(IJ(IJ
oo ww
>::> uO
wa:
I a. ua. <
~ s
NOTE
+
LEGEND:
SURFACE-WATER
FLOW DIRECTION
5_.......- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR
..--/
SCALE
r--~~
0 600 1200 FEET
REFERENCE:
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
·-oo Not Scale Th1s Draw1ng·
.
10 I
1112W ~ :.; $0 1/<1 $ECTION2 T$$ 111210'
;~~ i'_i :;-;.~,-~,-~,-~-·___;,;_~~---- :;;::t£.:= ...
.....
+
FIGURE 5
SURFACE- WATER FLO N Dl RECTI ON
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH 1 CALl FORNIA
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
<X'
<!
I
1'--
C\J
ro
0 <;J-
C\J
c za:
-'"-;>Y
~ ~
.;
j
.,
I
1 •••
~--
·::: ..
8,:-
,LONG
+
C\
SITE~
SCALE
0 2000 4000 FEET
LEGEND ----
_ _.,.,.._ SURFACE WATER FLOW
REFERENCE:
USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF
LONG BEACH, LOS ALAMITOS AND SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA QUADRANGLE; DATE: 1964, 1964 AND
1965 RESPECTIVELY; PHOTOREVISED= 1981; SCALE 1=24000
r ;. N· ,, '--,, ,1!,, T ~ .. •, : 1, 1..,,, , 1 .:
.. .. .
, .. . . • .. =·.:1[i.·
·e IIi lr~"'.·
•
+
-------
FIGURE 6
NATURAL DRAINAGE SY::iTEM
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARE'[) FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
~',j
<!
: J
ex:;
0 7
(\..,
j
-+
LEGEND:
Qal
0 ALLUVIAL AND COASTAL
DEPOSITS
I
Qpu ' TERRACE COVER
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
THE SEAL BEACH FAULT
SCALE
2000
SEE FI'O'JRE 9 FOR CROSS-SC:CT,ON
REFERENCE :
USGS WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1109 PLATE 3.
FOR TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE SEE FIGURE I.
Do Nol Scale Thts Drawtng
4000 FEET FIGURE 7
REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP OF
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
I
I I
APPROXIMATE
A PROJECTION OF A1
LANDFILLl SOJTHWEST NORTHEAST
~ ---------------1--------------------- -
I
PACIFIC SEAL
SAN PEDRO ALAM_ITOS COAST BEACH LOS CERRITOS
. SEA LEVEl.
......
BAY BAY --~ r _- F
1 A~~~ CHANNEL
~~I~_ ---~-~ .. _-::::::::0 _::::-:-:-r;z;:z~~~--~-~-. +--··· .::": SEA
:...EVEL
~ ~
>- >- :::?:
::J CDCD f-
oo <(
ww 0
'I[_> ui uo wa: (.9
I o.. U1
uo.. ::J ~
-
~ f-ECO co w w
O<;t LL
~
~~ z
z 0 -
s:>- f-
~CD <(
a: > 0 w
L.- .J
I.LJ
-100 I-
-20() I-
-.30') I-
~
--
0 0 . o .. o.~ D
0 0 .<>
o. 0: 0. 0 0
-- 0 0 0
0 0 . 0
~ . 0
0 -100
- -200
-300
-400 ~-------------- --------- ------------------·- - - -400 0 LEG'::ND
B
[~
L...:..J
Rt::FERENCE
SILT AND CLAY
SAND
GRAVEL
0 STAE OF CALIFORNIA-DEPARTMENT OF
WATER RESOURES, STUDY OF ALAMITOS
GAP JUNE II 1956.
HORIZONTAL SCALE
i/2
VERTICAL SCALE
100 200 FEET
F::,l HE 8
GENERAL:ZED ;;:oJ11:-:; S!::CTION
MARKt.T PLA ~~ _AI\J'JFILL
PRfPAHf~ ,,,p
a,xBY RA['.jCrl ~OMPMJY
I Q[\j~1 BFA·-~H. JAL!FIW~:A
rn ... Creating a Sater Tomorrow
._I
0 <(
I
1'
C\.1
ro
0 <;j"
C\.1
>->-en CD
oo ww
~>
uO we: Io._
uo.. <(
APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF
MARKET PLACE
LANDFILL
SOUTHT
-100
-200
1-_,
::::>
1i:
-300
l ~
-400
:X:
'-' «
"' co
-500
_,
«
"'
U)
0 APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF
STUDEBAKER
LOYNES
LANDFILL
... ...
VERTICAL SCALE
100 200
APPROXIMATE
LOCATION OF
300 FEET
NORTH
S.L.
-100
-200
- -300
-400
-500
HORIZONTAL SCALE- SCHEMATIC
LEGEND:
AQUIFER BOUNDARY
~ AND NAME
CONFINING TO SEMI
CONFINING LAYER
REFERENCE:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS, ANNUAL REPORT ON THE
CONTROL OF SEA WATER INTRUSION 1986-87.
Do Not Scale Th1s Oraw1ng
FIGURE 9
HYDROGEOLOGIC SECTION
ALONG THE SAN GABRIEL RIVER
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED F-OR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CAL/ FORN /A
rn ... Creating a Sater Tomorrow
(j)
<(
I
1'-
C'J
OJ
0 <j-
C'J
r"
~: <.: ::. .
..:
j
l
'-.'..-· :_., ~ .
,,
"'' "
... ~~
-?
"'
LONG
i
+ ,__\'
~~
/J
I
~_,{) ! :ghts
~)
~ 0
~
SCALE
0 2000 SITE
NOTE
LEGEND
0 WATER WELL
INJECTION WELL
EXTRACTION WELL
4000 FEET
0 ANC 1:. SYMBO~ED WELLS ARE PART OF THE
AL..Arv11Tn"' S::A WAr::r-c. 'Nfr-c. r,n,, ~1-\Kr-c.l::r-c. PRr li:'JT FOR TOPOGRAPH!C REFERENCE SEE F ,G'JRE I.
F~~~~ Stat10n • .~:·;
Q(J"
+
+
""'13
FIGURE 10
WELL LOCATION MAP
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
>-Iii [IJ
oo ww
:.::> uo wa:
~5u}
_..........,.......,rrTJ-r
I a..<» u a... <'"'""?
<( "'-s-
+
LEGEND
MP-4EB
IT-IS
...... 1.0--
PROPOSED WELL LOCATION
EXISTING MONITORING WELL
GROUND WATER CONTOUR
(APPROXIMATE ELEVATION)
--5-- SURFACE CONTOUR
SCALE
r------,
0 600 1200 FEET
REFERENCE:
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
Do Not Scale Th1s Draw1ng
10 .
I
ION 2 T. II' ~J~ ~- .- .. ,
~ lo'·-
.~· '.
,•'
FIGURE II
APPRO X !MATE
GROUNC WATER CONTOURS
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALl FORNIA
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
__ ____!
>-fj
00 oo
ww
::<: > uO
wa:
I li:.,
u <( ~C'-$-
• s
t-.OTE
+
LE'JEN!J
MP-4"±l FROPCSEIJ WE:...L LOCATION
IT-t~ EXISTtN:; MONITORING WEc..L
SCALE
r------,
0 600
REFERENCE:
1200 FEET
.H-,
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
"Do Not Scale Th1s Draw1ng
FIGURE 12
PrlASE" I
PR·)POSED MONI IQkiNG \V~I __
LOCATIOiJ l·:]~,p
MARKET PU~ ~E :_Aii!'"'F t _L
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH 1 CALIFORNIA
+
rn 0 0 0 Creating a Safer Tomorrow
I
~ ]
~]
n
l. I
.:.._ __ ]
IT CORPORATION
FIGURE 13
SAMPLE SHIPPING INFORMATION
SHIPMENT INFORMATION
(Field to Lab by Telephone)
Date of Shipment: ______________________ _
Laboratory Destination: ________________________________________________ _ Laboratory Project Contract: ____________________________________________ _ (Name} (Telephone Number)
Number Containers Shipped: ____________ _
Mode of Shipment=----------------------
Shipment Number(s) =---------------------
Time of Shipment: __________________ _
Date/Time of Shipping Information Transmitted to Lao; _______________ _ Individual Contacting Lab; ___________________________________________ __ Individual in Lab Receiving Information=-------~------------------- NOTE: PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION TO RECEIVING
LABORATORY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER
SA!vlPLES ARE SHIPPED.
[]]
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT MANAGER
BILL TO
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
Sample No. Sample Type Sample Volume
--l ,--- -~
FIGURE 14
REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS
DATE SAMPLES SHIPPED
LAB DESTINATION
LABORATORY CONTACT
SEND LAB REPORT TO
DATE REPORT REQUIRED
PROJECT CONTACT
l
PROJECT CONTACT PHONE NO.
Preservative Requested Testing Program
TURNAROUND TIME REQUIRED: (Rush must be approved by the Project Manager.) Normal ___ _ Rush ___ _ (Subject to rush surcharge)
R/A Control No.
C/C Control No. ______ _
Special Instructions
POSSIBLE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION: (Please indicate if sample(s) are hazardous materials and/or suspected to contain high levels of hazardous substances) Nonhazard __ _ Flammable __ _ Skin Irritant __ _ Highly Toxic __ _ SAMPLE DISPOSAL: (Please indicate disposition of sample following analysis. Lab will charge for packing, shipping, and disposal.) Return to Client __ Disposal by Lab __
FOR LAB USE ONLY
Received By--------------
WHITE- Original, to accompany samples
YELLOW- Field copy
Date/Time---------
Other--------
(Please Specify)
' I l
[]]
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
FIGURE 15
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
R/A Control No. ______ _
C/C Control No. A 7 9131
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER LAB DESTINATION
SAMPLE TEAM MEMBERS---------------- CARRIER/WAYBILL NO. ---------------- Sample Sample Date and Time Sample Container Condition on Receipt Disposal Number Location and Description Collected Type Type (Name and Date) Record No. "
.
Special Instructions: ---------------------------------------------------- Possible Sample Hazards:-------------------------------------------------- SIGNATURES: (Name, Company, Date and Time)
1. Relinquished By:--------------------
Received By: ______________________ _
2. Relinquished By:---------------------
Received By:
WHITE- To accompany samples
YELLOW- Field copy
3. Relinquished By:--------------------
Received by:-----------------------
4. Relinquished By:--------------------
Received By: ______________________ _
>->ccCC
oo wW
:.:> uo wa:
I a._
u~
1984 IT CORPORATION
LL COPYRIGHTS RESERVED
lo Not Scale Th1s Draw1ng·
LOCKING WELL COVER
WELL PAD
GROUND SURFACE
l~ffl-----BENTONITE SEAL
1/4" BENTONITE PELLETS
:::!:-i~:+.+-----4" DIAMETER, 0.010" CONTINUOUS SLOT
I
12 11
...
NOT TO SCALE
PVC WELL SCREEN
FIGURE 16
TYPICAL MONITORING WELL DETAILS
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
r
~I
~I
~I
~~
~~ .
~I
~]
~]
~I
J
! I u
' I ~
'
APPENDIX A
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
li
' I
r I
'- I
, I
L .
~- /
r--~
'-
!1
ll
~I
[)
[j
~j
~j
:1
'
:____I
• I
I
I ! Ll
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
APPENDIX A
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
1.0 INTRODUCTION
It is the policy of IT Corporation to ensure that all of our geotechnical activities are conducted in a manner that is both safe and healthful. Since it is apparent that certain accident and injury risks are unavoidably associated with the proposed soils drilling and sampling work at the Site, efforts will be made to identify, evaluate, and control all potential health and safety hazards that may be encountered by our Site personnel. In order to account for these Site specific control measures, a health and safety plan has been devised for the proposed project work, the contents of which are categorically described in the following discussion.
2.0 HAZARDOUS IDENTIFICATION
2.1 CHEMICAL HAZARDOUS
Since all of the planned geotechnical activities will be conducted in non contaminated areas around the periphery of the Site, any chemical contamination, if encountered at all, will be found within the soil and ground water as dilute components of landfill leachate which has infiltrated the underlying soil in the work area. Although it is possible that some of these leachate constituents may, in fact, consist of hazardous chemicals, the leachate mixture itself is likely to be water soluble, stable, and present in conservative nature of our planned drilling and sampling work in conjunction with these chemica 1 /phys ica 1 characteristics substantially reduces the possibility that significant chemical exposures will be experienced by our Site personnel. Under these conditions, chemical exposure hazards are almost exclusively confined to direct skin contact with the contaminated soil an9 ground water, a condition which can be controlled through the judicious use of the personal protective controls discussed below.
SIX:0827-AppA A-1
I'
-I
~I
'I L .
~]
tl
~ I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Hydrogen sulfide and methane gas are typically found within municipal land fills as products of anaerobic bacterial digestion, and subterranean pockets of these gases may be encountered during the construction of the monitoring wells. If allowed to accumulate at high concentrations in confined spaces, methane gas can form an explosive mixture with air. Hydrogen sulfide, on the other hand, presents a severe respiratory hazard when inhaled at high concen trations. Periodic air sampling of the jobsite will be conducted with a combustible gas indicator and hydrogen sulfide detector to verify these safe ambient air levels.
2.2 PHYSICAL HAZARDS
In addition to the aforementioned chemical hazards, physical hazards, which are normally associated with drilling equipment, can be expected to exist at the jobsite. Proper and customary precautions will be taken to guard against these hazards.
2.3 HAZARD SURVEY
In an effort to identify other hazards that may be present at the jobsite, our site supervisor will conduct a health and safety survey of the work area before the start of each shift. The results of this evaluation will be communicated to our work crews through a 11 tailgate safety 11 meeting in which all assembled employees are formerlly presented with the survey findings and are, in turn, encouraged to contribute their own observations on hazards present and appropriate work controls. A tailgate safety form will be used to document these sessions.
3.0 HAZARD EVALUATION AND CONTROLS
The ambient air within the jobsite will be periodically tested with a combustible gas indicator in order to assess the fire and explosion hazard posed by the methane gas. Measured combustible gas concentrations that exceed 10% of the instrument's calibrated lower explosive limit will result in the SIX:0827-AppA A-2
r I
~ i
il
L '
[J
li
'I
L j
li
[]
[ j
~~
[ I
ll
L
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
suspension of all work activities until the gas levels can be safely reduced.
Hydrogen sulfide gas concentrations will also be measured periodically with a direct reading Draeger Tube air sampling kit. If hydrogen sulfide levels in excess of 10 ppm are detected, then mechanically induced dilution ventilation or air-supplied respiratory equipment will be used to eliminate harmful inhalation exposure.
4.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE CONTROLS
In conjunction with the environmental control discussed above, personal protective equipment wi 11 be used by our personnel during certain phases of the work. The selection of appropriate protective equipment will be based on the type and degree of exposure hazard present and the nature of work activity assigned to our Site personnel. In general, the following protective clothing will be worn by all Site personnel who must handle or contact contaminated soil or water in the course of their work:
• Polyethylene coated Tyvek coveralls
• Hard hat and safety glasses
• PVC boots and gloves
Since it will not be possible to attenuate the high noise output of the drilling equipment, all crewman working around the drill rig will be required to wear hearing protection. And, a 1 so, if it is apparent that a nuisance airborne dust hazard is a problem in work area, disposable paper dust respirators (3M #8710 brand) will be worn.
The selection of appropriate protective equipment will be made by IT Corporation•s resident industrial hygienist. And all personnel who must wear this equipment will be instructed in its proper use.
SIX:0827-AppA A-3
' !
-,
I
I
II
~ I
[]
i)
l J
: I
' '
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
5.0 CONCLUSION
The hazard evaluation and control strategies discussed in this plan are intended to control the accident and injury risks associated with this drilling project in order to ensure that all work can be conducted in a safe and healthful manner. IT Corporation will make available its health and safety staff to support our geotechnical activities at the Site and institute other control measures that may become appropriate as work progresses.
SIX:0827-AppA . A-4
PRELIMINARY REPORT
SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST
MARKET PLACE SANITARY LANDFILL
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
Project No. 240827
PREPARED FOR
Bixby Ranch Company
3010 Old Ranch Road, Suite 100
Seal Beach, California 90740
PREPARED BY
IT Corporation
17461 Derian Avenue, Suite 190
Irvine, California 92714
June 1989
'
\ -
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
LIST OF TABLES ................................................. iv LIST OF FIGURES . • . . . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . • v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................. vi
1.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS......................................... 1-1
1.1 EFFECTS AND POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF SURFACE WATER
AND GROUND WATER ON THE WASTE SITE AND OF THE SITE ON
SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER.......................... 1-1
1.1.1 Effect of Surface Water on Landfill.............. 1-2
1.1.2 Effect of Ground Water on Landfill............... 1-2
1.1.3 Effect of Landfill on Surface Water.............. 1-2
1.1.4 Effect of the Landfill on Ground Water........... 1-3
1.2 SITE TOPOGRAPHY......................................... 1-3
1.3 GEOLOGY ••••••••••••.••••.•••••••••••••••••••..••••••••.• · 1.3.1 General Description .•...•..............•...••....
1.3.2 Geologic Map and Cross-Sections ••••.•••• ~ .•••••• ~
1.3.3 Natural Geologic Materials Beneath Waste Site .••• 1-4
1-4
1-4
1-5
1.3.3.1 Recent Alluvial Sediments............... 1-5
1.3.3.2 Pleistocene Sediments................... 1-5
1.3.4 Geologic Structure~······························ 1-5
1.4 HYDROGEOLOGY •..••....•• ~................................ l-6
1.4.1 Water-Bearing Characteristics.~.................. 1-7
1.4.1.1 Permeability of Geologic Materials
Immediately Underlying the Landfill..... 1~7
1.4.2 Direction of Ground-Water Movement •••••.••••..•. ~ 1-8
1.4.3 Location of Springs ..•••.•••••••. ~............... 1-9
1.5 LAND AND WATER USE ..••••..•..•••.•••.•.••.•• ~........... 1-9
1.5.1 Locations of Water Wells in the Vicinity
of the Site...................................... 1-9
1.5.1.1 Water Well Information.................. 1-9
1.5.2 Locations of Oil and Gas Well~ in the
Vicinity of the Site •••••••.•••.••.•.••.•.•••.••• · 1-9 i
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
{Continued)
PAGE
1.5.2.1 Oil and Gas Well Information............ 1-9
1.5.3 Current and Anticipated Land Use................. 1-10
1.5.4 Current and Anticipated Ground-Water Use......... 1-10
1.5.4.1 Current Use............................. 1-10
1.5.4.2 Anticipated Use .• ~······················ 1-10
2.0 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS........................................ 2-1
2.1 WASTE TYPES AND DISPOSAL METHODS ••••• ~.................. 2-1
2.1.1 Waste Types and Concentrations................... 2-1
2.1.2 Disposal Methods................................. 2-2
2.2 HAZARDOUS WASTE CHARACTERIZATION AND GENERATORS ••••••.•.
3.0 SOLID WASTE ASSESSM~NT TEST SUMMARY ••••••.•••••••.•.••••••• ~.
3.1 WATER QUALITY AND SOIL CHEMISTRY IN THE
VICINITY OF THE LANDFILL •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.
3.1.1 General Chemistry •.•.•.....................•.•... 2-2
3-1
3-1
3-1
3.1.2 Anions........................................... 3-2 3 .1. 3 Meta 1 s . ............. : ............ ~ ............... ~ 3·-3
3.1.4 EPA Priority Organic Pollutants.................. 3-6
3.2 STIFF DIAGRAMS AND AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION............. 3-8.
3.3 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SWAT MONITORING WELLS....... 3-9
4.0 AIR-QUALITY SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT ••••••••••••••••••• ~....... 4-1
4.1 AIR-QUALITY SWAT SUMMARY................................ 4-1
4.2 GAS MIGRATION ..••••••••••••••.•••••• ~................... 4-1
5.0 PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS...................................... 5-1
5.1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN LANDFILL......................... 5-1
5.2 LEAKAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.......................... 5-1
5.3 MIGRATING GASES......................................... 5-l
5.4 REMEDIAL MEASURES •••••••.•.•••.••.•••••••••....•.••••• ~. 5-2 SIX:0827R3toc i i
\
'
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
PAGE
6.0 CERTIFICATION................................................ 6-1
6.1 CERTIFIER
1 S NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER................ 6-1
6.2 CERTIFIER
1 S QUALIFICATIONS.............................. 6-1
6.3 STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION.............................. 6-1
REFERENCES
TABLES
FIGURES
APPENDIX A - DRILLING, SAMPLE COLLECTION, AND WELL INSTALLATION
PROCEDURES
APPENDIX 8 - SAMPLE HANDLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
APPENDIX C - CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS
APPENDIX D - SWAT PROPOSAL
APPENDIX E - BORING LOGS
( APPENDIX F - DATA ON WATER WELLS WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE
APPENDIX G - DATA ON OIL AND GAS WELLS IN THE VICINITY OF
THE SITE
APPENDIX H - CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY
CONTROL BOARD
APPENDIX I - AIR-QUALITY SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST WORKPLAN SIX:0827R3toc ; i;
TABLE NO.
1 2
3 4
5 SIX:0827R3toc
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
LIST OF TABLES
TITLE
Summary of Vadose Zone Soil Analyses
Summary of Ground Water Analyses
First Quarter Sampling (10/19/88)
Summary of Ground Water Analyses
Second Quarter Sampling {01/31/89)
Site Monitoring Well Information
(First Quarter Sampling 10/19/88)
Site Monitoring Well Information
(Second Quarter Sampling (01/31/89)
iv
' '
·~
\
\
FIGURE NO.
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 SIX:0827R3toc·
INTERN.Al'IONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
LIST OF FIGURES
TITLE
Topographic Map
Detailed Topographic Map
Surface-Water Flow Direction
Approximate Depths of Refuse
Regional Geologic Map
Cros~-Section Location Map
Cross-Sections A-A', 8-8', and C-C'
Ground Water Elevation Contour Map
for October 19, 1988
Ground Water Elevation Contour Map
for January 31, 1989 ·
Water Wells Within One Mile of the
Market Place Landfill
Oil and Gas Well Location Map
Zoning Map
Stiff Diagrams
v
··----,
!
')
)
I . __ /
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This preliminary report of the Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) of the Market Place Sanitary Landfill was prepared in response to the provisions of the California Water Code, Section 13273, as amended. It was prepared for the Bixby Ranch Company (Bixby Ranch) by IT c·orporation (IT).
The preliminary SWAT was conducted in accoraance with the SWAT proposal submitted to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region {Board) in June, 1988 and approved by the Board on August 17, 1988.
The outline of the report follows the outline given in the 11 Draft Revised SWAT Program Guidance11 issued by the Board on October 10, 1986.
The preliminary SWAT results indicate the following:
• Surface water is directed to engineered drainage structures in the northern portion of the site. The southern portion is covered with dirt and graded such that surface water is directed off the site. • Five ground-water monitoring wells were installed at the site {MP-1 through MP-5).
• Ground water is in contact with the base of the landfill. • Ground water is tidally influenced and flows to the northeast and southeast with the tide at a gradient of approximately 0.3 degrees. • The geology and hydrogeology in the vicinity of the site is complex. The subsurface structure is a northwest-striking, faulted anticlinal fold. This feature has been eroded by the ancestral San Gabri e 1 River. The. eroded gap formed by the river has been fi 11 ed with Recent alluvial sediments.
• A number of ground water wells are located in the vicinity of the site. Many of these wells are placed to control and monitor the inland migration of sea water. They are part of the Alamitos Barrier Project.
• Several active and inactive oil wells are located around the site.
There may be an abandoned oil well and abandoned dry hole located within the landfill boundary.
SIX:0827R3ex vi
-~ I .,
I
\
I
"
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
• Land in the vicinity of the site is zoned for residential, commercial, and industrial use. The property northeast of the site contains an oil field with operating wells.
• The landfill accepted residential, commercial, and demolition wastes. Drums cant a i ni ng rotary drilling muds may have been dumped at the site.
• Water samples collected from monitoring wells show values for general chemistry (pH, electrical conductivity, and total dissolved solids) typical of saline water (diluted sea water).
• Vadose zone samples were analyzed for U.S. EPA and CAM priority pollutant metals using the U.S. EPA WET extraction procedure. All concentrations of meta 1 s were be 1 ow the estab 1 i shed STLC and TTLC values.
• High concentration of benzene were detected in water from well MP-3. The source of the benzene contamination is likely from off- site. Severa 1 other organic compounds were detected in 1 ow to moderate concentrations (below drinking water standards). • The air-quality SWAT has not been completed for the Market Place Landfi 11.
• Based on the analytical results of the soil and the first two ground water samplings, conclusions regarding the leakage and migration of hazardous substances cannot be made until the quarterly ground water samp 1 i ng_ program is camp 1 eted. -
SIX:0827R3ex vii
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLoGY CORPORATION
1.0 SITE CHARACTERISTICS
This section addresses the site characteristics of the Market Place Landfill (Figure 1). It includes: (1) a discussion of the effects of surface water and ground water on the waste site and, conversely, of the effects of the site on surface water and ground water; (2) a topographic map of the disposal site and surrounding region within 1 mile of the site and a detailed topographic map of the site itself; (3) a description of the ·geology and hydrogeology of the disposal site an.d surrounding region; and {4) a discussion of the land and water use in the vicinity of the site.
1.1 EFFECTS AND POTENTIAL EFFECTS OF SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER ON THE
WASTE SITE AND OF THE SITE ON SURFACE WATER AND GROUND WATER The effects and potential effects of surface water and ground water on the Market Place Landfi 11 and the effects of the 1 andfi 11 on. surface water and ground water were investigated. Tlie investigation included a literature and document review, field examination of surface features and characteristics, ) the drilling of boreholes, the collection and analysis of geologic materials from the boreholes, the installation of monitoring wells, and the collection and analysis of ground water from the wells to determine water quality at the 1 andfi ll.
)
A ground water testing and monitoring program was designed and implemented based on preliminary assumptions of the geology and hydrogeology of the landfill site. Five boreholes (MP-1 through MP-5) were drilled, all ~f which were completed as monitoring wells. Four additional boreholes, numbered MP-1A through MP-4A,. were drilled adjacent to the wells in order· to collect vadose zone samples. The vadose zone soil samples collected from boreholes MP-1 through MP-4 were not analyzed by the 1 aboratory as a resu 1 t of a mi scom munication at the laboratory, which resulted in exceeding the sample holding times.
SIX:0827R3 1-1
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
,~--
~ Monitoring well MP-5 was drilled ~nd installed at a later date than wells MP-1 ,- ·.
)
through MP-4, after it was discovered that a preexisting well (IT-1) had been damaged and could not be utilized as a monitoring well.
Drilling, sample collection, ~nd well installation procedures are described in Appendix A. Sample-handling and analytical procedures are described in Appen dix B. Analytical results of soil and water samples collected are d1scussed in Section 3.0. Certificates of analyses are enclosed in Append.ix C. The SWAT proposal is presented in Appendix D. Boring logs are presented in Appen dix E.
1.1.1 Effect of Surface Water on Landfill
Soil cover protects the surface of the landfill from the effects of precipi tation. The southern portion of the site (undeveloped portion) borders the San Gabri e 1 River and contains an earthen/rock 1 evee designed to prevent flooding of the river channel. The northern. portion of the landfill is covered by an asphalt-paved parking lot and an office building. Surface~water runoff flows to engineered drainage structures and ultimately reaches storm drains, which lead to the ocean (Figure 3).
1.1.2 Effect of Ground Water on Landfill
Ground water was encountered beneath the perimeter of the landfill at approxi mate depths of 6 to 14 feet below ground surface. Based on historical data, refuse was disposed in trenches excavated below the ground-water table. Data collected during previous investigations at the site by several consultants and by IT Corporation (IT, 1987) indicate that refuse exists to approximately 30 feet below· grade in two areas at the landfill.
approximate depths of refuse throughout the site.
1.1.3 Effect of Landfill on Surface Water
Figure 4 shows the
Runoff from precipitation onto the northern part of the site (developed portion) is controlled by the presence of asphalt pavement and buildings, SIX:0827R3 1-2
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
,-~
(
\ which divert the runoff 1nto storm drains. The southern part of the site /"-
)
(undeveloped portion) does not contain structures that control runoff.
However, this portion of the site has been covered and graded so that precipitation onto it is diverted away from the site.
Due to the uncertain and intermittent nature of precipitation in this area, a surface-water runoff sample has not been collected at this time. However, upon further evaluation of data obtained since IT prepared the surface water monitoring workplan dated August 30, 1988, IT believes that collecting a surface water runoff sample from the proposed location, along the northeastern side of the landfill, is not necessary, because monitoring well MP-2 is located in the same location and depth to ground water is only about 7 feet.
Because of the shallow depth to ground-water in this area, any surface water which may pond in this area will probably infiltrate the soil and should be detected in the ground water samples collected from well MP-2. Therefore, IT requests that this site be exempted from surface water sampling requirements.
1.1.4 Effect of the Landfill on Ground Water
Portions of the landfill extend below the ground-water table and may have an impact on ground-water quality. Analytical results from the first two quarterly samplings indicate that several volatile organic compounds are in the ground water. Conclusions as to the possible source and magnitude of the detected organic constituents will be made after completion of the quarterly sampling of the monitoring wells.
1.2 SITE TOPOGRAPHY
A topographic ~ap of the site and surrounding area is i~cluded as Figure 1. A detailed topographic map of the landfill is included as Figure 2.
The site is located in an area which has been reclaimed from a tidal marsh land/floodplain by landfilling and channel lining. Immediately south of the site lies the rock-lined channel of the San Gabri.el River. The surrounding SIX:0827R3 1-3
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
topography is generally flat with elevations less than 15 feet above sea level. Two gently sloping terraces, one to the north (Bixby Ranch Hill) and the other to the southeast (Landing Hill), are located within 1.5 miles of the site. Elevations across the site range from about 10 to 16 feet above sea level.
1.3 GEOLOGY
1.3.1 General Description
The site is located within the Alamitos Gap, an area of sea-water intrusion.
The gap is an alluvial-filled, southwesterly trending feature which transects the northwesterly trending Newport-Inglewood Uplift and Fault zone (Seal Beach Fault segment). The banks of the gap, Bixby Ranch Hill and Landing Hill, are the erosional remnants of an eroded anticlinal fold, which locally is the surface.expression of the Newport-Inglewood Uplift (Figure 5). ··The fold is comprised of Pleistocene and older sediments, which include the principal regional aquifers locally known as the C, 8, A, and I zones.l
1.3.2 Geologic Map and Cross-Sections
A regional geologic map is included as Figure 5. A cross-section location map and geologic cross-section map (A-A
1 through C-C
1 ) are included as Figures 6
and 7, respectively.
The cross-sections were located to best portray geologic features relevant to the site, utilize geologic ~ata from borings drilled by IT Corporation on an adjacent property, and to illustrate the results of drilling performed during the project.
1 Lunden, E. W., J. Roth, 1976, 11 Engineering .Geology Report, Alamitos .
Barrier Project, 11 Los Angeles County Flood Control District, Mat.erials Engineering Division, 14 pp.
SIX:0827R3 1-4
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
The boring logs of the SWAT monitoring wells, the borings drilled by IT Corporation on an adjacent property (IT, 1988a), monitoring well construction details, and a well legend summary are included in Appendix E.
1.3.3 Natural Geologic Materials Beneath Waste Site
The landfill is underlain by Recent alluvial sediments, which overlie Pleisto cene marine sediments. The Recent alluvial sediments in the vicinity of the site extend to a depth of approximately 40 feet below ground surface.
Pleistocene marine sediments were not encountered during the SWAT investiga tion. However, these sediments were encountered during an investigation by IT Corporation (IT, 1988a) of an adjacent property. The scope of the study was to determine the location of the Se.al Beach Fault and determine engineering properties for the soils at the s·ite. Data collected from the investigation were extrapolated to estimate the subsurface geologic environment of the Market Place site.
1.3.3.1 Recent Alluvial Sediments
The Recent alluvium at the site consists of approximately 45 feet of inter bedded silts and clays with occasional lenses or zones of silty fine-grained sand~ The clays are of low to high plasticity and contain occasional organic (plant) material.
Underlying the clays ~nd silts are 25 to 60 feet of very ur·-'msolidated, wet, silty sand and fine- to medium-grained sand. These materials were penetrated by borings on .an adjacent property (IT, 1988a) and not by the SWAT monitoring wells. This saturated zone is termed the 11 R-Zone11 aquifer by Zielbauer and others (1961) and Lundeen and Roth (1916).
1.3.3.2 Pleistocene Sediments
Pleistocene sediments were not encountered by any of SWAT monitoring we 11 s.
However, Pleistocene sediments were encountered by borings drilled in an SIX:0827R3 1-5
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
adjacent property by IT Corporation (IT,1988a}. Borings drilled east of the Seal Beach Fault penetrated moist, very dense, very fine-grained silty sands and sandy silts (Figure 6). The sands are generally massive and contain prominent shell (bivalve, gastropod} horizons (IT, 1988a). This zone is considered to correlate with the Upper Pleistocene aquiclude unit of Zielbauer and others (1961) and Lundeen and Roth (1976}.
Borings drilled west of the fault encountered saturated, loose to dense,· fine to coarse grained sands and scattered gravels. This zone appears to correlate with the Pleistocene 11 A-Zone11 • aquifer of Zielbauer and others (1961) and Lundeen and Roth (1976).
1.3.4 Geologic Structure
The Alamitos Gap, as described earlier, is an eroded northwest-striking anticlinal fold. The gap has been filled with Recent alluvial sediments by the ancestral San Gabriel River. The Seal Beach Fault lies south of the fold axis and is essentially parallel to it.
The Recent all uvi urn in the area is generally flat lying and has not been affected by movement along the Seal Beach Fault (Lundeen and Roth, 1976).
However, the Pleistocene sediments have been affected by fault activity.
Horizontal and vertical movements along the fault have resulted in dissimilar lithologies and moisture contents on either side of the fault (IT, 1988a) (Figure 7).
1.4 HYDROGEOLOGY
·This section presents a discussion of the hydrogeology in the vicinity of the landfill. It includes the water-bearing characteristics and permeabilities of the geologic materials encountered beneath the landfill and the direction of ground-water movement.
SIX:0827R3 1-6
' /
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
·The hydrogeology in the vicinity of the site is complex. In response to a request by the RWQCB to identify the presence of multiple aquifers beneath the site, a diligent effort was made to describe, in detail, the hydrogeology at and in the vicinity of the site. All known and available publications, well logs, and reports have been thoroughly considered in the following discussion.
1.4.1 Water-Bearing Characteristics
The site lies within an area of sea water intrusion. The Recent alluvial sediments are in direct communication with sea water and act as a conduit for inland migration of saline water (Zielbauer and others, 1961). Two additional important conduits for the inland migration of sea water are the Los Cerritos Channel and the San Gabriel River because of their direct contact with the ocean.
The Recent a 11 uv i urn consists predominant 1 y of interbedded s i lt s and c 1 ays.
Portions of this unit contain sandy silt to silty sand. Underlying the silts and clays are very unconsolidated silty sands and- very fine-:grained sands believed to be the 11 R-Zone 11 by Lundeen and Roth ( 1976). The 11 R-Zone 11 is saturated as observed by IT in borings drilled in an adjacent property (IT, 1988a).
Beneath the Recent alluvium are coarser-grained Pleistocene sediments believed to be the 11 A-Zone11 aquifer termed by Lunden and Roth (1976). Based on the lithologies encountered during an i~vestigation bY IT in 1988 (IT, 1988a) of an adjacent property, the Recent 11 R-Zone11 and Pleistocene 11 A-Zone11 appear to be in direct contact with each other. No evidence of an aquiclude between the units was noted (IT, 1988a).
1.4.1.1 Permeability of Geologic Materials Immediately Underlying the Landfill The materials which comprise the Recent alluvium_ are of variable perme ~bilities. This material can be divided into two units: (1) low permeability interbedded clays. and silts and (2) moderately permeable silty sand and SIX:0827R3 1-7
I
I
\
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
sand. The five SWAT monitoring wells (MP-1 through MP-5) are completed in the low permeability interbedded clays and silts (Figure 7 and Appendix E).
During the drilling, purging, and sampling of the wells, ground water was observed to recharge very slowly in each well. The abundant clay and silt content of this zone accounts for its low permeability.
Underlying the clays and silts are silty sands and fine-grained sands (Figure 7). As stated previously, these materials were not encountered during the SWAT investigation but were encountered in borings drilled northeast of the site (Figure 6). This unit, termed the 11 R-Zone11 aquifer by Zielbauer and others (1961) is saturated and very unconsolidated based on observations during the drilling of borings in the adjacent property.
Immediately beneath the 11 R-Zone11 is the Pleistocene 11 A-Zone11 (IT, 1988a) (Zielbauer and others, 1961). This unit is denser than the overlying 11 R-Zone11 , contains fine to coarse sand with a small percentage of interstitial clay and silt, and is wet (IT, 1988).
Based on the above data, it appears that the low permeable clays and silts, and the 11 R-Zone11 and the 11 A-Zone11 are in hydraulic continuity in the vicinity of the site.
1.4.2 Direction of Ground-Water Movement
Figure 8 is a ground-water elevation contour map for data ~ollected during the first quarter sampling (10/19/88). Ground water beneath the landfill appears to be flowing- in a northeast direction. The hydraulic gradient is approxi mately 1-foot per 180 feet (0.32 degrees).
Figure 9 is a ground-water elevation contour map for data collected during the second quarter sampling (01/31/89). · Ground water beneath the landfill appears to be ·~lowing in an east to southeast direction (approximately sao clockwise SIX:0827R3 1-8
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
from the 10/19/88 measurements). The hydraulic gradient is approximately 1-foot per 210 feet (0.27 degrees).
The change in ground-water gradient between. these two dates, appears to confirm our belief that the ground-water in this area is tidally influenced.
1.4.3 Location of Springs
No springs occur within 1 mile of the landfill~·
1.5. LAND AND WATER USE
1.5.1 Locations of Water Wells in the Vicinity of the Site A map showing locations of water wells within 1 mile of the site is included as Figure 10.
1.5.1.1 Water Well Information
General information pertaining to the wells shown in Figure 10 are contained ) in Appendix F.
1.5.2 Locations of Oil and Gas Wells in the Vicinity of the Site A map showing the locations of oil and gas wells in the vicinity of the site is included as Figure 11. Based on this map, one abandoned dry hole and one abandoned oil well may be located at the site. The method of abandonment is not known at this time. Available information on the dry hole and abandoned well will be included in the final report.
1.5.2.1 Oil and Gas Well Information
Information pertaining to the wells shown on Figure 11 is contained in Appendix G. The data listed are for all wells drilled in the Seal Beach Oil Field, of which the Market Place site occupies a small portion. The information is from Petroleum Information® Corporation.
SIX:0827R3 1-9
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
,"\ I I
/ 1.5.3 Current and Anticipated Land Use
' j
Land in the vicinity of the site is zoned primarily for commercial, open space, and residential purposes. Figure 12 shows zoning information for the land within 1 mile of the site.
1.5.4 Current and Anticipated Ground-Water Use
1.5.4.1 Current Use
Ground water in the vicinity of the site is generally saline and not used as a potable water source. Many wells around the site are used to monitor and control the inland migration of sea water. These wells include observation, injection, and pumping wells. Several irrigation, industrial, and domestic wells are also located in the area.
1.5.4.2 Anticipated Use
Information on the anticipated ground-water use in the area is not available.
SIX:0827R3 1-10
. )
\. . ./
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
2.0 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS
2.1 WASTE TYPES AND DISPOSAL METHODS
· 2.1.1 Waste Types and Concentrations
The landfill is classified as a closed Class III (old Class II) sanitary landfill, pursuant to Title 23, Chapter 3, Su.bchapter 15 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR). According to the Industrial Waste Disposal Permit for the site, the following types of waste were acceptable for disposal at the site:
• Non-water soluble, non-decomposable inert solids, including steel mill slag, and asbestos fiber and products therefrom
• Ordinary household and commercial refuse, including small quantities of noxious materials in mixed loads of rubbish, cold ashes received in mixed loads of rubbish, dry mud cake from oil field sumps, paint sludge received from water circulated paint sp.ray booths not trans ported in vacuum tanks, oil soaked excelsior or straw used to absorb hydrocarbon oils fr.om waste water, residue and grit from separation chambers from the Hyperi on s 1 udge p 1 ant, paint in drums from which the major portion of liquids have been removed
• Garbage and market refuse.
·Additionally, ash residue resulting from a fire at the site, which lasted approximately 6 days (October 26, 1961 to October 31, 1961), was landfilled in. the southern portion of the site.
During its operation, the site acce.pted waste from the· following clients:
City of Long B~ach, B-Z Disposal Service, J and S Disposal Company (servicing the City of Lakewood), the Veteran•s Administration Hospital, the Lqs Angeles County Flood Control District, and the general public. Each individual client was charged a fee for use of the landfill.
SIX:0827R3
)
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
2.1.2 Disposal Methods
According to available historical information, a combination trench and area method was used to dispose of the waste. Trenches were excavated with a drag 1 ine up to a depth of approximately 30 feet below grade. Refuse was then disposed in the trenches and covered with soil. Figure 4 shows the approxi mate depths of refuse across the site.
2.2 HAZARDOUS WASTE CHARACTERIZATION AND GENERATORS
Hi'storical records indicate that barrels, possibly containing ro_tary drilling mud, may have been disposed of at the landfill. From the Industrial Waste Disposal Permit, it is unclear whether liquids and semi-liquids were allowed to be disposed of at the landfill.
A site characterization study was performed by IT in March and April 1987 (IT, 1987). The purpose of this study was to assess the southern portion (undeveloped portion) of the Market Place landfill to determine if potentially hazardous substances were present in hazardous concentrations. Soi 1 borings were drilled within and adjacent to this portion of the landfill. One ground water monitoring well was installed within the landfill and another was installed outside of the refuse boundary along the southern corner of the site.
Soil, refuse, and ground-water samples were collected and analyzed for volatile and semi-volatile organics, pesticides, aroclors, cyanide, phenols and various metals and semi-metals. Samples collected from within the refuse contained lead in slightly hazardous concentrati.ons. No other potentially hazardous substances were found in hazardous concentrations in the refuse.
SIX:0827R3 2-2
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
3.0 SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST SUMMARY
Various correspondence with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, regarding the specific requirements for completing the SWAT investigation for the Market Place Landfill have been included in Appendix H.
3.1 WATER QUALITY AND SOIL CHEMISTRY IN THE VICINITY OF THE LANDFILL Based on an evaluation of the direction of ground-water flow at the site from data collected during the first and second quarter samplfngs, the wells appear to be placed to adequately assess possible contaminant migration from the landfill. True upgradient and downgradient monitoring points cannot be established at this time, because ground-water flow directions in the area are known to vary as a result of daily and seasonal tidal fluctuations.
Soil samples collected from borings MP-lA through MP-4A and MP-5 provide ) geochemical data for the soils immediately around the landfill. /
Tables 1, 2, and 3 summarize the results of chemical analyses performed on the soil and water samples collected from wells MP-1 through MP-5 and borings MP-1A through MP-4A. Drinking water action levels established by the California Department of Health Services (DHS) have been included in Tables 2 and 3 for comparison. The total and soluble threshold limit concentrations (TTLC and STLC, respectively) for various parameters have been included in Tab 1 e 1. ·.
3.1.1 General-Chemistry
Water samples collected from wells MP-1 through MP-5 were analyzed for the various parameters listed in Table 2.
The pH of water in the five wells (7.3 to 7.6) is slightly lower than the typical pH of sea water (8.1).
SIX:0827R3 3-1
' _)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Electricity conductivity (EC) in the five wells range from 22,000 to 108,000 ~mhos/em, which by definition is saline (Hem, 1983).
Chemical oxygen demand (COD) is similar in wells !'1P-1, MP-2, and MP-3, but substantially higher in MP-4 during the first quarter. The results are shown below:
WELL EC ·. COD
NUMBER QH (~mhos[cm} (mg[2.}
MP-1 7.6 61,600 25
MP-2 7.3 108,000 35
MP-3 7.4 68,800 25
MP-4 7.4 22,000 185
The results for the second quarter sampling are summarized be low: ·.
WELL EC coo
NUMBER pH (~mhos/em} (mg/2.}
MP-1 7.4 27,300 100
MP-2 7.4 95,900 <50
MP-3 7.4 65,400 <50
MP-4 .7.4 23,000 100
MP-5 7.4 23,000 50
COD measurements provide a means of evaluating the pollutant load on a water sample. The elevated COO in MP-1, MP-4, and MP-5 may indicate the presence of landfill leachate in the ground water.
3.1.2 Anions
Concentratiqns of the anions chloride, sulfate, nitrate, phosphate (total phosphate), hydroxide, and carbonate were determined for all well water samp 1 es. Hydroxide and carbonate were not detected in any of the water samples. The results for the first quarter are tabulated below:
SIX:0827R3 3-2
'
·. )
'. ~
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
PHOSPHATE
(Total
WELL CHLORIDE SULFATE Nitrate Phosphorus)·
NUMBER (mg/.2,} (mg/2-} (mgL2-} (mgL2-}
MP-1 23,000 3,420 250 40
MP-2 50,500 8,700 330 56
MP-3 27,000 1,430 320 18
MP-4 6,800. 1,870 230 32
The results for the second quarter sampling are summarized below:
PHOSPHATE
(TOTAL
WELL CHLORIDE SULFATE NITRATE PHOSPHORUS)
NUMBER {mgL2-} {mg/2-) (mg/2-) . (mgL2-}
MP-1 9,000 2,200 53 2.8
MP-2 41,000 10,500 132 1.4
MP-3 36,000 2,400 27 0.7
MP-4 · 6,900 1,815 41 1.4
MP-5 7,000 1,240 41 5.6
There was a large reduction in chloride in MP-1 from the first to second quarter sampling. Slight increases or decreases in concentration of the other parameters were noted in the other wells.
Soil samples collected from the vadose zone were also analyzed for various anions (Table 1). The observed concentrations of the anions appear to be normal for this type of geologic environment.
3.1.3 Metals
The water samples were analyzed for the alkali metals, calcium, magnesium, sodium, and potassium. The results for the first quarter sampling are as follows:
SIX:0827R3 3-3
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
WELL CALCIUM. MAGNESIUM SODIUM POTASSIUM
NUMBER {mg{2.} (mgL2.} (mgL2.} (mg/2.}
MP-1 425 1,500 14,000 575
MP-2 780 3,200 31,000 275.
MP-3 355 1,750 15,800 515
MP-4 850 340 4,600 200
The results for the second quarter sampling are summarized below:
MAGNESIUM
WELL CALCIUM (CALCULATED) SODIUM POTASSIUM
NUMBER (mg/2.) (mgL2.} (mg/2.) (mgL2.)
MP-1· 230 655 5,800 214
MP-2 760 1,020 30,500 860
MP-3 410 3,845 18,000 450
MP-4 290 530 4,600 190
MP-5 ·. 140 219 4,900 210
The water samples were also analyzed for EPA and CAM priority pollutant ) metals. The first quarter sampling results for detected constituents are as follows:
MAXIMUM
CONTAMINANT LEVEL
DETECTED WELL CONCENTRATION FOR DRINKING WATER
ANALYTE NUMBER (mg/2.} (mg/2.}
Antimony (Sb) MP-1 1.0 NE
Barium (Ba) MP-3 2.8 1
Cobalt (Co) MP-2 0.06 NE
Copper (Cu) MP-1 0.06 1.0
MP-2 0.1 1.0
MP-3 0.08 1.0
MP-4 0.2 1.0
Iron (Fe) MP-2 0.05 0.3
MP-3 0.2 0.3
MP-4 0.04 0.3
Manganese (Mn) MP-1 1.8 0.05
MP-2 2.8 0.05
MP-3 3.0 0.05
MP-4 1.8 0.05
Nickel (Ni) MP-3 0.05 NE
SIX:0827R3 3-4
/
)
Thallium (Ti) MP-1
MP-2
MP-.3
MP-4
Zinc (Zn) MP-4
NE = Not Established
0.6 1.5
0.8 0.2
0.05 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
7.0 7.0
7.0 7.0
.5.0
' '
The second quarter sampling results for detected constituents are shown below:
MAXIMUM
CONTAMINANT LEVEL
DETECTED WELL CONCENTRATION FOR DRINKING WATER
ANALYTE NUMBER (mg[2.} (mg[2.}
Arsenic (As) MP-1 0.01 0.03
Cobalt (Co) MP-1 0.01 NE
MP-2 0.1 NE
MP-3 0.02 NE
Copper (Cu) MP-1 0.03 NE
MP-2 0.15 NE
MP-3 0.06 NE
MP-4 0.03 NE
MP-5 . 0.02 NE
Lead (Pb) MP-2 0.2 0.03
Manganese (Mo) MP-1 0.66 NE
MP-2 2.0 NE
MP-3 0.95 NE
MP-4 2.0 NE
MP-5 0.4 NE
Molybdenum (Mn) MP-3 0.4 NE
MP-4 0.1 NE
MP-5 0.1 NE
Nickel (Ni) MP-1 0.01 NE
MP-2 0.2 NE
MP-3 0.02 NE
MP-4 0.02 NE
Thanium (Tl) MP-1 0.2 NE
MP-2 2.0 NE
MP-3 0.3 NE
MP-4 0.1 NE
MP-5 0.1 NE
Zinc MP-1 0.02 NE
MP-2 0.05 NE
MP-3 0.01 NE
MP-4 0.01 NE
MP-5 0.02 NE
SIX:0827R3 3-5
)
.•
1 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Maximum contaminant levels for some analytes have not been established (NE).
Samples of geologic materials from the vadose zone were analyzed for the same metals following the California WET test procedure. Concentration of the metals fell within normal ranges for the types of soils found in the area.
3.1.4 EPA Priority Organic Pollutants
Wate: samples were analyzed by EPA Methods 502.2 and. 625. EPA Method 502.2 has a lower detection limit than that of Method 624 (method proposed in SWAT proposal) and includes all the analytes listed in Method 624 plus several other organic compounds.
Methods 8010 and 8020.
samples are listed below:
DETECTED
Vadose zone samples were analyzed by modified EPA
The results for detected analytes in water and soi 1
WATER SAMPLES
·MAXIMUM
CONTAMINANT LEVEL
WELL SAMPLING CONCENTRATION FOR DRINKING WATER
ANALYTE NUMBER EVENT {Qtr.) {ug[l} (].lg[9.)
Bis (2-ethylhexyl
phthalate) MP-3 1 30 NE
MP-2 2 8.5 NE
MP-3 2 21 NE
Di-n-octylphthalate MP-3 1 66 NE
Methyl . isobutyl
ketone MP-1 1 7.4 NE
MP-2 1 13.4 NE
MP-3 1 26 NE
Methyl ethyJ ketone MP-2 1 9.4 1,770
MP-3 1 8.4 1,770
MP-1 2 4_2 1,770
Acetone MP-1 1 3.9 NE
MP-3 1 2.0 NE
MP-1 2 98 NE
Benzene MP-3 1 800 0.7
MP-3 2 220 0.7
Ethyl benzene MP-3 1 100 680.0
MP-3 2 2-Q 680.0
Toluene MP-3 1 3.1 100.0
MP-3 2 10 100.0
SIX:0827R3 3-6
;
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
MAXIMUM
CONTAMINANT LEVEL
DETECTED WELL SAMPLING CONCENTRATION FOR DRINKING WATER ANALYTE NUMBER EVENT (Qtr.} (ug[.Q.} {flg[.Q.}
Xylene MP-3 2 3.8 620.0
o-BHC MP-3 2 0.33 NE
MP-5 2 0.06 NE
a.-BHC MP-2 2 0.03 0.70
MP-3 2 0.04 0.70
MP~5 2 0.02 0.70
y-BHC MP-1 2 0.02 NE
MP-3 2 0.04 NE
4,4'-DDE MP-2 2 0.03 NE
4,4'-DDT MP-3 2 0.04. NE
NE ~ Not Established
Organic compounds detected in water from the wells were below regulatory action levels f6r drinking water, with the exception of 800 flg/.Q. and 220 ~g/1 of benzene detected in well MP-3 during the first and second quarter sampling, respectively.
A 1 so detected in we 11 MP-3 during the first and second quarter samp 1 i ng was ethylbenzene, toluene, xylene. These three compounds; as well as benzene, may be from a reported leaking underground gasoline storage tank at a gasoline station located approximately 1,000 feet northwest of well MP-3 or from a site located west of the landfill.
The two phthalate compounds detected in wells MP-2 and MP-3 may be the result of materials used in the manufacturing of the polyvinyl chloride (PVC). The .wells are composed of PVC casing.
The ketone compounds and acetone detected in water from wells MP-1, MP-2 and MP-3 may be the result of landfill leachate derived from. the natural bio- chemical decomposition· of fats and the degredation of plastics. compounds also may be from petroleum related activities in the area.
SIX:0827R3 3-7
These
)
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
The rema1n1ng organic compounds, o-BHC, a-BHC, y-BHC, 4,4'-DDE, and 4,4'-DDT, are pesticides/insecticides and may be derived from the spraying of foliage in the area.
DETECTED
ANALYTE
Xylene
SOIL SAMPLES
BORING NUMBER AND
SAMPLE DEPTH (ft)
MP-3a (10.0)
CONCENTRATION
(flg/2.)
7.2 The source of xylene detected in soil sample MP-3a is not known. During dri 11 i ng of the boring, a strong organic odor was detected in the cuttings (Appendix E, Boring Log MP-3).
Additional data for organic compounds detected in the ground water and soil samples are listed in Tables 1, 2, and 3.
3~2 STIFF DIAGRAMS AND AQUIFER CHARACTERIZATION
Stiff diagrams provide a means of graphically representing chemical data (Figure 12). The resulting polygon is a shape which is characteristic for the particular water being sampled. The analytical data for each selected cation and anion (expressed in units of milligrams per liter) is converted to milli equivalents per liter. This conversion is achieved by multiplying the milli grams per 1 iter by the reci proca 1 s of the combining atomic weights of the appropriat~ ions.
Stiff diagrams also provide a means of evaluating ground water from different aquifers. The resulting shape is a "finger print" of the ground-water chemistry for :that .aquifer. Modi fi cat i ens to the ground-water chemistry can result from dilution or concentration of specific cations or anions. These modifications may come from mixing of dissimilar waters, lithologic changes -within each aquifer, and modifications from human related activities.
Based on an eval~ation of the stiff diagrams (Figure 12) and the boring logs (Appendix E) it appears that each well is monitoring water from the same SIX:0827R3 3-8
)
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
aquifer. The variations between each stiff diagram may be due to lithologic variations between each well.
It appears that the ground water being monitored at the site is basically the general composition of sea water (Figure 13). The stiff diagrams for ground water at each well are similar to that of the stiff diagram for sea water with concentration or dilution of specific constituents due to the geochemical make-up of the soil penetrated by each well.
To evaluate the basic chemical composition of the ground water at the site, one year of quarterly sampling and analytical data must be collected, reviewed, and plotted. From this information, the average chemical composition of ground water in the area and at each well can be evaluated.
3.3 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SWAT MONITORING WELLS
Five exploratory boreholes, all of which were completed as monitoring wells, were drilled at the site. Well MP-5 was drilled and completed_ at a later date than wells MP-1 through MP-4. The reason for this delay is that, initially, a pre-existing monitoring well installed by lT in 1987 was to be utilized as a monitoring point. During the drilling of MP-1 through MP-4, it was discovered that the pre-existing monitoring well had been covered with soil during grading at the site.· Several attempts were made to locate the well using geophysical methods; however, it was determined that a new monitoring well had to be installed. This well, MP-5, was installed at the end of January 1989 and sampled in February 1989. 1
·Data for the monitoring wells is presented in Tables 4 and 5 and Appendix E.
Four additional borings were drilled, sampled, and backfilled at the site (MP- 1A through MP-4A). MP-1A was drilled adjacent to MP-1, MP-2A next to MP-2, MP-3A adjacent to MP-3, and MP-4A adjacent to MP-4. These a~~itional borings were drilled and sampled because sample holding times for soils collected from· MP-1 through MP-4 were exceeded by the laboratory.
SIX:0827R3 3-9
\ )
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
4.0 AIR-QUALITY SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST
4.1 AIR-QUALITY SWAT SUMMARY
The Air-Quality Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) has not been completed. A work plan has been submitted by SCS Engineers, Inc. to the Air-Quality Management 0 i strict (AQMD) and is awaiting approva 1. A copy of the Air Quality.SWAT work plan wr~tten by SCS Engineers, Inc. is included in Appendix I.
4.2 GAS MIGRATION
Bixby Ranch Company hired Engineering Science, Inc. in 1?76 to investigate gas generation and migration at the site. As a result, a passive trench-vent gas system was installed. The system consists of trench vent pipes, landfill vent pipes, monitoring wells, and a subfloor ventilation system beneath one of the office buildings. As-built drawings for the gas ventilation system are included in Appendix I. No landfill gas has been found to migrate off site since the system has been in operation.
SIX:0827R3 4-1
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
5.0 PRELIMINARV CONCLUSIONS
5.1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN LANDFILL
The Market Place landfill' accepted only nonhazardous materials. Results of soil and refuse samples collected from within the landfill and chemically analyzed during an investigation by IT in 1987 indicate the presence of lead in slightly to moderately hazardous concentrations.
5.2 LEAKAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Analysis of water samples from the SWAT monitoring wells indicate the presence of benzene in well MP-3 above regulatory action levels for drinking. water.
Anomalous concentrations of acetone, two phthalate compounds and of methyl ethyl ketone were also detected (regulatory action levels have not been estab 1 i shed for these substances). A noma 1 ous concentrat i ens of ethyl benzene and toluene, which were below regulatory action levels, were detected in well MP-3. Anomalous concentrations of several organic pesticides/insecticides were detected in wells MP-1, MP-2, MP-3, and MP-5 during the second quarter sampling. A low concentration of lead (0.2 mg/2.) was detected in well MP-2 during the second quarter sampling.
Final conclusions regarding the leakage and migration of hazardous substances cannot be made until the quarterly ground water sampling program is completed. At that time, IT wi.ll present conclusions and recommendations regarding the presence and migration of hazardous substances from· the 1 andfi 11.
5.3 MIGRATING:GASES
A gas ventilation, collection, and monitoring system has been installed at the site (Section 4.2). Information from the Air-Quality SWAT, when completed, will supplement this report.
SIX:0827R3 5-1
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
5.4 REMEDIAL MEASURES
Remedial measures, if any, will be addressed after the quarterly sampling of the monitoring wells is completed.
SIX:0827R3 5-2
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
6.0 CERTIFICATION
This constitutes certificatio"n of the Solid Waste Assessment Test Preliminary Report for the Market Place Sanitary Landfill prepared by IT Corporation for Bixby Ranch Company and submitted to the Ca 1 i forni a Regi ona 1 Water Qua 1 ity Control Board, Los Angeles Region in 1988.
6.1 CERTIFIER1 S NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER
The Market Place SWAT Preliminary Report•s accuracy and completeness have been certified by Fred W. Tahse. Mr. Tahse is a geologist registered with the State of California, Board of Registration for Geologists and Geophysicists.
His license number is 1552, expiration date 06/30/91.
6.2 CERTIFIER•$ QUALIFICATIONS
Mr. Tahse is an employee of IT Corporation and Project Director for the Bixby Ranch Company SWAT program. He received a B.S. in geology in 1953 from Yale University and an M.S. in geology in 1957 from California Institute of Tech nology. He has over 30 years experience in basic geologic studies, oil and gas, mineral exploration projects, and site ,analysis and ch~racterization programs. In the last 10 years, he has managed and participated in numerous geological, hydrogeological, and geophysical programs.
6.3 STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION
I, Fred W. Tahse, certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the data and information presented in this preliminary report are accurate and complete. I further certify that the conclusions and recommendations presented in the report are in accordance with accepted practices and procedures.
SIX:0827R3 6-1
REFERENCES
)
)
REFERENCES
American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Pollution Control Federation, 1975, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, M. C. Rand, A. E. Greenberg, and M. J. Taras, et., 14th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., 1193 pp.
Engineering Science, Inc., 1~76, 11 Report of Gas Migration Investigation, the .
Market Place, Long Beach, California, 11 Job No. 2134.
Harding Lawson Associates, 1986, 11 Hydrogeologic.Investigation, Exxon Service Station 7-3047, Long Beach, California, 11 Job No. 4167, 138.11.
Hem, J. D., 1970, 11 Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics of Natural Water,11 Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1473, Second Edition, 338 pp.
IT Corporation, 19B8a, 11 Bryant Property Fault and Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, 11 Job No. 242100. ·
IT Corporation, 1988b, 11 Addendum-Solid Waste Assessment Test Proposal, Market Place Sanitary Landfill, 11 Job No. 240827·. ·
IT Corporation, 1987, 11 Final Report-Assessment of the Bixby Ranch Company Sanitary Landfi 11 for the Presence of Hazardous Substances, 11 Job No. 240402.
Lundeen, E. W., J. Roth, 1976, 11 Engineering Geology Report, Alamitos Barrier Project, 11 Los Angeles County Flood Control District, Materials Engineering Division, 14 pp.
Moore and Taber, 1987, 11 Geotechnical Investigation-Proposed Studebaker Road Extension, Long Beach, California, 11 Job No. 187-73.
Moore and Taber, 1986,11 Interim Foundation Investigation Report-Proposed Market Place Movie Theater, Long Beach, California, 11 Job No. 186-73.
Moore and Taber, 1986, 11 Interim Foundation Investigation Report - Proposed Office and Restaurant Buildin~s, Market Place Office Park Phase II, Long Beach, Califor!1ia, 11 Job No. 186-63.
Petroleum Information® Corporation, 1988, Oil Well and Gas Well Data for Wells Drilled in the Seal Beach Oil Field, Division of Oil and Gas, Long Beach, California.
SCS Engineers, 1988, 11 Air-Quality Solid Waste Assessment Test Proposal: Bixby Ranch Properties (City Dump and Salvage Site Nos. 1 through 4) Long Beach, California, 11 File No. 0187099.32.
SIX:0827R3ref R-1
)
l )
REFERENCES (Con1 t)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), 1983, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Zielbauer, E. J., W. Burnham, and A. Keene, 1961,
11 Coastal Basins Barrier and
Replenishment Investigation; Alamitos Barrier Project Geologic Investigation, 11 Los Angeles County Flood Control District, 28 pp.
SIX:0827R3ref R-2
TABLES
Anions
(ppm)
HUll£ I
SUPIIARY Of VADOSE ZONE ANAlYSES
BIXBY RANCH- MARKET PlACE lANDFill
PROJECT NO. 240827
Netals
(p.-J
Organics
(ppb)
\
General
Che~istry
sa..,le
---~-----.--
-~:!~) ·;ell pn2 so Cl ' N Po. Al As I Ba I Ca I Cr I ~:-r;:-G;1 ~--r Mg r-;;. Hi Pb Ti v Zn OFII vc B £8 X r--;- Callfornla o"r---~----- 1 -~-f~-J.;;-[;1 } - ~~ Action levels: · STlC oog/1) NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 5 100 NA 560 80 25 NA 0.2 NA NA HA 20 5 NA 24 250 NA NA NA NA NA HA TTlC !.ag/lg) NA NA NA NA NA NA HA 500 10,000 NA 2,500 8,000 2,500 NA 20 NA NA HA 2,000 1,000 NA 2,400 5,000 NA HA HA NA NA HA LabOrili?l ___ r-1 I I I I I• r-r- l -----r . II r!!~~~on 1 ___ 1 NA NA NA NA Var. Var. HA I 0.01 I ·0.2 5 0.01 0.05 0.03 I 0.1 0.0002 5 HA 0.02 0.04 0.2 0.05 0.05 0.02 5 5 5 5 51 5 I HP-Ia-1~ 5.0 ~\,.6 I 180 I 770 I <1 I <2 I NT I 0.11 I NO I ND NO NO NO 178 ND ND NT 4.6 ND ND 0.~ NO 0.2 ND ND ND ND NO NO I HP-1a-2 I 9.5 I 3,910 I 8.3 I 150 I 770 I <I I <2 I NT I 0.11 I 3.0 I ND I NO I NO I NO I 23 I ND I 50 I NT I 0.3 I ND NO ~----;r ~NO I Nll_J ND liD ND ND I HP-2a:1 ~ ~- 8.6 3,100 3,300 <10 <20 I NT I 0.20 I ND 11,690 I 0.1 I NO I NO I 190 I ND I NO NT 13 NO ND 1.8 0.6 J 1.31 ND ~ ND ND ND ND \ HP-2a·2 8.5 25,900 8.0 1,200 8,400 <10 <20 NT 0.22 4.0 10 ND 0.1 0.5 170 o.oo3l 60 NT 60 ND ND NO I 0.9 I 0.1 I NO ND ND ND HD ND I -~--. t -r-1
HP-3a·1 \ 5.0 2,470 8.5 930 230 <0.5 <10- NT 0.14 4.1 570 ND ND ND 120 ND NO NT 15 NO 5 3.3 0.8 I 2.1 I NO NO ND NO NO I NO HP-3a·2 I 10.0 18,100 8./ 520 6,200 <10 <20 NT 0.20 3.0 NO ND NO NO 120 0.002 NO NT 2.4 NO NO 0.9 0.5 I 0.31 NO NO NO NO 7.2 NO I ~;~4a-1 ~-~-~-~-T24,;;,;;-r-;:~- 2,900 8,500 18 <20 NT 0.14 NO 280 0.1 NO 0.4 85 NO I NO NT 4.4 NO NO 1.9 NO I 0.8 I NO I NO I NO NO ND NO I HP-4a-2 ~ 20,60~----;.9 1,600 8,600 <10 <20 NT NO ND 400 NO NO 0.4 100 NO I 10 NT 5.4 NO NO NO o.sj 0.2 I NO NO NO I No I NO ·No I 3,190 I 9.2 I 5,ooo I 8,ooo I 261 <391 NT I <o.t\ <21t.28ol <D.1 I <o.51 No I 39lo.ooo1l <5o I NT I 11l No I <2 --·,5 I NO I o.41 No I No I ND I No I 110 \ NO' HP-5-1 5.0 HP-5-2 I ID.D_I 2,070 I 10.1 I 1,300 I 5,300 I 9.2 I <9.9 I NT I <O.ll <2 I 300 I <0.1 I <0.5 I 0.3 I 40 jD.OOD/1 <50 I NT I 5.91 NO I <2 I <5 I NO I 0.4 I NO I NO I NO I NO I NO I N~l - Hi cromhos per centimeter (umho/cm)
- Units
- laboratory detection limits 1 is ted are method detection 1 imits.
Specific sample detection limits for metals are 10 times method detection limits.
EC -Electrical Conductivity
OFH - Dichlorodi fluoromethane
VC - Vinyl chloride
8 - Benzene
EB • Ethylbenzene
X - Xylcnes
T - To 1uene
OilS • Department of llealth Services
STLC • Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration
TTlC - Total Thr.eshold limit Concentration
NA - Not available or not applicable
ppm -Parts per million
ppb -Parts per billion
mg/l ·Milligrams per liter
mg/kg ·Milligrams per killo9ram
var. - Variable detection 1 imits
NT - Not tested
NO - The analyte was not detected at or above the laboratory dctrct ion 1 imit. (' ,.., .no?7 Tl
)
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANALYSES
FIRST QUARTER SAMPLING (10/19/88)
BIXBY RANCH - MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PROJECT NO. 240827
(Sheet 2 of 5)
ANIONS (mg/1)
TOTAL
OH co3 HC03 so4 Cl N03 PHOSPHORUS
California
DHS
Action Levels NA NA NA 250 250 45 NA
MP-1 none none 1,075 3,420 23,000 250 40
r~P-2 none none 1, 500 8,700 50,500 330 56
MP-3 none none 3,570 1,430 27,000 320 18
r~P-4 none none 1,740 1,870 6,800 230 32
MP-Blank none none 3 <1 <1 <1 0.01
OH - Hydroxide.
co3 - Carbonate.
HC03 - Bicarbonate.
so4 -.Sulfate.
Cl - Chloride.
N03 - Nitrate.
mg/1 -Milligrams per liter. Parts per million equivalent. me/1 - Milliequivalents per liter.
DHS - Department of Health Services.
NA - Not available.
SIX:0827-RllT2
NA
740
1,630
854
263
0.05 /~
~ . .
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF GROUND loiATER ANALYSES
FIRST QUARTER SAMPLING (10/19/88}
BIXBY RANCH - MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PROJECT NO. 240827
(Sheet 3 of 5}
METALS
(mg/1)
TOTAL TOTAL
Ag As Ba Be Ca Cd Co Cr Cu Fe K 11g Hn Mo Na Ni Pb Sb Se Tl v Zn
CATIONS
(me/1)
California
DIJS
Action Levels 0.05 0.03 1 NA 0.01 NA NA 0.05 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.03 NA NA NA NA NA NA
MP-1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.1 <0.05 425 <0.01 <0.05 <0.1 0.06 <0.05 575 1,500 1.8 <0.5 14,000 <0.05 <0.3 1 NT <0.06 <0.5 <0.05 710
MP-2 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.05 780 <0.03 <0.06 <0.1 0.01 0.05 275 3,200 2.8 <0.5 31,000 <0.05 <0.5 <1 NT 1.5 <0.5 <0.05 1,660
MP-3 <0.05 <0.05 2.8 <0.05 335 <0.01 <0.05 <0.1 0.08 0.2 515 1,750 3.0 <0.5 15,800 0.05 <0.3 <1 NT 0.8 <0.5 <0.05 864
MP-4 <0.05 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 850 <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 0.02 0.04 200 340 1.8 <0.1 4,600 <0.01 <0.1 <0.2 NT 0.2 <0.1 0.05 276
MP-Bl ank <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 <1 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02 <1 1 <0. 01 <0.1 <1 <0.01 <0.01 <0.2 NT <0.1 <0.1 <0.01
0.00 mg/1 -Milligrams per liter. Parts per million equivalent. me/1 - Milliequivalents per liter.
OilS - Department.of Health Services.
NA - Not avai.lable.
NT - Not tested.
SIX :0827 -R11T2
mg/1 -Milligrams per liter. Parts per million equivalent. ug/1 -Micrograms per liter. Parts per billion equivalent.
DHS - Department of Health Services.
NA - Not available.
NO - None detected above the laboratory detection limit. ,/"~~
/
)
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANALYSES
FIRST QUARTER SAMPLING (10/19/88)
BIXBY RANCH - MARKET PLACE lANDFill
PROJECT NO. 240827
(Sheet 5 of 5)
ORGANICS
(BASE/NEUTRALS AND ACIDS)
BIS DI-N-
OIL AND (2-ETHYLHEXYL) OCTYL-
GREASE PHTHALATE PHTHALATE
(mg/1) (ug/1)
California
DHS
Action Levels NA NA
Laboratory
Detection
Limit 1 10
MP-1 ND ND
t1P-2 NO ND
MP-3 ND 30
MP-4 ND ND
MP-BLANK ND ND
Test Method(EPA) 413.1 625
mg/1 -Milligrams per liter. Parts per million equivalent. ug/1 -Micrograms per liter. Parts per billion equivalent.
DHS - Department of Health Services~
NA - Not available.
NO -Non~ detected above the laboratory detection limits.
SIX :0827 -Rll T2
( u g/ 1 )
NA
10 NO
NO
66 NO
NO
•625
TOC TOX EC
(umho/cm)
California
DHS
Action
Levels NA NA 900
MP-1 24 0.57 27,300
MP-2 12 3.0 95,900
MP-3 46 2.7 65,400
MP-4 15 1.0 23,000
MP-5 8.6 0.65 23,000
MP-BLANK ND<l.O ND<0.010 3.1
TOC - Total organic carbon.
TOX - Total organic halogens.
EC - Electrical conductivity.
BOD - Biochemical oxygen demand.
COD - Chemical oxygen demand.
TFR ~ Total filterable residue.
TH - Total hardness as CaC03•
\BLE 3
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANALYSES
SECOND QUARTER SAMPLING {01/31/89)
BIXBY RANCH - MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PROJECT NO. 240827
{Sheet 1 of 5)
GENERAL CHEMISTRY {mg/1)
pH BOD COD TFR TA TH
(units)
NA NA NA 500 NA
7.4 4 100 19,300 .715
7.4 4 <50 73,500 632
7.4 7 <50 43,000 2,788
7.4 5 100 14,150 1,160
7.7 9 50 12,800 705
6.4 <2 5 5 2.5
TA -Total alkalinity as Caco3• ·
mg/1 -Milligrams per liter. Parts per million equivalent. umhos/cm - Micromhos per centimeter.
DHS - Department of Health Services.
NA - Not available.
NT - Not tested.
SIX: 0827 -Rll T3
SILICA FLUORI-DE
NA NA NA
NT NT 2.0
NT NT 1.0
NT NT 2.3
NT NT 2.2
NT NT 1.8
NT NT 0.1
/ -~...,
TABLE
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANALYSES
SECOND QUARTER SAMPLING (01/31/89)
BIXBY RANCH - MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PROJECT NO. 240827
(Sheet 2 of 5)
ANIONS (mg/1)
TOTAL
OH co3 HC03 so4 Cl N03 PHOSPHORUS
California
DHS
Action Levels NA NA NA 250 250 45 NA
MP-1 none none 872 2,200 9,000 53 2.8
MP-2 none none 772 10,500 41,000 132 1.4
MP-3 none none 3,401 2,400 36,000 27 0.7
MP-4 none none 1,415 1,815 6,900 41 1.4
MP-5 none none 860 1,240 7,000 41 5.6
MP-Blank none none 3 <1 <1 <1 <0.02
OH - Hydroxide.
~co 3 -Carbonate.
HC03 - Bicarbonate.
so4 - Sulfate.
Cl - Chloride.
N03 - Nitrate.
mg/1 - Milligrams per liter. Parts per million equivalent. me/1 - Milliequivalents per liter.
DHS - Department of Health Services~
NA - Not available.
SIX: 0827 -Rll T3
---~ -
,' -,
NA
323
1,432
1,131
263
243
<1
..
TOTAL
Ag As Ba Be Ca Cd Co Cr Cu
California
DfiS
Action levels 0.05 0.03 1 NA 0.01 NA NA 0.05 NA
MP-1 <0.01 0.01 <0.1 <0.01 230 <0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.03
HP-2 <0.05 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 760 <0.01 0.1 <0.01 0.15
MP-3 <0.01 0.04 <2 0.01 410 <0.01 0.02 <0.01 0.06
MP-4 <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 290 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.03
MP-5 <0.01 <0.05 <0.1 <0.01 140 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 0.02
MP-Bl ank <0.01 <0.01 <0.1 <0.01 1 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 mg/1 -Milligrams per liter. Parts per million equivalent '"----'
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANALYSES
SECOND QUARTER SAMPLING (01/31/89)
BIXBY RANCH - MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PROJECT NO. 240827
(Sheet 3 of 5)
METALS
(mg/1)
Fe K Mg Hn f1o Na
NA NA NA NA NA NA
0.04 214 NT 0.66 <0.1 5,800
0.10 860 NT 2.0 <1 30,500
0.18 450 NT 0.95 0.4 18,000
0.04 190 NT 2.0 0.1 4,600
0.03 210 NT 0.4 0.1 4,900
0.03 <1 NT <0.01 <0.1 <1
Ni Pb
NA 0.03
0.01 <0.03
0.2 0.2
0.02 <0.05
0.02 <0.05
<0.01 <0.05
<0.01 <0.005
1 The value for Total Cations is
- Milliequivalents per liter.
less than the amount for Total Anions, since ~1agnesium was not included in the sample analyses. me/1
DliS
NA
NT
- Department of Health Services.
- Not available.
- Not tested.
SIX:0827-R11T3
Sb Se Tl
NA NA NA
<0.05 <0.05 0.2
<0.05 <0.1 2.0
<0.05 <0.1 0.3
<0.1 <0.05 0.1
<0.05 <0.05 0.1
<1 <0.005 <0.1
v Zn
NA NA
NT 0.02
NT 0.05
NT 0.01
NT 0.01
NT 0.02
NT 0.02
\
)
TOTAL
CATIONS
(me/1)
NA
269
1,386
814
219
225
<1
-ABLE ·3
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANALYSES
SECOND QUARTER SAMPLING (01/31/89)
BIXBY RANCH - MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PROJECT NO. 240827
(Sheet 4 of 5)
ORGANICS
(PURGEABLE HALOCARBON$ AND AROMATICS) ·
METHYL METHYL
ISOBUTYL ETHYL ETHYL-
KETONE ACETONE KETONE BENZENE BENZENE TOLUENE XYLENE
(ug/1) (ug/l) fyg/l) · (LJgflJ ____ jug/1) 1l.Jg/l) (ygjl) California
OHS
Action
Levels NA NA 1, 770 0.70
Laboratory
Detection
Limits 5.0 1.0 5.0 0.5
MP-1 NO 98 42 NO
MP-2 NO NO NO NO
MP-3 NO NO 8.4 220
MP-4 ND ND. ND ND
MP-5 ND ND ND ND
MP-Blank ND ND ND ND
Test Method 502.2 502.2 502.2 .502.2
mg/1 -Milligrams per liter. Parts per million equivalent. ug/1 - Micrograms per liter. Parts per billion equivalent.
DHS - Department of Health Services.
NA - Not available.
ND - None detected above the laboratory detection limits.
SIX: 0827 -Rll T3
680.00 100.00 620.00
0.5 0.5 0.5
NO NO NO
NO NO NO
20 10 3.8
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
ND ND ND
502.2 502.2 502.2
.'I
~------
'-- --"
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF GROUND WATER ANALYSES
SECOND QUARTER SAMPLING (01/19/89)
BIXBY RANCH - MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PROJECT NO. 240827
(Sheet 5 of 5)
ORGANICS
(BASE/NEUTRALS AND ACIDS)
OIL AND
o-BHC o<.-BHC '1-BHC 4,4
1 -DDE 4,4 1 -Dbf,_ GREASE
--
( ug/1) (ug/1) ( u g/1 ) (ug/1)
Ca 1 iforni a
DHS
Action Levels NA o. 70 4.0 NA
Laboratory
Detection
Limit 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.01
MP-1 ND ND 0.02 ND
MP-2 ND 0.03 ND 0.03
MP-3 0.33 0.04 0.04 ND
MP-4 ND ND ND ND
MP-5 0.06 0.02 ND ND
MP-BLANK ND ND ND ND
Test Method 625 625 625 625
mg/1 -Milligrams per liter. Parts per million equivalent. ug/1 - Micrograms per liter. Parts per billion equivalent; DHS - Department of Health Services.
NA - Not available.
ND -None detected above the laboratory detection limits.
SIX :0827 -R11T3
(ug/1) (fng/1)
NA NA
0.02 1.0
ND 8
ND 4
0.04 7
ND <1
ND 1
ND <1
625 413.1
\
BIS
(2-ETHYLHEXYL)
PHTHALATE
(ug/1)
NA
5.00 ND
8.5 21 1
ND
ND
ND
625
(
i
'
)
TABLE 4
SITE MONITORING WELL INFORMATION
FIRST QUARTER SAMPLING (10/19/88)
MARKET PLACE SANITARY LANDFILL
WELL NUMBER
MP-1 MP-2 MP-3 MP-4
Location of well(a):
· Northing 3,665.66 3,037.87 3,240.28 2,846.94
Easting 5,889.95 6,390.57 5,522.62 5,812.35
Total depth of well (ft): 22.5 2~.3 22.3 28.1
Elevation of well
(ft above msl):
Top of weil monument
Center of cover 6.70 7.74 10.80 17~55
Ground surface 4.61 5.76 11.00 16.57
Top of casing 6.51 7.52 10.64 17.35
Depth of screened interval
7. 5-'"22-. 5 (ft): 8.3-23.3 7.3-22.3 13.1-28.1
Depth to water from well
casing (ft): 7.71 8.77 8.44 15.27
Depth to water from ground
surface (ft): 5.81 7.01 8.80 14.49
Elevation of water (ft
above msl): -1.20 -1.27 2.20 2.08
Date of water-level
measurement: 10/19/88 10/19/88 10/19/88 10/19/88
(a) The horizontal locations (coordinates of the wells) were surveyed from known control points along the Pacific Coast Highway. A total of six control points served as the basis of bearings and coordinate datum from the San Gabriel River bridge north to Colorado Street (about 1.5 miles). (b) The vertical coordinates (elevations of the wells) are based on County of Los Angeles·survey Monument L.B. L-6 being assigned the elevation of
20.46 feet.
SIX:0827R3T4
---\
l
I
TABLE 5
SITE MONITORING WELL INFORMATION
SECOND QUARTER SAMPLING (01/31/89)
MARKET PLACE SANITARY LANDFILL
WELL NUMBER
MP-1 MP-2 MP-3 MP-4 MP-5
Location of well- (a):
Northing 3,665.66 3,037.87 3,240.28 2,846.94 2,607.94
Easting 5,889.95 6,390.57 5,522.62 5,812.35 5,996.05
Total depth of well (ft): 22.5 23.3 22.3 28.1 23.4
Elevation of well(b)
(ft above msl):
Top of well monument
Center of cover 6.70 7.74 10.80 16.24* 16.69
Ground surface 4.61 5.76 11.00 16.58* 14.89
Top of casing 6. 51 7.52 10.64 16.13* 16.59
Depth of screened interval
(ft): 7.5-22.5 8.3-23.3 7.3-22.3 13.1-28.1 8.4-23.4
Depth to water from well
casing (ft): 4.45 7.85 8.26 14.15. 15.66
Depth to water from ground
surface (ft): 2.55 6.09 8.62 14.60 13.96
Elevation of water (ft
above msl): 2.06 -0.33 2.38 1.98 o. 93
Date of water-level
measurement: 01/31/89 01/31/89 01/31/89 01/31/89 01/31/89 (a) The horizontal locations (coordinates of the wells) were surveyed from known control points along the Pacific Coast Highway. A total of six control points served as the basis of bearings and coordinate datum from the San Gabriel River bridge north to Colorado Street (about 1.5 miles).
(b) The vertical coordinates (elevation of the wells) are based on County of Los Angeles Survey Monument L.B. L-6 being assigned the elevation of 20.46 feet. * Prior to the second sampling of well MP-4, the above-ground casing was cut flush with the ground surface and the well completed with a flush-mount waterproof box. The well was resurveyed at the time well MP-5 was surveyed.
SIX:0827R3T5
FIGURES
<!
I
1'
C\J
co
0 <:j
C\J
~
SITE~
SCALE
0 2000 4000 FEET
REFERENCE:
USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF
LONG BEACH, LOS ALAMITOS AND SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA QUADRANGLE; DATE: 1964, 1964 AND
1965 RESPECTIVELY; PHOTOREVISED= 1981; SCALE 1=24000
FIGURE
TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
N!
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
l__[_J,-.-N-.,,-s~-,-a-IP~l~h-,,-[-,,-,,w--,,-q------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ ~ i:o~
I r-
N ro
0 '¢
N
>
~I"'
.~
.'"'10 ~8:
IIIL CJ<(
~
~~;:; .,_o
~>
~Ill
0 No +_K_
STIFf DIAGRAM
WELL NO. MP-1
~
1440 1280 1120 960 800 640 480 320 160
CATIONS. IN MILLIEQUIVALENTS PER LITER
160 320 480 640 BOO 960 1120 1280 1440
--- --
Mg -- --
-
-~--
STIFF DIAGRAM
WELL N 0. MP- 2
ANIONS. IN MILLIEQUIVALENTS PER LITER
1440 1280 1120 .960 BOO 640 480 320 160 160 320 480 640 BOO 960 1120 1280 1440 ANIONS, IN MILLIEQUIVALENTS PER LITER CATIONS. IN MILLIEQUIVALENTS PER LITER
STIFF DIAGRAM
WEU NO. MP-3
==sl[_~-___ ----
' ' 1440 1280 1120 960 800 640 480 320 160 160 320 480 640 800 960 1120 1280 1440 CATIONS, IN MILLIEQUIVALEIHS PER LITER ANIONS. IN MILLIEQUIVALENTS PER LITER "' '
STIFF DIAGRAM
WELL NO. MP-4
I
'I
1440 1280 1120 960 800 640 480 320 160 160 320 480 640 800 960 1120 1280 1440 CATIONS. IN MILLIEQUIVALENTS PER LITER
STIFF DIAGRAM
WEll NO. MP-5
ANIONS, !N MllliEQUIVALENTS PER LITER
' ' ' 1440 1280 1120 960 BOO 640 480 320 160 0. 160 320 480 640 800 960 1120 1280 1440 CATIONS, IN _MILLIEQUIVALENTS PER LITER
STIFF DIAGRAM
SEA WAlER
ANIONS. IN MllLIEQUIVALENTS PER LITER
Cl
I
1440 1280 1120 960 800 640 480 320 160 160 320 480 640 BOO 960 1120 1280 1440 CATIONS. IN MILUEQUIVALEIITS PER LITER
[i]
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANIONS, IN MllLIEQUIVALENTS PER LITER
FIGURE 13
STIFF DIAGRAMS
lviARI<ET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
l()
<(
I
1'-
(\J
co
0 <;!"
(\J
())
ro
>' UJ~
0:: '
· .. .-·
24, 26
LEGEND
-5-- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR
SWAT MONITORING WELL
SCALE
r-----,
0 600
REFERENCE:
1200 FEET
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
FOR TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE, SEE FIGURE I.
Do Not Scale Thrs Drawrng
FIGURE 2
DETAILED TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
+
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
\.0
<(
I
1'-
(\J
co
0 <;;t
(\J
LEGEND:
SURFACE-WATER
FLOW DIRECTION
/""5_...- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR
SCALE
r------,
0 600
REFERENCE:
1200 FEET
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
FOR TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE, SEE FIGURE I.
··oo Not Scale Th1s Draw1ng"
+
FIGURE 3
SURFACE -WATER FLOW DIRECTION
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
rn .- .. Creating a Safer Tomorrow
"'
('J .. ~
<l. ~~;,'
>
I
r-
(J
CD
0 <:!"
N
'·
r
PM
LEGEND=
MP-1@ SWAT MONITORING WELL
U 10 ../7 DEPTH CONTOUR OF REFUSE
~ DEPRESSION
0 IT rtiPr"t•f.lll."rffiN, 1\~';;f S<;.Mf Nl (ll TIH Hl XtH tlANt"lt t ll"'f'hiH !'AN!TII.RY LfltHl~ I!! Fll~ Till. I Iff :'-f Nt"l Pr H/1..'1\fiPllll~ Sl'B;.TI\~rf:•, .JIJI,Y I, I <181, :1G{.:RE ASf" :'ABER, -iEr:'':"~C!i.N1CA:. at:ESTrGA:': :·~. ?? . ;.• .Sf:~ :;;•.:::.E:BAY.E? ~·:AD ~X7'E~S:CN, :. .... NG BEACH, ,:;,:.~:;-RS:;., ."::..: . .., • • -18 ~.
'\C(·RE ;..sc :'ABER. :N7E?1M :.:r.;s~.:.7::N :s·:ES7!GA7i:,:>N ?EPOR:', ?PO?".:SE~ !'IAR!CET ?L.A~E !o!o...I;:E -:'HEATER, :..:NG 3EA.:H, .:;,:.;.F':RN:A • .;:.....:;:.:s: n . . 186.
'1C<..RE AN:: :'ABER, :STER:M ?r::;NCA7::s :S'./EST::iA7::tL ri~C?~SED ;FF'!<:E ANiJ ?ESTA:.:RANT a·.r:..:.:!-/G, MR!l'Ei' ?t.A..:E 'ffi::E ?ARI< ?HAS£ :1. A"..Gi.:ST ~5 •• 186.
ENG:SEER!SG SC:ESCE, :sc., :H:?CP:T :F :;;,s "':::;aA:-::ro :NV!.:S:-:::;;. :"!.S, :"1-!£ "L\RKET ?:.A(;E, APF!r:. .r5.
3A5E M? - FCR REfERENCE, ::iEE f!':;l:RE: l,
S C A L E
200
APPROXIMATE
LANDFILL
OUNDARY
/
400 FEET
FIGURE 4
'"o o.
APPROXIMATE DEPTHS OF REFUSE
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORN lA
rn
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
(\J
<(
I
t'
(\J
(l)
0 <;t
(\J
-O"l
ro
>d:, w
o:::...'..
j
.. · ,._
0 LEGEND:
Qal ALLUVIAL AND COASTAL
L_ __ ...J DEPOSITS
Qpu TERRACE COVER
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
THE SEAL BEACH FAULT
REFERENCE :
SCALE
2000 4000 FEET FIGURE 5
REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
USGS WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1109 PLATE 3. ~
Nt
FOR TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE SEE FIGURE I. l.!..J ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow L-------------------------------------------~--------~LG Do Not Scale Th1s Draw1ng f'-.. __ -!; 1 I I
VI C)S:~ - ~UA;UV\.; -A- A B- B e.- c..-
) I
LEGEND=
MP-1@ SWAT MONITORING WELL
2.20 GROUND-WATER ELEVATION
(8.80) DEPTH TO GROUND WATER FROM GROUND SURFACE
/'?GROUND- WATER ELEVATION
1.0-' / CONTOUR
~DIRECTION OF GROUND-WATER FLOW
S C A L E
0 REFERENCE:
zoo 400 FEET
B.!I.SE MAP-CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
J I
.-'~<--APPROXIMATE
/
LANDFILL,
BOUNDARY
FlGURE 8
GROUND WATER ELEVATION
CONTOUR MAP FOR
10/19/88
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
rn
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
LEGEND:
MP-1@ SWAT MONITORING WELL
2.20 GROUND-WATER ELEVATION
(8.80) DEPTH TO GROUND WATER FROM GROUND SURFACE
./'?GROUND-WATER ELEVATION
1.0-' ./ CONTOUR
c==::> DIRECTION OF GROUND-WATER FLOW
S C A L E
0 200 400 FEET
REFERENCE=
BASE MAP-CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
~...---APPROXIMATE
LANDFILL,
BOUNDARY
Fl GURE 9
GROUND WATER ELEVATION
CONTOUR MAP FOR
01/31/89
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
rn
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
O'l
<(
-en
(I)
>~ wa:..!.
15 C\
SITE~
SCALE
0 2000
LEGEND
0 6.
REFERENCE=
WATER WELL
INJECTION WELL
EXTRACTION WELL
WELL LOCATION-LOS ANGELES COUNTY
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS.
4000 FEET
FOR TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE SEE FIGURE I.
FIGURE 10
WATER WELLS WITHIN
ONE MILE OF THE
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
>->cnCXl
oo
U,JlJ.J
::.c::> (,)0
wee ICL uCL ..,;:
• u •
-~
• 4)
-..
~t
j
it-. .'tO McFarland Energy, Inc
.. l ..
\ Cu«•. /11~
•liM.T A • .
'\:•u
/
~~ .,
~·
. "<'~
~~
:APPROXIMATE
LANDFILL BOUNDARY
·~~··
//////////////////,////// / // ////
;,
EXPLANATION
e DRILLING
9 DRILLING- IDLE
~ ABANDONED- DRY HOLE
e PRODUCING- OIL
+ IDLE- OIL
+ ABANDONED -O:L
• PRODUCING -GAS
• IDLF.-GAS
0 ABANDONED-GAS
•• GAS -OPEN TO OIL ZONE
"f' WATER SOURCE
- WATER CISPOSAL
/ WATER FLOOD
li TIDELAND 'II'ELLS
~'''' Flf.LO IIOUNDARY
&r·u., 1+ ABANDONED· DRY HOLE (showmv y1or drilled·
orld rofal deplh}
f BU~I£D IDLE t BURIED OIL IDLE
REFERENCE:
~
~
0 S C A L E
500
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION,
. DIVISION OF OIL AND GAS; DATE: 8/1/87; SCALE: 1"=500' • ll
• 41
1000 FEET
/
/
/
FIGURE 11
/i'IO
/ . ,• •,3
0 IL ·AND GAS WELL LOCATION MAP
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
S.EAL BEACH, CALIFORNIA
rn
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
Sl
LEGEND:
- RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
INSTITUTIONAL
SCALE
0 2000
-
4000 FEET
MILITARY
GENERAL PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT
REFERENCE:
CITY OF LONG BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
CITY OF SEAL BEACH PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
FOR TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE, SEE FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 12
ZONING MAP
MARKET PLACE SITE
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
m
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
I
APPENDIX A
DRILLING, SAMPLE COLLECTION, AND
WELL INSTALLATION PROCEDURES
)
)
APPENDIX A
DRILLING, SAMPLE COLLECTION, AND
MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION PROCEDURES
This appendix describes the field procedures for the drilling! sampling! and installation of ground-water monitoring wells for the SWAT investigation. All of the monitoring wells were installed outside the area of waste disposal.
Procedures for the listed activities are discus?ed below:
• Dri 11 ing
• Logging of geologic materials
• Sampling of geologic materials
• Monitoring well construction
• Monitoring well development
• Monitoring well sampling
• Equipment decontamination.
A.l DRILLING AND LOGGING
Each of the monito~ing wells were drilled using a truck-mounted CME Model 75 drilling rig. Each well was drilled initially with 3.75-inch inside diameter (I.D.) by 7-inch outside diameter (O.D.) hollow-stem augers. Soil samples for logging purposes were collected from ground surface to the bottom of each boring with a 3-inc~ I.D. by 5-foot-long splitbarrel sampler. Soil samples for 1 aboratory testing were co 11 ected at 5-foot i nterva 1 s with a Modified · California splitbarrel sampler.
Soils were logged according to industry standards. Boring logs with the following information are presented in Appendix E of this report:
• Proje~t number
• Boring number
• Name of field geologist .
• Ground-surface elevation and coordinates
• Date started and completed
SIX:0827-RlapA A-1
/ )
.. j
• Major soil component
• Secondary components and estimated percentages
• Unified soil classification symbol
• Color (Munsell® Soil or Geological Society of America Rock Color classification
• Consistency or density
• Moisture content-listed as an adjective (e.g., dry, moist, wet) • Texture and/or bedding (if apparent)
• Lithologic contacts
• Sample.depth, drive, and recovery
• Monitoring well details
• Total depth of hole.
A.2 SOIL SAMPLES
Soil samples were collected at 5-foot intervals and submitted for laboratory testing. The samples were collected with a Modified California splitspoon sampler lined with three stainless steel rings. During collection, the samp 1 er . is 1 owere~ to the so i 1 contact and hammered into the soil with an automatic hammer. The hammer weight is 140 pounds and falls a distance of 30 inches.. The hammer b 1 ows are recorded and the number of b 1 ows needed to drive the sampler the final 12 inches is an indication of relative density of the soil.
Upon retrieval of the sampler, the lower-most sample ring was removed. The ends of the ring were covered with a 1 umi num foi 1, p 1 asti c end caps, taped, labeled, stored on ice, and transported to the laboratory under IT•s chain-of custody procedures.
SIX:0827-R1apA A-2
_)
)
A.3 MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION
Upon completion of drilling and soil sampling, the hollow-stem augers were removed. Each boring was then reamed with 6. 25-inch I. D. by 11-inch 0. D. hollow-stem augers. The lead auger was fitted with a hardwood plug to keep soil from entering the inside of the augers.
After th~ final depth of the boring was reached, the augers were fil1ed with potable water and the hardwood plug was knock~d out of the lead auger. The water inside the augers helps keep soil from entering the auger when the plug is knocked out.
Each well is constructed of flush-threaded 4-inch-diameter schedule 40 PVC casing. The screened section is 15 feet in length and has 0.010-inch cut slots. The screen and blank casing were threaded together and lowered to the bottom of each borehole, and Monterey #2/12 sand was emplaced as a sand pack. The top of the sand pack was brought up to approximately 3- to 5-feet above the top of the screened interval. A 2- to.3-foot-thick bentonite seal was placed above the sand pack using 3/8-inch diameter bentonite pellets.
Above the bentonite seal, the area between the blank casing and the bo~ehole wall was grouted to the surface using a Volclay® bentonite slurry. During this process, the augers were retracted slowly to prevent any in situ material from sloughing in the borehole. Downhole 11 soundings11 were made for accurate placement of the sandpack, bentonite, and grout.
Two types of surface completion methods were used. Wells MP-3 and MP-4 were each completed at the surface with a cemented in-place, flush-mounted, water proof traffic box with internal locking protective casing. Wells MP-1, MP-2, and MP-5 were each completed at the surface with a cemented in-place, above-, ground, locking steel casing. Where above-ground casing was used~ three steel traffic posts were installed. at each well.
SIX:0827-RlapA A-3
)
A.4 MONITORING WELL DEVELOPMENT AND SAMPLING
The monitoring wells were developed using a 3-inch O.D. stainless steel bailer, a 3.5-inch diameter surge block, and an electric submersible pump.
The wells were bailed and surged to remove any sand from within the wells and to clean and tighten the sandpack around the screen. The wells were developed until very low turbidity water was charging the well.
The water extracted during development was drummed and labeled on site. Each drum of ground water was transported to the Bixby Ranch Company Studebaker Loynes site. The drums were transported to this location because they would have caused disruption to residents in the immediate area.
Following development, the wells were purged, and at least three water-column volumes of water were removed from each well and drummed as described above.
A Teflon® bailer was lowered down the wells to collect water samples for SWAT chemical analysis (Appendix B for details regarding the analytical program).
All of the containers were filled with ground water, and care was taken to protect the samples from cross-contamination and to protect the integrity of each sample. Forty-milliliter bottles (VOA bottles) were filled completely without air bubbles. Ground water for metals analysis was field-filtered using 0.45 micron filter )Japer. Sampling personnel used inert plastic gloves, which were disposed of after each sample was collected.
A.5 EQUIPMENT DECONTAM-INATION
A.5.1 Drilling Rig and Hoilow-Stem Auger Decontamination Between boreholes, excess soil on the drill rig was removed, and the hollow stem augers and associated tools were steam-cleaned. All water from steam cleaning was contained and transferred into drums.
SIX:0827-RlapA A-4
)
)
A.5.2 Well Casing Decontamination
Before lowering the well casings down each borehole, the well screen and blank sections were scrubbed with solution of Alconox® detergent, steam cleaned with potable water and rinsed with deionized water.
A.5.3 Soil Sampling Equipment Decontamination
Before collecting each Modified California splitspoon sample, the sampler, rings, and tools were disassembled, cleaned with a solution of Alconox®, detergent rinsed. in tap water, and rinsed with deionized water and reassem bled.
A.5.4 Ground-Water Development and Sampling Equipment Decontamination Between we 11 s, a 11 of the , ba i 1 i ng, deve 1 opment, and samp 1 i ng equipment was disassembled, steam-cleaned, cleaned with a solution of Alconox® detergent, rinsed with tap water, and then rinsed with deionized water.
SIX:0827-RlapA A-5
APPENDIX B
SAMPLE HANDLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
/
!
APPENDIX B
SAMPLE HANDLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
8.1 SAMPLE ANALYSES
Soil samples and water samples collected during the field investigation were analyzed for ana lytes outlined in the SWAT propos a 1. The collection pro cedures and analytical procedures for each sample type are discussed in the following sections.
8.2 SOIL SAMPLES
Soil samples were collected with a California Modified splitspoon sampler as described in Appendix A. Each sealed sample ring was placed inside a ziplock bag and stored on ice in a secure container.
The sofl samples were transported by IT personnel to IT Analytical Services (ITAS) in Cerritos, California following IT chain-of-custody procedures. The ( ) individual who collected the samples prepared them for shipment, described them on the chain-of-custody (C/C) form (Figure B-1) and signed the form when transferring the samples to another individual or to ITAS. The individual who accepted the samples also signed the form.
Two soil samples from each boring were submitted to the laboratory for analy sis. The ana lyses to be performed were written on the request-for-analysis (R/A) form (Figure B-2). The C/C form and the R/A form accompanied the samples during shipment to the laboratory. The analyses performed are listed below.
ANALYSES PERFORMED
ON SOIL SAMPLES
• EPA Method 8010 (halogenated volatile organics)
• EPA Method 8020 (aromatic volatile hydrocarbons)
SIX:0827-R1apB B-1
)
)
• SWAT Metals
• Anions (chloride, nitrate, phosphate, sulfate)
• Electrical conductivity, pH.
8.2.1 Volatile Organic Analysis
The soil samples were each analyzed for volatile organic compounds by U.S. EPA Methods 8010 and 8020. In the above methods, the compounds extracted from the sample are separated in a gas chromatograph and identified by a mass spectrophotometer.
8.2.2 SWAT Metals
Each soil sample was extracted by the California WET Test Extraction Procedure (48 hours of shaking 50 grams of soil in 500 milliliters of 0.2 molar sodium citrate solution). This procedure was chosen because it is intermediate in its ability to extract constituents; i.e., it is more powerful than a water extract, but less strong than acid dissolution of the soil. It was believed that some of the compounds formed by leachate percolating through the soil, especially phosphates, might resist a mild extraction procedure. However, ' acid dissolution· might dissolve so much of the mineral fraction that any metals or anions in surface coatings left by leachate, or present in the soil solution, would be masked. The WET extraction was chosen as the procedure most likely to dissolve the surface coatings on the soil particles without attacking the bulk of the mineral fraction. The sample extract was analyzed by Atomic Absorbance Spectrophotometry (AA) or Atomic Absorbance Spectrophoto metry/Graphite Furnace.
8.2.3 Anions·
Soi 1 samples were extracted by the California WET test extraction procedure (Section 8.2.2) and analyzed for anions by Ion Chromatography, an application of high pressure liquid chromatography.
SIX:0827-R1apB B-2
(""\ . I \ !
)
B.2.4 Electrical Conductivity and pH
Determination of electrical conductivity (EC) and pH of soil was determined on an aqueous solution of soil and water. The aqueous solution was made by com bining 20 grams of the soil sample, and 20 milliliters of distilled water in a glass beaker, mixing for 30 minutes and letting stand for 1 hour. The result ing solution was measured with standard laboratory equipment. Electrical conductivity was measured with a Wheatstone bridge-type conductivity cir cuit. Measurement of pH was with a pH meter, using a combination silver/ silver chloride electrode.
B.3 WATER SAMPLES
Water samples were collected from the wells with a stainless-steel bailer equipped with a Teflon® ball-type valve. Water samples were bottled and analyzed for the constituents below:
ANALYSIS
EPA Method 502.2 (Purgeables),
Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK), Acetone
EPA Method 625 (Base/neutral, acid
extractables)
SWAT Metals
General Chemistry, Anions, BOD
COO, TOC
.TOX
EPA Method 413.1 (oil and grease)
CONTAINER
Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA)
bottle, 40 milliliter, d~plicate
Amber glass bottle, 4 liter
Plastic bottle, 1 liter, HN03 preservative
Plastic bottle, 1 liter
Plastic bottle, 1 liter, H2so4 preservative
Amber glass bottle with VOA cap,
0.25 liter
Glass bottle, 0.5 liter, H2so4 preservative
Following the filling of a prelabeled bottle, it was stored on ice in a secure container. The water samples were transported by IT personnel to Edward S.
SIX:0827-RlapB B-3
Babcock & Sons, Inc. laboratory in Riverside, California, following IT chain of-custody procedures. The individual who collected the samples prepared them for shipment, described them on the laboratory chain-of-custody form (Figure B-3) and signed the form when transferring the samples to another individual or to Edward S. Babcock & Sons, Inc. The individual who accepted the samples also signed the form. The particular analyses to be performed on each sample were indicated on the chain-of-custody form.
The analytical procedures for each test are discussed in the following sections.
B.3.1 Organic Compounds
Water samples from the wells were analyzed for organic compounds by EPA Methods 502.2 (Purgeables), and 624 (Base/Neutrals and Acids).
EPA Method 502.2 employs a purge and trap sample extraction, followed by quantification of the organic compound using gas chromatography coupled to a photoionization detector (GC-PID). MEK and acetone were also determined by this method.
EPA Method 624 involves extracting a measured volume of sample with methylene chloride at a pH greater than 11 and again at pH less than 2. The methylene chloride extract was dried and concentrated to a volume of 1 milliliter. The extract was then analyzed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GS/MS) methods.
8.3.2 SWAT Metals
Water samples were analyzed for metals by two methods. The samples were analyzed by Atomic Absorbance Spectrophotometry (AA) or Atomic Absorbance Spectrophotometry/Graphite Furnace.
SIX:0827-R1apB B-4
I(~
\ .
)
8.3-.3 Anions
Water samples were analyzed directly for anions by Ion Chromatography, an application of high-pressure liquid chromatography.
8.3.4 General Chemical Parameters
Electrical conductivity (EC), pH, total filterable resi~ue {TFR), total hardness, chemical oxygen demand (COO), Biochemical oxygen demand (BOO), and silica were determined by standard laboratory methods.
Electrical conductivity was measured with a Wheatstone bridge-type conductivity circuit. Measurement of pH was with a pH meter, using a combination silver/silver chloride electrode. Total filterable residue was measured as residue after drying. Total hardness was calculated from the results of the calcium and magnesium determinations. Chemical oxygen demand was measured by addition of an excess of a powerful oxidizing agent (potassium dichloromate), digestion, then titrimetric determination of the unreacted oxidizing agent. Biochemical oxygen demand was determined by taking a sample of waste, or diluted portion, and incubating it for five days at 20°C in the dark. The reduction in dissolved oxygen concentration 'during the incubation period yields a measure of the biochemical oxygen demand. The concentration of silica was determined by filtering the sample through a 0.45-t filter.
Molybdate ion in acidic solution was added to the filtrate and the resulting color complex· is proportional to the dissolved silica in the sample. The color complex was measured spectrophotometrically.
8.3.5 Total Organic Halides and Total Organic Carbon
Water samples were analyzed for total organic halides (TOX) following EPA Method 9020, and for total organic carbon (TOC) by EPA Method 9060.
EPA Method 9020 detects all organic halides containing chlorine, bromine, and iodine. The analytical procedure involves passing a water sample through a column.containing 40 milligrams (mg) of activated carbon. The column is then SIX:0827-RlapB B-5
n ' /
washed to remove any trapped inorganic halides and is then combusted to convert the adsorbed organic halides to HX. The HX is contained and titrated electrolytically using a microcoulometric detector.
EPA Method 9060 was used to determine the concentration of organic carbon in water. The organic carbon in a water sample was measured using a carbonaceous analyzer. The analyzer converts the organic carbon Jn a sample to carbon dioxide (C02) by either catalytic combustion or wet chemical oxidation. The co2 is measured by an infrared detector or is converted to methane (CH4) and measured with a flame ionization detector (FID). The amount of co2 produced is directly proportional to the concentration of carbonaceous material in the sample.
B.3.6 Oil and Grease
Water samp 1 es were analyzed for oi 1 and grease fa 11 owing EPA Method 413 .1.
This method is used for the determination of hydrocarbons, vegetable oils, animal fats, waxes, soaps, greases, and related matter.
The analytical method is summarized by taking a sample and acidify to a pH less than 2, then extract the sample with fluorocarbon-113. The oil and grease is determined by comparing the infrared absorbance of the sample extract with standards.
SIX:0827-RlapB B-6
~
/=)
R/A Control No. ______ _
[i]
Il<.rfERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD.
C/C Control No. A 9 7 9 7 8
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER LAB DESTINATION
SAMPLE TEAM MEMBERS ---------------- CARRIER/WAYBILL NO. ---------------- Sample Sample Date and Time Sample Container Condition on Receipt Disposal Number Location and Descriptio~ Collected Type Type (Name and Date) Record No.
Special Instructions: ---------------------------------------------------- Possible Sample Hazards:-------------------------------------------------- SIGNATURES: (Name, Company, Date and Time)
1. Relinquished By:--------------------
Received By: _____________________ _
2. Relinquished By:--------------------
Received By:
WHITE- To accompany samples
YELLOW - Field copy
FIGURE B-1
3. Relinquished By:-~------------------
Received by:-----------------------
4. Relinquished By:--------------------
Received By: ____________________ ;__ __
[i]
h_. _e£.RNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT MANAGER
BILL TO
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
·'.____./
REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS
DATE SAMPLES SHIPPED
LAB DESTINATION
LABORATORY CONTACT
SEND LAB REPORT TO
DATE REPORT REQUIRED
PROJECT CONTACT
PROJECT CONTACT PHONE NO.
Sample No. Sample Type Sample Volume Preservative Requested Testing Program -
l
TURNAROUND TIME REQUIRED: (Rush must be approved by the Project Manager.) Normal ___ _ Rush ___ _ (Subject to rush surcharge)
~
R/ A Control No.8 9 j-d 3 3
C/C Control No. _____ _
Special Instructions
POSSIBLE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION: (Please indicate if sample(s) are hazardous materials and/or suspected to contain high levels of hazardous substances) · Nonhazard ___ _ Flammable __ _ Skin Irritant __ _ Highly Toxic __ _ SAMPLE DISPOSAL: (Please indicate disposition of sample following analysis. Lab will charge for packing, shipping, and disposaL) Return to Client __ _ Disposal by lab __ _
FOR LAB USE ONLY
Received By -;--:---------------,---
WHITE- Original, to accompany samples
YELLOW- Field copy FIGURE B-2
Date/Time----------
Other ________ __
(Please Specify)
')
/ =--"'"·
~
Edward S. Babcock & Sons, Inc CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
3215 Chicago Avenue
Riverside, CA 92507
(714) 684-1881
Lab #s: Invoice No.
Project No. Project Name I Location Determination Requested Condition of Sample
c '
N o p
Samplers: u n r
m t c e (signature) b a s h s e i e i e
r n a I r
Sampled e I I v
Description
0 r e e e
Date Time f s d d d Remarks
)
Relinquished By: Date/Time Received By: Relinquished By: Date/Time Received By: .
I I
Relinquished By: Date/Time Received By: Received For Lab By: Date I Time I I
FIGURE B-3
' (
\
APPENDIX C
CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS AND
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
rn
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
(~~ CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
17605 Fabrica Way • Cerritos, Cal1fornia 90701 • 213·921·9831 I 714·523·9200
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Prepared for:
IT Corporation
Date:
October 26, 1988
17461 Derian Ave., Ste. 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: John Audinis
Date Received: September 26' 1988 P.O. Number B4640R-15 Market Place SWAT
Eight (8) bulk samples
Job Number 48604/dan
The samples were extracted according to CAC Title 22 procedure and the resulting solutions were analyzed for the parameters as requested. The results are listed in Tables I and II.
The samples were also analyzed for halogenated volatile organics according to a modified EPA Method 8010 using a Tekmar liquid sample concentrator and a Varian 6500 gas chromatograph equipped with a Hall electrolytic conductivity detector. The results are listed on the following summary sheets.
The samples were analyzed for aromatic volatile hydrocarbons according to a modified EPA Method 8020 using a Tekmar liquid sample concentrator and a Varian 6000 gas chromatograph equipped with a photoionization detector. The results are listed on the following summary sheets.
The original request for analysis included sodium, however subsequent conversation caused sodium to be removed from the analytical suite.
Reviewed and Approved
Technical Director
Accred1ted by the Amencan lndustnal Hygiene Association IT-Irvine
John A1 ~li~s~--------------------------~-------------- ~·
Table I
Metals Analysis Summary
Milligrams Per Liter
Parameter
Detecti~n
Method*· Limits MP-1A-1 MP-1A-2 MP-2A-1 MP-2A-2
· Antimony 6010 0.06 ND<0.6 ND<0.6 ND<0.6 ND<0.6
Arsenic 7060 0.01 0. 11 0. 11 0.20 0.22
Barium 6010 0.2 ND<2 3 ND<2 4
Beryllium 6010 0.005 ND<0.05 ND<0.05 ND<0.05 ND<0.05
Cadmium 6010 0.005 ND<0.05 ND<0.05 ND<0.05 ND<0.05
Calcium 6010 5 ND<50 ND<50 1690 70
Chromium 6010 0.01 ND<O. 1 ND<O. 1 0. 1 ND<O. 1
Cobalt 6010 0.05 ND<0.5 ND<0.5 ND<0.5 0.7
Copper 6010 0.03 ND<0.3 ND<0.3 ND<0.3 0.5
Ir·on 6010 0. 1 78 23 190 . 170
Lead 6010 0.2 ND<2 ND<2 ND<2 ND<2
Manganese 6010 0.02 4.6 0.3 13 60
Mercury 7470 0.0002 ND<0.002 ND<0.002 ND<0.002 0.003
Molybdenum 6010 0.05 ND<0.5 ND<0.5 ND<0.5 ND<0.5
Nickel 6010 0.04 ND<0.4 ND<0.4 ND<0.4 ND<0.4
Potassium 6010 5 ND<50 50 ND<50 60
Selenium 7740 0.005 ND<0.05 ND<0.05 ND<0.05 ND<0.05
Silver 6010 ~;01 NP<O. 1 ND<O. 1 ND<O. 1 ND<O. 1
Titanium 6010 0.05 0.6 ND<0.5 1.8 ND<0.5
Vanadium 6010 0.05 ND<0.5 ND<0.5 0.6 0.9
· Zinc 6010 0.02 0.2 ND<0.2 1.3 0.7
* - SW846, 3rd Edition.
MP-3A-1 MP-3A-2
ND<0.6 ND<0.6
0. 14 0.20
4. 1 3
ND<0.05 ND<0.05
ND<0.05 ND<0.05
570 ND<50
ND<O. 1 ND<O. 1
ND<0.5 ND<0.5
ND<0.3 ND<0.3
120 120
5 ND<2
15 2.4
ND<0.002 0.002
ND<0.5 ND<0.5
ND<0.4 ND<0.4
ND<50 ND<50
ND<0.05 ND<0.05
ND<O. 1 ND<O. 1
3.3 0.9
0.8 0.5
2. 1 0.3
MP-4A-1
ND<0.6
0. 14
ND<2
ND<0.05
ND<0.0.5
280
0. 1
ND<0.5
0.4 85
ND<2
4.4 /~ ,Job //48604
) Page 2
MP-4A-2 ·
ND<0.6
ND<O. 1
ND<2
ND<0.05
ND<0.05
400
ND< 0. 1
ND<0.5
0.4 100
ND<2
5.4 ND<0.002 ND<0.002
ND<0.5 ND<0.5
ND<0.4 ND<0.4
ND<50 70
ND<0.05 ND<0.05
ND<O. 1 ND<O. 1
1.9 ND<0.5
ND<0.5 0.5
0.8 0.2
....
o-i
A - Detection limits are based upon concentration in the aqueous extract and are expressed in milligrams per lite~ Detection limits may vary due to sample matrix. XI
"CC
0 XI
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. > o-i ..... 0 :z:
JT-lrv1ne
John A· ---;···.::n:..:::ic:::s~--------------------
·~I
Table II
Parameter Method Units MP-1A-1 MP-1A-2 MP-2A-1 MP-2A-2
pH 9045A pH 7.6 8.3 8.6 8.0
Conductivity 120. 1 B umhos/cm 3190 3910 16000 25900
Chloride 300.0B mg/kg 710 770 . 3300 8400
Nitrate (as N) 300.0B mg/kg ND<1 ND<1 ND<10 ND<10
Phosphate (as P) 30o.oB mg/kg ND<2 ND<2 ND<20 ND<20
Sulfate 300.0B mg/kg 180 150 3100 1200
A - SW846, 3rd Edition.
B - 600/4-79-082.
ND -The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit.
MP-3A-1 MP-3A-2
8.5 8.7
2470 18100
230 6200
ND<0.5 ND<10
ND<10 ND<20
930 520
MP-4A-1
7.5 24200
8500
18 ND<20
2900
·.Job /148604
) ' Page 3
._ _ ___,_/
MP-4A-2
7.9 20600
8600
ND<10
ND<20
1600
--i
0 0
"' .,
0 "' > -i
-0
z
)
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Job No . ______ 4_8...;_6_04---.,... ____ _
Client ______ ~M~a~r~k~e~t~P~l~a~c~e~·s~W~A~T~-----
Project __________________________ _
Client No.~----~--~------~-----
Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
£-f~M}
Field Sample No. __ -~M~P~-~1~A~-~1 _______ _
Analysis No. --:--------:7....:4..:::2+7--;:;-;::;-----------Date Collected 9-26-88 Date Received -------9~-~2~6~-~8~8~--------- Date Analyzed ____ ~9_-~28~-~8~8~~----
QC Report No . ___ ___:;_80.;;..1~0;_-....:.8....:.8_-0-'-'9::;...__ __ _ Dilution Factor NA
----~~---------------
Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzyl chloride ---- ----
Bis(2-Chloroethoxv)methane ---- ----
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ---- ----
Bromo benzene ---- ----
Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5
Bromoform 5 ND<5
Bromomethane 5. ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chloroacetaldehyde ---- ----
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform 5 ND<5
1-Chlorohexane ---- ----
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 5 ND<5
(
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
Chloromethyl methyl ether ---- ----
Chlorotoluene ---- ----
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
Compound
Dibromomethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1 1-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 1-Dichloroethylene
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropro~ane
Trans-1 3-Dichloropropylene
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1.1 1 2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1 • 1 1-Trichloroethane
1 • 1 2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichloropro~ane
Vinyl chloride
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Field Sample Number: MP-1A-1
Concentration Retention Time
Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes
---- ----
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
---- ----
5 ND<5
'
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
---- ----
5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. -------'
! 1-
)
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Job No . -----,-,.-----::'-48::....;6::...:0:....;4~,..,..-------- Client Market Place SWAT
~----~~~---=~~~~-----Project __________________________ __ Client No.~--------~--------------
LaG3:~7~J" Approval:
Sample Ma ix:
I I Water (ugll)
I X I Soil (ug/kg)
I I Other
Field Sample No. MP-1A-2
-----=~~----------~
Analysis No. 7428 Date Collect-ed~----~9--~276--8~8~---------- Date Received 9-26-88
------~~~~------------
Date Analyzed ___ -~9~-~28~-~8~8~------
QC Report No. _____ 8..;;....0.:....1,;_:0;_-...::.8...::.8_-0"""'9~--- Dilution Factor NA
----~~---------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------Spike Source __________________________________________________________________ _ Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzyl chloride ---- ----
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ---- ----
Bis(2-chloroisopro~))ether ---- ----
Bromobenzene ---- ----
Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5
Bromoform 5 ND<5
Bromomethane 5 ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chloroacetaldehyde ---- ----
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform 5 ND<5
I
1-Chlorohexane ---- ----
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 5 ND<5
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
Chloromethyl methyl ether ---- ----
Chlorotoluene ---- ----
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
(~\
' I
' /
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile O~ganics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Field Sample Numbe~: MP-1A-2
Concent~ation Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Dib~omomethane ---- ----
1 2-Dichlo~obenzene 5 ND<5
1 3-Dichlo~obenzene 5 ND<5
1 4-Dichlo~obenzene 5 ND<5
Dichlo~odifluo~omethane 5 ND<5
1,1-Dichlo~oethane 5 ND<5
1 2-Dichlo~oethane 5 ND<5
1 1-Dichlo~oethylene 5 ND<5
T~ans-1 2-Dichlo~oethvlene 5 ND<5
Dichlo~omethane 5 ND<5
1 2-Dichlo~op~opane 5 ND<5
T~ans-1 3-Dichlo~op~opylene 5 ND<5
1 ' 1 '2 2-Tet~achlo~oethane 5 ND<5
1~ 1 1 2-Tet~achlo~oethane ---- ----
Tetrachloroethylene 5 ND<5
1 ' 1 1-Trichlo~oethane 5 ND<5
1~ 1 2-T~ichlo~oethane 5 ND<5
T~ichloroethylene 5 ND<5
T~ichlorofluoromethane 5 ND<5
Trichloropropane ---- ----
Vinyl chloride 5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. r\
\ I
)
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Job No . -----____:_48::;.;6;:;..;0:...:4:_,..,...,.--,,.---- Client Market Place SWAT Project __________________________ _ Client No.~----~--~------~------
La(fl:~J Approval:
Sample Ma ix:
I I Water (ug/1)
1-x-1 Soil (ug/kg)
Field Sample No. MP-2A-1
-----=~--------------Analysis No. 7429 Date Coll ec t-ed~---9=--.;...:2~6--""88:::------- Date Received 9-26-88
------~~~~~----------
Date Analyzed ______ ~9_-~28::;.;-~8~8~---------
QC Report No . ____ _.,;;_80;;...1.;..;;0'---....:;.8~8-_0;:;....:9'------- Dilution Factor NA
----~~---------------
I I Other ______________________________________________________________ __ _ Spike Source------------------------------------------------------~~--------- Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzyl chloride ---- ----
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ---- ----
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ---- ----
Bromo benzene ---- ----
Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5
Bromoform 5 ND<5
Bromomethane 5 ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chloroacetaldehyde ---- ----
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform 5 . ND<5
1-Chlorohexane ---- ----
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 5 ND<5
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
Chloromethyl methyl ether ---- ----
Chlorotoluene ---- ----
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
(",
'· /
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Field Sample Number: MP-2A-1
Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Dibromomethane ---- ----
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5 - ND<5
Dichlorodifluoromethane 5 ND<5
1 1-Dichloroethane 5 ND<5
1 2-Dichloroethane 5 ND<5
1, 1-Dichloroethylene 5 ND<5
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 5 ND<5
Dichloromethane 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichloropropane 5 ND<5
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 5 ND<5
1,1 2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5 ND<5
1,1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane ---- ----
Tetrachloroethylene 5 ND<5
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane 5 ND<5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 ND<5
Trichloroethylene 5 ND<5
Trichlorofluoromethane 5 ND<5
Trichloroprooane ---- ----
Vinyl chloride 5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. )
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Job No. ---,...--___;4~8~6..;;..04-'--:~~---
Client ______ ~M~a~r~k~e~t~P;l=a~c~e_S~W~A~T~-----
Project __________________________ ___
Client No. ________________________ __
La?~~ Approval:
Sample Ma ix:
I I Water (ug/1)
I X I Soil (uglkg)
Field Sample No. -----'M::-:;P~-::-:;2:..o.A:....-..:::2'------- Analysis No. 7430 Date Collec t-ed-,------9:.....-.:..::2:....;6--=88=------- Date Received 9-26-88
------~~~~~----------
Date Analyzed ___ ~9~-2~8~-~8~8~~----
QC Report No. ____ 8=-0=-1.:....:0:.....--=8..::.8_-0:::....,9~----- Dilution Factor NA -----------------------
I I Other _________________________________________________ '-------------- Spike Source __________________________________________________________________ _ Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1' Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzyl chloride ---- ----
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ---- ----
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ---- ----
Bromobenzene ---- ----
Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5
Bromoform 5 ND<5
Bromomethane 5 ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chloroacetaldehvde ---- ----
Chlorobemzene 5 ND<5
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform 5 ND<5
1-Chlorohexane ----
2-Chloroethvl vinyl ether 5 ND<5
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
· Chloromethyl methyl ether ---- ----
Chlorotoluene ---- ----
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
)
J
Compound
Dibromomechane
~
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1 1-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 1-Dichloroethylene
Trans-1,2-Dichloroeth~lene
Dichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 3-Dichloropropyle.ne
1 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 1,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1 1, 1-Trichloroethane
1 ' 1 2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichloropropane
Vinyl chloride
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Field Sample Number: MP-2A-2
Concentration Retention Time
Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes
---- ----
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
~
5 ND<5
---- ----
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
---- ----
5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit.
J
/
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Job No. _____ __:_48::...:6:....:0:.....:4 __________ _ Client ______ ~M~a~r~k~e~t~P~l~a~c~e_S~W~A~T~-----
Project~--------------------------
Client No.~----~--~------~------
LafJ:~~::.:~/pproval:
Sample Mat ix:
I I Water (ugll)
1_!_1 Soil (uglkg)
Field Samp 1 e No . ------'M::-;P;,.-:-,.=3:-::-A=--~1 __________ _ Analysis No. 7431 Date Co 11 ec t-ed-:----~9=--~2:-:;6---;:;-88;::;------- Date Received 9-26-88
------~-7~~----------
Date Analyzed ______ ~97-~28~-~8~8~~-------
QC Report No . _____ __;::_80=-1.:....:0:._-..:::8..:::.8_-0:...:9~--- Dilution Factor NA
------~----------------
I I Other ______________________________________________________________ __ Spike Source __________________________________________________________________ __ Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzyl chloride ---- ----
Bis(2-Chloroethoxv)methane ---- ----
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ---- ---- -
Bromo benzene ---- ----
Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5 -
Bromoform 5 ND<5
Bromomethane 5 ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chloroacetaldehyde ---- ----
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform 5 ND<5
1-Chlorohexane ---- ----
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 5 ND<5
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
Chloromethyl methyl ether ---- ----
Chlorotoluene ---- ----
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
Compound
Dibromomethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1 1-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 1-Dichloroethylene
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 3-Dichloropropylene
1 1 2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1 1, 1-Trichloroethane
1 1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichloropropane
Vinyl chloride
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
H~logenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Field Sample Number: MP-3A-1
Concentration Retention Time
Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes
---- ----
5 ND<5
..
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
---- ----
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
---- ----
5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Job No . ------::-48:::..;6:....:0:.....;4'--::-:-:-:-:::---- Client ____ ~~M~a~r~k~e~t~P~l=a~c~e~S~W~A~T~-----
Project ________________________ ___
Client No. ____________________ __
Lab~atoSY Supervisor Approval:
(Y·e£()L~
Sample Mathx:
I I Water (ugll)
I X I Soil (uglkg)
Field Sample No. ___ _:M::-;P~-:-':3~A.:....-...::2:..._ ______ _ Analysis No. 7432 Date Collec t-e·7i ----9::-_.:...:2:-:;;6:..._--;::;-8"'8 ----- Date Received 9-26-88 Date Analyzed-----~9--~28~-~8~8~--'------ QC Report No. -----=-80=-1.:...:0:..._--=8..::.8_-0=-9~---- Dilution Factor NA ____ _....:~-----------
I I Other ______________________________________ _
Spike Source _______________________________________________________________ ___ Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzyl chloride ---- ----
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ---- ----
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ---- ----
Bromo benzene ---- ----
Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5 .
Bromoform 5 ND<5 '
Bromomethane 5 ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chloroacetaldehvde ---- ----
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform 5 ND<5
1-Chlorohexane ---- ----
2-Chloroethvl vinyl ether 5 ND<5
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
Chloromethyl methyl ether ---- ----
Chlorotoluene ---- ----
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
)
Compound
Dibromorriethane
1 2-Dichlorobenzene
1l3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1 1-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 1-Dichloroethylene
Trans-1 2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 3-Dichloropropylene
1,1~2 2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1 1, 1-Trichloroethane
1· 1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trichloropropane
Vinyl chloride
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Field Sample Number: MP-3A-2
Concentration Retention Time
Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes
---- ----
5 ND<5
-
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
---- ----
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
---- ----
5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. \ )
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Job No. -------..:4-=8.::.6.::..04...:.._ ____ _
Client _______ M~a~r~k~e~t~P~l~a~c~e_S~W~A~T~-----
Project __________________________ _
Client No.~----~--~------~-----
pproval:
Sample Mat ix:
I I Water (ugll)
I X I Soil (uglkg)
Field Sample No. MP-4A-1 Analysis No. ----:7::..4-:-:3:-::3:--------- Date Collected 9-26-88 Date Received -----~9~-~2~6~-~8~8------- Date Analyzed 9-28-88 QC Report No.----~870 710~-~8~8~-~079 ______ __ Dilution Factor NA ------------------------
1 ___ 1 Other ____________________________________________________________ ~-- Spike Source -------------------------------------------------------------------- Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzyl chloride ---- ----
Bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane ---- ----
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ---- ----
Bromo benzene ---- ----
Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5
Bromoform 5 ND<5 ;
Bromomethane 5 ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chloroacetaldehyde ---- ----
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform 5 ND<5
1-Chlorohexane ---- ----
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 5 ND<5
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
Chloromethyl methyl ether ---- ----
Chlorotoluene ---- ----
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Field Sample Number: MP-4A-1
Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Dibromomethane ---- ----
1i2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1~3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Dichlorodifluoromethane 5 ND<5
1,1-Dichloroethane 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichloroethane 5 ND<5
1,1-Dichloroethylene 5 ND<5
Trans-1 2-Dichloroethylene 5 ND<5
Dichloromethane 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichloropropane 5 ND<5
Trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 5 ND<5
1~1i2 2-Tetrachloroethane 5 ND<5
1 ' 1 1,2-Tetrachloroethane ---- ----
Tetrachloroethylene 5 ~ID<5
1 ' 1 1-Trichloroethane 5 ND<5
1 ' 1 2-Trichloroethane 5 ND<5
Trichloroethylene 5 ND<5
Trichlorofluoromethane 5 ND<5
Trichloropropane ---- ----
Vinyl chloride 5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. ( ')
\
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Job No . -----:-:----:---:--::::-c48:'-'6:....:0~4--=:-:-:-::=---- Client ______ ~M~a~r~k~e~t~P~l~a~c~e~S~W~A~T~-----
Project ______________ ~-----------
Client No. ________________________ __
L~~or Approval:
Sample M trix:
I I Water (ugll)
I X I Soil (uglkg)
Field Sample No . ----:M=-;P~..:..:o4:-.:.A.:....-...:::2:..__ _____ _ Analysis No. 7434 Date Collect-ed-=--. ---9.!....-.!...::2:!..,;6;._,-"""'"8-=-8----- Date Received 9-26-88 Date Analyzed------~9--~2~8-~8~8~--------- QC Report No. ---~80~1 0:...--=8:..;::;8_-.=...09~---
Dilution Factor NA
--~~---------
I I Other ___________________________________ _
Spike Source __________________________________________________________________ _ Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzyl chloride ---- ----
Bis(2-Chloroethoxv)methane ---- ----
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ---- ----
Bromobenzene ---- ----
Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5
'
Bromoform 5 ND<5
Bromomethane 5 ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chloroacetaldehyde ---- ----
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5 .
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform 5 ND<5
1-Chlorohexane ---- ----
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 5 ND<5
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
Chloromethvl methyl ether ---- ----
Chlorotoluene ---- ----
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
r-. \
\
~N~LYTIC~L RESULTS SUMM~RY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EP~ Method 8010
IT CORPORATION
Field Sample Number: MP-4~-2
Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Dibromomethane ---- ----
1 2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Dichlorodifluoromethane 5 ND<5
1 1-Dichloroethane 5 ND<5
1 2-Dichloroethane 5 ND<5
1,1-Dichloroethylene 5 ND<5
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 5 ND<5
Dichloromethane 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichloropropane 5 ND<5
Trans-1,3-Dichloroproovlene 5 ND<5
1 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5 ND<5
1 1 ' 1 2-Tetrachloroethane ---- ----
Tetrachloroethylene 5 ND<5
1 1,1-Trichloroethane 5 ND<5
1 1 2-Trichloroethane 5 ND<5
Trichloroethylene 5 ND<5
Trichlorofluoromethane 5 ND<5
Trichloropropane ---- ----
Vinyl chloride 5 ND<5 .
-
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. r'j
\ '
( )
IT CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No. -------,-4~8:;...;6:...::0...:.4~---,----
Client ____ ~M~a~r~k~e~t~P~l~a~c~e~SW~A~T~-----
Project __________________________ _
Client No.~----~--~------~----
Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sample Matrix:
I I Water (ug/lt
I X I Soil (ug/kg)
I I Other
Spike Source
Compound
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1 3-Dichlorobenzene
1 4-Dichlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Toluene
Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes)
Det Lim
5 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
Field Sample No. MP-1A-1
----~~~~--------------Analysis No. 8157 Date Collect-ed~----~9~-~276--8=8~------------ Date Received 9-26-88
------~~~~~-------------
Date Analyzed ____ --~9~-~3~0_-~88~~-----------
QC Report No. ___ ~8~02~0~-~8~8~-...:.1~6 ____ ___
Dilution Factor NA
----~~-------------------
Concentration Retention Time
Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit.
IT CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No. ________ ....:.4.;::.8.::...60=-4.:...,...,.. ______ _ Client ____ ~M~a~r~k~e~t~P~l~a~c~e~SW~AT=-------
Project __________________________ _
Client No. __________ ~-------------
Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sampte Matrix:
1 1 Water (ugll)
Field Sample No. __ ,M~P~-~1~A....;.-2~-----
Analy sis No . --:-----::8:....:1-::5-71---;::;-;::;--------Date Collected 9-26-88 Date Received ------~9~-:....:2~6~-~8~8~----------- Date Analyzed ___ ~9~-~3.;:;.0_-8~8~~------
QC Report No . _____ 8_0.;;;.20..:....-_8:....:8:.....-_;1...;;.6 ____ _ 1 X 1 Soil (uglkg) Dilution Factor ____ _....;.N~A=--------------- 1 I Other --------------------------------Spike Source
Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzene 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Ethyl benzene 5 ND<5
Toluene 5 ND<5
Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes) 5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. )
IT CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No. 48604
Client Market Place SWAT Project __________________________ _ Client No.~----~--~------~----
Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sample Matrix:
I I Water (ugll)
1-x-1 Soil (uglkg)
1---1 Other
Spike Source
Compound
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Ethyl benzene
Toluene
Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes)
Det Lim
5 .5
5 5
5 5
5 5
Field Sample No. ____ ~M~P~-~2~A~--1~-------------
Analysis No. 8152 Date Collect-ed~-----79-~2~6~-~8~8~------------ Date Received 9-26-88
------~~~~~-------------
Date Analyzed ____ --~9~-~3_0_-~88~~-----------
QC Report No . -----=-80=...:2::...:0;_--=8..:::.8_-...:...16;:..._ ____ _ Dilution Factor NA
----~~-------------------
Concentration Retention Time
Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. (l
IT CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No. 48604
Client Market Place SWAT Project __________________________ _ Field Sample No. ____ ~M~P~-~2~A~-=2 ____________ __
Analysis No. 8153 Date Collect-ed~----~9~-~276~-8~8~------~----- Client No. ______________________ ___
Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Date Received 9-26-88
------~~~~~-------------
Date Analyzed ____ --~9~-~3~0--8~8~~-----------
QC Reporf No. ______ ~8~02~0~-~8~8~-~1~6 ________ ___
Sample Matrix:
I I Water (ugll)
I X i Soil ( uglkg) Dilution Factor NA
I I Other --------------------------------------~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-Spike Source Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzene 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Ethyl benzene 5 ND<5
Toluene 5 ND<5
Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes) 5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit.
IT CORPORATION
.. ~. Page 24
I
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No. 48604
Client Market Place SWAT Project __________________________ _ Client No.~----~--~------~----
Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sample Matrix:
I I Water (ugll)
Field Sample No. ____ ,M~P~-7.3~A_-~1 ____________ _
Analysis No. 8154 Date Collect-ed~----~9~-~2~6--8~8~------------ Date Received 9-26-88
------~~~~~------------
Date Analyzed ____ --~9~-~3~0_-~88~~-----------
QC Report No . _______ 8=...;0::..:2::..:0~-..::.8.:::.8-_1.:...:6:...._.. ______ _ I X I Soil (ug/kg) Dilution Factor ____ ~N~A~----------------- 1 I Other --------------------------------------------------------------Spike Source Concentration · Retention Time
Compound Det Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzene 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Ethyl benzene 5 ND<5
Toluene 5 ND<5
Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes) 5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit.
IT CORPORATION
,~ Page 25
\ j
( )
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No. 48604
Client Market Place SWAT Project __________________________ _ Client No.~----~--~------~----
Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sample Matrix:
I I Water (ugll)
I X I Soil (uglkg)
I I Other
Field Sample No. ____ ~M~P~-~3~A~-~2 ____________ __
Analysis No. 8155 Date Collect-ed~----~9~-~2~6--8=8~------------- Date Received 9-26-88
------~~~~~------------
Date Analyzed----~~9~-~3~0_-~88~~-----------
QC Report No . --------=-8-=-02=-0=---=8:...:8:....-~1...::.6 ________ _ Dilution Factor NA
----~~-------------------
Spike Source ------------------------------------------------------------------- Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzene 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Ethyl benzene 5 ND<5
Toluene 5 ND<5 I
Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes) 5 7.2 17.74
ND·- The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit.
IT CORPORATION
~, Page 26
I )
'\
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No . ---=--=---=--~:-:-4...:...8-'-60.:....4~:-:-=--- C lien t __ _;M:..::a::.:r:....:k:.:..:e:::..;t:.._:P-=1=-=a=-=c-=e---=-S.;.;.W.:..:.A T.::..._ __ _ Project _____________ _ Client No. --------------Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sample Matrix:
1 1 Water (ugll)
Field Sample No. __ ~M~P~-74.:..:.A-_1~-------
Analysis No. ________ -=8.;.;.1~5~6-=~-------------
Date Collected 9-26-88
----~~~~------------Date Received 9-26-88
-----~~~~~---------
Date Analyzed._ ------~9~-~3~0_-~88~~-----------
QC Report No. -----'-80.;:_;2~0'---...;:8""""8_-...:...1...:...6 ----~--- I X I Soil (ug/kg) Dilution Factor ____ ---..:.N.:..:.A~------------- 1 I Other ---------~---------------------------------------Spike Source Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzene 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Ethyl benzene 5 ND<5
Toluene 5 ND<5 -
Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes) 5 ·:D<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. /
IT CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No. _______ ....:..4..::.8.::....60.::....4,;___ ___ _ Client ____ ~M~a~r~k~e~t~P~l~a~c~e~S~W~AT~------
Project __________________________ _
Client No. ______________________ ___
Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sample Matrix:
I I Water (ugll)
1-x-1 Soil (uglkg)
1-1 Other
Field Sample No. ____ ~M~P~-~4~A_-~2 ________ _
Analysis No. 8158 Date Collect-e~d-----~9~-7267-~8~8.------------- Date .Received ______ ~9~-~2~6~-~8~8 ____________ __
Date Analyzed ____ ~9~-~370-~8~8~~-------
QC Report No . -------=8-=-0.::.2..::...0-__;8::;..;8::....-~1-=.6 ______ _ Dilution Factor ____ ~N~A~------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------Spike Source Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzene 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1~4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Ethyl benzene 5 ND<5
Toluene 5 ND<5
Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes) 5 ND<5
ND - The analyte ~as not detected at or above the stated detection limit. rn
IN..- 1NATIONAL
TE .. NOLOGY
CORPORATION
PROJECT NAME 0~ ft~tLZ..I' PL.-4c£. ;SuA r
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT MANAGER
BILL TO
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
B l.-/ft,l.fOR.-rs
TDI-l-~ A-u(}ri\Jl ~
l:T CEQJ21~
-~
REQUEST FOh-ANALYSIS 48604
DATE SAMPLES SHIPPED
LAB DESTINATION
LABOAA TORY CONTACT
SEND LAB REPORT TO
DATE REPORT REQUIRED
A/A Control No. 8 7 ~ ';o 6
C/C Control No. fl 1 q 6o j
Cf-2.0-~8
TIA:> CE~ITDS
Pttr c t-+A P fl1A;J
.II - Tf2vtJ..Jt_
f\1TI'/; TotfiV Avoi"--IJ
A~f\ (J
PROJECT CONTACT Joi/,J Auut~;J , K £<.>1:, Aa.,.Jlc.;J
PROJECT CONTACT PHONE NO. 71Lf- 2{:,1- 0 '('I (
---- ---- -- ---- -
Sample No. Sample Type Sample Volume Preservative Requested Testing Program Special Instructions rnf-lq~l ~'"-.- F'~LL ZY1..-Xb t){4..UJ_._ - ~C£ A:JAL'(Z~ £. Ac-~ <; jl rn fl t. Fo /!. 3+u 5 DAY 111P·-Ia-J 'S.ciL- II II I !.IE ro L-LD ·-,~6: Tuf!.tJ At2.ov~O mP-;)a.-1 So.tL II It lr. WET f)(. .\.ro.c... fl(h" T-'!. s t: II All E. (Y\f-J4-~ So;L- ll
'• I<:P ~h· .. ..l~- Sb1As il-t {3q Cd
rYfP-3~-1 So\L- l( II C. e... L.r, Co Clt F-e. Ph.~n1~~.
ImP-34-1 ~-o t'\.... ,, II rY\ o tJ i, ~ A~A./~:r.· v ~ ~>:, • m P-tiot~ I ~(L-
'7~
L f Vt I :;;;u;; Yr" ll I I r\-'5f fY\0( t 5 (L Uo;.a--au A A ll'\Jho WlP-qa..-a Soh ... It "
" a. 10~ I WtiHrZ.-:~Oil- o.J C~LD/21 t,
r Pho$pkd~.,5v./f:.--lt> .JAI'4t~: ol-\
I
GL..-- - -- -~- ....... -
/. . .
TURNAROUND TIME REQUIRED: (Rush must be approved by th~ Project Manager.~ / Normal Rush~ (Subject to rush surcharge)
~ ) J
I
POSSIBLE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION: (Please indicate if sample(s) are hazardous materials and/or suspected to contain high levels of hazardous substances) Nonhazard __ _ Flammable __ _ Skin Irritant __ _ Highly Toxic ___ · SAMPLE DISPOSAL: (Please indicate disposition of sample following analysis. Lab will charge f~r packing, shipping, and disposal.) Return to Client---
FOR LAB USE ONLY
Receive
WHITE - Original, to accompany samples
YELLOW- Field copy
Date/Time / h<.?"'./ >.'7"1 r ,
/
,-/
Other ________ __
(PleaM Specify)
{~
I
\
R/A Control No. B 77 oo _)
rn
IN~. ..NATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD 48604
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER n1Af~.l:'~T PLAcE. ~wAT / 13'-/(;,L/ or<.. -I r' C/C Control No. A 7 9 6 0 9
LAB DESTINATION ITA~ CE J2.Q rrvs
SAMPLE TEAM MEMBERS I<. AAI2-DAHL ----~~~~~-------------- CARRIER/WAYBILL NO. ---------------- ----------- ----------- ---
Sample Sample Date and Time Sample Container Condition on Receipt Dis.posal Number Location and Description Collected Type Type (Name and Date) Record No. l'YIP-IC\:-1 I I . I
G6rln'1 11\P- ~ 1 5:'.o -~. b 0,-2C:.-r/ IO '3D YDtL 2){;< b 5 &u.v...z. O,U fe!,C ., s' I ~f-b --;). &(/~1C, mP- lo... q. · -to.o ft-2£,-/8 I I() 'I b Sott- 2'1z~< ~ ~ /JJ:> v~ o.u -rc~ ~olin~ ()1P- ~(\
I / ,
2Yz_" b 5~_q.voL lmP-Jq-1 '-l.t;" -s-.o fl-26-~8) 0 9tm So;'-" o,J u£ ln1f-J.t-1
~ • •J , / ,I
n'l"l {YJP-'J.q ~-6 ~'f. 6 i-26-<(J 01/0 ~fL. 2.J{)t...b Ske-v.z O,J :J;J£_ lmf-3q-l
(} / ; I'
i)or-ins IYl P -3£\ r;.o - 5'. 5 1-Zb-?/f, t.;;{5D 2L>tL J.k )< & S/.a~.;tl _ o,J 'Lc£ WlP·-~- ~
.·..J I I
1-~-<ik' , I :3 ou 5o/z__ 2Yt.. J( t:, ') ket/<.. z<_• E. ex,{IY'Ic::_ t'Y\ p- :3c.. (0, 0 - I D tl 5 Cl-U IYlf-~a.-1
0 '-1/ / ./ ,
SoiL- ZXxt Ske~".t CJ~RL Sor;,, ('(If- 14 S.o -- S. 5 q-:1b -<l'l )/10 M-~J ~_(J ft// / I
nfR. 111 - a 1 to.o -10, 5' 1-z.b,qZ J/'15 So:t. 2/f)f b s!~tv O,J .£c.( 0 /
Special Instructions: T!-1/2[:[(3) rD ~Jt/£ ( .J !JA-'7 Tvf2N ,4/2-oU/J_O •(7/-r/5 ,14~? .Sq;1'!/'LfJ ~,A.J·UF' 7 Possible Sample Hazards: -
SIGNATURES: (Name, Co
~-PY l~d?J 3 Relinquished By:-------------;--------L~~~~~~~~~~:/~/~~//~-;~/b . 4'~ / I ~ /JI .< P-Vr?<,.A-, /v.Do
2. Relinquisfled By: --------v------------
Received By:
WHITE- To accompany samples
YELLOW- Field copy
Received by:-----------------------
4. Relinquished By:--------------------
Received BY=--------------~-------
rn
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL
SERVICES
·~ ' '
( )
\
)
/
17605 Fabrica Way • Cerritos, California 90701 • 213-921-9831 I 714-523-9200
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS
Prepared for: IT Corporation Date: February 14, 1989
17461 Derian Ave., Ste. 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: K. Aardahl
Date Received: January 20, 1989 P.O. Number 240821-02
Two (2) soil samples labeled:
Market Place Swat
"MP-5-1"
"MP-5-2"
Job Number 50187 /djj
The samples were extracted according to CAC Title 22 procedures and the resulting solutions were analyzed for the parameters as requested. The results are listed in Table I.
The samples were analyzed for aromatic volatile hydrocarbons according to a modified EPA Method 8020 using a Tekmar liquid sample concentrator and a gas chromatograph equipped with a photoionization detector. The results are listed on the following summary sheets.
The samples were analyzed for halogenated volatile organics according to a modified EPA Method 8010 using a Tekmar liquid sample concentrator and a Varian 6500 gas chromatograph equipped with a Hall electrolytic conductivity detector. The r'esul ts are listed on the following summary sheets.
The samples were analyzed for general chemistry parameters. The results are listed in Table II.
Reviewed and Approved
Ken Faust
Technical Director
Accredited by the Amencan lndustnal Hyg1ene Assoc1at1on
IT CORPORATION
IT-Irvine Job 1150187
(\ K. Aardahl Page 2 - I
Table I
Metals Analysis Summary (STLC)
Detection
Parameter Method* Limit Units MP-5-1 MP-5-2
Antimony 6010 0.06 mg/L ND<0.6 ND<0.6
Arsenic 7060 0.01 mg/L ND<O. 1 ND<O. 1
Barium 6010 0.2 mg/L ND<2 ND<2
Beryllium 6010 0.00.5 mg/L ND<0.05 ND<0.05
Cadmium 6010 0.005 mg/L ND<0.05 ND<0.05
Calcium 6010 5 mg/L 1280 300
Chromium 6010 0.01 mg/L ND<O. 1 ND<O. 1
Cobalt 6010 0.05 mg/L ND<0.5 ND<0.5
Copper 6010 0.03 mg/L ND<0.3 0.3
Iron 6010 0. 1 mg/L 39 40
Lead 6010 0.2 mg/L ND<2 ND<2
Manganese 6010 0.02 mg/L 17 5.9
Mercury 7470 0.0002 mg/L ND<0.0007 · ND<0.0007
Molybdenum 6010 0.05 mg/L ND<0.5 ND<0.5 -
\ Nickel 6010 0.04 mg/L ND<0.4 ND<0.4
l Potassium 7610 5 mg/L ND<50 ND<50
Selenium 7740 0.005 mg/L ND<0.05 ND<0.05
Silver 6010 0.01 mg/L ND<O. 1 ND<O. 1
Thallium 6010 0.5 mg/L ND<5 ND<5
Vanadium 6010 0.05 mg/L ND<0.5 . ND<0.5
Zinc 6010 0.02 mg/L 0.4 0.4
'
* sw 846, 3rd Edition
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit.
I - /
IT-Irvine
~ K. Aardahl
i
·'-....,.
Parameter
Chloride
Conductivity
Nitrate
pH
Phosphate
Sulfate
Method A
300
120. 1
300
9045a
300
300
Table II
General Chemistry
Units MP-5-1
· mg/kg* ·8000
umhos/cm* 3190
mg/kg* 26
pH* 9.2
mg/kg* ND<39**
mg/kg* 5000
*-Soil was extracted 1:10 with deionized water.
** - Phosphate was reanalyzed from a different H20 extraction.
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. ~ EPA 600/4-79-020
a - SW846 - 3rd Edition
IT CORPORATION
MP-5-2
5300
2070
9.2 10. 1
Job 1!50 187
ND<9.9**
1300
IT CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No ·--~5..:..0..:...,18:;..;7~-=-=------::::-:----
Client _____ ~M=a~r~k~e..:..t~P~l~a~c~e~S~w=a..:..t __ _ Project~--------------------Client No. _____________________ __ Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Field Sample No. ______ ..:..M~P_-~5~-~1~-----------
Analysis No. J0231002 Date Collect-e~d--------71..:..-~19~-~8~9~---------- Date Received ______ --~1_-~2~0-~8~9~-----------
Date Analyzed ______ --~1-~2~3~-~8~9~----------
QC Report No. _____ ...;:8~0~2~0_-8:::...9"--.....:1 ____ _ Sample Matrix:
I I Water (ugll)
1-x-1 Soil (uglkg) Dilution Factor __ ~N~A~-------------------- 1 I Other ------------------------------------------------------------ Spike Source ---------------------------------------------------------------- Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzene 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Ethyl benzene 5 ND<5
Toluene 5 ND<5
_Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes) 5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit. -,
' I
r~
( )
IT CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Aromatic Volatile Hydrocarbons
EPA Method 8020
Job No. 50187
Client Market Place Swat
Project~-----------------------
Client No·-------------Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sample Matrix:
Field Sample No. ---..:.,;M:;:_P_-.;..5-..,.:2~,.-------- Analysis No. J0231004 Date Collec t-ed-:--------:-1..:..-719'="'-'-:8::-:9:-:--------- Date Received 1-20-89
--------~~~~------------Date Analyzed _____ ~1-~2~3~-~8~9 _______ __ QC Report No. ____ ....;8;...;;0;..;;;2~0_-8.;;.;9"----'1'------ I I Water (ugll)
1-x-1 Soil (uglkg) Dilution Factor NA
1_1 Other ------------------------------------~=======================~-Spike Source ----------------------------------------------------------------- Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Benzene 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5 .
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Ethyl benzene 5 ND<5
Toluene 5 ND<5
Xylenes (Dimethyl benzenes) 5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was ·not detected at or above the stated detection limit . . __/)
(
\
IT CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
Job No. 50187
Client Market Place Swat
Project~------------------------
Clien t No.-----------,.--Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sample Matrix:
I I Water (ugll)
I X I Soil (uglkg)
Field Sample No . _ ___;;M...;,;P""""--=5:---.,...;1~----------- Analysis No. J0231011 Date Collect-e~d---~1~-~1~9~-~8~9~------- Da te Recei ved ____ -:.1_-~20~-_,8~9~-----
Date Analyzed ___ ~1_-~2~3-.,...;8~9~------
QC Report No. ___ 8.::..0=-1.:....:0=--....::::8;.:::::8_-2:...:_1 ___ _ Dilution Factor ____ ~N~A~---------------
1 ___ 1 Other ___________________________________________________ __ Spike Source ___________________________________________________________ __ Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5 -
' I
Bromoform 5 ND<5
Bromomethane 5 ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
)
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform 5 ND<5
2-Chloroethyl vinvl ether 5 ND<5
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
1 2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
~ichlorodifluoromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
0,
\ '
Compound
1i1-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloroethane
1 1-Dichloroethylene
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
1,2-Dichloro~ropane
1,3-Dichloro~ropylene
1,1 2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1 1,1-Trichloroethane
1 1~2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY ,
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
Field Sample Number: MP-5-1
Concentration Retention Time
Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
I
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
I
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at or above the stated detection limit.
IT CORPORATION
Notes
'
IT CORPORATION
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
Job No. ---=-:5..;..0-'-:18.;....:7-:---=-:----=----:----Client ____ ~M~a~r~k~e~t~P~l~a~c~e~S~w~a..;..t ______ _ Project~------------------------
Cl ien t No.---------------------Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Sample Matrix:
I I Water (ugll)
I X I Soil (uglkg)
Field Sample No. __ ~M~P~-~5~-~2~--~-------
Analysis No. J0231011 Date Call ec t-ed-:'--__...;:....:1 -:.:1?:9:..:..-~8-=-9 ..:....._ ____ _ Date Received 1-20-89
------~~~~----------
Date Analyzed ______ ~1~-~23~-~8~9~----------
QC Report No. ____ 80..;...1.;....;0;;....-...;;;8...;;;.8_-2;;;;..1-'------ Dilution Factor NA
----~..;....... ______________ _
I I Other ____________________________________________________________ __ Spike Source ________________________________________________________________ __ Concentration Retention Time
Compound Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2 Notes Bromodichloromethane 5 ND<5 -
I
}Bromoform 5 ND<5
Bromomethane. 5 ND<5
Carbon tetrachloride 5 ND<5
Chlorobenzene 5 ND<5
Chloroethane 5 ND<5
Chloroform ' 5 ND<5
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether 5 ND<5
Chloromethane 5 ND<5
Dibromochloromethane 5 ND<5
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1,3-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
1 4-Dichlorobenzene 5 ND<5
ryichlorodifluoromethane 5 ND<5
Continued
)
I
I
Compound
1 1-Dichloroethane
1 2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,3-Dichloropropylene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1 1~1-Trichloroethane
1 1t2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene .
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
Halogenated Volatile Organics
EPA Method 8010
Field Sample Number: MP-5-2
Concentration Retention Time
Det. Lim Column 1 Column 2 Column 1 Column 2
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5 ND<5
5· ND<5
5 ND<5
ND - The analyte was not detected at· or above the stated detection limit.
IT CORPORATION
Notes
-
' ~
""·~;.~ 5018 7 ~) ~
A/ A Control No. 8 -/J 0,"1/
-~-
[D
~- . fERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
A 79633 C/C Control No.
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER ~#f.;· /-'l,A-c,£,. S'wA--T. LAB DESTINATION ~.Z77/S C~IT'l'JJ SAMPLE TEAM MEMBERS ~;(-=-e_ .. _4_=~:!..:.1U>~4:....;...:.,;J.J.:....:L=-------- CARRIER/WAYBILL NO. ---------------- Sample Sample ;· Date and Time Sample Container Condition on Receipt Disposal ..
Number Location and Description ' Collected Type Type (Name and Date) Record No. flJfJ-5-l WrLII mfJ-5 i. () '-s: ~I&_;_, ;,_.,J, 1-19-W 11.1~ Son .. 27-vtl. ss. £~~ o..v:r~ lfJJP-5 .... 2.. t.J~tl m!'-s
I · I -
, v
/0.()-10.5
1 11.~ .. -4 1-1~-rt IL/'(o SDIL z~t,s.s. ~~ ~A./ Zc.E. , 7 "' /Q /
/ . / ,·/ ..
-
/·
~
v /
'/
;
/
'
/ .,
"
/ / / ·/. / / v /
, .
/ ..
/ ' /
:
L ..
Speciallnstructioni:. I L.j do/ htJ I d¢.g/. h M.e. .{:;e.~ /- I 'J- 9'7. k Possi.ble Sample Hazards: - dou [, -
SIGNATURES: (Name, Company, Date and Time) 1'
1. Relinquished By: ~· tb.~M llctJ-<J'f,:LT~,.,;~(Ii!£>3. Relinquished By:-,------------------ Received By: ~· 1, -M g~~A·M. Receivedby:_··-----------------
2. Relinquished By: 4. Relinquished By: ------------------ Received By:
WHITE -To accompany samples
YELLOW • Field copy
, Received By: _____________________ _
)
C-1 10M
ASSOCIATED. LABORATORIES
806 North Batavia - Orange, California 92668 - 7141771-6900 CLIENT
SAMPLE
Edward s. Babcock & Sons, Inc.
P.O. Box 432
Riverside, CA 92502
Attn: Judy Baker
Water
IDENTIFICATION Market Place Landfill
Project #240827-04
BASED ON SAMPLE As Submitted
Total organic Carbons (TOC)
MP-1 9 mg/1
MP-2 14 mg/1
MP-3 72 mg/1
MP-4 24 mg/1
MP-Blank <2 mg/1
ES
(1124)
Total
LAB NO. F55486
REPORTED 11/14/88
RECEIVED 10/24/88
Organic Halides (TOX)
0.15 mgjl
0.80 mgjl
2.4 mg/1
1.0 mgjl
0.016 mg/1
NOTE: Unless notified in writing, all samples will be discarded by appropriate disposal protocol 3 0 days from date rl~P/iFJG~~NsuLTJNG The r·eports of the Associated Laboratories are confidential property of our clients and may not be reproduced or used for publication in part or in full without our written permission. This is for the mutual protection of the public, our clients, and ourselves.
Chemical·
Microbiological •
Environmental •
• BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
ESTABLISHED 1908
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
11/28/88
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Lab No. 881021-193
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 Marketplace
Landfill water sample
MP-1
Parameter Name . Results
Total Hardness as CaCOa 7300 mg/L
Calcium (Cal 425 mg/L
(- -,gnesium
I
(Mg) 1500 mg/L
Jdium (Na) 14000 mg/L
Potassitml (K) 575 mg/L
Total Cations 770 me/L
Total Alkalinity as CaCOa 880 mg/L
Hydroxide (OH) none rng/L
Carbonate (COa) none rng/L
Bicarbonate (HCOa ) 1075 mg/L
Sulfate (S04) 3420 rng/L
Chloride (Cl) 23000 mgjL
Nitrate (NOa) ·250 mgjL
Total Anions 740 me/L
Specific Conductance 61600 J..Ullho/cm
pH 7.6 units
Total Filterable Residue 42000 rngjL
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS 18 rng/L
Chemical Oxygen Demand 25 rng/L
Fluoride (F) 0.6 mg/L
Oil and Grease <1 rng/L
Total Phosphorus (P) 40 mg/L
Silica (Si~) 9 mg/L
Invoice No. 94697
Suhnitted
DLG
10/21/88
13:30
I Sampled
IDLG
110/19/88
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results
Antimony (Sb) 1 mgjL
Arsenic (As) <0.05 rng/L
Barium (Ba.) <0.1 mg/L
.Beryllium (Be) <0.05 mg/L
Cadmium (Cd) <0.01 mg/L
Total Chromium (Cr) <0.1 mg/L
Cobalt (Co) <0.05 mg/L
Copper (CU) 0.06 rng/L
Iron (Fe) <0.05 rng/L
Lead (Pb) <0.3 mg/L
Manganese (Mn) 1.8 rng/L
Molyl:xien~ (Mo) <0.5 rngjL
·Nickel (Ni) <0.05 mg/L
Silver (Ag) <0.05 mg/L
Thallitml (Tl) 0.6 mg/L
Vanadium (V) <0.5 mg/L
Zinc (Zn) <0.05 mg/L
~ .
Notes: Metals analyses run on samples filtered and preserved in field. cc:
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 694-1881
LABORATORIES
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
ESTABLISHED 1906
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
P.O. BOX432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
11/28/88
To: International Te6h. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Lab No. 881021-194
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 Marketplace
Landfill water sample
MP-2
Parameter Name
Total Hardness as Ca<::X)a
Calcium (Ca)
Magnesium ( Mg)
rlium (Na)
Jtassium (K)
· Total Cations
Total Alkalinity as CaOOa
Hydroxide ( OH)
Carbonate ( COa )
Bicarbonate (HOOa)
Sulfate ( S04 )
Chloride (Cl)
Nitrate (NOa )
Total Anions
Specific Conductance
pH
Total Filterable Residue
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Fluoride (F)
Oil and Grease
Total Phosphorus ( P)
Silica ( Si~ )
Results
15300 mg/L
780 mg/L
3200 mg/L
31000 mg/L
275 mg/L
1660 me/L
1230 mg/L
none mg/L
none mg/L
1500 mg/L
8700 mgjL
50500 mg/L
330 mgjL
1630 me/L
108000 IJ.lll}lo/cm
7.3 units
75200 mg/L
25 mgjL
35 mg/L
1 mg/L
<1 mgJL
56 mgjL
6 mg/L
Invoice No. 94697
Suhnitted
DLG
10/21/88
13:30
I Sampled
DLG
110/19/88
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name
Antimony ( Sb)
Arsenic (As)
Barium (Ba)
Beryllium (Be)
Cadmium ( Cd)
Total Chromium (Cr)
Cobalt (Co)
Copper (Cu)
Iron (Fe)
Lead (Pb)
Manganese ( Mn)
Molybdenum ( Mo)
Nickel (Ni)
Silver (Ag)
Thallium (Tl)
Vanadium ( V)
Zinc (Zn)
Results
<1 mg/L
<0.1 mg/L
<.0.1 mg/L
<0.05 mg/L
<0.03 mg/L
<0.1 mg/L
0.06 mg/L
0.1 mg/L
0.05 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
2.8 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.05 mg/L
<0.05 mg/L
1.5 mg/L
<0.5 mg/L
<0.05 mg/L
Notes: Metals analyses run on samples filtered and preserved in field. cc:
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 190!1
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 Marketplace
Landfill t-1ater sample
. :IP-3
Parameter Name Results
Total Hardness as CaCOa 8200 mg/L
Calcium (Cal 355 mg/L
Magnesium (Mg) 1750 mg/L
pium (Na) 15800 mg/L
_..>tassium (K) 515 mgjL
Total Cations 864 me/L
Total .~kalinity as CaCOa 2925 mg/L
Hydroxide (OH) none mg/L
Carbonate (COa) none mgJL
Bicarbonate (HCOa) 3570 mgjL
Sulfate (S04) 1430 rng/L
Chloride (Cl) 27000 mg/L
Nitrate (NOa) 320 mgjL
Total Anions 854 me/L
Specific Conductance 68800 umho/cm
pH 7 .. 4 units
Total Filterable Residue 45900 mg/L
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS 19 mg/L
Chemical Oxygen Demand 25 mgjL
Fluoride (F) 2 mg/L
Oil and Grease <1 mg/L
Total Phosphorus (P) 18 mg/L
Silica (Si~) 14 mg/L
11/28/88
Lab No. 881021-195
Invoice No. 94697
Submitted
DLG
10/21/88
13:30
I Sampled
DLG
110/19/88
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results
Antimony (Sb) . <1 mg/L
Arsenic (As) <0.05 mg/L
Barium (Ba) .2.8 mgjL
Beryllium (Be) <0.05 mgJL
CadmiLDn (Cd) <0.01 mg/L
Total Chromium . (Cr) <0.1 mgJL
Cobalt (Co) <0.05 mgJL
Copper (Cu) 0.08 mg/L
Iron (Fe) 0.2 mg/L
Lead (Pb) <0.3 mg/L
Manganese (Mn) 3.0 mgjL
Molyl:xienum (Mo) <0.5 rngjL
Nickel CNi) 0.05 mg/L
Silver (Ag) <0.05 mg/L
Thallium (Tl) 0.8 mg/L
Vanadium (V) <0.5 mg/L
Zinc (Zn) <0.05 mg/L
~otes: Metals analyses run on samples filtered and preserved in field. cc: EDWARD S, BAB1XXX .!< c;:;;,:;::;t
. /..~j
f
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 Marketplace
Landfill water sample
MP-4
Parameter Name Results
Total Hardness as CaC03 3550 rng/L
Calciun (Ca) 850 rng/L.
Ma.gnesiun (Mg) 340 rng/L
1- ~iitnn (Na) 4600 rngjL
.... tassitnn (K) 200 rngjL
Total Cations 276 me/L
Total Alkalinity as CaC03 1425 rng/L
Hydroxide (OH) none rng/L
Carbonate (C03) none rng/L
Bicarbonate (HC03) 1740 rngjL
Sulfate (S04) 1870 rng/L
Chloride (Cl) 6800 rng/L
Nitrate (N03 ) 230 rng/L
Total Anions 263 me/L
Specific Conductance 22000 J.llllho/cm
pH 7.4 units
Total Filterable Residue 11000 rng/L
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS 18 rng/L
Chemical Oxygen Demand 185 rngjL
Fluoride (F) 2 rng/L
Oil and Grease <1 rng/L
Total Phosphorus (P) 32 rng/L
Silica (Si~) 18 rng/L
11/28/88
Lab No. 881021-196
Invoice No. 94697
Submitted Sampled
DLG
10/21/88
13:30
DLG
10/19/88
Chain of Custody on file.: Y
Parameter Name Results
Antimony (Sb) <0.2 rng/L
Arsenic (As) <0.01 rng/L
Ba.ritnn (Ba) <-0 .1 rng/L
Beryllitnn (Be) <0.01 rngjL
Cadmiun (Cd) <0.01 rngjL
Total Chromium (Cr) <0.1 rng/L
Cobalt (Co) <0.01 rng/L
Copper (Cu) 0.02 rng/L
Iron (Fe) 0.04 rng/L
Lead (Pb) <0.1 rngjL
Manganese (Mn) 1.8 rng/L
Molybdenum (Mo) <0.1 rng/L
Nickel (Ni) <0.01 rng/L
Silver (Ag) <0.05 rngjL
Thallium · (Tl) 0.2 rng/L
Vanaditnn (V) <0 .1 rng/L
Zinc (Zn) 0.05 rng/L
Notes:· Metals analyses run on samples filtered and preserved in field. · cc:
(
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
' 3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 Marketplace
Landfill 1.;ater sample
MP-5
Parameter Name Results
Total Hardness as CaC03 <1 mg/L
Calcium (Ca) <1 mg/L
Magnesium ( Mg) <1 mg/L
)<iium (Na) <1 mg/L
_ utassium (K) <1 mgjL
Total Cations 0.00 me/L
Total Alkalinity as CaC03 3 mg/L
Hydroxide (OH) none mg/L
Carbonate (COa) none mg/L
Bicarbonate (HCOJ ) 3 mg/L
Sulfate (S04) <1 mg/L
Chloride (Cl) <1 mg/L
Nitrate (NOJ) <1 mg/L
Total Anions 0.05 me/L
Specific Conductance 2 ~o/cm
pH 8.5 units
Total Filterable Residue <5 mg/L
Biochemical Ox)"gen Demands <1 mg/L
Chemical Oxygen Demand <1 mg/L
Fluoride (F) <0.1 mg/L
Oil and Grease <1 mg/L
Total Phosphorus (P) 0.01. mg/L
Silica (Si~) <1 mg/L
11/28/88
Lab No. 881021-197
Invoice No. 94697
Submitted
DLG
10/21/88
13:30
I Sampled
DLG
110/19/88
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results
Antimony (Sb) <0.2 mgjL
Arsenic (As) <0.01 mgjL
Barium (Ba) <0.1 mg/L
Beryllium (Be) <0.01 mg/L
Cadmium (Cd) <0.001 mg/L
Total Chromium (Cr) <0.01 mg/L
Cobalt (Co) <0.01 mg/L
Copper (Cu) <0.01 mg/L
·Iron (Fe) 0.02 mg/L
Lead (Pb) <0.01 mg/L
~anese (Mn) <0.01 mg/L
Molybdenum (Mo) <0.1 mg/L
Nickel (Ni) <0.01 mg/L
Silver (Ag) <0.01 mg/L
Thallium (Tl) <0.1 mg/L
Vanadium (V) <0.1 mg/L
Zinc (Zn) <0.01 mg/L
\Notes: Metals analyses run on samples filtered and preserved in field. cc: EDWARD S. BAilCCCK & :z;M
L~4C
F) \ '
)
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: 5 December,
International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Ave., Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
1988
Sample Marked:- Marketplace Landfill_#240827-04
Sample # MP-1
P.!?.: .. !: .. !?.:.!!!:.~ .. t~ .. r.. Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
R.~ .. § .. Y.:J .. t.. ( u g I L )
3. 9
ND
ND
ND
Bromomethane ND
Carbon tetrachloride ND
Chlorobenzene ND
Chloroethane ND
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND
Chloroform ND
Chloromethane ND
bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether .ND
Dibromochloromethane ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND
1,1-Dichloroethane ND
1,2-Dichloroethane ND
1,1-Dichloroethene ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND
1,2-Dichloropropane ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND
Ethyl Benzene ND
M~thylene chloride ND
Methyl Ethyl Ketone ND
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 7.4
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND
Tetrachloroethene ND
Toluene ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND
Trichloroethene ND
Trichlorofluorornethane ND
Vinyl 'chloride ND
Xylenes ND
Lab No. 881021-175
Invoice No. 94694
§.Y..P..m.~--~--t...~.-~ ............ § .. !?.:.m . .P..!. .. ~-9.:
By DLG DLG
Date 10121188 10119188
Time 13:30
Test Method: EPA 502.2
J.?. .. ~ .. t~ .. s .. ~..t. .. Q .. D. ...... ~.!..!!!:.tt ( ug I L )
1. 00
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 1. 00
0.50 0.50
5.00 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50-
0.50 0.20
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
5.00 5.00
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 1. 00
0.50 BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
,------"\ LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
) 3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: 5 December, 1988
International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Ave., Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: Marketplace Landfill #240827-04
Sample # MP-2 ~
P..?.:.:r. .. ?.:~.~ .. t. .. ~ .. r.. g.~ .. :?. .. Y.:.J.: .. t.. ( u g I L ) Acetone ND
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane'
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
~rans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethyl Benzene
Methylene chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyt Isobutyl Ketone
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
9.4 13.4
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND = None Detected Date Analysis Completed:
Chain of Custody on File
Edwa
Lab No. 881021-176
Invoice No. 94694
§ .. ~ .. 9..~.t. .. :t...:t...~.s!.. ........... § .. ?.: .. ~.P.J .. ~ .. 9: By DLG DLG Date 10121188 10119188
Time 13:30
Test Method: EPA 502.2
.~ .. §..t .. ~ . .9. .. t. ... t9..Il: .. _ .. ~.!.m..tt.. ( u g I L )
1. 00
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 1. 00
0.50 0.50
5.00 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.20 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 5.00
5.00 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
1. 00
·o. so
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
ESTABLISHED 1908 CALIF. Dl:iS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: 5 December, 1988
International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Ave., Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: Marketplace Landfill #240827-04
Sample # MP-3
Parameter .....................................................
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethyl Benzene
Methyle~e chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes
R.~ . .§ .. !!.+. .. :t.. ( ug I L )
2.0 800
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
100
ND
8.4 26
ND
ND
3 0 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Lab No. 881021-177
Invoice No. 94694
§_!d.Q!!!:.!. .. :t. .. :t. .. ~.4--···--·.§ .. ~ .. f!!:.P-1.~.q By DLG DLG
Date 10121188 10119188
Time 13:30
Test Method: EPA 502.2
P.~.t~ . .9. .. t..i . .9 .. !LJ:! .. !..m.:i: . .:t.. ( u g I L l
1. 00
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 •1 0 00
0.50 0.50
5.00 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.20 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 5.00
5.00 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
1. 00
0.50 BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: 5 December, 1988
International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Ave., Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: Marketplace Landfill #240827-04
Sample # MP-4
P..9.: .. !: .. ~.ill.~ .. t...~.T.
·Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloro~thylvinyl
Chloroform
ether
Chloromethane
bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1~Dichloroethene
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethyl Benzene
Methylene chloride
Methyl ~thyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes
ND = None Detected
Chain of Custody on
R.~ .. ~.Y.1 .. t.. ( ug I L ·)
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Lab No. 881021-178
Invoice No. 94694
.9. .. ~ .. 1?..!!! .. i. .. t. .. t...~.9: ............. .9..~-~ . .P..1 .. ~ .. 9:. By DLG DLG Date 10121188 10119188
Time 13:30
Test Method: EPA 502.2
.!?. .. ~ .. t..~ .. £!.t.9.!! ....... !:!j.m:.t...t.. ( u g I L )
1. 00
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 1. 00
0.50 0.50
5.00 0.50
0.50 0.50
·0. 50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.20
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
·o.so
0.50 5.00
5.00 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
1. 00
0.50 BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
ESTABLISHED 19011 CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 684-1881
~~ "' LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~ I 3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: 5 December, 1988
International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Ave., Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: Marketplace Landfill #240827-04
Sample # MP-Blank
.P.~.!;..~~et~£. B~§Jd.l t. ( ug/L)
Acetone ND
Benzene ND
Bromodichloromethane ND
Bromoform ND
Bromomethane ND
Carbon tetrachloride ND
Chlorobenzene ND
Chloroethane ND
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether ND
Chloroform ND
Chloromethane ND
bis (2-Chloroethyl) ether ND
Dibromochloromethane ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND
1,3~Dichlorobenzene ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND
Dichlorodifluoromethane ND
1,1-Dichloroethane ND
1,2-Dichloroethane ND
1,1-Dichloroethene ND
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND
1,2-Dichloropropane ND
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND
Ethyl Benzene ND
Methylene chloride ND
Methyl Ethyl Ketone ND
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone ND
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND
Tetrachloroethene ND
Toluene ND
1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND
1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND
Trichloroethene ND
Trichlorofluoromethane ND
Vinyl chloride ND
Xylenes ND
Lab No. 881021-179
Invoice No. 94694
§..!:!.Qm.i.t ted-· .. ···-s 8:.~ p 1 eq
By DLG DLG
Date 10/21/88 10/19/88
Time 13:30
Test Method: EPA 502.2
P.~.~.~9..t..L<?.!l. ... .1 .. !.m_tt. ( ug I L )
1. 00
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 1. 00
0.50 0.50
5.00 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.20 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 5.00
5.00 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
0.50 0.50
1. 00
0.50 ND = None Detected Date Analysis Completed: 11/04/88 Chain of Custody on File {tj~J; __ ~-Jf- ~
E:dwa~~s·:·rn:c .. : ..
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92S02))ate of Report: 11/28/88
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: Pj#240827-04 Marketplace
Landfill -.:.;ater sample
~"lP-2
Lab No. 881021-212
Invoice No. 94700
Customer No. in0292
Submitted
By DLG
Date 10/21/88
Time 13:30
I Sampled
DLG
10/19/88
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Base Neutral and Acid Rxtractable Compounds
EPA Method 625
Parameter
(
Results( ug/L l Parameter Results( ug/L ) Parameter Results( ug/L Base/leutral Eitractables ............................................ .
Acenaph thene liD
Acenaphthylene liD
Anthracene }JD
Aldrin liD
Benzo(a)anthracene liD
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND
Benzo(klfluoranthene }lD
Eenzo(a)pyrene ND
Benzo(gti);erylene ~lj)
Bm;l bt;tyl phthalate liD
HHC ~D
S-BHC ND
3is(2-chloroethyl)ether }lD
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND
Bis(2-eth/lhexyl)phthalate ND
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ~ID
4-Brcmophenyl phenyl ether ND
Chlordane ND
2-Chloronaphthalene ~
4-Chlorcphenyl ph~nyl ether ND
Ghryse~e ND
4-Chlm-3-u:ethyl;henol ND
2-Chlorophenol ND
2,4-Dichlorcphenol ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
·Benzidine
a-BHC
y-BHC
ND
liD
ND
4,4' -DDD ND
4 ,4'-DDR ND
4,4'-DDT ND
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND
Di-n-butylphthalate ND
1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND
1,2-Dichlcrobenzene ND
!,4 .. Dich1Jrobenzene ND
2,2'-Dichlorcbenzidine ND
Dieldrin ND
Diethyl phthalate ND
Dimethyl phthalate ND
2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND
2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND
~i-n-octylphthalate ND
Endosulfan sulfate ND
Endrin aldehyde ND
Fluoranthene ND
Fluorene ND
Heptachlor ND
Heptachlor epoxide ND
Acid Rrtractables
2,4-Dinitrophenol ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
2-Nitrophenol ND
4-Nitrophenol · ND
Additional Rrtractable Pa.raaeters
Endosulfan I ND
Endosulfan II ND
Rndrin ND
ND=None detected, detection limit:
Date analysis completed: 11/10/88
Notes:
Hexachlorobenzene ND
Hexachlorobutadiene ND
Hexachloroethane ND
Ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND
Isophorone ND
Naphthalene ND
Nitrobenzene ND
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylaaine ND
PCB-1016 ND
PCB-1221 ND
PCB-1232 ND
PCB-1242 }lD
PCB-1248 ND
PCB-1254 ND
PCB-1250 ND
~henanthrene ND
Py~ene ND
Toxaphene ND
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Pentachlorophenol ND
Phenol ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND
lllllllllltllltllltttltlllllllltlllflll
Hexachlbrocyclopentadiene ND
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND
NI=Not identifiable
cc: EDWARD S. BABCOCK cr::;w . J_~f
I
) \
' .. .-
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
ESTABLISHED 1906 CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BbX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502Date of Report: 11/28/88
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian.Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: Pj#240827-04 Marketplace
Landfill water sample
MP-1
Lab No. 881021-211
Invoice No. 94700
Custqmer No. in0292
Submitted Sampled
By DLG
Date 10/21/88
Time 13:30
DLG
10/19/88
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Base Neutral and Acid Rxtractable Compounds
EPA ~ethod 625 )
Parameter Results( ~g/L Parameter Results( ~g/L ) Parameter Results( ~g/L Base/lleutral Eitractables. , . , . , ....................................... .
Acenaph thene ND 4, 4' -DDD ND Hexachlorobenzene ND
Acenaphthylene ND 4,4'-DDE ND Hexachlorobutadiene ND
Anthracene ND 4,4'-DDT ND Hexachloroethane ND
Aldrin ND Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND Ideno ( 1,2, 3 -cd) pyrene ND Benzo(a)anthracene ND Di-n-butylphthalate ND Isophorone ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND Naphthalene ND Benzo(k)flucranthene ND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND Nitrobenzene ·ND Benzo (a) pyrene ND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND · Benzo(ghi)perylene ND 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND PCB-1016 ND Benzyl butyl phthalate ND Dieldrin ND PCB-1221 ND
b-BHC ND Diethyl phthalate ND PCB-1232 ND
o-BHC ND Dimethyl phthalate ND PCB-1242 ND
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether ND 2,4-Dinitrotoluene ND. PCB-1248 ND Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ND 2,6-Dinitrotoluene ND PCB-1254 ND Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND Di-n-octylphthalate ND PCB-1260 ND Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND Endosulfan sulfate ND Phenanthrene ND 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND Bndrin aldehyde ND Pyrene ND Chlordane ND Fluoranthene ND Toxaphene ND
2-Chloronaphthalene ND Fluorene ND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND Heptachlor ND
Chrysene ND Heptachlor epoxide ND
lttflllllllllltlllllllllfllllllllllfllllf Acid lrtractables ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,, 4-Chloro-3-methylphenol ND 2,4-Dinitrophenol ND Pentachlorophenol ND 2-Chlorophenol ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND Phenol ND 2,4-D~chloroph~nol liD 2-Nitrophenol ND 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 2,4-Dimethylphenol ND 4-Nitrophenol 'ND
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Additional Xxtractable Paraleters Benzidine ND Endosulfan I
a-BHC liD Endosulfan II
y-BHC ND Endrin
ND=None detected, detection limit:
Date analysis ·co~pleted: 11/10/88
Notes:
cc:
ND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND
ND Hitrol\odimethylamine ND
ND N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND
10 llg/L NI=Not identifiable
)
/
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502Da,te of Report: 11/28/88
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample ~rked: Pj#240827-04 Marketplace
Landfill water sample
MP-3
Lab No. 881021-213
Invoice No. 94700
Customer ~o. in0292
Submitted
By DLG
:Bate 10/21/88
Time 13:30
Sampled
DLG
10/19/88
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Base Neutral and Acid Extractable Compounds
Paraineter Results(
............. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Acenaphthene ND
Acenaphthylene liD
Anthracene liD
Aldrin ND
Benzo(a)anthracene liD
Benzo(b)f:~orantbene liD
3enzo(k)fluora~~hene tiD
Benzc(a)pyrene ND
3enzc ~ gh:; pery 1::ne liD
Ee~zyl :utrl ~htha:1te ~m
b-EHS }ill
o-BHC liD
Bis(2-cblorcethyl)ether liD
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)meth~1e liD
Bi>(2-:thylhexyl)phthalate. 30
B io ( ~-chloroisoprop]l) ether liD
4-Bromophenyl phenyl e:her liD
Chlordane ND
~-Chlorona~h thalene ND
4-Chlorcphenyl phenyl ether liD
8hr7sene ND
4-:hloro-3-meth]lphenol liD
2-Chlorophenol liD
Z 1 4-9:~hlcrophenol liD
Z,4-Di~ethylphenol ~
~enzidine
a-BHG
y-BHG
liD
llD
liD
ug/L
(
)
EPA Method 625 )
Parameter Results ( ug/L ) Parameter Results ( ug/L
Base/lleutral Ritractables ............................................ . 4141 -DDD ND
41 4
1 -DDE }ffi
4 I 4 I -DDT ND
Dibenzo(a1 h)anthracene ND
Di-n-but;:phthalate ND·
11 3-Cichlorobenzene ND
; 1 ~-Dichl"robenzene ND
1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND
313
1 -Dichlorobenzidine ND
~ieldrin ~~
Diethyl phth1late ND
Jimethyl phthalate ND
2~4-Dinitrotoluene
215-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-cctylphthalate
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Fluoranthene
Fl<1orene
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
liD
~
56 liD
ND
ND
~m
~m
ND
Acid Ertractables
2~4-Dinitrophenol ~~
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
2-Nitrophenol liD
4-Nitrophenol ND
Hexachlcrobenzene liD
Hexachlorobutadiene ND
Hexachloroethane ~!])
Iceno(!1 21 3-cd)pyrene ND
Isophorone ND
~laphthalene ND
iii trobenzene ND
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine liD
PGB-1016 ND
PGB-1221 liD
PGB-1232 liD
PGB-1Z42 ND
PGB-1248 :m
PGB-1254. ND
PGB-1260 ~~
Phenanthrene ND
Pyrene }ill
Toxaphene ND
112, 4-l'richlorobenzene ND
Pentachlorophenol · ND
Phenol ND
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol ND
· Additional Ritractable Paraleters ............................ ,,,,,,,,,,, Endosulfan I liD ·Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND
Endosulfan II ND N-Nitrosodimethylamine ~~
Endrin liD N-Ni trosodipheny lamine liD
ND=None detected, detection limit: 10 Jlg/L NI=~ot identifiable Date analysis completed: 11/10/88
Notes:
cc: EDWARD S. BA.BCCXX & bb
L~JC
)
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED eSTABLISHED 190e
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92SO:illate of Report: 11/28/88
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian AYenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: Pj#240827-04 ~~rketplace
Landfill ~ater sample
MP-4
Lab No. 881021-214
Invoice ~o. 94700
Customer No. in0292
Submitted
By DLG
Date 10/21/88
Time 13:30
Sampled
DLG
10/19/88
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Base ~reutral and Acid E.."-::tractable Compounds
EPA Method 625
Pa:'l!:leter Pa~a:neter Results( u&/L · i Parameter Results( ~g/L Base/llentral Rxtractables . , ............... : ................. , .... , , .. .
A~enaphthene iiD 4,4'-DDD liD Herachlorcbenzene ND
Acenaphthylene liD 4,4'-DDE liD Hexachlorobutadiene ND
Anthracene liD 4,4'-DDT ND Hexachloroethane ~m
Aldrin liD Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND Ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND Benzo(a)anthracene liD Di-n-butylphthalate liD r ' .sopnorone ND Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND 1,3-Dichlorcbenzene ND Naphthalene ND Benzo(k)fluoranthene ~lD 1,:-D:JhlorGbenzene liD ilitrobenzene liD Benzo (a) py~.:ne liD 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine ND 3enzo{ghi}pe:J:2ne HD 3, 3'.-Dichlorobenzidine liD PCB-1016 NJ)' Benzyl butyl ~hthalate ND Dieldrin ND PCB-1221 ND
b-BHC liD Diethyl phthalate ND PCB-1232 ND
5-BHC HD Dimethyl phthalate liD PCB-1242 ND
Bis(2-chlcroethyl)ether ND 2,4-Dinitrotoluene liD PCB-1248 liD Bis(2-chloroethoxy)~ethane liD 2,6-Dinitrotoluene liD PCB-1254 liD Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate ND Di·n-octylphthalate liD PCB-1260 liD Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether ND Endosulfan sulfate liD Phenanthrene ND . 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether ND Endrin aldehyde ND Pyrene ND Chlordane ND Fluoranthene ND Toxaphene ND
2-Chloronaphthalene ND Fluorene ilD 1,2,4-Trichlcrobenzene ND 4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND Heptachlor )/])
Chrysene liD Heptachlor epoxide ND
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ...... Acid Rrtractahles 4-Shloro-3-methylphenol ND 2,4-Dinitrophenol )/]) Pentachlorophenol ND 2-Chlorophenol ND 2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND Phenol liD 2,4-Jichloropheno! }JD 2-Nitrcphenol ND 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND 2,4-Dirnethylphenol }/r Hitrcphenol liD
................................ Additional Rrtractable Paraaeters ~en~idine ND Er.dosulfan I ND Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND J-BHC ND Endosulf an II liD N-Nitrosodi~ethylamine ND
y-3HC . ND Endrin ND H-Ni trosodipheny lamine liD
ND=None detected, detection limit: 10 llg/L NI=~ot identifiable Date analysis completed: 11/10/88
Notes:
cc: EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS~
L~JCL
' I
~~" , I
)
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1908
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502Date of Report: 11/28/88
To: International Tech. Corp.
17~61 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 9271~
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample :hrked: Pj:'!:2-W827-04 ~rketplace
Landfill water sample
YIP-Blank
Lab No. 881021-215
Invoice No. 9~700
!Customer ~o. in0292
I
Submitted
By DLG
Date 10/21/88
Time 13:30
Sampled
DLG
10/19/88
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Base :.reutral and Acid Extractable Compormd.s
EPA Method 625
Parameter ~e,alts( ~g/~ Parameter Results( ug/L ) Parameter Results( ug/L ..................................
Acenaphthene ND
Acenaph':h7lene ND
. .\n thracene ml
Hdrin ND
Benzo(a)anthracene ND
Benzo(b)fluoranthene ND
Benzo(k)flaoranthene N'D
Benzo(a)pyrene ND
Benzo(gbi)perylene ND
Eenzyl butyl phthalate ND
b-BHC ND
5-BHC ND
Bis(2-chlcroethyl)ether tiD
Eis(2-chloroethoxy)methane ~D
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)~htbalate )lD
9is(2-chlJroisoprop]l)ether ~ID
Hromopheny l phenyl e :her liD
ChlJrdane ND
Z-Chloronaphthalene -Nil
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether ND
Chrysene NO
4-Chloro-3-!lethylphenol ND
2-Chlorophenol ND
2,4-Di0hlcrcphenol ND
2,4-Dimethylphenol ND
Benzidine ND
a-BHC ND
y-BHC ND
Base/!leutral Kxtractables , , , , , , , , , , , , , , • , , , , , , , , , , . , .•. , , , .... , , . , , , , . 4,4'-DDD ND
4, 4'-DDE ND
4, 4'-DDT ND
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ND
Di-n-butylphthalate ND
1,2-Dichlorobenzene MD
1,2-Dichlorcbenzene ND
1,4-Dichlorcbenzene ND
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine ND
Dieldrin fiD
Diethyl phthalate ND
Di~ethyl phthalate ND
2,4-Dinitrotcluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-:1-octylphthalate
E~dosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
Acid Rrtractables
Z,4-Dinitrophenol ND
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol ND
2-Nitrophenol ND
4-Nitrophenol · NO
Additional Extractable Para~eters
Endosulfan I ND
En:!osulfan E ND
Endrin ND
Hexachlorobenzene ND
Hexachlorobutadiene ND
Hexachloroethane ND
Ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND
Isophorone liD
Naphthalene NO
Nitrobenzene ND
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine HD
PCB-1016 }ID
PCB-1221 ND
PCB-!Z32 ND
PCB-1242 ND
PCB-1248 ND
PCB-1254 ND
PCB-1260 ND
Phenanthrene ND
Pyrene ND
Toxaphene ND
:,2,4-Trichlorobenzene NO
Pentachlorophenol ND
?henol NO
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol ND
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND
N-Nitrosodimethylamine ND
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine ND
~~=None detected, detection limit: 10 l.lg/L NI=Not identifiable Date analysis completed: 11/10/88
Notes:
cc: ~ARD S. BABaXX ~
L~t .
J
. •";i
\ ... ___ / "t" .....: ~ ,. '- .... ("
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
-- ?~t~ $" ~ l'
~ "'::l-;- 0 ~ ·,J.' / J \.....- .. J -~ Qj "- -.3 ...... ,. /
--; l' ., ~' '
'-'"b 3 1""\. J: -:;
. --....- .... ~ .., ....
~roj. No.
yog~ 7
Project Name
rt1t\ '('(..t1 (Lire£ j_riNOPil L
No.
Samp·wz~
of
con
tainers
~ta. No.1 Date c. .D
Time 6 ~1 Station Location
I
·/\ ., II
~FffY'_ ~:1- ___ I -c.
1\~~- ~
~elinquisned by:
(Signature}
!Relinquished by:
(Signature)
··:'..~'
0 u ... u
,/ . W(f(
Date/Time
~~I (3J6
Date/Time
J
Date/Time
I
·.
/f)
g
&
g
t3
.•
VI vt vf v1 ~ ~/I I'll fMc.~ ::. S~Aj ~ ,
./1.--1 ~ ~ ,{~~Be.GICt.Cr.~.tv
, 7 'J •. "'
v1 vi-~ /f./1// /I h. P~ M~t. fr/o. A/;
v ~ ,--t /f ",f ~ K. A4~ At .Til. v 2,
lv1 J-'iyl ~,f~/
0' J 7 I
Relinquished by:
_(Signature)
B,u zffZ.clltJ5e
JoA'o~ Po. Jftos3
Date/Time I Received by
(Signature)
Received by: .
(~gnj~s-e) ..
(; ~~JhA .£/
-ReceivedUby:
(Signature)
.. Relinquished by:
(Signature)
Received for Laboratory by: r Date/Time
(Signature) I
Chain of Custody Record
Date/Time I Received by
I (Signature)
RemarKs
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: .David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs water sample
MP-1
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Chain
Lab No. 890203-320
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 01/31/89
9:10
of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Method 9060
Total Organic Carbon
Practical Quanti tation Limit
Notes:
/
cc:
24 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~-Jfk£r
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
. EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240g27-04 Qrvl-Market
Place SWATs Hater sample
:'-lP-1
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Chain
Lab No. 890203-314
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 01/31/89
9:10 l
of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Method 9020
Total Organic Halides
,/'""jactical Quanti tation Limit
~otes:
cc:
0.57 rng/L
0.25 mgjL
EDWARDS. ~ABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~~~~
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1908
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, I_NC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs water sample
t'-'IP-2
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Chain
Lab No. 890203-321
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 01/31/89
9:10 I
of Custcxiy on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Methcxi 9060
Total ~rganic Carbon
Practical Quantitation Limit
. ----,
)
, Notes:
cc:
12 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC .
. r;f;4;~~
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs water sample
MP-2
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
. 02/27/89
Chain
Lab No. 890203-315
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 01/31/89
9:10
of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Method 9020
Total Organic Halides
Practical Quantitation Limit
)
Notes:
cc:
3.0 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
¢14=f!kLr
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
ESTABLISHED 1908 CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs.Hater sample
MP-3
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIF(JRNIA 92502
02/27/89
Chain
Lab No. 890203-322
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 01/31/89
9:10 I
of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Method 9060
Tota~ Organic Carbon
Practical Quantitation Limit
)
Notes:
cc:
46 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~fllJy
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1908
PHONE (714} 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
P j#240827 -:04 Q:-'1-Market
Place SWATs Hater sample
1'-IP-3
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Chain
Lab No. 890203-316
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 01/31/89
9:10 I
of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Method 9020
Total Organic Halides
· Practical Quanti tat ion Limit
Notes:
cc:
2.7 mg/L
0.5 mg/L
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~~
r
\
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1905
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs water sample
NP-4
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Lab No. 890203-323
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted
DLG
02/03/89
9:10
Sampled
DLG
01/31/89
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Method 9060
Total Organic Carbon
Practical Quantitation Limit
)
Notes:
cc:
15 mg/L
1.0 mg/L
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
()
PHONE (714} 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample M8.rked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs water sample
MP-4
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Chain
Lab No.· 890203-317
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 01/31/89
9:10
of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Method 9020
Total Organic Halides
Practical Quantitation Limit
/ )
Notes:
cc:
1.0 mg/L
0.25 mg/L
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~~--,?
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
ESTABLISHED 1906 CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 664-1661
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17 461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs water sample
MP-5
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Chain
Lab No. 890203-324
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted I Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 I Ol/31!89
9:10 I
of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Hethod 9060
Total Organic Carbon
Practical Quantitation Limit
)
j Notes:
cc:
8.6 mg/L
1.0 mgjL
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~:. ·/fluLr
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING.
ESTABLISHED 1908 CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 684-1881
~~ LABORATORIES
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
\ · 3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs Hater sample
MP-5
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Chain
Lab No. 890203-318
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted I Sampled
DLG IDLG
02/03/89 101/31/89
9:10
of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Method 9020
Total Organic Halides
Practical Quantitation Limit
)
Notes:
cc:
0.65 mg/L
0.25 mg/L
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
cjlt,~~
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1908
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, I_NC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs water sample
MP-Blank (Arrowhead DI
~m.ter)
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Lab No. 890203-325
Invoice No. 97431
Submitted
DLG
02/03/89
9:10
I Sampled
IDLG
IOl/31/89
I
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Method 9060
Total prganic Carbon
Practical Quantitation Limit
'!
\ ,-JD = None Detected at PQL.
· Notes:
cc:
ND rng/L
1. 0 rng/L
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
rja4:..~
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1908
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs water sample
MP-Blank (Arrowhead DI
water)
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
02/27/89
Chain
Lab No. 890203-319
Invoice No. . 97431
Submitted Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 01/31/89
9:10
of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Name Results
EPA Hethod 9020
Total Organic Halides
Practical Quantitation Limit
( I
,.JD = None Detected at PQL.
Notes:
cc:
ND mg/L
0.010 mg/L
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
rjtk~fkJ.y
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs Water
Sample MP-1
Parameter Name
Calcium (Ca)
Sodium . (Na)
...,otassium (K)
.otal Alkalinity as CaC03
· ·Hydroxide ( OH)
Carbonate (~)
Bicarbonate ( HC03 )
Sulfate (S04)
Chloride (Cl)
Nitrate Nitrogen (N'03-N)
Fluoride (F)
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Oil and Grease
Total Phosphorus ( P)
pH
Specific Conductance _
Total Filterable Residue
Results
230 mg/L
'5800 mg/L
214 mg/L
715 mg/L
none mg/L
none mg/L
872 mg/L
2200 mg/L
9000 mg/L
12 mg/L
2.0 mg/L
4 mg/L
100 mg/L
8 mg/L
2.8 mg/L
, 7.4 units
27,300 j..UDho/cm
19,300 mg/L
03/01/89
Lab No. 890203-296
Invoice No. 97 429
Submitted Sampled
DLG
02/03/89
9:10
DLG
1/31
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name
Antimony ( Sb)
Arsenic (As)
Barium (Ba)
Beryllium (Be)
Boron (B)
Cadmium ( Cd)
Total Chromium (Cr)
Cobalt (Co)
Copper (Cu)
Iron (Fe)
Lead (Pb)
Manganese (Mn)
Mercury ( Hg)
Molybdenum (Mo)
Nickel (Ni)
Selenium ( Se)
Silver (Ag)
Zinc (Zn)
Thallium (Tl)
Results
<0.05 mg/L
_0.01 mg/L
<0.1 mgjL
<0.01 mg/L
3.3 mg/L
<0.01 mg/L
<0.01 mg/L
0.01 mg/L
0.03 mg/L
0.04 mg/L
<0.03 rng/L
0.66 mg/L
<0.001 mg/L
<0.1 mg/L
0.01 mg/L
<0.05 rng/L
<0.01 mg/L
0.02 mg/L
0.2 rng/L
Notes: Metals run on samples filtered and preserved in field.
Oil and Grease preserved w/sulfuric acid.
cc:
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~ffkLr
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
ESTABLISHED 1906 CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 684-1881
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
LABORATORIES
' 3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs Water
Sample MP-2
Parameter Name Results
Calcium (Ca) 760 mg/L
Sodium (Na) 30,500 mg/L
Potassium (K) 860 mg/L
'T'otal Alkalinity as Ca.CC>a 632 mg/L
:rcttoxide (OH) none mg/L
Carbonate (COa) none mg/L
Bicarbonate (HCOa) 772 mg/L
Sulfate (804) 10,500 mg/L
Chloride (Cl) 41,000 mg/L
Nitrate Nitrogen (NOa -N) 30 mg/L
Fluoride (F) 1.0 mg/L
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS 4 mg/L
Chemical Oxygen Demand <50 mg/L
Oil and Grease 4 rng/L
Total Phosphorus (P) 1·.4 mg/L
pH 7.4 tmits
Specific Conductance 95,900 J.UDho/cm
Total Filterable Residue 73,500 mg/L
03/01/89
Lab No. 890203-297
Invoice No. 97429
Suhni tted Sampled
DLG DLG
02/03/89 . 1/31
9:10
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results
Antimony (Sb) <0.05 mg/L
Arsenic (As) (0.1 mg/L
Barium (Ba) _(0.1 mg/L
Beryllium (Be) . <0.1 mg/L
Boron (B) 20 rng/L
Cadmium (Cd) <0.01 mg/L
Total Chromium (Cr) <0.01 mg/L
Cobalt (Co) 0.1 mg/L
Copper (Cu) 0.15 rng/L
Iron (Fe) 0.10 rng/L
Lead (Pb) 0.2 mg/L
Manganese (Mn) 2.0 rng/L
Mercury (Hg) <0.001 mg/L
Molybdem.un (Mo) <1 mg/L
Nickel (Ni) 0.2 mg/L
Selenium (Se) <0.1 mg/L
Silver (Ag) <0.05 mg/L
Zinc (Zn) 0.05 mg/L
Thallium (Tl) 2.0 mg/L
Notes·: Metals nm on samples filtered and preserved in field.
Oil and Grease preserved w/sulfuric acid.
co:
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
L!Uy
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
, LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Harked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs· Water
Sample MP-3
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
03/01/89
Lab No. 890203-298
Invoice No. 97429
Suhnitted Sampled
DLG
02/03/89
9:10
DLG
1/31
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter Name Results Parameter Na.e Results
Calcium (Ca) 410 mg/L Antimony (Sb) <0.05 mg/L
Sodium (Na) 18,000 mg/L Arsenic (As) 0.04 mg/L
Potassium (K) 450 mg/L Barium (Ba) - <2 mg/L
"':otal Alkalinity as CaCOa 2788 mg/L Berylliun (Be) 0.01 mg/L .Yrlroxide (OH) none mg/L Boron (B) 9.2 mgjL
Carbonate (COa) none mg/L Cadmillll (Cd) <0.01 mgjL
Bicarbonate (~) 3401 mg/L Total Chromium <cr> <0.01 mg/L Sulfate (SOt) 2400 mg/L Cobalt (Co) 0.02 mg/L
Chloride (Cl) 36,000 mg/L Copper (Cu) 0.06 mgjL
Nitrate Nitrogen (003 -N) 6.1 mgjL Iron (Fe) 0.18 mg/L
Fluoride (F) 2.3 mg/L Lead (Pb) <0.05 mgjL
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS 7 mg/L Manganese (Mn) 0.95 mgjL Chemical Oxygen Demand <50 mgjL Mercury (Hg) <0.001 mg/L Oil and Grease 7 mg/L Molybden\m (Mo) 0.4 mg/L
Total Phosphorus (P) 0.7 mg/L Nickel (Ni) 0.02 mgjL
pH 7.4 units Selenium (Se) <0.1 mg/L
Specific Conductance 65,400 J,,IDh.o/cm Silver (Ag) <0.01 mg/L Total Filterable Resi~ue 43,000 mgjL Zinc (Zn) 0.01 mg/L 'Iball i \.Ill (Tl) 0.3 mg/L
Notes: Metals rtm on samples filtered and preserved in field.
Oil and Grease preserved w/sulfuric acid.
cc:
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth.
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs Water
Sample MP-4
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
03/01/89
Lab No. 890203-299
Invoice No. 97 429
Sul::mi tted. Sampled
DLG
02/03/89
9:10
DLG
1/31
Chain of Custody on file: Y
~r Name Results Pa.raaeter ~ Results
Calcium (Ca) . 290 mgjL Antimony (Sb) <0.1 mg/L
Sodium (Na} 4600 mg/L Arsenic (As) <0.01 mgjL
Pot.assi um (K) 190 mg/L Barium (Ba) _<0.1 mgjL
r' Tptal Alkalinity as Ca~ 1160 mg/L Beryllium (Be) <0.01 mg/L \ Ydroxide (OH) none mg/L (B) 3.8 mg/L Boron ,_
carbonate (~) none mg/L Cadmium (Cd) <0.01 mg/L
Bicarbonate (HOOa) 1415 mg/L Total Chranium (Cr) <0.01 mg/L Sulfate (SOt) 1815 mg/L Cobalt (Co) <0.01 mg/L
Chloride (Cl) 6900 mg/L Copper (Cu) 0.03 mgjL
Nitrate Nitrogen (NOa -N) 9.3 mg/L Iron (Fe) 0.04 mgjL
Fluoride (F) 2.2 mg/L Lead (Pb) <0.05 mgjL
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS 5 mg/L Manganese (Mn) 2.0 mg/L Chemical Oxygen Demand 100 mg/L . Mercury (Hg) <0.001 mg/L Oil and Grease <1 mg/L Molybdenum (Mo) 0.1 mg/L
Total Phosphorus (P) 1.4 mg/L Nickel (Ni) 0.02 mgjL
pH 7.4 tmits Selenium (Se) <0.05 mg/L
Specific Conductance 23,000 J,.UDho/cm Silver (Ag) <0.01 mg/L Total Filterable Residue 14,150 mg/L Zinc (Zn) 0.01 mg/L Thalliun (Tl) 0.1 mg/L
Notes: Metals rtm on samples filtered and preserved in field.
Oil and Grease preservea w/sulfuric acid.
cc:
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~flkulr
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
ESTABLISHED 1906 CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs Water
Sample MP-5
Parameter Name Results
Calcium {Ca) 140 mg/L
Sodium {Na) 4900 mg/L
Potassium {K) 210 mg/L
Total Alkalinity as Ca<:::Oa 705 mg/L
ydroxide {OH-) none mg/L
Carbonate ( c::oa ) none mg/L
Bicarbonate (HCC>:i ) 860 mg/L
Sulfate (S04) 1240 mg/L
Chloride (Cl) 7000 mgjL
Nitrate Nitrogen (NOa -N) 9.3 mg/L
Fluoride (F) 1.8 mg/L
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS 9 mg/L
Chemical Oxygen Demand 50 mgjL
Oil and Grease 1 mg/L
Total Phosphorus (P) 5.6 mg/L
pH 7.7 units
Specific Conductance 23, 000 umho/cm
Total Filterable Residue 12,800 mg/L
03/01/89
Lab No. 890203-300
Invoice No. 97 429
Sul::mi tted Sampled
DLG
02/03/89
9:10
DLG
1/31
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Parameter NaB! Results
Antimony {Sb) <0.05 rng/L
Arsenic {As) <0.01 mg/L
Barium (Ba) _<0.1 mg/L
Beryllium (Be) <0.01 mg/L
Boron (B) 5.0 mg/L
Cadmium (Cd) <0.01 mg/L
Total Chromium (Cr) <0.01 mg/L
Cobalt (Co) <0.01 mg/L
Copper (Cu) 0.02 rng/L
Iron (Fe) 0.03 mg/L
Lead (Pb) <0.05 mg/L
Manganese (Mn) 0.4 mg/L
Mercury (Hg) <0.001 mg/L
Molybdem.un (Mo) 0.1 mg/L
Nickel {Ni) <0.01 mg/L
Selenium (Se) <0.05 mg/L
Silver (Ag) <0.01 mg/L
Zinc (Zn) 0.02 rng/L
Thallium {Tl) 0.1 mg/L
Notes: Metals run on samples filtered and preserved in field.
Oil and Grease preserved w/sulfuric acid.
cc:
EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~~
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, !NC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked:
Pj#240827-04 QM-Market
Place SWATs Water
Sample MP-Blank· Arrowhead
Parameter Name Results
Calcitnn (Ca) 1 mg/L
Soditnn (Na) <1 mg/L
Potassitnn (K) <1 mg/L
~?tal Alkalinity as Ca003 2.5 mg/L
,Ydroxide (OH) none mg/L
Carbonate (~) none mg/L
Bicarbonate (H~). 3 mg/L
Sulfate (SOt) <1 mg/L
Chloride (Cl) <1 mg/L
Nitrate Nitrogen (N03 -N) <0.1 mg/L
Fluoride (F) 0.1 mg/L
Biochemical Oxygen DemandS <2 mg/L
Chemical Oxygen Demand 5 mg/L
Oil and Grease <1 mg/L
Total Phosphorus (P) <0.02 mg/L
pH 6.4 units
Specific Conductance 3.1 wnho/cm
Total Filterable Residue 5 mg/L
03/01/89
Lab No. 890203-301
Invoice No. 97429
Submitted Sampled
DLG
02/03/89
9:10
DLG
1/31
Chain of Custody on file: Y
ParaiEter Name Results
Antimony (Sb) <0.01 mg/L
Arsenic (As) <0.01 mg/L
Baritnn (Ba) <0.1 mg/L
Beryllitnn (Be) <0.01 mg/L
Boron (B) <0.1 mg/L
Cadmitnn (Cd) <0.001 mg/L
Total Chromi tnn (Cr) <0.01 mg/L
Cobalt (Co) <0.01 mg/L
Copper · ( Cu) <0.01 mg/L
Iron (Fe) 0.03 mg/L
Le~ (Pb) <0.005 mg/L
Manganese (Mn) <0.01 mg/L
Mercury (Hg) <0.001 mg/L
Molybdentnn (Mo) <0.1 mg/L
Nickel (Ni) <0.01 mg/L
Selenitnn (Se) <0.005 mg/L
Silver (Ag) <0.01 mg/L
Zinc (Zn) 0.02 mg/L
Thallilllli (Tl) <0.1 rng/L
Notes: Metals run on samples filtered and preserved in·field.
Oil and Grease preserved w/sulfuric acid.
cc:
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
~~?
ACHiCUL.TURAL. CONSUL.TANTS
CHt.:MiSTS
APPkOVt:O WATER LAt:iORATORY
PHONE 684-1681
AHEA COOt: 7 I 4 EDWARDS. BABCOCK 8c SONS. INC.
LABORATORIES
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
P. o. aox 432
RIVERSIDE. CAL.I.FORNIA a2~02.
BASE/NEUTRALS 'AND ACIDS
ORGANIC ANALYSES
Date of Report: ____ ·Mar ___ cl_l_3_o_,_l_9~8_9 ________ Lab Sample ID No. __ 89_o_2_o_3-_3_o_8--------~ Laboratory Signature Lab . i · , /)
Name: E s Babcock & Sons. Inc. Director: Lcu(/{k'~ ./ c1~0 Name of David L. Guth .Sampler I eoJ ' Sampler: EmplQyed By: .T. - · Date/Time Sample Date/Ti~e Sample --~w~e-r-e~H~o~l~d'i_n_g _____ Y_e_s __ __ Collected: 01-31-89 R.ec.-ived @. Lab: 2~3-89 I 0930 'Times Observed? Were all the constituents lis_t_e~d~---
Test Methods: _____ ·6~2~5~/~6~0~8 _____________ : below quantified? Yes ~~~;~~m~~~---T-s~Pr __ o_j_ec_t __ N_o_._2_4_o_a_2_7-_o_4 ______ ~--------------~~:~: ______________ __ Description of Q{-Market Place
Sampling Point:~------------------~~~--------County Name: ______________ __ Name/No. Of Sample Station
source: '1-1P-l Number:
Date &
Time of I I I I I I I Lt..' I .. I
Sample: Y.Y M M 0 D T ~ ~ T
Water
Type:
I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I
User ._I _.__.__.1 Submitted to '~:t:QIS
ID: ay: ______ _
, ; J Place an 11 X11 in box to del~te All date:~.. tor this atationjdatejtime. U REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET · ANALYSES DETECTIC!:
UNITS T CODE RESULTS LIMIT
Date Analyses Completed 73672 8J9 I o13 I 11 0 I I I I I YYMMDD
Analyzing Agency Code (Lab) 28 I I I I
Intensive survey Number 116 _L I_ _I l
uq/L Acenaphthane 34205 _I N ll 5 . o·o
uq/L Acenaphthylene 34200 I _1_ 1 N n 5 . 0 0
uq/L Anthracene 34220 I N n 5 . 0 0
Ug/L Ald}:'~n 39330 I N1D 0 . 011
.u.q/L Benzo(a anthracene 34526 _j _L _j t N l> 1 0 . 010 uq/L Benzo{b}fluoranthene 34230 N I) 1 0 . Q!Q
uq/L Benzo(k )fluoranthene 34242 I N n 1 0 . 0 0
uq/L Benzo(a )pyrene 34247 I I N I) 1 0 . 0 0
uq/L Benzo(ghi)peryleno 34521 I I N I I) 1 0 • _Q__Q_
Uq/L Benzyl butyl phthalate 34292' I I I N I) 1 0 . olo ug/L' B - DHC 39338 1 N n 0 . 0 5
uq/L 6 -·BHC 34259 N Jl) 0 . 0 5
ug/L b1s 2-chloroethyl)ether 3-1273 _j_ _j_ I N I I) 5 . 0 0 ug/L, bis 2-ch1oroethoxv)meth.ane 34278 _I __! N 0 5 . 0 0 Uq/L bis 2-ethylhexyl}~hthalate 39100 N IJ 5 . 0 0
uq/L b1s(2-chloroisopro~yl)ether 34203 _j_ _j_. N n 5 . 0 0 ug/L 4-Bromophenvl phenyl ether 34636 I 1 N n 5 . 0 0
uq/L Chlordane 39350 I _l I N Ill 0 . 0 5
uq/L 2-Chloronaphthalene 34581 I ·Mill 5 . 0 0
OHS 8351 5 {l/87)
Base;Neutrals and Acids (Continued) PAGE 3 OF 3
SYSTEM NAME & NUMBER I.T.Corp. SWATs Piif240827-04 Q1-!1arket Pla:ce MP-1 . . ~, Lab No. 890203-308
ADDITIONAL EXTRACTABLE PARAMETERS
-
REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET ANALYSES DE·rECT!ON
UNITS T CODE RESULTS LIMIT
ua;L Phenol 34694 I N1 D I [51.' 0[ 0
uq/L 2,4 6-Trichlorophenol 34621 I N D I 151. I 010
uq/L Benzidine 39120 I I N,lJ I 151. I o I o
ug/L a - BHC 39337 ~N D l l o I . I o 11
ugjL y - BHC 39340 0 1 • 10 12 I IOL.JO[l
ug/L Endosulfan I 34361 l I Nl u I I o l. I o 11
Uq/L Endosulfan II 34356 I I Nt n I I o I. I o 11
· uq/L Endrin 39390 _I I IN_ D I I o I. I o 11
Ug/L Hexachloroc~clopentadiene 34386 N1D 1210[.[0!0
ugj_L N-Nitrosodirnethylamine 34438 I N D I 151. I OJO
uq/L N-Nitrosodi2henvla.rnine 34433 _l J _l N__l D I 151. I o l o · Note any unidentified peaks below.
DHS 8351 B (3/87)
A~HICUL.TUHAL CoN~uL.TANrta
~11LMI~T::t
Al-'t-'UUIJLO WATLH LAUOHATOHY
PHONE 664-1661
AHL.A coot: 714
LAUORATORIES
f -,~I=> CHICAGO AVE.
\ .
·EDWARDS. BABCOCK 8: SONS. INC.
P.o. aox 432
RIVIi:RliiCE. CAL.IFORNIA 112::102
BASE/NEUTRALS 'AND ACIDS
ORG1..NIC ANALYSES
Date of Report: __ Mar_c_l_t_3_o_, _1_9,...89 ____ La.b Sample ID No. 890203-309 Laboratory Signature Lab · tl //1 ·
Name: E S. Babcock & Sons. Inc. Director: hc..t&'4'-C< ./ C?t..-t-n.hJ Nam& of . .Sa:mpler · T 7
Sampler: Dav~d L. Guth Employed By: I.T. Com.
Date/Ti~e Sample Date/Time Sampla --~W-e_r_e __ H_o~l~d~in_g _________ _ Yes Collected: 01-31-89 R.ec.-ived t! Lab: 2-3-89 I 0930 'Times Observed? · Were all the consti~u~nts lis_t_e~d-----
Test Methods:~---6~2~.5~/~6~08~------------ , below quantified? Yes ---•aa~-~-;-~~--------~5~••••••~~--a~a----~----••-a~----~-~------~-~------ System SWATs Pro]· ect No. 240827-04 System Name: Number:
Descr~l-p~t~i-o_n __ o_f~----------------------~-------------- ---------------- 1 i i t Q'1-Market Place Samp ng Po n : county Name: ______________ __ Name/No. ot sam-p~l-e-----------------=s~t-a~t~l-o_n ____ __ .source: MP-2 Nlllllber: I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I
Date &
Time of I I I I I I I 1.~,.1 L. J Water U· User I I I I Submitted to S\\QIS Sample: Y-Y H M 0 D T ~ ~ T Type: G/S IO: ay: --.------------ )Place an 11 X11 in bole to deljte all data..tor thia atation/datejtime. U REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET · ANALYSES DETECTIC!:
UNITS T CODE RESULTS LIMIT
Date Analyses Completed 73672 a_1g 1 o13 _~1 1 0 I I I I I Y Y M M D 0
Analyzing Agency Co~e (Lab) 28 I I I I I I
Intensive Survey Nulnber 116 .1. I I I I \
uq/L Acenaphthane 34205 .1_ N ll I I 5 I . I 0 · o
Ug/L Acenaphthylene 34200 1 N \) I 151 . I 0 I o
Ug/L Anthracene 34220 I .~ N ll I I 51 . I 0 I 0
uq/L AldrJ.n 39330 N11l I I 0 I . I 0 I 1
-Uq/L Benzo(a)anthracene 34526 I I N ll 11101.1010
uq/L Benzo(b)f1uoranthene 34230 N,D Ill 0 I .I 0 I 0
Uq/L Benzo(k)fluoranthene )4242 N ll llToT.ToTo
Uq/L ·Benzo(a)pyrene 342'17 I .I N ll . I l T 01 . I o1o Uq/L Benzo(ghi}Eervleno 34521 .l I I N ll Ill 0 I. I 0 I o Ug/L Benzyl butyl phthalata 34292 .1_ .1_ .1_ N I I) Ill 0 I . I o I 0 uq}L· B - DHC 39330 N ll I I 0 I . I 015
uq/L .~ - · BHC 34259 _N, ll I I o I. I o 15
uq/L b~s 2-chloroethvl)ether 34273 .1. .1. .l._N_, ll I 151. 1 o 1 o uq/L . bis 2-ch1oroethcixy)methane 34'278 N D I I 51 . I 0 I o UQ/L bis 2-ethv1hexy1)phtha1ate 39100 .1. .l~ • ,5 1 lsT.loTo uq/L bl.s 2-ch1oroisopropyl)ether 34203 N n I 151. I 0 I 0 - uq/L 4-Brornophenyl phenyl ether 31.636 N ll I I 5 I . I 0 I 0 ucr/L Chlordane 39350 _1_ .LN Ill I I o I.-~ oi s
uq/L 2-Ch1oronaphthalene 34501 .1. .l _llfl 11 I I 5 I . I 0 I o OHS 11351 6 (3JU7)
Base;Neutrals and Acids (Continued) PAGE 3 OF 3
SYSTEM Nl>.ME & NUMBER I.T.Corn. SWATs Pj#240827-04 Q1-!1arket Place MP-2 · · Lab No. 890203-309
ADDITIONAL EXTRACTABLE PARAMETERS
REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET ANJ..LYSES DE'rEC~~OH
UNITS T CODE RESULTS LIMIT
ua/L Phenol 3469~ I N ,D I 151. I 010
ug/L 2 4,6-Trichlorophenol 34621 _l J IN D I 151. I o i o uq/L Benzidine 39120 _l_ N _lD I 151. I o I o
Ug/L a - BHC 39337 J OJ JO 3 I ·1 o I. I o 11
ugjL y - BHC 39340 I N rD I I o l. I o 11
ugjL Endosulfan I 34361 I I N 1D I I o I. I 0·11
ugjL Endosulfan II •. 34356 N D I I o I. I o 11
ugjL Endrin 39390 I I N D I I 01. I o ll
ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 34386 I I I N 1D I2IOI.IOi0 ugjL N-Hitrosodirnethylamine 34438 _L _~N _L D I 151. I o I o ugjL H-Nitrosodiphenylamine 34433 I I I ~ ID I 151. I o l o Note any unidentified peaks below.
DHS 8351 8 (3/87)
A~HICUL.TLJHAL. CON:tUL.TANTI~
~uL.hu~r :t
At',..&;'-IVLU WAI&:H L.AUCHATOK't'
PHONE liB4·1BIII
AtU.A COOl. 714
L.AUORATOAIE:S
J21:0 CHICAGO AVE.
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS. INC.
P. o. eox 43.2.
RIVERIIIC!i:, C.AL.It'ORNIA ll2ll02
SASE/NEUTRALS 'AND ACIDS
ORGANIC ANAL"iSES
Date. of Report: __ Mar_c_h_3o_ • ..,....._l9....,8,_9 ____ La.b Sample ID No. 890203-310 Laboratory Signature Lab ./ ) · , /
Hame: E,S Babcock & Sops I Toe I , Director: J<l~u. t<-<£/1 (/{ur.z/z;c~ Nam~ of David Ll Guth .. SalDpler I I I · Sampler: ·ElDplCiyed By: I. T I Co .. I Date/Time Sample Dat~/Ti~e SalllplQ --~W-e_r_e~H~o~l~d~i~n-g _______ __ Collected: 01-31-89 R.ec.-ived ~ Lab: 2-3-89 I 0930 "1'imes observed? Yes · Were all the consticuuncg listed
Test Methods: _____ 6~2~5.{~6~08~------------: below quantified? Yes ~i:!~Jn SWATs Project No. 240827-04 ~~~=~:
Descr7l-p~t~i-o~n~o~f~----------------------~-------------- ---------------- 11 i Q1-Market Place Samp ng Po nt:~------------------~~~-------County Name: ______________ __ Namu/No. Of Sample Station
.Source: __ ~-----------~-· _-_3 __________ Number:
Dace "
. Time of I I I I I I 1· I~ l l J
SamplQ: Y.Y H MD D T ~ ~ T
Water
Type:
I I I I I I I I I I I I · I I I
Use~ I I I I Submitted to S~QIS
ID: ay: --.-------
. ( ') Place an 11 X11 in box to del51t_, All data. tor thiu .utation/dl:lte/time. U REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET · ANALYSES DETECTIC!:
UNITS T .CODE RESULTS LIMIT
Date Analyses Completed 73672 8j9 J 0 !3 11 10 I I I I I Y Y M M 0 D
Analvzinq Agency Coc=te (Lab\ 28 I I I I I I
Intt:mdve Survey Number 116 _j_ _L I I I I I
uq/L Ac~naphthene 34205 I N IJ I I 51 . I 0 · c
uq/L Acena_phthvlene .3~200 I H II I I 51 . I 0 I 0
ug/L Anthrdcene 34220 _l_ N II I T 5T. I o 1 o-
uq/L Aldr.tn 39130 L N 11 I I 0 I • I 0 I l
.uq/r;-- Benzo(a}anthracene 34526 N II ll\0).\010
ug/L Benzo(b)fluoranthene 34230 ; N II Ill o I • I o · Cl uq/L Benzo(k}fluoronthene 3~242 N II Ill 0 I I I 0 I 0
ug/L Benzo(a)pyrene 34247 _1 _L I N II .llfOT.IOIO
UCT/L Benz a (,g_hi) 12eryleno 34521 _j_ I N II Ill 0 I I I 0 I 0 uq/L Bli:nzyl butyl phthalate 34292 I I N ll Ill 0 I I I 0 I 0 UCT/LI ft - DHC 39330 N II I I 0 I I I 015
uq/L 6 -·BHC 34259 _D 3 3 I I o I. I o 15
U'J/L bi~(2-chloroethyl1ether 34273 _1 N11l I 15 I • I 0 I 0 uq/L. b_i_s_( 2-chloroethow) tneth.Ane 34278 _1 _j_ N ll I 151.1010 uq/L bis(2-ethylhe~~l)Ehthalate 39100 _j 2 1 I I 5 I I I 0 I 0 ueJ/L bi~(2-chloroisopropyl~t:ther 34203 N II I I 5 I . I 0 I 0 uq/L 4-Bromophenvl phen~; ~ther 31.636 I N I IJ I I 51 . I 0 I 0 uq/L Chlordane 39350 ~~ ll I 101.1015
ug/L 2-Chloronaphthalene 34501 tJ I I I 51 • I 0 I 0
OHS 8351 a l:l/117)
Base/Neutrals and Acids (Continued) PAGE 3 OF J,
SYSTEM NAME & NUMBER I.T.Corn. SWATs Pi#240827-04 (HJ1arket Place MP-3 · tab No. 890203-310
ADDITIONAL EXTRACTABLE PARAMETERS
REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET ANALYSES DE·rEC':ION
UNITS T CODE RESULTS LIMIT
UO/L Phenol 3469~ I ,N ,D I [5 • I 0 I 0
ug/L 2,4 1 6-Trichlorophenol 34621 I I N D I 15 • I o i o ·uq/L Benzidine 39120 J l 1:'1' ,D I \51. I o I o
ug/L a - BHC 39337 0,. p 4 I 10 . J 0 11
ug/L y - BHC 39340 I 1 ol. ,o ,4 I I o . I OJ 1
ug/L Endosulfan I 34361 J ' ~ ,D I I o . I 011
ug/L Endosulfan II 34356 I I ~\I I D I I o . I o 11
ug/L Endrin· 39390 I I ~ ,lJ I I o • I OLl
ug/L Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 34386 .N _t_D \2\ o I. I o I o ug/L N-Nitrosodimethylamine 34438 N D I L5J • J o I o
ug/L H-Ni trosodiphenylamine 34433 I I I ,N 1D I \51 . I o \ o Note any unidentified peaks below.
DHS 8351 B (3/B7)
AGHICULTURAL CCN~UL.TANTii
CHLMIST:a
rPPHOVt:C WATER LAtiOAATCHY
PHONE 664-1661
AH&::A COOt: 714 EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS. INC.
,0 LABORATORIES
\ 3215 CHICAGO AVE.
P.o. aox 432
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA &2S02
BASE/NEUTRALS 'AND ACIDS
ORGANIC ANALYSES
Date of Report: __ Mar_c_1_1 _3_o_, _1_9.,..89 ____ Lab Sample ID No. 890203-311 Laboratory Signature Lab 1 £. ; - 17
Name: E.S. Babcock & Sons. Inc. , Director: .?-.t'lu/U-:r<z./f.X-u.J'aJ'4-- Name of David L. Guth .. Salnpler 7 · Sampler: Employed By: LT. Co .. · Date/Time Sample Date/Time S~mple -~W~e-r_e_H=o~ld~i~n-g ______ _ Collected: 01-31-89 Received f} Lab: 2-3-89 I 0930 'Times Observed? Yes · Were all the constituents listed
Test Methods: 625(608 , .. below quantified? Yes
~=••aa5•~==•=~~=~=-:==a~&-•s••~~~--g~~=~=;~~=-••-a~;;;;a~-~-==-=-~~=----- ~~:;~m SWATs Project No. 240827-~4 System Number: ______________ __ Description of Q'{-Market Place
Sampling Point:~------------------~~~-------County Name: ______________ __ Name/No. Of Sample Station
Source : :!'1P-4 NUlllber:
Date "
Time ot I I I I I I I 1~1 I. I
sample: Y.Y M M 0 D T ~ ~ T
Water
Type:
I I I f I I I I I I I I I I I
User I I I I Submitted to SWQIS
ID: By: ____________ _
) Place an 11 X11 in box to deltte a.ll data.. tor this atation/da.tejtime. U REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET · ANALYSES DETECTIC!:
UNITS T CODE RESULTS LIMIT
Date Analyses CQmPleted 73672 8 I 9 IO I·J 11 I 8 I I I I I YYMMDD
Analvzinq Aqency Code (LabJ 28 _l_ _l _l_ I I I I I
Intensive survey Nuln.ber 116 I I I l l t
uq/L Acenaphthane 34205 _1. _L Ndl I 51 . I 0 · 0
uq/L Acenaphthylene 34200 ; N 1 n 151 . I o I o
uq/L Anthracene 34220 I 1 N n I 5 I • I 01-0
uq/L Aldr1.n 39330 I N .!) I 0 I . I o 11
.uq/L Benzo{alanthracene 34526 I • N ]) 1101.1010
ug/L Benzo b fluoranthene 34230 ..1. _j_ ..1. ; N ~n lT Ol • I o! o uq/L Benzo k fluoranthene J-4242 I N ll 11 o I. I o I o uq/L ·Benzo a pyrene 34247 1 I I N I) 1101.10To
Uq/L Benzo(qhi)pervleno 34521 _1 _j_ I N D 11 o I. I 0 I o uq/L Benzyl butyl phthalate 34292 I . I N I D 1101.1010 u·q;L· B - DHC 39338 _j _1 _j_ I N ll I 0 I. I 015
uq/L o -·BHC· 34259 N .1) I o I . I o I 5
uq/L bl.s 2-chloroethyl)ether 34273 _t L I N I I) I 5 I • I 0 I o ug/L. bis 2-chlor.oethoxv) methane 34278 L N D I 51 . I 0 I 0 uq/L bis 2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 39100 N D I 51 . I o I o uq/L bl.s(2-chloroisopropyl)ether 34263 _j. N n lsi.-IOIO ua/L 4-Brornophenvl phenyl ether 3~636 I 1 N n ·I 5 I • I 0 I 0 ug/L Chlordane 3Q350 I 1 N n loT.TOI5
uq/L 2-Chloronaphthalene 34581 ~'' n 151.1010
OHS 6351 e (3/67)
Base;Neutrals and Acids (Continued) PAGE 3 OF 3
SYSTEM Nl>..ME & NUMBER I.T.Coro. SWATs Pi#240827-04 Q1-!1arket Place MP-4 (-l Lab No. 890203-311
ADDITIONAL EXTRACTABLE PARAMETERS
REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET ANALYSES DE·rEC':'ION
UNITS T CODE RESULTS LIHIT
·Uq/L Phenol 3469~ I I ,N I D I 151 . I 0 L 0
u_gj_L 2 4,6-Trichlorophenol 34621 I N _j D I 151. I 0 i 0 uq/L Benzidine 39120 I I N_L D I 151. I o I o
ug/L a - BHC 39337 J ~N D I . I 0 I. I Oll
ugjL :1_ - BHC 39340 I N 1 D I I o I. I o 11
ugjL Endosulfan I 34361 I I ,N I D J I OJ. I o 11
ugjL Endosulfan II 34356 ,N I D I I o I.! o 11
u_gL_L Endrin 39390 I I IN lJ I I OJ. I 0 ll
ug/L Hexachlorocy~lopentadiene 34386 _j IN 1 D 12 I o I. I o I o ug/L N-Nitrosodirnethylarnine 3t.438 I N D I l5J. I o I o ug/L H-N i trosodiphenylamine 34433 1 I 1 1N 1 n I 151. I OLO Note any unidentified' peaks below •
. '·
DHS 8351 8 (3/87)
PHONE 6BA·IBBI
AHLA coot: 714 EDWARDS. BABCOCK & SO.NS. INC.
P.o. aox 4:12
A~tCICUL.TUHAL. CON:tUL.TANTti
CttLMI~T~
APPHOVLC \NATLH LA~OHATOHY
(",LABORATORIES
' '3:/.15 CHICAGO AVE,
RIVERIIICE. CALIFORNIA i2::102
\
BASE/NEUTRALS 'AND ACIDS
ORGANIC ANALYSES
Date of Report: __ Mar_c,_h_30_._19....,8.-9 ____ Lab Sample ID No. 890203-312 Laboratory Signature Lab 1
:J , I
Name: E.S. Babcock & Sons. Inc. Director: Lci.t-v-t..i:~~:k' / {'ft.-t.,4/vh-4.
Nama of . .sampler .. / 7
Sampler: Davl.d L. Guth EmplQyed By: I. T. Com.~
Dat~/Time Sample Dat~/Tlme SamplQ . --~W~e-r~e-=H-o~l~d'in_g _________ _ Collected: 01-31-89 Rec,dved @ Lab: 2-3-89 I 0930 "1'imes Observed? Yes · Were all the consti~uents lis~t-e~d-----
Test Methods: _____ 6~2~5~(-6~08~------------: below quantified? Yes ~~:;~m SWATs Project No. 240827-04 ~~:~:
Descr~l-p~t~i-o_n __ o_f~----------------------~-------------- ---------------- li i Q'1.Jvfarket Place
s~mp ng Po nt:~------------------~~~-------County Name: ______________ __ Nam~/No. Of Sarop~e Station
.Source: 1>.1P-5 Nwnber:
Date lil
Time of I I I I I I I I-t: I I . J
Sample: 'f. 'i M M D D T 'l' .. 1' T
Water
Type:
I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I
User 1 1 I I Submitted to S~QIS
ID: ay: ______ _
)Place An 11 Xn in box to del5tt0 all data.tor thi& &atationjdatejt'ime. U REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET · ANALYSES DETECTIC!:
UNITS T CODE RESULTS LIMIT
Date Analyses Completed 73672 819!0 1311 18 I I I I I
'i 'i M M D D
Analvzinq Aqencv Code (Lab) 28 .l. , I I I I I
Intensive Survey Number 116 I I I I i
uq/L Acenaphthene 34205 l N ll I 51 • I 0 · C
uq/L Acenaphthvlene 34200 1 R n l 51. l 010
ug/L Anthracene 34220 L N II I 51 . I 0 I 0
uq/L Aldr1n 39330 N.1D I 0 l • l 0 I 1
.uq/L Benzoc a anthracene 34526 ..1. _l _L N D 11 0 I • I 01 o uq/L Benzoc b fluora.nthene 34230 ~ N 1 n 11 o I . I o! o uq/L Benzo k fluoranthene :1~242 N ll -,1 o I. I o I o
uq/L Benzo(a)pyrene 342<17 I I N ill
0 11 0 I. I o I o
uq/L Benzo(ghi)peryleno 34521 N I il 11 o I • I o I o
uq/L Benzyl butvl phthalate 34292 I I N D 11 o I • I o I o uq/L" fi - DHC 39330 -N ll I 0 I I I 015
uq/L 6 -·BHC 34259 _0 ... 016 I o I • I 0 I 5
uq/L bis(2-chloroethyl}ether 34273 N1D I 51 I I 0 I 0
Uct/L · bis(2-chloroetho~rnethane 34278 N_ I) I 51. I o 10 uq/L bis(2-ethylhexyl}Ehthalate 39100 N ll I 51. I o I o uq/L bis(2-chloroisoprop~ljether 34:!03 J{ n I 51 I I 0 I 0 uq/L 4-~ophenyl phenyl ether 31.636 N n I 5 I • I 0 I o uq/L Chlordane 39350 N II I ol . I o I 5
uq/L 2-Chloronaphthalene 34501 I hi n I 5_1 • I 0 I 0
OHS 8351 a (J/H7)
~ ~
)
Base;Neutrals and Acids (Continued)
SYSTEM NJI.ME & NUMBER I.T.Corn. SWATs Pji/:240827-04 Q1-!1arket Place :MP-5
REPORTING
UNITS
ucrjL
uq/L
uq/L
ugLL
ug/L
uq/L
Uq/L
uq/L
ug/L
ug}L
uq/L
Lab No. 890203-312
ADDITIONAL EXTRACTABLE PARAMETERS
CONSTITUENT T STORET ANJ..LYSES
T CODE RESULTS
Phenol 3469.; I L 1N 1D
2,4 6-Trichloro~henol 34621 I N D
Benzidine 39120 I I N D
a - BHC 39337 .o ~ 2
y - BHC 39340 I I N 1D
Endosulfan I 34361 I I N tD
Endosulfan II 34356 I ,N ID
Endrin 39390 I I N D
Hexachlorocyclo~entadiene 34386 ~ I I ;N' ID
N-Nitrosodirnethylarnine 3~438 N D
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 34433 I I I ;N' I D
Note any unidentified peaks below.
DHS 8351 B (3/87)
PAGE 3 OF 3
DE'I'EC:ION
LIHIT
I 151. I 0 I 0
I 151. I o I o
I I 51. I o I o
I I o I. I o 11
IIOl.JOil
I I OJ. I o 11
I J o I.! o 11
I I 0 I. I 011
121 0 I • I 01 o
I 151. I o I o
I J5J.!Ol0
AGHicuL. TURAL. CO.NSUL. TANT6
CHt:h41ST$
APPHOV~C ~ATfR LASORATORY
PHONE 664.1661
AHEA coca:: 'a.-
r''. LA BORA TORIES
" '3215 CHICAGO AVE.
EDWARD S. BABCOCK 8: SONS. INC.
P. o. aox 432.
RIVERSIOE:, CAL.IFORNIA li2.!102
BASE/NEUTRALS 'AND ACIDS
ORGANIC ANALYSES
Date of Report: __ Mar_c_1_1 _3_o_, _1_9..,..89 ____ Lab Sample ID No.__;8;..:;.9..;.02;;;;..0~3;_-...;;.31;;;;..3;...._ ___ :;.__ Laboratory Signature Lab
Name: E S I Babcock & Sons I Inc. Director: L ~vW~-<
Name of . .~ampler
Sampler: Davld 1. Guth Employed By:
Date/Time Sample Date/Tl~e Sample -~w-e_r_e_H=o~ld~i~n-g ______ Y_e_s __ _ Collected: 01-31-89 Rec .. ived fl. Lab: 2~3-89 I 0930 'Times Observed? · Were all the constituents lis_t_e_d ____ _ Test Met.hods: ___ 6.:::.:2::.:5;;.,(,/~6~0.:;:.8 _______ · below quantified? Yes ~~:!~~m~~~ ___ T_s~Pr __ o_j_ec_t_N_o_._2_4_o_8_2_7-_o_4 ___ ~-----------~~:~:
Description of q1-Market Place --------
Sampling Point:~------------~~~----. county Name: __________ __ Name/No. Of sample Station .Source: MP-Blank. Nwnber:
Date "
Time of I I I I I I I lot: I 1. I
Sample.: Y. Y M M D D T 'J.' ! '+'
Water
Type:
I I l I l I I I I I I I I I I I
User I I I I Submitted to Sh'QIS ID: ay: ____________ _ )Place an 11 X11 in box to deljte all da.ta~tor this atationjdate/time. U REPORTING CONSTITUENT T STORET · ANALYSES DETECTIC!: UNITS T CODE RESULTS LIMIT Date Analyses Completed 73672 8J91 0131118 I I I I I
Y Y M .M D 0
Analyzing Agency Code (Lab) 28 I I I T I
Intensive Survey Number 116 I I !
ug/L Acenaphthane 34205 I N .Tl 5 • I 0 · 0
ug/L Acenaphthvlene 34200 I N &1) 5 . I 0 I o
Ug/L Anthracene 34220 _L .IN n 5 • I 0 I 0
uq/L Ald::-~n 39330 N Ill 0 • I o 11
.ug/L Benzo(a)anthracene 34526 I IN 1) 1 0 .(010
uq/L Benzo(b)fluoranthene 34230 ..1 ..1 . N I I) 1 0 . I o! o Uq/L Benzo(k)fluoranthene 34242 I N ll 1 0 . To! o uq/L · Benzo (a) pyrene 34247 I. I N I J) 1 0 • I 01 o uq/L Benzo(ghi)pervleno 34521 I I N I) 1 0 . I o I o
Uq/L Benzyl butyl phthalate 34292 _l_ _l_ I N I J) 1 0 .I o-1 o uq/LI B - DHC 39338 I _I N n 0 • I 0 I 5
ug/L 6 -~BHC 34259 NID 0 • I o I 5
U'l7L b~s 2-chloroethyliether 34273 . ' NID 15 • I o I o ug/L. bis 2-chloroetho~metbane 34278 N D 5 . I Ol 0
uq/L bis 2-ethvlhexy1)phtha.late 39100 _1 ..1 N D 5 . I o I o uq/L b~s 2-chloroisopropyl)ether 34203 ..11 N n 5 • I 0 I 0 ug/L 4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 31.636 I N n 5 • I o I o uq/L Chlordane 39350 I N I\) 0 • 1 ols
uq/L 2-Chloronaphthalene 34581 ·MIT\ 5 • I o I o
OHS 8351 e (3/8 7)
)
Base/Neutrals and Acids (Continued) PAGE 3 OF 3
SYSTEM NAME & NUMBER I.T.Corn. SWATs Pj#240827-04 Q1--!1arket Place MP-Blank
REPORTING
UNITS
UO/L
ug/L
uq/L
Ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
uq/L
Lab No. 890203-313
ADDITIONAL EXTRACTABLE PARAMETERS
CONSTITUENT T STORET A.NJ..LYSES DE'I'EC'!'ION
T CODE RESULTS LIMIT
Phenol 3469~ I 1 ,N I D I \51.! 0 I 0
2 4,6-Trichlorophenol 34621 I ,N U I J 51. I 0 1 0
Benzidine 39120 I I N D I 151. I 0 I 0
a - BHC 39337 ~N U I J o I . I o 11
y - BHC 39340 I I IN I D I I 0 I. I Oll
Endosulfan I 34361 I I IN I D I I 0 I. I o 11
Endosulfan II 34356 I N1D I I 0 I. I Oll
Endrin 39390 J _[ _[ IN D I I o I. I o 11
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 34386 I N1n I2J o I . I o I o N-Nitrosodirnethylamine 3~438 I I ,N n I 151. I o L o
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 34433 I _I i ,N _~D I \51. I o \ o Note any unidentified peaks below.
DHS 8351 B (3/87)
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED
PHONE (714} 684-1881
ESTABLISHED 1906
/"•
( ' LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
P.O. BOX 432 3215 CHICAGO AVE.
04/07/89
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: SWATs Pj#240827-04
QM-Market Place water
sample MP-1
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
Lab No. 890203-302
Invoice No. 97430
Customer No. in0292
Sul:::mitted
·By DLG
Date 02/03/89
Time 9:10
Sampled
DLG
01/31/89
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Purgeable Halocarbons and Aromatics
Parameter
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
. Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichlorqethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA Method 502. 2
Results
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropr.opene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethy 1 benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Xylenes, total
~is-1J2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Results
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
42**
NDU
ND
~-
~=None detected, detection limit:
·bate analysis completed: 02/08/89
Notes: * PQL = l.O~g/L ** PQL = 5.0~/L
0.5 ~/L NI=Not identifiable
*** PQL = 10~/L
cc:
:F.ciward s. Babcock & Sons, Inc.
/nbA~A- / f?L1~ /
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1906
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
04/07/89
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: SWATs Pj#240827-04
QM-Market Place water
sample MP-2
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
Lab No. 890203-303
Invoice No. 97430
Customer No. in0292
Sul:mitted
By DLG
Date 02/03/89
Time 9:10
Sampled
DLG
01/31/89
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Purgeable Halocarbons and Aromatics
EPA Method 502. 2 ·
Parameter
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane.
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-DichloFoethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Results
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND=None detected, detection limit:
')ate analysis completed: 02/08/89
Parameter (
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethy 1 benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Xylenes, total
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Results
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
NDU
NDU
ND
ND
NDk**
0.5 ~/L NI=Not identifiable
.. ~ces: * FQL = 1.0~/L ** PQL = 5.01-lg/L *** PQL = 101-lg/L cc:
Edward s. Babcock & Sons, Inc.
L~lcb:f:L
)
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 19oe
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
04/07/89
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: SWATsPj#240827-04
QM-Market Place water
sample MP-3
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
Lab No. 890203-304
Invoice No. 97430
Customer No. .in0292
Sut:mitted
By DLG
Date 02/03/89
Time 9:10
Sampled
DLG
01/31/89
Chain of CuStody on file: Y
Purgeable Haloca.rbons and Aromatics
Parameter
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibr6mochlorometbane
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene.-
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA Method 502. 2
Results
~/L
220
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-.1, 3-Dichloropropene
Ethy 1 benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Methyl Ethyl Keotne
Methyl Isobutyl Keotne
Xylenes, total
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Results
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
20 ND
ND
ND
10 ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
NDU
8.4**
3.8 ND
NDk**
ND=None detected, detection limit:
-'Date analysis completed: 02/08/89
.~tes: * PQL = 1.0~g/L ** PQL = 5.0~g/L
0.5 ~/L NI=Not
*** PQL = 10~g/L
identifiable
cc:
Edward s . Babcor..k !. Sons' Inc.
La~£~
))
')
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1908
PHONE (714) 684·1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
04/07/89
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: SWATs Pj#240827-04
QM-Market Place water
sample MP-4
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
Lab No. 890203-305
Invoice No. 97430
Customer No. in0292
Sutmi tted Sampled
ByDLG
Date 02/03/89
Time 9:10
DLG
01/31/89
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Purgeable Halocarbons and Aromatics
. EPA Method 502. 2
Parameter
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethe~e
Results
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND:None detected, detection limit:
Parameter (
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethy 1 benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Xylenes, total
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Results
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND**
NDU
ND ~
ND
Acetone 0.5 ~/L NI=Not i~fiable
Date analysis completed: 02/08/89
~.~6tes: * FQL = 1. Oj..ig/L ** PQL = .5. 0~/L *** PQL = 10~/L cc:
Ed:ward s. Babcock & Sons' Inc.
L~,L?'bd-/_
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF. DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 190e
PHONE (714) 684-1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE.
04/07/89
To: International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: SWATs Pj#240827-04
QM-Market Place water
sample MP-5
P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502
Lab No. 890203-306
Invoice No. 97430
Customer No. in0292
Sutmi tted Sampled
By DLG
Date 02/03/89
Time 9:10
DLG
01/31/89
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Purgeable Halocarbons and Aromatics
EPA Methcxi 502. 2
Results Results
Parameter
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND=None detected, detection limit:
.Date analysis completed: 02/08/89
Parameter
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Me thy 1 Ethy 1 Keotne
Me thy 1 Isobuty 1 Keotne
Xylenes, total
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
NDU
NDU
ND
ND
Acetone
0.5 ~/L NI:Not
NJ)k*k
identifiable
.. ~otes: * PQL = l.O~g/L ** PQL = 5.0~g/L *** PQL = 10~/L cc:
F.dJ.m.rd 's . Babcock & Sons' Inc.
·;
BACTERIOLOGY
WATER TESTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING
CALIF DHS CERTIFIED ESTABLISHED 1908
PHONE (714) 684·1881
LABORATORIES
EDWARD S. BABCOCK & SONS, INC.
3215 CHICAGO AVE. P.O. BOX 432
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
04/07/89~
To:· International Tech. Corp.
17461 Derian Avenue Suite 190
Irvine, CA 92714
Attn: David L. Guth
Sample Marked: SWATs Pj#240827-04
QM-Market Place water
sample MP-Blank
Lab No. 890203-307
Invoice No. 97430
Customer No. in0292
Subnitted
By DLG
Date 02/03/89
Time 9:10
Sampled
DLG
01/31/89
Chain of Custody on file: Y
Purgeable Halocarbons and Aromatics
Parameter
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2~Chloroethy1viny1 ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
n'ichlorcxiifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichlor~thane
1,1-Dichloroethene
EPA Methcxi 502. 2
Results
~/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Parameter
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethy 1 benzene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroeth~e
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Me thy 1 Ethy 1 Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Keotne
Xylenes, total
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
Acetone
Results
j..L.i/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND*
NDU
NDU
ND
ND
ND***.
ND=None detected, detection limit: 0.5 j..L.i/L NI=Not identifiable Date analysis completed: 02/08/89
/tes : * FQL = 1 . Of..lg/L ** PQL = 5 . OJ..!g/L *** PQL = 10f..lg/L cc:
Edward s. Babcock & Sons, roo.
L~/C4r£/
( ()C( ···~.3D/) ( -31 (/ 73 - 3'5) (- 3;() - s;'s)
Edward s. Babcock & Sons, Inc. CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD 3215 Chicago Avenue Client's Naaiti J:. I Cofl..POf1.ATto;J Riverside, CA 92507 (714) 684-1881 Lab #s: Q2t{ ~- 'Z-1 ~, 21--'J Invoice No. 93 L/ Z.:f r..:> Project No. Project Name/Location Determination Requested N C Condition of Samp 1 e I q ~LI ~I u 0 p
~'-10<6?-l- Oti MA-~1<=e:.r PL.Ac.E. SwAT l ~ r:;: m n r ~
1--::; "' ~ b t c e
~ 'IJ. I
0 ..
Samplers:
2{L{) .M
< I~ ':¥ e a s h s
(Signature) ~ :X '-' r i e i e
~
'-J
~ \.(" n a 1 r ..
~ ~ ci ~ . C'l o e 1 1 v
Sampled ~
\) )(
~
':l" -£) f r e e e I ' .tl
s Description Date Time ~ w
~ ~ ~ s d d d Remarks ( Ul ~ v w
Mf-1 '1~1s, ,/ a/ / a/
~
1 WGL-L W~Tt_,(. v v 1/ M€.'1.4l.s:; Sb As . & &
MP-z: WE.u.. lJAT"ttL I / ,/ _./ ,/ 1/ .,/ V'
1> C.d ea. . Cr .Go c... F~. r•
MP-3 Wt.t..L WA-i1..1f.. ¥"
.,., / y' , ,/ / g i.Afl MD ,J; K: ~ Nr;.
) / ./ / o/
v ,
!MP-~ ~t.JE. C.L- L}p..n_,e ,/ ,/ ,/
~ If 1 z() U-t. s~ •
\
~ / ./ ,/ ./
, J
MP-5 ~I.- LJAr£~ /
,/ / ./ g Nl1~c.::: Po~~ . <;o~.~
,)__ / I I I I I/
..,
MP- (3LAtJK t}rrowl-1u~> t) •H•LL.ft> WDrR/2.. ./ <6 A)o"l c 1 Br F' E.c. .,u , ' I
\ . &>D ID rt tll K.A.t"Jl'rl. ,
i
"'P· o, ~ .
14--~ li-~0
/\ ,
"t!,"' ttt··
. Date/T1•• R~colvod Oro~ Relinquished By: Date/Tf•• Received By: -~fi91 oCJ :?~ I
t!W. LA. it f.--
-
~
Relinquished lly:
~
~c•7 ·~·
Date/Ti•• Received By:
I
······~
Date/Ti•• yceived By:
~A·o~GtUMH7
Da 1te I Ti••
I . ;) r3 ~~(3CJ
l I
I
I
APPENDIX D
SWAT PROPOSAL
.~-'\
r···· \
(
'
~)
PROPOSAL
SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST
MARKET PLACE SANITARY LANDFILL
PROJECT 240827
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
911 Studebaker Road
Long Beach, California 90815
PREPARED BY
IT CORPORATION
17461 Derian Avenue
Irvine, California 92714
June 1988
1.0 2.0
3.0 INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY C:JR?QR,~.::-:oN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION •..••••••••••••.••••.•.••••••••••••.••..••••••••
1.1 PURPOSE OF PROPOSAL •.•.•.•.•.•••...•••.•••.••.•••••.•..
1.2 MANAGEMENT OF PROPOSAL EFFORT •••...•...••••.•.•..••.•••
1.3 APPROACH •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
1.4 SOURCES OF DATA ••................•.•.....•......•..•...
INTRODUCTORY OATA •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
2.1 NAME OF SITE •.•••••••••••••.•••••.•••••••••.••.••••••••
2.2 NAME OF OWNER AND OPERATOR •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
2.3 LOCATION OF SITE ..............••....•..•...•...••.•....
2.3.1 Street Address ....•....•.........•.....•..•.....
2.3.2 Township, Range, and Section ••••••••••••••••••••
2.3.3 County Assessor's Parcel Number ••••••••••••••.••
2.4 USAGE AND CAPACITY ......•.....••....•..........•.......
2.4.1 Classification, Types of Waste, and Usage .••••••
2.4.2 Capacity and Quantities of Waste •••.•••.••••.••• ·
2.5 EXISTING PERMITS, ENFORCEMENT ORDERS AND ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY COMPLAINTS .••.••••.•••••••••••••••.•••••••.••.
2.6 2.7
2.8 2.5.1 Permits ......................................... .
2.5.2 Existing Enforcement Orders .•••••••••••••••••••••
2.5.3 Administrative Civil Liability Complaints •••••••• CLOSURE DATA •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• . . (;LOSURE P.LAN •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND CERTIFICATION ••••••••••••••••••
2.8.1 Name and Address of Preparer •••••••••••••••••••••
2.8.2 Preparer's Qualifications ••••••••••••••••••••• :~.
2.8.3 Certification of Accuracy and Completeness •••••••
2.8.3.1 Certifier's Name and Registration Number.
2.8.3.2 Certifier's Qualifications ••••••••••••••
2.8.3.3 Statement of Certification ••••••••••••••
SITE INFORMATION .............................................. .
3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS ••••••••••••
3.2 ANCILLARY FACILITIES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••
3.2.1 Buildings ...................................... .
3.2.2 Waste Handling Areas ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.2;3 Equipment Handling Areas •••••••••••••.•.••••••••
3.2.4 Roads •••••••...••.•••••••••.•••••••..••••••.••..
3.3 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••
3.4 PRECIPITATION AND DRAINAGE CONTROL FACILITIES ••••••••••
3. 5 lINERS .••.•••.•••...•...•.......•...•..•.••..........•.
3. 6 COVERS •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
3.7 LEACHATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL SYSTEM •••••••••••••••••
3.8 LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM •••••••••••.•.••.•••••••••••••••••
3.9 SEPTAGE RECEIVING AREAS ••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••• PAGE
1-1
1-1
1-2
1-2
1-2
2-1
2-1
2-1
2-2
2-2
2-2
2-2
2-3
2-3
2-4
2-4
2-4
2-5
2-5
2-5
2-5
2-6
2-6
2-6
2-6
2-6
2-7
2-7
3-1
3-1
3-2
3-2
3-2
3-3
3-3
3-3
3-4
3-4
3-4
3-4
3-5
3-5
\
j
l
J
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY COR?ORAT:CN
4.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT MONITORING PROPOSAL ...•.•••••...•.•.•
4.1 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY •.•••..••••..
4.1.1 Geomorphology •••.•••••••.••••••••••••.••••••.•.•
4.1.1.1 Landforms ............•..•....•••.......
4.1.1.2 Drainage System .••.••••••••••••••••••••
4 . 1. 2 G eo 1 ogy ........................................ .
4.1.2.1 General Description .•••••••••••••••••••
4.1.2.2 Lithology ............................. .
Soils and Alluvium •••••••••••••••••••••
Bedrock •••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••
4.1.2.3 Structure ...................•.....•....
Soils and Alluvium •••••••••••••••••••••
Bedrock ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
4.1.3 Hydrogeology .........................•.•........
4.1.3.1 General Description ••••••••••••••••••••
Quality of Ground Water ••••••••••••••••
4.1.3.2 Climatic Factors ••••.••••••••.•••••••.•
Precipitation ••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Evaporation and Transpiration •••••••...
4.1.3.3 Surface Water and Vadose Zone ••••••••••
General Description •••••••• : •••••••••••
Stream Gaging Station and Rate of Flow •
4.1.3.4 Quality of Surface Water •••••••••••••••
Ground Water ..................•.....•.•
Springs •••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••
4.2 SCOPE OF WORK AND OBJECTIVES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••
4.3 STATEMENT OF WORK .....•.•.•............................
Phase I •••••••.•.•.••.••••••••••••••.••.•••••••••.••••• Vadose Zone •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Phase II ....•...........................•..............
4.4 DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURES ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
4.4.1 Drilling ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• : ••••••
4.4.2 Sampling ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
4.4.3 4·. 4. 4
4.4.2.1 Surface Water Samples ••••••••••••••••••
4.4.2.2 Borehole Samples •••••••••••••••.••••••••
4.4.2.3 Ground-Water Samples •••••••••••••••••••
4.4.2.4 Sample Analysis ••••••••••••••••••••••.••
Vadose Zone Soil Samples •••••••••••••••
Ground Water .........•.•••••••.•....•••
4.4.2.5 Sample Control ••••.••••••••••••••••••••
~dentification ••••.••.••••••.•••..•••••
Preparation, Packing and Shipping ••••••
Chain-of-Custody ••••••••••••••••• ~ •••••
Borehole Logging ....•....•......••••.•.•••••••••
Installation of Monitoring Wells .••••.••••••••••
SIX:0827-toc ; ;
PAGE
4-1
4-1
4-1
4-1
4-1
4-2
4-2
4-2
4-2
4-3
4-3
4-3
4-3
4-4
4-4
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-5
4-6
4-6
4-6
4-6
4-6
4-7
4-7
4-8
4-8
4-9
4-9·
4-10
4-10
4-11
4-11
4-11
4-12
4~12
4-12
4-13
4-14
4-14
4-14
4-15
4-16
4-17
)
j
;
INTERNATIONAL TECHN,OLOGY CORPOR.AT:CN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
PAGE
4.5 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN ••••.•..•...••.••••••.••• ~....... 4-18
4.6 SCHEDULE ...•••••..•.•..•..••••...•...•••••..• ~......... 4-18
4.7 REPORTING .•••••••••••••••..•.•.••••••••••.••••••••••••• 4-19
REFERENCES
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 - TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
FIGURE 2 - DETAILED TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
FIGURE 3 - AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
FIGURE 4 - CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES
. FIGURE 5 - SURFACE-WATER FLOW DIRECTION
FIGURE 6 - NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM
FIGURE 7 - REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP
FIGURE 8 - GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC SECTION
FIGURE 9 - WELL LOCATION MAP
FIGURE 10 - GROUND-WATER CONTOURS
FIGURE 11 - PHASE I PROPOSED MONITORING WELL LOCATION MAP FIGURE 12 -.SAMPLE SHIPPING INFORMATION FORM
FIGURE 13 - REQUEST FOR ANALYSIS FORM
FIGURE 14 - CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD FORM
FIGURE 15 - TYPICAL MONITORING WELL DETAILS
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
SIX:0827-toc i; i
INTERNAT10NAL TECHNOLOGY -:CR?C:<.~.::ON
SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT TEST PROPOSAL
. BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE OF PROPOSAL
The California Water Code Section 13273, as amended by Assembly Bill 3525 (Calderon, 1984), requires that a determination be made of whether the Market Place landfill (Figu.re 1), which is owned by Bixby Ranch Company (Bixby), is leaking hazardous substances that may enter the ground-water system and degrade the quality of ground water. The California Water Resources Control Board (Board) has outlined a Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT), which, when performed, will enable Bixby to make the required determination and, thereby, comply with the requirements. of the Water Code and Title 23, Chapter 3, Subchapter 15 of the California Administrative Code.
In order to assist disposal site owners and operators in planning their SWAT tests, the Board has developed a guidance document, entitled "Solid Waste Assessment Test Guidance" (Guidance). This document states that each disposal ~ite owner and/or operator shall submit to the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board a report of the SWAT procedures and results when the test is completed (SWAT Report). The Guidance document also states that, in order to avoid possibly having to repeat the SWAT, a preliminary test proposal {SWAT Proposal) should be submitted to the Regional Board in order to obtain that Board's ~oncurrence that the proposed test will, in fact, determine if the disposal site is leaking hazardous substances.
This document is the SWAT Proposal for the Solid Waste Assessment Test of the Market Place landfill. It has been prepared in strict accordance with the Guidance document.
SIX:0827-MKT 1-1
' I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY C8R?ORAT:C0f
1.2 MANAGEMENT OF PROP8SAL EFFORT
This Proposal was prepared for the Bixby Ranch Company by IT Corporation. Its preparation was under the general supervision of Ms. Judi McCaslin, Construction Manager, Bixby Ranch Company, Long Beach, California. Fer information about IT Corporation, see 2.8.
1.3 APPROACH
In order to deve 1 op sound ration a 1 e for the design and emp 1 acement of the proposed monitoring network, it was necessary first to· acquire and analyze geoscientific and technical data within one mile of the landfill (site). The fo 11 owing approach was used: ·
a) a plan was developed, which, when implemented_ and
completed, would_result in the acquisition, compilation and analysis of all available data pertinent to the
development of an understanding of the hydrogeologic
regime at the site;
b) a team of scientists and technicians was appointed by IT Corporation to gather the identified data;
c) the data were compiled and analyzed, and;
d) the proposed monitoring work program was devised.
1.4 SOURCES OF DATA
The following sources of information and data were used:
1. Agencies and departments of the City of Long Beach
• Bureau of Planning and Building Department
• Engineering Bureau
• Fire Department
• Department of Health Services
• Public Library
SIX:0827-MKT 1-2
\
I
/
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CCR?CR.~.T:CN
2. Los Angeles County agencies
• Public Works Department
Engineering Bureau
• Fire Department ·
• Department of Health Services
• Public Library
3. State agencies
4. 5.
6. 7.
8. SIX:0827-MKT
• California Department of Transportation (C~ltrans)
• Department of Water Resources
• California Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles
Region (File No. 60-89)
• South Coast Air Quality Management District
• California Division of Mines and Geology
Bixby Ranch Company
Moore and Taber Consulting Engineers
SCS Engineers
Engineering Science, Inc.
Woolsey Engineering, Inc.
1-3
/ ..
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPCRAT:CN
2.0 INTRODUCTORY DATA
The Market Place landfill (site) is located in Los Angeles County within the city of Long Beach, Ca 1 i fern i a, a 1 eng the northwestern intersection of the Pacific Coast Highway and San Gabriel River (Figure 1). The site occupies an area of approximately 13.6 acres and is situated on the floodplain of the San Gabriel River. Alamitos Bay is located approximately 1,000 feet west and the Pacific Ocean approximately 4,000 feet southwest of the site.
The landfill was in operation between mid-1960 and e·arly 1961 and accepted ·various residential and commercial wastes. During its operation, a cut and cover method of waste disposal was used.
Currently, the Market Place Office Park contains paved parking areas and various office buildings (Figures 2 and 3). The southeastern portion of the site is currently undeveloped. The property northeast of the Market Place site is also owned by Bixby and contains an oil field with operating wells.
2.1 NAME OF SITE
The site was known as the Market Place landfill. The site was also known as City Dump ·and Salvage No. 2. Los Angeles County records list the site as landfill number 42.160-375.
2.2 NAME OF OWNER AND OPERATOR
The land on which the landfill is located is owned by Bixby Ranch Company.
The site was leased from Bixby in 1960 by City Dump and Salvage, Inc., of Long Beach, California, for the purpose of disposing waste on a portion of the site. The site was operated by City Dump and Salvage as a landfill between mid 1960 and early 1961. The address and telephone numbers .of the owner and operator are:
SIX:0827-MKT 2-1
.
/ \
)
OWNER
Bixby Ranch Company
911 Studebaker Road
Long Beach, California 90815
(213) 493-1475
2.3 LOCATION OF SITE
2.3.1 Street Address
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
OPERATOR
City Dump and Salvage Inc.
No longer in business
Old address
411 Flint Avenue
Long Beach 14, California
The site is located at 6501 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California.
2.3.2 Township, Range, and Section
The site is located in a portion of the northwest one-quarter of Section 11, Township 5 South, Range 12 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian (S.B.B.M.).
2.3.3 County Assessor's Parcel Number
The Los Angeles County Tax Assessor's parcel numbers for the Market, Place Office Park property on which the landfill is located are: 7237-020, 025, 026, 031, 032, 033, 034, 035, and 036. The 1 and fill i tse 1 f is 1 ocated only within parcel numbers 7237-020-25, 026, 0~1, 032, 033, 034, 035, and 036.
SIX:0827-MKT 2-2
INTERNATIONAL "TSCHNCLOGY CCR?CR.~::-:CN
2.4 USAGE AND CAPACITY .
2.4.1 Classification,· Types of Waste, and Usage
The landfill is classified as a closed Class II sanitary landfill, pursuant t~ Subchapter 15, of Chapter 3, Title 23, California Administrative Code.
According to the Industria) Waste Disposal Permit for the site, the following types of waste were acceptable for disposal at the site:
a) non-water soluble,
inch_ ling stee 1-mi 11
products therefrom;
non-decomposable inert solids,
slag, and asbestos fiber and
b) ordinary household and commercial. refuse, including small quantities of noxious materials in mixed loads of rubbish, cold ashes received in mixed loads of rubbish, dry mud cake from oil field sumps, paint sludge
received from water circulated paint spray booths not
transported in v~cuum tanks, oil soaked excelsior or
straw used to absorb hydrocarbon oils from waste water, residue and grit from separation chambers from the
Hyperi on s 1 udge plant, paint in drums from which the major portion of liquids have been removed; and
c) garbage and market refuse.
Historic~l records indicate that approximately 30 barrels possibly containing rotary drilling mud liquids may have been disposed of at the landfill. In addition, ash residue resulting from a fire at the site, which lasted approxi mately 6 days (10-26-88 to 10-31-88), was landfilled in the southern portion of the site. From the Industrial Waste Disposal Permit, ··it is unclear whether liquids and semi-liquids were allowed to be disposed of at the landfill.
During its operation, the site accepted waste from the following clients of City Dump and Salvage, who were charged a fee to use the site: City of Long Beach, 8-Z Disposal Service, J and S Disposal Company (servicing the City of Lakewood}, the Veteran's Administration Hospital, the Los Angeles County Flood Contrril District, and the general public.
SIX:0827-MKT 2-3
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CCRPCRATrCN
1 2.4.2 Capacity and Quantiti~s of Waste
The site contains approximately 200,000 cubic yards of waste. Figures 2 and 3 show the approximate boundary of the landfill. Within this boundary, refuse was placed in a deep borrow pit located along the southeastern portion of the site and in numerous trenches located in the remainder of the landfill. The borrow pit, which extended to approximately 35 feet below grade, was excavated with the use of a dredge line. Refuse thicRness varies throughout the site, from as littl.e as on~ foot to as much as 35 feet.
Maps illustrating the thickness of trash for the entire 1 andfill are not available at this time. However, they will be included as part of the SWAT report. Based on the historical data obtained for this landfill, there are no underground storage tanks, pits, sumps etc., located within the landfill boundary. A map showing the location of existing or abandoned oil wells .on the property will be included in the SWAT report.
Residential, commercial and demolition waste comprise approximately 100 percent of the waste at the site.
2.5 EXISTING PERMITS, ENFORCEMENT ORDERS AND ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY
COMPLAINTS
2.5.1 Permits
Prior to closure, the site was operated under Industrial Waste Disposal Permit No. 2291 issue·d to City Dump and Salvage Incorporated in 1960 by Los Angeles County, Department of County Engineer, Industrial Waste Division (File No. I-. 4903). A Special Permit (No. 1430 (1)) was also issued to Bixby by the Los Angeles County Regional Planning Commission. This special permit was required in order to allow a borrow pit and waste disposal facility to operate within an M-3 (unclassified} zone. No other permits were applicable.
SIX:0827-MKT 2-4
\
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY C8RPORAT:C:--r
2.5.2 Existing Enforcement Orders
During its operation, the landfill was subject to waste discharge requirements contained in the Industrial Waste Disposal Permit (No. 2291). A separate permit was not issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
2.5.3 Administrative Civil Liabil~ty Complaints
There are no administrative civil liability complaints filed against the Bixby Ranch Company, City of Long Beach or the County of Los Angeles relating to the 1 andfill.
2.6 CLOSURE DATA
The landfill is currently closed. The Industrial Waste Disposal Permit (No. 2291) was terminated on December 15, 1960, at which time City Dump and Salvage Incorporated conttnued to operate the landfill until late December, 1960, or ) January, 1961. Final cover was placed over the landfill by May 16, 1961.
2.7 CLOSURE PLAN
. The site was closed, as directed by the Los Angeles County, Department of County Engineer by placing· varying depths of artificial fill consisting of clayey sand, sandy silt, and silty clay over the entire landfill. Depths of fill vary from 6 inches to as much as 13 feet.
SIX:0827-MKT 2-5
\
/
INTERNAT:ONAL TECHNOLOGY CCRPORAT:ON
2.8 PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND CERTIFICATION
2.8~1 Name and Address of Preparer
This propos a 1 was prepared by IT Corporation, whose address and te 1 ephcne number are:
17461 Derian Avenue, Suite 190
Irvine, California 92714
~714) 261-6441
2.8.2 Preparer•s Qualifications
IT Corporation is an environmental management company, which provides technical and operational services to industry and government. The company addresses most aspects of hazardous materials/waste management problems. Its technical groups provide engineering, geologic and hydrogeologic services, analytical services, and nuclear waste services, and its over 1000 technical employees represent many disciplines, including chemistry, geology, hydrogeology, most fields of engineering analysis and design, environmental science, and other applied sciences.
IT Corporation operates seven commercial hazardous waste landfills and treatment facilities in the State of California. These facilities were s)ted, designed, permitted, and constructed by the company.
2.8.3 Certification of Accuracy and Completeness
2.8.3.1 Certifier's Name and Registration Number
The proposal's accuracy and completeness have been certified by Fred W.
Tahse. Mr. Tahse is a geologist registered with the State of California,·, Board of Registration for Geologists and Geophysicists. His,license number is 001552, expiration date 06/30/88.
SIX:0827-MKT 2-6
rNTERNATIONAL TECH~OLOGY CCRPCRAT:CN
2.8.3.2 Certifier's Qualifications
Mr. Tahse is an employee of IT Corporation and Project Director and Manager for this SWAT program. He received a B.S. in geology in 1953 from Yale University and an M.S. in geology in 1957 from California Institute of Technology. He has over 30 years of experience in basic geologic studies, oil, gas and mineral exploration projects, and site analysis and characteriza tion programs. In the last 10 years, he has managed and participated in numerous geological, hydrogeological and geophysical programs.
2.8.3.3 Statement of Certification
I, Fred W. Tahse, certify that the data and information presented in this proposal are accurate and complete. I further certify that the conclusions and proposals herein are in accordance with accepted practices and procedures. ~ vJ ::rc4.-_
Fred W. Tahse, Geologist
License Na. 001552
SIX:0827-MKT 2-7
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CCR?CRAT:CN
3.0 SITE INFORMATION
3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS
The site is an irregularly shaped parcel approximately 1,200 feet long at its longest point and 350 feet wide at its widest point. The southern boundary of the site is the levee along the San Gabriel River, and the western boundary is Pacific Coast Highway {Figures 2 and 3).
On June 14, 1960, the County of Los Angeles Regional Planning Commission granted the Bixby Ranch Company a Special Zoning Permit {No. 1430) to establish, operate, and maintain a borrow pit, waste disposal facility, and land reclamation project on the Market Place property. This project was to prepare the land for future beneficial use. This Permit expired on December 15, 1960.
The site was leased from Bixby in 1960 by City Dump and Salvage, Inc. of Long Beach, California, for the purpose of operating a Class II waste disposal facility on a portion of the site. On September 14, 1960, City Dump and Salvage received an Industrial Waste Disposal Permit (No. 2291) from the Cou.nty of Los Angeles, Industrial Waste Division, to operate the site as a Class II Waste Disposal facility.
According to historical records, surplus excavates! material from the waste disposal site was to be used to fill in a strip of land approximately 350 feet wide between the waste disposal site and Pacific Coast Highway, which was much higher in elevation than the property. Based on the numerous borings drilled throughout the site, it appears that the majority of the property was filled in with artificial fill material.
Prese~tly, the southern portion of the site is undeveloped and consists of a vacant lot covered with numerous piles of soil, asphalt and concrete demoli tion debris. The remainder of the site is developed and contains paved SIX:0827-MKT 3-1
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY COR?ORAT:CN
parking areas, and various office buildings. The parking lot overlying the landfill contains numerous depressions resulting in a wavy, undulating surface as a result of settlement of the underlying refuse. Concrete curbs have su'nk several inches and li~ht poles have tilted out of plumb.
3.2 ANCILLARY FACILITIES
3.2.1 Buildings
A small office building was ,located on the site during the landfill 1 S operation. Currently, various commercial buildings are located on the site (see Section 3.1). However, all these buildings were constructed subsequent to the closure of the landfill.
3.2.2 Waste Handling Areas
During its operation, solid wastes were disposed of in a number of trenches of varying depths. Information on specific waste handling areas at the. site were not found in historical records.
City Dump and Salvage began disposal operations at the site, which was open to the public 7 days a week, in mid-1960 (prior to receiving its permit).
Operations are believed to have begun in the southern portion of the site and ' I
progressed to the northern boundary. The disposal permit allowed for the excavation and subsequent filling with refuse of a trench below the ground water table in the eastern one-third to one-half of the site. According to - . records obtained from the Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region, no bottom limitation to the fill was imposed.
The landfill utilized a cut and cover method of waste disposal in its daily operation. A dragline was used for excavating a deep trench (approximately 35 feet deep) along the south side of the proposed Studebake~ Road •. ·when brou~ht to the site, refuse was placed near the edge of the trench and then pushed in SIX:0827-MKT 3-2
)
rNTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ::;c;RPCR .... .T:ON
by a tractor. According to the Industrial Waste Permit for the site, refuse was to be placed in 3-foot lifts and covered with a minimum of 9-inches of soil. In addition, a daily cover of soil was to be placed over the refuse at the end of each day, and water was to be utili zed in order to compact the refuse.
The site ceased operations in early 1961 after the landfill was filled to its permitted capacity. Final cover of the landfill was in place by May 16, 1961.
3.2.3 Equipment Handling Areas
There were no specific equipment handling areas at the site. The following equipment is believed to have been used at the site: two 0-9 Caterpillar tractors; two Caterpillar and Carryalls; a road grader; a water truck; and a Northwest crane.
3.2.4 Roads
Presently, access to the site is through a number of entra~ces along the Pacific Coast Highway along the southern boundary and Westminster Boulevard along the northwestern boundary. A portion of the proposed future extension of Studebaker Road divides the undeveloped and developed portions of the landfill. During its operation, access to the site was from Pacific Coast Highway.
3.3 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES
The southern part of the site (undeveloped portion), which borders the San Gabriel River, contains an earthen levee, which is a flood control structure designed to prevent flooding along the river channel (Figure 4). While the site was active, earthen dykes and berms were constructed on the site parallel to Pacific Coast Highway to minimize drainage onto the site. These dykes and berms no longer exist.
SIX:0827-MKT 3-3
INTERNATIONAL 7ECHNOLOGY CORPCR:'-::-:CN
r \i 3.4 PRECIPITATION AND DRAINAGE CONTROL FACILITIES
Runoff of precipitation onto the northern part of the site (developed portion) is controlled by the presence of asphalt pavement and buildings, which divert the runoff into storm drains. The southern part of the site (undeveloped portion) does not contain structures that control runoff (Figure 3).
3. 5 LINERS
Liners have not been used at the landfill.
3.6 COVERS
According to historical records, refuse was to be placed in 3-foot lifts and covered with a minimum of 9-inches of soil. In addition, a daily cover of soil was to be placed over the refuse at the end of each day, and water was to be utilized in order to compact the refuse. Soil for the covers was obtained ~ from on-site sources. The cover for the landfill consists of artificial fill /
(Section. 2.7) in depths ranging from 6 inches to 13 feet throughout the site. In addition, the northerly half of the landfill is covered by an asphalt-paved parking lot.
3.7 LEACHATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL SYSTEM
There is no leachate collection and removal system at the site; however, a monitoring well (MW-24} was installed into the refuse, which extends to approximately-20 feet below the water table. A ground-water (leachate} sample was collected from this well and other borings (IT-3 and IT-4) drilled into ·the refuse. Ground-water samples were analyzed for: various metals and semi metals; EPA method 608 for priority pollutants, pesticides and aroclor; EPA • method 624 for volatile pollutants; EPA method 625 semi-vol~tile pollutants; and TDS, COO, and pH.
SIX:0827-MKT 3-4
rNTERNAT:ONAL TECHNOLOGY CCRPCR.~.::CN
,,
Results of the analyses are included in IT 1 S report entitled 11 Assessment of Bixby Ranch Company Sanitary Landfill For The Presence of Hazardous Substances11 dated July 1, 1987. During this investigation, refuse present above the water table consisting mainly of newpapers was found to be very dry with 1 itt 1 e or no decomposition detected. As a resu 1 t, 1 eachate was not detected in any of the samples collected above the water table in the vadose zone. Therefore, IT believes that a leachate sampling well would not be useful and should not be installed within the refuse. Results of this investigation will be discussed in the SWAT report.
3.8 LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM
The only leak detection system at the site consists of a passive trench-vent system near the northern landfill boundary, which was installed as a result of a gas migration investigation pe·rformed for Bixby. Eight trench vents and 7 vent pipes located in refuse prevent the accumulation of subsurface landfill gas and subsequent migration of gas toward adjacent structures. Fifteen moni toring wells were also installed to provide data for the evaluation of system effectiveness. Monitoring for all systems is performed on a quarterly basis by SCS Engineers, Inc., with results reported to the City of Long Beach. As built plans for the passive trench-vent system currently in place will be included in the SWAT report.
3.9 SEPTAGE RECEIVING AREAS
Septic tank liquid waste was not accepted at this landfill.
SIX:0827-MKT 3-5
\
)
INTERNATiONAL TSCHNOLOGY C:OR?CR.:..-:-:C::-J
4.0 SOLID WASTE ASSESSMENT MONITORING PROPOSAL
The fo 11 owing paragraphs describe the monitoring system work program that IT Corporation proposes to conduct in order to test whether the 1 andf i 11 is 1 eaki ng hazardous substances to the ground-water system. The propos a 1 wd~ prepared in accordance with the provisions and requirements of Section I I I, Paragraph A through G of the Guidance document, dated December, 1987.
4.1 REGIONAL AND SITE GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
In order to determine the paths most likely to be taken by landfill leachate and to decide the most effective sample collection locations, it is essential to have an understanding of the geology and hydrogeology of the site. The following data and discussions have been included in order to provide that understanding.
4.1.1 Geomorphology
4.1.1.1 Landforms
The topography within one mile of the landfill is generally flat with a surface elevation ranging from 5 to 10 feet above sea level. Two hills, Landing Hill and an unnamed hill, are present within one mile of the perimeter of the landfill (Figure 1). Landing Hill is located approximately 2,000 feet southeast of the 1 andfi 11 and extends to approximately 54 feet above sea level. The unnamed hill is located approximately 1.1 miles northwest of the landfill and extends to approximately 75 feet above sea level. California State University at Long Beach is located on top of the unnamed hill.
4.1.1.2 Drainage System
The landfill is situated on the floodplain of the San Gabriel River, which flows toward the south along the eastern boundary of the landfill.., discharging SIX:0827-MKT 4-1
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY COR?OR .. ~::-:C~·J
(---- ', its waters into the Pacific Ocean approximately 4,000 feet south of the landfill (Figures 5 and 6). The river channel adjacent to the landfill is unlined and approximately 300 feet wide.
/ \
' )
4 .1. 2 Geology
4.1.2.1 General Description
.-
The site is located in the Newport-Inglewood Structural Zone of hills and mesas in the segment known as the Seal Beach fault zone (Figures 7 and 8).
Erosion of this area by the ancestral San Gabriel River has formed a lowland known as the Alamitos Gap.
The area is underlain by approximately 500 feet of Quaternary alluvial sediments, which unconformaqly overlie several thousand feet of Tertiary marine sediments (Figure 8).
4.1.2.2 Lithology
Soils and Alluvium
Recent alluvium beneath the site consists of approximately 100 feet of modera tely permeable, interbedded deposits of sand, silt and clay with occasional lenses of gravel. The lower portion of this section is relatively imper meable, cons·.isting of silts and clays.
Unconformably underlying the Recent alluvium are approximately 400 feet of thin bedded sands, gravels, silts and clays. These Pleistocene sediments are underlain by approximately 1,400 feet of marine sands, silts and clays_ com prising the Upper Pica formation. The Middle and Lower Pica formations reach a thickness of approximately 1,300 feet and are composed of claystone, silt stone and sandstone, predominantly of marine origin.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-2
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY COR?CRAT:CN
The Market Place landfill site has been reclaimed from a tidal marshland by land-filling with imported sandy material and soil obtained from the borrow pit and former cut-and-cover landfill operation located at the site. Recent marsh deposits underlie the artificial fill and consist of interbedded organic-rich, fine-grained sediments (clays and silts), beach sands, a~rl fluvial sediments (sands and gravels) deposited by the ancestral San Gabriel River (HLA 1986) •. A detailed geologic cross-section, which crosses the main body of the landfill and which reflects site-specific geologic features, will be included in the SWAT report.
Bedrock
Bedrock is not exposed at or near the site. Bedrock occurs at a depth of approximately 3,200 feet and consists of several thousand feet of sedimentary rocks. These rocks belong to the Repetto formation.
4.1.2.3 Structure
~" ) Soils and Alluvium
The Recent alluvium is generally flat lying (Figure 8). The Seal Beach fault trends approximately north 45 degrees west (N45°W) and is estimated to 1 ie northeast of the site (Figure 7). Alluvial sediments of Pleistocene age have been affected by the fault activity, and their beds dip 5 to 15 degrees away· from the fault.
Sediments of the San Pedro formation and Pica formation dip 5 to 10 degrees southwest on the coastward side of the Seal Beach fault and approximately 15 degrees norttieast on the inland side of the fault. There is no surficial evidence of faulting in the Recent alluvium (U.S •. G.S. Water Supply Paper, 1109).
Bedrock
The structure of the bedrock directly beneath the site is not known. Beneath the San Gabriel River at a depth of approximately 4,500 feet, oil producing SIX:0827-MKT 4-3
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CCR?CR . .:..::c~~
(~) zones are displaced approximately 150 to 200 feet by the Seal Beach fault. At this depth, beds on the inland side of the fault dip 20 degrees northeast, while beds southwest of the fault dip gently towards the Pacific Ocean (U.S.G.S. Water Supply Paper, 1109).
4.1.3 Hydrogeology
4.1.3.1 General Description
The site 1 i es within the A 1 amitos Gap, an · area of sea-water encroachment (Figure 7). Ground water in this area is generally saline and is not suitable for drinking water purposes. Fresh water is found in the Upper Pica formation between the depths of approximately 1,200 and 2,000 feet.
Figure 9 - Hydrogeologic Section Along the San Gabriel River - which was· included in the initial SWAT proposal dated April 1, 1988, has not been included in this revised SWAT proposal because it was misleading. Based on -") the hydrogeological data used to prepare the SWAT proposal, IT believes that multiple aquifers are not present directly beneath the landfill and that all monitoring wells at this site will extend into the same aquifer or first ground water encountered.
In order to evaluate the hydrogeology more completely, IT proposes to characterize the chemistry of the ground water in each we 11 to determine if multiple aquifers are present at the site and their potential effects on the 1 andfi 11.
Regionally, ground water flows generally in a southerly direction with localized differences in the ground-water gradient resulting from daily tidal, seasonal fluctuations, or artificially induced gradient changes resulting from the extraction and injection of ground water from various water wells in the vicinity.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-4
r , Qua 1 i ty of Ground Water
I, _) Regionally, ground water is in hydraulic communication with the Pacific Ocean. ( )
It is saline and is not being used as a source of domestic water.
In April 1987, IT Corporation installed ground water monitoring wells along the southeastern portion of the site to evaluate the composition of the soil, refuse and ground water for future development purposes.
The results of these investigations will be included in the final SWAT report.
4.1.3.2 Climatic Factors
Precipitation
For the period 1966 to 1977, annual precipitation measured at the Long Beach Alamitos Land Company Station (U05508205), ranged from a low of 6.77 inches to a high of 19.46 inches. The average precipitation for those years was 11.i2 inches per year. The majority of precipitation falls dt;~ring the months of November through March (State of Ca 1 iforni a, Department of Water Resources, 1980).
Evaporation and Transpiration
Pan evaporation rates have been measured at the Rio Hondo Station (Station 5- U05-744111). For the period October, 1952, to September, 1972, the average yearly evaporation rate was 47.64 inches. The lowest monthly evaporation rate (1.92 inches) was recorded in January, while the highest evaporation rate (6.67 inches) was recorded in July.
There are no data on the transpiration rate in the vicinity of the site.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-5
iNTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ::C::<?CR:~.:-:c01
f:·) 4.1.3.3 Surface Water a,nd Vadose Zone
)
General Description
The San Gabriel River, which is influenced by oceanic tides near the site, borders the landfill on the southeast and is approximately 300 feet wide.
Surface water is always present within the channel, with the tidal influence extending approximately 1.9 miles north of the landfill. The river flows in a south to southwesterly direction discharging into the Pacific Ocean ·(Figures 5 and 6).
Stream Gaging Station and Rate of Flow
For the water year October, 1970, to September, 1980, average annual flow for the San Gabriel River at the Spring Street gaging station (Station No. F42B R), located approximately 4.2 miles northeast of the site, ranged from 27 cubic feet per second ( cfs) to 253 cfs. The average flow for this 10 year period was 78 cfs. The average volume for the period was 55,900 acre feet/year.
4.1.3.4 Quality of Surface Water
Ground Water
There are approximately 182 wells within one mile of the landfill (Figure 11).
Most of the ground water we 11 s were i nsta 11 ed as water supply we 11 s for irrigation and domestic uses. A series of 26 injection and 4 extraction wells are located along 7th Street (Figure 9). The Los Angele~ Department of Public Works operates and maintains these we 11 s as part of their A 1 amitos Barrier Project to stop the intrusion of seawater through the Alamitos Gap area. 'In addition, 2 ground-water monitoring wells were installed by IT Corporation in April, 1987, within the undeveloped portion of the landfill (southern portion) to evaluate the presence of hazardous materials beneath and adjacent to the site. Numerous active and inactive oil wells are also located north and northeast of the landfill.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-6
( )
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ·:::ORPOR.-l.7:0N
Regionally, ground water flows to the south, following the general direction of surface flow in the San Gabriel River. Figure 10 illustrates the ground water gradient beneath the western portion of the site as measured on September 2, 1986 (HLA, 1986). As shown, ground-water flow was to the south toward the ocean on this date. However, ground water may flow both in -1 northerly and southerly direction, because the landfill is within an area influenced by tidal fluctuations, and, therefore, probably varies in response .·
. to daily tidal or seasonal fluctuations.
In the Spring of 1986, ground water elevations in the vicinity of the land fill, ranged from about 1.9 feet above to 4 feet below sea level. Depth to ground water beneath the landfill is approximately 11 feet below grade, as measured in April, 1987 (IT, 1987).
Springs
There are no springs at the site.
4.2 SCOPE OF WORK AND OBJECTIVES
The scope of the proposed work program and its objectives are as follows:
1) drill four test holes in order to:
• characterize subsurface lithology;
• determine the depth to the ground-water table;
• determine the ground-water gr.adient and flow
direction.
2) following (1) and based on the findings of (1),
complete all four holes as upgradient and downgradient
monitoring wells. If necessary, drill an optimally
located fifth hole and complete as an upgradient or
downgradient monitoring well.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-7
n
INTERNATIONAL T!::CHNOLCGY CCR?c;R:o.::·:cN
3) collect and analyze ground water from final monitoring wells to determine if ground water has been
contaminated by hazardous substances. Surface water
samp 1 es wi 11 not be co 11 ected from the San Gabri e 1 River. Dilution by sea water makes it difficult to
obtain samples indicative of leakage of leachates from
the landfill.
4.3 STATEMENT OF WORK
The work program will be conducted in two phases, in order to define the ground-water gradient beneath the landfill more accurately.
Phase I
Phase I. will determine the ground-water gradient beneath and immediately adjacent to the landfill. Due to the daily tidal or seasonal fluctuations of the ground-water tab 1 e and gradient," four we 11 s will be constructed at the locations shown on Figure 11. Phase I will consist of four tasks, ~s follows:
TASK
I
II
III
IV
ACTIVITY
Drilling, sampling and logging of
four boreholes.
Sample collection and analysis
Data compilation and analysis
Preparation of Phase II work program
Boreholes MP-1 and MP-2 are located north and northeast of the 1 and fill and are intended to b~ the upgradient wells. Boreholes MP-3 and MP-4 are located south and southwest of the 1 andfi 11 and are intended to be the downgrad i ent wells. Well MW-1 (referred to as well IT-1, by error, in our SWAT proposal dated April 1, 1988) which was installed by IT in April, 1987, will also be used as a downgradient monitoring well. Well construction details for wells MW-1 and MP-1 through MP-4 will be included in the SWAT report. PVC well ·casing sections for well
through MP-4 will also be
SIX:0827-MKT
MW-1, were flush-threaded and proposed wells MP-1
flush-threaded.
4-8
INTERNATIONAL TECH.010LOGY :CRPCR.:..-:-:ON
Vadose Zone
Vadose zone monitoring devices will not be installed, because the vadose zone is thin (approximately 10 feet) and portions of the landfill are known to extend below ground water. Thus, vadose zone devices are redundant.
According to ground-water level measurements recorded by an electronic monitoring instrument over a 3-day period in 1987, ground-water fluctuations beneath the refuse along the southeastern portion of the site indicated a tide-related variation ·of about 2.5 inches from high tide to low tide (IT Report dated July 1, 1987). IT will install another electronic monitoring instrument in one of the monitoring wells to monitor the influence of tides and the resulting ground-water table fluctuations. Using this information, the transmissivity of the vadose zone will be calculated, and results will be included in the SWAT report.
A leachate sampling well will not be installed at the site because portions of the landfill are known to extend below ground water. Thus, leachate sampling wells would not be useful (see Section 3.7).
Phase II
Phase II will consist of the drilling and construction of a fifth well, in the event that this well is necessary to characterize the hydrogeology more completely. This well may be located along the northwestern portion of the landfill, depending upon the results of Phase I. If necessary, the fifth well would be installed within a time frame which would allow quarterly sampling of this we 11.
Phase II will consist of four tasks, as follows:
Task
I
II
SIX:0827-MKT 4-9
Activity
Drilling, sampling ·and logging of
fifth hole.
Sample collection and analysis
III
IV
INTERNATIONAL TECHhlOLOGY COR?CR.~l':C"-i
Compilation and analysis of all
data
Preparation of .SWAT Report
4.4 DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURES
4.4.1 Drilling
All drilling will be done with truck-mounted drilling rigs using continuous flight hollow-stem augers. All boreholes will be 10 to 12 inches in diameter.
In order to protect the integrity of the .soil and ground water samples collected during drilling, the following procedures will be used:
• All boring tools and samplers will be washed and steam cleaned initially and after the completion of each
drill hole. All drill rods, bits, stems, well casing
and well screen will be cleansed by the following
methods:
- Steam clean
- Rinse with clean, uncontaminated, unchlorinated water of a known quality and from a single source.
- Air dry and store on above-ground racks.
• The samplers will be washed with a trisodium phosphate (TSP) solution and then rinsed with de-ionized water
between sampling.
• ~11 personnel will use inert plastic gloves, which will be disposed of after use on a single hole.
• All personnel will handle tools and materials in a
coordinated manner to avoid cross-contamination.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-10
( )
INTERNATIONAL TECHNCLCGY -:::c:<?C~ . .:.:::-:c:..r
4.4.2 Sampling
4.4.2.1 Surface Water Samples
Surface water samples will not be collected from the San Gabriel River.
4.4.2.2 Borehole Samples
All borehole samples taken in unconsolidated material will be obtained by stopping drilling, then lowering a split-spoon sampler to the drilling face and collecting a sample in the split spoon sampler by hammering the sampler below the drilling face or forcing it below hydraulically. The spoon inside diameter will be 3 inches. An appropriate catcher will be used, depending on the type of material being drilled.
Samples taken at all boreholes where there is a vadose zone will be taken at approximately 5-foot intervals. A total of 2 soil samples will be analyzed from each well.
All drilled samples will be logged, and selected samples will be tested in the field for moisture content, pH, and electrical conductivity (1:1 soil to water suspension). Moisture will be determined with a Speedy Soil Moisture Tester. This method reacts the water in a sample with calcium carbide, liberating acetylene gas, in a pressure bomb. The increase in pressure is read on a gauge on the pressure bomb, calibrated in percent soil moisture content. pH ·wi 11 be determined by mixing equa 1 weights of water and rock or soil, agitating briefly then allowing the solid material to settle out of suspension. The pH of the supernatant liquid will then be measured.
Electrical conductivity will be determined on an aliquot of the supernatant liquid.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-11
rNTERNATfONAL TECHNOLOGY CCR?CRAT:C:--J
r·" 1 l 4.4.2.3 Ground-Water Samples
Ground water samples will be taken from the saturated zone during Phase II.
In order to obtain representative samples, each well (MP-1 through MP-4, and IT-1) will be purged by removing 3 to 5 well casing volumes of water before collecting a sample for analysis. The temperature, pH, and specific conductance of each well volume taken will be measured, and a sample will not be collected until these readings become-stable. The purging will be accomplished by a submersible pump powered by a portable generator.
After the well has recovered, a water sample will be collected using a Teflon® bailer.
4.4.2.4 Sample Analysis
Vadose Zone Soil Samples
Soil samples from the vadose zone will be chemically extracted (rather than pulverized) and then analyzed for the following chemicals, in accordance with the requirements of the SWAT Guidance:
SIX:0827-MKT
EPA methods 8010 and 8020
(~emi-volatile organics)
EPA wet extraction
Chloride
Phosphate
Sulfate
ICP metals: Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr,
Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Me, Ni, K, Ag, Na, Tl,
V, and Zn.
Mg and Se using AA methods.
Electrical conductivity
pH
4-12
rNTERNAl!ONAL TECHNGLOG·r c::::~PCR.~.:-:c:\1
f
( I Ground Water
( \1
IT proposes that a total of 5 ground-water samples be collected: one sample from each of the two proposed
proposed downgradient wells.
for the following:
upgradient wells and one sample from each of the
All the downgradient samples will be analyzed
EPA methods 601, 602 and 625
MEK and acetone by EPA Methods 602 and
8015.
ICP metals: Sb, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Ca, Cr
Co, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Mo, Ni, K, Ag, Na, Tl,
V and Zn.
Phosphate
Sulfate
Chloride
Nitrate
Electrical conductivity
pH
TDS
COD
Alkalinity, TOX, TOC, BOD, oil and grease
Except for field determinations of physical characteristics, all analytical determinations will be made by a laboratory certified by the California Department of Health Services.
In accordance with sound practices, trip blanks and field blanks will be run with all chemical analyses.
4.4.2.5 Sample Control
The following procedures provide for the identification, preservation, packaging, handling, shipping, and storage of samples obtained in the field, so that all samples can be readily identified and will retain, to the extent possible, their original nature.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-13
r" \
_)
[NTERNAT!ONAL TECHNOLOGY COR?C~.~.-:-:C)J
I dent ifi cation
Samples will be marked for identification at the time of collection. Marking will be on a tag or label attached to the sample container (jar, bottle, bag, etc.). Sample identification will include:
• Project name and number
• Unique sample number·
• Sampling location (e.g., boring, depth or sampling
interval, and field coordinates)
• Sample date
• Individual performing the sampling
• Preservation or conditioning employed.
Preparation, Packing and Shipping
Samples will be placed in containers compatible with the intended analysis and properly preserved. Polyethylene or glass containers usually are required, and, in most cases, samples must be cooled to about four degrees Centigrade ( 4 a C). Samp 1 es wi 11 be p 1 aced in ice chests with adequate amount of ·ice, sealed, addressed, identified, and placarded as appropriate.
As soon as field personnel have consigned samples to a commercial carrier, · they wi 11 notify the 1 aboratory by te 1 ephone of the shipment. If the samp 1 es are transported by field personnel, the_ estimated time of arrival at the laboratory will be given. Figure 12 will contain the information that will be provided to the 1 aboratory. A b 1 ank of this form wi 11 be camp 1 eted at the . laboratory during the telephone conversation.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-14
()
rNTERNATIONAL TECHN<DLOGY CORPCi<AT:CX
The final step that will be used to provide information to the laboratory is shown in Figure 13. The Request for Analysis form will be completed by the field personriel, or other appropriate project personnel, and included with the chain-of-custody record. The Request for Analysis will be provided so that analytical requirements will be defined and sample holding times will not b~ exceeded.
Chain-of-Custody
An essential. consideration in obtaining accurate chemical analyses is the ability to demonstrate that the samples were obtained from the locations stated and that they reached the laboratory without alteration. Evidence of collection, shipment, laboratory receipt, and laboratory custody until dis posal must be documented to accomplish this •. Procedures will be used that accomplish this documentation through a chain-of-custody form that records each sample and the individuals responsible for sample collection, shipme~t, and receipt. Figure 14 shows the chain-of-custody form that will be used in the collection and shipping of samples.
The following procedures will be followed for all samples subject to chemical analysis:
• Sample containers will be sealed in the field. Any
samples that do not arrive at the laboratory with
seals intact will not be considered to have been in
valid custody.·
• A chain-of-custody record will be initiated in the
field for every sample. - A copy of this record wi 11
~ccompany its sample. ·
• Each time responsibility for custody of the sample
changes, the new custodian will sign the record and
denote the date. All custody changes of samples
will be a person-to-person exchange of custody
documents and samples.
• Upon sample destruction or disposal, the custodian
responsible for the disposal will complete the
chain-of-custody record, fi 1 e a copy, and send a
copy to the Project Manager or to his designated
representative for recordkeeping.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-15
INTERNAT:ONAL 7:::CHNOLOGY ::::::l<PC:-<..~.7:::::-i
• The custody of individual sample containers will be
documented by indicating appropriate chain-of
custody information on each sample tag or label for
all chemical analysis samples.
• The following documentation will supplement the
chain-of-custody records:
- Field log book ultimately to be filed in the
project files
- Sample label on each sample
- Sample seal on each sample
- Field collection report
- Photographic records (wherever practical and to
the extent economically feasible).
• Prior to sampling, all personnel involved will have
received copies of the chain-of-custody procedure
and will be instructed in its use.
Multipart chain-of-custody forms will be used so that a copy can be returned to the individual shipping the samples after they are received at the r ') 1 aboratory and after they are disposed of.
4.4.3 Borehole Logging
An IT geologist will supervise the operations of the drilling rig and perform sample collection and logging of soil samples. The logging information recorded in the field will include:
• Headspace analysis. Selected soil samples will be
checked in the field for presence of volatile organics
using a volatile organic analyz,er, such as an HNu-model photoionization detector.
• Heading information, including project number, boring number, person responsible for logging the hole, ground elevation and coordinates, and date started and
completed.
• Depth, recorded in feet and tenths of feet.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-16
I,-- ·~
I
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY COR?O:<:~:r:CN
Detailed SQil descriptions, including:
major soil component
- secondary components and estimated percentages
- Unified Soil Classification symbol
- color
consistency or density
-moisture content- listed as an adjective (e.g., dry,
moist, wet)
- texture
- depositional ~rigin.
-·
• Depth/elevation interval
• Depth/elevation of lithologic changes
• Water-table information and method of determination
• Sample drive and recovery
• Equipment details
• Drilling sequence and comments
• Problems encountered
4.4.4 Installation of Monitoring Wells
Upon camp 1 et ion of Phase I, monitoring we 11 s wi 11 be camp 1 eted according to the industry standards for monitoring wells for hazardous waste .sites. The well design that will be used is shown in Figure 15. The wells will be con structed of 4-inch nominal diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well screen (0.010-inch slots) and flush-threaded PVC riser pipe. The screened interval will be 15 feet long, with 10 feet of this length below and 5 feet above the ambient static water level. Based on hydrogeological information used to prepare the SWAT propos a 1, . we be 1 i eve that the screen 1 ength, 10 feet be 1 ow and 5 feet apove the ambient static water level, is sufficient to allow for expected tidal and/or seasonal fluctuations in the water table. According to . ground-water level measurements recorded by an electronic monitoring instru- ment over a 3-day period in 1987, ground water fluctuations beneath the refuse along the southeastern portion of the site, indicated a tide-related variation of about 2.5 inches from high tide to low tide {IT Report dated J~ly 1, 1987).
SIX:0827-MKT 4-17
iNTERNAT:ONAL ~:::c::::NOLCGY CCRPCR . .:..:-:c~
r-,,
( 1 The annular space of the screened interval and 2 to 3 feet above it will be packed with #2 silica sand. A 1 to 2-foot bentonite pellet plug will be emplaced above the sand pack. From t~e upper bentonite seal to the surface, the annular space will be grouted with Volclay grout. A one-inch PVC tremie pipe will be used to place all material into the annular space.
Each well will be completed either in a concrete vault with a locking steel traffic cover or a steel stand pipe equipped with a locking cap.
A sketch of each monitoring well, showing depth of well, bottom of the boring, screen length and depth interval, coupling location, gravel pack, bentonite seal, grout, cave-ins, location of bedrock, and location of ground surface, will be maintained in the project files, along with the original boring 1 ogs. The sketch a 1 so wi 11 inc 1 ude the actua T composition of the grout, seals, and gravel pack.
4.5 HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
See Appendix A.
4.6 SCHEDULE
Drilling, installation, development and sampling of the proposed monitoring wells and analysis of samples will be done according to the following schedule:
ACTIVITY
-1. Water Quality Control Board reviews and
approves monitoring well work program
2. Begin monitoring well work program; collect
soil samples.
3. Complete monitoring well construction and
collect first water sample
SIX:0827-MKT 4-18
DATE
06/01/88
07/15/88
08/01/88
INTERNATrONAL TECHNOLOGY C:.J~PCR . .:..-:-:c:-;
4. Submit draft SWAT Report to Bixby
5. Collect second water sample
6. Collect third water sample
7. Collect fourth water sample to complete
quarterly sampling program
8. Submit final SWAT Report to RWQCB
4.7 REPORTING
09/15/88
11/01/88
02/01/89
05/0l/89
7/0l/89
Following the completion of Phase II, a final report will be submitted to the Water Quality Control Board. This report will include the following:
• Well construction diagrams;
• Boring logs of all drill holes;
• .List of soil· samples taken and tabulation of field
parameters measured:
- Physical description
- Moisture content
- Electrical conductance
pH
• List of water samples taken and tabulation of field
parameters measured:
- Specific conductance
- pH
- temperature
• All analytical results
• Description of hydrogeology
• Site characteristics
• Waste characteristics
• Air quality solid waste assessment test
~ Solid waste assessment test summary
• Preliminary conclusion.
SIX:0827-MKT 4-19
INTERNATIONAL TECHN,QLOGY CCRPCl<AT:CN
C\ \ )
REFERENCES
INTERNATIONAL TE:CHNOLOGY CCRPCRAT:C~
REFERENCES
Engineering Science, Inc., 1976, Report of Gas Migration Investigation, The Market Place, Long Beach, California, Job No. 2134.
Harding Lawson Associates, 1986, Hydrogeologic Investigation Exxon Servic.:
Station 7-3047, Long Beach, California, Job No. 4167, 138.11.
IT Corporation, -1987, Report, Assessment of the Bixby Ranch Company Sanitary Landfill for the Presence of Hazardous Substances, Job No. 240402.
Los Angeles Department of Public Works, 1985-1986, Alamitos Barrier Project, 22nd Annual Report.
Moore and Taber Consulting Engineers, and Geologists, 1986, Interim Foundation Investigation Report, Proposed Office and Restaurant Buildings, Market Place Office Park Phase II, Long Beach, California, Job No. 186-63.
Moore and Taber Consulting Engineers and Geologists, 1987, Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Studebaker Road Extension, Long Beach, California, Job No. 187-73.
Moore and Taber Consulting Engineers and Geologists, 1986, Interim Foundation Investigation Report Proposed Market Place Movie Theater, Long Beach, California, Job No. 186-73.
U.S. Geological Survey, 1956, Ground-Water Geology of the Coastal Zone, Long Beach-Santa Ana Area, California, Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1109.
U.S. Geological Survey, 1959, Hydrology of the Long Beach-Santa Ana Area, California, Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1471.
SIX:0827-R1ref R-1
rNTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY ~CRPC:<.-l.7:C:'-I
FIGURES
~\ )
./
(
<!
I
1'-
(\J
:a)
0 <;;!".
(\J
j
I
LONG
+
C\
SITE~
SCALE
0 2000 4000 FEET
REFERENCE:
USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF
LONG BEACH, LOS ALAMITOS AND S,EAL BEACH,
FIGURE
TOPOSRAPH IC MAP 0 F
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOP
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
+ \
CALIFORNIA QUADRANGLE; DATE: 1964, 1964 AND r't"""J
g: 1965 RESPECTIVELY; PHOTOREVISED: 1981; SCALE 1:24000 l.!..J . Creating a Safer Tomorrow ~" L--~---------------------' "
!\J .• ~ •• ! ·~ ~.. . ! •• ••
~ >
!DID
cc wu...
~ > uG
wCI
I a. ua.. <t
., s
.
I .•. :·-.' l I ~
t,~a~;~~,.. .-?"'·.:t.....-: ~--~:~;o;..:·
+
LEGEND -
-5-- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR
SCALE
r------,
0 600
REFERENCE:
1200 FEET
.. '
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERIN.G, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
.,/)_"'
.. ·
.. ·
FIGURE 2
DETAILED TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF
MARKET. PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH 1 CALl FORNIA
+
[D ... Creating a Sa1er Tomorrow
-~,
) REFERENCE
LLOYD DEMERS AIR VIEW, INC.
DATE OF PHOTOGRAPH :JANUARY 1987
FIGURE 3
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
MARKET PLACE SITE
PREPARE[) F()R
BIXBY .RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
[D
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
"" <!
I
t'-
N
( co
0 oq-
N
~a:
\ ) ,_
)
I
NOfE
+·:
LEGEND:
SURFACE-WATER
FLOW DIRECT I ON
/5...-- TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR
SCALE r __ ____,_
0 600
REFERENCE:
1200 FEET
_ .. ,_
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
Do Not Scale Th1s Draw1ng
. .
, .... :-... ..: ·- - ~---\·-'~"~ ....
-... -~"':, ;...T.: ~ • ,.,~~ .·'
FIGURE 4
CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALl FORNIA
·? ..
+
. .. Creating a Sater Tomorrow
(
'\
\.0
<r
I
r-
N
co
0 <:t
N
>- >IDID
oo ww :.: > uO wa:
j
··-..
I :t ~"' u .c{ 'VC"-s.
• s 54.
-~OTE
+
LEGEND:
SURFACE- WATER
FLOW DIRECTION
5_.......... TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR __..........
SCALE
r-- _____,
0 600 1200 FEET
REFERENCE:
,, ..
.. '
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
Do No! Scale Th1S Draw1ng
'·
,.,
+. •> ,.
~· ,,•
. --------·
+
FIGURE 5
SURFACE -WATER FLOW DIRECTION
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH1 CALIFORNIA
. .. Creating a Sater Tomorrow
(
/
(
<I:'
<(
I
I'-
(\J
())
0 <j"
(\J
. \
"-
...
> -
-
j
,---.
\i.-
I
'LONG
+
C\
SITE~
SCALE
0 2000 4000 FEET
LEGEND
--...... SURFACE WATER FLOW
REFERENCE:
USGS 7.5 MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF
LONG BEACH, LOS ~LAMITOS AND SEAL BEACH,
CALIFORNIA QUADRANGLE; DATE: 1964, 1964 AND
FIGURE 6
NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM
MARKET PLACE L:ANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
1965 RESPECTIVELY; PHOTOREVISED= 1981; SCALE 1=24000 "' "' "~ "' L._ _______________________ _____. . Creating a Safer Tomorrow '"\, , ..... '':
...... J
c.J:
(
\
•-'
0 "!"
N
Z=-
·:
·: .:
:::: -~ ~
- ~
.... ~
:: c.. c <
j
~
I
+
LEGEND:
Qol
Qpu
~ Jd ,_; -.: t'Y-·
\K"FQx;
0 ALt.UVIAL AND COASTAL
DEPOSITS
TERRACE COVER
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
THE SEAL BEACH FAULT
SCALE
2000
SEE FIGuRE 9 FOR CROSS-SECTiON
REFERENCE :
USGS WATER- $UP PLY PAPER 1109 PLATE 3.
FOR TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE SEE FIGURE I.
Do No! Scale Th1s Oraw,ng ·
i ,.
·' ~.
4000 FEET
1 -~··
FIGURE 7
REGIONAL GEOLOGIC MAP CF
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
·~ ...
... Creating a Sater Tomorrow
r I
\
>->-CilCil
oo wUJ
x:> uO wa:
I a.. ua.. <
~
:::> 1-
C!
ui
(.!)
U1
:::>
1-
UJ
w
lJ..
~
z
0 1-
<t
> w
....J
w
,,
A
SOUTHWEST
APPROXIMATE
PROJECTION OF
LANDFILL
AI
NORTHEAST
-100
-200
-300
-400
§:J
r::l L.....:....J
----=----=-- a o
o, 0: o. 0
" 0 0 00 0 : ~ . ~
o RECENT ALLUVIAL DEPOSITS -- · o
-=--
--
---
0 0 . 0
... 0
. 0.
--- ------- ~- Cc -. 6'·.o~-.:::;::_ o. o .. o.;_ , . o · 0 -- -?- -------?-
• 0 ... - - -100
~· o. 0 o··. · ? ---?--:----- - -:-o 0 ---= --- • . . ---.. do__...,......----.·~--··- _;:::::::- c -::::-- -- . . " . . ". 0 . ,
- ..--- ···attJo _a~
.-----; " • .() ()" o oc::nOSIIS - •· .o.
• I!J • • NG ~r o .. e>
o :,..c::o- gt:.P..R\ o .. o. o_ o .... ,., p.. I ~" o . . . 0 • 0 . . . . o· .- ~· o o 0 o .., o · 0 · o .
' 0 - -0· .• •. 0
oe" -oo" n- ••
---? ~ -_;....r- -........._? --• ---- - • .:...--~ .!.--........._, d () ---- 0 ~ • 0
------ -. ------------
-- 0 0 (/
----
0 -___:::. " 0 ·. "0 ()
HORIZONTAL SCALE
1/2
VERTICAL SCALE
--.. --.:.- . o·· o
p.............. -..........--
{£ts,o~ --..- --
.·""":'-£NeD ~ """'-.... . . £Po ......_-........... ~ ...__. s; 1s a "'......_ --:--.._ ...............
<> "' . "'"'-..... "':""- -200
--.............. .,., ......... ~ ~' ...........__ -...... ................ . "'.,. 0 ...__ "':--...__ '--............ -...........
-300
-400
I MIL.E
LEG~="ND 0 100 200 FEET
.SILT AND CLAY
SAND
GRAVEL FIGURE 8
GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC SECTION
MARKET PLACE :....ANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORN:A
REFERENCE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA-DEPARTMENT OF
WATER RESOURES, STUDY OF ALAMITOS
GAP JUNE II 1956. rn ... Creating a Sater Tomorro..,
00 No! Sc:ale Th1S Oraw1nq
~
<!
I
1'-
r
(\j
I co
\ 0
<::t
(\j
~ .
~ .::.. ~
......
::.:: >
'-.... c:
I
~
(__
<
(
j
.....,
--
~·.-::
r=:-hJ .)
·"'" :-K; 0'
·LONG
+
~ SCALE
SITE~ 0 2000 40CO FEET
NOTE
Lt;GEND
0 WATER WELL
INJECTION WELL
EXTRACTION WELL
D AND t:. SYMBOL..ED WELLS ARE PART OF THE
ALA'V11T0~ S:::A WAf:::k 'NfFi·J~.r'i~ ~;.~r\i-il=:i-\ PR0 li::'..;T FOR TOPOGRAPHIC REFERENCE SEE F:G'JRE I.
I
.: .,____.:_~~
"---'--- I • I
r!
.•• lf:=?.:
I •. ·-.
I O··--
~-- .·'
~
·L::
FIGURE 9
WELL LOCATION MAP
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
BIXBY RA.NCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA
-----
Creating a Safer Tomorrow
c.
<t
I
f'--
N
( co
\ 0
""" N
~a:
(
HS ·. '\
NOTE
'• .:·· '• .... _.._ ~~ .. ···::: -·
L-._ If '•,
LEGEND
MP-4$
IT-IS
..... 1.0--
PROPOSED WELL LOCATION
EXISTING MONITORING WELL
GROUND WATER CONTOUR
(APPROXIMATE ELEVATION)
--5-- SURFACE CONTOUR
SCALE
r -0 600 1200 FEET
REFERENCE:
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
·oo Nol Scale Thrs Drawrng
FIGURE I 0
APPRO X IMA-:-E
GROUND WATER CONTOURS
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH, CALl FORNIA
rn ... Creating a Sater Tomorrow
~
<!
I
t"
N
co
0 <::t
N
24. 26
.. '
LEGEND
MP-4$ PROPOSED WELL LOCATION
MW-1 S . EXISTING MONITORING WELL
SCALE
r - ---,
0 600 1200 FEET
REFERENCE:
BASE MAP- CITY OF LONG BEACH, DEPARTMENT
OF ENGINEERING, 1978 THROUGH 1982.
··oo Not Scale Th1s Draw1ng·
'·
FIGU~E II
PHASE I
PROPOSED MONITOR1NG W':.l __
LOCATIOtJ M.L.F"
MARKET PLACE :__AN:lF 1 _L
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH 1 CALl FORNIA
+
. .. Creating a Safer Tomorrow
IT CORPORATION
FIGURE 12
SAMPLE SHIPPING INFORMATION
SHIPMENT INFORMATION
(Field to Lab by Telephone)
Date of Shipment: ----------------------
Laboratory Destination=-------------------------------------------------- Laboratory Project Contract=------------------------~------------------ (Name) (Telephone Number)
Number Containers Shipped: __________ __
Mode of Shipment: ____________________ ___
Shipment Number(s) =--------------------
Time of Shipment: ____________________ __
Date/Time of Shipping Information Transmitted to Lab; ______________ __ Individual Contacting Lab; ____________________________________________ ___ Individual in Lab Receiving Information: ______________________________ _ NOTE: PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION TO RECEIVING
LABORATORY AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER
SAMPLES ARE SHIPPED.
rn
WTERNATIONAL
. ECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
PROJECT MANAGER
BILL TO
PURCHASE ORDER NO.
Sample No. Sample Type
..
Sample Volume
"
F, "fiE 13
REQUESTFOR ANALYSIS
DATE SAMPLES SHIPPED
LAB DESTINATION
LABORATORY CONTACT
SEND LAB REPORT TO
DATE REPORT REQUIRED
PROJECT CONTACT
PROJECT CONTACT PHONE NO.
Preservative Requested Testing Program
TURNAROUND TIME REQUIRED: (Rush must be approved by the Project Manager.) Normal ___ ~ Ruah ___ _ (Subject to rush surcharge)
'~
A/A Control No .
C/C Control No. ______ _
Special Instructions
POSSIBLE HAZARD IDENTIFICATION: (Please indicate if sample(s) are hazardous materials and/or suspected to contain high levels of hazardous substances) Nonhazard __ _ Flammable __ _ Skin Irritant __ _ Highly Toxic __ _ SAMPLE DISPOSAL: (Please indicate disposition of sample following analysis. lab will charge for packing, shipping, and disposal.) Return to Client __ _ Olapoaal by Lab __ _
FOR LAB USE ONLY
Received By----------------
WHITE- Original, to accompany samples
YELLOW- Field copy
Date/Time ________ _
Other _______ _
(Pte ... Specify)
/~
rn . ..:NTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
FIGURE 14
CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD
A/A Control No. ______ _
C/C Control No. A 7 9131
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER LAB DESTINATION
SAMPLETEAMMEMBERS ____________________________ ___ CARRIER/WAYBILL NO. ------------------------- Sample Sample Date and Time Sample Container Condition on Receipt Disposal Number Location and Description Collected Type Type (Name and Date) Record No -·
-·-
-·
Special Instructions: ------...,.-------------------------------------------- Possible Sample Hazards:-------------------------------------------------- SIGNATURES: (Name, Company, Date and Time)
1. Relinquishe:.d By:--------------------
Received By: ______________________ _
2. Relinquished By:--------------------
Received By:
WHITE - To accompany samples
YELLOW- Field copy
3. Relinquished By:--------------------
Received by:----------------------
4. Relinquished By:-------------------
Received By: ____________________ _
<l:
I
1'-C\J
co 0
<::t
C\J
(Ja:
~w
~CD =CD
<{::2
a:::J oz
-C\J
w
_j
(IJ
<:(
>->-coco
oo ww :.::> uO wa:
I a. ua.. <{
"' ~ '< 19841T CORPORATION
"' ALL COPYRIGHTS RESERVED
··oo Not Scale Th1S Draw,ng·
J:
f-0.
w
Cl
NOT TO SCALE
LOCKING WELL COVER
WELL PAD
GROUND SURFACE
CONCRETE CAP SEAL
4" DIAMETER PVC BLANK
. WELL CASING
VOLCLAY GROUT
BENTONITE SEAL
1/4" BENTONITE PELLETS
FIGURE 15
TYPICAL MONITORING WELL DETAILS
PREPARED FOR
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
LONG BEACH1 CALIFORNIA
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
[NTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CCRPOR .. ~:::c:---J
APPENDIX A
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORAT:ON
APPENDIX A
HEALTH AND SAFETY PLAN
1.0 INTRODUCTION
It is the policy" of IT Corporation to ensure that all of our geotechnical activities are conducted in a manner that is both safe and healthful. Since it is apparent that ·certain accident and injury risks are unavoidably associated with the proposed soils drilling and sampling work at the Site, efforts will be made to identify, evaluate, and control all potential health and safety hazards that may be encountered by our Site personnel. In order to account for these Site specific control measures, a health and safety plan has been de vi sed for the proposed project work, the contents of which are categorically described in the following discussion.
2.0 HAZARDOUS IDENTIFICATION
2.1 CHEMICAL HAZARDOUS
Since all of the planned geotechnical activities will be conducted in non contaminated areas around the per' phery of the Site, any chemica 1 contamination, if encountered at all, will be found within the soil and ground water as dilute components of landfill leachate which has infiltrated the underlying soil in the work area. Although it is possible that some of these leachate constituents may, in fact, consist of hazardous chemicals, the leachate mixture itself is likely to be water soluble, stable, and present in conservative nature of our planned drilling and sa~pling work in conjunction with these chemical/physical charac.teristics substantially reduces the possibility that significant chemical exposures will be experienced by our; Site personnel. Under these conditions, chemical exposure hazards are almost exclusivelY, confined to direct skin contact with the contaminated soil and ground water, a condition which can be controlled through the judicious use of the personal protective controls discussed below.
SIX:0827-AppA A-1
(
\
INTERNATIONAL TECHI'fOLOGY CORPORATION
Hydrogen sulfide and methane gas are typically found within municipal land fills as products of anaerobic bacterial digestion, and subterranean pockets of these gases may be encountered during the construction of the monitoring wells. If allowed to accumulate at high concentrations in confined spaces, methane gas can form an explosive mixture with air. Hydrogen sulfide, on the other hand, presents a severe respiratory hazard when inhaled at high concen trations. Periodic air sampling of the jobsite will be conducted with a combustible gas indica~or and hydrogen sulfide detector to verify these safe ambient air levels.
2.2 PHYSICAL HAZARDS
In addition to the aforementioned chemical hazards, physical hazards, which are normally associated with drilling equipment, can be expected to exist at the jobs1te. Proper and customary precautions will .be taken to guard against these hazards.
/ \
\ ) 2.3 HAZARD SURVEY
In an effort to identify other hazards that may be present at the jobsite, our site supervisor wi 11 conduct a health and safety survey of the work area before the start of each shift. The results of this evaluation will be communicated to our work crews through a 11 t.ailgate safety 11 meeting in which all assembled employees are formerlly presented with the survey findings and are, in turn, encouraged to contribute. their own observations on hazards present and appropriate work controls. A tailgate safety form will be used to document these sessions.
3.0 HAZARD EVALUATION AND CONTROLS
'The ambient air within the jobsite will be periodically tested with a combustible gas indicator in order to assess the. fire and explosion hazard posed by the methane gas. Measured combustible gas concentrations that exceed 10% of the instrument's calibrated lower explosive limit will result in the SIX:0827-AppA A-2
)
)
/
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORAT:CN
suspension of all work activities until the gas levels can be safely reduced.
Hydrogen sulfide gas concentrations will also be measured periodically with a direct reading Draeger Tube air sampling kit. If hydrogen sulfide levels in excess of 10 ppm are detected, then mechanically induced dilution ventilation or air-supplied respiratory equipment will be used to eliminate harmful inhalation exposure.
4.0 PERSONAL PROTECTIVE CONTROLS
In conjunction with the environmental control discussed above, personal protective equipment will be used by our personnel during certain phases of the work. The selection of appropriate protective equipment will be based on the type and degree of exposure hazard present and the nature of work activity assigned to our Site personnel. In general, the following protective clothing will be worn by all Site personnel who must handle or contact contaminated soil or water in the course of their work:
• Polyethylene coated Tyvek coveralls
• Hard hat and safety glasses
• PVC boots and gloves
Since it will not be possible to attenuate the high noise output of the drilling equipment, all crewman working around the drill rig will be required to wear hearing protection. And, also, if it is apparent that a nuisance airborne dust hazard is a problem in work area, djsposable paper dust respirators (3M #8710 brand) .will be worn.
The selection of appropriate protective equipment will be made by IT Corporation's resident industrial hygienist. And all personnel who must wear this equipment will be instructed in its proper use.
SIX:0827-AppA A-3
~\
I )
)
INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORAT:ON
5.0 CONCLUSION
The hazard evaluation and control strategies discussed in this plan are intended to control the accident and injury risks associated with this drilling project in order to ensure that all work can be conducted in a .safe and he a lthfu 1 manner. IT Corporation will make ava i1 ab 1 e its he a 1 th and safety staff to support our geotechnical act~~ities at the Site and institute other control measures that may become appropriate as work progresses.
SIX:0827-AppA A-4
)
APPENDIX E
BORING LOGS
Cla:: Zw
§:CD
<::::< a::::> oz
>>-CD
CDO
0~
~0 ua:: wo...
IO...
u<
WELL SUMMARY
:::. --... -- .. . .... . .. . ... -- .. . .... -- .... ... . .. .... -- .... ... . .. .... -- .... ... -- .. . .... . .. . ... -- .. . .... . .. . ... -- .. . ·::.· -- ·::: ····--····
.... --
.... --···· ... . .. .... --····
:::. -- ::: . ... -- ... ... -- .. . .... . .. . ... -- .. . ············ ·············
DO HOT SCI.L.E 1HJS DRA'MNC
SYMBOL
I
[:]
u
D
DESCRIPTION
CEMENT-BENTONITE GROUT
PELLET BENTONITE
FILTER SAND
BLANK CASING
SCREENED CASING
SLOUGH
WELL SUMMARY LEGEND
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
C\1 uses CLASSIFICATION PES
aJ RING/ I
I I
:.LBY PITCHER <{ CLEAR SIEVE PLASTIC SACK JAR THIN
- OPENINGS USJE SAMPLER BAG WALLED
10 10
I I I I I~ ~
TUBE
!'(')
aJ "5' II~" 3/4" 318'"
<::lc:::
.4
~UJ 1000 100 10
:s:co 1111 I I I l I IIIII I I I I 1!11 I
I~ ~
<1:~
a:::J
~~
COBBLES I
GRAVEL
k B EJ 0 0
COARSE I FINE
uses
-I-
uses CLASSIFICATION OF STEM (USCSHASTM 02487-85)
1-1-
50 GROUP NAME
>->-coco 40
.<ell-graded gravel
oo ~
•e ll-graded grave 1 w1th sand
UJUJ >-0 IPoorly graded gravel ~>
~~ uo I- ~ !Poorly graded gravel with sand
UJC::: c::;a: 30 "'/ Silty gravel Io.. ~-;/
uo.. I- ~ Silty gravel with sand
<1: (f) X ,/ J :v rlayey gravel -I- <tw
_Jo 20 () ·- layey grave 1 w1tb sand
,1'- o..z // 0~
c:cl~ - v ~Well-graded sand
·o / a:r<> /
C. V :well-graded sand w1th gravel
·I": 10 <((j) / v Poorly graded sand
~-
7 CL-ML I
Poorly graded sand with gravel
4 II
MLor OLSilty sand ,
z 0 Slltv sand with •ravel
3:>- 0 10 20 30 40 Clayey sand
<teo Clavev sand with aravel
a: LIQUID Silt • Silt with sand or yravel 0 Sand.v silt • Sandy silt with gravel ~ Gravelly silt • Gravelly silt with sand
Lean clay • Lean clay with sand or gravel
Sandy lean clay • Sandy lean clay w1th gravel
CQN Sl STEN Gravelly lean clay • Gravelly lean clay with sand Organic silts or organic clays of
, low 'plasticity
CONSISTENCY
:Elastic silt • Elastic silt with sand or gravel
FIELD 'Sandy elastic silt • Sandy elastic silt with oravel ,Gravelly elastic silt • Gravelly elastic silt with sand VERY SOFT EASILY f'ENFat clay • Fat clay with sand or ~ravel INCHES B~ Sandy fat clay • Sandy fat clay w th gravel
iGravellv fat clav • Gravelly fat clay with sand
SOFT EASILY PEtOrganlc clays or organic silts of
INCHES aimedlum to high plasticity
I
~Peat, muck and other highly organic
MEDIUM STIFF ~~Nf~~T~ soils
PRESSURE
READILY INC
S Tl F F PENETRATE
VERY STIFF READILY IN
HARD INDENTED W
I
'
I
DENSITY ICE THE SOIL
'.OCATIONS AND
, OHS AT THESE
DENSITY
IAIIHER FALL! HG LEGEND FOR LOG OF
VEI'tY LOO.S£ BORINGS AND TEST PITS
LOOSE
MEDIUM DENSIT
DENSE
VEI'tY DENSE
rn .... . .. Creating a Safer Tomorrow "' N
N ..,
- "Do Nol Scale This Drawing"
~--,
)
)
f- ::!: >=-I w ::><11 w >- \!::.1~ ..... f- wz
::J,-... w w ...JQ
~ z.--. z.--. w....., ~Ol~ z ~~~ cn·cn WE wE ZE w~ g_ I <:-...... No. ::Jo. ~~ g 31~ wE o..g~ f- :::;o Zo. -'0. ~~ ~e, a. w ....... o~ ...JO: w ~~ ID f- ~~ >-
0 w w a. o:r z ,_ w a..
w
Ul -'
u G:
Ul 0
::J 0:: a.
ml
BORING NO. MP-1
COORDINATES ~
3,665.66
5,899.95
FIELD ENGINEER L. Velz DATE BEGAN . 8-24-88
EDITED BY L. Velz DATE FINISHED 8-24-88
CHECKED BY F. Tohse GROUND SURF ACE EL. 4.61 FT.
OF CASING EL. • 6.70 FT.
Ground water measured at 5.81 feet on 10-19-88.
Thin· interbeds of sand, dark gray, poorly graded. Iron staining in cloy increases.
At 18 feet, trace clay interbeds.
TOTAL DEPTH 22.5 FEET
NOTE: • SURVEYED ELEVATION OF PROTECTIVE WELL CASING.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
240827-02 MARKET PLACE SWAT
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow \,
10 -
15 -
20 -
r- -
1-
r- -
r- -
t-- ·-r-
-
-
-
r- -
r- 1-
·r- -
r- -
t-- -
r- -
t-- -
t-- -
r- -
r- -
.r- -....
PROJECT
CLIENT:
1TORY TEST DATA ......_
k
BORING NO. MP-2
>-1-
::i~ w
z~
-"' en, wE
L:iE NQ.
Za. :::;u w~
a::~ CD w a.
..
NO.
:2 =>V1
LUZ
w ..JQ
z~ w~ ~CD.-ZE wE t;;~[ ::Ja. ~a. ..JQ. >-O. a.g~
o~ x~ _,a: 1-
~~ o::c >-
:-:
1::
>-0::
<....J
:::;:::! :::;:U..
::::>~ ~IQ. (flu ~ ol:l: <
....JCD
if e~~ ....J w 3:
I~
~p-=-~
:: (4)
:-:-::
:-:· ·::.
!·:-::1: -::. Ml"'-
1--::::. -2
I= (4)
::::1-· ·::::.
t:l: :<:-:
1=:- .:::: 1: ....
1·:-:-:-1: .·:-:::: 1--
V1
u
Vl
::J
sw
cl
ch
ml
w
..J
G:
0 Q:
a.
r::::::
COORDINATES N;:-E ---1'
3 ~' 0*'3 7
<'->.
8 ~
7 6,390.57
FIELD ENGINEER L Velz DATE BEGAN 8-24-88
EDITED BY ----'='L--'-'Ve:::;lz,__ DATE FINISHED 8-24-88.
CHECKED BY F. Tohse ~~~U~,9 SURFACE EL. 5.76 FT.
DESCRIPTION.- ur CASING EL. • 7. 74 FT.
~:~7~t~w~LCA~fTE~~~~ silt, trace clay, trace gravel, moist, no
1.5'
~ott, green1sh gray CLAY to silty CLAY, some to trace gr~~~ and sand, iron stained, brick and wood fragments, trace cement - FILL MATERIAL Soft, greenish gray to dark gray silty CLAY, moist to very moist, moderate plasticity, laminated, micaceous, organic metter, rare gravel.
~ Ground water measured at 7.01 feet on 10-19-88.
3.5'
7.5'
Soft, brownish gray to gr~~sh.brown, SIL 1 with some clay,_ trace sand, moist to very moist, is fine grained, trace iron staining, micaceous, trace to some plant organics, trace thin bedding, generally mottled.
12.0'
~oft, sii~Y. CLAY, gre.enish gray, very moist,, high plasticity~ trace .sz. iron ~tainin~, trace to some dark organic manganese) material -:- mass1ve, m1caceous. . I== I==
1--
1--
Ground water first encountered between 13 and 14 feet. 14_0• '- S~ft, greenish gray to dark gray clayey SILT. wet, trace iro!l staining, m1caceous.
:::.1==
:::.1-- ·:::
1--
1--
:::
1-· -:-:
1--
1--
:::: ·:::
1--
1--:::
1;:.: ·:.
ml
TOTAL DEPTH 23.5 FEET
NOTE: • SURVEYED ELEVATION OF PROTECTIVE WELL CASING.
240827-02 MARKET PLACE SWAT
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS rn · ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS f')
BORING NO. MP-3
f-
w :I! >='I COORDINATES ~
3,240.28 w >- :::JVl
~lw "- t- wz w 5,522.62 :::;....., w w -.10 Ul-' V1 ..J ~ z~ z~ w~ OCD z :;::1~ u G: -rn f!:tr~
Ill" wE wE ZE w<[ g 31~
(11 0 FIELD ENGINEER L. Velz DATE BEGAN 8-24-88
J: ,1;E Na. ::Ja. ~a. :J ct:
f- Za. ..Ja. )-0. a.g-5 < CD I fl. EDITED BY L. Velz DATE FINISHED 8-24-88 fl. :::;:u W'-" o ...... X'-' t=~ w ct:'-" aJ f- _,tr
0 w ~5? w CHECKED BY SURFACE EL. 11.00 FT.
fl. o::c z CASING EL. • 10 80 FT ,.. "-' 11.
15 At 17 feet, cloy content increase, soil becomes SILT to clayey SILT. ml
TOTAL DEPTH 22.5 FEET
NOTE: • SURVEYED ELEVATION OF PROTECTIVE WELL CASING.
35.-.I---L-~--~--~~----~----L---~~--~------~------------------------------~ PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
240827-02 MARKET PLACE SWAT
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS m ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow
LABOR A TOR' TEST DATA
" ~~I
BORING NO. MP-4
f- )-
w I' ::1: a::
COORDINATES~
2,846.94 w )- ::>Ul <...J
\:::.1~ ... f- UJZ ::::;::! w 5,812.35
::J~ w w ...JQ ::::;U.. "'
..J
~ -en z~ z~ w~ wn~ ::::J:.: z ~~~ (J G: CD'-. WE wE ZE "'~ g_ (IJ(.)
g 31;Ji
(/) 0 FIELD ENGINEER L. Velz DATE BEGAN 8-25-88 :c L5E Na. ::::Ja. ~a. < ::::J a::
f- :::;:u Za. ..Ja. )-0. a.g~ ...JCD ~e1 a. EDITED BY L. Velz DATE FINISHED 8-25-88 a. a::~ w~ o~ x~ ...JO:: ...J w CD f-
~!2 w .... CHECKED BY F. Tahse GROUND SURFACE EL. 16.57 FT. 0 w 3: w a. o:c z DESCRIPTICJ~P OF CASING EL. • 17.55 FT. w t- a. 0 Loose. brown_ :>ANU, some silt, sli?~t!Y,_ mois~~~~~~t fragm,ents, brick >:-:-:-:-:-: and asphalt fragments, grass, wood chips, I deposits, trace I :>::
iron staining. Fill materiel.
.. :-:
f.- sw
;:/ ::< f.-
f.- ::::::-
f.- ::·-
1- jM! < ::: 5.0' f.- 5 -1 Medium dense, olive brown sll~y S~N~, moist, sand is fine _gr?ined, 1- (13) trace shell fragments, trace clay inclusions, slightly laminated, f.- - micaceous. 1- - sm
f- -
f.- - 8.0' f- - Loose _to medium dense, olive brown.:_l~~y SAND, some silt, moist, 1- - f- - sc trace_ iron staining, trace organic metter.
1- - · .. f.4P -4 10.0' f.- ) - t:::: t-:: -2 Soft to medium stiff, olive brown to olive grey CLAY, some silt, moist 1- - r:::: L:· (6) to very moist. highly plastic, massive, mottled, some iron staining f.- and plant organics, micaceous. 1- - r::: 1- - ch
f.- - [ j:::::
1- - ·. <j:: :::-
f.- ·: ::j:: ::-: 14.0' . ')--
_x gr~und wate: measured at 14.49 feet on 10-19-=as-:- · f.- j:: :-:. -:- Soft to medium stiff, dark gray to dark olive grey silty CLAY, some 15 t- cl sand, moist to very moist, low plasticity, micaceous, some plant f- j:: ·: .. organics. 16.0'
~-~--L:: Medium stiff, block, CLAY, very moist to wet hioh olc-sticifv. -165 f.- - - :::. .sz. Loose to medium d~nse, grey to dark grey silty SAND, wet, send is -:- fine to medium grained, poorly graded. f- -
-~
f.- sm Ground water first encountered between 17 and 18 feet.
L:-:1--l:-:-:: f-
19.5' f-
20 '- Medium stiff to stiff~_ olive brown ~lay~y SILT, some sand, wet to very moist, low plasticity, slightly laminated, trace iron staining 1- J-- and organic metter, micaceous. ;::.
1--::::::: At 23 feet, sand content decreases to trace to none. !::: ·::.
ml
·::·
25 1::.: 1--:-:-:
1- -
f- - --1== 1- --
f-
-:-:-;--
. - TOTAL DEPTH 28.1 FEET
1- --
30- NOTE: • SURVEYED ELEVA110N OF PROTECTIVE WELL CASING. f- --
1- --
1- --
f.- -
1- -
f- -
L.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
240827-02 MARKET PLACE SWAT
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
~-
~'
LABORATORY TEST DATA
f-
w :::;
w >- ::>Ul
u... f- wz
:J~ w w -'0
~ z~ z~ w~ ~CD-ffi~ wE wE ZE t;;~[ I ~E Na. :::>a. ':::la. f- Za. ..JQ. )-Q. a.g..9; a.. :::;o W'-' 0'-' X'-' _,o:: w a::'-' CD 1- ~~ 0 L.U
a.. QI
f-
0 5
10 1-
1-
1-
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
1-
1- i-
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -·
1- -
1- -
1- -
1-
1- -
1-20
1- -
1- -
1-
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
1-
1- -
1- i-
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- )-
1- -
1- -
1- -
1- -
-
1- -
-
1- -
1- -
L
........ >-a::
<(...J
::::;:::!
:::;U...
::::>:.::
(11~
..JCO
...J
w 3:
(> 1::--·
t::: 1-:-:·
~
! ~I ~lw Ul-' Ul
I~ 3: IC. u
II~:~
(/)
::l
t'\ ml
MD~~
1'1:'11
(21)
'::.
[< 1==1::>: "'"'
1::1::::::· MD~~
I:: l==t::::·: 2'~
1-- -:·:. (8) sp/
[: J::(: sm
J::
J:: .
L j::t::::·
1-- :-:-.-
:::.
1==;:-:-.
j:: :::.:
j::
:: l==k:> J:: ·:·:·
1:·: ~-- :-:-:
j--
1-- ·:·:·:
t:-:-.l==t:::
:-:-J::
sp/
'- sm
w ..J
G:
0 a:: a..
BORING NO. MP-5
COORDINATES~
2607.94
5996.05
FIELD ENGINEER K. Aordahl DATE BEGAN 1-19-89
EDITED BY K. Aardahl DATE FINISHED 1-19-89
CHECKED BY F. Tahse GROUND SURFACE EL. 14.89 FT.
_DESCR~Id~p OF CASING EL. • 16.69 FT.
Soft to -~edium ~til!- moderate oll'le brown (5Y 4/4) to olive gray (5Y 3/2) clayey SILT to sandy SILT, slightly moist; very fine to fine sand, micaceous, carbonaceous, traces of concrete debris.
Density changes to stiff to very stiff. Traces of angular, fine grained quartz sand.
8.0'
Loose to medium de_nse,_ mo_derate olive browr .(SY _4/4) to olive gray (5Y 4/1) SAND to silty SAND, slightly moist; very fine to fine sand, 15 percent clay, quartz rich, carbonaceous, thin laminations, cross bedding present, traces of orange mottling.
At 11.5 feet, trace rounded, flat, oblate gravel to 0.75 inch in diameter.
13.0'
<;ro~nd w_ater meas~red ~~ 1~;~6. f_e<;_!, on 1-:.31-89. ~ Medium dense, grayish olive tl . 4/~J to olive gray (5Y 3/2) SAND ..,. to silty SAND, very moist; very fine to fine sand, quartz artd mica rich, thin laminations of sand, traces of orange oxidation, negative reaction to h}'drchloric acid. Downhole methane reading equals zero.
No sample recovered at 15 feet.
.SZ. Wet at 16 feet, ground water encountered during drilling.
At approximately 21 fee!, traces of oxidized sand groins in thin layers.
TOTAL DEPTH 24.0 FEET
NOTE:
• SURVEYED ELEVA TlON OF PROTECTIVE WELL CASING.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
240827-02 MARKET PLACE SWAT
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow ,,
)
f-
w w "-
~
I 1-
a. w
0 r
r-
r
r r
r r
r
r
r r
r
r
r
r-
r
r-
r
r-
r
r-
r
r
r
r-
r
r-
r
r-
r
r
r-
r
r-
r-
r
r-
r
r
r
r
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
'
--------
-
1-
-
-
-
--
-
---
)-
-
-·
-
-
J-
-
-
>-f-
:::;....._
iii~
i:SE :::;;u oc'-' w a.
~TORY TEST DA T.
::l: ::JUl
wz
w w ...JQ
z~ z~ w~ ~CD~
Q[ WE wE t;;~[ Na. ::>a. Za. -'a. -'a. Cl.g~ W'-' 0'-' ~ ...... ...J~ CD f- ~~ QI ...
........ ~ BORING NO. MP-lA >-0::
~~I N Not surve;ied <::::J ~~~ :::0- w COORDINATES E Not surveyed :::;:1..1.. (/) --' z ~l!i u G: :::>::.:: FIELD ENGINEER (I)~ g 31~
(/) 0 K. Aardahl DATE BEGAN 9-26-88 ::> ~
....JCD a. EDITED BY K. Aardahl DATE FINISHED 9-26-88 < CD I ....J g:'-' ~ CHECKED BY F. Tahse GROUND SURFACE EL. Not meas. ..., z ..., u~ SCt<IPTION a.
NOTE: SEE BORING LOG MP 1 FOR LI1HOLOGIC DESCRIPTION.
TOTAL DEP1H 10.0 FEET
35--'--~-~~-~--~----~---~--~--~~-----------------------------~ PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
240827-02 MARKET PLACE SWAT
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow ('
I. )
LABORATORY TEST DATA
" i ~1 BORING NO. MP-2A
I- >-w ::1: a:: N Not surve:ted w >- ::>Ul <:::J ~ ~Jw "- I- ~~- ::1:- w COOROINA TES E Not surveyed :J..-- w w ::;;U. Ul-' (/) ..J
~ iii~ z..-- z~ w~ ~CD~ :::J:><: z ~~~ () G: WE wE Q~ a::E (/) 0 FIELD ENGINEER K. Aordohl DATE BEGAN 9-26-88 I i5E No. :Ja. ~;)~ Ul~ g ~1;:; :J 0::
I- zo. ..Ja_ >=a. _,co < m I 0. EDITED BY K. Aordohl DATE FINISHED 9-26-88 0. ::::!:0 W'-' 0'-' 0~ w a::'-' Ill I- x'-" ..JO:: ..J !=~
0 w ~~ ~ w CHECKED BY F. Tohse GROUND SURFACE EL. Not meos. a. o:r: z >-- w DESCRIPTION f-
0..
1- -
f- - NOTE: SEE BORING LOG MP-2 FOR UTHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION. 1- - 1- -- -- ...,
- --'
IJ;;~
- ...,
- -J
-
"' ~ !J:IfST lift
1-
JT ffi:krr IP.2A~ E ::II
<l> TOTAL DEPTH 9.0 FEET
10 -
15 ~
20 -
-
-
-
25 -
1-
-
-
-
-
1- -
'- 35
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
240827-02 MARKET PLACE SWAT
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS FOR EXPLANA nON OF SYMBOLS AND nERMS
\TORY TES \T,
"" BORING NO. MP-3A ,_ >-w :l; 0:: :I~, COORDINATES N Not surveyed w >- :::JC/l q:...J ~~~ "- ,_ wz ::::;;:! w
::J.-. w w ...JQ (IJ ..J E Not surveyed
w,..... ~CD~ ::::;LL ~10.. ~ iii~ z ...... z ...... :::J:,: (.) G: WE WE ZE w~[ (/)~ g 31~ (IJ 0 FIELD ENGINEER K. Aardahl DATE BEGAN 9-26-88
I ~E No. ::lo. ~a. ::l a:: ,_ Zo. -'a. >-O. ll.g._e _JCil ~ el(ll 0.. EDITED BY K. Aardahl 0.. ::;;u W'-" o ....... X'-' DATE FINISHED 9-26-88 w a::'-' ID 1- _,a:: _J
0 w ~\2 w CHECKED BY F. Tahse GROUND SURFACE EL. Not meas.
0.. QI 3:
I~ ,_ DESCRIPTION 0
NOTE: SEE BORING LOG MP-3 FOR LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION.
-
---
.';~~
5 -
- rr~
IT~ -
1fu:=;rr
- ll
I~
~
UC.JJ
- I~
10 II
E I.,JI
- :12~ TOTAL DEPTH 10.5 FEET
-
-
-
f- -,_ -
f- -,_ -
f- ; -
1- -
f- -
f-
f- -
-
--
1-
-
- -
f- -,_ -,_ ---
-
25 -
-
)-
--
-
1- -,_ -
f- -
1- -,_ -
'-35
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
240~27-02·MARKET PLACE SWAT
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow .SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
)
~A TORY TEST DATA
' ~ BORING NO. MP-4A
1- >-
~PI w :::! a:: · N Not surveyed w >- :::JUl <(-'
!!;.I~ "'- 1- wz ::::;::::! w COORDINATES E Not surveyed ::::;,..,. w w ...JQ :::;:U.. V1 _J £; z~
~E'
w~ oco z \£1~ u G: iii~ WE ZE ~a::~ :::J~ V1 0 FIELD ENGINEER K .. Aardahl DATE BEGAN 9-26-88 w<[ Vlu g 31~ J: ~E Na_ ::::Ja. ~a. <( ::::J a::
1- Za. ...Ja. >-C. a.g~ _,en a. EDITED BY K. Aardahl DATE FINISHED 9-26-88 a. ::::;u w~ o~ x~ ..Jet: -' < CD I w a::-:-- ID 1-
~~= ~
e:~
CHECKED BY F. Tahse GROUND SURFACE EL. Not meas. 0 w w a. o:z: z 1- w DESCRIPTION 1- 0
<1.
1- -
1- NOTE: SEE BORING LOG MP 4 FOR LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION. - -
1- -
1- --
1- ' -
-~~~
-
5 - .
-- II liEll (23) 13E - IE=
. - llf=:!IE
1- - m= liE -
:ITE Jll=
·~ .I
llr== 311=== '
10 lli=== lll===
·2 TOTAL DEPTH 10.5 FEET (4)
-
15 ..
-
~
-
-
-
-
- --
20-
-
--
-
25-
--
-
-
-
-
-
1- --
1- ) --
1- -
-
--
1- -
-
1- --
~
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
240827-02 MARKET PLACE SWAT
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
BORING LOGS
SEAL BEACH FAULT INVESTIGATION
35,5 86,5
20 29.5 97,5
25 30
35 BORING NO. B-1
COORDINATES~ ~~i =~~=:~
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kroft DATE BEGAN 8-12-88
EDITED BY DATE FINISHED Redrill 8-23-88
CHECKED BY GROUND SURFACE EL. 5.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
Soft, oli..., (SY 4/3) sondy CLAY, moist. medium plastic, abundant mica and biotite frogmen ts. Vfllf'Y wet from 21 to 23 feet.
Loose, olive gray (SY 4/2) silty SAND and SAND, moist to wet, sand is Rne grained, well sorted, abundant biotite fragments.
Sand flowing into augers from 25-35 feet.
Vtry looM sand, saturated.
Flowing water at 40 feet on 8-23-88.
Vtry loose, gray brown SAND. appears completely saturated, fine to medium grained, silty, abundant biotite.
Medium dense to dense, dark gray (N4) SAND and silty SAND, moist -.-y moist, send is t)pically fine grained. abundant shell fragments and biotite.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:,
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVES~
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
m ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS FOR EXPLANATION_ OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
(.
< I
( \)
\ .
f-.
w w "-
~
iE
Q_
w
0 75
80 85
w
Ul ..J
u c:::
Ul 0
::J a:
Q_
BORING NO. B-1
N Not surveyed
COORDINATES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kroft
EDITED BY. __ __:R..:.:.i""ch'-'-'K"-'ro..,_f_,_t
CHECKED BY_--'--"=-""-'!.!.>!.!..
DATE BEGAN 8-12-88
DATE FINISHED Red rill 8-23-88
GROUND SURFACE EL 5.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
Dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1) SILT and CLAY interlominotions, macrofossils including gastropods (Turritella sp.), bivalves and shell hash. ·
TOTAL DEPTH 91.5 FEET
NOTE:
S - Modified California Sampler (2-1/2" x 18")
C - Continuous core sampler (3" x 60")
Boring drilled to 35.0 feet on 8-12-88, hole was redri/led and advanced to a total depth of 91.5 feet on 8-23-88.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
23106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANA T/ON OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
( \
I \
w
l/1 ...J
() G:
V1 0
::J 0::
(l_
49 22
55 60
65,_-+--r-~---+--~-----
BORING NO. B-lA
N Not surveyed
COOROINA TES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kroft DATE BEGAN 8-16-88
EDITED BY Rich Kroft DATE FINISHED 8-16-88
CHECKED BY GROUND SURFACE EL. 5.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
abundant biotite fragments.
At 8 feet, grades to soft, alive brown (2.5Y 4/4) and olive gray (SY 4/2) clayey SAND, wet, very fine grained quartz sand, thinly laminated, abundant mica.
At 19.5 feet; 3-inch olive CLAY.
At 23 feet; Top of Upper Aquifer, top of saturated,
approximately 10 feet of fill in augers.
dark olive gray (5Y 3/2) clayey SAND and sondy
fine to medium grained, occasionally coarse.
Reddish brown clay mottling, very dark gray (5Y 3/1) sandy CLAY interlaminations up to 2 inches thick, abundant mica.
Top of Pleistocene sediments.
Medium dense, dark gray (2.5Y N4) silty SAND, fine grained, sharp horizon tal upper con tact.
Becoming v.ery dense with abundant shell fragments at 63 feet.
Refusal with continuous core at 65.0 feet.
TOTAL DEPTH 65.0 FEET
NOTE:
S - Modified California Sampler (2-1/2" x 18")
S.P. - Standard penetration 1 Barrel (1" x 18")
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow (
\
\ )
f-.
w w ....
?;
:r: f-.
Cl. w
0 0
5 10
15 20
35 40
60 65
70 --'--"---'-----'-~---'-----J
w VI ..J
u (;::
VI 0
::J a::
Cl.
BORING NO. B-2
COORDINATES
N Not surveyed
E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kraft
EDITED BY __ __,_R-'-'ic"'-h,__,_,_K~ra!.!.ft~
CHECKED BY_-=='-"-'=.:.:."'-
DATE BEGAN 8-18-88
DATE FINISHED 8-18-88
GROUND SURFACE EL. 5 ft.
(APPROX.)
Ground water first encountered at 11 feet on 8-18-88.
Medium dense, dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1) SAND and silty SAND, moist to wet. Sand is very fine grained, well sorted, abundant biotite, muscovite and hornblende fragments.
Grades to silty SAND at .35 feet. Some light olive brawn (2.5Y 5/4) iron staining, typically massive, few subhorizontal bedding planes. gray
grained, consists of quartz, feldspar and fragments.
Flowing sand at 4.3 feet, pulled augers and redrilled with wooden plug to penetrate loose zone.
Very loose SAND, wet, very fine grained.
Medium dense, dark gray (2.5Y N/4) SAND, wet, coarse grained, same fine to medium sand.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
[[] ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
(·
I, l
"' ........ u z
>- < a:: :;:; >="I <-' :::;;::! rfi~l~ w
:::;LL VJ ..J
0::: Ulla. u G: :::l:.:: z!i::::; VJ 0 (flu g :31~ < :::J a:: _,co ~e1 a. -' w I-
:;:: "' z
"' a.
BORING NO. B-2
N Not surve~ed
COORDINATES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich· Kroft DATE BEGAN 8-18-88
EDITED BY Rich Kroft DATE FINISHED 8-18-88
CHECKED BY Glenn Ozima GROUND SURFACE El. 5.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
10 feet of loose sand- fill in augers after sampling at 80 feet.
Pulled augers to surface. Augers filled with slough to approximately 50 feet. Redrilled to 95 feet with wooden plug to ovoid loose sand zone.
Loose, medium to dark gray SAND, wet, coarse grained, some fine to medium sand, some silt.
TOTAL DEPTH 100.0 FEET
NOTE:
S - Modified California Sam.P.Ier (2-1/2" x 18")
ST - Shelby Tube (3" x 36 )
C - Continuous core sampler (3" x 60")
S.P. - Standard penetration Split-Barrel (1" x 18")
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
()
f-
w w u.. w
V1 ...J
~ u G:
V1 0
J: :::l a::
f- a.. a.. w
0 0
5 33.0 91.5
10 BORING NO. B-3
· N Not surveyed
COORDINATES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kraft DATE BEGAN 8-17-88
EDITED BY ----'R-"'ic,h"---"K"-'ra~f~t
CHECKED BY_-'-"""'--"'!.!.~
DATE FINISHED 8-17-88
GROUND SURFACE EL. 7.0 FT.
I
very fine grained,
abundant mica.
Ground water first encountered at 9.0 feet on 8-17-88.
is very fine grained.
(APPROX.)
Sand flowing into sugers at 30 feet. unable to sample, installed wooden plug into augers.
Loose, dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1) SAND, wet, sand is very fine grained, well sorted, abundant biotite, muscovite and hornblende fragments.
Becoming fine to medium grained, predominantly quartz and feldspar, some lithic fragments.
Approximate top of Pleistocene sediments - slight increase resistance, increase in coarse send and pebbles.
Medium dense, dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1) SAND. wet,
grained, sand is completely unconsolidated.
No core recovery with continuous care sampler with catcher installed; probable loose sand. Core barrel dropped approximately 1 foot below lead auger at 70.0 and 80.0 feet due to very loose character of th'e sand.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
m ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
11 \ )
/)
I-
w w u.
~
:r: I-
Cl. w
0 70
135
BORING NO. B-3
COORDINATES
N Not surveyed
E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER
EDITED BY
CHECKED BY
Rich Kraft DATE BEGAN 8-17-88
Rick Kraft DATE FINISHED 8-17-88
Paul Smith GROUND SURFACE EL. 7.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
Very loose material, no sample return, less than 300 lbs. drilling pressure, saturated sand 'on auger flight.
Trace rounded pebbles and abundant coarse send comming up augers.
Loose, dark gray (5Y 4/1) SAND, wet, fine .grained, consists of quartz end feldspar, abundant biotite.
Scattered shell frogmen ts, rounded lithic pebbles and grovels up to 2 inches in diameter.
TOTAL DEPTH 106.5 FEET
NOTE:
S - Modifiec;f California Sampler (2-1/2" x 18")
S.P. - Standard Penetration Split Barrel (1" x18")
C - Continuous core scm pier ( 3" x 60")
Electrical conductivity of ground water at 70 feet is 14,800 umhos. 140~--~--~--~--~--~----~----~----~--L-~--------------~--------------------------------~ PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST ..
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow (- \ I
\
f-
LLJ
LLJ u.
"' ~ ()
(I)
·I ::J
f-
ll.
LLJ
0 0
5 35 12 27.0 92.5
10 31.0 92.5
10 109
20 27.0 98.5
27.0 96.5
39.5 82.0
35 40 25.5 96.5
50 26.5 101.0
55 60
LLJ
-l
G:
0 a::
ll.
BORING NO. B-4
N Not surveyed
COORDINATES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kraft
EDITED BY -----'R~i_,ch~K"-'ro"-'f.!..t
CHECKED BY_---'~~:.!.!!.!.!.!..
DATE BEGAN 8-19-88
DATE FINISHED 8-19-88
GROUND SURFACE EL. 5.0 FT
(APPROX.)
Grades to medium stiff, dark greenish gray (SGY 4/1) CLAY, moist, high plasticity.
Very dense, dark greenish gray (SGY 4/1) silty SAND, moist; massive.
Sand is very fine grained, well sorted.
Slight organic odor.
Abundant shell fragments including bivalves, gastropods, (Turitello sp.).
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS FOR EXPLANA TlON OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
(
I )
)
f-
w w
"-
~
I f-
0.. w
0 70
75 80
85 90
95 120
125
w
Vl --'
(.) G:
Vl 0
::> a:: c..
BORING NO. B-4
N Not surveyed
COORDINATES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER
EDITED BY
Rich Kraft DATE BEGAN 8-19-88
Rich Kroft DATE FINISHED 8-19-88
CHECKED BY_~~~~ GROUND SURFACE EL. 5.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
91.0'
ntered pressurized gas zone at approximately 91.0 feet. Gas blowing up well annulus and auger stem for approximately 3 hours.
Allowed well to vent from 8-19 to 8-22-88. Filled boring with bentonite pellet plug and bentonite slurry prior to removing augers.
TOTAL DEPTH 92.5 FEET
NOTE:
S - Modified California Som,r.ler (2-1/2" x 18")
ST - Shelby Tube (3" x 36 )
140~----'-----'-----'-----'-----'-------'-----~------'---~~------------------------------------------------~ PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS m ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow (~ \
\ j
0 w U1 ..J
u [<:
U1 0
:::J 0::
0..
sm
BORING NO. B-5
N Not surveyed
COORDINATES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kroft DATE BEGAN ----'8"--_,2:..:3:....--=8"'-8 EDITED BY ------'R'-"i~che!....!:K~r:::_of~t
CHECKED BY _ ___:-=:.....=::~~
DATE FINISHED 8-23-88
GROUND SURFACE EL. 5.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
Thin CLAY and fine SAND laminations at 9.0 feet. some thin laminations of mica flakes.
thin, fine grained ;'" •a~'"-';"
for upper con tact, 45 de<;ree dip
of Upper Aquifer.
Medium dense, dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1) silty SAND, wet, sand is fine grained, well sorted, abundant mica flakes.
Pulled augers at 20 feet to install wooden plug to ovoid flowing sand.
Interbedded SAND and CLAY, soft to medium stiff, moist to wet. clay is highly plastic.
gray SAND, wet, some silt and clay, sand is very
Dense, dark gray (N4) SAND. moist to wet, sand is medium grained. some fine, consists of quartz and feldspar with abundant biotite and hornblende, thin sub-horizontal laminations.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
(I
\
)
f-.
w w ....
~
I f-.
Q_
w
0 70
75 80
85 90
95 100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
(/)
(.)
(/)
::J
~
[L
0 a::
Q_
BORING NO. B--5
COORD-INATES N Not surveyed
E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER
EDITED BY
Rich Kroft DATE BEGAN 8-23-88
Rich Kroft DATE FINISHED 8-23-88
CHECKED BY _ __!_~...::!.!..!.2~ GROUND SURFACE EL. 5.0 FT. gray
sandy SILT, moist, 1
scattered shell fragments.
(APPRO X.)
Contorted bedding at 71.0 feet, possibly fault related, possible soft sediment deformation.
gray
sand is very fine grained,
slightly disturbed.
TOTAL DEPTH 91.5 FEET
NOTE:
S - Modified California Sampler (2-1/2" x 18")
140~--J---~--L---L-~~--~----~-----L--L-~--------------------------------------------~ PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS m ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow (']
' '
' )' ,_
/
>-w w "- Vl
~ u
(/)
I :J
>-a. w
0 0
sm
5 35.5 86.0
10 33.5 90.0
15 34 12 25.0 100.0
20 30.5 93.5
25 30
35 40
45 50
55 24.5 102.0
60 w
_J
G:
0 a:: a.
BORING NO. B_:_ 6
N Not surveyed
COORDINATES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kraft DATE BEGAN 8-29-88
EDITED BY __ __,R-"i""ch.!...-"K"-'ra~f~t
CHECKED BY _ __,_,~~!.!..
DATE FINISHED 8-29-88
GROUND SURFACE EL. 7.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
Medium dense. dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1) silty SAND, wet. sand is fine to medium grained, moderately sorted, abundant biotite and lithic fragments, angular to subangular.
3-inch CLAY seam at. 20.0 feet.
Grading at 23.5 feet to loose SAND, wet, medium to coarse grained, consists of quartz, feldspar and lithic fragments.
Flowing SAND at 25.0 feet. completely saturated, 10 feet of fill in augers after sampling.
Very loose SAND, wet, fine grained, some silt and cloy interbeds.
Loose, medium gray (N5) SAND, wet. sand is fine to coarse grained, some pebbles, poorly sorted.
Approximate top of Pleistocene sediments, increase in drilling resistance.
Very dense, dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1) silty SAND, moist, send is very fine grained, well sorted,. scattered biotite.
Thin, regular, sub-horizontal laminations, slightly moist.
Few thin (1 inch) stiff CLAY interlaminations, few shell fragments. dark grey (N4) silty SAND end sandy SILT,
rracrm•'""' from 68.5 to 70.0 feet.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
(' ; 1
\
f-
w w u.. w
(II _J
~ u G:
(II 0
J: ::J 0:
f- a.. a.. w
0 70
75 80
85 904--+---~-4--+-~---
95 100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
BORING NO. B-6
COORDINATES N Not surveyed E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kraft DATE BEGAN
EDITED BY Rich Kraft DATE FINISHED
CHECKED BY GROUND SURFACE EL.
gray
medium plastic, abundant fine
gastropod shell fragments, send is very
At 83.5 feet, grades to stiff CLAY with SAND.
TOTAL DEPTH 90.0 FEET
NOTE:
S - Modified California Sampler (2-1/2" x 18")
8-29-88
8-29-88
7.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
140~--L-~---L--~~~--~-----L----L--L~L_ ________________________________________ _j PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TIERMS ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow (
\
)
...
LLJ
LLJ ..... LLJ
"'
....J
~ () G:
"' 0
::r:: ::::> a::
1- Cl.
Cl.
LLJ
0 0
5 10
15 .4)
BORING NO . B-7
N Not surve:ted
COORDINATES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER Rich Kraft DATE BEGAN 8-30-88
EDITED BY Rich Kraft DATE FINISHED 8-30-88
CHECKED BY GROUND SURFACE EL. 7.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
Medium dense, dark greenish gray (5GY 4/1) SAND, wet, with silt and clay, sand is very fine to medium grained, moderately sorted, abundant biotite.
Grades to sandy CLAY and sandy SJL T from 26.0 to 28.5 feet.
Sand flowing into augers at 35.0 feet, pull augers and install wooden plug to pass through flowing sand zone.
Dense, dark gray (5Y 1/1) SAND, wet, with silt, fine to medium grained, moderately sorted, abundant biotite.
Approximate top of Pleistocene sediments, increase in drHiing resistance.
Dense, dark gray (N4) SAND and
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
BORING NO. B-7
N Not surveyed
COOROINA TES E Not surveyed
FIELD ENGINEER
EDITED BY
Rich Kraft DATE BEGAN 8-30-88
Rich Kraft DATE FINISHED 8-30=88
CHECKED BY _ ___;~!!...!:~:!..!.. GROUND SURFACE EL. 7.0 FT. (APPROX.)
At 75.0 feet, grades to stiff, sandy CLAY, moist.
Grades to very stiff, dark gray (N4) and dark greenish gray (SGY 4/1) sandy SILT and sandy CLAY, slightly moist. with light gray sand laminations and greenish gray cloy laminations.
Abundant bivalve and gastropod shell fragments.
TOTAL DEPTH 90.0 FEET
NOTE:
S - Modified California Sampler (2-1/2" x 18").
ST - Shelby Tube (3" x 36").
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
\
)
/
0 .31.5 92.0
33.5 88.0
.31.5 92.0
28.0 97.0
UJ
u
UJ
::J
':l
G:
0 0::
0..
BORING NO. B-8
· N Not surveyed
COORDINATES E Not surveyed
DATE BEGAN 9-6-88
DATE FINISHED 9-6-88
GROUND SURFACE EL. 7.0 FT.
(APPRO X.)
CLAY, moist, highly plastic,
Ground water measured at 27.0 feet on 9-6-88.
1--i~~~-~ of Upper Aquifer. .
Medium dense, dork green gray (5GY 4/1) siTty SAND and cklyey SAND, moist to wet, sand is fine to medium grained, abundant lithic fragments, well sorted, abundant biotite flakes.
Grades to unconsolidated SAND, wet, massive, abundant biotite.
Saturated sand returns on augers.
Medium dense grey (N5) SAND, very moist to wet, send· is fine to medium grained with abundant block and green lightic fragments, massive, abundant biotite, clean, no silt or cloy.
Medium dense, gray (NS) SAND. wet. fine to medium grained, angular to subcngular, massive, no matrix or interbeds, predominantly quartz end feldspar with hornblende, saturated send cuttings in augers.
Medium dense dense, olive (5Y 4/3) silty SAND, slightly moist, send is predominantly fine with some medium to coarse groins, moderately to poorly· sorted, laminated with irregular white mottling (caliche ?), probable highly weathered shell fragments. Note - increase in density, predominantly fine send. 57.0'
Dense, gray (N5). SAND, wet, sand is medium to very coarse grained, angular to subrounded, quartz. feldspar, gray lithic fragments . . occasional pebbles, clean, no cloy or silt matrix, massive.
No sample return from 63.5 to 65 feet, probable unconsolidated sand.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
(
\
f--
w w u..
~
I f--
Q_
w a
70 75
80 85~--~--,_ __ ,_ __ ,_ __ ,_ __ ___
{50/.5)
90 95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
BORING No.· B-8
N Not surveyed
COOROINA TES E Not surveyed
DATE BEGAN 9-6-88
DATE FINISHED 9-6-88
GROUND SURFACE EL. 5.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
Large amounts of loose, saturated sand coming up augers. hole is wet, augers becoming very tight.
Dense, dark green gray (5GY 4/1) SAND, wet, fine to medium grained, clean, no silt Of' clay matrix, well sorted, color due to abundant biotite flakes. At 79.5 feet, abundant coarse sand and pebbles up to 1/2 inches in diameter, loose, subrounded.
Loose· gravels at 85.0 feet.
TOTAL DEPTH 85.0 FEET
NOTE:
S - Modified California Sampler (2-1/2" x 18").
140~--~--~--~--~--~----~----~----~--~~------------------------------------------------~ PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow )
i
j
(50/.4)
BORING NO. B-9
COORDINATE. S N Not surveyed
E Not surveyed
DATE BEGAN 9-6-88
DATE FINISHED 9-5-88
GROUND SURFACE EL. 7.0 FT.
(APPROX.)
Medium dark gray (5Y 4/1) snty SAND, wet, with silt and clay interbeds up to 2 inches thick.
Grades to dark gray (N4). silty SAND. loose. sand is very wet, fine grained.
28.0 feet on 9-6-88.
Medium dense, dark gray (N4) SAND with silt, wet, sand is fine grained, very well sorted, massive, abundant biotite.
Dense SAND, moist to wet. fine to medium grained, wet material coming up augers, main wet zone of upper aquifer. Sampler shoe spooned by dense sand material.
28.0'
Hard drilling at 42.0 feet, 1,000 psi down pressure, sampler stuck due to flowing sand in augers, pulled augers to surface. Hole makes significant water from .35 to 45 feet, some oil staining and iridescence.
Medium dense. dark gray (5Y 4/1) silty SAND and SAND, wet, possible grovel interbeds (uneven drilling), sand is fine to medium, moderately sorted, abundant fine mica, irregular sand and clay interlominations, convoluted, abundant irregular iran staining.
Approximate top of Pleistocene sediments.
Stiff, dark gray (5Y 4/1) sandy SILT, slightly moist, some iron sand and cia interbeds, mottled
Dense, gray (N5) SAND. wet. sand is medium to coarse grained. no sil or cloy matrix, clean, some hydrogen sulfide odor and tor staining, massive, abundant black lithic fragments and biotite Rakes.
Dense, gray (NS) SAND with grovel, wet, sand is predominantly coarse to very coarse grained, some fine to medium, well graded, consists of quartz/feldspar and multi-colored lithic fragments, angular to sub rounded, trace of silt in matrix. Sampler refusal on pebble layer at
64.5 feet.
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
rn ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
r-,
)
BORING NO. B-9
f-
LLJ
COORDINATES N Not surveyed LLJ (CON'T)
"- LLJ
Ul _.J E Not surve;ted
:!; (.) G:
Ul 0 FIELD ENGINEER R. Kroft DATE BEGAN 9-6-88
I ::l a::
f- a.. EDITED BY P. Smith DATE FINISHED 9-6-88 a.. LLJ CHECKED BY GROUND SURFACE EL. 7.0 FT. 0 {APPROX.)
70 74 0'
dense, dark gray (SY 4/1) silty SAND, wet, sand is fine well sorted, abundant fine biotite flakes. ·
TOTAL DEPTH 75.0 FEET
NOTE:
S ~ Modified California Sampler (2-1/2" x 18")
PROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
242106 SEAL BEACH FAULT INVEST.
BIXBY RANCH COMPANY
[D ... Creating a Safer Tomorrow SEE LEGEND FOR LOGS AND TEST PITS
FOR EXPLANATION OF SYMBOLS AND TERMS
)
APPENDIX F
WATER WELL DATA FOR WELLS
LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE
/--~,
~)
~ '~
TABLE F-1
WATER WELL DATA WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE MARKET PLACE LANDFILL PROJECT NO. 240827
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION ( ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft) ELEVATION (ft) 04S/12W-34B02 U-05.A5 12.5 10-26-79 50.1 -37.6
04S/12W-34B03 U-05.A5 12.5 05-08-79 37.9 -25.4
04S/12W-34C01 U-05.A5 · 23.0 08-21-51 55.7 -32.7
04S/12W-34J01 U-05.A5 79.0 04-17-68 90.0 -11.0
04S/12W-34N01 U-05.A5 . 79.4 04-27-78 95.5 -16.1
04S/12W-35A01 U-05.A5 11.0 06-24-80 22.6 -11.6
04S/12W-35A03 U-05.A5 12.5 03-16-79 16.0 -3.5
04S/12W-35A04 U-05.A5 12.5 03-16-79 24.0 -11.5
04S/12W-35C01 U-05.A5 10.6 04-19-73 48.5 -37.9
04S/12W-35C02 U-05.A5 11.0 05-01-79 27.7 -16.7
04S/12W-35C03· U-05.A5 12.0 02-02-55 39.8 -27.8
04S/12W-35E01 U-05.A5 10.1 04-10-74 24.6 -14.5
04S/12W-35F01 U-05.A5 10.0 03-21-79 12.5 -2.5
04S/12W-35H01 U-05.A5 10.7 11-29-78 42.8 -32.1
04S/12W-35H02 U-05.A5 10.0 10-24-79 13.5 -3.5
04S/12W-35H03 U-05.A5 9.2 09-25-43 9.2 0.0
SIX:0827-wells 1.
,.---- --.., /)
'-----/ '---~·
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft) MEASUREMENT WATER {ft) ELEVATION {ft) 04S/12W-35H04 U-05.A5 10.7 06-24-80 19.4 -8.7
04S/12W-35H05 U-05.A5 11.9 05-28-80 31.0 -19.1
04S/12W-35J01 U-05.A5 9.0 06-24-80 15.4 -6.4
04S/12W-35J02 U-05.A5 9.0 03-30-79 13.9 -4.9
04S/12W-35J03 U-05.A5 9.0 03-30-79 13.4 -4.4
04S/12W-35J04 U-05.A5 8.0 06-09-65 16.4 -8.4
04S/12W-35J05 U-05.A5 9.0 03-14-79 12.7 -3.7
04S/12W-35J06 U-05.A5 9.0 06-24-80 27.3 -18.3
04S/12W-35J07 U-05.A5 10.0 06-24-80 26.4 -16.4
04S/12W-35K01 U-05.A5 9.4 04-12-79 2.·1 7.3
04S/12W-35K02 U-05.A5 9.0 10-30-75 22.1 -13.1
04S/12W-35K03 U-05.A5 9.0 04-12-79 11.4 -2.4
04S/12W-35K04 U-05.A5 11.0 04-16-79 15.8 -4.8
04S/12W-35K05 U-05.A5 9.0 04-16-79 11.4 -2.4
04S/12W~35K06 U-05.A5 9.0 03-21-79 14.2 -5.2
04S/12W-35K07 U-05.A5 9.0 03-12-79 22.3 . -13.3
04S/12W-35M01 U-05.A5 60.0 10-24-79 74.7 -14.7
SIX:0827-wells 2
"~ >)
' ~ '---'
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
' STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION ( ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft) ELEVATION (ft) 04S/12W-35P01 U-05.A5 57.0 12-21-76 74.1 -17.1
04S/12W-35P02 U-05.A5 57.0 12-21-76 60.5 -3.5
04S/12W-35P03 U-05.A5 73.7 03-31-78 97.1 -23.4
04S/12W-35P04 U-05.A5 73.7 03-21-79 84.5 -10.8
04S/12W-35Q01 U-05.A5 19.6 09-04-69 18.4 1.2
04S/12W-35Q02 U-05.A5 21.3 04-18-69 19.0 2.3
04S/12W-35Q03 U-05.Fl 15.8 12-05-49 DRY
04S/12W-35R01 U-05.A5 10.5 11-19-58 DRY
04S/12W-35R02 U-05. F1 8.8 12-16-53 4.0 4.8
04S/12W-35R03 U-05.A5 9.0 04-12-79 10.5 -1.5
04S/12W-35R04 U-05.A5 9. 3 06-24-80 12.0 -2.7
04S/12W-35R05 U-05.A5 10.0 03-09-65 25.5 -15.5
04S/12W-35R06 U-05. F1 10.0 08-03-51 10.0 0.0
04S/12W-35R07 U-05. F1 10.0 12-05-49 DRY
04S/12W-35R08 U-05.Fl 10.0 12-05-49 DRY
04S/12W-35R09 U-05.A5 8.6 06-24-80 12.9 -4.9
04S/12W-35R10 U-05.A5 9.0 11-30-78 8.9 0.1
SIX:0827-wells 3
')
'~
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION ( ft )· MEASUREMENT WATER {ft} ELEVATION {ft) 04S/12W-35Rll U-05.A5 9.0 06-24-80 13.7 -4.7
04S/12W-35R12 U-05.A5 9.0 11-30-78 13.8 -4.8
04S/12W-35R13 U-05.A5 9.0 04-16-79 11.2 -2.2
04S/12W-35R14 U-05.A5 9.0 04-12-79 9.1 -0.1
04S/12W-35R16 U-05.A5 9.0 03-13-79 8.4 0.6
04S/12W-35R17 U-05.A5 9.0 03-13-79 4.8 4.2
04S/12W-35R18 U-05.A5. 9.0 03-13-79 7.2 1.8
04S/12W-35R19 U-05.A5 9.0 03-13-79 17.5 -8.5
04S/12W-36C01 U-05.A5 14.0 08-20-85 27.8 -13.8
04S/12W-36D01 U-05.A5 13.5 04-06-78 16.2 -2.7
04S/12W-36E01 U-05.A5 24.7 11-15-78 41.9 -17.2
04S/12W-36E02 U-05.A5 24.7 11-15-78 30.0 -5.3
04S/12W-36G01 U·-05. F1 14.0 06-22-,59 55.0 -41.0
04S/12W-36H01 U-05.Fl 12.0 06-13-34 9.8 2.2
04S/12W-36J02 U-05. F1 12.0 07-14-74 38.9 -26.9
04S/12W-36M01 U-05.A5 22.3 06-24-80 43.7 -21.4
04S/12W-36M02 U-05.A5 22.1 06-24-80 29.7 -7.6
SIX:0827-wells 4
<-)
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft) ELEVATION (ft) 04S/12W-36M03 U-05.A5 22.1 04-16-79 14.3 7.8
04S/12W-36M04 U-05.A5 22.3 04-16-79 17.3 5.0
04S/12W-36N01 U-05. F1 8;.0 -11-15-78 16.0 -8.0
04S/12W-36N02 U-05.A5 11.0 11-16-78 9.9 1.1
04S/12W-36N03 U-05.A5 11.0 11-16-78 14.3 -3.3
I
04S/12W-36N04 U-05.A5 10.6 04-17-79 8.8 1.8
04S/12W-36N05 U-05.Fl 8.0 11-01-77 DRY
04S/12W-36N06 U-05. F1 23.1 03-21-79 23.8 -0.7
04S/12W-36N07 U-05. F1 23.1 04.-29-70 35.8 -12.7
04S/12W-36N08 U-05. F1 2.3 04-18-79 3.9 -1.6
04S/12W-36N09 U-05.A5 23.1 03-21-79 33.5 -10.4
04S/12W-36P01 U-05. F1 8.2 03-23-79 13.6 -5.4
04S/12W-36P02 U-05.Fl 8.2 11-04-76 41.2 . -33.0
04S/12W-36P03 U-05.Fl 8.8 03-15-79 10.7 -1.9
04S/12W-36P04 U-05.Fl 8.8. 11-15-78 11.1 -2.3
04S/12W-36P05 U-05. F1 8.8 03-15-79 9.6 -0.8
04S/12W-36P06 U-05. Fl 8.8 03-15-79 18.8 -10.0
SIX:0827-wells 5
/,~~
'-~
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STAT~ HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft) MEASUREMENT WATER {ft} ELEVATION (ft} 05S/12W-01A01 U-05. F1 12.2 12-06-34 5.9 +6.3
05S/12W-01C01 U-05.Fl 6.8 03-28-79 11.5 -:-4.7
05S/12W-01C02 U-05. F1 6.8 03-28-79 19.9 -13.1
05S/12W-01D01 U-05. F1 5.6 03-28-79 9.1 -3.5
05S/12W-01D02 U-05. F1 5.6 03-28-79 8.8 -3.2
05S/12W-01D03 U-05.Fl 5.6 03-28-79 8.8 -3.2
05S/12W-01D04 U-05. F1 10.0 03-02-79 11.0 -1.0
05S/12W-01E01 U-05.A5 9.0 11-28-78 46.0 -37.0
05S/12W-01E02 U-05.A5 9.0 06-25-80 11.3 -2.3
05S/12W-01E03 U-05.A5 9.0 11-28-78 14.9 -5.9
05S/12W-01E04 U-05. F1 5.4 03-29-79 9.6 -4.2
05S/12W-01E05 U-05.Fl 5.4 03-29-79 10.3 -4.9
05S/12W-01E06 U-05. F1 5.4 03-29-79 9.1 -3.7
05S/12W-01E07 U-05. F1 5.4 03-29-79 17.0 -11.6
05S/12W-01E08 U-05.Fl 6.7 06-25-80 19.0 -12.3
05S/12W-01E09 U-05.Fl 6.7 06-25-80 10.6 -3.9
05S/12W-01El0 U-05.Fl 6.7 06-25-80 9.8 -3.1
SIX:'0827-wells 6
l
~--- --
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND - GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft} MEASUREMENT WATER (ft} ELEVATION ( ft} 05S/12W-01Ell U-05.Fl 6.7 06-25-80 9.9 -3.2
05S/12W-01G01 . U-05. F1 8.0 06-06-61 47.8 -39.8
05S/12W-01G02 U-05.Fl 6.3 03-28-79 11.4 -5.1
05S/12W-01G03 U-05.Fl 6.3 03-28-79 19.8 -13.5
05S/12W-01L01 U-05.Fl 6.1 11-01-61 55.7 -49.6
05S/12W-01M01 U-05.A5 6.5 11-16-78 9.1 -2.6
05S/12W-01M02 U-05.A5 10.5 03-72-79 10.7 -0.2
05S/12W-01M03 U-05.A5 6.5 03-22-79 7.2 -0.7
05S/12W-01M04 U-05.Fl 6.1 06-25-80 19.7 -13.6
05S/12W-01M05 U-05. F1 6.1 06-25-80 10~6 -4.5
05S/12W-01M06 U-05. F1 6.1 ~06-25-80 10.9 -4.8
05S/12W-01N01 U-05.A5 13.2 03~22-79 19.0 -5.0
05S/12W-01N02 U-05.A5 13.2 03-22-79 18.7 -5.5
05S/12W-01N03 U-05.A5 13.6 03-22-79 19.0 -5.4
05S/12W~01N04 U-05.A5 13.6 03-22-79 20.6 -7.0
05S/12W-01N05 U-05.A5 13.6 03-22-79 19.7 -6.1
05S/12W-02A01 U-05.A5 11.3 11-16-42 8.6 2.7
SIX:0827-wells 7
·~
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION ( ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft} ELEVATION (ft} 05S/12W-02A02 U-05.A5 8.6 11-19-58 DRY
05S/12W-02A04 U-05.A5 21.0 06-30-66 33.2 ·-12.2
05S/12W-02A05 U-05.A5 20.9 06-25-80 21.9 -1.0
05S/12W-02A09 U-05.A5 8.0 06-25-80 6.4 1.6
05S/12W-02A10 U-05.A5 8.0 06-25-80 6.3 1.7
05S/12W-02All U-05.A5 8.0 06-25-80 10.2 -2.2
05S/12W-02A12 U-05.A5 8.0 06-25-80 23.0 -15.0
05S/12W-02A13 U-05.A5 11.1 06-25-80 3.8 7.3
05S/12W-02A14 U-05.A5 11.1 06-25-80 5.2 5.9
05S/12W-02A15 U-05.A5 11.1 06-25-80 10.5 0.6
05S/12W-02A16 U-05.A5 11.1 06-25-80 25.5 -14.4
05S/12W-02A19 U-05.A5 20.9 11-28-78 24.8 -4.0
· 05S/12W-02A20 U-05.A5 20.9 01-23-79 22.5 -1.6
05S/12W-02A21 U-05.A5 20.9 12-12-78 25.3 -4.4
05S/12W-02B01 U-05.A5 11.5 05-01-79 13.2 -1.7
05S/12W-02B02 U-05.A5 8.0 11-16-51 24.6 16.6
05S/12W-02B04 U-05.A5 8.0 01-30-32 3.8 4.2
SIX:0827-wells 8
~- ·,,
c~
I
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
. GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION ( ft) MEASUREMENT WATER {ft} ELEVATION {ft} 05S/12W-02B05 U-05.A5 8.5 02-26-65 25.6 -17.1
05S/12W-02B06 U-05.A5 8.0 09-26-58 65.3 -57.3
05S/12W-02B07 U-05.A5 10.0 12-12-60 10.8 -0.8
05S/12W-02B08 U-05.A5 9.0 12-11-78 43.9 -34.9
05S/12W-02B09 U-05.A5 9.0 04-15-79 6.5 2.5
05S/12W-02B10 U-05.A5 8.0 05-14-54 16.4 -8.4
05S/12W-02Bll U-05.A5 10.0 08-13-51 20.4 -10.4
05S/12W-02B12 U-05.A5 9.0 04-15-79 2.8 6.2
05S/12W-02B13 U-05.A5 8.8 06-24-86 18.9 -10.1
05S/12W-02B14 U-05.A5 10.4 06-25-80 9.1 1.3
05S/12W-02B15 U-05.A5 10.4 06-25-80 21.1 -10.7
05S/12W-02B16 U-05.A5 10.8 06-24-80 9.2 1.6
05S/12W-02B17 U-05.A5 10.8 06-24-80 14.4 -3.6
05S/12W-02B20 U-05.A5 10.0 03-13-79 -2.8 12.8
05S/12W-02821 U-05.A5 10.0 06-24-80 9.8 0.2
05S/12W-02B22 U-05.A5 10.0 03-29-79 5.2 4.8
05S/12W-02B23 U-05.A5 10.0 03-29-79 6.6 3.4
SIX:0827-wells 9
/'-)
..... _/, '----- /
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft) ELEVATION (ft) 05S/12W-02824 U-05.A5 10.0 03-29-79 8.4 1.6
05S/12W-02825 U-05.A5 11.0 04-26-73 15.8 -4~8
oss;12w.:.o2co1 U-05.A5 25.2 04-16-79 18.2 7.0
05S/12W-02C04 U-05.A1 14.0 11-06-59 35.2 -21.2
05S/12W-02C05 U-05.A5 26.2 10-14-60 71.8 -45.6
05S/12W-02C06 U-05.A5 18.0 06-24-80 16.6 1.4
05S/12W-02C07 U-05.A5 18.0 ' 06-24-80 12.8 5.2
05S/12W-02C08 U-05.A5 16.0 06-24-80 14.8 1.2
05S/12W-02C09 U-05.A5 16.0 06-24-80 . 11.2 4.8
05S/12W-02D01 U-05.A5 25.0 09-14-59 DRY
05S/12W-02D02 U-05.A5 13.0 11-06-59 63.0 -50.0
05S/12W-02003 U-05.A5 23.0 10-12-59 53.5 -30.5
05S/12W-02004 U-05.A5 15.0 06-24-80 14.2 0.8
05S/12W-02005 U-05.A5 15.0 06-24-80 11.9 3.1
05S/12W-02006 U-05.A5 15.0 06-24-80 18.1 -3.1
05S/12W-02E03 U-05.A5 9.2 03-20-79 4.1 5.1
05S/12W-02E04 U-05.A5 9.2 03-20-79 10.1 -0.9
SIX:0827-wells 10
~~
-_/ --~/
TABLE F-1 {Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft} ELEVATION (ft} 05S/12W-02F01 U-05.A5 8.1 11-15-74 5.6 2.5
05S/12W-02F02 U-05.A5 8.4 03-15-55 DRY
05S/12W-02F03 U-05.A5 8.0 04-19-66 17.3 -9.3
05S/12W-02F04 U-05.A5 9.0 11-15-78 26.5 -17.5
05S/12W-02F05 U-05.A5 6.0 05~04-54 DRY
05S/12W-02F07 U-05.A5 9.0 05-14-54 DRY
05S/12W-02F08 U-05.A5 9.0 05-14-54 DRY
05S/12W-02F09 U-05.A5 8.0 12-19-52 DRY
05S/12W-02Fl0 U-05.A5 5.0 04-24-56 12.1 -7.1
05S/ 12W-02 F11 U-05.A5 8.0 09-27-66 19.6 -11.6
05S/12W-02F.l2 U-05.A5 9.5 01-27-66 17.3 -7.8
05S/12W-02F12 U-05.A5 9.5 09-27-66 19.2 -9.7
05S/12W-02Fl3 U-05.A5 10.0 04-16-79 12.2 -2.2
05S/12W-02Fl6 U-05.A5 8.1 06-25-80 13.9 -5.8
05S/12W-02F17 U-05.A5 8.0 04-17-79 12.0 -4.0
05S/12W-02G03 U-05.A5 36.8 12-02-59 30.4 6.4
05S/12W-02G04 U-05.A5 8.0 03-30-79 12.6 -4.6
SIX:0827-wells 11
~)
-.._____/ /
TABLE F-1 {Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft) ELEVATION ( ft) 05S/12W-02G05 U-05.A5 9.0 06-24-80 22.4 --13.4
·o5S/12W-02G06 U-05.A5 9.0 04-29-70 16.1 -7.1
05S/12W-02G07 . U-05.A5 9.7 11-15-74 7.1 2.6
05S/12W-02G08 U-05.A5 10.1 11-09-65 18.7 -8.6
05S/12W-02G09 U-05.A5 10.0 03-04-60 30.0 -20.0
05S/12W-02G10 U-05.A5 9.2 11-02-65 17.9 -8.7
05S/12W-02Gll U-05.A5 10.2 11-09-65 18.1 -7.9
05S/12W-02G12 U-05.A5 11.0 03-04-60 32.9 -21.9
05S/12W-02Gl3 U-05.A5 9.9 03-15-55 DRY
05S/12W-02Gl4 U-05.A5 9.9 06-25-80 14·.8 -4.9
05S/12W-02G20 U-05.A5 11.6 06-25-80 20.3 -8.7
05S/12W-02H02 U-05.A5 6.7 10-22-54 40.2 -33.5
05S/12W-02H03 U-05.A5 8.0 02-01-55 DRY
05S/12W-02H04 u~o5.A5 10.8 02-19-60 33.0 -22.2
05S/12W-02H05 U-05.A5 10.6 03-24-60 DRY
05S/12W-02H08 U-05.A5 19.9 06-25-80 23.9 -4.0
05S/12W-02H09 U-05.A5 19.9 04-23-79 19.0 0.9
SIX: 0827 -wells 12
I
\ "-__J
[)
TABLE F-1 {Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft) ELEVATION (ft) 05S/12W-02H10 U-05.A5 19.4 04-17-79 13.9 5.5
05S/12W-02Hll . U-05.A5 19.2 06-24-80 25.1 -5.9
05S/12W-02H15 U-05.A5 21.0 06-25-80 20.2 0.8
05S/12W-02H16 U-05.A5 21.0 06-25-80 35.0 -14.0
05S/12W-02J01 U-05.A5 7.2 01-04-62 DRY
05S/12W-02J02 U-05.A5 w·.o 05-01-86 35.2 -25.2
05S/12W.,.02J03 U-05.A5 6.0 04-20-70 15.4 -9.4
05S/12W-02J04 ·u-os.As 7.4 05-03-79 18.2 -10.8
05S/12W-02J05 U-05.A5 18.5 12-11-78 28.3 -9.8
05S/12W-02K01 U-05.A5 4.3 05-20-52 7.6 -3.3
05S/12W-02K04 U-05.A5 12.5 . 01-15-78 18.0 -5.5
05S/12W-02K05 U-05.A5 12.5 11-15-78 20.3 -7.8
05S/12W-02L01 U-05.A5 5.9 11-06-75 4.1 1.8
05S/12W-02M01 U-05.A5 8.2 12-08-78 36.7 -28.5
05S/12W-02N02 U-05.A5 4.9 12-11-78 4.5 0.4
05S/12W-02N03 U-05.A5 2.0 12-11-78 2.1 -0.1
05S/12W-02N04 U-05.A5 9.2 04-24-73 12.5 -3.3
SIX:0827-wells 13
"~---' .
., /
-;
~<-'
,, ____ ,
.
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft} ELEVATION (ft} 05S/12W-02P01 U-05.A5 4.8 12-11-78 32.0 -27.2
05S/12W-02P02 . U-05.A5 6.0 06-10-63 27..4 -21.4
05S/12W-02P04 U-05.A5 4.2 04-15-59 9.1 -4.9
05S/12W-02POq U-05.A5 5.0 04-13-78 3.8 1.2
05S/12W-02P06 U-05.A5 6.2 11-01-61 57.2 -51.0
05S/12W-02P07 U-05.A5 4.2 12-11-78 26.8 -22.6
05S/12W-02P11 U-05.A5 3.0 06-24-80 4.0 -1.0
05S/12W-02P12 U-05.A5 3.7 04-17-79 3.2 0.5
05S/12W-02Q01 U-05.A5 5.2 06-25-80 8.7 -3.5
05S/12W-02R01 U-05.A5 17.9 06-24-80 28.1 -10.2
05S/12W .. 02R02 U-05.A5 17.9 06-25-80 25.2 -7.3
05S/12W-02R03 U-05.A5 18.0 01-20-65 32.3 -14.3
05S/12W-03A01 U-05.A5 18.0 11-07-75 24.0 -6.0
05S/12W-03B02 U-05.A5 51.0 03-20-79 34.5 16.5
05S/12W-:-03B03 U-05.A5 51.0 03-20-79 41.9 9.1
05S/12W-03C01 U-05.A5 8.7 12-23-76 26.0 -17.3
05S/12W-03F01 U-05.A2 8.0 12-08-78 60.5 -52.5
SIX:0827-wells 14
\ '~/
)
'''-----·""
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STATE HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION ( ft) MEASUREMENT WATER (ft) ELEVATION ( ft) 05S/12W-03F02 U-05.A2 8.0 05-02-78 6.3 1.7
05S/12W-03H01 U-05.A5 15.7 05-02-78 21.8 -6~1
05S/12W-03H02 U-05.A5 15.7 05-02-78 20.2 -4.5
05S/12W-03H03 U-05.A5 15.7 05-02-78 17.3 -1.6
05S/12W-03J01 U-05.A2 5.2 12-08-78 55.7 -50.5
05S/12W-10A01 U-05.A2 7.9 03-03-61 43.7 -35.8
05S/12W-10H02 U-05.A2 5.8 04-15-59 6.8 -1.0
05S/ 12W-10H02 U-05.A2 6.4 04-15-59 2.8 3.6 .
05S/12W-10K01 U-05.A2 6.7 02-01-55 7.6 -0.9
05S/12W-10P01 U-05.A2 5.0 05-02-86 3.5 1.5
05S/12W-11A01 U-05.A5 6.0 04-03-63 29.5 -23. 5.
05S/12W-11C02 U-05.A5 . 5.6 10-25-73 33.8 -28.2
05S/12W-11D01 U-05.A5 2.7 03-26-63 1.1 1.6
05S/12W-11G01 U-05.A5 4.4 12-08-78 8.2 -3.8
05S/12W-11G02 U-05.A5 5.7 12-08-78 34.7 -29.0
05S/12W-11G03 U-05.A5 6.0 12-08-78 28.9 -22.9
05S/12W-11G04 U-05.A5 5.0 06-24-80 7.7 -2.7
SIX:0827-wells 15
--)
',__/ '·-._./
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
GROUND GROUND WATER
STAT~ HYDROLOGIC SURFACE DATE OF SURFACE TO SURFACE
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION* ELEVATION (ft) · MEASUREMENT WATER (ft) ELEVATION (ft) 05S/12W-11G05 U-05.A2 16.8 12-08-78 42.7 -25.9
05S/ 12W-11G06 U-05.A2 16.7 12-08-78 60.8 -44.1
05S/12W-11H01 U-05. F1 5.9 10-03-44 11.3 -5.4
05S/12W-11H02 U-05.Fl 7.4 11-17-78 14.3 -6.9
05S/12W-11J02 U-05.Fl .6. 7 12-08-78 32.7 -26.0
05S/12W-11J03 U-05. F1 6.8 05-10-76 5.0 1.8
05S/12W-11N01 U-05. F1 0.5 05-23-44 0.5 0.0
05S/12W-11P01 Y -Ol.A1 14.2 12-08-78 44.6 30.4
05S/12W-12A01 Y -Ol.A1 7.7 06-14-34 6 •. 2 1.5
05S/12W-12A02 Y -Ol.A1 7.0 04-15-55 38.4 -31.4
05S/12W:_12C01 U-05. F1 17.0 11-04-82 21.3 -14.0
05S/12W-12C02 U-05.Fl 6.6 12-08-78 16.8 -10.2
05S/12W-12C03 U-05.Fl 7.0 03-23-79 12.6 -5.6
05S/12W-12C04 U-05. F1 7.0 03-23-79 11.7 -4.7
05S/12W-12C05 U-05. F1 7.0 . 03-23-79 17 .3· -10.3
05S/12W-12D01 U-05.A5 7.3 11-.17-78 16.8 -9.5
05S/12W-12002 U-05.Fl 7.3 11-17-78 16.8 -9.5
SIX:0827-wells 16
'~
TABLE F-1 (Continued)
STATE HYDROLOGIC
WELL NUMBER AREAL DESIGNATION*
05S/12W-12F02 U-05.Fl
05S/12W-12L01 Y-Ol.Al
05S/12W-12M01 U-05.Fl
05S/12W-12M02 U-05.Fl
05S/12W-12N01 U-05.Fl
05S/12W-12Q01 Y -Ol.A1
05S/12W-14B01 U-05.Fl
*NOTE: Hydrologic Areal Designation Code
U-05.A5 Hydrologic Basin (HB)
U-05.A5 Hydrologic Unit (HU)
U-05.A5 Hydrologic Area (HA}
U-05.A5 Hydrologic Subarea (HSA),
GROUND
SURFACE DATE OF
ELEVATION {ft) MEASUREMENT
6.5 11-10-67
26.0 08-27-35
39.2 12-08-78
39.0 12-08-78
18.0 12-05-44
16.5 03-09-62
5.0 06-02-31
GROUND
SURFACE TO
WATER {ft)
28.2 29.6
73.1 50.1
41.3 32.7
18.7 U-05.A1 Los Angel~s HB, LA-San Gabriel River HU, Coastal Plain HA, Palos Verdes HSA U-05.A2 Los Angeles HB, LA-San Gabriel River HU, Coastal Plain HA, West Coast HSA U-05.A5 Los Angeles HB, LA-San Gabriel River HU, Coastal Plain HA, Central HSA U-05.F1 Los Angeles HB, LA-San Gabriel River HU, Anaheim HA, Buena Park HSA ~'
WATER
SURFACE
ELEVATION {ft)
-21.7
-3.6
-33.9
-11.1
-23.3
-16.2
-13.7
Y-01.A1 Santa Ana HB, Santa Ana River HU, Lower Santa Ana River HA, East Coastal Plain HSA SIX:0827-wells 17
APPENDIX G
DATA ON OIL AND GAS WELLS
IN THE VICINITY OF THE SITE
-/ ' (
)
1,L!AS! NAME AND NU,..II!It CCM~l.!T!D
CART S!C l.O~E'RATCit D!~TH
OAT LOC TW~ •Nc l,Ajaf.t' !LEY DATA LOCS
27 •• 12W 34 IIXIY 3 •I !
CONTINENTAL OIL 10,035
06•03'7•0IW'71 •00
27 .. 12W 3< II XI 'I' 3 •2
CONTINENTAL OIL ~.1'73
H o.a .. o:S7•0it'72·oo
27 u 12W 34 1111 YAN T 3 • I
SHELL t 0, 1 I I
H o.a·Ol7·0I&71•oo
27 4S 12W 34 llltY&..HT 3 •2
SH!LL '. "2 H OC•03'7•0I&Il•OO 1101'
27 4S 12W 34 RfCR!.C.TlDfri 'AJI.K •I I!
HlJtiELL OIL !XItLD •• l11
H 04·03'7·01111•00 311(1
27 .. 12W 3< ~I!CR.!~TION fi'A"-K •2 IE
H!RI!LL 0 l L !X~LO I, II 7
H OI•Ol7•01tiO•Ot liKI
27 4S 12W 34 .!CREATION PlAit I( •2 I!
HUI!LL OIL !.,LO 1,720
H 0&•03'7•01111•00 31KI
27 4S 12W 34 HCR!ATION PI ARK •• I!
HI!RB!LL OIL EXHO 1,030 COl~
H 0&•037•01112•00 liKI
I 3 I 4S • 1 :w 34 llt!Cit!ATION 'A"K ... 01/21/71 DATA H!RI!LL OIL •••• l HUT
H 0&·037•13121•01 21CL
131 27 4S 12W 34 .!Cit!ATION ftAIIIK •s DATA I!
H"!RBI!LL 0 I L !X~LO 7,110
Ot•Ol7• ,3121•01-
131 4S 12W 34 IHCREATIDH 'ARK •• 10/07/71 DATA
370 H!OSELL OIL 1,011 HUT
H 01•037·22011•00 2TCL
131 27 4$ 12W 34 .!CR!AT I ON '4"-k ., 11/21/71 DATA DILL ~-
)
H!OI!LL OIL a, •o' HilT
H o•·o~7·220I7•01 21~L
3 4$ 12W 34 u• ·~~~c O&TA 0 ILL
CHA"4~L IN 'ET~O 2,770 HIST
o•·o:J7·o•ta,•ot 23CL
27 4$ 12W 31 llXIY UUST .. , !
T!XACO ... ,.
o•·ol7·0&Si1·oo IOCL
27 OS 12W H S I Kill' RAHCH HCT • I
T!XACO 11.77'
H_ O.e•OII·~07111•00 tCL
.--------
( )
\. )
1 .~!AS! HAM! AND NUMI!R CDMP~!T!D 1 .~!AS~ HAM! A"D HUMI!It CDMP~!T!D SEC 2. QP!ItATO-. O!PTM CART SfC 2. OP!RATOit O!PTH CAAT OAT I.OC TW,. ltNC l,APII IH!V DATA I.DCS OAT ~OC TW,. RNG l.API• !LEV DATA ~OCS 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
CS t&W Ol CARSON •11
DOM1NOU!Z PROP!ItTI!S
0&•037•11114•00
4S 1&W 01 CAitSOH •24
DDMINCUEZ ,.O,ERTIES
0&•037•11121•00
4S !&W 01 D!L AMO W47
O!L AMD !N!ItCY
0& •037•, 313•·00
&S 14W 01 DEL Afl40 A Ill
D!L Afl40 !NI!JtCY
0&•037•22715•00
4S 1&W 01 D!L AMO A •21
D!L AMO !N!IIlCY
04•031•22127·00
41 t•W 01 DEL .&MO I lf3
DEL AND !NIItCY
04•037•22111•00
&S 14W 01 DEL AMO J •7
DEL AND EN!OCY
04•037•221 15•00
CS I&W 01 DEL AMO I •14
DEL AND ENEitCY
0&·037•22101•00
&S 1CW 01 CI!L Afl40 I 11'21
DEL AND ENE~CY
_04•037·22711•00
&S 1&W 01 TORRANCE •&4
SANTA ~! ENI!.GY
0&•0:17•11101•00
as ,,..., ts T •zoa
SANTA ~! ENUGY
04•0!17•23301•00
4S 14W II T M210
SANTA ~E !NUCY
04•037-23&31•00
DATA
3,Ut HIST
OAT&
3,340 HIST
Ol/00/11 DATA
. 3, 600 HJST
01/01/U DATA
4, 2t1 HUT
ISCL
03/21/1'7 DATA
4,371 HilT
DATA
4,stl HIST
07/22/11 DATA
3,120 HUT
IIGL
DATA
HIST
12/31/12. DATA
I,Oil HilT
IIGL
DATA
372 HIST
12/24/11 DATA
4,330 HIST
tOGL
01/23/11 DATA
4,130 HUT
t&CL
2 2
2 2
2 2
41 14W 23 COMMUNITY •1
J NUC!NT OIL
o•·o37·17alo·oo
&S H&W 24 DI!WITT •1
A It CO
0&•037•17101•00
&$ I&W 24 UNKNOWN II 1
LAS ~LOO!I DEY!L
0&•037·00000•00
4S 14W 21 MAHAit 111
N NILL!It
04•037• 1'7011•00
•a I&W 21 SOUTH TOJtJtANC! U •tJt
MD aiL
0&•03'7•11117•0:1
IS 11W 21 HDLaltOOK IS.!LL •3•1
OIL WI!LL SEitY
0&•011•07&17•00
5S 1 1W 33 SOUTH 80LSA •13A
SHELL
04•011•02113•00
IS IIW 33 SOUTH &CLSA S W73A
SHI!LL
04•019 •02171•00
IS 11W 33 SOUTH IOLSA S lft2•1
SHI!LL
04•019•02111•01
DATA
3,711 HIST
DATA
3.110 HlST
DATA
HlST
Ot/21/1'7 DATA
1,211 HliT
DATA
I, 1tl HlST
4,717
4.113
5. 14,
ICL
DATA
HIST
II 11W 33 STATI! ,ltC 421 •4117A 04/12/71 DATA
AN! NOH 10, 7t0
04•219•0]241•01
IS 11W 33 STATI ~lltC &21 lf&127A 11/02/74 DATA
AMI NO I .L 1 1 , 207
04•219•03211•01
SS 11W 33 STATI PAC &21 •&131A 09/00/'1 DATA
AMINOIL 11,3&1
04•219•03211•01
AC:MT
AC:MT
----~----~.~~--~1~4~W~1~~~~T----------------~.~2~1~1~------------------~L~A~T~ ~2----------~~~~--~1~1~W~3~3--~S~T~A·T~E~~-It~C~&~2~1~--~.-4~1:3:3~A--------~--.D~A·T~A~---- 2 2
2 2
2 2
2 2
S&NTA ~! !NEOCY I ,1)9 ~D ANINDIL
04•037•23441•00 t4GL. COli' 04•219•03217•01
CD I~
4S 14W 11 T 11'212
SANTA ~! IN!.GY
04•037•2l4U•OO
&S 14W 11 TORRANCE 11'41.
SANTA ~~ !N!ItCY
o•·o:l7•t7Zit·oo
&S 14W II TORRANCE 11'15
SANTA ~I! ENERGY
04•037•172&1•00
4S 14W 15 TOIItllt.ANC! •t7
SAN.T A ~! INEitGY
04•037•1'7217-00
&S 14W II TOitltANCE •:ZOO
SANTA ~E I!NIItCY
0••037•22177•01
&S 14W 11 TU 11'4'7
SANTA ~! EN!.GY
o•·o:n· 1 1171•03
&s taw t& Tu trt27
SANTA- ~~ !N!ItGY
04"037•23372•00
4$ 1&W 11 TU •36&~
SANTA ~~ ENEitGY
04•037•21&31•01
&S 1&W 11 TU •411
SANTA ~~ EN!ItGY
04•037•23410•00
4S 14W 11 TU Mil' IIIIW
SANTA ~E lNEOCY
"0&•037•22&04•00
&S ,1&W ,, DEL AMO WI
DEL AMC I!NI!JtCY
0&•037•17410•00
4$ 14W 11 DEL Afl40 trtl
DEL Afi4Q !N!IIlCY
o•·037·t7&Jo·oo
MCAL 2
I!
02/12/11 DATA
4,102 HUT
IOC.L
DATA
HIST
10/U/14 DATA
4,.,oo HlST
I:ZGL
OTH.
DTH.
03/23/17 DATA LAT
&,240 HIST
I:ZGL
12/31/11 DATA
3,710 HilT
IICL
4, 171
t4CL
09/20/ .. DATA
4,014 HIST
aiCL
04/07/17 DATA LAT
4,14t HIST CI!MT
tOGL
10/10/14 DATA
3,112 HIST
II~L
11/11/1$ DATA
4,000 HIST
71CL
DATA
HIST
2 2
2 2
2 2
IS
IS
11W 34 IDLSA •10
CH!Y.DN USA
O&•OSI•0:1232·00
1 2W 03 ! I T • 10
D !LLIOT .1•
04 • 03'7 • 2:na 1 • oo
IS 1 2W 0:1 I I T rt 1 1
Q. 1L. LID T .lit
04•0!J7•22112•00
IS 1 2W 03 I! I T •1 2
D ELL.IOT .Jit
04•037•22113•00
IS 1 :ZW 03 ! I T • 14
D ELLIOT J~
0&•037•23011-00
IS 1 2W 03 ! I T II 1 I
0 ELLIOT .1•
04•037•23011•00
IS 1 :ZW Ol E I T •1 I
D EL.LIDT ollt
oi·o:r'7•23o&7-oo
IS 12W 03 I! I T II' 17
D ELLIOT ollt
04•03'7•23011•00
IS 12W 07 A 11'l01
THUMS LONG lEACH
04•237·20343•00
IS 12W 01 A •3SI
THUNS LDNC .EACH
04•23'7·20130•00
II 121111 07 A •314
THUMS LDN~ •EACH
04•23'7•22St1•00
IS 1 2W 0'7 A. 11'130
THUJIIIS LCMC 8!&eH
04•23'7•23322•00
IS 12W 07 A •170
THUNS LDNC •EACH
o• .. 23'7 .. 2ooa2 ··o t
11.711
01/31/11 DATA
4,132 HlST
03/31/1& DATA
1,210 HlST
SCL
05/0I/14 DATA
a,ooo HIST
ICL
Ol/10/1& DATA
l,lil4 HIST
ICL
11/11/la DATA
1,000 HIST
ICL
10/10/1& DATA
I, 1&0 HIST
ICL
11/11/ .. DATA
1,000 HIST
.1cL
02/0I/11 DATA
1,111 HIST
ICL co•r
12/01/11 DATA
I, 171 HIST
11GL
11/11'/11 DATA
• .. on HlST
IICL
07/05/11 DATA
4,707 HIST
11GL
01/01/17 DATA
&,711 HIST
11CL
12/11/U DATA
3,011 HIST
11CL
1 .LEASE NA~! AND NUMB!~ COM~L!T!D
CA•T S!C 2.0~!~ATO. O!~TH
CAT LQC TW~ lllNC J.AIII,. !L!Y DATA LCC$
,.
H
1 '.a 3.
174
174 J'
JSoo
H
,,, 31
IO
''" l'
17C: ll
,,, Jl
lOO
175 H
17& 36
175 li
17&36
110
H
175 :u
175 ll
H
17536
175 li
M
175 36
115 31
175 31
900
H
175 ~'
175 ll
H
1715 :II
175 30
175 30
5$ 12W 01 I~YA! 1 T -3
SHI!LL
o&•o:J7·07tt2·00
IS 12W 01 SRYANT !STAT! NC WI
T!XACO
04·0:11·01110·00
5$ 12W C2 llXIY A -1
CDNTINI!NTAL OIL
o•·o37·0II73•00
IS 12W 02 BJXIY 4 *"
CDNTJH!NTAL OIL
04•037•01977·01
SS 12~ 02 BIXBY A -1~
CDHTJN!HTAL DlL
o• .. 037•0itli•OO
SS 12W 02 BIXBY A •2&
CDNTIH!HTAL OIL
o&•O:l1•06tl7·oo
SS 12W 02 SIXIY A W21
CONTIJ.i!HTAL OIL
04·0~7·07001•00
SS I:ZW 02 SIXISY A 11'30
CCNTIH!NTAL OIL
0&•037•07Co0l .. OO
IS 12W 02 IIXIY A •40
CONOCO
0&·0~7·0701:::1•00
IS 12W Ol IIXIY A W41
CONTINENTAL OIL
o•·o:l7·0'7o1a·oo
bS 12W 02 eiK!Y • •41
CONTINENTAL OIL
04-0J-'7•07011•00
5S 12W O:Z IIXIY A •47
C:CNCCO
04•037•07020•00
5S 12W O:l BIXBY & ._41
CONTINENTAL OIL
o4•o:I7·0'702:Z·OO
5$ 12W 02 BlXIY A •&O
C:CNTJN!NTA!. OIL
04•0l"T•070:Zl•OO
55 12\llf 02 BIXBY A •SI
CONTINENTAL OIL
04 .. 037·07C2•·00
55 12W 02 llXISY A 111'12
CO~TIN!NTAL OIL
o•·oJ7-o7o:zs-oo
55 12W 02 IIXIY A •SJ
CONTINENTAL OIL
04•037•01311•00
IS 12W 02 IIXIY A •••
CONTIHENTAL OIL
04.·0~7·07121•00
SS I:ZW 02 BIXIY A •SI
CONTINENTAL OIL
04·0~7·07127•00
5$ 12W 02 llXIY A •&I
CONTINENTAL OIL
04•03'!•07121•00
IS 12W 02 IIXIY' A 1'17
CONTINENTAL OIL
04•03'7•07121•00
IS 12W 02 IIXIY A •51
CONTINENTAL OIL
0&•0:17•07130•00
SS l:ZW O:Z BIXBY A •st
CONTINENTAL OIL
04•0.l'T·071l1•00
SS 12W 02 IIXIY A ••o
C:ONTIN!NTAL OIL
04•0.l7•0713:Z•OO
OATI.r.
7, 221 HIS T
1501'
05/1&/51 Ct.TA I!
1 1 • 7 I 1 HIS T
IC:L SM~L
COlt I!
OS/ 1t /:!1 DATA
1,4&1 HIST
1001'
05/23/27 DATA I!
S,&22 MIST r:tA
ICL. COlt!
0&/10/27 DATA
1,130 HIST
"POll" COlt!
12/21/21 DATA !
&,010 HIST RA
90>
01/15/21 DATA !
1,571 HIST
tO>
11/30/21 DATA I!
1,041 HJST I!
tO>
12/01/12 DATA II!
7,030 MIST E
1001' DATA JtA
Ml&T
02/11/41 DATA I
4, 123. HIST kA
04/::ZI/&1 DATA !
1,&11 H!ST
07/08/ll DATA E
1,101 Jo~IST
•CL DATA
HIST
015/10/45 DATA I!
a,•u MIST
07/11/4.5 DATA I!
I ,491 HIST
Ot/13/t& DATA E
1,470 HIST
SP.t' L
12/0./45 DATA !
1,.&1 HIST
03/0./46 DATA E
a,•o• H!ST OTH~
01/UI'I OATA E
1, .. 0 HIST OTH~
07/20/'0 DATA 1!
1,000 HIST I
0&/10/47 O.C.lA !
1,120HlST
tiKI SM'L
03/11/U DATA
I, 911 HIST
ICL SM'L ,.;
05/25/41 DATA
&,3~1 HlST
SM'l.
10/19/U OATA IE
I, t07 HIST !
SM~ L Q-
12/0l/41 DATA I!
1,770 HIST !
SCL S"'411'L. Cit
•a
u
1 .L.!AS! NAME ANO NUMI!~ CO~II'L!T!O
CAIItT S!C 2. O~!JtATOIIl O!"TH
OAT LOC: TW,. ~HC l,A,.I• !l.!'f O.t'rA t.OCS
175 l&
1220
H
1 7 I l I
171 31
H
171 l'
H
171 li
H
175 H
175 li
1540
H
1 7 I l I.
175 H
H
IS 12W 02.11XIY A IPII
CDHTIN!NT&L OIL
O& .. Ol7·0713l·OO
5S 12W 02 IJXIY A IPI2
CONTIN!NT&L OIL
04•0l"1•0713&•00
IS 12W 02 llXIY A •17
CONTtNI!~TAL OIL
04•0l7•071lt•OO
IS 12W 02 IIXIY A •&t
CO~TlNI!NTAL OJL
04•037•0'7141•00
SS 12W 02 IJXI'r A 1170
CONT1N!NTAL DJL
oa·o::S'T·o7t42~oo
IS 12W 02 IIXIY A ,7:1
CONTINI!NTAL OIL
04·037·01101•00
IS 12W 02 BIXIY A 1174
CONTIN!NTAL OIL
04•037•07141•00
IS 12W 02 IIXBY A •71
CONTINENTAL OIL
04•037·07 ltii•OO
IS 12~ O:Z IIXIV A IP77
CONTINENTAL OIL
O&•Ol7•07141•00
175 ll II 12W 02 IIXIY A •7t
li'O CONTINENTAL OIL
H 0&•037•07110•00
171 Jl
M
171 ~·
171
H
171 3&
H
175 3&
1110
H
1711j 31
171
175
171
%1 10
IS 12W 02 llXIY A •11
CONTINENTAL OIL
04·0::S7•07tl1•00
IS 12W 02 IIICIY A •12
CDNOCO
04•037•20.11•00
II t2W O:Z JRY4NT -1
UNION OIL 0, CA~I,
04•0l'T•OIII4•00
IS 12W O:Z llllYANT •t
SH!Ll
04·027•0'7111•00
IS 12W 02 SAN CAIIIli~L 11'33
C:H!YJtON USA
04·0l'7•01501•00
IS 12W 02 SAN CA8RII!L ··~
CH!VJtON USA
04·037•00121·00
SS 12W O:Z T •102
LONG 8EACH OIL
o•·237·02tl2•01
IS 12W 03 M1
OOHE CLUNE
5$ 12W 0~ M1
I!! J.H, ACIH4.1
04•037•07tli•OO
55 .,12W Ol •t
C C ~ITH!IItS
o•·OJ7•0119S•OO
SS 12W 0~ •1
J C WH!!I.!Jt
04•037·0&91t•OO
55 I 2W 0.1 •1
MOIIL
04·0~T·07t&S•OO
SS 12W 03 11
0&•037•07171•00
S$ 12W Ol *1
T CAI:tNeY
o•·Ol7·0&ti .... OO
IO/:Z4/41 OATA !
I, Ill MIST
&CL S""II'L
02/21/12 CATA l
t2,1C2MIST
11 C L
12/1'7/&1 D~'r.ol I
1,111 HilT ca;
I CiL II
01/23/17 OAT& ll
I, 110 HilT I
IQL
01/00/12 OAT& f
I', 710 HilT
7QL
02/24/11 OATA !(,
1,112 HIST!
1c L ~o~re
C!NT
04/23/'1 DATA Jl
1,100 HtST [
7CL
01/23/1 I CAT .C. II
t,10IHJSTI"
ICL
12/lO/Il,QATA If
1,0!2 HUT I
IQL
Ol/11/12 DATA II
A, 2CS H!ST I
&QL
0,/21/11 CA..,.I Jf
~,12JHISTI
13GL CTII
07/01/lt OATA fl.
11, ItO HIST I
10CL DATA A~ crll
01/2t/21 DATA
MIST
1 oa' cou
11./12/45 DATI
l,lt'T HJST
cau
11/01/&1 QATI
1,310 ~1ST
1701"
01/0::Z/50 QAT.&
1,473 HIST
ttDF
O:::l/01/78 CAT.&
~.011
o•T'
1,111 HJST
UD, ..........-"'
OS/12/27 DATA
1,~71 H15T
5001'
05/12/27 DATA
5,355 MIST
COR!
OATA
4,100 HIST
320,
OATA
l,&tl HlST
Ot.TA
2, I 00
0'/22/27 CATA
4, tfS MIST
400P'
)
I .LrASf NAM! AHO HUM~tR COM,L[TtD
C A~ T
l.O'E~ATOII oerTH
OAT LDC TW1' IIHC :J,API' !l!Y DATA lOCS
= ,,.
,.
"'
175 l'
175
175
175
1410
"
171
1TI
171
17S
171
171 ll
'" 2Ho
M
171
"'
171
175
"
175
55 55
55 55
ss
55 12W OJ -I
12W Ol
12W Ol
I 21"111 o l
12W Ol
12W OJ
~!ST~RN OIL I •E'
06•03"7·01117•00
• I
wHIT! !ACL! ~!TAO
0&•03'1·01ttl•OO
DILL I COMSTOCK
04·03"7·07111•00
..
DOMINCUI% !XT!NSIDN
OC•03"7•0716t·OO
DOW CH!MlC:AL
04•03"7·0"71"70•00
.,
,. A BALLIN I ' !•WtNC
0&•037·01110•00
ss 12'11f 03 4'2
55 12W 03
WHIT! !ACL! ~!TRO
04•0l'1·01tt0·00
COASTAL
04•037•01170•00
SS 12W Ol •J
ss
55 15
ss
ss
2750
ss
WHIT! IACL! ,!T~Q
O&•Ol'T·OIIt1•00
12W Ol ••
WHITI IA~LI ~~T~O
o•·oJ7·0itt2•00
12W OJ
12W OJ
1 ZW OJ
J T ~OII~TSOM CO
04•0l7•01JI'7•00
~lNG
0&·037•07114•00
OLYMPIC
04•037•071Coi•OO
#I
1ZW Ol •tl
RING
o• -o2r -011 as-oo
12W 03 AHC BRYANT 2 3
SHILL
04•027•01117•00
12W OJ AITKEN
T H 1o4 AITKIN
O~·OJ1•01ti1•QO
12W Ol AI. AMI TOS
H! WILLIAMS
04•037•0&114•00
• 1
SS 12W Ol ALAMITOS •t
L JUDSON I J loiC CULLAiol
04•027•07132·00
5S 1.2W 03 ALAMITOS •1
MARINA HIIGHTS LTD
o•·on·o7t41•00
5S 12W Ol ALAMITOS 1'2
WUTOIL
o•·037·olt·aa-oo
SS 12W OJ ALAMITOS fl'!! 1'1
5uP~~~c~ ott.
0&•037·~&153•00
5S 12W Ol ~I.AMITOS ~~~ w2
SUP!Jt.tOit OIL
OC·OJ7•0IS54•00
175, 3"7 SS I:ZW Ol A\.AJoiiiJTDS H!lCHTS •1
lO:JO SO SH!l.L
175 JT
I 75 J7
04·0J7•07JII•OO
55 12W 03 ALAMITOS H!lCHi$ •3
~AH W!ST!~N ,IT•D
04•0l7•21tOI•OO
55 12W 03 AI.AMITCS HElCHTS #4
PAH W!ST!RH P!TRD
04•037•21,07·01
07/01/2"7 DATA
4,113 lUST
liD'
01/0l/21 O.lTA
.. , '5 a H 1sT
270,.
05/01/21 OAT.O.
5,l"71 HilT
Ol/05/30 DATA
c,t2S HIST
SOD'
DATA ~A
!,490 MIST
21D'
DATA
2001'
07/00/21 DATA
!,24& HtST
-2 t 0,
DATA
&,liT HIST
110; COJI:.
10/21/21 OATA
l,&ll HilT
liD'
120'
DATA
HUT
0"7/15/27 DATA
l,llO HIST
110'
01/21/27 DATA
1,457 HIST
TO' CO~I
07/01/27 OAT~
HJST
IICfl'
01/20/27 DATA
S,4ll HUT
SO, CO~!
I0/25/41 DATA
1,112 HUT
20 co~•
Ot/21/27 DATA
I, 112 H!ST
250'
DATA
4,101 HlS·T
110' CCIIll
01/21/27 DATA
•.sao HilT
lO.D,
12/ "/10 DATA
5,1'2H!ST
10,
01/ U/27 DATA
S, 100 HIST
210'
00/00/'l I DATA
5,341 HIST
2 I Ofl' CO lit I!
10/00/7& DATA.
5,410 HIST
20DII' CO"!
07/06/41 DATA !
1,711 HIST
SOD' CORI
04/14/71 DATA DILL
1,192 GR
2'5 ~ L
OTHJt
06/l0/71 DATA l!
9,021 HlST
21CL
C A .Ill T
DAT I.OC TW~ ~1-tC
I 7 S l 1
17S
175
175
l230
"
171
I 71 J7
175 37
175
171
"
111
H
171
HIO
171 JT
IO
H
171
H
171 JT
171 JT
H
171 37
171 3'7
270
H
171 37
171 JT
H
171 37
171 37
H
..
55 ss
ss
ss
ss
llW OJ ALA~ITDS H!IGHTS #I
,AN W!ST!.N '!T•o
04•037•21,01•00
12W 03 AI.AMITOS H!lCHTS •I
PAN WIST~~" '!T•o
04•0l7·21tl2•00
12W OJ AL~MITOS HICMTS #7
'AN W!ST!~N ~IT•O
0 & • o J 1 .. :Z II l J • 00
12W 03 ALAMITOS LAHO CO •1
,AN W!ST!~~ 'ITRO
Ooi•03'1'•0'1'tl7•00
12~ Ol ALAMITOS LAHD :a •2
,AN W!STI~N ~RT"O
04•0::1'7•07111·00
12W OJ ALAMITOS \.AND CO 12A
~AN W!ST!•N '!T~O
04•03'7•07tii•OO
IS 12W CJ ALAMl TOS LAND CD •l
,AN W!ST!.N '!T•o
o•·o3'7·0717o·oo
IS 12W 03 AI.AMITOS LAND CO •&
~ACl,IC T!~·AC! ,~Qj!CT
04•03'1'•0"7171•00
SS 12W 03 ALAMITOS \.AND CO •s
•AN W!STI•N ·~T~Q
Ooi•037-071'1'2•00
IS
5I
ss
ss
ss
IS
IS
12W OJ IAHIY
TUACO
04•0:1'1•01111•00
12W 03 I!HTON
TeXACO
.O.•O:I7•0IIIt•OO
12W Ol IIXIY
A~CD
04•03'7•01111•00
12W Ol IIXIY
C:HIVRON US&
Ooi·037•01&11•00
•1
•1
• 1
12W Ol'IIXIY A •3
CONTININTAL OIL
o•·oJT•OII7I·OO
12W Ol IIXIY A
CONTININrAL DIL
04•0:1'7•011'1't•OC)
12W 03 SIXIY A
CONTININTAL OIL
O.t•O:J7•0IIIO•OO
12W 03 IIXIY A
CONTININTAL OIL
Ooi•037•0itii·OO
.,
•T
IS 12W 03 IIXIY A •22
CONTININTAL OIL
o•·o37·0itts•oo
SS 12W 03 IIXIY A •33
CONT!NIOTAL OIL
04•037•07001•00
SS 12W 03 <llXI't A "l4
CONTININTAL DIL
0&•037•0'7007•00
SS 12W OJ IIXI't A #ll
CONTINENTAL OIL
o•·o37·07011*00
D!~TH
!I.!Y DATA lOCS
Ot/OS/78 04TA I!
t,lll HIST
J1CL
t,lOO
21CL
•.2eo
2St=L
DATA
12/JI/10 DATA
I , It], MIST
1101' COAl
05/0 I /27 DATA
1,110 1-tfST
1 I D,- CO !!til
I:Z/31/10 DATA If
'7,t7C HJST!
ICL
Ot/26/27 OAT~ I!
5,225 MIST
1 001' C"Oitl
04/27/77 OATA
S,"SIO HIST
I 1 0, C 0 •t
Ol/21/27 DATA
1,304 HlST
1 oopr ca-..1
OI/O.C/27 DATA
S,HI HilT
4&DP' co••
OS/11/27 DATA
H !ST
1701' CDIItl
Ool/25/41 DATA
1,721 HUT
lOCiL SM'L
07/20/22 DATA
1,110 HlST
7'10,.
11/ It /II DATA !
10, 77'7 HIST
411<1 Sliii'L
03/02/27 DATA II
S,IU HIST I
10' co••
o•/tt/27 DATA
8,410 HUT
70,
01/0l/27 CAT& 1!
I. I IS H 1ST
7DP' COJitl!
11/01/21 DATA II
7,124 HIST I
10, ~A
01/2./30 DATA
1,.24 HUT
100'
10/12/32 DATA "A
1,011 HIST
1001'
DATA !
5.131 HlST
100,
1 .L[AS! NA~E AND NUMI!~ CO~'L!T!D
CA~T S!C 2.0,!-ATO- DEPTH
OAT LOC TW, lllNC: l,A,III~ !I.EY DATA LOCS
.t 7 I 37
170
"
176 J7
55 12W Ol IIXIY A •11
CONTINI!NT&L OIL
04·037•07137•00
SS 1:w OJ llXBY A •1&
C:lHCCO
04·0:J'7-0't1&7-00
SS 12W OJ !lXCY ~ •"76
CONTINENTAL OIL
04•037•0714'1'•00
01/12/51 DATA !
10,511 HIST
I~L
DATA
1,022 MIST
01/lS/70 DATA l!
1,027 HlS:T E
'~L
I.LlAS! HAM! AND HUMI!~ CDM,L!T!D
CA~T sec 2,0P!~ATO~ O!rTH
OAf LOC lW~ -HC ].A,JI !L!Y DATA LOCI
171 37
H
170
176
H
171 :17
H
176
140
I H
H
176 J7
H
H
1H
H
171 3'7
171
176
1230
H
171
H
) 17.
I
H
t 7'
171
17' 37
1540
H
171 37
176 37
1 7' , 7 .
H
176 37
1150
,,, :17
H
5$ 12-w O:J liXISY A 1171
5$
ss
CONTlH!NTAL OIL.
04•0J7•0'T14t·OO
12W OJ 80HN!R
AACD
tlW Ol !OTT
CI!:TTY
04·037·011&1·00
12W O:S IAICE
JwtOitTON I DOLLI!Y
04·0=1:1·07!111•00
• 1
• 1
5$ 12W Ol llltiSEkOlN! •1
C !TTY
04•0l7•07117•00
SS 12~ OJ ISAUSH t SHORE WI
! J ISAAN!SCN
04•0::17•01111•00
~S tl~ Ol BRYANT •1
~CRT!~ SISNON !T AL
04·0l7•07tii·OO
IS 12W Ol !~YANT •1A
C!'TTY
O&•Ol7•07tii•OO
~S llW D~ ISIItYANT •11
C!TTY
0&•0:17•07111•00
&S 12W 03 BRYANT •2J.
C!TTY
04•0l7•0'1l,O•OO
SS 12W Ol BRYANT a'21
I:!TTY
04•0:S'T•C''11t1•00
fiS 17W Ol IJI:YAJiiT •:SA
C!TTY
0 4. 0 !17 .. 0 7 11 2- 00
55 12W Cl IRYANT 114A
G!TTY
04•037•0'1113•00
IS 12W 03 I A: Y·ANT wiA
G~TTY
ot•037·0'7tt•·oo
SS 12W 03 BRYANT •6A
C:ETTY
04•037•0'7111•00
5S I%W OJ IRYANT -74
G!TrY
04•037•07111•00
55 12fllf 03 SJI:YANT lilA
GETTY
o•·o:S'!·0'111'7·oo
SS 12W Ol BRYANT 2 Ill
SHU~
04•037•01.11•00
SS 12W 03 SJI:YANT 2 112
SH!L ~
o•·ol7·oa•7I·Oo
~$ 12W CJ lkYANT 2 113
••
••
SHU~
04•037•01477•00
12W. Ol lkYANT 2
SHI!LL
0~·0:1'7-014&0•00
12W Ol BRYANT 2
SH!LL.
04·037 .. 01-'11•00
u
55 12W OJ BRYANT Z ••
SHU~
04•037•0&C&2•00
DATA I!
7,&11 CTHJt
75KI
01/J0/47 OATA
'· 477 HI$'T
110' CCIItl
DATA
A,CI2 HlST
72Dfl'
01/0A/27 OAT.t. l
HIST
1201" COR!
DATA
5, I 10 HIST
240,. COAl!
11/lt/27 DATA
HIST
:SC::III' CCF:.I!
02/ll/71 DATA !
t,COO H!IT
lOKI
o•/04/21 DATA CR
1,40-' HilT
\lOP" C:ORI
DATA
1,521 HIST
2SD~ CDOE
01/07/77 DATA AC:CI
1,213 HilT OA
130~ COO! OTHII
11/01/27 DATA
1,025 HIST
270, C:CJtl!
05/14/27 DATA
1,2,4 HIST
11 01' CD~!:
Ol/01/27 DATA
1,412 HIST
lCD~ CORE
DATA
S, Hl HIST
210~ COOE
01/30/27 DATA
I,ATS MIST
liD,. !:;OIItl!
11/17/27 DATA
!i,OfO HIS.T
1701'"
03/13/52 C.<.TA It
7,360 HUT !
23G~
02/21/C5 DATA E
1,7U HIST
~10~ CORI
11/10/41 DATA I
,,110 HIST
110~ CORE
07/21/41 DATA
1,707 HilT
•tal'" COlt!
05/03/'7 DATA !.
t,'f150 HIST
10 COIItl!
OJ/11/41 DATA I!
1,730 HIST
640,.
12/13/4& DATA i!.
1,700 HIST
no~
I .LEAS! NAME AND NUMI!k C:CMfl'l.!T!D
CAR.T S!.C 2. 011'\!JlATCJt OEF'TH
OAT LCC TWfl' RHC J.Afl'lll EL.!V DATA l.oc 1
176 ss 12w OJ eu~~tc! 111
W ! MC CASLIN
04•037•07131•00
0&/12/00 DATA
6,517 HlST
a or
I ,LrAS! NAMI AHO HUM\r~ COM~l!TrD
CA~T S!C 2,C,fAATO~ O!rTH
CAT LDC T~~ ~NC l,A,I~ !L!Y DATA LOCS
IH
176
176
176
H
176
H
1 7 6
2140
H
111
H
H
37 ,.,, l7
H
176
176
H
171 3'7
"
171 3'7
2020
171
s
l•o
I
5S 12W 03 CLARK ~!! tit
TllliNlTY
04•0l7•0&177•00
I:ZW 03 CLEAY!R
C !TTY
OA•OJ7•071IO•OO
12W 03 CL!AVI!.JI:.
C'! T TT
OA•OJ7·0T111•00
12W Ol CL.E.lVI!A.
C!TTY
0&•037•0'7112•00
• 1
.. 3
IS llW 03 CL[.C.V!Jt w•
CIT TY
04•0l'7•0'7113•00
IS 12W Ol CLI!AVE~ at'5
C!TTY
04·0:1'7•0711··00
I$ 1 2W 0 J r: C H N A L. LV • I
TJI: I HI TY
o•·ol7•0II71·oo
SS I :zw Ol CO~ I! LAND # 1
DOW CHfMICAL. CO
04•0l7-07170-00
IS 12W 03 COTTON #1
COA~
04•0:17•01111*00
5S I 2W 03 CRAJU .,,
CETTY
04•02'7·o'1tta·oo
IS 1 :ZW 03 C:Y,HI!JI. t1 1
MOIItTON & OOLL!Y
04•0l7•07110•00
IS· 12W 03 DALY •1
KLM OIL
o•·Ol7•CIIIl•OO
SS 12W 03 DOTSON •1
ltltDIIlTON & DCLL!Y
o•·o:s-r.·o711 r:ot
IS 12W 03 ODYLI 1'1
AOCC
OC•037•0717&•00
SS 1 2W OJ ! I T • 1
0 !LLICTT !TA~
04•0:S'7•2114t•OO
IS t 2W 03 E I T •2
D !L~IOTT .JII
04·03'7·2210··00
IS 12W 03 E I T •l
0 !LliOTT .JII
OC·037·221'11•CO
IS 1 ZW 0 l ! I T • 4
1&10 E !LLIOTT INC
04•031•22111•00
110
I
.70
I
176
IS 12W·031!1T •s
C IL~IOTT .JII
oc •031• 22177•00
IS 1 2W 0 J ! & T II I
0 !LLIDTT .J~
04•037•22171·00
12W 03 ~ & T
0 ELLIOTT INC
04·037•221'7&•00
•7
IS 1 2W 0 3 !. & T "I
D ELL!Ci"':" J"
O&•Ol7-;';.:t57t•OO
S S I 2W 0 l I I T • I
0 IL~IDTT .JR
OC•O:J7•22S,O•OO
!iS 12W OJ ! I T 1110
D W EL~IOTT
04•027·22111•00
CATA
I, 1 1 !i H 1ST
120f'
OJ/20/77 DATA
1,175 HlST
•
04/21/27 DATA
S, 1'7& HIST
•or
0&/11/7i DATA
1,&11 HIST
•c•
04/22/7" DATA
", 1'7 1 H J S T
•o•
01/04/77 DATA
4, 730 HIST
co•
OG/ 11/2"r DATA
I,OTI HIST
I:JOI' CDJI:.a
••
O'T/31/$1 DATA f
'7,71& Hl$7
111:L
01/21/21 D~TA
S,HI HIST
100~ COOl
o•/2l/2'7 DATA
1.113 HlST
100' COJI..
05/21/11 CAT.<. I
1,100 Ht!tT .
7C L.
01/24/2'7 DATA !
I , I I I HIS T JtA
110, COIIl!
11/30/27 CATA
C,l17 HIST
120~
I, 7 It
3G~
0 ILL
D!!!.
04/28/11 O:.T.C. r:ILL
I, 1 II HIST CtLL
:sea s~, t. ontt
01/01/12 DATA DILL
1,211 HIST
~G~
01/12/&; DATA DILL
1,'411 MIST OTHI
lG~ OTH~
--,
02/11/11 D~T~ DILL
1,477 HJST OTH•
l:L
Ol/2£/11 DOH DILL
I,IU HlST DILL
lCL SM~L
11/01/Bl DATA
1,012 hlST
6GL
0 JL"
N
CCI~
OTH.
QTHI
CTH.l
1:/24/ll C~TA OIL.~
1,167 HIST OTH~
!GL
02/15/1• OATO DILL
a, 17C HlST N
ICt. QTHI
C THI
DATA
I .LEAS! NAM! AND HU~B!~ COM~L!T!D
CART S!C 2.0~ERATO~ O!PTH
OAT LOC TW!6 ~NC l.A,.I.r !L!V DATA LOC$
ss 12WOl!.IT -10
!~LIOTT J T!N!YCK
04•0l"7•%2Sil•OO
HIST OfLL.
1,213 OTH.It
ICL. DTH,_
I,
~ SS 12W Ol ~ ! ~L.LIOTT
• 1 1
--~ ..
DATA
I o4·03"7·22S&2•00
•
1 ---~--~~~-.r---------~17L-~~T?~hO~ou7 - 55 1:2W 0] 111ST DILL OTH~
OT'HR
OTH"
~-~--~.~.~-,~,~w~o~l-.,-;,-,T~----------~~;-~_.~--------OOAATTAA~---- .' t t o w ! 1. l. I 0 T T
04•037•%'%51l·OO
:__---.----~s=s--~1~2~W~O~l~E~I;-TT------------~.~102~-------------------oortc"7" !I.LJOTT .1 T!N!YCK 1,5'71 OTHIIt
-.
111
111
1"
04·0~"7·2211l•OO SCL.
ss 12"" Ol
'.S 12WOJ!.T liS
!l.LIOTT I TeN!YCK
04•0l7•l:JOII•OO
55 12WC;! .IT' .r11
ss
ss
ss
!""!OTT I T!N!YCK
04·0]7•ll01"7•00
12W OJ ! I T -17
!""!OTT I T!N!YCK
o•·Ol7•230II•OO
1 2W 0 3 EN L Q! r 1
CU.LII'
o••0]'7•0712I•OO
12W Ol IT ... ,
~ W HUDTT J~
04•037•21149•00
12W Ol !VANS ~!I -1
I, 13.&
·=-
1, ·coo
·=-
OIL I.
a 1""
OTHIIt
OTMJ:t
OTHIIt
or 1. 1.
OIU
AC:MT
01""
D I""
ono'
DIU
1,511 DILL
sc" ora
01/14/27 OATA
4,711 HIST
11011'
01/J0/71 O&TA
1,100 HIST
JC"
ACMT
COl~
OTH~
Cf.TTY
04•0l'T•O'Tttt•OO
.:lATA
4,4'70 HtST
200~ \.
i':":":-:":----::-;-~':;'::;"-::-::~-:-:-------':7"----;-:;:;-:;77':1-;;";;";":--.-171 H IS IZW Ol H! •I 10/21/ll DATA . '
IH
IH H
Z110
•
IH
171 31
171
IH
Ill
Ill
171
IS
ss
ss
5S
IS
IS
5$
ss
ss
ss
0 W !-~!OTT INC 7,%11 HilT
0&•037•01 111•00 10C~
12W OJ ~L~MiNG •t
COAL
06•03'7 .. 01!11•00
12W Ol '~!!MAN 11
KLM 0 n
04"037•07933•00
t:.:W 03 fUI!LLI!R
TRINITY
O&•O:J'T•Oit'Tt•OO
• 1
12W 03 :!TTY •t2
~ MC AT!!~ I W ~ W!~~~·
0&•037•01137•00
llW Ol CJISON 11
SUN.DCK on
0&•037·07177•00
12"' 03 CI!CK 'I
C!TTY
01•037•01-200•00
12W Ol :~AVI!S •t
c•OWN CINTRA" ~!TRD
04•03'7•011•&·00
12W 03 CiRE!N •1
su~uro• an
0&•037·01111•00
12W 03 HI!L.I.!R 11
C!TTY
OC•037•0.,t01•00
12W Ol HlL.L
COAL
04•c;:J7•0IJ17•0p
1.2W 03 HOOC!S 't
COAL
0-'•0l'T•Oitii•OO
01/0S/21 DATA
1,413 HIST
21 DATA II
7,23& HilT u,
07/11/21 DATA
5,&1& HilT
Z2
07/01/27 DATA RA
7,110HIST
I 10~ CO~!
Ol/l0/27 DATA
&,Ill HilT
IOD~
OS/11/21 OAT&
1,2&1 HIST
210~ CDR!
01/0I/27 DATA
1,301 HIST
zoe~
01/23127 DATA
I, 171 HIST
020~ CD~!
DATA
1,012 HIST
HD~ CDR!
11/0I/51 DATA
7,l30 HilT
;:ZOF SM~L
01/11/27 DATA
&,Ill HIST
a·o~ co~!
CART
I, LI!'AS! HAM!: AHO HU~:S.!R. CCMPLE:T\!!0
2.0P'!RATOR O!rTH
OAT L.OC TW,. ~HC l,API• !l!Y DATA LOCS
111
H
171
H
171
H
171
H
171
H
170
171
H
17 I l7
H
I 7 I
lliO
H
170
170
H
177
10 H
177
H
177
H
177 37
H
i77
H
177 37
H
177
H
177
3i0
H
H
177
H
177
H
37 177 l7
H
177
H
ss
5S
12W OJ HO"WlT% •t
SUI'!A.IOR OIL
Ot·Ol7•01511•00
12W OJ HUI.!S!RT 1'1
'/Ill ! MC CASLIN
O.t•037•07tli·OO
12W03 ITA1.0 "'20
ITALO ~M!"ICA~ ,!TA.O
04·037•07931·00
SS I%W OJ J ,.AUL C!TTY CL! •2
OIL 'NI!LL. SI!RY
04·037·0"711:1·00
SS 12W Ol JAJrolt!S lf'l
ss
ss
C!TTY
04•037·0'7102•00
12W 03 JON!.$
C IS I.OMI!S
04•037·07131•00
12W Ol JUDSON
ALAMtTOI
04•0l7•011S2•00
~·
• 1
51 1:::w Ol JUDSON •1
cu"~
O&·Ol7•07t2,•00
SS 12W Ol JUOSDN lf2
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
IS
IS
II
IS
ss
IS
IS
ss
TN.IHITT
o•·Ol7·0it&o•oo
12W 03 JUDSON lf'l
C~OWN C!~TRA" ~~T~D
04•0l7•0114t•OO
I:ZW 03 JUDSON If'&
TlltlNITY
o•·ol7•0it&t·oo
1ZW 03 .JUDSON •S
CROWN C!NT"AL ~I!T•a
04•03'7•011SO•OO
12W Ol JUOSCN lf'l
DOW CHI"ICAL
04•0l7-07t71•00
12W 03 JUDSON MC ClltATI #1
TllliNITY OU.
04•037•00112•00
12W Ol KI!""AS
CITTY
04•037•0TI03•00
Ml
12W Ol K!NK!L lf't
SU~!~IC~ Cl~
04•0:17•01SI7•00
12W 03 KINDIG •t
MORTON I DC~LIY
04·037•07112·00
12W Ol LIEII!~MAN
G!TTY
04•037•0'1104•00
IZW 03 "CR41NI •t
K"" on o•_,o37• t lll:l·oo
12W 03 "DYIU II
TIXACD
04•037•00112•00
12W 03 MAitOUIS •t
C!TTY
04·0l7•0'TIOS•OO
12W 03 MAitOUlS •t
K~M 0'"
0&·037•07113•00
IZW 03 MC A-~IN! A"AMIT •t
~ ~ HUGHS
0&•037•07130•00
12W Ol MC CRATH •11
MARINA ~ACI~ICA
04•037•0'71S7•00
12W Ql MC G~ATH •3
A It CO
04•037•0IISI·OO
12W 03 MC CRATH •4
CCNTININTA" OIL
04•0l7•071S&•OO
01/22/27 DATA
S,CtO HIST
5JD,.
Ot/:Z7/l7 :lATA
5,517 HIST
1701' C:O.It!
11/15/27 DATA
5,JOS HIST
J'TOII'
DATA
S,,74 lOST
:14 T A
I, 101 HIST
31011' C:CJIII!
Ol/01/27 DATA
4,750 HJST
1701'
Ol/11/27 0AT4
1,]!1 MIST
:ZID~.
01/21/17 OATA
1,410 HIST
SID I'
07/25/27 OATA
1,451 lOST
210~
07/10/27 DATA
1,111 HIST
•so,
0-,/01/2' OATA
1,510 HIST
55Dfl'
DATA
2,114 HlST
07/01/27 OAT&
4,100 l•tlST
210~
01/20/27 DATA
1,44% HliT
200~
01/25/27 Dt.TA
S, 12Q HIST
310~ CUI·
01/10/27 DATA
I,SSOHIST'
liD~ CO-!
01/%5/27 OA.TA !
1,410 HIST
I&
DATA
4,101 HIST
zoo~
01/07/27 OATA
&,110 HIST
110~ CDR!
01/01/27 DATA
I, liZ HilT
&10~ CDRI
OS/10/27 DATA
1,103 HIST
110,- C:Oit!
DATA
I,Tit HIST
05/31/27 DATA
I, 12& H!ST
11 COR!
O-::z./17/"27 DATA f
1,210 H!ST
IJD~ co•!
05/21/27 DATA
S,I&S HlST
tlD~ CDR!
r \ )
I.~EAS! NAMI AND NUM!!R COMP~!TfO I .L!A~! HAM! AND HUMI!R COM~~ET!O CAR.T S!C: l.OP'!II:ATC"l OI!.I'TH CART sa: 2.0°!P.ATQJI: OI!:~TM OAT L.O: TWIIJ .AHC l.A,II I!L!'f DATA l.O~S OAT L.OC TW~ "lNC l.AI'J• I!'LI!Y OAT.& LOCS 177
.. o
177
177
111
1 77
H
I ~7
1<0
" 177
H
177
177
H
177
H
177 l'7
177
1240
H
177
H
177 3'7
177
H
177
H
177 l7
H
177
H
177
H
177
H
1'7'7
1110
H
177
H
177 l7
H
177
H
177
5$ 12W 03 MC CAATH a'l
MA-.tHA 'ACI,..JCA
04•03'7•0'7111•00
SS 12W 03 MC CAATH •tA.
lw4A~INA ,&Cl,..ICA
04•03'7•211SJ·OO
5S J 2W o:J MC GRATH
MARINA fiACII"ICA
04·037·07111•00
SS I:ZW OJ MC CR.ATM •lOR
MARINA .-ACIJI'ICA
04•037•21154•00
SS 12W OJ MC CRATH 1tl2
""AIUHA PACI,-ICA
04·037•0'115&•00
SS I :ZW O::l MC: CRATH •1l
MARIJ<A PACJI"ICA
o•·ol'7·0715t•OO
5$ 1 :ZW OJ MC GRATH 1114
MARIN& PACII'ICA
04•0]7·07110•00
55 12W Ol ~C C~ATH 1tl41t
MAitiNA •ACII"ICA
04·03'7•21951·00
5S 12W 03 ~C: CR.ATH 111!
'"'AitlHA ,ACl,ICA
04•031·0,.1'72•00
IS 12¥f Ol MC CR.ATH •11111
MAIItiNA P&CIJI'lCA
04•03'7•21151•00
SS 12W 03 MC GRATH 1111
MAif.IN.J. PACI,..ICA
04 .. 0l'7•01tii•OO
SS ~2~ 03 MC: ::RATH 111llt
JoiAI:tlNA IIJACI,ICA
04•037•2111'7•00
SS 12W 03 MC GRATH •1'7
><Ait!NA PACI,!CA
04•037•07111•00
CS 12W' Ol ~C GRATH .,II
><Ait!NA •ACI,ICA
04•03'7•07112•00
5$ 1lW 03 MC CP\~TH 'llllt
><AJtll<A .ACI,!CA
0&•037•21tSJ•OO
iS 12W 03 MC GRATH •tt
JoiA .. lHA fiACII"tCA
04•0l'7•-Q'7173•00
55 12W Ol JilfC GRATH •%1
1ST WAJt.!N ' MC c•&TH
06•0l7•0U17•00
SS 12\0 03 ><C CltATH ~22
MA.IHA •&CI,IC&
04•037•0711&•00
IS 12W Ol MC ClllATH '%211l
.. UlNA PAC!'IC
04.037-.2, t 10•00
5S 12W 03 MC ~lll&TH •%211l
M&JtiN& ••cxnca
04•037·~1110-00
IS t~W 0~ MC G~AfH •13
CONOCO
~4·03~-0,.111•00
SS 12W 03 MC GJit&TH M2~11t
.. A~!NA PAC!,!CA
04•037•21111•00
SS 12W Ol MC GRATH •24
MA~!HA PACI,ICA
04 .. 03'7·07142-00
SS 12W 0:1 MC GJitATk •2411t
MAiltiHA· PACIJI'ICA
04•037•21112•00
5$ 12W 03 MC CiAATH #21
01/11/2'7 DATA
1,000 HIST
140,.. SJroi!IJL
CO~E
1, 3 I I
IOCL
DATA
117
1110
H
177
SS 1 2W 03 MC "~AS TI!JI::S II I
T!XACO
04•03'7•01513•00
SS 12W Ol MCCRATM •11R
MARINA ,.C.Ct,.ICA
04•03'7•21951·00
177 37 SS 12W Ol M!RRITT TAYL~~ •1
OATA
1,120 HlST
1 1 o,.. co,. r
03/31/71 DATA
1,334 HIST
13CL QTHIIt
05/31/27 OATA
1,117 HIST
120, :o~e
01/12/27 DATA
5,571 HlST
110' COJ~:;I
01/20/27 DATA
I, tOO HIST
I 1 0, CO lit I!
02/15!71 DATA
I, 117 HIST
I 3Ct.. QTHJI:;
01/01/27 DATA
1,175 HIST
110• CO~I
Ol/2.2/10 DATA
t, 141 HlST
1 3GL
01/20/71 DATA
'7,110 HlST
1 1 Dl"
OS/11/71 DATA
l,tll HIST
13CL OTH.
07/05/%7 C&TA
1,417 HIST
100' co•1
10CL
0&/11/10 DATA 11
7,UZ HUT I
100,
1. 0:1'7
toea
DATA
10/0'1/27 DATA
1,077 HilT
120' co•e
01/01/21 DATA I
tO,OtZ HIST
12 01/26/lO OATA
1,006 HIST
1 I 0'
Ol/2l/IO OATA
I ,llO HIST
13CL
1, Ol7
IOGL
DATA
01/2$/lO DATA
7,111 HIST
100,
OAT&
IOCL
17'7 37
177
177
H
t77 37
177 l7
177
2 "0
H
177
H
177
H
177 l7
177
H
177
177
H
177
2&10
H
177
H
177
H
177
H
177
177
177
272"
H
177
H
OATA ! 177
I,OU HIST ~~
I I 01' OTHJit
DATA 177
IOGL
177
150 KLM OIL
04•03'7·07134•00
SS 12W OJ MlTCH~LL. RlrLfY •I
,ACI.,IC SU''"Y
04•0l'T•07tii·OO
5S 12W I)J MUR.fiHY Ill
PAN W!ST!~N PET~D
04•037·0'1t7l•OO
SS I :ZW 03 MUitii'H'f •2
II'AH WESTERN ~!TJI:;O
04·037·07174•00
SS T:ZW Ol MUR,HY •J
PAN WEST!ItN '!T"O
04•037·07171·00
SS 12Jif Ol NA .. L.I!S •t
PAN WI!STI!ItN PI!TIItQ
04•03,.·00331•00
SS 12W 03 NA,L.I!S 112
PAM WI!STI!IItN PITIItO
04•037•071'71•00
II 12W Ol NA,L.IS 113
'AN WISTI•N •1T•0
04•03'7•:)'7177·00
SS 12W Ol NA~I.IS •4
~AN W!STE~N ~!T•o
04·CJl7·071'TI·OO
S$ t 2W 03 "-A~I.!S •I
PAN WI!STI~H ,.!T~O
04•C3'T•O'Tt71•01
SS 1:w Ol NAPL!S Ill
,AN WISTI~N 'ITJtO
0&•037•07910•00
IS 12W Ol NA,L!S •'7
,AN WIITE•N 'IT•o
O&•Ol'7•0'T,I1•00
IS 12W Ol NICHOL.SOH •t
CITTY
0&•03'7•0'7901•00
IS 12w o3 osT""'" "'
ALAMITOS
04•03'7•01913•00
SS 12llf 03 I'AJI:K •t
AMlNOIL
04•03'7•10&71•00
·1s 12w Ol •Au "
HlltL!Y SUPPLY CO
06•0l7•0712I•OO
IS 12W 03 PA·- ,lltSON ~~
CITTY
06•0l1•01101•00
IS 12W Ol ,AIItllt ~llltSON •2
C!TTY
,0& ·03'7•0'7108•00
SS I:ZW 0~ PAA~ '!lllSON •3
CITTY
04•037-0'7101•00
IS 12W 02 ~AJI:;IIt PERSON M4
wiTTY
OA-037•01110•00
IS 12W 03 •&TTIItSON ~~
CUL'
, •• 037•07121•00
ss 12w "3 •usoN •1
c•owN CINT.AL PIT.O
OA·03'7·01111·00
IS 12tlf Ol PRATT #13
wiTTY
0&•037•0'TI11•00.
IS 12W Ol AAYMOHQ I.AJitSIH •1
o&/:5/27 DATA
1,520 '11ST
%20,..
11/11/71 DATA
10,011 MIST
1lCL
01/10141 DATAl
1,211 HIST
IOJII.I
01/13127 DATA I!
,,110 HIST
t:c,
01/01/:7 JA7A
4,754 HlST
13DI" COR!
OAT.\
1,411 HIST
ICC,. co•l!
Ot/14/51 DATA!.
'7,100 l't!ST
13 $"'~~' L
CORE
02/:ZOil7 OloTA Jf
5,ltl HlST I
210,
04/14/2'7 O~TA
1,151 HIST
'ZIO, COlt!
03/21/%7 DATA
1,02l HilT
210' co••
04/12/27 DATA
5,110 HIST
2SD~ COIIt!
01/2,/70 QATA I!
7,l71- H!ST I
"CL co•E
06/0S/27 OATA
1,021 HilT
210, co•E
CATA
I, S07 HJST
210, CO~I
01/21/27 DATA
1,121 HIST
IIDI" SM'I..
CATA
ljiOI HlJT
ltOfl' CO~!
OJ/10/27 OATA
H!ST
07/ll/27 OATA
1,410 H!ST
210'
OS/H/27 OATA
l,lll HilT
600' COlt!
OAT&
I,HO HilT
230' CO!Itl
DATA
S,lSl HIST
liD'
OI/01/:Z7 OATA
1,471 HIST
420, CO~!
01/25/27 DATA
0,101 HJST
100,
01/10/27 OATA
1,303 HJST
liD,.
01/0t/27 DATA
1.40\l HIST
22c~ co•a
01/21/27 DAT.O.
HIST
/ H
CONTIH!NTAL OIL
04•037•07111•00
I0/1 1/31 OAT.&
6,lU HIST
130, H
CJitOWN CEHT~&I.. PETillO
04•03'7•01152•00 "0'
,---
(
1 .L!AS! ~AM~ AND HUMS!R CCM~L!TEO 1 .L!AS! NlM! AND ~UMI!~ :OM~L!T!D CA~T S!C CART S!C 2. O'!ltATC~ O!~TH
oAT LOC TW~ R.NC
2,0P!,__ATOR
J.~Pt ...
OI!!PTH
~LI!V DATA LO:S OAT LCC TW~ .Q:NC l,API... !L!Y DATA LD:S 177
177
"' 37
177
177
177
171
177 37
'\ 177
,HIO ,H
171
IO
K
171 l7
IH
.I 17'
17&
171 37
llo
H
I 1 I 37
I 1 I 37
I 1 I 37
17o
H
1 71 l7
IS 12W OJ lt(CHMOND SUMMY •1
W M RtCI-fMONO
04•0l7·079al·OO
SS 1~W OJ SALES #1
~ ~ PARTRIOC!
04·037•07912-00
55 12~ Ol SAN CAIR.lEL •t
CM!VRON USA
o a • o l ~ ·. o a .. to· o o
SS 12W OJ SAN :ASAICL •l
CH!VRON USA
oa-o::r7•0I4t2·00
SS 12W Ol SAN ~ASRI!L ,5
CH!V~ON USA
55 12W OJ SAN CA8AI!L •I
CH!VRON USA
04•0J7·014tS•OO
SS 12W OJ SAN CA!AlfL -7
CH!VRON USA
04·0l7•0I•ti·OO
55 12W 03 SAN CA!R[!L •t
CHEVJitON USA
04·0l7•014ti•OO
SS 12W 03 SA~ C~IAI!L #10
CHI!VAOH USA
04•03'1•014tt•OO
SS 12W Ol SAN CAIRIIL •1l
CHI!VR.ON USA
04•037•01527•00
SS 12W OJ SAN CAIRI!L W14
CH!V~D~ USA
04•0J7•01521•00
5S I:ZW Ol SAN CAIRI!L •t•A
CHIYJitCN USA
0<&·037•0112t•OO
SS 12W 03 SAN CABJitiEL liS
CH!V~ON USA
04•037•01530•00
SS IZW 03 SAN CAIRI!L •11
CH!VOON USA
00•037•01121•00
55 12W 03 SAN CAIR(IL •11
CH!UON USA
o•·o37·0IS33•oo
SS 12W Ol SAN CAIJiti!L -•tt
CHI!YRON USA
04•037•0&534•00
5$ 12W 03 SAN CAIRI!L •21
CH!VRON USA
0<&•037•01531•00
IS 12W 03 SAN CAI~I!~ •22
CH!VOON USA
00 •027•01521•00
IS l2W 03 SAN CAI~I!~ •21
CH!VRON USA
04•037 .. 01101•00
IS 12W 03 SAN CAI~I!~ •21
CHIY~ON USA
.04•037•01102•00
5$ 12W 03 SAM CAI.liL •27
CH!YIItOM USA
04•037•01103•00
IS I:ZW 03 SAN CAIIIti!L #21
CHI!UQH USA
04·037•0110<&•00
IS 12W 03 SAN CAIRl!L •21
CH!UON USA
04•0l7•01SOS•OO
IS 12W 03 SA~ CAIA[!L M30
CH!Y~ON USA
04•037•01501•00
5$ 12W 03 SAH CAI~I!L ~31
CHI!YJitON USA
04•037-01507•00
5S 12W 03 SAN CAI~IEL -32
CH!VRCH USA
04•037-01501•00
OS/ll/27 DATA
HIST
ltDJI'
05/77/77 JATA
!5,502 HlST
•o•
02/76/21 OAl'A
S, IQJ HIST
12DJI'
Ot/01/27 Oi'lTA
4,707 HIST
t30JI'
Ol/25/21 DATA
S,Ot7 HIST
140JI'
04/12/21 DATA
I, 121 HISi
140,
05/12/21. DATA II
4;, 713 H.tST lltA
140JI'
01/17/2t OATA
S,4l2 HIST
14DF
11/14/21 OATA
S, &II HIST
r•o~~t
10/11/27 DATA
S,IIO HlST
1~01'
07/07/2'1' DATA
4,501 HIST
13DJI'
OJ/27/27 DATA
I, 1&0 HIST
1201'
I:Z/Il/21 DATA A;A
S, OlS HIST
ol ODP'
01/07/21 04TA
0,700 HilT
1 1 0~
OS/20/21 DATA
c. 7!1 HIST
120~
03/20/21 OAT& If
5,171 HIST
1<&01'
01/19/21 OATA
1,017 HIST
100~
10/00/21 OAT&
I, 012 HilT
100~
07/07/ll DATA
1,322 HIST
100~
Ol/00/72 DATA a
1,100 HIST
100~
01/10/H DATA !
I, SSO HIST
14D,.
I 1 I 37
171 37
H
171 l7
171 37
H
171 l7
110
171 37
17& 37
171 37
171 l7
171 37
171 37
1230
H
171 l7
I 7 I 37
H
17& 21
H
171 37
H
171 37
1,. 31
171 37
... o
H .
17& 27
17& 37
.H
01/0I/12 DATA ! 17&
&,Ill HIST C!NT
130~ H
00/23/10 DATA !
0,171 HilT
lCD~
01/23/H OATA I
t,o•o HIST
170~
07/30/10 DATA !
1,115 HIST
170~
01/21/H OATA I!
•• Ill HIST
170~
17& 27
H
171
17&
1110.
H
17&
SS 17W 03 SAN CAIRI!L #34
CH!'V.OH USA
04•03'1•01510•00
SS 12W 03 SAN CASAI!L •lS
CHI!V~OH USA
04•037·01111•00
SS 12W OJ SAN CASRI!~ •ll
CH!VJitON USA
04·0l7·0IS12•00
$$ 12W Ol SAN CASRI!L •l7
CH!YJtCN USA
04•037•01113•00
5$ 12W Ol SAN CAIIIttiL Mll
CH!Y~ON USA
04·037-01111•00
IS 12W Ol SAN CAI~I!l '40
CH! VJitDN USA
04•0J7·0~SII·OO
SS 12W Ol iAN CABRI!L •41
CHI!YR.ON USA
04 .. 037·01117•00
SS "12W 03 SAN CAI~l!L •42
CH!Y.ON USA
04•037·01111•00
IS 12W OJ SAN CAIRJ!L ., ••
CHI!V~ON USA
04•037•01111•00
II 12W 03 SAN CAI~IIL •41
CHIV~CN Ul4
04•037·01120•00
IS 12W OJ SAN CAI.I!L •41
CHIVJitON USA
o•·ol7•0IS23·oo
IS 12W Ol SAM CAI~li!L •••
CHI!YRCN USA
o•·ol7-oas2&·oo
IS 12W 03 SAN CAI~J!L •so
CH!Y~ON USA
o••ol7-0I12I•OO
IS 12W 0~ SAN ;AI~l!L .t'lt
CHI!Y~ON USA
OO•Ol7•0&S01)•00
U 12W 03 SAN CAIRIH •SZ
CHIY~ON USA
04•0l"T•O&S4t•OO
1_5 12W Ol SAN CAIR I !L #53
CH!Y~ON USA
04•037-01!542•00
IS t:ZW Ol SAN CAIRl!L •s•
CHI!Y~ON USA
0<&•037•01513•00
IS 12W 02 SAN CAIRII~ •11
CHIY~ON USA
l)•·ol7• 20IIl·I)O
IS 12W 03 SAN CAB~II!~ &~AM •1
, -~CHI!Y~ON USA
OC•027•0&SOS•OO
IS 12W Ol SAN CAIRII~ &~AM •z
CHI!Y~ON USA
04 .. 037•01141•00
SS 12W 03 SAN CAIJitJIL ALAM •3
CHIY.DN USA
O<&•Ol7-0&S47 .. 00
SS 1:ZW 03 SAN JOAQUIN •t
CITTY
OI-Ol7•07t11•00
JS t :ZW Ol SAM .JOAOU J N •2
CaTTY
OC•Ol1•01120•00
IS 12W 03 S8 •1
C!TTY
O<&•Ol7•07tt2•00
IS SlW 03 Sl .t':Z
C!TTY
04•037-07113•00
IS t2W o:r Sl .t'l
CITTY
·0•·037•07Jti•OO
02/01/''1 OAT& !
,,210 MIST
1101"
03/ll/ol7 DATA I!
4,511 HlST
1701'
1<J/04/47 04TA !
4,502 HIST
17 01'
10/0l/&7 DATA !
5,554 HIST
ItO'
05/1 1/49 OATA !
t, Jl.O HlST
110,.
04/IS/'50 DATA !
1,&70 HIST
1701'
05/lt/50 CATA
5,220 HIST
210,.
04/05/10 CATA I!
S,tiS H!ST ACCI
110'
03/17/Sl DATA
10,000 WIST
2101'
01/17/54 DAT4 I
10,111 HlST
110,.
01/11/14 DATA I!
10,100 HlST
17DIIf
02/01/10 DATA I!
10,100 HIST
170,
02/ZI/10 CATA !
10, ISO HIST
110~
01/07/$1 DATA
tO, 100 HlST
230~
01/0S/!55 DATA
10,213 HlST
170jr
01/23/51 DATA I
1,501 HIST
110~
01/0•/10 OATA I
1,111 HIST QTHR
200~
Ol/11/0$ OATA
1,031 HIST
170~
02/22/05 OATA I
I,UI HIST
liD~
OS/11/51 DATA I!
1,.50 HlST.
20011f
11 01'
DATA
H 1ST
07/21/27 OATA ~A
I,IIS HlST
1 10~ CO~!
01/02/27 OAT&
I, 100 HIS T
3so• co~r
Ol/27/27 DATA
I,SOO HlST
10Dfl' COR.!
01/21/27 DATA
I,SIO HIST
1 101' COR!
/
(
1 .lEAS!' NAM! AND ~UMa!R COM,L!T!'O
CART SEC :Z.OPERATOR Ofi'TH
OA':' LOC TWP R.HC l,APII' !LEV OATA LOC&
171
H
17&
17&
H
174
17&
17&
1 1 a :n
H
171 37
H
17&
H
171
H
11&
H
11&
2Cl0
H
1,.
H
111
17&
171
H
11&
H
111
H
171
171
2730
H
171
H
1,.
111
H
171
H
"'
SS 1%W Dl Sl .,,
C!'TTV
04•0l7•07111-00
5S 12W OJ Sfi fl7
COAL
04·0l7·DIIII•OO
ss 12~ oJ sa N&
CETTY
04•037•0711&•00
~s 12w oJ sa •1o
CETTY
OC•Ol7•07117·00
ss 1:zw o3 sa .,,,.
C!TTY
Ot•OJ7•07111•00
55 12W 03 SM!!TO~ *1
W ! MC CASLIN ! I KINN
Ot•037•07140•00
15 12W 03 SMITH fll
T!XACO
04·0:J7•0II&4•00
IS 12W 03 T!RRAINE COMMUNI fl1
PAN W!ST!~N '!TRO
04·0&7•01417•00 ,'
SS 12~ 0~ 7ERRAIHE COMMUNI -2
~AN ~EST!IN ~ETRD
04·037•21101•00
SS 12W 03 T!RRAlN! ,COMMU~l fll
~AN •!ITIIN ~!TRO
04•027•21101•00
5$ 12W 0~ THOM~SOH •1
UNION DRLG I ~!T~O
04•03"7•0&113•00
SS 12W OJ T"U~STON •1
C!TTY
04-037•07121•00
IS 12W 03 TINCH!~ •t
MDI It.
04•03'7•07111•00
SS 12W 03 WAHL #1
CETTY
o•·o37•07122·00
5$ 12W Ol ~~S!M M2
MOitL
OC·0:7•071ti•OO
12W Ol WASEM Nl
MD IlL
04-037. 0"'/1 10 .. 00
tlW Ol WASEM .,.
MOBIL
04-037•07111•00
12~ OJ WAS!M •I
MOBIL
04•037•07112•00
12W 03 WASEM •I
MOa!L
o•·Ol7·0711l·OO
12W OJ WAS!M •'A
MOBIL
04•037•0711··00
12W OJ WASEM •7
MOBIL
04•03'7•07111•00
12W OJ WAS!N •I
MD IlL
04•037•0'7117•00
iS 12W OJ WHIT! HA-T •1
MOIIL
04•03'7•07111•00
5' 12W OJ WILLIAMS M1
CETTY
04•037•0'7123•00
IS 12W Ol WILLIAMS fl2
G!TTY
04•037•0'7124•00
• 5S 12W Ol WOLF! 111
CULII'
04·03'7•07121•00
0~/22/27 DATA
5, 400 HlST
1IO!f COit.!
06/20/27 DATA
1,5,0 HIST
1101' CORE
Oi/01/2'7 Oll1A
5, 473 HIST
1SOII' COlt!
0,/24/27 DATA
1,350 HIST
12D> CD~I
07/11/27 DATA
I,OO::Z HIST
22D> CD~I
01/17/27 DATA
5,C20 HIST
11011' coRe
01/2&/%7 DATA
l,l71 HlST
1 lOll' CORE
12/00/77 DATA E·
1,100 HIST
23D> CORI
02/02/1& OAT& DILL
7,SO& HlST N
21 ~L DTHR
DATA
1,'700 HilT
21 01/11/27 DATA
4, u.3 HIST
CATA
4,113 HIST
220>
04/24/27 DATA
1,307 HIST
210~ CORI
DATA
1,232 HIST
210>
OS/ 11/21 DATA
2,110 HIST
200>
05/10/27 DATA
&,t12 HIST
220~
05/11/21 DATA
1,010 HIST
20D>
01/10/21 DATA
. 1,301 HIST
110~
01/11/27 DATA
1,1&2 H!ST
220>
10/27/27 DATA
I, 222 HIST
220>
01/21/27 DATA
1,411 HIST
22D>
03/21/11 DATA
5,111 HIST
l4CL
DATA
1,3&& HUT
200~
01/12/27 DATA
1,410 HIST
liD> CORI
05/21/21 DATA
5,411 HIST
14D> COk!
0&/12/27 DATA
1,311 HIST
2SD>
I.L!AS! NA~! ANC NUMI!~ COM~l!T[D
CART S!C 2,0P!~ATO~ O!~TH
OAT LOC TW' ,_NC l.A~l• !L!Y DATA LOCS
171
171
H
17&
H
1,.
lOIO
H
1,.
111
111
111
17&
r,,4 ll
1&&
3010
H
111
H
1U
H
114
H
H
11.1 31
H
, •• 31
H
, .. 2&
H
1&1
1&0
3120
H
1 &I
so
H
1 as
H
liS 3&
H
H
5$ 12W 03 WOODWAitD M7
E J WOODWARD
04·037•01116·00
I I M
04•0'37•01111•00
!iS 1 2W o• *I
,lrl4 H D!TURI(
04-0.:17·07117•00
SS 12W o• IRtiC ~I
C!TTY
04•037•0'7111•00
IS 1 2W 0 4 J 0 N I! S t1 1
I' A WALKI!Jt
04-037•01111•00
IS 1.2W 04 I'AitKI!~ , 1
'II' A WALK!Jl
04-037•01111•00
IS I:ZW Ot W I W •1
MOIIL
04•037•07147•00
5S 12W oa WASEM t11
MDIIL
04·03'7•07141•00
'IS 12W 04 WASIM •I
MDIIL
04•03'7•07111•00
IS 12W 01 COR! HOt.! •&
CITY 0~ LONG lEACH
o•·22'7•0I30I•OO
SS t2W 10 111•1
TRANS AM!JliCA C!VIl
04•037-0it'71-00
IS 12W 10 MC I:RATH •1
!IT&T! 01' WAJtRI!N pt MCG
04•037•07142•00
II 12W to MC CAATH •2
CCHININT&L OIL
04•037•07113•00
IS 12W 10 MC CRATH •I
ARCD
o•·o37·0JII7·00
IS t2W 10 MC ClitATH •2,
II
IS
ss
ESTATI D> WARRIN ~ MC:
o&·o3'1-o71&a:oo
12W tO SAN CAIIRli!L lf2
C:H!YR:J'N USA
0.1•037-0ialt•OO
12W 10 SAN CAIIRI!L lfl
CH!VRDN USA
04•037•0141'7•00
12W 10 SAN CAIRJEL •31
CH!YRON ~S&
04•037-01116•00
12111 10 SAJ\1 CAIJit!EL •41
CHEVRON USA
01•03'7 •0&121 •00
12W 10 SAN CABJU!L 1147
CHEVRON US&
o•·o37•0II22·00
12w 10 u~ "' 14Jtl
CHAM~LlN ~~T"O
04-037•0.1230-00
12W tO U~ M'241RI
CH&Jriiii~LIN ~!TJtO
04 •03'7•0440 1 •00
IS 12W 11 fl2
H!LL"'AN !STAT!
o•·oSI•04212·01
IS I 2W 1 1 M'3
HEt.LMAN !STATI
0&•011•04213•00
SS 12W 11 M'3A
H.!LL.Jr!44N !STAT!
04-011 •04214 ... 00
SS 12W tt 114
H!LLMAN !STAT!
04•0II•Ot2SI•01
05/11/2'1 DATA
1,4,0 HIST
2,0,..
04/01/22 DATA
4,110 HilT
1 : 4 01'
OATA
1,071
CAT&
.. ,572 HIST
1 .. 01'
02/0S/:1 04TA
S,l02 HIST
COlli:!
Ol/01/27 DATA
1,422 HlST
COlt!
01/0l/27 DATA
%, 500 HIST
:20Cl
05/0t/27 DATA
4,712 HIST
15011'
05/01/27 DATA
•,t02 HJST
22D>
0 AT A ""ii"'--
3,123 HIST
12KI IM~L
0~/17/•S DATA Tl'
&,113 HIST
11011' CDIIt!
11/17/2, DAT4 --......
1,311 HIST
1JD> CO~!
Ql/27/27 DATA ~
I,C20 HIST
13D> CORI
01/22/27 DATA ~
l,l40 HJST
13D> COR!
Ol/21/52 DATt. =-..
1,3.11 HIST
1•011' C:ORI!
OJ/21/27 DATA
t,412 HIST
13011'
03/03/27 DATA
4,701 HIST
1lDI'
OJ/14/41 DAtA I
5,112 HIST
1&01'
10/ U/53 DATA
10,331 HilT
IO~L
07/07/13 DATA
5, Ill HIST
10CL
05/lO/iO O.ATA
:1,&17 HIST
11011'
11/21/10 DATA
2,110 HIST
20011'
O::t/17/27 O.ATA ll
C,11a HIST
12D> CCR!
01/07/21 DATA
4,.111 HIST
14011' COIIl!
11/7&/12 DATA I!
s ,117 Ht5T au.
130,. DATA DJl..
H lST.
0&/02/2.7 OAT- 1l
1,050 HIST I!
14011 COIIt~
.r·J
\ '
l.l~AS! HAM! AHC HU~B!~ CDM~L!T!C
1: AJ' T S!C l.OPE~ATOA O!PTH
CAT LCC TW,. -NC ~.A,..I• !L!'i DATA L.oc$
...
ltO
H
115 ll
115 ll
H
111 :II
Ill ll
H
Ill 31
111 ll
111 31
"' 6T0
•
~
"' ll
Ill ll
, .. •
111 ll
111 ll
111 ll
Ill Jl"
111 ll
111
'$ 1211rf 1 1 ••
HELLMAN ESTATE
O&•OSJ•O,:Z51•00
IS 12W 11 •&
HELLMAN !STAT!
o• .. o••-o•:zl7·ot
S$ 12W 11 lfiO
H!LLMAN !STAT!
06•0it""0&211•01
1.5 12W 11 lfiOA
HELLMAN ESTATE
O&•OII·O&:ZC2•00
IS 12WII •11
HELLMAN ESTATE
0&•051•0&213•00
IS 1 2W 1 I "ll
HELLMAN ESTATE
0&•011-0&21"1•00
IS 12W 1 I •It
HELLMAN ESTATE
0&•011•0&211•00
P:S 12W 11 111 I
HELLMAN ESTATE
O&•OII•Ot21&•00
SS 12W I 1 •t7A
HELLMAN I!STATI
o•·oSt•0&27t•oo
DATA
HIST
01/:ZI/tl DATA If
&,170 HJs• t
1101' COitl
0&/11/27 DATA J1
7,130 HIST
ttcl' co~e
10/11/11 DATA II
S,SIOHISTI
1tCI'
01/2,/41 DATA
1,17& HIST
ICDJI' COJtl!
0&/01/'& DATA II
7,512 HIST I
1101' CDIIt! 1
01/11/63 DATA J/
1,117 HIST '
140~ 1
DATA •'
1.&47 HIST '
11DII' co~r •
DATA
S,t12 HIST
120~ COOl
55 I~W II 1'17DLD 01/11/2-:' DATA
H!:..t..MAN !STAT! HIST
o•·o!t·o•27o·oo 11011' co"'!
SS 12W II .-11
HI!LLMAN !STAT!
ot-oSt•o&272·oo
SS 12W 11 #lQ
MELL.MAN !STAT!
04•051 .. 04274•00
SS 1 2W 11 •23
HHLMAtl eSTAT!
o•·oSI·04113·oo
IS 1 2W 1 1 II' :Z I
HHLMAN ISTAT!
O&•OSt•O&III•OO
55 12W It lf21
H!LLMAN !STATI!
04•051•0&511·01
SS l:ZW ~~ --~7
HHLMAN !STAT!
04·051.;0&617•00
SS ~ 2W I 1 w4&
ss
H!LLMAH !STATI!
o•·oSI·0417•-oo
1 2W 1 1 w& I
HHLMAN !STAT!
0&•051•0700&•00
5~ 12W IT •&litO
H!LLMAN ,RO,!RTI!S
04•051•0700··00
ss 1 2w 1 t •so
HHLMAN !STAT!
o•·OII•07005•00
SS 1.2W 11 1'10
HHLMAN !STAT!
O-I•OII•070IS•OO
SS 12W 11 Ill
HHLMAN !STATI
o•·ost-o7ota•oo
5$ 12W 1 1 *12
HHLMAN !STAT!
04•011•212:13•00
ss 1 :zw 1 1 .. '2
HI!LLMAN !STAT!
O&•O!il•212l3•00
5S12W11 #13
H!LlMAN 'lt0'1!~Tl!S
0&•051·21211•00
DATA LE
7,833 HISf!
1101' COJtl
12/tG/&& DATA !
J,&t'1 HlST
14011' CCitl
0'1/17/41 DATA E
7,1U HIST
130~
01/25/&1 DATA 11
S, 110 HIST I
14D~
12/27/12 OArA
1,011 HIST
37~L
01/J0/4' DATA !
1,200 HlST
I SKI
0&/20/$0 DATA I!
1,11SHIST
11K8
04/22/53 DATA
10,907 HIST
11K8 COR!
7,213
02/ 1S/S4 DATA !
&,Sst HIST
20KI
02/14/11 DATA 11
1,&,0 HIST
1-401'
10/02/14 DATA IE
7, &71 HUT
140~
01/17/&4 DATA
I, 750 HUT
4QL
DILL
01/26/IS DATA DILL
'•''' HlST
4GL
C:A"T
1 .L~~$! NAME AND HUM~!R COMPL[T!D
OAT LO.C TWP ANC
l,D,!AATDA
l,APIII
O!rTH
I!L.I!Y CATA l 0 c!
Ill lt
Ill ll
1270
Ill ll
IU ll
111
11Jo
-111
,.,
111 ll
,., ll
1 as ll
1120
H
111
H
115 Jl
H
111 l&
H
111 ll
H
111 31
2110
H
111 ll
H
111 31
H
1&5
H
111 31
2310
H
115 ll
H
111 31
H
us 3&
H
111 3&
H
111 31
2710
H
IS 12W 11 81XIY A 11'2
CONTINI!NTAL Ot&.
0&·0:17•0117&•00
SS I:ZW 11 IJllCIY A .f3
CONTI N!NTAL D IL
0&·037 .. 0&11S•OO
IS 12W 11 IJXIY A #S.
CONTINI!NTAL OIL
0&•037~011'71•00
SS 12W It llXIY A •&
CONTININTAL OIL
0&•037•01111•00
IS' I:ZW 11 IIXIY & •1
CONT!NINTAL OIL
0&•037•01112•00
IS I 2W 1 1 I I X I Y A _.. 1 0
CDNTIN!NTAL OIL
o•·Ol7•01113•00
!J $ 1 2W 1 1 I l X I Y A of 1 1
CONTINeNTAL OlL
oot-037·olt14·oo
55 12W 11 IIIXBY A •tot
CONTIH!NTAL OIL
04•03'7•0111'7•00
IS 1:ZW II IIXI'f A 111
CONTININTAL OIL
04•037•01168•00
SS 12W 11 IIXIY A .ttl
CONTIN!NTAL OIL
04•03'7•01111•01
SS 12W II IIIXIY A 1'17
CDNTININTAL OIL
0&•037•01,.0•00
ss 12w 11 azxev A •11
CONTININTAL DIL
o•·o37·0it11·0o
SS 12._.., 11 IIXI'I" A •11
CDNOCO
04•037•01112•00
51 12W 11 IIXIY A •11
CONTIN!NTAL OIL
0&•03'7•01112•01
SS 12W II llJII' A •20
CDNTIN!NTAL OIL
06 .. 037•01113•00
SS 12W 11 llXIY A •21
CONTIN!NTAL OIL
o• .. o37·0IIt•·oo
SS 12W 11 IIXI'i A 1'23
ss.
CONTININTAL OIL
o•·037•01111·00
1:ZW 11 IJlXIY A •21
CDNTIN!NTAL OIL
Olll•037•0itii•OO
IS 12W 11 IIXIY A 1tll
CONTIN!NTAL OIL
06•0l'T•OIIII•OO
IS IZW 11 IIXIY A •27
CONTINENTAL OIL
35•037·07000•01
!IS 12W 11 llXIY A .-21
CONTII"f~HTAL OIL
0&•037•07002•00
IS I :ZW 1 1 I 1 X I Y & _.. 3 I
CONTIN!NTAL OIL
O&•Ol7•070011l•OO
IS t:ZW 11 IIXIY A Mll
CONTIN!NTAL OIL
04•037•07001•01
IS 12W 11 11XIY' A •JI
CDNTININTAL OIL
o•·o:s7 .. 07ooa•oo
SS l:ZW 11 llXIY A •li
CONTIN!NTAL OIL
Olll•Ol7•0100I•OO
01/0"/21 DATA !
1,131 HIST OTHJI
110P' COitl
11/11/21 DATA
1,313 HIST •&
ID~
Oot/OI/27 DATA I
1,!11 HIST
...
02/23/27 DATA 1!
1,101 HIST
10~
Ol/10/27 DATA
1,110 HilT
lD~
04/11/27 DATA
I, 100 HIST
1011' COitl
01/11/27 DATA
1,01!1 HIST
ao~ co•1
0&/21/21 OAU ...
l,lll HIST
6D~ CDRI
Ol/l0/Z7 DATA I
I, &73 HUT
ao~ co••
Ol/11/27 DATA II
&,201 HIST I
101" CORE
05/:Z0/27 DATA
4,150 HlST
!01' COR!
Ol/03/2'7 OATA
1,100 HIST
too;r coJte
DATA. ACMT
4, SOl HIST QTHJt
I~L
01/16127 HTA I
., 190 HCST
1001" CORI
07/01/:ZI DATA !
1,055 Hi:ST
1001' CCIII:I!
07/01/21 CATA I
I, 130 HlST
101' CORE
09/20/:1 OATA kA
S, ISS HIST
&01' CDRI!
01/21/21 Cl:.T~ E
S, 135 HIST
ID~
03/26/29 DATA
S,UOHIST
10~
06/01/77 DATA te
&,333 HIST
t2CL ca•e
t0/1l/21 :lATA !.
&,110 HlST
lOCI"
1 t/21/21 DATA !
5,,11 HlST
1001' CO~I!
07/10/34 DATA !
I,,JO HIST RA
ID~ COO<!
DATA RA
10,210 HlST
1011' CQ~I!
01/ll/JS DATA I!
7.711 H!ST ACMT
10011'" COR!! OTHJt
1 ,L!AS~ NA~! AND NUMBE~ COMPL!T!D 1 .L!ASI! HAM! AND HU~k!lt CD~'L!TI!~ CART S!C 2, OPIU~ATOR O!PTH CAftT S!C %,0,!RATOR O!,TM
CAT LOC TWII RNC J,APIW !L!V DATA LDCS OAT ~OC TW~ RNC 3,A,l• !L!V DATA LOCS Ill Jl
Ill 31
H
111 ~I
H
111 31
3020
H
SS 12W 11 IIXIY A "l7
CONTIN~NTA~ 01~
04•037•07010•00
IS 12W 11 IIXIY A NJg
CONTININTA~ OIL
06•037•0'7012•00
IS 12W It IIXIY A •tt
CDNTININTAL· OIL
04•037•0'7014•00
I£ 1ZW 11 IIXIY A •42
CONTIN!NTA~ OIL
0.&•037•07011•00
111 31 SS IZW 11 IIXIY A '43
3030 CONTININTA~ 01~
H 04•037•0701.•00
Ill 31
H
111 31
H
liS 3&
H
111 l&
H
1 as 3&
3310
H
/""\
115~
H
1 ., ll
H
115 ll
l&IO
H
ID 31
50 H
I If ~I
..
H
II 0
H
I U
H
H
1 a 1 l&
H
I> I
lao'
"
1 a • ll
H
111 l&
"
I U
H
IS 12W111IXIY& W4.&
CONTIN!NTA~ 01~
0.&•037•07017•00
IS 12W 11 IIXIY A N41
CONT!N~NTA~ OIL
OC•037•07021•01
IS 12W 11 IIXIY A •13
CONTIN~NTA~ 01~
0.&•037'•07131•00
IS 12:W 11 IIXIY A .fl.&
CONTININTA~ OIL
04•0l7•0'7131•00
SS 12W 11 IIXIY A Nil
CONTIN!NTA~ 01~
O.&•O:J7•07131•00
SS IZW 11 IIXI!'f' A •11
CONTINI!PJTAL OIL
04•037•07140·00
SS 12W 11 SIXI'i A "72
CONTIN!NTA~ 01~
04·0:17·07113•00:
SS 12~ II ~IXIY ~ •IO
CONTIN!NTAL 01~
04•037•0714f•OO
SS 12W 11 BRYANT •t
GETTY
04•037•01511•01
liS 12W 11 IR.YANT Ml
HE~LMAN EST.>TE
04 .. 051•0'7017•00
IS 12W 11 BRYANT _.1
SH!L~
0.&•037•07110•00
liS t2W 11 BRYI.NT N2
CETTY
04•0l'7•01SU•OO
IS 12W 11 BRYANT •2
5$
••
S H!L ~
C4•0l7•0'7UI•OO
12W 11 BRYANT
t2W 11
C!TTY
0&"037•01'111•00
BRYANT
GETTY
0&•03'7•01511•00
•4
55 12W 11 BRYANT 114
SHEL ~
04•C3'7•0'7ttJ•OO
SS 12W 11 IA.YANT •I
C!TTY
0.4•037•01170•00
IS ~ZW 11 BRYANT M5H
C!TTY
0.&•037•01114•00
SS 12W 11 SRYAHT .ff'l
C!TTY
0£"'037•01171•00
11/27/JS OAT&!. "A
1,400 MIST
100~ C,R!
10/11/JI DATA I
1,4.&1 HIST
10,.. co-a
02/:Zl/Ji DATA I[
1,300 HIST
I 1 Dfl'
03/0:Z/71 DATA !
7,130 HIST ~A
10, CO~!
OS/11/40 DATA I
1,110 HIST N
120' CO~I CU4T
OTH ..
11/:ZJ/40 DATA I
ttl lC
620
H
1 I I J I
H
,., ].1
"
1 I' ll
I I I ll
H
Ill ll
1,233 HIST A:A ..-
12DP' COJtE DTH.
01/07/41 DATA !
7,730 HIST
140,.
02/22/53 DATA !
111
160
H
Ill Jl
10,211 'HlST ItA H
4KI
1 a • 31
05/01/53 DATA H
IO,IIOHISTI "
IIC~ ~A
co" ,., ll
11/25/57 DATA
10,100 HlST
IKI
OTHII
12/11/Sl DATA IE
1,300 MIST I!
IKII RA
01/12/11 DATA
1,110 HIST
SKI
04/04/,7 O"'TA 1.1
7,771 HIST
IKI
12/14/2' DATA II
5,4U HIST
130, CO~!
02/11/ol'J CAT&
1,250 HIST
110,
01/10/2o\ DATA
4, 020 HIST
130,
04/IJ/27 DATA
4,103 HIST
120'
DATA
6,1H HIST
10'
04/11/27 DATA
1,143 HIST
liD, CO~!
0.&/23/27 DATA 1.1
1,140 HIST RA
120' COR!
DATA
4,117 HIST
120,
04/J0/27 DATA U
.,144 HJST
IJD' COlt!
01/ll/44 DATA II
7,&41 HIST !
liD' COR!
Ol/23/27 DATA
1,104 HIST
liD' CO~!
H
111 31
1%10
..
11i 31
H
11, ll
H
111 :II
H
111 ll
H
,.,
1110
H
1&1 J&
H
,,, l&
H
111 Jl
H
111 31
"
Ill ll
H
,., 31
H
,,, 31
.1130
H
SS I~W 11 I,_YAJ.tT WI
SHIL ~
04•037•0'71ti•00
IS 12W 11 I!IJitY.ANT 111
C f TTY
0.& .. 037•01172•01
IS 12W 11 IIJtYANT 117
SHILL
04•0:S1 .. 07tti•OO
IS 1ZW 11 IRfANT 111
SH!L~.
04•037•0'7tt7•00
IS I:ZW II llltYANT 1110
C!TTY
06•031•011'J'l:•OO
IS 12W 11 BRYANT NIO
SH!L~
04•031•0'79ti•OO
IS 12W 11 IAY&NT •11
C!TTY
04•037•01S'7&•00
IS 12W 11 !RYANT •11
SH!L~
0.&•031•01000•00
IS 12W 11 IJtYANT lfl2
C~TTY
0&•037•01171•00
II 12W 1 t IRYANT •tl
C!TTY
0&•027• tiiO:t•OO
IS 12W 11 IIII:YANT WI&
CITTY
04•037•11103 .. 00
IS 1:ZW 11 lf':YANT Wtl
CITTY
o•·o:s7·taa1a-oo
SS 12W 11 IIII:YANT •t•
GETTY
01 ·O:IT• 11101•01
IS 12W 1 I lill:f.ANT 1111
C!TTY
04•037•11101•00
IS 12W 11 JRYANT 1111
TUACO
0.&•03'1•11101•00
IS 12W II IIIU&NT *21
cnn
o.&·Ol7•11IOI•OO
SS 12W 11 BftYANT 1122
C!TTY
0&•037•11107•00
SS 1lW It IRYANT •23
CITTY
04•03'7•11&01•00
IS 12W II I~YANT •24
IS
.u
C!TTY
04•0l7•1&101•00
12W 1 I BRYANT
T!XACO
0&•037•11101•00
12W 11 IJtYANT
C~TTY
06•03'7•11&10•00
5S IZW 11 lltYANT •21
C!TTY
04•037•11111•00
IS 12W 11 IRYANT 1'27
C~TTY
04•0l'7•11112•00
IS 12W 11 IRYANT 1121
CITTY
04•037 .. 1111::1•00
SS 12W 11 IR.YANT •21
C!TTY
o• .. o31 .. 1&&1•·oo
01/21/65 OAT"- E
t,ftl HtST
15011' CCit.l!
01/24/40 DATA Ie
,,l4l HtST I
1301' COit.l
01/20/41 DATA I
&,tOO HJST
tiC,. CCJtl
04/13/31 DATA I!
1,e:aa HtST
liD' COlt!
DATA 11
'J',ASO HIST
13011' co-.e:
04/12/41 DATA I
I, 131 HlST
140,
0"7/11/27 DATA
S. It I HlST
1301' CORI!
12/23/51 DATA II
I ,310 HIST I
110' CO~! C~N
0'/10/ZI DATA II
'7,110 HIST I
110' CO~!
01/01/21 DATA
1,411 HilT
110' CO~!
07/:Z0/35 OAT.lt. !
1,140 HIST ItA
tltiL co••
01/21/45 DATA E
7, 422 HIST ~A
tiD~
07/~~~~~ ~~~~ ~·
ISO'
100
OS/27/21 DATA .........
I, 540 HIST
1 .&011' COlt!
DATA -....,.
l,tOO HIST
llO' co~ 1
10/21/44 DATA~
7,'710 HIST
uc~
01/11/5& DATA i--
1 j !~~ H liT ACCI
DATA
1,21l
01/0'7/11 DATA
I, 114 HUT
10011'
06/01/51 DATA
l,lOO HIST
10,
-
01/11/71 DATA II.
I, 100 HIST AC~
tiCL CAT& I
HUT OT-l
OAU II
I,JCO HIST
1001"
DATA .li:CI
7,'700 MIST &CCI
7 C!JIT
HilT
I.~~AS~ ~AM! AND NUMII~ CO~~L!T~D
CART S!C l,OP!RATOR OEPTH
OAT LOC: TW, R:HG
111 31 II 1lW 11 llllY&NT -30
C:!TTY
H 0&•031• 111115•00
I!:~!V OATA LOCS
01/ 11/1'7 CATA I
1,'111 HlST
'
__ )~1"'•"",,....,3~.=---:,c:,,--1,..2::,.=---:-1-:-1-:I-:R~v"=•:-:N;-;T;-------::;.;;3;;1;---;;o<•7t"'i1"'ili:t;:2;"7;-;;o 4"A'TT4"Ais- cerrv s.•oo HIST
H 04•037•11111•00 120,- COil!
111 31
H
111 J&
H
111 31
H
111 31
H
111 31
H
111 31
2110
H
111 31
3110
H
1" 31
IS 12W 11 I.YANT •32
C!TTY
04•037·003.0•00
SS 12W 11 llltY.&NT •ll
C!TTY
04•037•11111•00
5S 12W 11 lltYUH .t'l&
C!TTY
0··037•11117•00
SS 12W 1\ I~YANT •:tl
C!TTY
01•03'7•0&311•00
IS 12W 11 lllllYANT •:aa
ss
ss
IS
CI!:TTY
01•037•00111•00
12W 11 IA.YANT ,-CUlt
SHELL
04•0:17•0111&•00
12W 11 IA:YANT LW
CITTY
0··0:17•01111'"00
12W 11 lltYANT LW
•1
•1
OATA II
15,173 HIST
IKI
01/11/13 DATA II
7,100 HIST I
20KI
DATA II
'1,130 HIST
ICl
Ol/00/11 DATA Jl
1,.310 HJST
ICl
DATA II
1,'750 HIST
tel
01/11/52 DATI
10, "2 HIST
1 10~ cou
01/30/47 DATA
3,350 HIST
1 10~ cou
015/01/41 DATA I • •
1,210 HIST
. 110~
CETTY
04•02'7•0111&•00 H
~1~1~1~3~i~---:,c:S,-~1:-:2::W=-7171~H":!~L~L~M~A~N~--------~-~~~----~oos~/~1~3~/~I~Oo-noaATTAI-jJI' H
HELLMAN !STAT! 1,030 HIST I 1 04•01t•OA211•00 4CL CO!Itl! DH 1 ~~· 31
H
111 ll
• H
"jj"i" Jl
2430
5S
ss
55 55
12W 11 H!L.L~AH
H!LLMAN !STAT!
04•011•01214•00
12W 11 HELLMAN
H!LLMU !STATE
01·0•11·04:'.51•01
1 12W 11 ~~~~~::N~~~~~~~
oa-os•·2o:it·oo
1%~ 11 H!LLMAN UNIT
H!LLMAN I!STAT!
04•051•04&51•00
• 1
01/00/71 DATA
1,117 H!ST
con
02/20/10 DATI
&,011 HIST
CCL
02/23/lt DATA 11
1,200 Hl5T
ICL
0&/1•/,& DATA
10,007 MIST
ICL
07/1&/i& DATA .t!
1,132 HlST
•cL
·-------_--~S~S;---;-1~2W=-~1~1~H~~~L-,~M~A~H~W~~~-----,;,1------CO).C~/Ti1ti7/770I-=0~A~T~A.----- j"'l H!L.L~AN !STAT! 7:1 HIJT
12W I 1 HILLMAN UNlT
CONTIN~NTAL OIL
o•-ost~ot.SS2·oo
0&•037•20117·00 ICL
5S
1U ss
1U 55
t:ZW 11 H!LLMAH w W
H!LLMAN !STAT!
04•051•071 12•00
:w 1 I J
HILLMAN !ST
04•0St•041Il•01
020
til :31 SS 12W 11 R.ANC:HD •1
J7l0 AS~HALT PITRO
0&•037·01114 .. 00
111 ll 5S 12'1¥ 11 SAN GAIRIRL .t4
1U
Ill
1U
2710
' I
/
SO CH!VRON USA
04•031•0&4J3•00
SS llW 11 SAN CAIR[I\. f'11
CH!VROH. USA
o•·OJ7•01SOO•OO
SS 12~ I 1 SAN CAI.l!L •1Z
CH!VJII:OH USA.
o4--037•0I52&·oo
55 1ZW 11 SAN C~BRl!L •17
CH!:VJII:ON USA.
0&·037•01532·00
DATA
70 HIS T
ICL
11/22/11 OATA
I, 131 HIST
CCL
12/02/27 CATA
S,Clc HIST
120~ COlt!
02/03/&0 OAT4 &
1,1SIHIST
120~
01/J0/27 OATA !
.,CI7 HIST ItA
11 0~
11/05/27 CATA
1,071 HIST
100~
01/10/27 OATA
1,372 HIST
12011'
12/27/21 DATA
s. 137 H!ST
1001'
CART 1 .L!AS! NAME AND HU~II- COM~LET!O
OAT LOC TW' ~NC
SIC 2. 0'1!"ATQI!l :J!~TH
l.APl• EI.EV O.&TA LO:s
"'
111
111
Ill 31
116 ll
2020
N
iii lt
111
, .. lt
-
1&1 H
111 3t
Ill Jt
IAI Jt
H
IIi ll
111 3t
H
116 31
111
H
111 JJ
H
,., 31
H
1 I I :J I
3,10
H
IS 12W I I SAN CAIIIllEI. •20
CH!Y"o-.. USA
04·037•01131•00
IS I%W 11 SAN CAIRI!L •22
CH!YA.ON US.&
O&•Ol7·0&Sl'T·OO
SS 12W 11 SAN CAIIU!L •2•
C:HIYitDN USA
o•·o37·0IIlt•oo
IS 12W 11 SAH CAIRIEL •11
CHI!VA:ON USA
04•0l7·oas••·oo
SS 12W 11 STAT! PlltC: 111 •1
I!XXDN
04•2SI•O'TII&ooQQ
5S 12W 11 STAT! PltC Ill •210
lXX ON
0&•211•071ti•OO
ss 12'111' 12 _,
IS
IS
..
IS
ss
55 ss
ss
u
H!LL~AN ISTATI
04•011•00011·00
12W 12
HilLMAN !STATI
cr•-o•t·OI211·oo
1 2W 12
Hll LMAN IS UTI
OC•OII•OC211•00
12W 12
12W 12
12W 12
12., 12
I:ZW 12
t 2'N 1 2
I:ZW 12
12W 12
12" 12
HILLMAN ISUTI
OC•OII•OC210•00
HELLMAN I!STATI
01·011•0421'7•00
H!L LMAN IS UTI
04•0SI•042&J•OO
HtL LMAN IS rAT I
OC•Oit•OC271•00
H~LLMAN !STATI
04•011•0411A•OO
HILLMAN fSTAT!
04·051•04&51•00
HILLMAN .!STATI
04·ost .. o•&sl·oo
H!L LMAN !STATI
04•051•0&1&'7•00
HILLMAN ISTATI
04•051•0&110•00
H!LL"IN !STAT!
04•011•04111•00
...
•11
•27
IS 12W 12 •l%
SS 12W 12
HILLMAN !ST.o.TI
OI•Oit•OIII2•00
HILLMAN !STATI
o•·OII•04112•02
SS IZW 12 •ll
HILLMAN ISTATI
04•011•0&113•00
IS 12W 12 *l4
. H!LL .. AN !STATI
04•011•04&11•00
IS 12W 12 •ll
HH~MAN !STATI
o•·OSI•O&I&S•OO
01/21/ZJ DATA
1,371 HIJT
100 ...
Ol/11/21 OAT&
I, 3 13 H'IS T
10Qjr
03/1'7/l. DATA
I •• "Pt MIST
10~
10/13/11 DATA
10,270 HIST
2001"
D4TA I!
1,010 HIST ItA
02/21/10 OATA II
12,131 HIST I
ICl CDltl
10/0f/21 OATA
S,742 HIST
CIDfl'
07/30/U DATA I
I, 112 HIST
12D~
01/21/U DATA I
7,11C HilT
1401'
OI/27/U DATA
1,1tl HilT
120~
Ot/11/12 DATA I
I,UO HIST
120,
02/10/•7 DATA!
I,IC2 HIST
140,- COR!
04/05/47 DATA a
7,047 lUST
tt COitl
01/25/&7 OAT.\
t,OOI HlS'T
140' SMPL
05/20/11 DATA
S, I 10 HIST
IIC~
02/24/.tl DATA I
1,503 HIST.
14011'
0&/ 11/&1 DATA !
1,021 HlST
140JI'
&,011
3CL
02/01/&1 DATA
1,711 HIST
17KI
Ol/27/&1 CAT4
1,0•1 HIST
171CI
0 l LL
02/ZI,'It DATA .!
a.4J•·H!ST
ICL
1 .l!AS! HA~E AND HUM~!~ COM~l!T!D
CAI':T SEC 7.C,!AATOA DtrTH
C4T LCC TW~ "HC I!I.!Y DATA lOCS
117 :It
( so
-./
117 31
II '1 3 I
117 31
117 ll
H
117 31
H
117 31
H
117 31
117 31
H
117 ll
H
1&7 ll
l40
H
117 31
H
117 31
H
117 ll
H
117 :SI
H
117 Jl
ta7 :a
1&7 H
117 3J
1&7 l8
H
117 ll
H
I 11 ll
CIO
H
I S7 li
IS 12W ll -~~
HeLllo4AN !STATI
04·05t•OAIII•OO
IS 12W 12 •:JI
H~I.Lfo4&N !STATI
04•0it•O&III•OO
SS llW 12 11'~1
Hai.I.~AN ISTATif
04•0SI•Otiii•OO
IS 12W 1% •40
HI!LI.MAN !~TATR
04•051•0&170•00
SS 12W I 2 • 4 I
Hllllo4AN ESTATE
04•0II•Otl71•02
IS tlW 12 1'&3
HWLLfroi!AN EST&Ta
O&•OSI-0&173•00
IS 12W 12 •41
HRt.I.MAN I!ST&Ta
0&•051-0&171•00
IS 12W 12 •&I
H!lllo4AN UTATI
Oa•OI1•07001•00
SS 12W 12 ••7
HEllMAN ISTATI
0&•051•07002-00
Sl 12111 12 .41
Hl!lllo4AN ISTATI
04•0SI•0700J•OO
IS 12111 12 •11
Ht:lllo4AN UTATI
0&•011•0'7001•00
SS 12111 12 •12
HI!LlMAN UTATI
04•051•0'7007•00
IS 12111 12 •IJ
HI! l LMAN UTATI
04•011-01001•00
ss 12111 12 •14
Hllllo4AN !STATE
04•051•07001•00
IS 11111 12 •51
H!lllo4AN ISTATI
0&•011•07010•00
IS 12W 12 *II
ss
5S
IS
IS
ss
12W 12
12W 12
12W 12
HI!I.LMAH !STAT!
04•05,•07011•00
HI!I.Lfroi!AN !'STAT!
04•0SI·0'7012'"00
Hl!lllo4AN !STAT!
04•0C9•0'7013•00
HCLI.to4AN !STAT!
Ot•0£1·07014•00
12W 12 HEi.I.Jro4AN •&2
H!lllo4AN !STAT!
O&•OSI•Otl72•00
12W 12 KI!LLMAN ,,.
H~I.I.MAN 1",_01"
04•011•21210•00
12W 12 NJI!TO lf'l
UHIDN Oil 01" CAlli"
0& .. 011•0,112•00
12W IJ ALAMITOS
~cu D~l!l!.
04 .. 051•01171•00
•I
"2W 13 ALAMITOS ~%
RCU D'~R
04 .. 011•01177•00
12·N 13 ALAMITOS •l
ocu DPf~
04•011•01171•00
OS/2&/41 DATA a
1,110 H[ST
liKI
02/11/SO DATA a
l,tt2 HIST
171(1
04/02/50 DATA !
l,fJ4 HIST
17KI
02/00/,0 OATA 1!:
I, 110 HJST
171(1
12!0,/1 1 DATA !
l,tll HIST
CCL
01/1,/51 DATA
1,110 HIST
IIKI
01/01/51 DATA £
A,lll HIST
IIKI
01/01/S% DATA I!
1,113 HIST
11KI
Ol/Ol/52 DATA I
a,an HIST
15KI
DS/01/52 DATA ll
a, 110 HIST I!
11KI
DATA I!
1,522 HI~T
S2KI
OJ/11/U DATA I!
&,ISO HIST
l7CI"
OS/01/51 CATA E
l,lll HIST
1201"
01/20/57 OLTA E
1,140 HIST
•2CL
02/25/57 DATA !
&,711 HIST
37 c l
01/11/17 DATA
&,117 HIST
l7Cl
OI/OV/'1 DATA !.
a, '00 HlST
40C:L
02/10/&& DATA I
&,775 HIST
J7CL
Ol/23/11 DATA IE
1,141 HIST SONC
1401" CIMT
07/27/7& DATA IE
1,121 HJST !
DILL
1,234 Dill
OS/02/:1 DATA R
7,101 HIST
15 12/ll/SC DATA
1,171 HIST
20KI
OC/2l/SI DATA E
1,112 HIST
20KI
DJ/O'T/51 DATA !
I, Ul H 1ST
20KI
1.L!AS! NAM! AND HUM!!~ CDMfi'L!T!D
CAIItT SEC 2.011'EI':ATO~ O!~TH
OAT LOC TWJI' I':HC
117 lt
117 31
IS 12W 13 AL~MITOS •&
1\CU Oll'!llt
O&•O,·t·OIJ'11"'0f
IS 12W 13 ALAMITOS •1
ltCU OP'!IIt
Ot•Oiit•OitiO·OO
117 ll 'S 12W 13 AL.C.MlTOS .. ,
1!0 '-CU DP!IIt
H Ot•C»t·OIIII•01
1 11 :n
117 31
H
117 31
H
,., 31
uo
H
117 ll
H ,
117 :Jt
H
1&7 ll
H
117 31
117 31
H
117 !I
H
1 17 31
1&7 ll
1210
H
117 31
H
111 31
H
11'7 31
H
117 ••
H
111 31
H
117 31
H
117 ll
H
117 31
117
1110
H
IS 12W 1l 41..1-.MITOS •7
RCU 0'!R
0.&•011•01112"00
IS 12W 13 ALAJo4ITDS •1
lltCU Ottt!A
Ot .. OSI•tiiii~·OO
IS 12W 13 ALAMITOS Ml
RCL.' 0'!R
o•·OII•OIII.•OO
IS. 12W' IJ ALA""ITDS •to
•e u ·o, I!R
o4-oii•Oita•·oo
SS t2W 1~ ALAMITOS 11PI1
ocu 0,1!.
04•011 .. 01111"'00
IS 12W 1~ ALAMITOS •12
~cu D~U
o••OII•OIII,•OO
IS 12W 13 ALAMITOS •tl
ACU D~EI!.
04•0it•OIIII•OO
SiS 12W IJ ALAMITOS lf'14
OCU O~fA
04•011•0ltAI•OO
IS 12W 13 ALAMITOS •11
lltCU 0'1!11t
04•011•0&110•00
IS t:ZW 1l ALAMITOS •11
ACU D,EI!.
04•011"'01111•00
II :zw 13 ALAMITOS •11
~cu D~E•
OC•OII•OI112•00
IS 12W 13 &L.AfriUTDS •tl
-I:CU 0'!111
o•·OII•OI112•00
IS 12W 13 ALA!otiTDS •It
IS
&S
ss
5S
55 IS
55 ACU D~EA
04•('111•01114•00
12111 ll AlAMITOS
RCU Ott!Jt
04•011•01111•00
12W 13 ALAMITOS
RCU D~l!~
OC•OSI•OIIII•OO
t2W 13 ALAMITOS
~cu c~u
OC•051•0U17•00
12W 13 ALAMITOS
RCU D,EA
Ot•Oit•OIIII•OO
12W 13 ALAMITOS
JtCU Clllllt
01&•011·015111•00
12111 ll AlAio41TOS
~cu o,u
o•·olt•o'1ooo-oo
12W U AlAio41TCS
ACU D,EA
04•011•01111•00
12W 13 ALAMITOS WW
~cu o~u
o4·ost-2oat•·oo
•22
•2l
•24
•21
ll!Y OITA LOCI
OS/21/11 CITA I
1,201 HJST
20KI
01/01/10 DATA !
1,430 HlST
20KI
12/J0/11 DATA 1!:
1,&10 "ilST
ICl
01/1,/SS: DATAl
1,421 HlST
201(1
01/22/15 DATA E
1,240 HJST
20KI
10/13/SI DATA !
l,tl1 HIST
:ZOKI
12/01/11 DATA !
1.111 HIST
20KI
01/00/17 DATA l
1,110 HIST
201(1
02/02/11 DATA
1,321 HIST CAN
201(1
02/21/11 DATA
1,702 HIST
20KI
10/00/13 DATA E
1,721 HIST
20KI DATA
HIST
04/11/11 D&T.:l E
7,100 HIST
20KI
01/11/11 DATA !
&,211 HIST
201(1
o•/21/11 DATA E
&,411 H!ST
20KI
07/10/51 DATA
I,Ttl HIST
20KI CD"-E
01/04/51 OATA
&,211 HIST
20KI
01/ll/11 DATA
1,330 HlST
20KI
10/01/5, CATA
&,221 HIST
20KI
11/01/11 DATA
1,273 HIST
20KI HIST
12/11/11 DATA!,
I, Hl HlST
:ZOIC I
0&/01/17 CAT& l
&,011 HIST
201(1
OS/00/12 DATA
1,221 HlST
20KI
12/0C/1& OATA
1,111 HIST
20KI
05/Cl/75 DATA
U HIST
awL
1 .~!AS! NA~! AND NU~I!. COM~~E~ED 1 .~!AS! NAMI! ANC NUMI!. COM~~I!T!O SIC 2.0~!-ATO~ O!,TH CART S!C 2.CP!RA~O· O!,TH CA•T
CAT ~CG TW~ -NG J.A~I• !~!V OAT& ~OCS OAT ~OC TW~ •NC l.A~[· EL!V DATA ~OCS 2 (,
IS 12W 07 A lf71tl
TMUMS LONC I!ACH
Ot·037·00IIO•Ot
01/'Zt/11 OATA
5,.&75 HIST
IIGL \ .
~--~----~.~S~~I~2~W~0~7~A~-----------------~~~2~1--------------00°A~T·A~I~I;-- 2 2
2 2
THUMS LONC I!ACH 1,215 HIST I!
ot•037·23&22·00 11CL
SS 12W 07 A. • .,SIJ
THUMS I.ONC:Z B!AC:H
ot·Ol7•2Jl2t·oo
SS 12W 01 A MilS
THUMS LCNC III!ACH
0.&•2J7·20.&IJ2•01
IS 12W 01 I •2tt
THUMS LONG III!ACH
0&·037•22700"'00
5$ 12W 01 I •lOti
THUMS LONG I!ACH
o•·ZJ7·2ol&7·0t
SS 12W 01 II •3311
THUMS LONG lEACH
0&•237•22312·00
SS 12W 01 I •&til
THUMS LONC II!ACH
0.&·237•201*1•00
SS 12W 01 I •t07I
THUMS LONG UACH
0&•237•23123•00
SS 12W 01 I •1121
THUMS LONG IIACH
04·237•23051•00
SS 12W 01 I 1123
THU~S LONG II!ACH
0.&•237·20110•00
&S 12W 01 I •ll&
THUMS LONG lEACH
0&•237•20412•01
SS 12W 01 I •7511
THUMS LONG I!ACH
o•·237•%l32l•OO
SS I%W 01 I •7UI
THUMS LONG I!ACH
o•·037·22777·oo
SS 12W 01 I •1011
THUMS LONG I!ACH
o•·Ol7• 221 11-oo
SS tZW 01 8 11~11
THUMS LON!: •EACH
0.&•237•20027•00
SS 12W 11 ,41
H!L LMAN EST
SS 12W 11 C 11131
THUMI LONG IIACH
o•·23'T·22•1I•01
SS 12W II C 03121
THUMS LONG IIACH
o••2l7•20UI•01
SS 12W II C Ol21
THUMS LONG IIACH
o•·2l7•21.01•00
SS 12W II C 0&22
THUMS LONG IIACH
04·237•2142··00
SS 12W 11 C •111
THUMS LONG IIACH
o•·2l7•22111·oo·
SS 12W 11 C •7&41
THUMS LONG IIACH
o•·2.l7·2ll2I·Oo
IS 1 2W II C 0101 I
THUMS LONG lEACH
o•·2l7·202U ·01
ss 12w 17 o ••o•
THUMS LONG IIACH
o•·2l7·20712·01
!5S 12W 17 C 1•12
THUMS LONG IIACH
o•·237•2ono·o1
COR!
HIST
Ol/20/17 DATA
l,l57 HIST
IIGL
07/0I/11 DATA
l, .. 2HIST
IICL
05/10/11 CAT&
&,51& HlST
11CL
12/01/11 OATA
5,2.1 HIST
11C:L
OS/07/11 OATA
S, 172 HIST
!IGL
OAU. II
l, lSO H JIST IE
IICL LAT
OI/IS/11 OAT&
&,3,1 HlST
!ICL
07/11/11 DATA.
s,os1 HIST
IIGL
COlt I
07/01/IS DATA
t,OI~ KIST
IICL
02/21/17 OAT&
1,000 HUT
IIGL
02/01/IS DATA
3,124 HUT
!ICL
01/01/ll OATA
10,107 HIST
ICL
OATA
ot,IO:I HilT
DATA
I, 141 HIST
OS/21/IS OAT&
I, 417 HIST
1SGL
DATA
4,013 HIST
11GL
11/23/11 DATA
•. 721 KIST
17CL
01/07/11 DATA
3,711 HUT
1'TGL
3' 177
tiC~
10/ll/11 OAT&
3,741 HUT
!IGL
01/11/IS OATA
S,071 KIST
11CL CORI
2 l
l
l
3 l
l
l
3 l
3 3
3 l
l
3 3
2 SS 12W 17 0 •SlOI
THU .. S LONG IIACH
04•237-22871•00
SS 12W 17_0 1tiOII
THUMS ~01111: II.&CH
04•237·20133•00
SS 12W 17 0 •A21
THUMS LONG I!ACH
04•237·23&44•00
SS IZW 17 0 #144
THUMS L.ONC lEACH
04•237•234&0•00
SS 12W 22 STATE "ltC 111 .f10S
!XXCN
04•251•002.1•01
IS 12W 22 STAT! ~-C 111 •ttl
!XXON
04•2SI•002SI•OO
SS 12W 22 STATI ,.C 111 •t21
THUMI LONG lEACH
04·251•002.1•00
SS 12W 22 STAT! ,.C 111 •t24
EXXON
04•%11•00214•00
SS 12W 22 STATE lOIS •222
CHIYitON USA
04•211•00302•00
SS 12W 22 STATE lOIS •223
CKIYtltON USA
o•·2SI•20003•00
SS 12W 22 STAT! 30tl 1324
CHEYitoN USA
04•251•20221•00
SS 12W 22 STATI lOIS 1321
CKIYtltON USA
o•·2SI•20012•00
SS 12W 22 STATE lOll o327
CHIYRON USA
o•·2SI•0027••oo
SS 12W 22 STATE lOIS 0221
CKEYtltON USA
o••21t•002IO•OO
IS 12W 22 STATI lOIS U2'3
CHIY-ON USA
o•·2SI•200T'7•00
SS 12W 22 STATE 3011 o•21
CH!VItON USA
o•·2St·2oz•s·oo
Sl 12W 22 STATE lOIS o•27
CHEYitON USA
Ot•21t•20243•00
IS 12W 22 STATI 3015 o•21
CHIVRON us•
04•%51•%0011•00
SS 12W 22 STATI 3011 o•zo
CHIYRON us•
o•·21t•20273•0o
IS 13W 01 '"- "403
~OWIRLINE OH
o•·237·01217·0o
SS 13W 01 Jl'lll 1&01
~Ow!RLINI on
01•237•01427•00
IS 13W 01 '"- -'401
~Dw!R~INI OIL
o•·237•0U21·oo
SS 13W 02 A W20
~oweRLINI on
04•237•01011•00
IS 13W 02 ,I Wl04
LIOD
04•237•02112•00
as 12w o2 ,z w1·2o
LIOD
o•·227·02212;01
SS 13W 02 LACJ<CD I w1•
CHEVItON USA
o•·027•022U·OO
01/11/11 OAT&
I, %20 HIST
IIGL
01/11/11 OATA
5,000 HIST
IICL
12/11/11 QATA II!
1,014 HlST II
IIGL II
II
11/tl/11 DATA OILL
.&,Oil MIST DILL
IICL N
OS/00/77 DATA
3,'127 HlST
02/21/16 DATA
l,l&l HIST
OS/00/11 DATA
l, 711 H!ST
0'1/00/71 DATA
1,073 HIST
01/27/17 DATA
I,U% HIST
DATA
1,110 HIST
DATA
,,ISS HIST
DATA
07/ll/17 OATA
1,1.1 HIST
03/23/ll OATA
HIST
01/11/17 OAT&
7,121 HIST
DATA
1,170
01/01/11 oATA
4,110 HIST
01/22/17 DATA
1,170 HIST
03/2l/12 OATA
1,%71 HIST
OATA
HIST
DATA
3,700 HIST
OATA
l, 170 HIST
01/21/17 OAT&
2,713 HilT
OAT&
4, 30:1. HIST
Ol/2l/1. DATA
l, 111 HIST
2lCL
Ol/2t/IS DATA
l, 121 HIST
N
1 L r AS! HIM I! ANO ~UMI(~ CO..,HO!D CART SEC 2,0,1!-.ATOP. O!,TH OAT LOC Tw• ••c l, A .. J" !L IV :lATA LOCS 1 I 7 31 IS 12W 13 CITY o• SEAl. O!A • 1 01/11/57 CATA I "- H!LLM&N UTAT! 1,700 HlST
i
04•011•01171•00 :i:4C1. COJll!
1 I 7 31 u 12W u Cl TY a• seAL lEA •2 01/23/57 DATA I
HI!LLMAN !STAT! I, 100 HIST
H 04•011•01110•00 24CL co•!
u 12W 13 ~ ..... II
THUMI LONC 11!41:H I. 52 I II
04•2:17•2:1104•00 tiCL
117 lt IS 12W 13 ~ ,,,, 01/01/13 HlST II
THUMS LONC IEAC" & ' & I I
04·237-22112•00 IICL
117 IS 12W 14 •1 DATA
H • DAIN!Y co 3,057 HIST
H 04•011•00114•00 lo•
117 IS 12W 14 •1 DATA
SEAL lEACH OIL I, 110 H 1ST
H o•·olt·01122·oo 40011'
117 ss 12W 14 Sl
""
Ol/14/21 DATA
If
CETTY 1,111 HIST
04•011•00114•00 ll CDR I!
(01) IE DUAL INDUCTION
FIELD PRINT
IES/DIL COMPOSITE
INDUCTION
INQUCTION ELECTRIC
LOG TYPES
INDUCTION ELECTRIC/LONG LATERAL
. I E
----
CO~IPOSITE LOG
COMPOSITE RESISTIVITY
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC FOR1·1ATION
ELECTRIC WELL LOG
ELECTRICAL ~URVEY
ELECTROLOG .,
ELECTRO MAGNETIC
ELECTRONIC PROPAGATION
(03) DILL COMPOSITED SIMULTANOUS DUAL LATERLOG
DILliES COMPOSITE
DUAL INDUCTION GUARD
(04)DUAL DUAL GUARD LOG
DUAL INDUCTION FOCUSED
FOCUSED LOG
( 05) INDG GMV'-tA INDUCT! ON
GAMMA RAY INDUCTION
( 06) I~LL FORXO
FORXO CALIPER
GMf1A FORXO LOG
MICRO GUARD
MICRO LATERLOG
INDUCTION NEUTRON
INDUCTION RESISTIVITY
INDUCTION SURVEY
ISF INDUCTION
SELF POTENTIAL CONDUCTIVITY
RESISTIVITY MICRO
SALT DOME PROFILING
SCHLMBERGER
SCHLMBERGER ELECTRIC LOG
SELF POTENTIAL RESISTIVITY
SINGLE POINT RESISTIVITY
WELL LOG
WELL SURVEY
DUAL INDUCTION LATERLOG
DUAL INDUCTION SFL
INDUCTION LATERLOG
INDUCTION FOCUS
SIMULTANEOUS DUEL LATERLOG
INDUCTION GAtvlMA
INDUCTION SFL
mCRO SFL
PROXIMITY
PROXIMITY MICROLOG
PROXIMITY- MICROLOG/CALIPER
PROXIMITY MINILOG
(07)LAT CALIPER GUARD LOG LATERLOG
COMPOSITE LATERLOG LATERLOG GAW>iA RAY
DUAL LATERLOG LATERLOG GAMMA RAY NEUTRON
DUAL LATERLOG/MICRO SFL LATERLOG LIMESTON
GUARD CALIPER LOG . LATEROLO(! CURVE & GAMMA RAY
GUARD FORXO LATEROLOG SURVEY
GUARD LOG
RESISTIVITY LATEROLOG GAMMA RAY NEUTRON CALIPER
SPHERICALLY FOCUSED LOG
(OS)MCAL CALIPER
CONTACT CALIPER
CONTINUOUS CALIPER
MICRO CONTACT CALIPER .
( 09) iUC CONTACT LOG
MICRO ELECTRICAL LOG
~1ICRO NEUTRON
/ MICRO RESISTIVITY
f·1I CRO SURVEY
MICRO RESISTIVITY CALIPER
MICROLOG CALIPER
MICROLOG RESISTIVITY
MICROLOG
MfCROLOG & GAMMA. RAY CURVE
MICROLOG LATEROLOG TRUMPET
TRUWET LOG
~\ ( 10)rHNI \, j MINIFOCUSED
~1IN ILCG
(11)MINC MINICALIPER
~1I:'HLOG CALIPER
(12)BCSG BOREHOLE COMPENSATED SONIC L,OG
BOREHOLE COMPENSATED SONIC LOG CALIPER
BOREHOLE COI~PENSATED SONIC LOG GAMMA RAY
BOREHOLE GEOMETRY
COMPOSITED BOREHOLE COMPENSATED SONIC LOG
( 13 )SGRC SONIC. GAM'v!A RAY CALIPER
( 14) SONG CORRELATION
GA~1r·1A RAY CORRELATION/SONIC CEMENT BOND
ISF/SONIC
SONIC AMPLITUDE
SONIC CEr'ENT BOND
(15) ACCB ACC SCOPE
ACOUSTIC
ACOUSTIC BOND/GAMMA RAY
. ACOUSTIC CALIPER
ACOUSTIC GAr11A CALIPER
ACOUSTILOG
SONIC CEMENT BOND SEISMIC SPECTRUi1
SONIC GAMMA RAY LUG
SONIC LOG
SONIC t1ICROLOG
DUAL & SINGLE RECEIVER ACOUSTIC
FRACTURE FINDER
FRACTURE FINDER MICRO-SEISMOGRAM
FRACTURE IDENTIFICATION
HICRO SEISMOGRAM
MICRO SEISMOGRAM-CASED HOLE
\, · At~PLITUDE LOG
AMPLITUDE SONIC
BHC ACOUSTILOG
• SEIS1IC SPECTRUM
( 16) ACCV
(17) GR
BOREHOLE COMPENSATED SONIC ACOUSTILOG
COMPENSATED AMPLITUDE
COMPENSATED SONIC
CGr·!PRESSU11AL AMPLITUDE
ACOUSTIC VELOCITY LOG
SIDEWALL ACOUSTIC NEUTRON LOG
SIGNATURE CURVE
SIGNATURE (OR HALF SIGNATURE) LOG
SONIC FORHATION AMPLITUDE LOG
VARIABLE DENSITY LOG
COMPENSATED ACOUSTIC VELOCITY GAMMA CALIPER LOG
COMPENSATED ACOUSTIC VELOCITY LOG
Cot1PENSATED ACOUSTIC VELOCITY MICRO-SEISMOGRAH LOG·
CONTINUOUS VELOCITY LOG
VELOCITY- LOG
3-D VELOCITY LOG
DRILL PIPE GAMMA RAY LOG
GAI1MA BOND
GAM·1A COLLAR
GAMMA COLLAR/PERF RECORD
GA/'1'o1A GAUGE
'GAMMA GUARD
GAM·!A GUARD ACOUSTIC VELOCITY'LOG
GAMMA GUARD FORXO LOG
GAt-f>1A 11! CRO-SE I S0t10GRAM
GAMMA RAY
GAMMA RAY CALIPER
GAMMA RAY COLLAR LOG
GA~1~1A RAY CORRELATION
GAM1'1A RAY FOCUS
GAf<!MA RAY r~ICROLOG
GAM·IA RAY & NEW LATERLOG
GAH11A RAY /SPACING COLLAR
GAMMA RAY TRACER
GAMMATRON
SIMULTANEOUS GAM1A RAY
SPECTROSCOPE NATURAL GAI,1r-1A
TRACER LOG.
( 18) GRN CHLORINE GAMMA RAY NEUTRON GAi~MA. RAY NEUTRON FOCUS LOG GMt·IA NEUTRON GAM1A RAY NEUTRON & PHOTON
GAHMA RAY ACOUSTILOG NEUTRON GANMA RAY NEUTRON/PFC
GAI-t1A RAY DENSITY NEUTRON RADIATION ACCURLOG
GAJ'1MA RAY NEUTRON REVISED GRN
( 19) N
GArt1A RAY-NEUTRON-CCL CORR LOG-CEfvENT LOG
GAMMA-RAY -NEUTRON-CE~1ENT LOG
COHPENSATED NEUTRON/GMIMA RAY
COMPENSATED NEUTRON LOG
COMPENSATED NEUTRON/MULTI-SPACED NEUTRON
DUAL DETECTOR NEUTRON LIFETIME LOG .
DUAL SPACED COMPENSATED NEUTRON
DUAL SPACING THERMAL NEUTRON DECAY TIME
EP ITHERt1AL N.EUTRON LOG
LINEAR NEUTRON DE~SITY POROSITY LOG
NEUTRON LOG
NEUTRON/FORMATION DENSITY
NEUTRON LIFITIME
PFC NEUTRON
SIDEWALL EPITHERMAL NEUTRON
SIDEWALL NEUTRON LOG
SIMULTANEOUS NUCLEAR
SPECTRAL LOG
THERMAL NEUTRON DECAY TIME
SCINTILLONETER NUCLEAR GAr11A RAY NEUTRON LOG
(20) NVEL NEUTRON VELICITY
NEUTRON VELOCITY
(21) PFC FORMATION FACTOR
PERFORATING FORMATION CHART
REPEAT FORMATION TESTER
(22) COL CASING COLLAR
CASING COllOR/GAMMA RAY
PERFORATING FORMATION/CASING COLLAR
( 23) PERF DEPTH CONTROL LOG
DEPTH DETERMINATOR
(24) SNP GAr-f·1A-GUARD. SIDEWALL NEUTRON LOG
NEUTRON POROSITY
(25) FD Ar~PELTUDE-VARIABLE DENSITY
BULB DENSITY
COMPENSATED DENSILOG ·
COMPENSATED DENSITY
COMPENSATED DENSITY GAMMA CALIPER LOG
PERFORATION FORMATION DEPTH CONTROL
PERFORATION FORMATION DEPTH RECORD
SIDEWALL NEUTRON GAM1A RAY
SIDEWALL NEUTRON POROSITY
COMPENSATED FORMATION DENSITY LOG
DENSILOG
DENSITY
FORMATION DENSITY
GPEN HOLE VARIABLE DENSITY
(26) CEMT CEMENT BOND CEMOTON
CEMENT BOND/GAMMA RAY Cot·!OTOP
CEMENT TOP GAMMA RAY GAMMA CEMENT BOND
CEMENT TOP LOCATOR SURVEY SATA CEMENT
CEMENT TOP LOG SEISMIC CEMENT BOND W/GAMMA RAY
SCINTILLOMETER NUCLEAR CEMENT LOCATION LOG
(27)ACMT ACOUSTIC CEMENT
ACOUSTIC CEMENT BOND LOG
~1MA RAY ACOUSTIC CEMENT BOND LOG
) (28) RA GREAT GUNS RADIOACTIVITY NUCULAR RADIATION RADIOACTIVITY TRACER RADIATION CEMENT LOG SIMULTANEOUS RADIATION LOG RAOIA TI ON GUARD TRACER RADIOACTIVITY (29) TEMP ABSOLuTE TEMP LOG STATIC TEMPERATURE DIFFERENTIAL TEMP LOG TEMPERATURE FLUID FLOW TRACER TEMP LOG TEMPERATURE SURVEY SCINTILLOMETER NUCLEAR DEFFERENTIAL TEMP (30) CDIP COMPENSATED DIPMETER DIP METER C 011P UTER 4 -ARM 0 I PL OG DIPi-ETER CALCULATION
CONTINUOUS DIPMETER DIPMETER SURVEY
( 31) OTHR ANAL-0-GRAPH INJECTIVE PROFILE
BOREHOLE AUD1 0 TRACER SURVEY ISOTOPE INJECTION
CARBON 20 ISOTRON
' CASING INSPECTION I STRUM - CASING I~SPECTION CALIPER LOG LASER LOG
CASING MINIMUM I D CALIPER LOG LOG ANALYSIS
COMPENSATED ISOTRON LOGARITHMIC OVERLAY LOG ..
.. COI-tPUTER ANALYZED LOG f10NO INDUCTION ..
COMPUTER DERIVED POROSITY LOG NUCLEAA
CONTINUOUS DIRECTIONAL NUCLEAR FORMATION
CORRELATION-ANYTHING NUCLEAR MAGNETIS1
., DALTRUM NUCLEAR TRACER ) DETAIL LOG OPEN HOLE LOG /
DIELECTRIC CONSTANT LOG PERFORATING RECORD
DIRECTIONAL LOG PERt1A LOG
DRIFT LOG PIPE ANALYSIS LOG
DRILLI1~G TIME & SAMPLE LOG PIPE RECOVS~Y LOG
EJECTO LOG TRACER PRODUCTIVITY LOG
ELECTRONIC CALIPER QUANTITATIVE INTERP
EPILOG-EXPERIMENTAL SPECTRALOG ANALYSIS SALT MUD SURVEY EXPERIMENTAL BIT-X 8 10 KHZ SCHUMBERGER CYBERLOOK
·EXPERIMENTAL EMP . SECTION GAUGE
F-LOG SPECTRA LOG
FLO-LOG STRIP
FORi·1A TI ON TESTER SYNERGETIC LOG
FRACLOG THERMAL DATA
GEOLOGICAL REPORT LOG TRACLOG
GUANTATIVE INTERP. TREAT~~NT REPORT
GUARD LOG V I P LOG .
HP WELL LOG V I P SURVEY
HYDROCARBON LOG X-Y CALIPER
'
/
APPENDIX H
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE
REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
[D
INTERNATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
August 2, 1988
Project No. 240827
Ms. Mercedes A. Murillo
California Regional Water Quality
Control Board
Los Angeles Region
107 South Broadway, Room 4027
Los Angeles, California 90012-4596
MARKET PLACE SANITARY LANDFill
Dear Ms. Murillo:
As per our conversation on August 2, 1988, I have enclosed three copies of the well construction details for monitoring well MW-1, which is located at the Market Place Landfill. This monitoring well, which is proposed to be used as one of the SWAT monitoring wells, was installed by IT Corporation during a previous investigation. This well was constructed of 2-inch-diameter PVC well _casing sections, which were flush-threaded.-
If you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter, please call the undersigned at (714) 261-6441.
Sincerely,
;; C~POR~ION (/, '
f;f~',l~
iohn Audi ni s ·
' /
Project Manager
JA:et
Enclosures: Well Construction Details of Well MW-1 (3 copies) 0827-LS Reg10na1 Office
17461 Derian Avenue • Suite 190 • Irvine, California 92714 • 714-261-6441 IT Corporation IS a wholly owned subsidiary of International Technology Corporation /"' ..
-
-...
- J -------------
..;
~
... ...
f- 20
t-
~
1-
~
~
::...·o. ~nv-1
~~'"'RC '1 '1ot !IIMJ!9
'-~\..1 INA ""!S t Got !\1Ml!9
"'E'. . .J !:>;CINE::;! •. •wd"''' JA'! 9ECAH ;c:§. !-
EOI~O !IY • 4ygl~·· JA'! :I>;ISI-IE':I :4 :! !"
:HECI<EO 9Y ;ROI.."40 St.:RF".lCE ~:_ ~ot -..,,.
TOTAL QCII'n4 310 F!tT.
t IIIOlt; Ho ~- ~~~-~-- Ill 111 ........
3~._--~_.~~--~--~--~~~------~~~--~~------~
~ROJECT NO.
CLIENT:
240402
BIXBY RANCH CO . . .,
SEE l..fCENO F'O~ L.OCS ANO TEST ~IT!
F'O~ EX !lLANA TTON 0,. SY\110\.S ANO Tt"MS m ... CreatiD& a !.afer 1'0C10M"O• j
ST ~ T!: OF CALl FORN lA
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
LOS ANGELES REGION
107 SOUTH BROADWAY. SUITE 4027
,, LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90012-4596
I (213) 620-4460
August 17, 1988
Ms. Judi McCaslin,
Construction Manager
Bixby Ranch Company
911 Studebaker Road
Long Beach, California
RECEIVED
:" 1 .-
IT CORPORATION • IRVINE
MARKET PLACE LANDFILL-CITY DUMP & SALVAGE #2 (FILE NO. 88-50) Board staff has reviewed the revised SWAT proposal for the subject landfill. staff conditionally approves the proposal at this time, with the understanding that the following items be submitted to this office under the schedules outlined below:
To be submitted by August 31, 1988:
1. A surface water monitoring plan (and map) designating the location(s) of proposed surface water sampling, sampling schedule, protocol and analyses. This procedure should be in accordance with Article· 9 of Subchapter 15, Title 23,
California Code of Regulations, and the sampling should be proposed at least once during the SWAT monitoring period·.
To be submitted prior to sampling of the monitoring wells:
2. A work plan by which you propose to identify the presence of multiple aquifers which may be present as the first water (obvious head differentials, chemical parameters, etc.).
To be included in the final SWAT report:
3. All available information on exis~ing or abandoned oil wells on the property, including a map.
4. ·As-built plans for the passive trench-vent gas system.
5. EPA Method 624 analyses for any unidentified peaks greater than 10% of the interval standard for purgeable organics obtained by EPA Methods 601/602 analyses.
6. A more detailed geologic section, crossing tne main body of the landfill.
Board staff feels that the SWAT requirements for· leachate sampling, vadose zone monitoring and permeability testing at the Market Place Landfill are not practical, and will waive them. These waivers are )
Ms. Judi McCaslin