Los Alamitos City Council
April 20, 2026

7KHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐPD\ௐDVVLJQௐRUௐFXVWRPL]HௐDQGௐDVVLJQௐWKHௐEXOOHWLQVௐSURYLGHGௐRUௐ FUHDWHௐWKHLUௐRZQௐௐ7KHௐEXOOHWLQVௐDUHௐFRPSOHWHௐDQGௐUHDG\ௐIRUௐDVVLJQPHQWௐRQFHௐLVVXHGௐ WRௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐZKLFKௐVDYHVௐWLPHௐDQGௐPRQH\ௐRQௐSROLF\SURFHGXUHௐWUDLQLQJௐ GHYHORSPHQWௐ7KHௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐFXVWRPL]HௐJLYHVௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐWKHௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐDOWHUௐWKHௐ VFHQDULRௐWRௐUHIOHFWௐDௐUHFHQWௐRFFXUUHQFHௐWRௐPDNHௐLWௐPRUHௐUHOHYDQWௐௐ7KHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐ FDQௐDOVRௐFUHDWHௐWKHLUௐRZQௐEXOOHWLQVௐWRௐVXSSOHPHQWௐWUDLQLQJௐRQௐORFDOௐVSHFLILFௐFRQWHQWௐ RUௐWRௐHQKDQFHௐZKDWௐLVௐEHLQJௐSURYLGHGௐWRௐIRFXVௐRQௐDௐORFDOௐRFFXUUHQFHௐWKDWௐPD\ௐQRWௐ EHௐFRYHUHGௐLQௐWKHௐSURYLGHGௐWUDLQLQJ
:HE%DVHGௐ'HOLYHU\ௐ3ODWIRUPௐDQGௐ0RELOHௐ$SSௐ
.QRZOHGJHௐ0DQDJHPHQWௐ6\VWHP
ௐ
/H[LSRO
VௐRQOLQHௐFRQWHQWௐGHOLYHU\ௐSODWIRUPௐFDOOHGௐWKHௐ.QRZOHGJHௐ0DQDJHPHQWௐ6\VWHPௐ

.06
ௐSURYLGHVௐVHFXUHௐVWRUDJHௐDQGௐHDV\ௐDFFHVVௐWRௐDOOௐWKHௐSROLF\SURFHGXUHௐFRQWHQWௐ DQGௐIDFLOLWDWHVௐVWDIIௐDFFHVVௐWRௐSROLFLHVௐDQGௐWUDLQLQJௐFRPSOHWLRQௐௐ7KHௐ.06ௐLVௐ DFFHVVLEOHௐYLDௐDSSVௐIRUௐ$QGURLGௐDQGௐ,26ௐDQGௐLVௐFRPSDWLEOHௐRQௐ:LQGRZVௐDQGௐ0DFௐௐ 7KHௐFRPSDWLELOLW\ௐDOORZVௐIRUௐௐDFFHVVௐRYHUௐDOPRVWௐDQ\ௐHOHFWURQLFௐGHYLFHௐWKHௐ RUJDQL]DWLRQௐRUௐLQGLYLGXDOௐSRVVHVVHVௐ
6PDUWSKRQHVௐWDEOHWVௐGHVNWRSௐFRPSXWHUVௐ
0'7¶VௐHWF
ௐ7KHௐV\VWHPௐDOORZVௐIRUௐLQWKHILHOGௐDFFHVVௐWRௐWKHௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐQRWௐRQO\ௐ RSHUDWLRQVௐEXWௐUHIHUHQFHௐDQGௐFRQWLQXHGௐWUDLQLQJௐE\ௐDOZD\VௐKDYLQJௐWKHௐPRVWௐFXUUHQWௐ YHUVLRQௐRIௐSROLFLHVSURFHGXUHVௐDYDLODEOH
.06ௐWUDFNVௐDFNQRZOHGJHPHQWVௐRIௐQHZௐSROLFLHVௐUHDGௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐDQ\ௐUHYLVLRQVௐWRௐ H[LVWLQJௐSROLFLHVௐDQGௐFRPSOHWLRQVௐRIௐWKHௐGDLO\ௐWUDLQLQJௐEXOOHWLQVௐௐ7KLVௐFUHDWHVௐDௐ GDWDEDVHௐWRௐDVVLVWௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐLQௐFUHDWLQJௐPRUHௐJRDOௐIRFXVHGௐWUDLQLQJௐWRௐKHOSௐ LQFUHDVHௐRSHUDWLRQDOௐHIIHFWLYHQHVV
7KHௐV\VWHPௐDOVRௐDUFKLYHVௐWKHௐ/H[LSROௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQ¶Vௐ FXVWRPௐFRQWHQWௐWKDWௐLVௐFKDQJHGௐRUௐUHYLVHGௐWKHUHE\ௐDOORZLQJௐIRUௐWKHௐWUDLQLQJௐDQGௐ GLIIHUHQWLDWLRQௐRIௐWKHௐROGௐYHUVLRQௐYHUVXVௐWKHௐQHZௐௐ7KHௐDUFKLYHௐDOVRௐDOORZVௐWKHௐ RUJDQL]DWLRQௐWRௐEHௐDEOHௐWRௐDFFHVVௐWKHௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐDQ\WLPHௐLQௐWKHௐIXWXUHௐDVௐWKHௐQHHGௐ DULVHV
5HSRUWVௐ
/H[LSRO
Vௐ.06ௐSURYLGHVௐLQWXLWLYHௐUHSRUWLQJௐFDSDELOLWLHVௐDQGௐHDV\WRUHDGௐUHSRUWVௐWKDWௐ HQKDQFHௐVWDIIௐPHHWLQJVௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐVWUDWHJLFௐSODQQLQJௐIRUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQDOௐWUDLQLQJௐDQGௐ JRDOVௐ7KHௐGDWDEDVHௐFDQௐEHௐDFFHVVHGௐWRௐFUHDWHௐDQGௐVRUWௐUHSRUWVௐE\ௐPXOWLSOHௐ SDUDPHWHUVௐWRௐLQFOXGHௐHPSOR\HHௐDFNQRZOHGJHPHQWVௐSROLF\ௐSURFHGXUHௐRWKHUௐ VXEJURXSVௐ
HJௐVKLIWௐDVVLJQPHQWௐHWF
ௐDQGௐFRPSOHWLRQௐRIௐ'DLO\ௐ7UDLQLQJௐ%XOOHWLQVௐE\ௐ
DJHQF\ௐPHPEHUௐDQGRUௐWRSLFௐௐ7KHVHௐSDUDPHWHUVௐFDQௐDOVRௐEHௐFRPELQHGௐWRௐFUHDWHௐ IHZHUௐPRUHௐHIILFLHQWௐUHSRUWVௐ7KLVௐUHGXFHVௐWLPHௐVXSHUYLVRUVௐVSHQGௐYHULI\LQJௐSROLF\ௐ DFNQRZOHGJHPHQWௐDQGௐWUDLQLQJௐFRPSOHWLRQௐZKLOHௐLQFUHDVLQJௐDFFRXQWDELOLW\ௐE\ௐVKRZLQJௐ ZKRௐKDVௐQRWௐFRPSOHWHGௐDVVLJQPHQWVௐௐ7KHௐUHSRUWVௐDOVRௐDVVLVWௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐE\ௐ HDVLO\ௐFDSWXULQJௐWKHௐGDWDௐLQௐIRUPDWVௐWKDWௐFDQௐEHௐVWDQGDORQHௐRUௐFRPSDWLEOHௐZLWKௐRWKHUௐ SODWIRUPVௐWRௐPHUJHௐLQWRௐRWKHUௐUHSRUWV
6XSSOHPHQWDOௐ3XEOLFDWLRQௐ6HUYLFHௐ
/H[LSRO
Vௐ6XSSOHPHQWDOௐ3XEOLFDWLRQௐ6HUYLFHௐ
636
ௐRUJDQL]HVௐWKHௐVWRUDJHௐRIௐWKHௐ
RUJDQL]DWLRQ¶VௐVSHFLILFௐFRQWHQWௐJLYLQJௐRQHௐSODFHௐWRௐDFFHVVௐSURWRFROVௐSURFHGXUHVௐ JXLGHOLQHVௐJHQHUDOௐRUGHUVௐWUDLQLQJௐJXLGHVௐFDUHHUௐSDWKௐWUDLQLQJௐSODQVௐRUௐVHFRQGDU\ௐ SROLF\ௐPDQXDOVௐ636ௐDOVRௐHOHFWURQLFDOO\ௐOLQNVௐGHSDUWPHQWVSHFL¿FௐSURFHGXUDOௐRUௐ VXSSOHPHQWDOௐFRQWHQWௐWRௐWKHௐ/H[LSROௐVWDWHௐPDVWHUௐSROLF\ௐPDQXDOௐௐ,IௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐ LVௐILUHௐRUௐODZௐHQIRUFHPHQWௐWKHௐ/H[LSROௐSURYLGHGௐSURFHGXUHVௐDUHௐVWRUHGௐLQௐDௐ636ௐWRௐ FOHDUO\ௐGHOLQHDWHௐZKDWௐLVௐSROLF\ௐDQGௐZKDWௐLVௐSURFHGXUHௐௐ2UJDQL]DWLRQVௐFDQௐSXUFKDVHௐ PRUHௐWKDQௐRQHௐ636ௐGHSHQGLQJௐRQௐWKHLUௐQHHGVௐDQGௐLWௐLVௐLQFOXGHGௐLQௐWKHௐDQQXDOௐ VXEVFULSWLRQ
$FFUHGLWDWLRQௐ:RUNEHQFK
0DQDJLQJௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQVௐDFFUHGLWDWLRQௐSURFHVVௐLVௐDௐFRPSOH[ௐWDVNௐWKDWௐUHTXLUHVௐ LQWLPDWHௐNQRZOHGJHௐRIௐSROLF\ௐWUDLQLQJௐDQGௐH[WUHPHௐDWWHQWLRQௐWRௐGHWDLOௐ/H[LSRO¶Vௐ $FFUHGLWDWLRQௐ:RUNEHQFKௐSURYLGHVௐDQௐRUJDQL]DWLRQ¶Vௐ$FFUHGLWDWLRQௐ0DQDJHUௐDFFHVVௐWRௐ FRQWHQWௐDQGௐWRROVௐWKDWௐVLJQLILFDQWO\ௐUHGXFHௐWKHௐWLPHௐDQGௐHIIRUWௐUHTXLUHGௐWRௐVXFFHVVIXOO\ௐ SUHSDUHௐIRUௐDQGௐH[HFXWHௐDQௐDFFUHGLWDWLRQௐDVVHVVPHQWௐௐ7KHௐZRUNEHQFKௐKDVௐFXUUHQWௐ VWDQGDUGVௐIRUௐVXSSRUWHGௐDFFUHGLWDWLRQௐSURJUDPVௐSUHORDGHGௐDQGௐYLHZDEOHௐ/H[LSROௐ SROLFLHVௐDUHௐSUHWDJJHGௐWRௐPDQ\ௐDSSOLFDEOHௐVWDQGDUGVௐDQGௐWKHௐ$FFUHGLWDWLRQௐ0DQDJHUௐ FDQௐHDVLO\ௐDGGௐRUௐPRGLI\ௐWDJJLQJௐWRௐPHHWௐVSHFLILFௐSURJUDPௐQHHGVௐ&RPSOLDQFHௐ FKHFNOLVWVௐDUHௐSUHORDGHGௐIRUௐHDFKௐVWDQGDUGௐFOHDUO\ௐGHWDLOLQJௐUHTXLUHGௐZULWWHQௐ GLUHFWLYHVௐDQGௐSURRIVௐRIௐFRPSOLDQFHௐ
$FFUHGLWDWLRQௐ0DQDJHUௐFDQௐDOVRௐFXVWRPL]HௐWKHௐ

FKHFNOLVWV
ௐ7KHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐFDQௐXSORDGௐVWRUHௐDQGௐRUJDQL]HௐSURRIVௐRIௐFRPSOLDQFHௐ

HJௐGRFXPHQWVௐYLGHRV
ௐLQௐDௐSUHIRUPDWWHGௐHOHFWURQLFௐIROGHUௐV\VWHPௐWKDWௐLVௐEDVHGௐRQௐ KRZௐWKHௐDFFUHGLWLQJௐERG\ௐRUJDQL]HVௐVWDQGDUGVௐDQGௐLWVௐDFFUHGLWDWLRQௐUHYLHZௐF\FOHௐ,Wௐ DOVRௐDOORZVௐIRUௐFRPSOHWHௐVHOIDVVHVVPHQWVௐE\ௐXVLQJௐDQDO\VLVௐWRROVௐWRௐLGHQWLI\ௐJDSVௐLQௐ UHTXLUHGௐSURRIVௐRIௐFRPSOLDQFHௐௐ7KHௐZRUNEHQFKௐVWUHDPOLQHVௐWKHௐDVVHVVPHQWௐSURFHVVௐ E\ௐJHQHUDWLQJௐSULQWHGௐUHSRUWVௐRUௐVKRZLQJௐWKHௐDVVHVVRUௐFRPSOLDQFHௐLWHPVௐVWRUHGௐLQௐ WKHௐRQOLQHௐV\VWHP
,03/(0(17$7,21 6(59,&(
Bid Number: RFP 011822 Vendor Name: Lexipol, LLC







 


 





$ௐUHFRPPHQGHGௐRQHWLPHௐFRVWௐWKDWௐLVௐDௐVHUYLFHௐWRௐDVVLVWௐSROLF\ௐPDQXDOௐFUHDWLRQௐ DQGௐLWௐDFFRPSDQLHVௐWKHௐDQQXDOௐVXEVFULSWLRQௐௐ:HௐZRUNௐKDQGௐLQௐKDQGௐZLWKௐWKHௐ RUJDQL]DWLRQௐWRௐPHHWௐWKHLUௐXQLTXHௐQHHGVௐSKLORVRSK\ௐDQGௐSURMHFWௐWLPHOLQHௐSURYLGLQJௐ VWDUWௐWRௐILQLVKௐFRPSUHKHQVLYHௐSROLF\ௐDGRSWLRQௐDVVLVWDQFHௐௐ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQௐFDQௐDOVRௐ EHௐFXVWRPL]HGௐWRௐPHHWௐRUJDQL]DWLRQDOௐQHHGVௐௐ7KHௐIROORZLQJௐDUHௐLQFOXGHGௐLQௐWKHௐ LPSOHPHQWDWLRQௐVHUYLFHV

‡ௐௐௐௐ2UJDQL]DWLRQDOௐ3ROLF\ௐ&URVVௐ5HIHUHQFH
‡ௐௐௐௐ&RQWHQWௐ([WUDFWLRQ
‡ௐௐௐௐ&ROODERUDWLYHௐ7LHUHGௐRUௐ)XOOௐ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ
3ROLF\ௐ&URVVௐ5HIHUHQFH
0DNLQJௐWKHௐWUDQVLWLRQௐWRௐ/H[LSROௐVWDUWVௐZLWKௐXQGHUVWDQGLQJௐKRZௐDQௐRUJDQL]DWLRQ¶Vௐ FXUUHQWௐSROLF\ௐFRQWHQWௐFRPSDUHVௐZLWKௐ/H[LSRO¶VௐPDVWHUௐSROLF\ௐFRQWHQWௐ2XUௐSROLF\ௐ FURVVௐUHIHUHQFHௐVHUYLFHௐSURYLGHVௐDௐORJLFDOௐPHWKRGௐWRௐGLVWLQJXLVKLQJௐEHWZHHQௐWKHௐWZRௐ 7KHௐVHUYLFHௐLQFOXGHVௐDQௐDQDO\VLVௐRIௐH[LVWLQJௐSROLFLHVௐDQGௐSURFHGXUHVௐWRௐLGHQWLI\ௐ FRQWHQWௐVLPLODUௐWRௐ/H[LSRO¶VௐPDVWHUௐFRQWHQWௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐFRQWHQWௐXQLTXHௐWRௐWKHௐ RUJDQL]DWLRQVௐMXULVGLFWLRQௐDQGௐQRWௐFRYHUHGௐZLWKLQௐWKHௐ/H[LSROௐPDQXDOௐௐ([LVWLQJௐ VXEPLWWHGௐSROLFLHVௐDUHௐUHWXUQHGௐZLWKௐDQQRWDWLRQVௐDQGௐWLSVௐRQௐKRZௐWRௐLQWHJUDWHௐLQWRௐ WKHௐ/H[LSROௐPDVWHUௐFRQWHQWௐௐ7KHUHௐLVௐDOVRௐDௐRQHRQRQHௐUHYLHZௐZLWKௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐ WRௐGLVFXVVௐWKHௐFURVVUHIHUHQFHௐUHSRUWௐௐ7KHUHௐDUHௐWKUHHௐFURVVௐUHIHUHQFHVௐDYDLODEOHௐ GHSHQGLQJௐRQௐRUJDQL]DWLRQDOௐQHHGVௐௐ7KH\ௐDUHௐDVௐIROORZV

‡ௐௐௐௐ6WDQGDUGௐ&URVVௐ5HIHUHQFH
‡ௐௐௐௐ&RPSUHKHQVLYHௐ&URVVௐ5HIHUHQFH
‡ௐௐௐௐ$FFUHGLWDWLRQௐ&URVVௐ5HIHUHQFH
$JHQF\6SHFLILFௐ&RQWHQWௐ([WUDFWLRQ
7KLVௐVHUYLFHௐLVௐSHUIHFWௐIRUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQVௐWKDWௐZLVKௐWRௐSRSXODWHௐRQHௐRUௐPRUHௐ 6XSSOHPHQWDOௐ3XEOLFDWLRQௐ6HUYLFHௐ
636
ௐPDQXDOVௐZLWKௐWKHLUௐH[LVWLQJௐFRQWHQWௐ/H[LSROௐ
ZLOOௐGRௐWKHௐKHDY\ௐOLIWLQJௐRIௐLQFRUSRUDWLQJௐWKHLUௐVXSSOHPHQWDOௐFRQWHQWௐ SURFHGXUHVௐ
JXLGHOLQHVௐJHQHUDOௐRUGHUVௐWUDLQLQJௐJXLGHௐRUௐDௐVHFRQGDU\ௐSROLF\ௐPDQXDO ௐLQWRௐWKHௐ
636ௐ$FFHVVௐWRௐDQௐHOHFWURQLFௐFRS\ௐRIௐWKHௐH[LVWLQJௐFRQWHQWௐDQGௐDௐVXEVFULSWLRQௐWRௐWKHௐ 6XSSOHPHQWDOௐ3XEOLFDWLRQௐ6HUYLFHௐ
636
ௐLVௐUHTXLUHGௐௐ
,QFOXGHGௐLQௐFRQWHQWௐH[WUDFWLRQௐLVௐGDWDௐHQWU\ௐRIௐRUJDQL]DWLRQDOௐSURFHGXUHVௐRUௐ VXSSOHPHQWDOௐFRQWHQWௐLQWRௐ/H[LSRO¶Vௐ.QRZOHGJHௐ0DQDJHPHQWௐ6\VWHPௐ .06
ௐ1RWH
ௐ
/H[LSROௐUHVHUYHVௐWKHௐULJKWௐWRௐOLPLWௐWKHௐDPRXQWௐRIௐFRQWHQWௐEHLQJௐLPSRUWHGௐLQWRௐWKHௐ 636ௐௐ3URIHVVLRQDOௐ6HUYLFHVௐZLOOௐDVVLVWௐLQௐGHFRQIOLFWLQJௐWKHௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐLQௐWKHௐ636ௐ ZLWKௐWKHௐSROLF\ௐPDQXDOௐDQGௐFUHDWHௐK\SHUOLQNVௐWRௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐZLWKLQௐWKHௐSODWIRUPௐWRௐ HDVHௐXVHUௐDFFHVVௐௐ7KLVௐHQVXUHVௐFRQVLVWHQWௐSURIHVVLRQDOௐIRUPDWWLQJௐIRUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQ¶Vௐ SROLF\UHODWHGௐFRQWHQWௐDQGௐSURYLGHVௐWKHௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐK\SHUOLQNௐUHODWHGௐFRQWHQWௐIRUௐ HQKDQFHGௐHQGXVHUௐH[SHULHQFH
7LHUHGௐ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ
%HQHILWௐIURPௐRXUௐSURYHQௐV\VWHPDWLFௐDSSURDFKௐWRௐLPSOHPHQWLQJௐSROLFLHVௐ7KHௐ RUJDQL]DWLRQௐZLOOௐUHFHLYHௐRQHRQRQHௐFROODERUDWLYHௐDVVLVWDQFHௐWRௐKHOSௐUHYLHZௐ FXVWRPL]HௐDQGௐDGRSWௐWKHௐSROLFLHVௐHIILFLHQWO\ௐDQGௐHIIHFWLYHO\ ‡ௐௐௐௐ7LHUௐ
ௐ+LJK5LVNௐ3ROLFLHVௐ
7LHUௐௐUHSUHVHQWVௐDERXWௐௐRIௐWKHௐPDQXDOௐLQFOXGLQJௐIRXQGDWLRQDOௐSROLFLHVௐQHFHVVDU\ௐ WRௐSURYLGHௐVWUXFWXUHௐDQGௐDXWKRULW\ௐWRௐ\RXUௐSROLF\ௐPDQXDOௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐSROLFLHVௐ DGGUHVVLQJௐKLJKULVNௐORZIUHTXHQF\ௐDQGௐKLJKULVNௐKLJKIUHTXHQF\ௐLQFLGHQWVௐ ‡ௐௐௐௐ7LHUௐ
ௐ+LJK/LDELOLW\ௐ3ROLFLHV
7LHUௐௐUHSUHVHQWVௐDERXWௐௐRIௐWKHௐPDQXDOௐLQFOXGLQJௐSROLFLHVௐWKDWௐUHODWHௐWRௐFRPPRQௐ GD\WRGD\ௐFDOOVௐIRUௐVHUYLFHௐWKDWௐKDYHௐDௐKLJKHUௐOHYHOௐRIௐSRWHQWLDOௐOLDELOLW\ௐ ‡ௐௐௐௐ7LHUௐ
ௐ'DLO\ௐ2SHUDWLRQVௐ3ROLFLHV
7LHUௐௐUHSUHVHQWVௐDERXWௐௐRIௐWKHௐPDQXDOௐLQFOXGLQJௐSROLFLHVௐQHHGHGௐIRUௐRUGHUO\ௐ GDLO\ௐRSHUDWLRQVௐRIௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐ
‡ௐௐௐௐ7LHUௐ
ௐ'HIHQVLELOLW\ௐ3ROLFLHV
7LHUௐௐUHSUHVHQWVௐDERXWௐௐRIௐWKHௐPDQXDOௐLQFOXGLQJௐSROLFLHVௐHVVHQWLDOௐWRௐDJHQF\ௐ DQGௐDJHQF\ௐPHPEHUௐGHIHQVLELOLW\ௐLQFOXGLQJௐFLYLOௐOLDELOLW\UHODWHGௐWRSLFV ‡ௐௐௐௐ7LHUௐ
ௐ2SHUDWLRQDOௐ&RQVLVWHQF\ௐ3ROLFLHV
7LHUௐௐUHSUHVHQWVௐDERXWௐௐRIௐWKHௐPDQXDOௐLQFOXGLQJௐSROLFLHVௐQHHGHGௐWRௐHQVXUHௐ RSHUDWLRQDOௐFRQVLVWHQF\ௐDFURVVௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQ
)XOOௐ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQ
/H[LSRO¶Vௐ)XOOௐ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQௐ6HUYLFHௐLVௐLQGLYLGXDOO\ௐWDLORUHGௐIRUௐDJHQFLHVௐZKRௐZDQWௐWRௐ VWDUWWRILQLVKௐFRPSUHKHQVLYHௐSROLF\ௐDGRSWLRQௐDVVLVWDQFHௐ/H[LSRO¶VௐH[SHULHQFHGௐ 3URIHVVLRQDOௐ6HUYLFHVௐVWDIIௐZLOOௐVWUHDPOLQHௐWKHௐSURFHVVௐRIௐSROLF\ௐDGRSWLRQௐE\ௐ DVVLVWLQJௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐLQௐGHYHORSLQJௐDௐSROLF\ௐPDQXDOௐWKDWௐPHHWVௐWKHLUௐXQLTXHௐ QHHGVௐSKLORVRSK\ௐDQGௐSURMHFWௐWLPHOLQHௐௐ7KH\ௐZLOOௐLQWHJUDWHௐSUHH[LVWLQJௐDJHQF\ௐ FRQWHQWௐLQWRௐDSSURSULDWHௐVHFWLRQVௐZLWKLQௐWKHௐSROLF\ௐPDQXDOௐXVLQJௐDௐSURYHQௐVWUXFWXUHௐRIௐ SROLF\ௐHGLWLQJௐDQGௐFRQWHQWௐPHUJLQJௐWRௐFUHDWHௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQVௐQHZௐSROLF\ௐPDQXDOௐ WKHUHE\ௐVDYLQJௐWKHௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐFRXQWOHVVௐKRXUVௐDQGௐGROODUVௐௐ7KLVௐZLOOௐSURYLGHௐDௐ IUDPHZRUNௐWRௐH[SHGLWHௐVXEVHTXHQWௐSROLF\ௐXSGDWHVௐDQGௐ'DLO\ௐ7UDLQLQJௐ%XOOHWLQௐ DGPLQLVWUDWLRQ
Bid Number: RFP 011822 Vendor Name: Lexipol, LLC







 


 





)XOOௐLPSOHPHQWDWLRQௐLQFOXGHVௐVWDUWWRILQLVKௐFRPSUHKHQVLYHௐSROLF\ௐDGRSWLRQௐDVVLVWDQFHௐ 3ROLF\ௐ&URVVௐ5HIHUHQFHௐDQGௐ&RQWHQWௐ([WUDFWLRQ
'(/,9(5('ௐ$1'ௐ23(5$7,21$/
/H[LSROௐ3ROLF\ௐ6DD6ௐDSSOLFDWLRQVௐDUHௐPXOWLWHQDQWௐDQGௐXVHUDJHQF\ௐGDWDௐLVௐVHSDUDWHGௐ ORJLFDOO\ௐYLDௐ5%$&ௗௐ'DWDEDVHௐ,QIUDVWUXFWXUHௐLVௐHQFU\SWHGௐDWௐUHVWௐYLDௐ$(6ௐDQGௐ DSSOLFDWLRQௐWUDIILFௐLVௐHQFU\SWHGௐZLWKௐ7/6ௐRUௐDERYHௐ /H[LSROௐ3ROLF\ௐ6DD6ௐDSSOLFDWLRQVௐDUHௐEDFNHGௐE\ௐDௐGHGLFDWHGௐRIIVLWHௐFURVVUHJLRQௐ 'LVDVWHUௐ5HFRYHU\ௐ'DWDFHQWHUௗௐ%DFNXSVௐRIௐDOOௐ6DD6ௐV\VWHPVௐDUHௐFRQWLQXRXVO\ௐ V\QFKURQL]HGௐWRௐWKHௐ'LVDVWHUௐ5HFRYHU\ௐ'DWDFHQWHUௐDQGௐWHVWHGௐYLDௐDXWRPDWHGௐPHDQV ௐ
PDQXDOௐWHVWLQJௐLVௐSHUIRUPHGௐUHJXODUO\ௗௐ'LVDVWHUௐ5HFRYHU\ௐDQGௐ6\VWHPௐ5HVWRUDWLRQௐ SROLFLHVSURFHGXUHVௐDUHௐGRFXPHQWHGௐFRPPXQLFDWHGௐDQGௐWHVWHGௐUHJXODUO\ௐ $FFHVVௐWRௐWKHௐV\VWHPௐLVௐJUDQWHGௐXSRQௐH[HFXWLRQௐRIௐWKHௐVDOHVௐDJUHHPHQW  :LWKLQௐWKLVௐ5)3ௐFDWHJRU\ௐWKHUHௐPD\ௐEHௐ
VXEFDWHJRULHVௐRIௐVROXWLRQVௐ/LVWௐVXEFDWHJRU\ௐ
WLWOHVௐWKDWௐEHVWௐGHVFULEHௐ\RXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐ
VHUYLFHV
3XEOLFௐ6DIHW\ௐ$GPLQLVWUDWLYHௐ6HUYLFHVௐ2IILFHௐ ௐ7HFKQRORJ\ 

7DEOH%
'HSWKDQG%UHDGWKRI2IIHUHG(TXLSPHQW3URGXFWVDQG6HUYLFHV ,QGLFDWHEHORZLIWKHOLVWHGW\SHVRUFODVVHVRIHTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVDQGVHUYLFHVDUHRIIHUHGZLWKLQ\RXUSURSRVDO3URYLGHDGGLWLRQDO FRPPHQWVLQWKHWH[WER[SURYLGHGDVQHFHVVDU\
/LQH,WHP &DWHJRU\RU7\SH 2IIHUHG
&RPPHQWV
 )DFLOLWLHVௐVWUXFWXUHVௐ
IL[HGௐRUௐPRELOH
ௐHTXLSPHQWௐ
SURSVௐVXSSOLHVௐDQGௐFRQVXPDEOHV
<HV
1R
 $XJPHQWHGௐRUௐYLUWXDOௐUHDOLW\ௐLQWHUDFWLYHௐDQGௐGLJLWDOௐ VLPXODWLRQௐWHFKQRORJ\ௐDQGௐUHODWHGௐVRIWZDUHௐ
KDUGZDUHௐRUௐHTXLSPHQW
<HV
1R
/H[LSROௐSURYLGHVௐLQWHUDFWLYHௐWUDLQLQJௐ
FRXUVHVௐWKURXJKௐDௐSURSULHWDU\ௐZHEௐ
EDVHGௐSODWIRUPௐDYDLODEOHௐௐRQௐ
FRPSXWHUௐDQGௐPRELOHௐGHYLFHVௐZKHUHௐ
FRQQHFWLYLW\ௐLVௐDYDLODEOH
 ,QVWUXFWLRQDOௐHGXFDWLRQDOௐDQGௐWUDLQLQJௐSURJUDPVௐRUௐ V\VWHPVௐZLWKௐUHODWHGௐPDWHULDOVௐDQGௐVXSSOLHV
<HV
1R
:HௐSURYLGHௐDௐIXOOVHUYLFHௐ/06ௐZLWKௐ
HOHFWURQLFௐUHSRUWLQJௐWUDFNLQJௐDQGௐ
WUDLQLQJௐPDQDJHPHQWௐLQFOXGLQJௐWKHௐ
DELOLW\ௐWRௐXSORDGௐDQGௐDVVLJQௐDJHQF\
VSHFLILFௐWUDLQLQJௐFRQWHQWௐPRUHௐWKDQௐ
ௐKLJKTXDOLW\ௐDFFUHGLWHGௐWUDLQLQJௐ
FRXUVHVௐDQGௐPLFUROHDUQLQJௐௐYLGHRVௐ
DQGௐௐDFFHVVLELOLW\ௐIURPௐDQ\ௐLQWHUQHW
HQDEOHGௐGHYLFHௐ/H[LSROௐDGKHUHVௐWRௐ
LQGXVWU\ௐVWDQGDUGVௐDQGௐVWDWHௐDQGௐ
IHGHUDOௐODZௐZKHQௐFUHDWLQJௐRQOLQHௐ
OHDUQLQJௐDQGௐSROLF\ௐWUDLQLQJௐFRQWHQW
 6HUYLFHVௐUHODWHGௐWRௐWKHௐRIIHULQJௐRIௐWKHௐVROXWLRQVௐ
GHVFULEHGௐLQௐ5)3ௐ6HFWLRQVௐௐDௐ±ௐFௐLQFOXGLQJௐ
GHVLJQௐLQVWDOODWLRQௐPDLQWHQDQFHௐUHSDLUௐWUDLQLQJௐ
LQWHJUDWLRQௐVXSSRUWௐDQGௐFXVWRPL]DWLRQ
<HV
1R
(DFKௐDJHQF\ௐEHJLQVௐWKHLUௐMRXUQH\ௐZLWKௐ
SODWIRUPௐWUDLQLQJௐDQGௐRUJDQL]DWLRQDOௐ
FXVWRPL]DWLRQௐFRQGXFWHGௐE\ௐ/H[LSRO
Vௐ
3URIHVVLRQDOௐ6HUYLFHௐ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQௐ
WHDPௐ2QJRLQJௐWUDLQLQJௐVXSSRUWௐDQGௐ
FXVWRPL]DWLRQௐLVௐKDQGOHGௐE\ௐRXUௐ
FXVWRPHUௐVXFFHVVௐWHDP
Bid Number: RFP 011822 Vendor Name: Lexipol, LLC







 


 





7DEOH
,QGXVWU\6SHFLILF4XHVWLRQV
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH

 'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐSURGXFWVVHUYLFHVௐ
LQWHURSHUDELOLW\ௐZLWKௐRWKHUௐSXEOLFௐVDIHW\ௐ
HTXLSPHQWௐVRIWZDUHௐDQGௐV\VWHPVௐLIௐ
DSSOLFDEOH
2XUௐRQOLQHௐOHDUQLQJௐSODWIRUPௐLQWHJUDWHVௐZLWKௐKXPDQௐUHVRXUFHVௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐV\VWHPௐ

+5,6
ௐUHFRUGVௐPDQDJHPHQWௐSODWIRUPௐDQGௐVFKHGXOLQJௐVRIWZDUHௐWRௐVWUHDPOLQHௐWUDLQLQJௐ PDQDJHPHQWௐ:HௐRIIHUௐ6LQJOHௐ6LJQRQௐWRௐFRQWUROௐ/06ௐDFFHVVௐSHUPLVVLRQVௐZLWKௐWKHௐ DJHQF\
VௐLGHQWLW\ௐPDQDJHPHQWௐV\VWHPௐDQGௐV\QFௐ+5ௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐOLNHௐHPSOR\HHௐUDQNௐ MREௐWLWOHௐHGXFDWLRQௐDQGௐSURIHVVLRQDOௐH[SHULHQFHௐ/H[LSRO VௐRQOLQHௐOHDUQLQJௐDQGௐSROLF\ௐ
WUDLQLQJௐVROXWLRQௐJHQHUDWHௐUHSRUWVௐLQௐIRUPDWVௐDFFHSWHGௐE\ௐPRVWௐPDMRUௐVRIWZDUHௐ V\VWHPVௐ3ROLF\ௐWUDLQLQJௐFRQWHQWௐFDQௐEHௐH[SRUWHGௐWRௐ3')ௐIRUPDWௐRUௐ([FHOௐVSUHDGVKHHWௐ WKHQௐXSORDGHGௐIRUௐGLVWULEXWLRQௐDQGௐDFFUHGLWDWLRQௐUHSRUWLQJௐSXUSRVHV  'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐVWUDWHJ\ௐUHODWHGௐWRௐ
LPSOHPHQWDWLRQௐXVHௐRIௐLQVWDOODWLRQௐSDUWQHUVௐ
DQGௐLQWHJUDWLRQௐZLWKௐRWKHUௐWUDLQLQJௐSURGXFWVௐ
DQGௐV\VWHPVௐLIௐDSSOLFDEOH
(YHU\ௐGHSDUWPHQWௐDQGௐDJHQF\ௐZLOOௐSDUWLFLSDWHௐLQௐDQௐRQERDUGLQJௐSURFHVVௐFRQGXFWHGௐE\ௐ /H[LSRO
Vௐ3URIHVVLRQDOௐ6HUYLFHௐ,PSOHPHQWDWLRQௐWHDPௐ7KLVௐJURXSௐRIௐSDVVLRQDWHௐ SURIHVVLRQDOVௐIRFXVHVௐRQௐSURGXFWௐLPSOHPHQWDWLRQௐLQLWLDOௐWUDLQLQJௐRQௐWKHௐSODWIRUPௐ IHDWXUHVௐWHFKQLFDOௐVXSSRUWௐDQGௐUHSRUWLQJ

([SODLQௐ\RXUௐOLFHQVLQJௐSURFHVVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHௐ
DJUHHPHQWVௐZLWKௐHQGௐXVHUV
6HUYLFHVௐDJUHHPHQWVௐDUHௐUHQHZHGௐRQௐDQௐDQQXDOௐEDVLVௐXQOHVVௐRWKHUZLVHௐQRWHGௐLQௐWKHௐ DJUHHPHQWௐௐ7KHௐVWDUWௐRIௐWKHௐVXEVFULSWLRQௐLVௐEDVHGௐRQௐWKHௐGDWHௐWKHௐDJUHHPHQWௐLVௐ H[HFXWHGௐXQOHVVௐRWKHUZLVHௐQRWHG
 'HVFULEHௐFRPSOLDQFHௐWRௐDSSOLFDEOHௐQDWLRQDOௐ
VWDQGDUGVௐVXFKௐDV
ௐ1DWLRQDOௐ)LUHௐ3URWHFWLRQௐ
$VVRFLDWLRQௐ
1)3$
ௐ2FFXSDWLRQDOௐ6DIHW\ௐ
DQGௐ+HDOWKௐ$GPLQLVWUDWLRQௐ
26+$
ௐDQGௐ
$PHULFDQௐ1DWLRQDOௐ6WDQGDUGVௐ,QVWLWXWHௐ

$16,

$OOௐFRQWHQWௐLVௐFRQVWLWXWLRQDOO\ௐVRXQGௐDQGௐEDVHGௐRQௐ)HGHUDO6WDWHௐODZVௐDQGௐUHJXODWLRQVௐ 1)3$ௐ26+$ௐ1,26+ௐFRXUWௐGHFLVLRQVௐDQGௐFXUUHQWௐLQGXVWU\ௐEHVWௐSUDFWLFHV  ([SODLQௐDQGௐSURYLGHௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐDERXWௐDQ\ௐ
GHVLJQௐVHUYLFHVௐ\RXௐSURYLGHௐLIௐDSSOLFDEOH
1$
7DEOH
([FHSWLRQVWR7HUPV&RQGLWLRQVRU6SHFLILFDWLRQV)RUP /LQH,WHP127,&(
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
'RFXPHQWV
(QVXUH\RXUVXEPLVVLRQGRFXPHQW
V
FRQIRUPVWRWKHIROORZLQJ

'RFXPHQWVLQ3')IRUPDWDUHSUHIHUUHG'RFXPHQWVLQ:RUG([FHORUFRPSDWLEOHIRUPDWVPD\DOVREHSURYLGHG 'RFXPHQWVVKRXOG127KDYHDVHFXULW\SDVVZRUGDV6RXUFHZHOOPD\QRWEHDEOHWRRSHQWKHILOH,WLV\RXUVROHUHVSRQVLELOLW\WR HQVXUHWKDWWKHXSORDGHGGRFXPHQW
V
DUHQRWHLWKHUGHIHFWLYHFRUUXSWHGRUEODQNDQGWKDWWKHGRFXPHQWVFDQEHRSHQHGDQGYLHZHG E\6RXUFHZHOO
6RXUFHZHOOPD\UHMHFWDQ\UHVSRQVHZKHUHDQ\GRFXPHQW V
FDQQRWEHRSHQHGDQGYLHZHGE\6RXUFHZHOO
,I\RXQHHGWRXSORDGPRUHWKDQRQH

GRFXPHQWIRUDVLQJOHLWHP\RXVKRXOGFRPELQHWKHGRFXPHQWVLQWRRQH]LSSHGILOH,IWKH ]LSSHGILOHFRQWDLQVPRUHWKDQRQH

GRFXPHQWHQVXUHHDFKGRFXPHQWLVQDPHGLQUHODWLRQWRWKHVXEPLVVLRQIRUPDWLWHPUHVSRQGLQJ WR)RUH[DPSOHLIUHVSRQGLQJWRWKH0DUNHWLQJ3ODQFDWHJRU\VDYHWKHGRFXPHQWDV³0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ´ Bid Number: RFP 011822 Vendor Name: Lexipol, LLC







 


 





3ULFLQJ3ULFLQJIRU6RXUFHZHOO[OV[6DWXUGD\-DQXDU\ 

)LQDQFLDO6WUHQJWKDQG6WDELOLW\)LQDQFLDO6WUHQJWK 6WDELOLW\SGI7XHVGD\-DQXDU\ 

0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ6DPSOHV0DUNHWLQJ3ODQSGI7XHVGD\-DQXDU\ 


:0%(0%(6%(RU5HODWHG&HUWLILFDWHV

RSWLRQDO

:DUUDQW\,QIRUPDWLRQ:DUUDQW\SGI7XHVGD\-DQXDU\ 

6WDQGDUG7UDQVDFWLRQ'RFXPHQW6DPSOHV6DPSOH6DOHV$JUHHPHQWSGI7XHVGD\-DQXDU\ 


8SORDG$GGLWLRQDO'RFXPHQW

RSWLRQDO

Bid Number: RFP 011822 Vendor Name: Lexipol, LLC







 


 





$GGHQGD7HUPVDQG&RQGLWLRQV
352326(5$)),'$9,7$1'$6685$1&(2)&203/,$1&(
,FHUWLI\WKDW,DPWKHDXWKRUL]HGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHRIWKH3URSRVHUVXEPLWWLQJWKHIRUHJRLQJ3URSRVDOZLWKWKHOHJDODXWKRULW\WRELQGWKH 3URSRVHUWRWKLV$IILGDYLWDQG$VVXUDQFHRI&RPSOLDQFH

 7KH3URSRVHULVVXEPLWWLQJWKLV3URSRVDOXQGHULWVIXOODQGFRPSOHWHOHJDOQDPHDQGWKH3URSRVHUOHJDOO\H[LVWVLQJRRGVWDQGLQJLQ WKHMXULVGLFWLRQRILWVUHVLGHQFH
 7KH3URSRVHUZDUUDQWVWKDWWKHLQIRUPDWLRQSURYLGHGLQWKLV3URSRVDOLVWUXHFRUUHFWDQGUHOLDEOHIRUSXUSRVHVRIHYDOXDWLRQIRU FRQWUDFWDZDUG
 7KH3URSRVHULQFOXGLQJDQ\SHUVRQDVVLVWLQJZLWKWKHFUHDWLRQRIWKLV3URSRVDOKDVDUULYHGDWWKLV3URSRVDOLQGHSHQGHQWO\DQGWKH 3URSRVDOKDVEHHQFUHDWHGZLWKRXWFROOXGLQJZLWKDQ\RWKHUSHUVRQFRPSDQ\RUSDUWLHVWKDWKDYHRUZLOOVXEPLWDSURSRVDOXQGHU WKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ
DQGWKH3URSRVDOKDVLQDOOUHVSHFWVEHHQFUHDWHGIDLUO\ZLWKRXWDQ\IUDXGRUGLVKRQHVW\7KH3URSRVHUKDVQRW GLUHFWO\RULQGLUHFWO\HQWHUHGLQWRDQ\DJUHHPHQWRUDUUDQJHPHQWZLWKDQ\SHUVRQRUEXVLQHVVLQDQHIIRUWWRLQIOXHQFHDQ\SDUWRI WKLVVROLFLWDWLRQRURSHUDWLRQVRIDUHVXOWLQJFRQWUDFW DQGWKH3URSRVHUKDVQRWWDNHQDQ\DFWLRQLQUHVWUDLQWRIIUHHWUDGHRU FRPSHWLWLYHQHVVLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ$GGLWLRQDOO\LI3URSRVHUKDVZRUNHGZLWKDFRQVXOWDQWRQWKH3URSRVDOWKH FRQVXOWDQW
DQLQGLYLGXDORUDFRPSDQ\
KDVQRWDVVLVWHGDQ\RWKHUHQWLW\WKDWKDVVXEPLWWHGRUZLOOVXEPLWDSURSRVDOIRUWKLV VROLFLWDWLRQ
 7RWKHEHVWRILWVNQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHIDQGH[FHSWDVRWKHUZLVHGLVFORVHGLQWKH3URSRVDOWKHUHDUHQRUHOHYDQWIDFWVRU FLUFXPVWDQFHVZKLFKFRXOGJLYHULVHWRDQRUJDQL]DWLRQDOFRQIOLFWRILQWHUHVW$QRUJDQL]DWLRQDOFRQIOLFWRILQWHUHVWH[LVWVZKHQD YHQGRUKDVDQXQIDLUFRPSHWLWLYHDGYDQWDJHRUWKHYHQGRU¶VREMHFWLYLW\LQSHUIRUPLQJWKHFRQWUDFWLVRUPLJKWEHLPSDLUHG  7KHFRQWHQWVRIWKH3URSRVDOKDYHQRWEHHQFRPPXQLFDWHGE\WKH3URSRVHURULWVHPSOR\HHVRUDJHQWVWRDQ\SHUVRQQRWDQ HPSOR\HHRUOHJDOO\DXWKRUL]HGDJHQWRIWKH3URSRVHUDQGZLOOQRWEHFRPPXQLFDWHGWRDQ\VXFKSHUVRQVSULRUWR'XH'DWHRIWKLV VROLFLWDWLRQ
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

 7KH3URSRVHUZLOOFRPSO\ZLWKDOODSSOLFDEOHSURYLVLRQVRIIHGHUDOVWDWHDQGORFDOODZVUHJXODWLRQVUXOHVDQGRUGHUV  7KH3URSRVHUXQGHUVWDQGVWKDW6RXUFHZHOOZLOOUHMHFW5)3SURSRVDOVWKDWDUHPDUNHGFRQILGHQWLDO RUQRQSXEOLFHWF
HLWKHU
VXEVWDQWLDOO\RULQWKHLUHQWLUHW\8QGHU0LQQHVRWD6WDWXWHV6HFWLRQ VXEGLYLVLRQDOOSURSRVDOVDUHFRQVLGHUHGQRQSXEOLF GDWDXQWLOWKHHYDOXDWLRQLVFRPSOHWHDQGD&RQWUDFWLVDZDUGHG$WWKDWSRLQWSURSRVDOVEHFRPHSXEOLFGDWD0LQQHVRWD6WDWXWHV 6HFWLRQSHUPLWVRQO\FHUWDLQQDUURZO\GHILQHGGDWDWREHFRQVLGHUHGDWUDGHVHFUHWDQGWKXVQRQSXEOLFGDWDXQGHU 0LQQHVRWD
V'DWD3UDFWLFHV$FW
 3URSRVHULWVHPSOR\HHVDJHQWVDQGVXEFRQWUDFWRUVDUHQRW

 ,QFOXGHGRQWKH³6SHFLDOO\'HVLJQDWHG1DWLRQDOVDQG%ORFNHG3HUVRQV´OLVWPDLQWDLQHGE\WKH2IILFHRI)RUHLJQ$VVHWV&RQWURO RIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV'HSDUWPHQWRIWKH7UHDVXU\IRXQGDW KWWSV
ZZZWUHDVXU\JRYRIDFGRZQORDGVVGQOLVWSGI

 ,QFOXGHGRQWKHJRYHUQPHQWZLGHH[FOXVLRQVOLVWVLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV6\VWHPIRU$ZDUG0DQDJHPHQWIRXQGDW

KWWSV
VDPJRY6$0
RU
 3UHVHQWO\GHEDUUHGVXVSHQGHGSURSRVHGIRUGHEDUPHQWGHFODUHGLQHOLJLEOHRUYROXQWDULO\H[FOXGHGIURPSURJUDPVRSHUDWHG Bid Number: RFP 011822 Vendor Name: Lexipol, LLC







 


 





E\WKH6WDWHRI0LQQHVRWD
WKH8QLWHG6WDWHVIHGHUDOJRYHUQPHQWRUWKH&DQDGLDQJRYHUQPHQWDVDSSOLFDEOH RUDQ\
3DUWLFLSDWLQJ(QWLW\9HQGRUFHUWLILHVDQGZDUUDQWVWKDWQHLWKHULWQRULWVSULQFLSDOVKDYHEHHQFRQYLFWHGRIDFULPLQDORIIHQVH UHODWHGWRWKHVXEMHFWPDWWHURIWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ
%\FKHFNLQJWKLVER[,DFNQRZOHGJHWKDW,DPERXQGE\WKHWHUPVRIWKH3URSRVHU¶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
7KH%LGGHUDFNQRZOHGJHVDQGDJUHHVWKDWWKHDGGHQGXPDGGHQGDEHORZIRUPSDUWRIWKH%LG'RFXPHQW &KHFNWKHER[LQWKHFROXPQ,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKLVDGGHQGXPEHORZWRDFNQRZOHGJHHDFKRIWKHDGGHQGD )LOH1DPH
,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKH
EHORZDGGHQGXPDQG
DWWDFKPHQWV
LI

DSSOLFDEOH

3DJHV
$GGHQGXPBB36B7UDLQLQJB6LPXODWLRQB(TSWB7HFKB5)3B
7XH'HFHPEHU
$0 
Bid Number: RFP 011822 Vendor Name: Lexipol, LLC







 


 





City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 20, 2026 ITEM NUMBER: 11F
To: Mayor Tanya Doby & Members of the City Council
Presented By: Ron Noda, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Chris Kelley, City Engineer
Subject: Resolution No. 2026-02 - Pavement Management Plan Update

SUMMARY
The City of Los Alamitos is required to submit eligibility documentation in conformance with criteria stated in the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Ordinance No. 3. As part of the qualifications, a current Pavement Management Plan (PMP) must be in place and maintained to qualify for allocation of Measure M2 (M2) sales tax revenue funds.

In line with these requirements, OCTA reviewed the Pavement Management Plan and submitted a request for revisions. City staff addressed the deficiencies, provided revised inspection certifications that were incorporated into the Pavement Management Plan, and resubmitted the plan to OCTA. The revised plan provided was reviewed and approved by OCTA.

The 2026 Pavement Management Plan requires updating through a resolution of the City Council of the City of Los Alamitos to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in order to remain eligible to receive M2 funds.

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2026-02, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M2 (M2) PROGRAM."

BACKGROUND
The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) requires all local jurisdictions to comply with the eligibility requirements outlined in Ordinance No. 3 to receive Measure M2 local return funds. One of the key requirements is the preparation, adoption, and ongoing maintenance of a current Pavement Management Plan (PMP), which serves as a strategic tool for assessing roadway conditions, prioritizing maintenance and rehabilitation needs, and ensuring the efficient use of transportation funding. The City of Los Alamitos maintains its PMP in accordance with these requirements to preserve eligibility for M2 funding and to support longterm infrastructure planning.

To formalize the updated 2026 Pavement Management Plan and maintain compliance with

OCTA Ordinance No. 3, the City Council must adopt a resolution approving the PMP and authorizing the submittal of the required eligibility verification package. Approval of this item will ensure the City remains eligible to receive Measure M2 funds for transportation-related improvements.

DISCUSSION
Approval of the proposed resolution will formally adopt the updated 2026 Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and ensure the City remains in compliance with the requirements of OCTA Ordinance No. 3. Maintaining an up-to-date PMP is essential for continued eligibility to receive Measure M2 local return funds, which represent a critical funding source for the City’s ongoing street maintenance and rehabilitation efforts. Without an approved PMP, the City would risk losing access to these funds, potentially impacting the condition and longevity of the City’s roadway network.

The updated PMP reflects current pavement conditions and incorporates revised inspection data and certifications as required by OCTA. The plan provides a data-driven framework for prioritizing street improvements, optimizing funding allocations, and implementing costeffective maintenance strategies. By adopting the PMP, the City Council affirms its Fiscal Pledge to proactive infrastructure management, fiscal responsibility, and the preservation of public assets.

FISCAL IMPACT
None.

Attachment: 1. Resolution No. 2026-02 - Pavement Management Plan for the Measure M2 Program

2. Pavement Management Plan - 2025 Update

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA, CONCERNING THE

STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE PAVEMENT
MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M2 (M2)

PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City is required to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in order to remain eligible to receive M2 funds; and,
WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt and update a Pavement Management Plan (PMP), using the required format, regarding the status of road pavement conditions and implementation of the PMP on a biennial basis; and, WHEREAS, the City is required to provide a plan to manage the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance and costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs to improve paved roads.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Los Alamitos, California, finds that the above recitals are true and correct.

SECTION 2. The PMP is in conformance with the PMP Submittal Template provided in the Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines.

SECTION 3. The City hereby adopts a PMP and has provided OCTA with an updated PMP report in the required format.

SECTION 4. The City Engineer or designee is authorized to sign the PMP certification form.

SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April 2026.

Tanya Doby, Mayor

ATTEST:

Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________
Michael S. Daudt, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS )
I, Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk, of the City of Los Alamitos, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 20th day of April, 2026, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:

Windmera Quintanar, MMC, City Clerk

City of Los Alamitos
Pavement
Management Plan
2025 Update
Prepared by: Tyrone Peter
Submitted to OCTA:2-09-2026

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 1
Agency Submittal Table of Contents
I. Pavement Management Plan Certification..................................................................................................... 2 II. Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................... 3 III. Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 IV. Current Pavement Conditions (PCI) ................................................................................................................ 5 V. Projected Pavement Conditions (PCI)............................................................................................................. 5 VI. Alternative Funding Levels.............................................................................................................................. 6 Maintain Existing Average Network PCI.............................................................................................................. 6 Improve Average Network PCI............................................................................................................................ 6 VII. Current and Projected Backlog by Year of Pavement Maintenance Needs.................................................... 7 VIII. Centerline Mileage.......................................................................................................................................... 7 IX. Percentage of Network in Each of Five Condition Categories Based on Centerline Miles ............................. 8 X. Reduction in M2 Local Match ......................................................................................................................... 9 XI. Appendix A – Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Current or Expected Funding Level ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 XII. Appendix B – Complete Street Listing Current Conditions........................................................................... 16 XIII. Appendix C – Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan ................................................................................. 21 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Objectives.......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Structure of QA/QC Plan ................................................................................................................................... 21 Condition Survey Procedures............................................................................................................................ 22 Accuracy Required for Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 23 Random and Systematic Re-Inspections........................................................................................................... 23 PCI Comparison with Past Surveys.................................................................................................................... 24 Inspector’s Qualifications and Experience ........................................................................................................ 24 Safety Procedures ............................................................................................................................................. 25 XIV. Appendix D – Pavement Management Data Files......................................................................................... 26 XV. Appendix E – GIS Maps – Current Conditions............................................................................................... 27

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 2
I. Pavement Management Plan Certification
The City/County of Los Alamitos certifies that it has a Pavement Management Plan in conformance with the criteria stated in the Orange County Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3. This ordinance requires that a Pavement Management Plan be in place and maintained to qualify for allocation of revenues generated from renewed Measure M (M2).

The plan was developed by Willdan* using PAVER, a pavement management system, confirming to American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D6433, and contains, at a minimum, the following elements:
• Inventory of MPAH and local routes reviewed and updated biennially. The last update of the inventory was completed on April, 2023 for Arterial (MPAH) streets and April, 2023 for local streets. • Assessment of pavement condition for all routes in the system, updated biennially. The last field review of pavement condition was completed on January, 2026.
• Percentage of all sections of pavement needing:
o Preventative Maintenance: 33%
o Rehabilitation: 47%
o Reconstruction: 0%
• Budget needs for Preventative Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and/or Reconstruction of deficient sections of pavement for:
o Current biennial period $2,000,000
o Following biennial period $2,000,000
• Funds budgeted or available for Preventative Maintenance, Rehabilitation, and/or Reconstruction:
o Current biennial period $2,050,000
o Following biennial period $2,600,000
• Backlog by year of unfunded pavement rehabilitation, restoration, and reconstruction needs. • The Pavement Management Plan is consistent with countywide pavement condition assessment standards as described in the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines adopted by the OCTA Board of Directors.
*An electronic copy of the Pavement Management Plan (with Micro Paver or StreetSaver compatible files) has been, or will be, submitted with the certification statement.

A copy of this certification is being provided to the Orange County Transportation Authority.

Submitted by:

Chris Kelley California
Name (Print) Jurisdiction
2/09/2026
Signed Date
City Engineer
Title

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 3
II. Executive Summary
The City of Los Alamitos recently completed a comprehensive pavement condition assessment covering approximately 33.90 miles and 7.08 million square feet of roadway surface. The evaluation was conducted in accordance with ASTM D6433-20, utilizing the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) methodology to quantify the condition of the city’s asphalt network. The assessment determined an area-weighted average PCI of 75, placing the overall network in the “Good” category. Observed distresses included block cracking, alligator cracking, utility patching, rutting, potholes, and linear cracking, reflecting a mix of surface aging and deeper structural issues.

The condition distribution revealed that 27% of the network is in Very Good condition and 28% in Good condition, offering opportunities for low-cost preventive maintenance. However, the analysis also found that 30% of the network is in Fair condition, with an additional 15% and 1% in Poor and Very Poor condition, respectively. These findings indicate that more than 16% of the city’s roadway infrastructure has reached advanced stages of deterioration and may require major rehabilitation or full reconstruction if left unaddressed.

To respond effectively, a treatment strategy was developed based on condition severity. Preventive maintenance was recommended for 33% of the network, and rehabilitation was recommended for 47% of the network.

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 4
III. Background
For the Los Alamitos Pavement Project, Willdan Engineering partnered with Bucknam Infrastructure Group to provide specialized pavement engineering services. As part of this collaboration, Bucknam Infrastructure Group conducted a network-level field distress survey, while Willdan was responsible for calculating Pavement Condition Index (PCI) scores for all city-maintained streets using PAVER. Based on the survey data, Willdan prepared a comprehensive professional report summarizing the overall pavement surface condition. The report features a detailed analysis of PCI scores across asphalt concrete (AC) sections, a breakdown of observed surface distresses, and recommended treatment categories for each pavement section. These treatment recommendations are supported by cost estimates and are designed to identify the most effective and costefficient strategies for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation. The report equips stakeholders with a clear, data-driven understanding of current pavement conditions and actionable solutions for preserving and improving the roadway network.

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 5
IV. Current Pavement Conditions (PCI)
Current Network PCI Current MPAH PCI Current Local PCI
75 76 74
V. Projected Pavement Conditions (PCI)
Should be by projected PCI by year under existing or expected funding levels for next seven fiscal years (“Today” is before June 30).

Fiscal Year Current Funding Entire Network
PCI MPAH Local
Today $750,000 75 76 74
2025-26 $1,300,000 79 74 85
2026-27 $1,300,000 80 78 83
2027-28 $1,300,000 81 79 82
2028-29 $1,300,000 81 78 81
2029-30 $1,300,000 81 76 80
2030-31 $1,300,000 81 74 81
2031-32 $1,300,000 81 72 80

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 6
VI. Alternative Funding Levels
Maintain Existing Average Network PCI
Fiscal Year Maintain
Funding
Entire Network
PCI MPAH Local
Today $750,000 75 76 74
2025-26 $1,000,000 78 74 84
2026-27 $1,000,000 77 76 82
2027-28 $1,000,000 77 77 80
2028-29 $1,000,000 77 77 78
2029-30 $1,000,000 77 76 76
2030-31 $1,000,000 77 74 77
2031-32 $1,000,000 76 72 75
Improve Average Network PCI
Fiscal Year Improve Funding Entire Network
PCI MPAH Local
Today $750,000 75 76 74
2025-26 $1,200,000 78 74 84
2026-27 $1,200,000 77 75 82
2027-28 $1,200,000 78 77 80
2028-29 $1,200,000 78 78 78
2029-30 $1,200,000 78 76 77
2030-31 $1,200,000 78 74 78
2031-32 $1,200,000 78 72 77

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 7
VII. Current and Projected Backlog by Year of Pavement Maintenance Needs Fiscal Year Current Funding
Backlog Maintain PCI Backlog Increase PCI Backlog
Current $9,096,364 $9,400,508 $9,279,655
2025-26 $10,737,881 $11,262,654 $11,138,566
2026-27 $12,656,798 $14,006,713 $13,796,849
2027-28 $14,237,985 $16,423,718 $16,104,501
2028-29 $14,792,739 $17,652,931 $16,970,837
2029-30 $14,901,576 $18,147,137 $17,334,788
2030-31 $14,532,860 $18,171,250 $17,245,328
2031-32 $9,096,364 $19,000,456 $18,045,222
VIII. Centerline Mileage
Entire Pavement Network MPAH Local Roads

33.9 12.90 21.0

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 8
IX. Percentage of Network in Each of Five Condition Categories Based on Centerline Miles
Condition
Category PCI Range Network
Percent
Area of
Total
Pavement
Area of
Pavement
(sf)
Percent
Centerline
Mileage of
Network
Centerline
Mileage of
Network
Very Good 86-100
MPAH 3.5% 246,016

26.7%

0.93 Local 20.1% 1,422,431 8.11
Good 75-85
MPAH 21.9% 1,548,216

28.0%

6.62 Local 7.9% 557,274 2.88
Fair 60-74
MPAH 13.5% 956,765

29.6%

3.41 Local 17.1% 1,211,404 6.63
Poor 41-59
MPAH 6.5% 461,648

14.8%

1.79 Local 8.6% 610,356 3.21
Very Poor 0-40
MPAH 0.4% 30,672

1.0%

0.16 Local 0.5% 35,360 0.17

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 9
X. Reduction in M2 Local Match
A local agency match reduction of 10% of the eligible cost for projects submitted for consideration of funding through the M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs (CTFP) call for projects is available if the local agency either:
a. Shows measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one Pavement Condition Index (PCI) point with no reduction in the overall weighted (by area) average PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) or local street categories;
or
b. Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period, within the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in “good condition”.

The City of Los Alamitos has, during the previous reporting period, road pavement conditions within the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher.

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 10
XI. Appendix A – Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Current or Expected Funding Level
MPAH
Street Name From To Length Width Area PCI
Type of
Treatment
Unit
Cost
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Ball Road Bloomfield
St W/S
W City
Limits 1289 80 103,120 72.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $305,235 2027 Bloomfield St Cerritos
Ave S/S
Katella Ave
N/S 2613 60 156,780 74.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $464,069 2027 Bloomfield St N City Limit Cerritos
Ave N/S 3371 65 219,115 83.1 Thin Overlay $2.96 $648,580 2029 Cerritos Ave
Los
Alamitos
Blvd E/S
Bloomfield
St E/S 2608 80 208,640 56.2 2" Grind and Overlay $4.70 $980,608 2026 Cerritos Ave W City
Limit
Los
Alamitos
Blvd E/S
1575 74 116,550 73.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $344,988 2027
Cerritos Ave Bloomfield
St E/S
Santa
Clara St
W/S
1527 80 122,160 71.1 Slurry $0.35 $42,756 2026
Cerritos Ave Bloomfield
St E/S
Lexington
Dr 1111 80 88,880 89.5 Slurry $0.35 $62,216 2026, 2031
Katella Ave
EB
Lexington
Dr E/S Siboney St 3291 37 121,767 68.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $360,430 2027 Katella Ave
EB
Los
Alamitos
Blvd E/S
Bloomfield
St E/S 2643 41 108,363 75.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $320,754 2028 Katella Ave
EB
I-605 Off
Ramp
Los
Alamitos
Blvd W/S
2891 45 130,095 78.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $385,081 2028
Katella Ave
EB
Bloomfield
St E/S
Lexington
Dr E/S 2654 42 111,468 76.5 Slurry $0.35 $39,014 2026
Katella Ave
EB Siboney St Walker St 1984 43 85,312 81.2 Slurry $0.35 $29,859 2026 Katella Ave
WB
Lexington
Dr E/S
Bloomfield
St E/S 2653 42 111,426 59.2 2" Grind and Overlay $4.70 $523,702 2026 Katella Ave
WB
Bloomfield
St E/S
Los
Alamitos
Blvd E/S
2608 40 104,320 66.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $308,787 2027
Katella Ave
WB Siboney St Walker St 1985 43 85,355 77.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $252,651 2028 Katella Ave
WB
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
I-605 On
Ramp 2818 44 123,992 79.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $367,016 2028 Lexington Dr Cerritos
Ave
560' s/o
Corporate
Center Dr
2606 26 67,756 75.7 Thin Overlay $2.96 $200,558 2028
Lexington Dr Katella Ave
S/S
Farquhar
Ave 1312 60 78,720 84.2 Slurry $0.35 $27,552 2026
Los Alamitos
Blvd N/B
Katella Ave
S/S
Farquhar
Ave N/S 1284 47 60,348 61.1 Thin Overlay $2.96 $178,630 2027 Los Alamitos
Blvd N/B
Cerritos
Ave N/S
1300' N/O
Cerritos
Ave
1277 45 57,465 62.6 Thin Overlay $2.96 $170,096 2027

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 11
Street Name From To Length Width Area PCI
Type of
Treatment
Unit
Cost
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Los Alamitos
Blvd N/B
Bradbury
Rd N/S
Rossmoor
Way N/S 1741 37 64,417 75.7 Thin Overlay $2.96 $190,674 2028 Los Alamitos
Blvd N/B
Farquhar
Ave N/S
Katella Ave
S/S 1283 47 60,301 85.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $178,491 2029 Los Alamitos
Blvd N/B
Rossmoor
Way N/S
Farquhar
Ave N/S 2562 45 115,290 76.1 Slurry $0.35 $40,352 2026
Los Alamitos
Blvd N/B Katella Ave Cerritos Ave 2624 47 123,328 85.0 Slurry $0.35 $43,165 2026 Los Alamitos
Blvd S/B
Farquhar
Ave N/S
Rossmoor
Way N/S 2539 45 114,255 71.7 Thin Overlay $2.96 $338,195 2027 Los Alamitos
Blvd S/B
Rossmoor
Way N/S
Bradbury
Rd N/S 1843 38 70,034 79.6 Slurry $0.35 $24,512 2026
Los Alamitos
Blvd S/B
Cerritos
Ave Katella Ave 2629 47 123,563 84.5 Slurry $0.35 $43,247 2026 Los Alamitos
Blvd S/B
1300' N/O
Cerritos
Ave
Cerritos
Ave 1263 45 56,835 90.2 Slurry $0.35 $39,785 2026, 2031 Orangewood
Ave
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
E END 1294 32 41,408 76.5 Slurry $0.35 $14,493 2026

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 12
LOCAL
Street
Name From To Length Width Area PCI
Type of
Treatment
Unit
Cost
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Antietam
Ave
Bennington
St Mindora St 1044 32 33,408 94.6 Slurry $0.35 $23,386 2026, 2031 Barbi Ln N CDS Denwood
Ave 506 32 16,192 91.5 Slurry $0.35 $11,334 2026, 2031
Bennington
St
Antietam
Ave Howard Ave 766 32 24,512 91.4 Slurry $0.35 $17,158 2026, 2031 Bradbury Rd
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
Pine St 965 48 46,320 62.8 Thin Overlay $2.96 $137,107 2028 Bradbury Rd Pine St Cherry St 627 32 20,064 69.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $59,389 2030 Bunkerhill
Dr
Katella
Frontage Rd Howard Ave 1117 32 35,744 81.9 Slurry $0.35 $12,510 2026 Carlsbad Cir W END Satellite Dr 352 22 7,744 98.6 Slurry $0.35 $2,710 2031 Catalina St
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
Reagan St 790 33 26,070 65.0 Thin Overlay $2.96 $77,167 2029 Catalina St Reagan St Cherry St 419 33 13,827 67.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $40,928 2030 Catalina St Walnut St Chestnut St 391 32 12,512 98.3 Slurry $0.35 $4,379 2031 Catalina St Oak St Walnut St 406 32 12,992 98.6 Slurry $0.35 $4,547 2031 Catalina St Chestnut St
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
201 32 6,432 98.6 Slurry $0.35 $2,251 2031
Cherry St N CDS Kempton Dr 2519 32 80,608 72.7 Thin Overlay $2.96 $238,600 2031 Cherry St Catalina St Katella Ave 1082 52 56,261 93.0 Slurry $0.35 $39,383 2026, 2031
Cherry St Farquhar
Ave Thor Ave 1114 33 36,762 95.5 Slurry $0.35 $25,733 2027, 2032 Chestnut St Florista St 320' s/o
Florista St 475 42 19,950 85.1 Slurry $0.35 $6,983 2026 Chestnut St 320' s/o
Florista St Katella Ave 274 52 14,248 86.5 Slurry $0.35 $9,974 2026, 2031 Del Norte
Way Cerritos Ave N CDS 386 30 11,580 94.9 Slurry $0.35 $8,106 2026, 2031 Denwood
Ave Rochelle St Kelly Ln 1049 32 33,568 99.3 Slurry $0.35 $11,749 2031 El Dorado
Way N CDS San Joaquin Ave 378 30 11,340 95.7 Slurry $0.35 $7,938 2027, 2032 Enterprise
Dr Howard Ave S END 153 35 5,355 71.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $15,851 2031 Enterprise
Dr Katella Ave Green Ave 293 35 10,255 88.1 Slurry $0.35 $7,179 2026, 2031 Farquhar
Ave
Lexington
Dr W/S
Bloomfield
St E/S 2651 35 92,785 57.9 2" Grind and Overlay $4.70 $436,090 2028 Farquhar
Ave
Bloomfield
St E/S
Los
Alamitos
Blvd E/S
2600 35 91,000 76.0 Thin Overlay $2.96 $269,360 2032
Fenley Dr W CDS Kaylor Ave 1083 30 32,490 98.1 Slurry $0.35 $11,372 2031 Florista St Oak St
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
1161 52 60,372 74.3 Thin Overlay $2.96 $178,701 2031

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 13
Street
Name From To Length Width Area PCI
Type of
Treatment
Unit
Cost
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Florista St Alley Reagon St 199 52 10,348 92.9 Slurry $0.35 $7,244 2026, 2031
Florista St
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
Pine St 357 52 18,564 93.1 Slurry $0.35 $12,995 2026,
2031
Florista St Reagan St Cherry St 393 52 20,436 94.0 Slurry $0.35 $14,305 2026, 2031
Florista St Pine St Alley 201 52 10,452 95.0 Slurry $0.35 $7,316 2026, 2031
Green Ave Maple St Bloomfield
St 666 33 21,978 58.3 2" Grind and Overlay $4.70 $103,297 2028 Green Ave Bloomfield
St Noel St 1322 33 43,626 62.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $129,133 2029 Green Ave Reagan St Maple St 1191 33 39,303 67.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $116,337 2030 Green Ave
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
Reagan St 761 33 25,113 69.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $74,334 2030 Green Ave Saratoga Dr Midway Dr 1185 35 41,475 79.0 Thin Overlay $2.96 $122,766 2032 Green Ave Midway Dr Ticonderoga
Dr 291 34 9,894 80.0 Thin Overlay $2.96 $29,286 2028
Harrisburg
Rd
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
Reagan St 868 33 28,644 89.8 Slurry $0.35 $20,051 2026, 2031
Holden Cir Fenley Dr NE CDS 582 30 17,460 96.7 Slurry $0.35 $6,111 2028 Howard Ave Maple St Bloomfield
St 660 33 21,780 59.9 2" Grind and Overlay $4.70 $102,366 2028 Howard Ave Lexington
Dr
Enterprise
Dr 1157 35 40,495 62.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $119,865 2029 Howard Ave
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
Reagan St 764 33 25,212 64.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $74,628 2030 Howard Ave Bloomfield
St Noel St 1322 33 43,626 65.6 Thin Overlay $2.96 $129,133 2029 Howard Ave Ticonderoga
Dr
Bennington
St 1100 32 35,200 86.3 Slurry $0.35 $24,640 2026, 2031
Howard Ave Reagan St Maple St 1192 33 39,336 94.6 Slurry $0.35 $27,535 2026, 2031
Howard Ave Bennington
St E END 1246 32 39,872 97.8 Slurry $0.35 $13,955 2030
Humbolt St Myra Ave San Joaquin
Way 1277 37 47,249 88.8 Slurry $0.35 $33,074 2026, 2031 Humbolt St San Joaquin
Way Cerritos Ave 218 37 8,066 89.0 Slurry $0.35 $5,646 2026, 2031 Interior Cir Lampson
Frontage Rd N END 382 22 8,404 97.4 Slurry $0.35 $2,941 2030 Katella
Frontage Rd
Ticonderoga
Dr E END 897 30 26,910 92.2 Slurry $0.35 $18,837 2026, 2031 Kaylor Ave Ball Rd Toland Cir 159 30 4,770 96.7 Slurry $0.35 $1,670 2028 Kaylor Ave Toland Cir Fenley Dr 542 30 16,260 96.7 Slurry $0.35 $5,691 2028 Kearsarge
Ave
Bennington
St Mindora St 1059 32 33,888 96.0 Slurry $0.35 $23,722 2027, 2032 Kelly Ln N CDS Denwood
Ave 486 32 15,552 96.6 Slurry $0.35 $10,886 2027, 2032
Kings St Myra Ave San Mateo
Ave 1112 37 41,144 92.5 Slurry $0.35 $28,801 2026, 2031

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 14
Street
Name From To Length Width Area PCI
Type of
Treatment
Unit
Cost
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Kyle St Kinmount St S CDS 248 32 7,936 89.7 Slurry $0.35 $5,555 2026, 2031
La Colmena
Way Pine St E CDS 679 32 21,728 74.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $64,315 2027 Langley Dr Green Ave Howard Ave 947 35 33,145 69.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $98,109 2030 Lassen St N CDS San Joaquin
Way 220 33 7,260 88.7 Slurry $0.35 $5,082 2026, 2031
Linda Way N CDS Denwood
Ave 508 32 16,256 94.3 Slurry $0.35 $11,379 2026, 2031
Los
Vaqueros Cerritos Ave SW CDS 948 36 34,128 72.2 Slurry $0.35 $11,945 2026 Maple St Kinmount St S CDS 250 32 8,000 92.8 Slurry $0.35 $5,600 2026, 2031
Marion Ave Kings St E CDS 365 33 12,045 90.0 Slurry $0.35 $8,432 2026, 2031
Midway Dr Katella Ave Green Ave 291 35 10,185 85.3 Thin Overlay $2.96 $30,148 2029 Mindora St Antietam
Ave Howard Ave 731 32 23,392 96.7 Slurry $0.35 $8,187 2028 Myra Ave Humbolt St E CDS 703 33 23,199 90.2 Slurry $0.35 $16,239 2026, 2031
Noel St NE CDS Katella Ave 836 42 35,112 98.6 Slurry $0.35 $12,289 2031 Paseo
Bonita Bradbury Rd Kempton Dr 775 32 24,800 64.0 Thin Overlay $2.96 $73,408 2030 Paseo
Bonita N CDS Rossmoor Way 462 32 14,784 66.0 Thin Overlay $2.96 $43,761 2029 Paseo
Bonita
Rossmoor
Way Bradbury Rd 1747 32 55,904 72.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $165,476 2031 Pine St Rossmoor
Way Kempton 2272 32 72,704 63.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $215,204 2029 Pine St Florista St 175' s/o
Florista St 175 32 5,600 67.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $16,576 2030 Pine St 175' s/o
Florista St Katella Ave 461 45 20,745 71.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $61,405 2032 Pine St La Colmena
Way
Rossmoor
Way 1056 32 33,792 72.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $100,024 2030 Pine St Catalina St Florista St 490 53 25,970 88.4 Slurry $0.35 $18,179 2026, 2031
Rainier Cir Lampson
Frontage Rd N END 385 22 8,470 99.4 Slurry $0.35 $2,965 2031 Ranger Dr Katella
Frontage Rd Howard Ave 1105 32 35,360 70.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $104,666 2032 Reagan St Bradbury Rd Kempton Dr 1114 32 35,648 66.7 Thin Overlay $2.96 $105,518 2030 Reagan St La Colmena
Way
Rossmoor
Way 1033 32 33,056 69.6 Thin Overlay $2.96 $97,846 2030 Reagan St Briggeman
Dr Catalina St 843 36 30,348 70.2 Thin Overlay $2.96 $89,830 2030 Reagan St Rossmoor
Way Bradbury Rd 1150 32 36,800 72.7 Thin Overlay $2.96 $108,928 2031 Reagan St Catalina St Katela Ave 1128 53 59,784 78.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $176,961 2032 Reagan St Farquhar
Ave
Harrisburg
Ave 834 33 27,522 92.4 Slurry $0.35 $19,265 2026, 2031
Rossmoor
Way
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
Pine St 1015 44 44,660 62.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $132,194 2029

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 15
Street
Name From To Length Width Area PCI
Type of
Treatment
Unit
Cost
Cost of
Treatment
Year of
Treatment
Rossmoor
Way Pine St Cherry St 625 32 20,000 74.1 Slurry $0.35 $7,000 2026 San Bonito
Ave Kings St Bloomfield St 638 37 23,606 91.0 Slurry $0.35 $16,524 2026, 2031 San Jaoquin
St Humbolt St E CDS 273 33 9,009 87.4 Slurry $0.35 $6,306 2026, 2031 San Jaoquin
St Lassen St Humbolt St 186 33 6,138 92.1 Slurry $0.35 $4,297 2026, 2031 San Jaoquin
St
El Dorado
Way
Del Norte
Way 245 30 7,350 96.7 Slurry $0.35 $2,573 2028
San Mateo
Ave Humbolt St E CDS 610 33 20,130 91.6 Slurry $0.35 $14,091 2026, 2031 Saratoga Dr Katella Ave Howard Ave 1237 35 43,295 75.7 Thin Overlay $2.96 $128,153 2032 Satellite Dr Olympic Dr Lampson
Frontage Rd 610 28 17,080 99.4 Slurry $0.35 $5,978 2031 Sausalito St Chestnut St
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
308 33 10,164 59.3 2" Grind and
Overlay $4.70 $47,771 2028
Serpentine
Dr
Los
Alamitos
Blvd
Reagan St 801 32 25,632 69.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $75,871 2026 Shasta Ave Kings St E CDS 457 33 15,081 89.5 Slurry $0.35 $10,557 2026, 2031
Siboney St Antietam
Ave N/S
Katella Ave
S/S 381 32 12,192 89.3 Slurry $0.35 $8,534 2026, 2031
Sierra Cir N CDS Cerritos Ave 293 33 9,669 66.2 Thin Overlay $2.96 $28,620 2030 Snark St N END Harrisburg
Ave 129 33 4,257 58.2 2" Grind and Overlay $4.70 $20,008 2028 Snark St Harrisburg
Rd Thor Ave 231 33 7,623 97.1 Slurry $0.35 $2,668 2029
Thor Ave Snark St Cherry St 953 33 31,449 98.8 Slurry $0.35 $11,007 2031 Ticonderoga
Dr Katella Ave Howard Ave 1262 32 40,384 70.8 Thin Overlay $2.96 $119,537 2031 Toland Ave Fenley Dr Kaylor Ave 1205 30 36,150 96.7 Slurry $0.35 $12,653 2028 Toland Cir Kaylor Ave E CDS 581 30 17,430 96.0 Slurry $0.35 $12,201 2027, 2032
Tripoli Ave Bennington
St Mindora St 1064 32 34,048 97.8 Slurry $0.35 $11,917 2030 Via El
Mercado Katella Ave S CDS 334 46 15,364 81.5 Slurry $0.35 $5,377 2026 Vista De
Ora Reagan St E CDS 411 32 13,152 78.6 Slurry $0.35 $4,603 2026 Walnut St Florista St Katella Ave
N/S 586 56 32,816 78.0 Slurry $0.35 $11,486 2026
Winners Cir Katella Ave S CDS 789 42 33,138 57.8 2" Grind and Overlay $4.70 $155,749 2027

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 16
XII. Appendix B – Complete Street Listing Current Conditions MPAH
Street Name From To
Width of
Segment Area
Current
PCI
Most Recent
Inspection Date
Ball Road Bloomfield St W/S W City Limits 80 103,120 73 12/29/25 Bloomfield St Cerritos Ave S/S Katella Ave N/S 60 156,780 74 11/17/25 Bloomfield St N City Limit Cerritos Ave N/S 65 219,115 83 12/29/25 Bloomfield St Katella Ave Farquhar Ave 32 40,000 100 12/29/25 Calle Lee Cerritos Ave SW CDS 36 33,012 46 12/22/25
Cerritos Ave Los Alamitos Blvd E/S Bloomfield St E/S 80 208,640 56 12/30/25 Cerritos Ave Bloomfield St E/S Santa Clara St W/S 80 122,160 71 11/18/25 Cerritos Ave W City Limit Los Alamitos Blvd E/S 74 116,550 74 12/30/25 Cerritos Ave Bloomfield St E/S Lexington Dr 80 88,880 90 11/18/25 Corporate Center Calle Lee Lexington Dr 36 30,672 40 11/17/25 Katella Ave EB Lexington Dr E/S Siboney St 37 121,767 69 12/29/25 Katella Ave EB Los Alamitos Blvd E/S Bloomfield St E/S 41 108,363 76 12/30/25 Katella Ave EB Bloomfield St E/S Lexington Dr E/S 42 111,468 77 11/18/25 Katella Ave EB I-605 Off Ramp Los Alamitos Blvd W/S 45 130,095 79 12/30/25 Katella Ave EB Siboney St Walker St 43 85,312 81 11/18/25 Katella Ave WB Siboney St E/S Lexington Dr E/S 33 108,570 46 12/29/25 Katella Ave WB Lexington Dr E/S Bloomfield St E/S 42 111,426 59 11/18/25 Katella Ave WB Bloomfield St E/S Los Alamitos Blvd E/S 40 104,320 67 12/30/25 Katella Ave WB Siboney St Walker St 43 85,355 77 11/18/25 Katella Ave WB Los Alamitos Blvd I-605 On Ramp 44 123,992 79 12/30/25 Lexington Dr Cerritos Ave
560' s/o Corporate
Center Dr 26 67,756 76 12/29/25
Lexington Dr Katella Ave S/S Farquhar Ave 60 78,720 84 12/29/25 Los Alamitos Blvd
N/B Katella Ave S/S Farquhar Ave N/S 47 60,348 61 11/18/25 Los Alamitos Blvd
N/B Cerritos Ave N/S 1300' N/O Cerritos Ave 45 57,465 63 12/29/25 Los Alamitos Blvd
N/B Bradbury Rd N/S Rossmoor Way N/S 37 64,417 76 12/23/25 Los Alamitos Blvd
N/B Rossmoor Way N/S Farquhar Ave N/S 45 115,290 76 12/23/25 Los Alamitos Blvd
N/B Katella Ave Cerritos Ave 47 123,328 85 12/30/25
Los Alamitos Blvd
N/B Farquhar Ave N/S Katella Ave S/S 47 60,301 86 11/18/25 Los Alamitos Blvd S/B Farquhar Ave N/S Rossmoor Way N/S 45 114,255 72 12/22/25 Los Alamitos Blvd S/B Rossmoor Way N/S Bradbury Rd N/S 38 70,034 80 12/22/25 Los Alamitos Blvd S/B Cerritos Ave Katella Ave 47 123,563 85 12/30/25 Los Alamitos Blvd S/B 1300' N/O Cerritos Ave Cerritos Ave 45 56,835 90 12/29/25 Orangewood Ave Los Alamitos Blvd E END 32 41,408 77 11/17/25

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 17
LOCAL
Street Name From To
Width of
Segment Area
Current
PCI
Most Recent
Inspection Date
Antietam Ave Bennington St Mindora St 32 33,408 95 12/22/25 Apollo Cir Lunar Dr E END 22 616 100 12/22/25
Barbi Ln N CDS Denwood Ave 32 16,192 92 12/23/25
Bennington St Antietam Ave Howard Ave 32 24,512 91 12/22/25 Bradbury Rd Los Alamitos Blvd Pine St 48 46,320 63 12/22/25 Bradbury Rd Pine St Cherry St 32 20,064 69 12/22/25
Briggeman Dr Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 32 24,448 40 12/22/25 Briggeman Dr Reagan St E END 26 8,476 45 12/22/25
Bunkerhill Dr Katella Frontage Rd Howard Ave 32 35,744 82 12/22/25 Carlsbad Cir W END Satellite Dr 22 7,744 99 12/22/25
Catalina St Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 33 26,070 65 11/17/25 Catalina St Reagan St Cherry St 33 13,827 68 12/29/25
Catalina St Walnut St Chestnut St 32 12,512 98 12/29/25 Catalina St Oak St Walnut St 32 12,992 99 12/29/25
Catalina St Chestnut St Los Alamitos Blvd 32 6,432 99 12/29/25 Catalina St Cherry St Kyle St 36 35,208 100 11/17/25
Cherry St N CDS Kempton Dr 32 80,608 73 12/22/25
Cherry St Catalina St Katella Ave 52 56,261 93 12/29/25 Cherry St Farquhar Ave Thor Ave 33 36,762 96 12/23/25
Chestnut St Catalina St Florista St 42 26,082 35 12/30/25 Chestnut St Cerritos Ave Catalina St 33 44,418 46 12/30/25 Chestnut St Florista St 320' s/o Florista St 42 19,950 85 12/30/25 Chestnut St 320' s/o Florista St Katella Ave 52 14,248 87 12/30/25 Del Norte Way Cerritos Ave N CDS 30 11,580 95 12/22/25
Denwood Ave Rochelle St Kelly Ln 32 33,568 99 12/23/25
El Dorado Way N CDS San Joaquin Ave 30 11,340 96 12/22/25 Enterprise Dr Howard Ave S END 35 5,355 72 12/29/25
Enterprise Dr Green Ave Howard Ave 35 31,850 77 12/29/25 Enterprise Dr Katella Ave Green Ave 35 10,255 88 12/22/25 Essex Dr Green Ave Howard Ave 35 31,850 73 12/29/25
Farnham Ave N City Limit Kinmount St 30 7,890 100 12/22/25 Farquhar Ave Lexington Dr W/S Bloomfield St E/S 35 92,785 58 11/17/25 Farquhar Ave Bloomfield St E/S Los Alamitos Blvd E/S 35 91,000 76 12/23/25 Fenley Dr W CDS Kaylor Ave 30 32,490 98 12/22/25
Florista St Kyle St Bloomfield St 36 18,252 36 11/17/25 Florista St Oak St Los Alamitos Blvd 52 60,372 74 12/29/25 Florista St Alley Reagon St 52 10,348 93 12/29/25
Florista St Los Alamitos Blvd Pine St 52 18,564 93 12/29/25 Florista St Reagan St Cherry St 52 20,436 94 12/29/25

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 18
Florista St Pine St Alley 52 10,452 95 12/29/25
Glacier Cir Olympic Dr S END 22 8,250 100 12/22/25
Green Ave Noel St Lexington Dr 33 43,989 48 11/17/25
Green Ave Maple St Bloomfield St 33 21,978 58 12/23/25
Green Ave Bloomfield St Noel St 33 43,626 62 12/23/25
Green Ave Reagan St Maple St 33 39,303 68 12/23/25
Green Ave Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 33 25,113 70 12/23/25 Green Ave Saratoga Dr Midway Dr 35 41,475 79 12/29/25
Green Ave Midway Dr Ticonderoga Dr 34 9,894 80 12/29/25 Harrisburg Rd Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 33 28,644 90 12/23/25 Holden Cir Fenley Dr NE CDS 30 17,460 97 12/22/25
Howard Ave Maple St Bloomfield St 33 21,780 60 12/23/25 Howard Ave Lexington Dr Enterprise Dr 35 40,495 62 12/29/25 Howard Ave Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 33 25,212 65 12/23/25 Howard Ave Bloomfield St Noel St 33 43,626 66 12/23/25
Howard Ave Enterprise Dr Ticonderoga Dr 35 21,875 77 12/29/25 Howard Ave Noel St Lexington Dr 30 26,280 86 12/23/25
Howard Ave Ticonderoga Dr Bennington St 32 35,200 86 12/29/25 Howard Ave Reagan St Maple St 33 39,336 95 12/23/25
Howard Ave Bennington St E END 32 39,872 98 12/29/25
Humbolt St Cerritos Ave SE CDS 40 49,040 62 11/17/25
Humbolt St Myra Ave San Joaquin Way 37 47,249 89 11/17/25 Humbolt St San Joaquin Way Cerritos Ave 37 8,066 89 11/17/25 Interior Cir Lampson Frontage Rd N END 22 8,404 97 12/22/25 Katella Frontage Rd Ticonderoga Dr E END 30 26,910 92 12/22/25 Kaylor Ave Katella Ave Catalina St 36 32,508 36 11/17/25 Kaylor Ave Toland Cir Fenley Dr 30 16,260 97 12/22/25
Kaylor Ave Ball Rd Toland Cir 30 4,770 97 12/22/25
Kaylor Ave Ball Rd North City Limit 30 4,650 100 12/22/25 Kearsarge Ave Bennington St Mindora St 32 33,888 96 12/22/25 Kelly Ln N CDS Denwood Ave 32 15,552 97 12/23/25
Kempton Dr Paseo Bonita Cherry St 32 31,584 74 12/22/25 Kings St Myra Ave San Mateo Ave 37 41,144 93 11/17/25
Kinmount St Maple St Farnham Ave 30 15,330 100 1/2/26
Kyle St Catalina St Florista St 36 14,040 54 11/17/25
Kyle St Kinmount St S CDS 32 7,936 90 12/22/25
La Colmena Way Pine St E CDS 32 21,728 75 12/22/25
Lampson Frontage
Rd Lunar Dr Satellite Dr 28 23,828 100
12/22/25
Langley Dr Green Ave Howard Ave 35 33,145 70 12/29/25
Lassen St N CDS San Joaquin Way 33 7,260 89 12/22/25
Linda Way N CDS Denwood Ave 32 16,256 94 12/23/25

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 19
Los Vaqueros Cerritos Ave SW CDS 36 34,128 72 12/22/25
Lunar Dr Olympic Dr Lampson Frontage Rd 28 16,800 100 12/22/25 Maple St Kinmount St S CDS 32 8,000 93 12/22/25
Maple St Katella Ave Farquhar Ave 32 40,000 100 12/29/25 Maple St Farquhar Ave Denwood Ave 32 19,136 100 3/16/25 Marion Ave Kings St E CDS 33 12,045 90 12/22/25
Midway Dr Green Ave Howard Ave 35 31,850 80 12/29/25
Midway Dr Katella Ave Green Ave 35 10,185 85 12/29/25
Mindora St Antietam Ave Howard Ave 32 23,392 97 12/22/25 Myra Ave Humbolt St E CDS 33 23,199 90 11/17/25
Noel St Katella Ave Farquhar Ave 32 41,472 80 12/29/25
Noel St NE CDS Katella Ave 42 35,112 99 12/22/25
Oak St Sausalito St Catalina St 46 30,314 34 11/17/25
Oak St Catalina St Katella Ave 46 60,306 49 11/17/25
Olympic Dr Lunar Dr Satellite Dr 28 23,520 98 12/22/25
Paseo Bonita Bradbury Rd Kempton Dr 32 24,800 64 12/22/25 Paseo Bonita N CDS Rossmoor Way 32 14,784 66 12/22/25
Paseo Bonita Rossmoor Way Bradbury Rd 32 55,904 73 12/22/25 Pine St Farquhar Ave Harrisburg Ave 33 28,512 56 12/23/25 Pine St Rossmoor Way Kempton 32 72,704 64 12/22/25
Pine St Florista St 175' s/o Florista St 32 5,600 68 11/17/25 Pine St 175' s/o Florista St Katella Ave 45 20,745 72 11/17/25 Pine St La Colmena Way Rossmoor Way 32 33,792 73 12/22/25 Pine St Catalina St Florista St 53 25,970 88 11/17/25
Portal Dr NW CDS Katella Ave 40 35,360 31 12/22/25
Rainier Cir Lampson Frontage Rd N END 22 8,470 99 12/22/25 Ranger Dr Katella Frontage Rd Howard Ave 32 35,360 71 12/22/25 Reagan St Katella Ave Farquhar Ave 32 41,536 54 12/29/25 Reagan St Bradbury Rd Kempton Dr 32 35,648 67 12/22/25
Reagan St La Colmena Way Rossmoor Way 32 33,056 70 12/22/25 Reagan St Briggeman Dr Catalina St 36 30,348 70 12/29/25 Reagan St Rossmoor Way Bradbury Rd 32 36,800 73 12/22/25 Reagan St Catalina St Katela Ave 53 59,784 79 12/29/25
Reagan St Farquhar Ave Harrisburg Ave 33 27,522 92 12/23/25 Rochelle St Farquhar Ave Denwood Ave 32 18,848 100 12/23/25 Rossmoor Way Los Alamitos Blvd Pine St 44 44,660 62 12/22/25 Rossmoor Way Pine St Cherry St 32 20,000 74 12/22/25
San Bonito Ave Kings St Bloomfield St 37 23,606 91 11/17/25 San Jaoquin St Humbolt St E CDS 33 9,009 87 12/22/25
San Jaoquin St Lassen St Humbolt St 33 6,138 92 12/22/25 San Jaoquin St El Dorado Way Del Norte Way 30 7,350 97 12/22/25 San Mateo Ave Humbolt St E CDS 33 20,130 92 12/22/25

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 20
Saratoga Dr Katella Ave Howard Ave 35 43,295 76 12/29/25 Satellite Dr Olympic Dr Lampson Frontage Rd 28 17,080 99 12/22/25 Sausalito St Oak St Walnut St 33 14,025 39 11/17/25
Sausalito St Walnut St Chestnut St 33 13,035 44 11/17/25 Sausalito St Chestnut St Los Alamitos Blvd 33 10,164 59 12/29/25 Serpentine Dr Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 32 25,632 70 12/22/25 Shasta Ave Kings St E CDS 33 15,081 90 12/22/25
Siboney St Antietam Ave N/S Katella Ave S/S 32 12,192 89 12/22/25 Sierra Cir N CDS Cerritos Ave 33 9,669 66 12/22/25
Snark St N END Harrisburg Ave 33 4,257 58 12/23/25
Snark St Harrisburg Rd Thor Ave 33 7,623 97 12/23/25
Tarawa Dr Katella Frontage Rd Howard Ave 32 35,840 80 12/22/25 Thor Ave Snark St Cherry St 33 31,449 99 12/23/25
Ticonderoga Dr Katella Ave Howard Ave 32 40,384 71 12/29/25 Toland Ave Fenley Dr Kaylor Ave 30 36,150 97 12/22/25
Toland Cir Kaylor Ave E CDS 30 17,430 96 12/22/25
Tripoli Ave Bennington St Mindora St 32 34,048 98 12/22/25 Via El Mercado Katella Ave S CDS 46 15,364 82 12/29/25
Vicksburg Cir Olympic Dr S END 22 6,776 96 12/22/25
Vista De Ora Reagan St E CDS 32 13,152 79 12/22/25
Walnut St Sausalito St Catalina St 33 21,648 49 12/29/25 Walnut St Catalina St Florista St 43 26,445 51 12/29/25 Walnut St Florista St Katella Ave N/S 56 32,816 78 12/29/25 Winners Cir Katella Ave S CDS 42 33,138 58 12/22/25

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 21
XIII. Appendix C – Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Introduction
When performing data collection in any field, the need for quality control is paramount as it is essential for accurate planning, analysis and design. This is particularly true for collecting pavement distress data for a pavement management system.

The Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan establishes minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for updates of the pavement management system.

If applicable, utilize the space below to include information on the agency’s QA/QC policies:

Willdan received pavement distress data from Bucknam Infrastructure Group, collected during the field evaluation process in accordance with ASTM D6433-20 standards.

Objectives
This document constitutes a formal QA/QC Plan for the City of Los Alamitos. It was prepared on 10/2/2025 and last revised on 2/09/2026.

Specifically, it is intended for the 2025 Pavement Management Plan Update. The focus is on the collection of network-level pavement distress data (defined by National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 401 Quality Management of Pavement Data Collection, as “Network-level data collection involves collection of large quantities of pavement condition data, which is often converted to individual condition indices or aggregated into composite condition indices.”)
This document also addresses the QA/QC plan requirements of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)’s “Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines” (section 2.4), adopted in May 2010.

Structure of QA/QC Plan
The following components are addressed in this QA/QC Plan:
• Condition survey procedures used
• Accuracy required for data collection
• Inspector qualifications and experience
• Safety

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 22
Condition Survey Procedures
The governing document in performing condition surveys for the City of Los Alamitos is ASTM D6433 “Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Surveys.” Both asphalt concrete (AC) and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are included in this protocol. The following distresses are collected for each pavement type.

Asphalt Concrete AC Pavements

1. Alligator (fatigue) cracking

2. Bleeding

3. Block cracking

4. Bumps and sags

5. Corrugation

6. Depression

7. Edge cracking

8. Joint reflection cracking

9. Lane/Shoulder drop off

10. Longitudinal & Transverse cracking

11. Patching and utility cut patching

12. Polished aggregate

13. Potholes

14. Railroad crossing

15. Rutting

16. Shoving

17. Slippage cracking

18. Swell

19. Weathering

20. Raveling
Portland Cement Concrete (Jointed)

1. Blowup/buckling

2. Corner breaks

3. Divided slab

4. Durability (“D”) cracking

5. Faulting

6. Joint seal damage

7. Lane/shoulder drop off

8. Linear cracking

9. Patching (large) and utility cuts

10. Patching (small)

11. Polished aggregate

12. Popouts

13. Pumping

14. Punchout

15. Railroad crossing

16. Scaling, map cracking and crazing

17. Shrinkage cracks

18. Spalling (corner)

19. Spalling (joint)
Any exceptions to the above procedures are discussed before any surveys are performed. They are documented in the paragraphs below.
[Note to agency: these are usually related to distresses or situations that are not covered in the manuals.

Examples include roller check marks or edge cracking on streets with no curbs and gutters. Others include the raveling of surface seals or the use of open-graded asphalt concrete mixes where the surface appears to have large voids present. Any modifications must be documented and included in this document. Photos are extremely helpful.]
All surveys are performed as manual surveys, and a minimum 10% sampling rate is utilized. Field crews are typically composed of a one-person crew (Typically a one-person crew on residential streets and some collectors, and up to two-person crews for major arterials, depending on traffic volumes and speeds. Edit as appropriate).

The safety of field personnel is paramount in all instances.

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 23
The sample unit selected must be representative of the entire pavement section. This assumes that the section is homogenous; if it is not homogeneous, then the section must be split according to the criteria agreed upon by the agency. Typically, the criteria used are:
• Pavement condition
• Construction age, if known
• Maintenance history, if known
• Traffic volumes (or functional classification as a surrogate) • Surface types (e.g. asphalt concrete or Portland cement concrete) • Geometric elements (e.g. widths)
Any modifications to the section inventory data are documented in the pavement management report.

A sample unit must be between 2,500 ± 1,000 square feet in conformance with ASTM D6433 protocols. Typical sample unit dimensions are 100 feet long by the width of the street. Streets that are wider than 40 feet wide will have shorter lengths (generally 50 feet) or if they are divided by a raised median, separate sample units will be taken in each direction.

Any pavement areas that are not representative of the section will be noted and surveyed as an additional sample unit.

Accuracy Required for Data Collection
The accuracy required for data collection has two components, both of which are further described in the following paragraphs.
• Re-inspections
• PCI comparisons with past surveys
Random and Systematic Re-Inspections
Random Re-inspections
Random re-inspections will include a representative selection across the following categories:
• Functional classes (i.e. MPAH, locals);
• Surface types (e.g. asphalt concrete or Portland cement concrete); • Pavement conditions (e.g. good, fair, poor);
• Inspectors;
• Geographical areas, if applicable.

Systematic Re-inspections
For systematic re-inspections, this could be due to noticed trends such as specific treatment types (e.g. opengraded mixes), a specific inspector or geographical area. In such cases, more than 5% will be re-inspected.

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 24
Acceptability Criteria
At the time of re-inspection, the actual distresses will be re-inspected and verified, and any corrections made, if necessary. Distress types and severities must be the same and re-measured quantities within ±10% of the original measured quantity.

If corrections are required on more than 10% of the re-inspected sample unit, then an additional 5% will be reinspected. This will continue until more than 95% of the re-inspected sections meet the acceptability criteria.

PCI Comparison with Past Surveys
As another level of quality control, the new PCIs are compared with the previous PCIs. If they differ by more than ±10 PCI points, these sections are automatically flagged for further investigation.

If PCI Increases 10 points
The section is investigated to see if a maintenance and rehabilitation event has occurred since the last survey, but has not been recorded. Typically, it may include activities such as:
• Crack sealing activities – changes medium or high severity cracking to low severity • Patching activities – alligator cracking that has been removed and patched, so that the resultant PCI is increased.
• Surface seals
• Overlay
• Others
Therefore, an up to date maintenance and rehabilitation history file in the pavement management database is desirable, both for historical accuracy as well as to provide additional quality control.

If PCI decreases 10 points
The section is checked to see if the average deterioration rate (usually 3 to 4 points per year) is exceeded. If the drop in PCI is within range of what is acceptable, no further action is required. If the drop is more than the acceptable range, a re-inspection will be performed. The default performance curves in the pavement management software form the basis for what is acceptable.

Inspector’s Qualifications and Experience
The City of Los Alamitos inspectors have attended formal training on pavement condition distress surveys. This training was conducted prior to performing any work using the ASTM D6433 protocols, consistent with OCTA’s requirements.

Inspector Name Date of ASTM D6433 Training Training Conducted By:

Cade Bucknam
Resumes of the technicians utilized on this project are included as an attachment. 2025 West Coast EC

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 25
Safety Procedures
The City of Los Alamitos administers a health and safety program in compliance with the Cal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Title VIII, Section 3203. The program is attached.

Generally, the safety procedures include (Edit as applicable to agency):
• Inspectors to wear Class 2 or 3 safety vest at all times; • Flashing beacon on all vehicles utilized for surveys; and • Stopped vehicles to be parked at locations away from moving traffic (e.g. nearby parking, shoulders, etc.).

On streets where there is a high volume of traffic or high speeds, additional measures may be necessary, such as:
• Surveys to occur during off-peak periods or on weekends; • Additional inspector to watch out for traffic; and
• Traffic flaggers in extreme cases.

Attachment – Appendix C: Resumes of Field Inspectors
---End of QA/QC Plan---

OCTA Pavement Inspector Prequalification Program. Valid through June 30, 2027 Proficient in conducting pavement distress surveys using ASTM standards.

Bachelor of Arts in Broadcast Journalism August 2017- May 2021 California State University, Fullerton
KLUTCH SPORTS GROUP, LLC. | Multimedia Content Associate December 2023- February 2024
Shot and edited content used for company-wide social media platforms.

Developed and executed multimedia content strategies for professional athletes and brand partners.

Collaborated on high-impact visual storytelling projects across digital platforms Bucknam Infrastructure Group May 2016 - Present
Managed pavement databases for more than 50 Orange County and Los Angeles County cities.

Over 9 years of sampled pavement surveys and PCI calculations using ASTM standards.

Created PCI reports from MicroPAVER and StreetSaver to be used by clients for budgeting.

Certified pavement inspector through OCTA with a focused background in asphalt and concrete evaluation. Proven expertise in identifying distress types, severity levels, and providing data-driven maintenance recommendations to extend infrastructure lifespan and ensure regulatory compliance.

CADE BUCKNAM
Mission Viejo, CA | [email protected]

PAVEMENT INSPECTOR

AREA OF EXPERTISE

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE

EDUCATION

CERTIFICATIONS
Microsoft 365
Adobe Creative Suite
MicroPAVER
StreetSaver
ASTM D6433
REP 1 Sports Agency | Multimedia Content Associate
May 2020- December 2023
Managed all social media content across three professional sports.

Utilized Adobe Creative apps to produce marketing decks for contract negotiations.

Company photographer, videographer, and graphic designer.

CERTIFICATE
Cade Bucknam
This certificate has been
presented to
for successfully meeting the requirements of the
OCTA 2025 Pavement Inspector Prequalification Program
using MANUAL survey techniques
Expiration:

6.30.2027
www.WestCoastEC.com/OCTA
Of Prequalification

8/16/2024-SSHSP_JSA-AHA_generator1.xlsm Activity Hazard Analysis - Page 1 of 2

ACTIVITY HAZARD ANALYSIS (AHA)
Activity/Work Task: Site reconnaissance, surface mapping Overall Risk Assessment Code (RAC) (use highest code): L Project Location: Orange County Risk Assessment Code (RAC) Matrix Contract No.: N/A Severity Probability
Date Prepared:1/26/26 Frequent Likely Occasional Seldom Unlikely Prepared by: Matthew Crim, Supervising Engineer
(Name/Title)
Catastrophic E E H H M
Critical E H H M L
Reviewed by: Tyrone Peter, Director of Engineering
(Name/Title)
Marginal H M M L L
Negligible M L L L L
Notes: (Field notes, Review Comments, Etc.)
• Description: surface mapping, site reconnaissance
• Req'd Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): safety glasses, hard hat, high visibility vest, safety toe boots, work gloves, ear plugs
Step 1: Review each “Hazard” with identified safety
“Controls” and determine RAC (See above)
“Probability” is the likelihood to cause an incident,
near miss, or accident and identified as: Frequent,
Likely, Occasional, Seldom or Unlikely.
“Severity” is the outcome/degree if an incident, near
miss, or accident did occur and identified as:

Catastrophic, Critical, Marginal, or Negligible
Step 2: Identify the RAC (Probability/Severity) as E,
H, M, or L for each “Hazard” on AHA. Annotate the
overall highest RAC at the top of AHA.

RAC Chart
E = Extremely High Risk
H = High Risk
M = Moderate Risk
L = Low Risk
Job Steps Hazards Controls RAC
Travel to and from site. 1. Vehicle breakdown 1. • Confirm that vehicle is in good condition before operating. L

2. Improper operation of vehicle 2. • Only employees with a valid drivers license shall operate vehicles. L

3. Injury due to vehicular accident 3. • Confirm that vehicle is in good condition before operating. • Check that mirrors, seat belts, and controls are adjusted correctly. • All vehicle occupants shall wear seat belts.
• Do not use cell phone while driving.
• Use defensive driving techniques.
• Obey traffic rules and speed limits.

L
General work on site. 1. Eye or head injury, hearing loss, cuts and abrasians

1. • Wear appropriate clothing and required Personal Protective Equipment (see top of form for required PPE).

L

2. Injury from distraction or collision 2. • Confirm that you can be seen by traffic, pedestrians, and/or onlookers. L

3. Dehydration, fatigue, disorientation 3. • Stay hydrated and keep your body fueled (eat regularly). L

4. Fatigue, overexertion 4. • Take breaks, as necessary. L Walking around site 1. Sprains, strains, broken bones 1. • Wear appropriate foot protection. L

8/16/2024-SSHSP_JSA-AHA_generator1.xlsm Activity Hazard Analysis - Page 2 of 2 Job Steps Hazards Controls RAC

2. Slips, trips, falls 2. • Use caution when working on uneven and wet ground surfaces. • Keep work area clear of debris, tools, and other materials that are not in use.

L
Performing field
reconnaissance

1. Sprains, strains, broken bones 1. • Watch out for soft ground areas and/or holes when you are walking. • Wear appropriate foot and ankle protection.

L

2. Slips, trips, falls 1. • Do not walk alone in ravines, slopes, or other areas where you cannot be seen. • Establish a reference point that can be easily seen from anywhere on the site.

L

3. Injury due to slope instability or failures 1. • Be aware of local plant and animal species that may be a hazard (e.g. poisonous plans, insects, snakes).

L

4. Loss of bearing (orientation) 1. • Be aware of utilities, fences, curbs, and other hazards in reconnaissance area L

5. Traffic 1. Be aware of traffic

2. Bring a spotter if needed.

L
Equipment to be Used Training Requirements/Competent or Qualified Personnel Name(s)
Inspection
Requirements
First aid kit Current First Aid certification is required for all employees but use of first aid kit is permitted for anyone.

Check to make sure kit is complete prior to use at site. Replace used or outdated items.

Vehicles Valid driver's license Routine inspection by so that vehicles meet the requirements for safe operation on roads. Seat belts shall be in good working order with no visible damage or alterations.

Personal Protective
Equipment
Basic familiarity and hands-on experience PPE shall be in good working order with no visible damage or alterations.

PID Basic familiarity and hands-on experience PID shall be in good working order with no visible damage or alterations.

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 26
XIV. Appendix D – Pavement Management Data Files
The Pavement Management data files shall be submitted to OCTA in spreadsheet format. This must include the following information:
• Street name and limits for all public streets
• Street identifiers (Branch ID, Section ID)
• Direction (if applicable)
• Beginning and ending of each section
• Length, widths, and true areas
• Functional Classification (MPAH, Local)
• Number of travel lanes
• PCI and date of inspection
• Type of recommended treatment
• Cost of recommended treatment
The Pavement Management data files are included as Appendix D

BranchID SectionID Street Name From To Length Width Section True Area
Functional
Classification
Number
of Lanes
PCI Type of Treatment Unit Cost Cost of
Treatment
BALLROAD 1 Ball Road Bloomfield St W/S W City Limits 1,289 80 103,120 MPAH 5 72.9 Slurry Seal $0.35 $36,092 BLOOMST 3 Bloomfield St Cerritos Ave S/S Katella Ave N/S 2,613 60 156,780 MPAH 5 74.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $54,873 BLOOMST 4 Bloomfield St N City Limit Cerritos Ave N/S 3,371 65 219,115 MPAH 5 83.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $76,690 BRADBRD 5 Bradbury Rd Los Alamitos Blvd Pine St 965 48 46,320 Local 2 62.8 Thin Overlay $2.96 $137,107 CERRIAVE 6 Cerritos Ave W City Limit Los Alamitos Blvd E/S 1,575 74 116,550 MPAH 5 73.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $40,793 CERRIAVE 8 Cerritos Ave Bloomfield St E/S Santa Clara St W/S 1,527 80 122,160 MPAH 5 71.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $42,756 CERRIAVE 9 Cerritos Ave Los Alamitos Blvd E/S Bloomfield St E/S 2,608 80 208,640 MPAH 5 56.2 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $980,608 FARQUAVE 10 Farquhar Ave Lexington Dr W/S Bloomfield St E/S 2,651 35 92,785 Local 2 57.9 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $436,090 FARQUAVE 11 Farquhar Ave Bloomfield St E/S Los Alamitos Blvd E/S 2,600 35 91,000 Local 2 76.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $31,850 FLORIST 12 Florista St Oak St Los Alamitos Blvd 1,161 52 60,372 Local 3 74.3 Slurry Seal $0.35 $21,130 KATEAVEEB 13 Katella Ave EB Lexington Dr E/S Siboney St 3,291 37 121,767 MPAH 4 68.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $360,430 KATEAVEEB 14 Katella Ave EB I-605 Off Ramp Los Alamitos Blvd W/S 2,891 45 130,095 MPAH 4 78.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $45,533 KATEAVEEB 16 Katella Ave EB Los Alamitos Blvd E/S Bloomfield St E/S 2,643 41 108,363 MPAH 4 75.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $37,927 KATEAVEWB 17 Katella Ave WB Bloomfield St E/S Los Alamitos Blvd E/S 2,608 40 104,320 MPAH 4 66.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $308,787 KATEAVEEB 18 Katella Ave EB Bloomfield St E/S Lexington Dr E/S 2,654 42 111,468 MPAH 4 76.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $39,014 KATEAVEWB 19 Katella Ave WB Siboney St E/S Lexington Dr E/S 3,290 33 108,570 MPAH 4 46.3 Reconstruct $17.63 $1,914,089 KATEAVEEB 21 Katella Ave EB Siboney St Walker St 1,984 43 85,312 MPAH 4 81.2 Slurry Seal $0.35 $29,859 KATEAVEWB 22 Katella Ave WB Siboney St Walker St 1,985 43 85,355 MPAH 4 77.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $29,874 KATEAVEWB 24 Katella Ave WB Lexington Dr E/S Bloomfield St E/S 2,653 42 111,426 MPAH 4 59.2 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $523,702 LEXINDR 25 Lexington Dr Katella Ave S/S Farquhar Ave 1,312 60 78,720 MPAH 2 84.2 Slurry Seal $0.35 $27,552 LOALBLNB 27 Los Alamitos Blvd N/B Katella Ave S/S Farquhar Ave N/S 1,284 47 60,348 MPAH 2 61.1 Thin Overlay $2.96 $178,630 LOALBLNB 28 Los Alamitos Blvd N/B Farquhar Ave N/S Katella Ave S/S 1,283 47 60,301 MPAH 2 85.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $21,105 LOALBLSB 29 Los Alamitos Blvd S/B Farquhar Ave N/S Rossmoor Way N/S 2,539 45 114,255 MPAH 2 71.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $39,989 LOALBLNB 30 Los Alamitos Blvd N/B Rossmoor Way N/S Farquhar Ave N/S 2,562 45 115,290 MPAH 2 76.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $40,352 LOALBLSB 31 Los Alamitos Blvd S/B Rossmoor Way N/S Bradbury Rd N/S 1,843 38 70,034 MPAH 2 79.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $24,512 LOALBLNB 32 Los Alamitos Blvd N/B Cerritos Ave N/S 1300' N/O Cerritos Ave 1,277 45 57,465 MPAH 2 62.6 Thin Overlay $2.96 $170,096 LOALBLNB 35 Los Alamitos Blvd N/B Bradbury Rd N/S Rossmoor Way N/S 1,741 37 64,417 MPAH 2 75.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $22,546 ROSSMWAY 36 Rossmoor Way Los Alamitos Blvd Pine St 1,015 44 44,660 Local 2 62.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $132,194 SIBONST 37 Siboney St Antietam Ave N/S Katella Ave S/S 381 32 12,192 Local 2 89.3 Slurry Seal $0.35 $4,267 WINNECIR 38 Winners Cir Katella Ave S CDS 789 42 33,138 Local 2 57.8 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $155,749 BARBILN 42 Barbi Ln N CDS Denwood Ave 506 32 16,192 Local 2 91.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $5,667 BENNIST 45 Bennington St Antietam Ave Howard Ave 766 32 24,512 Local 2 91.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $8,579 BUNKEDR 52 Bunkerhill Dr Katella Frontage Rd Howard Ave 1,117 32 35,744 Local 2 81.9 Slurry Seal $0.35 $12,510 CATALST 57 Catalina St Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 790 33 26,070 Local 2 65.0 Thin Overlay $2.96 $77,167 CATALST 59 Catalina St Walnut St Chestnut St 391 32 12,512 Local 2 98.3 Slurry Seal $0.35 $4,379 CATALST 60 Catalina St Oak St Walnut St 406 32 12,992 Local 2 98.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $4,547 CATALST 61 Catalina St Reagan St Cherry St 419 33 13,827 Local 2 67.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $40,928 CHERRST 62 Cherry St Farquhar Ave Thor Ave 1,114 33 36,762 Local 2 95.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $12,867 CHERRST 64 Cherry St N CDS Kempton Dr 2,519 32 80,608 Local 2 72.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $28,213 CHESTST 65 Chestnut St Catalina St Florista St 621 42 26,082 Local 2 35.2 Reconstruct $17.63 $459,826 CHESTST 66 Chestnut St Cerritos Ave Catalina St 1,346 33 44,418 Local 2 46.3 Reconstruct $17.63 $783,089 DENWOAVE 77 Denwood Ave Rochelle St Kelly Ln 1,049 32 33,568 Local 2 99.3 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,749 ELDORWAY 79 El Dorado Way N CDS San Joaquin Ave 378 30 11,340 Local 2 95.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $3,969 ENTERDR 80 Enterprise Dr Green Ave Howard Ave 910 35 31,850 Local 2 76.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,148 ENTERDR 81 Enterprise Dr Katella Ave Green Ave 293 35 10,255 Local 2 88.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $3,589 ESSEXDR 82 Essex Dr Green Ave Howard Ave 910 35 31,850 Local 2 73.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,148 FARNHAVE 83 Farnham Ave N City Limit Kinmount St 263 30 7,890 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,762 FLORIST 90 Florista St Pine St Alley 201 52 10,452 Local 3 95.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $3,658 FLORIST 91 Florista St Reagan St Cherry St 393 52 20,436 Local 3 94.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $7,153 GLACICIR 97 Glacier Cir Olympic Dr S END 375 22 8,250 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,888 GREENAVE 98 Green Ave Bloomfield St Noel St 1,322 33 43,626 Local 2 62.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $129,133 GREENAVE 99 Green Ave Saratoga Dr Midway Dr 1,185 35 41,475 Local 2 79.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $14,516 GREENAVE 100 Green Ave Reagan St Maple St 1,191 33 39,303 Local 2 67.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $116,337 GREENAVE 101 Green Ave Noel St Lexington Dr 1,333 33 43,989 Local 2 48.3 Reconstruct $17.63 $775,526 GREENAVE 102 Green Ave Maple St Bloomfield St 666 33 21,978 Local 2 58.3 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $103,297 GREENAVE 103 Green Ave Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 761 33 25,113 Local 2 69.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $74,334 GREENAVE 104 Green Ave Midway Dr Ticonderoga Dr 291 34 9,894 Local 2 80.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $3,463 HARRIRD 106 Harrisburg Rd Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 868 33 28,644 Local 2 89.8 Slurry Seal $0.35 $10,025 HOLDECIR 108 Holden Cir Fenley Dr NE CDS 582 30 17,460 Local 2 96.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $6,111 HOWARAVE 110 Howard Ave Maple St Bloomfield St 660 33 21,780 Local 2 59.9 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $102,366 HOWARAVE 111 Howard Ave Lexington Dr Enterprise Dr 1,157 35 40,495 Local 2 62.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $119,865 HOWARAVE 112 Howard Ave Reagan St Maple St 1,192 33 39,336 Local 2 94.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $13,768 HOWARAVE 113 Howard Ave Enterprise Dr Ticonderoga Dr 625 35 21,875 Local 2 77.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $7,656 HOWARAVE 115 Howard Ave Bloomfield St Noel St 1,322 33 43,626 Local 2 65.6 Thin Overlay $2.96 $129,133 HOWARAVE 116 Howard Ave Bennington St E END 1,246 32 39,872 Local 2 97.8 Slurry Seal $0.35 $13,955 HOWARAVE 117 Howard Ave Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 764 33 25,212 Local 2 64.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $74,628 HUMBOST 118 Humbolt St Myra Ave San Joaquin Way 1,277 37 47,249 Local 2 88.8 Slurry Seal $0.35 $16,537 HUMBOST 120 Humbolt St San Joaquin Way Cerritos Ave 218 37 8,066 Local 2 89.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,823 KAYLOAVE 125 Kaylor Ave Ball Rd Toland Cir 159 30 4,770 Local 2 96.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $1,670 KEARSAVE 128 Kearsarge Ave Bennington St Mindora St 1,059 32 33,888 Local 2 96.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,861

BranchID SectionID Street Name From To Length Width Section True Area
Functional
Classification
Number
of Lanes
PCI Type of Treatment Unit Cost Cost of
Treatment
KELLYLN 129 Kelly Ln N CDS Denwood Ave 486 32 15,552 Local 2 96.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $5,443 KEMPTDR 130 Kempton Dr Paseo Bonita Cherry St 987 32 31,584 Local 2 74.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,054 KINGSST 131 Kings St Myra Ave San Mateo Ave 1,112 37 41,144 Local 2 92.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $14,400 KYLEST 135 Kyle St Kinmount St S CDS 248 32 7,936 Local 2 89.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,778 LACOLWAY 136 La Colmena Way Pine St E CDS 679 32 21,728 Local 2 74.9 Slurry Seal $0.35 $7,605 LANGLDR 138 Langley Dr Green Ave Howard Ave 947 35 33,145 Local 2 69.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $98,109 LASSEST 140 Lassen St N CDS San Joaquin Way 220 33 7,260 Local 2 88.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,541 LINDAWAY 149 Linda Way N CDS Denwood Ave 508 32 16,256 Local 2 94.3 Slurry Seal $0.35 $5,690 MAPLEST 153 Maple St Farquhar Ave Denwood Ave 598 32 19,136 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $6,698 MAPLEST 154 Maple St Kinmount St S CDS 250 32 8,000 Local 2 92.8 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,800 MARIOAVE 156 Marion Ave Kings St E CDS 365 33 12,045 Local 2 90.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $4,216 MIDWADR 158 Midway Dr Green Ave Howard Ave 910 35 31,850 Local 2 79.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,148 MIDWADR 159 Midway Dr Katella Ave Green Ave 291 35 10,185 Local 2 85.3 Slurry Seal $0.35 $3,565 MINDOST 160 Mindora St Antietam Ave Howard Ave 731 32 23,392 Local 2 96.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $8,187 MYRAAVE 167 Myra Ave Humbolt St E CDS 703 33 23,199 Local 2 90.2 Slurry Seal $0.35 $8,120 NOELST 168 Noel St Katella Ave Farquhar Ave 1,296 32 41,472 Local 2 79.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $14,515 OAKST 170 Oak St Sausalito St Catalina St 659 46 30,314 Local 2 33.7 Reconstruct $17.63 $534,436 OAKST 171 Oak St Catalina St Katella Ave 1,311 46 60,306 Local 2 49.0 Reconstruct $17.63 $1,063,195 ORANGAVE 175 Orangewood Ave Los Alamitos Blvd E END 1,294 32 41,408 MPAH 2 76.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $14,493 PASEOBONIT 177 Paseo Bonita Bradbury Rd Kempton Dr 775 32 24,800 Local 2 64.0 Thin Overlay $2.96 $73,408 PASEOBONIT 178 Paseo Bonita N CDS Rossmoor Way 462 32 14,784 Local 2 66.0 Thin Overlay $2.96 $43,761 PASEOBONIT 179 Paseo Bonita Rossmoor Way Bradbury Rd 1,747 32 55,904 Local 2 72.9 Slurry Seal $0.35 $19,566 PINEST 180 Pine St La Colmena Way Rossmoor Way 1,056 32 33,792 Local 2 72.9 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,827 PINEST 181 Pine St Rossmoor Way Kempton 2,272 32 72,704 Local 2 63.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $215,204 PINEST 182 Pine St Farquhar Ave Harrisburg Ave 864 33 28,512 Local 2 56.0 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $134,006 PINEST 183 Pine St Catalina St Florista St 490 53 25,970 Local 2 88.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $9,090 RANGEDR 187 Ranger Dr Katella Frontage Rd Howard Ave 1,105 32 35,360 Local 2 70.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $12,376 REAGAST 188 Reagan St Catalina St Katela Ave 1,128 53 59,784 Local 2 78.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $20,924 REAGAST 190 Reagan St La Colmena Way Rossmoor Way 1,033 32 33,056 Local 2 69.6 Thin Overlay $2.96 $97,846 REAGAST 191 Reagan St Bradbury Rd Kempton Dr 1,114 32 35,648 Local 2 66.7 Thin Overlay $2.96 $105,518 REAGAST 192 Reagan St Farquhar Ave Harrisburg Ave 834 33 27,522 Local 2 92.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $9,633 REAGAST 193 Reagan St Katella Ave Farquhar Ave 1,298 32 41,536 Local 2 54.0 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $195,219 REAGAST 194 Reagan St Rossmoor Way Bradbury Rd 1,150 32 36,800 Local 2 72.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $12,880 ROCHEST 195 Rochelle St Farquhar Ave Denwood Ave 589 32 18,848 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $6,597 ROSSMWAY 198 Rossmoor Way Pine St Cherry St 625 32 20,000 Local 2 74.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $7,000 SANBONAVE 199 San Bonito Ave Kings St Bloomfield St 638 37 23,606 Local 2 91.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $8,262 SANJAOST 200 San Jaoquin St El Dorado Way Del Norte Way 245 30 7,350 Local 2 96.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,573 SANJAOST 201 San Jaoquin St Humbolt St E CDS 273 33 9,009 Local 2 87.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $3,153 SANJAOST 202 San Jaoquin St Lassen St Humbolt St 186 33 6,138 Local 2 92.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,148 SANMATAVE 203 San Mateo Ave Humbolt St E CDS 610 33 20,130 Local 2 91.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $7,046 SARATDR 211 Saratoga Dr Katella Ave Howard Ave 1,237 35 43,295 Local 2 75.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $15,153 SAUSAST 213 Sausalito St Oak St Walnut St 425 33 14,025 Local 2 38.6 Reconstruct $17.63 $247,261 SAUSAST 215 Sausalito St Walnut St Chestnut St 395 33 13,035 Local 2 44.4 Reconstruct $17.63 $229,807 SAUSAST 216 Sausalito St Chestnut St Los Alamitos Blvd 308 33 10,164 Local 2 59.3 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $47,771 SHASTAVE 218 Shasta Ave Kings St E CDS 457 33 15,081 Local 2 89.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $5,278 SIERRCIR 223 Sierra Cir N CDS Cerritos Ave 293 33 9,669 Local 2 66.2 Thin Overlay $2.96 $28,620 SNARKST 224 Snark St Harrisburg Rd Thor Ave 231 33 7,623 Local 2 97.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,668 SNARKST 225 Snark St N END Harrisburg Ave 129 33 4,257 Local 2 58.2 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $20,008 TARAWDR 226 Tarawa Dr Katella Frontage Rd Howard Ave 1,120 32 35,840 Local 2 80.2 Slurry Seal $0.35 $12,544 THORAVE 227 Thor Ave Snark St Cherry St 953 33 31,449 Local 2 98.8 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,007 TICONDR 228 Ticonderoga Dr Katella Ave Howard Ave 1,262 32 40,384 Local 2 70.8 Slurry Seal $0.35 $14,134 TOLANCIR 230 Toland Cir Kaylor Ave E CDS 581 30 17,430 Local 2 96.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $6,101 TRIPOAVE 231 Tripoli Ave Bennington St Mindora St 1,064 32 34,048 Local 2 97.8 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,917 VISTDEORA 236 Vista De Ora Reagan St E CDS 411 32 13,152 Local 2 78.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $4,603 WALNUST 237 Walnut St Sausalito St Catalina St 656 33 21,648 Local 2 48.8 Reconstruct $17.63 $381,654 WALNUST 238 Walnut St Catalina St Florista St 615 43 26,445 Local 2 50.8 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $124,292 WALNUST 239 Walnut St Florista St Katella Ave N/S 586 56 32,816 Local 2 78.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,486 KATEFRORD 259 Katella Frontage Rd Ticonderoga Dr E END 897 30 26,910 Local 2 92.2 Slurry Seal $0.35 $9,419 ENTERDR 260 Enterprise Dr Howard Ave S END 153 35 5,355 Local 2 71.9 Slurry Seal $0.35 $1,874 BRADBRD 263 Bradbury Rd Pine St Cherry St 627 32 20,064 Local 2 69.4 Thin Overlay $2.96 $59,389 FLORIST 265 Florista St Kyle St Bloomfield St 507 36 18,252 Local 2 36.2 Reconstruct $17.63 $321,783 KAYLOAVE 266 Kaylor Ave Katella Ave Catalina St 903 36 32,508 Local 2 35.7 Reconstruct $17.63 $573,116 KYLEST 267 Kyle St Catalina St Florista St 390 36 14,040 Local 2 53.8 Grind and Overlay $4.70 $65,988 REAGAST 268 Reagan St Briggeman Dr Catalina St 843 36 30,348 Local 2 70.2 Slurry Seal $0.35 $10,622 BRIGGDR 269 Briggeman Dr Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 764 32 24,448 Local 2 39.6 Reconstruct $17.63 $431,018 BRIGGDR 270 Briggeman Dr Reagan St E END 326 26 8,476 Local 2 44.6 Reconstruct $17.63 $149,432 SERPEDR 271 Serpentine Dr Los Alamitos Blvd Reagan St 801 32 25,632 Local 2 69.9 Thin Overlay $2.96 $75,871 CALLELEE 272 Calle Lee Cerritos Ave SW CDS 917 36 33,012 MPAH 2 45.9 Reconstruct $17.63 $582,002 CORPOCENTE 273 Corporate Center Calle Lee Lexington Dr 852 36 30,672 MPAH 2 39.7 Reconstruct $17.63 $540,747 HUMBOST 274 Humbolt St Cerritos Ave SE CDS 1,226 40 49,040 Local 2 62.1 Thin Overlay $2.96 $145,158

BranchID SectionID Street Name From To Length Width Section True Area
Functional
Classification
Number
of Lanes
PCI Type of Treatment Unit Cost Cost of
Treatment
LEXINDR 275 Lexington Dr Cerritos Ave 560' s/o Corporate Center Dr 2,606 26 67,756 MPAH 2 75.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $23,715 LOSVAQUE 276 Los Vaqueros Cerritos Ave SW CDS 948 36 34,128 Local 2 72.2 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,945 NOELST 277 Noel St NE CDS Katella Ave 836 42 35,112 Local 2 98.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $12,289 PORTADR 278 Portal Dr NW CDS Katella Ave 884 40 35,360 Local 2 30.8 Reconstruct $17.63 $623,397 VIAELMER 279 Via El Mercado Katella Ave S CDS 334 46 15,364 Local 2 81.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $5,377 HOWARAVE 280 Howard Ave Ticonderoga Dr Bennington St 1,100 32 35,200 Local 2 86.3 Slurry Seal $0.35 $12,320 PINEST 281 Pine St Florista St 175' s/o Florista St 175 32 5,600 Local 2 67.5 Thin Overlay $2.96 $16,576 PINEST 282 Pine St 175' s/o Florista St Katella Ave 461 45 20,745 Local 2 71.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $7,261 FLORIST 283 Florista St Alley Reagon St 199 52 10,348 Local 3 92.9 Slurry Seal $0.35 $3,622 FLORIST 284 Florista St Los Alamitos Blvd Pine St 357 52 18,564 Local 3 93.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $6,497 KATEAVEWB 286 Katella Ave WB Los Alamitos Blvd I-605 On Ramp 2,818 44 123,992 MPAH 4 79.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $43,397 CHESTST 287 Chestnut St Florista St 320' s/o Florista St 475 42 19,950 Local 2 85.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $6,983 CHESTST 288 Chestnut St 320' s/o Florista St Katella Ave 274 52 14,248 Local 2 86.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $4,987 CERRIAVE 289 Cerritos Ave Bloomfield St E/S Lexington Dr 1,111 80 88,880 MPAH 5 89.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $31,108 LOALBLSB 290 Los Alamitos Blvd S/B 1300' N/O Cerritos Ave Cerritos Ave 1,263 45 56,835 MPAH 2 90.2 Slurry Seal $0.35 $19,892 LOALBLNB 291 Los Alamitos Blvd N/B Katella Ave Cerritos Ave 2,624 47 123,328 MPAH 2 85.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $43,165 LOALBLSB 292 Los Alamitos Blvd S/B Cerritos Ave Katella Ave 2,629 47 123,563 MPAH 2 84.5 Slurry Seal $0.35 $43,247 HOWARAVE 1141 Howard Ave Noel St Lexington Dr 876 30 26,280 Local 2 86.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $9,198 INTERCIR 1221 Interior Cir Lampson Frontage Rd N END 382 22 8,404 Local 2 97.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,941 KAYLOAVE 1241 Kaylor Ave Ball Rd North City Limit 155 30 4,650 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $1,628 KAYLOAVE 1261 Kaylor Ave Toland Cir Fenley Dr 542 30 16,260 Local 2 96.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $5,691 KINMOST 1321 Kinmount St Maple St Farnham Ave 511 30 15,330 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $5,366 LUNARDR 1511 Lunar Dr Olympic Dr Lampson Frontage Rd 600 28 16,800 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $5,880 MAPLEST 1521 Maple St Katella Ave Farquhar Ave 1,250 32 40,000 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $14,000 OLYMPDR 1721 Olympic Dr Lunar Dr Satellite Dr 840 28 23,520 Local 2 98.3 Slurry Seal $0.35 $8,232 RAINICIR 1861 Rainier Cir Lampson Frontage Rd N END 385 22 8,470 Local 2 99.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,965 BLOOMST 2001 Bloomfield St Katella Ave Farquhar Ave 1,250 32 40,000 MPAH 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $14,000 SATELDR 2121 Satellite Dr Olympic Dr Lampson Frontage Rd 610 28 17,080 Local 2 99.4 Slurry Seal $0.35 $5,978 TOLANAVE 2291 Toland Ave Fenley Dr Kaylor Ave 1,205 30 36,150 Local 2 96.7 Slurry Seal $0.35 $12,653 VICKSCIR 2351 Vicksburg Cir Olympic Dr S END 308 22 6,776 Local 2 96.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,372 LAMPFRORD 2611 Lampson Frontage Rd Lunar Dr Satellite Dr 851 28 23,828 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $8,340 CATALST 2641 Catalina St Cherry St Kyle St 978 36 35,208 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $12,323 ANTIEAVE 4001 Antietam Ave Bennington St Mindora St 1,044 32 33,408 Local 2 94.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,693 APOLLCIR 4101 Apollo Cir Lunar Dr E END 28 22 616 Local 2 100.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $216 CARLSCIR 5401 Carlsbad Cir W END Satellite Dr 352 22 7,744 Local 2 98.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,710 CATALST 5601 Catalina St Chestnut St Los Alamitos Blvd 201 32 6,432 Local 2 98.6 Slurry Seal $0.35 $2,251 CHERRST 6301 Cherry St Catalina St Katella Ave 1,082 52 56,261 Local 2 93.0 Slurry Seal $0.35 $19,691 DELNORWAY 7501 Del Norte Way Cerritos Ave N CDS 386 30 11,580 Local 2 94.9 Slurry Seal $0.35 $4,053 FENLEDR 8401 Fenley Dr W CDS Kaylor Ave 1,083 30 32,490 Local 2 98.1 Slurry Seal $0.35 $11,372

Pavement Management Plan Agency Submittal
P a g e | 27
XV. Appendix E – GIS Maps – Current Conditions

Carlsbad Cir
Glacier Cir
Enterprise Dr
Humbolt St
Snark St
Sierra Cir
Farnham Ave
C
h
e
stnut St
Briggeman DrEl Dorado Way
Lassen St
Sausalito St
Siboney St
Kyle St
Vista De Ora
Marion Ave
Shasta Ave
Bradbury Rd
Kelly Ln
Barbi Ln
Linda Way
Lunar Dr
San Bonito Ave
Holden Cir
Toland Cir
Rochelle St
Rossmoor Way
Walnut St
Howard Ave
Green Ave
La Colmena Way
Myra Ave
Mindora St
Bennington St
Winners Cir
Serpentine Dr
Olympic Dr
Corporate Center
Harrisburg Rd
Portal D
r
Essex Dr
Midway Dr
Katella Frontage Rd
Kaylor Ave
L
a
n
gle
y
D
r
Calle Lee Los Vaqueros
Thor Ave
Catalina St
Kempton Dr Reagan St
Fenley Dr
Maple St
Ranger Dr
Tarawa Dr
Bunkerhill Dr
Florista St
Saratoga Dr
Tic
o
n
d
e
r
o
g
a
D
r
TolandAve
Bloomfield St
Los Alamitos Blvd N/B
Ball Road
Orangewood Ave
Noel St
Oak St
Paseo Bonita
Los Alamitos Blvd S/B
Katella Ave WB
Pine St
Cherry St
L
e
xin
gto
n
D
r
Cerritos Ave
Farquhar Ave
Katella Ave EB
City of Los Alamitos, CA
Pavement Condition 2025
0 0.25 0.5 Miles
Pavement Condition Index
0 - 40 Very Poor
41 - 59 Poor
60 - 74 Fair
75 - 85 Good
86 - 100 Very Good

City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 20, 2026 ITEM NUMBER: 11G
To: Mayor Tanya Doby & Members of the City Council
Presented By: Ron Noda, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Farhard Iranitalab, Traffic Engineer
Subject: Citywide Speed Survey Report

SUMMARY
The California Vehicle Code (CVC) requires that Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) be conducted to establish or revise prima facie speed limits on roadways where radar or other electronic speed enforcement methods are to be utilized. These surveys analyze prevailing vehicle speeds, roadway conditions, collision history, and surrounding land uses to ensure that posted speed limits are reasonable, safe, and legally enforceable. To maintain compliance with State of California requirements and preserve the City’s ability to effectively enforce speed limits, these surveys must be updated at regular intervals, typically every five (5) to seven (7) years, or sooner if significant roadway or traffic pattern changes occur.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Review the speed survey report; and,

2. Based on the speed survey performed, the staff recommends maintaining the posted speed limits on City streets, except within the following street segment:
• The study recommends reducing the posted speed on Los Alamitos Boulevard, between Katella Avenue and Bradbury Road, from 40 miles per hour (mph) to 35 miles per hour.

BACKGROUND
The establishment and enforcement of speed limits on public roadways within Los Alamitos are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), which requires that speed limits be based on current Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E&TS) for certain street classifications. These surveys evaluate prevailing vehicle speeds, roadway characteristics, traffic volumes, collision history, and adjacent land uses to determine appropriate and enforceable speed limits. State law requires that E&TS be updated periodically, typically every five (5) to seven (7) years, to remain valid for radar and other electronic speed enforcement. If a survey is not updated within the required timeframe, law enforcement agencies may be restricted from using radar-based enforcement on affected roadways, limiting their ability to effectively address speeding concerns.

Maintaining current E&TS documentation supports public safety objectives by aligning posted speed limits with actual driving behavior while also strengthening the legal defensibility of citations issued by law enforcement. Without valid, up-to-date surveys, the City may face limitations on enforcing speed limits, potentially reducing the effectiveness of speed control efforts. Accordingly, periodic updates to these surveys are a critical component of the City’s ongoing traffic safety and roadway management program. The City last completed a comprehensive update of its Engineering and Traffic Surveys in 2021, and several of these surveys are approaching or have exceeded the allowable validity period. To maintain compliance with State requirements and support ongoing traffic safety efforts, it is necessary to update the existing surveys. This effort ensures that posted speed limits remain reflective of current roadway conditions and remain enforceable under State law.

DISCUSSION
Willdan Engineering completed the Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) to justify and/or update the posted speed limits along 12 street segments in the City of Los Alamitos. These segments were last surveyed in 2021 and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

Table 1 presents the summary of speed recommendations. As shown on Table 1, the study recommends no changes to 11 of the 12 existing segments. The study recommends reducing the posted speed limit of Los Alamitos Boulevard, between Katella Avenue and Bradbury Road, from 40 mph to 35 mph. The reason for this reduction is based on the crash rate on this segment of Los Alamitos Boulevard as shown in the table below.

Table 2 of the attached report, and as shown below, identifies all street segments with recommended posted speed limits.

FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact is approximately $1,000 to replace the existing signage to reflect the revised speed limit on Los Alamitos Boulevard, between Katella Avenue and Bradbury Road. This will come out of the Development Services Department street maintenance budget.

Attachment: 1. Los Alamitos 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

City of Los Alamitos
2026 Engineering and
Traffic Survey Report
March 2026
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 1

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
March 31, 2026
Ron Noda
Assistant City Manager
3191 Katella Avenue
Los Alamitos, CA 90720
Subject: Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) - 2026
Dear Mr. Noda:

As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) to justify and update the posted speed limits along 12 street segments in the City of Los Alamitos. These segments were last surveyed in 2021 and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&TS procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices.

The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) dated January 2026, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.

We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of Los Alamitos and the assistance, cooperation, and guidance afforded to us during the course of this study.

Very truly yours,

WILLDAN
Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E.

Traffic Engineer
Enclosure

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 2

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Table of Contents
Introduction........................................................................................................3 Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey.......................................................................................5 Speed Sampling......................................................................................................................................5 Crash History..........................................................................................................................................6 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists......................................................................................6 Safety Corridors – New from AB 43 .......................................................................................................6 A Land or Facility that Generates High Concentrations of Pedestrians or Bicyclists - New from AB 43 7 Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit – New from AB 43......................8 Residence Districts & Local Roads .........................................................................................................9 Survey Conditions.............................................................................................10 Survey Locations......................................................................................................................................10 Data Collection ........................................................................................................................................10 Speed Data...........................................................................................................................................10 Field Review Data ................................................................................................................................11 Crash Data ...........................................................................................................................................12 Residential Density and Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12p)...................12 Analysis ............................................................................................................13 Speed Limit Recommendations.........................................................................14 Recommendation Tables.........................................................................................................................14 Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits.............................................................................15 Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes..........................................................17 Table 3 – Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit.........................................................18 Segments with Special Conditions.....................................................................19 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists.......................................................................................19 Appendices

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms

APPENDIX C
ADT Count Sheets

APPENDIX D
Survey Equipment

APPENDIX E
Legislative References

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 3

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Introduction
This E&TS is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Los Alamitos. This E&TS presents recommended speed limits for 12 street segments in the City of Los Alamitos. E&T Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local, major, secondary, collector, and arterial streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. Historically, these surveys must be updated every 7 to 14 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions, and can be enforced per CVC Section 40802.

E&T Surveys are prepared under the direction of CVC Sections 627,22350-22359, and 40801-40803. The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD) dated January 2026.

Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43), signed in October 2021, has given local agencies more leeway in lowering and maintaining speed limits aimed at enhancing traffic safety. The California Vehicle Code was amended in 2022 and the CA MUTCD was amended in March 2023 and updated in January 2026 to implement laws and guidelines with the changes set forth in AB 43. There were three major changes to how speed limits can be recommended under AB 43 as follows:

1. An E&T Survey conducted more than 7 years ago may be extended to 14 years (previously to 10 years) if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)].

2. A local authority may establish and designate safety corridors throughout their jurisdiction. The local authority may recommend a speed limit with an additional five mile per hour reduction on segments designated as safety corridors. Local authorities may not lower a speed limit under this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in January 2026, this report reflects lowering speeds on these designated roadway segments.

3. If a local authority, after completing an E&T Survey, finds that the speed limit is still reasonable or safe, the local authority may retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

This E&TS was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the Police Department(s) have completed a 24- hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)].

Posted speed limits are primarily established to protect the public by mitigating the risks posed by reckless and unpredictable driving behavior. The posted speed limits provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law [CVC Section 22350]. This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 4

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually conducted to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.

The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the CA MUTCD and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey:

1. Measurement of prevailing speed based on the 85th percentile rule

2. Accident history on the roadway

3. Roadway conditions and other relevant factors that are not readily apparent to the motorist.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.

Artificially low speed limits can lead to poor compliance as well as large variations in speed within the traffic stream. Increased speed variance can also create more conflicts and passing maneuvers.

To achieve desired operating speeds, agencies often implement other speed management strategies concurrently with setting speed limits, such as traffic calming measures, geometric design features, speed safety cameras, and increased enforcement.

The most effective way to reduce speeds is through a combination of strategies using traffic control devices related to speed management, roadway design and engineering solutions, traffic calming techniques and measures, public education, and enforcement efforts. Effectively managing road user speed relies on numerous factors, which include enforcement, roadway characteristics, surrounding environment, adjacent land use, and traffic control devices. Many studies find that engineering changes, such as change a road’s infrastructure, are one of the most important factors in reducing vehicle

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 5

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
operating speeds. Engineering changes are also one of the most effective interventions at reducing pedestrian injury and fatality rates. Potential street engineering changes, such as curb extensions, median islands, raised crosswalks, roundabouts, and speed bumps or speed humps, naturally result in lower speeds. It is realized that these engineering changes can be costly and time-consuming to implement.

Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey
The CA MUTCD specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&TS are discussed in more detail as follows:

Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. A speed limit is established in the options below.

Options:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed – A speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12z) ▪ Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require rounding down, the speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12aa) ▪ Rounding Down - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ab) ▪ Additional 5 mph Speed Reduction – Additional lowering of the speed limits from those calculated using rounding down or using the reduction using special conditions is prohibited, except for the local agency roadway segments designated as “safety corridor” or “land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians” in compliance with CVC Sections 22358.6(d) and 22358.7. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ag) If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&T Survey shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ac)
The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85th-percentile speed. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ae)

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 6

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Examples Showing the Applicability of Rounding and Additional Speed Reduction 85th
Percentile
Speed
(mph)
Rounding to the
nearest 5 mph
increment
If rounding to the
nearest is up, may
round down
If rounding to the
nearest is down, it
may be additional
be lowered by 5
mph
If safety corridor or
adjacent to high
concentration of
bicyclists &
pedestrians, may
additional lower by
5 mph
48-50 50 45 N/A 40
45-47 45 N/A 40 35
43-45 45 40 N/A 35
40-42 40 N/A 35 30
Crash History
Reported crashes reviewed from California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than expected average rate of crashes. A segment that has an above-average crash rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph below the basic speed limit.

The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning.

Conditions not readily apparent to motorists include the considerations of crash history, poor visibility, and the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians.

Safety Corridors – New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7, a new section added through AB 43, to additionally lower the speed limit by designating a safety corridor, shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in 2026 on these designated roadway segments, this report reflects lowering speeds using the application of safety corridors.

A safety corridor is defined as a roadway segment within an overall roadway network where the highest number of serious injury and fatality crashes occur. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ai)

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 7

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent E&T Survey performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12al) The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall include the following three requirements. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12am):

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.

Safety corridors shall represent a prioritized subset of the overall roadway network within an authority’s responsibilities and shall not exceed one-fifth of the overall roadway network. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12an)
A jurisdiction should use three to five years of the most recent crash data to determine a safety corridor based on Fatal and Serious Injury data. For crash coverage, safety corridors may identify the subset of the overall roadway network where a minimum of 25% of the Fatal + Serious Injury (F+SI) crashes occur. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ao-ap)
A licensed professional engineer shall sign off on logical termini identified for a safety corridor using existing E&TS. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ar)
The Crash/Volume rate may be used to provide additional locations to be included in the safety corridor.

Local agencies may use proactive measures as indicators. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12as) The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, plus an additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation, shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85-percentile speed. Refer to (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ae) A Land or Facility that Generates High Concentrations of Pedestrians or Bicyclists - New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additional lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.

Since the E&TS was completed in 2026 on these designated roadway segments, this report reflects lowering speeds using the application of land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians.

A land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians is a portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed below are present within a distance of 1320 feet longitudinally and has supporting crash data that demonstrates the highway segment is within the top 20% of pedestrian and/or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three to five year period within the jurisdiction. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12at).

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 8

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Table 2B-105(CA) - Requirements to determine Land or Facility that Generates High Concentrations of Bicyclists or Pedestrians
Category Generator
Land Use Employment centers
Presence of retail
Parks, multi-use trails, and recreational destinations
Schools/universities
Senior Centers
Cultural areas, entertainment space areas, or areas of community significance
Religious facilities
Health/medical facilities
Transit Factors Transit stops
Transit Oriented Developments / Transit Priority Areas
Presence of
Pedestrian/Bicyclist
Infrastructure
Sidewalk presence
Crosswalk presence
Bikeway presence
Nearby signalized intersections on four-way intersections Presence of micromobility devices such as bicycles or scooters Demographic Factors Presence of vulnerable groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused
MPO/RTPA or locally defined disadvantaged community status Presence of students (all levels)
Local Data Need identified in a safety analysis such as a road safety audit or formalized planning document such as a local road safety plan If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).

The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, plus an additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation, shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85-percentile speed. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12ae) Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit – New from AB 43 The City may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8, added through AB 43.

The currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&T Survey, the City finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 9

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
If the City decides to use a lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&T Survey and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit or not below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).

Residence Districts & Local Roads
The lawful use of a posted speed limit involves two separate steps:

1. Establishing the Speed Limit Lawfully –Under CVC Sections 22357 and 22358, a posted speed limit must generally be supported by a valid E&T Survey. However, certain situations are exempt from this requirement including:
▪ Residence districts (§ 22352)
▪ Narrow residential Streets (§ 22358.3)
▪ School zones (§ 22358.4)
▪ Senior zones (§ 22352(b)(2))
▪ Business activity districts (§ 22358.9)

2. Enforcing the Speed Limit Lawfully – Even if a speed limit is properly established, it must also be enforceable under the CVC’s prohibition on speed traps (§ 40802). Radar may be used only when supported by an E&TS, except in the following locations:
▪ Local streets or roads (§ 40802(b)(1))
▪ School zones (§ 40802(b)(2))
▪ Senior zones (§ 40802(b)(3))
▪ Business activity districts (§ 40802(b)(4))
Within residence districts, a 25-mph prima facie speed limit is designated by CVC Section 22352(b)(1), unless a different speed is determined by ordinance using an E&TS. A residence district is defined in CVC Section 515 as a segment with a residential density greater than either of the following ratios:
▪ On one side of the highway, within a quarter mile, 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures; or
▪ On both sides combined, within a quarter mile, 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

A residence district may extend longer than a quarter mile if the above density ratio continues.

Local streets or roads, as defined in CVC Section 40802(b)(1), are either functionally classified as “local” on the California Road System Maps or meet all of the following criteria:
▪ Primarily provide access to abutting residential property, ▪ Are no more than 40 feet wide,
▪ Have no more than one-half mile of uninterrupted length, and ▪ Have no more than one traffic lane in each direction.

For a 25-mph prima facie speed limit to be both established and enforceable on a residential street without an E&T Survey, the roadway must qualify as both:

1. A residence district, so that the 25-mph limit is lawfully established without an E&T Survey; and

2. A local street or road, so that the speed limit is enforceable with radar without creating a prohibited speed trap.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 10

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Survey Conditions
The E&T Study considered the roadway context. The factors that are considered when conducting an E&T Survey are the following (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.07):

1. Roadway environment not readily apparent to the driver (CVC § 627) (such as roadside development, number and frequency of driveways and access points, and land use), functional classification, public transit volume and location or frequency of stops, parking practices, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities and activity;

2. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the driver (CVC § 627) (such as lane widths, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, median type, and sight distance);

3. Geographic context (such as residential district, business district, business activity district;

4. Reported crash experience for at least a 36-month period;

5. Speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles including the pace, median (50th-percentile), and 85th- percentile speeds; and

6. A review of past speed studies to identify any trends in operating speeds (CVC § 22358.8) Survey Locations
The procedures below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of Los Alamitos. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following:

1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.

2. Minimum visibility restrictions.

3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.

4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.

Data Collection
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic crashes, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. ADT and field reviews were conducted at 12 locations during the month of February 2026.

Speed Data
Prevailing speeds were determined by a speed zone survey for each roadway segment. The speed zone surveys follow the following guidelines identified in the CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12n:
(A) The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements. (B) Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 11

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
(C) Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.
(D) A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section. If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs. (E) Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic. (F) The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing. (G) The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.
(H) In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.
(I) Short speed zones of less than 0.5 miles should be avoided, except in transition areas. (J) Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.
(K) Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Speed zone surveys were conducted at 12 locations during the month of February 2026. The radar speed distribution forms are in Appendix B.

Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors:

1. Street width and alignment;

2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics;

3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;

4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;

5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;

6. Visibility obstructions;

7. Land use and proximity to schools;

8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;

9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and

10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 12

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Crash Data
Crash data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database. For this study, crash data was used from the latest 3 years of reported accidents from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2025. The crash rates for the 12 segments are expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles (C/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the crash rate:

𝑹 =
𝑪 × 𝟏, 𝟎𝟎𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝒕 × 𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔
𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓
× 𝒍 × 𝒗
C = Number of midblock crashes over time period
R = Crash Rate (crashes/million vehicle miles)
t = Time Period Covered (in years)
l = Length of Segment (miles)
v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment crash rate was then compared to the average statewide crash rate of similar roadways.

The average statewide crash rates were obtained from 2023 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans.

Residential Density and Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12p) When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider residential density and bicyclist and pedestrian safety.

If any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 miles, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 miles the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 miles but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph 1 or 2 above.

Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 13

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Analysis
Survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in the CA MUTCD. Some of the criteria used are:

A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed.

B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed.

C. The crash rate for each street segment is compared to average crash rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average crash rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of Los Alamitos.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of available data and recommend a speed limit for each of the 12 street segments surveyed based on the guidelines for an Engineering and Traffic Survey set forth by the CA MUTCD and the CVC. A complete summary of all 12 E&TS recommendations is shown in Table 1. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a crash rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in the Segments with Special Conditions section of this report.

The California State Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 14

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Speed Limit Recommendations
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.

The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers. (CA MUTCD Section 2B.21.12s) Recommendation Tables
Tables 1-3 summarizing the recommendations are referenced below and included in the following pages. The speed limit recommendations have been organized into the following three tables:

Recommendation Table
Total Number
of Segments
Table 1 - Summary of E&TS Recommended Speed Limits 12
Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Changes to the Posted Speed Limit 1 Table 3 - Recommended Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit 11

Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
1 Ball Road West City Limits Bloomfield Street 0.25 24,544 0.96 0.00 40 42 31-40 65 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed 2 Bloomfield Street North City Limits Cerritos Avenue 0.53 14,284 0.96 0.00 40** 41 31-40 73 % 40** Closest to 85th Speed 3 Bloomfield Street Cerritos Avenue Katella Avenue 0.5 17,498 0.96 0.52 40** 42 32-41 74 % 40** Closest to 85th Speed 4 Bloomfield Street Katella Avenue Farquhar Avenue 0.25 3,930 1.68 1.86 25** 25 15-24 81 % 25** Closest to 85th Speed Cerritos Avenue West City Limits Los Alamitos
Boulevard
5 0.29 29,287 0.94 0.32 40** 41 30-39 66 % 40** Closest to 85th Speed Cerritos Avenue Los Alamitos
Boulevard
6 Bloomfield Street 0.49 28,757 0.96 0.06 40** 44 34-43 71 % 40** Round Down 85th Speed Cerritos Avenue Bloomfield
Street
7 Lexington Drive 0.48 26,751 0.96 0.21 40 45 36-45 73 % 40 Special Condition* 8 Katella Avenue West City Limits Bloomfield Street 1.2 51,821 1.23 0.16 40** 41 33-42 71 % 40** Closest to 85th Speed Katella Avenue Bloomfield
Street
9 Walker Street 1.48 61,571 1.23 0.17 40 42 32-41 71 % 40 Closest to 85th Speed 10 Lexington Drive Katella Avenue Farquhar Avenue 0.77 5,353 1.68 0.44 30 34 25-34 75 % 30 Round Down 85th Speed 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 15
*** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2025 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction

Table 1 - Summary of Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Crash
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
Act. Pace
Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit No. Justification

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Los Alamitos
Boulevard
11 North City Limits Katella Avenue 0.85 24,402 0.94 0.13 35** 40 30-39 74 % 35** Special Condition* Los Alamitos
Boulevard
12 Katella Avenue Bradbury Road 1 45,060 1.23 0.14 35/40** 38 30-39 82 % 35** Round Down 85th Speed 2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 16
*** Crash rate units: Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Crash Rate based on mid-block crashes recorded between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2025 Exp.: Expected Crash Rate based on the Caltrans 2023 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate * See Segments with Special Conditions Section for detailed justification Recommended Speed Limit Reduction

Table 2 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes No. Street From To Existing New Change

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
12 Los Alamitos Boulevard Katella Avenue Bradbury Road 35/40 35 PL Total Segments with Recommended Speed Limit Changes = 1 PL= Post Speed Limit Sign
NP= No Posted Speed Limit
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 17

Table 3 - Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit No. Street From To Existing New

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
1 Ball Road West City Limits Bloomfield Street 40 40
2 Bloomfield Street North City Limits Cerritos Avenue 40 40 3 Bloomfield Street Cerritos Avenue Katella Avenue 40 40 4 Bloomfield Street Katella Avenue Farquhar Avenue 25 25 5 Cerritos Avenue West City Limits Los Alamitos Boulevard 40 40 6 Cerritos Avenue Los Alamitos Boulevard Bloomfield Street 40 40 7 Cerritos Avenue Bloomfield Street Lexington Drive 40 40 8 Katella Avenue West City Limits Bloomfield Street 40 40 9 Katella Avenue Bloomfield Street Walker Street 40 40
10 Lexington Drive Katella Avenue Farquhar Avenue 30 30 11 Los Alamitos Boulevard North City Limits Katella Avenue 35 35 Total Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit = 11
PL= Post Speed Limit Sign
NP= No Posted Speed Limit
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report 18

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
19 Segments with Special Conditions
This section is meant to further explain the use of special conditions to lower the recommended speed limit lower than the 85th Percentile speed. These special conditions include conditions not readily apparent to motorists.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more above or below the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Each segment is discussed below.

Segment 7 – Cerritos Avenue – Bloomfield Street to Lexington Drive This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 26,751 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential, commercial, industrial and a school along the

0.48-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to moderate pedestrian traffic and to maintain uniformity with adjacent segments, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 40 mph for the above reason.

Segment 11 – Los Alamitos Boulevard – North City Limits to Katella Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 24,402 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial and industrial with a school along the 0.85- mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to heavy pedestrian use with an uncontrolled crosswalk midblock along the segment, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain at 35 mph for the above reason.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 1

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Ball Road CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM West City Limits TO Bloomfield Street

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/23/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:31AM 50th Percentile Speed 36 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 31-40 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 24,544
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signals at Kaylor Ave and Bloomfield St Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, commercial
Length of Segment 0.25 miles
Width 83 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Few, both sides
On-Street Parking No
Lighting Both sides
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 4 with painted median
School Zone No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 2

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Bloomfield Street CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM North City Limits TO Cerritos Avenue

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/23/2026 85th Percentile Speed 41 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:15AM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 31-40 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 14,284
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signals at Ball Rd and Cerritos Ave; mid-block pedestrian signal at Laurel High School
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, school, commercial
Length of Segment 0.53 miles
Width 73 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides
On-Street Parking East side only
Lighting Both sides
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 4 with bike lane
School Zone Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.00 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 3

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Bloomfield Street CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM Cerritos Avenue TO Katella Avenue

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/23/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:47AM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 32-41 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 17,498
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signals at Cerritos Ave and Katella Ave Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use School, industrial
Length of Segment 0.50 miles
Width 63 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides
On-Street Parking West side only
Lighting West side of street only
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 4 with two way left turn lane
School Zone Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Heavy Truck Traffic Light

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.52 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 4

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Bloomfield Street CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM Katella Avenue TO Farquhar Avenue

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/23/2026 85th Percentile Speed 25 mph Time of Speed Survey 12:23PM 50th Percentile Speed 21 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 25 mph
10 mph Pace 15-24 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 25 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,930
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signal at Katella Ave; stop control at Green Ave, Howard Ave, and Farquahar Ave
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.25 miles
Width 35 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides
On-Street Parking Both sides with heavy use
Lighting Both sides, few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 2
School Zone Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Light

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 1.86 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 25 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 5

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Cerritos Avenue CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM West City Limits TO Los Alamitos Boulevard

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/24/2026 85th Percentile Speed 41 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:02AM 50th Percentile Speed 36 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 30-39 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 29,287
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signal at Los Alamitos Blvd Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, industrial, school zone
Length of Segment 0.29 miles
Width 70 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides, near TS
On-Street Parking North side only
Lighting Both sides
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 4 with raised median
School Zone Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Moderate

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.32 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 6

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Cerritos Avenue CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM Los Alamitos Boulevard TO Bloomfield Street

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/23/2026 85th Percentile Speed 44 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:45PM 50th Percentile Speed 39 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 34-43 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 28,757
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signal at Los Alamitos Blvd, Griffins Wy, Humbolt St and Bloomfield St
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, commercial, school
Length of Segment 0.49 miles
Width 84 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides, few
On-Street Parking Both side
Lighting Both sides
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 4 with painted median and bike lane
School Zone Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.06 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Justification Round Down 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 7

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Cerritos Avenue CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM Bloomfield Street TO Lexington Drive

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/23/2026 85th Percentile Speed 45 mph Time of Speed Survey 3:13PM 50th Percentile Speed 40 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 36-45 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 26,751
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signal at Bloomfield St and Lexington Dr Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, commercial, industrial, school Length of Segment 0.48 miles
Width 84 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides
On-Street Parking Both sides
Lighting Both sides
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 4 with TWLTL
School Zone No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.21 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Moderate Pedestrian Use & Maintain Uniformity with Adjacent Segments
Justification
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 8

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Katella Avenue CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM West City Limits TO Bloomfield Street

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/24/2026 85th Percentile Speed 41 mph Time of Speed Survey 11:10AM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 33-42 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 51,821
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signals at 1-605 N Ramps, Epson Wy, Walnut St, Los Alamitos Blvd, Cherry St, Kaylor St, and Bloomfield St
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential, commercial, school zone
Length of Segment 1.20 miles
Width 106 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Mostly on north side
On-Street Parking No
Lighting Both sides
Vertical Curve West of 605
Horizontal Curve West of 605
Number of Lanes 6 with raised medians
School Zone Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Light Truck Traffic Moderate

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 11
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.16 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 9

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Katella Avenue CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM Bloomfield Street TO Walker Street

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/24/2026 85th Percentile Speed 42 mph Time of Speed Survey 12:01PM 50th Percentile Speed 37 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 40 mph
10 mph Pace 32-41 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 61,571
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signals at Bloomfield St, Noel St, Lexington Dr, Sibony St, Winners Circl, and Walker St
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Park, commercial, residential, industrial Length of Segment 1.48 miles
Width 100 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides
On-Street Parking Both sides
Lighting Both sides
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 6 with raised medians
School Zone No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Heavy Truck Traffic Moderate

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 17
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.17 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 40 mph
Justification Closest to 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 10

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Lexington Drive CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026
FROM Katella Avenue TO Farquhar Avenue

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/23/2026 85th Percentile Speed 34 mph Time of Speed Survey 1:53PM 50th Percentile Speed 30 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 30 mph
10 mph Pace 25-34 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 30 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,353
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signal at Katella Ave; stop control at Howard Ave and Farquahar Ave
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Length of Segment 0.77 miles
Width 62 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides
On-Street Parking Both sides
Lighting West side of Roadway
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 2
School Zone No
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Light

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.44 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 30 mph
Justification Round Down 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 11

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Los Alamitos Boulevard CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026 FROM North City Limits TO Katella Avenue

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/24/2026 85th Percentile Speed 40 mph Time of Speed Survey 9:45AM 50th Percentile Speed 35 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 35 mph
10 mph Pace 30-39 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 24,402
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signals at Cerritos Ave, Sausalito St, Florista St, and Katella Ave Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks Midblock, South of Salusalito St Adjacent Land Use Commercial, school, industrial
Length of Segment 0.85 miles
Width 97 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides
On-Street Parking Both sides
Lighting At median and both sides
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 4 with raised medians and bike lanes
School Zone Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Heavy Truck Traffic Moderate

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.13 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 35 mph
Justification Heavy Pedestrian Use with an Uncontrolled Crosswalk Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY Segment 12

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
STREET Los Alamitos Boulevard CERTIFICATION DATE 3/31/2026 FROM Katella Avenue TO Bradbury Road

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
Date of Speed Survey 2/24/2026 85th Percentile Speed 38 mph Time of Speed Survey 10:22AM 50th Percentile Speed 34 mph Number of Survey Samples 200 Posted Speed Limit 35/40 mph 10 mph Pace 30-39 mph 2021 ET Speed Limit 35 mph
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 82 %
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 45,060
Date of ADT 2/26/2026

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Type of Traffic Control Traffic signals at Katella Ave and Farquhar Ave, Orangewood Ave, Rossmoor Way, and Bradbury Rd
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, residential, school
Length of Segment 1.00 miles
Width 96 feet
Sidewalks Both sides
Driveways Both sides
On-Street Parking Both sides
Lighting Both sides
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Number of Lanes 6 with raised median
School Zone Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate Truck Traffic Moderate

CRASH HISTORY
Date Range 1/1/2023-12/31/2025 Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 crashes/MVM Crash Rate 0.14 crashes/MVM

RECOMMENDATION
Speed Limit 35 mph
Justification Round Down 85th Speed
Field Study By NS Checked By FI
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of Los Alamitos was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic). 3/31/2026 TR 2933
Nicolle Spann Date State Registration Number

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms

DATE: 02/23/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 10:31AM 11:06AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WEST CITY LIMITS AND BLOOMFIELD ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3996 BALL RD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X X 0 2 2
50 X X X X 3 1 4
49 X 0 1 1
48 X 0 1 1
47 X 1 0 1
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X X X X 3 2 5
44 X X X 1 2 3
43 X X X X X 4 1 5 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8
41 X X X 2 1 3
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 85TH %: 42 40 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 50TH %: 36 35 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 15TH %: 30 30 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 3 7 10 P % IN PACE: 62% 68% 65%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 C % OVER PACE: 20% 14% 17% 29 X X X X X 3 2 5 E
28 X X X X X 2 3 5 * % UNDER PACE: 18% 18% 18%
27 X X X 1 2 3 *
26 X X X X 3 1 4 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
25 X X X 2 1 3
24 X X X 1 2 3 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 34 33 33
23 X 1 0 1
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 6 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.34 0.33 0.17
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.57 0.41 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

BALL ROAD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

DATE: 02/23/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 11:15AM 11:41AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): NORTH CITY LIMITS AND CERRITOS AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF BARCLAY DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 X 1 0 1
50 X 1 0 1
49 X X X 0 3 3
48 X X X X 3 1 4
47 X 0 1 1
46 X X X X X 3 2 5
45 X X X X 1 3 4
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X 1 0 1 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 X X X 2 1 3
41 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 85TH %: 41 41 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 50TH %: 37 36 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 15TH %: 31 31 31 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 6 15 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 10 14 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 31 - 40 31 - 40 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 2 8 10 P % IN PACE: 73% 73% 73%
31 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11 A
30 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 C % OVER PACE: 19% 16% 18%
29 X X X 0 3 3 E
28 X X X X X 4 1 5 * % UNDER PACE: 8% 11% 10%
27 X X 1 1 2 *
26 X 0 1 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 28 27 27
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.28 0.27 0.14
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.53 0.52 0.37 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

BLOOMFIELD STREET

DATE: 02/23/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 11:47AM 12:16PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): CERRITOS AVE AND KATELLA AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 10751 BLOOMFIELD ST
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X X X 1 2 3
50 X X X 2 1 3
49 X 1 0 1
48 X 0 1 1
47 X X X X X 3 2 5
46 X X 1 1 2
45 X X X X X X 4 2 6
44 X X 1 1 2
43 X X X 1 2 3 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X X X 3 3 6
41 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 85TH %: 42 42 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 8 22
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 50TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 15TH %: 32 33 33 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 33 - 42 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 9 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X 7 3 10 P % IN PACE: 75% 73% 74%
31 X X X X X 3 2 5 A
30 X X X X X X 2 4 6 C % OVER PACE: 17% 13% 17%
29 X X 1 1 2 E
28 X X 1 1 2 * % UNDER PACE: 8% 14% 10%
27 X X X 0 3 3 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 37 37 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 28 26
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.28 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.53 0.36 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

BLOOMFIELD STREET
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

DATE: 02/23/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 12:23PM 1:46PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): KATELLA AVE AND FARQUHAR AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: NORTH OF GREEN AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 25 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 0 0 0
45 0 0 0
44 0 0 0
43 0 0 0 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND
42 0 0 0
41 0 0 0
40 0 0 0 85TH %: 25 27 25 M.P.H.
39 0 0 0
38 0 0 0 50TH %: 21 22 21 M.P.H.
37 0 0 0
36 0 0 0 15TH %: 16 17 17 M.P.H.
35 0 0 0 *
34 0 0 0 * 10 MPH PACE: 15 - 24 16 - 25 15 - 24 M.P.H.
33 0 0 0 *
32 0 0 0 P % IN PACE: 83% 81% 81%
31 X X X 1 2 3 A
30 X 1 0 1 C % OVER PACE: 17% 13% 20%
29 X X X X X 2 3 5 E
28 X X X 2 1 3 * % UNDER PACE: 0% 6% 0%
27 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 *
26 X X X X X 3 2 5 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 21 21 21 M.P.H.
25 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13
24 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 15 15 15 23 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19
22 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H. 21 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20
20 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.15 0.14 0.07 19 X X X X X X X X X X X 7 4 11
18 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.39 0.37 0.27 M.P.H. 17 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 8 14
16 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13
15 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

BLOOMFIELD STREET
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

DATE: 02/24/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:02AM 9:27AM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WEST CITY LIMITS AND LOS ALAMITOS BLVD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3400 CERRITOS AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X X X 1 2 3
49 X X X 2 1 3
48 X X X 2 1 3
47 X 1 0 1
46 X X X 1 2 3
45 X X X 2 1 3
44 X X X X 3 1 4
43 X X X 1 2 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
41 X X X X 2 2 4
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11 85TH %: 42 41 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 6 12
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 50TH %: 36 35 36 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 10 21
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 15TH %: 30 29 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 33 - 42 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 *
32 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8 P % IN PACE: 70% 64% 66%
31 X X X X X X X X X 6 3 9 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 C % OVER PACE: 22% 10% 23% 29 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 E
28 X X X X X 1 4 5 * % UNDER PACE: 8% 26% 12%
27 X X X X X 3 2 5 *
26 X X X 1 2 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 36 36 36 M.P.H.
25 X 0 1 1
24 X 0 1 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 29 31 30
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 6 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.29 0.31 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.54 0.56 0.39 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

CERRITOS AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

DATE: 02/23/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 3:45PM 4:11PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): LOS ALAMITOS BLVD AND BLOOMFIELD ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3782 CERRITOS AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X X 2 0 2 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X 1 1 2
51 X X 1 1 2
50 X X X 1 2 3
49 X X X 2 1 3
48 X X 1 1 2
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X X X X X 3 2 5
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4 9 13 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 10 18
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 10 16 85TH %: 44 43 44 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17
38 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 50TH %: 38 40 39 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 11 19 15TH %: 33 34 34 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 34 - 43 34 - 43 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 *
32 X X X 2 1 3 P % IN PACE: 67% 74% 71%
31 X X X 2 1 3 A
30 X X X X X X 4 2 6 C % OVER PACE: 16% 15% 16%
29 X X 1 1 2 E
28 X X X X X 4 1 5 * % UNDER PACE: 17% 11% 14%
27 X X 0 2 2 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 39 39 39 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 33 26 29
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.26 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.57 0.51 0.38 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

CERRITOS AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

DATE: 02/23/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 3:13PM 3:39PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BLOOMFIELD ST AND LEXINGTON DR 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: WEST OF CALLE LEE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 X 1 0 1 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X 0 1 1
51 X 1 0 1
50 X X X 2 1 3
49 X X X 1 2 3
48 X X X X 3 1 4
47 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
46 X X X X X X 3 3 6
45 X X X X X X X X 5 3 8
44 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 7 11
43 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13
41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 12 23 85TH %: 45 45 45 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 50TH %: 40 40 40 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 9 17
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12 15TH %: 35 36 36 M.P.H. 35 X X X X 2 2 4 *
34 X X X X 2 2 4 * 10 MPH PACE: 36 - 45 36 - 45 36 - 45 M.P.H. 33 X X X X 1 3 4 *
32 X X X 3 0 3 P % IN PACE: 71% 75% 73%
31 X X 1 1 2 A
30 X X X X X 3 2 5 C % OVER PACE: 14% 13% 14%
29 X X 1 1 2 E
28 X X 1 1 2 * % UNDER PACE: 15% 12% 14%
27 X 1 0 1 *
26 0 0 0 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 40 40 40 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27 23 25
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.27 0.23 0.12
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.48 0.35 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

CERRITOS AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

DATE: 02/24/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 11:10AM 11:45AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): WEST CITY LIMITS AND BLOOMFIELD ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 3480 KATELLA AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 0 1 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 X 1 0 1
50 X 1 0 1
49 X X X 2 1 3
48 X X X 1 2 3
47 X X 1 1 2
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X X X X 2 2 4
43 X X X X 3 1 4 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND 42 X X X X X X X 3 4 7
41 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 7 18 85TH %: 41 41 41 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 12 21 50TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 15TH %: 31 32 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 9 15 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 34 - 43 32 - 41 33 - 42 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X 2 4 6 *
32 X X X X X X X 2 5 7 P % IN PACE: 72% 72% 71%
31 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 A
30 X X X X X 2 3 5 C % OVER PACE: 9% 15% 12%
29 X X X X X X X 4 3 7 E
28 X 1 0 1 * % UNDER PACE: 19% 13% 18%
27 X X X X 3 1 4 *
26 X X X 0 3 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 37 37 37 M.P.H.
25 X 1 0 1
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 27 26 26
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.27 0.26 0.13
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.52 0.51 0.36 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

KATELLA AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNNY
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

DATE: 02/24/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 12:01PM 12:40PM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): BLOOMFIELD ST AND WALKER ST 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 4296 KATELLA AVE
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 X 1 0 1 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 X X 2 0 2
51 X X 0 2 2
50 X X X X X 3 2 5
49 X X 1 1 2
48 X 1 0 1
47 X X X X 2 2 4
46 X 0 1 1
45 X X X X 1 3 4
44 X X X X X 3 2 5
43 X X 1 1 2 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X 3 0 3
41 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11
40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 85TH %: 42 41 42 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 5 14
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 12 20 50TH %: 37 37 37 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 14 21
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 6 7 13 15TH %: 32 32 32 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 6 13 * 10 MPH PACE: 32 - 41 32 - 41 32 - 41 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X 4 5 9 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X 8 3 11 P % IN PACE: 70% 72% 71% 31 X X X X X 1 4 5 A
30 X X X X X X X X 6 2 8 C % OVER PACE: 18% 14% 16%
29 X X X X X 2 3 5 E
28 X X 1 1 2 * % UNDER PACE: 12% 14% 13%
27 X X X X X 1 4 5 *
26 X 1 0 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 38 37 37 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 33 29 31
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 6 5 6 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.33 0.29 0.15
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.58 0.53 0.39 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

KATELLA AVENUE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

DATE: 02/23/26 DAY: Monday TIME PERIOD: 1:53PM 2:59PM
FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): KATELLA AVE AND FARQUHAR AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 11092 LEXINGTON DR
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 30 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 0 0 0
46 X 0 1 1
45 X 1 0 1
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X 0 2 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X 1 1 2
41 X X 2 0 2
40 X X X 1 2 3 85TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
39 X X 1 1 2
38 X X X 2 1 3 50TH %: 30 29 30 M.P.H.
37 X 1 0 1
36 X X X X 2 2 4 15TH %: 26 25 25 M.P.H.
35 X X X X X 2 3 5 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 * 10 MPH PACE: 25 - 34 25 - 34 25 - 34 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 7 17 P % IN PACE: 77% 73% 75% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 9 19 C % OVER PACE: 15% 14% 15% 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 10 22 E 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 6 16 * % UNDER PACE: 8% 13% 11% 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 11 18 *
26 X X X X X X X X X 5 4 9 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 30 30 30 M.P.H. 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12
24 X X X X X 2 3 5 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 25 28 27
23 X X X 1 2 3
22 X X X X X X 2 4 6 STANDARD DEVIATION: 5 5 5 M.P.H.
21 X X X 1 2 3
20 X X X 1 2 3 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.25 0.28 0.13
19 X 1 0 1
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.50 0.53 0.37 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF PICO RIVERA
TO

LEXINGTON DRIVE
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR

DATE: 02/24/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 9:45AM 10:14AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND NB SB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): NORTH CITY LIMITS AND KATELLA AVE 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 10821 LOS ALAMITOS BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 40 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 X 0 1 1
49 X 1 0 1
48 X X X 0 3 3
47 X 0 1 1
46 X 1 0 1
45 X X X 1 2 3
44 X X X 2 1 3
43 X X 1 1 2 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND+SOUTHBOUND 42 X X X X 2 2 4
41 X X X 2 1 3
40 X X X X X X X X X X X 6 5 11 85TH %: 40 40 40 M.P.H. 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 7 12
38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 5 12 50TH %: 35 35 35 M.P.H. 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 8 16
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 7 16 15TH %: 31 30 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 11 9 20 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 8 18 * 10 MPH PACE: 31 - 40 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 6 14 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 9 16 P % IN PACE: 76% 73% 74% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 5 6 11 A
30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 8 13 C % OVER PACE: 10% 17% 17% 29 X X X X X X X X 3 5 8 E
28 X X X X X X 3 3 6 * % UNDER PACE: 14% 10% 10%
27 X X X X 3 1 4 *
26 X 0 1 1 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 35 35 M.P.H.
25 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 26 22
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 5 5 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.26 0.11
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.51 0.33 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

LOS ALAMITOS BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
35

DATE: 02/24/26 DAY: Tuesday TIME PERIOD: 10:22AM 10:51AM FOR ROADWAY:

SPEED TOTAL VEHICLES SURVEYED TOTAL
(MPH) EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND EB WB VEHICLES LIMITS (BTN): KATELLA AVE AND BRADBURY RD 65 0 0 0
64 0 0 0 OBSERVATION POINT: 11322 LOS ALAMITOS BLVD
63 0 0 0
62 0 0 0
61 0 0 0 POSTED SPEED LIMIT: 35 MPH OBSERVER:
60 0 0 0
59 0 0 0 COMMENTS: WEATHER:
58 0 0 0
57 0 0 0 ROAD SURFACE:
56 0 0 0
55 0 0 0 ROAD CONDITION:
54 0 0 0
53 0 0 0 DATA COLLECTION METHOD:
52 0 0 0
51 0 0 0
50 0 0 0
49 0 0 0
48 0 0 0
47 X X 2 0 2
46 X X 1 1 2
45 X X 1 1 2
44 X X 2 0 2
43 X X X 1 2 3 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND EASTBOUND+WESTBOUND
42 X X X 2 1 3
41 X X X 1 2 3
40 X X X 2 1 3 85TH %: 39 38 38 M.P.H.
39 X X X X X X X X X X 4 6 10
38 X X X X X X X X X X 5 5 10 50TH %: 34 34 34 M.P.H.
37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15
36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 10 17 15TH %: 31 30 30 M.P.H. 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9 8 17 *
34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 9 23 * 10 MPH PACE: 30 - 39 30 - 39 30 - 39 M.P.H. 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 10 20 *
32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 7 8 15 P % IN PACE: 82% 82% 82% 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 10 12 22 A 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 8 7 15 C % OVER PACE: 12% 8% 10% 29 X X X X X 3 2 5 E
28 X 0 1 1 * % UNDER PACE: 6% 10% 8%
27 X X X 2 1 3 *
26 X X X 0 3 3 * ARITHMETIC MEAN: 35 34 34 M.P.H.
25 X X X 0 3 3
24 X 1 0 1 SAMPLE VARIANCE: 19 18 19
23 0 0 0
22 0 0 0 STANDARD DEVIATION: 4 4 4 M.P.H.
21 0 0 0
20 0 0 0 VARIANCE OF THE MEAN: 0.19 0.18 0.09
19 0 0 0
18 0 0 0 STD. ERROR OF THE MEAN: 0.44 0.43 0.31 M.P.H.
17 0 0 0
16 0 0 0
15 0 0 0
100 100 200

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
TO

LOS ALAMITOS BOULEVARD
CARLOS

PARTLY SUNN
DRY
FAIR
RADAR
35/40 Page 241 of 575
2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS

APPENDIX C
ADT Count Sheets

Ball Road Btwn
West City Limit & Bloomfield Street

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 18 154 21 181
12:15 17 163 13 163
12:30 22 123 12 180
12:45 6 185 63 625 9 167 55 691 118 1316
01:00 9 187 4 176
01:15 6 148 6 174
01:30 4 147 5 176
01:45 9 179 28 661 5 179 20 705 48 1366
02:00 6 177 4 183
02:15 6 209 4 182
02:30 7 193 5 222
02:45 2 199 21 778 1 211 14 798 35 1576
03:00 6 248 8 228
03:15 5 283 8 289
03:30 5 264 8 266
03:45 9 264 25 1059 9 272 33 1055 58 2114
04:00 9 275 8 251
04:15 4 292 14 271
04:30 16 309 13 263
04:45 30 313 59 1189 24 281 59 1066 118 2255
05:00 21 282 31 325
05:15 23 310 54 290
05:30 31 280 76 282
05:45 44 274 119 1146 73 279 234 1176 353 2322
06:00 44 263 82 259
06:15 35 235 96 232
06:30 71 185 148 197
06:45 91 222 241 905 194 187 520 875 761 1780
07:00 103 163 221 170
07:15 185 145 314 143
07:30 196 118 297 118
07:45 211 140 695 566 245 115 1077 546 1772 1112
08:00 235 111 266 119
08:15 295 101 299 103
08:30 205 89 250 81
08:45 180 83 915 384 248 93 1063 396 1978 780
09:00 138 79 205 86
09:15 132 72 201 70
09:30 137 64 168 54
09:45 131 64 538 279 178 35 752 245 1290 524
10:00 130 46 156 37
10:15 131 45 149 38
10:30 123 41 150 34
10:45 154 24 538 156 157 41 612 150 1150 306
11:00 125 25 167 39
11:15 150 24 147 23
11:30 135 17 157 33
11:45 150 24 560 90 169 27 640 122 1200 212
Total 3802 7838 5079 7825 8881 15663
Percent 32.7% 67.3% 39.4% 60.6% 36.2% 63.8%
Grand
Total 3802 7838 5079 7825 8881 15663
Percent 32.7% 67.3% 39.4% 60.6% 36.2% 63.8%
ADT ADT 24,544 AADT 24,544

Bloomfield Street Btwn
North City Limit & Cerritos Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 7 89 8 109
12:15 6 106 4 89
12:30 6 113 7 115
12:45 8 115 27 423 3 118 22 431 49 854
01:00 3 95 1 144
01:15 2 116 1 117
01:30 6 104 1 86
01:45 2 100 13 415 2 121 5 468 18 883
02:00 4 120 3 124
02:15 3 157 4 107
02:30 3 197 3 141
02:45 1 132 11 606 5 123 15 495 26 1101
03:00 2 117 3 132
03:15 3 215 7 139
03:30 1 169 0 104
03:45 3 152 9 653 18 141 28 516 37 1169
04:00 2 181 12 124
04:15 11 168 17 135
04:30 9 189 11 134
04:45 6 194 28 732 32 158 72 551 100 1283
05:00 10 206 20 130
05:15 20 200 32 107
05:30 15 202 36 124
05:45 13 200 58 808 45 127 133 488 191 1296
06:00 16 162 41 105
06:15 18 140 60 117
06:30 27 153 90 86
06:45 26 95 87 550 98 98 289 406 376 956
07:00 37 128 103 83
07:15 56 115 152 64
07:30 88 82 226 58
07:45 117 94 298 419 183 51 664 256 962 675
08:00 104 92 195 39
08:15 107 75 211 49
08:30 108 61 183 32
08:45 83 84 402 312 158 38 747 158 1149 470
09:00 68 87 100 32
09:15 69 49 117 35
09:30 65 37 108 30
09:45 79 21 281 194 99 16 424 113 705 307
10:00 82 23 90 25
10:15 72 24 90 14
10:30 82 27 92 14
10:45 79 27 315 101 98 17 370 70 685 171
11:00 86 18 79 5
11:15 98 21 101 5
11:30 92 21 86 11
11:45 87 10 363 70 95 6 361 27 724 97
Total 1892 5283 3130 3979 5022 9262
Percent 26.4% 73.6% 44.0% 56.0% 35.2% 64.8%
Grand
Total 1892 5283 3130 3979 5022 9262
Percent 26.4% 73.6% 44.0% 56.0% 35.2% 64.8%
ADT ADT 14,284 AADT 14,284

Bloomfield Street Btwn
Cerritos Avenue & Katella Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 11 118 9 119
12:15 8 112 4 120
12:30 7 108 6 117
12:45 3 113 29 451 1 156 20 512 49 963
01:00 2 104 2 163
01:15 3 139 2 125
01:30 2 121 3 90
01:45 2 110 9 474 5 162 12 540 21 1014
02:00 4 150 8 167
02:15 5 188 6 177
02:30 3 220 4 164
02:45 0 182 12 740 4 163 22 671 34 1411
03:00 2 214 2 145
03:15 5 171 4 246
03:30 2 183 1 165
03:45 4 185 13 753 7 176 14 732 27 1485
04:00 4 200 11 168
04:15 12 200 21 196
04:30 6 261 12 181
04:45 24 234 46 895 14 187 58 732 104 1627
05:00 12 303 17 204
05:15 16 237 35 153
05:30 21 262 32 160
05:45 20 194 69 996 50 175 134 692 203 1688
06:00 22 177 57 131
06:15 21 177 89 138
06:30 38 176 96 160
06:45 43 130 124 660 117 137 359 566 483 1226
07:00 55 156 113 115
07:15 82 113 176 105
07:30 169 85 259 76
07:45 217 89 523 443 240 78 788 374 1311 817
08:00 227 104 200 90
08:15 202 72 200 76
08:30 152 58 214 45
08:45 80 110 661 344 170 86 784 297 1445 641
09:00 79 68 116 43
09:15 78 45 121 39
09:30 76 39 122 27
09:45 77 29 310 181 122 25 481 134 791 315
10:00 82 42 108 16
10:15 70 22 92 11
10:30 77 21 114 19
10:45 92 23 321 108 105 12 419 58 740 166
11:00 98 14 89 9
11:15 101 24 119 7
11:30 86 25 123 10
11:45 91 7 376 70 121 13 452 39 828 109
Total 2493 6115 3543 5347 6036 11462
Percent 29.0% 71.0% 39.9% 60.1% 34.5% 65.5%
Grand
Total 2493 6115 3543 5347 6036 11462
Percent 29.0% 71.0% 39.9% 60.1% 34.5% 65.5%
ADT ADT 17,498 AADT 17,498

Bloomfield Street Btwn
Katella Avenue & Farquhar Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 2 26 0 24
12:15 5 21 0 18
12:30 1 21 2 16
12:45 3 29 11 97 1 42 3 100 14 197
01:00 3 20 0 23
01:15 2 28 1 26
01:30 0 21 0 18
01:45 0 22 5 91 0 24 1 91 6 182
02:00 1 23 0 28
02:15 0 39 1 45
02:30 0 37 4 33
02:45 1 34 2 133 0 41 5 147 7 280
03:00 0 45 0 64
03:15 0 64 2 41
03:30 0 49 0 42
03:45 1 40 1 198 3 61 5 208 6 406
04:00 0 42 0 54
04:15 0 43 2 54
04:30 0 40 1 66
04:45 2 46 2 171 5 83 8 257 10 428
05:00 2 41 4 69
05:15 0 41 11 52
05:30 2 39 13 51
05:45 3 51 7 172 16 46 44 218 51 390
06:00 3 28 10 35
06:15 8 39 9 36
06:30 2 34 13 42
06:45 12 24 25 125 24 32 56 145 81 270
07:00 6 30 19 34
07:15 20 29 40 8
07:30 28 14 63 16
07:45 37 18 91 91 60 13 182 71 273 162
08:00 32 28 79 14
08:15 36 31 74 9
08:30 39 15 55 16
08:45 41 25 148 99 31 4 239 43 387 142
09:00 25 13 19 9
09:15 19 9 24 5
09:30 14 8 20 5
09:45 25 8 83 38 31 10 94 29 177 67
10:00 13 3 16 1
10:15 20 5 15 6
10:30 16 5 20 4
10:45 22 5 71 18 18 2 69 13 140 31
11:00 23 6 18 6
11:15 23 3 30 1
11:30 20 4 22 3
11:45 33 3 99 16 28 0 98 10 197 26
Total 545 1249 804 1332 1349 2581
Percent 30.4% 69.6% 37.6% 62.4% 34.3% 65.7%
Grand
Total 545 1249 804 1332 1349 2581
Percent 30.4% 69.6% 37.6% 62.4% 34.3% 65.7%
ADT ADT 3,930 AADT 3,930

Cerritos Avenue Btwn
West City Limit & Los Alamitos Boulevard

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 17 202 27 195
12:15 21 188 22 190
12:30 11 167 35 188
12:45 15 208 64 765 23 210 107 783 171 1548
01:00 12 218 14 178
01:15 11 207 18 183
01:30 4 212 18 192
01:45 12 230 39 867 8 199 58 752 97 1619
02:00 21 234 9 185
02:15 12 287 8 258
02:30 23 245 18 276
02:45 21 248 77 1014 14 180 49 899 126 1913
03:00 18 297 18 206
03:15 16 334 12 277
03:30 26 277 27 304
03:45 39 295 99 1203 31 253 88 1040 187 2243
04:00 30 349 40 268
04:15 44 379 61 270
04:30 70 338 56 278
04:45 92 414 236 1480 67 281 224 1097 460 2577
05:00 72 312 70 290
05:15 98 340 106 272
05:30 95 319 112 306
05:45 200 312 465 1283 86 228 374 1096 839 2379
06:00 110 286 137 262
06:15 118 268 133 214
06:30 140 185 181 209
06:45 193 230 561 969 215 154 666 839 1227 1808
07:00 183 177 247 172
07:15 282 166 261 137
07:30 245 145 303 130
07:45 344 139 1054 627 257 128 1068 567 2122 1194
08:00 385 106 227 166
08:15 335 97 239 133
08:30 219 108 281 97
08:45 234 86 1173 397 209 136 956 532 2129 929
09:00 199 85 207 123
09:15 202 69 209 93
09:30 170 69 182 82
09:45 179 53 750 276 211 71 809 369 1559 645
10:00 169 44 181 62
10:15 181 52 171 73
10:30 165 34 162 55
10:45 196 46 711 176 138 43 652 233 1363 409
11:00 185 22 181 51
11:15 183 25 160 49
11:30 175 26 206 65
11:45 209 29 752 102 145 32 692 197 1444 299
Total 5981 9159 5743 8404 11724 17563
Percent 39.5% 60.5% 40.6% 59.4% 40.0% 60.0%
Grand
Total 5981 9159 5743 8404 11724 17563
Percent 39.5% 60.5% 40.6% 59.4% 40.0% 60.0%
ADT ADT 29,287 AADT 29,287

Cerritos Avenue Btwn
Los Alamitos Boulevard & Bloomfield St

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 11 190 19 258
12:15 23 182 15 214
12:30 12 161 25 233
12:45 20 241 66 774 13 189 72 894 138 1668
01:00 14 195 8 180
01:15 14 190 9 230
01:30 6 183 13 245
01:45 11 181 45 749 3 231 33 886 78 1635
02:00 21 196 10 242
02:15 15 262 8 236
02:30 17 253 10 307
02:45 17 258 70 969 16 256 44 1041 114 2010
03:00 21 273 13 294
03:15 13 293 12 421
03:30 27 257 12 322
03:45 48 278 109 1101 20 310 57 1347 166 2448
04:00 25 292 28 324
04:15 50 305 64 369
04:30 72 296 50 281
04:45 96 315 243 1208 68 297 210 1271 453 2479
05:00 66 290 63 289
05:15 76 274 100 335
05:30 92 305 99 314
05:45 160 283 394 1152 84 256 346 1194 740 2346
06:00 95 297 126 227
06:15 106 234 136 224
06:30 109 261 192 230
06:45 144 220 454 1012 225 160 679 841 1133 1853
07:00 137 202 209 156
07:15 190 200 300 122
07:30 185 151 313 130
07:45 211 172 723 725 264 104 1086 512 1809 1237
08:00 205 121 362 137
08:15 210 121 369 107
08:30 207 121 260 85
08:45 208 103 830 466 208 147 1199 476 2029 942
09:00 162 99 197 124
09:15 161 82 196 91
09:30 156 76 185 70
09:45 162 57 641 314 205 45 783 330 1424 644
10:00 148 48 152 43
10:15 171 58 169 43
10:30 154 39 192 32
10:45 166 34 639 179 181 45 694 163 1333 342
11:00 172 29 195 22
11:15 155 29 205 31
11:30 155 31 247 49
11:45 211 30 693 119 161 14 808 116 1501 235
Total 4907 8768 6011 9071 10918 17839
Percent 35.9% 64.1% 39.9% 60.1% 38.0% 62.0%
Grand
Total 4907 8768 6011 9071 10918 17839
Percent 35.9% 64.1% 39.9% 60.1% 38.0% 62.0%
ADT ADT 28,757 AADT 28,757

Cerritos Avenue Btwn
Bloomfield Street & Lexington Drive

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 14 180 19 197
12:15 20 174 12 165
12:30 14 162 23 182
12:45 22 201 70 717 20 142 74 686 144 1403
01:00 13 172 6 152
01:15 14 201 10 166
01:30 7 220 16 189
01:45 9 191 43 784 4 188 36 695 79 1479
02:00 15 178 11 194
02:15 12 215 8 192
02:30 19 249 3 236
02:45 16 267 62 909 11 224 33 846 95 1755
03:00 22 264 13 215
03:15 13 286 12 273
03:30 25 294 11 275
03:45 48 243 108 1087 25 264 61 1027 169 2114
04:00 29 275 24 279
04:15 59 313 49 278
04:30 63 294 65 287
04:45 103 329 254 1211 73 264 211 1108 465 2319
05:00 70 321 66 306
05:15 91 331 81 285
05:30 92 296 89 269
05:45 163 282 416 1230 102 239 338 1099 754 2329
06:00 89 292 119 233
06:15 106 227 140 198
06:30 98 215 171 218
06:45 159 216 452 950 220 147 650 796 1102 1746
07:00 116 202 215 154
07:15 164 198 265 124
07:30 205 134 261 123
07:45 210 162 695 696 256 114 997 515 1692 1211
08:00 247 128 272 107
08:15 223 126 265 93
08:30 245 110 239 102
08:45 218 115 933 479 215 95 991 397 1924 876
09:00 166 85 194 99
09:15 171 72 166 90
09:30 147 68 177 66
09:45 157 57 641 282 187 38 724 293 1365 575
10:00 161 55 152 31
10:15 164 56 143 45
10:30 155 29 183 31
10:45 169 38 649 178 154 46 632 153 1281 331
11:00 188 25 148 25
11:15 151 37 170 34
11:30 161 28 180 36
11:45 191 24 691 114 129 16 627 111 1318 225
Total 5014 8637 5374 7726 10388 16363
Percent 36.7% 63.3% 41.0% 59.0% 38.8% 61.2%
Grand
Total 5014 8637 5374 7726 10388 16363
Percent 36.7% 63.3% 41.0% 59.0% 38.8% 61.2%
ADT ADT 26,751 AADT 26,751

Katella Avenue Btwn
West City Limit & Bloomfield Street

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 21 386 34 432
12:15 40 388 14 439
12:30 28 406 38 417
12:45 21 384 110 1564 24 398 110 1686 220 3250
01:00 22 354 21 376
01:15 20 413 17 364
01:30 15 454 13 371
01:45 15 441 72 1662 13 426 64 1537 136 3199
02:00 23 451 8 418
02:15 20 396 12 481
02:30 21 432 17 431
02:45 18 492 82 1771 8 482 45 1812 127 3583
03:00 30 487 13 398
03:15 30 409 7 500
03:30 21 464 7 469
03:45 36 497 117 1857 13 443 40 1810 157 3667
04:00 46 545 26 498
04:15 24 521 35 456
04:30 60 547 44 470
04:45 136 492 266 2105 34 541 139 1965 405 4070
05:00 93 496 86 514
05:15 134 482 97 498
05:30 137 559 119 472
05:45 255 503 619 2040 116 471 418 1955 1037 3995
06:00 169 471 156 448
06:15 207 494 194 409
06:30 238 400 263 476
06:45 357 436 971 1801 260 366 873 1699 1844 3500
07:00 358 321 288 366
07:15 404 367 323 362
07:30 453 266 436 299
07:45 537 287 1752 1241 350 265 1397 1292 3149 2533
08:00 546 198 357 291
08:15 535 231 371 276
08:30 514 230 426 171
08:45 509 196 2104 855 328 240 1482 978 3586 1833
09:00 455 183 309 221
09:15 430 158 310 135
09:30 448 157 372 95
09:45 450 127 1783 625 342 99 1333 550 3116 1175
10:00 462 115 303 72
10:15 435 94 368 76
10:30 399 80 332 63
10:45 425 71 1721 360 330 58 1333 269 3054 629
11:00 373 55 372 49
11:15 402 65 408 49
11:30 352 53 419 69
11:45 385 43 1512 216 415 47 1614 214 3126 430
Total 11109 16097 8848 15767 19957 31864
Percent 40.8% 59.2% 35.9% 64.1% 38.5% 61.5%
Grand
Total 11109 16097 8848 15767 19957 31864
Percent 40.8% 59.2% 35.9% 64.1% 38.5% 61.5%
ADT ADT 51,821 AADT 51,821

Katella Avenue Btwn
Bloomfield Street & Walker Street

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 East Hour Totals West Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 38 583 48 473
12:15 39 522 18 475
12:30 44 514 21 519
12:45 30 512 151 2131 22 502 109 1969 260 4100
01:00 19 486 18 448
01:15 21 470 11 468
01:30 17 549 19 480
01:45 21 509 78 2014 14 493 62 1889 140 3903
02:00 27 585 14 447
02:15 22 571 14 426
02:30 21 700 12 510
02:45 23 604 93 2460 9 499 49 1882 142 4342
03:00 33 598 16 452
03:15 37 654 13 448
03:30 17 671 21 544
03:45 45 586 132 2509 30 541 80 1985 212 4494
04:00 50 723 31 554
04:15 50 702 36 545
04:30 69 742 75 559
04:45 142 630 311 2797 91 549 233 2207 544 5004
05:00 116 724 92 574
05:15 199 681 91 645
05:30 166 603 127 516
05:45 231 630 712 2638 185 501 495 2236 1207 4874
06:00 193 564 135 477
06:15 257 585 253 576
06:30 246 536 285 475
06:45 333 452 1029 2137 321 437 994 1965 2023 4102
07:00 362 448 346 397
07:15 451 421 376 366
07:30 449 418 445 338
07:45 511 284 1773 1571 484 285 1651 1386 3424 2957
08:00 545 328 371 248
08:15 563 278 474 235
08:30 526 278 428 232
08:45 546 249 2180 1133 392 195 1665 910 3845 2043
09:00 516 250 340 198
09:15 494 197 404 166
09:30 562 176 393 121
09:45 515 135 2087 758 429 128 1566 613 3653 1371
10:00 577 130 337 112
10:15 556 98 466 95
10:30 457 84 431 72
10:45 545 71 2135 383 414 68 1648 347 3783 730
11:00 472 78 413 69
11:15 542 51 476 82
11:30 540 66 457 69
11:45 547 47 2101 242 437 72 1783 292 3884 534
Total 12782 20773 10335 17681 23117 38454
Percent 38.1% 61.9% 36.9% 63.1% 37.5% 62.5%
Grand
Total 12782 20773 10335 17681 23117 38454
Percent 38.1% 61.9% 36.9% 63.1% 37.5% 62.5%
ADT ADT 61,571 AADT 61,571

Lexington Drive Btwn
Katella Avenue & Farquhar Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 0 51 2 53
12:15 3 66 5 41
12:30 2 40 15 48
12:45 1 43 6 200 2 53 24 195 30 395
01:00 1 37 2 42
01:15 0 25 0 28
01:30 3 40 4 35
01:45 1 40 5 142 4 27 10 132 15 274
02:00 1 43 0 47
02:15 0 48 4 37
02:30 0 51 0 37
02:45 1 56 2 198 3 30 7 151 9 349
03:00 1 70 1 38
03:15 1 47 0 44
03:30 1 77 4 47
03:45 3 79 6 273 4 52 9 181 15 454
04:00 4 91 3 37
04:15 4 81 4 40
04:30 3 73 4 33
04:45 8 67 19 312 6 39 17 149 36 461
05:00 10 82 16 54
05:15 6 42 15 46
05:30 10 40 19 53
05:45 12 45 38 209 54 41 104 194 142 403
06:00 9 74 35 37
06:15 20 33 34 48
06:30 20 50 29 38
06:45 18 24 67 181 53 32 151 155 218 336
07:00 23 23 55 27
07:15 29 19 50 29
07:30 36 17 60 25
07:45 46 21 134 80 45 28 210 109 344 189
08:00 38 21 57 22
08:15 51 24 67 22
08:30 65 22 37 20
08:45 33 29 187 96 71 10 232 74 419 170
09:00 25 23 54 22
09:15 28 16 50 18
09:30 32 6 40 11
09:45 37 13 122 58 32 10 176 61 298 119
10:00 28 8 24 5
10:15 30 4 40 12
10:30 20 11 30 5
10:45 24 4 102 27 33 3 127 25 229 52
11:00 48 1 38 6
11:15 36 3 40 15
11:30 56 3 37 7
11:45 41 4 181 11 42 19 157 47 338 58
Total 869 1787 1224 1473 2093 3260
Percent 32.7% 67.3% 45.4% 54.6% 39.1% 60.9%
Grand
Total 869 1787 1224 1473 2093 3260
Percent 32.7% 67.3% 45.4% 54.6% 39.1% 60.9%
ADT ADT 5,353 AADT 5,353

Los Alamitos Boulevard Btwn
North City Limit & Katella Avenue

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 19 192 22 203
12:15 18 233 11 185
12:30 27 224 8 197
12:45 13 186 77 835 10 249 51 834 128 1669
01:00 17 184 2 210
01:15 20 179 6 181
01:30 8 197 6 189
01:45 9 193 54 753 7 198 21 778 75 1531
02:00 7 241 2 189
02:15 7 243 4 234
02:30 8 210 9 242
02:45 6 243 28 937 9 185 24 850 52 1787
03:00 6 256 10 171
03:15 2 227 12 284
03:30 9 239 10 257
03:45 10 229 27 951 16 211 48 923 75 1874
04:00 13 282 14 179
04:15 11 259 19 234
04:30 10 261 22 232
04:45 21 264 55 1066 27 205 82 850 137 1916
05:00 26 301 42 193
05:15 39 239 56 212
05:30 23 294 68 189
05:45 28 268 116 1102 67 229 233 823 349 1925
06:00 56 226 73 207
06:15 56 272 96 199
06:30 53 251 127 166
06:45 80 209 245 958 145 158 441 730 686 1688
07:00 111 183 143 168
07:15 206 158 203 141
07:30 134 132 265 146
07:45 160 141 611 614 237 128 848 583 1459 1197
08:00 256 125 196 151
08:15 228 146 240 89
08:30 178 107 250 95
08:45 136 106 798 484 190 91 876 426 1674 910
09:00 131 95 174 80
09:15 137 90 143 57
09:30 161 89 197 42
09:45 160 75 589 349 157 33 671 212 1260 561
10:00 157 59 162 50
10:15 156 61 137 32
10:30 189 49 177 25
10:45 158 48 660 217 186 21 662 128 1322 345
11:00 175 47 205 15
11:15 185 34 190 19
11:30 193 28 182 14
11:45 233 38 786 147 211 13 788 61 1574 208
Total 4046 8413 4745 7198 8791 15611
Percent 32.5% 67.5% 39.7% 60.3% 36.0% 64.0%
Grand
Total 4046 8413 4745 7198 8791 15611
Percent 32.5% 67.5% 39.7% 60.3% 36.0% 64.0%
ADT ADT 24,402 AADT 24,402

Los Alamitos Boulevard Btwn
Katella Avenue & Bradbury Road

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM
Start 2/26/2026 North Hour Totals South Hour Totals Combined Totals Time Thu Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon 12:00 19 342 29 422
12:15 31 359 12 388
12:30 16 344 16 385
12:45 14 340 80 1385 9 415 66 1610 146 2995
01:00 13 312 21 414
01:15 8 331 4 367
01:30 12 339 4 359
01:45 6 364 39 1346 4 388 33 1528 72 2874
02:00 8 397 10 374
02:15 5 392 7 388
02:30 10 391 18 505
02:45 5 442 28 1622 5 421 40 1688 68 3310
03:00 5 449 15 443
03:15 6 350 17 529
03:30 8 398 8 558
03:45 12 433 31 1630 19 484 59 2014 90 3644
04:00 14 458 18 522
04:15 18 464 18 481
04:30 17 468 28 532
04:45 39 455 88 1845 26 494 90 2029 178 3874
05:00 30 408 46 529
05:15 28 462 53 450
05:30 53 420 74 418
05:45 74 436 185 1726 100 475 273 1872 458 3598
06:00 69 412 106 436
06:15 99 366 138 417
06:30 129 397 242 398
06:45 186 368 483 1543 273 350 759 1601 1242 3144
07:00 244 311 307 342
07:15 306 241 325 334
07:30 320 230 419 302
07:45 408 203 1278 985 444 282 1495 1260 2773 2245
08:00 478 184 389 307
08:15 390 192 345 264
08:30 377 148 394 231
08:45 264 151 1509 675 436 222 1564 1024 3073 1699
09:00 242 128 392 228
09:15 306 135 318 130
09:30 265 94 346 126
09:45 315 97 1128 454 321 76 1377 560 2505 1014
10:00 238 87 294 75
10:15 275 73 342 66
10:30 307 49 371 42
10:45 309 74 1129 283 352 43 1359 226 2488 509
11:00 291 50 347 39
11:15 333 40 379 27
11:30 338 25 398 23
11:45 309 34 1271 149 385 43 1509 132 2780 281
Total 7249 13643 8624 15544 15873 29187
Percent 34.7% 65.3% 35.7% 64.3% 35.2% 64.8%
Grand
Total 7249 13643 8624 15544 15873 29187
Percent 34.7% 65.3% 35.7% 64.3% 35.2% 64.8%
ADT ADT 45,060 AADT 45,060

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS

APPENDIX D
Survey Equipment

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Survey Equipment Used
The radar equipment used by City Traffic Counters to collect speed measurements for this survey was a Stalker-II SDR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar and a Stalker-ATR Model Hand-Held Traffic Radar both manufactured by Applied Concepts of Plano, Texas. The calibration of each unit was checked before each series of measurements were taken. Tests of the units were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. The Stalker-II SDR Hand-Held Traffic Radar and Stalker-ATR Model HandHeld Traffic Radar were last calibrated on January 16, 2023 by Southern California Radar/Laser Certification Laboratory.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS

APPENDIX E
Legislative References

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Applicable Sections of California Vehicle Code
The following sections of the CVC are from the most recently published CVC as of August 2023 and contain new sections pertaining to AB 43.

Engineering and Traffic Surveys
Section 627.
(a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
(b) An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1) Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2) Accident records.
(3) Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c) When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1) Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(L) Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses of business structures.
(M)Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(N) The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B).
(2) Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Basic Speed Law
Section 22350.

No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.

Speed Law Violations
Section 22351.
(a) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway not in excess of the limits specified in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is lawful unless clearly proved to be in violation of the basic speed law.
(b) The speed of any vehicle upon a highway in excess of the prima facie speed limits in Section 22352 or established as authorized in this code is prima facie unlawful unless the defendant establishes by competent evidence that the speed in excess of said limits did not constitute a violation of the basic speed law at the time, place and under the conditions then existing.

Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22352.

The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a) Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along such railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagman is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car. (2) When traversing any intersection of highways, if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection, the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3) On any alley.
(b) Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway other than a state highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority under procedures set forth in this code.

Section 22357.1.

Notwithstanding Section 22357, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, set a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any street, other than a state highway, adjacent to any children’s

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
playground in a public park but only during particular hours or days when children are expected to use the facilities. The 25 mile per hour speed limit shall be effective when signs giving notice of the speed limit are posted.

Section 22358.4
(a)
(1) Wherever a local authority determines upon the basis on an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour established by subdivision (b) of Section 22352 is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority my, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is justified as the appropriate speed limit by that survey.
(2) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected up on the highway.
(b)
(1) Notwithstanding subdivision (a) or any other provision of law, a local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare prima facie speed limits as follows:
(A) A 15 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance less than 500 feet from, or passing, a school building or the grounds of a school building, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of less than 500 feet from, or passing, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 15 miles per hour.
(B) A 25 miles per hour prima facie limit in a residence district, on a highway with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour or slower, when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour, while children are going to or leaving the school, either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching, at a distance of 500 to 1,000 feet from, school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a school warning sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A) A maximum of two traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior and after the school zone.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
(3) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply to all lanes of an affected highway, in both directions of travel.
(4) When determining the need to lower the prima facie speed limit, the local authority shall take the provisions of Section 627 into consideration.
(5)
(A) An ordinance or resolution adopted under paragraph (1) shall not be effective until appropriate signs giving notice of the speed limit are erected upon the highway and, in the case of a state highway, until the ordinance is approved by the Department of Transportation and the appropriate signs are erected upon the highway. (B) For the purposes of subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 15 miles per hour may be placed at a distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(C) For the purposes of subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1), school warning signs indicating a speed limit of 25 miles per hour may be placed at a distance between 500 and 1,000 feet away from school grounds.

Business Activity Districts
Section 22358.9.
(a)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2) The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the flowing conditions:
(A) A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B) A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit. (C) A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit. (b) As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that a portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1) No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway.
(2) Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway. (3) Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
(4) Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c) A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Section 22358.7, has retained the currently adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8, or has restored the immediately prior adopted speed limit under Section 22358.8. (d) A local authority shall issue only warning citation for violation of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Minimum and Maximum Prima Facie Speed Limits
Section 22357.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles per hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise subject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit, which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.

Section 22358.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

Section 22358.3.

Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour in a business or residence district or in a public park on any street having a roadway not exceeding 25 feet in width, other than a state highway, is more than reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance or resolution, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate and is reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
Section 22360.
(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the speed limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a highway other than a state highway for a distance of not exceeding 2,000 feet in length between district, either business or residence, the local authority may determine and declare a reasonable and safe prima facie limit thereon lower than 65 mile per hour, but not less than 25 miles per hour, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street or highway.

Downward Speed Zoning
Section 22358.5.

It is the intent of the Legislature that physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning, as the basic rule of Section 22350 is sufficient regulation as to such conditions.

Safety Corridors (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.7.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1) The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2) A portion of the highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(3) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government code, whichever is sooner.
(4) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Maintaining Posted Speeds (Added code from AB 43)
Section 22358.8.
(a) If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established that speed limit. (b) This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit. (c) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

Boundary Line Streets
Section 22359.

With respect to boundary line streets and highways where portions thereof are within different jurisdictions, no ordinance adopted under Sections 22357 and 22358 shall be effective as to any such portion until all authorities having jurisdiction of the portions of the street concerned have approved the same. This section shall not apply in the case of boundary line streets consisting of separate roadways within different jurisdictions.

Speed Trap Prohibition
Section 40801.

No peace officer or other person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution under this code.

Speed Trap
Section 40802.
(a) A "speed trap" is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving object. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
(b)
(1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
(3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour of 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (c)
(1) When all the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (B) When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C)
(i) The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D). (ii) The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS
alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility.
(2) A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance. (B)
(i) A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years. (ii) This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.

Speed Trap Evidence
Section 40803.
(a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap. (b) In any prosecution under this code of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802.

When a traffic and engineering survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) subdivision (a) of Section 40802.

2026 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS

City of Los Alamitos

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
MEETING DATE: April 20, 2026 ITEM NUMBER: 11H
To: Mayor Tanya Doby & Members of the City Council
Presented By: Ron Noda, Assistant City Manager/Development Services Director Chris Kelley, City Engineer
Subject: Approval of Plans and Specifications — Authorization to Bid for Reagan Street Improvements Project (CIP 25/26-06)

SUMMARY
This item recommends actions to begin facilitating construction of the Street Improvements under CIP 25/26-06 on Reagan Street.

RECOMMENDATION

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the construction of the Reagan St. Street Improvement Project - CIP 25/26-06; and,

2. Authorize Staff to advertise and solicit bid proposals.

BACKGROUND
The City of Los Alamitos proposes to grind and overlay a residential street as part of the City’s ongoing pavement management program. The project will also include replacing damaged curb and gutter to improve drainage, repairing lifted sidewalks and deteriorated driveways, modifying ADA curb ramps to meet current accessibility standards, and repairing cross gutters to enhance drainage flow.

This project includes improvements to the following street segment:
• Reagan Street (Farquhar Avenue to Katella Avenue)
This project is also being funded, in part, through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The CDBG Program is a federally funded initiative administered by the U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that provides communities with resources to address a wide range of development needs, with a primary focus on benefiting low- and moderate-income populations. Eligible activities include public infrastructure improvements, neighborhood revitalization, and accessibility and safety enhancements. By applying for and receiving CDBG funds, the City can advance critical infrastructure improvements while supporting broader community development goals, including improved accessibility, enhanced safety, and overall neighborhood quality.

DISCUSSION

The following is an approximate timeline for the completion of the street improvement project:
•04/20/2026 Approval of plans & specifications by the City Council •04/23/2026 Advertise project for bids
•05/14/2026 Bid opening
•06/15/2026 Award of Contract (City Council Meeting)
•08/01/2026 Start of construction
•09/30/2026 End of construction

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for this project is included in the 2026-2027 budget and includes funds as shown below:

Available funding for the projects is provided as follows:

Budget Fiscal
Year
Source Amount
2025-26 CDBG $297,500
2025-26 General Fund $200,000
Project Total $497,500
Attachment: 1. CDBG Reagan Street Improvements - Plans

2. CDBG Reagan Street Improvements - Specifications

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS

CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR

CDBG STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON REAGAN STREET
CIP # 25/26-06

IN THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA
MAY 2026
NOTICE TO THE BIDDERS:

1. Bids will be received electronically through BidNet Direct (http://cityoflosalamitos.org/517/Bid-Opportunities).

2. Bid bond required 10% of bid amount to be submitted to the Development Services Department.

3. Bids must be received by 11:00 a.m. on May 14, 2026

This page is intentionally left blank.

CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS

SPECIFICATIONS FOR

CDBG STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON REAGAN STREET
SPECIFICATION NO. CIP 25/26-06

IN THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND TECHNICAL PROVISIONS
PREPARED BY:

Willdan Engineering
2401 East Katella Avenue, Suite 300
Anaheim, CA 92806
(714) 978-8200
Camryn R. Lopez , P. E. Date
Associate Engineer

FOR THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS

PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

This page is intentionally left blank.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CDBG STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON REAGAN STREET
SPECIFICATION NO. CIP 25/26-06

IN THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA

SECTION
NOTICE INVITING ELECTRONIC BIDS ................................................................................................ A INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS .................................................................................................................B PROPOSAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS ..................................................................................C CONTRACT INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS ................................................................................ D STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ................................................................................................................ E SPECIAL PROVISIONS FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................ F

SPECIAL PROVISIONS MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION METHODS, SIGNING, STRIPING AND PAVEMENT MARKERS ........................................................................................................................... G STANDARD PLANS ................................................................................................ APPENDIX PART 1

This page is intentionally left blank.

SPC25-25
SECTION A Page 1

NOTICE INVITING BID

SECTION A

CDBG STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON REAGAN STREET
SPECIFICATION NO. CIP 25/26-06

IN THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA

NOTICE INVITING ELECTRONIC BIDS

SPC25-25
SECTION A Page 2

NOTICE INVITING BID
This page is intentionally left blank.

SPC25-25
SECTION A Page 3

NOTICE INVITING BID

NOTICE INVITING ELECTRONIC BIDS

CDBG STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON REAGAN STREET
SPECIFICATION NO. CIP 25/26-06

IN THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Los Alamitos as AGENCY, invites electronic bids for the above stated project and will receive such bids electronically through BidNet Direct (http://cityoflosalamitos.org/517/Bid-Opportunities). Bids will be received up to the hour of 11:00 a.m., on Thursday, May 14, 2026, and will be posted on Bid Net at that time.

The City of Los Alamitos proposes to grind and overlay various residential streets throughout the City as part of th
gutter and lifted sidewalk to correct drainage. ADA curb ramps will be modified to current codes as necessary for accessibility. The project includes the following street:

Reagan St from Farquhar Ave to Katella Ave
Bids must be prepared on the approved bid forms in conformance with INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS webpage at http://cityoflosalamitos.org/517/Bid-Opportunities where each prospective bidder must first No hard copy bid packages will be accepted.

Plans, and specifications will be available for review on BidNet. All relevant materials shall be obtained from the link above. The Agency is not responsible for and accepts no liability in the event a response is late due to any network, internet or any other technical problem or interruption. The bidder is solely have been transmitted successfully and have been issued an e-bid confirmation number. Bidders experiencing any technical difficulties with the bid submission process may contact BidNet at (800)835- 4603.

In accordance with the provisions of California Public Contract Code § 3300, and Business and Professions Code § 7028.15(e), the Agency has determined that the contractor shall possess a valid Class -responsive and shall bar award of the contract to any bidder not possessing the specified license at the time of the award.

CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE LICENSED AND REGULATED BY THE

CONTRACTOR MAY BE REFERRED TO THE REGISTRAR, CONTRACTORS LICENSE BOARD, P.O. BOX 2600, SACRAMENTO, CA 95826. At the time the contract is awarded, the contractor shall be properly licensed in accordance with the laws of this state. The first payment for work or material shall not be made unless and until the Registrar of Contractors verifies to properly licensed at the time the contract was awarded. Any bidder or contractor not so licensed shall be subject to all legal penalties imposed by law including, but not limited to, any appropriate disciplinary an award of a contract shall constitute a failure to execute the contract and shall result in the forfeiture of the security of the bidder. (Public Contract Code § 20103.5)

SPC25-25
SECTION A Page 4

NOTICE INVITING BID
REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS. In accordance with Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, no contractor or subcontractor shall be qualified to bid on, be listed in a bid proposal, or engage in the performance of any contract for public work, unless currently registered with the Department of Industrial Relations.

THE BID MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A BID GUARANTEE IN THE AMOUNT OF 10% OF

THE TOTAL BID PRIOR TO THE BID SUBMISSION DEADLINE, SUBMITTED TO THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT, ATTN: FINANCE MANAGER, 3191 KATELLA AVENUE, LOS ALAMITOS, CA 90720. Sealed envelopes bearing the bid bond should be clearly marked with the project title and CIP number as shown on the cover sheet of these specifications. More specifically, pursuant to Public Contract Code §§ 20170 and 20171, all bids for the project shall be presented, under sealed cover and shall be accompa
(c) a certified check made payable to the City of Los Alamitos; or (d) a bidder by an admitted surety insurer made payable to the City of Los Alamitos. Such security shall be forfeited should the successful bidder to whom the contract is awarded fails to timely execute the contract and to deliver the necessary bonds and insurance certificates as specified in the contract documents.

To the extent applicable, at any time during the term of the Agreement for the proposed project, the successful bidder may, at its own expense, substitute securities equivalent to the amount withheld as retention (or the retained percentage) in accordance with Public Contract Code § 22300.

Pursuant to California Civil Code § 3247, a payment bond is required to be submitted for all projects estimated in excess of $25,000.00.

PRE-BID MEETING: A voluntary pre-bid meeting will be held at 11:00 a.m., on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, virtually to discuss prevailing wage requirements. All potential bidders are highly recommended to attend this meeting. If you would like to attend, it will be accessible through Microsoft Teams Meeting:

Click here to join the meeting
Meeting ID: 237 321 316 879 47
Passcode: gD2sb6LE
PREVAILING WAGE REQUIREMENTS: This is a federally assisted construction contract. Federal labor standards provisions outlined in the HUD-4010 form, including the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA), will be enforced. The applicable Federal wage decision is the one in effect ten (10) days prior to bid opening; it is included in these specifications and is available online at https://sam.gov/content/wage-determinations. In the event of a conflict between the Federal and State wage rates, the higher of the two will prevail. The State wage rates are available online at http://www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/PWD/index.htm. Lower State wage rates for work classifications not specifically included in the Federal wage decision are not acceptable.

APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM: Attention is directed to Sections 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1777.7 of the California Labor Code and Title 8 of the California Administrative Code, Section 200, et seq., to ensure compliance and complete understanding of the law regarding apprentices.

The Agency reserves the right to reject any and all bids.

SPC25-25
SECTION A Page 5

NOTICE INVITING BID
Questions or Requests for Information (RFIs) or interpretations are due May 4, 2026, at 11:00 a.m., ten (10) days before the time announced for the opening of the bids and shall be submitted on the BidNet portal.

BY ORDER OF the City Council of the City of Los Alamitos, California.

SPC25-25 B-1

SECTION B

CDBG STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON REAGAN STREET
SPECIFICATION NO. CIP 25/26-06

IN THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

SPC25-25 B-2

INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

CDBG STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON REAGAN STREET
SPECIFICATION NO. CIP 25/26-06

IN THE CITY OF LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA
B1.01 INSPECTION OF SITE OF WORK
Bidders are required to inspect the site of the work in order to satisfy themselves, by personal examination or by such other means as they may prefer, of the location of the proposed work and as to the actual conditions of and at the site of work. If, during the course of his/her examination, a bidder finds facts or conditions which appear to him/her to conflict with the letter or spirit of the contract documents, or with any other data furnished him/her, he/she may apply to the Agency in writing in accordance with B1.04 INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS for additional information and explanation before submitting his/her bid.

The submission of a proposal by the bidder shall constitute the acknowledgment that, if awarded the contract, he/she has relied and is relying on his/her own examination of (a) the site of the work, (b) the access to the site, and (c) all other data, matters, and things requisite to the fulfillment of the work and on his/her own knowledge of existing services and utilities on and in the vicinity of the site of the work to be constructed under the contract, and not on any representation or warranty of the Agency. No claim for additional compensation will be allowed which is based upon a lack of knowledge of these items.

B1.02 EXAMINATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Each bidder shall thoroughly examine and be familiar with legal and procedural documents, general conditions, specifications, drawings and addenda (if any). The submission of a proposal shall constitute an acknowledgment upon which the Agency may rely that the bidder has thoroughly examined and is familiar with the contract document
or neglect of a bidder to receive or examine any of the contract documents shall in no way relieve him/her from any obligations with respect to his/her proposal or to the contract. No claim for additional compensation will be allowed which is based upon a lack of knowledge of any contract document.

B1.03 CONTRACT PERIOD/CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION DATE
set forth in SECTION E, STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, particularly those pertaining to the contract period and liquidated damages for avoidable delays.

The Contractor shall commence the Project after the date of the Notice to Proceed with Procurement. Subsequent to the receipt of the equipment, Contractor shall diligently proceed said work to completion before the expiration 20 WORKING DAYS. The Contractor shall pay to the Agency the sum of $1,400.00 per day, for each and every B1.04 INTERPRETATION OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS
No oral interpretations will be made to any bidder as to the meaning of the contract documents. Requests for an interpretation shall be made in writing and delivered to the Agency at least ten (10) days before the time announced for opening the proposals. Interpretations by the Agency will be in the form of addenda to the contract documents and, when issued, will be sent as promptly as is practical to all parties to whom the contract documents have been issued. Agency makes no guarantee that all bidders will receive all addenda. Copies of addenda will be made available for inspection at the office where contract documents are on file for inspection as indicated on the Invitation for Bids. All such addenda shall become part of the contract. All questions shall be addressed to Chris Kelley, City of Los Alamitos, (562) 357-5411.

B1.05 SOIL INFORMATION Soil reports have not been prepared for this project.

SPC25-25 B-3
B1.06 PROPOSAL
Proposals shall be made on the forms enclosed in SECTION C of these specifications with or without removal from the bound contract documents. All proposals shall give the prices proposed, both in words and in numbers, shall give all other information requested herein, and shall be signed by the bidder or his/her authorized representative, with his/her address. If the proposal is made by an individual, his/her name, signature and mailing address must be shown; if made by firm or partnership, the name and mailing address of the firm or partnership and the signature of at least one of the general partners must be shown; if made by a corporation, the proposal shall show the name of the state under the laws of which the corporation is chartered, the name and mailing address of the corporation, and the name and title of the person who signs on behalf of the corporation. If the proposal is made by a corporation, a certified copy of the bylaws or resolution of the board of directors of the corporation shall be furnished demonstrating the authority of the officer signing the proposal to execute contracts on behalf of the corporation.

Each proposal shall be submitted as specified in SECTION A - NOTICE INVITING ELECTRONIC BIDS. Bidders are warned against making erasures or alterations of any kind, and proposals which contain omissions, erasures or irregularities of any kind may be rejected. No oral, telegraphic or telephonic proposals or modifications will be considered.

In conformance with the Business and Profession Code, § 7028.15, the Contractor must state clearly his/her license number and expiration date. In addition he/she shall sign a statement that these representations were made under the penalty of perjury. This statement shall be made on the EXPERIENCE STATEMENT in SECTION C. The contractor will be required to pay prevailing wage pursuant to California Law, including California Labor Code §§ 1770 et seq. Copies of the prevailing rate of per diem wages are on file at the offices of the Agency.

B1.07 ADDENDA
Each proposal shall include specific acknowledgment in the space provided on SECTION C - BID PROPOSAL of receipt of all addenda issued during the bidding period. Failure to so acknowledge may result in the proposal being rejected as not responsive.

B1.08 BID PRICES
Bid prices shall include everything necessary for the completion of construction and fulfillment of the contract including, but not limited to, furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, plant and other facilities and all management, superintendence, labor and services, except as may be provided otherwise in the contract documents. In the event of a difference between a price quoted in words and a price quoted in numbers for the same quotation, the words shall be the amount bid.

In preparing bid prices, bidder represents that he/she has carefully examined the Contract Documents and the site where the work is to be performed and that he/she has familiarized himself with all local conditions and federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations that may affect the performance of the work in any manner.

The bidder further represents that he/she has studied all surveys and investigation reports about subsurface and physical conditions pertaining to the job site, that he/she has performed such additional surveys and investigations as he/she deems necessary to complete the work at his/her bid price, and that he/she has correlated the results of all such data with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The submittal of a bid shall be conclusive evidence that the bidder has investigated and is satisfied as to the conditions to be encountered, including locality, uncertainty of weather and all other contingencies, and as to the character, quality, quantities, and scope of the work.

The plans and specifications for the work show subsurface conditions or otherwise hidden conditions as the Design Engineer supposes or believes them to exist, but is not intended or to be inferred that the conditions as shown thereon constitute a representation that such conditions are actually existent. Except as otherwise specifically provided in the Contract Documents, the Agency, the Design Engineer and their consultants or agents

SPC25-25 B-4
shall not be liable for any loss sustained by the Contractor as a result of any variance of such conditions as shown on the plans and the actual conditions revealed during the progress of the work or otherwise.

The Contractor shall perform an independent take-off of the plans and bid accordingly. Quantities listed in the BID SCHEDULE in SECTION C are intended only as a guide for the Contractor as to the anticipated order of magnitude of work. Contractor shall be responsible for verifying all estimated quantities. Contractor will be reimbursed for the quantity of items actually installed as required by the Contract Documents and shown on the plans to neat line and grade.

The Contractor will not be reimbursed for unauthorized work performed outside of that required by the Contract Documents.

B1.09 TAXES
No mention shall be made in the proposal of sales tax, use tax, or any other tax, as all amounts bid will be deemed and held to include any such taxes which may be applicable.

B1.10 RECOGNITION OF BONDING COMPANIES
All bonding companies used by the Contractor in this contract must be recognized by the Federal Government within Circular 570. All proposals or contracts received that include bonds posted by bonding companies not recognized in Circular 570 will result in the disqualification of the bid proposal and forfeiture of the bid bond.

B1.11 QUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS
Each bidder shall be skilled and regularly engaged in the general class or type of work called for under the contract. A statement setting forth his/her experience shall be submitted by each bidder on the EXPERIENCE STATEMENT form provided in SECTION C. his/her bid is submitted. The class of license shall be applicable to the work specified in the contract. Each bidder shall also have no less than five (5) years experience in the magnitude and character of the work bid.

It is the intention of the Agency to award a contract to a bidder who furnished satisfactory evidence that he/she has the requisite experience and ability, and that he/she has sufficient capital, facilities, and plant to enable him/her to prosecute the work successfully and properly, and to complete it within the time stated in the contract.

To determine the degree of responsibility to be credited to the bidder, the Agency will weigh any evidence that the bidder has performed satisfactorily other contracts of like nature, magnitude and comparable difficulty and comparable rates of progress. If in the opinion of the Agency, a bidder is determined to be insufficiently qualified, then that bidder will not be considered for award of the contract.

B1.12 DESIGNATION OF SUPPLIERS AND SUBCONTRACTORS
Each proposal shall have listed on the DESIGNATION OF SUPPLIERS AND SUBCONTRACTORS form provided in SECTION C the name and address of each subcontractor to whom the bidder proposes to sublet portions of the work in excess of one-half percent of the total amount of his/her bid. For the purpose of this paragraph, a subcontractor is defined as one who contracts with the Contractor to furnish materials and labor, or labor only for the performance of work at the site of the work or who will specially fabricate a portion of the work off the site pursuant to detailed drawings in the contract documents.

Public Contract Code § 4104 requires all bidders to list subcontractors who will perform work in excess of ½% of the total bid, or in the case of streets and highways, ½% or $10,000, whichever is greater.

Public Contract Code § 6109 prohibits a contractor from performing work with a subcontractor who is debarred pursuant to Labor Code §§ 1777.1 or 1777.7.

SPC25-25 B-5
B1.13 PROPOSAL GUARANTEE
The proposal shall be accompanied by a proposal guarantee bond duly completed on the form provided herewith by a guarantee company authorized to carry on business in the State of California for payments to the Agency in the sum of at least 10% of the total amount of the bid proposal, or alternatively by a certif payable to the Agency, or cash, in the sum of at least 10% of the total amount of the bid proposal. The amount payable to the Agency under the proposal guarantee shall be forfeited to the Agency in case of failure or neglect of the bidder to furnish, execute and deliver to the Agency the required bonds, evidence of insurance and to enter into, execute and deliver to the Agency the agreement on the form provided herewith, within ten (10) days after being notified in writing by the Agency that the award has been made and the agreement is ready for execution.

B1.14 MODIFICATION OF PROPOSAL
A modification of a bid proposal already received will be considered only if the modification is received before the time announced for the opening of bids. All modifications shall be made in writing, executed and submitted in the same form and manner as the original bid proposal.

B1.15 WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSAL
A proposal may be withdrawn by a written request signed by the bidder. Such requests must be delivered to the

SECTION A NOTICE INVITING
ELECTRONIC BIDS. Proposals may not be withdrawn after that time without forfeiture of the proposal guarantee. The withdrawal of a proposal will not prejudice the right of the bidder to submit a new proposal, providing there is time to do so.

B1.16 POSTPONEMENT OF BID OPENING
The Agency reserves the right to postpone the date and time for opening of bids at any time prior to the date and time announced in SECTION A NOTICE INVITING ELECTRONIC BIDS. B1.17 DISQUALIFICATION OF BIDDERS If there is reason to believe that collusion exists among the bidders, none of the bids of the participants in such collusion will be considered. In the event that any bidder acting as a prime Contractor has an interest in more than one proposal, all such proposals will be rejected, and the bidder will be disqualified. This restriction does not apply to subcontractors or suppliers who may submit quotations to more than one bidder, and while doing so, may also submit a formal proposal as a prime Contractor.

B1.18 REJECTION OF PROPOSALS
The Agency reserves the right to reject any and all proposals, to waive any irregularity, and to reject any proposals which are incomplete, obscure or irregular; any proposals which omit a bid on any one or more items on which bids are required; which omit unit prices if unit prices are required; in which unit prices are unbalanced in the opinion of the Agency; which are accompanied by insufficient or irregular bid security; or which are from bidders who have previously failed to perform properly or to timely complete contracts of any nature.

B1.19 AWARD OF CONTRACT
The Contract will be awarded, if at all, to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder, whose bid proposal is not rejected for cause by the Agency. However, until an award is made, the Agency reserves right will be reserved to reject any or all bids, and to waive technical errors or discrepancies, if to do so is deemed to best serve the interests of the Agency. In no event will an award be made until all necessary investigations are made as to the responsibility and qualifications of the bidder to whom it is proposed to make such an award. s directed to the possibility that the award of the project may be delayed for various reasons. The Agency reserves the right to delay the award of the project for 45 calendar days. After 45 calendar days, the low bidder may at any time request release from its bid without penalty.

SPC25-25 B-6
The acceptance of a proposal will be evidenced by a Notice of Award of Contract in writing, delivered by mail to the bidder whose proposal is accepted. No other act of the Agency shall constitute acceptance of a proposal. The award of contract shall obligate the bidder whose proposal is accepted to furnish a performance bond, payment bond and maintenance bond, as well as evidence of insurance and to execute the contract set forth herein.

B1.20 RETURN OF PROPOSAL GUARANTEES Within ten (10) calendar days after the bids are opened, the Agency will release the proposal guarantees accompanying the proposals which are not to be considered in making the award. Proposal guarantees for the two lowest bidders will be held until the contract has been fully executed, after which they will be returned to the respective bidders.

B2.21 EXECUTION OF CONTRACT
The contract agreement shall be executed in duplicate by the successful bidder and returned, together with the contract bonds and evidence of insurance, within ten (10) calendar days after the notification of the contract award by the Agency in writing. In case of failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract agreement within ten (10) calendar days after such notice, or any subsequent extension approved by Agency, the Agency at its option may consider the bidder in default, in which case the bid bond or proposal guarantee accompanying the bid shall become the property of the Agency. After execution by the Agency, one original contract shall be returned to the Contractor.

B1.22 FLEXIBILITY OF BID SCHEDULE
It is the intent of the Agency to award a contract to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder and the flexibility shown in the bid schedule is necessary to ensure a p constraints.

SPC25-25 F-1

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS

BUILD AMERICA, BUY AMERICA (BABA) ACT
Background: The construction services performed pursuant to this contract agreement are subject to the Build America, Buy America (BABA) Act requirements under Title IX of the Infrastructure Investment and -58. Absent an approved waiver, all iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in this project must be produced in the United States, as further outlined by the -22-11, Initial Implementation Guidance on
Application of Buy America Preference in Federal Financial Assistance Programs for Infrastructure, April 18, 2022.

The BABA requirements instituted by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law of 2021 mandates a domestic preference that all iron and steel, manufactured products, and construction materials are produced in the United States. For the purposes of this contract agreement, those articles, materials, or supply other than an item of primarily iron or steel; a manufactured product; cement and cementitious materials; aggregates such as stone, sand, or gravel; or aggregate binding agents or additives that are or consist primarily of: non-ferrous metals, plastic and polymer-based products, glass, lumber or drywall. For the purposes of this contract agreem components, or otherwise made or processed from
raw materials into finished products. Manufactured products must be manufactured (assembled) in the United States, and the cost of components that were mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States must be greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components of the project.

BABA Contract Provisions: The construction services performed pursuant to this contract agreement are subject to the Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) requirements under Title IX of the Infrastructure -58. Absent an approved waiver, all iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in this project must be produced in the United States, as further -22-11, Initial Implementation
Guidance on Application of Buy America Preference in Federal Financial Assistance Programs for Infrastructure, April 18, 2022.

Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) requirements mandated by Title IX of the Infrastructure Investment a -58.

By submitting a bid, Contractor hereby certifies they are familiar with all laws and regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the work, including BABA requirements.

General Requirements:

1. . 2. By submitting a bid, Contractor acknowledges and certifies intent to comply with BABA requirements in all respects.

3. If a specific manufacturer is used in the bidding, a statement that the manufacturer will comply with BABA must be included with the bid submission.

4. conditions, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations, and BABA requirements.

5. Engineer/Architect approval of shop drawings or samples shall include review of BABA documentation.

6. The Awarding Body shall cause to review and / or take action with respect to shop drawings, samples, and other required Contractor submittals, including applications for payment, to ensure compliance with BABA.

7. Installation of materials or products that are not compliant with BABA requirements shall be considered defective work. Contractor should ensure that Engineer/Architect has an approved n or waiver prior to items being delivered to the project site.

8. For any change orders, Contractor shall provide BABA documentation for any new products or materials required by the change.

SPC25-25 F-2

9. By submitting an application for payment, based in whole or in part on furnishing equipment compliant with BABA requirements.

10. Contractor shall comply with BABA requirements, including coordination with manufacturers, distributors, and suppliers to correct deficiencies in any BABA documentation.

11. th BABA requirements
the items provided by manufacturer meet the domestic preference requirements of BABA. The Awarding Body shall maintain copies of certifications in project files.

12. Subsequent to completion of the project and prior to release of retention funds, Contractor shall supply certifications of comp
iron and steel products, manufactured products, and construction materials referenced in any technical analysis/report; the plans, specifications, and bidding documents; any bid addenda; and change orders complied with all federal requirements, including BABA. The Awarding Body shall maintain copies of certifications in project files.

13. Contractor shall assist the Awarding Body / Owner, if needed, in due diligence related to any BABA waiver request.

Definitions: Terms not defined in this part shall have the same meaning as provided in 2 CFR part 200, subpart A.

Awarding Body means the entity awarding a construction contract agreement to be paid in whole or in part with federal financial assistance subject to BABA.

Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) means division G, title IX, subtitle A, part I, sections 70901 through 70927 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 117-58).

Buy America Preference
70914 of the Build America, Buy America Act, which requires the head of each Federal agency to ensure that none of the funds made available for a Federal award for an infrastructure project may be obligated unless all of the iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States.

Construction materials means articles, materials, or supplies incorporated into an infrastructure project that consist of only one or more of the following materials, except as provided in paragraph (2) of this definition:
(1)
(i) Non-ferrous metals;
(ii) Plastic and polymer-based products (including polyvinylchloride, composite building materials, and polymers used in fiber optic cables);
(iii) Glass (including optic glass);
(iv) Fiber optic cable;
(v) Optical fiber;
(vi) Lumber; or
(vii) Drywall.
(2) For an item that consists only of a combination of one or more of the construction materials listed in paragraph (1) of this definition and binding agents, any binding agents shall be disregarded, and each construction material must meet the Buy America Preference standard Domestic content procurement preference means a requirement that no amounts made available through a program for Federal financial assistance may be obligated for a project unless (A) all iron and steel used in the project are produced in the United States; (B) the manufactured products used in the project are produced in the United States; or (C) the construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States.

Federal agency
of title 44, United States Code), other than an independent regulatory agency (as defined in that section).

Federal financial assistance
(A)
200.1 of title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor regulations). (B) Inclus
agency to a non-Federal entity for an infrastructure project, except that it does not include expenditures for assistance authorized under section 402, 403, 404, 406, 408, or 502 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170a, 5170b, 5170c, 5172, 5174, or 5192) relating to a major disaster or emergency declared by the President

SPC25-25 F-3
under section 401 or 501, respectively, of such Act (42 U.S.C. 5170, 5191) or pre and post disaster or emergency response expenditures.

Financial Assistance Recipients are also known as grantees. Entities (states, counties, cities, and tribes) that receive funds through financial assistance awards under CDBG are financial assistance recipients.

Infrastructure includes, at a minimum, the structures, facilities, and equipment for, in the United States (A) roads, highways, and bridges;
(B) public transportation;
(C) dams, ports, harbors, and other maritime facilities; (D) intercity passenger and freight railroads;
(E) freight and intermodal facilities;
(F) airports;
(G) water systems, including drinking water and wastewater systems; (H) electrical transmission facilities and systems;
(I) utilities;
(J) broadband infrastructure; and
(K) buildings and real property.

Infrastructure project is any activity related to the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of infrastructure in the United States regardless of whether infrastructure is the primary purpose of the project.

Iron or steel products means articles, materials, or supplies incorporated into an infrastructure project that consist wholly or predominantly of iron, steel, or both.

Manufactured products means articles, materials, or supplies incorporated into an infrastructure project that:
(1) Do not consist wholly or predominantly of iron or steel or both; and (2) Are not categorized as a construction material (as defined in this section).

Produced in the United States means the following, for:
(1) Iron and steel products. All manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. (2) Manufactured products.
(i) The product was manufactured in the United States; and (ii) The cost of the components of the manufactured product that are mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States is greater than 55 percent of the total cost of all components of the manufactured product, unless another standard for determining the minimum amount of domestic content of the manufactured product has been established under applicable law or regulation. The costs of components of a manufactured product ar
(3) Construction materials. All manufacturing processes for the construction material occurred in for specific construction materials.

Project means the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of infrastructure in the United States.

Subgrantee and Subrecipient means a non-Federal entity that expends Federal awards received from a pass-through entity to carry out a Federal program but does not include an individual that is a beneficiary of such a program. A subrecipient may also be a recipient of other Federal awards directly from a Federal awarding agency.

Subcontractor and or Vendor means a dealer, distributor, merchant, or other seller providing goods or services procured for the conduct of a Federal program. These goods or services may be procured directly by the federal government or by a financial assistance recipient expending federal dollars to execute a federal program.