Los Altos Hills City Council
January 15, 2026

City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

1. Eric Bredo, a Los Altos Hills resident, spoke about speeding and reckless driving on Page Mill Road, noting that he is familiar with the roadway and its hazards from personal experience. He expressed concern about high-speed vehicles and motorcycles traveling well above safe speeds, stating that such behavior poses a serious safety risk to drivers, pedestrians, and others using the road.

2. Page Alloo, a Los Altos Hills resident, spoke about ongoing speeding issues on Elena Road and other narrow local streets, describing safety concerns for pedestrians, bicyclists, children, and animals. She shared personal experiences with aggressive driving and emphasized that lack of enforcement contributes to continued speeding, urging the Town to focus enforcement efforts on the most dangerous, high-speed violators rather than minor speed infractions.

3. John O’Connell, a Los Altos Hills resident, spoke in support of prior speakers regarding latenight and early-morning speeding, noting that high-performance vehicles can be heard traveling at excessive speeds on local roads. He suggested exploring low-cost technological solutions used in the UK and Europe to identify speeding vehicles, and recommended that the Technology Committee evaluate such options as a potential deterrent, even if not used for issuing citations under current California law.

4. Sarita Skidmore, a Los Altos Hills resident, spoke about persistent speeding in her neighborhood and described multiple incidents in which vehicles have entered her property, causing damage. She expressed concern for the safety of residents, children, and bicyclists, and urged increased enforcement, including ticketing and sheriff presence, to address the ongoing traffic safety issues.

5. Geoff Skidmore, a Los Altos Hills resident, described daily safety concerns related to speeding, noting the difficulty and stress of crossing the road near a curve to retrieve his mail.

He referenced a prior incident in which a speeding vehicle crashed into a utility pole near his property and expressed concern that continued speeding could result in serious injury or loss of life, encouraging the Town to explore technological enforcement tools as a potentially more effective alternative to full-time police enforcement.

6. Mei Huang, a Los Altos Hills resident, described repeated incidents in which vehicles have crashed into her property, causing significant damage, including two separate fence impacts in recent years. She expressed fear for pedestrian safety due to speeding, lack of sidewalks, and aggressive driving, and urged the Town to prioritize safety over cost considerations and take concrete action to address traffic conditions in her neighborhood.

7. Will Hermann, a Los Altos Hills resident, commented on the traffic speed data presented, noting that the graphs reflect aggregated data over a week-long period and may therefore overstate the frequency of extreme speeding events. He stated that Los Altos Hills generally has a low rate of crashes and injuries and suggested that the most excessive speeding may be limited to a small number of drivers.

8. Jim Waschura, a Los Altos Hills resident, commented on the interpretation of the traffic speed data, cautioning against relying on maximum speed figures and emphasizing the importance of the 85th percentile as a more meaningful metric. He supported targeted solutions for chronic speeding areas near Foothill College and advocated for lower-cost measures such as speed

City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025
feedback signs, camera-based warnings, and public education, rather than extensive expenditures on police enforcement.

9. Sue Welch, a Los Altos Hills resident, expressed support for exploring technological devices to address speeding and recommended that the Technology Committee evaluate such options. She also cautioned that some extreme speeding may be intentional and recreational in nature, noting that data or tracking tools could unintentionally encourage risky behavior if not implemented carefully.

10. Kjell Karlsson, a Los Altos Hills resident, recalled the Town’s prior multi-year experiment with a full-time traffic deputy, stating that it resulted in high cost without a measurable reduction in accidents or speeding. He emphasized that past traffic safety efforts such as guardrails and mailbox relocations were more effective and urged the Council to review historical data and clearly communicate with residents before reallocating law enforcement resources away from burglary prevention toward traffic enforcement.

11. Anand Ranganathan, a Los Altos Hills resident, reiterated comments made at a prior meeting, emphasizing that traffic data should be evaluated using the 85th percentile rather than maximum speed figures, which may reflect isolated incidents. He stated that the available data does not indicate a widespread speeding problem and suggested that, if funds are to be spent, the Town should prioritize roadway design improvements at known problem locations rather than costly enforcement measures.

12. Nick Cline, a Los Altos Hills resident, stated that his personal experience aligns with the traffic data presented and that speeding occurs frequently on Elena and nearby streets, creating serious safety concerns for pedestrians and residents. He cited property damage, injury to pets, and near-miss incidents, and urged the Council to take action to address what he described as an ongoing public safety issue, including increased enforcement as part of a broader solution.

13. Cheryl Evans, a Los Altos Hills resident, echoed concerns regarding traffic safety on Elena Road near Foothill College, noting that vehicles frequently fail to stop at the intersection. She identified the area as a recurring problem location and expressed support for addressing the safety issues raised by other speakers.

14. Vivian Lee, a Los Altos Hills resident, spoke about frequent speeding and aggressive driving on Elena Road near Foothill College based on her and her neighbors’ daily experiences, including repeated property damage and unsafe conditions for pedestrians. She cautioned against minimizing the issue based solely on selective data analysis and urged the Council to consider residents' lived experiences and take the safety concerns seriously.

The City Council directed staff to work with the Sheriff’s Office to increase traffic enforcement through January 15, 2026, and to report back at the January Council meeting on the results. Staff was also directed to refer the issue to the Technology Committee to evaluate potential trafficcalming solutions, including stop signs and other measures. Additionally, staff should continue developing the Town-wide traffic safety plan scheduled for next year, with a focus on problem areas such as Elena Road.

6. PUBLIC HEARING

City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025
A. Consideration of a Resolution Making Findings and Approving an Amendment to the General Plan 2023-2031 Housing Element with an Effective Date Contingent on Formal Certification by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (Staff: J. Bradford) CEQA Review: Consideration of Exemption Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.085 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3).

Council Member Stanley Mok abstained from this item and left the dais.

Community Development Director Jay Bradford presented the Housing Element Amendment (HEA) and recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and adopt the amendment, with the adoption becoming effective upon certification by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). He provided background on the year-long process to refine the Housing Element in response to community input, Planning Commission direction, HCD comments, feasibility analysis, and property owner engagement.

The amendment clarifies maximum densities of 24 units per acre on all multi-family rezoning sites, identifies 19 acres for rezoning across Twin Oaks, St. Nicholas, and Foothill College, incorporates demonstrated property owner interest, and reflects market feasibility for both market-rate and affordable housing. The Planning Commission reviewed the amendment and recommended approval on December 4, 2025.

Director Bradford summarized public comments received, primarily from Brian O’Neill on behalf of the Twin Oaks property owner and from CalHDF, and staff’s responses. He noted that the Town has complied with procedural requirements for Housing Element amendments, that the feasibility study supports development potential on all three sites, that property owner interest is documented, and that the proposed overlay zones are consistent with state law and the Redondo Beach decision. He clarified that claims of bad faith or insufficient AFFH compliance are unfounded and that the HEA maintains the Town’s certified housing strategy without increasing reliance on accessory dwelling units. He added that alternative site analysis, such as consideration of the Sea Landing property, can continue separately through the Council’s ad hoc process and does not prevent adoption of the HEA.

Director Bradford concluded by requesting Council consideration of the Housing Element Amendment and noted that related agenda items, including the Land Use Element Amendment and the Multi-Family Rezoning Ordinance, do not require changes in connection with this action. Adoption of the HEA will only take effect upon State certification.

Consultant Dan Wery presented an overview of the proposed Housing Element Amendment (HEA). He explained that the purpose of the amendment is to adopt clarifications regarding permissible units, ensure consistency with the Zoning and Land Use Elements, and address comments received from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). He summarized the key components of the amendment, including the Planning Commission’s recommendation, confirmation of the Town’s commitment to rezone for 377 multifamily units, and clarification of maximum densities, site boundaries, and rezoning parameters for Twin Oaks, St. Nicholas, and Foothill College.

Mr. Wery outlined the procedural steps taken since the last Council review, noting prior Planning Commission review, submittal of the draft to HCD for the 60-day review, receipt of HCD’s October 10 comment letter, and follow-up meetings with HCD on October 22 and

City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025
November 14. He highlighted three main issues raised by HCD, including the reduction in allowable density from 30 to 24 units per acre, whether property owners remain interested in redevelopment, and the financial feasibility of development on all non-vacant sites. He reported that all three property owners continue to express interest and that the feasibility study confirms that market-rate and below-market-rate housing remain viable at 24 du/ac.

He also summarized public comments received between December 2 and December 9 and noted that responses to those comments were included in the supplemental agenda materials.

He concluded the presentation by reviewing the required Council actions, which include conducting the public hearing, determining that the amendment is exempt from CEQA under the common sense exemption, and considering adoption of the Housing Element Amendment with an effective date contingent upon HCD certification.

PUBLIC COMMENTS:

1. Christina Waling, President of Foothill College, addressed the Council regarding correspondence received from the California Housing Defense Fund CalHDF which was included in Supplemental Item 4A of the meeting packet. She stated that Foothill College met independently with its legal counsel earlier that day and that counsel confirmed the legal analysis previously provided by Redwood Public Law. Dr. Whalen explained that the assertion in the CalHDF letter that Foothill College would be severely restricted in its ability to fulfill its instructional mission was determined to be inaccurate. She further stated that Foothill College remains sincerely interested in being part of broader solutions to housing affordability, noting that the College has purchased housing units in Cupertino, Mountain View, and Palo Alto; however, demand for faculty and staff housing significantly exceeds the limited number of units available. She requested that Foothill College’s continued interest in collaborative housing solutions be entered into the record and thanked the Town for its partnership.

2. John O’Connell, a Los Altos Hills resident, expressed support for the resolution to adopt the amended Housing Element and to complete the required rezonings by January 31, 2026, stating that many residents support meeting the statutory deadline. He disputed claims that the Town is avoiding multifamily or affordable housing and noted that projected housing yields under current density bonus law would address only a portion of the Town’s remaining lower income RHNA obligations. He concluded by noting interest among residents in forming a committee to help guide implementation following January 31, 2026.

3. Anne Paulson, addressed the feasibility study, stating that the Town’s municipal code includes garages in gross floor area and asserted that this reduces the effective livable space of proposed units, making the projected rental assumptions unrealistic. She further stated that, based on the Town’s own calculations for the Twin Oaks site, buildable land would be limited to approximately 2.5 acres, resulting in densities significantly higher than typical townhouse developments, and concluded that a different feasibility study using an alternative development prototype would be necessary to demonstrate financial feasibility.

4. Sasha Zbrozek, a Los Altos Hills resident, commented on the statement from Foothill College, expressing appreciation for the College’s support of housing efforts while noting that the statement did not indicate an intent to construct housing within Los Altos Hills. He cautioned against characterizing the statement as a commitment to build housing in the Town and urged accuracy in representations made to the State.

City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025

5. Brian O’Neil, representing the owners of the Twin Oaks site, stated that the owners disagree with the Town’s conclusion that development of Lots 4 through 6 is financially feasible and asserted that the Town’s analysis contains significant flaws. He stated that the owners have no intention of developing only those lots and have not proposed any project consistent with the proposed amendment, noting that no development partners have been willing to pursue such a limited project. Mr. O’Neill further stated that the owners offered to substitute the adjacent Sea Landing property as a housing site but, if the Town proceeds with the amendment, the owners will seek approval of a 334 unit project on Lots 1 through 6 consistent with the existing Housing Element, and requested that the Council direct staff to process the pending application and associated approvals.

6. Cheryl Evans, a Los Altos Hills resident, thanked Town staff for their work on the Housing Element modifications and expressed support for providing lower cost housing in a manner that remains welcoming while preserving the character of Los Altos Hills. She encouraged the Council to establish a formal working group consisting of residents, staff, and Council members to allow for broader collaboration and idea sharing beyond the public comment time limits.

Assistant City Attorney Claire Lai provided additional clarification regarding public comments from CalHDF and Brian O’Neill. In response to the CalHDF comments, she explained that the Town’s proposed Multi-Family (MF) Overlay Zones are consistent with state law and the Redondo Beach decision. The overlay zones provide the required minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre, supersede the underlying R-A zoning uses within their boundaries, and include a 50 percent residential requirement for conditional uses. She noted that the proposed overlay zones differ from the Redondo Beach decision because they do not allow non-residential uses within the district boundaries, whereas the Redondo Beach overlay would have permitted non-residential uses, resulting in the potential for no housing development. She clarified that the MF Overlay Zones do not prevent Foothill or St. Nicholas from expanding or altering existing facilities and do not render any existing uses nonconforming. The overlay zones apply only to vacant properties without current institutional facilities, and while the R-A district uses would be superseded within the overlay boundaries, the remainder of the sites will continue to allow R-A uses. School uses are already conditional uses under current zoning and would remain so under the MF zoning ordinance. Expansion or alteration of existing facilities, or construction of new ones outside the overlay areas, will continue to follow the R-A regulations and processes. She stated that the comments mischaracterize the rezoning proposal and its implications. She also confirmed that the Community Development Director discussed these overlay implications with Foothill and St. Nicholas during conversations about the proposed rezoning, and that suggestions the schools were not informed or that the Town acted in bad faith are incorrect.

Addressing additional comments regarding rezoning generally, she noted that these issues were raised in another letter about the housing element amendment, consistent with prior correspondence responded to in Supplement 1 for Item 6A. One new assertion claimed that the floating overlay zone is not a true rezoning because it requires future legislative action. Claire clarified that the floating MF Overlay Zone is a rezoning action because it establishes a zoning district permitting multi-family housing and related development standards. While the boundaries will be mapped at a later date, that mapping is an adjudicative act, not a legislative one. Therefore, adoption of the floating overlay zone constitutes rezoning.

In response to comments from Brian O’Neill, Claire stated that comments about the Feasibility Study assumptions were addressed in Attachment 4 to Item 6A, and that staff continues to conclude the feasibility findings are appropriate. She noted that these comments should be

City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025
considered in the context of a series of submittals in which the property owner has repeatedly offered varying levels of development interest to the Town. Although the Twin Oaks project applications are not on the agenda, she explained that the property owner submitted preliminary applications that the Town determined to be incomplete under Government Code section 65941.1, meaning they are not considered submitted. The applicant has not corrected the deficiencies. She added that AB 130, which establishes a new infill exemption for qualifying housing developments, requires the Town to request tribal consultation within 14 days only after an applicant notifies the Town that a project is eligible for an exemption and has submitted a complete preliminary application. Because the applicant’s preliminary applications are incomplete and not deemed submitted, the tribal consultation requirements have not been triggered.

Council Member Tyson made a motion to approve the Resolution Making Findings and Approving an Amendment to the General Plan 2023-2031 Housing Element with an Effective Date Contingent on Formal Certification by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. Council Member Swan seconded the motion. APPROVED, VOTE 4-0-1
MOTION PASSED: 4-0-1
AYES: Tankha, Bhateja, Swan, Tyson
NOES: None
RECUSE: None
ABSTAIN: Mok
ABSENT: None

7. NEW BUSINESS
A. Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Roger’s Electric to Upgrade the Security Cameras at Town Hall and Accepting the Donation of Camera Hardware.

Management Analyst Joram Particulo presented a staff report recommending approval of a contract to upgrade the Town Hall security camera system as the first phase of a broader, multi-year effort to modernize and integrate security systems across Town facilities. He explained that the existing camera systems are outdated, fragmented, and no longer meet modern security, data retention, or compliance standards, limiting the Town’s ability to effectively monitor facilities and ensure public and employee safety.

Mr. Particulo described the goal of transitioning toward a unified security platform that integrates cameras, access control, and alarm systems under a single vendor to improve efficiency, reduce long-term maintenance costs, and enhance system reliability. He outlined the collaborative process involving staff and the Technology Committee, including vendor evaluations and cost comparisons, which led to the recommendation to use the UniFi camera platform and Roger’s Electric as the installation vendor. He also noted that the project cost was substantially reduced due to competitive pricing and the donation of camera equipment, and that the proposed action aligns with the City Council Work Plan priority of improving community safety while remaining fiscally responsible.

Vice Mayor Bhateja made a motion to approve the Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Contract with Roger’s Electric to Upgrade the Security Cameras at Town Hall and Accepting the Donation of Camera Hardware. Council Member Mok seconded the motion.

City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025
APPROVED, VOTE 5-0
B. Approval of the 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Schedule Month Meeting Date Proposed Adjustment
January January 15, 2026 No change
January January 21, 2026 Special City Council Meeting
Committee Goals
February February 4, 2026 Special City Council Meeting
Goal Setting Workshop
February February 10, 2026 Changed from February 19,
2025
March March 19, 2026 No change
April April 16, 2026 No change
May TBD Joint Council and Finance &
Investment (Budget) Meeting
May May 21, 2026 No change
June June 18, 2026 No change
July July 16, 2026 Cancel
August August 20, 2026 No change
September September 17, 2026 No change
October October 15, 2026 No change
November November 12, 2026 Changed from November 19,
2026 for the NLC Conference
December December 17, 2026 No change
Council Member Swan made a motion to approve the 2026 City Council Regular Meeting Schedule. Vice Mayor Bhateja seconded the motion. APPROVED, VOTE 5-0 C. Resolution Declaring the Town Hall Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning System Repair/Replacement Project as an Emergency and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Construction Agreement not to exceed $300,000 for the Project to be Funded from the Facilities Replacement Reserve
Public Works Director WooJae Kim presented a staff report recommending that the City Council declare the Town Hall Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning repair and replacement project an emergency due to the failure of multiple original HVAC systems serving public and staff areas of Town Hall. He explained that the loss of heating and cooling impacts critical spaces, including public areas and offices, and that immediate action is necessary to ensure safe and functional conditions for Town operations and public use.

Mr. Kim outlined that declaring the project an emergency would allow the Town to proceed without the delays associated with a formal competitive bidding process, which could postpone repairs for several months. He further explained that staff are continuing to evaluate repair and replacement options, obtain quotes, and assess cost-effective and energy-efficient solutions, and recommended authorizing the City Manager to execute a construction agreement not to exceed $300,000 using the Facilities Replacement Reserve, with ongoing reporting to the Council as required under state law.

Vice Mayor Bhateja moved to approve the Resolution that finds sufficient evidence exists to declare the Town Hall HVAC Repair and Replacement Project an emergency in order to prevent

City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025
delays to the work, and to authorize the City Manager to solicit quotes and execute a construction agreement not to exceed $180,000 to repair and replace the failed Town Hall HVAC system for Zone 1, to be funded from the Facilities Replacement Reserve. He further moved that, if the cost to repair the gas/electric rooftop unit for Zone 2 is significant, at approximately over $10,000, the City Manager be authorized to solicit quotes and execute a construction agreement not to exceed $300,000 to repair and replace the HVAC system for Zones 1 and 2, also to be funded from the Facilities Replacement Reserve. Council Member Swan seconded the motion. APPROVED, VOTE 5-0.

MOTION PASSED: 5-0
AYES: Tankha, Bhateja, Mok, Swan, Tyson
NOES: None
RECUSE: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

8. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES, SUBCOMMITTEES, AND COUNCILMEMBERS

ON OUTSIDE AGENCIES
Council Member Swan reported that 2026 marks the nation’s 250th anniversary and suggested the Town consider whether it wishes to commemorate the milestone, noting that activities were held during the bicentennial. She stated she will speak with the History Committee about potential ideas and also mentioned a suggestion to create a 70th anniversary pin for the Town as part of next year’s historical recognitions.

Vice Mayor Bhateja reported that he attended the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors meeting, where he delivered a eulogy for former Mayor John R. Putlian. He noted that Supervisor Margaret Abe-Koga also offered touching remarks in his honor. He further shared that the Technology Committee recently hosted another cybersecurity session, which this time included information on artificial intelligence. Approximately 15 people attended in person, with additional participants on Zoom. The recording will be posted on the Town’s website and promoted in the newsletter to help raise awareness, as residents in Los Altos Hills lost more than $2 million to cyber scams in the first quarter of the year. He emphasized the growing sophistication of such scams and the importance of community education.

9. STAFF REPORTS
A. City Attorney Steve Mattas had no report.

B. City Clerk Arika Miller invited the public to attend the City Council Reorganization Meeting on Thursday, December 18, noting that Chef Chu would be participating in the event. She encouraged community members watching the meeting to join in next week’s celebration.

C. Community Development Director Jay Bradford reiterated the City Attorney’s comments regarding Plan Bay Area 2050 and the circulating Draft EIR. He stated that staff remains open to receiving public input; however, most feedback received to date has

City Council Adjourned Regular Meeting Minutes
December 9, 2025
duplicated comments already submitted by other jurisdictions, so staff has not submitted additional comments. He noted that if the Town identifies technical, Town-specific information not already in the record, staff would provide comments before the December 18 deadline. In response to a question about follow-up from the Community Development Department listening session, he explained that several related items are included in the department’s work plan and that staff will first bring the discussion to the Planning Commission, which he expects to occur in January, followed by a return to the City Council shortly thereafter.

D. Finance Director Thomas Leung had no report.

E. Public Works Director WooJae Kim Public Works Director WooJae Kim reported on the El Monte Fire Station Utility Undergrounding Rule 20A project, noting that although the project was approved as complete earlier in the meeting, one overhead Comcast line on Elena Road still needs to be cut over. All overhead lines along Moody Road have already been removed. Comcast is expected to complete the remaining cutover this week, after which AT&T will remove the poles to fully complete the project. Once this final work is finished, the Town will issue its final invoice to the utility companies for reimbursement of the remaining 10 percent of project costs. He added that staff hopes to celebrate the project’s completion once all work is finalized.

Vice Mayor Bhateja thanked the Public Works Department, including WooJae Kim and Daniel Liang, for their efforts, noting that their redesign of the Matadero Creek project eliminated the need for a second retaining wall and resulted in approximately three hundred thousand dollars in savings for the Town. He expressed appreciation for their valuable work.

F. Acting City Manager Cody Einfalt provided two updates. First, he reported that the Sheriff’s Office has transitioned to a new records management system, which has created temporary logistical issues affecting the generation of weekly activity reports. As a result, the Town will not receive Sheriff’s data for approximately two weeks, and the City Manager’s Weekly Report will reflect this gap. Second, he advised that the Town will conduct a test of its emergency notification systems, Nixle and AlertSCC, on December 13. He encouraged residents to sign up for both systems and asked Council to help spread the word so the Town can evaluate how many residents receive the test alert.

10. COUNCIL INITIATED ITEMS - None

11. ADJOURN
Mayor Tankha adjourned the meeting at 9:08 p.m.

ITEM 5G
Town of Los Altos Hills
City Council Special Meeting Minutes
Thursday, December 18, 2025, at 1:00 P.M.

Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California

Present: Mayor Kavita Tankha, Vice Mayor Rajiv Bhateja, Council Member Stanley Mok.

Council Member Linda Swan, and Council Member George Tyson

Absent: None
Staff: Acting City Manager Cody Einfalt, Community Development Director Jay Bradford, Public Works Director Jay Bradford, Finance Director Thomas Leung, and City Clerk Arika Birdsong-Miller
CALL TO ORDER (1:00 P.M.)
Mayor Tankha called the meeting to order at 1:00 P.M.

1. ROLL CALL
Mayor Kavita Tankha, Vice Mayor Rajiv Bhateja, Council Member Stanley Mok, Council Member Linda Swan, and Council Member George Tyson were present.

2. PUBLIC COMMENT (Public Comment is Limited to Items which are the Subject of the Special Meeting)
There were no public comments.

3. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING:

A. Public Employee/Public Employee Appointment
(Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957(b)(1))
Title: City Manager

4. OPEN SESSION
A. Award of a Contract for City Manager Recruitment Consultant.

Following discussion in Closed Session, the City Council, upon return to Open Session, approved the award of a contract with Ralph Anderson & Associates for City Manager recruitment services in an amount not to exceed $30,000.

Council Member Tyson made the motion to approve the award of a contract with Ralph Anderson & Associates for City Manager recruitment services in an amount not to exceed $30,000. The motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Bhateja. Approved, Vote: 5-0.

MOTION PASSED: 5-0
AYE: Tankha, Bhateja, Mok, Swan, Tyson
NOES: None
RECUE: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

Los Altos Hills Special City Council Meeting Minutes Page 2 Thursday, December 18, 2025

5. ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 2:40 P.M.

Respectfully submitted,
Arika Birdsong-Miller

ITEM 5H
Thursday, December 18, 2025, at 6:00 P.M.

Council Chambers, 26379 Fremont Road, Los Altos Hills, California

Present: Mayor Kavita Tankha, Vice Mayor Rajiv Bhateja, Council Member Stanley Mok, Council Member Linda Swan, Council Member George Tyson

Absent: None
Staff: Acting City Manager Cody Einfalt, Public Works Director WooJae Kim, Community Development Director Jay Bradford, Finance Director Thomas Leung, and City Clerk Arika Birdsong-Miller
CALL TO ORDER (6:00 P.M.)
Mayor Tankha called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M.

ROLL CALL
Mayor Kavita Tankha, Vice Mayor Rajiv Bhateja, Council Member Stanley Mok, Council Member Linda Swan, and Council Member Tyson were present.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.

1. AGENDA REVIEW
The agenda was approved as presented.

2. PRESENTATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS
A. Appointment to the Los Altos Hills Finance and Investment Committee Vice Mayor Bhateja made a motion to appoint Vatsal Sonecha to the Finance and Investment Committee. Council Member Tyson seconded the motion. APPROVED, VOTE 5-0
B. Presentation Honoring Los Altos Hills 2025 Lifetime Volunteer Award Recipients Mayor Kavita Tankha presented the 2025 Lifetime Volunteer Award to Valerie Metcalfe, Patricia Radlo, Roddy Sloss, and Sue Welch.

C. Presentation Honoring Los Altos Hills Legacy of Service Award

Mayor Kavita Tankha presented the Legacy of Service Award to Jitze and Nancy Couperus.

3. PRESENTATIONS FROM THE FLOOR
There were no public comments.

4. INFORMATIONAL REPORTS (items provided solely for informational purposes) A. Treasurer’s Report – This item was provided solely for informational purposes.

B. Disbursement Report - This item was provided solely for informational purposes.

5. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Resolution of the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills Approving and Authorizing the Execution of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for City Attorney Services between the Town of Los Altos Hills and Redwood Public Law LLP.

Acting City Manager Cody Einfalt presented a report recommending that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the City Attorney Services Agreement with Redwood Public Law, LLP. He explained that Redwood Public Law has provided City Attorney services to the Town since March 2024 and has continued to provide services under the same compensation structure despite increased staffing and operational costs.

Mr. Einfalt noted that the proposed amendment would increase the monthly general counsel retainer from $13,465 to $14,777, representing a 9 percent increase, and would adjust hourly rates for special services, cost recovery matters, litigation, and paralegal work. He further explained that the amendment formalizes an increase in the estimated monthly retainer hours from 40 to 50 hours to more accurately reflect the level of services being provided.

He advised that the proposed rate adjustments would take effect on January 1, 2026, and that the associated costs can be absorbed within the existing City Attorney services budget without requiring additional appropriations. Staff will continue to monitor expenditures and report any material variances through the regular budget review process.

Public Comment:

1. John O’Connell, resident of Los Altos Hills, stated that because the item had been discussed in Closed Session, the public had limited information regarding the agreement. He requested that an update be provided outlining the agreement and the proposed changes prior to the item being considered on the Consent Calendar.

Vice Mayor Bhateja made a motion to approve the Resolution of the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills Approving and Authorizing the Execution of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement for City Attorney Services between the Town of Los Altos Hills and Redwood Public Law LLP. Council Member Mok seconded the motion.

APPROVED, VOTE 5-0
MOTION PASSED: 5-0
AYES: Tankha, Bhateja, Mok, Swan, Tyson
NOES: None
RECUSE: None

ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

6. SPECIAL ITEMS
A. Recognition of Mayor Kavita Tankha
Vice Mayor Bhateja thanked Mayor Tankha for her leadership and presented her with a plaque recognizing her Mayoral term.

Supervisor Margaret Abe-Koga presented accommodation on behalf of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors to Mayor Tankha.

B. City Council Reorganization

1. Election of New Mayor and Administration of Oath of Office Council Member Swan made a motion to appoint Vice Mayor Bhateja as Mayor.

Council Member Tyson seconded the motion. APPROVED, VOTE 5-0 MOTION PASSED: 5-0
AYES: Tankha, Bhateja, Mok, Swan, Tyson
NOES: None
RECUSE: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

2. Election of New Vice Mayor and Administration of Oath of Office Council Member Tyson self-nominated for the position of Vice Mayor.

Council Member Swan self-nominated for the position of Vice Mayor.

Public Comments:

1. Tina Walia, Vice Mayor of the City of Saratoga, addressed the City Council to offer congratulations to outgoing Mayor Kavita Tankha and incoming Mayor Rajiv Bhateja and Vice Mayor. She spoke to the strong working relationship between the City of Saratoga and the Town of Los Altos Hills, noting shared regional issues such as disaster preparedness, wildfire concerns, climate change, and law enforcement coordination. Vice Mayor Walia expressed appreciation for the collaborative efforts among regional jurisdictions and conveyed her respect and best wishes to the City Council.

2. Sergio Lopez, Council Member of the City of Campbell, Chair of the Valley Transportation Authority and President of the League of California Cities Peninsula Division, addressed the City Council to offer congratulations to outgoing Mayor Kavita Tankha and express appreciation for her leadership and service. He spoke to the strong sense of community in Los Altos Hills and emphasized the importance of preserving the Town’s character. Council Member Lopez expressed his support for continued regional collaboration and stated his willingness to work with the Town on shared priorities, including infrastructure funding, wildfire preparedness, and regional advocacy efforts.

3. Joan Denler, introduced a colleague from Assemblymember Berman’s office, Kevin

Fong, and stated that she was representing Senator Josh Becker. She conveyed congratulations to the incoming Mayor, thanked the outgoing Mayor, and expressed appreciation for the City Council’s service to the Town of Los Altos Hills. Ms. Denler stated that the Senator’s office looks forward to continuing recent discussions with the Town and remains available for further coordination.

4. Allan Epstein, a Los Altos Hills resident, emphasized the importance of adhering to the Town’s established process for Council appointments. He stated that following the process helps avoid decisions based on personalities or perceived quid pro quo and referenced prior Council actions where the process was followed despite controversy. Mr. Epstein stated his view that the established process should be followed this year and that Council Member Tyson should be selected as Vice Mayor. He further noted that both candidates were qualified and experienced and expressed that maintaining the established process would help minimize controversy and provide continuity.

5. John O’Connell, a Los Altos Hills resident, stated that it is important for the City Council to solicit and consider resident input on difficult topics. He spoke to his experience interacting with Council Member Tyson, noting that while they have not always agreed, he found Council Member Tyson to be accessible, considerate, and willing to listen. Mr. O’Connell referenced a prior Council matter in which Council Member Tyson helped resolve a potential stalemate by working across differing viewpoints. He expressed his agreement with prior public comments that the established process should be followed and stated his view that Council Member Tyson should be selected as Vice Mayor.

6. The Vice Mayor of the Town of Portola Valley addressed the City Council to offer congratulations to the outgoing Mayor and the incoming Mayor and Vice Mayor. She spoke to the strong relationship between Portola Valley and Los Altos Hills and expressed appreciation for Council Member Linda Swan’s regional representation through the League of California Cities. The Vice Mayor noted that while she did not wish to weigh in on the Town’s decision, she shared her perspective that serving effectively as Vice Mayor requires time and experience.

7. Yen Zhao, Council Member of the City of Saratoga addressed the City Council to offer congratulations to the incoming Mayor and to thank outgoing Mayor Kavita Tankha for her years of service. She noted that the City of Saratoga has experienced similar leadership decisions and acknowledged the difficulty of the process. Council Member Zhao expressed her support for the City Council’s decision and stated that both candidates were qualified to serve, wishing the Council well moving forward.

8. Jim Waschura, a Los Altos Hills resident, addressed the City Council and stated that while both potential candidates were highly qualified, he agreed with prior comments emphasizing adherence to the established process. He referenced Council Member Tyson’s effectiveness in advancing significant infrastructure improvements and expressed his view that Council Member Tyson’s engagement and leadership, particularly on housing-related issues, would be beneficial to the Town.

Council Member Mok made a motion to appoint Council Member Tyson to serve a sixmonth term as Vice Mayor, followed by Council Member Swan for the subsequent sixmonth term. Mayor Bhateja seconded the motion. APPROVED, VOTE 5-0 MOTION PASSED: 5-0

AYES: Bhateja, Mok, Swan, Tankha, Tyson
NOES: None
RECUSE: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None

7. ADJOURN
Mayor Bhateja adjourned the meeting at 7:26 PM.

ITEM 5I
TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 15, 2026
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY25/26 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND DRAINAGE

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ADVERTISE

FOR FORMAL BID
FROM: WooJae Kim, Public Works Director
John Chau, Project Manager
APPROVED: Cody Einfalt, Acting City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a resolution (Attachment 1) to:

1. Approve the Plans and Specifications for the FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project; and

2. Authorize staff to advertise the project for formal bid.

BACKGROUND:

The Annual Road Rehabilitation Program is an ongoing capital improvement program focused on maintaining and enhancing the Town's public streets to ensure safe and reliable operations. The primary scope of the program is to preserve the overall good pavement conditions of the Town's roadway network.

The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area published an update to the Pavement Condition of Bay Area Jurisdictions 2024 report on January 5, 2026. The report indicates that Los Altos Hill continues to maintain a “very good” pavement condition, with a 3-year moving average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of 80. As of the end of 2024, Los Altos Hills ranks seventh among Bay Area jurisdictions based on average PCI. The report is available on the MTC website at PCI_table2024DataJanuary2026Update.pdf.

The annual capital project implemented under this program is referred to as the Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project (Project). In addition to pavement rehabilitation, staff evaluate project streets to identify opportunities to address drainage improvements and traffic safety concerns.

As adopted in the FY 2025-2026 Operating and Capital Budget, funding sources for the annual program include State Gas Tax, Senate Bill 1 (Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017) Funds, Vehicle Registration Fees, Drainage In-lieu Fees, Street Encroachment Fees, Measure B (Local Streets and Roads) Fund, and General Fund.

Staff Report to City Council Page 2
FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project January 15, 2026
DISCUSSION:

The annual pavement rehabilitation projects include a range of operations, including street overlay and microsurfacing, intended to extend the pavement service life and reduce the need for more costly full street reconstruction. Street overlay typically involves placing a two-inch asphalt overlay every 15 to 20 years. Microsurfacing involves applying a thin coat of asphalt emulsion and fine aggregate mixture at intervals of approximately five to eight years, provided the pavement’s structural integrity remains sound. For both operation types, localized pavement failures are repaired in advance of overlay or microsurfacing activities.

Project streets selected for rehabilitation each fiscal year are drawn initially from the five-year street list developed through the MTC’s Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program (PTAP) report. Final street selection is further informed by field investigations, observed pavement conditions, known maintenance issues, coordination with other planned improvements (such as underground utility work), and cost considerations.

Through the P-TAP program, MTC supports the Town by assisting with pavement condition assessments, management of the Town’s StreetSaver pavement database, development of fiveyear street recommendations, and analysis of Pavement Management Program budget needs. MTC funds approximately 80 percent of the consultant costs associated with pavement assessments and related studies. P-TAP grants are available every two to three years, and the most recent Pavement Management Program Update was completed in April 2025 (Attachment 2). StreetSaver is a webbased pavement management system developed by MTC to support local agencies with pavement asset management.

FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement – Project Streets Approximately 2.2 miles of road pavement are included in the FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project. The list of proposed street segments and treatments is shown below:

Street From To Length
(Feet) Type of Work
Corbetta Lane
(Alternate #2) Altamont Road End 1,193 2" AC Overlay with Digoutsand AC Dike Replacement Corte Madera
Lane
Concepcion
Road End N/A 6" Digouts (localized repairs)
East Sunset Drive
(Alternate #1) Burke Road End 1,022 2" AC Overlay with Digouts Elena Road Robleda Road Josefa Lane N/A
6" Digouts (localized repairs)
Striping improvement at
Vinedo Lane
Elena Road Vinedo Lane Becky Lane 1,405
Microsurfacing with Digouts
Striping improvement at
Venedo Lane
Fremont Road Arastradero
Road
Saint Francis
Road 3,551
2" AC Overlay with Digouts,
AC Dike Replacement, added
Shoulder Backing and Area
Reconstruction

Staff Report to City Council Page 3
FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project January 15, 2026
Robleda Road Elena Road Chapin Road 4,315 Microsurfacing with Digouts Total 11,486

2.2 Miles
Staff intend to work on all project streets listed above; however, two street segments are included as alternate items in case bids are over the engineer’s estimates and budget, so that alternate items can be deferred to a future year, as needed.

Staff prepared the Project Plans, Specifications, and cost estimates in-house. Staff recommend that Council approve the Plans and Specifications—available on the Town’s website (https://www.losaltoshills.ca.gov/579/City-Council-Meeting-Documents), and authorize advertising the project for a formal bid.

Once authorized, a Notice to Bidders will be published in the Los Altos Town Crier and posted on the Town’s website. Staff will also distribute the notice to regional Builders Exchanges covering Alameda County, Santa Clara County, Contra Costa County, the Peninsula, and the greater San Francisco Bay Area, and will proactively contact qualified contractors by phone and email.

After bid opening, staff will return to Council with a recommendation to award the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder. The following tentative schedule has been developed for the project:

Bids Open February 2026
Council Award Construction Contract March 2026
Begin Construction April 2026
Complete Construction June 2026
Road Safety and Traffic Calming
In the 2025-2026 Adopted Operating and Capital Budget, a new capital improvement project (CIP) was approved for Road Safety and Traffic Calming with an annual fiscal year budget of $60,000.

Through this new CIP, staff are actively evaluating road safety and traffic calming concerns throughout the Town. Where feasible, mitigation measures for road safety and traffic calming will be coordinated and implemented in conjunction with the annual Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project.

As part of this year’s Project, a traffic calming improvement is proposed at the intersection of Elena Road and Vinedo Lane to address resident concerns related to vehicle speeds and traffic safety along this curved segment of Elena Road. The Town’s traffic engineering consultant has prepared a plan recommending six-inch-wide white edge line striping (Detail 27B) to create 11- foot-wide lanes, along with installation of 20-miles-per-hour warning signs on both northbound and southbound directions to reduce vehicle speeds. The plan is included as Attachment 3. The contractor for the Project will complete the striping work, and the Town’s crew will install the warning signs following completion of the striping improvements.

Staff Report to City Council Page 4
FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project January 15, 2026
In addition, the traffic engineering consultant evaluated six other heavily traveled curved roadway segments and recommended signage enhancements to improve safety. The signage improvement plans for these locations are included as Attachment 4. Staff have ordered the recommended signs and will install them upon delivery, which is anticipated next month. 2024-25 CITY COUNCIL WORK PLAN:

This action is identified on the 2024-25 City Council Work Plan under “Protect and Maintain Infrastructure” Priority for “FY 2025-2026 Street Repair Project.”

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is a class 1 categorical exclusion per Article 19 (Categorical exclusions) section 15301(c) Existing facilities of the California Environmental Quality ACT (CEQA) guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT
The FY25/26 Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Program budget, which includes additional VTA Measure B funds and carryover FY24/25 program funds, totals $1,671,349. The estimated construction cost for the FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project is $1,639,338, as shown below:

Approved Funding Source: Budget
FY 25-26 Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Program Fund $ 1,366,600 Remaining FY 24-25 Annual Pavement Rehabilitation Program Fund $ 86,791 Santa Clara County VTA Measure B $ 217,958
Total $ 1,671,349
Cost Items: Cost
Construction Contract $ 1,443,832
Project Contingency 8% $ 115,506
Testing & Inspection Services $ 80,000
Total Estimated Project Cost $ 1,639,338
There are sufficient funds for the project in the capital program, and no additional appropriation is needed for this project.

ATTACHMENT

1. Resolution

2. PTAP-25 Report

3. Elena Road and Vinedo Lane Improvements

4. Signage Improvements at Six Locations

ITEM 5I Attachment 1
RESOLUTION NO. ___-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE FY25/26 PAVEMENT

REHABILITATION AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND

AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ADVERTISE FOR FORMAL BID
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director of the Town of Los Altos Hills recommends that the project plans and specifications for the FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project be approved by Council; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Director recommends that the City Council authorize staff to advertise the project for formal bid.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills that:

1. The Plans and Specifications for the FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project, as described in the staff report to the City Council for the agenda item, are hereby approved; and

2. The Public Works Director is authorized to advertise the FY25/26 Pavement Rehabilitation and Drainage Improvement Project for formal bid.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 15
th day of January 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
Rajiv Bhateja, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Arika Birdsong-Miller, City Clerk

1003 W. Cutting Blvd., Suite 110
Point Richmond, CA 94804
NCE Project No. 55.161.55
Final Report
PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Town of Los Altos Hills
Town of Los
Altos Hills
Town of Los Altos Hills
Public Works
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
April 2025
ITEM 5I Attachment 2

Final Report
PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Town of Los Altos Hills
April 2025
Prepared for:

Town of Los Altos Hills
Town of Los Altos Hills Public Works
26379 Fremont Road
Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Prepared by:

Jakrit Yoojaroen
Staff Engineer I
Debaroti Ghosh, Ph.D.

Project Engineer II
Shahram Misaghi, PE
Associate Engineer
NCE
1003 W. Cutting Blvd., Suite 110
Point Richmond, CA 94804
(510) 215-3620
NCE Project No. 55.161.55
The preparation of this report has been financed in part by grants from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S.

Department of Transportation.

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Executive Summary Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
ES-1
Executive Summary
In 2024, Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) was selected by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) to update the Town of Los Altos Hills’ pavement management program (PMP) as part of the Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program, Round 25 (P-TAP 25). This report summarizes the results of the 2024 update and its purpose to help educate policy makers about the current condition of the street network and the impact of various funding scenarios on future network conditions.

The Town of Los Altos Hills (Town) is responsible for maintaining approximately 62.3 centerline miles of pavement, or 276 pavement sections, which represents a substantial investment of approximately $86.3 million.

In 2024 NCE collected pavement condition data throughout the entire network using MTC distress protocols.

Survey data were entered into the StreetSaver® database, which the Town uses as a decision-support tool.

Overall, the Town’s pavement network is currently in “Good” condition with an average pavement condition index (PCI) of 80. Over 86.3 percent of street network is in “Good” condition with 0.6 percent of the streets in “Poor” condition.

The budget needs analysis indicated that the Town needs to spend $14.3 million over the next five years to bring the street network to a condition that can be maintained with on-going preventive maintenance in the most cost-effective way. Additionally, four alternative budget scenarios were performed to illustrate the impacts of different funding levels. The following table lists each scenario with its corresponding five-year budget, the PCI and deferred maintenance at the end of the analysis period. NCE recommends that the Town pursue Scenario 3, which will maintain the network PCI at 80 in five years. This scenario will improve the portion of the network in “Good” condition and slightly increase the deferred maintenance by 2029. It will require $8.6 million over the next five years.

Scenario Description 5-Year Budget ($M) 2029 PCI 2029 Deferred Maintenance ($M)
1 Annual Budget of $1.2M/Yr 6.0 79 9.9
2 Annual Budget of $1.0M/Yr 5.0 78 11.2
3 Maintain PCI at 80
($1.7M/year on Average) 8.6 80 7.2
4 Unconstrained Budget
($2.8M/Year on Average) 14.1 83 0.3

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Table of Contents Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary............................................................................................................................1 1 Introduction and Background.................................................................................................1 2 Network Summary.................................................................................................................3 3 Pavement Condition ..............................................................................................................4

3.1 Town’s Pavement Condition Index ........................................................................................... 5

3.2 Town's Network Condition Breakdown.................................................................................... 6

3.3 PCI Comparison with Neighboring Agencies............................................................................. 7 4 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies ............................................................................8 5 Budget Analyses ....................................................................................................................9

5.1 Budget Needs Analysis............................................................................................................ 10

5.2 Scenario 1: Town’s Existing Budget of $1.2M/year................................................................ 11

5.3 Scenario 2: Town’s Modified Budget of $1.0M/year.............................................................. 12

5.4 Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 80 ($1.7M/year on Average) ...................................................... 13

5.5 Scenario 4: Unconstrained Budget ($2.8M/Year on Average)................................................ 14

5.6 Scenario Comparisons............................................................................................................. 15 6 Conclusions and Recommendations......................................................................................18 List of Figures
Figure 1. Examples of Streets with Different PCIs.........................................................................................4 Figure 2. Historical Network PCI and Treatment History since 2019 ............................................................5 Figure 3. Network Condition Breakdown (Average PCI) by Functional Classification...................................6 Figure 4. Comparison of Town’s PCI to Neighboring Agencies and Statewide Average ...............................7 Figure 5. Costs of Maintaining Residential Pavement Over Time .................................................................8 Figure 6. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1................................................................................11 Figure 7. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2................................................................................12 Figure 8. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3................................................................................13 Figure 9. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 4................................................................................14 Figure 10. Comparison of Annual PCI by Scenario ......................................................................................15 Figure 11. Comparison of Annual Deferred Maintenance by Scenario.......................................................16 Figure 12. Comparison of Pavement Condition Breakdown by Scenario ...................................................17

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Table of Contents Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
ii
List of Tables
Table 1. Network Summary Statistics............................................................................................................3 Table 2. Pavement Condition Breakdown by Functional Classification ........................................................6 Table 3. Summary Results for Budget Needs Analysis................................................................................10 Table 4. Summary Results for Scenario 1 ....................................................................................................11 Table 5. Summary Results for Scenario 2 ....................................................................................................12 Table 6. Summary Results for Scenario 3 ....................................................................................................13 Table 7. Summary Results for Scenario 4 ....................................................................................................14 List of Appendices
Appendix A
Section Description Inventory
Appendix B
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree
Appendix C
Budget Needs Analysis Results
Appendix D
Budget Scenario Results
Appendix E
Pavement Condition Maps
Appendix F
Sections Selected for Treatment: Scenario 1
Appendix G
Quality Management Report

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Introduction and Background Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
1 1 Introduction and Background
In 2024, Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd. (NCE) was selected by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) to update the Town of Los Altos Hills’ (Town) pavement management program (PMP) as part of the Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program, Round 25 (P-TAP 25). This report summarizes the results of the 2024/2025 update and its purpose to help educate policy makers about the current condition of the street network and the impact of various funding scenarios on future network condition.

In general, PMPs are "designed to provide objective information and useful data for analysis so that… managers can make more consistent, cost effective, and defensible decisions related to the preservation of a pavement network.1"
The goals of the 2024/2025 update were to:
• Update the existing pavement network inventory to include new streets, • Perform pavement condition surveys,
• Update historical maintenance records (e.g., previously resurfaced pavements), • Update the maintenance and rehabilitation decision tree and associated costs, • Perform budgetary analyses and determine funding needs, and • Prepare a final PMP report documenting the results of the update.

To update Town's PMP, NCE performed a walking condition survey in 2024 using the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's (MTC) modified2 ASTM D64333survey procedures for the entire network. Walking surveys were performed by one or two-person crews to record all pavement distresses. The surveys did not include non-pavement issues such as traffic, safety and road hazards, geometric issues, shoulders, sidewalks, curb and gutters, drainage issues, or immediate maintenance needs. All survey data were entered into the Town's StreetSaver® database, and pavement condition index (PCI) calculations were performed. NCE then met with agency representatives and reviewed and updated the Town's decision tree including maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) strategies and treatment unit costs. A budget needs analysis was then performed, and four budget scenarios were analyzed for the street network.

This report answers the following questions for the Town:
• What does the Town's pavement network include?
• What is the current condition of the pavement network? • What are the Town's current M&R strategies?
• How much funding is required to perform all M&R treatments needed over the next five years? 1 AASHTO “Guidelines for Pavement Management Systems”. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, July 1990.
2 PCI Distress Identification Manuals (AC 5th Edition, PCC 4th Edition), Metropolitan Transportation Commission, San Francisco, CA March 2022.
3 ASTM D6433 Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2023, www.astm.org.

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Introduction and Background Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
2 • How will the Town's current funding impact the condition of the network and the overall deferred maintenance??
• What effect will other funding levels have on the network condition and deferred maintenance?

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Pavement Condition Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
3 2 Network Summary
The Town is responsible for maintaining approximately 62.3 centerline miles of streets (or 276 pavement sections). The majority of the network is composed of asphalt concrete (AC) pavement sections and asphalt concrete overlay (AC/AC)
Table 1. Network Summary Statistics
Functional Class Number of Sections Centerline Miles Lane Miles Network Area (%) Arterial 9 4.7 9.4 9.2%
Collector 51 21.6 43.1 34.8%
Residential 216 36.0 71.9 56.0%
Total 276 62.3 124.4 100.0%
The street network replacement cost is estimated to be approximately $86.3 million. This can be viewed as the value of the pavement network and is the amount needed to fund a reconstruction of the entire paved network.

The replacement cost is calculated by multiplying the total pavement area by the unit cost of reconstruction of the pavement structure. It does not include related infrastructure assets such as sidewalks, signals, markings, signs, or storm drains.

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Pavement Condition Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
4 3 Pavement Condition
Pavement condition is typically quantified using the pavement condition index (PCI), which ranges from 100 (best) to 0 (worst). Pavement conditions are affected by the environment, traffic loads and volumes, construction materials, and age. Figure 1 shows examples of streets with varying PCIs.

The PCI scale is divided into four general condition categories. Pavements in “Good” condition have a PCI above 70, pavements in “Fair” condition have a PCI between 50 and 69, pavements in “Poor” condition have a PCI between 25 and 49, and finally pavements in “Failed” condition have a PCI below 25.

Figure 1. Examples of Streets with Different PCIs

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies Town of Los Altos Hills Final Report April 2025
5 A list of all sections in the network along with their attributes, including the PCI at the time of last inspection, is provided in Appendix A. For convenience, two versions are provided – one sorted alphabetically by street name and the other sorted by descending PCI.

3.1 Town’s Pavement Condition Index
The current average PCI for the Town’s network is 80. This value is an area-weighted calculation performed in StreetSaver® and is based on the condition survey performed in 2024.

Figure 2 illustrates the Town’s historical network PCI for the streets and treated lane miles by treatment types.

The PCI values shown were obtained from field inspection update only. The Network PCI was maintained at 80 since 2019, reflecting the success of a preservation-forward maintenance strategy. The Town conducted annual maintenance and rehabilitation projects that include slurry seals and overlays over the past few years. All projects contributed towards maintaining the Town’s network condition.

Figure 2. Historical Network PCI and Treatment History since 2019

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies Town of Los Altos Hills Final Report April 2025
6 3.2 Town's Network Condition Breakdown
Figure 3 breaks down the current street network PCI by functional classification. The average pavement condition for arterials is the highest with a PCI of 87 followed by residentials with an average PCI of 80 and collectors with an average PCI of 79. Table 2 summarizes the street network by condition category and functional classification. Approximately, 86 percent of the street network is in “Good” condition with only 0.6 percent of the streets in “Poor” condition. There is no streets in the “Failed” condition category.

Figure 3. Network Condition Breakdown (Average PCI) by Functional Classification Table 2. Pavement Condition Breakdown by Functional Classification Condition Category PCI Range Arterial (%) Collector (%) Residential (%) Entire Network (%)
Good 70 – 100 9.2 28.2 48.9 86.3
Fair 50 – 69 0.0 6.6 6.5 13.1
Poor 25 – 49 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6
Failed < 25 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total - 9.2 34.8 56.0 100.0
Arterial,
PCI = 87
Collector,
PCI = 79
Residential,
PCI = 80

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies Town of Los Altos Hills Final Report April 2025
7 3.3 PCI Comparison with Neighboring Agencies
Figure 4 shows the Town’s 2024 average network PCI compared to neighboring agencies as well as the statewide average PCI from the 2022 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment4. As illustrated, the Town’s network PCI is in the higher group among the neighboring agencies and is 15 points higher than the 2022 statewide average.

Figure 4. Comparison of Town’s PCI to Neighboring Agencies and Statewide Average 4 “California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment 2022 Update”. Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd., CA, 2023.

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies Town of Los Altos Hills Final Report April 2025
8 4 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategies
The Town’s current M&R strategies include cost-effective preventive treatments. In general, crack sealing or microsurfacing will be applied to pavements in “Good” condition; pavements in “Fair” condition will receive either patching with a cape seal or an overlay with 5% Base Repairs (BR); and pavements in “Failed” condition will receive patching with thick overlay with 5% BR. The Town’s M&R strategies are formalized into a decision tree5(presented in Appendix B), which is instrumental in performing the budget needs analysis and budget scenarios.

Experience and research have shown that it costs much less to maintain pavement in good condition than to repair pavement that has already failed. Figure 5 shows types and unit costs for the Town’s residential streets as an example. As shown, by allowing pavements to deteriorate, streets that currently cost $3.50/Square Yard (SY) to seal may soon cost $42.00/SY to patch with an overlay with base repairs, or $84.25/SY to perform reconstruction. In other words, delaying repairs can significantly increase M&R costs. Note that micro surfacing can be placed on approximately 13 times as many lane miles as those requiring patching with thick overlay for the pavements with failed condition.

Figure 5. Costs of Maintaining Residential Pavement Over Time 5 Note: The StreetSaver®
“Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree” divides the “Fair” condition category to separate pavements with primarily non-load-related distresses (e.g., longitudinal cracking) from those with load-related distresses (e.g., fatigue cracking).

Good
Fair
Poor
Failed
40% 75% 90%
Seal Cracks, Micro Surfacing
$3.50 - 14.50/SY
Surface Seal + 5% BR
$24.25/SY
Patch and Overlay (2’’ AC Overlay + 5% BR)
$42.00/SY
Reconstruct Structure
$84.25/SY
Percent of Used Pavement Life
Pavement Condition
Category
50 70
0 25
100

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
9 5 Budget Analyses
Based on the principle that it costs less to maintain streets in good condition than it does to repair those that have failed, cost-effective PMPs employ strategies that eliminate deferred maintenance6 and then maintain the network with on-going preventive maintenance. Such strategies bring the network condition to an optimal PCI that can be maintained over time.

The first step in developing such a cost-effective strategy is to determine the total maintenance budget needs of the network. The next step is to conduct alternative budget scenario analyses. In consultation with the Town, NCE selected and performed four funding scenarios for the analysis using StreetSaver® based on an inflation rate of 4.0 percent for an analysis period of 5 years.
• Scenario 1: Town’s Existing Budget of $1.2M/year – This scenario shows the impact of using the Town’s current budget of $1.2 million per year on pavement M&R over the next 5 years. • Scenario 2: Town’s Modified Budget of $1.0M/year – This scenario shows the impact of using the Town’s reduced budget of $1.0 million per year on pavement M&R over the next 5 years. • Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 80 ($1.7M/year on Average) – This scenario aims to maintain the network PCI at 80 over the next 5 years.
• Scenario 4: Unconstrained Budget ($2.8M/Year on Average) – This scenario shows the impact of applying an unlimited budget for pavement M&R over the next 5 years.

The budget needs analysis and budget scenarios are presented in the following subsections. The detailed results of the budget needs analysis are provided in Appendix C. The detailed results of the budget scenarios are provided in Appendix D. Additionally, maps illustrating the current pavement condition and the projected 2029 pavement condition for each scenario are provided in Appendix E. 6 Deferred maintenance is M&R not performed due to insufficient funding.

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
10 5.1 Budget Needs Analysis
The total budget needs for the network represents the cost associated with performing M&R treatments at the optimal time – optimal meaning the PCI is maximized and the cost is minimized – over the analysis period. This was done by performing a budget needs analysis in StreetSaver® with an inflation rate of 4.0 percent for an analysis period of 5 years. The budget needs for the analysis period are presented in Table 3, and are estimated to be $14.3 million. Of the total budget needs, approximately $8.3 million (58.5 percent) is devoted to preventive maintenance, while the rest is allocated for rehabilitation and reconstruction treatments.

Table 3. Summary Results for Budget Needs Analysis
Fiscal Year 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
Budget Needs ($M) 7.1 2.1 1.8 1.1 2.2 14.3
Treated PCI 86 85 85 84 84 NA
Untreated PCI 80 79 77 76 74 NA
If the Town follows this ideal, cost-effective strategy, the average network PCI will immediately increase to 86 as a large amount of current Town deferred maintenance ($7.1 million) is addressed in the first year and then maintain at mid 80s by 2029. This type of budget, that addresses all the deferred maintenance in the first year, is known as front-loaded. Alternatively, if no maintenance is performed over the next 5 years, the network PCI will drop to 74 by 2029.

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
11 5.2 Scenario 1: Town’s Existing Budget of $1.2M/year This scenario assumes the Town will have an annual budget of $6.0M for pavement M&R for the next 5 years.

As shown in Table 4 and Figure 6, the network PCI will decrease to 79 and the deferred maintenance will increase to $9.9 million by 2029. Percent of the network in “Good” condition will decrease to about 83.4 percent.

Table 4. Summary Results for Scenario 1
Year Current 2025* 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
Budget ($M) NA 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 6.0
Deferred Maintenance
($M) 7.1 5.9 7.1 8.0 8.3 9.9 NA
Treated PCI 80 82 81 80 80 79 NA
*Includes 2025 projects
Figure 6. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 1

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
12 5.3 Scenario 2: Town’s Modified Budget of $1.0M/year This scenario assumes the Town will have a modified budget of $1.0M/year for pavement M&R for the next 5 years. As shown in Table 5 and Figure 7, the network PCI will decrease to 78 and the deferred maintenance will increase to $11.2 million by 2029. Percent of the network in “Good” condition will decrease to about 79.7 percent.

Table 5. Summary Results for Scenario 2
Year Current 2025* 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
Budget ($M) NA 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 5.0
Deferred Maintenance
($M) 7.1 6.1 7.5 8.6 9.4 11.2 NA
Treated PCI 80 82 81 80 79 78 NA
*Includes 2025 projects
Figure 7. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 2

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
13 5.4 Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 80 ($1.7M/year on Average) This scenario aims to maintain the network PCI at 80 by 2029. As shown in Table 6 and Figure 8, the monetary investment needed to achieve this objective is $8.6 million (or approximately $1.7 million per year). This scenario will result in 81.0 percent of the network being in “Good” condition with no the sections in “Failed” condition. The deferred maintenance will slightly increase to $7.2 million by 2029.

Table 6. Summary Results for Scenario 3
Year Current 2025* 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
Budget ($M) NA 1.0 0.4 1.8 2.2 3.2 8.6
Deferred Maintenance
($M) 7.1 6.1 8.1 8.4 7.7 7.2 NA
Treated PCI 80 82 80 80 80 80 NA
*Includes 2025 projects
Figure 8. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 3

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
14 5.5 Scenario 4: Unconstrained Budget ($2.8M/Year on Average) This scenario aims to maximize the overall pavement condition across the entire network by 2029 through unlimited funding. As shown in Table 7 and Figure 9, the monetary investment required to fully address all current and anticipated pavement needs is estimated at $14.1 million (or approximately $2.8 million per year).

With no budget constraints, nearly the entire network is projected to remain in “Good” condition. The network PCI will be maintained around mid-80s. Moreover, the deferred maintenance backlog is effectively reduced to $0.3 million by 2029 under this scenario.

Table 7. Summary Results for Scenario 4
Year Current 2025* 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
Budget ($M) NA 7.0 2.0 1.8 1.1 2.2 14.1
Deferred Maintenance
($M) 7.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 NA
Treated PCI 80 86 85 84 83 83 NA
*Includes 2025 projects
Figure 9. PCI vs Deferred Maintenance for Scenario 4

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
15 5.6 Scenario Comparisons
Figure 10 graphically compares the annual changes in PCI for each of the four scenarios. As previously noted, the average network PCI will be maintained above 80 in Scenario 4; while in Scenario 3, it will be maintained at 80 throughout the analysis period.

Figure 10. Comparison of Annual PCI by Scenario

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
16 Figure 11 illustrates the changes in deferred maintenance over time for each scenario. For scenario 1 through scenario 3, the current deferred maintenance will increase from $7.1 million to $9.9 million in Scenario 1, and $11.2 million in Scenario 2. The deferred maintenance will be maintained around $7 million in Scenario 3. As for Scenario 4, the deferred maintenance will decrease significantly to $0.3 million by 2029.

Figure 11. Comparison of Annual Deferred Maintenance by Scenario

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Budget Analyses Town of Los Altos Hills
Final Report April 2025
17 Figure 12 illustrates the percentage change in pavement conditions for each scenario. As noted earlier, currently approximately 86.3 percent of the network is in “Good” condition with 13.1 percent of the sections in “Fair” condition. For Scenario 1, the portion of the network in “Good” condition will decrease to 83.4 percent and portion of network in “Fair” condition will increase to 16.6 percent. Scenarios 2 will result in approximately

79.7% in “Good” condition and an increase in the fair condition to 20.3 percent. Scenario 3 will have similar results to Scenario 1 with more than 80% in “Good” condition category. Finally, Scenario 4 will significantly increase the “Good” condition to 93.4%.

Figure 12. Comparison of Pavement Condition Breakdown by Scenario

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Conclusions and Recommendations Town of Los Altos Hills Final Report April 2025
18 6 Conclusions and Recommendations
In summary, the Town of Los Altos Hills has a substantial investment of $86.3 million in the pavement network.

Overall, the Town’s streets are in “Good” condition with a 2024 average network PCI of 80. Approximately 86.3 percent of the street network is in “Good” condition with 13.1 percent in the “Fair” condition, and 0.6 percent in the “Poor” condition.

The analysis indicates that at an inflation rate of 4.0 percent, the Town needs to spend approximately $14.3 million on maintenance and rehabilitation over the next five years to optimally repair all pavement sections, thus bringing the network into a condition that can be maintained with on-going preventive maintenance. In the long run, this strategy will save the Town money by preventing future pavement deterioration to levels requiring rehabilitation or reconstruction.

Based on the data collected and the scenarios analyzed and presented in this report, NCE offers the following recommendations

1. Funding – The primary goal of PMPs should be to offer users a safe and functional pavement network without unduly increasing the maintenance burden in the future. With that in mind, the recommended scenario for the Town is Scenario 3, which requires approximately $8.6 million over the next five years.

This budget allocation will maintain the overall network PCI at 80, maintain the portion of the network in "Good" condition, and help contend escalating deferred maintenance.

To address the gap between the Town's existing funding and the recommended scenario, NCE recommends the Town pursues additional funding sources. Potential sources include:

Federal Funding Sources
• American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA)
• Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)
• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
• Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
• Bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) • Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP)
• Surface Transportation Program (STP)
• Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Conclusions and Recommendations Town of Los Altos Hills Final Report April 2025
19 State Funding Sources
• Active Transportation Program (ATP), which now includes the Bicycle Transportation Account (BTA) and Safe Routes to Schools (SR2S)
• AB 2766 (vehicle surcharge)
• CalRecycle grants
• State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
• State Water Resource Control Board
• Transportation Development Act (TDA)
• Traffic Safety Fund
• Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)
• Vehicle License Fees (VLF)
Local/Regional Funding Sources
• MTC PTAP (Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program) • Development impact fees
• Enterprise Funds (solid waste and water) MTC PTAP (Pavement Management Technical Assistance Program)
• Flood Control Districts
• General funds
• Local sales tax measures
• OBAG (One Bay Area Grant Program)
• Parcel/property taxes
• Solid waste funds
• Traffic impact fees
• Traffic safety/circulation fees
• Transportation mitigation fees
• Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT)
• Underground impact fees
• Utilities (e.g., stormwater, water, wastewater enterprise funds) • Various assessment districts (lighting, maintenance, flood control, community facilities) • Vehicle registration fees
• Vehicle code fines

PTAP-25, Pavement Management Program Update
Conclusions and Recommendations Town of Los Altos Hills Final Report April 2025
20 2. Pavement Management Strategies – Since a significant portion of the Town’s streets are currently in “Good” condition (86.3 percent), it is important to maintain that condition to the extent possible.

Preservation occurs when streets with PCIs higher than 70 receive treatments such as surface seals (slurry, microsurfacing, etc.,). Seals are relatively inexpensive treatments that prevent moisture ingress and thus preserve the integrity of the underlying base material.

3. Reinspection Strategies – In order to make appropriate management decisions based on current data, NCE recommends that the Town perform condition inspections on arterials and collectors every 2 years and on residentials at least every 4 to 5 years. Additionally, since StreetSaver® and other prediction models do not yet take into account the effect of specialized materials such as asphalt-binders with rubber or polymers, the actual performance of Town pavements may not be fully captured in the analysis models. For this additional reason, NCE recommends regular pavement condition surveys to ensure model accuracy and relevance. This also ensures that the Town remains compliant with MTC requirements for certification and funding.

4. M&R Decision Tree – NCE recommends that the Town annually review and update the M&R treatment strategies and associated unit costs to reflect current construction techniques and changing costs. This will ensure that the results for the budget analyses are reliable and as accurate as possible.

Appendix A
Section Description Inventory

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Section Description Inventory Report
This report lists a variety of section description information for each of the Town’s pavement sections. It lists the street and section identifiers, limits, functional class, surface type, number of lanes, length, width, area, Inspected PCI, and PCI date.

All of the Town’s pavement sections are included in the report. Two versions of the report are provided.

The first is sorted alphabetically by Street Name and Section ID and the second report is sorted by descending PCI. The field descriptions in this report are listed below:

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Street ID
Street Identification - A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the street. Generally, the street name is truncated to six characters. The Street ID should be unique for each street.

Section ID Section Identification - A code up to ten characters/digits to identify the section number.

The Section ID must be unique for each section of one street.

Street Name Street Name - The name of the street as indicated by street signs in the field.

Begin Location Beginning limit of the section.

End Location Ending limit of the section.

No. of Lanes Number of travel lanes.

Functional Class
(FC) Functional Classification: A = Arterial, C = Collector, R = Residential/Local Length (ft) Length of the section in feet.

Width (ft) Average width of the section in feet.

Area (sf) Area of section in square feet.

Surface Type (ST) Surface Type: A = AC Pavement, AC/AC = Asphalt Concrete Overlay PCI Date The last inspection date or rehabilitation date.

PCI Average PCI for the section. The value is based on the last inspection.

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Section Description Inventory – Sorted by Street Name

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Street Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
ADOBE LN01 ADOBE LN. - ADOBE TEPA WAY END 2 R AC/AC 1,290 34 47,162 8/28/2024 87 ADOBEC RD01 ADOBE CREEK LODGE RD. - ADOBECR MOODY RD END 2 R AC 560 21 15,360 8/28/2024 82 ADONNA CT01 ADONNA CT - ADONNA ELENA RD END 2 R AC/AC 370 23 10,310 9/4/2024 79 ALBERT LN01 ALBERTSWORTH LN. - ALBERT MAGDALENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 400 27 10,800 9/3/2024 85 ALEJAN DR01 ALEJANDRO DR. - ALEJAN ST.FRANCIS RD. END (SOUTH) 2 R AC/AC 393 20 7,860 8/15/2023 87 ALEJAN DR02 ALEJANDRO DR. - ALEJAN ST. FRANCIS RD. END (NORTH) 2 R AC 294 21 6,174 8/30/2024 89 ALEXAN PL01 ALEXANDER PL - ALEXAN FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,150 18 22,700 8/29/2024 90 ALEXIS DR01 ALEXIS DR. - ALEXIS PAGE MILL RD. TOWN LIMIT 2 R AC/AC 554 23 12,742 8/23/2024 83 ALICAN LN01 ALICANTE LN. - ALICAN MANUELLA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 670 16 11,220 8/29/2024 74 ALMADE CT01 ALMADEN CT. - ALMADE ALTAMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,840 18 35,268 8/27/2024 72 ALTADE DR01 ALTADENA DR. - ALTADE MANUELLA RD. KINGSLEY AVE 2 R AC/AC 490 18 8,820 8/29/2024 81 ALTAMO RD01 ALTAMONT RD. - ALTAMO PAGE MILL RD. BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,592 21 54,432 8/27/2024 88 ALTAMO RD02 ALTAMONT RD. - ALTAMO BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. TAAFFE RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,979 24 71,496 8/27/2024 71 ALTAMO RD03 ALTAMONT RD. - ALTAMO TAAFFE RD. CORBETTA LN. 2 C AC/AC 3,709 23 85,307 8/27/2024 93 ALTAMO RD04 ALTAMONT RD. - ALTAMO CORBETTA LN. MOODY RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,226 23 51,198 8/27/2024 94 ALTATI RD01 ALTA TIERRA RD. - ALTATI ROBLEDA RD LA PALOMA RD 2 R AC/AC 1,610 17 27,370 8/30/2024 93 ALTOVE LN01 ALTO VERDE LN. - ALTOVE CONCEPCION RD. END 2 R AC 577 22 12,694 8/30/2024 68 AMHERS CT01 AMHERST CT - AMHERS LIDDICOAT DR END 2 R AC/AC 1,100 21 24,670 8/23/2024 71 ANACAP CT01 ANACAPA CT. - ANACAP ANACAPA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 140 30 4,750 8/28/2024 90 ANACAP DR01 ANACAPA DR. - ANACAP ASCENSION DR. ST. FRANCIS RD. 2 R AC 1,854 28 51,912 8/28/2024 95 ANACAP DR02 ANACAPA DR. - ANACAP VISCAINO RD ASCENSION DR. 2 R AC 1,300 25 32,500 8/28/2024 80 ARASTR RD01 ARASTRADERO RD. - ARASTR HORSESHOE LN. STIRRUP WY. 2 A AC/AC 1,900 40 76,000 9/1/2022 85 ARASTR RD02 ARASTRADERO RD. - ARASTR PAGE MILL RD. TOWN LIMIT 2 A AC/AC 1,430 34 48,620 8/23/2024 95 ARIC LN01 ARIC LN. - ARIC FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC 940 22 22,480 8/29/2024 78 ARROYO DR01 ARROYO OAKS DR. - ARROYO RAVENSBURY AVE. END 2 R AC 565 20 11,300 9/3/2024 80 ASCENS DR01 ASCENSION DR. - ASCENS ST. FRANCIS RD. END 2 R AC 630 19 12,970 8/30/2024 81 ASCENS DR02 ASCENSION DR. - ASCENS ANACAPA DR. ST. FRANCIS DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,601 27 43,227 8/28/2024 87 ATHERT CT01 ATHERTON CT. - ATHERT ROBLEDA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 600 22 13,200 8/30/2024 81 BALERI RD01 BALERI RANCH RD. - BALERI BALERI RANCH RD. NORTH END 2 R AC/AC 250 16 5,000 8/23/2024 95 BALERI RD02 BALERI RANCH RD. - BALERI BALERI RANCH RD. SOUTH END 2 R AC/AC 260 16 5,160 8/23/2024 95 BALERI RD03 BALERI RANCH RD. - BALERI PAGE MILL RD. BALERI RANCH RD. 2 R AC/AC 365 16 5,840 8/23/2024 95 BARLEY RD01 BARLEY HILL RD. - BARLEY HILLTOP DR. END 2 R AC/AC 1,745 16 27,920 9/3/2024 73 BARTON CT01 BARTON CT. - BARTON FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC 135 18 4,430 8/29/2024 74 BEATRI LN01 BEATRICE LN. - BEATRI ROBLEDA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC 245 22 5,390 8/15/2023 84 BEAVER LN01 BEAVER LN. - BEAVER LA CRESTA DR. END 2 R AC 465 23 11,795 8/28/2024 83 BENTLE CT01 BENTLEY CT. - BENTLE BURKE RD. END 2 R AC/AC 220 18 6,160 8/30/2024 74 BERKSH DR01 BERKSHIRE DR. - BERKSHIRE WEST LOYOLA (S) WEST LOYOLA (E) 2 R AC/AC 1,855 18 33,390 9/3/2024 89 BERRYH CT01 BERRY HILL CT. - BERYHC PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 547 18 9,846 8/23/2024 83 BERRYH LN01 BERRY HILL LN. - BERYHL BERRYHILL CT END 2 R AC/AC 745 18 13,410 8/23/2024 77 BLACKM RD01 BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. - BLACKM ALTAMONT RD. NATOMA RD. 2 R AC/AC 2,816 22 61,952 8/27/2024 95 BLANDO WY01 BLANDOR WY - BLANDO OLIVE TREE LN. MAGDALENA RD. 2 R AC/AC 850 24 20,400 9/3/2024 98 BLEDSO CT01 BLEDSOE CT. - BLEDSO MOODY RD. END 2 R AC 105 35 5,075 8/28/2024 88 BRIONC CT01 BRIONES CT. - BRIONC BRIONES WAY END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 486 20 9,720 8/23/2024 82 BRIONE WY01 BRIONES WAY - BRIONE ALTAMONT RD. VIA VENTANA WY. 2 C AC/AC 1,600 20 32,000 8/23/2024 63 BURKE RD01 BURKE RD. - BURKE CHAPIN RD. 100' N. of OLD ALTOS RD./ COP 2 C AC/AC 2,038 24 48,912 8/30/2024 66 BYRD LN01 BYRD LN. - BYRD NATOMA RD. END 2 R AC 920 24 23,080 8/27/2024 95 BYRNEP LN01 BYRNE PARK LN. - BYRNEP ALTAMONT RD. W'LY PL OF 27269 BYRNE PARK LN. 2 R AC/AC 1,200 22 26,400 8/27/2024 93 BYRNEP LN02 BYRNE PARK LN. - BYRNEP W'LY PL OF 27269 BYRNE PARK LN. END 2 R AC/AC 410 22 9,020 8/27/2024 81 CAMINO DR01 CAMINO HERMOSO - CAMINO RAVENSBURY AVE. (NORTH) RAVENSBURY AVE. (SOUTH) 2 A AC/AC 3,190 20 63,800 9/3/2024 92 CAMINO ME01 CAMINO MEDIO - CAMINO VISCAINO RD. END 2 R AC 501 24 12,024 8/28/2024 87 CANARI WY01 CANARIO WY. - CANARI VISCAINO RD. END 2 R AC 950 22 21,900 8/15/2023 87 CARADO CT01 CARADO CT. - CARADO MIRANDA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 370 16 5,920 8/29/2024 71 CARILL LN01 CARILLO LN. - CARILL LA CRESTA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 450 20 9,800 8/28/2024 98 CATHAR CT01 CATHARINE CT - CATHAR DONELSON PL. END 2 R AC/AC 480 18 9,940 8/29/2024 82 CHAPIN RD01 CHAPIN RD. - CHAPIN BURKE RD. ROBLEDA RD. 2 R AC/AC 1,325 22 29,150 8/30/2024 77 CHRIST LN01 CHRISTOPHER'S LN. - CHRIST PAGE MILL RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 1,730 23 39,790 9/4/2024 83 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 1/5

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Street Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
CLAUSE CT01 CLAUSEN CT. - CLAUSE VOORHEES DR. END 2 R AC 375 24 10,055 8/22/2024 81 COLINA DR01 COLINA DR. - COLINA HILLTOP END 2 R AC/AC 475 22 12,250 9/3/2024 72 CONCEP RD01 CONCEPTION RD. - CONCEP FREMONT RD. PURISSIMA RD. 2 C AC/AC 4,604 20 92,080 8/30/2024 87 CONEJO CT01 CONEJO CT. - CONEJO ASCENSION DR. END 2 R AC/AC 310 18 6,315 8/15/2023 84 CORBET LN01 CORBETTA - CORBET ALTAMONT RD END 2 R AC/AC 1,190 19 22,610 8/27/2024 48 CORTEM LN01 CORTE MADERA LN. - CORTEM CONCEPCION RD. END 2 R AC 580 22 13,870 8/30/2024 59 COUNTR WY01 COUNTRY WY. - COUNTR PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,330 16 21,780 8/23/2024 81 CRESTR DR01 CRESTRIDGE DR. - CRESTRIDGE RAVENSBURY AVE. END 2 R AC/AC 544 33 17,952 9/3/2024 78 DAWN LN01 DAWN LN. - DAWN ELENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 400 22 9,300 9/4/2024 99 DAWNRI DR01 DAWNRIDGE DR. - DAWNRI MAGDALENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,908 31 59,148 9/3/2024 85 DAWSON DR01 DAWSON DR. - DAWSON MAGDALENA RD. 1155' W of MAGDALENA RD. Half CDS 2 R AC 1,155 20 24,600 9/3/2024 75 DAWSON DR02 DAWSON DR. - DAWSON 1155' W of MAGDALENA RD. Half CDS END 2 R AC 1,400 18 26,600 9/3/2024 76 DEBELL DR01 DEBELL DR. - DEBELL MANUELLA RD ESTACADA DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,739 34 59,126 8/29/2024 82 DEERCR LN01 DEER CREEK LN - DEERCR PURISSIMA ROAD CUL DE SAC/PRIVATE ROAD 2 R AC 585 21 12,285 8/28/2024 85 DEERFI DR01 DEERFIELD DR. - DEERFI FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 700 20 14,000 8/29/2024 96 DEERSP WY01 DEER SPRINGS WY. - DEERSP BYRNE PARK LN. 1ST BULB 2 R AC/AC 970 18 18,987 8/27/2024 95 DELSON CT01 DELSON CT - DELSON ELENA RD END 2 R AC/AC 330 30 9,900 9/4/2024 98 DEZAH WY01 DEZAHAZA WY - DEZAH TAAFFE RD. TAAFFE RD. 2 R AC/AC 1,700 18 30,600 8/27/2024 99 DIANNE DR01 DIANNE DR. - DIANNE O'KEEFE LN. END 2 R AC/AC 1,200 23 27,600 8/22/2024 60 DONELS PL01 DONELSON PL. - DONELS FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 630 19 13,270 8/29/2024 83 DORI LN01 DORI LN. - DORI ROBLEDA RD. END 2 R AC 210 22 6,445 8/30/2024 72 DUVAL WY01 DUVAL WY. - DUVAL ROBLEDA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,200 21 25,200 8/30/2024 72 EDGERT RD01 EDGERTON RD - EDGERT BLACK MOUNTAIN RD END 2 R AC/AC 1,800 21 37,800 8/28/2024 95 EDITHR RD01 EDITH RD. - EDITHR FREMONT RD. 500' N/O FREMONT RD. 2 C AC 500 33 16,500 8/29/2024 78 ELENA RD01 ELENA RD. - ELENA PURISSIMA RD. NATOMA RD. 2 C AC 3,048 21 64,008 8/22/2024 71 ELENA RD02 ELENA RD. - ELENA NATOMA RD. LA BARRANCA RD. 2 C AC/AC 3,000 23 69,000 8/22/2024 91 ELENA RD03 ELENA RD. - ELENA LA BARRANCA RD. ROBLEDA RD. 2 C AC 4,202 22 92,444 8/22/2024 69 ELENA RD04 ELENA RD. - ELENA ROBLEDA RD. VINEDO LN. 2 C AC 1,682 22 37,004 8/22/2024 76 ELENA RD05 ELENA RD. - ELENA VINEDO LN. MOODY RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,298 25 57,450 8/22/2024 75 ELMONT RD01 EL MONTE RD. - ELMONT MOODY RD. FORK AT 950' W OF STONEBROOK DR. 2 A AC/AC 1,890 36 68,040 8/22/2024 84 ELMONT RD02 EL MONTE RD. (EB) - ELMONT FORK AT 950' W OF STONEBROOK DR. SUMMERHILL 2 A AC/AC 3,851 33 127,083 8/22/2024 98 ELMONT RD03 EL MONTE RD. (WB) - ELMONT O'KEEFE LN. FORK AT 950' W OF STONEBROOK DR. 2 A AC/AC 3,411 32 109,152 8/22/2024 88 EMERAL LN01 EMERALD HILL LN. - EMERAL PROSPECT AVE. END 2 R AC/AC 450 22 10,900 8/28/2024 83 ESHNER CT01 ESHNER CT - ESHNER ALTAMONT RD END 2 R AC 381 22 8,382 8/27/2024 77 ESPERA DR01 ESPERANZA DR. - ESPERA CONCEPCION RD ESPERANZA DR 2 R AC 2,674 22 58,828 8/30/2024 66 ESTACA DR01 ESTACADA DR. - ESTACA MANUELLA RD. MIRANDA RD 2 R AC 1,015 28 28,420 8/29/2024 83 ESTACA WY01 ESTACADA WY. - ESTACA ESTACADA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 290 28 8,120 8/29/2024 80 FAWNCR CT01 FAWN CREEK CT. - FAWNCR PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 695 18 14,510 8/23/2024 74 FERNHI DR01 FERNHILL DR. - FERNHI CAMINO HERMOSO DR. END 2 R AC/AC 1,200 16 19,200 9/3/2024 78 FINN LN01 FINN LN. - FINN PROSPECT AVE. END 2 R AC 400 21 11,750 8/28/2024 82 FOOTHI LN01 FOOTHILL LN. - FOOTHI ELENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,014 23 23,322 9/4/2024 69 FRAMPT CT01 FRAMPTON CT. - FRAMPT MAGDALENA RD. END 2 R AC 240 20 7,300 9/3/2024 83 FRANCE AV01 FRANCEMONT DR. - FRANCE MOODY RD END 2 R AC 425 21 10,725 8/28/2024 85 FREMON LN01 FREMONT PINES LN. - FREMON FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 600 22 14,720 8/29/2024 71 FREMON RD01 FREMONT RD. - FREMON ARASTRADERO RD. ST. FRANCIS DR. 2 C AC/AC 3,620 30 108,600 8/29/2024 68 FREMON RD02 FREMONT RD. - FREMON ST. FRANCIS DR. CONCEPCION RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,250 25 31,250 8/29/2024 84 FREMON RD03A FREMONT RD. - FREMON CONCEPCION RD MANUELLA RD 2 C AC/AC 1,084 27 29,268 8/29/2024 81 FREMON RD03B FREMONT RD. - FREMON MANUELLA RD. MIRANDA RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,584 27 42,768 8/29/2024 81 FREMON RD04 FREMONT RD. - FREMON MIRANDA RD. WEST EDITH 2 C AC/AC 1,451 25 36,275 8/29/2024 77 FREMON RD05 FREMONT RD. - FREMON WEST EDITH BURKE RD. 2 C AC 2,254 24 54,096 8/29/2024 76 FREMON RD06 FREMONT RD. - FREMON BURKE RD. 600' south of BURKE RD. 2 C AC/AC 600 23 13,800 8/29/2024 95 GIGLI CT01 GIGLI CT. - GIGLI ELENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 430 18 9,070 9/4/2024 72 GOLDEN CT01 GOLDEN HILL CT. - GOLDEN LA PALOMA RD. END 2 R AC 750 20 15,000 9/1/2022 73 GREENH CT01 GREEN HILLS CT. - GREENH ELENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 540 16 9,140 8/15/2023 88 HARVAR CT01 HARVARD CT - HARVAR LIDDICOAT CR END 2 R AC/AC 295 17 5,015 8/23/2024 75 HIDDEN CT01 HIDDEN SPRING CT. - HIDDEN ALTAMONT RD. END 2 R AC 105 25 4,725 8/27/2024 75 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 2/5

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Street Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
HILLTO DR01 HILLTOP DR. - HILLTO BARLEY HILL RD. SUMMERHILL AVE. 2 R AC/AC 2,800 21 58,800 9/3/2024 66 HILLTO DR02 HILLTOP DR. - HILLTO BARLEY HILL RD END 2 R AC/AC 1,070 15 16,050 9/3/2024 72 HILLVI RD01 HILLVIEW RD. - HILLVI MAGDALENA RD. HILLTOP DR. 2 R AC 1,750 22 38,500 9/3/2024 81 HILPRK LN01 HILLPARK LN. - HILLPARK RAVENSBURY AVE END (BOTH CUL DE SACS) 2 R AC/AC 900 31 27,900 9/3/2024 94 HORSES CT01 HORSESHOE CT. - HORSES HORSESHOE LN. END 2 R AC/AC 465 18 9,670 8/29/2024 78 HORSES LN01 HORSESHOE LN. - HORSES ARASTRADERO RD. END 2 R AC/AC 828 22 18,216 8/29/2024 74 JESSIC LN01 JESSICA LN. - JESSIC DAWSON DR. END 2 R AC 470 18 9,960 9/3/2024 61 JULIET LN01 JULIETTA LN - JULIET SOUTH PROPERTY LINE OF 27340 JULIETTA LN END 2 R AC/AC 300 14 4,200 9/4/2024 77 KATE DR01 KATE DR. - KATE END EAST TERESA WY 2 R AC 840 20 19,300 9/4/2024 69 KATE DR02 KATE DR. - KATE TERESA WY LAURAL CT 2 R AC 540 22 11,880 9/4/2024 83 KINGLY WY01 KINGSLEY AVE. - KINGLY ALTA DENA DR END 2 R AC/AC 838 13 10,894 10/7/2024 100 LABARR RD01 LA BARRANCA RD - LABARR PURISSIMA RD ELENA RD 2 R AC/AC 2,080 22 45,760 8/15/2023 87 LACRES CT01 LA CRESTA CT. - LACRES LA CRESTA DR. END 2 R AC 870 21 19,070 8/28/2024 88 LACRES DR01 LA CRESTA DR. - LACRES ARASTRADERO RD. 900' south of NINA PL. 2 R AC/AC 2,700 20 54,000 8/15/2023 86 LACRES DR02 LA CRESTA DR. - LACRES 900' south of NINA PL. VISCAINO 2 R AC 2,650 23 60,950 8/28/2024 86 LACRES DR03 LA CRESTA DR. - LACRES VISCAINO END 2 R AC/AC 1,670 23 39,910 8/28/2024 89 LALANN CT01 LA LANNE CT. - LALANN MIRANDA END 2 R AC 919 21 19,299 8/29/2024 84 LALOMCT CT01 LA LOMA CT. - LALOM LA LOMA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 315 30 10,476 8/28/2024 87 LALOMDR DR01 LA LOMA DR. - LALOM PROSPECT AVE. SUMMITWOOD RD. 2 R AC/AC 1,495 28 41,860 8/28/2024 85 LALOMDR DR02 LA LOMA DR. - LALOM SUMMITWOOD DR. END 2 R AC/AC 2,114 18 38,052 8/28/2024 90 LAPALO RD01 LA PALOMA RD. - LAPALO FREMONT RD. NEWBRIDGE DR. 2 C AC/AC 2,315 22 50,930 8/30/2024 98 LAPALO RD02 LA PALOMA RD. - LAPALO NEWBRIDGE DR ALTA TIERRA RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,060 22 45,320 8/15/2023 81 LAPALO RD03 LA PALOMA RD. - LAPALO ALTA TIERRA RD. PURISSIMA RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,090 22 23,980 8/30/2024 91 LARENA LN01 LA RENA LN. - LARENA DIANNE DR. END 2 R AC/AC 1,200 23 27,600 8/22/2024 73 LAURAL CT01 LAURA CT - LAURAL END (S) END (N) 2 R AC 600 22 16,800 9/4/2024 82 LAUREL LN01 LAUREL LN. - LAUREL CONCEPCION RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 222 22 4,884 8/15/2023 89 LAVIDA RL01 LA VIDA REAL - LAVIDA NATOMA RD END 2 R AC 600 16 11,100 8/27/2024 81 LEANDE DR01 LEANDER DR. - LEANDE PURISSIMA RD. END 2 R AC 530 21 12,630 8/30/2024 69 LIDDIC CR01 LIDDICOAT CR - LIDDIC LIDDICOAT DR LIDDICOAT DR 2 R AC/AC 2,320 21 48,720 8/23/2024 78 LIDDIC DR01 LIDDICOAT DR - LIDDIC ARASTRADERO RD LIDDICOAT CR 2 R AC/AC 1,131 21 23,751 8/23/2024 55 LUPINE RD01 LUPINE RD. - LUPINE PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,179 22 25,938 8/23/2024 87 MAGDAL AV01 MAGDALENA RD. - MAGDAL CAMINO HERMOSA STONEBROOK 2 C AC/AC 3,800 23 87,400 9/3/2024 73 MAGDAL AV02 MAGDALENA RD. - MAGDAL STONEBROOK RAVENSBURY 2 C AC/AC 2,860 23 65,780 8/15/2023 82 MAGDAL AV03 MAGDALENA RD. - MAGDAL RAVENSBURY EASTBROOK 2 C AC/AC 1,550 26 40,300 9/3/2024 98 MANDOL DR01 MANDOLI DR. - MANDOL ARASTRADERO DR. END 2 R AC 585 21 23,385 8/29/2024 82 MANUEL RD01 MANUELLA RD. - MANUEL FREMONT ALICANTE 2 C AC/AC 965 23 22,195 8/29/2024 61 MANUEL RD02 MANUELLA RD. - MANUEL ALICANTE 400' north of SCARFF 2 C AC/AC 2,450 24 58,800 8/29/2024 66 MAPLEL CT01 MAPLE LEAF CT. - MAPLELEAF ELENA RD. CULDESAC 2 R AC 131 23 3,013 9/4/2024 81 MATADE CT01 MATADERO CREEK CT. - MATADE MATADERO CREEK LN. END 2 R AC/AC 650 20 15,080 8/23/2024 80 MATADE LN01 MATADERO CREEK LN. - MATADE PAGE MILL MATADERO CREEK CT. 2 R AC/AC 783 18 14,094 8/23/2024 72 MATADE LN02 MATADERO CREEK LN. - MATADE MATADERO CREEK CT. END 2 R AC/AC 1,461 16 23,376 8/23/2024 82 MELODY LN01 MELODY LN. - MELODY BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. END 2 R AC/AC 855 20 18,600 8/27/2024 85 MIDDLE LN01 MIDDLE FORK LN - MIDDLE THREE FORKS LN END 2 R AC/AC 1,018 18 18,324 9/4/2024 78 MIRAND CT01 MIRANDA CT. - MIRAND MIRANDA RD END 2 R AC/AC 265 23 7,920 8/29/2024 69 MIRAND RD01 MIRANDA RD. - MIRAND ESTACADA FREMONT RD. 2 R AC/AC 2,800 25 70,000 8/29/2024 80 MIRAND WY01 MIRANDA WY. - MIRAND MIRANDA RD. END 2 R AC 350 23 9,875 8/29/2024 83 MOODY RD01 MOODY RD. - MOODY ELENA RD. ALTAMONT RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,420 24 34,080 8/28/2024 81 MOODY RD02 MOODY RD. - MOODY ALTAMONT RD. FRANCEMONT AVE. 2 C AC/AC 2,620 23 60,260 8/28/2024 81 MOODY RD03 MOODY RD. - MOODY FRANCEMONT AVE. 570 W/O MURIETA LN. 2 C AC/AC 3,090 23 71,070 8/28/2024 70 MOODYS CT01 MOODY SPRINGS CT. - MOODYS MOODY RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 336 18 6,048 8/28/2024 61 MORA DR01 MORA DR. - MORA SAN ANTONIO OPEN SPACE E'LY PL OF 11120 MORA DR. 2 R AC 2,280 20 45,600 9/3/2024 81 MORAH WY01 MORA HEIGHTS WAY - MORAH MORA GLEN DR. END 2 R AC/AC 480 24 11,520 9/30/2024 100 MURIET LN01 MURIETTA LN. - MURIET MOODY RD. END 2 R AC/AC 870 18 17,660 8/28/2024 78 NATOMA RD01 NATOMA RD. - NATOMA ELENA RD. BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. 2 C AC/AC 3,000 21 63,000 8/27/2024 69 NATOMA RD02 NATOMA RD. - NATOMA BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. LUCERO LN. 2 C AC/AC 1,559 20 31,180 9/1/2022 86 NATOMA RD03 NATOMA RD. - NATOMA LUCERO LN. ALTAMONT RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,600 20 32,000 8/27/2024 74 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 3/5

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Street Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
NEWBRI DR01 NEWBRIDGE DR. - NEWBRI LA PALMOA BOTH ENDS 2 R AC/AC 780 24 23,792 8/30/2024 80 NINA PL01 NINA PL. - NINA LA CRESTA DR. END 2 R AC 785 23 19,165 8/28/2024 82 NORMAN LN01 NORMANDY LN. - NORMAN O'KEEFE LN. END 2 R AC/AC 730 25 19,250 8/22/2024 73 OAKKNO CR01 OAK KNOLL CIRCLE - OAKKNO STONEBROOK DR OAK KNOLL CIR 2 R AC 2,875 20 57,500 9/4/2024 81 OAKPAR CT01 OAK PARK CT. - OAKPAR OAK KNOLL CIRCLE END 2 R AC 1,040 20 22,800 9/4/2024 76 OHLONE LN01 OHLONE LN. - OHLONE FREMONT RD END 2 R AC 360 20 8,300 8/29/2024 88 OKEEFE LN01 OKEEFE LN. - OKEEFE 300' east of DIANE 343' east of VISTA SERENA 2 R AC 1,404 23 32,292 8/22/2024 75 OKEEFE LN02 OKEEFE LN. - OKEEFE 343' east of VISTA SERENA 350' west of VISTA SERENA 2 R AC 700 24 16,800 8/22/2024 85 OKEEFE LN03 OKEEFE LN. - OKEEFE 350' west of VISTA SERENA END 2 R AC 930 18 18,090 8/22/2024 93 OKEEFE LN04 OKEEFE LN. - OKEEFE EL MONTE 300' E/O DIANNE 2 R AC 1,410 26 36,660 8/22/2024 79 OLDALT RD01 OLD ALTOS RD. - OLDALT BURKE FREMONT 2 R AC/AC 550 18 9,900 9/1/2022 76 OLDPAG LN01 OLD PAGE MILL LN - OLDPAG PAGE MILL RD CUL DE SAC 2 R AC/AC 255 22 5,610 9/4/2024 53 OLDPAG RD01 OLD PAGE MILL RD - OLDPAGRD NORTH END OF BRIDGE (OFF PAGE MILL RD) HOUSE #2000 DRIVE-IN (CITY LIMIT) 2 R AC/AC 533 20 10,660 9/4/2024 95 OLDRLN LN01 OLD RANCH LN. - OLDRANCHL OLD RANCH RD END 2 R AC 403 33 13,299 9/3/2024 74 OLDRRD RD01 OLD RANCH RD. - OLDRANCHR RAVENSBURY RD. END 2 R AC 696 33 22,968 9/3/2024 92 OLIVEC CT01 OLIVE TREE CT. - OLIVEC OLIVE TREE LN. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 378 24 9,072 9/3/2024 90 OLIVEL LN01 OLIVE TREE LN. - OLIVEL BLANDOR WAY 200' W OF OLIVE TREE CT. (STREET #24740) 2 R AC/AC 1,287 24 30,888 9/3/2024 94 ONEONT DR01 ONEONTA DR. - ONEONT STONEBROOK DR. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 843 21 17,703 9/4/2024 87 ORCHAR LN01 ORCHARD HILL LN. - ORCHAR ROBLEDA RD END 2 R AC/AC 890 23 20,470 8/30/2024 87 ORTEGA DR01 ORTEGA DR. - ORTEGA ST. FRANCIS RD. END 2 R AC/AC 820 20 18,500 8/30/2024 83 PADRE CT01 PADRE CT. - PADRE ALTAMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 380 18 6,840 8/27/2024 99 PAGEMI RD00 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI 75 FT S. OF ARASTRADERO RD BERRY HILL CT 2 C AC/AC 645 60 38,700 8/23/2024 73 PAGEMI RD01 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI BERRY HILL BALERI RANCH RD. 2 C AC/AC 700 20 14,000 8/23/2024 85 PAGEMI RD02 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI BALERI RANCH RD. COUNTRY WY 2 C AC/AC 3,518 24 84,432 8/23/2024 84 PAGEMI RD03 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI COUNTRY WY MATADERO CREEK LN 2 C AC/AC 2,548 24 61,152 8/23/2024 72 PAGEMI RD04 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI MATADERO CREEK LN 935' north of ALTAMONT 2 C AC/AC 3,150 24 75,600 8/23/2024 84 PALOHI DR01 PALO HILLS DR. - PALOHI FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 720 20 16,400 8/29/2024 76 PALOPL PL01 PALOMINO PL - PALOPL NATOMA RD END 2 R AC 430 20 8,600 8/27/2024 83 PASEOD CT01 PASEO DEL ROBLE CT - PASEOD PASEO DEL ROBLE DR END 2 R AC/AC 250 16 4,000 8/23/2024 95 PASEOD DR01 PASEO DEL ROBLE DR. - PASEOD PAGE MILL RD. MIR MIROU DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,225 21 25,725 8/23/2024 91 PASEOD DR02 PASEO DEL ROBLE DR. - PASEOD MIR MIROU DR. PAGE MILL RD. 2 R AC/AC 2,520 20 50,400 8/23/2024 83 PRISCI LN01 PRISCILLA LN. - PRISCI STONEBROOK DR. BOTH ENDS 2 R AC 1,280 24 30,720 9/4/2024 71 PROSPE AV01 PROSPECT AVE. - PROSPE EDGECLIFF PL. STONEBROOK DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,875 24 45,000 8/28/2024 97 PURISS RD01 PURISSIMA RD. - PURISS ARASTRADERO RD. ELENA RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,351 23 54,073 8/22/2024 99 PURISS RD02 PURISSIMA RD. - PURISS ELENA RD. VISCAINO RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,660 22 36,520 8/22/2024 99 PURISS RD03 PURISSIMA RD. - PURISS VISCAINO RD. CONCEPCION RD. 2 C AC/AC 3,222 23 74,106 8/22/2024 99 PURISS RD04 PURISSIMA RD. - PURISS CONCEPCION RD. ROBLEDA RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,325 23 53,475 8/22/2024 72 RANCHO LN01 RANCHO MANUELLA LN. - RANCHO MANUELLA RD. END 2 R AC 510 16 8,160 8/29/2024 65 RAVENS AV01 RAVENSBURY AVE. - RAVENS MAGDALENA RD. HILLPARK LN. 2 A AC/AC 1,902 23 43,746 9/3/2024 95 RAVENS AV02 RAVENSBURY AVE. - RAVENS HILLPARK LN. END 2 A AC/AC 2,612 23 60,076 9/3/2024 83 REBECC LN01 REBECCA LN. - REBECC DAWSON DR. END 2 R AC/AC 900 18 16,200 9/3/2024 63 RHODA DR01 RHODA DR. - RHODA PURISSIMA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 734 22 16,148 8/28/2024 85 ROBLEA CT01 ROBLE ALTO CT - ROBLEA ROBLE ALTO DR END 2 R AC/AC 260 16 6,440 8/23/2024 83 ROBLEA DR01 ROBLE ALTO DR - ROBLEA PASEO DEL ROBLE DR END 2 R AC/AC 830 20 18,740 8/23/2024 64 ROBLEB CT01 ROBLE BLANCO CT - ROBLEB PASEO DEL ROBLE DR END 2 R AC/AC 900 21 18,900 8/23/2024 61 ROBLEC CT01 ROBLEDA CT. - ROBLEC ROBLEDA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 573 20 11,460 8/30/2024 99 ROBLED RD01 ROBLEDA RD. - ROBLED FREMONT CHAPIN 2 C AC/AC 3,325 22 73,150 8/30/2024 85 ROBLED RD02 ROBLEDA RD. - ROBLED CHAPIN ELENA 2 C AC 4,250 23 97,750 8/30/2024 78 ROBLEL RD01 ROBLE LADERA RD. - ROBLEL VISCAINO DR. PURISSIMA DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,840 23 42,320 9/1/2022 77 ROBLEV LN01 ROBLE VENENO LN. - ROBLEV CONCEPCION RD. END 2 R AC 330 22 7,760 8/28/2024 72 ROLLYR RD01 ROLLY RD. - ROLLY WEST LOYOLA 225' W/O KENBAR DR 2 R AC/AC 359 19 6,821 9/3/2024 85 ROLLYR RD02 ROLLY RD. - ROLLY 225' W/O KENBAR RD. KENBAR RD. 2 R AC/AC 225 19 4,275 9/3/2024 87 SADDLE CT01 SADDLE CT. - SADDLE SADDLE MOUNTAIN DR. END 2 R AC 970 17 17,360 8/28/2024 80 SADDLE DR01 SADDLE MOUNTAIN DR. - SADDLE STIRRUP WY. END 2 R AC 2,639 20 52,780 8/28/2024 70 SALTAM DR01 SALTAMONTES WY. - SALTAM ESTACADA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 692 30 20,760 8/29/2024 75 SAM LN01 SAMUEL LN. - SAMUEL PURISSIMA END 2 R AC/AC 220 20 4,400 8/28/2024 83 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 4/5

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Street Name
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
SCARFF WY01 SCARFF WY - SCARFW MANUELLA RD END 2 R AC/AC 320 20 6,400 8/29/2024 64 SEVENA LN01 SEVEN ACRES LN. - SEVENA FREMONT END 2 R AC/AC 310 21 7,860 8/29/2024 85 SHOLES CT01 SHOLES CT. - SHOLES ALEXANDER DR. END 2 R AC/AC 405 18 8,590 9/1/2022 89 SNELL LN01 SNELL LN. - SNELL FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 840 22 20,280 8/29/2024 99 SPRING DR01 SPRINGHILL DR. - SPRING MANUELLA RD. END 2 R AC 320 22 7,040 8/30/2024 71 STANFO CT01 STANFORD CT - STANFO LIDDICOAT CR END 2 R AC/AC 540 16 11,640 8/23/2024 53 STFRAN RD01 ST. FRANCIS RD. - STFRAN LA CRESTA DR. ASCENSION DR. 2 R AC/AC 2,660 29 77,140 8/30/2024 78 STFRAN RD02 ST. FRANCIS RD. - STFRAN ASCENSION DR. FREMONT RD. 2 R AC/AC 481 52 25,012 8/30/2024 73 STIRRU WY01 STIRRUP WY. - STIRRU SADDLE MOUNTAIN RD. END 2 R AC 820 17 16,140 8/28/2024 68 STIRRU WY02 STIRRUP WY - STIRRU ARASTRADERO RD. SADDLE MOUNTAIN RD. 2 R AC 367 21 7,707 8/28/2024 77 STONEB CT01 STONEBROOK CT - STONEB STONEBROOK DR END 2 R AC/AC 770 19 14,630 9/4/2024 76 STONEB DR01 STONEBROOK DR. - STONEB EL MONTE AVE. S/O PROSPECT AVE. 2 C AC/AC 2,390 24 57,360 9/4/2024 80 STONEB DR02 STONEBROOK DR. - STONEB S. of PROSPECT AVE. TERESA WY. 2 C AC 1,350 23 31,050 9/4/2024 77 STORYH LN01 STORY HILL LN. - STORYH PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,603 18 28,854 8/23/2024 90 SUMMER AV01 SUMMERHILL AVE - SUMMER EL MONTE RD Nicole Lane (Southbound Only) 2 C AC/AC 900 16 14,400 8/22/2024 76 SUMMIT RDO1 SUMMITWOOD RD. - SUMMIT TEPA WY LA LOMA DR 2 R AC/AC 2,335 21 49,035 8/28/2024 89 SUNHIL DR01 SUNHILLS DR. - SUNHILLS WEST LOYOLA 245' S/O WEST LAYOLA 2 R AC/AC 245 22 5,390 9/3/2024 75 SUNHIL DR02 SUNHILLS DR. - SUNHIL MORA DR. 245' S OF WEST LOYOLA DR. 2 R AC/AC 700 22 15,400 9/3/2024 79 SUNSET DR01 SUNSET DR EAST - SUNSET BURKE RD END 2 R AC/AC 1,550 15 23,250 8/30/2024 35 TAAFFE RD01 TAAFFE RD. - TAAFFE ELENA RD. DEZAHARA WAY 2 C AC/AC 3,240 20 64,800 8/27/2024 92 TAAFFE RD02A TAAFFE RD. - TAAFFE DEZAHARA WAY (N.) DEZAHARA WAY (S.) 2 C AC/AC 1,082 20 21,640 8/27/2024 80 TAAFFE RD02B TAAFFE RD. - TAAFFE DEZEHARA WAY (S.) ALTAMONT RD. 2 C AC/AC 370 20 7,400 8/27/2024 80 TEMPLE PL01 TEMPLETON PL. - TEMPLE FREMONT RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC 298 21 6,258 8/29/2024 83 TEPA WY00 TEPA WY. - TEPA MOODY RD SUMMITWOOD RD 2 R AC/AC 860 32 27,520 8/28/2024 83 TEPA WY01 TEPA WY. - TEPA SUMMITWOOD RD END 2 R AC/AC 630 28 17,640 8/28/2024 69 TERESA WY01 TERESA WY. - TERESA STONEBROOK DR KATE DR 2 R AC 250 22 5,500 9/4/2024 73 THREEF LN01 THREE FORKS LN - THREEF COUNTRY WY SOUTH FORKS LN 2 R AC/AC 600 20 12,000 8/23/2024 99 TODD LN01 TODD LN. - TODD LA PALOMA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 814 21 17,094 8/30/2024 83 TORELL LN01 TORELLO LN. - TORELL MANUELLA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 400 17 6,800 8/29/2024 95 TRACY CT01 TRACY CT. - TRACY ARASTRADERO END 2 R AC/AC 265 20 5,500 8/23/2024 85 TRIPOL CT01 TRIPOLI CT. - TRIPOL NATOMA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 250 16 4,000 8/27/2024 85 TWINOA CT01 TWIN OAKS CT. - TWINOA ARASTRADERO RD. END 2 R AC 125 22 2,750 8/28/2024 88 URSULA LN01 URSULA LN. - URSULA BLACK MOUNTAIN END 2 R AC/AC 600 20 14,000 8/27/2024 85 VIACER GO01 VIA CERRO GORDO - VIACER BRIONES WY END 2 R AC/AC 710 18 14,280 8/23/2024 95 VIACOR WY01 VIA CORITA WY. - VIACOR NATOMA END 2 R AC/AC 355 20 7,100 8/27/2024 90 VIAFEL FE01 VIA FELIZ - VIAFEL PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC 1,480 20 29,600 11/1/2024 82 VIAVEN WY01 VIA VENTANA WY - VIAVEN PAGE MILL RD BRIONES WY 2 R AC/AC 1,610 18 28,980 8/23/2024 92 VIAVEN WY02 VIA VENTANA WY - VIAVEN BRIONES WY END 2 R AC/AC 452 18 8,136 8/23/2024 93 VISCAI CT01 VISCAINO CT. - VISCAI VISCAINO RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,100 20 23,400 8/28/2024 95 VISCAI PL01 VISCAINO PL. - VISCAI VISCAINO RD END 2 R AC/AC 360 24 9,150 9/4/2024 76 VISCAI RD01 VISCAINO RD. - VISCAI PURISSIMA RD. CONCEPCION RD. 2 R AC/AC 3,456 23 79,488 8/28/2024 77 VISTAD CT01 VISTA DEL VALLE CT. - VISTAD TAAFFE END 2 R AC/AC 360 23 9,280 8/27/2024 83 VISTAS SE01 VISTA SERENA - VISTAS O'KEEFE LN. END 1 R AC/AC 750 19 14,250 8/22/2024 81 VOGUEC CT01 VOGUE CT. - VOGUEC BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. END 2 R AC/AC 570 21 11,970 8/27/2024 80 VOORHE DR01 VOORHEES DR. - VOORHE EL MONTE RD. 800 S. OF EL MONTE RD. 2 R AC/AC 800 25 21,700 8/22/2024 80 WESTON DR01 WESTON DR. - WESTON FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 891 23 20,493 8/29/2024 69 WESTWI WY01 WESTWIND WY - WESTWI CONCEPCION RD LA PALOMA RD 2 R AC/AC 1,070 22 23,540 8/30/2024 77 WILDPL LN01 WILD PLUM LN. - WILDPL MIRANDA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 650 20 14,500 8/29/2024 61 WILLOW LN01 WILLOW POND LN. - WILLOW TEPA WAY END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 632 21 13,272 8/28/2024 83 WINDSO CT01 WINDSOR CT. - WINDSO BLACK MOUNTAIN END 2 R AC/AC 205 22 5,510 8/28/2024 90 WLOYO DR01 WEST LOYOLA DR. - WLOYOLA CAMINO HERMOSA HWY280 (EASTBROOK) 2 A AC/AC 4,762 21 100,002 9/1/2022 84 YALE CT01 YALE CT - YALE LIDDICOAT CR END 2 R AC/AC 130 16 4,280 9/4/2024 82 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 5/5

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Section Description Inventory – Sorted by Descending PCI

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Descending PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
KINGLY WY01 KINGSLEY AVE. - KINGLY ALTA DENA DR END 2 R AC/AC 838 13 10,894 10/7/2024 100 MORAH WY01 MORA HEIGHTS WAY - MORAH MORA GLEN DR. END 2 R AC/AC 480 24 11,520 9/30/2024 100 DAWN LN01 DAWN LN. - DAWN ELENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 400 22 9,300 9/4/2024 99 DEZAH WY01 DEZAHAZA WY - DEZAH TAAFFE RD. TAAFFE RD. 2 R AC/AC 1,700 18 30,600 8/27/2024 99 PADRE CT01 PADRE CT. - PADRE ALTAMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 380 18 6,840 8/27/2024 99 PURISS RD01 PURISSIMA RD. - PURISS ARASTRADERO RD. ELENA RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,351 23 54,073 8/22/2024 99 PURISS RD02 PURISSIMA RD. - PURISS ELENA RD. VISCAINO RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,660 22 36,520 8/22/2024 99 PURISS RD03 PURISSIMA RD. - PURISS VISCAINO RD. CONCEPCION RD. 2 C AC/AC 3,222 23 74,106 8/22/2024 99 ROBLEC CT01 ROBLEDA CT. - ROBLEC ROBLEDA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 573 20 11,460 8/30/2024 99 SNELL LN01 SNELL LN. - SNELL FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 840 22 20,280 8/29/2024 99 THREEF LN01 THREE FORKS LN - THREEF COUNTRY WY SOUTH FORKS LN 2 R AC/AC 600 20 12,000 8/23/2024 99 BLANDO WY01 BLANDOR WY - BLANDO OLIVE TREE LN. MAGDALENA RD. 2 R AC/AC 850 24 20,400 9/3/2024 98 CARILL LN01 CARILLO LN. - CARILL LA CRESTA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 450 20 9,800 8/28/2024 98 DELSON CT01 DELSON CT - DELSON ELENA RD END 2 R AC/AC 330 30 9,900 9/4/2024 98 ELMONT RD02 EL MONTE RD. (EB) - ELMONT FORK AT 950' W OF STONEBROOK DR. SUMMERHILL 2 A AC/AC 3,851 33 127,083 8/22/2024 98 LAPALO RD01 LA PALOMA RD. - LAPALO FREMONT RD. NEWBRIDGE DR. 2 C AC/AC 2,315 22 50,930 8/30/2024 98 MAGDAL AV03 MAGDALENA RD. - MAGDAL RAVENSBURY EASTBROOK 2 C AC/AC 1,550 26 40,300 9/3/2024 98 PROSPE AV01 PROSPECT AVE. - PROSPE EDGECLIFF PL. STONEBROOK DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,875 24 45,000 8/28/2024 97 DEERFI DR01 DEERFIELD DR. - DEERFI FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 700 20 14,000 8/29/2024 96 ANACAP DR01 ANACAPA DR. - ANACAP ASCENSION DR. ST. FRANCIS RD. 2 R AC 1,854 28 51,912 8/28/2024 95 ARASTR RD02 ARASTRADERO RD. - ARASTR PAGE MILL RD. TOWN LIMIT 2 A AC/AC 1,430 34 48,620 8/23/2024 95 BALERI RD01 BALERI RANCH RD. - BALERI BALERI RANCH RD. NORTH END 2 R AC/AC 250 16 5,000 8/23/2024 95 BALERI RD02 BALERI RANCH RD. - BALERI BALERI RANCH RD. SOUTH END 2 R AC/AC 260 16 5,160 8/23/2024 95 BALERI RD03 BALERI RANCH RD. - BALERI PAGE MILL RD. BALERI RANCH RD. 2 R AC/AC 365 16 5,840 8/23/2024 95 BLACKM RD01 BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. - BLACKM ALTAMONT RD. NATOMA RD. 2 R AC/AC 2,816 22 61,952 8/27/2024 95 BYRD LN01 BYRD LN. - BYRD NATOMA RD. END 2 R AC 920 24 23,080 8/27/2024 95 DEERSP WY01 DEER SPRINGS WY. - DEERSP BYRNE PARK LN. 1ST BULB 2 R AC/AC 970 18 18,987 8/27/2024 95 EDGERT RD01 EDGERTON RD - EDGERT BLACK MOUNTAIN RD END 2 R AC/AC 1,800 21 37,800 8/28/2024 95 FREMON RD06 FREMONT RD. - FREMON BURKE RD. 600' south of BURKE RD. 2 C AC/AC 600 23 13,800 8/29/2024 95 OLDPAG RD01 OLD PAGE MILL RD - OLDPAGRD NORTH END OF BRIDGE (OFF PAGE MILL RD) HOUSE #2000 DRIVE-IN (CITY LIMIT) 2 R AC/AC 533 20 10,660 9/4/2024 95 PASEOD CT01 PASEO DEL ROBLE CT - PASEOD PASEO DEL ROBLE DR END 2 R AC/AC 250 16 4,000 8/23/2024 95 RAVENS AV01 RAVENSBURY AVE. - RAVENS MAGDALENA RD. HILLPARK LN. 2 A AC/AC 1,902 23 43,746 9/3/2024 95 TORELL LN01 TORELLO LN. - TORELL MANUELLA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 400 17 6,800 8/29/2024 95 VIACER GO01 VIA CERRO GORDO - VIACER BRIONES WY END 2 R AC/AC 710 18 14,280 8/23/2024 95 VISCAI CT01 VISCAINO CT. - VISCAI VISCAINO RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,100 20 23,400 8/28/2024 95 ALTAMO RD04 ALTAMONT RD. - ALTAMO CORBETTA LN. MOODY RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,226 23 51,198 8/27/2024 94 HILPRK LN01 HILLPARK LN. - HILLPARK RAVENSBURY AVE END (BOTH CUL DE SACS) 2 R AC/AC 900 31 27,900 9/3/2024 94 OLIVEL LN01 OLIVE TREE LN. - OLIVEL BLANDOR WAY 200' W OF OLIVE TREE CT. (STREET #24740) 2 R AC/AC 1,287 24 30,888 9/3/2024 94 ALTAMO RD03 ALTAMONT RD. - ALTAMO TAAFFE RD. CORBETTA LN. 2 C AC/AC 3,709 23 85,307 8/27/2024 93 ALTATI RD01 ALTA TIERRA RD. - ALTATI ROBLEDA RD LA PALOMA RD 2 R AC/AC 1,610 17 27,370 8/30/2024 93 BYRNEP LN01 BYRNE PARK LN. - BYRNEP ALTAMONT RD. W'LY PL OF 27269 BYRNE PARK LN. 2 R AC/AC 1,200 22 26,400 8/27/2024 93 OKEEFE LN03 OKEEFE LN. - OKEEFE 350' west of VISTA SERENA END 2 R AC 930 18 18,090 8/22/2024 93 VIAVEN WY02 VIA VENTANA WY - VIAVEN BRIONES WY END 2 R AC/AC 452 18 8,136 8/23/2024 93 CAMINO DR01 CAMINO HERMOSO - CAMINO RAVENSBURY AVE. (NORTH) RAVENSBURY AVE. (SOUTH) 2 A AC/AC 3,190 20 63,800 9/3/2024 92 OLDRRD RD01 OLD RANCH RD. - OLDRANCHR RAVENSBURY RD. END 2 R AC 696 33 22,968 9/3/2024 92 TAAFFE RD01 TAAFFE RD. - TAAFFE ELENA RD. DEZAHARA WAY 2 C AC/AC 3,240 20 64,800 8/27/2024 92 VIAVEN WY01 VIA VENTANA WY - VIAVEN PAGE MILL RD BRIONES WY 2 R AC/AC 1,610 18 28,980 8/23/2024 92 ELENA RD02 ELENA RD. - ELENA NATOMA RD. LA BARRANCA RD. 2 C AC/AC 3,000 23 69,000 8/22/2024 91 LAPALO RD03 LA PALOMA RD. - LAPALO ALTA TIERRA RD. PURISSIMA RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,090 22 23,980 8/30/2024 91 PASEOD DR01 PASEO DEL ROBLE DR. - PASEOD PAGE MILL RD. MIR MIROU DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,225 21 25,725 8/23/2024 91 ALEXAN PL01 ALEXANDER PL - ALEXAN FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,150 18 22,700 8/29/2024 90 ANACAP CT01 ANACAPA CT. - ANACAP ANACAPA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 140 30 4,750 8/28/2024 90 LALOMDR DR02 LA LOMA DR. - LALOM SUMMITWOOD DR. END 2 R AC/AC 2,114 18 38,052 8/28/2024 90 OLIVEC CT01 OLIVE TREE CT. - OLIVEC OLIVE TREE LN. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 378 24 9,072 9/3/2024 90 STORYH LN01 STORY HILL LN. - STORYH PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,603 18 28,854 8/23/2024 90 VIACOR WY01 VIA CORITA WY. - VIACOR NATOMA END 2 R AC/AC 355 20 7,100 8/27/2024 90 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 1/5

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Descending PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
WINDSO CT01 WINDSOR CT. - WINDSO BLACK MOUNTAIN END 2 R AC/AC 205 22 5,510 8/28/2024 90 ALEJAN DR02 ALEJANDRO DR. - ALEJAN ST. FRANCIS RD. END (NORTH) 2 R AC 294 21 6,174 8/30/2024 89 BERKSH DR01 BERKSHIRE DR. - BERKSHIRE WEST LOYOLA (S) WEST LOYOLA (E) 2 R AC/AC 1,855 18 33,390 9/3/2024 89 LACRES DR03 LA CRESTA DR. - LACRES VISCAINO END 2 R AC/AC 1,670 23 39,910 8/28/2024 89 LAUREL LN01 LAUREL LN. - LAUREL CONCEPCION RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 222 22 4,884 8/15/2023 89 SHOLES CT01 SHOLES CT. - SHOLES ALEXANDER DR. END 2 R AC/AC 405 18 8,590 9/1/2022 89 SUMMIT RDO1 SUMMITWOOD RD. - SUMMIT TEPA WY LA LOMA DR 2 R AC/AC 2,335 21 49,035 8/28/2024 89 ALTAMO RD01 ALTAMONT RD. - ALTAMO PAGE MILL RD. BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,592 21 54,432 8/27/2024 88 BLEDSO CT01 BLEDSOE CT. - BLEDSO MOODY RD. END 2 R AC 105 35 5,075 8/28/2024 88 ELMONT RD03 EL MONTE RD. (WB) - ELMONT O'KEEFE LN. FORK AT 950' W OF STONEBROOK DR. 2 A AC/AC 3,411 32 109,152 8/22/2024 88 GREENH CT01 GREEN HILLS CT. - GREENH ELENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 540 16 9,140 8/15/2023 88 LACRES CT01 LA CRESTA CT. - LACRES LA CRESTA DR. END 2 R AC 870 21 19,070 8/28/2024 88 OHLONE LN01 OHLONE LN. - OHLONE FREMONT RD END 2 R AC 360 20 8,300 8/29/2024 88 TWINOA CT01 TWIN OAKS CT. - TWINOA ARASTRADERO RD. END 2 R AC 125 22 2,750 8/28/2024 88 ADOBE LN01 ADOBE LN. - ADOBE TEPA WAY END 2 R AC/AC 1,290 34 47,162 8/28/2024 87 ALEJAN DR01 ALEJANDRO DR. - ALEJAN ST.FRANCIS RD. END (SOUTH) 2 R AC/AC 393 20 7,860 8/15/2023 87 ASCENS DR02 ASCENSION DR. - ASCENS ANACAPA DR. ST. FRANCIS DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,601 27 43,227 8/28/2024 87 CAMINO ME01 CAMINO MEDIO - CAMINO VISCAINO RD. END 2 R AC 501 24 12,024 8/28/2024 87 CANARI WY01 CANARIO WY. - CANARI VISCAINO RD. END 2 R AC 950 22 21,900 8/15/2023 87 CONCEP RD01 CONCEPTION RD. - CONCEP FREMONT RD. PURISSIMA RD. 2 C AC/AC 4,604 20 92,080 8/30/2024 87 LABARR RD01 LA BARRANCA RD - LABARR PURISSIMA RD ELENA RD 2 R AC/AC 2,080 22 45,760 8/15/2023 87 LALOMCT CT01 LA LOMA CT. - LALOM LA LOMA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 315 30 10,476 8/28/2024 87 LUPINE RD01 LUPINE RD. - LUPINE PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,179 22 25,938 8/23/2024 87 ONEONT DR01 ONEONTA DR. - ONEONT STONEBROOK DR. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 843 21 17,703 9/4/2024 87 ORCHAR LN01 ORCHARD HILL LN. - ORCHAR ROBLEDA RD END 2 R AC/AC 890 23 20,470 8/30/2024 87 ROLLYR RD02 ROLLY RD. - ROLLY 225' W/O KENBAR RD. KENBAR RD. 2 R AC/AC 225 19 4,275 9/3/2024 87 LACRES DR01 LA CRESTA DR. - LACRES ARASTRADERO RD. 900' south of NINA PL. 2 R AC/AC 2,700 20 54,000 8/15/2023 86 LACRES DR02 LA CRESTA DR. - LACRES 900' south of NINA PL. VISCAINO 2 R AC 2,650 23 60,950 8/28/2024 86 NATOMA RD02 NATOMA RD. - NATOMA BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. LUCERO LN. 2 C AC/AC 1,559 20 31,180 9/1/2022 86 ALBERT LN01 ALBERTSWORTH LN. - ALBERT MAGDALENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 400 27 10,800 9/3/2024 85 ARASTR RD01 ARASTRADERO RD. - ARASTR HORSESHOE LN. STIRRUP WY. 2 A AC/AC 1,900 40 76,000 9/1/2022 85 DAWNRI DR01 DAWNRIDGE DR. - DAWNRI MAGDALENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,908 31 59,148 9/3/2024 85 DEERCR LN01 DEER CREEK LN - DEERCR PURISSIMA ROAD CUL DE SAC/PRIVATE ROAD 2 R AC 585 21 12,285 8/28/2024 85 FRANCE AV01 FRANCEMONT DR. - FRANCE MOODY RD END 2 R AC 425 21 10,725 8/28/2024 85 LALOMDR DR01 LA LOMA DR. - LALOM PROSPECT AVE. SUMMITWOOD RD. 2 R AC/AC 1,495 28 41,860 8/28/2024 85 MELODY LN01 MELODY LN. - MELODY BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. END 2 R AC/AC 855 20 18,600 8/27/2024 85 OKEEFE LN02 OKEEFE LN. - OKEEFE 343' east of VISTA SERENA 350' west of VISTA SERENA 2 R AC 700 24 16,800 8/22/2024 85 PAGEMI RD01 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI BERRY HILL BALERI RANCH RD. 2 C AC/AC 700 20 14,000 8/23/2024 85 RHODA DR01 RHODA DR. - RHODA PURISSIMA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 734 22 16,148 8/28/2024 85 ROBLED RD01 ROBLEDA RD. - ROBLED FREMONT CHAPIN 2 C AC/AC 3,325 22 73,150 8/30/2024 85 ROLLYR RD01 ROLLY RD. - ROLLY WEST LOYOLA 225' W/O KENBAR DR 2 R AC/AC 359 19 6,821 9/3/2024 85 SEVENA LN01 SEVEN ACRES LN. - SEVENA FREMONT END 2 R AC/AC 310 21 7,860 8/29/2024 85 TRACY CT01 TRACY CT. - TRACY ARASTRADERO END 2 R AC/AC 265 20 5,500 8/23/2024 85 TRIPOL CT01 TRIPOLI CT. - TRIPOL NATOMA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 250 16 4,000 8/27/2024 85 URSULA LN01 URSULA LN. - URSULA BLACK MOUNTAIN END 2 R AC/AC 600 20 14,000 8/27/2024 85 BEATRI LN01 BEATRICE LN. - BEATRI ROBLEDA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC 245 22 5,390 8/15/2023 84 CONEJO CT01 CONEJO CT. - CONEJO ASCENSION DR. END 2 R AC/AC 310 18 6,315 8/15/2023 84 ELMONT RD01 EL MONTE RD. - ELMONT MOODY RD. FORK AT 950' W OF STONEBROOK DR. 2 A AC/AC 1,890 36 68,040 8/22/2024 84 FREMON RD02 FREMONT RD. - FREMON ST. FRANCIS DR. CONCEPCION RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,250 25 31,250 8/29/2024 84 LALANN CT01 LA LANNE CT. - LALANN MIRANDA END 2 R AC 919 21 19,299 8/29/2024 84 PAGEMI RD02 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI BALERI RANCH RD. COUNTRY WY 2 C AC/AC 3,518 24 84,432 8/23/2024 84 PAGEMI RD04 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI MATADERO CREEK LN 935' north of ALTAMONT 2 C AC/AC 3,150 24 75,600 8/23/2024 84 WLOYO DR01 WEST LOYOLA DR. - WLOYOLA CAMINO HERMOSA HWY280 (EASTBROOK) 2 A AC/AC 4,762 21 100,002 9/1/2022 84 ALEXIS DR01 ALEXIS DR. - ALEXIS PAGE MILL RD. TOWN LIMIT 2 R AC/AC 554 23 12,742 8/23/2024 83 BEAVER LN01 BEAVER LN. - BEAVER LA CRESTA DR. END 2 R AC 465 23 11,795 8/28/2024 83 BERRYH CT01 BERRY HILL CT. - BERYHC PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 547 18 9,846 8/23/2024 83 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 2/5

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Descending PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
CHRIST LN01 CHRISTOPHER'S LN. - CHRIST PAGE MILL RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 1,730 23 39,790 9/4/2024 83 DONELS PL01 DONELSON PL. - DONELS FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 630 19 13,270 8/29/2024 83 EMERAL LN01 EMERALD HILL LN. - EMERAL PROSPECT AVE. END 2 R AC/AC 450 22 10,900 8/28/2024 83 ESTACA DR01 ESTACADA DR. - ESTACA MANUELLA RD. MIRANDA RD 2 R AC 1,015 28 28,420 8/29/2024 83 FRAMPT CT01 FRAMPTON CT. - FRAMPT MAGDALENA RD. END 2 R AC 240 20 7,300 9/3/2024 83 KATE DR02 KATE DR. - KATE TERESA WY LAURAL CT 2 R AC 540 22 11,880 9/4/2024 83 MIRAND WY01 MIRANDA WY. - MIRAND MIRANDA RD. END 2 R AC 350 23 9,875 8/29/2024 83 ORTEGA DR01 ORTEGA DR. - ORTEGA ST. FRANCIS RD. END 2 R AC/AC 820 20 18,500 8/30/2024 83 PALOPL PL01 PALOMINO PL - PALOPL NATOMA RD END 2 R AC 430 20 8,600 8/27/2024 83 PASEOD DR02 PASEO DEL ROBLE DR. - PASEOD MIR MIROU DR. PAGE MILL RD. 2 R AC/AC 2,520 20 50,400 8/23/2024 83 RAVENS AV02 RAVENSBURY AVE. - RAVENS HILLPARK LN. END 2 A AC/AC 2,612 23 60,076 9/3/2024 83 ROBLEA CT01 ROBLE ALTO CT - ROBLEA ROBLE ALTO DR END 2 R AC/AC 260 16 6,440 8/23/2024 83 SAM LN01 SAMUEL LN. - SAMUEL PURISSIMA END 2 R AC/AC 220 20 4,400 8/28/2024 83 TEMPLE PL01 TEMPLETON PL. - TEMPLE FREMONT RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC 298 21 6,258 8/29/2024 83 TEPA WY00 TEPA WY. - TEPA MOODY RD SUMMITWOOD RD 2 R AC/AC 860 32 27,520 8/28/2024 83 TODD LN01 TODD LN. - TODD LA PALOMA RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 814 21 17,094 8/30/2024 83 VISTAD CT01 VISTA DEL VALLE CT. - VISTAD TAAFFE END 2 R AC/AC 360 23 9,280 8/27/2024 83 WILLOW LN01 WILLOW POND LN. - WILLOW TEPA WAY END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 632 21 13,272 8/28/2024 83 ADOBEC RD01 ADOBE CREEK LODGE RD. - ADOBECR MOODY RD END 2 R AC 560 21 15,360 8/28/2024 82 BRIONC CT01 BRIONES CT. - BRIONC BRIONES WAY END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 486 20 9,720 8/23/2024 82 CATHAR CT01 CATHARINE CT - CATHAR DONELSON PL. END 2 R AC/AC 480 18 9,940 8/29/2024 82 DEBELL DR01 DEBELL DR. - DEBELL MANUELLA RD ESTACADA DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,739 34 59,126 8/29/2024 82 FINN LN01 FINN LN. - FINN PROSPECT AVE. END 2 R AC 400 21 11,750 8/28/2024 82 LAURAL CT01 LAURA CT - LAURAL END (S) END (N) 2 R AC 600 22 16,800 9/4/2024 82 MAGDAL AV02 MAGDALENA RD. - MAGDAL STONEBROOK RAVENSBURY 2 C AC/AC 2,860 23 65,780 8/15/2023 82 MANDOL DR01 MANDOLI DR. - MANDOL ARASTRADERO DR. END 2 R AC 585 21 23,385 8/29/2024 82 MATADE LN02 MATADERO CREEK LN. - MATADE MATADERO CREEK CT. END 2 R AC/AC 1,461 16 23,376 8/23/2024 82 NINA PL01 NINA PL. - NINA LA CRESTA DR. END 2 R AC 785 23 19,165 8/28/2024 82 VIAFEL FE01 VIA FELIZ - VIAFEL PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC 1,480 20 29,600 11/1/2024 82 YALE CT01 YALE CT - YALE LIDDICOAT CR END 2 R AC/AC 130 16 4,280 9/4/2024 82 ALTADE DR01 ALTADENA DR. - ALTADE MANUELLA RD. KINGSLEY AVE 2 R AC/AC 490 18 8,820 8/29/2024 81 ASCENS DR01 ASCENSION DR. - ASCENS ST. FRANCIS RD. END 2 R AC 630 19 12,970 8/30/2024 81 ATHERT CT01 ATHERTON CT. - ATHERT ROBLEDA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 600 22 13,200 8/30/2024 81 BYRNEP LN02 BYRNE PARK LN. - BYRNEP W'LY PL OF 27269 BYRNE PARK LN. END 2 R AC/AC 410 22 9,020 8/27/2024 81 CLAUSE CT01 CLAUSEN CT. - CLAUSE VOORHEES DR. END 2 R AC 375 24 10,055 8/22/2024 81 COUNTR WY01 COUNTRY WY. - COUNTR PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,330 16 21,780 8/23/2024 81 FREMON RD03A FREMONT RD. - FREMON CONCEPCION RD MANUELLA RD 2 C AC/AC 1,084 27 29,268 8/29/2024 81 FREMON RD03B FREMONT RD. - FREMON MANUELLA RD. MIRANDA RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,584 27 42,768 8/29/2024 81 HILLVI RD01 HILLVIEW RD. - HILLVI MAGDALENA RD. HILLTOP DR. 2 R AC 1,750 22 38,500 9/3/2024 81 LAPALO RD02 LA PALOMA RD. - LAPALO NEWBRIDGE DR ALTA TIERRA RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,060 22 45,320 8/15/2023 81 LAVIDA RL01 LA VIDA REAL - LAVIDA NATOMA RD END 2 R AC 600 16 11,100 8/27/2024 81 MAPLEL CT01 MAPLE LEAF CT. - MAPLELEAF ELENA RD. CULDESAC 2 R AC 131 23 3,013 9/4/2024 81 MOODY RD01 MOODY RD. - MOODY ELENA RD. ALTAMONT RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,420 24 34,080 8/28/2024 81 MOODY RD02 MOODY RD. - MOODY ALTAMONT RD. FRANCEMONT AVE. 2 C AC/AC 2,620 23 60,260 8/28/2024 81 MORA DR01 MORA DR. - MORA SAN ANTONIO OPEN SPACE E'LY PL OF 11120 MORA DR. 2 R AC 2,280 20 45,600 9/3/2024 81 OAKKNO CR01 OAK KNOLL CIRCLE - OAKKNO STONEBROOK DR OAK KNOLL CIR 2 R AC 2,875 20 57,500 9/4/2024 81 VISTAS SE01 VISTA SERENA - VISTAS O'KEEFE LN. END 1 R AC/AC 750 19 14,250 8/22/2024 81 ANACAP DR02 ANACAPA DR. - ANACAP VISCAINO RD ASCENSION DR. 2 R AC 1,300 25 32,500 8/28/2024 80 ARROYO DR01 ARROYO OAKS DR. - ARROYO RAVENSBURY AVE. END 2 R AC 565 20 11,300 9/3/2024 80 ESTACA WY01 ESTACADA WY. - ESTACA ESTACADA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 290 28 8,120 8/29/2024 80 MATADE CT01 MATADERO CREEK CT. - MATADE MATADERO CREEK LN. END 2 R AC/AC 650 20 15,080 8/23/2024 80 MIRAND RD01 MIRANDA RD. - MIRAND ESTACADA FREMONT RD. 2 R AC/AC 2,800 25 70,000 8/29/2024 80 NEWBRI DR01 NEWBRIDGE DR. - NEWBRI LA PALMOA BOTH ENDS 2 R AC/AC 780 24 23,792 8/30/2024 80 SADDLE CT01 SADDLE CT. - SADDLE SADDLE MOUNTAIN DR. END 2 R AC 970 17 17,360 8/28/2024 80 STONEB DR01 STONEBROOK DR. - STONEB EL MONTE AVE. S/O PROSPECT AVE. 2 C AC/AC 2,390 24 57,360 9/4/2024 80 TAAFFE RD02A TAAFFE RD. - TAAFFE DEZAHARA WAY (N.) DEZAHARA WAY (S.) 2 C AC/AC 1,082 20 21,640 8/27/2024 80 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 3/5

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Descending PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
TAAFFE RD02B TAAFFE RD. - TAAFFE DEZEHARA WAY (S.) ALTAMONT RD. 2 C AC/AC 370 20 7,400 8/27/2024 80 VOGUEC CT01 VOGUE CT. - VOGUEC BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. END 2 R AC/AC 570 21 11,970 8/27/2024 80 VOORHE DR01 VOORHEES DR. - VOORHE EL MONTE RD. 800 S. OF EL MONTE RD. 2 R AC/AC 800 25 21,700 8/22/2024 80 ADONNA CT01 ADONNA CT - ADONNA ELENA RD END 2 R AC/AC 370 23 10,310 9/4/2024 79 OKEEFE LN04 OKEEFE LN. - OKEEFE EL MONTE 300' E/O DIANNE 2 R AC 1,410 26 36,660 8/22/2024 79 SUNHIL DR02 SUNHILLS DR. - SUNHIL MORA DR. 245' S OF WEST LOYOLA DR. 2 R AC/AC 700 22 15,400 9/3/2024 79 ARIC LN01 ARIC LN. - ARIC FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC 940 22 22,480 8/29/2024 78 CRESTR DR01 CRESTRIDGE DR. - CRESTRIDGE RAVENSBURY AVE. END 2 R AC/AC 544 33 17,952 9/3/2024 78 EDITHR RD01 EDITH RD. - EDITHR FREMONT RD. 500' N/O FREMONT RD. 2 C AC 500 33 16,500 8/29/2024 78 FERNHI DR01 FERNHILL DR. - FERNHI CAMINO HERMOSO DR. END 2 R AC/AC 1,200 16 19,200 9/3/2024 78 HORSES CT01 HORSESHOE CT. - HORSES HORSESHOE LN. END 2 R AC/AC 465 18 9,670 8/29/2024 78 LIDDIC CR01 LIDDICOAT CR - LIDDIC LIDDICOAT DR LIDDICOAT DR 2 R AC/AC 2,320 21 48,720 8/23/2024 78 MIDDLE LN01 MIDDLE FORK LN - MIDDLE THREE FORKS LN END 2 R AC/AC 1,018 18 18,324 9/4/2024 78 MURIET LN01 MURIETTA LN. - MURIET MOODY RD. END 2 R AC/AC 870 18 17,660 8/28/2024 78 ROBLED RD02 ROBLEDA RD. - ROBLED CHAPIN ELENA 2 C AC 4,250 23 97,750 8/30/2024 78 STFRAN RD01 ST. FRANCIS RD. - STFRAN LA CRESTA DR. ASCENSION DR. 2 R AC/AC 2,660 29 77,140 8/30/2024 78 BERRYH LN01 BERRY HILL LN. - BERYHL BERRYHILL CT END 2 R AC/AC 745 18 13,410 8/23/2024 77 CHAPIN RD01 CHAPIN RD. - CHAPIN BURKE RD. ROBLEDA RD. 2 R AC/AC 1,325 22 29,150 8/30/2024 77 ESHNER CT01 ESHNER CT - ESHNER ALTAMONT RD END 2 R AC 381 22 8,382 8/27/2024 77 FREMON RD04 FREMONT RD. - FREMON MIRANDA RD. WEST EDITH 2 C AC/AC 1,451 25 36,275 8/29/2024 77 JULIET LN01 JULIETTA LN - JULIET SOUTH PROPERTY LINE OF 27340 JULIETTA LN END 2 R AC/AC 300 14 4,200 9/4/2024 77 ROBLEL RD01 ROBLE LADERA RD. - ROBLEL VISCAINO DR. PURISSIMA DR. 2 R AC/AC 1,840 23 42,320 9/1/2022 77 STIRRU WY02 STIRRUP WY - STIRRU ARASTRADERO RD. SADDLE MOUNTAIN RD. 2 R AC 367 21 7,707 8/28/2024 77 STONEB DR02 STONEBROOK DR. - STONEB S. of PROSPECT AVE. TERESA WY. 2 C AC 1,350 23 31,050 9/4/2024 77 VISCAI RD01 VISCAINO RD. - VISCAI PURISSIMA RD. CONCEPCION RD. 2 R AC/AC 3,456 23 79,488 8/28/2024 77 WESTWI WY01 WESTWIND WY - WESTWI CONCEPCION RD LA PALOMA RD 2 R AC/AC 1,070 22 23,540 8/30/2024 77 DAWSON DR02 DAWSON DR. - DAWSON 1155' W of MAGDALENA RD. Half CDS END 2 R AC 1,400 18 26,600 9/3/2024 76 ELENA RD04 ELENA RD. - ELENA ROBLEDA RD. VINEDO LN. 2 C AC 1,682 22 37,004 8/22/2024 76 FREMON RD05 FREMONT RD. - FREMON WEST EDITH BURKE RD. 2 C AC 2,254 24 54,096 8/29/2024 76 OAKPAR CT01 OAK PARK CT. - OAKPAR OAK KNOLL CIRCLE END 2 R AC 1,040 20 22,800 9/4/2024 76 OLDALT RD01 OLD ALTOS RD. - OLDALT BURKE FREMONT 2 R AC/AC 550 18 9,900 9/1/2022 76 PALOHI DR01 PALO HILLS DR. - PALOHI FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 720 20 16,400 8/29/2024 76 STONEB CT01 STONEBROOK CT - STONEB STONEBROOK DR END 2 R AC/AC 770 19 14,630 9/4/2024 76 SUMMER AV01 SUMMERHILL AVE - SUMMER EL MONTE RD Nicole Lane (Southbound Only) 2 C AC/AC 900 16 14,400 8/22/2024 76 VISCAI PL01 VISCAINO PL. - VISCAI VISCAINO RD END 2 R AC/AC 360 24 9,150 9/4/2024 76 DAWSON DR01 DAWSON DR. - DAWSON MAGDALENA RD. 1155' W of MAGDALENA RD. Half CDS 2 R AC 1,155 20 24,600 9/3/2024 75 ELENA RD05 ELENA RD. - ELENA VINEDO LN. MOODY RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,298 25 57,450 8/22/2024 75 HARVAR CT01 HARVARD CT - HARVAR LIDDICOAT CR END 2 R AC/AC 295 17 5,015 8/23/2024 75 HIDDEN CT01 HIDDEN SPRING CT. - HIDDEN ALTAMONT RD. END 2 R AC 105 25 4,725 8/27/2024 75 OKEEFE LN01 OKEEFE LN. - OKEEFE 300' east of DIANE 343' east of VISTA SERENA 2 R AC 1,404 23 32,292 8/22/2024 75 SALTAM DR01 SALTAMONTES WY. - SALTAM ESTACADA DR. END 2 R AC/AC 692 30 20,760 8/29/2024 75 SUNHIL DR01 SUNHILLS DR. - SUNHILLS WEST LOYOLA 245' S/O WEST LAYOLA 2 R AC/AC 245 22 5,390 9/3/2024 75 ALICAN LN01 ALICANTE LN. - ALICAN MANUELLA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 670 16 11,220 8/29/2024 74 BARTON CT01 BARTON CT. - BARTON FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC 135 18 4,430 8/29/2024 74 BENTLE CT01 BENTLEY CT. - BENTLE BURKE RD. END 2 R AC/AC 220 18 6,160 8/30/2024 74 FAWNCR CT01 FAWN CREEK CT. - FAWNCR PAGE MILL RD. END 2 R AC/AC 695 18 14,510 8/23/2024 74 HORSES LN01 HORSESHOE LN. - HORSES ARASTRADERO RD. END 2 R AC/AC 828 22 18,216 8/29/2024 74 NATOMA RD03 NATOMA RD. - NATOMA LUCERO LN. ALTAMONT RD. 2 C AC/AC 1,600 20 32,000 8/27/2024 74 OLDRLN LN01 OLD RANCH LN. - OLDRANCHL OLD RANCH RD END 2 R AC 403 33 13,299 9/3/2024 74 BARLEY RD01 BARLEY HILL RD. - BARLEY HILLTOP DR. END 2 R AC/AC 1,745 16 27,920 9/3/2024 73 GOLDEN CT01 GOLDEN HILL CT. - GOLDEN LA PALOMA RD. END 2 R AC 750 20 15,000 9/1/2022 73 LARENA LN01 LA RENA LN. - LARENA DIANNE DR. END 2 R AC/AC 1,200 23 27,600 8/22/2024 73 MAGDAL AV01 MAGDALENA RD. - MAGDAL CAMINO HERMOSA STONEBROOK 2 C AC/AC 3,800 23 87,400 9/3/2024 73 NORMAN LN01 NORMANDY LN. - NORMAN O'KEEFE LN. END 2 R AC/AC 730 25 19,250 8/22/2024 73 PAGEMI RD00 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI 75 FT S. OF ARASTRADERO RD BERRY HILL CT 2 C AC/AC 645 60 38,700 8/23/2024 73 STFRAN RD02 ST. FRANCIS RD. - STFRAN ASCENSION DR. FREMONT RD. 2 R AC/AC 481 52 25,012 8/30/2024 73 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 4/5

Town of Los Altos Hills - PTAP25 Pavement Management Program Update PCI Listing Report - Sorted by Descending PCI
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of Lanes FC ST Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
TERESA WY01 TERESA WY. - TERESA STONEBROOK DR KATE DR 2 R AC 250 22 5,500 9/4/2024 73 ALMADE CT01 ALMADEN CT. - ALMADE ALTAMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,840 18 35,268 8/27/2024 72 COLINA DR01 COLINA DR. - COLINA HILLTOP END 2 R AC/AC 475 22 12,250 9/3/2024 72 DORI LN01 DORI LN. - DORI ROBLEDA RD. END 2 R AC 210 22 6,445 8/30/2024 72 DUVAL WY01 DUVAL WY. - DUVAL ROBLEDA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,200 21 25,200 8/30/2024 72 GIGLI CT01 GIGLI CT. - GIGLI ELENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 430 18 9,070 9/4/2024 72 HILLTO DR02 HILLTOP DR. - HILLTO BARLEY HILL RD END 2 R AC/AC 1,070 15 16,050 9/3/2024 72 MATADE LN01 MATADERO CREEK LN. - MATADE PAGE MILL MATADERO CREEK CT. 2 R AC/AC 783 18 14,094 8/23/2024 72 PAGEMI RD03 PAGE MILL RD. - PAGEMI COUNTRY WY MATADERO CREEK LN 2 C AC/AC 2,548 24 61,152 8/23/2024 72 PURISS RD04 PURISSIMA RD. - PURISS CONCEPCION RD. ROBLEDA RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,325 23 53,475 8/22/2024 72 ROBLEV LN01 ROBLE VENENO LN. - ROBLEV CONCEPCION RD. END 2 R AC 330 22 7,760 8/28/2024 72 ALTAMO RD02 ALTAMONT RD. - ALTAMO BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. TAAFFE RD. 2 C AC/AC 2,979 24 71,496 8/27/2024 71 AMHERS CT01 AMHERST CT - AMHERS LIDDICOAT DR END 2 R AC/AC 1,100 21 24,670 8/23/2024 71 CARADO CT01 CARADO CT. - CARADO MIRANDA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 370 16 5,920 8/29/2024 71 ELENA RD01 ELENA RD. - ELENA PURISSIMA RD. NATOMA RD. 2 C AC 3,048 21 64,008 8/22/2024 71 FREMON LN01 FREMONT PINES LN. - FREMON FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 600 22 14,720 8/29/2024 71 PRISCI LN01 PRISCILLA LN. - PRISCI STONEBROOK DR. BOTH ENDS 2 R AC 1,280 24 30,720 9/4/2024 71 SPRING DR01 SPRINGHILL DR. - SPRING MANUELLA RD. END 2 R AC 320 22 7,040 8/30/2024 71 MOODY RD03 MOODY RD. - MOODY FRANCEMONT AVE. 570 W/O MURIETA LN. 2 C AC/AC 3,090 23 71,070 8/28/2024 70 SADDLE DR01 SADDLE MOUNTAIN DR. - SADDLE STIRRUP WY. END 2 R AC 2,639 20 52,780 8/28/2024 70 ELENA RD03 ELENA RD. - ELENA LA BARRANCA RD. ROBLEDA RD. 2 C AC 4,202 22 92,444 8/22/2024 69 FOOTHI LN01 FOOTHILL LN. - FOOTHI ELENA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 1,014 23 23,322 9/4/2024 69 KATE DR01 KATE DR. - KATE END EAST TERESA WY 2 R AC 840 20 19,300 9/4/2024 69 LEANDE DR01 LEANDER DR. - LEANDE PURISSIMA RD. END 2 R AC 530 21 12,630 8/30/2024 69 MIRAND CT01 MIRANDA CT. - MIRAND MIRANDA RD END 2 R AC/AC 265 23 7,920 8/29/2024 69 NATOMA RD01 NATOMA RD. - NATOMA ELENA RD. BLACK MOUNTAIN RD. 2 C AC/AC 3,000 21 63,000 8/27/2024 69 TEPA WY01 TEPA WY. - TEPA SUMMITWOOD RD END 2 R AC/AC 630 28 17,640 8/28/2024 69 WESTON DR01 WESTON DR. - WESTON FREMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 891 23 20,493 8/29/2024 69 ALTOVE LN01 ALTO VERDE LN. - ALTOVE CONCEPCION RD. END 2 R AC 577 22 12,694 8/30/2024 68 FREMON RD01 FREMONT RD. - FREMON ARASTRADERO RD. ST. FRANCIS DR. 2 C AC/AC 3,620 30 108,600 8/29/2024 68 STIRRU WY01 STIRRUP WY. - STIRRU SADDLE MOUNTAIN RD. END 2 R AC 820 17 16,140 8/28/2024 68 BURKE RD01 BURKE RD. - BURKE CHAPIN RD. 100' N. of OLD ALTOS RD./ COP 2 C AC/AC 2,038 24 48,912 8/30/2024 66 ESPERA DR01 ESPERANZA DR. - ESPERA CONCEPCION RD ESPERANZA DR 2 R AC 2,674 22 58,828 8/30/2024 66 HILLTO DR01 HILLTOP DR. - HILLTO BARLEY HILL RD. SUMMERHILL AVE. 2 R AC/AC 2,800 21 58,800 9/3/2024 66 MANUEL RD02 MANUELLA RD. - MANUEL ALICANTE 400' north of SCARFF 2 C AC/AC 2,450 24 58,800 8/29/2024 66 RANCHO LN01 RANCHO MANUELLA LN. - RANCHO MANUELLA RD. END 2 R AC 510 16 8,160 8/29/2024 65 ROBLEA DR01 ROBLE ALTO DR - ROBLEA PASEO DEL ROBLE DR END 2 R AC/AC 830 20 18,740 8/23/2024 64 SCARFF WY01 SCARFF WY - SCARFW MANUELLA RD END 2 R AC/AC 320 20 6,400 8/29/2024 64 BRIONE WY01 BRIONES WAY - BRIONE ALTAMONT RD. VIA VENTANA WY. 2 C AC/AC 1,600 20 32,000 8/23/2024 63 REBECC LN01 REBECCA LN. - REBECC DAWSON DR. END 2 R AC/AC 900 18 16,200 9/3/2024 63 JESSIC LN01 JESSICA LN. - JESSIC DAWSON DR. END 2 R AC 470 18 9,960 9/3/2024 61 MANUEL RD01 MANUELLA RD. - MANUEL FREMONT ALICANTE 2 C AC/AC 965 23 22,195 8/29/2024 61 MOODYS CT01 MOODY SPRINGS CT. - MOODYS MOODY RD. END (CDS) 2 R AC/AC 336 18 6,048 8/28/2024 61 ROBLEB CT01 ROBLE BLANCO CT - ROBLEB PASEO DEL ROBLE DR END 2 R AC/AC 900 21 18,900 8/23/2024 61 WILDPL LN01 WILD PLUM LN. - WILDPL MIRANDA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 650 20 14,500 8/29/2024 61 DIANNE DR01 DIANNE DR. - DIANNE O'KEEFE LN. END 2 R AC/AC 1,200 23 27,600 8/22/2024 60 CORTEM LN01 CORTE MADERA LN. - CORTEM CONCEPCION RD. END 2 R AC 580 22 13,870 8/30/2024 59 LIDDIC DR01 LIDDICOAT DR - LIDDIC ARASTRADERO RD LIDDICOAT CR 2 R AC/AC 1,131 21 23,751 8/23/2024 55 OLDPAG LN01 OLD PAGE MILL LN - OLDPAG PAGE MILL RD CUL DE SAC 2 R AC/AC 255 22 5,610 9/4/2024 53 STANFO CT01 STANFORD CT - STANFO LIDDICOAT CR END 2 R AC/AC 540 16 11,640 8/23/2024 53 CORBET LN01 CORBETTA - CORBET ALTAMONT RD END 2 R AC/AC 1,190 19 22,610 8/27/2024 48 SUNSET DR01 SUNSET DR EAST - SUNSET BURKE RD END 2 R AC/AC 1,550 15 23,250 8/30/2024 35 FC (Functional Classification): A (Arterial), C (Collector), R (Residentials ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 5/5

Appendix B
Maintenance and Rehabilitation Decision Tree

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) Decision Tree
This report presents the current maintenance and rehabilitation decision tree that exists in the database.

The decision tree forms the basis for all of the budgetary computations included in this report. Changes to the decision tree will make the results in the budget reports invalid. All pavement treatment unit costs relevant to the road types in the database were updated.

The decision tree lists the treatments and costs selected for preventive maintenance and rehabilitation activities. Each line represents a specific combination of functional classification and surface type.

The preventive maintenance portion of the report is identified as Condition Category I – Very Good. All preventive maintenance treatment listings are assigned only to sections in Condition Category I where the PCI ≥ 70. Sections with PCI values less than 70 are assigned to treatments listed in Categories II through V.

In the preventive maintenance category (PCI  70), a time sequence is used to identify the appropriate treatment and cost. Each preventive maintenance treatment description consists of three parts: 1) a CRACK treatment, 2) a SURFACE treatment, and 3) a RESTORATION treatment. These three parts allow the user to specify one of three different preventive maintenance treatments depending on the prior maintenance history of the section.

1. The CRACK treatment part can be used to specify the most frequent type of preventive maintenance activity planned (typically crack seals).

2. The SURFACE treatment part can be used to specify more extensive and less frequent preventive maintenance activities, such as chip seals or slurry seals. For example, a crack seal can be specified on a 3-year cycle with a slurry seal specified after 5 years.

3. The RESTORATION part can be used to specify a surface restoration treatment (such as an overlay) to be performed after a specified number of surface treatments. For example, after a certain number of successive slurry seals, an overlay can be specified instead of another slurry seal.

Rehabilitation treatments are assigned to sections in Condition Categories II through V (PCI less than 70).

Each line is defined by a specific combination of functional classification, surface type, and condition category.

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Functional Class Functional Classification identifying the branch Surface Surface Type identifying the branch number.

Condition Category Condition Category (I through V).

Treatment Type
First Row (Crack Treatment) indicates localized treatment (e.g., crack sealing).

Second Row (Surface Treatment) indicates surface treatment (e.g., slurry sealing).

Third Row (Restoration Treatment) indicates surface restoration (e.g., overlay).

Treatment Name of treatments from the "Treatment Descriptions" report.

Yrs. Between Crack Seals First Row - number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the first row (i.e., CRACK treatment).

Yrs. Between Surface
Seals
Second Row - number of years between successive treatment applications specified in the second row (i.e., SURFACE treatment).

Number of Sequential
Seals
Number of times that the treatment application in the second row (i.e., SURFACE treatment) will be performed prior to performing the treatment application in the third row.

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Note that the treatments assigned to each section should not be blindly followed in preparing a road maintenance program. Engineering judgment and project level analysis should be applied to ensure that the treatment is appropriate and cost effective for the section.

Decision Tree: Default
Arterial AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $3.50 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$15.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING_RT $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$21.50 8
III - Good, Load Related 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $45.50 IV - Poor 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $51.50
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $113.00
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $3.50 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$15.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING_RT $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$21.50 8
III - Good, Load Related 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $45.50 IV - Poor 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $51.50
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $113.00
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 6
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 2
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
Town of Los Altos Hills
Printed: 3/12/2025
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal

Decision Tree: Default
Arterial IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
Town of Los Altos Hills
Printed: 3/12/2025
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 2 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal

Decision Tree: Default
Collector AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $3.50 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$15.00 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING_RT $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$20.50 8
III - Good, Load Related 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $43.75 IV - Poor 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $49.50
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $108.75
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $3.50 3 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$15.00 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING_RT $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$20.50 8
III - Good, Load Related 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $43.75 IV - Poor 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $49.50
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $108.75
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
Town of Los Altos Hills
Printed: 3/12/2025
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 3 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal

Decision Tree: Default
Collector IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
Town of Los Altos Hills
Printed: 3/12/2025
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 4 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal

Decision Tree: Default
Residential/Local AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $3.50 4 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$14.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING_RT $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$16.25 8
III - Good, Load Related SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$24.25 7
IV - Poor 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $42.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $84.25
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment SEAL CRACKS $3.50 4 Surface Treatment SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$14.50 7
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING_RT $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$16.25 8
III - Good, Load Related SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
$24.25 7
IV - Poor 2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS $42.00
V - Very Poor RECONSTRUCT STRUCTURE (AC) $84.25
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
Town of Los Altos Hills
Printed: 3/12/2025
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 5 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal

Decision Tree: Default
Residential/Local III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00 IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
Town of Los Altos Hills
Printed: 3/12/2025
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 6 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal

Decision Tree: Default
Other AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
AC/AC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
AC/PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 8
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 3
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
Town of Los Altos Hills
Printed: 3/12/2025
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 7 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal

Decision Tree: Default
Other PCC I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 4 Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
ST I - Very Good Crack Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 9
Surface Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 15
Restoration Treatment DO NOTHING $0.00 99
II - Good, Non-Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
III - Good, Load Related DO NOTHING $0.00
IV - Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
V - Very Poor DO NOTHING $0.00
# of Surface
Seals before
Overlay
Functional
Class
Town of Los Altos Hills
Printed: 3/12/2025
Decision Tree
Surface Condition Category Treatment Type Treatment Yrs Between Crack Seals
Yrs Between
Surface Seals
Cost/Sq Yd,
except Seal
Cracks in LF:

Functional Class and Surface combination not used
Criteria: 8 MTC StreetSaver
Selected Treatment is not a Surface Seal

Appendix C
Budget Needs Analysis Results

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Budget Needs Reports
The purpose of this section is to answer the question: If the Town had all the money in the world, what sections should be fixed and how much will it cost? Based on the Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) decision tree and the PCIs of the sections, the program will then select a maintenance or rehabilitation action and compute the total costs over a period of five years. The Budget Needs represents the "ideal world" funding levels, while the Budget Scenario reports in the next section represent the most "cost effective" prioritization possible for the actual funding levels.

A budget needs analysis has been performed. The summary results from the analysis are shown below.

An interest rate of 4% and an inflation factor of 4% were used to project the costs for the next five years.

This report shows the total ten-year budget that would be required to meet the Town’s standards as exemplified in the M&R decision tree.

Budget Needs reports included in this appendix are listed below:
➢ Projected PCI/Cost Summary
➢ Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary
➢ Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Needs - Projected PCI/Cost Summary
This report summarizes and projects the network PCI over the five-year analysis period, both with and without treatments applied. It also reports the associated costs, which are based on the treatment unit costs presented in the M&R decision tree.

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Year Year in the analysis period.

PCI Treated Projected network average PCI with all needed treatments applied.

PCI Untreated Projected network average PCI without any treatments applied.

PM Cost Total preventive maintenance treatment cost.

Rehab Cost Total rehabilitation treatment cost.

Cost The budget required for each year in the analysis period to meet the Town’s standard as shown on the M&R decision tree.

Total Cost Total budget required over a five-year period.

Year PM Cost Rehab Cost Cost
2025
PCI Treated PCI Untreated
86 80 $4,091,749 $2,975,763 $7,067,512
2026 85 79 $706,101 $1,401,618 $2,107,719
2027 84 77 $559,317 $1,194,899 $1,754,216
2028 83 76 $1,050,687 $97,951 $1,148,638
2029 83 74 $1,875,364 $294,827 $2,170,191
Total Cost
$14,248,276
PM Total Cost
$8,283,218
% PM

58.13% $5,965,058
Rehab Total Cost
Needs - Projected PCI/Cost
Summary
Printed: 3/12/2025
Town of Los Altos Hills
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00%
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Needs - Preventive Maintenance Treatment/Cost Summary
This report summarizes each preventive maintenance treatment type, quantity of pavement affected, and total costs over the analysis period. It also summarizes the total quantities and costs over the next five years.

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Treatment Type of preventive maintenance treatments needed.

Year Year in the analysis period (i.e., 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029) Area Treated Quantities in linear feet (Seal Cracks) or square yard (Microsurfacing).

Cost Maintenance treatment cost.

Treatment Year Area Treated Cost
SEAL CRACKS 2025 1,524.57 sq. yd. $5,336
2026 915.49 sq. yd. $3,332
2027 1,200.98 sq. yd. $4,546
2028 3,722.18 sq. yd. $14,654
2029 6,336.27 sq. yd. $25,944
Total 13,699.49 $53,813

SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
2025 278,820.86 sq. yd. $4,086,413
2026 45,506.22 sq. yd. $702,769
2027 34,089.89 sq. yd. $554,771
2028 63,271 sq. yd. $1,036,033
2029 104,557.44 sq. yd. $1,849,420
Total 526,245.41 $8,229,405
Town of Los Altos Hills Needs - Preventive Maintenance
Treatment/Cost Summary
Printed:
3/12/2025
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00%
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Total Quantity 539,944.9 $8,283,218

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Needs - Rehabilitation Treatment/Cost Summary
This report summarizes each rehabilitation treatment type, quantity of pavement affected, and total costs over the analysis period. It also summarizes the total quantities and costs over the next five years.

COLUMN DESCRIPTION
Treatment Type of rehabilitation treatments needed.

Year Year in the analysis period (i.e., 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029) Area Treated Quantities in square yard.

Cost Rehabilitation treatment cost.

Treatment Year Area Treated Cost
2" OVERLAY WITH DIGOUTS 2025 50,048.56 sq.yd. $2,180,707 2026 13,885.67 sq.yd. $631,798
2027 10,310.67 sq.yd. $487,901
2029 1,833.33 sq.yd. $93,832
Total 76,078.22 sq.yd. $3,394,238
SURFACE SEAL W/ CRACK SEAL AND DIGOUTS 2025 36,283.44 sq.yd. $795,056 2026 32,674.7 sq.yd. $769,820
2027 30,746.11 sq.yd. $706,999
2028 3,848.89 sq.yd. $97,951
2029 7,085 sq.yd. $200,995
Total 110,638.14 sq.yd. $2,570,820
Needs - Rehabilitation
Treatment/Cost Summary
Printed: 3/12/2025
Town of Los Altos Hills
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00%
Criteria: 1 MTC StreetSaver
Total Cost $5,965,058

Appendix D
Budget Scenario Results

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Scenario 1: Town’s Existing Budget of $1.2M/year
Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report

Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
2025 $1,200,000
$130,697
$22,804
$107,892
$0
$0
$90,183 $0 $5,941,786 $0
$8,489
40%
$179,208
$797,707
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $1,200,000
$719,714
$175,170
$544,544
$0
$0
$476,706 $3,294 $7,090,757 $0
$5,376
40%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $1,200,000
$833,357
$10,741
$615,665
$206,951
$0
$361,802 $0 $8,020,907 $0
$4,842
30%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2028 $1,200,000
$897,039
$117,475
$779,564
$0
$0
$301,277 $0 $8,330,730 $0
$1,389
25%
$1,269
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2029 $1,200,000
$957,105
$132,801
$824,304
$0
$0
$240,440 $0 $9,905,150 $0
$2,952
20%
$128
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $0 $437,224 $0 $0
Collector $3,583,965 $785,273 $0 $9,502
Residential/Local $751,653 $428,513 $0 $13,546
Grand Total: $4,335,618 $1,651,010 $0 $23,048
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver

Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2025 $1,200,000 40%
2026 $1,200,000 40%
2027 $1,200,000 30%
2028 $1,200,000 25%
2029 $1,200,000 20%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2025 80 82 9.29 18.59
2026 79 81 7.30 14.59
2027 77 80 9.09 18.18
2028 76 80 10.07 20.14
2029 74 79 7.05 14.10
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2025, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 28.2% 48.9% 0.0% 86.3%
II / III 0.0% 6.6% 6.6% 0.0% 13.1%
IV 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2025 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 29.9% 49.6% 0.0% 88.8%
II / III 0.0% 4.8% 6.4% 0.0% 11.2%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2029 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 30.0% 44.1% 0.0% 83.4%
II / III 0.0% 4.7% 11.9% 0.0% 16.6%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 3/12/2025
Town of Los Altos Hills
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00%
1 MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Scenario 2: Town’s Modified Budget of $1.0M/year
Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report

Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S2- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.0M/YR
2025 $1,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$17,097 $0 $6,145,568 $0
$8,992
40%
$179,208
$797,707
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $1,000,000
$598,568
$54,024
$544,544
$0
$0
$399,884 $116 $7,500,658 $0
$6,295
40%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $1,000,000
$694,852
$0
$487,901
$206,951
$0
$303,933 $0 $8,643,578 $0
$4,323
30%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2028 $1,000,000
$742,104
$8,997
$733,107
$0
$0
$256,222 $0 $9,384,311 $0
$2,877
25%
$1,269
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2029 $1,000,000
$793,765
$83,079
$710,687
$0
$0
$205,739 $0 $11,197,522 $0
$4,241
20%
$128
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $0 $440,922 $0 $0
Collector $3,043,372 $625,484 $0 $11,962
Residential/Local $583,625 $297,072 $0 $14,767
Grand Total: $3,626,997 $1,363,478 $0 $26,729
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver

Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2025 $1,000,000 40%
2026 $1,000,000 40%
2027 $1,000,000 30%
2028 $1,000,000 25%
2029 $1,000,000 20%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2025 80 82 8.65 17.29
2026 79 81 6.59 13.19
2027 77 80 8.40 16.79
2028 76 79 8.78 17.57
2029 74 78 6.13 12.25
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2025, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 28.2% 48.9% 0.0% 86.3%
II / III 0.0% 6.6% 6.6% 0.0% 13.1%
IV 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2025 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 29.6% 49.5% 0.0% 88.3%
II / III 0.0% 5.1% 6.6% 0.0% 11.7%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2029 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 27.5% 43.0% 0.0% 79.7%
II / III 0.0% 7.3% 13.0% 0.0% 20.3%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 3/12/2025
Town of Los Altos Hills
Scenario: 2025 S2- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.0M/YR
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00%
1 MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 80 ($1.7M/year on Average)
Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report

Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S3- MAINTAIN PCI AT 80
2025 $1,000,000
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$17,097 $5,987 $6,145,568 $0
$8,992
100%
$179,208
$797,707
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $440,400
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$435,582 $4,818 $8,063,528 $0
$6,295
100%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $1,850,000
$924,684
$151,407
$566,326
$206,951
$0
$923,722 $1,278 $8,379,341 $0
$5,386
50%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2028 $2,250,000
$1,416,347
$95,033
$1,321,314
$0
$0
$829,745 $2,285 $7,654,333 $0
$1,389
37%
$1,269
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2029 $3,227,679
$515,287
$14,870
$500,417
$0
$0
$2,706,060 $5,083 $7,176,691 $0
$4,508
84%
$128
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $0 $1,380,938 $0 $0
Collector $2,955,190 $1,462,530 $0 $12,199
Residential/Local $698,836 $2,249,345 $0 $14,371
Grand Total: $3,654,026 $5,092,813 $0 $26,570
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver

Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2025 $1,000,000 100%
2026 $440,400 100%
2027 $1,850,000 50%
2028 $2,250,000 37%
2029 $3,227,679 84%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2025 80 82 8.65 17.29
2026 79 80 5.59 11.18
2027 77 80 12.05 24.09
2028 76 80 12.55 25.10
2029 74 80 15.08 30.03
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2025, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 28.2% 48.9% 0.0% 86.3%
II / III 0.0% 6.6% 6.6% 0.0% 13.1%
IV 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2025 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 29.6% 49.5% 0.0% 88.3%
II / III 0.0% 5.1% 6.6% 0.0% 11.7%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2029 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 28.0% 43.9% 0.0% 81.0%
II / III 0.0% 6.8% 12.2% 0.0% 19.0%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 3/12/2025
Town of Los Altos Hills
Scenario: 2025 S3- MAINTAIN PCI AT 80
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00%
1 MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Scenario 4: Unconstrained Budget ($2.8M/Year on Average) Cost Summary Report
Network Condition Summary Report

Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Cost Summary
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S4- UNCONSTRAINED
BUDGET
2025 $7,100,000
$2,098,315
$147,243
$1,951,072
$0
$0
$3,928,832 $0 $135,518 $0
$793
58%
$179,208
$797,707
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2026 $2,150,000
$1,324,276
$296,490
$1,027,786
$0
$0
$706,101 $24,899 $218,280 $0
$415
34%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2027 $1,800,000
$1,221,487
$337,292
$677,244
$206,951
$0
$559,317 $16,683 $287,885 $0
$967
32%
$0
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2028 $1,150,000
$86,433
$14,298
$72,135
$0
$0
$1,049,015 $0 $310,918 $0
$162
91%
$1,269
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
2029 $2,200,000
$294,827
$0
$294,827
$0
$0
$1,875,236 $16,654 $323,355 $0
$0
86%
$128
$0
II
III
IV
V
NonProject
Project
Funded
Unmet
Project
Total
Functional Class Rehabilitation Prev. Maint. Stop Gap
Summary
Stop Gap
Funded Unmet
Arterial $0 $1,357,867 $0 $0
Collector $3,731,253 $2,220,824 $0 $0
Residential/Local $2,091,792 $4,720,417 $0 $2,336
Grand Total: $5,823,045 $8,299,108 $0 $2,336
Year PM Budget Rehabilitation Surplus PM Deferred Stop Gap Preventative
Maintenance
Criteria:

Scenarios Criteria:
1 MTC StreetSaver

Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2025 $7,100,000 58%
2026 $2,150,000 34%
2027 $1,800,000 32%
2028 $1,150,000 91%
2029 $2,200,000 86%
Projected Network Average PCI by Year
With Selected Treatment Treated Centerline
Miles
Treated Lane
Miles
Year Never Treated
2025 80 86 32.87 65.60
2026 79 85 10.74 21.47
2027 77 84 11.09 22.18
2028 76 83 18.61 37.23
2029 74 83 28.99 57.83
Percent Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category Condition
Condition in base year 2025, prior to applying treatments.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 28.2% 48.9% 0.0% 86.3%
II / III 0.0% 6.6% 6.6% 0.0% 13.1%
IV 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2025 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 33.6% 53.1% 0.0% 95.8%
II / III 0.0% 1.2% 3.0% 0.0% 4.2%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Condition
Condition in year 2029 after schedulable treatments applied.

Arterial Collector Res/Loc Other Total
I 9.2% 33.1% 51.1% 0.0% 93.4%
II / III 0.0% 1.7% 4.9% 0.0% 6.6%
Total 9.2% 34.8% 56.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Scenarios - Network Condition Summary
Printed: 3/12/2025
Town of Los Altos Hills
Scenario: 2025 S4- UNCONSTRAINED
BUDGET
Interest: 4.00% Inflation: 4.00%
1 MTC StreetSaver
Scenarios Criteria:

Appendix E
Pavement Condition Maps

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Current Network Condition - 2024

Adobe Crk
Purisima Crk
Dry Crk
Adobe Crk
Purisima
Crk
Adobe Crk
Purisima
Crk
Dry Crk
Adobe Crk
Boronda Lk
Current PCI Condition
Printed: 3/12/2025
Town of Los Altos Hills

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Scenario 1: Town’s Existing Budget of $1.2M/year
Projected Street Network Condition - 2029

Adobe Crk
Dry Crk
Adobe Crk
Purisima
Crk
Adobe Crk
Purisima
Crk
Dry Crk
Boronda Lk
Scenario PCI Condition
2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR - 2029 Project Period - Total Rehab for 2029: $957,105 - Printed: 3/12/2025 Town of Los Altos Hills

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Scenario 2: Town’s Modified Budget of $1.0M/year
Projected Street Network Condition – 2029

Adobe Crk
Purisima Crk
Dry Crk
Adobe Crk
Purisima
Crk
Adobe Crk
Purisima
Crk
Dry Crk
Adobe Crk
Boronda Lk
Scenario PCI Condition
2025 S2- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.0M/YR - 2029 Project Period - Total Rehab for 2029: $793,765 - Printed: 3/12/2025 Town of Los Altos Hills

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Scenario 3: Maintain PCI at 80 ($1.7M/year on Average)
Projected Street Network Condition – 2029

Adobe Crk
Dry Crk
Adobe Crk
Purisima
Crk
Adobe Crk
Dry Crk
Boronda Lk
Scenario PCI Condition
2025 S3- MAINTAIN PCI AT 80 - 2029 Project Period - Total Rehab for 2029: $515,287 - Printed: 3/12/2025 Town of Los Altos Hills

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Scenario 4: Unconstrained Budget ($2.8M/Year on Average) Projected Street Network Condition – 2029

Adobe Crk
Dry Crk
Adobe Crk
Purisima
Crk
Adobe Crk
Purisima
Crk
Dry Crk
Adobe Crk
Boronda Lk
Scenario PCI Condition
2025 S4- UNCONSTRAINED BUDGET - 2029 Project Period - Total Rehab for 2029: $294,827 - Printed: 3/12/2025 Town of Los Altos Hills

Appendix F
Sections Selected for Treatment: Scenario 1

Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd.

Scenario 1: Town’s Existing Budget of $1.2M/year
Section Selected for Treatment

Year Budget PM Year Budget PM Year Budget PM
2025 $1,200,000 40%
2026 $1,200,000 40%
2027 $1,200,000 30%
2028 $1,200,000 25%
2029 $1,200,000 20%
Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2025
**CORBETTA ALTAMONT RD END CORBET LN01 R AC/AC 0 $113,678 8,363 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
1,190 19 22,610 47 47 100
**FREMONT RD. ARASTRADERO 0
RD.

ST. FRANCIS DR. FREMON RD01 C AC/AC $567,133 6,816 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
3,620 30 108,600 67 67 100
MANUELLA RD. FREMONT ALICANTE MANUEL RD01 C AC/AC 0 $107,892 8,745 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
965 23 22,195 60 60 100
**SUNSET DR EAST BURKE RD END SUNSET DR01 R AC/AC 0 $116,896 8,886 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
1,550 15 23,250 34 34 100
Treatment Total $905,600
FREMONT RD. CONCEPCION RD MANUELLA RD FREMON RD03A C AC/AC 0 $48,780 12,862 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
1,084 27 29,268 80 81 88
LEANDER DR. PURISSIMA RD. END LEANDE DR01 R AC 0 $22,804 6,411 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
530 21 12,630 68 68 78
**ROBLEDA RD. CHAPIN ELENA ROBLED RD02 C AC 0 $179,208 6,725 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
4,250 23 97,750 77 77 85
TAAFFE RD. DEZAHARA WAY 0
(N.)

DEZAHARA WAY
(S.)
TAAFFE RD02A C AC/AC $36,067 9,625 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
1,082 20 21,640 79 80 87
Treatment Total $286,859
ADONNA CT ELENA RD END ADONNA CT01 370 23 10,310 R AC/AC 0 78 79 81 $124 258,836 SEAL CRACKS ALTAMONT RD. PAGE MILL RD. BLACK 0
MOUNTAIN RD.

ALTAMO RD01 2,592 21 54,432 C AC/AC 87 87 88 $110 901,223 SEAL CRACKS ARASTRADERO RD. HORSESHOE LN. STIRRUP WY. ARASTR RD01 1,900 40 76,000 A AC/AC 0 82 82 83 $695 503,524 SEAL CRACKS BERKSHIRE DR. WEST LOYOLA (S) WEST LOYOLA
(E)
BERKSH DR01 1,855 18 33,390 R AC/AC 88 89 89 $5 8,907,054 SEAL CRACKS CHAPIN RD. BURKE RD. ROBLEDA RD. CHAPIN RD01 1,325 22 29,150 R AC/AC 0 76 77 79 $390 257,813 SEAL CRACKS CONCEPTION RD. FREMONT RD. PURISSIMA RD. CONCEP RD01 4,604 20 92,080 C AC/AC 0 86 87 88 $312 680,791 SEAL CRACKS EL MONTE RD. (WB) O'KEEFE LN. FORK AT 950' W 0
OF

STONEBROOK
DR.

ELMONT RD03 3,411 32 109,152 A AC/AC 87 88 88 $212 1,504,610 SEAL CRACKS Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 1 MTC StreetSaver

Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2025
HORSESHOE CT. HORSESHOE LN. END HORSES CT01 465 18 9,670 R AC/AC 0 77 78 80 $124 216,923 SEAL CRACKS LUPINE RD. PAGE MILL RD. END LUPINE RD01 1,179 22 25,938 R AC/AC 0 86 86 87 $92 393,925 SEAL CRACKS MAPLE LEAF CT. ELENA RD. CULDESAC MAPLEL CT01 131 23 3,013 R AC 80 81 82 $32 235,074 SEAL CRACKS NATOMA RD. BLACK MOUNTAIN 0
RD.

LUCERO LN. NATOMA RD02 1,559 20 31,180 C AC/AC 81 82 83 $288 290,166 SEAL CRACKS ORTEGA DR. ST. FRANCIS RD. END ORTEGA DR01 820 20 18,500 R AC/AC 0 82 83 84 $155 262,915 SEAL CRACKS PAGE MILL RD. BERRY HILL BALERI RANCH 0
RD.

PAGEMI RD01 700 20 14,000 C AC/AC 84 84 86 $89 319,685 SEAL CRACKS PAGE MILL RD. MATADERO 0

CREEK LN
935' north of

ALTAMONT
PAGEMI RD04 3,150 24 75,600 C AC/AC 83 83 85 $572 285,606 SEAL CRACKS ROBLE ALTO CT ROBLE ALTO DR END ROBLEA CT01 260 16 6,440 R AC/AC 0 82 82 84 $55 242,889 SEAL CRACKS ROBLEDA RD. FREMONT CHAPIN ROBLED RD01 3,325 22 73,150 C AC/AC 0 84 84 86 $470 284,862 SEAL CRACKS SADDLE CT. SADDLE 0
MOUNTAIN DR.

END SADDLE CT01 970 17 17,360 R AC 79 80 81 $197 280,970 SEAL CRACKS SALTAMONTES WY. ESTACADA DR. END SALTAM DR01 692 30 20,760 R AC/AC 0 74 74 77 $304 160,419 SEAL CRACKS STIRRUP WY ARASTRADERO 0
RD.

SADDLE
MOUNTAIN RD.

STIRRU WY02 367 21 7,707 R AC 76 77 79 $103 220,909 SEAL CRACKS VISTA DEL VALLE CT. TAAFFE END VISTAD CT01 360 23 9,280 R AC/AC 0 82 83 84 $78 273,847 SEAL CRACKS WEST LOYOLA DR. CAMINO

HERMOSA
HWY280
(EASTBROOK)
WLOYO DR01 4,762 21 100,002 A AC/AC 81 82 83 $931 593,167 SEAL CRACKS Treatment Total $5,336
Year 2025 Area Total 1,155,057 Year 2025 Total $1,197,795 Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2026
BURKE RD. CHAPIN RD. 100' N. of OLD 0
ALTOS RD./ COP
BURKE RD01 C AC/AC $247,277 8,059 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
2,038 24 48,912 65 63 100
MANUELLA RD. ALICANTE 400' north of 0
SCARFF
MANUEL RD02 C AC/AC $297,267 7,830 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
2,450 24 58,800 65 63 100
Treatment Total $544,544
EL MONTE RD. MOODY RD. FORK AT 950' W 0
OF

STONEBROOK
DR.

ELMONT RD01 A AC/AC $121,867 9,291 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
1,890 36 68,040 83 82 89
Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 2 MTC StreetSaver

Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2026
FINN LN. PROSPECT AVE. END FINN LN01 R AC 0 $19,688 8,613 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
400 21 11,750 81 81 88
FRAMPTON CT. MAGDALENA RD. END FRAMPT CT01 R AC 0 $12,232 8,705 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
240 20 7,300 83 82 89
LA LANNE CT. MIRANDA END LALANN CT01 R AC 0 $32,337 8,719 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
919 21 19,299 84 83 90
MELODY LN. BLACK MOUNTAIN 0
RD.

END MELODY LN01 R AC/AC $31,165 8,614 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
855 20 18,600 85 84 91
MOODY RD. ELENA RD. ALTAMONT RD. MOODY RD01 C AC/AC 0 $59,072 9,379 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
1,420 24 34,080 80 79 87
NATOMA RD. LUCERO LN. ALTAMONT RD. NATOMA RD03 C AC/AC 0 $55,467 9,162 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
1,600 20 32,000 73 72 81
PAGE MILL RD. COUNTRY WY MATADERO 0

CREEK LN
PAGEMI RD03 C AC/AC $144,862 6,469 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
2,548 24 61,152 71 70 79
RAVENSBURY AVE. HILLPARK LN. END RAVENS AV02 A AC/AC $107,603 9,050 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
2,612 23 60,076 82 81 88
STIRRUP WY. SADDLE 0
MOUNTAIN RD.

END STIRRU WY01 R AC $30,307 5,931 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
820 17 16,140 67 66 75
TEMPLETON PL. FREMONT RD. END (CDS) TEMPLE PL01 R AC $10,486 8,342 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
298 21 6,258 82 82 89
URSULA LN. BLACK MOUNTAIN END URSULA LN01 R AC/AC $23,458 8,586 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
600 20 14,000 85 84 91
Treatment Total $648,543
CAMINO MEDIO VISCAINO RD. END CAMINO ME01 501 24 12,024 R AC 0 86 85 86 $99 193,653 SEAL CRACKS LA CRESTA DR. 900' south of NINA 0
PL.

VISCAINO LACRES DR02 2,650 23 60,950 R AC 85 84 85 $543 197,783 SEAL CRACKS LA PALOMA RD. NEWBRIDGE DR ALTA TIERRA 0
RD.

LAPALO RD02 2,060 22 45,320 C AC/AC 79 77 79 $610 268,861 SEAL CRACKS LA PALOMA RD. ALTA TIERRA RD. PURISSIMA RD. LAPALO RD03 1,090 22 23,980 C AC/AC 0 90 88 89 $13 2,629,838 SEAL CRACKS MAGDALENA RD. STONEBROOK RAVENSBURY MAGDAL AV02 2,860 23 65,780 C AC/AC 0 80 79 81 $804 317,716 SEAL CRACKS Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 3 MTC StreetSaver

Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2026
OLD ALTOS RD. BURKE FREMONT OLDALT RD01 550 18 9,900 R AC/AC 0 73 72 75 $160 210,239 SEAL CRACKS OLD RANCH RD. RAVENSBURY RD. END OLDRRD RD01 696 33 22,968 R AC 91 89 90 $128 151,818 SEAL CRACKS ROBLE LADERA RD. VISCAINO DR. PURISSIMA DR. ROBLEL RD01 1,840 23 42,320 R AC/AC 0 73 72 74 $686 186,583 SEAL CRACKS SHOLES CT. ALEXANDER DR. END SHOLES CT01 405 18 8,590 R AC/AC 0 85 83 85 $69 220,653 SEAL CRACKS STORY HILL LN. PAGE MILL RD. END STORYH LN01 1,603 18 28,854 R AC/AC 0 89 88 89 $50 667,689 SEAL CRACKS SUMMITWOOD RD. TEPA WY LA LOMA DR SUMMIT RDO1 2,335 21 49,035 R AC/AC 88 87 88 $152 423,486 SEAL CRACKS TAAFFE RD. ELENA RD. DEZAHARA WAY TAAFFE RD01 3,240 20 64,800 C AC/AC 0 90 89 89 $19 3,872,910 SEAL CRACKS Treatment Total $3,332
Year 2026 Area Total 890,928 Year 2026 Total $1,196,419 Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2027
FREMONT RD. WEST EDITH BURKE RD. FREMON RD05 C AC 0 $284,425 7,644 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
2,254 24 54,096 75 70 100
LIDDICOAT DR ARASTRADERO 0
RD
LIDDICOAT CR LIDDIC DR01 R AC/AC $119,882 8,200 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
1,131 21 23,751 54 50 100
NATOMA RD. ELENA RD. BLACK 0
MOUNTAIN RD.

NATOMA RD01 C AC/AC $331,240 7,436 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
3,000 21 63,000 68 64 100
OLD PAGE MILL LN PAGE MILL RD CUL DE SAC OLDPAG LN01 R AC/AC 0 $28,316 8,273 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
255 22 5,610 52 48 100
STANFORD CT LIDDICOAT CR END STANFO CT01 R AC/AC 0 $58,753 8,139 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
540 16 11,640 52 49 100
Treatment Total $822,616
ELENA RD. NATOMA RD. LA BARRANCA 0
RD.

ELENA RD02 C AC/AC $124,384 8,720 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
3,000 23 69,000 91 89 94
ELENA RD. VINEDO LN. MOODY RD. ELENA RD05 C AC/AC 0 $103,563 8,017 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
2,298 25 57,450 74 71 80
ESTACADA DR. MANUELLA RD. MIRANDA RD ESTACA DR01 R AC 0 $49,524 8,264 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
1,015 28 28,420 82 81 88
Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 4 MTC StreetSaver

Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2027
HARVARD CT LIDDICOAT CR END HARVAR CT01 R AC/AC 0 $8,739 7,692 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
295 17 5,015 74 72 81
LA CRESTA CT. LA CRESTA DR. END LACRES CT01 R AC 0 $33,231 8,189 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
870 21 19,070 88 86 92
TERESA WY. STONEBROOK DR KATE DR TERESA WY01 R AC $10,741 5,296 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
250 22 5,500 72 69 78
VOORHEES DR. EL MONTE RD. 800 S. OF EL 0
MONTE RD.

VOORHE DR01 R AC/AC $37,814 8,145 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
800 25 21,700 79 78 86
Treatment Total $367,996
ALEJANDRO DR. ST.FRANCIS RD. END (SOUTH) ALEJAN DR01 393 20 7,860 R AC/AC 0 84 81 83 $85 186,151 SEAL CRACKS ANACAPA CT. ANACAPA DR. END ANACAP CT01 140 30 4,750 R AC/AC 0 90 88 89 $5 1,788,718 SEAL CRACKS ANACAPA DR. ASCENSION DR. ST. FRANCIS RD. ANACAP DR01 1,854 28 51,912 R AC 0 93 89 90 $308 147,156 SEAL CRACKS BEATRICE LN. ROBLEDA RD. END (CDS) BEATRI LN01 245 22 5,390 R AC 82 79 80 $70 181,676 SEAL CRACKS CANARIO WY. VISCAINO RD. END CANARI WY01 950 22 21,900 R AC 0 86 84 86 $196 316,462 SEAL CRACKS CONEJO CT. ASCENSION DR. END CONEJO CT01 310 18 6,315 R AC/AC 0 82 80 82 $75 228,483 SEAL CRACKS EDITH RD. FREMONT RD. 500' N/O 0
FREMONT RD.

EDITHR RD01 500 33 16,500 C AC 77 72 75 $285 166,797 SEAL CRACKS EL MONTE RD. (EB) FORK AT 950' W 0

OF STONEBROOK
DR.

SUMMERHILL ELMONT RD02 3,851 33 127,083 A AC/AC 92 88 89 $200 1,234,639 SEAL CRACKS FREMONT RD. MANUELLA RD. MIRANDA RD. FREMON RD03B 1,584 27 42,768 C AC/AC 0 80 78 80 $574 319,397 SEAL CRACKS GREEN HILLS CT. ELENA RD. END GREENH CT01 540 16 9,140 R AC/AC 0 86 83 85 $73 276,324 SEAL CRACKS LA BARRANCA RD PURISSIMA RD ELENA RD LABARR RD01 2,080 22 45,760 R AC/AC 0 86 84 85 $349 332,453 SEAL CRACKS LA CRESTA DR. ARASTRADERO 0
RD.
900' south of
NINA PL.

LACRES DR01 2,700 20 54,000 R AC/AC 83 81 82 $608 204,892 SEAL CRACKS LA CRESTA DR. VISCAINO END LACRES DR03 1,670 23 39,910 R AC/AC 0 88 85 87 $219 285,104 SEAL CRACKS LA PALOMA RD. FREMONT RD. NEWBRIDGE 0
DR.

LAPALO RD01 2,315 22 50,930 C AC/AC 92 88 89 $77 864,034 SEAL CRACKS LAUREL LN. CONCEPCION RD. END (CDS) LAUREL LN01 222 22 4,884 R AC/AC 87 85 86 $30 346,531 SEAL CRACKS MAGDALENA RD. RAVENSBURY EASTBROOK MAGDAL AV03 1,550 26 40,300 C AC/AC 0 92 88 89 $59 882,871 SEAL CRACKS MOODY RD. ALTAMONT RD. FRANCEMONT 0
AVE.

MOODY RD02 2,620 23 60,260 C AC/AC 80 76 78 $883 208,340 SEAL CRACKS OHLONE LN. FREMONT RD END OHLONE LN01 360 20 8,300 R AC 87 85 87 $68 250,995 SEAL CRACKS Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 5 MTC StreetSaver

Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2027
PURISSIMA RD. ARASTRADERO 0
RD.

ELENA RD. PURISS RD01 2,351 23 54,073 C AC/AC 92 88 89 $85 829,684 SEAL CRACKS PURISSIMA RD. ELENA RD. VISCAINO RD. PURISS RD02 1,660 22 36,520 C AC/AC 0 92 88 89 $58 829,684 SEAL CRACKS PURISSIMA RD. VISCAINO RD. CONCEPCION 0
RD.

PURISS RD03 3,222 23 74,106 C AC/AC 92 88 89 $117 829,684 SEAL CRACKS TAAFFE RD. DEZEHARA WAY 0
(S.)
ALTAMONT RD. TAAFFE RD02B 370 20 7,400 C AC/AC 79 76 78 $109 245,435 SEAL CRACKS VIA CORITA WY. NATOMA END VIACOR WY01 355 20 7,100 R AC/AC 0 90 88 89 $7 1,901,131 SEAL CRACKS VIA VENTANA WY BRIONES WY END VIAVEN WY02 452 18 8,136 R AC/AC 0 92 88 89 $5 1,646,854 SEAL CRACKS Treatment Total $4,546
Year 2027 Area Total 1,149,549 Year 2027 Total $1,195,158 Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2028
ALTAMONT RD. BLACK MOUNTAIN 0
RD.

TAAFFE RD. ALTAMO RD02 C AC/AC $390,946 7,243 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
2,979 24 71,496 70 64 100
MOODY RD. FRANCEMONT 0
AVE.
570 W/O
MURIETA LN.

MOODY RD03 C AC/AC $388,617 7,259 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
3,090 23 71,070 69 64 100
Treatment Total $779,564

ADOBE CREEK LODGE
RD.

MOODY RD END ADOBEC RD01 R AC $27,837 7,415 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
560 21 15,360 81 78 86
ALEJANDRO DR. ST. FRANCIS RD. END (NORTH) ALEJAN DR02 R AC 0 $11,189 7,608 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
294 21 6,174 89 86 93
ALICANTE LN. MANUELLA RD. END ALICAN LN01 R AC/AC 0 $22,788 5,967 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
670 16 11,220 73 70 79
BARTON CT. FREMONT RD. END BARTON CT01 R AC 0 $8,997 5,751 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
135 18 4,430 73 69 78
FREMONT RD. ST. FRANCIS DR. CONCEPCION 0
RD.

FREMON RD02 C AC/AC $58,587 7,445 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
1,250 25 31,250 83 79 87
Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 6 MTC StreetSaver

Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2028
HIDDEN SPRING CT. ALTAMONT RD. END HIDDEN CT01 R AC $9,597 4,808 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
105 25 4,725 74 69 78
HORSESHOE LN. ARASTRADERO 0
RD.

END HORSES LN01 R AC/AC $36,997 5,972 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
828 22 18,216 73 69 79
MAPLE LEAF CT. ELENA RD. CULDESAC MAPLEL CT01 R AC $5,460 6,239 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
131 23 3,013 80 78 86
NORMANDY LN. O'KEEFE LN. END NORMAN LN01 R AC/AC 0 $39,097 5,924 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
730 25 19,250 72 68 78
OKEEFE LN. 343' east of VISTA 0
SERENA
350' west of

VISTA SERENA
OKEEFE LN02 R AC $30,446 7,565 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
700 24 16,800 84 82 89
SADDLE CT. SADDLE 0
MOUNTAIN DR.

END SADDLE CT01 R AC $31,461 7,602 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
970 17 17,360 79 78 86
STONEBROOK DR. EL MONTE AVE. S/O PROSPECT 0
AVE.

STONEB DR01 C AC/AC $107,537 7,646 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
2,390 24 57,360 79 75 83
VOGUE CT. BLACK MOUNTAIN
RD.

END VOGUEC CT01 R AC/AC $21,693 7,582 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
570 21 11,970 79 76 85
Treatment Total $411,686
ANACAPA DR. VISCAINO RD ASCENSION DR. ANACAP DR02 1,300 25 32,500 R AC 0 79 75 78 $513 197,270 SEAL CRACKS ARASTRADERO RD. HORSESHOE LN. STIRRUP WY. ARASTR RD01 1,900 40 76,000 A AC/AC 0 82 79 81 $983 404,378 SEAL CRACKS

CAMINO HERMOSO RAVENSBURY
AVE. (NORTH)

RAVENSBURY
AVE. (SOUTH)
CAMINO DR01 3,190 20 63,800 A AC/AC 91 88 89 $92 2,195,291 SEAL CRACKS CARILLO LN. LA CRESTA DR. END CARILL LN01 450 20 9,800 R AC/AC 0 94 88 89 $8 1,235,256 SEAL CRACKS CONCEPTION RD. FREMONT RD. PURISSIMA RD. CONCEP RD01 4,604 20 92,080 C AC/AC 0 86 84 85 $727 384,511 SEAL CRACKS DAWN LN. ELENA RD. END DAWN LN01 400 22 9,300 R AC/AC 0 94 88 89 $7 1,332,367 SEAL CRACKS DEERFIELD DR. FREMONT RD. END DEERFI DR01 700 20 14,000 R AC/AC 0 94 88 89 $17 890,256 SEAL CRACKS DELSON CT ELENA RD END DELSON CT01 330 30 9,900 R AC/AC 0 94 88 89 $8 1,310,263 SEAL CRACKS EL MONTE RD. (WB) O'KEEFE LN. FORK AT 950' W 0
OF

STONEBROOK
DR.

ELMONT RD03 3,411 32 109,152 A AC/AC 87 85 86 $733 600,621 SEAL CRACKS FREMONT RD. CONCEPCION RD MANUELLA RD FREMON RD03A 1,084 27 29,268 C AC/AC 0 80 86 87 $156 677,017 SEAL CRACKS Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 7 MTC StreetSaver

Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2028
KINGSLEY AVE. ALTA DENA DR END KINGLY WY01 838 13 10,894 R AC/AC 95 88 89 $6 1,990,193 SEAL CRACKS MANUELLA RD. FREMONT ALICANTE MANUEL RD01 965 23 22,195 C AC/AC 0 60 87 88 $82 438,180 SEAL CRACKS MORA HEIGHTS WAY MORA GLEN DR. END MORAH WY01 480 24 11,520 R AC/AC 94 88 89 $7 1,798,261 SEAL CRACKS NATOMA RD. BLACK MOUNTAIN 0
RD.

LUCERO LN. NATOMA RD02 1,559 20 31,180 C AC/AC 81 78 80 $428 239,913 SEAL CRACKS ROBLEDA CT. ROBLEDA RD. END (CDS) ROBLEC CT01 573 20 11,460 R AC/AC 94 88 89 $9 1,266,269 SEAL CRACKS **ROBLEDA RD. CHAPIN ELENA ROBLED RD02 4,250 23 97,750 C AC 0 77 79 81 $1,269 214,738 SEAL CRACKS SNELL LN. FREMONT RD. END SNELL LN01 840 22 20,280 R AC/AC 0 94 88 89 $17 1,259,331 SEAL CRACKS TAAFFE RD. DEZAHARA WAY 0
(N.)

DEZAHARA WAY
(S.)
TAAFFE RD02A 1,082 20 21,640 C AC/AC 79 83 85 $184 358,863 SEAL CRACKS TWIN OAKS CT. ARASTRADERO
RD.

END TWINOA CT01 125 22 2,750 R AC 87 82 83 $31 172,532 SEAL CRACKS VIA FELIZ PAGE MILL RD. END VIAFEL FE01 1,480 20 29,600 R AC 0 82 77 79 $431 177,667 SEAL CRACKS VISCAINO RD. PURISSIMA RD. CONCEPCION 0
RD.

VISCAI RD01 3,456 23 79,488 R AC/AC 76 72 75 $1,386 184,076 SEAL CRACKS WEST LOYOLA DR. CAMINO

HERMOSA
HWY280
(EASTBROOK)
WLOYO DR01 4,762 21 100,002 A AC/AC 81 80 82 $1,242 478,712 SEAL CRACKS Treatment Total $8,336
Year 2028 Area Total 1,244,253 Year 2028 Total $1,199,585 Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2029
EDITH RD. FREMONT RD. 500' N/O 0
FREMONT RD.

EDITHR RD01 C AC $93,832 7,174 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
500 33 16,500 77 69 100
FREMONT RD. MIRANDA RD. WEST EDITH FREMON RD04 C AC/AC 0 $206,289 6,184 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
1,451 25 36,275 76 69 100
PAGE MILL RD. 75 FT S. OF 0

ARASTRADERO
RD
BERRY HILL CT PAGEMI RD00 C AC/AC $220,080 6,570 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
645 60 38,700 72 66 100
PURISSIMA RD. CONCEPCION RD. ROBLEDA RD. PURISS RD04 C AC/AC 0 $304,102 7,207 2" OVERLAY WITH

DIGOUTS
2,325 23 53,475 71 63 100
Treatment Total $824,304
Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 8 MTC StreetSaver

Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2029
JULIETTA LN SOUTH 0

PROPERTY LINE
OF 27340

JULIETTA LN
END JULIET LN01 R AC/AC $7,916 6,968 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
300 14 4,200 76 72 81
OKEEFE LN. 300' east of DIANE 343' east of 0

VISTA SERENA
OKEEFE LN01 R AC $68,209 5,851 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
1,404 23 32,292 74 69 78
OLIVE TREE CT. OLIVE TREE LN. END (CDS) OLIVEC CT01 R AC/AC $17,099 6,887 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
378 24 9,072 90 87 93
SAMUEL LN. PURISSIMA END SAM LN01 R AC/AC $8,293 6,947 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
220 20 4,400 82 78 86
SPRINGHILL DR. MANUELLA RD. END SPRING DR01 R AC 0 $14,870 5,176 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
320 22 7,040 70 64 74
WESTWIND WY CONCEPCION RD LA PALOMA RD WESTWI WY01 R AC/AC 0 $49,722 4,824 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
1,070 22 23,540 76 70 79
WEST LOYOLA DR. CAMINO

HERMOSA
HWY280
(EASTBROOK)
WLOYO DR01 A AC/AC $201,480 13,069 SURFACE SEAL W/

CRACK SEAL AND

DIGOUTS
4,762 21 100,002 81 80 88
Treatment Total $367,588
BURKE RD. CHAPIN RD. 100' N. of OLD 0
ALTOS RD./ COP
BURKE RD01 2,038 24 48,912 C AC/AC 65 87 88 $189 421,327 SEAL CRACKS **CORBETTA ALTAMONT RD END CORBET LN01 1,190 19 22,610 R AC/AC 0 47 87 88 $63 438,519 SEAL CRACKS EL MONTE RD. MOODY RD. FORK AT 950' W 0
OF

STONEBROOK
DR.

ELMONT RD01 1,890 36 68,040 A AC/AC 83 84 85 $582 390,638 SEAL CRACKS LA PALOMA RD. NEWBRIDGE DR ALTA TIERRA 0
RD.

LAPALO RD02 2,060 22 45,320 C AC/AC 79 75 77 $768 230,797 SEAL CRACKS LA PALOMA RD. ALTA TIERRA RD. PURISSIMA RD. LAPALO RD03 1,090 22 23,980 C AC/AC 0 90 84 86 $175 331,942 SEAL CRACKS LEANDER DR. PURISSIMA RD. END LEANDE DR01 530 21 12,630 R AC 0 68 72 75 $236 177,447 SEAL CRACKS MAGDALENA RD. STONEBROOK RAVENSBURY MAGDAL AV02 2,860 23 65,780 C AC/AC 0 80 77 79 $1,024 269,575 SEAL CRACKS MANUELLA RD. ALICANTE 400' north of 0
SCARFF
MANUEL RD02 2,450 24 58,800 C AC/AC 65 87 88 $227 421,327 SEAL CRACKS MOODY RD. ELENA RD. ALTAMONT RD. MOODY RD01 1,420 24 34,080 C AC/AC 0 80 83 85 $307 345,333 SEAL CRACKS NATOMA RD. LUCERO LN. ALTAMONT RD. NATOMA RD03 1,600 20 32,000 C AC/AC 0 73 77 79 $500 265,209 SEAL CRACKS Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 9 MTC StreetSaver

Area ID
Year:

Street Name Begin Location End Location Street ID Section ID FC Surface
Type Cost Rating Treatment
Current
Length Width Area PCI
PCI
Before
PCI
After
Treatment
2029
PAGE MILL RD. COUNTRY WY MATADERO 0

CREEK LN
PAGEMI RD03 2,548 24 61,152 C AC/AC 71 75 77 $1,039 247,495 SEAL CRACKS RAVENSBURY AVE. HILLPARK LN. END RAVENS AV02 2,612 23 60,076 A AC/AC 82 82 84 $605 343,140 SEAL CRACKS **SUNSET DR EAST BURKE RD END SUNSET DR01 1,550 15 23,250 R AC/AC 0 34 87 88 $65 438,519 SEAL CRACKS Treatment Total $5,780
Year 2029 Area Total 882,126 Year 2029 Total $1,197,672 Grand Total Section Area: 5,321,913 Grand Total $5,986,629 Interest: 4.00%
Town of Los Altos Hills Scenarios - Sections Selected for Treatment Inflation: 4.00% Printed: 3/12/2025
Scenario: 2025 S1- ANNUAL BUDGET 1.2M/YR
Scenarios Criteria:
** - Treatment from Project Selection 10 MTC StreetSaver

Appendix G
Quality Management Report

City of Los Altos Hill - PTAP25 PMP Update
Quality Management Report
Street ID Section ID Street Name Begin Location End Location # of
Lanes
FC ST
Length
(ft)
Width
(ft)
Area
(sf)
PCI Date PCI
Re-Inspected
PCI
ALEJAN DR02 ALEJANDRO DR. - ALEJAN ST. FRANCIS RD. END (NORTH) 2 R AC 294 21 6,174 8/30/2024 99 89 ALTOVE LN01 ALTO VERDE LN. - ALTOVE CONCEPCION RD. END 2 R AC 577 22 12,694 8/30/2024 68 68 AMHERS CT01 AMHERST CT - AMHERS LIDDICOAT DR END 2 R AC/AC 1,100 21 24,670 8/23/2024 71 71 BARLEY RD01 BARLEY HILL RD. - BARLEY HILLTOP DR. END 2 R AC/AC 1,745 16 27,920 9/3/2024 73 73 BENTLE CT01 BENTLEY CT. - BENTLE BURKE RD. END 2 R AC/AC 220 18 6,160 8/30/2024 74 74 DIANNE DR01 DIANNE DR. - DIANNE O'KEEFE LN. END 2 R AC/AC 1,200 23 27,600 8/22/2024 60 60 HORSES CT01 HORSESHOE CT. - HORSES HORSESHOE LN. END 2 R AC/AC 465 18 9,670 8/29/2024 76 78 KINGLY WY01 KINGSLEY AVE. - KINGLY ALTA DENA DR END 2 R AC/AC 838 13 10,894 10/7/2024 38 100 MIRAND CT01 MIRANDA CT. - MIRAND MIRANDA RD END 2 R AC/AC 265 23 7,920 8/29/2024 83 69 MIRAND WY01 MIRANDA WY. - MIRAND MIRANDA RD. END 2 R AC 350 23 9,875 8/29/2024 69 83 NINA PL01 NINA PL. - NINA LA CRESTA DR. END 2 R AC 785 23 19,165 8/28/2024 91 82 OLDPAG LN01 OLD PAGE MILL LN - OLDPAG PAGE MILL RD CUL DE SAC 2 R AC/AC 255 22 5,610 9/4/2024 93 53 PADRE CT01 PADRE CT. - PADRE ALTAMONT RD. END 2 R AC/AC 380 18 6,840 8/27/2024 99 99 REBECC LN01 REBECCA LN. - REBECC DAWSON DR. END 2 R AC/AC 900 18 16,200 9/3/2024 63 63 STANFO CT01 STANFORD CT - STANFO LIDDICOAT CR END 2 R AC/AC 540 16 11,640 8/23/2024 53 53 STIRRU WY01 STIRRUP WY. - STIRRU SADDLE MOUNTAIN RD. END 2 R AC 820 17 16,140 8/28/2024 68 68 SUNHIL DR01 SUNHILLS DR. - SUNHILLS WEST LOYOLA
245' S/O WEST
LAYOLA
2 R AC/AC 245 22 5,390 9/3/2024 75 75
SUNSET DR01 SUNSET DR EAST - SUNSET BURKE RD END 2 R AC/AC 1,550 15 23,250 8/30/2024 35 35 WILDPL LN01 WILD PLUM LN. - WILDPL MIRANDA RD. END 2 R AC/AC 650 20 14,500 8/29/2024 61 61 FC (Functional Classification): R (Residentials)
ST (Surface Type): AC (Asphalt Concrete), AC/AC (Asphalt Concrete Overlay) 1/1 2/21/2025

ITEM 5I Attachment 3

ITEM 5I Attachment 4

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 15, 2026
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS GRANTING EXTENSIONS FOR VARIOUS BUILDING PERMITS.

PREPARED BY: Tim McBirney, Community Development Analyst FROM: Jay Bradford, Community Development Director
APPROVED: Cody Einfalt, Acting City Manager
RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council approve resolutions granting the extension requests for the building permits outlined below, each with a new expiration date, as recommended in the individual staff reports, and detailed in the attachments.

DISCUSSION:

Property owners for the various projects listed below have requested time extensions for their building permits due to construction delays, primarily resulting from impacts such as contractor changes, project complexity and unexpected material procurement challenges, and/or adverse weather conditions experienced while construction was taking place. In accordance with the Town's Municipal Code, LAHMC Title 8 Chapter 10 Construction Time Limits, (https://ecode360.com/43997785#43997785) extensions are permissible where reasonable delays have occurred, and work remains incomplete. Each of these projects has not passed final inspection within the originally allotted time, but no fiscal impact is expected from the extensions.

The individual project details are as follows:

1. Lands of Lalitha & Peter—13800 Barton Court
Permit Number: BLD24-0573
Original Expiration Date: November 18, 2025
New Expiration Date: January 15, 2027
Attachment 4: Staff report and draft resolution for 13800 Barton Court Description: Upgrade from 200 Amp electric panel to 400 Amp main panel. Project was delayed due to delays with supply deliveries for other elements and PG&E. Project expected to completed in the spring of 2026.

2. Lands of Achim—26535 Altamont Road
Permit Number: BLD23-0495
ITEM 5J STAFF REPORT

City Council
Building Permit Extensions
January 15, 2026

Original Expiration Date: November 15, 2025
New Expiration Date: January 15, 2027
Attachment 5: Staff report and draft resolution for 26535 Altamont Road Description: Exterior Siding Remodel and Front Door Replacement. Project was delayed due to unforeseen scheduling conflicts and coordination with subcontractors.

3. Lands of Sheth Siddharth C Trustee & Krishnamurthy Kalpana Trustee—13051 La Paloma Road
Permit Number: BLD22-0415
Original Expiration Date: December 29, 2025
New Expiration Date: January 15, 2027
Attachment 3: Staff report and draft resolution for 13051 La Paloma Road Description: New ADU- 2 Bedroom, 2 Bathroom, & Kitchen. Project delayed due to low water flow and PSI requiring tank and pump system designed and approved by SCCFD.

4. Lands of Jackson & Thalapaneni Family Trust—23460 Camino Hermoso Permit Number: BLD24-0415
Original Expiration Date: November 26, 2025
New Expiration Date: January 15, 2027
Attachment 4: Staff report and draft resolution for 23460 Camino Hermoso

5. Description: Solar Panel Installation: 10 Modules. Project was delayed due to extended panel installation timeline. Lands of Alexander Geroge J and Katherine V Trustee— 11600 Summit Wood Road
Permit Number: BLD24-0087
Original Expiration Date: October 22, 2025
New Expiration Date: January 15, 2027
Attachment 5: Staff report and draft resolution for 11600 Summit Wood Road Description: 1250 SF Remodel: Kitchen, living, and dining rooms. Project delayed due to delayed delivery of window replacement causing a 10-month setback from the anticipated schedule.

The list above of projects, if approved, would result in a one-year extension from date of the City Council's approval. The approved permit extension resolutions would supersede any related conditions of approval in the planning entitlements and pem1itting compliance dates.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with these time extension requests as the applicant pays a fee for service covering the Town’s costs.
2024-25 CITY COUNCIL WORK PLAN:

City Council
Building Permit Extensions
January 15, 2026

This is not part of the 2024-25 City Council Work Plan as extensions are, depending on applicability, part of the standard site development approval process.

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Staff report and draft resolution for 13800 Barton Court

2. Staff report and draft resolution for 26535 Altamont Road

3. Staff report and draft resolution for 13051 La Paloma Road

4. Staff report and draft resolution for 23460 Camino Hermoso

5. Staff report and draft resolution for 11600 Summit Wood Road

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 15, 2026
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE

EXPIRATION DATE FOR A BUILDING PERMIT FOR AN UPGRADE
200 AMP PANEL TO 400 AMP MAIN PANEL, LANDS OF LALITHA
& PETER, 13800 BARTON COURT, PERMIT# BLD24-0573
PREPARED BY: Tim McBirney, Community Development Analyst FROM: Jay Bradford, Community Development Director
APPROVED: Cody Einfalt, Acting City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

Adopt the resolution (see Appendix 1) approving the extension request for Building Permit #BLD24-0573 with a new expiration date of January 15, 2027.

DISCUSSION:

The property owner is requesting an extension of Building Permits # BLD24-0573 at 13800 Barton Court that was originally issued on November 18, 2024. See Appendix 2 for a copy of the request. The project was delayed due to issues with supply deliveries for other elements and PG&E. Project expected to completed in spring. Non-residential construction projects with a valuation of $0 to 100,000 are limited to 12 months for completion following the issuance of the building permit. See Los Altos Hills Municipal Code, Title 8, Section 10.04 (https://ecode360.com/43997785), which shows the time limitations set by project type and value. Since the estimated value of the project is between $0 to $100,000, the building permits expired on November 18, 2025. The Construction Time Limits Ordinance does allow the extension of time limit by two six-month extensions if the extension request is made in the allotted time as described in Section 8-10.04. For this request, however, the City Council must consider the extension as all other extension options have been exhausted. The applicant has submitted a request for an extension for up to a year to complete the work, which is their third extension request. A copy of the inspection record for the project is attached as Appendix 3 to help give a better understanding of the project progress.

Staff recommends granting an extension to allow for additional inspections necessary for project closeout. With this approved permit extension, the applicant will have a year from City Council’s approval of this request to complete the project. Following a year, the applicant will have to pay the final deposit bond in an amount equal to the lesser of 10% of the estimated cost to complete the project, as determined by the Building Official, or $50,000 for which if they exceed the extension’s time limit, the applicant will face penalties again. In addition, they will be required to apply for another permit extension.

ITEM 5J ATTACHMENT 1

City Council
13800 Barton Court
January 15, 2026

The above project, if approved, would result in a one-year extension from the City Council’s approval. The approved permit extension resolution would supersede any related conditions of approval in the planning entitlements and permitting compliance dates.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed request is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), which exempts actions that can be seen with certainty will not cause significant environmental impacts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with these time extension requests as the applicant pays a fee for service covering the Town’s costs.
2024-25 CITY COUNCIL WORK PLAN:

This is not part of the 2024-25 City Council Work Plan as extensions are, depending on applicability, part of the standard site development approval process.

APPENDIX:

1. Resolution Approving Time Extension for 13800 Barton Court, BLD24-0573

2. Building Permit Extension Requests

3. BLD24-0573 Inspection Record

City Council
13800 Barton Court
January 15, 2026

RESOLUTION ____-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION OF A PERMIT FOR AN UPGRADE 200 AMP PANEL TO 400 AMP MAIN PANEL
WHEREAS, Vaidyanathan Lalitha and Jackson Peter (“Owners”) owns the property commonly known as 13800 Barton Court, Los Altos Hills, California (175-25-058); and WHEREAS, the building permits #BLD24-0573 for an upgrade of 200-amp panel to 400-amp main panel on November 18, 2024, with reasonable conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the permits expired on November 18, 2025, as the Town has adopted a Construction Time Limits Ordinance and, pursuant thereto, sets an expiration date for Building Permits for non-residential projects with a valuation between $0 and $100,000 at twelve (12) months; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Construction Time Limits Ordinance, the City Council has the authority to grant reasonable extensions of time for Building Permits that have expired; and WHEREAS, the Town generally grants time extensions of one (1) calendar year; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does hereby approve on behalf of the Owners, a one (1) year Time Extension of approved Building Permit # BLD24-0573, subject to the originally adopted conditions.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of January 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
Rajiv Bhateja, Mayor
ATTEST: ______________________________
Arika Miller, City Clerk

Permit Inspections
Town of Los Altos Hills

LIST OF INSPECTIONS
SEQ

ID SCHEDULED DATE COMPLETED DATE TYPE INSPECTOR RESULT REMARKS 12/31/2025 PM 12/31/2025
634 BLD ELECTRIC
METER

AUTHORIZATION
Chris Brown PARTIAL PM SAL 650-814-3026
Notes:
200 amp service
This service is for main house panel upgrade will need to schedule inspection for ADU Permit Number: BLD24-0573
Site Address: 13800 BARTON COURT
City, State Zip Code: LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA
Applied: 11/6/2024 Approved: 11/18/2024
Issued: 11/18/2024
Parent Permit:

Parent Project:

Applicant: NCI ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Owner: VAIDYANATHAN LALITHA AND JACKSON PETER
Contractor: NCI ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Description: UPGRADE FROM 200AMP TO 400 AMP MAIN PANEL
Finaled:

Status: ISSUED
Details:

Printed: Friday, 09 January, 2026 1 of 1

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 15, 2026
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE

EXPIRATION DATE FOR A BUILDING PERMIT FOR EXTERIOR

SIDING REMODEL AND FRONT ENTRY DOOR REPLACEMENT,
LANDS OF JA INVESTMENTS LLC, 26535 ALTAMONT ROAD,
PERMIT# BLD23-0495
PREPARED BY: Tim McBirney, Community Development Analyst FROM: Jay Bradford, Community Development Director
APPROVED: Cody Einfalt, Acting City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

Adopt the resolution (see Appendix 1) approving the extension request for Building Permit # BLD23-0495 with a new expiration date of January 15, 2027.

DISCUSSION:

The property owner is requesting an extension of Building Permits # BLD23-0495 at 26535 Altamont Road that was originally issued on May 15, 2024. See Appendix 2 for a copy of the request. Project was delayed due to delays with supply deliveries for other elements and PG&E.

Project expected to completed in spring. Remodels without additions are limited to a 12-month completion timeline from the issuance of the building permit if the estimated value of the project is between $100,001 to $250,000. See Los Altos Hills Municipal Code, Title 8, Section 10.04 (https://ecode360.com/43997785), which shows the time limitations set by project type and value. Since the estimated value of the project is between $100,001 and $250,000, the building permits expired on November 15, 2025. The Construction Time Limits Ordinance does allow the extension of time limit by two six-month extensions if the extension request is made in the allotted time as described in Section 8-10.04. For this request, however, the City Council must consider the extension as all other extension options have been exhausted. The applicant has submitted a request for an extension for up to a year to complete the work, which is their third extension request. A copy of the inspection record for the project is attached as Appendix 3 to help give a better understanding of the project progress.

Staff recommends granting an extension to allow for additional inspections necessary for project closeout. With this approved permit extension, the applicant will have a year from City Council’s approval of this request to complete the project. Following a year, the applicant will have to pay the final deposit bond in an amount equal to the lesser of 10% of the estimated cost to complete the project, as determined by the Building Official, or $50,000 for which if they exceed the ITEM 5J ATTACHMENT 2

City Council
26535 Altamont Road
January 15, 2026

extension’s time limit, the applicant will face penalties again. In addition, they will be required to apply for another permit extension.

The above project, if approved, would result in a one-year extension from the City Council’s approval. The approved permit extension resolution would supersede any related conditions of approval in the planning entitlements and permitting compliance dates.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed request is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), which exempts actions that can be seen with certainty will not cause significant environmental impacts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with these time extension requests as the applicant pays a fee for service covering the Town’s costs.
2024-25 CITY COUNCIL WORK PLAN:

This is not part of the 2024-25 City Council Work Plan as extensions are, depending on applicability, part of the standard site development approval process.

APPENDIX:

1. Resolution Approving Time Extension for 26535 Altamont Road, BLD23-0495

2. Building Permit Extension Requests

3. BLD23-0495 Inspection Record

City Council
26535 Altamont Road
January 15, 2026

RESOLUTION ____-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS

APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION OF A PERMIT FOR EXTERIOR SIDING

REMODEL AND FRONT DOOR REPLACEMENT
WHEREAS, Ja Investments LLC (“Owners”) owns the property commonly known as 26535 Altamont Road, Los Altos Hills, California (APN 182-45-027); and WHEREAS, the building permits #BLD23-0495 for exterior siding remodel and front door replacement issued on May 15, 2024, with reasonable conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the permits expired on November 15, 2025, as the Town has adopted a Construction Time Limits Ordinance and, pursuant thereto, sets an expiration date for Building Permits for remodels without additions with a project valuation between $100,001 and $250,000 at eighteen (18) months; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Construction Time Limits Ordinance, the City Council has the authority to grant reasonable extensions of time for Building Permits that have expired; and WHEREAS, the Town generally grants time extensions of one (1) calendar year; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does hereby approve on behalf of the Owners, a one (1) year Time Extension of approved Building Permit # BLD23-0495, subject to the originally adopted conditions.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of January 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
Rajiv Bhateja, Mayor
ATTEST: ______________________________
Arika Miller, City Clerk

Permit Inspections
Town of Los Altos Hills

LIST OF INSPECTIONS
SEQ

ID SCHEDULED DATE COMPLETED DATE TYPE INSPECTOR RESULT REMARKS Notes:

Permit Number: BLD23-0495
Site Address: 26535 ALTAMONT ROAD
City, State Zip Code: LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022
Applied: 8/29/2023 Approved: 5/15/2024
Issued: 5/15/2024
Parent Permit:

Parent Project:

Applicant: REDHORSE CONSTRUCTORS LLC
Owner: JA INVESTMENTS LLC
Contractor: REDHORSE CONSTRUCTORS LLC
Description: Exterior siding remodel and front entry door replacement Finaled:

Status: EXPIRED
Details:

MUST SUBMIT COMPLETED SPECIAL INSPECTION FORM FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. emailed 3/28/24 (MGUZ)
Printed: Friday, 09 January, 2026 1 of 1

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 15, 2026
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EXPIRATION DATE FOR A BUILDING PERMIT FOR NEW ADU- 2
BEDROOM, 2 BATHROOM, & KITCHEN, LANDS OF SHETH

SIDDHARTH C TRUSTEE & KRISHNAMURTHY KALPANA
TRUSTEE, 13051 LA PALOMA ROAD, PERMIT # BLD22-0415.

PREPARED BY: Tim McBirney, Community Development Analyst FROM: Jay Bradford, Community Development Director
APPROVED: Cody Einfalt, Acting City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

Adopt the resolution (see Appendix 1) approving the extension request for Building Permit #BLD22-0415 with a new expiration date of January 15, 2027.

DISCUSSION:

The property owner is requesting an extension of Building Permit # BLD22-0415 at 13051 La Paloma Road that was originally issued on June 29, 2023. See Appendix 2 for a copy of the request. Project was initially delayed due to Covid 19. The project is currently in process. New residence construction is limited to 18 months following the issuance of the building permit if the estimated value of the project is between $0 to $250,000. See Los Altos Hills Municipal Code, Title 8, Section 10.04 (https://ecode360.com/43997785), which shows the time limitations set by project type and value. Since the estimated value of the project is between $0 to $250,000, the building permits expired on December 29, 2025. The Construction Time Limits Ordinance does allow the extension of time limit by two six-month extensions if the extension request is made in the allotted time as described in Section 8-10.04. For this request, however, the City Council must consider the extension as all other extension options have been exhausted. The applicant has submitted a request for an extension for up to a year to complete the work, which is their third extension request. A copy of the inspection record for the project is attached as Appendix 3 to help give a better understanding of the project progress.

Staff recommends granting an extension to allow for additional inspections necessary for project closeout. With this approved permit extension, the applicant will have a year from City Council’s approval of this request to complete the project. Following a year, the applicant will have to pay the final deposit bond in an amount equal to the lesser of 10% of the estimated cost to complete the project, as determined by the Building Official, or $50,000 for which if they exceed the extension’s time limit, the applicant will face penalties again. In addition, they will be required to apply for another permit extension.

ITEM 5J ATTACHMENT 3

City Council
13051 La Paloma Road
January 15, 2026

The above project, if approved, would result in a one-year extension from the City Council’s approval. The approved permit extension resolution would supersede any related conditions of approval in the planning entitlements and permitting compliance dates.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed request is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), which exempts actions that can be seen with certainty will not cause significant environmental impacts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with these time extension requests as the applicant pays a fee for service covering the Town’s costs.
2024-25 CITY COUNCIL WORK PLAN:

This is not part of the 2024-25 City Council Work Plan as extensions are, depending on applicability, part of the standard site development approval process.

APPENDIX:

1. Resolution Approving Time Extension for 13051 La Paloma Road, BLD22-0415

2. Building Permit Extension Requests

3. BLD22-0415 Inspection Record

City Council
13051 La Paloma Road
January 15, 2026

RESOLUTION ____-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION OF A NEW ADU- 2 BEDROOM, 2 BATHROOM, & KITCHEN
WHEREAS, Sheth Siddharth C Trustee & Krishnamurthy Kalpana Trustee (“Owners”) owns the property commonly known as 13051 La Paloma Road, Los Altos Hills, California (APN 175-47- 002); and
WHEREAS, the building permit # BLD22-0415 for a new ADU- 2 Bedroom, 2 Bathroom, & Kitchen issued on June 29, 2023, with reasonable conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the permits expired on December 29, 2025, as the Town has adopted a Construction Time Limits Ordinance and, pursuant thereto, sets an expiration date for Building Permits for new dwellings and remodels with additions with a project valuation between $0 and $250,000 at eighteen (18) months; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Construction Time Limits Ordinance, the City Council has the authority to grant reasonable extensions of time for Building Permits that have expired; and WHEREAS, the Town generally grants time extensions of one (1) calendar year; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does hereby approve on behalf of the Owners, a one (1) year Time Extension of approved Building Permit # BLD22-0415, subject to the originally adopted conditions.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of January 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
Rajiv Bhateja, Mayor
ATTEST: ______________________________
Arika Miller, City Clerk

Permit Inspections
Town of Los Altos Hills

LIST OF INSPECTIONS
SEQ

ID SCHEDULED DATE COMPLETED DATE TYPE INSPECTOR RESULT REMARKS 7/5/2023 7/5/2023 9:00
AM

RETAINING WALL
REBAR CSG INSPECTOR PASS Live - AM
Notes:
details SD4 #4
7/10/2023 7/10/2023 RETAINING WALL
REBAR CSG INSPECTOR PARTIAL Live Babak
Notes:

Retaining wall for eastern wall of house - Rebar pass - pending letters from EOR and Soils. 7/20/2023 7/20/2023 UNDERSLAB
PLUMBING CSG INSPECTOR FAIL Live Babak
Notes:
not ready - missing drains and vents
7/24/2023 7/25/2023 UNDERSLAB
PLUMBING CSG INSPECTOR PASS Live Babak
Notes:
7/25/2023 7/25/2023 SLAB STEEL CSG INSPECTOR PARTIAL Live Babak Notes:
pending letters from soils, EOR
8/9/2023 8/9/2023 SLAB STEEL CSG INSPECTOR PASS Live Babak Notes:

ADU PATIO SLAB
10/25/2023 10/26/2023 EXTERIOR SHEAR
WALL HOLDOWNS CSG INSPECTOR PASS Live - PM
Notes:
11/21/2023 2:00
PM 11/21/2023 UNDERGROUND SEWER

BABAK MADANI
CSG CORRECTIONS Live - Babak
Notes:

Needs property line clean out. Backflow, Water tes.

Permit Number: BLD22-0415
Site Address: 13051-A LA PALOMA ROAD
City, State Zip Code: LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA
Applied: 8/30/2022 Approved: 6/29/2023
Issued: 6/29/2023
Parent Permit:

Parent Project:

Applicant: Avery Cobe
Owner: SHETH SIDDHARTH C TRUSTEE KRISHNAMURTHY KALPANA

TRUSTEE
Contractor: DMD General Construction INC
Description: NEW ADU CONTAINING 2 BEDROOMS, 2 BATHROOMS,

KITCHEN
Finaled:

Status: ISSUED
Details:

Printed: Friday, 09 January, 2026 1 of 3

Permit Inspections
Town of Los Altos Hills
11/28/2023 10:00
AM 11/28/2023 UNDERGROUND SEWER

BABAK MADANI
CSG PASS AM Phil 408-838-4490
Notes:
4/18/2024 AM 4/18/2024
621 BLD

DIAPHRAGM

NAILING
Chris Brown PASS
Notes:
7/10/2025 8:00
AM 7/10/2025 613 INSULATION CSG INSPECTOR PASS PM Phil 408-838-4490 Notes:

CSG Inspector Juan Serrano – 831-442-4655: CLOSE SOFFIT EVE INSULATION OK 7/29/2025 AM 7/29/2025
626 BLD EXTERIOR

WEATHER

PROOFING
CSG INSPECTOR PASS AM Phil 408-838-4490
Notes:

CSG Juan Serrano Weather Proofing: Approved Full Wrap & Densglass completed. 9/29/2025 PM 9/29/2025 615 BLD ALL
ROUGH Chris Brown NOT READY PM Phil 408-838-4490
Notes:
needs fire sprinklers
12/8/2025 AM 12/8/2025 615 BLD ALL
ROUGH Chris Brown PARTIAL AM eTRAKiT Inspection Request Notes:
11/25/2025 12:55 PM DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Contact Name: DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Site Address: 13051-A LA PALOMA ROAD
Phone: 4083732911
e-Mail: [email protected]
HVAC and electrical OK
12/8/2025 AM 12/8/2025
634 BLD ELECTRIC
METER

AUTHORIZATION
Chris Brown NOT READY AM eTRAKiT Inspection Request
Notes:
11/25/2025 12:55 PM DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Contact Name: DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Site Address: 13051-A LA PALOMA ROAD
Phone: 4083732911
e-Mail: [email protected]
Printed: Friday, 09 January, 2026 2 of 3

Permit Inspections
Town of Los Altos Hills
12/11/2025 PM 12/11/2025 627 BLD STUCCO
LATH Chris Brown PASS pm eTRAKiT Inspection Request
Notes:
12/9/2025 12:29 AM DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Contact Name: DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Site Address: 13051-A LA PALOMA ROAD
Phone: 4083732911
e-Mail: [email protected]
12/11/2025 12/11/2025 617 BLD ROUGH
PLUMBING Chris Brown PASS
Notes:
12/18/2025 PM 12/18/2025
634 BLD ELECTRIC
METER

AUTHORIZATION
Chris Brown PASS PM Phil 408-838-4490
Notes:
200 amp
12/22/2025 PM 12/22/2025 613 INSULATION Chris Brown PASS PM PHIL 4083732911 Notes:
12/12/2025 8:00 AM DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Contact Name: DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Site Address: 13051-A LA PALOMA ROAD
Phone: 4083732911
e-Mail: [email protected]
12/29/2025 PM 12/29/2025 622 BLD DRYWALL
NAILING Chris Brown PASS PM eTRAKiT Inspection Requestr Notes:
12/15/2025 7:20 PM DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Contact Name: DMD GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC
Site Address: 13051-A LA PALOMA ROAD
Phone: 4083732911
e-Mail: [email protected]
Printed: Friday, 09 January, 2026 3 of 3

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 15, 2026
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE

EXPIRATION DATE FOR A BUILDING PERMIT FOR SOLAR PANEL
INSTALLATION: 10 MODULES, LANDS OF JACKSON &
THALAPANENI FAMILY TRUST, 23460 CAMINO HERMOSO,
PERMIT # BLD24-0602
PREPARED BY: Tim McBirney, Community Development Analyst FROM: Jay Bradford, Community Development Director
APPROVED: Cody Einfalt, Acting City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

Adopt the resolution (see Appendix 1) approving the extension request for Building Permit # BLD24-0602 with a new expiration date of January 15, 2027.

DISCUSSION:

The property owner is requesting an extension of Building Permits # BLD24-0602 at 23460 Camino Hermoso that was originally issued on November 26, 2024. See Appendix 2 for a copy of the request. Project was delayed because homeowner has not concluded timeline of installation. The project is currently in process. Non-residential construction with a valuation between $0 and $100,000 is limited to a completion timeframe of 12 months following the issuance of the building permit. See Los Altos Hills Municipal Code, Title 8, Section 10.04 (https://ecode360.com/43997785), which shows the time limitations set by project type and value. Since the estimated value of the project is between $0 to $100,000 , the building permits expired on November 26, 2025. The Construction Time Limits Ordinance does allow the extension of time limit by two six-month extensions if the extension request is made in the allotted time as described in Section 8-10.04. For this request, however, the City Council must consider the extension as all other extension options have been exhausted. The applicant has submitted a request for an extension for up to a year to complete the work, which is their third extension request. A copy of the inspection record for the project is attached as Appendix 3 to help give a better understanding of the project progress.

Staff recommends granting an extension to allow for additional inspections necessary for project closeout. With this approved permit extension, the applicant will have a year from City Council’s approval of this request to complete the project. Following a year, the applicant will have to pay the final deposit bond in an amount equal to the lesser of 10% of the estimated cost to complete the project, as determined by the Building Official, or $50,000 for which if they exceed the ITEM 5J ATTACHMENT 4

City Council
23460 Camino Hermoso
January 15, 2026

extension’s time limit, the applicant will face penalties again. In addition, they will be required to apply for another permit extension.

The above project, if approved, would result in a one-year extension from the City Council’s approval. The approved permit extension resolution would supersede any related conditions of approval in the planning entitlements and permitting compliance dates.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed request is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), which exempts actions that can be seen with certainty will not cause significant environmental impacts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with these time extension requests as the applicant pays a fee for service covering the Town’s costs.
2024-25 CITY COUNCIL WORK PLAN:

This is not part of the 2024-25 City Council Work Plan as extensions are, depending on applicability, part of the standard site development approval process.

APPENDIX:

1. Resolution Approving Time Extension for 23460 Camino Hermoso, BLD24-0602

2. Building Permit Extension Requests

3. BLD24-0602 Inspection Record

City Council
23460 Camino Hermoso
January 15, 2026

RESOLUTION ____-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS

APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION OF A PERMIT FOR SOLAR PANEL
INSTALLATION: 10 MODULES
WHEREAS, Jackson & Thalapaneni Family Trust (“Owners”) owns the property commonly known as 23460 Camino Hermoso, Los Altos Hills, California (APN 336-37-014); and WHEREAS, the building permits # BLD24-0602 for a pool and spa installation issued on November 26, 2024, with reasonable conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the permits expired on November 26, 2025, as the Town has adopted a Construction Time Limits Ordinance and, pursuant thereto, sets an expiration date for Building Permits for non-residential projects with a valuation between $0 and $100,000 at twelve (12) months; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Construction Time Limits Ordinance, the City Council has the authority to grant reasonable extensions of time for Building Permits that have expired; and WHEREAS, the Town generally grants time extensions of one (1) calendar year; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does hereby approve on behalf of the Owners, a one (1) year Time Extension of approved Building Permit # BLD24-0602, subject to the originally adopted conditions.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of January 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
Rajiv Bhateja, Mayor
ATTEST: ______________________________
Arika Miller, City Clerk

Permit Inspections
Town of Los Altos Hills

LIST OF INSPECTIONS
SEQ

ID SCHEDULED DATE COMPLETED DATE TYPE INSPECTOR RESULT REMARKS 8/20/2024 PM 8/20/2024 618 BLD ROUGH
ELECTRICAL Chris Brown PASS PM FRED 650-703-6820
Notes:
9/3/2024 PM 9/3/2024 999 BUILDING
FINAL** Chris Brown PASS pm fred 650-703-6820
Notes:

Permit Number: BLD24-0415
Site Address: 25111 LA LOMA DRIVE
City, State Zip Code: LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA
Applied: 8/12/2024 Approved: 8/12/2024
Issued: 8/12/2024
Parent Permit:

Parent Project:

Applicant: KALINNA ELECTRIC INC
Owner: HUANG JACKSON T AND ALICE Y TRUSTEE
Contractor: KALINNA ELECTRIC INC
Description: CHANGE MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE 200AMP RECESS

SUBPANEL
Finaled: 9/3/2024
Status: FINALED
Details:

CHANGE MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE LIKE FOR LIKE 200AMP TO 200AMP RECESS SUBPANEL Printed: Friday, 09 January, 2026 1 of 1

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 15, 2026
Staff Report to the City Council
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF THE EXPIRATION DATE FOR A BUILDING PERMIT FOR 1250 SF
REMODEL: KITCHEN, LIVING, AND DINING ROOM, LANDS OF
ALEXANDER GEROGE J AND KATHERINE V TRUSTEE, 11600
SUMMIT WOOD ROAD, PERMIT# BLD24-0087
PREPARED BY: Tim McBirney, Community Development Analyst FROM: Jay Bradford, Community Development Director
APPROVED: Cody Einfalt, Acting City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

Adopt the resolution (see Appendix 1) approving the extension request for Building Permit # BLD24-0087 with a new expiration date of January 15, 2027.

DISCUSSION:

The property owner is requesting an extension of Building Permits # BLD24-0087 at 11600 Summit Wood Road that was originally issued on April 22, 2024. See Appendix 2 for a copy of the request. Project delayed due to delayed delivery of window replacement that delayed the project by 10 months. The project is currently in process. Remodels without additions are limited to a completion timeline of 18 months following the issuance of the building permit if the estimated value of the project is between $100,001 and $250,000. See Los Altos Hills Municipal Code, Title 8, Section 10.04 (https://ecode360.com/43997785), which shows the time limitations set by project type and value. Since the estimated value of the project is between $100,001 and $250,000, the building permits expired on October 22, 2025. The Construction Time Limits Ordinance does allow the extension of time limit by two six-month extensions if the extension request is made in the allotted time as described in Section 8-10.04. For this request, however, the City Council must consider the extension as all other extension options have been exhausted.

The applicant has submitted a request for an extension for up to a year to complete the work, which is their third extension request. A copy of the inspection record for the project is attached as Appendix 3 to help give a better understanding of the project progress.

Staff recommends granting an extension to allow for additional inspections necessary for project closeout. With this approved permit extension, the applicant will have a year from City Council’s approval of this request to complete the project. Following a year, the applicant will have to pay the final deposit bond in an amount equal to the lesser of 10% of the estimated cost to complete the project, as determined by the Building Official, or $50,000 for which if they exceed the ITEM 5J ATTACHMENT 5

City Council
23460 Camino Hermosos
Drive
January 15, 2026

extension’s time limit, the applicant will face penalties again. In addition, they will be required to apply for another permit extension.

The above project, if approved, would result in a one-year extension from the City Council’s approval. The approved permit extension resolution would supersede any related conditions of approval in the planning entitlements and permitting compliance dates.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed request is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), which exempts actions that can be seen with certainty will not cause significant environmental impacts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with these time extension requests as the applicant pays a fee for service covering the Town’s costs.
2024-25 CITY COUNCIL WORK PLAN:

This is not part of the 2024-25 City Council Work Plan as extensions are, depending on applicability, part of the standard site development approval process.

APPENDIX:

1. Resolution Approving Time Extension for 11600 Summit Wood Road, BLD24-0087

2. Building Permit Extension Requests

3. BLD24-0087 Inspection Record

City Council
23460 Camino Hermosos
Drive
January 15, 2026

RESOLUTION ____-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION OF A 1250 SF REMODEL: KITCHEN, LIVING,

AND DINING ROOMS
WHEREAS, Alexander Geroge J and Katherine V Trustee (“Owners”) owns the property commonly known as 11600 Summit Wood Road, Los Altos Hills, California (APN 336-22-019); and
WHEREAS, the building permits # BLD24-0087 for 1250 SF Remodel: Kitchen, living, and dining rooms issued on April 22, 2024, with reasonable conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the permits expired on October 22, 2025, as the Town has adopted a Construction Time Limits Ordinance and, pursuant thereto, sets an expiration date for Building Permits for remodels without additions with a project valuation between $100,001 and $250,000 at eighteen (18) months; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Construction Time Limits Ordinance, the City Council has the authority to grant reasonable extensions of time for Building Permits that have expired; and WHEREAS, the Town generally grants time extensions of one (1) calendar year; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills does hereby approve on behalf of the Owners, a one (1) year Time Extension of approved Building Permit # BLD24-0087, subject to the originally adopted conditions.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of January 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
Rajiv Bhateja, Mayor
ATTEST: ______________________________
Arika Miller, City Clerk

Permit Inspections
Town of Los Altos Hills

LIST OF INSPECTIONS
SEQ

ID SCHEDULED DATE COMPLETED DATE TYPE INSPECTOR RESULT REMARKS 8/7/2024 AM 8/7/2024 610 BLD
FOUNDATION Chris Brown PASS eTRAKiT Inspection Request
Notes:
8/2/2024 7:04 AM DOWELL CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT INC
Contact Name: DOWELL CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT INC
Site Address: 11600 SUMMIT WOOD ROAD
Phone: 6502604590
e-Mail: [email protected]
9/23/2024 AM 9/23/2024 619 BLD ROUGH
FRAMING Chris Brown PASS AM ROBIN 650-387-1308
Notes:
9/23/2024 9/23/2024 619 BLD ROUGH
FRAMING Chris Brown PASS
Notes:

Under-floor framing
9/26/2024 AM 9/26/2024 617 BLD ROUGH
PLUMBING Chris Brown PASS eTRAKiT Inspection Request
Notes:
9/24/2024 1:25 PM DOWELL CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT INC
under floor plumbing inspection
Contact Name: DOWELL CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT INC
Site Address: 11600 SUMMIT WOOD ROAD
Phone: 6503871308
e-Mail: [email protected]
11/18/2024 AM 11/18/2024 619 BLD ROUGH
FRAMING Chris Brown PASS am robbie 650-387-1308
Notes:

Roof and exterior nail
Permit Number: BLD24-0087
Site Address: 11600 SUMMIT WOOD ROAD
City, State Zip Code: LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA
Applied: 2/12/2024 Approved: 4/22/2024
Issued: 4/22/2024
Parent Permit:

Parent Project:

Applicant: DOWELL CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT INC
Owner: ALEXANDER GEORGE J AND KATHARINE V TRUSTEE
Contractor: DOWELL CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT INC
Description: REMODEL KITCHEN LIVING DINING 1,250 SQ. FT. REDESIGN

THE MAI
Finaled:

Status: ISSUED
Details:

Printed: Friday, 09 January, 2026 1 of 1

ITEM 5K
UPDATED 1.13.26

ITEM 5K Attachment 1
RESOLUTION No. xx-26

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS ACCEPTING THE TOWN’S ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025
WHEREAS, the independent audit provides annual reports on the financial condition of the Town in accordance with Municipal Code Section 2-3.221;
WHEREAS, the Town of Los Altos Hills contracted with the audit firm of Maze and Associates (Maze) to conduct an audit of the Town’s financial records in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB); and
WHEREAS, the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2025 was prepared in accordance with all relevant GASB pronouncement and best practices set by the Governmental Finance Officers Association and reviewed by Maze for fair presentation and free from material misstatement; and
WHEREAS, it is recommended that the City Council accept the Town’s ACFR for the year ended June 30, 2025 (by reference, available with the staff report); NOW THEREFORE, resolved by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills that the Council hereby accepts the Town’s annual financial statements as prepared by Maze and Associates.

The above and foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the Town of Los Altos Hills at a special meeting held on the 15th day of January 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

BY: _______________________________
Rajiv Bhateja, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Arika Birdsong-Miller, City Clerk

Town of Los Altos Hills

ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE

FINANCIAL REPORT
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2025
ITEM 5K Attachment 2
UPDATED 1.15.26

ANNUAL

COMPREHENSIVE

FINANCIAL REPORT
For the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2025
Town of Los Altos Hills, California

PREPARED BY

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

This page intentionally left blank

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTORY SECTION
Letter of Transmittal ........................................................................................................................................... i Town Organizational Chart ............................................................................................................................... vi Town Officers .................................................................................................................................................. vii City Council ..................................................................................................................................................... viii GFOA Certificate of Achievement .................................................................................................................... ix

FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditor’s Report ......................................................................................................................... 1 Management’s Discussion and Analysis ........................................................................................................... 5 Basic Financial Statements
Government-wide Financial Statements:

Statement of Net Position ................................................................................................................. 26 Statement of Activities ...................................................................................................................... 27 Fund Financial Statements:

Balance Sheets – Governmental Funds ............................................................................................ 30 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Government-Wide Statement of Net Position ........................................................................ 31 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Governmental Funds ..................................................................................................................... 32 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances to the Government-Wide
Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Position .................................................................... 33 Statement of Fund Net Position – Proprietary Funds ....................................................................... 36 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position – Proprietary Funds ........... 37 Statement of Cash Flows – Proprietary Funds .................................................................................. 38 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position – Fiduciary Funds .................................................................... 40 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position – Fiduciary Funds .................................................. 41 Notes to Basic Financial Statements ............................................................................................... 43

FINANCIAL SECTION (Continued)
Required Supplemental Information
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual – General Fund ................................................................................................................................... 78 Schedule of Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability ............................................................. 79 Schedule of Contributions – Cost-Sharing Multiple-Employer Defined Pension Plan ......................... 80 Schedule of Changes in the Town’s Net OEPB Liability and Related Ratios ......................................... 81 Schedule of OPEB Contributions .......................................................................................................... 82 Notes to the Required Supplementary Information ............................................................................ 83 Supplemental Information
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance – Budget and Actual:

Street Capital Projects Fund ............................................................................................................ 86 Other Capital Projects Fund ............................................................................................................ 87 Sewer Enterprise Fund .................................................................................................................... 88 Nonmajor Governmental Funds:

Combining Balance Sheets .............................................................................................................. 90 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances ........................ 91 Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances – Budget and Actual ......................................................................................................................... 92

STATISTICAL SECTION
Net Position by Component ........................................................................................................................... 96 Changes in Net Position .................................................................................................................................. 98 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ................................................................................................... 102 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds ..................................................................................... 104 Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Taxable Property ......................................................................... 106 Property Tax Rates – Direct and Overlapping Governments ....................................................................... 107 Principal Taxpayers ....................................................................................................................................... 108 Property Tax Levies and Collections ............................................................................................................. 109 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type............................................................................................................. 110 Direct and Overlapping Debt ........................................................................................................................ 111 Legal Debt Margin Information .................................................................................................................... 112 Demographics and Economic Statistics ........................................................................................................ 113 Principal Employers ...................................................................................................................................... 114 Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function .................................................................. 115 Operating Indicators by Function ................................................................................................................. 116 Capital Asset Statistics by Function .............................................................................................................. 118

INTRODUCTORY

SECTION

This page intentionally left blank

Letter of Transmittal
i
Letter of Transmittal
January 15, 2026
To the Residents of the Town of Los Altos Hills,
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
We are pleased to submit the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for the Town of Los Altos Hills, California (Town), for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. This report was prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and contains information to help readers gain a reasonable understanding of the Town’s financial activities.

The responsibility for the accuracy of the information and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests on the Town’s management. To the best of our knowledge, we believe that the information reported is accurate in all material respects and its presentation fairly shows the financial position and the results of the Town’s operations. In providing a reasonable basis for making these representations, management has established a thorough internal control system designed to protect the government’s assets from loss, theft, or misuse and to compile necessary information for preparing the Town’s financial statements. The financial statements are to provide reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance that they are free of any material misstatements.

The ACFR is presented in three major sections that provide introductory, financial as of June 30, 2025, and statistical information about the Town. The introductory section includes this transmittal letter, the Town's organizational chart, and a list of the Town's principal officials. The financial section includes the independent auditor's report, basic financial statements, notes to basic financial statements, required supplementary information, and supplementary information on non-major funds.

Maze & Associates, a firm of licensed certified public accountants, has issued an unmodified (“clean”) opinion on the Town’s financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. The independent auditor’s report is presented as the first component of the financial section of this report.

Management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditor’s report and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. MD&A presents a comparative analysis of current and prior year results, changes in financial position, financial highlights, trends, and disclosure of any known significant events or decisions that affect the financial condition of the Town. This transmittal letter complements the MD&A and should be read in conjunction with it.

Letter of Transmittal
ii
Town Profile
The Town of Los Altos Hills is a residential community located in Santa Clara County, California. It is about 18.6 miles northwest of San Jose and 38.5 miles southeast of San Francisco. The Town was incorporated on January 27, 1956. The Town encompasses 9 square miles and has influence on an additional 5.2 square miles of unincorporated land adjacent to the Town’s boundaries. The “Sphere of Influence” maintains over 60 miles of pathways and 100 acres of open space.

The Town operates under a Council-Manager form of government. Policy-making and legislative authority are vested in the governing City Council, which consists of five Councilmembers. City Council members are elected in overlapping four-year terms and, from amongst themselves, appoint a Mayor and Vice Mayor every December. The Council is responsible for passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing Planning Commission and Volunteer Committee members, and hiring the City Manager and City Attorney. The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the City Council, overseeing the day-to-day operations of the Town, and appointing the Town staff.

The Town provides a full range of essential services through a combination of in-house staff and contract services. Services provided by the Town’s 27 full-time equivalent employees include community development (formerly planning and building inspection), engineering, maintenance of public infrastructure, recreation, limited parks and open space maintenance, and general management. Partnerships with neighboring cities, counties, and special districts are utilized to provide law enforcement services, fire services, sewer conveyance and treatment, water services, and technology support. The Town also entered public-private partnership in areas of code enforcement, trash collection, payroll services, staff augmentation, and Westwind Barn management.

The costs of providing these essential services are reviewed annually as part of the Town’s operating and capital budget process. The annual budget serves as the foundation for the Town’s financial planning, monitoring, and control. All departments of the Town are required to submit requests for appropriation to the City Manager each spring. The City Manager reviews these requests and develops a proposed budget. Prior to June 30 of each year, the City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating and capital improvement budget for review. The Council holds public hearings, and a final budget is adopted on or before June 30.

Budgetary reviews and controls are applied as described in the Notes to Required Supplementary Information. Budget to actual comparisons are provided in this report for each major governmental fund for which an annual budget has been adopted in the required supplementary information and supplementary information sections.

Throughout the year, the Administrative Services Department monitors economic changes that may affect the Town’s revenue streams, coordinates with departments in identifying changing needs and demands, and presents budget adjustments to the City Council as part of the mid-year review. Public inputs are filtered through the Town’s standing committees and to staff liaisons. These inputs are considered in the development of the budget and presented to the City Council for consideration as part of the budget review and throughout the year as separate Council action items.

Letter of Transmittal
iii
Los Altos Hills Financial Outlook
As shown in the Basic Financial Statements, the Town remains financially healthy. As of June 30, 2025, total fund balances in the governmental funds were $21.0 million. Of this amount, $4.4 million was unassigned in the General Fund and available to meet current and future operational needs. With the continued recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and the overall resiliency in the economy, the Town has been able to maintain strong assessed property values and continued robust activity related to development and building improvements. These have been the primary drivers for steady revenues over the past year.

Despite the Town’s relatively strong financial position, pension costs and liabilities continue to substantially increase based on updated actuarial studies by CalPERS. These updated actuarial studies anticipate lower long-term investment earnings, increasing employee compensation, a longer life span, and earlier retirement. The Town has addressed these changes by complying with PEPRA pension benefits for new employees, increasing employee participation in pension costs, and making voluntary payments to partially retire long-term pension liabilities. As reflected in the Town’s GASB 75 actuarial valuation, changes in actuarial assumptions required under GASB 75 resulted in an increase in the Town’s net OPEB liability during the fiscal year, despite favorable investment experience during the measurement period. The Notes to Financial Statements provide detailed information regarding the Town’s pension and OPEB obligations.

The Economy and Its Impact
Los Altos Hills has twelve non-residential properties and approximately 3,000 single-family residential properties. The twelve non-residential properties are Fremont Country Club, Purissima Hills Water District, LAHCFD vacant lot (El Monte Fire Station is part of Foothill College), Town Hall, Foothill College, four religious institutions, and three schools. With no commercial base, Los Altos Hills’ primary revenue sources are property tax, other taxes, charges for services, and development permit revenues from private development.

Based on the most recent property tax analysis performed by HdL, the local real estate market continues to be strong, with an increase in total assessed valuation despite a reduction in the volume of home sales and sale prices. In the first 6 months of 2025, there have been 47 property sales, compared to 79 in 2024 and 55 in 2023. Median sale price is down slightly, from $5.8 million in 2024 to $5.45 million in 2025. The lower transaction volume is predominantly driven by higher interest rates, and similar trends are being felt throughout the County, as total sales for 2025 are tracking below 2024 numbers and median prices are down 5.22% Countywide.

Letter of Transmittal
iv
Property tax revenues generally lag housing market activity by approximately one year, as assessed values for properties that change ownership are based on sales occurring in the prior year. In FY 2024- 25, the Town’s net taxable assessed value totaled approximately $11.05 billion, reflecting an increase of 5.2 percent over FY 2023-24. For FY 2025-26, the Santa Clara County Assessor reported a net taxable assessed value of approximately $11.69 billion, representing growth of approximately 5.8 percent over FY 2024-25. Staff continues to monitor assessed valuation trends and information from the County Controller-Treasurer’s Office to ensure the Town’s financial planning reflects the most current available data.

Long-Term Financial Planning and Financial Policies
Town management develops a five-year financial projection for all funds, covering all foreseeable elements of revenues and expenditures. This practice allows the Town to identify potential fiscal challenges early on and gives it time to plan strategically to weather economic cycles and provide stable and consistent services to its residents.

For capital projects, the Town maintains a five-year capital improvement plan that is updated annually.

This plan provides a long-term forecast of identified capital improvement projects and serves as a tool for Town management and City Council to plan, prioritize and monitor the Town’s capital projects.

The Town has established a reserve policy to set aside unrestricted general fund balance for pension, operating contingency, disaster contingency, and technology/equipment replacement reserves. The Town plans to continue to enhance financial policies including the reserve policy and to review these policies each year.
$-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Single Family Home Sales
Average Sale Price Median Sale Price

Letter of Transmittal
v
Award and Acknowledgement
The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the Town of Los Altos Hills for its Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. To be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized ACFR. This report must satisfy both GAAP and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current Annual Comprehensive Financial Report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.

Preparation of this ACFR is not possible without the hard work of the entire Finance and Administrative Services Department and the support of the other departments.

In closing, we would also like to thank the City Council and the Finance and Investment Committee for their continued interest and support in planning and conducting the financial operations of the Town in a responsible and progressive manner.

Respectfully submitted,
Cody Einfalt
Acting City Manager

Residents of Los Altos Hills
Planning Commission
City Council Volunteer Advisory
Committees (13)
City Attorney
Contract
Mayor and
City Council
City Manager
Community
Development
Director
City Clerk
Administrative
Services /
Finance Director
Assistant
Community
Development
Director
Admin. Clerk/
Technician
Building
Technician/
Inspector
Administrative
Clerk/Technician
Accounting
Technician Senior Planner
Management
Analyst
Associate
Planner
Public Safety
Contract
SCC Office of
the Sheriff
Emergency
Services
Manager
Contract
Public Works
Director
& City
Engineer
Associate
Engineer
Assistant
Engineer (2)
Maintenance
Worker I
Maintenance
Superintendent
Maintenance
Worker II
Maintenance
Worker III (2)
Utility
Engineering
Manager
Public Works
Inspector
IT Services
Contract
Senior
Accountant
(2)
Community
Services
Supervisor
Deputy City
Manager
vi

Town OƯicers
As of June 30, 2025
City Council Term Expires
Kavita Tankha, Mayor November 2026
Rajiv Bhateja, Vice Mayor November 2029
Linda Swan November 2029
Stanley Mok November 2029
George Tyson November 2026
City Council Appointed
Peter Pirnejad, City Manager
Steve Mattas, City Attorney (contract)
City Manager Appointed
Thomas Leung, Finance Director
Jay Bradford, Community Development Director
WooJae Kim, Public Works Director
Arika Birdsong-Miller, City Clerk
Cody Einfalt, Assistant to the City Manager
vii

2025 City Council
Mayor Kavita Tankha
Term of Office: November 2026
Vice Mayor Rajiv Bhateja
Term of Office: November 2029
Councilmember Linda G. Swan
Term of Office: November 2029
Councilmember Stanley Q. Mok
Term of Office: November 2029
Councilmember George K. Tyson
Term of Office: November 2026
viii

Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
Town of Los Altos Hills
California
For its Annual Comprehensive
Financial Report
For the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2024
Executive Director/CEO
ix

This page intentionally left blank

FINANCIAL

SECTION

This page intentionally left blank

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the Honorable Members of the Town Council
Town of Los Altos Hills, California
Opinions
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the businesstype activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Town of Los Altos Hills, California (Town), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the Town’s basic financial statements as listed in the Table of Contents.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Town as of June 30, 2025, and the respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof, for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinions
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the Town and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirement relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions.

Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Town’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter.

Page | 1

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements.

In performing an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and Government Auditing Standards, we:
• Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
• Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Town’s internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed.
• Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements.
• Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the Town’s ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time.

We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control-related matters that we identified during the audit.

Page | 2

Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management’s Discussion and Analysis and other Required Supplementary Information as listed in the Table of Contents be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.

Supplementary Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the Town’s basic financial statements. The accompanying Supplementary Information, as listed in the Table of Contents, is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the Supplementary Information is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.

Other Information
Management is responsible for the other information included in the annual report. The other information comprises the Introductory Section and Statistical Section listed in the Table of Contents, but does not include the basic financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinions on the basic financial statements do not cover the other information, and we do not express an opinion or any form of assurance thereon.

In connection with our audit of the basic financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other information and the basic financial statements, or the other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other information exists, we are required to describe it in our report.

Page | 3

Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated January 13, 2026, on our consideration of the Town’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the Town’s internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the Town’s internal control over financial reporting and compliance.

Pleasant Hill, California
January 13, 2026
Page | 4

Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Management’s Discussion and
Analysis
For the Year Ended June 30, 2025
As the management of the Town of Los Altos Hills, we offer readers of the Town's financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the Town of Los Altos Hills for the year ended June 30, 2025. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which can be found on pages i-v of this report.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Town-Wide Financial Highlights:
• Net Position – The Town’s total assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded its liabilities and deferred inflows of resources by $65.8 million (net position). Of this amount, $23.6 million was reported as unrestricted net position, which may be used to meet ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
• Changes in Net Position – The Town’s total net position increased by $506,529 as reflected in the government-wide Statement of Activities. Net position of governmental activities decreased by $243,790, while net position of business-type activities increased by $750,319.

Although governmental funds reported a $232,997 increase in fund balance, this was offset at the government-wide level by depreciation exceeding capital outlays and by increases in long-term liabilities, primarily pensions, compensated absences, and OPEB. These impacts were partially offset by the recognition of unavailable revenues (revenues earned but not yet collected at year-end) and internal service fund activity. The increase in business-type activities net position reflects higher sewer service charges, capital contributions from sewer connection fees, and increased investment income, partially offset by higher treatment and conveyance costs.
• Cash and investments (including restricted cash and investments) totaled $34.3 million, of which $27.1 million was classified as governmental activities and $7.2 million was related to business-type activities (Sewer). Cash and investments increased by $1.8 million, or 5.4%, compared to the prior year, consistent with revenues exceeding expenditures. • Accounts payable and other current liabilities totaled $8.1 million. Of this amount, $6.1 million related to governmental activities, while $2.0 million was attributable to businesstype activities (Sewer). There is no long-term bonded debt outstanding at the close of the fiscal year.

Page | 5