Contract Budget Summary:
Total Contract
Program
Management Airport PM
Original Contract 5/8/2020 $ 703,696 $ 592,853 $ 110,843 CA #1 6/15/2021 $ 609,550
CA #2 3/22/2022 $ 1,288,548 $ 1,098,000 $ 190,548 CA #3 2/9/2024 $ 599,738
Contract Total $ 3,201,532
Airport PM Contract $ 301,391
Program Management
Contract $ 2,900,141
Subsequent to CA #4
CA #4 (Deductive) 3/2025 $ (589,710)
Contract Total $ 2,611,822
Airport PM Contract $ 301,391
Program Management
Contract $ 2,310,431
Revision(s) Represent: Revision(s) Fee:
( ) a change in previous instructions ( ) hourly (time & materials) (x) a change in Scope of Services ( ) progress billing: $ ( ) other: Additional work and funding (x) not-to-exceed w/o authorization:
($589,710)
Revision(s) will be invoiced as:
(x) decrease to an item within the existing contract
( ) a new item added to existing contract
Issued by,
WALLACE GROUP, a
California Corporation APPROVED BY CLIENT:
Kari E. Wagner, PE C66026 ____________________________________ P
rincipal Signature
612 Clarion Court ____________________________________ San Luis Obispo Printed Name
California 93401 ____________________________________ T 805 544-4011 Title
F 805 544-4294 ____________________________________ www.wallacegroup.us Date
EXHIBIT B
22 City Project # WG Project Name Total Budget
Budget Spent
To Date
Updated Deltek
Budget
Remaining
Available Budget Close out
0001 Do Not Use $ 9,595 $ 9,595 $ - X APR1801 1801 Annual Street Resurfacing 230,558$ 230,551$ $ 230,551 $ - X EDP1809 1809 Entry Sign and Landscaping 25,000$ 22,862$ $ 32,862 $ 10,000 EDF 1810 1810 City Hall Annex Permit Cnt Recon 475$ 475$ $ 475 $ - X QLP1901 1901 Del Monte Blvd. Median 2,500$ 2,850$ $ 2,850 $ - X QLF1902 1902 Pool Rehabilitation 40,000$ 238$ $ 238 $ - X EDR1904 1904 Salinas Ave. Widening 263,706$ 52,808$ $ 52,808 $ - X QLF2002 2002 City Council Chambers ADA 6,067$ 6,067$ $ 6,067 $ - X APF2003 2003 Vince DiMaggio Bldg Rain Gutter 1,847$ 2,611$ $ 2,611 $ - X QLF2004 2004 Sports Center Rehabilitation 221,100$ 35,161$ $ 221,100 $ 185,939 HSR2005 2005 CA Ave Pedestrian Crossing 33,742$ 33,741$ $ 33,741 $ - X QLP2006 2006 Glorya Jean Tate Park Restroom &PT 98,204 $ 98,349$ $ 98,349 $ - X QLP2007 2007 Dunes Barracks Stabilization 15,625$ 15,625$ $ 15,625 $ - X EDF2008 2008 Arts Village Bldng Stabailization 110,833$ 13,779$ $ 110,883 $ 97,104 EDF2010 2010 Duplex Housing Renovation 33,250$ 1,500$ $ 1,500 $ - X HSR2011 2011 Streetlight Replacement 31,500$ 17,981$ $ 17,981 $ - X HSR2012 2012 Traffic Signal Maintenance 32,000$ 16,198$ $ 32,000 $ 15,802 QLP2016 2016 Sea Haven Community Park 41,056$ 520$ $ 41,056 $ 40,536 QLP2017 2017 Dunes Park Development 200,000$ 87,987$ $ 200,000 $ 112,013 QLP2018 2018 Equastrian Center Development 71,778$ 108,544$ $ 108,544 $ - X QLP2020 2020 Preston Park Planning 5,803$ 6,634$ $ 6,634 $ - X APF2021 2021 Fire Station 3 Reroof & Cleanup 3,981$ 3,981$ $ 3,981 $ - X HSF2101 2101 Stockade Demolition 81,317$ 81,685$ $ 81,685 $ - X HSF2102 2102 Blight Removal 460,000$ 328,537$ $ 328,537 $ - X HSR2106 2106 Traffic Signal ADA 90,000$ 15,399$ $ 15,399 $ - X 2109 Cardoza Neigborhood Storm Drain 12,000$ 1,574$ $ 1,574 $ - X 2112 Windy Hill Park Playground 110,000$ 19,771$ $ 19,771 $ - X QLP2113 2113 Preston Park Upgrade 131,000$ 60,098$ $ 131,000 $ 70,902 2115 Imjin Parkway & California Intersection 145,800$ -$ $ - $ - X 2116 Reindollar Ave/California Avenue 120,000$ 184$ $ 184 $ - X QLP2119 2119 Glorya Jean Tate Park Improvements 66,000 $ 128,717$ $ 150,000 $ 21,283 QLP2122 2122 Locke Paddon Park & Pond 35,000$ 22,832$ $ 22,832 $ - X 2126 Downtown Vitalization Implementation 180,000$ 28,410$ $ 180,000 $ 151,590 New Phase 9999 Contingency $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 589,710
2,900,141$ 1,455,263$ $ 2,900,141 $ 855,169 CA #4 TOTAL (589,710)$
1585-0001-00 Program Management Contract Details
Proposed Deductive Change Order
EXHIBIT B
23 CITY OF MARINA
AGREEMENT FOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on May _jf_ 2020, by and between the City of Marina, a California charter city, hereinafter referred to as the "City," and Wallace Group, A California Corporation, a California corporation hereinafter referred to as the "Contr actor." City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to as "party" and collectively as "parties" in this Agreement.
Recitals
A. City desires to retain Contractor for program management services for various projects in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP), hereinafter referred to as the "Project."
B. Contractor represents that it has the qualifications, experience and personnel necessary to properly perform the services as set forth herein.
C. Consultant represents that it has the degree of specialized expertise contemplated within California Government Codes §§37103 and 53060 and holds all necessary licenses to practice and perfonn the services herein contemplated.
D. City desires to retain Contractor to provide such services.
Terms apd Conditions
For of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged and in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Contractor agree to the following terms and conditions:
1. Scope of Work.
(a) Contractor is hereby hired and retained by the City to work in a cooperative manner with the City to fully and adequately perfonn those services set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto ("Scope of Work") and by this reference made a part hereof. With prior written notice to Contractor, City may elect to delete certain tasks of the Scope of Work at its sole discretion. (b) Contractor shall perform all such work with skill and diligence and pursuant to generally accepted standards of practice in effect at the time of perfonnance. Contractor shall provide corrective services without charge to the City for work which fails to meet these standards and which is reported to Contractor in writing within sixty days of discovery. Should Contractor fail or refuse to perform promptly its obligations under this Agreement, the City may render or undertake the perfonnance thereof and the Contractor shall be liable for any expenses thereby incurred. (c) If services under this Agreement are to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined in California Civil Code §2782.8(b)(2), design professional certifies that all design 1 EXHIBIT C
24 professional services shall be provided by a person or persons duly licensed by the State of California to provide the type of services described in Section l(a). By delivery of completed work, design professional certifies that the work conforms to the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and local laws, and the professional standard of care in California ( d) Contractor is responsible for making an independent evaluation and judgment of all relevant conditions affecting performance of the work.
( e) City shall cooperate with Contractor and will furnish all information data, records and reports existing and available to City to enable Contractor to carry out work outlined in Exhibit "A." Contractor shall be entitled to reasonably rely on information, data, records and reports furnished by the City, including those of the City's consultants and contractors, however, the City makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any such information, data, records or reports available to it and provided to Contractor which were furnished to the City by a third party. Contractor shall have a duty to bring to the City's attention any deficiency or error it may discover in any information provided to the Contractor by the City or a third party.
2. Iecw o{Agreeroeut& commenseroentofWork.
(a) Unless otherwise provided, the term of this Agreement shall begin on the date of its full execution and shall expire on June 30, 2023, unless extended by amendment or terminated earlier as provided herein. The date of full execution is defined as the date when all of the following events have occurred:
(i) This Agreement has been approved by the City's Council or by the board, officer or employee authorized to give such approval; and
(ii) The office of the City Attorney has indicated in writing its approval of this Agreement as to form; and
(iii) This Agreement has been signed on behalf of Contractor by the person or persons authorized to bind the Contractor hereto; and
(iv) This Agreement has been signed on behalf of the City by the person designated to so sign by the City's Council or by the officer or employee authorized to enter into this Contract and is attested to by the Marina City Clerk.
(b) Contractor shall commence work on the Project on or by ___ ___, 2020. This Agreement may be extended upon written agreement of both parties.
Contractor may be required to prepare a written schedule for the work to be performed, which schedule shall be approved by the City and made a part of Exhibit A, and to perform the work in accordance with the approved schedule.
3. cowuensatiog.
(a) City liability for compensation to Contractor under this Agreement shall only be to the extent of the present appropriation to fund this Agreement. For services to be provided under this Agreement 2 EXHIBIT C
25 City shall compensate Contractor on a time and materials basis in an amount not to exceed Seven Hundred Three Thousand Six Hundred Ninety-Six ($703,696.00). in accordance with the provisions of this Section and the Hourly Rates and Reimbursables Schedule attached hereto as Exhibit Band incorporated herein by this reference
(b) Invoice(s) in a format and on a schedule acceptable to the City shall be submitted to and be reviewed and verified by the Project Administrator (see Section S(a)) and forwarded to the City's Finance Department for payment. City shall notify Contractor of exceptions or dispute items and their dollar value within fifteen days of receipt. Payment of the undisputed amount of the invoice will typically be made approximately thirty days after the invoice is submitted to the Finance Department. ( c) Contractor will maintain clearly identifiable, complete and accurate records with respect to all costs incurred under this Agreement on an industry recognized accounting basis. Contractor shall make available to the representative of City all such books and records related to this Agreement, and the right to examine, copy and audit the same during regular business hours upon 24-hour's notice for a period of four years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. (d) Contractor shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra Work" means any work that is determined by the City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project but which is not included within the Scope of Work and which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.
Compensation for any authorized Extra Work shall be paid in accordance with the prior written authorization.
( e) Expenses not otherwise addressed in the Scope of Services or the Fee Schedule incurred by Contractor in performing services under this Agreement shall be reviewed and approved in advance by the Project Administrator (Section S(a)), be charged at cost and reimbursed to Contractor.
4. Iermipatiop 0c suspepsiop
(a) This Agreement may be terminated in whole or in part in writing by either party in the event of a substantial failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement through no fault of the terminating party, provided that no termination may be effected unless the other party is given (1) not less than ten days written notice of intent to terminate, and (2) provided an opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination. (b) If termination for default is effected by the City, an equitable adjustment in the price provided for in this Agreement shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit on unperformed services or other work, and (2) any payment due the Contractor at the time of termination may be adjusted to cover any additional costs to the City because of the Contractor's default. If after the termination for failure of Contractor to fulfill its contractual obligations, it is determined that the Contractor had not failed to fulfill contractual obligations, the termination shall be deemed to have been for the convenience of the City.
( c) The City may terminate or suspend this Agreement at any time for its convenience upon not less than thirty days prior written notice to Contractor. Not later than the effective date of such termination or suspension, Contractor shall discontinue all affected work and deliver all work product 3 EXHIBIT C
26 and other documents, whether completed or in progress, to the City. ( d) If termination for default is effected by the Contractor or if termination for convenience is effected by the City, the equitable adjustment shall include a reasonable profit for services or other work performed. The equitable adjustment for termination shall provide for payment to the Contractor for services rendered and expenses incurred prior to the termination, in addition to termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by Contractor relating to written commitments that were executed prior to the termination.
5. Proiect Administrator. Pro;ect Manager & Key Personnel, (a) City designates as its Project Administrator Public Works Director/City Engineer Mr. Brian McMinn who shall have the authority to act for the City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his/her authorized representative shall represent the City in all matters pertaining to the work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement.
(b) Contractor designates Kari Wagner, P.E., A.M., ASCE, Principal, as its Project Manager who shall coordinate all phases of the Project. The Project manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times during the Agreement term.
( c) Contractor warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement. Contractor, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City. Contractor has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the work under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Contractor may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of the City.
In the event that City and Contractor cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Ms. Kari Wagner (Project Manager)
6. Delegation of Work.
(a) If Contractor utilizes any subcontractors other than those set forth in Exhibit A section 2, consultants, persons, employees or firms having applicable expertise to assist Contractor in performing the services under this Agreement, Contractor shall obtain City's prior written approval to such employment. Contractor's contract with any subcontractor shall contain a provision making the subcontract subject to all provisions of this Agreement. Contractor will be fully responsible and liable for the pay m en t, administration, completion, presentation and quality of all work performed. City reserves its right to employ other contractors in connection with this Project. (b) If the work hereunder is performed by a design professional, design professional shall be directly involved with performing the work or shall work through his, her or its employees. The design professional's responsibilities under this Agreement shall not be delegated. The design professional shall be responsible to the City for acts, errors or omissions of his, her or its subcontractors. Negligence of subcontractors or agents retained by the design professional is conclusively deemed to be the negligence of the design professional if not adequately corrected by the design professional. Use of the term subcontractor in any other provision of this Agreement shall not be construed to imply authorization 4 EXHIBIT C
27 for a design professional to use subcontractors for performance of any professional service under this Agreement.
( c) The City is an intended beneficiary of any work performed by a subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care between the subcontractor and the City.
7. Skill of Empl oyees. Contractor shall ensure that any employees or agents providing services under this Agreement possess the requisite skill, training and experience to properly perform such services.
8. Copfideptia l apd Proprietary Ipfor matiop. In the course of performing services under this Agreement Contractor may obtain, receive, and review confidential or proprietary documents, information or materials that are and shall remain the exclusive property of the City. Should Contractor undertake the work on behalf of other agencies, entities, firms or persons relating to the matters described in the Scope of Work, it is expressly agreed by Contractor that any such confidential or proprietary information or materials shall not be provided or disclosed in any manner to any of Contractor's other clients, or to any other third party, without the City's prior express written consent.
9. Ownership of D ata. Unless otherwise provided for herein, all documents, material, data, drawings, plans, specifications, computer data files, basis for design calculations, engineering notes, and reports originated and prepared by Contractor, or any subcontractor of any tier, under this Agreement shall be and remain the property of the City for its use in any manner it deems appropriate. Contractor agrees that all copyrights which arise from creation of the work pursuant to this Agreement shall be vested in the City and waives and relinquishes all claims to copyright or intellectual property rights in favor of the City. Contractor shall provide two (2) sets of reproducible of the above-cited items, except for the computer data files which shall consist of one (I) set. Contractor shall use all reasonable efforts to ensure that any electronic files provided to the City will be compatible with the City's computer hardware and software. Contractor makes no representation as to long-term compatibility, usability or readability of the format resulting from the use of software application packages, operating systems or computer hardware differing from those in use by the City at the commencement of this Agreement.
Contractor shall be permitted to maintain copies of all such data for its files. City acknowledges that its use of the work product is limited to the purposes contemplated by the Scope of Work and, should City use these products or data in connection with additions to the work required under this Agreement or for new work without consultation with and without additional compensation to Contractor, Contractor makes no representation as to the suitability of the work product for use in or application to circumstances not contemplated by the Scope of Work and shall have no liability or responsibility whatsoever in connection with such use which shall be at the City's sole risk. Any and all liability arising out of changes made by the City to Contractor's deliverables is waived against Contractor unless City has given Contractor prior written notice of the changes and has received Contractor's written consent to such changes.
10. Copt]ict of Interest
(a) Contractor covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of its firm has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of the City or which would in any way hinder Contractor's performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall 5 EXHIBIT C
28 be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor without the express written consent of the City Manager. Contractor agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of the City in the performance of this Agreement. Contractor shall represent the interest of the City in any discussion or negotiation. (b) City understands and acknowledges that Contractor may be, as of the date of commencement of services under this Agreement, independently involved in the performance of non-related services for other governmental agencies and private parties. Contractor is unaware of any stated position of the City relative to such projects. Any future position of the City on such projects may result in a conflict of interest for purposes of this section.
( c) No official or employee of the City who is authorized in such capacity on behalf of the City to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or take part in negotiating, making accepting or approving this Agreement, during the term of his or her tenure or service with City and for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
11. Disclosure. Contractor may be subject to the appropriate disclosure requirements of the California Fair Political Practices Act, as determined by the City Manager.
12. Non-Discrimination,
(a) During the performance of this Agreement the Contractor shall comply with the applicable nondiscrimination and affirmative action provisions of the laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the City. In performing this Agreement, Contractor shall not discriminate, harass, or allow harassment, against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), medical condition (including cancer), age, marital status, denial of family and medical care leave and denial of pregnancy disability leave. Contractor shall give written notice of its obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which it has a collective bargaining or other agreement. (b) Contractor shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this Section in all subcontracts.
13. Jndempificatiop & Hold Harmless,
(a) Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which shall be solely as addressed by subsection (b) below, and to the full extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend (with independent counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) and hold harmless City, its Council, boards, commissions, employees, officials and agents ("Indemnified Parties" or in the singular "Indemnified Party") from and against any claims, losses, damages, penalties, fines and judgments, associated investigation and administrative expenses, and defense costs including but not limited to reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, expert witness fees and costs of alternate dispute resolution (collectively "Liabilities"), where same arise out of the performance of this Agreement by Contractor, its officers, employees, agents and sub-contractors. The Contractor's obligation to indemnify applies unless it is adjudicated that its liability was caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of an indemnified party. If it is finally adjudicated that liability is caused by the 6 EXHIBIT C
29 comparative active negligence or willful misconduct of an indemnified party, the Contractor's obligation shall be reduced in proportion to the established comparative liability of the indemnified party. (b) To the fullest extent permitted by law and subject to the limitations California Civil Code Sections 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Agreement are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under said section 2782.8, Contractor shall indemnify, protect, defend (with independent counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) and hold harmless City and any Indemnified Party for all Liabilities regardless of nature or type that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Contractor, or the acts or omissions of an officer, employee, agent or subcontractor of the Contractor. The Contractor's obligation to indemnify applies unless it is adjudicated that its liability was caused by the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of an indemnified party. If it is finally adjudicated that liability is caused by the comparative active negligence or willful misconduct of an indemnified party, the Contractor's obligation shall be reduced in proportion to the established comparative liability of the indemnified party. ( c) All obligations under this section are to be paid by Contractor as incurred by City, provided, however, in no event shall the cost to defend charged to a design professional exceed the design professional's proportionate percentage of fault. The provisions of this Section are not limited by the provisions of sections relating to insurance including provisions of any worker's compensation act or similar act. Contractor expressly waives its statutory immunity under such statues or laws as to City, its employees and officials. Contractor agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth here in this section from each and every subcontractor, sub tier contractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contractor in the performance or subject matter of this Agreement. In the event Contractor fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required here, Contractor agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this section.
Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. ( d) If any action or proceeding is brought against any Indemnified Party by reason of any of the matters against which the Contractor has agreed to defend the Indemnified Party, as provided above, Contractor, upon notice from the City, shall defend any Indemnified Party at Contractor's expense by counsel reasonably acceptable to the City. An Indemnified Party need not have first paid for any of the matters to which it is entitled to indemnification in order to be so defended. ( e) This obligation to indemnify and defend City, as set forth herein, is binding on the successors, assigns, or heirs of Contractor and shall survive the termination of this Agreement or this Section. (f) The act of the City in furnishing inaccurate information or City's omission by failing to furnish material information in the possession of or subject to the control of the City to Contractor which act or omission is reasonably relied upon by Contractor shall be deemed "active" for purposes of this section 13.
14. Insurance.
(a) As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement and without limiting Contractor's indemnification of the City, Contractor agrees to obtain and maintain in full force and effect at its own expense the insurance policies set forth in Exhibit "C" "Insurance" attached hereto and 7 EXHIBIT C
30 made a part hereof. Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates of insurance, manually autographed in ink by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf, along with copies of all required endorsements. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the City before any work commences. All insurance policies shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney and Risk Manager as to form and content. Specifically, such insurance shall: (1) protect City as an additional insured for commercial general and business auto liability; (2) provide City at least thirty days written notice of cancellation, material reduction in coverage or reduction in limits and ten days written notice for non-payment of premium; and (3) be primary with respect to City's insurance program. Contractor's insurance is not expected to respond to claims that may arise from the acts or omissions of the City.
(b) City reserves the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required herein by giving Contractor ninety days advance written notice of such change. If such change should result in substantial additional cost of the Contractor, City agrees to negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. ( c) All required insurance must be submitted and approved the City Attorney and Risk Manager prior to the inception of any operations by Contractor. ( d) The required coverage and limits are subject to availability on the open market at reasonable cost as determined by the City. Non availability or non-affordability must be documented by a letter from Contractor's insurance broker or agency indicating a good faith effort to place the required insurance and showing as a minimum the names of the insurance carriers and the declinations or quotations received from each. Within the foregoing constraints, Contractor's failure to procure or maintain required insurance during the entire term of this Agreement shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement under which City may immediately suspend or terminate this Agreement or, at its discretion, procure or renew such insurance to protect City's interests and pay any and all premium in connection therewith and recover all monies so paid from Contractor. ( e) By signing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 et seq., of the Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provision of that Code, and that it will comply with such provisions at all such times as they may apply during the performance of the work pursuant to this Contract. Unless otherwise agreed, a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City is required.
15. Ipdependegt Contractor The parties agree that Contractor, its officers, employees and agents, if any, shall be independent contractors with regard to the providing of services under this Agreement, and that Contractor's employees or agents shall not be considered to be employees or agents of the City for any purpose and will not be entitled to any of the benefits City provides for its employees. City shall make no deductions for payroll taxes or Social Security from amounts due Contractor for work or services provided under this Agreement.
16. Claims for Labor agd Materials. Contractor shall promptly pay when due all amounts payable for labor and materials furnished in the performance of this Agreement, so as to prevent any lien or other claim under any provision of law from arising against any City property (including reports, documents, and other tangible matter produced by the Contractor hereunder), against the Contractor's rights to payments hereunder, or against the City, and shall pay all amounts due under the Unemployment 8 EXHIBIT C
31 Insurance Act with respect to such labor.
17. Discounts Contractor agrees to offer the City any discount tenns that are offered to its best customers for the goods and services to be provided herein, and apply such discounts to payment made under this Agreement which meet the discount tenns.
18. Cooperation; Further Acts The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.
19. Dispute Besolutiog If any dispute arises between the parties as to proper interpretation or application of this Agreement, the parties shall first meet and confer in a good faith attempt to resolve the matter between themselves. If the dispute is not resolved by meeting and conferring, the matter shall be submitted for fonnal mediation to a mediator selected mutually by the parties. The expenses of such mediation shall be shared equally between the parties. If the dispute is not or cannot be resolved by mediation, the parties may mutually agree (but only as to those issues of the matter not resolved by mediation) to submit their dispute to arbitration. Before commencement of the arbitration, the parties may elect to have the arbitration proceed on an infonnal basis; however, if the parties are unable so to agree, then the arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding, unless within thirty days after issuance of the arbitrator's written decision, any party files an action in court. Venue and jurisdiction for any such action between the parties shall lie in the Superior Court for the County of Monterey.
20. compliance With Laws.
(a) Each party's perfonnance hereunder shall comply with all applicable laws of the United States of America, the State of California and the City including but not limited to laws regarding health and safety, labor and employment, wage and hours and licensing laws which affect employees. This Agreement shall be governed by, enforced and interpreted under the laws of the State of California.
Contractor shall comply with new, amended or revised laws, regulations or procedures that apply to the perfonnance of this Agreement.
(b) If the Project is a "public work," or prevailing wages are otherwise required, Contractor shall comply with all provision of California Labor Code section 1720 et seq., as applicable, and laws dealing with contractor registration, prevailing wages, apprentices and hours of work., etc. ( c) Contractor represents that it has obtained and presently holds all pennits and licenses necessary for perfonnance hereunder, including a Business License required by the City's Business License Ordinance. For the tenn covered by this Agreement, the Contractor shall maintain or obtain as necessary, such pennits and licenses and shall not allow them to lapse, be revoked or suspended.
21. Assignment or Transfer This Agreement or any interest herein may not be assigned, hypothecated or transferred, either directly or by operation of law, without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
22. Notices All notices required or pennitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing 9 EXHIBIT C
32 and shall be personally delivered, sent by facsimile ("fax") or certified mail, postage prepaid with return receipt requested, addressed as follows:
To City:
To Contractor:
City Manager
City of Marina City Hall
211 Hillcrest A venue
Marina, California 93933
Fax: (831) 384-9148
The Wallace Group, a California Corporation, Inc.
612 Clarion Court
San Luis Obispo, California 9340'
Fax: (805) 544-4294
Notice shall be deemed effective on the date personally delivered or transmitted by facsimile or, if mailed, three days after deposit in the custody of the U.S. Postal Service. A copy of any notice sent as provided herein shall also be delivered to the Project Administrator and Project Manager.
23. Amendmeng, Changes or Modifications. This Agreement is not subject to amendment, change or modification except by a writing signed by the authorized representatives of City and Contractor.
24. Force Maieure, Notwithstanding any other provisions hereof, neither Contractor nor City shall be held responsible or liable for failure to meet their respective obligations under this Agreement if such failure shall be due to causes beyond Contractor's or the City's control. It is understood and agreed to by the Contractor and the City that they cannot, and will not, claim Force Majeure based on an economic downturn of any type. Such causes include but are not limited to: strike, fire, flood, civil disorder, act of God or of the public enemy, act of the federal government, or any unit of state of local government in either sovereign or contractual capacity, epidemic, quarantine restriction, or delay in transportation to the extent that they are not caused by the party's willful or negligent acts or omissions, and to the extent that they are beyond the party's reasonable control.
25. Attorpey·s fees. In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party reasonable expenses, attorney's fees and costs.
26. Successors and Assigns. All of the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall apply to and bind the respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties.
Nothing in this paragraph is intended to affect the limitation on assignment.
27. Authority to Enter Agreement Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver and perform the Agreement. Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective party.
10 EXHIBIT C
33 28. Waiver. A waiver of a default of any term of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding default or as a waiver of the provision itself. A party's performance after the other party's default shall not be construed as a waiver of that default.
29. Seyerability Should any portion of this Agreement be determined to be void or unenforceable, such shall be severed from the whole and the Agreement will continue as modified.
30. Copstructiop, References, Captjops. Since the parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not workdays. The captions of the various sections are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.
31. Adyjce of Coupsel, The parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms and conditions of this Agreement, and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Agreement is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the parties hereto. This Agreement shall not be construed in favor or against either party by reason of the extent to which each party participated in the drafting of this Agreement.
32. Coupterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.
33. � Time is of the essence in this contract.
34. Eptire Agreemept This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the matters as set forth in this Agreement, and no other agreement, statement or promise made by or to any party or by or to any employee, officer or agent of any party, which is not contained in this Agreement shall be binding or valid.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Contractor and the City by their duly authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement, on the dates set forth below.
CITY
('""� �
By:
�-- -"7
�
Name: Layne P. Long
Its: City ryi;;na�er .
Date: n+q2V
Attest:
Per Resolution 2020 - 30
By:
��
Deputy City Clerk
CONTRACTOR
The Wallace Group, A California Corporation
By: �G= Name: Kari Wagner, PE C66026
Its: Principal
Date: May 8, 2020
By: �L-
Name: Tom Zehnder , PE C72702
Its: Principal
Date: May 8, 2020
11 EXHIBIT C
34 12
EXHIBIT C
35 EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT
(Section l.(a))
Include list of subcontractors to be utilized in Section 2 of Exhibit A. - To be provided
13 EXHIBIT C
36 EXHIBITB
HOURLY RATES and REIMBURSABLES SCHEDLE
(Section 3.(a.)
-To be provided-
14 EXHIBIT C
37 EXHIBIT c Insurance
C5ecti0u J 4.fa}
Contractor agrees to provide insurance in accordance with the requirements set forth herein. If Contractor uses existing coverage to comply with these requirements and that coverage does not meet the requirements set forth herein, Contractor agrees to amend, supplement or endorse the existing coverage to do so. Contractor shall furnish the City with original certificates of insurance, manually autographed in ink by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements must be received and approved by the City before any work commences. The City reserves its right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies at any time. The following coverage will be provided by Contractor and maintained on behalf of the City and in accordance with the requirements set forth herein.
Commercial General Liability (primary). Commercial general liability insurance covering Contractor's operations (and products where applicable) is required whenever the City is at risk of third party claims which may arise out of Contractor's work or presence on City premises. Contractual liability coverage is a required inclusion in this insurance.
Primary insurance shall be provided on ISO-CGL form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88 or on an ISO or ACORD form providing coverage at least as broad as ISO form CG 00 01 10 01 and approved in advance by the City Attorney and Risk Manager. Total limits shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for all coverages. If commercial general liability insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Project or the general aggregate limit shall be two million dollars ($2,000,000). Contractor must give written notice to the City of any pending claim, action or lawsuit which has or may diminish the aggregate.
If any such claim or lawsuit exists, Contractor shall be required, prior to commencing work under this Agreement, to restore the impaired aggregate or prove it has replacement insurance protection to the satisfaction of the City Attorney and Risk Manager.
City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be added as additional insureds using ISO additional insured endorsement form CG 20 10 11 85 or forms CG 20 10 10 01 and CG 20 37 10 01. Coverage shall apply on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance, primary or excess, available to the City or any agent of City. Coverage is not expected to respond to the claims which may arise from the acts or omissions of the City. Coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervisory role of any additional insured. Coverage shall contain no contractors' limitation endorsement. There shall be no endorsement or modification limiting the scope of coverage for liability arising from pollution, explosion, collapse, underground property damage or employment-related practices.
Umbrella Liability Insurance. Umbrella liability insurance (over primary) shall apply to bodily injury/property damage, personal injury/advertising injury, contractual liability and completed operations at a minimum, and shall be in an amount of not less than two mission dollars ($2,000,000), and include a "drop down" provision providing primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self-insured retention for liability not covered by primary policies but covered by the umbrella policy. Coverage shall be 15 EXHIBIT C
38 following form to any underlying coverage.
Coverage shall be provided on a "pay on behalf' basis, with defense costs payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross liability exclusion and no contractor's limitation endorsement. Policies limits shall be not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and in the aggregate, above any limits required in the underlying policies shall have starting and ending dates concurrent with the underlying coverage.
Business Auto. Automobile liability insurance is required where vehicles are used in performing the work under this Agreement or where vehicles are driven off-road on City premises, it is not required for simple commuting unless City is paying mileage. However, compliance with California law requiring auto liability insurance is a contractual requirement.
If automobile insurance is required for work under this Agreement, primary coverage shall be written on ISO Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto) or on an ISO or ACORD form providing coverage at least as broad as CA 00 01 10 01 approved by the City Attorney and Risk Manager. Coverage shall be endorsed to stated that the City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers shall be added as additional insureds with respect to the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor or for which the Contractor is responsible. Limits shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
Starting and ending dates shall be concurrent. If Contractor owns no autos, a non-owned auto endorsement to the commercial general liability policy described above is acceptable.
Workers' Compensation/Employers' Liability. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability insurance are not required for single-person contractors. However, under California law these coverages ( or a copy of the State's Consent to Self-Insure) must be provided if Contractor has any employees at any time during the period of this Agreement. Policy(s) shall be written on a policy form providing workers' compensation statutory benefits as required by law. Employers' liability limits shall be no less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident or disease and shall be scheduled under any umbrella policy described above. Unless otherwise agreed, policy(s) shall be endorsed to waive any right of subrogation as respects the City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.
Property Insurance. Property insurance, in a form and amount approved by the City Attorney and Risk Manager, is required for Contractors having exclusive use of premises or equipment owned or controlled by the City. City is to be named a Loss Payee As Its Interest May Appear in property insurance in which the City has an interest, e.g., as a lien holder. Fire damage legal liability is required for persons occupying a portion of City premises.
Errors and Omissions/Professional Liability. Errors and Omissions or professional liability coverage appropriate to Contractor's profession is required, in a form and amount approved by the City Attorney and Risk Manager. Such insurance shall be in an amount ofnot less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in annual aggregate. Contractor shall maintain such insurance in place for a period of five years following completion of work or services provided under this Agreement. Such continuation coverage may be provided by one of the following: (1) renewal of the existing policy; (2) an extended reporting period endorsement; or (3) replacement insurance with a retroactive date no later than commencement of the work or services under this Agreement. 16 EXHIBIT C
39 Contractor and City further agree as follows:
a) This Exhibit supersedes all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit. b) Nothing contained in this Exhibit is to be construed as affecting or altering the legal status of the parties to this Agreement. The insurance requirements set forth in this Exhibit are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and shall be interpreted as such. c) All insurance coverage and limits provided pursuant to this Agreement shall apply to the full extent of the policies involved, available or applicable. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to the City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. d) Requirements of specific coverage features or limits contained in this Exhibit are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits or other requirements, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only and is not intended by any party to be all inclusive, or to the exclusion of other coverage, or a waiver of any type.
e) For purposes of insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or toward performance of this Agreement.
f) All general or auto liability insurance coverage provided pursuant to this Agreement, or any other agreements pertaining to the performance of this Agreement, shall not prohibit Contractor, Contractor's employees, or agents from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contractor hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the City.
g) Unless otherwise approved by City, Contractor's insurance shall be written by insurers authorized and admitted to do business in the State of California with a minimum "Best's" Insurance Guide Rating of "A:VII." Self-insurance will not be considered to comply with these insurance specifications.
h) In the event any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these requirements or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Contractor. i) Contractor agrees to provide evidence of the insurance required herein, satisfactory to City Attorney and Risk Manager, consisting of certificate(s) of insurance evidencing all of the coverages required and an additional endorsement to Contractor's general liability and umbrella liability policies using ISO form CG 20 IO I I 85. Certificate(s) are to reflect that the insurer will provide at least thirty days written notice of cancellation, material reduction in coverage or reduction in limits and ten days written notice for non-payment of premium. Contractor agrees to require its insurer to modify such certificates to delete any exculpatory wording stating that failure of the insurer to mail written notice of cancellation imposes no obligation, and to delete the word "endeavor" with regard to any notice provisions. Contractor agrees to provide complete copies of policies to City within ten days of City's 17 EXHIBIT C
40 request for said copies.
j) Contractor shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage.
Such proof will be furnished at least two weeks prior to the expiration of the coverages. k) Any actual or alleged failure on the part of the City or any other additional insured under these requirements to obtain proof of insurance required under this Agreement in no way waives any right or remedy of City or any additional insured, in this or any other regard. l) Contractor agrees to require all subcontractors or other parties hired for this Project to provide workers' compensation insurance as required herein and general liability insurance naming as additional insureds all parties to this Agreement. Contractor agrees to obtain certificates evidencing such coverage and make reasonable efforts to ensure that such coverage is provided as required here. Contractor agrees to require that no contract used by any subcontractor, or contracts Contractor enters into on behalf of City, will reserve the right to charge back to City the cost of insurance required by this Agreement.
Contractor agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors or others with whom Contractor contracts with on behalf of City, will be submitted to City for review. Contractor acknowledges that such contracts or agreements may require modification if the insurance requirements do not reflect the requirements herein. Failure of City to request copies of such agreements will not impose any liability on City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. m) If Contractor is a Limited Liability Company, general liability coverage must be amended so that the Limited Liability Company and its Managers, Affiliates, employees, agents and other persons necessary or incidental to its operation are insureds.
n) Contractor agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contractor that includes City as a defendant. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve the City.
o) Coverage will not be limited to the specific location or individual entity designated as the address of the Project. Contractor agrees to have its coverage endorsed so that all coverage limits required pursuant to this requirement are available separately for each and every location at which Contractor conducts operations of any type on behalf of City. Contractor warrants that these limits will not be reduced or exhausted except for losses attributable to those specific locations and not by losses attributable to any other operations of Contractor.
p) Contractor agrees not to attempt to avoid its defense and indemnity obligations to City, its Council, boards and commissions, officers, employees, agents and volunteers by using as a defense Contractor's statutory immunity under workers' compensation or similar statutes. r) Contractor agrees to ensure that coverage provided to meet these requirements is applicable separately to each insured and that there will be no cross liability exclusions that preclude coverage for suits between Contractor and City or between City and any other insured or Named Insured under the policy, or between City and any party associated with City or its employees. 18 EXHIBIT C
41 s) Contractor shall maintain commercial general liability, and if necessary, commercial umbrella liability insurance, with a limit of not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) each occurrence for at least three years following substantial completion of the work.
u) City reserves the right to modify the insurance requirements set forth herein in accordance with the terms of any specific Service Order issued as provided by the Agreement. 19 EXHIBIT C
42 March 31, 2020
Brian McMinn
Public Works Department
City of Marina
211 Hillcrest Avenue
Marina, California 93933
Subject: City of Marina Program Management Services
Dear Mr. McMinn:
Wallace Group appreciates the selection of our company to provide the City of Marina Program Management, Design, Construction Management and Inspection Services for the FY '19 - '20 and FY '20 - '21 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP).
Based on March 14, 2020 meeting discussion, cost proposal for Design, Construction Management and Inspection will be submitted on a project by project basis, therefore are not included in this scope of work. Attached are Wallace Group's cost proposals (Exhibits 1 and 2) for the Program Management Services for your consideration.
The following provides an overview of our program management approach to implement the delivery of CIP and ACIP projects listed in Exhibits 1 and 2.
SCOPE OF SERVICES FOR PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Wallace Group is able to provide the following program management services based on the various phases of a project, and on the specific needs of each project. Note, each project will be unique and may or may not require all items identified and additional tasks may be identified based on other project specifics. Wallace Group will work with the City to confirm the specific tasks for each project that are desired by the City prior to proceeding.
Wallace Group will open up a new phase for each project, and task for each of the five phases identified below to track budgets separately. Budgets will be based on a percentage of the construction contract to start, but may be required to be adjusted based on the complexity of the project as the project moves through the various phases. Wallace Group will alert the City on specific projects when the program management budget reaches 75% of the estimated task value.
Phase 1 - Program Managemen t Set up and Pre-Bid phase:
1.1 1.2
1.3 1.4
1.5 1.6
Project document management set up.
Project review and evaluation, scope refinement, project prioritization and cost Control.
City kick-off and update meetings with the City.
RFQ / RFP writing. Projects identified by the City to be designed by current City on-call consultants, request for cost proposal will be issued.
Review design consultant and/or professional services cost proposals.
Prepare notice to proceed and coordinate with the City for administration and project accounting.
WAUACE GROUP�
CIVIL AND
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECTURE
MECHANICAL
ENGINEERING
PLANNING
PUBLIC WORKS
ADMINISTRATION
SURVEYING/
GIS SOLUTIONS
WATER RESOURCES
WALLACE GROUP
A California Corpor.ulon
612 CLARION CT
SAN LUIS OBISPO
CALIFORNIA 93401
T 805 544-4011
F 805 S44-4294
www.wallacegroup.us
EXHIBIT C
43 PP20·6871
City of Marina
March 31, 2020
Phase 2 • Project Design Phase
2.1 Coordinate meeting with design consultants and /or professional services contractors.
2.2 Coordination and meetings with City and stakeholders.
2.3 Environmental review acquisition.
2.4 Permit preparation and acquisition.
2.5 Review design submittals at 30%, 60% and 90%.
2.6 Review 100% bidding documents and acquire City signatures and approval for Bidding.
2.7 Review and process consultant progress payments.
Phase 3 • Bidding Phase
3.1 Prepare bidder's list.
3.2 Upload bidding documents to the ebidboard and send bidding documents to Builders Exchange.
3.3 Conduct pre-bid meetings.
3.4 Coordinate with design consultant for RFI response.
3.5 Prepare and distribute Addendum.
3.6 Follow up phone calls to bidders.
3.7 Review and evaluate bids and notify the City.
3.8 Assist the City in evaluating bid protest.
3.9 Write staff report for award of construction contract.
3.10 Prepare notice to proceed/award and coordinate with the City for administration and project accounting.
Phase 4 • Construction Phase
4.1 Acquire cost proposal for Construction Management and Inspections (CM&I).
4.2 Review and evaluate CM&I proposal.
4.3 Prepare notice to proceed/award and coordinate with the City for administration and project accounting.
4.4 Attend pre-construction meeting.
4.5 Process contractor progress payments in coordination with CM.
4.6 Evaluate change orders In coordination with CM and make recommendations to the City.
4.7 Attend final inspection.
4.8 Coordinate ribbon cutting ceremony, if needed.
Phase 5- Close-out Phase
5.1 Prepare project record close out.
5.2 Prepare and file Notice of Completion.
Project tracking will be updated weekly and update meetings with the City is every two weeks or as required. Project tracking updates will include relevant project status, cost estimates update, schedule, permitting updates and construction updates. Assist City staff and attend City Council and Commission meetings as needed. WG will assist in providing documents for City website updates by the others.
WALLA.CE GROUPo
EXHIBIT C
44 PP20-6871
City of Marina
March 31, 2020
Deliverables: Project by project basis, example of deliveries are follows. • Preparation of agenda minutes from meetings
• Staff Reports
• Notice to Proceed or Notice of Award
• Final plans and specifications and record drawings, completed by others. • Notice of completion
SCHEDULE
• Project tracking spreadsheet will include a target completion dates for design and construction.
• Detailed schedule for design for each project will be submitted. • Construction timeline for each project will be submitted.
TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CLIENT
• Record Drawings.
• Library of City documents, design standards, specifications and other project related documents.
ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN SCOPE OF SERVICES
The following services are not included in this proposal:
• Project Design (to be provided under separate contract, or by others) • Environmental study and review
• Construction Management and Inspection (to be provided under separate contract, or by others)
PROJECT FEES:
Wallace Group will perform the Program Management services for the City of Marina FY '19 - '20 and FY '20 - '21 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and Airport Capital Improvement Program (ACIP) of the proposed Scope of Services in accordance with the attached Standard Billing Rates (Exhibit A). These services will be invoiced monthly on an accrued cost basis, and our total fees, including reimbursables will not exceed our estimated fee of $592,853 and $110,843 for the City of Marina CIP and ACIP, respectively, without receiving written authorization from the Client.
At your request, additional services to the Scope of Services will be performed by Wallace Group following the signature of our Contract Amendment or the initiation of a new contract.
WALLACE GROUP@
EXHIBIT C
45 PP20·6871
City of Marina
March 31, 2020
TERMS AND CONDmONS
In order to convey a clear understanding of the matters related to our mutual responsibilities regarding this proposal, we will perform the work in accordance with mutually agreed terms based on the December 2019 provided sample contract. If this proposal meets with your approval, please let us know, and we will facilitate conforming the provided sample contract to the project. Please sign where indicated and return to our office, which will serve as our notice-to-proceed.
We want to thank you for this opportunity to present our proposal for professional services. If you would like to discuss this proposal in greater detail, please feel free to contact me or Elvie Camacho.
Sincerely,
WALLACE GROUP, a California Corporation TERMS AND CONDITIONS ACCEPTED:
Kari E. Wagner, PE C66026
Principal
612 Clarion Court
San Luis Obispo
California 93401
T 805 544-4011
F 805 544-4294
www.wallacegroup.us
Attachments
kc: PP20-6871, 2019, std
Exhibits 1 & 2
Exh1b1t A
Signature
Printed Name
Title
Date
THIS PROPOSAL IS VALID FOR 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS DOCUMENT.
WAllACE GROUPe
EXHIBIT C
46 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
Exhibit A
CIP and ACIP projects to be Consultant Managed
CIP
Annual Street Resurfacing APR1801
Community Center Playground Seating and Amenities HSP1803 Vince DiMaggio Building Rain Gutter Replacement APF 2003 California Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Installation HSR 2005 Glorya Jean Tate Park Pump Track and Restroom Improvements OLP 2006 Dunes Banacks Stabilization OLP 2007
Arts Village Building Stabilization EDF 2008
Duplex Housing Renovation EDF 2010
Streetlight Replacement HSR 2011
Equestrian Center Development OLP 2018
Fire Station 3 Reroof and Cleanup APF 2021
Salinas Avenue Widening EDR 1904
Traffic Signal Maintenance HSR 2012
Sea Haven Communit Park OLP 2016
Preston Park Planning OLP 2020
Stockade Demolition TBD
CIP Totals
Wallace Group, Inc. Program Management Total
ACIP
Airport Building 504 Improvements 461
Airport Fuel Farm � Fuel Tank Replacement �80 I HSA 18D, Airport Pavement Maintenance 2003
Airport Building 533 Improvements 2004
Airport Building 524 Improvements 2006
Backup Power to Airport Fuel Farm 2008
Airport Building 510 New Roof 2102
Airport Gateway Sign 2103
Airport Storm Drain Mitigation 403
ACIP Totals
Wallace Group, Inc. Program Management Total
$6,320,000
$15,000
$25,000
$75,000
$350,000
$330,000
$1,500,000
$450,000
$125,000
$850,000
$350,000
$490,000
$200,000
$50,000
$50,000
$2,050,000
$13,230,000
$592,853
$345,000
$300,000
$274,000
$175,000
$140,000
$36,000
$105,000
$35,000
$74,701
$1,484,701
$110,843
EXHIBIT C
47 Exhibit B - Rate Schedule
Exhibit A
Standard Billing Rates
Engineering, Design & Support Services:
Assistant Designer/Technician ......................................... $ 90 Designer/Technician I - IV .............................................. $ 95 - $125 Senior Designer I - Ill ........... ........................ ................. $138 - $148 GIS Technical Specialist .......... ........................ ............... $135 Senior GIS Technical Specialist ........................................ $145 Associate Engineer 1-111 ............................................... $ 115 - $135 Engineer I - IV ............ .................. ............... ................ $145 - $160 Senior Engineer I • Ill ............... ..................................... $170 - $180 Director ............................................ ........................ $185 Principal Engineer/Consulting Engineer .............................. $215 Principal ...................................................... ............. $230 Surveying Services:
Associate Survey Technician ................... ......... ............... $ 95 WALi.ACE GROUF.
Prevailing Wage*
One-Person Survey Crew .................... ............ ................ $160 ................ ................ $195 Two-Person Survey Crew .......... ...................................... $215 ................................ $290 Three-Person Survey Crew ......................................... ..... $275 ................................ $370 Survey Technician I - IV ....................................... .......... $115 - $139 Land Surveyor I - Ill ................... ................................... $145 - $155 Senior Land Surveyor I - 111. ............................................. $160 - $110 · Director .................................... ............... ................. $185 Planning Services:
Associate Planner I - 11 ............... .................................... $ 95 • $105 Planner I - IV ..................... ......................................... $128 - $152 Senior Planner I - 111 .................. ...................... .............. $155 - $165 Director ....................................... ................ ............. $175 Landscape Architecture Services:
Associate Landscape Designer I - II .................................... $ 90 • $100 Designer I - IV ....... ...................................................... $110 • $128 Landscape Architect I - IV .............................................. $130 • $145 Senior Landscape Architect I - Ill ....................... ............... $147 • $161 Director ........................................... .......... ............... $165 Construction Management / Field Inspection Services:
Construction Office Tech 1-111 .................. ................ ...... $ 95 - $115 Construction Inspector I - 11 ............................................. $120 - $135 .............. $155 • 160 Senior Construction Inspector .......................................... $145 ..................... $165 Assistant Resident Engineer I - 11 ....................................... $140 • $145 Resident Engineer I - Ill .......... ....................................... $150 • $160 Senior Resident Engineer ............................................... $170 Director .......... ................... ....................................... $180
EXHIBIT C
48 Public Works Administration Services:
Project Analyst I· IV ..................................................... $110 • $140 Senior Project Analyst I • Ill ............................................ $145 • $155 Senior Environmental Compliance Specialist I· 111 .................. $160 • $170 Support Services:
Office Assistant ........................................................... $ 85 Project Assistant I - 111 ................................................... $ 90 • $100 Additional Professional Services:
Fees for expert witness preparation, testimony, court appearances, or depositions will be billed at the rate of $300 an hour. As authorized in advance by the Client, overtime on a project will be billed at 1.5 times the employee's typical hourly rate.
Direct Expenses:
Direct expenses will be invoiced to the client and a handling charge of 15% may be added. Sample direct expenses include, but are not limited to the following:
• travel expenses • sub-consultant services • agency fees • delivery/copy services • m;teage (per IRS rates) • other direct expenses Invoicing and Interest Charges:
Invoices are submitted monthly on an accrued cost basis in accordance with this Fee Schedule. A finance charge of 1.5% per month may be assessed on all balances that are thirty days past due.
Right to Revisions:
Wallace Group reserv es the right to revise this Schedule of Fees on an annual basis, personnel classifications may be added as necessary.
*Prevafling Wage:
State established prevailing wage rates may apply to some services and those rates are subject to change.
WALLACE GROUP
2019 Standard Bllllng Rates Amended 2019-07-31
2 EXHIBIT C
49 EXHIBIT C
50 EXHIBIT C
51 EXHIBIT C
52 EXHIBIT C
53 EXHIBIT C
54 EXHIBIT C
55 EXHIBIT C
56 EXHIBIT C
57 EXHIBIT C
58 EXHIBIT C
59 EXHIBIT C
60 EXHIBIT C
61 EXHIBIT C
62 EXHIBIT C
63 EXHIBIT C
64 EXHIBIT C
65 EXHIBIT C
66 EXHIBIT C
67 EXHIBIT C
68 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment to the Agreement for CONTRACTOT to provide engineering and building permit services pertaining to City projects and development and to provide support services for the CITY on an as-needed basis as determined by the City Engineer on the date(s) and year written below.
CITY OF MARINA
By:
Date: � / i_ / 2024
"/
:
y
all
� ;:
�oration
Nam� ���gnet�C66026
Its: Principal
Date: February 8, 2024
(Attestation & Approval follow)
Counci I Authorization (date): (-e.-bf'-'A .... 'i. "1, :lo� 1../ Deputy
Resolution No . .:2.,051-L..1 -10
ATTEST:
By /Li
Oty
�
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: -----------
City Attorney
EXHIBIT C
69 EXHIBIT C
70 EXHIBIT C
71 EXHIBIT C
72 EXHIBIT C
73 EXHIBIT C
74 EXHIBIT C
75 EXHIBIT C
76 EXHIBIT C
77 EXHIBIT C
78 EXHIBIT C
79 EXHIBIT C
80 M
ST HIGHLIGHTS
Board of Directors Meeting
April 14, 2025
RECOGNIZED APRIL EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH
The MST Board adopted Resolution 2025-19 recognizing Kaleb Aquino, Mobility Specialist, as the April 2025 Employee of the Month for his outstanding contribution to MST and the entire community.
25 YEARS OF SERVICE
The MST Board recognized Coach Operator Ernie Sanchez for 25 years of service and his outstanding dedication and contribution to MST and to the entire community.
MST BOARD SERVICE RECOGNITION AND APPRECIATION
The MST Board adopted Resolution 2025-20 in recognition and appreciation of Sid Williams on the Measure Q Oversight Committee and for his dedication to Monterey- Salinas Transit and its vision of connecting communities, creating opportunity, and being kind to our planet.
FORT ORD TRAIL GREENWAY PROJECT
The MST Board authorized the General Manager/CEO or their designee to execute an agreement granting the Transportation Agency for Monterey County an access easement, slope easement, and temporary construction easement on MST real property located on Imjin Road in Marina to construct the California Avenue segment of the Fort Ord Regional Trail and Greenway Project.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM RESOLUTION 2025-21 The MST Board adopted Resolution 2025-21, authorizing the certification and assurances, authorized agent forms, and execution of the Low Carbon Transit Operations Program projects for FY 2024/25.
RECEIVED MEASURE Q OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE LETTER
The MST Board received a letter from the Measure Q Oversight Committee reporting that FY 2023 funds were spent on eligible expenses.
AUTHORIZED PURCHASE OF FOUR FORD TRUCKS
The MST Board authorized the General Manager/CEO to purchase four (4) Ford trucks at the lowest price/best options at the time of purchase utilizing the CA Department of General Services (DGS) Contract #1-22-23-20F in an amount not to exceed $380,940.
Agenda Item: 10j(1)
May 6, 2025
10 YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF MEASURE Q AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS
The MST Board received a presentation on the 10-year anniversary of Measure Q accomplishments.
GREENFIELD LINE 33 BUS STOP AND CIRCULATOR SERVICE
IMPLEMENTATION
The MST Board provided staff direction to continue with implementation of Line 33 and continue On Call service to the end of the service contract with MV Transportation, Inc. on June 30, 2025; and, further directed staff to continue to work with Greenfield to educate and communicate with residents about the new circulator service and MST RIDES; and, further directed staff to continue to look for opportunities to provide other mobility options.
SURF! BUSWAY AND BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT
The MST Board authorized the General Manager/CEO or their designee to execute a construction contract with Graniterock-Myers JV (GRM) for the SURF! Busway and Bus Rapid Transit Project in a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) amount of not more than $59,200,000; authorized the General Manager/CEO or their designee to execute contract change orders up to $250,000 each for this Project but not to exceed the maximum budget; and, allocated $11,100,000 in project contingency funding as required by the Federal Transit Administration to pay for unanticipated costs during construction.
EAST ALISAL BUS RAPID TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY AND SALINAS TRANSIT
CENTER RELOCATION STUDY
The MST Board authorized the General Manager/CEO or their designee to enter into a contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to conduct an East Alisal Bus Rapid Transit Feasibility Study and Salinas Transit Center Relocation Study in an amount not to exceed $547,420 for the required scope of work, and a total of $79,119 in optional tasks, of which not all may be conducted, with a total contract value not to exceed $626,539.
NEXT MST BOARD MEETING
The next regular MST Board meeting is scheduled for May 12, 2025.
HIGHLIGHTS OF
REGULAR BOARD MEETING
April 17, 2025
1. MaryAnn Carbone, Board Chair, called the meeting to order at 11:10 a.m. at City Hall in Sand City.
2. The Board approved adding an emergency item for just cause to allow Board Member Alex Miller to attend the meeting via phone.
3. The Board Approved routine consent items, including minutes of the March 20, 2025 Board meeting and disbursements for the period of March 1-31, 2025 in the amount of $1,250,364.07.
4. From the CEO report:
• Total donations for March 2025 were $13,276.
• Significant donations were as follows:
▪ $5,000 Montage Health (event sponsorship)
▪ $1,000 Monterey Peninsula Volunteer Services (event sponsorship) ▪ $2,000 Pinnacle Bank (event sponsorship)
▪ 27 monetary donations (including 9 recurring “Friends and Neighbors” donations) • Grant applications were submitted to:
▪ Dogs of Carmel Charity Benefactor, proceeds to support Shuman HeartHouse ▪ City of Carmel-by-the-Sea Discretionary Grant, $3,000 for Shuman HeartHouse ▪ HHAP Round 5, $450,000 for Shelter Operations at Shuman HeartHouse ▪ HHAP Round 5, $300,000 for Shelter Operations at Safe Place Youth Shelter ▪ HHAP Round 5, $449,992 for Shelter Operations at Casa de Noche Buena ▪ Kaiser Permanente, $25,000 for Housing Stability Service at Casa de Noche Buena. • Grant Received:
▪ Salinas Valley Health Foundation, $5,000 for General Support of Mental Health and Substance Use Services
▪ Montage Health, $5,000 for event sponsorship of Solving Homelessness • Negotiations for our two largest contracts, Behavioral Health drug and alcohol and mental health services, are under way and going smoothly. The County has expressed the desire to achieve are mutually beneficial agreement with amounts and rates that more than cover our costs, leaving small net profits if we reach our target goals. The discussions have been polite and transparent, and we are hopeful for positive outcomes. • The Agency reserved a table for the Monterey Peninsula Chamber of Commerce Annual Awards Dinner to honor our board chair Mary Ann Carbone who was awarded Elected Official of the Year. The Mayor’s reception was marked by the loudest cheers and most applause of the evening, which was most fitting given her long career in local politics and her amazing record of achievements. Congratulations, Mary Ann. • Human Resources Director A. Miller’s last day of employment with CHS was this month.
We are recruiting; in the meantime, R. Angulo is once again performing our HR functions in addition to her Executive Assistant functions.
• The preliminary Agency budget was prepared this month by CFO T. Allen, with input from the COO S. Stone, Senior Program Officer M. Sullivan and the CEO. A budget study session was held at 10 a.m. on 4/17. The budget will be adopted on 5/15 at the regular board meeting. • Off Main Clinic is creating an admissions office next door in the Outpatient Treatment suite to accommodate new patients more comfortably during the often-difficult admissions process Agenda Item: 10j(2)
May 6, 2025
and planned growth of the patient census. That space is currently not utilized in the morning when admissions occur. Outpatient groups will still be offered in the afternoon. • We received the Adolescent Outpatient Treatment license for our Monterey Outpatient Treatment Center this month. CHOMP Recovery Center already has a few patients to refer to us. We plan to open our doors to youth starting Monday, May 5. • The CEO, Communications Manager G. James, Sr. Program Officer M. Sullivan and the CEO are developing an advertising and outreach plan and collateral materials to market our SUD services with a focus on the new adolescent program and medication-assisted treatment services. The goal is to reach more people and increase the level of services provided. • The CFO T. Louis and the CEO attended the Monterey Museum of Art’s Patron dinner as guests of our IT services provider Rayne Tech. It was a great opportunity to strengthen that relationship and meet a few prospective new supporters of CHS. • After a thorough RFP process, CFO T. Louis, Finance Chair A. Yee Steck and the CEO met with the Audit Committee to interview 3 auditing firms for a new 3-year engagement.
5. From the COO report:
• The Senior Program Officer position for Mental Health Services remains vacant due to challenges in finding qualified candidates. Despite this, all programs are running smoothly, with particularly high productivity in FSC’s largest program, the Outpatient Mental Health Program. Additionally, kudos to the OPMH team at FSC Salinas for successfully completing the Monterey County Behavioral Health site visit and having their corrective action plan approved.
• We currently have several key construction projects underway: Genesis House Bathroom Improvement Project – Genesis House continues to operate at full capacity during construction. The project is approximately 90% complete. Safe Passage Facility Improvements Project – Safe Passage is also fully operational during construction. This project is approximately 40% complete. FSC Seaside Mainline Plumbing Project – We have finalized the contract with JD Underground and are currently in the permitting and planning stages. We are aiming for project completion by the end of April. • The SHARE Center is performing well and is fully staffed, with a current census of 85, putting capacity at 91%. This is a significant success. To track this more efficiently, the COO developed a bed-count tracking log that calculates current capacity by dividing the number of available beds (minus unavailable family beds) by the census. This provides an up-to-date snapshot of our capacity in real time. The log has been invaluable, as it allows us to clearly communicate our capacity to stakeholders—without needing to explain the nuances of vacant versus unavailable beds. Given its user-friendly design, we’ve also rolled out this log at both Casa de Noche Buena and Shuman HeartHouse.
• Last month, Evangelina Ochoa, Senior Program Officer of Homeless Services, and the COO developed a new Progress Report to assess engagement and progress at the SHARE Center.
The report has been successfully rolled out. Given the unique nature of a low-barrier navigation center and shelter at the SHARE Center, parameters like length of stay and progress can be subjective. This new report streamlines the process, enhances objectivity, and helps staff stay aligned with the targeted goals of supporting guests in securing housing and achieving greater self-sufficiency. To further boost engagement and positive outcomes, we have also introduced this report at Casa de Noche Buena and Shuman HeartHouse. This will be a significant benefit across all our short-term shelters, as it provides a standardized guideline for 30-day progress checks, eliminating the need for separate procedures for progress reports.
• Lastly, the COO has had multiple meetings with Meals on Wheels, and is in the process of developing an agreement for them to provide food services to programs like Genesis House, Casa de Noche Buena, and Shuman HeartHouse when kitchen operations are interrupted.
Currently, when there is a planned or unplanned staff absence or kitchen closure, food services are handled on a case-by-case basis, often involving ordering outside food or using non-kitchen staff as needed. Having a contract with Meals on Wheels will not only be more cost-effective but will also ensure more nutritious and delicious meals when needed.
6. The Finance Committee meeting was held prior to the board meeting. The financial dashboard showed that cash went up and correspondingly accounts receivable went down. The Balance Sheet did not show anything unusual. The committee also reviewed action items for Selection of Auditor and Acceptance of 990 Tax Return and CA Tax Return that were on the agenda for approval.
7. The Board approved auditor Chavan and Associates, LLP, as recommended by the Audit Committee.
8. The Board accepted the 990 Tax Return, as presented by the Audit Committee.
9. The Board Member Alex Miller thanked the Board for allowing him to join the meeting.
10. Board Chair MaryAnn Carbone appointed board members Lori McDonnell & Anita Crawley to an Ad-Hoc Nominating Committee to bring a slate of officers for FY 2025-26 to the May board meeting for approval.
11. Board Chair MaryAnn Carbone also reminded the board that the CHS Board Meeting & Retreat will be held on Thursday, May 15th from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. at Shoreline Church.
12. Board Chair MaryAnn Carbone adjourned the meeting at 12:14p.m.
The next regular board meeting & board retreat is scheduled for Thursday, May 15th from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. at the Shoreline Church, Monterey CA.
May 15, 2025 Item No. 11a
Mayor and Members of the
City Council
City Council Meeting
of May 6, 2025
CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER OPENING A PUBLIC HEARING,
TAKING PUBLIC TESTIMONY, AND INTRODUCING ORDINANCE
2025-, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE MARINA
MUNICIPAL CODE , BY ADDING CHAPTER 15.07, “ FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES,” TO THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE ; THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061(b)(3) OF THE CEQA
GUIDELINES
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending that the City Council:
1. Open a public hearing, take public testimony and consider introducing Ordinance No. 2025-, (EXHIBIT A), amending Title 15 of the Marina Municipal Code by adding Chapter 15.07, the State Fire Hazard Severity Zone map (EXHIBIT B)
BACKGROUND
Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps arose from major destructive fires, prompting the recognition of these areas and strategies to reduce wildfire risks. Legislative response led to mandated mapping across California under the California Public Resources Code sections 4201-4204, encompassing all State Responsibility Areas (SRA). The State Fire Marshal is mandated to classify lands within State Responsibility Areas into Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ). Fire Hazard Severity Zones fall into one of the following classifications: “Moderate” “High” and “Very High”. California laws that require Fire Hazard Severity Zones are in the California Public Resources Code Sections 4201-4204, California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 1280 and California Government Code Sections 51175-89.
Recent mandates from the State required the State Fire Marshal to identify fire hazard severity zones that fall within the Local Responsibility Area (LRA). The City of Marina is an example of an LRA that the State Fire Marshal has identified Fire Hazard Severity Zones. See excerpts from the applicable Government Code:
Government Code 51178 states in part:
…“The State Fire Marshal shall identify areas in the state as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on consistent statewide criteria and based on the severity of fire hazard that is expected to prevail in those areas. Moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones shall be based on fuel loading, slope, fire weather, and other relevant factors including areas where winds have been identified by the Office of the State Fire Marshal as a major cause of wildfire spread….”
1 Government Code 51178.5 states in part:
…“Within 30 days after receiving a transmittal from the State Fire Marshal that identifies fire hazard severity zones pursuant to Section 51178, a local agency shall make the information available for public review and comment. The information shall be presented in a format that is understandable and accessible to the general public, including, but not limited to, maps…”
Government Code 51179 states in part:
(a) A local agency shall designate, by ordinance, moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones in its jurisdiction within 120 days of receiving recommendations from the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Section 51178.
(b) (1) A local agency may, at its discretion, include areas within the jurisdiction of the local agency, not identified as very high fire hazard severity zones by the State Fire Marshal, as very high fire hazard severity zones following a finding supported by substantial evidence in the record that the requirements of Section 51182 are necessary for effective fire protection within the area. (2) A local agency may, at its discretion, include areas within the jurisdiction of the local agency, not identified as moderate and high fire hazard severity zones by the State Fire Marshal, as moderate and high fire hazard severity zones, respectively. (3) A local agency shall not decrease the level of fire hazard severity zone as identified by the State Fire Marshal for any area within the jurisdiction of the local agency, and, in exercising its discretion pursuant to paragraph (2), may only increase the level of fire hazard severity zone as identified by the State Fire Marshal for any area within the jurisdiction of the local agency… Discussion:
The City of Marina received the FHSZ map on March 10, 2025. At the April 6, 2025 City Council meeting, the FHSZ maps were presented to the Council and to the public. The maps were also made available in print and are available on the City’s Web site.
The City is mandated to adopt, by ordinance, the FHSZ zones within the City boundaries and the ordinance must be adopted within 120 days. Within 30 days of ordinance adoption, a copy of the adopted ordinance must be sent to the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection.
The Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps were developed from a geospatial model designed to describe relative wildland and urban-interface fire hazard potential over the long-term for all areas of the state. Different steps are taken for modeling FHSZ in wildland areas, defined as those where a fuel model can be applied, and non-wildland areas. Non-wildland areas include urban, agricultural and barren lands, and water or wetlands. Wildland areas are scored directly based on data inputs within the wildland, and non-wildland areas are scored using a buffering routine that builds zones based on proximity to wildland as well as factors that reflect how conducive the non- wildland area is to fire spread. In addition, slightly different rules apply for zoning in State Responsibility Area (SRA) vs Local Responsibility Area (LRA) and Federal Responsibility Area (FRA).
2 To evaluate the fire hazard in a LRA area, CAL FIRE uses an extension of the State Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zone model as the basis for evaluating the fire hazard within an LRA.
The LRA hazard rating reflects flame and ember intrusion from adjacent wildlands and from flammable vegetation in the urban area.
Per the FHSZ Map from the State of California, the City of Marina has Moderate and High Fire Hazard Zones. The City of Marina does not have any Very High Hazard Zones. The hazard maps are available to view on the Cities website. Residents can look up their property and determine what zone, if any, they are in by going to the Cities GIS viewer and looking up their parcel.
CONCLUSION
Government Code section 51179 requires a local agency to designate, by ordinance, moderate, high, and very high FHSZ within 120 days of receiving the identified FHSZ map from the State Fire Marshal. We received the FHSZ map on March 10, 2025.
The law does not allow for a local jurisdiction to request changes or provide comments to the State Fire Marshal on the FHSZ designations, and a local agency is not allowed to reduce the designation of a FHSZ classification from the State Fire Marshal FHSZ map.
The proposed Ordinance brings the City’s municipal code into compliance with state laws. This request is submitted for City Council consideration and action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Staff has determined that the exemption applies in this case because the proposed procedural changes would not result in a direct or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and the proposed ordinance is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have potential for causing significant effect on the environment. Therefore, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Doug McCoun
Fire Chief
City of Maria
REVIEWED/CONCUR:
________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
3 ORDINANCE 2025-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARINA AMENDING TITLE 15 ENTITLED “BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION”, BY ADDING CHAPTER 15.07, “FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES” , TO THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
1. Title 15 amended. Title 15, entitled “Buildings and Construction” is hereby amended by adding a new section, Chapter 15.07 “Fire Hazard Severity Zones”, to the Municipal Code to read as set forth on the attached Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference thereto.
2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its final passage.
3. Posting of Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the passage of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted in the three (3) public places designated by resolution of the City Council.
The foregoing ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on May 6, 2025, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting duly held on May 20, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
4 EXHIBIT A
CHAPTER 15.07
Section-15.07.00-Adoption of Fire Hazard Safety Zone Map A. The City of Marina hereby designates the Fire Hazard Severity Zones as recommended by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection pursuant to Government Code Section 51178.
B. The City hereby adopts by reference the Fire Hazard Safety Zone Map from the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection into the Marina Municipal Code for the parcels that are within the City of Marina boundaries as defined by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).
The map, approved by the city, is hereby incorporated by reference, and entitled “City of Marina Fire Hazard Severity Zones,” dated March 10, 2023.
The official map is also located electronically on the following website:
https://cityofmarina.org/107/Community-Development
5 EXHIBIT B
6 May 15, 2025 Item No. 11b
Mayor and Members of the City Council Meeting
City Council of May 6, 2025
CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER OPENING A PUBLIC HEARING,
TAKING PUBLIC TESTIMONY, AND INTRODUCING ORDINANCE
2025-, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARINA AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15 . 32, ENTITLED “ADOPTION OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC)” SECTION 15.32.890, SUBSECTION 5609.1.4-r OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE ; THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE IS
EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO
SECTION 15061(b)(3) OF THE CEQA GUIDELINES
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending that the City Council:
1. Open a public hearing, take public testimony and consider introducing Ordinance No. 2025-, amending Title 15, Chapter 15. 32 entitled “Adoption of the California Fire Code (CFC), Section 15.32.890, Subsection 5609.1.4 -r of the marina municipal code . (EXHIBIT A)
BACKGROUND
Currently Chapter 15.32, Section 15.32.890 Subsection 5609.1.4. r) of the Marina Municipal Code currently reads; “ No fireworks shall be sold or discharged on the Marina Municipal Airport property.”
Discussion:
The City of Marina has been searching for a location to sponsor a City Wide Fourth of July Celebration, a place where families can come together to enjoy live bands, food and to use their Safe and Sane fireworks. Staff has identified a site at the airport that gives the City ample space to facilitate live bands, food trucks and a space for families to use their safe and sane fireworks.
“Safe and Sane” means that the fireworks are less likely to cause injury and generally means that the fireworks do not explode or fly. Fireworks that include rockets, aerial missiles and spinners, roman candle -types and any other devices (combination or novelty) that are structurally or functionally like any of these designs are not considered " Safe and Sane" and are not allowed to be used anywhere within the City of Marina.
Our current ordinance does not allow Safe and Sane fireworks to be used at the airport. For the City to facilitate this event, the current ordinance needs to be amended. The proposed amendment will allow the City to facilitate the proposed event.
The Airport Manager has been involved in the planning and supports the Fourth of July celebration at the Airport with the use of Safe and Sane fireworks. There will not be any aerial fireworks which can be a hazard to pilots flying into and out of the Airport.
1 CONCLUSION
The proposed Ordinance allows for a City Sponsored event allowing families to use Safe and Sane fireworks at the Airport. This request is submitted for City Council consideration and action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Staff has determined that the exemption applies in this case because the proposed procedural changes would not result in a direct or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and the proposed ordinance is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have potential for causing significant effect on the environment. Therefore, the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Doug McCoun
Fire Chief
City of Maria
REVIEWED/CONCUR:
________________________
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
2 ORDINANCE NO. 2025-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA AMENDING TITLE 15, CHAPTER 15. 32 ENTITLED “ADOPTION OF THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC), SECTION 15.32.890, SUBSECTION 5609.1.4-r OF THE MARINA MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
1. Title 15 , Chapter 15.32 amended. Title 15, Chapter 15.32 entitled “Adoption of the California Fire Code” Section 15.32.890, Subsection 5609.1.4 -r is hereby amended to read, “ No Fireworks shall be sold or discharged on the Marina Municipal Airport property, except by approval of the City’s Fire Chief during a City -sponsored event in an area designated by the Chief. Such fireworks must be certified as “safe and sane” by the State Fire Marshal's Office.”
2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on thirty (30) days after its final passage and adoption.
3. Posting of Ordinance. Within fifteen (15) days after the passage of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause it to be posted in the three (3) public places designated by resolution of the City Council.
The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Marina duly held on March 6, 2025, and was passed and adopted at a regular meeting duly held on May 20, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
3 EXHIBIT A
Section 15.32.890, Subsection 5609.1.4-r is hereby amended to read, “ No Fireworks shall be sold or discharged on the Marina Municipal Airport property, except by approval of the City’s Fire Chief during a City-sponsored event in an area designated by the Chief. Such fireworks must be certified as “safe and sane” by the State Fire Marshal's Office.” 4 April 29, 2025 Item No. 13a
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of May 6, 2025
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 2025-,
RECEIVING MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT’S 2024 -2025 ANNUAL REPORT
REQUEST:
It is requested that the City Council consider:
1. Adopting Resolution No. 2025-, receiving Marina Police Department’s 2024-2025 Annual Military Equipment Report; and
2. Approve the proposed addition of four (4) new drones to the department’s inventory:
• Three (3) drones to be funded by the City at an estimated cost of $20,000 each, totaling $60,000.
• One (1) drone to be funded using opioid settlement proceeds at no cost to the general fund.
BACKGROUND:
On September 30, 2021, California Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) was signed into law. California Government Code §§ 7070, 7071, and 7072 codify the requirements established by AB 481 for law
enforcement’s acquisition, use, and funding of “military equipment.” The Marina City Council previously approved Marina Police Department Policy #707 – Military Equipment, and the associated Military Equipment use by ordinance 2022-02 on April 19, 2022.
A
NALYSIS:
In enacting AB 481, the Legislature stated the public has a right to know about any funding, acquisition, or use of military equipme nt by state or loca l government officia ls to increase transparency, accountability, and oversight. The same applies to the public’s right to participate in any government agency’s decision to fund, acquire, or use such equipment. The current policy and inventory list are located on the Marina Police Department’s website – www.marinapolice.com The 2025–2026 Annual Military Equipment Report includes the following components:
• A full inventory audit and equipment accountability summary • Usage statistics (20 drone deployments; no use of force incidents involving firearms or less-lethal tools
• Public engagement feedback (no complaints or concerns reported) • Annual operational cost estimates
• Documentation of mandated training and operational protocols Four additional drones are requested due to aging drone technology and increased operational demand. These new units will enhance Marina PD’s capabilities for tactical response, search and rescue, disaster monitoring, and real -time situational awareness.
The current drone inventory will be retained as backup to ensure continuity of operations in the event of technical failure or simultaneous deployments.
CONCLUSION:
Approval of this report and the proposed drone acquisitions will ensure that the Marina Police Department remains in full compliance with AB 481, continues to uphold transparency with the public, and responsibly modernizes its aerial capabilities. One drone will be fully funded through opioid lawsuit proceeds, while three additional drones will be acquired using budgeted city funds.
Respectfully submitted:
Randy Hopkins
Chief of Police
City of Marina
REVIEW/CONCUR
Layne Long
City Manager
City of Marina
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA ACCEPTING MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT’S 2024-2025 ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT REPORT PURSUANT TO AB481
WHEREAS, the Marina Police Department has submitted its 2024-2025 Annual Military Equipment Report, Pursuant to California Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) which was signed into law on September 30, 2021. California Government Code §§ 7070, 7071, and 7072 codify the requirements established by AB 481 for law enforcement’s acquisition, use, and funding of “military equipment”; and
WHEREAS, the Marina Police Department has presented the Marina Police Department’s 2024- 2025 Annual Report (“EXHIBIT A”) to the City Council to review, accept and file.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Council of the City of Marina does hereby:
1. Receive the Marina Police Department’s 2024-2025 Annual Military Equipment Report; and
2. Approve the proposed addition of four (4) new drones to the department’s inventory:
• Three (3) drones to be funded by the City at an estimated cost of $20,000 each, totaling $60,000.
• One (1) drone to be funded using opioid settlement proceeds at no cost to the general fund.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on the 6th day of May 2025, by the following vote:
AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Bruce Delgado, Mayor
ATTEST:
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
1 | P a g e
EXHIBIT A
Marina Police Department Annual Military Equipment Report 2024-2025
California Government Code §§ 7070, 7071, and 7072
On September 30, 2021, California Assembly Bill 481 (AB 481) was signed into law. California Government Code §§ 7070, 7071, and 7072 codify the requirements established by AB 481 for law enforcement’s acquisition, use, and funding of “military equipment.” In enacting AB 481, the Legislature stated the public has a right to know about any funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment by state or local government officials to increase transparency, accountability, and oversight. The same applies to the public’s right to participate in any government agency’s decision to fund, acquire, or use such equipment.
The bill required law enforcement agencies that seek to continue the use of military equipment acquired prior to January 1, 2022, to receive approval from their governing body prior to May 1, 2022. The Marina City Council previously approved Marina Police Department Policy #707 – Military Equipment, and the associated Military Equipment Inventory by ordinance 2022-02 on April 19, 2022. The current policy and inventory list are located on the Marina Police Department’s website – www.marinapolice.com California Government Code § 7072 requires law enforcement agencies to prepare annually, a Military Equipment Report. The annual Military Equipment Report is required to contain the following information:
• A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use; • A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment; • The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response; • The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report; • The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment; and, • If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.
This annual Military Equipment Report satisfies the reporting requirements outlined in California Government Code § 7072.
A complaint, concern or question related to Military Equipment utilization by the Marina Police Department can be made through any of the below listed methods:
Email: [email protected] Web:
https://www.marinapolice.com
By phone: (831) 884-1210
By mail: Marina Police Department
Attn: Military Equipment Use Coordinator 211 Hillcrest Avenue, Marina, CA 93933
2 | P a g e
The following is a summary of the Military Equipment owned and maintained by the Marina Police Department as defined by California Government Code §7070:
Item Quantity
Owned
Gov’t Code
Subsection
Semi-Automatic Rifles 23 7070(c)(10)
Bolt-Action Precision Rifles 2 7070(c)(10)
Mavic Mini 2, Mavic Enterprise, Mavic Air 2 4 7070(c)(1) 40mm Less Lethal Launchers - Single 6 7070(c)(14)
40mm Less Lethal Launchers - Multi 1 7070(c)(14)
The following is a summary of the Military Equipment used by the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit. The Marina Police Department does not own or maintain this equipment; however, the military equipment may be used by members of the MPRSRU (SWAT) during a critical incident in the City of Marina. (California Government Code §7071(a)(1)(D))
Item Gov’t Code Subsection
Unmanned, Remotely Piloted, Powered Ground Vehicle
7070(c)(1)
7071(a)(1)(D)
Rescue Vehicle (Lenco Bearcat Armored Vehicle)
7070(c)(3)
7071(a)(1)(D)
Workhorse Commercial Van
7070(c)(5)
7071(a)(1)(D)
Flashbang Grenades, Explosive Breaching Tools, Tear Gas, and Pepper Balls
7070(c)(12)
7071(a)(1)(D)
Remington 870 Breaching Shotgun
7070(c)(10)
7071(a)(1)(D)
37mm Less lethal Launcher
7070(c)(10)
7071(a)(1)(D)
BolaWrap 150 Restraint Device – Qty 4
7070(c)(14)
3 | P a g e
QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE §7070(c)(1)
Description: Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered arial and ground vehicles Quantity: 2-Mavic Mini 2, 1-Mavic Enterprise, 1-Mavic Air 2.
Intention to Acquire More: Yes (4) More Drones))
Capabilities: Vehicles are capable of being remotely navigated to provide scene information and intelligence in the form of video and still images transmitted to first responders.
Expected lifespan: 5-Years
Manufacturer’s description: Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) comprises an unmanned aircraft and the equipment necessary for the safe and efficient operation of that aircraft.
The system generally includes a fixed or rotary-wing (tethered or non- thethered) aircraft and a ground control station.
Purpose(s)/Authorized Use: To enhance the safety of potentially dangerous situations by providing first responders with the ability to monitor video feed from vehicle cameras of hazardous areas prior to, or in lieu of, sending in personnel.
UAS/Drone/Aerial platforms may be used for search and rescue; suspect apprehension crime scene documentation; tactical operations; scene security; hazard monitoring; identification and mitigation; response to emergency calls; crisis communications; legally authorized surveillance.
Initial costs: Approximately $16,000
Annual costs: Approximately $1,000 (ammunition, repair parts, batteries, etc.) Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws. Any use of UAS/Drone platforms will be in strict accordance with constitutional and privacy rights and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations.
Procedural: Marina PD Policies - 612 (UAS Operations)
Required training: Marina PD provides internal training for staff members prior to allowing them to operate the UAS(s). Prior to piloting any UAS/Drone, a staff members must secure an FAA Remote Pilot License and complete training required by the FAA Certificate of Authorization (COA).
Other notes: The Marina PD operates under a Certificate of Authorization (COA) granted by the FAA.
Summary of how the military
equipment was
used and the purpose of its
use:
The UAS/Drone/Aerial platforms were deployed and used a total of 20 times in the past year for law enforcement activity related to the following:
UAS/Drone/Aerial platforms may be used for search and rescue; suspect apprehension crime scene documentation; tactical operations; scene security; hazard monitoring; identification and mitigation; response to emergency calls; crisis communications; legally
Complaints of Concerns: authorized surveillance. No complaints or concerns received Audits, violations, actions: During a training flight the Mavic Enterprise was damaged and repaired with budget operating funds. Marina PD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial and ground vehicles were accounted for in the inventory. There were no violations of related departmental policies regarding use of this equipment. No additional actions needed.
4 | P a g e
QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE §7070(c)(3)
Description: MPRSRU Rescue Vehicle (Lenco Bearcat Armored Vehicle) Quantity: 1 (owned by collaborating law enforcement agency for MPRSRU SWAT Team) Intention to Acquire
More:
No
Capabilities: Unit is capable of transporting personnel and equipment while providing them with armored protection. It also has a breaching apparatus that can be attached Expected lifespan: 10-Years
Manufacturer’s
description:
The Lenco BearCat is the standard tactical armored vehicle for special operations units within the US Law Enforcement community. Since the early 2000s, agencies such as LAPD, LASD SEB, NYPD ESU, Boston PD and hundreds of Federal, State and Local Law Enforcement agencies have made the BearCat part of their standard operating procedure. The Bearcat has excellent on-road driving characteristics and maneuverability in tight urban settings. The large floor plan seats 10 – 12 fully equipped officers.
Purpose(s)/Authorized
Use:
The SRU Rescue Vehicle (Lenco Bearcat Armored Vehicle) is intended for use during critical incidents including, but not limited to: (a) Hostage situations; (b) Barricaded subject incidents; (c) Active shooter situations; (d) High risk arrest and search warrants; (e) Any threat of explosive devices; (f) Other situations where ballistic protection is necessary for the protection of personnel. The SRU Rescue Vehicle will not be deployed for situations such as peaceful protests or demonstrations where violence is not threatened toward the public, property, or law enforcement personnel. When deploying the vehicle, one must consider how its use or misuse could create fear or distrust in the community and take steps to mitigate those negative effects. The SRU Rescue vehicle may be deployed for exhibition at community-based events for the purpose of educating and familiarizing the public with its use and purpose.
Initial costs: $400K through UASI grant (MPRSU)
Annual costs: No cost to the Marina Police Department
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws.
Procedural: Marina PD Policies - 614 (High Risk Operations) Required training: The SRU Rescue Vehicle is driven by approved personnel who have received training in the vehicle’s operation. The training includes both classroom and practical driving exercises. Operators also receive scenario -based training to include the decision -making process as to how it should and should not be deployed. Scenario based training includes constitutional and community policing principles as it relates to SRU Rescue Vehicle deployment. All MPRSRU members are required to complete an initial POST Certified 80-hour basic SWAT course, 120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT update training bi-annually.
Other notes: The Marina Police Department participates in the Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit (MPRSRU) SWAT Team. This equipment is registered to the Marina Police Department and utilized by MPRSU. While the Marina Police Department does not own this equipment, it could be used in Marina by MPRSRU if they are deployed to an incident within city limits. It may also be used in Marina at community events for educational and familiarization purposes.
5 | P a g e
Summary of how the
military equipment was
used and the purpose of
its use:
The SRU Rescue Vehicle (Lenco Bearcat Armored Vehicle) is intended for use during critical incidents including, but not limited to: (a) Hostage situations; (b) Barricaded subject incidents; (c) Active shooter situations; (d) High risk arrest and search warrants; (e) Any threat of expl osive devices; (f) Other situations where ballistic protection is necessary for the protection of personnel. This unit was utilized several times during high risk SRU missions and utilized for crew transport and safety. Most recently providing protection to officers from a person firing a high-powered Rifle in the county Monterey.
Complaints of
Concerns:
No complaints or concerns received
Audits, violations,
actions:
This equipment is registered (DMV) to the City of Marina, but it was paid for by a grant awarded to the MPRSRU. It is maintained and operated by the member agencies of the MPRSRU. There were no violations of related departmental policies regarding use of this equipment. No additional actions needed. 6 | P a g e
QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE §7070(c)(10)
Description: Bolt-Action Precision and Semiautomatic Rifles and Ammunition Quantity: 25 (existing)
Intention to Acquire
More:
No
Capabilities: Rifles are capable of firing a .223 caliber or .556 projectile bullet Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer’s
description:
(8)-The Bushmaster XM15 -E2S The Bushmaster XM15-E2S is a lightweight, magazine-fed, gas -operated semi -automatic rifle, chambered in .223 cal. It is a semi-automatic version of the M16 rifle sold for the civilian and law enforcement markets.
(6)- The Colt AR‐15 is a lightweight, magazine‐fed, gas‐operated semi‐automatic rifle, chambered in 5.56/.223 cal. It is a semi‐ automatic version of the M16 rifle sold for the civilian and law enforcement markets.
(2)- Colt M4 Carbine is a lightweight, magazine‐fed, gas‐operated semi‐ automatic rifle, chambered in 5.56/.223 cal. It is a semi‐automatic version of the M16 rifle sold for the civilian and law enforcement markets.
(2)- The Colt LE6940 is a lightweight, magazine‐fed, gas‐operated semi‐ automatic rifle, chambered in 5.56/.223 cal. It is a semi‐automatic version of the M16 rifle sold for the civilian and law enforcement markets.
(5)- The Colt CR6933‐EPR (SBR) is a lightweight, magazine‐fed, gas‐operated, short barreled, semi‐ automatic rifle. It is a semi‐automatic, short‐barreled version of the AR‐15 rifle sold for the law enforcement market. (1)-The Desert Tech SRS -M2 is a magazine fed, "Bullpup" style, bolt action precision rifle. It is sold for use in the military, law enforcement and the civilian markets. The barrel can be changed out to accommodate different calibers, such as .308 Win, 6.5 CM and .338 LM.
(1)-The FN SPR is a magazine fed, bolt action, precision rifle, chambered in .308. It is sold for use in the military, law enforcement and the civilian markets.
Purpose(s)/Authorized
Use:
Officers may deploy the patrol rifle in any circumstance where the officer can articulate a reasonable expectation that the rifle may be needed. Examples of some general guidelines for deploying the patrol rifle may include but are not limited to:
(1) Situations where the member reasonably anticipates an armed encounter. 2) When a member is faced with a situation that may require accurate and effective fire at long range.
3) Situations where a member reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect's firepower.
4) When a member reasonably believes that there may be a need to fire on a barricaded person or a person with a hostage.
(5) When a member reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor.
(6) When authorized or requested by a supervisor.
When needed to euthanize an animal.
Initial costs: Approximately $52,500
Annual costs: Approximately $3000 (ammunition, repair parts, batteries, etc.) Legal: CA Penal Code 33220(b). All other applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing short- barreled rifles and police use of force. 7 | P a g e
Procedural: Marina PD Policies - 300 (Use of Force), 312 (Firearms), 424 (Rapid Response and Deployment),
Required training: CA POST certified 16-hour patrol rifle course & 4 hours annually / qualification annually
Other notes: These rifles are standard issue service weapons for Marina PD officers and as a result exempted from the Military Equipment Use Policy per CA Gov’t Code §7070 (c)(10). They have been included in this document for transparency.
Summary of how the
military equipment was
used and the purpose
of its use:
The rifles were deployed within the guidelines. Over the past 12 months, Marina officers have deployed the rifle, but not fired, in the following circumstances:
(1) Situations where the member reasonably anticipates an armed encounter. 2) When a member is faced with a situation that may require accurate and effective fire at long range.
3) Situations where a member reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect's firepower.
4) When a member reasonably believes that there may be a need to fire on a barricaded person or a person with a hostage.
(5) When a member reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor.
When authorized or requested by a supervisor.
Complaints of
Concerns:
No Complaints or concerns were received
Audits, violations,
actions:
Marina PD conducted an audit of equipment and accounted for all the rifles.
There were no violations of related departmental policies regarding use of this equipment. No additional actions needed.
8 | P a g e
QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE §7070(c)(14)
Description: 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions Quantity
(existing/sought):
6 (one for each police vehicle)
Intention to Acquire
More:
No
Capabilities: The 40mm Less Lethal Launcher is capable of firing 40mm Kinetic Energy Munitions, known as sponge projectiles.
Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer’s
description:
Penn Arms 40MM Single Shot Launcher with collapsing stock. T h e L140-3/4 – is a 40mm single-shot break-open action launcher with a rifled barrel, collapsible stock, and combo rail. It’s features include: Double- action trigger, trigger lock push button, and hammer lock safeties.
Purpose(s)/Authorized
Use:
The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a less-lethal use of force option to subdue violent and/or resistive individuals.
Initial costs: $7900
Annual costs: $200 (includes sponge projectiles for training) Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force.
Procedural: Marina PD Policies - 312 (Firearms), 308 (Control Devices and Techniques) Required training: Two (2) hours of initial training and (2) hours every (2) years (includes qualification)
Other notes: (4) additional single shot launchers will replace the current aged-out less lethal shotguns.
Summary of how the
military equipment was
used and the
purpose of its use:
The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a less-lethal use of force option to subdue violent and/or resistive individuals. While the launcher has deployed in the field during active incidents, no actual field use on a person was reported.
Complaints of
Concerns:
No Complaints or concerns were received.
Audits, violations,
actions:
Marina PD conducted an audit of the equipment and accounted for all 40mm Less Lethal Launchers in inventory. There were no violations of related departmental policies regarding the use of this equipment. No additional actions needed. 9 | P a g e
QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE §7070(c)(14)
Description: 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions Quantity: 1
Intention to Acquire
More:
No
Capabilities: The 40mm Less Lethal Multi-Launcher is capable of firing 40mm Kinetic Energy Munitions, known as sponge projectiles.
Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's
description:
Penn Arms 40MM Pump Action, Multi Shot Launcher. PGL65-40 – A 40mm, pump action, multi launcher with a rifled barrel, collapsible stock and combo rail. Features include: Double-action trigger, trigger lock push button and hammer lock safeties.
Purpose(s)/Authorized
Use:
The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a less-lethal use of force option to subdue violent and/or resistive individuals.
Initial cost: $2,000
Annual costs: $200 (includes sponge projectiles for training) Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force.
Procedural: Marina PD Policies - 312 (Firearms), 308 (Control Devices and Techniques) Required training: Two (2) hours of initial training and (2) hours every (2) years (includes qualification) Other: (4) additional single shot launchers will replace the current aged-out less lethal shotguns
Summary of how the
equipment was used
and the purpose of its
use:
The 40mm Less Lethal Launchers and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a less-lethal use of force option to subdue violent and/or resistive individuals. While the launcher has deployed in the field during active incidents, no actual field use on a person was reported.
Complaints or
Concerns:
No Complaints or concerns were received.
Audits, violations,
Actions:
Marina PD conducted an audit of the equipment and the 40mm Less Lethal Multi- Launcher was accounted for in inventory. There were no violations of related departmental policies regarding use of this equipment. No additional actions needed.
10 | P a g e
QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT OWNED/UTILIZED BY THE MARINA POLICE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT CODE §7070(c)(14
Description: BolaWrap® 150 Kenetic Energy Munitions Device Quantity: 1
Intention to Acquire
More:
No
Capabilities: The BolaWrap® 150 is a remote restraint device that discharges a Kevlar® cord to restrain non-compliant individuals from a range of 10-25 feet.
Expected lifespan: 15 years
Manufacturer's
description:
The BolaWrap® 150 is a remote restraint device that discharges a Kevlar® cord to restrain
non-compliant individuals from a range of 10-25 feet.
Purpose(s)/Authorized
Use:
The BolaWrap® is a remote restraint device and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a less-lethal use of force option to subdue violent and/or resistive individuals.
Initial cost: $5,200
Annual costs: $160 (projectiles for training)
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws governing police use of force.
Procedural: Marina PD Policies - 312 (Firearms), 308 (Control Devices and Techniques) Required training: Two (2) hours of initial training and (2) hours every (2) years (includes qualification)
Other: Assigned and stored in SRU vehicles, as a use of force option for Monterey Peninsula Regional SRU operators.
Summary of how the
equipment was used and
the purpose of its
use:
The BolaWrap® is a remote restraint device and Kinetic Energy Munitions are intended for use as a less -lethal use of force option to be used to subdue violent and/or resistive individuals. This device is assigned to MPRSRU and has not been deployed within our jurisdiction.
Complaints or Concerns: No Complaints or concerns were received.
Audits, violations,
Actions:
This device is assigned to MPRSRU vehicles and is not maintained within the Marina Police Department. It’s inclusion in this report is for transparency purposes as a Marina Police officer potentially could deploy this device, and/or it could potentially be deployed by the MPRSRU, within the city limits of Marina The item has been accounted for during equipment audits. There were no violations of the military equipment use policy concerning this device. No action needed. 11 | P a g e
MPRSRU Equipment Acquisition Request
QUALIFYING EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION REQUEST GOVERNMENT
CODE §7070(c)(1)
Description: LDV Inc. Custom Specialty Vehicles - Crisis Negotiation Team Command Vehicle
Quantity: 0 (Approved in 2022, purchased through grant cycle for 2024, to be owned by Monterey PD and utilized by
MPRSRU – CNT)
Capabilities: Vehicles modified to act as Negotiations Operations Center at critical incidents
Expected lifespan: 20 years
Manufacturer's description: 2022 Ford E-450 Cutaway - Emergency Response Vehicle - Mobile Command Vehicle
Purpose(s)/Authorized
Use:
This vehicle will provide a designated Negotiations
Operations Center (NOC) in a constant state of
operational readiness for the MPRSRU Crisis
Negotiations Team (CNT) that will aid in the
resolution of crisis incidents. Also utilized for
community outreach events such as National Night
Out, Public Safety Outreach, etc.
Initial cost:
$200,000 initial outlay to be reimbursed through the
Homeland Security Grant Program - Urban Areas
Security Initiative. Will not be procured until October 2023 in FY 24. *Note: Item was approved by the
Monterey City Council by Ordinance 3649 in 2022.
Annual costs: $2,500 / year maintenance and upkeep
Legal: All applicable State, Federal and Local laws
governing police use of force
Procedural: Marina PD Policies - 614 (High Risk Operations)
Required training:
All MPRSRU members are required to complete an
initial POST certified 80 -hour basic SWAT Course,
120 hours of annual training, and 24 hours of SWAT
update training bi- annually. MPRSRU members train
on this piece of equipment 4 hours annually.
Other:
The Marina Police Department participates in the
Monterey Peninsula Regional Special Response Unit
CNT Team (MPRSRU). This equipment will be
registered to the Monterey Police and operated by
MPRSRU CNT. This equipment could be used in the
city of Marina by MPRSRU/CNT if they are deployed
to an incident within city limits. This is
being included in the Marina annual report for
transparency purposes.
May 2, 2025 Item No. 13b
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of May 6, 2025
CITY COUNCIL CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-,
APPROVING THE 2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY WITH RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT S, AND; AUTHORIZ E STAFF TO
REVIEW COMMENTS FROM CITY COUNCIL AND RETURN THE
SURVEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE ON MAY
20, 2025
REQUEST:
It is requested that the City Council:
1. Consider adopting Resolution No. 2025-, approving the 20 25 Engineering and Traffic Survey with recommended speed limits; and
2. Authorize staff to review comments from the City Council and return the Survey recommendations for final acceptance on May 20, 2025
BACKGROUND:
California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 40802b requires that Engineering and Traffic Surveys for speed limits must be conducted once every five years by governing municipalities.
In order for the speed limit on a collector or arterial street to be enforceable by the Police Department through the use of radar or other electronic device to measure speed, the speed limit must be set in accordance with a n Engineering and Traffic Survey. The California Vehicle Code states that if a posted speed limit is not justified by a traffic and engineering survey, the City may not prove a violation of the posted limit by the use of radar or any other electronic device (CVC 40802).
On November 20, 2024 , t he City entered into a Service Agreement with the on -call traffic engineering firm Kimley Horn to conduct and draft an Engineering and Traffic Survey. This Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) is intended to serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Marina.
ANALYSIS:
Engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) for speed limits are regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802(a) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the national Uniform Vehicle Code. Engineering and traffic surveys may be extended to every seven (7) years if criteria are met, or every ten (10) years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic condit ions have occurred as specified in Section 40802(c) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC).
In addition, an engineering and traffic survey should be conducted on newly constructed roadways or roadways where the roadway conditions have significantly changed. The latest Assembly Bill (AB)-43-Traffic Safety would extend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted more the 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years.
The California Governor’s office approved AB 43 on 8 October 2021, which included amendments to Sections 627, 21400, 22352, 22354, 22358, and 40802 of, and to add Sections 22358.6, 22358.7, 22358.8, and 22358.9 to, the California Vehicle Code (CVC), relating to traffic safety.
Previous E&TS study was conducted in the Year 2020 and included 43 roadway segments. This current E&TS study includes a total of 45 roadway segments. The draft speed limit recommendations for the 45 roadway segments are summarized in “ EXHIBIT A ”. The entire report has been attached as “EXHIBIT B”.
At the regular meeting of May 1, 2025 the Public Works Commission received an information update on the 2025 Engineering & Traffic Survey . The Commission passed a 3 to 1 motion to recommend a further reduction of 5 mph for Street #4 (Del Monte – from Reservation to Beach) and to re-evaluate Streets #9 and 10 (Reservation – from Crescent to Salinas) for possibly a third segment between them.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The CVC provides that the new speed limit is enforceable when signs are erected giving notice of the new limits. The cost to purchase and install a new speed limit sign is approximately $300 per location and approximately $ 800 per road marking location . The estimated cost for new speed limit signs and road markings will be generated once the final speed limits are adopted into the Municipal Code and financed from Gas Tax/Street Funds for signs & supplies.
CONCLUSION:
The recommendations in Exhibit A shall be brought back to Council on May 20 th for proposed adoption into the City’s Municipal Code Section 10.60. This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________
Ismael Hernandez
Public Works Director
City of Marina
_____________________________
Layne P. Long
City Manager
City of Marina
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARINA
APPROVING THE 2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY WITH
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMITS; AND AUTHORIZE STAFF TO REVIEW
COMMENTS FROM CITY COUNCIL AND RETURN THE SURVEY
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE ON MAY 20, 2025
WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 40802b requires that Engineering and Traffic Surveys for speed limits must be conducted once every five years by governing municipalities , and;
WHEREAS, in order for the speed limit on a collector or arterial street to be enforceable by the Police Department through the use of radar or other electronic device to measure speed, the speed limit must be set in accordance with a n Engineering and Traffic Survey. The California Vehicle Code states that if a posted speed limit is not justified by a traffic and engineering survey, the City may not prove a violation of the posted limit by the use of radar or any other electronic device (CVC 40802) , and;
WHEREAS, on November 20, 2024, the City entered into a Service Agreement with the on -call traffic engineering firm Kimley Horn to conduct and draft an Engineering and Traffic Survey. This Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) is intended to serve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of Marina, and;
WHEREAS, Engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) for speed limits are regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpose of complying with Section 40802(a) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the national Uniform Vehicle Code .
Engineering and traffic surveys may be extended to every seven (7) years if criteria are met, or every ten (10) years if a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traff ic conditions have occurred as specified in Section 40802(c) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC), and;
WHEREAS, in addition, an engineering and traffic survey should be conducted on newly constructed roadways or roadways where the roadway conditions have significantly changed. The latest Assembly Bill (AB) -43-Traffic Safety would extend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted more the 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years, and;.
WHEREAS, the California Governor’s office approved AB 43 on 8 October 2021, which included amendments to Sections 627, 21400, 22352, 22354, 22358, and 40802 of, and to add Sections 22358.6, 22358.7, 22358.8, and 22358.9 to, the California Vehicle Code (CVC), relating to traffic safety, and;
WHEREAS, previous E&TS study was conducted in the Year 2020 and included 43 roadway segments. This current E&TS study includes a total of 45 roadway segments. The draft speed limit recommendations for the 45 roadway segments are summarized in “Exhibit A”. The entire report has been attached as “Exhibit B”, and;
Resolution 2025-
Page Two
WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of May 1, 2025 the Public Works Commission received an information update on the 2025 Engineering & Traffic Survey . The Commission passed a 3 to 1 motion to recommend a further reduction of 5 mph for Street #4 (Del Monte – from Reservation to Beach) and to re-evaluate Streets #9 and 10 (Reservation – from Crescent to Salinas) for possibly a third segment between them, and;
WHEREAS, the CVC provides that the new speed limit is enforceable when signs are erected giving notice of the new limits. The cost to purchase and install a new speed limit sign is approximately $300 per location and approximately $800 per road marking location. The estimated cost for new speed limit signs and road markings will be generated once the final speed limits are adopted into the Municipal Code and financed from Gas Tax/Street Funds for signs & supplies , and;
WHEREAS, the recommendations in Exhibit A shall be brought back to Council on May 20 th for proposed adoption into the City’s Municipal Code Section 10.60. This request is submitted for City Council consideration and possible action.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Marina does hereby:
1. Approve the 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey with recommended speed limits, and;
2. Authorize staff to review comments from City Council and return the Survey recommendations for final acceptance on May 20, 2025
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Marina at a regular meeting duly held on May 6, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_________________________
ATTEST: Bruce C. Delgado, Mayor
_______________________________
Anita Sharp, Deputy City Clerk
April 2025
City of Marina - Engineering and Traic Survey for Speed Limits Table 1: City of Marina – Draft Speed Limit Recommendations
1 Imjin Parkway State Route 1 California Avenue 0.83 0.99 No 50 50 50 Yes 45 -5 2 Imjin Parkway California Avenue Reservation Road 0.4 4 1.07 No 25 39.15 N/A (See Note 1) No 3 Del Monte Boulevard SR1/Reindollar Avenue Reservatio n Road 0.41 0.99 No 40 45.10 40 Yes 4 Del Monte Boulevard Reservation Road Beach Road 0.00 0.99 No 40 42 35 No 35 -5 5 Del Monte Boulevard Beach Road Marina Greens Drive 0. 00 1.07 No 40 45.15 40 No 40 6 Reservation Road Dunes Drive Beach Road 0.00 1.07 No 35 3 4 35 No 35 7 Beach Road Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard 0.46 1 .07 No 30 33.15 30 No 30 8 Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard Crescent Avenue 0.69 0.99 No 35 39 35 No 35 9 Reservation Road Crescent Avenue California Avenue 0.21 0.99 No 40 43 40 No 40 10 Reservation Road California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0.00 0.99 No 45 51 45 No 45 11 Reservation Road Salinas Avenue Imjin Parkway 0.50 1. 33 No 55 57 55 No 55 12 Reservation Road Imjin Parkway Blanco Road 0.39 0.99 N o 55 60.15 55 No 55 13 8th Street 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 32.60 25 No 25 14 8th Street 5th Avenue Inter-Garrison Road 0.00 1.07 No 40 41 35 No 35 -5 15 9th Street 1st Avenue 2nd Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 30 31 25 No 25 -5 16 2nd Avenue Divarty Street 8th Street 0.20 1.07 No 45 46 40 No 40 -5 17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 0.27 1.07 No 35 36 3 5 No 35 18 Beach Road Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard 2.03 1.07 Yes 35 35 30 No 30 -5 19 De Forest Road Beach Road Reservation Road 2.09 1.07 Yes 30 36 30 No 30 20 Crescent Avenue Quebrada Del Mar Reservation Road 0. 00 1.07 No 25 32 25 No 25 21 Crescent Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Aveneue 0.86 1.07 No 30 36 30 No 30 22 Cardoza Avenue Reservation Road Aaron Way (End) 0.0 0 1.07 No 30 35 30 No 30 23 Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard De Forest Road 0.00 1.07 No 30 28 25 No 25 -5 24 California Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Aveneue 0 .52 1.07 No 30 37 30 No 30 25 California Avenue Carmel Avenue Reindollar Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 32 30 No 30 5 Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
# Street Name
Segment
Posted
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Initial
Recommended
Speed Limit (MPH) Limit 1 Limit 2
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Change
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Safety Corridor
Or Area of High
Concentration of
Bicyclists or
Pedestrians
Draft
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Exhibit A to Staff Report
35 N/A (See Note 1)
April 2025
City of Marina - Engineering and Traic Survey for Speed Limits
# Street Name
Segment
Posted
Speed
Limit
(MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Initial
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
Change
Speed
Limit
(MPH) Limit 1 Limit 2
Segment
Collision
Rate (CR)
Expected
Collision
Rate (CR)
Segment
CR >
Expected
CR
26 California Avenue Reindollar Avenue Imjin Parkw ay 0.30 1.07 No 40 45 40 No 40 27 California Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0.00 1.07 No 30 28 30 No 30 28 Reindollar Avenue Del Monte
Boulevard California Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 34 25 No 25 29 Reindollar Avenue/Bostick
Avenue California Avenue Carmel Aveneue 0.00 1.07 No 30 33 25 No 25 -5 30 Carmel Avenue Del Monte
Boulevard California Avenue 0.70 1.07 No 25 31 25 No 25 31 Carmel Avenue California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 29 25 No 25 32 Salinas Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 0. 00 1.07 No 25 24 25 No 25 33 Paul Davis Drive Healy Avenue Marina Greens
Drive 0.00 1.07 No 30 25 25 No 25 -5
34 Patton Parkway Marina High School California Ave nue 2.30 1.07 Yes 40 41 35 No 35 -5 35 Crescent Avenue Patton Parkway Reindollar Avenue 0.00 1.07 No 25 30 25 No 25 36 Vaughan Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Aveneue 0.00 1.07 No 25 29 25 No 25 37 Seacrest Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 1.53 1.07 Yes 30 31.15 30 No 30 38 Sunset Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Aveneue 0 .00 1.07 No 25 31 25 No 25 39 Lake Drive Palm Avenue Reservation Road 1.50 1.07 Yes 25 36 25 No 25 40 Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte
Boulevard 0.00 1.07 No 25 28 25 No 25
41 Abrams Drive Preston Drive Imjin Parkway 1.93 1.07 Yes 30 34 30 No 30 42 Preston Drive Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway 0.00 1. 07 No 30 29.15 30 No 30 43 3rd Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0.00 1.07 No 25 27 25 No 25 44 Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway
(West) Preston Drive 0.00 1.07 No 25 35.15 30 No 30 5
45 Marina Heights Drive California Avenue Imjin Parkway 0.00 1.07 No 25 34 30 No 30 5 Notes
1. Roadway segment was under construction at the time of speed data collection. Therefore, no recommendations are made for this segment
ENGINEERING AND
TRAFFIC SURVEY
FOR Speed Limits
Prepared for:
EXHIBIT B TO
STAFF REPORT
City of Marina i May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ i
1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................1
1.1 Regulations and Guidelines ..................................................................................................... ............... 1
1.2 Requirements and Methodology of an Engineering and Traffic Study ............................................. 7
2.0 Speed Survey Evaluation ...............................................................................................8
2.1 Field Review ..................................................................................................... ....................................... 11
2.2 Statistical Analysis Factors ..................................................................................................... ................ 11
2.3 2014 California MUTCD and CVC Guidance ....................................................................................... 13
2.4 Data Collection ..................................................................................................... .................................. 14
2.5 Collision History ................................................... ................................................... ................................ 14
3.0 Results And Recommendations .................................................................................20
List of Figures
Figure 1: City of Marina Existing Posted Speed Limits .......................................................... 10 Figure 2: City of Marina Recommended Speed Limits ......................................................... 37
List of Tables
Table 1: Survey Locations and Limits Evaluated ...................................................................... 8 Table 2: 2022 California State Highways Collision Rates ...................................................... 14 Table 3: Collision History Summary at Study Segments (2020-2022) ................................. 16 Table 4: Collision Rate Summary at Study Segments ............................................................ 18 Table 5: Speed Survey Recommendations .............................................................................. 21
City of Marina 1
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Engineering and Traffic Survey is intended to s erve as the basis for the establishment and enforcement of speed limits for s elected streets within the City of Marina. This survey was authorized by the City and independently conducted by the private consulting firm Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (Kimley-Horn).
Engineering and traffic surveys for speed limits ar e regularly conducted once every five (5) years by governing municipalities for the purpo se of complying with Section 40802(a) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the national Uniform Vehicle Code .
Engineering and traffic surveys may be extended to every seven (7) years if criteria is met, or every ten (10) years if a registered engine er evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadw ay or traffic conditions have occurred as specified in Section 40802(c) of the California Vehicle Code (CVC ). In addition, an engineering and traffic survey should be conducted on newly constructed roadways or roadways where the roadway conditions h ave significantly changed. The latest Assembly Bill (AB)-43-Traffic Safety would ex tend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey condu cted more the 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evalua ted by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years.
The California Governor’s office approved AB 43 on 8 October 2021, which included amendments to Sections 627, 21400, 22352, 22354, 223 58, and 40802 of, and to add Sections 22358.6, 22358.7, 22358.8, and 22358.9 to, the California Vehicle Code (CVC), relating to traffic safety.
1.1 Regulations and Guidelines
Division 11, Chapter 7, of the 2023 California Vehi cle Code defines the California Speed Laws. Section 22352 of the CVC indicates that prima facie speed limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorize d in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a)Fifteen miles per hour:
(1) When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway f or a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any
City of Marina 2
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
railway grade crossing where a human flag person is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal de vice is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(2) When traversing any intersection of highways if dur ing the last 100 feet of the driver's approach to the intersection the driver do es not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any tr affic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distan ce of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals.
(3) On any alley.
(b)Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1) On any highway, in any business or residence distri ct unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.
(2) When approaching or passing a school building or th e grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school e ither during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limi t shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standa rd "SCHOOL" warning sign.
For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(3) When passing a senior center or other facility prim arily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway a nd posted with a standard "SENIOR" warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determinati on that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority ma y request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highwa ys Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those
City of Marina 3
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
Division 1 of the CVC defines a business district and residence district in Section 235 and 515, respectively.
A "business district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto (a) upon one side of which highway, for a d istance of 600 feet, 50 percent or more of the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by buildings in use for business, or (b) upon both sides of which h ighway, collectively, for a distance of 300 feet, 50 percent or more of the con tiguous property fronting thereon is so occupied. A business district may be longer than the distances specified in this section if the above ratio of bui ldings in use for business to the length of the highway exists.”
1 A "residence district" is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district, (a) upon o ne side of which highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous p roperty fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures, or (b) upon both sides of which highway, collectively, wit hin a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is o ccupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. A residence district may be longer than one-quarter of a mile if the above rati o of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway exists.” 2 Section 22357(a) permits the establishment of speed limits greater than 25 mph upon street other than state highway, based on the following text:
“(a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that a speed greater than 25 miles p er hour would facilitate the orderly movement of vehicular traffic and would be reasonable and safe upon any street other than a state highway otherwise sub ject to a prima facie limit of 25 miles per hour, the local authority may by ordin ance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 miles per hour or a maximum speed limit of 65 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and i s reasonable and safe. The declared prima facie or maximum speed limit shall b e effective when appropriate
1 California Legislative Information, California Law, Vehicle Code, Division 1, Section 235, 2023. 2 California Legislative Information, California Law, Vehicle Code, Division 1, Section 515, 2023.
City of Marina 4
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street and shall not thereafter be revised except upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey. This section does not apply to any 25-mile-per-hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds there of or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.”3
Therefore, the CVC allows local authorities to incr ease or decrease the prima facie limits by ordinance or resolution to appropriate limits as determined by an engineering and traffic survey. Posted speed limits not defined in the CVC or established by ordinance are not valid. The CVC requires that speed surveys must be performed with the use of radar or other electronic devices at locations wher e speed limits are to be enforced with the use of radar. The current survey must be compl eted within five years as specified in Section 40802(a); seven years as specified in Section 40802(c), or fourteen years as specified in Section 40802(c), of the date of the pr eceding survey. A survey allowed to expire passed the valid duration of the previous su rvey would constitute a speed trap as defined in Sections 40802(a) and 40802(b) of the CVC (with added amendments as per AB-43):
“(a) A “speed trap is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway measured as t o distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determi ned in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(2) A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under p aragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 2 2354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not jus tified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit invol ves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, o r school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8 .
(b) (1) For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as "local" on the "California Road System Maps," that are approved by
3 California Legislative Information, California Law, Vehicle Code, Division 11. Chapter 7, Section 22357(a), 2023.
City of Marina 5
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
the Federal Highway Administration and maintained b y the Department of Transportation. It may be defined as a "local street or road" if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupt ed length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445. (C) Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section "school zone" mean s that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof th at is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" w arning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. "School zone" also in cludes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a st andard "SCHOOL" warning sign.”
(3) For purposes of this section, “senior zone” mea ns that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4) For purposes of this section, “business activit y district” means a section of highway described in subdivision(b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sig n has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section.
“(c) (2) A “speed trap is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway measured as t o distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determi ned in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing th e time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
B) (i)A particular section of a highway or state hi ghway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by loc al ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, o r established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that pri ma facie speed limit is not
City of Marina 6
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
justified by an engineering and traffic survey cond ucted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the al leged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I)Except as specified in subclause (II), seven yea rs.(II)If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evalua tes the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limite d to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii)This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, business activity district, or speed limit adopted under Section 22358.7 or 22358.8.” 4 CVC Section 22358.8 (Retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limit) Option:
12af Local agency may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8.
Standard:
12ag Currently adopted speed limit or immediately p rior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after comp leting an E&TS, local agency finds that the speed limit is still more than reaso nable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&TS and if a registe red engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additiona l general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
12ah If local agency decides to use lower speed lim it based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&TS and finding that t he speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit not below the imm ediately prior speed limit.
Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).
Excerpts from the CVC are attached in the Appendix A.
4 California Legislative Information, California Law, Vehicle Code, Division 17. Chapter 3, Section 40802, 2023.
City of Marina 7
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
1.2 Requirements and Methodology of an Engineering and Traffic Study
Speed zones are primarily established to protect the public from the unreasonable behavior of reckless, unreliable, or otherwise dang erous drivers. Speed limits are generally established at or near the 85 th percentile speed, which is defined as the speed at or below which 85 percent of traffic is moving. Speed limits established on this basis conform to the consensus of those who drive on the roadways as to what speed is reasonable and safe and are not dependent on the ju dgment of one or a few individuals.
The Engineering and Traffic Survey, as defined in Sec tion 627 of the CVC, must consider the prevailing speeds, collision records, pedestria n and bicycle activity, and roadway traffic and roadside conditions not readily apparen t to the driver. Speed zones are also established to advise motorists of road conditions or hazards, which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, a field review of related road/traffic variables is conducted which is considered in combi nation with the statistical data and collision history of a particular roadway segment t o determine a safe and reasonable speed limit. The specific procedures used in the p erformance of an Engineering and Traffic Study are outlined in the 2014 California MUTCD . The statistical factors used to analyze the collected speed survey data and additio nal factors as noted in the 2014 California MUTCD to consider are defined in the following section.
City of Marina 8
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
2.0 SPEED SURVEY EVALUATION
Forty-five (45) locations were evaluated by Kimley- Horn and included in this report.
These roadway sections and limits of the sections a re listed in Table 1 . Also, Error! Reference source not found. shows the location of survey locations with their e xisting posted speed limits.
Table 1: Survey Locations and Limits Evaluated
S. No. Street Limit 1 Limit 2 Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
85 th Percentile
Speed (mph)
1 Imjin Parkway State Route 1 California Avenue 50 50 2** Imjin Parkway California Avenue Reservation Road 25 39.15 3 Del Monte
Boulevard
SR1/Reindollar
Avenue
Reservation Road 40 45.10
4 Del Monte
Boulevard
Reservation Road Beach Road 40 42
5 Del Monte
Boulevard
Beach Road Marina Greens Drive 40 45.15
6 Reservation Road Dunes Drive Beach Road 35 34
7 Reservation Road Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard 30 33.15 8 Reservation Road Del Monte
Boulevard
Crescent Avenue 35 39
9 Reservation Road Crescent Avenue California Avenue 45 43 10 Reservation Road California Avenue Salinas Aven ue 45 51 11 Reservation Road Salinas Avenue Imjin Parkway 55 57
12 Reservation Road Imjin Parkway Blanco Road 55 60.15 13 8th Street 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue 25 32.60
14 8th Street 5th Avenue Inter-Garrison Road 40 41
15 9th Street 1st Avenue 2nd Avenue 30 31
16 2nd Avenue Divarty Street 8th Street 45 46
17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 35 36
18 * Beach Road Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard 35 35 19 De Forest Road Beach Road Reservation Road 30 36 20 Crescent Avenue Quebrada Del Mar Reservation Roa d 25 32 21 Crescent Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 30 36 22 Cardoza Avenue Reservation Road Aaron Way (E nd) 30 35 23 Beach Road Del Monte
Boulevard
De Forest Road 30 28
24 California Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenu e 30 37 25 California Avenue Carmel Avenue Reindollar Avenue 25 32 26 California Avenue Reindollar Avenue Imjin Parkw ay 40 45 27 * California Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 30 28 28 Reindollar Avenue Del Monte
Boulevard
California Avenue 25 34
City of Marina 9
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
S. No. Street Limit 1 Limit 2 Posted Speed
Limit (mph)
85 th Percentile
Speed (mph)
29 Reindollar
Avenue/Bostick
Avenue
California Avenue Carmel Avenue 30 33
30 * Carmel Avenue Del Monte
Boulevard
California Avenue 25 31
31 * Carmel Avenue California Avenue Salinas Avenue 25 29 32 Salinas Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 25 24 33 Paul Davis Drive Healy Avenue Marina Greens Drive 30 25 34 Patton Parkway Marina High School California Ave nue 40 41 35 Crescent Avenue Patton Parkway Reindollar Avenue 25 30 36 * Vaughan Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 25 2 9 37 Seacrest Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 30 31.15 38 Sunset Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 25 31 39 * Lake Drive Palm Avenue Reservation Road 25 36
40 * Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte Boulevard 25 28 41 Abrams Drive Preston Drive Imjin Parkway 30 34
42 Preston Drive Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway 30 29.1 5
43 3rd Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 25 27
44 Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway (West) Preston Drive 25 35.15 45 Marina Heights
Drive
California Avenue Imjin Parkway 25 34
Notes:
*- No posted speed limit sign exists in the field. Existing posted speed limit is per City Resolution No. 2020-54 **- Posted speed limit is 25 MPH due to on-going construction
City of Marina 10
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Figure 1: City of Marina Existing Posted Speed Limi ts
City of Marina 11
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
2.1 Field Review
Speed data was collected using manual radar surveys performed by a sub-consultant to Kimley-Horn, IDAX Data Solutions (IDAX). Each of th e radar speed checks were made from an inconspicuously parked, unmarked vehicle or by a technician standing on the side of the road. An effort was made to ensure tha t the presence of the vehicle or technician in no way affected the speed of the traf fic being surveyed. Field information from these speed surveys and other roadway characte ristics were recorded on field data forms and later coded into engineering software for analysis purposes. Chapter 2B of the 2014 California MUTCD indicates that it is desirable to have a minimum s ample of 100 vehicles for a speed zone survey for an arteria l street. This may result in excessive survey periods for low volume roadways, but a surve y should not contain less than 50 vehicles. In addition, average daily traffic volume s (ADT) and roadway widths were collected at all the locations.
Examples of the field data collected for the purpos es of analyzing related roadway characteristics as they pertain to the determinatio n of appropriate speed limits are listed below. The results of the field review for related roadway and traffic variables are summarized in the Engineering and Traffic Survey forms included in the Appendix C.
1. Segment length, width and alignment;
2. Level of pedestrian, bicycle, and truck activity
3. Traffic flow characteristics;
4. Number of lanes and other channelization/striping factors;
5. Frequency of intersections, driveways, on-street parking, bike lanes;
6. Locations of stop signs, traffic signals, and other regulatory traffic control devices;
7. Pavement condition;
8. Obstructions to driver/pedestrian visibility;
9. Land use and proximity of schools, parks/recreation areas and senior centers;
10. Uniformity with existing speed zones in adjacent jurisdictions; and,
11. Any other unusual conditions or hazards not readily apparent to the driver.
In addition to speed data collected by IDAX, field visit has been done by Kimley-Horn engineers at all forty-five locations to familiariz e with the exiting conditions and better judgment for speed recommendations.
2.2 Statistical Analysis Factors
Significant factors used to analyze the collected survey data are summarized below:
City of Marina 12
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
1. 85 th Percentile Speed . The Critical Speed, or the 85 th percentile speed, is defined as that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This factor is the primary guide in determining what spe eds the majority of safe and reasonable drivers are traveling. Therefore, the p ractice is to set the speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment from the critical sp eed unless other factors require a lower limit. Speed limits set on this bas is provide law enforcement officials with a means of controlling reckless or u nreliable drivers who will not conform to what the majority finds reasonable.
2. The 10-mph Pace. The 10-mph Pace is the 10-mph increment range, wh ich contains the largest number of recorded vehicles. The pace is a measure of the dispersion of speeds within the sample surveyed. Sp eed limits should normally be set to fall within the 10-mph pace. However, co nditions not readily apparent to the driver or adhering to State mandated limits s uch as in Residence Districts may require setting speed limits below the 10-mph pace.
3. 50
th Percentile Speed . The Median Speed, or 50 th Percentile Speed, represents the mid-point value within the range of recorded sp eeds for a particular roadway location. In other words, 50 percent of the vehicl es travel faster than and 50 percent travel slower than, the median speed. This value is another measure of the central tendency of the vehicle speed distribut ion. Typically speed limits should not be set below the 50 th Percentile Speed, since it would result in greater than 50-percent of the drivers exceeding the speed limit.
4. 15
th Percentile Speed . The 15 th Percentile Speed is that speed at or below which 15 percent of the vehicles are traveling. This val ue is important in determining the minimum allowable speed limit, given that the v ehicles traveling below this speed tend to obstruct the flow of traffic, thereby increasing the collision potential.
5. Percent of Vehicles in Pace Speed . The percent of vehicles in the 10-mph pace speed is an indication of the grouping of vehicular speeds. Ideally, if all vehicles were traveling at or about the same speed, there wo uld be a reduced likelihood of vehicular collisions. In speed limit analysis, the higher the percent of vehicles within the pace speed, the more favorable the speed distribution. The percent of the 10-mph pace is often between 60 and 90 percent.
City of Marina 13
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
2.3 2014 California MUTCD and CVC Guidance
Based on the 2014 California MUTCD , “When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 8 5 th -percentile speed of free-flowing traffic (CVC Section 22358.6(a)), except as shown in the two Options below for rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction (CVC Section 22 358.6(b)), or rounding up (CVC Section 22358.6(c)), or if using additional 5 mph sp eed reduction on local agency roadways for safety corridor designation (CVC Sectio n 22358.7(a)(1)) or adjacent to land or facility generating high concentrations of bicyc lists and pedestrians (CVC Section 22358.7(a)(2))”5.
Option:
1. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment o f the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed may be re duced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in co mpliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.
2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment o f the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.
Table 2B-104 (CA) in the MUTCD shows an example of rounding and additional speed reduction
6. In matching existing conditions with the traffic sa fety needs of the community, engineering judgment may indicate the need for a re duction of the posted speed limit by 5 mph due to specific factors such as road chara cteristics, the pace speed, roadside development and environment, pedestrian activity, a nd collision history. The following are some other factors to consider when establishin g speed limits between adjacent street segments:
1. Avoid Short Segments. Short speed zones of less than ½ mile should be avoided, except in transition areas.
2. Change in Roadway Conditions or Roadside Development. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadw ay conditions or roadside development.
5 California Department of Transportation, 2014 Cali fornia MUTCD, Chapter 2B, page 134, Revised January 6, 2023.
6 California Department of Transportation, 2014 Cali fornia MUTCD, Chapter 2B, page 259, Revised Februar y 6, 2023.
City of Marina 14
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
3. Minimize Change in Speed between Adjacent Segments. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban area s where 5 mph increments are preferable.
4. Coordinate Speed Zoning with Adjacent Jurisdictions.
Excerpts from the MUTCD are attached in the Appendix B.
2.4 Data Collection
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data and radar speed su rveys with calibrated radar gun were conducted by IDAX, during the month of December 202 4 at all forty-five (45) study segments. An effort was made to ensure that the ra dar speed data is collected without affecting the speed of the vehicles traveling along the study segments. The radar speed data was collected on a typical day with fair-weather conditions. Kimley-Horn conducted field visits along each study segments to gather ro adway characteristics, including but not limited to number of lanes in each direction, p resence of uncontrolled crosswalk, on-street parking, sidewalks, driveways, horizontal /vertical curves, adjacent land uses, etc.
The ADT data was used to determine the accident rat es and recommended speed limit for each study segments. Radar Speed Survey data and Average Daily Traffic (ADT) data is attached in Appendix D and Appendix F . The calibration certificate for the radar gun is attached in Appendix E.
2.5 Collision History
The Engineering and Traffic Survey forms summarize t he available collision information for each of the street segments. The collision inf ormation was obtained from the City from January 2019 to December 2021. The collisions were reviewed and corridor related collisions, those not related to signalized interse ctions, signs, or alcohol and drug influence, were summarized for each segment. Based on the number of total collisions studied over the 3-year period and ADT counts, a co llision rate per million vehicle miles was calculated for each segment. To provide a gene ral comparison of the collision rates on the segments to expected collisions rates for si milar types of local roadways, the collision rates for each segment were compared to t he statewide average rate listed in the 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, collisions, collision rates) as listed in Table 2 .
Table 2: 2022 California State Highways Collision Rates
City of Marina 15
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Lane Type Total Collision Rate Per Million Vehicle Miles (3-year rates for 2020, 2021, and 2022)
2&3 Lanes 1.07
4 lanes (undivided highway) 1.33
4 lanes (divided highway) 0.99
Because of the urban area of the City’s Street netwo rk, crash rates for Urban (Inside City) from the 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways was used.
The current collision rate for each segment was calculated using the formula below:
• N – Total number of collisions along the study segment • ADT – Average Daily Traffic along study segment
• L – Length of segment in miles
• Y – Number of years of collision data
The collision history for the Years 2020, 2021, and 2022 at the study segments is summarized in Error! Reference source not found. below:
City of Marina 16 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Table 3: Collision History Summary at Study Segments (2020-2022) # Street Name Limit 1 Limit 2 2020 2021 2022 2020, 2021, 2022 Collisions PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL 1 Imjin Parkway State Route 1 California Avenue 4 2 1 7 2 1 1 4 9 1 10 21 2 Imjin Parkway California Avenue Reservation Road 4 4 3 4 7 3 3 6 17 3 Del Monte Boulevard SR1/Reindollar Avenue Reservation Road 2 2 4 4 1 1 1 3 9 4 Del Monte Boulevard Reservation Road Beach Road 0 0 0 0 5 Del Monte Boulevard Beach Road Marina Greens Drive 0 0 0 0 6 Reservation Road Dunes Drive Beach Road 0 0 0 0 7 Reservation Road Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard 0 0 1 1 1 8 Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard Crescent Ave nue 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 6 9 Reservation Road Crescent Avenue California Avenue 0 0 0 0 10 Reservation Road California Avenue Salinas Avenu e 0 0 0 0 11 Reservation Road Salinas Avenue Imjin Parkway 0 0 5 5 5 12 Reservation Road Imjin Parkway Blanco Road 0 0 0 0 13 8th Street 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue 0 0 0 0 14 8th Street 5th Avenue Inter-Garrison Road 0 0 0 0 15 9th Street 1st Avenue 2nd Avenue 0 0 0 0 16 2nd Avenue Divarty Street 8th Street 0 0 1 1 1 17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 0 0 0 0 18 Beach Road Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard 0 0 1 1 1 19 De Forest Road Beach Road Reservation Road 0 0 0 0 20 Crescent Avenue Quebrada Del Mar Reservation Roa d 0 0 0 0 21 Crescent Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0 22 Cardoza Avenue Reservation Road Aaron Way (End) 0 0 0 0 23 Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard De Forest Road 0 0 0 0 24 California Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0 25 California Avenue Carmel Avenue Reindollar Avenue 0 0 0 0 26 California Avenue Reindollar Avenue Imjin Parkwa y 0 0 1 1 1 27 California Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0 0 0 0 28 Reindollar Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Avenue 0 0 0 0 29 Reindollar
Avenue/Bostick Avenue
California Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0
30 Carmel Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Ave nue 0 0 1 1 1 31 Carmel Avenue California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0 0 0 0 32 Salinas Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 0 0 0 0 33 Paul Davis Drive Healy Avenue Marina Greens Drive 0 0 0 0 34 Patton Parkway Marina High School California Ave nue 0 0 0 0 35 Crescent Avenue Patton Parkway Reindollar Avenue 0 0 0 0 36 Vaughan Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0 37 Seacrest Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 0 0 1 1 1 38 Sunset Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 0 0 0
City of Marina 17 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
# Street Name Limit 1 Limit 2 2020 2021 2022 2020, 2021, 2022 Collisions PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL PDO COP VIS SEV FAT TOTAL 39 Lake Drive Palm Avenue Reservation Road 0 0 0 0 40 Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte Boulevard 0 0 0 0 41 Abrams Drive Preston Drive Imjin Parkway 0 0 0 0 42 Preston Drive Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway 0 0 0 0 43 3rd Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0 0 0 0 44 Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway (West) Preston Drive 0 0 0 0 45 Marina Heights Drive California Avenue Imjin Parkway 0 0 0 0 Notes:
PDO - Property Damage Only, COP - Complaint of Pain, VIS - Visible Injury, SEV - Severe Injury, FAT – Fatal
City of Marina 18 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Table 4: Collision Rate Summary at Study Segments
#
Street Name
Segment 2019, 2020, 2021
Collisions
ADT/Avg
ADT
Distance (Ft) Distance (Mi) Segment CR Expected CR Segment CR > Expected CR?
Limit 1
Limit 2
1 Imjin Parkway State Route 1 California Avenue 21 25,688 4,752 0.9 0.83 0.99 No 2 Imjin Parkway California Avenue Reservation Road 17 20,534 10,560 2.00 0.44 1.07 No 3 Del Monte Boulevard SR1/Reindollar Avenue Reservation Road 9 22,304 4,752 0.9 0.41 0.99 No 4 Del Monte Boulevard Reservation Road Beach Road 0 9,121 2,640 0.5 0.00 0.99 No 5 Del Monte Boulevard Beach Road Marina Greens Drive 0 5,302 2,640 0.5 0.00 1.07 No 6 Reservation Road Dunes Drive Beach Road 0 7,348 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 7 Reservation Road Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard 1 6,596 3,168 0.6 0.46 1.07 No 8 Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard Crescent Ave nue 6 18,593 2,640 0.5 0.69 0.99 No 9 Reservation Road Crescent Avenue California Avenue 0 17,187 2,640 0.5 0.21 0.99 No 10 Reservation Road California Avenue Salinas Aven ue 0 14,699 2,112 0.4 0.00 0.99 No 11 Reservation Road Salinas Avenue Imjin Parkway 5 16,027 4,224 0.8 0.50 1.33 No 12 Reservation Road Imjin Parkway Blanco Road 0 30,285 3,696 0.7 0.39 0.99 No 13 8th Street 2nd Avenue 3rd Avenue 0 1,037 1,056 0.2 0.00 1.07 No 14 8th Street 5th Avenue Inter-Garrison Road 0 4,2 95 3,168 0.6 0.00 1.07 No 15 9th Street 1st Avenue 2nd Avenue 0 2,528 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 16 2nd Avenue Divarty Street 8th Street 1 7,573 3, 168 0.6 0.20 1.07 No 17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 0 8,306 2,112 0.4 0.27 1.07 No 18 Beach Road Reservation Road Del Monte Boulevard 1 6,012 1,584 0.3 2.03 1.07 Yes 19 De Forest Road Beach Road Reservation Road 0 1,749 2,640 0.5 2.09 1.07 Yes 20 Crescent Avenue Quebrada Del Mar Reservation Roa d 0 1,353 2,112 0.4 0.00 1.07 No 21 Crescent Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 0 3,528 1,584 0.3 0.86 1.07 No 22 Cardoza Avenue Reservation Road Aaron Way (End) 0 2,458 2,640 0.5 0.00 1.07 No 23 Beach Road Del Monte Boulevard De Forest Road 0 2,598 2,640 0.5 0.00 1.07 No 24 California Avenue Reservation Road Carmel Avenue 0 5,842 1,584 0.3 0.52 1.07 No 25 California Avenue Carmel Avenue Reindollar Avenue 0 6,430 1,056 0.2 0.00 1.07 No 26 California Avenue Reindollar Avenue Imjin Parkw ay 1 8,725 3,696 0.7 0.30 1.07 No 27 California Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0 851 2,640 0.5 0.00 1.07 No 28 Reindollar Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Avenue 0 3,372 5,280 1.0 0.00 1.07 No 29 Reindollar Avenue/Bostick Avenue California Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 1,690 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 30 Carmel Avenue Del Monte Boulevard California Avenue 1 3,704 7,392 1.4 0.70 1.07 No 31 Carmel Avenue California Avenue Salinas Avenue 0 812 2,112 0.4 0.00 1.07 No 32 Salinas Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 0 264 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 33 Paul Davis Drive Healy Avenue Marina Greens Drive 0 657 1,056 0.2 0.00 1.07 No 34 Patton Parkway Marina High School California Ave nue 0 661 3,168 0.6 2.30 1.07 Yes 35 Crescent Avenue Patton Parkway Reindollar Avenue 0 1,304 528 0.1 0.00 1.07 No 36 Vaughan Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 1,515 1,584 0.3 0.00 1.07 No 37 Seacrest Avenue Carmel Avenue Reservation Road 1 3,992 1,584 0.3 1.53 1.07 Yes 38 Sunset Avenue Reindollar Avenue Carmel Avenue 0 2,854 528 0.1 0.00 1.07 No 39 Lake Drive Palm Avenue Reservation Road 0 1,521 2,112 0.4 1.50 1.07 Yes
City of Marina 19 May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment 2019, 2020, 2021
Collisions
ADT/Avg
ADT
Distance (Ft) Distance (Mi) Segment CR Expected CR Segment CR > Expected CR?
Limit 1
Limit 2
40 Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte Boulevard 0 2, 878 1,056 0.2 0.00 1.07 No 41 Abrams Drive Preston Drive Imjin Parkway 0 2,360 1,056 0.2 1.93 1.07 Yes 42 Preston Drive Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway 0 2,110 3,168 0.6 0.00 1.07 No 43 3rd Avenue Imjin Parkway 8th Street 0 981 2,112 0.4 0.00 1.07 No 44 Abrams Drive Imjin Parkway (West) Preston Drive 0 2,667 5,808 1.1 0.00 1.07 No 45 Marina Heights Drive California Avenue Imjin Parkway 0 2,407 5,808 1.1 0.00 1.07 No
City of Marina 20
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
3.0 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations contained in this report are in tended to establish prima facie speed limits. Prima facie limits attempt to advise the motorist and enforcement of the reasonable speed for a particular section of roadwa y for the prevailing conditions. In many cases, the recommendations made produce a uniform speed limit along the road.
The Engineering and Traffic Survey (ET&S) forms, presented in the Appendix C, illustrate the results of a thorough evaluation of the availab le data and indicate a recommended speed limit for each of the street segments surveye d. A summary of the data analysis, along with recommended speed limits can be found in . The recommended speed limit for each segment is shown in Figure 1 .
City of Marina 21 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Table 5: Speed Survey Recommendations
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
1 Imjin Parkway State
Route 1 California Avenue 50 50 0.83 0.99 No Yes 45 -5
Imjin Parkway is classified as a 4-lane Expressway with divided median and is a major travel route in and out of the City carrying significant traffic volumes. Even though a total of 21 collisions were reported (2020-2022), the collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. The 85th percentile speed of 50 mph observed is equal to the existing posted speed limit.
With one fatal and one serious injury crash involving pedestrian/bicyclists, the crash density is higher than other segments. The segment meets the definition of safety corridor and the 85th percentile speed can be further lowered by 5 mph to 45 mph.
2 Imjin Parkway California
Avenue Reservation Road 25 39.15 0.44 1.07 No No N/A (See Note 1)
Imjin Parkway is classified as a 4 -lane Expressway and is a major travel route in and out of the City carrying significant traffic volumes. Even though a total of 20 collisions were reported (2020-2022), the collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
3 Del Monte
Boulevard
SR1/Reind
ollar
Avenue
Reservation Road 40 45.10 0.41 0.99 No Yes 35 -5
Del Monte Boulevard between SR1/Reindollar Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45 mph.
The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class I bike route, residential/commercial land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed to 40 mph, if no further reductions are used.
Additionally, the segment meets the Safety Corridor requirements related to crash density, school proximity, downtown core, vulnerable population, and crash severity. Therefore it is recommended that the resulting 85 th percentile speed is further reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph.
4 Del Monte
Boulevard
Reservatio
n Road Beach Road 40 42 0.00 0.99 No No 35 -5
Del Monte Boulevard between Reservation Road and Beach Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 42 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class I bike route, residential/commercial land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile
City of Marina 22 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
5 Del Monte
Boulevard
Beach
Road
Marina Greens
Drive 40 45.15 0.00 1.07 No No 40
Del Monte Boulevard between Beach Road and Marina Greens Drive is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking , bike route, and multiple driveways justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
6 Reservation
Road
Dunes
Drive Beach Road 35 34 0.00 1.07 No No 35
Reservation Road between Dunes Drive and Beach Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, and vertical/horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 7 Reservation
Road
Beach
Road
Del Monte
Boulevard 30 33.15 0.46 1.07 No No 30
Reservation Road between Beach Road and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 33.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision
City of Marina 23 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II bike lanes, uncontrolled crosswalks, driveways, and horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 8 Reservation
Road
Del Monte
Boulevard Crescent Avenue 35 39 0.69 0.99 No No 35
Reservation Road between Del Monte Boulevard and Crescent Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 39 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II bike lanes, on-street parking, driveways, and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 9 Reservation
Road
Crescent
Avenue California Avenue 40 43 0.21 0.99 No No 40
Reservation Road between Crescent Avenue and California Avenue is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 43 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II bike lanes, on-street parking, driveways, and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 10 Reservation
Road
California
Avenue Salinas Avenue 45 51 0.00 0.99 No No 45
Reservation Road between California Avenue and Salinas Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 51 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 50 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected
City of Marina 24 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, Two-Way Left Turn (TWLT) lane, multiple driveways, and horizontal/vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
11 Reservation
Road
Salinas
Avenue Imjin Parkway 55 57 0.50 1.33 No No 55
Reservation Road between Salinas Avenue and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 55 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 57 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 55 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
To maintain the street characteristics, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limit is retained. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 55 mph is retained.
12 Reservation
Road
Imjin
Parkway Blanco Road 55 60.15 0.39 0.99 No No 55
Reservation Road between Imjin Parkway and and Blanco Road is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 55 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 60.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 60 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 55 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
13 8th Street 2nd
Avenue 3rd Avenue 25 32.60 0.00 1.07 No No 25
8th Street between 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32.6 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar
City of Marina 25 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II bike lane and surrounding residential land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
14 8th Street 5th
Avenue
Inter-Garrison
Road 40 41 0.00 1.07 No No 35 -5
8th Street between 5th Avenue and Inter-Garrison Road is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 41 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of driveways, limited visibility, and horizontal curve further justify reducing the resulting 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
15 9th Street 1st
Avenue 2nd Avenue 30 31 0.00 1.07 No No 25 -5
9th Street between 1st Avenue and 2nd Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, uncontrolled crosswalk, nature of surrounding land uses, and horizontal curve further justify reducing the resulting 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
16 2nd Avenue Divarty
Street 8th Street 45 46 0.20 1.07 No No 40 -5 2nd Avenue between Divarty Street and 8th Street is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The radar speed data
City of Marina 26 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 46 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
2nd Avenue from 8 th Avenue to Imjin Parkway, has a posted speed limit of 35 mph.
It is recommended that adjacent sections of a corridor do not have a posted speed limit difference of more than 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the resulting 85th percentile speed is further reduced.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
17 2nd Avenue 8th Street Imjin Parkway 35 36 0.27 1.07 No No 35 2nd Avenue between 8th Street and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph is retained.
18 Beach Road Reservatio
n Road
Del Monte
Boulevard 35 35 2.03 1.07 Yes No 30 -5
Beach Road between Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
Higher collision rate than statewide average (involving 1 severe injury), presence on uncontrolled crosswalks, horizontal/vertical curves, and merge/diverge lanes justify further reduction in the resulting 85 th percentile speed limit . Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th
City of Marina 27 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph is reduced to 30 mph. 19 De Forest
Road
Beach
Road Reservation Road 30 36 2.09 1.07 Yes No 30
Del Forest Road between Beach Road and Reservation Road is classified as a collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph with a 10-mph pace range of 29 mph to 38 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of uncontrolled crosswalk, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
20 Crescent
Avenue
Quebrada
Del Mar Reservation Road 25 32 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Crescent Avenue between Quebrada Del Mar and Reservation Road is classified as a collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
21 Crescent
Avenue
Reservatio
n Road Carmel Avenue 30 36 0.86 1.07 No No 30
Crescent Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue is classified as a collector per the General Plan. There speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
City of Marina 28 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
22 Cardoza
Avenue
Reservatio
n Road Aaron Way (End) 30 35 0.00 1.07 No No 30
Cardoza Avenue between Reservation Road and Aaron Way is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
23 Beach Road Del Monte
Boulevard De Forest Road 30 28 0.00 1.07 No No 25 -5
Beach Road between Del Monte Boulevard and De Forest Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of elementary school, multiple driveways, and horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 24 California
Avenue
Reservatio
n Road Carmel Avenue 30 37 0.52 1.07 No No 30
California Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 37 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
City of Marina 29 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
25 California
Avenue
Carmel
Avenue
Reindollar
Avenue 25 32 0.00 1.07 No No 30 5
California Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reindollar Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
California Avenue is classified as a Collector Street under the General Plan. The primary purpose of Collector streets is to collect traffic from residential streets and link to higher classification streets such as Arterials. They are intended to move the traffic in an efficient manner. To maintain the street characteristics and to be consistent with speed limit recommended for adjacent Segment # 24 (California Avenue – from Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue), it is recommended that the speed limit is increased to 30 mph.
26 California
Avenue
Reindollar
Avenue Imjin Parkway 40 45 0.30 1.07 No No 40
California Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II Bike Lanes, horizontal and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph is retained.
27 California
Avenue
Imjin
Parkway 8th Street 30 28 0.00 1.07 No No 30
California Avenue between Imjin Parkway and 8th Street is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
City of Marina 30 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
28 Reindollar
Avenue
Del Monte
Boulevard California Avenue 25 34 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Reindollar Avenue between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph.
The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
29 Reindollar
Avenue/Bostic
k Avenue
California
Avenue Carmel Avenue 30 33 0.00 1.07 No No 25 -5
Reindollar Avenue between California Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 33 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, uncontrolled crosswalks, and residential land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 30 Carmel
Avenue
Del Monte
Boulevard California Avenue 25 31 0.70 1.07 No No 25
Carmel Avenue between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
City of Marina 31 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical curve, uncontrolled crosswalks, and residential land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
31 Carmel
Avenue
California
Avenue Salinas Avenue 25 29 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Carmel Avenue between California Avenue and Salinas Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, uncontrolled crosswalk, and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 32 Salinas
Avenue
Carmel
Avenue Reservation Road 25 24 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Salinas Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 24 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
33 Paul Davis
Drive
Healy
Avenue
Marina Greens
Drive 30 25 0.00 1.07 No No 25 -5
Paul Davis Drive between Healy Avenue and Marina Greens Drive is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 25 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar
City of Marina 32 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
facilities statewide.
Presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, and horizontal curves justifies lowering the speed limit. It is recommended that the observed 85 th percentile speed limit of 25 mph is adopted for this segment.
34 Patton
Parkway
Marina
High
School
California Avenue 40 41 2.30 1.07 Yes No 35 -5
Patton Parkway between Marina High School and California Avenue is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 41 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph.
The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. The presence of bike routes, horizontal/vertical curves, and residential/school land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
35 Crescent
Avenue
Patton
Parkway
Reindollar
Avenue 25 30 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Crescent Street between Patton Parkway and Reindollar Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 30 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, horizontal and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 36 Vaughan
Avenue
Reindollar
Avenue Carmel Avenue 25 29 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Vaughan Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, and vertical curve justify
City of Marina 33 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 37 Seacrest
Avenue
Carmel
Avenue Reservation Road 30 31.15 1.53 1.07 Yes No 30
Seacrest Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, and residential/commercial land uses justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained. 38 Sunset
Avenue
Reindollar
Avenue Carmel Avenue 25 31 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Sunset Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, and residential/commercial land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
39 Lake Drive Palm
Avenue Reservation Road 25 36 1.50 1.07 Yes No 25
Lake Drive between Palm Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph.
Higher than the expected collision rate, presence of on-street parking, driveways
City of Marina 34 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
and surrounding residential land uses justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
40 Palm Avenue Lake Drive Del Monte
Boulevard 25 28 0.00 1.07 No No 25
Palm Avenue between Lake Drive and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical curve, and residential land uses justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 41 Abrams Drive Preston
Drive Imjin Parkway 30 34 1.93 1.07 Yes No 30
Abrams Drive between Preston Drive and Imjin Parkway is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph..
Higher than the expected collision rate, presence of horizontal and vertical curve, and residential land uses justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85 th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. 42 Preston Drive Abrams
Drive Imjin Parkway 30 29.15 0.00 1.07 No No 30
Preston Drive between Abrams Drive and Imjin Parkway is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
City of Marina 35 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Presence of driveways, park, residential land uses, horizontal and vertical curves further justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
43 3rd Avenue Imjin
Parkway 8th Street 25 27 0.00 1.07 No No 25
3rd Avenue between Imjin Parkway and 8th Street is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 27 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free- flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph.
The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, residential and commercial land uses further justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
44 Abrams Drive
Imjin
Parkway
(West)
Preston Drive 25 35.15 0.00 1.07 No No 30 5
Abrams Drive between Imjin Parkway and Preston Drive is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
Abrams Drive is classified as Collector Street per the City’s General Plan. The primary purpose of Collector streets is to collect traffic from residential streets and link to higher classification streets such as Arterials. They are intended to move the traffic in an efficient manner. To maintain the street characteristics and to be consistent with speed limit recommended for adjacent Segment # 41 (Abrams Drive – from Preston to Imjin Parkway), it is recommended that the speed limit is increased to 30 mph.
45 Marina
Heights Drive
California
Avenue Imjin Parkway 25 34 0.00 1.07 No No 30 5
Marina Heights Drive between California Avenue and Imjin Pakrway is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the
City of Marina 36 May 202 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
#
Street Name
Segment
Expected
Collision Rate
(CR)
Segment CR >
Expected CR
Safety
Corridor Or
Area of High
Concentration
of Bicyclists
or Pedestrians
Draft
Recommend
ed Speed
Limit (MPH)
Change Speed
Limit (MPH) Justifications
Limit 1
Limit 2
Posted Speed
Limit (MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
Segment
Collision Rate
(CR)
85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
Abrams Drive is classified as Collector Street per the City’s General Plan. The primary purpose of Collector streets is to collect traffic from residential streets and link to higher classification streets such as Arterials. They are intended to move the traffic in an efficient manner. To maintain the street characteristics and to be consistent with speed limit recommended for adjacent Segment # 41 (Abrams Drive – from Preston to Imjin Parkway), it is recommended that the speed limit is increased to 30 mph.
Notes:
1. None. Imjin Parkway from California Avenue to Reservation Road is currently under construction.
City of Marina 37 May 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Figure 2: City of Marina Recommended Speed Limits
City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Appendix A
California Vehicle Code (CVC) - Applicable Sections
Cal. Veh. Code § 627
Section 627 - "Engineering and traffic survey" defined
(a)"Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway andtraffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department ofTransportation for use by state and local authorities.(b)An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemednecessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:(1)Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2)Accident records.
(3)Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c)When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to thefactors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of thefollowing:(1)Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion ofhighway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:(A)Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, thecontiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwellinghouses or business structures. (B)Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile,the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwellinghouses or business structures. (C)The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio ofseparate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described ineither subparagraph (A) or (B). (2)Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerablepedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personalassistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
Ca. Veh. Code § 627
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 1, eff. 1/1/2022.Amended by Stats 2000 ch 45 (AB 2767), s 1, eff. 1/1/2001. 1 Cal. Veh. Code § 21400
Section 21400 - Uniform standards and specifications for official traffic control devices (a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies andpublic hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards andspecifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including,but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroadwarning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stockcrossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine andpublicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to beplaced upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with orendangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway.(c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placedupon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway.(d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984,shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.
Ca. Veh. Code § 21400
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 2, eff. 1/1/2022.Amended by Stats 2011 ch 528 (AB 529),s 2, eff. 1/1/2012. 1 Cal. Veh. Code § 22352
Section 22352 - Prima facie limits
(a)Fifteen miles per hour:(1)When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach tothe crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and ofany traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway.This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a humanflagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signaldevice is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train orcar. (2)When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver'sapproach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of theintersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for adistance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stopsigns or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3)On any alley.
(b)Twenty-five miles per hour:(1)On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed isdetermined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures setforth in this code. (2)When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to ahighway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going toor leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. Theprima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds whichare not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while thegrounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL"warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs maybe placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (3)When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens,contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR"warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the localagency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A localauthority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant toChapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and HighwaysCode, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized inthis code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
1 erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for theerection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
Ca. Veh. Code § 22352
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 3, eff. 1/1/2022.Amended by Stats 2015 ch 12 (AB 95),s 15, eff. 6/24/2015.Amended by Stats 2013 ch 240 (AB 707),s 1, eff. 1/1/2013. 2 Section 22352 - Prima facie limits Cal. Veh. Code § 22352 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.6
Section 22358.6 - Rounding speed limits in relation to free-flowing traffic (a)The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise andthereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require theDepartment of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest fivemiles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic.(b)In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles perhour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a localauthority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile perhour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30,2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and trafficsurvey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take intoconsideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable.(c)In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles perhour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a localauthority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hourincrement. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limitshall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b).(d)In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speedlimit as provided in Section 22358.7.(e)The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shallnot exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed.(f)Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain thecurrently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, orrestore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 withoutfurther reduction.
Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.6
Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 2, eff. 1/1/2023.Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 6, eff. 1/1/2022. 1 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.7
Section 22358.7 - Reducing speed limits
(a)If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that thespeed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance,determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional fivemiles per hour for either of the following reasons:(1)The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shallnot deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2)The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates highconcentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups suchas children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (b)(1)As used in this section, "safety corridor" shall be defined by the Department ofTransportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic ControlDevices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that havethe highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may bederived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. (2)The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manualon Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities thatgenerate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) ofsubdivision (a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, roaduse type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c)A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30,2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infractionviolations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner.(d)A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speedlimit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect asauthorized by this section.
Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.7
Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 7, eff. 1/1/2022.
1 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.8
Section 22358.8 - Retaining or restoring speed limit
(a)If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that thespeed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance,retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limitif that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registeredengineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional generalpurpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey thatestablished that speed limit.(b)This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five milesper hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speedlimit.(c)A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speedlimit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect asauthorized by this section.
Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.8
Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 3, eff. 1/1/2023.Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 8, eff. 1/1/2022. 1 Cal. Veh. Code § 627
Section 627 - "Engineering and traffic survey" defined
(a)"Engineering and traffic survey," as used in this code, means a survey of highway andtraffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department ofTransportation for use by state and local authorities.(b)An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemednecessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:(1)Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2)Accident records.
(3)Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver. (c)When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to thefactors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of thefollowing:(1)Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion ofhighway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:(A)Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, thecontiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwellinghouses or business structures. (B)Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile,the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwellinghouses or business structures. (C)The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio ofseparate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described ineither subparagraph (A) or (B). (2)Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerablepedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personalassistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.
Ca. Veh. Code § 627
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 1, eff. 1/1/2022.Amended by Stats 2000 ch 45 (AB 2767), s 1, eff. 1/1/2001. 1 Cal. Veh. Code § 21400
Section 21400 - Uniform standards and specifications for official traffic control devices (a) The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies andpublic hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards andspecifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including,but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroadwarning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stockcrossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.(b) The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine andpublicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to beplaced upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with orendangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway.(c) Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placedupon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway.(d) Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984,shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.
Ca. Veh. Code § 21400
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 2, eff. 1/1/2022.Amended by Stats 2011 ch 528 (AB 529),s 2, eff. 1/1/2012. 1 Cal. Veh. Code § 22352
Section 22352 - Prima facie limits
(a)Fifteen miles per hour:(1)When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach tothe crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and ofany traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway.This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a humanflagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signaldevice is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train orcar. (2)When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver'sapproach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of theintersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for adistance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stopsigns or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3)On any alley.
(b)Twenty-five miles per hour:(1)On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed isdetermined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures setforth in this code. (2)When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to ahighway and posted with a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while children are going toor leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. Theprima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds whichare not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while thegrounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard "SCHOOL"warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard "SCHOOL" warning signs maybe placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds. (3)When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens,contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard "SENIOR"warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the localagency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A localauthority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant toChapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and HighwaysCode, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized inthis code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
1 erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for theerection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.
Ca. Veh. Code § 22352
Amended by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 3, eff. 1/1/2022.Amended by Stats 2015 ch 12 (AB 95),s 15, eff. 6/24/2015.Amended by Stats 2013 ch 240 (AB 707),s 1, eff. 1/1/2013. 2 Section 22352 - Prima facie limits Cal. Veh. Code § 22352 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.6
Section 22358.6 - Rounding speed limits in relation to free-flowing traffic (a)The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise andthereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require theDepartment of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest fivemiles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic.(b)In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded down to the nearest five miles perhour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a localauthority may lower the speed limit by five miles per hour from the nearest five mile perhour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with Sections 627 and 22358.5and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as it read on March 30,2021, if the reasons for the lower speed limit are documented in an engineering and trafficsurvey. The Department of Transportation or a local authority may also take intoconsideration Sections 22353, 22353.2, 22353.3, 22353.4, and 22353.5, if applicable.(c)In cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles perhour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a localauthority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hourincrement. If the speed limit is rounded down pursuant to this subdivision, the speed limitshall not be reduced any further pursuant to subdivision (b).(d)In addition to subdivisions (b) and (c), a local authority may additionally lower the speedlimit as provided in Section 22358.7.(e)The total reduction in the speed limit pursuant to subdivisions (a) to (d), inclusive, shallnot exceed 12.4 miles per hour from the 85th percentile speed.(f)Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (e), inclusive, a local authority may retain thecurrently adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 without further reduction, orrestore the immediately prior adopted speed limit as provided in Section 22358.8 withoutfurther reduction.
Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.6
Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 2, eff. 1/1/2023.Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 6, eff. 1/1/2022. 1 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.7
Section 22358.7 - Reducing speed limits
(a)If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that thespeed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance,determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional fivemiles per hour for either of the following reasons:(1)The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shallnot deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors. (2)The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates highconcentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups suchas children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused. (b)(1)As used in this section, "safety corridor" shall be defined by the Department ofTransportation in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic ControlDevices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that havethe highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may bederived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. (2)The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manualon Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities thatgenerate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) ofsubdivision (a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, roaduse type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c)A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30,2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infractionviolations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner.(d)A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speedlimit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect asauthorized by this section.
Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.7
Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 7, eff. 1/1/2022.
1 Cal. Veh. Code § 22358.8
Section 22358.8 - Retaining or restoring speed limit
(a)If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that thespeed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance,retain the currently adopted speed limit or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limitif that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registeredengineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional generalpurpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey thatestablished that speed limit.(b)This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five milesper hour from the currently adopted speed limit nor below the immediately prior speedlimit.(c)A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speedlimit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect asauthorized by this section.
Ca. Veh. Code § 22358.8
Amended by Stats 2022 ch 406 (AB 1938),s 3, eff. 1/1/2023.Added by Stats 2021 ch 690 (AB 43),s 8, eff. 1/1/2022. 1 City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Appendix B
Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) –
Applicable Sections
City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Appendix C
Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms
STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 450 ft West of Imjin Pkwy and 3rd Ave Posted Speed Limit 50 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:22 AM - 12:00 PM Recommended Speed Limit45 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)46.5 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH85th Percentile Speed 50 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 42 - 51 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 21
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.83
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 25,688 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 4th Ave, 3rd Ave, and State Route Ramps Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.9 mi
Width 70 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Expressway
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Public facilities, Commercial, and Residental
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Imjin Parkway is classified as a 4-lane Expressway with divided median and is a major travel route in and out of the City carrying significant traffic volumes. Even though a total of 21 collisions were reported (2020-2022), the collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. The 85th percentile speed of 50 mph observed is equal to the existing posted speed limit.
With one fatal and one serious injury crash involving pedestrian/bicyclists, the crash density is higher than other segments. The segment meets the definition of safety corridor and the 85th percentile speed can be further lowered by 5 mph to 45 mph.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Imjin Parkway
State Route 1
1 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Reservation Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 200 ft West of Imjin Pkwy and Abrams Dr Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:27 AM - 11:53 AM Recommended Speed Limit NA 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36.5 MPH Speed Limit Change NA 85th Percentile Speed 39 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 32 - 41 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 92.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 20
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.44
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 20,534
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Abrams Dr and 3rd Ave Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 2 mi
Width 52 - 72 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1 Imjin Rd to California Ave EB - 2 WB-2 Street Classification 4-Lane Expressway
Divided Median? No There is a median between Imjin Rd and California Ave Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Unidentified - under construction
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes - Slight
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Mostly Parks and Open Space, Public facilities and Commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Imjin Parkway is classified as a 4-lane Expressway and is a major travel route in and out of the City carrying significant traffic volumes. Even though a total of 20 collisions were reported (2020-2022), the collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. Imjin Parkway from California Avenue to Reservation Road is currently under construction.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Imjin Parkway
California Ave
2 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Reservation Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 105 ft south of Del Monte Blvd and Cypress AvePosted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:23 AM - 9:46 AM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)40.5 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 45 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 36 - 45 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 9
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.41
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 22,304 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Cypress Ave, Carmel Ave, and Mortimer Ln Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.9 mi
Width 88 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-2 SB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? Yes (Class I)
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes - Slight
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential and Public facilities
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Del Monte Boulevard between SR1/Reindollar Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class I bike route, residential/commercial land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, if no further reductions are used.
Additionally, the segment meets the Safety Corridor requirements related to crash density, school proximity, downtown core, vulnerable population, and crash severity. Therefore it is recommended that the resulting 85th percentile speed is further reduced by 5 mph to 35 mph.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Del Monte Boulevard
SR1/Reindollar Ave
3 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Beach Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 0.2 mile south of Del Monte Rd and Beach RdPosted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:35 AM - 9:50 AM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)39 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 42 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 35 - 44 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 9,121 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Beach Rd
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 64 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-2 SB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Public facilities and Parks and open spaces
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Del Monte Boulevard between Reservation Road and Beach Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 42 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class I bike route, residential/commercial land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Del Monte Boulevard
Reservation Road
4 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Marina Greens Drive
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 240 ft south of Cosky Dr Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:05 AM - 9:30 AM Recommended Speed Limit 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)41 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 45.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 36 - 45 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5,302 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Beach Rd, stop controlled at Marina Green Dr, Cosky Dr, and Cypress Knolls Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 60 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? Yes - On west side
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Industrial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Del Monte Boulevard between Beach Road and Marina Greens Drive is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking , bike route, and multiple driveways justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Del Monte Boulevard
Beach Road
5 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Beach Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 120 ft west of Cardoza Ave Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:27 AM - 2:50 AM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 34 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7,348 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Dunes Dr, Hwy 1 off -ramp and on-ramp Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 43-69 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1 EB-2 and WB-2 at Cardoza Ave
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes (One-side from Dunes Dr to Off-Ramp) Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Dunes Drive and Beach Road is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, and vertical/horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Dunes Drive
6 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Del Monte Boulevard
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 410 ft north of Seaside Cir & Seaside Ct Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:52 PM - 3:05 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29.5 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 33.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 26 - 35 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 2
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.46
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 6,596 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Seaside Cir and Robin Dr Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 80 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes at roundabouts
On-Street Parking? No (Only one-side right before Del Monte Blvd) Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Parks and open spaces
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Beach Road and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 33.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II bike lanes, uncontrolled crosswalks, driveways, and horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Beach Road
7 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/18/2024
FROM: TO: Crescent Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Eucalyptus St Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:52 AM - 12:40 PM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)35 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 39 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 32 - 41 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 89.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 7
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.69
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 18,593 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Eucalyptus St Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 92 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes (right before Crescent Avenue and few other segments) Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial and Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Del Monte Boulevard and Crescent Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 39 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II bike lanes, on-street parking, driveways, and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Del Monte Boulevard
8 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/18/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 290 ft east of Crescent Ave Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:15 AM - 11:48 AM Recommended Speed Limit 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)39 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 43 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 35 - 44 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 90.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 17,187 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Crestview Ct and Ocean Terrace Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 89 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes - TWLT Before California Ave
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes (2 Hr Parking)
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential, Parks and open spaces
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Crescent Avenue and California Avenue is classified as an Arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 43 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II bike lanes, on-street parking, driveways, and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Crescent Avenue
9 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Salinas Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Lynscott Dr Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH Time of Speed Survey 1:28 PM - 1:57 PM Recommended Speed Limit 45 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)46 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 51 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 41 - 50 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 14,699 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Lynscott Dr, Bayer St, and Salinas Ave Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 88 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes - TWLT
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II ends at Salinas Ave)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Commercial and Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between California Avenue and Salinas Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 51 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 50 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking , Class II bike lanes, Two-Way Left Turn (TWLT) lane, multiple driveways, and horizontal/vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
California Avenue
10 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 640 ft west of Imjin Rd and Imjin Pkwy Posted Speed Limit 55 MPH Time of Speed Survey 1:02 PM - 1:26 PM Recommended Speed Limit 55 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)50 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 57 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 46 - 55 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 5
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.36
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.33
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 16,027 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Salinas Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.8 mi
Width 63 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-2 WB-2
Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? Yes (One-side and starts at Salinas Ave) Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? No
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes - Slight
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Public facilitites, Parks and open spaces
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Salinas Avenue and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 55 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 57 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 55 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
To maintain the street characteristics, it is recommended that the existing posted speed limit is retained. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 55 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Salinas Avenue
11 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Blanco Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 975 ft east of Imjin Pkwy Posted Speed Limit 55 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:39 PM - 12:58 PM Recommended Speed Limit 55 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)55 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 60.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 50 - 59 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 9
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.39
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 0.99
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 30,285 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control All Signalized
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.7 mi
Width 94 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-3 WB-3 2 lanes from Imjin to Blanco and 3 lanes from Blanco to Imjin Pkwy Street Classification 4-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (From Mbest Dr to Imjin Pkwy and from Imjin Pkwy to Blanco Rd) Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? No
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Commercial, Parks and open spaces
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reservation Road between Imjin Parkway and and Blanco Road is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 55 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 60.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 60 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 55 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reservation Road
Imjin Parkway
12 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/19/2024
FROM: TO: 3rd Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Bluewater Ct Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:18 AM - 11:18 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)28 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 32.6 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 24 - 33 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 94.7%
Number of Survey Samples 57
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,037 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 2nd Ave, Bluewater Ct, Lighthouse Ln, Sandy Clay Ln, and 3rd Ave Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 48 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition New
Adjacent Land Use Residential and public facilities
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
8th Street between 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph.
The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32.6 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II bike lane and surrounding residential land uses, multiple driveways and vertical curve justify reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
8th Street
2nd Avenue
13 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: Inter-Garrison Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 0.1 mile west of Inter-Garrison Rd Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:50 PM - 3:52 PM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPG 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)36 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH85th Percentile Speed 41 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 30 - 39 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 4,295 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 5th St, Imjin Rd, Engineering Equipment Rd, and Inter-Garrison Rd Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 31 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? No
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Limited along certain sections
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Public facilities and Commerical
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
8th Street between 5th Avenue and Inter-Garrison Road is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph.
The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 41 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of driveways, limited visibility, and horizontal curve further justify reducing the resulting 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
8th Street
5th Avenue
14 STREET: SURVEY DATE: #######
FROM: TO: 2nd Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 380 ft west of 2nd Ave Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:04 PM - 12:41 PM Recommended Speed Limit25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH85th Percentile Speed 31 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 22 - 31 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 95.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,528 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 1st Ave and 2nd Ave and a Roundabout Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 41 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?At Roundabout
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Hospital, public facilities and open spaces
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
9th Street between 1st Avenue and 2nd Avenue is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, uncontrolled crosswalk, nature of surrounding land uses, and horizontal curve further justify reducing the resulting 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
9th Street
1st Avenue
15 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: 8th Street
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At 5th Street Posted Speed Limit 45 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM - 9:42 AM Recommended Speed Limit 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)42 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 46 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 38 - 47 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 94.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.20
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 7,573 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at 8th street, 6th street, 5th street, Inter-Garrison Rd, and Divarty Street Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 64 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? Yes
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes - Not Connected
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Public facilities, and Open spaces
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
2nd Avenue between Divarty Street and 8th Street is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 45 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 46 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. 2nd Avenue from 8th Avenue to Imjin Parkway, has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. It is recommended that adjacent sections of a corridor do not have a posted speed limit difference of more than 5 mph. Therefore, it is recommended that the resulting 85th percentile speed is further reduced.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2nd Avenue
Divarty Street
16 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 305 ft north of 9th Street Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:45 AM - 10:26 AM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 29 - 38 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 95.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8,306 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Jetty Street, 10th Street, 9th Street , and 8th Street Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 64 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-2 SB-2 NB-1 and SB-1 after General Stilwell Drive Street Classification Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes (Only one-side and after 9th Street on both-side) Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
2nd Avenue between 8th Street and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
2nd Avenue
8th Street
17 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Del Monte Boulevard
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 350 ft east of Reservation Road Posted Speed Limit 35 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:55 AM - 10:20 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)30 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 35 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 4
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 2.03
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 6,012 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Del Monte Blvd and Stop Controlled at Marina Dr Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 54 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Arterial
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes at roundbaout
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Beach Road between Reservation Road and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 35 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
Higher collision rate than statewide average (involving 1 severe injury), presence on uncontrolled crosswalks, horizontal/vertical curves, and merge/diverge lanes justify further reduction in the resulting 85th percentile speed limit . Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 35 mph is reduced to 30 mph.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Beach Road
Reservation Road
18 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Reservation Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 50 FT north of George Way Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:17 AM - 10:24 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)33 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 29 - 38 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,749 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at George Way, Oak Cir, and Costa Del Mar Rd Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 37 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?RRFB
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Del Forest Road between Beach Road and Reservation Road is classified as a collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph with a 10-mph pace range of 29 mph to 38 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of uncontrolled crosswalk, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
De Forest Road
Beach Road
19 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Reservation Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 115 ft south of Tallmon St Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:28 AM - 11:06 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 32 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 24 - 33 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 97.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,353 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Shuler Cir, Tallmon St, Whitney Pl & Quebrada Del Mar Rd, Roundabout at Costa & Sirena Del Mar Rd Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 63 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? Yes - Small Median
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Crescent Avenue between Quebrada Del Mar and Reservation Road is classified as a collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Crescent Avenue
Quebrada Del Mar
20 STREET: SURVEY DATE:########
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 0.1 mile north of Carmel Ave Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:22 AM - 10:44 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)31 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 27 - 36 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3,528 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Carmel Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 48 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Crescent Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue is classified as a collector per the General Plan. There speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Crescent Avenue
Reservation Road
21 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Aaron Way (End)
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 125 ft south of Abdy Way Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:30 AM - 12:05 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 35 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 22 - 31 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,458 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 62 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1 Wide lanes
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II - South of Belle Dr to Reservation Rd) Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes At Abdy Way
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition New
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Cardoza Avenue between Reservation Road and Aaron Way is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.
The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Cardoza Avenue
Reservation Road
Stop controlled at Dolphin Cir, Abdy Way, Ora Ct, Belle Dr, Redondo Ct, Brookside Pl, Lakewood Dr, and Aaron Way
22 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: De Forest Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 205 ft west of Melanie Rd Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:23 AM - 11:13 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)24 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 28 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 18 - 27 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,598 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Roundabout at Del Monte Blvd, Stop controlled at Michael Dr, Fitzgerald Cir, and Villa Cir Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 37 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - Infront of Lone Olson Elementary School with RRFB On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes - Missing at short segments
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and School
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Beach Road between Del Monte Boulevard and De Forest Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of elementary school, multiple driveways, and horizontal curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Beach Road
Del Monte Boulevard
23 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At O'Sullivan Ct Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:19 AM - 10:43 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)32 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 37 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 28 - 37 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.52
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 5,842 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Carmel Ave
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 52 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes - One the east side
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
California Avenue between Reservation Road and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 37 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, Class II bike lanes, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, and residential land use justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
California Avenue
Reservation Road
24 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Reindollar Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Helena Way Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:50 AM - 10:16 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH
Speed Limit Change Increased by 5
MPH
85th Percentile Speed 32 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 6,430 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Carmel Ave, Karen Ct, Helena Way, Tamara Ct, and Reindollar Avenue Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 30 - 62 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes - Slight
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and School
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
California Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reindollar Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 32 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
California Avenue is classified as a Collector Street under the General Plan. The primary purpose of Collector streets is to collect traffic from residential streets and link to higher classification streets such as Arterials. They are intended to move the traffic in an efficient manner. To maintain the street characteristics and to be consistent with speed limit recommended for adjacent Segment # 24 (California Avenue – from Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue), it is recommended that the speed limit is increased to 30 mph.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
California Avenue
Carmel Avenue
25 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 128 ft north of 3rd Ave Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:23 AM - 9:46 AM Recommended Speed Limit 40 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)40 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 45 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 37 - 46 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 2
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.30
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 8,725 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Reindollar Ave, Patton Pkwy, 3rd Ave, and Marina Hts Dr Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.7 mi
Width 35 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II and ends before Patton Pkwy)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes at Marina Hts Dr with HAWK
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes - On west side
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Public facilities , Open spaces and Park
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
California Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Imjin Parkway is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 45 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of Class II Bike Lanes, horizontal and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed. Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 40 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
California Avenue
Reindollar Ave
26 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: 8th Street
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 320 ft north of 9th St Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:48 PM - 2:48 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)26 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 28 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 20 - 29 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87.9%
Number of Survey Samples 58
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 851 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control Stop controlled at Beacon Dr, 5th Ave, 9th St, and 8th St Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.5 mi
Width 27 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Arterial
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No There is a horse crossing sign On-Street Parking? Yes - One side only
Sidewalks? Yes - One side only
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Public facilities , Open spaces, and Commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
California Avenue between Imjin Parkway and 8th Street is classified as an arterial per the General Plan. The existing speed limit is 30 mph.
The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
California Avenue
Imjin Parkway
27 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 65 ft west of Vera Ln Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:24 AM - 11:47 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 34 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 24 - 33 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3,372 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 1.0 mi
Width 42 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Grant St
On-Street Parking? Yes (2 Hr Parking)
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, and Park
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Reindollar Avenue between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
Stop controlled at Sunset Ave, Owen Ave, Zanetta Dr, Talcott Ave, Max Cir, Vera Ln, Crescent St, Vaughan Ave, Ellen St, Kennedy Ct, King Cir, Redwood Dr, and Independence Ave
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reindollar Avenue
Del Monte Boulevard
28 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey At Sunrise Cir and Sunrise Ave Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:44 PM - 1:26 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH
85th Percentile Speed 33 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 90.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,690 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Sunrise Ave
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop Controlled at California Ave, Westwood Ct, Eddy St, Phillips Cir, Sunrise Ave, and Mildred Ct Reindollar Avenue between California Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 33 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical and horizontal curve, uncontrolled crosswalks, and residential land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Reindollar Avenue
California Avenue
29 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/18/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 155 ft east of Vaughan Ave Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 3:27 PM - 4:10 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 31 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 98.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 1
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.18
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3,704 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 1.4 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Pleasant Cir
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Marina Vista Elementary School
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Del Monte Blvd, Elm Ave, Sunset Ave, Seacrest Ave, Zanetta Dr, Crescent Ave, Vaughan Ave, Everett Dr, Pleasant Cir, Redwood Dr, and Califronia Ave Carmel Avenue between Del Monte Boulevard and California Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical curve, uncontrolled crosswalks, and residential land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Carmel Avenue
Del Monte Boulevard
30 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Salinas Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 165 ft east of Lynscott Dr Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:49 AM - 12:39 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)25 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 29 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 22 - 31 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 812 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 39 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Lynscott Dr There is a bus pick-up/Drop-off zone sign On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Crumpton Elementary School
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at California Ave, Bradley Cir, Carmelo Cir, Lynscott Dr, Barrett Ln, Bayer Ave, and Salinas Ave Carmel Avenue between California Avenue and Salinas Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph.
The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, uncontrolled crosswalk, and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Carmel Avenue
California Avenue
31 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Reservation Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 90 ft south of Lavell Ct Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:05 PM - 4:05 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)19 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 24 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 16 - 25 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 93.4%
Number of Survey Samples 91
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 264 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 18 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2 -Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Lynscott Dr
On-Street Parking? Yes - No Sign
Sidewalks? Yes - on one side only
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Poor
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Reservation Rd, Ellis Ct, and Carmel Ave Salinas Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 24 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Salinas Avenue
Carmel Avenue
32 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Marina Greens Drive
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 370 ft south of Marina Green Dr Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:10 PM - 2:10 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)21 MPH Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5 MPH85th Percentile Speed 25 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 17 - 26 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 657 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification Local
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Healy Avenue
Paul Davis Drive between Healy Avenue and Marina Greens Drive is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.
The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 25 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
Presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, and horizontal curves justifies lowering the speed limit. It is recommended that the observed 85th percentile speed limit of 25 mph is adopted for this segment.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Paul Davis Drive
Healy Avenue
33 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/18/2024
FROM: TO: California Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 0.2 mi west of California Ave Posted Speed Limit 40 MPH Time of Speed Survey 1:25 PM - 3:25 PM Recommended Speed Limit 35 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)37 MPH
Speed Limit Change Reduced by 5
MPH
85th Percentile Speed 41 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 34 - 43 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83.1%
Number of Survey Samples 59
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 661 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 29 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? Yes
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition New
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Marina High School
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at California Ave and Crescent St
Patton Parkway between Marina High School and California Avenue is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 40 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 41 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 40 mph.
The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide. The presence of bike routes, horizontal/vertical curves, and residential/school land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Patton Parkway
Marina High School
34 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Reindollar Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 405 ft south of Reindollar Avenue Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 3:06 PM - 4:09 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)26 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 30 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 22 - 31 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 88.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,304 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.1 mi
Width 37 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Patton Pkwy and Reindollar Ave
Crescent Street between Patton Parkway and Reindollar Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 30 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, horizontal and vertical curves justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Crescent Street
Patton Parkway
35 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 390 ft north of Reindollar Avenue Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:47 AM - 11:19 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)26 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 29 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 21 - 30 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 94.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,515 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 33 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Reindollar Ave, Hillcrest Ave, and Carmel Ave Vaughan Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, and vertical curve justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Vaughn Avenue
Reindollar Avenue
36 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Reservation Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 535 ft south of Reservation Rd Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:50 AM - 10:19 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)28 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 31.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 2
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 1.53
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 3,992 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.3 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Carmel Ave
Seacrest Avenue between Carmel Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 30 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is higher than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, and residential/commercial land uses justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Seacrest Avenue
Carmel Avenue
37 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/18/2024
FROM: TO: Carmel Avenue
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 175 ft south of Hillcrest Ave Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:45 PM - 1:18 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)28 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 31 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 94.1%
Number of Survey Samples 101
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,854 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.1 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Hillcrest Ave, Cypress Ave, and Reindollar Ave Sunset Avenue between Reindollar Avenue and Carmel Avenue is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 31 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, and residential/commercial land uses justify reducing the 85th percentile speed limit.
Per CVC 22358.6 (b) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 1], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding down, the posted speed limit may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Sunset Avenue
Reindollar Avenue
38 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Reservation Road
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 100 ft north of Messinger Dr Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:56 AM - 12:31 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed) 32.5 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 36 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 27 - 36 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 86.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 1,521 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic
Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 38 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks? No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Multiple
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Palm Ave, Messinger Dr, Paddon Pl, and Robin Dr Lake Drive between Palm Avenue and Reservation Road is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 36 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph.
Higher than the expected collision rate, presence of on-street parking, driveways and surrounding residential land uses justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Lake Drive
Palm Avenue
39 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/19/2024
FROM: TO: Del Monte Boulevard
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 510 ft east of Lake Drive Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 12:00 PM - 12:48 PM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)26 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 28 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 100.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,878 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 40 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Lake Dr and Marina Dr
Palm Avenue between Lake Drive and Del Monte Boulevard is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The existing posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 28 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph.
The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
The presence of on-street parking, multiple driveways, vertical curve, and residential land uses justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Palm Avenue
Lake Drive
40 STREET: SURVEY DATE:12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 60 ft south of Brostorm Drive Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 9:49 AM - 11:06 AM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 34 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 24 - 33 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,360 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.2 mi
Width 33 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No - Red curb
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Open spaces, Park and recreation
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Preston Dr, Lexington Ct, and Brostorm Dr Abrams Drive between Preston Drive and Imjin Parkway is classified as a Collector per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.
The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph..
Higher than the expected collision rate, presence of horizontal and vertical curve, and residential land uses justify further reducing the observed 85th percentile speed.
Per CVC 22358.6 (c) [MUTCD Section 2B.13 Paragraph 12a Option 2], for cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reductions are used.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Abrams Drive
Preston Drive
41 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/10/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Parkway
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 85 ft west of Wahl Ct Posted Speed Limit 30 MPH Time of Speed Survey 11:09 AM - 12:24 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)27 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 29.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 23 - 32 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 97.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,110 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.6 mi
Width 22 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? No - Red curb
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Open spaces, Park and recreation
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Abrams Dr, Barth Ct, Horn Ct, Wahl Ct, Wittenmyer Ct, Bandholtz Ct, Brown Ct, Landrum Ct, and Ready Ct
Preston Drive between Abrams Drive and Imjin Parkway is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.
The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 29.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 30 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Presence of driveways, park, residential land uses, horizontal and vertical curves further justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general-purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 30 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Preston Drive
Abrams Drive
42 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/5/2024
FROM: TO: 8th Street
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 195 ft north of 10th St Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 10:30 AM - 11:18 AM Recommended Speed Limit 25 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)24 MPH Speed Limit Change - 85th Percentile Speed 27 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 20 - 29 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 97.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 981 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 0.4 mi
Width 31 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes NB-1 SB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No - Just small segment near Imjin Pkwy had median Designated Bike Route? Yes - There is a sign
Bike Lanes? No
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No There is a horse crossing sign On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? No
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential and Commercial
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Imjin Pkwy, Telegraph Blvd, 10th St, Boardwalk Ave, 9th St, and 8th St 3rd Avenue between Imjin Parkway and 8th Street is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph.
The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 27 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 25 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
No further reduction in existing posted speed limit is recommended to maintain the existing street characteristics. Presence of on-street parking, vertical curve, residential and commercial land uses further justify maintaining the existing posted speed limit. Per CVC 22358.8, local agency may retain the currently adopted speed without further reduction, by Ordinance. It has been verified that no additional general- purpose lanes have been added to the roadway segment since the previous E&TS. It is therefore recommended that the existing posted speed limit of 25 mph is retained.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
3rd Avenue
Imjin Parkway
43 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Preston Drive
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 130 ft west of Inchon Ct Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 2:26 PM - 3:02 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)30 MPH Speed Limit Change Increased by 5 MPH 85th Percentile Speed 35.15 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,667 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 1.1 mi
Width 49 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? No - Just small segment near Imjin Pkwy had median Designated Bike Route? Yes - There is a sign
Bike Lanes? Yes (Class II)
Uncontrolled Crosswalks?Yes - At Bluffs Dr There is a horse crossing sign On-Street Parking? Yes
Sidewalks? Yes
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Open spaces, Park and recreation
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at Imjin Pkwy, Brostorm Dr, Wilson Ct, Bayonet Ct, and Preston Dr. Traffic circles at MacArthur Dr, 3rd Ave, and Denall Dr
Abrams Drive between Imjin Parkway and Preston Drive is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 35.15 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding down the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
Abrams Drive is classified as Collector Street per the City’s General Plan. The primary purpose of Collector streets is to collect traffic from residential streets and link to higher classification streets such as Arterials. They are intended to move the traffic in an efficient manner. To maintain the street characteristics and to be consistent with speed limit recommended for adjacent Segment # 41 (Abrams Drive – from Preston to Imjin Parkway), it is recommended that the speed limit is increased to 30 mph.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Abrams Drive
Imjin Pkwy (west)
44 STREET: SURVEY DATE: 12/11/2024
FROM: TO: Imjin Pkwy
SPEED DATA
Location of Speed Survey 450 ft west of Arroyo Dr Posted Speed Limit 25 MPH Time of Speed Survey 1:39 PM - 2:21 PM Recommended Speed Limit 30 MPH 50th Percentile Speed (Mean Speed)29 MPH
Speed Limit Change Increased by 5
MPH
85th Percentile Speed 34 MPH
10 mph Pace Speed 25 - 34 MPH
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 84.0%
Number of Survey Samples 100
COLLISION HISTORY
Number of Years Studied 3
Total Collisions 0
Collision Rate (ACC/MVM) 0.00
Expected Collisions (ACC/MVM) 1.07
TRAFFIC FACTORS
Average Daily Traffic 2,407 Vehicles
Type of Traffic Control
Pedestrian Traffic Low
Truck Traffic Low
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Length of Segment 1.1 mi
Width 37 ft (Approx.)
Number of Lanes EB-1 WB-1
Street Classification 2-Lane Collector
Divided Median? Yes
Designated Bike Route? No
Bike Lanes? No - After Bluffs Dr there is bike lane on both side Uncontrolled Crosswalks?No
On-Street Parking? Yes - After Bonte Dr on both side
Sidewalks? Yes - Only one side
Driveways? Few
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Pavement Condition Fair
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Open spaces, Park and recreation
COMMENTS & JUSTIFICATION
Stop controlled at California Ave, Arroyo Dr, and Imjin Pkwy. Traffic circle at Abrams Dr and Bonte Dr Marina Heights Drive between California Avenue and Imjin Pakrway is classified as a Collector as per the General Plan. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The radar speed data collected shows the 85th-percentile speed as 34 mph. The CVC 22358.6(a) requires rounding speed limit to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, which results in rounding up the 85th percentile speed to 35 mph. The collision rate is lower than the expected collision rate for similar facilities statewide.
Abrams Drive is classified as Collector Street per the City’s General Plan. The primary purpose of Collector streets is to collect traffic from residential streets and link to higher classification streets such as Arterials. They are intended to move the traffic in an efficient manner. To maintain the street characteristics and to be consistent with speed limit recommended for adjacent Segment # 41 (Abrams Drive – from Preston to Imjin Parkway), it is recommended that the speed limit is increased to 30 mph.
CITY OF MARINA
ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
Marina Heights Drive
California Ave
45 City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Appendix D
Radar Speed Survey Data
50 EB WB
42 MPH 51
50 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54
TBD MPH
50 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 24 0 < 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 4 4.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 10 10.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 5 5.0% 8 8% 13.0% 23 23.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 6 6.0% 11 11% 17.0% 40 40.0%
46 - 47 46 - 47 9 9.0% 16 16% 25.0% 65 65.0%
48 - 49 48 - 49 8 8.0% 7 7% 15.0% 80 80.0%
50 - 51 50 - 51 9 9.0% 4 4% 13.0% 93 93.0%
52 - 53 52 - 53 5 5.0% 2 2% 7.0% 100 100.0%
> 53 0 > 53 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
7.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
83.0%
COLLECTOR:
Imjin Parkway
State Route 1 to California Avenue
10.0%MPH42 Below Pace46.5
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 50 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
86.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
1 11:22:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:00:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
54.0%
46.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 24
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
48 - 49
50 - 51
52 - 53
0 > 53
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
35 EB WB
32 MPH 41
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 45
SB/WB 55
TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 13 0 < 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 3 3.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 3 3.0% 8 8% 11.0% 14 14.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 3 3.0% 9 9% 12.0% 26 26.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 12 12.0% 12 12% 24.0% 50 50.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 18 18.0% 10 10% 28.0% 78 78.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 4 4.0% 10 10% 14.0% 92 92.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 5 5.0% 3 3% 8.0% 100 100.0%
> 42 0 > 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
55.0%
45.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
2 11:27:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:53:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
WB lane closure due to long-term construction. Traffic is still free flowing.
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 39.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
34.0%
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
Imjin Parkway
California Avenue to Reservation Road
5.0%MPH33 Below Pace36.5
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
3.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
92.0%
COLLECTOR:
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
0 < 13
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
0 > 42
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
40 NB SB
36 MPH 45
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 24 0 < 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 2 2.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 6 6.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 22 22.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 5 5.0% 8 8% 13.0% 35 35.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 13 13.0% 10 10% 23.0% 58 58.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 7 7.0% 6 6% 13.0% 71 71.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 9 9.0% 7 7% 16.0% 87 87.0%
46 - 47 46 - 47 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 93 93.0%
48 - 49 48 - 49 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 98 98.0%
50 - 51 50 - 51 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
52 - 53 52 - 53 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 53 0 > 53 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
13.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
81.0%
COLLECTOR:
Del Monte Boulevard
SR1/Reindollar Avenue to Reservation Road
6.0%MPH37 Below Pace40.5
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 45 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
50.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
3 9:23:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:46:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 24
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
48 - 49
50 - 51
52 - 53
0 > 53
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
40 NB SB
35 MPH 44
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 35
SB/WB 65
TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 25 0 < 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 2 2.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 5 5.0% 0 0% 5.0% 7 7.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 3 3.0% 0 0% 3.0% 10 10.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 10 10.0% 8 8% 18.0% 28 28.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 6 6.0% 14 14% 20.0% 48 48.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 6 6.0% 16 16% 22.0% 70 70.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 2 2.0% 14 14% 16.0% 86 86.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 1 1.0% 8 8% 9.0% 95 95.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 96 96.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 97 97.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 98 98.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 54 0 > 54 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
4 MPH
Poor
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
5.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
85.0%
COLLECTOR:
Del Monte Boulevard
Reservation Road to Beach Road
10.0%MPH35 Below Pace39
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 42 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
70.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
4 9:35:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:50:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
65.0%
35.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 25
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
0 > 54
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
40 NB SB
36 MPH 45
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 61
SB/WB 39
TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 27 0 < 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 2 2.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 12 12.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 3 3.0% 4 4% 7.0% 19 19.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 30 30.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 12 12.0% 5 5% 17.0% 47 47.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 10 10.0% 5 5% 15.0% 62 62.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 10 10.0% 5 5% 15.0% 77 77.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 6 6.0% 5 5% 11.0% 88 88.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 94 94.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 96 96.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 97 97.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 98 98.0%
55 - 56 55 - 56 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 56 0 > 56 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
2 MPH
Poor
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
15.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
70.0%
COLLECTOR:
Del Monte Boulevard
Beach Road to Marina Greens Drive
15.0%MPH35.85 Below Pace41
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 45.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
47.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
5 9:05:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:30:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
39.0%
61.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 27
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
55 - 56
0 > 56
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
35 EB WB
25 MPH 34
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 4 4.0% 8 8% 12.0% 13 13.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 5 5.0% 16 16% 21.0% 34 34.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 8 8.0% 11 11% 19.0% 53 53.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 9 9.0% 5 5% 14.0% 67 67.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 10 10.0% 4 4% 14.0% 81 81.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 7 7.0% 2 2% 9.0% 90 90.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 94 94.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 97 97.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 99 99.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
5 MPH
Poor
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
14.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
81.0%
COLLECTOR:
Reservation Road
Dunes Drive to Beach Road
5.0%MPH26 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
13.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 34 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
90.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
6 2:27:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
2:50:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 NB SB
26 MPH 35
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 55
SB/WB 45
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 8 0 < 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 5 5.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 1 1.0% 5 5% 6.0% 11 11.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 27 27.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 14 14.0% 9 9% 23.0% 50 50.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 12 12.0% 6 6% 18.0% 68 68.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 9 9.0% 8 8% 17.0% 85 85.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 8 8.0% 4 4% 12.0% 97 97.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 37 0 > 37 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
3 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
3.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
86.0%
COLLECTOR:
Reservation Road
Beach Road to Del Monte Boulevard
11.0%MPH26 Below Pace29.5
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
11.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 33.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
60.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
7 2:52:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
3:05:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
45.0%
55.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 8
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
0 > 37
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
35 EB WB
32 MPH 41
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 54
SB/WB 46
TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 13 0 < 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 6 6.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 10 10.0% 12 12% 22.0% 28 28.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 10 10.0% 10 10% 20.0% 48 48.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 8 8.0% 9 9% 17.0% 65 65.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 11 11.0% 6 6% 17.0% 82 82.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 8 8.0% 1 1% 9.0% 91 91.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 100 100.0%
> 42 0 > 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
1.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
89.0%
COLLECTOR:
Reservation Road
Del Monte Boulevard to Crescent Avenue
10.0%MPH32 Below Pace35
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 39 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
52.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
8 11:52:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:40:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
46.0%
54.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 13
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
0 > 42
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
40 EB WB
35 MPH 44
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 49
SB/WB 51
TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 17 0 < 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 2 2.0% 4 4% 6.0% 6 6.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 7 7.0% 3 3% 10.0% 16 16.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 10 10.0% 15 15% 25.0% 41 41.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 3 3.0% 10 10% 13.0% 54 54.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 13 13.0% 15 15% 28.0% 82 82.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 11 11.0% 3 3% 14.0% 96 96.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 100 100.0%
> 46 0 > 46 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
4.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
90.0%
COLLECTOR:
Reservation Road
Crescent Avenue to California Avenue
6.0%MPH36 Below Pace39
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 43 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
54.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
9 11:15:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:48:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
51.0%
49.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 17
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
0 > 46
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
45 EB WB
41 MPH 50
45 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
45 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 31 0 < 31 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 3 3.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 19 19.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 9 9.0% 8 8% 17.0% 36 36.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 7 7.0% 8 8% 15.0% 51 51.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 6 6.0% 5 5% 11.0% 62 62.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 11 11.0% 10 10% 21.0% 83 83.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 4 4.0% 2 2% 6.0% 89 89.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 2 2.0% 4 4% 6.0% 95 95.0%
55 - 56 55 - 56 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 98 98.0%
57 - 58 57 - 58 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
59 - 60 59 - 60 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 60 0 > 60 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
17.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
80.0%
COLLECTOR:
Reservation Road
California Avenue to Salinas Avenue
3.0%MPH42 Below Pace46
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 51 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
45.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
10 1:28:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
1:57:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 31
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
55 - 56
57 - 58
59 - 60
0 > 60
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
55 EB WB
46 MPH 55
55 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
55 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 37 0 < 37 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 3 3.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 3 3.0% 2 2% 5.0% 8 8.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 4 4.0% 6 6% 10.0% 18 18.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 7 7.0% 8 8% 15.0% 33 33.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 11 11.0% 10 10% 21.0% 54 54.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 2 2.0% 6 6% 8.0% 62 62.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 73 73.0%
55 - 56 55 - 56 6 6.0% 5 5% 11.0% 84 84.0%
57 - 58 57 - 58 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 90 90.0%
59 - 60 59 - 60 3 3.0% 2 2% 5.0% 95 95.0%
61 - 62 61 - 62 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 98 98.0%
63 - 64 63 - 64 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
65 - 66 65 - 66 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 66 0 > 66 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
18.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
69.0%
COLLECTOR:
Reservation Road
Salinas Avenue to Imjin Parkway
13.0%MPH46 Below Pace50
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 57 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
82.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
11 1:02:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
1:26:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 37
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
55 - 56
57 - 58
59 - 60
61 - 62
63 - 64
65 - 66
0 > 66
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
55 EB WB
50 MPH 59
55 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
55 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 36 0 < 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 1 1.0%
46 - 47 46 - 47 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 3 3.0%
48 - 49 48 - 49 6 6.0% 3 3% 9.0% 12 12.0%
50 - 51 50 - 51 5 5.0% 11 11% 16.0% 28 28.0%
52 - 53 52 - 53 7 7.0% 6 6% 13.0% 41 41.0%
54 - 55 54 - 55 9 9.0% 8 8% 17.0% 58 58.0%
56 - 57 56 - 57 6 6.0% 2 2% 8.0% 66 66.0%
58 - 59 58 - 59 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 80 80.0%
60 - 61 60 - 61 5 5.0% 6 6% 11.0% 91 91.0%
62 - 63 62 - 63 2 2.0% 5 5% 7.0% 98 98.0%
64 - 65 64 - 65 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 65 0 > 65 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
5 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
20.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
68.0%
COLLECTOR:
Reservation Road
Imjin Parkway to Blanco Road
12.0%MPH50 Below Pace55
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 60.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
58.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
12 12:39:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:58:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 36
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
48 - 49
50 - 51
52 - 53
54 - 55
56 - 57
58 - 59
60 - 61
62 - 63
64 - 65
0 > 65
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 EB WB
24 MPH 33
25 #Entries 57
NB/EB 23
SB/WB 34
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 4 0 < 4 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
4 - 5 4 - 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
6 - 7 6 - 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 1 1.8% 2 4% 5.3% 3 5.3%
24 - 25 24 - 25 1 1.8% 4 7% 8.8% 8 14.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 4 7.0% 12 21% 28.1% 24 42.1%
28 - 29 28 - 29 5 8.8% 4 7% 15.8% 33 57.9%
30 - 31 30 - 31 7 12.3% 6 11% 22.8% 46 80.7%
32 - 33 32 - 33 5 8.8% 6 11% 19.3% 57 100.0%
> 33 0 > 33 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 57 100.0%
59.6%
40.4%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
13 9:18:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:18:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
None
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
14.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 32.6 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
14.0%
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
8th Street
2nd Avenue to 3rd Avenue
5.3%MPH26 Below Pace28
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
2 MPH
New
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
0.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
94.7%
COLLECTOR:
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 4
4 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
0 > 33
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
40 EB WB
30 MPH 39
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 48
SB/WB 52
TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 18 0 < 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 9 9.0% 2 2% 11.0% 12 12.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 10 10.0% 10 10% 20.0% 32 32.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 6 6% 9.0% 41 41.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 16 16.0% 16 16% 32.0% 73 73.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 3 3.0% 6 6% 9.0% 82 82.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 2 2.0% 8 8% 10.0% 92 92.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 93 93.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 97 97.0%
46 - 47 46 - 47 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 47 0 > 47 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
52.0%
48.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
14 2:50:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
3:52:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 41 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
8th Street
5th Avenue to Inter-Garrison Road
1.0%MPH32 Below Pace
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
18.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
81.0%
COLLECTOR:
In Pace36
MPH MPH
84.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 18
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
0 > 47
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 EB WB
22 MPH 31
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 61
SB/WB 39
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 5 0 < 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 2 2.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 16 16.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 16 16.0% 9 9% 25.0% 41 41.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 17 17.0% 7 7% 24.0% 65 65.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 10 10.0% 9 9% 19.0% 84 84.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 8 8.0% 5 5% 13.0% 97 97.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 34 0 > 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
39.0%
61.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
15 12:04:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:41:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
31.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 31 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
9th Street
1st Avenue to 2nd Avenue
1.0%MPH24 Below Pace
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
4.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
95.0%
COLLECTOR:
In Pace27
MPH MPH
84.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 5
5 - 6
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
0 > 34
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
45 NB SB
38 MPH 47
45 #Entries 100
NB/EB 56
SB/WB 44
TBD MPH
45 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 21 0 < 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 3 3.0% 4 4% 7.0% 7 7.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 13 13.0% 4 4% 17.0% 24 24.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 20 20.0% 15 15% 35.0% 59 59.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 73 73.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 9 9.0% 11 11% 20.0% 93 93.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 96 96.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 4 4.0% 0 0% 4.0% 100 100.0%
> 50 0 > 50 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
44.0%
56.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
16 9:00:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:42:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 46 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
2nd Avenue
Divarty Street to 8th Street
1.0%MPH40 Below Pace
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
4 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
5.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
94.0%
COLLECTOR:
In Pace42
MPH MPH
82.0%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 21
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
0 > 50
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
35 NB SB
29 MPH 38
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54
TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 3 3.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 16 16.0% 10 10% 26.0% 29 29.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 15 15.0% 18 18% 33.0% 62 62.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 8 8.0% 13 13% 21.0% 83 83.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 92 92.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 1 1.0% 5 5% 6.0% 98 98.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 98 98.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
54.0%
46.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
17 9:45:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:26:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 36 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
2nd Avenue
8th Street to Imjin Parkway
1.0%MPH31 Below Pace
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
3 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
4.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
95.0%
COLLECTOR:
In Pace33
MPH MPH
83.0%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
35 EB WB
25 MPH 34
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 40
SB/WB 60
TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 3 3.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 7 7.0% 5 5% 12.0% 15 15.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 31 31.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 6 6.0% 10 10% 16.0% 47 47.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 6 6.0% 6 6% 12.0% 59 59.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 7 7.0% 8 8% 15.0% 74 74.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 10 10% 13.0% 87 87.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 1 1.0% 5 5% 6.0% 93 93.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 5 5% 5.0% 98 98.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
3 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
20.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
74.0%
COLLECTOR:
Beach Road
Reservation Road to Del Monte Boulevard
6.0%MPH25.85 Below Pace30.5
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
15.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 35 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
87.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
18 9:55:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:20:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
60.0%
40.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 NB SB
29 MPH 38
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 36
SB/WB 64
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 13 0 < 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 3 3.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 5 5.0% 2 2% 7.0% 10 10.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 7 7.0% 6 6% 13.0% 23 23.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 7 7.0% 13 13% 20.0% 43 43.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 10 10.0% 25 25% 35.0% 78 78.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 87 87.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 1 1.0% 8 8% 9.0% 96 96.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 98 98.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 42 0 > 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
4.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
86.0%
COLLECTOR:
De Forest Road
Beach Road to Reservation Road
10.0%MPH29.85 Below Pace33
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
2.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 36 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
23.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
19 9:17:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:24:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
64.0%
36.0%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
0 < 13
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
0 > 42
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 NB SB
24 MPH 33
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 8 0 < 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 10 10.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 15 15.0% 14 14% 29.0% 39 39.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 8 8.0% 8 8% 16.0% 55 55.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 10 10.0% 10 10% 20.0% 75 75.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 6 6.0% 16 16% 22.0% 97 97.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 98 98.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 37 0 > 37 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
3.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
97.0%
COLLECTOR:
Crescent Avenue
Quebrada Del Mar to Reservation Road
0.0%MPH26 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
10.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 32 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
10.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
20 10:28:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:06:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
54.0%
46.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 8
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
0 > 37
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 NB SB
27 MPH 36
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 16 0 < 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 5 5.0% 2 2% 7.0% 8 8.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 19 19.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 10 10.0% 7 7% 17.0% 36 36.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 8 8.0% 12 12% 20.0% 56 56.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 66 66.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 4 4.0% 8 8% 12.0% 78 78.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 5 5.0% 9 9% 14.0% 92 92.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 93 93.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 97 97.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 98 98.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 45 0 > 45 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
54.0%
46.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
21 10:22:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:44:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
None
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
8.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 36 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
44.0%
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
Crescent Avenue
Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue
12.0%MPH27 Below Pace31
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
13.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
75.0%
COLLECTOR:
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 16
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
0 > 45
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 NB SB
22 MPH 31
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 54
SB/WB 46
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 12 0 < 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 3 3.0% 0 0% 3.0% 3 3.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 4 4.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 8 8.0% 5 5% 13.0% 17 17.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 6 6.0% 4 4% 10.0% 27 27.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 6 6.0% 6 6% 12.0% 39 39.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 9 9.0% 5 5% 14.0% 53 53.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 10 10.0% 8 8% 18.0% 71 71.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 4 4.0% 4 4% 8.0% 79 79.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 6 6.0% 2 2% 8.0% 87 87.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 91 91.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 7 7% 7.0% 98 98.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 41 0 > 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
3 MPH
New
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
29.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
67.0%
COLLECTOR:
Cardoza Avenue
Reservation Road to Aaron Way (End)
4.0%MPH23 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
27.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 35 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
64.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
22 11:30:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:05:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
46.0%
54.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 12
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
0 > 41
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 EB WB
18 MPH 27
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 51
SB/WB 49
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 5 0 < 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 3 3.0% 0 0% 3.0% 3 3.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 2 2.0% 5 5% 7.0% 10 10.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 6 6.0% 6 6% 12.0% 22 22.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 12 12.0% 5 5% 17.0% 39 39.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 13 13.0% 7 7% 20.0% 59 59.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 7 7.0% 11 11% 18.0% 77 77.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 86 86.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 2 2.0% 6 6% 8.0% 94 94.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 99 99.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 34 0 > 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
18.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
77.0%
COLLECTOR:
Beach Road
Del Monte Boulevard to De Forest Road
5.0%MPH19 Below Pace24
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
69.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 28 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
69.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
23 10:23:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:13:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
49.0%
51.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 5
5 - 6
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
0 > 34
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
35 NB SB
28 MPH 37
35 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
35 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 2 2.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 5 5.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 7 7.0% 11 11% 18.0% 23 23.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 9 9.0% 12 12% 21.0% 44 44.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 11 11.0% 7 7% 18.0% 62 62.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 76 76.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 9 9.0% 4 4% 13.0% 89 89.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 91 91.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 4 4.0% 1 1% 5.0% 96 96.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
11.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
84.0%
COLLECTOR:
California Avenue
Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue
5.0%MPH29 Below Pace32
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
2.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 37 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
76.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
24 10:19:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:43:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 NB SB
23 MPH 32
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 16 0 < 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 1 1.0% 3 3% 4.0% 4 4.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 9 9.0% 8 8% 17.0% 21 21.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 8 8.0% 7 7% 15.0% 36 36.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 10 10.0% 8 8% 18.0% 54 54.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 12 12.0% 13 13% 25.0% 79 79.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 88 88.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 2 2% 5.0% 93 93.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 1 1.0% 3 3% 4.0% 97 97.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 99 99.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 99 99.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 99 99.0%
44 - 45 44 - 45 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 45 0 > 45 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
13.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
84.0%
COLLECTOR:
California Avenue
Carmel Avenue to Reindollar Avenue
3.0%MPH25 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
21.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 32 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
21.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
25 9:50:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:16:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 16
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
0 > 45
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
40 NB SB
37 MPH 46
40 #Entries 100
NB/EB 47
SB/WB 53
TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 25 0 < 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 2 2.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 5 5.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 4 4.0% 4 4% 8.0% 13 13.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 10 10.0% 9 9% 19.0% 32 32.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 12 12.0% 10 10% 22.0% 54 54.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 9 9.0% 6 6% 15.0% 69 69.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 5 5.0% 7 7% 12.0% 81 81.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 4 4.0% 7 7% 11.0% 92 92.0%
47 - 48 47 - 48 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 94 94.0%
49 - 50 49 - 50 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 97 97.0%
51 - 52 51 - 52 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 98 98.0%
53 - 54 53 - 54 2 2.0% 0 0% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 54 0 > 54 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
8.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
79.0%
COLLECTOR:
California Avenue
Reindollar Avenue to Imjin Parkway
13.0%MPH37 Below Pace40
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 45 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
54.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
26 9:23:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
9:46:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
53.0%
47.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 25
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
47 - 48
49 - 50
51 - 52
53 - 54
0 > 54
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 NB SB
20 MPH 29
30 #Entries 58
NB/EB 40
SB/WB 18
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 4 0 < 4 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
4 - 5 4 - 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
6 - 7 6 - 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 2 3.4% 5 9% 12.1% 7 12.1%
22 - 23 22 - 23 12 20.7% 2 3% 24.1% 21 36.2%
24 - 25 24 - 25 6 10.3% 1 2% 12.1% 28 48.3%
26 - 27 26 - 27 13 22.4% 7 12% 34.5% 48 82.8%
28 - 29 28 - 29 2 3.4% 1 2% 5.2% 51 87.9%
30 - 31 30 - 31 4 6.9% 2 3% 10.3% 57 98.3%
32 - 33 32 - 33 1 1.7% 0 0% 1.7% 58 100.0%
> 33 0 > 33 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 58 100.0%
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
31.0%
69.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
27 12:48:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
2:48:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
48.3%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 28 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
California Avenue
Imjin Parkway to 8th Street
0.0%MPH22 Below Pace
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
12.1%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
87.9%
COLLECTOR:
In Pace26
MPH MPH
91.4%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 4
4 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
0 > 33
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 EB WB
24 MPH 33
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 48
SB/WB 52
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 12 0 < 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 3 3.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 7 7.0% 8 8% 15.0% 18 18.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 10 10.0% 12 12% 22.0% 40 40.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 9 9.0% 9 9% 18.0% 58 58.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 8 8.0% 7 7% 15.0% 73 73.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 84 84.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 3.0% 5 5% 8.0% 92 92.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 96 96.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 97 97.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 41 0 > 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
52.0%
48.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
28 11:24:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:47:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
None
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
18.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 34 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
18.0%
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
Reindollar Avenue
Del Monte Boulevard to California Avenue
3.0%MPH25 Below Pace29
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
16.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
81.0%
COLLECTOR:
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 12
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
0 > 41
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 EB WB
25 MPH 34
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 7 0 < 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 2 2.0% 4 4% 6.0% 7 7.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 11 11.0% 6 6% 17.0% 24 24.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 13 13.0% 11 11% 24.0% 48 48.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 11 11.0% 12 12% 23.0% 71 71.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 4 4.0% 6 6% 10.0% 81 81.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 97 97.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 36 0 > 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
3.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
90.0%
COLLECTOR:
Reindollar Avenue
California Avenue to Carmel Avenue
7.0%MPH25 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
16.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 33 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
71.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
29 12:44:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
1:26:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 7
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
0 > 36
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 EB WB
23 MPH 32
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 46
SB/WB 54
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 5 0 < 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 5 5.0% 12 12% 17.0% 17 17.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 7 7.0% 11 11% 18.0% 35 35.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 20 20.0% 15 15% 35.0% 70 70.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 7 7.0% 5 5% 12.0% 82 82.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 6 6.0% 10 10% 16.0% 98 98.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 100 100.0%
> 34 0 > 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
54.0%
46.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
30 3:27:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
4:10:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
None
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
23.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 31 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
23.0%
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
Carmel Avenue
Del Monte Boulevard to California Avenue
0.0%MPH24 Below Pace27
Josh
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
2.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
98.0%
COLLECTOR:
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 5
5 - 6
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
0 > 34
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 EB WB
22 MPH 31
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 7 0 < 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 4 4.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 2 2.0% 6 6% 8.0% 12 12.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 7 7.0% 4 4% 11.0% 23 23.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 9 9.0% 10 10% 19.0% 42 42.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 12 12.0% 14 14% 26.0% 68 68.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 6 6.0% 9 9% 15.0% 83 83.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 93 93.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 4 4.0% 1 1% 5.0% 98 98.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 99 99.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 36 0 > 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
2.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
85.0%
COLLECTOR:
Carmel Avenue
California Avenue to Salinas Avenue
13.0%MPH22 Below Pace25
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
56.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 29 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
56.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
31 10:49:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:39:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 7
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
0 > 36
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 NB SB
16 MPH 25
25 #Entries 91
NB/EB 61
SB/WB 30
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 0 0 < 0 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
0 - 1 0 - 1 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
2 - 3 2 - 3 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
4 - 5 4 - 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
6 - 7 6 - 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 2 2.2% 2 2% 4.4% 4 4.4%
16 - 17 16 - 17 8 8.8% 6 7% 15.4% 18 19.8%
18 - 19 18 - 19 21 23.1% 10 11% 34.1% 49 53.8%
20 - 21 20 - 21 11 12.1% 6 7% 18.7% 66 72.5%
22 - 23 22 - 23 7 7.7% 1 1% 8.8% 74 81.3%
24 - 25 24 - 25 11 12.1% 4 4% 16.5% 89 97.8%
26 - 27 26 - 27 1 1.1% 0 0% 1.1% 90 98.9%
28 - 29 28 - 29 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.1% 91 100.0%
> 29 0 > 29 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 91 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Poor
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
2.2%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
93.4%
COLLECTOR:
Salinas Avenue
Carmel Avenue to Reservation Road
4.4%MPH17 Below Pace19
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
97.8%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 24 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
97.8%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
32 2:05:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
4:05:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
33.0%
67.0%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 0
0 - 1
2 - 3
4 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
0 > 29
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 NB SB
17 MPH 26
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 41
SB/WB 59
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 2 0 < 2 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
2 - 3 2 - 3 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
4 - 5 4 - 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
6 - 7 6 - 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 2 3% 2.5% 2 2.5%
16 - 17 16 - 17 1 1.3% 4 5% 6.3% 7 8.8%
18 - 19 18 - 19 6 7.5% 6 8% 15.0% 19 23.8%
20 - 21 20 - 21 9 11.3% 10 13% 23.8% 38 47.5%
22 - 23 22 - 23 8 10.0% 8 10% 20.0% 54 67.5%
24 - 25 24 - 25 8 10.0% 4 5% 15.0% 66 82.5%
26 - 27 26 - 27 3 3.8% 2 3% 6.3% 71 88.8%
28 - 29 28 - 29 4 5.0% 2 3% 7.5% 77 96.3%
30 - 31 30 - 31 2 2.5% 1 1% 3.8% 80 100.0%
> 31 0 > 31 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 80 100.0%
Josh
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
11.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
85.0%
COLLECTOR:
Paul Davis Drive
Healy Avenue to Marina Greens Drive
4.0%MPH18 Below Pace21
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
86.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 25 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
99.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
33 12:10:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
2:10:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
59.0%
41.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 2
2 - 3
4 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
0 > 31
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
40 EB WB
34 MPH 43
40 #Entries 59
NB/EB 25
SB/WB 34
TBD MPH
40 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 20 0 < 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 1 1.7% 0 0% 1.7% 1 1.7%
30 - 31 30 - 31 1 1.7% 2 3% 5.1% 4 6.8%
32 - 33 32 - 33 2 3.4% 3 5% 8.5% 9 15.3%
34 - 35 34 - 35 3 5.1% 4 7% 11.9% 16 27.1%
36 - 37 36 - 37 10 16.9% 7 12% 28.8% 33 55.9%
38 - 39 38 - 39 3 5.1% 6 10% 15.3% 42 71.2%
40 - 41 40 - 41 3 5.1% 6 10% 15.3% 51 86.4%
42 - 43 42 - 43 2 3.4% 5 8% 11.9% 58 98.3%
44 - 45 44 - 45 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 58 98.3%
46 - 47 46 - 47 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 58 98.3%
48 - 49 48 - 49 0 0.0% 1 2% 1.7% 59 100.0%
> 49 0 > 49 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 59 100.0%
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
New
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
1.7%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
83.1%
COLLECTOR:
Patton Parkway
Marina High School to California Avenue
15.3%MPH33.7 Below Pace37
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
0.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 41 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
78.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
34 1:25:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
3:25:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
57.6%
42.4%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 20
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
44 - 45
46 - 47
48 - 49
0 > 49
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 NB SB
22 MPH 31
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 9 0 < 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 5 5.0% 7 7% 12.0% 13 13.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 9 9.0% 9 9% 18.0% 31 31.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 12 12.0% 11 11% 23.0% 54 54.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 13 13.0% 9 9% 22.0% 76 76.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 4 4.0% 6 6% 10.0% 86 86.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 4 4.0% 2 2% 6.0% 92 92.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 97 97.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 99 99.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 38 0 > 38 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
8.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
88.0%
COLLECTOR:
Crescent Street
Patton Parkway to Reindollar Avenue
4.0%MPH23 Below Pace26
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
40.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 30 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
40.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
35 3:06:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
4:09:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 9
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
0 > 38
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 NB SB
21 MPH 30
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 53
SB/WB 47
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 3 0 < 3 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
3 - 4 3 - 4 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 11 11.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 8 8.0% 8 8% 16.0% 27 27.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 14 14.0% 10 10% 24.0% 51 51.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 14 14.0% 13 13% 27.0% 78 78.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 7 7.0% 10 10% 17.0% 95 95.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 4 4.0% 1 1% 5.0% 100 100.0%
> 32 0 > 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
47.0%
53.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
36 10:47:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:19:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
None
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
38.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 29 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
38.0%
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
Vaughn Avenue
Reindollar Avenue to Carmel Avenue
1.0%MPH23 Below Pace26
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
5.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
94.0%
COLLECTOR:
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 3
3 - 4
5 - 6
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
0 > 32
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 NB SB
23 MPH 32
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 10 0 < 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 5 5.0% 1 1% 6.0% 7 7.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 13 13.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 12 12.0% 9 9% 21.0% 34 34.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 7 7.0% 7 7% 14.0% 48 48.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 9 9.0% 12 12% 21.0% 69 69.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 85 85.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 94 94.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 2 2.0% 2 2% 4.0% 98 98.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 39 0 > 39 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
50.0%
50.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
37 9:50:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
10:19:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
None
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
34.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 31.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
76.0%
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
Seacrest Avenue
Carmel Avenue to Reservation Road
11.0%MPH24 Below Pace28
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
8.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
81.0%
COLLECTOR:
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
0 < 10
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
0 > 39
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 NB SB
23 MPH 32
25 #Entries 101
NB/EB 51
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 7 0 < 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 1 1.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 3 3.0% 6 6% 8.9% 10 9.9%
25 - 26 25 - 26 9 8.9% 8 8% 16.8% 27 26.7%
27 - 28 27 - 28 16 15.8% 19 19% 34.7% 62 61.4%
29 - 30 29 - 30 12 11.9% 8 8% 19.8% 82 81.2%
31 - 32 31 - 32 7 6.9% 7 7% 13.9% 96 95.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 3 3.0% 1 1% 4.0% 100 99.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 101 100.0%
> 36 0 > 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 101 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
5.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
94.1%
COLLECTOR:
Sunset Avenue
Reindollar Avenue to Carmel Avenue
1.0%MPH25 Below Pace28
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 18, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
16.8%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 31 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
16.8%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
38 12:45:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
1:18:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
49.5%
50.5%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
0 < 7
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
0 > 36
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 NB SB
27 MPH 36
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 54
SB/WB 46
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 17 0 < 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 2 2.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 8 8.0% 2 2% 10.0% 12 12.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 10 10.0% 9 9% 19.0% 31 31.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 11 11.0% 8 8% 19.0% 50 50.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 12 12.0% 14 14% 26.0% 76 76.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 7 7.0% 5 5% 12.0% 88 88.0%
37 - 38 37 - 38 4 4.0% 4 4% 8.0% 96 96.0%
39 - 40 39 - 40 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 99 99.0%
41 - 42 41 - 42 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 99 99.0%
43 - 44 43 - 44 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 99 99.0%
45 - 46 45 - 46 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 46 0 > 46 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
46.0%
54.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
39 11:56:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:31:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
None
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
2.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 36 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
31.0%
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
Lake Drive
Palm Avenue to Reservation Road
2.0%MPH29 Below Pace32.5
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
12.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
86.0%
COLLECTOR:
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 17
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
37 - 38
39 - 40
41 - 42
43 - 44
45 - 46
0 > 46
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 EB WB
23 MPH 32
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 47
SB/WB 53
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 3 0 < 3 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
3 - 4 3 - 4 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
5 - 6 5 - 6 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 16 16.0% 14 14% 30.0% 30 30.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 16 16.0% 10 10% 26.0% 56 56.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 11 11.0% 19 19% 30.0% 86 86.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 3 3.0% 4 4% 7.0% 93 93.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 1 1.0% 6 6% 7.0% 100 100.0%
> 32 0 > 32 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
53.0%
47.0%
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
40 12:00:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:48:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
None
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
40.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 28 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
40.0%
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 19, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
Palm Avenue
Lake Drive to Del Monte Boulevard
0.0%MPH24 Below Pace26
Jesus Nunez
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
0.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
100.0%
COLLECTOR:
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0%
0 < 3
3 - 4
5 - 6
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
0 > 32
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 NB SB
24 MPH 33
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 2 2.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 1 1.0% 2 2% 3.0% 5 5.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 10 10.0% 5 5% 15.0% 20 20.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 9 9.0% 4 4% 13.0% 33 33.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 14 14.0% 6 6% 20.0% 53 53.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 6 6.0% 16 16% 22.0% 75 75.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 2 2.0% 5 5% 7.0% 82 82.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 4 4.0% 4 4% 8.0% 90 90.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 95 95.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 0 0.0% 3 3% 3.0% 98 98.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
18.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
77.0%
COLLECTOR:
Abrams Drive
Preston Drive to Imjin Parkway
5.0%MPH25 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
20.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 34 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
65.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
41 9:49:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:06:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 EB WB
23 MPH 32
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 47
SB/WB 53
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 7 0 < 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
7 - 8 7 - 8 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
9 - 10 9 - 10 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
11 - 12 11 - 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
13 - 14 13 - 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
15 - 16 15 - 16 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
17 - 18 17 - 18 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
19 - 20 19 - 20 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
21 - 22 21 - 22 0 0.0% 2 2% 2.0% 2 2.0%
23 - 24 23 - 24 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 18 18.0%
25 - 26 25 - 26 14 14.0% 11 11% 25.0% 43 43.0%
27 - 28 27 - 28 13 13.0% 15 15% 28.0% 71 71.0%
29 - 30 29 - 30 10 10.0% 12 12% 22.0% 93 93.0%
31 - 32 31 - 32 3 3.0% 3 3% 6.0% 99 99.0%
33 - 34 33 - 34 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 99 99.0%
35 - 36 35 - 36 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 36 0 > 36 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
1.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
97.0%
COLLECTOR:
Preston Drive
Abrams Drive to Imjin Parkway
2.0%MPH24 Below Pace27
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Tuesday, December 10, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
26.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 29.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
93.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
42 11:09:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
12:24:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Arterial
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
53.0%
47.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
0 < 7
7 - 8
9 - 10
11 - 12
13 - 14
15 - 16
17 - 18
19 - 20
21 - 22
23 - 24
25 - 26
27 - 28
29 - 30
31 - 32
33 - 34
35 - 36
0 > 36
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 NB SB
20 MPH 29
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 55
SB/WB 45
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 2 0 < 2 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
2 - 3 2 - 3 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
4 - 5 4 - 5 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
6 - 7 6 - 7 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
8 - 9 8 - 9 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
10 - 11 10 - 11 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 2 2.0% 3 3% 5.0% 5 5.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 22 22.0% 14 14% 36.0% 41 41.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 11 11.0% 12 12% 23.0% 64 64.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 13 13.0% 10 10% 23.0% 87 87.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 97 97.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 2 2.0% 1 1% 3.0% 100 100.0%
> 31 0 > 31 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Jesus
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
3.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
97.0%
COLLECTOR:
3rd Avenue
Imjin Parkway to 8th Street
0.0%MPH22 Below Pace24
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
64.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 27 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
64.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
43 10:30:00 AM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
11:18:00 AM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
45.0%
55.0%
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0%
0 < 2
2 - 3
4 - 5
6 - 7
8 - 9
10 - 11
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
0 > 31
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
30 EB WB
25 MPH 34
30 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
30 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 14 0 < 14 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 7 7.0% 5 5% 12.0% 13 13.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 7 7.0% 9 9% 16.0% 29 29.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 10 10.0% 8 8% 18.0% 47 47.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 6 6.0% 11 11% 17.0% 64 64.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 5 5.0% 5 5% 10.0% 74 74.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 6 6.0% 5 5% 11.0% 85 85.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 5 5.0% 3 3% 8.0% 93 93.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 3 3.0% 2 2% 5.0% 98 98.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 99 99.0%
42 - 43 42 - 43 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 43 0 > 43 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
21.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
74.0%
COLLECTOR:
Abrams Drive
Imjin Pkwy (west) to Preston Drive
5.0%MPH26 Below Pace30
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
13.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 35.15 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
55.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
44 2:26:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
3:02:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0%
0 < 14
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
42 - 43
0 > 43
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
25 EB WB
25 MPH 34
25 #Entries 100
NB/EB 50
SB/WB 50
TBD MPH
25 MPH
NB/EB # NB/EB % SB/WB # SB/WB % Total % # %
< 12 0 < 12 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
12 - 13 12 - 13 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
14 - 15 14 - 15 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
16 - 17 16 - 17 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
18 - 19 18 - 19 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
20 - 21 20 - 21 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 0 0.0%
22 - 23 22 - 23 0 0.0% 1 1% 1.0% 1 1.0%
24 - 25 24 - 25 4 4.0% 5 5% 9.0% 10 10.0%
26 - 27 26 - 27 9 9.0% 10 10% 19.0% 29 29.0%
28 - 29 28 - 29 7 7.0% 16 16% 23.0% 52 52.0%
30 - 31 30 - 31 11 11.0% 7 7% 18.0% 70 70.0%
32 - 33 32 - 33 8 8.0% 2 2% 10.0% 80 80.0%
34 - 35 34 - 35 6 6.0% 6 6% 12.0% 92 92.0%
36 - 37 36 - 37 3 3.0% 2 2% 5.0% 97 97.0%
38 - 39 38 - 39 1 1.0% 1 1% 2.0% 99 99.0%
40 - 41 40 - 41 1 1.0% 0 0% 1.0% 100 100.0%
> 41 0 > 41 0 0.0% 0 0% 0.0% 100 100.0%
Randy
Sunny
2 MPH
Fair
PACE SPEED
Above Pace
MPH
11.0%
PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMIT
84.0%
COLLECTOR:
Marina Heights Drive
California Ave to Imjin Pkwy
5.0%MPH26 Below Pace29
# OF LANES:
TO
SURVEY LIMITS:
SURVEY DATE: Wednesday, December 11, 2024
SURVEY START TIME:
SURVEY END TIME:
STREET CLASSIFICATION:
WEATHER:
DIRECTION OF COLLECTION
10.0%
EXISTING SPEED LIMIT
POSTED SPEED:
25 34 MPH
DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC:
COMPLYING COMPLYING
In Pace
MPH MPH
10.0%
NONE
FREQUENCY CUMULATIVE
RECOMMENDED SPEED LIMIT:
SPEED ZONE LIMITS:
IDAX RADAR SAMPLE SPEED SURVEY
CRITICAL SPEED
(85TH PERCENTILE)
45 1:39:00 PM
LOCATION:
50TH
PERCENTILE 15TH PERCENTILE
2:21:00 PM
MPH
ROAD CONDITION:
Residential
ROADWAY SURVEYED:
UNUSUAL CONDITIONS:
50.0%
50.0%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0%
0 < 12
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 19
20 - 21
22 - 23
24 - 25
26 - 27
28 - 29
30 - 31
32 - 33
34 - 35
36 - 37
38 - 39
40 - 41
0 > 41
Percent of Observations
Speed in Miles per Hour
Percent of Total Observations
SB/WB % NB/EB %
City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Appendix E
Radar Gun Calibration Certificate
City of Marina May 2025
Engineering and Traffic Survey for Speed Limits
Appendix F
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Data
Location: Imjin Parkway, State Route 1 to California Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 01
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 80 43 123 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80 43 123 1:00 AM 38 26 64 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 38 26 64 2:00 AM 25 26 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 26 51 3:00 AM 21 69 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 69 90 4:00 AM 31 160 191 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 160 191 5:00 AM 71 332 403 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 71 332 403 6:00 AM 278 863 1,141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 278 863 1,141 7:00 AM 657 882 1,539 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 657 882 1,539 8:00 AM 636 845 1,481 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 636 845 1,481 9:00 AM 577 892 1,469 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 577 892 1,469 10:00 AM 536 790 1,326 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 536 790 1,326 11:00 AM 678 789 1,467 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 678 789 1,467 12:00 PM 817 856 1,673 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 817 856 1,673 1:00 PM 849 801 1,650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 849 801 1,650 2:00 PM 967 845 1,812 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 967 845 1,812 3:00 PM 1,116 858 1,974 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,116 858 1,974 4:00 PM 1,147 784 1,931 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,147 784 1,931 5:00 PM 1,114 924 2,038 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,114 924 2,038 6:00 PM 909 733 1,642 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 909 733 1,642 7:00 PM 717 455 1,172 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 717 455 1,172 8:00 PM 676 320 996 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 676 320 996 9:00 PM 457 228 685 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 457 228 685 10:00 PM 317 166 483 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 317 166 483 11:00 PM 207 80 287 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 207 80 287 Total 12,921 12,767 25,688 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12,921 12,767 25,688 Percent 50% 50% - - - - - - - - - - - - 50% 50%
AM Peak 11:00 09:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 09:00 07:00 Vol. 678 892 1,539 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 678 892 1,539 PM Peak 16:00 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 1,147 924 2,038 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,147 924 2,038
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Imjin Parkway, California Avenue to Reservation Road Date Range: 12/12/2024 - 12/18/2024
Site Code: 02
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 81 46 127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 81 46 127 1:00 AM 48 22 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 22 70 2:00 AM 26 20 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 20 46 3:00 AM 16 57 73 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 57 73 4:00 AM 34 122 156 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34 122 156 5:00 AM 72 233 305 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 233 305 6:00 AM 241 611 852 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 241 611 852 7:00 AM 673 577 1,250 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 673 577 1,250 8:00 AM 623 592 1,215 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 623 592 1,215 9:00 AM 484 681 1,165 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 484 681 1,165 10:00 AM 503 591 1,094 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 503 591 1,094 11:00 AM 594 622 1,216 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 594 622 1,216 12:00 PM 630 615 1,245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 630 615 1,245 1:00 PM 696 657 1,353 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 696 657 1,353 2:00 PM 782 634 1,416 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 782 634 1,416 3:00 PM 906 713 1,619 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 906 713 1,619 4:00 PM 791 700 1,491 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 791 700 1,491 5:00 PM 889 684 1,573 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 889 684 1,573 6:00 PM 719 554 1,273 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 719 554 1,273 7:00 PM 539 370 909 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 539 370 909 8:00 PM 503 279 782 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 503 279 782 9:00 PM 406 198 604 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 406 198 604 10:00 PM 287 155 442 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 287 155 442 11:00 PM 178 80 258 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 178 80 258 Total 10,721 9,813 20,534 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10,721 9,813 20,534 Percent 52% 48% - - - - - - - - - - - - 52% 48%
AM Peak 07:00 09:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 09:00 07:00 Vol. 673 681 1,250 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 673 681 1,250 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 906 713 1,619 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 906 713 1,619
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Mid-Week Average12/18/202412/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 12/16/2024 12/17/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Del Monte Boulevard, Reindollar Avenue to Reservation Road Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 03
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 76 24 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 24 100 1:00 AM 28 19 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 19 47 2:00 AM 21 16 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 16 37 3:00 AM 19 47 66 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 47 66 4:00 AM 18 96 114 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 96 114 5:00 AM 48 245 293 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 245 293 6:00 AM 134 780 914 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 134 780 914 7:00 AM 411 1,085 1,496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 411 1,085 1,496 8:00 AM 534 821 1,355 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 534 821 1,355 9:00 AM 442 752 1,194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 442 752 1,194 10:00 AM 560 663 1,223 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 560 663 1,223 11:00 AM 740 648 1,388 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 740 648 1,388 12:00 PM 701 714 1,415 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 701 714 1,415 1:00 PM 704 676 1,380 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 704 676 1,380 2:00 PM 781 750 1,531 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 781 750 1,531 3:00 PM 868 761 1,629 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 868 761 1,629 4:00 PM 1,160 711 1,871 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,160 711 1,871 5:00 PM 1,153 768 1,921 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,153 768 1,921 6:00 PM 813 495 1,308 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 813 495 1,308 7:00 PM 591 364 955 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 591 364 955 8:00 PM 474 306 780 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 474 306 780 9:00 PM 409 217 626 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 409 217 626 10:00 PM 266 154 420 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 266 154 420 11:00 PM 169 72 241 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 169 72 241 Total 11,120 11,184 22,304 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11,120 11,184 22,304 Percent 50% 50% - - - - - - - - - - - - 50% 50%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 740 1,085 1,496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 740 1,085 1,496 PM Peak 16:00 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 1,160 768 1,921 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,160 768 1,921
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Del Monte Boulevard, Reservation Road to Beach Road Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 04
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 29 11 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 11 40 1:00 AM 17 14 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 14 31 2:00 AM 11 11 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 11 22 3:00 AM 19 7 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 7 26 4:00 AM 26 15 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 15 41 5:00 AM 77 49 126 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 77 49 126 6:00 AM 172 141 313 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 172 141 313 7:00 AM 287 392 679 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 287 392 679 8:00 AM 269 299 568 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 269 299 568 9:00 AM 247 199 446 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 247 199 446 10:00 AM 237 191 428 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 237 191 428 11:00 AM 314 248 562 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 314 248 562 12:00 PM 337 265 602 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 337 265 602 1:00 PM 341 283 624 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 341 283 624 2:00 PM 382 322 704 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 382 322 704 3:00 PM 433 338 771 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 433 338 771 4:00 PM 452 336 788 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 452 336 788 5:00 PM 482 308 790 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 482 308 790 6:00 PM 298 217 515 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 298 217 515 7:00 PM 192 155 347 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 192 155 347 8:00 PM 166 117 283 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 166 117 283 9:00 PM 119 77 196 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 119 77 196 10:00 PM 79 50 129 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 79 50 129 11:00 PM 54 36 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 36 90 Total 5,040 4,081 9,121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5,040 4,081 9,121 Percent 55% 45% - - - - - - - - - - - - 55% 45%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 314 392 679 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 314 392 679 PM Peak 17:00 15:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 15:00 17:00 Vol. 482 338 790 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 482 338 790
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Del Monte Boulevard, Beach Road to Marina Greens Drive Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 05
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 16 8 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 8 24 1:00 AM 5 8 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 8 13 2:00 AM 10 11 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 11 21 3:00 AM 8 5 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 5 13 4:00 AM 19 13 32 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 13 32 5:00 AM 39 31 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 31 70 6:00 AM 125 121 246 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 125 121 246 7:00 AM 202 261 463 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 202 261 463 8:00 AM 185 161 346 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 185 161 346 9:00 AM 153 119 272 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 153 119 272 10:00 AM 154 120 274 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 154 120 274 11:00 AM 184 137 321 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 184 137 321 12:00 PM 198 145 343 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 198 145 343 1:00 PM 170 167 337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 170 167 337 2:00 PM 222 172 394 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 222 172 394 3:00 PM 242 223 465 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 242 223 465 4:00 PM 278 218 496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 278 218 496 5:00 PM 257 173 430 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 257 173 430 6:00 PM 159 95 254 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 159 95 254 7:00 PM 79 80 159 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 79 80 159 8:00 PM 72 52 124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 52 124 9:00 PM 56 30 86 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 56 30 86 10:00 PM 39 37 76 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 37 76 11:00 PM 26 17 43 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 17 43 Total 2,898 2,404 5,302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,898 2,404 5,302 Percent 55% 45% - - - - - - - - - - - - 55% 45%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 202 261 463 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 202 261 463 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 15:00 16:00 Vol. 278 223 496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 278 223 496
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Reservation Road, Dunes Drive to Beach Road
Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 06
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 25 12 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 12 37 1:00 AM 21 12 33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 12 33 2:00 AM 9 12 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 12 21 3:00 AM 8 17 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 17 25 4:00 AM 16 24 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 24 40 5:00 AM 37 59 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 59 96 6:00 AM 147 208 355 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 147 208 355 7:00 AM 240 328 568 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 240 328 568 8:00 AM 186 248 434 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 186 248 434 9:00 AM 167 235 402 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 167 235 402 10:00 AM 194 239 433 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 194 239 433 11:00 AM 173 254 427 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 173 254 427 12:00 PM 214 270 484 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 214 270 484 1:00 PM 196 269 465 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 196 269 465 2:00 PM 230 325 555 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 230 325 555 3:00 PM 273 300 573 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 273 300 573 4:00 PM 295 323 618 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 295 323 618 5:00 PM 320 244 564 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 320 244 564 6:00 PM 173 177 350 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 173 177 350 7:00 PM 161 132 293 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 161 132 293 8:00 PM 103 113 216 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 103 113 216 9:00 PM 81 98 179 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 81 98 179 10:00 PM 60 47 107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 60 47 107 11:00 PM 48 25 73 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 25 73 Total 3,377 3,971 7,348 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,377 3,971 7,348 Percent 46% 54% - - - - - - - - - - - - 46% 54%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 240 328 568 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 240 328 568 PM Peak 17:00 14:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 14:00 16:00 Vol. 320 325 618 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 320 325 618
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Reservation Road, Beach Road to Del Monte Boulevard Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 07
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 8 20 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 20 28 1:00 AM 5 11 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 11 16 2:00 AM 9 5 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 5 14 3:00 AM 12 7 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 7 19 4:00 AM 11 11 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 11 22 5:00 AM 55 22 77 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 22 77 6:00 AM 87 120 207 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 87 120 207 7:00 AM 204 231 435 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 204 231 435 8:00 AM 221 212 433 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 221 212 433 9:00 AM 176 169 345 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 176 169 345 10:00 AM 173 183 356 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 173 183 356 11:00 AM 206 205 411 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 206 205 411 12:00 PM 204 216 420 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 204 216 420 1:00 PM 199 190 389 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 199 190 389 2:00 PM 244 204 448 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 244 204 448 3:00 PM 291 303 594 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 291 303 594 4:00 PM 293 290 583 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 293 290 583 5:00 PM 281 299 580 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 281 299 580 6:00 PM 211 170 381 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 211 170 381 7:00 PM 137 158 295 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 137 158 295 8:00 PM 106 113 219 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 106 113 219 9:00 PM 89 72 161 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 89 72 161 10:00 PM 41 60 101 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 60 101 11:00 PM 23 39 62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 39 62 Total 3,286 3,310 6,596 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,286 3,310 6,596 Percent 50% 50% - - - - - - - - - - - - 50% 50%
AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 221 231 435 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 221 231 435 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 293 303 594 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 293 303 594
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Reservation Road, Del Monte Boulevard to Crescent Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 08
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 57 35 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 35 92 1:00 AM 27 19 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 19 46 2:00 AM 20 16 36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 16 36 3:00 AM 13 25 38 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 25 38 4:00 AM 26 58 84 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 58 84 5:00 AM 74 165 239 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 74 165 239 6:00 AM 234 490 724 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 234 490 724 7:00 AM 521 663 1,184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 521 663 1,184 8:00 AM 467 624 1,091 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 467 624 1,091 9:00 AM 465 643 1,108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 465 643 1,108 10:00 AM 477 583 1,060 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 477 583 1,060 11:00 AM 527 630 1,157 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 527 630 1,157 12:00 PM 617 649 1,266 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 617 649 1,266 1:00 PM 671 651 1,322 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 671 651 1,322 2:00 PM 687 679 1,366 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 687 679 1,366 3:00 PM 704 714 1,418 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 704 714 1,418 4:00 PM 814 761 1,575 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 814 761 1,575 5:00 PM 742 795 1,537 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 742 795 1,537 6:00 PM 542 486 1,028 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 542 486 1,028 7:00 PM 371 341 712 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 371 341 712 8:00 PM 325 282 607 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 325 282 607 9:00 PM 245 183 428 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 245 183 428 10:00 PM 176 120 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 176 120 296 11:00 PM 115 64 179 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 115 64 179 Total 8,917 9,676 18,593 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8,917 9,676 18,593 Percent 48% 52% - - - - - - - - - - - - 48% 52%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 527 663 1,184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 527 663 1,184 PM Peak 16:00 17:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 17:00 16:00 Vol. 814 795 1,575 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 814 795 1,575
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Reservation Road, Crescent Avenue to California Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 09
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 37 49 86 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 49 86 1:00 AM 22 22 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 22 44 2:00 AM 12 15 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 15 27 3:00 AM 16 11 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 11 27 4:00 AM 42 28 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42 28 70 5:00 AM 135 90 225 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 135 90 225 6:00 AM 455 267 722 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 455 267 722 7:00 AM 672 541 1,213 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 672 541 1,213 8:00 AM 638 522 1,160 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 638 522 1,160 9:00 AM 555 402 957 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 555 402 957 10:00 AM 449 393 842 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 449 393 842 11:00 AM 521 478 999 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 521 478 999 12:00 PM 577 583 1,160 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 577 583 1,160 1:00 PM 515 627 1,142 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 515 627 1,142 2:00 PM 634 646 1,280 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 634 646 1,280 3:00 PM 620 735 1,355 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 620 735 1,355 4:00 PM 715 778 1,493 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 715 778 1,493 5:00 PM 734 676 1,410 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 734 676 1,410 6:00 PM 449 544 993 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 449 544 993 7:00 PM 294 371 665 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 294 371 665 8:00 PM 254 282 536 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 254 282 536 9:00 PM 161 222 383 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 161 222 383 10:00 PM 107 149 256 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 107 149 256 11:00 PM 53 89 142 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53 89 142 Total 8,667 8,520 17,187 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8,667 8,520 17,187 Percent 50% 50% - - - - - - - - - - - - 50% 50%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 672 541 1,213 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 672 541 1,213 PM Peak 17:00 16:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 734 778 1,493 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 734 778 1,493
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Reservation Road, California Avenue to Salinas Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 10
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 37 21 58 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 21 58 1:00 AM 21 23 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 23 44 2:00 AM 17 10 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 10 27 3:00 AM 11 13 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 13 24 4:00 AM 34 31 65 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34 31 65 5:00 AM 101 99 200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 101 99 200 6:00 AM 255 435 690 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 255 435 690 7:00 AM 558 717 1,275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 558 717 1,275 8:00 AM 515 577 1,092 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 515 577 1,092 9:00 AM 332 428 760 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 332 428 760 10:00 AM 337 299 636 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 337 299 636 11:00 AM 399 407 806 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 399 407 806 12:00 PM 446 419 865 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 446 419 865 1:00 PM 471 408 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 471 408 879 2:00 PM 567 478 1,045 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 567 478 1,045 3:00 PM 727 495 1,222 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 727 495 1,222 4:00 PM 723 612 1,335 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 723 612 1,335 5:00 PM 615 652 1,267 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 615 652 1,267 6:00 PM 420 373 793 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 420 373 793 7:00 PM 294 215 509 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 294 215 509 8:00 PM 240 197 437 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 240 197 437 9:00 PM 188 138 326 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 188 138 326 10:00 PM 138 91 229 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 138 91 229 11:00 PM 76 39 115 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 39 115 Total 7,522 7,177 14,699 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7,522 7,177 14,699 Percent 51% 49% - - - - - - - - - - - - 51% 49%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 558 717 1,275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 558 717 1,275 PM Peak 15:00 17:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 17:00 16:00 Vol. 727 652 1,335 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 727 652 1,335
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Reservation Road, Salinas Avenue to Imjin Parkway Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 11
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 38 36 74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 38 36 74 1:00 AM 19 23 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 23 42 2:00 AM 17 12 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 12 29 3:00 AM 12 13 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 13 25 4:00 AM 36 38 74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 38 74 5:00 AM 94 132 226 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 94 132 226 6:00 AM 288 490 778 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 288 490 778 7:00 AM 586 875 1,461 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 586 875 1,461 8:00 AM 565 693 1,258 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 565 693 1,258 9:00 AM 344 510 854 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 344 510 854 10:00 AM 321 374 695 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 321 374 695 11:00 AM 403 477 880 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 403 477 880 12:00 PM 441 456 897 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 441 456 897 1:00 PM 510 463 973 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 510 463 973 2:00 PM 567 541 1,108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 567 541 1,108 3:00 PM 683 597 1,280 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 683 597 1,280 4:00 PM 716 707 1,423 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 716 707 1,423 5:00 PM 617 741 1,358 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 617 741 1,358 6:00 PM 427 440 867 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 427 440 867 7:00 PM 282 261 543 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 282 261 543 8:00 PM 237 228 465 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 237 228 465 9:00 PM 183 166 349 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 183 166 349 10:00 PM 133 102 235 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 133 102 235 11:00 PM 74 59 133 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 74 59 133 Total 7,593 8,434 16,027 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7,593 8,434 16,027 Percent 47% 53% - - - - - - - - - - - - 47% 53%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 586 875 1,461 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 586 875 1,461 PM Peak 16:00 17:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 17:00 16:00 Vol. 716 741 1,423 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 716 741 1,423
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Reservation Road, Imjin Parkway to Blanco Road Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 12
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 76 60 136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 60 136 1:00 AM 47 36 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 36 83 2:00 AM 30 28 58 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 28 58 3:00 AM 23 60 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 60 83 4:00 AM 53 138 191 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53 138 191 5:00 AM 139 358 497 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 139 358 497 6:00 AM 408 1,214 1,622 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 408 1,214 1,622 7:00 AM 984 1,406 2,390 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 984 1,406 2,390 8:00 AM 898 1,248 2,146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 898 1,248 2,146 9:00 AM 669 1,032 1,701 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 669 1,032 1,701 10:00 AM 637 805 1,442 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 637 805 1,442 11:00 AM 757 860 1,617 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 757 860 1,617 12:00 PM 918 828 1,746 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 918 828 1,746 1:00 PM 954 852 1,806 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 954 852 1,806 2:00 PM 1,144 912 2,056 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,144 912 2,056 3:00 PM 1,385 954 2,339 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,385 954 2,339 4:00 PM 1,451 1,071 2,522 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,451 1,071 2,522 5:00 PM 1,377 1,152 2,529 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,377 1,152 2,529 6:00 PM 962 732 1,694 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 962 732 1,694 7:00 PM 691 471 1,162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 691 471 1,162 8:00 PM 591 380 971 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 591 380 971 9:00 PM 432 283 715 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 432 283 715 10:00 PM 290 185 475 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 290 185 475 11:00 PM 191 113 304 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 191 113 304 Total 15,107 15,178 30,285 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15,107 15,178 30,285 Percent 50% 50% - - - - - - - - - - - - 50% 50%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 984 1,406 2,390 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 984 1,406 2,390 PM Peak 16:00 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 1,451 1,152 2,529 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,451 1,152 2,529
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: 8th Street, 2nd Avenue to 3rd Avenue
Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 13
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 1:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 2:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 3:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 4:00 AM 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 5:00 AM 1 4 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 4 5 6:00 AM 3 32 35 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 32 35 7:00 AM 13 289 302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 289 302 8:00 AM 17 95 112 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 95 112 9:00 AM 14 38 52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 38 52 10:00 AM 12 21 33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 21 33 11:00 AM 14 19 33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 19 33 12:00 PM 17 33 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 33 50 1:00 PM 16 20 36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 20 36 2:00 PM 29 24 53 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 24 53 3:00 PM 37 19 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 19 56 4:00 PM 50 29 79 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50 29 79 5:00 PM 52 31 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52 31 83 6:00 PM 23 15 38 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 15 38 7:00 PM 12 7 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 7 19 8:00 PM 16 4 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 4 20 9:00 PM 5 4 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 4 9 10:00 PM 5 1 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 11:00 PM 4 5 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 5 9 Total 343 694 1,037 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 343 694 1,037 Percent 33% 67% - - - - - - - - - - - - 33% 67%
AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 17 289 302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 289 302 PM Peak 17:00 12:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 12:00 17:00 Vol. 52 33 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52 33 83
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: 8th Street, 5th Avenue to Inter-Garrison Road Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 14
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 16 6 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 6 22 1:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 2:00 AM 2 1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 3 3:00 AM 1 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 4 4:00 AM 5 5 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 5 10 5:00 AM 4 11 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 11 15 6:00 AM 19 59 78 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 59 78 7:00 AM 23 445 468 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 445 468 8:00 AM 57 228 285 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 228 285 9:00 AM 82 236 318 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 82 236 318 10:00 AM 82 112 194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 82 112 194 11:00 AM 167 168 335 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 167 168 335 12:00 PM 129 108 237 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 129 108 237 1:00 PM 169 155 324 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 169 155 324 2:00 PM 148 94 242 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 148 94 242 3:00 PM 207 151 358 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 207 151 358 4:00 PM 198 80 278 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 198 80 278 5:00 PM 208 112 320 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 208 112 320 6:00 PM 168 77 245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 168 77 245 7:00 PM 129 59 188 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 129 59 188 8:00 PM 93 45 138 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 93 45 138 9:00 PM 70 39 109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 70 39 109 10:00 PM 48 34 82 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 34 82 11:00 PM 22 19 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 19 41 Total 2,047 2,248 4,295 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,047 2,248 4,295 Percent 48% 52% - - - - - - - - - - - - 48% 52%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 167 445 468 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 167 445 468 PM Peak 17:00 13:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 13:00 15:00 Vol. 208 155 358 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 208 155 358
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: 9th Street, 1st Avenue to 2nd Avenue
Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 15
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 1:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 2:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 4:00 AM 2 0 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 0 2 5:00 AM 15 4 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 4 19 6:00 AM 130 5 135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 130 5 135 7:00 AM 184 32 216 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 184 32 216 8:00 AM 140 41 181 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 140 41 181 9:00 AM 122 77 199 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 122 77 199 10:00 AM 126 107 233 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 126 107 233 11:00 AM 115 142 257 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 115 142 257 12:00 PM 120 135 255 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 120 135 255 1:00 PM 106 79 185 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 106 79 185 2:00 PM 82 102 184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 82 102 184 3:00 PM 59 169 228 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 169 228 4:00 PM 58 162 220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 58 162 220 5:00 PM 27 48 75 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 48 75 6:00 PM 19 25 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 25 44 7:00 PM 18 8 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 8 26 8:00 PM 18 13 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 13 31 9:00 PM 12 6 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 6 18 10:00 PM 6 5 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 5 11 11:00 PM 5 2 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 2 7 Total 1,365 1,163 2,528 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,365 1,163 2,528 Percent 54% 46% - - - - - - - - - - - - 54% 46%
AM Peak 07:00 11:00 11:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 11:00 11:00 Vol. 184 142 257 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 184 142 257 PM Peak 12:00 15:00 12:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12:00 15:00 12:00 Vol. 120 169 255 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 120 169 255
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: 2nd Avenue, Divarty Street to 8th Street
Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 16
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 3 10 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 10 13 1:00 AM 2 3 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 3 5 2:00 AM 5 3 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 3 8 3:00 AM 2 3 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 3 5 4:00 AM 3 8 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 8 11 5:00 AM 7 15 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 15 22 6:00 AM 31 113 144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 113 144 7:00 AM 109 715 824 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 109 715 824 8:00 AM 142 471 613 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 142 471 613 9:00 AM 154 232 386 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 154 232 386 10:00 AM 141 218 359 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 141 218 359 11:00 AM 235 273 508 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 235 273 508 12:00 PM 230 325 555 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 230 325 555 1:00 PM 228 319 547 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 228 319 547 2:00 PM 219 261 480 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 219 261 480 3:00 PM 303 301 604 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 303 301 604 4:00 PM 319 342 661 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 319 342 661 5:00 PM 341 270 611 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 341 270 611 6:00 PM 215 266 481 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 215 266 481 7:00 PM 133 129 262 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 133 129 262 8:00 PM 109 95 204 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 109 95 204 9:00 PM 69 70 139 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69 70 139 10:00 PM 40 49 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40 49 89 11:00 PM 16 26 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 26 42 Total 3,056 4,517 7,573 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,056 4,517 7,573 Percent 40% 60% - - - - - - - - - - - - 40% 60%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 235 715 824 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 235 715 824 PM Peak 17:00 16:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 341 342 661 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 341 342 661
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: 2nd Avenue, 8th Street to Imjin Parkway
Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 17
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 5 10 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 10 15 1:00 AM 2 5 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 5 7 2:00 AM 5 3 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 3 8 3:00 AM 8 0 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 0 8 4:00 AM 7 7 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 7 14 5:00 AM 17 25 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 25 42 6:00 AM 31 171 202 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 171 202 7:00 AM 124 499 623 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 124 499 623 8:00 AM 141 416 557 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 141 416 557 9:00 AM 210 246 456 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 210 246 456 10:00 AM 229 219 448 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 229 219 448 11:00 AM 355 270 625 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 355 270 625 12:00 PM 357 291 648 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 357 291 648 1:00 PM 331 314 645 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 331 314 645 2:00 PM 329 252 581 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 329 252 581 3:00 PM 462 288 750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 462 288 750 4:00 PM 417 255 672 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 417 255 672 5:00 PM 378 239 617 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 378 239 617 6:00 PM 251 229 480 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 251 229 480 7:00 PM 175 162 337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 175 162 337 8:00 PM 141 104 245 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 141 104 245 9:00 PM 79 90 169 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 79 90 169 10:00 PM 46 66 112 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46 66 112 11:00 PM 21 24 45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 24 45 Total 4,121 4,185 8,306 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4,121 4,185 8,306 Percent 50% 50% - - - - - - - - - - - - 50% 50%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 11:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 11:00 Vol. 355 499 625 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 355 499 625 PM Peak 15:00 13:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 13:00 15:00 Vol. 462 314 750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 462 314 750
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Beach Road, Reservation Road to Del Monte Boulevard Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 18
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 11 14 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 14 25 1:00 AM 8 8 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 8 16 2:00 AM 5 6 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 6 11 3:00 AM 19 3 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 3 22 4:00 AM 27 3 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 3 30 5:00 AM 79 20 99 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 79 20 99 6:00 AM 153 59 212 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 153 59 212 7:00 AM 263 128 391 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 263 128 391 8:00 AM 223 119 342 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 223 119 342 9:00 AM 180 116 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 180 116 296 10:00 AM 183 126 309 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 183 126 309 11:00 AM 211 159 370 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 211 159 370 12:00 PM 216 178 394 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 216 178 394 1:00 PM 230 173 403 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 230 173 403 2:00 PM 292 193 485 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 292 193 485 3:00 PM 261 232 493 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 261 232 493 4:00 PM 274 257 531 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 274 257 531 5:00 PM 242 241 483 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 242 241 483 6:00 PM 178 153 331 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 178 153 331 7:00 PM 144 123 267 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 144 123 267 8:00 PM 106 105 211 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 106 105 211 9:00 PM 82 73 155 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 82 73 155 10:00 PM 44 45 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 45 89 11:00 PM 23 24 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 24 47 Total 3,454 2,558 6,012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,454 2,558 6,012 Percent 57% 43% - - - - - - - - - - - - 57% 43%
AM Peak 07:00 11:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 11:00 07:00 Vol. 263 159 391 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 263 159 391 PM Peak 14:00 16:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 292 257 531 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 292 257 531
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: De Forest Road, Beach Road to Reservation Road Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 19
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 5 2 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 2 7 1:00 AM 2 1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 3 2:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 3:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 4:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 5:00 AM 7 12 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 12 19 6:00 AM 17 27 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 27 44 7:00 AM 85 67 152 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 85 67 152 8:00 AM 47 88 135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 88 135 9:00 AM 33 39 72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33 39 72 10:00 AM 42 43 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42 43 85 11:00 AM 46 49 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46 49 95 12:00 PM 44 50 94 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 50 94 1:00 PM 72 79 151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 79 151 2:00 PM 77 70 147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 77 70 147 3:00 PM 57 73 130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 73 130 4:00 PM 87 75 162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 87 75 162 5:00 PM 95 72 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 95 72 167 6:00 PM 62 41 103 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 62 41 103 7:00 PM 32 31 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 31 63 8:00 PM 30 15 45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 15 45 9:00 PM 20 14 34 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 14 34 10:00 PM 13 7 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 7 20 11:00 PM 12 7 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 7 19 Total 887 862 1,749 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 887 862 1,749 Percent 51% 49% - - - - - - - - - - - - 51% 49%
AM Peak 07:00 08:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 08:00 07:00 Vol. 85 88 152 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 85 88 152 PM Peak 17:00 13:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 13:00 17:00 Vol. 95 79 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 95 79 167
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Crescent Avenue, Quebrada Del Mar to Reservation Road Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 20
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 1:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 2:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 3:00 AM 2 3 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 3 5 4:00 AM 3 4 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 4 7 5:00 AM 0 15 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 15 15 6:00 AM 9 37 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 37 46 7:00 AM 31 88 119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 88 119 8:00 AM 48 60 108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 60 108 9:00 AM 21 21 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 21 42 10:00 AM 32 26 58 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 26 58 11:00 AM 32 34 66 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 34 66 12:00 PM 48 35 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 35 83 1:00 PM 43 46 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 46 89 2:00 PM 47 55 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 55 102 3:00 PM 68 59 127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 68 59 127 4:00 PM 63 42 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 63 42 105 5:00 PM 65 24 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 65 24 89 6:00 PM 57 45 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 45 102 7:00 PM 42 21 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42 21 63 8:00 PM 36 14 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 14 50 9:00 PM 34 12 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34 12 46 10:00 PM 16 3 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 3 19 11:00 PM 5 2 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 2 7 Total 705 648 1,353 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 705 648 1,353 Percent 52% 48% - - - - - - - - - - - - 52% 48%
AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 48 88 119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 88 119 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 68 59 127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 68 59 127
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Crescent Avenue, Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 21
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 11 9 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 9 20 1:00 AM 3 6 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 6 9 2:00 AM 3 3 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 3 6 3:00 AM 4 7 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 7 11 4:00 AM 2 5 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 5 7 5:00 AM 14 18 32 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 18 32 6:00 AM 47 52 99 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 52 99 7:00 AM 157 125 282 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 157 125 282 8:00 AM 154 176 330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 154 176 330 9:00 AM 109 73 182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 109 73 182 10:00 AM 84 79 163 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 84 79 163 11:00 AM 74 88 162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 74 88 162 12:00 PM 111 80 191 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 111 80 191 1:00 PM 120 89 209 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 120 89 209 2:00 PM 116 123 239 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 116 123 239 3:00 PM 160 170 330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 160 170 330 4:00 PM 186 170 356 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 186 170 356 5:00 PM 159 122 281 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 159 122 281 6:00 PM 106 101 207 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 106 101 207 7:00 PM 74 59 133 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 74 59 133 8:00 PM 59 58 117 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 58 117 9:00 PM 43 41 84 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 41 84 10:00 PM 30 23 53 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 23 53 11:00 PM 12 13 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 13 25 Total 1,838 1,690 3,528 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,838 1,690 3,528 Percent 52% 48% - - - - - - - - - - - - 52% 48%
AM Peak 07:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 157 176 330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 157 176 330 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 15:00 16:00 Vol. 186 170 356 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 186 170 356
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Cardoza Avenue, Reservation Road to Aaron Way (End) Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 22
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 2 3 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 3 5 1:00 AM 3 2 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 2 5 2:00 AM 2 3 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 3 5 3:00 AM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 4:00 AM 0 6 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 6 6 5:00 AM 3 23 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 23 26 6:00 AM 23 79 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 79 102 7:00 AM 60 158 218 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 60 158 218 8:00 AM 52 80 132 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52 80 132 9:00 AM 49 69 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 49 69 118 10:00 AM 63 83 146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 63 83 146 11:00 AM 67 77 144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 67 77 144 12:00 PM 84 70 154 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 84 70 154 1:00 PM 70 76 146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 70 76 146 2:00 PM 98 75 173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 98 75 173 3:00 PM 106 87 193 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 106 87 193 4:00 PM 146 89 235 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 146 89 235 5:00 PM 136 96 232 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 136 96 232 6:00 PM 95 43 138 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 95 43 138 7:00 PM 54 24 78 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 24 78 8:00 PM 57 40 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 40 97 9:00 PM 33 32 65 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33 32 65 10:00 PM 16 10 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 10 26 11:00 PM 10 1 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 1 11 Total 1,230 1,228 2,458 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,230 1,228 2,458 Percent 50% 50% - - - - - - - - - - - - 50% 50%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 67 158 218 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 67 158 218 PM Peak 16:00 17:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 17:00 16:00 Vol. 146 96 235 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 146 96 235
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Beach Road, Del Monte Boulevard to De Forest Road Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 23
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 3 6 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 6 9 1:00 AM 3 1 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 1 4 2:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 3:00 AM 4 1 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 1 5 4:00 AM 9 0 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 0 9 5:00 AM 23 3 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 3 26 6:00 AM 45 28 73 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 45 28 73 7:00 AM 72 130 202 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 130 202 8:00 AM 51 123 174 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 51 123 174 9:00 AM 55 47 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 47 102 10:00 AM 54 54 108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 54 108 11:00 AM 59 80 139 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 80 139 12:00 PM 64 92 156 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64 92 156 1:00 PM 64 117 181 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64 117 181 2:00 PM 74 117 191 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 74 117 191 3:00 PM 100 168 268 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 168 268 4:00 PM 81 175 256 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 81 175 256 5:00 PM 94 136 230 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 94 136 230 6:00 PM 77 87 164 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 77 87 164 7:00 PM 37 65 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 65 102 8:00 PM 36 40 76 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 40 76 9:00 PM 32 37 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 37 69 10:00 PM 9 24 33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 24 33 11:00 PM 7 13 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 13 20 Total 1,054 1,544 2,598 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,054 1,544 2,598 Percent 41% 59% - - - - - - - - - - - - 41% 59%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 72 130 202 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 130 202 PM Peak 15:00 16:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 16:00 15:00 Vol. 100 175 268 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 175 268
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: California Avenue, Reservation Road to Carmel Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 24
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 10 9 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 9 19 1:00 AM 7 4 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 4 11 2:00 AM 2 4 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4 6 3:00 AM 3 2 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 2 5 4:00 AM 12 10 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 10 22 5:00 AM 29 21 50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 21 50 6:00 AM 116 64 180 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 116 64 180 7:00 AM 390 167 557 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 390 167 557 8:00 AM 277 177 454 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 277 177 454 9:00 AM 177 123 300 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 177 123 300 10:00 AM 152 111 263 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 152 111 263 11:00 AM 178 156 334 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 178 156 334 12:00 PM 217 151 368 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 217 151 368 1:00 PM 215 148 363 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 215 148 363 2:00 PM 261 202 463 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 261 202 463 3:00 PM 259 243 502 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 259 243 502 4:00 PM 283 239 522 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 283 239 522 5:00 PM 281 196 477 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 281 196 477 6:00 PM 196 136 332 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 196 136 332 7:00 PM 123 110 233 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 123 110 233 8:00 PM 91 73 164 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 91 73 164 9:00 PM 64 41 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64 41 105 10:00 PM 29 35 64 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 35 64 11:00 PM 31 17 48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 17 48 Total 3,403 2,439 5,842 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,403 2,439 5,842 Percent 58% 42% - - - - - - - - - - - - 58% 42%
AM Peak 07:00 08:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 08:00 07:00 Vol. 390 177 557 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 390 177 557 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 15:00 16:00 Vol. 283 243 522 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 283 243 522
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: California Avenue, Carmel Avenue to Reindollar Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 25
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 11 14 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 14 25 1:00 AM 8 7 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 7 15 2:00 AM 2 4 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4 6 3:00 AM 5 2 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 2 7 4:00 AM 13 7 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 7 20 5:00 AM 39 14 53 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 14 53 6:00 AM 136 48 184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 136 48 184 7:00 AM 414 217 631 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 414 217 631 8:00 AM 294 184 478 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 294 184 478 9:00 AM 203 128 331 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 203 128 331 10:00 AM 177 118 295 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 177 118 295 11:00 AM 194 154 348 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 194 154 348 12:00 PM 236 185 421 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 236 185 421 1:00 PM 230 178 408 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 230 178 408 2:00 PM 250 232 482 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 250 232 482 3:00 PM 270 287 557 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 270 287 557 4:00 PM 282 285 567 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 282 285 567 5:00 PM 300 253 553 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 300 253 553 6:00 PM 204 158 362 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 204 158 362 7:00 PM 115 124 239 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 115 124 239 8:00 PM 80 98 178 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80 98 178 9:00 PM 72 59 131 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 59 131 10:00 PM 27 50 77 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 50 77 11:00 PM 31 31 62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 31 62 Total 3,593 2,837 6,430 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,593 2,837 6,430 Percent 56% 44% - - - - - - - - - - - - 56% 44%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 414 217 631 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 414 217 631 PM Peak 17:00 15:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 15:00 16:00 Vol. 300 287 567 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 300 287 567
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: California Avenue, Reindollar Avenue to Imjin Parkway Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 26
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 22 15 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 15 37 1:00 AM 7 12 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 12 19 2:00 AM 6 5 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 5 11 3:00 AM 2 11 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 11 13 4:00 AM 7 28 35 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 28 35 5:00 AM 13 70 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 70 83 6:00 AM 40 213 253 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40 213 253 7:00 AM 253 688 941 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 253 688 941 8:00 AM 222 478 700 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 222 478 700 9:00 AM 138 293 431 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 138 293 431 10:00 AM 146 244 390 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 146 244 390 11:00 AM 187 250 437 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 187 250 437 12:00 PM 259 293 552 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 259 293 552 1:00 PM 237 287 524 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 237 287 524 2:00 PM 321 358 679 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 321 358 679 3:00 PM 362 377 739 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 362 377 739 4:00 PM 359 313 672 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 359 313 672 5:00 PM 394 356 750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 394 356 750 6:00 PM 257 229 486 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 257 229 486 7:00 PM 189 148 337 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 189 148 337 8:00 PM 153 103 256 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 153 103 256 9:00 PM 108 81 189 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 108 81 189 10:00 PM 83 34 117 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 83 34 117 11:00 PM 47 27 74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 27 74 Total 3,812 4,913 8,725 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3,812 4,913 8,725 Percent 44% 56% - - - - - - - - - - - - 44% 56%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 253 688 941 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 253 688 941 PM Peak 17:00 15:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 15:00 17:00 Vol. 394 377 750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 394 377 750
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: California Avenue, Imjin Parkway to 8th Street Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 27
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 1:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 3:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 4:00 AM 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 5:00 AM 3 2 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 2 5 6:00 AM 12 17 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 17 29 7:00 AM 22 78 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 78 100 8:00 AM 13 31 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 31 44 9:00 AM 24 36 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 36 60 10:00 AM 28 34 62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 34 62 11:00 AM 37 34 71 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 34 71 12:00 PM 20 28 48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 28 48 1:00 PM 35 23 58 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 35 23 58 2:00 PM 21 35 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 35 56 3:00 PM 44 65 109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 65 109 4:00 PM 30 31 61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 31 61 5:00 PM 24 38 62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 38 62 6:00 PM 10 19 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 19 29 7:00 PM 6 18 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 18 24 8:00 PM 8 6 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 6 14 9:00 PM 2 9 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 9 11 10:00 PM 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 11:00 PM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 Total 343 508 851 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 343 508 851 Percent 40% 60% - - - - - - - - - - - - 40% 60%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 37 78 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 78 100 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 44 65 109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 65 109
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Reindollar Avenue, Del Monte Boulevard to California Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 28
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 4 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 4 8 1:00 AM 3 2 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 2 5 2:00 AM 2 2 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 2 4 3:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 4:00 AM 2 11 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 11 13 5:00 AM 8 21 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 21 29 6:00 AM 13 98 111 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 98 111 7:00 AM 146 168 314 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 146 168 314 8:00 AM 155 243 398 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 155 243 398 9:00 AM 76 110 186 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 110 186 10:00 AM 59 81 140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 81 140 11:00 AM 78 87 165 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 78 87 165 12:00 PM 93 74 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 93 74 167 1:00 PM 93 86 179 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 93 86 179 2:00 PM 104 104 208 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 104 104 208 3:00 PM 185 164 349 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 185 164 349 4:00 PM 166 120 286 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 166 120 286 5:00 PM 159 121 280 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 159 121 280 6:00 PM 121 82 203 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 121 82 203 7:00 PM 68 39 107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 68 39 107 8:00 PM 61 29 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 61 29 90 9:00 PM 30 26 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 26 56 10:00 PM 26 26 52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 26 52 11:00 PM 11 10 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 10 21 Total 1,664 1,708 3,372 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,664 1,708 3,372 Percent 49% 51% - - - - - - - - - - - - 49% 51%
AM Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 155 243 398 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 155 243 398 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 185 164 349 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 185 164 349
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Reindollar Avenue, California Avenue to Carmel Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 29
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 8 4 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 4 12 1:00 AM 1 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 4 2:00 AM 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 3:00 AM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 4:00 AM 1 6 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 6 7 5:00 AM 7 9 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 9 16 6:00 AM 13 44 57 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 44 57 7:00 AM 31 196 227 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 196 227 8:00 AM 35 115 150 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 35 115 150 9:00 AM 22 61 83 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 61 83 10:00 AM 39 39 78 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 39 78 11:00 AM 42 55 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42 55 97 12:00 PM 44 41 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 41 85 1:00 PM 42 43 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42 43 85 2:00 PM 58 71 129 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 58 71 129 3:00 PM 60 52 112 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 60 52 112 4:00 PM 59 57 116 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 57 116 5:00 PM 79 57 136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 79 57 136 6:00 PM 53 39 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53 39 92 7:00 PM 41 25 66 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 25 66 8:00 PM 43 21 64 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 21 64 9:00 PM 24 16 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 16 40 10:00 PM 14 3 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 3 17 11:00 PM 7 5 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 5 12 Total 725 965 1,690 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 725 965 1,690 Percent 43% 57% - - - - - - - - - - - - 43% 57%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 42 196 227 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42 196 227 PM Peak 17:00 14:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 14:00 17:00 Vol. 79 71 136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 79 71 136
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Carmel Avenue, Del Monte Boulevard to California Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 30
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 4 8 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 8 12 1:00 AM 5 1 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 1 6 2:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 3:00 AM 1 8 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 8 9 4:00 AM 4 7 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 7 11 5:00 AM 1 12 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 12 13 6:00 AM 16 52 68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 52 68 7:00 AM 235 137 372 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 235 137 372 8:00 AM 128 183 311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 128 183 311 9:00 AM 68 73 141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 68 73 141 10:00 AM 74 70 144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 74 70 144 11:00 AM 72 119 191 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 119 191 12:00 PM 107 94 201 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 107 94 201 1:00 PM 142 111 253 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 142 111 253 2:00 PM 183 203 386 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 183 203 386 3:00 PM 174 171 345 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 174 171 345 4:00 PM 192 146 338 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 192 146 338 5:00 PM 150 146 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 150 146 296 6:00 PM 103 101 204 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 103 101 204 7:00 PM 85 65 150 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 85 65 150 8:00 PM 54 34 88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 34 88 9:00 PM 61 26 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 61 26 87 10:00 PM 29 17 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 17 46 11:00 PM 16 15 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 15 31 Total 1,905 1,799 3,704 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,905 1,799 3,704 Percent 51% 49% - - - - - - - - - - - - 51% 49%
AM Peak 07:00 08:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 08:00 07:00 Vol. 235 183 372 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 235 183 372 PM Peak 16:00 14:00 14:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 14:00 14:00 Vol. 192 203 386 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 192 203 386
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Carmel Avenue, California Avenue to Salinas Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 31
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 1:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 3:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 4:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 5:00 AM 6 0 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 0 6 6:00 AM 7 1 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 1 8 7:00 AM 55 67 122 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 67 122 8:00 AM 30 57 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 57 87 9:00 AM 16 17 33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 17 33 10:00 AM 15 14 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 14 29 11:00 AM 21 20 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 20 41 12:00 PM 18 14 32 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 14 32 1:00 PM 24 23 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 23 47 2:00 PM 37 85 122 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 85 122 3:00 PM 34 35 69 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34 35 69 4:00 PM 20 43 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 43 63 5:00 PM 23 29 52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 29 52 6:00 PM 15 16 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 16 31 7:00 PM 14 15 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 15 29 8:00 PM 6 9 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 9 15 9:00 PM 6 8 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 8 14 10:00 PM 1 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 4 11:00 PM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 Total 351 461 812 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 351 461 812 Percent 43% 57% - - - - - - - - - - - - 43% 57%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 55 67 122 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 67 122 PM Peak 14:00 14:00 14:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14:00 14:00 14:00 Vol. 37 85 122 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 85 122
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Salinas Avenue, Carmel Avenue to Reservation Road Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 32
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 1:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 2:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 3:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 5:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 6:00 AM 3 7 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 7 10 7:00 AM 8 22 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 22 30 8:00 AM 7 10 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 10 17 9:00 AM 4 7 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 7 11 10:00 AM 7 5 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 5 12 11:00 AM 4 5 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 5 9 12:00 PM 4 8 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 8 12 1:00 PM 13 8 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 8 21 2:00 PM 18 12 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 12 30 3:00 PM 9 11 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 11 20 4:00 PM 13 11 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 11 24 5:00 PM 9 9 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 9 18 6:00 PM 6 11 17 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 11 17 7:00 PM 9 4 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 4 13 8:00 PM 3 0 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 0 3 9:00 PM 3 3 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 3 6 10:00 PM 3 0 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 0 3 11:00 PM 2 1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 3 Total 127 137 264 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 127 137 264 Percent 48% 52% - - - - - - - - - - - - 48% 52%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 8 22 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 22 30 PM Peak 14:00 14:00 14:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14:00 14:00 14:00 Vol. 18 12 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 12 30
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Paul Davis Drive, Healy Avenue to Marina Greens Drive Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 33
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 1:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 2:00 AM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 3:00 AM 2 0 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 0 2 4:00 AM 0 4 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 4 4 5:00 AM 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 6:00 AM 11 53 64 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 53 64 7:00 AM 32 42 74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 42 74 8:00 AM 15 30 45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 30 45 9:00 AM 16 20 36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 20 36 10:00 AM 17 22 39 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 22 39 11:00 AM 16 11 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 11 27 12:00 PM 28 28 56 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 28 56 1:00 PM 21 20 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 20 41 2:00 PM 19 24 43 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 24 43 3:00 PM 23 16 39 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 16 39 4:00 PM 45 30 75 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 45 30 75 5:00 PM 48 14 62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 14 62 6:00 PM 5 11 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 11 16 7:00 PM 2 4 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4 6 8:00 PM 1 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 5 6 9:00 PM 4 3 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 3 7 10:00 PM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 11:00 PM 3 2 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 2 5 Total 311 346 657 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 311 346 657 Percent 47% 53% - - - - - - - - - - - - 47% 53%
AM Peak 07:00 06:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 06:00 07:00 Vol. 32 53 74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 53 74 PM Peak 17:00 16:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 48 30 75 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 30 75
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Patton Parkway, Marina High School to California Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 34
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 1:00 AM 2 0 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 0 2 2:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 4:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 5:00 AM 2 0 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 0 2 6:00 AM 3 7 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 7 10 7:00 AM 25 39 64 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 39 64 8:00 AM 73 100 173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 73 100 173 9:00 AM 11 14 25 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 14 25 10:00 AM 9 7 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 7 16 11:00 AM 20 8 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 8 28 12:00 PM 14 10 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 14 10 24 1:00 PM 20 14 34 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 14 34 2:00 PM 27 14 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 14 41 3:00 PM 76 42 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 42 118 4:00 PM 15 12 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 12 27 5:00 PM 23 18 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 18 41 6:00 PM 11 10 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 10 21 7:00 PM 5 2 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 2 7 8:00 PM 12 2 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 2 14 9:00 PM 3 1 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 1 4 10:00 PM 4 2 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 2 6 11:00 PM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 Total 357 304 661 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 357 304 661 Percent 54% 46% - - - - - - - - - - - - 54% 46%
AM Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 73 100 173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 73 100 173 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 76 42 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 42 118
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Crescent Street, Patton Parkway to Reindollar Avenue Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 35
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 1:00 AM 0 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 2 2 2:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 3:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 4:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 5:00 AM 2 3 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 3 5 6:00 AM 5 9 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 9 14 7:00 AM 47 111 158 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 111 158 8:00 AM 195 212 407 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 195 212 407 9:00 AM 22 25 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 25 47 10:00 AM 15 15 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 15 30 11:00 AM 17 16 33 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 16 33 12:00 PM 19 21 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 19 21 40 1:00 PM 21 26 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 26 47 2:00 PM 35 33 68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 35 33 68 3:00 PM 116 94 210 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 116 94 210 4:00 PM 41 32 73 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 32 73 5:00 PM 41 31 72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 31 72 6:00 PM 24 22 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 22 46 7:00 PM 6 10 16 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 10 16 8:00 PM 12 6 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 6 18 9:00 PM 1 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 3 4 10:00 PM 3 4 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 4 7 11:00 PM 4 1 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 1 5 Total 626 678 1,304 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 626 678 1,304 Percent 48% 52% - - - - - - - - - - - - 48% 52%
AM Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 195 212 407 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 195 212 407 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 116 94 210 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 116 94 210
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Vaughn Avenue, Reindollar Avenue to Carmel Avenue Date Range: 12/12/2024 - 12/18/2024
Site Code: 36
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 5 0 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 0 5 1:00 AM 0 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 0 0 2:00 AM 0 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 2 2 3:00 AM 1 0 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 0 1 4:00 AM 3 5 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 5 8 5:00 AM 7 2 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 2 9 6:00 AM 5 22 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 22 27 7:00 AM 63 88 151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 63 88 151 8:00 AM 105 171 276 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 105 171 276 9:00 AM 23 35 58 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 35 58 10:00 AM 30 33 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 33 63 11:00 AM 36 25 61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 25 61 12:00 PM 31 30 61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 30 61 1:00 PM 30 37 67 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 37 67 2:00 PM 66 58 124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 66 58 124 3:00 PM 91 117 208 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 91 117 208 4:00 PM 62 54 116 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 62 54 116 5:00 PM 43 42 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 42 85 6:00 PM 34 36 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34 36 70 7:00 PM 22 23 45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 23 45 8:00 PM 18 12 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 12 30 9:00 PM 15 13 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 13 28 10:00 PM 7 6 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 6 13 11:00 PM 6 1 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 1 7 Total 703 812 1,515 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 703 812 1,515 Percent 46% 54% - - - - - - - - - - - - 46% 54%
AM Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 105 171 276 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 105 171 276 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 91 117 208 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 91 117 208
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Mid-Week Average12/18/202412/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 12/16/2024 12/17/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Seacrest Avenue, Carmel Avenue to Reservation Road Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 37
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 7 5 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 5 12 1:00 AM 1 5 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 5 6 2:00 AM 4 4 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 4 8 3:00 AM 2 3 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 3 5 4:00 AM 3 1 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 1 4 5:00 AM 15 11 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 11 26 6:00 AM 41 36 77 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 36 77 7:00 AM 87 80 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 87 80 167 8:00 AM 119 119 238 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 119 119 238 9:00 AM 102 101 203 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 102 101 203 10:00 AM 100 111 211 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 111 211 11:00 AM 111 112 223 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 111 112 223 12:00 PM 138 148 286 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 138 148 286 1:00 PM 138 145 283 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 138 145 283 2:00 PM 155 171 326 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 155 171 326 3:00 PM 180 196 376 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 180 196 376 4:00 PM 165 184 349 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 165 184 349 5:00 PM 190 193 383 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 190 193 383 6:00 PM 125 164 289 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 125 164 289 7:00 PM 89 131 220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 89 131 220 8:00 PM 68 79 147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 68 79 147 9:00 PM 42 54 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42 54 96 10:00 PM 11 18 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 18 29 11:00 PM 13 15 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 15 28 Total 1,906 2,086 3,992 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,906 2,086 3,992 Percent 48% 52% - - - - - - - - - - - - 48% 52%
AM Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 119 119 238 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 119 119 238 PM Peak 17:00 15:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 15:00 17:00 Vol. 190 196 383 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 190 196 383
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Sunset Avenue, Reindollar Avenue to Carmel Avenue Date Range: 12/12/2024 - 12/18/2024
Site Code: 38
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 6 6 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 6 12 1:00 AM 1 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 2 2:00 AM 5 3 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 3 8 3:00 AM 0 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 2 2 4:00 AM 3 8 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 8 11 5:00 AM 8 19 27 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 19 27 6:00 AM 28 61 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 61 89 7:00 AM 56 141 197 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 56 141 197 8:00 AM 105 142 247 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 105 142 247 9:00 AM 63 83 146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 63 83 146 10:00 AM 69 82 151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69 82 151 11:00 AM 80 107 187 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80 107 187 12:00 PM 66 97 163 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 66 97 163 1:00 PM 65 92 157 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 65 92 157 2:00 PM 87 85 172 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 87 85 172 3:00 PM 166 144 310 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 166 144 310 4:00 PM 120 110 230 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 120 110 230 5:00 PM 127 140 267 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 127 140 267 6:00 PM 72 91 163 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 91 163 7:00 PM 44 49 93 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 49 93 8:00 PM 30 44 74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 44 74 9:00 PM 34 40 74 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34 40 74 10:00 PM 25 27 52 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 27 52 11:00 PM 13 7 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 13 7 20 Total 1,273 1,581 2,854 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,273 1,581 2,854 Percent 45% 55% - - - - - - - - - - - - 45% 55%
AM Peak 08:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 105 142 247 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 105 142 247 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 166 144 310 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 166 144 310
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Mid-Week Average12/18/202412/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 12/16/2024 12/17/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Lake Drive, Palm Avenue to Reservation Road
Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 39
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 5 3 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 3 8 1:00 AM 2 1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 3 2:00 AM 1 2 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2 3 3:00 AM 3 2 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 2 5 4:00 AM 2 4 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 4 6 5:00 AM 11 15 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 15 26 6:00 AM 18 28 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 28 46 7:00 AM 39 82 121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 82 121 8:00 AM 54 69 123 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 69 123 9:00 AM 28 44 72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 44 72 10:00 AM 25 30 55 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 30 55 11:00 AM 47 42 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 47 42 89 12:00 PM 39 49 88 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 49 88 1:00 PM 42 39 81 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 42 39 81 2:00 PM 55 57 112 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 57 112 3:00 PM 63 64 127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 63 64 127 4:00 PM 56 77 133 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 56 77 133 5:00 PM 54 66 120 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 66 120 6:00 PM 45 52 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 45 52 97 7:00 PM 41 34 75 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 41 34 75 8:00 PM 31 29 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 29 60 9:00 PM 20 16 36 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 16 36 10:00 PM 10 12 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 12 22 11:00 PM 7 6 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 6 13 Total 698 823 1,521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 698 823 1,521 Percent 46% 54% - - - - - - - - - - - - 46% 54%
AM Peak 08:00 07:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 07:00 08:00 Vol. 54 82 123 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 82 123 PM Peak 15:00 16:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 16:00 16:00 Vol. 63 77 133 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 63 77 133
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Palm Avenue, Lake Drive to Del Monte Boulevard Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 40
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 3 11 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 11 14 1:00 AM 5 5 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 5 10 2:00 AM 4 1 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 1 5 3:00 AM 3 2 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 2 5 4:00 AM 8 0 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8 0 8 5:00 AM 28 6 34 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 6 34 6:00 AM 77 12 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 77 12 89 7:00 AM 173 64 237 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 173 64 237 8:00 AM 153 138 291 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 153 138 291 9:00 AM 70 41 111 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 70 41 111 10:00 AM 69 49 118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69 49 118 11:00 AM 101 100 201 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 101 100 201 12:00 PM 81 66 147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 81 66 147 1:00 PM 80 75 155 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80 75 155 2:00 PM 105 134 239 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 105 134 239 3:00 PM 110 144 254 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 110 144 254 4:00 PM 102 135 237 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 102 135 237 5:00 PM 90 133 223 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 90 133 223 6:00 PM 63 88 151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 63 88 151 7:00 PM 34 78 112 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34 78 112 8:00 PM 29 72 101 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 72 101 9:00 PM 17 41 58 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 41 58 10:00 PM 18 29 47 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 29 47 11:00 PM 10 21 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 21 31 Total 1,433 1,445 2,878 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,433 1,445 2,878 Percent 50% 50% - - - - - - - - - - - - 50% 50%
AM Peak 07:00 08:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 08:00 08:00 Vol. 173 138 291 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 173 138 291 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 110 144 254 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 110 144 254
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Abrams Drive, Preston Drive to Imjin Parkway
Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 41
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 5 15 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 15 20 1:00 AM 6 1 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 1 7 2:00 AM 2 6 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 6 8 3:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 4:00 AM 3 10 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 10 13 5:00 AM 10 16 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 16 26 6:00 AM 65 42 107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 65 42 107 7:00 AM 70 131 201 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 70 131 201 8:00 AM 71 79 150 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 71 79 150 9:00 AM 54 83 137 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 83 137 10:00 AM 48 73 121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 73 121 11:00 AM 53 74 127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53 74 127 12:00 PM 55 91 146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 55 91 146 1:00 PM 59 75 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 75 134 2:00 PM 69 100 169 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 69 100 169 3:00 PM 64 156 220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64 156 220 4:00 PM 70 142 212 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 70 142 212 5:00 PM 75 94 169 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 75 94 169 6:00 PM 57 67 124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 67 124 7:00 PM 44 27 71 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 27 71 8:00 PM 44 41 85 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 41 85 9:00 PM 25 26 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 26 51 10:00 PM 17 14 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 14 31 11:00 PM 12 18 30 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 18 30 Total 978 1,382 2,360 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 978 1,382 2,360 Percent 41% 59% - - - - - - - - - - - - 41% 59%
AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 71 131 201 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 71 131 201 PM Peak 17:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 75 156 220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 75 156 220
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Preston Drive, Abrams Drive to Imjin Parkway
Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 42
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 11 10 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 10 21 1:00 AM 3 1 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 1 4 2:00 AM 3 5 8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 5 8 3:00 AM 0 3 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 3 3 4:00 AM 4 10 14 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 10 14 5:00 AM 2 22 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 22 24 6:00 AM 7 65 72 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 65 72 7:00 AM 32 187 219 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 187 219 8:00 AM 36 88 124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 88 124 9:00 AM 39 70 109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 70 109 10:00 AM 30 52 82 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 52 82 11:00 AM 34 63 97 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34 63 97 12:00 PM 39 64 103 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 64 103 1:00 PM 46 63 109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46 63 109 2:00 PM 60 82 142 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 60 82 142 3:00 PM 77 98 175 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 77 98 175 4:00 PM 103 91 194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 103 91 194 5:00 PM 82 76 158 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 82 76 158 6:00 PM 79 65 144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 79 65 144 7:00 PM 54 39 93 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54 39 93 8:00 PM 51 28 79 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 51 28 79 9:00 PM 36 25 61 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 25 61 10:00 PM 29 17 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 17 46 11:00 PM 17 12 29 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 12 29 Total 874 1,236 2,110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 874 1,236 2,110 Percent 41% 59% - - - - - - - - - - - - 41% 59%
AM Peak 09:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 09:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 39 187 219 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 187 219 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 16:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 15:00 16:00 Vol. 103 98 194 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 103 98 194
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: 3rd Avenue, Imjin Parkway to 8th Street
Date Range: 12/12/2024 - 12/18/2024
Site Code: 43
NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total NB SB Total 12:00 AM 0 4 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 4 4 1:00 AM 3 1 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 1 4 2:00 AM 0 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 1 1 3:00 AM 2 1 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 1 3 4:00 AM 5 2 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 2 7 5:00 AM 3 4 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 4 7 6:00 AM 25 12 37 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 12 37 7:00 AM 32 59 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 59 91 8:00 AM 23 40 63 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 23 40 63 9:00 AM 28 21 49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 21 49 10:00 AM 29 28 57 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 28 57 11:00 AM 22 27 49 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 22 27 49 12:00 PM 27 28 55 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 27 28 55 1:00 PM 17 23 40 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 23 40 2:00 PM 30 37 67 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 30 37 67 3:00 PM 48 39 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48 39 87 4:00 PM 38 44 82 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 38 44 82 5:00 PM 52 53 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52 53 105 6:00 PM 28 34 62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 28 34 62 7:00 PM 17 27 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 27 44 8:00 PM 9 17 26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 17 26 9:00 PM 4 7 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 7 11 10:00 PM 7 14 21 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 14 21 11:00 PM 4 5 9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 5 9 Total 453 528 981 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 453 528 981 Percent 46% 54% - - - - - - - - - - - - 46% 54%
AM Peak 07:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 07:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 32 59 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 32 59 91 PM Peak 17:00 17:00 17:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17:00 17:00 17:00 Vol. 52 53 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52 53 105
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Mid-Week Average12/18/202412/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 12/16/2024 12/17/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Abrams Drive, Imjin Pkwy (west) to Preston Drive Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 44
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 12 0 12 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 12 0 12 1:00 AM 0 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 2 2 2:00 AM 4 2 6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 2 6 3:00 AM 0 3 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 3 3 4:00 AM 4 14 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 14 18 5:00 AM 2 22 24 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 22 24 6:00 AM 36 90 126 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 90 126 7:00 AM 46 178 224 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46 178 224 8:00 AM 62 114 176 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 62 114 176 9:00 AM 57 65 122 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 65 122 10:00 AM 49 55 104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 49 55 104 11:00 AM 64 70 134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64 70 134 12:00 PM 75 83 158 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 75 83 158 1:00 PM 68 71 139 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 68 71 139 2:00 PM 81 88 169 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 81 88 169 3:00 PM 156 109 265 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 156 109 265 4:00 PM 174 73 247 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 174 73 247 5:00 PM 147 85 232 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 147 85 232 6:00 PM 100 58 158 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 100 58 158 7:00 PM 72 33 105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72 33 105 8:00 PM 71 25 96 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 71 25 96 9:00 PM 53 20 73 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 53 20 73 10:00 PM 37 14 51 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 37 14 51 11:00 PM 18 5 23 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 5 23 Total 1,388 1,279 2,667 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,388 1,279 2,667 Percent 52% 48% - - - - - - - - - - - - 52% 48%
AM Peak 11:00 07:00 07:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11:00 07:00 07:00 Vol. 64 178 224 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64 178 224 PM Peak 16:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 174 109 265 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 174 109 265
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
Location: Marina Heights Drive, California Ave to Imjin Pkwy Date Range: 12/10/2024 - 12/16/2024
Site Code: 45
EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total EB WB Total 12:00 AM 6 4 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 4 10 1:00 AM 4 1 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 1 5 2:00 AM 0 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 2 2 3:00 AM 0 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 2 2 4:00 AM 0 3 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 3 3 5:00 AM 5 15 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 5 15 20 6:00 AM 21 44 65 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 44 65 7:00 AM 57 134 191 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 57 134 191 8:00 AM 89 123 212 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 89 123 212 9:00 AM 46 64 110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46 64 110 10:00 AM 44 60 104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 60 104 11:00 AM 59 60 119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 59 60 119 12:00 PM 81 86 167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 81 86 167 1:00 PM 93 91 184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 93 91 184 2:00 PM 98 100 198 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 98 100 198 3:00 PM 123 112 235 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 123 112 235 4:00 PM 110 87 197 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 110 87 197 5:00 PM 108 89 197 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 108 89 197 6:00 PM 86 60 146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 86 60 146 7:00 PM 50 37 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50 37 87 8:00 PM 36 19 55 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 19 55 9:00 PM 26 22 48 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 22 48 10:00 PM 16 15 31 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 16 15 31 11:00 PM 10 9 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 9 19 Total 1,168 1,239 2,407 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,168 1,239 2,407 Percent 49% 51% - - - - - - - - - - - - 49% 51%
AM Peak 08:00 07:00 08:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 08:00 07:00 08:00 Vol. 89 134 212 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 89 134 212 PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15:00 15:00 15:00 Vol. 123 112 235 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 123 112 235
1. Mid-week average includes data between Tuesday and Thursday.
Time
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday Monday Mid-Week Average12/16/202412/10/2024 12/11/2024 12/12/2024 12/13/2024 12/14/2024 12/15/2024 1 Project Manager: (415) 310-6469
[email protected]
May 1, 2025 Item No. 13c
Honorable Mayor and Members City Council Meeting
of the Marina City Council of May 6, 2025
CITY COUNCIL TO RECEIVE A PRESENTATION FROM KIMLEY-HORN
ENGINEERING ON RESULTS OF FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE
RESERVATION ROAD CORRIDOR. THIS STUDY EVALUATES THE
FEASIBILITY OF REPLACING TRAFFIC SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
WITH ROUNDABOUTS ALONG RESERVATION ROAD, SUPPORTING
THE CITY’S DOWNTOWN VITALIZATION EFFORTS.
REQUEST:
It is requested that the City Council:
1. Receive informational presentation from Kimley-Horn Engineering on the results of the Reservation Road Corridor Study. The study evaluates the feasibility of replacing traffic signalized intersections with roundabouts along Reservation Road, supporting the City’s downtown revitalization efforts.