Agenda packet — Mendota City Council, October 6, 2026 (part 4 of 5)

SELECT PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROJECT SITE
APPENDIX C:

SELECT PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE PROJECT SITE
39 40
Photo 1 (above): Representative photo of the site’s disked field. Photo 2 (below): Facing north along dirt access road on east side of project site; margin of disked field visible at left. ‘ ' .::..§f.3'»r F...'-‘ _'
Photo 1 (above): Representative photo of the site’s disked field. Photo 2 (below): Facing north along dirt access road on east side of project site; margin of disked field Visible at left. :15 77—-
"-?.k.-"-.-; . .,
. .- .._ 4W, -‘ . 3%- .. r2.-
40 41
Photo 3 (above). Facing east along proposed sewer main alignment. Drainage ditch visible at center and off-site residential development at right. Photo 4 (below): Facing east along proposed sewer main alignment. Off-site residential development visible at right.

Photo 3 (above). Facing east along proposed sewer main alignment. Drainage ditch Visible at center and off-site residential development at right. Photo 4 (below): Facing east along proposed sewer main alignment. Off-site residential development Visible at right. x:- x"
.f“ . #
"' '.3....
-:;.'..-F."
41 42
Photo 5. Facing south from proposed Amador Avenue alignment toward Belmont Avenue. -.Iwhfh::4-—h
Photo 5. Facing south from proposed Amador Avenue alignment toward Belmont Avenue. 42 Appendix
Appendix C - Cultural Records Search Summary

Appendix
Appendix C- Cultural RecordsSearchSummary
1391 W. Shaw Ave., Suite C
Fresno, CA 93711-3600
O: (559) 229-1856 | F: (559) 229-2019
www.appliedearthworks.com
CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT | ARCHAEOLOGY | ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY | PALEONTOLOGY | GIS October 21, 2025
Joseph Donald Crown
Joseph Crown Construction and Development, Inc.
5320 E. Pine Ave.

Fresno, CA 93727
(559) 275-5200
Sent via email to: [email protected]
RE: Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, Fresno County, California
Dear Mr. Crown:

At the request of Joseph Crown Construction and Development, Inc. (Crown Homes), Applied EarthWorks, Inc. (Æ) conducted a cultural resource records search at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (SSJVIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) in support of the Crown Homes Development in the city of Mendota, Fresno County, California. Crown Homes plans to build a single-family residential development with 271 homes on Assessor’s Parcel Number 012-190-25ST, (Project; Figures 1 and 2). The Project is in Sections 25 and 36 of Township 13 South, Range 14 East as depicted on the U.S. Geological Survey Firebaugh (1984) and Coit Ranch (1984), California topographic quadrangles.

This summary report does not satisfy the requirements of a cultural resources inventory per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended.

RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS
To obtain information on known archaeological sites and other historical resources that may be in or within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project area, Æ requested a records search at the SSJVIC of the CHRIS, housed at California State University, Bakersfield, on September 22, 2025. SSJVIC staff consulted archaeological site and survey base maps, reports of previous investigations, and records showing previous cultural studies and known cultural resources in the Project area and a surrounding 0.5-mile radius (Attachment 1).

Results from the records search were received on October 6, 2025 (Records Search File No. 25-393; Attachment 1). The SSJVIC identified no cultural resources in the Project area and three in the 0.5-mile radius. Additionally, two cultural resource studies have been conducted in the Project area and six outside of the Project area but within the 0.5-mile radius. 1391 W. Shaw Ave, Suite C
- Fresno, CA 93711—3600
Applled O: (559) 229—1856| F: (559) 229—2019
EARTHWORKS Inc. www.appliedearthworks.com
October 21, 2025
Joseph Donald Crown
Joseph Crown Construction and Development, Inc.
5320 E. Pine Ave.

Fresno, CA 93727
(559) 275-5200
Sent Via email to: [email protected]
RE: Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, Fresno County, California
Dear Mr. Crown:

At the request of Joseph Crown Construction and Development, Inc. (Crown Homes), Applied EarthWorks, Inc. (PE) conducted a cultural resource records search at the Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (SSJV1C) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) in support of the Crown Homes Development in the city of Mendota, Fresno County, California. Crown Homes plans to build a single—family residential development with 271 homes on Assessor’s Parcel Number 012-190-258T, (Project; Figures 1 and 2). The Project is in Sections 25 and 36 of Township 13 South, Range 14 East as depicted on the US. Geological Survey Firebaugh (1984) and Coit Ranch (1984), California topographic quadrangles.

RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS
To obtain information on known archaeological sites and other historical resources that may be in or Within a 0.5-mile radius of the Project area, PErequested a records search at the SSJVIC of the CHRIS, housed at California State University, Bakersfield, on September 22, 2025. SSJVIC staff consulted archaeological site and survey base maps, reports of previous investigations, and records showing previous cultural studies and known cultural resources in the Project area and a surrounding 0.5—mile radius (Attachment 1).

Results from the records search were received on October 6, 2025 (Records Search File No. 25—393; Attachment 1). The SSJVIC identified no cultural resources in the Project area and three in the 0.5—mile radius. Additionally, two cultural resource studies have been conducted in the Project area and six outside of the Project area but Within the 0.5-mile radius.

CULTURALRESOURCEMANAGEMENTI ARCHAEOLOGYI ARCHITECTURALHISTORYI PALEONTOLOGYI GIS Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, California Figure 1 Project location on USGS Firebaugh and Coit Ranch 7.5-minute topographic quadrangles. 0 0.5 1
Kilometers
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Feet
0 0.5 1
Miles
Scale: 1:24,000
o
Township 13S/Range 14E,
Sections 25, 36
Firebaugh (1984), Coit Ranch (1984)
CA 7.5' USGS Topographic
Quadrangles
jhaller 10/13/2025

PROJECT AREA
2 PROJECT VICINITY
Firebaugh
Coit Ranch
USGS Quad
Project Area
0 5 10 15 20
Miles
jhaller1 0/13/2025
I -"’--.' I I -. _‘. ‘- - 1'— y f
’ finallfli-:=-— F'X --' I i 7, a.‘ , k "‘I M ii]. i ' : “Am I... -' L- 1. x ..1_ 5 ‘~. .1, -_ PROJECTVICINITY r;
: \ .. '_- "I." Fifi _ *4 L1... . u ,, : 3% BM 15? . 11 _ .I * ' ' * 1., i - . ' - :
\‘s '5 h ' I ‘ 1‘ ‘
I ‘q. 10 . - . "“0 ¢
I t 1'... .. I ‘I‘ a. _\~\ . __ l in“ O ’ I . - I
25 ‘1‘ * I \. a h...‘ if. i = ._ J I { h 0 5 10 15 20 " Miles1‘ fitflil‘i-‘u-LII : HI “I n:- E—I‘JIE‘lI-l = I 2 PROJECT AREA " + '9
fl _._ _. II -— H 169 “la-Tl..-
'...||ll it h ”H.

E / “nun ,*‘ I ;i a“ ' E #:- £222.. ; - '.' ‘ fl IIII‘II- ' "' : Il- ' II I. it - 1.1:! I”,
.5 6 l I I it}
i- n. J i II! II" t... “E
III :lp':-- 2:: in. "‘ . '::\ ”If
: “‘1... -- . I. i ' 1‘ i : e t—a- - .- *. *-
- I. 'r : I? "'
Ioc
o H "'x #63,»
I
D :- i
i
I h
W'. '0. "' w. 114 s . : an 1 Mr N E I j: @ Mendota

I - I I
I I : E - w H
I = at g
I I '—
I g I I E
' i
I
I: 15
Iu-II==IDI'2* "Inn-mun..- I‘m“ """""
IIE |:| USGSQuad
: D Project Area
5 I lTownship 13S/Range 14E,
Scale: 124,000 Sections25, 36 N Firebaugh (1984), Coit Ranch (1984) 0 0.5 1 CA 7.5' USGS Topographic '—' i iMiles Quadrangles
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
I—I I—I I—I I—I I—I Feet 0 0.5 1
I—I I—I I—I I Kilometers
Figure 1 Project location on USGS Firebaugh and Coit Ranch 7.S-minute topographic quadrangles.

Cultural Resource Records Search forCrown Homes Development in Mendota, California Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, California Figure 2 Aerial view of the Project area.
o 0 100 200 300 400 500
Meters
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500
Feet
jhaller 10/13/2025
Project Area
© 2025 Microsoft Corporation © 2025 Maxar ©CNES (2025) Distribution Airbus DS Scale: 1:15,000
3 Second Lift Canal
Main Lift Canal
Amador Avenue
W Belmont Avenue
N Ohio Avenue
Gonzalez Street
Oxnard Street
State Route 33
'irf'
o
-‘. ta.- - h
, ’- I
ir' ’r i I £10
I. a: f " _. Jr
a 1-
{elf - +1.3 '- '14J.
_
. WBe|montVAvenue _ fi —' _ I . : M f{ , I I 'n I: ? fl ._.i't.'_*- - man a at. 1hi«1thlt-Jlr‘t“m1 + . . ii «I: .-I_ [-34- g “.. 1| I *I'!'l':'- .I _ - “* .
.'i __ 1 'IJH it “Hr-‘6' I
I ' E Project Area
N Scale: 1:15,000
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500
I—I I—I I—I IFeet 0 100 200 300 400 500
I—I I—I I—I IMeters
jhaller1 0/13/2025
Figure 2 Aerial View of the Project area. Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, California 4 Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, California Previous Cultural Studies
The earliest study, and the first of the four reports conducted in the Project area, was in 1975 for the Mid-Valley Canal Project as a joint project between the California Department of Water Resources and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Table 1). Although cultural resources were identified along the 185-mile canal alignment, none were recorded within the Project area or the 0.5-mile radius.

Table 1
Previous Cultural Resource Reports in the Project Area and 0.5-Mile Search Radius CHRIS
Report No. Author(s) Year Title
Within
Project Area
FR-00185 Peak, Ann S., Gerry,
Robert, Schulz,
Peter D., and
Riddell, Francis A.
1975 Archaeological Assessment of Cultural Resources—MidValley Canal Project in Fresno, Tulare, Merced, Madera, and Kings Counties, California
Yes
FR-00171 Kus, James S. 1988 Negative Archaeological Survey Report 6-Fre-33 P.M.

64.1/69.4 06250-343530
No
FR-01751 Smith, Ephraim K.,
Brewer, Chris, and
Powell, John
Edward
1989 Historical Architectural Survey Report for State Route 33 Road Widening 6-Fre-33-64.1/69.4, 06250-343530
No
FR-00806 Midway Sunset
Cogeneration
Company (MSCC)
1991 Cultural Resource Assessment of Self-Help Property in Mendota
No
FR-01617 Marine, Mandy 1999 Negative Archaeological Survey Report—First Supplemental 6-Fre-33 P.M. 62.5/69.6 343531
No
FR-02007 Chadderdon,
Thomas J., and
McClane, Debra
2001 Proposed Federal Correctional Facility Fresno County, California: Cultural Resource Investigations of the
Mendota Alternate, Fresno County, California
No
FR-02506 Brady, Jon and
Bunse, Rebecca
2006 Final Historic Resources Sensitivity Study Route 180 Westside Expressway Route Adoption Study
Yes
FR-02505 Leach-Palm, Laura,
Rosenthal, Jeffrey,
Byrd, Brian,
Mikkelson, Pat,
Waechter, Sharon,
and Bradeen, Jill
2006 Preliminary Assessment of the Archaeological Sensitivity for the Route 180 Westside Expressway Route Adoption
Study Between Interstate 5 and the City of Fresno,
Fresno County, California Interstate 5 PM 9.0 (KP 14.5) to 06-FRE-180 PM 54.2 (KP 87 Valentine Avenue)
EA06-451400
Yes
FR-02501 Binning, Jeanne 2008 Historic Property Survey Report for Route 180 Planned Westside Expressway from I-5 to Valentine Ave, Fresno,
Fresno County, California
Yes
FR-02414 Leach-Palm, Laura,
Brandy, Paul,
King, Jay,
Mikkelson, Pat,
Seil, Libby,
Hartman, Lindsay,
and Bradeen, Jill
2010 Cultural Resources Inventory of Caltrans District 6 Rural Conventional Highways in Fresno, Western Kern, Kings,
Madera, and Tulare Counties Summary of Methods and
Findings
No
Previous Cultural Studies
The earliest study, and the first of the four reports conducted in the Project area, was in 1975 forthe Mid-Valley Canal Project as a joint project between the California Department of Water Resources and the US Bureau of Reclamation (Table 1). Although cultural resources were identified along the 185-mile canal alignment, none were recorded Within the Project area or the 0.5-mile radius.

CHRIS
Report No.

FR—00185
FR—00171
FR—01751
FR—OO806
FR—01617
FR—02007
FR—02506
FR—02505
FR—02501
FR—02414
Auth0r(s)
Peak, Ann 8., Gerry,
Robert, Schulz,
Peter D., and
Riddell, Francis A.

Kus, James S.

Smith, Ephraim K.,
Brewer, Chris, and
Powell, John
Edward
Midway Sunset
C0generation
Company (MSCC)
Marine, Mandy
Chadderdon,
Thomas J., and
McClane, Debra
Brady, Jon and
Bunse, Rebecca
Leach—Palm, Laura,
Rosenthal, Jeffrey,
Byrd, Brian,
Mikkelson, Pat,
Waechter, Sharon,
and Bradeen, Jill
Binning, Jeanne
Leach—Palm, Laura,
Brandy, Paul,
King, Jay,
Mikkelson, Pat,
Seil, Libby,
Hartman, Lindsay,
and Bradeen, Jill
Year
1975
1988
1989
1991
1999
2001
2006
2006
2008
2010
Table 1
Title
Archaeological Assessment of Cultural Resources—MidValley Canal Project in Fresno, T ulare, Merced, Madera, and Kings Counties, California
Negative Archaeological Survey Report 6-Fre-33 PM
641/694 06250-343530
Historical Architectural Survey Report for State Route 33 Road Widening 6-Fre-33-64.I/69.4, 06250-343530
Cultural Resource Assessment ofSelf-Help Property in
Mendota
Negative Archaeological Survey Report—First
Supplemental 6-Fre-33 PM 62. 5/696 343531
Proposed Federal Correctional Facilily Fresno County,
California: Cultural Resource Investigations of the
Mendota Alternate, Fresno County, California
Final Historic Resources Sensitivity Study Route 180
Westside Expressway Route Adoption Study
Preliminary Assessment offhe Archaeological Sensitivity for the Route 180 Westside Expressway Route Adoption
Study Between Interstate 5 and the City of Fresno,
Fresno County, California Interstate 5 PM 9.0 (KP I 4.5) t0 06-FRE—180 PM 54.2 (KP 87 Valentine Avenue)
EA06-45I 400
Historic Property Survey Report for Route 180 Planned
Westside Expressway from [-5 t0 Valentine Ave, Fresno,
Fresno County, California
Cultural Resources Inventory ofCaltrans District 6 Rural Conventional Highways in Fresno, Western Kern, Kings,
Madera, and Tulare Counties Summary of Methods and
Findings
Cultural Resource Records Search forCrown Homes Development in Mendota, California Previous Cultural Resource Reports in the Project Area and 0.5-Mile Search Radius Within
Project Area
Yes
N0
N0
N0
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
5 Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, California The three remaining reports pertaining to the Project area are all part of a single study in support of the Route 180 Westside Expressway Route Adoption. The first is a Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Sensitivity report compiled by Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. (2006), followed by the 2006 Final Historic Resources Sensitivity Study by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). These two reports contain much of the same information, and neither identified any cultural resources within the Project area. The final report is the Historic Property Survey Report, also produced by Caltrans (2008). The purpose of this report was to identify resources eligible for the National Register of Historic Properties and/or for several California State registries. No resources included in the Caltrans report are within the Project area.

There are six additional studies conducted within the 0.5-mile radius, but outside the Project area. Of those six studies, four were negative for cultural resources, one contained a single isolated artifact outside the 0.5-mile radius, and the sixth and final study was the only one to yield a cultural resource in the 0.5-mile radius. This 2010 study was contracted through Caltrans. The field survey conducted from September 2008 to June 2009 covered more than 800 miles of Caltrans District 6 right-of-way on 25 rural highways across five counties, none of which had previously been surveyed. This survey resulted in an extensive cultural resources inventory report and documented the canal/aqueduct resource (P-10-005797) listed in Table 2.

Previously Recorded Cultural Resources
There were no cultural resources previously recorded within the Project area; however, Table 2 provides a description of the resources found outside of the Project area but within the 0.5-mile records search radius.

The three previously recorded resources, which are all historic era, include P-10-003930, a segment of the Southern Pacific Railroad; P-10-005365, a single-family property and farm/ranch; and P-10-005797, a historic canal/aqueduct. The Southern Pacific Railroad in the northeast corner of the 0.5-mile radius, is well outside of the Project area, as is the farm/ranch in the southern boundary of the 0.5-mile radius.

According to aerials examined in the Chadderdon and McClane report, P-10-005365 was likely destroyed and no longer existed by 2001. The final resource within the 0.5-mile radius, the canal/aqueduct, is closest to the Project area and runs through the north-northwest section of the

0.5-mile radius buffer. No precontact cultural resources were identified within the records search.

Table 2
Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within 0.5-miles of the Project Area Primary No. Trinomial Age Type Description CHRIS Report No.

P-10-003930 CA-FRE-003109H Historic Structure Roads/trails/railroad grades, engineering
structure
—
P-10-005365 — Historic Building Single-family property, Farm/ranch
—
P-10-005797 CA-FRE-003516H Historic Structure Canal/aqueduct FR-02414 E 5
The three remaining reports pertaining to the Project area are all part of a single study in support of the Route 180 Westside Expressway Route Adoption. The first is a Preliminary Assessment of Archaeological Sensitivity report compiled by Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc. (2006), followed by the 2006 Final Historic Resources Sensitivity Study by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). These two reports contain much of the same information, and neither identified any cultural resources Within the Project area. The final report is the Historic Property Survey Report, also produced by Caltrans (2008). The purpose of this report was to identify resources eligible for the National Register of Historic Properties and/or for several California State registries. N0 resources included in the Caltrans report are Within the Project area.

There are six additional studies conducted Within the 0.5-mile radius, but outside the Project area. Of those six studies, four were negative for cultural resources, one contained a Single isolated artifact outside the 0.5-mile radius, and the sixth and final study was the only one to yield a cultural resource in the 0.5-mile radius. This 2010 study was contracted through Caltrans. The field survey conducted from September 2008 to June 2009 covered more than 800 miles of Caltrans District 6 right—0f—way on 25 rural highways across five counties, none of which had previously been surveyed. This survey resulted in an extensive cultural resources inventory report and documented the canal/aqueduct resource (P-10-005797) listed in Table 2.

Previously Recorded Cultural Resources
There were 110cultural resources previously recorded Within the Project area; however, Table 2 provides a description of the resources found outside of the Project area but Within the 0.5-mile records search radius.

The three previously recorded resources, which are all historic era, include P-10-003930, a segment of the Southern Pacific Railroad; P—10—005365,a single-family property and farm/ranch; and P—10—005797, a historic canal/aqueduct. The Southern Pacific Railroad in the northeast corner of the 0.5—mile radius, is well outside of the Project area, as is the farm/ranch in the southern boundary of the 0.5—mile radius.

According to aerials examined in the Chadderdon and McClane report, P-10-005365 was likely destroyed and no longer existed by 2001. The final resource Within the 0.5-mile radius, the canal/aqueduct, is closest to the Project area and runs through the north-northwest section of the

0.5-mile radius buffer. N0 precontact cultural resources were identified within the records search.

Table 2
Previously Recorded Cultural Resources Within 0.5—miles0f the Project Area Primary N0. Trinomial Age Type Description CHRIS Report No.

P—1 0—003930 CA-FRE-OO3 109H Historic Structure Roads/trails/railroad — grades, engineering
structure
P—1 0—005365 — Historic Building Single—family property, — Farm/ranch
P—10—005797 CA-FRE-OO3516H Historic Structure Canal/aqueduct FR-02414 Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, California 6 Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, California

SUMMARY
The SSJVIC identified a total of three previously recorded cultural resources and 10 cultural resource studies within the Project area and 0.5-mile radius.

The Project is in a rural area that has been investigated multiple times for cultural resources, but the Project area itself has not been archaeologically surveyed. Additionally, the surrounding 0.5-mile radius has only been surveyed to an approximate 25 percent coverage. Given the moderate sensitivity of the area for archaeological resources, it is possible that unrecorded cultural materials, potential significant or unique resources, or Tribal Cultural Resources exist within the Project area. Therefore, Æ recommends a complete cultural resource study, including a pedestrian survey, be conducted by a qualified archaeologist in support of CEQA compliance with any further recommendations provided after the survey. All historical resources should be recorded on California Department of Parks and Recreation series 523 forms and included in a final report to be submitted to the SSJVIC.

If potential human remains are discovered, the Fresno County Coroner should be contacted immediately.

Pursuant to Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98, if the remains are thought to be Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which will then notify the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The landowner or a designated representative will coordinate with the MLD on the respectful treatment and disposition of the remains, which can include preservation in place. Further provisions of PRC Section 5097.98 are to be followed, as applicable.

Æ appreciates the opportunity to provide services for this Project. Please contact us if you need additional work. If you have any further questions, please contact Anna Hoover at (951) 505-8511 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Anna Hoover, M.S. RPA 28576661
Managing Principal/Principal Archaeologist
Applied EarthWorks, Inc.

Attachment 1 SSJVIC Records Search
E 6

SUMMARY
The SSJVIC identified a total of three previously recorded cultural resources and 10 cultural resource studies Within the Project area and 0.5—mile radius.

The Project is in a rural area that has been investigated multiple times for cultural resources, but the Project area itself has not been archaeologically surveyed. Additionally, the surrounding 0.5—mile radius has only been surveyed to an approximate 25 percent coverage. Given the moderate sensitivity of the area for archaeological resources, it is possible that unrecorded cultural materials, potential significant or unique resources, or Tribal Cultural Resources exist Within the Project area. Therefore, PErecommends a complete cultural resource study, including a pedestrian survey, be conducted by a qualified archaeologist in support of CEQA compliance with any further recommendations provided after the survey. All historical resources should be recorded on California Department of Parks and Recreation series 523 forms and included in a final report to be submitted to the SSJVIC.

If potential human remains are discovered, the Fresno County Coroner should be contacted immediately.

PEappreciates the opportunity to provide services for this Project. Please contact us if you need additional work. If you have any further questions, please contact Anna Hoover at (951) 505-8511 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
@44/
Anna Hoover, M.S. RPA 28576661
Managing Principal/Principal Archaeologist
Applied EarthWorks, Inc.

Attachment 1 SSJVIC Records Search
Cultural Resource Records Search for Crown Homes Development in Mendota, California Record Search location map for the Project - AE4573, Crown Homes Mendota. 0 0.5 1
Kilometers
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Feet
0 0.5 1
Miles
Scale: 1:24,000
o
13S 14E: 25, 36
Firebaugh (1984), Coit Ranch (1984), CA 7.5'
USGS Topographic Quadrangles
Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Survey Area Study Area (RS limit)
Firebaugh
Coit Ranch
. O 4' b
.0... F
' ‘ u 73 3 ‘ $ K!"
:0 25 s‘ f 15
. II ' a I . Q
l. ‘
In
I u* Issac-as “sascszsszaa assac : “I :1 ' C E ._ 0v ‘ 2 7 Vie-3%.T t. L w 169 [7" “‘(G_?.‘ I >
-— s ”a
.' \" ~3237-53~ a .00.... . ‘ I
. o "“0 ‘1. G «no». .‘ .5 ... 0.... . 0.. . O
. I 00.00 . o. "‘ ‘ :Iooouo ;. o Q. .U- z . ""1, o o . ..o: o co ' u - .. no
: 1 6 z. r\ ‘0 ...
’11” .. : '\ . | . '0'). O.
.
ix”! 0:] 5"... .°
: .gg'. :: : . \ . .
'n . . O Q
: :..':_:3 .0 s '. 0° ‘. O .h
~.: 0 . o. 'flx 9A) ~ e -.~. *_~
: I ' ' " .~ in,
. 0’... C. . '. . C I '-
' ‘ - ' .° 0.. I : ' ' -,-~ ..- -* *
: 2 as . s
' ‘°' ° . .0. v ' .. ‘ 74 . —.———i 0 -a I j :5" 194 T\ I an 1 "5,, . 1143 i n. ® Mendota .

I: n I . '. \
a ' l I I l I I 1 . u
'l I
' ' v on
. ' u- ‘- ' I:

I
I
I I HU
I
I o 5' - 6 _.._ 33:38. caucuses: ”g .’--88888".9# "" B o i
I
I
I
I
. - II
I
I
I
I
'I 304 176,
QI¢====ong ', _ ... .‘==53.-r
iaszesz H.823’I‘3=+F-382 n. m . ‘1‘- II .- S A
7 Coézyrightz© 2013 Nation E urvey rea
I |:| StudyArea(RSlimit)
I III 13S 14E: 25, 36 Scale: 1124,000 Firebaugh (1984), Coit Ranch (1984), CA 7.5' N USGS Topographic Quadrangles 0 0.5 1 I —| : : Miles 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
I—I I—I I—I I—I I—I Feet 0 0.5 1
I—I I—I I—I I Kilometers A‘‘AppLied EARTHWORKSInc. Record Search location map for the Project -AE45 73, Crown Homes Mendota. 10/6/2025
Emily Booker
Applied EarthWorks, Inc.
1391 W. Shaw Ave., Suite C
Fresno, CA 93711
Re: 4753 Crown Homes Mendota Record Search
Records Search File No.: 25-393
The Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on Coit Ranch & Firebaugh USGS 7.5’ quads. The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and the 0.5 mile radius:

As indicated on the data request form, the locations of resources and reports are provided in the following format: ☐ Custom GIS Maps ☒ GIS Data ☐ Hand Drawn Maps (Inyo County Only) Resources within project area: None
Resources within 0.5 mile radius: P-10-003930, 005635, 005797 Reports within project area: FR-00185, 02501, 02505, 02506 Reports within 0.5 mile radius: FR-00171, 00806, 01617, 01751, 02007, 02414 NOTE: Report locations in the project radius were omitted, per the CHRIS Data Request Form.

Resource Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Digital Database Records: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (list): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Database Printout (details): ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Report Digital Database Records: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed Resource Record Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed ☒ not available Report Copies: ☒ enclosed ☐ not requested ☐ nothing listed ☒ not available Note:

OHP Built Environment Resources Directory: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility: ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976): ☐ enclosed ☒ not requested ☐ nothing listed . . F r e S n O SouthemSanJoaquinValleyInfonnafionCenter 93? 1f0 r
I} 1a I n 0 CaliforniaStateUniversity,Bakersfield
Hlstorlcal K y MaiIStop:TZDOB
— e 1' n 9001StockdaleHighway 36 50 u 1‘ Ce 5_ Kin g s Bakersfield,Califomia93311-1022 Informatlon Madera (661)654L2289
_ Email:[email protected] £575t e m ‘°‘:,‘ T u l a re Website:www.csub.edu/ssjvic 10/6/2025
Emily Booker
Applied EarthWorks, Inc.
1391 W. Shaw Ave., Suite C
Fresno, CA 93711
Re: 4753 Crown Homes Mendota Record Search
Records Search File No.: 25-393
The Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center received your record search request for the project area referenced above, located on Coit Ranch & Firebaugh USGS75’ quads. The following reflects the results of the records search for the project area and the 0.5 mile radius:

As indicated on the data request form, the locations of resources and reports are provided in the following format: III Custom GISMaps GISData III Hand Drawn Maps (lnyo County Only) None
P-10-003930, 005635, 005797
FR-00185, 02501, 02505, 02506
FR-00171, 00806, 01617, 01751, 02007, 02414
Resources within project area:

Resourceswithin 0.5 mile radius:

Reports within project area:

Reports within 0.5 mile radius:

Resource DatabasePrintout (list):

Resource DatabasePrintout (details):

Resource Digital Database Records:

Report DatabasePrintout (list):

Report DatabasePrintout (details):

Report Digital Database Records:

Resource Record Copies:

Report Copies:

OHP Built Environment Resources Directory:

Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility:

CA Inventory of Historic Resources (1976):
enclosed
enclosed
enclosed
enclosed
enclosed
enclosed
enclosed
enclosed
III enclosed
III enclosed
El enclosed
III not requested
III not requested
III not requested
El not requested
III not requested
III not requested
El not requested
El not requested
not requested
not requested
not requested
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
III nothing listed
Caltrans Bridge Survey: Not available at SSJVIC; please see https://dot.ca.gov/programs/environmental-analysis/cultural-studies/california-historical-bridges-tunnels Ethnographic Information: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Literature: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see
http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/
Local Inventories: Not available at SSJVIC
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx#searchTabIndex=0&searchByTypeIndex=1 and/or http://www.oac.cdlib.org/view?docId=hb8489p15p;developer=local;style=oac4;doc.view=items Shipwreck Inventory: Not available at SSJVIC; please see https://www.slc.ca.gov/shipwrecks/
Soil Survey Maps: Not available at SSJVIC; please see
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRIS Inventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Should you require any additional information for the above referenced project, reference the record search number listed above when making inquiries. Invoices for Information Center services will be sent under separate cover from the California State University, Bakersfield Accounting Office.

Thank you for using the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS).

Sincerely,
Celeste M. Thomson
Coordinator
CaltransBridge Survey: Not available at SSJVIC;please see https://dot.ca.gov/programs/environmental-analysis/culturaI-studies/caIifornia-historical-bridges-tunnels Ethnographic Information: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Literature: Not available at SSJVIC
Historical Maps: Not available at SSJVIC;please see
http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/
Local Inventories: Not available at SSJVIC
GLO and/or Rancho Plat Maps: Not available at SSJVIC;please see http://www.g|orecords.blm.gov/search/default.aspx#searchTablndex=0&searchBvTvpelndex=1 and/or http://www.oac.cd|ib.0rg/view?doc|d=hb8489p15p;developer=locaI;stvle=oac4;doc.view=items Shipwreck Inventory: Not available at SSJVIC;please see https://www.slc.ca.gov/shipwrecks/
Soil Survey Maps: Not available at SSJVIC;please see
http://websoilsurvev.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvev.aspx Please forward a copy of any resulting reports from this project to the office as soon as possible. Due to the sensitive nature of archaeological site location data, we ask that you do not include resource location maps and resource location descriptions in your report if the report is for public distribution. If you have any questions regarding the results presented herein, please contact the office at the phone number listed above.

The provision of CHRIS Data via this records search response does not in any way constitute public disclosure of records otherwise exempt from disclosure under the California Public RecordsAct or any other law, including, but not limited to, records related to archeological site information maintained by or on behalf of, or in the possession of, the State of California, Department of Parks and Recreation, State Historic Preservation Officer, Office of Historic Preservation, or the State Historical Resources Commission.

Due to processing delays and other factors, not all of the historical resource reports and resource records that have been submitted to the Office of Historic Preservation are available via this records search. Additional information may be available through the federal, state, and local agencies that produced or paid for historical resource management work in the search area. Additionally, Native American tribes have historical resource information not in the CHRISInventory, and you should contact the California Native American Heritage Commission for information on local/regional tribal contacts.

Thank you for using the California Historical ResourcesInformation System (CHRIS).

Sincerely,
WJW
Celeste M. Thomson
Coordinator

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians
Elizabeth D. Kipp, Chairperson
P.O. Box 337
Auberry, CA 93602
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Elizabeth D. Kipp:

The City of Mendota is processing an application for the above-referenced project and is requesting your review to determine if formal consultation is appropriate pursuant to Government Code Section 65352.3 (Senate Bill 18).

The project proposes the development of a 271-lot residential subdivision on an approximately 53.43-acre portion of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST (project site). The project site is located outside the City of Mendota’s current city limits and its Sphere of Influence, adjacent to the west side of Amador Avenue and the western extent of the existing city limits. In addition to the 271 single-family residential lot tentative subdivision map, the project includes a request to annex the project site into the City of Mendota and to amend the City’s Sphere of Influence to include the project site. Additionally, the project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN 012-190-25ST to Medium Density Residential while concurrently amending the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN 012-190-25ST to the R-1 zone district (Single-Family/Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation.

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Pursuant to Senate Bill 18, the Tribe has 90 days to request formal consultation. Given the timelines involved in preparing project materials, the required public review periods, conducting the requisite hearings, and finalizing the applications combined with the community’s need for quality affordable housing, we respectfully request that the Tribe consider the items herein as expeditiously as possible.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
BigSandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians
Elizabeth D. Kipp, Chairperson
PO. Box 337
Auberry, CA93602
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Elizabeth D. Kipp:

The project proposes the development of a 271-Iot residential subdivision on an approximately 53.43—acreportion of Assessor’sParcel Numbers 012-190-255T and 012-160-255T (project site). The project site is located outside the City of Mendota’s current city limits and its Sphere of Influence, adjacent to the west side of Amador Avenue and the western extent of the existing city limits. In addition to the 271single-family residential lot tentative subdivision map, the project includes a request to annex the project site into the City of Mendota and to amend the City’s Sphere of Influence to include the project site. Additionally, the project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN012-190-255T to Medium Density Residential while concurrently amending the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN012-190-255T to the R-1 zone district (Single-Fami/Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation.

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski,AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’sMap
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
52' R/W LOCAL STREET SECTION 56' R/W LOCAL STREET SECTION 84' R/W COLLECTOR STREET SECTION Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

Ch. By: Date: Scale: As Noted YH Job No. Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Jennifer Proctor Plot Date: 10/28/2025 File Location: F:\2025\25-142\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\25-142_TTM_SHEET 1.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM JRJ/JP AB 10/27/25 25-142 1 3
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6541
NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELMONT AVENUE AND STATE ROUTE 33 EXISTING TREES EXISTING BUILDINGS EXISTING USE EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED USE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE PROPOSED ZONING SOURCE OF WATER SOURCE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SOURCE OF ELECTRICITY SOURCE OF GAS SOURCE OF CABLE T.V. SOURCE OF TELEPHONE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER SITE AREA SITE ADDRESS VICINITY MAP: SITE LOCATION PREPARED BY: LOT INFO:
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
” LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OWNER: NOTES: SUBDIVIDER: SITE INFORMATION: NOTES:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

VESTI
N
G
6 n l I
Q)" 99 FOUND 3/4 WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT CROWNHOMES TE N TATI VE 8U B D I VI 8' ON M AP :3) @9 IRON PIPE.DOWN 286 w CROMWELL AVE 5320E. PINE AVE.FRESNO OF ‘QN’LQQ 6. ‘0 6”, TAGGEDU.R. FRESNO,CA93711 CALIFORNIA 93727 $. ‘6 $\$ /\ 1, PH.(559)224—1523 PH.(559)815-0275 Q <9 0 V‘ 9 <9 iQ~OV<o+$@106 957:5$0:’\‘0 0 1 Q9 SS (Ll \’\ O «6 V x) o 5’ / - \fisi’e? §$§b€~o§flp PREPAREDBY: LOTINFO:
«35; ' N473? 54E 0‘5$0 YAMABE & HORNENGINEERING, INC. TOTAL MW.MOTH MW.DEPTH A P LAN N ED D EVE LOP M EN T
6&3, yt 29.99
o
fi0® 2985N.BURL AVE,SUITE101 271 50FT 100FT _|_ E CO _|_ OI: PRES O C FOR I g“) .59. ' \. FRESNO,CALIFORNIA 93727 ' ' . $9 o \ . 9+ PH.(559) 244—3123 AE_20 AREA _ _ 5o. 00AC (NET) IN H U N Y N : ALI N I A U Q N h >,_ g:

E
/ dis; DENSITY
= 5.42 UNITS/ACRE SH EET ’] OF 3 = S“ g
8 ' 0 6" N51°54’26”E n <1: - . / )7)? ' 30‘09’ FOUND 3/4" - Gt: 0 95 IRONPIPE,DOWN = :3 0‘2 2”, TAGGED U.R. m. m 5,
% Lur: . . Q n:
2 ,, LEGALDESCRIPTION. NOTES. u.<1: . FOUND3/4 ,, FOUND 3/4 w = Z F >— a .. /' 6”,PLS 4151 10' NO TAG ALLTHAT PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 36,TOWNSHIP 13SOUTH, WELLS POWER ”N53,TOWERS’ “0.»WWW THE PROPOSED SUBD'V'S'ON To I: <7: RANGE14EAST,MOUNT DIABLO BASE ANDMERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THEOFFICIAL UNITED BEREMOVED. h 0 a 33 g STATESGOVERNMENT TOWNSHIPPLATTHEREOF,IN THECITY OFFOWLER,COUNTY OFFRESNO, w Lu g
09,639 /\ STATEOF CALIFORNIA, ANDBEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AsFOLLOWS: 2- TH'S AREA '5 NOT SUBJECT TOFLOOD 'NUNDAT'ON- g g g.) k, «*5 $0 0 o : Lu“ l\ q; \ \\ , 3. EXISTING UNDERGROUNDFEATURESSUCH AS WELLS,CESSPOOLS,SEWERS, Lu > o? 83. $39 guys/£6 -- - (4:34} BEGINNIN.G 5T THENORTHEAST CORNER OFSAIDNORTHWESTQUARTER,THENCE CULVERTS’STORMDRAW,ANDOTHER UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES WWW m 2 q:
3 v Q $9 Q3) $\$ «Q r *5 {‘65 SOUTH13804” WEST,1661.81FEET,ALONG THEEASTLINEOFSAIDNORTHWESTQUARTER TO THE pRoposgo SUBDIVISION TOBEREMOVED, : w. .n N
Lu' «<0 ”LO00$ [ I \5 QA7., THESOUTHEAST CORNER OFSAIDNORTHWEST QUARTER;THENCE L3 g 5:”: =23 @Vé} QKQ _L.J "v5," LEAVING SAID EASTLINE,NORTH89°54’08” WEST,1290.57FEET; THENCE 4. THEDESIGNOFTHEPROPOSED SUBDIVISION SHALLPROVIDE TOTHE E I- Z ‘1'!E1 3/4» 9“ I I
38 \ / To 0F géL%%zuF&¢Fg§LiN20%Taugzuzaig‘isg
fiTex:waging/2;V'zEsg'usEsgwigEyNG _ ,RONPHDE’ DOWN . 51 w 5,
a L0. n o . , ,, ENERGY RESOURCES.THIS SUBDIVISIONHASBEENDESIGNATED WITH210 = -- o: 2' 18,, NOTAG g;S; l I E m EKPNTAPG'ZEDD'QLZN'RQ,N mpg, DOWN SOUTH895408 EAST,1290.57FEET ALONGSAIDNORTHLINE,TOTHETRUEPOINT OF 0,.- THELOTSORENTED,N A NORTH TOSOUTH OR,ENTAT,ON TOTAKE >.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

42.02'
\ . ., , ‘ -————— ' 5. ALLSTREETS ADJACENT TOTHEBOUNDARIESOFTHIS SUBDIVISIONHAVE - + ./ 88954 08E 652.42 \.\ — — —692.99'— — — 1 PARCEL2 BEENPREVIOUSLY DEDICATEDFOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES AND ALL ARE l\ /' I. .\ 129652, I | 88—9'54T08”E ALL THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25,TOWNSHIP 13SOUTH, T0 REMA'N- \ I . 29032. RANGE14EAST,MOUNT DIABLO BASE ANDMERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THEOFFICIAL UNITED 5- THERE ARENO EX'ST'NG CANALS0R BITCHES LOCATED W'TH'N THE ‘. [— / L ' STATESGOVERNMENT TOWNSHIPPLATTHEREOF,IN THECITY OFFOWLER,COUNTY OFFRESNO, PROPOSEDSUBD'V'S'ONS " II x \ / \ /' \ L Jr: STATEOFCALIFORNIA,ANDBEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED ASFOLLOWS: 7 ms SITE IS 'N FLOOD ZONE”x" ANDIS NOTFLOODPRONEPER THE L J —— b3) ° ' l l l l [ I ‘36}; A l COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OFSAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE FLOOD 'NSURANCE RATE MAPS \l j K F 10 @\$C9$66 I NORTH 89°54’08” WEST, 62.02 .FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER TO 8. ALL PROPOSED SEWER, WATER, STORM DRAIN, CURB, CUTTER, SIDEWALK, l |_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Q3»19$ 09 THETRUE PP'NT 0"" BEG'NN'NG.THENCE PAVEMENT,STREET TREES,ANDSTREET LIGHTIMPROVEMENTS ARETOBE _ _ _ w _ L. ' /\ 9+ <5) NORTH1‘3804” EAST,305.00 FEET; THENCE DONEIN ACCORDANCEWITH CITY OFMENDOTA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. ' _ _ _ __ _ _ _ '— 60“ NORTH89‘54’08”WEST,602.09 FEET; THENCE 9. SURROUNDINGLANDUSES: _| L L (EU SOUTH 1‘38’04”WEST, 305.00FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; EESRTTH : égg'gg fiffifl
l l - ' THENCE , , ,, SOUTH— AGRICULTURAL l ‘N 0- SOUTH895408 EAST,602.09 FEET,ALONGSAIDSOUTHLINE,TO THETRUEPOINTOF WEST _ AGRmULTURAL I I l— — - | BEGINNING. l 2 l E T, l 10. GRADE DIFFERENTIAL ALONGEAST ANDSOUTHBOUNDARY WILLBE /\ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ ' . - —. _ ADDRESSEDBY RETAINING WALL OR SLOPEEASEMENT& MAYEXCEED 6”. (Le _ SHEET ~ u NOTES. \90’ 0% /\ l — o' 33 EE — a a; — l '4. . +' 11. THEFOLLOWING OUTLOT TOBEDEDICATEDIN FEEBYTHIS MAPTOTHE ’ $ _ _ _ _ _ EASEMENTSGRANTED TO . \0 5 CITY OFMENDOTA FOR STORMDRAINPURPOSES AND THEMAINTENANCE $ (<9 ofo 010 -_ . - WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICTFOR THEREOF: g? “4 <3» $\$$« __1 l l b T 53, UTILITY PURPOSESPERDOCUMENT OUTLOT A = 183.570iSF \;\ 1,0 Ox) l l Ll— . 4] fix \ RECORDEDFEBRUARY 7, 1973,IN u“ ehLQGJ _ l l l W $3 $34 I Q BOOK 6125 ATPAGE175—180 Q;
fl /\ $ ‘ <5 O.R.F.C.(EASEMENTS WITHIN THE . V Kgy0$0® 09$ l PROJECT LIMITS TOBEREMOVED SITE INFORMATION- /\ l 6‘ $56) WITHFINALMAP) EXISTING TREES
Q30 — l l QQQ‘I ’\ 6‘ \ l — — — — — — . — LIMITS OFSUBJECTPROPERTY NONE §$$€l ~30 l l |_ E‘L J, EXISTING BUILDINGS . h. — ..- PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE NONE :2 :2 :g_ _ _ I a. F | | F _ : PUBLIC STREETEASEMENTNOW EXISTING USE :3 m 4“ l l— ? f I <9 OFFEREDFOR DEDICATION FOR LIJ
to ~ g —
— —
— —
— —
— —
— — v ~ STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY VACANT LAND
.0 . l '0 :N g X M a’ a —T 3; — l 3g . fg PURPOSES EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE '5 2; m _ _ _ _ - _ * °_‘
K
2 E sflEE I 50 ~ , 66 5;) & EXISTINGSTORMDRAININLET AGR'CULTURAL O
E I SE I | l I I ' ‘» $v 93‘«L .3 EXISTINGZONING a: . | I, liVO/\$\$O{><”$: l 5?: © EXISTING SANITARY SEWERMANHOLE AE_20EXCLUSNE AGR,CULTURAL LLI v I~ :0 l _ a _ _ n , <9Egg” '27) ® EXISTING STORMDRAIN MANHOLE PROPOSED USE q __’_ “x _ _ ‘ _ _ _ _ If? . SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENTIAL |~ l l | I. _ . _ o—cgg EXISTING STREETLIGHT PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE (I) l L . . MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
Q
Q .—I: I ”OJ EX'ST'NGUT'L'TY POLE PROPOSEDZONING ‘; <2:

I — — R—1SINGLEFAMILY MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL lo 4|: l EXISTING STREET LIGHTBOX ‘0 Lu ' If I SOURCE OF WATER D. 3 .‘ | I «- PROPOSEDDRAINAGEDIRECTION CITY OF MENDOTA q E
\ _ _ _ _ _| _ _ _ _ _ _
fl— _ SOURCE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL E >
| | ~ — — — CENTERL'NE CITY OFMENDOTA |~ <1;
\ ’ l W RELINQUISHED ACCESSFOR PUBLIC SOURCE OF ELECTRICITY U |~ \ N89°54, 08,, w1296.52’ ’ l ’23) PURPOSES <
2 (262x I PG&E D: O
9‘ 24 oo’ ' C’fiQ‘xGfi’Qg’d —(so)—
—
— — EXISTING STORM DRAIN LINE SOURCE OF GAS l‘ E
99:22)?) /\ k $O®$Oo<9 PG&E LLI ~l QN ”\\}$«Q‘\O n: IE 9+ $6, —(ss)— —
— — EXISTING SEWER LINE SOURCEOF CABLE
T V 2 Lu
\>? $ Q» $\ /\ Q 2 2 h DISHNETWORK FOUND 3/4” /\ O g$ <1:Lu9 , l + (W)— —
— — EXISTING WATER LINE < LL
IRON PIPE,DOWN \n $00 3 3: q: I SOURCEOFTELEPHONE l‘ o 18 . N0 TAG <95” FOUND 3/4” —(0H—E)— —
— — EXISTING OVERHEADELECTRICLINE T—MOBILE
2 v LLI D: - IRON PIPEDOWN 24.00' 18, » NOTAG ’ ASSESSOR'SPARCELNUMBER I~ LLI \ . _ . _ . _ _ .BELMONTAVENUE —(IRR)———— EXISTINGIRRIGATIONLINE 012 190 253T PORNON 2 \ . . ,, , «Ix — O12—160—25ST (PORTION)
9630’» GROSSPROJECT AREA 5343 ACRESMOREORLESS
U Q$‘%':\o\>$\$i;\4\ T7 EX'ST'NG”“5 HYDRANT NET PROJECT AREA: 50.06 ACRES, MORE OR LESS (I; \> o$ O
0 @0 QIJ’QKQO -(xxx.xx)— EXISTING CONTOUR ELEVATION SITE ADDRESS Lg“ VQ’IL NOT YET ASSIGNED ss PROPOSED SEWER LINE
E
P/L (E P/L P/L (E P/L © PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER D:

MANHOLE VICINITYMAP
0 so PROPOSED STORMDRAINLINE ' 0 PROPOSED STORMDRAINMANHOLE (Z) .: SDDI STORM DRAIN INLET UJ E
I I : _ 93 52 R/W LOCAL STREET SECTION 56 RNV LOCAL STREET SECTION SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE GINL l':

E
NOT TOSCALE NOT TOSCALE g (”-3 ,_ SSMH SANITARY SEWERMANHOLE Z O 8 flj
(g SITELOCATION —§ 3 ((63) E (:5 F’/L
42, 42,
P/L SP IRRIGATION STANDPIPE < E 6‘»
10’ 32’ 32’ 10’ BELMONT AVE \ II Dr. By: JRJ/JP = — = — = = ~ , O.R.F.C. OFFICIAL RECORDSFRESNOCOUNTY :3 NTS A 10’ _4 10’ _ A 42E 9% ¥ . LANDSCAPE TRAIL 12.B|_Dli;m°N 7‘ S/W 7 :9: 5) Ch" By.L /PLANTER —— m LANE s’iANTER , , F.C.R. FRESNO COUNTYRECORDS 0 mm 413;}? maumous ”ma. Date: 10/27/25 22mm
&_ i <1“ J LF:::I’ Scale: As Noted _ _ YH Job No. 25-142 @ 84' WW COLLECTOR STREET SECTION SheetNo. 1

NOT TO SCALE
of 3 Sheets
Plot Date: 10/28/2025 File Location: F:\2025\25-142\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\25-142_TTM_SHEET 1.dwg Plot By: JenniferProctor 2 5,025 S.F. 5 5,025 S.F. 6 5,035 S.F. 7 5,025 S.F. 8 6,231 S.F. 165 6,333 S.F. 166 6,229 S.F. 167 5,023 S.F. 168 5,023 S.F. 169 5,023 S.F. 170 5,023 S.F. 171 5,023 S.F. 172 5,023 S.F. 174 5,023 S.F. 173 5,023 S.F. 175 5,023 S.F. 176 5,023 S.F. 177 5,023 S.F. 178 5,023 S.F. 179 5,023 S.F. 180 5,023 S.F. 181 6,229 S.F. 182 5,315 S.F. 163 6,231 S.F. 164 5,828 S.F. 200 6,069 S.F. 199 6,233 S.F. 198 5,027 S.F. 197 5,027 S.F. 196 5,027 S.F. 195 5,027 S.F. 194 5,027 S.F. 193 5,027 S.F. 192 5,027 S.F. 191 5,027 S.F. 190 5,027 S.F. 189 5,027 S.F. 188 5,027 S.F. 187 5,027 S.F. 186 5,027 S.F. 185 5,027 S.F. 184 6,233 S.F. 183 5,586 S.F. 201 6,333 S.F. 202 6,229 S.F. 203 5,023 S.F. 204 5,023 S.F. 205 5,023 S.F. 206 5,023 S.F. 207 5,023 S.F. 208 5,023 S.F. 209 5,023 S.F. 210 5,023 S.F. 211 5,023 S.F. 212 5,023 S.F. 213 5,023 S.F. 214 5,023 S.F. 215 5,023 S.F. 216 5,023 S.F. 217 6,229 S.F. 218 5,315 S.F. 236 6,091 S.F. 237 5,577 S.F. 238 5,075 S.F. 239 5,075 S.F. 240 5,075 S.F. 241 5,075 S.F. 242 5,075 S.F. 243 5,075 S.F. 244 5,075 S.F. 245 5,075 S.F. 246 5,075 S.F. 247 5,075 S.F. 249 10,129 S.F. 251 11,122 S.F. 252 9,364 S.F. 253 10,394 S.F. 254 12,420 S.F. 255 12,222 S.F. 256 10,927 S.F. 257 9,303 S.F. 258 9,363 S.F. 259 10,393 S.F. 260 12,420 S.F. 261 12,224 S.F. 262 10,946 S.F. 263 9,313 S.F. 264 9,312 S.F. 265 10,210 S.F. 266 12,591 S.F. 267 12,417 S.F. 268 10,740 S.F. 269 8,659 S.F. OUTLOT A 183,570SF 250 10,146 S.F. 270 6,125 S.F. 271 5,564 S.F. 248 5,964 S.F. 219 5,609 S.F. 220 6,233 S.F. 221 5,027 S.F. 222 5,027 S.F. 223 5,027 S.F. 224 5,027 S.F. 225 5,027 S.F. 226 5,027 S.F. 227 5,027 S.F. 228 5,027 S.F. 229 5,027 S.F. 230 5,027 S.F. 231 5,027 S.F. 232 5,027 S.F. 233 5,027 S.F. 234 5,027 S.F. 235 6,233 S.F. 1 5,564 S.F. 3 6,231 S.F. 4 5,025 S.F.

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

Ch. By: Date: Scale: As Noted YH Job No. Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Jared Jones Plot Date: 11/3/2025 File Location: F:\2025\25-142\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\25-142_TTM_SHEET 2.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM JP/JRJ AB 10/27/25 25-142 2 3 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6541
NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELMONT AVENUE AND STATE ROUTE 33 MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 3 TRACT MAP 6146 EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 529550 551 552 553 TRACT MAP 6148 EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 589 590591 592 593594 595 596 —‘ \ J 889°54’08”E602.09’ Ref' 8‘ Rev' 602': VESTING / F TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP / f ‘\ OF I K I IRACTNO. 65% ' ’ (A PLANNEDDEVELOPMENT) ‘ I IN FRESNOCOUNTn CAUFORNU\ ! ( SHEET2 OF 3 ing, Inc.
3 g): l l M 3: I OUTLOTA I: ‘v 0 183,5708F 720, O o n N) Bo
3’3
E
N1'38'04”E 305.00,
—
—

II'IEEI'
‘ <-} (12;; __________ E1 L K J/ W IIIII
\D/
NI alIl
(nU)
(I)
(I)
389°54'08"E 652.42, I, 1%
146’:l: .., 152':l: .44 157’: 160’:l: 157':l: 1603: . _. 157’: 1603: S." l ' _ ' ".‘ ~ \ a ,H/ Hi 17' as} ' H u -i 1 \ gaggomiégggm ‘, \ ’ 24H: 1:5»? ‘ 5;, ‘ - . ‘ INFORMATION J .. 3 248 \ I\ . s 21¢ / Q g ,'_.l ‘ | to 5,964SF. \ / 4775;" ~ I) j. { \l -H \ 41' . l I I ‘ , 249 b 54 44 44 I; , ,r 595 596
100i ““29”- °’ 254 8 1232532F\ 260 “N 1232?;F 266 N 267 / ;:'.;,1| l H; 7 _1l l , 12,420SF. ‘— ’ ‘ ' ‘ 12,420SF. 2 ’ ' ' 12,591SF. 9 12'4” S'F' J | l x j 101 :l: 76‘ ’5); )5/ / 4r: J A 7- SSMH. U» \ <6 76 // I I 5 ll'- [ RIM=(168.97) :H u» | L ‘— 247 , ~2< A I ,, l0 5,0758.F. 123i 5” “I: .‘H // / "q- fig-13k E‘L (K! k K % g 3% //— \\ 101i , \ " / 4* 5‘ 43'1‘ \ \ / // RIM: 9.19.1 SDg ;;I w] ov g: ,.p I r. gé" — — ————————— — , '- / 12”(w)IN\/=( 0.62j)l1.;;v=‘ l '\’_ 5+ 253 ) 256 259 10PUE—\/ ., \ 262 265 2 Z/ Ji‘1’9,‘—-= g EinNG -H 250 fi 10,394SF. 10,927SF. 10,393SF. _..- 10,946SF. 10,210s_|=_ / . 1' 107 . : ALVES =- 246 to Ix / ‘ \ .. I. 91:... _ _ 5,075SF. 10,146S.F. / /‘fl :1 :3; /:/~I 30. 00. _ 60 00, I:2 ¢\ IS: [v u . f ,t “A fiOAIZALESSTREET . 10'PUE , |.L10’Put: , l iii-'1 1 ‘ / / —.—-—-_—._-*+—»a— ' ‘09i 109i ‘ I 109:l: ‘ 109’ J ) [5,51 l y l f .fi¢;_x ‘._,_. 148i - / 109:l: N EXISTING , / ._ _. -H \ 6;] \ . EDGES OF \\ 5" K 5; ’3‘ K ' — — — — j ' L 245 \ W/ \\‘\’ . SWALE 3|,0 _ , f \ Lo 5075SF. / I' P \ ’5' . ‘ H’ ' ' ’ +| +| +I fl UX' 251 In 20 252 257 go 258 263 I \\\\ fl 1 I O I ‘ 1,3 264 \w 269 \ it 3551 I ‘ l x"4 594 I . ’ 11,122SF. '\ ’\ 9,364SF. 9,303s.F. '\ 9,363SF. 9,313SF. 9,312SF. 8559SE \ VI *4 I I V‘: l fifigRNE/ALVE 101i 5’LE 5'”; . 14’:l: \ I" I l j 1: l l l . 5LE :4:- A 1 :15 244 \2<———————138’:l:— — —L — — ——————120 ’\ — — —\_ i1202': ______ _ _ _ —120’:l:_ _ _ _ _ 5 ~z<______ 1203:- _ _ ________ 1203:______ \‘X 128i l:1I ( . J g 5,075S.F. " .. .‘ . M V ‘ . . . V ‘ , V.. ‘ ._ .. . . . . . . ‘.., .. ‘ “, J5 \ H .,1' l I LL] _____ I 3 ‘ ‘ .. -- -. _ , _ T- - . ‘ .. ‘. . . r'-.T_.:- - T, ‘ . . , . . E \ (J‘ EXISITIN‘G \' :1. f h a w 8" w a" w a" w " 8" w 8" v—28 8’ w _ 51¢ EDGES o ,' 593 ' 101: :t: ‘N‘ “ V‘> STREET 270 ~ 3: SW . I D —m_ . . , . l 53 — ‘5" 55 0fi 3 s — —— ..— — ' — — TsC’D— — 55 — —» 6.125s.F. H _ l O 4+ ' .3 ‘N‘ m ;:1l =- . n: - ‘H ~ . j. r . I F 243 |~ g . . . 10 at \\ 1,” .... to F ~.-. L ‘_ ........ ‘ /_ , . _ . mm m;% a: :H' ,rr- n+4 m [I 939. _52’i_____ 52_’i_____ 50_'i_ _ _ _ 5_0’i_ _ __ _ _50'_i _ _ _ _50_’i_ _ _ _ 5_0’i_ _ _ |<—10’PUE ‘1 : I l 1' - I; 1013+ l r l / 211 ‘4“ a L ~ l l ('7) I I ’ 51564S-F- H +4 .44 44 H M E ‘8?' 592 b?) . l44 .. .,_ l 44 . . . 7. :l: { < -- . , r I - 6 N A Q 5 242 2. 1:; 2— “ 5 “ “ ‘- L ' { "" J I V '9 ’6 50758F [‘0 .‘f I SH 0 9 ‘— 9 52 O :H :H ‘7‘ — 5 _ __ _ _ I V ,, ‘ ® 0. %\ x. 2 ' - - m 54 236 5 235 _ 234 233 232 231 230 229 _ 228 227 226 225 224 223 222 221 5 220 5 219 “‘ M“ M / , -' . _ . l 0" \§\$ <§ V- <( .55 I "’ f} 5 6,091SF. ‘- 6,233SF. 5,027SF. 5,027S.F. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. \ 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027s.F. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. ‘— 6,233SF. ‘— 5,609S.F. “ ’ ' ' 3 - ’3'i ' l . ' «Q‘EFI’OQOO "5 Lu ‘2‘? '0’i I sé , $ I I flVERACOURT v; : 1' l 6* n. 3
‘L:“14 241 l fi 'i I 5LE7 :.- i I I g LL] .3 *0 59753;. It?) | 62’i 62’:l: 50’1 50’1 50’1 50’1 50’:l: \ 50’:l: 50’1 50’1 50’: 50’: 50’:l: 50’:l: so’i 50’1 62’:l: 55’:l: | , »- I I l > {’3 10’PUE—>'-_ 7 3-1? I ‘ l S =ff_.r J . B < z "if'? I \ I 8 F . _ . _ . < E 101H: | ff .. V . I
_H I I E :lH +l +| \ +l /’-H/ "— ‘— K ‘3 'H +| ! ? I a: V, I II E o 2. 240 [SH m °° ~+l :H :H “o :H “o b “ :H ’\N :H b b 5H -+' -H .‘H .0 j. .. E to 5075sF :5 -m 2: 1'3 90 :H 8 8 8 9 8 O \ ‘9 / 8 8 N 8 9 9 8 8 :H b 003 3'3 3 f I ' 590 I I LLI ~l ’ ' ' I in if"; I 201 8 202 “ 203 “ 204 ‘— 205 206 ‘- 207 F 208 209 '— 210 “ 21 F 212 213 214 F 215 F 216 8 217 S2 218 | < 3 I— EXISTING I > "J I ' _3 I 6,333SF. ‘— 6,229SF. 5,023SF. 5,023SF. 5,023SF. 5,023SF. 5,023SF. 5,023S.F\ 5,027}. 5,023SF. 5,023.F. 5,023SF. 5,023s.F. 5,023SF. 5,023SF. 5,023s.F. ‘— 6,229SF. 5,3158.F. I l~ in Z ; WATER VALVE I I: m 1013: 2:: . l ’— .\ / , I "'" 1 g m l .. V ‘ '—+— . _ . _ . I < LL fl I I ants, u I . '5 o .5 239 ’9 1:1 I I Lu D:
5,075SF. V ._ 589 ‘ I~ L2“
101':I: ll ' g
+l * -. — ’ fi—‘ 13 238 A "I l I‘ 5,075S.F. ', , i
101’i I 553 LLI . l f l l wort ' . :E:
.44 .44 .44 .H .44 - :H .44 fi .44 fi .44 M I 4 " . . . ' '3: f8 5' 237 5+ 5 ‘5 § 5 ‘5 9 6 8 § 5 § '5 .44 44 “o 4 9": ' ' 1 1,, 5.577S-F- 200 5 199 _ 198 _ 197 196 F 195 F 194 193 _ 192 '- 191\ 190 189 F 188 187 .. 186 185 5 184 -_ 183 mi 5025 F I . I O _L 6,069s.F. r- 6,233S.F. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027s.F. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027s.F. 5,027S.F. 5,027SF. 5,027s.F. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. 5,027SF. ‘— 6,233SF. 2 5,586SF. I ' ' J 1 " ‘ ' 2 _ _ 90,1_____ ll 1 _ _ 552 I ' .. .. i ... l voo‘etIf 1. 6q Z ’ —>' 30oo’ " 9 fl” 4 STREET L :H: , . f ' «\$?‘$C9' 96 E o 56’ 8 5 l‘\ _._ l 00$\</§ LIJ E I 5,025.F. l ‘ . «?&$1’ 00 _l n: l [I J I ., 9 $9 |: O ,. o r—10'PUE10 i ’ v : : 551 ll - 8 l- .. ‘3 DJ .fl :4 b l » I r I n: I o, 165 8 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 74 175 176 177 178 179 180 g 181 182 Ln| 50323;. I,O a, ‘ , D- ‘0 LO 1 64 6,333 s.F. ‘— 6,229 SF. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 s.F. 5,023 SF. 5,023 SF. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 SF. 5,023 SF. 5, 3 SF. 5,023 SF. 5,023 SF. 5,023 SF. 5,023 SF. 5,023 s.F. 5,023 SF. \— 6,229 S.F. 5,315 s.F. 1 ‘ . . __ . - 5828s F I I . _ , j - - . l 1 lg "s --' ‘ I Dr.By: JP/JRJ . N r l 1o’ PUE 10 :l: a - \ II or ‘I II I :1 550 l . Ch.By: AB 101’i 23.: ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— a :H ’ .. . . I l l ‘ " " 8| 7 ‘ U ,LI' -' ': I Date: 10/27/25
:3: 163 ” " " ” ” " " " ’ " " l | Mg, ‘l I' WATER VALVE ' Scale: AsNoted 6,231 S.F. , — _ I - _l I 1: I . . ‘ . ’ ' ” ” ' J? j ll 11,0? / ,4: * I ll J ‘1 SCALE:1"= 50’ YHJobNo. 25-142 H?“ ' =5: . +|| I ~o' ' ' ' 101': ;. -N 8 l . I l i H"2' I 529 I ' o 25 50 100 SheetNo. _2_ (0 6,231.F. E(0 5 [l l l ——————————————————————————————— . l r: \ |Inf-1:1! ] 1 l of 3 Sheets M_SHEET 2.dwg 42 TI"
Map\25—1 F:\2025\25-142\dwg\Maps\Tentative
7 5,025 S.F. 8 6,231 S.F. 9 5,564 S.F. 10 5,565 S.F. 17 5,123 S.F. 18 6,530 S.F. 19 5,599 S.F. 28 5,577 S.F. 32 5,025 S.F. 33 5,025 S.F. 34 5,025 S.F. 35 5,025 S.F. 36 5,025 S.F. 37 5,025 S.F. 38 5,025 S.F. 39 7,564 S.F. 43 5,025 S.F. 44 6,357 S.F. 45 6,231 S.F. 46 5,025 S.F. 47 5,025 S.F. 48 5,025 S.F. 49 5,025 S.F. 50 5,025 S.F. 51 5,025 S.F. 52 5,025 S.F. 53 5,025 S.F. 54 5,025 S.F. 55 5,025 S.F. 56 5,025 S.F. 57 5,025 S.F. 58 5,025 S.F. 59 5,025 S.F. 60 6,231 S.F. 61 5,338 S.F. 79 6,067 S.F. 80 6,333 S.F. 81 6,229 S.F. 82 5,023 S.F. 83 5,023 S.F. 84 5,023 S.F. 85 5,023 S.F. 86 5,023 S.F. 87 5,023 S.F. 88 5,023 S.F. 89 5,023 S.F. 90 5,023 S.F. 91 5,023 S.F. 92 5,023 S.F. 93 5,023 S.F. 94 5,023 S.F. 95 5,023 S.F. 96 6,229 S.F. 97 5,315 S.F. 115 6,069 S.F. 116 6,333 S.F. 117 6,229 S.F. 118 5,023 S.F. 119 5,023 S.F. 120 5,023 S.F. 121 5,023 S.F. 122 5,023 S.F. 123 5,023 S.F. 124 5,023 S.F. 125 5,023 S.F. 126 5,023 S.F. 127 5,023 S.F. 128 5,023 S.F. 129 5,023 S.F. 130 5,023 S.F. 131 5,023 S.F. 132 6,229 S.F. 133 5,315 S.F. 151 6,069 S.F. 152 5,025 S.F. 153 6,231 S.F. 154 6,231 S.F. 155 5,025 S.F. 156 5,025 S.F. 157 5,025 S.F. 158 5,025 S.F. 159 5,025 S.F. 160 5,025 S.F. 161 5,025 S.F. 162 6,231 S.F. 163 6,231 S.F. 40 14,446 S.F. 41 7,561 S.F. 12 5,276 S.F. 13 5,276 S.F. 14 5,276 S.F. 15 5,125 S.F.20 5,651 S.F. 21 5,025 S.F. 22 6,231 S.F. 23 5,025 S.F. 24 5,025 S.F. 25 5,025 S.F. 26 5,025 S.F. 27 5,025 S.F. 29 5,577 S.F. 30 6,231 S.F. 31 5,025 S.F. 42 5,025 S.F. 134 5,586 S.F. 135 6,233 S.F. 136 5,027 S.F. 137 5,027 S.F. 138 5,027 S.F. 139 5,027 S.F. 140 5,027 S.F. 141 5,027 S.F. 142 5,027 S.F. 143 5,027 S.F. 144 5,027 S.F. 145 5,027 S.F. 146 5,027 S.F. 147 5,027 S.F. 148 5,027 S.F. 149 5,027 S.F. 150 6,233 S.F. 114 6,233 S.F. 113 5,027 S.F. 112 5,027 S.F. 111 5,027 S.F. 110 5,027 S.F. 109 5,027 S.F. 108 5,027 S.F. 107 5,027 S.F. 106 5,027 S.F. 105 5,027 S.F. 104 5,027 S.F. 103 5,027 S.F. 102 5,027 S.F. 101 5,027 S.F. 100 5,027 S.F. 99 6,233 S.F. 98 5,586 S.F. 11 6,533 S.F. 16 6,293 S.F. 62 5,584 S.F. 63 6,231 S.F. 64 5,025 S.F. 65 5,025 S.F. 66 5,025 S.F. 67 5,025 S.F. 68 5,025 S.F. 69 5,025 S.F. 70 5,025 S.F. 71 5,025 S.F. 72 5,025 S.F. 73 5,025 S.F. 74 5,025 S.F. 75 5,025 S.F. 76 5,025 S.F. 77 5,025 S.F. 78 6,231 S.F. CASTANEDA

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

Ch. By: Date: Scale: As Noted YH Job No. Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Jared Jones Plot Date: 11/3/2025 File Location: F:\2025\25-142\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\25-142_TTM_SHEET 3.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM JP/JRJ AB 10/27/25 25-142 3 3 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6541
NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELMONT AVENUE AND STATE ROUTE 33 MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 2 TRACT MAP 6146 EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 529 528550 527 526 510 509 508 507 TRACT MAP 6111 EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 271 272 270 269 TRACT MAP 5826 EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 160 161 159 623:
503: 50':l: 50':l: 503: 50':l: 50':l:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

IN FRESNO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
SHEET 3 OF 3
101,1:
ing, Inc.
l
550 I I
l
I
633?; :13: I ww—26'— " " " " — MATCHLINE-SEESHEET2 — " ., ' .. , _. I 92, BE \ 8' = = l g @ STREETSE\ — 101’:l: I ' - .. , . so 1 62 6,231 S.F.

Jr JI \ | Jr l . "'1‘ HI ————— — — — — — — — JV — — — — — — — — — _ 44 K 50’:l: 50’:l: 5032 50’:l: 50'1 _ 11;:o 7 7‘ 8 Q ~ (0 6,231 S.F. (I (O
|<-10'PUE /
l
1003:

II'IEEI'
.
.'
JL;
135
6,233 S.F.
134
5,586 S.F.
1013:
150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 136 6,233 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 1012!:
151
101’:l: 6,069 S.F. 7161
5,025 S.F.
\ 101’:l:

Rm
5025 F. ' \
l
l
l
i
l
l
l
l
l
101} \ \L
:28' ‘ ' ' , CAS ANEDA(
_28:STR ET‘WW I]
'Jl z .a 1’‘79: 7.7.13.5 tiri— ‘ ‘ ‘ in
" (If?““““ 86’i 7-] #154 [/- f r ______________ 5LE I :7. _-,l‘ r K . . 116 6,333 S.F. 100':|:
117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 \ 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 6,229 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 6,229 S.F. 5,315 S.F. 1 20I 5,565.F.
01 ,.m
159
5,025 S.F. *526
‘EMSHNG
'WAHHQVAUE
101 ’:l:
/
5,;ESF/
/
1013 I;"_*} _____________________________________________ . 6,533 S.F. l ll!l 101E l
I
I
157
5,02F S.F. l
l
l | : 101'} l 5" l ..
l
l
510 \
509 »/\
\\
101':l:
5,276 .F.
101':l:

O1
1013:
1013:
101':l:
1013:
101':l:
99 98
6,233 S.F. 5,586 S.F.
110 109 108 107 F 106 105 104 103 102 101 100
6,233 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 5,027 S.F. 115 113 112 111
6,069 S.F.
114
1013:
101':l:
101’:l:
\
\ 62':l: 62':l: 50'1 50':l: 50': 50':l: 50’1 50’1 50':l: 50’1 \ 50’1 50’:l: 50':l: 50':l: 50’1 50'1 62':l: 55': l 5’LE——l — :3} l ' \ $ $ ' “Dori W
\ c» -;-"?'r 1 l ., 00 3'; : ff lnI 5,276.F.
5,315S.F. '3: I
l iii-1:;3
l
I
’5’
153
5,025 S.F. 1
‘t 5,276 S.F.
101'1 |\ l
155
l
I
5,025S.F. I
l
I
l
I
01 I.m
N1'38'04”E 1661.81’
100':l:
1003:
1003:
1003:
100':|:
1003:
1003:
1003:
1003:
1003:
1003:
1003:
1003:
1003:
96 6,229 S.F.
80 6,333 S.F.
1003:
1003:
1003:
(ON 6,229 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 5,023 S.F. 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 1012!:

E's-Z no -*> r—10'PUE100'i 4
\—7——'88':l:'—+——————89’i———— fi t an 154 6,231 S.F. . / 507 1013: 153 6,231 S.F. 6,293 FF. 101:1: 101':l: 272 63 6,231 S.F. 1013:
101':l:
152
5,025 S.F.
79 6,067 S.F.
17'
5,123S.F.
101’:l:
78 \ 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 ‘9 66 65 64
6,231 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. ,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,584 S.F. EXISTING

WATER VALVES
_'SDMH______'___ - V. ‘ RIM=(169.87)
‘01 30.0” - ‘
mI
\ lll 101’:l: l \ 43 ll 62’:l: 62’:l: / 50’1 50':l: 50':l: 50’1 50’1 50’1 50’1 50’1 50’: 50’1 50’1 50’: 50’1 50’:l: 62:1: 55’: 5,025 S.F. I 5’LE l 101':l:
1013:
1013:
1003:
1003:
1003:
1003:
1003:
1013:
1003:
1013:
1013:
1013: \
1013:
1013:
42 5,025 S.F.
60 6,231 S.F.
61 5,338 S.F.
1013:
1013:
_H
44 :5 / 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59
6,357 S.F. /' 6,231 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 7,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. /
’____——.—___——._———__-_—_——_____._—_—__-_————_—__—-_—————-_—— 101'1
101': 10’PUE /
269 \ 41
7,561 S.F. 7
____/_1
/
N5 ac
77 ‘1
v;_‘ __‘. -_'.

Dr. By: JP/JRJ I
N 9! “2.
0°. 1V
8 W
\. .+| F Ch. By: AB O‘_
\\
1003:
1003:
1013:
10 ’d:
100'
1013:
1013:
1003:
1013:
1003:
40 14,446 S.F. _ 30 6,231 S.F. 29 5,577 S.F. “ 28 \ 27 26 25 24 22 21 20 5,577 S.F. 5 025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,231 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,651 S.FOC \ 63 I 22,, \. Q“5’LE :H
8 K
Nw
1003:
1003:
100':I:
:H8 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 39 I 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. 5,025 S.F. \Q N «4 Date: 10/27/25 7,564 S.F. .°°U,
‘z l v o 0‘ $ «3‘0$\$ 0<9 Scale: AsNoted
-172’ 1 , l
IF1/ 515—»:«— /(I
119% 88':l: 50':l: 50':l: 50':l: 50’:l: 50’:l: 50'i 50': 50': 521 563: ' 56’:l: 50': 50’:l: 50’: 50’:l: 50’:l: 62’:l: 50':l: 563:
389'54’08”E1296.52' . l .m “p . l
\ _ :l: 1m7 HHIIIK 1.?ll
YH Job No. 25-142
Sheet No. 3
of _3_ Sheets
Plot PlotBy:Jare
one
F:\2025\25-142\dwg\Maps\Tentative
_TTM_SHEET 3.dwg
-NOTE- This map is for Assessment purposes only. It is not to be construed as portraying legal ownership or divisions of land for purposes of zoning or subdivision law. x 27 26 FOR. SEC'S. 34, 35 & 36 T. 13 8., R. 14 E, M. D. B. 8:M. (16% I W 26 25 833.29' 34 35 2656.50’ 1130.60’ 35 35 ’3;0' AP-1745 €932). I @S 36' 33%,, 62.49Ac. 3220' / W.W.D. .ST 308.86Ac. [<3 W.W.D. 3% @ST (199) 246.02Ac. :3 ‘ié £52 :2; 612' W.W.D. 9 T 11.84Ac. 34 35 35 36 3 2 2 1 Agricultural preserve Parcel Map No. - Bk. 10, Pg. 38 Record of Survey - Bk. 60, P98. 88-90 12/30/2025 SL Tax Rate Area 12-001140-000 12-015140-013 012-19, 1"=eoo' _ W W _ 25 30 l_ 36 31 (39 6:2 J 6? ea fl_ (39 (22 F l (29» (33’ v CITY OF CITY OF WWD MENDOTAMENDOTA ' ' ' ST (2% @a J - c- / 61/40. . 306.78Ac. __ _-~_ g \ Bk. CITYOF [ m 5% (2b 013 MENDOTA _' _ 910.04' ‘ 664.76' R V ' H E.CITYOF §§ / g @s 4.61Ac. “1:152:53“ %ii: E 2.50Ac.|’ /@ HA.C.F. /- 284.929 ' S 408.83%} 8' 10.00Ac. 3T 5,»- m \ 0.55AC. 533.; ‘3; 50, ' 5.01' :2 q? 92.28. 3:54 $ D48514!). HA.C.F. “720 (‘6’ " “ ST 6 k :06)RS60-88635.23 @ _\ v_n-,' P. 3_ _70 W W'SD 0.88AC. /‘t/J\({?/\6 (Lb N6 (Ii-5:) 185.38' L.66A’g:33INI & 30'W 5 . 580 V @ T / r55" ,3 r9“ (2-58)185.40' ED®§2§§EOW 62.89Ac. S ,0 (9?" “R . 83g? ‘— . OAC. 7.23/40. ‘99 $.5n; 613- 3 ' ’64“ 2.85Ac. 3.MAC. . AVE. (Ba H.A.C.F.- HOUSING AUTHORITY OF FRESNOCOUNTY 1 019 v Assessor's Map Bk. 012 - Pg. 19 County of Fresno, Calif. Note - Assessor's Block Numbers Shown in Ellipses Assessor's Parcel Numbers Shown in Circles —'- ”U l C This map is for Assessment purposes only. at U 5. 25, 26, Agricultural Preserve Record of Survey - Bk. 68, Pg. 56-66 H 11/07/2024 MR 25R 7.738.,RI4E’. 8 FOR.SEC.30 T53, R.I5E. M.D.B.8 M. [2 [6 It is not t9 be cgqgtrued as portraa legal Tax Area ownershipor dmsrons of land for purposes ’2 _ 6 of zoningor subdivisionlaw. 0’ I2 - 018 140 -000 ' 140-00! : I40 - 013 (/I ) 19449' 24 '9 I”: 800’ 231'” \J Ammo: 135355 :: 222100.05- ’ ’- ’Jv’z4669. £33,151”. 2fl251‘ :\ \ la 7’10" . ‘P‘IJB ‘ - 3%. \ \\ "3. ‘3. \\ \\ \ \\\ AP- [7458 325.94 Ac. Q8 @ 3‘, 198. 54Ac. % s. 53 g. i gs' 55 fl W-W-D- 6-95 A“ 2 AP-1745 ME CITYOF \ 37 MENDom ~.,__ .3 ““1 128.58Ac. GT \ § 3.02Ac \ g" 286.08Ac ”,5 _ 9,, ' 3.? , if at“ § 3 if BASS AVE 50"53‘ '0 ’ ‘3‘ I W W D \ . J' va'lr ”1.99- sgefl 0. 100.60 L a 25 £33933“ til-é a: 27 26 36“"“9' ' ' ' 34 35 35 36 ST l 636 Ac a Assessor‘s Map Bk. 12 —Pg.16 County of Fresno, Calif. A NOTE -Assessor's Block Numbers Shown in Ellipses. A--‘-“_‘A n

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians
Carol Bill, Chairperson
P.O. Box 209
Tollhouse, CA, 93667
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Carol Bill:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians
Carol Bill, Chairperson
PO. Box 209
Tollhouse, CA, 93667
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Carol Bill:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

Fresno, CA, 93705
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Robert Ledger:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
Dumna Wo-Wah Tribal Government
Robert Ledger, Chairperson
2191 West Pico Ave.

Fresno, CA, 93705
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Robert Ledger:

The project proposes the development of a 271-Iot residential subdivision on an approximately 53.43-acre portion of Assessor’sParcel Numbers 012-190-255T and 012-160-255T (project site). The project site is located outside the City of Mendota’s current city limits and its Sphere of Influence, adjacent to the west side of Amador Avenue and the western extent of the existing city limits. In addition to the 271single-family residential lot tentative subdivision map, the project includes a request to annex the project site into the City of Mendota and to amend the City’s Sphere of Influence to include the project site. Additionally, the project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN012-190-255T to Medium Density Residential while concurrently amending the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN012-190-255T to the R-1 zone district (Single-Family/Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation.

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
Kings River Choinumni Farm Tribe
Stan Alec,
3515 East Fedora Avenue
Fresno, CA, 93726
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Stan Alec:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
KingsRiver Choinumni Farm Tribe
Stan Alec,
3515 East Fedora Avenue
Fresno, CA, 93726
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Stan Alec:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt am
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’sMap
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
52' R/W LOCAL STREET SECTION 56' R/W LOCAL STREET SECTION 84' R/W COLLECTOR STREET SECTION Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
Elaine Fink, Chairperson
P.O. Box 929
North Fork, CA, 93643
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Elaine Fink:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
Elaine Fink, Chairperson
PO. Box 929
North Fork, CA, 93643
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Elaine Fink:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Timothy Perez,
P.O. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Timothy Perez:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Timothy Perez,
P.O. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Timothy Perez:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Katherine Perez, Chairperson
P.O. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Katherine Perez:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
North Valley Yokuts Tribe
Katherine Perez, Chairperson
PO. Box 717
Linden, CA, 95236
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Katherine Perez:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe
Leo Sisco, Chairperson
P.O. Box 8
Lemoore, CA, 93245
Subject: Notification pursuant to Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Leo Sisco:

The City of Mendota is processing an application for the above-referenced project and is requesting your review to determine if formal consultation is appropriate pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1 (Assembly Bill 52) and Government Code Section 65352.3 (Senate Bill 18).

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project site are attached for your reference.

Pursuant to Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18, the tribe has 30 and 90 days, respectfully, to request formal consultation. The 30-day window under Assembly Bill 52 begins from the date that this letter is received. The 90-day window under Senate Bill 18 begins from the date on which this letter is sent. Given the timelines involved in preparing project materials, the required public review periods, conducting the requisite hearings, and finalizing the applications combined with the community’s need for quality affordable housing, we respectfully request that the Tribe consider the items herein as expeditiously as possible.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe
LeoSisco,Chairperson
P.O. Box 8
Lemoore, CA, 93245
Subject: Notification pursuant to Assembly Bill 52 and Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Leo Sisco:

The City of Mendota is processing an application for the above-referenced project and is requesting your review to determine if formal consultation is appropriate pursuant to Public ResourcesCodeSection 21080.3.1 (Assembly Bill 52) and Government CodeSection 65352.3 (Senate Bill 18).

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project site are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
Table Mountain Rancheria
Brenda Lavell, Chairperson
P.O. Box 410
Friant, CA, 93626
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Brenda Lavell:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
Table Mountain Rancheria
Brenda Lavell, Chairperson
PO. Box 410
Friant, CA, 93626
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Brenda Lavell:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
Traditional Choinumni Tribe
David Alvarez, Chairperson
2415 E. Houston Avenue
Fresno, CA, 93720
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear David Alvarez:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
Traditional Choinumni Tribe
David Alvarez, Chairperson
2415 E. Houston Avenue
Fresno, CA, 93720
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear David Alvarez:

The project proposes the development of a 271-Iot residential subdivision on an approximately 53.43-acre portion of Assessor’sParcel Numbers 012-190-255T and 012-160-255T (project site). The project site is located outside the City of Mendota’s current city limits and its Sphere of Influence, adjacent to the west side of Amador Avenue and the western extent of the existing city limits. In addition to the 271single-family residential lot tentative subdivision map, the project includes a request to annex the project site into the City of Mendota and to amend the City’s Sphere of Influence to include the project site. Additionally, the project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN012-190-255T to Medium Density Residential while concurrently amending the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN012-190-255T to the R-1 zone district (Single-Fami/Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation.

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
643 Quince Street Mendota, CA 93640
Telephone: (559) 655-3291 Fresno Line: (559) 266-6456 Fax: (559) 655-4064 www.ci.mendota.ca.us TDD/TTY 866-735-2929 (English) TDD/TTY 866-833-4703 (Spanish) April 13, 2026
Tule River Indian Tribe
Neil Peyron, Chairperson
P.O. Box 589
Porterville, CA, 93258
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Neil Peyron:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
Tule River Indian Tribe
Neil Peyron, Chairperson
P.O. Box 589
Porterville, CA, 93258
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Neil Peyron:

The project proposes the development of a 271-Iot residential subdivision on an approximately 53.43-acre portion of Assessor’sParcel Numbers 012-190-255T and 012-160-255T (project site). The project site is located outside the City of Mendota’s current city limits and its Sphere of Influence, adjacent to the west side of Amador Avenue and the western extent of the existing city limits. In addition to the 271single-family residential lot tentative subdivision map, the project includes a request to annex the project site into the City of Mendota and to amend the City’s Sphere of Influence to include the project site. Additionally, the project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN012-190-255T to Medium Density Residential while concurrently amending the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN012-190-255T to the R-1 zone district (Single-Fami/Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation.

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

Salinas, CA, 93906
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Kenneth Woodrow:

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’s Map for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

Respectfully,
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
Assistant City Planner
Attachments: Subdivision Map
Assessor’s Map
Copy: Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
1942 \V 4/ NM

CITY OF MENDOTA
“Cantaloupe Center of The World”
April 13, 2026
Wuksache Indian Tribe/Eshom Valley Band
Kenneth Woodrow, Chairperson
1179 Rock Haven Ct.

Salinas, CA, 93906
Subject: Notification pursuant to Senate Bill 18 for the Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA
Dear Kenneth Woodrow:

The project proposes the development of a 271-Iot residential subdivision on an approximately 53.43-acre portion of Assessor’sParcel Numbers 012-190-255T and 012-160-255T (project site). The project site is located outside the City of Mendota’s current city limits and its Sphere of Influence, adjacent to the west side of Amador Avenue and the western extent of the existing city limits. In addition to the 271single-family residential lot tentative subdivision map, the project includes a request to annex the project site into the City of Mendota and to amend the City’s Sphere of Influence to include the project site. Additionally, the project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN012-190-255T to Medium Density Residential while concurrently amending the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN012-190-255T to the R-1 zone district (Single-Fami/Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation.

The application also requests the project be processed as a planned development.

A copy of the proposed subdivision map and the Assessor’sMap for the project are attached for your reference.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments at 559.449.2700 or at [email protected].

Thank you.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Ref. & Rev.

N . , EB N89'54’08”W \ 41.51 30, TAGGEDU.R. BEGINNING. ADVANTAGEOFNATURAL HEATING ANDCOOLINGOPPORTUNITIES. > m C

STREET A

STREET B

STREET C STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

N1'38'O4"E 1661.81’
50':l: 503:
82'd:

Ref. & Rev.

VESTING

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
TRACT1%. 65%
(A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT)

This project locaƟon in the City of Mendota, Fresno County is out of our historical land base.

Therefore we are unable to make any comment on the said project.

If you have quesƟons, please don't hesitate to call or email.

Regards,
David Alvarez, Tribal Chairman
TradiƟonal Choinumni Tribe
2415 E. Houston Ave.

Fresno, CA. 93720
c: 559.217.0396
e: [email protected]
Wyatt Czeshinski
From: David Alvarez <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday,April 16, 2026 11:36AM
To: Wyatt Czeshinski
Subject: RE:Tract 6541 Project,City of Mendota, FresnoCounty, CA. [Youdon't often get email from [email protected] why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ]
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
RE: Tract 6541 Project, City of Mendota, Fresno County, CA.

This project location in the City of Mendota, FresnoCounty is out of our historical land base.

Therefore we are unable to make any comment on the said project.

If you have questions, please don't hesitate to call or email.

Regards,
David Alvarez, Tribal Chairman
Traditional Choinumni Tribe
2415 E. Houston Ave.

Fresno, CA. 93720
c: 559.217.0396
e: [email protected]
$5 Michene Heredia-Cordova Tribal Chairperson Richard L. Jones Tribal Vice-Chairperson Jenna Gosselaar Tribal Secretary/Treasurer Samantha Toles-Rodriguez Tribal Council Member-At-Large Mark Martinezm _ TABLEMOUNTAINRANCHERIA TRIBAL GOVERNMENT OFFICE May6,2026 City of Mendota Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP 643 Quince Street Mendota, Ca. 93640 RE: Tract 6541 Proj ect,-Mendota, Fresno County, Ca. To: Wyatt Czeshinski, This is in response to your letter dated April13, 2026, regarding Tract 6541 Project, Mendota, Fresno County, Ca. Thank you for notifying us of the potential development and the request for consultation. We decline participation at this time but would appreciate being notified in the unlikely event that cultural resources are identified. Sincerely, Tribal Council Member-At-Large fl/l‘ 23736 Sky Harbour Road Post Office Box 410 Friant California 93626 (559) 822-2587 Fax (559) 822-2693 Maymanah Farhat Cultural Resources Manager mfarhat@tmrflg 559.325.0351 Appendix
Appendix
D - Traffic
Study Appendix
Appendix D - Traffic Study

TRAFFIC STUDY
Proposed Residential Development
West of Amador Avenue
Mendota, California
Prepared For:

Crown Homes
5320 East Pine Avenue
Fresno, California 93727
Date:

June 8, 2026
Job No.:
25-040.01

TRAFFIC STUDY
Proposed Residential Development
West of Amador Avenue
Mendota, California
Prepared For:

Crown Homes
5320 East Pine Avenue
Fresno, California 93727
Date:

June 8, 2026
Job No.:
25-04001

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
862 Pollasky Avenue ♦ Clovis, California 93612 ♦ (559) 299-1544 ♦ www.peters-engineering.com Mr. Joseph Crown June 8, 2026
Crown Homes
5320 East Pine Avenue
Fresno, California 93727
Subject: Traffic Study
Proposed Residential Development
West of Amador Avenue
Mendota, California
Dear Mr. Crown:

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a traffic study for a proposed residential development in Mendota, California. This study focuses on the anticipated effect of vehicle traffic resulting from the Project and includes a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) screening. The traffic study was prepared in general conformance with City of Mendota requirements.

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed single-family residential subdivision covers approximately 49.99 acres located west of the existing segment of Amador Avenue, extending roughly from north of Gonzalez Street to south of Silva Street. The Project proposes 271 single-family homes. Access to the site will be via three local streets connecting to Amador Avenue. It is our understanding that the Project will also extend Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue with one lane in each direction.

The Project site location is presented in the attached Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map, and the Project site plan is presented in the attached Figure 2, Site Plan.

3.0 STUDY AREA AND TIME PERIOD
A scoping letter requesting agency comments on the scope of the traffic study was prepared on October 8, 2025. The scoping letter and agency responses are presented in Appendix A.

The study locations and the requirements of the analyses were identified on cooperation with City of Mendota and Caltrans staff. This report includes operational analysis of the following intersections:

1. Oller Street (SR 180) and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

2. Smoot Avenue and Sorenson Avenue

3. Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

4. Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue Extension

5. Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

6. Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Mr. Joseph Crown June 8, 2026
Crown Homes
5 320 East Pine Avenue
Fresno, California 93727
Subject: Traffic Study
Proposed Residential Development
West of Amador Avenue
Mendota, California
Dear Mr. Crown:

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed single-family residential subdivision covers approximately 49.99 acres located west of the existing segment of Amador Avenue, extending roughly from north of Gonzalez Street to south of Silva Street. The Project proposes 271 single—family homes. Access to the site will be Via three local streets connecting to Amador Avenue. It is our understanding that the Project will also extend Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue with one lane in each direction.

The Project site location is presented in the attached Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map, and the Project site plan is presented in the attached Figure 2, Site Plan.

1. Oller Street (SR 180) and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
Smoot Avenue and Sorenson Avenue
Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue Extension
Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180) 99:59!“
862 Pollasky Avenue 0 Clovis, California 93612 O (559) 299—1544 9 WWW.peters—engineering.com Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 2
The study time periods include the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours determined between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. The peak hours are analyzed for the following conditions:
• Existing Conditions;
• Existing-Plus-Project Conditions;
• Near-Term Conditions With Project (Includes Approved and Pending Projects); and • Long-Term (Year 2047) Conditions With Project.

4.0 OPERATIONAL ANALYSES CRITERIA

4.1 Level of Service
The Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual, 7 th Edition, (HCM) defines
level of service (LOS) as, “A quantitative stratification of a performance measure or measures that represent quality of service, measured on an A-F scale, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions from the traveler’s perspective and LOS F the worst.” Automobile mode LOS characteristics for both unsignalized and signalized intersections are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1
Level of Service Characteristics for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)
A 0-10
B >10-15
C >15-25
D >25-35
E >35-50
F >50
Table 2
Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of
Service Description Average Vehicle
Delay (seconds)
A
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. <10 B
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is very short. >10-20
C
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is favorable or cycle length is moderate. >20-35
D
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is ineffective or cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.
>35-55
E
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is unfavorable and cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >55-80 F
Volume-to-capacity ratio is greater than 1.0. Progression is very poor and cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. >80 Reference for Tables 1 and 2: Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022 TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page2
The study time periods include the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours determined between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. The peak hours are analyzed for the following conditions:

Existing Conditions;
Existing-Plus-Project Conditions;
Near-Term Conditions With Project (Includes Approved and Pending Projects); and Long-Term (Year 2047) Conditions With Project.

4.0 OPERATIONAL ANALYSES CRITERIA

4.1 Level of Service
The Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual, 7” Edition, (HCM) defines level of service (LOS) as, “A quantitative stratification of a performance measure or measures that represent quality of service, measured on an A—F scale, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions from the traveler’s perspective and LOS F the worst.” Automobile mode LOS characteristics for both unsignalized and signalized intersections are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1
Level of Service Characteristics for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)
A 0—10
B >10-15
C >15-25
D >25-35
E >35-50
F >50
Table 2
Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of Descri tion Average Vehicle
Service p Delay (seconds)
Volume—to—capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is A exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. <10 B Volume—to—capacity ratio is 119greater than 1.0. Progression is highly >10_20 favorable or the cycle length 1s very short.

C Volume—to—capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is favorable or >20_35 cycle length is moderate.

Volume—to—capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is D ineffective or cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle >35-55 failures are noticeable.

Volume—to—capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is E unfavorable and cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >55-80 Volume—to—capacity ratio is greater than 1.0. Progression is very poor and cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue.

Reference for Tables 1 and 2: Highway Capacity Manual, 7’71 Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022 F >80
Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 3

4.1.1 City of Mendota
Policy C-1.2 of the City of Mendota General Plan states that the City shall: “Seek to maintain operations on all roadways and intersections at Level of Service C or better at all times, including peak travel times, unless maintaining this Level of Service would, in the City's judgment, be infeasible and/or conflict with the achievement of other goals.

Congestion in excess of Level of Service C may be accepted in these cases, provided that provisions are made to improve traffic flow and/or promote non-vehicular transportation as part of a development project or a City-initiated project.”

4.1.2 State Highways
Caltrans has historically endeavored to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D, but does not currently identify a specific LOS goal.

4.1.3 Study Criteria
For purposes of this study, a traffic issue may require improvements if the proposed Project will decrease the LOS below C at a City of Mendota intersection, or if the Project will exacerbate conditions at a City of Mendota intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS D to LOS E).

For purposes of this study, a traffic issue will be recognized at State facilities if the analyses identify LOS E or F at an intersection. LOS E and F can be indicative of delays that may lead to safety concerns at unsignalized intersections. A traffic issue will also be identified if the Project will exacerbate conditions at State intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS E to LOS F).

4.2 Intersection Queuing Criteria
A queuing deficiency is identified in the existing condition if the calculated 95th -percentile
queue length exceeds the storage length by more than 25 feet (the average storage length for one vehicle) since the bay taper can typically store one vehicle. A queuing issue is determined if the Project causes the calculated 95th
-percentile queue length to exceed the
existing or planned storage capacity of a lane by more than 25 feet. In storage lanes that are already deficient without the Project, a queuing issue is determined if the Project increases the calculated 95th
-percentile queue length by at least 25 feet.

5.0 TRIP GENERATION

5.1 Project Vehicle Trip Generation
Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition, are typically used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by proposed projects. Table 3 presents the trip generation estimates for the Project.

TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page3

Congestion in excess of Level of Service C may be accepted in these cases, provided that provisions are made to improve traflic flow and/0r promote non-vehicular transportation as part of a development project or a Cily-initiatedpmject.”

4.1.2 State Highways
Caltrans has historically endeavored to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D, but does not currently identify a specific LOS goal.

4.2 Intersection Queuing Criteria
A queuing deficiency is identified in the existing condition if the calculated 95th—percentile queue length exceeds the storage length by more than 25 feet (the average storage length for one vehicle) since the bay taper can typically store one vehicle. A queuing issue is determined if the Project causes the calculated 95th—percentilequeue length to exceed the existing or planned storage capacity of a lane by more than 25 feet. In storage lanes that are already deficient Without the Project, a queuing issue is determined if the Project increases the calculated 95th-percentile queue length by at least 25 feet.

5.0 TRIP GENERATION

5.1 Proiect Vehicle Trip Generation
Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12”“ Edition, are typically used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by proposed projects. Table 3 presents the trip generation estimates for the Project.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 4
Table 3
Project Weekday Trip Generation
Land Use Size Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Rate Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Single-Family
Detached
Housing (210)
271 9.09 2,464 0.70 27:73 51 139 190 0.93 62:38 156 96 252 Reference: Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, August 2025

5.2 Project Vehicle Trip Distribution and Assignment
The distribution of project trips presented was estimated based on the results of previous traffic studies, available routes, the locations of complementary land uses, and engineering judgment. The estimated percentage distribution of Project trips is presented in Figure 3, Project Trip Distribution Percentages. The Project traffic volumes presented in Table 1 were assigned to the adjacent road network in accordance with the trip distribution percentages in Figure 3. The peak-hour Project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4, Project PeakHour Traffic Volumes.

6.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Existing peak-hour traffic volumes at the study intersections were determined by performing manual turning-movement counts between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. on a weekday. The counts included pedestrians, bicycles, and heavy vehicles. The data sheets are presented in the attached Appendix B and include the date the counts were performed. The existing peak-hour turning movement volumes are presented in Figure 5, Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

7.0 LANE CONFIGURATIONS AND INTERSECTION CONTROL
The lane configurations and intersection control at the study intersections are presented in Figure 6, Lane Configurations and Intersection Control. The lane configurations assumed for the extension of Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue are presented in Figure 6.

8.0 EXISTING-PLUS-PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The Project proposes to construct Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue, which will allow existing traffic volumes to redistribute. The estimated redistributed existing traffic volumes are presented in Figure 7, Redistributed Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

The existing-plus-Project peak-hour turning movement volumes are presented in Figure 8, Existing-Plus-Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes and are the result of adding the traffic volumes in Figures 4 and 7.

9.0 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS
The analyses for the near-term and long-term conditions consider trips expected to be generated by pending and approved projects in the study area. The following projects have been identified:
• Amador Avenue and Smoot Street Extension, which extends partial widths (two lanes in each direction) of Amador Avenue and Smoot Street from their current termini to the intersection of the two. This project is planned to be built in Spring 2026.

TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page4
Table 3
Proiect Weekdav Trip Generation
L nd U 8' Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour a se 116 Rate Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Single-Family
Detached 271 9.09 2,464 0.70 27:73 51 139 190 0.93 62:38 156 96 252 Housing (210)
Reference: Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, August 2025

5.2 Proiect Vehicle Trip Distribution and Assignment
The distribution of project trips presented was estimated based on the results of previous traffic studies, available routes, the locations of complementary land uses, and engineering judgment. The estimated percentage distribution of Project trips is presented in Figure 3, Project Trip Distribution Percentages. The Project traffic volumes presented in Table 1 were assigned to the adjacent road network in accordance with the trip distribution percentages in Figure 3. The peak-hour Project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4, Project Peak— Hour Traffic Volumes.

6.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Existing peak-hour traffic volumes at the study intersections were determined by performing manual turning-movement counts between 7:00 and 9:00 21.111.and between 4:00 and 6:00 pm. on a weekday. The counts included pedestrians, bicycles, and heavy vehicles. The data sheets are presented in the attached Appendix B and include the date the counts were performed. The existing peak-hour turning movement volumes are presented in Figure 5, Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

9.0 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS
The analyses for the near-term and long-term conditions consider trips expected to be generated by pending and approved projects in the study area. The following projects have been identified:
0 Amador Avenue and Smoot Street Extension, which extends partial Widths (two lanes in each direction) of Amador Avenue and Smoot Street from their current termini to the intersection of the two. This project is planned to be built in Spring 2026.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 5
• Tract 6305 - Belmont Estates, 315 single-family homes on 75.7 acres north of Belmont Avenue, south of the existing Las Palmas subdivision, and east of the proposed Amador Avenue alignment.

10.0 NEAR-TERM TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The near-term traffic volumes with the Project are presented in Figure 9, Near-Term WithProject Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

11.0 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2047 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Cumulative traffic volumes for the year 2047 were determined using the Fresno Council of Governments (COG) travel model and the COG Increment Method. The base year and horizon year model traffic output used in the analyses presented in the attached Appendix C.

The traffic volumes were extrapolated to the year 2047. Future turning movements were estimated based on the methods presented in Chapter 8 of the Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 entitled “Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design.” Cumulative With-Project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 10, Cumulative (Year 2047) With-Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

12.0 INTERSECTION ANALYSES
Intersection operational analyses for intersections controlled by stop signs or traffic signals were performed using the computer program Synchro 12, which is based on the HCM procedures for calculating levels of service.

Intersection operational analyses for roundabouts were performed using the Sidra Intersection 10 software with the following options selected:
• Sidra Standard model
• Environmental factor of 1.1 for near-term and 1.05 for year 2047 • Entry/Circ Flow Adjustment set to Medium
• LOS method same as sign control
• HCM delay formula unchecked
• Gap Acceptance Capacity set to Sidra Standard (Akcelik M3D) The California Department of Transportation California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD2026) effective January 18, 2026 presents various criteria (warrants) for determining the need for traffic signals. Warrant 3, Peak Hour, is investigated for all analysis scenarios and the results.

Tables 4 through 7 present the results of the intersection analyses. The intersection analysis sheets are included in the attached Appendix D. Level of service worse than the target LOS are indicated in bold type and are underlined.

TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page5
0 Tract 6305 - Belmont Estates, 315 single-family homes on 75.7 acres north of Belmont Avenue, south of the existing Las Palmas subdivision, and east of the proposed Amador Avenue alignment.

10.0 NEAR-TERM TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The near-term traffic volumes with the Project are presented in Figure 9, Near—Term With— Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

The traffic volumes were extrapolated to the year 2047. Future turning movements were estimated based on the methods presented in Chapter 8 of the Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 entitled “Highway Traflic Data far Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design.” Cumulative With—Project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 10, Cumulative (Year 2047) With-Project Peak—Hour Traffic Volumes.

Intersection operational analyses for roundabouts were performed using the Sidra Intersection 10 software with the following options selected:

Sidra Standard model
Environmental factor of 1.1 for near-term and 1.05 for year 2047 Entry/Ciro Flow Adjustment set to Medium
LOS method same as sign control
HCM delay formula unchecked
Gap Acceptance Capacity set to Sidra Standard (Akcelik M3D) The California Department of Transportation Califamia Manual on Uniform Tmflic Control Devices (CAMUTCD2026) effective January 18, 2026 presents various criteria (warrants) for determining the need for traffic signals. Warrant 3, Peak Hour, is investigated for all analysis scenarios and the results.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 6
Table 4
Intersection LOS Summary –Existing Conditions
Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant
Met
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant
Met
Oller / Derrick Roundabout 6.9 A 6.6 A
Smoot / Sorenson All-way stop 9.5 A No 7.9 A No
Smoot / Derrick One-way stop 32.4 D No 19.6 C No
Belmont / Amador Does not exist
Belmont / Derrick Signals 18.1 B 19.2 B
Belmont / Oller One-way stop 116.9 F No 32.6 D No
Table 5
Intersection LOS Summary – Existing-Plus-Project Conditions Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant
Met
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant
Met
Oller / Derrick Roundabout 7.5 A 6.8 A
Smoot / Sorenson All-way stop 9.9 A No 8.1 A No
Smoot / Derrick One-way stop 34.1 D No 20.3 C No
Belmont / Amador One-way stop 9.6 A No 10.7 B No
Belmont / Derrick Signals 18.2 B 18.2 B
Belmont / Oller One-way stop 163.0 F No 45.2 E No
Table 6
Intersection LOS Summary – Near-Term With-Project Conditions Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant
Met
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant
Met
Oller / Derrick Roundabout 7.9 A 7.0 A
Smoot / Sorenson All-way stop 10.9 B No 9.1 A No
Smoot / Derrick One-way stop 88.0 F No 26.5 D No
Belmont / Amador One-way stop 9.8 A No 11.1 B No
Belmont / Derrick Signals 19.2 B 19.5 B
Belmont / Oller One-way stop >300 F No 104.5 F No
TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page6
Table 4
Intersection LOS Summary —ExistingConditions
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection C011tl‘01 Delay Warrant Delay Warrant
(sec) LOS Met (sec) LOS Met
Oller /Derrick Roundabout 6.9 A 6.6 A
Smoot/ Sorenson All—way stop 9.5 A No 7.9 A No
Smoot /Derrick One—waystop 32.4 D No 19.6 C No
Belmont /Amador Does not exist
Belmont /Derrick Signals 18.1 B 19.2 B
Belmont /Oller One—waystop 116.9 E No 32.6 D No
Table 5
Intersection LOS Summary — Existing-Plus-Proiect Conditions A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection C011tl‘01 Delay Warrant Delay Warrant
(sec) LOS Met (sec) LOS Met
Oller /Derrick Roundabout 7 .5 A 6.8 A
Smoot/ Sorenson All—way stop 9.9 A No 8.1 A No
Smoot /Derrick One—waystop 34.1 D No 20.3 C No
Belmont /Amador One—waystop 9.6 A No 10.7 B No
Belmont /Derrick Signals 18.2 B 18.2 B
Belmont /Oller One—waystop 163.0 E No 45.2 E No
Table 6
Intersection LOS Summary — Near-Term With-Proiect Conditions A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection C011tl‘01 Delay Warrant Delay Warrant
(sec) LOS Met (sec) LOS Met
Oller /Derrick Roundabout 7 .9 A 7 .0 A
Smoot/ Sorenson All—way stop 10.9 B No 9.1 A No
Smoot /Derrick One—waystop 88.0 E No 26.5 D No
Belmont /Amador One—waystop 9.8 A No 11.1 B No
Belmont /Derrick Signals 19.2 B 19.5 B
Belmont /Oller One—waystop >300 E No 104.5 E No
Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 7
Table 7
Intersection LOS Summary – Cumulative 2047 With-Project Conditions Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant
Met
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant
Met
Oller / Derrick Roundabout 8.3 B 8.1 A
Smoot / Sorenson All-way stop 13.0 B No 10.1 B No
Smoot / Derrick One-way stop 109.2 F No 45.8 E No
Belmont / Amador One-way stop 17.8 C No 25.5 D No
Belmont / Derrick Signals 23.3 C 25.9 C
Belmont / Oller One-way stop >300 F Yes >300 F Yes
The results of the intersection operational analyses include an estimate of the 95th -percentile
queue lengths at the study intersections. The calculated 95th -percentile queue lengths are
presented in Tables 8 and 9. Calculated queue lengths exceeding the existing storage capacity are indicated in bold type and are underlined.

TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page7
Table 7
Intersection LOS Summarv — Cumulative 2047 With-Proiect Conditions A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection C011tl‘01 Delay Warrant Delay Warrant
(sec) LOS Met (sec) LOS Met
Oller /Derrick Roundabout 8.3 B 8.1 A
Smoot/ Sorenson All—way stop 13.0 B No 10.1 B No
Smoot /Derrick One—waystop 109.2 E No 45.8 E No
Belmont /Amador One—waystop 17.8 C No 25.5 2 N0
Belmont /Derrick Signals 23.3 C 25.9 C
Belmont /Oller One—waystop >300 E Yes >300 E Yes
The results of the intersection operational analyses include an estimate of the 95th—percentile queue lengths at the study intersections. The calculated 95th-percentile queue lengths are presented in Tables 8 and 9. Calculated queue lengths exceeding the existing storage capacity are indicated in bold type and are underlined.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 8
Table 8
Intersection Queuing Summary – A.M. Peak Hour
Intersection Existing
Storage
Capacity
(feet)
95th
-Percentile Queue Length (feet)
Approach Existing ExistingPlus-Project
Near-Term
With Project
2047 With
Project
Oller / Derrick
Northeastbound >1,000 43 49 59 71
Southwestbound 60 0 2 2 2
Northwestbound 630 117 138 153 182
Southeastbound >1,000 235 299 315 390
Smoot / Sorenson
Eastbound LTR 600 3 5 23 25
Westbound LTR 590 33 35 48 70
Northbound LTR 615 8 8 8 10
Southbound LTR >1,000 38 43 48 75
Smoot / Derrick
Eastbound L 590 20 23 133 138
Eastbound R 100 28 33 40 43
Northbound L 415 18 18 20 23
Northbound T 415 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Southbound T >1,000 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Belmont / Amador
Eastbound LT >1,000 0 0 3
Westbound TR >1,000 DNS DNS DNS
Southbound LR >1,000 10 15 53
Belmont / Derrick
Eastbound L 100 27 23 25 102
Eastbound T(2)R >1,000 46 73 98 140
Westbound L 100+ 18 18 20 48
Westbound T(2)R 320++ 27 35 41 169
Northbound L 565 8 26 34 133
Northbound T >1,000 34 27 32 188
Northbound R 125 0 0 0 0
Southbound L 335 149 154 192 344
Southbound T >1,000 35 34 41 118
Southbound R >1,000 0 0 0 39
Belmont / Oller
Eastbound L 140 150 175 263 280
Eastbound T >1,000 0 0 0 0
Eastbound R 500 13 20 40 38
Westbound Private 3 3 3 3
Northbound LTR >1,000 18 20 25 25
Southbound LTR 860 0 0 0 0
+ Additional storage capacity exists in a two-way left-turn lane beyond the striped turn lane. ++ One through lane exists beyond 320 feet and provides storage capacity exceeding 1,000 feet.

TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page8
Table 8
Intersection Queuing Summary — A.M. Peak Hour
|—!l' Existing 95th-Percentile Queue Length (feet)
Storage . . Existing- Near—Term 2047 With
Approach Cazgfiyy EX1st1ng Plus-Project With Project Project 'iler / Derrick -—_l_ — _ —'_ _—!—‘-
Northeastbound >1,000 43 49 59 71
Southwestbound 60 0 2 2 2
Northwestbound 630 117 138 153 182
Southeastbound >1,000 235 299 315 390
Smoot / Sorenson 3:: T! I! I‘LI l
Eastbound LTR 600 3 5 23 25
Westbound LTR 590 33 35 48 70
Northbound LTR 615 8 8 8 10
Southbound LTR >1,000 3 8 43 48 75
Eastbound L 590 20 23 133 138
Eastbound R 100 28 33 4O 43
Northbound L 415 18 18 20 23
Northbound T 415 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Southbound T >1,000 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Eastbound LT >1,000 O O 3
Westbound TR >1,000 DNS DNS DNS
Southbound LR >1,000 10 15 53
Belmont / Derrick I}.

Eastbound L 100 27 23 25 m
Eastbound T(2)R >1,000 46 73 98 140
Westbound L 100+ 18 18 20 48
Westbound T(2)R 320++ 27 35 41 169
Northbound L 565 8 26 34 133
Northbound T >1,000 34 27 32 188
Northbound R 125 0 O O O
Southbound L 335 149 154 192 344
Southbound T >1,000 35 34 41 118
Southbound R >1,000 O O O 39
Ramona : : III:-
Eastbound L 140 E 1i E M
Eastbound T >1,000 0 O O 0
Eastbound R 500 13 20 4O 38
Westbound Private 3 3 3 3
Northbound LTR >1,000 18 20 25 25
Southbound LTR 860 0 O O O
+ Additional storage capacity exists in a two—way left-tum lane beyond the striped turn lane. ++ One through lane exists beyond 320 feet and provides storage capacity exceeding 1,000 feet.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 9
Table 9
Intersection Queuing Summary – P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection Existing
Storage
Capacity
(feet)
95th
-Percentile Queue Length (feet)
Approach Existing ExistingPlus-Project
Near-Term
With Project
2047 With
Project
Oller / Derrick
Northeastbound >1,000 47 49 54 851
Southwestbound 60 1 1 1 2
Northwestbound 630 91 103 110 191
Southeastbound >1,000 126 150 167 269
Smoot / Sorenson
Eastbound LTR 600 0 3 8 10
Westbound LTR 590 18 20 38 55
Northbound LTR 615 3 3 3 8
Southbound LTR >1,000 13 15 18 23
Smoot / Derrick
Eastbound L 590 3 3 25 45
Eastbound R 100 10 10 13 18
Northbound L 415 10 10 15 20
Northbound T 415 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Southbound T >1,000 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Belmont / Amador
Eastbound LT >1,000 3 3 5
Westbound TR >1,000 DNS DNS DNS
Southbound LR >1,000 13 15 60
Belmont / Derrick
Eastbound L 100 77 52 59 213
Eastbound T(2)R >1,000 46 68 85 160
Westbound L 100+ 32 30 34 93
Westbound T(2)R 320++ 50 72 108 173
Northbound L 565 20 58 78 122
Northbound T >1,000 134 107 128 236
Northbound R 125 0 0 0 9
Southbound L 335 131 117 148 242
Southbound T >1,000 50 41 48 206
Southbound R >1,000 0 0 0 22
Belmont / Oller
Eastbound L 140 40 53 108 330
Eastbound T >1,000 0 0 0 0
Eastbound R 500 20 25 35 58
Westbound Private 3 3 3 5
Northbound LTR >1,000 8 13 20 25
Southbound LTR 860 0 0 0 0
+ Additional storage capacity exists in a two-way left-turn lane beyond the striped turn lane. ++ One through lane exists beyond 320 feet and provides storage capacity exceeding 1,000 feet.

TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California
Table 9
Intersection Queuing Summary — P.M. Peak Hour
|—'I Existing 95th-Percentile Queue Length (feet)
Storage . . Existing- Near—Term 2047 With
Approach Cazgfiyy EX1st1ng Plus-Project With Project Project 'iler / Derrick -'_l_ — _ —' i -
Northeastbound >1,000 47 49 54 851
Southwestbound 60 1 1 1 2
Northwestbound 630 91 103 1 10 191
Southeastbound >1,000 126 150 167 269
Eastbound LTR 600 O 3 8 10
Westbound LTR 590 18 20 3 8 55
Northbound LTR 615 3 3 3 8
Southbound LTR >1,000 13 15 18 23
Eastbound L 590 3 3 25 45
Eastbound R 100 10 10 13 18
Northbound L 415 10 10 15 20
Northbound T 415 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Southbound T >1,000 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Eastbound LT >1,000 3 3 5
Westbound TR >1,000 DNS DNS DNS
Southbound LR >1,000 13 15 60
Belmont / Derrick , I.

Eastbound L 100 77 52 59 m
Eastbound T(2)R >1,000 46 68 85 160
Westbound L 100+ 32 3O 34 93
Westbound T(2)R 320++ 50 72 108 173
Northbound L 565 20 58 78 122
Northbound T >1,000 134 107 128 236
Northbound R 125 0 O O 9
Southbound L 335 131 117 148 242
Southbound T >1,000 50 41 48 206
Southbound R >1,000 O O O 22
Ramona
Eastbound L
:
140
: —:—
40 5 3 108 M
Eastbound T >1,000 O O O 0
Eastbound R 500 20 25 35 58
Westbound Private 3 3 3 5
Northbound LTR >1,000 8 13 20 25
Southbound LTR 860 O O O O
+ Additional storage capacity exists in a two—way left-tum lane beyond the striped turn lane. ++ One through lane exists beyond 320 feet and provides storage capacity exceeding 1,000 feet.

June8, 2026
Page9
Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 10

13.0 DISCUSSION OF INTERSECTION ANALYSES

13.1 Existing Conditions
The intersection analyses indicate that the study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour with a calculated 95th
-percentile queue exceeding the storage capacity by
10 feet. Peak-hour traffic signal warrants are not satisfied.

13.2 Existing-Plus-Project Conditions
The existing-plus-Project conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project in the absence of other pending projects and regional growth.

This scenario isolates the specific effects of the Project.

The existing-plus-Project conditions analyses indicate that the all of the study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the existing condition, and the Project is likely to exacerbate the delays. The Project is also expected to cause the LOS to drop from D to E during the p.m. peak hour. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied.

Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

13.3 Near-Term With-Project Conditions
The near-term with-Project-conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project and cumulative projects. This scenario identifies a cumulative near-term condition for known projects.

The near-term conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target LOS:
• Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
• Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing.

The intersection of Smoot Avenue and Derrick Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the nearterm condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a low peak-hour factor. No improvements are TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page10

13.0 DISCUSSION OF INTERSECTION ANALYSES

13.1 Existing Conditions
The intersection analyses indicate that the study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-to-northbound left—turn)operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour with a calculated 95th-percentile queue exceeding the storage capacity by 10 feet. Peak-hour traffic signal warrants are not satisfied.

13.2 Existing-Plus-Proiect Conditions
The existing-plus-Project conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project in the absence of other pending projects and regional growth.

This scenario isolates the specific effects of the Project.

The existing-plus-Project conditions analyses indicate that the all of the study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with 110excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound—to—northbound left—turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the existing condition, and the Project is likely to exacerbate the delays. The Project is also expected to cause the LOS to drop from D to E during the p.m. peak hour. A review of the peak—hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied.

Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left—turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

13.3 Near-Term With-Proiect Conditions
The near-term With-Project-conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project and cumulative projects. This scenario identifies a cumulative near-term condition for known projects.

The near-term conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target L08:
0 Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
0 Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing.

The intersection of Smoot Avenue and Derrick Street (specifically the eastbound—t0— northbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the near— term condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a 10W peak-hour factor. No improvements are Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 11
recommended, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours in the near-term condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

13.4 Year 2047 With-Project Conditions
The year 2047 With-Project conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target LOS:
• Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
• Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue
• Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions, with the following exception:
• Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33): calculated 95th -percentile queues in
the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach exceed the storage capacity.

Smoot and Derrick Avenues
The intersection of Smoot Avenue and Derrick Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour and LOS E during the p.m. peak hour in the year 2047. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied.

The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a low peak-hour factor.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. Analysis sheets for improved conditions (both traffic signals and a roundabout) are presented in Appendix E and indicate that the intersection would operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of a future traffic signal at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process (ISOAP) should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page11
recommended, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound—t0— northbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours in the near—term condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

13.4 Year 2047 With-Proiect Conditions
The year 2047 With-Project conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target LOS:
0 Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
0 Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue
0 Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions, with the following exception:
0 Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33): calculated 95th-percentile queues in the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach exceed the storage capacity.

Smoot and Derrick Avenues
The intersection of Smoot Avenue and Derrick Street (specifically the eastbound—t0— northbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour and LOS E during the p.m. peak hour in the year 2047. A review of the peak—hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied.

The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a 10w peak—hourfactor.

The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process (ISOAP) should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 12
that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

Belmont and Derrick Avenues
At the intersection of Belmont and Derrick Avenues, the length of the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach should be extended to at least 225 feet by the year 2047.

Belmont and Amador Avenues
The intersection of Belmont and Amador Avenues (specifically the southbound-to-eastbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. A review of the peakhour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied.

The intersection is expected to operate at acceptable LOS in the future with widening to include a dedicated left-turn lane and a dedicated right-turn lane on the southbound approach, plus a dedicated right-turn lane on the westbound approach.

Belmont Avenue and Oller Street
The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours in the year 2047 condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour traffic signal warrants will be satisfied.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. Analysis sheets for improved conditions (both traffic signals and a roundabout) are presented in Appendix E and indicate that the intersection would operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of future traffic signals or a roundabout at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans ISOAP should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

14.0 EQUITABLE SHARE CALCULATIONS
Where required improvements for future conditions are not included in a traffic impact fee, the Project’s financial responsibility for the improvements can be determined based on equitable share calculations as presented in the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies dated December 2002. The 2002 Guide presents the following equation to determine a project’s equitable share of the cost of improvements:

TT EB
T
P
−
=
TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page12
that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

Belmont and Derrick Avenues
At the intersection of Belmont and Derrick Avenues, the length of the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach should be extended to at least 225 feet by the year 2047.

Belmont and Amador Avenues
The intersection of Belmont and Amador Avenues (specifically the southbound—to—eastbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. A review of the peak— hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak—hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied.

Belmont Avenue and Oller Street
The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound—t0— northbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours in the year 2047 condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour traffic signal warrants will be satisfied.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. Analysis sheets for improved conditions (both traffic signals and a roundabout) are presented in Appendix E and indicate that the intersection would operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of future traffic signals or a roundabout at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans ISOAP should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

14.0 EQUITABLE SHARE CALCULATIONS
Where required improvements for future conditions are not included in a traffic impact fee, the Project’s financial responsibility for the improvements can be determined based on equitable share calculations as presented in the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Trajfic Impact Studies dated December 2002. The 2002 Guide presents the following equation to determine a project’s equitable share of the cost of improvements: _ T TB—TE
Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 13
where:

P = The equitable share of the project’s traffic impact; T = The project trips generated during the peak hour of the adjacent facility; TB = The forecasted (future with project) traffic volume on the impacted facility; TE = The existing traffic on the facility plus approved projects traffic (cumulative).

Table 10 presents equitable share responsibility calculations for the 2047 improvements based on p.m. peak hour trips. These fair shares would not be applicable if the improvement is included in, or added to, a transportation impact fee paid by the Project.

Table 10
Equitable Share Responsibility Calculations – P.M. Peak Hour Location Project
Trips
Existing
Traffic
2047
Traffic
Equitable
Share
Smoot / Derrick 31 817 1,210 7.9%
Belmont / Amador 126 151 998 14.9%
Belmont / Derrick 139 895 1,977 12.8%
Belmont / Oller 89 978 1,545 15.7%

15.0 CEQA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSES
Senate Bill (SB) 743, signed in 2013 and codified in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines in January 2019, changes the way transportation impacts are analyzed in the CEQA process. Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) replaces automobile delay and level of service (LOS) as the metric for determination of a transportation impact. The Fresno Council of Governments (COG) prepared a document entitled Fresno County SB 743 Implementation Regional Guidelines dated June 2025 (hereinafter referred to as the COG Guidelines) to assist local agencies with VMT analyses. For residential projects, the COG Guidelines provides substantial evidence for the following statement: “Therefore, Fresno County member jurisdictions may establish a threshold for land use developments, specifically residential and office, of exceeding 13 percent below the existing regional VMT per capita as indicative of a significant environmental impact.” Per the COG Guidelines, the regional average is 17.63 VMT per capita and the significance threshold of 13 percent below

17.63 VMT per capita is 15.34 VMT per capita. Therefore, any project that generates more than 15.34 VMT per capita creates a significant transportation impact.

The COG travel model is the primary tool in Fresno County available to estimate VMT.

COG created an online VMT screening tool based on model output that identifies VMT per capita for specific locations. As of the date of this report, the screening tool is available at:
https://www.fresnocog.org/project/vmt-tool/. A print generated using the screening tool for traffic analysis zone (TAZ) 1701 immediately east of Amador Avenue (there is not applicable TAZ west of Amador Avenue) is included in Appendix F and indicates a project with 271 homes east of Amador Avenue would generate 10.3 VMT per capita. The Project site is actually located an average of half a mile west of TAZ 1701, so it is suggested that the actual Project VMT per capita is likely 10.8. This value is below the significance threshold of 15.34 VMT per capita. Therefore, it is suggested that the lead agency may presume that the Project will create a less-than-significant transportation impact.

TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page13
Where:

P = The equitable share of the project’s traffic impact; T = The project trips generated during the peak hour of the adjacent facility; T3 = The forecasted (future with project) traffic volume on the impacted facility; TE= The existing traffic on the facility plus approved projects traffic (cumulative).

Table 10
Eq uitable Share Responsibilitv Calculations — P.M. Peak Hour Location Project Existing 2047 Equitable
Trips Traffic Traffic Share
Smoot /Derrick 31 817 1,210 7.9%
Belmont / Amador 126 151 998 14.9%
Belmont /Derrick 139 895 1,977 12.8%
Belmont /Oller 89 978 1,545 15.7%

15.0 CEQA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSES
Senate Bill (SB) 743, signed in 2013 and codified in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines in January 2019, changes the way transportation impacts are analyzed in the CEQA process. Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) replaces automobile delay and level of service (LOS) as the metric for determination of a transportation impact. The Fresno Council of Governments (COG) prepared a document entitled Fresno County SB 743 Implementation Regional Guidelines dated June 2025 (hereinafter referred to as the COG Guidelines) to assist local agencies with VMT analyses. For residential projects, the COG Guidelines provides substantial evidence for the following statement: “Therefore, Fresno County member jurisdictions may establish a threshold for [and use developments, specifically residential and office, of exceeding 13 percent below the existing regional VMT per capita as indicative of a Significant environmental impact.” Per the COG Guidelines, the regional average is 17.63 VMT per capita and the significance threshold of 13 percent below

17.63 VMT per capita is 15.34 VMT per capita. Therefore, any project that generates more than 15.34 VMT per capita creates a significant transportation impact.

The COG travel model is the primary tool in Fresno County available to estimate VMT.

COG created an online VMT screening tool based on model output that identifies VMT per capita for specific locations. As of the date of this report, the screening tool is available at:
https://WWW.fresnocogorg/proiect/vmt—t001/. A print generated using the screening tool for traffic analysis zone (TAZ) 1701 immediately east of Amador Avenue (there is not applicable TAZ west of Amador Avenue) is included in Appendix F and indicates a project with 271 homes east of Amador Avenue would generate 10.3 VMT per capita. The Project site is actually located an average of half a mile west of TAZ 1701, so it is suggested that the actual Project VMT per capita is likely 10.8. This value is below the significance threshold of 15.34 VMT per capita. Therefore, it is suggested that the lead agency may presume that the Project will create a less-than-significant transportation impact.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 14

16.0 CONCLUSIONS
Generally-accepted traffic engineering principles and methods were employed to estimate the number of trips expected to be generated by the Project, to analyze the existing traffic conditions, and to analyze the traffic conditions projected to occur in the future.

The Project VMT per capita is estimated to be 10.8, which is below the significance threshold of 15.34 VMT per capita. Therefore, it is suggested that the lead agency may presume that the Project will create a less-than-significant transportation impact based on VMT.

The results of the operational analyses are summarized below for each analysis scenario.

16.1 Existing Conditions
The study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastboundto-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour with a calculated 95th -
percentile queue exceeding the storage capacity by 10 feet. Peak-hour traffic signal warrants are not satisfied.

16.2 Existing-Plus-Project Conditions
The existing-plus-Project conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project in the absence of other pending projects and regional growth.

This scenario isolates the specific effects of the Project.

The study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastboundto-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the existing condition, and the Project is likely to exacerbate the delays. The Project is also expected to cause the LOS to drop from D to E during the p.m. peak hour. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended to be constructed by the Project, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

16.3 Near-Term With-Project Conditions
The near-term with-Project-conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project and cumulative projects. This scenario identifies a cumulative near-term condition for known projects.

The near-term conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target LOS:
• Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
• Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page14

The results of the operational analyses are summarized below for each analysis scenario.

16.1 Existing Conditions
The study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound— to-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour with a calculated 95th— percentile queue exceeding the storage capacity by 10 feet. Peak-hour traffic signal warrants are not satisfied.

16.2 Existing-Plus-Proiect Conditions
The existing-plus-Project conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project in the absence of other pending projects and regional growth.

This scenario isolates the specific effects of the Project.

The study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound— to-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the existing condition, and the Project is likely to exacerbate the delays. The Project is also expected to cause the LOS to drop from D to E during the p.m. peak hour. A review of the peak—hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all—way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended to be constructed by the Project, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as filture developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

16.3 Near-Term With-Proiect Conditions
The near-term With-Project-conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project and cumulative projects. This scenario identifies a cumulative near-term condition for known projects.

The near-term conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target L08:
0 Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
0 Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 15
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing.

The intersection of Smoot Avenue and Derrick Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the nearterm condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a low peak-hour factor. No improvements are recommended to be constructed by the Project, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours in the near-term condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended to be constructed by the Project, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

16.4 Year 2047 With-Project Conditions
The year 2047 With-Project conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target LOS:
• Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
• Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue
• Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions, with the following exception:
• Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33): calculated 95th -percentile queues in
the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach exceed the storage capacity.

The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a low peak-hour factor.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of a future traffic signal at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page15
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing.

The intersection of Smoot Avenue and Derrick Street (specifically the eastbound—t0— northbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the near— term condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a 10W peak—hour factor. No improvements are recommended to be constructed by the Project, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound—t0— northbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours in the near—term condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended to be constructed by the Project, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

16.4 Year 2047 With-Proiect Conditions
The year 2047 With-Project conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target L08:
0 Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
0 Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue
0 Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions, with the following exception:
0 Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33): calculated 95th-percentile queues in the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach exceed the storage capacity.

The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a 10w peak—hourfactor.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 16
The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process (ISOAP) should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

Belmont and Derrick Avenues
At the intersection of Belmont and Derrick Avenues, the length of the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach should be extended to at least 225 feet by the year 2047.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of future traffic signals or a roundabout at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans ISOAP should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page16
The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the fiJture, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process (ISOAP) should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

Belmont and Derrick Avenues
At the intersection of Belmont and Derrick Avenues, the length of the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach should be extended to at least 225 feet by the year 2047.

The intersection is expected to operate at acceptable LOS in the future with Widening to include a dedicated left-turn lane and a dedicated right-turn lane on the southbound approach, plus a dedicated right-turn lane on the westbound approach.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of future traffic signals or a roundabout at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans ISOAP should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 17
Thank you for the opportunity to perform these traffic analyses. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions.

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
John Rowland, PE, TE
Attachments: Figures 1 through 10
Appendix A - Scoping Letter and Agency Responses
Appendix B - Traffic Count Data Sheets
Appendix C - Fresno County Travel Model
Appendix D - Intersection Analysis Sheets
Appendix E - Improved Intersection Analysis Sheets
Appendix F – Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis
TrafficStudy — ProposedResidentialDevelopment June8, 2026 Mendota,California Page17
Thank you for the opportunity to perform these traffic analyses. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions.

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
John
W
Rowland, PE, TE
Attachments: Figures 1 through 10
Appendix A - Scoping Letter and Agency Responses
Appendix B - Traffic Count Data Sheets
Appendix C - Fresno County Travel Model
Appendix D - Intersection Analysis Sheets
Appendix E - Improved Intersection Analysis Sheets
Appendix F — Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

FIGURES
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT

FIGURES

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
{PROJECTLOCATION
GONZALEZST. _
Li -"8 .22 IIIIIilII'
EEEEEEEEEEEEE 8< 0 0 - 0 |—' :15 l— g (n LLI LU ‘0 — o > > |—' Q! 3 of VE CIR
‘0 — l- S D 2 > o
0 <9
LLI (I) CANTUST. lllIIIIIlI
!‘ "I“
mi: ._
EEEEEEEE .2 CI PA I... FOURTH ST. TEST.

MENDOTA HIGH S( HOOL
LEGEND

VA PROJECTAREA
ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California

SITEVICINITYMAP
Not to Scale — @ PETERS ENGINEERING GRCILIP Figure1 —
. l 3. 78 Acres I.
(Basin) ' x.._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ' _»- __ 12f8.’ _____ __ . ,n | ’ 2+8§ 4. 249 g 254 255 260 261 I
3' 24? rows . Gg 'H 256 259 262 ' L _
246 250 '9 4A a Igi 103.2% was: 1033’: G
1&5? _ 142.2% 245 l 41 7 m ( am: 251 3,3, 252 \ 529':/ 25? B 253 \52.n ( 233 g :5 . 244 .2: _ __ _ — _ J n:-l
:H 243 g P— ‘
It) -"~'~—.. <5: I ““9242 236 235 234 2.33 232 231 230 229 223 227 226 225 224 223 222 T - ' -ll 24.1 I 92.3% 50.03: m: 52.33: 55.2% : E i I § 135.4: “ was! -u i . . 2+0 201 202 203 294 205 205 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 2183 1 1 § - i . - 239 in l [J— «u 2 g J— 41 — — — — — —— — . _
'6 g 235 g a E l 11
i”: 4. 237 33 l | 209 199 193 197 196 195 194 193 192 191 190 189 188 137 135 185 184 183 I 4 ‘ ‘ g I $5.71 623’: 50.0% some an.“ 52.3% 55.2% - l _ .g § 93%4% q. 5 l I E 165 156 1a? 168 169 rm 171 ‘72 12:3 m 175 we 17? 173 179 130 181 18$ 6 . _l_ _ 4, l
- _— _ _‘h—_ « _ — _ —_ _ v I l4—‘-
I a :H I ,3 . 'l are
7—. l 5 E . _
a 151 150 149 145 14-, 145 145 144 143 142 141 140 159 138 137 136 135 134 i l ‘1". 9 a L _/ —_ § 53.32:62.3% 59.02 £03 56.0% 32.3% 551': ' 150 m“ 3 '3 I CE: 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 123 127 123 129 130 131 132 133‘ 3 7

15.9 [Mi a -— l 10 a ; . ' -u 158 -—§— — —— — — — — — ———l .. l ‘l | '— 11 § ‘ 15? fl l,
115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 105 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 93 12 g l l 158 Es“: 32.3% same 50.0% 50.03.-132.53 55.2% 13 l £35.43: ‘ 3” 155 "3 I 32 83 e4 35 as 37 as as 91 92 93 94 ’3__.,. so 31 so 95 96 973 “ | I 14 :H , m " . 154 1! Lu I
'153-§ ° —————_———— ‘5 lg ._ 3 la
was“:“’ 15 {E l I : 152 a; V — > — — __ ‘ ‘ _ _ 4| % I ' as 79 78 77 7s 35 74 7:5 12 71 in 39 as 67 66 65 17 g E I i": 3' 523': 59.0% may: 50.0%323': 55.2% ‘ ‘4: _‘ 43 :1 —— -u -— § ’3‘“ § 5m
' 42 4,4 45 46 4? 45 +9 an 51 52 53 54 55 53 5-; 53 59 so 61 _‘ ‘3 i a g l ‘
‘ 1* 825':50.3% 50.3“:525'; 55.5% no! saw :7 I
35 34 33 32 31 3:3 29 27 26 25 24 23
P.“ ?1.'_4:l: ‘ . . ' _ 1m ’1:
1310.63:

ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California

SITEPLAN
NottoScale @ PETERS ENGINEERING GRCILIF’ FigureZ
§W \\

MENDDTA ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL \\
a
’3; 9
€0
e1"5. \
\ 0 A r: 0 BA53 AveNui f .0}.
’0 E 9)
\X RM‘REZAVENu m X our: 51' or A; 6‘ »
(PROJECTLOCATION
FOUR ST. KATE ST. I‘ll IIIII
LEGEND

VA PROJECTAREA
ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California

PROJECTTRIPDISTRIBUTIONPERCENTAGES
Not to Scale — FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP Figure3
\\ \\

MENDDTA
(((
[14(10)
A
(O
‘—
VLO DERRICKIOLLER SORENSEN/SMOOT 914(10)
AA
(DD
(‘0‘—
VV
‘— 35(24) N mm
OLLER(SR-180)/BELMONT ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California FOURTH ST. _. 5: ST. TE
g E; g K23(70) gg k3(8)
1(1) J 1 3(8) J 55(38) % ii 5(4) N :5; 7(5) N 33’%
DERRICK(SR-33)/SMOOT AMADOR /BELMONT DERRICK(SR-33)/BELMONT . | . LEGEND
3 STUDYAREAINTERSECTIONS
xx (YY) AM(PM)PEAKHOUR VOLUMES

VA PROJECTSITE

PROJECTPEAK-HOUR TRAFFICVOLUMES
— FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP
Not to Scale Figure4
\\ \\ 6E3
gfia E§§ ”1’1
7(1)]
138(232)%ll
LO (‘0 11(23)N 33
LO ('0EB

DERRICK/OLLER
e
6(260) [ fim
WT
F §§§
2 i
k
MFN
o 01
A00;: \l—\Oo v
Vv 0003 LO\— FN OLLER(SR-180)/BELMONT
c
FOURT

MENDDTA
n fig
$3.73 K124(143) §§
935(14) 939(50) 2 i &[24(9) 2 i
6(2) J 28(9) J
10(5)6 iii :3 42(101)6
4mm %&% 111(73)N g:
8“ a: 3 $
SORENSEN/ SMOOT DERRICK(SR-33)/ SMOOT AMADORI.BELMONT
k143(126)
951(78)
[10(19)

CDVLD VLDQO
(‘0 FV
21(52) 9 52(65) i E [243(150)
19 105AA cow cow—x VV NA
V
8( 13
DERRICK(SR-33)/BELMONT ® STUDYAREAINTERSECTIONS
xx (YY) AM(PM)PEAKHOUR VOLUMES

VA PROJECTSITE
ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California

EXISTINGPEAK-HOUR TRAFFICVOLUMES
— FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP
Not to Scale Figure5
c TH ST. _. 5: ST. TE FOUR
w V W W F
DERRICK/OLLER SORENSEIN/SMOOT DERRICK(SB-33)/SMOOT AMADOR/BELMONT DERRICK(SR-33)/BELMONT LEGEND
$ % Q STUDYAREAINTERSECT

PROJECTSITE

J SIGNALIZEDINTERSECTION

S) V STOPSIGN
OLLER(SR-1_80)/BELMONT ‘1 DIRECTIONOFTRAVEL
ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California

EXISTINGLANECONFIGURATIONSANDINTERSECTIONCONTROL
Not to Scale — FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP Figure6
\\ \\ 8E?
gfia E§§
”1’1
7(1)] 138(232)%11
LO (‘0 11(23)N 33
LO ('0EB

DERRICK/OLLER
e
6(260) [ fim
WT
F §§§
2 i
k
MFN
o 01
A00;: \l—\Oo v
Vv 0003 LO\— FN OLLER(SR-180)/BELMONT
c
FOURT ST. TE mo ydé
“$513w3;
A i: G‘ c§§ fig 3 g Efig N363 k124(143) N8 :, z K2057) E’K’g k136(109) ‘— of) \— O’) 0') co (\l \— CO (\I 2 i & 935(14) 2 i 2 K 931(29) J $ E 958(95) [24(9) r10(19) 6(2) J 28(9) J 5(27) J 14(44) J
10(5)% iii R T 37(74) a 115(113) 6 iii 4mm %&% 111(73)N 9r: 22mm 33:8:
<9)‘— co 7: 5—"Era/$2 E 8 F
SORENSEN/ SMOOT DERRICK(SR-33)/ SMOOT AMADORI.BELMONT DERRICK(SR-33)/ BELMONT ® STUDYAREAINTERSECTIONS xx (YY) AM(PM)PEAKHOUR VOLUMES

VA PROJECTSITE
ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California
— FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP

REDISTRIBUTEDEXISTINGPEAK-HOUR TRAFFICVOLUMES
Not to Scale Figure7
\\ \\ §§A (‘0 V N E§§3
”1’1
7(1)]
138(232)ell
11(23)N gg
53 3.2’ C") DERRICK/OLLER
10(270)
[5(3) 3 T
F §§§
:33 i
k 147)]
2(2)
N 00\l 100(161)N
8 E ‘— N OLLER(SR-180)/BELMONT

MENDDTA
g% K129(159)
“ 938(22)
E [24(9) J%

SORENSEN/SMOOT
ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California FOURTH ST. _. 5: T.

DERRICK(SR-33)/SMOOT TES
63‘
g :Tégi EE
kéiééé?
9 “23:“? e7 57
2 K J i E [10(19)
8(35)J 14(44)J R T f
37(74)e 170(151)e AAA
29(36)N gggg
{2352 AMADORllBELMONT DERRICK(SR-33)/BELMONT
LEGEND
3 STUDYAREAINTERSECTIONS
xx (YY) AM(PM)PEAKHOUR VOLUMES

VA PROJECTSITE
EXISTING-PLUS—PROJECTPEAK-HOUR TRAFFICVOLUMES
— FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP
Not to Scale Figure8
\\ \\
’é’gL (O <- N 2%?
”IE
7(1)]
163(254)e :1
11(23)N gg
“8§(‘0 DERRICK/OLLER
e
0(270)
[— 5(3)
_\_\_\ AAA _\_\A Vvv
104 )0 (1)% 161(201) N
k
2(2)
N
Vv
(CV CON
FN FOURTH ST. _. 3 ST. TE

MENDDTA
8§g $5 g g ggé ggg K129(159) §§ g g: K51(153) EfiE
igeKfifiw 2i 2 kewm J$g
8(3)] R T f 94(52)J R T 10(43)J 14(44)J
103(67)% AAA AA same 217(182)%
4(1) 3:21 138(92)N gg 39(43)N 30 15
K150(153) 994(210)
K10(19)
1MV 65
V
13 SORENSEN/SMOOT DERRICK(SR-33)/SMOOT AMADORllBELMONT DERRICK(SR-33)/BELMONT LEGEND 3 STUDYAREAINTERSECTIONS

XX(YY) AM(PM)PEAKHOUR VOLUMES

VA PROJECTSITE
OLLER(SR-180)/BELMONT ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California
— FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP

NEAR-TERMWITH-PROJECTPEAK-HOUR TRAFFICVOLUMES
Not to Scale Figure9
\\ \\

MENDDTA
6367A c’v'a‘ E33 355 533g 5.58 K159(214)
‘— “ 976(118)
i E i E [30(11)
9(1)] 9(3)]
197(311)%:1 105(68)% ii?
14(29) 3 g 5(2) $533
NV l\ N O) COF CO

V DERRICKIOLLER SORENSEN/SMOOT
orx AA A
e 315(
[— 5(3) Hf A
AVvv
125(126) J
1 a
177(235) N
AA
v 242)J 448)a 2(2)
N
Vv COCO
NN
NN OLLER(SR-180)/BELMONT ProposedResidentialDevelopment Mendota,California
c
FOURT ST. TE
DERRICK(SR-33)/SMOOT
f: a : £21, : $ g g K92(186) Egg
k192(201)
9377(202) 9236(243) 2 & J $ &[2359)
20(58)J 66(180)J x T f
176(410)e 233(292)% AA
48(77)N §§§
C) CD ‘—
‘Lf_> N AMADORI.BELMONT DERRICK(SR-33)/ BELMONT ® STUDYAREAINTERSECTIONS xx (YY) AM(PM)PEAKHOUR VOLUMES

VA PROJECTSITE
CUMULATIVE(YEAR2047)WITH-PROJECTPEAK-HOUR TRAFFICVOLUMES — FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP
Not to Scale Figure10
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX A

SCOPING LETTER AND AGENCY RESPONSES
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX A

SCOPING LETTER AND AGENCY RESPONSES

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Scoping Letter
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT
Scoping Letter

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
862 Pollasky Avenue ♦ Clovis, California 93612 ♦ (559) 299-1544 ♦ www.peters-engineering.com Mr. Michael Osborn October 8, 2025
City of Mendota City Engineer
c/o Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, Inc.
455 West Fir Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
Subject: Scope of Traffic Study
Proposed Residential Development
West of Amador Avenue
Mendota, California
Dear Mr. Osborn:

Peters Engineering Group has been retained to perform a traffic study for the subject project.

The purpose of this letter is to present information for the City of Mendota and other affected agencies to consider in finalizing the required scope of the traffic study, including approval of the trip generation calculations and determination of the intersections to be studied. The City may provide this letter to other affected agencies for review and comment, in particular the County of Fresno and Caltrans.

Project Description
The proposed single-family residential subdivision covers approximately 49.99 acres located west of the existing segment of Amador Avenue, extending roughly from north of Gonzalez Street to south of Silva Street. The Project proposes 271 single-family homes. Access to the site will be via three local streets connecting to Amador Avenue.

The Project site location is presented in the attached Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map, and the Project site plan is presented in the attached Figure 2, Site Plan.

Project Trip Generation
Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12 th Edition, are typically used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by proposed projects. Table 1 presents the trip generation estimates for the Project.

Table 1
Project Weekday Trip Generation
Land Use Size Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Rate Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Single-Family
Detached
Housing (210)
271 9.09 2,464 0.70 27:73 51 139 190 0.93 62:38 156 96 252 Reference: Trip Generation Manual, 12
th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, August 2025

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Mr. Michael Osborn October 8, 2025
City of Mendota City Engineer
c/o Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, Inc.
455 West Fir Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
Subject: Scope of Traffic Study
Proposed Residential Development
West of Amador Avenue
Mendota, California
Dear Mr. Osborn:

Peters Engineering Group has been retained to perform a traffic study for the subject project.

Proiect Description
The proposed single-family residential subdivision covers approximately 49.99 acres located west of the existing segment of Amador Avenue, extending roughly from north of Gonzalez Street to south of Silva Street. The Project proposes 271 single—family homes. Access to the site will be Via three local streets connecting to Amador Avenue.

The Project site location is presented in the attached Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map, and the Project site plan is presented in the attached Figure 2, Site Plan.

Proiect Trip Generation
Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12”“ Edition, are typically used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by proposed projects. Table 1 presents the trip generation estimates for the Project.

Table 1
Proiect Weekdav Trip Generation
Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Land Use 5116 Rate Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Single-Family
Detached 271 9.09 2,464 0.70 27:73 51 139 190 0.93 62:38 156 96 252 Housing (210)
Reference: Trip Generation Manual, 12"” Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, August 2025 862 Pollasky Avenue 0 Clovis, California 93612 O (559) 299—1544 9 WWW.peters—engineering.com Scope of Traffic Study - Proposed Residential Development October 8, 2025 Mendota, California Page 2
Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
The distribution of project trips presented was estimated based on results of previous traffic studies, available routes, the locations of complementary land uses, and engineering judgment.

The percentage distribution of Project traffic is presented in the attached Figure 3, Project Trip Distribution Percentages. The project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4, Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes.

Study Area
Peters Engineering Group is requesting that the City of Mendota, Caltrans, and the County of Fresno indicate which, if any, intersections and road segments should be included in the study.

Based on a previous study for a similar near the Project site and the Project trip assignment, it is anticipated that the following intersections may require analysis:

1. Smoot Avenue and Sorenson Avenue

2. Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

3. Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue Extension

4. Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

5. Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
Study Scenarios
The following time periods will be studied:
• Weekday a.m. peak hour between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m.;
• Weekday p.m. peak hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.

It is anticipated that analyses will be required for at least the following scenarios:
• Existing Conditions;
• Existing-Plus-Project Conditions;
• Near-Term Conditions With Project (Includes Approved and Pending Projects); and • Long-Term (Year 2046) Conditions With Project.

Road segment analyses are not proposed because intersection operations typically govern unless the road segment is at least one to two miles long with no stop signs or signalized intersections.

Crash history, safety studies, and traffic signal warrants analyses are not proposed for this study.

Pending Projects
Peters Engineering Group requests that the City of Mendota provide information related to any pending and approved projects in the study area to be included in the near-term analyses.

Operational Conditions Analysis
Level of Service
The Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual, 7 th Edition, (HCM) defines
level of service (LOS) as, “A quantitative stratification of a performance measure or measures that represent quality of service, measured on an A-F scale, with LOS A representing the best Scopeof TrafficStudy- ProposedResidentialDevelopment October8, 2025 Mendota,California Page2
Proiect Trip Distribution and Assignment
The distribution of project trips presented was estimated based on results of previous traffic studies, available routes, the locations of complementary land uses, and engineering judgment.

Study Area
Peters Engineering Group is requesting that the City of Mendota, Caltrans, and the County of Fresno indicate which, if any, intersections and road segments should be included in the study.

Based on a previous study for a similar near the Project site and the Project trip assignment, it is anticipated that the following intersections may require analysis:

1. Smoot Avenue and Sorenson Avenue

2. Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

3. Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue Extension

4. Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

5. Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
Studv Scenarios
The following time periods will be studied:
0 Weekday a.m. peak hour between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m.;
0 Weekday p.m. peak hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.

It is anticipated that analyses will be required for at least the following scenarios:
0 Existing Conditions;
0 Existing-Plus-Project Conditions;
0 Near-Term Conditions With Project (Includes Approved and Pending Projects); and o Long-Term (Year 2046) Conditions With Project.

Road segment analyses are not proposed because intersection operations typically govern unless the road segment is at least one to two miles long with no stop signs or signalized intersections.

Crash history, safety studies, and traffic signal warrants analyses are not proposed for this study.

Pending Proiects
Peters Engineering Group requests that the City of Mendota provide information related to any pending and approved projects in the study area to be included in the near-term analyses.

Operational Conditions Analvsis
Level of Service
The Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual, 7” Edition, (HCM) defines level of service (LOS) as, “A quantitative stratification of a performance measure or measures that represent quality of service, measured on an A-F scale, with LOS A representing the best Scope of Traffic Study - Proposed Residential Development October 8, 2025 Mendota, California Page 3
operating conditions from the traveler’s perspective and LOS F the worst.” Automobile mode LOS characteristics for both unsignalized and signalized intersections are presented in Tables 3 and 4
Table 3
Level of Service Characteristics for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)
A 0-10
B >10-15
C >15-25
D >25-35
E >35-50
F >50
Table 4
Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of
Service Description Average Vehicle
Delay (seconds)
A
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. <10 B
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is very short. >10-20
C
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is favorable or cycle length is moderate. >20-35
D
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is ineffective or cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.
>35-55
E
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is unfavorable and cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >55-80 F
Volume-to-capacity ratio is greater than 1.0. Progression is very poor and cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. >80 Reference for Tables 3 and 4: Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022 City of Mendota
Policy C-1.2 of the City of Mendota General Plan states that the City shall: “Seek to maintain operations on all roadways and intersections at Level of Service C or better at all times, including peak travel times, unless maintaining this Level of Service would, in the City's judgment, be infeasible and/or conflict with the achievement of other goals. Congestion in excess of Level of Service C may be accepted in these cases, provided that provisions are made to improve traffic flow and/or promote non-vehicular transportation as part of a development project or a City-initiated project.”
State Highways
Caltrans has historically endeavored to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D, but does not currently identify a specific LOS goal.

Mendota City CouncilOctober 6, 2026

Mendota City Council
October 6, 2026