Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Mendota City Council
October 6, 2026

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
October 6, 2026
Body
Mendota City Council
Pages
9
Original file
52.7 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on www.cityofmendota.com. That file is the official record.

Scopeof TrafficStudy- ProposedResidentialDevelopment October8, 2025 Mendota,California Page3
operating conditions from the traveler’s perspective and LOS F the worst.” Automobile mode LOS characteristics for both unsignalized and signalized intersections are presented in Tables 3 and 4
Table 3
Level of Service Characteristics for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)
A 0—10
B >10—15
C >15-25
D >25-35
E >35-50
F >50
Table 4
Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of Descri tion Average Vehicle
Service p Delay (seconds)
Volume—to—capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is A exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. <10 B Volume—to—capacity ratio is 119greater than 1.0. Progression is highly >10_20 favorable or the cycle length 1s very short.

C Volume—to—capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is favorable or >20_35 cycle length is moderate.

Volume—to—capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is D ineffective or cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle >35-55 failures are noticeable.

Volume—to—capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is E unfavorable and cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >55-80 Volume—to—capacity ratio is greater than 1.0. Progression is very poor and cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue.

Reference for Tables 3 and 4: Highway Capacity Manual, 7“” Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022 F >80
City of Mendota
Policy C-1.2 of the City of Mendota General Plan states that the City shall: “Seek to maintain operations on all roadways and intersections at Level of Service C or better at all times, including peak travel times, unless maintaining this Level of Service would, in the City's judgment, be infeasible and/0r conflict with the achievement of other goals. Congestion in excess of Level of Service C may be accepted in these cases, provided that provisions are made to improve traffic flow and/0r promote non-vehicular transportation as part of a development project OF61City-initiated project.”
State Highways
Caltrans has historically endeavored to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D, but does not currently identify a specific LOS goal.

Scope of Traffic Study - Proposed Residential Development October 8, 2025 Mendota, California Page 4
Study Criteria
For purposes of this study, it is suggested that a traffic issue may require improvements if the proposed Project will decrease the LOS below C at an intersection, or if the Project will exacerbate conditions at an intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS D to LOS E).

For purposes of this study, a traffic issue will be recognized at State facilities if the analyses identify LOS E or F at an intersection. LOS E and F can be indicative of delays that may lead to safety concerns at unsignalized intersections. A traffic issue will also be identified if the Project will exacerbate conditions at an intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS E to LOS F).

Intersection Queuing Criteria
A queuing deficiency is identified in the existing condition if the calculated 95th -percentile
queue length exceeds the storage length by more than 25 feet (the average storage length for one vehicle) since the bay taper can typically store one vehicle. A queuing issue is determined if the Project causes the calculated 95th
-percentile queue length to exceed the existing or
planned storage capacity of a lane by more than 25 feet. In storage lanes that are already deficient without the Project, a queuing issue is determined if the Project increases the calculated 95th
-percentile queue length by at least 25 feet.

Closing
Peters Engineering Group is requesting that the affected agencies provide any comments on the content of this letter in writing. Specifically, we are requesting comment on, or confirmation of, the following items discussed above from all affected agencies before continuing with the analyses:
• Trip generation assumptions and calculations
• Study area intersections
• The time periods requiring intersection turning movement counts • The study scenarios
• Criteria for identifying traffic issues
• Pending and approved projects
• No Project-specific traffic modeling proposed or required.

Scopeof TrafficStudy- ProposedResidentialDevelopment October8, 2025 Mendota,California Page4
Study Criteria
For purposes of this study, it is suggested that a traffic issue may require improvements if the proposed Project will decrease the LOS below C at an intersection, or if the Project will exacerbate conditions at an intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS D to LOS E).

For purposes of this study, a traffic issue will be recognized at State facilities if the analyses identify LOS E or F at an intersection. LOS E and F can be indicative of delays that may lead to safety concerns at unsignalized intersections. A traffic issue will also be identified if the Project will exacerbate conditions at an intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS E to LOS F).

Intersection Queuing Criteria
A queuing deficiency is identified in the existing condition if the calculated 95th—percentile queue length exceeds the storage length by more than 25 feet (the average storage length for one vehicle) since the bay taper can typically store one vehicle. A queuing issue is determined if the Project causes the calculated 95th-percentile queue length to exceed the existing or planned storage capacity of a lane by more than 25 feet. In storage lanes that are already deficient Without the Project, a queuing issue is determined if the Project increases the calculated 95th-percentile queue length by at least 25 feet.

Closing
Peters Engineering Group is requesting that the affected agencies provide any comments on the content of this letter in writing. Specifically, we are requesting comment on, or confirmation of, the following items discussed above from all affected agencies before continuing with the analyses:

Trip generation assumptions and calculations
Study area intersections
The time periods requiring intersection turning movement counts The study scenarios
Criteria for identifying traffic issues
Pending and approved projects
No Project-specific traffic modeling proposed or required.

Scope of Traffic Study - Proposed Residential Development October 8, 2025 Mendota, California Page 5
Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please feel free to call our office if you have any questions.

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
John Rowland, PE, TE
Attachments: Figures 1 through 4
Scopeof TrafficStudy- ProposedResidentialDevelopment October8, 2025 Mendota,California Page5
Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please feel free to call our office if you have any questions.

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
John Rowland,
W
PE, TE
Attachments: Figures 1 through 4
{PROJECTLOCATION
GONZALEZST. _
Li -"8 .22 IIIIIilII'
EEEEEEEEEEEEE 8< 0 0 - 0 |—' :15 l— g (n LLI LU ‘0 — o > > |—' Q! 3 of VE CIR
‘0 — l- S D 2 > o
0 <9
LLI (I) CANTUST. lllIIIIIlI
!‘ "I“
mi: ._
EEEEEEEE .2 CI PA I... FOURTH ST. TEST.

MENDOTA HIGH S( HOOL
LEGEND

VA PROJECTAREA
ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California

SITEVICINITYMAP
Not to Scale — @ PETERS ENGINEERING GRCILIP Figure1 —
’ 4| 2w§ 2” g
g 24? 103.4%
1! 243 250 3 $4? l mu: 1"
am& 251 g 252 Wazfi: 244
34 245 +2—
'm 242 238 235 234 2.33 232 231 2:50
241 I 92.3%mm
fi
2‘0 201 202 203 204 205 206 207
239
H
'II 238 E at my: 4. 23733 | 209 199 193 197 196195 194
fl I $5.71 623’: my;
0% §155 166 157 168 169 1m 171
fl _— _ _n__
I a 151 150 149 14s 14-; 1+6 1+5 § 55.3“:$2.34 5m: 116 117 113 119 120 121 122 159 I
‘ 158
l 15?
115 114 113 112 111 110 109
158 a. £3“: 62.3% 56.03: .H E
r8——,, “2155 I so 3‘ 32838455 as
0) . 154 a:

I}
l 153 '5
100.5% ”
.152; m 73 37 7s 35 74 73
43 i": I 3' 52.3: 59.63: 5" §
: 42 H- 45 48 4? 4s 49 50
l/ magk
1L/‘.°Z ”7135”,”.Hflil
ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California
1243 ’ ‘—
fl
:2
229 223 227
135.4%
203 209 210
193 192 191
some
93: 4’:
‘72 12:3 13
144 1+3 1+2
”1°“
135.4%
123 124 125
108 107 106
513.0%
£35.42- 8? 88 39
32 71 70

50.03: 335.4%
51 52 53
226
211
190
135
141
126
105
90 1510.63:
3‘ 78 Acres
(Basin)
x/Bm/ mi
225
212
189
”B
104
91 68
55 224 223
213 214
188 187
17? 17B
139 1.38
128 129
103 102
92 95
66 5?

SITEPLAN
@ PETERS ENGINEERING GRCILIF’
222
215
179
137
130
i g ‘l 221 220 219 m: 52.33: 55.2% :
"H 213 217 2133 if“
135 184 183 I

50.03: 62.3% 56.2%i
130 181 18$
136 135 134

50.03: 82.3% 85.23: —q 131 132
99 50.9% 825* 56.23.-
513.03 323% 55.2% i 1::lH?
133-
was; 10 61.7% “5% 55.5% Mi: 62.5% 51.1%
53:
g
g
fi
g
a I.“ '0 AMADOR AVENUE
_—d
I.
7'}.
”IF
.‘L’
1l—
I"
H
w! —_.—-.__—____ AMADOR AVENUE
,fl
”Bf—Ml

42.6%M¢\
Figure2 FM
W
m #1 “gm
L C‘) 1%U} a. I EI» I A.

NottoScale
§W \\

MENDDTA ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL \\
a
’3; 9
€0
e1"5. \
\ 0 A r: 0 BA53 AveNui f .0}.
’0 E 9)
\X RM‘REZAVENu m X our: 51' or A; 6‘ »
(PROJECTLOCATION
FOUR ST. KATE ST. I‘ll IIIII
LEGEND

VA PROJECTAREA
ProposedResidentialDevelopment
Mendota,California

PROJECTTRAFFICDISTRIBUTIONPERCENTAGES
Not to Scale — FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP Figure3
0‘9“"
4VW/s \\

MENDDTA ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL \\
e [PROJECTLOCATION 7217 IIIIIIIIII I KATE ST. FOUR ST. figllllllllllllllllll II a“) vo
‘2‘ 51%
ASHLNGTON ELEM ‘ 00L
I 8 ( 6 3 ) 0 wouldremainin theCity
IIIIII E.— z-I; E‘s.,
/ > k;
_ -
.
'
- .
. E. \
\
l l \
LEGEND
@ PROJECTAREA
ProposedResidentialDevelopment xx(w) AM(PM)VOLUMES
Mendota,California

PEAK-HOURPROJECTTRAFFICVOLUMES
NottoScale — FE PETERS ENGINEERING BRDUP Figure4
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
City of Mendota Response
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT
City of Mendota Response

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
1 John Rowland
From: Michael Osborn <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2025 7:07 AM
To: Derek Sylvester; Jeff O'Neal
Cc: John Rowland; Alison Baker; Adrienne Burns
Subject: Re: Crown Mendota Project -
John & Y&H Team,
The Traffic Scoping letter is appropriate from the City's perspective. Please send to Caltrans and County for their input.

The City has one upcoming street project that would impact this development: the Amador & Smoot Street Extension which extends partial widths (two lanes in each direction) of Amador & Smoot from their current terminus to their intersection. This project is planned to be built in Spring 2026.

Sincerely,
Michael Osborn, PE, CASp, LEED-AP
Office: (559) 449-2700
Mobile: (805) 705-5222
From: Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2025 3:00 PM
To: Michael Osborn <[email protected]>; Jeff O'Neal <[email protected]> Cc: John Rowland <[email protected]>; Alison Baker <[email protected]>; Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Crown Mendota Project -

Good afternoon Michael and Jeff,

Following up here on the traffic scoping letter for the Crown project we sent over to you last week. Please let us know if you have any input on the proposed scope and if you will be forwarding to Caltrans and the County or would like us to.

Thank you,

Derek Sylvester
Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc.

O: (559) 244-3123 | M: (559) 360-5006
yandhengr.com

From: Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 8:16 AM
To: Michael Osborn <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff O'Neal <[email protected]>; Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>; John Rowland <johnrowland@petersengineering.com>; Alison Baker <[email protected]> Subject: Crown Mendota Project Traffic Scoping Letter
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
John Rowland
From: Michael Osborn <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2025 7:07 AM
To: Derek Sylvester;Jeff O'Neal
Cc: John Rowland;Alison Baker;Adrienne Burns
Subject: Re:Crown Mendota Project -
John &Y&H Team,
The Traffic Scoping letter is appropriate from the City's perspective. Please send to Caltrans and County for their input.

The City has one upcoming street project that would impact this development: the Amador & Smoot Street Extension which extends partial widths (two lanes in each direction) of Amador & Smoot from their current terminus to their intersection. This project is planned to be built in Spring 2026.

Sincerely,
Michael Osborn, PE, CASp, LEED-AP
Office: (559) 449-2700
Mobile: (805) 705-5222
From: Derek Sylvester <DSy|vester@yhmai|.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2025 3:00 PM
To: Michael Osborn <[email protected]>; Jeff O'Neal <jonea|@ppeng.com> Cc:John Rowland <johnrow|[email protected]>; Alison Baker <[email protected]>; Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>
Subject:RE:Crown Mendota Project - Some people who received this messagedon't often get email from [email protected] .why this is important
Good afternoon Michael and Jeff,
Following up here on the traffic scoping letter for the Crown project we sent over to you last week. Please let us know if you have any input on the proposed scope and if you will be forwarding to Caltrans and the County or would like us to.

Thankyou,
Derek Sylvester
Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc.
0: (559) 244-3123 |M: (559) 360-5006
vandhenqrcom
From:Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 8:16 AM
To: Michael Osborn <[email protected]>
Cc:Jeff O'Neal <jonea|@ppeng.com>; Derek Sylvester <DSy|vester@yhmai|.com>;John Rowland <johnrow|and@petersengineering.com>; Alison Baker <[email protected]> Subject:Crown Mendota Project Traffic Scoping Letter
2 Good Morning Michael,

Hope all is well. We are submitting to you the Traffic Scoping Letter for the Crown project located on the west side of the city of Mendota. I have attached the conceptual map as well for reference. We would like to get your input on the scope of the proposed study. Also, we wanted to give you the option of distributing the letter further to Caltrans and the County. Please let us know if you would prefer that we distribute that out instead. Looking forward to your response.

Please note that we are looking to submit the Tentative Map in the coming week or two.

Thank you.

Adrienne Burns
Planning & Entitlements
______________________
2985 N. Burl Ave. Suite 101 Fresno, CA 93727
O: (559) 244-3123 | M: (559) 779-3971
yandhengr.com
“A committed team providing high quality engineering services for our clients and community.”

Good Morning Michael,
Hope all is well. We are submitting to you the Traffic Scoping Letter for the Crown project located on the west side of the city of Mendota. l have attached the conceptual map as well for reference. We would like to get your input on the scope of the proposed study. Also, we wanted to give you the option of distributing the letter further to Caltrans and the County. Please let us know if you would prefer that we distribute that out instead. Looking forward to your response.

Please note that we are looking to submit the Tentative Map in the coming week or two.

Thankyou.

Adrienne Burns
Planning & Entitlements
Yamaha E IIIII'I'I
Bum, II__I_I;._.
0“!»WW???“' W9 WW
2985 N. Burl Ave. Suite 101 Fresno, CA 93727
O: (559) 244-3123 |M: (559) 779-3971
vandhenqmom
“A committed team providing high quality engineering services for our clients and community.” TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
County of Fresno Response
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT
County of Fresno Response

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
1 John Rowland
From: Luna, Hector <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 1:34 PM
To: John Rowland; Nakagawa, Wendy; Mtunga, Tawanda
Cc: Adrienne Burns; Derek Sylvester; Alison Baker; Michael Osborn; Jeff O'Neal Subject: RE: Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota Good afternoon,
The Transportation Planning Unit concurs with the study areas proposed in the scoping document.

Regards,
Hector E. Luna| Principal Planner
Department of Public Works and Planning |
Water and Natural Resources Division
2220 Tulare St. 6th Floor Fresno, CA 93721
Main Oice: (559) 600-4292 | Direct: (559) 600-9672
Email: [email protected]
Your input matters! Customer Service Survey
From: John Rowland <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 2:20 PM
To: Luna, Hector <[email protected]>; Nakagawa, Wendy <[email protected]>; Mtunga, Tawanda <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>; Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>; Alison Baker <[email protected]>; Michael Osborn <[email protected]>; Jeff O'Neal <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota Hello County staff,
Checking back to see if you plan to comment on the aached scoping leer. The City of Mendota is the lead agency.

Thanks,
John Rowland
(559) 299-1544 Ext. 112
From: John Rowland
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2025 5:23 PM
To: Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; Jones, Keyomi L@DOT <[email protected]>; Luna, Hector <[email protected]>; Nakagawa, Wendy <[email protected]>; Mtunga, Tawanda <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>; Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>; Alison Baker <[email protected]>; Michael Osborn <[email protected]>; Jeff O'Neal <[email protected]> Subject: Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota
John Rowland
From: Luna, Hector <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday,November 19, 2025 1:34 PM
To: John Rowland; Nakagawa,Wendy; Mtunga, Tawanda
Cc: Adrienne Burns;DerekSylvester;Alison Baker;Michael Osborn; Jeff O'Neal Subject: RE:Traffic Study Scope- Crown Homes, Mendota
Good afternoon,
The Transportation Planning Unit concurs with the study areas proposed in the scoping document.

Regards,
C Hector E. Luna| PrincipalPlanner
Department of Public Works and Planning|
Water and Natural Resources Division
(‘53 ED] 2220 Tulare St. 6th Floor Fresno, CA 93721
0 Main Office: (559) 600-4292 | Direct: (559) 600-9672
*5 Email: [email protected] Your input matters! Customer Service Survey From: John Rowland <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 2:20 PM
To: Luna, Hector <[email protected]>; Nakagawa, Wendy <[email protected]>; Mtunga, Tawanda <[email protected]>
Cc:Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>; Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>; Alison Baker <[email protected]>; Michael Osborn <[email protected]>; Jeff O'Neal <jonea|@ppeng.com> Subject:RE:Traffic Study Scope- Crown Homes, Mendota
Hello County staff,
Checkingback to see if you plan to comment on the attached scoping letter. The City of Mendota is the lead agency.

Thanks,
John Rowland
(559) 299—1544Ext. 112
From: John Rowland
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2025 5:23 PM
To: Padilla, Dave@DOT <dave.padi|[email protected]>; Jones, Keyomi L@DOT <[email protected]>; Luna, Hector <[email protected]>; Nakagawa, Wendy <[email protected]>; Mtunga, Tawanda <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrienne Burns <ABurns@vhmai|.com>; Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>; Alison Baker <[email protected]>; Michael Osborn <[email protected]>; Jeff O'Neal <[email protected]> Subject:Traffic Study Scope- Crown Homes, Mendota
2 Hello County of Fresno and Caltrans staff,
Aached is a traffic study scoping leer for a residenal project proposed in Mendota. Please let us know if your agency has any comments on the leer. If you would be so kind as to reply to confirm receipt I would appreciate it. Also, if there is anyone else at your agency who should review the leer, would you please forward it to them? Finally, City consultants Michael Osborn and Jeff O’Neal are copied on this email, and I would request that you include them in your correspondence.

Thanks,
John Rowland, PE, TE
Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
(559) 299-1544 Ext. 112
Hello County of Fresno and Caltrans staff,
Attached is a traffic study scoping letter for a residential project proposed in Mendota. Pleaselet us know if your agency has any comments on the letter. If you would be so kind as to reply to confirm receipt I would appreciate it. Also, if there is anyone else at your agency who should review the letter, would you please forward it to them? Finally, City consultants Michael Osborn and Jeff O’Neal are copied on this email, and I would request that you include them in your correspondence.

Thanks,
John Rowland, PE, TE

PETERS ENGINEERING GRCILIP
862 Pollasky Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
(559) 299-1544 Ext. 112
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Caltrans Response
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT
Caltrans Response

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.” DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778-2616 (559) 981-7284| FAX (559) 488-4195 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
October 30, 2025
FRE-33-62.157
Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota
GTS #: https://ld-igr-gts.dot.ca.gov/district/6/report/38317#55777

SENT VIA EMAIL
Mr. Michael Osborn
City of Mendota City Engineer
c/o Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, Inc.
455 West Fir Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
[email protected]
Dear Mr. Osborn:

Caltrans has completed the review of the Traffic Study Scope for Crown Homes, Mendota. The project proposes 271 single-family homes. Access to the site will be via three local streets connecting to Amador Avenue The proposed single-family residential subdivision covers approximately 49.99 acres.

The project site is located west of the existing segment of Amador Avenue, extending roughly from north of Gonzalez Street to south of Silva Street.

The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment. The Local Development Review (LDR) process reviews land use projects and plans through the lenses of our mission and state planning priorities of infill, conservation, and travel‐efficient development. To ensure a safe and efficient transportation system, we encourage early consultation and coordination with local jurisdictions and project proponents on all development projects that utilize the multimodal transportation network.

Caltrans provides the following comments consistent with the State’s smart mobility goals that support a vibrant economy and sustainable communities:

1. On page two, within the Study Area section, one additional intersection should be included: SR 33 and SR 180 intersection (include AM/PM peak, 95th percentile queue lengths, storage vs demand, and possible spillback assessment.)

CALIFORNIA STATETRANSPORTATIONAGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, GOVERNOR California Department of Transportation
DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778—2616 W (559) 981—7284l FAX (559) 488—4195 | TTY 71 1
www.doi.ca.qov
October 30, 2025
FIRE-3362.157
Traffic: Study Scope — Crown Homes, Mendo’ro
GTS #: h’r’rps://|d-iqr—g’rs.do’r.c0.qov/dis’rricT/é/report/38317#55777

SENT VIA EMAIL
Mr. Michael Osborn
Ci’ry of Mendofo CiTyEngineer
C/O Provost & PriTchord Consulting Group, Inc.
455 West Fir Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
[email protected]
Dear Mr. Osborn:

Col’rrons has completed the review of The Traffic S’rudy Scope for Crown Homes, Mendo’ro. The project proposes 271 single—family homes. Access To The site will be via Three local sfree’rs connecting ’ro Amodor Avenue The proposed single—family residential subdivision covers approximately 49.99 acres.

The project site is locofed west of The existing segmenf of Amodor Avenue, extending roughly from north of Gonzalez S’rreeT’ro sou’rh of Silva STree’r.

The mission of Colfrons is To provide CI safe and reliable Transportation ne’rwork ’rho’r serves all people and respects The environment. The Local Development Review (LDR) process reviews land use projects and plans Through The lenses of our mission and skate planning priorities of infill, conservofion, 0nd Travel-efficient development. To ensure CI safe and efficient Transportation sys’rem, we encourage early consulfofion and coordination with local jurisdictions and project proponents on all development projecfs Tho’rU’rilize The mul’rimodol Transportation nefwork.

Col’rrons provides The following comments consisfen’r with The SToTe’s smurf mobili’ry goals ’rhG’r support 0 vibrant economy and sustainable communities:

1. On page ’rwo, wiThin The S’rudy Area section, one additional intersection should be included: SR 33 and SR 180 intersection (include AM/PM peak, 95Th percentile queue lengths, storage vs demand, and possible spillbock assessment) “Provide a safe and reliable ’rranspor’ro’rionne’rwork ’rho’r serves all people and respecTs the environment." Mr. Michael Osborn– Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota October 30, 2025

Page 2 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.”

2. Although the project does not directly front SR 33 and SR 180, it lies within one mile of a major state facility and will contribute to traffic using the SR 33 and SR 180 intersection. As such, it is recommended that frontage improvements (e.g., add storage, channelization, access control) be incorporated along the project’s local roadway interfaces to support safe and efficient access to the regional network.

3. According to the Caltrans Local Development Review Safety Practitioner’s Guidance dated February 2024, a safety review for a development is not required if the project makes no physical modification to the SHS and the project results in zero additional trips by any mode on the SHS. Since the proposed development is adding trips to the State Highway System (SHS), a safety review will be required.

The safety review should identify and analyze any potential safety impacts due to the increased conflicts. Perform 95th-percentile queuing at all study intersections, with a dedicated subsection for SHS locations (SR facilities). Report available storage (pocket + taper), deceleration lane length, compare to 95th-percentile queues, and assessing spillback potential. The developer should request Caltrans crash data summary for the involved SHS facility using the included Crash Data Request Form. Identify feasible safety countermeasures if warranted.

4. Please be advised. There is a Caltrans State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) and Minor Program project planned for a Class II Bike Lane (Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure) at nearby SR 33/Belmont Avenue. The projects advertised for the year 2032/2033.

5. Alternative transportation policies should be applied to the development. An assessment of multi-modal facilities should be conducted to develop an integrated multi-modal transportation system to serve and help alleviate traffic congestion caused by the project and related development in this area of the city. The assessment should include the following:
a. Pedestrian walkways should link this Project to transit facilities, bicycle pathways and other walkways in the surrounding area.
b. Coordinating connections to local and regional bicycle pathways should be done to further encourage the use of bicycles for commuter and recreational purposes.
c. Transit service and bus stop accommodations should be extended to within ¼- mile of the Project site.

6. Caltrans recommends the Project implement “smart growth” principles regarding parking solutions, providing alternative transportation choices to residents and employees. Alternative transportation choices may include but are not limited to parking for carpools/vanpools, car-share and/or ride-share programs.

Mr. Michael Osborn— Traffic: S’rudy Scope — Crown Homes, Mendo’ro October 30, 2025
Poge2

2. Although The projecf does not direc’rly front SR 33 and SR180,it lies within one mile of C!major sTo’re facility and will contribute ’ro Traffic using The SR33 and SR 180 intersection. As such, it is recommended ’rhOT fronfoge improvemenfs (e.g.,odd storage, chonnelizofion, access control) be incorporated along The projecf’s local roadway interfaces To support safe and efficienf access To The regional network.

According To The Col’rrons Local Development Review Sofe’ry Practitioner’s Guidance do’red February 2024,o sofe’ry review for 0 development is noT required if The project makes no physical modificofion To The SHSand The project results in zero additional Trips by any mode on The SHS.Since the proposed development is adding trips to the State Highway System (SHS), a safety review will be required.

The sofe’ry review should identify and analyze any poTen’riol sofe’ry impoc’rs due To The increased conflicts. Perform 95Th-percenfile queuing of all sTudy infersecfions, with 0 dedicated subsection for SHSlocofions (SR facilities). Report available storage (pocket + Taper), deceleration lone leng’rh, compare ’ro 95Th-percen’rile queues, and assessing spillbock potential. The developer should requesf Col’rrons crash do’ro summary for The involved SHSfocilify using The included Crash Da’ra Request Form. Iden’rify feasible safety countermeasures if warranted.

Please be advised. There is o Col’rrons STGTeHighway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) and Minor Program project planned for 0 Class II Bike Lone (Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure) of nearby SR 33/Belmon’r Avenue. The projects odverfised for The year 2032/2033.

Al’remofive Tronsporfofion policies should be applied To The development. An assessment of mul’ri—modol focilifies should be conducted To develop on in’regro’red mul’ri—modol Tronsporfofion sys’rem To serve and help alleviate Traffic congestion caused by The project and relofed development in this area of The ciTy. The assessment should include The following:
o. Pedestrian walkways should link ThisProject To Transit facilities, bicycle pathways and o’rherwolkwoys in The surrounding area.
b. Coordinating connections To local and regional bicycle po’rhwoys should be done To fur’rher encourage The use of bicycles for commuter and recreational purposes.

C. Transi’r service and bus sTop accommodations should be extended ’ro wi’rhin ‘A— mile of The Project si’re.

Colfrons recommends The Project implemenf “smorf growth” principles regarding parking solufions, providing alternative Transportation Choices ’ro residents and employees. Alfemo’rive Tronsporfofion Choices may include but are not limi’red ’ro parking for corpools/vanpools, cor—shore and/or ride—shore programs. ”Provide a safe and reliable ’rronspor’ro’rionne’rwork ’rho’r serves all people and respecTs the environment." Mr. Michael Osborn– Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota October 30, 2025

Page 3 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.”

7. Based on Caltrans Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide, dated May 20, 2020, and effective as of July 1, 2020, Caltrans seeks to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips, provide a safe transportation system, reduce per capita VMT, increase accessibility to destinations via cycling, walking, carpooling, transit and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Caltrans recommends that the project proponent continue to work with the city to further implement improvements to reduce VMT and offer a variety of transportation modes for its employees.

If you have any other questions, please call or email: Keyomi Jones, Associate Transportation Planner at (559) 981-7284 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Mr. Dave Padilla, Branch Chief,
Local Development Review Branch
Cc: John Rowland, PE, TE Peters Engineering Group [email protected] Mr. Michael Osborn— Traffic: S’rudy Scope — Crown Homes, Mendo’ro October 30, 2025
Poge3

7. Based on Col’rrans Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)—Focused Transportation Impoc’r S’rudy Guide, dofed May 20, 2020,and effective as of July 1, 2020,Col’rrons seeks To reduce single occupancy vehicle Trips, provide CIsafe Transportation sys’rem, reduce per capi’ro VMT, increase occessibilify To desfinofions via cycling, walking, carpooling, Tronsif and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Col’rrons recommends That The project proponenf continue To work with The city To further implement improvements To reduce VMT and offer a variety of Transportation modes for ifs employees.

If you have any other questions, please call or email: Keyomi Jones, Associate Transportation Planner at (559) 981—7284or keyomi.jones@do’r.co.gov.

Sincerely,
; W
Mr. Dove Padilla, Branch Chief,
Local Development Review Branch
Cc: John Rowland, PE, TEPe’rers Engineering Group JohnRowlond@pe’rers—enqineerinq.Com “Provide a safe and reliable ’rranspor’ro’rionne’rwork ’rhG’r serves all people and respecTs the environment." TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX B

TRAFFIC COUNT DATA SHEETS
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX B

TRAFFIC COUNT DATA SHEETS

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 7 1 1 4 43 39 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 35 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 22 1 4 11 47 38 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 55 8 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 27 1 2 15 82 119 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 77 9 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 5 0 48 6 1 14 126 97 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 112 5 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 2 0 41 3 2 7 91 70 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 129 6 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 25 5 4 5 57 28 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 47 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 18 2 0 5 48 28 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 55 4 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 20 2 2 11 64 39 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 50 7 TOTAL 7 0 208 21 16 72 558 458 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 560 44 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 76 9 6 18 103 68 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 108 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 66 7 2 14 104 76 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 124 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 64 6 4 21 111 65 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 105 5 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 45 5 1 16 104 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 107 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 57 5 3 17 106 84 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 117 3 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 53 6 6 13 104 85 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 108 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 45 2 4 14 102 62 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 121 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 54 4 3 12 110 70 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 104 0 TOTAL 0 0 460 44 29 125 844 581 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 0 894 11 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 7 0 138 11 9 47 346 324 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 373 28 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 232 23 10 68 425 296 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 453 9 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.756 5.4% PM 0 296 425 68 0.953
PM 0.962 2.1% AM 0 324 346 47 0.756
PHF ##### #####
AM PM
0 0 373 453
0 0 0 0
0 0 58 15
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.753 0.929 PHF

0.661 7 0 138 11 AM

0.873 0 0 232 23 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Oller St
Northbound Westbound
Derrick Ave
Derrick Ave
Turning Movement Report
Oller St @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7605
-120.3863 COLLECTION DATE
imt 7m0AM-7fl5AM
7fl5AM-730AM
730AM-7M5AM
7M5AM-8m0AM
BmOAM-8H5AM
8fl5AM-830AM
830AM-8M5AM
8M5AM-9mOAM
TOTAL
fime
4m0PM-4n5PM
4fl5PM-430PM
430FM-4M5PM
4M5PM-5mOPM
5m0PM-5n5PM
5fl5PM-530PM
530FM-5M5PM
5m5PM-6m0PM
TOTAL

PEAK HOUR
7:15 -

LOCATION
COUNTY _| NOOONO‘IOOO ‘F_| 000000000 0.756

0.962 000000000 000000000 0 O 5.4%2.1%
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com Oller St @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
7 1 1 4 22 1 4 11
27 1 2 15
48 6 1 14
41 3 2 7
25 5 4 5
18 2 O 5
20 2 2 11
208 21 16 72
76 9 6 18
66 7 2 14
64 6 4 21
45 5 1 16
57 5 3 17
53 6 6 13
45 2 4 14
54 4 3 12
460 44 29 125 '0'I1
43 39
47 38
82 119
126 97
91 7O
57 28
48 28
64 39
558 458
103 68
104 76
111 65
104 71
106 84
104 85
102 62
110 70
844 581
346 324
425 296
PM
AM
W
0 AM

0.661

LATITUDE

LONGITUDE WEATHER
O 10 0 0 O 9 0 0 O 6 0 0 O 10 0 0 O 9 0 0 O 6 0 0 O 6 0 0 O 5 0 0 0 61 0 0
O 4 0 0 O 8 0 0 O 2 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 3 0 0 O 4 0 0 O 5 0 0 O 7 0 0 0 33 0 0
0 34 0 0
0 13 0 0
Derrick Ave
0 296 425 68
0 324 346 iTtb
Turning Movement Report 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 0 0
0 0 PHF
o.

0.756
AM

1. h o
Noflh _fl11r>
138 1 1
0 0 232 23 Derrick Ave
'58
9‘ 0 0.753 AM
PM
Prepared For:

36.7605
-120.3863 Clear OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO 453 OOOOOOOOO AOO—‘OOOOO (DWOOOOO'IO'INN wh Peters Engineering Group OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO
58 0
15 0
Oller St
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis, CA 93612
35 3 55 8
77 9 112 5
129 6
47 2
55 4
50 7
560 44
108 1
124 0 105 5
107 1
117 3 108 0
121 1
104 0 894 11

Page 1 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 5 PM 0 0 0 1
PM Peak Total 0 2 AM 0 0 0 1 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
4 0 0 0 AM
1 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Oller St @ Derrick Ave 36.7605
Fresno -120.3863
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Derrick Ave
0 Oller St
Derrick Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Metro Traffic Data Inc. TU rn i “9 Movement Report 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 . I Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
' ' ' ' Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612 LOCATION Oller St @ Derrick Ave LATITUDE 36.7605 COUNTY Fresno LONGITUDE -120.3863 COLLECTION DATE Thursday, December 11, 2025 WEATHER Clear 7 Time 7:00AM- 7:15AM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o 0
7:15AM-7:30 AM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 o o o o o
7:30AM- 7:45AM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
7:45AM- 8:00AM 0 o o 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o
8:00AM-8:15 AM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15AM-8:30 AM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
8:30AM- 8:45AM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o
8:45AM- 9:00 AM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 o o 1 o o o 4 o o o o o o o 0
Time 4:00PM- 4:15PM 0 o o 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
4:15PM- 4:30PM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
4:30PM- 4:45PM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
4:45PM- 5:00PM 0 o o 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 o o o o o
5:00PM- 5:15PM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
5:15PM- 5:30PM o o o 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
5:30PM- 5:45PM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 o o o o o
5:45PM- 6:00PM 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 o o 2 o o o 4 o o o o o o o o
' F PEAKHOUR '.
7:1 - 3:15 o o o 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 o o o o 0
4:1 - o o o 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 o o o o o
Derrick Ave
Peds <>
r- T 0 I 5 | PM 0 0 0 |
PeakT o I 2 I AM 0 0 0 | 1
— A — — V§ 0 4‘ |
a AM PM
0 0 I; L 0 0
9 o 0 ‘ ® _ o o m
Nonh ° 0 I1 1- ° °
Peds <> 1
g
>E [.1
mil}
O Peds<>
4 | 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 PM
Derrick Ave Page 2 of 3
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
Oller St /
Clear
Roundabout
COMMENTS NE Leg is incomplete.

Page 3 of 3 ends

N/A
Turning Movement Report
Oller St @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
LOCATION Derrick Ave / Derrick Ave
COUNTY

COLLECTION DATE

CYCLE TIME
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com
Oller St @ Derrick Ave
Fresno Thursday, December 11, 2025 N/A
Turning Movement Report

NIS STREET

EIW STREET

WEATHER

CONTROL TYPE
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612
Derrick Ave / Derrick Ave Oller St / Clear Roundabout
COMMENTS NE Leg is incomplete.

Noflh

Page 3 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 1 1 1 1 0 3 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 6 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 12 3 0 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 5 6 3 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 1 8 4 0 0 47 12 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 9 10 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 1 12 6 0 0 73 18 6 10 0 2 4 2 0 0 7 6 41 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 6 5 0 0 13 5 4 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 8 12 60 3 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 1 4 0 0 0 5 3 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 8 13 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 3 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 5 12 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 1 6 0 0 0 8 3 2 0 0 2 3 3 1 0 1 5 10 1 TOTAL 0 5 40 16 1 1 166 50 16 16 0 11 18 8 4 0 28 56 158 14 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 1 6 1 0 0 18 7 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 26 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 4 1 0 0 10 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 37 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 8 4 0 0 18 6 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 5 29 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 1 4 0 0 0 20 8 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 7 33 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 5 3 1 0 21 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 3 35 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 7 3 0 0 19 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 36 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 6 3 0 0 23 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 39 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 6 0 0 0 14 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 3 21 0 TOTAL 0 2 46 15 1 0 143 61 2 2 0 5 11 1 0 0 19 26 256 0 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 3 30 15 0 0 138 38 12 14 0 6 10 4 0 0 24 35 124 7 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 1 22 9 1 0 83 30 1 1 0 2 5 1 0 0 9 14 143 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.615 4.8% PM 1 30 83 0 0.95
PM 0.949 0.6% AM 12 38 138 0 0.485
PHF 0.667 0.625
AM PM
0 0 124 143
2 6 35 14
5 10 24 9
1 4 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.572 0.922 PHF

0.618 0 3 30 15 AM

0.775 0 0 22 9 PM
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Sorensen Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7553
-120.3890

Page 1 of 3 ends

Smoot Ave
Northbound Westbound
Smoot Ave
Sorensen Ave
Sorensen Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc. TU rn i ng Movement Report 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 . I Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: ' ' ' ' Peters Engineering Group 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612 LOCATION Smoot Ave @ Sorensen Ave LATITUDE 36.7553 COUNTY Fresno LONGITUDE -120.3890 COLLECTION DATE Thursday, December 11, 2025 WEATHER Clear imt 7:00 AM -7:15 AM 0 1 1 1 1 0 3 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 O O 6 6 3 7:15AM -7:30 AM 0 0 2 0 O O 12 3 0 2 0 0 3 0 2 O 1 5 6 3 7:30 AM -7:45 AM 0 1 8 4 0 O 47 12 O 4 0 0 1 0 O O 7 9 10 3 7:45 AM -8:00 AM 0 1 12 6 0 0 73 18 6 10 0 2 4 2 O O 7 6 41 0 8:00 AM -8:15 AM 0 0 6 5 O O 13 5 4 0 0 2 4 1 O O 8 12 60 3 8:15AM -8:30 AM 0 1 4 0 O O 5 3 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 8 13 1 8:30 AM -8:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 3 1 0 0 2 2 1 O O 2 5 12 0 8:45 AM -9:00 AM 0 1 6 0 0 0 8 3 2 0 0 2 3 3 1 O 1 5 10 1 TOTAL 0 5 40 16 1 1 166 50 16 16 0 11 18 8 4 0 28 56 158 14 Time U-T
4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 1 6 1 0 O 18 7 O 0 0 1 2 0 O O 2 1 26 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 4 1 0 0 1O 8 O 0 0 1 1 0 O O 1 3 37 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 8 4 0 O 18 6 1 0 0 1 2 0 O O 3 5 29 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 1 4 0 0 O 20 8 1 0 0 1 2 0 O O 3 7 33 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 5 3 1 O 21 9 O 0 0 0 2 0 O O 3 3 35 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 7 3 O O 19 7 O 0 0 0 1 1 O O O 1 36 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 6 3 0 O 23 6 O 1 0 1 0 0 O O 3 3 39 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 6 0 0 0 14 1O 0 1 0 0 1 0 O O 4 3 21 0 TOTAL 0 2 46 15 1 0 143 61 2 2 0 5 11 1 0 0 19 26 256 0 F PEAK HOUR —
7:30 - 0 3 30 15 O O 138 38 12 14 0 6 10 4 0 0 24 35 124 7 Sorensen Ave E
I 0.615 4.8% PM 1 30 83 0 0.949 0.6% AM 12 38 1380.485 | P F 0.625 AM PM
o o p L 124 143
2 6 P _ 35 14
SmootAve 5 10 P North r 24 9 SmootAve
1 4 h c o 0
PM AM 0.572 PHF P_HF

0.618 30 15 AM
o o 22 9 PM
Sorensen Ave

Page 1 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 10
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 2
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 4
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 3
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
TOTAL 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 24
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 2
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 8
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 9
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 5
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 72 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 1 17 AM 0 0 0 8 Peds <>
5 9
AM PM
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
30 7
Peds <>
25 0 0 0 AM
3 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Sorensen Ave
Smoot Ave Smoot Ave
Sorensen Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Sorensen Ave 36.7553
Fresno -120.3890
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc. TU rn i “9 Movement Report 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 . I Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:
' ' ' ' Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612 LOCATION Smoot Ave @ Sorensen Ave LATITUDE 36.7553 COUNTY Fresno LONGITUDE 420.3890 COLLECTION DATE Thursday, December 11, 2025 WEATHER Clear 7 Time
7:00AM- 7:15AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
7:15AM-7:3oAM 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 10
7:30AM- 7:45AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 2
7:45AM-8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 4
8:00AM-8:15 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 3
8:15AM-8:30 AM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
8:30AM- 8:45AM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45AM- 9:00AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
TOTAL 0 o o 23 o o o 27 o o o 35 o o o 24
Time 4:00PM- 4:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
4:15PM- 4:30PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
4:30PM- 4:45PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45PM- 5:00PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
5:00PM- 5:15PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:15PM- 5:30PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30PM- 5:45PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 2
5:45PM- 6:00PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 o o 3 o o o 4 o o o 9 o o 1 8
7 - 8:30 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 9
4: - 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 5
Sorensen Ave
Peds <>
r- T 0 I 72 | PM 0 0 0
PeakT 1 I 17 I AM 0 0 0 8 Peds
AM PM <> to
Smoot Ave 0 0 ‘ ® _ o 0 SmootAve 1,g
>Z 1, ('DD. (D
A
V I;I‘ 00O Peds<>
25 0 0 0 AM
Sorensen Ave Page2 of 3
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Sorensen Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Sorensen Ave / Sorensen Ave
Smoot Ave / Smoot Ave
Clear
All-way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

LOCATION
COUNTY

COLLECTION DATE

CYCLE TIME
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com
Smoot Ave @ Sorensen Ave
Fresno Thursday, December 11, 2025 N/A
dOLS
—<> MNISTOP dOlS
Turning Movement Report

NIS STREET

EIW STREET

WEATHER

CONTROL TYPE

COMMENTS
4}-
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612
Sorensen Ave / Sorensen Ave Smoot Ave / Smoot Ave Clear All-way Stop

Page 3 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 12 14 0 3 0 0 41 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 8 26 0 3 0 0 32 3 5 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 17 37 0 5 0 0 103 8 4 0 8 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 40 65 0 2 0 0 113 13 6 0 10 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 70 48 0 5 0 0 70 7 2 0 6 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 19 31 0 3 0 0 34 4 5 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 15 24 0 0 0 0 26 3 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 12 24 0 3 0 0 41 2 3 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 193 269 0 24 0 0 460 40 30 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 22 77 0 6 0 0 88 8 2 0 5 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 35 68 0 2 0 0 78 6 3 0 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 34 71 0 4 0 0 70 5 3 0 4 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 32 57 0 2 0 0 73 10 1 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 39 75 0 2 0 0 80 2 1 0 3 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 32 61 0 5 0 0 79 4 1 0 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 39 52 0 2 0 0 62 10 1 0 4 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 21 59 0 2 0 0 65 3 4 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 254 520 0 25 0 0 595 48 16 0 23 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 146 181 0 15 0 0 320 32 17 0 28 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 140 271 0 10 0 0 301 23 8 0 9 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.734 4.7% PM 23 301 0 0 0.964
PM 0.933 2.2% AM 32 320 0 0 0.698
PHF 0.891 0.5
AM PM
0 0 0 0
9 28 0 0
0 0 0 0
73 111 0 0
PM AM
PHF
##### ##### PHF

0.693 0 146 181 0 AM

0.901 0 140 271 0 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Northbound Westbound
Smoot Ave
Derrick Ave
Derrick Ave
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7553
-120.3867 LOCATION

COUNTY COLLECTION DATE
imt 7m0AM-7fl5AM
7fl5AM-730AM
730AM-7M5AM
7M5AM-8m0AM
BmOAM-SHSAM
8fl5AM-830AM
830AM-8M5AM
8M5AM-9mOAM
TOTAL
fime
4m0PM-4n5PM
4fl5PM-430PM
430FM-4M5PM
4M5PM-5mOPM
5m0PM-5n5PM
5fl5PM-530PM
530FM-5M5PM
5m5PM-6m0PM
TOTAL

PEAK HOUR
7:30 - OOOOOOOOO U-Tur
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com Smoot Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
3 OOOOOOOOO (DOOOU'INU'ICDCD
N
hOOOOOOOOO

LATITUDE

LONGITUDE WEATHER
o 41 o 4 o o 32 3 5 o o 103 8 4 o o 113 13 6 o 0 7o 7 2 o o 34 4 5 o o 26 3 1 o o 41 2 3 o o 460 40 30 0 Turning Movement Report
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis, CA 93612

36.7553
-120.3867 Clear
1 0 3 O O O O 0 0
1 0 3 O O O O O 0
8 0 39 O O O O 0 0 10 0 48 O O O O 0 0 6 0 18 O O O O 0 0 4 0 6 O O O O 0 0
1 0 4 O O O O 0 0 2 0 7 O O O O 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 00000000 0.734

0.933

4.7%

2.2%
a OOOOOOOOO
N0| OOOOOOOOO 'U“H
Smoot Ave 0
O 88 8 2 0 O 78 6 3 0
0 7O 5 3 0 O 73 1O 1 0 O 80 2 1 0 O 79 4 1 0 O 62 1O 1 0 O 65 3 4 0 0 595 48 16 0
5 0 16 O O O O 0 0 2 0 11 O O O O 0 0
4 0 19 O O O O 0 0 0 0 23 O O O O 0 0 3 0 20 O O O O 0 0 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 0 22 O O O O 0 0 1 0 13 O O O O 0 0 23 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 320 32 17 0 28 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 301 23 8 0 9 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0
DerrickAve PHF
PM 23 301 0 0 - AM 32 320 0 0 O.698|

0.5 AM PM op t.| o o
28 P _| o o o P North r| o o
111h c o 0
AM
##5## PHF P_HF —

0.693 146 181 0 AM
0 140 271 0 PM
DerrickAve

Page 1 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 34
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 1 35 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 0 4 AM 0 0 0 2 Peds <>
2 32
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
1 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Derrick Ave 36.7553
Fresno -120.3867
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Derrick Ave
Smoot Ave 0
Derrick Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes

LOCATION
COUNTY

COLLECTION DATE
7 Time
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM
TOTAL
fime 4m0PM-4H5PM
4H5PM-430PM
430FM-4M5PM
4m5PM-5m0PM
5m0PM-5H5PM
5fl5PM-530PM
530FM-5M5PM
5m5PM-6m0PM
TOTAL

PEAK HOUR
7 - 8:30
4:1 -
Peak T
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o o o 7 o o o 1 o 1 o o o o o 34
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o o o 2 o o o o o o o o o o o 4
0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32
0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Derrick Ave
Peds <> 1 I 35 | PM 0 0 0 l o |4—I AM o o o | 2
— A — — V4'; 32 A 3 AM PM
0 0 I; L 0 0 SmootAve 0 1 ‘ ® _ 0 0 Q
Nonh ° 0 I1 1- ° °
PM AM 0 fl 0 %
Peds <> _ a
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com
Smoot Ave @ Derrick Ave LATITUDE
Fresno LONGITUDE
Thursday, December 11, 2025 WEATHER
0 0 0 Derrick Ave
Prepared For:

36.7553
-120.3867 Clear
Turning Movement Report
Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612
|

Page 2 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
/ Smoot Ave
Clear
One-way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

N/A
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
LOCATION Derrick Ave / Derrick Ave
COUNTY

COLLECTION DATE

CYCLE TIME
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com
Smoot Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno Thursday, December 11, 2025 N/A
H
Turning Movement Report

NIS STREET

EIW STREET

WEATHER

CONTROL TYPE

COMMENTS
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612
Derrick Ave / Derrick Ave
/ Smoot Ave Clear One-way Stop

Page 3 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 4 0 0 13 2 1 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 2 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 9 4 4 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 1 0 0 3 15 0 4 0 0 5 10 2 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 10 13 3 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 6 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 10 1 6 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 2 2 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 6 0 0 3 61 0 11 0 0 74 38 20
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 3 0 0 2 24 0 0 0 0 11 23 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 2 23 0 2 0 0 10 21 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 0 0 1 19 0 2 0 0 9 12 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 3 27 0 4 0 0 14 15 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 15 0 0 0 0 6 11 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 7 13 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 1 17 0 1 0 0 13 19 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 23 0 1 0 0 8 11 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 7 0 0 13 162 0 10 0 0 78 125 2
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 4 0 0 3 39 0 5 0 0 35 27 10 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 6 0 0 8 93 0 8 0 0 44 71 2 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.541 7.5% PM 6 0 50 0 0.875
PM 0.895 3.7% AM 4 0 91 0 0.403
PHF 0.842 0.583
AM PM
0 0 27 71
8 3 35 44
93 39 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.674 0.846 PHF
##### 0 0 0 0 AM
##### 0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Peach Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7493
-120.3896

Page 1 of 3 ends

Belmont Ave
Northbound Westbound
Belmont Ave
Peach Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

LOCATION

COUNTY COLLECTION DATE
imt 7m0AM-7fl5AM
7fl5AM-730AM
730AM-7M5AM
7M5AM-8m0AM
BmOAM-SHSAM
8fl5AM-830AM
830AM-8M5AM
8M5AM-9mOAM
TOTAL
fime
4m0PM-4n5PM
4fl5PM-430PM
430FM-4M5PM
4M5PM-5mOPM
5m0PM-5n5PM
5fl5PM-530PM
530FM-5M5PM
5m5PM-6m0PM
TOTAL

PEAK HOUR
7:15 -
CI OOCD<DOCDCDOO_l 000000000 _| 0.541

0.895 OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO O O 7.5%3.7%
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com Belmont Ave @ Peach Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 000000000 000000000 000000000 OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO 600000000 '0 1 Belmont Ave 000000000 01 600000000 —\ oo
0 91
0 50
2 0.583
0 0
8 3 93 39 O 0 PM AM 000000000 600000000

LATITUDE

LONGITUDE WEATHER
1 0 0 O 0 0
2 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0
6 0 0
3 0 0 O 0 0
2 0 0
1 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0
1 0 0 O 0 0
7 0 0
4 0 0
6 0 0
Peach Ave
6 0 50
4 0 91
Noflh
Turning Movement Report
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis, CA 93612

36.7493
-120.3896 Clear
0 8 0 4 O O 13 2 1
0 5 0 O O O 11 O 1
0 12 0 1 O O 9 4 4 3 15 0 4 O 0 5 10 2
0 7 0 O O O 10 13 3
0 1 0 O O O 8 6 1
0 8 0 2 O O 10 1 6 0 5 0 O O 0 8 2 2
3 61 0 11 0 0 74 38 20
2 24 0 O O 0 11 23 0 2 23 0 2 O 0 10 21 0 1 19 0 2 O O 9 12 1 3 27 0 4 O 0 14 15 1
3 15 0 O O O 6 11 0 0 14 0 O O O 7 13 0
1 17 0 1 O O 13 19 0 1 23 0 1 O O 8 11 0 13 162 0 10 0 0 78 125 2 3 39 0 5 0 0 35 27 10
EL
-O.403|
0 AM PM t.| 27 71
{lll|35 44
r|0 0 BelmontAve
0 0 06M fig
0 AM
0 PM

Page 1 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 0 2 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Peach Ave
Belmont Ave Belmont Ave
0

Page 2 of 3 ends

Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Peach Ave 36.7493
Fresno -120.3896
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax

COLLECTION DATE
7 Time
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM
TOTAL
fime 4m0PM-4H5PM
4H5PM-430PM
430FM-4M5PM
4m5PM-5m0PM
5m0PM-5H5PM
5fl5PM-530PM
530FM-5M5PM
5m5PM-6m0PM
TOTAL

PEAK HOUR
7:1 - 8:15
4 _
T
Peak T
www.metrotrafficdata.com
LOCATION Belmont Ave @ Peach Ave LATITUDE COUNTY Fresno LONGITUDE Thursday, December 11, 2025 WEATHER
Turning Movement Report
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612

36.7493
-120.3896 Clear 600000000 600000000 Belmont Ave
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Peach Ave
Peds <> | o | PM o o o l
| 2 I AM o o o o
A _ _ V o 0) A h E V|r AM
001-1 1.0
o 0‘ ® _0
Nonh
o 0
PM AM '1‘ I Peds<> 0
0 E g 0 AM
0 0 0 PM
0 r;
r 600000000 600000000 600000000 600000000 OOOOOOOOO 600000000 600000000 600000000 600000000 000000000 0 Belmont Ave Peds<>

Page 2 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Peach Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Peach Ave /
Belmont Ave / Belmont Ave
Clear
One-way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

LOCATION
COUNTY

COLLECTION DATE

CYCLE TIME
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Peach Ave NIS STREET
Fresno EIW STREET
Thursday, December 11, 2025 WEATHER

N/A CONTROL TYPE

COMMENTS
dOlS
Noflh
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612
Peach Ave / Belmont Ave / Belmont Ave Clear One-way Stop

Page 3 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 9 2 3 0 17 12 7 3 0 3 8 1 5 0 1 10 18 4 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 1 9 1 2 0 18 13 5 1 0 2 6 3 0 0 2 7 8 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 6 0 2 0 76 9 5 4 0 5 28 0 1 0 3 13 40 8 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 1 9 10 0 0 121 8 5 4 0 10 62 3 3 0 0 12 46 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 1 4 2 0 0 28 22 6 4 0 2 9 1 0 0 5 19 49 8 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 3 9 2 3 0 10 12 4 4 0 2 3 0 0 0 2 8 15 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 1 9 0 0 0 11 10 4 1 0 4 6 0 2 0 6 9 11 7 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 1 8 2 1 0 16 8 4 3 0 6 4 2 1 0 2 6 24 3 TOTAL 0 8 63 19 11 0 297 94 40 24 0 34 126 10 12 0 21 84 211 35 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 4 57 23 8 0 44 17 15 3 0 19 25 2 0 0 6 25 32 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 4 32 20 3 0 30 19 11 3 0 20 22 2 2 0 3 20 29 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 30 9 4 0 35 14 10 3 0 17 25 4 2 0 5 17 42 3 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 1 35 13 1 0 41 15 16 1 0 15 25 1 3 0 5 16 23 4 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 26 10 4 0 20 18 5 1 0 24 17 1 2 0 14 14 20 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 5 31 4 4 0 36 19 2 1 0 8 12 3 0 0 6 7 11 2 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 1 18 14 9 0 31 15 11 1 0 18 16 1 0 0 6 11 22 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 2 25 5 3 0 23 13 11 2 0 13 13 0 3 0 2 6 11 0 TOTAL 0 17 254 98 36 0 260 130 81 15 0 134 155 14 12 0 47 116 190 11 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 3 28 13 4 0 243 52 21 13 0 19 105 7 4 0 10 51 143 21 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 9 154 65 16 0 150 65 52 10 0 71 97 9 7 0 19 78 126 7 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.605 6.0% PM 52 65 150 0 0.878
PM 0.832 4.5% AM 21 52 243 0 0.59
PHF 0.962 0.437
AM PM
0 0 143 126
71 19 51 78
97 105 10 19
9 7 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.699 0.871 PHF

0.55 0 3 28 13 AM

0.679 0 9 154 65 PM
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7493
-120.3868

Page 1 of 3 ends

Belmont Ave
Northbound Westbound
Belmont Ave
Derrick Ave
Derrick Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

COLLECTION DATE
imt 7m0AM-7fl5AM
7fl5AM-730AM
730AM-7M5AM
7M5AM-8m0AM
BmOAM-SHSAM
8fl5AM-830AM
830AM-8M5AM
8M5AM-9mOAM
TOTAL
fime
4m0PM-4n5PM
4fl5PM-430PM
430FM-4M5PM
4M5PM-5mOPM
5m0PM-5n5PM
5fl5PM-530PM
530FM-5M5PM
5m5PM-6m0PM
TOTAL

PEAK HOUR
7:15 -

LOCATION
COUNTY _| 000000000 ‘F_| 000000000 0.605

0.832 “AAQDAAOAO N—‘U‘lO—‘O-b-b —\ N (O

6.0%

4.5%
Metro Traffic Data Inc. TU rn i ng Movement Report 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612 Belmont Ave @ Derrick Ave LATITUDE 36.7493 Fresno LONGITUDE -120.3868 Thursday, December 11, 2025 WEATHER Clear 9 2 3 0 17 12 7 3 0 3 8 1 5 O 1 1O 18 4
9 1 2 0 18 13 5 1 0 2 6 3 O O 2 7 8 1
6 0 2 O 76 9 5 4 0 5 28 0 1 O 3 13 40 8
9 10 0 O 121 8 5 4 0 10 62 3 3 O 0 12 46 4
4 2 O O 28 22 6 4 0 2 9 1 O O 5 19 49 8
9 2 3 0 1O 12 4 4 0 2 3 0 0 0 2 8 15 0
9 0 0 0 11 1O 4 1 0 4 6 0 2 O 6 9 11 7
8 2 1 O 16 8 4 3 0 6 4 2 1 O 2 6 24 3
63 19 11 0 297 94 40 24 0 34 126 10 12 0 21 84 211 35
57 23 8 O 44 17 15 3 0 19 25 2 O O 6 25 32 0 32 20 3 0 3O 19 11 3 0 20 22 2 2 O 3 20 29 0 30 9 4 O 35 14 1O 3 0 17 25 4 2 O 5 17 42 3 35 13 1 O 41 15 16 1 0 15 25 1 3 O 5 16 23 4
26 10 4 O 20 18 5 1 0 24 17 1 2 O 14 14 20 1
31 4 4 O 36 19 2 1 0 8 12 3 O O 6 7 11 2
18 14 9 O 31 15 11 1 0 18 16 1 O O 6 11 22 1
25 5 3 0 23 13 11 2 0 13 13 0 3 O 2 6 11 0 254 98 36 0 260 130 81 15 0 134 155 14 12 0 47 116 190 11 28 13 4 0 243 52 21 13 0 19 105 7 4 0 10 51 143 21
154 65 16 0 150 65 52 10 0 71 97 9 7 0 19 78 126 7
Derrick Ave PHF PM 52 65 150 0 AM 21 52 243 0 0.59 P F 0.437 AM PM o o p L 143 126
71 19 P _ 51 78
BelmontAve 97 105P North r 10 19 BelmontAve
9 7 h c o 0
PM AM 0.699 PHF P_HF
28 13 AM
o 9 154 65 PM
DerrickAve

Page 1 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 1 8 PM 0 0 0 21
PM Peak Total 0 29 AM 0 0 0 2 Peds <>
0 3
AM PM
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 8
Peds <>
3 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Derrick Ave
Belmont Ave Belmont Ave
Derrick Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Derrick Ave 36.7493
Fresno -120.3868
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax

COLLECTION DATE
7 Time
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM
TOTAL
fime 4m0PM-4H5PM
4H5PM-430PM
430FM-4M5PM
4m5PM-5m0PM
5m0PM-5H5PM
5fl5PM-530PM
530FM-5M5PM
5m5PM-6m0PM
TOTAL

PEAK HOUR
7:1 - 8:15
4 _
T
Peak T
www.metrotrafficdata.com
LOCATION Belmont Ave @ Derrick Ave LATITUDE COUNTY Fresno LONGITUDE Thursday, December 11, 2025 WEATHER
Turning Movement Report
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612

36.7493
-120.3868 Clear 600000000 600000000
Belmont Ave
Peds <> NOOOOOAAO COCO—\O‘IOOV N_\
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 3 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Derrick Ave
Peds <> PM 0 0 0
AM 0 0 0 2 |
3 AM
1 I‘d L 0
0 ‘ ® _ o
Nonh ° l'l '1- °
AM
o Peds <> I 3 | 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 PM
Derrick Ave 600000000 600000000 600000000 600000000 WOOOONAOO “0000000100 600000000 600000000 600000000 AAOOOOOOO 0 0 0 0 3
8 0 0 0 0
PM
0 0 Belmont Ave
0 A
V
(I)
'0
d) L

Page 2 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 110 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Derrick Ave / Derrick Ave
Belmont Ave / Belmont Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

LOCATION
COUNTY

COLLECTION DATE

CYCLE TIME
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com
Belmont Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno Thursday, December 11, 2025 1 10 Seconds
Turning Movement Report
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612
NIS STREET DerrickAve/ DerrickAve
EIW STREET BelmontAve/ BelmontAve
WEATHER Clear CONTROL TYPE Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protectedleftturns.

L
h
#—
Noflh

Page 3 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 26 32 0 4 0 0 49 1 4 0 6 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 27 51 0 10 0 1 46 7 5 0 6 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 35 68 0 12 0 0 45 29 6 0 13 1 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 68 70 2 10 0 1 44 57 3 0 32 0 17 1 0 0 1 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 23 30 0 5 1 3 61 14 5 0 36 0 20 2 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 11 33 0 4 0 0 46 5 6 0 2 1 16 1 0 1 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 13 35 0 9 0 0 35 3 3 0 5 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 14 39 0 6 0 0 42 2 5 0 2 1 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 0 217 358 2 60 1 5 368 118 37 0 102 3 112 13 0 1 1 1 1 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 25 80 0 1 0 1 56 12 5 0 27 0 40 3 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 31 93 1 5 0 0 67 14 3 0 17 0 22 1 0 0 0 1 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 31 85 1 7 0 1 78 11 4 0 15 0 38 3 0 1 0 1 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 21 89 0 5 0 1 59 9 1 0 9 0 37 5 0 0 1 2 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 16 64 0 3 0 1 58 10 2 0 16 0 34 2 0 0 0 1 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 25 71 0 1 0 1 48 7 2 0 10 0 21 0 0 0 0 1 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 21 56 0 0 0 0 55 12 1 0 18 0 27 5 0 0 1 4 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 18 51 0 0 0 0 41 6 3 0 17 1 18 4 0 1 0 2 0 TOTAL 0 188 589 2 22 0 5 462 81 21 0 129 1 237 23 0 2 2 12 5 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 153 219 2 37 1 5 196 107 19 0 87 1 65 7 0 0 1 0 0 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 108 347 2 18 0 3 260 46 13 0 68 0 137 12 0 1 1 4 3 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.717 7.5% PM 46 260 3 0 0.858
PM 0.932 4.7% AM 107 196 5 1 0.757
PHF 0.765 0.683
AM PM
0 0 0 4
68 87 1 1
0 1 0 1
137 65 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.25 0.5 PHF

0.668 0 153 219 2 AM

0.914 0 108 347 2 PM
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ SR 180
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7493
-120.3733

Page 1 of 3 ends

Driveway
Northbound Westbound
Belmont Ave
Oller St
San Benito Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc. TU rn i ng Movement Report 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 . I Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For: ' ' ' ' Peters Engineering Group 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612 LOCATION Belmont Ave @ SR 180 LATITUDE 36.7493 COUNTY Fresno LONGITUDE -120.3733 COLLECTION DATE Thursday, December 11, 2025 WEATHER Clear imt 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 26 32 0 4 0 0 49 1 4 0 6 0 14 2 O O O 0 0 7:15AM -7:30 AM 0 27 51 0 1O 0 1 46 5 0 6 0 13 1 O O O 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 35 68 0 12 0 O 45 29 6 0 13 1 15 3 O O O 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 68 70 2 10 0 1 44 57 3 0 32 0 17 1 O O 1 0 0 8:00AM -8:15 AM 0 23 30 0 5 1 3 61 14 5 0 36 0 20 2 O O O 0 0 8:15AM -8:30 AM 0 11 33 0 4 O O 46 5 6 0 2 1 16 1 O 1 O 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 13 35 0 9 0 0 35 3 3 0 5 0 9 3 O O O 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 14 39 0 6 0 0 42 2 5 0 2 1 8 O O O O 1 1 TOTAL 0 217 358 2 60 1 5 368 118 37 0 102 3 112 13 0 1 1 1 1 Time _ 4:00PM- 4:15PM o 25 80 o 1 o 1 56 12 5 o 27 0 4o 3 o o o o o 4:15PM- 4:30PM o 31 93 1 5 o o 67 14 3 o 17 o 22 1 o o o 1 o 4:30PM- 4:45PM o 31 85 1 7 o 1 78 11 4 o 15 o 38 3 o 1 o 1 1 4:45PM- 5:00PM o 21 89 o 5 o 1 59 9 1 o 9 o 37 5 o o 1 2 2 5:00PM- 5:15PM o 16 64 o 3 o 1 58 1o 2 o 16 o 34 2 o o o 1 o 5:15PM- 5:30PM o 25 71 o 1 o 1 48 7 2 o 10 o 21 o o o o 1 1 5:30PM- 5:45PM o 21 56 o o o o 55 12 1 o 18 o 27 5 o o 1 4 1 5:45PM- 6:00PM o 18 51 o o o o 41 6 3 o 17 1 18 4 o 1 o 2 0 TOTAL 0 188 589 2 22 o 5 462 81 21 o 129 1 237 23 o 2 2 12 5 l— PEAKHOUR —
7:15 - o 153 219 2 37 1 5 196 107 19 o 87 1 65 7 o o 1 o o o 108 347 2 18 o 3 260 46 13 o 68 o 137 12 o 1 1 4 3
Oller St PHF

0.717 7.5% PM 46 260 3 0 .

0.932 4.7% AM 107 196 5 1 0.757 ;
Belmont Ave 0 1 P North r| 0 1 Driveway

PM AM I
q r 0.25 E
E fl___

0.668 0 153 219 2 AM
0 108 347 2 PM
San Benito Ave

Page 1 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 10 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
10 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Oller St
Belmont Ave Driveway
San Benito Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ SR 180 36.7493
Fresno -120.3733
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax

COLLECTION DATE
7 Time
7:00 AM - 7:15 AM
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM
TOTAL
fime 4m0PM-4H5PM
4H5PM-430PM
430FM-4M5PM
4m5PM-5m0PM
5m0PM-5H5PM
5fl5PM-530PM
530FM-5M5PM
5m5PM-6m0PM
TOTAL

PEAK HOUR
7:1 - 8:15
4 _
T
Peak T

LOCATION
COUNTY
www.metrotrafficdata.com
Belmont Ave @ SR 180
Fresno Thursday, December 11, 2025
Turning Movement Report

LATITUDE

LONGITUDE

WEATHER
Prepared For:

36.7493
-120.3733 Clear
Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612 600000000 600000000
Belmont Ave
Peds <> 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
PM
AM
0 0 OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
o o
0 0 0
0 0 0
Oller St
0 0 0
0 0 0
San Benito Ave OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO Peds <> OOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOO AM OO‘IO‘IONOOO
AN AOOO—‘OOOO 10 Peds<> 600000000 600000000 600000000 600000000 Driveway 600000000 600000000 OOOOOOOOO 000000000

Page 2 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ SR 180
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Oller St / San Benito Ave
Driveway / Belmont Ave
Clear
One-way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

LOCATION
COUNTY

COLLECTION DATE

CYCLE TIME
Metro Traffic Data Inc. 310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20 Hanford, CA 93230 800-975-6938 Phone/Fax www.metrotrafficdata.com
Belmont Ave @ SR 180
Fresno Thursday, December 11, 2025 N/A
Turning Movement Report

NIS STREET

EIW STREET

WEATHER

CONTROL TYPE

COMMENTS
Prepared For: Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Ave Clovis,CA 93612
Oller St / San Benito Ave Driveway / Belmont Ave Clear One-way Stop

Page 3 of 3 ends

TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX C

FRESNO COUNTY TRAVEL MODEL
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX C

FRESNO COUNTY TRAVEL MODEL

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Licensed to Peters Engineering
AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
2024 Fresno County Travel Model
310
64 106
249
184
156
122
169
3 7
5 2
8 8
51 14
3 4
0 8
1 3
8 6
1 2
4 3
212
35 7
1 2
71 4
4 0
9 48
39 94
111
118
86 102
188
173
136
28 51
50 47
7 24
21 14
103
19 42
101 2
3 6
4 84
116
165
130
4 1
1 3
81 164
173
119
0 0
0 0
9 12
15 15
8 19
23 14
0 0
0 0
191
43 70
159
19 0
0 0
0 5
3 7
51 80
51 438
350
80 SR 33
SR 33 70
345
301
103
87 96
78 639
245
205
SR 33
SR 33
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
29 312
250
323
354
SR 180
SR 180
299
332
432
345
299
332
432
345
312
250
323
35 62
4 189
249
96 9TH
9TH
389
417
486
440
SR 180
SR 180
38 41
4 7
44 S
0 SR 180
367
127
349
728
593
464
728
349
464
593
71 370
318
99 Belmont
Belmont
70 345
301
103
51 438
350
80 SR 33
SR 33
51 438
350
80 87
96 87
170
167
96 87
170
167
96 Belmont
Belmont
78 0
0 0
0 S
moot
S
moot
78 639
245
205
29 545
127
166
SR 33
SR 33
361
349
336
593
0 0
0 0
2ND
2ND
361
349
336
593
284
359
322
542
88 178
178
100
88 178
178
100
284
359
322
542
101
60 317
10 7TH
7TH
284
359
322
542
312
250
323
354
62 96
62 96
347
409
431
380
SR 33
SR 33
0 0
0 0
S
moot
S
moot
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
87 170
167
96 Belmont
Belmont
389
418
486
440
SR 180
SR 180
101
60 317
10 7TH
7TH
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
7 24
21 14
Marie
Marie
7 24
21 14
Marie
Marie
62 189
249
96 9TH
9TH
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
62 96
18 52
113
29 18
52 113
29 Airport
Airport
55 20
32 119
Inez
Inez
55 20
32 0
0 0
0 Marie
Marie
75 517
340
159
Bass
Bass
24 7
14 21
7 24
21 14
Marie
Marie
24 7
14 21
68 472
300
138
Bass
Bass
24 7
14 21
23 7
13 20
2ND
2ND
24 76
57 23
7 13
20 18
160
59 46
Inez
Inez
18 59
46 55
20 32
119
Inez
Inez
55 20
32 119
Inez
Inez
55 2
3 0
2 55
2 3
0 2
119
71 370
318
99 0
0 0
0 Belmont
Belmont
71 370
318
99 Belmont
Belmont
0 0
0 0
Amador
Amador
@UDED® Belmont 99 370 71 318 Belmont 70%03; a? 9 6‘Y9?) ’90)} Bass 0" 159 -h \l 00 U1 0 N -|> LO h 00 CO 00 V 00 ’3 CO ‘831,993 [\N 0 N co 0 4) \— OO \ 7 Sex {9 0°)0:) ‘3.) t’ 29%? '<T: oo/Q @6,. 5‘ 5‘ 0 ’0
Q Q
Belmont I, ,\ (”Jug«’8‘ Belmont 99 99 103103«6&6? «‘5 96 370 Av.» 370 /345345 b?‘23I70 170 170 71 «2 71 70 0'50 97087 ‘_ 87 «V87 o 318 /9318 301923? L03 167 167 ‘167 178 178 ‘5, 0 Belmont «6 g 5 Belmont Belmont 6‘ ‘83 Q ’9‘ \ or) or) m o / V ’9 6‘ X9 00 oo ‘_ o or) 7c? 77 \6‘ / n: (I) 00 2 Lo 5‘3 a) 0: 0 “963 Q?0 6‘ 76, & 4’70‘90 0') 0') ooo oo ‘_ o oo %00or) LO vmmg
0 0o
m 0 ’71) 2024 Fresno County Travel Model AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes Licensed to Peters Engineering Licensed to Peters Engineering
AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
2046 Fresno County Travel Model
402
72 142
334
180
142
146
188
3 6
3 2
6 4
3 5
0 15
7 21
13 17
39 26
155
132
45 55
12 2
4 8
1 4
7 1
6 74
54 94
109
140
92 108
223
206
153
33 48
52 50
11 39
37 17
82 18
31 69 2
4 11
3 91
134
172
125
3 1
2 3
91 170
182
124
0 0
0 0
8 10
10 12
6 18
23 17
0 0
0 0
206
41 71
176
19 0
0 0
0 6
3 6
49 83
49 437
369
83 SR 33
SR 33
99 71
350
301
117
94 74
593
287
221
SR 33
SR 33
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
28 416
277
369
436
SR 180
SR 180
441
362
430
480
441
362
430
480
416
277
369
43 46
6 150
131
68 9TH
9TH
498
430
518
541
SR 180
SR 180
49 43
5 0
54 S
1 SR 180
303
129
315
547
398
425
547
315
425
398
70 375
317
113
Belmont
Belmont
71 350
301
117
49 437
369
83 SR 33
SR 33
49 437
369
83 94 94
155
160
119
94 155
160
119
Belmont
Belmont
74 0
0 0
0 S
moot
S
moot
74 593
287
221
28 495
144
168
SR 33
SR 33
608
391
428
839
95 384
462
152
2ND
2ND
608
391
428
839
481
379
391
749
92 163
167
123
92 163
167
123
481
379
391
749
98 121
331
23 7TH
7TH
481
379
391
749
416
277
369
436
46 68
46 68
382
420
458
427
SR 33
SR 33
0 0
0 0
S
moot
S
moot
0 0
0 0
S
moot
S
moot
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
94 155
160
119
Belmont
Belmont
498
430
518
541
SR 180
SR 180
98 121
331
23 7TH
7TH
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
11 39
37 17
Marie
Marie
11 39
37 17
Marie
Marie
46 150
131
68 9TH
9TH
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
46 68
8 3
1 6
1 8
3 1
6 1
Airport
Airport
12 6
9 21
Inez
Inez
12 6
9 21
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
17 287
80 75
Bass
Bass
95 384
462
152
2ND
2ND
90 11
39 37
17 Marie
Marie
90 16
261
79 67
Bass
Bass
90 5
1 5
77 265
85 2ND
2ND
55 85
14 51
37 36
Inez
Inez
14 51
37 36
12 6
9 21
Inez
Inez
12 6
9 21
Inez
Inez
12 6
9 21
12 6
9 21
70 375
317
113
0 0
1 1
Belmont
Belmont
70 375
317
113
Belmont
Belmont
0 0
0 0
Amador
Amador
m.
2%
2%
b
so
aa
Q o
waxwe
v Qgmama \ av
6 e; Vb
/mAozauzauo
@A.
/
V
94 Mmmmm mm mm
8m mmm
mowav av
0 ‘5‘ Eu
w
mm mm
1 & /
e%&% B
an
W @A: 1 3
3 0 oo \ w r\ A”) 113 375 70 317 Belmont Belmont Belmont 113 375 70 317 Belmont 2046 Fresno County Travel Model AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes @UDED® Licensed to Peters Engineering TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX D

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEETS
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX D

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEETS

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Operational Analyses
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT
Operational Analyses

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:57:18 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

SITE LAYOUT
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:57:18 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 568 5.0 1012 0.562 100 7.0 LOS A 4.5 116.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 568 5.0 0.562 7.0 LOS A 4.5 116.3
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 4 5.0 557 0.007 100 8.8 LOS A 0.0 1.1 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.007 8.8 LOS A 0.0 1.1
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 945 5.0 1305 0.724 100 5.5 LOS A 9.0 234.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 945 5.0 0.724 5.5 LOS A 9.0 234.8
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 207 5.0 754 0.274 100 13.0 LOS B 1.7 43.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 207 5.0 0.274 13.0 LOS B 1.7 43.0
Intersection 1724 5.0 0.724 6.9 LOS A 9.0 234.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 76 491 1 568 5.0 1012 0.562 100 NA NA
Approach 76 491 1 568 5.0 0.562
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 4 5.0 557 0.007 100 NA NA

LANE SUMMARY
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1OI 568 5.0 1012 0.562 100 7.0 LOS A 4.5 116.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 568 5.0 0.562 7.0 LOS A 4.5 116.3
NorthEast: Private Dr (
Lane 1OI 4 5.0 557 0.007 100 8.8 LOS A 0.0 1.1 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.007 8.8 LOS A 0.0 1.1
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33) (‘
Lane 1OI 945 5.0 1305 0.724 100 5.5 LOS A 9.0 234.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 945 5.0 0.724 5.5 LOS A 9.0 234.8
SouthWest:DerrickAve(SR33) (‘
Lane 1OI 207 5.0 754 0.274 100 13.0 LOS B 1.7 43.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 207 5.0 0.274 13.0 LOS B 1.7 43.0
Intersection 1724 5.0 0.724 6.9 LOS A 9.0 234.8 B
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and WCratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (Wenot used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach —SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180) Lane1 76 491 1 568 5.0 1012 0.562 100 NA NA |
Approach 76 491 1 568 5.0 0.562
NorthEast: Private Dr
|Lane1 1 1 1 4 5.0 557 0.007 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.007
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 62 1 455 426 945 5.0 1305 0.724 100 NA NA
Approach 62 1 455 426 945 5.0 0.724
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 754 0.274 100 NA NA
Approach 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 0.274
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1724 5.0 0.724
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:14 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.007 I
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 62 1 455 426 945 5.0 13050.724 100 NA NA I
Approach 62 1 455 426 945 5.0 0.724 I
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 754 0.274 100 NA NA
Approach 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 0.274
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1724 5.0 0.724
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied %
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:14 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing-AM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.5
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 10 4 24 35 124 3 30 15 138 38 12
Future Vol, veh/h 6 10 4 24 35 124 3 30 15 138 38 12
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 8 13 5 32 47 165 4 40 20 184 51 16
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.2 9.3 8.2 10.2

HCM LOSA A A B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 6% 30% 13% 73%
Vol Thru, % 63% 50% 19% 20%
Vol Right, % 31% 20% 68% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 48 20 183 188
LT Vol 3 6 24 138
Through Vol 30 10 35 38
RT Vol 15 4 124 12
Lane Flow Rate 64 27 244 251
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.084 0.037 0.299 0.333
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.738 4.985 4.407 4.788
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 753 715 815 749
Service Time 2.79 3.035 2.439 2.829
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.085 0.038 0.299 0.335
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.2 8.2 9.3 10.2
HCM Lane LOS AAAB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.1 1.3 1.5
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing-AM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 9.5
‘rsectionLOS A ‘ —LaneConfigurations
Efrc Vol veh/h ‘1 6 10 4 24 35 124 3 30 15 138 38- FutureVol,veh/h 6 1O 4 24 35 124 3 30 15 138 38 12 lk HourFactor ———- HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 [mt Flow Wfl2'47—165'4 40— 20:184—51-
Number of Lanes 0 1 O O 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 —OpposingApproach WB EB SB NB lbposingLanes 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - ConflictingApproachLeft SB NB EB WB InflictingLanesLeft — ConflictingApproachRight NB SB WB EB IflictingLanesRight .— HCMControlDelay,s/veh 8.2 9.3 8.2 10.2 lfLOS m —VolLeft,% 6% 30% 13% 73%
'I'hru,% - 63% 50% 19% 20% — VolRight,% 31% 20% 68% 6%
.Control _p Stop Stop St—
TrafficVolby Lane 20 183 188
m —6; 24 18—
ThroughVol 35
.ol —0 4' 248—
LaneFlowRate 64 27 244 ImetryGrp —: 1- 1 2—
reeofUtil(X) 0.084 0.037 0.299 0.333
Max—38 4-985 4-407 4-7—
Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
—753 715 815 74—
ServiceTime 2.79 3.035 2.439 2.829
m LaneVICRafi—L 00380299 0-3
HCMControlDelay,s/veh 8.2 9.3 10.2
HCM95th-tileQ 0.3 0.1 1.3 1.5
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 111 146 181 320 32
Future Vol, veh/h 28 111 146 181 320 32
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 35 35 35 0 0 35
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 37 148 195 241 427 43
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1127 497 504 0 - 0
Stage 1 462 -----
Stage 2 666 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 223 567 1045 - - -
Stage 1 628 -----
Stage 2 505 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 168 530 1010 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 168 -----
Stage 1 490 -----
Stage 2 489 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.02 4.2 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1010 - 168 530 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.193 - 0.222 0.279 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.4 - 32.4 14.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 0.8 1.1 - -
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 4.7
LaneConfigurations‘l'i i‘If ‘lfi 1|- + if
'6fficV0Lveh/h28 111 146181320 32 — FutureVol,veh/h 28 111 146 181 320 32 InflictingPeds.#/hr 35 35 35 0 0 — SignControl Stop Stop Free Free Free Free IChannelized aflon_
StorageLength 590 O O - - O
m inMedianStorage_
Grade,% O - - 0 O - ‘Hour Facto: — HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 IWFIOW W 148 '195‘241 427 _
ConflictingFlow All 1127 497 504 O - 0
I Stage1 462 — - - — StageZ 666 - - - - - [cal Hdwy 6.4.?6.2— CriticalHdwyStg1 5.45 - - - - _
lcaIHdWStgz 5-45 -— Follow-upHdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - - ICap-1Maneuver 23.56— Stage1 628 - - - - - I Stage2 50—
Platoonblocked,% - _ _
.Cap-1Maneuver
MovCap-2Maneuver 168 - — - - _
'Stage 1 _
Stage2 489 - - - - -
CtrlDly,S/V 18.02 4.2 0

HCMLOS C
I
lapacity(veh/h) 1010 - 168530 - -
HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.193 - 0.222 0.279 - - KM Ct” D'Y(SN) _.__9-4 ' 32-4 144— HCMLaneLOS A - D B - -
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-AM
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 19 105 7 10 51 143 3 28 13 243 52 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 19 105 7 10 51 143 3 28 13 243 52 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 150 9 14 73 161 4 40 13 347 74 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 55 677 40 31 330 285 9 257 203 435 704 583
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.14 0.14 0.25 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 3288 195 1725 1721 1484 1725 1811 1432 1725 1811 1500 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 78 81 14 73 161 4 40 13 347 74 10 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1763 1725 1721 1484 1725 1811 1432 1725 1811 1500 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 1.8 1.8 0.4 1.7 4.6 0.1 0.9 0.4 8.8 1.2 0.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 1.8 1.8 0.4 1.7 4.6 0.1 0.9 0.4 8.8 1.2 0.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 55 354 363 31 330 285 9 257 203 435 704 583 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.22 0.22 0.46 0.22 0.56 0.43 0.16 0.06 0.80 0.11 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 296 780 799 259 743 641 259 860 680 1556 2222 1841 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.2 15.4 15.4 22.6 15.9 17.0 23.1 17.5 17.3 16.3 9.1 8.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.8 0.3 0.3 10.2 0.3 1.8 28.1 0.3 0.1 3.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.6 1.5 0.1 0.4 0.1 3.4 0.4 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 28.9 15.7 15.7 32.9 16.2 18.8 51.2 17.8 17.4 19.7 9.1 8.8 LnGrp LOS CBBCBBDBBBAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 186 248 57 431
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.6 18.8 20.1 17.6
Approach LOS B B C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 11.5 4.8 14.5 4.3 23.0 5.5 13.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 42.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 7.0 57.1 8.0 20.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.8 2.9 2.4 3.8 2.1 3.2 2.7 6.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.1
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-AM
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tr‘wvi J
Lane —Configurations ‘1 +12) ‘1 +11). 1''i + F ‘1 + F
Effie Volume(veh/h) 19 105 7 1O 51 143 3 28 13 243 52
FutureVolume(veh/h) 19 105 7 10 51 143 3 28 13 243 52 21 lial Q(Qb),veh O 0 _ 0 0 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) . . . . ' .93 .00
ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 10.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No' No ‘ No a ‘ AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 [FlowRate,veh/h _150‘ -14. 73; 161- 4‘ 403 13.347; 74-
PeakHourFactor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 [cent HeavyVeh,-6 6: 6t 6Z 6 6I 6‘ 6 6 6 6-
Cap,veh/h 55 677 40 31 330 285 9 257 203 435 704 583
live OnGreen .‘.03 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.14 0.14 0.25 0.39 gt Flow,veh/h 1725 3288 195 1725 1721 1484 1725 1811 1432 1725 1811 1500 lo Volume(v),veh/h"" ‘- 27 78 81 14 73 161 4 4O 13 347 74 GrpSatFIow(s),veh/h/In 1725 1721 1763 1725 1721 1484 1725 1811 1432 1725 1811 1500 [Serve(g_s),s U] 1.8 1.8 0.4 1.7 4.6 0.1 0.9 0.4 8.8 1.2- CycleQClear(g_c),s 0.7 1.8 1.8 0.4 1.7 4.6 0.1 0.9 0.4 8.8 1.2 0.2 [p InLane m ;O.11 1.00‘ _1.00 _ 1.00‘ 1.00 1.00
LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 55 354 363 31 330 285 9 257 203 435 704 583 E Ratio(X) .-9 0.22 0.22 0.46: 0.22 0.56 0.43 _ 0.16 0.06 0.80 0.11 AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 296 780 799 259 743 641 259 860 680 1556 2222 1841 [M PlatoonRatio .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 liform Delay (d),s/veh ‘2 15.4 _15.4 22.6 15.9 _17.0__23.1_.175-17.3”163 9.1- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 6.8 10.2 28.1 0.3 0.1 3.4- 0.0
lial Q
Delay(d3),s/veh ._o 0-§.0- 0.0- 0.0 0-
.0.
0-0.0 0.0m.mP:'-1
%i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.4 0..7 .5
lsig MovementDelay,s/vehfl‘0 6‘ A201 6‘ A AA-..-
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 28.9 15.7 15.7 32.9 16.2 18.8 51.2 17.8 17.4 19.7 9.1 lGrpLOS _-—'8
ApproachVol,veh/h 7 186 248 57 431
EproachDelay,s/veh‘ 17.6 — —.18 8— ‘— 20.1 17.

ApproachLOS B B C B
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 15.7 11.5 4.8 14.5 4.3 23.0 5.5 13.8 IIange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 42.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 7.0 57.1 8.0 20.1 mCIearTime(g_c+I1),s10.8 2.9 24*33— 2.1 3.2 2.7 6_
GreenExtTime(p_c), s 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.1
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 18.1
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-AM
Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 160 14 277 4 40 19 347 74 30
v/c Ratio 0.12 0.23 0.06 0.42 0.02 0.16 0.06 0.63 0.08 0.04 Control Delay (s/veh) 26.5 19.6 26.9 10.2 27.3 25.7 0.3 21.2 9.3 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 26.5 19.6 26.9 10.2 27.3 25.7 0.3 21.2 9.3 0.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 19 3 8 1 10 0 71 7 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 46 18 27 8 34 0 149 35 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1243 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 292 1523 255 1387 255 848 752 1435 1696 1401 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.11 0.05 0.20 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.24 0.04 0.02 Intersection Summary
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-AM
Queues 02/12/2026
f—rr*—*\ TIN»; J
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 27 160 14 277 4 4O 19 347 74 30
'Ratio 0.12 0.23 0.06 0.42 0.02 0.16 0.06 0.63 0.08 0.04 _ ControlDelay(s/veh) 26.5 19.6 26.9 10.2 27.3 25.7 0.3 21.2 9.3 0.1 [we Delay '2'; 0.0 _ 0.0i 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.

TotalDelay(s/veh) 26.5 19.6 26.9 10.2 27.3 25.7 0.3 21.2 9.3 0.1 leue Length50th(ft) 19‘
QueueLength95th(ft) 27 46 18 27 8 34 0 149 35 O
lernalLinkDist(ft) .3]
TurnBayLength(ft) 100 140 565 335
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O O O
muced v/cRatio ‘9 0.11 0.05 0.20 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.24 0.04 0.02— Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 14.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 87 1 65 1 1 1 153 219 2 5 196 107
Future Vol, veh/h 87 1 65 1 1 1 153 219 2 5 196 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 121 1 90 1 1 1 213 304 3 7 272 149
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1110 1112 367 1037 1185 326 431 0 0 317 0 0 Stage 1 370 370 - 741 741 -------
Stage 2 740 742 - 297 445 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 182 203 666 204 184 702 1097 - - 1210 - - Stage 1 638 609 - 399 414 -------
Stage 2 399 414 - 699 565 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 134 151 653 130 137 689 1087 - - 1198 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 134 151 - 130 137 -------
Stage 1 627 599 - 302 314 -------
Stage 2 300 313 - 591 555 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 71.51 25.22 3.73 0.13

HCM LOS F D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 735 - - 134 151 653 182 27 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 - - 0.903 0.009 0.138 0.023 0.006 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.1 0 - 116.9 29 11.4 25.2 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - F D B D A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 6 0 0.5 0.1 0 - -
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 14.9
LaneConfigurations 1"i 1" iIlr 41) {$1 {$1
'afficVol,veh/h 87 1 65 1 1 1 153 219 2 5 196 107 —
FutureVoI,veh/h 87 1 65 1 1 1 153 219 2 5 196 107
InflictingPedsfi/hr1. 0 mum—104 Ola-m 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free lChannelized
StorageLength 140 500
m InMedianStorag— Grade,%
‘Hour Factor.—
HeavyVehicles,% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
”Flow W3 “504 3 / 7T1-
ConflictingFlowAll 1110 1112 36710371185 326 431 0 0 317 O O I Stage1 StageZ 740 742 370 370-
- 741 297 445
741- - - - -
- -—
IcaIHdwy 7-18 6-58 6287-18 6-58 628—
CriticalHdwyStg1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 -
lcalHdSt 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - Follow-upHdwy 3.572 4.0723.372 3.572 4.0723.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - leap-1Maneuver182 203666204184 _ Stage1 638 609 - 399 414 - - - - - - I StageZ 399 414 - 699565 — Platoonblocked,% - _ _ .Cap-1Maneuver 134 130'”’13—
MovCap-2Maneuver 134 151 - 130 137 - - - — — -
'Stage 1 m
StageZ 300 313 - 591 555 - - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 71.51 25.22 3.73 0.13

HCMLOS F D
n
lapacity(veh/h) 735 - - 134 151 653 182 27 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.196 - - 0.903 0.009 0.138 0.023 0.006 [M Ctr|D|y(s/v) 9.1 0‘ - 116.9 29 11.4 25.2 8‘4)— HCMLaneLOS A A - F D B D A A - Synchro 12 Report

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:58:16 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

SITE LAYOUT
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:58:16 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 489 2.0 981 0.498 100 6.4 LOS A 3.6 91.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 489 2.0 0.498 6.4 LOS A 3.6 91.0
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 3 2.0 624 0.005 100 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.005 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 823 2.0 1563 0.527 100 4.7 LOS A 4.9 125.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 823 2.0 0.527 4.7 LOS A 4.9 125.5
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 268 2.0 849 0.315 100 12.6 LOS B 1.8 46.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 268 2.0 0.315 12.6 LOS B 1.8 46.2
Intersection 1582 2.0 0.527 6.6 LOS A 4.9 125.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 16 472 1 489 2.0 981 0.498 100 NA NA
Approach 16 472 1 489 2.0 0.498
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 3 2.0 624 0.005 100 NA NA

LANE SUMMARY
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1OI 489 2.0 981 0.498 100 6.4 LOS A 3.6 91.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 489 2.0 0.498 6.4 LOS A 3.6 91.0
NorthEast: Private Dr (
Lane 1OI 3 2.0 624 0.005 100 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.005 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33) (‘
Lane 1OI 823 2.0 1563 0.527 100 4.7 LOS A 4.9 125.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 823 2.0 0.527 4.7 LOS A 4.9 125.5
SouthWest:DerrickAve(SR33) (‘
Lane 1OI 268 2.0 849 0.315 100 12.6 LOS B 1.8 46.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 268 2.0 0.315 12.6 LOS B 1.8 46.2
Intersection 1582 2.0 0.527 6.6 LOS A 4.9 125.5 B
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and WCratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (Wenot used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach —SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180) Lane1 16 472 1 489 2.0 9810.498 100 NA NA |
Approach 16 472 1 489 2.0 0.498
NorthEast: Private Dr
|Lane1 1 1 1 3 2.0 624 0.005 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.005
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 71 1 443 308 823 2.0 1563 0.527 100 NA NA
Approach 71 1 443 308 823 2.0 0.527
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 849 0.315 100 NA NA
Approach 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 0.315
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1582 2.0 0.527
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:17 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.005 I
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1 71 1 443 308 823 2.0 1563 0.527 100 NA NA |
Approach 71 1 443 308 823 2.0 0.527 I
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 849 0.315 100 NA NA
Approach 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 0.315
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1582 2.0 0.527
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied %
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:17 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing-PM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 5 1 9 14 143 1 22 9 83 30 1
Future Vol, veh/h 2 5 1 9 14 143 1 22 9 83 30 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 2 5 1 9 15 151 1 23 9 87 32 1
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 7.6 7.7 7.5 8.3

HCM LOSA A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 25% 5% 73%
Vol Thru, % 69% 63% 8% 26%
Vol Right, % 28% 13% 86% 1%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 32 8 166 114
LT Vol 1 2 9 83
Through Vol 22 5 14 30
RT Vol 9 1 143 1
Lane Flow Rate 34 8 175 120
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.041 0.011 0.187 0.149
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.346 4.494 3.853 4.47
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 829 800 937 793
Service Time 2.346 2.501 1.856 2.551
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.01 0.187 0.151
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 7.5 7.6 7.7 8.3
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0 0.7 0.5
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing-PM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 7.9
‘rsectionLOS A ‘ —LaneConfigurations ($1 41: 4‘;
Effie Vol,veh/h " 2 5 1 9 14 143 1 22 9 83 30 -1
FutureVol,veh/h 2 5 1 9 14 143 1 22 9 83 30
.k HourFactor L 1 1»
HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
'mt Flow _——2—"3—"1 9 15—161-1 23 9— 87 32-
NumberofLanes 0 1 O O 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 —OpposingApproach WB EB SB NB lbposingLanes 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - ConflictingApproachLeft SB NB EB WB InflictingLanesLeft — ConflictingApproachRight NB SB WB EB IflictingLanesRight -— HCMControlDelay,s/veh 7.6 7.7 7.5 8.3 [HOS ‘T"-'_ —VolLeft,% 3% 25% 5% 73%
'I'hru,% - 69% 63% 8% 26% — VolRight,% 28% 13% 86% 1%
.Control—n—Stop -Stop 8—
TrafficVolby Lane 166 114
m _2. 90—
ThroughVol
.ol —_
LaneFlowRate 34 8 175 120
ImetryGrp —
1" 1—
reeofUtil(X) 0.041 0.011 0.187 0.149
Max—#6 44943-853 4-—
Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
_829 800 937 7—
ServiceTime 2.346 2.501 1.856 2.551
14 LaneVICRati_75_0 01 0187 _
HCMControlDelay,s/veh .5 7.7 8.3
HCM95th-tileQ 0.1 0 0.7 0.5
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 73 140 271 301 23
Future Vol, veh/h 9 73 140 271 301 23
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 4 4 0 0 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 10 78 151 291 324 25
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 924 332 352 0 - 0
Stage 1 328 -----
Stage 2 596 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 295 703 1190 - - -
Stage 1 724 -----
Stage 2 544 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 256 698 1185 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 256 -----
Stage 1 629 -----
Stage 2 542 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.78 2.89 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1185 - 256 698 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.127 - 0.038 0.112 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.5 - 19.6 10.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.1 0.4 - -
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 2.6
LaneConfigurations ‘1 fl' ‘lfi 1|- + if
'6fficV0Lveh/h9 73 140271301 23 — FutureVol,veh/h 9 73 140 271 301 23 InflictingPeds.#/hr .. 4 4 0 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
lChannelized _
StorageLength 590 O O - - O
m inMedianStorage_
Grade,% O - - 0 O - ‘Hour Factor — HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 IWFIOW W 78'151 '2_
ConflictingFlow All 924 332 352 O - 0
I Stage1 328 — - - —
StageZ 596 - - - - - [cal Hdwy 6-4576-25—
CriticalHdwyStg1 5.45 - - - - _
lcaIHdWStgz 5-45 -— Follow-upHdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - - ICap-1Maneuver 2‘7— Stage1 724 - - - - - I Stage2 54—
Platoonblocked,% - _ _
.Cap-1Maneuver — MovCap-2Maneuver 256 - — - - _
'Stage 1 ‘—
Stage2 542 - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 11.78 2.89 0

HCMLOS B
I
lapacity(veh/h) 1185 - 256698 - -
HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.127 - 0.038 0.112 - - KM Ct” D'Y(SN) ___8-5 ' ,19-610-8_ HCMLaneLOS A - C B - - Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-PM
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 97 9 19 78 126 9 154 65 150 65 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 71 97 9 19 78 126 9 154 65 150 65 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 117 10 23 94 122 11 186 62 181 78 51 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 121 806 68 47 362 304 24 405 312 238 630 512 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 3187 268 1725 1721 1447 1725 1811 1395 1725 1811 1474 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 62 65 23 94 122 11 186 62 181 78 51 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1734 1725 1721 1447 1725 1811 1395 1725 1811 1474 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 1.4 1.4 0.7 2.3 3.6 0.3 4.4 1.8 5.0 1.5 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 1.4 1.4 0.7 2.3 3.6 0.3 4.4 1.8 5.0 1.5 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 121 435 439 47 362 304 24 405 312 238 630 512 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.14 0.15 0.49 0.26 0.40 0.45 0.46 0.20 0.76 0.12 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 555 1007 1015 277 730 614 243 1023 788 937 1752 1426 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.6 14.4 14.4 23.8 16.4 16.9 24.3 16.7 15.7 20.6 11.1 11.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.1 0.2 7.6 0.4 0.9 12.4 0.8 0.3 4.9 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.1 0.2 1.7 0.5 2.2 0.5 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 30.2 14.5 14.6 31.4 16.8 17.8 36.7 17.5 16.0 25.5 11.1 11.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B D B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 213 239 259 310
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.9 18.7 18.0 19.5
Approach LOS C B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.9 16.0 5.4 17.5 4.7 22.2 7.5 15.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 28.1 8.0 29.1 7.0 48.1 16.0 21.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 6.4 2.7 3.4 2.3 3.5 4.4 5.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.1 1.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.2
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-PM
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tr‘wvi J
Lane —Configurations ‘1 +12). ‘1 +12). ‘1 + F ‘1 1* il' Fffic Volume(veh/h) 71 97 9 19 78 126 9 154 65 150 65
FutureVolume(veh/h) 71 97 9 19 78 126 9 154 65 150 65 52 [ial Q(Qb),veh 0 o o r 0] 0 o 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) . . .94 [.00] .91 .00
ParkingBUS,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No3 5 g No: : g No: : :

AdjSat FIOW, veh/h/In 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 [FlowRate,veh/h.. fi 117t 10‘ 23‘ 94 z 122. 11‘ 186; 62.181: 78- PeakHourFactor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 [cent HeavyVeh,- 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6-
Cap,veh/h 121 806 68 47 362 304 24 405 312 238 630 512
live OnGreen “" 1.07 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.35 SatFlow,veh/h 1725 3187 268 1725 1721 1447 1725 1811 1395 1725 1811 1474 inVqme(v),veh/h" ‘86 62 65 23 94 122 11 186 62 181 78
GrpSatFIow(s),veh/h/In1725 1721 1734 1725 1721 1447 1725 1811 1395 1725 1811 1474 [Serve(gs_),s t. 4 1.4 1.4 0.7 2.3 3.6 0.3 4.4 1.8 5.0 1.5- CycleQClear(g_c),s 1.4 1.4 0.7 2.3 3.6 0.3 4.4 1.8 5.0 1.5 1.2 [p InLane x-4 30.15 _1.00 3 _1.00 1.00; _ 1.00 1.00 _ - LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 121 435 439 47 362 304 24 405 312 238 630 512 E Ratio(X) .-’I’ 0.14 0.15 0.49- 0.26 0.40 0.45 0.46 0.20 0.76 0.12 AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 555 1007 1015 277 730 614 243 1023 788 937 1752 1426 [M PlatoonRatio -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 liform Delay (d),s/veh -§_ 14.4 _14. 4 _.23 8 _16. 4 16.9 24.3 _.167 _.15 7 _20.6 _.11 1- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 7.6 0.2 7.6 0.9 12.4 0.8 0.3 4.9 0.1 0.1 lial Q
Delay<d3),s/veh _0 (1'0 (I0 0.0 0. 00.0 0.0 _0 0.0 H _O %i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.2 1.7 .3
lsig.MovementDelay,menu-LO 50- 5.. l 8. A I -0 A 2n. -0 LnGrpDelay(d),s/veh 30.2 14.5 14.6 31.4 16.8 17.8 36.7 17.5 16.0 25.5 11.1 11.0 lGrpLOS ApproachVol,veh/h _— 213 239 259 310
EproachDelay,s/veh r209 — 18.7— ‘— —18.0' — 19
ApproachLOS C B B B
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.9 16.0 5.4 17.5 4.7 22.2 7.5 15.4 Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 27.0 28.1 8.0 29.1 7.0 48.1 16.0 21.1 BxQCIearTime(g_c+l1),s 7.0 6.4 2.7 3.4 2.3 3.5 4.4—575:— GreenExtTime(p_c), s 0.5 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.1 1.1
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 19.2
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-PM
Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 128 23 246 11 186 78 181 78 63 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.15 0.12 0.45 0.06 0.49 0.18 0.50 0.09 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 29.6 20.0 30.8 14.5 31.0 28.0 1.0 28.2 12.0 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 29.6 20.0 30.8 14.5 31.0 28.0 1.0 28.2 12.0 0.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 14 8 16 4 60 0 59 14 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 46 32 50 20 134 0 131 50 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1243 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 512 1825 256 1264 223 946 797 864 1468 1190 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.07 0.09 0.19 0.05 0.20 0.10 0.21 0.05 0.05 Intersection Summary
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-PM
Queues 02/12/2026
f—rr*—*\ TIN»; J
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 86 128 23 246 11 186 78 181 78 63
'Ratio 0.32 0.15 0.12 0.45 0.06 0.49 0.18 0.50 0.09 0.08 _ ControlDelay(s/veh) 29.6 20.0 30.8 14.5 31.0 28.0 1.0 28.2 12.0 0.2 [we Delay '2: 0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 29.6 20.0 30.8 14.5 31.0 28.0 1.0 28.2 12.0 0.2 leue Length50th(ft) 14‘ 81 1 4
QueueLength95th(ft) 77 46 32 50 20 134 O 131 50 O
lernalLinkDist(ft) 3‘ 1
TurnBayLength(ft) 100 140 565 335
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O O O
muced v/cRatio ‘7 0.07 0.09 0.19 0.05 0.20 0.10 0.21 0.05 0.0_ Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46
Future Vol, veh/h 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 73 1 147 1 1 4 116 373 2 3 280 49
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 937 938 324 913 962 394 339 0 0 385 0 0 Stage 1 321 321 - 616 616 -------
Stage 2 616 618 - 297 345 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 239 258 703 248 250 642 1187 - - 1141 - - Stage 1 678 641 - 468 472 -------
Stage 2 468 472 - 699 625 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 202 221 690 166 214 630 1176 - - 1130 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 202 221 - 166 214 -------
Stage 1 670 633 - 405 409 -------
Stage 2 402 409 - 542 617 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.59 15.42 1.98 0.08

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 425 - - 202 221 690 352 17 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 - - 0.362 0.005 0.214 0.018 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.4 0 - 32.6 21.4 11.6 15.4 8.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - D C B C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 1.6 0 0.8 0.1 0 - -
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
IntDelay,s/veh 5
LaneConfigurations 1''i 1" iIlr 4!) 41: {$1
'afficVol,veh/h 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46 _ FutureVol,veh/h 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46 InflictingPedsfi/hr 4'- 0 1111.110-434. 101 Oil-M 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free lChannelized
StorageLength 140 500
m InMedianStora9_
Grade,%
‘Hour Facto—
HeavyVehicles,% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Imw W1 14/ 141 4 116 373 2 3 280_
ConflictingFlow All 937 938 324 913 962 394 339 0 0 385 O O 'Stage1 StageZ 616 618 321 321- - 616 297 345
616- - - - -
- -—
Icamdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 658 628—
CriticalHdwyStg1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 -
lcalHdSt 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - Follow-upHdwy 3.572 4.0723.372 3.572 4.0723.372 2.272 - 2.272 - lCap-1Maneuver 239258703248250.6— Stage1 678 641 - 468 472 - I StageZ 468 472 - 699 625 — Platoonblocked,% ICap—1Maneuve 202 221meeom166 214—
MovCap-2Maneuver 202 221 - 166 214 -
'Stage1 6 - StageZ 402 409 - 542 617 - - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 18.59 15.42 1.98 0.08

HCMLOS C C
I
lapacity(veh/h) 425 - - 202 221 690 352 17 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.099 - - 0.362 0.005 0.214 0.018 0.003 [M CtrIDIy(s/v) 8.4 0 - 32.621.411.615.4 8.2‘_0__-_
HCMLaneLOS A A - D C B C A A
Synchro 12 Report

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:58:46 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

SITE LAYOUT
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:58:46 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 575 5.0 964 0.597 100 8.1 LOS A 5.3 136.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 575 5.0 0.597 8.1 LOS A 5.3 136.6
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 4 5.0 519 0.008 100 9.5 LOS A 0.0 1.2 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.008 9.5 LOS A 0.0 1.2
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 1026 5.0 1310 0.783 100 6.0 LOS A 11.5 298.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1026 5.0 0.783 6.0 LOS A 11.5 298.3
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 207 5.0 692 0.299 100 13.6 LOS B 1.9 49.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 207 5.0 0.299 13.6 LOS B 1.9 49.0
Intersection 1812 5.0 0.783 7.5 LOS A 11.5 298.3
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 76 497 1 575 5.0 964 0.597 100 NA NA
Approach 76 497 1 575 5.0 0.597
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 4 5.0 519 0.008 100 NA NA

LANE SUMMARY
W’ Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1OI 575 5.0 964 0.597 100 8.1 LOS A 5.3 136.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 575 5.0 0.597 8.1 LOS A 5.3 136.6
NorthEast: Private Dr (
Lane 1OI 4 5.0 519 0.008 100 9.5 LOS A 0.0 1.2 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.008 9.5 LOS A 0.0 1.2
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33) (‘
Lane 1OI 1026 5.0 1310 0.783 100 6.0 LOS A 11.5 298.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1026 5.0 0.783 6.0 LOS A 11.5 298.3
SouthWest:DerrickAve(SR33) (‘
Lane 1OI 207 5.0 692 0.299 100 13.6 LOS B 1.9 49.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 207 5.0 0.299 13.6 LOS B 1.9 49.0
Intersection 1812 5.0 0.783 7.5 LOS A 11.5 298.3 B
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and WCratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (Wenot used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach —SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180) Lane1 76 497 1 575 5.0 964 0.597 100 NA NA |
Approach 76 497 1 575 5.0 0.597
NorthEast: Private Dr
|Lane1 1 1 1 4 5.0 519 0.008 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.008
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 108 1 474 443 1026 5.0 1310 0.783 100 NA NA
Approach 108 1 474 443 1026 5.0 0.783
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 692 0.299 100 NA NA
Approach 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 0.299
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1812 5.0 0.783
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:15 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.008 I
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 108 1 474 443 1026 5.0 13100.783 100 NA NA I
Approach 108 1 474 443 1026 5.0 0.783 I
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 692 0.299 100 NA NA
Approach 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 0.299
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1812 5.0 0.783
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied %
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:15 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 17 4 24 38 129 3 30 15 152 38 12
Future Vol, veh/h 6 17 4 24 38 129 3 30 15 152 38 12
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 8 23 5 32 51 172 4 40 20 203 51 16
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.4 9.6 8.3 10.7

HCM LOSA A A B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 6% 22% 13% 75%
Vol Thru, % 63% 63% 20% 19%
Vol Right, % 31% 15% 68% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 48 27 191 202
LT Vol 3 6 24 152
Through Vol 30 17 38 38
RT Vol 15 4 129 12
Lane Flow Rate 64 36 255 269
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.086 0.051 0.316 0.363
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.82 5.073 4.473 4.846
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 738 702 802 741
Service Time 2.883 3.134 2.515 2.896
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 0.051 0.318 0.363
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.3 8.4 9.6 10.7
HCM Lane LOS AAAB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.2 1.4 1.7
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 9.9
‘rsectionLOS A ‘ —LaneConfigurations
Efrc Vol veh/h ‘1 6 17 4 24 38 129 3 30 15 152 38- FutureVol veh/h 4 24 38 129 3 30 15 152 38 12 lk HourFactor ——-— HeavyVehicles,%
'mt Flow W2 '51—772— 40 i 20 203'551_5
Number of Lanes 0 1 O O 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 —OpposingApproach WB EB SB NB lbposingLanes 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - ConflictingApproachLeft SB NB EB WB InflictingLanesLeft — ConflictingApproachRight NB SB WB EB IflictingLanesRight ._ — HCMControlDelay,s/veh 8.4 9.6 8.3 10.7 lfLOS m —VolLeft,% 6% 22% 13% 75%
'I'hru,% - 63% 63% 20% 19% — VolRight % 31% 15% 68% 6%
.Control _n_ Stop Stop St—
TrafficVolby Lane 27 191 202
m _ 63 24 1—
ThroughVol 17
.ol —3 4'29 — LaneFlowRate 255
ImetryGrp
—
31 ' 126—
reeofUtil(X) 0.086 0.051 0.316 0.363
Max—82 5-073 4-473 4-8—
Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
—738 702 802 74—
ServiceTime 2.883 3.134 2.515 2.896
14 LaneVICRafi—7 0-051 _ 0-318 0-_
HCMControlDelay,s/veh 8.4 9.6 10.7
HCM95th-tileQ 0.3 0.2 1.4 1.7
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 117 146 186 334 32
Future Vol, veh/h 29 117 146 186 334 32
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 35 35 35 0 0 35
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 39 156 195 248 445 43
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1153 515 523 0 - 0
Stage 1 480 -----
Stage 2 672 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 215 554 1028 - - -
Stage 1 616 -----
Stage 2 502 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 162 517 994 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 162 -----
Stage 1 479 -----
Stage 2 485 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.74 4.18 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 994 - 162 517 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 - 0.239 0.302 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.5 - 34.1 14.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 0.9 1.3 - -
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 4.9
LaneConfigurations‘l'i i‘If ‘lfi 1|- + if
'6fficV0Lveh/h29 117146186334 32 — FutureVol,veh/h 29 117 146 186 334 32 InflictingPeds.#/hr 35 35 35 0 0 — SignControl Stop Stop Free Free Free Free IChannelized ‘Non_
StorageLength 590 O O - - O
m inMedianStorage_
Grade,% O - - 0 O - ‘Hour Facto: — HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 IWFIOW 3? 156 ‘195‘2_
ConflictingFlow All 1153 515 523 O - 0
I Stage1 480 — - - — StageZ 672 - - - - - [cal Hdwy 6.4576.2— CriticalHdwyStg1 5.45 - - - - _
lcaIHdWStgz 5-45 -— Follow-upHdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - - ICap-1Maneuver 2‘55— Stage1 616 - - - - - I Stage2 5_
Platoonblocked,% - _ _
.Cap-1Maneuver — MovCap-2Maneuver 162 - — - - _
'Stage 1 _
Stage2 485 - - - - -
CtrlDly,S/V 18.74 4.18 0

HCMLOS C
I
lapacity(veh/h) 994 - 162 517 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.196 - 0.239 0.302 - - KM cmW(SN) _____9-5' 34-1 149— HCMLaneLOS A - D B - -
Synchro 12 Report
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.7
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 37 31 43 87 13
Future Vol, veh/h 8 37 31 43 87 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 9 40 34 47 95 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 80 0 - 0 115 57
Stage 1 - - - - 57 -
Stage 2 - - - - 58 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1517 - - - 882 1009
Stage 1 - - - - 965 -
Stage 2 - - - - 965 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1517 - - - 876 1009
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 876 -
Stage 1 - - - - 960 -
Stage 2 - - - - 965 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.31 0 9.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 320 - - - 892
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.122
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.4 0 - - 9.6
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4
4: Belmont Ave &Amador Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 4.7
LaneConfigurations 4‘ 13! 1|‘I’If
'afficVoLveh/h8 37 31 43 87 13 — FutureVo|,veh/h 8 37 31 43 87 13 InflictingPedsfi/hr‘u 0‘ 0 a
0—
SignControl Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
IChannelized _
StorageLength - - - - O - m inMedianStora—
Grade,% - O O - O - ‘Hour Facto—
HeavyVehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
ITFIOW ‘T 40 34" 47 95 _
ConflictingFlow All 80 O - 0 115 57
I Stage1 - - 'l'- - 57 - — StageZ - - - - 58 - [cal Hdwy — CriticalHdwyStg1 - - - - 5.42 - IcaIHdwyStQZ Follow-upHdwy 2.218 —.42 — - - - 3.518 3.318
ICap-1Maneuver — Stage1 - - - - 965 - I Stage2 — Platoonblocked,% - - _ .Cap-1Maneuve—
MovCap-2Maneuver - - - - 876 -
'Stage1 _
Stage2 - - - - 965 -
CtrlDly,s/v 1.31 0 9.6

HCMLOS A
I
lapacity(veh/h) 320 - - - 892
HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.006 - - - 0.122
KM cmW(S/V) A 7-4 —0—-—'— ' 9-6 — HCMLaneLOS A A - - A
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-AM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 170 29 10 78 139 17 18 13 240 44 15 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 170 29 10 78 139 17 18 13 240 44 15 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 243 40 14 111 156 24 26 13 343 63 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 42 590 95 31 334 288 50 260 206 431 661 538
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.25 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2940 475 1725 1721 1485 1725 1811 1433 1725 1811 1476 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 20 140 143 14 111 156 24 26 13 343 63 1 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1694 1725 1721 1485 1725 1811 1433 1725 1811 1476 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 3.3 3.4 0.4 2.6 4.3 0.6 0.6 0.4 8.5 1.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 3.3 3.4 0.4 2.6 4.3 0.6 0.6 0.4 8.5 1.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 42 345 340 31 334 288 50 260 206 431 661 538 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.41 0.42 0.46 0.33 0.54 0.48 0.10 0.06 0.80 0.10 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 301 791 779 263 754 650 263 872 690 1578 2253 1836 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.1 16.0 16.0 22.3 15.9 16.7 22.0 17.1 17.0 16.1 9.6 9.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.0 0.8 0.8 10.2 0.6 1.6 7.2 0.2 0.1 3.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.2 1.2 0.2 0.9 1.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 3.3 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 30.1 16.7 16.8 32.5 16.5 18.2 29.1 17.2 17.1 19.5 9.7 9.3 LnGrp LOS CBBCBBCBBBAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 303 281 63 407
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.7 18.3 21.7 17.9
Approach LOS B B C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.5 11.5 4.8 14.1 5.3 21.6 5.1 13.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 42.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 7.0 57.1 8.0 20.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.5 2.6 2.4 5.4 2.6 3.1 2.5 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.2
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-AM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tx’\$ J
Lane —Configurations ‘1 +12) ‘1 +12). 1''i + F ‘1 + F
Effie Volume(veh/h) 14 170 29 1O 78 139 17 18 13 240 44 FutureVolume(veh/h) 14 170 29 1O 78 139 17 18 13 240 44 15 [ial Q(Qb),veh o 0 o o o 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) .95 . .97 . ' .93 .00
ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No: ‘ No‘ ; No' : 5
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 [Flow Rate,veh/h _243 ‘ 40.14.1113156. 24‘ 26‘ 13.343 ‘ 6- PeakHourFactor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 [cent HeavyVeh,- 6 6 6Z 6Z 6 6 6 6 6 6 6-
Cap,veh/h 42 590 95 31 334 288 50 260 206 431 661 538
live OnGreen "' ‘32 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.25 0.36 S_atFlow,veh/h 1725 2940 475 1725 1721 1485 1725 1811 1433 1725 1811 1476 loVqme(v),veh/h" ‘20 140 143 14 111 156 24 26 13 343 63 GrpSatFIow(s),veh/h/In1725 1721 1694 1725 1721 1485 1725 1811 1433 1725 1811 1476 [Serve(g_s),s ‘95 3.3 3.4 0.4 2.6 4.3 0.6 0.6 0.4 8.5 1.1- CycleQ Clear(g_c),s 0.5 3.3 3.4 0.4 2.6 4.3 0.6 0.6 0.4 8.5 1.1 0.0 [p InLane m _028 1.00a 1.00 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00: - LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 42 345 340 31 334 288 50 260 206 431 661 538 I: Ratio(X) m 0.41 0.42 0.46 —0.33 0.54 0.48 0.10 0.06 0.80 0.10 AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 301 791 779 263 754 650 263 872 690 1578 2253 1836 [M PlatoonRatio -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 liform Delay (d),s/veh -]_16._0 —16.0 22.3 15.9 _16.7 _.220 _.—171__17.0 __.161_9.6- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 8.0 0.8 10.2 0.6 7.2 0.2 3.4 0.0
lial Q
Delay(d3),s/veh“0- 0.0- 0.0 0-0.0 0-3.0- 8.0 0.0-II
%i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.3 .0
lsigMovementDelay,“eh-l. l A 20‘ 91- ‘A‘--.-
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 30.1 16.7 16.8 32.5 16.5 18.2 29.1 17.2 17.1 19.5 .3 lGrpLOS ApproachVol,veh/h _— 303 281 63 407
EproachDelay,s/veh r17] — 18.3' — 21.7 17.

ApproachLOS B B C B
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 15.5 11.5 4.8 14.1 5.3 21.6 5.1 13.8 IIange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 42.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 7.0 57.1 8.0 20.1 mCIearTime(g_c+I1),s10.5 2.6* 2.4—5.4— 2.6 3.1 2.5 6_
GreenExtTime(p_c), s 1.1 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.3
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 18.2
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-AM Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 20 284 14 310 24 26 19 343 63 21
v/c Ratio 0.09 0.40 0.06 0.40 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.61 0.07 0.03 Control Delay (s/veh) 25.9 20.1 26.3 9.9 26.5 25.7 0.4 20.2 11.2 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 25.9 20.1 26.3 9.9 26.5 25.7 0.4 20.2 11.2 0.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 32 3 12 6 6 0 74 6 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 72 18 35 26 27 0 154 34 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2611 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 291 1498 255 1406 255 847 750 1462 1709 1379 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.05 0.22 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.23 0.04 0.02 Intersection Summary
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-AM Queues 02/12/2026
f—rr*—*\ TIN»; J
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 20 284 14 310 24 26 19 343 63 21
'Ratio 0.09 0.40 0.06 0.40 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.61 0.07 0.03 _ ControlDelay(s/veh) 25.9 20.1 26.3 9.9 26.5 25.7 0.4 20.2 11.2 0.1 [we Delay '2: _ 0.0 _ 0.0‘ 0.0‘ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.

TotalDelay(s/veh) 25.9 20.1 26.3 9.9 26.5 25.7 0.4 20.2 11.2 0.1 leue Length50th(ft) , 1
QueueLength95th(ft) 23 72 18 35 26 27 O 154 34 O
lernal LinkDist(ft)
TurnBayLength(ft) 100 140 565 335
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O O O
muced v/cRatio ‘7 0.19 0.05 0.22 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.23 0.04 0.02— Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 18.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107
Future Vol, veh/h 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 121 1 139 1 1 1 231 311 3 7 292 149
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1173 1175 386 1100 1248 333 450 0 0 324 0 0 Stage 1 390 390 - 784 784 -------
Stage 2 783 785 - 316 464 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 164 187 649 185 169 696 1079 - - 1203 - - Stage 1 622 597 - 378 396 -------
Stage 2 378 395 - 682 553 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 117 134 637 103 121 682 1069 - - 1191 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 117 134 - 103 121 -------
Stage 1 612 587 - 276 289 -------
Stage 2 275 289 - 523 544 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 82.1 28.95 3.93 0.12

HCM LOS F D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 761 - - 117 134 637 154 26 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.216 - - 1.033 0.01 0.218 0.027 0.006 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.3 0 - 163 32.1 12.2 29 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - F D B D A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - 7 0 0.8 0.1 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
IntDelay,s/veh 18.9
LaneConfigurations 1"i 1" i" 4!) e111 e111
'afficVol,veh/h 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107 —
FutureVoI,veh/h 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107
InflictingPedsfi/hr1- 0 HOMO-110 . 03.1w 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free lChannelized
StorageLength 140 500
m InMedianStorag— Grade,%
‘Hour Factor.—
HeavyVehicles,% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
”Flow _'|'2'|-’ 1 fiw 14—F— 1 731*511 5 / 29_
ConflictingFIOWAII 1173 1175 386 1100 1248 333 450 0 0 324 O O 'Stage1 StageZ 783 785 390 390- - 784 316 464
784- - - - -
- -—
Icamdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 658 628—
CriticalHdwyStg1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 -
lcalHdSt 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - Follow-upHdwy 3.572 4.0723.372 3.572 4.0723.372 2.272 - -2.272 - leap-1Maneuver164187649185169 69— Stage1 622 597 - 378 396 - I StageZ 378395m 2682 553 — Platoonblocked,% neap-1Maneuvre ~117 mama 121— MovCap-ZManeuver ~117 134 - 103 121 -
'Stage1 ' - Stage2 275 289 - 523 544 - - - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 82.1 28.95 3.93 0.12

HCMLOS F D
s
lapacity(veh/h) 761 - - 117 134 637 154 26 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.216 - - 1.0330.010.218 0.0270.006 - - |CMCtr|D|y(s/v) 9.3 o - 163 32.1 12.2 29 8 o - HCMLaneLOS A A - F D B D A A - ICM95th%tileQ(veh) 0.8 - - 7 o 0.8 0.1 0 - - - mlume exceedscapacity $:Delayexceeds300$ - +: ComputationNotDefined *: All major volumein platoon Synchro 12 Report

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:59:15 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

SITE LAYOUT
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:59:15 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 505 2.0 959 0.527 100 6.9 LOS A 4.0 102.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 505 2.0 0.527 6.9 LOS A 4.0 102.3
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 3 2.0 594 0.005 100 8.6 LOS A 0.0 0.8 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.005 8.6 LOS A 0.0 0.8
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 899 2.0 1568 0.573 100 4.9 LOS A 5.9 150.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 899 2.0 0.573 4.9 LOS A 5.9 150.0
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 268 2.0 824 0.325 100 13.0 LOS B 1.9 48.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 268 2.0 0.325 13.0 LOS B 1.9 48.3
Intersection 1675 2.0 0.573 6.8 LOS A 5.9 150.0
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 16 489 1 505 2.0 959 0.527 100 NA NA
Approach 16 489 1 505 2.0 0.527
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 3 2.0 594 0.005 100 NA NA

LANE SUMMARY
W’ Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1OI 505 2.0 959 0.527 100 6.9 LOS A 4.0 102.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 505 2.0 0.527 6.9 LOS A 4.0 102.3
NorthEast: Private Dr (
Lane 1OI 3 2.0 594 0.005 100 8.6 LOS A 0.0 0.8 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.005 8.6 LOS A 0.0 0.8
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33) (‘
Lane 1OI 899 2.0 1568 0.573 100 4.9 LOS A 5.9 150.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 899 2.0 0.573 4.9 LOS A 5.9 150.0
SouthWest:DerrickAve(SR33) (‘
Lane 1OI 268 2.0 824 0.325 100 13.0 LOS B 1.9 48.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 268 2.0 0.325 13.0 LOS B 1.9 48.3
Intersection 1675 2.0 0.573 6.8 LOS A 5.9 150.0 B
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and WCratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (Wenot used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach —SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180) Lane1 16 489 1 505 2.0 959 0.527 100 NA NA |
Approach 16 489 1 505 2.0 0.527
NorthEast: Private Dr
|Lane1 1 1 1 3 2.0 594 0.005 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.005
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 96 1 453 349 899 2.0 1568 0.573 100 NA NA
Approach 96 1 453 349 899 2.0 0.573
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 824 0.325 100 NA NA
Approach 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 0.325
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1675 2.0 0.573
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:18 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.005 I
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 96 1 453 349 899 2.0 15680.573 100 NA NA I
Approach 96 1 453 349 899 2.0 0.573 I
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 824 0.325 100 NA NA
Approach 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 0.325
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1675 2.0 0.573
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied %
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:18 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 10 1 9 22 159 1 22 9 93 30 1
Future Vol, veh/h 2 10 1 9 22 159 1 22 9 93 30 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 2 11 1 9 23 167 1 23 9 98 32 1
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 7.6 8 7.6 8.5

HCM LOSA A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 15% 5% 75%
Vol Thru, % 69% 77% 12% 24%
Vol Right, % 28% 8% 84% 1%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 32 13 190 124
LT Vol 1 2 9 93
Through Vol 22 10 22 30
RT Vol 9 1 159 1
Lane Flow Rate 34 14 200 131
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.041 0.017 0.217 0.164
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.418 4.56 3.902 4.529
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 813 788 926 781
Service Time 2.432 2.569 1.904 2.626
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 0.018 0.216 0.168
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 7.6 7.6 8 8.5
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.6
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 8.1
‘rsectionLOS A ‘ —LaneConfigurations ($1 41: 4‘;
Effie Vol,veh/h " 2 10 1 9 22 159 1 22 9 93 30 -1
FutureVol,veh/h 2 1O 1 9 22 159 1 22 9 93 30
.k HourFactor 5 x 1 La
HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
'mt Flow W1 9 23—1'67'1 23 9—98 —32-
NumberofLanes 0 1 O O 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 —OpposingApproach WB EB SB NB lbposingLanes 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - ConflictingApproachLeft SB NB EB WB InflictingLanesLeft — ConflictingApproachRight NB SB WB EB IflictingLanesRight -— HCMControlDelay,s/veh 7.6 8 7.6 8.5 lfLOS m —VolLeft,% 3% 15% 5% 75%
'I'hru,% - 69% 77% 12% 24% — VolRight,% 28% 8% 84% 1%
.Control—E£Stop -Stop 8—
TrafficVolby Lane 13 190 124
m —2 2. 9—
ThroughVol 22 10 22 30
.0' —'9—
LaneFlowRate 34 14 200 131
ImetryGrp
— 1r 1— reeofUtil(X) 0.041 0.017 0.217 0.164
Max—8 4-56 3-902 4-5—
Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
_13 788 926 78—
ServiceTime 2.432 2.569 1.904 2.626
14 LaneVICRafi—2 0-018 0-216 01.—
HCMControlDelay,s/veh 7.6 8 8.5
HCM95th-tileQ 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.6
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 77 140 287 311 23
Future Vol, veh/h 10 77 140 287 311 23
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 4 4 0 0 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 11 83 151 309 334 25
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 952 342 363 0 - 0
Stage 1 338 -----
Stage 2 614 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 284 693 1179 - - -
Stage 1 715 -----
Stage 2 534 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 246 688 1175 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 246 -----
Stage 1 621 -----
Stage 2 532 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.02 2.79 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1175 - 246 688 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.128 - 0.044 0.12 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.5 - 20.3 10.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.1 0.4 - -
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 2.6
LaneConfigurations ‘1 fl' ‘lfi 1|- + if
'6fficV0Lveh/h10 77 140287311 23 — FutureVol,veh/h 1O 77 140 287 311 23 InflictingPeds.#/hr J 4 4 0 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
IChanneIized _
StorageLength 590 O O - - O
m inMedianStorage_
Grade,% O - - 0 O - ‘Hour Factox — HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 ”Flow TT 83 151 '309 34
ConflictingFlow All 952 342 363 O - 0
' Stage1 338 — - - —
Stage2 614 - - - - - [cal Hdwy 6.49762—
CriticalHdwyStg1 5.45 - - - - _
lcaIHdWStgz 5-45 -— Follow-upHdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - - lCap-1Maneuve Stage1 715
we—- - - - - Sta 32 53 I g _
Platoonblocked,% - _ _
.Cap-1Maneuver — MovCap-2Maneuver 246 - — - - _
'Stage 1 ‘—
Stage2 532 - - - - -
CtrlDly,S/V 12.02 2.79 0

HCMLOS B
I
lapacity(veh/h) 1175 - 246 688 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.128 - 0.044 0.12 - - KM cmW(SN) _._._8-5 ' .20-310-9.— HCMLaneLOS A - C B - -
Synchro 12 Report
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 35 74 29 127 81 16
Future Vol, veh/h 35 74 29 127 81 16
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 38 80 32 138 88 17
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 170 0 - 0 257 101
Stage 1 - - - - 101 -
Stage 2 - - - - 157 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1408 - - - 732 955
Stage 1 - - - - 923 -
Stage 2 - - - - 872 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1408 - - - 711 955
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 711 -
Stage 1 - - - - 897 -
Stage 2 - - - - 872 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.45 0 10.65

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 578 - - - 742
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 - - - 0.142
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 0 - - 10.7
HCM Lane LOS A A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.5
4: Belmont Ave &Amador Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
IntDelay,s/veh 3.6
LaneConfigurations 4‘ 11; Y
'afficVoLveh/h35 74 29 127 81 16 — FutureVol,veh/h 35 74 29 127 81 16 InflictingPeds,#/hr3- 0 0... 0 .
0—
SignControl Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
IChannelized _
StorageLength - - - - O - m inMedianStora—
Grade,% - O O - O - ‘Hour Factor..—
HeavyVehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
ITFIOW 3‘? 80 v32"138 88_
ConflictingFlow All 170 0 - O 257 101
' Stage1 - - 'I'- - 101 - — StageZ - - - - 157 - [cal Hdwy — CriticalHdwyStg1 - - - - 5.42 - lcal HdwyStg2
Follow-upHdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
ICap—1Maneuver — Stage1 - - - - 923 - I Stage2 — Platoonblocked,% - - _ .Cap-1Maneuve—
MovCap-2Maneuver - - - - 711 -
'Stage1 _
Stage2 - - - - 872 -
CtrlDly,s/v 2.45 0 10.65

HCMLOS B
I
lapacity(veh/h) 578 - - - 742
HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.027 - - - 0.142
KM cmW(S/V) 7-6 Q—-‘— ' 10-7 — HCMLaneLOS A A - - B
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-PM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 44 151 36 19 157 117 47 122 65 139 48 41 Future Volume (veh/h) 44 151 36 19 157 117 47 122 65 139 48 41 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 182 42 23 189 111 57 147 62 167 58 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 91 699 155 48 479 264 96 385 295 222 517 405 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2746 611 1725 2093 1153 1725 1811 1389 1725 1811 1418 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 112 112 23 153 147 57 147 62 167 58 37 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1636 1725 1721 1526 1725 1811 1389 1725 1811 1418 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 2.4 2.6 0.6 3.6 3.9 1.5 3.3 1.7 4.4 1.1 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 2.4 2.6 0.6 3.6 3.9 1.5 3.3 1.7 4.4 1.1 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 91 438 416 48 394 349 96 385 295 222 517 405 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.25 0.27 0.48 0.39 0.42 0.59 0.38 0.21 0.75 0.11 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 584 1059 1007 292 768 681 255 1077 826 985 1843 1444 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.9 14.0 14.1 22.6 15.4 15.5 21.8 15.9 15.3 19.9 12.5 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.7 0.3 0.3 7.4 0.6 0.8 5.7 0.6 0.3 5.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.3 1.3 1.3 0.7 1.3 0.5 1.9 0.4 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 27.5 14.3 14.4 30.1 16.0 16.3 27.5 16.6 15.7 25.0 12.6 12.5 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 277 323 266 262
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.9 17.2 18.7 20.5
Approach LOS B B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.1 15.0 5.3 16.9 6.6 18.4 6.5 15.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 28.1 8.0 29.1 7.0 48.1 16.0 21.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 5.3 2.6 4.6 3.5 3.1 3.4 5.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 1.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.1 1.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.2
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-PM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tx’\i J
Lane —Configurations ‘1 +12) ‘1 +11). ‘1 + F ‘1 + F
fiffic Volume(veh/h) 44 151 36 19 157 117 47 122 65 139 48- FutureVolume(veh/h) 44 151 36 19 157 117 47 122 65 139 48 41 [ial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) .92 .00 . . .91 .00
ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No: : : No: 5 g No5 I :

AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 [Flow Rate,veh/h.‘ 182: 42. 23; 189:111. 57t 147: 62.1675 58- PeakHourFactor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 [cent HeavyVeh,— 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6-
Cap,veh/h 91 699 155 48 479 264 96 385 295 222 517 405
live OnGreen "’ 1.05 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.29 gt Flow,veh/h 1725 2746 611 1725 2093 1153 1725 1811 1389 1725 1811 1418 lovOIume(v),veh/h"‘53 112 112 23 153 147 57 147 62 167 58 GrpSatFlow(s),veh/h/In1725 1721 1636 1725 1721 1526 1725 1811 1389 1725 1811 1418 [Serve(g_s),s ‘14 2.4 2.6 0.6 3.6 3.9 1.5 3.3 1.7 4.4 1.1- CycleQClear(g_c),s 1.4 2.4 2.6 0.6 3.6 3.9 1.5 3.3 1.7 4.4 1.1 0.9 [p InLane m 0.37 1.00 0.76 1.00; _1.00 1.00t -
LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 91 438 416 48 394 349 96 385 295 222 517 405 I) Ratio(X) .‘8 0.25 0.27 0.48 0.39 0.42 0.59 0.38 0.21 0.75 0.11 AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 584 1059 1007 292 768 681 255 1077 826 985 1843 1444 [M PlatoonRatio ; .30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 liform Delay (d),s/veh -9_14._0 14.1_.226 _15.4_.155 _21.8 _15.9 _15.3 _19.9125- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 5.7 0.3 0.3 7.4 0.6 0.8 5.7 5.1 0.1 0.1 lial Q
Delay(d3),s/veh“0 (.0- PO 0.0 0-0- 3-0- 0.0 :3-0- 0-0- 0.0- - %i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.7 o.7 0.3 lsigMovementDelay,8W1... 90- A 3.. l ‘ I130. .1 90- 4-
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 27.5 4.3 14.4 30.1 16.O 16.3 27.5 16.6 15.7 25.0 12.6 12.5 lGrpLOS _-
ApproachVol,veh/h 277 323 266 262
EproachDelay,s/veh — 16.9 — 172' 7' —'18.7— v 20
ApproachLOS B B B C
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 10.1 15.0 5.3 16.9 6.6 18.4 6.5 15.7 Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 27.0 28.1 8.0 29.1 7.0 48.1 16.0 21.1 ExQCIearTime(g_c+I1),s6.4 5.3 2.6 4.6 3.5 3.1 3.4 5_
GreenExtTime(p_c), s 0.4 1.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.1 1.5
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 18.2
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-PM Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 225 23 330 57 147 78 167 58 49 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.24 0.10 0.45 0.23 0.37 0.18 0.41 0.09 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 27.6 15.9 28.9 15.6 30.1 25.6 0.9 25.0 16.1 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 27.6 15.9 28.9 15.6 30.1 25.6 0.9 25.0 16.1 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 24 7 31 19 46 0 52 16 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 52 68 30 72 58 107 0 117 41 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2599 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 630 2009 315 1582 275 1081 886 1001 1521 1171 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.11 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.09 0.17 0.04 0.04 Intersection Summary
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-PM Queues 02/12/2026
f—rr*—*\ TIN»; J
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 53 225 23 330 57 147 78 167 58 49
'Ratio 0.19 0.24 0.10 0.45 0.23 0.37 0.18 0.41 0.09 0.09 _ ControlDelay(s/veh) 27.6 15.9 28.9 15.6 30.1 25.6 0.9 25.0 16.1 0.3 [we Delay '2': 0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0: 0.0 0.0‘ 0.0 0.0; 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 27.6 15.9 28.9 15.6 30.1 25.6 0.9 25.0 16.1 0.3 leue Length50th(ft) _ 24‘ 71 3 19 ' QueueLength95th(ft) 52 68 30 72 58 107 O 117 41 O lernalLinkDist(ft) 9‘]
TurnBayLength(ft) 100 140 565 335
lse Capacity(vph) —— StarvationCapReductn O O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O O O
muced v/cRatio ‘8 0.11 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.09 0.17 0.04 0.0_ Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 1 161 1 1 4 147 363 2 3 270 46
Future Vol, veh/h 68 1 161 1 1 4 147 363 2 3 270 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 73 1 173 1 1 4 158 390 2 3 290 49
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1048 1050 335 1025 1074 411 350 0 0 402 0 0 Stage 1 332 332 - 718 718 -------
Stage 2 717 719 - 307 356 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 200 222 693 208 215 628 1176 - - 1124 - - Stage 1 669 634 - 411 424 -------
Stage 2 411 424 - 690 618 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 160 179 680 125 173 616 1165 - - 1114 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 160 179 - 125 173 -------
Stage 1 661 626 - 336 347 -------
Stage 2 333 347 - 507 610 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 21.94 17.45 2.46 0.08

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 516 - - 160 179 680 296 16 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.136 - - 0.457 0.006 0.255 0.022 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.6 0 - 45.2 25.2 12.1 17.4 8.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - E D B C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 2.1 0 1 0.1 0 - -
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
IntDelay,s/veh 6
LaneConfigurations 1''i 1" iIlr 41) {$1 41:
'afficVol,veh/h 68 1 161 1 1 4 147 363 2 3 270 46 _ FutureVol,veh/h 68 1 161 1 1 4 147 363 2 3 270 46 InflictingPedsfi/hr 4'- 0 11u1<_l10 .1 0L1..- 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free lChannelized - StorageLength 140 500
m InMedianStora9_
Grade,%
‘Hour Facto—
HeavyVehicles,% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Imw ‘73,;1 1/3 1 1 4 158 “390‘2 3 290_
ConflictingFIOWAII 1048 1050 335 1025 1074 411 350 0 0 402 O O 'Stage1 StageZ 717 719 332 332-
- 718 307 356
718- - - - -
- -—
Icamdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 658 628—
CriticalHdwyStg1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 -
lcalHd Stgz 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - Follow-upHdwy 3.572 4.0723.372 3.572 4.0723.372 2.272 - -2.272 leap-1Maneuver 200222693208215 _
Stage1 669 634 - 411 424 - I StageZ 411424 - :690618—
Platoonblocked,%
.Cap-1 Maneuver160 179.1 «80' ins-1m
MovCap-2Maneuver 160 179 - 125 173 - - - - - - -
'Stage1'm
StageZ 333 347 - 507 610 - - - - - - -
CtrlDly,s/v 21.94 17.45 2.46 0.08

HCMLOS C C
L
lapacity(veh/h) 516 - - 160 179 680 296 16 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.136 - - 0.457 0.006 0.255 0.022 0.003 [M CtrIDIy(s/v) 8.6 0 - 45.2 25.2 12.1 17.4 8.2__o__-_
HCMLaneLOS A A - E D B C A A
Synchro 12 Report

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:59:39 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

SITE LAYOUT
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:59:39 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 575 5.0 926 0.621 100 8.9 LOS A 5.9 152.1 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 575 5.0 0.621 8.9 LOS A 5.9 152.1
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 4 5.0 495 0.008 100 10.0 LOS A 0.0 1.2 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.008 10.0 LOS A 0.0 1.2
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 1041 5.0 1310 0.795 100 6.0 LOS A 12.1 314.7 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1041 5.0 0.795 6.0 LOS A 12.1 314.7
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 239 5.0 688 0.348 100 13.8 LOS B 2.3 58.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 239 5.0 0.348 13.8 LOS B 2.3 58.8
Intersection 1859 5.0 0.795 7.9 LOS A 12.1 314.7
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 76 497 1 575 5.0 926 0.621 100 NA NA
Approach 76 497 1 575 5.0 0.621
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 4 5.0 495 0.008 100 NA NA

LANE SUMMARY
W’ Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1OI 575 5.0 926 0.621 100 8.9 LOS A 5.9 152.1 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 575 5.0 0.621 8.9 LOS A 5.9 152.1
NorthEast: Private Dr (
Lane 1OI 4 5.0 495 0.008 100 10.0 LOS A 0.0 1.2 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.008 10.0 LOS A 0.0 1.2
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33) (‘
Lane 1OI 1041 5.0 1310 0.795 100 6.0 LOS A 12.1 314.7 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1041 5.0 0.795 6.0 LOS A 12.1 314.7
SouthWest:DerrickAve(SR33) (‘
Lane 1OI 239 5.0 688 0.348 100 13.8 LOS B 2.3 58.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 239 5.0 0.348 13.8 LOS B 2.3 58.8
Intersection 1859 5.0 0.795 7.9 LOS A 12.1 314.7 B
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and WCratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (Wenot used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach —SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180) Lane1 76 497 1 575 5.0 926 0.621 100 NA NA |
Approach 76 497 1 575 5.0 0.621
NorthEast: Private Dr
|Lane1 1 1 1 4 5.0 495 0.008 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.008
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 108 1 474 458 1041 5.0 1310 0.795 100 NA NA
Approach 108 1 474 458 1041 5.0 0.795
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 9 214 1 14 239 5.0 688 0.348 100 NA NA
Approach 9 214 1 14 239 5.0 0.348
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1859 5.0 0.795
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:15 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.008 I
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1 108 1 474 458 1041 5.0 1310 0.795 100 NA NA |
Approach 108 1 474 458 1041 5.0 0.795 I
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 9 214 1 14 239 5.0 688 0.348 100 NA NA
Approach 9 214 1 14 239 5.0 0.348
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1859 5.0 0.795
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied %
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:15 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.9
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 103 4 24 67 129 3 30 15 152 38 13
Future Vol, veh/h 8 103 4 24 67 129 3 30 15 152 38 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 11 137 5 32 89 172 4 40 20 203 51 17
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.9 11 9 11.9

HCM LOSA B A B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 6% 7% 11% 75%
Vol Thru, % 63% 90% 30% 19%
Vol Right, % 31% 3% 59% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 48 115 220 203
LT Vol 3 8 24 152
Through Vol 30 103 67 38
RT Vol 15 4 129 13
Lane Flow Rate 64 153 293 271
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.096 0.227 0.395 0.402
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.408 5.327 4.848 5.344
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 662 675 748 674
Service Time 3.444 3.358 2.848 3.37
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.097 0.227 0.392 0.402
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9 9.9 11 11.9
HCM Lane LOS AABB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.9 1.9 1.9
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 10.9
‘rsectionLOS B ‘ —LaneConfigurations
Efrc Vol veh/h " 8 103 4 24 67 129 3 30 15 152 38- FutureVol veh/h 8 103 4 24 67 129 3 30 15 152 38 13 lk HourFactor ——-— HeavyVehicles,%
'mt Flow _—"'I1 137 5 9"85—1'72' 40- 20 203 551-5
Number of Lanes 0 1 O 3O 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 —OpposingApproach WB EB SB NB lbposingLanes 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - ConflictingApproachLeft SB NB EB WB InflictingLanesLeft — ConflictingApproachRight NB SB WB EB IflictingLanesRight _ — HCMControlDelay,s/veh 9.9 11 9 11.9 lfLOS m —VolLeft,% 6% 7% 11% 75%
'I'hru,% - 63% 90% 30% 19% — VolRight,% 31% 3% 59% 6%
.Control—4p_ Stop Stop St—
TrafficVolbyLane 115 220 203
m _4 8— 24 1—
ThroughVol 30103 67
-0| _4 43129 8—
LaneFlowRate 153 293
ImetryGrp —61 1 1 71—
reeofUtil(X) 0.096 0.227 0.395 0.402
jwal_08 5-327 4-848 5-3—
Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
—662 675 748 67—
Service Time 3.444 3.358 2.848 3.37
mLaneVICRafi—7 0227 0-392 _
HCMControlDelay,s/veh 9.9 11 11.9
HCM95th-tileO 0.3 0.9 1.9 1.9
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 94 138 154 186 334 53
Future Vol, veh/h 94 138 154 186 334 53
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 35 35 35 0 0 35
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 125 184 205 248 445 71
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1174 515 551 0 - 0
Stage 1 480 -----
Stage 2 694 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 209 554 1004 - - -
Stage 1 616 -----
Stage 2 490 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 154 517 970 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 154 -----
Stage 1 469 -----
Stage 2 474 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 45.03 4.39 0

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 970 - 154 517 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.212 - 0.814 0.356 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 - 88 15.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - 5.3 1.6 - -
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 12.5
LaneConfigurations‘l'i i‘If ‘lfi 1|- + if
'6fficV0Lveh/h94 138154186334 53 — FutureVol,veh/h 94 138 154 186 334 53 InflictingPeds.#/hr 35 35 35 0 0 — SignControl Stop Stop Free Free Free Free [Channelized.uon_ StorageLength 590 O O - - O
m inMedianStorage_
Grade,% O - - 0 O - ‘Hour Factor — HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 ITFIOW "'12?184205 2_
ConflictingFlow All 1174 515 551 O - 0
1 Stage1 480 - - - —
Stage2 694 - - - - - [cal Hdwy 6.136.2—
CriticalHdwyStg1 5.45 - - - - _
lcaIHdWStgz 5-45 -— Follow-upHdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - - ICap-1Maneuver 2D55— Stage1 616 - - - - - I Stage2 4_
Platoonblocked,% - .Cap-1Maneuver — MovCap-2Maneuver 154 - — - - _ 'Stage 1 _
Stage2 474 - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 45.03 4.39 0

HCMLOS E
L
lapacity(veh/h) 97o - 154 517 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.212 - 0.814 0.356 KM Ct” D'Y(S/V) 9-7 'AA 88 153—
HCMLaneLOS A - F C - -
Synchro 12 Report
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 38 33 51 94 36
Future Vol, veh/h 10 38 33 51 94 36
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 41 36 55 102 39
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 91 0 - 0 127 64
Stage 1 - - - - 64 -
Stage 2 - - - - 63 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - - 868 1001
Stage 1 - - - - 959 -
Stage 2 - - - - 960 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - - 862 1001
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 862 -
Stage 1 - - - - 952 -
Stage 2 - - - - 960 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.54 0 9.77

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 375 - - - 896
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - - 0.158
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.4 0 - - 9.8
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.6
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 5.1
LaneConfigurations 4‘ ‘h V
'afficVOLWeh/h10 38 33 51 94 36 — FutureVol,veh/h 10 38 33 51 94 36 InflictingPedsfi/hrl-J<. 0A 0 .
0—
SignControl Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
[Channelized _
StorageLength - - - - O - m inMedianStora—
Grade,% - O O - O - ‘Hour Facto—
HeavyVehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
IWFIOW ‘W 41 36‘55 102_
ConflictingFlow All 91 O - 0 127 64 ' Stage1
StageZ
-
- - - - -'l'- - 64 63 -- —
[cal Hdwy — CriticalHdwyStg1 - - - - 5.42 -
lcal HdwyStg2
Follow-upHdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
ICap—1Maneuver — Stage1 - - - - 959 - I Stage2 — Platoonblocked,% - - _ .Cap-1Maneuve—
MovCap-2Maneuver - - - - 862 -
'Stage1 _
Stage2 - - - - 960 - CtrlDly,s/v 1.54 o 9.77

HCMLOS A
I
lapacity(veh/h) 375 - - - 896
HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.007 - - - 0.158
KM cmW(S/V) -, 7-4 —0—-—'— ' 9-8 — HCMLaneLOS A A - - A Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-AM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 217 39 10 94 150 21 20 13 272 52 15 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 217 39 10 94 150 21 20 13 272 52 15 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 310 55 14 134 171 30 29 13 389 74 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 42 600 105 31 344 297 59 247 195 476 685 558 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2901 506 1725 1721 1486 1725 1811 1429 1725 1811 1477 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 20 182 183 14 134 171 30 29 13 389 74 1 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1687 1725 1721 1486 1725 1811 1429 1725 1811 1477 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 4.6 4.7 0.4 3.3 5.1 0.8 0.7 0.4 10.3 1.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 4.6 4.7 0.4 3.3 5.1 0.8 0.7 0.4 10.3 1.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 42 356 349 31 344 297 59 247 195 476 685 558 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.51 0.53 0.46 0.39 0.58 0.51 0.12 0.07 0.82 0.11 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 282 741 727 246 706 610 246 817 645 1479 2111 1721 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.6 17.2 17.3 23.8 17.0 17.7 23.3 18.6 18.4 16.6 9.9 9.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.2 1.1 1.2 10.3 0.7 1.8 6.6 0.2 0.1 3.5 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.2 1.2 1.7 0.4 0.3 0.1 4.0 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 31.8 18.4 18.5 34.2 17.7 19.5 29.9 18.8 18.6 20.1 9.9 9.5 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 385 319 72 464
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.1 19.4 23.4 18.5
Approach LOS B B C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.5 11.6 4.9 15.0 5.7 23.4 5.2 14.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 42.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 7.0 57.1 8.0 20.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 2.7 2.4 6.7 2.8 3.3 2.6 7.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.2
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-AM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tx’\>$ J
Lane —Configurations ‘1 +12) ‘1 +12). ‘1 + F ‘1 + F
Effie Volume(veh/h) 14 217 39 1O 94 150 21 20 13 272 52 - FutureVolume(veh/h) 14 217 39 1O 94 150 21 20 13 272 52 15 [ial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0 O 0 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) .95 . .97 . .93 .00
ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No; ‘ ‘ No‘ t No' : 5
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 [Flow Rate,veh/h _310 ‘ 55.14.134 ‘ 171. 30. 29. 13‘389 : 74- PeakHourFactor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 [cent HeavyVeh,-6 6 6I 6 _ 6 6 67 6 6 6 6-
Cap,veh/h 42 600 105 31 344 297 59 247 195 476 685 558
live OnGreen "' ‘DZ 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.38 SatFlow,veh/h 1725 2901 506 1725 1721 1486 1725 1811 1429 1725 1811 1477 inVqme(v),veh/h" ‘ 20 182 183 14 134 171 30 29 13 389 74 GrpSatFIow(s),veh/h/In1725 1721 1687 1725 1721 1486 1725 1811 1429 1725 1811 1477 [Serve(g_s),s ‘06 4.6 4.7 0.4 3.3 5.1 0.8 0.7 0.4 10.3 1.3- CycleQ Clear(g_c),s 0.6 4.6 4.7 0.4 3.3 5.1 0.8 0.7 0.4 10.3 1.3 0.0 [p InLane m _o.30 1.00a _1.00 1.003 ;1.00 1.00 _ - LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 42 356 349 31 344 297 59 247 195 476 685 558 I) Ratio(X) .-8 0.51 0.53 0.46 0.39 0.58 0.51: 0.12 —0.07 0.82 0.11 AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 282 741 727 246 706 610 246 817 645 1479 2111 1721 [M PlatoonRatio -0 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 liform Delay (d),s/veh .517 2.173 23.8 _.17ol17.7- 23.3 _18.6 _18.4 -166 -99- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 21.1 1.2 10.3 0.7 0.2 3.5 0.1 0.0
lial Q
Delay(d3)s/vehh- .1 (1.0 (21.02 0.0 0.0 0-0-0- 0.0 _9- - %i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.3 1.7 1 .7 1.7 .3 O.O lsigMovementDelay,slvehl‘ - ‘0 2..“ 4L I OH... ..4-
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 31.8 18.4 18.5 34.2 17.7 19.5 29.9 18.8 18.6 20.1 .5 lGrpLOS —'
ApproachVol,veh/h 385 7 319 72 464
EproachDelay,s/veh — 19.1_ ‘— 19.4 ' 23.4 — 18
ApproachLOS B B C B
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 17.5 11.6 4.9 15.0 5.7 23.4 5.2 14.7 IIange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 42.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 7.0 57.1 8.0 20.1 FxQCIearTime(g_c+l1),s 12.3 2.7— 2.4i6.7— 2.8 3.3 2.6_ GreenExtTime(p_c), s 1.2 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.5
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 19.2
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-AM Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 20 366 14 348 30 29 19 389 74 21
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.48 0.07 0.41 0.14 0.13 0.06 0.65 0.08 0.03 Control Delay (s/veh) 29.9 21.8 30.4 10.5 30.6 29.4 0.4 22.1 11.7 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 29.9 21.8 30.4 10.5 30.6 29.4 0.4 22.1 11.7 0.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 46 4 16 8 8 0 94 8 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 98 20 41 34 32 0 192 41 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2611 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 266 1370 233 1318 233 774 698 1368 1656 1340 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.27 0.06 0.26 0.13 0.04 0.03 0.28 0.04 0.02 Intersection Summary
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-AM Queues 02/12/2026
f—rr*—*\ TIN»; J
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 20 366 14 348 30 29 19 389 74 21
'Ratio 0.10 0.48 0.07 0.41 0.14 0.13 0.06 0.65 0.08 0.03 _ ControlDelay(s/veh) 29.9 21.8 30.4 10.5 30.6 29.4 0.4 22.1 11.7 0.1 [we Delay '2: 0 0.0 _ 0.0i 0.0; 0.0: 0.0 0.0‘ 0.0 0.

TotalDelay(s/veh) 29.9 21.8 30.4 10.5 30.6 29.4 0.4 22.1 11.7 0.1 leue Length50th(ft) . 46‘ 1 u E
QueueLength95th(ft) 25 98 20 41 34 32 O 192 41 O
lernalLinkDist(ft) 1‘ 5
TurnBayLength(ft) 100 140 565 335
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O O O
muced v/cRatio ‘8 0.27 0.06 0.26 0.13 0.04 0.03 0.28 0.04 0.02— Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 36.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113
Future Vol, veh/h 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 144 1 224 1 1 1 258 311 3 7 292 157
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1233 1235 390 1155 1312 333 459 0 0 324 0 0 Stage 1 394 394 - 839 839 -------
Stage 2 838 841 - 316 473 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 150 172 645 169 154 696 1071 - - 1203 - - Stage 1 619 595 - 352 373 -------
Stage 2 352 372 - 682 549 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 101 118 633 74 106 682 1061 - - 1191 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 101 118 - 74 106 -------
Stage 1 608 585 - 246 260 -------
Stage 2 244 260 - 433 539 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 131.37 35.24 4.28 0.12

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 811 - - 101 118 633 123 26 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.243 - - 1.424 0.012 0.353 0.034 0.006 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.5 0 -$ 314.3 35.9 13.8 35.2 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - F EBEAA -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - - 10.5 0 1.6 0.1 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
IntDelay,s/veh 36.5
LaneConfigurations 1"i 1" iIlr 4!) e111 e111
'afficVol,veh/h 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113 _ FutureVoI,veh/h 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113 InflictingPedsfl/hr 4- 0 11u1_110 . Oil-Ill _
SignControl Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free lChannelized ' - StorageLength 140 500
m InMedianStorag— Grade,%
‘Hour Factor — HeavyVehicles,% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Imw ‘12?” 1724 14-1-—1 w 111 5 r 29_
ConflictingFIOWAII 1233 1235 390 1155 1312 333 459 0 0 324 O O 'Stage1 StageZ 838 841 394 394- - 839 316 473
839- - - - -
- -—
Icamdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 658 628—
CriticalHdwyStg1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 -
lcalHdSt 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - Follow-upHdwy 3.572 4.0723.372 3.572 4.0723.372 2.272 - -2.272 - leap-1Maneuver150172645169154 Stage1 619 595 - 352 373 - I StageZ 352372...
- 682549 — Platoonblocked,%
.Cap-1Maneuver ~10111m 74:106—
MovCap-ZManeuver ~101 118 - 74 106
'Stage1 '6
StageZ 244 260 - 433 539 - - - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 131.37 35.24 4.28 0.12

HCMLOS F E
n
lapacity(veh/h) 811 - - 101 118 633 123 26 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.243 - - 1.424 0.0120.353 0.0340.006 - - ICMCtrIDIy(s/v) 9.5 0 $314.3 35.9 13.8 35.2 8 0 - HCMLaneLOS A A - F E B E A A - ICM95th%ti|eQ(veh) 1 - - 10.5 o 1.6 0.1 0 - - - mlume exceedscapacity $:Delayexceeds300$ - +: ComputationNotDefined *: All major volumein platoon Synchro 12 Report

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 2:00:12 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

SITE LAYOUT
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 2:00:12 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 505 2.0 933 0.541 100 7.4 LOS A 4.3 109.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 505 2.0 0.541 7.4 LOS A 4.3 109.6
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 3 2.0 575 0.005 100 8.8 LOS A 0.0 0.8 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.005 8.8 LOS A 0.0 0.8
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 942 2.0 1571 0.599 100 4.8 LOS A 6.5 166.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 942 2.0 0.599 4.8 LOS A 6.5 166.2
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 291 2.0 822 0.354 100 13.1 LOS B 2.1 53.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 291 2.0 0.354 13.1 LOS B 2.1 53.6
Intersection 1741 2.0 0.599 7.0 LOS A 6.5 166.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 16 489 1 505 2.0 933 0.541 100 NA NA
Approach 16 489 1 505 2.0 0.541
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 3 2.0 575 0.005 100 NA NA

LANE SUMMARY
W’ Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1OI 505 2.0 933 0.541 100 7.4 LOS A 4.3 109.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 505 2.0 0.541 7.4 LOS A 4.3 109.6
NorthEast: Private Dr (
Lane 1OI 3 2.0 575 0.005 100 8.8 LOS A 0.0 0.8 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.005 8.8 LOS A 0.0 0.8
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33) (‘
Lane 1OI 942 2.0 1571 0.599 100 4.8 LOS A 6.5 166.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 942 2.0 0.599 4.8 LOS A 6.5 166.2
SouthWest:DerrickAve(SR33) (‘
Lane 1OI 291 2.0 822 0.354 100 13.1 LOS B 2.1 53.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 291 2.0 0.354 13.1 LOS B 2.1 53.6
Intersection 1741 2.0 0.599 7.0 LOS A 6.5 166.2 B
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and WCratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (Wenot used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach —SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180) Lane1 16 489 1 505 2.0 933 0.541 100 NA NA |
Approach 16 489 1 505 2.0 0.541
NorthEast: Private Dr
|Lane1 1 1 1 3 2.0 575 0.005 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.005
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 96 1 453 392 942 2.0 1571 0.599 100 NA NA
Approach 96 1 453 392 942 2.0 0.599
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 1 265 1 24 291 2.0 822 0.354 100 NA NA
Approach 1 265 1 24 291 2.0 0.354
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1741 2.0 0.599
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:18 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.005 I
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1 96 1 453 392 942 2.0 1571 0.599 100 NA NA |
Approach 96 1 453 392 942 2.0 0.599 I
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 1 265 1 24 291 2.0 822 0.354 100 NA NA
Approach 1 265 1 24 291 2.0 0.354
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1741 2.0 0.599
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied %
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:18 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 67 1 9 115 159 1 22 9 93 30 3
Future Vol, veh/h 3 67 1 9 115 159 1 22 9 93 30 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 3 71 1 9 121 167 1 23 9 98 32 3
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.3 9.4 8.1 9.1

HCM LOSA A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 4% 3% 74%
Vol Thru, % 69% 94% 41% 24%
Vol Right, % 28% 1% 56% 2%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 32 71 283 126
LT Vol 1 3 9 93
Through Vol 22 67 115 30
RT Vol 9 1 159 3
Lane Flow Rate 34 75 298 133
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.045 0.098 0.345 0.183
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.818 4.719 4.165 4.977
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 741 759 864 720
Service Time 2.86 2.751 2.186 3.013
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 0.099 0.345 0.185
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.1 8.3 9.4 9.1
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.3 1.5 0.7
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 9.1
‘rsectionLOS A ‘ —LaneConfigurations ($1 41: 4‘;
Effie Vol,veh/h ‘I 3 67 1 9 115 159 1 22 9 93 30- FutureVol,veh/h 3 67 1 9 115 159 1 22 9 93 30 .k HourFactor 5 1 La
HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
[mt Flow W21 —"1'67'1 23 9—98 — 32-
NumberofLanes 0 1 O O 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 —OpposingApproach WB EB SB NB lbposingLanes 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - ConflictingApproachLeft SB NB EB WB InflictingLanesLeft — ConflictingApproachRight NB SB WB EB IflictingLanesRight ._ — HCMControlDelay,s/veh 8.3 9.4 8.1 9.1 [nos m —VolLeft,% 3% 4% 3% 74%
'I'hru,% - 69% 94% 41% 24% — VolRight,% 28% 1% 56% 2%
.Control—28top - Stop St—
TrafficVolby Lane 71 283 126
m _26 3I 9 — ThroughVol 22 115 30
.ol _4 1'59 — LaneFlowRate 298 133
ImetryGrp —4 1 1 — reeofUtil(X) 0.045 0.098 0.345 0.183 Max—I8 4-719 4-165 4-9—
Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
—41 759 864 72—
ServiceTime 2.86 2.751 2.186 3.013
m LaneVICRafi—L 00990345 _
HCMControlDelay,s/veh 8.3 9.4 9.1
HCM95th-tileQ 0.1 0.3 1.5 0.7
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 92 162 287 311 94
Future Vol, veh/h 52 92 162 287 311 94
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 4 4 0 0 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 56 99 174 309 334 101
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 999 342 439 0 - 0
Stage 1 338 -----
Stage 2 661 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 266 693 1105 - - -
Stage 1 715 -----
Stage 2 508 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 222 688 1100 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 222 -----
Stage 1 600 -----
Stage 2 506 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 16.68 3.21 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1100 - 222 688 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.158 - 0.251 0.144 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.9 - 26.5 11.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 1 0.5 - -
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
IntDelay,s/veh 3.8
LaneConfigurations ‘1 fl' ‘lfi 1|- + if
'6fficV0Lveh/h52 92 162287311 94 — FutureVol,veh/h 52 92 162 287 311 94 InflictingPedsfi/hr A; 4 4 0 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
IChannelized* _
StorageLength 590 O O - - O
m inMedianStorage_
Grade,% O - - 0 O - ‘Hour Factor — HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 ”Flow hr 99‘174 “309 334
ConflictingFlow All 999 342 439 O - 0
I Stage1 338 — - - — StageZ 661 - - - - - .cal Hdwy 645' 6.25 CriticalHdwyStg 1 5.45 - - lcaIHdWStgz 5-45 -— Follow-upHdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - - ICap-1Maneuver 2‘69— Stage1 715 - - - - - Sta 32 50 - I g _
Platoonblocked,% - .Cap-1Maneuver — MovCap-2Maneuver 222 - — - - _ 'Stage 1 ‘—
Stage2 506 - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 16.68 3.21 o

HCMLOS C
I
lapacity(veh/h) 1100 - 222688 - -
HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.158 - 0.251 0.144
KM Ct” DIY(3”) _.___8-9 ' 26-5 11L—
HCMLaneLOS A - D B - -
Synchro 12 Report
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 76 30 153 93 21
Future Vol, veh/h 43 76 30 153 93 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 47 83 33 166 101 23
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 199 0 - 0 292 116
Stage 1 - - - - 116 -
Stage 2 - - - - 176 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1373 - - - 699 937
Stage 1 - - - - 909 -
Stage 2 - - - - 854 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1373 - - - 674 937
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 674 -
Stage 1 - - - - 877 -
Stage 2 - - - - 854 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.79 0 11.13

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 650 - - - 711
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - - - 0.174
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.7 0 - - 11.1
HCM Lane LOS A A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.6
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
IntDelay,s/veh 3.8
LaneConfigurations 4‘ 11; Y
'afficVoLveh/h43 76 30 153 93 21 — FutureVol,veh/h 43 76 30 153 93 21 InflictingPeds,#/hr1-0 0 ¢ 0 0—
SignControl Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
IChannelized _
StorageLength - - - - O - m inMedianStora—
Grade,% - O O - O - ‘Hour Fem.—
HeavyVehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
mFIow 4r as 33 m 1m_
ConflictingFlow All 199 0 - O 292 116
I Stage1 - - l'- - 116 - — StageZ - - - - 176 - [cal Hdwy — CriticalHdwyStg1 - - - - 5.42 - lcal HdwyStg2
Follow-upHdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
ICap—1Maneuver — Stage1 - - - - 909 - I Stage2 — Platoonblocked,% - - _ .Cap-1Maneuve—
MovCap-2Maneuver - - - - 674 -
'Stage1 _
Stage2 - - - - 854 -
CtrlDly,S/V 2.79 0 11.13

HCMLOS B
I
lapacity(veh/h) 650 - - - 711
HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.034 - - - 0.174
KM cmW(S/V) 7-7 —O—-'—-' 11-1 _ HCMLaneLOS A A - - B
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-PM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 44 182 43 19 210 153 59 130 65 160 53 41 Future Volume (veh/h) 44 182 43 19 210 153 59 130 65 160 53 41 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 219 51 23 253 154 71 157 62 193 64 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 89 741 167 47 505 293 107 378 290 252 531 416 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2740 618 1725 2050 1191 1725 1811 1387 1725 1811 1421 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 135 135 23 210 197 71 157 62 193 64 37 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1637 1725 1721 1521 1725 1811 1387 1725 1811 1421 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 3.2 3.4 0.7 5.4 5.7 2.1 3.9 1.9 5.5 1.3 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 3.2 3.4 0.7 5.4 5.7 2.1 3.9 1.9 5.5 1.3 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 89 466 443 47 424 374 107 378 290 252 531 416 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.29 0.30 0.49 0.50 0.53 0.66 0.41 0.21 0.76 0.12 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 538 976 929 269 708 626 235 992 760 908 1698 1332 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.8 14.8 14.9 24.6 16.6 16.7 23.5 17.6 16.8 21.1 13.3 13.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.2 0.3 0.4 7.7 0.9 1.1 6.9 0.7 0.4 4.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 1.1 1.2 0.4 2.0 1.9 1.0 1.5 0.6 2.4 0.5 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 30.0 15.1 15.3 32.3 17.5 17.9 30.4 18.3 17.2 25.8 13.4 13.2 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 323 430 290 294
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.6 18.5 21.0 21.5
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.5 15.6 5.4 18.8 7.2 19.9 6.7 17.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 28.1 8.0 29.1 7.0 48.1 16.0 21.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.5 5.9 2.7 5.4 4.1 3.3 3.5 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 2.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.5
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-PM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tx’\>i J
Lane —Configurations ‘1 +12) ‘1 +12). ‘1 + F ‘1 + F
Effie Volume(veh/h) 44 182 43 19 210 153 59 130 65 160 53 FutureVolume(veh/h) 44 182 43 19 210 153 59 130 65 160 53 41 [ial Q(Qb),veh 0 o o o r 0] 0 o: 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) .92 .00 .95 D.00] .90 .00
ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No: 5 : No: : I No: : :

AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 [Flow Rate,veh/h‘- 219‘ 51- 23; 253: 154. 71‘ 157; 62‘ 193a 64- PeakHourFactor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 [cent HeavyVeh,-6 6 6 _ 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6-
Cap,veh/h 89 741 167 47 505 293 107 378 290 252 531 416 live OnGreen "' ‘05 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.29 S_atFlow,veh/h 1725 2740 618 1725 2050 1191 1725 1811 1387 1725 1811 1421 lDVqme(v),veh/h".53 135 135 23 210 197 71 157 62 193 64 GrpSatFlow(s),veh/h/In1725 1721 1637 1725 1721 1521 1725 1811 1387 1725 1811 1421 [Serve(g_s),s U .5 3.2 3.4 0.7 5.4 5.7 2.1 3.9 1.9 5.5 1.3- CycleQ Clear(g_c),s 1.5 3.2 3.4 0.7 5.4 5.7 2.1 3.9 1.9 5.5 1.3 1.0 [p InLane m 0.38 1.00a _ 0.78 1.00a _1.00 1.00: - LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 89 466 443 47 424 374 107 378 290 252 531 416 I) Ratio(X) .‘9 0.29 0.30 0.49 0.50 0.53 0.66 0.41 0.21 0.76 0.12 AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 538 976 929 269 708 626 235 992 760 908 1698 1332 [M PlatoonRatio -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 liform Delay (d),s/veh .63 14.8 _14.9 24.6 _16.6 _.167 _23.5 _.176 _16.8 _.211_13.3- IncrDelay (d2), s/veh 7.7 1.1 O.7 4.8 0.1 0.1
lial QDeIay<d3),s/veh —9_9_0 0-9D00-0 (1.00.0 0.0-
%i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In0.7 0.3
lsig.MovementDelay,s/veh-: ‘2- 4.. 0.. 9- OI 50- 6.. 40. 5- LnGrpDelay(d),s/veh 30.0 15.1 15.3 32.3 17.5 17.9 30.4 18.3 17.2 25.8 13.4 13.2 lGrpLOS _-
ApproachVol,veh/h 323 430 - 290 294
EproachDelay,s/veh — 17.6 — 18.5— ‘— 21.0 - 21
ApproachLOS B B C C
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 11.5 15.6 5.4 18.8 7.2 19.9 6.7 17.5 Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 27.0 28.1 8.0 29.1 7.0 48.1 16.0 21.1 FxQCIearTime(g_c+l1),s 7.5 5.9 2.7 5.4 4.1 3.3 35—77— GreenExtTime(p_c), s 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 2.1
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 19.5
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-PM Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 271 23 437 71 157 78 193 64 49 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.31 0.12 0.57 0.33 0.44 0.19 0.51 0.10 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 32.1 19.2 33.7 18.7 36.4 29.7 1.0 29.1 17.8 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 32.1 19.2 33.7 18.7 36.4 29.7 1.0 29.1 17.8 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 32 8 53 26 55 0 67 18 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 85 34 108 78 128 0 148 48 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2599 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 508 1769 254 1310 222 940 793 858 1438 1114 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.15 0.09 0.33 0.32 0.17 0.10 0.22 0.04 0.04 Intersection Summary
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33)
Queues
f—rr‘—*\ —
Near-Term With Project-PM
TINL «/
02/12/2026

0.0I 0.0
64 49

0.10 0.09 _ 17.8 0.3

17.8 0.3
48 0
[86Capacity(vph) _
LaneGroupFlow(vph) 53 271 23 437 71
'Ratio 0.23 0.31 0.12 0.57 0.33
ControlDelay(s/veh) 32.1 19.2 33.7 18.7 36.4
[we Delay ”I 0.0] 0.0a 0.0 i 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 32.1 19.2 33.7 18.7 36.4
leue Length50th(ft) 2‘ 53 , 26
QueueLength95th(ft) 59 85 34 108 78
lernalLinkDist(ft) '9] 5
TurnBayLength(ft) 100 140 565
StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O
lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O
muced v/cRatio ‘0 0.15 0.09 0.33 0.32
0 0
0 0 0-04 0-0_
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 10.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66
Future Vol, veh/h 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 86 1 216 1 1 4 232 390 2 3 290 71
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1208 1209 346 1173 1244 411 371 0 0 402 0 0 Stage 1 342 342 - 866 866 -------
Stage 2 865 867 - 307 378 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 156 178 684 164 170 628 1155 - - 1124 - - Stage 1 661 627 - 340 362 -------
Stage 2 340 362 - 690 605 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 111 129 671 80 123 616 1144 - - 1114 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 111 129 - 80 123 -------
Stage 1 652 619 - 249 266 -------
Stage 2 247 265 - 461 597 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 38.95 21.77 3.33 0.07

HCM LOS E C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 668 - - 111 129 671 221 15 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.203 - - 0.775 0.008 0.322 0.029 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.9 0 - 104.5 33.2 12.9 21.8 8.2 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - F D B C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - 4.3 0 1.4 0.1 0 - -
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
IntDelay,s/veh 10.8
LaneConfigurations 1"i 1" iIlr 4!) e111 e111
'afficVol,veh/h 8O 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66 _ FutureVol,veh/h 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66 lnflictingPedsfi/hr 4'- 0 mum-fl. 10;
Oil—1.- 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free lChannelized ' - StorageLength 140 500
m InMedianStora9_
Grade,%
‘Hour Factor — HeavyVehicles,% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Imw W6~1 1 4 232 ”390* z 3 29_
ConflictingFIOWAII 1208 1209 346 1173 1244 411 371 0 0 402 O O 'Stage1 StageZ 865 867 342 342-
- 866 307 378
866- - - - -
- -—
IcaIHdwy 7-18 6-58 6-28 7-18 6-58 628—
CriticalHdwyStg1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 -
lcalHdSt 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - Follow-upHdwy 3.572 4.0723.372 3.572 4.0723.372 2.272 - -2.272 - leap-1Maneuver156178684164170.62— Stage1 661 627 - 340 362 - I StageZ 340362... 690605 — Platoonblocked,% .Cap-1Maneuver 111M123—
MovCap-2Maneuver 111 123 -
'Stage1 “Ta-UH”!—
Stage2 247 265 - 461 597 - - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 38.95 21.77 3.33 0.07

HCMLOS E C
L
lapacity(veh/h) 668 - - 111 129 671 221 15 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.203 - - 0.775 0.008 0.322 0.029 0.003 [M CtrlDly(s/v) 8.9 O A - 104.5 33.2 12.9 21.8 8.24___()_— HCMLaneLOS A A - F D B C A A -
Synchro 12 Report

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 2:00:35 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

SITE LAYOUT
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 2:00:35 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 638 5.0 961 0.663 100 9.4 LOS A 7.0 181.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 638 5.0 0.663 9.4 LOS A 7.0 181.6
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 4 5.0 471 0.007 100 10.9 LOS B 0.0 1.2 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.007 10.9 LOS B 0.0 1.2
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 1138 5.0 1342 0.848 100 6.3 LOS A 15.0 389.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1138 5.0 0.848 6.3 LOS A 15.0 389.8
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 260 5.0 675 0.385 100 14.0 LOS B 2.7 70.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 260 5.0 0.385 14.0 LOS B 2.7 70.6
Intersection 2039 5.0 0.848 8.3 LOS A 15.0 389.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 85 552 1 638 5.0 961 0.663 100 NA NA
Approach 85 552 1 638 5.0 0.663
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 4 5.0 471 0.007 100 NA NA

LANE SUMMARY
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1OI 638 5.0 961 0.663 100 9.4 LOS A 7.0 181.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 638 5.0 0.663 9.4 LOS A 7.0 181.6
NorthEast: Private Dr (
Lane 1OI 4 5.0 471 0.007 100 10.9 LOS B 0.0 1.2 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.007 10.9 LOS B 0.0 1.2
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33) (‘
Lane 1OI 1138 5.0 1342 0.848 100 6.3 LOS A 15.0 389.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1138 5.0 0.848 6.3 LOS A 15.0 389.8
SouthWest:DerrickAve(SR33) (‘
Lane 1OI 260 5.0 675 0.385 100 14.0 LOS B 2.7 70.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 260 5.0 0.385 14.0 LOS B 2.7 70.6
Intersection 2039 5.0 0.848 8.3 LOS A 15.0 389.8 B
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and WCratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (Wenot used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach —SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180) Lane1 85 552 1 638 5.0 9610.663 100 NA NA |
Approach 85 552 1 638 5.0 0.663
NorthEast: Private Dr
|Lane1 1 1 1 4 5.0 471 0.007 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.007
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 111 1 524 502 1138 5.0 1342 0.848 100 NA NA
Approach 111 1 524 502 1138 5.0 0.848
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 11 232 1 16 260 5.0 675 0.385 100 NA NA
Approach 11 232 1 16 260 5.0 0.385
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 2039 5.0 0.848
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:10:50 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.007 I
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 111 1 524 502 1138 5.0 1342 0.848 100 NA NA |
Approach 111 1 524 502 1138 5.0 0.848 I
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 11 232 1 16 260 5.0 675 0.385 100 NA NA
Approach 11 232 1 16 260 5.0 0.385
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 2039 5.0 0.848
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied %
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:10:50 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th AWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 13
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 105 5 30 76 159 4 37 19 186 47 16
Future Vol, veh/h 9 105 5 30 76 159 4 37 19 186 47 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 12 140 7 40 101 212 5 49 25 248 63 21
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.7 13.3 9.7 14.6

HCM LOSB B A B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 7% 8% 11% 75%
Vol Thru, % 62% 88% 29% 19%
Vol Right, % 32% 4% 60% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 60 119 265 249
LT Vol 4 9 30 186
Through Vol 37 105 76 47
RT Vol 19 5 159 16
Lane Flow Rate 80 159 353 332
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.129 0.253 0.502 0.518
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.802 5.734 5.118 5.612
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 615 624 703 641
Service Time 3.864 3.79 3.164 3.656
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.13 0.255 0.502 0.518
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.7 10.7 13.3 14.6
HCM Lane LOS ABBB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 1 2.8 3
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th AWSC 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 13
‘rsectionLOS B ‘ —LaneConfigurations
Efrc Vol veh/h ‘I 9 105 5 30 76 159 4 37 19 186 47- FutureVol veh/h 9 105 5 30 76 159 4 37 19 186 47 16 lk HourFactor —_-5_-5
HeavyVehicles,%
'mt Flow W118" 5‘710—701—712' 49' 25 248'63-5
NumberofLanes 0 1 O O 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 —OpposingApproach WB EB SB NB lbposingLanes 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - ConflictingApproachLeft SB NB EB WB InflictingLanesLeft — ConflictingApproachRight NB SB WB EB IflictingLanesRight — HCMControlDelay,s/veh 10.7 13.3 9.7 14.6 lfLOS ‘H—P— —VolLeft,% 7% 8% 11% 75%
'I'hru,% - 62% 88% 29% 19% — VolRight,% 32% 4% 60% 6%
.Control _p Stop Stop St—
TrafficVolby Lane 119 265 249
m —09 30 1—
ThroughVol 37 105
.01 —0 52159_
LaneFlowRate 159 353
ImetryGrp —81_ 1 1 2—
reeofUtil(X) 0.129 0.253 0.502 0.518
jwal_02 5-734 5-118 5-6—
Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
_15 624 703 64—
ServiceTime 3.864 3.79 3.164 3.656
m LaneVICRafi—L0 255 -0-5020-_
HCMControlDelay,s/veh 9.7 10.7 13.3 14.6
HCM95th-tileO 0.4 1 2.8 3
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 13.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 101 165 190 262 412 61
Future Vol, veh/h 101 165 190 262 412 61
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 35 35 35 0 0 35
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 115 188 216 298 468 69
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1268 538 573 0 - 0
Stage 1 503 -----
Stage 2 765 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 183 537 986 - - -
Stage 1 601 -----
Stage 2 454 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 133 502 953 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 133 -----
Stage 1 449 -----
Stage 2 439 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 51.61 4.15 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 953 - 133 502 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.227 - 0.866 0.373 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.9 - 109.2 16.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - 5.5 1.7 - -
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 13.1
LaneConfigurations‘l'i i‘If ‘lfi 1|- + if
'6fficV0Lveh/h101 165190262 412 61 — FutureVol,veh/h 101 165 190 262 412 61 InflictingPeds.#/hr 35 35 35 0 0 — SignControl Stop Stop Free Free Free Free IChanneIized auone_
StorageLength 590 O O - - O
m inMedianStorage._
Grade,% O - - 0 O - ‘Hour Factor — HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 ITFIOW ”5 188516 298_
ConflictingFlow All 1268 538 573 O - 0
1 Stage1 503 — - - —
Stage2 765 - - - - -
.cal Hdwy 6.45: 6.25
CriticalHdwyStg 1 5.45 - - lcaIHdWStgz 5-45 -— Follow-upHdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 ICap-1Maneuver 1_
Stage1 601 - - - - - I Stage2 4_
Platoonblocked,% - .Cap-1Maneuver — MovCap-2Maneuver 133 - — - - _ 'Stage 1 _
Stage2 439 - - - - - CtrlDly,S/V 51.61 4.15 0

HCMLOS F
I
lapacity(veh/h) 953 - 133 502 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.227 - 0.866 0.373 KM Ct” D'Y(SN) ___9-9 ' 109-2164—
HCMLaneLOS A - F C - -
Synchro 12 Report
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 176 377 92 88 106
Future Vol, veh/h 20 176 377 92 88 106
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 22 191 410 100 96 115
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 510 0 - 0 695 460
Stage 1 - - - - 460 -
Stage 2 - - - - 235 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1055 - - - 408 601
Stage 1 - - - - 636 -
Stage 2 - - - - 804 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1055 - - - 399 601
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 399 -
Stage 1 - - - - 621 -
Stage 2 - - - - 804 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.87 0 17.83

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 184 - - - 489
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.431
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.5 0 - - 17.8
HCM Lane LOS A A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 2.1
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 4.2
LaneConfigurations 4‘ 13! 1|‘I’If
'afficVOLVGh/h20 176377 92 88 106 — FutureVol,veh/h 20 176 377 92 88 106 InflictingPedsfi/hr .- 0 0 4 0 0 — SignControl Free Free Free Free Stop Stop lChannelized
StorageLength - - - - O - m inMedianStora—
Grade,% - O O - O - ‘Hour Factor—
HeavyVehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2
”Flow 191 10 100
ConflictingFIowAII 510 0 - O 695 460
' Stage1 - - 'I'- - 460 - — StageZ - - - - 235
[68' Hdwy —_
CriticalHdwyStg1 - - - - 5.42 - lcaIHd 8t —-42
Follow-upHdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
ICap—1Maneuver — Stage1 - - - - 636 - I Stage2 — Platoonblocked,% - - _ .Cap-1Maneuve—
MovCap-2Maneuver - - - - 399
'Stage1 _
Stage2 - - - - 804 -
CtrlDly,S/V 0.87 0 17.83

HCMLOS C
I
lapacity(veh/h) 184 - - - 489
HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.021 - - - 0.431
KM cmW(S/V) 8-5 L--—._&—
HCMLaneLOS A A - - C
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 66 233 48 23 236 192 95 158 21 341 139 147 Future Volume (veh/h) 66 233 48 23 236 192 95 158 21 341 139 147 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 265 44 26 268 175 108 180 19 388 158 134 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 103 713 116 51 425 267 140 299 238 459 634 516 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2938 479 1725 2001 1257 1725 1811 1442 1725 1811 1475 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 153 156 26 229 214 108 180 19 388 158 134 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1696 1725 1721 1538 1725 1811 1442 1725 1811 1475 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 4.4 4.6 0.9 7.2 7.6 3.7 5.5 0.7 12.8 3.7 3.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 4.4 4.6 0.9 7.2 7.6 3.7 5.5 0.7 12.8 3.7 3.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 103 418 412 51 366 327 140 299 238 459 634 516 V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.37 0.38 0.51 0.63 0.66 0.77 0.60 0.08 0.85 0.25 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 305 744 733 173 612 547 397 674 537 1094 1406 1144 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.7 18.9 18.9 28.7 21.4 21.6 27.0 23.2 21.2 20.8 13.9 13.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.5 0.5 0.6 7.9 1.8 2.2 8.7 2.0 0.1 4.4 0.2 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 1.7 1.7 0.5 2.9 2.7 1.8 2.4 0.2 5.2 1.4 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 37.2 19.4 19.5 36.5 23.2 23.8 35.7 25.2 21.3 25.2 14.1 14.2 LnGrp LOS DBBDCCDCCCBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 384 469 307 680
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.9 24.2 28.6 20.4
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.9 14.8 5.8 19.4 8.9 25.9 7.6 17.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.0 22.3 6.0 25.9 13.8 46.5 10.6 21.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.8 7.5 2.9 6.6 5.7 5.9 4.6 9.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.9 0.0 1.7 0.1 1.4 0.1 2.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 23.3
HCM 7th LOS C
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33)
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary
Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM
+3 (*Kfl
02/13/2026
Tx’Nvi 1” J‘
LaneConfigurations ‘1 +12)
Effie Volume(veh/h) 66 233
FutureVolume(veh/h) 66 233
[ial Q(Qb),veh — 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00
ld-Bike Adj(A_p)
ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00
Ink ZoneOnApproach' _ AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1811 1811
[Flow Rate,veh/h.. -: 265;
PeakHourFactor 0.88 0.88
[cent HeavyVeh,- 6 6
Cap,veh/h 103 713
live OnGreen "" ‘0. 06 0.24
SatFlow,veh/h 1725 2938
in Volume(v),veh/h" i 75 153
GrpSatFlow(s),veh/h/|n 1725 1721
[Serve(g_s),s ‘26 4.4
CycleQClear(g_c),s 2.6 4.4
In InLane 8‘:

LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 103 418
I) Ratio(X) .-3 0.37
AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 305 744
[M PlatoonRatio -0 1.00
UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00
liform Delay (d),s/veh .518. 9
IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 9.5
lial QDelay(d3),s/veh
%i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.3
lsigMovementDelay,“eh“ l l 52. 9. A 8‘ 40-
LnGrpDelay(d),s/veh
lGrp LOS
ApproachVol,veh/h
EproachDelay,s/veh
ApproachLOS C

37.2 19.4
384
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 19.9 14.8
Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 38.0 22.3
Ex QClearTime(g_c+|1),s 14.8 7.5
GreenExtTime(p_c), s 1.2 0.9
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh
No—
‘— 22.9—
_028
'1 1m '1 + r' n + r
48 23 236 192 95 158 21 341 139- 48 23 236 192 95 158 21 341 139 147 0 0; 02' 0 r 0] 0 0 0

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
.95 .00 .97 p.00] .94 .00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
: _ No _ - — No: _ — No
1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811

44. 26; 268 175‘ 108 180: 19I 388 158-

0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6- 116 51 425 267 140 299 238 459 634 516

0.24 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.35
479 1725 2001 1257 1725 1811 1442 1725 1811 1475
156 26 229 214 108 180 19 388 158
1696 1725 1721 1538 1725 1811 1442 1725 1811 1475

4.6 0.9 7.2 7.6 3.7 5.5 0.7 12.8 3.7- 4.6 0.9 7.2 7.6 3.7 5.5 0.7 12.8 3.7 3.9

1.00a _ 0.82 1.00; _ 1.00 1.00
412 51 366 327 140 299 238 459 634 516

0.38 0.51: 0.63 0.66 0.77 0.60 0.08 0.85 0.25
733 173 612 547 397 674 537 1094 1406 1144

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

18.9-28.7;21.4 _.216 _.270 _23.2 _212 _.208 1_3.9-O

0.6 7.9 1.8 2.2 8.7 4.4 0.2

19.5 5.8

4.0 6.0

2.9 0.0

23.3 36.5

19.4 4.9

25.9 6.6

1.7 '242
-9 0.0-0.00.010.00.00.03-0-0-0 0-0- -

1.72.7 ‘ 2‘ - 23.2 23.8 35.7 25.2 21.3 25.2 14.1 14.2
_-_ 469 _ 307 680
_—
_28.6 — 20.

C C C

8.9 25.9 7.6 17.6

4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9

13.8 46.510.6 21.3 5-7 5-9 4-6 9_

0.1 1.4 0.1 2.1
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 320 26 486 108 180 24 388 158 167 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.35 0.18 0.67 0.46 0.55 0.06 0.74 0.22 0.25 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.8 25.5 47.0 26.4 44.9 41.1 0.3 36.4 20.8 4.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 45.8 25.5 47.0 26.4 44.9 41.1 0.3 36.4 20.8 4.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 57 13 81 53 88 0 183 59 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 102 140 48 169 133 188 0 344 118 39 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2611 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 258 1252 146 1070 336 572 579 926 1144 980 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.26 0.18 0.45 0.32 0.31 0.04 0.42 0.14 0.17 Intersection Summary
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33)
Queues
f—rr‘—*x —
Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM
tr‘»; J
02/13/2026
167

0.25 4.4

4.4 39
LaneGroupFlow(vph) 75 320 26 486 108 180 24 388 158
'Ratio 0.38 0.35 0.18 0.67 0.46 0.55 0.06 0.74 0.22
ControlDelay(s/veh) 45.8 25.5 47.0 26.4 44.9 41.1 0.3 36.4 20.8 [we Delay ‘3" 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.0 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 45.8 25.5 47.0 26.4 44.9 41.1 0.3 36.4 20.8 leue Length50th(ft) 57. 13‘ 813 53 _ QueueLength95th(ft) 102 140 48 169 133 188 O 344 118 lernalLinkDist(ft) 11‘ ‘05‘, . TurnBayLength(ft) 100 140 565 335 lse Capacity(vph) —— StarvationCapReductn O O O O O 0 0 O 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O O
muced v/cRatio ‘9 0.26 0.18 0.45 0.32 0.31 0.04 0.42 0.14 Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 41.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139
Future Vol, veh/h 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 142 1 201 1 1 1 253 316 2 6 358 158
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1292 1293 457 1214 1371 337 526 0 0 328 0 0 Stage 1 458 458 - 834 834 -------
Stage 2 833 835 - 380 537 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 136 158 591 154 142 692 1011 - - 1198 - - Stage 1 571 557 - 354 375 -------
Stage 2 354 375 - 630 513 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 91 107 580 67 96 678 1001 - - 1187 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 91 107 - 67 96 -------
Stage 1 562 548 - 243 257 -------
Stage 2 242 257 - 404 505 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 165.71 38.1 4.35 0.09

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 797 - - 91 107 580 112 18 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.253 - - 1.563 0.011 0.347 0.03 0.005 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.8 0 -$ 380.9 39.1 14.5 38.1 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - F EBEAA -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - - 11.2 0 1.5 0.1 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 41.4
LaneConfigurations 1"i 1" iIlr 4!) 41: {$1
'afficVol,veh/h 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139 —
FutureVol,veh/h 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139
lnflictingPedsfi/hr.- 0 mum-I10 ;
om 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free lChannelized
StorageLength 140 500
m InMedianStora9_
Grade,%
‘Hour Factor — HeavyVehicles,% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Imow wr 1 new 1 1 1 253 116* 2 s 358_
ConflictingFIowAII 1292 1293 457 1214 1371 337 526 0 0 328 O O I Stage1 458 458 - 834834 - - - - - -— StageZ 833 835 - 380 537 - Icamdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 658 628— CriticalHdwyStg1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 -
lcalHdSt 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - Follow-upHdwy 3.572 4.0723.372 3.572 4.0723.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - reap-1Maneuver ~136158 591154142 _ Stage1 571 557 - 354 375 - I Stagez 354.4375...3.630;- 513— Platoonblocked,%
.Cap-1 Maneuver ~91 1m. am Imp-:1:

MovCap-2Maneuver ~ 91 107 - 67 96 - - - - — — -
'Stage 1
Stage2 242 257 - 404 505 - - — - - _ _ CtrlDly,s/v 165.71 38.1 4.35 0.09

HCMLOS F E
L
lapacity(veh/h) 797 - - 91 107 580 112 18 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.253 - - 1.563 0.0110.3470.030.005 - - |CM CtrIDIy(s/v) 9.8 0 -$380.9 39.1 14.5 38.1 8 0 - HCMLaneLOS A A - F E B E A A - ICM95th%tileQ(veh) 1 - - 11.2 o 1.5 0.1 0 - - - mlume exceedscapacity $:Delayexceeds300$ - +: ComputationNotDefined *: All major volumein platoon Synchro 12 Report

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 2:01:02 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

SITE LAYOUT
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 2:01:02 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 625 2.0 920 0.679 100 10.0 LOS B 7.5 190.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 625 2.0 0.679 10.0 LOS B 7.5 190.4
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 3 2.0 465 0.007 100 11.5 LOS B 0.0 1.1 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.007 11.5 LOS B 0.0 1.1
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 1143 2.0 1602 0.713 100 4.9 LOS A 10.6 268.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1143 2.0 0.713 4.9 LOS A 10.6 268.6
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 356 2.0 780 0.457 100 14.9 LOS B 3.3 84.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 356 2.0 0.457 14.9 LOS B 3.3 84.8
Intersection 2127 2.0 0.713 8.1 LOS A 10.6 268.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 20 604 1 625 2.0 920 0.679 100 NA NA
Approach 20 604 1 625 2.0 0.679
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 3 2.0 465 0.007 100 NA NA

LANE SUMMARY
W Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1OI 625 2.0 920 0.679 100 10.0 LOS B 7.5 190.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 625 2.0 0.679 10.0 LOS B 7.5 190.4
NorthEast: Private Dr (
Lane 1OI 3 2.0 465 0.007 100 11.5 LOS B 0.0 1.1 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.007 11.5 LOS B 0.0 1.1
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33) (‘
Lane 1OI 1143 2.0 1602 0.713 100 4.9 LOS A 10.6 268.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1143 2.0 0.713 4.9 LOS A 10.6 268.6
SouthWest:DerrickAve(SR33) (‘
Lane 1OI 356 2.0 780 0.457 100 14.9 LOS B 3.3 84.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 356 2.0 0.457 14.9 LOS B 3.3 84.8
Intersection 2127 2.0 0.713 8.1 LOS A 10.6 268.6 B
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and WCratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (Wenot used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akgelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach —SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180) Lane1 20 604 1 625 2.0 920 0.679 100 NA NA |
Approach 20 604 1 625 2.0 0.679
NorthEast: Private Dr
|Lane1 1 1 1 3 2.0 465 0.007 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.007
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 114 1 561 467 1143 2.0 1602 0.713 100 NA NA
Approach 114 1 561 467 1143 2.0 0.713
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 1 324 1 30 356 2.0 780 0.457 100 NA NA
Approach 1 324 1 30 356 2.0 0.457
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 2127 2.0 0.713
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:19 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.007 I
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 114 1 561 467 1143 2.0 1602 0.713 100 NA NA |
Approach 114 1 561 467 1143 2.0 0.713 I
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane1 1 324 1 30 356 2.0 780 0.457 100 NA NA
Approach 1 324 1 30 356 2.0 0.457
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 2127 2.0 0.713
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied %
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:19 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\O||er - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th AWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.1
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 68 2 11 118 214 2 56 11 113 37 5
Future Vol, veh/h 3 68 2 11 118 214 2 56 11 113 37 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 3 72 2 12 124 225 2 59 12 119 39 5
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.7 10.7 8.8 9.9

HCM LOSA B A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 4% 3% 73%
Vol Thru, % 81% 93% 34% 24%
Vol Right, % 16% 3% 62% 3%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 69 73 343 155
LT Vol 2 3 11 113
Through Vol 56 68 118 37
RT Vol 11 2 214 5
Lane Flow Rate 73 77 361 163
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.103 0.107 0.434 0.235
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.11 4.997 4.327 5.191
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 695 713 830 687
Service Time 3.185 3.059 2.368 3.257
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.105 0.108 0.435 0.237
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.8 8.7 10.7 9.9
HCM Lane LOS AABA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.4 2.2 0.9
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th AWSC 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 10.1
‘rsectionLOS B ‘ —LaneConfigurations
lfficVol veh/h ‘I 3 68 2 11 118 214 2 56 11 113 37- FutureVol veh/h 2 11 118 214 2 56 11 113 37 lk HourFactor —5 ~ 9
HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
[mt Flow #3 72 2"12'124 - 225' 2"?39‘72'119 39-
NumberofLanes 0 1 O O 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 —OpposingApproach WB EB SB NB lbposingLanes 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 - ConflictingApproachLeft SB NB EB WB InflictingLanesLeft — ConflictingApproachRight NB SB WB EB IflictingLanesRight ._ — HCMControlDelay,s/veh 8.7 10.7 8.8 9.9 lfLOS T—r—P— —VolLeft,% 3% 4% 3% 73%
'I'hru,% - 81% 93% 34% 24% — VolRight,% 16% 3% 62% 3%
.Control—g: Stop Stop St—
TrafficVolbyLane 73 343 155
m _9 638‘ 11— ThroughVol 11837
.ol _2'14—
LaneFlowRate 77 361 163
ImetryGrp —7 1: 1— reeofUtil(X) 0.103 0.107 0.434 0.235 jwal_1 4-997 4-327 5-1—
Convergence,Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
_95 713 830 68—
ServiceTime 3.185 3.059 2.368 3.257
In LaneVICRafi—5 0-108 0-435 02—
HCMControlDelay,s/veh 8.7 10.7 9.9
HCM95th-tileQ 0.3 0.4 2.2 0.9
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 57 110 206 353 385 100
Future Vol, veh/h 57 110 206 353 385 100
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 4 4 0 0 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 61 118 222 380 414 108
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1245 422 526 0 - 0
Stage 1 418 -----
Stage 2 827 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 189 625 1026 - - -
Stage 1 658 -----
Stage 2 425 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 147 621 1022 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 147 -----
Stage 1 513 -----
Stage 2 423 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 23.66 3.5 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1022 - 147 621 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.217 - 0.416 0.191 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.5 - 45.8 12.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - E B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - 1.8 0.7 - -
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 4.9
LaneConfigurations ‘1 fl' ‘lfi 1|- + fr
'6fficV0Lveh/h57 110206353385100 — FutureVol,veh/h 57 110 206 353 385 100 InflictingPeds.#/hr A; 4 4 0 0 — SignControl Stop Stop Free Free Free Free IChannelized+ _
StorageLength 590 O O - - O
m inMedianStorage_
Grade,% O - - 0 O - ‘Hour Factor — HeavyVehicles,% 5 5 5 5 5 5 ”Flow _6'|—'11W2 '380 414
ConflictingFlow All 1245 422 526 O - 0
I Stage1 418 — - - — Stage2 827 - - - - - [cal Hdwy 6.45 62— CriticalHdwyStg1 5.45 - - - - _
lcaIHdWStgz 5-45 -— Follow-upHdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - - ICap—1Maneuve1al62— Stage1 658 - - - - - I Stage2 4_ Platoonblocked,% - .Cap-1Maneuver — MovCap-2Maneuver 147 - — - - _ IStagm _ Stage2 423 - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 23.66 3.5 0

HCMLOS C
I
lapacity(veh/h) 1022 - 147 621 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.217 - 0.416 0.191 KM Ct” DIY(3”) ___9-5 ' 45-8 122—
HCMLaneLOS A - E B - -
Synchro 12 Report
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 58 410 202 186 115 27
Future Vol, veh/h 58 410 202 186 115 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 63 446 220 202 125 29
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 422 0 - 0 892 321
Stage 1 - - - - 321 -
Stage 2 - - - - 572 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1137 - - - 312 720
Stage 1 - - - - 736 -
Stage 2 - - - - 565 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1137 - - - 289 720
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 289 -
Stage 1 - - - - 681 -
Stage 2 - - - - 565 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.03 0 25.54

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 223 - - - 326
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 - - - 0.473
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.4 0 - - 25.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 2.4
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Int Delay,s/veh 4.1
LaneConfigurations 4‘ 13! 1|‘I’If
'afficVoLveh/h58 410202186115 27— FutureVol,veh/h 58 410 202 186 115 27 InflictingPeds.#/hr .. 0 0 0 0—
SignControl Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
lChannelized "" StorageLength - - - - O - m inMedianStora— Grade,% - O O - O - ‘Hour Factua—
HeavyVehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2
2 2
UFIOW " 53' 446220 20_
ConflictingFlow All 422 0 - O 892 321
r Stage1 — — 'I'- - 321 - — StageZ - - - - 572 - [cal Hdwy — CriticalHdwyStg1 - - - - 5.42 - lcal HdwyStg2
Follow-upHdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
ICap—1Maneuver — Stage1 - - - - 736 - I Stage2 — Platoonblocked,% - - _ .Cap-1Maneuve—
MovCap-2Maneuver - - - - 289 -
'Stage1 _
Stage2 - - - - 565 -
CtrlDly,S/V 1.03 0 25.54

HCMLOS D
I
lapacity(veh/h) 223 - - - 326
HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.055 - - - 0.473
KM Ct” DIY(3”) 8-4 —0———'_25_5— HCMLaneLOS A A - - D
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 180 292 77 59 243 201 86 208 106 213 214 97 Future Volume (veh/h) 180 292 77 59 243 201 86 208 106 213 214 97 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 196 317 68 64 264 175 93 226 92 232 233 84 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 245 867 182 89 436 276 120 376 287 285 549 432 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.31 0.31 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.17 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2787 586 1725 1972 1248 1725 1811 1386 1725 1811 1423 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 196 193 192 64 229 210 93 226 92 232 233 84 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1652 1725 1721 1500 1725 1811 1386 1725 1811 1423 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.4 5.9 6.1 2.5 8.1 8.6 3.6 7.6 3.8 8.7 6.9 2.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.4 5.9 6.1 2.5 8.1 8.6 3.6 7.6 3.8 8.7 6.9 2.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 535 514 89 380 331 120 376 287 285 549 432 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.36 0.37 0.72 0.60 0.63 0.78 0.60 0.32 0.81 0.42 0.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 563 853 819 251 541 472 328 645 494 640 973 765 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.0 18.0 18.1 31.5 23.6 23.8 30.8 24.2 22.7 27.1 18.8 17.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.9 0.4 0.4 10.2 1.5 2.0 10.2 1.6 0.6 5.6 0.5 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.3 2.2 2.2 1.2 3.2 3.0 1.8 3.3 1.2 3.9 2.8 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 33.9 18.4 18.5 41.6 25.1 25.8 41.1 25.7 23.3 32.7 19.3 17.6 LnGrp LOS CBBDCCDCCCBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 581 503 411 549
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.7 27.5 28.7 24.7
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.2 18.9 7.5 25.9 8.7 25.3 13.6 19.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 24.0 9.8 33.4 12.8 36.2 22.0 21.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 9.6 4.5 8.1 5.6 8.9 9.4 10.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 1.4 0.0 2.4 0.1 1.7 0.4 2.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 25.9
HCM 7th LOS C
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
J43 (*Kfl Tx’\$ J
Lane —Configurations ‘1 +12) ‘1 +12) ‘1 + F ‘1 1* il'
fifficVolume(veh/h) 180 292 77 59 243 201 86 208 106 213 214 - FutureVolume(veh/h) 180 292 77 59 243 201 86 208 106 213 214 97 [iaIQ(Qb),veh 0 0; 0 0 r 0' 0: 0: 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-BikeAdj(A_p) .93 .00 .94 II .00‘ 1 .90 .00
ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No: Z : No: I Z No: : :

AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 [Flow Rate,veh/h.. _E 317; 68. 64; 264: 175. 93; 226: 92‘ 232 233- PeakHourFactor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 [cent HeavyVeh,_ 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6- Cap,veh/h 245 867 182 89 436 276 120 376 287 285 549 432 live OnGreen "" 10.14 0.31 0.31 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.17 0.30 gt Flow, veh/h 1725 2787 586 1725 1972 1248 1725 1811 1386 1725 1811 1423 loVqme(v),veh/h" i196 193 192 64 229 210 93 226 92 232 233 GrpSatFIow(s),veh/h/In1725 1721 1652 1725 1721 1500 1725 1811 1386 1725 1811 1423 [Serve(g_s),s t7. 4 5.9 6.1 2.5 8.1 8.6 3.6 7.6 3.8 8.7 6.9- CycleQ Clear(g_c),s 5.9 6.1 2.5 8.1 8.6 3.6 7.6 3.8 8.7 6.9 2.9 [p InLane “0 _ 0.35 1.00a _ 0.83 1.00 _ 1.00 1.00
LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 245 535 514 89 380 331 120 376 287 285 549 432 I) Ratio(X) ' -0 0.36 0.37 0.72 0.60 0.63 0.78 0.60 0.32 0.81 0.42- AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 563 853 819 251 541 472 328 645 494 640 973 765 [M PlatoonRatio .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 liform Delay (d),s/veh ‘0 18.0 _18.1_31.5 _.236 _23.8 30.8 24.2 _22.7 _.27 1 _.188- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 5.9 0.4 10.2 1.5 10.2 5.6 0.5 0.2
lial QDelay(d3),s/veh -_0. .0-0. 0.0. 3.0. 0.3 0.0. 0.0.0. 0.0. §.o. 0.0. (- %i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 3.3 0.9
lsig MovementDelay,s/veh‘ ‘2 22‘ A 23- 21 A A“ 92- 8-
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 33.9 18.4 18.5 41.6 25.1 25.8 41.1 25.7 23.3 32.7 19.3 17.6 lGrpLOS _— ApproachVol,veh/h 581 503 411 549
EproachDelay,s/veh ‘— 23] _ 27.5' ' 28.7 — 24.

ApproachLOS C C C C
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 15.2 18.9 7.5 25.9 8.7 25.3 13.6 19.8 Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 25.0 24.O 9.8 33.4 12.8 36.2 22.0 21.2 ExQCIearTime(g_c+I1),s10.7 9.6 4.5 8.1 5.6 8.9 9.4 10.6— GreenExtTime(p_c),S 0.6 1.4 0.0 2.4 0.1 1.7 0.4 2.0
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 25.9
Synchro 12 Report
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 196 401 64 482 93 226 115 232 233 105 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.41 0.37 0.69 0.45 0.64 0.28 0.66 0.41 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 43.8 25.0 47.6 27.4 46.7 42.2 2.7 42.7 27.8 3.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 43.8 25.0 47.6 27.4 46.7 42.2 2.7 42.7 27.8 3.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 98 86 32 80 47 112 0 115 103 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 213 160 93 173 122 236 9 242 206 22 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2599 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 487 1418 217 971 283 559 543 554 844 710 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.28 0.29 0.50 0.33 0.40 0.21 0.42 0.28 0.15 Intersection Summary
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33)
Queues
f—rr‘—*\ — 401 64 482 93

0.41 0.37 0.69 0.45

25.0 47.6 27.4 46.7

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

25.0 47.6 27.4 46.7
86a 32. 80‘ 47
160 93 173 122
'9‘. .91
140 565

0.0a 0.0I 0.0
Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM
Tr‘-l J
02/13/2026

15.1 233 105
(141 (120 |||||||| 218 31
on
218 31
206 22
[86Capacity(vph) —
LaneGroupFlow(vph) 196
'Ratio 0.63
ControlDelay(s/veh) 43.8
[we Delay '1' 0
TotalDelay (s/veh) 43.8
leue Length50th(ft)
QueueLength95th(ft) 213
lernal LinkDist(ft)
TurnBayLength(ft) 100
StarvationCapReductn 0
lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O
mucedv/cRatio ‘0

O O O O

O O O O

0.28 0.29 0.50 0.33
0 0
0 0 0-28 0-15_
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 61.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106
Future Vol, veh/h 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 135 1 253 1 1 4 260 482 2 3 404 114
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1490 1492 481 1435 1548 503 528 0 0 494 0 0 Stage 1 478 478 - 1013 1013 -------
Stage 2 1013 1014 - 421 535 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 99 120 573 108 111 557 1009 - - 1039 - - Stage 1 557 546 - 281 309 -------
Stage 2 281 309 - 598 514 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 61 75 562 37 70 546 999 - - 1029 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 61 75 - 37 70 -------
Stage 1 550 538 - 179 197 -------
Stage 2 177 197 - 324 507 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 256.4 35.82 3.45 0.05

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 629 - - 61 75 562 123 11 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.26 - - 2.221 0.014 0.45 0.052 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.9 0 -$ 705.4 53.5 16.5 35.8 8.5 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - F F C E A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - - 13.2 0 2.3 0.2 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon 6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
IntDelay,s/veh 61.8
LaneConfigurations 1"i 1* F 4!) e111 e111
'afficVol,veh/h 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106 —
FutureVol,veh/h 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106
InflictingPedsfi/hr J 0 .10 .10-451. 10 . om 0—
SignControl Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free lChannelized - StorageLength 140 500
m InMedianStora9_
Grade,%
‘Hour Factor — HeavyVehicles,% 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Imow $1753 1 1 4 260 482~z 3 402r‘_
ConflictingFlow All 1490 1492 481 1435 1548 503 528 0 0 494 O O 'Stage1 478 478 -1o131o13 — - - - - -—
StageZ 10131014 - 421 535 - Icamdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 m 658 628— CriticalHdwyStg1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 -
lcalHdSt 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - Follow-upHdwy 3.572 4.0723.372 3.572 4.0723.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - leap-1Maneuver ~99 120573108111_ Stage1 557 546 - 281 309 - I StageZ 281M309 - 598 514
Platoonblocked,%
.Cap-1Maneuver ~
6—
MovCap-2 Maneuver ~ 61 75
IStagm _
Stage2 177 197 - 324 507 - - - - - - - CtrlDly,s/v 256.4 35.82 3.45 0.05

HCMLOS F E
n
lapacity(veh/h) 629 - - 61 75 562 123 11 - - HCMLaneV/CRatio 0.26 - - 2.2210.0140.45 0.0520.003 - - |CMCtrlDly(s/v) 9.9 0 415 705.453.5 16.5 35.8 8.5 0 - HCMLaneLOS A A - F F C E A A - ICM95th%tileQ(veh) 1 - - 13.2 o 2.3 0.2 0 - - - mlume exceedscapacity $:Delayexceeds300$ - +: ComputationNotDefined *: All major volumein platoon Synchro 12 Report
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrants
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT
Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrants

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Sorensen Ave
NB/SB
1 30
Smoot Ave
EB/WB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour Existi
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Sorensen Ave Smoot Ave
Direction NB/SB EBNVB
Number of Lanes 1 1
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lII.-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin suinfiuntufiunimuhnmkufiunhnm
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 236 183
17:00 146 166
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour Existi
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 236 183
1 7:00 146 166
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Derrick Ave (SR-33)
NB/SB
2 30
Smoot Ave
EB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour Existi
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Derrick Ave (SR-33) Smoot Ave
Direction NB/SB EB
Number of Lanes 2 2
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
Low Population? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pupulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph 4m srfumin 7611HE!)56n1tiu11iu1fiu1iu14iu15iu1aiu1iu1m
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmh Appmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 679 139
16:45 735 82
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour Existi
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 679 139
16:45 735 82
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
SR-180 (Oller St)
NB/SB
1 30
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour Existi
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name SR—180(Oller St) Belmont Ave
Direction NB/SB EBNVB
Number of Lanes 1 2
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lIu-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin 56n1tiu11iu1fiu1iu14iu15iu1aiu1iu1m
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 682 153
17:00 766 206
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Existi arrant 3: Peak Hour
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 682 153
17:00 766 206
2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Sorensen Ave
NB/SB
1 30
Smoot Ave
EB/WB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: PeakHour EXiStingP'US'
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Sorensen Ave Smoot Ave
Direction NB/SB EBNVB
Number of Lanes 1 1
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lII.-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin suinfiuntufiunimuhnmkufiunhnm
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 236 183
17:00 146 166
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: PeakHour EXiStingP'US'
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 236 183
1 7:00 146 166
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Derrick Ave (SR-33)
NB/SB
2 30
Smoot Ave
EB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: PeakHour EXiStingP'US'
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Derrick Ave (SR-33) Smoot Ave
Direction NB/SB EB
Number of Lanes 2 2
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
Low Population? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pupulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph 4m srfumin 7611HE!)56n1tiu11iu1fiu1iu14iu15iu1aiu1iu1m
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmh Appmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 679 139
16:45 735 82
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: PeakHour EXiStingP'US'
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 679 139
16:45 735 82
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
-
1 0
Amador Ave

EB/WB/SB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: PeakHour EXiStingP'US'
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name - Amador Ave
Direction EBNVB/SB
Number of Lanes 1 1
Approach Speed 0 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lII.-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin suinfiuntufiunimuhnmkufiunhnm
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: PeakHour EXiStingP'US'
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
SR-180 (Oller St)
NB/SB
1 30
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: PeakHour EXiStingP'US'
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name SR—180(Oller St) Belmont Ave
Direction NB/SB EBNVB
Number of Lanes 1 2
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lIu-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin 56n1tiu11iu1fiu1iu14iu15iu1aiu1iu1m
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 714 188
17:00 831 230
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
California 2012
Hour
7:30
17:00
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
714
831
Existing Plus |
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
188
230
2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Sorensen Ave
NB/SB
1 30
Smoot Ave
EB/WB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour Near-TermWithI
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Sorensen Ave Smoot Ave
Direction NB/SB EBNVB
Number of Lanes 1 1
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lII.-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin suinfiuntufiunimuhnmkufiunhnm
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 309 265
17:00 224 343
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour Near-TermWithI
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 309 265
17:00 224 343
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Derrick Ave (SR-33)
NB/SB
2 30
Smoot Ave
EB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour Near-TermWW
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Derrick Ave (SR-33) Smoot Ave
Direction NB/SB EB
Number of Lanes 2 2
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
Low Population? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pupulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph 4m srfuminin sin 56n1tiu11iu1fiu1iu14iu15iu1aiu1iu1m
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmh Appmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 925 266
16:45 1,044 167
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour Near-TermWW
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 925 266
16:45 1 ,044 167
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
1 30
Amador Ave
SB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour Near-TermWW
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Belmont Ave Amador Ave
Direction EBNVB SB
Number of Lanes 1 1
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lII.-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin suinfiuntufiunimuhnmkufiunhnm
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 665 194
16:45 856 142
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour Near-TermWW
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 665 194
16:45 856 142
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
SR-180 (Oller St)
NB/SB
1 30
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour Near-TermWW
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name SR—180(Oller St) Belmont Ave
Direction NB/SB EBNVB
Number of Lanes 1 2
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lIu-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin 56n1tiu11iu1fiu1iu14iu15iu1aiu1iu1m
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 740 266
17:00 920 282
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
California 2012
Hour
7:30
17:00
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
740
920
Near-Term With |
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
266
282
2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Sorensen Ave
NB/SB
1 30
Smoot Ave
EB/WB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour 2047With|
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Sorensen Ave Smoot Ave
Direction NB/SB EBNVB
Number of Lanes 1 1
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lII.-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin suinfiuntufiunimuhnmkufiunhnm
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 309 265
17:00 224 343
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour 2047With|
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 309 265
17:00 224 343
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Derrick Ave (SR-33)
NB/SB
2 30
Smoot Ave
EB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour 2047Withl
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Derrick Ave (SR-33) Smoot Ave
Direction NB/SB EB
Number of Lanes 2 2
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
Low Population? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pupulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph 4m srfuminin sin 56n1tiu11iu1fiu1iu14iu15iu1aiu1iu1m
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmh Appmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 925 266
16:45 1,044 167
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour 2047Withl
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 925 266
16:45 1 ,044 167
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
1 30
Amador Ave
SB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour 2047Withl
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name Belmont Ave Amador Ave
Direction EBNVB SB
Number of Lanes 1 1
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant3 Met? —
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met?—
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lII.-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin suinfiuntufiunimuhnmkufiunhnm
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 665 194
16:45 856 142
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour 2047Withl
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Hour Major Street Minor Street
Total All Highest Volume
Approaches (vph) Approach (vph)
7:30 665 194
16:45 856 142
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
SR-180 (Oller St)
NB/SB
1 30
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
2 30
Yes
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Yes
2 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012 MinnrSheet Highest-VfllwneAppmachWPH} arrant 3: Peak Hour 2047Withl
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Major Street Minor Street
Street Name SR—180(Oller St) Belmont Ave
Direction NB/SB EBNVB
Number of Lanes 1 2
Approach Speed 30 30
Warrant 3 Met? Yes
Details
LowPopulation? —
ConditionA Met? — ConditionB Met? Yes
Notes 0 Hours met (1 required) Notes 2 Hours met (1 required) MinorApproachTimeDelayConditionMet? —
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met? Met
TotalEnteringIntersectionVolumeConditionMet? —
Peak Hnur Vehicular Volume
{Immunity Pnpulatim Greater Than 10,000 and Hajur Street App-mach Speed Beluw 40 mph —WajmntCmve
I WmEd
1' Unwajmnted
—lMajur,lIu-finur —lMajur,2+L-finur —1+Majur,lhfinm —1+Majm,1+hfinur 4m srfuminin sin 56n1tiu11iu1fiu1iu14iu15iu1aiu1iu1m
Majm Sheet- TmEII11fHmhAppmaches {UPI-l}
California2012 1 2/17/2026
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 962 303
17:00 1,177 362
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
arrant 3: Peak Hour
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
California 2012
Hour
7:30
17:00
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
962
1,177
2047 With |
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
303
362
2/17/2026
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX E

IMPROVED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEETS
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX E

IMPROVED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEETS

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107 Future Volume (veh/h) 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 121 1 111 1 1 1 231 311 3 7 292 120 Peak Hour Factor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 154 357 287 3 87 87 286 821 8 16 365 150
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.17 0.47 0.47 0.01 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1429 1697 781 781 1697 1761 17 1697 1190 489 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 121 1 111 1 0 2 231 0 314 7 0 412
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1429 1697 0 1561 1697 0 1778 1697 0 1679 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.2 0.0 6.3 0.2 0.0 12.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.2 0.0 6.3 0.2 0.0 12.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.29
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 154 357 287 3 0 174 286 0 829 16 0 515 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.39 0.33 0.00 0.01 0.81 0.00 0.38 0.45 0.00 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 277 681 546 181 0 509 492 0 1265 181 0 888 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 17.7 19.1 27.5 0.0 21.8 22.1 0.0 9.5 27.2 0.0 17.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.6 0.0 0.9 52.1 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.3 18.7 0.0 2.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 2.1 0.2 0.0 4.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 33.1 17.7 20.0 79.7 0.0 21.9 27.4 0.0 9.8 45.9 0.0 20.5 LnGrp LOS C B B E C C A D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 233 3 545 419
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.8 41.1 17.3 20.9
Approach LOS C D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.5 30.7 4.1 16.0 13.3 21.8 9.0 11.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.9 39.3 5.9 21.1 16.0 29.2 9.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.2 8.3 2.0 5.7 9.2 14.5 5.9 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 2.3 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 20.5
HCM 7th LOS C
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tx’\$ J
Lane —Configurations ‘i 1“ i‘Ir "i 12) ‘i 1‘.) "i 1‘;
Fffic Volume(veh/h) 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 - FutureVolume(veh/h) 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107 lial Q(Qb),veh 0 O.—
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) . . . .00 . . ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No No ‘ ‘ No
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 [FlowRate,veh/h ...— 1‘11-“ 1.2313 311.»- 7‘292-
PeakHourFactor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 [cent HeavyVeh,-8 8 8Z 8‘ 8! 8Z 8 8‘ 8‘ 8 8- Cap,veh/h 154 357 287 3 87 87 286 821 8 16 365 150 live OnGreen "" 1.09 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.11_ 0.11 0.17 0.47 0.47 0.01 0.31 S_atFlow,veh/h _1697 1781 1429 1697 781 781 1697 1761 17 1697 1190 489 In Volume(v),veh/h" 1121 1 111 1 0 2 231 O 314 7 0 - GrpSatFIow(s),veh/h/In 1697 1781 1429 1697 O 1561 1697 0 1778 1697 O 1679 [Serve(g_s),s 13.9 0.0 3.7 0.0.. 0.0i. 0.1 7.2 0.0 6.3 0.2 _ 0.0- CycleQClear(g_c),s 3.9 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.2 0.0 6.3 0.2 0.0 12.5 [p InLane m _1.00 -1 IX. '- 50 1.00. ‘001 10.0. - LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 154 357 287 O 174 286 0 829 O 515 E Ratio(X) .-9 0.00 0.39 0.33-0.00 '0.01 0.81I 0.00: 0.38 0.45.0. 00- AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 277 681 546 181 0 509 492 O 1265 181 888 [M PlatoonRatio -)0 1.00 1.00 1.0021.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0_0 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.OO 1.00 liformDelay(d),s/veh‘5_17._7 19.1-.275; 00:21.8 _22.1‘0.0= 9.5 _27.2: 0.0- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 8.6 0.O 0.9 52.1 0.0 O.0 0.3 18.7 0.0 2.9 lial Q
Delay<d3)s/veh -0 DOMOQ-ODOOIOO-DIOO.OOIO-
%i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.8 4.6
lsigMovementDelay,s/veh.‘ I M“; l; 0-
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 33.1 17.7 20.0 79.7 .0 45.9 20.5
lGrpLOS — ApproachVol,veh/h 233 3 545 419
EproachDelay,s/veh — 26.8' — 411 — 17.3 — 20
ApproachLOS C D B C
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 4.5 30.7 4.1 16.0 13.3 21.8 9.0 11.O Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.O 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 5.9 39.3 5.9 21.1 16.O 29.2 9.0 18.0 FxQCIearTime(g_c+l1),s 2.2 8.3 20* 5.7 9.2 14.5 5.9 2.1—— GreenExtTime(p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 2.3 0.1 0.0
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 20.5
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 1 139 1 2 231 314 7 441
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.01 0.55 0.25 0.04 0.69
Control Delay (s/veh) 33.4 28.0 7.6 31.0 27.0 28.3 6.7 30.4 22.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 33.4 28.0 7.6 31.0 27.0 28.3 6.7 30.4 22.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 40 0 0 0 0 71 33 2 125
Queue Length 95th (ft) 92 4 12 4 6 145 114 13 204
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 296 731 687 194 562 526 1291 194 963 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.44 0.24 0.04 0.46 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
}_,_~,, f“"\1‘“~l
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 121 1 139 1 2 231 314 7 441
'Ratio 0.44 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.01 0.55 0.25 0.04 0.69 —
ControlDelay(s/veh) 33.4 28.0 7.6 31.0 27.0 28.3 6.7 30.4 22.4 [we Delay '2: 0.0 0. .0 0.0‘ 0.0: 0.0 0.0 —
TotalDelay(s/veh) 33.4 28.0 7.6 31.0 27.0 28.3 6.7 30.4 22.4 leue Length50th(ft)
QueueLength95th(ft) 92 4 12 4 6 145 114 13 204
lernal LinkDist(ft)
TurnBayLength(ft) 140 500
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O 0
mucedv/cRatio ‘1 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.44 0.24 0.04 0.4_ Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 1 118 1 1 4 116 373 2 3 280 39
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 117 355 284 4 38 154 153 630 3 7 412 57
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1429 1697 293 1172 1697 1770 9 1697 1524 212 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 73 1 118 1 0 5 116 0 375 3 0 319
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1429 1697 0 1465 1697 0 1779 1697 0 1736 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.7 0.0 7.0 0.1 0.0 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.7 0.0 7.0 0.1 0.0 6.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.12
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 117 355 284 4 0 192 153 0 634 7 0 469 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.00 0.42 0.24 0.00 0.03 0.76 0.00 0.59 0.43 0.00 0.68 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 251 796 638 247 0 651 335 0 979 247 0 866 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.3 13.0 14.2 20.2 0.0 15.3 18.0 0.0 10.6 20.1 0.0 13.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.3 0.0 1.0 27.0 0.0 0.1 7.5 0.0 0.9 37.1 0.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.2 0.1 0.0 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.6 13.0 15.1 47.2 0.0 15.4 25.6 0.0 11.5 57.2 0.0 14.9 LnGrp LOS C B B D B C B E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 192 6 491 322
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.4 20.7 14.8 15.3
Approach LOS B C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.2 19.3 4.1 13.0 7.6 15.9 6.8 10.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.9 22.3 5.9 18.1 8.0 20.2 6.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 9.0 2.0 4.9 4.7 8.7 3.7 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.3 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 15.7
HCM 7th LOS B
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tx’\i J
Lane —Configurations ‘1 + F "i 1:). ‘1 1‘.) "i
[EffieVolume(veh/h) 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260‘46
FutureVolume(veh/h) 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260
lial Q(Qb),veh 0 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) . . . .00 . .00
ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No' E No 3 Z No3 E No
AdjSatFlow veh/h/In 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 [FlowRate veh/h .50- 11118. 1‘ 1‘ 4.116: 373‘ -
3&280-
PeakHourFactor 09. 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 [cent HeavyVeh,-8_ 8 8 8‘ 8--. 8 8 8 _ 8. 8 8-
Cap,veh/h 117 355 284 4 38 154 153 630 3 7 412 57
live OnGreen "’ ‘m 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.27 SatFlow,veh/h 1697 1781 1429 1697 293 1172 1697 1770 9 1697 1524 212 iDVolume(v),"'veh/h“_.73 1 118 1 0 5 116 0 375 3 0-
GrpSatF|0W(),Veh/h/In 1697 1781 1429 1697 O 1465 1697 0 1779 1697 O 1736 [Serve(g_s),s ‘1 0.0 2.9 0.0., 0.0 _ 0.1 2.7 _ 0.0 _ 7.0 0.1- 0.0- CycleQ Clear(g_c),s 1.7 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.7 0.0 7.0 0.1 0.0 6.7 [p InLane m 1.00 1.00. It 80 1.00. m.01_1.0(- 0-
LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 117 355 284 0 192 153 0 634 469
I) Ratio(X) _2— 0.00 0.42 0.24I100 .003 0.76.000 [0.59 0.43-0.00- AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 251 796 638 247 0 651 335 0 979 247 0 866 [M PlatoonRatio , -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 -100 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 21.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 liform Delay (d),s/veh ‘3_13.0_ 14.2 20.2 0.0'15.3_ 18.0I 0.0= 10.6 _.201 I 0.0-1 IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 5.3 0.0 1.0 27.0 7.5 0.9 37.1 0.01.7 lial Q
Delay(d3)s/veh“0- (1.0- 0.0- 0.0 0‘1 (10.9 H (1.00.0 (m-Z %i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.8 O.0 .3
lsig MovementDelay,3W1“ ‘0 M“.‘.--
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 23.6 13.0 15.1 47.2 15.4 25.6 O.0 11.5 57.2 14.9 lGrpLOS _
ApproachVol,veh/h 192 6 491 322
EproachDelay,s/veh‘ 18.4 — 20.7 — 14.8 15
ApproachLOS B C B B
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 4.2 19.3 4.1 13.0 7.6 15.9 6.8 10.2 Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 5.9 22.3 5.9 18.1 8.0 20.2 6.0 18.0 BxQCIearTime(g_c+l1),s 2.1 9.0 2.0 49* 4.7 8.7 3.7 2.1—— GreenExtTime(p_c), s 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.3 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.0
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 15.7
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 73 1 147 1 5 116 375 3 329
v/c Ratio 0.27 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.02 0.37 0.34 0.01 0.42
Control Delay (s/veh) 22.8 19.0 8.2 22.0 15.2 23.0 9.1 21.7 14.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 22.8 19.0 8.2 22.0 15.2 23.0 9.1 21.7 14.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 0 0 0 0 24 33 1 61
Queue Length 95th (ft) #67 4 42 5 9 #102 203 9 182
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 276 823 749 254 696 345 1064 254 981 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.34 0.35 0.01 0.34 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
}_,_~,, f“"\1‘“~l
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 73 1 147 1 5 116 375 3 329
'Ratio 0.27 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.02 0.37 0.34 0.01 0.42 —
ControlDelay(s/veh) 22.8 19.0 8.2 22.0 15.2 23.0 9.1 21.7 14.8 [we Delay 7" 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 22.8 19.0 8.2 22.0 15.2 23.0 9.1 21.7 14.8 leue Length50th(ft) A L2
QueueLength95th(ft) #67 4 42 5 9 #102 203 9 182
lernal LinkDist(ft) g
TurnBayLength(ft) 140 500
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O 0
Reducedv/cRatio 0.26 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.34 0.35 0.01 0.34 — percentilevolumeexceedscapacity,queuemaybe long Queueshownis maximumaftertwocycles.

Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 261 3 545 448
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 282 3 588 484
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 324 716 140 251
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 411 12 466 468
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.9 5.6 8.8 8.9
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 282 3 588 484
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 992 665 1196 1068
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.925 0.975 0.927 0.925
Flow Entry, veh/h 261 3 545 448
Cap Entry, veh/h 916 648 1107 987
V/C Ratio 0.285 0.005 0.492 0.454
Control Delay, s/veh 6.9 5.6 8.8 8.9

LOS AAAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1032
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 8.4
IntersectionLOS A
Lanes 1 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1 1
kdj ApproaCh FIOW VGh/h M 545 , DemandFlowRate,veh/h 282 588 484 IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
mroachDelay.WWW
ApproachLOS
DesignatedMoves LTR LTR LTR LTR
'sumedMoves LTR - LTR - LTR - LTR _ RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~
A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) 1 —
EntryFlow,veh/h 282 3 588 484
E EntryLane,ve.

EntryHVAdjFactor 0.925 0.975 0.927 0.925
”V Entry,veh/h‘ CapEntry,veh/h 916 648 1107 987
IRatio — ControlDelay,s/veh
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 6.7
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 221 6 491 332
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 239 6 530 358
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 306 607 83 127
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 179 6 462 486
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.2 5.0 7.4 6.0
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 239 6 530 358
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1010 743 1268 1212
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.924 0.988 0.927 0.926
Flow Entry, veh/h 221 6 491 332
Cap Entry, veh/h 932 733 1173 1121
V/C Ratio 0.237 0.008 0.419 0.296
Control Delay, s/veh 6.2 5.0 7.4 6.0

LOS AAAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1021
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 6.7
IntersectionLOS A
Lanes 1 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1 1
kdj ApproaCh FIOW VGh/h A 491
DemandFlowRate,veh/h 239 530 358
IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
mroachDelay.WWW?-
ApproachLOS
DesignatedMoves LTR LTR LTR LTR
'sumedMoves LTR - LTR - LTR - LTR _ RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~ . A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) 22'. — EntryFlow,veh/h 239 6 530 358
E EntryLane,veEntryHVAdjFactor 0.924 0.988 0.927 0.926 ”V Entry,veh/h
CapEntry,veh/h 932 733 1173 1121
IRatio — ControlDelay,s/veh
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 94 138 154 186 334 53
Future Volume (veh/h) 94 138 154 186 334 53
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93
Parking Bus, Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 125 147 205 248 445 56
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Cap, veh/h 251 228 259 1125 637 500
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.62 0.35 0.35
Sat Flow, veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1433
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 125 147 205 248 445 56
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1433
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 3.7 4.7 2.5 8.7 1.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 3.7 4.7 2.5 8.7 1.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 251 228 259 1125 637 500
V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.65 0.79 0.22 0.70 0.11
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 742 673 345 1422 843 662
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.2 16.6 17.0 3.5 11.6 9.1
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 3.1 8.9 0.1 1.7 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 3.3 2.2 0.5 3.0 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.8 19.7 25.9 3.6 13.3 9.2
LnGrp LOS B B C A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 272 453 501
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.8 13.7 12.8
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.4 11.0 11.0 19.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 18.0 8.2 19.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 5.7 6.7 10.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.7 0.1 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 14.5
HCM 7th LOS B
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
«’w‘x ft 4"
Lane —Configurations ‘1 F ‘1 + + F
fine Volume(veh/h) 94 138 154 186 334 53 —
FutureVolume(veh/h) 94 138 154 186 334 53
[ial Q(Qb),veh 0 : 0t 0. 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ld-Bike Adj(A_p) “‘ ’ 1.00m .00t t
ParkingBus,Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ink ZoneOnApproach No No
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
IL FlowRate,veh/h -. -5 147Z 205 248 445 — PeakHourFactor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 [centHeavyWen-5 5 5 5 5 — Cap,veh/h 251 228 259 1125 637 500 live OnGreen~ ‘115 0.15 0.15 0.62 0.35 0.3—
SatFlow, veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1433
iDV0|ume(v),veh/h" i125 147 205 248 445 5—
GrpSatF|0W(S),Veh/h/|n 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1433
[Serve(g_s)s12 8 3.7 4.7 2-5 8-7 1-—
CycleQClear(g_c),s 3.7 4.7 2.5 8.7 1.1
In InLane 8.0 1-00 1-00 - :—
LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 251 228 259 1125 637 500
I Ratio<X> "o 0-65 0-79 0-22 _ 0-70 0—
AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 742 673 345 1422 843 662
[M PlatoonRatio , -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1—
UpstreamFilter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
liformDelay(d).s/veh.516 6-17 0-3 5—_.11_ 6— IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 1.5 3.1 0.1 01 lial Q
Delay(d3),s/veh.0 0.0 (.11 I-—
%i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.0
lsigMovementDelay,s/vehI." -0 53- 0—
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 17.8 19.7 25.9 3.6 13.3 9.2
lGrpLOS __
ApproachVol,veh/h 272 453 501
EproachDelay,s/veh 73.8 — 13.7 12.8
ApproachLOS B B B
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 30.4 11.0 11.0 19.3
'1ange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 32.2 18.0 8.2 19.1
Ex0ClearTime(g_c+I1),sW‘s? 6.7 10—
GreenExtTime(p_c),s 1.5 0.7 0.1 1.9
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 14.5
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 184 205 248 445 71
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.43 0.67 0.20 0.66 0.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 22.0 7.2 35.5 5.0 19.9 4.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 22.0 7.2 35.5 5.0 19.9 4.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 0 61 27 110 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 25 #123 51 167 15
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 2132 750
Turn Bay Length (ft) 590 250 150
Base Capacity (vph) 659 684 306 1268 752 627
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.27 0.67 0.20 0.59 0.11
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved Tl¥
02/13/2026
Illback CapReductn m
Queues
J“ N ‘\
LaneGroupFlow(vph) 125 184 205 248 445
'Ratio 0.39 0.43 0.67 0.20 0.66
ControlDelay(s/veh) 22.0 7.2 35.5 5.0 19.9
[we Delay ‘1 0.0: 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0
TotalDelay (s/veh) 22.0 7.2 35.5 5.0 19.9
leue Length50th(ft) 1 ZZ
QueueLength95th(ft) 61 25 #123 51 167
lernalLinkDist(ft) L32
TurnBayLength(ft) 590 250
lse Capacity(vph)
StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O 0
StorageCapReductn O O O O 0
Reducedv/cRatio 0.19 0.27 0.67 0.20 0.59 — percentilevolumeexceedscapacity,queuemaybe long Queueshownis maximumaftertwocycles.

Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 144 1 180 1 1 1 258 311 3 7 292 125 Peak Hour Factor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 184 389 313 3 87 87 316 853 8 16 361 154
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.19 0.48 0.48 0.01 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1433 1697 780 780 1697 1761 17 1697 1173 502 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 144 1 180 1 0 2 258 0 314 7 0 417
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1433 1697 0 1561 1697 0 1778 1697 0 1676 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 9.1 0.0 6.9 0.3 0.0 14.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 9.1 0.0 6.9 0.3 0.0 14.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 184 389 313 3 0 174 316 0 862 16 0 515 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.57 0.37 0.00 0.01 0.82 0.00 0.36 0.45 0.00 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 436 805 647 164 0 454 709 0 1775 164 0 1134 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.0 19.0 21.7 31.0 0.0 24.6 24.3 0.0 10.0 30.7 0.0 19.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.0 0.0 1.7 66.9 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.3 19.1 0.0 3.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 2.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 2.4 0.2 0.0 5.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 34.0 19.0 23.4 97.9 0.0 24.6 29.4 0.0 10.3 49.7 0.0 22.9 LnGrp LOS C B C F C C B D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 325 3 572 424
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.1 49.0 18.9 23.4
Approach LOS C D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.6 35.1 4.1 18.5 15.6 24.0 10.8 11.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 62.1 6.0 28.1 26.0 42.1 16.0 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.3 8.9 2.0 9.0 11.1 16.3 7.1 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.6 0.7 2.9 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 22.7
HCM 7th LOS C
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tx’\$ J
Lane —Configurations ‘i 1“ i‘Ir "i 12) ‘i 1‘.) "i 1‘;
Effie Volume(veh/h) 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210
FutureVolume(veh/h) 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113 lial Q(Qb),veh 0 Or
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) . . . .00 . . ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No ‘ No a : No
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 [FlowRate,veh/h .. - 1IWI m 1.258 : 311‘. -
7‘292-
PeakHourFactor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 [cent HeavyVeh,-8 8 8Z 8‘ 8. 8Z 8 8E. 8‘ 8l 8-
Cap,veh/h 184 389 313 3 87 87 316 853 8 16 361 154
live OnGreen "" ‘11 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.19 0.48 0.48 0.01 0.31 S_atFlow, veh/h _1697 1781 1433 1697 780 780 1697 1761 17 1697 1173 502 In Volume(v),veh/h" .144 1 180 1 0 2 258 o 314 7 0- GrpSatFIow(s),veh/h/In 1697 1781 1433 1697 O 1561 1697 0 1778 1697 O 1676 [Serve(g_s),s ‘51 0.0 7.0 0.0., 0.0 _ 0.1 9.1 0.O 6.9 0.3- 0.0- CycleQClear(g_c),s 5.1 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 9.1 O.0 0.3 O.0 14.3 [p InLane m _1.00 _1 .00. U. 50 10.0. .0. 01 1.00. - LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 184 389 313 O 174 316 0 862 O 515 E Ratio(X) .-8 0.00 0.57 0.37.100 .001 0.82.000 : 0.36 0.45.0.00- AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 436 805 647 164 0 454 709 O 1775 164 O 1134 [M PlatoonRatio , . ‘0 1.00 1.00 1.00-100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 liform Delay (d),s/veh ‘0_ 19.0 21.7 -31 ._0 0.0 _ 24.6 _24.3-3 0.0=10.0 30.7- 0.0- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 7.O 0.O 1.7 66.9 0.O O.0 0.3 19.1 0.0 3.1 lial QDelay(d3) s/veh “0. (1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (1.0 0.0 Po - %i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.3 5.5 lsig MovementDelay.s/veh. ‘0 02. m.- -. .-. i... .6 0-
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 34.0 19.0 23.4 97.9 0.0 24.6 29.4 O.0 10.3 49.7 22.9 lGrpLOS ApproachVol,veh/h _— 325 3 572 424
EproachDelay,s/veh - 28.1i — 49.0 — 18.9 — 23.

ApproachLOS C D B C
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 4.6 35.1 4.1 18.5 15.6 24.0 10.8 11.8 Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 6.0 62.1 6.0 28.1 26.0 42.1 16.0 18.1 mCIearTime(g_c+I1),s 2.3 8.9 2.0 9.0 11.1 16.3 7.1 2_
GreenExtTime(p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.6 0.7 2.9 0.2 0.0
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 22.7
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 144 1 224 1 2 258 314 7 449
v/c Ratio 0.50 0.00 0.54 0.01 0.01 0.62 0.27 0.05 0.74
Control Delay (s/veh) 38.7 34.0 11.0 43.0 37.0 34.6 7.4 42.2 28.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 38.7 34.0 11.0 43.0 37.0 34.6 7.4 42.2 28.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 0 0 0 0 99 43 3 157
Queue Length 95th (ft) 133 4 26 5 7 202 127 17 273
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 411 759 733 154 438 667 1497 154 1075 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.00 0.39 0.21 0.05 0.42 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
}_,_~,, (*‘x TNL
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 144 1 224 1 2 258 314 7 449
'Ratio 0.50 0.00 0.54 0.01 0.01 0.62 0.27 0.05 0.74 —
ControlDelay(s/veh) 38.7 34.0 11.0 43.0 37.0 34.6 7.4 42.2 28.6 [we Delay '1: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.0 _ 0.0 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 38.7 34.0 11.0 43.0 37.0 34.6 7.4 42.2 28.6 leue Length50th(ft)
QueueLength95th(ft) 133 4 26 5 7 202 127 17 273
lernal LinkDist(ft)
TurnBayLength(ft) 140 500
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O o
mucedv/cRatio ‘5 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.00 0.39 0.21 0.05 0.4_ Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 52 92 162 287 311 94
Future Volume (veh/h) 52 92 162 287 311 94
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 80 174 309 334 82
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Cap, veh/h 193 175 225 1021 540 443
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.56 0.30 0.30
Sat Flow, veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1497
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 80 174 309 334 82
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1497
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 1.4 2.9 2.7 4.7 1.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 1.4 2.9 2.7 4.7 1.2
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 193 175 225 1021 540 443
V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.46 0.77 0.30 0.62 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1026 931 535 1966 1160 951
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.2 12.4 12.6 3.5 9.1 7.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 1.9 5.6 0.2 1.2 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.1 1.2 0.3 1.4 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 13.0 14.3 18.2 3.7 10.2 8.0
LnGrp LOS BBBABA
Approach Vol, veh/h 136 483 416
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.7 8.9 9.8
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.6 8.3 7.9 13.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 18.0 9.2 19.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.7 3.4 4.9 6.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.9 0.3 0.2 1.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.9
HCM 7th LOS A
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
«’w‘x ft 4"
Lane —Configurations ‘1 F ‘1 + + F
fiffic Volume(veh/h) 52 92 162 287 311 94 —
FutureVolume(veh/h) 52 92 162 287 311 94
lial Q(Qb),veh 0I O t 0. 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ld-Bike Adj(A_p) "‘ 1.00'IDO’ - ParkingBus,Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No No
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
IL FlowRate,veh/h .. .5— 80i 174 309 334 — PeakHourFactor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 [centHeavy Wen-5 5 5 5 5 — Cap,veh/h 193 175 225 1021 540 443 live OnGreen~‘.11 0.11 0.13 0.56 0.30 0.30—
SatFlow,veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1497
iDV0|ume(v),veh/h" ‘56 80 174 309 334 8—
GrpSatF|0W(S),Veh/h/|n 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1497
[Serve(g_s)s10 9 1.4 2.9 2-7 4-7 1-—
CycleQClear(g_c),s 1.4 2.9 2.7 4.7 1.2
In InLane 3‘0 1-00 1.00 ; _
LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 193 175 225 1021 540 443
I Ratio(X) I .29 0-46 0-77 0-30 0-62 0—
AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 1026 931 535 1966 1160 951
[M PlatoonRatio -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1—
UpstreamFilter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
liformDelay (d),s/veh.0; 124”12-6 3

5.. 91— IncrDelay (d2), s/veh 1.9 5.6 0.2-1.2 0.2
Iial Q
Delay(d3)s/veh-0-0.2-m--—
%i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.3 0.1 1.2 0.3 1.4 0.3
lsigMovementDelay,s/vehIn. - l . o—
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 13.0 14.3 18.2 3.7 10.2 80.
lGrpLOS ‘—
ApproachVol,veh/h 136 483 416
EproachDelay,s/veh 73.7 _ 8.9 9.8
ApproachLOS B A A
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 21.6 8.3 7.9 13.8
'1ange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 32.2 18.0 9.2 19.0
Ex0ClearTime(g_c+I1),sW4 49 6-7—
GreenExtTime(p_c),s 1.9 0.3 0.2 1.8
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 9.9
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 99 174 309 334 101
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.48 0.25 0.40 0.14
Control Delay (s/veh) 18.8 7.7 22.3 4.5 13.8 3.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 18.8 7.7 22.3 4.5 13.8 3.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 0 38 29 71 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 32 #107 64 141 24
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 2132 750
Turn Bay Length (ft) 590 250 150
Base Capacity (vph) 768 741 400 1409 980 851
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.13 0.44 0.22 0.34 0.12
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
w H «I —LaneGroupFlow(vph) 56 99 174 309 334 101
'Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.48 0.25 0.40 0.14 —
ControlDelay(s/veh) 18.8 7.7 22.3 4.5 13.8 3.7
[we Delay '3: 0.0g 0.0 0.0; 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 18.8 7.7 22.3 4.5 13.8 3.7
leue Length50th(ft) ZQ
QueueLength95th(ft) 41 32 #107 64 141 24
lernalLinkDist(ft) [32
TurnBayLength(ft) 590 250 150
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0
lllback CapReductn m
StorageCapReductn O O O O O 0
Reducedv/cRatio 0.07 0.13 0.44 0.22 0.34 0.12 — percentilevolumeexceedscapacity,queuemaybe long Queueshownis maximumaftertwocycles.

Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66 Future Volume (veh/h) 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 1 216 1 1 4 232 390 2 3 290 71
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 114 373 299 3 42 168 295 802 4 7 389 95
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1431 1697 294 1176 1697 1770 9 1697 1374 336 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 1 216 1 0 5 232 0 392 3 0 361
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1431 1697 0 1470 1697 0 1779 1697 0 1710 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 7.0 0.0 8.3 0.1 0.0 10.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 7.0 0.0 8.3 0.1 0.0 10.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.20
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 114 373 299 3 0 211 295 0 806 7 0 484 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.72 0.32 0.00 0.02 0.79 0.00 0.49 0.43 0.00 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 443 868 697 190 0 497 893 0 2129 190 0 1337 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.5 16.8 19.7 26.7 0.0 19.7 21.2 0.0 10.3 26.6 0.0 17.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.5 0.0 3.3 48.9 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.5 37.6 0.0 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 0.0 2.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 2.9 0.0 2.7 0.1 0.0 3.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 34.1 16.8 23.0 75.6 0.0 19.8 25.8 0.0 10.7 64.2 0.0 19.8 LnGrp LOS C B C E B C B E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 303 6 624 364
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.1 29.1 16.3 20.1
Approach LOS C C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.2 29.2 4.1 16.1 13.3 20.1 7.6 12.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 64.1 6.0 26.1 28.2 41.9 14.0 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 10.3 2.0 9.5 9.0 12.3 4.7 2.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.7 0.6 2.4 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.7
HCM 7th LOS B
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
J43 (*‘K‘x Tx’\i J
Lane —Configurations ‘1 + F "i 1:). ‘1 1‘.) "i
[EffieVolume(veh/h) 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 - FutureVolume(veh/h) 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 lial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 0'—
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) . . . .00 . . ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No 3 3 No I — No3 5
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 [FlowRate,veh/h ‘- 1t 216. 1.1. 4.232 390‘ - 3‘290-
PeakHourFactor 0.93 0.93 O.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 O.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 [cent HeavyVeh,-8_ 8 8 _ 8‘ 8-‘ 8 8 8 _ 8- 8 8-
Cap,veh/h 114 373 299 3 42 168 295 802 4 7 389 95
live OnGreen "" ‘m 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.28 S_atFlow,veh/h _1 697 1781 1431 1697 294 1176 1697 1770 9 1697 1374 336 In Volume(v),veh/h" ..- 86 1 216 1 0 5 232 0 392 3 0- GrpSatF|0W(S),Veh/h/|n 1697 1781 1431 1697 O 1470 1697 0 1779 1697 O 1710 [Serve(g_s),s ‘2] 0.0 7.5 0.0., 0.0 _ 0.2 7.0 0.0 8.3 0.1- 0.0- CycleQ Clear(g_c),s 2.7 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 7.0 0.0 8.3 0.1 0.0 10.3 [p InLane m; _ 1.00 _1.00. .180 1.00. ‘om 1m. - LaneGrpCap(C),veh/h 114 373 299 3 O 211 295 0 806 O 484 I: Ratio(X) .-5 0.00 0.72 0.32.000 [0.02 0.793 0.00: 0.49 0.43.0. 00- AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 443 868 697 190 0 497 893 O 2129 190 O 1337 'M PlatoonRatio -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 _ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 liform Delay (d), s/veh ‘5_ 16.8 _.19 7 _.26 7 O.0 ‘ 19.7 _212; 0.0 _10. 3 26.6_ 0.0- IncrDelay (d2), S/Veh 9.5 0.O 3.3 48.9 0.O 37.6 0.0 2.3 lial Q
Delay(d3)s/veh“0- 0. 0-0.0- 0.0- _0- 0.0 EIO-:I-O- 0-0- 0.0- -9 %i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 1.3 2.7 .9
msig MovementDelay,s/vehnno 02; mi 9‘. CALL. 0- LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 34.1 16.8 23.0 75.6 0.0 19.8 25.8 O.0 10.7 64.219.8 lGrpLOS _'0
ApproachVol,veh/h 303 6 624 364
EproachDelay,s/veh — 26.1 — 29.1 — 16.3 — 20.

ApproachLOS C C B C
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 4.2 29.2 4.1 16.1 13.3 20.1 7.6 12.6 Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 6.0 64.1 6.0 26.1 28.2 41.9 14.0 18.1 mCIearTime(g_c+I1),s 2.1 10.3 2.0 9.5 9.0 12.3 4.7 2_
GreenExtTime(p_c),S 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.7 0.6 2.4 0.1 0.0
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 19.7
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 1 216 1 5 232 392 3 361
v/c Ratio 0.32 0.00 0.55 0.01 0.03 0.55 0.35 0.02 0.65
Control Delay (s/veh) 31.6 30.0 11.4 37.0 26.4 27.7 7.8 35.7 24.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 31.6 30.0 11.4 37.0 26.4 27.7 7.8 35.7 24.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 26 0 0 0 0 67 44 1 97
Queue Length 95th (ft) 103 6 70 7 13 214 215 12 293
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 431 846 787 184 492 868 1634 184 1282 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.00 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.27 0.24 0.02 0.28 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
}_,_~,, (*‘x TNL
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 86 1 216 1 5 232 392 3 361
'Ratio 0.32 0.00 0.55 0.01 0.03 0.55 0.35 0.02 0.65 —
ControlDelay(s/veh) 31.6 30.0 11.4 37.0 26.4 27.7 7.8 35.7 24.6 [we Delay ‘1' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0: 0.0; 0.0 0.0 _ TotalDelay(s/veh) 31.6 30.0 11.4 37.0 26.4 27.7 7.8 35.7 24.6 leue Length50th(ft)
QueueLength95th(ft) 103 6 70 7 13 214 215 12 293
lernal LinkDist(ft)
TurnBayLength(ft) 140 500
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O 0
mucedv/cRatio 10 0.00 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.27 0.24 0.02 0.2_ Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 309 453 516
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 324 475 542
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 467 131 215
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 290 660 391
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 35 35 35
Ped Cap Adj 0.995 0.995 0.995
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.0 7.2 9.2
Approach LOS A A A
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LR LT TR
Assumed Moves LR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 324 475 542
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 857 1207 1108
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.954 0.953 0.952
Flow Entry, veh/h 309 453 516
Cap Entry, veh/h 813 1145 1049
V/C Ratio 0.380 0.395 0.491
Control Delay, s/veh 9.0 7.2 9.2

LOS AAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 2 3
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 8.4
IntersectionLOS A
Lanes 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1
kdjApproachFlow,veh/h _ 309
DemandFlowRate,veh/h 324 475 542
IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.995 0.995 0.995
mroachDelay,swam
ApproachLOS
DesignatedMoves LR LT TR
lsumedMoves LR - —LT ' TR — RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~
A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) Z; — EntryFlow,veh/h 324 475 542
I EntryLane,ve—
EntryHVAdjFactor 0.954 0.953 0.952
”V Entry,veh/h
CapEntry,veh/h 813 1145 1049
IRatio — ControlDelay,s/veh
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.3
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 369 3 572 456
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 399 3 618 493
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 324 771 165 281
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 450 12 558 493
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.6 5.9 9.7 9.5
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 399 3 618 493
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 992 629 1166 1036
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.925 0.975 0.926 0.924
Flow Entry, veh/h 369 3 572 456
Cap Entry, veh/h 916 612 1078 956
V/C Ratio 0.403 0.005 0.531 0.477
Control Delay, s/veh 8.6 5.9 9.7 9.5

LOS AAAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 2033
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 9.3
IntersectionLOS A
Lanes 1 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1 1
kdjApproachFlow,veh/h _ 369
DemandFlowRate,veh/h 399 618 493
IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 mroachDelay,wwwApproachLOS DesignatedMoves LTR LTR LTR LTR
'sumedMoves LTR - LTR - LTR - LTR _ RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~
A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) Z; — EntryFlow,veh/h 399 3 618 493
E EntryLane,ve.

EntryHVAdjFactor 0.925 0.975 0.926 0.924
”V Entry,veh/h" CapEntry,veh/h 916 612 1078 956
IRatio — ControlDelay,s/veh
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 6.9
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 155 483 435
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 163 507 457
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 351 59 183
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 289 455 383
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.6 6.7 7.5
Approach LOS A A A
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LR LT TR
Assumed Moves LR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 163 507 457
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 965 1299 1145
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.951 0.952 0.952
Flow Entry, veh/h 155 483 435
Cap Entry, veh/h 916 1235 1089
V/C Ratio 0.169 0.391 0.400
Control Delay, s/veh 5.6 6.7 7.5

LOS AAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1 2 2
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 6.9
IntersectionLOS A
Lanes 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1
kdjApproachFlow,veh/h
DemandFlowRate,veh/h 163 507 457
IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.999 0.999 0.999
mroachDelay,swam
ApproachLOS
DesignatedMoves LR LT TR
lsumedMoves LR - —LT ' TR — RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~
A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) 2‘. — EntryFlow,veh/h 163 507 457
I EntryLane,ve—
EntryHVAdjFactor 0.951 0.952 0.952
”V Entry,veh/h
CapEntry,veh/h 916 1235 1089
IRatio — ControlDelay,s/veh
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 303 6 624 364
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 327 6 674 393
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 317 765 97 253
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 329 6 547 518
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.4 5.9 9.4 7.6
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 327 6 674 393
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 999 632 1250 1066
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.926 0.988 0.926 0.926
Flow Entry, veh/h 303 6 624 364
Cap Entry, veh/h 924 624 1155 986
V/C Ratio 0.328 0.010 0.540 0.369
Control Delay, s/veh 7.4 5.9 9.4 7.6

LOS AAAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1032
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 8.4
IntersectionLOS A
Lanes 1 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1 1
kdjApproachFlow veh/h
DemandFlowRate,veh/h 327 674 393
IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 mroachDelay,5mm
ApproachLOS
DesignatedMoves LTR LTR LTR LTR
'sumedMoves LTR - LTR - LTR - LTR _ RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~
A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) Z; — EntryFlow,veh/h 327 6 674 393
E EntryLane,veEntryHVAdjFactor 0.926 0.988 0.926 0.926 ”V Entry,veh/h‘ CapEntry,veh/h 924 624 1155 986
IRatio — ControlDelay,s/veh
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 101 165 190 262 412 61
Future Volume (veh/h) 101 165 190 262 412 61
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93
Parking Bus, Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 115 151 216 298 468 55
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Cap, veh/h 254 230 273 1119 654 514
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.61 0.36 0.36
Sat Flow, veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1435
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 115 151 216 298 468 55
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1435
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.5 3.8 4.9 3.1 9.1 1.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.5 3.8 4.9 3.1 9.1 1.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 254 230 273 1119 654 514
V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.66 0.79 0.27 0.72 0.11
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 747 678 381 1431 853 670
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.0 16.5 16.7 3.7 11.4 8.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 3.1 7.5 0.1 2.0 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 3.4 2.2 0.6 3.2 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.2 19.6 24.2 3.8 13.4 8.9
LnGrp LOS B B C A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 266 514 523
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.6 12.4 12.9
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.1 11.0 10.4 19.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 18.0 9.0 19.2
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 5.8 6.9 11.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.8 0.6 0.1 2.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.8
HCM 7th LOS B
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
«’w‘x ft 4"
Lane —Configurations ‘1 F ‘1 + + F
fiffic Volume(veh/h) 101 165 190 262 412 61 —
FutureVolume(veh/h) 101 165 190 262 412 61
lial Q(Qb),veh _ 0: 0' 0. 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ld-Bike Adj(A_p) ’ 1.00[1.00 t '
ParkingBus,Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ink ZoneOnApproach No No
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
I FlowRate,veh/h-, -5 151; 216 298 468 —
PeakHourFactor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
[centHeavy Veni- 5 5 5 5 5 — Cap,veh/h 254 230 273 1119 654 514 live OnGreen "" 10.15 0.15 0.16 0.61 0.36 0.36—
SatFlow,veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1435
iDV0|ume(v),veh/h”i115 151 216 298 468 5—
GrpSatF|0W(S),Veh/h/|n 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1435
[Serve(g_s)s12 5 3.8 4.9 31 91 1-—
CycleQClear(g_c),s 3.8 4.9 3.1 9.1
In InLane 8.0 1-00 1.00 _ i — LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 254 230 273 1119 654 514 I Ratio(X) 8.45 0-66 0-79 0-27E 0-72 _
AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 747 678 381 1431 853 670
[M PlatoonRatio , ‘0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1—
UpstreamFilter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
liformDelay(d).s/veh.13165- — 167i 37:114 — IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 1.3 3.1 7.5 Iial Q
Delay(d3),s/veh-0- ('0 '21 m. 2'—
%i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.9 3.4 .3
lsigMovementDelay,slvehfl‘ ‘2 20- 63. 20—
LnGrpDelay(d) s/veh 17.2 19.6 24.2 3.8 13.4 8.9
lGrpLOS __
ApproachVol,veh/h 266 514 523
EproachDelay,s/veh 13.6 Ti 12.4 12.9
ApproachLOS B B B
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 30.1 11.0 10.4 19.6
'1ange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 32.2 18.0 9.0 19.2
Ex QClearTime(g_c+|1),s
._b-.'|—’—'5.8 6.9 11_
GreenExtTime(p_c),s 1.8 0.6 0.1 2.0
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 13.8
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 188 216 298 468 69
v/c Ratio 0.37 0.45 0.65 0.24 0.67 0.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 21.9 7.4 32.9 5.0 20.2 4.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 21.9 7.4 32.9 5.0 20.2 4.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 32 0 64 32 116 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 69 40 #160 73 #235 20
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 2132 750
Turn Bay Length (ft) 590 250 150
Base Capacity (vph) 657 685 335 1263 753 627
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.27 0.64 0.24 0.62 0.11
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
w H «I —LaneGroupFlow(vph) 115 188 216 298 468 69
'Ratio 0.37 0.45 0.65 0.24 0.67 0.12 —
ControlDelay(s/veh) 21.9 7.4 32.9 5.0 20.2 4.4
[we Delay '2: 0.0 — 0.0 0.0 0.0 —
TotalDelay(s/veh) 21.9 7.4 32.9 5.0 20.2 4.4
leue Length50th(ft) 32.116
QueueLength95th(ft) 69 40 #160 73 #235 20
lernal LinkDist(ft) 132.

TurnBayLength(ft) 590 250 150
lse Capacity(vph) _
StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0
lllback CapReductn m
StorageCapReductn O O O O O 0
Reducedv/cRatio 0.18 0.27 0.64 0.24 0.62 0.11 — percentilevolumeexceedscapacity,queuemaybe long Queueshownis maximumaftertwocycles.

Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139 Future Volume (veh/h) 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 1 201 1 1 1 253 316 2 6 358 158 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 179 369 296 2 80 80 303 944 6 13 422 186
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.53 0.53 0.01 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1431 1697 778 778 1697 1768 11 1697 1162 513 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 1 201 1 0 2 253 0 318 6 0 516
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1431 1697 0 1556 1697 0 1779 1697 0 1675 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.8 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.2 0.0 7.2 0.3 0.0 20.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.8 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.2 0.0 7.2 0.3 0.0 20.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.31
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 179 369 296 2 0 160 303 0 950 13 0 608 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.68 0.42 0.00 0.01 0.83 0.00 0.33 0.45 0.00 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 358 678 545 143 0 396 572 0 1577 143 0 1061 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.1 22.4 26.0 35.5 0.0 28.7 28.2 0.0 9.4 35.2 0.0 20.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.0 2.7 88.2 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.2 21.9 0.0 3.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 0.0 3.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 2.5 0.2 0.0 7.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 38.7 22.4 28.8 123.7 0.0 28.7 34.2 0.0 9.6 57.1 0.0 24.3 LnGrp LOS D C C F C C A E C
Approach Vol, veh/h 344 3 571 522
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.9 60.4 20.5 24.7
Approach LOS C E C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.6 42.9 4.1 19.6 16.7 30.7 11.5 12.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 63.1 6.0 27.1 24.0 45.1 15.0 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.3 9.2 2.0 11.2 12.2 22.2 7.8 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.6 0.6 3.6 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 25.1
HCM 7th LOS C
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
J43 (*‘Kfl Tx’\$ J
Lane —Configurations ‘i 1“ i‘Ir "i 12) ‘i 1‘.) "i 1‘;
[EffieVolume(veh/h) 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315- FutureVolume(veh/h) 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139 lial Q(Qb),veh Or ' LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) . . . .00 . . ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No: : No I — No: Z No
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 [Flow Rate,veh/h.. E 1: 201‘ 1-1; 1.253 316‘ 2. 6a 358- PeakHourFactor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 [cent HeavyVeh,-8 8 8 8‘. 8a 8 8 8 _ 8‘ 8 8- Cap,veh/h 179 369 296 2 8O 80 303 944 6 13 422 186 live OnGreen "" 1.11 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.53 0.53 0.01 0.36 S_atFlow,veh/h _1 697 1781 1431 1697 778 778 1697 1768 11 1697 1162 513 lDVolume(v),veh/h" I142 1 201 1 0 2 253 0 318 6 0- GrpSatFIow(s),veh/h/In 1697 1781 1431 1697 O 1556 1697 0 1779 1697 O 1675 [Serve(g_s),s 15. 8 0.0 9.2 0.0.. 0.0 _ 0.1 10.2 0.0 _ 7.2 0.3 _ 0.0- CycleQ Clear(g_c),s 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.2 0.0 7.2 0.3 0.0 20.2 [p InLane 8.50 1.00 1.00. .0. 50 1.00‘ ‘.01_1.00- - LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 179 369 296 O 160 303 0 950 O 608 I: Ratio(X) . -9 0.00 0.68 0.42-0.00.0.01 0.83g 0.00.033 0.45.0.00- AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 358 678 545 143 0 396 572 O 1577 143 O 1061 [M PlatoonRatio -. .0 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 liform Delay (d), s/veh -J_ 22.4 _26. 0 35.5 0.0 _28. _ 7 28.2_- O.0 . 9.4 _.35 2: 0.0- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 7.6 88.2 0.2 21.9 0.0 3.4
lial Q
Delay(d3),s/veh“0- .0. 0-0- 0-0‘ 0-(3.0- 0.0- §.0 :n0- 0.0- 0.0- - %i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.7 7.8
lsig-MovementDelay,s/vehlz 03‘ w;- LnGrpDelay(d),s/veh 38.7 22.4 28.8 123.7 0.0 28.7 34.2 0.0 9.6 57.1 0.0 24.3 lGrpLOS _
ApproachVol,veh/h 344 3 571 522
EproachDelay,s/veh ‘— 32.9' — 60.4 — 20.5 24.

ApproachLOS C E C C
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 4.6 42.9 4.1 19.6 16.7 30.7 11.5 12.2 Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 6.0 63.1 6.0 27.1 24.0 45.1 15.0 18.1 mCIearTime(g_c+I1),s 2.3 9.2 2.0 11.2 12.2 22.2 7.8 2—
GreenExtTime(p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.6 0.6 3.6 0.2 0.0
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 25.1
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 1 201 1 2 253 318 6 516
v/c Ratio 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.01 0.02 0.63 0.27 0.04 0.77
Control Delay (s/veh) 41.9 36.0 11.4 44.0 38.0 37.4 7.0 43.6 29.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 41.9 36.0 11.4 44.0 38.0 37.4 7.0 43.6 29.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 0 0 1 1 113 46 3 205
Queue Length 95th (ft) 167 6 66 6 9 261 164 19 427
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 355 675 663 142 404 568 1457 142 1069 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.00 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.22 0.04 0.48 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
}_,_~,, (*x TNL
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 142 1 201 1 2 253 318 6 516
'Ratio 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.01 0.02 0.63 0.27 0.04 0.77 —
ControlDelay(s/veh) 41.9 36.0 11.4 44.0 38.0 37.4 7.0 43.6 29.6 [we Delay ‘1," 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0I 0.0: 0.0 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 41.9 36.0 11.4 44.0 38.0 37.4 7.0 43.6 29.6 leue Length50th(ft)
QueueLength95th(ft) 167 6 66 6 9 261 164 19 427
lernal LinkDist(ft)
TurnBayLength(ft) 140 500
lse Capacity(vph) — StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0 0 O 0 lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O O O O 0
mucedv/cRatio ‘0 0.00 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.22 0.04 0.4_ Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 110 206 353 385 100
Future Volume (veh/h) 57 110 206 353 385 100
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 61 94 222 380 414 84
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Cap, veh/h 191 174 286 1101 589 483
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.16 0.60 0.32 0.32
Sat Flow, veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1498
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 61 94 222 380 414 84
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1498
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 2.0 4.2 3.6 6.8 1.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 2.0 4.2 3.6 6.8 1.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 191 174 286 1101 589 483
V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.54 0.78 0.35 0.70 0.17
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 891 809 505 1708 966 792
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.1 14.4 13.8 3.4 10.2 8.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 2.6 4.5 0.2 1.5 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.1 1.7 0.5 2.2 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.0 17.0 18.3 3.6 11.8 8.5
LnGrp LOS BBBABA
Approach Vol, veh/h 155 602 498
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.2 9.0 11.2
Approach LOS B A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.7 8.8 9.7 16.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 18.0 10.0 18.2
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 4.0 6.2 8.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.4 0.3 0.2 2.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.8
HCM 7th LOS B
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
«’w‘x ft 4"
Lane —Configurations ‘1 F ‘1 if if F
fiffic Volume(veh/h) 57 110 206 353 385 100 —
FutureVolume(veh/h) 57 110 206 353 385 100
lial Q(Qb),veh 0 Z 0E 0. 0
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ld-Bike Adj(A_p) "‘ 1.00(1.00 g ’
ParkingBus,Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ink ZoneOnApproach No No
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
[FlowRataveh/h .. .1— 94: 222 380 414 — PeakHourFactor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 [centHeavy Vern-5 5 5 5 5 — Cap,veh/h 191 174 286 1101 589 483 live OnGreen “‘11 0.11 0.16 0.60 0.32 0.32—
SatFlow,veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1498
inVolume(v),veh/h" -61 94 222 380 414 84—
GrpSatF|0W(S),Veh/h/|n 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1498
IServe(g_s),s ‘4 2-0 4-2 3-6 6-8 1-_
CycleQ Clear(g_c),s 1.1 2.0 4.2 3.6 6.8 1.4
In InLane “9.1.00 1.00 _ _
LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 191 174 286 1101 589 483
I Ratio(X) "2 0-54 0-78 0-35 0-70 0-—
AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 891 809 505 1708 966 792
[M PlatoonRatio, -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.—
UpstreamFilter(l) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
liformDelay(d).s/veh-J_14-4 .138 - 3-4-102_
IncrDelay (d2), s/veh 0.9 2.6 4.5 0.2 1.5 0.2
lial Q
Delay(d3),s/veh (.2 min-—
%i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 0.4 0.1 1.7 05 22 03
msig.MovementDelay.s/veh an A n ' 2 ' — LnGrpDelay(d),s/veh 15.0 17.0 18.3 3.6 11.8 8.5 lGrpLOS __
ApproachVol,veh/h 155 602 498
EproachDelay,s/veh 76.2 — 9.0 11.2
ApproachLOS B A B
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 25.7 8.8 9.7 16.0
'1ange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 32.2 18.0 10.0 18.2
ExQCIearTime(g_c+I1),s"_fl-’-10 6.2 83—
GreenExtTime(p_c),s 2.4 0.3 0.2 2.0
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 10.8
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 61 118 222 380 414 108
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.36 0.63 0.30 0.58 0.17
Control Delay (s/veh) 20.5 8.2 28.3 4.6 17.0 3.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 20.5 8.2 28.3 4.6 17.0 3.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 0 59 38 96 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 43 35 #149 83 188 25
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 2132 750
Turn Bay Length (ft) 590
Base Capacity (vph) 653 657 370 1332 759 687
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.18 0.60 0.29 0.55 0.16
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved Tl¥
02/13/2026
lllback CapReductn m
Queues
J“
x "\
LaneGroupFlow(vph) 61 118 222 380 414
'Ratio 0.24 0.36 0.63 0.30 0.58
ControlDelay(s/veh) 20.5 8.2 28.3 4.6 17.0
[we Delay '1" 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 20.5 8.2 28.3 4.6 17.0
leue Length50th(ft) .33.

QueueLength95th(ft) 43 35 #149 83 188
lernalLinkDist(ft) 92
TurnBayLength(ft) 590
lse Capacity(vph)
StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O 0
StorageCapReductn O O O O 0
Reducedv/cRatio 0.09 0.18 0.60 0.29 0.55 — percentilevolumeexceedscapacity,queuemaybe long Queueshownis maximumaftertwocycles.

Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106 Future Volume (veh/h) 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 135 1 202 1 1 4 260 482 2 3 404 114 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 171 361 290 2 30 120 311 956 4 7 478 135
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1430 1697 289 1158 1697 1772 7 1697 1329 375 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 135 1 202 1 0 5 260 0 484 3 0 518
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1430 1697 0 1447 1697 0 1780 1697 0 1703 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.5 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 10.4 0.0 12.1 0.1 0.0 19.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.5 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 10.4 0.0 12.1 0.1 0.0 19.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.22
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 171 361 290 2 0 150 311 0 960 7 0 613 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.70 0.42 0.00 0.03 0.84 0.00 0.50 0.44 0.00 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 660 529 144 0 372 582 0 1618 144 0 1109 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.0 22.4 26.1 35.2 0.0 28.4 27.8 0.0 10.3 35.0 0.0 20.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.9 0.0 3.0 86.4 0.0 0.1 5.9 0.0 0.4 38.2 0.0 3.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 0.0 3.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 4.5 0.0 4.2 0.1 0.0 7.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 38.9 22.4 29.1 121.6 0.0 28.5 33.6 0.0 10.7 73.2 0.0 24.0 LnGrp LOS D C C F C C B E C
Approach Vol, veh/h 338 6 744 521
Approach Delay, s/veh 33.0 44.0 18.7 24.3
Approach LOS C D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.3 42.9 4.1 19.2 16.9 30.3 11.1 12.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 64.1 6.0 26.1 24.2 45.9 14.0 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 14.1 2.0 11.2 12.4 21.7 7.5 2.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.6 0.6 3.7 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 23.6
HCM 7th LOS C
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
J43 (*‘Kfl Tx’\i J
Lane —Configurations ‘i 1“ i‘Ir "i 12) ‘i 1‘.) "i 1‘;
[EffieVolume(veh/h) 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376- FutureVolume(veh/h) 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106 lial Q(Qb),veh 0 0 I 0 I
LaneWidthAdj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ld-Bike Adj(A_p) .95 . .92 I .00] . . ParkingBus,Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ink ZoneOnApproach No5 : No : No3 g No
AdjSatFlow,veh/h/In 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 [FlowRate,veh/h .. — 1K 202‘ 1‘ 1- 4.260 _ 482‘ D 33404- PeakHourFactor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 [cent HeavyVeh,—8 8 8 8I 8a 8 8 8 _ 8; 8 8- Cap,veh/h 171 361 290 2 30 120 311 956 4 7 478 135 live OnGreen "" ‘10 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.36- S_atFlow,veh/h _1697 1781 1430 1697 289 1158 1697 1772 7 1697 1329 375 In Volume(v),veh/h" .135 1 202 1 0 5 260 0 484 3 0- GrpSatFIow(s),veh/h/In 1697 1781 1430 1697 O 1447 1697 0 1780 1697 O 1703 [Serve(g_s),3 ‘55 0.0 9.2 0.0.. 0.0 _ 0.2 10.4 0.0 12.1 0.1- 0.0- CycleQ Clear(g_c),s 5.5 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 10.4 0.0 12.1 0.1 0.0 19.7 [p InLane 3;“— 1.00 1.00. .0. 80 1.00. ‘000 1.0- - LaneGrpCap(c),veh/h 171 361 290 O 150 311 0 960 O 613 I: Ratio(X) .-9 0.00 0.70 0.42-0.00[0.03 0.84[ 0.00 - 0.50 0.44.0. 00- AvailCap(c_a),veh/h 337 660 529 144 0 372 582 O 1618 144 0 1109 [M PlatoonRatio M -0 1.00 1.00 1.00 -100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00- UpstreamFilter(|) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 O.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 liformDelay (d),s/veh ‘o_ 22.4 _ 26.1 35.2_ 0.0.28. 4 _27.8_— 0.0 _.10 — 3 _35.0_ 0.0- IncrDelay (d2),s/veh 7.9 86.4 5.9 0.4 38.2 0.0 3.3
lial Q
Delay(d3),s/veh.‘0- 0. 0-0.0- 0. 0-8-0- 0.0- P0 ECO0.0- 0.0- (_78 %i|eBackOfQ(50%),veh/In 2.5
I‘SiQ-MovementDelay,s/veh‘ ‘0 03‘ W“A-‘-
LnGrpDelay(d),s/veh 38.9 22.4 29.1 121.6 0.0 28.5 33.6 O.0 10.7 73.2 24.0 lGrpLOS _
ApproachVol,veh/h 338 6 744 521
EproachDelay,s/veh " 33.0: — 44.0 — 18.7 — 24
ApproachLOS C D B C
PhsDuration(G+Y+Rc),s 4.3 42.9 4.1 19.2 16.9 30.3 11.1 12.2 Iange Period(Y+Rc),s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9
MaxGreenSetting(Gmax),s 6.0 64.1 6.0 26.1 24.2 45.9 14.0 18.1 mCIearTime(g_c+I1),s 2.1 14.1 2.0 11.2 12.4 21.7 7.5 2_ GreenExtTime(p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.6 0.6 3.7 0.2 0.0
HCM7thControlDelay,s/veh 23.6
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 135 1 253 1 5 260 484 3 518
v/c Ratio 0.51 0.00 0.59 0.01 0.04 0.64 0.41 0.02 0.78
Control Delay (s/veh) 42.5 36.0 11.8 44.0 30.8 37.1 8.2 44.0 30.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 42.5 36.0 11.8 44.0 30.8 37.1 8.2 44.0 30.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 61 0 0 1 1 114 78 1 208
Queue Length 95th (ft) #177 6 81 7 14 #283 282 12 451
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 332 653 680 142 380 575 1474 142 1107 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.00 0.37 0.01 0.01 0.45 0.33 0.02 0.47 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Queues
Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved
}_,_~,, (*x
Lane —GroupFlow(vph) 135 1 253 1 5 260
'Ratio 0.51 0.00 0.59 0.01 0.04 0.64
ControlDelay(s/veh) 42.5 36.0 11.8 44.0 30.8 37.1
[we Delay “" _ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0’ 0.0
TotalDelay(s/veh) 42.5 36.0 11.8 44.0 30.8 37.1
leue Length50th(ft) [1
QueueLength95th(ft) #177 6 81 7 14 #283
lernalLinkDist(ft) k
TurnBayLength(ft) 140 500
lse Capacity(vph)
StarvationCapReductn 0 O O O O 0
lllback CapReductn
StorageCapReductn O O O O O 0
Reducedv/cRatio 0.41 0.00 0.37 0.01 0.01 0.45 — percentilevolumeexceedscapacity,queuemaybe long Queueshownis maximumaftertwocycles.
02/13/2026
T‘rl
00 3 518
0-02 0-78 — 44.0 30.0
4410 30.0
12 451
O 0
O O

0.02 0.47
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.9
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 303 514 537
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 318 540 563
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 491 121 227
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 299 688 434
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 35 35 35
Ped Cap Adj 0.995 0.995 0.995
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.2 7.8 9.7
Approach LOS A A A
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LR LT TR
Assumed Moves LR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 318 540 563
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 836 1220 1095
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.953 0.952 0.953
Flow Entry, veh/h 303 514 537
Cap Entry, veh/h 793 1156 1038
V/C Ratio 0.382 0.445 0.517
Control Delay, s/veh 9.2 7.8 9.7

LOS AAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 2 3
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 8.9
IntersectionLOS A
Lanes 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1
[dj ApproachFlow,veh/h _ 303 - 514
DemandFlowRate,veh/h 318 540 563
IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.995 0.995 0.995
mroachDelay,mam
ApproachLOS
DesignatedMoves LR LT TR
lsumedMoves LR - —LT ' TR — RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~
A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) 1. — EntryFlow,veh/h 318 540 563
I EntryLane,ve—
EntryHVAdjFactor 0.953 0.952 0.953
”V Entry,veh/h
CapEntry,veh/h 793 1156 1038
IRatio — ControlDelay,s/veh
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.9
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 344 3 571 522
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 371 3 616 564
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 394 767 160 275
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 445 9 605 495
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.0 5.9 9.6 10.8
Approach LOS AAAB
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 371 3 616 564
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 923 631 1172 1042
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.927 0.975 0.927 0.926
Flow Entry, veh/h 344 3 571 522
Cap Entry, veh/h 855 615 1084 964
V/C Ratio 0.402 0.005 0.526 0.542
Control Delay, s/veh 9.0 5.9 9.6 10.8

LOS AAAB
95th %tile Queue, veh 2033
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 9.9
IntersectionLOS A
Lanes 1 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1 1
kdj ApproaCh FIOW veh/h M 571
DemandFlowRate,veh/h 371 616 564
IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 mroachDelay,5mm
ApproachLOS
DesignatedMoves LTR LTR LTR LTR
'sumedMoves LTR - LTR - LTR - LTR _ RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~
A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) 3.. — EntryFlow,veh/h 371 3 616 564
I EntryLane,ve‘—
EntryHVAdjFactor 0.927 0.975 0.927 0.926
”V Entry,veh/h
CapEntry,veh/h 855 615 1084 964
IRatio — ControlDelay,s/veh 10.8
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.5
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 179 602 522
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 188 632 548
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 435 64 233
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 346 559 463
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.5 8.2 9.5
Approach LOS A A A
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LR LT TR
Assumed Moves LR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 188 632 548
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 885 1293 1088
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.952 0.953 0.953
Flow Entry, veh/h 179 602 522
Cap Entry, veh/h 842 1230 1036
V/C Ratio 0.213 0.490 0.504
Control Delay, s/veh 6.5 8.2 9.5

LOS AAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1 3 3
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 8.5
IntersectionLOS A
Lanes 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1
kdjApproachFlow,veh/h _ 179
DemandFlowRate,veh/h 188 632 548
IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.999 0.999 0.999
mroachDelay,s/vehW
ApproachLOS
DesignatedMoves LR LT TR
lsumedMoves LR - —LT ' TR — RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~
A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) 2. — EntryFlow,veh/h 188 632 548
E EntryLane,veEntryHVAdjFactor 0.952 0.953 0.953
”V Entry,veh/h
CapEntry,veh/h 842 1230 1036
IRatio — ControlDelay,s/veh
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.0
Intersection LOS B
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 389 6 744 521
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 420 6 804 562
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 440 948 150 283
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 405 6 710 671
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 1.000 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.8 7.1 13.4 10.9
Approach LOS BABB
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 420 6 804 562
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 881 525 1184 1034
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.926 0.988 0.926 0.927
Flow Entry, veh/h 389 6 744 521
Cap Entry, veh/h 815 518 1095 957
V/C Ratio 0.477 0.011 0.680 0.544
Control Delay, s/veh 10.8 7.1 13.4 10.9

LOS BABB
95th %tile Queue, veh 3063
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
IntersectionDelay,s/veh 12.0
IntersectionLOS B
Lanes 1 1 1 1
ConflictingCircleLanes 1 1 1 1
kdj ApproaCh FIOW VGh/h M 744
DemandFlowRate,veh/h 420 804 562
IhiclesCirculating veh/h—
VehiclesExiting, veh/h
‘d VolCrossingLeg,
PedCapAdj 0.999 1.000 0.999 0.999
mroachDelay,s/veh’ m m
ApproachLOS B A B B
DesignatedMoves LTR LTR LTR LTR
'sumedMoves LTR - LTR - LTR - LTR _ RTChannelized
me Util
Follow-UpHeadway,3 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
[cal Headway,~ , A(Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
Ilope) Z; — EntryFlow,veh/h 420 6 804 562
E EntryLane,ve'
EntryHVAdjFactor 0.926 0.988 0.926 0.927
”V Entry,veh/h' CapEntry,veh/h 815 518 1095 957
IRatio 71—
ControlDelay,s/veh 10.8 13.4 10.9
95th%tileQueue,veh
Synchro 12 Report
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX F

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ANALYSIS
TRAFFICSTUDY — PROPOSEDRESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX F

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ANALYSIS

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP

A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION
Tool Version: Report Date: 6/8/2026
Name:

Jurisdiction
TAZ ID
Single-family: 271 DU Multi-family: 0 DU
Total: 271 DU Percent Affordable: 0 %
Non-Residential Office: 0 EMP Others: TSF
Included
in the project TDM Quantification
% VMT/Capita
Reduction
% VMT/Employment
Reduction
No N/A
No N/A

10.3 County VMT / Capita: 16.1
Significant Impact: No

11.5 County VMT / Employee: 25.7
Significant Impact: No
Project VMT per Capita with TDM
Measures:

Significant Impact with
TDM measures:

11.5 No
Project's VMT/Employee (11.5) is less than County's VMT/Employee (22.4 using 13% as threshold) Project VMT per Employee:

Project VMT Results
Residential
Project's VMT/Capita (10.3) is less than County VMT/Capita (14.0 using 13% as threshold) Project VMT per Capita:

Office
Project VMT per Capita with TDM
Measures:

10.3 Significant Impact with
TDM measures: No
Project TDM measures (VMT reduction strategies)
Fresno COG Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Tool Summary Report Version 1.38
Project Information
Crown Homes
Mendota
1701
Project Land Use
Residential
TDM Strategy
Implement Project Specific Vanpool Program
Implement Project Specific Carpool Program

12.9 10.3 10.3

13.2 16.1
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
TAZ Project Project + TDM
VMT per Capita
County Average

11.5 11.5 11.5

25.7 0
5 10
15 20
25 30
35 40
TAZ Project Project + TDM
VMT per Employee
County Average
- I O - - - - - ‘ I o ' ‘ 0
Fresno Council of Governments Tool Version: Version 1.38 Report Date: 6/8/2026 | ProjectInformation
A Name: Crown Homes
Jurisdiction Mendota TAZ ID 1701
Single-family: 271 DU Multi-family: 0 DU
Residential Total: 271 DU Percent Affordable: O %
Non-Residential Office: 0 EMP Others: TSF
Included %VMT/Capita %VMT/Employment
TDM Strategy in the project TDM Quantification Reduction Reduction Implement Project Specific Vanpool Program No N/A
Implement Project Specific Carpool Program No N/A
|
Residential
Project'sVMT/Capita (10.3)is lessthan CountyVMT/Capita (14.0using 13% as threshold) 35 30 Project VMT per Capita: 10.3
25 County VMT/ Capita: 16.1
L3 20
a. 16.1 8 15 — - SignificantImpact: No
Lg. 10 — —
l-; 5 _ — — — ProjectVMTperCapitawithTDM 10,3 Measures: 0 _ — — — TAZ Project Project+ TDM CountyAverage — — . Significant Impact with TDM measures: No Office Project'sVMT/ Employee(11.5)is lessthan County'sVMT/ Employee(22.4 using 13% as threshold) 40 35 Project VMT per Employee: 11.5
30 8 25.7
2 25 a. E 20
I: SignificantImpact: No
a; 15 —
a. E 10 — — — —
> 5 _ — — _ Project VMT per Capita with TDM 11_5 Measures: 0 _ _ — TAZ Project Project + TDM — —-CountyAverage SignificantImpact with TDM measures: No
“Exhibit C” TO RESOLUTION NO. 26-71
Prezone Map and Annexation Area
Attachment 9: Ordinance No. 26-04
1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE

CITY OF MENDOTA, COUNTY OF FRESNO
ORDINANCE NO. 26-04

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA AMENDING

THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA TO REFLECT A CHANGE OF ZONE FOR ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 012-190-25ST AND 012-160-25ST NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Mendota does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. The Planning Commission and City Council of Mendota have duly noticed and held public hearings for the Tract No. 6541 Project, which proposes to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Mendota to prezone portions of Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 012-190-25ST and 012-0160-25ST.

SECTION 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Mendota is hereby amended to designate APN 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST to the R-1 and P-F zone districts as depicted in Exhibit “A” and attached hereto, respectfully.

SECTION 3. Based on the testimony and information presented at the public hearings held for the Tract No. 6541 Project, the City Council has determined that the amendment of the Official Zoning Map of the City of Mendota as proposed under the Tract No. 6541 Project has no potential to impact the environment, with mitigation incorporated as a part of the Project. Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070 through 15075, an Initial Study was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the Project. Based on the analysis contained in the Initial Study, it was determined that the Project would not result in significant adverse environmental effects with the incorporation of mitigation measures. The City Council has further determined that the amendment of the Official Zoning Map of the City of Mendota is in the best interest of the City of Mendota.

SECTION 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held for any reason to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Mendota hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and will see that it is published and posted in the manner required by law. 2 SECTION 6. This ordinance shall become effective and in full force at 12:00 midnight on the 31st day following its adoption.
* * * * * * * * * *
The foregoing ordinance was introduced on the 6th day of October, 2026, and duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of October, 2026, and its amendments are made retroactively effective as of the effective date of Ordinance No. 26-04, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________
Victor Martinez, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
John Kinsey, City Attorney
3 “Exhibit A” TO Ordinance No. 2026-04
Prezone Map and Annexation Area

City Engineer Update Memo
To: City Council via Cristian, City Manager
From: Kevin Gross, City Engineer
Date: 10/6/2026
Streets

1. Naples Street improvements (STBG)
a. Civil design at 60% complete.
b. Council presentation prior to bidding phase in Spring 2027. c. Target construction window (Summer 2027)

2. 7
th Street Rehab Project (STBG)
a. Civil design at 30% complete. Downtown Design Feature (Shade structures at benches, additional landscape, lighting improvements, ADA upgrades) b. Received lighting quote for solar lighting (18 additional lights) c. Target construction window (Fall 2027)

3. Alley Repaving Project (CMAQ)
a. Civil design underway. PS&E target completion by Winter 2026/ 2027 b. Target construction window (Spring 2027)

4. Welcome Sign Reconstruction
a. Alternative 1 chosen by council.
b. Waiting on quote for fabrication of aluminum frame.
i. Need to coordinate with masonry exterior work.
c. Caltrans coordination to begin once dimensions are established.

5. Safe Routes to School 2026/2027
a. Beginning topo survey. Construction in summer 2027.
b. Includes:
• 11,000 square feet of new concrete sidewalk
• 1 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB)
• Tra;ic Signing, Striping, and Pavement Markings
• 12’ Wide Raised Concrete Median with Landscaping
• 25 accessible curb ramps

6. Smoot Avenue Improvements
a. Survey topo in process.
b. Construction target completion prior to Community Center opening.

Parks

1. Airport Park Phase 1 PS&E (4 acres)
a. Phase 1 design to begin September 2026.
b. NEPA process underway.

2. Airport Park Master Plan (27 acres)
a. Council presentation in fall 2026 on preliminary layout and design features. b. Design to begin October 2026.

Planning

1. Mendota MSR
a. MSR underway. Target for LAFCO submittal November 2026.

2. CA-33 & Lozano St Development
a. Pre application review packet sent to Bottom Line on 8/17/2026.

3. M-1 to R-3 Rezone
a. Planning review underway.
b. Public hearings expected October – December 2026.

4. MS4 Waiver – Water Board
a. Application submittal target date on Oct 2, 2026.

Grant Applications

1. SS4A Grant Application
a. Submitted 5/26/2026 for $312,500
b. Corridor study for Belmont Avenue

2. ATP Application (Derrick Ave Pedestrian Improvement) a. Submittal on June 22, 2026, for $1,330,360
b. Includes HAWK ped crossing at 6th street, RRFB’s at 5th Street and Median Island Refuge in front of McCabe Elementary

3. Urban Greening Grant (Airport Park)
a. Due September 4, 2026
b. Funding for the perimeter walking trail and shade trees for the trail limits. (Approx 56,800 SF of trail – 1.07 miles)
c. Up to $5 million available

4. Local Highway Safety Improvements (HSIP)
a. Due November 2, 2026
b. Funding safety improvements on public roads.
c. Min award $100,000

5. Extreme Heat Grant
a. Due October 13, 2026
b. Funding for shade structures at Pool Park.
c. Funding Request : $1 million
On Going

1. Attending FCOG TTC

2. Working with Townsend for upcoming grant applications

3. Coordination e;orts with Community Center

← All documents from this meeting