Agenda packet — Mendota City Council, October 6, 2026 (part 1 of 5)

City Council Meeting Agenda 1 October 6, 2026

CITY OF MENDOTA

CITY COUNCIL

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
City Council Chambers
725 Riofrio Street
Mendota, California 93640
Tuesday, October 6, 2026
6:00 PM
____________________________________________________________________________________ The Mendota City Council welcomes your attendance and participation. Regular City Council meetings are generally held on the first and third Tuesday of each month. In accordance with the California Ralph M. Brown Act, the City Council may discuss and take action on any item listed on this agenda, unless otherwise noted. Members of the public are encouraged to participate at the designated times during the meeting. Please silence all electronic devices while the meeting is in session. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation.

Any writings or documents related to an open session agenda item that are distributed to a majority of the City Council after the posting of the agenda will be available for public inspection at Mendota City Hall, 643 Quince Street, Mendota, California 93640, during regular business hours, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and at the meeting to the extent required by law.

Such writings and documents will also be made available on the City's website at www.cityofmendota.com. Requests for copies of agenda materials or other public writings may be made in person at City Hall, by telephone at (559) 655-3291 or (559) 577- 7692, or by email at [email protected].

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), individuals requiring special accommodations or auxiliary aids to participate in this meeting should contact the City Clerk's Office at (559) 655-3291, (559) 577-7692, or [email protected] at least 48 hours prior to the meeting, whenever possible, so that reasonable arrangements can be made to ensure accessibility.

Levine Act Disclosure: Pursuant to California Government Code section 84308, parties to a proceeding involving a license, permit, contract, franchise, or other entitlement for use, and their agents, must disclose campaign contributions of more than $500 made within the preceding twelve (12) months to any member of the City Council. Certain contributions may require a City Council Member to disqualify themselves from participating in the decision. Parties and participants are encouraged to consult Government Code section 84308 regarding the Levine Act's disclosure and campaign contribution requirements.

Remote Meeting Participation (Zoom Webinar): Members of the public may observe and participate in this meeting remotely via Zoom Webinar. To join the meeting, use the link or Webinar ID and Passcode provided below, or visit the City's website at www.cityofmendota.com for access information.

For privacy and security, attendees' cameras and microphones will remain off during the meeting. Public comments may be made during the designated public comment periods by selecting the "Raise Hand" feature in Zoom. Participants joining by telephone may raise their hand by pressing *9. When recognized by the Mayor, the meeting host will enable your microphone so that you may provide your comments. Telephone participants may unmute by pressing *6, if prompted. Public comments will be limited to the time established by the City Council.

Zoom Webinar Information:
• Webinar Link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88110618411?pwd=M9Ra5eJTOMfVPfXoH5kAbpH3eSbtLn.1 • Webinar ID: 881 1061 8411
• Passcode: 036033
• Dial-In Number: +1 (408) 638-0968
Servicios de Interpretación: Los servicios de interpretación al español estarán disponibles únicamente para las personas que asistan a la reunión en persona. Las personas que requieran servicios de interpretación u otras adaptaciones razonables para participar en la reunión deberán comunicarse con la Oficina de la Secretaria de la Ciudad al (559) 655-3291, (559) 577-7692, o por correo electrónico a [email protected], con al menos 24 horas de anticipación, cuando sea posible, para que el personal pueda realizar los arreglos necesarios. Los servicios de interpretación no estarán disponibles para los participantes que asistan de forma remota.

VICTOR MARTINEZ
Mayor

JOSE ALONSO
Mayor Pro Tempore
LIBERTAD “LIBERTY” LOPEZ

JESSE LUA MENDOZA
JOSEPH R. RIOFRIO

CRISTIAN GONZALEZ
City Manager

JOHN KINSEY
City Attorney
Mendota City Hall, 643 Quince Street, Mendota, California 93640 Telephone: (559) 655-3291 | Fax: (559) 655-4064
TDD/TTY: (866) 735-2919 (English) | (866) 833-4703 (Spanish) Website: www.cityofmendota.com
The City of Mendota is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

City Council Meeting Agenda 2 October 6, 2026

CITY OF MENDOTA
Regular City Council Meeting – October 6, 2026
___________________________________________________________________________

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

FLAG SALUTE

INVOCATION

FINALIZE THE AGENDA

1. Adjustments to Agenda

2. Adoption of final Agenda

MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

1. Council Members

2. Mayor

PUBLIC COMMENT
At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda that is within the jurisdiction of the City Council. Individuals attending in person who wish to speak are asked to complete a "Request to Speak" form and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the start of the meeting. Individuals participating remotely may request to speak by using the "Raise Hand" feature in Zoom or by pressing *9 if participating by telephone. When recognized, remote participants will be unmuted to provide their comments. Public comments are limited to THREE (3) MINUTES per speaker. All speakers shall observe proper decorum. The Mendota Municipal Code prohibits the use of boisterous, slanderous, or profane language. In-person speakers must step to the podium and state their name and address for the record. Please be mindful of the time limit.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING

1. Minutes of the regular City Council meeting of September 15, 2026.

2. Notice of waiving of the reading of all resolutions and/or ordinances introduced and/or adopted under this agenda.

CONSENT CALENDAR
Matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion and one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired, that item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and will be considered separately.

1. SEPTEMBER 9, 2026 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 24, 2026
a. WARRANT LIST CHECK NOS. 058461-058545, 26PP19-26PP20, 1007-1009 b. TOTAL FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL = $2,505,311.94

2. Proposed adoption of Resolution No. 26-68, awarding the construction contract for the 5th & Quince Street Reconstruction Project to Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $663,797.00.

City Council Meeting Agenda 3 October 6, 2026

3. Proposed adoption of Resolution No. 26-69, awarding the construction contract for the Amador & Smoot Extension Project to Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $666,630.00.

4. Proposed adoption of Resolution No. 26-70, authorizing the purchase of one (1) Chevrolet Silverado Heavy Duty 2500 truck from Winner Chevrolet, Inc. through California Department of General Services Statewide Contract No. 1-22-23-20D, with upfitting by Cook’s Communications, in an amount not to exceed $116,634.00, for use in support of the Mendota Police Department DUI Command Post.

PUBLIC HEARING

1. City Council discussion and consideration of Resolution No. 26-71, approving a General Plan Amendment (GPA), annexation, Planned Development, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) for the Tract No. 6541 Project, initiating and waiving the first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 26-04, prezoning the Project site to the R-1 and PF zone district, and adoption of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that such approvals would not result in significant adverse environmental effects. a. Receive report from City Planner O’Neal
b. Inquiries from City Council to staff
c. Mayor Martinez opens the public hearing
d. Once all comments have been received, Mayor Martinez closes the public hearing
e. City Council considers adoption of Resolution No. 26-71, and waives the first reading of Ordinance No. 26-04

BUSINESS

1. City Council discussion and consideration of a presentation regarding the Mendota Downtown Enhancement project.
a. Receive presentation from City Engineer Gross
b. Inquiries from City Council to staff
c. Mayor Martinez opens floor to receive any comment from the public d. City Council provides input

DEPARTMENT REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

1. City Engineer
a) Update

2. City Attorney

3. City Manager
City Council Meeting Agenda 4 October 6, 2026

CLOSED SESSION

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION a. Potential exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Government Code section 54956.9 (one potential case).

ADJOURNMENT

CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I, Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk of the City of Mendota, hereby certify that the foregoing agenda for the Regular Meeting of the Mendota City Council to be held on Tuesday, October 6, 2026, was posted on Friday, October 2, 2026, no later than 5:00 p.m., on the bulletin board located at Mendota City Hall, 643 Quince Street, Mendota, California 93640, at the City Council Chambers, 725 Riofrio Street, Mendota, California 93640, and on the City's official website at www.cityofmendota.com. /s/ Celeste Cabrera-Garcia Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk Minutes of City Council Meeting 1 September 15, 2026

MINUTES OF MENDOTA

REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Regular Meeting September 15, 2026
Meeting called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Alonso at 6:04 PM Roll Call
Council Members Present: Mayor Pro Tem Jose Alonso, and Council Members Libertad “Liberty” Lopez, Jesus “Jesse” Mendoza
and Joseph R. Riofrio
Council Members Absent: Mayor Victor Martinez
Flag salute led by Mayor Pro Tem Alonso
Invocation led by Police Chaplain Robert Salinas
A moment of silence was held in remembrance of those who lost their lives in the September 11, 2001 attacks and in honor of those affected by suicide.

FINALIZE THE AGENDA

1. Adjustments to Agenda.

2. Adoption of final Agenda.

A motion was made by Council Member Riofrio to adopt the agenda, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Alonso; unanimously approved (4 ayes, absent: Martinez).

MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

1. Council Members
Council Member Riofrio thanked those in attendance; wished Council Member Lopez a happy birthday; and thanked her for work in supporting mental health.

Minutes of City Council Meeting 2 September 15, 2026
Council Member Lopez thanked those in attendance; thanked everyone for their patience during ongoing construction in the City; commented on the recent vandalism that took place in the City, including thanking Chief of Police Renteria for his response; the month of September being National Suicide Prevention Awareness Month; and shared information regarding mental health and suicide prevention.

Council Member Mendoza thanked those in attendance; thanked everyone for their patience during ongoing construction in the City; wished Council Member Lopez a happy birthday; and wished his younger brother a happy birthday.

Mayor Pro Tem Alonso commented on Congressman Adam Gray’s ceremonial check presentation for the Community Center Project; thanked the Mendota Police Department for their response to the recent vandalism in the City; wished Council Member Lopez a happy birthday; and wished everyone a happy Hispanic Heritage Month.

PUBLIC COMMENT
Yolanda Perez stated that she is assisting a community member with renewing her passport so that she can return to her home country and inquired whether the City Council could provide any assistance.

Discussion was held on the comments shared by Ms. Perez.

At 6:37 p.m. the City Council went into a brief recess.

At 6:59 p.m. the City Council reconvened its meeting.

PUBLIC COMMENT (CONTINUED)
Maria Hernandez commented on matters related to a mobile home park, including concerns regarding its potential closure and what assistance the City may be able to provide to affected residents.

Discussion was held regarding the concerns raised by Ms. Hernandez.

Lupe Flores thanked the City Council, City Manager Gonzalez, Chief Renteria, and Police Chaplain Salinas for their work and wished Council Member Lopez a happy birthday.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES AND NOTICE OF WAIVING OF READING

1. Minutes of the regular City Council meeting of September 1, 2026.

2. Notice of waiving of the reading of all resolutions and/or ordinances introduced and/or adopted under this agenda.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alonso to approve items 1 and 2, seconded by Minutes of City Council Meeting 3 September 15, 2026
Council Member Lopez; unanimously approved (4 ayes, absent: Martinez).

CONSENT CALENDAR

1. SEPTEMBER 1, 2026 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 4, 2026
a. WARRANT LIST CHECK NOS. 58414-58460
b. TOTAL FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL = $1,064,059.01

2. Proposed adoption of Resolution No. 26-64, approving the proposal from Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. for professional engineering design services for the Mendota 2026/2027 Safe Routes to School Improvement Project.

3. Proposed adoption of Resolution No. 26-65, approving the proposal from Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. for professional civil engineering, surveying, environmental coordination, grant administration support, bidding and award support, and lot line adjustment services for the Land and Water Conservation Fund Mendota Airport Park – Phase 1 Project.

4. Proposed adoption of Resolution No. 26-66, approving the proposal from Precision Civil Engineering, Inc. for professional planning, engineering coordination, publicengagement support, conceptual design coordination, phasing, and cost-planning services for preparation of the Mendota Airport Park Master Plan.

A motion was made by Mayor Pro Tem Alonso to approve Consent Calendar Items 1 through 4, seconded by Council Member Lopez; unanimously approved (4 ayes, absent:

Martinez).

BUSINESS

1. City Council discussion and consideration of a presentation regarding the Mendota Downtown Enhancement project.

Mayor Pro Tem Alonso introduced the item and City Engineer Gross presented information regarding the Mendota Downtown Enhancement project.

Discussion was held on the presentation provided by City Engineer Gross.

Mayor Pro Tem Alonso opened the public comment period.

Ofelia Ochoa commented on the item; commented on the need for a walking trail for community members; thanked the City Council for their work and wished Council Member Lopez a happy birthday.

Discussion was held on the comments shared by Ms. Ochoa.

Mayor Pro Tem Alonso closed the public comment period.

Minutes of City Council Meeting 4 September 15, 2026
Discussion was held on the item.

A motion was made by Council Member Riofrio to bring the item back to a future meeting for further discussion, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Alonso; unanimously approved (4 ayes, absent: Martinez).

PUBLIC HEARING

1. City Council discussion and consideration of holding the public hearing, waiving the second reading, and adopting Ordinance No. 26-03, amending Section 2.24.030 of Chapter 2.24 of Title 2 of the Mendota Municipal Code relating to the City's Conflict of Interest Code.

Mayor Pro Tem Alonso introduced the item and City Clerk Cabrera-Garcia provided the report.

Discussion was held on the report provided by City Clerk Cabrera-Garcia.

At 7:22 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Alonso opened the hearing to the public and seeing no one willing to comment closed it within the same minute.

A motion was made by Council Member Riofrio to waive the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 26-03, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Alonso; unanimously approved (4 ayes, absent: Martinez).

DEPARTMENT REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

1. Animal Control, Code Enforcement, and Police Department a) Update
Chief of Police Renteria provided the monthly update for the Police Department.

Discussion was held on the update provided by Chief Renteria; thanking the Police Department for their work; and the National Night Out event.

2. City Attorney
Assistant City Attorney Castro stated he will provide an update on the new Replacement Tire Efficiency Program and California Assembly Bill 2010 at a future meeting.

3. City Manager
City Manager Gonzalez provided an update on the Airport Park Project and the Community Center Project; commented on Congressman Gray’s ceremonial check presentation for the Community Center Project; wished Council Member Lopez a happy birthday; commented on the National Night Out event; thanked City Engineer Gross for his work; thanked the community for their patience during ongoing construction in the City; commented on Mendota Youth Recreation’s planned Veteran’s Day Parade; his excitement for projects in Minutes of City Council Meeting 5 September 15, 2026
the City and thanked staff for their work.

CLOSED SESSION

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS
Pursuant to Government Code sections 54954.5, subdivision (f), 54957.6 a. Agency Designated Representative: Cristian Gonzalez, City Manager b. Employee Organization: Mendota Police Officers Association At 7:34 p.m. the City Council entered Closed Session.

At 7:46 p.m. the City Council reconvened in Open Session, at which time Assistant City Attorney Castro reported that there was no reportable action on item 1.

ADJOURNMENT
With no more business to be brought before the City Council, a motion for adjournment was made at 7:46 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem Alonso, seconded by Council Member Mendoza; unanimously approved (4 ayes, absent: Martinez).
_______________________________
Jose Alonso, Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk

CITY OF MENDOTA

CASH DISBURSEMENTS
09/09/2026 - 9/24/2026
CK# 058461 - 058545, 26PP19 - 26PP20, 1007 - 1009
Check Date Check Number Check Amount Vendor Name Department Description September 11, 2026 58461 $ 329.80 ALEX AUTO DIAGNOSTICS GENERAL 2020 FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR UNIT #M88 - REPLACE SPARK PLUGS September 11, 2026 58462 $ 1,350.00 ARDENT GENERAL, INC. WATER REIMBURSEMENT DEPOSIT FOR HYDRANT METER RENTAL September 11, 2026 58463 $ 1,350.00 A S DEZIGN, INC. WATER REIMBURSEMENT DEPOSIT FOR HYDRANT METER RENTAL September 11, 2026 58464 $ 712.54 AT&T GENERAL, WATER, SEWER CITYWIDE TELEPHONE SERVICES 7/25/2026 - 8/24/2026 September 11, 2026 58465 $ 2,444.31 BADGER METER WATER (2469) ORION CELLULAR LTE SERVICE UNIT FOR AUGUST 2026 September 11, 2026 58466 $ 1,993.29 BSK ASSOCIATES WATER, SEWER

WASTEWATER WEEKLY, GENERAL EDT MONTHLY, & WEEKLY TREATMENT & DISTRIBUTION SAMPLES 7/28/2026 - 8/25/2026
September 11, 2026 58467 $ 3,397.63 CIVICPLUS, LLC GENERAL, WATER, SEWER SERVICES FOR ONLINE CODE HOSTING FOR 9/01/2026 - 8/31/2027 September 11, 2026 58468 $ 901.36 COLONIAL LIFE GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR AUGUST 2026 September 11, 2026 58469 $ 2,126.05 COMCAST GENERAL, WATER, SEWER CITYWIDE XFINITY SERVICES FOR 9/06/2026 - 10/05/2026 September 11, 2026 58470 $ 1,117.02 COMCAST BUSINESS GENERAL FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF'S MENDOTA PD CIRCUIT FOR AUGUST 2026 September 11, 2026 58471 $ 190.02 CORELOGIC INFORMATION GENERAL, WATER, SEWER REAL QUEST SERVICES FOR AUGUST 2026 September 11, 2026 58472 $ 19,117.96 FRESNO COUNTY SHERIFF GENERAL, WATER DISPATCH SERVICES AND RMS/JMS ACCESS FEE FOR SEPTEMBER 2026 September 11, 2026 58473 $ 454.00 GRID ALTERNATIVES GENERAL

BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REFUND FOR BEING A NONPROFIT

ORGANIZATION
September 11, 2026 58474 $ 363.68 MULTI SERVICE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION STREETS STREET SUPPLIES - (2) LI JUM, & (2) 15 - PIECE SCREWDRIVER SET September 11, 2026 58475 $ 695.00 iCAD INC. SEWER SERVICE WORK- REMOVE AFI PUMP #2 TO PREVENT ALARM TRIGGERING September 11, 2026 58476 $ 400.00 INSYARATH, KHAMPHOU GENERAL POLICE DEPARTMENT STATISTICS FOR AUGUST 2026 September 11, 2026 58477 $ 1,175.99 M.C REPAIRS FULL DIAGNOSTIC GENERAL PD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE FOR UNITS 87, 94 & 83 - IGNITION, ENGINE

VALVE, BRAKE PADS, OIL & FILTER SERVICES
September 11, 2026 58478 $ 1,270.66 MENDOTA 1 SMOG GENERAL, WATER, SEWER

CITY & PD VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - OIL/FILTER CHANGES, BELT, TIRES,

TRANSMISSION, CHARGING SYSTEM & DIAGNOSTICS
September 11, 2026 58479 $ 6,988.11 MID VALLEY DISPOSAL, INC REFUSE (243.54) TONS OF COMPOST FOR AUGUST 2026 September 11, 2026 58480 $ 125.00 MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL (1) POLICE DEPARTMENT COURSE FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CRISIS September 11, 2026 58481 $ 3,001.00 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL WATER (740) SODIUM HYPOCHORITE - 12.5% MILL A MEETS NSF/ANSI September 11, 2026 58482 $ 89.94 OFFICE DEPOT GENERAL, WATER, SEWER OFFICE SUPPLIES - (1) PAPER, (3) CLIPS, (1) TISSUES, & (1) BASKET September 11, 2026 58483 $ 70,110.85 PRECISION CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC GENERAL, WATER, STREETS

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - REZONING, STREET/ALLEY PROJECTS, PERMIT REVIEWS & GRANT COORDINATION 7/26/2026 - 8/25/2026 September 11, 2026 58484 $ 450.00 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE AC WATER, SEWER (2) BOOT REPLACEMENT PER MOU FOR PUBLIC WORKS September 11, 2026 58485 $ 705.03 DISTRIBUTOR OPERATIONS,INC. GENERAL POLICE DEPARTMENT VEHICLE BATTERY REPLACEMENTS - (1) MTP - 65HD, (1) ATCORE, (3) PV - 665, & (3) PV-94R/H7
September 11, 2026 58486 $ 572.09 SIGNMAX GENERAL (1) MENDOTA COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT SIGN UPDATE September 11, 2026 58487 $ 600.00 UNITED HEALTH CENTERS GENERAL, WATER, SEWER (3) PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL EXAMS FOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND

PUBLIC WORKS
September 11, 2026 58488 $ 212.38 UNIFIRST CORPORATION GENERAL, WATER, SEWER CLEANING SUPPLIES - (2) WET MOPS, (2) MOPS UNFRAMED 36" & (50)

TERRY CLOTHS
September 11, 2026 58489 $ 78.12 WECO GENERAL, WATER, SEWER RENT CYL ACETYLENE #4, OXYGEN D & OXYGEN K 7/31/2026 - 8/31/2026 September 16, 2026 58490 $ 549.50 ADT SECURITY SERVICES WATER

SECURITY & INSTALLATION SERVICES FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT FOR 9/4/2026 - 10/3/2026
September 16, 2026 58491 $ 517.28 AFLAC GENERAL AFLAC INSURANCE FOR SEPTEMBER 2026 September 16, 2026 58492 $ 614.76 JOSE ALONSO GENERAL
PER DIEM 9/23/26-9/25/26 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL

CONFERENCE IN ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA

CITY OF MENDOTA

CASH DISBURSEMENTS
09/09/2026 - 9/24/2026
CK# 058461 - 058545, 26PP19 - 26PP20, 1007 - 1009
September 16, 2026 58493 $ - VOIDED CHECK
September 16, 2026 58494 $ 892.92 AUTOZONE, INC.

GENERAL, WATER, SEWER,

STREETS
POLICE & CITY VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES: BATTERIES, COOLANT,

WASHER FLUID, WIPER BLADES, OIL, & CAR WASH SOAP
September 16, 2026 58495 $ 1,654.32 BELMONT NURSERY GENERAL, STREETS PARKS & STREET SUPPLIES - (66) COLOR BEDDING, (2) TECOMA STANS BELLS OF FIRE, & (1) PISTACIA C. KEITH DAVEY 36 BOXES
September 16, 2026 58496 $ 2,705.65

DNFINC,DBA BOBCAT OF FRESNO,

BOBCAT WATER, SEWER, STREETS
WATER, SEWER, STREET SUPPLIES - (2) TRACKS E32, (2) SCREW BLEEDER, & (2) PRESSURE ZERK
September 16, 2026 58497 $ 364.94 CINTAS CORPORATION NO. 2 GENERAL, WATER, SEWER

FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY HALL, PUBLIC

WORKS, WATER TREATMENT PLANT, WASTEWATER TREATMENT
September 16, 2026 58498 $ 3,108.97 EINERSON'S PREPRESS GENERAL, WATER, SEWER OFFICE SUPPLIES - (12,000) LEFT - HAND WINDOW ENVELOPES & UTILITY BILLS
September 16, 2026 58499 $ 215.00 GONZALEZ, CRISTIAN GENERAL, WATER, SEWER PER DIEM 9/23/2026 - 9/25/2026 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL

CONFERENCE IN ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
September 16, 2026 58500 $ 8,025.51 MODESTO INDUSTRIAL ELECTRICAL SEWER WASTEWATER PUMP #1 SERVICE FOR PARTS & LABOR September 16, 2026 58501 $ 677.76 JESUS MENDOZA GENERAL PERDIEM 9/22/2026 - 9/25/2026 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL

CONFERENCE IN ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
September 16, 2026 58502 $ 320.00 MINERAL KING PUBLISHING, INC. GENERAL PUBLIC NOTICE - AMENDING ORDINANCE 26-03 CITY OF MENDOTA September 16, 2026 58503 $ 146.93 PITNEY BOWES INC. GENERAL, WATER, SEWER

POSTAGE METER RENTAL/SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR JANUARY -
SEPTEMBER 2026
September 16, 2026 58504 $ 42,205.18 PROVOST & PRITCHARD GENERAL, STREETS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, STREET
RECONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AUGUST 2026
September 16, 2026 58505 $ 3,044.75 PURCHASE POWER GENERAL, WATER, SEWER POSTAGE METER REFILLS FOR 8/24/2026 - 8/25/2026 & 9/9/2026 - 9/10/2026 September 16, 2026 58506 $ 1,995.93 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC GENERAL PARK SUPPLIES - (50) HUNTER NOZZLES, (12) 5" RISERS & (12) 6" RISERS September 16, 2026 58507 $ 2,503.64 SORENSEN MACHINE WORKS

GENERAL, WATER, SEWER,
STREETS AUGUST 2026 CITYWIDE DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES
September 16, 2026 58508 $ 108.52 SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. GENERAL PARK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE - (1) 27" AERATOR, MAKE: RYAN, & MODEL:

LAWNAIRE V GAS
September 16, 2026 58509 $ 535.00 TECH MASTER PEST MANAGEMENT GENERAL, WATER, SEWER

PEST CONTROL SERVICES CITY HALL/DMV/YOUTH CENTER, WATER

DIVISION BLDS, PUBLIC WORKS, POLICE DEPARTMENT
September 16, 2026 58510 $ 851.65 VALLEY IRON INC. GENERAL PARK SUPPLIES FOR NEW JESSE A GILL PARK SIGN - (1) SQ. TUBE, (2) 3/4 HR ANGLE & (2) 1X1 HR ANGLE
September 16, 2026 58511 $ 215.00 VALDEZ, NORA GENERAL
PER DIEM 9/23/2026 - 9/25/2026 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL

CONFERENCE IN ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
September 18, 2026 58512 $ 220.17 ADT SECURITY SERVICES GENERAL SECURITY SERVICES FOR ROJAS PIERCE CONCESSION STAND 10/1/2026 - 12/31/2026
September 18, 2026 58513 $ 2,992.25 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES, INC

GENERAL, WATER, SEWER,

REFUSE, STREETS
SEPTEMBER 2026 - NNO, MCC, SB1383, CHP GRANT, POLICE DEPARTMENT & CITY HALL OFFICE SUPPLIES
September 18, 2026 58514 $ 20,497.69 ANDERSON PUMP COMPANY WATER SERVICE WORK FOR FORDELL AG WELL #4 INSTALLATION OF NEW PUMP & MOTOR
September 18, 2026 58515 $ 10,653.35

EMPLOYER DRIVEN INSURANCE SERVICE
INC GENERAL BILLING SUMMARY FOR OCTOBER 2026 AND CLAIMS FOR AUGUST 2026 September 18, 2026 58516 $ 80.17 ELECTRIC DRIVES INC GENERAL PARKS SUPPLIES - (8) BUSSMANN 30-AMP 600V FAST- ACTING September 18, 2026 58517 $ 1,070.00 FASTECH STREETS (1) PLC SWITCHOVER MONTHLY PM SERVICE FOR SEPTEMBER 2026 September 18, 2026 58518 $ 12,779.49 GRAINGER INC. REFUSE CALRECYCLE GRANT PROJECT - PURCHASE OF (2) IN WALL

REFRIGERATED BOTTLE FILLING STATIONS
September 18, 2026 58519 $ 1,547.55 VERIZON WIRELESS GENERAL, WATER, SEWER CITYWIDE CELL PHONE SERVICES 8/7/2026 - 9/06/2026 September 24, 2026 58520 $ 16.35 ACE TROPHY SHOP GENERAL, WATER, SEWER (1) NAMEPLATE - SANDOVAL FOR COUNCIL MEETINGS September 24, 2026 58521 $ 90.76 ADT SECURITY SERVICES WATER WATER TREATMENT PLANT SECURITY SERVICE, 10/04/2026 - 11/03/2026 September 24, 2026 58522 $ 324.64 ALERT-0-LITE GENERAL, WATER, SEWER DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES - (10) BLACK BELT SUPPORTS, (2) EYE SNAPS, & (5) ORANGE VESTS
September 24, 2026 58523 $ 1,939.25 AT&T MOBILITY GENERAL POLICE DEPARTMENT PHONE SERVICE, 8/12/2026 - 9/11/2026 September 24, 2026 58524 $ 311.34 CHEMSEARCH SEWER (1) SERVICE CHARGE - DRAIN MAINTENANCE FOR LIFT STATION September 24, 2026 58525 $ 1,172.23 CORBIN WILLITS SY'S INC. GENERAL, WATER, SEWER ENHANCEMENT AND SERVICE FEE FOR OCTOBER 2026

CITY OF MENDOTA

CASH DISBURSEMENTS
09/09/2026 - 9/24/2026
CK# 058461 - 058545, 26PP19 - 26PP20, 1007 - 1009
September 24, 2026 58526 $ 210.00 DATA TICKET, INC. GENERAL DAILY CITATION PROCESSING & NOTICES FOR AUGUST 2026 September 24, 2026 58527 $ 2,949.93 DELTA SAND, GRAVEL & RECYCLING, INC GENERAL PARKS - DUST CONTROL TREATMENT FOR 7,777 SQUARE YARDS USING

21.25 TONS
September 24, 2026 58528 $ 932.52 GONZALEZ TOWING & TRANSPORT WATER, SEWER WATER AND SEWER - (4) NEW MILESTAR LT245/75R17 TIRES, INCLUDING

TIRE FEES AND INSTALLATION LABOR
September 24, 2026 58529 $ 108.34

MULTI SERVICE TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTION, INC SEWER SEWER SUPPLY - (1) HANDHELD CORDED DRAIN CLEANER September 24, 2026 58530 $ 108.08 HR DIRECT GENERAL
ENGLISH PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL POSTER GUARD, 1-YEAR PUBLIC

SECTOR, FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
September 24, 2026 58531 $ 7,585.36 HUMANA INSURANCE COMPANY GENERAL DENTAL, VISION, & LIFE INSURANCE FOR OCTOBER 2026 September 24, 2026 58532 $ 306.49 LEAF GENERAL, WATER, SEWER (2) KYOCERA COPIER SYSTEMS FOR SEPTEMBER 2026 September 24, 2026 58533 $ 1,205.00 M.C REPAIRS FULL DIAGNOSTIC GENERAL 2020 FORD UNIT #80 - REMOVE & REPLACE REAR AXLE ASSEMBLY September 24, 2026 58534 $ 438.73 MENDOTA 1 SMOG STREETS SMOG INSPECTIONS 2006 FORD ECONOLINE E-350 & 2016 FORD F-350;

SHIFT-INTERLOCK REPLACEMENT
September 24, 2026 58535 $ 2,338.98 MID VALLEY DISPOSAL, INC REFUSE, STREETS PUBLIC WORKS REFUSE SERVICES, SEPTEMBER 1-15, 2026 September 24, 2026 58536 $ 3,039.71 NORTHSTAR CHEMICAL WATER (750) SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE, 12.5% MILL A, MEETS NSF/ANSI

STANDARDS
September 24, 2026 58537 $ 322.10 OFFICE DEPOT GENERAL, WATER, SEWER OFFICE SUPPLIES - (15) DESK PADS, (4) ERASABLE ITEMS, (5) BOXES OF PAPER, & (1) PACK OF POST-IT NOTES
September 24, 2026 58538 $ 85,669.89 PG&E

GENERAL, WATER, SEWER,

STREETS
CITYWIDE UTILITIES FOR 8/06/2026 - 9/03/2026 & WATER DEPARTMENT UTILITIES FOR 7/31/2026 - 9/09/2026
September 24, 2026 58539 $ 10,038.75 PRECISION CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR CA-33 & LOZANO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT & MSR, 7/26/2026 - 8/25/2026
September 24, 2026 58540 $ 50,133.57 PROVOST & PRITCHARD

GENERAL, WATER, SEWER,

STREETS

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - ROUNDABOUT, WATER, SEWER,
STORMWATER, & DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR AUGUST 2026
September 24, 2026 58541 $ 1,961.51 SIGNMAX GENERAL, STREETS PARK AND STREET SIGNS - (1) DOUBLE-SIDED JESSE A. GILL PARK SIGN, (5) STOP SIGNS, & (2) ROUNDABOUT DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
September 24, 2026 58542 $ 1,186.26 HOME DEPOT GENERAL, STREETS HOME DEPOT PURCHASES, 8/26/2026 - 9/03/2026: (35) PORTLAND TYPE I-II,

KEYCHAIN MEASURING TAPE, KNEE PADS, & HAND PUMP
September 24, 2026 58543 $ 120.00 TOP DOG TRAINING CENTER GENERAL K-9 MAINTENANCE TRAINING FOR OFFICER LOPEZ & YANOSCH, 9/19/2026 September 24, 2026 58544 $ 1,025,574.25

WALSH MONTGOMERY CONSTRUCTION,
INC STREETS 2024 LOCAL STREETS RECONSTRUCTION, 8/01/2026 - 8/28/2026 September 24, 2026 58545 $ 36,005.71 WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC ATTORNEY GENERAL, WATER, SEWER

LEGAL SERVICES - GENERAL & SPECIAL, AGREEMENT, WARRANT
APPLICATION, ABATEMENT, & MOTION, JULY - AUGUST 2026
September 9, 2026 26PP19 $ 202,781.00 CITY OF MENDOTA PAYROLL GENERAL PAYROLL TRANSFER 8/24/2026 - 9/06/2026 September 23, 2026 26PP20 $ 226,960.00 CITY OF MENDOTA PAYROLL GENERAL PAYROLL TRANSFER 9/07/2026 - 9/20/2026 September 11, 2026 1007 $ 3,865.00 BSK ASSOCIATES GENERAL

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR INSPECTION & MATERIAL TESTING FOR NEW COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT MAY 2026
September 11, 2026 1008 $ 592,542.98 MARKO CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC GENERAL NEW COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT NO. 5362 FOR AUGUST 2026 September 11, 2026 1009 $ 1,657.50 PRECISION CIVIL ENGINEERING, INC GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MENDOTA COMMUNITY CENTER 7/26/2026 - 8/25/2026
$ 2,505,311.94
1 AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: ANNEMARIE FOX, PROJECT ENGINEER
VIA: CRISTIAN GONZALEZ, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AWARDING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE 5TH & QUINCE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT TO DAVE CHRISTIAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $663,797.00
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2026
ISSUE
Shall the City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-68, awarding the construction contract for the 5th & Quince Street Reconstruction Project to Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $663,797.00?

BACKGROUND
5th Street is functionally classified as a collector and is eligible to receive federal aid dollars. The City of Mendota (“City”) applied for and was awarded Surface Transportation Block Grant (“STBG”) funds in 2022 through Fresno Council of Governments’ (“FCOG’s”) competitive call for projects to reconstruct 5th Street from Divisadero to Quince Street. The City & Project Engineer and staff worked with Caltrans and FCOG to accelerate the programming of the funds.

Quince Street is functionally classified as a local road and will be funded with local funds. To keep funding separate, the project was split into schedule A and schedule B. 5th street reconstruction is Schedule A and Quince Street reconstruction Schedule B. The City has completed right of way clearance, environmental review (CEQA & NEPA) and construction documents. On July 31, 2026, Caltrans gave the City authorization for construction funding.

The request for bids was initially advertised in the Business Journal and construction documents (plans and specifications) were made available to contractors through local Builder’s Exchanges on Friday, September 4, 2026 and advertised again on Friday, September 11, 2026. On Friday, September 25, 2026 at 3:00 p.m. the public bid opening was held at City Hall. Eight (8) general contractors attended and submitted bids, along with staff and the Project Engineer. The bids were as follows:

CONTRACTOR BASE BID AMOUNT
Juarez Brothers $823,278.03
Cal Valley Construction $993,305.00
Avison Construction $950,648.00
Central Valley Asphalt $717,400.00
JT2, Inc dba Todd Companies $857,000.00
Asphalt Design $814,825.00
Dave Christian Construction $663,797.00
AJ Excavation $868,524.00
2 ANALYSIS
The Project Engineer has reviewed the submitted bid packages. The apparent lowest bidder, Dave Christian Construction Co. Inc. and their bid package was reviewed and found to be complete and responsive. Dave Christian Construction Co. Inc. has a good reputation for street projects and is a licensed Class A contractor.

The Engineer’s Estimate for the project was $1.1 million, so this bid received present good value to the City.

We will work with the contractor for scheduling, but work is anticipated to start in November and be completed in December.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City has been awarded and authorized to utilize $ 797,754 in federal STBG funding.

Schedule A (5th Street) Base bid is $534,222 and Schedule B (Quince Street) base bid is $129,575.

The lowest responsive and responsible bid price is significantly lower than the Engineer’s Estimate and fits within the budget. The City will submit for and receive reimbursement for

88.53% of Schedule A of the project costs (approximately $472,946). We are working with Caltrans to determine what can be done with the balance of STBG funds. Additional expenses to the City will be for Construction Engineering (Administration, Management and Testing services). City (“local”) expenses will be paid for out of the City’s Enterprise Street Fund (Gas Tax, LTF, Measure C) and were budgeted for in the adopted FY 2026-2027 Annual Budget. This project will not impact the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolution 26-68, awarding the construction contract for the 5th & Quince Street Reconstruction Project to Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $663,797.00, and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all documents necessary for the completion of the Project.

Attachment:

1. Resolution No. 26-68
1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE

CITY OF MENDOTA, COUNTY OF FRESNO
RESOLUTION NO. 26-68

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA AWARDING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE 5TH & QUINCE STREET
RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT TO DAVE CHRISTIAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

IN THE AMOUNT OF $663,797.00
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota (“City”) owns and maintains the public street right of way of 5th Street and Quince Street; and
WHEREAS¸ in 2022, the City was awarded $797,754.00 in Federal Surface Transportation Block Grant (“STBG”) by Fresno Council of Governments during their regional competitive bid for the reconstruction of 5th & Quince Street (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, 5th Street from Divisadero Street to Quince Street (Project limits) is functionally classified as a collector and eligible to receive federal funding; and WHEREAS, all right of way and environmental (CEQA & NEPA) clearances have been obtained for this Project; and
WHEREAS, on July 31, 2026, the City received authorization for the STBG funding for Project construction from Caltrans; and
WHEREAS, on September 4, 2026, and September 11, 2026, notice was published in the Business Journal and regional Builder’s Exchanges, notifying all interested parties to submit bids for the Project; and
WHEREAS, a public bid opening was held promptly after the deadline published in the notices on Friday, September 25, 2026, at 3:00 p.m. at City Hall; and WHEREAS, eight (8) companies submitted bids before the deadline; and WHEREAS, the apparent lowest responsible bidder was Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc., and its proposal was found to be responsive and within the overall Project budget; and
WHEREAS¸ the City budgeted for local Project costs in the adopted Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Annual Budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mendota hereby awards the construction contract for the 5th & Quince Street Reconstruction, Federal Project No. STPL-5285(027), to Dave Christian Construction 2 Co., Inc., in the amount of $663,797.00 and authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all documents necessary for the completion of the Project. ______________________________
Victor Martinez, Mayor
ATTEST:

I, Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk of the City of Mendota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted and passed by the City Council at a regular meeting of said Council, held at the Mendota City Council Chambers located at 725 Riofrio Street, Mendota, California 93640, on the 6th day of October 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk
1 AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: REBEKAH BONGLO, PROJECT ENGINEER
VIA: CRISTIAN GONZALEZ, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: AWARDING THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE AMADOR & SMOOT EXTENSION PROJECT TO DAVE CHRISTIAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $666,630.00
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2026
ISSUE
Shall the City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-69, awarding the construction contract for the Amador & Smoot Extension Project to Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $666,630.00?

BACKGROUND
Smoot Avenue and Amador Avenue are functionally classified as a collector and is eligible to receive federal aid dollars. The City of Mendota (“City”) applied for and was awarded Surface Transportation Block Grant (“STBG”) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (“CMAQ”) funds in 2022 through Fresno Council of Governments’ (“FCOG’s”) competitive call for projects to extend Amador Avenue & Smoot Avenue starting approximately 150’ south of Oxnard Street and ending at Gregg Court. The City Engineer and staff worked with Caltrans and FCOG for the programming of the funds. The City has completed right of way clearance, environmental review (CEQA & NEPA) and construction documents. On July 30, 2026, Caltrans gave the City authorization for construction funding.

The request for bids was initially advertised in the Business Journal and construction documents (plans and specifications) were made available to contractors through local Builder’s Exchanges on Friday, September 04, 2026 and advertised again on Friday, September 11, 2026. On Friday, September 25, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. the public bid opening was held at City Hall. Eight (8) general contractors attended and submitted bids, along with staff and the Project Engineer. The bids were as follows:

CONTRACTOR BASE BID AMOUNT
Cal Valley Construction $987,591.00
AJ Excavation, Inc $794,952.00
Avison Construction $899,892.00
Harris Development Corp dba HBC Enterprises $1,054,344.00 Dave Christian Construction $666,630.00
Juarez Brothers $793,284.67
JT2 dba Todd Companies $805,700.00
Asphalt Design by Juan Gomez $802,000.00
2 ANALYSIS
The Project Engineer has reviewed the submitted bid packages. The apparent lowest bidder, Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. and their bid package was reviewed and found to be complete and responsive. Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. has a good reputation for street projects and is a licensed Class A contractor.

The Engineer’s Estimate for the project was $1.03 million, so this bid received presents good value to the City.

We will work with the contractor for scheduling, but work is anticipated to start in October and be completed in November.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City has been awarded and authorized to utilize $900,041 in federal STBG and CMAQ funding. The lowest responsive and responsible bid price is significantly lower than the Engineer’s Estimate and fits within the budget. The City will submit for and receive reimbursement for all the project costs (approximately $666,630). We are working with Caltrans to determine what can be done with the balance of STBG & CMAQ funds. Additional expenses to the City will be for Construction Engineering (Administration, Management and Testing services). City (“Local”) expenses will be paid for out of the City’s Enterprise Street Fund (Gas Tax, LTF, Measure C) and were budgeted for in the adopted Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Annual Budget. This project will not impact the General Fund.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolution 26-69, awarding the construction contract for the Amador & Smoot Extension Project to Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. in the amount of $666,630.00, and authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all documents necessary for the completion of the Project.

Attachment:

1. Resolution No. 26-69
1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE

CITY OF MENDOTA, COUNTY OF FRESNO
RESOLUTION NO. 26-69

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA AWARDING

THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR THE AMADOR & SMOOT EXTENSION PROJECT TO DAVE CHRISTIAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $666,630.00
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota (“City”) owns and maintains the public street right of way of Amador Avenue and Smoot Avenue; and
WHEREAS¸ in 2022, the City was awarded $900,041 in Federal Funds via Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (“CMAQ”) and Surface Transportation Block Grant (“STBG”) by Fresno Council of Governments during their regional completive bid for the extension of Amador Avenue and Smoot Avenue Project (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, Amador Avenue and Smoot Avenue (Project limits) are functionally classified as a collector and eligible to receive federal funding; and WHEREAS, all right of way and environmental (CEQA & NEPA) clearances have been obtained for the Project; and
WHEREAS, on July 30, 2026, the City received authorization for the STBG and CMAQ funding for Project construction from Caltrans; and WHEREAS, on September 4, 2026, and September 11, 2026, notice was published in the Business Journal and regional Builder’s Exchanges, notifying all interested parties to submit bids for the Project; and
WHEREAS, a public bid opening was held promptly after the deadline published in the notices on Friday, September 25, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. at City Hall; and WHEREAS, eight (8) companies submitted bids before the deadline; and WHEREAS, the apparent lowest responsible bidder was Dave Christian Construction Co., Inc. and its proposal was found to be responsive and within the overall Project budget; and
WHEREAS¸ the City budgeted for local Project costs in the adopted Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Annual Budget.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mendota hereby awards the construction contract for the Amador & Smoot Extension Project, Federal Project No. CMLSTPL-5285(026), to Dave Christian Construction Co., 2 Inc., in the amount of $666,630.00, and authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to execute all documents necessary for the completion of the Project. ______________________________
Victor Martinez, Mayor
ATTEST:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk
1 AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: ERIC ANTUNA, POLICE LIEUTENANT
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND UPFITTING OF ONE (1) CHEVROLET SILVERADO HEAVY DUTY 2500 TRUCK FROM WINNER CHEVROLET, INC. THROUGH CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES STATEWIDE CONTRACT NO. 1-22-23-20D, WITH UPFITTING BY COOK’S COMMUNICATIONS, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $116,634.00, FOR USE IN SUPPORT OF THE MENDOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT’S DUI

COMMAND POST
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2026
ISSUE
Shall the City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-70, authorizing the purchase of one (1) Chevrolet Silverado Heavy Duty 2500 truck from Winner Chevrolet, Inc. through California Department of General Services Statewide Contract No. 1-22-23-20D, with upfitting by Cook’s Communications, in an amount not to exceed $116,634.00, for use in support of the Mendota Police Department’s DUI Command Post?

BACKGROUND
On July 21, 2026, the City Council authorized the City of Mendota (“City”) to enter into an agreement with the California Highway Patrol through the Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (“CTFGP”). The grant includes funding for the purchase of a heavy-duty patrol truck.

The Police Department operates a DUI Command Post and needs a heavy-duty truck to safely tow the Command Post and transport related equipment and supplies. The Chevrolet Silverado HD 2500 meets the Department’s operational needs.

ANALYSIS
The California Department of General Services (“DGS”) offers statewide contracts that allow local government agencies to purchase vehicles using pricing and terms established through the State’s competitive purchasing process.

Staff proposes purchasing the truck from Winner Chevrolet, Inc. through DGS Statewide Contract No. 1-22-23-20D.

Mendota Municipal Code section 2.48.110, subdivision (C), allows the City to utilize a state, county, or other city bid package instead of conducting its own bid process.

Winner Chevrolet, Inc. provided a quote of $79,995.31 for the purchase of the truck.

Mendota Municipal Code section 2.48.090, subdivision (E), provides for purchases to be made without competitive bidding “[i]f the purchasing agent determines that limitations on the source 2 of supply, necessary restrictions in specifications, necessary standardization, quality considerations or other valid reasons for proceeding without competitive bidding are present ….” Upfitting of this truck must be carried out by Cook’s Communications because it is the only company that can program the Mendota Police Department’s radio frequencies. Cook’s Communications provided a quote for this upfitting work in the amount of $36,638.69.

The total amount of this truck purchase and upfitting is $116,634.00.

FISCAL IMPACT
The total cost of the truck and upfitting is $116,634.00. The City’s General Fund will initially fund the purchase and will be reimbursed through the Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-70, authorizing the purchase of one (1) Chevrolet Silverado Heavy Duty 2500 truck from Winner Chevrolet, Inc. through California Department of General Services Statewide Contract No. 1-22-23-20D, with upfitting by Cook’s Communications, in an amount not to exceed $116,634.00, for use in support of the Mendota Police Department’s DUI Command Post.

Attachments:

1. Resolution No. 26-70

2. Exhibit “A” – Quote from Winner Chevrolet

3. Exhibit “B” – Quote from Cook’s Communications
1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE

CITY OF MENDOTA, COUNTY OF FRESNO
RESOLUTION NO. 26-70

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE (1) CHEVROLET SILVERADO HEAVY DUTY 2500 TRUCK FROM WINNER CHEVROLET, INC. THROUGH CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES STATEWIDE CONTRACT NO. 1-22-23- 20D, WITH UPFITTING BY COOK’S COMMUNICATIONS, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $116,634.00, FOR USE IN SUPPORT OF THE MENDOTA POLICE DEPARTMENT’S DUI COMMAND POST
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota (“City”) entered into an agreement with the California Highway Patrol’s, Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (“CTFGP”) by way of resolution during a City Council Meeting on July 21, 2026, setting up necessary procedures governing the application and procurement of one (1) new 2027 Chevrolet Silverado Heavy Duty (“HD”) 2500 patrol truck; and
WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Highway Patrol require the City to purchase the patrol truck; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Police Department operates and utilizes a DUI Command Post to support DUI enforcement operations, public safety activities and law enforcement functions; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Police Department requires a capable heavy-duty patrol truck to safely and reliably tow the DUI Command Post and transport associated equipment and supplies; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Police Department has determined that a Chevrolet Silverado HD 2500 patrol truck is appropriate for this purpose based on its towing capacity, payload capability, durability, and suitability for the Department’s operational needs; and
WHEREAS, the California Department of General Services (“DGS”), Procurement Division, establishes statewide contracts for the purchase of fleet vehicles and other goods and services through competitively awarded procurement agreements, and the State of California has already completed the competitive purchasing process and has established contract terms with qualified vendors; and WHEREAS, DGS identifies Statewide Contract No. 1-22-23-20D as a statewide contract for Fleet Vehicles – Trucks, with Winner Chevrolet identified as the contractor; and
2 WHEREAS, Mendota Municipal Code (“MMC”) section 2.48.110, subdivision (C), provides that, in lieu of publishing and receiving its own bids, the City’s purchasing agent may elect to utilize bids under a state, county, or other city bid package; and WHEREAS, pursuant to MMC section 2.48.110, subdivision (C), the City desires to utilize California Department of General Services Statewide Contract No. 1-22-23- 20D for the purchase of the Chevrolet Silverado HD 2500 patrol truck from Winner Chevrolet, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, DGS statewide contracts provide eligible governmental agencies with the ability to purchase specified vehicles through established contract terms and pricing; and
WHEREAS, Winner Chevrolet, Inc., provided a quote of $79,995.31 for the City’s proposed purchase of this truck; and
WHEREAS, MMC section 2.48.090, subdivision (E), provides for purchases to be made without competitive bidding “[i]f the purchasing agent determines that limitations on the source of supply, necessary restrictions in specifications, necessary standardization, quality considerations or other valid reasons for proceeding without competitive bidding are present ….”; and
WHEREAS, after purchase, this truck must be upfitted to meet the Mendota Police Department’s and the State’s required standards; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Police Department’s services operate on radio frequencies that can only be programmed by Cook’s Communications; and WHEREAS, the Mendota Police Department obtained a quote for the truck’s upfitting from Cook’s Communications in the amount of $36,638.69; and WHEREAS, the total price for the purchase and upfitting of the truck is $116,634.00; and
WHEREAS, the initial funding for the purchase of the HD patrol truck will be provided by the City’s General Fund, which will be reimbursed once the City receives the reimbursement from the CTFGP.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Mendota hereby:

1. Approves the quote submitted by Winner Chevrolet, Inc., attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” to purchase the truck in the amount of $79,995.31.

2. Approves the quote submitted by Cook’s Communications, attached hereto as Exhibit “B,” to upfit the truck in the amount of $36,638.69. 3 3. Authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to execute such additional documents as may be necessary to purchase the truck.

4. Certifies that the City has reviewed, understands, and agrees to the General Provisions contained in the CTFGP regulations.

5. Delegates authority to the City Manager, or their designee, to conduct all negotiations, sign, and submit all documents, including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, and payment requests, which may be necessary for the completion of the Grant Scope of the CTFGP.

6. Agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, and guidelines.
______________________________
Victor Martinez, Mayor
ATTEST:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk

EXHIBIT A
Winner Chevrolet DATE September 25, 2026
TO: Eric Antuna Quotation # 22783
Mendota PD FAN # 977703
775-450-9209 Mobile 1759 7th St
Mendota, CA 93640
Prepared by: Jerry Powers
(559) 960-9430
Comments or special instructions: Vehicle build and options are in additional pages.

AMOUNT
$ 49,536.00
$ 1,480.00
$ 22,130.00
$ 73,146.00
DOC Fee $ 85.00
Taxable Subtotal: $ 73,231.00

9.225% $ 6,755.56
Tire Fee: $8.75
Fuel
Total: 79,995.31 $
QTY 1 Grand Total $ 79,995.31
7220 Fawn Way,
Sacramento, CA 95823
State Contract # 1-22-23-20D
****Shipping charge added for deliveries beyond Sacramento. No charge for will call.**** CA Tire Fee: $1.75 / Per Tire
Tax Rate(Subject to change):

Description
Upgrade to 2027 ZR2 Trim
(Order Acknowledgment Signature) (Date)
If you have any questions concerning this quotation, contact Jerry Powers at 775-450-9209 or email at [email protected]
Line 37 Silverado
Options (Refer to Window Sticker):

Delivery Charge:
**** specs with the PO or the vehicle will not be ordered. **** Subtotal
**** Please review, sign, and return a copy of the quote and **** Vehicle qualifies for a $500 prompt payment discount if paid within 20 days of receiving. ___________________________________________________
THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS!
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

This document contains information considered Confidential between GM and its Clients uniquely. The information provided is not intended for public disclosure. Prices, specifications, and availability are subject to change without notice, and do not include certain fees, taxes and charges that may be required by law or vary by manufacturer or region.

Performance figures are guidelines only, and actual performance may vary. Photos may not represent actual vehicles or exact configurations. Content based on report preparer’s input is subject to the accuracy of the input provided.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 2
Table of Contents
• Dealership Information
• Window Sticker
• Selected Model and Options
• Standard Equipment
• Technical Specifications
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 3
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Dealership Information
***PLEASE REVIEW THE "WINDOW STICKER," QUOTE, AND ALL INCLUDED INFORMATION AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACCURACY. IF A PURCHASE ORDER IS ISSUED, PLEASE INCLUDE A SIGNED COPY OF THIS QUOTE WITH THE "WINDOW STICKER." BY THIS QUOTE

BEING SIGNED AND RETURNED BY THE PURCHASING AGENCY, THE PURCHASING

AGENCY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE VEHICLE CONFIGURATION AND PRICE ARE ACCURATE.******TAX IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE QUOTE PRICE. PURCHASING AGENCY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CALCULATING TAX. THE TAX RATE IS BASED ON THE REGISTRATION ADDRESS AND CANNOT BE A PO BOX. ******IF THE VEHICLE IS GOING TO BE DELIVERED BEYOND F.O.B. SACRAMENTO, ADDITIONAL COST WILL BE REQUIRED. *** Prepared By:

Jerry Powers
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
916-426-5752
[email protected]
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 4
Window Sticker

SUMMARY
[Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 MSRP:$72,800.00 Interior:Jet Black/Graystone, Perforated leather seat trim Exterior 1:Black
Exterior 2:No color has been selected.

Engine, 6.6L V8
Transmission, 10-Speed automatic

OPTIONS

CODE MODEL MSRP
CK20743 [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2
$72,800.00

OPTIONS
3LT ZR2 Preferred Equipment Group $0.00
9L7 Upfitter switch kit, (5) $150.00
A50 Seats, front bucket $0.00
CKF GVWR, 11,025 lbs. (5001 kg) $0.00
GBA Black $0.00
GT4 Rear axle, 3.73 ratio $0.00
H37 Jet Black/Graystone, Perforated leather seat trim $0.00 IOK Audio system, Chevrolet Infotainment 3 Premium system $0.00 K4Z Battery, auxiliary, 700 cold-cranking amps/70 Amp-hr $135.00 KGU Universal Vehicle Module $295.00
KW5 Alternator, 220 amps $150.00
L8T Engine, 6.6L V8 $0.00
MKM Transmission, 10-Speed automatic $0.00
RB9 Wheels, 18" (45.7 cm) Gloss Black $0.00
RVS LPO, Assist steps - 4" Black - round $750.00
VK3 License plate kit, front $0.00
YF5 Emissions, California state requirements $0.00
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 5
SUBTOTAL $74,280.00
Adjustments Total $0.00
Destination Charge $2,595.00
TOTAL PRICE $76,875.00

FUEL ECONOMY
Est City:N/A
Est Highway:N/A
Est Highway Cruising Range:N/A
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 6
Selected Model and Options
MODEL

CODE MODEL MSRP
CK20743 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 $72,800.00 COLORS

CODE DESCRIPTION
GBA Black

EMISSIONS

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
YF5 Emissions, California state requirements 0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00 ENGINE

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
L8T Engine, 6.6L V8 with Direct Injection and Variable Valve Timing, gasoline, (401 hp [299 kW] @ 5200 rpm, 464 lb-ft of torque [629 Nm] @ 4000 rpm) (STD)

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00

TRANSMISSION

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
MKM Transmission, 10-Speed automatic (STD) (Standard with (L8T)

6.6L V8 gas engine.)

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00
GVWR

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
CKF GVWR, 11,025 lbs. (5001 kg) (STD) 0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00 AXLE

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
GT4 Rear axle, 3.73 ratio (Requires (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine. Not available with (L5P) Duramax 6.6L Turbo-Diesel V8 engine.)

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 7

PREFERRED EQUIPMENT GROUP

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
3LT ZR2 Preferred Equipment Group includes standard equipment 0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00 WHEELS

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
RB9 Wheels, 18" (45.7 cm) Gloss Black with Etched ZR2 logo (STD) 0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00 PAINT

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
GBA Black 0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00

SEAT TYPE

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
A50 Seats, front bucket with center console, for Crew Cab and Double Cab models (STD)

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00

SEAT TRIM

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
H37 Jet Black/Graystone, Perforated leather seat trim 0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00 RADIO

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
IOK Audio system, Chevrolet Infotainment 3 Premium system with Google built-in compatibility (select service plan required, terms and limitations apply) including navigation capability, 13.4" diagonal HD color touchscreen, includes multi-touch display, AM/FM stereo, Bluetooth streaming audio for music and most phones; featuring Wireless Apple CarPlay and Wireless Android Auto capability for compatible phones, advanced voice recognition, in-vehicle apps, personalized profiles for infotainment and vehicle settings (STD)

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 8

ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT - MECHANICAL

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
K4Z Battery, auxiliary, 700 cold-cranking amps/70 Amp-hr (Requires (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine and either (KW5) 220-amp alternator or (KHF) dual alternators. Not available with (KW7) 170-amp alternator.)

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $135.00
KW5 Alternator, 220 amps (Included with (L5P) Duramax 6.6L TurboDiesel V8 engine or (VYU) Snow Plow Prep/Camper Package.

Free flow on (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine.)

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $150.00

ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT - EXTERIOR

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
VK3 License plate kit, front (will be shipped to orders with ship-to states that require front license plate)

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $0.00

ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT - INTERIOR

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
9L7 Upfitter switch kit, (5) Provides 3-30 amp and 2-20 amp configurable circuits to facilitate installation of aftermarket electrical accessories. Kit with all required parts will be shipped loose with the truck for installation by the dealer or upfitter at customer expense. Installation instructions and technical assistance available at www.gmupfitter.com.

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $150.00
KGU Universal Vehicle Module Includes module, customer interface harness and instructions. Provides vehicle data over an open CAN network (J1939). 10 switchable inputs/outputs and Custom Configuration Tool to integrate upfit equipment controls. Software features that support Auto Vehicle Start, Shutdown Inhibit, Fast Idle and Snow Plow.

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $295.00

ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT - LPO

CODE DESCRIPTION FRONT
WEIGHT
REAR
WEIGHT
MSRP
RVS LPO, Assist steps - 4" Black - round (dealer-installed) (Not available with any other assist steps.)

0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $750.00
Options Total 0.00 lbs 0.00 lbs $1,480.00
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 9
Standard Equipment
Package
Technology Package includes (DRZ) Rear Camera Mirror and (UV6) Multicolor 15" Diagonal Head-Up Display (Includes (KSG) Adaptive Cruise Control.)
Trailering Package includes trailer hitch, 7-pin connector and (CTT) Hitch Guidance Mechanical
Durabed, pickup bed
Engine, 6.6L V8 with Direct Injection and Variable Valve Timing, gasoline, (401 hp [299 kW] @ 5200 rpm, 464 lb -ft of torque [629 N-m] @ 4000 rpm) (STD)
Transmission, 10-Speed automatic (STD) (Standard with (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine.) Rear axle, 3.73 ratio (Requires (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine. Not available with (L5P) Duramax 6.6L Turbo-Diesel V8 engine.)
GVWR, 11,025 lbs. (5001 kg) (STD)
Push Button Start
Air filter, heavy-duty
Air filtration monitoring
Hill Descent Control
Transfer case, two-speed active electronic Autotrac with push button control Rear electronic locking differential
Four wheel drive
Cooling, external engine oil cooler
Cooling, auxiliary external transmission oil cooler
Battery, heavy-duty 720 cold-cranking amps/80 Amp-hr maintenance-free with rundown protection and retained accessory power (Included and only available with (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine.) Alternator, 170 amps (Requires (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine.) Trailer brake controller, integrated
Skid Plates, ZR2
Frame, fully-boxed, hydroformed front section and a fully-boxed stamped rear section Recovery hooks, front, frame-mounted, Red
ZR2 Suspension Package High-Performance lifted suspension with Multimatic DSSV dampers Steering, Digital Variable Steering Assist this system automatically adjusts steering based on speed, road conditions, and other inputs to reduce driver effort and fatigue Brakes, 4-wheel antilock, 4-wheel disc with DURALIFE rotors Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 10
Mechanical
Brake lining wear indicator
Capless Fuel Fill (Requires (L8T) 6.6L V8 gas engine.)
Exhaust, single, side
Exterior
Wheels, 18" (45.7 cm) Gloss Black with Etched ZR2 logo (STD) Tires, LT305/70R18-126/123R, 35" Goodyear Territory MT
Tire, spare, LT305/70R18-126/123R, 35" M/T
Wheel, 18" aluminum spare
Tire carrier lock keyed cylinder lock that utilizes same key as ignition and door Bumper, front (High gloss Black.)
Bumper, rear (High gloss Black.)
CornerStep, rear bumper
BedStep, Black integrated on forward portion of bed on driver and passenger side Moldings, beltline, Black
Wheelhouse liners, rear
Cargo tie downs (12), fixed rated at 500 lbs per corner Power outlet, bed mounted, 120-volt (400 watts shared with (KI4) interior power outlet) Headlamps, Animated LED projectors LED turn signals and Daytime Running Lamps IntelliBeam, automatic high beam on/off
Taillamps, LED with signature, animated
Lamps, cargo area, cab mounted integrated with center high mount stop lamp, with switch in bank on left side of steering wheel
LED Cargo Area Lighting located in pickup bed, activated with switch on center switch bank or key fob Fog lamps, front, LED
Lamps, Smoked Amber roof marker, (LED) (Not available with (YF5) California state emissions requirements.) Mirrors, outside power-adjustable vertical trailering with heated and auto-dimming upper glass, (driver and passenger) lower convex mirrors, turn signal indicators, puddle lamps, (U12) perimeter lighting, auxiliary lighting, power folding/extending (extends 3.31" [84.25mm])
Mirror caps, high-gloss Black
Glass, deep-tinted
Wipers, front rain-sensing
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 11
Exterior
Chevytec spray-on bedliner Black (does not include spray-on liner on tailgate due to Black composite inner panel)
Tailgate, Multi-Flex with six functional load/access features, NOTE: Auto release can be disabled if ball hitch is installed. See Owner's manual for details
Tailgate and bed rail protection cap, top
Tailgate, gate function manual with EZ Lift includes power lock and release (Required and only available with (QK2) Multi-Flex tailgate.)
Door handles, high gloss Black
Entertainment
Audio system, Chevrolet Infotainment 3 Premium system with Google built-in compatibility (select service plan required, terms and limitations apply) including navigation capability, 13.4" diagonal HD color touchscreen, includes multi-touch display, AM/FM stereo, Bluetooth streaming audio for music and most phones; featuring Wireless Apple CarPlay and Wireless Android Auto capability for compatible phones, advanced voice recognition, in-vehicle apps, personalized profiles for infotainment and vehicle settings (STD) SiriusXM Trial Subscription
SiriusXM with 360L Trial Subscription. SiriusXM with 360L transforms your customers' ride with our most extensive and personalized radio experience on the road. (IMPORTANT: The SiriusXM trial subscription is not provided on vehicles that are ordered for Fleet Daily Rental ("FDR") use. Trial subscription is subject to the SiriusXM Customer Agreement and privacy policy, visit www.siriusxm.com which includes full terms and how to cancel. All fees, content, features, and availability are subject to change. Some features require GM connected vehicle services.)
Bose Sound System, premium 7-speaker system with Richbass woofer Wireless phone projection for Apple CarPlay and Android Auto Steering wheel audio controls
Bluetooth for phone connectivity to vehicle infotainment system Wi-Fi Hotspot capable (Terms and limitations apply. See onstar.com or dealer for details.) Interior
Seats, front bucket with center console, for Crew Cab and Double Cab models (STD) Perforated leather front seat trim
Seating, heated driver and front outboard passenger
Seats, ventilated driver and front passenger
Seat adjuster, driver 10-way power including lumbar
Seat adjuster, passenger 10-way power including lumbar
Driver memory recalls driver "presets" for power driver seat and outside mirrors Seats, heated second row outboard seats
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 12
Interior
Seat, Up-level Rear with Storage Package 60/40 Split rear seat with center armrest, right, and left seat back storage, and under seat jack storage (Crew Cabs Only) Rear seat leather appointed (Rear seat features leather seating surfaces.)
Center Console, floor-mounted with cup holders, cell phone storage, power cord management, hanging file folder capability
Floor covering, color-keyed carpeting
LPO, All-weather floor liners 1st and 2nd rows on Crew Cab and Double Cab, (includes Chevrolet Bowtie logo on front mats)
Steering wheel, wrapped
Steering wheel, heated
Steering column, manual tilt and telescoping
Driver Information Center, enhanced, 12.3" diagonal reconfigurable multicolor digital display Exterior Temperature Display located in radio display
Compass located in instrument cluster
Multicolor 15" Diagonal Head-Up Display (Included and only available with (CWM) Technology Package.) Rear Seat Reminder
Window, power front, drivers express up/down
Window, power front, passenger express up/down
Windows, power rear, express down
Window, power, rear sliding with rear defogger
Door locks, power
Remote vehicle starter system
Keyless Open and Start
Universal Home Remote
Adaptive Cruise Control (Included and only available with (CWM) Technology Package.) Theft-deterrent system, unauthorized entry
Wireless Charging (Not compatible with all phones. Compliant batteries include QI and PMA technologies.

Reference Mobile devices manual to confirm what type of battery it uses.) USB Ports, 2, Charge/Data ports located on instrument panel USB Ports, 2, Charge/Data ports located inside center console USB ports, rear, dual, charge-only
Power outlet, interior, 120-volt (400 watts shared with (KC9) bed mounted power outlet) Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 13
Interior
Air conditioning, dual-zone automatic climate control
Air vents, rear, heating/cooling
Defogger, rear-window electric
Rear Camera Mirror, inside rearview auto-dimming with full camera display (Included and only available with (CWM) Technology Package.)
Assist handles front A-pillar mounted for driver and passenger, rear B-pillar mounted Chevrolet Connected Access capable (Subject to terms. See onstar.com or dealer for details.) Safety-Mechanical
Automatic Emergency Braking
Front Pedestrian Braking
StabiliTrak stability control system with Proactive Roll Avoidance and traction control, includes electronic trailer sway control and hill start assist
Safety-Exterior
Daytime Running Lamps with automatic exterior lamp control Safety-Interior
Airbags, Dual-stage frontal airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; Seat-mounted side-impact airbags for driver and front outboard passenger; Head-curtain airbags for front and rear outboard seating positions; Includes front outboard Passenger Sensing System for frontal outboard passenger airbag (Always use seat belts and child restraints. Children are safer when properly secured in a rear seat in the appropriate child restraint. See the Owner's Manual for more information.) OnStar Services capable (See onstar.com for details and limitations. Services vary by model. Service plan required.)
Front and Rear Park Assist, ultrasonic
HD Surround Vision
Bed View Camera camera in the CHMSL to show a view of the cargo bed, display located in infotainment screen, includes Two Trailer Camera Provisions
Trailer Camera Provisions and trailer viewing software
Hitch Guidance dynamic single line to aid in trailer alignment for hitching Hitch Guidance with Hitch View
In-Vehicle Trailering App, System includes checklist, trailer maintenance reminders, trailer security alerts, trailer mileage, tow/haul reminder, trailer electrical diagnostics and Trailer Tire Pressure Monitor System module Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Trailer Side Blind Zone Alert
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 14
Safety-Interior
Lane Departure Warning
Following Distance Indicator
Forward Collision Alert
Seat Belt Adjustable Guide Loops, front row only
Buckle to Drive prevents vehicle from being shifted out of Park until driver seat belt is fastened; times out after 20 seconds and encourages seat belt use, can be turned on and off in Settings menu Rear Seat Belt Indicator
Safety Alert Seat
Teen Driver a configurable feature that lets you activate customizable vehicle settings associated with a key fob, to help encourage safe driving behavior. It can limit certain available vehicle features, and it prevents certain safety systems from being turned off. An in-vehicle report card gives you information on driving habits and helps you to continue to coach your new driver
Tire Pressure Monitoring System
OnStar Basics (OnStar Fleet Basics for Fleet) Drive confidently with core OnStar services including remote commands, built-in voice assistance, real-time traffic and navigation, and Automatic Crash Response to help if you're in need. (Requires (UE1) OnStar. OnStar Basics includes remote commands, Navigation, Voice Assistance, and Automatic Crash Response, for eligible vehicles with compatible software. OnStar Basics is standard for 8 years; OnStar plan, working electrical system, cell reception and GPS signal required. OnStar links to emergency services. Service coverage varies with conditions and location. Service availability, features and functionality vary by device and software version. See onstar.com for details and limitations.) Processing-Other
Trailering Information Label provides max trailer ratings for tongue weight, conventional, gooseneck and 5th wheel trailering

WARRANTY
Basic Years: 3
Basic Miles/km: 36,000
Drivetrain Years: 5
Drivetrain Miles/km: 60,000
Drivetrain Note: 3.0L & 6.6L Duramax® Turbo-Diesel engines, and certain commercial, government, and qualified fleet vehicles: 5 years/100,000 miles
Corrosion Years (Rust-Through): 6
Corrosion Years: 3
Corrosion Miles/km (Rust-Through): 100,000
Corrosion Miles/km: 36,000
Roadside Assistance Years: 5
Roadside Assistance Miles/km: 60,000
Roadside Assistance Note: 3.0L & 6.6L Duramax® Turbo-Diesel engines, and certain commercial, government, and qualified fleet vehicles: 5 years/100,000 miles
Maintenance Note: First Visit: 12 Months/12,000 Miles
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 15
Technical Specifications
Powertrain
Transmission
Drivetrain Four Wheel Drive Trans Order Code MKM
Trans Type 10 Trans Description Cont. Automatic
Trans Description Cont. Again N/A First Gear Ratio (:1) 4.54 Second Gear Ratio (:1) 2.87 Third Gear Ratio (:1) 2.06
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1) 1.72 Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) 1.48
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1) 1.26 Reverse Ratio (:1) 4.54
Clutch Size N/A Trans Power Take Off N/A
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1) N/A Transfer Case Model N/A Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), High N/A Transfer Case Gear Ratio (:1), Low N/A Transfer Case Power Take Off N/A Seventh Gear Ratio (:1) 1.00 Eighth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.85 Ninth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.69
Tenth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.63
Mileage
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy N/A Cruising Range - City N/A EPA Fuel Economy Est - City N/A Fuel Economy Est-Combined N/A Cruising Range - Hwy N/A Estimated Battery Range N/A
Engine
Engine Order Code L8T Engine Type Gas V8
Displacement 6.6L/-TBD- Fuel System Direct Injection
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM 401 @ 5200 SAE Net Torque @ RPM 464 @ 4000 Engine Oil Cooler Yes
Electrical
Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (Primary) 720 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (2nd) 700 Cold Cranking Amps @ 0° F (3rd) N/A Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps) 220 Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 16
Powertrain
Cooling System
Total Cooling System Capacity N/A
Traction Battery
Usable/net Traction Battery Capacity
(kWh)
N/A Gross Traction Battery Capacity (kWh) N/A
Vehicle
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year N/A EPA Greenhouse Gas Score N/A Chassis
Weight Information
Standard Weight - Front 0.00 lbs Standard Weight - Rear 0.00 lbs Base Curb Weight N/A Gross Axle Wt Rating - Front 5200 lbs Gross Axle Wt Rating - Rear 6600 lbs Curb Weight - Front 4013 lbs Curb Weight - Rear 2812 lbs Option Weight - Front 0.00 lbs Option Weight - Rear 0.00 lbs Reserve Axle Capacity - Front 1187.00 lbs Reserve Axle Capacity - Rear 3788.00 lbs As Spec'd Curb Weight 6825.00 lbs As Spec'd Payload 4200.00 lbs Maximum Payload Capacity 4200.00 lbs Gross Combined Wt Rating 26000 lbs Gross Axle Weight Rating 11800.00 lbs Curb Weight 6825.00 lbs Reserve Axle Capacity 4975.00 lbs Total Option Weight 0.00 lbs Payload Weight Front 0 lbs Payload Weight Rear 0 lbs Gross Vehicle Weight Rating 11025.00 lbs Trailering
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. 5000 lbs Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. 500 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. 16000 lbs Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. 1600 lbs Fifth Wheel Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. 18100 lbs Fifth Wheel Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. 4525 lbs Maximum Trailering Capacity 18500 lbs
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 17
Chassis
Frame
Frame Type Hydroformed Sect Modulus Rails Only N/A
Frame RBM N/A Frame Strength N/A
Frame Thickness N/A
Suspension
Suspension Type - Front Short/Long Arm Suspension Type - Rear Multi-Leaf Springs Spring Capacity - Front N/A Spring Capacity - Rear N/A
Axle Type - Front N/A Axle Type - Rear N/A
Axle Capacity - Front N/A Axle Capacity - Rear N/A
Axle Ratio (:1) - Front N/A Axle Ratio (:1) - Rear 3.73 Shock Absorber Diameter - Front 51 mm Shock Absorber Diameter - Rear 51 mm Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Front 1.38 in Stabilizer Bar Diameter - Rear N/A Tires
Front Tire Order Code QMG Rear Tire Order Code QMG
Spare Tire Order Code QNZ Front Tire Size LT305/70R18
Rear Tire Size LT305/70R18 Spare Tire Size LT305/70R18
Front Tire Capacity N/A Rear Tire Capacity N/A
Spare Tire Capacity N/A Revolutions/Mile @ 45 mph - Front N/A Revolutions/Mile @ 45 mph - Rear N/A Revolutions/Mile @ 45 mph - Spare N/A Wheels
Front Wheel Size 18 x -TBD- in Rear Wheel Size 18 x -TBD- in Spare Wheel Size 18 x -TBD- in Front Wheel Material N/A Rear Wheel Material N/A Spare Wheel Material N/A
Steering
Steering Type Pwr Steering Ratio (:1), Overall N/A
Steering Ratio (:1), On Center N/A Steering Ratio (:1), At Lock N/A Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb 52.7 ft Turning Diameter - Wall to Wall N/A Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 18
Chassis
Brakes
Brake Type Pwr Brake ABS System 4-Wheel
Brake ABS System (Second Line) N/A Disc - Front (Yes or ) Yes Disc - Rear (Yes or ) Yes Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness 14.0 x 1.6 in Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness 14.1 x 1.3 in Drum - Rear (Yes or ) N/A Rear Drum Diam x Width N/A
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx 36 gal Aux Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx N/A Fuel Tank Location N/A Aux Fuel Tank Location N/A
Dimensions
Interior Dimensions
Passenger Capacity 5 Front Head Room 43.03 in
Front Leg Room 44.53 in Front Shoulder Room 66.02 in
Front Hip Room 61.18 in Second Head Room 40.12 in
Second Leg Room 43.4 in Second Shoulder Room 65.3 in
Second Hip Room 60.24 in
Exterior Dimensions
Wheelbase 159 in Length, Overall w/o rear bumper N/A
Length, Overall w/rear bumper N/A Length, Overall 250.04 in Width, Max w/o mirrors 81.85 in Height, Overall 82.68 in Overhang, Front N/A Overhang, Rear w/o bumper N/A
Front Bumper to Back of Cab N/A Cab to Axle 42.36 in
Cab to End of Frame N/A Ground to Top of Load Floor N/A Ground to Top of Frame N/A Frame Width, Rear N/A
Ground Clearance, Front 11.61 in Ground Clearance, Rear 11.61 in Body Length 0.00 ft Cab to Body N/A
Winner Chevrolet / Elk Grove Auto Group
Jerry Powers | 916-426-5752 | [email protected]
Vehicle: [Fleet] 2026 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD (CK20743) 4WD Crew Cab 159" ZR2 ( Complete ) At the user's request, prices for this vehicle have been formulated on the basis of Initial Pricing for the vehicle, however GM cannot guarantee that Initial Pricing is available.

Data Version: 29718. Data Updated: Sep 24, 2026 7:39:00 PM UTC.

Sep 25, 2026 Page 19
Dimensions
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Box Length @ Floor 82.25 in Cargo Box Width @ Top, Rear N/A Cargo Box Width @ Floor 71.4 in Cargo Box Width @ Wheelhousings 50.55 in Cargo Box (Area) Height 21 in Tailgate Width N/A
Cargo Volume 69.5 ft³ Ext'd Cab Cargo Volume N/A

EXHIBIT B
Estimate
Customer No.:

Quote No.:

Quote To: Ship To:

Date Ship Via F.O.B. Terms
Purchase Order Number Sales Person Expiration Date
Quantity Item Number Description Unit Price Amount
09/09/26 Up-FIt Shop Origin Net 30
David Burchfield
City of Mendota City of Mendota
643 Quince St
Mendota, CA 93640
643 Quince St
Mendota, CA 93640

MENDOTACITY
18931
160 North Broadway
Fresno, CA 93701-1592
Required
10/09/26
Phone:(559) 233-8818
Email:

Phone:(559) 655-3291 Phone: (559) 655-3291
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
2026 CHEVY 2500
***PATROL BUILD***
UNIT# TBD

LIGHTING ANS SIREN
****EQUIPMENT****
***FEDERAL SIGNAL***
***PROMO PACKAGE***
****************************
VALR51J Federal Signal 51" Valor
2 Color LightbarBar.

VALR51J-P1BH
1 3031.00 3031.00
HKB-TAH21-HP Fed Sig Hi Performance
Hook Kit
fits '21 Chevy Tahoe
1 0.00 0.00
PF200S17B Federal Signal Pathfinder
200W Siren Amp with 17
Button Remote Controller
1 1340.00 1340.00
PFSPLTR-4 Federal Signal
4-to-1 splitter
1 44.00 44.00
1 OBDCABLE20-5 Fed Sig OBDll Cable 137.00 137.00
ES100C Federal Signal 100 watt
Siren Speaker
1 0.00 0.00
ESB-U Universal Siren Bracket
for ES100 Siren
1 0.00 0.00
EXPMOD24 Fed Sig Expansion Module
24 Channel
1 265.00 265.00
****************************
ES100C Federal Signal 100 watt
Siren Speaker
1 281.00 281.00
ESB-U Universal Siren Bracket
for ES100 Siren
1 36.00 36.00
Thank You
Estimate
Customer No.:

Quote No.:

Quote To: Ship To:

MENDOTACITY
18931
160 North Broadway
Fresno, CA 93701-1592
Required
10/09/26
Phone:(559) 233-8818
Email:

Phone:(559) 655-3291 Phone: (559) 655-3291
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]

SIDE FACING LIGHTING

SIDE MIRROR LIGHTS
MPSW9-RBW Fed Sig Micropulse WideAngle
9 LED Light
R/B/W
2 207.00 414.00
MPSMW9-SIL19MIR Fed Sig Mirror Mount Kit
fits Chevy Silverado 1500
1 32.00 32.00

RUNNINGBOARD LIGHTS
DR6-RBW Fed Sig Running Board Light
6' Red/White Blue
2 1548.00 3096.00
DR6BKT-RB-TAH21B Fed Sig 6' Running Board
Mounting Brackets
fits '21-'25 Chevy Tahoe
2 53.00 106.00

REARFACING LIGHTING
MPS123U-RBW Fed Sig Micropulse Ultra
TriColor Light
Red/Blue/White
2 197.00 394.00

MOUNTED ON THE TAILGATE
416918-RBW FS Corner LED
Red/Blue
Old P/N 416900Z-RB
2 96.00 192.00

MOUNTED ON THE REAR

BUMPER STEP

MISC HARDWARE
BK0802CHT242500 Setina PD450L
WITH 4 FEDERAL SIGNAL MICROPULSE
TRI-COLOR 18-LED R/B/W LIGHTS
1 1138.00 1138.00
CC-WBOS-20 Troy 20" Wide Body Console
Universal Fit
8" Sloped 12" Level
1 652.00 652.00
1 AC-CHV19-MNT Troy Console Floor Plate 0.00 0.00
Thank You
Estimate
Customer No.:

Quote No.:

Quote To: Ship To:

MENDOTACITY
18931
160 North Broadway
Fresno, CA 93701-1592
Required
10/09/26
Phone:(559) 233-8818
Email:

Phone:(559) 655-3291 Phone: (559) 655-3291
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
fits '19-'20 Chevy Silverado
FP-PLATINUM Troy 4" Face Plate for
FS Pathfinder
17 Button Control Head
1 0.00 0.00
FP-KENKCH20R Troy 3" Faceplate
fits Kenwood NX5700/5800
KCH20R Control Head
1 0.00 0.00
3 FP-BLNK2 2" Blank Troy Face Plate 0.00 0.00
1 FP-BLNK1 1" Blank Troy Face Plate 0.00 0.00
2 AC-MCM1 Troy Mic Clip 16.00 32.00
AC-TB-ARMMNT-58 Troy Side Mount Arm Rest
Rotoates 360' & Flips Up
1 170.00 170.00
AC-INBHG Troy 4" Dual Beverage
Holder
1 51.00 51.00
CM-SDMT-SL-LED Troy Heavy Duty Sliding
Docking Station/Laptop
Mount System
Old p/n CM-SDMT-SL-GJ30
1 471.00 471.00
DS-PAN-1115N Havis Standard Docking
Station. Fits Panasonic CF33
w/ Power Supply
Old P/N DS-PAN-1115
1 1092.00 1092.00
GM-SGRF-MNT Troy Dual Weapon Rack
Adjustable. No Locks
1 282.00 282.00
1 SC-1 Gun lock for 870 125.00 125.00
SC-6 Santa Cruz Universal Gun
Lock for Extra Large
Weapons. Specify Key Type.

Old p/n SC5-XL
1 202.00 202.00
G5021UT-V ProGard Weapon Rack
870 w/ Pistol Grip &
Side Saddle
1 354.00 354.00
Thank You
Estimate
Customer No.:

Quote No.:

Quote To: Ship To:

MENDOTACITY
18931
160 North Broadway
Fresno, CA 93701-1592
Required
10/09/26
Phone:(559) 233-8818
Email:

Phone:(559) 655-3291 Phone: (559) 655-3291
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
TP-E-SL6-FS-SS Troy Full Size Partition
Recess Panel, Sliding Window
Square Hole Punched
1 848.00 848.00
PM-21TH Trpy Partition Mount
fits '21 Chevy Tahoe
1 0.00 0.00
KP-CHV19-SS Troy Kick Panel Assembly
3 Pcs. No Foot Pockets
Fits 19 & up Silverado 1500
1 203.00 203.00
WK0595CHT202500 Setina Window Barrier
Polycarbonate
FOR USE WITH:
-All Door Panels
2020-current
1 314.00 314.00
WK0595CHT202500P Setina Rear Window Barrier
Polycarbonate
2020- Current
1 314.00 314.00

COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
NX-5700BK Kenwood 50 watt, 1024CH
136-174MHz, RF Deck
3 Year Warranty
1 621.00 621.00
NX-5800BK Kenwood 50 watt, 1024CH
450-520MHz, RF Deck
3 Year Warranty
1 621.00 621.00
KWD-5004MR Kenwood License Key for
Multiple RF Decks
2 0.00 0.00
5AFMM-MR Kenwood NX5000 Dual Deck
Single Head Dual Speaker
Remote Mount Kit
1 1087.00 1087.00
2 RFU505ST PL259 For RG58 10.00 20.00
ROOF-FT-NITI Stico Flexi-Whip Antenna
136mhz-1ghz. Includes
coax.
2 104.00 208.00
Thank You
Estimate
Customer No.:

Quote No.:

Quote To: Ship To:

MENDOTACITY
18931
160 North Broadway
Fresno, CA 93701-1592
Required
10/09/26
Phone:(559) 233-8818
Email:

Phone:(559) 655-3291 Phone: (559) 655-3291
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
MMSU-1 Magnetic Mic
Conversion Kit
2 42.00 84.00

TRUCKBED ACCESORIES
GH20S-HD-MX-C12 DiamondBack Bed Covers
DiamondBack HD
Vehicle: 2020-2026 Chevy Silverado
2500/3500 / 6'10" bed
Finish: Smooth Black
Anchor Cleats: Preinstalled
1 2777.00 2777.00
T-CHSILM2-20S-P5 TruckVault Magnum 2 Drawer
Custom Vault for
Chevy Silverado 2500/3500
6' 10" Bed
4,425.00 1,239.00 3,186.00
Magnum Height
2 Drawer
Vehicle Year: 2026
Bed Length: 6' 8"
Exterior Carpet: Black
Interior Carpet: Grey
Drawer Front(s) Black Composite
2 Dwr TacLocks w/Key Override
1 3806.00 3806.00

MISC INSTALLATION PARTS
5029B-BSS 12 Circuit Water Resistant
Fuse Block w/Cover
1 42.00 42.00
5029 TAH MNT Mounting Bracket for 5029
Fuse Block.

Fits Chevy Tahoe
1 50.00 50.00
7189B-BSS Resettable Circuit Breaker
Resettable Circuit Breaker
1 47.00 47.00
2 5080 Relay 14.00 28.00
7615B-BSS Blue Seas Solenoid/Timer.
120amp 12vdc
1 124.00 124.00
1 NUS-2X Nu-Tech Roof Entry Port 25.00 25.00
Thank You
Estimate
Customer No.:

Quote No.:

Quote To: Ship To:

MENDOTACITY
18931
160 North Broadway
Fresno, CA 93701-1592
Required
10/09/26
Phone:(559) 233-8818
Email:

Phone:(559) 655-3291 Phone: (559) 655-3291
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
MATERIALSFEE3 Installation Material
Bundle
1 400.00 400.00
SEATDISPOSAL Seat Disposal Fee
Fee will be waived if seat
is picked up at time of
vehicle pick up.
1 25.00 25.00

46.000 LAISUPFIT Upfitting Installation 165.00 7590.00
Subtotal
Freight charges
Sales tax @ 8.35000%
Total
33171.00
700.00
2767.69
36638.69
We appreciate your continued patronage
Thank You
1 AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JEFFREY O’NEAL, AICP, CITY PLANNER
BY: ALEJANDRA LOPEZ GONZALEZ, ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, PREZONE, ANNEXATION, VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR THE TRACT NO. 6541 PROJECT
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 2026
ISSUE
Shall the City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-71, approving a General Plan Amendment (“GPA”), annexation, Planned Development, and Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (“VTSM”) for the Tract No. 6541 Project, initiate and waive the first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 26-04, prezoning the Project site to the R-1 and P-F zone district, and adopt an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration finding that such approvals would not result in significant adverse environmental effects?

BACKGROUND
Yamabe & Horn Engineering Inc. (“Applicant”), on behalf of Crown Homes, has submitted an application for the development of a 271-lot residential subdivision on an approximately 53.43- acre portion of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (“APN”) 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST (“Project site”). The Project site is located outside the City of Mendota’s (“City”) current city limits and its Sphere of Influence (“SOI”), adjacent to the west side of Amador Avenue and the western extent of the existing city limits. In addition to the 271 single-family residential lot VTSM proposal, the Project includes a request to annex the Project site into the City of Mendota, contingent upon the amendment of the City’s SOI, which has already been initiated. Additionally, the Project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN 012-190-25ST to Medium Density Residential (limited to the Project site boundaries) while concurrently amending the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone the same area to the R-1 zone district (SingleFamily/Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation. The Project also proposes to prezone the portion of the Project site on APN 012-160-25ST to the P-F (Public Facilities) zone district, consistent with the underlying Public Facility land use designation for this parcel. The application also requests the Project be processed as a Planned Development.

At its regular meeting on June 2, 2026, the Mendota City Council adopted Resolution No. 26-28, forwarding a request to amend the City’s SOI to the Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission and making a finding of exemption under CEQA guidelines Section 15183 for the SOI amendment.

At its regular meeting on September 22, 2026. The Mendota Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 26-04 by a 5-0 vote, forwarding a recommendation to the City Council to 2 approve a GPA, prezone, annexation, VTSM, Planned Development, and an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.

ANALYSIS

GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
As discussed above, the portion of the Project site on APN 012-190-25ST is designated as Low Density Residential by the City’s General Plan Land Use Diagram. The Applicant has proposed to amend the General Plan land use designation for APN 012-190-25ST from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. The proposed Project consists of a 271-lot residential subdivision located on approximately 53.43 acres. Following approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment, the Project would be developed at a density that is consistent with the Medium Density Residential designation and within the density range established in Table 2-4 of the City of Mendota General Plan.

PREZONE
In conjunction with the proposed General Plan Amendment, the Applicant has requested a prezoning of the portions of the Project site on APN 012-190-25ST to the R-1 (Single Family/Medium Density Residential) zone district and on APN 012-160-25ST to the P-F (Public Facilities) zone district. The proposed R-1 and P-F prezoning designations would be consistent with the General Plan designations for the Project site, as proposed.

VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
The Applicant submitted a VTSM for the subdivision of the Project site into 271 single family residential lots. In addition to the residential lots, the VTSM proposes an approximately 4.21 acre storm drainage basin, and the extension of Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue with one lane in each direction. Staff have reviewed the VTSM and have placed conditions on it, as appropriate.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
The Project has applied for a Planned Development application in order to be granted flexibility from the ordinary development standards required by the R-1 zone district. Under the Planned Development, the Project would result in lots that are smaller than the 6,000 square foot standard lot area prescribed by the R-1 zone district standards and lots would be lesser in width than the typical R-1 standards. Mendota Municipal Code Section 17.84.030(B) requires that planned developments provide a minimum of 10% of the site be developed, or improved and dedicated to the City, as open space. New parks and recreational facilities are not included as a part of the Project design. However, the City has indicated that it will be taking a Zoning Text Amendment for consideration to remove this requirement. Approval of the Project as proposed will be conditioned such that the aforementioned Zoning Text Amendment is adopted by the City Council prior to final map consideration.

SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
The subject properties are currently located outside of the City limits and outside of the City’s adopted SOI. The Project includes a request to annex the Project site into the City of Mendota, contingent upon the amendment of the City’s SOI, which has already been initiated. 3 ANNEXATION
The subject parcels would be annexed to the City as a part of the Project. As the Project site is located adjacent to the current city limits, annexation of these parcels would be done in a contiguous manner. The City would connect the site to development adjacent to the Project and extend Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue with one lane in each direction. In order for the Project site to be annexed, Fresno LAFCo would be required to approve the previously initiated SOI amendment and a future annexation application including the Project site.

OPEN SPACE
As mentioned above, while the City’s current regulations require that the Project site be developed with open space, the City will be taking a Zoning Text Amendment for consideration of the removal of this requirement. As proposed the VTSM does not include any open space, however the Project would be responsible for paying development impacts fees related to parks and open space. The aforementioned Zoning Text Amendment will be condition to be approved prior to consideration of the Project’s final map.

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
In addition to development of the subdivision, the Project would include a new permanent storm drainage basin, approximately 4.21 acres in size, located immediately north of the subdivision (on APN 012-160-25ST) to accommodate storm water runoff generated by the Project. Water and sewer infrastructure would be required to be installed in order to serve the Project according to current City standards. Approximately one-half mile of new sewer main piping and manholes will extend the existing Westside Sewer Interceptor trunk line from its current terminus on the northside of the existing residential subdivision along Amador Avenue to the southern end of the development. Additionally, improvements to the City wastewater disposal facilities will be required in order to serve the Project in the form of either additional berms to create a 12th pond or in the form of mechanical evaporators. Improvements to the City’s wastewater infrastructure have been made a mitigation measure of the Project as a part of the Project’s Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.

TRAFFIC STUDY
A traffic study was prepared by the Applicant to analyze the impacts of the Project on surrounding roadways and to determine if any improvements to these roadways would be needed as a result of those impacts. The Traffic Study recommended that the Project pay its equitable fair share to improve 4 of the studied intersections for future improvements in the 2047 study horizon. No improvements were recommended to serve the Project on opening day. The four intersections recommended for payment of equitable fair share costs of improvements by 2047 are as follows:
• Smoot/Derrick – 7.9%; traffic signal or roundabout recommended as ultimate improvement
• Belmont/Amador – 14.9%; extension of eastbound left turn lane by 225 feet recommended as ultimate improvement
• Belmont/Derrick – 12.8%; widening to include a dedicated left turn lane and dedicated right turn lane on the southbound approach, and a dedicated right turn lane on the westbound approach are recommended as the ultimate improvement 4 • Belmont/Oller – 15.7%; traffic signal or roundabout recommended as ultimate improvement
The Project has been conditioned to pay its equitable fair share costs for the improvements recommended within the Traffic Study.

ENVIRONMENTAL
The first step in complying with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is to determine whether the activity in question constitutes a “project” as defined by CEQA, Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations Section 15000, et seq. The second step is to determine whether the project is subject to or exempt from the statute. This proposal qualifies as a project under CEQA because it involves the issuance to a person of a “lease, permit, license, certificate, or other entitlement for use” as described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15378.

Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA Guidelines Sections 15070 through 15075, an Initial Study was prepared to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the Project. Based on the analysis contained in the Initial Study, it was determined that the Project would not result in significant adverse environmental effects with mitigation measures incorporated. Accordingly, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and is attached to Resolution No. 26-71.

PUBLIC NOTICE
In accordance with Mendota Municipal Code (MMC) Section 17.08.040(F), a Notice of Public Hearing was published in The Business Journal on September 25, 2026. It was also sent via US Mail to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed Project and posted at City Hall and on the City’s website.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS
The following findings, pursuant to MMC Section 17.84.050, have been made in relation to the Planned Development:

1. The proposed planned development is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific or community plan, including the density and intensity limitations that may apply.

The proposed VTSM has been reviewed for compliance with the City’s General Plan, the Mendota Subdivision Ordinance, and the Mendota Zoning Ordinance. As conditioned, the Project meets all applicable design and improvement requirements. As part of the Project, the Applicant proposes a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential. Upon approval of the General Plan Amendment, the Project would conform to the applicable land use designation and density standards established by the General Plan. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the General Plan.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the development being proposed.
5 The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The Project site is planned for residential development by the City’s General Plan and the Project would result in residential uses being developed on the property. After reviewing the VTSM, it has been determined that the Project site is suitable for the type of development being proposed.

3. Adequate transportation facilities, utilities, and public services exist or will be provided in accordance with the approval of the planned development to serve the proposed development, and approval of the planned development will not result in adverse impacts to existing facilities, utilities, or services so as to be a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare.

As part of the Project a storm drainage basin, water, sewer, and transportation infrastructure would be constructed to serve the Project. Expansion of the City’s wastewater disposal facility’s capacity would be required in order to serve the Project. 25% percent of the units proposed may be accommodated prior to completion of these improvements, however the remaining units proposed by the Project may not be granted occupancy before the improvements to the wastewater disposal facilities are complete. The Project will be required to pay its fair share percentage to future impacts to the City’s circulation system, however, the City is the public services provider and is expected to be able to serve the Project for all other services without other off-site improvements being required on opening day. As conditioned, the Project would not be a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare of the City of Mendota.

4. The proposed development will not have a substantial adverse impact on surrounding land uses, and will be compatible with the existing and planned land use character of the surrounding area.

The Project would result in the construction of 271 single-family residential lot VTSM on land that is currently planned for Low Density Residential land uses. While the Project would amend the land use density to Medium Density Residential, the Project results in the development of a residential project on land planned for such usage. The Project would develop the Project at a density that would be similar to the existing neighborhood east of Amador Avenue and would therefore be compatible with other existing nearby uses.

5. The proposed development generally complies with any adopted design guidelines.

6. The proposed development is demonstrably superior to the development that could occur utilizing the standards applicable to the subject zone district, and will achieve superior community design, environmental preservation, and/or substantial public benefit. In making this determination, factors to be considered shall include, but not be limited to:

1. Appropriateness of the use(s) at the proposed location; 6 2. The mix of uses, housing types, and housing price levels;

3. Provision of infrastructure improvements;

4. Provision of usable active or passive open space;

5. Compatibility of uses within the planned development area;

6. Creativity in design and use of land;

7. Quality of design, and adequacy of light and air into the interior spaces of buildings; and

8. Overall enhancement of neighborhood character and the built and natural environments of the city.

The Applicant has proposed a Planned Development in order to enjoy the benefits of a less strict enforcement of the normal development standards of the R-1 zone district. This will allow the builder to provide a housing product at a price point that the residents of Mendota will benefit from. Besides lot area and width, no other development standards have been reduced from what would normally be required in the R-1 zone district. While the Project does not provide the minimum 10% open space required by Planned Developments, staff will be taking a Zoning Text Amendment to the City Council in the near future to evaluate if that requirement should be removed. The adoption of an ordinance removing this requirement is required prior to the Project’s final map being considered. Staff are supportive of the use of a Planned Development in order to reduce lot area and width as proposed.

GROUNDS FOR APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
The Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code § 66474) requires cities make the following findings prior to approval of a tentative map:

1. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

The Project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. The Project site is planned for residential development by the City’s General Plan and the Project would result in residential uses being developed on the property. After reviewing the VTSM, it has been determined that the Project site is suitable for the type of development being proposed. 7 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The Project proposes a General Plan Amendment to amend the land use designation of the Project site to Medium Density Residential. If approved, the Project would develop within the density range allowed by the Medium Density Residential land use.

The Project site has been determined to be adequate for the type of density proposed within the development.

5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure a fish or wildlife habitat.

An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project. With adoption of this document and implementation of the mitigation measures included within its mitigation, monitoring, and reporting program, significant impacts resulting from the Project on the environment and fish and wildlife habitat would not occur.

6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

There is no evidence in the record that the Project is likely to cause any serious public health problems. The Project proposes a residential use in an area planned for such usage and would be developed consistent with the City’s development standards, as conditioned.

7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

The Project would not conflict with any existing easements acquired by the public at large.

FISCAL IMPACT
Costs for processes initiated by applicants are paid for through application fees. There is no impact to the General Fund or other City funds. The City will also collect development impact fees from the Project, as applicable, for the construction and maintenance of City infrastructure and services.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends City Council adopt Resolution No. 26-71, approving the proposed GPA, VTSM, Planned Development, and initiating annexation of the Project. Additionally, staff recommend that the City Council initiate and waive the first reading by title only of Ordinance No. 26-04, prezoning the Project site to the R-1 and P-F zone district and that the City Councils adopts the Project’s Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. 8 Attachments:

1. Vicinity Map

2. Aerial Map

3. General Plan Land Use Map

4. Proposed General Plan Land Use Map

5. Zoning Map

6. Proposed Zoning Map

7. Traffic Study

8. Resolution No. 26-71

9. Ordinance No. 26-04
Attachment 1: Vicinity Map
Attachment 2: Aerial Map
Attachment 3: General Plan Land Use Map
Attachment 4: Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation Attachment 5: Zoning Map
Attachment 6: Proposed Zoning Map
Attachment 7: Traffic Study

TRAFFIC STUDY
Proposed Residential Development
West of Amador Avenue
Mendota, California
Prepared For:

Crown Homes
5320 East Pine Avenue
Fresno, California 93727
Date:

June 8, 2026
Job No.:
25-040.01
862 Pollasky Avenue ♦ Clovis, California 93612 ♦ (559) 299-1544 ♦ www.peters-engineering.com Mr. Joseph Crown June 8, 2026
Crown Homes
5320 East Pine Avenue
Fresno, California 93727
Subject: Traffic Study
Proposed Residential Development
West of Amador Avenue
Mendota, California
Dear Mr. Crown:

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of a traffic study for a proposed residential development in Mendota, California. This study focuses on the anticipated effect of vehicle traffic resulting from the Project and includes a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) screening. The traffic study was prepared in general conformance with City of Mendota requirements.

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed single-family residential subdivision covers approximately 49.99 acres located west of the existing segment of Amador Avenue, extending roughly from north of Gonzalez Street to south of Silva Street. The Project proposes 271 single-family homes. Access to the site will be via three local streets connecting to Amador Avenue. It is our understanding that the Project will also extend Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue with one lane in each direction.

The Project site location is presented in the attached Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map, and the Project site plan is presented in the attached Figure 2, Site Plan.

3.0 STUDY AREA AND TIME PERIOD
A scoping letter requesting agency comments on the scope of the traffic study was prepared on October 8, 2025. The scoping letter and agency responses are presented in Appendix A.

The study locations and the requirements of the analyses were identified on cooperation with City of Mendota and Caltrans staff. This report includes operational analysis of the following intersections:

1. Oller Street (SR 180) and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

2. Smoot Avenue and Sorenson Avenue

3. Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

4. Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue Extension

5. Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

6. Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 2
The study time periods include the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours determined between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. The peak hours are analyzed for the following conditions:
• Existing Conditions;
• Existing-Plus-Project Conditions;
• Near-Term Conditions With Project (Includes Approved and Pending Projects); and • Long-Term (Year 2047) Conditions With Project.

4.0 OPERATIONAL ANALYSES CRITERIA

4.1 Level of Service
The Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition, (HCM) defines level of service (LOS) as, “A quantitative stratification of a performance measure or measures that represent quality of service, measured on an A-F scale, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions from the traveler’s perspective and LOS F the worst.” Automobile mode LOS characteristics for both unsignalized and signalized intersections are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1
Level of Service Characteristics for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)
A 0-10
B >10-15
C >15-25
D >25-35
E >35-50
F >50
Table 2
Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of
Service Description Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)
A
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. <10 B
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is very short. >10-20
C
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is favorable or cycle length is moderate. >20-35
D
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is ineffective or cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.
>35-55
E
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is unfavorable and cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >55-80 F
Volume-to-capacity ratio is greater than 1.0. Progression is very poor and cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. >80 Reference for Tables 1 and 2: Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022 Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 3

4.1.1 City of Mendota
Policy C-1.2 of the City of Mendota General Plan states that the City shall: “Seek to maintain operations on all roadways and intersections at Level of Service C or better at all times, including peak travel times, unless maintaining this Level of Service would, in the City's judgment, be infeasible and/or conflict with the achievement of other goals.

Congestion in excess of Level of Service C may be accepted in these cases, provided that provisions are made to improve traffic flow and/or promote non-vehicular transportation as part of a development project or a City-initiated project.”

4.1.2 State Highways
Caltrans has historically endeavored to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D, but does not currently identify a specific LOS goal.

4.1.3 Study Criteria
For purposes of this study, a traffic issue may require improvements if the proposed Project will decrease the LOS below C at a City of Mendota intersection, or if the Project will exacerbate conditions at a City of Mendota intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS D to LOS E).

For purposes of this study, a traffic issue will be recognized at State facilities if the analyses identify LOS E or F at an intersection. LOS E and F can be indicative of delays that may lead to safety concerns at unsignalized intersections. A traffic issue will also be identified if the Project will exacerbate conditions at State intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS E to LOS F).

4.2 Intersection Queuing Criteria
A queuing deficiency is identified in the existing condition if the calculated 95th-percentile queue length exceeds the storage length by more than 25 feet (the average storage length for one vehicle) since the bay taper can typically store one vehicle. A queuing issue is determined if the Project causes the calculated 95th-percentile queue length to exceed the existing or planned storage capacity of a lane by more than 25 feet. In storage lanes that are already deficient without the Project, a queuing issue is determined if the Project increases the calculated 95th-percentile queue length by at least 25 feet.

5.0 TRIP GENERATION

5.1 Project Vehicle Trip Generation
Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition, are typically used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by proposed projects. Table 3 presents the trip generation estimates for the Project.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 4
Table 3
Project Weekday Trip Generation
Land Use Size Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Rate Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Single-Family
Detached
Housing (210)
271 9.09 2,464 0.70 27:73 51 139 190 0.93 62:38 156 96 252 Reference: Trip Generation Manual, 12th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, August 2025

5.2 Project Vehicle Trip Distribution and Assignment
The distribution of project trips presented was estimated based on the results of previous traffic studies, available routes, the locations of complementary land uses, and engineering judgment. The estimated percentage distribution of Project trips is presented in Figure 3, Project Trip Distribution Percentages. The Project traffic volumes presented in Table 1 were assigned to the adjacent road network in accordance with the trip distribution percentages in Figure 3. The peak-hour Project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4, Project PeakHour Traffic Volumes.

6.0 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Existing peak-hour traffic volumes at the study intersections were determined by performing manual turning-movement counts between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m. and between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. on a weekday. The counts included pedestrians, bicycles, and heavy vehicles. The data sheets are presented in the attached Appendix B and include the date the counts were performed. The existing peak-hour turning movement volumes are presented in Figure 5, Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

7.0 LANE CONFIGURATIONS AND INTERSECTION CONTROL
The lane configurations and intersection control at the study intersections are presented in Figure 6, Lane Configurations and Intersection Control. The lane configurations assumed for the extension of Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue are presented in Figure 6.

8.0 EXISTING-PLUS-PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The Project proposes to construct Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue, which will allow existing traffic volumes to redistribute. The estimated redistributed existing traffic volumes are presented in Figure 7, Redistributed Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

The existing-plus-Project peak-hour turning movement volumes are presented in Figure 8, Existing-Plus-Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes and are the result of adding the traffic volumes in Figures 4 and 7.

9.0 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS
The analyses for the near-term and long-term conditions consider trips expected to be generated by pending and approved projects in the study area. The following projects have been identified:
• Amador Avenue and Smoot Street Extension, which extends partial widths (two lanes in each direction) of Amador Avenue and Smoot Street from their current termini to the intersection of the two. This project is planned to be built in Spring 2026.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 5
• Tract 6305 - Belmont Estates, 315 single-family homes on 75.7 acres north of Belmont Avenue, south of the existing Las Palmas subdivision, and east of the proposed Amador Avenue alignment.

10.0 NEAR-TERM TRAFFIC VOLUMES
The near-term traffic volumes with the Project are presented in Figure 9, Near-Term WithProject Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

11.0 CUMULATIVE YEAR 2047 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Cumulative traffic volumes for the year 2047 were determined using the Fresno Council of Governments (COG) travel model and the COG Increment Method. The base year and horizon year model traffic output used in the analyses presented in the attached Appendix C.

The traffic volumes were extrapolated to the year 2047. Future turning movements were estimated based on the methods presented in Chapter 8 of the Transportation Research Board National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 entitled “Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design.” Cumulative With-Project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 10, Cumulative (Year 2047) With-Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes.

12.0 INTERSECTION ANALYSES
Intersection operational analyses for intersections controlled by stop signs or traffic signals were performed using the computer program Synchro 12, which is based on the HCM procedures for calculating levels of service.

Intersection operational analyses for roundabouts were performed using the Sidra Intersection 10 software with the following options selected:
• Sidra Standard model
• Environmental factor of 1.1 for near-term and 1.05 for year 2047 • Entry/Circ Flow Adjustment set to Medium
• LOS method same as sign control
• HCM delay formula unchecked
• Gap Acceptance Capacity set to Sidra Standard (Akcelik M3D) The California Department of Transportation California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD2026) effective January 18, 2026 presents various criteria (warrants) for determining the need for traffic signals. Warrant 3, Peak Hour, is investigated for all analysis scenarios and the results.

Tables 4 through 7 present the results of the intersection analyses. The intersection analysis sheets are included in the attached Appendix D. Level of service worse than the target LOS are indicated in bold type and are underlined.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 6
Table 4
Intersection LOS Summary –Existing Conditions
Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant Met
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant Met
Oller / Derrick Roundabout 6.9 A 6.6 A
Smoot / Sorenson All-way stop 9.5 A No 7.9 A No
Smoot / Derrick One-way stop 32.4 D No 19.6 C No
Belmont / Amador Does not exist
Belmont / Derrick Signals 18.1 B 19.2 B
Belmont / Oller One-way stop 116.9 F No 32.6 D No
Table 5
Intersection LOS Summary – Existing-Plus-Project Conditions Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant Met
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant Met
Oller / Derrick Roundabout 7.5 A 6.8 A
Smoot / Sorenson All-way stop 9.9 A No 8.1 A No
Smoot / Derrick One-way stop 34.1 D No 20.3 C No
Belmont / Amador One-way stop 9.6 A No 10.7 B No
Belmont / Derrick Signals 18.2 B 18.2 B
Belmont / Oller One-way stop 163.0 F No 45.2 E No
Table 6
Intersection LOS Summary – Near-Term With-Project Conditions Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant Met
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant Met
Oller / Derrick Roundabout 7.9 A 7.0 A
Smoot / Sorenson All-way stop 10.9 B No 9.1 A No
Smoot / Derrick One-way stop 88.0 F No 26.5 D No
Belmont / Amador One-way stop 9.8 A No 11.1 B No
Belmont / Derrick Signals 19.2 B 19.5 B
Belmont / Oller One-way stop >300 F No 104.5 F No
Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 7
Table 7
Intersection LOS Summary – Cumulative 2047 With-Project Conditions Intersection Control
A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant Met
Delay
(sec) LOS Warrant Met
Oller / Derrick Roundabout 8.3 B 8.1 A
Smoot / Sorenson All-way stop 13.0 B No 10.1 B No
Smoot / Derrick One-way stop 109.2 F No 45.8 E No
Belmont / Amador One-way stop 17.8 C No 25.5 D No
Belmont / Derrick Signals 23.3 C 25.9 C
Belmont / Oller One-way stop >300 F Yes >300 F Yes
The results of the intersection operational analyses include an estimate of the 95th-percentile queue lengths at the study intersections. The calculated 95th-percentile queue lengths are presented in Tables 8 and 9. Calculated queue lengths exceeding the existing storage capacity are indicated in bold type and are underlined.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 8
Table 8
Intersection Queuing Summary – A.M. Peak Hour
Intersection Existing
Storage
Capacity
(feet)
95th-Percentile Queue Length (feet)
Approach Existing ExistingPlus-Project
Near-Term
With Project
2047 With
Project
Oller / Derrick
Northeastbound >1,000 43 49 59 71
Southwestbound 60 0 2 2 2
Northwestbound 630 117 138 153 182
Southeastbound >1,000 235 299 315 390
Smoot / Sorenson
Eastbound LTR 600 3 5 23 25
Westbound LTR 590 33 35 48 70
Northbound LTR 615 8 8 8 10
Southbound LTR >1,000 38 43 48 75
Smoot / Derrick
Eastbound L 590 20 23 133 138
Eastbound R 100 28 33 40 43
Northbound L 415 18 18 20 23
Northbound T 415 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Southbound T >1,000 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Belmont / Amador
Eastbound LT >1,000 0 0 3
Westbound TR >1,000 DNS DNS DNS
Southbound LR >1,000 10 15 53
Belmont / Derrick
Eastbound L 100 27 23 25 102
Eastbound T(2)R >1,000 46 73 98 140
Westbound L 100+ 18 18 20 48
Westbound T(2)R 320++ 27 35 41 169
Northbound L 565 8 26 34 133
Northbound T >1,000 34 27 32 188
Northbound R 125 0 0 0 0
Southbound L 335 149 154 192 344
Southbound T >1,000 35 34 41 118
Southbound R >1,000 0 0 0 39
Belmont / Oller
Eastbound L 140 150 175 263 280
Eastbound T >1,000 0 0 0 0
Eastbound R 500 13 20 40 38
Westbound Private 3 3 3 3
Northbound LTR >1,000 18 20 25 25
Southbound LTR 860 0 0 0 0
+ Additional storage capacity exists in a two-way left-turn lane beyond the striped turn lane. ++ One through lane exists beyond 320 feet and provides storage capacity exceeding 1,000 feet.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 9
Table 9
Intersection Queuing Summary – P.M. Peak Hour
Intersection Existing
Storage
Capacity
(feet)
95th-Percentile Queue Length (feet)
Approach Existing ExistingPlus-Project
Near-Term
With Project
2047 With
Project
Oller / Derrick
Northeastbound >1,000 47 49 54 851
Southwestbound 60 1 1 1 2
Northwestbound 630 91 103 110 191
Southeastbound >1,000 126 150 167 269
Smoot / Sorenson
Eastbound LTR 600 0 3 8 10
Westbound LTR 590 18 20 38 55
Northbound LTR 615 3 3 3 8
Southbound LTR >1,000 13 15 18 23
Smoot / Derrick
Eastbound L 590 3 3 25 45
Eastbound R 100 10 10 13 18
Northbound L 415 10 10 15 20
Northbound T 415 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Southbound T >1,000 DNS DNS DNS DNS
Belmont / Amador
Eastbound LT >1,000 3 3 5
Westbound TR >1,000 DNS DNS DNS
Southbound LR >1,000 13 15 60
Belmont / Derrick
Eastbound L 100 77 52 59 213
Eastbound T(2)R >1,000 46 68 85 160
Westbound L 100+ 32 30 34 93
Westbound T(2)R 320++ 50 72 108 173
Northbound L 565 20 58 78 122
Northbound T >1,000 134 107 128 236
Northbound R 125 0 0 0 9
Southbound L 335 131 117 148 242
Southbound T >1,000 50 41 48 206
Southbound R >1,000 0 0 0 22
Belmont / Oller
Eastbound L 140 40 53 108 330
Eastbound T >1,000 0 0 0 0
Eastbound R 500 20 25 35 58
Westbound Private 3 3 3 5
Northbound LTR >1,000 8 13 20 25
Southbound LTR 860 0 0 0 0
+ Additional storage capacity exists in a two-way left-turn lane beyond the striped turn lane. ++ One through lane exists beyond 320 feet and provides storage capacity exceeding 1,000 feet.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 10

13.0 DISCUSSION OF INTERSECTION ANALYSES

13.1 Existing Conditions
The intersection analyses indicate that the study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour with a calculated 95th-percentile queue exceeding the storage capacity by 10 feet. Peak-hour traffic signal warrants are not satisfied.

13.2 Existing-Plus-Project Conditions
The existing-plus-Project conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project in the absence of other pending projects and regional growth.

This scenario isolates the specific effects of the Project.

The existing-plus-Project conditions analyses indicate that the all of the study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the existing condition, and the Project is likely to exacerbate the delays. The Project is also expected to cause the LOS to drop from D to E during the p.m. peak hour. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied.

Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

13.3 Near-Term With-Project Conditions
The near-term with-Project-conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project and cumulative projects. This scenario identifies a cumulative near-term condition for known projects.

The near-term conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target LOS:
• Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
• Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing.

The intersection of Smoot Avenue and Derrick Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the nearterm condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a low peak-hour factor. No improvements are Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 11
recommended, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours in the near-term condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

13.4 Year 2047 With-Project Conditions
The year 2047 With-Project conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target LOS:
• Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
• Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue
• Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions, with the following exception:
• Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33): calculated 95th-percentile queues in the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach exceed the storage capacity.

Smoot and Derrick Avenues
The intersection of Smoot Avenue and Derrick Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour and LOS E during the p.m. peak hour in the year 2047. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied.

The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a low peak-hour factor.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. Analysis sheets for improved conditions (both traffic signals and a roundabout) are presented in Appendix E and indicate that the intersection would operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of a future traffic signal at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process (ISOAP) should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 12
that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

Belmont and Derrick Avenues
At the intersection of Belmont and Derrick Avenues, the length of the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach should be extended to at least 225 feet by the year 2047.

Belmont and Amador Avenues
The intersection of Belmont and Amador Avenues (specifically the southbound-to-eastbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS D during the p.m. peak hour. A review of the peakhour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied.

The intersection is expected to operate at acceptable LOS in the future with widening to include a dedicated left-turn lane and a dedicated right-turn lane on the southbound approach, plus a dedicated right-turn lane on the westbound approach.

Belmont Avenue and Oller Street
The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours in the year 2047 condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour traffic signal warrants will be satisfied.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. Analysis sheets for improved conditions (both traffic signals and a roundabout) are presented in Appendix E and indicate that the intersection would operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of future traffic signals or a roundabout at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans ISOAP should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

14.0 EQUITABLE SHARE CALCULATIONS
Where required improvements for future conditions are not included in a traffic impact fee, the Project’s financial responsibility for the improvements can be determined based on equitable share calculations as presented in the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies dated December 2002. The 2002 Guide presents the following equation to determine a project’s equitable share of the cost of improvements:

TT EB
T
P
−
=
Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 13
where:

P = The equitable share of the project’s traffic impact; T = The project trips generated during the peak hour of the adjacent facility; TB = The forecasted (future with project) traffic volume on the impacted facility; TE = The existing traffic on the facility plus approved projects traffic (cumulative).

Table 10 presents equitable share responsibility calculations for the 2047 improvements based on p.m. peak hour trips. These fair shares would not be applicable if the improvement is included in, or added to, a transportation impact fee paid by the Project.

Table 10
Equitable Share Responsibility Calculations – P.M. Peak Hour Location Project
Trips
Existing
Traffic
2047
Traffic
Equitable
Share
Smoot / Derrick 31 817 1,210 7.9%
Belmont / Amador 126 151 998 14.9%
Belmont / Derrick 139 895 1,977 12.8%
Belmont / Oller 89 978 1,545 15.7%

15.0 CEQA TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSES
Senate Bill (SB) 743, signed in 2013 and codified in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines in January 2019, changes the way transportation impacts are analyzed in the CEQA process. Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) replaces automobile delay and level of service (LOS) as the metric for determination of a transportation impact. The Fresno Council of Governments (COG) prepared a document entitled Fresno County SB 743 Implementation Regional Guidelines dated June 2025 (hereinafter referred to as the COG Guidelines) to assist local agencies with VMT analyses. For residential projects, the COG Guidelines provides substantial evidence for the following statement: “Therefore, Fresno County member jurisdictions may establish a threshold for land use developments, specifically residential and office, of exceeding 13 percent below the existing regional VMT per capita as indicative of a significant environmental impact.” Per the COG Guidelines, the regional average is 17.63 VMT per capita and the significance threshold of 13 percent below

17.63 VMT per capita is 15.34 VMT per capita. Therefore, any project that generates more than 15.34 VMT per capita creates a significant transportation impact.

The COG travel model is the primary tool in Fresno County available to estimate VMT.

COG created an online VMT screening tool based on model output that identifies VMT per capita for specific locations. As of the date of this report, the screening tool is available at:
https://www.fresnocog.org/project/vmt-tool/. A print generated using the screening tool for traffic analysis zone (TAZ) 1701 immediately east of Amador Avenue (there is not applicable TAZ west of Amador Avenue) is included in Appendix F and indicates a project with 271 homes east of Amador Avenue would generate 10.3 VMT per capita. The Project site is actually located an average of half a mile west of TAZ 1701, so it is suggested that the actual Project VMT per capita is likely 10.8. This value is below the significance threshold of 15.34 VMT per capita. Therefore, it is suggested that the lead agency may presume that the Project will create a less-than-significant transportation impact.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 14

16.0 CONCLUSIONS
Generally-accepted traffic engineering principles and methods were employed to estimate the number of trips expected to be generated by the Project, to analyze the existing traffic conditions, and to analyze the traffic conditions projected to occur in the future.

The Project VMT per capita is estimated to be 10.8, which is below the significance threshold of 15.34 VMT per capita. Therefore, it is suggested that the lead agency may presume that the Project will create a less-than-significant transportation impact based on VMT.

The results of the operational analyses are summarized below for each analysis scenario.

16.1 Existing Conditions
The study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastboundto-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour with a calculated 95th -
percentile queue exceeding the storage capacity by 10 feet. Peak-hour traffic signal warrants are not satisfied.

16.2 Existing-Plus-Project Conditions
The existing-plus-Project conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project in the absence of other pending projects and regional growth.

This scenario isolates the specific effects of the Project.

The study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing, with the exception of the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180). The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastboundto-northbound left-turn) operates at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the existing condition, and the Project is likely to exacerbate the delays. The Project is also expected to cause the LOS to drop from D to E during the p.m. peak hour. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended to be constructed by the Project, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

16.3 Near-Term With-Project Conditions
The near-term with-Project-conditions analyses represent conditions that would occur after construction of the Project and cumulative projects. This scenario identifies a cumulative near-term condition for known projects.

The near-term conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target LOS:
• Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
• Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 15
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with no excessive queuing.

The intersection of Smoot Avenue and Derrick Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during the a.m. peak hour in the nearterm condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that peak-hour warrants for traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a low peak-hour factor. No improvements are recommended to be constructed by the Project, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

The intersection of Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (specifically the eastbound-tonorthbound left-turn) is expected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours in the near-term condition. A review of the peak-hour traffic volumes at the intersection suggests that warrants for all-way stop control and traffic signals are unlikely to be satisfied. Furthermore, there are numerous alternate routes available to motorists who regularly experience delays making the eastbound-to-northbound left-turn movement. Therefore, no improvements are recommended to be constructed by the Project, and it is suggested that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed.

16.4 Year 2047 With-Project Conditions
The year 2047 With-Project conditions analyses indicate that the following intersections are expected to operate worse that the target LOS:
• Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)
• Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue
• Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
The other study intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS with acceptable queuing conditions, with the following exception:
• Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33): calculated 95th-percentile queues in the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach exceed the storage capacity.

The excessive delays are associated with school traffic and a low peak-hour factor.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of a future traffic signal at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 16
The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process (ISOAP) should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

Belmont and Derrick Avenues
At the intersection of Belmont and Derrick Avenues, the length of the left-turn lane on the eastbound approach should be extended to at least 225 feet by the year 2047.

The intersection may require installation of traffic signals or a roundabout in the future if excessive delays or safety issues are realized. It is recommended that the intersection be monitored and studied as future developments occur to determine if and when improvements should be constructed. The Project may be responsible to pay an equitable share of future traffic signals or a roundabout at the intersection. The cost of a roundabout is expected to be substantially greater than signalization. It is suggested that, at this stage of planning, it is not reasonable to assume a roundabout as a basis for the equitable share.

The actual intersection control and lane configurations should be determined in the future, potentially in response to further development near the site, and at the time of the actual need. For State facilities, the Caltrans ISOAP should be implemented in accordance with the Intersection Safety and Operational Assessment Process Guide dated September 2024 (or the policies applicable at that time) to determine the specific intersection control and associated interchange configuration required.

Traffic Study – Proposed Residential Development June 8, 2026 Mendota, California Page 17
Thank you for the opportunity to perform these traffic analyses. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions.

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
John Rowland, PE, TE
Attachments: Figures 1 through 10
Appendix A - Scoping Letter and Agency Responses
Appendix B - Traffic Count Data Sheets
Appendix C - Fresno County Travel Model
Appendix D - Intersection Analysis Sheets
Appendix E - Improved Intersection Analysis Sheets
Appendix F – Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

FIGURES

TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX A

SCOPING LETTER AND AGENCY RESPONSES
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Scoping Letter
862 Pollasky Avenue ♦ Clovis, California 93612 ♦ (559) 299-1544 ♦ www.peters-engineering.com Mr. Michael Osborn October 8, 2025
City of Mendota City Engineer
c/o Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, Inc.
455 West Fir Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
Subject: Scope of Traffic Study
Proposed Residential Development
West of Amador Avenue
Mendota, California
Dear Mr. Osborn:

Peters Engineering Group has been retained to perform a traffic study for the subject project.

The purpose of this letter is to present information for the City of Mendota and other affected agencies to consider in finalizing the required scope of the traffic study, including approval of the trip generation calculations and determination of the intersections to be studied. The City may provide this letter to other affected agencies for review and comment, in particular the County of Fresno and Caltrans.

Project Description
The proposed single-family residential subdivision covers approximately 49.99 acres located west of the existing segment of Amador Avenue, extending roughly from north of Gonzalez Street to south of Silva Street. The Project proposes 271 single-family homes. Access to the site will be via three local streets connecting to Amador Avenue.

The Project site location is presented in the attached Figure 1, Site Vicinity Map, and the Project site plan is presented in the attached Figure 2, Site Plan.

Project Trip Generation
Data provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 12 th Edition, are typically used to estimate the number of trips anticipated to be generated by proposed projects. Table 1 presents the trip generation estimates for the Project.

Table 1
Project Weekday Trip Generation
Land Use Size Daily A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour
Rate Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Rate In:Out In Out Total Single-Family
Detached
Housing (210)
271 9.09 2,464 0.70 27:73 51 139 190 0.93 62:38 156 96 252 Reference: Trip Generation Manual, 12
th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, August 2025 Scope of Traffic Study - Proposed Residential Development October 8, 2025 Mendota, California Page 2
Project Trip Distribution and Assignment
The distribution of project trips presented was estimated based on results of previous traffic studies, available routes, the locations of complementary land uses, and engineering judgment.

The percentage distribution of Project traffic is presented in the attached Figure 3, Project Trip Distribution Percentages. The project traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4, Weekday A.M. and P.M. Peak Hour Project Traffic Volumes.

Study Area
Peters Engineering Group is requesting that the City of Mendota, Caltrans, and the County of Fresno indicate which, if any, intersections and road segments should be included in the study.

Based on a previous study for a similar near the Project site and the Project trip assignment, it is anticipated that the following intersections may require analysis:

1. Smoot Avenue and Sorenson Avenue

2. Smoot Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

3. Belmont Avenue and Amador Avenue Extension

4. Belmont Avenue and Derrick Avenue (SR 33)

5. Belmont Avenue and Oller Street (SR 180)
Study Scenarios
The following time periods will be studied:
• Weekday a.m. peak hour between 7:00 and 9:00 a.m.;
• Weekday p.m. peak hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.

It is anticipated that analyses will be required for at least the following scenarios:
• Existing Conditions;
• Existing-Plus-Project Conditions;
• Near-Term Conditions With Project (Includes Approved and Pending Projects); and • Long-Term (Year 2046) Conditions With Project.

Road segment analyses are not proposed because intersection operations typically govern unless the road segment is at least one to two miles long with no stop signs or signalized intersections.

Crash history, safety studies, and traffic signal warrants analyses are not proposed for this study.

Pending Projects
Peters Engineering Group requests that the City of Mendota provide information related to any pending and approved projects in the study area to be included in the near-term analyses.

Operational Conditions Analysis
Level of Service
The Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition, (HCM) defines level of service (LOS) as, “A quantitative stratification of a performance measure or measures that represent quality of service, measured on an A-F scale, with LOS A representing the best Scope of Traffic Study - Proposed Residential Development October 8, 2025 Mendota, California Page 3
operating conditions from the traveler’s perspective and LOS F the worst.” Automobile mode LOS characteristics for both unsignalized and signalized intersections are presented in Tables 3 and 4
Table 3
Level of Service Characteristics for Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)
A 0-10
B >10-15
C >15-25
D >25-35
E >35-50
F >50
Table 4
Level of Service Characteristics for Signalized Intersections Level of
Service Description Average Vehicle Delay (seconds)
A
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. <10 B
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is very short. >10-20
C
Volume-to-capacity ratio is no greater than 1.0. Progression is favorable or cycle length is moderate. >20-35
D
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is ineffective or cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.
>35-55
E
Volume-to-capacity ratio is high but no greater than 1.0. Progression is unfavorable and cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. >55-80 F
Volume-to-capacity ratio is greater than 1.0. Progression is very poor and cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. >80 Reference for Tables 3 and 4: Highway Capacity Manual, 7th Edition, Transportation Research Board, 2022 City of Mendota
Policy C-1.2 of the City of Mendota General Plan states that the City shall: “Seek to maintain operations on all roadways and intersections at Level of Service C or better at all times, including peak travel times, unless maintaining this Level of Service would, in the City's judgment, be infeasible and/or conflict with the achievement of other goals. Congestion in excess of Level of Service C may be accepted in these cases, provided that provisions are made to improve traffic flow and/or promote non-vehicular transportation as part of a development project or a City-initiated project.”
State Highways
Caltrans has historically endeavored to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D, but does not currently identify a specific LOS goal.

Scope of Traffic Study - Proposed Residential Development October 8, 2025 Mendota, California Page 4
Study Criteria
For purposes of this study, it is suggested that a traffic issue may require improvements if the proposed Project will decrease the LOS below C at an intersection, or if the Project will exacerbate conditions at an intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS D to LOS E).

For purposes of this study, a traffic issue will be recognized at State facilities if the analyses identify LOS E or F at an intersection. LOS E and F can be indicative of delays that may lead to safety concerns at unsignalized intersections. A traffic issue will also be identified if the Project will exacerbate conditions at an intersection already operating below the target LOS by increasing the average delay at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or more, or by causing the LOS to drop to a lesser LOS (e.g. drop from LOS E to LOS F).

Intersection Queuing Criteria
A queuing deficiency is identified in the existing condition if the calculated 95th-percentile queue length exceeds the storage length by more than 25 feet (the average storage length for one vehicle) since the bay taper can typically store one vehicle. A queuing issue is determined if the Project causes the calculated 95th-percentile queue length to exceed the existing or planned storage capacity of a lane by more than 25 feet. In storage lanes that are already deficient without the Project, a queuing issue is determined if the Project increases the calculated 95th-percentile queue length by at least 25 feet.

Closing
Peters Engineering Group is requesting that the affected agencies provide any comments on the content of this letter in writing. Specifically, we are requesting comment on, or confirmation of, the following items discussed above from all affected agencies before continuing with the analyses:
• Trip generation assumptions and calculations
• Study area intersections
• The time periods requiring intersection turning movement counts • The study scenarios
• Criteria for identifying traffic issues
• Pending and approved projects
• No Project-specific traffic modeling proposed or required.

Scope of Traffic Study - Proposed Residential Development October 8, 2025 Mendota, California Page 5
Thank you for the opportunity to work with you on this project. Please feel free to call our office if you have any questions.

PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP
John Rowland, PE, TE
Attachments: Figures 1 through 4

TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
City of Mendota Response
1 John Rowland
From: Michael Osborn <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2025 7:07 AM
To: Derek Sylvester; Jeff O'Neal
Cc: John Rowland; Alison Baker; Adrienne Burns
Subject: Re: Crown Mendota Project -
John & Y&H Team,
The Traffic Scoping letter is appropriate from the City's perspective. Please send to Caltrans and County for their input.

The City has one upcoming street project that would impact this development: the Amador & Smoot Street Extension which extends partial widths (two lanes in each direction) of Amador & Smoot from their current terminus to their intersection. This project is planned to be built in Spring 2026.

Sincerely,
Michael Osborn, PE, CASp, LEED-AP
Office: (559) 449-2700
Mobile: (805) 705-5222
From: Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2025 3:00 PM
To: Michael Osborn <[email protected]>; Jeff O'Neal <[email protected]> Cc: John Rowland <[email protected]>; Alison Baker <[email protected]>; Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Crown Mendota Project -

Good afternoon Michael and Jeff,

Following up here on the traffic scoping letter for the Crown project we sent over to you last week. Please let us know if you have any input on the proposed scope and if you will be forwarding to Caltrans and the County or would like us to.

Thank you,

Derek Sylvester
Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc.

O: (559) 244-3123 | M: (559) 360-5006
yandhengr.com

From: Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2025 8:16 AM
To: Michael Osborn <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff O'Neal <[email protected]>; Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>; John Rowland <johnrowland@petersengineering.com>; Alison Baker <[email protected]> Subject: Crown Mendota Project Traffic Scoping Letter
Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important
2 Good Morning Michael,

Hope all is well. We are submitting to you the Traffic Scoping Letter for the Crown project located on the west side of the city of Mendota. I have attached the conceptual map as well for reference. We would like to get your input on the scope of the proposed study. Also, we wanted to give you the option of distributing the letter further to Caltrans and the County. Please let us know if you would prefer that we distribute that out instead. Looking forward to your response.

Please note that we are looking to submit the Tentative Map in the coming week or two.

Thank you.

Adrienne Burns
Planning & Entitlements
______________________
2985 N. Burl Ave. Suite 101 Fresno, CA 93727
O: (559) 244-3123 | M: (559) 779-3971
yandhengr.com
“A committed team providing high quality engineering services for our clients and community.”

TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
County of Fresno Response
1 John Rowland
From: Luna, Hector <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2025 1:34 PM
To: John Rowland; Nakagawa, Wendy; Mtunga, Tawanda
Cc: Adrienne Burns; Derek Sylvester; Alison Baker; Michael Osborn; Jeff O'Neal Subject: RE: Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota Good afternoon,
The Transportation Planning Unit concurs with the study areas proposed in the scoping document.

Regards,
Hector E. Luna| Principal Planner
Department of Public Works and Planning |
Water and Natural Resources Division
2220 Tulare St. 6th Floor Fresno, CA 93721
Main Oice: (559) 600-4292 | Direct: (559) 600-9672
Email: [email protected]
Your input matters! Customer Service Survey
From: John Rowland <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2025 2:20 PM
To: Luna, Hector <[email protected]>; Nakagawa, Wendy <[email protected]>; Mtunga, Tawanda <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>; Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>; Alison Baker <[email protected]>; Michael Osborn <[email protected]>; Jeff O'Neal <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota Hello County staff,
Checking back to see if you plan to comment on the aached scoping leer. The City of Mendota is the lead agency.

Thanks,
John Rowland
(559) 299-1544 Ext. 112
From: John Rowland
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2025 5:23 PM
To: Padilla, Dave@DOT <[email protected]>; Jones, Keyomi L@DOT <[email protected]>; Luna, Hector <[email protected]>; Nakagawa, Wendy <[email protected]>; Mtunga, Tawanda <[email protected]>
Cc: Adrienne Burns <[email protected]>; Derek Sylvester <[email protected]>; Alison Baker <[email protected]>; Michael Osborn <[email protected]>; Jeff O'Neal <[email protected]> Subject: Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota
2 Hello County of Fresno and Caltrans staff,
Aached is a traffic study scoping leer for a residenal project proposed in Mendota. Please let us know if your agency has any comments on the leer. If you would be so kind as to reply to confirm receipt I would appreciate it. Also, if there is anyone else at your agency who should review the leer, would you please forward it to them? Finally, City consultants Michael Osborn and Jeff O’Neal are copied on this email, and I would request that you include them in your correspondence.

Thanks,
John Rowland, PE, TE
Peters Engineering Group
862 Pollasky Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
(559) 299-1544 Ext. 112
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Caltrans Response
“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.” DISTRICT 6 OFFICE
1352 WEST OLIVE AVENUE |P.O. BOX 12616 |FRESNO, CA 93778-2616 (559) 981-7284| FAX (559) 488-4195 | TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov
October 30, 2025
FRE-33-62.157
Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota
GTS #: https://ld-igr-gts.dot.ca.gov/district/6/report/38317#55777

SENT VIA EMAIL
Mr. Michael Osborn
City of Mendota City Engineer
c/o Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group, Inc.
455 West Fir Avenue
Clovis, California 93612
[email protected]
Dear Mr. Osborn:

Caltrans has completed the review of the Traffic Study Scope for Crown Homes, Mendota. The project proposes 271 single-family homes. Access to the site will be via three local streets connecting to Amador Avenue The proposed single-family residential subdivision covers approximately 49.99 acres.

The project site is located west of the existing segment of Amador Avenue, extending roughly from north of Gonzalez Street to south of Silva Street.

The mission of Caltrans is to provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment. The Local Development Review (LDR) process reviews land use projects and plans through the lenses of our mission and state planning priorities of infill, conservation, and travel‐efficient development. To ensure a safe and efficient transportation system, we encourage early consultation and coordination with local jurisdictions and project proponents on all development projects that utilize the multimodal transportation network.

Caltrans provides the following comments consistent with the State’s smart mobility goals that support a vibrant economy and sustainable communities:

1. On page two, within the Study Area section, one additional intersection should be included: SR 33 and SR 180 intersection (include AM/PM peak, 95th percentile queue lengths, storage vs demand, and possible spillback assessment.) Mr. Michael Osborn– Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota October 30, 2025

Page 2 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.”

2. Although the project does not directly front SR 33 and SR 180, it lies within one mile of a major state facility and will contribute to traffic using the SR 33 and SR 180 intersection. As such, it is recommended that frontage improvements (e.g., add storage, channelization, access control) be incorporated along the project’s local roadway interfaces to support safe and efficient access to the regional network.

3. According to the Caltrans Local Development Review Safety Practitioner’s Guidance dated February 2024, a safety review for a development is not required if the project makes no physical modification to the SHS and the project results in zero additional trips by any mode on the SHS. Since the proposed development is adding trips to the State Highway System (SHS), a safety review will be required.

The safety review should identify and analyze any potential safety impacts due to the increased conflicts. Perform 95th-percentile queuing at all study intersections, with a dedicated subsection for SHS locations (SR facilities). Report available storage (pocket + taper), deceleration lane length, compare to 95th-percentile queues, and assessing spillback potential. The developer should request Caltrans crash data summary for the involved SHS facility using the included Crash Data Request Form. Identify feasible safety countermeasures if warranted.

4. Please be advised. There is a Caltrans State Highway Operation and Protection Program (SHOPP) and Minor Program project planned for a Class II Bike Lane (Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure) at nearby SR 33/Belmont Avenue. The projects advertised for the year 2032/2033.

5. Alternative transportation policies should be applied to the development. An assessment of multi-modal facilities should be conducted to develop an integrated multi-modal transportation system to serve and help alleviate traffic congestion caused by the project and related development in this area of the city. The assessment should include the following:
a. Pedestrian walkways should link this Project to transit facilities, bicycle pathways and other walkways in the surrounding area.
b. Coordinating connections to local and regional bicycle pathways should be done to further encourage the use of bicycles for commuter and recreational purposes.
c. Transit service and bus stop accommodations should be extended to within ¼- mile of the Project site.

6. Caltrans recommends the Project implement “smart growth” principles regarding parking solutions, providing alternative transportation choices to residents and employees. Alternative transportation choices may include but are not limited to parking for carpools/vanpools, car-share and/or ride-share programs.

Mr. Michael Osborn– Traffic Study Scope - Crown Homes, Mendota October 30, 2025

Page 3 ends

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment.”

7. Based on Caltrans Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide, dated May 20, 2020, and effective as of July 1, 2020, Caltrans seeks to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips, provide a safe transportation system, reduce per capita VMT, increase accessibility to destinations via cycling, walking, carpooling, transit and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Caltrans recommends that the project proponent continue to work with the city to further implement improvements to reduce VMT and offer a variety of transportation modes for its employees.

If you have any other questions, please call or email: Keyomi Jones, Associate Transportation Planner at (559) 981-7284 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
Mr. Dave Padilla, Branch Chief,
Local Development Review Branch
Cc: John Rowland, PE, TE Peters Engineering Group [email protected] TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX B

TRAFFIC COUNT DATA SHEETS
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 7 1 1 4 43 39 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 35 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 22 1 4 11 47 38 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 55 8 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 27 1 2 15 82 119 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 77 9 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 5 0 48 6 1 14 126 97 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 112 5 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 2 0 41 3 2 7 91 70 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 129 6 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 25 5 4 5 57 28 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 47 2 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 18 2 0 5 48 28 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 55 4 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 20 2 2 11 64 39 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 50 7 TOTAL 7 0 208 21 16 72 558 458 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 0 560 44 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 76 9 6 18 103 68 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 108 1 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 66 7 2 14 104 76 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 124 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 64 6 4 21 111 65 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 105 5 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 45 5 1 16 104 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 107 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 57 5 3 17 106 84 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 117 3 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 53 6 6 13 104 85 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 108 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 45 2 4 14 102 62 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 121 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 54 4 3 12 110 70 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 104 0 TOTAL 0 0 460 44 29 125 844 581 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 0 894 11 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 7 0 138 11 9 47 346 324 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 373 28 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 232 23 10 68 425 296 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 453 9 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.756 5.4% PM 0 296 425 68 0.953
PM 0.962 2.1% AM 0 324 346 47 0.756
PHF ##### #####
AM PM
0 0 373 453
0 0 0 0
0 0 58 15
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.753 0.929 PHF

0.661 7 0 138 11 AM

0.873 0 0 232 23 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Oller St
Northbound Westbound
Derrick Ave
Derrick Ave
Turning Movement Report
Oller St @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7605
-120.3863
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 5 PM 0 0 0 1
PM Peak Total 0 2 AM 0 0 0 1 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
4 0 0 0 AM
1 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Oller St @ Derrick Ave 36.7605
Fresno -120.3863
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Derrick Ave
0 Oller St
Derrick Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
Oller St /
Clear
Roundabout
COMMENTS NE Leg is incomplete.

Page 3 of 3 ends

N/A
Turning Movement Report
Oller St @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Derrick Ave / Derrick Ave
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 1 1 1 1 0 3 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 6 6 3 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 12 3 0 2 0 0 3 0 2 0 1 5 6 3 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 1 8 4 0 0 47 12 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 9 10 3 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 1 12 6 0 0 73 18 6 10 0 2 4 2 0 0 7 6 41 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 6 5 0 0 13 5 4 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 8 12 60 3 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 1 4 0 0 0 5 3 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 8 13 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 1 5 3 1 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 2 5 12 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 1 6 0 0 0 8 3 2 0 0 2 3 3 1 0 1 5 10 1 TOTAL 0 5 40 16 1 1 166 50 16 16 0 11 18 8 4 0 28 56 158 14 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 1 6 1 0 0 18 7 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 1 26 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 4 1 0 0 10 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 37 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 8 4 0 0 18 6 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 5 29 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 1 4 0 0 0 20 8 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 3 7 33 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 5 3 1 0 21 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 3 35 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 7 3 0 0 19 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 36 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 6 3 0 0 23 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 39 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 6 0 0 0 14 10 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 3 21 0 TOTAL 0 2 46 15 1 0 143 61 2 2 0 5 11 1 0 0 19 26 256 0 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 3 30 15 0 0 138 38 12 14 0 6 10 4 0 0 24 35 124 7 4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 1 22 9 1 0 83 30 1 1 0 2 5 1 0 0 9 14 143 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.615 4.8% PM 1 30 83 0 0.95
PM 0.949 0.6% AM 12 38 138 0 0.485
PHF 0.667 0.625
AM PM
0 0 124 143
2 6 35 14
5 10 24 9
1 4 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.572 0.922 PHF

0.618 0 3 30 15 AM

0.775 0 0 22 9 PM
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Sorensen Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7553
-120.3890

Page 1 of 3 ends

Smoot Ave
Northbound Westbound
Smoot Ave
Sorensen Ave
Sorensen Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 10
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 2
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 4
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 3
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
TOTAL 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 24
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 2
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 8
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 9
4:45 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 1 5
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 72 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 1 17 AM 0 0 0 8 Peds <>
5 9
AM PM
0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
30 7
Peds <>
25 0 0 0 AM
3 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Sorensen Ave
Smoot Ave Smoot Ave
Sorensen Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Sorensen Ave 36.7553
Fresno -120.3890
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Sorensen Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Sorensen Ave / Sorensen Ave
Smoot Ave / Smoot Ave
Clear
All-way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 12 14 0 3 0 0 41 0 4 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 8 26 0 3 0 0 32 3 5 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 17 37 0 5 0 0 103 8 4 0 8 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 40 65 0 2 0 0 113 13 6 0 10 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 70 48 0 5 0 0 70 7 2 0 6 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 19 31 0 3 0 0 34 4 5 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 15 24 0 0 0 0 26 3 1 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 12 24 0 3 0 0 41 2 3 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 193 269 0 24 0 0 460 40 30 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 22 77 0 6 0 0 88 8 2 0 5 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 35 68 0 2 0 0 78 6 3 0 2 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 34 71 0 4 0 0 70 5 3 0 4 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 32 57 0 2 0 0 73 10 1 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 39 75 0 2 0 0 80 2 1 0 3 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 32 61 0 5 0 0 79 4 1 0 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 39 52 0 2 0 0 62 10 1 0 4 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 21 59 0 2 0 0 65 3 4 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 254 520 0 25 0 0 595 48 16 0 23 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 146 181 0 15 0 0 320 32 17 0 28 0 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 140 271 0 10 0 0 301 23 8 0 9 0 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.734 4.7% PM 23 301 0 0 0.964
PM 0.933 2.2% AM 32 320 0 0 0.698
PHF 0.891 0.5
AM PM
0 0 0 0
9 28 0 0
0 0 0 0
73 111 0 0
PM AM
PHF
##### ##### PHF

0.693 0 146 181 0 AM

0.901 0 140 271 0 PM
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound

Page 1 of 3 ends

Northbound Westbound
Smoot Ave
Derrick Ave
Derrick Ave
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7553
-120.3867
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 34
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 32
4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 1 35 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 0 4 AM 0 0 0 2 Peds <>
2 32
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
1 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Derrick Ave 36.7553
Fresno -120.3867
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Derrick Ave
Smoot Ave 0
Derrick Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME CONTROL TYPE
/ Smoot Ave
Clear
One-way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

N/A
Turning Movement Report
Smoot Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Derrick Ave / Derrick Ave
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 4 0 0 13 2 1 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 2 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 9 4 4 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 0 1 0 0 3 15 0 4 0 0 5 10 2 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 10 13 3 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 6 1 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 10 1 6 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 8 2 2 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 0 6 0 0 3 61 0 11 0 0 74 38 20
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 3 0 0 2 24 0 0 0 0 11 23 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 2 23 0 2 0 0 10 21 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 2 0 0 1 19 0 2 0 0 9 12 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 3 27 0 4 0 0 14 15 1 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 3 15 0 0 0 0 6 11 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 7 13 0 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 1 17 0 1 0 0 13 19 0 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 23 0 1 0 0 8 11 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 7 0 0 13 162 0 10 0 0 78 125 2
PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 91 0 4 0 0 3 39 0 5 0 0 35 27 10 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 6 0 0 8 93 0 8 0 0 44 71 2 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.541 7.5% PM 6 0 50 0 0.875
PM 0.895 3.7% AM 4 0 91 0 0.403
PHF 0.842 0.583
AM PM
0 0 27 71
8 3 35 44
93 39 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.674 0.846 PHF
##### 0 0 0 0 AM
##### 0 0 0 0 PM
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Peach Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7493
-120.3896

Page 1 of 3 ends

Belmont Ave
Northbound Westbound
Belmont Ave
Peach Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 0 PM 0 0 0 2
PM Peak Total 0 2 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Peach Ave
Belmont Ave Belmont Ave
0

Page 2 of 3 ends

Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Peach Ave 36.7493
Fresno -120.3896
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Peach Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Peach Ave /
Belmont Ave / Belmont Ave
Clear
One-way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 9 2 3 0 17 12 7 3 0 3 8 1 5 0 1 10 18 4 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 1 9 1 2 0 18 13 5 1 0 2 6 3 0 0 2 7 8 1 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 6 0 2 0 76 9 5 4 0 5 28 0 1 0 3 13 40 8 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 1 9 10 0 0 121 8 5 4 0 10 62 3 3 0 0 12 46 4 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 1 4 2 0 0 28 22 6 4 0 2 9 1 0 0 5 19 49 8 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 3 9 2 3 0 10 12 4 4 0 2 3 0 0 0 2 8 15 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 1 9 0 0 0 11 10 4 1 0 4 6 0 2 0 6 9 11 7 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 1 8 2 1 0 16 8 4 3 0 6 4 2 1 0 2 6 24 3 TOTAL 0 8 63 19 11 0 297 94 40 24 0 34 126 10 12 0 21 84 211 35 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 4 57 23 8 0 44 17 15 3 0 19 25 2 0 0 6 25 32 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 4 32 20 3 0 30 19 11 3 0 20 22 2 2 0 3 20 29 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 30 9 4 0 35 14 10 3 0 17 25 4 2 0 5 17 42 3 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 1 35 13 1 0 41 15 16 1 0 15 25 1 3 0 5 16 23 4 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 26 10 4 0 20 18 5 1 0 24 17 1 2 0 14 14 20 1 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 5 31 4 4 0 36 19 2 1 0 8 12 3 0 0 6 7 11 2 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 1 18 14 9 0 31 15 11 1 0 18 16 1 0 0 6 11 22 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 2 25 5 3 0 23 13 11 2 0 13 13 0 3 0 2 6 11 0 TOTAL 0 17 254 98 36 0 260 130 81 15 0 134 155 14 12 0 47 116 190 11 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 3 28 13 4 0 243 52 21 13 0 19 105 7 4 0 10 51 143 21 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 9 154 65 16 0 150 65 52 10 0 71 97 9 7 0 19 78 126 7 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.605 6.0% PM 52 65 150 0 0.878
PM 0.832 4.5% AM 21 52 243 0 0.59
PHF 0.962 0.437
AM PM
0 0 143 126
71 19 51 78
97 105 10 19
9 7 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.699 0.871 PHF

0.55 0 3 28 13 AM

0.679 0 9 154 65 PM
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7493
-120.3868

Page 1 of 3 ends

Belmont Ave
Northbound Westbound
Belmont Ave
Derrick Ave
Derrick Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
TOTAL 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 1 8 PM 0 0 0 21
PM Peak Total 0 29 AM 0 0 0 2 Peds <>
0 3
AM PM
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
0 8
Peds <>
3 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Derrick Ave
Belmont Ave Belmont Ave
Derrick Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Derrick Ave 36.7493
Fresno -120.3868
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
CYCLE TIME 110 Seconds CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ Derrick Ave
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Derrick Ave / Derrick Ave
Belmont Ave / Belmont Ave
Clear
Signal
COMMENTS All approaches have protected left turns.

Page 3 of 3 ends

Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 26 32 0 4 0 0 49 1 4 0 6 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 27 51 0 10 0 1 46 7 5 0 6 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 35 68 0 12 0 0 45 29 6 0 13 1 15 3 0 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 68 70 2 10 0 1 44 57 3 0 32 0 17 1 0 0 1 0 0 8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 23 30 0 5 1 3 61 14 5 0 36 0 20 2 0 0 0 0 0 8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 11 33 0 4 0 0 46 5 6 0 2 1 16 1 0 1 0 0 0 8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 13 35 0 9 0 0 35 3 3 0 5 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 14 39 0 6 0 0 42 2 5 0 2 1 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 TOTAL 0 217 358 2 60 1 5 368 118 37 0 102 3 112 13 0 1 1 1 1 Time U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 25 80 0 1 0 1 56 12 5 0 27 0 40 3 0 0 0 0 0 4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 31 93 1 5 0 0 67 14 3 0 17 0 22 1 0 0 0 1 0 4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 31 85 1 7 0 1 78 11 4 0 15 0 38 3 0 1 0 1 1 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 21 89 0 5 0 1 59 9 1 0 9 0 37 5 0 0 1 2 2 5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 16 64 0 3 0 1 58 10 2 0 16 0 34 2 0 0 0 1 0 5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 25 71 0 1 0 1 48 7 2 0 10 0 21 0 0 0 0 1 1 5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 21 56 0 0 0 0 55 12 1 0 18 0 27 5 0 0 1 4 1 5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 18 51 0 0 0 0 41 6 3 0 17 1 18 4 0 1 0 2 0 TOTAL 0 188 589 2 22 0 5 462 81 21 0 129 1 237 23 0 2 2 12 5 PEAK HOUR U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks U-Turn Left Thru Right Trucks 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 153 219 2 37 1 5 196 107 19 0 87 1 65 7 0 0 1 0 0 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 108 347 2 18 0 3 260 46 13 0 68 0 137 12 0 1 1 4 3 PHF Trucks PHF
AM 0.717 7.5% PM 46 260 3 0 0.858
PM 0.932 4.7% AM 107 196 5 1 0.757
PHF 0.765 0.683
AM PM
0 0 0 4
68 87 1 1
0 1 0 1
137 65 0 0
PM AM
PHF

0.25 0.5 PHF

0.668 0 153 219 2 AM

0.914 0 108 347 2 PM
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ SR 180
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear

36.7493
-120.3733

Page 1 of 3 ends

Driveway
Northbound Westbound
Belmont Ave
Oller St
San Benito Ave
Southbound
Southbound Eastbound
Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION LATITUDE

COUNTY LONGITUDE

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:00 AM - 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM - 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM - 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM - 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM - 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM - 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM - 9:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0
Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 4:00 PM - 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM - 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM - 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM - 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM - 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM - 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
PEAK HOUR Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 7:15 AM - 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
4:00 PM - 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bikes Peds Peds <>
AM Peak Total 0 10 PM 0 0 0 0
PM Peak Total 0 0 AM 0 0 0 0 Peds <>
0 0
AM PM
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
PM AM
Peds <>
10 0
Peds <>
0 0 0 0 AM
0 0 0 0 PM
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Oller St
Belmont Ave Driveway
San Benito Ave Page 2 of 3
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Westbound Bikes W.Leg
Peds
Northbound Bikes N.Leg
Peds
Southbound Bikes S.Leg
Peds
Eastbound Bikes E.Leg
Peds
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ SR 180 36.7493
Fresno -120.3733
Thursday, December 11, 2025 Clear
Metro Traffic Data Inc.
310 N. Irwin Street - Suite 20
Hanford, CA 93230 Prepared For:

Peters Engineering Group
800-975-6938 Phone/Fax 862 Pollasky Ave
www.metrotrafficdata.com Clovis, CA 93612

LOCATION N/S STREET

COUNTY E/W STREET

COLLECTION DATE WEATHER

CYCLE TIME N/A CONTROL TYPE
Turning Movement Report
Belmont Ave @ SR 180
Fresno
Thursday, December 11, 2025
Oller St / San Benito Ave
Driveway / Belmont Ave
Clear
One-way Stop

COMMENTS

Page 3 of 3 ends

TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX C

FRESNO COUNTY TRAVEL MODEL
Licensed to Peters Engineering
AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
2024 Fresno County Travel Model
310
64 106
249
184
156
122
169
3 7
5 2
8 8
51 14
3 4
0 8
1 3
8 6
1 2
4 3
212
35 7
1 2
71 4
4 0
9 48
39 94
111
118
86 102
188
173
136
28 51
50 47
7 24
21 14
103
19 42
101 2
3 6
4 84
116
165
130
4 1
1 3
81 164
173
119
0 0
0 0
9 12
15 15
8 19
23 14
0 0
0 0
191
43 70
159
19 0
0 0
0 5
3 7
51 80
51 438
350
80 SR 33
SR 33 70
345
301
103
87 96
78 639
245
205
SR 33
SR 33
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
29 312
250
323
354
SR 180
SR 180
299
332
432
345
299
332
432
345
312
250
323
35 62
4 189
249
96 9TH
9TH
389
417
486
440
SR 180
SR 180
38 41
4 7
44 S
0 SR 180
367
127
349
728
593
464
728
349
464
593
71 370
318
99 Belmont
Belmont
70 345
301
103
51 438
350
80 SR 33
SR 33
51 438
350
80 87
96 87
170
167
96 87
170
167
96 Belmont
Belmont
78 000
0 S
moot
S
moot
78 639
245
205
29 545
127
166
SR 33
SR 33
361
349
336
593
0 0
0 0
2ND
2ND
361
349
336
593
284
359
322
542
88 178
178
100
88 178
178
100
284
359
322
542
101
60 317
10 7TH
7TH
284
359
322
542
312
250
323
354
62 96
62 96
347
409
431
380
SR 33
SR 33
0 0
0 0
S
moot
S
moot
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
154
172
440
82 7TH
7TH
87 170
167
96 Belmont
Belmont
389
418
486
440
SR 180
SR 180
101
60 317
10 7TH
7TH
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
7 24
21 14
Marie
Marie
7 24
21 14
Marie
Marie
62 189
249
96 9TH
9TH
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
62 96
18 52
113
29 18
52 113
29 Airport
Airport
55 20
32 119
Inez
Inez
55 20
32 0
0 0
0 Marie
Marie
75 517
340
159
Bass
Bass
24 7
14 21
7 24
21 14
Marie
Marie
24 7
14 21
68 472
300
138
Bass
Bass
24 7
14 21
23 7
13 20
2ND
2ND
24 76
57 23
7 13
20 18
160
59 46
Inez
Inez
18 59
46 55
20 32
119
Inez
Inez
55 20
32 119
Inez
Inez
55 2
3 0
2 55
2 3
0 2
119
71 370
318
99 0
0 0
0 Belmont
Belmont
71 370318
99 BelmontBelmont
0 0
0 0
Amador
Amador
Licensed to Peters Engineering
AM and PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
2046 Fresno County Travel Model
402
72 142
334
180
142
146
188
3 6
3 2
6 4
3 5
0 15
7 21
13 17
39 26
155
132
45 55
12 2
4 8
1 4
7 1
6 74
54 94
109
140
92 108
223
206
153
33 48
52 50
11 39
37 17
82 18
31 69 2
4 11
3 91
134
172
125
3 1
2 3
91 170
182
124
0 0
0 0
8 10
10 12
6 18
23 17
0 0
0 0
206
41 71
176
19 0
0 0
0 6
3 6
49 83
49 437
369
83 SR 33
SR 33
99 71
350
301
117
94 74
593
287
221
SR 33
SR 33
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
28 416
277
369
436
SR 180
SR 180
441
362
430
480
441
362
430
480
416
277
369
43 46
6 150
131
68 9TH
9TH
498
430
518
541
SR 180
SR 180
49 43
5 0
54 S
1 SR 180
303
129
315
547
398
425
547
315
425
398
70 375
317
113
Belmont
Belmont
71 350
301
117
49 437
369
83 SR 33
SR 33
49 437
369
83 94 94
155
160
119
94 155
160
119
Belmont
Belmont
74 000
0 S
moot
S
moot
74 593
287
221
28 495
144
168
SR 33
SR 33
608
391
428
839
95 384
462
152
2ND
2ND
608
391
428
839
481
379
391
749
92 163
167
123
92 163
167
123
481
379
391
749
98 121
331
23 7TH
7TH
481
379
391
749
416
277
369
436
46 68
46 68
382
420
458
427
SR 33
SR 33
0 0
0 0
S
moot
S
moot
0 0
0 0
S
moot
S
moot
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
156
243
460
97 7TH
7TH
94 155
160
119
Belmont
Belmont
498
430
518
541
SR 180
SR 180
98 121
331
23 7TH
7TH
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
11 39
37 17
Marie
Marie
11 39
37 17
Marie
Marie
46 150
131
68 9TH
9TH
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
46 68
8 3
1 6
1 8
3 1
6 1
Airport
Airport
12 6
9 21
Inez
Inez
12 6
9 21
0 0
0 0
Marie
Marie
17 287
80 75
Bass
Bass
95 384
462
152
2ND
2ND
90 11
39 37
17 Marie
Marie
90 16
261
79 67
Bass
Bass
90 5
1 5
77 265
85 2ND
2ND
55 85
14 51
37 36
Inez
Inez
14 51
37 36
12 6
9 21
Inez
Inez
12 6
9 21
Inez
Inez
12 6
9 21
12 6
9 21
70 375
317
113
0 0
1 1
Belmont
Belmont
70 375317113
BelmontBelmont
0 0
0 0
Amador
Amador
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX D

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEETS
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Operational Analyses

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:57:18 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 568 5.0 1012 0.562 100 7.0 LOS A 4.5 116.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 568 5.0 0.562 7.0 LOS A 4.5 116.3
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 4 5.0 557 0.007 100 8.8 LOS A 0.0 1.1 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.007 8.8 LOS A 0.0 1.1
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 945 5.0 1305 0.724 100 5.5 LOS A 9.0 234.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 945 5.0 0.724 5.5 LOS A 9.0 234.8
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 207 5.0 754 0.274 100 13.0 LOS B 1.7 43.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 207 5.0 0.274 13.0 LOS B 1.7 43.0
Intersection 1724 5.0 0.724 6.9 LOS A 9.0 234.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. d Dominant lane on roundabout approach
Approach Lane Flows (veh/h)
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 76 491 1 568 5.0 1012 0.562 100 NA NA
Approach 76 491 1 568 5.0 0.562
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 4 5.0 557 0.007 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.007
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 62 1 455 426 945 5.0 1305 0.724 100 NA NA
Approach 62 1 455 426 945 5.0 0.724
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 754 0.274 100 NA NA
Approach 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 0.274
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1724 5.0 0.724
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:14 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing-AM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.5
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 10 4 24 35 124 3 30 15 138 38 12
Future Vol, veh/h 6 10 4 24 35 124 3 30 15 138 38 12
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 8 13 5 32 47 165 4 40 20 184 51 16
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.2 9.3 8.2 10.2

HCM LOSA A A B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 6% 30% 13% 73%
Vol Thru, % 63% 50% 19% 20%
Vol Right, % 31% 20% 68% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 48 20 183 188
LT Vol 3 6 24 138
Through Vol 30 10 35 38
RT Vol 15 4 124 12
Lane Flow Rate 64 27 244 251
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.084 0.037 0.299 0.333
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.738 4.985 4.407 4.788
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 753 715 815 749
Service Time 2.79 3.035 2.439 2.829
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.085 0.038 0.299 0.335
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.2 8.2 9.3 10.2
HCM Lane LOS AAAB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.1 1.3 1.5
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.7
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 111 146 181 320 32
Future Vol, veh/h 28 111 146 181 320 32
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 35 35 35 0 0 35
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 37 148 195 241 427 43
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1127 497 504 0 - 0
Stage 1 462 -----
Stage 2 666 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 223 567 1045 - - -
Stage 1 628 -----
Stage 2 505 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 168 530 1010 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 168 -----
Stage 1 490 -----
Stage 2 489 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.02 4.2 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1010 - 168 530 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.193 - 0.222 0.279 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.4 - 32.4 14.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 0.8 1.1 - -
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-AM
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 19 105 7 10 51 143 3 28 13 243 52 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 19 105 7 10 51 143 3 28 13 243 52 21 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 27 150 9 14 73 161 4 40 13 347 74 10 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 55 677 40 31 330 285 9 257 203 435 704 583
Arrive On Green 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.14 0.14 0.25 0.39 0.39 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 3288 195 1725 1721 1484 1725 1811 1432 1725 1811 1500 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 27 78 81 14 73 161 4 40 13 347 74 10 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1763 1725 1721 1484 1725 1811 1432 1725 1811 1500 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 1.8 1.8 0.4 1.7 4.6 0.1 0.9 0.4 8.8 1.2 0.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 1.8 1.8 0.4 1.7 4.6 0.1 0.9 0.4 8.8 1.2 0.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 55 354 363 31 330 285 9 257 203 435 704 583 V/C Ratio(X) 0.49 0.22 0.22 0.46 0.22 0.56 0.43 0.16 0.06 0.80 0.11 0.02 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 296 780 799 259 743 641 259 860 680 1556 2222 1841 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.2 15.4 15.4 22.6 15.9 17.0 23.1 17.5 17.3 16.3 9.1 8.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.8 0.3 0.3 10.2 0.3 1.8 28.1 0.3 0.1 3.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.2 0.6 1.5 0.1 0.4 0.1 3.4 0.4 0.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 28.9 15.7 15.7 32.9 16.2 18.8 51.2 17.8 17.4 19.7 9.1 8.8 LnGrp LOS CBBCBBDBBBAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 186 248 57 431
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.6 18.8 20.1 17.6
Approach LOS B B C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.7 11.5 4.8 14.5 4.3 23.0 5.5 13.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 42.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 7.0 57.1 8.0 20.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.8 2.9 2.4 3.8 2.1 3.2 2.7 6.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.1
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-AM
Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 160 14 277 4 40 19 347 74 30
v/c Ratio 0.12 0.23 0.06 0.42 0.02 0.16 0.06 0.63 0.08 0.04 Control Delay (s/veh) 26.5 19.6 26.9 10.2 27.3 25.7 0.3 21.2 9.3 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 26.5 19.6 26.9 10.2 27.3 25.7 0.3 21.2 9.3 0.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 6 19 3 8 1 10 0 71 7 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 46 18 27 8 34 0 149 35 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1243 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 292 1523 255 1387 255 848 752 1435 1696 1401 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.11 0.05 0.20 0.02 0.05 0.03 0.24 0.04 0.02 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 14.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 87 1 65 1 1 1 153 219 2 5 196 107
Future Vol, veh/h 87 1 65 1 1 1 153 219 2 5 196 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 121 1 90 1 1 1 213 304 3 7 272 149
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1110 1112 367 1037 1185 326 431 0 0 317 0 0 Stage 1 370 370 - 741 741 -------
Stage 2 740 742 - 297 445 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 182 203 666 204 184 702 1097 - - 1210 - - Stage 1 638 609 - 399 414 -------
Stage 2 399 414 - 699 565 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 134 151 653 130 137 689 1087 - - 1198 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 134 151 - 130 137 -------
Stage 1 627 599 - 302 314 -------
Stage 2 300 313 - 591 555 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 71.51 25.22 3.73 0.13

HCM LOS F D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 735 - - 134 151 653 182 27 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 - - 0.903 0.009 0.138 0.023 0.006 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.1 0 - 116.9 29 11.4 25.2 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - F D B D A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 6 0 0.5 0.1 0 - -

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:58:16 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 489 2.0 981 0.498 100 6.4 LOS A 3.6 91.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 489 2.0 0.498 6.4 LOS A 3.6 91.0
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 3 2.0 624 0.005 100 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.005 8.1 LOS A 0.0 0.7
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 823 2.0 1563 0.527 100 4.7 LOS A 4.9 125.5 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 823 2.0 0.527 4.7 LOS A 4.9 125.5
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 268 2.0 849 0.315 100 12.6 LOS B 1.8 46.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 268 2.0 0.315 12.6 LOS B 1.8 46.2
Intersection 1582 2.0 0.527 6.6 LOS A 4.9 125.5
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 16 472 1 489 2.0 981 0.498 100 NA NA
Approach 16 472 1 489 2.0 0.498
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 3 2.0 624 0.005 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.005
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 71 1 443 308 823 2.0 1563 0.527 100 NA NA
Approach 71 1 443 308 823 2.0 0.527
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 849 0.315 100 NA NA
Approach 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 0.315
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1582 2.0 0.527
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:17 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing-PM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 5 1 9 14 143 1 22 9 83 30 1
Future Vol, veh/h 2 5 1 9 14 143 1 22 9 83 30 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 2 5 1 9 15 151 1 23 9 87 32 1
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 7.6 7.7 7.5 8.3

HCM LOSA A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 25% 5% 73%
Vol Thru, % 69% 63% 8% 26%
Vol Right, % 28% 13% 86% 1%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 32 8 166 114
LT Vol 1 2 9 83
Through Vol 22 5 14 30
RT Vol 9 1 143 1
Lane Flow Rate 34 8 175 120
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.041 0.011 0.187 0.149
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.346 4.494 3.853 4.47
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 829 800 937 793
Service Time 2.346 2.501 1.856 2.551
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.01 0.187 0.151
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 7.5 7.6 7.7 8.3
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0 0.7 0.5
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 73 140 271 301 23
Future Vol, veh/h 9 73 140 271 301 23
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 4 4 0 0 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 10 78 151 291 324 25
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 924 332 352 0 - 0
Stage 1 328 -----
Stage 2 596 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 295 703 1190 - - -
Stage 1 724 -----
Stage 2 544 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 256 698 1185 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 256 -----
Stage 1 629 -----
Stage 2 542 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 11.78 2.89 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1185 - 256 698 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.127 - 0.038 0.112 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.5 - 19.6 10.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.1 0.4 - -
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-PM
HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 97 9 19 78 126 9 154 65 150 65 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 71 97 9 19 78 126 9 154 65 150 65 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 117 10 23 94 122 11 186 62 181 78 51 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 121 806 68 47 362 304 24 405 312 238 630 512 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 3187 268 1725 1721 1447 1725 1811 1395 1725 1811 1474 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 62 65 23 94 122 11 186 62 181 78 51 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1734 1725 1721 1447 1725 1811 1395 1725 1811 1474 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.4 1.4 1.4 0.7 2.3 3.6 0.3 4.4 1.8 5.0 1.5 1.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.4 1.4 1.4 0.7 2.3 3.6 0.3 4.4 1.8 5.0 1.5 1.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 121 435 439 47 362 304 24 405 312 238 630 512 V/C Ratio(X) 0.71 0.14 0.15 0.49 0.26 0.40 0.45 0.46 0.20 0.76 0.12 0.10 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 555 1007 1015 277 730 614 243 1023 788 937 1752 1426 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.6 14.4 14.4 23.8 16.4 16.9 24.3 16.7 15.7 20.6 11.1 11.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.1 0.2 7.6 0.4 0.9 12.4 0.8 0.3 4.9 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.2 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.1 0.2 1.7 0.5 2.2 0.5 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 30.2 14.5 14.6 31.4 16.8 17.8 36.7 17.5 16.0 25.5 11.1 11.0 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B D B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 213 239 259 310
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.9 18.7 18.0 19.5
Approach LOS C B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.9 16.0 5.4 17.5 4.7 22.2 7.5 15.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 28.1 8.0 29.1 7.0 48.1 16.0 21.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 6.4 2.7 3.4 2.3 3.5 4.4 5.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 1.2 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.1 1.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.2
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing-PM
Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 128 23 246 11 186 78 181 78 63 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.15 0.12 0.45 0.06 0.49 0.18 0.50 0.09 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 29.6 20.0 30.8 14.5 31.0 28.0 1.0 28.2 12.0 0.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 29.6 20.0 30.8 14.5 31.0 28.0 1.0 28.2 12.0 0.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 14 8 16 4 60 0 59 14 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 77 46 32 50 20 134 0 131 50 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 1243 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 512 1825 256 1264 223 946 797 864 1468 1190 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.17 0.07 0.09 0.19 0.05 0.20 0.10 0.21 0.05 0.05 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46
Future Vol, veh/h 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 73 1 147 1 1 4 116 373 2 3 280 49
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 937 938 324 913 962 394 339 0 0 385 0 0 Stage 1 321 321 - 616 616 -------
Stage 2 616 618 - 297 345 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 239 258 703 248 250 642 1187 - - 1141 - - Stage 1 678 641 - 468 472 -------
Stage 2 468 472 - 699 625 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 202 221 690 166 214 630 1176 - - 1130 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 202 221 - 166 214 -------
Stage 1 670 633 - 405 409 -------
Stage 2 402 409 - 542 617 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.59 15.42 1.98 0.08

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 425 - - 202 221 690 352 17 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.099 - - 0.362 0.005 0.214 0.018 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.4 0 - 32.6 21.4 11.6 15.4 8.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - D C B C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 1.6 0 0.8 0.1 0 - -

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:58:46 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 575 5.0 964 0.597 100 8.1 LOS A 5.3 136.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 575 5.0 0.597 8.1 LOS A 5.3 136.6
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 4 5.0 519 0.008 100 9.5 LOS A 0.0 1.2 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.008 9.5 LOS A 0.0 1.2
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 1026 5.0 1310 0.783 100 6.0 LOS A 11.5 298.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1026 5.0 0.783 6.0 LOS A 11.5 298.3
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 207 5.0 692 0.299 100 13.6 LOS B 1.9 49.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 207 5.0 0.299 13.6 LOS B 1.9 49.0
Intersection 1812 5.0 0.783 7.5 LOS A 11.5 298.3
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 76 497 1 575 5.0 964 0.597 100 NA NA
Approach 76 497 1 575 5.0 0.597
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 4 5.0 519 0.008 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.008
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 108 1 474 443 1026 5.0 1310 0.783 100 NA NA
Approach 108 1 474 443 1026 5.0 0.783
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 692 0.299 100 NA NA
Approach 9 182 1 14 207 5.0 0.299
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1812 5.0 0.783
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:15 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 17 4 24 38 129 3 30 15 152 38 12
Future Vol, veh/h 6 17 4 24 38 129 3 30 15 152 38 12
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 8 23 5 32 51 172 4 40 20 203 51 16
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.4 9.6 8.3 10.7

HCM LOSA A A B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 6% 22% 13% 75%
Vol Thru, % 63% 63% 20% 19%
Vol Right, % 31% 15% 68% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 48 27 191 202
LT Vol 3 6 24 152
Through Vol 30 17 38 38
RT Vol 15 4 129 12
Lane Flow Rate 64 36 255 269
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.086 0.051 0.316 0.363
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.82 5.073 4.473 4.846
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 738 702 802 741
Service Time 2.883 3.134 2.515 2.896
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 0.051 0.318 0.363
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.3 8.4 9.6 10.7
HCM Lane LOS AAAB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.2 1.4 1.7
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 117 146 186 334 32
Future Vol, veh/h 29 117 146 186 334 32
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 35 35 35 0 0 35
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 39 156 195 248 445 43
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1153 515 523 0 - 0
Stage 1 480 -----
Stage 2 672 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 215 554 1028 - - -
Stage 1 616 -----
Stage 2 502 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 162 517 994 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 162 -----
Stage 1 479 -----
Stage 2 485 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 18.74 4.18 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 994 - 162 517 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 - 0.239 0.302 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.5 - 34.1 14.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - 0.9 1.3 - -
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Existing Plus Project-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.7
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 37 31 43 87 13
Future Vol, veh/h 8 37 31 43 87 13
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 9 40 34 47 95 14
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 80 0 - 0 115 57
Stage 1 - - - - 57 -
Stage 2 - - - - 58 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1517 - - - 882 1009
Stage 1 - - - - 965 -
Stage 2 - - - - 965 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1517 - - - 876 1009
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 876 -
Stage 1 - - - - 960 -
Stage 2 - - - - 965 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.31 0 9.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 320 - - - 892
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - 0.122
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.4 0 - - 9.6
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-AM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 170 29 10 78 139 17 18 13 240 44 15 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 170 29 10 78 139 17 18 13 240 44 15 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 243 40 14 111 156 24 26 13 343 63 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 42 590 95 31 334 288 50 260 206 431 661 538
Arrive On Green 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.02 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.25 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2940 475 1725 1721 1485 1725 1811 1433 1725 1811 1476 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 20 140 143 14 111 156 24 26 13 343 63 1 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1694 1725 1721 1485 1725 1811 1433 1725 1811 1476 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.5 3.3 3.4 0.4 2.6 4.3 0.6 0.6 0.4 8.5 1.1 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.5 3.3 3.4 0.4 2.6 4.3 0.6 0.6 0.4 8.5 1.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 42 345 340 31 334 288 50 260 206 431 661 538 V/C Ratio(X) 0.47 0.41 0.42 0.46 0.33 0.54 0.48 0.10 0.06 0.80 0.10 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 301 791 779 263 754 650 263 872 690 1578 2253 1836 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.1 16.0 16.0 22.3 15.9 16.7 22.0 17.1 17.0 16.1 9.6 9.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.0 0.8 0.8 10.2 0.6 1.6 7.2 0.2 0.1 3.4 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.2 1.2 0.2 0.9 1.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 3.3 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 30.1 16.7 16.8 32.5 16.5 18.2 29.1 17.2 17.1 19.5 9.7 9.3 LnGrp LOS CBBCBBCBBBAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 303 281 63 407
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.7 18.3 21.7 17.9
Approach LOS B B C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.5 11.5 4.8 14.1 5.3 21.6 5.1 13.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 42.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 7.0 57.1 8.0 20.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.5 2.6 2.4 5.4 2.6 3.1 2.5 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.1 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.2
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-AM Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 20 284 14 310 24 26 19 343 63 21
v/c Ratio 0.09 0.40 0.06 0.40 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.61 0.07 0.03 Control Delay (s/veh) 25.9 20.1 26.3 9.9 26.5 25.7 0.4 20.2 11.2 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 25.9 20.1 26.3 9.9 26.5 25.7 0.4 20.2 11.2 0.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 32 3 12 6 6 0 74 6 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 23 72 18 35 26 27 0 154 34 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2611 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 291 1498 255 1406 255 847 750 1462 1709 1379 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.05 0.22 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.23 0.04 0.02 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 18.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107
Future Vol, veh/h 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 121 1 139 1 1 1 231 311 3 7 292 149
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1173 1175 386 1100 1248 333 450 0 0 324 0 0 Stage 1 390 390 - 784 784 -------
Stage 2 783 785 - 316 464 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 164 187 649 185 169 696 1079 - - 1203 - - Stage 1 622 597 - 378 396 -------
Stage 2 378 395 - 682 553 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 117 134 637 103 121 682 1069 - - 1191 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 117 134 - 103 121 -------
Stage 1 612 587 - 276 289 -------
Stage 2 275 289 - 523 544 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 82.1 28.95 3.93 0.12

HCM LOS F D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 761 - - 117 134 637 154 26 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.216 - - 1.033 0.01 0.218 0.027 0.006 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.3 0 - 163 32.1 12.2 29 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - F D B D A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - 7 0 0.8 0.1 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:59:15 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Existing Plus Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 505 2.0 959 0.527 100 6.9 LOS A 4.0 102.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 505 2.0 0.527 6.9 LOS A 4.0 102.3
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 3 2.0 594 0.005 100 8.6 LOS A 0.0 0.8 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.005 8.6 LOS A 0.0 0.8
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 899 2.0 1568 0.573 100 4.9 LOS A 5.9 150.0 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 899 2.0 0.573 4.9 LOS A 5.9 150.0
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 268 2.0 824 0.325 100 13.0 LOS B 1.9 48.3 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 268 2.0 0.325 13.0 LOS B 1.9 48.3
Intersection 1675 2.0 0.573 6.8 LOS A 5.9 150.0
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 16 489 1 505 2.0 959 0.527 100 NA NA
Approach 16 489 1 505 2.0 0.527
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 3 2.0 594 0.005 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.005
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 96 1 453 349 899 2.0 1568 0.573 100 NA NA
Approach 96 1 453 349 899 2.0 0.573
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 824 0.325 100 NA NA
Approach 1 242 1 24 268 2.0 0.325
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1675 2.0 0.573
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:18 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 10 1 9 22 159 1 22 9 93 30 1
Future Vol, veh/h 2 10 1 9 22 159 1 22 9 93 30 1
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 2 11 1 9 23 167 1 23 9 98 32 1
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 7.6 8 7.6 8.5

HCM LOSA A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 15% 5% 75%
Vol Thru, % 69% 77% 12% 24%
Vol Right, % 28% 8% 84% 1%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 32 13 190 124
LT Vol 1 2 9 93
Through Vol 22 10 22 30
RT Vol 9 1 159 1
Lane Flow Rate 34 14 200 131
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.041 0.017 0.217 0.164
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.418 4.56 3.902 4.529
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 813 788 926 781
Service Time 2.432 2.569 1.904 2.626
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 0.018 0.216 0.168
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 7.6 7.6 8 8.5
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.6
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Existing Plus Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 77 140 287 311 23
Future Vol, veh/h 10 77 140 287 311 23
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 4 4 0 0 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 11 83 151 309 334 25
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 952 342 363 0 - 0
Stage 1 338 -----
Stage 2 614 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 284 693 1179 - - -
Stage 1 715 -----
Stage 2 534 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 246 688 1175 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 246 -----
Stage 1 621 -----
Stage 2 532 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 12.02 2.79 0

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1175 - 246 688 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.128 - 0.044 0.12 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.5 - 20.3 10.9 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - C B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.1 0.4 - -
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Existing Plus Project-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.6
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 35 74 29 127 81 16
Future Vol, veh/h 35 74 29 127 81 16
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 38 80 32 138 88 17
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 170 0 - 0 257 101
Stage 1 - - - - 101 -
Stage 2 - - - - 157 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1408 - - - 732 955
Stage 1 - - - - 923 -
Stage 2 - - - - 872 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1408 - - - 711 955
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 711 -
Stage 1 - - - - 897 -
Stage 2 - - - - 872 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.45 0 10.65

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 578 - - - 742
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.027 - - - 0.142
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.6 0 - - 10.7
HCM Lane LOS A A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.5
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-PM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 44 151 36 19 157 117 47 122 65 139 48 41 Future Volume (veh/h) 44 151 36 19 157 117 47 122 65 139 48 41 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 182 42 23 189 111 57 147 62 167 58 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 91 699 155 48 479 264 96 385 295 222 517 405 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.13 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2746 611 1725 2093 1153 1725 1811 1389 1725 1811 1418 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 112 112 23 153 147 57 147 62 167 58 37 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1636 1725 1721 1526 1725 1811 1389 1725 1811 1418 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 2.4 2.6 0.6 3.6 3.9 1.5 3.3 1.7 4.4 1.1 0.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.4 2.4 2.6 0.6 3.6 3.9 1.5 3.3 1.7 4.4 1.1 0.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 91 438 416 48 394 349 96 385 295 222 517 405 V/C Ratio(X) 0.58 0.25 0.27 0.48 0.39 0.42 0.59 0.38 0.21 0.75 0.11 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 584 1059 1007 292 768 681 255 1077 826 985 1843 1444 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 21.9 14.0 14.1 22.6 15.4 15.5 21.8 15.9 15.3 19.9 12.5 12.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.7 0.3 0.3 7.4 0.6 0.8 5.7 0.6 0.3 5.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.3 1.3 1.3 0.7 1.3 0.5 1.9 0.4 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 27.5 14.3 14.4 30.1 16.0 16.3 27.5 16.6 15.7 25.0 12.6 12.5 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 277 323 266 262
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.9 17.2 18.7 20.5
Approach LOS B B B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.1 15.0 5.3 16.9 6.6 18.4 6.5 15.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 28.1 8.0 29.1 7.0 48.1 16.0 21.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 5.3 2.6 4.6 3.5 3.1 3.4 5.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.4 1.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.1 1.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 18.2
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Existing Plus Project-PM Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 225 23 330 57 147 78 167 58 49 v/c Ratio 0.19 0.24 0.10 0.45 0.23 0.37 0.18 0.41 0.09 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 27.6 15.9 28.9 15.6 30.1 25.6 0.9 25.0 16.1 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 27.6 15.9 28.9 15.6 30.1 25.6 0.9 25.0 16.1 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 24 7 31 19 46 0 52 16 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 52 68 30 72 58 107 0 117 41 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2599 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 630 2009 315 1582 275 1081 886 1001 1521 1171 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.11 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.09 0.17 0.04 0.04 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 68 1 161 1 1 4 147 363 2 3 270 46
Future Vol, veh/h 68 1 161 1 1 4 147 363 2 3 270 46
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 73 1 173 1 1 4 158 390 2 3 290 49
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1048 1050 335 1025 1074 411 350 0 0 402 0 0 Stage 1 332 332 - 718 718 -------
Stage 2 717 719 - 307 356 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 200 222 693 208 215 628 1176 - - 1124 - - Stage 1 669 634 - 411 424 -------
Stage 2 411 424 - 690 618 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 160 179 680 125 173 616 1165 - - 1114 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 160 179 - 125 173 -------
Stage 1 661 626 - 336 347 -------
Stage 2 333 347 - 507 610 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 21.94 17.45 2.46 0.08

HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 516 - - 160 179 680 296 16 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.136 - - 0.457 0.006 0.255 0.022 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.6 0 - 45.2 25.2 12.1 17.4 8.2 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - E D B C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 2.1 0 1 0.1 0 - -

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:59:39 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 575 5.0 926 0.621 100 8.9 LOS A 5.9 152.1 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 575 5.0 0.621 8.9 LOS A 5.9 152.1
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 4 5.0 495 0.008 100 10.0 LOS A 0.0 1.2 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.008 10.0 LOS A 0.0 1.2
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 1041 5.0 1310 0.795 100 6.0 LOS A 12.1 314.7 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1041 5.0 0.795 6.0 LOS A 12.1 314.7
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 239 5.0 688 0.348 100 13.8 LOS B 2.3 58.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 239 5.0 0.348 13.8 LOS B 2.3 58.8
Intersection 1859 5.0 0.795 7.9 LOS A 12.1 314.7
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 76 497 1 575 5.0 926 0.621 100 NA NA
Approach 76 497 1 575 5.0 0.621
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 4 5.0 495 0.008 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.008
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 108 1 474 458 1041 5.0 1310 0.795 100 NA NA
Approach 108 1 474 458 1041 5.0 0.795
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 9 214 1 14 239 5.0 688 0.348 100 NA NA
Approach 9 214 1 14 239 5.0 0.348
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1859 5.0 0.795
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:15 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.9
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 103 4 24 67 129 3 30 15 152 38 13
Future Vol, veh/h 8 103 4 24 67 129 3 30 15 152 38 13
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 11 137 5 32 89 172 4 40 20 203 51 17
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.9 11 9 11.9

HCM LOSA B A B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 6% 7% 11% 75%
Vol Thru, % 63% 90% 30% 19%
Vol Right, % 31% 3% 59% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 48 115 220 203
LT Vol 3 8 24 152
Through Vol 30 103 67 38
RT Vol 15 4 129 13
Lane Flow Rate 64 153 293 271
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.096 0.227 0.395 0.402
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.408 5.327 4.848 5.344
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 662 675 748 674
Service Time 3.444 3.358 2.848 3.37
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.097 0.227 0.392 0.402
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9 9.9 11 11.9
HCM Lane LOS AABB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.9 1.9 1.9
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 12.5
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 94 138 154 186 334 53
Future Vol, veh/h 94 138 154 186 334 53
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 35 35 35 0 0 35
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 75 75 75 75 75 75
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 125 184 205 248 445 71
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1174 515 551 0 - 0
Stage 1 480 -----
Stage 2 694 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 209 554 1004 - - -
Stage 1 616 -----
Stage 2 490 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 154 517 970 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 154 -----
Stage 1 469 -----
Stage 2 474 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 45.03 4.39 0

HCM LOS E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 970 - 154 517 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.212 - 0.814 0.356 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.7 - 88 15.8 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - 5.3 1.6 - -
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Near-Term With Project-AM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 5.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 38 33 51 94 36
Future Vol, veh/h 10 38 33 51 94 36
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 11 41 36 55 102 39
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 91 0 - 0 127 64
Stage 1 - - - - 64 -
Stage 2 - - - - 63 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - - 868 1001
Stage 1 - - - - 959 -
Stage 2 - - - - 960 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - - 862 1001
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 862 -
Stage 1 - - - - 952 -
Stage 2 - - - - 960 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.54 0 9.77

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 375 - - - 896
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - - 0.158
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.4 0 - - 9.8
HCM Lane LOS A A - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.6
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-AM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 217 39 10 94 150 21 20 13 272 52 15 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 217 39 10 94 150 21 20 13 272 52 15 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 20 310 55 14 134 171 30 29 13 389 74 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 42 600 105 31 344 297 59 247 195 476 685 558 Arrive On Green 0.02 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.14 0.14 0.28 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2901 506 1725 1721 1486 1725 1811 1429 1725 1811 1477 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 20 182 183 14 134 171 30 29 13 389 74 1 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1687 1725 1721 1486 1725 1811 1429 1725 1811 1477 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 4.6 4.7 0.4 3.3 5.1 0.8 0.7 0.4 10.3 1.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.6 4.6 4.7 0.4 3.3 5.1 0.8 0.7 0.4 10.3 1.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 42 356 349 31 344 297 59 247 195 476 685 558 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.51 0.53 0.46 0.39 0.58 0.51 0.12 0.07 0.82 0.11 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 282 741 727 246 706 610 246 817 645 1479 2111 1721 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.6 17.2 17.3 23.8 17.0 17.7 23.3 18.6 18.4 16.6 9.9 9.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.2 1.1 1.2 10.3 0.7 1.8 6.6 0.2 0.1 3.5 0.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 1.7 1.7 0.2 1.2 1.7 0.4 0.3 0.1 4.0 0.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 31.8 18.4 18.5 34.2 17.7 19.5 29.9 18.8 18.6 20.1 9.9 9.5 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 385 319 72 464
Approach Delay, s/veh 19.1 19.4 23.4 18.5
Approach LOS B B C B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.5 11.6 4.9 15.0 5.7 23.4 5.2 14.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 42.0 22.1 7.0 21.1 7.0 57.1 8.0 20.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 2.7 2.4 6.7 2.8 3.3 2.6 7.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.5 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.2
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-AM Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 20 366 14 348 30 29 19 389 74 21
v/c Ratio 0.10 0.48 0.07 0.41 0.14 0.13 0.06 0.65 0.08 0.03 Control Delay (s/veh) 29.9 21.8 30.4 10.5 30.6 29.4 0.4 22.1 11.7 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 29.9 21.8 30.4 10.5 30.6 29.4 0.4 22.1 11.7 0.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 5 46 4 16 8 8 0 94 8 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 98 20 41 34 32 0 192 41 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2611 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 266 1370 233 1318 233 774 698 1368 1656 1340 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.08 0.27 0.06 0.26 0.13 0.04 0.03 0.28 0.04 0.02 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 36.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113
Future Vol, veh/h 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72 72
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 144 1 224 1 1 1 258 311 3 7 292 157
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1233 1235 390 1155 1312 333 459 0 0 324 0 0 Stage 1 394 394 - 839 839 -------
Stage 2 838 841 - 316 473 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 150 172 645 169 154 696 1071 - - 1203 - - Stage 1 619 595 - 352 373 -------
Stage 2 352 372 - 682 549 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 101 118 633 74 106 682 1061 - - 1191 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 101 118 - 74 106 -------
Stage 1 608 585 - 246 260 -------
Stage 2 244 260 - 433 539 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 131.37 35.24 4.28 0.12

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 811 - - 101 118 633 123 26 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.243 - - 1.424 0.012 0.353 0.034 0.006 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.5 0 -$ 314.3 35.9 13.8 35.2 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - F EBEAA -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - - 10.5 0 1.6 0.1 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 2:00:12 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project (Site Folder: Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM Near Term With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 505 2.0 933 0.541 100 7.4 LOS A 4.3 109.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 505 2.0 0.541 7.4 LOS A 4.3 109.6
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 3 2.0 575 0.005 100 8.8 LOS A 0.0 0.8 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.005 8.8 LOS A 0.0 0.8
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 942 2.0 1571 0.599 100 4.8 LOS A 6.5 166.2 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 942 2.0 0.599 4.8 LOS A 6.5 166.2
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 291 2.0 822 0.354 100 13.1 LOS B 2.1 53.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 291 2.0 0.354 13.1 LOS B 2.1 53.6
Intersection 1741 2.0 0.599 7.0 LOS A 6.5 166.2
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 16 489 1 505 2.0 933 0.541 100 NA NA
Approach 16 489 1 505 2.0 0.541
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 3 2.0 575 0.005 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.005
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 96 1 453 392 942 2.0 1571 0.599 100 NA NA
Approach 96 1 453 392 942 2.0 0.599
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 1 265 1 24 291 2.0 822 0.354 100 NA NA
Approach 1 265 1 24 291 2.0 0.354
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 1741 2.0 0.599
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:18 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 7th AWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 67 1 9 115 159 1 22 9 93 30 3
Future Vol, veh/h 3 67 1 9 115 159 1 22 9 93 30 3
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 3 71 1 9 121 167 1 23 9 98 32 3
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.3 9.4 8.1 9.1

HCM LOSA A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 4% 3% 74%
Vol Thru, % 69% 94% 41% 24%
Vol Right, % 28% 1% 56% 2%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 32 71 283 126
LT Vol 1 3 9 93
Through Vol 22 67 115 30
RT Vol 9 1 159 3
Lane Flow Rate 34 75 298 133
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.045 0.098 0.345 0.183
Departure Headway (Hd) 4.818 4.719 4.165 4.977
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 741 759 864 720
Service Time 2.86 2.751 2.186 3.013
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.046 0.099 0.345 0.185
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.1 8.3 9.4 9.1
HCM Lane LOS AAAA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.1 0.3 1.5 0.7
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 52 92 162 287 311 94
Future Vol, veh/h 52 92 162 287 311 94
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 4 4 0 0 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 56 99 174 309 334 101
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 999 342 439 0 - 0
Stage 1 338 -----
Stage 2 661 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 266 693 1105 - - -
Stage 1 715 -----
Stage 2 508 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 222 688 1100 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 222 -----
Stage 1 600 -----
Stage 2 506 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 16.68 3.21 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1100 - 222 688 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.158 - 0.251 0.144 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.9 - 26.5 11.1 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - D B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - 1 0.5 - -
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Near-Term With Project-PM
HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 43 76 30 153 93 21
Future Vol, veh/h 43 76 30 153 93 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 47 83 33 166 101 23
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 199 0 - 0 292 116
Stage 1 - - - - 116 -
Stage 2 - - - - 176 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1373 - - - 699 937
Stage 1 - - - - 909 -
Stage 2 - - - - 854 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1373 - - - 674 937
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 674 -
Stage 1 - - - - 877 -
Stage 2 - - - - 854 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 2.79 0 11.13

HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 650 - - - 711
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.034 - - - 0.174
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 7.7 0 - - 11.1
HCM Lane LOS A A - - B
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.6
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-PM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 44 182 43 19 210 153 59 130 65 160 53 41 Future Volume (veh/h) 44 182 43 19 210 153 59 130 65 160 53 41 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 219 51 23 253 154 71 157 62 193 64 37 Peak Hour Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 89 741 167 47 505 293 107 378 290 252 531 416 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.27 0.27 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2740 618 1725 2050 1191 1725 1811 1387 1725 1811 1421 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 135 135 23 210 197 71 157 62 193 64 37 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1637 1725 1721 1521 1725 1811 1387 1725 1811 1421 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 3.2 3.4 0.7 5.4 5.7 2.1 3.9 1.9 5.5 1.3 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.5 3.2 3.4 0.7 5.4 5.7 2.1 3.9 1.9 5.5 1.3 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 89 466 443 47 424 374 107 378 290 252 531 416 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.29 0.30 0.49 0.50 0.53 0.66 0.41 0.21 0.76 0.12 0.09 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 538 976 929 269 708 626 235 992 760 908 1698 1332 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.8 14.8 14.9 24.6 16.6 16.7 23.5 17.6 16.8 21.1 13.3 13.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.2 0.3 0.4 7.7 0.9 1.1 6.9 0.7 0.4 4.8 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.7 1.1 1.2 0.4 2.0 1.9 1.0 1.5 0.6 2.4 0.5 0.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 30.0 15.1 15.3 32.3 17.5 17.9 30.4 18.3 17.2 25.8 13.4 13.2 LnGrp LOS C B B C B B C B B C B B
Approach Vol, veh/h 323 430 290 294
Approach Delay, s/veh 17.6 18.5 21.0 21.5
Approach LOS B B C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.5 15.6 5.4 18.8 7.2 19.9 6.7 17.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 27.0 28.1 8.0 29.1 7.0 48.1 16.0 21.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.5 5.9 2.7 5.4 4.1 3.3 3.5 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.5 0.1 2.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.5
HCM 7th LOS B
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Near-Term With Project-PM Queues 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 271 23 437 71 157 78 193 64 49 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.31 0.12 0.57 0.33 0.44 0.19 0.51 0.10 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 32.1 19.2 33.7 18.7 36.4 29.7 1.0 29.1 17.8 0.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 32.1 19.2 33.7 18.7 36.4 29.7 1.0 29.1 17.8 0.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 32 8 53 26 55 0 67 18 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 85 34 108 78 128 0 148 48 0
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2599 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 508 1769 254 1310 222 940 793 858 1438 1114 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.15 0.09 0.33 0.32 0.17 0.10 0.22 0.04 0.04 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/12/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 10.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66
Future Vol, veh/h 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 86 1 216 1 1 4 232 390 2 3 290 71
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1208 1209 346 1173 1244 411 371 0 0 402 0 0 Stage 1 342 342 - 866 866 -------
Stage 2 865 867 - 307 378 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 156 178 684 164 170 628 1155 - - 1124 - - Stage 1 661 627 - 340 362 -------
Stage 2 340 362 - 690 605 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 111 129 671 80 123 616 1144 - - 1114 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 111 129 - 80 123 -------
Stage 1 652 619 - 249 266 -------
Stage 2 247 265 - 461 597 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 38.95 21.77 3.33 0.07

HCM LOS E C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 668 - - 111 129 671 221 15 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.203 - - 0.775 0.008 0.322 0.029 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.9 0 - 104.5 33.2 12.9 21.8 8.2 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - F D B C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - 4.3 0 1.4 0.1 0 - -

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 2:00:35 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick AM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 638 5.0 961 0.663 100 9.4 LOS A 7.0 181.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 638 5.0 0.663 9.4 LOS A 7.0 181.6
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 4 5.0 471 0.007 100 10.9 LOS B 0.0 1.2 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 4 5.0 0.007 10.9 LOS B 0.0 1.2
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 1138 5.0 1342 0.848 100 6.3 LOS A 15.0 389.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1138 5.0 0.848 6.3 LOS A 15.0 389.8
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 260 5.0 675 0.385 100 14.0 LOS B 2.7 70.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 260 5.0 0.385 14.0 LOS B 2.7 70.6
Intersection 2039 5.0 0.848 8.3 LOS A 15.0 389.8
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 85 552 1 638 5.0 961 0.663 100 NA NA
Approach 85 552 1 638 5.0 0.663
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 4 5.0 471 0.007 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 4 5.0 0.007
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 111 1 524 502 1138 5.0 1342 0.848 100 NA NA
Approach 111 1 524 502 1138 5.0 0.848
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 11 232 1 16 260 5.0 675 0.385 100 NA NA
Approach 11 232 1 16 260 5.0 0.385
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 2039 5.0 0.848
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:10:50 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th AWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 13
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 9 105 5 30 76 159 4 37 19 186 47 16
Future Vol, veh/h 9 105 5 30 76 159 4 37 19 186 47 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 12 140 7 40 101 212 5 49 25 248 63 21
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 10.7 13.3 9.7 14.6

HCM LOSB B A B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 7% 8% 11% 75%
Vol Thru, % 62% 88% 29% 19%
Vol Right, % 32% 4% 60% 6%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 60 119 265 249
LT Vol 4 9 30 186
Through Vol 37 105 76 47
RT Vol 19 5 159 16
Lane Flow Rate 80 159 353 332
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.129 0.253 0.502 0.518
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.802 5.734 5.118 5.612
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 615 624 703 641
Service Time 3.864 3.79 3.164 3.656
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.13 0.255 0.502 0.518
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 9.7 10.7 13.3 14.6
HCM Lane LOS ABBB
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 1 2.8 3
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 13.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 101 165 190 262 412 61
Future Vol, veh/h 101 165 190 262 412 61
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 35 35 35 0 0 35
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 115 188 216 298 468 69
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1268 538 573 0 - 0
Stage 1 503 -----
Stage 2 765 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 183 537 986 - - -
Stage 1 601 -----
Stage 2 454 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 133 502 953 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 133 -----
Stage 1 449 -----
Stage 2 439 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 51.61 4.15 0

HCM LOS F
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 953 - 133 502 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.227 - 0.866 0.373 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.9 - 109.2 16.4 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - F C - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - 5.5 1.7 - -
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 176 377 92 88 106
Future Vol, veh/h 20 176 377 92 88 106
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 22 191 410 100 96 115
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 510 0 - 0 695 460
Stage 1 - - - - 460 -
Stage 2 - - - - 235 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1055 - - - 408 601
Stage 1 - - - - 636 -
Stage 2 - - - - 804 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1055 - - - 399 601
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 399 -
Stage 1 - - - - 621 -
Stage 2 - - - - 804 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 0.87 0 17.83

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 184 - - - 489
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.431
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.5 0 - - 17.8
HCM Lane LOS A A - - C
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 2.1
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 66 233 48 23 236 192 95 158 21 341 139 147 Future Volume (veh/h) 66 233 48 23 236 192 95 158 21 341 139 147 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.96 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 265 44 26 268 175 108 180 19 388 158 134 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 103 713 116 51 425 267 140 299 238 459 634 516 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.35 0.35 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2938 479 1725 2001 1257 1725 1811 1442 1725 1811 1475 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 153 156 26 229 214 108 180 19 388 158 134 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1696 1725 1721 1538 1725 1811 1442 1725 1811 1475 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.6 4.4 4.6 0.9 7.2 7.6 3.7 5.5 0.7 12.8 3.7 3.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.6 4.4 4.6 0.9 7.2 7.6 3.7 5.5 0.7 12.8 3.7 3.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 103 418 412 51 366 327 140 299 238 459 634 516 V/C Ratio(X) 0.73 0.37 0.38 0.51 0.63 0.66 0.77 0.60 0.08 0.85 0.25 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 305 744 733 173 612 547 397 674 537 1094 1406 1144 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.7 18.9 18.9 28.7 21.4 21.6 27.0 23.2 21.2 20.8 13.9 13.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.5 0.5 0.6 7.9 1.8 2.2 8.7 2.0 0.1 4.4 0.2 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 1.7 1.7 0.5 2.9 2.7 1.8 2.4 0.2 5.2 1.4 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 37.2 19.4 19.5 36.5 23.2 23.8 35.7 25.2 21.3 25.2 14.1 14.2 LnGrp LOS DBBDCCDCCCBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 384 469 307 680
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.9 24.2 28.6 20.4
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19.9 14.8 5.8 19.4 8.9 25.9 7.6 17.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.0 22.3 6.0 25.9 13.8 46.5 10.6 21.3 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 14.8 7.5 2.9 6.6 5.7 5.9 4.6 9.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.2 0.9 0.0 1.7 0.1 1.4 0.1 2.1 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 23.3
HCM 7th LOS C
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 75 320 26 486 108 180 24 388 158 167 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.35 0.18 0.67 0.46 0.55 0.06 0.74 0.22 0.25 Control Delay (s/veh) 45.8 25.5 47.0 26.4 44.9 41.1 0.3 36.4 20.8 4.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 45.8 25.5 47.0 26.4 44.9 41.1 0.3 36.4 20.8 4.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 57 13 81 53 88 0 183 59 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 102 140 48 169 133 188 0 344 118 39 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2611 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 258 1252 146 1070 336 572 579 926 1144 980 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.26 0.18 0.45 0.32 0.31 0.04 0.42 0.14 0.17 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 41.4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139
Future Vol, veh/h 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 142 1 201 1 1 1 253 316 2 6 358 158
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1292 1293 457 1214 1371 337 526 0 0 328 0 0 Stage 1 458 458 - 834 834 -------
Stage 2 833 835 - 380 537 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 136 158 591 154 142 692 1011 - - 1198 - - Stage 1 571 557 - 354 375 -------
Stage 2 354 375 - 630 513 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 91 107 580 67 96 678 1001 - - 1187 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 91 107 - 67 96 -------
Stage 1 562 548 - 243 257 -------
Stage 2 242 257 - 404 505 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 165.71 38.1 4.35 0.09

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 797 - - 91 107 580 112 18 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.253 - - 1.563 0.011 0.347 0.03 0.005 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.8 0 -$ 380.9 39.1 14.5 38.1 8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - F EBEAA -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - - 11.2 0 1.5 0.1 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon

SITE LAYOUT
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Layout pictures are schematic functional drawings reflecting input data. They are not design drawings.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Created: Friday, February 13, 2026 2:01:02 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9

LANE SUMMARY
Site: 101 [Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project (Site Folder:

Oller and Derrick)]
Oller and Derrick PM 2047 With Project
Site Category: (None)
Roundabout
Lane Use and Performance
DEMAND
FLOWS
95% BACK OF
Cap. QUEUE
Deg.

Satn
Lane
Util.

Aver.

Delay
Level of
Service
Lane
Config
Lane
Length
Cap.

Adj.

Prob.

Block.
[ Total HV ] [ Veh Dist ]
veh/h % veh/h v/c % sec ft ft % %
SouthEast: Oller St (SR 180)
Lane 1d 625 2.0 920 0.679 100 10.0 LOS B 7.5 190.4 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 625 2.0 0.679 10.0 LOS B 7.5 190.4
NorthEast: Private Dr
Lane 1d 3 2.0 465 0.007 100 11.5 LOS B 0.0 1.1 Full 60 0.0 0.0 Approach 3 2.0 0.007 11.5 LOS B 0.0 1.1
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 1143 2.0 1602 0.713 100 4.9 LOS A 10.6 268.6 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 1143 2.0 0.713 4.9 LOS A 10.6 268.6
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Lane 1d 356 2.0 780 0.457 100 14.9 LOS B 3.3 84.8 Full 1600 0.0 0.0 Approach 356 2.0 0.457 14.9 LOS B 3.3 84.8
Intersection 2127 2.0 0.713 8.1 LOS A 10.6 268.6
Site Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 6). Site LOS Method is specified in the Parameter Settings dialog (Site tab).

Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control.

Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane.

LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection).

Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 6).

Roundabout Capacity Model: SIDRA Standard.

Delay Model: SIDRA Standard (Geometric Delay is included).

Queue Model: HCM Queue Formula.

Gap-Acceptance Capacity: SIDRA Standard (Akçelik M3D).

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SE
To Exit: SW NW NE
Lane 1 20 604 1 625 2.0 920 0.679 100 NA NA
Approach 20 604 1 625 2.0 0.679
NorthEast: Private Dr
Mov. L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NE
To Exit: SE SW NW
Lane 1 1 1 1 3 2.0 465 0.007 100 NA NA
Approach 1 1 1 3 2.0 0.007
NorthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From NW
To Exit: NW NE SE SW
Lane 1 114 1 561 467 1143 2.0 1602 0.713 100 NA NA
Approach 114 1 561 467 1143 2.0 0.713
SouthWest: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Mov. U L2 T1 R2 Total %HV
Cap.
veh/h
Deg.

Satn
v/c
Lane
Util.
%
Prob.

SL Ov.
%
Ov.

Lane
No.

From SW
To Exit: SW NW NE SE
Lane 1 1 324 1 30 356 2.0 780 0.457 100 NA NA
Approach 1 324 1 30 356 2.0 0.457
Total %HV Deg.Satn (v/c)
Intersection 2127 2.0 0.713
Lane flow rates given in this report are based on the arrival flow rates subject to upstream capacity constraint where applicable.

Merge Analysis
Exit
Lane
Number
Short
Lane
Length
Percent
Opng in
Lane
Opposing
Flow Rate
Critical
Gap
Follow-up
Headway
Lane
Flow
Rate
Capacity Deg.

Satn
Min.

Delay
Merge
Delay
ft % veh/h pcu/h sec sec veh/h veh/h v/c sec sec
SouthEast Exit: Oller St (SR 180)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthEast Exit: Private Dr
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

NorthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SouthWest Exit: Derrick Ave (SR 33)
Merge Type: Not Applied
Full Length Lane 1 Merge Analysis not applied.

SIDRA INTERSECTION 9.0 | Copyright © 2000-2020 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd | sidrasolutions.com Organisation: PETERS ENGINEERING GROUP | Licence: PLUS / 1PC | Processed: Friday, February 13, 2026 1:03:19 PM Project: S:\2025\25-040\Analysis\Sidra\Oller - Derrick.sip9 2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th AWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.1
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 68 2 11 118 214 2 56 11 113 37 5
Future Vol, veh/h 3 68 2 11 118 214 2 56 11 113 37 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 3 72 2 12 124 225 2 59 12 119 39 5
Number of Lanes 010010010010
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1111
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1111
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1111
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.7 10.7 8.8 9.9

HCM LOSA B A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, % 3% 4% 3% 73%
Vol Thru, % 81% 93% 34% 24%
Vol Right, % 16% 3% 62% 3%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 69 73 343 155
LT Vol 2 3 11 113
Through Vol 56 68 118 37
RT Vol 11 2 214 5
Lane Flow Rate 73 77 361 163
Geometry Grp 1111
Degree of Util (X) 0.103 0.107 0.434 0.235
Departure Headway (Hd) 5.11 4.997 4.327 5.191
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 695 713 830 687
Service Time 3.185 3.059 2.368 3.257
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.105 0.108 0.435 0.237
HCM Control Delay, s/veh 8.8 8.7 10.7 9.9
HCM Lane LOS AABA
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.3 0.4 2.2 0.9
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.9
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 57 110 206 353 385 100
Future Vol, veh/h 57 110 206 353 385 100
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 4 4 0 0 4
Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 590 0 0 - - 0
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Mvmt Flow 61 118 222 380 414 108
Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1245 422 526 0 - 0
Stage 1 418 -----
Stage 2 827 -----
Critical Hdwy 6.45 6.25 4.15 - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.45 - - - - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.545 3.345 2.245 - - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 189 625 1026 - - -
Stage 1 658 -----
Stage 2 425 -----
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 147 621 1022 - - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 147 -----
Stage 1 513 -----
Stage 2 423 -----
Approach EB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 23.66 3.5 0

HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h) 1022 - 147 621 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.217 - 0.416 0.191 - -
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.5 - 45.8 12.2 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - E B - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - 1.8 0.7 - -
4: Belmont Ave & Amador Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.1
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 58 410 202 186 115 27
Future Vol, veh/h 58 410 202 186 115 27
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 63 446 220 202 125 29
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All 422 0 - 0 892 321
Stage 1 - - - - 321 -
Stage 2 - - - - 572 -
Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1137 - - - 312 720
Stage 1 - - - - 736 -
Stage 2 - - - - 565 -
Platoon blocked, % - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1137 - - - 289 720
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 289 -
Stage 1 - - - - 681 -
Stage 2 - - - - 565 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 1.03 0 25.54

HCM LOS D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1
Capacity (veh/h) 223 - - - 326
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.055 - - - 0.473
HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 8.4 0 - - 25.5
HCM Lane LOS A A - - D
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - - 2.4
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 180 292 77 59 243 201 86 208 106 213 214 97 Future Volume (veh/h) 180 292 77 59 243 201 86 208 106 213 214 97 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.93 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 196 317 68 64 264 175 93 226 92 232 233 84 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Cap, veh/h 245 867 182 89 436 276 120 376 287 285 549 432 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.31 0.31 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.17 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1725 2787 586 1725 1972 1248 1725 1811 1386 1725 1811 1423 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 196 193 192 64 229 210 93 226 92 232 233 84 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1725 1721 1652 1725 1721 1500 1725 1811 1386 1725 1811 1423 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.4 5.9 6.1 2.5 8.1 8.6 3.6 7.6 3.8 8.7 6.9 2.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.4 5.9 6.1 2.5 8.1 8.6 3.6 7.6 3.8 8.7 6.9 2.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 535 514 89 380 331 120 376 287 285 549 432 V/C Ratio(X) 0.80 0.36 0.37 0.72 0.60 0.63 0.78 0.60 0.32 0.81 0.42 0.19 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 563 853 819 251 541 472 328 645 494 640 973 765 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.0 18.0 18.1 31.5 23.6 23.8 30.8 24.2 22.7 27.1 18.8 17.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.9 0.4 0.4 10.2 1.5 2.0 10.2 1.6 0.6 5.6 0.5 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 3.3 2.2 2.2 1.2 3.2 3.0 1.8 3.3 1.2 3.9 2.8 0.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 33.9 18.4 18.5 41.6 25.1 25.8 41.1 25.7 23.3 32.7 19.3 17.6 LnGrp LOS CBBDCCDCCCBB
Approach Vol, veh/h 581 503 411 549
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.7 27.5 28.7 24.7
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.2 18.9 7.5 25.9 8.7 25.3 13.6 19.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.0 24.0 9.8 33.4 12.8 36.2 22.0 21.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 10.7 9.6 4.5 8.1 5.6 8.9 9.4 10.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 1.4 0.0 2.4 0.1 1.7 0.4 2.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 25.9
HCM 7th LOS C
5: Belmont Ave & Derrick Ave (SR-33) Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 196 401 64 482 93 226 115 232 233 105 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.41 0.37 0.69 0.45 0.64 0.28 0.66 0.41 0.20 Control Delay (s/veh) 43.8 25.0 47.6 27.4 46.7 42.2 2.7 42.7 27.8 3.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 43.8 25.0 47.6 27.4 46.7 42.2 2.7 42.7 27.8 3.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 98 86 32 80 47 112 0 115 103 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 213 160 93 173 122 236 9 242 206 22 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2599 1105 701 2132
Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 140 565 335
Base Capacity (vph) 487 1418 217 971 283 559 543 554 844 710 Starvation Cap Reductn 0000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 0000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 0000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.28 0.29 0.50 0.33 0.40 0.21 0.42 0.28 0.15 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM HCM 7th TWSC 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 61.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106
Future Vol, veh/h 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 10
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length 140 - 500 ---------
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93
Heavy Vehicles, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Mvmt Flow 135 1 253 1 1 4 260 482 2 3 404 114
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1490 1492 481 1435 1548 503 528 0 0 494 0 0 Stage 1 478 478 - 1013 1013 -------
Stage 2 1013 1014 - 421 535 -------
Critical Hdwy 7.18 6.58 6.28 7.18 6.58 6.28 4.18 - - 4.18 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.18 5.58 - 6.18 5.58 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 4.072 3.372 3.572 4.072 3.372 2.272 - - 2.272 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 99 120 573 108 111 557 1009 - - 1039 - - Stage 1 557 546 - 281 309 -------
Stage 2 281 309 - 598 514 -------
Platoon blocked, % - - - -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 61 75 562 37 70 546 999 - - 1029 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 61 75 - 37 70 -------
Stage 1 550 538 - 179 197 -------
Stage 2 177 197 - 324 507 -------
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Ctrl Dly, s/v 256.4 35.82 3.45 0.05

HCM LOS F E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1 EBLn2 EBLn3WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 629 - - 61 75 562 123 11 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.26 - - 2.221 0.014 0.45 0.052 0.003 - - HCM Ctrl Dly (s/v) 9.9 0 -$ 705.4 53.5 16.5 35.8 8.5 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - F F C E A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - - 13.2 0 2.3 0.2 0 - -
Notes
~: Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s
+: Computation Not Defined *: All major volume in platoon TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrants
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Sorensen Ave
NB/SB
1 30
Smoot Ave
EB/WB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 236 183
17:00 146 166
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Derrick Ave (SR-33)
NB/SB
2 30
Smoot Ave
EB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 679 139
16:45 735 82
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
SR-180 (Oller St)
NB/SB
1 30
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 682 153
17:00 766 206
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Sorensen Ave
NB/SB
1 30
Smoot Ave
EB/WB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 236 183
17:00 146 166
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Derrick Ave (SR-33)
NB/SB
2 30
Smoot Ave
EB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 679 139
16:45 735 82
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
-
1 0
Amador Ave

EB/WB/SB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
SR-180 (Oller St)
NB/SB
1 30
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Existing Plus Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 714 188
17:00 831 230
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Sorensen Ave
NB/SB
1 30
Smoot Ave
EB/WB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 309 265
17:00 224 343
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Derrick Ave (SR-33)
NB/SB
2 30
Smoot Ave
EB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 925 266
16:45 1,044 167
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
1 30
Amador Ave
SB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 665 194
16:45 856 142
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
SR-180 (Oller St)
NB/SB
1 30
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour Near-Term With Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 740 266
17:00 920 282
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Sorensen Ave
NB/SB
1 30
Smoot Ave
EB/WB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
2: Sorensen Ave & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 309 265
17:00 224 343
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Derrick Ave (SR-33)
NB/SB
2 30
Smoot Ave
EB
2 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 925 266
16:45 1,044 167
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
1 30
Amador Ave
SB
1 30
No
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
4: Amador Ave & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 665 194
16:45 856 142
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Intersection Information:

Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Major Street Minor Street
Approach Speed
Warrant 3 Met?
SR-180 (Oller St)
NB/SB
1 30
Belmont Ave
EB/WB
2 30
Yes
Details
Low Population?
Condition A Met?
Notes
Condition B Met?
Notes
Minor Approach Time Delay Condition Met?
Minor Approach Volume Condition Met?
Total Entering Intersection Volume Condition Met?
No
0 Hours met (1 required)
Yes
2 Hours met (1 required)
Not Met
Not Met
Met
No
1 2/17/2026 California 2012
Warrant 3: Peak Hour 2047 With Project
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave
Major Street
Total All
Approaches (vph)
Minor Street
Highest Volume
Approach (vph)
Hour
7:30 962 303
17:00 1,177 362
2 2/17/2026 California 2012
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX E

IMPROVED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEETS
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107 Future Volume (veh/h) 87 1 100 1 1 1 166 224 2 5 210 107 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 121 1 111 1 1 1 231 311 3 7 292 120 Peak Hour Factor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 154 357 287 3 87 87 286 821 8 16 365 150
Arrive On Green 0.09 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.17 0.47 0.47 0.01 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1429 1697 781 781 1697 1761 17 1697 1190 489 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 121 1 111 1 0 2 231 0 314 7 0 412
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1429 1697 0 1561 1697 0 1778 1697 0 1679 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.2 0.0 6.3 0.2 0.0 12.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.9 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.2 0.0 6.3 0.2 0.0 12.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.29
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 154 357 287 3 0 174 286 0 829 16 0 515 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.39 0.33 0.00 0.01 0.81 0.00 0.38 0.45 0.00 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 277 681 546 181 0 509 492 0 1265 181 0 888 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 17.7 19.1 27.5 0.0 21.8 22.1 0.0 9.5 27.2 0.0 17.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 8.6 0.0 0.9 52.1 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.3 18.7 0.0 2.9 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 2.1 0.2 0.0 4.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 33.1 17.7 20.0 79.7 0.0 21.9 27.4 0.0 9.8 45.9 0.0 20.5 LnGrp LOS C B B E C C A D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 233 3 545 419
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.8 41.1 17.3 20.9
Approach LOS C D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.5 30.7 4.1 16.0 13.3 21.8 9.0 11.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.9 39.3 5.9 21.1 16.0 29.2 9.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.2 8.3 2.0 5.7 9.2 14.5 5.9 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 2.3 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 20.5
HCM 7th LOS C
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 121 1 139 1 2 231 314 7 441
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.00 0.40 0.01 0.01 0.55 0.25 0.04 0.69
Control Delay (s/veh) 33.4 28.0 7.6 31.0 27.0 28.3 6.7 30.4 22.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 33.4 28.0 7.6 31.0 27.0 28.3 6.7 30.4 22.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 40 0 0 0 0 71 33 2 125
Queue Length 95th (ft) 92 4 12 4 6 145 114 13 204
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 296 731 687 194 562 526 1291 194 963 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.00 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.44 0.24 0.04 0.46 Intersection Summary
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46 Future Volume (veh/h) 68 1 137 1 1 4 108 347 2 3 260 46 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 73 1 118 1 1 4 116 373 2 3 280 39
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 117 355 284 4 38 154 153 630 3 7 412 57
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.27 0.27 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1429 1697 293 1172 1697 1770 9 1697 1524 212 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 73 1 118 1 0 5 116 0 375 3 0 319
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1429 1697 0 1465 1697 0 1779 1697 0 1736 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.7 0.0 7.0 0.1 0.0 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.7 0.0 7.0 0.1 0.0 6.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.12
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 117 355 284 4 0 192 153 0 634 7 0 469 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.00 0.42 0.24 0.00 0.03 0.76 0.00 0.59 0.43 0.00 0.68 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 251 796 638 247 0 651 335 0 979 247 0 866 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.3 13.0 14.2 20.2 0.0 15.3 18.0 0.0 10.6 20.1 0.0 13.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.3 0.0 1.0 27.0 0.0 0.1 7.5 0.0 0.9 37.1 0.0 1.7 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.2 0.1 0.0 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 23.6 13.0 15.1 47.2 0.0 15.4 25.6 0.0 11.5 57.2 0.0 14.9 LnGrp LOS C B B D B C B E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 192 6 491 322
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.4 20.7 14.8 15.3
Approach LOS B C B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.2 19.3 4.1 13.0 7.6 15.9 6.8 10.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.9 22.3 5.9 18.1 8.0 20.2 6.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 9.0 2.0 4.9 4.7 8.7 3.7 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.3 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 15.7
HCM 7th LOS B
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 73 1 147 1 5 116 375 3 329
v/c Ratio 0.27 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.02 0.37 0.34 0.01 0.42
Control Delay (s/veh) 22.8 19.0 8.2 22.0 15.2 23.0 9.1 21.7 14.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 22.8 19.0 8.2 22.0 15.2 23.0 9.1 21.7 14.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 0 0 0 0 24 33 1 61
Queue Length 95th (ft) #67 4 42 5 9 #102 203 9 182
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 276 823 749 254 696 345 1064 254 981 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.26 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.01 0.34 0.35 0.01 0.34 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 261 3 545 448
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 282 3 588 484
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 324 716 140 251
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 411 12 466 468
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.9 5.6 8.8 8.9
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 282 3 588 484
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 992 665 1196 1068
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.925 0.975 0.927 0.925
Flow Entry, veh/h 261 3 545 448
Cap Entry, veh/h 916 648 1107 987
V/C Ratio 0.285 0.005 0.492 0.454
Control Delay, s/veh 6.9 5.6 8.8 8.9

LOS AAAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1032
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Existing Plus Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 6.7
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 221 6 491 332
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 239 6 530 358
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 306 607 83 127
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 179 6 462 486
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.2 5.0 7.4 6.0
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 239 6 530 358
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1010 743 1268 1212
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.924 0.988 0.927 0.926
Flow Entry, veh/h 221 6 491 332
Cap Entry, veh/h 932 733 1173 1121
V/C Ratio 0.237 0.008 0.419 0.296
Control Delay, s/veh 6.2 5.0 7.4 6.0

LOS AAAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1021
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 94 138 154 186 334 53
Future Volume (veh/h) 94 138 154 186 334 53
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93
Parking Bus, Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 125 147 205 248 445 56
Peak Hour Factor 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Cap, veh/h 251 228 259 1125 637 500
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.62 0.35 0.35
Sat Flow, veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1433
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 125 147 205 248 445 56
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1433
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 3.7 4.7 2.5 8.7 1.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 3.7 4.7 2.5 8.7 1.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 251 228 259 1125 637 500
V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.65 0.79 0.22 0.70 0.11
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 742 673 345 1422 843 662
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.2 16.6 17.0 3.5 11.6 9.1
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.5 3.1 8.9 0.1 1.7 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 3.3 2.2 0.5 3.0 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.8 19.7 25.9 3.6 13.3 9.2
LnGrp LOS B B C A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 272 453 501
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.8 13.7 12.8
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.4 11.0 11.0 19.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 18.0 8.2 19.1
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 5.7 6.7 10.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.5 0.7 0.1 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 14.5
HCM 7th LOS B
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 125 184 205 248 445 71
v/c Ratio 0.39 0.43 0.67 0.20 0.66 0.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 22.0 7.2 35.5 5.0 19.9 4.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 22.0 7.2 35.5 5.0 19.9 4.5
Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 0 61 27 110 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 61 25 #123 51 167 15
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 2132 750
Turn Bay Length (ft) 590 250 150
Base Capacity (vph) 659 684 306 1268 752 627
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.19 0.27 0.67 0.20 0.59 0.11
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113 Future Volume (veh/h) 104 1 161 1 1 1 186 224 2 5 210 113 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 144 1 180 1 1 1 258 311 3 7 292 125 Peak Hour Factor 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 184 389 313 3 87 87 316 853 8 16 361 154
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.19 0.48 0.48 0.01 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1433 1697 780 780 1697 1761 17 1697 1173 502 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 144 1 180 1 0 2 258 0 314 7 0 417
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1433 1697 0 1561 1697 0 1778 1697 0 1676 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 9.1 0.0 6.9 0.3 0.0 14.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.1 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 9.1 0.0 6.9 0.3 0.0 14.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.30
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 184 389 313 3 0 174 316 0 862 16 0 515 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.00 0.57 0.37 0.00 0.01 0.82 0.00 0.36 0.45 0.00 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 436 805 647 164 0 454 709 0 1775 164 0 1134 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.0 19.0 21.7 31.0 0.0 24.6 24.3 0.0 10.0 30.7 0.0 19.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.0 0.0 1.7 66.9 0.0 0.0 5.1 0.0 0.3 19.1 0.0 3.1 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 2.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 2.4 0.2 0.0 5.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 34.0 19.0 23.4 97.9 0.0 24.6 29.4 0.0 10.3 49.7 0.0 22.9 LnGrp LOS C B C F C C B D C
Approach Vol, veh/h 325 3 572 424
Approach Delay, s/veh 28.1 49.0 18.9 23.4
Approach LOS C D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.6 35.1 4.1 18.5 15.6 24.0 10.8 11.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 62.1 6.0 28.1 26.0 42.1 16.0 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.3 8.9 2.0 9.0 11.1 16.3 7.1 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.6 0.7 2.9 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 22.7
HCM 7th LOS C
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 144 1 224 1 2 258 314 7 449
v/c Ratio 0.50 0.00 0.54 0.01 0.01 0.62 0.27 0.05 0.74
Control Delay (s/veh) 38.7 34.0 11.0 43.0 37.0 34.6 7.4 42.2 28.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 38.7 34.0 11.0 43.0 37.0 34.6 7.4 42.2 28.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 57 0 0 0 0 99 43 3 157
Queue Length 95th (ft) 133 4 26 5 7 202 127 17 273
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 411 759 733 154 438 667 1497 154 1075 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.00 0.31 0.01 0.00 0.39 0.21 0.05 0.42 Intersection Summary
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 52 92 162 287 311 94
Future Volume (veh/h) 52 92 162 287 311 94
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 80 174 309 334 82
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Cap, veh/h 193 175 225 1021 540 443
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.56 0.30 0.30
Sat Flow, veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1497
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 80 174 309 334 82
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1497
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 1.4 2.9 2.7 4.7 1.2
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 1.4 2.9 2.7 4.7 1.2
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 193 175 225 1021 540 443
V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.46 0.77 0.30 0.62 0.19
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 1026 931 535 1966 1160 951
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 12.2 12.4 12.6 3.5 9.1 7.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 1.9 5.6 0.2 1.2 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.1 1.2 0.3 1.4 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 13.0 14.3 18.2 3.7 10.2 8.0
LnGrp LOS BBBABA
Approach Vol, veh/h 136 483 416
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.7 8.9 9.8
Approach LOS B A A
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.6 8.3 7.9 13.8
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 18.0 9.2 19.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.7 3.4 4.9 6.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.9 0.3 0.2 1.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 9.9
HCM 7th LOS A
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 99 174 309 334 101
v/c Ratio 0.19 0.29 0.48 0.25 0.40 0.14
Control Delay (s/veh) 18.8 7.7 22.3 4.5 13.8 3.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 18.8 7.7 22.3 4.5 13.8 3.7
Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 0 38 29 71 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 41 32 #107 64 141 24
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 2132 750
Turn Bay Length (ft) 590 250 150
Base Capacity (vph) 768 741 400 1409 980 851
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.13 0.44 0.22 0.34 0.12
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66 Future Volume (veh/h) 80 1 201 1 1 4 216 363 2 3 270 66 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 86 1 216 1 1 4 232 390 2 3 290 71
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 114 373 299 3 42 168 295 802 4 7 389 95
Arrive On Green 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.45 0.45 0.00 0.28 0.28 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1431 1697 294 1176 1697 1770 9 1697 1374 336 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 86 1 216 1 0 5 232 0 392 3 0 361
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1431 1697 0 1470 1697 0 1779 1697 0 1710 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 7.0 0.0 8.3 0.1 0.0 10.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.7 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 7.0 0.0 8.3 0.1 0.0 10.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.20
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 114 373 299 3 0 211 295 0 806 7 0 484 V/C Ratio(X) 0.75 0.00 0.72 0.32 0.00 0.02 0.79 0.00 0.49 0.43 0.00 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 443 868 697 190 0 497 893 0 2129 190 0 1337 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.5 16.8 19.7 26.7 0.0 19.7 21.2 0.0 10.3 26.6 0.0 17.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.5 0.0 3.3 48.9 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.0 0.5 37.6 0.0 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.3 0.0 2.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 2.9 0.0 2.7 0.1 0.0 3.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 34.1 16.8 23.0 75.6 0.0 19.8 25.8 0.0 10.7 64.2 0.0 19.8 LnGrp LOS C B C E B C B E B
Approach Vol, veh/h 303 6 624 364
Approach Delay, s/veh 26.1 29.1 16.3 20.1
Approach LOS C C B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.2 29.2 4.1 16.1 13.3 20.1 7.6 12.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 64.1 6.0 26.1 28.2 41.9 14.0 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 10.3 2.0 9.5 9.0 12.3 4.7 2.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.7 0.6 2.4 0.1 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 19.7
HCM 7th LOS B
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 86 1 216 1 5 232 392 3 361
v/c Ratio 0.32 0.00 0.55 0.01 0.03 0.55 0.35 0.02 0.65
Control Delay (s/veh) 31.6 30.0 11.4 37.0 26.4 27.7 7.8 35.7 24.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 31.6 30.0 11.4 37.0 26.4 27.7 7.8 35.7 24.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 26 0 0 0 0 67 44 1 97
Queue Length 95th (ft) 103 6 70 7 13 214 215 12 293
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 431 846 787 184 492 868 1634 184 1282 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.20 0.00 0.27 0.01 0.01 0.27 0.24 0.02 0.28 Intersection Summary
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 309 453 516
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 324 475 542
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 467 131 215
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 290 660 391
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 35 35 35
Ped Cap Adj 0.995 0.995 0.995
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.0 7.2 9.2
Approach LOS A A A
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LR LT TR
Assumed Moves LR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 324 475 542
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 857 1207 1108
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.954 0.953 0.952
Flow Entry, veh/h 309 453 516
Cap Entry, veh/h 813 1145 1049
V/C Ratio 0.380 0.395 0.491
Control Delay, s/veh 9.0 7.2 9.2

LOS AAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 2 3
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.3
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 369 3 572 456
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 399 3 618 493
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 324 771 165 281
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 450 12 558 493
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.6 5.9 9.7 9.5
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 399 3 618 493
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 992 629 1166 1036
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.925 0.975 0.926 0.924
Flow Entry, veh/h 369 3 572 456
Cap Entry, veh/h 916 612 1078 956
V/C Ratio 0.403 0.005 0.531 0.477
Control Delay, s/veh 8.6 5.9 9.7 9.5

LOS AAAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 2033
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 6.9
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 155 483 435
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 163 507 457
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 351 59 183
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 289 455 383
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 5.6 6.7 7.5
Approach LOS A A A
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LR LT TR
Assumed Moves LR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 163 507 457
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 965 1299 1145
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.951 0.952 0.952
Flow Entry, veh/h 155 483 435
Cap Entry, veh/h 916 1235 1089
V/C Ratio 0.169 0.391 0.400
Control Delay, s/veh 5.6 6.7 7.5

LOS AAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1 2 2
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Near-Term With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.4
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 303 6 624 364
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 327 6 674 393
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 317 765 97 253
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 329 6 547 518
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 7.4 5.9 9.4 7.6
Approach LOS AAAA
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 327 6 674 393
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 999 632 1250 1066
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.926 0.988 0.926 0.926
Flow Entry, veh/h 303 6 624 364
Cap Entry, veh/h 924 624 1155 986
V/C Ratio 0.328 0.010 0.540 0.369
Control Delay, s/veh 7.4 5.9 9.4 7.6

LOS AAAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1032
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 101 165 190 262 412 61
Future Volume (veh/h) 101 165 190 262 412 61
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93
Parking Bus, Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 115 151 216 298 468 55
Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Cap, veh/h 254 230 273 1119 654 514
Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.61 0.36 0.36
Sat Flow, veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1435
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 115 151 216 298 468 55
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1435
Q Serve(g_s), s 2.5 3.8 4.9 3.1 9.1 1.1
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.5 3.8 4.9 3.1 9.1 1.1
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 254 230 273 1119 654 514
V/C Ratio(X) 0.45 0.66 0.79 0.27 0.72 0.11
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 747 678 381 1431 853 670
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.0 16.5 16.7 3.7 11.4 8.8
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.3 3.1 7.5 0.1 2.0 0.1
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 3.4 2.2 0.6 3.2 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 17.2 19.6 24.2 3.8 13.4 8.9
LnGrp LOS B B C A B A
Approach Vol, veh/h 266 514 523
Approach Delay, s/veh 18.6 12.4 12.9
Approach LOS B B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 30.1 11.0 10.4 19.6
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 18.0 9.0 19.2
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.1 5.8 6.9 11.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 1.8 0.6 0.1 2.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 13.8
HCM 7th LOS B
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 188 216 298 468 69
v/c Ratio 0.37 0.45 0.65 0.24 0.67 0.12
Control Delay (s/veh) 21.9 7.4 32.9 5.0 20.2 4.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 21.9 7.4 32.9 5.0 20.2 4.4
Queue Length 50th (ft) 32 0 64 32 116 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 69 40 #160 73 #235 20
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 2132 750
Turn Bay Length (ft) 590 250 150
Base Capacity (vph) 657 685 335 1263 753 627
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.27 0.64 0.24 0.62 0.11
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139 Future Volume (veh/h) 125 1 177 1 1 1 223 278 2 5 315 139 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 1 201 1 1 1 253 316 2 6 358 158 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 179 369 296 2 80 80 303 944 6 13 422 186
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.53 0.53 0.01 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1431 1697 778 778 1697 1768 11 1697 1162 513 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 1 201 1 0 2 253 0 318 6 0 516
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1431 1697 0 1556 1697 0 1779 1697 0 1675 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.8 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.2 0.0 7.2 0.3 0.0 20.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.8 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.2 0.0 7.2 0.3 0.0 20.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.31
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 179 369 296 2 0 160 303 0 950 13 0 608 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.68 0.42 0.00 0.01 0.83 0.00 0.33 0.45 0.00 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 358 678 545 143 0 396 572 0 1577 143 0 1061 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.1 22.4 26.0 35.5 0.0 28.7 28.2 0.0 9.4 35.2 0.0 20.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.6 0.0 2.7 88.2 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.2 21.9 0.0 3.4 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 0.0 3.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 2.5 0.2 0.0 7.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 38.7 22.4 28.8 123.7 0.0 28.7 34.2 0.0 9.6 57.1 0.0 24.3 LnGrp LOS D C C F C C A E C
Approach Vol, veh/h 344 3 571 522
Approach Delay, s/veh 32.9 60.4 20.5 24.7
Approach LOS C E C C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.6 42.9 4.1 19.6 16.7 30.7 11.5 12.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 63.1 6.0 27.1 24.0 45.1 15.0 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.3 9.2 2.0 11.2 12.2 22.2 7.8 2.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.6 0.6 3.6 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 25.1
HCM 7th LOS C
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 1 201 1 2 253 318 6 516
v/c Ratio 0.52 0.00 0.52 0.01 0.02 0.63 0.27 0.04 0.77
Control Delay (s/veh) 41.9 36.0 11.4 44.0 38.0 37.4 7.0 43.6 29.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 41.9 36.0 11.4 44.0 38.0 37.4 7.0 43.6 29.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 0 0 1 1 113 46 3 205
Queue Length 95th (ft) 167 6 66 6 9 261 164 19 427
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 355 675 663 142 404 568 1457 142 1069 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.00 0.30 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.22 0.04 0.48 Intersection Summary
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 110 206 353 385 100
Future Volume (veh/h) 57 110 206 353 385 100
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97
Parking Bus, Adj 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826 1826
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 61 94 222 380 414 84
Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 5 5 5 5 5
Cap, veh/h 191 174 286 1101 589 483
Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.16 0.60 0.32 0.32
Sat Flow, veh/h 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1498
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 61 94 222 380 414 84
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1704 1547 1739 1826 1826 1498
Q Serve(g_s), s 1.1 2.0 4.2 3.6 6.8 1.4
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.1 2.0 4.2 3.6 6.8 1.4
Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 191 174 286 1101 589 483
V/C Ratio(X) 0.32 0.54 0.78 0.35 0.70 0.17
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 891 809 505 1708 966 792
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.1 14.4 13.8 3.4 10.2 8.4
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 2.6 4.5 0.2 1.5 0.2
Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.1 1.7 0.5 2.2 0.3
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 15.0 17.0 18.3 3.6 11.8 8.5
LnGrp LOS BBBABA
Approach Vol, veh/h 155 602 498
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.2 9.0 11.2
Approach LOS B A B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.7 8.8 9.7 16.0
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.2 18.0 10.0 18.2
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.6 4.0 6.2 8.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 2.4 0.3 0.2 2.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 10.8
HCM 7th LOS B
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Group Flow (vph) 61 118 222 380 414 108
v/c Ratio 0.24 0.36 0.63 0.30 0.58 0.17
Control Delay (s/veh) 20.5 8.2 28.3 4.6 17.0 3.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 20.5 8.2 28.3 4.6 17.0 3.9
Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 0 59 38 96 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) 43 35 #149 83 188 25
Internal Link Dist (ft) 598 2132 750
Turn Bay Length (ft) 590
Base Capacity (vph) 653 657 370 1332 759 687
Starvation Cap Reductn 000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.09 0.18 0.60 0.29 0.55 0.16
Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Signalized Intersection Summary 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106 Future Volume (veh/h) 126 1 235 1 1 4 242 448 2 3 376 106 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width Adj. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 1781 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 135 1 202 1 1 4 260 482 2 3 404 114 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
Cap, veh/h 171 361 290 2 30 120 311 956 4 7 478 135
Arrive On Green 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1697 1781 1430 1697 289 1158 1697 1772 7 1697 1329 375 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 135 1 202 1 0 5 260 0 484 3 0 518
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1697 1781 1430 1697 0 1447 1697 0 1780 1697 0 1703 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.5 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 10.4 0.0 12.1 0.1 0.0 19.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.5 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 10.4 0.0 12.1 0.1 0.0 19.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.22
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 171 361 290 2 0 150 311 0 960 7 0 613 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.00 0.70 0.42 0.00 0.03 0.84 0.00 0.50 0.44 0.00 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 337 660 529 144 0 372 582 0 1618 144 0 1109 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 31.0 22.4 26.1 35.2 0.0 28.4 27.8 0.0 10.3 35.0 0.0 20.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.9 0.0 3.0 86.4 0.0 0.1 5.9 0.0 0.4 38.2 0.0 3.3 Initial Q Delay(d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 0.0 3.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 4.5 0.0 4.2 0.1 0.0 7.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d), s/veh 38.9 22.4 29.1 121.6 0.0 28.5 33.6 0.0 10.7 73.2 0.0 24.0 LnGrp LOS D C C F C C B E C
Approach Vol, veh/h 338 6 744 521
Approach Delay, s/veh 33.0 44.0 18.7 24.3
Approach LOS C D B C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.3 42.9 4.1 19.2 16.9 30.3 11.1 12.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.0 4.9 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.0 64.1 6.0 26.1 24.2 45.9 14.0 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 14.1 2.0 11.2 12.4 21.7 7.5 2.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.6 0.6 3.7 0.2 0.0 Intersection Summary
HCM 7th Control Delay, s/veh 23.6
HCM 7th LOS C
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved Queues 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Group Flow (vph) 135 1 253 1 5 260 484 3 518
v/c Ratio 0.51 0.00 0.59 0.01 0.04 0.64 0.41 0.02 0.78
Control Delay (s/veh) 42.5 36.0 11.8 44.0 30.8 37.1 8.2 44.0 30.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay (s/veh) 42.5 36.0 11.8 44.0 30.8 37.1 8.2 44.0 30.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 61 0 0 1 1 114 78 1 208
Queue Length 95th (ft) #177 6 81 7 14 #283 282 12 451
Internal Link Dist (ft) 2687 198 814 946
Turn Bay Length (ft) 140 500
Base Capacity (vph) 332 653 680 142 380 575 1474 142 1107 Starvation Cap Reductn 000000000
Spillback Cap Reductn 000000000
Storage Cap Reductn 000000000
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.00 0.37 0.01 0.01 0.45 0.33 0.02 0.47 Intersection Summary
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer.

Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.9
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 303 514 537
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 318 540 563
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 491 121 227
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 299 688 434
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 35 35 35
Ped Cap Adj 0.995 0.995 0.995
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.2 7.8 9.7
Approach LOS A A A
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LR LT TR
Assumed Moves LR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 318 540 563
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 836 1220 1095
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.953 0.952 0.953
Flow Entry, veh/h 303 514 537
Cap Entry, veh/h 793 1156 1038
V/C Ratio 0.382 0.445 0.517
Control Delay, s/veh 9.2 7.8 9.7

LOS AAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 2 3
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-AM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.9
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 344 3 571 522
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 371 3 616 564
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 394 767 160 275
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 445 9 605 495
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.0 5.9 9.6 10.8
Approach LOS AAAB
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 371 3 616 564
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 923 631 1172 1042
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.927 0.975 0.927 0.926
Flow Entry, veh/h 344 3 571 522
Cap Entry, veh/h 855 615 1084 964
V/C Ratio 0.402 0.005 0.526 0.542
Control Delay, s/veh 9.0 5.9 9.6 10.8

LOS AAAB
95th %tile Queue, veh 2033
3: Derrick Ave (SR-33) & Smoot Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.5
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 179 602 522
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 188 632 548
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 435 64 233
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 346 559 463
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 6.5 8.2 9.5
Approach LOS A A A
Lane Left Left Left
Designated Moves LR LT TR
Assumed Moves LR LT TR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 188 632 548
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 885 1293 1088
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.952 0.953 0.953
Flow Entry, veh/h 179 602 522
Cap Entry, veh/h 842 1230 1036
V/C Ratio 0.213 0.490 0.504
Control Delay, s/veh 6.5 8.2 9.5

LOS AAA
95th %tile Queue, veh 1 3 3
6: SR-180 (Oller St) & Belmont Ave Cumulative (Year 2047) With Project-PM-Improved HCM 7th Roundabout 02/13/2026
Synchro 12 Report
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.0
Intersection LOS B
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 389 6 744 521
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 420 6 804 562
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 440 948 150 283
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 405 6 710 671
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 10 10 10 10
Ped Cap Adj 0.999 1.000 0.999 0.999
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.8 7.1 13.4 10.9
Approach LOS BABB
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
A (Intercept) 1380 1380 1380 1380
B (Slope) 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3 1.02e-3
Entry Flow, veh/h 420 6 804 562
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 881 525 1184 1034
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.926 0.988 0.926 0.927
Flow Entry, veh/h 389 6 744 521
Cap Entry, veh/h 815 518 1095 957
V/C Ratio 0.477 0.011 0.680 0.544
Control Delay, s/veh 10.8 7.1 13.4 10.9

LOS BABB
95th %tile Queue, veh 3063
TRAFFIC STUDY – PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

APPENDIX F

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ANALYSIS
Tool Version: Report Date: 6/8/2026
Name:

Jurisdiction
TAZ ID
Single-family: 271 DU Multi-family: 0 DU
Total: 271 DU Percent Affordable: 0 %
Non-Residential Office: 0 EMP Others: TSF
Included
in the project TDM Quantification
% VMT/Capita
Reduction
% VMT/Employment
Reduction
No N/A
No N/A

10.3 County VMT / Capita: 16.1
Significant Impact: No

11.5 County VMT / Employee: 25.7
Significant Impact: No
Project VMT per Capita with TDM
Measures:

Significant Impact with
TDM measures:

11.5 No
Project's VMT/Employee (11.5) is less than County's VMT/Employee (22.4 using 13% as threshold) Project VMT per Employee:

Project VMT Results
Residential
Project's VMT/Capita (10.3) is less than County VMT/Capita (14.0 using 13% as threshold) Project VMT per Capita:

Office
Project VMT per Capita with TDM
Measures:

10.3 Significant Impact with
TDM measures: No
Project TDM measures (VMT reduction strategies)
Fresno COG Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis Tool Summary Report Version 1.38
Project Information
Crown Homes
Mendota
1701
Project Land Use
Residential
TDM Strategy
Implement Project Specific Vanpool Program
Implement Project Specific Carpool Program

12.9 10.3 10.3

13.2 16.1
0 5
10 15
20 25
30 35
TAZ Project Project + TDM
VMT per Capita
County Average

11.5 11.5 11.5

25.7 0
5 10
15 20
25 30
35 40
TAZ Project Project + TDM
VMT per Employee
County Average
Attachment 8: Resolution No. 26-71
1 BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE

CITY OF MENDOTA, COUNTY OF FRESNO
RESOLUTION NO. 26-71

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA IN THE MATTER OF THE TRACT NO. 6541 PROJECT, ADOPTING AN INITIAL

STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTIONS 15070 THROUGH 15075 AND APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN

AMENDMENT, A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, A VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, AND INITIATING THE ANNEXATION OF ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 012-190-25ST AND 012-160-25ST
WHEREAS, Yamabe & Horn Engineering (Applicant), on behalf of Crown Homes, has submitted an application for the Tract No. 6541 Project (“Project”) which includes a request for approval of a General Plan Amendment (“GPA”), a prezone, a Planned Development, a Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (“VTSM”) proposing 271 single family residential lots, and initiation of the annexation of Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APN) 012- 190-25ST and 012-160-25ST (“Project site”); and
WHEREAS, the Project site is 53.43 acres in size, and consists of a portion of APN 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST; and
WHEREAS, APN 012-190-25ST is currently designated Low Density Residential by the City of Mendota’s (“City”) General Plan and the portion of this APN within the Project site’s boundaries would be amended to the Medium Density Residential land use and would be prezoned to the R-1 (Single Family/Medium Density Residential) zone district; and
WHEREAS, APN 012-160-25ST is designated Public Facility by the City’s General Plan and the portion of the Project site on this APN would be prezoned P-F (Public Facilities); and
WHEREAS, the Project would result in the subdivision of the Project site into 271 single-family residential lots, an approximately 4.21 acre storm drainage basin, and would result in the construction and improvement of public facilities to serve the Project; and WHEREAS, the Project would be developed as a Planned Development in order to be granted flexibility from the ordinary development standards of the R-1 zone district; and
WHEREAS, the Project meets all applicable City Standards and requirements, as conditioned, and would be developed within the density range prescribed by the Medium Density Residential land use; and
2 WHEREAS, the Project site is located outside of the City’s current Sphere of Influence (“SOI”) boundary and proposes that the portions of APN 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST included in the Project site be annexed to the City of Mendota once the previously initiated amendment of the City’s SOI has been completed; and WHEREAS, the City of Mendota desires to initiate proceedings, pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, Division 3, commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56654 provides that “[a] proposal for a change of organization or a reorganization may be made by the adoption of a resolution of application by the legislative body of an affected local agency ….[;]” and WHEREAS, the specific change in organization requested consists of an annexation to the City of Mendota and detachment from the Fresno County Fire Protection District and the Silver Creek Drainage District, and; WHEREAS, the proposed annexation area will be consistent with the SOI of the City of Mendota and adjacent to Mendota City Limits once, and if, the previously initiated amendment of the City’s SOI is approved; and
WHEREAS, the City has an agreement with the County of Fresno to comply with Revenue and Tax Code Section 99 regarding property tax revenue transfer upon annexation, which memorandum of understanding includes standards of annexations; and
WHEREAS, the City does not propose any specific term and conditions for the proposed reorganization; and
WHEREAS, all prerequisites for the initiation of proceedings, pursuant to the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, have been met; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared an Initial Study to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the Project and has found that based on the analysis contained in the Initial Study, the Project would not result in significant adverse environmental effects with the implementation of mitigation measures, and accordingly, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines section 15070-15075; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on September 22, 2026, the Mendota Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered the Tract No. 6541 Project and adopted Resolution No. PC 26-04, recommending that the City Council approve the Tract No. 6541 Project; and
WHEREAS, at a regular meeting on October 6, 2026, the Mendota City Council considered the Tract No. 6541 Project; and
3 WHEREAS, notice of said public hearing was published in the September 25, 2026, edition of The Business Journal, posted at City Hall and the City’s website, sent to property owners within 300 feet of the subject site via US Mail, and sent to interested parties via email; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, has reviewed and considered the staff report, Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all evidence presented at the City Council’s meeting on October 6, 2026, including oral and written public testimony on the project and the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and which is herein incorporated by reference.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mendota hereby takes the following actions:

1. Adopts the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration determining that the Project would not result insignificant adverse effects on the environment pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act.

2. Adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the mitigation monitoring and reporting program set forth in Exhibit “B”, including the mitigation measures identified therein and as described in the Mitigated Negative Declaration.

3. Approves a General Plan Amendment, amending the portion of APN 012-190- 25ST included in the Project site’s boundary to the Medium Density Residential land use designation.

4. Makes the following findings related to the Project’s Planned Development, pursuant Mendota Municipal Code Section 17.84.050:
a. The proposed planned development is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific or community plan, including the density and intensity limitations that may apply.
b. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the development being proposed.
c. Adequate transportation facilities, utilities, and public services exist or will be provided in accordance with the approval of the planned development to serve the proposed development, and approval of the planned development will not result in adverse impacts to existing facilities, utilities, or services so as to be a detriment to the public health, safety, or welfare. d. The proposed development will not have a substantial adverse impact on surrounding land uses, and will be compatible with the existing and planned land use character of the surrounding area.
e. The proposed development generally complies with any adopted design guidelines.
f. The proposed development is demonstrably superior to the development that could occur utilizing the standards applicable to the subject zone 4 district, and will achieve superior community design, environmental preservation, and/or substantial public benefit. In making this determination, factors to be considered shall include, but not be limited to:
i. Appropriateness of the use(s) at the proposed location; ii. The mix of uses, housing types, and housing price levels; iii. Provision of infrastructure improvements;
iv. Provision of usable active or passive open space;
v. Compatibility of uses within the planned development area; vi. Creativity in design and use of land;
vii. Quality of design, and adequacy of light and air into the interior spaces of buildings; and
viii. Overall enhancement of neighborhood character and the built and natural environments of the city

5. Makes the following findings, pursuant to government Code Section 66474 for the Project’s VTSM:
a. The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.
b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.
c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development. d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. e. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure a fish or wildlife habitat.
f. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.
g. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

6. Finds annexation of the portions of Assessor’s Parcel Number 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST included in the Project site, is hereby adopted and approved by the City Council of the City of Mendota, and the Local Agency Formation Commission of Fresno County is hereby requested to initiate proceedings for the change of organization/ reorganization of territory as illustrated in Exhibit “C” hereto in the manner provided by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000.

7. Initiates annexation of the portions of Assessor’s Parcel Number 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST included in the Project site, as shown in Exhibit “C”, directing the Planning Director (or designee) to prepare and transmit the Annexation Proposal for the Tract No. 6541 Project to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Fresno County.
5 8. Requires the Applicant to prepare all necessary exhibits and pay for all fees related to the annexation of the Project site.

9. Making the findings necessary for approval of the Project could not be made without the conditions of approval set forth in “Exhibit A” to this Resolution.

10.The bases for these findings are detailed in the October 6, 2026, staff report, the entire Administrative Record, as well as the evidence and comments presented during the public hearing which are hereby incorporated by reference ______________________________
Victor Martinez, Mayor
ATTEST:

I, Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk of the City of Mendota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted and passed by the City Council at a regular meeting of the City Council held at Mendota City Council Chambers located at 725 Riofrio Street, Mendota, California 93640, on the 6th day of October, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Celeste Cabrera-Garcia, City Clerk
“Exhibit A” TO RESOLUTION NO. 26-71

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tract No. 6541 Project; APN 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST As may be used herein, the words “Applicant”, “owner,” “operator”, and “developer” shall be interchangeable, excepting when the word is indicated in bold italics. In that event, the condition of approval is specific to the entity named.

General

1. All conditions of approval shall be the sole financial responsibility of the Applicant/owner, except where specified in the conditions of approval listed herein or mandated by statutes.

2. The Applicant shall submit to the City of Mendota Planning and Building Department a check in the amount necessary to file a Notice of Determination at the Fresno County Clerk. This amount shall equal the Fresno County filing fee and California Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fee in effect at the time of filing.

Such check shall be made payable to the Fresno County Clerk and submitted no later than three (3) days following action on the Tract No. 6541 Project.

3. Approval of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map (VTSM) No. 6541 shall be valid for a period not to exceed 24 months from the date of approval. Prior to expiration of the approved tentative map an extension or extensions to this period may be requested pursuant to Section 66453.3 of the Subdivision Map Act.

4. Development shall comply with all applicable provisions of the City of Mendota General Plan and the Mendota Municipal Code (MMC), including but not limited to: potable water protection regulations (Chapter 13.30), business licensing requirements (Title 5), and Building Code Standards (Title 15); the Subdivision Ordinance (Title 16); the regulations of the applicable zone district(s) and other relevant portions of the Zoning Ordinance (Title 17); and the City of Mendota Standard Specifications and Standard Drawings, unless exceptions therefrom are approved by the City Engineer.

5. Approval of VTSM No. 6541 shall be considered null and void in the event of failure by the Applicant and/or the authorized representative, engineer, or surveyor to disclose and delineate all facts and information relating to the subject property, and the proposed use.

6. Development of the Project site shall be in substantial conformance with the plans approved by the Approval Authority and the subject conditions contained herein.

Minor modifications to the approved plans necessary to meet regulatory, engineering, or similar constraints may be made at the discretion of the City Planner and City Engineer without amendment to VTSM No. 6541.

7. Use of the site shall conform to all applicable requirements for the R-1 and P-F zone district, where prezoned as such, and unless modified by the project’s Planned Development.

8. The Project’s final map shall reflect the comments contained on the “Redlined VTSM”, attached hereto as “Attachment 1”.

9. Any proposed signs are subject to review and approval by the City Planner by means of a separate Sign Review process.

10. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner, operator, and/or management to ensure that any required permits, inspections, and approvals from any regulatory agency be obtained from the applicable agency prior to issuance of a building permit and/or the issuance of a certificate of completion, as determined appropriate by the City of Mendota Planning and Building Department.

11. All conditions shall be satisfied prior to occupancy approval for any portion of the Project. Failure to comply with all conditions of approval shall be grounds for the imposition of penalties, suspension of the permit, modification of the permit, or revocation of the permit.

12. The City will monitor the operation for violations of conditions of approval. Penalty for violation may include but is not limited to warnings, fines, and/or permit revocation.

13. The operator shall keep the exterior premises free of trash and debris. Graffiti shall be removed or covered within 48 hours of its discovery by the Applicant.

14. Approval of VTSM No. 6541 is not an authorization to commence construction.

Construction drawings (building and improvement plans; site, grading, irrigation, and landscaping, as applicable) shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department and City Engineer for review and approval. A building permit shall be acquired prior to start of any construction activities.

15. The contractor and any subcontractor(s) shall acquire a City of Mendota business license, including payment of any applicable business license fees, prior to commencing construction.

16. No use shall be permitted, and no process, equipment or materials shall be used that are found by the City to be objectionable to persons living or working in the vicinity by reasons of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders, dirt, refuse, water-carried waste, noise, vibration, illumination, glare, or unsightliness or to involve any hazard of fire or explosion.

17. The Applicant shall pay all fees as required by existing ordinances and schedules.

The fees to be paid shall be those in effect at the time of payment.

18. New mechanical and electrical equipment shall be screened from view.

19. The Applicant shall at all times hold all required permits and approvals from local, State, and federal agencies.

20. All water wells and septic systems existing on the property shall be abandoned to County, City, and State standards.

21. As many energy-conserving features as possible shall be included in the Project.

Examples include, but are not limited to, increased wall and ceiling insulation, EPAcertified fireplace inserts and/or wood stoves or natural gas fireplaces, electrical and natural gas outlets installed around the exterior of the units to encourage use of electric yard maintenance equipment and gas-fired barbeques, and each home wired for computers/internet and electronic meter reading.

22. The developer shall provide concrete pads and walkways within the side yards adjacent to garages for the placement of trash/recycling containers behind the rear yard fences/gates. All trash/recycling containers shall be placed out of public view except on the days of collection. The developer shall disclose this requirement to the future homeowners within the subdivision.

23. The Applicant is required to prepare and provide all necessary exhibits and pay for all fees related to annexation of the Project site.

24. Prior to the Project’s final map being considered by the City Council. A Zoning Text Amendment removing the requirement for a minimum of 10% of the site of a Planned Development to be developed with open space must be adopted.

25. The Project shall implement all mitigation measures included in the mitigation, monitoring, and reporting program attached to the Project’s Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Lighting

26. All lighting shall be hooded and directed to not shine towards adjacent properties, public streets, and homes developed as a part of VTSM No. 6541. Lighting shall be approved by the City Engineer.

27. The Applicant shall provide a lighting plan for the review and approval of the City Engineer.

Landscaping

28. Street Tress shall be provided as required by the City’s Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, and as required by the City’s Public Works Standards.

29. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer for the areas along the public right of way.

Construction

30. All above-ground features including but not limited to lighting, fire hydrants, postal boxes, electrical and related boxes, and backflow devices shall be installed outside of the public-right-of-way. All new utilities shall be installed underground.

31. Hours of construction shall be limited to 6:00 AM to 7:00 PM, Monday through Saturday.

32. Construction debris shall be contained within an on-site trash bin and the Project site shall be watered for dust control during construction.

33. Any non-structural fencing shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Department consistent with Standard Drawing Nos. M-3 through M7.

34. The Applicant and contractor shall comply with all relevant components of the California Building Code and associated trade codes.

35. All signage must be approved pursuant to the standards and guidelines of the MMC prior to installation.

36. Development shall at all times respect existing or new easements by, for, and between all private and public entities, including but not limited to the City of Mendota.

37. It shall be the responsibility of the Applicant to grant/secure easements as necessary for the installation and maintenance of private utilities, including but not limited to electricity, gas, telephone, and cable television.

Engineering

38. All proposals of the Applicant shall be conditions of approval, except as further modified below, and subject to modifications to conform to applicable City Standards.

39. Crosswalks shall be provided to ensure pedestrian safety in areas determined by the City Engineer, Public Works Director and Planning Director and these crosswalks shall be decorative such thermoplastic pavement striping and/or stamped and colored concrete.

40. The developer shall pay the equitable fair share cost of future improvements to the roadways/intersections identified in Table 10 of the Project’s Traffic Study. The improvements that these equitable fair share costs shall be based off of will be those recommended within Section 16.4 of the Traffic Study.

41. Street pavement section shall be a minimum structural section as indicated in City Standard drawings and verified by a Project soils report

42. Traffic and street signs shall be installed by the Applicant in accordance with City requirements

43. The developer shall construct Amador Avenue in front of the Project site’s frontage to Belmont Avenue. The newly constructed street shall include a minimum of two travel lanes of at least 11 feet in width. Any costs for this extension in excess of the Project’s contribution would be reimbursed to the developer through a fair share reimbursement agreement entered into with the City.

44. Any work within the City of Mendota right-of-way shall require an encroachment permit.

45. A Grading and Site Improvement Plan for the proposed improvements shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. The Applicant shall obtain a Grading and Site Improvement Permit once plans are approved.

46. The proposed water system shall be tested and accepted by the City of Mendota Public Works Department. Each lot shall be equipped a water meter/box meeting City standards.

47. All interior water mains shall be an 8-inch water main and shall connect to the existing main in Amador Avenue.

48. All interior sewer mains shall be an 8-inch sewer main and shall connect to the existing main in Amador Avenue.

49. Two water sample stations shall be installed within the subdivision at the locations specified by the Public Works Director.

50. In order to accommodate for the capture of wastewater volumes associated with the Project in excess of the current disposal capacity at the City’s wastewater facility, construction of a formal disposal pond or the installation of mechanical evaporators shall be required. These improvements are in addition to the new sewer main piping and manholes that will extend the existing Westside Sewer Interceptor. Construction of the new sewer main piping and manholes extending the Westside Sewer Interceptor shall be completed prior to any portion of the Project being granted occupancy. Construction of improvements to increase the disposal capacity at the City’s wastewater facility may be deferred to allow 25% of the proposed units to be granted occupancy before completion of the improvements. The remaining 75% of the proposed units shall be granted occupancy only after completion of the required improvements at the City’s wastewater facility. Upgrades to the City’s wastewater disposal facilities shall be based on a fair share percentage of the improvements as determined by the City Engineer at the time of Final Map consideration by the City Council and as dictated in the Project’s Subdivision Agreement.

51. All new electric, cable TV, telephone, internet, etc. services provided to the development shall be underground.

52. The Applicant shall provide a street light plan for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the improvement plans and prior to the start of construction. Streetlights shall be provided by the Developer and maintained by the City pursuant to PG&E rate schedule LS2C.

53. The Applicant shall work with PG&E for the preparation of a utility plan, subject to the review and approval by the City Engineer prior to approval of the improvement plans and prior to the start of construction. All work shall be completed such that no street surface need be reopened for service.

54. The developer shall provide traffic calming measures throughout the subdivision that ensure that impacts related to speeding on internal streets do not result from the proposed circulation pattern. Traffic calming measures shall be proposed by the developer and must be deemed acceptable by the City Engineer.

Final Map

55. The Applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City if the Final Map is approved prior to completion and acceptance of the public improvements.

56. A right-to-farm covenant shall be recorded prior to recordation of the Final Map.

57. Street names shall be verified by City staff prior to finalizing the final map.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

58. The Applicant shall consult with and shall comply with the requirements of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, including but not limited to compliance with Regulation VIII (Fugitive PM10 Prohibitions) and Rule 9510 (Indirect Source Review).

Fire

59. The Applicant shall consult with and shall comply with the requirements of the Fresno County Fire Protection District/CAL FIRE, including but not limited to requirements related to sprinklers, fire hydrants, and fire access.

Cultural Resources

60. The developer shall comply with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Sections 5097.98 and 21083.2 and related statutes regarding regulation of cultural and historical resources that may be discovered on the site.

Impact Fees

61. The Applicant is responsible for payment of fees to the Mendota Unified School District and shall provide the City with evidence of payment, or evidence of the District’s determination that no payment is required, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

62. The Applicant is responsible for payment of Fresno County Regional Transportation Mitigation Fees and shall provide the City with evidence of payment, or evidence of the County’s determination that no payment is required, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.

63. All fees in effect at the time this application was deemed complete shall be applied to the development of this subdivision.

Other

64. Approval of this Project is for the benefit of the Applicant. The submittal of applications by Applicant for this Project was a voluntary act on the part of the Applicant not required by the City. Therefore, as a condition of approval of this Project, the Applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Mendota and its agents, officers, consultants, independent contractors and employees (“City”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval by the City concerning the Project, including any challenges to associated environmental review, and for any and all costs, attorneys fees, and damages arising therefrom (collectively “Claim”).

The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any Claim or if the City fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

Nothing in this condition shall obligate the City to defend any Claim and the City shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement arising from any such Claim not defended by the City, unless the City approves the settlement in writing. Nor shall the City be prohibited from independently defending any Claim, and if the City does decide to independently defend a Claim, the Applicant shall be responsible for City’s attorneys’ fees, expenses of litigation and costs for that independent defense, including the costs of preparing any required administrative record.

Should the City decide to independently defend any Claim, the Applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement arising from any such Claim unless the Applicant approves the settlement.
“ATTACHMENT 1” – REDLINED VTSM
52' R/W LOCAL STREET SECTION 56' R/W LOCAL STREET SECTION 84' R/W COLLECTOR STREET SECTION Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

Ch. By: Date: Scale: As Noted YH Job No. Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Jennifer Proctor Plot Date: 10/28/2025 File Location: F:\2025\25-142\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\25-142_TTM_SHEET 1.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM JRJ/JP AB 10/27/25 25-142 1 3
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6541
NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELMONT AVENUE AND STATE ROUTE 33 EXISTING TREES EXISTING BUILDINGS EXISTING USE EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED USE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE PROPOSED ZONING SOURCE OF WATER SOURCE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL SOURCE OF ELECTRICITY SOURCE OF GAS SOURCE OF CABLE T.V. SOURCE OF TELEPHONE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER SITE AREA SITE ADDRESS VICINITY MAP: SITE LOCATION PREPARED BY: LOT INFO:
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
”
” LEGAL DESCRIPTION: OWNER: NOTES: SUBDIVIDER: SITE INFORMATION: NOTES:

APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 012-160-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) A-A BELMONT AVENUE AMADOR
AVENUE

ALIGNMENT
APN: 012-190-26ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) APN: 019-050-09S MOUNT OLIVE LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
APN: 012-160-41S CIRCLE H FARMS LLC

EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY)
APN: 012-160-23S CARLOS & ROMELIA NUNEZ EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY
SEE SHEET 2
SEE SHEET 3
APN: 012-190-25ST WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT EX ZONING: AE-20(COUNTY) Note acreage foreach portion
Existing GPLU designation is Low DensityResidential (FRESNO COUNTY) Planned Developments in the R-1District require at least 10% of thesite to be developed with openspace (MMC Section 17.84.030(B)) Use Gross Acreage.Update density asnecessary.

Unincorporated area in the County of Fresno
Unincorporated area in the County of Fresno
Fix formatting Remove and keep
note 7. Fix formatting
Except where approved otherwise as proposed underthe Planned Development General note that the map does not includea mention of phasing. If phased development is desired, then it must be noted on themap.

Use City Standard ST-3w/ standard sidewalkpattern with parkway strip Use City Standard ST-3Awith standard sidewalkpattern with parkway strip Include water line inlegend
Different symbolsused on map
Acronyms not usedon map (SDDIF.C.R.) 6' EX. 8" WATER MAIN 28' PROPOSED 12" WESTSIDE SEWER INTERCEPTOR note to Y&H: this is where it iscurrently laid out, but with thisstreet cross-section, I am going tohave it shifted 7' to the east to be5' off the face of curb in the SBtravel lane add jog symbols tothese segments, too
(STORM DRAIN BASIN) (RESDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT)
(A PORTION OF APN 012-190-25ST) (A PORTION OF APN 012-160-25ST) OTHER FLOOD AREAS: AREA SOF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCEFLOOD; AREAS OF 1% ANNUALCHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGEDEPTHS OF LESS THAN ONEFOOT; AND AREAS PROTECTEDBY LEVEES FROM 1% ANNUALCHANCE FLOOD 06019C1444HEFFECTIVE02/18/2009
This isn't a great descriptor ofthe project's location. Howabout:West of Amador Avenue, 3,660ft North of Belmont Avenue show dim of this line
point out sectioncorner

PROPOSED STORMDRAIN
add notation or other indicationthat Amador Avenue will beextended with two paved travellanes (min. 11' wide) to BelmontAvenue and that easement fromWWD will allow use as publicstreet BASIN PTR legal for Parcel One (Parcel 2 on this map) is incorrect 2 5,025 S.F.
5 5,025 S.F.
6 5,035 S.F.
7 5,025 S.F.
8 6,231 S.F. 165 6,333 S.F. 166 6,229 S.F. 167 5,023 S.F. 168 5,023 S.F. 169 5,023 S.F. 170 5,023 S.F. 171 5,023 S.F. 172 5,023 S.F. 174 5,023 S.F. 173 5,023 S.F. 175 5,023 S.F. 176 5,023 S.F. 177 5,023 S.F. 178 5,023 S.F. 179 5,023 S.F. 180 5,023 S.F. 181 6,229 S.F. 182 5,315 S.F. 163 6,231 S.F. 164 5,828 S.F. 200 6,069 S.F. 199 6,233 S.F. 198 5,027 S.F. 197 5,027 S.F. 196 5,027 S.F. 195 5,027 S.F. 194 5,027 S.F. 193 5,027 S.F. 192 5,027 S.F. 191 5,027 S.F. 190 5,027 S.F. 189 5,027 S.F. 188 5,027 S.F. 187 5,027 S.F. 186 5,027 S.F. 185 5,027 S.F. 184 6,233 S.F. 183 5,586 S.F. 201 6,333 S.F. 202 6,229 S.F. 203 5,023 S.F. 204 5,023 S.F. 205 5,023 S.F. 206 5,023 S.F. 207 5,023 S.F. 208 5,023 S.F. 209 5,023 S.F. 210 5,023 S.F. 211 5,023 S.F. 212 5,023 S.F. 213 5,023 S.F. 214 5,023 S.F. 215 5,023 S.F. 216 5,023 S.F. 217 6,229 S.F. 218 5,315 S.F. 236 6,091 S.F. 237 5,577 S.F. 238 5,075 S.F. 239 5,075 S.F. 240 5,075 S.F. 241 5,075 S.F. 242 5,075 S.F. 243 5,075 S.F. 244 5,075 S.F. 245 5,075 S.F. 246 5,075 S.F. 247 5,075 S.F. 249 10,129 S.F. 251 11,122 S.F. 252 9,364 S.F. 253 10,394 S.F. 254 12,420 S.F. 255 12,222 S.F. 256 10,927 S.F. 257 9,303 S.F. 258 9,363 S.F. 259 10,393 S.F. 260 12,420 S.F. 261 12,224 S.F. 262 10,946 S.F. 263 9,313 S.F. 264 9,312 S.F. 265 10,210 S.F. 266 12,591 S.F. 267 12,417 S.F. 268 10,740 S.F. 269 8,659 S.F. OUTLOT A 183,570SF 250 10,146 S.F. 270 6,125 S.F. 271 5,564 S.F. 248 5,964 S.F. 219 5,609 S.F. 220 6,233 S.F. 221 5,027 S.F. 222 5,027 S.F. 223 5,027 S.F. 224 5,027 S.F. 225 5,027 S.F. 226 5,027 S.F. 227 5,027 S.F. 228 5,027 S.F. 229 5,027 S.F. 230 5,027 S.F. 231 5,027 S.F. 232 5,027 S.F. 233 5,027 S.F. 234 5,027 S.F. 235 6,233 S.F. 1 5,564 S.F.
3 6,231 S.F.
4 5,025 S.F.

STREET A

STREET C

STREET B

STREET A STREET E STREET F STREET D STREET L

STREET K

STREET K VERA COURT GONZALES STREET
AMADOR STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

Ch. By: Date: Scale: As Noted YH Job No. Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Jared Jones Plot Date: 11/3/2025 File Location: F:\2025\25-142\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\25-142_TTM_SHEET 2.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM JP/JRJ AB 10/27/25 25-142 2 3
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6541
NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELMONT AVENUE AND STATE ROUTE 33 MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 3 TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 529550 551 552 553
TRACT MAP 6148

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 589 590591 592 593594 595 596 Cul-de-sac appears to extend over property line Include this texture in the legend 104'
MMC Section16.32.020 requiresopposing streets beoffset by at least 125' Provide curveradii (typ.) (STORM DRAIN RETENTION BASIN) show POC to lastexisting manhole
flip arrows
flip direction?
EXTENSION OFWESTSIDE SEWERINTERCEPTOR;DESIGN PROVIDEDBY CITY 7 5,025 S.F.
8 6,231 S.F.
9 5,564 S.F. 10 5,565 S.F. 17 5,123 S.F. 18 6,530 S.F. 19 5,599 S.F. 28 5,577 S.F. 32 5,025 S.F. 33 5,025 S.F. 34 5,025 S.F. 35 5,025 S.F. 36 5,025 S.F. 37 5,025 S.F. 38 5,025 S.F. 39 7,564 S.F. 43 5,025 S.F. 44 6,357 S.F. 45 6,231 S.F. 46 5,025 S.F. 47 5,025 S.F. 48 5,025 S.F. 49 5,025 S.F. 50 5,025 S.F. 51 5,025 S.F. 52 5,025 S.F. 53 5,025 S.F. 54 5,025 S.F. 55 5,025 S.F. 56 5,025 S.F. 57 5,025 S.F. 58 5,025 S.F. 59 5,025 S.F. 60 6,231 S.F. 61 5,338 S.F. 79 6,067 S.F. 80 6,333 S.F. 81 6,229 S.F. 82 5,023 S.F. 83 5,023 S.F. 84 5,023 S.F. 85 5,023 S.F. 86 5,023 S.F. 87 5,023 S.F. 88 5,023 S.F. 89 5,023 S.F. 90 5,023 S.F. 91 5,023 S.F. 92 5,023 S.F. 93 5,023 S.F. 94 5,023 S.F. 95 5,023 S.F. 96 6,229 S.F. 97 5,315 S.F. 115 6,069 S.F. 116 6,333 S.F. 117 6,229 S.F. 118 5,023 S.F. 119 5,023 S.F. 120 5,023 S.F. 121 5,023 S.F. 122 5,023 S.F. 123 5,023 S.F. 124 5,023 S.F. 125 5,023 S.F. 126 5,023 S.F. 127 5,023 S.F. 128 5,023 S.F. 129 5,023 S.F. 130 5,023 S.F. 131 5,023 S.F. 132 6,229 S.F. 133 5,315 S.F. 151 6,069 S.F. 152 5,025 S.F. 153 6,231 S.F. 154 6,231 S.F. 155 5,025 S.F. 156 5,025 S.F. 157 5,025 S.F. 158 5,025 S.F. 159 5,025 S.F. 160 5,025 S.F. 161 5,025 S.F. 162 6,231 S.F. 163 6,231 S.F. 40 14,446 S.F. 41 7,561 S.F. 12 5,276 S.F. 13 5,276 S.F. 14 5,276 S.F. 15 5,125 S.F.20 5,651 S.F. 21 5,025 S.F. 22 6,231 S.F. 23 5,025 S.F. 24 5,025 S.F. 25 5,025 S.F. 26 5,025 S.F. 27 5,025 S.F. 29 5,577 S.F. 30 6,231 S.F. 31 5,025 S.F. 42 5,025 S.F. 134 5,586 S.F. 135 6,233 S.F. 136 5,027 S.F. 137 5,027 S.F. 138 5,027 S.F. 139 5,027 S.F. 140 5,027 S.F. 141 5,027 S.F. 142 5,027 S.F. 143 5,027 S.F. 144 5,027 S.F. 145 5,027 S.F. 146 5,027 S.F. 147 5,027 S.F. 148 5,027 S.F. 149 5,027 S.F. 150 6,233 S.F. 114 6,233 S.F. 113 5,027 S.F. 112 5,027 S.F. 111 5,027 S.F. 110 5,027 S.F. 109 5,027 S.F. 108 5,027 S.F. 107 5,027 S.F. 106 5,027 S.F. 105 5,027 S.F. 104 5,027 S.F. 103 5,027 S.F. 102 5,027 S.F. 101 5,027 S.F. 100 5,027 S.F. 99 6,233 S.F. 98 5,586 S.F. 11 6,533 S.F. 16 6,293 S.F. 62 5,584 S.F. 63 6,231 S.F. 64 5,025 S.F. 65 5,025 S.F. 66 5,025 S.F. 67 5,025 S.F. 68 5,025 S.F. 69 5,025 S.F. 70 5,025 S.F. 71 5,025 S.F. 72 5,025 S.F. 73 5,025 S.F. 74 5,025 S.F. 75 5,025 S.F. 76 5,025 S.F. 77 5,025 S.F. 78 6,231 S.F. CASTANEDA

STREET A STREET F STREET G STREET H

STREET J SILVA STREET SILVA STREET

STREET K
STREET K STREET Ref. & Rev.

PROJECT TITLE

SHEET DESCRIPTION
Dr. By:

Ch. By: Date: Scale: As Noted YH Job No. Sheet No. of Sheets Plot By: Jared Jones Plot Date: 11/3/2025 File Location: F:\2025\25-142\dwg\Maps\Tentative Map\25-142_TTM_SHEET 3.dwg 2985 N. BURL AVENUE SUITE 101 FRESNO, CA 93727
TEL: (559) 244-3123 WEBSITE: YANDHENGR.COM JP/JRJ AB 10/27/25 25-142 3 3
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 6541
NORTHWEST CORNER OF BELMONT AVENUE AND STATE ROUTE 33 MATCHLINE-SEE SHEET 2 TRACT MAP 6146

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 529 528550 527 526 510 509 508 507 TRACT MAP 6111

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 271 272 270 269
TRACT MAP 5826

EX ZONING: R-1 SFR MED DENSITY 160 161 159 Restrict access to Amador Avenue forlot 20
The City will likely condition trafficcalming measures for streets D, E, F,G, H, and K. 119'
MMC Section16.32.020 requiresopposing streets beoffset by at least 125' may be able toremove valley gutterand flow G to east

CASTANEDA STREET SILVA STREET
“Exhibit B” TO RESOLUTION NO. 26-71
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
https://www.cityofmendota.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/Tract-No.-6541-DraftCEQA-Document_F.pdf

CITY OF MENDOTA
TRACT NO. 6541

DRAFT INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE

DECLARATION

FRESNO COUNTY
AUGUST 2026
PREPARED FOR:

City of Mendota
643 Quince St, Mendota, CA 93640
PREPARED BY:

PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
455 W. Fir Avenue, Clovis, CA 93611
‘3 N15
1 S
\flfifluflflffl ch: :53"”12;?" """:=-”--’--'5 x", » if“ .. a? 5‘4 x‘a“ ”diam E9:
‘5’? THE wua‘t

CITYOF MENDOTA
TRACTNO. 6541

DRAFTINITIALSTUDY/MITIGATEDNEGATIVE

DECLARATION

FRESNOCOUNTY
AUGUST2026
PREPAREDFOR:

Ci’ry of Mendo’ro
643 Quince S’r,Mendo’ro, CA 93640
PREPAREDBY:

PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP
455 W. Fir Avenue, Clovis, CA 9361 1

PROVOST&

PRITCHARD
"G:\Mendota_City of-3336\3336 On-Going Planning Services\City Project Files\333626003-2603 - Vesting Tentative Map No. 6541\Environmental\Draft ENV\Tract No. 6541 Draft CEQA Document.docx"
COPYRIGHT 2026 BY PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights to this document. This document is not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group In the event of unauthorized reuse of the information contained herein by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group's legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.

Report Prepared for:

City of Mendota
City of Mendota
643 Quince St
Mendota, CA 93640
Contact:

Cristian Gonzalez
(559) 655-4298
Report Prepared by:

Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP, Project Manager/QAQC
Alejandra Lopez Gonzalez, Technical Writer
Riley Vera, Technical Writer
Benjamin Toews, GIS Specialist
Morganne Colvard, Administrative Support
Contact:

Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP
(559) 449-2700
COPYRIGHT 2026 BY PROVOST & PRITCHARD CONSULTING GROUP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group expressly reserves its common law copyright and other applicable property rights to this document. This document is not to be reproduced, changed, or copied in any form or manner whatsoever, nor are they to be assigned to a third party without first obtaining the written permission and consent of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group In the event of unauthorized reuse of the information contained herein by a third party, the third party shall hold the firm of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group harmless, and shall bear the cost of Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group's legal fees associated with defending and enforcing these rights.

Report Prepared for:

City of Mendota
City of Mendota
643 Quince St
Mendota, CA 93640
Contact:

Cristian Gonzalez
(559)655-4298
Report Prepared by:

Provost& Pritchard Consulting Group
Wyatt Czeshinski,AICP,Project Manager/QAQC
Alejandra LopezGonzalez,TechnicalWriter
RileyVera,Technical Writer
Benjamin Toews, GISSpecialist
Morganne Colvard,Administrative Support
Contact:

Wyatt Czeshinski,AICP
(559)449—2700
"G:\Mendota_City of—3336\3336 On—GoingPlanning Services\City Project Files\333626003—2603 — Vesting Tentative Map No. 6541\Environmenta|\Draft ENV\Tract No. 6541 Draft CEQADocumentdocx” City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
www.provostandpritchard.com Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1-1

1.1 Regulatory information................................................................................................................. 1-1

1.2 Document Format......................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 Project Description ...................................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 Project Background....................................................................................................................... 2-1

2.1.1 Lead Agency Name and Address ................................................................................ 2-1

2.1.2 Contact Person and Phone Number........................................................................... 2-1

2.1.3 CEQA Consultant ......................................................................................................... 2-1

2.1.4 Project Location........................................................................................................... 2-1

2.1.5 General Plan Designation and Zoning ........................................................................ 2-1

2.1.6 Description of the Project........................................................................................... 2-1

2.1.7 Site and Surrounding Land Uses and Settings............................................................ 2-2

2.1.8 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval May be Required ....................................... 2-2

2.1.9 Consultation with California Native American Tribes................................................ 2-2 Chapter 3 Determination ............................................................................................................. 3-1

3.1 Potential Environmental Impacts................................................................................................. 3-1

3.2 Determination............................................................................................................................... 3-2 Chapter 4 Environmental Impact Analysis .................................................................................... 4-1

4.1 Aesthetics...................................................................................................................................... 4-1

4.1.1 Baseline Conditions..................................................................................................... 4-1

4.1.2 Impact Analysis............................................................................................................ 4-1

4.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources............................................................................................. 4-3

4.2.1 Baseline Conditions..................................................................................................... 4-3

4.2.2 Impact Analysis............................................................................................................ 4-4

4.3 Air Quality...................................................................................................................................... 4-7

4.3.1 Baseline Conditions..................................................................................................... 4-7

4.3.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-10

4.4 Biological Resources.................................................................................................................... 4-12

4.4.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-12

4.4.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-20

4.4.3 Mitigation ....................................................................................................................... 4-21

4.5 Cultural Resources...................................................................................................................... 4-23

4.5.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-23

4.5.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-23

4.6 Energy.......................................................................................................................................... 4-25

4.6.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-25

4.6.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-25

4.7 Geology and Soils........................................................................................................................ 4-27

4.7.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-27

4.7.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-28 City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 TABLEOF CONTENTS
Chapter 1

1.1 1.2
Chapter 2

2.1 Chapter3

3.1 3.2
Chapter 4

4.1 4.2

4.3 4.4

4.5 4.6

4.7 Introduction ................................................................................................................1-1 Regulatory information.................................................................................................................1—1 Document Format......................................................................................................................... 1—1 Project Description ...................................................................................................... 2-1 Project Background.......................................................................................................................2—1

2.1.1 LeadAgencyName and Address................................................................................2—1

2.1.2 Contact Personand Phone Number...........................................................................2—1

2.1.3 CEQA Consultant ......................................................................................................... 2—1

2.1.4 Project Location........................................................................................................... 2—1

2.1.5 General Plan Designation and Zoning ........................................................................2—1

2.1.6 Description of the Project ........................................................................................... 2—1

2.1.7 Site and Surrounding Land Usesand Settings............................................................ 2—2

2.1.8 Other Public AgenciesWhose Approval May be Required ....................................... 2—2

2.1.9 Consultation with California Native American Tribes................................................ 2—2 Determination .............................................................................................................3-1 Potential Environmental Impacts.................................................................................................3—1 Determination ............................................................................................................................... 3—2 Environmental Impact Analysis....................................................................................4-1 Aesthetics......................................................................................................................................4—1

4.1.1 BaselineConditions .....................................................................................................4—1

4.1.2 Impact Analysis............................................................................................................ 4—1 Agriculture and Forestry Resources............................................................................................. 4—3

4.2.1 BaselineConditions ..................................................................................................... 4—3

4.2.2 Impact Analysis............................................................................................................ 4—4 Air Quality......................................................................................................................................4—7

4.3.1 BaselineConditions ..................................................................................................... 4—7

4.3.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—10 Biological Resources....................................................................................................................4—12

4.4.1 BaselineConditions ................................................................................................... 4—12

4.4.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—20

4.4.3 Mitigation ....................................................................................................................... 4—21 Cultural Resources......................................................................................................................4—23

4.5.1 BaselineConditions ................................................................................................... 4—23

4.5.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—23 Energy .......................................................................................................................................... 4—25

4.6.1 BaselineConditions ................................................................................................... 4—25

4.6.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—25 Geology and Soils........................................................................................................................ 4—27

4.7.1 BaselineConditions ................................................................................................... 4—27

4.7.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—28 \MMNprovostondpritchard.com Page i
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
www.provostandpritchard.com Page ii

4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions......................................................................................................... 4-31

4.8.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-31

4.8.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-33

4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.............................................................................................. 4-35

4.9.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-35

4.9.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-36

4.10 Hydrology and Water Quality..................................................................................................... 4-38

4.10.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-38

4.10.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-39

4.11 Land Use and Planning................................................................................................................ 4-42

4.11.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-42

4.11.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-42

4.12 Mineral Resources....................................................................................................................... 4-44

4.12.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-44

4.12.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-44

4.13 Noise ............................................................................................................................................ 4-46

4.13.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-46

4.13.2 Applicable Regulations.............................................................................................. 4-46

4.13.3 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-47

4.14 Population and Housing.............................................................................................................. 4-49

4.14.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-49

4.14.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-49

4.15 Public Services............................................................................................................................. 4-51

4.15.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-51

4.15.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-52

4.16 Recreation ................................................................................................................................... 4-54

4.16.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-54

4.16.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-54

4.17 Transportation............................................................................................................................. 4-55

4.17.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-55

4.17.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-55

4.18 Tribal Cultural Resources............................................................................................................ 4-57

4.18.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-57

4.18.2 Impact Asessment..................................................................................................... 4-58

4.19 Utilities and Service Systems...................................................................................................... 4-59

4.19.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-59

4.19.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-59

4.19.3 Mitigation................................................................................................................... 4-61

4.20 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................................ 4-62 City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 4.8

4.9 4.10

4.11 4.12

4.13 4.14

4.15 4.16

4.17 4.18

4.19 4.20
Greenhouse Gas Emissions......................................................................................................... 4—31

4.8.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—31

4.8.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—33 Hazards and Hazardous Materials.............................................................................................. 4—35

4.9.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—35

4.9.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—36 Hydrology and Water Quality.....................................................................................................4—38

4.10.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—38

4.10.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—39 Land Useand Planning................................................................................................................4—42

4.11.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—42

4.11.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—42 Mineral Resources....................................................................................................................... 4—44

4.12.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—44

4.12.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—44 Noise ............................................................................................................................................ 4—46

4.13.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—46

4.13.2 Applicable Regulations..............................................................................................4—46

4.13.3 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—47 Population and Housing..............................................................................................................4—49

4.14.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—49

4.14.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—49 Public Services ............................................................................................................................. 4—51

4.15.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—51

4.15.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—52 Recreation ................................................................................................................................... 4—54

4.16.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—54

4.16.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—54 Transportation............................................................................................................................. 4—55

4.17.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—55

4.17.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—55 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................................ 4—57

4.18.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—57

4.18.2 Impact Asessment ..................................................................................................... 4—58 Utilities and ServiceSystems...................................................................................................... 4—59

4.19.1 Baseline Conditions ................................................................................................... 4—59

4.19.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4—59

4.19.3 Mitigation................................................................................................................... 4—61 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................................ 4—62 \MMNprovostondpritchard.com Page ii
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
www.provostandpritchard.com Page iii

4.20.1 Baseline Conditions................................................................................................... 4-62

4.20.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-63

4.21 CEQA Mandatory Findings of Significance................................................................................. 4-64

4.21.1 Statement of Findings............................................................................................... 4-64 Chapter 5 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program ........................................................... 5-1 Chapter 6 References .................................................................................................................. 6-1 City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 4.20.1 BaselineConditions ................................................................................................... 4-62

4.20.2 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................... 4-63

4.21 CEQAMandatory Findingsof Significance.................................................................................4-64

4.21.1 Statement of Findings...............................................................................................4-64 Chapter 5 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program ...........................................................5-1 Chapter 6 References..................................................................................................................6-1 \MMNprovostondpritchard.com Page iii
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
www.provostandpritchard.com Page iv

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 2-1: Regional Location Map ................................................................................................................. 2-4 Figure 2-2: Aerial Site Map.............................................................................................................................. 2-5 Figure 2-3: Topo Quad Map ............................................................................................................................ 2-6 Figure 2-4: General Plan Land Use Designation Map .................................................................................... 2-7 Figure 2-5: Zone District Map.......................................................................................................................... 2-8 Figure 4-1: Farmland Designation Map .......................................................................................................... 4-6 Figure 4-2: FEMA Flood Map......................................................................................................................... 4-41

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1: Existing Uses, General Plan Designation, & Zone Districts of Surrounding Properties .............. 2-2 Table 4-1: Aesthetics Impacts......................................................................................................................... 4-1 Table 4-2: Agriculture and Forest Impacts..................................................................................................... 4-3 Table 4-3: Air Quality Impacts......................................................................................................................... 4-7 Table 4-4: Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Designation................................. 4-8 Table 4-5: Project-Level Air Quality CEQA Thresholds of Significance.......................................................... 4-9 Table 4-6:Unmitigated Short-Term Construction Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants........... 4-10 Table 4-7: Unmitigated Long-Term Operational Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants............. 4-10 Table 4-8: Biological Resources Impacts....................................................................................................... 4-12 Table 4-9. List of Special Status Plant Species with Potential to Occur on the site and/or in the Vicinity 4-13 Table 4-10. List of Special Status Animal Species with Potential to Occur on the site and/or in the Vicinity ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4-14 Table 4-11: Cultural Resources Impacts....................................................................................................... 4-23 Table 4-12: Energy Impacts........................................................................................................................... 4-25 Table 4-13: Geology and Soils Impacts......................................................................................................... 4-27 Table 4-14: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts.......................................................................................... 4-31 Table 4-15: Short Term Construction Related GHG Emissions.................................................................... 4-33 Table 4-16: Long Term Operational Related GHG Emissions...................................................................... 4-33 Table 4-17: Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts............................................................................... 4-35 Table 4-18: Hydrology and Water Quality Impacts...................................................................................... 4-38 Table 4-19: Land Use and Planning Impacts................................................................................................. 4-42 Table 4-20: Mineral Resources Impacts ....................................................................................................... 4-44 Table 4-21: Noise Impacts............................................................................................................................. 4-46 Table 4-22: Noise Level Standards................................................................................................................ 4-47 Table 4-23: Population and Housing Impacts............................................................................................... 4-49 Table 4-24: Public Services............................................................................................................................ 4-51 Table 4-25: Recreation Impacts.................................................................................................................... 4-54 Table 4-26: Transportation Impacts.............................................................................................................. 4-55 Table 4-27: Tribal Cultural Resources Impacts............................................................................................. 4-57 Table 4-28: Utilities and Service Systems Impacts....................................................................................... 4-59 Table 4-29: Wildfire Impacts......................................................................................................................... 4-62 Table 4-30: CEQA Mandatory Findings of Significance................................................................................ 4-64 Table 5-1: Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program.......................................................................... 5-2

APPENDICES
Appendix A – Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission’s Model Appendix B – Biological Evaluation
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 LISTOF FIGURES
Figure 2—1:Regional Location Map ................................................................................................................. 2—4 Figure 2—2:Aerial Site Map.............................................................................................................................. 2—5 Figure 2—3:Topo Quad Map ............................................................................................................................ 2—6 Figure 2—4:General Plan Land UseDesignation IVIap....................................................................................2—7 Figure 2—5:Zone District Map.......................................................................................................................... 2—8 Figure 4—1:Farmland Designation IVIap.......................................................................................................... 4—6 Figure 4—2:FEMAFlood Map......................................................................................................................... 4-41

LISTOF TABLES
Table 2—1:ExistingUses,General Plan Designation, & Zone Districts of Surrounding Properties ..............2—2 Table 4—1:Aesthetics Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 4—1 Table 4—2:Agriculture and Forest Impacts .....................................................................................................4—3 Table 4—3:Air Quality Impacts......................................................................................................................... 4—7 Table 4—4:Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standardsand Attainment Designation................................. 4—8 Table 4—5:Project—LevelAir Quality CEQAThresholds of Significance.......................................................... 4—9 Table 4-6:Unmitigated Short—TermConstruction Generated Emissionsof Criteria Air Pollutants ...........4-10 Table 4-7: Unmitigated Long—TermOperational Generated Emissionsof Criteria Air Pollutants ............. 4-10 Table 4—8:Biological ResourcesImpacts....................................................................................................... 4-12 Table 4-9. List of SpecialStatus Plant Species with Potential to Occur on the site and/or in the Vicinity 4-13 Table 4-10. List of SpecialStatus Animal Species with Potential to Occur on the site and/or in the Vicinity ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4—14 Table 4—11:Cultural ResourcesImpacts ....................................................................................................... 4-23 Table 4—12:Energy Impacts........................................................................................................................... 4-25 Table 4—13:Geology and SoilsImpacts......................................................................................................... 4-27 Table 4—14:Greenhouse GasEmissionsImpacts.......................................................................................... 4-31 Table 4-15: Short Term Construction RelatedGHGEmissions....................................................................4-33 Table 4—16:LongTerm Operational Related GHGEmissions......................................................................4-33 Table 4—17:Hazardsand HazardousMaterials Impacts...............................................................................4-35 Table 4—18:Hydrology and Water Quality Impacts......................................................................................4-38 Table 4—19:Land Useand Planning Impacts.................................................................................................4-42 Table 4—20:Mineral ResourcesImpacts ....................................................................................................... 4-44 Table 4—21:Noise Impacts ............................................................................................................................. 4-46 Table 4—22:Noise LevelStandards................................................................................................................4-47 Table 4—23:Population and Housing Impacts...............................................................................................4-49 Table 4—24:PublicServices............................................................................................................................ 4-51 Table 4—25:Recreation Impacts ....................................................................................................................4-54 Table 4—26:Transportation Impacts..............................................................................................................4-55 Table 4—27:Tribal Cultural ResourcesImpacts............................................................................................. 4-57 Table 4—28:Utilities and ServiceSystemsImpacts....................................................................................... 4-59 Table 4—29:Wildfire Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 4-62 Table 4—30:CEQAMandatory Findingsof Significance................................................................................4-64 Table 5-1:Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program..........................................................................5—2

APPENDICES
Aggendix A — Air Quality and GreenhouseGasEmission’sModel Aggendix B —Biological Evaluation
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com Page iv
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
www.provostandpritchard.com Page v
Appendix C – Cultural Records Search Summary
Appendix D – Traffic Study
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Aggendix C— Cultural RecordsSearchSummary Aggendix D — Traffic Study
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com Page v
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
www.provostandpritchard.com Page vi

ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS
AB---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assembly Bill APN--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessor’s Parcel Number BMP------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Best Management Practices CalEEMod---------------------------------------------------------- California Emissions Estimator Modeling (software) CARB --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------California Air Resources Board CCAA----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- California Clean Air Act CalFire ----------------------------------------------------------- California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CDFW----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- California Fish and Wildlife CEQA------------------------------------------------------------------------------------California Environmental Quality Act CFCs--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chlorofluorocarbons CH4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methane CGS-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------California Geological Survey City ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------City of Mendota CNDDB--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- California Natural Diversity Database CO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Carbone Monoxide CO2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Carbon dioxide COG -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Fresno Council of Governments County-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------County of Fresno dBA------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------A-weighted decibel DOC -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Department of Conservation DTSC ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Department of Toxic Substances Control EIR----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Environmental Impact Report FEMA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Federal Emergency Management Agency FMMP ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program GHG---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Greenhouse Gas GIS---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Geographic Information System GSA--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Groundwater Sustainability Agency GSP------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Groundwater Sustainability Plan GWP-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Global Warming Potential HFCs----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Hydrofluorocarbons IS-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Initial Study IS/MND-----------------------------------------------------------------------Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration LAFCo------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission LOS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level of Service MMRP ---------------------------------------------------------------------Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program MND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mitigated Negative Declaration MRZ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mineral Resource Zone NAHC --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Native American Heritage Commission ND -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Negative Declaration NO2 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nitrogen dioxide NOx------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oxides of nitrogen O3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Ozone Pb--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lead PG&E----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pacific Gas and Electric PM10------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ particulate matter 10 microns in size PM2.5 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- particulate matter 2.5 microns in size ppm ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------parts per million PFCs------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Perfluorocarbons City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 ACRONYMS& ABBREVIATIONS AB AssemblyBill
APN Assessor’sParcelNumber
BMP Best Management Practices
CalEElVIod California EmissionsEstimator Modeling (software) CARB California Air ResourcesBoard
CCAA California CleanAir Act
CalFire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection CDFW California Fishand Wildlife
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFCs Chlorofluorocarbons
CH4 Methane
CGS California GeologicalSurvey
City City of Mendota
CNDDB California Natural Diversity Database
CO Carbone Monoxide
C02 Carbon dioxide
COG Fresno Council of Governments
County County of Fresno
dBA A-weighted decibel
DOC Department of Conservation
DTSC Department of ToxicSubstancesControl
EIR Environmental Impact Report
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
FMMP Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GIS Geographic Information System
GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan
GWP Global Warming Potential
HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons
IS Initial Study
IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
LAFCo Fresno Local Agency Formation Commission
LOS Levelof Service
MMRP Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
MND Mitigated Negative Declaration
MRZ Mineral ResourceZone
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
ND Negative Declaration
N02 Nitrogen dioxide
NOx Oxidesof nitrogen
03 Ozone
Pb Lead
PG&E PacificGasand Electric
PM“) particulate matter 10 microns in size
PM25 particulate matter 2.5 microns in size
ppm parts per million
PFCs Perfluorocarbons
WANprovostondpritchard.com Page vi
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
www.provostandpritchard.com Page vii
Project--------------------------------------------------------------------- Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Project ROG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Reactive Organic Gases RTP ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regional Transportation Plan SB--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Senate Bill SF6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sulfur Hexafluoride SJVAB ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- San Joaquin Valley Air Basin SJVAPCD------------------------------------------------------------------San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District SOI-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Sphere of Influence SO2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sulfur Dioxide SOx--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sulfur Oxides SSJVIC------------------------------------------------------------------- Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center SR------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State Route SRA-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------State Responsibility Area SWPPP------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Water Resources Control Board USEPA -------------------------------------------------------------------United States Environmental Protection Agency USFWS-------------------------------------------------------------------------------United States Fish and Wildlife Service UST --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Underground Storage Tank VHFHSZ--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone μg/m3 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------micrograms per cubic meter City of Mendota
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Project
ROG
RTP
SB
SF6
SJVAB

SJVAPCD
SOI
SOZ
SOx
SSJVIC
SR
SRA
SWPPP
SWRCB
USEPA
USFWS
UST
VHFHSZ
ug/m3
WANprovostondpritchard.com
August 2026 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Project Reactive Organic Gases
RegionalTransportation Plan
SenateBill
Sulfur Hexafluoride
SanJoaquin ValleyAir Basin
SanJoaquin ValleyAir Pollution Control District
Sphere of Influence
Sulfur Dioxide
Sulfur Oxides
Southern SanJoaquinValley Information Center
State Route
State ResponsibilityArea
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
State Water ResourcesControl Board
United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency
United States Fishand Wildlife Service
Underground StorageTank
Very High Fire HazardSeverity Zone
micrograms per cubic meter
Page vii
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 1: Introduction
www.provostandpritchard.com 1-1
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group (Provost & Pritchard) has prepared this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) on behalf of the City of Mendota (City) to address the environmental effects of the Tract No. 6541 (Project). This document has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. The City is the CEQA lead agency for this Project.

The site and the Project are described in detail in Chapter 2 Project Description.

1.1 REGULATORY INFORMATION
An Initial Study (IS) is a document prepared by a lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment. In accordance with California Code of Regulations Title 14 (Chapter 3, Section 15000, et seq.)-- also known as the CEQA Guidelines--Section 15064 (a)(1) states that an environmental impact report (EIR) must be prepared if there is substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the Project under review may have a significant effect on the environment and should be further analyzed to determine mitigation measures or project alternatives that might avoid or reduce project impacts to less than significant levels. A negative declaration (ND) may be prepared instead if the lead agency finds that there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. An ND is a written statement describing the reasons why a proposed Project, not otherwise exempt from CEQA, would not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, why it would not require the preparation of an EIR (CEQA Guidelines Section 15371). According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15070, a ND or mitigated ND (MND) shall be prepared for a project subject to CEQA when either:
a. The IS shows there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the proposed Project may have a significant effect on the environment, or b. The IS identified potentially significant effects, but:

1. Revisions in the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before the proposed MND and IS is released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur is prepared, and

2. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the proposed Project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.

1.2 DOCUMENT FORMAT
This IS/MND contains six chapters Chapter 1 Introduction, provides an overview of the Project and the CEQA process Chapter 2 Project Description, provides a detailed description of proposed Project components and objectives. Chapter 3 Determination, the Lead Agency’s determination based upon this initial evaluation. Chapter 4 Environmental Impact Analysis presents the CEQA checklist and environmental analysis for all impact areas, mandatory findings of significance, and feasible mitigation measures. If the Project does not have the potential to significantly impact a given issue area, the relevant section provides a brief discussion of the reasons why no impacts are expected. If the Project could have a potentially significant impact on a resource, the issue area discussion provides a description of potential impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures and/or permit requirements that would reduce those impacts to a less than significant level. Chapter 5 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP), provides the proposed mitigation measures, implementation timelines, and the entity/agency responsible for ensuring implementation. Chapter 6 References details the documents and reports this document relies upon to provide its analysis.

City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 1: Introduction
CHAPTER‘I INTRODUCTION
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group (Provost & Pritchard) has prepared this Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) on behalf ofthe City of Mendota (City)to addressthe environmental effects of the Tract No. 6541 (Project). This document has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),Public ResourcesCodeSection 21000 et seq. The City is the CEQAlead agency for this Project.

The site and the Project are described in detail in Chapter 2 Project Description.

1.1 REGULATORYINFORMATION
An Initial Study (IS)is a document prepared by a lead agency to determine whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment. In accordance with California Code of RegulationsTitle 14 (Chapter 3, Section 15000,et seq.)—— also known as the CEQAGuidelines--Section 15064 (a)(1) states that an environmental impact report (EIR)must be prepared if there is substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the Project under review may have a significant effect on the environment and should be further analyzed to determine mitigation measures or project alternatives that might avoid or reduce project impacts to less than significant levels. A negative declaration (ND) may be prepared instead if the lead agency finds that there is no substantial evidence in light of the whole record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. An ND is a written statement describing the reasons why a proposed Project, not otherwise exempt from CEQA, would not have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, why it would not require the preparation of an EIR(CEQAGuidelines Section 15371).According to CEQAGuidelinesSection 15070,3 ND or mitigated ND (MND) shall be prepared for a project subject to CEQA when either:
a. The ISshows there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency,that the proposed Project may have a significant effect on the environment, or b. The ISidentified potentially significant effects, but:

1. Revisionsin the project plans or proposals made by or agreed to by the applicant before the proposed MND and ISis released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur is prepared, and

2. There is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the proposed Project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment.

1.2 DOCUMENTFORMAT
This IS/MND contains six chapters Chapter 1 Introduction, provides an overview of the Project and the CEQA process Chapter 2 Project Description, provides a detailed description of proposed Project components and objectives. Chapter 3 Determination, the LeadAgency’s determination based upon this initial evaluation. Chapter 4 Environmental Impact Analysispresents the CEQAchecklist and environmental analysis for all impact areas, mandatory findings of significance, and feasible mitigation measures. If the Project does not have the potential to significantly impact a given issuearea, the relevant section provides a brief discussion of the reasons why no impacts are expected. If the Project could have a potentially significant impact on a resource, the issue area discussionprovides a description of potential impacts, and appropriate mitigation measures and/or permit requirements that would reduce those impacts to a less than significant level. Chapter 5 Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (IVIIVIRP),provides the proposed mitigation measures, implementation timelines, and the entity/agency responsible for ensuring implementation. Chapter 6 References details the documents and reports this document relies upon to provide its analysis.
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 1-1
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 1: Introduction
www.provostandpritchard.com 1-2
The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Model, Biological Evaluation, Cultural Records Search Summary, and Traffic Study are provided as technical Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C, and Appendix D respectively, at the end of this document.

City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 1: Introduction
The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Model, Biological Evaluation, Cultural Records Search Summary, and Traffic Study are provided as technical Appendix A, Appendix B, Appendix C, and Appendix D respectively, at the end of this document.
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 1-2
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 2: Project Description
www.provostandpritchard.com 2-1
CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Project

2.1.1 LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
City of Mendota
643 Quince Street
Mendota, CA 93640

2.1.2 CONTACT PERSON AND PHONE NUMBER
Cristian Gonzalez
City Manager
(559) 655-4298

2.1.3 CEQA CONSULTANT
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP, Project Manager
(559) 449-2700

2.1.4 PROJECT LOCATION
The Project is located in Mendota, California, approximately 35 miles west of Fresno and eight miles southeast of Firebaugh in western Fresno County (see Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-2). The Project site is located on Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST. The centroid of the Project site is 36°45'39.99"N, 120°24'0.08"W.

2.1.5 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION AND ZONING
The Project site is currently designated as Low Density Residential and Public Facilities by the City of Mendota General Plan and is currently zoned as Exclusive Agriculture (20 acres) by the County of Fresno.1 2 2.1.6 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
The proposed Project involves the development of a 271 single-family residential subdivision on an approximately 53.43 acre portion of APN 012-190-25ST and 012-160-25ST (Project Site). Currently, the Project is located outside of the City of Mendota’s city limits and the City of Mendota’s Sphere of Influence.

In addition to the 271 single-family residential lot tentative subdivision map (TSM), the Project includes a request to amend the City’s Sphere of Influence (SOI) and annex the Project site into the City. The Project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN 012-190-25ST to Medium Density Residential while concurrently amending the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN 012-190-25ST to the R-1 zone district (Single-Family/Medium Density Residential), which is consistent with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation. Additionally, the Project 1 (City of Mendota, 2009)
2 (County of Fresno, 2025)
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 2: Project Description CHAPTER 2 PROJECTDESCRIPTION

2.1 PROJECTBACKGROUND
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Project

2.1.1 LEAD AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
City of Mendota
643 Quince Street
Mendota, CA 93640

2.1.2 CONTACT PERSONAND PHONENUMBER
Cristian Gonzalez
City Manager
(559)655-4298

2.1.3 CEQA CONSULTANT
Provost & Pritchard Consulting Group
Wyatt Czeshinski, AICP, Project Manager
(559) 449-2700

2.1.4 PROJECTLOCATION
The Project is located in Mendota, California, approximately 35 miles west of Fresno and eight miles southeast of Firebaughin western FresnoCounty (seeFigure 2-1 and Figure 2-2). The Project site is located on Assessor’sParcel Number (APN) 012—190—ZSST and 012—160-ZSST.The centroid of the Project site is 36°45'39.99"N, 120°24'0.08"W.

22.1.6 DESCRIPTIONOF THEPROJECT
The proposed Project involves the development of a 271 single-family residential subdivision on an approximately 53.43 acre portion of APN 012—190—255T and 012-160-ZSST(Project Site). Currently, the Project is located outside ofthe City of Mendota’s city limits and the City of Mendota’s Sphereof Influence.

In addition to the 271 single—family residential lot tentative subdivision map (TSM),the Project includes a request to amend the City’s Sphere of Influence (SCI)and annex the Project site into the City. The Project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN 012-190—255T to Medium Density Residential while concurrently amending the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN 012—190—ZSSTto the R—l zone district (Single—Fami/Medium Density Residential),which is consistent with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation. Additionally, the Project 1(City of Mendota, 2009)
2(County of Fresno, 2025)
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 2-1
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 2: Project Description
www.provostandpritchard.com 2-2
proposes to prezone APN 012-160-25ST to the P-F zone district (Public Facilities) which is consistent with the current Public Facility General Plan land use designation. The application also requests the Project be processed as a Planned Development to provide flexibility from the normally required development standards of the R-1 zone district. Upon approval of the Project the City of Mendota City Council, the amendment of the City’s SOI and annexation of the Project site would be initiated with the Fresno County Local Agency Formation Commission (Fresno LAFCo).

In addition to development of the subdivision, the Project would extend Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue with one lane in each direction. The Project would also include a new permanent storm drainage basin, approximately 4.21 acres in size, located immediately north of the subdivision (on APN 012-160- 25ST) to accommodate storm water runoff generated by the Project. Additionally, approximately one-half mile of new sewer main piping and manholes will extend the existing Westside Sewer Interceptor trunk line from its current terminus on the northside of the existing residential subdivision along Amador Avenue to the southern end of the development.

2.1.7 SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTINGS
Table 2-1: Existing Uses, General Plan Designation, & Zone Districts of Surrounding Properties Direction from
Project Site
Existing Use General Plan
Designation
Zone District
NORTH Agriculture and vacant Public Facilities AE-20 Exclusive Agriculture (County)
EAST Residential Medium Density Residential R-1 Single Family Medium Density Residential
SOUTH Agriculture and vacant Low Density Residential,
Medium Density Residential
AE-20 Exclusive Agriculture
WEST Agriculture and vacant Low Density Residential AE-20 Exclusive Agriculture

2.1.8 OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL MAY BE REQUIRED • County of Fresno (County)
• Fresno LAFCo
• San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD)

2.1.9 CONSULTATION WITH CALIFORNIA NATIVE AMERICAN TRIBES Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1, et seq. (codification of Assembly Bill [AB] 52, 2013-14) requires that a lead agency, within 14 days of determining that it will undertake a project, must notify in writing any California Native American Tribe traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project if that Tribe has previously requested notification about projects in that geographic area. The notice must briefly describe the project and inquire whether the Tribe wishes to initiate request formal consultation. Tribes have 30 days from receipt of notification to request formal consultation. The lead agency then has 30 days to initiate the consultation, which then continues until the parties come to an agreement regarding necessary mitigation or agree that no mitigation is needed, or one or both parties determine that negotiation occurred in good faith, but no agreement will be made. Additionally, Government Code Section 65352.3 (Senate Bill [SB] 18) requires that a lead agency notify California Native American Tribes that the lead agency is undertaking a General Plan Amendment and provide the Tribes 90 days to request formal consultation. The Tribes, which are determined based on a list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), have 90 days from the date on which they were contacted by the lead agency to request formal consultation.

City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 2: Project Description proposes to prezone APN012—160—ZSST to the P—F zone district (Public Facilities) which is consistent with the current Public Facility General Plan land use designation. The application also requests the Project be processed as a Planned Development to provide flexibility from the normally required development standards of the R-l zone district. Upon approval of the Project the City of Mendota City Council, the amendment of the City’sSCIand annexation of the Project site would be initiated with the Fresno County LocalAgencyFormation Commission (Fresno LAFCo).

In addition to development of the subdivision, the Project would extend Amador Avenue to Belmont Avenue with one lane in each direction. The Project would also include a new permanent storm drainage basin, approximately 4.21 acres in size, located immediately north of the subdivision (on APN 012—160- ZSST) to accommodate storm water runoff generated by the Project. Additionally, approximately one—half mile of new sewer main piping and manholes will extend the existing Westside SewerInterceptor trunk line from its current terminus on the northside of the existing residential subdivision along Amador Avenue to the southern end of the development.

2.1.7 SITE AND SURROUNDINGLAND USES AND SETTINGS
Table 2-1: Existin Uses, General Plan Des nation, & Zone Districts of Surroundi Pro rties I - o o ‘ ‘ ‘ ' o - I
' o - ‘ I - o o 0
NORTH Agriculture and vacant Public Facilities AE—ZOExclusiveAgriculture (County)
EAST Residential Medium Density Residential R—lSingle Family Medium Density Residential
SOUTH Agriculture and vacant Low Density Residential, AE—ZOExclusiveAgriculture Medium Density Residential
WEST Agriculture and vacant Low Density Residential AE—ZOExclusiveAgriculture

2.1.8 OTHERPUBLIC AGENCIESWHOSEAPPROVALMAY BEREQUIRED
0 County of Fresno (County)
0 Fresno LAFCo
0 SanJoaquin ValleyAir Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD)

2.1.9 CONSULTATIONWITHCALIFORNIANATIVEAMERICAN TRIBES
Public ResourcesCodeSection 21080.3.1, et seq. (codification ofAssemb/y Bill [AB] 52, 2013—14)requires that a lead agency,within 14 daysof determining that it will undertake a project, must notify in writing any California Native American Tribe traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project ifthat Tribe haspreviously requested notification about projects in that geographic area.The notice must briefly describe the project and inquire whether the Tribe wishes to initiate request formal consultation. Tribes have 30 days from receipt of notification to request formal consultation. The lead agency then has 30 days to initiate the consultation, which then continues until the parties come to an agreement regarding necessarymitigation or agree that no mitigation is needed, or one or both parties determine that negotiation occurred in good faith, but no agreement will be made. Additionally, Government CodeSection 65352.3(SenateBill [SB]18) requires that a lead agency notify California Native American Tribes that the lead agency is undertaking a General PlanAmendment and provide the Tribes 90 days to request formal consultation. The Tribes, which are determined based on a list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC),have 90 days from the date on which they were contacted by the lead agency to request formal consultation.
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 2-2
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 2: Project Description
www.provostandpritchard.com 2-3
The City of Mendota hasreceived written correspondence from the Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi Yokut Tribe requesting notification of projects pursuant to AB 52, resulting in an AB 52 letter being sent to this Tribe.

Additionally, the City notified a list of Tribes provided by NAHC pursuant to SB 18 due to the proposed General Plan Amendment.

City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 2: Project Description The City of Mendota hasreceived written correspondence from the SantaRosaRancheriaTachiYokutTribe requesting notification of projects pursuant to AB52, resulting in an AB52 letter being sent to this Tribe.

Additionally, the City notified a list of Tribes provided by NAHCpursuant to SB18 due to the proposed General PlanAmendment.
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 2-3
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 2: Project Description
www.provostandpritchard.com 2-4

Figure 2-1: Regional Location Map
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 2: Project Description \.>
Project.Sll'e \
Fresno Co; "-
l:| Census Place ‘- - CityLimits(variouscolors) El; _ E i E County 51% .. J
2 4 RegionalVicinityMap PROVOST&
Miles City of Mendota - Vesting Tentative Map No. 6541 PRITC HARD

1.1712022\\Eflfl¥t€Dl’iVE\CliEHtswendUt3_CitYelf—33363335(In-Going-Plannir-‘IgSewioesSUDZLOnGoing\VTM_6541W1M_6541.aprx Figure 2-1: Regional Location Map \MMNprovostondpritchard.com 2-4
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 2: Project Description
www.provostandpritchard.com 2-5

Figure 2-2: Aerial Site Map
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 2: Project Description “‘1‘ ,4; ‘ 4
.3“
P ,
I| E
Q
‘l HI H7.) ‘35. 0. If“, . .h ._ ' é l|'.- ‘., '.__."w - -.l {I-u ' I:‘_- #9 I ‘ BlackTAve.... 4. 1 1". ‘ 2
t: a, I Ila-Ii. {WW-J ‘ " 1 ’ u—J’ 0 3.].‘11'4" iii!!! mll‘. .3 :2 1'5“”! H‘Ptr ‘EJ'H‘I ‘ “r" -
“fliq
‘—l u . F’!'.‘- “I! r -8Ir": -,.':L't=a;."rf‘¢'.w*lI", .r .' _.' -- 1-1: a.m '4'£T.*.!:‘;r-I.'f.é‘-‘?m 7"-~“'-_.“5-45 1! E'3!a "11""“1'"‘5i ""-‘-‘-.“M5J'._i. :33 § Oxnard‘SfWV" i. rut . .i-I-‘fiET" q. u 1 '.' w 5 I
I
l_‘
I
II Il
I
ll
‘ in I.“ 3'. .
rug?
-1‘17:-L as: ‘~
P. ”’3‘ ' ‘
l I" . I I?-:{r ,' .,- 12.1!.
.1.~ ., my -' -s ‘1; A:
. * ______ ,, _,_ - ‘ __ _‘ _ Belmoave ‘ ':__.5_-£: _. AIR-9:3 -':'-f‘:"-.‘jr1'7i"114;:"'7?‘ ‘ ' '7" 4 - - ' ' “2"" '
II . . :uri- j'lif it." __
I' i '5'- ' : LIL-If: I. A E"? I E ProjectSite(57Acres) z. ‘ 4 ’ .1.- 7‘; ; 1-.1‘: <31 »_ r- f: :] Mendota CityLimit — “ " L. ' .—'2 MendotaCityson
o 500 1,000 Aerial Map PROVOST&
—:' Feet Cityr of Mendota - Vestmg . . Tentatlve Map No. 6541 PRITC HARD imam}k\Egarive\Cllcnts\Menduta_City uf-3335‘fi336Dru-GoingPlanningmmxarsxzozapnaomg'mm _5541\V'I'M_6541.apn( Figure 2-2: Aerial Site Map \MMNprovostondpritchard.com 2-5
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 2: Project Description
www.provostandpritchard.com 2-6

Figure 2-3: Topo Quad Map
City of Mendota
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 2: Project Description 45 “1171' '
_ . .. ._ 713531.45 W 5:2:- T145n:;‘4£ ' ' --
$.- 9 g —. V a - 2 §~g
E Project Site
USGSTopoMaps(1:24k) l
E Quad Name
' __-_£ Township/Range
E Section
12 if”???. 4°

41...".37
——v ’ II 0 750 1,500 Topographic' Map
FEEt City of Mendota --Vesting Tentative Map No. 6541
imam}k\Egafi-m\cllcnts\Menduta_City af-zsamaaaOrb-GoingPlanningmusmmzozapneamwnn 6541w1'M_6541.aprx Figure 2-3: Topo Quad Map WANprovostondpritchard.com
August 2026
"""""
' ="T1ésffi'1LSE
Tlfl5'315E
'X
"I“
H
{aH
U
5 5|~H
07 LljsesNationalMap”!
“I PROVOST&
PRlTCHARD
2—6
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 2: Project Description
www.provostandpritchard.com 2-7

Figure 2-4: General Plan Land Use Designation Map
City of Mendota
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 2: Project Description 1 F
Ohio Ave AmadorAve
— Fun—aha
E Project Site I
l" :1 Mendota City SOI
-EZ] Mendota City Limit City of Mendota GPLU
- General Commercial - Comunity Commercial - Light Industrial Public Facility Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential - Medium High Density Residential - High Density Residential I" Agricultural - Recreationai Buffer O 500 1,000 —:I Feet imam}kiEgariue\Cllcnts\Menduta_City uf-ZBEEXESBE Dru-Going Planning Sewlaesmlsumfi _OnGotng'\WM 554nm _554-1.apn( -——-——-—~' 'u! I l.r
l
l
1 LandUse Map
City of Mendota - Vesting Tentative Map No. 6541
August 2026
J‘\\ 9»; ,3"
o’g“G \ “A9°&
\
\ .. \ -;_,'_
\
\ ___________ .l
GOnzalez St
__ 233N111Sf Black-Ave
a: >< San Pedro St
Oxnard St F"—

PROVOST&
PRlTCHARD
Figure 2-4: General Plan Land UseDesignation Map
WANprovostondpritchard.com 2-7
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 2: Project Description
www.provostandpritchard.com 2-8

Figure 2-5: Zone District Map
City of Mendota
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 2: Project Description OhioAve E Project Site
l— -_1. Mendota CityLimit . _ _' MendotaCitySDI Fresno County Zoning - AE20-Exclusive Agricuitural
Cityof Mendota Zoning
- 0— OpenSpace/Recreation
- P-F-PublicFacilities R-l-SingleFamilyr Medium DensityResidential - R—2— Mulfiple FamilyMedium HighDensityResidential - R-3-Multiple FamllyHighDensityrResidential - C—l-NeighborhoodShoppingCenter - C-2-CommunityShoppingCenter - 03- CentralBusinessandShopping - M—l—LightManufacturingIndustrial PZ—Prezoned 0 500 1,000 Zoning Map —:I Feet City of Mendota - Vesting Tentative Map No. 6541
imam}kiEgariue\Cllcnts\Menduta_City uf-ZBBEXBSBEDru-GoingPlanningSewlmswmzmfipnfiomflwm _5541\VTM_554-1.apn( Figure 2-5: Zone District Map WANprovostondpritchard.com
August 2026
\ 8‘5
A?
f
(II >-
‘E
I
'"~.../
)
6 PROVOST&

PRITCHARD
2—8
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 3: Determination
www.provostandpritchard.com 3-1
CHAPTER 3 DETERMINATION

Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
The analyses of environmental impacts in Chapter 4 Impact Analysis result in an impact statement, which shall have the following meanings.

Potentially Significant Impact. This category is applicable if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant, and no feasible mitigation measures can be identified to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.

Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. This category applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures would reduce an effect from a “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measure(s), and briefly explain how they would reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from earlier analyses may be cross-referenced).

Less than Significant Impact. This category is identified when the proposed Project would result in impacts below the threshold of significance, and no mitigation measures are required.

No Impact. This category applies when a project would not create an impact in the specific environmental issue area. “No Impact” answers do not require a detailed explanation if they are adequately supported by the information sources cited by the lead agency, which show that the impact does not apply to the specific project (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).

City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 3: Determination CHAPTER3 DETERMINATION

3.1 POTENTIALENVIRONMENTALIMPACTS
As indicated by the discussionsof existing and baseline conditions, and impact analyses that follow in this Chapter, environmental factors not checked below would have no impacts or less than significant impacts resulting from the project. Environmental factors that are. checked below would havepotentially significant impacts resulting from the project. Mitigation measures are recommended for each of the potentially significant impacts that would reduce the impact to less than significant. |:| Aesthetics |:| Agriculture and Forestry D Air Quality Resources
IE Biological Resources |:| Cultural Resources |:| Energy |:| Geology/Soils |:| Greenhouse GasEmissions |:| Hazardsand Hazardous Materials
|:| Hydrology/Water Quality |:| Land Use/Planning |:| Mineral Resources |:| Noise |:| Population/Housing |:| PublicServices
|:| Recreation |:| Transportation |:| Tribal Cultural Resources IE Utilities and ServiceSystems |:| Wildfire |:| Mandatory Findingsof Significance
The analysesof environmental impacts in Chapter 4 Impact Analysisresult in an impact statement, which shall have the following meanings.

Potentially Significant Impact. This category is applicable ifthere is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant, and no feasible mitigation measures can be identified to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. If there are one or more ”Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIRis required.

Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. This category applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures would reduce an effect from a ”Potentially Significant Impact” to a ”Less than Significant Impact.” The lead agencymust describe the mitigation measure(s),and briefly explain how they would reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from earlier analysesmay be cross-referenced).

Lessthan Significant Impact.This category is identified when the proposed Project would result in impacts below the threshold of significance, and no mitigation measuresare required.

No Impact. Thiscategory applies when a project would not create an impact in the specific environmental issuearea. "No Impact” answersdo not require a detailed explanation if they are adequately supported by the information sourcescited by the lead agency,which show that the impact does not apply to the specific project (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone).A ”No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project—specific factors as well asgeneral standards (e.g. the project will not exposesensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project—specific screening analysis). \MMNprovostondpritchard.com 3-1
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 3: Determination
www.provostandpritchard.com 3-2

3.2 DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation (to be completed by the Lead Agency):

I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.

I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets.

An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. _______________________________________ _____________________________ Signature Date
Jeffrey O’Neal, City Planner
_______________________________________
Printed Name/Position
August 27, 2026
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 3: Determination

3.2 DETERMINATION
On the basisof this initial evaluation (to be completed by the LeadAgency):

D
&
|find that the proposed project COULDNOThave a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
|find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATEDNEGATIVEDECLARATIONwill be prepared. | find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTis required.
| find that the proposed project MAY have a ”potentially significant impact” or ”potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzedin an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,and 2) hasbeen addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysisas described on attached sheets.

An ENVlRONIVIENTALIMPACTREPORTis required, but it must analyzeonly the effects that remain to be addressed.

I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVEDECLARATIONpursuant to applicable standards,and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVEDECLARATION,including revisions or mitigation measures Auqust 27, 2026
Date
Printed Name/Position
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 3-2
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-1
CHAPTER 4 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

4.1 AESTHETICS
Table 4-1: Aesthetics Impacts
Except as provided in Public
Resources Code Section 21099,
would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Have substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or
quality of public views of the site and its
surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point). If the project
is in an urbanized area, would the
project conflict with applicable zoning
and other regulations governing scenic
quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light
or glare which would adversely affect
day or nighttime views in the area?

4.1.1 BASELINE CONDITIONS
The Project is located adjacent to the City within Fresno County. The site is surrounded by vacant and agricultural land to the north, west, and south, and residential land to the east. Regional views from the Project site are generally limited due to the flat landscape, but the Coastal Mountain Range is visible to the west. There are no City designated scenic vistas on the Project site or in the vicinity. There are no designated State Scenic Highways within the City or the surrounding area.3

4.1 AESTHETICS
Table 4-1: Aesthetics lm cts
‘ O O O O O ‘ O O O ‘ O O O ‘ O
‘ o ‘ o o ‘ ‘ o I' ' o o o o o o o
O O ‘ O O ‘ O O O O O O O
O O O ‘ 8) Have substantial adverse effect on a El El El IE scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock El El El '2
outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
C) In non—urbanizedareas, substantially
degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views ofthe site and its surroundings? (Public views are those
that are experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point). lfthe project D El '2 CI
is in an urbanized area, would the
project conflict with applicable zoning
and other regulations governing scenic
quality?
d) Create a new source ofsubstantial light or glare which would adversely affect El El IE El day or nighttime views in the area?

4.1.1 BASELINECONDITIONS
The Project is located adjacent to the City within Fresno County. The site is surrounded by vacant and agricultural land to the north, west, and south, and residential land to the east. Regional views from the Project site are generally limited due to the flat landscape,but the CoastalMountain Rangeis visible to the west. There are no City designated scenicvistason the Project site or in the vicinity. There are no designated State ScenicHighways within the City or the surrounding area.3

4.1.2 IMPACT ANALYSIS
a) Have substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
No Impact. As stated above, there are views of the Coastal Mountain Range viewable from the Project site to the west. The Project would result in the construction of 271 single-family residences that may partially block existing views of these mountains; however, neither the County nor the City have any designated scenic corridors, protected vistas, or policies regulating development in scenic areas.45 Therefore, there would be no impact.
3(California Department of Transportation, 2024)
4(City of Mendota, 2009)
5(County of Fresno, 2024)
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 4-1
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-2
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact. The nearest State scenic highway to the Project site, State Route (SR) 168, is located approximately 36 miles east of the Project site.
6 SR 168 would not be visible from the Project site, nor would the Project be visible from SR 168. Therefore, there would be no impact. c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would result in the annexation and prezoning of two parcels to the City. Subsequent to these actions, construction of the proposed residences, and roadways would be required to meet all applicable City development standards. Construction of the 271 single-family residences would be developed in a manner that would not degrade the existing visual character, and would be consistent with the character of the neighboring residential development. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less Than Significant Impact. The Project includes the development of 271 single-family residences adjacent to an existing neighborhood. While the residences would introduce new light in the Project site, the development of the subdivision abuts similar existing development. Additionally, the Project site is planned for residential development by the City’s General Plan. Prior to construction a lighting plan would be required to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
6 (California Department of Transportation, 2024)
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
No Impact. The nearest State scenic highway to the Project site, State Route (SR)168,is located approximately 36 miles east of the Project site.6SR168 would not be visible from the Project site, nor would the Project be visible from SR168. Therefore, there would be no impact. c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
LessThanSignificant Impact. The Project would result in the annexation and prezoning of two parcels to the City. Subsequent to these actions, construction of the proposed residences, and roadways would be required to meet all applicable City development standards. Construction of the 271 single—family residences would be developed in a manner that would not degrade the existing visual character, and would be consistent with the character of the neighboring residential development. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
LessThan Significant Impact. The Project includes the development of 271 single-family residences adjacent to an existing neighborhood. While the residenceswould introduce new light in the Project site, the development of the subdivision abuts similar existing development. Additionally, the Project site is planned for residential development by the City’sGeneral Plan.Prior to construction a lighting plan would be required to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
6(California Department of Transportation, 2024)
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 4-2
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-3

4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
Table 4-2: Agriculture and Forest Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance
(Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural
use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion
of forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to non-forest use?

4.2.1 BASELINE CONDITIONS
The Project site is currently located in Fresno County, west of the City of Mendota city limits and SOI. Fresno County, and the larger San Joaquin Valley as a whole, is one of the largest producers of agricultural products in the world and relies on its agricultural industry to support the regional economy. The Project site is currently vacant.

The California Department of Conservation’s (DOC) 2012 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) is a non-regulatory program that produces "Important Farmland" maps and statistical data used for analyzing impacts on California’s agricultural resources. The Important Farmland maps identify eight land use categories, five of which are agriculture related: prime farmland, farmland of Statewide importance, unique farmland, farmland of local importance, and grazing land – rated according to soil quality and irrigation status. The eight categories are summarized below:
7 • PRIME FARMLAND (P): Farmland with the best combination of physical and chemical features able to sustain long term agricultural production. This land has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained high yields. Land must have been used for irrigated agricultural production at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date. • FARMLAND OF STATEWIDE IMPORTANCE (S): Farmland similar to Prime Farmland but with minor shortcomings, such as greater slopes or less ability to store soil moisture. Land must have been 7 (California Department of Conservation, 2022)
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis

4.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRYRESOURCES
Table 4—2: riculture and Forest Im cts
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared El El IE El
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California
ResourcesAgency, to non—agriculturaluse?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural El El IE El use, or a Williamson Act contract?
C) Conflict with existingzoningfor, or cause
rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public
ResourcesCode section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public ResourcesCode section El El El IX 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code
section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the lossof forest land or conversion El El El IX of forest land to non—forestuse?
6) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of El El IXI El Farmland, to non—agriculturaluse or conversion of forest land to non—forestuse?

4.2.1 BASELINECONDITIONS
TheProject site is currently located in FresnoCounty, west ofthe City of Mendota city limits and SOI.Fresno County, and the larger SanJoaquinValley asa whole, isone ofthe largest producers ofagricultural products in the world and relies on its agricultural industry to support the regional economy. The Project site is currently vacant.

The California Department of Conservation’s (DOC) 2012 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) is a non-regulatory program that produces ”Important Farmland” maps and statistical data used for analyzing impacts on California’s agricultural resources. The Important Farmland maps identify eight land use categories, five of which are agriculture related: prime farmland, farmland of Statewide importance, unique farmland, farmland of local importance, and grazing land —rated according to soil quality and irrigation status. The eight categories are summarized below:7 o PRIMEFARMLAND(P): Farmland with the best combination of physicaland chemical features able to sustain long term agricultural production. This land has the soil quality, growing season, and moisture supply needed to produce sustained high yields. Landmust have been used for irrigated agricultural production at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date. 0 FARMLAND OF STATEWIDE IMPORTANCE (S): Farmland similar to Prime Farmland but with minor shortcomings, such as greater slopes or less ability to store soil moisture. Land must have been 7(California Department of Conservation, 2022)
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 4—3
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-4
used for irrigated agricultural production at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date.
• UNIQUE FARMLAND (U): Farmland of lesser quality soils used for the production of the State's leading agricultural crops. This land is usually irrigated but may include non- irrigated orchards or vineyards as found in some climatic zones in California. Land must have been cropped at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date.
• FARMLAND OF LOCAL IMPORTANCE (L): Land of importance to the local agricultural economy as determined by each county's board of supervisors and a local advisory committee. • GRAZING LAND (G): Land on which the existing vegetation is suited to the grazing of livestock. The minimum mapping unit for Grazing Land is 40 acres.
• URBAN AND BUILT-UP LAND (D): Land occupied by structures with a building density of at least 1 unit to 1.5 acres, or approximately 6 structures to a 10-acre parcel. This land is used for residential, industrial, commercial, institutional, public administrative purposes, railroad and other transportation yards, cemeteries, airports, golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment, water control structures, and other developed purposes.
• OTHER LAND (X): Land not included in any other mapping category. Common examples include low density rural developments; brush, timber, wetland, and riparian areas not suitable for livestock grazing; confined livestock, poultry or aquaculture facilities; strip mines, borrow pits; and water bodies smaller than 40 acres. Vacant and non-agricultural land surrounded on all sides by urban development and greater than 40 acres is mapped as Other Land. • WATER (W): Perennial water bodies with an extent of at least 40 acres.

The DOC identifies the site as consisting of land that is Farmland of Local Importance (see Figure 4-1). 8 No
Williamson Act contract parcels exist on the site.9

4.2.2 IMPACT ANALYSIS
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the Project site is designated as Farmland of Local Importance by the FMMP. The Project would result in the conversion of this land to a non-agricultural use, however the site is planned for residential uses by the City of Mendota. No land designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance would be impacted by the Project and the conversion of the land use on the site. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is currently zoned AE-20 (Exclusive Agriculture) by the County of Fresno and is not subject to a Williamson Act contract. 10 The Project proposes to amend the
existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN 012-190-25ST to Medium Density Residential. Concurrently, it would amend the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN 012-190-25ST to the R-1 zone district, ensuring consistency with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan designation. The Project would also prezone APN 012-160-25ST to the P-F zone district which is consistent with the current Public Facility General Plan land use designation. Although the Project would 8 (California Department of Conservation, 2022)
9 (California Department of Conservation, 2025)
10 Ibid.

City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis used for irrigated agricultural production at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date.
0 UNIQUEFARMLAND(U): Farmland of lesser quality soils used for the production of the State's leading agricultural crops. This land is usually irrigated but may include non- irrigated orchards or vineyards asfound in some climatic zonesin California. Landmust have been cropped at some time during the four years prior to the mapping date.
0 FARMLANDOFLOCALIMPORTANCE(L): Land of importance to the local agricultural economy as determined by each county's board of supervisors and a local advisory committee. 0 GRAZINGLAND(G): Landon which the existing vegetation is suited to the grazing of livestock. The minimum mapping unit for Grazing Landis 40 acres.
0 URBANAND BUILT—UPLAND(D): Land occupied by structures with a building density of at least 1 unit to 1.5 acres,or approximately 6 structures to a 10—acreparcel. This land is used for residential, industrial, commercial, institutional, public administrative purposes, railroad and other transportation yards, cemeteries, airports, golf courses, sanitary landfills, sewage treatment, water control structures, and other developed purposes.
0 OTHERLAND(X): Landnot included in any other mapping category. Common examplesinclude low density rural developments; brush, timber, wetland, and riparian areas not suitable for livestock grazing; confined livestock, poultry or aquaculture facilities; strip mines, borrow pits; and water bodies smaller than 40 acres. Vacant and non—agricultural|and surrounded on all sides by urban development and greater than 40 acres is mapped asOther Land. 0 WATER(W): Perennial water bodies with an extent of at least 40 acres.

The DOCidentifies the site as consisting of land that is Farmland of LocalImportance (seeFigure 4-1).8No Williamson Act contract parcels exist on the site.9

4.2.2 IMPACTANALYSIS
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the Project site is designated as Farmland of Local Importance by the FIVIIVIP.The Project would result in the conversion of this land to a non—agricultural use, however the site is planned for residential usesby the City ofMendota. Noland designated asPrime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance would be impacted by the Project and the conversion of the land use on the site. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is currently zoned AE-ZO(ExclusiveAgriculture) by the County of Fresno and is not subject to a Williamson Act contract.10The Project proposes to amend the existing Low Density Residential land use designation for APN 012-190-255T to Medium Density Residential. Concurrently, it would amend the City’s Official Zoning Map to prezone APN012—190—255T to the R-l zone district, ensuring consistency with the proposed Medium Density Residential General Plan designation. The Project would also prezone APN012—160-ZSST to the P-Fzone district which is consistent with the current PublicFacilityGeneral Planland use designation. Although the Project would 8(California Department of Conservation, 2022)
9 (California Department of Conservation, 2025)
10Ibid.

WANprovostondpritchard.com 4-4
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-5
convert land currently zoned for agriculture to R-1 and P-F, the proposed prezoning promotes consistency with the proposed General Plan land use designation. While the Project would result in the conversion of this agriculturally zoned land to a non-agricultural zone district and use, the eventual conversion of this land to a non-agricultural use was previously analyzed as a part of the City’s General Plan. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. The site is currently zoned AE-20 (Exclusive Agriculture) by the County and would be prezoned R-1 and P-F as a part of the Project. Additionally, no forest or timberland exists on the site. Therefore, there would be no impact. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to nonforest use as forest land does not exist within the Project site. The site consists of vacant property adjacent to existing single family development to the east of the site. Therefore, there would be no impact.
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which due to their location or nature, would result in the conversion of farmland to a non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. As discussed above, the Project would result in the loss of Farmland of Local Importance but would not result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The Project would involve developing residential uses on land already designated for residential uses by the City’s General Plan. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis convert land currently zoned for agriculture to R—1and P-F, the proposed prezoning promotes consistency with the proposed General Plan land use designation. While the Project would result in the conversion of this agriculturally zoned land to a non—agriculturalzone district and use, the eventual conversion of this land to a non—agriculturaluse was previously analyzed as a part of the City’s General Plan.Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or causerezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public ResourcesCode section 12220(g)), timberland (asdefined by Public ResourcesCodesection 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. The Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. The site is currently zoned AE-ZO(Exclusive Agriculture) by the County and would be prezoned R—1and P—F as a part of the Project. Additionally, no forest or timberland exists on the site. Therefore, there would be no impact. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact.The Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to nonforest use as forest land does not exist within the Project site. The site consists of vacant property adjacent to existing single family development to the east of the site. Therefore, there would be no impact.
e) Involve other changesin the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not involve other changes in the existing environment which due to their location or nature, would result in the conversion of farmland to a non—agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non—forestuse. As discussedabove, the Project would result in the loss of Farmland of Local Importance but would not result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The Project would involve developing residential uses on land already designated for residential uses by the City’s General Plan.Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
\MMNprovostondpritchard.com 4—5
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-6

Figure 4-1: Farmland Designation Map
City of Mendota
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis August 2026
_:\ ‘ ‘\“'; ':\
g* 5t
V -._I—.—.— ————— .—&—‘ fl " ‘- fiGonzalezSf] . H r r .1l "h \_: . 'I 3 {I 'A '| : l'; a. _.- " “: :1“. ftp}: ‘ - .'-'.‘ ‘\_ j ‘1'? .I9 E- '."""I ”4'4,‘_ ’ .1}. _i -Qg‘,;ulu'. a’:.t 4" . ’ r: yigfl j'y. _~ _4 3 2" fl x .3 n A ' ”,4 21,354; “5"‘(1‘4‘1‘ .1 _a .u I
ll!” {1'} '-.. .H-'- :l “fly-f" .h J“ 'énz' r
'II in .5 l 5:, .‘ fl -.I 6 b"
.‘ n . _ 5“] :Id ‘ u
if C‘ J 3". w‘v-rrgcrw II_‘. SilvaSf 4”“ J
Jufi
[Ingwp turn-v ‘
t: w‘ ‘Black‘lAve. {-31':
air; 7 H“! : fi 'j‘"
li:‘.;'l?ila1"‘4‘-'_ {Hutu u- 'Hfi sub‘"
II..‘IIE1!1"F
I.It};l“i:ql pin
II
I :Cfi jo
_ve . Am'adbf—iAve--
J ' Oxnarda ‘ " KW»...
‘I’:'-:.."VT:'.L?J 1
‘ 1{I
.1
I. IP-
‘3 ": :5;' I i "
.. yr,. : ‘3:

I . § 1
I F“ E Project Site ' r:- _ _ _' l .. u_ __] MendotaCityLimit » .1 i . r_-_-_! Mendota CitySOI ' L W___ _ F}. _
' ' _ . 'T ”ntg'A'Kggg-ES-a
! WilliamsonAct
FarmlandDesignation
Farmland of Statewide Importance
Farmland of Local Importance
Rural Residential
Urban and Built—UpLand
0 500 1.000 Farmland Map —:I
Feet City of Mendota - VestingTentativeMap No.6541
imam}kiEgnyicDriue\Cllcnts\Menduta_Cityuf-3335\3_336Dru-GoingPlanningSewlues\GI5\2026_OnGotng\WM5541\V'I'M_554-1.apn( Figure 4-1: Farmland Designation Map WANprovostondpritchard.com
ir H
t 15.?! 1:33;}
5 p3
.4.
all-2' _.y -
an, ("_ . :‘fl‘t .
. hr?” {.‘H‘H -332; __ _‘. ~v_2 1mm {.5«w
~
am" 7‘13

PROVOST&

PRITCHARD
4—6
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-7

4.3 AIR QUALITY
Table 4-3: Air Quality Impacts
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation
of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?

4.3.1 BASELINE CONDITIONS
The Project site is located within the boundaries of the SJVAPCD and the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB). The SJVAB is positioned within the San Joaquin Valley of California. The San Joaquin Valley is bounded by the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range to the east and the Coastal Mountain Range to the west.

Wind within the SJVAB typically channels south-southwest during the summer months, while wind flows to the north-northwest during the winter months. Wind velocity for the region is considered low for an area of such size.11 Due to a lack of strong wind and the natural confinement of the mountain ranges surrounding the SJVAB, the region experiences some of the worst air quality in the world.

Regulatory Attainment Designations
Under the California Clean Air Act (CCAA), the California Air Resources Board (CARB) is required to designate areas of the State as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassified with respect to applicable standards. An “attainment” designation for an area signifies that pollutant concentrations did not violate the applicable standard in that area. A “nonattainment” designation indicates that a pollutant concentration violated the applicable standard at least once, excluding those occasions when a violation was caused by an exceptional event, as defined in the criteria. Depending on the frequency and severity of pollutants exceeding applicable standards, the nonattainment designation can be further classified as serious nonattainment, severe nonattainment, or extreme nonattainment, with extreme nonattainment being the most severe of the classifications. An “unclassified” designation signifies that the data does not support either an attainment or nonattainment designation. The CCAA divides districts into moderate, serious, and severe air pollution categories, with increasingly stringent control requirements mandated for each category.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) designates areas for ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) as “does not meet the primary standards,” “cannot be classified,” or “better than national standards.” For Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), areas are designated as “does not meet the primary standards,” “does not meet the secondary standards,” “cannot be classified,” or “better than national standards.” However, the CARB terminology of attainment, nonattainment, and unclassified is more frequently used. The USEPA uses the same subcategories for nonattainment status: serious, severe, 11 (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 2026) City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis

4.3 AIR QUALITY
Table4—3:AirQua| Im cts
O ‘ O O O ‘ O
O O ‘ O O ‘ O O O O O O O

O O O O O O O
O O O ‘ 8) Conflict with or obstruct implementation El El IXI CI of the applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for
which the project region is non— El I:| IE |:|
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? C) Exposesensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those
leading to odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of people?

4.3.1 BASELINECONDITIONS
The Project site is located within the boundaries of the SJVAPCDand the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin (SJVAB).The SJVABis positioned within the San Joaquin Valley of California. The San Joaquin Valley is bounded by the Sierra Nevada Mountain Range to the east and the CoastalMountain Range to the west.

Wind within the SJVABtypically channels south—southwest during the summer months, while wind flows to the north-northwest during the winter months. Wind velocity for the region is considered low for an area of suchsize.11Dueto a lackof strong wind and the natural confinement ofthe mountain rangessurrounding the SJVAB,the region experiences some of the worst air quality in the world.

Regulatory Attainment Designations
Under the California CleanAir Act (CCAA),the California Air ResourcesBoard (CARB)is required to designate areas of the State as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassified with respect to applicable standards. An ”attainment” designation for an area signifies that pollutant concentrations did not violate the applicable standard in that area. A ”nonattainment” designation indicates that a pollutant concentration violated the applicable standard at least once, excluding those occasionswhen a violation was causedby an exceptional event, as defined in the criteria. Depending on the frequency and severity of pollutants exceeding applicable standards, the nonattainment designation can be further classified as serious nonattainment, severe nonattainment, or extreme nonattainment, with extreme nonattainment being the most severe of the classifications. An ”unclassified” designation signifies that the data does not support either an attainment or nonattainment designation. The CCAA divides districts into moderate, serious, and severe air pollution categories, with increasingly stringent control requirements mandated for each category.

The United StatesEnvironmental Protection Agency(USEPA)designatesareasfor ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), and Nitrogen Dioxide (N02) as ”does not meet the primary standards,” ”cannot be classified,” or ”better than national standards.” For Sulfur Dioxide ($02), areas are designated as ”does not meet the primary standards,” ”does not meet the secondary standards,” ”cannot be classified,” or ”better than national standards.” However, the CARBterminology of attainment, nonattainment, and unclassified is more frequently used.The USEPAuses the same subcategories for nonattainment status: serious, severe, 11(SanJoaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 2026) WANprovostondpritchard.com 4—7
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-8
and extreme. In 1991, USEPA assigned new nonattainment designations to areas that had previously been classified as Group I, II, or III for PM10 based on the likelihood that they would violate national PM10 standards. All other areas are designated “unclassified.” According to the USEPA, Fresno County was in non-attainment for two pollutant concentrations, with PM2.5 (2012) being classified as in serious non-attainment, and 8-hour Ozone (2015) classified as being in extreme non-attainment as of July 15, 2026.12
Table 4-4: Summary of Ambient Air Quality Standards and Attainment Designation Pollutant Averaging
Time
State
Standard
Federal
Standard
State
Attainment
Status
Federal
Attainment
Status
O3 1 hour 0.09 ppm N/A Nonattainment/
Severe
N/A
O3 8 hours 0.070 ppm 0.070 ppm
(4th highest in 3 years)
Nonattainment Nonattainment/
Extreme
CO 1 hour 20 ppm 35 ppm Attainment/
Unclassified
Attainment/
Unclassified
CO 8 hours 9.0 ppm 9 ppm Attainment/
Unclassified
Attainment/
Unclassified
PM10 24 hours 50 μg/m3 150 μg/m3
(expected number of
days above standard
< or equal to 1)
Nonattainment Attainment
PM10 Annual 20 μg/m3 N/A Nonattainment N/A
PM2.5 24 hours N/A 35 μg/m3 N/A Nonattainment
PM2.5 Annual 12 μg/m3 12.0 μg/m3 Nonattainment Nonattainment NO2 1 hour 0.18 ppm 0.100 ppm Attainment Attainment/
Unclassified
NO2 Annual 0.030 ppm 0.053 ppm Attainment Attainment/
Unclassified
SO2 1 hour 0.25 ppm 0.075 ppm
(99th percentile over 3
years)
Attainment Attainment/
Unclassified
SO2 3 hours N/A 0.5 ppm N/A Attainment/
Unclassified
SO2 24 hours 0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm Attainment Attainment/
Unclassified
SO2 Annual N/A 0.030 ppm N/A Attainment/
Unclassified
Pb Monthly 1.5 μg/m3 N/A Attainment N/A
Pb Rolling 3-month
average
N/A 0.15 μg/m3 N/A Attainment/
Unclassified
Sulfates 24 hours 25 μg/m3 N/A Attainment N/A
H2S 1 hour 0.03 ppm N/A Unclassified N/A
Visibility
Reducing
Particles (VRP)
8 hours Visibility of 10 miles
or more at relative
humidity less than 70
%
N/A Unclassified N/A
Vinyl Chloride 24 hours 0.01 ppm N/A Attainment N/A
* For more information on standards visit: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2024-08/AAQS%20Table_ADA_FINAL_07222024.pdf. ** No Federal 1-hour standard. Reclassified extreme nonattainment for the Federal 8-hour standard 7/15/2026. ***Secondary Standar2
Source: Ambient Air Quality Standards & Valley Attainment Status/ Valley Air District. Accessed 7/15/2026. 12 (United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2026) City of Mendota
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis August 2026
and extreme. In 1991,USEPA assignednew nonattainment designations to areasthat had previously been classified as Group I, II, or III for PMlo based on the likelihood that they would violate national PMlo standards. All other areasare designated ”unclassified.” Accordingto the USEPA,FresnoCountywas in non—attainmentfor two pollutant concentrations, with PM2_5 (2012) being classifiedas in serious non—attainment,and 8—hourOzone(2015) classifiedasbeing in extreme non—attainment as of July15, 2026.12
03 CO
CO
PM10
PM10
PM2.5
PM2.5
N02
N02
5 02
S 02
5 02 S 02
Pb
Pb
Sulfates H25 Visibility
Reducing
Particles (VRP)
Vinyl Chloride
* For more information on standards visit: https://ww2.arb.ca.qov/sites/defau/t/fi/es/2024—08/AAQS%20Tab/e ADA FINAL 07222024.pdf.

Table 4-4: Summa
1 hour
8 hours 1 hour
8 hours
24 hours
Annual
24 hours
Annual 1 hour Annual 1 hour
3 hours 24 hours Annual Month/y
Rolling 3—month
average
24 hours 1 hour
8 hours
24 hours
of Ambient Air Qual o - - o ‘ o
o o o o 0.09 ppm N/A

0.070 ppm 0.070 ppm
(4th highest in 3 years) 20 ppm 35 ppm

9.0 ppm 9 ppm
50 ug/m3 150 ug/m3
(expected number of
days above standard < or equal to 1)
20 ,ug/m3 N/A
N/A 35ug/m3
12 [lg/m3 12.0 ug/m3

0.18 ppm 0.100 ppm

0.030 ppm 0.053 ppm

0.25 ppm 0.075 ppm
(99" percentile over 3
years)
N/A 0.5 ppm

0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm N/A 0.030 ppm

1.5 [lg/m3 N/A
N/A 0.15Mg/m3
25 ug/m3 N/A

0.03 ppm N/A
Visibility of 10 miles N/A
or more at relative
humidity lessthan 70
%

0.01 ppm N/A
Nonattainment/ Severe Nonattainment Attainment/
Unclassified
Attainment/
Unclassified Nonattainment
Nonattainment N/A Nonattainment Attainment Attainment Attainment N/A
Attainment N/A
Attainment N/A
Attainment Unclassified
Unclassified
Attainment
** N0 Federal l—hour standard. Reclassified extreme nonattainmentfor the Federal 8—hour standard 7/15/2026. ** *Secondary StandarZ Source: Ambient Air Quality Standards & Valley Attainment Status/ Valley Air District. Accessed 7/15/2026. 12(
WANprovostondpritchard.com
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2026)
Standards and Attainment Desi nation
N/A
Nonattainment/ Extreme Attainment/
Unclassified
Attainment/
Unclassified Attainment
N/A
Nonattainment Nonattainment Attainment/
Unclassified
Attainment/
Unclassified
Attainment/
Unclassified
Attainment/
Unclassified
Attainment/
Unclassified
Attainment/
Unclassified
N/A
Attainment/
Unclassified
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4—8
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-9
Construction Generated Emissions
Construction of the Project is assumed to be completed over approximately 4.5 years. Emissions associated with the Project were calculated using the CalEEMod Air Quality Model, Version 2022.1.1.43 (California Emissions Estimator Modeling). The emissions modeling includes emissions generated by offroad equipment, haul trucks, and worker commute trips. Emissions were quantified based on anticipated construction schedules and the default parameters contained in the model. Localized air quality impacts associated with the Project would be minor and were qualitatively assessed. Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix A.

Thresholds of Significance
Air pollutant emissions have regional effects and localized effects. This analysis assesses the regional effects of the Project’s criteria pollutant emissions in comparison to SJVAPCD thresholds of significance for shortterm construction activities and long-term operation of the Project. Localized emissions from Project construction and operation are also assessed using concentration-based thresholds that determine if the Project would result in a localized exceedance of any ambient air quality standards or would make a cumulatively considerable contribution to an existing exceedance.

The primary pollutants of concern during Project construction and operation are ROG (reactive organic gases), NOX, PM10, and PM2.5. The SJVAPCD Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts, adopted in 2015, contains thresholds for ROG and Nitrogen Oxides (NOX); Sulfur Oxides (SOX), CO, PM10, and PM2.5. 13 Ozone is a secondary pollutant that can be formed miles away from the source of emissions through reactions of ROG and NOX emissions in the presence of sunlight. Therefore, ROG and NOx are termed ozone precursors. The SJVAB often exceeds the State and national ozone standards. Therefore, if the Project emits a substantial quantity of ozone precursors, the Project may contribute to an exceedance of the ozone standard. The SJVAB also exceeds air quality standards for PM10, and PM2.5; therefore, substantial Project emissions may contribute to an exceedance for these pollutants.

The SJVAPCD adopted significance thresholds for construction-related and operational ROG, NOX, PM, CO, and SOX, these thresholds are included in Table 4-5.

Table 4-5: Project-Level Air Quality CEQA Thresholds of Significance Pollutant
Significance Threshold
Construction Emissions
(tons/year)
Operational Emissions
(tons/year)
CO 100 100
NOx 10 10
ROG 10 10
SOx 27 27
PM10 15 15
PM2.5 15 15
Source: SJVAPCD. 2015. Guidance for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. Website:
https://www.valleyair.org/media/g4nl3p0g/gamaqi.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2026.

Short-Term Construction Generation Emissions
Estimated construction-generation emissions are summarized in Table 4-6. 13 (San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 2015) City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis Construction Generated Emissions
Construction ofthe Project is assumedto be completed over approximately 4.5 years. Emissionsassociated with the Project were calculated using the CalEElVIodAir Quality Model, Version 2022.1.1.43 (California Emissions Estimator Modeling). The emissions modeling includes emissions generated by offroad equipment, haul trucks, and worker commute trips. Emissions were quantified based on anticipated construction schedules and the default parameters contained in the model. Localizedair quality impacts associated with the Project would be minor and were qualitatively assessed.Modeling assumptions and output files are included in Appendix A.

Thresholdsof Significance
Air pollutant emissionshave regional effects and localizedeffects. Thisanalysisassessesthe regional effects of the Project’s criteria pollutant emissions in comparison to SJVAPCD thresholds of significance for shortterm construction activities and long—termoperation of the Project. Localized emissions from Project construction and operation are also assessedusing concentration-based thresholds that determine if the Project would result in a localized exceedance of any ambient air quality standards or would make a cumulatively considerable contribution to an existing exceedance.

The primary pollutants of concern during Project construction and operation are ROG (reactive organic gases),NOX,PMlo,and PI\/|2_5.The SJVAPCDGuide for Assessingand Mitigating Air Quality Impacts, adopted in 2015,contains thresholds for ROG and Nitrogen Oxides (NOX); Sulfur Oxides (SOx),CO, PMlo,and P|\/|2_5.13 Ozone is a secondary pollutant that can be formed miles away from the source of emissions through reactions of ROGand NOxemissionsin the presence of sunlight. Therefore, ROGand NOXare termed ozone precursors.TheSJVABoften exceedsthe State and national ozone standards.Therefore, ifthe Project emits a substantial quantity of ozone precursors, the Project may contribute to an exceedance of the ozone standard. The SJVABalso exceedsair quality standards for PM10,and PM25;therefore, substantial Project emissions may contribute to an exceedancefor these pollutants.

The SJVAPCDadopted significance thresholds for construction—related and operational ROG, NOX, PM, CO, and SOX,these thresholds are included in Table 4-5.

Table 4-5: Pro'ect-Level Air Quali CEQAThresholds of Si ificance CO 100 100
NOX 10 10
ROG 10 10
50x 27 27
PMlo 15 15
PM25 15 15
Source: SJVAPCD.2015. Guidance for Assessingand Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. Website:
https://www.va||evair.org/media/g4nl3pOg/gamaqi.pdf. AccessedJuly 15, 2026.

Short-Term Construction Generation Emissions
Estimated construction—generation emissions are summarized in Table 4-6. 13(SanJoaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, 2015) \MMNprovostondpritchard.com 4-9
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-10
Table 4-6:Unmitigated Short-Term Construction Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants Source
Annual Emissions (Tons per Year)
ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Annual Project
Construction Emissions

1.67 2.70 3.08 0.01 0.41 0.22
SJVAPCD Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Long-Term Operational Generated Emissions
Estimated operational-generated emissions are summarized in Table 4-7.

Table 4-7: Unmitigated Long-Term Operational Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants Source
Annual Emissions (Tons per Year)
ROG NOX CO SOX PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Annual Project
Operational Emissions

3.81 2.36 17.95 0.05 4.24 1.12
SJVAPCD Threshold 10 10 100 27 15 15
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No

4.3.2 IMPACT ANALYSIS
a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of any applicable air quality plan. The proposed Project would not exceed any threshold for air quality emissions that has been set by the SJVAPCD. Therefore, there would be no impact. b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non-attainment. As shown in Table 4-5, Table 4-6, and Table 4-7 the Project would not exceed an emissions threshold which has been set by the SJVAPCD for construction or operational related emissions. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the proposed Project would not result in significant long-term operational emissions. Constructed related emissions, shown in Table 4-6, would be temporary in nature and would cease upon Project construction. Short-term construction activities, however, could result in temporary increases in pollutant concentrations that could impact nearby sensitive receptors.

Sensitive Receptors are groups that would be more affected by air, noise, and light pollution, pesticides, and other toxic chemicals than others. This includes infants, children under 16, elderly over 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. High concentrations of these groups would include daycares, residential areas, hospitals, elder care facilities, schools and parks. While the Project would be located in an area near sensitive receptors, such as the residential neighborhoods to the east of the site, the Project would not exceed the daily emission thresholds set by the SJVAPCD. The HARP2 Air Dispersion Model was run for the Project to show the health risk the Project would have on sensitive receptors in the area. The model run, which can be viewed in Appendix A, indicates that the Project would City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis Table 4—62Unm ted Short-Term Construction Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants Maximum Annual Project 1.67 2.70 3.08 0.01 0.41 0.22
Construction Emissions |
SJVAPCDThreshold 10 10 100 27 15 15 +
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No
Long-Term Operational Generated Emissions
Estimated operational—generatedemissionsare summarized in Table 4-7.

Table 4—7:Unm ted Lon -Term 0 rational Generated Emissions of Criteria Air Pollutants Maximum Annual Project 3.81 2.36 17.95 0.05 4.24 1.12
Operational Emissions |
SJVAPCDThreshold 10 10 100 27 15 15 fl
Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No

4.3.2 IMPACT ANALYSIS
a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less than Significant Impact. The Project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of any applicable air quality plan. The proposed Project would not exceedany threshold for air quality emissions that has been set by the SJVAPCD.Therefore, there would be no impact. b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? Lessthan Significant Impact. The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is in non—attainment.As shown in Table 4-5, Table 4—6, and Table 4-7 the Project would not exceed an emissions threshold which has been set by the SJVAPCD for construction or operational related emissions.Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less than Significant Impact. As discussedabove, the proposed Project would not result in significant long-term operational emissions.Constructed related emissions,shown in Table 4-6, would be temporary in nature and would cease upon Project construction. Short—term construction activities, however, could result in temporary increases in pollutant concentrations that could impact nearby sensitive receptors.

Sensitive Receptors are groups that would be more affected by air, noise, and light pollution, pesticides, and other toxic chemicals than others. This includes infants, children under 16, elderly over 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.High concentrations of these groups would include daycares, residential areas, hospitals, elder care facilities, schools and parks. While the Project would be located in an area near sensitive receptors, such as the residential neighborhoods to the east of the site, the Project would not exceed the daily emission thresholds set by the SJVAPCD.The HARPZ Air Dispersion Model was run for the Project to show the health risk the Project would have on sensitive receptors in the area.The model run, which can be viewed in Appendix A, indicates that the Project would \MMNprovostondpritchard.com 4—10
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-11
result in a cancer risk of 9.3 in one million, which is less than the SJVAPCD’s threshold of 20 in one million.

The Project would also present a chronic risk of 0.00374 in one million and an acute risk of 0 in one million, which would be less than the SJVAPCD’s threshold of one in one million for both chronic and acute risk. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Less than Significant Impact. During construction activities, construction equipment exhaust, application of asphalt, structural coating, and other construction applications would temporarily emit odors. While the Project would be constructed adjacent to existing residential development to the east of the Project site, construction of the Project would be temporary, and odors would not remain after Project completion. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541 Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis result in a cancer risk of 9.3 in one million, which is less than the SJVAPCD’s threshold of 20 in one million.

The Project would also present a chronic risk of 0.00374 in one million and an acute risk of Oin one million, which would be less than the SJVAPCD’s threshold of one in one million for both chronic and acute risk. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Less than Significant Impact. During construction activities, construction equipment exhaust, application of asphalt, structural coating, and other construction applications would temporarily emit odors. While the Project would be constructed adjacent to existing residential development to the east of the Project site, construction of the Project would be temporary, and odors would not remain after Project completion. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. \MMNprovostondpritchard.com 4-11
City of Mendota August 2026
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 6541
Chapter 4: Environmental Impact Analysis
www.provostandpritchard.com 4-12

Mendota City CouncilOctober 6, 2026

Mendota City Council
October 6, 2026