Cities Index.
Agenda packet, first session

Menifee City Council
April 17, 2024

Document
Agenda packet, first session
Meeting
April 17, 2024
Body
Menifee City Council
Pages
64
Original file
244.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on cityofmenifee.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

"A. 3% credit card fee will be added to all credit card payments". Please Note:

No credits will be issued after 30 da}'_s, from invoice date.

Rental and Sales:
$2,965.70
Total Amount: $3,062.74
951-246-3313 Phone
Mon. Fri 7:00-4:00 Closed Sat.Sun
PMlitd011TtluMGfl023 fG:12:«PM
ENV:
$96.60
Total Paid
Any Damages To Be Billed On Separate Invoice.

WWW.SUMMITRENTALS.NET
Software byPolnt,cr.Ranllll SOflWlrt WWW,po!nl•Clt•Mnhll,C(lm $0.00
Menifee= 8.75%:
$0.44
Total Duo: $3,062.74
951-382-3500 Fax
Modlficallon #7
COl\ltoct,Par1:mt..SOL.(fl1(10)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 61

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
280 of 1244

Peoo 1 of3
RnmltTo:

SUMMIT EQUIPMENT RENTAL
26105 SHERMAN ROAD
MENIFEE, CA 92585
WWW.SUMMITRENTALS.NET
Customer#: 5168

RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC
PO BOX 1146
Riverside. CA 92502
Ordered By: CARL
Invoice
Closed I Invoice#
Thu 6/1512023 75956-1
Job Descr. MENIFEE· ANTELOPE RD
Date Out Fri 5112/2023
Terms Aging Date
NET30 Thu 6/1512023
Sales Representative: Marto Martinez 951-60-6-1594 [email protected] Delivery Fri 5/12/2023 7:00AM
CARL SHORT 909-772-8140
ANTELOPE RD· HOLLAND RD

ANTELOPE RD

MENIFEE
Right next to freeway
!elope rd and Holland rd
Qty Koy ttomc Sor#
Pickup Tue 6/13/2023
CARL SHORT 909-n2-8140
ANTELOPE RD· HOLLAND RD

ANTELOPE RD

MENIFEE
Statua Ratumod Dato
1 87481130 EXCAVATOR MINI· 10.000/l YMRZ45Y6EHAJ00831 Returned Mon 611212023 4:00PM GEHL
Motor Out 14B2.4 Meter In: 14Bfl.1 Total hours on meter: 5.7 1day$320,0O 1weekS960.00 4waoksS2,4OO.00
CaRad on #142897 on 6/6/2023 tor 819/2023

ANY EQUIPMENT DAMAGES TO BE BILLED ON SEPARATE INVOICE
1 PROPTAX CA, PROPERTY TAX REIMBURSEMENT FEE Puffod
1 88362218 36" ZA5 EXCAVATOR BUCKET 257080-7-1 Rotumod Mon 6/1212023 4:00PM Ca Red on #142697 on 618/2023 for 819/2023

ANY EQUIPMENT DAMAGES TO BE BILLED ON SEPARATE INVOICE
1 PROPTAX CA. PROPERTY TAX REIMBURSEMENT FEE Pulled
1 88181840 18"ZAS EXCAVATOR BUCKET Rclumed Mon 6112/2023 4:00PM tday $40,00 1waok $120.00 4wecko $360,00
Called Off #142897 on 6/S/2023 ror 819/2023

ANY EQUIPMENT DAMAGES TO BE BILLED ON SEPARATE INVOICE
1 PROPTAX CA. PROPERTY TAX REIMBURSEMENT FEE Pulled
1 !RETURN FEE RIV. RETURN FEE RIVERSIDE Sold
1 NON RETURNED KEY NON RETURNED KEY Pulled
Price
$2,400.00
$18.00
S0.00
$0.00
$360.00
$2.70
$180.00
$5.00
Mon� Fri 7:00-4:00 Cfouod Sat-Sun
PrtnlGd on Ttw611"'2023 11);1.2" .. <tPM Sortw11:re t,yPclnt-of-RcnlA! Sortwiant www,palM-or,rent&!,com Modlficatlon #7
CcnttflCl•Params.5CUJ)t {10)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 62

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
281 of 1244

.., Q M
0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 63

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
282 of 1244

■■ ■ ■-

RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
AGENCY: C,-n, or M� I�
PROJECT : \.tb.Lt kt---=� � CC.

JOB NO.: 2,.7P I Lf
COST CODE: 9o9) j on
Description of work performed and location :

LABOR:

DESCRIPTION
REMARKS:

A-wo t�,,,,.f.vl ,i ... <
SUBCONTRACTOR :
(IF NOT PRIME)

CLASSIFICATION
- fl:£:l. Tt""O .
t\
iv-, pw,.,
SIGNAT OW AGREES CONTRACTOR or SUBCONTRACTOR WORKED ON ITE, ic>F W°.3lK. -■
r
■
■ ■

PRESENTATIVE
"■• ■• ,I
r�!II-,.
■ r ■'j-
■ ■
l!I .!I
" .1■ u· lr ii ·
■ ■ ■ •
■
•
■
■

DAILY EXTRA WORK DIARY
•
■
.J
■
■ J
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 64

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
283 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
EXTRA WORK BILL-TITLE PAGE CCo-#S CASEWB 37.0
CEM-4902A (NEW 7/94) CT# 7541-3496-7 I Contract No . j CCONo. �2014. 909
j Report-No. -- Page
I 1 3
Date Performed
6/13/23
Date of Report
7/21/23
Con.Job-N
22014
1 ContRpt.No
:3?.Q
FA
+IX
Work Performed By
Riverside Construction Company, Inc.
03 Descriptlon of Work

REMOVE FIRE HYDRANT
For Resident Engineer's Use Only
Date Rec eived
□ Ne wBill D Approved for Payment
D Resubmittal D Returned for Correction
Date ol Action
Total Cost Summary, Standard Mark-Ups & Subcontractor Mark-Up E.W.

LS
of
A.C. "50o/, Sub A/W
UP FA LS UP BR Fla Work Oeta.v

I N N N
Attached to This Bill Are:
0 Labor Charges CEM-49028
0 Equipment Charges CEM-4902C
D Material Charges CEM-4902D
Partnering
Swtteh
N
----·--------·--------------------- -------,
[Total Equipment (A) 993.16] Total Other Expenses (F) o.ool Total Materials (B)
Subtotal Equipment & Materials (A) + (Bl
1 0 % Standard Mark-up
__J
Total Equipment.& Materials (A) + (BJ + Standard Mark-up !Total Regular Labor (Cl
I_
9 % Regular Labor Surcharge
Total Premium Labor (D)
I- 91 % Premium Labor Surcharge
Sub total Regular & Premi um (C+D)
Subtotal (C J+ (D) + Regular Surcharge+ Premium Surcharge Total Subsistence (EJ

0.001
993.16

99.32]
1,092.481
973.12

87.58]

0.001

0.00 973.121
1,oso:75\

0.001
Sub total (C) + (D) +Regular.Surcharge+ Premium Surcharge+ (E) + (F) � % Standard Markup
Total Labor (C ) + (D) +Surcharge+ (EJ + (F) + Markup
Total Equipment & Materials
Total Equipment·& Materials+ Labor
f' 10 % of Mark-up on Subcontract ed Work·(Only)
Grand Total
1,060.70]
318.211
1,378.91
1,092.48]
2,471.391
o.oo\ \
2,471.39'--
Slgnatiire-(R_e_skl_en-1 -�,)--- --
-
--- -- ----- -- --- u,�- ---�=-.. -��
T--·--- �-. --Tnc;;�f Q�estion:
-- - -------· '
I
(Resident Engineers Use Only)
-Signature (Primet5ontracta?s:ep-
__
--=_(l_(_�
S(l I Z.3_ ... - __ --=--=-�-=G
e
m���� ! 9:;:�L�.}�5�
FM 941992 M White • Data Entry Canary - Resident Engineer Pink • Contractor (Mer Approval) Gold enrod -Contractor � EWBills.com DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 65

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
284 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CASEWB 37.0

EXTRA WORK BILL - LABOR CHARGES
\ Contract No. CCONo. Report No. \ Labor su
9 harge I WCI Class I WCI Rate \ Pag
222014 909 OF 3
Name Regular Hours Premium Hours
Craft ID Im Last Hrs I Rate Total Hrs Rate
34 LBR C SORIANO II 4.0 67.840 271.36 88.780
35 OE JS LINSMEIER 8.0 87.720 701.76 116.175
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
Total(C) 973.12 Total (D)

OTHER EXPENSES SUBJECT TO LABOR MARKUP
I OesCflption
541
Signature (Resident Engine&r)
-
Signature (Prime Ccntractor's Representative)
(Ju� sf, /7.,..,_
Name
FM941991 M White - Data Entry canary - Resident Engineer Pink • Contractor (Alter Approval) Goldenrod • Contractor Subsl�nee
Total Units Rate Total
Total(E)
Amount
Travel Expense Extended Total (F)
Units Rate
In Case of Questton:
(Resident Engineer's Use Only)
I
Business Phone
EWBi/1s.com
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 66

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
285 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
EXTRA WORK BILL - EQUIJ>MENT CHARGES
Equip ID Number Cl= Make
04 4223 TRUCK T&TT
05 1156 LDRRT CAT
06 07
08 09
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
Signature of Resident Engineer
Signature of Prime Contracto�s Representative
�g .. - _...,... -
Equipment Description
Code
06-12
1869E
-- . Bl, I� -
CASEWB 37.0
Contract No.

I csoog' I Report No. Page
22014 3 OF 3
Regular Dvertlme Reg OT Extenoed
Attach Hours Hours Rate Rate Amount

4.00 42.39 169.56

8.00 102.95 823.60
In Case of Question Contact:
993.16 (Resident Engineer's Use Only) Total (A)
Name Business Phone
.... .. - .. - ...

DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 67

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
286 of 1244

RIVE:RSIDE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
AGEN cv : C n l,f o r M�, Ee::tr
_,, AOJECT : \{ell t,,-,..=-0 '\:k, A.P DG
JOB NO. : 't-1. 0 \ '-{
COST CODE: � cA I cwo
Description of work performed and location :

LABOR:

EMPLOYEE
NAME
EQUIPMENT:

EQUIP
NUMBER
l/'217

QUANTITY
AA&-' c ....,,... . '1N'I ,;:,-x:::: cu--" . ; Al,v
■ p ■ I, ■-I■
■ ,..
■
■
■ I,
,-­

I- CA I
■
■
SUBCONTRACTOR :
(IF NOT PRIME)

CLASSIFICATION
- ■■!I■ ..
1/vt- fl,.
■ ■ 'I
l /4,, I Elite- ( � 7
■ • ■
■ ■ ■
p
,.
'I
■
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 68

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
287 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA· DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

EXTRA WORK BILL-TITLE PAGE
CEM-4902A (NEW 7/94) CT#7541-3496-7
CL0=#- 5
Contract No.
220141
cc90�·-·-Report No.

E.W. I A.C.

CASEWB 38.0
Date Performed
6/16/23
Date of Report
7/21/23
eon. Job
1\1220141
Cont. Apt. No
3S
.O +• I FA I LS_l_Ul>j__EA � I UP I BR
+ I X
Pannerlng
Switch
N
Work Performed By
Riverside Construction Company, Inc.

Description of Work

REMOVE FIRE HYDRANT
For Resident Engineer's Use Only
□ NewBIII
D Resubmittal
1 1 otal Equipment (A)
rotal Materials (B)
D Approved for Payment
D Returned for Correction
Subtotal Equipment & Materials (Al + (Bl
-----:;-o1 % Standard Mark-up
Total Equipment & Materials (A)+ _(B) + Standard Mark-up r��gular Labor (C)
� % Regular Labor Surcharge
otal Premium Labor (0)
1 9 !
% Premium Labor Surcharge
I
Subtotal Regular & Premium (C+O)
Subtotal (C) + (0) + Regular Surcharge + Premium Surcharge rrotal Subsistence (E)
Date Received
Date of Action
Attached to This Bill Are:
0 Labor Charges CEM-4902B
0 Equipment Charges CEM-4902C
0 Material Charges CEM-4902D
Total Cost Summary, Standard Mark-Ups & Subcontractor Mark-Up 1,390.091

0.001
1,390.091
139.011
1,529.101
708.861

63.801

0.001 -

0.001 --
708.86
772.66
r 0.00
Total Other Expenses (F)
Subtotal (C) + (D) + Regular Surcharge + Premium Surcharge + (E) + (F) � % Standard Markup
L____J
Total Labor (C) + (D) + Surcharge + (E) + (F) + Markup
Total Equipment & Materials
Total Equipment & Materials + Labor
Q�J % of Mark-up on Subcontracted Work {Only)
Grand Total
---r-- - ----· . --- ·--· -- ----
In Case of Question:
(Resldenr E.n9/neer's Use Only)

0.00]
772.661
231 :so1
1,004.461
1,529.10]
2,533.56]

0.00]
2,533.561
Signature(Prime Contract,r's
White • Data Entry
8 fi
· �ame --- I Business Phone ___ 'b
� ----�_,lz..3_ _ ____ l�rY'1ftk��� _tt�=u2_-l.__��- - Pink • Contractor (Airer Approval) Goldenrod • Contractor EWBills.com FM941992M DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 69

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
288 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA· DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

EXTRA WORK BILL - LABOR CHARGES
Cralt ID Int
Name
L2st
34 OE DC KIMBERUNG
35 TMS M HARDY
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53

OTHER EXPENSES SUBJECT TO LABOR MARKUP
I Description
54 I
Signature (Resident Engineer)
Signature (Prime Conrractol's Representative)
fJuW
illary g
I Contract No.
22014
Regular Hours
Hrs Rate

4.0 87.490

5.0 71.780
Total (C)
Bf J/,z.3
CASEWB 38.0
CCONo. Report No. I Labor su
9 ai:ge I WCI Class \ WCI Rate \ Pag
2 909 OF 3
Premlum Kours. Subsistence
Total Hrs Rate Total Units Rate Total
349.96 115.830
358.90 91.400
708.86 Total (D) Tolal (E)
Amount
Travel Expense Extended Total (F)
Units Rate
I I
In Case ol Quesijon:
(Resident E:ngineet's Use Only}
Name I Business Phone
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 70

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
289 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

EXTRA WORK BILL - EQUIPMENT CHARGES
Equip ID Number Class Make
04 2045 TRUCK T&TT
05 6033 TRUCK T&TT
06 1146 LDRRT CAT
07 08
09 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 1B
19 20
21 22
23 Signature of Resident Engineer
Contract No. CCONo.
22014 909
EqulpmentDesalption Regular Overtime Reg
Code Attach Hours Hours Rate
60 5.00 105.34
12-20 5.00 54.71
2310 4.00 147.46
In Case of Question Contact:
(Residenr cngineer's Use Only)
Signature· of Prime Contractor's Representative·
(�) '8 { I /'7.,,j
Name
FM9419B7M White - Data Entry Canary - Resident Engineer Pink - Contractor (After Approval) Goldenrod - Contractor CASEWB 38.0
Report No. [ Pag
3 OF 3
OT Extended
Rate Amount
526.70
273.55
589.84
Total (A) 1,390.09
Business Phone
EWB/1/s.com
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 71

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
290 of 1244

■

RIVERS(DE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
f n '1 0 r:: N\A..J \ f:-ff
ROJECT: \±bLL � � 6G
JOB NO. : 1,,1.-o \\.I (IF NOT PRIME)

SUBCONTRACTOR
COST CODE: 9o'1 (qo?:>
Description of work performed and location : _1/-1,,\,�,£fl)l'.:_!_�O'.!.lL<I f:"t'.._-'--�"__lf_._(2.,{'::::.i:. _ _.l�___.:__:.Lfl?j--=�!.2....'.-=---�=--=-----=-===-----=====-=== LABOR:

EMPLOYEE
NAME
EQUIPMENT:

EQUIP DESCRIPTION
·NUMBER
,::1.,,.,,..., G,.d. 4<>-t ;;,, -s::: 7

OSIGNATURE BEL
'I
■ r �
e■

CLASSIFICATION HOURS
Regular Overtime
5 HOURS
,. ■
■
DocuSign Envelope ID: 0DB8D525-D878-45F6-96DF-D35DB84C9830 DocuSign Envelope ID: E4519B4F-D699-47A3-8D43-CE8B98CFA2A5 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 72

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
291 of 1244

Page 1 of 2 ends

DATE: 9/19/2023
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

PROJECT NO: CIP 13-03 PURCHASE ORDER NO: 04396
CONTRACTOR:

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES AND/OR EXTRA WORK:

The Contractor is hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications and/or perform the following described work not included in the Plans and Specifications for this project.

ITEM

DESCRIPT

ION U/M QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 FA 1 $3,412.35 $3,412.35
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER: $3,412.35
JUSTIFICATION: (Be specific on each item. Attach supporting documents as necessary)

1. A
n existing Southern California Edison (SCE) concrete encased duct bank was in conflict with the CIDH piles and footing for bridge abutment #4.

T
he existing duct bank is shown in a different location on the plans. SCE relocated the duct bank to avoid the conflict. However, the Contractor had to remove existing concrete duct bank.

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 06

CITY OF MENIFEE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Holland Road Overcrossing at Interstate 215
The additional work will be compensated at force account Riverside Construction Company
Remove Southern California Edison's (SCE) concrete encasement at Antelope Road/Holland Road (Abutment #4)
This document shall become an amendment to the Contract and all provisions of the Contract will apply hereto. This Change Order constitutes a complete and final resolution of all claims of the Contract for additional time or additional compensation related to or affected by work that is the subject of this Change Order. Quantities of items other than Lump Sum are not to exceed the amounts indicated.

C:\Users\phann\Downloads\CCO 06
DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 73

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
292 of 1244

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 06

CITY OF MENIFEE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

Page 2 of 2 ends

CONT

RACT VARIANCE SUMMARY
CCO # Amount %
01 $20,537.39 0.08%
02 $49,000.00 0.19%
03 ($9,000.00) -0.03%
04 $0.00 0.00%
05 $16,824.94 0.07%
06 $3,412.35 0.01%
Totals $80,774.68 0.31%
$25,848,403.85 January 10, 2023
$77,362.33 March 28, 2024
$3,412.35 0
$25,929,178.53 March 28, 2024
AUTHORIZATION BY CITY:

Recommended for approval by:

Date: __________ Date: __________
Approved by:

Date: __________ Date: ___________
ACCEPTANCE BY CONTRACTOR:

We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the above described changes and/or extra work and hereby agree that said work is a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto.

Accepted by: _____________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Signature
_____________________________________________________
Please print name and title
Previous Change Order Amounts:

Current Change Order Amount:

Revised Contract Amount:

City Manager
Nicolas Fidler
Amr Abuelhassan, Southstar Construction Manager Carlos E. Geronimo, City Project Manager Armando G. Villa
0 0
7/27/2023 Increased Girder Flare Thickness
Exc. Abut. #4/Fire Hydrant extra work
Remove SCE's concrete encasement
0 0
12" C900 DR 14 Fusible Pipe
Director of Public Works/Engineering
________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ Original Contract Amount:
0 0
Additional Time
5/15/2023
5/31/2023Irrigation Modifications Plan IP-5
9/5/2023
Extra Work for miscellaneous items
Revised Completion Date:
0 Date Started:

Original Completion Date:

Additional Time (Working Days)
Description Date Approved
4/17/2023
C:\Users\phann\Downloads\CCO 06
DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 Ryan Camp
9/19/2023
Projects Manager
DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 9/19/2023
9/19/2023
9/20/2023
9/21/2023
Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 74

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
293 of 1244

Holland Rd Overcrossing at I-215 Project
CCO #06
Report #41 2,271.69$
Report #42 1,140.66$
Total 3,412.35$
DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 75

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
294 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

EXTRA WORK BILL-TITLE PAGE
CEM-4902A (NEW 7/94) CT# 7541-3496-7
Date Performed Date of Report Con. Job No. Cont. Apt. No. 7/24/23 8/22/23 22014 41.0
Work Performed By
Riverside Construction Company, Inc.

Description of Work

REMOVE SCE ENCASEMENT AT ANTELOPE/HOLLAND
For Resident Engineer's Use Only
Date Received
□ NewBlll 0 Approved for Payment
0 Resubmittal 0 Returned for Correction
Date of Action
Contract No.

CASEWB
CCONo. Page
22014 915
Report No.

E.W. A.C.
+ • FA LS UP FA LS UP BR
+ X
Attached to This Bill Are:
[8J Labor Charges CEM-49028
0 Equipment Charges CEM-4902C
0 Material Charges CEM-4902D

41.0 Partnering
Switch
N
Total Cost Summary, Standard Mark-Ups & Subcontractor Mark-Up otal Equipment (A)
otai Materials (8)
Subtotal Equipment & Materials (A) + (8)
� % Standard Mark-up
Total Equipment & Materials (Al + (8) + Standard Mark-up otal Regular Labor (C)
otal Premium Labor (D)
□ % Premium Labor Surcharge
Subtotal Regular & Premium (C+D)
Subtotal (C) + (D) + Regular Surcharge+ Premium Surcharge otal Subsistence (E)
gnature (Resident Engineer)
Signature (Prime Contractor's Representative)
933.021

0.001
933.021

93.301
1,026.321
878.881

79.101

0.001
878.881
957.981

0.001
FM 941992M White - Data Entry Canary - Resident Engineer Pink - Contractor (Aller Approval) Total Other Expenses (F)
Subtotal (C) + (D) + Regular Surcharge + Premium Surcharge + (E) + (Fl � % Standard Markup
Total Labor (Cl + (D) + Surcharge+ (E) + (F) + Markup
Total Equipment & Materials
Total Equipment & Materials+ Labor
� % of Mark-up on Subcontracted Work (Only)
GrandTotat
In Case of Question:

0.001
957.981
287.391
1,245.371
1,026.321
2,271.691

0.001
2,271.691
CCO 06
DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 76

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
295 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA• DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CASEWB 41.0

EXTRA WORK BILL - LABOR CHARGES
CEM-4902B (NEW 7/94) CT# 7541-3497-9 I Contract No.

I
CCO No.
l
Report No.

I
Labor su
9 harge I WCI Class I WCI Rate
I Pag
2 22014 915 OF 3
Name Regular Hours Premium Hours Subsistence
Craft ID Int Last Hrs Rate Total Hrs Rate Total Units Rate Total 34 OE M STEPHENSON 8.0 91.600 732.80 120.995
35 LBR DG GUTIERREZ 2.0 73.040 146.08 96.055
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
Total(C) 878.88 Total(D) Total (E)

OTHER EXPENSES SUBJECT TO LABOR MARKUP
Description Amount
54 Travel Expense Extended Total (F)
Units Rate
Signature /Resident Engineer} In Case of Question:
(Resident Engineer's Use Only)
Signature /Prime Contractor's Representative)
n.,� 8/2-'i/?"?
Name
I
Business Phone
FM 941991 M White • Data Entry Canary - Resident Engineer Pink -Contractor(AtterApproval) Goldenrod - Contractor EWBfffs.com DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 77

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
296 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA· DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

EXTRA WORK BILL - EQUIPMENT CHARGES
DC-CEM-4902C (NEW 7/94) CT# 7541-3498·1
Equip ID Number Class Make
04 1167 LDRRT CAT
05 4179 TRUCK T&TT
06 07
08 09
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
Signature of Resident Engineer
Contract No.
22014
Equipment Desc_rlptlon Regular Overtime
Code Attach Hours Hours
1869E 8.00
12-20 2.00
In Case ol Question Contact:
(Resldant Engineer's Use Only)
Signature of Prime Contractor's Representative
{!�.-1-- 8/7-41-z,-:;
Name
FM 941987 M ,-White - Data Entry Ca'lfary - Reslaent EngTn�er Pink - Contractor (Atter Approval) Goldenrod - Contractor CASEWB 41.0
CCO No. Report No. I Pag
3915 OF 3
Reg OT Extended
Rate Rate Amount
102.95 823.60

54.71 109.42
Total(A) 933.02
Business Phone
EWB/1/s.com
DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 78

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
297 of 1244

IVERSIDE

CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, INC. DAILY EXTRA WORK DIARY
AGENCY: _,._c_\ -'--11L....>...;1 ,L___.!.1\-'-':C,__________._----'--'---'-"'"--'-':...:.....:.-=---- PROJEC��l-�f�A�l�l �r-�--���--­
--,
DATE WORK PERFORMED: ___ l_z_v_/_7_3 ______ _
JOB NO.: 22 0\\(
SUBCONTRACTOR: ______________ _ ,
(IF NOT PRIME)
Description of work performed and location: �����-��---''-'-'_G_/\_�_1 �'�"-"'-'�"N __ T __ tl_T ________ _ J\�Tu Ge� l /1 Lu.,>,.,•�-
LABOR:

EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION HOURS
NAME ·- � Regular Overtime
It,
s'..
e'>
?n p , , i, /,J �6 1-.J, Q p:,,,7�\ Tl),7L tJ
/15. &1( I rJ i...�;5 l -z'.:.. &.A-73 o tL p:--y.i;,7 - -- -
-
=----� - - -
-
EQUIPMENT: --

EQUIP DESCRIPTION HOURS
NUMBER
-::::, ---
2 - �-- -
--
- -
-- -
MATERIALS :

QUANTITY U/M - DESCRIPTION
- -
- -....::-- -= --
- � - �--- - ---
REMARKS:
0,__;l
SIGN LOW AGREES CONTRACTOR or SUBCONTRACTOR WORKED ON ITEfi' OP-�RK. ,:,

CONTRACTOR'S REPRESENTATIVE
■ ',.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 79

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
298 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA· DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

EXTRA WORK BILL-TITLE PAGE
CEM-4902A (NEW 7/94) CT# 7541-3496•7
01 Date Performed
8/07/23
Date of Report
8/22/23
Con. Job No.
22014
02 Work Performed By
Riverside
Construction Company, Inc.

Contract No.

Cont. Rpt. No.

42.0 CCO No.
22014 915
Report No.

E.W. A.C.
+ • FA LS UP FA LS UP BR
+ X
CASEWB
Page

42.0 Partnering
Switch
N
03 Description of Work

HAUL OFF SCE ENCASEMENT CONCRETE FROM AREA AT ANTELOPE/HOLLAND □ NewBIII
D Resubmlnal
otal Equipment (A)
otal Materials (B)
For Resident Engineer's Use Only
D Approved for Payment
D Returned for Correction
Subtotal Equipment & Materials (A) + (B)
� % Standard Mark-up
Total Equipment & Materials (A) + (B) + Standard Mark-up otal Regular Labor (CJ
otal Premium Labor (D)
□ % Premium Labor Surcharge
Subtotal Regular & Premium (C+D)
Subtotal (C) + (D) + Regular Surcharge+ Premium Surcharge otal Subsistence (E)
Signature /Resident Engineer)
Signature (Prime Contractor's Representative)
FM 94
1992 M White - Data Entry
Date Received
Date of Action
Attached to This Bill Are:
0 Labor Charges CEM-4902B
0 Equipment Charges CEM-4902C
D Material Charges CEM-4902D
Total Cost Summary, Standard Mark-Ups & Subcontractor Mark-Up 517.271

0.001
517.271

51.731
569.001
403.431

36.311

0.001

0.001
403.431
439.741

0.001
Pink - Contractor /Alter Approvslj
Total Other Expenses (F)
Subtotal (C) + (DJ + Regular Surcharge + Premium Surcharge + (E) + (F) � % Standard Markup
Total Labor (C) + (D) +Surcharge+ (E) + (F) + Markup
Total Equipment & Materials
Total Equipment & Materials+ Labor
� % of Mark-up on Subcontracted Work (Only)
Grand Total
In Case of Question:
(Resident Engineer's Use Only)

0.001
439.741
131.921
571.661
569.001
1,140.661

0.001
1,140.661
CCO 06
DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 80

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
299 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA· DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
EXTRA WORK BILL • LABOR CHARGES
CEM-49028 (NEW 7/94) CT# 7541-3497-9 I Contract No.
22014 I CCO No. I Report No.
915 I
Name Regular Hours Premium Hours
Craft ID Int Last Hrs Rate Total Hrs Rate
34 OE A ·PERCIVAL 2.0 91.600 183.20 120.995
35 TMS B HERNANDEZ 3.0 73.410 220.23 93.270
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
Total(C) 403.43 Total (D)

OTHER EXPENSES SUBJECT TO LABOR MARKUP
Description
54 Signature (Resident Engineer)
-
Signature (Prime Contractor's Representative)
n,,<;;;, 8�lf /z3
Name
FM 941991 M While - Data Entry Canary - Resident Engineer Pink - Contractor (Aller Approval) Goldenrod - Contractor CASEWB 42.0
Labor Su
�r
arge
I
WCI Class
I
WCI Rate
1P
ag
2 OF 3
Subsistence
Total Unlls Raia Total
Total(E)
Amount
Travel Expense Extended Total (F)
Unlls Rate
In Case of Question:
(Resident Engineer's Use Only)
I
Business Phone
EWB/1/s.com
DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 81

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
300 of 1244

STATE OF CALIFORNIA· DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

EXTRA WORK BILL - EQUIPMENT CHARGES
DC-CEM•4902C (NEW 7/94) CT#7541-3498-1
Equip ID Number Class Make
04 1167 LDRRT CAT
OS 2041 TRUON TRUN
06 07
08 09
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
Signature of Resident Engineer
Contract No. CCO No.
22014 915
Equipment Description Regular overtime Reg
Code Attach Hours Hours Rate
1869E 2.00 102.95
4AXL 3.00 103.79
In Case of Question Contact:
(Resident £nglneer·s Use Only)
Signature of Prime Contractor's Representative
� S/-z.'f h.. 3
Name
FM 941987 M White - Data Entry Can1!ry - Resident Engineer Pink - Contractor (ANer Approval) Goldenrod - Contractor CASEWB 42.0
Report No. I Pag
3 OF 3
OT Ex1ended
Rate Amount
205.90
311.37
Total(A) 517.27
Business Phone
EWBi/1s.com
DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 82

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
301 of 1244

IVERSIDE

CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY, INC.

AGENCY: C , n/ ,.... r k. I k ,._ > , r l 7--
PROJECT: kl ( \ \ \ /,.. () � l \ a\. oc.

JOB N0.:_�2�7�c�\�\_t _________ _
COST CODE: �_l_-_9_o_o _______ _

DAILY EXT RA WORK DIARY
DATE WORK PERFORMED: __ o-'-/�1�/�z�3-----==-----­
SUBCONTRACTOR:______,=------=-------------­
(IF NOT PRIME)
Description of work performed and location: -�' �/1�1�t �' '=��n�r_-r-����c.�t-�&=-��.,__,,-1-'---=s;--'-(-_1_1_1-'-t _?\.._l_1 __ l<_o=-.c._10_c-'-rz_---=-l'_,_,,"--- i7 rry,\ /\ ,- AW 1"'r(CWF I/ h)t k A 10-0 �"::> ,
LABOR:

EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION HOURS
NAME - Regular Overtime
A. �17[ I l ) 1\.,1 f)j;)n i-t\ mi?:.. 2..

I� /.t,"'"'7 k )0. ->--J \", p 2__ '1J [) ,::;-r:i....A 'T7I ,� - 3 - - --- -
-- - - -
-
EQUIPMENT: - e:::-
EQUIP � � --- DESCRIPTION

NUMBER -
l I lc, 1 L-/5G Tu,,,- K= HOC
�{�ll( f <uri:>n-:> ta
--�
-
MATERIALS:

QUANTITY U/M
-
1: - -
-
REMARKS:

Ac.. \1-,(ot?c
� "t...J,,-,, {- ,41,-, t /".¥"'£;(.C..a·;...
=:::a - -
- - -
-
=---= �
..

P,,2.fi7"! T).-r v1 en ,i)-s;-
A,::_✓,,..., pf':i. �Lt i:::i l- I/YI I
- -- --
- - - iL -
----
-

DESCRIPTION
� -
--
DI 1?.il n_r()
t.:��c.. ... _,. Mr )
..
,_ �
J!t,,
-�-
--
--
-
,b/2.t ,,-.
u HOURS
2-
3 -
-
-
"'"' /,,,rt.---/�.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 52507910-A5E6-43EA-91D8-F82660C34C45 DocuSign Envelope ID: 05E7861C-A2D8-48AC-8F9B-F73C91979F48 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 83

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
302 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 84

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
303 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700

CITY OF MENIFEE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 07

Page 2 of 2 ends

CONTRACT VARIANCE SUMMARY
CCO# Description Amount % Additional Time Date Approved 01 12" C900 DR 14 Fusible Pipe $20,537.39 0.08% 0 4/17/2023 5/15/202302 Extra Work for miscellaneous items $49,000.00 0.19% 0 5/31/2023
7/27/2023
9/5/2023
03 04
Irrigation Modifications Plan IP-5
Increased Girder Flare Thickness
($9,000.00)
$0.00
-0.03%

0.00%
0 0
05 06
07 Misc. Extra Work T&M $16,824.94
$3,412.35

0.07%

0.01%

0.07%
0 0Misc. Extra Work T&M (EMWD)
DB Electric Extra Work for Frontier
9/21/2023
$17,892.61 0
0Totals $98,667.29 0.38%
Original Contract Amount: $25,848,403.85
$80,774.68
Date Started: January 10, 2023
Previous Change Order Amounts:

Current Change Order Amount:

Original Completion Date: March 28, 2024
0$17,892.61 Additional Time (Working Days)
Revised Contract Amount: $25,947,071.14 Revised Completion Date: March 28, 2024 AUTHORIZATION BY CITY:

Recommended for approval by:
12/11/2023
Approved by:

Date:12/13/2023 12/13/2023
Director of Public Works/Engineering
ACCEPTANCE BY CONTRACTOR:

Acting City Manager
We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the above described changes and/or extra work and hereby agree that said work is a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto.

Date:12/11/2023 _Accepted by:

Ryan Camp - Projects Manager
Please print name and title
Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 85

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
304 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 86

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
305 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 87

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
306 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 88

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
307 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 89

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
308 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 90

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
309 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 91

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
310 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 92

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
311 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 93

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
312 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 94

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
313 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 95

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
314 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 96

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
315 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 97

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
316 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 98

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
317 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 99

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
318 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 100

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
319 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: 785787FA-A772-4DAD-B5D2-84E3F705C700 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 101

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
320 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6

CITY OF MENIFEE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 08

Page 1 of 2 ends

DATE: 1/18/2024
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Holland Road Overcrossing at Interstate 215 PROJECT NO:

CONTRACTOR:

CIP 13-03 PURCHASE ORDER NO: 04396
Riverside Construction Company
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES AND/OR EXTRA WORK:

The Contractor is hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications and/or perform the following described work not included in the Plans and Specifications for this project.

ITEM DESCRIPTION U/M QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
Extra Work at Agreed Price
Perform exothermic welding of copper cable to bridge reinforcing steel per attached SCE plan - Structure Bond Connection detail,1
2 $2,577.22
Modify the bridge utility openings and provide additional reinforcing streel $6,767.74 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER: $9,344.96
This document shall become an amendment to the Contract and all provisions of the Contract will apply hereto. This Change Order constitutes a complete and final resolution of all claims of the Contract for additional time or additional compensation related to or affected by work that is the subject of this Change Order. Quantities of items other than Lump Sum are not to exceed the amounts indicated.

JUSTIFICATION: (Be specific on each item. Attach supporting documents as necessary)

1. Caltrans requires the Contractor to perform exothermic welding of copper cable to bridge rebar as shown on the attached Southern California Edison's plan - Structure Bond Connection detail for new bridges. This work was not part of the Contract. The Contracor will perform this work as extra work at an agreed price of $2,577.22.

2. The waterline utility openings in the bridge need to be shifted down to accommodate the post tensioning ducts and the #11 rebar in the bent caps. The stirrups in Detail U-7 of Std. Plan B7-10 will need to be fabricated longer in ten locations (abutments and bent caps for the two waterlines; the bent caps for the electrical line) than shown in the contract plans. The Contracor will perform this work as extra work at an agreed price of $6,767.74.

C:\Users\phann\Desktop\CCO 08R
Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 102

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
321 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6

CITY OF MENIFEE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 08

Page 2 of 2 ends

CONTRACT VARIANCE SUMMARY
CCO # Description Amount % Additional Time Date Approved 4/17/2023
5/15/2023
5/31/2023
7/27/2023
9/5/2023
01 02
03 04
05 06
07 12" C900 DR 14 Fusible Pipe
Extra Work for miscellaneous items
Irrigation Modifications Plan IP-5
Increased Girder Flare Thickness
Misc. Extra Work T&M
$20,537.39
$49,000.00
($9,000.00)
$0.00

0.08%

0.19%
-0.03%

0.00%

0.07%

0.01%

0.07%
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 $16,824.94
$3,412.35
$17,892.61
9/21/2023
12/13/2023
Misc. Extra Work T&M (EMWD)
DB Electric Extra Work for Frontier
Modify bridge utility opening and
provide additinal rebar; perform
exothermic welding at the bridge08 $9,344.96 0.04%

0.42%
0 0Totals $108,012.25
Original Contract Amount: $25,848,403.85
$98,667.29
$9,344.96
Date Started: January 10, 2023
Previous Change Order Amounts:

Current Change Order Amount:

Original Completion Date: March 28, 2024
0Additional Time (Working Days)
Revised Contract Amount: $25,956,416.10 Revised Completion Date: March 28, 2024 AUTHORIZATION BY CITY:

Recommended for approval by:
1/26/2024
1/26/2024
Approved by:
1/26/2024
Date: __________
____________________
_________Director of Public Works/Engineering City Manager Acting City Manager
ACCEPTANCE BY CONTRACTOR:

We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the above described changes and/or extra work and hereby agree that said work is a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. 1/22/2024
Date: ____________________________Accepted by: __________________________________ Ryan Camp - Project Manager_____________________________________________________ Please print name and title
C:\Users\phann\Desktop\CCO 08R
Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 103

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
322 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 RIVERSIDE CONST.

P.O. BOX 1146

ESTIMATE WORKSHEET
RIVERSIDE, CA. 92502
PROJECT NAME: Holland Road OC DATE: 01/16/24
DESCRIPTION: Request for CCO - Bridge items
ITEM OF WORK: Place exothermic - CAD weld as directed per RFI 42 CREW:

DB Electric
Lump Sum price
TRADE
Crew
#
#
RATE
RATE
COMB RATE TOT Qty
1 TOTAL
$2,342.932,342.93 1
Markup 10%
Total =
Qty
$234.29
$2,577.22
TOTALCREW: TRADE COMB RATE TOT
Intergrity Rebar Crew
Lump Sum price
4,646.26 1 1 $4,646.26
Markup 10%
Total =
$464.63
$5,110.89
ITEM OF WORK: Modify Waterline Utility openings
CREW: TRADE
Carp
Carp
#
1 1
RATE
101.36

88.22 COMB RATE TOT
101.36
HRS/DAY Q = DAYS TOTAL
FM 3 1
1 $304.08
$970.4288.22 11
Sub total
Markup 30%
TOT=
$1,274.50
$382.35
$1,656.85
Grand total $9,344.96
Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 104

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
323 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 105

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
324 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 106

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
325 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 107

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
326 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 108

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
327 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 109

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
328 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 110

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
329 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 111

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
330 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 112

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
331 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 113

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
332 of 1244

DocuSign Envelope ID: BA54118C-579D-4970-93E9-FA755A68A1E6 1982081
741438
TD 1050976
Item Title: 10.10
Contract Change Order with Riverside Construction Company, Inc. for the Holland Road/I-215 Overcrossing Item Page Number: 114

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
333 of 1244

CITY OF MENIFEE
SUBJECT: Contract Change Order and Notice of Completion and Acceptance for the Casa Blanca and Willows/Lake Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
MEETING DATE: April 17, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Carlos Geronimo, Engineering Manager
REVIEWED BY: Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY: Armando G. Villa, City Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute Contract Change Order No. 1 with COPP Construction, Inc. for construction services related to Casa Blanca Community Resurfacing Project and the Willows/Lake Ridge Community Resurfacing Project, in the amount of $40,418.95, increasing the contract value to a total amount not-to-exceed $2,299,550.30; and

2. Accept the improvements for the Casa Blanca Community Resurfacing Project and Willows/Lake Ridge Community Resurfacing Project; and

3. Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion with the Riverside County Recorder’s Office.

DISCUSSION
The Casa Blanca Community Resurfacing Project, Capital Improvement Program (“CIP”) Project No. 23-05, and Willows/Lake Ridge Community Resurfacing Project, CIP Project No. 23-06 (“Projects”) consisted of resurfacing existing pavement by grinding and overlaying asphalt concrete, replacement of 49 existing non-compliant curb ramps, drainage improvements, and removal and replacement of roadway striping and signage. The combined length of the resurfacing efforts for the Projects was approximately 2.9 linear miles.

On August 16, 2023, the City Council approved a construction budget of $2,390,678, and authorized the City Manager to award the construction services contract to COPP Construction, Inc. (“Contractor”) in the amount of $2,243,503. Construction work began in September 2023.

Although staff make every effort to carefully study and anticipate the extent of the scope of work required to achieve projects goals, unforeseen needs are often encountered as a project Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 1

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
334 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
CIP 23-05/06 CCO & NOC
April 17, 2024

Page 2 of 3 ends

2 1
1 7
progresses, resulting in additional work outside of the original scope. It is standard in resurfacing projects to prepare a “clean-up” or “true-up” Contract Change Order (“CCO”) that captures material overages or deductions that have occurred throughout the construction of a project.

Material overages are not additional construction items, but additional material necessary to complete the project as intended in the construction documents. Material overages are validated by City inspectors and the project manager to ensure compliance with the project plans and specifications. Material deductions are bid items that are “credited back” to the City that resulted in the use of less material quantities than was indicated in the project documents. Material deductions are also validated by City inspectors and the project manager to ensure compliance with the Projects plans and specifications.

During construction, two contract change orders were required. CCO No. 1 serves as a “clean- up” change order and includes an increase of $112,800.77 in material overages and a decrease of $72,381.82 in material deductions, bringing the net total to $40,418.95, or 1.8% of the Projects total cost. Similarly, CCO No. 2, in the amount of $15,628.50, provides for an increase of $34,540.50 in material overages and a decrease of $18,912 in material deductions bringing the net total to $15,628.50. The additional activities required under each change order are summarized in Table 1 below. The final overall construction cost for the Projects totaled $2,299,550.30, including ancillary costs for materials testing and labor compliance services.

TABLE 1 - CONTRACT ACTIVITY SUMMARY
Activity Approval Date Description of Services Amount
Original Contract October 19, 2022 Construction services $2,243,502.85 CCO No. 1 Pending Additional curb & gutter, ADA
ramps, sidewalk, and stop bar
replacement exceeding original
quantities, reduction in concrete
spandrel quantities and removal
of mortar work.
$40,418.95
CCO No. 2 February 26, 2024 Additional concrete for retaining curbs exceeding original
quantities, reduction in required
utility relocation work.
$15,628.50
TOTAL $2,299,550.30
Pursuant to Menifee Municipal Code §3.12.090, any change orders in the amount greater than 10% of the contract amount or that exceeds the City Manager’s signing authority require ratification / approval by the City Council. CCO No. 1 is below the 10% threshold amount but exceeds the City Manager’s signing authority. CCO No. 2, in the amount of $15,628.50, is within the City Manager’s authority and was approved in February 2024.

The Projects also required coordination with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) for adjustment of utility items throughout the Project areas. On August 16, 2023, the City and EMWD entered into a Utility Relocation Agreement stating that EMWD is to reimburse the City a total of $104,160 for the work performed to adjust utilities. During construction, there was a reduction in the utility relocation work required by the Contractor, and it has been determined that the total Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 2

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
335 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
CIP 23-05/06 CCO & NOC
April 17, 2024

Page 3 of 3 ends

2 1
1 7
reimbursement due from EMWD would be $102,560. Staff has submitted a request for reimbursement from EMWD in the amount of $102,560.

Once approved, a Notice of Completion (NOC) would be filed, which protects the City from future claims against the Projects by providing proper noticing to each contractor, subcontractor, and material supplier, that the Projects have been completed. The payment bond would be released upon acceptance by the City and the performance bond would be released one year after the date of recording of the NOC. The City has not received any stop notices that would prevent said releases.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE
Safe and Attractive Community

FISCAL IMPACT
The total of all the CCO’s for the Projects is $56,047.45 or 2.5% of the total contract amount, well below the 10% threshold established in Menifee Municipal Code. The fiscal impact of the proposed CCO No. 1 requiring approval by the City Council is $40,418.95. The funding required to support the proposed amendment is available in the adopted project budget, as summarized in Table 2 below.

TABLE 2 - EXISTING PROJECT FUNDING
Fund Project Account No. Budget CCO No. 1 Cost
General
Fund
Casa Blanca
Community Resurfacing 100-4555-58152 $53,749.38 $20,018.73 General
Fund
Willows/Lake Ridge
Community Resurfacing 100-4555-58153 $53,749.37 $20,018.72 Measure A Casa Blanca
Community Resurfacing 220-4555-58152 $190.75 $190.75
Measure A Willows/Lake Ridge
Community Resurfacing 220-4555-58153 $190.75 $190.75
TOTALS $107,880.25 $40,418.95
There is no fiscal impact associated with the acceptance of the improvements related to the Projects and filing the Notice of Completion. All costs to complete the Projects were supported within previously approved Capital Improvement Program.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Project Location Map

2. Contract Change Order No. 1

3. Contract Change Order No. 2

4. Notice of Completion

5. Close-Out Documents
Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 3

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
336 of 1244

WINCHESTER(UNINCORPORATED)

CANYON LAKE

TUPELO RD

STERN DR

BARNETT RD

CHEVY CHASE RDPEBBLEBEACH DR

GROSSE POINT DR

BETH DR

BYERS ST

VERONICA AV

PLEASANT VALLEY AVSADDLEBACK LN

NEW HUB DRAVENIDA DE CORTEZ

RIO VISTA DRBALDY PEAK DR

PARK AV

CITY AVBEREA RDMORNING BREEZE DRDORVAL CTCAMINO DELORES

WINTERHAWK RDKILLINGTON DRRIMCREEKPATH

CARMEL RD

FARMINGTON RDBYERS ST

VISTA WYCASA BONITA AV

CONEJO DRLAS FLORES DRJUANITA DRCONEJO DRBEVERLY DRCHEYENE CANYON VERMILLON LNESCALANTE RD

LA BERTHA LN

SAN JACINTO RD

MOUNTAIN VIEW PLCONNECTICUT DRHAMPSHIRE DRAVENIDA ESTRELLA

CANYON DRCANYON DR

SPRINGBOX WY

CLARK PLPALM DR

WAVERLY DREL RANCHO DRTHORNHILL DRPHOENIX WYPORTSMOUTH DRWORCHESTER RD WWORCHESTER RD E

PIPING ROCK RD

BRANDYWINE DR

THORTON AVTURFWOOD ST

GEARY ST

BYERS STWHEAT STAARON ALAN DRHILL ST

MEHAFFEY STBLUEBELL STCOMWELL ST

TROY LNNOVA LNSTAR DRMANTLE DRCALLE ELIMANO

PRESLEY ST

HILLCREST DRPARK

PALM DRNEVADA DR

CANYONHEIGHTSRDNEWPORT DR

BADGER CREEK LNCHERRYL DRCOOPERVIEW DRNARANJA DRPLATINO DR

HECHT RDCROSSHILL DRVISTA WYSCHIRMER DR

ASHDALE WYLA PINA DRTRENT DRDATIL DRMANZANA DRLA CRESTA DR

BIGGS LN

OREGON PL

DAKOTA DR

TEXAS LN

MONTANAN STCIRCLE DRCIRCLE DRKABIAN PKRANCHO DR

MOUNT VERNON PL

LODGE DR

LUCAS DRCOTTONTAIL DRWILLIAMS DRAVENIDA GAVIOTAPASEO DE LA PLAZA

PASEO ARROYOAVENIDA GAVIOTAAVENIDA DE LAS FLORES

PASEO VIVORA

WILD VIEW RDSTAGE COACH RDDERBY HILL

MOUNTAIN PARK DR

BYERS ST

HAWTHORNE STGEARY STMELVIN ST

MELVIN STNODTHFIELD LNROLLING HILLS DR

BARNES LNALDER STMELIDO STGEARY STDEBON ST
ILLINOIS AVE.WATSON RD.CASE RD.

CITY OFMENIFEECA

MAPES RD

SHERMAN RDWATSON RDANTELOPE RD

MENIFEE RD
(HWY 74)ETHANAC RDETHANAC RD

MCLAUGHLIN RDMCLAUGHLIN RDROUSE RDROUSE RD

MATTHEWS RD

MATTHEWS RD

MCCALL MCCALL BLVD

NEWPORT RDNEWPORT RD

HOLLAND RDHOLLAND RD

GARBANI RDGARBANI RD

BRIGGS RD

BRIGGS RD

BRIGGS RD

CHAMBERS AVE

RIDGEMOOR RDPOTOMAC DR

MURRIETA RD

MURRIETA RD

MURRIETA RD

BRADLEY RDMENIFEE RDCHERRYBLVDHILLSSUN

BLVDCITY SIMPSON RD

DOMENIGONI PKWY

MENIFEE RD

ANTELOPE RD

ENCANTO DRCHAMBERS AVE

RDLA PIEDRALA PIEDRARD

CRAIG AVEBRADLEY RD

SHERMAN RDHAUN RD

CORSON AVEEVANS RD
RD

PALOMAR RD

SHERMAN RDTRUMBLE RD

MAPES RD

WATSON RD

WICKERD RD

LAGUNA VISTA DR

LINDENBERGER

ANTELOPE RD

CRAIG AVE

ALICANTE DR

NORMANDY RD
215 FREEWAY
215 FREEWAYTALLY RD

ANTELOPE RD

GOETZ RD

GOETZ RD

GOETZ RD

GOETZ RD
MALAGA RD(HWY 74)

LA LADERA RDLINDERBERGER RD

VALEY BLVD

PALOMAR RD

EVANS RD

LAZY CREEK RD

HOLLAND RD

EVANS RD

BRADLEY RD
(HWY 74)

SUNSET AV

NEWPORT RD
BLVD
LN

WICKERD
PROJECT LOCATION #1CASA BLANCA (CIP 23-05)

MENIFEE RD

TRADEWINDS DR
PROJECT LOCATION #2WILLOWS/LAKE RIDGE (CIP 23-06)N

STOP STOPSTOP
KEY MAP-LOCATION #1N.T.S.

GRAND AVE.

CANNON DR.

GOLDEN HILL CT.

WILD SAGE CT.

CLIFF TOP CT.

SKEEN CT.

HUB CIR.

STOPSTOP STOP

STOPSTOP
STOP

STOPSTOPSTOP STOP
STOP
STOP
KEY MAP-LOCATION #2N.T.S.

LA PIEDRA RD.

WATERMILL LN.

MOON SHADOW DR.

MENIFEE RD.

BAYPORT LN.

MEADOW RUN PL.

BRIDEGE WATER LN.

MILL BRIDGE DR.

CRESCENT BEND CIR.

TEAL BROOK DR.

ROSE ISLE CT.

BAYPORT LN.

PIER POINTE CIR.

DOCKSIDE PL.

SHORE RIDGE DR.

BAYPOINTE CT.

SUN SET LAKE CIR.

SPINDRIFT CT.

WAVECREST CIR.

COVECREST CIR.

KEY MAP-LOCATION #1N.T.S.

BAVARIA DR.

EL PUENTE ST.

CORTE MAGDALENA
CANTERBURY ST.

CAM PERLA

CALLE HABERIO
HACIENDA DR.

CALLE ACER

ALTA VISTA WAY
CIP 23-05 CASA BLANCA& CIP 23-06

WILLOW/LAKE RIDGE RESURFACING
Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 4

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
337 of 1244

CONTACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 Page 1 of 2
P.O. #: 04986
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES AND/OR EXTRA WORK:

ITEM U/M QUANTITY % CHANGE UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 SF 16,626.00 34.5% 0.48 7,980.48$
2 LS 1.00 (141.00) (141.00)$
3 SF 17,931.00 137.9% 0.59$ 10,579.29$
4 LS 1.00 (144.00)$ (144.00)$
5 EA 1.00 14.3% 8,100.00$ 8,100.00$
6 LF 152.50 127.1% 91.00$ 13,877.50$
7 LS 1.00 (155.00)$ (155.00)$
8 SF 697.25 41.0% 19.00$ 13,247.75$
9 LS 1.00 (154.00)$ (154.00)$
10 SF 510.00 72.9% 37.00$ 18,870.00$
11 LS 1.00 (170.00)$ (170.00)$
12 EA 2.00 4.8% 600.00 1,200.00$
13 EA 3.00 30.0% 290.00 870.00$
14 LS 1.00 (3.00) (3.00)$
15 LF 91.50 73.2% 91.00 8,326.50$
16 LS 1.00 (146.00) (146.00)$
17 SF 1,565.75 87.0% $19.00 29,749.25$
18 LS 1.00 ($270.00) (270.00)$
BID ITEM 7 6 FOOT HEADER GRIND EXCEEDED THE BID

QUANTITIES
BID ITEM 8 LONGITUDINAL TAPER GRIND (0"-2.0")

EXCEEDED THE BID QUANTITIES
BID ITEM 9 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP

EXCEEDED THE BID QUANTITIES
BID ITEM 22 CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC SIDEWALK
BID ITEM 23 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE
1 WITH 6"/8" RETAINING CURB EXCEEDED THE BID

QUANTITIES
BID ITEM 26 RAISE MANHOLE FOR EMWD EXCEEDED

THE BID QUANTITIES
BID ITEM 33 INSTALL STOP BAR PLACEMENT EXCEEDED
DATE:

BID ITEM 35 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB & GUTTER EXCEEDED

THE BID QUANTITIES
2/15/2024

CASA BLANCA / WILLOWS / LAKERIDGE RESURFACING
CIP 23-05/06

COPP CONSTRUCTION, INC

DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME:

BID ITEM 10 CONSTRUCT 6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER

EXCEEDED THE BID QUANTITIES
BID ITEM 36 CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC SIDEWALK

EXCEEDED THE BID QUANTITIES
BID ITEM 23 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE
1 WITH 6"/8" RETAINING CURB EXCEEDED THE BID
QUANTITIES ABOVE 125% AND RECEIVED A DISCOUNT
BID ITEM 36 CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC SIDEWALK
EXCEEDED THE BID QUANTITIES ABOVE 125% AND

RECEIVED A DISCOUNT
The Contractor is hereby directed to make the herein described changes from the plans and specifications and/or perform the following described work not included in the Plans and Specifications for this project. Work items shall include labor, materials, neccesary for the performance and completion of the additional work.equipment, traffic control, and incidentals
BID ITEM 33 INSTALL STOP BAR PLACEMENT EXCEEDED
THE BID QUANTITIES ABOVE 125% AND RECEIVED A

DISCOUNT
BID ITEM 35 CONSTRUCT 6" CURB & GUTTER EXCEEDED
THE BID QUANTITIES ABOVE 125% AND RECEIVED A

DISCOUNT
BID ITEM 7 6 FOOT HEADER GRIND EXCEEDED THE BID
QUANTITIES ABOVE 125% AND RECEIVED A DISCOUNT
BID ITEM 8 LONGITUDINAL TAPER GRIND (0"-2.0")
EXCEEDED THE BID QUANTITIES ABOVE 125% AND

RECEIVED A DISCOUNT
BID ITEM 10 CONSTRUCT 6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
EXCEEDED THE BID QUANTITIES ABOVE 125% AND

RECEIVED A DISCOUNT
BID ITEM 22 CONSTRUCT 4" THICK PCC SIDEWALK
ABOVE 125% AND RECEIVED A DISCOUNT
PROJECT NO:

CONTRACTOR:

M:\Public Works Department\_Public Works Projects\CIP Projects\23-05 Casa Blanca Neighborhood Resurfacing\D- Construction\C-5 Change Orders (CCO) & Supporting Docs\CIP23-05 CCO-1 Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 5

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
338 of 1244

19 SF (988.40) -20.8% $28.00 (27,675.20)$
20 SY (1,704.00) -5.5% $5.95 (10,138.80)$
21 TN (49.89) -1.6% $138.00 (6,884.82)$
22 SF (500.00) 0.0% $53.00 (26,500.00)$
-$
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER: 40,418.95$ JUSTIFICATION: (Be specific on each item. Attach supporting documents as necessary) 0 ADDITIONAL WORKING DAYS WILL BE GRANTED TO CONTRACTOR DUE TO:

Page 2 of 2 ends

PREVIOUS
CCO # Amount % Additional Time Date Approved
Totals -$ 0.00% 0

CURRENT
CCO # Amount % Additional Time Date Approved
1 40,418.95$ 1.80%
40,418.95$ 1.80%
09/18/23
11/17/23

AUTHORIZATION BY CITY:

Recommended for approval by:

Additional Time (Working Days)
Revised Completion Date:
-$ Previous Change Order Amounts:

Items 1,3,5,6,8,10,12,13,15 and 17 are bid items that exceeded the original contract amount as verified by the City Inspector. Items 2,4,7,9,11,14,16 and 18 are bid items that exceeded 125% of the contract amount and received a discount per section 3-2.2.2 of the General Provisions.

Items 19-22 were bid items that were under the bid quantities, as determined by the City Inspector and are credited back to the City.

This document shall become an amendment to the Contract and all provisions of the Contract will apply hereto. This Change Order constitutes a complete and final resolution of all claims of the Contract for additional time or additional compensation related to or affected by work that is the subject of this Change Order. Quantities of items other than Lump Sum are not to exceed the amounts indicated.

CONTRACT VARIANCE SUMMARY
BID ITEM 16 PLACE 3/8" ARAM ACTUAL QUANTITIES

WERE UNDER THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
BID ITEM 17 PLACE 1.5" ARHM ACTUAL QUANTITIES

WERE UNDER THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
Date Started:

Original Completion Date:

Revised Contract Amount:
40,418.95$
2,283,921.80$
Current Change Order Amount:

Original Contract Amount:

Description
This is a cleanup change order demonstrating the bid items that exceeded the original contract as well as items that were under the original contract
TOTAL ALL CCOs
Description
2,243,502.85$
BID ITEM, 21 4" THICK PCC MORTAR MIX WAS NOT USED
BID ITEM 15 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE SPANDREL

ACTUAL QUANTITIES WERE UNDER THE ORIGINAL

CONTRACT AMOUNT
M:\Public Works Department\_Public Works Projects\CIP Projects\23-05 Casa Blanca Neighborhood Resurfacing\D- Construction\C-5 Change Orders (CCO) & Supporting Docs\CIP23-05 CCO-1 Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 6

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
339 of 1244

Date: __________ Date: __________
Project Manager
Approved by:

Date: __________ Date: __________
ACCEPTANCE BY CONTRACTOR:

Accepted by: Date: ____________________________
Signature
Please print name and title
___________________________________________________
______________________________ ________________________________ Diego Gullien, PE Don Sharp
______________________________ ________________________________ Nicolas Fidler, PE Armando Villa
Director of Public Works
Construction Manager
City Manager
___________________________________________________
We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the above described changes and/or extra work and hereby agree that said work is a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto.

M:\Public Works Department\_Public Works Projects\CIP Projects\23-05 Casa Blanca Neighborhood Resurfacing\D- Construction\C-5 Change Orders (CCO) & Supporting Docs\CIP23-05 CCO-1 Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 7

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
340 of 1244

Item Original Bid Qty Actual Qty Qty Overage CO Qtys Unit Price $ Amount Discount 7 65,000.00 81,626.00 16,626.00 16,626.00 0.48 7,980.48 -141.00 8 13,000.00 30,931.00 17,931.00 17,931.00 0.59 10,579.29 -144.00 9 7.00 8.00 1.00 1.00 8,100.00 8,100.00 10 120.00 272.50 152.50 152.50 91.00 13,877.50 -155.00 22 1,700.00 2,397.25 697.25 697.25 19.00 13,247.75 -154.00 23 700.00 1,210.00 510.00 510.00 37.00 18,870.00 -170.00 26 42.00 44.00 2.00 2.00 600.00 1,200.00 32 3,100.00 3,442.88
33 10.00 13.00 3.00 3.00 290.00 870.00 -3.00 35 125.00 216.50 91.50 91.50 91.00 8,326.50 -146.00 36 1,800.00 3,365.75 1,565.75 1,565.75 19.00 29,749.25 -270.00 37 700.00 1,556.50 856.50 856.50 37.00 31,690.50 -300.00 CO2 TEMP AC FOR MH 19.00 19.00 150.00 2,850.00 Total: 147,341.27
Discount Total: (1,483.00)
Quantity Overage Breakdown
Copp Contracting - Casa Blanca Community Resurfacing & Willows / Lake Ridge Community Resurfacing Project DocuSign Envelope ID: E43406E4-CAC7-46A7-9EFB-B4D44D94FD7D Item Title: 10.11
Contract Change Order and Notice of Completion and Acceptance for the Casa Blanca and Willows/Lake Ridge Communities Resurfacing Projects Item Page Number: 8

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
341 of 1244

CONTACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 Page 1 of 2
P.O. #: 04986
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGES AND/OR EXTRA WORK:

ITEM U/M QUANTITY % CHANGE UNIT PRICE TOTAL
1 SF 856.50 122.4% $37.00 31,690.50 $
2 LS 1.00 -$300.00 (300.00) $
3 EA 19.00 0.0% $150.00 2,850.00 $
4 EA (5.00) -10.4% $475.00 (2,375.00) $
5 EA (5.00) -10.4% $85.00 (425.00) $
6 SY (2,540.00) -6.2% $5.95 (15,113.00) $
7 TN (2.33) -9.3% $300.00 (699.00) $
-$
TOTAL ESTIMATED PRICE FOR THIS CHANGE ORDER: 15,628.50 $ JUSTIFICATION: (Be specific on each item. Attach supporting docu ments as necessary) 0ADDITIONAL WORKING DAYS WILL BE GRANTED TO CONTRACTOR DUE TO:

BID ITEM 37 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE
1 WITH 6"/8" RETAINING CURB EXCEEDED THE BID
QUANTITIES ABOVE 125% AND RECEIVED A DISCOUNT
2/15/2024 DATE:

COPP CONSTRUCTIN, INC
This document shall become an amendment to the Contract and all provisions of the Contract will apply hereto. This Change Order constitutes a complete and final resolution of all claims of the Contract for additional time or additional compensation related to or affected by work that is the subject of this Change Order. Quantities of items other than Lump Sum are not to exceed the amounts indicated.

DESCRIPTION
PROJECT NAME:

BID ITEM 37 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE
1 WITH 6"/8" RETAINING CURB EXCEEDED THE BID

QUANTITIES
BID ITEM 31 3/8" ARAM ACTUAL QUANTITIES WERE

UNDER THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
Items 1 and 3 are bid items that exceeded the orig inal contract amount as verified by the City Inspector. Item 2 is a bid item that exceeded 125% of the contract amount and received a discount per section 3-2.2.2 of the General Provisions.

Items 4-7 were bid items that were under the bid qu antities, as determined by the City Inspector and a re credited back to the City.

CIP 23-05/06
BID ITEM 34 4" FULL DEPTH AC PAVEMENT ACTUAL

QUANTITIES WERE UNDER THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT
AMOUNT
BID ITEM 13 PAINT VALVE CAN COVERS PER EMWD

ACTUAL QUANTITIES WERE UNDER THE ORIGINAL

CONTRACT AMOUNT

CASA BLANCA / WILLOWS / LAKERIDGE RESURFACING
The Contractor is hereby directed to make the herei n described changes from the plans and specificatio ns and/or perform the following described work not included in the Plans and Specifications for this project. Work items shall include labor, materials, neccesar y for the performance and completion of the additio nal work.equipment, traffic control, and incidentals

TEMPORARY AC FOR EMWD MH NOT IN THE ORIGINAL

CONTRACT
BID ITEM 12 RAISE WATER VALVE PER EMWD ACTUAL

QUANTITIES WERE UNDER THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT
AMOUNT
PROJECT NO:

CONTRACTOR:

M:\Public Works Department\_Public Works Projects\C IP Projects\23-05 Casa Blanca Neighborhood Resurfac ing\D- Construction\C-5 Change Orders (CCO) & Supporting Docs\CIP23-05 CCO-2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5BD31B03-5575-47A9-B9BB-4456E1E4F5BF Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 9

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
342 of 1244

Page 2 of 2 ends

PREVIOUS
CCO # Amount % Additional Time Date Approved
1 $ 40,418.95 1.80%
Totals 40,418.95 $ 1.80% 0

CURRENT
CCO # Amount % Additional Time Date Approved
2 15,628.50 $ 0.70%
56,047.45 $ 2.50%
09/18/23
11/17/23

AUTHORIZATION BY CITY:

Recommended for approval by:

Date: __________ Date: __________
Project Manager
Approved by:

Date: __________ Date: __________
ACCEPTANCE BY CONTRACTOR:

Accepted by: Date: ____________________________
Signature
Additional Time (Working Days)
Revised Completion Date:

CONTRACT VARIANCE SUMMARY
Revised Contract Amount:
15,628.50 $
2,299,550.30 $
This is a cleanup change order demonstrating the b id items that exceeded the original contract as well as items tha t were under the original contract
40,418.95 $ Previous Change Order Amounts:
2,243,502.85 $ Date Star ted:

Original Completion Date:

Current Change Order Amount:

Original Contract Amount:

Description
This is a cleanup change order demonstrating the b id items that exceeded the original contract as well as items tha t were under the original contract
TOTAL ALL CCOs
Description
____________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Diego Gullien, PE Don Sharp
________________________________________ ____________________________________________ Nicolas Fidler, PE Armando Villa
Director of Public Works
Construction Manager
City Manager
___________________________________________________ __
We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the above described changes and/or extra work and hereby agree that said work is a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto.

M:\Public Works Department\_Public Works Projects\C IP Projects\23-05 Casa Blanca Neighborhood Resurfac ing\D- Construction\C-5 Change Orders (CCO) & Supporting Docs\CIP23-05 CCO-2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 5BD31B03-5575-47A9-B9BB-4456E1E4F5BF PresidentEzekiel A. Copp
2/26/2024
2/26/2024
2/26/2024
2/26/2024
2/26/2024
Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 10

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
343 of 1244

4 7
9 0
9 Recording Requested By:

CITY OF MENIFEE
After Recording Mail To:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF MENIFEE
29844 HAUN ROAD
MENIFEE, CA 92586
Record without fee subject to Govt. Code 6103

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(Public Works – Civil Code Sec. 9204)
CASA BLANCA COMMUNITY RESURFACING PROJECT, CIP 23-05
WILLOWS/LAKE RIDGE COMMUNITY RESURFACING PROJECT, CIP 23-06 Notice is hereby given that:

Work of improvements on the project herein described was accepted as complete on April 17, 2024. The project consisted of resurfacing approximately 2.9 miles of existing pavement, reconstruction of 49 existing noncompliant curb ramps, replacement of striping and signing, and drainage improvements along various areas within the Casa Blanca, Willows, and Lake Ridge communities. The project was completed in the city right-of-way in the City of Menifee, County of Riverside, State of California.

1. The full name of the Owner is: CITY OF MENIFEE

2. The full address of the Owner is: 29844 HAUN ROAD
MENIFEE, CA. 92586

3. The undersigned is a Corporate Officer of the Owner of the interest stated below in the property herein described:

PUBLIC STREETS IN
MENIFEE, CA 92586

4. The name of the contractor for such work of construction is:

COPP CONTRACTING, INC.
6751 STANTON AVENUE
BUENA PARK, CA 90621

5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is within the City of Menifee, County of Riverside, State of California.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
Ss

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
I, Stephanie Roseen, hereby certify that I am the Acting City Clerk of the City of Menifee, a municipal corporation, which is the owner of the properties described within this Notice of Completion, executed on behalf of the City; that I have read the notice and know the contents thereof and that the facts therein stated are true of my own knowledge under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California; that I make this verification on _________________, 20___ for and on behalf of the City.
_____________________________
Stephanie Roseen, Acting City Clerk
Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 11

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
344 of 1244

Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 12

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
345 of 1244

Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 13

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
346 of 1244

Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 14

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
347 of 1244

Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 15

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
348 of 1244

Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 16

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
349 of 1244

Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 17

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
350 of 1244

Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 18

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
351 of 1244

Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 19

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
352 of 1244

Item Title: 10.11
Contract

Change

Order

and

Notice

of

Completion

and

Acceptance

for

the

Casa

Blanca

and

Willows/Lake

Ridge
Communities Resurfacing Projects
Item Page Number: 20

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
353 of 1244

CITY OF MENIFEE
SUBJECT: Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133
MEETING DATE: April 17, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Brandon Cleary, Associate Planner
REVIEWED BY: Cheryl Kitzerow, Community Development Director APPROVED BY: Armando G. Villa, City Manager
APPLICANT: Richland Ventures, Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Adopt a resolution adopting Addendum No. 2 to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 1989100207) for the Menifee North Specific Plan; and

2. Introduce an ordinance approving Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 (PLN21- 0276); and

3. Adopt a resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 (PLN21-0272) generally located at the southeast corner of Watson Road and Malone Avenue; and

4. Adopt a resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 38132 (PLN21-0274) generally located on the east side of Palomar Road, approximately 350 feet south of the of the Watson Road and Palomar Road intersection.

DISCUSSION
At the March 13, 2024, Planning Commission Meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to adopt a resolution recommending the City Council adopt the Addendum to the Menifee North Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”), the Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, and recommending the City Council approve all the entitlements for the Project. There were two public speakers on the item. One spokesman for the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters who spoke in favor of the project and another nearby resident who had questions and concerns about the future Planning Area (“PA”) 10 Park and the buffer condition between their lot and the proposed Project in PA 9.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 1

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
354 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 2 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
The Project was originally scheduled to be heard by the City Council on April 3, 2024. Staff requested, and the applicant concurred, to continue the public hearing to allow for further review of the Project attachments included with the staff report. The Project was continued to the April 17, 2024 City Council Meeting.

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment (“SPA”) No. 5 (PLN21-0276) proposes to modify PA 9 from Medium Residential (3.5 dwelling units per acre) to Medium High Residential (5.8 dwelling units per acre) to yield a difference in dwelling units from 106 to 170. The acreage for PA 9 is reduced from 30.5 to 29.4 due to changes in the frontage improvements and roadway configurations of Palomar Road and Junipero Road.

SPA No. 5 also proposes to combine PA 22 and PA 23A into PA22 and establish a Medium High Residential Use (5.5 dwelling units per acre) to yield 145 dwelling units. The acreage for PA 22 is decreasing from 29.1 acres to 26.5 due to changes in the frontage improvements and roadway configurations along Malone Avenue and Watson Road. The proposed SPA No. 5 allows 315 dwelling units across PA 9 and PA 22 while the original approved dwelling units within PA 9, 22 and 23A allowed 315 dwelling units. Therefore, there is no change to the total amount of dwelling units being proposed with SPA No. 5.

SPA No. 5 additionally proposes new development standards, permitted uses and establishes the approximate location of a tot lot and water quality basin within each affected PA.

Furthermore, SPA No. 5 proposes to redesignate PA 23B as PA 23A due to the consolidation of PA 22 and PA 23A. Modified language and acreage calculations are proposed throughout the Menifee North Specific Plan No. 260 (“SP 260”) document for consistency with the proposed SPA, as well as a previously County approved substantial conformance to remove planning areas outside the City of Menifee (east of Briggs Road) as these areas are located in unincorporated Riverside County. SPA No. 5 also provides updates to the Circulation Plan within SP 260 to be consistent with City of Menifee General Plan Circulation.

Tentative Tract Map (“TTM”) No. 38132 (PLN21-0274) proposes to subdivide PA 9 (29.4 acres) into 169 dwelling units at a density of 5.7 dwelling units per acre with the inclusion of a 0.15-acre tot lot and a 1.43-acre water quality basin. The lot sizes would range from 4,300 square feet to 11,801 square feet.

TTM No. 38133 (PLN21-0272) proposes to subdivide PA 22 (26.5 acres) into 145 dwelling units at a density of 5.5 dwelling units per acre with the inclusion of a 0.15-acre tot lot and a 1.6-acre water quality basin. The lot sizes would range from 3,700 square feet to 10,836 square feet.

Both developments are dependent on backbone storm drain infrastructure improvements (Line A-3) to be constructed.

Location
The Project is located in two separate areas within SP 260: PA 9 and newly proposed PA 22.

TTM No. 38132, proposed within PA 9, is generally located on the east side of Palomar Road, approximately 350 feet south of the Watson Road and Palomar Road intersection (APN’s: 329- 100-010 and 329-100-003).

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 2

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
355 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 3 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
TTM No. 38132
TTM No. 38133, proposed in proposed PA 22, is located at the southeast corner of Watson Road and Malone Road directly west of the Marion Ashley Community Center and Harvest Valley Elementary School (APN’s: 327-320-001, 327-320-014, 327-320-015, 327-320-017, and 327- 320-018).

TTM No. 38133
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 3

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
356 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 4 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
General Plan/Zoning
General Plan
The General Plan (“GP”) Land Use designation for the Project site is SP 260. The purpose of a specific plan is to provide detailed policies, standards, and criteria for the development of an area.

The proposed Project is located in two separate areas of SP 260. TTM No. 38132 is located in PA 9 and TTM No. 38133 is located in PA 22 and PA 23A of the approved specific plan land use map. Land Use designations and existing uses can be found in Table 1 (TTM No. 38132, PA 9) and Table 2 (TTM No. 38133, PA 22) on the following page.

The underlying zoning classification is SP 260, PA 9 (Medium Density Residential, 3.5 dwelling units per acre), PA 22 (Medium-High Density Residential, 5.1 dwelling units per acre) and PA 23 (High Density Residential, 8.5 dwelling units per acre).

Zoning
PA 9 and PA 22 of SP 260 tie back to the development standards and allowable uses from Riverside County Zoning Ordinance 348 Article VI (R-1 Zone, One Family Dwellings) while PA 23A of SP 260 ties back to the development standards and allowable uses from Article VIII (R-3 Zone, General Residential). The Applicant proposes to establish new development standards and allowable uses consistent with the proposed density, lot sizes and the City of Menifee Municipal Code (“MMC”). The development standards and allowable uses are consistent with the Medium Density Residential and Medium High Density Residential Zones from the MMC.

General Plan/Zone Map
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 4

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
357 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 5 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
TABLE 1 – SURROUNDING LAND USES – TTM 38132 PA 9
Location Existing Land Use General Plan Land
Use
Zoning Classification
North Existing Single Family
Residential
Rural Residential 1
acre Minimum (RR1)
Rural Residential 1 acre
Minimum (RR1)
East Vacant Menifee North
Specific Plan PA 10
(Community Park)
Menifee North Specific Plan
PA 10 (Community Park)
South Vacant Menifee North
Specific Plan PA
11A (Very High
Density Residential)
Menifee North Specific Plan
PA 11A (Very High Density
Residential)
West Existing Single Family
Residential (TR 29495)
Menifee North
Specific Plan PA 6
(Medium Density
Residential)
Menifee North Specific Plan
PA 6 (Medium Density
Residential)
TABLE 2 – SURROUNDING LAND USES – TTM 38133, PA 22
Location Existing Land Use General Plan Land Use Zoning Classification North Existing Single Family
Residential
Rural Residential 1
acre Minimum (RR1)
Rural Residential 1 acre
Minimum (RR1)
East Marion Ashley
Community Center and
Harvest Valley
Elementary School
Menifee North
Specific Plan PA 20
(Community
Center/Park) and PA
21 (School)
Menifee North Specific Plan
PA 20 (Community
Center/Park) and PA 21
(School)
South Vacant Menifee North
Specific Plan PA 23B
(Commercial)
Menifee North Specific Plan
PA 23B (Commercial)
West Existing Single Family
Residential and vacant
land
Rural Residential 1
acre Minimum (RR1),
PA 18 (Medium
Density Residential),
and PA19
(Commercial/Business
Park)
Rural Residential 1 acre
Minimum (RR1), PA 18
(Medium Density
Residential), and PA19
(Commercial/Business Park)
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 5

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
358 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 6 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
Proposed Menifee North Specific Plan Land Use
Background
SP 260 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors in 1994. Various amendments and substantial conformances have been approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors and the City of Menifee including:

1. SPA No. 1 – increased the total number of residential units to 2,602 and deleted PA 1 due to annexation by the City of Perris. (2004)

2. SPA No. 2 – increased the total number of residential units to 2,815, modified land use designations and unit counts for PA 7, 8, 10, 20, 23, and 48 along with modifications to the Circulation Plan for consistency with the Riverside County General Plan Circulation Element updates. (2008)

3. Substantial Conformance No. 1 to Amendment No. 2 – Riverside County Board of Supervisors removed the City of Menifee acreage from SP 260. This update was not reflected in the City of Menifee version of the SP 260. (2016)

4. SPA No. 3 – The City of Menifee approved modifications to PA 11, 12, 13, and 14 and formally removed the portions of SP 260 located outside of the City of Menifee boundary. (2020)

5. SPA No. 4 – The City of Menifee approved an increase to PA 2’s acreage in association with the Menifee Commerce Center project. (2022)
Previously Approved Tract Maps
There were two previously approved tract maps in PA 22 and PA 23. Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved TTM No. 33738 within PA 22 of SP 260, which consisted of 52 single- family residential units on 11.37 acres with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet and an overall density of 4.5 du/acre. This tentative tract map expired in December of 2022.

In PA 23A, Riverside County approved TTM No. 34600 in 2008 for a 153 detached single-family condominium map (alley loaded) on 18.3 acres with one recreational center and pool for an overall density of 8.36 du/acre. This tentative tract map expired in August of 2022.

Project Site TTM
38132
Project Site TTM
38133
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 6

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
359 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 7 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
PA 10 Community Park
SP 260 has requirements for the construction of a community park however, due to multiple property owners and various tracts already approved and built within the specific plan, a park Development Agreement is needed to ensure the funding and construction of the park. All future tracts are subject to a condition to enter into a park Development Agreement prior to map recordation to ensure funding is available and the park is constructed.

ANALYSIS
Proposed SPA No. 5
The purpose of SPA No. 5 is to modify planning area boundaries, unit counts, density, minimum lot sizes, permitted uses, and development standards for PA 9, PA 22 and PA 23A to facilitate development of proposed TTM No. 38132 and TTM No. 38133. There would be no change to the overall allowable number of units in the Specific Plan. The amendment also proposes ‘clean-up’ changes to various tables and language throughout SP 260 to note the removal of areas outside the City boundary processed with Amendment No. 3, Circulation Plan changes associated with City of Menifee General Plan consistency, and acreage and unit counts of PA 9 and PA 22 as they relate to the proposed tentative tract maps.

The proposed density and minimum lot size changes for PA 9 and PA 22 are proposed to provide a transition between higher density PA 11A and commercial PA 23 to the south respectively, which can include condominiums and apartments, and the rural residential land uses to the north.

The change in density specific to PA 9 from 3.5 to 5.8 is needed to meet the requirements of Senate Bill (“SB”) 330, which requires a no-net loss of residential units. TTM 38132 and TTM 38133 associated with this SPA propose to build 169 and 145 units respectively (314 total), an overall reduction of one unit allowed by the SPA No. 5, however, SPA No. 5 does allow up to 315 units. Therefore, SPA No. 5 is in compliance with SB330 which requires a no-net-loss in residential units when amending the number of allowed units within any residential zone.

PA 9
Currently, PA 9 is designated as Medium Density Residential allowing for 106 dwelling units at

3.5 du/acre on a 30.5-acre site with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. The Applicant proposes to modify the allowable number of dwelling units from 106 units to 170 units, establish the allowable density from 3.5 (Medium Density Residential) to 5.8 du/acre (Medium High Density Residential), and decrease the minimum lot size from 7,200 square feet to 4,300 square feet.

Additionally, PA 11A to the south is designated as Very High Density Residential (14.1-24 du/acre) for which the proposed changes in minimum lot size and density to PA 9 will act as a transition between the rural residential uses to the north and the very high density to the south.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 7

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
360 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 8 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
Menifee North SPA Proposed Land Use Map PA 9
Development Standards
SPA No. 5 proposes to establish development standards for PA 9 due to the reduced minimum lot size and increased density. Table 3 on the following page details the approved and proposed development standards for PA 9.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 8

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
361 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 9 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
TABLE 3 – APPROVED VS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PA 9 Lot Dimensions (minimum) in feet
Approved Proposed
Lot Area 7,200 square feet 4,300 square feet
Lot Width 60 48
Lot Depth 100 90
Frontage 60 40
Frontage (Cul-De-Sac or
Knuckle)
35 35
Setbacks (minimum)
Front Yard to Livable Space
or Porch
20 15 to living space, 10 to
porch
Front Yard to Garage Door 20 20
Front Yard to Side-on Garage
Door
20 10
Corner Side Yard 10 feet unless from street line,
if yard is less than 50 feet
wide, the setback shall be no
more than 20% of the width of
the lot
10; or 5, if corner side yard
abuts a landscape slope.

In no case shall setback be
less than 10 feet when
measured from ROW
Interior Side Yard 10% of the width of the lot, but
not less than 3 feet or more
than 5 feet
5 Rear Yard 10 15 with a minimum of 10-
foot level area
Building Coverage (maximum)
Building Coverage (percent) 50% 60% (one story)
55% (two story)
Permitted Uses
The Project proposes a list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses for PA 9 shown in Table 4 on the following page. These proposed uses are consistent with State law and the MMC for zones of similar lot sizes and density including the Medium Density Residential and Medium High Density Residential. In SP 260 PA 9, the ordinance originally tied back to the R-1 zone from the Riverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348 which allowed for a wider range of uses due to the minimum lot size being a minimum of 7,200 square feet.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 9

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
362 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 10 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
TABLE 4 – PERMITTED USES FOR PA 9
Permitted Uses – Planning Area 9 (Medium-High Density Residential) Use Category Permitted Uses Planning Area 9
P = Permitted (1) – C = Conditional Use Permit
Accessory Dwelling Units
(ADU)
P1
Bed and Breakfast
establishment
C
Congregate Care Facilities C
Family day care, small P
Group residential facility, six
or fewer residents
P
Guest house, accessory to
single family detached
P1
Home occupation P1
Residential
Single family detached P
Parks and recreation areas P
Public utility facilities C
Temporary real estate tract
offices
P
Non-residential
Waterbodies, flood control
facilities, including drainage
channels, basins, access
roads, and any other
drainage infrastructure
improvements
P
Notes:
1) Additional approvals may be required pursuant to provisions of Chapter 9.35 of the City Zoning Ordinance.

TTM No. 38132 (PA 9)
The proposed TTM No. 38132 would incorporate a 169-unit single-family detached subdivision consistent with the proposed PA 9 development standard amendments noted above and include a tot lot and water quality basin.

Site Layout/Circulation
Primary access includes one point on Palomar Road and a secondary point on Junipero Road.

The Project would construct frontage improvements, as well as a small portion of offsite improvements along Junipero Road (currently dirt). The street layout for the Project would provide access to all the proposed single-family and open space lots including the tot lot and water quality basin. Lots along the northern perimeter of the tract are proposed to have an increased square footage to provide a land use transition/buffer between the existing adjacent Rural Residential one acre lots to the north and the smaller lot sizes within the Project. A tot lot is proposed toward the center of the tract along with a water quality basin in the southwest corner of the Project.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 10

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
363 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 11 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
Proposed Site Plan
Landscaping and Open Space
A total of 120,581 square feet of landscaping would be maintained by the Homeowner’s Association (“HOA”) which would include various species of trees, shrubs and groundcover. Areas maintained by the HOA would include street parkways, buffer landscape around the proposed basin and perimeter landscaping around the Project. An additional 14,095 square feet would be maintained by the Community Facilities District (“CFD”). The Project is conditioned to annex into the CFD prior to map recordation.

An HOA maintained tot lot is provided toward the center of the Project adjacent to lot 126 and lot 152, and would include picnic benches with overhead shade structure, bike racks, drinking fountain, playground equipment, open turf area and a security fence to prevent interaction with the adjacent streets. The tot lot would also incorporate screening (trees, shrubs and community block wall) along the east and south sides of the lot to assist in screening any noise or visual impacts from adjacent dwelling units (lot 126 and lot 152).

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 11

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
364 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 12 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
Conceptual Landscape and Tot Lot Plan

Walls, Fencing and Monument Signage
A six-foot split-faced masonry block wall with cap and pilasters (community wall) would be constructed around the perimeter of the tract with vinyl privacy fences between each lot. The proposed water quality basin would incorporate a wrought iron fence around the perimeter with a concrete access road.

The Project includes two entry monument signs, one at each entrance that incorporates various plant materials including succulents, grass and trees along with a wooden styled metal signage framed by boulders. The tot lot would also incorporate a neighborhood park monument sign consistent with the entry monument signs.

Proposed Monument Signs

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 12

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
365 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 13 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
PA 22
The Applicant proposes to combine PA 22 and PA 23A into PA 22 to facilitate the development of TTM No. 38133. Currently, as approved, PA 22 is designated as Medium High Density Residential with allowing for 56 dwelling units to be built with a density of 5.1 du/acre on a 11- acre site requiring a minimum 5,000 square foot lot size. PA 23A is currently designated as High Density Residential, with 153 garden court loaded detached single-family units at 8.5 du/acre on an 18.1-acre site.

The proposal to combine both PA 22 and PA 23A and designate as Medium High Density Residential would allow a combined 26.5-acre site to be developed with 145 single-family detached units at 5.5 du/acre requiring a minimum 3,700 square foot lot size. In the proposed land use map below, the blue and purple asterisk indicate approximate locations of the proposed tot lot and water quality basin respectively.

Menifee North SPA Proposed Land Use Map PA 22
Development Standards
SPA No. 5 proposes to establish development standards for PA 22 consistent with the applicable City of Menifee Medium Density Residential and Medium High Density Residential Zone. Table 5 details the approved (PA 22 and 23A) and proposed (PA 22) development standards for PA 22 and PA 23A
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 13

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
366 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 14 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
TABLE 5 – APPROVED (PA 22 AND 23A) AND PROPOSED (PA22) DEVELOPMENT

STANDARDS LOT DIMENSIONS (MINIMUM) IN FEET
Approved PA 22 Approved PA 23A Proposed PA 22
Lot Area 7,200 square feet 7,200 square feet 3,700
Lot Width 60 60 42
Lot Depth 100 100 90
Frontage 60 - 40
Frontage (Cul-De-
Sac or Knuckle)
35 - 35
Setbacks (minimum)
Front Yard to Livable
Space or Porch
20 10 feet for building
less than 35 feet in
height, for portions of
the building above 35
feet in height a 10 foot
setback plus two
additional feet for
each foot above 35
feet in height
15 to living space,
10 to porch
Front Yard to Garage
Door
20 - 20
Front Yard to Side-
on Garage Door
20 - 10
Corner Side Yard 10 feet unless from
street line, if yard is
less than 50 feet wide,
the setback shall be
no more than 20% of
the width of the lot
10 10; or 5, if corner
side yard abuts a
landscape slope.

In no case shall
setback be less
than 10 feet when
measured from
ROW
Interior Side Yard 10% of the width of
the lot, but not less
than 3 feet or more
than 5 feet
5 feet for buildings
that do not exceed 35
feet in height, for
buildings above 35
feet in height a
minimum of 5 feet
plus 2 feet for each
foot above 35 feet
5 Rear Yard 10 10 feet unless the rear
joins a street, then it
shall be the same as
the front setback
15 with a minimum
of 10-foot level
area
Building Coverage (maximum)
Building Coverage
(percent)
50% 50% 60% (one story)
55% (two story)
Floor Area Ratio
(FAR)
- 2:1 not including
basement area
-
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 14

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
367 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 15 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
Permitted Uses
The Project proposes a list of permitted and conditionally permitted uses for PA 22 shown in Table 6 below. These proposed uses are consistent with State law and the MMC for zones of similar lot sizes and density including the MDR and MHDR. In SP 260, PA 22, the ordinance originally tied back to the R-1 zone from the Riverside County Zoning Ordinance No. 348 which allowed for a wider range of uses due to the minimum lot size being a minimum of 7,200 square feet. SP 260 Area 23A previously tied back to Riverside County Zoning Ordinance 348 R-3 Zone.

TABLE 6 – PERMITTED USES FOR PA 22
– Planning Area 22 (Medium-High Density Residential)
Use Category Permitted Uses Planning Area 22
P = Permitted (1) – C = Conditional Use Permit
Accessory Dwelling Units
(ADU)
P1
Bed and Breakfast
establishment
C
Congregate Care Facilities C
Family day care, small P
Group residential facility, six
or fewer residents
P
Guest house, accessory to
single family detached
P1
Home occupation P1
Residential
Single family detached P
Parks and recreation areas P
Public utility facilities C
Temporary real estate tract
offices
P
Non-residential
Waterbodies, flood control
facilities, including drainage
channels, basins, access
roads, and any other
drainage infrastructure
improvements
P
Notes:
2) Additional approvals may be required pursuant to provisions of Chapter 9.35 of the City Zoning Ordinance.

TTM No. 38133 (PA 22)
The proposed TTM No. 38133 would incorporate a 145-unit single-family detached subdivision consistent with the proposed PA 22 development standard amendments noted above, and include a tot lot and water quality basin. The minimum lot size within this planning area is 3,700 square feet with 30% being below 4,000 square feet, 56% being between 4,000 and 5,000 square feet and 14% above 5,000 square feet.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 15

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
368 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 16 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
Site Layout/Circulation
The Project includes multiple access points, including two on Malone Avenue (at Calle De Caballos and Varela Lane) and one on Briggs Road. The Project would construct frontage improvements. The Briggs Road access is shared with the existing cul-de-sac, Recreation Circle, used by the Marion Ashley Community Center. An emergency vehicle and pedestrian only access is provided approximately 175 feet south of the Watson Road and Malone Avenue intersection in between lots 62 and 63. This emergency only access is to accommodate the secondary access requirement from the MMC and Subdivision Ordinance. The northern portion of the Project only has one access point, requiring the need for a secondary access point. Due to City of Menifee intersection spacing requirements, an emergency only access point would be needed to fulfill this requirement. The street layout for the Project would provide access to all the proposed single- family and open space lots including the tot lot and water quality basin. A tot lot is proposed adjacent to the water quality basin at the northeast corner of Varela Lane and Malone Avenue.

Proposed Site Plan
Landscaping and Open Space
A total of 190,176 square feet of landscaping would be maintained by the HOA which would include various species of trees, shrubs and groundcover. Areas maintained by the HOA would include street parkways, buffer landscape around the proposed basin and perimeter landscaping around the Project. An additional 15,924 square feet of landscaping would be maintained by the CFD. The project is conditioned to annex into the CFD prior to map recordation.

An HOA maintained tot lot is provided in between the water quality basin and lot 125 that would include picnic benches with overhead shade structure, bike racks, drinking fountain, playground equipment, open turf area and a security fence to prevent interaction with the adjacent streets.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 16

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
369 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 17 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
The tot lot would also incorporate screening (trees, shrubs and community block wall) along the east and south sides of the lot to assist in screening any noise or visual impacts from the adjacent dwelling unit (lot 125). A landscaped paseo is also provided behind lots 5 through 17 to allow pedestrian access to the Marion Ashley Community Center parallel to Street “E” near the southern end of the Project.

The emergency vehicle and pedestrian only access point is also conditioned to provide shrubs adjacent to the block walls of the surrounding residential lots and removable bollards. This access point would provide pedestrian access closer to Watson Road.

Conceptual Landscape and Tot Lot Plan

Walls, Fencing and Monument Signage
A six-foot split-faced masonry block wall with cap and pilasters (community wall) would be constructed around the perimeter of the tract with vinyl privacy fences between each lot. The proposed water quality basin would incorporate a wrought iron fence around the perimeter with a concrete access road.

The Project would include two entry monument signs, one at each western entrance along Malone Avenue that incorporates various plant materials including succulents, grass and trees along with a wooden styled metal signage framed by boulders. The tot lot would also incorporate a neighborhood park monument sign consistent with the entry monument signs.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 17

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
370 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 18 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
Proposed Monument Signs

Public Comment
A public comment letter was received from a nearby resident voicing her concerns with the proposed Project which included the following concerns:
•Increased development of the City;
•Proximity to existing agricultural farm and animal uses; •Reductions to lot sizes, yards, privacy and quality of life; •Increased pedestrian and vehicular traffic with adjacent schools and surrounding neighborhoods; and
•Flooding in the area
The full public comment letter was provided to the City Council during the April 3, 2024, meeting and is attached to this staff report.

Environmental Determination
A Certified Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) for the approved Project was certified by the County in December of 1994 (State Clearinghouse No. 1989100207). The Certified EIR addressed potential impacts to the physical environment that would or may occur from implementation of the approved Project. An Addendum (second addendum to SP-260’s EIR) to the Certified EIR has been prepared in accordance with Sections 15162 and 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines. The City, as the lead agency under CEQA, has prepared an Addendum to the Certified EIR to consider environmental impacts associated with proposed SPA and associated TTMs, which would entail changes to the Approved Menifee North Specific Plan PA 9, PA 22, and PA 23A. The amendment proposes changes to the aforementioned Planning Areas including, the combining of PA 22 and PA 23A, density, minimum lot sizes, development standards, land uses and number of proposed dwelling units.

Addendum No. 2 examines whether, as a result of any changes or any new information, a subsequent EIR may be required. The proposed changes that would result from the development of the proposed Project would not result in any of the conditions outlined in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162(a)(1) to (3) because the proposed changes would not result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects requiring major revisions to the Certified EIR, and, as explained herein, no new information Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 18

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
371 of 1244

City of Menifee Staff Report
Menifee North SPA No. 5 & TTMs
April 17, 2024

Page 19 of 19 ends

2 1
4 7
of substantial importance meets any of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (a)(3).

Accordingly, this Addendum provides the substantial evidence required by CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) to support the finding that a subsequent EIR is not required and an addendum to the Certified EIR is the appropriate environmental document to address changes to the proposed Project.

Addendum No. 2 to the EIR, as well as all its technical appendices, can be accessed for review on the City website: https://www.cityofmenifee.us/325/Environmental-Notices-Documents.

Findings
Findings for the EIR Addendum No. 2, SPA, TTM No. 38132, and TTM No. 38133 are included in the attached resolutions and ordinance.

Public Notice
A public hearing notice for the proposed Project was published in The Press Enterprise on March 24, 2024 for the April 3, 2024 City Council hearing. All relevant public agencies, including all interested parties, were notified of the public hearing as were all property owners within a 300- foot radius of the project site. On-site posting was also provided. During the April 3, 2024 meeting the public hearing was continued to a date certain, April 17, 2024. No additional notices were required.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE
Thriving Economy

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS

1. TTM 38132 Project Exhibits

2. TTM 38133 Project Exhibits

3. Resolution – FEIR Addendum

4. Exhibit A – Final Addendum

5. Exhibit B – Certified EIR Menifee North Specific Plan

6. Ordinance – SPA

7. Exhibit A – SPA No. 5 Change Pages

8. Resolution – TTM No. 38132

9. Exhibit A - TTM 38132 Conditions of Approval

10. Resolution – TTM No. 38133

11. Exhibit A - TTM 38133 Conditions of Approval

12. Public Hearing Notice

13. Public Comment Letter
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 19

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
372 of 1244

~
~
~
~
~
~
~

RED APPLE ROAD

GALA CIRCLE

CINNAMONCREEK CIR

WATSON ROADWATSON ROAD

PALOMAR ROAD
PM 10543
P.M.B 47/24
GP-RR1
ZONING-RR1
PM 11278
P.M.B 50/62
GP-RR1
ZONING-RR1
329-090-022
VACANT
GP-PUC

ZONING-PUC
329-090-022
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP
329-090-020
VACANT
329-090-019
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP
329-090-021
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP
329-100-033
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP (VHDR)
329-100-031
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP (VHDR)
106 105
90 91
93949596979899
100
101
102
103104
8985 86 87 8884
78 80
77 81 82 83
139
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138 116
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
107
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
72 73
74 TOT LOT
75 169
165
166
167
168
164
70 71
153
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
68 69
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 48
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 40
32 3334
35 36
37 38
39 31
28 29
30 27 1719202122232425
26 18
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
LOT 171

WATER QUALITY BASIN
174 L.&S.
176 L.&S.
174 L.&S.
182 L.&S.
183 L.&S.185 L.&S.
175 L.&S.
181 L.&S.
180 L.&S.

TR. 38132-1
TR. 38132-F

A STREET

B STREET

CIDER STREET
TRACT NO. 29495-1
M.B. 334/87-90
GP-SP

ZONING-SP
TRACT NO. 29495-6
M.B. 386/31-33
GP-SP

ZONING-SP
329-100-034 VACANT

GP-SP ZONING-SP (VHDR)

B STREET

C STREET

C STREET

G STREET

F STREET

E STREET

D STREET

H STREET PHASE LINE
LOT 187
154
140
126
117
108
92 79
76 178 L.&S.
125
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 SQ. FT.
4,326
4,359
4,386
4,386
4,386
4,777
4,585
4,719
4,810
4,513
7,661
11,801
7,625
7,212
7,228
7,228
7,219
7,364
7,801
5,761
5,038
5,040
5,773
4,400
4,334
4,530
4,562
4,562
4,635
5,074
5,028
4,882
7,244
7,210
4,839
5,003
4,384
4,416
4,323
7,181
5,285
4,364
4,540
4,512
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
4,512
4,512
4,476
4,380
4,416
4,459
4,501
4,387
4,365
4,654
4,704
4,792
4,780
5,384
4,410
4,423
4,497
4,508
5,553
5,301
5,087
5,053
5,019
4,985
4,951
4,917
4,907
4,530
5,354
8,470
6,290
4,710
4,884
5,001
4,955
4,397
4,320
4,335
4,626
4,608
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
TOTAL
4,830
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,333
4,697
4,680
5,161
4,649
5,037
5,038
4,999
4,959
4,920
4,880
4,841
4,801
4,761
4,722
4,682
4,643
4,603
4,564
4,524
4,788
4,359
4,386
4,386
4,386
4,777
4,585
4,719
4,810
4,513
7,661
11,801
7,625
7,212
7,228
7,228
7,219
7,364
7,801
5,761
5,004
5,040
5,773
4,400
4,304
4,181
4,226
4,219
4,286
4,721
4,675
4,461
6,884
7,210
4,839
4,981
4,365
4,416
4,323
7,181
5,054
4,081
4,260
4,262

LOT TABLE
TRACT NO. 38132
SQ. FT. SQ. FT.

LOT TABLE
TRACT NO. 38132 CONT.

SQ. FT. SQ. FT.

LOT TABLE
TRACT NO. 38132 CONT.

SQ. FT.
4,235
4,225
4,158
4,363
4,416
4,459
4,501
4,387
4,365
4,262
4,334
4,335
3,787
5,331
4,410
4,423
4,497
4,508
5,553
5,301
5,087
5,053
5,019
4,985
4,951
4,917
4,907
4,530
5,354
8,470
6,290
4,710
4,884
5,001
4,914
4,332
4,320
4,314
4,318
4,320
4,503
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,320
4,303
4,314
4,322
4,744
4,649
5,037
5,038
4,999
4,959
4,920
4,880
4,841
4,801
4,761
4,722
4,682
4,643
4,603
4,564
4,524
4,778
4,301
LOT NO. LOT AREA PAD AREA LOT AREA PAD AREA LOT AREA PAD AREALOT NO. LOT NO.

AVERAGE

AREA SF

MIN LOT
4,320
4,953
3,787
4,859
7,228 7,228
7,228 7,228
7,228 7,228
7,228 7,228
4,839 4,839
4,839 4,839
4,839 4,839
4,839 4,839
4,416 4,416
4,416 4,416
4,416 4,416
4,704 4,334
4,704 4,335
4,410 4,410
4,410 4,410
4,410 4,410
4,508 4,508
4,508 4,508
4,508 4,508
4,508 4,508
4,320 4,320
4,320 4,320
4,320 4,320
4,320 4,320
4,680 4,332
4,680 4,343
4,680 4,353
4,680 4,364
4,680 4,371
4,680 4,374
4,680 4,376
4,680 4,377
4,680 4,379
4,680 4,380
4,680 4,381
4,512 4,250
4,416 4,416
4,416 4,416
4,320 4,320
4,320 4,320
4,320 4,320
4,320 4,320
4,320 4,320
4,320 4,320
4,608 4,320
4,608 4,320
4,608 4,320
4,608 4,320
4,608 4,320
4,608 4,320
837,036 821,177

SUMMARY
TOTAL 837,036 821,177
SQ. FT. SQ. FT.

LOT AREA PAD AREA
4,359 4,359
4,359 4,359
4,359 4,359
4,359 4,359
4,704 4,334
SQ. FT.

TRACT NO. 38132 CONT.

WQ BASIN / CITY-CFD & VALLEY-WIDE
LOT AREALOT NO.

NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS / MAINTENANCE

USE / MAINTENANCE
171
172
173
174
175
176
62,335
12,589
9,457
11,582
404
4,426
L.&S. W/ DRAINAGE DITCH / VALLEY-WIDE OR HOA
177 1,051
178 1,141
179 886
180 552
181 487
182 1,071
183 1,177
184 1,168
185 1,152
186 449

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE
187 6,899 TOT LOT/ VALLEY-WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / CITY-CFD OR VALLEY-WIDE
6'
S/W
\A1;22'
%%UCOLLECTOR STREET
\A1;10' \A1;12'
\A1;8'
\A1;SWALE
\A1;12'
PROP. W'LY R/W
FUTURE
E'LY R/W

JUNIPERO ROAD

2.0%%%2.0%%%

2.0%%%
\A1;FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
\A1;37'
\A1;STREET DEDICATION
NTS
CITY OF MENIFEE STD. NO. 113
\A1;20'\A1;20'EXIST. W'LY R/W EXIST. E'LY R/W
VARIES
VARIES
\A1;15'
\A1;LS
\A1;5'
\A1;LS
\A1;17' FUTURE
\A1;STREET DEDICATION
PAVED
SHDLR
\A1;20'
%%UPARTIAL COLLECTOR STREET
\A1;20' \A1;10'
\A1;SWALE

2.0%%%2.0%%%
NTS

JUNIPERO ROAD NORTH TO WATSON ROAD
EXIST. W'LY R/W EXIST. E'LY R/W
VARIES
\A1;30'
\A1;50'
\A1;6'
PAVED
SHDLR
\A1;6'
PAVED
SHDLR

{\LPALOMAR ROAD}
\A1;12'
NTS

MODIFIED SECONDARY HIGHWAY
\A1;64' EXIST. R/W
\A1;6'

CLASS II
BIKE
TRAIL
\A1;6'
\A1;6'
\A1;32'\A1;12'
\A1;12'
\A1;6'

CLASS II
BIKE
TRAIL
(PROP.)
\A1;6'\A1;6'
\A1;32' \A1;12'
\A1;20'
\A1;88'
EXIST. E'LY R/W PROP. E'LY R/WEXIST. W'LY R/W

EXISTING

IMPROVEMENTS

PROPOSED

IMPROVEMENTS
*NOTE: PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO

MEANDER AROUND EXISTING

POWER POLES (LOCATED
APPROX. 3' E/O CF)
\A1;PROPOSED DEDICATION
\A1;24'
(2.0%%%) 2.0%%%(2.0%%% %%P) 2.0%%%
PAVED
SHDLR

2.0%%%
R/W \A1;56'

2.0%%%
\A1;PRKWY.
\A1;36'\A1;10'

2.0%%%
\A1;10'
R/W

2.0%%%
\A1;PRKWY.
6'
S/W
NTS
CITY OF MENIFEE STD. NO. 115,

MODIFIED
"A" THROUGH "I" STREETS
%%UVICINITY MAP
N.T.S.

T5S, R3W, SECTION 11
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38132

CITY OF MENIFEE
LOTS 43, 44, 53, 54, 59 AND 60 OF ROMOLA FARMS IN THE CITY OF MENIFEE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE HWY.

MENIFEE ROAD

JUNIPERO ROAD

PALOMAR ROAD
ANTELOPE RD.

WATSON ROAD
MATTHEWS RD.

PROJECT SITE
RED APPLE RD.

CIDER ST.

SCHEDULE "A"

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP

CITY OF MENIFEE
SHEET

OF SHEET
DWG. NO. ____
KO
BB/BM
Checked By:

Scale: AS SHOWN
Drawn By:

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION APDDATE
REV Engineering, Inc.
357 N. SHERIDAN STREET

ENGINEERINGSURVEYING
SUITE 117
CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92880
TEL. (951) 279-1800
FAX (951) 279-4380
Drawing: R:\\280967\\PA 9 - TTM 38132\\Preliminary\\TTM 38132\\967 - TTM 38132 - 001.dwg Layout: 30x42 L Saved: 1/29/2024 8:30 AM Plotted: 1/29/2024 8:32 AM Plot Scale: 1:2.93 By: Beverly Marinas %%UMOBILE HOME AND R.V. PARKING
%%UDISPOSAL
%%UAERIAL TOPOGRAPHY
VACANT
MENIFEE NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP260) -
SCHEDULE "A"
%%uUTILITIES AND SERVICES
%%UEXISTING USE%%uPROPOSED USE
%%UZONING - CURRENT
RESIDENTIAL/WATER QUALITY BASIN %%UASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER %%UPROPOSED STORM DRAINS%%UGEOLOGIC HAZARD NOTE
%%uPROPERTY ACREAGE
GROSS AREA = 31.2 AC
THOMAS GUIDE RIVERSIDE (2007) PAGES 808 F-8
%%UGENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
SPECIFIC PLAN %%USECTIONS, TOWNSHIPS AND
%%uTHOMAS BROTHERS MAP
A PORTION OF T.5S, R.3W, SECTION 11
%%UWELLS
%%UCOMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN COMMUNITY SERVICES

1.4 AC

1.2 AC

WATER QUALITY BASIN

OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPE SLOPE
%%UPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

NOT WITHIN LIMITS OF STUDY PER FEMA PANEL
%%UOWNER/ APPLICANT%%uENGINEER
CORONA, CA 92880
PROJECT MANAGER: JUSTIN SAKAKURA, P.E.

PHONE: (951) 279-1800
K & A ENGINEERING, INC.
357 N. SHERIDAN STREET, SUITE 117

19.2 ACRESIDENTIAL LOTS
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
%%UAGENCY SERVING THE AREA %%UFACILITIES PRESENT
NET TOTAL AREA = 29.4 AC
IRVINE, CA 92612
ATTN: %%UBRIAN HARDY

WSI LAND HOLDINGS, LLC
3161 MICHELSON DR., SUITE 425
PH: 949-698-2191
%%UACRES
169PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOTS:

7.6 ACROADWAYS
329-100-003 AND 329-100-010
PROPOSED DRAINAGE & STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH SUBDIVISION. STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF MENIFEE \W0.8500;PROJECT SITE IS NOT SUBJECT TO LIQUEFACTION GEOLOGIC HAZARDS: ALQUIST-PRIOLO OR SPECIAL STUDIES ZONE \W0.8500;THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXISTING WELLS ON SITE OR WITHIN 200 FEET OF PROPERTY ARROWHEAD MAPPING CORP. - DATED
4/12/2021 P.O. BOX 9791
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92427
\W0.8500;THERE IS NO SUBSURFACE SEPTIC DISPOSAL PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT. \W0.8500;THERE IS NO DESIGNATED MOBILE HOME OR R.V. PARKING PARKING FACILITIES PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT.

REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MENIFEE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOTS 43, 44, 53, 54, 59 AND 60 OF ROMOLA FARMS, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 12, PAGE 71 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.ELECTRIC:

GAS:

TELEPHONE:

CABLE TV: WATER:

SEWER:

SCHOOL DIST:

SCHOOL DIST:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.

FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS

TIME WARNER

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

ROMOLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
{\LEARTHWORK QUANTITIES:}
RAW CUT = 76,660 CY
{RAW FILL = 25,800 CY
}SUBTOTAL = 50,860 CY
{ADJUSTMENTS = -10,480 CY
}EXPORT = 40,380 CY
ALLOWABLE DENSITY:

PROPOSED DENSITY:

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 5.1-8 DU/AC

5.7 DU/ACHIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

THIS PROJECT REPRESENTS THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS
%%UCONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP
OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER.
{\LRECYCLED WATER NOTE:}

RECYCLED WATER WILL NOT BE USED FOR ONSITE
LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION. NOT A RECYCLED WATER CANDIDATE PER EMWD.

MENIFEE NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP260 - A4) -
%%UZONING - PROPOSED
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL WATER AND WATER RIGHTS AS CONVEYED BY DEED FROM ALEXANDER HURSH IN FAVOR OF WATSON WATER COMPANY, DATED DECEMBER 27, 1926 AND RECORDED JANUARY 6, 1927 IN BOOK 699, PAGE 480 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

ALSO EXCEPTING ONE-HALF OF ALL OIL AND PETROLEUM AS RESERVED BY CLARENCE M. THOMAS, VIVA G. THOMAS AND ALICE E. THOMAS, THEIR HEIRS OR ASSIGNS, BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 5, 1925 IN BOOK 644, PAGE 35 OF DEEDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDS. {\LGENERAL NOTES:}

1.NO EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE SITE

2.ALL PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL BE AT 2:1 MAX, UNLESS

OTHERWISE SHOWN

3.ALL PROPOSED STREETS SHALL BE PUBLIC STREETS

4.FINAL MAP CAN BE PHASED

5.PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN AN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE
{\LBENCHMARK:}
A STANDARD C.&G.S. BRASS DISK AS DESCRIBED BY COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY 1935 5.7 MI NW FROM WINCHESTER, 4.9 MILES

NORTH AND WEST ALONG OILED ROADS FROM THE ATCHISON,

TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY STATION AT WINCHESTER,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, THENCE 0.8 MILE NORTH ALONG THE JUNIPER SPRINGS ROAD, 0.1 MILE WEST OF A CURVE NEAR A ROCKY POINT, 50 YARDS EAST OF THE JUNCTION OF A DIRT ROAD LEADING NORTH, 58 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD, AND IN THE TOP OF THE MIDDLE ONE OF THE THREE LARGE EMBEDDED BOULDERS.

A STANDARD DISK, STAMPED S 311 1935.

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BENCHMARK I.D. M-108
{ELEVATION: 1722.499 (NGVD 29')}
PLANNING AREA 9 - MDR
PLANNING AREA 9 - MHDR
DISTRICT - HOMELAND 43
%%URANGES
NET AREA = 29.4 AC
AND 838 E-1
NO. 06065C2060H
0 SCALE: 1"=100'
100 200 300
{\LSITE MAP / PHASING MAP}
1 2
NO. 38132
%%UEXISTING EASEMENT NOTES %%UDISPOSITION

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN
50' WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SCE FOR PUBLIC UTILITY, INGRESS, EGRESS, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED 12-09-1952 IN BOOK 1422, PAGE 441 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 50' WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SCE FOR PUBLIC UTILITY, INGRESS, EGRESS, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED 12-09-1952 IN BOOK 1422, PAGE 448 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 50' WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SCE FOR PUBLIC UTILITY, INGRESS, EGRESS, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED 12-09-1952 IN BOOK 1422, PAGE 442 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 50' WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SCE FOR PUBLIC UTILITY, INGRESS, EGRESS, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED 11-20-1952 IN BOOK 1417, PAGE 341 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 50' WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SCE FOR PUBLIC UTILITY, INGRESS, EGRESS, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED 12-09-1952 IN BOOK 1422, PAGE 445 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 50' WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SCE FOR PUBLIC UTILITY, INGRESS, EGRESS, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED 11-20-1952 IN BOOK 1417, PAGE 264 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 50' WIDE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SCE FOR PUBLIC UTILITY, INGRESS, EGRESS, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED 12-09-1952 IN BOOK 1422, PAGE 444 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES, DITCHES, FLUMES, AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF FLOYD WATSON RALPH WATSON AND LEO WATSON RECORDED 10-22-1925 IN BOOK 652, PAGE 452 OF DEEDS. (NOT PLOTTABLE) EASEMENT FOR PIPES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSE IN FAVOR OF WATSON WATER COMPANY, RECORDED IN BOOK 129, PAGE 50 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (NOT PLOTTABLE) X
X

CALIFORNIA
74 Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 20

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
373 of 1244

MH
MH
MH
MH
U/O
U/O
U/OMH

CULTIVATED
FIELD
U/O
S
SUB
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
UB
UB
S
S
M
M
M
M
MH
U/O
MH
UB
M
M
U/O
U/O
S

DECKU/O
U/O
U/O

CULTIVATED
FIELD
M
ASPH
ASPH
ASPH
DIRT
DIRT
DIRT
DIRT
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC

CONC POOL
DIRT
DIRT
DIRT
CONC

CULTIVATED
FIELD
AT-107
1467.56
AT-115
1479.52
AT-116
1478.53
AT-117
1481.20
UB M
F/H
F/H
MH
U/O
ASPH
M
MH
F/H
UB
F/H
M
F/H
F/H
DIRT
U/O
CONC
DIRT
1470
1475
1480
1480
1485
1485 1490
1480
1475
1470
1470
1467.5 1468.7 1469.2 1469.9 1470.9 1472.7 1473.2 1473.6 1474.2 1476.2 1476.6 1476.9 1477.3 1478.1 1478.2 1477.9 1467.3 1467.9 1469.1 1469.6 1470.2 1470.8 1471.2 1471.8 1472.5 1473.5 1474.4 1474.9 1475.5 1476.8 1477.5 1477.8 1477.9 1478.2 1478.7 1478.9 1478.7 1478.6 1477.5 1467.5 1468.4 1469.7 1470.2 1470.8 1471.3 1471.9 1472.4 1472.9 1473.5 1473.9 1474.3 1474.9 1475.4 1476.5 1477.2 1478.2 1478.7 1479.3 1479.4 1479.2 1479.1 1478.8 1469.3 1470.5 1471.5 1472.0 1472.5 1473.1 1473.6 1474.2 1474.6 1475.1 1475.7 1476.3 1476.8 1477.5 1478.2 1478.8 1479.4 1479.6 1479.9 1480.1 1479.8 1479.5 1470.7 1470.4 1470.8 1471.5 1471.9 1472.5 1473.6 1474.1 1474.8 1475.2 1475.5 1475.9 1476.6 1477.5 1478.6 1479.3 1480.3 1480.7 1480.9 1480.9 1480.5 1479.9 1470.5 1471.2 1471.8 1472.6 1473.1 1473.8 1474.2 1474.9 1475.4 1476.4 1476.9 1477.4 1478.1 1478.5 1479.2 1479.8 1480.4 1480.7 1481.2 1481.4 1481.3 1481.1 1480.4 1470.2 1471.4 1472.0 1472.6 1473.3 1474.2 1474.7 1475.4 1475.9 1476.3 1476.9 1477.6 1478.9 1479.3 1479.9 1480.6 1481.5 1481.8 1481.8 1482.1 1481.5 1470.3 1471.2 1471.9 1472.1 1472.8 1473.5 1474.2 1475.1 1475.7 1476.6 1477.3 1477.8 1478.6 1479.3 1479.8 1480.2 1480.9 1481.5 1481.9 1482.2 1482.4 1482.6 1482.5 1482.3 1477.5 1478.3 1478.8 1479.6 1480.0 1480.5 1481.2 1481.7 1482.1 1482.7 1482.8 1483.0 1483.1 1483.0 1471.8 1477.5 1478.4 1479.0 1479.7 1480.3 1480.9 1481.5 1482.1 1482.6 1483.1 1483.4 1483.7 1483.8 1483.4 1472.4 1477.7 1478.4 1479.2 1480.1 1480.5 1481.1 1481.7 1482.3 1482.8 1483.3 1483.7 1484.1 1484.5 1484.3 1472.6 1478.1 1478.6 1479.3 1480.2 1480.6 1481.4 1481.9 1482.5 1483.6 1484.1 1484.5 1484.9 1484.8 1471.8 1474.6 1478.3 1479.5 1480.5 1481.5 1482.1 1482.7 1483.1 1483.8 1484.4 1484.8 1485.2 1485.3 1477.8 1478.7 1479.3 1480.6 1481.2 1481.8 1482.2 1482.9 1483.4 1483.9 1484.5 1484.9 1485.2 1485.7 1478.2 1479.2 1479.8 1480.5 1481.1 1481.2 1481.8 1482.4 1482.9 1483.5 1483.9 1484.6 1485.2 1485.8 1486.1 1479.8 1480.4 1480.9 1481.3 1481.9 1482.3 1482.7 1483.1 1483.6 1484.2 1484.8 1485.4 1486.5 1475.6 1480.3 1480.8 1481.4 1481.7 1482.3 1482.6 1483.1 1483.4 1483.9 1484.3 1485.7 1486.2 1486.7 1476.7 1480.7 1481.3 1481.9 1482.5 1482.9 1483.2 1483.4 1483.9 1484.5 1484.8 1485.5 1486.1 1486.6 1487.3 1481.1 1481.5 1482.3 1482.8 1483.2 1483.7 1483.9 1484.4 1484.9 1485.1 1485.6 1486.4 1487.3 1474.9 1476.2 1481.2 1481.8 1482.2 1483.5 1483.9 1484.2 1484.6 1484.9 1485.2 1485.5 1486.0 1486.5 1487.3 1488.1 1476.1 1476.1 1476.5 1477.6 1478.8 1479.3 1480.5 1482.2 1484.6 1485.1 1485.6 1485.9 1486.3 1486.8 1487.2 1487.8 1488.5 1475.7 1476.2 1477.8 1478.8 1479.3 1480.2 1480.8 1481.5 1485.5 1488.3 1488.9 1474.5 1476.2 1477.3 1477.7 1478.8 1480.3 1480.4 1480.7 1481.4 1483.3 1485.2 1485.5 1487.9 1488.5 1489.0 1489.2 1476.5 1478.5 1479.5 1481.7 1483.0 1485.6 1487.6 1487.6 1488.9 1489.1 1489.8 1472.6
1472.8
1469.1
1471.2
1471.2
1486.5
1486.4
1484.8
1484.1
1482.7
1482.51479.9
1479.9
1475.4
1474.1
1474.1
1474.31473.8
1473.8 1474.3
1476.2
1475.8
1472.5
1472.1
1471.6
1471.1 1470.5
1470.9
1471.4
1469.5
1468.7
1468.3
1467.9
1467.6
1467.3
1472.3
1472.8
1473.2
1473.6
1474.4
1474.1
1475.3
1476.6
1476.3
1476.5
1480.7
1480.2 1484.3
1483.4
1485.4 1486.4
1489.9
1486.8
1485.1
1486.9
1488.5
1487.5
1489.8
1479.41480.1
1480.2
1466.8
1467.1
1467.3 1468.3
1467.5
1468.6
1471.4
1472.4
1473.7
1474.4
1475.7
1476.4
1477.6
1479.5
1468.7
1469.4
1468.5
1467.8
1468.5
1470.7
1469.3
1470.7
1471.4
1471.7
1472.2
1472.7
1472.3
1471.6
1471.8
1471.6
1470.2
1470.5
1472.9
1472.5
1475.7
1474.5 1474.6
1474.3
1473.7
1471.6
1470.9
1469.8
1468.8
1468.5
1466.8
1466.7
1473.4
1478.4
1475.4
1474.7
1475.8
1476.61475.11474.9

0.0 1472.7
1478.6 1480.7 1482.5
1480.5
1478.3
1479.1
1478.4
1480.41476.5
1475.9
1481.1
1483.2
1485.3
1483.3
1484.9
1486.2
1486.31485.6 1489.5 1489.5
1488.1
1476.3
1479.3
1479.8
1476.2 1476.7 1477.1
1477.21476.61475.91475.2
1475.8
1475.2 1475.8 1476.4
1477.4
1477.7
1477.8
1477.9
1477.5
1477.5
1474.7
1474.2
1473.8
1473.3
1473.41472.61472.51471.6
1472.1
1472.6
1472.1
1472.8
1474.6
1475.5
1476.6
1474.7
1480.3
1480.5
1479.6
1478.4
1480.7
1480.3
1474.9
1474.5
1475.8
1475.5 1475.5
1477.4
1479.6
1480.11477.5
1476.5
1476.4
1475.7
1475.2
1480.4
1478.4
1478.2
1479.5
1482.1 1481.7
1481.4
1477.5
1476.9
1480.7
1477.2
1477.5
1476.5
1476.7
1478.3
1482.5
1478.8
1479.2
1478.4
1482.8
1479.6
1479.3
1480.41479.6
1479.6
1481.5
1481.5
1477.41476.7
1476.4
1479.9
1479.3
1480.4
1480.4
1479.9
1482.3
1481.5
1482.5
1480.7
1481.3
1479.3
1477.0
1474.5
1476.5
1475.4
1479.4
1478.5
1479.4
1476.71476.01475.3
1475.5
1474.6
1476.4
1480.7
1480.8
1480.31480.61481.1
1482.3
1480.71480.7
1480.9
1479.4
1478.6
1479.4
1478.5
1480.9
1484.4
1483.9
1480.7
1482.8
1482.3
1479.7
1478.5
1480.6
1479.5
1483.7
1483.6
1483.5
1484.3
1480.6
1480.2
1479.9
1479.4
1479.8
1479.21478.7
1478.8
1478.6
1478.1
1476.5
1481.8
1483.4
1483.9
1482.9
1483.9
1482.4
1482.4
1482.5
1482.3
1480.1
1482.9
1483.1
1479.3
1481.3
1480.7
1481.4
1482.8
1478.5
1479.3
1478.3
1479.8
1479.1
1480.1
1480.5
1480.8
1480.2
1483.5
1483.2
1484.7
1483.8
1480.5
1483.3
1476.4
1479.4

DIRT PILES
LOT 15
LOT 12
LOT 10
LOT 1 LOT 2 LOT 3
LOT 7
LOT 8
LOT 18
LOT 19

GALA CIRCLE

CINNAMONCREEK CIR
P=1475.8
P=1476.1
P=1476.4
P=1476.7
P=1476.9
P=1477.3
P=1477.0
P=1476.9
P=1479.7
P=1480.0 P=1481.0 P=1481.9 P=1482.5 P=1483.1
P=1481.6P=1481.0
P=1482.1 P=1482.6
P=1481.2
P=1478.7
P=1478.3
P=1478.3
P=1478.7
P=1475.8
P=1476.4
P=1479.0
P=1479.3
P=1480.3 P=1480.7
P=1483.5P=1483.0
P=1482.5 P=1482.9
P=1483.6 P=1485.3 P=1485.9
P=1484.3 P=1484.7
P=1484.5P=1484.0 P=1485.2P=1485.0
P=1485.8P=1485.6
P=1486.2 P=1486.4
P=1486.5
P=1486.6
P=1486.4
P=1486.1
P=1485.8
P=1485.6
P=1485.3
P=1485.0
P=1484.7
P=1484.4
P=1484.1
P=1483.8
P=1483.2
P=1482.6
P=1482.2
P=1482.2P=1481.5P=1480.9P=1480.4P=1479.8P=1479.1P=1478.7P=1478.2 P=1477.8
P=1477.4P=1477.0P=1476.6
P=1476.2
P=1475.8
P=1475.4P=1474.9
P=1475.1
P=1475.5 P=1475.9 P=1476.3 P=1476.7
P=1477.1 P=1477.5 P=1477.3 P=1478.4 P=1478.7 P=1479.4 P=1479.9 P=1480.4 P=1481.0
P=1483.5P=1483.2P=1482.5P=1481.9P=1481.2P=1480.5P=1480.0P=1479.6P=1479.3P=1478.8P=1478.4P=1478.0P=1477.6 P=1475.6
P=1474.2
P=1474.6
P=1475.0
P=1475.4P=1473.7
P=1473.4
P=1472.8
P=1473.0
P=1473.4
P=1473.7
P=1474.3
P=1474.6
P=1474.8 P=1474.8
P=1477.0
P=1477.0 P=1480.2
P=1479.7
P=1481.5 P=1482.0 P=1482.5 P=1483.0 P=1483.5 P=1484.0 P=1484.5 P=1485.0 P=1485.3 P=1483.7
P=1483.2P=1482.5P=1481.9P=1481.2P=1480.5P=1480.0P=1479.6 P=1479.4P=1479.2P=1476.5
P=1476.6
P=1474.3
P=1474.0
LOT 13
LOT 14
LOT 16
LOT 17
(MB 386/31-33)
LOT 11
LOT 4 LOT 5 LOT 6
LOT 9
LOT 17
ZONE (SP)GP-SP329-110-043
TTM 34118
VACANT

RCFC&WCD R/W
1479.5
FS

1.0%

1.2%

1.4%

0.8% 1.3%

0.85%

1.2% 1.9%
GB
1483.4 FS

0.6%
1478.4
FS/GB

0.9%

0.8%

0.8%

0.6%

0.6%

0.6%

0.73%%%

0.60%%%

1.10%%%

0.60%%%
\A1;56'\A1;28' \A1;28'
\A1;56'\A1;28'\A1;28'
\A1;56'\A1;28' \A1;28'
\A1;56'\A1;28'\A1;28'
\A1;56'\A1;28'\A1;28'
\A1;56'\A1;28'\A1;28'
\A1;56'\A1;28'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;28'
\A1;56'\A1;28'\A1;28'
\A1;56'\A1;28' \A1;28'
\A1;56'\A1;28'\A1;28'
\A1;56'
\A1;88'
\A1;57'\A1;37' \A1;20'
\A1;57'\A1;37'\A1;20'
\A1;151.69'
\A1;26'
\A1;108.55'
\A1;72.41'
1471
1469
1467
1470
1468
1466
1472
\A1;15'\A1;22'\A1;12'
\A1;8'
\A1;5'
\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;16'
\A1;10'
\A1;10'
\A1;10'
\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;12'\A1;32' \A1;32'\A1;12'\A1;22'
\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;18'\A1;10' \A1;18'
\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;18'\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;5' \A1;15'\A1;22'\A1;12'
\A1;8'
\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
\A1;10'
\A1;46'
\A1;32'\A1;12'\A1;32'\A1;12'\A1;22'
\A1;88'
329-090-022
VACANT
GP-PUC

ZONING-PUC
329-090-022
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP
329-090-020
VACANT
329-090-019
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP
329-090-021
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP
329-100-033
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP (VHDR)
329-100-031
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP (VHDR)
329-090-069
VACANT
GP-SP

ZONING-SP (VHDR)
SP

ZONING (R-R)
GP-RR1
329-100-023
SP

ZONING (R-R)
GP-RR1
329-100-015
SP

ZONING (R-R)
GP-RR1
329-100-016
SP

ZONING (R-R)
GP-RR1
329-100-017
SP

ZONING (R-R)
GP-RR1
329-100-018
SP

ZONING (R-R)
GP-RR1
329-100-019
SP

ZONING (R-R)
GP-RR1
329-100-020
SP

ZONING (R-R)
GP-RR1
329-100-022
\A1;26'
105
106
104
90 91
92949596979899
100
101
102
103
8985 86 87 8884
78 80
76 77
81 82 83
139
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
126
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138 116117
119
120
121
122
123
125
107
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
72 73
74 TOT LOT
165
166
167
168
164
70 71
153
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
68 69
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 48
4142
43 44
45 46
47 40
32 3334
35 36
37 38
39 31
28 29
30 27 171920212223242526 18
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
173 L.&S.

LOT 171
176 L.&S.
174 L.&S.
185 L.&S.
184 L.&S.
175 L.&S.
181 L.&S.
180 L.&S.
(MB 334/87-90)
186 L.&S.

67.67' 9.01'

9.01'

42.00'

26.87'

90.43'

48.20'

48.20'

90.43'

48.20'

90.43'

48.20'
176 L.&S.

90.43'

48.20'

48.20'

90.43'

48.20'

48.20'

90.43'

48.20'

48.20'

90.43'

48.50'

48.50'

48.50'

90.43'

48.50'

90.43'

48.50'

34.87'
L=22.09'

93.15'

54.73'

27.41'

95.91'

48.58'

48.50'

98.67'

48.58'

48.50'

19.13'
L=23.23'

97.23'

48.58'

34.39'

6.60'

90.21'

48.58'
L=15.18'
131.12'
113.82'
=
4 2
.
6 6
'
=
5 .
1 4
'

95.60'
87 128.25'

40.52'

40.99'
L=24.54'

96.80'
101.69'
L=1.72'
L=21.51'

48.16'
104.00'

69.50'
104.00'

69.50'

69.50'
P=1484.8
104.00'

69.50'

69.50'
P=1484.2

69.50'
104.00'

69.50'

69.50'
104.00'

69.50'

69.50'
104.00'

69.50'

69.50'
104.00'

69.50'
\A1;56'

10.74'
L=23.23'

39.03'

98.85'

70.00'

14.76'

78.35'

30.25'
= 3 6 . 5 1
'

96.91'

65.76'

56.34'

91.90'
=
40 .
5 '

92.51' =
4 2
.
09 '

55.78'

28.61'
L=6.39'

40.99'103.22'

48.00'
L=21.34'
105.17'

26.82'

48.00'
P=1477.9
=
3 3
.
4 4
'

14.27'

93.48'

70.38'

90.96'
=
4 0
.
6 '

7.43'

48.00'

9.90'

11.31'

40.00'

48.00'

82.96'

11.31'

9.90'
P=1475.4

87.04'

40.00'

95.04'

95.04'

48.00'
P=1476.1

95.04'
100.76'

48.00' 48.00'

22.38'

26.26'
P=1476.7
P=1478.0

25.57'
L=22.62'

49.18'
108.90'

49.16'

98.17'
L=25.54'27.20'
110.89'
162.90'10.76'
=
2 8
.
6 9
'

22.80'

10.55'135.07'

11.05'

67.56'

92.00'
P=1475.4

92.00'

92.00'

52.60'

52.60'52.60'

52.60'

92.00'

92.00'

52.60'

52.60'

52.60'

52.60'

92.00'

52.60'

52.60'47.00'

77.00'

48.00'

11.31'

9.90'

48.00'

84.00'

40.00'

92.00'

9.90'

11.31'

48.00'

92.00'

48.00'
P=1474.0

48.00'

92.00'

48.00'48.00'

92.00'

48.00'
L=3.76'

44.24'

91.98'

48.00'49.50'

80.61'

26.23'
L=24.71'

78.04'

23.77'

94.46'

84.04'
156.99'
462.75'
237.85'

11.51' 144.85'
=
.
6 '

48.31'

93.00'
P=1473.0

48.06'
L=23.41'

90.00'

25.88'

95.77'
P=1474.6
\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'
1484.0
FS/GB

1.0%
1484.9
HP/GB

0.6%
1484.50
TC
1484.0
FS
1483.70
FS
1483.0
FS
1482.20 FS
1482.0
FS/GB

1.2%
1481.0
FS
1480.0
FS
1481.03 FS
1481.5
FS
1480.1
FS/GB
1479.0
FS
\A1;10'

93.95'

24.12'
L=25.24'

48.00'
L=3.23'44.77'

48.00'

94.00'

48.00'

48.00'

94.00'

94.00'

48.00'

48.00'

48.00'

48.00'

94.00'

9.15'

12.06'

85.47'

39.47'

48.00'

83.47' 9.15'

12.06'

92.00'

39.47'
P=1476.2

48.00'

92.00'

92.00'

48.00'
P=1475.8

92.00'

48.00'

94.93'

4.28'
=
4 3
.
8 5
'
L=8.66'

39.95'

90.00'

97.64'

90.00'

90.24'

15.01'

10.05'
L=17.21'

30.94'

14.16'

7.07'

48.00'

37.98'

87.98'

98.00'
P=1476.7

98.00'

98.00'

48.00'

48.00'
P=1477.9

48.00'

48.00'

48.00'

48.00'

98.00'

98.00'

48.00'

48.00'

8.34'
100.38'

48.30'
=
3 9
.
8 0
'
L=21.65'

49.68'

95.68'

27.40'

80.53'

7.41'

71.74'

90.00'

90.00'

37.34'

49.00'

49.00' 49.00'

49.00'

90.00'

49.00'

90.00'

49.00'
P=1482.0

90.00'

91.03'

92.00'

23.26'

24.75'

24.27'

49.00' 25.76'

49.00' 49.00' 49.00'

49.00'
P=1483.3 P=1483.8

92.00'

92.00'

49.00' 49.00'

92.00'

92.00'

49.00' 49.00' 64.69'

92.00'

30.27'

4.33'

39.84'49.00'49.00'49.00'49.00' 49.00'
P=1481.6P=1481.3
P=1480.9
P=1480.7

94.34'17.68'

4.13'

47.41'48.01'48.01'48.01'48.01'48.01'48.01'48.02'48.01'80.26'75.47'

45.04'

52.94'39.30'56.70'
106.34'
105.63'
104.92'
104.21'
103.51'
102.80'
102.09'
100.37'

88.99'
103.85'
120.26'

91.22'

96.91'
104.16'
104.23'

94.30'

7.07'

14.14'

1.43'L=9.64'

5.98'

40.63'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'
L=23.22'

23.59'

39.56'
= 3 .
2 4
'
=
35 .
46 '
=
3 5
.
3 0
'
=
2 4
.
8 4
'

21.46'

19.53'
L=23.23'

48.00'38.00'

72.00'

9.90'25.46'

32.65' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 40.71' 156.00'

82.21'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

11.01'

10.20'
182 L.&S.
183 L.&S.

50.65' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.50'48.00'

88.00'

21.21'

9.90'

11.31'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

88.21'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

40.71'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'42.65'

21.21'

11.01'

10.20'
L=23.25'

61.25' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 40.50'

11.31'

9.90'

82.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

96.17'

48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.00' 48.50'

89.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

97.50'

9.90'

11.31'

40.50'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'48.00'30.36'

76.12'

7.71'

24.74'
P=1482.8
169
329-100-033 VACANT

GP-SP ZONING-SP (VHDR)
L=14.65'

34.93' 6.06'
= 2 3 .
2 3
'

20.58'
828.12'

48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 48.51' 52.01'

84.50'

9.01'

9.01'

92.95'

93.76'

94.57'

95.38'

96.20'

97.01'

97.82'

98.63'

99.44'
100.25'
101.06'
101.87'
102.68'
103.49'
104.30'
101.03'

91.94'
E
E
D2
D2
D1
D1
AA
BB
C C
F
F
F
F

CIDER STREET

48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 48.50' 47.00' 1478.0
FS
1477.0
FS
1476.8
FS/GB
1475.0
FS
1474.0
FS
1473.0
FS/GB

1.0%
1472.3
FS/LP1.0%
1473.0
FS/GB
1474.00 FS0.8%
1475.0
FS
1475.53 FS
1475.5
FS
1474.0
FS

1.2%
1473.5
FS/GB
1473.0
FS
\A1;28'\A1;28'
1472.0
FS/GB
1480.0
FS
1481.0
FS
1482.0
FS
1483.0
FS

1.0%

0.6%
1478.6
FS
1478.0
FS
1477.5
FS/GB

1.0%
1476.95 FS
1482.0
FS
1481.0
FS
1480.0
FS
1479.0
FS
1478.5
FS/GB
1478.0
FS
1477.0 FS
1474.7
FS/GB
1476.0
PVI
1471.5
FS/GB
1473.0
FS
1472.5
FS
1472.0
FS
1476.30 FS
1475.0
FS/GB
1474.0
FS
1477.6
FS/GB
1477.2
FS
1476.0
FS
1483.0
FS
1482.0
FS
1481.0
FS
1480.0
FS
1479.0
FS

0.9%

1.0%

E STREET

D STREET

F STREET

G STREET
=
1 .
0 0
'
=
6 4
.
5 9
'
\A1;10'
1471.0
FS
1470.0
FS
1469.0
FS
1473.0
FS

PALOMAR ROAD
1474.0
FS
1475.0
FS
1473.40
FS
186'
365.28'

B STREET
1471.0
FS
142.03'
160.43'
243.50' 214.37'
249.33'
242'
L=6.49'
157.85'
708.50'

90.43'

C STREET
258.35'
504.73'
1482.0
FS
1484.0
FS

JUNIPERO
ROAD
1485.0
FS
1486.0
FS
1487.0
FS

RED APPLE ROAD

WATER QUALITY BASIN
156.01'
417.34'

0.73%%%351.75'
LOT 187
154
140
127
118
108
93 79

GRADE BREAK

2.0%
=
3 .
8 9
'
\A1;30'

34.85'
1472.0 FS
N89%%D19'52"W
\A1;56'
A ST
B ST
=
6 .
8 '
Δ
=
1 2
5 6
' 4
4 "
R
=
3 0
0 .
0 0
'
=
4 0
.
2 3
'

21.33'
N08%%D30'14"W

32.45'
1481.60
TC/HP
N89%%D24'46"W
841.96'
N89%%D24'46"W
505.36'
N89%%D24'46"W
157.50'

21.21'

21.21'

70.43'

21.21'

77.00'

18.03'
1476.0
FS

21.23'
172.28'

21.21'
146.00'

35.36'

21.81'

21.21'

34.61'
159.49'

73.13'

30.83'

21.21'
156.00'
156.00'

21.21'

86.00'

86.00'

19.85'

19.85'

21.21'

21.21'

21.21'

21.21'
533.25'
2:1 MAX
388.20'
2:1 MAX

C STREET
N89%%D44'31"E
N89%%D24'46"W
H ST

26.60'

18.03'
174 L.&S.
177 L.&S.
178 L.&S.
179 L.&S.
=
9 9
.
5 0
'

11.31'

91.29'

90.00'

66.29'

71.17'

41.49'
75 P=1477.4
124
\A1;30'\A1;20'
R/W
{\LSECTION B-B}
\A1;37'\A1;22'

NTS
PAD
\A1;15'
5' LANDSCAPE & SLOPE
LOT 176
PROP.
\A1;5'
\A1;6'
\A1;S/W
\A1;5'

JUNIPERO ROAD
\A1;RESIDENTIAL LOT

2.0%%%2.0%%%
R/W
{\LSECTION C-C}
\A1;37'\A1;22'

NTS
PAD
\A1;15'
5' LANDSCAPE & SLOPE
LOTS 175 & 176
PROP.
\A1;6'
\A1;S/W
\A1;5'

JUNIPERO ROAD
\A1;RESIDENTIAL LOT

2.0%%%2.0%%%
PAD
{\LSECTION D1-D1}
NTS
\A1;WATER QUALITY BASIN
15' PAVED ACCESS
ROAD
26' EASEMENT FOR

STORM DRAIN PURPOSES BOUNDARY
TRACT
\A1;RESIDENTIAL LOT

\A1;VARIES
\A1;10' \A1;16'

2.0%%%

BASIN BOTTOM
(PER PLAN)
\A1;26' EMWD SEWER EASEMENT

2.0%%%
\A1;PAVED ACCESS ROAD
VARIES
\A1;2'
\A1;VARIES
LOT 171
\A1;10' \A1;22'
\A1;6'
\A1;32' \A1;12'
\A1;25'
\A1;35'
\A1;25'
\A1;22'
PAD
\A1;VARIES
\A1;(2'-5')
\A1;2'

RESIDENTAIL LOT
{\LSECTION A-A}
NTS
\A1;3'\A1;12' \A1;20'

PALOMAR ROAD

\A1;10'
\A1;6'
\A1;EXISTING 50' WIDE SCE EASEMENT
\A1;6'

2.0%%%

2.0%%%
PROP.

R/W
*
*
{\LSECTION E-E}
NTS

BOUNDARY
TRACT
PAD
(VARIES)

2.4'
MAX
\A1;5'
\A1;LANDSCAPE
5'

DRAINAGE
DITCH

P/L BOUNDARY
TRACT
PAD
{\LSECTION F-F}
NTS
10:1 MAX
\A1;PROPOSED
\A1;RESIDENTIAL
\A1;EXISTING RESIDENTIAL

LANDSCAPE &

SLOPE W/

DRAINAGE
LOT 172
10'
*
*
PAD
{\LSECTION D2-D2}
NTS
\A1;WATER QUALITY BASIN
15' PAVED ACCESS
ROAD
26' EASEMENT FOR

STORM DRAIN PURPOSES

BOUNDARY
TRACT
\A1;RESIDENTIAL LOT

\A1;VARIES
\A1;10' \A1;16'

2.0%%%

BASIN BOTTOM
(PER PLAN)
\A1;26' EMWD SEWER EASEMENT

2.0%%%
\A1;PAVED ACCESS ROAD
\A1;2'
LOT 171

2.4'
MAX
1471.2 1471.8
\A1;30'
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38132

CITY OF MENIFEE
LOTS 43, 44, 53, 54, 59 AND 60 OF ROMOLA FARMS IN THE CITY OF MENIFEE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0 SCALE: 1"=60'
60 120 180 240
2 2
NO. 38132
{\LLEGEND}

TRACT BOUNDARY
PROP. R/W DEDICATION

LOT NUMBER

EXISTING CONTOUR

PROPOSED PARCEL

EXISTING EASEMENT
LOT 1

EXISTING POWER POLE

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN

EXISTING STORM DRAIN

PROPOSED CONTOUR
SCHEDULE "A"

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP

CITY OF MENIFEE
SHEET

OF SHEET
DWG. NO. ____
KO
BB/BM
Checked By:

Scale: AS SHOWN
Drawn By:

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION APDDATE
REV Engineering, Inc.
357 N. SHERIDAN STREET

ENGINEERINGSURVEYING
SUITE 117
CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92880
TEL. (951) 279-1800
FAX (951) 279-4380
Drawing: R:\\280967\\PA 9 - TTM 38132\\Preliminary\\TTM 38132\\967 - TTM 38132 - 002.dwg Layout: 30x42 L Saved: 1/29/2024 8:30 AM Plotted: 1/29/2024 8:32 AM Plot Scale: 1:2.93 By: Beverly Marinas

RETAINING WALL
{\LNOTES}: FOR EXISTING EASEMENTS SEE SHEET 1

PROPOSED SEWER

PROPOSED WATER
\A1;30'
{\LDETAIL "A"}
SCALE: 1"=20'
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 21

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
374 of 1244

PA 9
TTM 38132

NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
PLN21-0275 06-01-2022
CLIENT:

RICHLAND COMMUNITIES

BRIAN HARDY
[email protected]
949.698.2191
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:

BRIGHTVIEW DESIGN GROUP

WADE GANES
[email protected]
949.238.4900
SHEET INDEX:

TITLE SHEET

REGIONAL AMENITY MAP

OVERALL MAP

PARK ENLARGEMENT

PARKWAY & SLOPE ENLARGEMENT

PLANT PALETTE

ENTRY MONUMENTATION

PARK MONUMENTATION

WALL AND FENCE PLAN

WALL AND FENCE DETAILS

MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT
1 2
3 4
5 11
12 13
14 15
16 TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA: 29.4 AC LANDSCAPE AREA: 3.1 AC LANDSCAPE % 10.5% TOTAL CFD MAINTAINED AREA/ OFF-SITE: 14,095 SQ FT TOTAL HOA MAINTAIN AREA / ON-SITE: 120,581 SQ FT TOTAL PRIVATE MAINTAINED AREA: 837,036 SQ FT REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES PER ACRE: 60 PER AC TOTAL TREES PROVIDED: 148 TOTAL STREET TREES REQUIRED (1 PER 30 LF): 29 TOTAL STREET TREES PROVIDED: 29 TOTAL SLOPE LANDSCAPE AREA: 40,953 SQ FT TOTAL SLOPE TREES REQUIRED (1 TREE PER 750 SF): 54 TOTAL SLOPE TREES PROVIDED: 70 TOTAL SHRUBS REQUIRED (1 SHRUB PER 100 SF): 1,132 TOTAL SHRUBS PROVIDED: 1,132 TURF %: .9% 1 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
09/28/2023

HARVEST GLEN

MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 22

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
375 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132

REGIONAL AMENITY MAP

15 M
ILE R / 20 MINUTE DRIVE
SITE

SANTIAGO
PEAK

TRABUCO
PEAK

ELSINORE

MOUNTAINS

LAKE MATHEWS
MT. RESERVE
LAKE

MATHEWS
PERRIS

RESERVOIR

DIAMOND

VALLEY LAKE

BLACK MOUNTAIN SKINNER

RESERVOIR

SYCAMORE CANYON

WILDERNESS PARK

SAN BERNARDINO NA -

TIONAL FOREST

MT SAN JACINTO STATE
PARK

MICA BUTTE

LAKE VIEW MOUN-
TAINS

SAN JACINTO
DOUBLE

BUTTE WEST
DOUBLE

BUTTE EAST
5 M
ILE R / 10 MINUTE DRIVE
10 M
ILE R / 15 MINUTE DRIVE
TRES

CERRITOS WEST

PERRIS STATE REC -

REATION AREA

SAN JACINTO

MOUNTAINS
LAKE

ELSINORE
KEY
Water Body
Peaks
Park
Amenity

LOS PINOS
PEAK

MENIFEE
NTS
STEELE
PEAK

ESTELLE

MOUNTAIN

MONUMENT

PEAK GAVILAN
PEAK
09/28/2023
2 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

REGIONAL AMENITY MAP
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 23

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
376 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132

A) INDUSTRIAL

B) NEIGHBORHOOD
C) HIGHWAY 74

HERITAGE HIGH SCHOOL
• Track Field
• Football Stadium
• Base Ball Diamonds
• Tennis
• Playground
• Baseball Diamond
• Pavilions
• Indoor Gymnasium
• Indoor Classroom
HWY 74

BRIGGS RD

ROMOLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY

HARVEST VALLEY ELEMENTARY
MARION V. ASHLEY

COMMUNITY CENTER

WATSON RD
Regional Bike
Trail
Bike Lane
Highway
KEY

MENIFEE RD

PALOMAR RD

VICINITY MAP
PA 9
The site is located north of Highway 74 and is adjacent to industrial zoning and future communities. The regional bike trail passes by the western edge of the site along Palomar Road promoting alternative connection through the city. The surrounding influences are varied and create an opportunity for Harvest Glen to be a beacon of progressive design for a planned community. This can be achieved through water-wise and site appropriate plant selection and unified design story from green space to living space. Just south of the site is industrial zoned land (Image A), adjacent master plan community (Image B), mixed California adaptive planting around Highway 74 (Image C).

NTS
09/28/2023
3 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 24

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
377 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132

D STREET

E STREET

F STREET

G STREET

A STREET

C STREET

H STREET

I STREET

JUNIPERO ROAD

B STREETB STREET

PALOMAR STREET
180’
120’
60’
0’
N
1 LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT
NOTE:
2 FRONT YARD TREES AND 1 STREET TREE TO BE PROVIDED PER LOT, AS WELL AS 1 TREE PER 750 SQ FT AND 1 SHRUB PER 100 SQ FT FOR ALL REAR SLOPES 09/28/2023
4 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
LEGEND
BASIN
ENTR Y MONUMENTATION (See sheet 12)

TOT LOT

PROPER TY LINE

LIMIT OF W ORK

SEWER LINE

S TORM DRAINS

W ATER LINE

LIGHT POLES

FIRE HYDRANT
1 2
3 2
2 3

PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
Surrounded by beautiful lakes and mountain
ranges, Harvest Glen is an intimate single
family residential community located along
Palomer Street in the city of Menifee,
California. Large landscape backdrops
along the street provides an inviting entry
experience with large canopy trees defining
Street A and the main community loop.

The secondary streets include smaller trees
that help establish a hierarchy of circulation
through the community.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 25

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
378 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132
180’
120’
60’
0’
N
NOTE:

1. 2 FRONT YARD TREES AND 1 STREET TREE TO BE PROVIDED PER LOT, AS WELL AS 1 TREE PER 750 SQUARE FEET FOR ALL REAR SLOPES

2. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES APPROPRIATE TO

LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

3. REFER TO TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 11.

D STREET

E STREET

F STREET

G STREET

A STREET

C STREET

H STREET

I STREET

JUNIPERO ROAD

B STREETB STREET

PALOMAR STREET

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT

LINE OF SIGHT
09/28/2023
5 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

BACKBONE STREET TREE - PALOMAR STREET

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

BACKBONE STREET TREE JUNIPERO STREET
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE MYRTLE
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE

INTERIOR STREET TREES

A S T - PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

C ST - KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA- GOLDEN RAIN TREE
F ST - LAGERSTROEMIA ‘NATCHEZ’ - WHITE FLOWERING CREPE MYRTLE G ST - CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE

H ST - GEIJERA PARVIFLORA - AUSTRALIAN WILLOW

I ST - PODOCARPUS GRACILOR - YEW PINE

PARK TREES
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE MYRTLE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘NANCHEZ’ - WHITE FLOWERING CREPE MYRTLE
PINUS BRUTIA SSP. ELDARICA - AFRICAN PINE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK

QUERCUS DOUGLASSII - BLUE OAK

BASIN TREES

GEIJERA PARVIFLORA - AUSTRALIAN WILLOW

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

PARKWAY PLANTING

PARK/OPEN SPACE PLANTING

BASIN PLANTING

HOMEOWNER BACKYARD SLOPE PLANTING
LEGEND

PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 26

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
379 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132
16’0’

NC STREET
The neighborhood park provides a range of plan and
gathering opportunities for residents. The play area
caters to children of all ages. The picnic court provides shade and an intimate space for birthday parties and
play dates to occur. The flexible lawn provides a space to throw a ball or frisbee and functions as a spill over space for the tot lot.

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Park Monumentation (See sheet 13)
Fle xible Lawn (1180 SF)
Enhanc ed Shrub Planting
2-5 T ot Lot (Resilient surfacing) - Pervious
5- 12 Tot Lot (Resilient surfacing) - Pervious
Picnic C ourt (Natural gray concrete)
BBQ
T rash and Recycling Bins
Gr ay Metal Bike racks on Gray DG
W alk - (Natural gray concrete) - Impervious
Drinking F ountain
Gr ay Metal Shade Structure
Cable Rail F ence (See sheet 14 & 15)
CMU C ommunity Wall (See sheet 14 & 15)
Gate
HO A Parkway Planting & HOA Slope Planting
(See Sheet 10)
C ompanion Bench Seating
Pilaster

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
2 3
1 5
17 6
4 7
8 9
10 11
12 15
15 18
16 KEY MAP

PALOMAR ROAD

JUNIPERO ROAD

B STREET B STREET

C STREET

I STREET

D STREET

E STREET

F STREET

G STREET
NTS
13 14

PARK TREES
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM

PALO VERDE

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS -DESERT WILLOW

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE
MYRTLE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘NANCHEZ’ - WHITE FLOWERING

CREPE MYRTLE
PINUS BRUTIA SSP. ELDARICA - AFRICAN PINE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA- COAST LIVE OAK

QUERCUS DOUGLASSII - BLUE OAK

PARK - SHRUBS
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

ALOE CAMPERI - POPCORN ALOE

ALOE DAWEI - ORANGE FLAME ALOE

BACCHARIS PILULARIS - COYOTE BUSH
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE

AMBITION GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
ROSEMARY ‘ TUSCAN BLUE’ - ROSEMARY

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE

DODONEA VISCOSA - HOPSEED BUSH
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING

SUNSET LANTANA
LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND

LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S

HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE

MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN
DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE

SENECIO VITALIS - NARROW - LEAF CHALKSTICKS

TEUCRIUM X LUCIDRYS - WALL GERMANDER

PARK - SCREENING PLANTING

DODONEA VISCOSA - HOPSEED BUSH

LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS - TEXAS RANGER
ROSEMARY ‘ TUSCAN BLUE’ - ROSEMARY

PARK - TURF

SEASHORE PASPALUM
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT

SPECIES APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE

INCORPORATED AT TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN

CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER
USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 11.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS

DOES NOT REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN

CHECK FOR APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH

OF PROPOSED PLANTERS AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE

ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT WITHIN AND

ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

PLANTING LEGEND
1’=3/16”
09/28/2023
6 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 27

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
380 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132

CFD- JUNIPERO ROAD - PARKWAY AND SLOPE PLANTING

TYPOLOGY
30’
20’
10’
0’
N
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"
PROJECT: 1730882
DATE: APRIL 21, 2022

HARVEST GLEN
NTS

KEY MAP
JUNIPERO RD.

G STREET

CFD PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA SLOPE - GROUND COVER
ACACIA REDOLENS ‘DESERT CARPET ACACIA

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

HOA SLOPE - SHRUB
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT
ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’ -
MANZANITA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE AMBITION GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE
TREE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE MYRTLE
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE
VINE

FICUS PUMILA - CREEPING FIG
LONICERA J. HALLIANA - JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE
MACFADYA UNGUIS CATII - CAT’S CLAW VINE
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES

APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT

TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 11.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT

REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS

AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT

WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Side walk (Concrete) - Impervious
S treet light
Splitw all Block Wall (See sheet 16)
Entry Monumenta tion (See sheet 9)
ROW
Mo w Curb
Pr operty Line
Pilaster
1 1
2 2
6 8
3 3
4 4
5 6
7 8
7 5

PLANTING LEGEND

RESIDENTIAL LOT
09/28/2023
7 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 28

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
381 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132

HOA BASIN - SLOPE PLANTING TYPOLOGY
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"
PROJECT: 1730882
DATE: APRIL 21, 2022

HARVEST GLEN
NTS

KEY MAP
90’
60’
30’
0’
N
B
STREET

G STREET

C STREET

HOA PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA BASIN UPLAND SHRUBS
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT

BACCHARIS PILULARIS - COYOTE BUSH

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

SENECIO VITALIS - NARROW-LEAF CHALK STICKS

TEUCRIUM X LUCIDRYS - WALL GERMANDER

HOA SLOPE - SHRUB
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT
ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’ -
MANZANITA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE AMBITION GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE

HOA SLOPE - SCREENING PLANTING

BACCHARIS PILULARIS - COYOTE BUSH

CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA - BAJA FAIRY DUSTER

DODONEA VISCOSA - HOPSEED BUSH

HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA - TOYON

LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS - TEXAS RANGER
ROSEMARY ‘ TUSCAN BLUE’ - ROSEMARY

BASIN (BOTH BOTTOM AND SLOPES)
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE
TREE

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS -DESERT WILLOW

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE
VINE

FICUS PUMILA - CREEPING FIG
LONICERA J. HALLIANA - JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE
MACFADYA UNGUIS CATII - CAT’S CLAW VINE
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES

APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT

TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 11.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT

REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS

AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT

WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

PLANTING LEGEND

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Side walk (Concrete) - Impervious
S treet light
Basin
Basin F ence and Gate (See sheet 14 & 15)
Basin A ccess Ramp (Concrete)
Basin A ccess Road (Concrete)
ROW
Pr operty Line
Pilaster
1 2
2 3
3 4
4 5
5 6
7 8
9 8
7 9
6 RESIDENTIAL LOT
09/28/2023
8 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 29

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
382 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132
30’
20’
10’
0’
N
HOA ENTRY AT ‘A’ STREET - PARKWAY AND SLOPE PLANTING

TYPOLOGY
‘A’ STREET

SIGHT LINE

PALOMAR STREET
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"
PROJECT: 1730882
DATE: APRIL 21, 2022

HARVEST GLEN
NTS

KEY MAP

CFD PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA SLOPE - GROUND COVER
ACACIA REDOLENS ‘DESERT CARPET ACACIA

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

HOA SLOPE - SHRUB
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT
ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’ -
MANZANITA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE AMBITION GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE

HOA SLOPE - SCREENING PLANTING

BACCHARIS PILULARIS - COYOTE BUSH

CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA - BAJA FAIRY DUSTER

DODONEA VISCOSA - HOPSEED BUSH

HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA - TOYON

LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS - TEXAS RANGER
ROSEMARY ‘ TUSCAN BLUE’ - ROSEMARY
TREE

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE
VINE

FICUS PUMILA - CREEPING FIG
LONICERA J. HALLIANA - JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE
MACFADYA UNGUIS CATII - CAT’S CLAW VINE
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES

APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT

TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 11.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT

REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS

AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT

WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Side walk (Concrete) - Impervious
S treet light
Splitw all Block Wall (See sheet 14 & 15)
Entry Monumenta tion (See sheet 12)
ROW
Mo w Curb
Pr operty Line
Pilaster
1 1
8 2
2 3
3 4
5 6
7 8
7 6
5 4

PLANTING PALETTE

RESIDENTIAL LOT
09/28/2023
9 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 30

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
383 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Side walk (Concrete) - Impervious
S treet light
Splitw all Block Wall (See sheet 14 & 15)
L ow tube Steel/Wrought Iron Fence and Gate (See sheet 14 & 15) ROW
Pilaster
30’
20’
10’
0’
N

HOA SLOPE - SLOPE AND PARKWAY PLANTING TYPOLOGY
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"
PROJECT: 1730882
DATE: APRIL 21, 2022

HARVEST GLEN
NTS

KEY MAP
‘C’ STREET
PARK

HOA PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA SLOPE - SHRUB
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT
ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’ -MANZANITA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’ BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE AMBITION GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE
TREE

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE
VINE

FICUS PUMILA - CREEPING FIG
LONICERA J. HALLIANA - JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE
MACFADYA UNGUIS CATII - CAT’S CLAW VINE
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT

SPECIES APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE

INCORPORATED AT TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK
AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S
REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE,
AND SPACING ON SHEET 11.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES

NOT REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK

FOR APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED

PLANTERS AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE

PLANT THAT WILL FIT WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE
HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.
1 1
2 2
3 3
6 4
5 6
5 4

PLANTING LEGEND
09/28/2023
10 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 31

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
384 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132

PLANT PALETTE
Riverside County Ordinance 859 Landscape Water Use Calculations Project Type
(Insert Project Name, Description)

0.50 ETo allowance
Applicant to use drop down menus in cells that indicate a selection to describe each hydrozone.

Where "INPUT" is shown, applicant to enter project specific information.

Please note that embedded formulas will reflect as 'false' or as an error until selections are completed. 1 Maximum Annual Water Allowance (MAWA)
INPUT the total square footage of landscape = 96,430 S.F.

INPUT the Hist. ETo for the area = 57.33
MAWA = 229,115 cu ft / yr
2 Estimated Annual Water Use (EAWU)
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 1 - Park Turf Plant Factor = 0.5 Turf - Recreational Moderate INPUT Square Foot Area of Hydrozone = 1,180
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.75
EAWU = 3,738 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 2 - Park Shrub Plant Factor = 0.5 Shrubs / Groundcover Moderate INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 2,050
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.80
EAWU = 6,088 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 3 - HOA Parkway Plant Factor = 0.2 Shrubs / Groundcover Low INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 34,000
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.80
EAWU = 40,392 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 4 - HOA landscape Plant Factor = 0.5 Shrubs / Groundcover Moderate INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 5,050
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.60
EAWU = 19,998 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 5 -Valley Wide Maint. Plant Factor = 0.2 Shrubs / Groundcover Low INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 54,150
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.75
EAWU = 68,618 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 6 Plant Factor = 0 n/a n/a
INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 0
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 1
EAWU = 0 cu ft / yr
SubTotal EAWU = 138,834 cu ft / yr
Input Irrigation System Operation Factor 0.85
Total EAWU = 163,334
MAWA - EAWU = 65,781 cu ft / yr
(this number must be positive)
PERCENTAGE OF WATER SAVED RELATIVE TO MAX. ALLOWED = 29% * Trees are not required to be listed as a separate hydrozone if understory is planted with plants of an equal or higher plant factor, and foot area is already included in calculations. n/a
Residential
Rotor
In-line Drip-Sparsely Planted
Spray
In-line Drip-Sparsely Planted
Rotor
PLANTING NOTES:

1. Plants shall be grouped according to water use factors per WUCOLS zones / compliant with Ordinance 859.3.

2. Turf shall only be used for functional or recreational purposes.

3. This site is not located within 1 mile of MSHCP or environmentally sensitive areas.

4. This site is not located in a high risk fire zone.

5. Slope planting shall be consistent with minimum standards for Building & Safety erosion control standards (Ordinance 457, Section 33361.1).

6. Trees shall be planted at a minimum of 30’ intervals along parkways.

7. No trees shall not be planted in the Tree Exclusion Zone of the County Right-of Way set by Ordinance 461 - Standard 1101.

8. 2 front yard trees and 1 street tree to be provided.

9. Limit natural plant height to 30” within line-of-sight impact areas: drive entries/ parking islands/corners.

10. 3” minimum depth of shredded bark mulch in all planter areas, excluding turf and hydroseed areas.

11. For slopes 3:1 or steeper, permanent ground cover adequately planted with shrubs and/or trees

12. Plant material and mulch suitable for slope use and prevention of surface erosion

13. Plant selection and supporting notes to ensure full slope coverage within 12 months of planting
IRRIGATION NOTES:

1. All areas requiring landscape shall include the installation of a permanent automatic irrigation system. Turf and shrub irrigation systems shall be irrigated separately.

2. Sprinkler heads adjacent to all walkways and areas of pedestrian or vehicular traffic shall be spring retractable types.

3. Pop-up sprinklers shall have matched precipitation rates.

4. All valves shall be wired independently.

5. Irrigation backflow prevention devices and controllers shall be located and/or screened with appropriate plant material to minimize visibility.

6. Detail irrigation plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect.

7. Irrigation plans shall be submitted to the appropriate reviewing agencies for approval prior to installation.

8. Irrigation design shall comply with Ordinance 859.3 and the State’s latest Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO).

9. No overhead irrigation shall be within 24” of non-permeable surface.

10. Subsurface or low-volume irrigation shall be used for irregularly shaped areas, or areas less than 10’ in width.

11. All equipment and plans shall conform to recycled water use requirements.

12. All trees to receive dedicated bubbler system.

PLANTING NOTES (Continued):

14. Trees at 1:750 sf, shrubs at 1:100 sf of slope area

15. Plant material to be grouped into compatible hydrozones

16. An agronomic soils analysis and recommendations report shall be included on the plans and provide report with landscape construction document set for plan check.

17. All plants shall be placed so that the mature width will be equal or less than the width of the planter area it is planted within to limit the required amount of trimming and maintenance.

18. Plants will be checked carefully at plan check for appropriateness to final width of proposed planters at plan check, please only propose plant that will fit within and are appropriate height - without requiring maintenance trimming. 09/28/2023
11 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 32

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
385 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132
NTS
Succulent and
grasses
Boulders
Multi-trunk palo verde
Metal signage wall
with corten steel
color/treatment
12’-0”
4’-6”
The Entry Monumentation sign at Harvest Glen includes a mix of natural and man-made materials to establish a visual contrast between the two. Framed with boulders on both sides, the metal panel is treated to with corten color and finish. The planting softens the signage with textures and a range of green, gray and yellow colors.

SIGNAGE ENLARGEMENT
3'-0"
12'-0"
24’
16’
8’
0’
N
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"
PROJECT: 1730882
DATE: APRIL 21, 2022

HARVEST GLEN
NTS

KEY MAP
‘A’ STREET

PALOMAR STREET
09/28/2023
12 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

ENTRY MONUMENTATION
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 33

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
386 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132
NTS
The park monumentation is a smaller and simpler version of the entry monumentation, establishing appropriate
hierarchy and continuity between the two.
4’-6”
6’-0”
Metal signage wall
with corten steel
color/treatment

SIGNAGE ENLARGEMENT
3'-0"
12'-0"
24’
16’
8’
0’
N
SCALE: 1" = 60'-0"
PROJECT: 1730882
DATE: APRIL 21, 2022

HARVEST GLEN
NTS

KEY MAP
‘A’ STREET

PALOMAR STREET

PARK MONUMENTATION
09/28/2023
13 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 34

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
387 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132
180’
120’
60’
0’
N

D STREET

E STREET

F STREET

G STREET

A STREET

C STREET

H STREET

I STREET

JUNIPERO ROAD

B STREETB STREET

PALOMAR STREET
SYMBOL

DESCRIPTION

VINYL FENCE

WALL AND FENCE LEGEND

SPLITFACE BLOCK WALL ATOP RETAINING WALL

TUBE STEEL/WROUGHT IRON FENCE AND GATE

LOW TUBE STEEL/WROUGHT IRON FENCE AND GATE

SPLITFACE BLOCK WALL

WALL PILASTER

PRECISION BLOCK WALL

TUBE STEEL GATE

MONUMENTATION SIGN
NOTE:

1. RETURN WALLS AT FRONT OF HOMES AND WALLS VISIBLE
FROM THE STREET SHALL BE 6’ HIGH MASONRY / BLOCK
WALL.

2. ALL WALLS, FENCES, GATES, PILASTERS AND SIMILAR

DESIGNED WITH MATERIAL AND FINISHES THAT

COMPLEMENT PROJECT ARCHITECTURE PER CITY OF
MENIFEE STANDARDS FOR MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION.

THESE WILL BE SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW BY THE

CITY AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLAN
CHECK. FURTHER DETAILING TO BE CONDUCTED DURING

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE FOR FOOTING AND
DETAIL ELEMENTS.
09/28/2023
14 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

WALL AND FENCE PLAN
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 35

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
388 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132
C
L
F.G.
6' MAX
6'-6" MAX.

ELEVATION

SECTION

SPLIT FACE BLOCK RING BLOCK PILASTER

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL
6" MAX
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

HIGHER LOT

LOWER LOT
VARIES
F.G.

PROPERTY
LINE

ELEVATION

SECTION

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE

BLOCK WALL

VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

HARVEST GLEN AND COUNTRYSIDE - WALL AND FENCE DETAILS

RICHLAND COMMUNITIES

MENIFEE, CA

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
SCALE: 1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE ATOP RETAINING WALL
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
F.G.

WIDE VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL GATE

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
6' MAX
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION
C
L

GATE HANDLE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
6' MAX

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

GATE LATCH

GATE HINGE

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
3' MAX
F.G.

C
L
3' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

LOW TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE AT TOT LOT
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
C L
F.G.
6' MAX
6'-6" MAX.

ELEVATION

SECTION

SPLIT FACE BLOCK RING BLOCK PILASTER

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL
6" MAX
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

HIGHER LOT

LOWER LOT
VARIES
F.G.

PROPERTY
LINE

ELEVATION

SECTION

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE

BLOCK WALL

VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

HARVEST GLEN AND COUNTRYSIDE - WALL AND FENCE DETAILS

RICHLAND COMMUNITIES

MENIFEE, CA

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
SCALE: 1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE ATOP RETAINING WALL
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
F.G.

WIDE VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL GATE

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
6' MAX
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION
C
L

GATE HANDLE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
6' MAX

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

GATE LATCH

GATE HINGE

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
3' MAX
F.G.

C
L
3' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

LOW TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE AT TOT LOT
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
C
L
F.G.
6' MAX
6'-6" MAX.

SECTION

SPLIT FACE BLOCK RING BLOCK PILASTER

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

HIGHER LOT

LOWER LOT
VARIES
F.G.

PROPERTY
LINE

SECTION
AILS
LL
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
F.G.

WIDE VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL GATE

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
6' MAX
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION
C
L

GATE HANDLE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
6' MAX

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

GATE LATCH

GATE HINGE

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
3' MAX
F.G.

C
L
3' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

LOW TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE AT TOT LOT
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
C
L
F.G.
6' MAX
6'-6" MAX.

ELEVATION

SECTION

SPLIT FACE BLOCK RING BLOCK PILASTER

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL
6" MAX
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

HIGHER LOT

LOWER LOT
VARIES
F.G.

PROPERTY
LINE

ELEVATION

SECTION

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE

BLOCK WALL

VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

HARVEST GLEN AND COUNTRYSIDE - WALL AND FENCE DETAILS

RICHLAND COMMUNITIES

MENIFEE, CA

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
SCALE: 1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE ATOP RETAINING WALL
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
F.G.

WIDE VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL GATE

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
6' MAX
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION
C
L

GATE HANDLE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
6' MAX

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

GATE LATCH

GATE HINGE

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
3' MAX
F.G.

C
L
3' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

LOW TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE AT TOT LOT
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
NOTE:

1. RETURN WALLS AT FRONT OF HOMES AND WALLS VISIBLE
FROM THE STREET SHALL BE 6’ HIGH MASONRY / BLOCK
WALL.

2. ALL WALLS, FENCES, GATES, PILASTERS AND SIMILAR

DESIGNED WITH MATERIAL AND FINISHES THAT

COMPLEMENT PROJECT ARCHITECTURE PER CITY OF
MENIFEE STANDARDS FOR MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION.

THESE WILL BE SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW BY THE

CITY AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLAN
CHECK. FURTHER DETAILING TO BE CONDUCTED DURING

CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE FOR FOOTING AND
DETAIL ELEMENTS.
09/28/2023
15 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

WALL AND FENCE DETAILS
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 36

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
389 of 1244

HARVEST GLEN - PA 9 - TTM 38132

MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT - FOR REFERENCE
PERCENTAGE OF TURF AREA : .9%
*MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT PREPARED BY K&A CIVIL ENGINEERS, SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF MENIFEE PER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL *Tree count is not reflective of the current landscape design 09/28/2023
16 OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 37

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
390 of 1244

138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
128
129
130
131
132
127
126
125
LOT 147
133
134
135
136
137
121
122
123
124
116
117
118
119
120
32 45444342414039
38 37 36 35 34 33
115
114
113
112
111 110 109 108
107
70 69
68 71
67 66
65 64
63 62
61 60 59 58
106
105
9190 92
878889
72 73 74 75 76 77
83848586
93 94 95 96
101
102
103
104
57 56 55 54 53
17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 56789
4 3
2 1
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
47 48 49
505152
TR 38133-1
TR 38133-F
"A" STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS
VARELA
"B" STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS
"C" STREET
"D" STREET
"E" STREET
"G" STREET

RECREATION CIRCLE
ZONE (SP COMM PARK) PA 20GP-SP327-320-012

SP (COMM PARK)COMMUNITY CENTERMARION ASHLEY
(MB 014/044-046)
ZONE (SHOOL) PA 21GP-SP327-320-011

SFP (SCHOOL)ELEMENTARY SCHOOLHARVEST VALLEY
(MB 014/044-046)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-310-057
SP
ZONE (RR1)
GP-RR1327-310-033
SP

ZONE (SP)
GP-SP (MED)327-310-037
SP
327-310-024
(MB 014/044-046)
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5
RCFCD327-310-064
ZONE (SP)GP-SP (COM) PA19327-310-063
SP
(MB 014/044-046)
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5
ZONE (SP)GP-SP (COM) PA19327-310-048
SP
(MB 014/044-046)
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5
FUTURE MDP SDLINE A-3
327-430-013
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-022

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-023

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-024

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-025

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-026

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-027

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-028

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-029

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)

ZONE (SP)
GP-SP (COM) PA 23B327-320-020
VACANT
(MB 014/044-046)
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5

ZONE (SP)
GP-SP (COM) PA 23B327-320-020
VACANT
(MB 014/044-046)
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5
LOT 152 O.S.

VARELA LANE
~
~
"H" STREET
"I" STREET
LOT 146

TOT LOT
46 LANE
\A1;30'\A1;30'
\A1;39'
78 79 80
8182
97 98
99 100

WATER QUALITY BASIN

DRAINAGE AND
1 2
3 4
5 6
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
36 37
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 SQ. FT.
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
86 87
88 89
90 91
92 93
94 95
96 97
98 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141

LOT TABLE
TRACT NO. 38133
SQ. FT. SQ. FT.

LOT TABLE
TRACT NO. 38133 CONT.

SQ. FT. SQ. FT.

LOT TABLE
TRACT NO. 38133 CONT.

SQ. FT.LOT NO. LOT AREA PAD AREA LOT AREA PAD AREA LOT AREA PAD AREALOT NO. LOT NO.

AVERAGE
SUM

AREA SF

MIN LOT
3,780
4,476
3,780
142
143
144
145
SQ. FT.

TRACT NO. 38133 CONT.

TOT LOT / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA
LOT AREALOT NO.

NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS / MAINTENANCE

USE / MAINTENANCE
146
147
148
149
150
73,579
6,826
3,962
3,039
44,069
151 4,199
4,301
152 25,956
{\C256;4,877}
{\C256;4,530}
{\C256;5,259}
{\C256;4,356}
{\C256;4,008}
{\C256;4,018}
{\C256;4,027}
{\C256;4,036}
{\C256;4,046}
{\C256;4,055}
{\C256;4,065}
{\C256;4,083}
{\C256;4,093}
{\C256;4,102}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,043}
{\C256;3,943}
{\C256;4,768}
{\C256;8,144}
{\C256;6,644}
{\C256;4,402}
{\C256;4,400}
{\C256;4,400}
{\C256;5,597}
{\C256;3,826}
{\C256;3,780}
{\C256;3,785}
{\C256;3,821}
{\C256;4,205}
{\C256;5,624}
{\C256;4,362}
{\C256;4,385}
{\C256;4,423}
{\C256;4,388}
{\C256;4,380}
{\C256;4,346}
{\C256;4,284}
{\C256;4,194}
{\C256;4,160}
{\C256;7,242}
{\C256;10,836}
{\C256;6,006}
{\C256;5,181}
{\C256;4,558}
{\C256;4,263}
{\C256;4,158}
{\C256;5,039}
{\C256;4,604}
{\C256;4,641}
{\C256;4,854}
{\C256;4,691}
{\C256;4,158}
{\C256;3,945}
{\C256;4,674}
{\C256;8,630}
{\C256;6,918}
{\C256;3,893}
{\C256;3,908}
{\C256;3,783}
{\C256;3,780}
{\C256;3,817}
{\C256;3,840}
{\C256;4,318}
{\C256;4,163}
{\C256;3,991}
{\C256;4,099}
{\C256;3,867}
{\C256;4,394}
{\C256;4,523}
{\C256;4,862}
{\C256;4,862}
{\C256;4,862}
{\C256;4,867}
{\C256;4,994}
{\C256;5,042}
{\C256;5,592}
{\C256;7,828}
{\C256;3,960}
{\C256;4,387}
{\C256;4,453}
{\C256;4,804}
{\C256;5,060}
{\C256;5,082}
{\C256;4,530}
{\C256;5,259}
{\C256;4,938}
{\C256;4,008}
{\C256;4,018}
{\C256;4,027}
{\C256;4,036}
{\C256;4,046}
{\C256;4,055}
{\C256;4,065}
{\C256;4,083}
{\C256;4,093}
{\C256;4,102}
{\C256;5,705}
{\C256;4,286}
{\C256;4,037}
{\C256;4,005}
{\C256;4,030}
{\C256;5,139}
{\C256;3,826}
{\C256;3,780}
{\C256;5,684}
{\C256;4,166}
{\C256;4,460}
{\C256;4,628}
{\C256;4,663}
{\C256;4,698}
{\C256;4,733}
{\C256;4,768}
{\C256;4,797}
{\C256;4,605}
{\C256;6,484}
{\C256;8,657}
{\C256;5,126}
{\C256;4,531}
{\C256;4,203}
{\C256;3,922}
{\C256;3,838}
{\C256;3,859}
{\C256;3,884}
{\C256;3,914}
{\C256;3,952}
{\C256;3,938}
{\C256;5,039}
{\C256;4,604}
{\C256;4,020}
{\C256;4,046}
{\C256;4,073}
{\C256;4,100}
{\C256;4,126}
{\C256;5,073}
{\C256;4,854}
{\C256;4,756}
{\C256;4,158}
{\C256;3,945}
{\C256;4,674}
{\C256;8,630}
{\C256;6,918}
{\C256;3,893}
{\C256;3,908}
{\C256;3,783}
{\C256;3,780}
{\C256;3,817}
{\C256;3,840}
{\C256;4,318}
{\C256;4,105}
{\C256;3,839}
{\C256;3,853}
{\C256;3,867}
{\C256;3,867}
{\C256;4,394}
{\C256;4,523}
{\C256;4,368}
{\C256;4,397}
{\C256;4,275}
{\C256;4,207}
{\C256;4,194}
{\C256;4,180}
{\C256;4,166}
{\C256;4,148}
{\C256;4,530}
{\C256;5,140}
{\C256;7,828}
{\C256;3,960}
{\C256;4,387}
{\C256;4,453}
{\C256;4,804}
{\C256;5,060}
TOTAL
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,043}
{\C256;3,943}
{\C256;4,768}
{\C256;7,543}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032}
{\C256;4,032} {\C256;649,025}{\C256;623,647}
{\C256;4,158}
{\C256;4,158}
{\C256;4,158}
{\C256;4,158}
{\C256;3,807}{\C256;3,807}
{\C256;3,834}{\C256;3,959}
{\C256;3,816}{\C256;3,867}
{\C256;3,993}
{\C256;5,042}
{\C256;5,042}

OS WITH V-DITCH / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA
153 1,790
154 2,867
155 439

EMERGENCY ACCESS / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA
156 560
157 944
158 1,091
159 733
160 1,133
161 1,021
162 1,287
163 568
164 630

DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY BASIN /
SQ. FT. SQ. FT.

LOT AREA PAD AREA
{\C256;3,785}
{\C256;3,821}
{\C256;4,205}
{\C256;5,313}
{\C256;3,923}{\C256;3,923}
{\C256;3,846}{\C256;3,846}
{\C256;3,846}{\C256;3,846}
{\C256;3,846}{\C256;3,846}
{\C256;3,846}{\C256;3,846}
{\C256;3,846}{\C256;3,846}
{\C256;3,846}{\C256;3,846}
{\C256;3,846}{\C256;3,846}
{\C256;3,807}{\C256;3,807}
{\C256;3,807}{\C256;3,807}
{\C256;3,807}{\C256;3,807}
{\C256;3,807}{\C256;3,807}
{\C256;3,807}{\C256;3,807}
{\C256;3,807}{\C256;3,807}
{\C256;3,950}{\C256;3,950}
{\C256;3,816}
{\C256;3,816}
{\C256;3,816}
{\C256;3,816}
{\C256;3,816}
{\C256;3,816}

OPEN SPACE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA
{\C256;3,780}{\C256;3,780}
{\C256;3,780}{\C256;3,780}
{\C256;3,780}{\C256;3,780}
{\C256;3,780}{\C256;3,780}
{\C256;3,780}{\C256;3,780}

CITY-CFD & VALLEY-WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

OPEN SPACE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

OPEN SPACE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE / VALLEY WIDE OR HOA
NTS
CITY OF MENIFEE STD. NO. 115, MODIFIED

MALONE AVENUE (NORTH OF

VARELA LANE)
\A1;94'

2.0%%%
R/W
\A1;12'
\A1;60'

2.0%%%
\A1;12' \A1;8'
10' STREET

DEDICATION

2.0%%%
\A1;PRKWY.
6'
S/W
PROP. E'LY R/W EXIST. E'LY R/W
\A1;50'
\A1;8'
2%%% MIN
(2;1 MAX)
\A1;10'
FL
VARIES
20%%% MAX
\A1;13'

2.0%%%

MALONE AVENUE (SOUTH OF

VARELA LANE)
EXIST. E'LY
R/W PROP. E'LY R/W
\A1;22'\A1;12'
\A1;20'
EXIST. W'LY R/W
\A1;20'

2.0%%% 2.0%%%
\A1;2'
6'
S/W

STREET DEDICATION
\A1;33'
FL
\A1;4'
\A1;38' \A1;38' \A1;26'
\A1;5'
\A1;SW
\A1;DEDICATION
\A1;48'
\A1;123' \A1;59'
\A1;ULTIMATE DEDICATION & IMPROVEMENTS BY OTHERS\A1;59' 5'
SW
10'
TRAIL
\A1;5'
EXIST. R/W EXIST. R/W ULT. R/W PROP. R/W

2.0%%%2.0%%% 2.0%%% 2.0%%%

BRIGGS ROAD
{\LMAJOR HIGHWAY}
\A1;21'
NOTE: EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS-PAVING AND CURB & GUTTER
FROM CL RECREATION TO APPROX. 140' SOUTH

\A1;94'

2.0%%%
\A1;30' STREET DEDICATION \A1;20'
\A1;%%P10'
\A1;EXIST. PAVEMENT
\A1;9'
\A1;LS
\A1;5'
\A1;SW
\A1;12'
\A1;12'
\A1;8'
\A1;LS

2.0%%%
PROP. S'LY R/W
{\LSECONDARY HIGHWAY}

WATSON ROAD
EXIST. S'LY
R/W EXIST. N'LY R/W
\A1;50'
\A1;18' \A1;32'

2.0%%%
R/W
{\LCOLLECTOR STREET}
\A1;22'
\A1;66'

2.0%%%
\A1;6'
\A1;LS
VARIES \A1;22'
R/W

2.0%%%
\A1;6'
\A1;LS
5'
S/W
NTS
CITY OF MENIFEE STD. NO. 113, MODIFIED
5'
S/W

RECREATION CIRCLE
\A1;MARION
ASHLEY
CENTER
N'LY
S'LY\A1;LOT 1
\A1;TTM 38133
\A1;EXISTING
\A1;IMPROVEMENTS

2.0%%%
R/W \A1;56'

2.0%%%
\A1;PRKWY.
\A1;36'\A1;10'

2.0%%%
\A1;10'
\A1;STREET DEDICATION
R/W

2.0%%%
\A1;PRKWY.
6'
S/W
NTS
CITY OF MENIFEE STD. NO. 115,

MODIFIED
6'
S/W
"A" THROUGH "I" STREETS AND

CALLE DE CABALLOS

2.0%%%
R/W
{\L ENHANCED LOCAL STREET}
\A1;60'

2.0%%%
\A1;PRKWY.
\A1;9'
\A1;40'\A1;10'

2.0%%%
\A1;9'
\A1;10'
R/W

2.0%%%
\A1;PRKWY.
6'
S/W
NTS
CITY OF MENIFEE STD. NO.
115, MODIFIED

VARELA LANE EAST OF

MALONE AVENUE

TENTATIVE

TRACT MAP
NO. 38133

CITY OF MENIFEE
LOTS 261, 262, 263, 264, 265 AND A PORTION OF LOT 271 OF ROMOLA NO. 5, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

SCHEDULE "A"

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP

CITY OF MENIFEE
SHEET

OF SHEET
DWG. NO. ____
KO
BM/JS
Checked By:

Scale: AS SHOWN
Drawn By:

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION APDDATE
REV Engineering, Inc.
357 N. SHERIDAN STREET

ENGINEERINGSURVEYING
SUITE 117
CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92880
TEL. (951) 279-1800
FAX (951) 279-4380
Drawing: R:\\280967\\PA 22 - TTM 38133\\Preliminary\\TTM 38133\\967 - TTM 38133 - 001.dwg Layout: 30x42 L Saved: 6/30/2022 2:37 PM Plotted: 10/12/2022 4:02 PM Plot Scale: 1:2.9348 By: Beverly Marinas 1 2
NO. 38133
%%UVICINITY MAP
N.T.S.

T5S, R3W, SECTION 11
STATE HWY.

SULTANAS ROAD

BRIGGS RD

MALAGA ROAD
ANTELOPE RD.

WATSON ROAD
MATTHEWS RD.

PROJECT SITE
%%UMOBILE HOME AND R.V. PARKING
%%UDISPOSAL
%%UAERIAL TOPOGRAPHY
VACANT
MENIFEE NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP260) -
SCHEDULE "A"
%%uUTILITIES AND SERVICES%%uPRESENT USE%%uPROPOSED USE
%%UZONING - CURRENT
%%UASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER
%%UPROPOSED STORM DRAINS%%UGEOLOGIC HAZARD NOTE
%%uPROPERTY ACREAGE
TOTAL AREA = GROSS 28.8 AC.,
THOMAS GUIDE RIVERSIDE (2007) PAGES 808 J7
%%UGENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
SPECIFIC PLAN %%USECTIONS, TOWNSHIPS AND
%%uTHOMAS BROTHERS MAP
%%UWELLS
%%UCOMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT

1.7 AC

2.3 AC

WATER QUALITY BASIN

OPEN SPACE/LANDSCAPE
%%UPROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

NOT WITHIN LIMITS OF STUDY PER FEMA PANEL
%%UOWNER/ APPLICANT%%uENGINEER
CORONA, CA 92880
PROJECT MANAGER: JUSTIN SAKAKURA, P.E.

PHONE: (951) 279-1800
K & A ENGINEERING, INC.
357 N. SHERIDAN STREET, SUITE 117

14.9 ACRESIDENTIAL LOTS
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
%%UAGENCY SERVING THE AREA %%UFACILITIES PRESENT
TOTAL AREA = 26.5 AC
IRVINE, CA 92612
ATTN: %%UBRIAN HARDY

WSI LAND HOLDINGS, LLC
3161 MICHELSON DR., SUITE 425
PH: 949-698-2191
%%UACRES
145PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL LOTS:

7.6 ACROADWAYS
327-320-001, 327-320-014, 327-320-015, 327-320-017, 327-320-018 PROPOSED DRAINAGE & STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS WILL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH SUBDIVISION. STORM DRAIN SYSTEMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY R.C.F.C. & W.D. OR CITY OF MENIFEE \W0.8500;PROJECT SITE IS NOT SUBJECT TO LIQUEFACTION GEOLOGIC HAZARDS: ALQUIST-PRIOLO OR SPECIAL STUDIES ZONE \W0.8500;THERE ARE NO KNOWN EXISTING WELLS ON SITE OR WITHIN 200 FEET OF PROPERTY ARROWHEAD MAPPING CORP. - DATED
4/09/2021 P.O. BOX 9791
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92427
\W0.8500;THERE IS NO SUBSURFACE SEPTIC DISPOSAL PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT. \W0.8500;THERE IS NO DESIGNATED MOBILE HOME OR R.V. PARKING PARKING FACILITIES PROPOSED FOR THIS PROJECT.

ELECTRIC:

GAS:

TELEPHONE:

CABLE TV: WATER:

SEWER:

SCHOOL DIST:

SCHOOL DIST:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.

FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS

TIME WARNER

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT

ROMOLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
{\LEARTHWORK QUANTITIES:}
CUT = 55,000 CY
FILL = 87,000 CY
ALLOWABLE DENSITY:

PROPOSED DENSITY:

MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 5.1 TO 8 DU/AC

5.5 DU/ACMEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

THIS PROJECT REPRESENTS THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS
%%UCONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP
OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER.
{\LRECYCLED WATER NOTE:}

RECYCLED WATER WILL NOT BE USED FOR ONSITE

LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION
MENIFEE NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN (SP260, A4)
%%UZONING - PROPOSED
{\LGENERAL NOTES:}

1.NO EXISTING STRUCTURES ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE SITE

2.ALL PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL BE AT 2:1 MAX

3.ALL PROPOSED STREETS SHALL BE PUBLIC STREETS

4.FINAL MAP CAN BE PHASED

5.PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN AN AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE
{\LBENCHMARK:}
A STANDARD C.&G.S. BRASS DISK AS DESCRIBED BY COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY 1935 5.7 MI NW FROM WINCHESTER, 4.9 MILES

NORTH AND WEST ALONG OILED ROADS FROM THE ATCHISON,

TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY STATION AT WINCHESTER,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, THENCE 0.8 MILE NORTH ALONG THE JUNIPER SPRINGS ROAD, 0.1 MILE WEST OF A CURVE NEAR A ROCKY POINT, 50 YARDS EAST OF THE JUNCTION OF A DIRT ROAD LEADING NORTH, 58 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE ROAD, AND IN THE TOP OF THE MIDDLE ONE OF THE THREE LARGE EMBEDDED BOULDERS.

A STANDARD DISK, STAMPED S 311 1935.

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BENCHMARK I.D. M-108
{ELEVATION: 1722.499 (NGVD 29')}
PLANNING AREAS 22 (MHDR) AND 23A (HDR)
PLANNING AREA 22 - MHDR
%%URANGES
NET AREA = 26.5 AC.

NO. 06065C2060H
REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF MENIFEE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL A: (APN: 327-320-001)
PARCEL C: [APN: 327-320-014 (LOTS 261 AND 262), 327-320-015 (PORTION OF LOT 263) AND 327-320-017 (PORTION OF LOT 263)] THAT PORTION OF LOT 263 OF ROMOLA NO. 5, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 14 PAGES 44 THROUGH 46 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY
OF SAID LOT 263, 66 FEET NORTH OF THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF;

THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING NORTH
ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT, 132 FEET;

THENCE EAST RUNNING PARALLEL WITH THE
SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT, 640 FEET TO THE
EAST BOUNDARY THEREOF;
THENCE SOUTH ON THE EAST BOUNDARY, 132
FEET;

THENCE WEST RUNNING PARALLEL WITH THE
SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT, 640 FEET TO THE
PARCEL B: (APN: 327-320-018)
LOTS 264, 265 AND 271 OF ROMOLA NO. 5, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 14, PAGES 44 TO 46 OF MAPS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDS.

EXCEPTING FROM LOT 271 THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 19, 1998 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 98-251793 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

LOTS 261, 262, AND 263, INCLUSIVE, OF ROMOLA NO. 5, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 14, PAGES 44 TO 46 OF MAPS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY RECORDS.

EXCEPTING FROM LOT 263 THE NORTH 132 FEET OF THE SOUTH 198 FEET THEREOF. \W0.8500;A PORTION ON THE WESTERLY HALF OF NORTHWESTERLY QUARTER OF SEC. 36, T5S, R3W, S.B.M.

RESIDENTIAL/OPEN SPACE/WATER QUALITY AND DETENTION BASIN MALONE
VARELA
LN.
0 SCALE: 1"=100'
100 200 300{\LSITE MAP / PHASING MAP}
%%UEXISTING EASEMENT NOTES
AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND UTILITY PURPOSES. RECORDED 2/25/2010 AS INSTR. NO. 10-0086883 OF O.R. %%UDISPOSITION

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN

TO REMAIN
AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN SIERRA POWERPRE DOC RECORDED 4/11/1928 IN BOOK 758 OF DEEDS PG 180. (OVER ALL STREETS, HIGHWAYS, ALLEY WAYS, AND PUBLIC PLACES. NOT PLOTTED. 20' EMWD PER INSTR. NO. 110409. RECORDED 12/6/1961.
2 CALIFORNIA
74 AVE
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 38

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
391 of 1244

AT-106
1523.14
DI
PIPE
W/L
1525.9
U/O
S
PIPE
SIGN
M M
M
M
M
MMMM
F/H
M

M M M M
F/H
M M
MMMM
M
M
MM MMM
DI
M
M
M

CULTIVATED
FIELD

CULTIVATED
FIELD

CULTIVATED
FIELD

CULTIVATED
FIELD

CULTIVATED
FIELD
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE

TREESDENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES

PLAYGROUND

PLAYGROUND
S
M
M
S
S
S
M
M
M
M
DIDI
M M
F/H
M
M
MM
MMMM
MM
MM
S F/H
S
M/B
M/B
M/B
M/BM/B
M/B
M/B
M
S
MH
MH
ROCKS
S
U/O
U/O
FP
M
ASPH
ASPH
ASPH
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
DECK
CONC
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES
DENSE
TREES

CULTIVATED
FIELD

CULTIVATED
FIELD
DIRT
DIRT
DIRT
DIRT
DIRT
GROUND

OBSCURED
1521.61522.61523.21523.81524.11524.51524.61524.51524.41524.11523.91523.71523.41524.21525.61526.11526.91527.71530.61531.4 1522.81522.71523.21523.71524.21524.71525.01525.21525.11524.91524.71524.51524.41524.41524.61525.41526.21527.91528.71529.61532.1 1523.41523.51523.51524.31524.91525.51525.61525.51525.41525.51525.71525.91525.81525.61525.91526.51527.61528.31529.11531.51532.4 1524.41524.31524.31524.91525.51526.41526.61526.61526.71526.81526.91526.81526.81527.01527.31527.81528.51529.21530.11531.31533.21534.1 1525.31525.21525.21525.81526.71527.41527.71527.81527.71527.51527.71527.41527.51528.11528.71529.41529.81530.61532.71537.51537.7 1526.11525.81526.61527.41527.81528.21528.31528.61528.91528.81533.31538.4 1526.21526.91526.51527.81528.61529.71529.51529.91529.91531.71532.21532.61533.31534.11535.51535.81536.61537.5 1526.51527.91528.71529.11529.61530.31530.21530.61530.41527.81532.31532.91533.51534.21534.91535.61537.2 1527.41528.31528.41528.81529.31529.61530.41530.51530.91531.41530.71531.41531.61533.71534.41535.61537.11537.41537.6 1528.41529.51529.81530.31531.21531.61531.91531.81532.51532.81533.31534.11535.41535.71536.31538.61538.61539.2 1529.11529.71529.81530.11530.41530.91531.61532.41532.51532.91533.41533.71534.41535.31536.31536.71537.21539.41540.71541.3 1529.61530.41530.61530.91531.11531.61532.41532.81533.21533.31533.81534.21534.71535.31536.11536.71537.31541.11542.3 1530.11531.31531.51531.61532.51533.11533.61533.91534.21534.81535.11535.51536.31537.71538.21538.71539.41541.61542.4 1531.91532.51532.31532.81533.41533.81534.41534.61535.11535.71536.11536.61537.41538.11538.51539.81540.41542.3 1532.41532.91533.31533.11533.61534.31534.71535.11535.41535.91536.61537.61538.61539.21539.71540.41541.21541.81542.3 1534.81534.31534.11534.11534.31535.61535.81536.31536.71537.41537.81538.71536.71540.31540.81541.51542.11542.8 1534.81535.01535.11535.91536.61536.81537.11537.51538.21538.71539.61536.41541.71542.71543.31544.31543.3 1535.11535.31535.61535.61536.11536.91537.41537.81538.01538.21539.91540.61544.51545.2 1535.91536.31536.11536.21537.11538.11538.71538.81539.81542.71544.91545.31546.41548.31549.51550.3 1537.51536.71537.11537.81538.31538.91539.11539.61540.71541.71542.31543.91544.71545.61546.61547.71552.1 1538.31538.41537.61538.01538.51538.71539.61539.51540.31540.61541.41542.41543.31544.51545.61546.61550.51551.8 1539.61539.31538.61538.91539.21539.51540.21540.81541.11541.41542.11543.21544.31545.21546.51547.51550.71551.41551.81552.5 1540.31539.41539.81540.21540.41540.81541.51541.91542.11542.71546.21547.21548.21554.1 1541.41540.81540.61541.21541.31541.91542.61542.91543.51544.61545.51547.21547.81548.81550.21554.6 1542.71542.51541.41541.91542.11542.21542.71543.31543.51544.21545.31546.11547.71548.31549.61552.21553.6 1543.41542.91542.21542.91543.11543.41544.31544.81545.31548.31548.81550.4 1544.51543.61543.21543.51544.01544.81545.21545.61546.51547.31549.11549.71551.1 1545.21544.81544.71544.81544.81544.71545.51546.61547.31548.11550.31552.31555.31557.61558.41560.6 1546.81547.21547.31547.91548.41548.91549.71550.81553.21554.31555.51556.71558.21559.41560.5 1549.81548.31548.11547.51547.71548.51549.91551.91552.31555.91556.21559.21562.5 1550.7
GROUND

OBSCURED
ASPH
1540.2
1538.5
1535.7
ASPH
ASPH
1548.2
ASPH
1558.6
M
1547.7
DENSE
TREES
1548.8
1549.6
1548.8
AT-105
1549.95
1548.8
1550.41548.7
1547.8
ASPH
1554.91555.4
1554.6
DENSE
TREES
CONC
1553.9
DENSE
TREES
1548.7
ASPH
M'SM'S
M
1543.1
1544.2
1540.4
1537.9
1540.3
1535.9
MM
1535.7
M M
1537.2
1532.4
AT-107
1529.92
1529.9
1535.9
1538.1
1538.1
1537.8
1538.5
1540.4
1539.3
1536.5
1530.7 1525.5 1524.6
1523.8 1523.5
1523.6 1523.7
1527.8
1532.5
1529.2 1529.2
1528.5 1527.5
1528.6
1526.8
1527.3
1521.71522.41523.61524.1
1526.2
1529.7
1542.5 1542.71543.2
1547.6 1546.6 1545.4 1545.5
1544.4
1537.3 1536.7
1536.6
1549.7
1549.6
1550.2
1551.2
1549.6
1547.5 1545.6
1543.6
1544.6
1539.1
1535.5
1538.3
1540.1
1540.7
1542.1
1543.3
1543.4
1545.71546.2
1548.5 1547.8
1549.81550.7
1548.9
1547.71547.41547.1
1547.5
1547.3
1547.6
1548.5
1549.1
1546.71547.6
1547.81548.4
1551.6
1548.4
1549.7 1549.5
1548.2
1552.2
1552.31556.3
1559.4
1560.4
1552.6
1554.2
1554.5
1555.6
1556.5
1557.5
1557.8
1557.3
1554.7
1553.9
1553.7
1550.2
1548.6
1550.7
1552.6
1553.5
1552.6
1555.6
1559.6
1558.8
1558.5
1558.8
1550.4
1547.5
1529.8
1527.5
1527.31527.4
1531.5
1554.1
1555.4
1556.6
1557.5
1562.6
1556.3
1549.1
1547.5
1548.4
ASPH
1544.1
1542.9
1542.6
1541.5
1546.8
1553.4
1553.3
1555.5
1536.3
1533.5
1534.5
1542.7
1541.7
1542.2
1534.5
DIDI
AT-108
1541.92
1525
1525
1530
1535
1530
1535
1535
1540
1540
1540
1545
1545
1550
1550
1555
1560
1555
1550
1550
U/O
UB
S
S
S
MH
S
U/O
MH
MH
GROUND

OBSCURED
GROUND

OBSCURED
GROUND

OBSCURED
GROUND

OBSCURED
GROUND

OBSCURED
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
ASPH
S
U/O
MMMM
M
M
S
S
S
S
MH MH
MH
S
SU/OMH
U/O
PIPE
GROUND

OBSCURED
GROUND

OBSCURED
GROUND

OBSCURED
GROUND

OBSCURED
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
CONC
ASPH
DIRT
U/O
F/H
M
M
F/H
S
MM M
GROUND

OBSCURED
M
CONC
MWV
U/O
U/O M
M
S
U/O
S
M
M
M
S
SIGN
S S
M'S
F/H
UB
UB
M
M'S
S
V
AT-101
F/H
U/O
S
UB
S
F/H
SIGN
1560.8
1562.7
1563.4
1562.6
1561.4
1560.6
1557.7
1556.4
1555.4
1554.5
1552.7
1551.4
1545.5
1544.5
1543.6
1542.4
1541.5
1540.5
1539.4
1538.5
1537.6
1536.2
1537.5
1538.5
1538.6
1537.5
1539.5
1541.5
1542.2
1542.5
1543.2
1544.1
1547.81548.2
1549.7
1550.4
1552.5
1559.8
1541.5
1535.6
1535.2 1533.2
1534.3
1532.6
1532.6
1533.5
1541.9
1562.8
ASPH
1558.2
1559.6
1558.3
1555.2
1555.8
ASPH
1554.6
1553.5
1552.6
1551.5
1550.5
1549.4
1548.4
1546.6
1547.5
ASPH
1545.5
1541.5
1541.3
1538.5
1540.7
1542.3
1534.6
1535.5
1536.6
ASPH
1531.6
ASPH
1535
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-310-057
SPZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-310-033

SPZONE (SP)GP-SP (MED)
327-310-037
SP327-310-024
(MB 014/044-046)
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5
RCFCD
327-310-064
ZONE (SP)GP-SP (COM) PA19
327-310-063
SP
(MB 014/044-046)
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5
ZONE (SP)GP-SP (COM) PA19
327-310-048
SP
(MB 014/044-046)
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5

FUTURE MDP SD
LINE A-3
327-430-013
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-022

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-023

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1
327-430-024

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-025

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1
327-430-026

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-027

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-028

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (RR1)GP-RR1327-430-029

SFP (RESIDENTIAL)
ZONE (SP COMM PARK) PA 20GP-SP327-320-012

SP (COMM PARK)COMMUNITY CENTERMARION ASHLEY
(MB 014/044-046)
ZONE (SP)GP-SP (COM) PA 23B
327-320-020
VACANT
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5
ZONE (SP)VACANT ZONE (SHOOL) PA 21GP-SP327-320-011

SFP (SCHOOL)ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

HARVEST VALLEY
(MB 014/044-046)
P=1538.3
P=1534.3
P=1535.4
P=1535.6
P=1535.9
P=1536.1
P=1536.4
P=1536.6
P=1536.9
P=1537.1
P=1537.4
P=1537.6
P=1537.9
P=1538.1
P=1535.8
P=1536.3
P=1536.7
P=1537.1
P=1537.6
P=1538.0
P=1535.3
P=1538.2
P=1533.3
P=1533.7 P=1533.5 P=1533.2
P=1532.9 P=1532.7
P=1532.5 P=1532.7 P=1533.2 P=1533.8 P=1534.4 P=1535.0 P=1535.7 P=1536.4
P=1537.1
P=1532.2
P=1532.0
P=1531.6
P=1531.0
P=1532.0
P=1531.8
P=1531.4
P=1531.1
P=1534.5
P=1534.9
P=1535.3
P=1534.1
P=1533.7
P=1533.3
P=1532.8
P=1535.4
P=1534.9
P=1534.5
P=1534.1
P=1533.7
P=1533.3
P=1532.9
P=1533.6P=1532.9P=1532.3 P=1535.7 P=1535.9 P=1536.2 P=1536.5 P=1536.9 P=1537.4 P=1538.2
P=1539.2
P=1532.2
P=1532.2
P=1532.2
P=1535.4
P=1538.5
P=1537.8
P=1537.2
P=1536.7
P=1536.2
P=1535.7
P=1538.5
P=1537.8
P=1537.2
P=1536.7
P=1536.2
P=1535.7
P=1539.1
P=1538.2
P=1537.2
P=1539.1
P=1538.2
P=1537.2
P=1540.2
P=1540.2
P=1540.6
P=1539.3
P=1539.6
P=1539.0P=1538.8
P=1541.3P=1541.5
138
139
140
141
142143144145
128 129 130 131 132
127
126
125
LOT 147
133 134 135 136
137
121
122 123
124
116
117
118119
120
32 44
43 42
41 40
3938
37 36
35 34
33 115
114
113
112
111
110
109
108
107 70 69 6871 67 66 65 64 63
62 61
60 59
106105
91 90
9287
88 8972
73 74
75 76
77 101
102
103 104
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 10
5 6
7 8
9 4 3 2
1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31

BRIGGS ROAD
LOT 150 L.&S.

LOT 152 O.S.

H
A
F2
I
1530.66 FS 11533.64 FS
1531.24 FS
1533.12 FS
1536.84 FS
(1526.70 FS)
(1535.50 FS)
(1536.7 FS) (1538.02 FS)
\A1;56'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'\A1;10'
\A1;56'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'\A1;10'
\A1;56'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'\A1;10'
\A1;56'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'\A1;10'
\A1;56'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'\A1;10'
\A1;56'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'\A1;10'
\A1;56'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'\A1;10'
\A1;56'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;18'\A1;18'\A1;10'\A1;10'
\A1;60'
\A1;30'\A1;20'\A1;20'
\A1;10'\A1;10'
\A1;66'\A1;33'
\A1;33'\A1;22'\A1;22'
\A1;59'
\A1;59'\A1;39'
\A1;20'\A1;28'\A1;%%P12'
\A1;60'\A1;30'
\A1;30'\A1;%%P12'\A1;10'
\A1;20'

1.20%%%

1.20%%%
GB
1529.34 FS
GB

1.90%%%
100' VC

1.37%%%
100' VC
1529.87 PVI

1.84%%%
100' VC
1533.10 PVI

0.70%%%
100' VC
1535.08 PVI
GB
1539.9 FS

2.20%%%
100' VC
1535.80 PVI
1530.32 PVI
100' VC

1.14%%%
100' VC
1531.66 PVI
GB
1536.5 FS
100' VC
1532.9 PVI

0.60%%%

0.60%%%
1536.2 FS
GB

0.70%%%
1537.30 FS
F2
A
E
H
I
B
D D

1.30%%%
P=1533.6
P=1533.3
P=1532.8
P=1532.3
P=1531.8
P=1531.5
P=1531.2
P=1530.8
P=1529.9
100' VC
1528.34 PVI

0.70%
GB
1529.53 FS

1.06%

2.20%2.20%

1.87%
1538.20 FS
GB
1538.9 FS
1531 TOP
1531 TOP
4:1 MAX

42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00'
129.61'
111.80'
108.42'
115.90'
110.20'

36.02'

42.64'

97.78'

97.56'

97.34'

97.11'

96.89'

96.66'

96.44'

96.22'

95.99'

95.77'

95.54'

95.32'

76.20'

47.42' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00'

89.34'

12.17'

8.51' 6.00'

26.75'28.96' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 33.36'

9.15'

6.50'

46.41'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

96.00'

91.24'

42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.31'

42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 68.33'

92.95'

94.04'
100.14'
100.26'
100.00'
100.00'
100.00'

25.46'

9.90' 74.19'

8.82'

38.85'44.00'44.00'44.01'44.12'40.74'

44.00' 44.00' 44.00' 54.79'

82.59'

10.53'

42.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

1.19%%%

99.87'
106.75'
123.07'
103.26'

99.64'

99.00'

99.00'

99.00'

99.00'

99.00'

99.00'

66.03'

14.21'

7.05'

33.93'

42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 43.01' 45.15'

17.46'
554.25'

91.43' 61.62'

25.44'

57.00'

4.83'

42.00'

43.00'

45.00'

45.00'

42.00'

42.00'

42.00'

42.00'

95.52'
240.04'

18.41'

33.94'42.00'42.00'42.00'68.01'100.07'

75.98'

99.00'

99.00'

97.74'

90.11'

98.78'
136.22'

92.05'

26.32'103.32'

7.09'

37.00'42.00'42.06'

42.69'

90.71'

42.69'4:1 MAX
4:1 MAX
4:1 MAX
2:1 MAX
B
C
C

42.25'42.29'

94.09'

90.82'

42.10'42.00'42.00'

32.00'

90.00'

90.00'

91.45'

91.09'

73.29'

25.04'7.65'

42.05'42.00'42.08'42.08'49.52'

41.09'

42.08'42.08'

99.40'

98.88'

96.31'

93.73'

74.23'4.24'

34.00' 42.00' 42.00'

41.98'
= 1 1 4
.
0 4
'
=
5 9
.
8 8
'

68.63'

21.30'

TOT LOT
2:1 MAX
2:1 MAX
2:1 MAX2:1 MAX
2:1 MAX
G1 G2
G2
G1
2:1 MAX 2:1 MAX

11.73'

27.82'171.68'

14.29'
183.68'

83.47'

92.00'

12.05'

92.00'

92.00'

92.00'

92.00'

92.00'

81.02' 12.73'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

10.29'

85.60'9.90'

93.89'

21.50'75.77'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

90.00'

86.37'

7.07'

83.52'17.07'

14.14'

42.00'42.00'31.93'

5.00'

22.27'

46.58'
101.32'
105.59'

34.00'

7.07'

14.14'98.04'
108.04'
108.04'
108.04'
108.04'
109.04'
112.04'
112.04'
112.04'
112.04'

93.95'

9.23'

46.04'45.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'45.00'34.01'

23.46'45.00'45.00'45.15'45.00'

45.00'

44.00'

45.00' 29.54'

48.81' 42.98' 43.03' 43.03' 43.08' 43.30' 43.03' 126.48'

43.00'43.00'43.00'37.94'

14.01'

7.11'

95.69'
106.00'
105.76'
104.30'
102.82'
100.64'

95.87'

84.98'
GB
1533.00 FS
LP
(1547.0 FS)
E
(1548.0 FS)
(1550.0 FS)
(1548.0 FS)
(1550.0 FS)
(1554.0 FS)

1.0%%%

1.0%%%
1432.0
FS

1.40%%%
1434.0
FS

1.40%%%
1438.0
FS
\A1;30'
\A1;30'\A1;39'
℄
= 4 4 . 9 0
'
1530.17 FS

0.90%%%
200.87'
=
8 9
.
0 1
'

80.16'
= 3 9 .
8 1
'

75.92'
1529.01 FS

1.02%%%

RECREATI
ON
CIRCLE
\pxqc;CALLE DE CABALLOS

WATSON ROAD

VARELA LANE
"D" STREET

BRIGGS ROAD
"F" STREET
"I" STREET
"E" STREET
"H" STREET

VARELA LANE
"C" STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS
"B" STREET
"G" STREET
"A" STREET

42.00'
4 5
. 13
'
3 8
.
9 4
'
3 6
.
4 1
'
4 4
.
0 5
'
36 .
0 0
'
36 .
00 '
3 6 .
0 0
'4 2 .
0 1
'
3 9
.
9 3
'
4 2
. 8 5
'
3 5 .
2 8
'
35 .
01 '
3 5
.
12 '
4 2
.
0 2
'
4 2
.
1 0
'

42.01'
4 2
.
4 2
'

45.05' 45.00'
4 .
6 3
'
45 58
78 83
84 85
86 93
94 95
96 57
56 55
54 5346
47 48
49 51
52 50
79 80
82 81
97 98 99 100
P=1539.3
P=1540.1
P=1541.7
P=1539.3
P=1543.0
P=1541.9
P=1540.9
P=1540.0
P=1543.0
P=1541.9
P=1540.9
P=1540.0
P=1548.8
P=1548.3
P=1547.3
P=1542.3
P=1543.3
P=1544.3
P=1545.3
P=1546.3
P=1542.5
P=1543.5
P=1544.5
P=1545.5
P=1546.5
P=1547.5
P=1548.5
P=1549.0
P=1544.1
P=1545.2
P=1544.1
P=1545.2
P=1540.1
P=1541.2
P=1540.9
P=1541.9
1544.63 GB
1547.10
FS

1.82%2.00%
160' VC
1548.18 PVI
GB
1539.86 FS
F1
F1
F3
F3
10' PRIVATE DRAINAGE

EASEMENT
\A1;56'\A1;28'
\A1;28'\A1;10'\A1;18'\A1;18'
\A1;10'

2.55%%%

98.65'

75.57'

35.52'

44.00' 44.00'
155.42'

10.07'
486.66' 15.05'

42.00'

42.00'

90.00'

42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00'

42.00'42.00'

42.00'

42.00'42.00'27.22'40.29'

90.00'

90.00'
L=3.14'
L=14.84'
= 1. 8 0
'

29.75'

92.00'

92.00'

33.76' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 34.00'

59.50' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 42.00' 43.68'

90.00'

90.00'
= 6 9
. 5
'

24.71'35.00' 42.30' 42.30' 42.30' 42.30' 42.30' 42.30' 42.30' 36.45'

43.45'42.30'42.30'42.30'42.30'42.30'42.30'42.30'50.45'

93.24'

94.49'
= 6 .
0 4
'

31.46'35.00' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 35.88'

54.76' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 42.40' 42.86' = 1.
3 8
'

90.00'

90.00'

57.65' 45.30' 45.30' 45.30' 45.30' 45.30' 45.30' 56.97'

36.07'45.30'45.30'45.30'45.30'45.30'45.30'35.00'27.15'
L=2.40'
L=15.57'
L=2.31'
L=15.66'
123.17'
=
45 .
9 5
'
=
3 3
.
6 5
'

51.95'

95.60'

95.94'
103.58'
104.40'
105.19'
105.97'
106.76'
107.55'
107.11'

44.51'44.51' 44.51' 44.51'

44.51'

44.51'

44.51'

44.51' 44.51'

11.49'

29.50' 42.10' 44.50' 44.50' 44.50' 44.50' 28.90'

42.91'
1540.89 FS
1543.26 PVI

4.63%%%
K K

0.70%%%

70.16' 46.00'
Δ
=
0 2
3 0
'
4 2
"
=
4 3
.
8 4
'
116.05'

19.21'

41.65'

88.46'

6.54'
110.60'

94.35'

91.12'
=
4 .
6 4
'
= 3 3
. 6
'

40.86'
= 16 . 8 1
'
= 13 3
. 3 2
'
= 2 9 4 . 8 6
'
= 16
. 14
'

43.47' = 4 4 .
21 '

43.37'

43.37'

43.37'

42.06'

42.00' 36.06'

10.65'150.06'
3 8
. 5 9
'
102.92'
101.20'

0.70%%%
Δ = 0 3 15
'
3 0
"

75.73' = 3 8
. 2 2
'

30.14'

16.97'

82.90'
101.72'

8.79'
118.00'

21.21'

80.59'

1.0%%%
N89%%D27'12"W

1.89%%%
= 4 2 . 3 8
'

23.00'

80.23' 11.96'
127.96'
331.09'

21.14'

73.02'

14.07'

73.00'

21.28'

9.20' 151.94' 8.49'
= 13 9 .
4 4
'
Δ = 0 9 4 2
'
4 0
"
R = 2 8 5 2 .
0 0
'
= 4 8 3
. 3 9
'

4.40'

6.88' 4.21'
R = 0 0
.
0 0
'
R
=
1 0
0 0
.
0 0
'
R
=
1 0
0 0
.
0 0
'
Δ
=
0 5
0 5
'
5 9
"
R = 5 0 0
. 0 0
'
Δ = 0 5 0 8
'
4 2
"

7.27'
\A1;20'
\A1;20'
\A1;20'

21.21'

11.29'
284.84'
240.99' 4.00'
\A1;20'
LOT 151 L.&S.

LOT 150 L.&S.

LOT 150 L.&S.

20.91'

32.55'

27.48'

1.60%%%
N88%%D15'00"E

79.80'

38.04'
L=4.96'
L=5.76'
=
3 8
.
0 1
'
L=5.55'

62.40'

20.00'

50.00'
=
6 2
.
3 6
'
J1 J1
J2
J2
GP-SP (COM) PA 23B
327-320-020
RAMOLA FARMS NO.5
(MB 014/044-046)
(MB 014/044-046)
4 3
.
1 1
'
PAD
PAD
\A1;PRIVATE LOT\A1;PRIVATE LOT
P/L
%%USECTION "D"-"D"
NTS
%%USECTION "E"-"E"
NTS
PAD
\A1;2'

WATSON ROAD PRIVATE LOT
\A1;9'
\A1;LS
\A1;5'
\A1;SW\A1;LS

2.0%%%
PROP. N'LY R/W
\A1;18'
%%USECTION "K"-"K"
NTS
LOT 63 \A1;LOT 149 EMERGENCY ACCESS
\A1;WIDTH VARIES 27' - 33'
P/L
\A1;20'

ALL WEATHER

PAVED ROAD
(PER FIRE)
PADPAD
LOT 62
P/L

P/L BOUNDARY
TRACT
\A1;8'
\A1;12'12'
WALK
\A1;20'
\A1;2'
\A1;46' OPEN SPACE LOT 152PRIVATE LOT
AND W.Q. BASIN
EXIST. DRAINAGE

ASHLEY CENTER
EXIST. MARION
PAD
%%USECTION "H"-"H"
NTS

2.0%%% MAX
\A1;3'
\A1;6'
\A1;6'
\A1;8'
PAD
\A1;20' LANDSCAPE & SLOPE
\A1;LOT 151
\A1;VARIES
\A1;6'
\A1;S/W
\A1;VARIES
\A1;21'

PRIVATE LOT BRIGGS ROAD
P/L
CF
%%USECTION "I"-"I"
NTS

2.0%%%
PROP. R/W

BOUNDARY
TRACT
\A1;5'
\A1;2'
\A1;VARIES
\A1;LS
\A1;6'
\A1;S/W
\A1;10'

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE
LOT 150
(VARIES 20' TO 40')

E STREET
%%USECTION "J2"-"J2"
NTS
VARIES

2.0%%%
R/W
%%USECTION "G1"-"G1"
NTS
PAD
\A1;2'

PRIVATE LOT

BOUNDARY
TRACT

COMMUNITY CENTER
4'
MAX
EXIST. MARION ASHLEY
%%USECTION "G2"-"G2"
NTS
PAD
\A1;2'

PRIVATE LOT

BOUNDARY
TRACT
EXIST. MARION ASHLEY

COMMUNITY CENTER
%%USECTION "F2"-"F2"
NTS

BOUNDARY
TRACT
EXIST. ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL

G STREET
\A1;LS
\A1;6'
\A1;S/W

2.0%%%
R/W
\A1;5' - 10'
\A1;O.S. LOT 148
VARIES
%%USECTION "F1"-"F1"
NTS
PAD

PRIVATE LOT

BOUNDARY
TRACT
EXIST. MARION ASHLEY

COMMUNITY CENTER

3.5'
MAX
%%USECTION "F3"-"F3"
NTS

BOUNDARY
TRACT
EXIST. ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
PAD

PRIVATE LOT
\A1;10'

DRAINAGE

EASEMENT
(PRIVATE)
%%U SECTION "A"-"A"
NTS
P/L
2:1 MAX.

PAD
\A1;2'

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE
LOT 150
(VARIES 5' TO 36')
\A1;5'
\A1;LS
\A1;6'
\A1;S/W
MALONE AVE. PRIVATE LOT

2.0%%%
%%U SECTION "B"-"B"
NTS
\A1;LS
\A1;6'
\A1;S/W
MALONE AVE. LOT 146
R/W
\A1;2'

2.0%%%
DRAINAGE & W.Q. BASIN
15'

ACCESS ROAD

BASIN BOTTOM
%%USECTION "C"-"C"
NTS
\A1;LS
\A1;6'
\A1;S/W
MALONE AVE.

PRIVATE LOT
R/W
PAD
\A1;2'

2.0%%%
\A1;LS
\A1;OPEN
\A1;SPACE

BOUNDARY
TRACT
\A1;5'
\A1;2'
\A1;VARIES
\A1;LS
\A1;6'
\A1;S/W
\A1;10'

LANDSCAPE & SLOPE
LOT 150
(VARIES 20' TO 40')

E STREET
%%USECTION "J1"-"J1"
NTS
VARIES

2.0%%%
R/W
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38133

CITY OF MENIFEE
LOTS 261, 262, 263, 264, 265 AND A PORTION OF LOT 271 OF ROMOLA NO. 5, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

SCHEDULE "A"

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP

CITY OF MENIFEE
SHEET

OF SHEET
DWG. NO. ____
KO
BM/JS
Checked By:

Scale: AS SHOWN
Drawn By:

REVISIONS

DESCRIPTION APDDATE
REV Engineering, Inc.
357 N. SHERIDAN STREET

ENGINEERINGSURVEYING
SUITE 117
CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92880
TEL. (951) 279-1800
FAX (951) 279-4380
Drawing: R:\\280967\\PA 22 - TTM 38133\\Preliminary\\TTM 38133\\967 - TTM 38133 - 002.dwg Layout: 30x42 L Saved: 10/12/2022 3:38 PM Plotted: 10/12/2022 4:03 PM Plot Scale: 1:2.93 By: Beverly Marinas 2 2
NO. 38133
0 SCALE: 1"=60'
60 120 180 240

LOT NUMBER

EXISTING CONTOUR
LOT 1

EXISTING POWER POLE

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN

EXISTING STORM DRAIN

PROPOSED CONTOUR

RETAINING WALL

PROPOSED SEWER

PROPOSED SEWER FORCE MAIN
{\LLEGEND}

TRACT BOUNDARY
PROP. R/W DEDICATION

PROPOSED PARCEL

EXISTING EASEMENT

PROPOSED WATER
SLOPE (2:1 MAX)

CONCRETE SIDEWALK
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 39

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
392 of 1244

1 10/03/2023

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

COUNTRYSIDE

MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA
PA 22
TTM 38133

NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
PLN21-0273 0-2022
CLIENT:

RICHLAND COMMUNITIES

BRIAN HARDY
[email protected]
949.698.2191
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:

BRIGHTVIEW DESIGN GROUP

WADE GANES
[email protected]
949.238.4900
SHEET INDEX:

TITLE SHEET

REGIONAL AMENITY MAP

OVERALL MAP

PARK ENLARGEMENT

PARKWAY & SLOPE ENLARGEMENT

PLANT PALETTE

ENTRY MONUMENTATION

PARK MONUMENTATION

WALL AND FENCE PLAN

MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT
1 2
3 4
5 6
13 14
15 16
17 TOTAL PROJECT SITE AREA: 26.5 AC LANDSCAPE AREA: 4.7 AC LANDSCAPE % 18% TOTAL CFD MAINTAINED AREA/ OFF-SITE: 15,924 SF TOTAL HOA MAINTAIN AREA / ON-SITE: 190,176 SF TOTAL PRIVATE MAINTAINED AREA: 649,025 SF REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES PER ACRE: 60 PER AC TOTAL TREES PROVIDED: 293 TOTAL STREET TREES REQUIRED (1 PER 30 LF): 25 TOTAL STREET TREES PROVIDED: 28 TOTAL SLOPE LANDSCAPE AREA: 76,814 SF TOTAL SLOPE TREES REQUIRED (1 TREE PER 750 SF): 102 TOTAL SLOPE TREES PROVIDED: 216 TOTAL SHRUBS REQUIRED (1 SHRUB PER 100 SF): 2700 TOTAL SHRUBS PROVIDED: 2700 TURF %: .60% Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 40

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
393 of 1244

10/03/2023
2 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

REGIONAL AMENITY MAP

15 M
ILE R / 20 MINUTE DRIVE
SITE

SANTIAGO
PEAK

TRABUCO
PEAK

ELSINORE

MOUNTAINS

LAKE MATHEWS
MT. RESERVE
LAKE

MATHEWS
PERRIS

RESERVOIR

DIAMOND

VALLEY LAKE

BLACK MOUNTAIN SKINNER

RESERVOIR

SYCAMORE CANYON

WILDERNESS PARK

SAN BERNARDINO NA -

TIONAL FOREST

MT SAN JACINTO STATE
PARK

MICA BUTTE

LAKE VIEW MOUN-
TAINS

SAN JACINTO
DOUBLE

BUTTE WEST
DOUBLE

BUTTE EAST
5 M
ILE R / 10 MINUTE DRIVE
10 M
ILE R / 15 MINUTE DRIVE
TRES

CERRITOS WEST

PERRIS STATE REC -

REATION AREA

SAN JACINTO

MOUNTAINS
LAKE

ELSINORE
KEY
Water Body
Peaks
Park
Amenity

LOS PINOS
PEAK

MENIFEE
NTS
STEELE
PEAK

ESTELLE

MOUNTAIN

MONUMENT

PEAK GAVILAN
PEAK
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 41

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
394 of 1244

10/03/2023
3 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
The site is located north of Highway 74 and is adjacent to Harvest Valley Elementary School and Marion V. Ashley Community Center; providing a host of sports amenities for the residents to utilize. The regional bike trail passes by the eastern edge of the site along Briggs Road promoting alternative connection through the city. The surrounding plant palette is varied and consists of a desert theme at the elementary school (image A), hedge rows and dense tree planting at the northern neighborhood (image B), mixed California adaptive planting around highway 74 (image C) and traditional lawn at the high school (image D). Currently, this community is not in a proposed Community Design Guideline area.

A) HARVEST VALLEY ELEMENTARY

B) NEIGHBORHOOD
C) HIGHWAY 74

D) HERITAGE HIGH SCHOOL

HERITAGE HIGH SCHOOL
• Track Field
• Football Stadium
• Base Ball Diamonds
• Tennis
• Playground
• Baseball Diamond
• Pavilions
• Indoor Gymnasium
• Indoor Classroom
HWY 74

BRIGGS RD

ROMOLAND PUBLIC LIBRARY

HARVEST VALLEY ELEMENTARY
MARION V. ASHLEY

COMMUNITY CENTER

WATSON RD
Regional Bike
Trail
Bike Lane
Highway
KEY

MENIFEE RD

PALOMAR RD

VICINITY MAP
PA 22
NTS
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 42

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
395 of 1244

10/03/2023
4 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
1 2

C STREET

B STREET

A STREETEMERGENCY
ACCESS

WATSON RD

F STREET

G STREET

MALONE AVE

BRIGGS ROAD

I STREET

D STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

E STREET

VARELA LANE
3 HARVEST VALLEY

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
MARION V. ASHLEY

COMMUNITY CENTER
240’
160’
80’
0’
N
3 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
Nestled north of Highway 74, Countryside is an up and
coming vibrant residential community, with homes built for families to set roots. The area is adjacent to the beautiful Full Gospel Prayer Mountain providing a dramatic backdrop to the northeastern edge. Inspired by the natural beauty and rocky outcrops of the mountain top, Countryside’s
proposed entry monumentation creates a welcoming
arrival experience for future residents of the community.

The neighborhood park provides opportunities for play and social gatherings. Water-wise plants adapted to thrive in the Mediterranean climate create spaces with a variety of textures, pops of color, and verdant backdrops.

NOTE:
2 FRONT YARD TREES AND 1 STREET TREE TO BE PROVIDED PER LOT, AS WELL AS 1 TREE PER 750 SQ FT AND 1 SHRUB PER 100 SQ FT FOR ALL REAR SLOPES LEGEND
BASIN

NEIGHBORHOOD P ARK
ENTR Y MONUMENTATION (See sheet 14)

PROPER TY LINE

LIMIT OF W ORK

SEWER LINE

S TORM DRAINS

W ATER LINE

LIGHT POLES

1 2
3 3
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 43

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
396 of 1244

10/03/2023
5 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

C STREET

B STREET

A STREETEMERGENCY
ACCESS

WATSON RD

F STREET

G STREET

MALONE AVE

BRIGGS ROAD

I STREET

D STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

E STREET

VARELA LANE

HARVEST VALLEY

ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
MARION V. ASHLEY

COMMUNITY CENTER
240’
160’
80’
0’
N

PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN
NOTE:

1. 2 FRONT YARD TREES AND 1 STREET TREE TO BE PROVIDED PER LOT, AS WELL AS 1 TREE PER 750 SQ FT FOR ALL REAR SLOPES

2. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES APPROPRIATE TO

LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

3. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET

13. BACK BONE STREET TREE - WATSON STREET

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

BACKBONE STREET TREE - MALONE STREET
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE MYRTLE
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE

BACKBONE STREET TREE - BRIGGS STREET
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE MYRTLE

INTERIOR STREET TREES

F S T - PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

GEIJERA PARVIFLORA - AUSTRALIAN WILLOW

G ST - CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

PODOCARPUS GRACILOR - YEW PINE
E ST - LAGERSTROEMIA ‘NATCHEZ’ - WHITE FLOWERING CREPE MYRTLE

GEIJERA PARVIFLORA - AUSTRALIAN WILLOW

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA- COAST LIVE OAK

G ST - PODOCARPUS GRACILOR - YEW PINE

VALERA LANE- CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

CALLE DE CABALLOS ST- QUERCUS AGRIFOLI A- COAST LIVE OAK

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

GIEJERA PARVIFLORA - AUSTRALIAN WILLOW

PARK TREES
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE MYRTLE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘NANCHEZ’ - WHITE FLOWERING CREPE MYRTLE
PINUS BRUTIA SSP. ELDARICA - AFRICAN PINE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA- COAST LIVE OAK

QUERCUS DOUGLASSII - BLUE OAK

BASIN TREES

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA- COAST LIVE OAK

PARKWAY PLANTING

PARK/OPEN SPACE PLANTING

BASIN PLANTING

HOMEOWNER BACKYARD SLOPE PLANTING
LEGEND
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 44

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
397 of 1244

10/03/2023
6 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

PARK ENLARGEMENT
16’0’
N
BASIN

ACCESSBASIN

D STREET

KEY MAP
NTS

MALONE AVE

A STREET

B STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREET

H STREET G STREET

I STREET

VARELA LANE

E STREET
1’=3/16”

VARELA LANE
The neighborhood park provides a range of
plan and gathering opportunities for residents.

The play area caters to both toddler (2-5) and
school age (5-12) children. The picnic court
provides shade and an intimate space for
birthday parties and play dates to occur. The
flexible lawn provides a space to throw a ball
or Frisbee and functions as a spill over space
for the tot lot.

PARK PLANTING
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

ALOE CAMPERI - POPCORN ALOE

ALOE DAWEI - ORANGE FLAME ALOE

BACCHARIS PILULARIS - COYOTE BUSH
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE AMBITION

GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
ROSEMARY ‘ TUSCAN BLUE’ - ROSEMARY

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE

DODONEA VISCOSA - HOPSEED BUSH
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING

SUNSET LANTANA
LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S

HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE

MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN
DAISY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE

SENECIO VITALIS - NARROW-LEAF CHALKSTICKS

TEUCRIUM X LUCIDRYS - WALL GERMANDER

PARK SCREENING PLANTING
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM

CISTUS X PURUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE

PARK TURF

SEASHORE PASPALUM

HOA PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING

SUNSET LANTANA
LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S

HONEYSUCKLE
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE

MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN
DAISEY

PARK TREES
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE MYRTLE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘NANCHEZ’ - WHITE FLOWERING CREPE MYRTLE
PINUS BRUTIA SSP. ELDARICA - AFRICAN PINE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK

QUERCUS DOUGLASSII - BLUE OAK

PARK PLANTING
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES

APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT

TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 13.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT

REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS

AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT

WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

STREET TREES

G ST - PODOCARPUS GRACILOR - YEW PINE

VALERA LANE- CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON
LEGEND
P ark Monumentation (See sheet 15)
Fle xible Lawn (1,630 SF)
Enhanc ed Planting
2-5 T ot Lot (Resilient surfacing) - P ervious
5- 12 Tot Lot (Resilient surfacing) - Pervious
Picnic c ourt with Grey Matte Metal Shade
Structure
BBQ
Seating
Bik e Rack in Matte Gray
T rash and recycling receptacles
W alk (Natural gray concrete) - Impervious
T ube steel fencing (See Sheet 16)
Drinking F ountain
Split f ace Block Wall (See Sheet 16)
Gate
Mo w curb
HO A Parkway Planting (See Sheet 13)
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 2
4 3
14 15
15 16
1 5
8 6
7 12
9 11
10 13
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 45

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
398 of 1244

10/03/2023
7 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS

HOA OPEN SPACE - SLOPES PLANTING TYPOLOGY

G STREET

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0
NTS

KEY MAP

RESIDENTIAL LOT

RESIDENTIAL LOT
30’
20’
10’
0’
N

HOA PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA SLOPE - SHRUB
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT

BACCHARIS PILULARIS - COYOTE BUSH
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE AMBITION GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE

HOA SLOPE - SCREENING
ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’ - MANZANITA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’

CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA - BAJA FAIRY DUSTER

DODONEA VISCOSA - HOPSEED BUSH

HETEROMELES ARBUTIFOLIA - TOYON

LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS - TEXAS RANGER
ROSEMARY ‘TUSCAN BLUE’ - ROSEMARY
TREES

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

GIEJERA PARVIFLORA - AUSTRALIAN WILLOW

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE
PINUS BRUTIA SSP. ELDARICA - AFRICAN PINE

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

PODOCARPUS GRACILOR - YEW PINE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES APPROPRIATE

TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 13.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT REFLECT

FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS AT PLAN

CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

SLOPE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS PER THE CITY OF MENIFEE.

PLANT MATERIAL–GENERAL

1. A COMBINATION OF SMALLER HERBACEOUS AND/OR PROSTRATE SHRUBBY GROUND COVERS, AND LARGER DEEP–ROOTED SHRUBS AND TREES, SHALL

BE REQUIRED TO PREVENT BOTH SURFACE EROSION AND SLOPE MASS MOVEMENT.

2. LOW WATER USE PLANT MATERIAL APPROPRIATE TO SITE CONDITIONS,

FROM SEED AND
CONTAINER STOCK, SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR SLOPE REVEGETATION.

3. SPECIES THAT GERMINATE QUICKLY AND SPREAD RAPIDLY SHALL BE PLANTED TO PROVIDE QUICK COVER AND PREVENT SURFACE EROSION.

LONG–LIVED, SLOW–GROWING PLANT MATERIAL SHALL ALSO BE UTILIZED TO ENSURE LONG TERM SLOPE STABILITY.

4. GERMINATION OF HYDROSEED SHALL BE REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE.

A. A GERMINA TION RATE OF 90 PERCENT OVERALL, AND 50 PERCENT

C OVERAGE OF SOIL SURFACE, SHALL BE REQUIRED BY THE END OF THE ES TABLISHMENT PERIOD.

B. AFTER ONE YEAR, C OVERAGE OF SOIL SURFACE IN HYDROSEEDED AREA S SHALL BE MINIMUM 90 PERCENT.

PLANTING LEGEND

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
W alkway (DG in California Gold) - Pervious
Block W all atop Retaining Wall (See sheet 16)
Splitw all Block Wall (See sheet 16)
Builder R etaining Wall (See sheet 16)
V inyl Fence (See sheet 16)
ROW
Metal E dging in Gray
1 1
7 2
3 2
3 4
4 5
6 7
6 5
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 46

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
399 of 1244

10/03/2023
8 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS

HOA ENTRY AT CALLE CABALLOS - PARKWAY & SLOPE

PLANTING TYPOLOGY

CALLE DE CABALLOS

RESIDENTIAL LOT

MALONE AVE
30’
20’
10’
0’
N

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
NTS

KEY MAP

CFD PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA SLOPE - SHRUB
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT
ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’
MANZANITA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE AMBITION GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE
TREE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE MYRTLE
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE
VINE

FICUS PUMILA - CREEPING FIG
LONICERA J. HALLIANA - JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE
MACFADYA UNGUIS CATII - CAT’S CLAW VINE
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES

APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT

TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 13.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT

REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS

AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT

WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Side walk (Concrete in Natural Gray Medium Broom) - Impervious Entry Monumenta tion (see sheet 14)
Splitw all Block Wall (See sheet 16)
S treet Light
ROW
Pr operty Line
Mo w Curb
Pilaster
1 1
2 2
3 8
3 4
5 6
7 8
6 5
7 4

PLANTING LEGEND
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 47

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
400 of 1244

10/03/2023
9 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

TYPICAL SLOPE - SLOPE PLANTING TYPOLOGY
30’
20’
10’
0’
N

G STREET

SIGHT LINE

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS

RESIDENTIAL LOT

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
NTS

KEY MAP

HOA PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA SLOPE - SHRUB
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT
ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’
MANZANITA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE AMBITION GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE
TREE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA- COAST LIVE OAK

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

GIEJERA PARVIFLORA - AUSTRALIAN WILLOW
VINE

FICUS PUMILA - CREEPING FIG
LONICERA J. HALLIANA - JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE
MACFADYA UNGUIS CATII - CAT’S CLAW VINE
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES

APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT

TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 13.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT

REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS

AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT

WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Side walk (Concrete in Natural Gray Medium Broom) - Impervious S treet light
Splitw all Block Wall (See sheet 16)
V inyl Fence Atop Retaining Wall (See sheet 16)
ROW
Pilaster
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 6
4 5
6 5

PLANTING LEGEND
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 48

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
401 of 1244

10/03/2023
10 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

CFD WATSON - PARKWAY AND SLOPE PLANTING TYPOLOGY

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS

WATSON RD

RESIDENTIAL LOT
30’
20’
10’
0’
N

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
NTS

KEY MAP

CFD PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

CFD SLOPE - SHRUB
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT
ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’
MANZANITA ‘HOWARD MCMINN’
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM
BOUTELOUA ‘BLONDE AMBITION’ - BLONDE AMBITION GRAMA GRASS

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

CISTANTHE GRANDIFLORA - ROCK PURSLANE

CISTUS X PURPUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE
GREVILLIA ‘NOELII’ - NOEL’S GREVILLEA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA - PINE MUHLY
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE
TREE

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS -DESERT WILLOW

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA - COAST LIVE OAK
VINE

FICUS PUMILA - CREEPING FIG
LONICERA J. HALLIANA - JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE
MACFADYA UNGUIS CATII - CAT’S CLAW VINE
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES

APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT

TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 13.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT

REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS

AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT

WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Side walk (Concrete in Natural Gray Medium Broom) - Impervious S treet light
Splitw all Block Wall (See sheet 16)
Builder R etaining Wall (See sheet 16)
Block W all Atop Retaining Wall (See sheet 16)
V inyl Fence
ROW
Pr operty Line
Pilaster
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 6
7 8
9 8
7 6
5 9

PLANTING LEGEND
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 49

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
402 of 1244

10/03/2023
11 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT
60’
40’
20’
0’
N

HOA BASIN - SLOPE AND PARKWAY PLANTING TYPOLOGY

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
NTS

KEY MAP

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS

MALONE AVENUE

VARELA LANE
D ST

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Side walk (Concrete in Natural Gray Medium Broom) - Impervious S treet light
Basin
Basin F ence and Gate (See sheet 16)
Basin A ccess Ramp (Concrete) - Impervious
Basin A ccess Road (Concrete) - Impervious
ROW
Pr operty Line
Mo w Curb
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 7
8 9
8 9
7 6

CFD PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA BASIN UPLAND SHRUBS
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT

BACCHARIS PILULARIS - COYOTE BUSH
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM

CISTUS X PURUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

SENECIO VITALIS - NARROW-LEAF CHALKSTICKS

TEUCRIUM X LUCIDRYS - WALL GERMANDER
HOA PARK - SHRUB (SEE SHEET 13 FOR PARK TREES AND PLANTING)

BASIN (SEE MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT FOR MAINTENANCE ENTITY)
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE

DODONEA VISCOSA - HOPSEED BUSH
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA

LOBELIA LAXIFLORA - MEXICAN BUSH LOBELIA

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA - RED YUCCA

SALVIA APIANA - WHITE SAGE
BACCHARIS ‘CENTENNIAL’ - DESERT BROOM

CISTUS X PURUREUS - PURPLE ROCKROSE

BASIN TREES

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE

QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA- COAST LIVE OAK

VALERA LANE

CHILOPSIS LINEARIS - DESERT WILLOW

PLATANUS X HISPANICA - LONDON PLANE TREE
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES

APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT

TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 13.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT

REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS

AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT

WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

PLANTING PALETTE
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 50

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
403 of 1244

10/03/2023
12 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

FIRE ACCESS - PARKWAY PLANTING TYPOLOGY

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
NTS

KEY MAP

PARKWAY & SLOPE PLANTING ENLARGEMENTS

MALONE AVENUE
“F” STREET
60’
40’
20’
0’
N

HOA PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

CFD PARKWAY - GROUND COVER

CAREX DIVULSA - BERKELEY SEDGE
LANTANA X ‘SPREADING SUNSET’ - SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA LANTANA X ‘GOLD MOUND’ - GOLD MOUND LANTANA
LONICERA JAPONICA ‘HALLIANA’ - HALL’S HONEYSUCKLE
MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ‘WHITE’ - WHITE MYOPORUM

OSTEOSPERMUM FRUITICOSA - TRAILING AFRICAN DAISEY

HOA PARKWAY - SHRUB
AGAVE ‘BLUE GLOW’ - BLUE GLOW AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA - CENTURY PLANT

BACCHARIS PILULARIS - COYOTE BUSH

CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA - DIAMANTIA

SENECIO VITALIS - NARROW-LEAF CHALKSTICKS

TEUCRIUM X LUCIDRYS - WALL GERMANDER
VINE

FICUS PUMILA - CREEPING FIG
LONICERA J. HALLIANA - JAPANESE HONEYSUCKLE
MACFADYA UNGUIS CATII - CAT’S CLAW VINE
TREE
LAGERSTROEMIA ‘MUSKOGEE’ - LAVENDER CREPE MYRTLE
CERCIDIUM ‘DESERT MUSEUM’ - DESERT MUSEUM PALO VERDE

KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA - GOLDEN RAIN TREE
NOTE:

1. ADDITIONAL DROUGHT-TOLERANT TREE & PLANT SPECIES

APPROPRIATE TO LOCAL CLIMATE MAYBE INCORPORATED AT

TIME OF LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK AND ARE SUBJECT TO CITY
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT’S REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

2. SEE TREE AND PLANTING LEGEND FOR SIZE, WATER USE, AND SPACING ON SHEET 13.

3. ENTITLEMENT CONCEPT, COLORS AND MATERIALS DOES NOT

REFLECT FINAL DESIGN

4. PLANTS WILL BE CHECKED CAREFULLY AT PLAN CHECK FOR

APPROPRIATENESS TO FINAL WIDTH OF PROPOSED PLANTERS

AT PLAN CHECK, PLEASE ONLY PROPOSE PLANT THAT WILL FIT

WITHIN AND ARE APPROPRIATE HEIGHT - WITHOUT REQUIRING
MAINTENANCE TRIMMING.

PLANTING LEGEND

CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
Side walk (Concrete in Natural Gray Medium Broom) - Impervious S treet light
Splitw all Block Wall (See sheet 16)
Emer gency Access
ROW
Pr operty Lines
Mo w Curb
Pilaster
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 5
6 7
8 6
7 5
4 8
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 51

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
404 of 1244

10/03/2023
13 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

PLANT PALETTE
PLANTING NOTES:

1. Plants shall be grouped according to water use factors per WUCOLS zones / compliant with Ordinance 859.3.

2. Turf shall only be used for functional or recreational purposes.

3. This site is not located within 1 mile of MSHCP or environmentally sensitive areas.

4. This site is not located in a high risk fire zone.

5. Slope planting shall be consistent with minimum standards for Building & Safety erosion control standards (Ordinance 457, Section 33361.1).

6. Trees shall be planted at a minimum of 30’ intervals along parkways.

7. No trees shall not be planted in the Tree Exclusion Zone of the County Right-of Way set by Ordinance 461 - Standard 1101.

8. 2 front yard trees and 1 street tree to be provided.

9. Limit natural plant height to 30” within line-of-sight impact areas: drive entries/ parking islands/corners.

10. 3” minimum depth of shredded bark mulch in all planter areas, excluding turf and hydroseed areas.

11. For slopes 3:1 or steeper, permanent ground cover adequately planted with shrubs and/or trees

12. Plant material and mulch suitable for slope use and prevention of surface erosion

13. Plant selection and supporting notes to ensure full slope coverage within 12 months of planting
IRRIGATION NOTES:

1. All areas requiring landscape shall include the installation of a permanent automatic irrigation system. Turf and shrub irrigation systems shall be irrigated separately.

2. Sprinkler heads adjacent to all walkways and areas of pedestrian or vehicular traffic shall be spring retractable types.

3. Pop-up sprinklers shall have matched precipitation rates.

4. All valves shall be wired independently.

5. Irrigation backflow prevention devices and controllers shall be located and/or screened with appropriate plant material to minimize visibility.

6. Detail irrigation plans shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect.

7. Irrigation plans shall be submitted to the appropriate reviewing agencies for approval prior to installation.

8. Irrigation design shall comply with Ordinance 859.3 and the State’s latest Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO).

9. No overhead irrigation shall be within 24” of non-permeable surface.

10. Subsurface or low-volume irrigation shall be used for irregularly shaped areas, or areas less than 10’ in width.

11. All equipment and plans shall conform to recycled water use requirements.

12. All trees to receive dedicated bubbler system.

PLANTING NOTES (Continued):

14. Trees at 1:750 sf, shrubs at 1:100 sf of slope area

15. Plant material to be grouped into compatible hydrozones

16. An agronomic soils analysis and recommendations report shall be included on the plans and provide report with landscape construction document set for plan check.

17. All plants shall be placed so that the mature width will be equal or less than the width of the planter area it is planted within to limit the required amount of trimming and maintenance.

18. Plants will be checked carefully at plan check for appropriateness to final width of proposed planters at plan check, please only propose plant that will fit within and are appropriate height - without requiring maintenance trimming.

Riverside County Ordinance 859 Landscape Water Use Calculations Project Type
(Insert Project Name, Description)

0.50 ETo allowance
Applicant to use drop down menus in cells that indicate a selection to describe each hydrozone.

Where "INPUT" is shown, applicant to enter project specific information.

Please note that embedded formulas will reflect as 'false' or as an error until selections are completed. 1 Maximum Annual Water Allowance (MAWA)
INPUT the total square footage of landscape = 159,020 S.F.

INPUT the Hist. ETo for the area = 57.33
MAWA = 377,828 cu ft / yr
2 Estimated Annual Water Use (EAWU)
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 1 - Park Turf Plant Factor = 0.5 Turf - Recreational Moderate INPUT Square Foot Area of Hydrozone = 1,630
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.75
EAWU = 5,164 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 2 - Park Shrub Plant Factor = 0.5 Shrubs / Groundcover Moderate INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 1,290
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.80
EAWU = 3,831 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 3 - HOA Parkway Plant Factor = 0.2 Shrubs / Groundcover Low INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 91,000
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.80
EAWU = 108,107 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 4 - HOA landscape Plant Factor = 0.5 Shrubs / Groundcover Moderate INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 7,700
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.60
EAWU = 30,492 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 5 -Valley Wide Maint. Plant Factor = 0.2 Shrubs / Groundcover Low INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 57,400
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 0.75
EAWU = 72,737 cu ft / yr
Plant Type Water Use
Hydrozone # 6 Plant Factor = 0 n/a n/a
INPUT square footage of hydrozone = 0
Hydrozone Irrigation Efficiency = 1
EAWU = 0 cu ft / yr
SubTotal EAWU = 220,331 cu ft / yr
Input Irrigation System Operation Factor 0.85
Total EAWU = 259,213
MAWA - EAWU = 118,615 cu ft / yr
(this number must be positive)
PERCENTAGE OF WATER SAVED RELATIVE TO MAX. ALLOWED = 31% * Trees are not required to be listed as a separate hydrozone if understory is planted with plants of an equal or higher plant factor, and foot area is already included in calculations. n/a
Residential
Rotor
In-line Drip-Sparsely Planted
Spray
In-line Drip-Sparsely Planted
Rotor
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 52

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
405 of 1244

10/03/2023
14 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

ENTRY MONUMENTATION
NTS

SIGNAGE ENLARGEMENT
3'-0" 12'-0"
12'-0"
24’
16’
8’
0’
N

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
NTS

KEY MAP
Inspired by the rocky outcrops of The Full Gospel Prayer Mountains, the entry monumentation celebrates the natural beauty and materials of the area. The boulders create a subtle foreground against a metal panel sign with corten steel treatment. A mix of succulents, ornamental grasses and a multi-trunk specimen tree introduces color and
softens the monument sign.
12’-0”
Succulent and
grasses
Boulders
Metal posts with
corten steel
color/treatment
Multi-trunk Palo
Verde
Metal signage wall
with corten steel
color/treatment
4’-6”

CALLE DE CABALLOS

MALONE AVENUE

RIGHT-OF-WAY

PROPERTY LINE
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 53

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
406 of 1244

10/03/2023
15 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

PARK MONUMENTATION
NTS

SIGNAGE ENLARGEMENT
4'-0"
4'-9"
24’
16’
8’
0’
N

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD

B STREET

A STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

C STREET

D STREETBASIN

E STREET

I STREET

BRIGGS ROAD

H STREET

VARELA LANE

MALONE AVENUE

G STREET

WATSON ROAD
SCALE: 1" = 80'-0"
NTS

KEY MAP
The park monumentation is a smaller and simpler version of the entry monumentation, establishing appropriate
hierarchy and continuity between the two.
4’-6”
6’-0”
Metal signage wall
with corten steel
color/treatment

CALLE DE CABALLOS

RIGHT-OF-WAY
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 54

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
407 of 1244

10/03/2023
16 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

WALL AND FENCE PLAN
C
L
F.G.
6' MAX
6'-6" MAX.

ELEVATION

SECTION

SPLIT FACE BLOCK RING BLOCK PILASTER

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL
6" MAX
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

HIGHER LOT

LOWER LOT
VARIES
F.G.

PROPERTY
LINE

ELEVATION

SECTION

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE

BLOCK WALL

VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

HARVEST GLEN AND COUNTRYSIDE - WALL AND FENCE DETAILS

RICHLAND COMMUNITIES

MENIFEE, CA

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
SCALE: 1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE ATOP RETAINING WALL
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
F.G.

WIDE VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
3' MAX
F.G.

C
L
3' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

LOW TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE AT TOT LOT
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
CL
F.G.
6' MAX
6'-6" MAX.

ELEVATION

SECTION

SPLIT FACE BLOCK RING BLOCK PILASTER

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL
6" MAX
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

HIGHER LOT

LOWER LOT
VARIES
F.G.

PROPERTY
LINE

ELEVATION

SECTION

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE

BLOCK WALL

VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

HARVEST GLEN AND COUNTRYSIDE - WALL AND FENCE DETAILS

RICHLAND COMMUNITIES

MENIFEE, CA

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
SCALE: 1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE ATOP RETAINING WALL
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
F.G.

WIDE VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
3' MAX
F.G.

C
L
3' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

LOW TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE AT TOT LOT
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
C
L
F.G.
6' MAX
6'-6" MAX.

ELEVATION

SECTION

SPLIT FACE BLOCK RING BLOCK PILASTER

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL
6" MAX
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

HIGHER LOT

LOWER LOT
VARIES
F.G.

PROPERTY
LINE

ELEVATION

SECTION

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE

BLOCK WALL

VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

HARVEST GLEN AND COUNTRYSIDE - WALL AND FENCE DETAILS

RICHLAND COMMUNITIES

MENIFEE, CA

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
SCALE: 1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE ATOP RETAINING WALL
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
F.G.

WIDE VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL GATE

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
6' MAX
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION
C
L

GATE HANDLE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
6' MAX

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

GATE LATCH

GATE HINGE

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
3' MAX
F.G.

C
L
3' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

LOW TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE AT TOT LOT
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
C
L
F.G.
6' MAX
6'-6" MAX.

ELEVATION

SECTION

SPLIT FACE BLOCK RING BLOCK PILASTER

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL
6" MAX
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

HIGHER LOT

LOWER LOT
VARIES
F.G.

PROPERTY
LINE

ELEVATION

SECTION

PRECISION CONCRETE CAP

SINGLE SIDED SPLIT FACE

BLOCK WALL

VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

HARVEST GLEN AND COUNTRYSIDE - WALL AND FENCE DETAILS

RICHLAND COMMUNITIES

MENIFEE, CA

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
SCALE: 1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE ATOP RETAINING WALL
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
6' MAX.
6' MAX.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
F.G.

WIDE VINYL FENCE

VINYL TOP AND BOTTOM RAIL

VINYL PRIVACY FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL PRIVACY GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

VINYL GATE

CMU COMMUNITY WALL
6' MAX
6' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION
C
L

GATE HANDLE
6' MAX
F.G.

C
L

ELEVATION

SECTION
6' MAX

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

GATE LATCH

GATE HINGE

TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON GATE
SCALE:
1/2"=1'
3' MAX
F.G.

C
L
3' MAX

ELEVATION

SECTION

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON FENCE

TUBULAR STEEL / WROUGHT

IRON RAIL

LOW TUBE STEEL / WROUGHT IRON FENCE AT TOT LOT
SCALE:
1/2"=1'

WALL AND FENCE DETAILS
SYMBOL

DESCRIPTION

VINYL FENCE

SPLITFACE BLOCK WALL

VINYL FENCE ATOP RETAINING WALL

WALL AND FENCE LEGEND

BLOCK WALL ATOP RETAINING WALL

WALL PILASTER

TUBE STEEL/WROUGHT IRON FENCE AND GATE

TUBE STEEL/WROUGHT IRON FENCE AND GATE ATOP RETAINING WALL

TUBE STEEL GATE

BUILDER RETAINING WALL

MONUMENTATION SIGN
240’
160’
80’
0’
N

C STREET

B STREET

A STREET

F STREET

G STREET

H STREET

MALONE AVE

I STREET

D STREET

CALLE DE CABALLOS

WATSON RD

E STREET

VARELA LANE
NOTE:

1. RETURN WALLS AT FRONT OF HOMES AND WALLS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET SHALL BE 6’ HIGH MASONRY / BLOCK WALL.

2. ALL WALLS, FENCES, GATES, PILASTERS AND SIMILAR DESIGNED WITH

MATERIAL AND FINISHES THAT COMPLEMENT PROJECT ARCHITECTURE PER CITY OF MENIFEE STANDARDS FOR MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION.

THESE WILL BE SUBJECT TO FINAL REVIEW BY THE CITY AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PLAN CHECK. FURTHER DETAILING TO BE

CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PHASE FOR FOOTING AND DETAIL ELEMENTS.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 55

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
408 of 1244

10/03/2023
17 COUNTRYSIDE - PA 22 - TTM 38133

OVERALL PRELIMINARY HOA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT

MAINTENANCE EXHIBIT
PERCENTAGE OF TURF AREA : 0.60%
*Tree count is not reflective of the current landscape design SCALE: 1” = 100’
100’ 200’ 300’

MOW CURB REQUIRED BETWEEN

CFD AND HOA MAINTENANCE
AREAS, TYPICAL.

MOW CURB REQUIRED BETWEEN

CFD AND HOA MAINTENANCE
AREAS
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 56

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
409 of 1244

RESOLUTION NO. 24-_________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENIFEE,

CALIFORNIA ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH NO. 1989100207) FOR MENIFEE NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 5 (PLN21-0276), TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38132 (PLN21-0274) AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38133 (PLN21-0272)
WHEREAS, on August 5, 2021, the applicant, Richland Ventures, Inc., filed a formal application with the City of Menifee for the approval of the Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 5 (PLN21-0276), Tentative Tract Map (TTM) No. 38132 (PLN21-0274) and TTM No. 38133 (PLN21-0272); and
WHEREAS, the City is the Lead Agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, collectively, all the applications are referred to as the “Project”; and WHEREAS, the approval of the Project constitutes a discretionary approval, which is part of a “project” as that term is defined in CEQA Guidelines § 15378 and which itself requires review under CEQA; and
WHEREAS, in December of 1994, the County certified a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Technical Studies, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) (attached as Exhibit “B”) (State Clearinghouse No. 1989100207) for the Menifee North Specific Plan No. 260 (SP 260) to analyze and mitigate the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, a previous addendum was prepared and approved by Riverside County in 2004; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed Project, Addendum No. 2 to SP 260 FEIR (herein referred to as the “Addendum”), a copy of which is on file with the Community Development Department and attached as Exhibit “A”, has been prepared pursuant to the provisions of Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in the SP 260 FEIR would result from the proposed Project or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe in connection with the proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the Project was originally scheduled to be heard by the Planning Commission on February 14, 2024; and
WHEREAS, on February 14, 2024 the Planning Commission voted to continue the project to a future Planning Commission Hearing; and
WHEREAS, on March 13, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Menifee held a public hearing on the Project, considered all public testimony as well as all materials in the staff report and accompanying documents for the Project including the consideration of the Addendum to the SP 260 FEIR, which hearing was publicly noticed by a publication in The Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation, an agenda posting, notices placed on the project site, notice Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 57

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
410 of 1244

Menifee North SPA - EIR Addendum
April 17, 2024
4 8
2 7
1 to property owners and non-owner residents within 300 feet of the Project boundaries, notice to all relevant agencies and to persons requesting notification; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has carefully considered all comments received from the public as well as the information provided by City staff regarding environmental review; and
WHEREAS, at the April 3, 2024, City Council voted to continue the project to the April 17, 2024 City Council Hearing; and
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project, considered all public testimony as well as all materials in the staff report and accompanying documents for the Project, which hearing was publicly noticed in The Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation, an agenda posting, on-site posting, notice to property owners within 300 feet of the Project boundaries, and to persons requesting public notice; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Menifee hereby make the following findings as established by CEQA:

Section 1. That the Addendum was prepared for the proposed Project in compliance with the requirements of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines.

Section 2. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in the Addendum, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or negative declaration have occurred; specifically:

1. There have not been any substantial changes in the Project that require major revisions of the SP 260 FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;

2. There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the SP 260 FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and

3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the SP 260 FEIR was certified as complete and adopted, that shows any of the following:
(a) The proposed Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SP 260 FEIR;
(b) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the SP 260 FEIR;
(c) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 58

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
411 of 1244

Menifee North SPA - EIR Addendum
April 17, 2024
4 8
2 7
1 the proposed Project, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or
(d) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SP 260 FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the Project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives.

Section 3. In connection with the proposed Project and this City Council’s review of the Addendum to SP 260 FEIR, this City Council has independently reviewed the Addendum and has exercised its independent judgment in making the findings and determinations set forth herein.

Section 4. Pursuant to the above findings, this City Council determines that the SP 260 FEIR, together with the Addendum, satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the proposed Project and, therefore, hereby approves and adopts the Addendum to the SP 260 FEIR for the proposed Project.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of April, 2024.

Bill Zimmerman, Mayor
Attest:

Stephanie Roseen, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Jeffrey T. Melching, City Attorney
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 59

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
412 of 1244

Menifee North Specific Plan
Amendment No. 5

Addendum to
Environmental Impact Report No. 329

Lead Agency:

City of Menifee
Community Development Department
29844 Haun Road
Menifee, California 92586

Prepared by:

MIG, Inc.
1650 Spruce Street, Suite 106
Riverside, California 92507

Addendum to the EIR
December 18, 2023

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 60

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
413 of 1244

- This document is designed for double-sided printing -

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 61

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
414 of 1244

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 i
City of Menifee
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 1

1.1 – Addendum Analysis ................................ ................................ ................................ . 1

1.2 – Findings ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 2

1.3 – Conclusions ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 3 2 Project Description................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 5

2.1 – Project Title ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 5

2.2 – Lead Agency Name and Address ................................ ................................ ............ 5

2.3 – Contact Person and Phone Number ................................ ................................ ........ 5

2.4 – Menifee North Specific Plan Area and Location ................................ ....................... 5

2.5 – Menifee North Specific Plan Background................................ ................................ . 5

2.6 – General Plan Land Use Designation ................................ ................................ ........ 7

2.7 – Zoning District ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 7

2.8 – Environmental Setting ................................ ................................ ............................. 7

2.9 – Project Description ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 7

2.10 – Required Approvals ................................ ................................ ................................ . 8

2.11 – Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required ................................ .................. 8 3 Determination ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 19

3.1 – Environmental Categories Potentially Affected ................................ ...................... 19

3.2 – Determination ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 19 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ................................ ................................ ..................... 21

4.1 – Aesthetics ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 23

4.2 – Agriculture and Forest Resources ................................ ................................ ......... 27

4.3 – Air Quality ................................ ................................ ................................ .............. 31

4.4 – Biological Resources ................................ ................................ ............................. 36

4.5 – Cultural Resources ................................ ................................ ................................ 40

4.6 – Energy ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 44

4.7 – Geology and Soils ................................ ................................ ................................ . 47

4.8 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................ ................................ .................. 53

4.9 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials................................ ................................ ......... 57

4.10 – Hydrology and Water Quality ................................ ................................ ................. 62

4.11 – Land Use and Planning ................................ ................................ ......................... 71

4.12 – Mineral Resources ................................ ................................ ................................ 73

4.13 – Noise ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 75

4.14 – Population and Housing ................................ ................................ ........................ 78

4.16 – Public Services ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 80

4.18 – Recreation ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 85

4.19 – Transportation ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 88

4.20 – Tribal Cultural Resources ................................ ................................ ...................... 94

4.21 – Utilities and Service Systems ................................ ................................ ................ 97

4.22 – Wildfire ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 106

4.23 – Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................ ................................ ..... 109 5 Applicable Mitigation ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 111 6 References ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 119

6.1 – List of Preparers ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 119

6.2 – Persons and Organizations Consulted ................................ ................................ 120

6.3 – Bibliography ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 121

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 62

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
415 of 1244

Table of Contents
ii Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
List of Tables
Table 1 EIR No. 329 Approved Emissions from Construction Equipment ................................ . 32 Table 2 EIR No. 329 Approved Operational Emissions ................................ ............................. 32 Table 3 Emissions from Cumulative VMT ................................ ................................ ................. 34 Table 4 Project Generated VMT ................................ ................................ ............................... 91 Table 5 Project Effect on VMT ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 91

List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1 Regional Context Map ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 9 Exhibit 2 Specific Plan Area Map ................................ ................................ .............................. 11 Exhibit 3 Tentative Tract Maps ................................ ................................ ................................ . 13 Exhibit 4 Approved and Proposed Land Use Maps ................................ ................................ ... 17

Appendices
Appendix A Environmental Impact Report No. 329
Appendix B Trip Generation, Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Supplemental Memorandum Appendix C Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analyses Appendix D Cultural Resources Studies
Appendix E Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluations
Appendix F Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
Appendix G VMT Analysis
Appendix H Hydraulic Analysis Reports
Appendix I Tribal Consultation Letters

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 63

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
416 of 1244

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 1
City of Menifee
1 Introduction

This Addendum, its appendices, and related supporting environmental documents have been prepared to determine whether and to what extent the City of Menifee’s (“City”) Environmental Impact Report (“EIR No. 329” or “PEIR”, Clearinghouse No. 1989100207) prepared for the Menifee North Specific Plan (See Appendix A) remains sufficient to address the potential impacts of the proposed Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 (“proposed Project” or “Project”), or whether additional documentation (e.g., a subseq uent EIR) is required under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) (Pub.

Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq.). EIR No. 329 was approved for the Menifee North Specific Plan in March 1993 and concluded that all potentially significant impacts associated with the Specific Plan would be less than significant with incorporation of mitigation. A General Plan Amendment was requested and approved as part of the process for adoption of the Specific Plan in 1993 by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors (prior to City incorporation). The Specific Plan area included 1,439 acres and 2,990 dwelling units, 156 acres of business park use, 91 acres of commercial use, 197 acres industrial use, and 143 acres or parks and open space. The Specific Plan has been amended four times since the 1993 PEIR was approved; the most recent being in June 2020. The Project includes Tentative Tract Map (“TTM”) 38132, TTM 38133, and Specific Plan Amendment No. PLN21-0276. The City of Menifee is the Lead Agency for the proposed Project under CEQA.

1.1 – Addendum Analysis
This Addendum has been prepared pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15164, and 15168(c). This Addendum evaluates the Project’s potential environmental effects in light of those effects previously disclosed in EIR No. 329 to determine whether any of the conditions described in Guidelines Section 15162 calling for subsequent CEQA review have occurred. EIR No. 329 is available for review at the City’s Community Development Department, 29844 Haun Road, Menifee, Ca lifornia 92586. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) provides that the lead agency “shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Subsection (c) further provides that an “addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the final EI R,” and subsection (e) states that a “brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included” in the addendum, the agency’s findings, or elsewhere in the administrative record.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(2) provides that “if the agency finds that pursuant to Section 15162, no subsequent EIR will be required, the agency can approve the activity as being within the scope of the project covered by the Program EIR” and that “[w]hether a later activity is within the scope of a Program EIR is a factual question that the lead agency determines based on substantial evidence in the record.” Subsection (c)(4) further provides that “[w]here the later activities involve site -specific operations, the agency should use a written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects of the operation were within the scope of the Program EIR.”

Finally, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (cross referenced by Sections 15164 and 15168) provides that

(a) When an EIR has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 64

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
417 of 1244

1 – Introduction
2 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;1
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:

(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

Per the above, this Addendum functions as both an “addendum” and a “written checklist,” as called for in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15164(a) and 15168(c)(4). As such, this Addendum analyzes the proposed Project’s potential environmental effects in light of those effects disclosed in EIR No. 329 consistent with Guidelines Section 15162. As detailed in this Addendum, no further CEQA review is required for the proposed Project beyond EIR No. 329 and this Addendum because (1) the Project will not have new or subs tantially more severe impacts than what was disclosed in EIR No. 329 , (2) all applicable mitigation measures in EIR No. 329 will be incorporated into the Project’s approval, and (3) the Project will not require any new mitigation measures. This Addendum and its supporting documents constitute substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR or ND is not required prior to approval of the Project.

1.2 – Findings
The proposed Project reflects minor changes and additions to the project described in the certified PEIR. There are no substantial changes resulting from the proposed Project or in the circumstances in which the Project will be undertaken that require major revisions of EIR No. 329. The proposed Project does not require preparation of a new subsequent or supplemental EIR, due to either the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified

1 CEQA Guidelines Section 15382 defines “significant effect on the environment” as “... a substantial, or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project, including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic or aesthetic significance...” (se e also Public Resources Code [PRC], Section 21068).

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 65

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
418 of 1244

1 – Introduction

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 3
City of Menifee
significant effects. As illustrated herein, the proposed Project is consistent with EIR No. 329 and would involve only minor changes; therefore, an Addendum is appropriate CEQA compliance for the proposed Project.

1.3 – Conclusions
The City of Menifee may approve the proposed Project based on this Addendum. The impacts of the proposed Project remain within the impacts previously analyzed in EIR No. 329 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15164). The proposed Project does not require any major revisions to EIR No. 329. No new significant information or changes in circumstances surrounding the proposed Project have occurred since the certification of EIR No. 329. Therefore, the previous CEQA analyses completed for the certified PEIR remain adequate. The applicable mitigation measures and/or conditions of approval from EIR No. 329 would be imposed on the proposed Project as described herein.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 66

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
419 of 1244

1 – Introduction
4 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 67

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
420 of 1244

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 5
City of Menifee
2 Project Description

2.1 – Project Title
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5

2.2 – Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Menifee
Community Development Department
29844 Haun Road
Menifee, California 92586

2.3 – Contact Person and Phone Number
Brandon Cleary, Associate Planner
951-723-3761

2.4 – Menifee North Specific Plan Area and Location
The City of Menifee is located in western Riverside County, approximately 30 miles southeast of the City of Riverside, and is bound by Perris to the north, Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore to the west, Wildomar and Murrieta to the south, and the community of Winchester to the east (See Exhibit 1, Regional Context Map). The Menifee North Specific Plan area is located in the northeastern portion of Menifee Valley, just one mile east of Sun City (See Exhibit 2, Specific Plan Area Map), in the City of Menifee, Riverside County, California. The Planning Area is located immediately east of Interstate 215 (I-215) and approximately 4 miles west of Diamond Valley Lake. Tract 38132, which is within Planning Area 9 (PA-9) of the of the Specific Plan area, is located at the northeast corner of Palomar Road and Cider Street (APNs: 329-100-003 & 329-100-010) and Tract 38133, which is within PA-22 and PA-23A of the Specific Plan area, is located at the southwest corner of Watson Road and Malone Avenue (APNs: 327 -3230-001, 327-320-014, 327 -320-015,327-320-017, & 327 -320-018) (See Exhibit 3, Tentative Tract Maps).

• Cross Streets: Palomar Road and Cider Street/ Watson Road and Malone Avenue • Latitude 33° 44’ 53.18” North, Longitude 117° 09’ 38.28” West/ Latitude 33° 44’ 52.92” North, Longitude 117° 08’ 23.78” West
• APNs: 327-320-001, 327-320-014, 327-320-015, 327-320-017, 327-320-018, 329-100-003, & 329-100-010

2.5 – Menifee North Specific Plan Background
In 1993, the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approved the Menifee North Specific Plan No. 260 and certified its’ Environmental Impact Report (“EIR No. 329” or “PEIR”). The adopted Specific Plan provided for the development of 2,390 residential units on 1,635.3 acres between the communities of Homeland and Romoland in southwestern Riverside County. The adopted Specific Plan also included areas with Commercial, Business Park, and Commercial/Business Park uses . EIR No. 329 was intended to serve as the Master Environmental Document for the Menifee North Specific Plan and all subsequent development projects undertaken pursuant to and within the Specific Plan boundaries. EIR Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 68

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
421 of 1244

2 – Project Description
6 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
No. 329 analyzed 2,654 dwelling units, although the plan was approved for only 2,390 units. To date, the Specific Plan has been amended four times as described below.

• Amendment No. 1: In 2004, Amendment No. 1 and its accompanying Addendum was approved by the County of Riverside, which increased the number of residential units to 2,602 and deleted Planning Area 1, which was originally designated for 18 acres of Commercial/Business Park use, to reflect its annexation into the City of Perris. A portion of commercial land uses were eliminated to allow for additional residential and Planning Area 32 was re -designated Medium High Density Residential from Medium Density Residential. • Amendment No. 2: In 2008, Amendment No. 2 and Environmental Assessment No. 40275 was approved by the County of Riverside. Amendment No. 2 reduced the Specific Plan acreage by approximately 30 acres (from 1,635.3 acres to 1,604.6 acres), increased the number of residential units by 213 units (from 2,602 to 2,815), modified the Land Use Designations and unit counts in Planning Areas 7, 8, 10, 20, 23, and 48, and modified the Circulation Plan to reflect the Circulation Element of the Riverside County General P lan adopted in 2003. The City of Menifee was also incorporated in 2008 and establishment of the City’s boundary at Briggs Road resulted in the approximately 775-acre portion of the adopted Specific Plan, west of Briggs Road, remaining within the City’s jurisdiction.
• Substantial Conformance No. 1: In January 2016, Substantial Conformance No. 1 to Amendment No. 2 (SP260A2-SC1) was approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors to modify the Specific Plan boundary and removed all areas west of Briggs Road from the Menifee North Specific Plan. The revised limits of the Menifee North Specific Plan were reduced to approximately 829.2 acres east of Briggs Road, west of Juniper Flats Road, south of Alicante Drive, and north of Matthews Road, continuing to allow for a wide range of land uses includin g 2,025 residential units. The balance of 816.2 acres and 889 residential dwelling units resided within the City of Menifee.
• Substantial Conformance No. 2: On March 17, 2020, Substantial Conformance No. 2 to the Menifee North Specific Plan (SP260A2-SC2) was adopted to modify Planning Areas 24, 25, 26 and 28 boundaries, acreages, and residential dwelling unit counts to reflect approved Tentative Tract Map No. 29322 and proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 37533, which were processe d concurrently. SP260A2 -SC2 maintained the approved maximum of 2,025 residential units permitted on 829.2 acres, and reduced the minimum lot sizes within Pl anning Area 25 from 6,000 square feet to 3,500 square feet; re-allocated 22 dwelling units from Planning Areas 26 and 28 (TTM 29322) to Planning Areas 24 and 25 (10 dwelling units and 12 dwelling units respectively) to be consistent with TTM 37533; revised the locations of the water quality basins and mini-park sites within Planning Areas 24, 25, 26, and 28; and reduced the overall acreage of major roads within the overall SP area from 77.1 acres to 74.8 acres in the Specific Plan text and graphics. SP260A2-SC2 also included a technical correction for the land use designations of Planning Areas 26 and 28, from “Medium -High Density Residential” to “Medium Density Residential”, so that the designations would be consistent with previously approved TM 29322. • Amendment No. 3: On July 1, 2020, Amendment No. 3 to the Menifee North Specific Plan and its accompanying EIR (SCH #2019029123) was adopted by the City of Menifee. Amendment No. 3 modified Planning Areas 11, 12, 13, and 14 and formally removed those portions of the Specific Plan outside the City boundaries from the document, however a final comprehensive document reflecting the approved modifications was not created. • Amendment No. 4: In 2022, Amendment No. 4 to the Menifee North Specific Plan and its accompanying EIR (SCH #2021060247) was approved to modify the boundary and increase the acreage Planning Area 2 from 138.8 acres to 145.2 acres, to reflect TTM 38156.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 69

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
422 of 1244

2 – Project Description

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 7
City of Menifee

2.6 – General Plan Land Use Designation
Menifee North Specific Plan

2.7 – Zoning District
PA-9 (MDR)/ PA-22 (MHDR) & PA-23A (HDR)

2.8 – Environmental Setting
Menifee North is a master planned community, and infrastructure and other public facilities have been sufficiently sized to meet the needs of the entire community at full build-out. The Specific Plan area was proposed for urbanization in the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan, representing a logical extension of development into an area where utilities were available. The Planning Area was utilized for agriculture before development of the Specific Plan, and archeological and historical resources i n the area have most likely been disturbed as a result. Menifee North is an internally oriented, self - contained community that combines residential, commercial, business park, industrial, parks, and open space uses. The area is relatively flat and slopes slightly from northwest to southeast with an elevation ranging between approximately 1,400 and 1,600 feet above mean sea level (AMSL). The proposed Project site is vacant and contains limited vegetation and shrubs. There are no trees on the Project site.

Much of the drainage in the vicinity of the Project site has been channelized, but historically, the drainage pattern has been in a westerly direction toward Perris Valley and ultimately, the San Jacinto River. For the most part, stormwater flows are intermittent, occurring only as the result of seasonal precipitation.

2.9 – Project Description
The proposed Project includes Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map (“TTM”) No. 38132, and No. TTM 38133. Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 proposes to amend the Menifee North Specific Plan No. 260 by modifying the acreage, unit count, density, and designation of Planning Area 9 (PA-9) and modifying the Planning Area boundary, acreage unit count, density, and designation of PA -22 (See Exhibi t 4, Approved and Proposed Land Use Map s). The proposed Project represents Amendment No. 5 of the approved Menifee North Specific Plan. The purpose of Amendment No. 5 is to modify the uses, configuration , development standards , unit counts, densities, and Land Use Designations of PA-9, PA-22, and PA-23A.

The amendment to PA-9 will establish: a designation of Medium High Density Residential Zone on a

29.4 acre property at 5.8 dwelling units per acre yielding 170 allowed dwelling units and a minimum lot size of 4,300 square feet.

The amendment to PA-22 include: consolidat ion of PA-22 and PA -23A into one residential planning area (PA-22); and establishes designation of Medium High Density Residential on a 26.5 acre property at 5.5 dwelling units per acre, yielding 145 allowed dwelling units.

TTM 38132 (PA-9) proposes a subdivision of 29.4 gross acres into 169 residential lots, five (5) open space lots, and a water quality basin. The subdivision would have a proposed density of 5.8 du/ac.

TTM 38133 (PA-22) proposes a subdivision of 26.5 gross acres into 145 residential lots, six (6) open space lots, and a water quality basin. The subdivision would have a proposed density of 5.5 du/ac.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 70

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
423 of 1244

2 – Project Description
8 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
Lastly, the proposed Project includes revisions to the Zoning Ordinance text of the Specific Plan to reflect the proposed Project.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not result in any reductions to the number of allowed dwelling units within the two Planning Areas (from 315 allowed as currently approved and 315 with proposed SPA No. 5).

Required Approvals
The Project would require the following approvals:

• Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) No. 5
• Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 38132
• Tentative Tract Map (TTM) 38133

2.10 – Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required
• None

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 71

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
424 of 1244

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 9
City of Menifee
Exhibit 1
Regional Context Map

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 72

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
425 of 1244

2 – Project Description
10 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 73

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
426 of 1244

2 – Project Description

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 11
City of Menifee
Exhibit 2
Specific Plan Area Map

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 74

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
427 of 1244

2 – Project Description
12 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 75

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
428 of 1244

2 – Project Description

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 13
City of Menifee
Exhibit 3
Tentative Tract Maps

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 76

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
429 of 1244

2 – Project Description
14 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 77

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
430 of 1244

2 – Project Description

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 15
City of Menifee

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 78

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
431 of 1244

2 – Project Description
16 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 79

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
432 of 1244

2 – Project Description
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 17
City of Menifee

Exhibit 4
Approved and Proposed Land Use Maps

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 80

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
433 of 1244

2 – Project Description
18 Addendum to the EIR
September 5, 2023

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 81

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
434 of 1244

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 19
City of Menifee
3 Determination

3.1 – Environmental Categories Potentially Affected
The environmental categories checked below were identified in EIR No. 329 as being a ‘Potentially Significant Impact ,’ and the following sections of this Addendum will identify to what degree the proposed Project contributes to these previously identified significant impacts.

Aesthetics □ Agriculture Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology /Soils □
Greenhouse Gas
Emissions □
Hazards & Hazardous
Materials

Hydrology / Water
Quality □ Land Use / Planning □ Mineral Resources
Noise □ Population / Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation/Traffic
Tribal Cultural
Resources
□
Utilities / Service
Systems □ Wildfire □
Mandatory Findings of
Significance

3.2 – Determination
□

The Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
□

Although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. □

The Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
□

The Project MAY have a ‘potentially significant impact’ or ‘potentially significant unless mitigated’ impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.

The Project could have a significant effect on the environment , but all of its potentially significant effects (a) have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION. As such, no further environmental documentation (e.g., a subsequent EIR) is required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 82

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
435 of 1244

3 – Determination
20 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 83

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
436 of 1244

Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 21
City of Menifee
4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts

The purpose of this Addendum is to evaluate the CEQA environmental checklist categories in terms of any changed conditions from the approved PEIR (EIR No. 329), including any subsequent addendums, to the proposed Project (e.g., project changes, changed circumstances, or new information of substantial importance) that may produce a changed environmental result (e.g., a new significant impact or substantial increase in the severity of a previously id entified significant effect) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15164, and 15168(c). As such, the Addendum’s checklist analysis uses the standard environmental categories provided in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines but provides answer columns for evaluation consistent with the considerations listed in Guidelines Section 15162(a).

Mitigation measures identified in EIR No. 329 and applicable to the proposed Project are discussed under each environmental section and are listed in Section 5 – Applicable Mitigation Measures. As discussed in the following sections, the proposed Project would n ot result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of impacts previously identified by EIR No. 329.

EXPLANATION OF CHECKLIST EVALUATION CATEGORIES (COLUMNS)

Effect Not Examined in Program EIR?

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(1), this column indicates whether the Project would have effects that were not previously examined by EIR No. 329, in which new effects could necessitate subsequent CEQA review. EIR No. 329 is nearly thirty years old ; therefore, there are several impact areas that were not examined as part of the original environmental analysis. Since 1994, the CEQA Guidelines have been updated numerous times requiring analysis of several new impact areas that were not included in EIR No. 329.

Significance Conclusion in Program EIR?

This column identifies the conclusion of EIR No. 329 concerning the environmental issue listed under each topic with respect to its significance.

Proposed Changes Involving New or More Severe Impacts?

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(1), this column indicates whether any changes represented by the proposed Project will result in new significant environmental impacts not previously identified or mitigated by EIR No. 329or whether the changes will result in a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact.

New Circumstances Involving New or More Severe Impacts?

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(2), this column indicates whether there have been substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to EIR No. 329 due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 84

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
437 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
22 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
New Information Showing New or More Severe Impacts?

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3), this column indicates whether new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time EIR No. 329 was certified, shows any of the following:

(A) The Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration;

(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous PEIR;

(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or

(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous PEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the Project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

If the additional analysis completed as part of this environmental review were to find that the conclusions of EIR No. 329 remain the same and no new significant impacts are identified, or identified impacts are not found to be substantially more severe, or additional mitigation is not necessary, then the question would be answered “No,” and no subsequent environmental review would be required.

DISCUSSION FOLLOWING CHECKLIST EVALUATION

A discussion of the elements of the checklist is provided under each environmental category in order to clarify the answers regarding the proposed Project in relation to EIR No. 329. The discussion provides information about the particular environmental issue, how the Project relates to the issue, and the status of any mitigation that may be required or that has already been implemented. Applicable mitigation measures from EIR No. 329 that apply to the proposed Project are listed under each environmental category.

Conclusion

Each section ends with a summary of the conclusion of the preceding analysis.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 85

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
438 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 23
City of Menifee

4.1 – Aesthetics
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined in
EIR No. 329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect on a scenic
vista?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
b) Substantially damage
scenic resources,
including, but not limited to,
trees, rock outcroppings,
and historic buildings within
view from a state scenic
highway?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
c) In non-urbanized area,
substantially degrade the
existing visual character or
quality of public views of
the site and its
surroundings? (Public
views are those that are
experienced from publicly
accessible vantage point).

If the project is in an
urbanized area, would the
project conflict with
applicable zoning and
other regulations governing
scenic quality?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
d) Create a new source of
substantial light or glare
which would adversely
affect day or nighttime
views in the area?
Yes
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
No No No

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Scenic Vistas. The Canyon Lake Reservoir lies adjacent to the west City boundary. EIR No. 329 noted that the Planning Area does not contain any outstanding scenic vistas which require preservation, which would eliminate the need for interpretive displays. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined the Menifee North Specific Plan would have less than significant impacts and no mitigation was required.

The proposed Project includes modifications to the acreage, unit count, density, and designation of PA- 9 and modifications to the Planning Area boundary, acreage unit count, density, and designation of PA -22. The Project would result in a net decrease in the number of built residential units within the Specific Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 86

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
439 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
24 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
Plan Area, and because the Planning Area does not contain any outstanding scenic vistas, Amendment #5 would not result in a change to the number of allowed residential units. Therefore, the proposed Project would have similar less-than-significant impacts to scenic vistas.

(b) Visual Resources within a State Scenic Highway. EIR No. 329 noted that approximately 306.8 acres of the Menifee North Specific Plan borders Highway 74, an Eligible State Scenic Highway. EIR No. 329 also noted that the entire 306.8 acres is contained within Specific Plan Planning Areas proposed for Commercial, Business Park, and combined Commercial/Business Park land uses.

However, EIR No. 329 found that the Menifee North Specific Plan is intended to mitigate any potential impacts to Highway 74 through implementation of landscaping, that would delineate the community boundary and act as a noise barrier . Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts to scenic resources within view from a state scenic highway would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

There are no officially designated scenic highways in or near the City of Menifee. State Route 74 (SR- 74) passes along the southern boundary of the Planning Area and is considered an “Eligible State Scenic Highway – Not Officially Designated” by the California Department of Transportation. The nearest designated state scenic highway to the City is a portion of SR-74 in the San Jacinto Mountains about 17 miles east of the City (Caltrans, 2010). However, because none of these resources are located within the Specific Plan area, the proposed Project would have similar less-than-significant impacts on scenic resources.

(c) Degrade Existing Visual Character. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts to the existing visual character of the sites and surrounding area because it was not required by CEQA when EIR No. 329 was certified in 1993 . However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about aesthetics impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to degradation of the visual character of the area was readily available to the public.

Today the Specific Plan area is mostly built out with a combination of residential and supportive commercial uses . The proposed Project would be developed consistent with the design and development requirements of the Specific Plan. The size and scale of the proposed buildings would be consistent with existing development in the surrounding area. The Project would not develop any hillside areas. The overall appearance of new buildings within the Project would be consistent with the scale and size allowed un der the Specific Plan with applicable specific plan s and zoning requirements.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality and would have less than significant impacts. No mitigation is required.

(d) Light and Glare. EIR No. 329 found that the development of up to 2,654 residential units and 599.3 acres of commercial, business park, and industrial use would result in the installation of streetlights as required by Riverside County. Entry monumentation and signage may also require illumination. EIR No. 329 found that these lighting requirements could potentially result in a condition known as "skyglow" which interferes with the use of the telescope at the Palomar Observatory. As such, mitigation was incorporated requiring use of low -pressure sodium vapor lamps for street lighting, orientation and shielding of light to prevent direct upward illumination, and compliance with County Ordinance No. 655 regulating light pollution. With incorporation of these mitigation measures, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts related to light and glare would be less than significant.

The proposed Project would require the installation of street lighting. Sources of light and glare in the Specific Plan area include building lights ( interior and exterior), security lights, sign illumination, and Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 87

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
440 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 25
City of Menifee
parking-area lighting. Other sources of nighttime light and glare include street lights and vehicular traffic along roadways. Menifee’s night skies benefit from being surrounded by uses that emit little or no light:
open space lands, vacant land, farmland, and rural residential development. In addition, land uses that generate significant amounts of light pollution, such as shopping centers, are limited and concentrated in limited areas in the City. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the City of Menifee Municipal Code Chapter 9.210 (Lighting Standards), which requires exterior lighting to be minimized to prevent glare and minimize reflected, ambient light so as to maintain visibility of the night skies. Chapter

9.210 also requires all exterior lighting to be shielded as to avoid light spillover on adjacent properties.

Therefore, compliance with existing regulations , including EIR No. 329 mitigation measures, would ensure the proposed Project’s light and glare impacts would be less than significant and no new mitigation is required.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-D.11.1 Because of the property’s location with respect to Palomar Observatory, low -pressure sodium vapor lamps for street lighting will be used.

MM-D.11.2 Other potentially lighted areas (i.e., entry monumentation, commercial, business, and industrial signage) shall orient and shield light to prevent direct upward illumination.

MM-D.11.3 The project will be subject to County Ordinance No. 655 regulating light pollution.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan is located within an area undergoing rapid urbanization as a result of demand pressures for housing, as is occurring in most of Riverside County, and that a number of other major projects were pending in the project area at the time of certification.

EIR No. 329 also noted that including the Menifee North Specific Plan, the other major developments in the area cumulatively propose d approximately 32,500 dwelling units, generating an estimated population of 84,175 persons. In addition to the residential elements of these projects, EIR No. 329 found that these projects include d an estimated total of 850 acres of Town Center, Commercial, Business Park and/or Industrial use. EIR No. 329 found that t he 2,654 units proposed by the Menifee North Specific Plan constitute 8.2% of the total dwelling units proposed and approved in the City. While the individual projects may contribute marginally to growth in the area, EIR No. 329 determined that the collective projects would cumulatively create an overall change in the once rural and sparsely populated nature of the Sun City/Menifee Valley and Romoland/Homeland region. EIR No. 329 also determined that the overall increase in units and related demands along neighborhood roads and for local services and utilities would cumulatively impact the area. In addition, the development of these projects in what was once a semi-rural/ agricultural but steadily developing area could result in conversion of adjoining lands to similar uses, particularly agricultural and open space uses remaining in the area. Therefore, ultimate urbanization of the project vicinity could potentially indirectly influence exp ansion throughout the area. However, EIR No. 329 determined that cumulative projects constructed within the Specific Plan area and conforming to County General Plan and zoning designations would have impacts anticipated by the General Plan EIR, and would not create adverse cumulative impacts to aesthetic resources.

The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project site with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 88

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
441 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
26 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
City’s zoning code lighting standards relating to light and glare . Therefore, the cumulative aesthetic impact from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Conclusion

As analyzed in EIR No. 329, the proposed Project would comply with the City’s night-time light regulation and would thus have less than significant impacts . The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 89

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
442 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 27
City of Menifee

4.2 – Agriculture and Forest Resources
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dep artment of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the State’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board.

Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Convert Prime Farmland,
Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
Yes
Significant
Unavoidable
Impact
No No No
b) Conflict with existing
zoning for agricultural use, or
a Williamson Act contract?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
c) Conflict with existing
zoning for, or cause rezoning
of, forest land (as defined in
Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)), timberland
(as defined by Public
Resources Code section
4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as
defined by Government Code
section 51104 (g))?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
d) Result in loss of forest
land or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
e) Involve other changes in
the existing environment
which, due to their location or
nature, could result in
Yes
Significant
Unavoidable
Impact
No No No
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 90

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
443 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
28 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
conversion of Farmland to
non-agricultural use or
conversion of forest land to
non-forest use?

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Designated Farmland. EIR No. 329 which was certified in 1993 noted that implementation of the Menifee North Specific Plan would remove from use an estimated 1,050 acres of farmable land used for the production of oat/hay, alfalfa, wheat, potatoes, barley, and grain, and further contribute to the decline of such uses in Riverside County. With the exception of the 112.0 acres of natural open space proposed within the southeastern portion of the Planning Area and the 80.8 acres of parks, EIR No. 329 found that project development would eliminate existing open space and the rural atmosphere currently present on-site, and Project approval would constitute continuation of the trend towards a commitment to urban development in the area, as embodied by the proposed Menifee Ranch and Menifee Estates Specific Plans to the south, the approved Menifee Village Specific Plan which is south of Menifee Ranch, and the proposed Menifee East Specific Plan which is southeast of Menifee Village. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determi ned that Project implementation would result in urban development on "Prime" soils, and loss of Prime soils was considered a significant impact of project development. However, no mitigation measures were proposed for the discontinuance of farming on -site and the loss of Prime Farmlands.

The Specific Plan area is rapidly urbanizing and the proposed Project is within the scope of what was proposed in the original Specific Plan. Specific Plan Planning Areas 9, 22, and 23A do not contain any lands designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance as mapped by the State Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. The Project has no potential to convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non‐agricultural use and no impact would occur in this regard.

(b) Williamson Act. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to Williamson Act contracts. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about agricultural and forest resources impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects to Williamson Act lands was readily available to the public.

According to the Riverside County Parcel Report for the Project, the site is not under a Williamson Act Contract. The site is designated as Specific Plan in the City’s General Plan. There is no agricultural zoning or uses within the Specific Plan area and the Project is within the scope of the original Specific Plan. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract.

(c) Forest Zoning. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to forest zoning. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about agricultural and forest resources impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to forest zoning was readily available to the public.

The current General Plan land use designation for the site is Specific Plan . The Project site does not contain any forest lands, timberland, or timberland zoned as Timberland Production, nor are any forest lands or timberlands located on or nearby the Project site. Because no lands on the Project site are Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 91

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
444 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 29
City of Menifee
zoned for forestland or timberland, the Project has no potential to impact such zoning. No impact would occur.

(d) Loss of Forestland. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to loss of forestland. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about agricultural and forest resources impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to loss of forestland was readily available to the public.

The Project site and surrounding properties do not contain forest lands, are not zoned for forest lands, nor are they identified as containing forest resources by the General Plan. Because forest land is not present on the Project site or in the immediate vicinity of the Project site, the Project has no potential to result in the loss of forest land or the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. No impact would occur.

(e) Conversion of Land. As discussed in response 4.2.a above, EIR No. 329 determined that development of the Menifee North Specific Plan would preclude future use of the site for agricultural use. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that Project implementation would result a significant .

However, no mitigation measures were proposed for the discontinuance of farming on-site and the loss of Prime Farmlands.

The Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program classifies the Project site as Farmland of Local Importance. Farmland of Local Importance is either currently producing or has the capability of production; but does not meet the criteria of Prime, Statewide or U nique Farmland. The site can be considered to be Fallow Agricultural Land. The description of this habitat and vegetation communities is based on the definitions found in MSHCP Section 2.1.3 and A Manual of California Vegetation:

Second Edition (Sawyer et al. 2009). Fallow Agricultural Land includes fallow fields that have been recently disked, plowed, or are no longer used to produce crops and are slowly being encroached by non-native herbaceous plant species. In some cases, native annual wildflowers become established in fallow agricultural lands. The Project site is not currently providing active agricultural land of use to the local economy. In addition, the Project site has been planned for residential and open space uses by the County of Riverside since 1993 and the City of Menifee since 20 13 and this type of development has been anticipated for the Project site. Therefore, no unanticipated impact would occur as a result of the proposed Project.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan is located within an area undergoing rapid urbanization as a result of demand pressures for housing, as is occurring in most of Riverside County, and that a number of other major projects were pending in the project area at the time of certification.

EIR No. 329 also noted that i ncluding the Menifee North Specific Plan, the other major developments in the area cumulatively propose d approximately 32,500 dwelling units, generating an estimated population of 84,175 persons. In addition to the residential elements of these projects, EIR No. 329 found that these projects include d an estimated total of 850 acres of Town Center, Commercial, Business Park and/or Industrial use. EIR No. 329 found that t he 2,654 units proposed by the Menifee North Specific Plan constitute 8.2% of the total dwelling units proposed and approved in the area. While the individual projects may contribute marginally to growth in the area, EIR No. 329 determined that the collective projects would cumulatively create an overall change in the once rural and sparsely populated nature of the Sun City/Menifee Valley and Romoland/Homeland region. EIR No. 329 also determined that construction of various projects in the vicinity would continue the trend towards development of agricultural lands in Riverside County, which would involve some land designated as "Prime Farmlands" on the Countywide Agricultural Resources Map. EIR No. 329 found that the Menifee North Specific Plan Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 92

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
445 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
30 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
and the Menifee Ranch Specific Plan would redevelop "Prime Farmlands", resulting in a significant impact both on a project basis and cumulatively. In addition, the development of these projects in what was once a semi-rural/ agricultural but steadily developing area could result in conversion of adjoining lands to similar uses, particularly agricultural and open space uses remaining in the area. Therefore, ultimate urbanization of the project vicinity could potentially, indirectly influence expansion throug hout the area. However, EIR No. 329 determined that cumulative projects constructed within the Specific Plan area and conforming to County General Plan and zoning designations would have impacts anticipated by the General Plan EIR, and would not create adverse cumulative impacts to agricultural resources.

The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project site with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would not convert farmland to a non- farmland use and would not result in the loss of forest resources. Therefore, the cumulative agricultural impact from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Conclusion

There are no agricultural or forest related resources in or near the Project area that would be impacted.

The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. No subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation measures are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 93

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
446 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 31
City of Menifee

4.3 – Air Quality
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.

Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
b) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of
any criteria pollutant for
which the Project region is
non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard?
Yes
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
No No No
c) Expose sensitive
receptors to substantial
pollutant concentrations?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
d) Result in other emissions
(such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a
substantial number of
people?
No Not
Analyzed No No No

A Trip Generation, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Supplemental Memorandum was prepared for the proposed Project by MIG, Inc. (See Appendix B). The information in this section was taken from the Trip Generation, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Supplemental Memorandum.

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Conflict with AQMP. EIR No. 329 evaluated project consistency in the context of the 1989 AQMP.

The EIR identified that the Menifee North Specific Plan would add approximately 2,654 dwelling units and increase population by approximately 10,616 people. The 2,654 dwelling units would be within the 280,000 units (consisting of 89,200 existing dwelling units and 168,800 additional projected dwelling units) forecasted for the Central Riverside Subregion for 2010.

Since certification of EIR No. 329, SCAQMD has released updated AQMPs, with the 20 22 AQMP currently in effect. The proposed Project would result in one less housing unit than the project evaluated in EIR No. 329, and so the project would not result in greater growth than was evaluated by EIR No. 329. The proposed Project would remain consistent with land use designations and population projections used to prepare the 2022 AQMP and would not conflict with the control Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 94

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
447 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
32 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
measures in the AQMP. Therefore, the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of an applicable air quality plan, and would result in a less than significant impact.

(b) Cumulative Increase in Air Pollution. EIR No. 329 estimated construction emissions from grading activities and equipment, and operational emissions from motor vehicles and the combustion/ consumption of gas and energy. The EIR determined that there were significant impacts for CO, NOx, PM, and ROG. The EIR estimated construction impacts would average 11.07 tons/day of particulate matter from grading activities for the 1,546.2 acre project. The EIR also estimated the emissions associated with operating two diesel powered scrapers for eight hours per day, shown in Table 1 below.

Table 1
EIR No. 329 Approved Emissions from Construction Equipment Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)
CO 10.8
NOx 46.0
SOx 3.4
Particulates 3.0
HC 4.7

The EIR identified that motor vehicles would be the main source of operational emissions. The project would generate 138,250 vehicle trips per day and 1,382,500 VMT per day. Electricity and natural gas consumption for residential and commercial uses would also contribute to operational emissions. The EIR’s operational emissions estimates from mobile sources, electricity, and natural gas are shown in Table 2.

Table 2
EIR No. 329 Approved Operational Emissions
Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)
CO 12,320
NOx 3,533
SOx 32
Particulates 830
ROG 1,014

The proposed Project would not result in an increase in emissions for several reasons. First, the Project would result in one less housing unit and no measurable difference in VMT (Translutions 2022). Second, on and off-road equipment emissions have improved over time as new emission standards have been adopted (e.g., Tier 1 -4 off road emission standards, and vehicle fuel efficiency improvements). Third, the proposed Project would follow air quality regulations that have been passed since the approval of the EIR, such as the In -Use Off-Road Diesel Equipment Program and On -Road Heavy-Duty Vehicles (In-Use) Regulation. Finally, the mitigation measures from EIR No. 329 would still apply to the proposed Project. MM-C.6.1 and MM-C.6.2 listed below would reduce Project construction emissions. MM-C.6.1 would reduce particulate matter through its required and recommended dust control actions and could reduce other pollutants by its recommended actions of maintaining construction equipment and using low sulfur fuel. Maintaining construction equipm ent would reduce all criteria pollutan ts by preventing inefficiencies that would result in the combustion of additional fuel. Using low sulfur fuel would reduce Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 95

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
448 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 33
City of Menifee
SOx emissions. MM-C6.2 would reduce VOC emissions through the use of low VOC emitting paints.

Therefore, no cumulatively considerable criteria pollutant impact greater than those identified in EIR No. 329 would result from the proposed Project.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-C.6.1 The quantity of particulate matter and other pollutants emitted during the grading and construction phase of the proposed project may be reduced through watering graded surfaces end planting ground cover as dust palliatives, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Though not required by SCAQMD Rule 403, the following additional mitigations are recommended to minimize construction activity emissions: Water site and equipment morning and evening; spread soil binders on site, unpaved roads and parking areas; operate street -sweepers on paved roads adjacent to site; reestablish ground cover on construction site through seeding and watering; pave construction access roads, clean up the access roads and public roadways of soil, if necessary; and implement rapid cleaning up of debris from streets after major storm events. The following mitigations are recommended to reduce construction equipment emissions:
wash off trucks leaving site; require trucks to maintain two feet of freeboard, i.e., the distance between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides; properly tune and maintain construction equipment, and use low sulfur fuel for construction equipment.

MM-C.6.5 Low VOC (Volatile Organic Compound) emitting paints should be used.

(c) Sensitive Receptors. EIR No. 329 did not directly evaluate the Menifee North Specific Plan’s construction and operational impacts on the sensitive land uses that existed in 1993 when the EIR was written.

There have been no substantial changes to the Project site’s surrounding environment, although some of the development from the approved Menifee North Specific Plan has occurred and resulted in new sensitive receptors near PA-9 and PA-22.

The proposed Project would not change the number of allowed residential units , however it would increase the residential units in PA-9 and decrease the residential units in PA-22. Prior to the proposed amendment, SPA-260 allowed 315 units between PA 9, 22 and 23A. SPA No. 5 proposes 315 allowed units within PA 9 and 22. PA-9 is located approximately 60 feet east of residential receptors across Palomar Road, and borders residential land uses to the north. The proposed Project would reducethe size of PA-9 by 1.1 acres (30.5 acres to 29.4 acres) and allow up to 170 (from 106 to 170), which would result in more construction activity in this planning area; however, this would not result in increased pollution levels at nearby sensitive receptors because, as described above in section a), construction equipment is subject to stricter standards that would reduce emissions compared to 1993 levels.

Furthermore, the addition of 6 4 residential units on flat land would not result in the type of heavy construction that would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollution concentrations. Adding residential units would not result in more construction activity in close proximity to receptors. Most construction activity would not take place along the border of the site. Most construction would occur several hundred feet from sensitive receptors.

The proposed Project would result in 64 fewer residential units in the consolidated PA -22 (56 units in PA-22, 153 in PA-23A), which is approximately 230 feet west of Harvest Valley Elementary School, 50 feet east of residential receptors across Malone Avenue, and 90 feet south of residential receptors across Watson Road. Less intensive construction would result in less exposure for receptors at the school than the project evaluated in EIR No. 329.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 96

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
449 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
34 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

EIR No. 329 did evaluate the placement of sensitive land uses, which it defined as schools, hospitals, convalescent homes and agricultural areas, near major roadways or heavy industrial areas. EIR No. 329 identified the park site in Planning Area 38 and th e school in Planning Area 21 as sensitive land uses. Consistent with EIR No. 329, the proposed Project does not place schools, hospitals, convalescent homes and agricultural areas near major roadways or heavy industrial areas. A portion of PA-22 does place residential areas along Briggs Road; however, it would not expose receptors to substantial levels of pollution from the roadway as there is approximately 80 feet of separation between the building and the road. In addition, the proposed Project would result in less development in PA-22, so fewer residences would be placed near Briggs Road as compared to the 1993 EIR. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. This impact would remain less than significant.

(d) Other Emissions Such as Odors. EIR No. 329 did not evaluate impacts from exposure to odors from the project. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about air quality impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee Nor th Specific Plan’s potential effects due to odor was readily available to the public.

According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook , land uses associated with odor complaints include agricultural operations, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and certain industrial operations (such as manufacturing uses that produce chemicals, paper, etc.). The proposed Project does not involve such land uses. For this reason, the proposed Project would not generate other emissions or odors that could adversely affect a substantial number of people.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 found that construction and operation of the four proposed Menifee Specific Plans would result in cumulative air quality impacts. EIR No. 329 found that the greatest cumulative impact would result from increased vehicle traffic. Table 3 shows t he estimated emissions from the projected 1,529,352 VMT per day.

Table 3
Emissions from Cumulative VMT
Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day)
CO 41,097
NOx 4,547
Sox 808
Particulates 1,077
HC 3,604

The proposed Project would result in less residential development and would not increase VMT. In addition, vehicles would emit lower levels of pollution than those evaluated in the 1993 EIR. Therefore, the Project would not emit higher levels of pollution than what was evaluated and approved in EIR 329.

Conclusion

EIR No. 329 indicated that development of the Specific Plan would result in significant air quality impacts, both as an individual project and cumulatively in terms of air pollutant emissions that exceeded Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 97

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
450 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 35
City of Menifee
then-established standards. The Project would not result in greater emissions than were evaluated and approved in EIR No. 329. The Project proposes less development in the Specific Plan area compared to that evaluated in EIR No. 329, and vehicles and equipment would emit lower levels of pollution. Refer to Appendix B for the Project’s Trip Generation, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Supplemental Memorandum for additional information. The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 98

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
451 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
36 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

4.4 – Biological Resources
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Have a substantial
adverse effect, either directly
or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional
plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California
Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
b) Have a substantial
adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified
in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and
Wildlife Service?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
c) Have a substantial
adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands
(including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
d) Interfere substantially
with the movement of any
native resident or migratory
fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
e) Conflict with any local
policies or ordinances
protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or
No Not
Analyzed No No No
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 99

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
452 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 37
City of Menifee
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the
provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or
state habitat conservation
plan?
No Not
Analyzed No No No

A Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis was prepared for both Project parcels by Searl Biological Services (See Appendix C). The information in this section was taken from the MSHCP Consistency Analyses.

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Listed or Sensitive Species. EIR No. 329 found that development of the Specific Plan would require the removal of most of the existing vegetation in the Specific Plan area and that conversion of cultivated/agricultural biotic communities to urban uses would reduce habitat for wildlife.

However, EIR No. 320 determined that these areas are not considered to be of significance in this regard. Therefore, it was determined that the loss of this habitat would not be significantly adverse.

EIR No. 329 also noted that the majority of the vegetation was found in areas that were being dryland farmed, where there would be no significant impact. It was further noted that coastal sage scrub in the Specific Plan would be protected. EIR No. 329 also found that no other portions of the Planning Area possess sensitive biological resources whose loss would be significantly adverse .

Due to the absence of significant impacts, no measures to mitigate the loss of vegetation and wildlife were implemented by EIR No. 329 . However, it was recommended that project -specific mitigation measures be considered related specifically to Stephen’s kangaroo rat. With the requirement for project-specific measures to mitigate impacts to Stephen’s kangaroo rat, impacts were determined to be less than significant.

The MSHCP Consistency Analyses prepared for the Project parcels found that both parcels are consistent with the goals and objectives of the MSHCP, that no MSHCP Section 6.1.2 resources are present on the Project parcels, and no burrowing owls are known to be on the Project parcels. However, the Project would be required to perform a 30 -Day Pre -Construction BUOW Survey as part of the Project’s Conditions of Approval (COA) prior to ground disturbance due to the presence of suitable BUOW habitat. With the implementation of 30 -day pre -construction burrowing owl surveys on the Project parcels, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-C.11.1 As the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat is on the Federal Endangered Species list, the project will be required to participate in the County's Interim Mitigation Plan, requiring payment of $1,950 per acre of land within SKR range in spite of the fact that SKR was not found onsite during two separate SKR surveys. Within the Habitat Conservation Plan, these funds will be utilized for acquisition of replacement habitat to compensate for the on-site loss of this endangered species. The l0A permit which allows the "incidental taking" of this species is subject to the six-month allocation of available habitat in accordance with U.S. Fish and Wildlife regulations. In order to receive this allocation, the project shall comply with all aspects of the Habitat Conservation Plan. This mitigation has b een Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 100

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
453 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
38 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
deemed to be a sufficient mitigation measure relative to the incidental taking of the species by the County of Riverside.

(b) Riparian or Sensitive Habitat. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about biological resources impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects on riparian and sensitive habitat was readily available to the public.

The MSHCP Consistency Analyses prepared for the Project parcels found that neither of the Project parcels contains riparian/riverine features. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact on riparian habitat or any other sensitive natural community.

(c) Wetlands. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts to wetlands. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about biological resources impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects on wetlands was readily available to the public.

The MSHCP Consistency Analyses prepared for the Project parcels found that there are no wetlands on the Project parcels and no evidence of vernal pools on the Project parcels. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact on state or federally protected wetlands.

(d) Wildlife Movement. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts to wildlife movement. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about biological resources impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Me nifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects on wildlife movement was readily available to the public.

The Project parcels are not known to contain any natural habitat or community that could support the movement of wildlife. The Project parcels are not known to be used as part of any wildlife corridor. Therefore, the proposed Project would have no impact on the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors.

(e) Local Policies. EIR No, 329 did not analyze impacts related to conflicts with local policies protecting biological resources. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about biological resources impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects on local policies adopted for the purpose of protecting biological resources was readily available to the public.

As previously noted, the Project site does not contain any natural habitat or community, does not contain any riparian/riverine areas, and does not contain any wetlands. The Project site does not contain any trees and the proposed Project would not include the removal of any trees. Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with a local policy protecting biological resources.

(f) Habitat Conservation Plans. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to conflicts with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about biological resources Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 101

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
454 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 39
City of Menifee
impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential conflicts with the MSHCP was readily available to the public.

The MSHCP Consistency Analyses prepared for the Project parcels found that no MSHCP Section

6.1.2 resources are present on the Project parcels, and the Project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the MSHCP, with the implementation of 30 -day pre -construction burrowing owl surveys. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant with incorporation of mitigation measures.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 noted that the loss of rural/agriculture habitat from the Menifee North project site is not significant in itself. However, EIR No. 329 found that the Projec t would contribute on an incremental basis to cumulative impacts to biological resources in the region as a result of past and planned developments, including an overall reduction in the native and naturalized biotic resources of the region.

In regard to the Federally listed endangered Stephens' kangaroo rat, EIR No. 329 found that loss of potential on-site habitat would be incremental for individual projects; however, the cumulative loss of its habitat from the region contributes further to its decline. EIR No. 329 noted that the four ''Menifee" Specific Plan projects are proposed on sites that primarily support rural/agricultural biotic communities, and the Menifee North, Menifee East, and Menifee Ranch projects all preserve as natural open space the areas of coastal sage scrub vegetation found on-site. EIR No. 329 noted that the "Menifee" Specific Plan projects would be required to participate in the Stephens' Kangaroo Rat Interim Mitigation Plan, requiring payment of $1,950 dollars per acre, and that the 3,582 acres of land encompassed by these proposed Specific Plans would require the payment of $6,984,900 in SKR fees. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that no significant biological impacts would occur with the payment of fees.

The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project site with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the requirements of t he Western Riverside County Habitat Conservation Plan . Therefore, the cumulative impact on biological resources from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Conclusion

The Project site does not contain wetlands, riparian habitat, sensitive plants or animals, or other important biological resources. With implementation of 30-day pre -construction burrowing owl surveys, potential impacts to biological resources would be reduced to less than significant levels.

In these ways, the Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Menifee North Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 102

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
455 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
40 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

4.5 – Cultural Resources
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of a historical
resource pursuant to
Section15064.5?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
b) Cause a substantial
adverse change in the
significance of an
archaeological resource
pursuant to
Section15064.5?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
c) Disturb any human
remains, including those
interred outside of dedicated
cemeteries?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No

A Cultural Resources Study was prepared for each of the Project parcels by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. (See Appendix D). The information in this section was taken from the Cultural Resources Studies.

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Historical Resources. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts to historical resources. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about cultural resources impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects on historical resources was readily available to the public.

The Cultural Resources Studies for the proposed Project note that aerial imagery shows the property has been largely disturbed by agricultural use since the 1960s. Since at least 2005, the properties have been used for the dumping of soils and construction debris, likely associated with nearby residential developments. The pedestrian survey indicated that the entirety of the Project parcels have been disturbed by historic agricultural use, vegetation clearing, disking, and the development of the surrounding area. Modern trash and building material consisting of gravel, asphalt, and concrete fragments were noted throughout the property. The survey did not result in the identification of any cultural resources, and no historic or prehistoric resources were observed during the survey. Therefore, the proposed Project would not have an impact on the significance of any historical resources.

(b) Archaeological Resources. EIR No. 329 noted that a review of the archaeological site records on file at the Eastern California Information Center (ECIC) showed three archaeological sites previously identified and one new site located during field investigations for a total of four archaeological sites Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 103

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
456 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 41
City of Menifee
within the Specific Plan area. EIR No. 329 noted that other sites surround the project, but are too distant to be impacted by the Specific Plan. As such, EIR No. 329 determined that because no subsurface artifacts were recorded on or near these identified archaeological sites, no mitiga tion was recommended. However, EIR No. 329 noted that given the element of uncertainty of any archaeological survey due to the "underground" dimension, a Condition of Approval would be included which required that should archaeological materials be found during grading activities, a qualified archaeologist shall be retained for their evaluation. Therefore, with the requirement to retain a qualified archaeologist to properly evaluate any potential archaeological materials discovered during grading activities, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant.

According to the Cultural Resources Studies for the proposed Project, t he Phase I archaeological assessments for the Project parcels were negative for the presence of cultural resources. However, it is noted that visibility of the Project parcels was extremely poor due to dense non -native grasses and weeds and, therefore, it was not clear if any cultural resources have ever existed on the Project parcels.

The studies note that the current status of the Project parcels appears to have affected the potential to discover any surface sc atters of artifacts. In addition, g iven that the prior agricultural use within the Project might have masked archaeological deposits, and based upon the limited visibility during the survey, the Cultural Resources Studies determined that there is a potential that buried archaeological deposits are present within the Project parcels. Therefore, Mitigation Measure MM -C.15.1 has been incorporated requiring implementation of a cultural resources monitoring program conducted by an archaeologist and Native American representative during grading of the Project parcels. Monitoring during ground-disturbing activities, such as grading or trenching, by a qualified archaeologist is required to ensure that if buried features ( i.e., human remains, hearths, or cultu ral deposits) are present, they would be handled in a timely and proper manner. With incorporation of MM-C.15.1, impacts to archaeological resources from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-C.15.1 Monitoring during ground -disturbing activities, such as grading or trenching, by a qualified archaeologist is recommended to ensure that if buried features ( i.e., human remains, hearths, or cultural deposits) are present, they will be handled in a timely and proper manner. The scope of the monitoring program is provided below:

1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall provide written verification that a certified archaeologist has been retained to implement the monitoring program.

This verification shall be presented in a letter from the project archaeologist to the lead agency.
2) The project applicant shall provide Native American monitoring during grading. The Native American monitor shall work in concert with the archaeological monitor to observe ground disturbances and search for cultural materials. 3) The certified archaeologist shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the contractors to explain and coordinate the requirements of the monitoring program. 4) During the original cutting of previously undisturbed deposits, the archaeological monitor(s) and tribal representative shall be on-site, as determined by the consulting archaeologist, to perform periodic inspections of the excavations. The frequency of inspections will depend upon the rate of excavation, the materials excavated, and the presence and abundance of artifacts and features. The consulting archaeologist shall have the authority to modify the monitoring program if the potential for cultural resources appears to be less than anticipated.
5) Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits will be minimally documented in the field so the monitored grading can proceed.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 104

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
457 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
42 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
6) In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered, th e archaeologist shall have the authority to divert or temporarily halt ground disturbance operation in the area of discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. The archaeologist shall contact the lead agency at the time of discovery. The archaeologist, in consultation with the lead agency, shall determine the significance of the discovered resources. The lead agency must concur with the evaluation before construction activities will be allowed to resume in the affected area. For significant cultural resources, a Research Design and Data Recovery Program to mitigate impacts shall be prepared by the consulting archaeologist and approved by the lead agency before being carried out using professional archaeological methods. If any human bones are discovered, the county coroner and lead agency shall be contacted. In the event that the remains are determined to be of Native American origin, the Mos t Likely Descendant (MLD), as identified by the NAHC, shall be contacted in order to determine proper treatment and disposition of the remains.
7) Before construction activities are allowed to resume in the affected area, the artifacts shall be recovered and features recorded using professional archaeological methods. The project archaeologist shall determine the amount of material to be recovered for an adequate artifact sample for analysis. 8) All cultural material collected during the grading monitoring program shall be processed and curated according to the current professional repository standards.

The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to an appropriate curation facility, to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation.
9) A report documenting the field and analysis results and interpreting the artifact and research data within the research context shall be completed and submitted to the satisfaction of the lead agency prior to the issuance of any building permits. The report will include DPR Primary and Archaeological Site Forms.

(c) Human Remains. EIR No. 329 did not address the disturbance of human remains. If human remains are discovered during Project grading or other ground disturbing activities, the Project would be required to comply with the applicable provisions of California Health and Safety Code Section7050.5 as well as Public Resources Code Section5097 et. seq. If the Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) must be contacted and the NAHC must then i mmediately notify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. In addition, standard conditions of approval have been incorporated requiring implementation of a cultural resources monitoring program conducted by an archaeologist and Native American representative during grading of the Project parcels. Monitoring during ground -disturbing activities, such as grading or trenching, by a qualified archaeologist is required to ensure that if buried features (i.e., human remains, hearths, or cultural deposits) are present, they would be handled in a timely and proper manner. These standard conditions of approval would ensure that discovered human remains are properly treated. Compliance with established health and safety regulations , and stand conditions of approval, would reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 noted that development of the area may disturb existing unknown archaeological or paleontological resources because of grading and excavation activities unless these areas are preserved as natural open space. However, EIR No. 329 noted that if a certified archaeologist or Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 105

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
458 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 43
City of Menifee
paleontologist is present, where necessary, during the grading operations, these impacts may be largely mitigated. EIR No. 329 also noted that this impact may be considered positive due to the discovery of resources which would have not otherwise been evaluated or uncovered because it is possible that grading and excavation in the area could uncover valuable resources which would contribute to the paleo-environmental and archaeological record of the southwestern Riverside County area. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that the Specific Plan would not have adverse cumulative cultural resources impacts.

The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project site with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. While there are no known historical or cultural resources on the Project pa rcels, mitigation has been incorporated in the unlikely event that potential cultural resources are discovered during ground-disturbing activities. The proposed Project would be required to incorporate mitigation requiring archaeological and Native American monitoring during all -ground disturbing activities. Therefore, the cumulative cultural resources impact from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Conclusion

Impacts to historic resources are not anticipated. Impacts to archaeological resources can be reduced to less than significant with implementation of a comprehensive grading monitoring program .

Additionally, compliance with established health and safety regulations would reduce potential human remains impacts to less than significant levels. The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Menifee North Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts with incorporation of mitigation . As such, no subsequent environmental analysis is required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 106

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
459 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
44 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

4.6 – Energy
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Result in potentially
significant environmental
impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy
resources, during project
construction or operation?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
b) Conflict with or obstruct
a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy
efficiency??
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Energy Consumption. EIR No. 329 found that there was a less than significant impact to energy conservation after mitigation requiring passive solar heating and compliance with Title 24 energy conservation measures. EIR No. 329 analyzed emissions from energy demand, using the number and size of dwelling units to estimate electricity and natural gas consumption. EIR No. 329 found that residential units would consume approximately 6,081 kwh/unit/year, and the project, which consisted of 2,654 units, would consume approximately 16,138,974 kwh per year from residential uses. Total project electricity consumption, including business park and industrial uses, was found to be approximately 96,543,940 kwh. In addition, EIR No. 329 found that each residential unit would consume approximately 6,665 cubic feet of natural gas per month, with total project natural gas consumption estimated to be approximately 17,688,910 cubic feet of natural gas per month for residential uses and 38,244,635 cubic feet per month for all land uses.

The proposed Project would consume diesel and gasoline fuel during construction, and gasoline, electricity, and natural gas during construction. This energy consumption would be necessary for the development and operation of the Project. On-site, heavy-duty construction equipment and delivery trucks would primarily consume diesel fuel, and construction worker trips would primarily use gasoline.

These vehicles would be subject to state regulations that have been adopted since the approval of EIR No. 329, including increased fuel efficiency standards for passenger vehicles and medium and heavy- duty trucks. As a result, heavy duty trucks used during Project construction and passenger vehicles used in construction and operation of the Project would consume less energy than vehicles evaluated in EIR No. 329.

The proposed Project would result in one less residential unit than the project evaluated in EIR NO 329 and would therefore result in less energy consumption. In addition, energy efficiency improvements have occurred since the approval of EIR No. 329. The amount of electricity generated by renewable sources in the State has increased over the last few decades. Projects built in the State would also now be subject to the 2022 Title 24 Building Code, which contains standards that are more energy efficient Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 107

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
460 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 45
City of Menifee
than previous building codes. Fuel efficiency standards for on-road vehicles have also improved due to new regulations at the State and federal level. Finally, the mitigation measures from EIR No. 329 would reduce Project energy use and ensure consistency with California code . MM-C13.1 recommends passive solar heating techniques that would reduce operational energy consumption and MM -C13.2 requires compliance with energy efficiency requirements in the California Administrative Code.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, and impacts from energy consumption would be less than significant.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-C.13.1 Passive solar heating techniques will be encouraged whenever possible within the project. Passive systems involve orienting buildings properly, planting trees to take advantage of the sun, seeing that roof over hangs are adequate, making sure that walls are properly insulated and installing simple heat storage systems.

MM-C.13.2 Building energy conservation will largely be achieved for residential, commercial, business park and industrial units by compliance with Title 24 of the California Administrative Code.

Title 24, California Administrative Code Section 2 -5307(b) is the California Energy Conservation Standard for New Buildings which prohibits the installation of fixtures unless the manufacturer has certified to the CEC compliance with the flow rate standards. Title 24, California Administrative Code Sections 2 -5452(i) and (j) address pipe installation requirements which can reduce water used before hot water reaches equipment or fixtures. Title 20, California Administrative Code Sections 1604(0 and 1601(b) a re Appliance Efficiency Standards that set the maximum flow rates of all plumbing fixtures and prohibit the sale of non-conforming fixtures.

(b) Conflict with Local Plan. EIR No. 329 did not directly evaluate the Menifee North Specific Plan’s consistency with state or local plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency. However, EIR No. 329 found that the Menifee North Specific Plan would be consistent with the Land Use S tandard from the County’s General Plan, which encouraged the use of solar energy for water heating and required project design layout to facilitate passive and active solar systems. As described above in Section a), EIR No. 329 required compliance with Title 24. The proposed Project would result in one less dwelling unit than the Menifee North Specific Plan approved by EIR No. 329, and would not interfere with the implementation of state or local energy plans. As described below in 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions, many energy efficiency programs, including those from the Riverside County General Plan EIR, have gone into effect that would reduce energy consumption from the proposed Project. The City has not adopted a specific docume nt for the purposes of addressing renewable energy or energy efficiency; however, the proposed Project would be consistent with the County General Plan policies related to energy efficiency and comply with statewide regulations, including 2022 Title 24 building standards.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency, and would result in a less than significant impact.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan is located within an area undergoing rapid urbanization. EIR No. 329 would have an estimated cumulative total of 32,500 dwelling units in the project area, resulting in approximately 197,632,500 kwh/year and approximately 216,612,500 cubic feet per month of natural gas for residential uses. The proposed project would result in less residential Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 108

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
461 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
46 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
development, and would use less energy than evaluated in EIR No. 329. Therefore, the cumulative energy impact is less than significant.

Conclusion

EIR No. 329 found there was a less than significant energy impact with the implementation of mitigation measures that would reduce operational energy consumption. The Project would result in energy consumption; however, because it includes one less residential unit and would comply with stricter state requirements, the proposed Project is expected to consume less energy than the Specific Plan analyzed in EIR No. 329. Therefore, energy impacts from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environme ntal impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation is required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 109

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
462 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 47
City of Menifee

4.7 – Geology and Soils
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving
New or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Directly or indirectly
cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including
the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:

i) Rupture of a known
earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by
the State Geologist for
the area or based on
other substantial
evidence of a known
fault? Refer to Division
of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.

Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
ii) Strong seismic
ground shaking? Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
iii) Seismic-related
ground failure, including
liquefaction?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
iv) Landslides?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
b) Result in substantial soil
erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
c) Be located on a
geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result
of the Project, and
potentially result in on- or
off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
d) Be located on
expansive soil, as defined in No Not
Analyzed No No No
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 110

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
463 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
48 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1997),
creating substantial direct or
indirect risks to life or
property?
e) Have soils incapable of
adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water
disposal systems where
sewers are not available for
the disposal of waste water?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
f) Directly or indirectly
destroy a unique
paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic
feature?
Yes
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
No No No

A Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation was prepared for each the proposed Project parcels by LGC Geotechnical, Inc. (See Appendix E). The information in this section was taken from the Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluations.

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a.i) Fault Rupture. EIR No. 329 determined that the Specific Plan area is not located within an Alquist- Priolo Fault Zone. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts would be less than significant.

The proposed Project is located in a seismically active area of Southern California and is expected to experience moderate to severe ground shaking during the lifetime of the Project. However, the Project site is not located within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone (i.e., Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Act Zone) and no active faults are known to cross the site. A fault is considered “active” if evidence of surface rupture in Holocene time (the last approximately 11,000 years) is present. The possibility of damage due to ground rupture is considered low since no active faults are known to cross the sites. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project would be required to construct the proposed structures in accordance with the California Building Code (CBC). Detailed design -level geotechnical studies and building plans pursuant to the California Building Standards Code are required prior to approval of construction. The City’s Building and Safety Department would review the building pla ns through building plan checks, issuance of a building permit, and inspection of the building during construction, which would ensure that all required CBC seismic safety measures are incorporated into the building. Compliance with the CBC as verified by the City’s review process, would reduce impacts related to strong seismic ground shaking to less than significant levels.

(a.ii) Strong Seismic Ground Shaking . As described in EIR No. 329 , the Planning Area lies within Groundshaking Zones II and III per the Seismic/Geologic Map, and the Specific Plan proposes Essential and Normal-Low Risk Land Uses. EIR No. 329 noted that the degree of suitability for Normal-Low Risk land uses relative to G roundshaking Zones II and III range from generally suitable to provisionally suitable and provisionally suitable to generally unsuitable respectively. EIR No. 329 found that the proposed Normal-Low Risk Land Uses would be considered compatible with these G roundshaking Zones. However, EIR No. 329 noted that proposed Essential Land Uses (school sites) range from generally unsuitable to provisionally suitable to restricted in these zones. However, EIR No. 329 noted Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 111

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
464 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 49
City of Menifee
that Project structures and foundations would be designed to resist seismic forces in accordance with the criteria contained in the Uniform Building Code. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts related to strong seismic ground shaking would be less than significant with compliance with existing regulations.

The proposed Project parcels are located in a seismically active area of Southern California and are expected to experience moderate to severe ground shaking during the lifetime of the Project. As a mandatory condition of Project approval, the Project woul d be required to construct the proposed structures in accordance with the California Building Code (CBC). Detailed design -level geotechnical studies and building plans pursuant to the California Building Standards Code are required prior to approval of con struction. The City’s Building and Safety Department would review the building plans through building plan checks, issuance of a building permit, and inspection of the building during construction, which would ensure that all required CBC seismic safety measures are incorporated into the building. Compliance with the CBC as verified by the City’s review process, would reduce impacts related to strong seismic ground shaking to less than significant levels.

(a.iii) Liquefaction. As described in EIR No. 329, liquefaction hazards are considered low within the Planning Area due to the depth of groundwater (over 100 feet). Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts related to liquefaction would be less than significant.

Based on a review of the County of Riverside Liquefaction Maps (RCIT, 2018), the Project parcels are located in an area depicted as having a “low” potential for liquefaction. In addition, site soils are not generally susceptible to liquefaction due to a lack of groundwater in the upper 50 feet and generally dense nature of the onsite soils. Therefore, impacts from the proposed Project related to liquefaction would be less than significant.

(a.iv) Landslides. EIR No. 329 determined that landsliding is not considered to be a potential hazard in the Planning Area due to the lack of slopes in the area. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined impacts related to landslides would be less than significant.

Review of readily available geologic resources and field observations of the surficial conditions do not indicate the presence of landslides on the Project parcels or in the immediate vicinity. Topographically, the site is relatively flat and is not considered susceptible to landslides, seismically-induced landslides, or other mass wasting processes (debris flows, rock falls, etc.). Therefore, the proposed Project’s impacts would be less than significant.

(b) Erosion/Loss of Topsoil. EIR No. 329 found that Implementation of the Menifee North Specific Plan could result in short-term erosion and sedimentation impacts during project grading. EIR No. 329 also found that Project grading could result in the creation of temporarily exposed ground surfaces, thereby creating the potential for erosion and sedimentation of local drainage courses. However, In accordance with the requirements of the Riverside County Flood Control District, EIR No. 329 noted that the Proj ect would employ erosion control devices during grading, such as temporary berms, culverts, sand-bagging or desilting basins. Also, EIR No. 329 noted that Grading Plan Development Standard No. 2 of the Specific Plan requires a Grading Plan be prepared that includes techniques employed to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts would be less than significant.

The proposed Project is within the scope of the Menifee North Specific Plan area. Reduction of the erosion potential can be accomplished through implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which specifies Best Management Practices for temporary erosion controls. Such measures typically include temporary catch basi ns and/or sandbagging to control runoff and contain Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 112

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
465 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
50 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
sediment transport within the Project site. The SWPPP is required for plan check and approval by the City’s Building and Safety Department, prior to provision of permits for the Project, and would include construction BMPs. With adherence to existing regulations, this potential impact would be considered less than significant.

(c) Unstable Geologic Unit. EIR No. 329 noted that the primary cause of subsidence is due to decline in static water levels caused by removal of large quantities of ground water. However, EIR No. 329 found that no evidence for significant static water level declines beneath Menifee North have be en indicated by ground water data. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined impacts would be less than significant.

The Project parcels are relatively flat and there are no slopes on the sites that are susceptible to lateral spreading. Due to the lack of groundwater in the upper 50 feet, the low potential for liquefaction, and lack of a nearby “free face” condition, the potential for lateral spreading is considered very low. Detailed design-level geotechnical studies and building plans pursuant to the California Building Standards Code are required prior to approval of construction. Compliance with the recommendations of the site specific geotechnical study for soils conditions is a standard practice and would be required by the City Building and Safety Department. Compliance with the requirements of the California Building Standards Code as identified in a site specific geotechnical design would be reviewed by the City for appropriate inclusion, as part of the building plan check and development review process . Therefore, this would reduce the potential for the above-described seismic issues to a less than significant level.

(d) Expansive Soils. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to expansive soils . However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about geology and soils impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to expansive soils was readily available to the public.

The Project site is generally underlain by soils that are not considered to be expansive. In addition, detailed design -level geotechnical studies and building plans pursuant to the California Building Standards Code are required prior to approval of construction. Therefore, impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant.

(e) Septic Systems. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to septic systems. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about geology and soils impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menif ee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to septic tanks was readily available to the public.

The Project does not include the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems.

Therefore, soils impacts related to underground septic systems would not occur.

(f) Paleontological Resources. EIR No. 329 determined that the Menifee North Specific Plan could expose fossils through grading and other developmental activities, but at the same time, could destroy these same remains. As such, EIR No. 329 determined that this would have a significant adverse impact on the paleontological resources of the region, and mitigation measures were incorporated to reduce the adverse impact of development and protect the paleontological resources of the area. With adherence to these measures EIR No. 329 determined that impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 113

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
466 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 51
City of Menifee
The proposed Project has the potential to uncover and possibly destroy previously undiscovered paleontological resources. As such, the proposed Project would be required to adhere to the requirements of mitigation measure MM-C.15.2, which incorporates the mitigation plan adopted in EIR No.329. With incorporation of mitigation measure MM-C.15.2, impacts from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-C.15.2 Since the palaeontologic sensitivity for the site is very low, there is no need to have a grading monitor present on the property for near surface grading. However, earthmoving occurring at depths greater than 10 feet shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist, along with older alluvium deposits which occur at depths of less than ten feet. Monitoring on a part -time basis should be satisfactory for the Project given the relatively low sensitivity of the sediments. If fossils are found by the owners of the property, their agents, contractors, or subcontractors during the development of the property, they shall be reported immediately to a qualified, professional paleontologist for evaluation.

If grading of older alluvium occurs or earthmoving occurs at depths of more than ten feet, or if fossils are encountered on the property during development, the following mitigation procedures shall be followed:

1) The project paleontologist shall immediately evaluate the fossils which have been discovered to determine if they are significant and, if so, to develop a plan to collect and study them for the purpose of mitigation.
2) A paleontologic monitor shall be immediately retained to be present during earthmoving on the property. The monitor must be empowered to temporarily halt or redirect excavation equipment if additional fossils are found to allow evaluation and removal of them if necessary. The monitor shall be equipped to speedily collect specimens if they are encountered.
3) The monitor, with assistance if necessary, shall collect individual fossils and/or samples of fossil bearing sediments. If specimens of small animal species are encountered, the most time and cost efficient method of recovery is to remove a selected volume of fossil bearing earth from the grading area and stockpile it oft' site for processing by screen washing.
4) Fossils recovered during earthmoving or as a result of screen -washing of sediment samples shall be cleaned and prepared sufficiently to allow identification. This allows the fossils to be described in a report of findings and reduces the volume of matrix around specimens prior to storage, thus reducing storage costs. 5) A report of findings shall be prepared and submitted to the public agency responsible for overseeing developments and mitigation of environmental impacts upon completion of mitigation. This report will minimally include a settlement of the types of paleontologic resources found, the methods and procedures used to recover them, an inventory of the specimens recovered, and a settlement of their scientific significance.
6) The paleontological specimens recovered as a result of mitigation shall be donated to a qualified scientific institution where they would be afforded long term preservation to allow future scientific study.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 114

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
467 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
52 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 noted that impacts resulting from grading for construction of development projects in the area would alter the natural topography of the region, and cut and fill operations would be necessary in areas designated for development of lots and pads. EIR No. 329 also noted that this may, in some cases, require extensive cut and fill operation which could impact landforms. In addition, EIR No. 329 found that because of the presence of re gional faults, the potential exists for impacts as a result of a seismic episode. Finally, EIR No. 329 noted that the four "Menifee" Specific Plan projects (North, Ranch, East and Estates) propose a total of approximately 13,310,200 cubic yards of earthwork in the area.

However, EIR No. 329 determined that the proposed Specific Plans are located on relatively flat terrain, resulting in limited impacts to hillside areas. For these reasons, EIR No. 329 determined that cumulative geologic impacts would be less than significant.

The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and are designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project parcels with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would be required to implement the recommendations of the geotechnical investigation and comply with the seismic design guidelines of the California Building Code . Therefore, the cumulative geology and soils impact from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Conclusion

The proposed Project would either have no impacts or less than significant impacts related to geologic and soil constraints with implementation of standard grading, dust control, and erosion control measures and adhering to existing regulatory compliance . There are no known paleontological resources or unique geologic features within the Specific Plan area; however, mitigation is required to ensure impacts to paleontological resources would be less than significant. The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 115

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
468 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 53
City of Menifee

4.8 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing New
or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Generate greenhouse
gas emissions, either
directly or indirectly, that
may have a significant
impact on the
environment?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
b) Conflict with an
applicable plan, policy or
regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse
gases?
No Not
Analyzed No No No

A Trip Generation, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Supplemental Memorandum was prepared for the proposed Project by MIG, Inc. (See Appendix B). The information in this section was taken from the Trip Generation, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Supplemental Memorandum.

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a-b) Greenhouse Gas Emissions. EIR No. 329 did not specifically address GHG emissions or climate change impacts; however, EIR No. 329 did conclude “climate and air quality” would have a significant impact (pg. V-156). However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about air quality and energy impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to greenhouse gas emissions was readily available to the public.

Gases that trap heat in the atmosphere and affect regulation of the Earth’s temperature are known as Greenhouse Gases (GHG). GHG that contribute to climate change are a different type of pollutant than criteria or hazardous air pollutants because climate c hange is global in scale, both in terms of causes and effects. The six most common GHGs are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), sulfur hexafluoride, hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), and perfluorocarbons (PFCs). GHG emissions from human activities contribute to overall GHG concentrations in the atmosphere and the corresponding effects of global climate change (e.g., rising temperatures, increased severe weather events such as drought and flooding).

Although EIR No. 329 did not specifically address GHG emissions, the Air Quality analyses contained in these documents did include several mitigation measures pertaining to construction emissions, energy resources and vehicle miles travelled (VMT). MM-C.6.1 includes a requirement to properly maintain construction equipment, which would lower GHGs by avoiding inefficient combustion. MM- D.1.2 requires the addition of a bikeway, and MM-D.1.3 and MM-D.1.4 recommend the addition of bus stops and park-n-rides, respectively. MM-D.1.2 to MM-D.1.4 would reduce VMT and GHGs by providing Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 116

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
469 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
54 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
alternatives to single occupancy vehicle trips. MM-C.13.1 and MM -C.13.2 encourage passive solar heating techniques and requires compliance with Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, respectively, which would lower GHGs by reducing energy consumption.

Over the last couple of decades, the State of California has implemented numerous plans, policies, and regulations to curtail GHG emissions and address the effects of climate change. Many of these actions are enacted at the State level; however, local air districts provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining the significance of project GHG emissions in their CEQA documents. The following regulatory actions would result in the reduction of GHG emissions past what would have been estimated when EIR No. 329 was approved in 1993.

Assembly Bill 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act) and Related GHG Emission Reduction Goals
In September 2006, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed AB 32, the California Climate Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 establishes the caps on statewide GHG emissions proclaimed in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05 and established the timeline for meeting State GHG reduction targets. The deadline for meeting the 2020 reduction target is December 31, 2020.

As part of AB 32, CARB determined 1990 GHG emissions levels and projected a “ business-as-usual” (BAU)ii estimate for 2020, to determine the amount of GHG emission reductions that would need to be achieved. In 2007, CARB approved a statewide 1990 emissions level and corresponding 2020 GHG emissions limit of 427 million MTCO 2e (CARB 2007). In 2008, CARB adopted its Climate Change Scoping Plan , which projects 2020 statewide GHG emissions levels of 596 million MTCO 2e and identifies numerous measures (i.e., mandatory rules and regulations and voluntary measures) that would achieve at least 174 million MTCO2e of GHG reductions and bring statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (CARB 2009).

EO B-30-15, 2030 Carbon Target and Adaptation, issued by Governor Brown in April 2015, set a target of reducing GHG emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels in 2030. To achieve this ambitious target, Governor Brown identified five key goals for reducing GHG emissions in California through 2030:

• Increase renewable electricity to 50 percent.
• Double energy efficiency savings achieved in existing buildings and make heating fuels cleaner.
• Reduce petroleum use in cars and trucks by up to 50 percent. • Reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants.
• Manage farms, rangelands, forests, and wetlands to increasingly store carbon.

By directing State agencies to take measures consistent with their existing authority to reduce GHG emissions, EO B-30-15 establishes coherence between the 2020 and 2050 GHG reduction goals set by AB 32 and seeks to align California with the scientifically established GHG emissions levels needed to limit global warming below two degrees Celsius.

To reinforce the goals established through EO B-30-15, Governor Brown signed SB 32 and AB 197 on September 8, 2016. SB 32 made the GHG reduction target (to reduce GHG emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030) a requirement, as opposed to a goal. AB 197 gives the Legislature additional

ii BAU is a term used to define emissions levels without considering reductions from future or existing programs or technologies.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 117

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
470 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 55
City of Menifee
authority over CARB to ensure the most successful strategies for lowering emissions are implemented, and requires CARB to, “protect the State’s most impacted and disadvantaged communities …[and] consider the social costs of the emissions of greenhouse gases.”

Executive Order B-55-18, AB 1279, and SB 1020
On September 10, 2018, Governor Brown signed Executive Order B-55-18, to achieve carbon neutrality by moving California to 100% clean energy by 2045. This Executive Order also includes specific measures to reduce GHG emissions via clean transportation, energy efficient buildings, directing cap- and-trade funds to disadvantaged communities, and better management of the State’s forest land. On September 16, 2022, Governor Newson signed into law AB 1279, the California Climate Crisis Act, and SB 1020, the Clean Energy, Jobs, and Affordability Act of 2022. AB 1279 codified California’s 2045 carbon neutrality goal and established a GHG emission reduction target of 85% below 1990 levels. SB 1020 set targets for the retail sale of electricity of 90% clean electricity by 2035 and 95% by 2040, and 100% by 2045. It also set a target for 100% clean electricity for electricity serving state agencies by 2035.

CARB Scoping Plan
The CARB Scoping Plan is the comprehensive plan primarily directed at identifying the measures necessary to reach the GHG reduction targets stipulated in AB 32. The second update to the scoping plan, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan update (CARB 2017b), was adopted by CARB in December 2017. The primary objective for the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan is to identify the measures required to achieve the mid -term GHG reduction target for 2030 (i.e., reduce emissions by 40 percent below 1990 levels by 203 0) established under EO B -30-15 and SB 32. The Draft 2022 Scoping Plan was released in May 2022. The plan presents a scenario for California to meet the State goal of reducing GHG emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 and to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 (CARB 2022b). The Draft 2022 Scoping Plan is expected to be finalized in the fall of 2022.

City of Menifee Greenhouse Gas Reduction Policy and Implementation Strategies The City of Menifee adopted the proposed GHG Reduction Policy and Implementation Strategies as part of the City’s General Plan (City of Menifee 2013a). As part of City review, the proposed Project would need to be consistent with the General Plan, including the GHG Reduction Policy and Implementation Strategies.

The proposed SPA No. 5 keeps the same number of allowed dwelling units proposed in SP -260 however, TTM 31832 proposes one less unit than PA 9 allows (169 proposed from 170 allowed) and does not include any substantial changes. In addition, the State has implemented regulations to reduce GHGs and vehicles and energy have become more efficient since the approval of EIR No. 329.

Therefore, it is expected that the Project would result in lower GHG emissions than Menifee North Specific Plan analyzed by EIR No. 329. Furthermore, as described below, the GHG emissions from the proposed Project would not be considered new information of substantial importance.

New Information of Substantial Importance Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3) The potential effects of GHG emissions and climate change were generally known when the original 1982 MCSP EIR and the amended 1994 MCSP IS/MND were prepared by the City. For instance, in Massachusetts v. EPA (2007), the United States Supreme Court explained the issue of global climate change began garnering governmental attention long before the City certified the 1982 MCSP EIR. The opinion in Massachusetts v. EPA (2007) states:

“In the late 1970’s, the Federal Government began devoting serious attention to the possibility that carbon dioxide emissions associated with human activity could provoke climate change. In 1978, Congress enacted the National Climate Program Act, 92 Stat. 601, which required the Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 118

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
471 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
56 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
President to establish a program to `assist the Nation and the world to understand and respond to natural and man -induced climate processes and their implications,’ [citation]. President Carter, in turn, asked the National Research Council, the working arm of the National Academy of Sciences, to investigate the subject. The Council’s response was unequivocal: `If carbon dioxide continues to increase, the study group finds no reason to doubt that climate changes will result and no reason to believe that these changes will be negligible. . . . A wait-and-see policy may mean waiting until it is too late.'" (549 U.S. at pp. 507-508.)

In addition, the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, in C.R.E.E.D. v. City of San Diego (2011), found a Supplemental EIR is not necessarily required instead of an Addendum to an EIR on the basis of GHG emissions, since information on the effects GHG emissions have on climate change were known long before the City of San Diego approved the 1994 EIR for a development project.

Furthermore, in Concerned Dublin Citizens v. the City of Dublin (2013), the Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District, found the adoption of guidelines for analyzing and evaluating the significance of data does not constitute new information of substantial importance if the underlying information was otherwise known or should have been known at the time the EIR was certified.

Since the effects of GHG emissions associated with EIR No. 329 could have been raised by the public and agencies in 1993 when the City considered the EIR, the analyses contained in this memorandum do not constitute new information of substantial importance.

For the reasons outlined above, there is no new information of substantial importance pertaining to the proposed Project, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the City certified EIR No. 329, which shows:

• The proposed Project will have one or more significant GHG effects not discussed in EIR No. 329;
• The proposed Project will result in substantially more severe significant GHG effects than previously examined in the EIR No. 329;
• There are no mitigation measures or alternatives found to be infeasible in EIR No. 329 that are now feasible and will substantially reduce significant effects of the proposed project, but are being declined for adoption by the proponent or the City; and • There are no mitigation measures or alternatives considerably different than those identified in EIR No. 329 needed to substantially reduce significant effects of the proposed project, but are being declined for adoption by the proponent or the City.

Conclusion

EIR No. 329 did not analyze GHG emissions. The proposed Project consists of a reduction in dwelling units and does not involve substantial changes that require major revisions to EIR No. 329. Therefore, GHG impacts from the proposed Project would be significant. The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 119

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
472 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 57
City of Menifee

4.9 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment through the
routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous
materials?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
b) Create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment through
reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident
conditions involving the
release of hazardous
materials into the
environment?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
c) Emit hazardous
emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials,
substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of
an existing or proposed
school?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
d) Be located on a site
which is included on a list
of hazardous materials
sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant
hazard to the public or the
environment?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
e) For a project located
within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport,
would the Project result in
a safety hazard or
excessive noise for people
residing or working in the
No Not
Analyzed No No No
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 120

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
473 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
58 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
Project area?
f) Impair implementation
of or physically interfere
with an adopted
emergency response plan
or emergency evacuation
plan?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
h) Expose people or
structures, either directly or
indirectly, to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires?
No Not
Analyzed No No No

A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was prepared for each of the proposed Project parcels by Hillman Consulting (See Appendix F). Much of t he information in this section was taken from the Phase I Environmental Site Assessments.

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Transport, Use or Disposal of Hazardous Materials. EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan would not generate any toxic waste. EIR No. 329 also noted that the industrial, commercial, and business park land uses proposed in the Planning Area require submittal of a Plot Plan, which requires applications to contain the following information:

1) A description of the proposed industrial operation in sufficient detail to fully describe the nature and extent of the proposed use.
2) Plans or reports describing proposed methods for handling traffic, noise, glare, odor, vibration, hazardous gases, liquids and other materials.
3) Plans or reports showing proposed method for treatment and disposal of sewage and industrial and toxic waste materials.

EIR No. 329 noted that mitigation of any potential impacts associated with toxic substances would be addressed at the Plot Plan stage of project development. However, EIR No. 329 noted that it is not anticipated that future industrial tenants would generate toxic substances within the Planning Area.

Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts would be less than significant.

During construction, there would be a minor level of transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes that are typical of construction projects. This would include, but is not limited to, fuels and lubricants for construction machinery, coating materials, and other building materials. Federa l, state, and local regulations associated with construction sites and use of associated hazardous materials include routine construction control measures and best management practices for hazardous materials storage, application, waste disposal, accident prevention and clean -up. These uniformly applicable standards would be sufficient to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant level. The proposed Project would develop residential subdivisions. The proposed Project consists of residential uses that do not require the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed residential uses also do not generate toxic waste. Therefore, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact with regard to the routine transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials.

(b) Reasonably Foreseeable Upset and Accident Conditions. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 121

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
474 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 59
City of Menifee
materials into the environment. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions was readily available to the public.

The proposed Project would not include demolition of any existing buildings or structures that could possibly contain asbestos or lead. According to the project Phase I ESA, there are several stockpiles of soil on the northwest portion of Planning Area 9 that would require sampling before removal off-site.

In addition, this portion of Planning Area 9 is included on the city of Menifee’s Permitted Biosolids/Sludge Application Map as a Composite Field. However, a review of the Phase I ESA boring and trench samples shows no indication whatsoever of past sludge dumping, and there are no visible piles, truck tracks, or drainage changes in the historical aerials that would suggest sludge dumping has occurred on the site. Furthermore, this portion of the planning area is not shown on any governmental database entries for any solid waste o r disposal activities. As such, no further soil sampling or testing is necessary and preparation of a Phase II ESA is not required . Finally, as a residential land use the proposed Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials. Therefore, the Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or to the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Mandatory federal, state, and local regulations would reduce the risk to the public or environment from upset and accident conditions to a less than significant level.

(c) Proximity to Schools. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to hazardous emissions or the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information a bout the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to use of hazardous materials near schools was readily available to the public.

Romoland Elementary School and Harvest Valley Elementary School are located within one-quarter mile of the Project area . As stated in section 4.9.a above, construction activities resulting from the proposed Project may involve the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous waste materials. However, construction activities are subject to uniformly applicable standards set forth by federal, state, and local agencies. Operational activities resulting from the proposed residential uses would not emit any hazardous emissions or result in the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. As a result, potential Project impacts from emitting hazardous emissions, handling hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of existing or proposed schools would be less than significant.

(d) Government Code Section 65962 . EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to Government Code Section 65962 . However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to Government Code Section 65962 was readily available to the public.

The proposed Project is not located on a site listed on the State Cortese List, a compilation of various sites throughout the State that have been compromised due to soil or groundwater contamination from past uses. Based upon review of the Cortese List, the Project site is not:

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 122

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
475 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
60 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
▪ listed as a hazardous waste and substance site by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)(Cortese List),
▪ listed as a leaking underground storage tank (LUST) site by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB),
▪ listed as a hazardous solid waste disposal site by the SWRCB, ▪ currently subject to a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) or a Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) as issued by the SWRCB, or developed with a hazardous waste facility subject to corrective action by the DTSC.

Therefore, the proposed Project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment.

(e) Airport Land Use Plan. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to airport hazards. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to projects located within an airport land use plan was readily available to the public.

There are no public airports or private airstrips within two miles of the Project site. The nearest airport is the Perris Valley Airport, which is more than three miles to the northwest of the Project area . No impacts related to airport hazards would occur.

(g) Emergency Plans. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to impairment or physical interference with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to impairment of emergency plans was readily available to the public.

Pursuant to state Fire and Building Codes, sufficient space would have to be provided around the proposed residential structures for emergency personnel and equipment access and emergency evacuation. All Project elements, including landscaping, would be sited with sufficient clearance from proposed structures so as not to interfere with emergency access to and evacuation from structures.

The proposed Project also includes improvements to Palomar Road in order to provide access to TTM 38312.The Project also includes extension of Malone Avenue south of Watson Road to Varela Lane and the extension of Calle de Caballos in order to provide access to TTM 38133. However, the Project does not propose the closure of any roadways. The Project is required to comply with the California Fire Code as adopted by the Menifee Municipal Code. Internal roads within the proposed residential subdivisions would allow emergency access and evacuation from the site and would be constructed per California Fire Code specifications. The proposed Project would provide adequate maneuvering space for emergency response vehicles (e.g. , fire trucks). The refore, the Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan.

Impacts would be less than significant.

(h) Wildfire Risks. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to wildfire risks. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to wildfire risks was readily available to the public.

According to the latest Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE) , the Specific Plan area , including the Project site, is not Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 123

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
476 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 61
City of Menifee
designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone in a Local Responsibility Area (LRA). Therefore, impacts related to wildfire would be less than significant.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 did not analyze cumulative impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials. The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project site with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would be required to comply with all federal, state, and local regulations pertaining to the handling, transport, and disposal of hazardous waste and materials.

Therefore, proposed Project’s cumulative hazards and hazardous materials impacts would be less than significant.

Conclusion

As outlined above, the Project has no impact or less than significant impacts related to hazardous materials, airport hazards, or wildfires. The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation measures are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 124

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
477 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
62 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

4.10 – Hydrology and Water Quality
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Violate any water quality
standards or waste
discharge requirements or
otherwise substantially
degrade surface or ground
water supply?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
b) Substantially decrease
groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such
that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater
management of the basin?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
c) Substantially alter the
existing drainage pattern of
the site or area, including
through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river,
or through the addition of
impervious surfaces, in a
manner which would:

i) result in substantial
erosion or siltation on-
or off-site;
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
ii) substantially
increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff
in a manner which
would result in flooding
on- or off-site;
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
iii) create or contribute
runoff water which
would exceed the
capacity of existing or
planned stormwater
drainage systems or
provide substantial
additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 125

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
478 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 63
City of Menifee
iv) impede or redirect
flood flows? Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
d) In flood hazard,
tsunami, or seiche zones,
risk release of pollutants
due to project inundation?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
e) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of a water
quality control plan or
sustainable groundwater
management plan?
No Not
Analyzed No No No

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Violate Water Quality Standards or Degrade the Water Supply. EIR No. 329 noted that due to the present agricultural use of the Planning Area , it is anticipated that runoff would likely contain agricultural pollutants, such as fertilizers, pesticides, etc. EIR No. 329 also noted that runoff entering the storm drain system would contain minor amounts of pollutants typical of urban use, including pesticides, fertilizers, oil and rubber residues, detergents, hydrocarbon particles and other debris. EIR No. 329 found that this runoff, typical of urban use, would contribute to the incremental degradation of water quality downstream. Pursuant to requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board, EIR No. 329 found that a state -wide general National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) construction permit would apply to all construction activities within the Planning Area. EIR No. 329 noted that the developer or builder would be required to obtain the appropriate NPDES construction permit prior to commencing grading activities, and all development within the Specific Plan boundaries would be subject to future requirements adopted by the County to implement the NPDES program. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts to water quality or degradation of the water supply would be less than significant with adherence to existing regulations.

The proposed Project could have an impact on surface water quality if discharges associated with the Project would create pollution, contamination, or nuisance as defined in Water Code Section 13050, or if the Project would cause regulatory standards to be violated as defined in the applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit or Water Quality Control Plan for a receiving water body. For the purpose of this issue, a significant impact could occur if the p roposed Project would discharge water that does not meet the quality standards of the agencies which regulate surface water quality and water discharge into stormwater drainage systems. Significant impacts could also occur if the proposed Project does not comply with all applicable regulations with regard to surface water quality as governed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). These regulations include preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Water Qu ality Management Plan (WQMP) to reduce construction and post -construction water quality impacts. A project-specific WQMP would be prepared for Project parcels to address water quality impacts from operational activities. The WQMP would be prepared consistent with the requirements contained in the Riverside County Water Quality Management Plan for the Santa Ana River Region or other requirements as established by the RWQCB (Santa Ana Region). Implementation responsibilities for the measures contained in the Project -specific WQMP must be clearly detailed. A discussion of the proposed Project’s construction and operation water quality impacts is provided below.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 126

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
479 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
64 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
Construction Impacts
Three general sources of potential short-term, construction-related stormwater pollution associated with the proposed Project include: 1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing pollutants; 2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and 3) earth-moving activities which, when not controlled, may generate soil erosion via sto rm runoff or mechanical equipment. The proposed Project would disturb approximately 60 acres of land and would be subject to NPDES permit requirements during construction activities. Pursuant to the Menifee Municipal Code Sec. 15.01.015, new development or development projects shall control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing uses of the water. The Project applicant is also required to prepare an SWPPP designed to reduce construction -related stormwater pollution to the maximum extent practicable. Implementation of the Project SWPPP would ensure that construction-related water quality impacts are less than significant.

Operational Impacts
Construction of the proposed Project would permanently increase impervious area on the Project site.

The proposed Project would be subject to post -construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address increases in impervious surfaces, methods to decrease incremental increases in off -site stormwater flows, and methods for decreasing pollutant loading in off-site discharges as required by the applicable NPDES requirements. Common post-construction BMPs include filtering stormwater through vegetated areas or into collection ponds prior to discharging into the City’s storm drain system. The proposed residential uses would not generate hazardous wastewater that would require any special waste discharge permits.

The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) outlines site design BMPs, source control BMPs, and treatment control BMPs to protect water quality. Site design BMPs include directing primary flow to water quality basins prior to discharge in offsite storm drains, preserving the existing secondary drainage pattern (which flows in a northeasterly direction), and minimizing impervious area to the extent feasible and replacing with planting/landscaping. Source control BMPs include the following: providing integrated pest management (IPM) information to new owners, lessees, and operators; installing grease interceptors for drains located within food service operations; designing site drainage to flow away from trash enclosures and minimize runoff from trash enclosures; and sweeping plazas, sidewalks, and parking lots regularly to prevent accumulation of litter and debris and to prevent trash entry into the storm drain system. Treatment control BMPs include removing pollutants of con cern via bioretention basins. Water quality basins would be highly effective at removing the following pollutants of concern:
bacterial indicators, metals, nutrients, pesticides, toxic organic compounds (solvents and petroleum hydrocarbons), and sediments. With implementation of a combination of site design BMPs, source control BMPs, and treatment control BMPs, water quality impacts related to operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. Implementation of these measures would ensure that the proposed Project c omplies with federal, state, and local regulatory requirements and would reduce water quality impacts to less than significant levels.

(b) Groundwater Supplies. EIR No. 329 noted that several water lines exist in the Planning Area, and development of the Specific Plan would require the existing water system to be expanded by placing new water mains on all proposed streets as well as extending new mains on existing streets to complete a looped watermain system. It was also noted that EMWD indicated that the Menifee North Specific Plan would be required to participate in the cost of the construction of a 5 million gallon water storage tank. A preliminary Plan of Services, dated November 1 9, 1992 was prepared by Eastern Municipal Water District. This Plan of Services provides updated estimates of project related water demands by pressure zone. It also provides preliminary design concepts for the provision of domestic and reclaimed water and sewer service to the Menifee North and Menifee Ranch Specific Plans. EIR No. 329 also anticipated that EMWD would require the Specific Plan to construct a system of "dry" reclaimed water Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 127

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
480 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 65
City of Menifee
lines so the Specific Plan can ultimately utilize reclaimed water for specific irrigation upon completion of the necessary facility construction bringing reclaimed water near the area. EIR No. 329 noted that the District was constructing reclaimed water system facilities which include Winchester area holding ponds located at the intersection of Simpson and Leon Roads (approximately one -half to one mile southeast of the subject project), a transmission pipeline aligned generally along Winchester and Leon Roads extending from the District's Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility (TVRWRF) (located in the City of Temecula) to the Winchester area holding ponds, and pumping facilities located along the transmission pipeline. EIR No. 329 found that the design and construction of off-site and on- site reclaimed water system improvements would be necessary to accomplish the delivery of reclaimed water to the Planning Area. EIR No. 329 noted that developers must submit information that describes estimates of reclaimed water demand, and landscape/irrigation conceptual plans to the District for evaluation. At the time of the District's evaluation, a determination would be made regarding District requirements for reclaimed water use and system improvements by the developer. EIR No. 329 found that the District's facilities Master Plan indicated that off-site pipelines would be aligned along Simpson Road west of Leon Road, and logically along Briggs Road and/or Menifee Road north of Simpson Road to the Planning Area. Also, a pipeline may be aligned along the AT&SF railroad extending from the PVRWRF, through the Planning Area, to Menifee Road.

EIR No. 329 determined that t he payment of fees to EMWD would prevent any negative financial impacts to the District. It was noted that EMWD would collect a maximum of $3,500 per unit from developers in the area for construction of the Romoland Treatment Plant Expansion, all lines would be designed per EMWD requirements , and t he infrastructural system would be installed to the requirements of the County's Engineering Department. In addition, it was noted that the following State laws require water efficient plumbing fixtures in structures to minimize water use in the Planning Area:

• Health and Safety Code Section 17921.3 requires low -flush toilets and urinals in virtually all buildings.
• Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 1604(0 (Appliance Efficiency Standards) establishes efficiency standards that set the maximum flow rate of all new showerheads, lavatory faucets, etc.
• Title 20, California Administrative Code Section 160l(b) (Appliance Efficiency Standards) prohibits the sale of fixtures that do not comply with regulations. • Title 24, California Adminisl:1 -ative Code Section 2 -5307(b) (California Energy Conservation Standards for New Buildings) prohibits the installation of fixtures unless the manufacturer has certified to the CEC compliance with the flow rate standards. • Title 24, California .Administrative Code Sections 2 -5452(i) and (j) address pipe insulation requirements, which can reduce water used before hot water reaches equipment or fixtures. • Health and Safety Code Section 4047 prohibits installation of residential water softening or conditioning appliances unless certain conditions are satisfied. • Government Code Section 7800 specifies that lavatories in all public facilities be equipped with self-closing faucets that limit flow of hot water.

Additionally, EIR No. 329 found that water demands would be further mitigated through implementation of Water and Sewer Plan Development Standards of the Specific Plan. For these reasons, EIR No. 329 determined that water-related impacts would be less than significant.

If the proposed Project removes an existing groundwater recharge area or substantially reduces runoff that results in groundwater recharge such that existing wells would no longer be able to operate, a potentially significant impact could occur. Impacts to groundwater could also occur if the proposed Project substantially depletes groundwater supplies. However, Project-related grading would not reach Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 128

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
481 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
66 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
groundwater depths and no disturbance of groundwater is anticipated. The proposed Project would increase impervious surface coverage in the area , thereby reducing the total amount of infiltration.

However, infiltration of irrigation water through soil and water from runoff through infiltration basins would ensure continued groundwater recharge in Menifee as impervious surfaces increase. The Specific Plan area is not utilized for groundwater recharge and would include landscaped areas that would serve as infiltration. Because this Project area is not managed for groundwater supplies and the Project would provide landscaped areas for continued infiltration, this change in infiltration would not have a significant effect on groundwater table level. For these reasons, Project-related i mpacts to groundwater supplies would be less than significant.

(c.i) Substantial Erosion or Siltation. EIR No. 329 noted that implementation of the Menifee North Specific Plan would alter the composition of surface runoff by grading site surfaces, by construction of impervious streets, roofs and parking facilities, and by irrigation of landscaped areas. However, EIR No. 329 incorporated mitigation requiring erosion to be controlled by positive drainage of the Planning Area and planting of erosion-resistant vegetation. With incorporation of mitigation, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts related to drainage would be less than significant.

Development of the proposed Project would affect the drainage system and would result in greater areas of impervious surfaces (such as streets, sidewalks and parking lots) in the Specific Plan area .

Instead of absorbing into the ground, water on impervious surfaces runs -off and drains into the local drainage system, potentially increasing the amount of storm water runoff. Potentially significant impacts to the existing drainage pattern of the site or area could occur if development of the proposed Project results in substantial on- or off-site erosion or siltation. As such, the proposed Project would be required to adhere to the requirements of mitigation measures MM-C.2.1 through MM-C.2.5. The Project would include stormwater and drainage improvements that would direct stormwater into the municipal stormwater collection system. Project roadways would include a series of stormwater conveyance pipes and proposed residential developments would include stormwater drainage that would direct stormwater into the st ormwater conveyance system beneath the roadways . Therefore, the drainage pattern would not be substantially altered in a manner tha t could cause increases in erosion off -site.

Erosion and siltation reduction measures would be included in the Project design and implemented during construction. At the completion of construction, the Project would consist of impervious surfaces and would therefore not be prone to substantial erosion. Finally, the Project would not alter the course of a river or stream. With incorporation of mitigation measure s MM-C.2.1 through MM-C.2.5, impacts related to erosion and siltation would be less than significant.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-C.2.1 Positive drainage of the site shall be provided, and water shall not be allowed to pond behind or flow over any cut and fill slopes. Where water is collected in a common area and discharged, protection of the native soils shall be provided by planting erosion resistant vegetation, as the native soils are susceptible to erosion by running water.

MM-C.2.3 Maximum inclination of all cut and fill slopes shall be 2 horizontal to 1 vertical.

MM-C.2.4 Final determination of the foundation characteristics of soils within on-site development areas shall be performed by a geotechnical engineer.

MM-C.2.5 Prior to issuance of grading permits, a seismic refraction survey shall be conducted to evaluate the rippability characteristics of the bedrock on-site indicating the approximate rippability of the bedrock materials at various depths for grading purposes.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 129

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
482 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 67
City of Menifee
(c.ii) Flooding from Runoff. EIR No. 329 noted that there were no existing storm drain facilities located within the boundaries of the Specific Plan at the time it was written. However, EIR No. 329 noted that south of State Highway 74 and near the eastern end of the Planning Area were three separate underground reinforced concrete pipe systems between Sultanas Avenue and Leon Road, which acted to de-water existing development as well as off -site flows. It was noted that t hese systems discharge their flows into the existing golf course channel located east of the Planning Area, as shown on Figure III-5, Regional Drainage Plan of the Specific Plan. EIR No. 329 also noted that Line 1C of the Homeland Master Drainage Plan ( MDP), reaching from Mapes Road north to Alicante Avenue , existed as a concrete lined trapezoidal channel with a depth of four feet, bottom width of four feet, and 1.5:1 side slopes. It was also noted that there existed approximately 850 lineal feet of Line 1B reaching from Alicante Avenue to the south, constructed as a concrete lined trapezoidal channel. ln addition, several low flow pipe culverts were noted to exist at various locations along State Highway 74 conveying storm flows underneath the roadway. However, it was found that these culverts were interim in nature and were not considered adequate to handle flows from a major storm event , and that the construction of proposed MDP facilities could mitigate this drainage problem.

EIR No. 329 found that development of the Menifee North Specific Plan would result in increased runoff due to the creation of impervious surfaces, and it was estimated that for the developed condition, 100- year storm flows would increase by 15-20%, increasing downstream flows in the San Jacinto River. EIR No. 329 noted that Figure V-7, Master Drainage Plan of the Specific Plan, depicts the proposed MDP for Menifee North, which ha d been designed to accommodate on -site and tributary flows, providing protection from 100-year storm. It was noted that plan proposed alternative alignments to those shown on the Romoland and Homeland MDPs at the time, but that the Specific Plan proposed the construction of MDP improvements. In addition, EIR No. 329 found that d ue to increased runoff, on-site retention basins would be required to be constructed.

EIR No. 329 noted that all improvements would be constructed in accordance with the standards of the Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD), and t he Specific Plan incorporates MDP improvements designed to reduce the impacts of increased surface runoff and provide 100 -year flood protection to the Planning Area . EIR No. 329 anticipated that many of those facilities would be constructed as part of the conditions of approval and at the discretion of the RCFCD. It was further noted that credit against drainage fees would be given to developer for all ADP facilities constructed to serve the Planning Area . EIR No. 329 found that t he Planning Area lies within the boundaries of the Homeland and Romoland Area Drainage Plans and would be subject to a per acre assessment fee, thereby contributing to regional drainage mitigation programs in the area. If required by RCFCD, EIR No. 329 noted that a floodplain analysis for existing conditions would be performed to the satisfaction of the RCFCD and utilizing the Corps of Engineers HEC-2 computer program. As development occurs within the floodplain, EIR No. 329 noted that t he alteration of the floodplain must also be determined under developed conditions. As such, it was anticipated that the RCFCD may require that the MDP's for Homeland and Romoland be revised to better reflect changes in land use, zoning and changes in hydrological data used to calculate peak flow rates, and the MDP's should be revised to work in harmony with the proposed Specific Plan. Finally, EIR No. 329 found that the Area Drainage Plan for both MDP's should also be revised to reflect new costs in construction of proposed storm drain facilities, consequently updating the drainage fee schedule. In order to mitigate potential downstream impacts resulting from increased project flows, EIR No. 329 noted that the use of detention basins would be required. Therefore, with adherence to the standards of the RCF CD, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts would be less than significant.

Potentially significant impacts to the existing drainage pattern of the site or area could occur if development of the proposed Project results in substantial on- or off-site erosion or siltation, substantial flooding, provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, or impede or redirect flood flows. The Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 130

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
483 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
68 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
Salt Creek Flood Control Channel and its tributaries can effectively control flood hazards in the area.

The Project would include drainage facilities that would be designed and constructed with sufficient capacity to safely convey additional stormwater flows and thereby ensure that no habitable structure would be placed within a 100-year floodplain as shown on the FEMA Insurance Rate Maps. Therefore, impacts related to flooding would be less than significant.

(c.iii) Stormwater Drainage Capacity. EIR No. 329 noted that all improvements would be constructed in accordance with the standards of the Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD), and t he Specific Plan incorporates MDP improvements designed to reduce the impacts of increased surface runoff and provide 100-year flood protection to the Planning Area. EIR No. 329 anticipated that many of those facilities would be constructed as part of the conditions of approval and at the discretion of the RCFCD. It was further noted that credit against drainage fees would be given to developer for all ADP facilities constructed to serve the Planning Area. EIR No. 329 found that the Planning Area lies within the boundaries of the Homeland and Romoland Area Drainage Plans and would be subject to a per acre assessment fee, thereby contributing to regional drainage mitigation programs in the area.

Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that impacts related to stormwater runoff would be less than significant.

Potentially significant impacts to the existing drainage pattern of the site or area could occur if development of the proposed Project results in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.

Development of the proposed Project would increase the net area of impermeable surfaces; therefore, increased discharges to the City’s existing storm drain system would likely occur . However, the proposed Project would include stormwater improvements. Stormwater would be collected on-site in storm drains , retaine d on site if necessary, and conveyed to the City’s storm drainage system as capacity allows. The drainage improvements would be constructed in accordance with the MDP and the RCFCD’s requirements. Permits to connect to the existing storm drainage system would be obtained prior to construction of the proposed Project. All drainage plans are subject to City review and approval.

Therefore, the increase in discharges would not impact local storm drain capacity. In addition, t he proposed Project is not an industrial use and therefore would not result in substantial pollutant loading such that treatment control BMPs would be required to protect downstream water quality. Impacts related to polluted runoff would be less than significant.

(c.iv) Impede or Redirect Flood Flows. EIR No. 329 noted that, if required by RCFCD, a floodplain analysis for existing conditions would be performed to the satisfaction of the RCFCD and utilizing the Corps of Engineers HEC -2 computer program. As development occurs within the floodplain, EIR No. 329 noted that the alteration of the floodplain must also be determined under developed conditions. As such, it was anticipated that the RCFCD may require that the MDP's for Homeland and Romoland be revised to better reflect changes in land use, zoning and changes in hydrological data used to calculate peak flow rates. Finally, EIR No. 329 noted that MDP's should be revised to work in harmony with the proposed Specific Plan . With adherence to these measures, EIR No. 329 determined that flooding impacts would be less than significant.

Potentially significant impacts to the existing drainage pattern of the site or area could occur if development of the proposed Project impede s or redirect s flood flows. Development of additional residential uses in the Specific Plan area must comply with existing programs aimed to reduce flooding hazards. These programs include: 1) participation in the National Flood Insurance Program; 2) coordination with the RCFCWCD to ensure maintenance of flood control channels and completion of necessary repairs to RC FCWCD-owned facilities on an as -needed basis; and 3) maintenance of emergency procedures in accordance with Section 8589.5 of the California Government Code. With adherence to these measures, impacts related to impediment or redirection of flood flows from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 131

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
484 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 69
City of Menifee
(d) Other Water -Related Risks or Pollution. Impacts related to flood hazards are discussed in response 4.10.c.i – 4.10.c.iv above. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to tsunami, seiche zones, or risk of release of pollutants due to project inundation. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about hydrology and water quality impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to other flooding related risks was readily available to the public.

The City is not exposed to tsunami hazards due to its inland location, and there are no reservoirs are waterbodies located in the vicinity of the Project that could result in seiche. The Project site is, however, located in the dam inundation zone of the Diamond Valley Lake . There are three dams that make up Diamond Valley Lake – East Dam, West Dam, and Saddle Dam. Failure of any of these dams would cause the Project area to be inundated, and there is a high hazard potential given the extent of development in this area (Menifee, 2010). Diamond Valley lake is the largest reservoir in southern California, with a capacity of 800,000 acre feet of water. The most likely cause for dam failure is a large earthquake occurring on one of the nearby active faults, such as the San Jacinto fault zone. According to the City of Menifee General Plan DEIR (page 5.9-23), “at capacity fill, the three dams that impound the reservoir were each designed to withstand an earthquake of 7.5 magnitude along the San Jacinto Fault or an earthquake of 8.0 magnitude along the San Andreas Fault” (Menifee, 2013a). In addition, the “Metropolitan Water District of Southern California carries out continuous automated monitoring of the dams and their foundations for deformation due to the weight of the dams, water pressure, and the effects of wetting of dam materials. The design and construction of the dams for earthquake resistance, in combination with monitoring of the dams, reduce risks of dam failure due to earthquakes.” Therefore, impacts related to dam inundation would be less than significant.

(e) Conflict with Water Quality or Groundwater Management Plans. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to conflicts with or obstruction of implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan . However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about hazards and hazardous materials impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information a bout the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to conflicts with water quality or groundwater management plans was readily available to the public.

The Regional Board's Basin Plan is designed to preserve and enhance water quality and protect the beneficial uses of all regional waters. Specifically, the Basin Plan (i) designates beneficial uses for surface and ground waters, (ii) sets narrative and numerical objectives that must be a ttained or maintained to protect the designated beneficial uses and conform to the State's anti-degradation policy, and (iii) describes implementation programs to protect all waters in the region. Development allowed by the Project would be required to adhere to requirements of the water quality control plan, including all existing regulation and permitting requirements. This would include the incorporation of best management practices (BMPs) to protect water quality during c onstruction and operational periods. Development of the Project would also be subject to all existing water quality regulations and programs, including all applicable construction permits. Existing General Plan policies related to water quality would also be applicable to the Project. General Plan Conservation Element, Objectives 7.1 and

7.2 and their associated policies would limit potential water quality impacts to surface water and groundwater resources. General Plan Policy 7.2.2 requires all projects to comply with the discharge permit requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Implementation of these policies, in conjunction with compliance with existing regulatory programs, would ensure that water quality impacts related to the Project would be less than significant.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 132

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
485 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
70 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 noted that Drainage patterns and the quality, velocity and composition of runoff would be altered by large scale grading of areas planned for construction, as well as the creation of impervious surfaces (such as roadways, driveways, parking lots, etc.) It was further noted that runoff could increase flows in the Salt Creek and ultimately the San Jacinto River, potentially impacting downstream capacity.

Runoff entering Salt Creek and the San Jacinto River would contain minor amounts of pollutants typical of urban use, thereby impacting the downstream water quality in the area, including the Lake Elsinore State Recreation Area. EIR No. 329 found that s iltation resulting from exposed ground surfaces from grading also may affect downstream water quality , and i nfiltration of water used for irrigation of landscaped areas throughout the vicinity may affect the abundance and distribution of groundwater.

EIR No. 329 anticipated that storm drain systems would be constructed in accordance with the County's Master Drainage Plan in order to mitigate impacts on local drainage patterns. EIR No. 329 found that the Menifee North Specific Plan and the Menifee Ranch Specific Plans are within the boundaries of the Homeland/Romoland Area Drainage Plan and would be subject to drainage fees established by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. EIR No. 329 noted that preparation of a water quality impact analysis for all subdivisions in the San Jacinto River drainage area is considered beyond the scope of a single developer, and that Section 15130(c) of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act states that, "With some projects, the only feasible mitigation for cumulative impacts may involve the adoption of ordinances or regulations rather than the imposition of conditions on a project-by-project basis". As such, EIR No. 329 determined that water quality impacts related to sedimentation would be controlled through the use of erosion control devices during grading, and l ong term water quality impact s related to urban pollutants could best be mitigated through ordinances or regulations, rather than on a project-by-project basis. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that cumulative hydrology and water quality impacts could be reduced to less than significant through compliance with the requirements of the California State Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region.

The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project site with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the requirements of the Santa Ana RWQCB. Therefore, the cumulative hydrology and water quality impacts from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Conclusion

EIR No. 329 concludes that development of the Menifee North Specific Plan, including the proposed Project parcels, would not have significant impacts on hydrology, water quality, and other water-related resources and constraints with adherence to existing regulations, and no mitigation was recommended.

With regulatory compliance, the preceding sections have demonstrated the proposed Project would also not have any significant water -related impacts. The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 133

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
486 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 71
City of Menifee

4.11 – Land Use and Planning
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Physically divide an
established community? No Not
Analyzed No No No
b) Cause a significant
environmental impact due to
a conflict with any land use
plan, policy, or regulation
adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
No Not
Analyzed No No No

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Divide an Established Community. EIR No. 329 did not analyze whether the Specific Plan would physically divide an established community. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about land use policy impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to physical division of an established community was readily available to the public.

The proposed Project is within the scope of the Menifee North Specific Plan. The Project site consists of approximately 60 acres of undeveloped land that is adjacent to existing development, roadway features, and open space . TTM 38132 would improvements to Palomar Way, but would not include extension of any roadways . TTM 38133 includes improvements to Malone Avenue and extension of Calle de Caballos, which would be the access point to the site. However, the Project does not propose the closure of any roadways or the construction of any new roadways or features that would physically divide an established community. Therefore, the Project would have no impact.

(b) Conflict with Applicable Plans. EIR No. 329 did not analyze whether the Specific Plan would cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about land use policy impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to conflicts with land use plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect was readily available to the public.

The proposed Project is within the scope of the Menifee North Specific Plan and includes slightly less development capacity than was analyzed in EIR No. 329. The proposed Project is therefore consistent with the growth limits evaluated in EIR No. 329. The Project is also consistent with the permitted land uses in the Specific Plan. Therefore, impacts related to land use plans are less than significant, and no mitigation is required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 134

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
487 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
72 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan is located within an area undergoing rapid urbanization as a result of demand pressures for housing, as was occurring in most of Riverside County, and that a number of other major projects were pending in the project area at the time of certification .

EIR No. 329 also noted that including the Menifee North Specific Plan, the other major developments in the area cumulatively proposed approximately 32,500 dwelling units, generating an estimated population of 84,175 persons. In addition to the residential elements of these projects, EIR No. 329 found that these projects included an estimated total of 850 acres of Town Center, Commercial, Business Park and/or Industrial use. EIR No. 329 found that the 2,654 units proposed by the Menifee North Specific Plan constitute 8.2% of the total dwelling units proposed and approved in the City. While the individual projects may contribute marginally to growth in the area, EIR No. 329 determined that the collective projects would cumulatively create an overall change in the once rural and sparsely populated nature of the Sun City/Menifee Valley and Romoland/Homeland region. EIR No. 329 also determined that the overall increase in units and related demands along neighborhood roads and for local services and utilities would cumulatively impact the area. In addition, it was noted that development of these projects in what was once a semi -rural/ agricultural but steadily developing area could result in conversion of adjoining lands to similar uses, particularly agricultural and open space uses remaining in the area. Therefore, it was found that ultimate urbanization of the project vicinity could potentially indirectly influence expansion throughout the area. However, EIR No. 329 determined that cumulative projects constructed within the Specific Plan area and conforming to County General Plan and zoning designations would have impacts anticipated by the General Plan EIR , and would not create adverse cumulative land use and planning impacts.

The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project parcels with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would not physically divide an established community or cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect .

Therefore, the proposed Project would not create adverse cumulative land use and planning impacts.

Conclusion

The Project is consistent with the Specific Plan evaluated in EIR No. 329 , and includes slightly less development potential than was analyzed in EIR No. 329. Therefore, impacts related to land use plans are less than significant. The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 135

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
488 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 73
City of Menifee

4.12 – Mineral Resources
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Result in the loss of
availability of a known
mineral resource that would
be of value to the region
and the residents of the
state?
Yes No Impact No No No
b) Result in the loss of
availability of a locally-
important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on
a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
Yes No Impact No No No

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Designated Mineral Resources . EIR No. 329 did not identify any mineral resources within the Planning Area. EIR No. 329 also noted that the Mineral Resources Element of the General Plan does not indicate the presence of resources within the Planning Area. Additionally, EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan does not propose any future land uses which impact mineral resources in Riverside County. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined there would be no impacts to mineral resources.

The California Department of Conservation Mineral Lands Classification map for the Specific Plan area shows the area is located within a mineral resource zone area classified as MRZ-1. Areas classified as MRZ-1 are defined as areas where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence . The Specific Plan area was historically used for agriculture prior to development and there are no known mineral resources in the immediate vicinity. There are no mining operations in the Specific Plan area, and implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of known mineral resources.

(b) Local Mineral Designations. EIR No. 329 did not identify any mineral resources within the Planning Area. EIR No. 329 also noted that the Mineral Resources Element of the General Plan does not indicate the presence of resources within the Planning Area. Additionally, EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan does not propose any future land uses which impact mineral resources in Riverside County. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined there would be no impacts to mineral resources.

The California Department of Conservation Mineral Lands Classification map for the Specific Plan area shows the area is located within a mineral resource zone area classified as MRZ-1. Areas classified as MRZ-1 are defined as areas where adequate information indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present, or where it is judged that little likelihood exists for their presence. The Specific Plan area was historically used for agriculture prior to development and there are no known mineral resources in Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 136

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
489 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
74 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
the immediate vicinity. There are no mining operations in the Specific Plan area, and implementation of the Project would not result in the loss of known mineral resources.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 did not analyze cumulative impacts related to mineral resources. EIR No. 329 did not identify any mineral resources within the Planning Area. EIR No. 329 also noted that the Mineral Resources Element of the General Plan does not indicate the presence of resources within the Planning Area. Additionally, EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan does not propose any future land uses which impact mineral resources in Riverside County. The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbani zing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project parcels with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project is within the scope of the Menifee North Specific Plan and would not result in the loss of mineral res ources. Therefore, the cumulative mineral resources impact from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Conclusion

The Specific Plan area does not contain identified mineral resources either at a state level or local level that can be reasonably extracted given existing onsite and surrounding land uses. Therefore, there would be no impacts regarding mineral resources . The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation is required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 137

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
490 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 75
City of Menifee

4.13 – Noise
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Generation of a
substantial temporary or
permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in
excess of standards
established in the local
general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable
standards of other
agencies?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
b) Generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
c) For a project located
within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport
land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or public use
airport, would the project
expose people residing or
working in the project area
to excessive noise levels?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Noise Exceeds Standards.

EIR No. 329 evaluated noise from construction, off-site traffic, and on-site traffic.

Construction Noise
EIR No. 329 found that construction noise would be short -term and would be reduced by limiting construction hours. There have been no substantial changes to the environmental setting of PA-9 and PA-22, although Plan development has proceeded over time. Pot ential sensitive noise receptors continue to be located approximately 60 feet west of PA-9 across Palomar Road, and at the border of PA-9 to the north. Residential receptors are approximately 50 feet west of PA-22 across Malone Avenue PA-22 and approximate ly 90 feet north of PA -22 across Watson Road. Harvest Valley Elementary School is approximately 230 feet east of PA-22. EIR No. 329 concluded the potential construction noise impacts would be less than significant with the incorporation of MM-C.5.1, as follows:

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 138

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
491 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
76 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
MM-C.5.1 Construction adjacent to existing residential development shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday. Construction should not be allowed on weekends or federal holidays.

Since certification of EIR No. 329, the City has incorporated, adopting a General Plan and Municipal Code provisions. The proposed Project would also be required to comply with Municipal Code Section

8.01.010, as follows:

• 8.01.010 Hours of Construction: Any construction within the city located within one -fourth mile from an occupied residence shall be permitted Monday through Saturday, except nationally recognized holidays, 6:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. There shall be no construct ion permitted on Sunday or nationally recognized holidays unless approval is obtained from the City Building Official or City Engineer.

The continued incorporation of MM-C.5.1 and compliance with the City’s Municipal Code would limit the time when construction activities are permitted occur and ensure the proposed Project does not result in a new or more severe construction noise impact than identified in EIR No. 329.

Operational Off-Site Traffic Noise
EIR No. 329 found that the development of the Menifee North Specific Plan could increase traffic noise levels along Antelope Road, Mapes Road, and Route 74 to levels above 65 CNEL, which was considered a significant and unavoidable impact to existing residences along the roadways. As shown in Table 5.12 -3 of the 2013 Menifee General Plan EIR, 65 CNEL is still conditionally acceptable for residential land uses. Based on the location of the proposed Project, trips from PA-9 and PA-22 would primarily be added to Route 74. According to the 2013 Menifee General Plan EIR, which incorporates the growth evaluated in EIR No. 329, traffic noise levels on the road segments of Route 74 along PA-9 and PA -22 are predicted to exceed 65 CNEL under existing and 2035 conditions. However, the proposed Project would result in less VMT as compared to EIR No. 329 (Translutions 2022). With less traffic, the proposed Project would not contribute a greater incremental share to cumulative traffic noise levels than was approved in EIR No. 329. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in a new or more severe noise impact.

Operational On-Site Traffic Noise
Using a threshold of 65 CNEL for outdoor residential exposure and 45 CNEL for indoor noise levels, EIR No. 329 found that residences along Menifee Road, Briggs Road, and Route 74 could be exposed to significant and unavoidable traffic noise levels. Since t he certification of EIR No. 329, traffic levels have increased, and so the proposed Project would continue contribute to potentially unacceptable traffic noise levels. However, as discussed in Operational Off -Site Traffic Noise above, the proposed Project would result in lower trips and VMT as compared to EIR No. 329, and so would not contribute more to traffic noise levels than what was approved in EIR No. 329. Additionally, traffic noise modeling for the 2013 Menifee General Plan EIR indicates that residences at PA -9 and PA -22 would not be exposed to traffic noise volumes exceeding 65 CNEL. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in a new or more severe noise impact.

(b) Excessive Vibration. EIR No. 329 did not directly evaluate vibration levels. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about land use policy impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to physical division of an established community was readily available to the public.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 139

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
492 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 77
City of Menifee
The proposed Project would not include substantial construction or operational activities that could generate sustained groundborne vibration levels at existing residential buildings that could result in building damage or sustained human annoyance. Construction would not invo lve equipment, such as pile drivers, that would be likely to cause substantial vibration. Equipment would at worst-case operate adjacent to the site’s property lines and within approximately 25 feet of the nearest residential building (to the north) of PA -9, but would generally take place 100 feet or more from the nearest residential building. In PA-22, the nearest residential buildings are across Malone Avenue to the west and across Watson Road to the north, over 50 feet from the property boundary. The nearest school building is over 230 feet to the east of PA-22. The incorporation of MM-C.5.1 and compliance with City Municipal Code requirements (see Section a. above) would limit construction hours adjacent to existing residential development to daytime periods only when people are less sensitive to potential groundborne vibrations. Once operati onal, the proposed Project would not have any large equipment that would generate vibration. Therefore, the proposed Project would not generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels, and would result in a less than significant impact.

(c) Airport/Airstrip Noise. Based on the County of Riverside Airport Noise Impact Area Map, which used a 1979 study to establish noise contours, EIR No. 329 found Planning Areas 4, 5, 6 and 9 were within the 65 CNEL zone for March Air Force Base (March AFB), and that a significant impact would occur. However, since certification of EIR No. 329, new information has been developed that indicates the City of Menifee (including PA-9 and PA-22) is not located within the 65 dBA CNEL noise contours of any airport, including March AFB (City of Menifee 2013). March AFB is located approximately 10.4 miles northwest of PA -9. There are no airports located within two miles of PA -9 or PA-22. Therefore, the proposed Project would not expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels, and would result in a less than significant impact.

Cumulative Impacts
EIR No. 329 expected that cumulative construction noise would be mitigated, as a result of the physical distance between proposed projects. EIR No. 329 found that the projects would result in higher traffic volumes, which would increase noise levels along major roadways. Cumulatively, EIR No. 329 estimated that a significant (3dBA) noise increase would occur along State Rout e 74, I-215, Menifee Road, Encanto Drive, Antelope Road, Mapes Road, Watson Road, Briggs Road, Lindenberger Road, McCall Boulevard, Simpson Road and Newport Road. Traffic volumes associated with cumulative Project impacts were estimated to exceed 65 CNEL along Antelope Road, Mapes Road and Route 74, and could expose residences along Route 74 to noise levels exceeding 65 CNEL. EIR No. 329 stated that all proposed development in the area would be required to achieve interior noise levels of 45 dB CNEL and outdoor noise levels less than 65 CNEL, and may use mitigation such as sound walls or building sound insulation. The proposed Project would not result in an incremental increase in Project or cumulative traffic noise levels as compared to EIR No. 329, for the reasons discussed in Section a) above. Therefore, the proposed Project would not result in a new or more severe cumulative noise impact.

Conclusion

EIR No. 329 found that implementation of the Menifee Specific Plan would result in a substantial increase in ambient noise levels. The proposed Project would involve less intense development than what was evaluated in EIR No. 329, and would not result in additional noise or vibration impacts.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 140

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
493 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
78 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

4.14 – Population and Housing
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Induce substantial
unplanned population
growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension
of roads or other
infrastructure)?
No Not
Analyzed No No No
b) Displace substantial
numbers of existing people
or housing, necessitating
the construction of
replacement housing
elsewhere?
No Not
Analyzed No No No

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Induce Population Growth. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to the inducement of substantial unplanned population growth in the area . However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about land use policy impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to physical division of an established community was readily available to the public.

The proposed Project is within the scope of the Menifee North Specific Plan and would result in slightly less development potential than was analyzed in EIR No. 329. In addition, the proposed Project would remain consistent with land use designations and population projections used to prepare the 20 22 AQMP. The proposed Project is part of a development trend that is needed to meet the continuing demand for housing in the Menifee area and Riverside County. The proposed Project would be consistent with the development anticipated under the Specific Plan and the potential impact would be considered less than significant.

(b) Displace Housing. EIR No. 329 did not analyze impacts related to the displacement of substantial numbers of existing people or housing because the Specific Plan area did not contain any housing or development at the time. However, although EIR No. 329 did not address this subject, EIR No. 329 contained enough information about land use policy impacts associated with the Menifee North Specific Plan that with the exercise of reasonable diligence, information about the Menifee North Specific Plan’s potential effects related to physical di vision of an established community was readily available to the public.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 141

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
494 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 79
City of Menifee
The proposed Project parcels do not contain any existing residential housing. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not displace existing housing, nor would it necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. No impact would occur.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 did not analyze potential cumulative population and housing impacts. EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan is located within an area undergoing rapid urbanization as a result of demand pressures for housing, as was occurring in most of Riverside County, and that a number of other major projects were pending in the area at the time of certification. EIR No. 329 also noted that including the Menifee North Specific Plan, the other major developments in the area cumulat ively proposed approximately 32,500 dwelling units, generating an estimated population of 84,175 persons.

In addition to the residential elements of these projects, EIR No. 329 found that these projects included an estimated total of 850 acres of Town Center, Commercial, Business Park and/or Industrial use. EIR No. 329 found that the 2,654 units proposed by the Menifee North Specific Plan constitute 8.2% of the total dwelling units proposed and approved in the City. While individual projects may contribute marginally to growth in the area, EIR No. 329 determined that the collective projects could cumulatively create an overall change in the once rural and sparsely populated nature of the Sun City/Menifee Valley and Romoland/Homeland region. EIR No. 329 also determined that the overall increase in units and related demands along neighborhood roads and for local services and utilities would cumulatively impact the area. In addition, the development of these projects in what was once a semi -rural/ agricultural but steadily developing area could result in conversion of adjoining lands to similar uses, particularly agricultural and open space uses remaining in the area. Therefore, EIR No. 329 found that ultimate urbanization of the Planning Area could potentially indirectly influence expansion throughout the area. However, EIR No. 329 determined that cumulative projects constructed within the Specific Plan area and conforming to County General Plan and zoning designations would have impacts anticipated by the General Plan EIR , and would not create adverse cumulative impacts related to population and housing.

The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project parcels with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in the area or displace any persons. Therefore, the cumulative population and housing impact from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Conclusion

The Project would result in direct population growth in the area . However, the amount of population growth that would result from the proposed Project would be slightly less than what was analyzed in EIR No. 329. Moreover, the Project is not expected to result in the displacement of any existing City residents (population) or housing by its development. Therefore, potential impacts are considered to be less than significant. The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 142

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
495 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
80 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023

4.16 – Public Services
Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Fire protection? Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
b) Police protection? Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No
c) Schools? Yes
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
No No No
d) Parks? Yes
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
No No No
e) Other public facilities? Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Fire protection. EIR No. 329 noted that the Riverside County Fire Department, in cooperation with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection provided fire protection services to the Planning Area and all of Riverside County. It was also noted that there was an existing station serving the Planning Area located at 25730 Sultanas Road. EIR No. 329 found that this station was staffed with two full time (24 hours a day) fire fighters augmented by a volunteer company, and equipped with a standard 1000 GPM pumper. Additionally, it was found that a complete fire station complex located north of Newport Road and west of Lindenberger Road was proposed for construction, would be staffed with two 24-hour firefighters augmented by a volunteer company, and would also be equipped with one 1000 GPM pumper and one 125 ft. ladder truck. It was also noted that according to response time, travel distance and staffing/workload levels established in the Riverside County Fire Protection and Emergency Plan, that the Specific Plan was within an acceptable response distance/travel time from this planned fire station. Finally, EIR No. 329 noted that according to Michael E. Gray, Deputy Fire Marshal, adequate fire protection could be provided to the Planning Area by the existing fire station, and the fire complex proposed north of Newport Road could act as a back -up station once it was Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 143

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
496 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 81
City of Menifee
constructed. As such, no fire protection measures beyond those specified in the Uniform Building Code were incorporated into EIR No. 329 and impacts related to fire protection services were determined to be less than significant.

The City of Menifee continues to contract with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) for fire protection and emergency medical response services. RCFD Station No. 76, located at 29950 Menifee Road, is located approximately 4 miles south of the Project parcels . This station would serve the Project parcels.

Development of the Project would impact fire protection services by placing an additional demand on existing Riverside County Fire Department resources should its resources not be augmented. To offset the increased demand for fire protection services, the Project would be conditioned by the City to provide a minimum of fire safety and support fire suppression activities, including compliance with State and local fire codes, fire sprinklers, a fire hydrant system, paved access, and secondary access routes.

Furthermore, the Project would be required to comply with the provisions of the City’s Development Impact Fee Ordinance, which requires a fee payment to assist the City in providing for fire protection facilities. Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides fair share funds for the provision of additional fire protection facilities. The proposed Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives, and this potential impact would be considered less than significant.

(b) Police protection. EIR No. 329 noted that Police protection in the Planning Area was provided by the Riverside County Sheriff Department at the time the EIR was written . It was also noted that t he station that served the Planning Area was located approximately 11 miles away at 117 S. Langstaff, in the city of Lake Elsinore. EIR No. 329 found that this station was operating with a total of 65 sworn officers, response time to the Planning Area was approximately 10 minutes. EIR No. 329 found that the department used population and development information to calculate future population projections with law enforcement needs so that the Department could remain current with County growth, and that future personnel and equipment needs would be met through fund allocation by the County Board of Supervisors in its yearly budget. Finally, EIR No. 329 noted that developers would be required to cooperate with the Sheriff’s Department to assure proper protection, facilities, and personnel would be available. Developers would also be required to incorporate certain design concepts within the Planning Area in accordance with the Land Use Development Standards of the Specific Plan . With these measures in place EIR No. 329 determined that impacts to police services would be less than significant.

The Menifee Police Department currently provides police protection services to the Specific Plan area.

The proposed Project is within the scope of the Menifee North Specific Plan and would result in slightly less development capacity than was analyzed in EIR No. 329. The Menifee Police Department is located at 29714 Haun Road, approximately 4.5 miles from the Project parcels. The Project would be required to comply with the provisions of the City’s Development Impact Fee Ordinance, which requires a fee payment to assist the City in providing for police protection facilities. Payment of the Development Impact Fee would ensure that the Project provides fair share funds for the provision of additional police protection facilities, if necessary. The proposed Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered police facilities in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives. Therefore, potential impacts to police protection services from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

(c) Schools. As described in EIR No. 329, the Romoland School District indicated that the District would require additional school sites within the Specific Plan area, and the Perris Union High School District indicated that the District would soon be overcrowded and would have to re-evaluate temporary as well Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 144

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
497 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
82 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
as permanent solutions to the growth problem. EIR No. 329 noted that the Specific Plan was being planned in conformance with Land Use Standards, in that the applicant was working with the Romoland and Perris Union High School Districts to mitigate the student impact from the Specific Plan. It was also noted that the Specific Plan included 26.7 acres of designated school sites to serve the Romoland and Perris Union High School Districts. Finally, mitigation measures were incorporated requiring agreements with the school districts and payment of fees to reduce potential impacts. Therefore, with mitigation incorporated it was determined that impacts to schools would be less than significant.

The proposed Project is currently located within the Romoland School District and the Perris Union High School District. The proposed Project is within the scope of the Menifee North Specific Plan and would result in slightly less development potential than was analyzed in EIR No. 329. The proposed Project would be required to comply with the provisions of the School Districts’ development mitigation fee schedule, which requires a fee payment to assist the Districts in providing for school facilities. Payment of these fees would ensure that the Project provides fair share funds for the provision of additional school facilities. As such, the proposed Project would be required to adhere to the requirements of mitigation measures MM-D.5.1 and MM-D.5.2. Therefore, with incorporation of mitigation measure s MM-D.5.1 and MM-D.5.2, the Project would not result in the need for new or physically altered school facilities and this potential impact would be considered less than significant.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-D.5.1 The project applicant shall enter into a binding agreement with both involved school districts to insure the provision of adequate facilities at the time of project occupancy.

MM-D.5.2 The applicant shall be required to pay school impact mitigation fees or fund school site acquisition and/or facility construction with proceeds from the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District. Co mmunity Facilities District (CFD) 91 -1 has been formed which covers the entire Romoland School District. The CFD Report specifies the amounts of school fees to be paid, provides methods of tax apportionment and establishes the maximum amount of bonds to be sold. The project applicants has agreed to comply with the terms of the Resolution of Formation of the CFD.

(d) Parks. EIR No. 329 noted that development of the Menifee North Specific Plan would increase the County population by approximately 6,874 people (2.59 persons per dwelling unit) , in turn increasing the demand for park and recreational facilities. In order to compensate for this increased demand on park and recreational facilities, EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan proposed the inclusion of four neighborhood parks totaling 30.3 acres, 112 acres of natural undisturbed open space, and a ten-foot wide regional hiking/riding trail. It was also noted that the County had adopted provisions within Ordinance No. 460 implementing the Quimby Act, including the Act’s standard of providing three acres of parkland for every 1,000 persons. EIR No. 329 found that the 2,654 residential units proposed by the Menifee No rth Specific Plan would generate an estimated population of 6,874 persons, based on the County's factor of 2.59 persons per dwelling unit. In order to meet Quimby Act standards of three acres of park for each 1,000 persons , EIR No. 329 found that 20.6 acres of neighborhood and community parks would be required. However, EIR No. 329 noted that the 30.3 acres of actual developed parkland proposed in the Specific Plan would satisfy Quimby Act standards as well as satisfying th e Valley -wide Recreation and Park District, which also utilized the 3 -acre per 1,000 population standard. Additionally, EIR No. 329 found there could be some impact on both the Lake Elsinore and Lake Perris State Recreational Areas, due to the close proxim ity of the SRA's to the Specific Plan area, and because with the rapid growth in the region, overcrowding had become a concern along with the requirement of more frequent maintenance. EIR No. 329 determined that these impacts could not be fully mitigated b y park and recreation development within the Menifee North Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 145

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
498 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 83
City of Menifee
Specific Plan as the recreation opportunities at SRA's differs from those commonly provided by neighborhood parks. As such , it was noted that the Specific Plan included an extensive recreational program, that it was anticipated that these facilities could adequately mitigate impacts associated with the increased recreational demand generated by the future residents of Menifee North, and that mitigation measures were incorporated requiring land dedication and/or the payment of in-lieu fees for park and recreation facilities. Therefore, with incorporation of mitigation EIR No. 329 determined that impacts to parks and recreation facilities would be less than significant.

The proposed Project is within the scope of the Menifee North Specific Plan and would result in slightly less development than was analyzed in EIR No. 329. Demand for park and recreational facilities are generally the direct result of residential development. The proposed Project would result in the potential for more households with children and adults who want to use parks and recreation facilities.

Development of the Project, therefore, would have the potential to increase use of local park facilities.

However, all new development, including the proposed Project, would be subject to pay ment of development impact fees to cover its fair share of the cost for facility expansion and maintenance. As such, the proposed Project would be required to adhere to the requirements of mitigation measures MM-D.6.1 and MM -D.6.2. Therefore, with incorporation of mitigation measure s MM-D.6.1 and MM - D.6.2, impacts related to deterioration of parks and recreation facilities would be less than significant.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-D.6.1 The project applicant shall satisfy the Quimby Act and the Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District park requirements which include land dedication and/or the payment of in- lieu fees.

MM-D.6.2 A Master Homeowner's Association, County Service Area, or the Valley-wide Recreation and Park District will maintain the Neighborhood and Community Parks, Open Space and the Drainage Channel.

(e) Other public facilities. EIR No. 329 noted that Public Library facilities serving the Planning Area were provided by the City and County of Riverside and were located at 28081 Bradley Road. It was also noted that implementation of the Menifee North Specific Plan would increase the area’s population and the demand for library services. However, it was found th at adequate library service could be guaranteed through the collection of taxes by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, payable at the time of building permit issuance. Therefore, EIR No. 329 determined that the payment of fees would reduce impacts to less than significant.

The Specific Plan area is currently served by the Menifee Library, which is located at 28798 La Piedra Road in the City of Menifee . The proposed Project would result in an increase in residents that would generate additional demand for public facilities such as libraries. However, all new development, including the proposed Project, would be subject to pay development impact fees to cover its fair share of the cost of facility expansion. Therefore, impacts related to expansion of library facilities would be less than significant with payment of development fees.

Cumulative Impacts

EIR No. 329 noted that Increased development in the Planning Area would incrementally increase the demand for public utilities and services, including police and fire protection , school and park facilities, and other public facilities such as libraries . This increased demand may be viewed as a growth- inducement to existing systems, which may result in expansion or extension of existing service facilities to serve all anticipated projects. However, EIR No. 329 determined that cumulative projects constructed Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 146

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
499 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
84 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
within the Specific Plan area and conforming to County General Plan and zoning designations would have impacts anticipated by the General Plan EIR , and would not create adverse cumulative impacts to public services.

The proposed Project is located in a rapidly urbanizing area and is designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for urban development. Cumulative impacts related to development of the Project parcels with residential uses in conjunction with other development projects in the area were analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the City of Menifee 2013 General Plan and were determined to be less than significant. The proposed Project would be required to pay development fees to contribute to expansion and maintenance of public services facilities . Therefore, the cumulative public services impact from the proposed Project would be less than significant.

Conclusion

The Project would increase the need for fire and police services, but not to the extent that new facilities would be required. The Project applicant would be required to pay all applicable development impact fees to reduce impacts to schools and parks. With payment of fees potential impacts are considered to be less than significant. The Project would be within the scope of what is permitted by the Menifee North Specific Plan and what was evaluated in EIR No. 329 and would not produce new or substantially more severe environmental impacts. As such, no subsequent environmental analysis and no new mitigation are required.

Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 147

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
500 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 85
City of Menifee

4.18 – Recreation
Would the Project:

Effect
Examined
in EIR No.
329?

Conclusion
in EIR No.
329?
Proposed
Changes
Involving New
or More
Severe
Impacts?

New
Circumstances
Involving New
or More Severe
Impacts?
New
Information
Showing
New or More
Severe
Impacts?
a) Would the Project
increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational
facilities such that
substantial physical
deterioration of the facility
would occur or be
accelerated?
Yes
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
No No No
b) Does the Project include
recreational facilities or
require the construction or
expansion of recreational
facilities which might have
an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
Yes
Less than
Significant
Impact
No No No

Proposed Project In Relation to EIR No. 329

(a) Increased Park Use. EIR No. 329 noted that development of the Menifee North Specific Plan would increase the County population by approximately 6,874 people (2.59 persons per dwelling unit), in turn increasing the demand for park and recreational facilities. In order to compensate for this increased demand on park and recreational facilities , EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan proposed the inclusion of four neighborhood parks totaling 30.3 acres, 112 acres of natural undisturbed open space, and a ten -foot w ide regional hiking/riding trail. It was also noted that the County had adopted provisions within Ordinance No. 460 implementing the Quimby Act, including the Act’s standard of providing three acres of parkland for every 1,000 persons. EIR No. 329 found th at the 2,654 residential units proposed by the Menifee North Specific Plan would generate an estimated population of 6,874 persons, based on the County's factor of 2.59 persons per dwelling unit. In order to meet Quimby Act standards of three acres of park for each 1,000 persons, EIR No. 329 found that 20.6 acres of neighborhood and community parks would be required. However, EIR No. 329 noted that the 30.3 acres of actual developed parkland proposed in the Specific Plan would satisfy Quimby Act standards as well as satisfying the Valley -wide Recreation and Park District , which also utilized the 3-acre per 1,000 population standard. Additionally, EIR No. 329 found there could be some impact on both the Lake Elsinore and Lake Perris State Recreational Areas, due to the close proximity of the SRA's to the Specific Plan area, and b ecause with the rapid growth in the region, overcrowding had become a concern along with the requirement of more frequent maintenance. EIR No. 329 determined that these impacts could not be fully mitigated by park and recreation development within the Menifee North Specific Plan as the recreation opportunities at SRA's differs from those commonly provided by neighborhood parks. As such, it was noted that the Specific Plan included an extensive recreational program, that it was anticipated that these facilities could adequately mitigate impacts associated with Item Title: 11.1
Menifee North Specific Plan Amendment No. 5, Tentative Tract Map No. 38132, and Tentative Tract Map No. 38133 Item Page Number: 148

Menifee Mayor and City Council
April 17, 2024
Page
501 of 1244

4 – Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
86 Addendum to EIR No. 329
December 18, 2023
the increased recreational demand generated by the future residents of Menifee North, and that mitigation measures were incorporated requiring land dedication and/or the payment of in-lieu fees for park and recreation facilities. Therefore, with incorporation of mitigation EIR No. 329 determined that impacts to parks and recreation facilities would be less than significant.

The proposed Project is within the scope of the Menifee North Specific Plan and would result in slightly less development than was analyzed in EIR No. 329. Demand for park and recreational facilities are generally the direct result of residential development. The proposed Project would result in the potential for more households with children and adults who want to use parks and recreation facilities.

Development of the Project, therefore, would have the potential to increase use of local park facilities.

However, all new development, including the proposed Project, would be subject to payment of development impact fees to cover its fair share of the cost for facility expansion and maintenance. As such, the proposed Project would be required to adhere to the requirements of mitigation measure s MM-D.6.1 and MM -D.6.2. Therefore, with incorporation of mitigation measure s MM-D.6.1 and MM - D.6.2, impacts related to deterioration of parks and recreation facilities would be less than significant.

EIR No. 329 Mitigation Measures

MM-D.6.1 The project applicant shall satisfy the Quimby Act and the Valley -Wide Recreation and Park District park requirements which include land dedication and/or the payment of in- lieu fees.

MM-D.6.2 A Master Homeowner's Association, County Service Area, or the Valley-wide Recreation and Park District will maintain the Neighborhood and Community Parks, Open Space and the Drainage Channel.

(b) Need for New Parks. EIR No. 329 noted that the Menifee North Specific Plan proposed the inclusion of four neighborhood parks totaling 30.3 acres, 112 acres of natural undisturbed open space, and a ten- foot wide regional hiking/riding trail. With these amenities included in the Specific Plan, EIR No. 329 determined that sufficient parks and recreation facilities would be provide and impacts would be less than significant.

The Project includes a small park but does not require the construction or expansion of new or existing recreational facilities. The proposed Project would result in the potential for more households with children and adults who want to use parks and recreation facilities. As previously mentioned, all new development, including the proposed Project, would be subject to payment of development impact fees to cover its fair share of the cost for facility expansion and maintenance. Therefore, there would be no adverse physical effect on the environment caused by expansion or construction of outdoor recreational facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.

← All documents from this meeting