Agenda packet — Menifee City Council, November 6, 2024 (part 5 of 8)

2 3
8 9
conditions of approval. The SIA requires that improvement securities are posted to guarantee the completion of the required onsite and offsite improvements. The SIA requires that public improvements be completed within 12 months from the date of City Council approval.

Staff has reviewed the Developer’s request and determined that the SIA meets the requirements of the Project’s conditions of approval. A summary of the bonds being posted to guarantee the required improvements are shown in the tables below.

TABLE 1 – ONSITE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
Improvement Security Faithful Performance Labor & Materials Streets and Drainage 024278270 $ 549,500 $ 274,750
Water System 024278270 $ 153,000 $ 76,500
Sewer System 024278270 $ 207,000 $ 103,500
Total $ 909,500 $ 454,750
TABLE 2 – MONUMENT IMPROVEMENTS
Improvement Security
Survey Monuments 0809130 $ 50,400
Total $ 50,400
The total securities required for all improvements have been provided by the Developer in the total amount of $959,900.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE
Safe and Vibrant Community

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. The Developer has paid all necessary fees associated with review of TM37408-2. Upon completion of the improvements, and subsequent acceptance by the City, ongoing maintenance costs for the improvements would be supported through future fiscal year budgets in maintenance Community Facilities District 2017- 1 Annexation 12, Zone 12.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Legado Site Map

2. Project Site Map

3. Final Map

4. Agreement

5. Bond – Improvements

6. Bond – Monuments
Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 2

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
674 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 3

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
675 of 1464

1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9
40414243444546474849
39 20
19 18
17 16
15 14
13 12
11 383736353433323130
29 28
27 26 25 24 23 22 21
10 LOT "B"
LOT "D"

ROUSE ROAD

SHERMAN ROAD
{\W0.9;ROCKABILLY ROAD}

TWO CELLOS WAY

COWBELL COURT

BANJO STREET
Drawing: \\\\ka-fs\\LDD_drawings\\338506\\Exhibit\\Site plan\\City Council Site Plans\\506 - EXH - TM 37408-2 - SITE PLAN.dwg Layout: p 8.5x11 P Saved: 10/7/2024 7:48 AM Plotted: 10/7/2024 7:49 AM By: Pedram Yazdani 0 SCALE: 1"=150'
150 300 450
%%UVICINITY MAP

ROADROUSE

MURRIETA ROAD

BRADLEY ROAD

CHAMBERS AVENUE

ENCANTO DRIVE
McCALL BLVD.

McLAUGHLIN

ETHANAC
N.T.S.

ROAD
ROAD

EVANS ROAD

SHERMAN ROAD

ANTELOPE ROAD

PROJECT
SITE

INTERSTATE
215

PROJECT SITE MAP
Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 4

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
676 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 5

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
677 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 6

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
678 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 7

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
679 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 8

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
680 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 9

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
681 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 10

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
682 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 11

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
683 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 12

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
684 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 13

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
685 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 14

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
686 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 15

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
687 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 16

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
688 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 17

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
689 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 18

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
690 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 19

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
691 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 20

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
692 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 21

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
693 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 22

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
694 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 23

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
695 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 24

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
696 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 25

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
697 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 26

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
698 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 27

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
699 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 28

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
700 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 29

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
701 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 30

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
702 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 31

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
703 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 32

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
704 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 33

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
705 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 34

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
706 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 35

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
707 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 36

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
708 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 37

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
709 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 38

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
710 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 39

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
711 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 40

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
712 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 41

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
713 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 42

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
714 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 43

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
715 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 44

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
716 of 1464

Item Title: 10.25
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-2, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 45

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
717 of 1464

CITY OF MENIFEE
SUBJECT: Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC
MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Amanda Backlund, Assistant Engineer
REVIEWED BY: Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY: Armando G. Villa, City Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve and authorize the filing of final map for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC, located south of Rouse Road and north of Chambers Ave; and

2. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute a Subdivision Improvement Agreement to guarantee the completion of required public improvements associated with Tract Map 37408-3.

DISCUSSION
Tract Map 37391, also known as Legado (“Development”), is an approved subdivision that consists of 331 gross acres of land to be subdivided into 18 lots for residential, commercial, and park use, and 28 lots for roads and utilities. TM 37391 was recorded to establish the Development’s planning areas to be further subdivided in the future. The Development is located east of Encanto Drive, south of Rouse Road, west of Antelope Road, and north of Chambers Avenue.

In 2024, Lennar Homes of California, LLC. (“Developer”) purchased the first phase of the Development, entered into improvement agreements with the City for construction of backbone infrastructure, and began preparing four tract maps within Phase 1 (“Project”). Tract Map 37408- 3 (TM37408-3), the third of the four Project maps, is a proposed subdivision of 45.88 gross acres of land into 115 single-family residential lots and a water quality/detention basin. TM37408-3 is located east of the I-215 Freeway, south of Rouse Road, and north of Chambers Avenue. The final filing of maps TM37408-1, -2, and -4 have been provided as separate agenda items for City Council consideration.

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 1

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
718 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
Final Map 37408-3, Legado
November 6, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

2 3
9 0
The Developer is now requesting approval and filing of the final map for TM37408-3 and approval of the associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) as required by the Project’s conditions of approval. The SIA requires that improvement securities are posted to guarantee the completion of the required onsite and offsite improvements. The SIA requires that public improvements be completed within 12 months from the date of City Council approval.

TABLE 1 – ONSITE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
Improvement Security Faithful Performance Labor & Materials Streets and Drainage 1109178 $ 1,802,000 $ 901,000
Water System 1109178 $ 357,500 $ 178,750
Sewer System 1109178 $ 392,500 $ 196,250
Total $ 2,552,000 $ 1,276,000
TABLE 2 – MONUMENT IMPROVEMENTS
Improvement Security
Survey Monuments 0809131 $ 131,400
Total $ 131,400
The total securities required for all improvements have been provided by the Developer in the total amount of $2,683,400.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE
Safe and Vibrant Community

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. The Developer has paid all necessary fees associated with review of TM37408-3. Upon completion of the improvements, and subsequent acceptance by the City, ongoing maintenance costs for the improvements would be supported through future fiscal year budgets in maintenance Community Facilities District 2017- 1 Annexation 12, Zone 12.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Legado Site Map

2. Project Site Map

3. Final Map

4. Agreement

5. Bond – Improvements

6. Bond – Monuments
Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 2

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
719 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 3

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
720 of 1464

1 2
3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
192021222324
25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
3940
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 4849
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 5758
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 6667
68 69
70 71
72 73
74 75
7678
79 80
81 82
83 84
85 86
87 88
89 90
91 92
93 94
95 96
97 98 99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
116 O.S.
117 O.S.
119 O.S.

RECREATIONAL
PARK

WATER QUALITY / DETENTION BASIN
CENTER
115
LOT "E" LOT "B"
LOT "D"
LOT "F"
LOT "G"
LOT "H"

ROUSE ROAD

PENNYWHISTLE WAY

LUTE LANE

ZITHER WAY

KEYBOARD COURT

FIDDLE LANE

TWIST STREET

DUET DRIVE
Drawing: \\\\ka-fs\\LDD_drawings\\338506\\Exhibit\\Site plan\\City Council Site Plans\\506 - EXH - TM 37408-3 - SITE PLAN.dwg Layout: p 8.5x11 P Saved: 10/7/2024 7:51 AM Plotted: 10/7/2024 7:51 AM By: Pedram Yazdani 0 SCALE: 1"=300'
300 600 900
%%UVICINITY MAP

ROADROUSE

MURRIETA ROAD

BRADLEY

CHAMBERS AVENUE

ENCANTO DRIVE
McCALL BLVD.

McLAUGHLIN

ETHANAC
N.T.S.

ROAD
ROAD

EVANS ROAD

SHERMAN ROAD

ANTELOPE ROAD
SITE

INTERSTATE
215

PROJECT
ROAD

PROJECT SITE MAP
Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 4

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
721 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 5

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
722 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 6

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
723 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 7

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
724 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 8

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
725 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 9

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
726 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 10

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
727 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 11

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
728 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 12

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
729 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 13

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
730 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 14

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
731 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 15

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
732 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 16

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
733 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 17

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
734 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 18

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
735 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 19

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
736 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 20

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
737 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 21

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
738 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 22

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
739 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 23

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
740 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 24

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
741 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 25

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
742 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 26

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
743 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 27

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
744 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 28

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
745 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 29

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
746 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 30

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
747 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 31

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
748 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 32

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
749 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 33

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
750 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 34

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
751 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 35

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
752 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 36

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
753 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 37

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
754 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 38

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
755 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 39

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
756 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 40

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
757 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 41

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
758 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 42

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
759 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 43

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
760 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 44

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
761 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 45

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
762 of 1464

Item Title: 10.26
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-3, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 46

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
763 of 1464

CITY OF MENIFEE
SUBJECT: Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC
MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Amanda Backlund, Assistant Engineer
REVIEWED BY: Nick Fidler, Public Works Director
APPROVED BY: Armando G. Villa, City Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve and authorize the filing of final map for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC, located south of Rouse Road and east of Trumble Road; and

2. Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute the Subdivision Improvement Agreement to guarantee the completion of required public improvements associated with Tract Map 37408-4.

In 2024, Lennar Homes of California, LLC. (“Developer”) purchased the first phase of the Development, entered into improvement agreements with the City for construction of backbone infrastructure, and began preparing four tract maps within Phase 1 (“Project”). Tract Map 37408- 4 (TM37408-4), the last of the four Project maps, is a proposed subdivision of 20.39 gross acres of land into 59 single-family residential lots. TM37408-4 is located east of the I-215 Freeway, south of Rouse Road, and east of Trumble Road. The final filing of maps TM37408-1, -2, and -3 have been provided as separate agenda items for City Council consideration.

The Developer is now requesting approval and filing of the final map for TM37408-4 and approval of the associated Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“SIA”) as required by the Project’s Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 1

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
764 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
Final Map 37408-4, Legado
November 6, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

2 4
2 6
conditions of approval. The SIA requires that improvement securities are posted to guarantee the completion of the required onsite and offsite improvements. The SIA requires that public improvements be completed within 12 months from the date of City Council approval.

Staff have reviewed the Developer’s request and determined that the SIA meets the requirements of the Project’s conditions of approval. A summary of the bonds being posted to guarantee the required improvements are shown in Tables 1 and 2 below.

TABLE 1 – ONSITE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
Improvement Security Faithful
Performance Labor & Materials
Streets and Drainage US00139591SU24A $ 879,500 $ 439,750 Water System US00139591SU24A $ 203,500 $ 101,750
Sewer System US00139591SU24A $ 235,000 $ 117,500
Total $ 1,318,000 $ 659,000
TABLE 2 – MONUMENT IMPROVEMENTS
Improvement Security
Survey Monuments 0809132 $ 87,120
Total $ 87,120
The total securities required for all improvements have been provided by the Developer in the total amount of $1,405,120.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE
Safe and Vibrant Community

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. The Developer has paid all necessary fees associated with review of TM37408-4. Upon completion of the improvements, and subsequent acceptance by the City, ongoing maintenance costs for the improvements would be supported through future fiscal year budgets in maintenance Community Facilities District 2017- 1 Annexation 12, Zone 12.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Legado Site Map

2. Project Site Map

3. Final Map

4. Agreement

5. Bond – Improvements

6. Bond – Monuments
Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 2

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
765 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 3

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
766 of 1464

2 1
3 4 5 6 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
1718
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 27
26 28
29 30
31 32
3334
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
5049484746454443
59 58 57 56 55 54 53
51 52
LOT "E"
LOT "F"
{\W0.9;PASEO LEGADO}
{\W0.9;REMIX ROAD}
{\W0.9;SHERMAN ROAD}
{\W0.9;DIDGERIDO DRIVE}
{\W0.9;BANJO STREET}
Drawing: \\\\ka-fs\\LDD_drawings\\338506\\Exhibit\\Site plan\\City Council Site Plans\\506 - EXH - TM 37408-4 - SITE PLAN.dwg Layout: p 8.5x11 P Saved: 10/7/2024 7:32 AM Plotted: 10/7/2024 7:52 AM By: Pedram Yazdani 0 SCALE: 1"=200'
200 400 600
%%UVICINITY MAP

ROADROUSE

MURRIETA ROAD

BRADLEY

CHAMBERS AVENUE

ENCANTO DRIVE
McCALL BLVD.

McLAUGHLIN

ETHANAC
N.T.S.

ROAD
ROAD

EVANS ROAD

SHERMAN ROAD

ANTELOPE ROAD

INTERSTATE
215ROAD

PROJECT
SITE

PROJECT SITE MAP
Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 4

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
767 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 5

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
768 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 6

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
769 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 7

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
770 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 8

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
771 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 9

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
772 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 10

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
773 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 11

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
774 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 12

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
775 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 13

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
776 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 14

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
777 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 15

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
778 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 16

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
779 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 17

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
780 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 18

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
781 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 19

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
782 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 20

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
783 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 21

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
784 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 22

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
785 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 23

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
786 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 24

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
787 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 25

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
788 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 26

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
789 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 27

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
790 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 28

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
791 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 29

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
792 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 30

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
793 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 31

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
794 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 32

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
795 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 33

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
796 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 34

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
797 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 35

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
798 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 36

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
799 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 37

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
800 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 38

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
801 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 39

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
802 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 40

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
803 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 41

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
804 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 42

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
805 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 43

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
806 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 44

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
807 of 1464

Item Title: 10.27
Final Map, Agreement, and Bonds for Tract Map 37408-4, Legado, by Lennar Homes of California, LLC Item Page Number: 45

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
808 of 1464

CITY OF MENIFEE
SUBJECT: Notice of Completion and Acceptance for Gale Webb, Kids-R- #1 Action Sports Park
MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Nancy Rodriguez, Management Analyst
REVIEWED BY: Rebekah Kramer, Deputy City Manager
APPROVED BY: Armando G. Villa, City Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Accept the improvements for Capital Improvement Program (CIP) No. 17-01, Gale Web, Kids- R-#1 Action Sports Park located at 26533 Craig Avenue; and

2. Authorize the City Clerk’s office to file the Notice of Completion with the Riverside County Recorder’s Office.

DISCUSSION
The Evans Park Pump Track and Bike Trail, now named the Gale Webb, Kids-R-#1, Action Sports Park is located on a six-acre lot on the southeastern corner of Evans Road and Craig Avenue.

The construction of the pump track was completed October 2022, however, the second phase consisted of the street expansion portion. This included the construction and installation of various improvements along the southern section of the pump track on Craig Avenue including curb, gutter, driveway approach, an expansion of the roadway, and a new water line.

On September 21, 2022, City Council approved an agreement to Roadway Engineering and Construction Corporation for the pump track street expansion portion of the project with a construction budget of $466,042. The contract included the construction and installation of various improvements along the southern section of the pump track on Craig Avenue including curb, gutter, driveway approach, and expansion of the roadway. One change order totaling $8,820 was necessary. The change order was due to a delay in approval of the contractor insurance by Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). The final construction cost for the project was $474,862.

Filing a Notice of Completion (NOC) protects the city from future claims against the project by providing proper notification to each contractor, subcontractor, and material supplier that the Item Title: 10.28
Notice of Completion and Acceptance for Gale Webb, Kids-R-#1 Action Sports Park Item Page Number: 1

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
809 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
CIP No. 17-01 NOC
November 6, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

2 3
9 2
project has been completed. The payment bond (Labor and Materials Bond) and performance bond would be released 30 days following the date of the NOC recording, provided no stop notices are filed preventing said releases.

Community Services staff has inspected the materials supplied, quality of the materials, construction methods, and workmanship, and have determined the construction and related work performed by the contractor, Roadway Engineering & Construction Corp, have met the project requirements as specified in the contract documents.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE
Safe and Vibrant Community

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Notice of Completion

2. Contract Change Order Summary
Item Title: 10.28
Notice of Completion and Acceptance for Gale Webb, Kids-R-#1 Action Sports Park Item Page Number: 2

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
810 of 1464

Recording Requested By:

CITY OF MENIFEE

After Recording Mail To:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF MENIFEE
29844 HAUN ROAD
MENIFEE, CA 92586

Record without fee subject to Govt. Code 6103

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(Public Works – Civil Code Sec. 9204)

Evans Park Design and Construction, CIP No. 17-01

Notice is hereby given that:

Work of improvements on the project herein described was accepted as complete on May 31, 2024. The project consisted of a street expansion with a waterline tie in . The project was completed at Gale Webb Action Sports Park located at 26533 Craig Avenue in the City of Menifee, County of Riverside, State of California.

1. The full name of the Owner is: CITY OF MENIFEE

2. The full address of the Owner is: 29844 HAUN ROAD
MENIFEE, CA. 92586

3. The undersigned is a Corporate Officer of the Owner of the interest stated below in the property herein described:

PUBLIC PARK IN
MENIFEE, CA 92584

4. The name of the contractor for such work of construction is:

Roadway Engineering & Construction Corp.
3121 Indian Avenue
Perris, CA 92571

5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is within the City of Menifee, County of Riverside, State of California.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
Ss

COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
I, Stephanie Roseen, hereby certify that I am the Acting City Clerk of the City of Menifee, a municipal corporation, which is the owner of the properties described within this Notice of Completi on, executed on behalf of the City ; that I have read the notice and know the contents thereof and that the facts therein stated are true of my own knowledge under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California; that I make this verification on _________________, 20___ for and on behalf of the City.

_____________________________
Stephanie Roseen, Acting City Clerk
Item Title: 10.28
Notice of Completion and Acceptance for Gale Webb, Kids-R-#1 Action Sports Park Item Page Number: 3

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
811 of 1464

Contract Change Order Summary – Roadway Engineering and Construction Corporation
Evans Park Design and Construction
(CIP No. 17-01)

Contract Change
Order No. Description
Date
Approved
Additional
Time Amount Percent
001 R&R AC and Sidewalk Repair 12/4/23 5 days $8,820 1.89% Totals 5 days $8,820 1.89%

Original Contract Amount: $466,042.00
Total Change Order Amount: $8,820.00
Revised Contract Amount: $474,862.00

Item Title: 10.28
Notice of Completion and Acceptance for Gale Webb, Kids-R-#1 Action Sports Park Item Page Number: 4

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
812 of 1464

CITY OF MENIFEE
SUBJECT: Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project
MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Ryan Fowler, Principal Planner
REVIEWED BY: Cheryl Kitzerow, Community Development Director APPROVED BY: Armando G. Villa, City Manager
APPELLANTS: Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance and City of Perris
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Uphold the Planning Commission’s certification of an Environmental Impact Report and approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and Plot Plan No. PLN21-0370 for CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project, located west of Interstate 215 and south of Ethanac Road; and

2. Adopt a resolution denying Appeal No. PLN24-0169 submitted by The Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance; and

3. Adopt a resolution denying Appeal No. PLN24-0182 submitted by the City of Perris.

DISCUSSION
Background
On August 14, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted 3- 1-1 (Commissioner Long voting no and Chair LaDue absent) to approve Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and Plot Plan (PP) No. PLN21-0370 – CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project along with the related environmental analysis. On August 20, 2024, the City received an application from the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance to appeal the Planning Commission decision. On August 23, 2024, the City received a second application from the City of Perris to appeal the Planning Commission decision. For more information on the project, the August 14, 2024 Planning Commission staff report is attached.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 1

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
813 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
Appeals of CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project
November 6, 2024

Page 2 of 7 ends

2 3
4 1
TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) was approved by the Planning Commission for the consolidation of eight parcels into one industrial parcel. The Project site is approximately 40.03 gross acres and

36.81 net acres.

PP No. PLN21-0370 was approved by the Planning Commission for construction and operation of a 700,037 square-foot warehouse/industrial building with 10,000 square feet of office space and 690,037 square feet of warehouse space on a 36.8-net acre (40.03 gross acre) site. There would be three points of access on Byers Road and two points of access on Wheat Street.

Associated facilities and improvements of the Project include on-site landscaping, parking, regional Project access, and off-site improvements (roadway improvements, storm drain, utilities).

The Project is generally located west of Interstate 215 (I-215) and south of Ethanac Road, within the City of Menifee (City), County of Riverside, State of California. The Project is north of Corsica Lane, south of Kuffel Road, east of Wheat Street, and west of Byers Road. The Project site is located in the Economic Development Corridor-Northern Gateway (EDC-NG) zone of the City and is currently bordered by a scattering of existing rural residential properties (1-5 acres) and vacant land. The Project site consists of eight parcels (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 330-190-002 through -005 and 330-190-010 through -013).

Project Location
Wheat St.

Byers St.

Ethanac Rd.

Kuffel Rd.

Corsica Ln.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 2

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
814 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
Appeals of CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project
November 6, 2024

Page 3 of 7 ends

2 3
4 1
Appeal No. PLN24-0182
The City of Perris filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s August 14, 2024 approval of TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN21-0370, claiming areas of the Project (as outlined below), including the environmental analysis, were not adequately analyzed/addressed. The appeal letter raises concerns with the following:

1. Incomplete Project Description

2. Insufficient Analysis of Transportation Impacts

3. Insufficient Analysis of Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions

4. Insufficient Analysis of Air Quality Impacts

5. Insufficient Analysis of Noise Impacts

6. Inadequate Project Alternatives Analysis
In response to the City of Perris appeal letter, staff, in conjunction with the City’s California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Consultant, has prepared detailed responses to each topic as an attachment to this report. A summary of the appellant’s concerns are provided below:

1. Incomplete Project Description
The appeal letter asserts there are multiple aspects of the Project, particularly offsite improvements, which were not presented in the Project Description of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and therefore the potential impacts of those aspects were not evaluated.

However, the City of Perris does not provide sufficient evidence that supports how the Final EIR failed to address their concerns or why the EIR is an inadequate environmental document pursuant to CEQA as it relates to an incomplete Project Description.

A Project Description should not supply extensive detail beyond that needed for evaluation and review of the environmental impact. Because the off-site improvements associated with the proposed Project do not involve significant construction that would impact any of the analyses or conclusions in the EIR, mention of off-site improvements is not required to be included in the Project Description. The off-site improvements associated with the proposed Project are not considered intensive construction work that would expand the scope of project construction impacts already discussed thoroughly in the Draft EIR.

2. Insufficient Analysis of Transportation Impacts.

The appeal letter raises concerns regarding the environmental impact analysis performed for the Project regarding traffic impacts, specifically related to geometric hazards, the preparation of a global traffic study, existing traffic volumes, Project trip generation rates, particular intersection operations, and the improvement requirements for direct impacts.

Regarding geometric hazards and intersection operations, the intersection of Barnett Road/Case Road at Ethanac Road operates as one intersection and it was determined that it should be analyzed as one for analysis purposes. The Project does not take direct access from Barnett Road and would add eastbound and westbound through traffic on Ethanac Road at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Barnett Road/Case Road. Therefore, the Project would not directly impact the turn pockets at the intersection, as is stated, and would not create hazards due to geometric design features. In addition, contrary to Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 3

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
815 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
Appeals of CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project
November 6, 2024

Page 4 of 7 ends

2 3
4 1
comments in the appeal letter, no improvements are necessary of the Project at this intersection and the Project would not create hazards due to geometric design features.

For the comment related to a global traffic study, Ethanac Road is currently a truck route and the potential for a truck corridor south of Ethanac Road is uncertain. Therefore, the Project Traffic Study analyzed a worst-case scenario based on the potential use and the items known certain at the time of the preparation of the Project Traffic Study.

In regard to the existing traffic volumes, traffic counts in the Project Traffic Study were determined to be reasonable, as well as conservative in some locations as noted and described in more detail in the attached responses.

In addition, the appeal letter argues the trip generation rates that were used are outdated.

Staff disagrees with this assessment as the rates used are widely accepted and used by many cities in the Inland Empire. In addition, basing the trip estimates on the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) methodology (inclusive of ITE 11th Edition for the passenger car/truck splits), as is suggested, would not change the significance determinations in the Draft EIR and would not require new or modified mitigation measures.

3. Insufficient Analysis of GHG Emissions.

The appeal letter cites concerns related to what it describes as unassessed and unevaluated improvements, particularly the offsite improvements not contained in the Project Description of the EIR, and outdated modeling of GHG emissions.

Refer to Subpoint 1 above regarding City of Perris’ argument that the off-site improvements were absent from the Project Description of the EIR and that the GHG analysis was flawed.

The appeal also notes the GHG Emissions Assessment used CalEEMod version 2020.4 and acknowledges SCAQMD recommended all air quality analyses conducted after December 21, 2022 use the latest version of CalEEMod. Consistent with SCAQMD’s recommendations, the air quality and GHG modeling for the Project was initially completed in August 2022 with additional modeling completed in October 2022 to incorporate mitigation required by the Health Risk Assessment (HRA). Therefore, all modeling for the Project was completed before CalEEMod 2022 was approved for full release. As a result, CalEEMod version 2020.4 was the latest available software at the time the analysis was conducted.

The appeal letter also states that the installation, maintenance and regular testing of one or more emergency fire water pumps was not assessed. This comment is incorrect, as these emissions are addressed by the backup generator emissions evaluated in the Draft EIR. Further details are provided in the attached detailed responses.

4. Insufficient Analysis of Air Quality Impacts.

The appeal letter cites concerns related to what it describes as unevaluated improvements and mitigation lacking adequate performance standards. Specifically, the letter references Mitigation Measure (MM) AQ-3.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 4

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
816 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
Appeals of CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project
November 6, 2024

Page 5 of 7 ends

2 3
4 1
Again, refer to Subpoint 1 above regarding City of Perris’ argument that the off-site improvements were absent from the Project Description of the EIR and that the air quality analysis was flawed.

Regarding the City of Perris’ argument that the MM AQ-3 lacks adequate performance standards, MM AQ-3 requires the Project operator to submit a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program to the City. The TMD program which would provide employees with information regarding the use of public transportation, carpooling/vanpooling, and walking or biking to work, rather than driving to work every day. The development and submission of this TDM is the performance standard for this mitigation measure and will help to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). In addition, although not acknowledged by the commenter, MM AQ-4, which requires all cargo handling equipment to be zero emissions, is the main source of air quality pollutant emission reduction. Implementation of these mitigation measures will reduce the air quality impacts to a less than significant level.

5. Insufficient Analysis of Noise Impacts.

The appeal letter cites concerns related to what it describes as incorrect thresholds and methodology related to noise impacts.

The commenter seems to suggest that a cumulative noise analysis was not prepared for the Project; however, cumulative noise impacts are discussed on pages 4.11-25 through

4.11-27 of the Draft EIR. The comment incorrectly states the Draft EIR does not identify a significant impact. However, as detailed in the attached responses, the Draft EIR identified the cumulative noise impact. However, the Draft EIR determines this impact would not be cumulatively considerable.

6. Inadequate Project Alternatives Analysis.

The appeal letter states the City failed to analyze a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives.

As stated in Final EIR Response to Comment, CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 requires a project provide a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project. Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision making and public participation. The City deemed that having two alternatives for the Project provides an adequate range of alternatives pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, because those were the alternatives determined which could reduce the Project’s significant effects while still meeting most of the basic Project objectives.

Appeal No. PLN24-0169
The Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA) filed an appeal of the Planning Commission’s August 14, 2024 approval of TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN 21- 0370, claiming the Planning Commission erred in its decision to approve the Project by Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 5

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
817 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
Appeals of CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project
November 6, 2024

Page 6 of 7 ends

2 3
4 1
determining the Project would not result in further impacts on an already pollution-burdened citizenry. GSEJA provided information depicting the severity of the level of pollution and health hazards the City of Menifee and its citizens are experiencing. The appeal letter reaffirms its concerns that were presented in its original letter dated April 26, 2024 (and again on August 11, 2024), which were responded to by staff, in conjunction with our CEQA Consultant, in the Final EIR.

The commenter provides a table of data which gives the false impression that the area surrounding the Project site is disproportionately impacted. However, the proposed Project would not result in significant and unavoidable air quality impacts. Localized air quality impacts would be less than significant and there are no significant air quality impacts to local residents as a result of approval of the proposed Project.

The original April 26, 2024 comment letter on the Draft EIR contained concerns from GSEJA regarding air quality, GHG emissions, land use and planning, transportation and traffic, growth inducing impacts, alternatives, and population and housing. In the appeal letter, GSEJA does not specifically argue with the adequacy of any of those City responses contained in the Final EIR.

As such, the previous responses to these resource topics are still appropriate, and no additional points were raised in the appeal letter which would require further analysis.

Environmental Determination
The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC24-639 certifying an EIR on August 14, 2024 determining the Project will have a significant effect on the environment (related to GHG Emission). However, an EIR was prepared for this Project pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA.

Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the Project and a Mitigation Reporting or Monitoring Plan was adopted for this Project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this Project and findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. Following the Project’s approval, a Notice of Determination (NOD) was filed with the Riverside County Clerk’s Office on August 16, 2024.

The Final EIR, as well as all its technical appendices, can be accessed for review on the City website: https://www.cityofmenifee.us/325/Environmental-Notices-Documents.

Public Notice
Public notices were distributed on October 27, 2024 for the November 6, 2024 City Council hearing. Notices were published in The Press Enterprise and notices were sent to owners within 300 feet of the Project site boundaries and to all relevant agencies, interested parties, and all who commented on the environmental document. On-site postings were provided.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVE
Thriving Economy

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 6

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
818 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
Appeals of CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project
November 6, 2024

Page 7 of 7 ends

2 3
4 1

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution – City of Perris

2. Appeal Letter (Bracketed) – City of Perris

3. City Response to Appeal Letter – City of Perris

4. Resolution – GSEJA

5. Appeal Letter (Bracketed) – GSEJA

6. City Response to Appeal Letter - GSEJA

7. Amended COAs – Adopted by Planning Commission

8. August 14, 2024 Planning Commission Staff Report

9. Public Hearing Notice
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 7

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
819 of 1464

RESOLUTION NO. 24-______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA DENYING APPEAL NO. PLN24-0182 OF THE CADO

MENIFEE INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE PROJECT (TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. PLN22-0041 AND PLOT PLAN NO. PLN21-0370) WHEREAS, on November 15, 2021, the applicant, CADO Menifee, LLC (“Applicant”), filed a formal application with the City of Menifee for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) to consolidate eight parcels into one industrial parcel for a total of approximately 40.03 gross acres and 36.81 net acres, and Plot Plan (PP) No. PLN21-0370 for the construction of a 700,037 square-foot warehouse/industrial building with 10,000 square feet of office space and 690,037 square feet of warehouse space on the same 40.03 gross acre site (the “Project”). The Project site is generally located north of Corsica Lane, south of Kuffel Road, east of Wheat Street, and west of Byers Road within the City of Menifee (City), County of Riverside, State of California (APNs: 330-190-002 through -005 and 330-190-010 through -013); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared to analyze and mitigate the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2024, at a legally noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 3-1-1 to certify the EIR and approve TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN21-0370 for the Project; and
WHEREAS, on August 23, 2024, an application to appeal Planning Commission certification of the EIR for the Project and approval of TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN21-0370 was submitted by the City of Perris; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2024, the City Council of the City of Menifee held a public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission’s certification of the EIR and approval of TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN21-0370 and Resolution Nos. PC24-0639 and PC24-0640, considered all public testimony as well as all materials in the staff report and accompanying documents for the appeal, which hearing was publicly noticed by a publication in The Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation, an agenda posting, notice to property owners within 300 feet of the Project boundaries, on-site posting at the Project site, and to persons requesting public notice.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Menifee hereby approves the following:

1. That the City Council finds the facts presented within the public record and within the Resolution provides the basis to deny Appeal No. PLN24-0182 and uphold the Planning Commission certification of the EIR and approval of TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN21-0370 and Resolution Nos. PC24-0639 and PC24-0640.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 8

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
820 of 1464

Appeal of CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project – City of Perris October 2, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

2. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution has been based are located at the Community Development Department – Planning Division, 29844 Haun Road, Menifee, CA 92586. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code section 21081.6.

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 6th day of November 2024. _________________________
Bill Zimmerman, Mayor
Attest:
______________________________
Stephanie Roseen, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:
______________________________
Jeffrey T. Melching, City Attorney
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 9

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
821 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 10

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
822 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 11

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
823 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 12

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
824 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 13

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
825 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 14

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
826 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 15

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
827 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 16

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
828 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 17

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
829 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 18

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
830 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 19

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
831 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 20

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
832 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 21

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
833 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 22

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
834 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 23

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
835 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 24

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
836 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 25

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
837 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 26

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
838 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 27

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
839 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 28

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
840 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 29

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
841 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 30

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
842 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 31

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
843 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 32

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
844 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 33

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
845 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 34

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
846 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 35

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
847 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 36

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
848 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 37

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
849 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 38

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
850 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 39

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
851 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 40

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
852 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 41

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
853 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 42

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
854 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 43

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
855 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 44

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
856 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 45

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
857 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 46

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
858 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 47

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
859 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 48

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
860 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 49

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
861 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 50

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
862 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 51

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
863 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 52

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
864 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 53

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
865 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 54

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
866 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 55

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
867 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 56

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
868 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 57

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
869 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 58

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
870 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 59

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
871 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 60

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
872 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 61

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
873 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 62

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
874 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 63

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
875 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 64

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
876 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 65

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
877 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 66

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
878 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 67

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
879 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 68

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
880 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 69

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
881 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 70

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
882 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 71

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
883 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 72

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
884 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 73

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
885 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 74

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
886 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 75

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
887 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 76

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
888 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 77

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
889 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 78

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
890 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 79

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
891 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 80

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
892 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 81

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
893 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 82

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
894 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 83

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
895 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 84

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
896 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 85

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
897 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 86

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
898 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 87

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
899 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 88

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
900 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 89

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
901 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 90

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
902 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 91

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
903 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 92

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
904 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 93

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
905 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 94

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
906 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 95

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
907 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 96

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
908 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 97

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
909 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 98

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
910 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 99

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
911 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 100

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
912 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 101

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
913 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 102

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
914 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 103

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
915 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 104

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
916 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 105

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
917 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 106

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
918 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 107

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
919 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 108

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
920 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 109

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
921 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 110

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
922 of 1464

City of Menifee
CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project
Perris Appeal Comments and Responses
A-1This comment explains that this letter is the City of Perris’ appeal letter in objection to the City of Menifee Planning Commission’s August 14, 2024 decision approving the Tentative Parcel Map and Plot Plan to permit the construction and operation of the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project (Project) and the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) approved for the Project. This comment does not raise any substantive issues with the Final EIR and therefore no further response is needed. The following responses were prepared to address the substantive comments raised in the rest of the City of Perris’ appeal letter. Please refer to Responses to Comments A-2 through A-64.

A-2This comment summarizes the Project and does not raise any specific comments regarding the Final EIR. No further response is warranted.

A-3This comment is a general description of the Green Valley Specific Plan (GVSP), a master-planned community within the City of Perris. No specific comments concerning the deficiency of the Final EIR were made, and, therefore, no further response is warranted.

A-4The City of Perris notes the residential units within the GVSP and the vicinity of the Project site but makes no specific claims on how the Final EIR did not adequately address impacts to surrounding residences. As addressed in the Final EIR Response to Comments G14, G16 and G18, Ethanac Road is currently a truck route. A global Traffic Study for the Menifee Economic Development Corridor (MEDC) area, including the addition of a truck corridor south of Ethanac Road, is currently being prepared in coordination with the City of Menifee and the City of Perris.

Any improvements to portions of intersections or roadways shared with the City of Perris would be coordinated between the City of Menifee and City of Perris prior to final engineering for the Project.

A-5The City of Perris states that the City of Menifee did not adequately address the City of Perris’ concerns expressed in the Project’s Notice of Preparation (NOP) scoping process, Draft EIR public review period, and following the Final EIR, but does not provide further detailed information why their concerns were not adequately addressed. No further response is warranted. Additionally, the City of Menifee believes all previous responses to Perris’s Draft EIR comment letter were thorough and adequate.

A-6This comment reiterates that the City of Perris’ letter constitutes an appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of the Project but does not raise any specific deficiencies. Please refer to the following Responses to Comments A-7 through A-64 prepared in response to the City of Perris’ comments.

A-7This comment states that the City of Perris provided comments dated April 26 and August 14 on the Draft EIR’s Project Description. This comment is acknowledged, and the City of Menifee responded to all comments on the Draft EIR - see Response to Comments G3 through G7 in the Final EIR that were prepared in response to the City of Perris’ comment on the Project Description Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 111

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
923 of 1464

being inadequate. This comment does not provide any evidence how the Final EIR failed to address their comments or is an inadequate environmental document pursuant to the CEQA.

A-8The Project Traffic Study recommended that the intersection of Wheat Street at Ethanac Road (intersection #9) is anticipated to be right-in-right-out (RIRO) access. With this improvement, the intersection operates at an acceptable LOS and a traffic signal is not warranted. Therefore, no other improvements were recommended at intersection #9. Also, the Traffic Study recommended that a traffic signal be installed at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Byers Road (intersection #10). The recommended improvements for intersection #9 and intersection #10 were imposed on the Project as conditions of approval by the Planning Commission (see Condition of Approval 209).

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15124, a Project Description should not supply extensive detail beyond that needed for evaluation and review of the environmental impact. Because the off-site improvements associated with the proposed Project do not involve significant construction that would impact any of the analyses or conclusions in the EIR, mention of off-site improvements is not required to be included in the Project Description. The off-site improvements associated with the proposed Project are not considered intensive construction work that would expand the scope of project construction impacts already discussed thoroughly in the Draft EIR.

A-9Because the improvement of a 350-foot westbound left-turn lane at the intersection of Ethanac Road and Byers Road does not involve significant construction that would impact any of the analyses or conclusions in the EIR, mention of this off-site improvement is not required to be included in the Project Description. The comment incorrectly assumes that off-site impacts were not evaluated but does not provide any substantial evidence to support this claim. The impacts of project construction, include roadway improvements (i.e. noise, air quality, etc.), were included in the assumptions underlying the technical studies. The City explained in its Responses to Comments in the FEIR (G18 and G21) that there would be no operational/roadway geometric hazards caused by the 350 foot westbound left-turn lane. As such, the DEIR and FEIR adequately incorporated the 350-foot westbound left-turn lane at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Byers Road and all impacts associated therewith.

A-10See Responses to Comments A-8 and A-9.

A-11See Response A-9. As noted in Final EIR Response to Comment G7, the analysis included in the Draft EIR concerning this proposed improvement was provided for informational purposes only for the City’s use in evaluating the Project and considering conditions of approval outside of CEQA’s framework. The implementation of this improvement would be based on direct discussion between City staff and the Applicant and would be imposed via the Conditions of Approval process, not through CEQA. Nevertheless, any improvements to portions of intersections or roadways shared with the City of Perris would be coordinated between the City of Menifee and City of Perris prior to final offsite engineering for the Project. Additionally, the improvements associated with the proposed Project are not considered intensive construction work that would expand the scope of Project construction impacts already discussed thoroughly in the Draft EIR.

A-12The comment incorrectly assumes that off-site impacts were not evaluated but does not provide any substantial evidence to support this claim. Page 2-3 of the Draft EIR describes the Project site Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 112

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
924 of 1464

as 40.03 gross acres. However, CalEEMod output files in Appendix B1 and Appendix G, show that a total of 43.42 acres of development were analyzed as part of air quality and greenhouse gas assessments. The additional acres were included in the analysis under “other asphalt surfaces” to capture construction emissions associated with offsite roadway and infrastructure improvements. As a result, all potential offsite impacts including air quality impacts, energy use, and greenhouse gas emissions were evaluated in the Draft EIR.

A-13The Project includes an early-suppression fast-response (EFSR) fire sprinkler system and will use an electric or diesel-powered fire pump to provide additional water pressure. If an electric fire pump is installed, in the event that the building loses electricity, power for the electric fire pump will be provided by the emergency backup generator. As noted on page 4.2-17 and page 4.7-21 of the Draft EIR, emissions from emergency backup generators are included in the operational air quality and GHG analysis of the Project. The comment therefore incorrectly indicates that emergency fire water pump emissions are not addressed, as these emissions are addressed by the backup generator emissions in the Draft EIR.

However, diesel fuel consumption from the generator was not included in the energy analysis.

Conservatively assuming the emergency generator is tested for one hour per week as modeled in the air quality and GHG sections of the EIR instead of the half hour per week as required, the generator would consume 1,970 gallons of diesel per year. This would increase diesel fuel consumption by 0.99 percent, increasing from 199,539 gallons to 201,509 gallons per year. Due to the small increase in diesel consumption associated with the operation of the generator, the percentage increase of diesel fuel in Riverside County, associated with the Project would remain

0.08 percent as identified in Table 4.5-4: Project Annual Energy Use During Operations of the Draft EIR and impacts associated with energy would remain the same.

A-14The commenter notes that diesel powered fire pumps must be tested on a weekly basis for a minimum of 30 minutes. Conservatively, the analysis for this Project assumed that diesel generators would operate for one hour every week and included those emissions in Table 4.2-9 and 4.2-10 of the Air Quality Section and Table 4.7-3 of the GHG Section of the Draft EIR.

Therefore, the Draft EIR analysis conservatively overestimates the contribution from stationary diesel emissions sources by assuming one hour of testing rather than 30 minutes of testing.

A-15Refer to Responses A-13 and A-14. No further response is warranted.

A-16Refer to Responses A-13, A-14, and A-15 above. All analysis and technical studies for the Draft EIR have been prepared following the appropriate methodologies. All potential impacts have been addressed.

A-17The City of Perris prior comment letters raised concerns regarding traffic safety hazards due to queuing on Ethanac Road at Byers Road that will be constructed by the Project (G-18, G-21), the configuration of Barnett Road and Case Road (G-25), and queuing along Ethanac Road at the I-215 interchange (G-31). See Responses to Comments G-18, G-21, G-25, and G-31 in the Final EIR how the Project will not create safety hazards due to geometric design.

In addition, Ethanac is generally a straight and flat road, with good visibility, no visual obstructions, and no sharp curves. It should also be noted that the Project would add only eastbound and Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 113

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
925 of 1464

westbound through traffic at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Barnett Road/Case Road; therefore, the project would not impact or worsen the potential issue of the northbound/southbound offset between Barnett Road and Case Road. Further, based on the Project Traffic Study, the intersection of Ethanac Road at Barnett Road/Case Road does not decline to an unacceptable Level of Service with the addition of Project traffic. Therefore, the City of Perris' reliance on LOS/queuing analysis to prove a safety impact at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Barnett Road/Case Road has no support.

Also, queuing progression and congestion does not automatically mean there is a safety hazard.

As such, for the reasons noted above in this response, there is no evidence that those occurrences will create safety hazards in this case and the City of Perris has not provided any evidence to the contrary.

It should be noted that the Project will be directly constructing several of the Traffic Study’s recommended improvements (imposed as conditions of approval by the Planning Commission), including constructing a traffic light and the 350’ turn pocket on Ethanac Road at Byers Road, modifying Wheat Street at Ethanac Road to a right-in, right-out (RIRO) only access, adding a traffic signal at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Evans Road, as well as adding turn lanes and road widening. These improvements will further improve safety conditions in the study area and would not create hazards due to geometric design features.

A-18Ethanac Road is currently a truck route. A global Traffic Study for the Menifee Economic Development Corridor (MEDC) and surrounding area, including the possible addition of a truck corridor south of Ethanac Road, is currently being prepared in coordination with the City of Menifee and the City of Perris. However, the global Traffic Study has not been completed nor has any roadway other than Ethanac Road been designated as a truck route that can serve the Project, and thus this Project cannot speculate on or study alternative trucks routes that may or may not later be identified. Therefore, it is appropriate that the Project Traffic Study analyzes trucks utilizing Ethanac Road to determine recommended improvements along Ethanac Road at full buildout of the MEDC and surrounding area.

Based on discussion with City of Perris staff, it is understood that the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by RK Engineering in June 2023 is in reference to a supplemental queuing analysis conducted by RK Engineering along Ethanac Road at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Barnett Road/Case Road as part of an Comment Letter in support of Appeal, prepared by the City of Perris, for the Ethanac and Barnett Development Project in the City of Menifee. As noted in Response to Comment A-17, Ethanac is generally a straight and flat road, with good visibility, no visual obstructions, and no sharp curves. The Project would add only eastbound and westbound through traffic at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Barnett Road/Case Road; therefore, the project would not impact or worsen the potential issue of the northbound/southbound offset between Barnett Road and Case Road. Therefore, the City of Perris' reliance on a queuing analysis to prove a safety impact caused by the Project at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Barnett Road/Case Road has no support.

A-19Refer to Response to Comment G-17 in the Final EIR regarding review of compliance with the City of Perris Level of Service standards and significance criteria for study intersections located entirely or a majority within the City of Perris. As Level of Service is no longer a CEQA threshold for Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 114

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
926 of 1464

transportation impacts, the analysis to confirm compliance with the City of Perris Level of Service standards and significance criteria was not included in the DEIR.

The City of Perris General Plan Circulation Element does not provide traffic safety impact criteria relevant to the Project and the City of Perris did not provide enough specifics in their comment to evaluate this comment further.

A-20The City of Menifee has responded to all comments raised by City of Perris regarding traffic safety hazards due to a geometric design feature. Refer to Response to Comment A-17. No further response is warranted. For impacts related to air quality and noise, refer to Response to Comment A-12.

A-21Refer to Response to Comment A-17. No further response is warranted.

A-22Refer to Response to Comment A-17. No further response is warranted.

A-23Refer to Response to Comment A-17. No further response is warranted.

A-24Refer to Response to Comment A-17. No further response is warranted.

A-25Refer to Response to Comment A-17. No further response is warranted.

A-26Refer to Response to Comment A-17. No further response is warranted.

A-27Ethanac Road is currently a truck route. A global Traffic Study for the Menifee Economic Development Corridor (MEDC) and surrounding area, including the possible addition of a truck corridor south of Ethanac Road, is currently being prepared in coordination with the City of Menifee and the City of Perris. However, the global Traffic Study has not been completed nor has any roadway other than Ethanac been designated as a truck route that can serve the Project, and thus this Project cannot speculate on or study alternative trucks routes that may or may not later be identified. Therefore, it is appropriate that the Project Traffic Study analyzes trucks utilizing Ethanac Road to determine recommended improvements along Ethanac Road at full buildout of the MEDC and surrounding area. Additionally, there is no reason to include a failure analysis as part of the global Traffic Study.

A-28The February 2023 traffic counts for overlapping intersections in the Project Traffic Study are provided in Attachment B to this Response to Comment matrix. Based on comparison of the February 2023 volumes and the October 2021 volumes used in the Project Traffic Study, it is noted that, compared to February 2023 volumes, the October 2021 volumes are higher at the intersections of Ethanac Road at I-215 SB Ramps (Intersection #14) and Ethanac Road at I-215 NB Ramps (Intersection #15), as well as lower at the intersection of Murrieta Road at Ethanac Road (Intersection #11). The variance in existing volumes between the October 2021 and February 2023 at the three noted locations are within 10%. As such, the traffic counts in the Project Traffic Study are considered reasonable, as well as conservative in some locations as noted above.

A-29The City of Fontana Truck Trip Generation Study is not considered outdated in the industry and is widely accepted and used by many cities in the Inland Empire, including as noted in the City of Menifee LOS Traffic Study Guidelines (October 2020), as a method for obtaining truck trips and truck splits. Further, the truck mix in the Fontana Truck Trip Generation Study is comparable to Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 115

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
927 of 1464

the SCAQMD truck mix recommendations. Also, as noted in the Project Traffic Study, the passenger car/truck splits are based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition Supplement), which is comparable to the passenger car/truck splits in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition). Nevertheless, in order to address this comment, the passenger car/truck split and truck mix for the proposed Project have been reviewed based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) for the passenger car/truck splits and the SCAQMD Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage (dated July 17, 2014) for the truck mix (i.e. 2-axle, 3-axle, 4+axle trucks) . A copy of the noted resources is provided in Attachment A (Passenger Car/Truck Splits and Truck Mix Information) to this response matrix.

The passenger car equivalent (PCE) factors as noted in the Traffic Study were also applied to these trip generation estimates. Based on the methodology noted above, the Project is estimated to generate approximately 4,719 daily PCE trips, with 632 PCE trips (512 inbound and 120 outbound) in the morning peak hour and 860 PCE trips (335 inbound and 525 outbound) in the evening peak hour.

Compared to the trip estimates in the approved Traffic Study, the trip estimates based on the SCAQMD methodology (inclusive of ITE 11th Edition for the passenger car/truck splits) is estimated to generate 3 additional daily PCE trips, with 7 fewer PCE trips in the morning peak hour and 19 fewer PCE trips in the evening peak hour.

Accordingly, as described above, the use of ITE 11th Edition passenger car/truck splits and SCAQMD truck mix percentages would not change the significance determinations in the Draft EIR and would not require new or modified mitigation measures. Therefore, the Final EIR and approved Traffic Study are not flawed and do not need to be modified.

A-30Refer to Response to Comment A-29. No further response is warranted.

A-31Refer to Response to Comment A-29. No further response is warranted.

A-32The study intersections in the Project’s Traffic Study are based on the Traffic Scoping Agreement approved by the City of Menifee. The intersection of Green Valley Parkway and Ethanac Road was not part of the approved list of study intersections as it is a future intersection that does not provide direct access to the Project. It should also be noted that the Project would add only eastbound and westbound through traffic on Ethanac Road at the future intersection of Green Valley Parkway and Ethanac Road and would therefore not directly impact the Green Valley Parkway approach at the future intersection.

A-33Acknowledged. At the time of data collection (October 2021), the southbound approach for Intersection #11 (Murrieta Road at Ethanac Road) reflected one dedicated left-turn lane, one through lane, and one dedicated right-turn lane. As a result, the existing lane geometry was reflected as such in the Project Traffic Study. Based on review of applying the updated lane geometry to Intersection #11 under Opening Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project conditions, the overall intersection delay for Intersection #11 would nominally increase as noted below:
•AM Peak Hour
o2021 SB Approach: 119.3 sec/vehicle
oCurrent SB Approach: 120.3 sec/vehicle
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 116

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
928 of 1464

•PM Peak Hour
o2021 SB Approach: 543.1 sec/vehicle
oCurrent SB Approach: 550.4 sec/vehicle
Intersection analysis worksheets for Intersection #11 under Opening Year Cumulative Plus Project conditions is provided as an Attachment to this Response to Comment matrix. As noted above, the lane geometry update to the SB approach of Intersection #11 would not change the recommended improvements at Intersection #11. With the noted recommended improvements in the Project Traffic Study, Intersection #11 would operate at an acceptable LOS.

A-34The walk and pedestrian clearance time is accounted for in the Vistro traffic modeling software based on standard HCM defaults for walk time (4-7 seconds) and pedestrian crossing speed (3.5 feet per second).

A-35The walk and pedestrian clearance time is accounted for in the Vistro traffic modeling software based on standard HCM defaults for walk time (4-7 seconds) and pedestrian crossing speed (3.5 feet per second). The City of Menifee has responded to all comments raised by City of Perris regarding traffic safety hazards due to a geometric design feature. Refer to Response A-17. No further response is warranted.

A-36A separate signalized intersection typically has its own traffic signal cabinet, which is located on a corner of the intersection to which the signal cabinet is connected to. The traffic signal cabinet assigns phasing, signal timing, and cycle length that direct the operation of the individual traffic signal. In the case of the intersection of Ethanac Road at Barnett Road/Case Road, there is only one traffic signal cabinet located south of Ethanac Road between the two offset legs of the intersection. As such, while the northbound and southbound approaches are offset, the intersection operates as one signalized intersection that has connected phasing, signal timing, and cycle length. As a result, the intersection of Barnett Road/Case Road at Ethanac Road operates as one intersection and should be analyzed as one for analysis purposes. The comment suggests that the offset nature of Barnett Road and Case Road (the north/south roads at this intersection) causes a safety hazard and that the Project will exacerbate those issues. It should be noted that the Project does not take direct access from Barnett Road and would add only eastbound and westbound through traffic on Ethanac Road at the intersection of Ethanac Road at Barnett Road/Case Road. Therefore, the Project would not directly impact the turn pockets at the intersection and would not create or exacerbate turning hazards due to geometric design features.

A-37The analysis does account for the “no right-turn on red” sign. In the traffic analysis model used for the Project Traffic Study, there is an input to indicate vehicles making a right turn on red, which typically would lower the overall delay of the intersection. As a conservative analysis in the Project Traffic Study, this input was not selected and no "right turn on red" vehicles were assumed on any of the approaches at the Intersection #13 (Barnett Road/Case Road at Ethanac Road).

A-38It should be noted that the Project would only add eastbound and westbound through traffic at the intersection of Barnett Road/Case Road at Ethanac Road. Therefore, the Project would not directly impact the turn pockets or turning movement at the intersection and thus would not create or exacerbate turning hazards due to geometric design features at this intersection.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 117

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
929 of 1464

Further, based on review of the SWITRS data noted in the Comment from 2015-2017, there were three rear-end collisions for vehicles traveling eastbound or westbound at the intersection.

Generally, improvements are recommended based on accident data for safety purposes if there are at least five accidents that are similar in nature (i.e. rear end) within a consecutive 12-month period where the accident could be mitigated with a geometric improvement (California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, CA MUTCD). Based on review of the SWITRS data noted above and the TIMS data reference in the Comment from 2020-2023, there is not at least five accidents that are similar in nature within a consecutive 12-month period that would be caused or enhanced by the addition of eastbound and westbound through Project traffic at the intersection of Barnett Road/Case Road at Ethanac Road (Intersection #13). Therefore, no improvements are required of the Project at this intersection and the Project would not create hazards due to geometric design features.

A-39Refer to Response to Comment A-36. No further response is warranted.

A-40It is noted that the overall intersection delay improves with the addition of Project traffic under Existing Plus Project conditions at Intersection #6 (SR-74 at Sherman Road), Intersection #7 (Goetz Road at Fieldstone Drive), Intersection #13 (Barnett Road/Case Road at Ethanac Road), and at Intersection #23 (Sun City Boulevard at McCall Boulevard). Delay at signalized intersections is calculated based on the overall average of delay on each approach. The decrease in overall average delay for the noted intersections is due to the addition of Project traffic to an approach with a lower delay than the other approaches, which brings the overall average of all delay down for the intersection.

A-41See Response to Comment A-36. Based on the Project Traffic Study, the intersection of Barnett Road/Case Road at Ethanac Road (Intersection #13) would operate at an acceptable LOS under Opening Year 2024 Cumulative Plus Project conditions. Therefore, no improvements are recommended at this study intersection in the Project Traffic Study. The Project Traffic Study only provides recommended improvements to study intersections and roadway segments that would cause the deficient study locations to operate at an acceptable LOS and would more than offset the Project-related effect.

A-42The Project Traffic Study only provides recommended improvements to study intersections and roadway segments that would cause the deficient study locations to operate at an acceptable LOS and would more than offset the Project-related effect. The implementation of improvements is based on direct discussion between City staff and the Applicant via the Conditions of Approval process. Condition of Approval 209 for the proposed Project notes that the Project is conditioned to construct all improvements recommended in the Project Traffic Study for the following intersections:
•#9 - Wheat Street at Ethanac Road
•#10 - Byers Road at Ethanac Road
•#12 - Evans Road at Ethanac Road
Based on Table 4 of the Project Traffic Study, the intersection of I-215 NB Ramps at Ethanac Road (#15) would have a direct project effect. Due to the regional nature and scope of Intersection #15 as part of the Ethanac Road/I-215 interchange, the Project will be contributing a fair-share Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 118

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
930 of 1464

payment per Condition of Approval #212, instead of directly constructing improvements. It should be noted that the Ethanac Road/I-215 interchange has been identified as a Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) project.

Therefore, the Project's payment of TUMF fees will cover additional costs to TUMF projects, such as the Ethanac Road/I-215 interchange. Nevertheless, the recommended improvements to deficient study locations are to address automobile delay, which are no longer CEQA impacts and therefore, not required improvements to mitigate CEQA-related impacts. A-43Refer to Response A-42. No further response is warranted.

A-44Refer to Response A12 regarding offsite improvements. Refer to Response A14 regarding the testing of diesel-powered fire pumps and/or diesel generators.

A-45The commenter notes that the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment used CalEEMod version 2020.4 and acknowledges that SCAQMD recommended that all air quality analyses conducted after December 21, 2022 use the latest version of CalEEMod. Consistent with SCAQMD’s recommendations, the air quality and greenhouse gas modeling for the Project was initially completed in August 2022 with additional modeling completed in October 2022 to incorporate mitigation required by the Health Risk Assessment (HRA). Therefore, all modeling for the Project was completed before CalEEMod 2022 was approved for full release. As a result, CalEEMod version 2020.4 was the latest available software at the time the analysis was conducted.

A-46Refer to Response A-12.

A-47 MM AQ-3 requires the Project operator to submit a TDM program to the City. This measure provides employees with information regarding the use of public transportation, carpooling/vanpooling, and walking or biking to work, rather than driving to work every day. The development and submission of this plan is the performance standard for this mitigation measure, as the Project cannot compel employees not to drive their own vehicles to work. As a result, it is not possible to require an absolute VMT reduction as a mitigation target, however TDM programs are commonly used in the industry and are supported by CAPCOA,1 CARB,2 SCAQMD,3 and SCAG4 as a VMT (and thus air quality and GHG) reduction strategy. The commenter implies that this mitigation measure is the main source of NO X reductions that reduced emission to less than significant levels, however CalEEMod only took credit for 0.3 percent reduction of NOX emissions associated with MM AQ-3. Although not acknowledged by the commenter, MM AQ-4, which requires all cargo handling equipment to be zero emissions, is the main source of NO X emission reduction which resulted in less than significant levels.

A-48As discussed in Response A-12, the CalEEMod modeling for the Project included an additional 3.39 acres to conservatively include all offsite improvements associated with the Project. CalEEMod provides a list of typical construction equipment based on the size of the Project site and the types of land uses proposed. As a result, all construction equipment necessary for the offsite 1 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. page 76. https://www.airquality.org/ClimateChange/Documents/Handbook%20Public%20Draft_2021-Aug.pdf 2 California Air Resources Board. page 100. https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2019- 11/Final%20SCS%20Program%20and%20Evaluation%20Guidelines%20Appendices.pdf 3 South Coast AQMD. page 4-52. https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management-plans/2022- air-quality-management-plan/final-2022-aqmp/07-ch4.pdf?sfvrsn=6 4 Southern California Association of Governments. https://scag.ca.gov/TDM Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 119

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
931 of 1464

improvements identified in the Traffic Study, located in Appendix K of the Draft EIR, have been included in the construction noise model. As shown in Table 4.11-9: Project Construction Noise Levels of the Draft EIR, construction noise would not exceed noise thresholds and therefore would not result in a significant noise impact.

A-49The commenter seems to suggest that the cumulative noise threshold used in the analysis was not correct but does not provide details regarding what threshold the commenter believes is appropriate. Cumulative noise impacts are discussed on pages 4.11-25 through 4.11-27 of the Draft EIR. As discussed in response A-50 below, consistent with CEQA, a two-step process for determining cumulative noise impacts was used in the analysis.

A-50In accordance with CEQA Guidelines, the Draft EIR addresses the cumulative noise impacts by addressing the following two step process: (1) whether the effects of the Project combined with other projects are cumulatively significant and (2) whether the Project’s incremental contribution to the impact is cumulatively considerable. Draft EIR Table 4.11-13: Cumulative Off-Site Traffic Noise Levels identifies both the combined and incremental noise increases.

Draft EIR Table 4.11-13 shows the combined traffic noise levels of the Project and other future projects would increase noise levels over 3 dBA above existing conditions at two roadway segments on Ethanac Road, one between Wheat Street and Murrietta Road and the other between Murrieta Road and Evans Road. These two roadway segments satisfy the first step, in identifying cumulative impacts. Therefore, the Draft EIR identifies the cumulative impact.

However, the Project’s incremental contribution to these impacts is not cumulatively considerable as the incremental contribution must exceed 1.0 dBA to be considered significant.

As shown in Table 4.11-13, the incremental increase associated with the Project at these roadway segments are 0.99 dBA and 0.72 dBA. As discussed previously, to be considered a cumulatively significant impact, an impact must satisfy both conditions of the two-step cumulative process. As shown in Table 4.11-13, none of the roadway segments satisfy both conditions, therefore the Project’s incremental effect would not be cumulatively considerable, and the Project would not result in cumulatively significant impacts.

The comment incorrectly states that the Draft EIR does not identify a significant impact. As noted above, the Draft EIR identified the cumulative impact. However, the Draft EIR determines that this impact would not be cumulatively considerable and therefore not significant.

A-51As stated in Final EIR Response to Comment G10, CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 requires that a project provide a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives. An EIR need not consider every conceivable alternative to a project.

Rather it must consider a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives that will foster informed decision making and public participation. The City deemed that, for this Project, having two alternatives for the Project provides an adequate range of alternatives pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, because those were the alternatives determined which could reduce the Project’s significant effects while still meeting most of the basic Project objectives.

A-52Refer to Response to Comment A-51 above.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 120

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
932 of 1464

A-53This comment is a conclusion of the City of Perris’ appeal letter and does not raise any substantive issues. No further response is warranted.

A-54This comment is an attachment of the City of Perris’ letter submitted to the City of Menifee containing initial comments on December 22, 2021. Those initial comments were addressed in the Draft EIR. No further response is warranted.

A-55This comment is an attachment of the City of Perris’ letter submitted to the City of Menifee on the NOP on May 16, 2022. The comments on the NOP were taken into consideration and incorporated as appropriate into the Draft EIR. No further response is warranted.

A-56 This comment is an attachment of the City of Perris’ letter submitted to the City of Menifee during the public review period of the Draft EIR on April 26, 2024. This letter was fully responded to as part of the Final EIR for the project dated August 2024. No further response is warranted.

A-57Refer to Response to Comment A-54 above.

A-58Refer to Response to Comment A-55 above.

A-59This comment is an attachment of the City of Perris’ letter submitted to the City of Menifee in consideration of the Final EIR approval by City of Menifee Planning Commission on August 14, 2024. No further response is warranted.

A-60The City of Perris’s email correspondence with the City of Menifee from June 11, 2024 has been noted and no further response is warranted.

A-61Refer to Response to Comment A-54 above.

A-62Refer to Response to Comment A-55 above.

A-63Refer to Response to Comment A-56 above.

A-64Refer to Response to Comment A-56 above. The comment also includes FEIR Responses to Comments to the City of Perris’ letter. No further response is warranted.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 121

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
933 of 1464

RESOLUTION NO. 24-______

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA DENYING APPEAL NO. PLN24-0169 OF THE CADO

MENIFEE INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE PROJECT (TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. PLN22-0041 AND PLOT PLAN NO. PLN21-0370) WHEREAS, on November 15, 2021, the applicant, CADO Menifee, LLC (“Applicant”), filed a formal application with the City of Menifee for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) to consolidate eight parcels into one industrial parcel for a total of approximately 40.03 gross acres and 36.81 net acres, and Plot Plan (PP) No. PLN21-0370 for the construction of a 700,037 square-foot warehouse/industrial building with 10,000 square feet of office space and 690,037 square feet of warehouse space on the same 40.03 gross acre site (the “Project”). The Project site is generally located north of Corsica Lane, south of Kuffel Road, east of Wheat Street, and west of Byers Road within the City of Menifee (City), County of Riverside, State of California (APNs: 330-190-002 through -005 and 330-190-010 through -013); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared to analyze and mitigate the Project's potentially significant environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, on August 14, 2024, at a legally noticed public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 3-1-1 to certify the EIR and approve TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN21-0370 for the Project; and
WHEREAS, on August 20, 2024, an application to appeal Planning Commission certification of the EIR for the Project and approval of TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN21-0370 was submitted by the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance; and
WHEREAS, on November 6, 2024, the City Council of the City of Menifee held a public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission’s certification of the EIR and approval of TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN21-0370 and Resolution Nos. PC24-0639 and PC24-0640, considered all public testimony as well as all materials in the staff report and accompanying documents for the appeal, which hearing was publicly noticed by a publication in The Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation, an agenda posting, notice to property owners within 300 feet of the Project boundaries, on-site posting at the Project site, and to persons requesting public notice.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Menifee hereby approves the following:

1. That the City Council finds the facts presented within the public record and within the Resolution provides the basis to deny Appeal No. PLN24-0169 and uphold the Planning Commission certification of the EIR and approval of TPM No. 38139 (PLN22-0041) and PP No. PLN21-0370 and Resolution Nos. PC24-0639 and PC24-0640.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 122

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
934 of 1464

Appeal of CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project - GSEJA October 2, 2024

Page 2 of 2 ends

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
935 of 1464

Appeal Letter B
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 124

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
936 of 1464

1 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 125

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
937 of 1464

2 3
4 5
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 126

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
938 of 1464

Cont.
5 6
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 127

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
939 of 1464

7 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 128

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
940 of 1464

8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 129

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
941 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 130

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
942 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 131

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
943 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 132

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
944 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 133

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
945 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 134

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
946 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 135

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
947 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 136

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
948 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 137

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
949 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 138

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
950 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 139

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
951 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 140

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
952 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 141

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
953 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 142

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
954 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 143

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
955 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 144

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
956 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 145

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
957 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 146

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
958 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 147

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
959 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 148

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
960 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 149

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
961 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 150

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
962 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 151

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
963 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 152

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
964 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 153

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
965 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 154

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
966 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 155

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
967 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 156

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
968 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 157

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
969 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 158

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
970 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 159

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
971 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 160

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
972 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 161

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
973 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 162

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
974 of 1464

Cont.
8 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 163

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
975 of 1464

9 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 164

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
976 of 1464

City of Menifee
CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project
Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance Appeal Comments and Responses B-1This comment summarizes Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance (GSEJA)’s reasons for their appeal letter, requesting that a new EIR be prepared due to the deficiencies of the EIR and potential health concerns to the City of Menifee’s citizens. Refer to Response to Comment B-6 below for further information.

B-2GSEJA’s opinion that the City of Menifee Planning Commission did not adequately investigate or mitigate the impacts of this Project is noted. CEQA does not require adoption of every imaginable mitigation measure. CEQA’s requirement applies only to feasible mitigation that will “substantially lessen” a project’s significant effects (Public Resources Code Section 21002). As explained by one court: A lead agency's “duty to condition project approval on incorporation of feasible mitigation measures only exists when such measures would [avoid or] ‘substantially lessen’ a significant environmental effect.” (San Franciscans for Reasonable Growth v. City and County of San Francisco (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1502, 1519.) “Thus, the agency need not, under CEQA, adopt every nickel and dime mitigation scheme brought to its attention or proposed in the project EIR.” (Ibid.) Rather, an EIR should focus on mitigation measures that are feasible, practical, and effective (Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Board of Supervisors (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 342, 365.). As disclosed in the EIR and supported by substantial evidence in the record, the Project’s EIR includes all feasible mitigation measures that are capable of substantially reducing the Project’s environmental impacts and therefore, the City of Menifee Planning Commission’s approval considered these factors. Lastly, GSEJA fails to provide any evidence supporting their claim that the Project’s EIR did not sufficiently analyze all environmental impacts, per Appendix G Environmental Checklist Form, to the CEQA Guidelines.

B-3GSEJA’s opinion of the City of Menifee Planning Commission’s understanding of the CEQA is noted. No further response is warranted.

B-4This comment lists bullet points summarizing GSEJA’s understanding of the purpose of CEQA. No further response is warranted.

B-5The City agrees that environmental justice is an important topic but GSEJA continues to fail to understand that CEQA does not require consideration of potential implications to environmental justice or socioeconomics as a specific resource. Furthermore, “environmental justice” is not listed within the “Environmental Factors Potentially Affected” in Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form, to the CEQA Guidelines. Nonetheless, CalEnviroScreen was discussed in Draft EIR Appendix B, Health Risk Assessment (HRA) and the results of the HRA were summarized in Impact

4.2-3 of Draft EIR Section 4.2, Air Quality pertaining to the Project’s impacts to sensitive receptors.

An example of the Project’s commitment to reduce health risk to nearby sensitive receptors is further discussed in Draft EIR Section 4.2 (page 4.2-34). The Project’s implementation of Mitigation Measure (MM) HRA-1 would require that the Project use Tier 4 construction equipment or incorporation of CARB Level 3 Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategy (VDECS) Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 165

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
977 of 1464

which would reduce cancer risk to 1.8 in one million, which is well below SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million.

B-6The commenter provides a table of data from CalEnviroscreen for Census Tract 6065042731.

Although the CalEnviroscreen scores are based on 21 indicators, the table only provides data on the worst 12 indicators which gives the false impression that the area is disproportionately impacted (note that the table does show that the Pollution Burden Percentile is only 45%). As discussed in Appendix B2 (Health Risk Assessment), CalEnviroScreen and the environmental justice factors are disclosed on pages 11-12. CEQA does not require consideration of potential implications to environmental justice or socioeconomics as a specific resource, further, environmental justice is not listed within the “Environmental Factors Potentially Affected” in Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form, to the CEQA Guidelines. Furthermore, as discussed within the Draft EIR, the proposed Project would not result in significant and unavoidable air quality impacts. Localized air quality impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, even if the topic of environmental justice was a required topic within the “Environmental Factors Potentially Affected” in Appendix G, Environmental Checklist Form, there would not be impacts to local residents as a result of approval of the proposed Project. Therefore, there are no significant impacts to local residents as a result of approval of the proposed Project. This comment is noted and will be provided to the decision makers for review and consideration. Because the comment does not raise a substantive issue on the content of the Draft EIR, no further response is warranted.

B-7This is a conclusion comment suggesting that the EIR is flawed and new EIR must be prepared and recirculated. This letter did not provide any substantial or factual evidence that supports GSEJA’s claim that the EIR is “flawed” or inadequate document. GSEJA also did not provide any evidence suggesting that the responses provided to the commenter’s April 26, 2024 letter submitted during the Project’s public review period of the Draft EIR were insufficient in addressing their previous concerns. The City urges GSEJA review the City’s responses to GSEJA’s letter in the FEIR.

B-8This is a copy of GSEJA’s letter submitted during the Project’s public review period of the Draft EIR. No additional comments were made, and the City suggests that the comment refer back to the City’s responses to their letter for further explanation and clarity.

B-9This is a receipt of GSEJA’s appeal fee. No further comment is warranted.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 166

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
978 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 EXHIBIT “A”

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: Plot Plan No. PLN 21-0370 and Tentative Parcel Map No. PLN 22-0041 (“CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project”)
Project Description: Plot Plan No. No. PLN 21-0370 proposes a 700,037 square foot warehouse/industrial building with 10,000 square feet of office space and 690,037 square feet of warehouse space on a 36.8 net acre (40.03 gross acre) site. The project will provide a total of 499 vehicular parking stalls and 245 trailer stalls. There will be three (3) points of access on Byers Road and two (2) points of access on Wheat Street.

Tentative Parcel Map No. PLN 22-0041 (TPM 38139) proposes to consolidate 8 parcels into one (1) industrial parcel. The Project site is approximately 40.03 gross acres and 36.81 net acres.

The project site is located north of Corsica Lane, south of Kuffel Road, east of Wheat Street and west of Byers Road.

State Clearinghouse No.:2022040622
Assessor's Parcel No.:330-190-002 through -005 and -010 through -013 MSHCP Category:Non-residential (Industrial)
DIF Category:Industrial
TUMF Category:Determined by Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
Quimby Category:N/A
Approval Date:August 14, 2024
Expiration Date: August 14, 2027
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 167

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
979 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Section I: Community Development Department Conditions of Approval
Section II: Engineering/Grading/Transportation Conditions of Approval
Section III: Building and Safety Department Conditions of Approval
Section IV: Riverside County Fire Department Conditions of Approval
Section V: Riverside County Environmental Health
Conditions of Approval
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 168

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
980 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Section I:

Community Development Department
Conditions of Approval
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 169

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
981 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. Indemnification. Within 48 hours of project approval, the Applicant/developer shall submit the necessary agreements to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Menifee and its elected city council, appointed boards, commissions, committees, officials, employees, volunteers, contractors, consultants, and agents from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, fines, penalties, and expenses, including without limitation litigation expenses and attorney’s fees, arising out of either the City’s approval of the Project or actions related to the Property or the acts, omissions, or operations of the applicant/developer and its directors, officers, members, partners, employees, agents, contractors, and subcontractors of each person or entity comprising the applicant/developer with respect to the ownership, planning, design, construction, and maintenance of the Project and the Property for which the Project is being approved.

2. Filing Notice of Determination. Within 48 hours of project approval, the Planning Division will determine the appropriate fees for the Notice of Determination (NOD) filing and request the payment of fees to the City of Menifee in the form of a check or cash.

Upon receipt of payment, the Planning Division will file the NOD with the relevant agencies as required under Public Resources Code, California Code of Regulations and California Fish and Game Code.

3. Exhibits. The project shall be constructed as approved by the Planning Commission on August 14, 2024, and as shown in Attachment No. 1 in the accompanying staff report.

Any subsequent changes shall be processed per Menifee Municipal Code Section

9.30.120 Modifications to Previously Approved Permits.

4. Mitigation Monitoring. The applicant shall comply with, prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Director demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval and mitigation measures of this Project which must be satisfied prior to the issuance of a grading permit for review and approval. The Community Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to ensure such compliance.

5. Ninety (90) Days. The applicant has ninety (90) days from the date of approval of these conditions to protest, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020, the imposition of any and all fees, dedications, reservations and/or other exactions imposed on this project as a result of this approval or conditional approval of this project.

6. Subsequent Submittals. Any subsequent submittals required by these Conditions of Approval, including but not limited to grading plan, building plan or mitigation monitoring review shall include appropriate fees paid as may be in effect at the time of submittal, as required by Resolution No. 24-1423 (Cost of Services Fee Study), or any successor thereto. Each submittal shall be accompanied with a letter clearly indicating which condition or conditions the submittal is intended to comply with.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 170

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
982 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 7. Expiration Date. This approval shall become null and void three (3) years from the date of approval, unless the appropriate permits have been obtained and construction, defined as permit obtainment, commencement of construction of the primary building on site, and successful completion of the first Building and Safety Division inspection, or an extension of time application has been submitted to the Planning Division prior to the expiration date. Extensions may be granted per Menifee Municipal Code.

8. Place of Sale. The General Contractor/Developer is requiring that all contractors and subcontractors on the site direct local tax to the City of Menifee wherever possible. This direction will not increase the contractor’s tax liability; however, it will increase the percentage amount of tax revenue the City will receive. The Developer is requiring the contractors and subcontractors work together with City officials and consultants to achieve an equitable outcome.

The Developer will require the contractors and subcontractors to exercise their option to obtain a California Department of Tax & Fee Administration sub-permit for the job site and allocate all eligible use tax payments to the City of Menifee. This condition applies to only those contractors/sub-contractors with individual contracts over $5 million. Prior to any construction on-site, the developer will require the contractor and subcontractor to provide the City of Menifee with either a copy of their sub-permit that shows their CDTFA account number or a signed statement that sales and use tax does not apply to their portion of the project. The Developer/Contractor will provide the City/County and their consultant with a list of subcontractors associated with the project.

9. Modifications or Revisions. The applicant shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project pursuant to Menifee Municipal Code Section 9.30.120 (Modifications to Previously Approved Permits), and such requests.

10. Comply with Ordinances. This project shall comply with the applicable standards of the City of Menifee Development Code, City of Menifee Municipal Code, City of Menifee Design Guidelines and all other applicable ordinances and State and Federal codes and regulations.

11. Map Act Compliance. This land division shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all requirements of Title 7 of the City of Menifee Municipal Code, unless modified by the conditions listed herein.

12. Causes for Revocation. In the event the use hereby permitted under this permit, a) is found to be in violation of the terms and conditions of this permit, b) is found to have been obtained by fraud or perjured testimony, or c) is found to be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare, or is a public nuisance, this permit may be subject to the City’s authority to initiate applicable permit revocation procedures.

13. Reclaimed Water. The permittee shall connect to a reclaimed water supply for landscape watering purposes if secondary reclaimed water is available to the site at the time of grading permit issuance or as required by Eastern Municipal Water District.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 171

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
983 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 14. Outside Lighting. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way and so as to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky.

15. Phases. Construction of this project may be done progressively in phases provided a phasing map is submitted with appropriate fees to the Planning Division and approved prior to issuance of any building permits.

16. Development Impact Fees. The applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees including but not limited to Development Impact (DIF), Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Quimby, Stephen’s Kangaroo Rat (KRAT), School Fees, Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD), and Area Drainage Plan (ADP).

17. Outside Agencies. The applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions of approval from any responsible agencies as shown in the attached letters from associated agencies.

18. Anti-Graffiti Coating. An anti-graffiti coating shall be provided on all block walls constructed as part of any phase of the Project, and written verification from the developer shall be provided to the Community Development Department.

19. Property Maintenance. All parkways, entryway medians, on-site and off-site landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, basins, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the owner or private entity or the City of Menifee Community Facilities District (CFD).

All landscaping and similar improvements not properly maintained by a property owners association, individual property owners, or the common area maintenance director must be annexed into a Lighting and Landscape District, or other mechanism as determined by the City of Menifee.

The land divider, or any successor-in-interest to the land divider, shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems within the land division until such time as those operations are the responsibility of a property owner’s association, or any other successor-in-interest.

The owners of each individual lot shall be responsible for maintaining all landscaping between the curb of the street and the proposed sidewalk and side yard landscaping between the curb of the street and proposed fencing, unless the landscaping is included within a separate common lot maintained by an HOA or other entity acceptable to the City of Menifee.

20. Business Registration. Every person conducting a business within the City of Menifee, as defined in Menifee Municipal Code, Chapter 5.01, shall obtain a business license.

For more information regarding business registration, contact the Finance Department.

21. Cold Storage Prohibited. Per the Environmental Impact Report Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan, prior to the issuance of building permits and prior to issuance of tenant occupancy permits, the City of Menifee Community Development Department shall confirm that the Project does not include cold storage equipment for warehousing Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 172

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
984 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 purposes. Cold storage was not included in the Environmental Impact Report and is therefore prohibited.

22. Loading Areas. Loading and/or unloading of goods/supplies shall occur in designated loading areas as shown on the approved exhibits. No loading or unloading is allowed within drive aisles, parking areas, or on adjacent public streets. Loading areas shall be kept free of debris and clean throughout the life of this plot plan.

23. Outdoor Storage. No outdoor storage is allowed unless otherwise approved as part of the project.

24. Screening. Sliding gates into loading areas visible from the street shall be constructed with wrought iron or tubular steel and perforated metal screening or equivalent durable material. The gate shall be painted to complement adjacent walls.

25. Sound Dampening. The design of dock-high loading doors shall minimize noise through installation of devices such as rubber seals and/or other sound-dampening features, and shall be included on the tenant improvement building permit plans.

Landscaping

26. Interim Landscaping. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a condition so as to prevent a dust and/or blow sand nuisance and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures as approved by the Community Development Department and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).

27. Landscape Plans. All landscaping plans shall be prepared in accordance with the City’s Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Such plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department, and the appropriate maintenance authority.

Archeology

28. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within the period specified by law (24 hours). Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

29. Non-Disclosure of Location Reburials. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 173

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
985 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).

30. Inadvertent Archeological Find. If during ground disturbance activities, unique cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Unique cultural resources are defined, for this condition only, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but may include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with the Native American Tribe(s). a. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of the find.
b. At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the tribal representative(s) and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources.
c. Grading of further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed. d. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the appropriate tribes. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Non- Disclosure of Reburial Condition.
e. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council.

31. Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of ground disturbing activities (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 174

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
986 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Menifee Community Development Department:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources.
ii. Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity.

Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. iii. If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a Riverside County curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees necessary for permanent curation.

Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City.

There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, items of Native American Cultural Patrimony, burial goods and Native American human remains. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report.

Paleontology

32. Inadvertent Paleontological Find. In the event that fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during construction, excavations within fifty (50) feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted. The contractor shall notify a qualified paleontologist to examine the discovery. The paleontologist shall document the discovery as needed in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The paleontologist shall notify the Community Development Department to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If in consultation with the paleontologist, the Project proponent determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the Project on the qualities that make the resource important. The plan shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval and the Project proponent shall implement the approval plan.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 175

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
987 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 33. Processing Fees. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Planning Division shall determine if any deposit-based fees for the project are in a negative balance. If so, any outstanding fees shall be paid by the applicant.

34. Development Impact Fees. The applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees including but not limited to Development Impact Fee (DIF), Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Quimby, Stephen’s Kangaroo Rat (KRAT), School Fees (Perris Union High School District, and Romoland School District), Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD), and Area Drainage Plan (ADP).

35. Mitigation Monitoring. The applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Director or review and approval demonstrating compliance with the standard conditions of approval and mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for this project which must be satisfied prior to issuance of grading permits. The Community Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to ensure such compliance.

36. Archeologist Retained. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the project applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeologist to monitor all ground disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. a. The Project Archaeologist and the Tribal monitor(s) shall manage and oversee monitoring for all initial ground disturbing activities and excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, mass or rough grading, trenching, stockpiling of materials, rock crushing, structure demolition and etc. The Project Archaeologist and the Tribal monitor(s), shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources in coordination with any required special interest or tribal monitors. b. The developer/permit holder shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract to the Community Development Department to ensure compliance with this condition of approval. Upon verification, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition.
c. In addition, the Project Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A consulting tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
d. Project grading and development scheduling;
i. The Project archeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The Training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the Project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 176

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
988 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. All new construction personnel that will conduct earthwork or grading activities that begin work on the Project following the initial Training must take the Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to beginning work and the Project archaeologist and Consulting Tribe(s) shall make themselves available
ii. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.

37. Native American Monitoring (Pechanga/Soboba). Tribal monitor(s) shall be required on-site during all ground-disturbing activities which are below the depths of the previous mass grading. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the Pechanga Band of Indians and Soboba band Luiseno Indians. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the above-mentioned Tribes and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Community Development Department and to the Engineering Department. The Native American Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground-disturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the Project Archaeologist.

The Developer shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are of Native American origin, found in the project area for proper treatment and disposition to a curational facility that meets or exceeds Federal Curation Standards outlined in 36 CFR 79. The applicant shall be responsible for all curation costs.

38. Paleontologist Required. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Applicant/Developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to create and implement a Paleontological Resource Mitigation Program (PRIMP). The project paleontologist would review the grading plan and conduct any pre-construction work necessary to render appropriate monitoring and mitigation requirements, to be documented in the PRIMP. The PRIMP would be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit. Information contained in the PRIMP would minimally include:

1. Description of the project site and proposed grading operations.

2. Description of the level of monitoring required for earth-moving activities.

3. Identification and qualifications of the paleontological monitor to be employed during earth moving.

4. Identification of personnel with authority to temporarily halt or divert grading to allow recovery of large specimens.

5. Direction for fossil discoveries to be reported to the developer and the City.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 177

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
989 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 6. Means and methods to be employed by the paleontological monitor to quickly salvage fossils to minimize construction delays.

7. Sampling methods for sediments that are likely to contain small fossil remains, if any.

8. Procedures and protocol for collecting and processing of samples and specimens, as necessary.

9. Fossil identification and curation procedures.

10.Identification of the repository to receive fossil material.

11.All pertinent maps and exhibits.

12.Procedures for reporting of findings.

13.Acknowledgment of the developer for content of the PRIMP and acceptance of financial responsibility for monitoring, reporting, and curation

39. Burrowing Owl Pre-Construction Survey. The Project Developer shall retain a qualified biologist to conduct a pre-construction survey for Burrowing Owl within 30 days prior to the start of construction. The results of the single one-day survey would be submitted to the City prior to obtaining a grading permit. If at any time there is a lapse of Project activities for 30 days or more, another burrowing owl survey shall be conducted and submitted to the City. If Burrowing Owl are not detected during the pre- construction survey, no further mitigation is required. If active burrowing owl burrows are detected during the breeding season, the on-site biologist will review and establish a conservative avoidance buffer surrounding the nest based on their best professional judgment and experience and verify compliance with this buffer and will verify the nesting effort has finished. Work can resume when no other active burrowing owl nesting efforts are observed. If active burrowing owl burrows are detected outside the breeding season, then passive and/or active relocation pursuant to a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be prepared by the Applicant and approved by the City in consultation with CDFW, or the Project Developer shall stop construction activities within the buffer zone established around the active nest and shall not resume construction activities until the nest is no longer active. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall be prepared in accordance with guidelines in the MSHCP. Burrowing owl burrows shall be excavated with hand tools by a qualified biologist when determined to be unoccupied and backfilled to ensure that animals do not reenter the holes/dens.

40. Nesting Bird Pre-Construction Survey. If construction occurs between February 1st and August 31st, a pre-construction clearance survey for nesting birds shall be conducted within three days of the start of any vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction. The biologist conducting the clearance survey shall document a negative survey with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities should stay outside of a no-disturbance buffer. The size of the no-disturbance buffer (generally 300 feet for migratory and non-migratory songbirds and 500 feet raptors and special-status species) will be determined by the wildlife biologist and will depend on the level of noise and/or surrounding anthropogenic disturbances, line of sight between the nest and the construction activity, type and duration of construction activity, ambient noise, species habituation, and topographical barriers. These factors will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when developing buffer distances. Limits of construction to Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 178

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
990 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 avoid an active nest will be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers; and construction personnel will be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas. A biological monitor should be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by the construction activity. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, construction activities within the buffer area can occur.

41. Stockpiling/Staging. During construction, best efforts shall be made to locate stockpiling and/or vehicle staging areas as far as practicable from existing residential dwellings.

PRIOR TO FINAL MAP

42. Processing Fees. Prior to approval of Final Map, the Planning Division shall determine if any deposit-based fees for the project are in a negative balance. If so, any outstanding fees shall be paid by the applicant.

43. Development Impact Fees. The applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees including but not limited to Development Impact Fee (DIF), Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Stephen’s Kangaroo Rat (KRAT), School Fees (Perris Union High School District, and Romoland School District), Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD), and Area Drainage Plan (ADP). T

44. Mitigation Monitoring. The applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Director or review and approval demonstrating compliance with the standard conditions of approval and mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for this project which must be satisfied prior to issuance of grading permits. The Community Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to ensure such compliance.

45. Final Map. After the approval of the TENTATIVE MAP and prior to the expiration of said map, the developer/owner shall cause the real property included within the TENTATIVE MAP, or any part thereof, to be surveyed and a FINAL MAP thereof prepared in accordance with the current Engineering Department requirements, the conditionally approved TENTATIVE MAP, and in accordance with Menifee Municipal Code Title 7 Subdivisions.

46. Surveyor. The FINAL MAP shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered civil engineer.

47. ECS. The developer/owner shall prepare an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) in accordance with Menifee Municipal Code Title 7 Subdivisions, which shall be submitted as part of the plan check review of the FINAL MAP.

48. Dark Sky Ordinance. The following Environmental Constraints Note shall be placed on the ECS:
"This property is subject to lighting restrictions as required by the Menifee Municipal Code Chapter 6.01, the “Dark Sky Ordinance”, which are intended to Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 179

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
991 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 reduce the effects of night lighting on the Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall be in conformance with the Dark Sky Ordinance.”

49. ECS Note EIR. The following Environmental Constraints Note shall be placed on the ECS:
“An EIR was prepared for this property by Kimley Horn and is on file at the City of Menifee Planning Division (State Clearinghouse No. 2022040622). The property is subject to environmental restrictions based on the results of the reports. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) was adopted with the EIR and should be referenced to determine project compliance prior to recordation of the final map.”

PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE

50. Processing Fees. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Community Development Department shall determine if the deposit-based fees for the project are in a negative balance. If so, any outstanding fees shall be paid by the applicant.

51. Development Impact Fees. The applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees including but not limited to Development Impact Fee (DIF), Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Quimby (Parks and Rec), Stephen’s Kangaroo Rat (KRAT), School Fees (Perris Union High School District, Menifee Union School District and Romoland School District), Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD), and Area Drainage Plan (ADP).

52. Mitigation Monitoring. The applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Director or review and approval demonstrating compliance with the standard conditions of approval and mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for this project which must be satisfied prior to issuance of grading permits. The Community Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to ensure such compliance.

53. No Building Permit Prior to Final Map. No building permit shall be issued until the Final Map described above has been recorded.

54. Lighting. Light fixtures shall be decorative and consistent with the City of Menifee Design Guidelines and included in the Building and Safety plans. Architecturally appropriate themed lighting fixtures shall be located along the project roads, project entrances, walkways, open space areas and other focal points on the project site and shall be subject to Community Development Department review and approval.

55. Roof-Mounted Equipment Plans. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, Community Development staff will verify that all roof mounted equipment will be screened in compliance with approved plans.

56. Electrical Cabinets. All electrical cabinets shall be located inside a room that is architecturally integrated into the design of the building.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 180

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
992 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 57. Screening of Accessory Structures. Screening of accessory structures (including mechanical equipment) shall be compatible in color and materials to primary structures.

58. Double Detectors. Double detector check valve assemblies (backflow preventers) for landscape irrigation and domestic water shall not be located at visually prominent locations (such as the end of drive aisles or at site entries) and shall be well-screened with shrubs, berming, or low screen walls.

59. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Guidelines. All plants, landscaping and foliage shall fall within current CPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) guidelines.

60. Break Areas. Outdoor employee break/lunch areas with seating, trash bins, shade and landscaping shall be provided near each office area of each building and located away from loading, storage and trash areas. The exact location and design shall be shown on the landscape and irrigation plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department prior to building permit issuance. An indoor break area can be substituted for an outdoor break area at the discretion of the Community Development Director if the indoor break area is determined to provide superior amenities or if it is determined that there is no acceptable location for an outdoor break area near the office area.

61. Security Systems. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall prepare a security plan for the site and submit to the Menifee Police Department for review and approval. The security plan for this project shall include a comprehensive security camera system that clearly depicts the entire parking field. This security camera system shall be 4k quality with High-Definition Resolution based in the building containing the management office for this development, or inside a security office or other place acceptable to the City of Menifee Police Department, that is accessible to law enforcement at all times of the day and night. The security camera system shall have a recording capacity to minimally save footage for a period of 30 days or as approved by the Police Department. While not required for all developments, the integration of Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) technology at vehicle entrance and exit points is strongly recommended. This technology serves as a powerful investigative tool for law enforcement agencies when investigating criminal activity. ALPR cameras are cameras specifically designed to read and record vehicle license plates as they enter and exit this complex. It should be noted that high quality day/night vision LPR cameras are relatively inexpensive. The plan shall be approved prior to issuance of Building Permits. The Police Department and/or Community Development Department shall verify that the security system has been installed prior to final occupancy.

In addition, the trash enclosure shall be properly secured and have a lock as well as a covering to keep unauthorized persons from entering the dumpster area.

62. Utilities Underground. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33 kV or greater, shall be installed underground. If the applicant provides to the Building and Safety Division and the Planning Division a definitive statement from the utility provider refusing to allow underground installation of the utilities they provide, this condition shall be null and void with respect to that utility.

Landscaping
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 181

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
993 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 63. Landscaping Submittals. Final landscape plan submittals are divided into two different processes. All on-site landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The on-site landscaping shall include any basins, streetscape, open space and planters on private property that is maintained by the property owner or private entity (HOA or Common Maintenance Entity/Association). All off-site landscaping plans shall be submitted to the Engineering and Public Works Department for review and approval. Off-site plans shall include landscaping in areas maintained by the Community Facilities District (CFD) and are located within the City of Menifee Right- of-Way which can include streetscape, basins or slopes.

64. Construction Plans. Prior to building permit issuance, the applicant shall submit the following construction plan applications to the Planning Division (pursuant to Menifee Municipal Code) for review and approval. The fee for each submittal will be determined by Resolution No. 24-1423 Cost of Services Fee Study and Planning Division Fee Schedule at the time of application submittal. Construction Plan Submittals include:

A. On-Site Landscaping – all Property Owner maintained landscaping and irrigation.

Performance Securities will be required prior to approval of this Landscape Construction Plan.

Additional submittal requirements can be found in the submittal checklist found on the Community Development Department’s website. All Landscape Construction Plans must be approved prior to the issuance of any building permit.

65. Landscape Inspections. Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the Applicant shall open a Landscape Deposit Based Fee case and deposit the prevailing deposit amount to cover the pre-installation inspections, installation inspections, Six Month Post Establishment and One Year Post Establishment Landscape Inspections.

66. Performance Securities (Bonds). Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development to guarantee the installation of plantings and irrigation system in accordance with the approved plan, shall be filed with the Department of Community Development. Securities may require review by City Attorney and City staff. The applicant holder is encouraged to allow adequate time to ensure that securities are in place. The performance security may be released one year after structural final, inspection report, and the One-Year Post Establishment report confirms that the planting and irrigation components have been adequately installed and maintained. A cash security shall be required when the estimated cost is $2,500.00 or less.

67. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees.

68. Interim Landscaping. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a condition so as to prevent a dust and/or blown sand nuisance and shall be either planted with Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 182

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
994 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 interim landscaping or provided with other wind and water erosion control measures as approved by the Community Development Department.

PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION .

69. Processing Fees. Prior to final inspection, the Planning Division shall determine if any fees for the project are in a negative balance. If so, any outstanding fees shall be paid by the applicant.

70. Development Impact Fees. The applicant shall pay all applicable development impact fees including but not limited to Development Impact Fee (DIF), Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Quimby (Parks and Rec), Stephen’s Kangaroo Rat (KRAT), School Fees (Perris Union High School District, Menifee Union School District and Romoland School District), Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD), and Area Drainage Plan (ADP).

71. Mitigation Monitoring. The applicant shall prepare and submit a written report to the Community Development Director or review and approval demonstrating compliance with the standard conditions of approval and mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for this project which must be satisfied prior to issuance of grading permits. The Community Development Director may require inspection or other monitoring to ensure such compliance

72. Archaeology Report – Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection of the first building permit associated with each phase of grading, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archaeologist to submit two copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the Project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department’s requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two copies shall be submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

73. Paleontological Monitoring Report. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department, an electronic copy of the Paleontology Monitoring Report in accordance with the procedures outlined in the PRIMP. The report shall be certified by a professional paleontologist listed on Riverside County’s Paleontology Consultant List. A deposit for the review of the report will be required.

74. Final Planning Inspection. The applicant shall obtain final occupancy sign-off from the Community Development Department for each building permit issued by scheduling a final Planning inspection prior to the final sign-off from the Building Department.

Planning staff shall verify that all pertinent conditions of approval have been met, including compliance with the approved elevations, site plan, parking lot layout, decorative paving, public plazas, etc. The applicant shall have all required paving, Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 183

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
995 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 parking, walls, site lighting, landscaping and automatic irrigation installed and in good condition.

Landscaping

75. Soil Management Plan. The applicant shall submit a Soil Management Plan (Report) to the Community Development Department before the Landscape Installation Inspection. The report can be sent in electronically. Information on the contents of the report can be found in the County of Riverside Guide to California Friendly Landscaping page 16, #7, “What is required in a Soil Management Plan?”

76. Landscape Inspections. The applicant shall obtain a final certificate of completion from the Planning Division’s Landscape Inspector for each building permit issued by scheduling a final landscape inspection prior to the final occupancy from the Planning Division.

77. Landscaping. All landscape planting and irrigation shall be installed and inspected in accordance with approved exhibits and Menifee Municipal Code.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 184

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
996 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Section II:

Engineering/Grading/Transportation
Conditions of Approval
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 185

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
997 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 PLOT PLAN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

STANDARD POLICIES & PROCEDURES

78. All required public improvements must be constructed and accepted by the City prior to issuance of the first and any subsequent certificate of occupancy, unless approved by City Engineer/Public Works Director. For “public improvements” related to this project, see Section E.

79. Any Engineering Design exceptions shown on the tentative map and associated engineering documents that are not specifically requested are not approved solely by virtue of inclusion on such documents. Engineering Design exceptions to City design standards and policies must be specifically requested in writing and approved by City Engineer/PW Director.

80. The developer is responsible to furnish & install one 2” and one 3” conduit for traffic signal interconnect and broadband purposes, per City of Menifee Standard Detail 1005, along all circulation element roads and intersections. Applicant may request wifi connection to be approved by the City Engineer / PW Director.

81.Subdivision Map Act – The developer / property owner shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and all other laws, ordinances, and regulations pertaining to the subdivision of land.

82.Engineering Plans / Mylars – All improvement plans and grading plans shall be drawn on twenty-four (24) inch by thirty-six (36) inch Mylar and signed by a licensed civil engineer and/or other registered/licensed professional as authorized by State law.

83.Guarantee for Required Improvements – Prior to grading permit issuance, construction permit issuance, financial security or bonds shall be provided to guarantee the construction of all required improvements within the public right-of-way and grading / water quality management facilities associated with each phase of construction, per the City’s municipal code.

84. If warranted as a result of the project improvements, the Public Works Director may require the dedication and construction of necessary utilities, streets, or other improvements outside the area of any particular map phase if the improvements are needed for circulation, drainage, parking, and access or for the welfare and safety of the public.

85.Bond Replacement, Reduction, and Releases – All requests for bond replacements (such as in changes of property ownerships), reductions (such as in partial completion of improvements), releases (such as in completion of improvements), shall conform to City policies, standards, and applicable City ordinances. It shall be the responsibility of the developer / property owner to notify the City in time when any of these bond changes are necessary. The City shall review all changes in Bond Agreements and the accompanying bonds or security.

86.Existing and Proposed Easements – The final grading plan and improvement plans, as applicable, shall correctly show all existing and proposed easements. Any omission or misrepresentation of these documents may require said plan to be resubmitted for further consideration.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 186

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
998 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 87.Plan Check Submittals – Appropriate plan check submittal forms shall be completed and submittal check list provided that includes required plan copies, necessary studies / reports, references, fees, deposits, etc. Prior to final approval of improvement plans by the Public Works / Engineering Department, the developer / property owner shall submit to the Public Works / Engineering Department CAD layers of all improvements to be maintained by the City (pavement, sidewalk, streetlights, etc.). A scanned image of all final approved grading and improvement plans on a Universal Serial Bus (USB) drive, also known as a “flash” drive or “thumb” drive, shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department, in one of the following formats: (a) Auto CAD DXF, (b) GIS shapefile (made up of ESRI extensions .shp, .shx and .dbf) or (c) Geodatabase (made up of ESRI extension .gdb). CAD files created with the latest version shall only be accepted if approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. GIS and ACAD files 2004 or later are required for all final maps upon approval.

88.Final Map Submittal Process – Appropriate final map plan check submittal forms shall be completed and appropriate fees or deposits paid. Prior to approval of the final map by the City Council, the developer / property owner shall provide along with the final map mylars, electronic files of the final map on Compact Disc (CD), in one of the following formats: (a) Auto CAD DXF, (b) GIS shapefile (made up of ESRI extensions .shp, .shx and .dbf) and (c) Geodatabase (made up of ESRI extension .gdb). CAD files created with the latest version shall only be accepted if approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.

89.Plan Approvals – Improvement plans and grading plans shall be submitted with necessary supporting documentation and technical studies (hydrology, hydraulics, traffic impact analysis, geotechnical studies, etc.) to the Public Works / Engineering Department for review and approval. All submittals shall be signed and date stamped by the Engineer of Record.

The plans must receive Public Works / Engineering Department approval prior to issuance of any applicable permit as determined by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. All submittals shall include a completed City Fee or Deposit Based Worksheet and the appropriate plan check. For improvements proposed to be owned and maintained by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, improvement plans must receive district approval prior to Building permit issuance or as determined by the District.

All required improvement plans and grading plans must be approved by the Public Works Engineering Department prior to issuance of any construction and/or grading permit, whichever comes first and as determined by the Public Works Director. Supporting City approved studies including, but not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic studies and traffic studies must be provided prior to approval of plans. All required Citywide Community Facilities District (CFD) landscape plans must be approved prior to building permit issuance.

90.As-Built Plans – Upon completion of all required improvements, the developer/property owner shall cause the civil engineer of record to prepare as-builts of all project plans, and submit project base line of work for all layers on a USB drive to the Public Works / Engineering Department, in one of the following formats: (a) Auto CAD DXF, (b) GIS shapefile (made up of ESRI extensions .shp, .shx and .dbf) or (c) Geodatabase (made up of ESRI extension .gdb). The timing for submitting the as-built plans shall be as determined by the Public Works Director / City Engineer, and prior to Acceptance of improvements and Performance security/bond release.

91.Construction Times of Operation – The developer / property owner shall monitor, supervise, and control all construction and construction related activities to prevent them from causing a public nuisance including, but not limited to, strict adherence to the following:

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 187

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
999 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 a. Construction activities shall comply with City of Menifee ordinances relating to construction noise. Any construction within the City limits located 1/4 of a mile from an occupied residence shall be permitted Monday through Saturday, except on nationally recognized holidays, 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. in accordance with Municipal Code Section

8.01.020. There shall be no construction permitted on Sunday or nationally recognized holidays unless prior approval is obtained from the City Building Official or City Engineer.
b. Removal of spoils, debris, or other construction materials deposited on any public street no later than the end of each working day.
c. The construction site shall accommodate the parking of all motor vehicles used by persons working at or providing deliveries to the site. Violation of any condition or restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions shall subject the owner, applicant to remedies as set forth in the City Municipal Code. In addition, the Public Works Director / City Engineer or the Building Official may suspend all construction related activities for violation of any condition, restriction or prohibition set forth in these conditions until such a time it has been determined that all operations and activities are in conformance with these conditions.
d. A Pre-Construction meeting is mandatory with the City’s Public Works Inspection team prior to permit issuance and the start of any construction activities for this site.

92.Dry Utility Installations – Electrical power, telephone, communication, traffic signal, street lighting, and cable television conduits and lines shall be placed underground in accordance with current City Ordinances 460 and 461, and as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. This applies also to existing overhead lines which are 33.6 kilovolts or below along the project frontage and within the project boundaries. In cases where 33.6kV or below lines are collocated with high voltage lines (for example, 115kV), the low voltage lines shall be placed underground even when the high voltage lines are exempt from relocation or undergrounding in accordance with City standards and ordinances. Exemption from undergrounding low voltage lines shall only be by the Public Works Director / City Engineer or as directed by the City Council.

93. All grading activities shall conform to the latest adopted edition of the California Building Code, City Grading Ordinance, Chapter 8.26, applicable City design standards and specifications, City ordinances, policies, rules and regulations governing grading in the City.

94.Regulations and Ordinance on Grading Within the City – In addition to compliance with City Chapter 8.26, grading activities shall also conform to the latest edition of the California Building Code, City General Plan, other City Ordinances, City design standards and specifications and all other relevant laws, rules and regulations governing grading in the City of Menifee. Prior to commencing any grading, clearing, grubbing or any topsoil disturbances, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the Public Works / Engineering Department.

Grading activities that are exempt from a grading permit as outlined by the City ordinance may still require a grading permit by the Public Works Director / City Engineer when deemed necessary to prevent the potential for adverse impacts upon drainage, sensitive environmental features, or to protect property, health safety, and welfare.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 188

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1000 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 95.Dust Control – All necessary measures to control dust shall be implemented by the developer during grading. Fugitive dust shall be controlled in accordance with Rule 403 of the California Air Quality Control Board.

96.2:1 Maximum Slope – Graded slopes shall be limited to a maximum steepness ratio of 2:1 (horizontal to vertical) unless otherwise approved by the Public Works / Engineering Department.

97.Slope Setbacks – Observe slope setbacks from buildings and property lines per the California Building Code and City ordinance on grading.

98.Slope Landscaping and Irrigation – All slopes greater than or equal to 3 feet in vertical height shall be irrigated and landscaped with grass or ground cover. All manufactured slopes shall be irrigated and landscaped with grass or approved ground cover, and shall have some type of drainage swale at the toe of the slope to collect runoff. Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical height shall be irrigated and planted with shrubs and/or trees per City Grading Ordinance Chapter 8.26. Drip irrigation shall be used for all irrigated slopes.

99.Slope Erosion Control Plan - Erosion control and/or landscape plans are required for manufactured slopes greater than 3 feet in vertical height. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed landscape architect and bonded per applicable City ordinances. 100.Slope Stability Report – A slope stability report shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for all proposed cut and fill slopes steeper than 2:1 (horizontal:vertical) or over 20 feet in vertical height, unless addressed in a previously city approved report.
101.Erosion Control Plans – All grading plans shall require erosion control plans prior to approval. Temporary erosion control measures shall be implemented immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facilities. Plans showing erosion control measures may be included as part of the grading plans or submitted as a separate set of plans for city review and approval. Graded but undeveloped land shall provide, in addition to erosion control planting, any drainage facilities deemed necessary to control or prevent erosion. Erosion and sediment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) are required year-round in compliance with all applicable City of Menifee Standards and Ordinances and the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit from the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). Additional Erosion protection may be required during the rainy season.
102.Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) – All grading plans shall require an approved copy of the Water Quality Management Plan sheet per the approved WQMP, executed report. The developer / property owner shall comply with the requirements of the WQMP report, the NPDES municipal permit in force, and City standards and specifications. 103.Design Grade Criteria – Onsite parking areas shall be designed in accordance with the current version of City of Menifee Standards and Specifications. Non-compliance may require a redesign of the project. Significant redesigns may require a revised Plot Plan. The following design grade criteria shall be followed:

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 189

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1001 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 a. On-Site Parking – Where onsite parking is designed, such as in common areas, parking stalls and driveways shall not have grade breaks exceeding 4%. A 50’ minimum vertical curve shall be provided where grade breaks exceed 4%. Five percent grade is the maximum slope for any parking area. Where Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements apply, the ADA requirement shall prevail. b. Down Drains - Concrete down drains that outlet onto parking lot areas are not allowed.

Drainage that has been collected in concrete ditches or swales should be collected into receiving underground drainage system, or should outlet with acceptable velocity reducers into BMP devises.
c. Pavement - Permeable pavement requires the layers of filter material to be installed relatively flat. As such, the permeable pavement areas should have a maximum surface gradient of 2%,or approved by the Public Works Director/City Engineer. 104.Drainage Grade – Minimum drainage design grade shall be 1.5% except on Portland cement concrete surfaces, where 0.50% shall be the minimum for concentrated flow conveyance (for example, ribbon gutters ). The engineer of record must submit a variance request for design grades less than 1% with a justification for a lesser grade. 105.Finish Grade – Shall be sloped to provide proper drainage away from all exterior foundation walls in accordance with City of Menifee Standard Plan 300. 106.Use of Maximum and Minimum ADA Grade Criteria – Actual field construction grades shall not exceed the minimum and maximum grades for ADA and approved project grading design, to allow for construction tolerances. Any improvement that is out of the minimum and maximum values will not be accepted by the City Inspector and will need to be removed and replaced at developer’s or owner’s expense.
107.Licensed Geotechnical Engineer – A California licensed Geotechnical Engineer shall perform final determination of the foundation characteristics of soils within on-site development areas, and per the approved geotechnical report reviewed and approved by the City.
108.Retaining Walls – Sections, which propose retaining walls, will require separate permits.

They shall be obtained prior to issuance of any other building permits – unless otherwise approved by the Building Official and/or the Public Works Director / City Engineer. The walls shall be designed by a licensed civil engineer and conform to City Standards. The plans shall include plan and profiles sheets.
109.Trash Racks – Trash Racks shall be installed at all inlet structures that collect runoff from open areas with potential for large, floatable debris.
110.Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFCWCD) Encroachment Permit Required – An Encroachment Permit Is required for any work within District right of way or any connection to District facilities. The Encroachment Permit application shall be processed and approved concurrently with the improvement plans. 111.RCFCWCD Submittal of Plans – A copy of the project specific WQMP, improvement plans, grading plans, BMP improvement plans and any other necessary documentation along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations (drainage report) shall be submitted to Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 190

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1002 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 the District as reference material for the review and approval of the final drainage report and storm drain plans that propose construction of storm drain facilities that will be owned and maintained by the District.
112.Grading Permit for Clearing and Grubbing – City ordinance on grading requires a grading permit prior to clearing, grubbing, or any topsoil disturbances related to construction grading activities.
113.Compliance with NPDES General Construction Permit – The developer/property owner shall comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit (GCP) from the State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB).

This is in addition to the Municipal permit governing design, WQMPs, and permanent BMPs.

Prior to approval of the grading plans or issuance of any grading permit, the developer/property owner shall obtain a GCP from the SWRCB. Proof of filing a Notice of Intent (NOI) and monitoring plan, shall be submitted to the City; and the WDID number issued by the SWRCB shall be reflected on all grading plans prior to approval of the plans. For additional information on how to obtain a GCP, contact the SWRCB. 114.SWPPP – Prior to approval of the grading plans, the developer/property owner shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the development. The developer/property owner shall be responsible for uploading the SWPPP into the State’s SMARTS database system and shall ensure that the SWPPP is updated to constantly reflect the actual construction status of the site. A copy of the SWPPP shall be made available at the construction site at all times until construction is completed. The SWRCB considers a construction project complete once a Notice of Termination (NOT) has been issued by SWRCB. The City will require submittal of NOTs for requests to fully release associated grading bonds.
115.SWPPP for Inactive Sites – The developer/property owner shall be responsible for ensuring that any graded area that is left inactive for a long period of time has appropriate SWPPP BMPs in place and in good working conditions at all times until construction is completed and the Regional Board has issued a Notice of Termination (NOT) for the development.
116.Import/Export – In instances where a grading plan involves import or export, prior to obtaining a grading permit, the developer/property owner shall have obtained approval for the import/export location from the Public Works / Engineering Department. If an Environmental Assessment did not previously approve either location, a Grading Environmental Assessment shall be submitted to the Planning Director for review and comment and to the Public Works Director / City Engineer for approval. Additionally, if the movement of import/export occurs using City roads, review, and approval of the haul routes by the Public Works / Engineering Department will be required. Import or export materials shall conform to the requirements of Chapter 8.26.
117.Offsite Grading Easements – Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer/property owner shall obtain all required easements and/or permissions to perform offsite grading, from affected land owners. Notarized and recorded agreement or documents authorizing the offsite grading shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Department.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 191

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1003 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 118.Offsite Property and Right of Way – The developer / property owner shall be responsible for acquiring any offsite real property interests that may be required in connection with the development project. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall obtain all required ROW, easements and / or permissions to perform offsite grading, from all affected landowners.
119.Increased Runoff Criteria – The development of this site would increase peak flow rates on downstream properties. Mitigation shall be required to offset such impacts..

A complete drainage study including, but not limited to, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations for the proposed detention basin shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.

Where possible and feasible the onsite flows should be mitigated before combining with offsite flows to minimize the size of the detention facility required.

No outlet pipe(s) will be less than 18" in diameter. Where necessary an orifice plate may be used to restrict outflow rates. Appropriate trash racks shall be provided for all outlets less than 48" in diameter.

The outlet structure(s) must be capable of passing the 100-year storm without damage to the facility.

A viable maintenance mechanism, acceptable to the City should be provided for any flood control facilities to be owned and maintained by the City. Any facilities proposed to be owned by the District, should be provided with a viable maintenance mechanism acceptable to the City and the District. For the City this would be the citywide CFD. Facilities to remain private shall be maintained by commercial property owners association or homeowners associations.
120.Site Drainage – Positive drainage of the site shall be provided, and water shall not be allowed to pond behind or flow over cut and fill slopes. Where water is collected and discharged in a common area, protection of the native soils shall be provided by planting erosion resistant vegetation, as the native soils are susceptible to erosion by running water.

All cut and fill slopes shall have a maximum 2:1 (H:V) grade, 2 horizontal to 1 vertical. 121.Alteration of Drainage Patterns – Prior to grading permit issuance or approval of improvement plans, the final engineering plans submitted by the applicant shall address the following: The project drainage system shall be designed to accept and properly convey all on- and off-site drainage flowing on or through the site. The project drainage system design shall protect downstream properties from any damage caused by alteration of drainage patterns such as concentration or diversion of flow. Concentrated drainage on commercial lots shall be diverted through parkway drains under sidewalks. 122.100 Year Storm – The 100-year storm flow shall be contained within the street top of curb. 123.100 Year Drainage Facilities – All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate 100-year storm flows as approved by the City of Menifee Public Works / Engineering Department.
124.100 Year Design Criteria – In final engineering and prior to grading permit issuance, subsurface storage systems shall be designed with emergency overflow inlets to mitigate Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 192

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1004 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 flows in excess of the 100-year storm event in a controlled manner to the satisfaction of the Public Works / Engineering Department.
125.100 Year Sump Outlet – Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions shall be designed to convey the tributary 100-year storm flows. Additional emergency escape shall also be provided.
126.Coordinate Drainage Design – Development of this property shall be coordinated with the development of adjacent properties to ensure that watercourses remain unobstructed, and stormwaters are not diverted from one watershed to another. This may require the construction of temporary drainage facilities or offsite construction and grading. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage easement shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for review.
127.Interceptor Drain Criteria/Guidelines – The criteria for public maintenance access of terrace/interceptor is as follows: flows between 1-5 cfs shall have a 5-foot wide access road, flows between 6-10 cfs shall be a minimum 6-foot rectangular channel. Terrace/interceptor drains are unacceptable for flows greater than 10 cfs. Flows greater than 10 cfs shall be brought to the street. These guidelines may be modified by the City Engineer/Public Works Director. This condition shall not apply to privately maintained facilities. 128.BMP – Energy Dissipators: Energy Dissipators, such as rip-rap, shall be installed at the outlet of a storm drain system that discharges runoff flows into a natural channel or an unmaintained facility. The dissipators shall be designed to minimize the amount of erosion downstream of the storm drain outlet.
129.Trash Racks – Trash Racks shall be installed at all inlet structures that collect runoff from open areas with potential for large, floatable debris.
130.Perpetuate Drainage Patterns – The property's street and lot grading shall be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage areas, outlet points and outlet conditions. Otherwise, a drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage easement shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.
131.Perpetual Drainage Patterns – Grading shall be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns and conditions with respect to tributary drainage areas and outlet points. Where these conditions are not preserved, necessary drainage easements shall be obtained from all affected property owners for the release onto their properties of concentrated or diverted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage easement shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for review. 132.Protection of Downstream Properties – The developer/property owner shall protect downstream properties from damages that can be caused by alteration of natural drainage patterns, i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and securing necessary drainage easements.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 193

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1005 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 133.Drainage Runoff Emergency Escape – An emergency escape path shall be provided for the stormwater runoff at all inlets for the proposed underground facilities in the event that the inlets become blocked in any way. To prevent flood damage to the proposed structures, all proposed structures in the vicinity of the inlets and along the emergency escape path shall be protected from flooding by either properly elevating the finished floor in relation to the inlets and flow path or by making sure the structures are set back from the inlets to provide adequate flow through area in the event the emergency escape of the stormwater runoff is necessary.
134.Storm Drain Lines 36” and larger – All proposed storm drain lines greater than 36" in diameter may be considered for ownership and maintenance by the Flood Control District.

The applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement with the Flood Control District regarding the terms of the design, construction and operation of facilities proposed for ownership by the Flood Control District.
135.No Building Permit without Legal Lot – Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer / property owner shall ensure that the underlying parcels for such buildings are complying with City Ordinances, Codes, and the Subdivision Map Act. 136.No Building Permit Prior to Parcel Map Recordation – Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer / property owner shall record the parcel map. 137.No Building Permit without Grading Permit – Prior to issuance of any building permit for any new structure or appurtenance, the developer/property owner shall obtain a grading permit and/or approval to construct from the Public Works Engineering Department. 138.Final Rough Grading Conditions – Prior to issuance of each building permit, the developer/property owner shall cause the Civil Engineer of Record and Soils Engineer of Record for the approved grading plans, to submit signed and wet stamped rough grade certification and compaction test reports with 90% or better compaction. The certifications shall use City approved forms and shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Department for verification and acceptance.
139.Conformance to Elevations/Geotechnical Compaction – Rough grade elevations for all building pads and structure pads submitted for grading plan check approval shall be in substantial conformance with the elevations shown on approved grading plans. Compaction test certification shall be in compliance with the approved project geotechnical/soils report.

140.Final Grade Certification – The developer/property owner shall cause the Civil Engineer of Record for approved grading plans, to submit signed and wet stamped final grade certification on City-approved form, for each building requesting a certificate of occupancy.

The certification shall be submitted to the Public Works Engineering Department for verification and acceptance.
141.Conform to Elevations – Final grade elevations of all building or structure finish floors submitted for grading plan check approval shall be in substantial conformance with the elevations shown on the approved grading plans. Compaction test certification shall be in compliance with the approved project geotechnical/soils report. 142.Plant & Irrigate Slopes – All manufactured slopes shall be irrigated and landscaped with grass or approved ground cover and shall have some type of drainage swale at the toe of Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 194

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1006 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 the slope to collect runoff. Slopes greater than or equal to 3’ in vertical height shall have erosion control measures provided. Slopes that exceed 15’ in vertical height are to be planted with additional shrubs and trees as approved by the Public Works / Engineering Department.

Drip irrigation shall be provided for all irrigated slopes. 143.Street Design Standards – Street improvements shall conform to all applicable City Design Standards and Specifications, the City General Plan, Ordinances, and all other relevant laws, rules and regulations governing street construction in the City. 144.Concrete Work – All concrete work including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, cross gutters, catch basins, manholes, vaults, etc. shall be constructed to meet a 28-day minimum concrete strength of 3,250 psi.
145.Intersection Geometrics – All final intersection geometrics may be modified in final engineering as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. 146.Intersection / 50-Foot Tangent – All centerline intersections shall be at ninety (90) degrees, plus or minus five (5) degrees, with a minimum fifty (50) foot tangent for local roads and one hundred (100) foot tangent, measured from flow line / curb face or as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.
147.ADA Compliance – ADA path of travel shall be designed at the most convenient accesses.
148.Public Streetlights Service Points – All proposed public streetlights shall be provided with necessary appurtenances and service points for power, separate from privately owned streetlights. The developer/property owner shall coordinate with the PW Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to streetlight service points. Service points for proposed public streetlights shall become public and shall be located within public right of way or within duly dedicated public easements. 149.CFD Maintenance – The property owner shall file for annexation or inclusion into the CFD for street sweeping services, street pavement maintenance, landscaping, street lighting, etc. 150.Offsite Grading – A notarized and recorded agreement, or City-approved documents authorizing the offsite grading shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department.
151.Street Name Sign – The developer/property owner shall install street name sign(s) in accordance with applicable City Standards, or as directed by the Public Works / Engineering Department.
152.Traffic Signal Control Devices – All new traffic signals and traffic signal modifications required for construction by this development project shall include traffic signal communication infrastructure, network equipment, and Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) license software. Said traffic signal control devices shall be submitted with the traffic signal design plans and shall be approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer, prior to testing of a new traffic signal. Traffic signal poles shall be placed at the ultimate locations when appropriate.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 195

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1007 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 153.Cost participation through Payment of TUMF and DIF for Improvements – The developer/property owner’s TUMF and DIF payment obligations shall be considered as cost participation for Project’s required offsite improvements only when the offsite improvements for which credits are claimed, are eligible TUMF and/or DIF facilities at time of TUMF and DIF payments. Determination for TUMF credits shall be at the discretion of the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG), the governing authority, which shall include entering a three party TUMF Credit Agreement with the developer, WRCOG and the City of Menifee. Developer shall be eligible, and may apply, for DIF fee credits and reimbursements for facilities that it will construct which are within the DIF program, including entering into a DIF Credit and Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Menifee. 154.Improvement Bonds – Prior to improvement plan approval and issuance of any construction permit for all required onsite and offsite public improvements, the developer/project owner shall enter into a bond agreement and post acceptable bonds or security, to guarantee the completion of all required improvements. The bonds shall be in accordance with all applicable City ordinances, resolutions, and municipal codes. 155.Encroachment Permits – The developer/property owner shall obtain all required encroachment permits and clearances prior to start of any work within City, State, or local agency right-of-way.
156.Annexation to the CFD (CFD 2017-1) –The developer/property owner shall complete the annexation of the proposed development into the boundaries of the City of Menifee CFD.

The CFD shall be responsible for the following:
•The maintenance of public improvements or facilities that benefit this development, including but not limited to, public landscaping, streetlights, traffic signals, streets, pavement maintenance, , street sweeping, , graffiti abatement, and other public improvements or facilities as approved by the Public Works Director.

The developer/property owner shall be responsible for all costs associated with the annexation of the proposed development in the CFD.
157.Assessment Segregation – Should this project lie within any assessment/benefit district, the applicant shall, prior to any building permit issuance, make application for and pay for their reapportionment of the assessments or pay the unit fees in the benefit district. 158.Landscape Improvement Plans for CFD Maintenance – Landscape improvements within public ROW and/or areas dedicated to the City for the citywide CFD to maintain shall be prepared on separate City CFD plans for review and approval by the Public Works / Engineering Department. The plans may be prepared as one plan for the entire development as determined by the PW Director. When necessary, as determined by the PW Director, a separate WQMP construction plan on City title block maybe required for review and approval by the Public Works / Engineering Department prior to issuance of a grading permit. 159.Parkway Landscaping Design Standards – The parkway areas behind the street curb within the public’s right-of-way shall be landscaped and irrigated per City standards and guidelines.
160.CFD Landscape Guidelines and Improvement Plans – All landscape improvements for maintenance by the CFD shall be designed and installed in accordance with City CFD Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 196

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1008 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Landscape Guidelines, and shall be drawn on a separate improvement plan on City title block. The landscape improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works / Engineering Department prior to issuance of a construction permit. 161. Maintenance of CFD Accepted Facilities – All landscaping and appurtenant facilities to be maintained by the citywide CFD shall be built to City standards. The developer shall be responsible for ensuring that landscaping areas to be maintained by the CFD have its own controller and meter system, separate from any private controller/meter system.

PROJECT-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
A. GRADING
Prior to Grading Permit Issuance:
162. The following geotechnical report and related documentation was reviewed and conditionally approved by the City:

a.Response to Review Comment, prepared by GeoTek, Inc., dated March 17, 2022. b.Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation For Proposed Warehouse Project, APN’s 330-190-002, -003, -004, -005, -010, -011, and -012, Kuffel Road and Wheat Street, Menifee, Riverside County, California, Project No. 2761-CR, prepared by GeoTek, Inc., dated June 14, 2021.
163. A final geotechnical report or supplemental report shall be prepared and submitted during final engineering. This final or supplemental report shall define the specific traffic loading information that is applicable to this project and establish a final pavement design that is based on this traffic loading information. Under no circumstances shall the final pavement design be less than the City standards. The final geotechnical report or supplemental report must be reviewed and approved by the Public Works / Engineering Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
164. Two copies of the City-approved final geotechnical / supplemental report and related documentation shall be provided to the Public Works / Engineering Department with the initial submittal of a grading plan. The developer / property owner shall comply with the recommendations of the final geotechnical / supplemental report and City standards and specifications. All grading shall be performed in accordance with the recommendations of the final geotechnical / supplemental report, and under the general direction of a licensed geotechnical engineer.
165.Grading Bonds – Prior to commencing any grading of 50 or more cubic yards of dirt, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the Public Works / Engineering Department. Prior to issuance of the permit, adequate performance grading security shall be posted by the developer / property owner with the Public Works / Engineering Department. 166.Import / export – In instances where a grading plan involves import or export, prior to obtaining a grading permit, the developer / property owner shall have obtained approval for the import / export location from the Public Works / Engineering Department. The proposed import / export shall conform with City standards and ordinances, including environmental requirements, and submitted to the Public Works Director / City Engineer for approval.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 197

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1009 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Additionally, if the movement of import / export occurs using City roads, review and approval of the haul routes by the Public Works / Engineering Department will be required. Import or export materials shall conform with City standards and ordinances. 167.Offsite Grading – Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, it shall be the sole responsibility of the developer / property owner to obtain all proposed or required easements and / or permissions necessary to perform offsite grading, from affected landowners; including any off-site grading to construct the necessary transitions. Notarized and recorded agreement or documents authorizing the offsite grading shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department.

Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
168.Submit Plans – A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans, BMP improvement plans, and any other necessary documentation along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for review. All submittals shall be date stamped by the engineer and include a completed City Deposit or Fee Based Worksheet and the appropriate plan check fee or deposit. 169.No Building Permit Without Legal Lot – Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer / property owner shall ensure that the underlying parcels for such buildings are complying with City Ordinances, Codes, and the Subdivision Map Act. 170.Parcel Map – The proposed development includes eight (8) parcels. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the developer / project owner shall consolidate these parcels into a parcel map. The parcel map shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for review and approval prior to recordation. (See also the Tentative Parcel Map conditions of approval for this project.)
171.No Building Permit without Grading Permit - Prior to issuance of any building permit for any new structures or appurtenances, the developer / property owner shall obtain a grading permit and / or approval to construct from the Public Works / Engineering Department.
172.Final Rough Grading Conditions – Prior to issuance of a building permit for any new structures or appurtenances, the developer / property owner shall cause the Civil Engineer of Record and Soils Engineer of Record for the approved grading plans, to submit signed and wet stamped rough grade certification and compaction test reports with 90% or better compaction, for the lots for which building permits are requested. The certifications shall use City approved forms, and shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for verification and acceptance.
173.Conformance to Elevations / Geotechnical Compaction - Rough grade elevations for all building pads and structure pads submitted for grading plan check approval shall be in substantial conformance with the elevations shown on approved grading plans. Compaction test certification shall be in compliance with the approved project geotechnical/soils report.

Prior to Issuance of Any Certificate of Occupancy:
174.Final Grade Certification – The developer / property owner shall cause the Civil Engineer of Record for the approved grading plans, to submit a signed and wet-stamped final grade Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 198

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1010 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 certification, on City approved form, for each building for which a certificate of occupancy is requested. The certification shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for verification and acceptance.
175.Conform to Elevations - Final grade elevations of all building or structure finish floors submitted for grading plan check approval shall be in substantial conformance with the elevations shown on the approved grading plans.
176.Plant & Irrigate Slopes – All manufactured slopes shall be irrigated and landscaped with grass or approved ground cover, and shall have some type of drainage swale at the toe of the slope to collect runoff. Slopes greater than or equal to 3’ in vertical height shall have erosion control measures provided. Slopes that exceed 15’ in vertical height are to be planted with additional shrubs and trees as approved by the Public Works / Engineering Department.

Drip irrigation shall be provided for all irrigated slopes.

B. DRAINAGE
177.Drainage Study – The following preliminary drainage study was reviewed and approved by the City:
a.Preliminary Drainage Study, prepared by Albert A. Webb Associates, dated October 2021.

Two copies of a final drainage study shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.

The study shall analyze, at a minimum, the following:
•Project site drainage flow.
•All future improvements drainage flow.
•Q 10, Q100, pre- and post- condition flow rates.
•Anticipated total drainage flow into existing storm drain and existing storm drain capacity.
•Total drainage flow into and capacity of proposed storm drain and water quality management facilities / BMPs.

The final drainage study shall also be consistent with the approved final water quality management plan (FINAL WQMP).

The project shall comply with all mitigation recommended by the approved drainage study.

A fee for review of the Drainage Study shall be paid to the City, the amount of which shall be determined by City at first submittal of report.
178.Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fees - The proposed development is located within the bounds of the Homeland / Romoland ADP of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Flood Control District), for which drainage fees have been established by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors. Applicable ADP fees will be due (in accordance with the Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area Drainage Plans) prior to building permits for this project. The fee due will be based on the fee in effect at the time of payment.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 199

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1011 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 179.Master Drainage Plan (MDP) – The proposed development is located within the bounds of the Homeland / Romoland MDP of the Flood Control District. 180.Proposed Drainage Concept - The project will generate onsite and offsite drainage flows.

Onsite drainage will flow northerly from the southern boundary of the site to a bioretention / water quality basin at the northern boundary of the site by means of concrete ribbon gutters and a network of onsite storm drain pipe. Offsite drainage from the south will be collected by concrete v-gutters along the retaining wall near the southern boundary of the site and then redirected on both sides of the site to the proposed curb and gutter along Wheat Street and Byers Road.

Stormwater runoff from the street improvements along Wheat Street (centerline to the proposed eastern right of way) will enter a proposed catch basin located at the southeast corner of intersection of Wheat Street and Kuffel Road. Similarly, stormwater from the street improvements along Byers (centerline to the proposed western right of way) will enter a proposed catch basin located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Byers Road and Kuffel Road. Runoff from the south half of the street improvements along Kuffel Road (centerline to the proposed southern right of way) between Wheat Street and Byers Road will also be intercepted by proposed catch basins. Proposed water quality facilities will treat low flows prior to each catch basin, with high flows and treated low flows entering a proposed off- site storm drain lines that all gravity flow to Romoland MDP Line A-14a in Byers Road of the Homeland / Romoland MDP and then discharge directly into the Line A channel of the Homeland / Romoland MDP before discharging to the San Jacinto River.

Drainage from additional impervious area that results from the offsite street improvements will have to be treated and conveyed in accordance with City ordinances and codes and State regulations.
181.Completion of Drainage Improvements - All onsite and offsite water quality / drainage systems must be constructed and operational prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy.
182.10 Year Curb – 100 Year Right-of-Way - The 10-year storm flow shall be contained within the top of curb, and the 100-year storm flow shall be contained within the street right-of-way.

When either of these criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities shall be installed. The property shall be graded to drain to the adjacent street or an adequate outlet. 183.100 Year Drainage Facilities - All drainage facilities shall be designed to accommodate 100-year storm flows as approved by the City of Menifee Public Works / Engineering Department.
184.100 Year Design Criteria - In final engineering and prior to grading permit issuance, subsurface drainage/BMP facilities shall be designed with emergency overflow inlets to mitigate flows in excess of the 100-year storm event in a controlled manner to the satisfaction of the Public Works / Engineering Department.
185.100 Year Sump Outlet - Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions shall be designed to convey the tributary 100-year storm flows. Additional emergency escape shall also be provided.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 200

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1012 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 186.On-Site Storm Drain System - Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the proposed on- site storm drain system shall be designed such that any ponding in the 100-year storm, shall be contained within the site; it shall not encroach onto any adjacent property, and shall maintain a minimum 1-foot freeboard to the proposed building pad elevation. The 100-year storm flow from the site shall not flow over the proposed parkway or within the driveway approach.

C. LANDSCAPING
187.Maintenance of Landscaping – All private landscaping shall be maintained by the individual property owner, or as otherwise established by Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). All landscaping, and similar improvements not properly maintained by the individual property owner must be annexed into a CFD, or other mechanism as determined by the City of Menifee.

D. STREETS AND DEDICATIONS
188.Street Improvements – Street improvements shall conform to all applicable City Design Standards and Specifications, the City General Plan, and all other relevant laws, rules and regulations governing street construction in the City. The development includes improvements to Wheat Street, Byers Road, and Kuffel Road along the project frontage.

Turning movements at driveways will be as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. The developer / property owner shall obtain all right-of-way necessary to accommodate the required improvements.
a. Wheat Street – Wheat Street shall be improved along the project frontage to an Industrial Collector (2-lane) designation with an ultimate half-width right-of-way of 39 feet, a paved curb-to-centerline width of 28 feet, and an 11-foot landscaped parkway that includes a 6-foot sidewalk. The improvements shall include the necessary offsite transitions to the existing pavement width, as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall construct or guarantee the construction of the public street improvements fronting the property to the centerline plus an additional 12 feet past the centerline, including the necessary offsite transitions, as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. The design of the street improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. If needed, it shall be the sole responsibility of the developer / property owner to obtain all proposed or required easements and / or permissions necessary to perform offsite grading, from affected landowners where necessary to construct the street improvements.

Notarized and recorded agreement or documents authorizing the offsite grading shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department. b. Byers Road – Byers Road shall be improved along the project frontage to an Industrial Collector (2-lane) designation with an ultimate half-width right-of-way of 39 feet, a paved curb-to-centerline width of 28 feet, and an 11-foot landscaped parkway that includes a 6-foot sidewalk. The improvements shall include the necessary offsite transitions to the existing pavement width, as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. Class III Community On-Street bike lanes shall also be provided. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer shall construct or guarantee the construction of the public street improvements fronting the property to the centerline plus an additional 12 feet past the median or Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 201

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1013 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 centerline, including the necessary offsite transitions, as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. The design of the street improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. If needed, it shall be the sole responsibility of the developer / property owner to obtain all proposed or required easements and / or permissions necessary to perform offsite grading, from affected landowners where necessary to construct the street improvements.

Notarized and recorded agreement or documents authorizing the offsite grading shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department. c. Kuffel Road Dedication - The developer / property owner shall construct or guarantee the construction of Kuffel Road fronting the development to the General Local (2 lane) designation with an ultimate half-width Right of Way of 30 feet, 20 feet curb-to-centerline paved width, and a 10-foot landscaped parkway that includes a 6-foot sidewalk. If additional right of way is needed, the developer / property owner shall dedicate the necessary right of way fronting the development. 189.Soils and Pavement Report - Street pavement structural designs shall comply with the recommendations in the City-approved project geotechnical report, and must meet minimum City standards and specifications, as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.

The preliminary pavement design shown on the plans shall be based on R-Value testing of representative soils. The final pavement design shall be performed following grading and be based on R-Value testing of subgrade soils at locations approved by the City’s Public Works Inspector, and the approved Traffic Index (T.I.).
190.Driveways - Final driveway geometrics may be modified in final engineering as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. Driveways shall meet current standard radii on all existing and proposed commercial drive approaches used as access to the proposed development. The developer shall adhere to all City standards and regulations for access and ADA guidelines. As outlined in the following conditions, medians may be required to restrict turning movements for public safety purposes as determined by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.
191.Acceptance of Public Roadway Dedication and Improvements – Easements and right- of way for public roadways shall be granted to the City through an acceptable recordable instrument. The easements shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for review and approval prior to recordation.
192.ADA Compliance – ADA path of travel shall be designed at the most convenient accesses and the shortest distance to the buildings in accordance with ADA design standards and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director / City Engineer and the City Building Official. 193.Paving or Paving Repairs – The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining the paving inspections required by City standards and ordinances. Paving and / or paving repairs for utility street cuts shall be per City of Menifee standards and ordinances and as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.
194.Signing and Striping – A signing and striping plan for Wheat Street and Byers Road is required for this project. The applicant shall be responsible for any additional paving and / or striping removal caused by the striping plan.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 202

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1014 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 195.Street Light Plan – Street lights requiring relocations, or any required new street lights shall be designed in accordance with current City Standards for LS-3 type streetlights. Street light construction plans shall be prepared as separate plans or combined with the public street improvement plans as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. 196.Street Sweeping and Pavement Maintenance - The property owner shall file for annexation or inclusion into the CFD for street sweeping services and street pavement maintenance.

Prior to Issuance of Building Permit:
197.Encroachment Permits – The developer / property owner shall obtain all required encroachment permits and clearances prior to start of any work within City, State, or local agency right-of-way.
198.Improvement Bonds – Prior to issuance of any construction permit for all required onsite for grading and landscape improvements and offsite public improvements, the developer/project owner shall post acceptable bonds or security to guarantee the construction of all required improvements. The bonds shall be in accordance with all applicable City ordinances, resolutions and municipal codes.

Wheat Street Dedication - The developer / property owner shall construct or guarantee the construction of Wheat Street fronting the development to the Industrial Collector (2 lane) designation with an ultimate half-width Right of Way of 39 feet, 28 feet curb-to-centerline paved width, and an 11-foot landscaped parkway that includes a 6-foot sidewalk. If additional right of way is needed, the developer / property owner shall dedicate the necessary right of way fronting the development.

Byers Road Dedication - The developer / property owner shall construct or guarantee the construction of Byers Road fronting the development to the Industrial Collector (2 lane) designation with an ultimate half-width Right of Way of 39 feet, 28 feet curb-to-centerline paved width, Class III Community On-Street bike lanes, and an 11-foot landscaped parkway that includes a 6-foot sidewalk. If additional right of way is needed, the developer / property owner shall dedicate the necessary right of way fronting the development Prior to Issuance of Any Certificate of Occupancy:
199.Wheat Street Improvements – Improvements on Wheat Street fronting the development shall be completed to the Industrial Collector (2 lanes) designation with an ultimate half-width Right of Way of 39 feet, 28 feet curb-to-centerline paved width, and an 11-foot landscaped parkway that includes a 6-foot sidewalk, prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.

The improvements shall be adequately transitioned to the existing or proposed street improvements. It shall be the sole responsibility of the developer / property owner to obtain all proposed or required easements and / or permissions necessary to perform offsite grading, from affected landowners where necessary to construct the street improvements.

Notarized and recorded agreement or documents authorizing the offsite grading shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department. 200.Byers Road Improvements – Improvements on Byers Road fronting the development shall be completed to the Industrial Collector (2 lanes) designation with an ultimate half-width Right of Way of 39 feet, 28 feet curb-to-centerline paved width, and an 11-foot landscaped Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 203

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1015 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 parkway that includes a 6-foot sidewalk, prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.

Notarized and recorded agreement or documents authorizing the offsite grading shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department. 201.Kuffel Road Improvements – Improvements on Kuffel Road fronting the development shall be completed to the General Local (2-lane) designation with an ultimate half-width right- of-way of 30 feet, a paved curb-to-centerline width of 20 feet, and a 10-foot landscaped parkway that includes a 6-foot sidewalk, prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.

Notarized and recorded agreement or documents authorizing the offsite grading shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department. 202.Driveways and Driveway Approaches – Driveways and Driveway Approaches as shown on the approved plot plan shall be designed and constructed prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. The driveways shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City of Menifee standards and specifications and meet spacing requirements as well as other City requirements.

E. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
203.Traffic Study – The development shall comply with all the improvements and mitigation measures identified to be constructed or provided in the traffic study approved by the Public Works / Engineering Department. The following Traffic Study was reviewed and approved by the City:
a.Traffic Study for the CADO Warehouse Project In the City of Menifee, prepared by Kimley Horn, dated September 2023.

All required improvements and mitigations identified in the City-approved traffic study shall be included in all improvement plans for review and approval by the Public Works / Engineering Department. Additional improvements may be required to address public safety and welfare, as determined by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.

Prior to Issuance of Construction Permit:
204.Sight Distance Analysis – Sight distance analysis shall be conducted at all project roadway entrances for conformance with City sight distance standards. The analysis shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer, and shall be incorporated in the final the grading plans, street improvement plans, and landscape improvement plans.
205.Signing and Striping Plan – Prior to issuance of a construction permit, any necessary signing and striping for Wheat Street and Byers Road or any offsite improvements shall be Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 204

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1016 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer in accordance with City ordinances, standards and specifications, and with the latest edition of the CAMUTCD. 206.Driveway Geometrics – Final driveway geometrics may be modified in final engineering as approved by the City Engineer / Public Works Director. Driveways shall meet current standard radii on all existing and proposed commercial drive approaches used as access to the proposed development. The developer shall adhere to all City standards and regulations for access and ADA guidelines.
207.Construction Traffic Control Plan – Prior to start of any project related construction, the developer / property owner shall submit to the Public Works / Engineering Department for review and approval, a Construction Traffic Control Plan in compliance with all applicable City ordinances, standards and specifications, and the latest edition of the CAMUTCD. This traffic control plan shall address impacts from construction vehicular traffic, noise, and dust and shall propose measures to mitigate these effects. The traffic control plan shall include a Traffic Safety Plan for safe use of public roads right of way during construction. The plan shall specify the following mitigation measures to address the following:
a. Dust and dirt fallout from truck loads that gets entrained onto City roadways:
(1) Biweekly street sweeping during construction activity, and daily during all grading operations. (2) Approved BMPs shall be installed at all approved construction entrances as part of the SWPPP.
b. Noise from construction truck traffic: Include construction time and operation of vehicles through surrounding residential streets.
c. Traffic safety within the road right-of-way: Include temporary traffic control measures and devices.
208.Fair Share Cost Estimates – The developer / property owner shall contribute fair share costs for associated intersection geometrics and roadway improvements. A fair share cost estimate shall be prepared by developer / property owner that reflects costs at the time of project construction and be based on conceptual exhibits showing the proposed improvements overlaid onto the existing roadway in order to determine the construction cost of said improvement. The developer / property owner shall submit the conceptual exhibits and cost estimates to the Engineering Department for review, and the cost exhibits shall be approved prior to issuance of an encroachment permit for construction.

Prior to Issuance of Any Certificate of Occupancy:
209.Construction of Roadway Improvements – The developer / property owner shall design and construct the following roadway improvements. The improvements shall be complete prior to any certificate of occupancy.
•Wheat Street Frontage Improvements:
a. Construct Wheat Street as a 2-lane Industrial Collector (78 feet total right- of-way width). The improvements shall extend to the centerline plus an additional 12 feet past the centerline, including the necessary offsite transitions to the existing pavement as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. The design shall be finalized in final engineering.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 205

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1017 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 b. Modify the existing northbound shared lane to a right-turn only lane, such that no left turns are allowed at the intersection of Wheat Street and Ethanac Road.
•Byers Road Frontage Improvements:
a. Construct Byers Road as a 2-lane Industrial Collector (78 feet total right- of-way width). The improvements shall extend to the centerline plus an additional 12 feet past the centerline, including the necessary offsite transitions to the existing pavement as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. The design shall be finalized in final engineering. •Kuffel Road Frontage Improvements:
a. Construct Kuffel Road as a 2-lane General Local (60 feet total right-of-way width). The improvements shall extend to the centerline plus an additional 12 feet past the centerline, including the necessary offsite transitions to the existing pavement as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. The design shall be finalized in final engineering. •Traffic Signal and Related Improvements at Intersection of Ethanac Road and Byers Road:
a. Install a traffic signal. The traffic signal shall provide protected westbound left-turn phasing.
b. Modify the existing northbound shared lane to a right-turn only lane. c. Add a dedicated northbound left-turn lane.
d. Increase the left-turn pocket length to 350 feet.
•Traffic Signal and Related Improvements at Intersection of Murrieta Road and Ethanac Road:
a. Add a dedicated northbound right-turn lane.
b. Modify the existing traffic signal as follows:
•Add northbound right-turn overlap phasing.
•Modify the northbound / southbound phasing from “split” to “protected”.
c. Add an eastbound right-turn lane.
d. Add a dedicated northbound left-turn lane.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 206

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1018 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 •Traffic Signal and Related Improvements at Intersection of Evans Road and Ethanac Road:
a. Install a traffic signal. The traffic signal shall provide northbound right-turn overlap phasing.
b. Modify the existing northbound shared lane to a right-turn lane. c. Add a northbound left-turn lane.
210.RBBD Reimbursement for Traffic Signal and Related Improvements at Intersection of Murrieta Road and Ethanac Road – In the event where a Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD) is established that includes improvements constructed by this project at the intersection of Murrieta Road and Ethanac Road, the developer / property owner may enter into an RBBD Agreement with the City of Menifee providing reimbursement for applicable improvements in the form of credit to required RBBD payments. In the event where the constructed improvements exceed the project’s RBBD obligations, the project shall receive reimbursement for said improvements upon receipt of RBBD fees from applicable adjacent projects.
211.RBBD Reimbursement for Traffic Signal and Related Improvements at Intersection of Evans Road and Ethanac Road – In the event where a Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD) is established that includes improvements constructed by this project at the intersection of Evans Road and Ethanac Road, the developer / property owner may enter into an RBBD Agreement with the City of Menifee providing reimbursement for applicable improvements in the form of credit to required RBBD payments. In the event where the constructed improvements exceed the project’s RBBD obligations, the project shall receive reimbursement for said improvements upon receipt of RBBD fees from applicable adjacent projects.
212.Fair Share Cost Participation for Offsite Improvements – The developer / property owner shall pay fair share costs for the offsite improvements listed below. If a listed improvement is part of the City of Menifee DIF program, then developer / property owner may pay DIF fees, and such payment shall constitute full satisfaction of this fair share condition for that improvement. If an improvement is part of the TUMF program, then developer / property owner may pay TUMF fees, and such payment shall constitute full satisfaction of this fair share condition for that improvement. If an improvement is not part of the DIF or TUMF programs, then the developer / property owner shall pay a fair share cost for that improvement which shall be calculated as set forth in Condition No. 233 based on the percentage of fair share listed below for each improvement:
a.I-215 Southbound Ramps at Ethanac Road: Improve intersection geometrics at a fair share cost of 22.1% of the total cost of the improvements.

The intersection improvements are as follows:
a. Add a second eastbound through lane.
b. Add a second westbound left-turn lane.
c. Modify the southbound approach to provide one left-turn lane, one right- turn lane, and one shared left / thru / right lane.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 207

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1019 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 d. Add a free eastbound right-turn lane.
b.I-215 Northbound Ramps at Ethanac Road: Improve intersection geometrics at a fair share cost of 15.9% of the total cost of the improvements. The intersection improvements are as follows:
a. Add a second eastbound through lane.
b. Add a second westbound through lane.
c. Add a dedicated westbound right-turn lane.
d. Add a second eastbound left-turn lane.
e. Add a second northbound left-turn lane.
c.Intersection of Trumble Road and Ethanac Road: Improve intersection geometrics at a fair share cost of 5.2% of the total cost of the improvements.

The intersection improvements are as follows:
a. Add a second eastbound through lane.
b. Add a second westbound through lane.
d.Traffic Signal and Related Improvements at Intersection of Sherman Road and Ethanac Road: Improve intersection geometrics at a fair share cost of 5.2% of the total cost of the improvements. The intersection improvements are as follows:
a. Install a traffic signal. The traffic signal shall provide protected left-turn phasing on the eastbound / westbound approaches, as well as split phasing on the northbound / southbound approaches.
b. Add a second eastbound through lane.
c. Add a second westbound through lane.
d. Modify the northbound approach to include a dedicated left-turn lane and a shared left / thru / right lane.
e. Add a dedicated southbound left-turn lane.
f. Add a dedicated eastbound left-turn lane.
g. Add a dedicated westbound left-turn lane.
e.Traffic Signal at Intersection of Murrieta Road and Rouse Road: Improve intersection geometrics at a fair share cost of 10.2% of the total cost of the improvements. The intersection improvements are as follows:

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 208

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1020 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 a. Install a traffic signal.
f.I-215 Southbound Ramps at McCall Boulevard: Improve intersection geometrics at a fair share cost of 6.4% of the total cost of the improvements.

The intersection improvements are as follows:
a. Add a second southbound right-turn lane.
b. Add a southbound left-turn lane.
g.I-215 Northbound Ramps at McCall Boulevard: Improve intersection geometrics at a fair share cost of 1.9% of the total cost of the improvements.

The intersection improvements are as follows:
a.Add a second northbound right-turn lane.

Additional Improvements – The City Engineer will determine whether the following additional improvements will be constructed or funded through a fair share cost participation by the Developer:
a.Traffic Signal and Related Improvements at Intersection of Murrieta Road and Ethanac Road:
i. Add a dedicated northbound right-turn lane.
ii. Modify the existing traffic signal as follows:

1. Add northbound right-turn overlap phasing.

2. Modify the northbound / southbound phasing from “split” to “protected”.
iii. Add an eastbound right-turn lane.
b. Traffic Signal and Related Improvements at Intersection of Evans Road and Ethanac Road:
i. Install a traffic signal. The traffic signal shall provide northbound right-turn overlap phasing.
ii. Modify the existing northbound shared lane to a right-turn lane. iii. Add a northbound left-turn lane.
213.RBBD Replacement of Fair Share Contributions – In the event where a RBBD is established prior to the fair share contribution requirements, the project’s RBBD obligation shall supersede any applicable fair share requirement.

F. NPDES and WQMP
214.Stormwater Management – All City of Menifee requirements for NPDES and Water Quality Management Plans (WQMP) shall be met per City of Menifee Municipal Code Chapter 15.01 for Stormwater/Urban Runoff Management Program and as determined and approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. This project is required to submit a project specific WQMP prepared in accordance with the latest WQMP guidelines approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 209

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1021 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 215.Trash Enclosures Standards and Specifications – Storm runoff resulting in direct contact with trash enclosure, or wastewater runoff from trash enclosure are prohibited from running off a site onto the City MS4 without proper treatment. Trash enclosures in new developments and redevelopment projects shall meet new storm water quality standards including:
a. Provision of a solid impermeable roof with a minimum clearance height to allow the bin lid to completely open.
b. Constructed of reinforced masonry without wooden gates. Walls shall be at least 6 feet high.
c. Provision of concrete slab floor, graded to collect any spill within the enclosure. d. All trash bins in the trash enclosure shall be leak proof with lids that are continuously kept closed.
e. The enclosure area shall be protected from receiving direct rainfall or run-on from collateral surfaces.
f. The trash enclosure shall be lockable and locked when not in use with a 2-inch or larger brass resettable combination lock. Only employees and staff authorized by the enclosure property owner shall be given access.

Any standing liquids within the trash enclosures without floor drain must be cleaned up and disposed of properly using a mop and a bucket or a wet/dry vacuum machine. All non- hazardous liquids without solid trash may be put in the sanitary sewer as an option, in accordance with Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) criteria.

An alternate floor drain from the interior of the enclosure that discharges to the sanitary sewer may be constructed only after obtaining approval from EMWD. This option requires the following:
a. The trash enclosure shall be lockable and locked when not in use with a 2-inch or larger brass resettable combination lock. Only employees and staff authorized by the enclosure property owner shall be given access. This requirement may not be applicable to commercial complexes with multiple tenants.
b. A waterless trap primer shall be provided to prevent escape of gasses from the sewer line and save water.
c. Hot and cold running water shall be provided with a connection nearby with an approved backflow preventer. The spigot shall be protected and located at the rear of the enclosure to prevent damage from bins.
216.SWRCB, TRASH AMENDMENTS - The State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) adopted amendments to the Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California and the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries – collectively referred to as the “Trash Amendments.” Applicable requirements per these amendments shall be adhered to with implementation measures, prior to building Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 210

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1022 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 permit issuance. Projects determined to be within Priority Land Uses as defined in the Trash Amendments, shall provide trash full capture devices to remove trash from all Priority Land Use areas that will contribute storm water runoff to the City of Menifee’s MS4. All trash full capture devices shall be listed on the State Board’s current list of certified full capture devices posted on their website:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/trash_implementation. shtml
All trash full capture devices shall be approved by State or Regional Water Quality Control Board staff. Storm water runoff from privately owned Priority Land Use areas shall be treated by full capture devices located within privately owned storm drain structures or otherwise located on the privately owned property, whenever possible. Runoff from Priority Land Use areas created or modified by the project, and which are proposed to be City owned, shall be treated by full capture devices located within city-owned storm drains or otherwise located within the public right of way.

Prior to Grading Permit Issuance:
217.Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan (Final WQMP) – The following report was reviewed and approved by the City:
a.Project Specific Preliminary Water Quality Management, prepared by Albert A.

Webb Associates, dated October 15, 2021.

Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a FINAL project-specific WQMP in substantial conformance with the approved PRELIMINARY WQMP, shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works / Engineering Department. Additionally, the FINAL WQMP shall also include the following:
a. A signed Owner’s / Preparer’s Certification.
b. Biotreatment units (Modular Wetlands) in place of the catch basins that are proposed to capture and route the offsite flows to the onsite bioretention basin. c. City-approved construction plans in Appendix 2.
d. The City-approved final geotechnical / supplemental report in Appendix 3. e. The City-approved Phase I ESA in Appendix 4.
f. Design calculations for the biotreatment units in Appendix 6. g. Project-specific source control information in Appendix 8. h. The operation and maintenance plan and documentation of finance, maintenance, and recording mechanisms in Appendix 9.
i. BMP Fact Sheets, maintenance guidelines, and other end-user BMP information in Appendix 10.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 211

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1023 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 The final developed project construction plans shall implement all structural and non- structural BMPs specified in the approved FINAL WQMP. One copy of the approved FINAL WQMP on a CD-ROM or USB in PDF format shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for review and approval.
218.Revising the FINAL WQMP - In the event the Final WQMP requires design revisions that will substantially deviate from the approved preliminary WQMP, a revised or new WQMP shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public Works / Engineering Department.

The cost of reviewing the revised/new WQMP shall be charged on a time and materials basis.

The fixed fee to review a FINAL WQMP shall not apply, and a deposit shall be collected from the applicant to pay for reviewing the substantially-revised WQMP. 219.WQMP Maintenance Agreement – All water quality features or BMPs that address onsite drainage shall be located within the property limits, and the maintenance shall be the full responsibility of the developer / project owner. Prior to, or concurrent with the approval of the FINAL WQMP, the developer / property owner shall record Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) that addresses the implementation and maintenance of proposed WQMP BMPs, or enter into an acceptable maintenance agreement with the City to inform future property owners of the requirement to perpetually implement the approved FINAL WQMP.

Prior to Issuance of Any Certificate of Occupancy:
220.WQMP/BMP Education – Prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the developer / project owner shall provide the City proof of notification to future occupants of all BMP’s and educational and training requirements for said BMP’s as directed in the approved FINAL WQMP. Proof of notification shall be provided to the Public Works / Engineering Department in forms determined acceptable by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.

Public Education Program materials may be obtained from the Flood Control District’s NPDES Section through their website at www.rcwatershed.org.

A copy of the notarized affidavit must be placed in the FINAL WQMP. The Public Works / Engineering Department MUST also receive the original notarized affidavit with the plan check submittal in order to clear the appropriate condition. Placing a copy of the affidavit without submitting the original will not guarantee clearance of the condition. 221.Implement WQMP - All structural BMPs described in the FINAL WQMP shall be constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications. It shall be demonstrated that the applicant is prepared to implement all BMPs described in the approved FINAL WQMP and that copies of the approved FINAL WQMP are available for the future owners/occupants. The City will not release occupancy permits for any portion of the project until all proposed BMPs described in the approved FINAL WQMP, to which the portion of the project is tributary to, are completed and operational. 222.Inspection of BMP Installation – Prior to issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, all structural BMPs included in the approved FINAL WQMP shall be inspected for completion of installation in accordance with approved plans and specifications, and the FINAL WQMP.

The Public Works Stormwater Inspection team shall verify that all proposed structural BMPs are in working conditions, and that a hard copy and / or digital copy of the approved FINAL WQMP are available at the site for use and reference by future owners/occupants. The inspection shall ensure that the FINAL WQMP at the site includes the BMP Operation and Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 212

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1024 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Maintenance Plan, and shall include the site in a City-maintained database for future periodic inspection.

G. WATER, SEWER, and RECYCLED WATER
223.EMWD Minimum Standards – All public water, sewer and recycled water improvements shall be designed per City standards and ordinances and Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) standards and specifications, including required auxiliaries and appurtenances. The final design, including pipe sizes and alignments, shall be subject to the approval of EMWD and the City of Menifee.
224.Utility Improvement Plans – Public Water, Sewer and Recycled Water improvements shall be drawn on City title block for review and approval by the Public Works / Engineering Department and EMWD.
225.Onsite and Offsite Sewer, Water and Recycled Water Improvements – All public onsite and offsite sewer, water and recycled water improvements shall be guaranteed for construction prior to building permit and approval of improvement plans. 226.Sewer Lines – Any new public sewer line alignments or realignments shall be designed such that the manholes are aligned with the center of lanes or on the lane line and in accordance with City standards and ordinances and EMWD standards and specifications. 227.Water Mains and Hydrants - All water mains and fire hydrants providing required fire flows shall be constructed in accordance with City standards and ordinances, as well as those of the Riverside County Fire Department and EMWD standards and specifications.

H. CFD
Prior to Final Map Recordation:
228.Annexation to the CFD – Prior to final map recordation, the developer / property owner shall complete the annexation of the proposed development, into the boundaries of the City of Menifee CFD. The CFD shall be responsible for:
a. The maintenance of public improvements or facilities that benefit this development, including but not limited to, the following: Public landscaping, streetlights, streets, drainage facilities, water quality BMPs, graffiti abatement, and other public improvements or facilities as approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.
b. The developer / property owner shall be responsible for all costs associated with the annexation of the proposed development in the CFD. 229.CFD Annexation Agreement – In the event timing for this development’s schedule prevents the developer / property owner from complying with the above condition of approval for CFD annexation, the developer shall enter into a CFD annexation agreement to allow the annexation to complete after map recordation but prior to the issuance of a building permit.

The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the preparation of the CFD annexation agreement. The agreement shall be approved by the City Council prior to issuance of a building permit.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 213

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1025 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 230.Landscape Improvement Plans for CFD Maintenance – Landscape improvements within public ROW and / or areas dedicated to the City for the citywide CFD to maintain shall be prepared on a separate City CFD plan for review and approval by the Public Works / Engineering Department.
231.CFD Landscape Guidelines and Improvement Plans – All landscape improvements for maintenance by the CFD shall be designed and installed in accordance with City CFD Landscape Guidelines and shall be drawn on a separate improvement plan on City title block.

The landscape improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works / Engineering Department prior to issuance of a construction permit. 232.Landscaping Within the Public Right-of-Way – The parkway areas around the sidewalk within the public right-of-way fronting the entire property shall be landscaped and irrigated per City standards and guidelines. These areas shall be maintained by the CFD. 233.Maintenance of CFD Accepted Facilities – All landscaping and appurtenant facilities to be maintained by the citywide CFD shall be built to City standards. The developer shall be responsible for ensuring that landscaping areas to be maintained by the CFD have its own controller and meter system, separate from any private controller/meter system.

I. WASTE MANAGEMENT
Prior to Building Permit Issuance:
234.Recyclables Collection and Loading Area Plot Plan - Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each building, the applicant shall submit three (3) copies of a Recyclables Collection and Loading Area plot plan to the City of Menifee Engineering/Public Works Department for review and approval. The plot plan shall show the location of and access to the collection area for recyclable materials, along with its dimensions and construction detail, including elevation/façade, construction materials and signage. The plot plan shall clearly indicate how the trash and recycling enclosures shall be accessed by the hauler.

The applicant shall provide documentation to the Community Development Department to verify that Engineering and Public Works has approved the plan prior to issuance of a building permit.
235.Waste Recycling Plan - Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each building, a Waste Recycling Plan (WRP) shall be submitted to the City of Menifee Engineering/Public Works Department for approval. Completion of Form B “Waste Reporting Form” of the Construction and Demolition Waste Diversion Program may be sufficient proof of WRP compliance, as determined by the Public Works Director / City Engineer. At a minimum, the WRP must identify the materials (i.e., concrete, asphalt, wood, etc.) that will be generated by construction and development, the projected amounts, the measures/methods that will be taken to recycle, reuse, and / or reduce the amounts of materials, the facilities and / or haulers that will be utilized, and the targeted recycling or reduction rate. During project construction, the project site shall have, at a minimum, two (2) bins; one for waste disposal and the other for recycling of Construction and Demolition (C&D) materials. Additional bins are encouraged to be used to further source separation of C&D recyclable materials. Accurate record keeping (receipts) for recycling of C&D recyclable materials and solid waste disposal must be kept.

Arrangements shall be made through the City’s franchise hauler, Waste Management.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 214

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1026 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Prior to Issuance of Any Certificate of Occupancy:
236.Waste Management Clearance - Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for each building, evidence (i.e., receipts or other type of verification) shall be submitted to demonstrate project compliance with the approved WRP to the Engineering and Public Works Department in order to clear the project for occupancy permits. Receipts must clearly identify the amount of waste disposed and Construction and Demolition (C&D) materials recycled. Completion of Form C, “Waste Reporting Form” of the Construction and Demolition Waste Diversion Program along with the receipts may be sufficient proof of WRP compliance, as determined by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.

The developer shall use the City’s franchise hauler, Waste Management.

J. FEES, DEPOSITS and DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
237.Fees and Deposits – Prior to approval of grading plans, improvement plans, issuance of building permits, map recordation, and / or issuance of certificate of occupancy, the developer / property owner shall pay all fees, deposits as applicable. These shall include the regional Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Development Impact Fees (DIF), and any applicable regional fees including potential Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD) Fees. Said fees and deposits shall be collected at the rate in effect at the time of collection as specified in current City resolutions and ordinances. 238.Road Bridge Benefit District – The applicant shall pay the RBBD fees based on the designated land use and areas, prior to the issuance of a building permit. Should the project proponent choose to defer the time of payment, a written request shall be submitted to the City, deferring said payment from the time of issuance of a building permit to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Fees which are deferred shall be based upon the fee schedule in effect at the time of issuance of the permit of each parcel. 239.TUMF Fees – Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the developer / property owner shall pay the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) in accordance with the fee schedule in effect at the time of issuance, pursuant to adopted City Ordinance governing the TUMF program.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 215

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1027 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Tentative Parcel Map Conditions of Approval
Standard Policies and Procedures
240.Subdivision Map Act – The developer / property owner shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and all other laws, ordinances, and regulations pertaining to the subdivision of land.
241.Existing and Proposed Easements – The final map shall correctly show all existing easements, traveled ways, drainage courses, and encumbrances. Any omission or misrepresentation of these documents may require said map to be resubmitted for further consideration.
242.Final Map Submittal Process – Appropriate final map plan check submittal forms shall be completed and appropriate fees or deposits paid. Prior to approval of the final map by the City Council, the developer / property owner shall provide along with the final map mylars, electronic files of the final map on Compact Disc (CD), in one of the following formats: (a) Auto CAD DXF, (b) GIS shapefile (made up of ESRI extensions .shp, .shx and .dbf) and (c) Geodatabase (made up of ESRI extension .gdb). CAD files created with the latest version shall only be accepted if approved by the Public Works Director / City Engineer.

A. GENERAL CONDITIONS
243.Parcel Map – The proposed development includes eight (8) parcels that will be consolidated into one (1) parcel, and as such, the developer / project owner shall prepare and file a parcel map. The parcel map shall be submitted to the Public Works / Engineering Department for review and approval prior to recordation.

B. DEDICATIONS
244.Street Dedications – Street dedications shall conform to all applicable City Design Standards and Specifications, the City General Plan, and all other relevant laws, rules and regulations governing street construction in the City.
a. Wheat Street – The dedication for Wheat Street along the project frontage shall be for an Industrial Collector (2-lane) designation with an ultimate half-width right-of-way of 39 feet.
b. Byers Road – The dedication for Byers Road along the project frontage shall be for an Industrial Collector (2-lane) designation with an ultimate half-width right-of-way of 39 feet.
c. Kuffel Road – The dedication for Kuffel Road along the project frontage shall be for a General Local (2-lane) designation with an ultimate half-width right-of- way of 30 feet.

C. FEES, DEPOSITS and DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
245.Fees and Deposits – Prior to map recordation, the developer / property owner shall pay all fees, deposits as applicable. These shall include the regional Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), Development Impact Fees (DIF), and any applicable regional fees Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 216

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1028 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 including potential Road and Bridge Benefit District (RBBD) Fees. Said fees and deposits shall be collected at the rate in effect at the time of collection as specified in current City resolutions and ordinances.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 217

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1029 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Section III:

Building and Safety Department
Conditions of Approval
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 218

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1030 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
246.Final Building & Safety Conditions. Final Building & Safety Conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building & Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 247.Compliance with Code. All Design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2019 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2019 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2019 California Energy Codes, 2019 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Menifee Municipal Code. If a code cycle changes prior to submission of any plans or documents, the plans submitted shall be updated to the current State of California, Title 24, Code of Regulations, City of Menifee Ordinance, or any other state, federal, or city requirements.
248.ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include:
a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building.
c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right of way to all public areas on site, such as enclosures, clubhouses and picnic areas.
249.California Green Building Code Requirements.
a. The plans shall clearly indicate the location and total amount of Clean Air Vehicle (CAV) parking stalls as required, if applicable.
b. The plans shall clearly indicate the location and total amount of future electric vehicle (EV) parking stalls within the site.
250.County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at the time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan with a “photometric study” showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building & Safety Department. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin and below. 251.Street Name Addressing. Applicant must obtain street name addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street name addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial, residential/tract, or multi-family residential projects. 252.Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 253.Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Temporary construction/sales trailers, temporary power poles/generators, trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, building and monument signage, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits.

Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 219

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1031 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 254.Sanitary Sewer and Domestic Water Plan Approvals. On-site sanitary sewer and domestic water plans will require separate approvals and permits from Building and Safety.

A total of 6 sets shall be submitted.
255.Demolition. (If applicable) Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits.

AQMD notification and approval may be required.
256.Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance of the project indicating the hours or construction, as allowed by the City of Menifee Municipal Ordinance 8.01.010, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday 6:30am to 7:00pm. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized holidays unless approval is obtained from the City Building Official or City Engineer.
257.House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed.

AT PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL
258.Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building & Safety one (1) complete set of each document listed below for electronic submittals or, seven (7) complete sets of plans and two (2) sets of supporting documents, two (2) sets of calculations for review including:

All plans shall be submitted on minimum 24” x 36” size paper or digital equivalent.

General Requirements
a. All sheets of the plans and the first sheet of the calculations are required to be signed by the licensed architect or engineer responsible for the plan preparation. (Business & Professions Code 5802), (Business & Professions Code 5536.1, 5802, & 6735)
Cover Sheet
b. Vicinity Map
c. Parcel number and Site Address
d. Business Name
e. Building data: Building Type of Construction, Square Feet of leased area intended use/occupancy, occupant loads, Building Code Data: 2019 California Building Code, 2019 California Electrical Code, 2019 California Mechanical Code, 2019 California Plumbing Code, 2019 California Green Building Code, 2019 California Energy Code, and 2019 California Fire Code. f. List any flammable/combustible materials, chemicals, toxics, or hazardous materials used or stored and total quantities or each, including MSDS reports. g. Indicate if the building has a fire sprinkler system.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 220

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1032 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 h. Sheet Index
Plot Plans
a. North Arrow
b. Property Lines/Easements
c. Street/Alleys
d. Clearly dimension building setbacks from property lines, street centerlines, and from all adjacent buildings and structures on the site plan.

PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
259. All associated Building Fees to be paid.
260. Each Department is required to Approve, with a signature.

PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION
261.Pre-Construction Meeting. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction.

PRIOR TO TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (IF APPLICABLE) 262.Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Application and deposit to be submitted, a minimum of 5 working days prior to effective date. Each department is required to provide an Exhibit’ clearly identifying those Conditions of Approval that remain outstanding with a signature.

PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
263. Each department is required to Review and Approve with a signature once ALL Conditions of Approval have been Met/Approved.

PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION
264. Each department that has conditions shall have completed and approved their final inspection prior to requesting the final inspection by the Building and Safety Department.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 221

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1033 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Section IV:

Office of the Fire Marshal
Conditions of Approval
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 222

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1034 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 It is the responsibility of the recipient of these Fire Department conditions to forward then to all interested parties. The permit number (as it is noted above) is required on all correspondence.

Additional information is available at our website: www.rvcfire.org Questions should be directed to the Riverside County Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshal at City of Menifee 29714 Haun Rd., Menifee, CA 92586. Phone (951)723-3767

COMMENTS
265.Surface Load and Capabilities- Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed to support the impose loads of fire apparatus [80,000 pound live load (gross vehicular weight) distributed over two axles] and shall be surfaced so as to provide all-weather driving capabilities [rear wheel drive apparatus] for the length and grade(s) of the fire apparatus access road.
266.Aerial Fire Apparatus Access Roads- Where the vertical distance between grade plane and the highest roof surface exceeds 30 feet, approved aerial fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have unobstructed width of 26 feet, exclusive of shoulders, in the immediate vicinity of the building or portion thereof, with an unobstructed vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches. 267.Minimum Required Fire Flow - The Fire Department is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings in accordance with Ordinance 787 and the California Fire Code. A fire flow of 4000 gpm for a 4-hour duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure must be available before any combustible material is placed on the job site. A minimum number of 5 Super fire hydrant(s) (6”x4”x2½”x2½”) shall be provided for this project. Additional fire hydrants may be required to meet the spacing requirements of the California Fire Code.
268.Hydrant System - A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants (6”x4”x2½”x2½”) on a looped system shall be provided spaced an average of 300 feet between fire hydrants and in no case shall fire hydrants be further than 180 feet from any portion of on a street or road frontage as measured along approved vehicular travel ways.

Fire hydrant(s) shall be located so that no portion of the building is farther than 250 feet from any hydrant(s) as measured along approved vehicular travel ways. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. 269.Additional Required Hydrants - Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, fire hydrants shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 1,000 feet to provide for transportation hazards.
270.Gates - Gate entrances shall be at least two feet wider than the width of the traffic lanes serving the gate. Any gate providing access from a road to a driveway shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, 38 feet turning radius shall be used. 271.Auto Gates- Gates shall be automatic minimum 26 feet in width. Gate access shall be equipped with a rapid entry system to include OPTICOM and Knox Electric switches. Plan Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 223

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1035 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Automatic/manual gate pins shall be rated with shear pin force, not to exceed 30 pounds. Automatic gates shall be equipped with emergency backup power. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system.
272.Fire Department Access - Fire apparatus access roads shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. 273.Turn Around - Turn arounds shall be provided to all building sites on fire apparatus access roads over 150 feet in length and shall be within 50 feet of the building. The minimum outside turning radius for a turnaround shall be 38 feet, not including parking. If a hammerhead is used instead, the top of the “T” shall be a minimum of 110 feet in length. 274.Sprinkler System- Buildings or structures exceeding 3600 sq. ft are required to have approved CFC and NFPA 13 compliant fire sprinkler systems installed. ESFR system to be required for a project of this size.
275.Building Access - Shall comply per Table 3206.2 California Fire Code, fire apparatus access roads in accordance with Section 503 shall be provided within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of buildings used for high pile storage. 276.Access Doors - Where building access is required by Table 3206.2, fire department access doors shall be provided in accordance with this section. Access doors shall be accessible without the use of a ladder.
277.Number of Doors Required - The required fire department access doors shall be distributed such that the lineal distance between adjacent fire department access door does not exceed 125 ft measured center to center.
278.Smoke and Heat Removal - Where smoke and heat removal is required by Table 3206.2 it shall be in accordance with Section 910.

If any of the conditions are unclear, difficult to understand, or you would like to set up a meeting, please contact me at (951) 723-3765 so that I can better assist you in the approval of this project.

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 224

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1036 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Section V:

Riverside County Environmental Health
Conditions of Approval
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 225

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1037 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 226

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1038 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 227

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1039 of 1464

4 9
1 6
3 The undersigned warrants that he/she is an authorized representative of the project referenced above, that I am specifically authorized to consent to all of the foregoing conditions, and that I so consent as of the date set out below. _______________________________________________ ___________________ Signed Date
_______________________________________________ ___________________ Name (please print) Title (please print)
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 228

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1040 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 229

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1041 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 230

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1042 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 231

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1043 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 232

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1044 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 233

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1045 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 234

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1046 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 235

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1047 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 236

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1048 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 237

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1049 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 238

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1050 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 239

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1051 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 240

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1052 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 241

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1053 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 242

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1054 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 243

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1055 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 244

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1056 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 245

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1057 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 246

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1058 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 247

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1059 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 248

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1060 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 249

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1061 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 250

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1062 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 251

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1063 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 252

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1064 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 253

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1065 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 254

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1066 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 255

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1067 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 256

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1068 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 257

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1069 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 258

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1070 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 259

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1071 of 1464

Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 260

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1072 of 1464

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 p.m. or as soon as possible thereafter.

DATE OF HEARING: November 6, 2024
PLACE OF HEARING:MENIFEE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
29844 HAUN ROAD MENIFEE, CA 92586
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled, pursuant to the City of Menifee Municipal Code, before the CITY OF MENIFEE CITY COUNCIL to consider the project shown below:

Project Title:

Appeal Nos. PLN 24-0169 and Appeal No. PLN 24-0182 of the Planning Commission Decision for the “CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project” (Tentative Parcel Map [TPM] No. 38139 [PLN 22-0041] and Plot Plan No. PLN 21-0370)
Project Location:

The Project is generally located west of Interstate 215 (I-215) and south of State Highway (SH) 74, within the City of Menifee (City), County of Riverside, State of California. The Project is north of Corsica Lane, south of Kuffel Road, east of Wheat Street, and west of Byers Road. The Project site is located in the Economic Development Corridor- Northern Gateway (EDC-NG) zone of the City and is currently bordered by a scattering of existing rural residential properties (1-5 acres) and vacant land. The Project site consists of eight parcels (Assessor Parcel Numbers: 330-190-002 through -005 and 330-190-010 through -013).

General Plan Land Use and Zoning:

Economic Development Corridor – Northern Gateway (EDC-NG) Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 261

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1073 of 1464

The City Council will consider the following project at a public hearing:

On August 14, 2024, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and voted 3-1-1 to approve Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) No. 38139 (PLN 22-0041) and Plot Plan No. PLN 21-0370 – CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project along with the related environmental analysis. On August 20, 2024, the City received an application from the Golden State Environmental Justice Alliance to appeal the Planning Commission decision.

On August 23, 2024, the City received a second application from the City of Perris to appeal the Planning Commission decision.

Tentative Parcel Map No. PLN 22-0041 proposes to consolidate eight (8) parcels into one (1) industrial parcel.

The Project site is approximately 40.03 gross acres and 36.81 net acres.

Plot Plan No. No. PLN 21-0370 proposes a 700,037-square-foot warehouse/industrial building with 10,000 square feet of office space and 690,037 square feet of warehouse space on a 36.8-net acre (40.03 gross acre) site. There will be three (3) points of access on Byers Road and two (2) points of access on Wheat Street.

Associated facilities and improvements of the Project include on-site landscaping, parking, regional Project access, and off-site improvements (roadway improvements, storm drain, utilities).

Environmental Information: Additional environmental review of the appealed Project is not required. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC24-639 which was prepared for the Project (State Clearinghouse No. 2022040622), and mitigations measures were provided. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) determined the Project could result in significant and unavoidable impacts under the category of Greenhouse Gas Emissions based on the analysis and findings in the Draft EIR and required adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations. Following the Project’s approval, a Notice of Determination was filed with the Riverside County Clerk’s Office and State Clearinghouse on August 16, 2024. The Environmental Impact Report can be found at the following web address: http://www.cityofmenifee.us/325/Environmental- Notices-Documents.

Any person wishing to comment on the proposed project may do so in writing between the date of this notice and the public hearing and be heard at the time and place noted above. All comments must be received prior to the time of public hearing. All such comments will be submitted to the City Council, and the City Council will consider such comments, in addition to any oral testimony, before making a decision on the proposed project.

If this project is challenged in court, the issues may be limited to those raised at the public hearing, described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Be advised that as a result of public hearings and comment, the City Council may amend, in whole or in part, the proposed project. Accordingly, the designations, development standards, design or improvements, or any properties or lands within the boundaries of the proposed project, may be changed in a way other than specifically proposed.

For further information regarding this project, please contact Ryan Fowler at (951) 723-3740 or e-mail [email protected], or go to the City of Menifee’s agenda web page at http://www.cityofmenifee.us. To view the case file for the proposed project contact the Community Development Department office at (951) 672- 6777 Monday through Friday, from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. Please send all written correspondence to:

CITY OF MENIFEE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attn: Ryan Fowler, Principal Planner
29844 Haun Road
Menifee, CA 92584
Item Title: 11.1
Appeals of the Planning Commission Decision for the CADO Menifee Industrial Warehouse Project Item Page Number: 262

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1074 of 1464

CITY OF MENIFEE
SUBJECT: Ordinance Introduction and First Reading for Change Proceedings for Improvement Area Nos. 2 and 3 of
Community Facilities District No. 2022-3, Legado
MEETING DATE: November 6, 2024
TO: Mayor and City Council
PREPARED BY: Lauri Lockwood, Financial Analyst
REVIEWED BY: Travis Hickey, Chief Financial Officer
APPROVED BY: Armando G. Villa, City Manager
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Adopt a resolution amending the boundary map of Community Facilities District No. 2022-3, Legado, located to the northwest of Antelope Road and Chambers Avenue and south of Rouse Road, amending the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for Improvement Area No. 2, decreasing the maximum authorized bonded indebtedness for Improvement Area No. 2, designating Improvement Area No. 3 and declaring the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within Improvement Area No. 3; and

2. Adopt a resolution certifying election results for Community Facilities District No. 2022-3, Legado; and

3. Introduce an ordinance authorizing the levy of special taxes within Improvement Area No. 2 and Improvement Area No. 3 of Community Facilities District No. 2022-3, Legado.

DISCUSSION
BLC Fleming, LLC (the “Developer”) and the City of Menifee (“the City”) previously worked together to form Community Facilities District No. 2022-3, Legado, of the City of Menifee (the “CFD”) for the development project known as Legado (“Project”). The property is located to the northwest of Antelope Road and Chambers Avenue and south of Rouse Road.

The CFD included two improvement areas designated Improvement Area No. 1 (“Improvement Area No. 1”) and Improvement Area No. 2 (“Improvement Area No. 2”). The Developer has entered into a contract to sell the property in the CFD to Lennar Homes (“Lennar”) in three separate “Phases.” Lennar has closed on the Phase 1 property (491 homesites); however, the closing of the Phase 2 property (201 homesites) and the Phase 3 property (330 homesites) will Item Title: 11.2
Ordinance

Introduction

and

First

Reading

for

Change

Proceedings

for

Improvement

Area

Nos.

2 and

3 of

Community
Facilities District No. 2022-3, Legado
Item Page Number: 1

Menifee Mayor and City Council
November 6, 2024
Page
1075 of 1464

City of Menifee Staff Report
Community Facilities District No. 2022-3 (Legado)
November 6, 2024

Page 2 of 3 ends

Menifee City CouncilNovember 6, 2024

Menifee City Council
November 6, 2024