F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2083 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR224
3+50 0.5049 2.22 | V Q | | | |
3+55 0.5216 2.43 | V Q | | | |
4+ 0 0.5388 2.49 | V Q | | | |
4+ 5 0.5561 2.52 | V Q | | | |
4+10 0.5736 2.54 | V Q | | | |
4+15 0.5911 2.55 | V Q | | | |
4+20 0.6093 2.64 | V Q | | | |
4+25 0.6290 2.85 | V Q | | | |
4+30 0.6490 2.92 | V Q | | | |
4+35 0.6693 2.95 | V Q | | | |
4+40 0.6897 2.96 | V Q | | | |
4+45 0.7102 2.97 | V Q | | | |
4+50 0.7313 3.07 | V Q | | | |
4+55 0.7539 3.28 | V Q | | | |
5+ 0 0.7769 3.34 | V Q | | | |
5+ 5 0.7989 3.20 | V Q | | | |
5+10 0.8182 2.80 | V Q | | | |
5+15 0.8366 2.68 | V Q | | | |
5+20 0.8553 2.72 | V Q | | | |
5+25 0.8753 2.90 | V Q | | | |
5+30 0.8955 2.94 | VQ | | | |
5+35 0.9165 3.04 | V Q | | | |
5+40 0.9389 3.26 | V Q | | | |
5+45 0.9619 3.33 | V Q | | | |
5+50 0.9850 3.37 | V Q | | | |
5+55 1.0084 3.39 | V Q | | | |
6+ 0 1.0318 3.40 | V Q | | | |
6+ 5 1.0558 3.49 | V Q | | | |
6+10 1.0813 3.70 | V Q | | | |
6+15 1.1073 3.77 | V Q | | | |
6+20 1.1335 3.80 | V Q | | | |
6+25 1.1597 3.81 | V Q | | | |
6+30 1.1861 3.82 | V Q | | | |
6+35 1.2130 3.92 | V Q | | | |
6+40 1.2415 4.13 | V Q | | | |
6+45 1.2704 4.19 | V Q | | | |
6+50 1.2995 4.22 | V Q | | | |
6+55 1.3287 4.24 | V Q | | | |
7+ 0 1.3580 4.25 | V Q | | | |
7+ 5 1.3873 4.26 | V Q | | | |
7+10 1.4166 4.26 | V Q | | | |
7+15 1.4460 4.26 | V Q | | | |
7+20 1.4759 4.35 | V Q | | | |
7+25 1.5073 4.56 | V Q| | | |
7+30 1.5392 4.62 | V Q| | | |
7+35 1.5718 4.74 | V Q| | | |
7+40 1.6060 4.96 | V Q| | | |
7+45 1.6406 5.04 | V Q | | |
7+50 1.6762 5.16 | V Q | | |
7+55 1.7133 5.39 | V Q | | |
8+ 0 1.7509 5.46 | V Q | | |
8+ 5 1.7900 5.67 | V |Q | | |
8+10 1.8320 6.11 | V | Q | | |
8+15 1.8751 6.25 | V | Q | | |
8+20 1.9185 6.31 | V | Q | | |
8+25 1.9623 6.35 | V | Q | | |
8+30 2.0061 6.37 | V| Q | | |
8+35 2.0507 6.47 | V| Q | | |
8+40 2.0968 6.69 | V| Q | | |
8+45 2.1433 6.75 | V| Q | | |
8+50 2.1906 6.87 | V| Q | | |
8+55 2.2394 7.09 | V Q | | |
9+ 0 2.2888 7.17 | V Q | | |
9+ 5 2.3396 7.38 | V Q | | |
9+10 2.3934 7.81 | V Q | | |
9+15 2.4482 7.95 | |V Q | | |
9+20 2.5040 8.10 | |V Q | | |
9+25 2.5615 8.35 | |V Q | | |
9+30 2.6196 8.43 | |V Q | | |
9+35 2.6786 8.56 | | V Q | | |
9+40 2.7391 8.80 | | V Q | | |
9+45 2.8002 8.87 | | V Q | | |
9+50 2.8622 8.99 | | V Q | | |
9+55 2.9257 9.22 | | V Q | | |
10+ 0 2.9898 9.30 | | V Q | | |
10+ 5 3.0498 8.72 | | V Q | | |
10+10 3.1000 7.29 | | Q | | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2084 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR224
10+15 3.1472 6.85 | | QV | | |
10+20 3.1930 6.65 | | QV | | |
10+25 3.2381 6.55 | | QV | | |
10+30 3.2826 6.47 | | Q V | | |
10+35 3.3299 6.87 | | Q V | | |
10+40 3.3841 7.87 | | Q | | |
10+45 3.4405 8.19 | | VQ | | |
10+50 3.4979 8.33 | | VQ | | |
10+55 3.5559 8.42 | | Q | | |
11+ 0 3.6142 8.47 | | Q | | |
11+ 5 3.6721 8.41 | | Q | | |
11+10 3.7288 8.23 | | Q | | |
11+15 3.7850 8.16 | | QV | | |
11+20 3.8411 8.14 | | QV | | |
11+25 3.8970 8.12 | | QV | | |
11+30 3.9528 8.11 | | QV | | |
11+35 4.0074 7.93 | | Q V | | |
11+40 4.0591 7.51 | | Q V | | |
11+45 4.1099 7.38 | | Q V | | |
11+50 4.1610 7.41 | | Q V | | |
11+55 4.2132 7.58 | | Q V| | |
12+ 0 4.2657 7.63 | | Q V| | |
12+ 5 4.3226 8.26 | | Q V| | |
12+10 4.3895 9.72 | | Q| | |
12+15 4.4596 10.17 | | Q | |
12+20 4.5317 10.47 | | Q | |
12+25 4.6061 10.80 | | VQ | |
12+30 4.6814 10.93 | | |Q | |
12+35 4.7584 11.18 | | |VQ | |
12+40 4.8387 11.65 | | |V Q | |
12+45 4.9198 11.79 | | | VQ | |
12+50 5.0021 11.94 | | | VQ | |
12+55 5.0860 12.19 | | | VQ | |
13+ 0 5.1705 12.27 | | | VQ | |
13+ 5 5.2583 12.75 | | | V Q | |
13+10 5.3535 13.81 | | | V Q | |
13+15 5.4509 14.14 | | | V Q | |
13+20 5.5493 14.30 | | | V Q | |
13+25 5.6484 14.38 | | | V Q | |
13+30 5.7478 14.43 | | | V Q | |
13+35 5.8407 13.50 | | | Q | |
13+40 5.9182 11.24 | | | Q V | |
13+45 5.9908 10.54 | | |Q V | |
13+50 6.0611 10.22 | | Q V | |
13+55 6.1303 10.04 | | Q V | |
14+ 0 6.1987 9.93 | | Q| V | |
14+ 5 6.2690 10.21 | | Q V | |
14+10 6.3446 10.98 | | |Q V | |
14+15 6.4220 11.24 | | | Q V| |
14+20 6.4996 11.27 | | | Q V| |
14+25 6.5763 11.12 | | | Q V| |
14+30 6.6527 11.10 | | | Q V |
14+35 6.7292 11.10 | | | Q V |
14+40 6.8056 11.10 | | | Q V |
14+45 6.8820 11.09 | | | Q |V |
14+50 6.9578 11.00 | | |Q |V |
14+55 7.0321 10.79 | | |Q |V |
15+ 0 7.1059 10.72 | | |Q | V |
15+ 5 7.1789 10.61 | | |Q | V |
15+10 7.2504 10.38 | | Q | V |
15+15 7.3214 10.31 | | Q | V |
15+20 7.3916 10.18 | | Q | V |
15+25 7.4601 9.96 | | Q| | V |
15+30 7.5282 9.88 | | Q| | V |
15+35 7.5936 9.49 | | Q | | V |
15+40 7.6531 8.64 | | Q | | V |
15+45 7.7108 8.38 | | Q | | V |
15+50 7.7676 8.25 | | Q | | V |
15+55 7.8240 8.18 | | Q | | V |
16+ 0 7.8801 8.14 | | Q | | V |
16+ 5 7.9269 6.80 | | Q | | V |
16+10 7.9522 3.67 | Q | | | V |
16+15 7.9708 2.71 | Q | | | V |
16+20 7.9865 2.27 | Q | | | V |
16+25 8.0005 2.03 | Q | | | V |
16+30 8.0134 1.88 | Q | | | V |
16+35 8.0251 1.69 | Q | | | V |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2085 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR224
16+40 8.0348 1.41 | Q | | | V |
16+45 8.0441 1.35 | Q | | | V |
16+50 8.0531 1.32 | Q | | | V |
16+55 8.0621 1.30 | Q | | | V |
17+ 0 8.0710 1.29 | Q | | | V |
17+ 5 8.0810 1.46 | Q | | | V |
17+10 8.0939 1.87 | Q | | | V |
17+15 8.1076 2.00 | Q | | | V |
17+20 8.1218 2.06 | Q | | | V |
17+25 8.1362 2.09 | Q | | | V |
17+30 8.1507 2.11 | Q | | | V |
17+35 8.1653 2.12 | Q | | | V |
17+40 8.1800 2.13 | Q | | | V |
17+45 8.1946 2.13 | Q | | | V |
17+50 8.2087 2.04 | Q | | | V |
17+55 8.2214 1.84 | Q | | | V |
18+ 0 8.2336 1.77 | Q | | | V |
18+ 5 8.2456 1.74 | Q | | | V |
18+10 8.2575 1.73 | Q | | | V |
18+15 8.2693 1.72 | Q | | | V |
18+20 8.2810 1.71 | Q | | | V |
18+25 8.2928 1.70 | Q | | | V |
18+30 8.3045 1.70 | Q | | | V |
18+35 8.3157 1.62 | Q | | | V |
18+40 8.3254 1.41 | Q | | | V |
18+45 8.3346 1.35 | Q | | | V |
18+50 8.3431 1.23 | Q | | | V |
18+55 8.3500 1.01 | Q | | | V |
19+ 0 8.3564 0.93 |Q | | | V |
19+ 5 8.3632 0.98 |Q | | | V |
19+10 8.3713 1.17 | Q | | | V |
19+15 8.3797 1.22 | Q | | | V |
19+20 8.3889 1.33 | Q | | | V |
19+25 8.3996 1.55 | Q | | | V |
19+30 8.4108 1.63 | Q | | | V |
19+35 8.4216 1.57 | Q | | | V |
19+40 8.4312 1.39 | Q | | | V |
19+45 8.4403 1.33 | Q | | | V |
19+50 8.4488 1.22 | Q | | | V |
19+55 8.4557 1.01 | Q | | | V |
20+ 0 8.4621 0.93 |Q | | | V |
20+ 5 8.4689 0.98 |Q | | | V |
20+10 8.4769 1.17 | Q | | | V |
20+15 8.4854 1.22 | Q | | | V |
20+20 8.4939 1.25 | Q | | | V |
20+25 8.5026 1.26 | Q | | | V |
20+30 8.5113 1.27 | Q | | | V |
20+35 8.5201 1.27 | Q | | | V |
20+40 8.5289 1.28 | Q | | | V |
20+45 8.5377 1.28 | Q | | | V |
20+50 8.5459 1.19 | Q | | | V |
20+55 8.5527 0.98 |Q | | | V |
21+ 0 8.5590 0.92 |Q | | | V |
21+ 5 8.5657 0.98 |Q | | | V |
21+10 8.5738 1.17 | Q | | | V |
21+15 8.5822 1.22 | Q | | | V |
21+20 8.5902 1.16 | Q | | | V|
21+25 8.5968 0.96 |Q | | | V|
21+30 8.6031 0.91 |Q | | | V|
21+35 8.6098 0.97 |Q | | | V|
21+40 8.6178 1.17 | Q | | | V|
21+45 8.6262 1.22 | Q | | | V|
21+50 8.6342 1.16 | Q | | | V|
21+55 8.6408 0.96 |Q | | | V|
22+ 0 8.6471 0.91 |Q | | | V|
22+ 5 8.6538 0.97 |Q | | | V|
22+10 8.6619 1.17 | Q | | | V|
22+15 8.6703 1.22 | Q | | | V|
22+20 8.6782 1.16 | Q | | | V|
22+25 8.6849 0.96 |Q | | | V|
22+30 8.6911 0.91 |Q | | | V|
22+35 8.6972 0.89 |Q | | | V|
22+40 8.7032 0.87 |Q | | | V|
22+45 8.7092 0.86 |Q | | | V|
22+50 8.7151 0.86 |Q | | | V|
22+55 8.7210 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+ 0 8.7268 0.85 |Q | | | V|
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2086 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR224
23+ 5 8.7327 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+10 8.7386 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+15 8.7444 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+20 8.7503 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+25 8.7562 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+30 8.7621 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+35 8.7679 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+40 8.7738 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+45 8.7797 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+50 8.7855 0.85 |Q | | | V|
23+55 8.7914 0.85 |Q | | | V|
24+ 0 8.7973 0.85 |Q | | | V|
24+ 5 8.8019 0.68 |Q | | | V|
24+10 8.8037 0.26 Q | | | V|
24+15 8.8047 0.13 Q | | | V|
24+20 8.8052 0.08 Q | | | V|
24+25 8.8055 0.04 Q | | | V|
24+30 8.8056 0.02 Q | | | V|
24+35 8.8057 0.01 Q | | | V
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2087 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR515
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR515.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 5-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 1 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 0.50 33.55
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.20 80.52
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 5.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 0.500(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 1.200(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 0.664(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.94 %
Adjusted average point rain = 0.664(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-1 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 36.0 0.706 0.900 0.134 1.000 0.134
Sum (F) = 0.134
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2088 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR515
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.134
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.067
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Slope of intensity-duration curve for a 1 hour storm =0.5000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 4.20 0.334 ( 0.134) 0.033 0.301
2 0.17 4.30 0.342 ( 0.134) 0.034 0.308
3 0.25 5.00 0.398 ( 0.134) 0.040 0.358
4 0.33 5.00 0.398 ( 0.134) 0.040 0.358
5 0.42 5.80 0.462 ( 0.134) 0.046 0.416
6 0.50 6.50 0.518 ( 0.134) 0.052 0.466
7 0.58 7.40 0.589 ( 0.134) 0.059 0.530
8 0.67 8.60 0.685 ( 0.134) 0.068 0.616
9 0.75 12.30 0.979 ( 0.134) 0.098 0.881
10 0.83 29.10 2.317 0.134 ( 0.232) 2.183
11 0.92 6.80 0.541 ( 0.134) 0.054 0.487
12 1.00 5.00 0.398 ( 0.134) 0.040 0.358
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 7.3
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 0.61(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 3.4(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.06(In)
Total soil loss = 0.326(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 0.66(In)
Flood volume = 147441.8 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 14181.9 Cubic Feet
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 93.308(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 25.0 50.0 75.0 100.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0289 4.20 VQ | | | |
0+10 0.1268 14.21 |V Q | | | |
0+15 0.2521 18.20 | V Q | | | |
0+20 0.3989 21.31 | V Q | | | |
0+25 0.5602 23.43 | V Q| | | |
0+30 0.7445 26.76 | V Q | | |
0+35 0.9534 30.33 | |VQ | | |
0+40 1.1928 34.76 | | QV | | |
0+45 1.4847 42.38 | | QV | | |
0+50 1.9716 70.70 | | | V Q | |
0+55 2.6142 93.31 | | | V Q |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2089 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR515
1+ 0 2.9620 50.50 | | Q | V |
1+ 5 3.1755 31.00 | | Q | | V |
1+10 3.2719 13.99 | Q | | | V |
1+15 3.3262 7.88 | Q | | | V|
1+20 3.3579 4.61 |Q | | | V|
1+25 3.3776 2.86 |Q | | | V|
1+30 3.3828 0.75 Q | | | V|
1+35 3.3848 0.29 Q | | | V
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2090 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR535
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR535.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 5-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 3 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 0.80 53.68
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.86 124.81
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 5.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 0.800(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 1.860(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 1.048(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.97 %
Adjusted average point rain = 1.048(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-1 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 36.0 0.706 0.900 0.134 1.000 0.134
Sum (F) = 0.134
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2091 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR535
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.134
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.067
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 1.30 0.163 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.147
2 0.17 1.30 0.163 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.147
3 0.25 1.10 0.138 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.124
4 0.33 1.50 0.189 ( 0.134) 0.019 0.170
5 0.42 1.50 0.189 ( 0.134) 0.019 0.170
6 0.50 1.80 0.226 ( 0.134) 0.023 0.204
7 0.58 1.50 0.189 ( 0.134) 0.019 0.170
8 0.67 1.80 0.226 ( 0.134) 0.023 0.204
9 0.75 1.80 0.226 ( 0.134) 0.023 0.204
10 0.83 1.50 0.189 ( 0.134) 0.019 0.170
11 0.92 1.60 0.201 ( 0.134) 0.020 0.181
12 1.00 1.80 0.226 ( 0.134) 0.023 0.204
13 1.08 2.20 0.277 ( 0.134) 0.028 0.249
14 1.17 2.20 0.277 ( 0.134) 0.028 0.249
15 1.25 2.20 0.277 ( 0.134) 0.028 0.249
16 1.33 2.00 0.252 ( 0.134) 0.025 0.226
17 1.42 2.60 0.327 ( 0.134) 0.033 0.294
18 1.50 2.70 0.340 ( 0.134) 0.034 0.306
19 1.58 2.40 0.302 ( 0.134) 0.030 0.272
20 1.67 2.70 0.340 ( 0.134) 0.034 0.306
21 1.75 3.30 0.415 ( 0.134) 0.041 0.373
22 1.83 3.10 0.390 ( 0.134) 0.039 0.351
23 1.92 2.90 0.365 ( 0.134) 0.036 0.328
24 2.00 3.00 0.377 ( 0.134) 0.038 0.340
25 2.08 3.10 0.390 ( 0.134) 0.039 0.351
26 2.17 4.20 0.528 ( 0.134) 0.053 0.475
27 2.25 5.00 0.629 ( 0.134) 0.063 0.566
28 2.33 3.50 0.440 ( 0.134) 0.044 0.396
29 2.42 6.80 0.855 ( 0.134) 0.086 0.770
30 2.50 7.30 0.918 ( 0.134) 0.092 0.826
31 2.58 8.20 1.031 ( 0.134) 0.103 0.928
32 2.67 5.90 0.742 ( 0.134) 0.074 0.668
33 2.75 2.00 0.252 ( 0.134) 0.025 0.226
34 2.83 1.80 0.226 ( 0.134) 0.023 0.204
35 2.92 1.80 0.226 ( 0.134) 0.023 0.204
36 3.00 0.60 0.075 ( 0.134) 0.008 0.068
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 11.3
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 0.94(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 5.3(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.10(In)
Total soil loss = 0.586(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 1.05(In)
Flood volume = 229731.5 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 25525.7 Cubic Feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2092 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR535
Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 54.514(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 15.0 30.0 45.0 60.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0141 2.05 VQ | | | |
0+10 0.0616 6.90 V Q | | | |
0+15 0.1172 8.07 V Q | | | |
0+20 0.1767 8.64 |V Q | | | |
0+25 0.2475 10.28 |V Q | | | |
0+30 0.3257 11.35 | V Q | | | |
0+35 0.4103 12.29 | V Q | | | |
0+40 0.4943 12.19 | V Q | | | |
0+45 0.5850 13.17 | V Q | | | |
0+50 0.6745 13.00 | V Q | | | |
0+55 0.7585 12.20 | V Q | | | |
1+ 0 0.8454 12.61 | V Q | | | |
1+ 5 0.9418 14.00 | V Q| | | |
1+10 1.0498 15.69 | V Q | | |
1+15 1.1617 16.25 | V Q | | |
1+20 1.2732 16.19 | VQ | | |
1+25 1.3870 16.53 | VQ | | |
1+30 1.5165 18.80 | |VQ | | |
1+35 1.6497 19.34 | | Q | | |
1+40 1.7813 19.11 | | QV | | |
1+45 1.9260 21.02 | | Q | | |
1+50 2.0861 23.24 | | Q | | |
1+55 2.2446 23.01 | | Q V | | |
2+ 0 2.4002 22.60 | | Q V | | |
2+ 5 2.5587 23.00 | | Q V| | |
2+10 2.7321 25.18 | | Q V | |
2+15 2.9436 30.71 | | Q V | |
2+20 3.1686 32.67 | | |Q V | |
2+25 3.4013 33.78 | | | Q V | |
2+30 3.7174 45.90 | | | V Q |
2+35 4.0800 52.65 | | | V Q |
2+40 4.4554 54.51 | | | | V Q |
2+45 4.7444 41.95 | | | Q | V |
2+50 4.9206 25.60 | | Q | | V |
2+55 5.0567 19.76 | | Q | | V |
3+ 0 5.1632 15.46 | Q | | V|
3+ 5 5.2219 8.52 | Q | | | V|
3+10 5.2490 3.95 | Q | | | V|
3+15 5.2624 1.94 |Q | | | V|
3+20 5.2686 0.90 Q | | | V|
3+25 5.2719 0.48 Q | | | V|
3+30 5.2735 0.23 Q | | | V|
3+35 5.2739 0.06 Q | | | V
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2093 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR565
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR565.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 5-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 6 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.15 77.16
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 2.50 167.75
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 5.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 1.150(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 2.500(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 1.466(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.98 %
Adjusted average point rain = 1.466(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-1 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 36.0 0.706 0.900 0.134 1.000 0.134
Sum (F) = 0.134
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2094 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR565
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.134
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.067
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 0.50 0.088 ( 0.134) 0.009 0.079
2 0.17 0.60 0.106 ( 0.134) 0.011 0.095
3 0.25 0.60 0.106 ( 0.134) 0.011 0.095
4 0.33 0.60 0.106 ( 0.134) 0.011 0.095
5 0.42 0.60 0.106 ( 0.134) 0.011 0.095
6 0.50 0.70 0.123 ( 0.134) 0.012 0.111
7 0.58 0.70 0.123 ( 0.134) 0.012 0.111
8 0.67 0.70 0.123 ( 0.134) 0.012 0.111
9 0.75 0.70 0.123 ( 0.134) 0.012 0.111
10 0.83 0.70 0.123 ( 0.134) 0.012 0.111
11 0.92 0.70 0.123 ( 0.134) 0.012 0.111
12 1.00 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
13 1.08 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
14 1.17 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
15 1.25 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
16 1.33 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
17 1.42 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
18 1.50 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
19 1.58 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
20 1.67 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
21 1.75 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
22 1.83 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
23 1.92 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
24 2.00 0.90 0.158 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.142
25 2.08 0.80 0.141 ( 0.134) 0.014 0.127
26 2.17 0.90 0.158 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.142
27 2.25 0.90 0.158 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.142
28 2.33 0.90 0.158 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.142
29 2.42 0.90 0.158 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.142
30 2.50 0.90 0.158 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.142
31 2.58 0.90 0.158 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.142
32 2.67 0.90 0.158 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.142
33 2.75 1.00 0.176 ( 0.134) 0.018 0.158
34 2.83 1.00 0.176 ( 0.134) 0.018 0.158
35 2.92 1.00 0.176 ( 0.134) 0.018 0.158
36 3.00 1.00 0.176 ( 0.134) 0.018 0.158
37 3.08 1.00 0.176 ( 0.134) 0.018 0.158
38 3.17 1.10 0.193 ( 0.134) 0.019 0.174
39 3.25 1.10 0.193 ( 0.134) 0.019 0.174
40 3.33 1.10 0.193 ( 0.134) 0.019 0.174
41 3.42 1.20 0.211 ( 0.134) 0.021 0.190
42 3.50 1.30 0.229 ( 0.134) 0.023 0.206
43 3.58 1.40 0.246 ( 0.134) 0.025 0.222
44 3.67 1.40 0.246 ( 0.134) 0.025 0.222
45 3.75 1.50 0.264 ( 0.134) 0.026 0.237
46 3.83 1.50 0.264 ( 0.134) 0.026 0.237
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2095 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR565
47 3.92 1.60 0.281 ( 0.134) 0.028 0.253
48 4.00 1.60 0.281 ( 0.134) 0.028 0.253
49 4.08 1.70 0.299 ( 0.134) 0.030 0.269
50 4.17 1.80 0.317 ( 0.134) 0.032 0.285
51 4.25 1.90 0.334 ( 0.134) 0.033 0.301
52 4.33 2.00 0.352 ( 0.134) 0.035 0.317
53 4.42 2.10 0.369 ( 0.134) 0.037 0.332
54 4.50 2.10 0.369 ( 0.134) 0.037 0.332
55 4.58 2.20 0.387 ( 0.134) 0.039 0.348
56 4.67 2.30 0.405 ( 0.134) 0.040 0.364
57 4.75 2.40 0.422 ( 0.134) 0.042 0.380
58 4.83 2.40 0.422 ( 0.134) 0.042 0.380
59 4.92 2.50 0.440 ( 0.134) 0.044 0.396
60 5.00 2.60 0.457 ( 0.134) 0.046 0.412
61 5.08 3.10 0.545 ( 0.134) 0.055 0.491
62 5.17 3.60 0.633 ( 0.134) 0.063 0.570
63 5.25 3.90 0.686 ( 0.134) 0.069 0.617
64 5.33 4.20 0.739 ( 0.134) 0.074 0.665
65 5.42 4.70 0.827 ( 0.134) 0.083 0.744
66 5.50 5.60 0.985 ( 0.134) 0.099 0.887
67 5.58 1.90 0.334 ( 0.134) 0.033 0.301
68 5.67 0.90 0.158 ( 0.134) 0.016 0.142
69 5.75 0.60 0.106 ( 0.134) 0.011 0.095
70 5.83 0.50 0.088 ( 0.134) 0.009 0.079
71 5.92 0.30 0.053 ( 0.134) 0.005 0.047
72 6.00 0.20 0.035 ( 0.134) 0.004 0.032
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 15.8
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 1.32(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 7.4(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.15(In)
Total soil loss = 0.820(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 1.47(In)
Flood volume = 321340.5 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 35704.5 Cubic Feet
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 49.464(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 12.5 25.0 37.5 50.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0076 1.10 Q | | | |
0+10 0.0347 3.93 V Q | | | |
0+15 0.0709 5.26 V Q | | | |
0+20 0.1107 5.78 V Q | | | |
0+25 0.1524 6.06 V Q | | | |
0+30 0.1968 6.45 |V Q | | | |
0+35 0.2456 7.08 |V Q | | | |
0+40 0.2960 7.32 |V Q | | | |
0+45 0.3469 7.40 |V Q | | | |
0+50 0.3982 7.44 | V Q | | | |
0+55 0.4496 7.47 | V Q | | | |
1+ 0 0.5027 7.71 | V Q | | | |
1+ 5 0.5595 8.24 | V Q | | | |
1+10 0.6173 8.40 | V Q | | | |
1+15 0.6757 8.47 | V Q | | | |
1+20 0.7343 8.51 | V Q | | | |
1+25 0.7931 8.54 | V Q | | | |
1+30 0.8521 8.56 | V Q | | | |
1+35 0.9111 8.57 | V Q | | | |
1+40 0.9701 8.57 | VQ | | | |
1+45 1.0291 8.57 | VQ | | | |
1+50 1.0881 8.57 | VQ | | | |
1+55 1.1471 8.57 | Q | | | |
2+ 0 1.2077 8.79 | VQ | | | |
2+ 5 1.2703 9.09 | VQ | | | |
2+10 1.3319 8.95 | Q | | | |
2+15 1.3965 9.38 | Q | | | |
2+20 1.4621 9.51 | Q | | | |
2+25 1.5280 9.57 | QV | | | |
2+30 1.5941 9.60 | QV | | | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2096 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR565
2+35 1.6604 9.62 | Q V| | | |
2+40 1.7267 9.63 | Q V| | | |
2+45 1.7946 9.86 | Q V| | | |
2+50 1.8661 10.38 | Q V | | |
2+55 1.9387 10.54 | Q V | | |
3+ 0 2.0118 10.62 | Q V | | |
3+ 5 2.0852 10.66 | Q |V | | |
3+10 2.1603 10.90 | Q |V | | |
3+15 2.2391 11.44 | Q| V | | |
3+20 2.3191 11.61 | Q| V | | |
3+25 2.4011 11.91 | Q| V | | |
3+30 2.4885 12.69 | Q V | | |
3+35 2.5823 13.62 | Q V | | |
3+40 2.6814 14.39 | |Q V | | |
3+45 2.7840 14.90 | |Q V | | |
3+50 2.8912 15.56 | | Q V | | |
3+55 3.0015 16.02 | | Q V | | |
4+ 0 3.1163 16.67 | | Q V | | |
4+ 5 3.2343 17.12 | | Q V | | |
4+10 3.3581 17.98 | | Q V | | |
4+15 3.4885 18.94 | | Q V | | |
4+20 3.6259 19.95 | | Q V| | |
4+25 3.7704 20.98 | | Q V | |
4+30 3.9207 21.82 | | Q |V | |
4+35 4.0746 22.35 | | Q | V | |
4+40 4.2348 23.27 | | Q | V | |
4+45 4.4020 24.26 | | Q| V | |
4+50 4.5746 25.07 | | Q V | |
4+55 4.7509 25.60 | | Q V | |
5+ 0 4.9334 26.49 | | |Q V | |
5+ 5 5.1287 28.36 | | | Q V | |
5+10 5.3515 32.36 | | | Q V| |
5+15 5.6034 36.57 | | | QV |
5+20 5.8792 40.05 | | | |VQ |
5+25 6.1809 43.81 | | | | V Q |
5+30 6.5216 49.46 | | | | V Q|
5+35 6.8477 47.35 | | | | Q |
5+40 7.0406 28.01 | | | Q | V |
5+45 7.1594 17.24 | | Q | | V |
5+50 7.2402 11.73 | Q| | | V|
5+55 7.2980 8.40 | Q | | | V|
6+ 0 7.3366 5.59 | Q | | | V|
6+ 5 7.3599 3.39 | Q | | | V|
6+10 7.3688 1.29 |Q | | | V|
6+15 7.3730 0.61 Q | | | V|
6+20 7.3752 0.32 Q | | | V|
6+25 7.3763 0.16 Q | | | V|
6+30 7.3768 0.07 Q | | | V|
6+35 7.3770 0.03 Q | | | V
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2097 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR5245.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 5-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 24 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.75 117.42
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 4.50 301.95
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 5.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 1.750(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 4.500(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 2.394(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.99 %
Adjusted average point rain = 2.394(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-1 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 36.0 0.706 0.900 0.134 1.000 0.134
Sum (F) = 0.134
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2098 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.134
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.067
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 0.07 0.019 ( 0.238) 0.002 0.017
2 0.17 0.07 0.019 ( 0.237) 0.002 0.017
3 0.25 0.07 0.019 ( 0.236) 0.002 0.017
4 0.33 0.10 0.029 ( 0.235) 0.003 0.026
5 0.42 0.10 0.029 ( 0.234) 0.003 0.026
6 0.50 0.10 0.029 ( 0.233) 0.003 0.026
7 0.58 0.10 0.029 ( 0.232) 0.003 0.026
8 0.67 0.10 0.029 ( 0.231) 0.003 0.026
9 0.75 0.10 0.029 ( 0.230) 0.003 0.026
10 0.83 0.13 0.038 ( 0.230) 0.004 0.034
11 0.92 0.13 0.038 ( 0.229) 0.004 0.034
12 1.00 0.13 0.038 ( 0.228) 0.004 0.034
13 1.08 0.10 0.029 ( 0.227) 0.003 0.026
14 1.17 0.10 0.029 ( 0.226) 0.003 0.026
15 1.25 0.10 0.029 ( 0.225) 0.003 0.026
16 1.33 0.10 0.029 ( 0.224) 0.003 0.026
17 1.42 0.10 0.029 ( 0.223) 0.003 0.026
18 1.50 0.10 0.029 ( 0.222) 0.003 0.026
19 1.58 0.10 0.029 ( 0.222) 0.003 0.026
20 1.67 0.10 0.029 ( 0.221) 0.003 0.026
21 1.75 0.10 0.029 ( 0.220) 0.003 0.026
22 1.83 0.13 0.038 ( 0.219) 0.004 0.034
23 1.92 0.13 0.038 ( 0.218) 0.004 0.034
24 2.00 0.13 0.038 ( 0.217) 0.004 0.034
25 2.08 0.13 0.038 ( 0.216) 0.004 0.034
26 2.17 0.13 0.038 ( 0.215) 0.004 0.034
27 2.25 0.13 0.038 ( 0.214) 0.004 0.034
28 2.33 0.13 0.038 ( 0.214) 0.004 0.034
29 2.42 0.13 0.038 ( 0.213) 0.004 0.034
30 2.50 0.13 0.038 ( 0.212) 0.004 0.034
31 2.58 0.17 0.048 ( 0.211) 0.005 0.043
32 2.67 0.17 0.048 ( 0.210) 0.005 0.043
33 2.75 0.17 0.048 ( 0.209) 0.005 0.043
34 2.83 0.17 0.048 ( 0.208) 0.005 0.043
35 2.92 0.17 0.048 ( 0.208) 0.005 0.043
36 3.00 0.17 0.048 ( 0.207) 0.005 0.043
37 3.08 0.17 0.048 ( 0.206) 0.005 0.043
38 3.17 0.17 0.048 ( 0.205) 0.005 0.043
39 3.25 0.17 0.048 ( 0.204) 0.005 0.043
40 3.33 0.17 0.048 ( 0.203) 0.005 0.043
41 3.42 0.17 0.048 ( 0.202) 0.005 0.043
42 3.50 0.17 0.048 ( 0.202) 0.005 0.043
43 3.58 0.17 0.048 ( 0.201) 0.005 0.043
44 3.67 0.17 0.048 ( 0.200) 0.005 0.043
45 3.75 0.17 0.048 ( 0.199) 0.005 0.043
46 3.83 0.20 0.057 ( 0.198) 0.006 0.052
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2099 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
47 3.92 0.20 0.057 ( 0.197) 0.006 0.052
48 4.00 0.20 0.057 ( 0.197) 0.006 0.052
49 4.08 0.20 0.057 ( 0.196) 0.006 0.052
50 4.17 0.20 0.057 ( 0.195) 0.006 0.052
51 4.25 0.20 0.057 ( 0.194) 0.006 0.052
52 4.33 0.23 0.067 ( 0.193) 0.007 0.060
53 4.42 0.23 0.067 ( 0.192) 0.007 0.060
54 4.50 0.23 0.067 ( 0.192) 0.007 0.060
55 4.58 0.23 0.067 ( 0.191) 0.007 0.060
56 4.67 0.23 0.067 ( 0.190) 0.007 0.060
57 4.75 0.23 0.067 ( 0.189) 0.007 0.060
58 4.83 0.27 0.077 ( 0.188) 0.008 0.069
59 4.92 0.27 0.077 ( 0.187) 0.008 0.069
60 5.00 0.27 0.077 ( 0.187) 0.008 0.069
61 5.08 0.20 0.057 ( 0.186) 0.006 0.052
62 5.17 0.20 0.057 ( 0.185) 0.006 0.052
63 5.25 0.20 0.057 ( 0.184) 0.006 0.052
64 5.33 0.23 0.067 ( 0.183) 0.007 0.060
65 5.42 0.23 0.067 ( 0.183) 0.007 0.060
66 5.50 0.23 0.067 ( 0.182) 0.007 0.060
67 5.58 0.27 0.077 ( 0.181) 0.008 0.069
68 5.67 0.27 0.077 ( 0.180) 0.008 0.069
69 5.75 0.27 0.077 ( 0.179) 0.008 0.069
70 5.83 0.27 0.077 ( 0.179) 0.008 0.069
71 5.92 0.27 0.077 ( 0.178) 0.008 0.069
72 6.00 0.27 0.077 ( 0.177) 0.008 0.069
73 6.08 0.30 0.086 ( 0.176) 0.009 0.078
74 6.17 0.30 0.086 ( 0.175) 0.009 0.078
75 6.25 0.30 0.086 ( 0.175) 0.009 0.078
76 6.33 0.30 0.086 ( 0.174) 0.009 0.078
77 6.42 0.30 0.086 ( 0.173) 0.009 0.078
78 6.50 0.30 0.086 ( 0.172) 0.009 0.078
79 6.58 0.33 0.096 ( 0.172) 0.010 0.086
80 6.67 0.33 0.096 ( 0.171) 0.010 0.086
81 6.75 0.33 0.096 ( 0.170) 0.010 0.086
82 6.83 0.33 0.096 ( 0.169) 0.010 0.086
83 6.92 0.33 0.096 ( 0.169) 0.010 0.086
84 7.00 0.33 0.096 ( 0.168) 0.010 0.086
85 7.08 0.33 0.096 ( 0.167) 0.010 0.086
86 7.17 0.33 0.096 ( 0.166) 0.010 0.086
87 7.25 0.33 0.096 ( 0.165) 0.010 0.086
88 7.33 0.37 0.105 ( 0.165) 0.011 0.095
89 7.42 0.37 0.105 ( 0.164) 0.011 0.095
90 7.50 0.37 0.105 ( 0.163) 0.011 0.095
91 7.58 0.40 0.115 ( 0.162) 0.011 0.103
92 7.67 0.40 0.115 ( 0.162) 0.011 0.103
93 7.75 0.40 0.115 ( 0.161) 0.011 0.103
94 7.83 0.43 0.124 ( 0.160) 0.012 0.112
95 7.92 0.43 0.124 ( 0.159) 0.012 0.112
96 8.00 0.43 0.124 ( 0.159) 0.012 0.112
97 8.08 0.50 0.144 ( 0.158) 0.014 0.129
98 8.17 0.50 0.144 ( 0.157) 0.014 0.129
99 8.25 0.50 0.144 ( 0.157) 0.014 0.129
100 8.33 0.50 0.144 ( 0.156) 0.014 0.129
101 8.42 0.50 0.144 ( 0.155) 0.014 0.129
102 8.50 0.50 0.144 ( 0.154) 0.014 0.129
103 8.58 0.53 0.153 ( 0.154) 0.015 0.138
104 8.67 0.53 0.153 ( 0.153) 0.015 0.138
105 8.75 0.53 0.153 ( 0.152) 0.015 0.138
106 8.83 0.57 0.163 ( 0.151) 0.016 0.147
107 8.92 0.57 0.163 ( 0.151) 0.016 0.147
108 9.00 0.57 0.163 ( 0.150) 0.016 0.147
109 9.08 0.63 0.182 ( 0.149) 0.018 0.164
110 9.17 0.63 0.182 ( 0.149) 0.018 0.164
111 9.25 0.63 0.182 ( 0.148) 0.018 0.164
112 9.33 0.67 0.192 ( 0.147) 0.019 0.172
113 9.42 0.67 0.192 ( 0.147) 0.019 0.172
114 9.50 0.67 0.192 ( 0.146) 0.019 0.172
115 9.58 0.70 0.201 ( 0.145) 0.020 0.181
116 9.67 0.70 0.201 ( 0.144) 0.020 0.181
117 9.75 0.70 0.201 ( 0.144) 0.020 0.181
118 9.83 0.73 0.211 ( 0.143) 0.021 0.190
119 9.92 0.73 0.211 ( 0.142) 0.021 0.190
120 10.00 0.73 0.211 ( 0.142) 0.021 0.190
121 10.08 0.50 0.144 ( 0.141) 0.014 0.129
122 10.17 0.50 0.144 ( 0.140) 0.014 0.129
123 10.25 0.50 0.144 ( 0.140) 0.014 0.129
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2100 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
124 10.33 0.50 0.144 ( 0.139) 0.014 0.129
125 10.42 0.50 0.144 ( 0.138) 0.014 0.129
126 10.50 0.50 0.144 ( 0.138) 0.014 0.129
127 10.58 0.67 0.192 ( 0.137) 0.019 0.172
128 10.67 0.67 0.192 ( 0.136) 0.019 0.172
129 10.75 0.67 0.192 ( 0.136) 0.019 0.172
130 10.83 0.67 0.192 ( 0.135) 0.019 0.172
131 10.92 0.67 0.192 ( 0.134) 0.019 0.172
132 11.00 0.67 0.192 ( 0.134) 0.019 0.172
133 11.08 0.63 0.182 ( 0.133) 0.018 0.164
134 11.17 0.63 0.182 ( 0.132) 0.018 0.164
135 11.25 0.63 0.182 ( 0.132) 0.018 0.164
136 11.33 0.63 0.182 ( 0.131) 0.018 0.164
137 11.42 0.63 0.182 ( 0.130) 0.018 0.164
138 11.50 0.63 0.182 ( 0.130) 0.018 0.164
139 11.58 0.57 0.163 ( 0.129) 0.016 0.147
140 11.67 0.57 0.163 ( 0.128) 0.016 0.147
141 11.75 0.57 0.163 ( 0.128) 0.016 0.147
142 11.83 0.60 0.172 ( 0.127) 0.017 0.155
143 11.92 0.60 0.172 ( 0.126) 0.017 0.155
144 12.00 0.60 0.172 ( 0.126) 0.017 0.155
145 12.08 0.83 0.239 ( 0.125) 0.024 0.215
146 12.17 0.83 0.239 ( 0.125) 0.024 0.215
147 12.25 0.83 0.239 ( 0.124) 0.024 0.215
148 12.33 0.87 0.249 ( 0.123) 0.025 0.224
149 12.42 0.87 0.249 ( 0.123) 0.025 0.224
150 12.50 0.87 0.249 ( 0.122) 0.025 0.224
151 12.58 0.93 0.268 ( 0.121) 0.027 0.241
152 12.67 0.93 0.268 ( 0.121) 0.027 0.241
153 12.75 0.93 0.268 ( 0.120) 0.027 0.241
154 12.83 0.97 0.278 ( 0.120) 0.028 0.250
155 12.92 0.97 0.278 ( 0.119) 0.028 0.250
156 13.00 0.97 0.278 ( 0.118) 0.028 0.250
157 13.08 1.13 0.326 ( 0.118) 0.033 0.293
158 13.17 1.13 0.326 ( 0.117) 0.033 0.293
159 13.25 1.13 0.326 ( 0.117) 0.033 0.293
160 13.33 1.13 0.326 ( 0.116) 0.033 0.293
161 13.42 1.13 0.326 ( 0.115) 0.033 0.293
162 13.50 1.13 0.326 ( 0.115) 0.033 0.293
163 13.58 0.77 0.220 ( 0.114) 0.022 0.198
164 13.67 0.77 0.220 ( 0.114) 0.022 0.198
165 13.75 0.77 0.220 ( 0.113) 0.022 0.198
166 13.83 0.77 0.220 ( 0.113) 0.022 0.198
167 13.92 0.77 0.220 ( 0.112) 0.022 0.198
168 14.00 0.77 0.220 ( 0.111) 0.022 0.198
169 14.08 0.90 0.259 ( 0.111) 0.026 0.233
170 14.17 0.90 0.259 ( 0.110) 0.026 0.233
171 14.25 0.90 0.259 ( 0.110) 0.026 0.233
172 14.33 0.87 0.249 ( 0.109) 0.025 0.224
173 14.42 0.87 0.249 ( 0.109) 0.025 0.224
174 14.50 0.87 0.249 ( 0.108) 0.025 0.224
175 14.58 0.87 0.249 ( 0.107) 0.025 0.224
176 14.67 0.87 0.249 ( 0.107) 0.025 0.224
177 14.75 0.87 0.249 ( 0.106) 0.025 0.224
178 14.83 0.83 0.239 ( 0.106) 0.024 0.215
179 14.92 0.83 0.239 ( 0.105) 0.024 0.215
180 15.00 0.83 0.239 ( 0.105) 0.024 0.215
181 15.08 0.80 0.230 ( 0.104) 0.023 0.207
182 15.17 0.80 0.230 ( 0.104) 0.023 0.207
183 15.25 0.80 0.230 ( 0.103) 0.023 0.207
184 15.33 0.77 0.220 ( 0.103) 0.022 0.198
185 15.42 0.77 0.220 ( 0.102) 0.022 0.198
186 15.50 0.77 0.220 ( 0.102) 0.022 0.198
187 15.58 0.63 0.182 ( 0.101) 0.018 0.164
188 15.67 0.63 0.182 ( 0.101) 0.018 0.164
189 15.75 0.63 0.182 ( 0.100) 0.018 0.164
190 15.83 0.63 0.182 ( 0.100) 0.018 0.164
191 15.92 0.63 0.182 ( 0.099) 0.018 0.164
192 16.00 0.63 0.182 ( 0.099) 0.018 0.164
193 16.08 0.13 0.038 ( 0.098) 0.004 0.034
194 16.17 0.13 0.038 ( 0.098) 0.004 0.034
195 16.25 0.13 0.038 ( 0.097) 0.004 0.034
196 16.33 0.13 0.038 ( 0.097) 0.004 0.034
197 16.42 0.13 0.038 ( 0.096) 0.004 0.034
198 16.50 0.13 0.038 ( 0.096) 0.004 0.034
199 16.58 0.10 0.029 ( 0.095) 0.003 0.026
200 16.67 0.10 0.029 ( 0.095) 0.003 0.026
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2101 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
201 16.75 0.10 0.029 ( 0.094) 0.003 0.026
202 16.83 0.10 0.029 ( 0.094) 0.003 0.026
203 16.92 0.10 0.029 ( 0.093) 0.003 0.026
204 17.00 0.10 0.029 ( 0.093) 0.003 0.026
205 17.08 0.17 0.048 ( 0.092) 0.005 0.043
206 17.17 0.17 0.048 ( 0.092) 0.005 0.043
207 17.25 0.17 0.048 ( 0.091) 0.005 0.043
208 17.33 0.17 0.048 ( 0.091) 0.005 0.043
209 17.42 0.17 0.048 ( 0.090) 0.005 0.043
210 17.50 0.17 0.048 ( 0.090) 0.005 0.043
211 17.58 0.17 0.048 ( 0.089) 0.005 0.043
212 17.67 0.17 0.048 ( 0.089) 0.005 0.043
213 17.75 0.17 0.048 ( 0.089) 0.005 0.043
214 17.83 0.13 0.038 ( 0.088) 0.004 0.034
215 17.92 0.13 0.038 ( 0.088) 0.004 0.034
216 18.00 0.13 0.038 ( 0.087) 0.004 0.034
217 18.08 0.13 0.038 ( 0.087) 0.004 0.034
218 18.17 0.13 0.038 ( 0.086) 0.004 0.034
219 18.25 0.13 0.038 ( 0.086) 0.004 0.034
220 18.33 0.13 0.038 ( 0.086) 0.004 0.034
221 18.42 0.13 0.038 ( 0.085) 0.004 0.034
222 18.50 0.13 0.038 ( 0.085) 0.004 0.034
223 18.58 0.10 0.029 ( 0.084) 0.003 0.026
224 18.67 0.10 0.029 ( 0.084) 0.003 0.026
225 18.75 0.10 0.029 ( 0.084) 0.003 0.026
226 18.83 0.07 0.019 ( 0.083) 0.002 0.017
227 18.92 0.07 0.019 ( 0.083) 0.002 0.017
228 19.00 0.07 0.019 ( 0.082) 0.002 0.017
229 19.08 0.10 0.029 ( 0.082) 0.003 0.026
230 19.17 0.10 0.029 ( 0.082) 0.003 0.026
231 19.25 0.10 0.029 ( 0.081) 0.003 0.026
232 19.33 0.13 0.038 ( 0.081) 0.004 0.034
233 19.42 0.13 0.038 ( 0.080) 0.004 0.034
234 19.50 0.13 0.038 ( 0.080) 0.004 0.034
235 19.58 0.10 0.029 ( 0.080) 0.003 0.026
236 19.67 0.10 0.029 ( 0.079) 0.003 0.026
237 19.75 0.10 0.029 ( 0.079) 0.003 0.026
238 19.83 0.07 0.019 ( 0.079) 0.002 0.017
239 19.92 0.07 0.019 ( 0.078) 0.002 0.017
240 20.00 0.07 0.019 ( 0.078) 0.002 0.017
241 20.08 0.10 0.029 ( 0.078) 0.003 0.026
242 20.17 0.10 0.029 ( 0.077) 0.003 0.026
243 20.25 0.10 0.029 ( 0.077) 0.003 0.026
244 20.33 0.10 0.029 ( 0.077) 0.003 0.026
245 20.42 0.10 0.029 ( 0.076) 0.003 0.026
246 20.50 0.10 0.029 ( 0.076) 0.003 0.026
247 20.58 0.10 0.029 ( 0.076) 0.003 0.026
248 20.67 0.10 0.029 ( 0.075) 0.003 0.026
249 20.75 0.10 0.029 ( 0.075) 0.003 0.026
250 20.83 0.07 0.019 ( 0.075) 0.002 0.017
251 20.92 0.07 0.019 ( 0.074) 0.002 0.017
252 21.00 0.07 0.019 ( 0.074) 0.002 0.017
253 21.08 0.10 0.029 ( 0.074) 0.003 0.026
254 21.17 0.10 0.029 ( 0.073) 0.003 0.026
255 21.25 0.10 0.029 ( 0.073) 0.003 0.026
256 21.33 0.07 0.019 ( 0.073) 0.002 0.017
257 21.42 0.07 0.019 ( 0.073) 0.002 0.017
258 21.50 0.07 0.019 ( 0.072) 0.002 0.017
259 21.58 0.10 0.029 ( 0.072) 0.003 0.026
260 21.67 0.10 0.029 ( 0.072) 0.003 0.026
261 21.75 0.10 0.029 ( 0.072) 0.003 0.026
262 21.83 0.07 0.019 ( 0.071) 0.002 0.017
263 21.92 0.07 0.019 ( 0.071) 0.002 0.017
264 22.00 0.07 0.019 ( 0.071) 0.002 0.017
265 22.08 0.10 0.029 ( 0.071) 0.003 0.026
266 22.17 0.10 0.029 ( 0.070) 0.003 0.026
267 22.25 0.10 0.029 ( 0.070) 0.003 0.026
268 22.33 0.07 0.019 ( 0.070) 0.002 0.017
269 22.42 0.07 0.019 ( 0.070) 0.002 0.017
270 22.50 0.07 0.019 ( 0.069) 0.002 0.017
271 22.58 0.07 0.019 ( 0.069) 0.002 0.017
272 22.67 0.07 0.019 ( 0.069) 0.002 0.017
273 22.75 0.07 0.019 ( 0.069) 0.002 0.017
274 22.83 0.07 0.019 ( 0.069) 0.002 0.017
275 22.92 0.07 0.019 ( 0.069) 0.002 0.017
276 23.00 0.07 0.019 ( 0.068) 0.002 0.017
277 23.08 0.07 0.019 ( 0.068) 0.002 0.017
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2102 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
278 23.17 0.07 0.019 ( 0.068) 0.002 0.017
279 23.25 0.07 0.019 ( 0.068) 0.002 0.017
280 23.33 0.07 0.019 ( 0.068) 0.002 0.017
281 23.42 0.07 0.019 ( 0.068) 0.002 0.017
282 23.50 0.07 0.019 ( 0.068) 0.002 0.017
283 23.58 0.07 0.019 ( 0.067) 0.002 0.017
284 23.67 0.07 0.019 ( 0.067) 0.002 0.017
285 23.75 0.07 0.019 ( 0.067) 0.002 0.017
286 23.83 0.07 0.019 ( 0.067) 0.002 0.017
287 23.92 0.07 0.019 ( 0.067) 0.002 0.017
288 24.00 0.07 0.019 ( 0.067) 0.002 0.017
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 25.9
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 2.15(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 12.0(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.24(In)
Total soil loss = 1.339(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 2.39(In)
Flood volume = 524759.2 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 58306.6 Cubic Feet
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 19.746(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 24 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0017 0.24 Q | | | |
0+10 0.0072 0.81 VQ | | | |
0+15 0.0140 0.98 VQ | | | |
0+20 0.0221 1.18 V Q | | | |
0+25 0.0325 1.51 V Q | | | |
0+30 0.0437 1.63 V Q | | | |
0+35 0.0553 1.68 V Q | | | |
0+40 0.0672 1.72 V Q | | | |
0+45 0.0791 1.73 V Q | | | |
0+50 0.0919 1.86 V Q | | | |
0+55 0.1068 2.15 V Q | | | |
1+ 0 0.1222 2.24 V Q | | | |
1+ 5 0.1371 2.16 V Q | | | |
1+10 0.1501 1.90 V Q | | | |
1+15 0.1627 1.83 V Q | | | |
1+20 0.1751 1.79 V Q | | | |
1+25 0.1873 1.78 V Q | | | |
1+30 0.1995 1.76 V Q | | | |
1+35 0.2116 1.76 V Q | | | |
1+40 0.2236 1.75 V Q | | | |
1+45 0.2357 1.75 V Q | | | |
1+50 0.2485 1.87 V Q | | | |
1+55 0.2634 2.15 V Q | | | |
2+ 0 0.2788 2.24 V Q | | | |
2+ 5 0.2945 2.28 V Q | | | |
2+10 0.3104 2.30 |V Q | | | |
2+15 0.3263 2.32 |V Q | | | |
2+20 0.3423 2.33 |V Q | | | |
2+25 0.3584 2.33 |V Q | | | |
2+30 0.3745 2.33 |V Q | | | |
2+35 0.3913 2.45 |V Q | | | |
2+40 0.4102 2.74 |V Q | | | |
2+45 0.4296 2.82 |V Q | | | |
2+50 0.4494 2.86 |V Q | | | |
2+55 0.4692 2.89 |V Q | | | |
3+ 0 0.4892 2.90 |V Q | | | |
3+ 5 0.5092 2.91 |V Q | | | |
3+10 0.5293 2.92 |V Q | | | |
3+15 0.5494 2.92 |V Q | | | |
3+20 0.5695 2.92 |V Q | | | |
3+25 0.5895 2.92 |V Q | | | |
3+30 0.6096 2.92 | V Q | | | |
3+35 0.6297 2.92 | V Q | | | |
3+40 0.6498 2.92 | V Q | | | |
3+45 0.6699 2.92 | V Q | | | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2103 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
3+50 0.6908 3.04 | V Q | | | |
3+55 0.7136 3.32 | V Q | | | |
4+ 0 0.7371 3.41 | V Q | | | |
4+ 5 0.7608 3.45 | V Q | | | |
4+10 0.7847 3.47 | V Q | | | |
4+15 0.8087 3.48 | V Q | | | |
4+20 0.8336 3.61 | V Q | | | |
4+25 0.8604 3.90 | V Q | | | |
4+30 0.8879 3.99 | V Q | | | |
4+35 0.9157 4.03 | V Q | | | |
4+40 0.9436 4.05 | V Q | | | |
4+45 0.9716 4.07 | V Q | | | |
4+50 1.0005 4.19 | V Q | | | |
4+55 1.0314 4.49 | V Q | | | |
5+ 0 1.0629 4.57 | V Q| | | |
5+ 5 1.0930 4.37 | V Q | | | |
5+10 1.1193 3.83 | V Q | | | |
5+15 1.1446 3.67 | V Q | | | |
5+20 1.1702 3.72 | V Q | | | |
5+25 1.1974 3.96 | V Q | | | |
5+30 1.2251 4.02 | V Q | | | |
5+35 1.2538 4.16 | V Q | | | |
5+40 1.2845 4.46 | V Q | | | |
5+45 1.3159 4.56 | V Q| | | |
5+50 1.3476 4.61 | V Q| | | |
5+55 1.3795 4.63 | V Q| | | |
6+ 0 1.4115 4.65 | V Q| | | |
6+ 5 1.4444 4.78 | V Q| | | |
6+10 1.4794 5.07 | V Q | | |
6+15 1.5149 5.16 | V Q | | |
6+20 1.5506 5.20 | V Q | | |
6+25 1.5866 5.22 | V Q | | |
6+30 1.6226 5.23 | V Q | | |
6+35 1.6595 5.36 | V Q | | |
6+40 1.6985 5.65 | V |Q | | |
6+45 1.7380 5.74 | V |Q | | |
6+50 1.7778 5.78 | V |Q | | |
6+55 1.8177 5.80 | V |Q | | |
7+ 0 1.8578 5.82 | V |Q | | |
7+ 5 1.8979 5.82 | V |Q | | |
7+10 1.9380 5.83 | V |Q | | |
7+15 1.9782 5.83 | V |Q | | |
7+20 2.0192 5.95 | V |Q | | |
7+25 2.0621 6.23 | V | Q | | |
7+30 2.1057 6.32 | V | Q | | |
7+35 2.1503 6.48 | V | Q | | |
7+40 2.1971 6.79 | V | Q | | |
7+45 2.2445 6.89 | V | Q | | |
7+50 2.2931 7.06 | V | Q | | |
7+55 2.3439 7.37 | V | Q | | |
8+ 0 2.3953 7.47 | V | Q | | |
8+ 5 2.4488 7.76 | V | Q | | |
8+10 2.5064 8.36 | V | Q | | |
8+15 2.5652 8.55 | V | Q | | |
8+20 2.6247 8.64 | V | Q | | |
8+25 2.6845 8.69 | V | Q | | |
8+30 2.7445 8.71 | V| Q | | |
8+35 2.8055 8.85 | V| Q | | |
8+40 2.8685 9.15 | V| Q | | |
8+45 2.9321 9.24 | V| Q | | |
8+50 2.9968 9.40 | V| Q | | |
8+55 3.0637 9.70 | V Q| | |
9+ 0 3.1312 9.80 | V Q| | |
9+ 5 3.2007 10.09 | V Q | |
9+10 3.2743 10.69 | V |Q | |
9+15 3.3493 10.88 | |V |Q | |
9+20 3.4256 11.09 | |V | Q | |
9+25 3.5043 11.42 | |V | Q | |
9+30 3.5838 11.54 | |V | Q | |
9+35 3.6644 11.72 | | V | Q | |
9+40 3.7473 12.04 | | V | Q | |
9+45 3.8309 12.14 | | V | Q | |
9+50 3.9157 12.31 | | V | Q | |
9+55 4.0026 12.62 | | V | Q | |
10+ 0 4.0902 12.72 | | V | Q | |
10+ 5 4.1723 11.93 | | V | Q | |
10+10 4.2410 9.97 | | V Q| | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2104 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
10+15 4.3055 9.37 | | V Q | | |
10+20 4.3682 9.10 | | V Q | | |
10+25 4.4299 8.95 | | V Q | | |
10+30 4.4909 8.86 | | V Q | | |
10+35 4.5556 9.40 | | V Q | | |
10+40 4.6297 10.77 | | V |Q | |
10+45 4.7069 11.20 | | V | Q | |
10+50 4.7854 11.40 | | V | Q | |
10+55 4.8647 11.51 | | V | Q | |
11+ 0 4.9445 11.58 | | V | Q | |
11+ 5 5.0237 11.51 | | V | Q | |
11+10 5.1012 11.26 | | V | Q | |
11+15 5.1782 11.17 | | V | Q | |
11+20 5.2548 11.13 | | V | Q | |
11+25 5.3313 11.11 | | V | Q | |
11+30 5.4077 11.09 | | V | Q | |
11+35 5.4824 10.84 | | V |Q | |
11+40 5.5532 10.27 | | V Q | |
11+45 5.6227 10.10 | | V Q | |
11+50 5.6925 10.14 | | V Q | |
11+55 5.7640 10.38 | | VQ | |
12+ 0 5.8358 10.43 | | VQ | |
12+ 5 5.9136 11.30 | | V| Q | |
12+10 6.0052 13.29 | | V| Q | |
12+15 6.1010 13.92 | | V Q | |
12+20 6.1997 14.33 | | V Q | |
12+25 6.3014 14.77 | | V Q| |
12+30 6.4045 14.96 | | |V Q| |
12+35 6.5098 15.30 | | |V Q |
12+40 6.6196 15.94 | | |V |Q |
12+45 6.7307 16.13 | | | V | Q |
12+50 6.8432 16.34 | | | V | Q |
12+55 6.9580 16.67 | | | V | Q |
13+ 0 7.0736 16.79 | | | V | Q |
13+ 5 7.1937 17.44 | | | V | Q |
13+10 7.3239 18.90 | | | V | Q |
13+15 7.4571 19.35 | | | V | Q |
13+20 7.5918 19.56 | | | V | Q|
13+25 7.7273 19.68 | | | V | Q|
13+30 7.8633 19.75 | | | V | Q|
13+35 7.9905 18.47 | | | V | Q |
13+40 8.0964 15.38 | | | V Q |
13+45 8.1957 14.42 | | | VQ | |
13+50 8.2920 13.98 | | | Q | |
13+55 8.3867 13.74 | | | Q | |
14+ 0 8.4802 13.58 | | | QV | |
14+ 5 8.5764 13.97 | | | QV | |
14+10 8.6799 15.03 | | | V Q |
14+15 8.7858 15.38 | | | VQ |
14+20 8.8919 15.41 | | | VQ |
14+25 8.9968 15.22 | | | VQ |
14+30 9.1014 15.19 | | | Q |
14+35 9.2059 15.18 | | | Q |
14+40 9.3106 15.19 | | | Q |
14+45 9.4151 15.18 | | | QV |
14+50 9.5187 15.05 | | | QV |
14+55 9.6203 14.76 | | | Q|V |
15+ 0 9.7213 14.67 | | | Q| V |
15+ 5 9.8213 14.51 | | | Q| V |
15+10 9.9191 14.20 | | | Q | V |
15+15 10.0162 14.10 | | | Q | V |
15+20 10.1121 13.93 | | | Q | V |
15+25 10.2059 13.62 | | | Q | V |
15+30 10.2990 13.52 | | | Q | V |
15+35 10.3885 12.99 | | | Q | V |
15+40 10.4699 11.82 | | | Q | V |
15+45 10.5489 11.46 | | | Q | V |
15+50 10.6266 11.29 | | | Q | V |
15+55 10.7037 11.20 | | | Q | V |
16+ 0 10.7805 11.14 | | | Q | V |
16+ 5 10.8445 9.30 | | Q | | V |
16+10 10.8791 5.02 | Q | | V |
16+15 10.9046 3.71 | Q | | | V |
16+20 10.9261 3.11 | Q | | | V |
16+25 10.9452 2.78 | Q | | | V |
16+30 10.9629 2.57 | Q | | | V |
16+35 10.9788 2.32 | Q | | | V |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2105 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
16+40 10.9921 1.93 | Q | | | V |
16+45 11.0048 1.84 | Q | | | V |
16+50 11.0172 1.80 | Q | | | V |
16+55 11.0295 1.78 | Q | | | V |
17+ 0 11.0416 1.76 | Q | | | V |
17+ 5 11.0554 2.00 | Q | | | V |
17+10 11.0730 2.56 | Q | | | V |
17+15 11.0918 2.73 | Q | | | V |
17+20 11.1112 2.81 | Q | | | V |
17+25 11.1308 2.86 | Q | | | V |
17+30 11.1507 2.88 | Q | | | V |
17+35 11.1707 2.90 | Q | | | V |
17+40 11.1907 2.92 | Q | | | V |
17+45 11.2108 2.92 | Q | | | V |
17+50 11.2301 2.80 | Q | | | V |
17+55 11.2474 2.51 | Q | | | V |
18+ 0 11.2641 2.42 | Q | | | V |
18+ 5 11.2805 2.38 | Q | | | V |
18+10 11.2967 2.36 | Q | | | V |
18+15 11.3129 2.35 | Q | | | V |
18+20 11.3290 2.34 | Q | | | V |
18+25 11.3451 2.33 | Q | | | V |
18+30 11.3612 2.33 | Q | | | V |
18+35 11.3764 2.21 | Q | | | V |
18+40 11.3897 1.93 | Q | | | V |
18+45 11.4023 1.84 | Q | | | V |
18+50 11.4139 1.68 | Q | | | V |
18+55 11.4234 1.37 | Q | | | V |
19+ 0 11.4322 1.27 | Q | | | V |
19+ 5 11.4414 1.35 | Q | | | V |
19+10 11.4524 1.60 | Q | | | V |
19+15 11.4640 1.67 | Q | | | V |
19+20 11.4765 1.82 | Q | | | V |
19+25 11.4912 2.12 | Q | | | V |
19+30 11.5065 2.22 | Q | | | V |
19+35 11.5213 2.15 | Q | | | V |
19+40 11.5344 1.90 | Q | | | V |
19+45 11.5470 1.83 | Q | | | V |
19+50 11.5585 1.67 | Q | | | V |
19+55 11.5680 1.37 | Q | | | V |
20+ 0 11.5767 1.27 | Q | | | V |
20+ 5 11.5860 1.35 | Q | | | V |
20+10 11.5970 1.60 | Q | | | V |
20+15 11.6085 1.67 | Q | | | V |
20+20 11.6203 1.70 | Q | | | V |
20+25 11.6321 1.72 | Q | | | V |
20+30 11.6440 1.73 | Q | | | V |
20+35 11.6560 1.74 | Q | | | V |
20+40 11.6681 1.75 | Q | | | V |
20+45 11.6801 1.75 | Q | | | V |
20+50 11.6914 1.63 | Q | | | V |
20+55 11.7006 1.35 | Q | | | V |
21+ 0 11.7093 1.26 | Q | | | V |
21+ 5 11.7185 1.34 | Q | | | V |
21+10 11.7295 1.60 | Q | | | V |
21+15 11.7410 1.67 | Q | | | V |
21+20 11.7520 1.58 | Q | | | V|
21+25 11.7610 1.32 | Q | | | V|
21+30 11.7696 1.24 | Q | | | V|
21+35 11.7787 1.33 | Q | | | V|
21+40 11.7898 1.60 | Q | | | V|
21+45 11.8013 1.67 | Q | | | V|
21+50 11.8122 1.58 | Q | | | V|
21+55 11.8212 1.32 | Q | | | V|
22+ 0 11.8298 1.24 | Q | | | V|
22+ 5 11.8390 1.33 | Q | | | V|
22+10 11.8500 1.60 | Q | | | V|
22+15 11.8615 1.67 | Q | | | V|
22+20 11.8724 1.58 | Q | | | V|
22+25 11.8815 1.32 | Q | | | V|
22+30 11.8900 1.24 | Q | | | V|
22+35 11.8984 1.21 | Q | | | V|
22+40 11.9066 1.20 | Q | | | V|
22+45 11.9148 1.18 | Q | | | V|
22+50 11.9228 1.17 | Q | | | V|
22+55 11.9309 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+ 0 11.9389 1.17 | Q | | | V|
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2106 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR5245
23+ 5 11.9469 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+10 11.9550 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+15 11.9630 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+20 11.9710 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+25 11.9791 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+30 11.9871 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+35 11.9951 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+40 12.0031 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+45 12.0112 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+50 12.0192 1.17 | Q | | | V|
23+55 12.0272 1.17 | Q | | | V|
24+ 0 12.0353 1.17 | Q | | | V|
24+ 5 12.0416 0.93 |Q | | | V|
24+10 12.0441 0.36 Q | | | V|
24+15 12.0454 0.18 Q | | | V|
24+20 12.0461 0.10 Q | | | V|
24+25 12.0465 0.06 Q | | | V|
24+30 12.0467 0.03 Q | | | V|
24+35 12.0468 0.01 Q | | | V|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2107 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10110
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR10110.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 10-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 1 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 0.50 33.55
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.20 80.52
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 10.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 0.500(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 1.200(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 0.788(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.94 %
Adjusted average point rain = 0.788(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-2 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 56.0 0.511 0.900 0.097 1.000 0.097
Sum (F) = 0.097
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2108 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10110
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.097
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.049
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Slope of intensity-duration curve for a 1 hour storm =0.5000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 4.20 0.397 ( 0.097) 0.040 0.357
2 0.17 4.30 0.406 ( 0.097) 0.041 0.366
3 0.25 5.00 0.473 ( 0.097) 0.047 0.425
4 0.33 5.00 0.473 ( 0.097) 0.047 0.425
5 0.42 5.80 0.548 ( 0.097) 0.055 0.493
6 0.50 6.50 0.614 ( 0.097) 0.061 0.553
7 0.58 7.40 0.699 ( 0.097) 0.070 0.629
8 0.67 8.60 0.813 ( 0.097) 0.081 0.731
9 0.75 12.30 1.162 0.097 ( 0.116) 1.065
10 0.83 29.10 2.750 0.097 ( 0.275) 2.653
11 0.92 6.80 0.643 ( 0.097) 0.064 0.578
12 1.00 5.00 0.473 ( 0.097) 0.047 0.425
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 8.7
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 0.73(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 4.1(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.06(In)
Total soil loss = 0.348(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 0.79(In)
Flood volume = 176635.1 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 15180.3 Cubic Feet
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 112.980(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0343 4.98 Q | | | |
0+10 0.1505 16.87 |V Q | | | |
0+15 0.2992 21.60 | V Q | | | |
0+20 0.4734 25.29 | VQ | | | |
0+25 0.6649 27.80 | QV | | | |
0+30 0.8836 31.76 | Q V | | | |
0+35 1.1315 36.00 | Q |V | | |
0+40 1.4156 41.26 | Q | V | | |
0+45 1.7639 50.57 | Q V | | |
0+50 2.3521 85.41 | | Q | V | |
0+55 3.1302 112.98 | | | Q V |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2109 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10110
1+ 0 3.5479 60.65 | | Q | | V |
1+ 5 3.8036 37.13 | Q | | | V |
1+10 3.9193 16.80 | Q | | | V |
1+15 3.9845 9.47 |Q | | | V|
1+20 4.0227 5.54 |Q | | | V|
1+25 4.0464 3.44 Q | | | V|
1+30 4.0526 0.89 Q | | | V|
1+35 4.0550 0.35 Q | | | V
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2110 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10310
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR10310.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 10-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 3 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 0.80 53.68
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.86 124.81
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 10.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 0.800(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 1.860(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 1.236(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.97 %
Adjusted average point rain = 1.236(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-2 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 56.0 0.511 0.900 0.097 1.000 0.097
Sum (F) = 0.097
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2111 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10310
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.097
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.049
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 1.30 0.193 ( 0.097) 0.019 0.173
2 0.17 1.30 0.193 ( 0.097) 0.019 0.173
3 0.25 1.10 0.163 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
4 0.33 1.50 0.222 ( 0.097) 0.022 0.200
5 0.42 1.50 0.222 ( 0.097) 0.022 0.200
6 0.50 1.80 0.267 ( 0.097) 0.027 0.240
7 0.58 1.50 0.222 ( 0.097) 0.022 0.200
8 0.67 1.80 0.267 ( 0.097) 0.027 0.240
9 0.75 1.80 0.267 ( 0.097) 0.027 0.240
10 0.83 1.50 0.222 ( 0.097) 0.022 0.200
11 0.92 1.60 0.237 ( 0.097) 0.024 0.214
12 1.00 1.80 0.267 ( 0.097) 0.027 0.240
13 1.08 2.20 0.326 ( 0.097) 0.033 0.294
14 1.17 2.20 0.326 ( 0.097) 0.033 0.294
15 1.25 2.20 0.326 ( 0.097) 0.033 0.294
16 1.33 2.00 0.297 ( 0.097) 0.030 0.267
17 1.42 2.60 0.386 ( 0.097) 0.039 0.347
18 1.50 2.70 0.400 ( 0.097) 0.040 0.360
19 1.58 2.40 0.356 ( 0.097) 0.036 0.320
20 1.67 2.70 0.400 ( 0.097) 0.040 0.360
21 1.75 3.30 0.489 ( 0.097) 0.049 0.440
22 1.83 3.10 0.460 ( 0.097) 0.046 0.414
23 1.92 2.90 0.430 ( 0.097) 0.043 0.387
24 2.00 3.00 0.445 ( 0.097) 0.044 0.400
25 2.08 3.10 0.460 ( 0.097) 0.046 0.414
26 2.17 4.20 0.623 ( 0.097) 0.062 0.561
27 2.25 5.00 0.741 ( 0.097) 0.074 0.667
28 2.33 3.50 0.519 ( 0.097) 0.052 0.467
29 2.42 6.80 1.008 0.097 ( 0.101) 0.911
30 2.50 7.30 1.082 0.097 ( 0.108) 0.985
31 2.58 8.20 1.216 0.097 ( 0.122) 1.119
32 2.67 5.90 0.875 ( 0.097) 0.087 0.787
33 2.75 2.00 0.297 ( 0.097) 0.030 0.267
34 2.83 1.80 0.267 ( 0.097) 0.027 0.240
35 2.92 1.80 0.267 ( 0.097) 0.027 0.240
36 3.00 0.60 0.089 ( 0.097) 0.009 0.080
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 13.4
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 1.12(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 6.2(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.12(In)
Total soil loss = 0.673(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 1.24(In)
Flood volume = 271693.6 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 29296.8 Cubic Feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2112 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10310
Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 65.220(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 17.5 35.0 52.5 70.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0167 2.42 VQ | | | |
0+10 0.0727 8.13 V Q | | | |
0+15 0.1382 9.52 V Q | | | |
0+20 0.2084 10.19 |V Q | | | |
0+25 0.2919 12.12 |V Q | | | |
0+30 0.3840 13.38 | V Q | | | |
0+35 0.4838 14.49 | V Q | | | |
0+40 0.5828 14.37 | V Q | | | |
0+45 0.6898 15.53 | V Q | | | |
0+50 0.7954 15.33 | V Q | | | |
0+55 0.8944 14.39 | V Q | | | |
1+ 0 0.9969 14.87 | V Q | | | |
1+ 5 1.1105 16.50 | V Q| | | |
1+10 1.2379 18.50 | V Q | | |
1+15 1.3699 19.16 | V Q | | |
1+20 1.5013 19.09 | VQ | | |
1+25 1.6355 19.49 | VQ | | |
1+30 1.7882 22.17 | |VQ | | |
1+35 1.9453 22.81 | | VQ | | |
1+40 2.1004 22.53 | | QV | | |
1+45 2.2711 24.78 | | Q | | |
1+50 2.4599 27.41 | | Q | | |
1+55 2.6467 27.13 | | QV | | |
2+ 0 2.8303 26.65 | | Q V | | |
2+ 5 3.0171 27.13 | | Q V| | |
2+10 3.2216 29.70 | | Q V | |
2+15 3.4710 36.22 | | Q V | |
2+20 3.7363 38.52 | | | QV | |
2+25 4.0110 39.89 | | | Q V | |
2+30 4.3857 54.41 | | | V |Q |
2+35 4.8185 62.83 | | | V Q |
2+40 5.2676 65.22 | | | | V Q |
2+45 5.6104 49.78 | | | Q | V |
2+50 5.8193 30.33 | | Q | | V |
2+55 5.9804 23.39 | | Q | | V |
3+ 0 6.1063 18.28 | Q | | V|
3+ 5 6.1757 10.08 | Q | | | V|
3+10 6.2079 4.67 | Q | | | V|
3+15 6.2237 2.29 |Q | | | V|
3+20 6.2310 1.06 Q | | | V|
3+25 6.2349 0.57 Q | | | V|
3+30 6.2368 0.28 Q | | | V|
3+35 6.2372 0.07 Q | | | V|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2113 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10610
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR10610.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 10-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 6 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.15 77.16
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 2.50 167.75
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 10.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 1.150(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 2.500(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 1.705(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.98 %
Adjusted average point rain = 1.705(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-2 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 56.0 0.511 0.900 0.097 1.000 0.097
Sum (F) = 0.097
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2114 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10610
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.097
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.049
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 0.50 0.102 ( 0.097) 0.010 0.092
2 0.17 0.60 0.123 ( 0.097) 0.012 0.110
3 0.25 0.60 0.123 ( 0.097) 0.012 0.110
4 0.33 0.60 0.123 ( 0.097) 0.012 0.110
5 0.42 0.60 0.123 ( 0.097) 0.012 0.110
6 0.50 0.70 0.143 ( 0.097) 0.014 0.129
7 0.58 0.70 0.143 ( 0.097) 0.014 0.129
8 0.67 0.70 0.143 ( 0.097) 0.014 0.129
9 0.75 0.70 0.143 ( 0.097) 0.014 0.129
10 0.83 0.70 0.143 ( 0.097) 0.014 0.129
11 0.92 0.70 0.143 ( 0.097) 0.014 0.129
12 1.00 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
13 1.08 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
14 1.17 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
15 1.25 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
16 1.33 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
17 1.42 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
18 1.50 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
19 1.58 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
20 1.67 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
21 1.75 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
22 1.83 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
23 1.92 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
24 2.00 0.90 0.184 ( 0.097) 0.018 0.166
25 2.08 0.80 0.164 ( 0.097) 0.016 0.147
26 2.17 0.90 0.184 ( 0.097) 0.018 0.166
27 2.25 0.90 0.184 ( 0.097) 0.018 0.166
28 2.33 0.90 0.184 ( 0.097) 0.018 0.166
29 2.42 0.90 0.184 ( 0.097) 0.018 0.166
30 2.50 0.90 0.184 ( 0.097) 0.018 0.166
31 2.58 0.90 0.184 ( 0.097) 0.018 0.166
32 2.67 0.90 0.184 ( 0.097) 0.018 0.166
33 2.75 1.00 0.205 ( 0.097) 0.020 0.184
34 2.83 1.00 0.205 ( 0.097) 0.020 0.184
35 2.92 1.00 0.205 ( 0.097) 0.020 0.184
36 3.00 1.00 0.205 ( 0.097) 0.020 0.184
37 3.08 1.00 0.205 ( 0.097) 0.020 0.184
38 3.17 1.10 0.225 ( 0.097) 0.023 0.203
39 3.25 1.10 0.225 ( 0.097) 0.023 0.203
40 3.33 1.10 0.225 ( 0.097) 0.023 0.203
41 3.42 1.20 0.246 ( 0.097) 0.025 0.221
42 3.50 1.30 0.266 ( 0.097) 0.027 0.239
43 3.58 1.40 0.286 ( 0.097) 0.029 0.258
44 3.67 1.40 0.286 ( 0.097) 0.029 0.258
45 3.75 1.50 0.307 ( 0.097) 0.031 0.276
46 3.83 1.50 0.307 ( 0.097) 0.031 0.276
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2115 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10610
47 3.92 1.60 0.327 ( 0.097) 0.033 0.295
48 4.00 1.60 0.327 ( 0.097) 0.033 0.295
49 4.08 1.70 0.348 ( 0.097) 0.035 0.313
50 4.17 1.80 0.368 ( 0.097) 0.037 0.331
51 4.25 1.90 0.389 ( 0.097) 0.039 0.350
52 4.33 2.00 0.409 ( 0.097) 0.041 0.368
53 4.42 2.10 0.430 ( 0.097) 0.043 0.387
54 4.50 2.10 0.430 ( 0.097) 0.043 0.387
55 4.58 2.20 0.450 ( 0.097) 0.045 0.405
56 4.67 2.30 0.471 ( 0.097) 0.047 0.424
57 4.75 2.40 0.491 ( 0.097) 0.049 0.442
58 4.83 2.40 0.491 ( 0.097) 0.049 0.442
59 4.92 2.50 0.512 ( 0.097) 0.051 0.460
60 5.00 2.60 0.532 ( 0.097) 0.053 0.479
61 5.08 3.10 0.634 ( 0.097) 0.063 0.571
62 5.17 3.60 0.737 ( 0.097) 0.074 0.663
63 5.25 3.90 0.798 ( 0.097) 0.080 0.718
64 5.33 4.20 0.859 ( 0.097) 0.086 0.773
65 5.42 4.70 0.962 ( 0.097) 0.096 0.865
66 5.50 5.60 1.146 0.097 ( 0.115) 1.049
67 5.58 1.90 0.389 ( 0.097) 0.039 0.350
68 5.67 0.90 0.184 ( 0.097) 0.018 0.166
69 5.75 0.60 0.123 ( 0.097) 0.012 0.110
70 5.83 0.50 0.102 ( 0.097) 0.010 0.092
71 5.92 0.30 0.061 ( 0.097) 0.006 0.055
72 6.00 0.20 0.041 ( 0.097) 0.004 0.037
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 18.4
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 1.54(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 8.6(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.17(In)
Total soil loss = 0.945(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 1.71(In)
Flood volume = 374120.1 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 41173.7 Cubic Feet
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 57.779(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 15.0 30.0 45.0 60.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0088 1.28 Q | | | |
0+10 0.0403 4.57 V Q | | | |
0+15 0.0824 6.11 V Q | | | |
0+20 0.1287 6.72 V Q | | | |
0+25 0.1773 7.05 V Q | | | |
0+30 0.2289 7.50 |V Q | | | |
0+35 0.2856 8.23 |V Q | | | |
0+40 0.3442 8.51 |V Q | | | |
0+45 0.4035 8.61 |V Q | | | |
0+50 0.4632 8.66 | V Q | | | |
0+55 0.5230 8.69 | V Q | | | |
1+ 0 0.5847 8.96 | V Q | | | |
1+ 5 0.6507 9.58 | V Q | | | |
1+10 0.7180 9.77 | V Q | | | |
1+15 0.7859 9.86 | V Q | | | |
1+20 0.8541 9.90 | V Q | | | |
1+25 0.9225 9.93 | V Q | | | |
1+30 0.9911 9.95 | V Q | | | |
1+35 1.0597 9.97 | V Q | | | |
1+40 1.1283 9.97 | VQ | | | |
1+45 1.1970 9.97 | VQ | | | |
1+50 1.2656 9.97 | VQ | | | |
1+55 1.3343 9.97 | Q | | | |
2+ 0 1.4047 10.22 | Q | | | |
2+ 5 1.4775 10.57 | VQ | | | |
2+10 1.5492 10.41 | QV | | | |
2+15 1.6244 10.92 | Q | | | |
2+20 1.7006 11.06 | Q | | | |
2+25 1.7773 11.13 | QV | | | |
2+30 1.8542 11.17 | QV | | | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2116 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10610
2+35 1.9313 11.19 | QV | | | |
2+40 2.0084 11.20 | Q V| | | |
2+45 2.0874 11.47 | Q V| | | |
2+50 2.1705 12.08 | Q V | | |
2+55 2.2550 12.26 | Q V | | |
3+ 0 2.3400 12.35 | Q V | | |
3+ 5 2.4254 12.40 | Q |V | | |
3+10 2.5127 12.68 | Q |V | | |
3+15 2.6044 13.31 | Q | V | | |
3+20 2.6974 13.51 | Q| V | | |
3+25 2.7928 13.85 | Q| V | | |
3+30 2.8945 14.76 | Q| V | | |
3+35 3.0036 15.84 | Q V | | |
3+40 3.1189 16.74 | |Q V | | |
3+45 3.2382 17.33 | |Q V | | |
3+50 3.3628 18.10 | | Q V | | |
3+55 3.4912 18.64 | | Q V | | |
4+ 0 3.6247 19.39 | | Q V | | |
4+ 5 3.7619 19.92 | | Q V | | |
4+10 3.9059 20.91 | | Q V | | |
4+15 4.0576 22.03 | | Q V | | |
4+20 4.2174 23.21 | | Q V| | |
4+25 4.3855 24.41 | | Q V | |
4+30 4.5603 25.38 | | Q |V | |
4+35 4.7394 26.00 | | Q | V | |
4+40 4.9257 27.06 | | Q | V | |
4+45 5.1201 28.22 | | Q | V | |
4+50 5.3209 29.16 | | Q| V | |
4+55 5.5260 29.77 | | Q| V | |
5+ 0 5.7382 30.81 | | Q V | |
5+ 5 5.9654 32.99 | | |Q V | |
5+10 6.2246 37.64 | | | Q V | |
5+15 6.5176 42.54 | | | Q V |
5+20 6.8384 46.58 | | | |Q |
5+25 7.1893 50.95 | | | | Q |
5+30 7.5872 57.78 | | | | V Q |
5+35 7.9705 55.66 | | | | Q |
5+40 8.1961 32.75 | | |Q | V |
5+45 8.3348 20.14 | | Q | | V |
5+50 8.4291 13.69 | Q| | | V|
5+55 8.4966 9.80 | Q | | | V|
6+ 0 8.5415 6.52 | Q | | | V|
6+ 5 8.5688 3.96 | Q | | | V|
6+10 8.5791 1.50 Q | | | V|
6+15 8.5840 0.71 Q | | | V|
6+20 8.5865 0.37 Q | | | V|
6+25 8.5878 0.19 Q | | | V|
6+30 8.5884 0.08 Q | | | V|
6+35 8.5886 0.03 Q | | | V|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2117 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR102410.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 10-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 24 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.75 117.42
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 4.50 301.95
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 10.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 1.750(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 4.500(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 2.881(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.99 %
Adjusted average point rain = 2.881(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-2 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 56.0 0.511 0.900 0.097 1.000 0.097
Sum (F) = 0.097
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2118 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.097
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.049
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 0.07 0.023 ( 0.172) 0.002 0.021
2 0.17 0.07 0.023 ( 0.171) 0.002 0.021
3 0.25 0.07 0.023 ( 0.171) 0.002 0.021
4 0.33 0.10 0.035 ( 0.170) 0.003 0.031
5 0.42 0.10 0.035 ( 0.169) 0.003 0.031
6 0.50 0.10 0.035 ( 0.169) 0.003 0.031
7 0.58 0.10 0.035 ( 0.168) 0.003 0.031
8 0.67 0.10 0.035 ( 0.167) 0.003 0.031
9 0.75 0.10 0.035 ( 0.167) 0.003 0.031
10 0.83 0.13 0.046 ( 0.166) 0.005 0.041
11 0.92 0.13 0.046 ( 0.165) 0.005 0.041
12 1.00 0.13 0.046 ( 0.165) 0.005 0.041
13 1.08 0.10 0.035 ( 0.164) 0.003 0.031
14 1.17 0.10 0.035 ( 0.163) 0.003 0.031
15 1.25 0.10 0.035 ( 0.163) 0.003 0.031
16 1.33 0.10 0.035 ( 0.162) 0.003 0.031
17 1.42 0.10 0.035 ( 0.162) 0.003 0.031
18 1.50 0.10 0.035 ( 0.161) 0.003 0.031
19 1.58 0.10 0.035 ( 0.160) 0.003 0.031
20 1.67 0.10 0.035 ( 0.160) 0.003 0.031
21 1.75 0.10 0.035 ( 0.159) 0.003 0.031
22 1.83 0.13 0.046 ( 0.158) 0.005 0.041
23 1.92 0.13 0.046 ( 0.158) 0.005 0.041
24 2.00 0.13 0.046 ( 0.157) 0.005 0.041
25 2.08 0.13 0.046 ( 0.156) 0.005 0.041
26 2.17 0.13 0.046 ( 0.156) 0.005 0.041
27 2.25 0.13 0.046 ( 0.155) 0.005 0.041
28 2.33 0.13 0.046 ( 0.155) 0.005 0.041
29 2.42 0.13 0.046 ( 0.154) 0.005 0.041
30 2.50 0.13 0.046 ( 0.153) 0.005 0.041
31 2.58 0.17 0.058 ( 0.153) 0.006 0.052
32 2.67 0.17 0.058 ( 0.152) 0.006 0.052
33 2.75 0.17 0.058 ( 0.151) 0.006 0.052
34 2.83 0.17 0.058 ( 0.151) 0.006 0.052
35 2.92 0.17 0.058 ( 0.150) 0.006 0.052
36 3.00 0.17 0.058 ( 0.150) 0.006 0.052
37 3.08 0.17 0.058 ( 0.149) 0.006 0.052
38 3.17 0.17 0.058 ( 0.148) 0.006 0.052
39 3.25 0.17 0.058 ( 0.148) 0.006 0.052
40 3.33 0.17 0.058 ( 0.147) 0.006 0.052
41 3.42 0.17 0.058 ( 0.146) 0.006 0.052
42 3.50 0.17 0.058 ( 0.146) 0.006 0.052
43 3.58 0.17 0.058 ( 0.145) 0.006 0.052
44 3.67 0.17 0.058 ( 0.145) 0.006 0.052
45 3.75 0.17 0.058 ( 0.144) 0.006 0.052
46 3.83 0.20 0.069 ( 0.143) 0.007 0.062
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2119 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
47 3.92 0.20 0.069 ( 0.143) 0.007 0.062
48 4.00 0.20 0.069 ( 0.142) 0.007 0.062
49 4.08 0.20 0.069 ( 0.142) 0.007 0.062
50 4.17 0.20 0.069 ( 0.141) 0.007 0.062
51 4.25 0.20 0.069 ( 0.140) 0.007 0.062
52 4.33 0.23 0.081 ( 0.140) 0.008 0.073
53 4.42 0.23 0.081 ( 0.139) 0.008 0.073
54 4.50 0.23 0.081 ( 0.139) 0.008 0.073
55 4.58 0.23 0.081 ( 0.138) 0.008 0.073
56 4.67 0.23 0.081 ( 0.137) 0.008 0.073
57 4.75 0.23 0.081 ( 0.137) 0.008 0.073
58 4.83 0.27 0.092 ( 0.136) 0.009 0.083
59 4.92 0.27 0.092 ( 0.136) 0.009 0.083
60 5.00 0.27 0.092 ( 0.135) 0.009 0.083
61 5.08 0.20 0.069 ( 0.134) 0.007 0.062
62 5.17 0.20 0.069 ( 0.134) 0.007 0.062
63 5.25 0.20 0.069 ( 0.133) 0.007 0.062
64 5.33 0.23 0.081 ( 0.133) 0.008 0.073
65 5.42 0.23 0.081 ( 0.132) 0.008 0.073
66 5.50 0.23 0.081 ( 0.132) 0.008 0.073
67 5.58 0.27 0.092 ( 0.131) 0.009 0.083
68 5.67 0.27 0.092 ( 0.130) 0.009 0.083
69 5.75 0.27 0.092 ( 0.130) 0.009 0.083
70 5.83 0.27 0.092 ( 0.129) 0.009 0.083
71 5.92 0.27 0.092 ( 0.129) 0.009 0.083
72 6.00 0.27 0.092 ( 0.128) 0.009 0.083
73 6.08 0.30 0.104 ( 0.128) 0.010 0.093
74 6.17 0.30 0.104 ( 0.127) 0.010 0.093
75 6.25 0.30 0.104 ( 0.126) 0.010 0.093
76 6.33 0.30 0.104 ( 0.126) 0.010 0.093
77 6.42 0.30 0.104 ( 0.125) 0.010 0.093
78 6.50 0.30 0.104 ( 0.125) 0.010 0.093
79 6.58 0.33 0.115 ( 0.124) 0.012 0.104
80 6.67 0.33 0.115 ( 0.124) 0.012 0.104
81 6.75 0.33 0.115 ( 0.123) 0.012 0.104
82 6.83 0.33 0.115 ( 0.122) 0.012 0.104
83 6.92 0.33 0.115 ( 0.122) 0.012 0.104
84 7.00 0.33 0.115 ( 0.121) 0.012 0.104
85 7.08 0.33 0.115 ( 0.121) 0.012 0.104
86 7.17 0.33 0.115 ( 0.120) 0.012 0.104
87 7.25 0.33 0.115 ( 0.120) 0.012 0.104
88 7.33 0.37 0.127 ( 0.119) 0.013 0.114
89 7.42 0.37 0.127 ( 0.119) 0.013 0.114
90 7.50 0.37 0.127 ( 0.118) 0.013 0.114
91 7.58 0.40 0.138 ( 0.118) 0.014 0.124
92 7.67 0.40 0.138 ( 0.117) 0.014 0.124
93 7.75 0.40 0.138 ( 0.116) 0.014 0.124
94 7.83 0.43 0.150 ( 0.116) 0.015 0.135
95 7.92 0.43 0.150 ( 0.115) 0.015 0.135
96 8.00 0.43 0.150 ( 0.115) 0.015 0.135
97 8.08 0.50 0.173 ( 0.114) 0.017 0.156
98 8.17 0.50 0.173 ( 0.114) 0.017 0.156
99 8.25 0.50 0.173 ( 0.113) 0.017 0.156
100 8.33 0.50 0.173 ( 0.113) 0.017 0.156
101 8.42 0.50 0.173 ( 0.112) 0.017 0.156
102 8.50 0.50 0.173 ( 0.112) 0.017 0.156
103 8.58 0.53 0.184 ( 0.111) 0.018 0.166
104 8.67 0.53 0.184 ( 0.111) 0.018 0.166
105 8.75 0.53 0.184 ( 0.110) 0.018 0.166
106 8.83 0.57 0.196 ( 0.110) 0.020 0.176
107 8.92 0.57 0.196 ( 0.109) 0.020 0.176
108 9.00 0.57 0.196 ( 0.109) 0.020 0.176
109 9.08 0.63 0.219 ( 0.108) 0.022 0.197
110 9.17 0.63 0.219 ( 0.108) 0.022 0.197
111 9.25 0.63 0.219 ( 0.107) 0.022 0.197
112 9.33 0.67 0.230 ( 0.107) 0.023 0.207
113 9.42 0.67 0.230 ( 0.106) 0.023 0.207
114 9.50 0.67 0.230 ( 0.105) 0.023 0.207
115 9.58 0.70 0.242 ( 0.105) 0.024 0.218
116 9.67 0.70 0.242 ( 0.104) 0.024 0.218
117 9.75 0.70 0.242 ( 0.104) 0.024 0.218
118 9.83 0.73 0.254 ( 0.103) 0.025 0.228
119 9.92 0.73 0.254 ( 0.103) 0.025 0.228
120 10.00 0.73 0.254 ( 0.102) 0.025 0.228
121 10.08 0.50 0.173 ( 0.102) 0.017 0.156
122 10.17 0.50 0.173 ( 0.101) 0.017 0.156
123 10.25 0.50 0.173 ( 0.101) 0.017 0.156
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2120 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
124 10.33 0.50 0.173 ( 0.101) 0.017 0.156
125 10.42 0.50 0.173 ( 0.100) 0.017 0.156
126 10.50 0.50 0.173 ( 0.100) 0.017 0.156
127 10.58 0.67 0.230 ( 0.099) 0.023 0.207
128 10.67 0.67 0.230 ( 0.099) 0.023 0.207
129 10.75 0.67 0.230 ( 0.098) 0.023 0.207
130 10.83 0.67 0.230 ( 0.098) 0.023 0.207
131 10.92 0.67 0.230 ( 0.097) 0.023 0.207
132 11.00 0.67 0.230 ( 0.097) 0.023 0.207
133 11.08 0.63 0.219 ( 0.096) 0.022 0.197
134 11.17 0.63 0.219 ( 0.096) 0.022 0.197
135 11.25 0.63 0.219 ( 0.095) 0.022 0.197
136 11.33 0.63 0.219 ( 0.095) 0.022 0.197
137 11.42 0.63 0.219 ( 0.094) 0.022 0.197
138 11.50 0.63 0.219 ( 0.094) 0.022 0.197
139 11.58 0.57 0.196 ( 0.093) 0.020 0.176
140 11.67 0.57 0.196 ( 0.093) 0.020 0.176
141 11.75 0.57 0.196 ( 0.092) 0.020 0.176
142 11.83 0.60 0.207 ( 0.092) 0.021 0.187
143 11.92 0.60 0.207 ( 0.092) 0.021 0.187
144 12.00 0.60 0.207 ( 0.091) 0.021 0.187
145 12.08 0.83 0.288 ( 0.091) 0.029 0.259
146 12.17 0.83 0.288 ( 0.090) 0.029 0.259
147 12.25 0.83 0.288 ( 0.090) 0.029 0.259
148 12.33 0.87 0.300 ( 0.089) 0.030 0.270
149 12.42 0.87 0.300 ( 0.089) 0.030 0.270
150 12.50 0.87 0.300 ( 0.088) 0.030 0.270
151 12.58 0.93 0.323 ( 0.088) 0.032 0.290
152 12.67 0.93 0.323 ( 0.087) 0.032 0.290
153 12.75 0.93 0.323 ( 0.087) 0.032 0.290
154 12.83 0.97 0.334 ( 0.087) 0.033 0.301
155 12.92 0.97 0.334 ( 0.086) 0.033 0.301
156 13.00 0.97 0.334 ( 0.086) 0.033 0.301
157 13.08 1.13 0.392 ( 0.085) 0.039 0.353
158 13.17 1.13 0.392 ( 0.085) 0.039 0.353
159 13.25 1.13 0.392 ( 0.084) 0.039 0.353
160 13.33 1.13 0.392 ( 0.084) 0.039 0.353
161 13.42 1.13 0.392 ( 0.084) 0.039 0.353
162 13.50 1.13 0.392 ( 0.083) 0.039 0.353
163 13.58 0.77 0.265 ( 0.083) 0.027 0.239
164 13.67 0.77 0.265 ( 0.082) 0.027 0.239
165 13.75 0.77 0.265 ( 0.082) 0.027 0.239
166 13.83 0.77 0.265 ( 0.081) 0.027 0.239
167 13.92 0.77 0.265 ( 0.081) 0.027 0.239
168 14.00 0.77 0.265 ( 0.081) 0.027 0.239
169 14.08 0.90 0.311 ( 0.080) 0.031 0.280
170 14.17 0.90 0.311 ( 0.080) 0.031 0.280
171 14.25 0.90 0.311 ( 0.079) 0.031 0.280
172 14.33 0.87 0.300 ( 0.079) 0.030 0.270
173 14.42 0.87 0.300 ( 0.079) 0.030 0.270
174 14.50 0.87 0.300 ( 0.078) 0.030 0.270
175 14.58 0.87 0.300 ( 0.078) 0.030 0.270
176 14.67 0.87 0.300 ( 0.077) 0.030 0.270
177 14.75 0.87 0.300 ( 0.077) 0.030 0.270
178 14.83 0.83 0.288 ( 0.077) 0.029 0.259
179 14.92 0.83 0.288 ( 0.076) 0.029 0.259
180 15.00 0.83 0.288 ( 0.076) 0.029 0.259
181 15.08 0.80 0.277 ( 0.075) 0.028 0.249
182 15.17 0.80 0.277 ( 0.075) 0.028 0.249
183 15.25 0.80 0.277 ( 0.075) 0.028 0.249
184 15.33 0.77 0.265 ( 0.074) 0.027 0.239
185 15.42 0.77 0.265 ( 0.074) 0.027 0.239
186 15.50 0.77 0.265 ( 0.073) 0.027 0.239
187 15.58 0.63 0.219 ( 0.073) 0.022 0.197
188 15.67 0.63 0.219 ( 0.073) 0.022 0.197
189 15.75 0.63 0.219 ( 0.072) 0.022 0.197
190 15.83 0.63 0.219 ( 0.072) 0.022 0.197
191 15.92 0.63 0.219 ( 0.072) 0.022 0.197
192 16.00 0.63 0.219 ( 0.071) 0.022 0.197
193 16.08 0.13 0.046 ( 0.071) 0.005 0.041
194 16.17 0.13 0.046 ( 0.071) 0.005 0.041
195 16.25 0.13 0.046 ( 0.070) 0.005 0.041
196 16.33 0.13 0.046 ( 0.070) 0.005 0.041
197 16.42 0.13 0.046 ( 0.069) 0.005 0.041
198 16.50 0.13 0.046 ( 0.069) 0.005 0.041
199 16.58 0.10 0.035 ( 0.069) 0.003 0.031
200 16.67 0.10 0.035 ( 0.068) 0.003 0.031
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2121 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
201 16.75 0.10 0.035 ( 0.068) 0.003 0.031
202 16.83 0.10 0.035 ( 0.068) 0.003 0.031
203 16.92 0.10 0.035 ( 0.067) 0.003 0.031
204 17.00 0.10 0.035 ( 0.067) 0.003 0.031
205 17.08 0.17 0.058 ( 0.067) 0.006 0.052
206 17.17 0.17 0.058 ( 0.066) 0.006 0.052
207 17.25 0.17 0.058 ( 0.066) 0.006 0.052
208 17.33 0.17 0.058 ( 0.066) 0.006 0.052
209 17.42 0.17 0.058 ( 0.065) 0.006 0.052
210 17.50 0.17 0.058 ( 0.065) 0.006 0.052
211 17.58 0.17 0.058 ( 0.065) 0.006 0.052
212 17.67 0.17 0.058 ( 0.064) 0.006 0.052
213 17.75 0.17 0.058 ( 0.064) 0.006 0.052
214 17.83 0.13 0.046 ( 0.064) 0.005 0.041
215 17.92 0.13 0.046 ( 0.063) 0.005 0.041
216 18.00 0.13 0.046 ( 0.063) 0.005 0.041
217 18.08 0.13 0.046 ( 0.063) 0.005 0.041
218 18.17 0.13 0.046 ( 0.063) 0.005 0.041
219 18.25 0.13 0.046 ( 0.062) 0.005 0.041
220 18.33 0.13 0.046 ( 0.062) 0.005 0.041
221 18.42 0.13 0.046 ( 0.062) 0.005 0.041
222 18.50 0.13 0.046 ( 0.061) 0.005 0.041
223 18.58 0.10 0.035 ( 0.061) 0.003 0.031
224 18.67 0.10 0.035 ( 0.061) 0.003 0.031
225 18.75 0.10 0.035 ( 0.060) 0.003 0.031
226 18.83 0.07 0.023 ( 0.060) 0.002 0.021
227 18.92 0.07 0.023 ( 0.060) 0.002 0.021
228 19.00 0.07 0.023 ( 0.060) 0.002 0.021
229 19.08 0.10 0.035 ( 0.059) 0.003 0.031
230 19.17 0.10 0.035 ( 0.059) 0.003 0.031
231 19.25 0.10 0.035 ( 0.059) 0.003 0.031
232 19.33 0.13 0.046 ( 0.058) 0.005 0.041
233 19.42 0.13 0.046 ( 0.058) 0.005 0.041
234 19.50 0.13 0.046 ( 0.058) 0.005 0.041
235 19.58 0.10 0.035 ( 0.058) 0.003 0.031
236 19.67 0.10 0.035 ( 0.057) 0.003 0.031
237 19.75 0.10 0.035 ( 0.057) 0.003 0.031
238 19.83 0.07 0.023 ( 0.057) 0.002 0.021
239 19.92 0.07 0.023 ( 0.057) 0.002 0.021
240 20.00 0.07 0.023 ( 0.056) 0.002 0.021
241 20.08 0.10 0.035 ( 0.056) 0.003 0.031
242 20.17 0.10 0.035 ( 0.056) 0.003 0.031
243 20.25 0.10 0.035 ( 0.056) 0.003 0.031
244 20.33 0.10 0.035 ( 0.055) 0.003 0.031
245 20.42 0.10 0.035 ( 0.055) 0.003 0.031
246 20.50 0.10 0.035 ( 0.055) 0.003 0.031
247 20.58 0.10 0.035 ( 0.055) 0.003 0.031
248 20.67 0.10 0.035 ( 0.054) 0.003 0.031
249 20.75 0.10 0.035 ( 0.054) 0.003 0.031
250 20.83 0.07 0.023 ( 0.054) 0.002 0.021
251 20.92 0.07 0.023 ( 0.054) 0.002 0.021
252 21.00 0.07 0.023 ( 0.054) 0.002 0.021
253 21.08 0.10 0.035 ( 0.053) 0.003 0.031
254 21.17 0.10 0.035 ( 0.053) 0.003 0.031
255 21.25 0.10 0.035 ( 0.053) 0.003 0.031
256 21.33 0.07 0.023 ( 0.053) 0.002 0.021
257 21.42 0.07 0.023 ( 0.053) 0.002 0.021
258 21.50 0.07 0.023 ( 0.052) 0.002 0.021
259 21.58 0.10 0.035 ( 0.052) 0.003 0.031
260 21.67 0.10 0.035 ( 0.052) 0.003 0.031
261 21.75 0.10 0.035 ( 0.052) 0.003 0.031
262 21.83 0.07 0.023 ( 0.052) 0.002 0.021
263 21.92 0.07 0.023 ( 0.051) 0.002 0.021
264 22.00 0.07 0.023 ( 0.051) 0.002 0.021
265 22.08 0.10 0.035 ( 0.051) 0.003 0.031
266 22.17 0.10 0.035 ( 0.051) 0.003 0.031
267 22.25 0.10 0.035 ( 0.051) 0.003 0.031
268 22.33 0.07 0.023 ( 0.051) 0.002 0.021
269 22.42 0.07 0.023 ( 0.050) 0.002 0.021
270 22.50 0.07 0.023 ( 0.050) 0.002 0.021
271 22.58 0.07 0.023 ( 0.050) 0.002 0.021
272 22.67 0.07 0.023 ( 0.050) 0.002 0.021
273 22.75 0.07 0.023 ( 0.050) 0.002 0.021
274 22.83 0.07 0.023 ( 0.050) 0.002 0.021
275 22.92 0.07 0.023 ( 0.050) 0.002 0.021
276 23.00 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
277 23.08 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2122 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
278 23.17 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
279 23.25 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
280 23.33 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
281 23.42 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
282 23.50 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
283 23.58 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
284 23.67 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
285 23.75 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
286 23.83 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
287 23.92 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
288 24.00 0.07 0.023 ( 0.049) 0.002 0.021
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 31.1
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 2.59(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 14.5(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.29(In)
Total soil loss = 1.611(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 2.88(In)
Flood volume = 631559.3 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 70173.3 Cubic Feet
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 23.765(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 24 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 7.5 15.0 22.5 30.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0020 0.29 Q | | | |
0+10 0.0087 0.97 VQ | | | |
0+15 0.0168 1.18 VQ | | | |
0+20 0.0266 1.42 VQ | | | |
0+25 0.0392 1.82 V Q | | | |
0+30 0.0526 1.96 V Q | | | |
0+35 0.0666 2.03 V Q | | | |
0+40 0.0808 2.07 V Q | | | |
0+45 0.0952 2.09 V Q | | | |
0+50 0.1106 2.24 V Q | | | |
0+55 0.1285 2.59 V Q | | | |
1+ 0 0.1471 2.70 V Q | | | |
1+ 5 0.1650 2.60 V Q | | | |
1+10 0.1807 2.28 V Q | | | |
1+15 0.1958 2.20 V Q | | | |
1+20 0.2107 2.16 V Q | | | |
1+25 0.2255 2.14 V Q | | | |
1+30 0.2401 2.12 V Q | | | |
1+35 0.2546 2.11 V Q | | | |
1+40 0.2691 2.11 V Q | | | |
1+45 0.2836 2.11 V Q | | | |
1+50 0.2991 2.25 V Q | | | |
1+55 0.3170 2.59 V Q | | | |
2+ 0 0.3355 2.70 V Q | | | |
2+ 5 0.3544 2.74 V Q | | | |
2+10 0.3735 2.77 |V Q | | | |
2+15 0.3927 2.79 |V Q | | | |
2+20 0.4120 2.80 |V Q | | | |
2+25 0.4313 2.81 |V Q | | | |
2+30 0.4507 2.81 |V Q | | | |
2+35 0.4710 2.95 |V Q | | | |
2+40 0.4937 3.29 |V Q | | | |
2+45 0.5171 3.40 |V Q | | | |
2+50 0.5408 3.45 |V Q | | | |
2+55 0.5647 3.47 |V Q | | | |
3+ 0 0.5888 3.49 |V Q | | | |
3+ 5 0.6129 3.50 |V Q | | | |
3+10 0.6370 3.51 |V Q | | | |
3+15 0.6612 3.51 |V Q | | | |
3+20 0.6854 3.51 |V Q | | | |
3+25 0.7095 3.51 |V Q | | | |
3+30 0.7337 3.51 | V Q | | | |
3+35 0.7579 3.51 | V Q | | | |
3+40 0.7820 3.51 | V Q | | | |
3+45 0.8062 3.51 | V Q | | | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2123 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
3+50 0.8313 3.65 | V Q | | | |
3+55 0.8589 3.99 | V Q | | | |
4+ 0 0.8871 4.10 | V Q | | | |
4+ 5 0.9157 4.15 | V Q | | | |
4+10 0.9444 4.17 | V Q | | | |
4+15 0.9733 4.19 | V Q | | | |
4+20 1.0032 4.35 | V Q | | | |
4+25 1.0356 4.70 | V Q | | | |
4+30 1.0686 4.80 | V Q | | | |
4+35 1.1020 4.85 | V Q | | | |
4+40 1.1356 4.88 | V Q | | | |
4+45 1.1693 4.89 | V Q | | | |
4+50 1.2041 5.05 | V Q | | | |
4+55 1.2413 5.40 | V Q | | | |
5+ 0 1.2792 5.50 | V Q | | | |
5+ 5 1.3154 5.26 | V Q | | | |
5+10 1.3471 4.61 | V Q | | | |
5+15 1.3775 4.41 | V Q | | | |
5+20 1.4083 4.47 | V Q | | | |
5+25 1.4412 4.77 | V Q | | | |
5+30 1.4745 4.84 | V Q | | | |
5+35 1.5090 5.01 | V Q | | | |
5+40 1.5459 5.36 | V Q | | | |
5+45 1.5837 5.48 | V Q | | | |
5+50 1.6219 5.54 | V Q | | | |
5+55 1.6603 5.58 | V Q | | | |
6+ 0 1.6988 5.60 | V Q | | | |
6+ 5 1.7384 5.75 | V Q | | | |
6+10 1.7804 6.10 | V Q | | | |
6+15 1.8232 6.21 | V Q | | | |
6+20 1.8662 6.25 | V Q | | | |
6+25 1.9095 6.28 | V Q | | | |
6+30 1.9529 6.30 | V Q | | | |
6+35 1.9973 6.45 | V Q | | | |
6+40 2.0441 6.80 | V Q| | | |
6+45 2.0917 6.91 | V Q| | | |
6+50 2.1396 6.95 | V Q| | | |
6+55 2.1877 6.98 | V Q| | | |
7+ 0 2.2359 7.00 | V Q| | | |
7+ 5 2.2841 7.01 | V Q| | | |
7+10 2.3325 7.02 | V Q| | | |
7+15 2.3808 7.02 | V Q| | | |
7+20 2.4301 7.16 | V Q| | | |
7+25 2.4818 7.50 | V Q | | |
7+30 2.5342 7.61 | V Q | | |
7+35 2.5879 7.80 | V Q | | |
7+40 2.6442 8.17 | V Q | | |
7+45 2.7013 8.29 | V |Q | | |
7+50 2.7598 8.49 | V |Q | | |
7+55 2.8209 8.87 | V |Q | | |
8+ 0 2.8828 8.99 | V |Q | | |
8+ 5 2.9472 9.34 | V | Q | | |
8+10 3.0164 10.06 | V | Q | | |
8+15 3.0873 10.29 | V | Q | | |
8+20 3.1589 10.39 | V | Q | | |
8+25 3.2309 10.45 | V | Q | | |
8+30 3.3031 10.49 | V| Q | | |
8+35 3.3765 10.65 | V| Q | | |
8+40 3.4523 11.01 | V| Q | | |
8+45 3.5289 11.12 | V| Q | | |
8+50 3.6068 11.31 | V| Q | | |
8+55 3.6872 11.68 | V Q | | |
9+ 0 3.7685 11.80 | V Q | | |
9+ 5 3.8521 12.15 | V Q | | |
9+10 3.9407 12.87 | V Q | | |
9+15 4.0309 13.09 | |V Q | | |
9+20 4.1228 13.34 | |V Q | | |
9+25 4.2175 13.75 | |V Q | | |
9+30 4.3131 13.89 | |V Q | | |
9+35 4.4102 14.10 | | V Q | | |
9+40 4.5100 14.49 | | V Q| | |
9+45 4.6106 14.61 | | V Q| | |
9+50 4.7126 14.81 | | V Q| | |
9+55 4.8172 15.19 | | V Q | |
10+ 0 4.9226 15.31 | | V Q | |
10+ 5 5.0215 14.35 | | V Q| | |
10+10 5.1041 12.00 | | VQ | | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2124 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
10+15 5.1818 11.28 | | VQ | | |
10+20 5.2573 10.96 | | Q | | |
10+25 5.3315 10.78 | | Q | | |
10+30 5.4049 10.66 | | Q | | |
10+35 5.4828 11.31 | | Q | | |
10+40 5.5720 12.96 | | V Q | | |
10+45 5.6648 13.48 | | V Q | | |
10+50 5.7594 13.72 | | V Q | | |
10+55 5.8548 13.86 | | V Q | | |
11+ 0 5.9508 13.94 | | V Q | | |
11+ 5 6.0462 13.85 | | V Q | | |
11+10 6.1395 13.55 | | V Q | | |
11+15 6.2320 13.44 | | Q | | |
11+20 6.3243 13.40 | | Q | | |
11+25 6.4164 13.37 | | Q | | |
11+30 6.5083 13.35 | | Q | | |
11+35 6.5982 13.05 | | QV | | |
11+40 6.6833 12.36 | | Q V | | |
11+45 6.7670 12.15 | | Q V | | |
11+50 6.8510 12.20 | | Q V | | |
11+55 6.9370 12.49 | | Q V| | |
12+ 0 7.0235 12.56 | | Q V| | |
12+ 5 7.1172 13.60 | | QV| | |
12+10 7.2274 16.00 | | V|Q | |
12+15 7.3427 16.75 | | V Q | |
12+20 7.4615 17.24 | | V Q | |
12+25 7.5839 17.78 | | V Q | |
12+30 7.7079 18.00 | | |V Q | |
12+35 7.8347 18.41 | | |V Q | |
12+40 7.9668 19.18 | | |V Q | |
12+45 8.1005 19.41 | | | V Q | |
12+50 8.2359 19.66 | | | V Q | |
12+55 8.3741 20.06 | | | V Q | |
13+ 0 8.5132 20.20 | | | V Q | |
13+ 5 8.6578 20.99 | | | V Q | |
13+10 8.8144 22.75 | | | V Q |
13+15 8.9748 23.29 | | | V |Q |
13+20 9.1369 23.54 | | | V |Q |
13+25 9.3000 23.68 | | | V |Q |
13+30 9.4637 23.77 | | | V |Q |
13+35 9.6168 22.23 | | | V Q| |
13+40 9.7442 18.51 | | | Q V | |
13+45 9.8638 17.35 | | | Q V | |
13+50 9.9797 16.83 | | | Q V | |
13+55 10.0935 16.53 | | | Q V | |
14+ 0 10.2061 16.35 | | |Q V | |
14+ 5 10.3219 16.81 | | | Q V | |
14+10 10.4464 18.08 | | | Q V | |
14+15 10.5739 18.51 | | | Q V| |
14+20 10.7017 18.55 | | | Q V| |
14+25 10.8278 18.32 | | | Q V| |
14+30 10.9537 18.28 | | | Q V |
14+35 11.0796 18.27 | | | Q V |
14+40 11.2055 18.28 | | | Q V |
14+45 11.3312 18.26 | | | Q |V |
14+50 11.4560 18.11 | | | Q |V |
14+55 11.5783 17.76 | | | Q |V |
15+ 0 11.6998 17.65 | | | Q | V |
15+ 5 11.8201 17.46 | | | Q | V |
15+10 11.9378 17.09 | | | Q | V |
15+15 12.0547 16.97 | | | Q | V |
15+20 12.1702 16.77 | | | Q | V |
15+25 12.2831 16.39 | | |Q | V |
15+30 12.3951 16.27 | | |Q | V |
15+35 12.5028 15.63 | | Q | V |
15+40 12.6008 14.23 | | Q | | V |
15+45 12.6958 13.79 | | Q | | V |
15+50 12.7894 13.59 | | Q | | V |
15+55 12.8822 13.48 | | Q | | V |
16+ 0 12.9745 13.41 | | Q | | V |
16+ 5 13.0516 11.20 | | Q | | V |
16+10 13.0932 6.04 | Q | | | V |
16+15 13.1240 4.46 | Q | | | V |
16+20 13.1498 3.74 | Q | | | V |
16+25 13.1728 3.34 | Q | | | V |
16+30 13.1941 3.09 | Q | | | V |
16+35 13.2133 2.79 | Q | | | V |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2125 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
16+40 13.2293 2.32 | Q | | | V |
16+45 13.2445 2.22 | Q | | | V |
16+50 13.2595 2.17 | Q | | | V |
16+55 13.2742 2.14 | Q | | | V |
17+ 0 13.2888 2.12 | Q | | | V |
17+ 5 13.3054 2.40 | Q | | | V |
17+10 13.3266 3.08 | Q | | | V |
17+15 13.3492 3.29 | Q | | | V |
17+20 13.3725 3.38 | Q | | | V |
17+25 13.3962 3.44 | Q | | | V |
17+30 13.4201 3.47 | Q | | | V |
17+35 13.4441 3.49 | Q | | | V |
17+40 13.4683 3.51 | Q | | | V |
17+45 13.4925 3.51 | Q | | | V |
17+50 13.5156 3.36 | Q | | | V |
17+55 13.5365 3.02 | Q | | | V |
18+ 0 13.5565 2.92 | Q | | | V |
18+ 5 13.5763 2.87 | Q | | | V |
18+10 13.5959 2.84 | Q | | | V |
18+15 13.6153 2.83 | Q | | | V |
18+20 13.6347 2.82 | Q | | | V |
18+25 13.6541 2.81 | Q | | | V |
18+30 13.6734 2.81 | Q | | | V |
18+35 13.6917 2.66 | Q | | | V |
18+40 13.7077 2.32 | Q | | | V |
18+45 13.7230 2.22 | Q | | | V |
18+50 13.7369 2.02 | Q | | | V |
18+55 13.7483 1.65 | Q | | | V |
19+ 0 13.7589 1.53 | Q | | | V |
19+ 5 13.7700 1.62 | Q | | | V |
19+10 13.7833 1.93 | Q | | | V |
19+15 13.7971 2.01 | Q | | | V |
19+20 13.8123 2.20 | Q | | | V |
19+25 13.8299 2.56 | Q | | | V |
19+30 13.8483 2.68 | Q | | | V |
19+35 13.8662 2.59 | Q | | | V |
19+40 13.8819 2.28 | Q | | | V |
19+45 13.8970 2.20 | Q | | | V |
19+50 13.9109 2.01 | Q | | | V |
19+55 13.9223 1.65 | Q | | | V |
20+ 0 13.9328 1.53 | Q | | | V |
20+ 5 13.9440 1.62 | Q | | | V |
20+10 13.9573 1.93 | Q | | | V |
20+15 13.9711 2.01 | Q | | | V |
20+20 13.9852 2.05 | Q | | | V |
20+25 13.9995 2.07 | Q | | | V |
20+30 14.0139 2.09 | Q | | | V |
20+35 14.0283 2.10 | Q | | | V |
20+40 14.0428 2.11 | Q | | | V |
20+45 14.0573 2.11 | Q | | | V |
20+50 14.0708 1.96 | Q | | | V |
20+55 14.0820 1.62 | Q | | | V |
21+ 0 14.0924 1.51 | Q | | | V |
21+ 5 14.1035 1.61 | Q | | | V |
21+10 14.1167 1.93 | Q | | | V |
21+15 14.1306 2.01 | Q | | | V |
21+20 14.1437 1.91 | Q | | | V|
21+25 14.1546 1.58 | Q | | | V|
21+30 14.1649 1.50 |Q | | | V|
21+35 14.1760 1.60 | Q | | | V|
21+40 14.1892 1.93 | Q | | | V|
21+45 14.2031 2.01 | Q | | | V|
21+50 14.2162 1.91 | Q | | | V|
21+55 14.2271 1.58 | Q | | | V|
22+ 0 14.2374 1.50 |Q | | | V|
22+ 5 14.2485 1.60 | Q | | | V|
22+10 14.2617 1.93 | Q | | | V|
22+15 14.2756 2.01 | Q | | | V|
22+20 14.2887 1.91 | Q | | | V|
22+25 14.2996 1.58 | Q | | | V|
22+30 14.3099 1.50 |Q | | | V|
22+35 14.3200 1.46 |Q | | | V|
22+40 14.3299 1.44 |Q | | | V|
22+45 14.3397 1.42 |Q | | | V|
22+50 14.3494 1.41 |Q | | | V|
22+55 14.3591 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+ 0 14.3687 1.40 |Q | | | V|
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2126 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR102410
23+ 5 14.3784 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+10 14.3881 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+15 14.3977 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+20 14.4074 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+25 14.4171 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+30 14.4267 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+35 14.4364 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+40 14.4461 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+45 14.4557 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+50 14.4654 1.40 |Q | | | V|
23+55 14.4750 1.40 |Q | | | V|
24+ 0 14.4847 1.40 |Q | | | V|
24+ 5 14.4924 1.11 |Q | | | V|
24+10 14.4954 0.43 Q | | | V|
24+15 14.4969 0.22 Q | | | V|
24+20 14.4977 0.13 Q | | | V|
24+25 14.4982 0.07 Q | | | V|
24+30 14.4985 0.04 Q | | | V|
24+35 14.4986 0.02 Q | | | V
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2127 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1001100
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR1001100.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 100-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 1 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 0.50 33.55
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.20 80.52
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 100.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 0.500(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 1.200(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 1.200(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.94 %
Adjusted average point rain = 1.199(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-3 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 74.8 0.305 0.900 0.058 1.000 0.058
Sum (F) = 0.058
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2128 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1001100
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.058
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.029
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Slope of intensity-duration curve for a 1 hour storm =0.5000 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 4.20 0.604 0.058 ( 0.060) 0.546
2 0.17 4.30 0.619 0.058 ( 0.062) 0.561
3 0.25 5.00 0.720 0.058 ( 0.072) 0.662
4 0.33 5.00 0.720 0.058 ( 0.072) 0.662
5 0.42 5.80 0.835 0.058 ( 0.083) 0.777
6 0.50 6.50 0.935 0.058 ( 0.094) 0.877
7 0.58 7.40 1.065 0.058 ( 0.106) 1.007
8 0.67 8.60 1.238 0.058 ( 0.124) 1.180
9 0.75 12.30 1.770 0.058 ( 0.177) 1.712
10 0.83 29.10 4.188 0.058 ( 0.419) 4.130
11 0.92 6.80 0.979 0.058 ( 0.098) 0.921
12 1.00 5.00 0.720 0.058 ( 0.072) 0.662
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 13.7
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 1.14(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 6.4(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.06(In)
Total soil loss = 0.324(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 1.20(In)
Flood volume = 277978.1 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 14131.7 Cubic Feet
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 176.999(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0525 7.62 VQ | | | |
0+10 0.2303 25.82 |V Q | | | |
0+15 0.4592 33.23 | V Q | | | |
0+20 0.7293 39.22 | V Q | | | |
0+25 1.0276 43.32 | V Q | | | |
0+30 1.3714 49.92 | VQ| | | |
0+35 1.7642 57.03 | |Q | | |
0+40 2.2179 65.89 | | Q | | |
0+45 2.7771 81.18 | | QV | | |
0+50 3.7090 135.32 | | | V Q | |
0+55 4.9280 177.00 | | | V Q |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2129 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1001100
1+ 0 5.5857 95.50 | | Q| | V |
1+ 5 5.9868 58.24 | |Q | | V |
1+10 6.1686 26.39 | Q | | | V |
1+15 6.2711 14.88 | Q | | | V|
1+20 6.3310 8.71 |Q | | | V|
1+25 6.3681 5.38 |Q | | | V|
1+30 6.3778 1.41 Q | | | V|
1+35 6.3815 0.54 Q | | | V
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2130 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1003100
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR1003100.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 100-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 3 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 0.80 53.68
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.86 124.81
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 100.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 0.800(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 1.860(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 1.860(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.97 %
Adjusted average point rain = 1.859(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-3 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 74.8 0.305 0.900 0.058 1.000 0.058
Sum (F) = 0.058
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2131 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1003100
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.058
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.029
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 1.30 0.290 ( 0.058) 0.029 0.261
2 0.17 1.30 0.290 ( 0.058) 0.029 0.261
3 0.25 1.10 0.245 ( 0.058) 0.025 0.221
4 0.33 1.50 0.335 ( 0.058) 0.033 0.301
5 0.42 1.50 0.335 ( 0.058) 0.033 0.301
6 0.50 1.80 0.402 ( 0.058) 0.040 0.361
7 0.58 1.50 0.335 ( 0.058) 0.033 0.301
8 0.67 1.80 0.402 ( 0.058) 0.040 0.361
9 0.75 1.80 0.402 ( 0.058) 0.040 0.361
10 0.83 1.50 0.335 ( 0.058) 0.033 0.301
11 0.92 1.60 0.357 ( 0.058) 0.036 0.321
12 1.00 1.80 0.402 ( 0.058) 0.040 0.361
13 1.08 2.20 0.491 ( 0.058) 0.049 0.442
14 1.17 2.20 0.491 ( 0.058) 0.049 0.442
15 1.25 2.20 0.491 ( 0.058) 0.049 0.442
16 1.33 2.00 0.446 ( 0.058) 0.045 0.402
17 1.42 2.60 0.580 ( 0.058) 0.058 0.522
18 1.50 2.70 0.602 0.058 ( 0.060) 0.544
19 1.58 2.40 0.536 ( 0.058) 0.054 0.482
20 1.67 2.70 0.602 0.058 ( 0.060) 0.544
21 1.75 3.30 0.736 0.058 ( 0.074) 0.678
22 1.83 3.10 0.692 0.058 ( 0.069) 0.634
23 1.92 2.90 0.647 0.058 ( 0.065) 0.589
24 2.00 3.00 0.669 0.058 ( 0.067) 0.611
25 2.08 3.10 0.692 0.058 ( 0.069) 0.634
26 2.17 4.20 0.937 0.058 ( 0.094) 0.879
27 2.25 5.00 1.116 0.058 ( 0.112) 1.058
28 2.33 3.50 0.781 0.058 ( 0.078) 0.723
29 2.42 6.80 1.517 0.058 ( 0.152) 1.459
30 2.50 7.30 1.629 0.058 ( 0.163) 1.571
31 2.58 8.20 1.830 0.058 ( 0.183) 1.772
32 2.67 5.90 1.316 0.058 ( 0.132) 1.258
33 2.75 2.00 0.446 ( 0.058) 0.045 0.402
34 2.83 1.80 0.402 ( 0.058) 0.040 0.361
35 2.92 1.80 0.402 ( 0.058) 0.040 0.361
36 3.00 0.60 0.134 ( 0.058) 0.013 0.120
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 20.6
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 1.72(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 9.6(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.14(In)
Total soil loss = 0.777(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 1.86(In)
Flood volume = 419079.2 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 33833.6 Cubic Feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2132 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1003100
Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 103.548(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0251 3.64 Q | | | |
0+10 0.1094 12.24 V Q | | | |
0+15 0.2080 14.32 V Q | | | |
0+20 0.3136 15.33 |V Q | | | |
0+25 0.4392 18.24 |V Q | | | |
0+30 0.5779 20.14 | V Q | | | |
0+35 0.7280 21.81 | VQ | | | |
0+40 0.8770 21.63 | VQ | | | |
0+45 1.0380 23.37 | Q | | | |
0+50 1.1968 23.07 | Q | | | |
0+55 1.3459 21.65 | QV | | | |
1+ 0 1.5000 22.38 | Q V | | | |
1+ 5 1.6710 24.83 | Q V | | | |
1+10 1.8627 27.83 | Q V | | | |
1+15 2.0613 28.83 | Q V | | | |
1+20 2.2591 28.72 | Q V| | | |
1+25 2.4611 29.32 | Q V | | |
1+30 2.6910 33.38 | Q |V | | |
1+35 2.9279 34.40 | Q | V | | |
1+40 3.1617 33.95 | Q | V | | |
1+45 3.4206 37.59 | Q | V | | |
1+50 3.7095 41.94 | Q | V | | |
1+55 3.9950 41.46 | Q | V | | |
2+ 0 4.2749 40.64 | Q | V | | |
2+ 5 4.5602 41.43 | Q | V | | |
2+10 4.8751 45.73 | Q| V | |
2+15 5.2651 56.63 | |Q |V | |
2+20 5.6816 60.48 | | Q | V | |
2+25 6.1133 62.68 | | Q | V | |
2+30 6.7095 86.57 | | Q | V | |
2+35 7.3973 99.87 | | Q| V |
2+40 8.1105 103.55 | | Q | V |
2+45 8.6543 78.97 | | Q | | V |
2+50 8.9795 47.23 | Q| | | V |
2+55 9.2275 36.01 | Q | | | V |
3+ 0 9.4204 28.01 | Q | | | V|
3+ 5 9.5268 15.45 | Q | | | V|
3+10 9.5762 7.18 |Q | | | V|
3+15 9.6004 3.51 Q | | | V|
3+20 9.6113 1.59 Q | | | V|
3+25 9.6172 0.85 Q | | | V|
3+30 9.6201 0.42 Q | | | V|
3+35 9.6207 0.10 Q | | | V|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2133 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1006100
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR1006100.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 100-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 6 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.15 77.16
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 2.50 167.75
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 100.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 1.150(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 2.500(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 2.500(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.98 %
Adjusted average point rain = 2.499(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-3 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 74.8 0.305 0.900 0.058 1.000 0.058
Sum (F) = 0.058
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2134 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1006100
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.058
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.029
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 0.50 0.150 ( 0.058) 0.015 0.135
2 0.17 0.60 0.180 ( 0.058) 0.018 0.162
3 0.25 0.60 0.180 ( 0.058) 0.018 0.162
4 0.33 0.60 0.180 ( 0.058) 0.018 0.162
5 0.42 0.60 0.180 ( 0.058) 0.018 0.162
6 0.50 0.70 0.210 ( 0.058) 0.021 0.189
7 0.58 0.70 0.210 ( 0.058) 0.021 0.189
8 0.67 0.70 0.210 ( 0.058) 0.021 0.189
9 0.75 0.70 0.210 ( 0.058) 0.021 0.189
10 0.83 0.70 0.210 ( 0.058) 0.021 0.189
11 0.92 0.70 0.210 ( 0.058) 0.021 0.189
12 1.00 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
13 1.08 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
14 1.17 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
15 1.25 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
16 1.33 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
17 1.42 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
18 1.50 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
19 1.58 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
20 1.67 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
21 1.75 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
22 1.83 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
23 1.92 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
24 2.00 0.90 0.270 ( 0.058) 0.027 0.243
25 2.08 0.80 0.240 ( 0.058) 0.024 0.216
26 2.17 0.90 0.270 ( 0.058) 0.027 0.243
27 2.25 0.90 0.270 ( 0.058) 0.027 0.243
28 2.33 0.90 0.270 ( 0.058) 0.027 0.243
29 2.42 0.90 0.270 ( 0.058) 0.027 0.243
30 2.50 0.90 0.270 ( 0.058) 0.027 0.243
31 2.58 0.90 0.270 ( 0.058) 0.027 0.243
32 2.67 0.90 0.270 ( 0.058) 0.027 0.243
33 2.75 1.00 0.300 ( 0.058) 0.030 0.270
34 2.83 1.00 0.300 ( 0.058) 0.030 0.270
35 2.92 1.00 0.300 ( 0.058) 0.030 0.270
36 3.00 1.00 0.300 ( 0.058) 0.030 0.270
37 3.08 1.00 0.300 ( 0.058) 0.030 0.270
38 3.17 1.10 0.330 ( 0.058) 0.033 0.297
39 3.25 1.10 0.330 ( 0.058) 0.033 0.297
40 3.33 1.10 0.330 ( 0.058) 0.033 0.297
41 3.42 1.20 0.360 ( 0.058) 0.036 0.324
42 3.50 1.30 0.390 ( 0.058) 0.039 0.351
43 3.58 1.40 0.420 ( 0.058) 0.042 0.378
44 3.67 1.40 0.420 ( 0.058) 0.042 0.378
45 3.75 1.50 0.450 ( 0.058) 0.045 0.405
46 3.83 1.50 0.450 ( 0.058) 0.045 0.405
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2135 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1006100
47 3.92 1.60 0.480 ( 0.058) 0.048 0.432
48 4.00 1.60 0.480 ( 0.058) 0.048 0.432
49 4.08 1.70 0.510 ( 0.058) 0.051 0.459
50 4.17 1.80 0.540 ( 0.058) 0.054 0.486
51 4.25 1.90 0.570 ( 0.058) 0.057 0.513
52 4.33 2.00 0.600 0.058 ( 0.060) 0.542
53 4.42 2.10 0.630 0.058 ( 0.063) 0.572
54 4.50 2.10 0.630 0.058 ( 0.063) 0.572
55 4.58 2.20 0.660 0.058 ( 0.066) 0.602
56 4.67 2.30 0.690 0.058 ( 0.069) 0.632
57 4.75 2.40 0.720 0.058 ( 0.072) 0.662
58 4.83 2.40 0.720 0.058 ( 0.072) 0.662
59 4.92 2.50 0.750 0.058 ( 0.075) 0.692
60 5.00 2.60 0.780 0.058 ( 0.078) 0.722
61 5.08 3.10 0.930 0.058 ( 0.093) 0.872
62 5.17 3.60 1.080 0.058 ( 0.108) 1.022
63 5.25 3.90 1.170 0.058 ( 0.117) 1.112
64 5.33 4.20 1.260 0.058 ( 0.126) 1.202
65 5.42 4.70 1.410 0.058 ( 0.141) 1.352
66 5.50 5.60 1.680 0.058 ( 0.168) 1.622
67 5.58 1.90 0.570 ( 0.058) 0.057 0.513
68 5.67 0.90 0.270 ( 0.058) 0.027 0.243
69 5.75 0.60 0.180 ( 0.058) 0.018 0.162
70 5.83 0.50 0.150 ( 0.058) 0.015 0.135
71 5.92 0.30 0.090 ( 0.058) 0.009 0.081
72 6.00 0.20 0.060 ( 0.058) 0.006 0.054
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 27.5
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 2.29(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 12.8(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.21(In)
Total soil loss = 1.164(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 2.50(In)
Flood volume = 558070.0 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 50722.1 Cubic Feet
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 89.787(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 6 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 22.5 45.0 67.5 90.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0130 1.88 Q | | | |
0+10 0.0591 6.70 V Q | | | |
0+15 0.1208 8.96 V Q | | | |
0+20 0.1887 9.86 V Q | | | |
0+25 0.2599 10.33 V Q | | | |
0+30 0.3356 11.00 |V Q | | | |
0+35 0.4187 12.06 |V Q | | | |
0+40 0.5046 12.48 |V Q | | | |
0+45 0.5915 12.62 |V Q | | | |
0+50 0.6790 12.69 | V Q | | | |
0+55 0.7667 12.74 | V Q | | | |
1+ 0 0.8572 13.14 | V Q | | | |
1+ 5 0.9539 14.05 | V Q | | | |
1+10 1.0526 14.32 | V Q | | | |
1+15 1.1521 14.45 | V Q | | | |
1+20 1.2521 14.52 | V Q | | | |
1+25 1.3524 14.56 | V Q | | | |
1+30 1.4528 14.59 | V Q | | | |
1+35 1.5535 14.61 | V Q | | | |
1+40 1.6541 14.61 | VQ | | | |
1+45 1.7547 14.61 | VQ | | | |
1+50 1.8553 14.61 | VQ | | | |
1+55 1.9560 14.61 | Q | | | |
2+ 0 2.0592 14.99 | Q | | | |
2+ 5 2.1659 15.50 | Q | | | |
2+10 2.2710 15.26 | QV | | | |
2+15 2.3812 16.00 | Q | | | |
2+20 2.4929 16.22 | Q | | | |
2+25 2.6053 16.32 | QV | | | |
2+30 2.7181 16.37 | QV | | | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2136 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR1006100
2+35 2.8311 16.41 | QV | | | |
2+40 2.9441 16.42 | Q V| | | |
2+45 3.0599 16.81 | Q V| | | |
2+50 3.1819 17.70 | Q V| | | |
2+55 3.3057 17.98 | Q V | | |
3+ 0 3.4303 18.10 | Q V | | |
3+ 5 3.5555 18.17 | Q |V | | |
3+10 3.6835 18.59 | Q |V | | |
3+15 3.8179 19.51 | Q |V | | |
3+20 3.9542 19.80 | Q | V | | |
3+25 4.0941 20.30 | Q| V | | |
3+30 4.2431 21.64 | Q| V | | |
3+35 4.4030 23.22 | Q V | | |
3+40 4.5720 24.54 | Q V | | |
3+45 4.7470 25.40 | |Q V | | |
3+50 4.9297 26.53 | |Q V | | |
3+55 5.1178 27.32 | | Q V | | |
4+ 0 5.3136 28.43 | | Q V | | |
4+ 5 5.5147 29.20 | | Q V | | |
4+10 5.7258 30.65 | | Q V | | |
4+15 5.9482 32.29 | | Q V | | |
4+20 6.1826 34.05 | | Q V| | |
4+25 6.4300 35.91 | | Q V | |
4+30 6.6879 37.45 | | Q V | |
4+35 6.9527 38.45 | | Q |V | |
4+40 7.2293 40.16 | | Q | V | |
4+45 7.5189 42.05 | | Q | V | |
4+50 7.8190 43.58 | | Q| V | |
4+55 8.1260 44.57 | | Q| V | |
5+ 0 8.4446 46.26 | | Q V | |
5+ 5 8.7876 49.80 | | | Q V | |
5+10 9.1828 57.38 | | | Q V | |
5+15 9.6329 65.36 | | | QV |
5+20 10.1284 71.94 | | | |Q |
5+25 10.6730 79.07 | | | | V Q |
5+30 11.2913 89.79 | | | | V Q|
5+35 11.8822 85.80 | | | | VQ |
5+40 12.2238 49.60 | | | Q | V |
5+45 12.4328 30.34 | | Q | | V |
5+50 12.5742 20.54 | Q| | | V|
5+55 12.6751 14.65 | Q | | | V|
6+ 0 12.7420 9.72 | Q | | | V|
6+ 5 12.7825 5.87 | Q | | | V|
6+10 12.7976 2.19 Q | | | V|
6+15 12.8048 1.04 Q | | | V|
6+20 12.8085 0.54 Q | | | V|
6+25 12.8104 0.28 Q | | | V|
6+30 12.8112 0.12 Q | | | V|
6+35 12.8115 0.04 Q | | | V|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2137 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
U n i t H y d r o g r a p h A n a l y s i s
Copyright (c) CIVILCADD/CIVILDESIGN, 1989 - 2014, Version 9.0 Study date 07/31/20 File: 3828PR10024100.out
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Riverside County Synthetic Unit Hydrology Method
RCFC & WCD Manual date - April 1978
Program License Serial Number 6400
--------------------------------------------------------------------- English (in-lb) Input Units Used
English Rainfall Data (Inches) Input Values Used
English Units used in output format
--------------------------------------------------------------------- TEI JOB 3828
OPTION 1 - HIGH CUBE
PROPOSED CONDITION 100-YEAR STORM EVENT
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Drainage Area = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Drainage Area for Depth-Area Areal Adjustment = 67.10(Ac.) = 0.105 Sq. Mi.
Length along longest watercourse = 3400.00(Ft.)
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 1280.00(Ft.) Length along longest watercourse = 0.644 Mi.
Length along longest watercourse measured to centroid = 0.242 Mi.
Difference in elevation = 44.00(Ft.)
Slope along watercourse = 68.3294 Ft./Mi.
Average Manning's 'N' = 0.015
Lag time = 0.080 Hr.
Lag time = 4.78 Min.
25% of lag time = 1.19 Min.
40% of lag time = 1.91 Min.
Unit time = 5.00 Min.
Duration of storm = 24 Hour(s)
User Entered Base Flow = 0.00(CFS)
2 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 1.75 117.42
100 YEAR Area rainfall data:
Area(Ac.)[1] Rainfall(In)[2] Weighting[1*2]
67.10 4.50 301.95
STORM EVENT (YEAR) = 100.00
Area Averaged 2-Year Rainfall = 1.750(In)
Area Averaged 100-Year Rainfall = 4.500(In)
Point rain (area averaged) = 4.500(In)
Areal adjustment factor = 99.99 %
Adjusted average point rain = 4.499(In)
Sub-Area Data:
Area(Ac.) Runoff Index Impervious %
67.100 56.00 0.900
Total Area Entered = 67.10(Ac.)
RI RI Infil. Rate Impervious Adj. Infil. Rate Area% F
AMC2 AMC-3 (In/Hr) (Dec.%) (In/Hr) (Dec.) (In/Hr)
56.0 74.8 0.305 0.900 0.058 1.000 0.058
Sum (F) = 0.058
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2138 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
Area averaged mean soil loss (F) (In/Hr) = 0.058
Minimum soil loss rate ((In/Hr)) = 0.029
(for 24 hour storm duration)
Soil low loss rate (decimal) = 0.100
--------------------------------------------------------------------- U n i t H y d r o g r a p h
VALLEY S-Curve
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit Hydrograph Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Unit time period Time % of lag Distribution Unit Hydrograph (hrs) Graph % (CFS)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 0.083 104.614 20.612 13.939
2 0.167 209.229 48.679 32.919
3 0.250 313.843 14.978 10.129
4 0.333 418.458 6.821 4.613
5 0.417 523.072 3.802 2.571
6 0.500 627.687 2.435 1.647
7 0.583 732.301 1.462 0.989
8 0.667 836.916 1.210 0.818
Sum = 100.000 Sum= 67.624
----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following loss rate calculations reflect use of the minimum calculated loss rate subtracted from the Storm Rain to produce the maximum Effective Rain value Unit Time Pattern Storm Rain Loss rate(In./Hr) Effective (Hr.) Percent (In/Hr) Max | Low (In/Hr)
1 0.08 0.07 0.036 ( 0.103) 0.004 0.032
2 0.17 0.07 0.036 ( 0.102) 0.004 0.032
3 0.25 0.07 0.036 ( 0.102) 0.004 0.032
4 0.33 0.10 0.054 ( 0.102) 0.005 0.049
5 0.42 0.10 0.054 ( 0.101) 0.005 0.049
6 0.50 0.10 0.054 ( 0.101) 0.005 0.049
7 0.58 0.10 0.054 ( 0.100) 0.005 0.049
8 0.67 0.10 0.054 ( 0.100) 0.005 0.049
9 0.75 0.10 0.054 ( 0.100) 0.005 0.049
10 0.83 0.13 0.072 ( 0.099) 0.007 0.065
11 0.92 0.13 0.072 ( 0.099) 0.007 0.065
12 1.00 0.13 0.072 ( 0.099) 0.007 0.065
13 1.08 0.10 0.054 ( 0.098) 0.005 0.049
14 1.17 0.10 0.054 ( 0.098) 0.005 0.049
15 1.25 0.10 0.054 ( 0.097) 0.005 0.049
16 1.33 0.10 0.054 ( 0.097) 0.005 0.049
17 1.42 0.10 0.054 ( 0.097) 0.005 0.049
18 1.50 0.10 0.054 ( 0.096) 0.005 0.049
19 1.58 0.10 0.054 ( 0.096) 0.005 0.049
20 1.67 0.10 0.054 ( 0.095) 0.005 0.049
21 1.75 0.10 0.054 ( 0.095) 0.005 0.049
22 1.83 0.13 0.072 ( 0.095) 0.007 0.065
23 1.92 0.13 0.072 ( 0.094) 0.007 0.065
24 2.00 0.13 0.072 ( 0.094) 0.007 0.065
25 2.08 0.13 0.072 ( 0.094) 0.007 0.065
26 2.17 0.13 0.072 ( 0.093) 0.007 0.065
27 2.25 0.13 0.072 ( 0.093) 0.007 0.065
28 2.33 0.13 0.072 ( 0.092) 0.007 0.065
29 2.42 0.13 0.072 ( 0.092) 0.007 0.065
30 2.50 0.13 0.072 ( 0.092) 0.007 0.065
31 2.58 0.17 0.090 ( 0.091) 0.009 0.081
32 2.67 0.17 0.090 ( 0.091) 0.009 0.081
33 2.75 0.17 0.090 ( 0.091) 0.009 0.081
34 2.83 0.17 0.090 ( 0.090) 0.009 0.081
35 2.92 0.17 0.090 ( 0.090) 0.009 0.081
36 3.00 0.17 0.090 ( 0.089) 0.009 0.081
37 3.08 0.17 0.090 ( 0.089) 0.009 0.081
38 3.17 0.17 0.090 ( 0.089) 0.009 0.081
39 3.25 0.17 0.090 ( 0.088) 0.009 0.081
40 3.33 0.17 0.090 ( 0.088) 0.009 0.081
41 3.42 0.17 0.090 ( 0.088) 0.009 0.081
42 3.50 0.17 0.090 ( 0.087) 0.009 0.081
43 3.58 0.17 0.090 ( 0.087) 0.009 0.081
44 3.67 0.17 0.090 ( 0.086) 0.009 0.081
45 3.75 0.17 0.090 ( 0.086) 0.009 0.081
46 3.83 0.20 0.108 ( 0.086) 0.011 0.097
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2139 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
47 3.92 0.20 0.108 ( 0.085) 0.011 0.097
48 4.00 0.20 0.108 ( 0.085) 0.011 0.097
49 4.08 0.20 0.108 ( 0.085) 0.011 0.097
50 4.17 0.20 0.108 ( 0.084) 0.011 0.097
51 4.25 0.20 0.108 ( 0.084) 0.011 0.097
52 4.33 0.23 0.126 ( 0.084) 0.013 0.113
53 4.42 0.23 0.126 ( 0.083) 0.013 0.113
54 4.50 0.23 0.126 ( 0.083) 0.013 0.113
55 4.58 0.23 0.126 ( 0.082) 0.013 0.113
56 4.67 0.23 0.126 ( 0.082) 0.013 0.113
57 4.75 0.23 0.126 ( 0.082) 0.013 0.113
58 4.83 0.27 0.144 ( 0.081) 0.014 0.130
59 4.92 0.27 0.144 ( 0.081) 0.014 0.130
60 5.00 0.27 0.144 ( 0.081) 0.014 0.130
61 5.08 0.20 0.108 ( 0.080) 0.011 0.097
62 5.17 0.20 0.108 ( 0.080) 0.011 0.097
63 5.25 0.20 0.108 ( 0.080) 0.011 0.097
64 5.33 0.23 0.126 ( 0.079) 0.013 0.113
65 5.42 0.23 0.126 ( 0.079) 0.013 0.113
66 5.50 0.23 0.126 ( 0.079) 0.013 0.113
67 5.58 0.27 0.144 ( 0.078) 0.014 0.130
68 5.67 0.27 0.144 ( 0.078) 0.014 0.130
69 5.75 0.27 0.144 ( 0.078) 0.014 0.130
70 5.83 0.27 0.144 ( 0.077) 0.014 0.130
71 5.92 0.27 0.144 ( 0.077) 0.014 0.130
72 6.00 0.27 0.144 ( 0.077) 0.014 0.130
73 6.08 0.30 0.162 ( 0.076) 0.016 0.146
74 6.17 0.30 0.162 ( 0.076) 0.016 0.146
75 6.25 0.30 0.162 ( 0.076) 0.016 0.146
76 6.33 0.30 0.162 ( 0.075) 0.016 0.146
77 6.42 0.30 0.162 ( 0.075) 0.016 0.146
78 6.50 0.30 0.162 ( 0.075) 0.016 0.146
79 6.58 0.33 0.180 ( 0.074) 0.018 0.162
80 6.67 0.33 0.180 ( 0.074) 0.018 0.162
81 6.75 0.33 0.180 ( 0.074) 0.018 0.162
82 6.83 0.33 0.180 ( 0.073) 0.018 0.162
83 6.92 0.33 0.180 ( 0.073) 0.018 0.162
84 7.00 0.33 0.180 ( 0.073) 0.018 0.162
85 7.08 0.33 0.180 ( 0.072) 0.018 0.162
86 7.17 0.33 0.180 ( 0.072) 0.018 0.162
87 7.25 0.33 0.180 ( 0.072) 0.018 0.162
88 7.33 0.37 0.198 ( 0.071) 0.020 0.178
89 7.42 0.37 0.198 ( 0.071) 0.020 0.178
90 7.50 0.37 0.198 ( 0.071) 0.020 0.178
91 7.58 0.40 0.216 ( 0.070) 0.022 0.194
92 7.67 0.40 0.216 ( 0.070) 0.022 0.194
93 7.75 0.40 0.216 ( 0.070) 0.022 0.194
94 7.83 0.43 0.234 ( 0.069) 0.023 0.211
95 7.92 0.43 0.234 ( 0.069) 0.023 0.211
96 8.00 0.43 0.234 ( 0.069) 0.023 0.211
97 8.08 0.50 0.270 ( 0.068) 0.027 0.243
98 8.17 0.50 0.270 ( 0.068) 0.027 0.243
99 8.25 0.50 0.270 ( 0.068) 0.027 0.243
100 8.33 0.50 0.270 ( 0.067) 0.027 0.243
101 8.42 0.50 0.270 ( 0.067) 0.027 0.243
102 8.50 0.50 0.270 ( 0.067) 0.027 0.243
103 8.58 0.53 0.288 ( 0.066) 0.029 0.259
104 8.67 0.53 0.288 ( 0.066) 0.029 0.259
105 8.75 0.53 0.288 ( 0.066) 0.029 0.259
106 8.83 0.57 0.306 ( 0.066) 0.031 0.275
107 8.92 0.57 0.306 ( 0.065) 0.031 0.275
108 9.00 0.57 0.306 ( 0.065) 0.031 0.275
109 9.08 0.63 0.342 ( 0.065) 0.034 0.308
110 9.17 0.63 0.342 ( 0.064) 0.034 0.308
111 9.25 0.63 0.342 ( 0.064) 0.034 0.308
112 9.33 0.67 0.360 ( 0.064) 0.036 0.324
113 9.42 0.67 0.360 ( 0.063) 0.036 0.324
114 9.50 0.67 0.360 ( 0.063) 0.036 0.324
115 9.58 0.70 0.378 ( 0.063) 0.038 0.340
116 9.67 0.70 0.378 ( 0.062) 0.038 0.340
117 9.75 0.70 0.378 ( 0.062) 0.038 0.340
118 9.83 0.73 0.396 ( 0.062) 0.040 0.356
119 9.92 0.73 0.396 ( 0.062) 0.040 0.356
120 10.00 0.73 0.396 ( 0.061) 0.040 0.356
121 10.08 0.50 0.270 ( 0.061) 0.027 0.243
122 10.17 0.50 0.270 ( 0.061) 0.027 0.243
123 10.25 0.50 0.270 ( 0.060) 0.027 0.243
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2140 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
124 10.33 0.50 0.270 ( 0.060) 0.027 0.243
125 10.42 0.50 0.270 ( 0.060) 0.027 0.243
126 10.50 0.50 0.270 ( 0.060) 0.027 0.243
127 10.58 0.67 0.360 ( 0.059) 0.036 0.324
128 10.67 0.67 0.360 ( 0.059) 0.036 0.324
129 10.75 0.67 0.360 ( 0.059) 0.036 0.324
130 10.83 0.67 0.360 ( 0.058) 0.036 0.324
131 10.92 0.67 0.360 ( 0.058) 0.036 0.324
132 11.00 0.67 0.360 ( 0.058) 0.036 0.324
133 11.08 0.63 0.342 ( 0.057) 0.034 0.308
134 11.17 0.63 0.342 ( 0.057) 0.034 0.308
135 11.25 0.63 0.342 ( 0.057) 0.034 0.308
136 11.33 0.63 0.342 ( 0.057) 0.034 0.308
137 11.42 0.63 0.342 ( 0.056) 0.034 0.308
138 11.50 0.63 0.342 ( 0.056) 0.034 0.308
139 11.58 0.57 0.306 ( 0.056) 0.031 0.275
140 11.67 0.57 0.306 ( 0.056) 0.031 0.275
141 11.75 0.57 0.306 ( 0.055) 0.031 0.275
142 11.83 0.60 0.324 ( 0.055) 0.032 0.292
143 11.92 0.60 0.324 ( 0.055) 0.032 0.292
144 12.00 0.60 0.324 ( 0.054) 0.032 0.292
145 12.08 0.83 0.450 ( 0.054) 0.045 0.405
146 12.17 0.83 0.450 ( 0.054) 0.045 0.405
147 12.25 0.83 0.450 ( 0.054) 0.045 0.405
148 12.33 0.87 0.468 ( 0.053) 0.047 0.421
149 12.42 0.87 0.468 ( 0.053) 0.047 0.421
150 12.50 0.87 0.468 ( 0.053) 0.047 0.421
151 12.58 0.93 0.504 ( 0.053) 0.050 0.454
152 12.67 0.93 0.504 ( 0.052) 0.050 0.454
153 12.75 0.93 0.504 ( 0.052) 0.050 0.454
154 12.83 0.97 0.522 0.052 ( 0.052) 0.470
155 12.92 0.97 0.522 0.051 ( 0.052) 0.470
156 13.00 0.97 0.522 0.051 ( 0.052) 0.471
157 13.08 1.13 0.612 0.051 ( 0.061) 0.561
158 13.17 1.13 0.612 0.051 ( 0.061) 0.561
159 13.25 1.13 0.612 0.050 ( 0.061) 0.561
160 13.33 1.13 0.612 0.050 ( 0.061) 0.562
161 13.42 1.13 0.612 0.050 ( 0.061) 0.562
162 13.50 1.13 0.612 0.050 ( 0.061) 0.562
163 13.58 0.77 0.414 ( 0.049) 0.041 0.373
164 13.67 0.77 0.414 ( 0.049) 0.041 0.373
165 13.75 0.77 0.414 ( 0.049) 0.041 0.373
166 13.83 0.77 0.414 ( 0.049) 0.041 0.373
167 13.92 0.77 0.414 ( 0.048) 0.041 0.373
168 14.00 0.77 0.414 ( 0.048) 0.041 0.373
169 14.08 0.90 0.486 0.048 ( 0.049) 0.438
170 14.17 0.90 0.486 0.048 ( 0.049) 0.438
171 14.25 0.90 0.486 0.047 ( 0.049) 0.438
172 14.33 0.87 0.468 ( 0.047) 0.047 0.421
173 14.42 0.87 0.468 ( 0.047) 0.047 0.421
174 14.50 0.87 0.468 0.047 ( 0.047) 0.421
175 14.58 0.87 0.468 0.046 ( 0.047) 0.421
176 14.67 0.87 0.468 0.046 ( 0.047) 0.422
177 14.75 0.87 0.468 0.046 ( 0.047) 0.422
178 14.83 0.83 0.450 ( 0.046) 0.045 0.405
179 14.92 0.83 0.450 ( 0.046) 0.045 0.405
180 15.00 0.83 0.450 ( 0.045) 0.045 0.405
181 15.08 0.80 0.432 ( 0.045) 0.043 0.389
182 15.17 0.80 0.432 ( 0.045) 0.043 0.389
183 15.25 0.80 0.432 ( 0.045) 0.043 0.389
184 15.33 0.77 0.414 ( 0.044) 0.041 0.373
185 15.42 0.77 0.414 ( 0.044) 0.041 0.373
186 15.50 0.77 0.414 ( 0.044) 0.041 0.373
187 15.58 0.63 0.342 ( 0.044) 0.034 0.308
188 15.67 0.63 0.342 ( 0.043) 0.034 0.308
189 15.75 0.63 0.342 ( 0.043) 0.034 0.308
190 15.83 0.63 0.342 ( 0.043) 0.034 0.308
191 15.92 0.63 0.342 ( 0.043) 0.034 0.308
192 16.00 0.63 0.342 ( 0.043) 0.034 0.308
193 16.08 0.13 0.072 ( 0.042) 0.007 0.065
194 16.17 0.13 0.072 ( 0.042) 0.007 0.065
195 16.25 0.13 0.072 ( 0.042) 0.007 0.065
196 16.33 0.13 0.072 ( 0.042) 0.007 0.065
197 16.42 0.13 0.072 ( 0.042) 0.007 0.065
198 16.50 0.13 0.072 ( 0.041) 0.007 0.065
199 16.58 0.10 0.054 ( 0.041) 0.005 0.049
200 16.67 0.10 0.054 ( 0.041) 0.005 0.049
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2141 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
201 16.75 0.10 0.054 ( 0.041) 0.005 0.049
202 16.83 0.10 0.054 ( 0.040) 0.005 0.049
203 16.92 0.10 0.054 ( 0.040) 0.005 0.049
204 17.00 0.10 0.054 ( 0.040) 0.005 0.049
205 17.08 0.17 0.090 ( 0.040) 0.009 0.081
206 17.17 0.17 0.090 ( 0.040) 0.009 0.081
207 17.25 0.17 0.090 ( 0.039) 0.009 0.081
208 17.33 0.17 0.090 ( 0.039) 0.009 0.081
209 17.42 0.17 0.090 ( 0.039) 0.009 0.081
210 17.50 0.17 0.090 ( 0.039) 0.009 0.081
211 17.58 0.17 0.090 ( 0.039) 0.009 0.081
212 17.67 0.17 0.090 ( 0.038) 0.009 0.081
213 17.75 0.17 0.090 ( 0.038) 0.009 0.081
214 17.83 0.13 0.072 ( 0.038) 0.007 0.065
215 17.92 0.13 0.072 ( 0.038) 0.007 0.065
216 18.00 0.13 0.072 ( 0.038) 0.007 0.065
217 18.08 0.13 0.072 ( 0.038) 0.007 0.065
218 18.17 0.13 0.072 ( 0.037) 0.007 0.065
219 18.25 0.13 0.072 ( 0.037) 0.007 0.065
220 18.33 0.13 0.072 ( 0.037) 0.007 0.065
221 18.42 0.13 0.072 ( 0.037) 0.007 0.065
222 18.50 0.13 0.072 ( 0.037) 0.007 0.065
223 18.58 0.10 0.054 ( 0.036) 0.005 0.049
224 18.67 0.10 0.054 ( 0.036) 0.005 0.049
225 18.75 0.10 0.054 ( 0.036) 0.005 0.049
226 18.83 0.07 0.036 ( 0.036) 0.004 0.032
227 18.92 0.07 0.036 ( 0.036) 0.004 0.032
228 19.00 0.07 0.036 ( 0.036) 0.004 0.032
229 19.08 0.10 0.054 ( 0.035) 0.005 0.049
230 19.17 0.10 0.054 ( 0.035) 0.005 0.049
231 19.25 0.10 0.054 ( 0.035) 0.005 0.049
232 19.33 0.13 0.072 ( 0.035) 0.007 0.065
233 19.42 0.13 0.072 ( 0.035) 0.007 0.065
234 19.50 0.13 0.072 ( 0.035) 0.007 0.065
235 19.58 0.10 0.054 ( 0.034) 0.005 0.049
236 19.67 0.10 0.054 ( 0.034) 0.005 0.049
237 19.75 0.10 0.054 ( 0.034) 0.005 0.049
238 19.83 0.07 0.036 ( 0.034) 0.004 0.032
239 19.92 0.07 0.036 ( 0.034) 0.004 0.032
240 20.00 0.07 0.036 ( 0.034) 0.004 0.032
241 20.08 0.10 0.054 ( 0.034) 0.005 0.049
242 20.17 0.10 0.054 ( 0.033) 0.005 0.049
243 20.25 0.10 0.054 ( 0.033) 0.005 0.049
244 20.33 0.10 0.054 ( 0.033) 0.005 0.049
245 20.42 0.10 0.054 ( 0.033) 0.005 0.049
246 20.50 0.10 0.054 ( 0.033) 0.005 0.049
247 20.58 0.10 0.054 ( 0.033) 0.005 0.049
248 20.67 0.10 0.054 ( 0.033) 0.005 0.049
249 20.75 0.10 0.054 ( 0.032) 0.005 0.049
250 20.83 0.07 0.036 ( 0.032) 0.004 0.032
251 20.92 0.07 0.036 ( 0.032) 0.004 0.032
252 21.00 0.07 0.036 ( 0.032) 0.004 0.032
253 21.08 0.10 0.054 ( 0.032) 0.005 0.049
254 21.17 0.10 0.054 ( 0.032) 0.005 0.049
255 21.25 0.10 0.054 ( 0.032) 0.005 0.049
256 21.33 0.07 0.036 ( 0.032) 0.004 0.032
257 21.42 0.07 0.036 ( 0.031) 0.004 0.032
258 21.50 0.07 0.036 ( 0.031) 0.004 0.032
259 21.58 0.10 0.054 ( 0.031) 0.005 0.049
260 21.67 0.10 0.054 ( 0.031) 0.005 0.049
261 21.75 0.10 0.054 ( 0.031) 0.005 0.049
262 21.83 0.07 0.036 ( 0.031) 0.004 0.032
263 21.92 0.07 0.036 ( 0.031) 0.004 0.032
264 22.00 0.07 0.036 ( 0.031) 0.004 0.032
265 22.08 0.10 0.054 ( 0.031) 0.005 0.049
266 22.17 0.10 0.054 ( 0.030) 0.005 0.049
267 22.25 0.10 0.054 ( 0.030) 0.005 0.049
268 22.33 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
269 22.42 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
270 22.50 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
271 22.58 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
272 22.67 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
273 22.75 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
274 22.83 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
275 22.92 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
276 23.00 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
277 23.08 0.07 0.036 ( 0.030) 0.004 0.032
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2142 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
278 23.17 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
279 23.25 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
280 23.33 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
281 23.42 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
282 23.50 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
283 23.58 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
284 23.67 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
285 23.75 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
286 23.83 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
287 23.92 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
288 24.00 0.07 0.036 ( 0.029) 0.004 0.032
(Loss Rate Not Used)
Sum = 100.0 Sum = 48.7
Flood volume = Effective rainfall 4.06(In)
times area 67.1(Ac.)/[(In)/(Ft.)] = 22.7(Ac.Ft)
Total soil loss = 0.44(In)
Total soil loss = 2.483(Ac.Ft)
Total rainfall = 4.50(In)
Flood volume = 987794.6 Cubic Feet
Total soil loss = 108140.2 Cubic Feet
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Peak flow rate of this hydrograph = 37.852(CFS)
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 24 - H O U R S T O R M
R u n o f f H y d r o g r a p h
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Hydrograph in 5 Minute intervals ((CFS))
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Time(h+m) Volume Ac.Ft Q(CFS) 0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------- 0+ 5 0.0031 0.45 Q | | | |
0+10 0.0136 1.52 VQ | | | |
0+15 0.0263 1.85 VQ | | | |
0+20 0.0416 2.22 V Q | | | |
0+25 0.0612 2.84 V Q | | | |
0+30 0.0822 3.06 V Q | | | |
0+35 0.1040 3.16 V Q | | | |
0+40 0.1263 3.23 V Q | | | |
0+45 0.1487 3.26 V Q | | | |
0+50 0.1728 3.50 V Q | | | |
0+55 0.2007 4.05 V Q | | | |
1+ 0 0.2297 4.21 V Q | | | |
1+ 5 0.2576 4.06 V Q | | | |
1+10 0.2822 3.57 V Q | | | |
1+15 0.3058 3.43 V Q | | | |
1+20 0.3291 3.37 V Q | | | |
1+25 0.3521 3.34 V Q | | | |
1+30 0.3749 3.32 V Q | | | |
1+35 0.3977 3.30 V Q | | | |
1+40 0.4203 3.29 V Q | | | |
1+45 0.4430 3.29 V Q | | | |
1+50 0.4672 3.51 V Q | | | |
1+55 0.4950 4.05 V Q | | | |
2+ 0 0.5240 4.21 V Q | | | |
2+ 5 0.5536 4.29 V Q | | | |
2+10 0.5834 4.33 |V Q | | | |
2+15 0.6134 4.35 |V Q | | | |
2+20 0.6435 4.37 |V Q | | | |
2+25 0.6736 4.38 |V Q | | | |
2+30 0.7038 4.38 |V Q | | | |
2+35 0.7356 4.61 |V Q | | | |
2+40 0.7710 5.14 |V Q | | | |
2+45 0.8076 5.31 |V Q | | | |
2+50 0.8446 5.38 |V Q | | | |
2+55 0.8820 5.42 |V Q | | | |
3+ 0 0.9195 5.45 |V Q | | | |
3+ 5 0.9572 5.47 |V Q | | | |
3+10 0.9949 5.48 |V Q | | | |
3+15 1.0326 5.48 |V Q | | | |
3+20 1.0704 5.48 |V Q | | | |
3+25 1.1081 5.48 |V Q | | | |
3+30 1.1459 5.48 | V Q | | | |
3+35 1.1836 5.48 | V Q | | | |
3+40 1.2213 5.48 | V Q | | | |
3+45 1.2591 5.48 | V Q | | | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2143 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
3+50 1.2984 5.71 | V Q | | | |
3+55 1.3413 6.24 | V Q | | | |
4+ 0 1.3854 6.40 | V Q | | | |
4+ 5 1.4300 6.48 | V Q | | | |
4+10 1.4749 6.52 | V Q | | | |
4+15 1.5200 6.55 | V Q | | | |
4+20 1.5668 6.79 | V Q | | | |
4+25 1.6173 7.33 | V Q | | | |
4+30 1.6689 7.50 | V Q | | | |
4+35 1.7211 7.57 | V Q | | | |
4+40 1.7736 7.62 | V Q | | | |
4+45 1.8262 7.64 | V Q | | | |
4+50 1.8805 7.88 | V Q | | | |
4+55 1.9386 8.43 | V Q | | | |
5+ 0 1.9977 8.60 | V Q | | | |
5+ 5 2.0543 8.22 | V Q | | | |
5+10 2.1039 7.19 | V Q | | | |
5+15 2.1513 6.89 | V Q | | | |
5+20 2.1994 6.98 | V Q | | | |
5+25 2.2507 7.45 | V Q | | | |
5+30 2.3028 7.56 | V Q | | | |
5+35 2.3567 7.83 | V Q | | | |
5+40 2.4144 8.37 | V Q | | | |
5+45 2.4733 8.57 | V Q | | | |
5+50 2.5330 8.66 | V Q | | | |
5+55 2.5930 8.71 | V Q | | | |
6+ 0 2.6531 8.74 | V Q | | | |
6+ 5 2.7150 8.98 | V Q | | | |
6+10 2.7806 9.53 | V Q| | | |
6+15 2.8473 9.69 | V Q| | | |
6+20 2.9146 9.77 | V Q| | | |
6+25 2.9821 9.81 | V Q| | | |
6+30 3.0499 9.83 | V Q| | | |
6+35 3.1193 10.08 | V Q | | |
6+40 3.1924 10.62 | V Q | | |
6+45 3.2667 10.79 | V Q | | |
6+50 3.3415 10.86 | V Q | | |
6+55 3.4166 10.90 | V Q | | |
7+ 0 3.4919 10.93 | V Q | | |
7+ 5 3.5673 10.95 | V Q | | |
7+10 3.6428 10.96 | V Q | | |
7+15 3.7182 10.96 | V Q | | |
7+20 3.7953 11.19 | V |Q | | |
7+25 3.8760 11.72 | V |Q | | |
7+30 3.9578 11.88 | V |Q | | |
7+35 4.0417 12.18 | V | Q | | |
7+40 4.1296 12.76 | V | Q | | |
7+45 4.2188 12.95 | V | Q | | |
7+50 4.3101 13.27 | V | Q | | |
7+55 4.4056 13.85 | V | Q | | |
8+ 0 4.5023 14.05 | V | Q | | |
8+ 5 4.6028 14.59 | V | Q | | |
8+10 4.7110 15.71 | V | Q | | |
8+15 4.8216 16.06 | V | Q | | |
8+20 4.9334 16.23 | V | Q | | |
8+25 5.0458 16.33 | V | Q | | |
8+30 5.1586 16.38 | V| Q | | |
8+35 5.2732 16.64 | V| Q | | |
8+40 5.3917 17.20 | V| Q | | |
8+45 5.5112 17.36 | V| Q | | |
8+50 5.6329 17.66 | V| Q | | |
8+55 5.7585 18.24 | V Q | | |
9+ 0 5.8854 18.43 | V Q | | |
9+ 5 6.0161 18.97 | V Q | | |
9+10 6.1545 20.09 | V Q | |
9+15 6.2953 20.45 | |V Q | |
9+20 6.4388 20.84 | |V Q | |
9+25 6.5867 21.47 | |V |Q | |
9+30 6.7361 21.69 | |V |Q | |
9+35 6.8877 22.02 | | V | Q | |
9+40 7.0435 22.62 | | V | Q | |
9+45 7.2006 22.81 | | V | Q | |
9+50 7.3599 23.13 | | V | Q | |
9+55 7.5233 23.72 | | V | Q | |
10+ 0 7.6879 23.91 | | V | Q | |
10+ 5 7.8423 22.42 | | V | Q | |
10+10 7.9714 18.74 | | V Q | | |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2144 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
10+15 8.0927 17.62 | | V Q | | |
10+20 8.2105 17.11 | | V Q | | |
10+25 8.3265 16.83 | | V Q | | |
10+30 8.4411 16.64 | | V Q | | |
10+35 8.5627 17.66 | | V Q | | |
10+40 8.7021 20.24 | | V Q | |
10+45 8.8471 21.06 | | V |Q | |
10+50 8.9947 21.43 | | V |Q | |
10+55 9.1437 21.64 | | V |Q | |
11+ 0 9.2937 21.77 | | V |Q | |
11+ 5 9.4426 21.63 | | V |Q | |
11+10 9.5883 21.16 | | V |Q | |
11+15 9.7329 21.00 | | V Q | |
11+20 9.8770 20.92 | | V Q | |
11+25 10.0208 20.88 | | V Q | |
11+30 10.1644 20.85 | | V Q | |
11+35 10.3048 20.38 | | V Q | |
11+40 10.4378 19.30 | | VQ| | |
11+45 10.5684 18.98 | | Q | | |
11+50 10.6997 19.05 | | VQ| | |
11+55 10.8340 19.50 | | Q| | |
12+ 0 10.9690 19.61 | | Q| | |
12+ 5 11.1153 21.24 | | V|Q | |
12+10 11.2874 24.99 | | V| Q | |
12+15 11.4676 26.16 | | V Q | |
12+20 11.6530 26.93 | | V Q | |
12+25 11.8442 27.77 | | V Q | |
12+30 12.0379 28.12 | | |V Q | |
12+35 12.2359 28.76 | | |V Q | |
12+40 12.4422 29.96 | | |V Q| |
12+45 12.6510 30.31 | | | V Q |
12+50 12.8625 30.71 | | | V Q |
12+55 13.0785 31.36 | | | V |Q |
13+ 0 13.2960 31.59 | | | V |Q |
13+ 5 13.5231 32.97 | | | V | Q |
13+10 13.7712 36.02 | | | V | Q |
13+15 14.0258 36.98 | | | V | Q |
13+20 14.2836 37.42 | | | V | Q |
13+25 14.5431 37.69 | | | V | Q |
13+30 14.8038 37.85 | | | V | Q |
13+35 15.0470 35.31 | | | V | Q |
13+40 15.2477 29.14 | | | V Q| |
13+45 15.4352 27.22 | | | Q | |
13+50 15.6166 26.35 | | | QV | |
13+55 15.7948 25.86 | | | Q V | |
14+ 0 15.9707 25.55 | | | Q V | |
14+ 5 16.1517 26.27 | | | Q V | |
14+10 16.3464 28.28 | | | Q | |
14+15 16.5458 28.95 | | | QV| |
14+20 16.7457 29.02 | | | Q| |
14+25 16.9428 28.62 | | | QV| |
14+30 17.1395 28.56 | | | Q V |
14+35 17.3361 28.55 | | | Q V |
14+40 17.5329 28.57 | | | Q V |
14+45 17.7296 28.56 | | | Q |V |
14+50 17.9246 28.32 | | | Q |V |
14+55 18.1157 27.75 | | | Q |V |
15+ 0 18.3056 27.58 | | | Q | V |
15+ 5 18.4934 27.27 | | | Q | V |
15+10 18.6773 26.70 | | | Q | V |
15+15 18.8599 26.51 | | | Q | V |
15+20 19.0402 26.19 | | | Q | V |
15+25 19.2165 25.60 | | | Q | V |
15+30 19.3915 25.41 | | | Q | V |
15+35 19.5596 24.41 | | | Q | V |
15+40 19.7127 22.22 | | | Q | V |
15+45 19.8611 21.54 | | |Q | V |
15+50 20.0073 21.23 | | |Q | V |
15+55 20.1522 21.05 | | |Q | V |
16+ 0 20.2964 20.94 | | Q | V |
16+ 5 20.4169 17.49 | | Q | | V |
16+10 20.4818 9.43 | Q| | | V |
16+15 20.5298 6.97 | Q | | | V |
16+20 20.5701 5.85 | Q | | | V |
16+25 20.6061 5.22 | Q | | | V |
16+30 20.6393 4.82 | Q | | | V |
16+35 20.6693 4.36 | Q | | | V |
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2145 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
16+40 20.6942 3.62 | Q | | | V |
16+45 20.7181 3.46 | Q | | | V |
16+50 20.7414 3.39 | Q | | | V |
16+55 20.7644 3.34 | Q | | | V |
17+ 0 20.7873 3.32 | Q | | | V |
17+ 5 20.8131 3.75 | Q | | | V |
17+10 20.8462 4.81 | Q | | | V |
17+15 20.8816 5.13 | Q | | | V |
17+20 20.9180 5.28 | Q | | | V |
17+25 20.9549 5.37 | Q | | | V |
17+30 20.9923 5.42 | Q | | | V |
17+35 21.0298 5.45 | Q | | | V |
17+40 21.0676 5.48 | Q | | | V |
17+45 21.1053 5.48 | Q | | | V |
17+50 21.1415 5.25 | Q | | | V |
17+55 21.1740 4.72 | Q | | | V |
18+ 0 21.2054 4.56 | Q | | | V |
18+ 5 21.2362 4.48 | Q | | | V |
18+10 21.2668 4.44 | Q | | | V |
18+15 21.2972 4.41 | Q | | | V |
18+20 21.3275 4.40 | Q | | | V |
18+25 21.3577 4.38 | Q | | | V |
18+30 21.3879 4.38 | Q | | | V |
18+35 21.4165 4.16 | Q | | | V |
18+40 21.4415 3.62 | Q | | | V |
18+45 21.4653 3.46 | Q | | | V |
18+50 21.4871 3.16 | Q | | | V |
18+55 21.5049 2.58 | Q | | | V |
19+ 0 21.5213 2.39 | Q | | | V |
19+ 5 21.5388 2.53 | Q | | | V |
19+10 21.5595 3.01 | Q | | | V |
19+15 21.5811 3.14 | Q | | | V |
19+20 21.6047 3.43 | Q | | | V |
19+25 21.6322 3.99 | Q | | | V |
19+30 21.6610 4.18 | Q | | | V |
19+35 21.6889 4.05 | Q | | | V |
19+40 21.7135 3.57 | Q | | | V |
19+45 21.7371 3.43 | Q | | | V |
19+50 21.7588 3.15 | Q | | | V |
19+55 21.7766 2.58 | Q | | | V |
20+ 0 21.7931 2.39 | Q | | | V |
20+ 5 21.8105 2.53 | Q | | | V |
20+10 21.8312 3.01 | Q | | | V |
20+15 21.8528 3.14 | Q | | | V |
20+20 21.8749 3.20 | Q | | | V |
20+25 21.8972 3.23 | Q | | | V |
20+30 21.9196 3.26 | Q | | | V |
20+35 21.9422 3.27 | Q | | | V |
20+40 21.9648 3.29 | Q | | | V |
20+45 21.9874 3.29 | Q | | | V |
20+50 22.0085 3.06 | Q | | | V |
20+55 22.0259 2.53 | Q | | | V |
21+ 0 22.0422 2.36 | Q | | | V |
21+ 5 22.0596 2.52 | Q | | | V |
21+10 22.0803 3.01 | Q | | | V |
21+15 22.1019 3.14 | Q | | | V |
21+20 22.1224 2.98 | Q | | | V|
21+25 22.1395 2.47 | Q | | | V|
21+30 22.1555 2.33 | Q | | | V|
21+35 22.1728 2.50 | Q | | | V|
21+40 22.1935 3.01 | Q | | | V|
21+45 22.2151 3.14 | Q | | | V|
21+50 22.2356 2.98 | Q | | | V|
21+55 22.2527 2.47 | Q | | | V|
22+ 0 22.2688 2.33 | Q | | | V|
22+ 5 22.2860 2.50 | Q | | | V|
22+10 22.3067 3.01 | Q | | | V|
22+15 22.3284 3.14 | Q | | | V|
22+20 22.3489 2.98 | Q | | | V|
22+25 22.3659 2.47 | Q | | | V|
22+30 22.3820 2.33 | Q | | | V|
22+35 22.3976 2.28 | Q | | | V|
22+40 22.4131 2.25 | Q | | | V|
22+45 22.4284 2.22 | Q | | | V|
22+50 22.4436 2.21 | Q | | | V|
22+55 22.4587 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+ 0 22.4738 2.19 | Q | | | V|
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2146 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley 3828PR10024100
23+ 5 22.4889 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+10 22.5040 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+15 22.5191 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+20 22.5342 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+25 22.5493 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+30 22.5644 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+35 22.5795 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+40 22.5946 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+45 22.6097 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+50 22.6248 2.19 | Q | | | V|
23+55 22.6399 2.19 | Q | | | V|
24+ 0 22.6549 2.19 | Q | | | V|
24+ 5 22.6669 1.74 |Q | | | V|
24+10 22.6716 0.67 Q | | | V|
24+15 22.6739 0.34 Q | | | V|
24+20 22.6753 0.20 Q | | | V|
24+25 22.6761 0.11 Q | | | V|
24+30 22.6765 0.06 Q | | | V|
24+35 22.6766 0.03 Q | | | V|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2147 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2148 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2149 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) F.1.l
Packet Pg. 2150 Attachment: Preliminary Hydrology Report (E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley Trade Center/Park) m e m o r a n d u m
DATE: April 22, 2022
TO: David Ornelas, T&B Planning
FROM: Sandipan Bhattacharjee, P.E., T.E., AICP, ENV-SP
SUBJECT: Moreno Valley Trade Center Trip Generation Comparison (ECommerce & Warehouse Scenarios) Translutions, Inc. (Translutions) is pleased to provide this memorandum discussing the trip generation included in the Moreno Valley Trade Center Traffic Impact Analyses (TIA) and the proposed trip generation that includes High-Cube Cold Storage warehouse facilities.
Background. In November 2020, Translutions submitted a TIA for the Moreno Valley Trade Center project in the City of Moreno Valley. The project included the construction of approximately 1,332,380 square feet of E-Commerce warehouse uses. Subsequently, the project site plan was changed to 1,263,270 square feet with change in project access, eliminating all traffic from Encilia Avenue. A revised analysis was conducted in April 2022, and the levels of service under the revised project were not worse than those in the previous analysis.
The project’s EIR also evaluates options where 50,000 square feet of each alternative would include High-Cube Cold Storage facilities.
Trip Generation from Original TIA. As stated earlier, the TIA for the original project was submitted to the City in November 2020. The trip generation used for the analysis was based on surveyed rated from similar E-Commerce facilities in the Inland Empire. Tables A and B show the project trip generation from the approved TIA. As shown in Table A, the original project is forecast to generate 554 PCE trips in the a.m. peak hour, 1,118 PCE trips in the p.m. peak hour, and 7,903 PCE daily trips for the e-commerce scenario. As shown in Table B, the original project is forecast to generate 363 PCE trips in the a.m. peak hour, 404 PCE trips in the p.m. peak hour, and 3,665 PCE daily trips for the warehouse scenario.
Trip Generation from Revised TIA. As stated earlier, the revised TIA was revised in April 2022. Tables C and D show the project trip generation from the revised TIA. As shown in Table C, the revised project is forecast to generate 524 PCE trips in the a.m. peak hour, 1,061 PCE trips in the p.m. peak hour, and 7,494 PCE daily trips for the e-commerce scenario. As shown in Table E, the revised project is forecast to generate 342 PCE trips in the a.m. peak hour, 383 PCE trips in the p.m. peak hour, and 3,474 PCE daily trips for the warehouse scenario. Therefore, under both scenarios, the revised project generates fewer trips.
Trip Generation for Cold Storage. The air quality analysis evaluates a scenario where up to 50,000 square feet of each scenario is developed for cold storage. The trip generation for the cold storage portion of the warehouse is based on trip generation rates for Land Use 157 “High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse” from Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Edition). Table E shows the trip generation for the proposed High-Cube Cold Storage portion. Table F summarizes the proposed project trip generation for the remaining portion for the E-Commerce scenario. Table G summarizes the proposed project trip generation for the E-Commerce scenario with cold storage. Table H summarizes the proposed project trip generation for the remaining portion for the warehouse scenario. Table I summarizes the proposed project trip generation for the warehouse scenario with cold storage. As shown in Table H, the revised project is forecast to generate 518 PCE trips in the a.m. peak hour, 1,033 PCE trips in the p.m. peak hour, and 7,377 PCE daily trips for the e-commerce with cold storage scenario. As shown in Table I, the revised project is forecast to generate 343 PCE trips in the a.m. peak hour, 382 PCE trips in the p.m. peak hour, and 3,518 PCE daily trips for the e-commerce with cold storage scenario. translutions
the transportation solutions company. ..
F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2151 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley Memorandum: Moreno Valley Trade Center
Trip Generation Comparison
P:\HILLWOOD - MORENO VALLEY TRADE CENTER\MAR 2022 SITE ACCESS ANALYSIS\CS TRIP GEN\TRIP GEN COMPARISON APRIL 2022.DOCX April 22, 2022
the transportation solutions company...
Trip Generation Comparison. Table J summarizes the trip generations for the various alternatives. As seen on Table J, the trip generation for the revised project under all scenarios are less than those for the previous project.
VMT Evaluation. The revised building footprint is approximately 69,000 square feet less than the previous building footprint, or approximately 5% less. This is a minor reduction, and the employee numbers are anticipated to remain the same as before or reduce slightly. Since VMT impacts are based on VMT per employee, if the number of employees remain the same or decrease slightly, the per employee home-based work VMT will remain the same or decrease slightly. Therefore, the VMT impacts are unlikely to change from the previous project.
Conclusion. Since the trip generation of the proposed project during the a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and daily are lower than those disclosed in the TIA submitted in November 2020, the impacts from the proposed project are anticipated to be less than those disclosed in the November 2020 TIA and addressed in the prior CEQA analyses.
F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2152 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley the transportation solutions company...
Land Use Units In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates1 1,332.38 TSF 0.2910 0.0717 0.3673 0.4087 0.3883 0.7970 4.9591 Trip Generation 388 96 489 545 517 1062 6,607
Trip Generation Rates1 1,332.38 TSF 0.2800 0.0592 0.3392 0.3998 0.3733 0.7731 4.3155 Trip Generation 373 79 452 533 497 1030 5,750
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
373 79 452 533 497 1030 5,750
Trip Generation Rates1 0.0009 0.0009 0.0019 0.0002 0.0010 0.0011 0.1329 Trip Generation 1 1 3 0 1 2 177
1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
2 2 5 0 2 3 266
Trip Generation Rates1 0.0027 0.0030 0.0057 0.0013 0.0025 0.0038 0.1149 Trip Generation 4 4 8 2 3 5 153
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
8 8 16 4 6 10 306
Trip Generation Rates1 0.0074 0.0085 0.0205 0.0074 0.0116 0.0190 0.3957 Trip Generation 10 11 27 10 15 25 527
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
30 33 81 30 45 75 1,581
Warehouse 1,332.38 TSF
373 79 452 533 497 1,030 5,750
1 1 3 0 1 2 177
4 4 8 2 3 5 153
10 11 27 10 15 25 527
All Trucks 15 16 38 12 19 32 857
403 95 490 545 516 1,062 6,607
373 79 452 533 497 1,030 5,750
2 2 5 0 2 3 266
8 8 16 4 6 10 306
30 33 81 30 45 75 1,581
40 43 102 34 53 88 2,153
413 122 554 567 550 1,118 7,903
1 Trips based on Surveys and application to Proposed Project. 2 Recommended PCE Factor per SBCTA Guidelines
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Total Truck PCE
Total PCE
4+ Axle Trucks
Total Vehicles
Total Project Trip Generation (Passenger Car Eqivalent Trips, By Vehicle Type) Passenger Cars
Truck PCE
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
PCE Factor2
PCEs
3-Axle Trucks
PCE Factor2
PCEs
4-Axle Trucks
PCE Factor2
PCEs
Total Project Trip Generation (Trips, By Vehicle Type)
Passenger Cars
2-Axle Trucks
2-Axle Trucks
Table A - Project Trip Generation (e-Commerce, November 2020) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Total Vehicle Rates
Total Vehicle Rates
Passenger Car Equivalent Rates Calculations
Passenger Cars
PCE Factor2
PCEs
P:\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\CS Trip Gen\E_Comm Trip Gen Comparison.xlsx\E_Comm Trip Gen (WA) OLD (4/22/2022) 4/22/2022 F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2153 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley the transportation solutions company...
Land Use Units In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates1 TSF 0.131 0.039 0.170 0.051 0.139 0.190 1.740 77% 23% 100% 27% 73% 100% 50%/50%
61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90%
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.477 0.024 0.105 0.032 0.086 0.118 1.077
6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45%
1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
0.013 0.004 0.016 0.005 0.013 0.018 0.168
8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65%
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
0.023 0.007 0.029 0.009 0.024 0.033 0.301
22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99%
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
0.090 0.027 0.117 0.035 0.096 0.131 1.200
Warehouse Net PCE Rate 0.602 0.062 0.268 0.081 0.219 0.300 2.747 Warehouse 1,332.38 TSF
109 32 141 43 114 157 1,436
12 3 15 5 12 17 150
15 5 20 6 16 22 201
41 12 53 17 42 59 534
All Trucks 68 20 88 28 70 98 885
245 52 229 71 184 255 2,321
109 32 141 43 114 157 1,436
18 5 23 8 18 26 225
30 10 40 12 32 44 402
123 36 159 51 126 177 1,602
171 51 222 71 176 247 2,229
280 83 363 114 290 404 3,665
1 Rates based on Land Use 150 "Warehousing" from Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Ed.). 2 Recommended Truck Mix Percentages per SCAQMD Truck Trip Generation Study. 3 Recommended PCE Factor per SBCTA Guidelines
Total Vehicle Rates
Table B - Project Trip Generation (Warehouse, November 2020) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Inbound/Outbound Splits
Passenger Car Equivalent Rates Calculations
Passenger Cars
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
2-Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
3-Axle Trucks
Total Vehicles
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
4-Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
Total Project Trip Generation (Trips, By Vehicle Type)
Passenger Cars
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Total Truck PCE
Total PCE
Total Project Trip Generation (Passenger Car Eqivalent Trips, By Vehicle Type) Passenger Cars
Truck PCE
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
P:\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\CS Trip Gen\Warehouse Trip Gen Comparison2.xlsx\WH Trip Gen old (4/22/2022) 4/22/2022 F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2154 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley the transportation solutions company...
Land Use Units In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates1 1,263.27 TSF 0.2910 0.0717 0.3673 0.4087 0.3883 0.7970 4.9591 Trip Generation 368 91 464 516 491 1007 6,265
Trip Generation Rates1 1,263.27 TSF 0.2800 0.0592 0.3392 0.3998 0.3733 0.7731 4.3155 Trip Generation 354 75 429 505 472 977 5,452
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
354 75 429 505 472 977 5,452
Trip Generation Rates1 0.0009 0.0009 0.0019 0.0002 0.0010 0.0011 0.1329 Trip Generation 1 1 2 0 1 1 168
1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
2 2 3 0 2 2 252
Trip Generation Rates1 0.0027 0.0030 0.0057 0.0013 0.0025 0.0038 0.1149 Trip Generation 3 4 7 2 3 5 145
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
6 8 14 4 6 10 290
Trip Generation Rates1 0.0074 0.0085 0.0205 0.0074 0.0116 0.0190 0.3957 Trip Generation 9 11 26 9 15 24 500
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
27 33 78 27 45 72 1,500
Warehouse 1,263.27 TSF
354 75 429 505 472 977 5,452
1 1 2 0 1 1 168
3 4 7 2 3 5 145
9 11 26 9 15 24 500
All Trucks 13 16 35 11 19 30 813
380 91 464 516 491 1,007 6,265
354 75 429 505 472 977 5,452
2 2 3 0 2 2 252
6 8 14 4 6 10 290
27 33 78 27 45 72 1,500
35 43 95 31 53 84 2,042
389 118 524 536 525 1,061 7,494
1 Trips based on Surveys and application to Proposed Project. 2 Recommended PCE Factor per SBCTA Guidelines
Total Vehicle Rates
PCE Factor2
PCEs
Table C - Project Trip Generation (e-Commerce, April 2022 TIA) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Passenger Car Equivalent Rates Calculations
Passenger Cars
Total Vehicle Rates
PCE Factor2
PCEs
PCE Factor2
PCEs
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
Total Vehicles
PCE Factor2
4-Axle Trucks
PCEs
Total Project Trip Generation (Trips, By Vehicle Type)
Passenger Cars
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Total Truck PCE
Total PCE
Total Project Trip Generation (Passenger Car Eqivalent Trips, By Vehicle Type) Passenger Cars
Truck PCE
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
P:\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\CS Trip Gen\E_Comm Trip Gen Comparison.xlsx\E_Comm Trip Gen (WA) (4/22/2022) 4/22/2022 F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2155 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley the transportation solutions company...
Land Use Units In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates1 TSF 0.131 0.039 0.170 0.051 0.139 0.190 1.740 77% 23% 100% 27% 73% 100% 50%/50%
61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90%
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.477 0.024 0.105 0.032 0.086 0.118 1.077
6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45%
1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
0.013 0.004 0.016 0.005 0.013 0.018 0.168
8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65%
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
0.023 0.007 0.029 0.009 0.024 0.033 0.301
22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99%
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
0.090 0.027 0.117 0.035 0.096 0.131 1.200
Warehouse Net PCE Rate 0.602 0.062 0.268 0.081 0.219 0.300 2.747 Warehouse 1,263.27 TSF
102 31 133 41 108 149 1,361
11 3 14 5 11 16 142
15 4 19 6 15 21 191
39 11 50 16 40 56 506
All Trucks 65 18 83 27 66 93 839
232 49 216 68 174 242 2,200
102 31 133 41 108 149 1,361
16 5 21 7 17 24 213
30 8 38 12 30 42 382
117 33 150 48 120 168 1,518
163 46 209 67 167 234 2,113
265 77 342 108 275 383 3,474
1 Rates based on Land Use 150 "Warehousing" from Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Ed.). 2 Recommended Truck Mix Percentages per SCAQMD Truck Trip Generation Study. 3 Recommended PCE Factor per SBCTA Guidelines
Total Truck PCE
Total PCE
Total Project Trip Generation (Passenger Car Eqivalent Trips, By Vehicle Type) Passenger Cars
Truck PCE
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Total Vehicles
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
4-Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
Total Project Trip Generation (Trips, By Vehicle Type)
Passenger Cars
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Inbound/Outbound Splits
Passenger Car Equivalent Rates Calculations
Passenger Cars
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
2-Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
3-Axle Trucks
Total Vehicle Rates
Table D - Project Trip Generation (Warehouse, April 2022 TIA) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
P:\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\CS Trip Gen\Warehouse Trip Gen Comparison2.xlsx\WH Trip Gen (4/22/2022) 4/22/2022 F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2156 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley the transportation solutions company...
Land Use Units In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates1 TSF 0.085 0.025 0.110 0.034 0.086 0.120 2.120 77% 23% 100% 28% 72% 100% 50%/50%
55.82% 55.82% 55.82% 55.82% 55.82% 55.82% 55.82%
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.047 0.014 0.061 0.019 0.048 0.067 1.183
7.48% 7.48% 7.48% 7.48% 7.48% 7.48% 7.48%
1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
0.010 0.003 0.012 0.004 0.010 0.013 0.238
10.03% 10.03% 10.03% 10.03% 10.03% 10.03% 10.03%
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
0.017 0.005 0.022 0.007 0.017 0.024 0.425
26.66% 26.66% 26.66% 26.66% 26.66% 26.66% 26.66%
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
0.068 0.020 0.088 0.027 0.069 0.096 1.696
Warehouse Net PCE Rate 0.142 0.042 0.184 0.056 0.144 0.200 3.542 Warehouse 50.00 TSF
3 1 4 2 2 4 60
101101 8
1 0 1 1 0 1 11
2 0 2 1 1 2 29
All Trucks 4 0 4 3 1 4 48
7 1 8 5 3 8 108
3 1 4 2 2 4 60
2 0 2 2 0 2 12
2 0 2 2 0 2 22
6 0 6 3 3 6 87
10 0 10 7 3 10 121
13 1 14 9 5 14 181
1 Rates based on Land Use 157 "High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse" from Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Ed.). 2 Recommended Truck Mix Percentages per SCAQMD Truck Trip Generation Study for Cold Storage. 3 Recommended PCE Factor per SBCTA Guidelines
Total Truck PCE
Total PCE
Total Project Trip Generation (Passenger Car Eqivalent Trips, By Vehicle Type) Passenger Cars
Truck PCE
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Total Vehicles
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
4-Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
Total Project Trip Generation (Trips, By Vehicle Type)
Passenger Cars
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Inbound/Outbound Splits
Passenger Car Equivalent Rates Calculations
Passenger Cars
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
2-Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
3-Axle Trucks
Total Vehicle Rates
Table E: Project Trip Generation (High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
P:\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\CS Trip Gen\Alt 1 E_Comm Trip Gen CS.xlsx\CS WH Trip Gen (4/22/2022) 4/22/2022 F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2157 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley the transportation solutions company...
Land Use Units In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates1 1,213.27 TSF 0.2910 0.0717 0.3673 0.4087 0.3883 0.7970 4.9591 Trip Generation 353 87 446 496 471 967 6,017
Trip Generation Rates1 1,213.27 TSF 0.2800 0.0592 0.3392 0.3998 0.3733 0.7731 4.3155 Trip Generation 340 72 412 485 453 938 5,236
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
340 72 412 485 453 938 5,236
Trip Generation Rates1 0.0009 0.0009 0.0019 0.0002 0.0010 0.0011 0.1329 Trip Generation 1 1 2 0 1 1 161
1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
2 2 3 0 2 2 242
Trip Generation Rates1 0.0027 0.0030 0.0057 0.0013 0.0025 0.0038 0.1149 Trip Generation 3 4 7 2 3 5 139
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
6 8 14 4 6 10 278
Trip Generation Rates1 0.0074 0.0085 0.0205 0.0074 0.0116 0.0190 0.3957 Trip Generation 9 10 25 9 14 23 480
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
27 30 75 27 42 69 1,440
Warehouse 1,213.27 TSF
340 72 412 485 453 938 5,236
1 1 2 0 1 1 161
3 4 7 2 3 5 139
9 10 25 9 14 23 480
All Trucks 13 15 34 11 18 29 780
353 87 446 496 471 967 6,016
340 72 412 485 453 938 5,236
2 2 3 0 2 2 242
6 8 14 4 6 10 278
27 30 75 27 42 69 1,440
35 40 92 31 50 81 1,960
375 112 504 516 503 1,019 7,196
1 Trips based on Surveys and application to Proposed Project. 2 Recommended PCE Factor per SBCTA Guidelines
Total Truck PCE
Total PCE
Total Project Trip Generation (Passenger Car Eqivalent Trips, By Vehicle Type) Passenger Cars
Truck PCE
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Total Vehicles
PCE Factor2
4-Axle Trucks
PCEs
Total Project Trip Generation (Trips, By Vehicle Type)
Passenger Cars
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
PCE Factor2
PCEs
PCE Factor2
PCEs
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
Total Vehicle Rates
PCE Factor2
PCEs
Table F - Project Trip Generation (E-Commerce Warehouse Portion, Cold Storage Scenario) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Passenger Car Equivalent Rates Calculations
Passenger Cars
Total Vehicle Rates
P:\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\CS Trip Gen\Alt 1 E_Comm Trip Gen CS.xlsx\E_Comm Trip Gen (WA) (4/22/2022) 4/22/2022 F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2158 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley the transportation solutions company...
Land Use Units In Out Total In Out Total
TOTAL VEHICLES
343 73 416 487 455 942 5,296
2 1 3 1 1 2 169
4 4 8 3 3 6 150
11 10 27 10 15 25 509
17 15 38 14 19 33 828
TOTAL PCE
343 73 416 487 455 940 5,296
4 2 5 2 2 4 254
8 8 16 6 6 12 300
33 30 81 30 45 75 1,527
45 40 102 38 53 91 2,081
388 113 518 525 508 1,033 7,377
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Total Truck PCE
Total PCE
Passenger Cars
Truck PCE
2-Axle Trucks
Table G - Total Project Trip Generation Summary (e-Commerce + Cold Storage) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Total Trucks
Passenger Cars
Trucks
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
P:\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\CS Trip Gen\Alt 1 E_Comm Trip Gen CS.xlsx\Trip Gen Summary (4/22/2022) 4/22/2022 F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2159 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley the transportation solutions company...
Land Use Units In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation Rates1 TSF 0.131 0.039 0.170 0.051 0.139 0.190 1.740 77% 23% 100% 27% 73% 100% 50%/50%
61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90% 61.90%
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
0.081 0.024 0.105 0.032 0.086 0.118 1.077
6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45% 6.45%
1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
0.013 0.004 0.016 0.005 0.013 0.018 0.168
8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65% 8.65%
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
0.023 0.007 0.029 0.009 0.024 0.033 0.301
22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99% 22.99%
3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
0.090 0.027 0.117 0.035 0.096 0.131 1.200
Warehouse Net PCE Rate 0.207 0.062 0.268 0.081 0.219 0.300 2.747 Warehouse 1,213.27 TSF
99 29 128 39 104 143 1,307
11 3 14 4 11 15 137
14 4 18 5 15 20 183
37 11 48 15 39 54 486
All Trucks 62 18 80 24 65 89 806
161 47 208 63 169 232 2,113
99 29 128 39 104 143 1,307
16 5 21 6 17 23 206
28 8 36 10 30 40 366
111 33 144 45 117 162 1,458
155 46 201 61 164 225 2,030
254 75 329 100 268 368 3,337
1 Rates based on Land Use 150 "Warehousing" from Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (10th Ed.). 2 Recommended Truck Mix Percentages per SCAQMD Truck Trip Generation Study. 3 Recommended PCE Factor per SBCTA Guidelines
Total Truck PCE
Total PCE
Total Project Trip Generation (Passenger Car Eqivalent Trips, By Vehicle Type) Passenger Cars
Truck PCE
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Total Vehicles
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
4-Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
Total Project Trip Generation (Trips, By Vehicle Type)
Passenger Cars
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Inbound/Outbound Splits
Passenger Car Equivalent Rates Calculations
Passenger Cars
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
2-Axle Trucks
Recommended Mix (%)2
PCE Factor3
PCE Rates
3-Axle Trucks
Total Vehicle Rates
Table H: Project Trip Generation (Warehouse Portion, Cold Storage Scenario) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
P:\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\CS Trip Gen\Alt 2 Warehouse Trip Gen CS.xlsx\WH Trip Gen (4/22/2022) 4/22/2022 F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2160 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley the transportation solutions company...
Land Use Units In Out Total In Out Total
TOTAL VEHICLES
102 30 132 41 106 147 1,367
12 3 15 5 11 16 145
15 4 19 6 15 21 194
39 11 50 16 40 56 515
66 18 84 27 66 93 854
TOTAL PCE
102 30 132 41 106 147 1,367
18 5 23 8 17 25 218
30 8 38 12 30 42 388
117 33 150 48 120 168 1,545
165 46 211 68 167 235 2,151
267 76 343 109 273 382 3,518
Total Trucks
Passenger Cars
Trucks
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
Table I: Total Project Trip Generation Summary (Warehouse + Cold Storage) Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Total Truck PCE
Total PCE
Passenger Cars
Truck PCE
2-Axle Trucks
3-Axle Trucks
4+ Axle Trucks
P:\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\CS Trip Gen\Alt 2 Warehouse Trip Gen CS.xlsx\WH Trip Gen Summary (4/22/2022) 4/22/2022 F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2161 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley F.1.m
Packet Pg. 2162 Attachment: Trip Generation Comparison Memorandum for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation (5846 : Moreno Valley | translutions, inc. | 17632 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 200, Tustin, California 92780 | P (949) 656-3131 | [email protected] | m e m o r a n d u m
DATE: April 9, 2022
TO: John Grace, Vice President - Development, Hillwood
FROM: Sandipan Bhattacharjee, Translutions, Inc.
SUBJECT: Moreno Valley Trade Center – Warehouse Scenario - Traffic Impact Analysis Evaluation
Translutions, Inc. (Translutions) is pleased to provide this memorandum discussing the changes to the traffic impact analysis associated with the updated site plan for the Moreno Valley Trade Center Warehouse development project. The project is located on the southwest corner of Redlands Boulevard and Eucalyptus Avenue in the City of Moreno Valley.
BACKGROUND
Translutions submitted a TIA in November 2020 to the City of Moreno Valley that included the analysis of a proposed 1,332,380 square foot warehouse development. Since then, the project description has been revised to include a 1,263,270 square foot warehouse building and several modifications to the site plan. This memorandum compares the findings from the traffic impact analysis in November 2020 to what is being proposed now. Figure 1 illustrates the revised site plan.
REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
As stated above, the project description has been modified to now include a reduction in square footage for the warehouse building from 1,332,380 square feet to 1,263,270 square feet. Access to the site has been modified for both autos and trucks.
For autos, access to the site from Encilia Avenue has been removed. Autos will access the site via the two driveways on Eucalyptus Avenue and the two driveways on Redlands Boulevard. The northern driveway on Redlands Boulevard now includes full-access inbound/outbound movements for autos and will include a traffic signal as a project design feature. The analysis includes the signal as a project constructed improvement. Trucks will access the site via the two driveways on Eucalyptus Avenue and are prohibited on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue.
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
The project trip generation disclosed in the previous TIA from 2020 was compared to the trip generation for the proposed project. Table A summarizes the trip generation comparison. As shown in Table A, the proposed project would result in a net decrease in project trips of -21 a.m. peak hour PCE trips, -21 p.m. peak hour PCE trips, and -191 daily PCE trips, when compared to the previous study’s trip generation.
Table A - Project Trip Generation Comparison
Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Units In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation from Previous Traffic Impact Analysis (November 2020) Passenger Cars 109 32 141 43 114 157 1,436
Total PCE 280 83 363 114 290 404 3,665
Trip Generation (Proposed Project )
Passenger Cars 102 31 133 41 108 149 1,361
Total PCE 265 77 342 108 275 383 3,474
Net Change in Total PCE -15 -6 -21 -6 -15 -21 -191
translutions
the transportation solutions company. ..
F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2163 Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation [Revision 1] Memorandum: Moreno Valley Trade Center – Warehouse Scenario Traffic Impact Analysis Evaluation
P:\HILLWOOD - MORENO VALLEY TRADE CENTER\MAR 2022 SITE ACCESS ANALYSIS\MVTC WAREHOUSE MEMO.DOCX 2 April 9, 2022
the transportation solutions company...
REDUCTION IN AUTO TRIPS ON ENCILIA AVENUE
The trip distribution for the proposed project trips were developed using the same trip distribution patterns for autos from the November 2020 TIA and adjusted to reflect the changes in access for autos included in the project description such as the removal of the project driveways on Encilia Avenue. With the removal of the project driveways on Encilia Avenue, a reduction in project trips is anticipated on Encilia Avenue. Table B compares the project trips on Encilia Avenue from the previous TIA to the proposed project. As shown in Table B, the proposed project would result in a net decrease in project trips on Encilia Avenue of -63 a.m. peak hour trips, -70 p.m. peak hour trips, and -639 daily trips.
Table B - Project Trip Comparison on Encilia Avenue
Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Units In Out Total In Out Total
Project Trips on Encilia Avenue from Previous Traffic Impact Analysis (November 2020) Total Trips 48 15 63 19 51 70 639
Project Trips on Encilia Avenue (Proposed Project)
Total Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net Change in Trips on Encilia Avenue -48 -15 -63 -19 -51 -70 -639
REDUCTION IN TRUCK TRIPS ON REDLANDS BOULEVARD SOUTH OF EUCALYPTUS AVENUE The trip distribution for the proposed project trips were developed using the same trip distribution patterns for trucks from the November 2020 TIA and adjusted to reflect the changes in access for trucks included in the project description such as the prohibition of trucks on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue. With trucks prohibited on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue, a reduction in trucks trips is shown in Table C. Table C compares the trucks trips on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue from the previous TIA to the proposed project. As shown in Table C, the proposed project would result in a net decrease in truck PCE trips on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue of -5 a.m. peak hour PCE trips, -21 p.m. peak hour PCE trips, and -334 daily PCE trips.
Table C - Truck Trip Comparison on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Units In Out Total In Out Total
Truck Trips on Redlands Blvd. south of Eucalyptus Ave. from Previous Traffic Impact Analysis (November 2020) Total Trips 5 0 5 21 0 21 334
Truck Trips on Redlands Blvd. south of Eucalyptus Ave. (Proposed Project) Total Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net Change in Trips on Encilia
Avenue -5 0 -5 -21 0 -21 -334
LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARISON
As stated previously, the trip distribution for the proposed project trips were developed using the same trip distribution patterns for autos and trucks from the November 2020 TIA. With the trip generation reduction shown in Table A of -21 a.m. peak hour PCE trips, -21 p.m. peak hour PCE trips, and -191 daily PCE trips, it was anticipated that the levels of service at the study area intersections would generally improve or remain the same under existing, opening year, and general plan build out conditions at the study area intersections and roadways segments. A full analysis has been conducted and available for F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2164 Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation [Revision 1] Memorandum: Moreno Valley Trade Center – Warehouse Scenario Traffic Impact Analysis Evaluation
P:\HILLWOOD - MORENO VALLEY TRADE CENTER\MAR 2022 SITE ACCESS ANALYSIS\MVTC WAREHOUSE MEMO.DOCX 3 April 9, 2022
the transportation solutions company...
review, and as anticipated, the operations under the revised project are better than the previous project. Summary LOS tables are attached.
CONCLUSION
Based on the changes to the project description, the proposed project would result in a net decrease in project trips of -21 a.m. peak hour PCE trips, -21 p.m. peak hour PCE trips, and -191 daily PCE trips, when compared to the previous study’s trip generation. A full analysis was conducted, and the results are summarized in this memorandum. The project will not result in any new operational deficiencies that were not disclosed in the previous TIA from November 2020.
Attachments:
Figure 1 – Site Plan
LOS Tables
F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2165 Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation [Revision 1] Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Westbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 16.5 B 15.2 B 16.7 B 15.6 B - - - 2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 89.1 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - - 3 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 30.2 C 32.5 C 32.3 C 37.6 D 2.1 5.1 NO
4. Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.1 B 10.9 B 11.0 B 12.5 B 0.9 1.6 NO 5 . Driveway 1/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 9.2 A A 11.2 B 10.4 B 2.0 10.4 NO 6 . Driveway 2/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 8.6 A 8.9 A 8.6 8.9 - 7 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Westbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 27.5 C 39.9 D 27.7 C 40.9 D - - - 8 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 20.4 C 25.0 C 25.4 C 25.2 C - - -9 . Redlands Boulevard/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 8.9 A 6.5 A 9.8 A 14.1 B 0.9 7.6 NO 10 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 14.3 A 17.6 B 14.3 17.6 NO11 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 4 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 9.5 A 10.3 B 9.5 10.3 NO12 . Redlands Boulevard/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 20.5 C 18.2 C 21.6 A 18.6 A 1.1 0.4 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table A: Existing Intersection Levels of Service(Revised Project Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised Alt 2\Exist LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2166
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume Volume Requirement? 1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 14,403 F * 1.152 2U 12,500 15,275 F * 1.222 - - 2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,290 E * 0.983 2U 12,500 13,925 F * 1.114 0.131 YES 3 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 3 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 13,121 A 0.525 -0.478 NO 4 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 3 to Driveway 4 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 12,903 A 0.516 -0.487 NO5 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 4 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 12,903 A 0.516 -0.487 NO6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 12,724 F * 1.018 2U 12,500 13,364 F * 1.069 - - 7 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 23,934 B 0.638 4D 37,500 25,174 B 0.671 0.033 NO 8 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 3,673 A 0.294 2U 12,500 5,023 A 0.402 0.108 NO 9 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 1,617 A 0.065 4U 25,000 3,021 A 0.121 0.056 NO 10 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 1,507 A 0.080 4U 25,000 3,193 A 0.128 0.047 NO11 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 2 City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,424 A 0.129 4U 25,000 4,110 A 0.164 0.035 NO12 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 2 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,424 A 0.129 4U 25,000 4,250 A 0.170 0.041 NO13 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 217 A 0.108 4U 25,000 217 A 0.009 -0.100 NO14 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 217 A 0.108 4U 25,000 217 A 0.009 -0.100 NO15 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 475 A 0.237 4U 25,000 475 A 0.019 -0.218 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Roadway
Capacity Classification LOS Standard LOS LOS
Table B: Existing Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) Without Project With Project
Classification Roadway Capacity
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\Exist LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2167
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Westbound D Caltrans Signal 16.9 B 16.1 B 17.3 B 16.1 B - - - 2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound R D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -3 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 30.4 C 37.1 D 34.9 D 45.5 D 4.5 8.4 NO4. Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.5 B 11.7 B 11.5 B 13.6 B 1.0 1.9 NO 5 . Driveway 1/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 9.5 A A 11.6 B 10.7 B 2.1 10.7 NO 6 . Driveway 2/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 8.7 A 8.9 A -- - 7 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Westbou D Caltrans Signal 37.4 D 64.5 E * 39.8 D 65.2 E * - - -8 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Eastboun D Caltrans Signal 40.9 D 32.1 C 42.6 D 38.1 D 1.7 6.0 - 9 . Redlands Boulevard/Eucalyptus Aven D Moreno Valley Roundabout 16.0 C 8.4 A 18.7 C 10.1 B 2.7 1.7 NO 10 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 17.3 B 27.8 D 17.3 27.8 NO11 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 4 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 9.8 B 11.4 B 9.8 11.4 NO 12 . Redlands Boulevard/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 30.5 D 26.9 D 35.5 A 30.2 D 5.0 3.3 NO -- -
Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table C: Opening Year (2024) Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised Alt 2\OY LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2168
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume Volume Requirement? 1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,155 F * 1.452 2U 12,500 19,027 F * 1.522 - - 2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 16,324 F * 1.306 2U 12,500 17,959 F * 1.437 0.131 YES3 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 3 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 15,630 B 0.625 -0.578 NO 4 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 3 to Driveway 4 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 15,412 B 0.616 -0.587 NO 5 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 4 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 15,412 B 0.616 -0.587 NO 6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,159 F * 1.453 2U 12,500 18,799 F * 1.504 - - 7 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 32,941 D 0.878 4D 37,500 34,181 E * 0.911 0.033 NO 8 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 6,371 A 0.510 2U 12,500 7,721 B 0.618 0.108 NO 9 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 2,943 A 0.118 4U 25,000 4,347 A 0.174 0.056 NO 10 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,822 A 0.150 4U 25,000 4,508 A 0.180 0.030 NO11 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 2 City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 3,834 A 0.204 4U 25,000 5,520 A 0.221 0.016 NO12 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 2 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 3,834 A 0.204 4U 25,000 5,660 A 0.226 0.022 NO13 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 240 A 0.120 4U 25,000 240 A 0.010 -0.110 NO 14 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 240 A 0.120 4U 25,000 240 A 0.010 -0.110 NO 15 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 524 A 0.262 4U 25,000 524 A 0.021 -0.241 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table D: Opening Year (2024) Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis)
LOS LOS
Classification Roadway Capacity LOS Standard Classification Roadway Capacity Without Project With Project D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\OY LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2169
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Westbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 2.8 A 0.2 A 19.4 B 13.4 B - - -2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 15.1 B 27.6 C 16.3 B 33.4 C - - -3 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 32.4 C 49.0 D 34.1 C 53.5 D 1.7 4.5 NO 4 . Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 12.7 B 19.3 C 13.9 B 21.4 C 1.2 2.1 NO5 . Driveway 1/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 11.5 B A 14.3 B 14.7 B 2.8 14.7 NO6 . Driveway 2/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 9.0 A 10.1 B 9.0 10.1 - 7 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Westbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 9.6 A 7.5 A 11.5 B 7.7 A - - - 8 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 14.7 B 20.7 C 16.3 B 16.9 B - - -9 . Redlands Boulevard/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Roundabout 8.6 A 16.1 C 12.6 B 19.7 C 4.0 3.6 NO 10 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 27.3 D 86.2 F * 27.3 86.2 YES 11 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 4 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 11.3 B 13.2 B 11.3 13.2 NO12 . Redlands Boulevard/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 14.7 B 27.6 C 14.6 B 27.8 C -0.1 0.2 NO -- -
Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table E: General Plan Build-Out (2040) Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised Alt 2\2040 LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2170
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS Requirement? 1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 4D 37,500 25,690 B 0.685 26,562 C 0.708 0.023 NO2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 26,068 B 0.695 27,703 C 0.739 0.044 NO 3 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 3 City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 25,861 B 0.690 0.016 NO 4 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 3 to Driveway 4 City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 25,643 B 0.684 0.010 NO 5 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 4 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 25,643 B 0.684 0.010 NO6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 6D 56,300 24,982 A 0.444 25,622 A 0.455 0.011 NO7 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 44,511 C 0.791 45,751 D 0.813 0.022 NO 8 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 12,586 A 0.503 13,936 A 0.557 0.054 NO9 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 8,251 A 0.330 9,655 A 0.386 0.056 NO 10 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 7,912 A 0.316 9,598 A 0.384 0.067 NO11 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 2 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,978 A 0.399 11,664 A 0.467 0.067 NO 12 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 2 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,978 A 0.399 11,804 A 0.472 0.073 NO 13 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 3,996 A 0.160 3,996 A 0.160 0.000 NO14 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 3,996 A 0.160 3,996 A 0.160 0.000 NO15 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 4,312 A 0.172 4,312 A 0.172 0.000 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table F: General Plan Build-Out (2040) Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) LOS
Standard Classification Roadway Capacity
Without Project With Project
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\2040 LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2171
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * Signal 37.9 D 44.7 D Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table G: Existing With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
With Project With Improvements
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised Alt 2\Exist LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2172
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 15,275 F * 4D 37,500 15,275 A 2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 13,925 F * 4D 37,500 13,925 A6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 13,364 F * 4D 37,500 13,364 A Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table H: Existing with Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) LOS
Standard
With Project With Project With Improvements
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\Exist LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2173
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound R D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * Signal 35.7 D 42.2 D 7 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Westboun D Caltrans Signal 39.8 D 65.2 E * Signal 43.6 D 56.8 E * Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Table I: Opening Year (2024) With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
With Project With Improvements
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised Alt 2\OY LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2174
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 19,027 F * 4D 37,500 19,027 A 2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 17,959 F * 4D 37,500 17,959 A6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,799 F * 4D 37,500 18,799 A Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table J: Opening Year (2024) With Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) LOS
Standard
With Project With Project With Improvements
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\OY LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2175
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 10 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC 27.3 D 86.2 F * Signal 2.8 A 3.5 A Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table K: General Plan Build-out (2040) With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
With Project With Project With Improvements
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised Alt 2\2040 LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2176
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Westbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 16.5 B 15.2 B 13.5 B 19.1 B - - - 2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 89.1 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - - 3 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 30.2 C 32.5 C 32.4 C 37.8 D 2.2 5.3 NO
4. Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.1 B 10.9 B 11.1 B 12.6 B 1.0 1.7 NO 5 . Driveway 1/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 9.2 A A 10.4 B 10.4 B 1.2 10.4 NO 6 . Driveway 2-Essen Ln/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 8.7 A 8.8 A 0.3 0.5 NO 7 . Driveway 3/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 8.9 A 9.0 A 0.5 0.7 NO8 . Driveway 4-Shubert Street/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 9.1 A 9.2 A 0.7 0.9 NO9 . Driveway 5/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 8.6 A 8.9 A 8.6 8.9 NO 10 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Westbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 27.5 C 39.9 D 27.6 C 40.8 D - - - 11 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 20.4 C 25.0 C 25.6 C 25.2 C - - -12 . Redlands Boulevard/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 8.9 A 6.5 A 10.1 B 14.3 B 1.2 7.8 NO 13 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 6 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 9.8 A 10.3 B 9.8 10.3 NO 14 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 7 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 9.7 A 10.4 B 9.7 10.4 NO15 . Redlands Boulevard/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 20.5 C 18.2 C 2.5 A 0.5 A -18.0 -17.7 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table A: Existing Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised Alt 2\Exist LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2177
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume Volume Requirement? 1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 14,403 F * 1.152 2U 12,500 15,322 F * 1.226 - - 2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,290 E * 0.983 2U 12,500 14,015 F * 1.121 0.138 YES 3 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 6 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 13,515 A 0.541 -0.462 NO 4 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 6 to Driveway 7 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 13,501 A 0.540 -0.463 NO5 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 7 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 13,174 A 0.527 -0.476 NO6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 12,724 F * 1.018 2U 12,500 13,401 F * 1.072 - - 7 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 23,934 B 0.638 4D 37,500 25,243 B 0.673 0.035 NO 8 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 3,673 A 0.294 2U 12,500 5,097 A 0.408 0.114 NO 9 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 1,617 A 0.065 4U 25,000 3,099 A 0.124 0.059 NO 10 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 1,507 A 0.080 4U 25,000 2,930 A 0.117 0.037 NO11 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 5 City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,424 A 0.129 4U 25,000 3,847 A 0.154 0.025 NO12 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 5 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,424 A 0.129 4U 25,000 3,958 A 0.158 0.029 NO13 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 217 A 0.108 4U 25,000 361 A 0.014 -0.094 NO14 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 217 A 0.108 4U 25,000 569 A 0.023 -0.086 NO15 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 475 A 0.237 4U 25,000 1,114 A 0.045 -0.193 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Roadway
Capacity Classification LOS Standard LOS LOS
Table B: Existing Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) Without Project With Project
Classification Roadway Capacity
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\Exist LOS 29 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2178
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Westbound D Caltrans Signal 16.9 B 16.1 B 12.6 B 13.9 B - - - 2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound R D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -3 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 30.4 C 37.1 D 35.1 D 46.3 D 4.7 9.2 NO4. Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.5 B 11.7 B 11.5 B 13.8 B 1.0 2.1 NO 5 . Driveway 1/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 9.5 A A 10.7 B 10.6 B 1.2 10.6 NO 6 . Driveway 2-Essen Ln/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 8.7 A 8.8 A 0.3 0.5 NO 7 . Driveway 3/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.5 A 8.3 A 8.9 A 9.0 A 0.4 0.7 NO8 . Driveway 4-Shubert Street/Encilia Av D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 9.2 A 9.2 A 0.8 0.9 NO9 . Driveway 5/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 8.7 A 8.9 A -- - 10 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Westbou D Caltrans Signal 37.4 D 64.5 E * 40.1 D 65.1 E * - - -11 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Eastboun D Caltrans Signal 40.9 D 32.1 C 43.7 D 38.5 D 2.8 6.4 NO 12 . Redlands Boulevard/Eucalyptus Aven D Moreno Valley Roundabout 16.0 C 8.4 A 19.7 C 10.4 B 3.7 2.0 NO 13 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 6 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 10.1 B 11.5 B 10.1 11.5 NO 14 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 7 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 10.1 B 11.6 B 10.1 11.6 NO15 . Redlands Boulevard/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 30.5 D 26.9 D 2.4 A 1.2 A -28.1 -25.7 NO -- -
Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table C: Opening Year (2024) Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised Alt 2\OY LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2179
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume Volume Requirement? 1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,155 F * 1.452 2U 12,500 19,074 F * 1.526 - - 2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 16,324 F * 1.306 2U 12,500 18,049 F * 1.444 0.138 YES3 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 6 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 16,024 B 0.641 -0.563 NO 4 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 6 to Driveway 7 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 16,010 B 0.640 -0.563 NO 5 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 7 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 15,683 B 0.627 -0.576 NO 6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,159 F * 1.453 2U 12,500 18,836 F * 1.507 - - 7 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 32,941 D 0.878 4D 37,500 34,250 E * 0.913 0.035 NO 8 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 6,371 A 0.510 2U 12,500 7,795 B 0.624 0.114 NO 9 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 2,943 A 0.118 4U 25,000 4,425 A 0.177 0.059 NO 10 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,822 A 0.150 4U 25,000 4,245 A 0.170 0.019 NO11 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 5 City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 3,834 A 0.204 4U 25,000 5,257 A 0.210 0.006 NO12 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 5 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 3,834 A 0.204 4U 25,000 5,368 A 0.215 0.010 NO13 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 240 A 0.120 4U 25,000 384 A 0.015 -0.104 NO 14 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 240 A 0.120 4U 25,000 592 A 0.024 -0.096 NO 15 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 524 A 0.262 4U 25,000 1,163 A 0.047 -0.215 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table D: Opening Year (2024) Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis)
LOS LOS
Classification Roadway Capacity LOS Standard Classification Roadway Capacity Without Project With Project D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\OY LOS 36 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2180
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Westbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 2.8 A 0.2 A 2.8 A 0.1 A - - - 2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 15.1 B 27.6 C 16.4 B 33.4 C - - -3 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 32.4 C 49.0 D 34.2 C 53.9 D 1.8 4.9 NO 4 . Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 12.7 B 19.3 C 14.0 B 21.5 C 1.3 2.2 NO5 . Driveway 1/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 11.5 B A 13.1 B 14.8 C 1.6 14.8 NO6 . Driveway 2-Essen Ln/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.7 A 9.2 A 9.5 A 10.8 B 0.8 1.6 NO 7 . Driveway 3/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.7 A 9.2 A 9.1 A 11.0 B 0.4 1.8 NO8 . Driveway 4-Shubert Street/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.6 A 9.2 A 9.2 A 10.3 B 0.6 1.1 NO 9 . Driveway 5/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 9.0 A 10.1 B 9.0 10.1 - 10 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Westbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 9.6 A 7.5 A 11.6 B 7.6 A - - - 11 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal 14.7 B 20.7 C 16.3 B 16.9 B - - NO 12 . Redlands Boulevard/Eucalyptus Avenue D Moreno Valley Roundabout 8.6 A 16.1 C 9.7 B 20.3 C 1.1 4.2 NO 13 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 6 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 11.6 B 13.3 B 11.6 13.3 NO14 . Redlands Boulevard/Driveway 7 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 11.6 B 13.4 B 11.6 13.4 NO15 . Redlands Boulevard/Encilia Avenue D Moreno Valley Signal 14.1 B 28.0 C 15.5 B 27.3 C 1.4 -0.7 NO -- -
Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table E: General Plan Build-Out (2040) Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised Alt 2\2040 LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2181
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS Requirement? 1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 4D 37,500 25,690 B 0.685 26,609 C 0.710 0.025 NO 2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 26,068 B 0.695 27,793 C 0.741 0.046 NO 3 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 6 City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 26,255 B 0.700 0.026 NO 4 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 6 to Driveway 7 City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 26,241 B 0.700 0.026 NO 5 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 7 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 25,914 B 0.691 0.017 NO 6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 6D 56,300 24,982 A 0.444 25,659 A 0.456 0.012 NO7 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 44,511 C 0.791 45,820 D 0.814 0.023 NO8 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 12,586 A 0.503 14,010 A 0.560 0.057 NO9 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 8,251 A 0.330 9,733 A 0.389 0.059 NO 10 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 7,912 A 0.316 9,335 A 0.373 0.057 NO 11 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 5 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,978 A 0.399 11,401 A 0.456 0.057 NO 12 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 5 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,978 A 0.399 11,512 A 0.460 0.061 NO 13 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 3,996 A 0.160 4,140 A 0.166 0.006 NO14 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 3,996 A 0.160 4,348 A 0.174 0.014 NO 15 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 4,312 A 0.172 4,951 A 0.198 0.026 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential LOS
Standard Classification Roadway Capacity
Without Project With Project
Table F: General Plan Build-Out (2040) Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\2040 LOS 45 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2182
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound Ramps D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * Signal 31.8 C 42.3 D Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table G: Existing With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
With Project With Improvements
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised Alt 2\Exist LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2183
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 15,322 F * 4D 37,500 15,322 A 2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 14,015 F * 4D 37,500 14,015 A6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 13,401 F * 4D 37,500 13,401 A Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential LOS
Standard
With Project With Project With Improvements
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity Table H: Existing with Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\Exist LOS MIT 50 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2184
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 2 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 Eastbound R D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * Signal 32.9 C 43.2 D 10 . Redlands Boulevard/SR-60 Westboun D Caltrans Signal 40.1 D 65.1 E * Signal 35.1 D 56.7 E * Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Table I: Opening Year (2024) With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
With Project With Improvements
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised Alt 2\OY LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2185
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 19,074 F * 4D 37,500 19,074 A 2 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 18,049 F * 4D 37,500 18,049 A6 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,836 F * 4D 37,500 18,836 A Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential LOS
Standard
With Project With Project With Improvements
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity Table J: Opening Year (2024) With Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS Alt 2\OY LOS MIT 53 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2186
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - | translutions, inc. | 17632 Irvine Boulevard, Suite 200, Tustin, California 92780 | P (949) 656-3131 | [email protected] | m e m o r a n d u m
DATE: April 9, 2022
TO: John Grace, Vice President - Development, Hillwood
FROM: Sandipan Bhattacharjee, Translutions, Inc.
SUBJECT: Moreno Valley Trade Center – E-Commerce Scenario - Traffic Impact Analysis Evaluation
Translutions, Inc. (Translutions) is pleased to provide this memorandum discussing the changes to the traffic impact analysis associated with the updated site plan for the Moreno Valley Trade Center E-Commerce development project. The project is located on the southwest corner of Redlands Boulevard and Eucalyptus Avenue in the City of Moreno Valley.
BACKGROUND
Translutions submitted a TIA in November 2020 to the City of Moreno Valley that included the analysis of a proposed 1,332,380 square foot E-Commerce warehouse development. Since then, the project description has been revised to include a 1,263,270 square foot E-Commerce building and several modifications to the site plan. This memorandum compares the findings from the traffic impact analysis in November 2020 to what is being proposed now. Figure 1 illustrates the revised site plan.
REVISED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
As stated above, the project description has been modified to now include a reduction in square footage for the E-Commerce building from 1,332,380 square feet to 1,263,270 square feet. Access to the site has been modified for both autos and trucks.
For autos, access to the site from Encilia Avenue has been removed. Autos will access the site via the two driveways on Eucalyptus Avenue and the two driveways on Redlands Boulevard. The northern driveway on Redlands Boulevard now includes full-access inbound/outbound movements for autos and will include a traffic signal as a project design feature. The analysis includes the signal as a project constructed improvement. Trucks will access the site via the two driveways on Eucalyptus Avenue and are prohibited on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue.
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON
The project trip generation disclosed in the previous TIA from 2020 was compared to the trip generation for the proposed project. Table A summarizes the trip generation comparison. As shown in Table A, the proposed project would result in a net decrease in project trips of -30 a.m. peak hour PCE trips, -57 p.m. peak hour PCE trips, and -409 daily PCE trips, when compared to the previous study’s trip generation.
Table A - Project Trip Generation Comparison
Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Units In Out Total In Out Total
Trip Generation from Previous Traffic Impact Analysis (November 2020) Passenger Cars 373 79 452 533 497 1,030 5,750
Total PCE 413 122 554 567 550 1,118 7,903
Trip Generation (Proposed Project)
Passenger Cars 354 75 429 505 472 977 5,452
Total PCE 389 118 524 536 525 1,061 7,494
Net Change in Total PCE -24 -4 -30 -31 -25 -57 -409
translutions
the transportation solutions company. ..
F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2187 Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation [Revision 1] Memorandum: Moreno Valley Trade Center – E-Commerce Scenario Traffic Impact Analysis Evaluation
P:\HILLWOOD - MORENO VALLEY TRADE CENTER\MAR 2022 SITE ACCESS ANALYSIS\MVTC E_COMMERCE MEMO.DOCX 2 April 9, 2022
the transportation solutions company...
REDUCTION IN AUTO TRIPS ON ENCILIA AVENUE
The trip distribution for the proposed project trips were developed using the same trip distribution patterns for autos from the November 2020 TIA and adjusted to reflect the changes in access for autos included in the project description such as the removal of the project driveways on Encilia Avenue. With the removal of the project driveways on Encilia Avenue, a reduction in project trips is anticipated on Encilia Avenue. Table B compares the project trips on Encilia Avenue from the previous TIA to the proposed project. As shown in Table B, the proposed project would result in a net decrease in project trips on Encilia Avenue of -200 a.m. peak hour trips, -459 p.m. peak hour trips, and -2,559 daily PCE trips.
Table B - Project Trip Comparison on Encilia Avenue
Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Units In Out Total In Out Total
Project Trips on Encilia Avenue from Previous Traffic Impact Analysis (November 2020) Total Trips 165 35 200 235 224 459 2,559
Project Trips on Encilia Avenue (Proposed Project)
Total Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net Change in Trips on Encilia Avenue -165 -35 -200 -235 -224 -459 -2559
REDUCTION IN TRUCK TRIPS ON ENCILIA AVENUE
The trip distribution for the proposed project trips were developed using the same trip distribution patterns for trucks from the November 2020 TIA and adjusted to reflect the changes in access for trucks included in the project description such as the prohibition of trucks on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue. With trucks prohibited on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue, a reduction in trucks trips is shown in Table C. Table C compares the trucks trips on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue from the previous TIA to the proposed project. As shown in Table C, the proposed project would result in a net decrease in truck PCE trips on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue of -12 a.m. peak hour PCE trips, -10 p.m. peak hour PCE trips, and -323 daily PCE trips.
Table C - Truck Trip Comparison on Redlands Boulevard south of Eucalyptus Avenue Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily
Units In Out Total In Out Total
Truck Trips on Redlands Blvd. south of Eucalyptus Ave. from Previous Traffic Impact Analysis (November 2020) Total Trips 12 0 12 10 0 10 323
Truck Trips on Redlands Blvd. south of Eucalyptus Ave. (Proposed Project) Total Trips 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Net Change in Trips on Encilia
Avenue -12 0 -12 -10 0 -10 -323
LEVEL OF SERVICE COMPARISON
As stated previously, the trip distribution for the proposed project trips were developed using the same trip distribution patterns for autos and trucks from the November 2020 TIA. With the trip generation reduction shown in Table A of -30 a.m. peak hour PCE trips, -57 p.m. peak hour PCE trips, and -409 daily PCE trips, it was anticipated that the levels of service at the study area intersections would generally improve or remain the same under existing, opening year, and general plan build out conditions at the study area intersections and roadways segments. A full analysis has been conducted and available for F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2188 Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation [Revision 1] Memorandum: Moreno Valley Trade Center – E-Commerce Scenario Traffic Impact Analysis Evaluation
P:\HILLWOOD - MORENO VALLEY TRADE CENTER\MAR 2022 SITE ACCESS ANALYSIS\MVTC E_COMMERCE MEMO.DOCX 3 April 9, 2022
the transportation solutions company...
review, and as anticipated, the operations under the revised project are better than the previous project. Summary LOS tables are attached.
CONCLUSION
Based on the changes to the project description, the proposed project would result in a net decrease in project trips of -30 a.m. peak hour PCE trips, -57 p.m. peak hour PCE trips, and -409 daily PCE trips, when compared to the previous study’s trip generation. A full analysis was conducted, and the results are summarized in this memorandum. The project will not result in any new operational deficiencies that were not disclosed in the previous TIA from November 2020.
Attachments:
Figure 1 – Site Plan
LOS Tables
F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2189 Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Project Evaluation [Revision 1] Source: HPA Architecture (March 21, 2022) FIGURE 1
Moreno Valley Trade Center
Site Plan
the transportation solutions company...
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\Z30 Site Plan (4/6/2022) F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2190
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Kitching St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 34.4 C 32.8 C 34.6 C 33.4 C 0.2 0.6 NO2 . Lasselle St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 42.7 D 43.9 D 46.1 D 44.7 D 3.4 0.8 NO3 . Lasselle St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 40.8 D 41.9 D 40.9 D 42.1 D 0.1 0.2 NO4 . Nason St/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 43.4 D 27.3 C 43.6 D 28.1 C 0.2 0.8 NO5 . Nason St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 39.1 D 29.4 C 39.4 D 30.2 C 0.3 0.8 NO 6 . Nason St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 24.2 C 22.6 C 24.2 C 22.6 C 0.0 0.0 NO 7 . Fir Ave/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 23.5 C 21.3 C 23.7 C 21.5 C 0.2 0.2 NO8 . Oliver St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 28.5 C 23.5 C 29.3 C 23.8 C 0.8 0.3 NO 9 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 16.5 B 15.2 B 17.1 B 15.2 B - - - 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 89.1 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - - 11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 30.2 C 32.5 C 33.3 C 39.6 D 3.1 7.1 NO12 . Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.1 B 10.9 B 11.5 B 16.0 C 1.4 5.1 NO 13 . Moreno Beach Dr/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 39.3 D 30.6 C 39.3 D 37.5 D 0.0 6.9 NO14 . Moreno Beach Blvd/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 26.2 C 29.7 C 26.6 C 29.9 C 0.4 0.2 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr/John F Kennedy Dr D Moreno Valley Signal 29.4 C 28.1 C 29.6 C 28.7 C 0.2 0.6 NO16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC 59.6 F * 16.2 C 64.7 F * 18.5 C - - - 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC 74.3 F * 60.7 F * 80.1 F * 79.0 F * - - -18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC 86.2 F * >100 F * 95.1 F * >100 F * - - - 19 . Dwy 1/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 9.2 A A 10.8 B 12.5 B 1.6 12.5 NO 20 . Dwy 2/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 8.8 A 9.2 A 8.8 9.2 NO 21 . Redlands Blvd/Ironwood Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 19.8 B 13.8 B 20.1 C 13.7 B 0.3 -0.1 NO22 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 27.5 C 39.9 D 27.6 C 46.9 D - - -23 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 20.4 C 25.0 C 28.5 C 26.8 C - - - 24 . Redlands Blvd/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 8.9 A 6.5 A 12.2 B 18.6 B 3.3 12.1 NO 25 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 20.7 B >100 F * 20.7 393.4 YES26 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 4 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 9.7 B 11.4 B 9.7 11.4 NO 27 . Redlands Blvd/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 20.5 C 18.2 C 24.6 C 25.4 D 4.1 7.2 NO 28 . Redlands Blvd/Cottonwood Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 7.0 A 5.5 A 7.1 A 5.7 A 0.1 0.2 NO 29 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley AWSC 26.7 D * 26.7 D * 40.3 E * 67.5 F * 13.6 40.8 YES 30 . Redlands Blvd-John F Kennedy Dr/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley AWSC 11.1 B 11.3 B 11.4 B 11.7 B 0.3 0.4 NO 31 . WLC Parkway/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.0 B 9.6 A 10.4 B 10.1 B 0.4 0.5 NO Notes:
* Exceeds LOS Standard
TWSC = Two-Way Stop Control; For TWSC intersections, reported delay is for worst-case approach/movement.LOS = Level of Service Table A: Existing Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised\Exist LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2191
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume Volume Requirement? 1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 13,775 D * 0.856 2MA 16,100 14,157 D * 0.879 - - 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 17,208 F * 1.069 2MA 16,100 17,644 F * 1.096 - - 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 17,452 F * 1.084 2MA 16,100 17,888 F * 1.111 - - 4 . Redlands Blvd north of Ironwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 18,086 F * 1.447 2U 12,500 18,522 F * 1.482 0.035 NO 5 . Redlands Blvd from Ironwood Ave to SR-60 WB Ramps City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,092 F * 1.207 2U 12,500 15,528 F * 1.242 0.035 NO 6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 14,403 F * 1.152 2U 12,500 15,970 F * 1.278 - - 7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,290 E * 0.983 2U 12,500 14,988 F * 1.199 0.216 YES 8 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 3 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 14,881 A 0.595 -0.408 NO 9 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 3 to Driveway 4 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 14,007 A 0.560 -0.443 NO 10 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 4 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 14,007 A 0.560 -0.443 NO11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 10,585 D * 0.847 2U 12,500 12,057 E * 0.965 0.118 YES 12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 9,391 C 0.751 2U 12,500 10,699 D * 0.856 0.105 YES13 . Redlands Blvd from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 8,501 B 0.680 2U 12,500 8,829 C 0.706 0.026 NO 14 . JFK Dr from Cactus Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley C 4U 25,000 5,797 A 0.232 4U 25,000 6,015 A 0.241 0.009 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 12,724 F * 1.018 2U 12,500 14,005 F * 1.120 - - 16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 23,934 B 0.638 4D 37,500 26,332 C 0.702 0.064 NO17 . Moreno Beach Dr from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 18,862 F * 1.509 2U 12,500 19,244 F * 1.539 0.031 NO 18 . Moreno Beach Dr from Cactus Ave to JFK Dr City of Moreno Valley C 6D 56,300 15,452 A 0.274 6D 56,300 15,834 A 0.281 0.007 NO 19 . Moreno Beach Dr from JFK Dr to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 15,898 A 0.282 6D 56,300 16,498 A 0.293 0.011 NO20 . Iris Ave From Nason St to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 19,248 A 0.342 6D 56,300 19,738 A 0.351 0.009 NO21 . Iris Ave From Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 30,134 A 0.535 6D 56,300 30,624 A 0.544 0.009 NO22 . Iris Ave From Kitching St to Lasselle St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 26,472 A 0.470 6D 56,300 26,744 A 0.475 0.005 NO 23 . Eucalyptus Ave from Nason St to Fir Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,376 A 0.375 4U 25,000 9,648 A 0.386 0.011 NO 24 . Eucalyptus Ave from Fir Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 14,002 A 0.373 4D 37,500 14,274 A 0.381 0.007 NO25 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 3,673 A 0.294 2U 12,500 6,507 A 0.521 0.227 NO 26 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 1,617 A 0.065 4U 25,000 4,669 A 0.187 0.122 NO 27 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 1,507 A 0.080 4U 25,000 4,731 A 0.189 0.109 NO28 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 2 City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,424 A 0.129 4U 25,000 5,648 A 0.226 0.097 NO29 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 2 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,424 A 0.129 4U 25,000 5,886 A 0.235 0.106 NO30 . Eucalyptus Ave from Redlands Blvd to World Logistics Center Driveway City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 2,612 A 0.209 2U 12,500 2,886 A 0.231 0.022 NO31 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 217 A 0.108 4U 25,000 217 A 0.009 -0.100 NO32 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 217 A 0.108 4U 25,000 217 A 0.009 -0.100 NO33 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 475 A 0.237 4U 25,000 475 A 0.019 -0.218 NO 34 . Alessandro Blvd from Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 10,745 D 0.860 2U 12,500 11,017 D 0.881 0.022 NO35 . Alessandro Blvd from Nason St to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 9,553 C 0.764 2U 12,500 10,043 D 0.803 0.039 NO36 . Alessandro Blvd from Moreno Beach Dr to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 5,549 A 0.444 2U 12,500 6,421 A 0.514 0.070 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Roadway
Capacity Classification LOS Standard LOS LOS
Table B: Existing Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) Without Project With Project
Classification Roadway Capacity
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS\Exist LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2192
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Kitching St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 39.7 D * 37.3 D * 40.0 D * 38.2 D * 0.3 0.9 NO 2 . Lasselle St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 92.7 F * 60.8 E * 93.3 F * 63.5 E * 0.6 2.7 NO 3 . Lasselle St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 48.6 D 55.0 E * 50.2 D 55.7 E * 1.6 0.7 NO 4 . Nason St/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 67.2 E * 37.7 D 68.1 E * 38.8 D 0.9 1.1 NO 5 . Nason St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 42.2 D 36.9 D 42.2 D 37.8 D 0.0 0.9 NO 6 . Nason St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 30.8 C 29.8 C 31.0 C 32.6 C 0.2 2.8 NO 7 . Fir Ave/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 25.5 C 25.8 C 26.6 C 26.0 C 1.1 0.2 NO 8 . Oliver St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 35.6 D 27.8 C 36.0 D 28.0 C 0.4 0.2 NO 9 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 16.9 B 16.1 B 17.3 B 16.2 B - - - 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 30.4 C 37.1 D 36.8 D 57.7 E * 6.4 20.6 YES12 . Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.5 B 11.7 B 12.0 B 18.2 C 1.5 6.5 NO 13 . Moreno Beach Dr/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 70.3 E * 85.2 F * 71.9 E * 98.4 F * 1.6 13.2 YES 14 . Moreno Beach Blvd/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 30.4 C 33.2 C 30.6 C 33.6 C 0.2 0.4 NO 15 . Moreno Beach Dr/John F Kennedy Dr D Moreno Valley Signal 30.0 C 28.3 C 30.3 C 28.9 C 0.3 0.6 NO 16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC >100 F * 24.6 C >100 F * 30.7 D * - - - 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -19 . Dwy 1/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 9.5 A A 11.1 B 13.9 B 1.6 13.9 NO 20 . Dwy 2/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 8.9 A 9.3 A 8.9 9.3 NO 21 . Redlands Blvd/Ironwood Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 21.0 C 19.5 B 21.0 C 26.3 C 0.0 6.8 NO 22 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 37.4 D 64.5 E * 41.1 D 71.3 E * - - -23 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 40.9 D 32.1 C 36.8 D 48.7 D - - - 24 . Redlands Blvd/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Roundabout 16.0 C 8.4 A 22.0 C 14.7 C 6.0 6.3 NO 25 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 27.1 B >100 F * 27.1 956.4 YES 26 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 4 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 10.0 B 13.0 B 10.0 13.0 NO 27 . Redlands Blvd/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 30.5 D 26.9 D 22.7 C 27.8 D -7.8 0.9 NO 28 . Redlands Blvd/Cottonwood Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 7.9 A 6.9 A 7.9 A 7.4 A 0.0 0.5 NO 29 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley AWSC 95.1 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * 28.6 86.6 YES 30 . Redlands Blvd-John F Kennedy Dr/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley AWSC 21.8 C 31.2 D * 22.7 C 35.1 E * 0.9 3.9 NO 31 . WLC Parkway/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * 677.7 10626.4 YES Notes:
* Exceeds LOS Standard
TWSC = Two-Way Stop Control; For TWSC intersections, reported delay is for worst-case approach/movement.LOS = Level of Service Table C: Opening Year (2024) Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised\OY LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2193
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume Volume Requirement? 1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 15,849 E * 0.984 2MA 16,100 16,231 F * 1.008 - -2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 19,852 F * 1.233 2MA 16,100 20,288 F * 1.260 - -3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 20,216 F * 1.256 2MA 16,100 20,652 F * 1.283 - - 4 . Redlands Blvd north of Ironwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 21,242 F * 1.699 2U 12,500 21,678 F * 1.734 0.035 NO5 . Redlands Blvd from Ironwood Ave to SR-60 WB Ramps City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 17,625 F * 1.410 2U 12,500 18,061 F * 1.445 0.035 NO6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,155 F * 1.452 2U 12,500 19,722 F * 1.578 - -7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 16,324 F * 1.306 2U 12,500 19,022 F * 1.522 0.216 YES 8 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 3 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 17,390 B 0.696 -0.508 NO 9 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 3 to Driveway 4 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 16,516 B 0.661 -0.543 NO 10 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 4 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 16,516 B 0.661 -0.543 NO 11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 12,891 F * 1.031 2U 12,500 14,363 F * 1.149 0.118 YES12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 11,794 E * 0.944 2U 12,500 13,102 F * 1.048 0.105 YES13 . Redlands Blvd from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 10,196 D * 0.816 2U 12,500 10,524 D * 0.842 0.026 NO 14 . JFK Dr from Cactus Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley C 4U 25,000 7,080 A 0.283 4U 25,000 7,298 A 0.292 0.009 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,159 F * 1.453 2U 12,500 19,440 F * 1.555 - - 16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 32,941 D 0.878 4D 37,500 35,339 E * 0.942 0.064 YES 17 . Moreno Beach Dr from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 25,697 F * 2.056 2U 12,500 26,079 F * 2.086 0.031 NO18 . Moreno Beach Dr from Cactus Ave to JFK Dr City of Moreno Valley C 6D 56,300 22,022 A 0.391 6D 56,300 22,404 A 0.398 0.007 NO 19 . Moreno Beach Dr from JFK Dr to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 26,091 A 0.463 6D 56,300 26,691 A 0.474 0.011 NO20 . Iris Ave From Nason St to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 29,723 A 0.528 6D 56,300 30,213 A 0.537 0.009 NO21 . Iris Ave From Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 42,358 C 0.752 6D 56,300 42,848 C 0.761 0.009 NO22 . Iris Ave From Kitching St to Lasselle St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 36,225 B 0.643 6D 56,300 36,497 B 0.648 0.005 NO23 . Eucalyptus Ave from Nason St to Fir Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 11,434 A 0.457 4U 25,000 11,706 A 0.468 0.011 NO 24 . Eucalyptus Ave from Fir Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 17,687 A 0.472 4D 37,500 17,959 A 0.479 0.007 NO25 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 6,371 A 0.510 2U 12,500 9,205 C 0.736 0.227 NO 26 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 2,943 A 0.118 4U 25,000 5,995 A 0.240 0.122 NO 27 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,822 A 0.150 4U 25,000 6,046 A 0.242 0.091 NO 28 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 2 City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 3,834 A 0.204 4U 25,000 7,058 A 0.282 0.078 NO29 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 2 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 3,834 A 0.204 4U 25,000 7,296 A 0.292 0.087 NO30 . Eucalyptus Ave from Redlands Blvd to World Logistics Center Driveway City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 6,042 A 0.483 2U 12,500 6,316 A 0.505 0.022 NO 31 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 240 A 0.120 4U 25,000 240 A 0.010 -0.110 NO32 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 240 A 0.120 4U 25,000 240 A 0.010 -0.110 NO33 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 524 A 0.262 4U 25,000 524 A 0.021 -0.241 NO 34 . Alessandro Blvd from Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 18,164 F * 1.453 2U 12,500 18,436 F * 1.475 0.022 NO 35 . Alessandro Blvd from Nason St to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 17,498 F * 1.400 2U 12,500 17,988 F * 1.439 0.039 NO 36 . Alessandro Blvd from Moreno Beach Dr to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 7,674 B 0.614 2U 12,500 8,546 B 0.684 0.070 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table D: Opening Year (2024) Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis)
LOS LOS
Classification Roadway Capacity LOS Standard Classification Roadway Capacity Without Project With Project
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS\OY LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2194
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Kitching St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 95.4 F * >100 F * 98.8 F * >100 F * 3.4 0.1 NO 2 . Lasselle St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 39.6 D 39.5 D 39.7 D 39.6 D 0.1 0.1 NO 3 . Lasselle St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 49.4 D 63.5 E * 49.7 D 64.5 E * 0.3 1.0 NO 4 . Nason St/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 58.4 E * 57.5 E * 58.4 E * 58.8 E * 0.0 1.3 NO 5 . Nason St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 44.8 D 40.6 D 44.8 D 40.7 D 0.0 0.1 NO6 . Nason St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 35.4 D * 63.5 E * 35.6 D * 63.9 E * 0.2 0.4 NO 7 . Fir Ave/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 32.6 C 34.1 C 32.8 C 34.4 C 0.2 0.3 NO 8 . Oliver St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 34.0 C 32.2 C 34.2 C 32.4 C 0.2 0.2 NO9 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 2.8 A 0.2 A 19.4 B 13.3 B - - - 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 15.1 B 27.6 C 16.2 B 35.6 D - - - 11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 32.4 C 49.0 D 34.7 C 59.9 E * 2.3 10.9 YES 12 . Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 12.7 B 19.3 C 14.5 B 28.2 D 1.8 8.9 NO 13 . Moreno Beach Dr/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 36.8 D 37.9 D 36.8 D 38.3 D 0.0 0.4 NO 14 . Moreno Beach Blvd/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 29.6 C 28.5 C 29.7 C 28.8 C 0.1 0.3 NO 15 . Moreno Beach Dr/John F Kennedy Dr D Moreno Valley Signal 35.7 D 30.0 C 35.8 D 30.4 C 0.1 0.4 NO 16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - - 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -19 . Dwy 1/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 11.5 B A 13.6 B 20.1 C 2.1 20.1 NO 20 . Dwy 2/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 9.2 A 10.5 B 9.2 10.5 NO 21 . Redlands Blvd/Ironwood Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 25.9 C 32.2 C 26.0 C 24.7 C 0.1 -7.5 NO 22 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 9.6 A 7.5 A 11.6 B 8.0 A -- - 23 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 14.7 B 20.7 C 15.5 B 14.7 B - - -24 . Redlands Blvd/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Roundabout 8.6 A 16.1 C 10.1 B 40.2 E * 1.5 24.1 YES 25 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 51.5 F * >100 F * 51.5 2596.5 YES 26 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 4 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 11.5 B 15.4 C 11.5 15.4 NO 27 . Redlands Blvd/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 14.7 B 27.6 C 14.6 B 25.5 C -0.1 -2.1 NO28 . Redlands Blvd/Cottonwood Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 4.3 A 8.4 A 7.7 A 14.3 B 3.4 5.9 NO 29 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley Signal 28.9 C 28.0 C 29.0 C 28.8 C 0.1 0.8 NO 30 . Redlands Blvd-John F Kennedy Dr/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 28.7 C 24.9 C 28.7 C 24.9 C 0.0 0.0 NO 31 . WLC Parkway/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 26.0 C 49.2 D 26.6 C 51.3 D 0.6 2.1 NO Notes:
* Exceeds LOS Standard
TWSC = Two-Way Stop Control; For TWSC intersections, reported delay is for worst-case approach/movement.LOS = Level of Service Table E: General Plan Build-Out (2040) Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised\2040 LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2195
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS Requirement? 1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 21,100 F * 1.311 21,482 F * --- 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 24,137 F * 1.499 24,573 F * --- 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 25,853 F * 1.606 26,289 F * --- 4 . Redlands Blvd north of Ironwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 4D 37,500 23,883 B 0.637 24,319 B 0.648 0.012 NO5 . Redlands Blvd from Ironwood Ave to SR-60 WB Ramps City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 22,667 B 0.604 23,103 B 0.616 0.012 NO 6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 4D 37,500 25,690 B 0.685 27,257 C - - - 7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 26,068 B 0.695 28,766 C 0.767 0.072 NO 8 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 3 City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 27,621 C 0.737 0.063 NO9 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 3 to Driveway 4 City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 26,747 C 0.713 0.039 NO 10 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 4 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 26,747 C 0.713 0.039 NO11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 4D 37,500 16,675 A 0.445 18,147 A 0.484 0.039 NO12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 4D 37,500 15,667 A 0.418 16,975 A 0.453 0.035 NO13 . Redlands Blvd from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley C 4D 37,500 10,706 A 0.285 11,034 A 0.294 0.009 NO14 . JFK Dr from Cactus Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley C 4U 25,000 12,915 A 0.517 13,133 A 0.525 0.009 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 6D 56,300 24,982 A 0.444 26,263 A - - -16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 44,511 C 0.791 46,909 D 0.833 0.043 NO 17 . Moreno Beach Dr from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 32,569 A 0.578 32,951 A 0.585 0.007 NO 18 . Moreno Beach Dr from Cactus Ave to JFK Dr City of Moreno Valley C 6D 56,300 25,486 A 0.453 25,868 A 0.459 0.007 NO19 . Moreno Beach Dr from JFK Dr to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 33,716 A 0.599 34,316 B 0.610 0.011 NO20 . Iris Ave From Nason St to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 45,638 D 0.811 46,128 D 0.819 0.009 NO 21 . Iris Ave From Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 61,514 F * 1.093 62,004 F * 1.101 0.009 NO 22 . Iris Ave From Kitching St to Lasselle St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 50,410 D 0.895 50,682 E * 0.900 0.005 NO 23 . Eucalyptus Ave from Nason St to Fir Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 26,165 F * 1.047 26,437 F * 1.057 0.011 NO 24 . Eucalyptus Ave from Fir Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 28,783 C 0.768 29,055 C 0.775 0.007 NO25 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 12,586 A 0.503 15,420 B 0.617 0.113 NO26 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 8,251 A 0.330 11,303 A 0.452 0.122 NO 27 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 7,912 A 0.316 11,136 A 0.445 0.129 NO28 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 2 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,978 A 0.399 13,202 A 0.528 0.129 NO 29 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 2 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,978 A 0.399 13,440 A 0.538 0.138 NO30 . Eucalyptus Ave from Redlands Blvd to World Logistics Center Driveway City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 19,426 C 0.777 19,700 C 0.788 0.011 NO31 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 3,996 A 0.160 3,996 A 0.160 0.000 NO32 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 3,996 A 0.160 3,996 A 0.160 0.000 NO 33 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 4,312 A 0.172 4,312 A 0.172 0.000 NO 34 . Alessandro Blvd from Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 36,212 B 0.643 36,484 B 0.648 0.005 NO 35 . Alessandro Blvd from Nason St to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 26,984 C 0.720 27,474 C 0.733 0.013 NO 36 . Alessandro Blvd from Moreno Beach Dr to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 27,143 C 0.724 28,015 C 0.747 0.023 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential LOS
Standard Classification Roadway Capacity
Without Project With Project
Table F: General Plan Build-Out (2040) Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS\2040 LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2196
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - With Project With Improvements
LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * Signal 32.0 C 35.6 D16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC 64.7 F * 18.5 C Signal 12.3 B 10.4 B 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC 80.1 F * 79.0 F * Signal 17.1 B 12.0 B18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC 95.1 F * >100 F * Signal 19.0 B 20.7 C25 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC 20.7 B >100 F * Signal 7.7 A 15.7 B 29 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley AWSC 40.3 E * 67.5 F * Signal 15.4 B 17.3 B Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table G: Existing With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised\Exist LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2197
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 14,157 D * 4MA 37,200 14,157 C 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 17,644 F * 4MA 37,200 17,644 C 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 17,888 F * 4MA 37,200 17,888 C 6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 15,970 F * 4D 37,500 15,970 A7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 14,988 F * 4D 37,500 14,988 A 11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 12,057 E * 4D 37,500 12,057 A12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 10,699 D * 4D 37,500 10,699 A15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 14,005 F * 4D 37,500 14,005 A16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 26,332 C 4D 37,500 26,332 C Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential LOS
Standard
With Project With Project With Improvements
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity Table H: Existing with Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS\Exist LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2198
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - With Project With Improvements
LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * Signal 37.4 D 41.3 D11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 36.8 D 57.7 E * Signal 34.2 C 39.8 D13 . Moreno Beach Dr/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 71.9 E * 98.4 F * Signal 49.1 D 68.0 E *16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC >100 F * 30.7 D * Signal 20.0 B 10.8 B 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 26.7 C 14.4 B18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 16.7 B 21.0 C22 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 41.1 D 71.3 E * Signal 36.3 D 59.1 E *25 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC 27.1 B >100 F * TWSC 10.5 B 17.3 B29 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 21.6 C 64.7 E *31 . WLC Parkway/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 43.4 D 27.3 C Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Table I: Opening Year (2024) With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised\OY LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2199
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 16,231 F * 4MA 37,200 16,231 C 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 20,288 F * 4MA 37,200 20,288 C 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 20,652 F * 4MA 37,200 20,652 C 6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 19,722 F * 4D 37,500 19,722 A7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 19,022 F * 4D 37,500 19,022 A 11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 14,363 F * 4D 37,500 14,363 A12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 13,102 F * 4D 37,500 13,102 A15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 19,440 F * 4D 37,500 19,440 A16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 35,339 E * 6D 56,300 35,339 B Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential LOS
Standard
With Project With Project With Improvements
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity Table J: Opening Year (2024) With Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS\OY LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2200
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - With Project With Improvements
LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 34.7 C 59.9 E * Signal 33.3 D 45.0 D16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 22.2 C 13.0 B17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 27.1 C 26.7 C18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 21.0 C 32.4 C24 . Redlands Blvd/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Roundabout 10.1 B 40.2 E * Roundabout 10.0 B 27.4 D25 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 3 D Moreno Valley TWSC 51.5 F * >100 F * Signal 5.6 A 14.3 B Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table K: General Plan Build-Out (2040) With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
With Project
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\LOS Revised\2040 LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2201
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 21,482 F * 4MA 37,200 21,482 C 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 24,573 F * 4MA 37,200 24,573 C 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 26,289 F * 4MA 37,200 26,289 C Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential With Project With Improvements LOS
Standard
With Project
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity Table L: General Plan Build-Out (2040) With Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Revised Project Analysis) D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Mar 2022 Site Access Analysis\xRoadway LOS\2040 LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2202
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Kitching St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 34.4 C 32.8 C 34.6 C 33.4 C 0.2 0.6 NO2 . Lasselle St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 42.7 D 43.9 D 46.1 D 44.7 D 3.4 0.8 NO3 . Lasselle St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 40.8 D 41.9 D 40.9 D 42.1 D 0.1 0.2 NO4 . Nason St/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 43.4 D 27.3 C 43.6 D 28.1 C 0.2 0.8 NO5 . Nason St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 39.1 D 29.4 C 39.4 D 30.3 C 0.3 0.9 NO 6 . Nason St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 24.2 C 22.6 C 24.2 C 22.6 C 0.0 0.0 NO 7 . Fir Ave/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 23.5 C 21.3 C 23.7 C 21.5 C 0.2 0.2 NO8 . Oliver St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 28.5 C 23.5 C 29.3 C 23.8 C 0.8 0.3 NO 9 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 16.5 B 15.2 B 17.1 B 15.4 B - - - 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 89.1 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - - 11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 30.2 C 32.5 C 33.3 C 39.9 D 3.1 7.4 NO12 . Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.1 B 10.9 B 11.6 B 16.3 C 1.5 5.4 NO 13 . Moreno Beach Dr/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 39.3 D 30.6 C 39.4 D 37.7 D 0.1 7.1 NO14 . Moreno Beach Blvd/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 26.2 C 29.7 C 26.6 C 29.8 C 0.4 0.1 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr/John F Kennedy Dr D Moreno Valley Signal 29.4 C 28.1 C 29.5 C 28.7 C 0.1 0.6 NO16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC 59.6 F * 16.2 C 64.6 F * 18.7 C - - - 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC 74.3 F * 60.7 F * 80.7 F * 80.0 F * - - -18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC 86.2 F * >100 F * 95.6 F * >100 F * - - - 19 . Dwy 1/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 9.2 A A 10.6 B 13.0 B 1.4 13.0 NO 20 . Dwy 2-Essen Ln/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 8.8 A 7.3 A 0.4 -1.0 NO 21 . Dwy 3/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 9.5 A 11.0 B 1.1 2.7 NO 22 . Dwy 4-Shubert St/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 10.3 B 13.4 B 1.9 5.1 NO 23 . Dwy 5/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 8.8 A 9.1 A 8.8 9.1 NO 24 . Redlands Blvd/Ironwood Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 19.8 B 13.8 B 20.1 C 13.8 B 0.3 0.0 NO25 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 27.5 C 39.9 D 27.6 C 47.3 D - - -26 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 20.4 C 25.0 C 28.8 C 26.9 C - - - 27 . Redlands Blvd/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 8.9 A 6.5 A 12.2 B 18.3 B 3.3 11.8 NO 28 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 6 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 10.1 B 11.9 B 10.1 11.9 NO29 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 7 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 10.0 B 11.8 B 10.0 11.8 NO30 . Redlands Blvd/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 20.5 C 18.2 C 6.5 A 5.8 A -14.0 -12.4 NO 31 . Redlands Blvd/Cottonwood Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 7.0 A 5.5 A 2.0 A 2.6 A -5.0 -2.9 NO 32 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley AWSC 26.7 D * 26.7 D * 41.3 E * 70.9 F * 14.6 44.2 YES 33 . Redlands Blvd-John F Kennedy Dr/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley AWSC 11.1 B 11.3 B 11.4 B 11.8 B 0.3 0.5 NO 34 . WLC Parkway/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.0 B 9.6 A 10.4 B 10.2 B 0.4 0.6 NO Notes:
* Exceeds LOS Standard
TWSC = Two-Way Stop Control; For TWSC intersections, reported delay is for worst-case approach/movement.LOS = Level of Service Table A-1: Existing Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised\Exist LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2203
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume Volume Requirement? 1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 13,775 D * 0.856 2MA 16,100 14,177 D * 0.881 - - 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 17,208 F * 1.069 2MA 16,100 17,668 F * 1.097 - - 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 17,452 F * 1.084 2MA 16,100 17,912 F * 1.113 - - 4 . Redlands Blvd north of Ironwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 18,086 F * 1.447 2U 12,500 18,546 F * 1.484 0.037 NO 5 . Redlands Blvd from Ironwood Ave to SR-60 WB Ramps City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,092 F * 1.207 2U 12,500 15,552 F * 1.244 0.037 NO 6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 14,403 F * 1.152 2U 12,500 16,055 F * 1.284 - - 7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,290 E * 0.983 2U 12,500 15,136 F * 1.211 0.228 YES 8 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 6 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 15,447 B 0.618 -0.385 NO 9 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 6 to Driveway 7 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 15,389 B 0.616 -0.387 NO 10 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 7 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 12,535 F * 1.003 4U 25,000 15,094 B 0.604 -0.399 NO 11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 10,585 D * 0.847 2U 12,500 12,081 E * 0.966 0.120 YES 12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 9,391 C 0.751 2U 12,500 10,771 D * 0.862 0.110 YES13 . Redlands Blvd from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 8,501 B 0.680 2U 12,500 8,847 C 0.708 0.028 NO14 . JFK Dr from Cactus Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley C 4U 25,000 5,797 A 0.232 4U 25,000 6,027 A 0.241 0.009 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 12,724 F * 1.018 2U 12,500 14,075 F * 1.126 - - 16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 23,934 B 0.638 4D 37,500 26,464 C 0.706 0.067 YES17 . Moreno Beach Dr from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 18,862 F * 1.509 2U 12,500 19,264 F * 1.541 0.032 NO 18 . Moreno Beach Dr from Cactus Ave to JFK Dr City of Moreno Valley C 6D 56,300 15,452 A 0.274 6D 56,300 15,854 A 0.282 0.007 NO 19 . Moreno Beach Dr from JFK Dr to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 15,898 A 0.282 6D 56,300 16,530 A 0.294 0.011 NO20 . Iris Ave From Nason St to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 19,248 A 0.342 6D 56,300 19,766 A 0.351 0.009 NO21 . Iris Ave From Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 30,134 A 0.535 6D 56,300 30,652 A 0.544 0.009 NO22 . Iris Ave From Kitching St to Lasselle St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 26,472 A 0.470 6D 56,300 26,760 A 0.475 0.005 NO 23 . Eucalyptus Ave from Nason St to Fir Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,376 A 0.375 4U 25,000 9,664 A 0.387 0.012 NO 24 . Eucalyptus Ave from Fir Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 14,002 A 0.373 4D 37,500 14,290 A 0.381 0.008 NO25 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 3,673 A 0.294 2U 12,500 6,663 A 0.533 0.239 NO 26 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 1,617 A 0.065 4U 25,000 4,837 A 0.193 0.129 NO 27 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 1,507 A 0.080 4U 25,000 4,496 A 0.180 0.099 NO28 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 5 City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,424 A 0.129 4U 25,000 5,413 A 0.217 0.087 NO29 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 5 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,424 A 0.129 4U 25,000 5,523 A 0.221 0.092 NO30 . Eucalyptus Ave from Redlands Blvd to World Logistics Center Driveway City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 2,612 A 0.209 2U 12,500 2,900 A 0.232 0.023 NO31 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 217 A 0.108 4U 25,000 793 A 0.032 -0.077 NO 32 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 217 A 0.108 4U 25,000 1,627 A 0.065 -0.043 NO33 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 475 A 0.237 4U 25,000 3,034 A 0.121 -0.116 NO 34 . Alessandro Blvd from Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 10,745 D 0.860 2U 12,500 11,033 D 0.883 0.023 NO35 . Alessandro Blvd from Nason St to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 9,553 C 0.764 2U 12,500 10,071 D 0.806 0.041 NO 36 . Alessandro Blvd from Moreno Beach Dr to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 5,549 A 0.444 2U 12,500 6,469 A 0.518 0.074 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Roadway
Capacity Classification LOS Standard LOS LOS
Table B-1: Existing Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) Without Project With Project
Classification Roadway Capacity
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS\Exist LOS 29 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2204
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Kitching St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 39.7 D * 37.3 D * 40.0 D * 38.2 D * 0.3 0.9 NO 2 . Lasselle St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 92.7 F * 60.8 E * 93.3 F * 63.6 E * 0.6 2.8 NO3 . Lasselle St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 48.6 D 55.0 E * 50.3 D 55.7 E * 1.7 0.7 NO4 . Nason St/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 67.2 E * 37.7 D 68.1 E * 38.8 D 0.9 1.1 NO5 . Nason St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 42.2 D 36.9 D 42.2 D 37.9 D 0.0 1.0 NO6 . Nason St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 30.8 C 29.8 C 31.0 C 32.6 C 0.2 2.8 NO 7 . Fir Ave/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 25.5 C 25.8 C 26.6 C 26.0 C 1.1 0.2 NO8 . Oliver St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 35.6 D 27.8 C 35.9 D 28.0 C 0.3 0.2 NO9 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 16.9 B 16.1 B 17.3 B 16.2 B - - - 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 30.4 C 37.1 D 37.0 D 59.0 E * 6.6 21.9 YES12 . Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 10.5 B 11.7 B 12.1 B 18.6 C 1.6 6.9 NO 13 . Moreno Beach Dr/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 70.3 E * 85.2 F * 72.0 E * >100 F * 1.7 14.2 YES 14 . Moreno Beach Blvd/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 30.4 C 33.2 C 30.6 C 33.6 C 0.2 0.4 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr/John F Kennedy Dr D Moreno Valley Signal 30.0 C 28.3 C 30.3 C 29.0 C 0.3 0.7 NO 16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC >100 F * 24.6 C >100 F * 31.2 D * - - - 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -19 . Dwy 1/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 9.5 A A 10.9 B 14.4 B 1.4 14.4 NO 20 . Dwy 2-Essen Ln/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 8.8 A 7.3 A 0.4 -1.0 NO 21 . Dwy 3/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.5 A 8.3 A 9.4 A 10.7 B 0.9 2.4 NO 22 . Dwy 4-Shubert St/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.4 A 8.3 A 10.4 B 13.4 B 2.0 5.1 NO 23 . Dwy 5/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 8.9 A 9.2 A 8.9 9.2 NO 24 . Redlands Blvd/Ironwood Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 21.0 C 19.5 B 21.0 C 26.3 C 0.0 6.8 NO 25 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 37.4 D 64.5 E * 41.6 D 71.7 E * - - - 26 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 40.9 D 32.1 C 37.5 D 49.9 D - - -27 . Redlands Blvd/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Roundabout 16.0 C 8.4 A 23.0 C 15.6 C 7.0 7.2 NO 28 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 6 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 10.5 B 13.6 B 10.5 13.6 NO29 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 7 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 10.3 B 13.5 B 10.3 13.5 NO30 . Redlands Blvd/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 30.5 D 26.9 D 3.2 A 4.8 A -27.3 -22.1 NO 31 . Redlands Blvd/Cottonwood Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 7.9 A 6.9 A 2.6 A 3.3 A -5.3 -3.6 NO 32 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley AWSC 95.1 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * 30.3 92.4 YES 33 . Redlands Blvd-John F Kennedy Dr/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley AWSC 21.8 C 31.2 D * 22.8 C 35.2 E * 1.0 4.0 NO 34 . WLC Parkway/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * 677.7 10626.4 YES Notes:
* Exceeds LOS Standard
TWSC = Two-Way Stop Control; For TWSC intersections, reported delay is for worst-case approach/movement.LOS = Level of Service Table C-1: Opening Year (2024) Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised\OY LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2205
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume Volume Requirement? 1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 15,849 E * 0.984 2MA 16,100 16,251 F * 1.009 - - 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 19,852 F * 1.233 2MA 16,100 20,312 F * 1.262 - - 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 20,216 F * 1.256 2MA 16,100 20,676 F * 1.284 - -4 . Redlands Blvd north of Ironwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 21,242 F * 1.699 2U 12,500 21,702 F * 1.736 0.037 NO5 . Redlands Blvd from Ironwood Ave to SR-60 WB Ramps City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 17,625 F * 1.410 2U 12,500 18,085 F * 1.447 0.037 NO6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,155 F * 1.452 2U 12,500 19,807 F * 1.585 - -7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 16,324 F * 1.306 2U 12,500 19,170 F * 1.534 0.228 YES 8 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 6 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 17,956 C 0.718 -0.485 NO 9 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 6 to Driveway 7 City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 17,898 C 0.716 -0.488 NO 10 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 7 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,044 F * 1.203 4U 25,000 17,603 C 0.704 -0.499 NO11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 12,891 F * 1.031 2U 12,500 14,387 F * 1.151 0.120 YES12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 11,794 E * 0.944 2U 12,500 13,174 F * 1.054 0.110 YES13 . Redlands Blvd from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 10,196 D * 0.816 2U 12,500 10,542 D * 0.843 0.028 NO 14 . JFK Dr from Cactus Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley C 4U 25,000 7,080 A 0.283 4U 25,000 7,310 A 0.292 0.009 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 18,159 F * 1.453 2U 12,500 19,510 F * 1.561 - - 16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 32,941 D 0.878 4D 37,500 35,471 E * 0.946 0.067 YES 17 . Moreno Beach Dr from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 25,697 F * 2.056 2U 12,500 26,099 F * 2.088 0.032 NO18 . Moreno Beach Dr from Cactus Ave to JFK Dr City of Moreno Valley C 6D 56,300 22,022 A 0.391 6D 56,300 22,424 A 0.398 0.007 NO 19 . Moreno Beach Dr from JFK Dr to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 26,091 A 0.463 6D 56,300 26,723 A 0.475 0.011 NO20 . Iris Ave From Nason St to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 29,723 A 0.528 6D 56,300 30,241 A 0.537 0.009 NO 21 . Iris Ave From Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 42,358 C 0.752 6D 56,300 42,876 C 0.762 0.009 NO 22 . Iris Ave From Kitching St to Lasselle St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 36,225 B 0.643 6D 56,300 36,513 B 0.649 0.005 NO23 . Eucalyptus Ave from Nason St to Fir Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 11,434 A 0.457 4U 25,000 11,722 A 0.469 0.012 NO24 . Eucalyptus Ave from Fir Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 17,687 A 0.472 4D 37,500 17,975 A 0.479 0.008 NO25 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 6,371 A 0.510 2U 12,500 9,361 C 0.749 0.239 NO26 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 2,943 A 0.118 4U 25,000 6,163 A 0.247 0.129 NO 27 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 2,822 A 0.150 4U 25,000 5,811 A 0.232 0.082 NO 28 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 5 City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 3,834 A 0.204 4U 25,000 6,823 A 0.273 0.068 NO 29 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 5 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 3U 18,750 3,834 A 0.204 4U 25,000 6,933 A 0.277 0.073 NO30 . Eucalyptus Ave from Redlands Blvd to World Logistics Center Driveway City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 6,042 A 0.483 2U 12,500 6,330 A 0.506 0.023 NO 31 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 240 A 0.120 4U 25,000 816 A 0.033 -0.087 NO 32 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 240 A 0.120 4U 25,000 1,650 A 0.066 -0.054 NO33 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2UR 2,000 524 A 0.262 4U 25,000 3,083 A 0.123 -0.138 NO 34 . Alessandro Blvd from Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 18,164 F * 1.453 2U 12,500 18,452 F * 1.476 0.023 NO 35 . Alessandro Blvd from Nason St to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 17,498 F * 1.400 2U 12,500 18,016 F * 1.441 0.041 NO 36 . Alessandro Blvd from Moreno Beach Dr to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 7,674 B 0.614 2U 12,500 8,594 B 0.688 0.074 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table D-1: Opening Year (2024) Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis)
LOS LOS
Classification Roadway Capacity LOS Standard Classification Roadway Capacity Without Project With Project D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS\OY LOS 36 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2206
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Exceed
LOS AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour City's Operational
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Requirement? 1 . Kitching St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 95.4 F * >100 F * 99.0 F * >100 F * 3.6 0.6 NO 2 . Lasselle St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 39.6 D 39.5 D 39.7 D 39.6 D 0.1 0.1 NO 3 . Lasselle St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 49.4 D 63.5 E * 49.8 D 64.6 E * 0.4 1.1 NO 4 . Nason St/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 58.4 E * 57.5 E * 58.4 E * 58.8 E * 0.0 1.3 NO5 . Nason St/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 44.8 D 40.6 D 44.8 D 40.7 D 0.0 0.1 NO 6 . Nason St/Iris Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 35.4 D * 63.5 E * 35.6 D * 63.9 E * 0.2 0.4 NO 7 . Fir Ave/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 32.6 C 34.1 C 32.8 C 34.4 C 0.2 0.3 NO 8 . Oliver St/Iris Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 34.0 C 32.2 C 34.2 C 32.4 C 0.2 0.2 NO9 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 2.8 A 0.2 A 2.8 A 0.1 A -- - 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 15.1 B 27.6 C 16.3 B 36.4 D - - - 11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 32.4 C 49.0 D 34.8 C 60.8 E * 2.4 11.8 YES 12 . Auto Mall Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 12.7 B 19.3 C 14.7 B 28.9 D 2.0 9.6 NO 13 . Moreno Beach Dr/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 36.8 D 37.9 D 36.8 D 38.4 D 0.0 0.5 NO 14 . Moreno Beach Blvd/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 29.6 C 28.5 C 29.7 C 28.7 C 0.1 0.2 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr/John F Kennedy Dr D Moreno Valley Signal 35.7 D 30.0 C 35.8 D 30.4 C 0.1 0.4 NO16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - - 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * >100 F * - - -19 . Dwy 1/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 11.5 B A 13.4 B 22.2 C 1.9 22.2 NO 20 . Dwy 2-Essen Ln/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.7 A 9.2 A 9.5 A 11.6 B 0.8 2.4 NO 21 . Dwy 3/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.7 A 9.2 A 9.5 A 12.0 B 0.8 2.8 NO22 . Dwy 4-Shubert St/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC 8.6 A 9.2 A 9.6 A 13.1 B 1.0 3.9 NO23 . Dwy 5/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 9.2 A 10.4 B 9.2 10.4 NO 24 . Redlands Blvd/Ironwood Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 25.9 C 32.2 C 26.1 C 24.7 C 0.2 -7.5 NO 25 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 9.6 A 7.5 A 11.6 B 8.0 A -- - 26 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 14.7 B 20.7 C 15.6 B 14.7 B - - - 27 . Redlands Blvd/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Roundabout 8.6 A 16.1 C 10.2 B 42.8 E * 1.6 26.7 YES 28 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 6 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 12.1 B 16.0 C 12.1 16.0 NO 29 . Redlands Blvd/Dwy 7 D Moreno Valley TWSC A A 11.9 B 15.9 C 11.9 15.9 NO30 . Redlands Blvd/Encilia Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 14.1 B 28.0 C 17.8 B 40.3 D 3.7 12.3 NO 31 . Redlands Blvd/Cottonwood Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 4.3 A 8.4 A 4.3 A 8.5 A 0.0 0.1 NO 32 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley Signal 28.9 C 28.0 C 29.0 C 28.9 C 0.1 0.9 NO 33 . Redlands Blvd-John F Kennedy Dr/Cactus Ave C Moreno Valley Signal 28.7 C 24.9 C 28.7 C 24.9 C 0.0 0.0 NO34 . WLC Parkway/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 26.0 C 49.2 D 26.6 C 51.4 D 0.6 2.2 NO Notes:
* Exceeds LOS Standard
TWSC = Two-Way Stop Control; For TWSC intersections, reported delay is for worst-case approach/movement.LOS = Level of Service Table E-1: General Plan Build-Out (2040) Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) Without Project With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Change in Delay
Future Intersection
Future Intersection Future Intersection
Future Intersection
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised\2040 LOS F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2207
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Exceed City's
Daily V/C Daily V/C Change in V/C Operational
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS Requirement? 1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 21,100 F * 1.311 21,502 F * --- 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 24,137 F * 1.499 24,597 F * --- 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 25,853 F * 1.606 26,313 F * --- 4 . Redlands Blvd north of Ironwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 4D 37,500 23,883 B 0.637 24,343 B 0.649 0.012 NO 5 . Redlands Blvd from Ironwood Ave to SR-60 WB Ramps City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 22,667 B 0.604 23,127 B 0.617 0.012 NO6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 4D 37,500 25,690 B 0.685 27,342 C - - - 7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 26,068 B 0.695 28,914 C 0.771 0.076 NO 8 . Redlands Blvd from Eucalyptus Ave to Driveway 6 City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 28,187 C 0.752 0.078 NO 9 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 6 to Driveway 7 City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 28,129 C 0.750 0.076 NO 10 . Redlands Blvd from Driveway 7 to Encilia Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 25,275 B 0.674 27,834 C 0.742 0.068 NO11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 4D 37,500 16,675 A 0.445 18,171 A 0.485 0.040 NO 12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 4D 37,500 15,667 A 0.418 17,047 A 0.455 0.037 NO 13 . Redlands Blvd from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley C 4D 37,500 10,706 A 0.285 11,052 A 0.295 0.009 NO 14 . JFK Dr from Cactus Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley C 4U 25,000 12,915 A 0.517 13,145 A 0.526 0.009 NO15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 6D 56,300 24,982 A 0.444 26,333 A - - - 16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 44,511 C 0.791 47,041 D 0.836 0.045 NO17 . Moreno Beach Dr from Alessandro Blvd to Cactus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 32,569 A 0.578 32,971 A 0.586 0.007 NO18 . Moreno Beach Dr from Cactus Ave to JFK Dr City of Moreno Valley C 6D 56,300 25,486 A 0.453 25,888 A 0.460 0.007 NO 19 . Moreno Beach Dr from JFK Dr to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 33,716 A 0.599 34,348 B 0.610 0.011 NO 20 . Iris Ave From Nason St to Oliver St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 45,638 D 0.811 46,156 D 0.820 0.009 NO21 . Iris Ave From Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 61,514 F * 1.093 62,032 F * 1.102 0.009 NO22 . Iris Ave From Kitching St to Lasselle St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 50,410 D 0.895 50,698 E * 0.900 0.005 NO 23 . Eucalyptus Ave from Nason St to Fir Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 26,165 F * 1.047 26,453 F * 1.058 0.012 NO24 . Eucalyptus Ave from Fir Ave to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 28,783 C 0.768 29,071 C 0.775 0.008 NO 25 . Eucalyptus Ave from Moreno Beach Dr to Auto Mall Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 12,586 A 0.503 15,576 B 0.623 0.120 NO 26 . Eucalyptus Ave from Auto Mall Dr to Driveway 1 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 8,251 A 0.330 11,471 A 0.459 0.129 NO 27 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 1 to Aldi Pl City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 7,912 A 0.316 10,901 A 0.436 0.120 NO 28 . Eucalyptus Ave Aldi Pl to Driveway 5 City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,978 A 0.399 12,967 A 0.519 0.120 NO 29 . Eucalyptus Ave from Driveway 5 to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 9,978 A 0.399 13,077 A 0.523 0.124 NO 30 . Eucalyptus Ave from Redlands Blvd to World Logistics Center Driveway City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 19,426 C 0.777 19,714 C 0.789 0.012NO 31 . Encilia Ave from Essen Ln to Mozart Way City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 3,996 A 0.160 4,572 A 0.183 0.023 NO32 . Encilia Ave from Mozart Way to Shubert St City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 3,996 A 0.160 5,406 A 0.216 0.056 NO33 . Encilia Ave Shubert St to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4U 25,000 4,312 A 0.172 6,871 A 0.275 0.102 NO34 . Alessandro Blvd from Lasselle St to Nason St City of Moreno Valley D 6D 56,300 36,212 B 0.643 36,500 B 0.648 0.005 NO 35 . Alessandro Blvd from Nason St to Moreno Beach Dr City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 26,984 C 0.720 27,502 C 0.733 0.014 NO 36 . Alessandro Blvd from Moreno Beach Dr to Redlands Blvd City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 27,143 C 0.724 28,063 C 0.748 0.025 NO Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table F-1 General Plan Build-Out (2040) Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) LOS
Standard Classification Roadway Capacity
Without Project With Project
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS\2040 LOS 47 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2208
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - With Project With Improvements
LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * Signal 32.4 C 37.3 D16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC 64.6 F * 18.7 C Signal 0.9 A 0.6 A 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC 80.7 F * 80.0 F * Signal 17.1 B 12.0 B 18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC 95.6 F * >100 F * Signal 12.7 B 16.7 B32 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley AWSC 41.3 E * 70.9 F * Signal 15.6 C 17.6 B Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table G-1: Existing With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised\Exist LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2209
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 14,177 D * 4MA 37,200 14,177 C 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 17,668 F * 4MA 37,200 17,668 C 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 17,912 F * 4MA 37,200 17,912 C 6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 16,055 F * 4D 37,500 16,055 A7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 15,136 F * 4D 37,500 15,136 A 11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 12,081 E * 4D 37,500 12,081 A12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 10,771 D * 4D 37,500 10,771 A15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 14,075 F * 4D 37,500 14,075 A16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 26,464 C 4D 37,500 26,464 C Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table H-1: Existing with Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) LOS
Standard
With Project With Project With Improvements
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS\Exist LOS MIT 55 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2210
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - With Project With Improvements
LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 10 . Moreno Beach Dr/SR-60 EB Ramps D Caltrans Signal >100 F * >100 F * Signal 37.7 D 42.4 D11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 37.0 D 59.0 E * Signal 34.2 C 39.7 D13 . Moreno Beach Dr/Alessandro Blvd D Moreno Valley Signal 72.0 E * >100 F * Signal 49.1 D 69.5 E *16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC >100 F * 31.2 D * Signal 1.2 A 0.7 A 17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 26.7 C 14.4 B 18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 9.8 A 17.2 B 25 . Redlands Blvd/SR-60 WB Ramps D Caltrans Signal 41.6 D 71.7 E * Signal 36.8 D 59.9 E *32 . Redlands Blvd/Alessandro Blvd C Moreno Valley AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 22.1 C 64.8 E * 34 . WLC Parkway/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley TWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 12.0 B 29.5 C Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Table I-1: Opening Year (2024) With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) With Project
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised\OY LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2211
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 16,251 F * 4MA 37,200 16,251 C 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 20,312 F * 4MA 37,200 20,312 C 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 20,676 F * 4MA 37,200 20,676 C 6 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 19,807 F * 4D 37,500 19,807 A7 . Redlands Blvd from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 2U 12,500 19,170 F * 4D 37,500 19,170 A 11 . Redlands Blvd from Encilia Ave to Cottonwood Ave City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 14,387 F * 4D 37,500 14,387 A12 . Redlands Blvd from Cottonwood Ave to Alessandro Blvd City of Moreno Valley C 2U 12,500 13,174 F * 4D 37,500 13,174 A15 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 WB Ramps to SR-60 EB Ramps Caltrans D 2U 12,500 19,510 F * 4D 37,500 19,510 A16 . Moreno Beach Dr from SR-60 EB Ramps to Eucalyptus Ave City of Moreno Valley D 4D 37,500 35,471 E * 6D 56,300 35,471 B Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table J-1: Opening Year (2024) With Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) LOS
Standard
With Project With Project With Improvements
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS\OY LOS MIT 60 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2212
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - With Project With Improvements
LOS
Intersection Standard Jurisdiction Control Delay LOS Delay LOS Control Delay LOS Delay LOS 11 . Moreno Beach Dr/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Signal 34.8 C 60.8 E * Signal 33.4 D 45.1 D16 . Alessandro Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Redlands AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 1.8 A 1.3 A17 . Live Oak Canyon Rd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 27.2 C 27.0 C18 . Redlands Blvd/San Timoteo Canyon Rd C Riverside County AWSC >100 F * >100 F * Signal 16.7 B 20.3 C27 . Redlands Blvd/Eucalyptus Ave D Moreno Valley Roundabout 10.2 B 42.8 E * Roundabout 10.1 A 28.3 D Notes:
LOS = Level of Service
Table K-1: General Plan Build-Out (2040) With Project With Improvements Intersection Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
With Project
D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\LOS Revised\2040 LOS MIT F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2213
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - the transportation solutions company...
Daily Daily
Roadway Segment Jurisdiction Volume LOS Volume LOS
1 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Alessandro Rd to Live Oak Canyon Rd City of Redlands/Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 21,502 F * 4MA 37,200 21,502 C 2 . San Timoteo Canyon Rd from Live Oak Canyon Rd to Redlands Blvd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 24,597 F * 4MA 37,200 24,597 C 3 . Redlands Blvd south of San Timoteo Canyon Rd Riverside County C 2MA 16,100 26,313 F * 4MA 37,200 26,313 C Notes:
LOS = Level of Service, 2MA=2-Lane Mountain Arterial, 2U=2-Lane Undivided, 4U=4-Lane Undivided, 6D=6-Lane Divided, 4D=4-Lane Divided, 2UR=2-Lane Undivided Residential Table L-1: General Plan Build-Out (2040) With Project With Improvements Roadway Segment Levels of Service (Previous Analysis) With Project With Improvements LOS
Standard
With Project
Classification Roadway Capacity Classification Roadway Capacity D:\Projects\Hillwood - Moreno Valley Trade Center\Analysis Alt 1 and 2\xRoadway LOS\2040 LOS MIT 64 F.1.n
Packet Pg. 2214
Attachment: Traffic Memorandums (Warehouse and E-Commerce) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - 12974-08 (Warehouse) Memo
April 25, 2022
Mr. John Grace
Hillwood
901 Via Piemonte Suite 175
Ontario, CA 91764
MORENO VALLEY TRADE CENTER (WAREHOUSE SCENARIO) AIR QUALITY,
GREENHOUSE GAS, AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT EVALUATION
Mr. John Grace,
Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Air Quality (AQ), Greenhouse Gas (GHG), and Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Evaluation for the Moreno Valley Trade Center (Warehouse Scenario) development which is located in the City of Moreno Valley. The purpose of this work effort is to assess the potential changes in air quality, greenhouse gas, and health risks associated with the updated site plan for the Project.
BACKGROUND
On October 9, 2020, Urban Crossroads, Inc. prepared an AQ, GHG, and HRA Evaluation for the proposed Moreno Valley Trade Center Warehouse development (1). At the time the study was prepared, the proposed Project included the construction of approximately 50,000 sf of High-Cube Cold Storage facilities and 1,282,380 sf of E-Commerce facilities. Since then, the Project now proposes approximately 50,000 sf of High-Cube Cold Storage facilities and 1,213,271 sf of warehouse facilities (as illustrated on Exhibit 1). Therefore, for purposes of analysis in this memorandum, the Project now includes a reduction of 69,109 sf of building space. This memorandum includes the comparison of the emissions totals in the prior evaluation to what is now being proposed.
F.1.o
Packet Pg. 2215 Attachment: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Health Risk Assessment Evaluation (Warehouse) for Moreno Valley Trade Center - Revised Mr. John Grace
Hillwood
April 28, 2022