Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
anymore severe as a result of the proposed Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Cumulative Impacts
Impacts associated with hazardous materials are often site -specific and localized. While impacts are minimized with implementation of General Plan policies, impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials were considered less than significant and no mitigation was required under the General Plan Program EIR. As identified in the General Plan Program EIR, the General Plan would continue to develop new land uses in the City, possibly exposing persons to hazardous materials through improper handling or use of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes during construction or operation of future developments, or proposed land uses in areas that would create hazards for people working or residing in the area. However, compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local regulations related to hazardous materials on a project -by -project basis would ensure thatthe routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials would not result in adverse impacts. All demolition activities that would involve asbestos or lead -based paint would also occur in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1403 and OSHA Construction Safety Orders, which would ensure that hazardous materials impacts would be less than significant. With adherence to applicable federal, state, and local regulations governing hazardous materials and compliance with the General Plan policies, the potential risks associated with hazardous wastes inthe area would be less than significant. Implementation of the proposed Project would not alter the conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR analysis and would not result in a new or substantially more severe project -specific or cumulative hazards impactthanthose already analyzed.
Mitigation Program
Relevant General Plan Policies
The following policies are applicable to the proposed Project and would be made conditions of approval. ■ LU 6.15.24 - Airport Compatibility: Require that all development be constructed within the height limits and residential be located outside of areas exposed to the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour specified by the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP), unless the City Council makes appropriate findings for an override in accordance with applicable law. ■ S 7.4 - Implementation of Remediation Efforts: Minimize the potential risk of contamination to surface water and groundwater resources and implement remediation efforts to any resources adversely impacted by urban activities.
Conclusion
As discussed above, the proposed Project would not cause a new hazardous materials impact to occur, nor an increase in the severity of a hazardous material impact previously disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR, with compliance with all state and local regulations, along with General Plan policies discussed in this section. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause either a new cumulative impact to occur, nor an increase in the severityof a cumulative impact previously disclosed. 110 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality
Threshold(a) Would the project violate anywater quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or grou nd water quality? General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that construction and operations of future development would result in a less than significant impact related to violations of water quality standards. Areas that disturb one or more acres of land surface are subject to the Construction General Permit adopted by the SWRCB. Preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for compliance with the NPDES General Construction Stormwater Activity Permit. Certain projects require the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Construction would also need to comply with the requirements of Citys Municipal Code Chapter 14.36 which regulates water quality. Under the provisions of this chapter, any discharge that would result in or contribute to degradation of water quality via stormwater runoff is prohibited. New development or redevelopment projects are required to comply with provisions in the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP), including the implementation of appropriate BMPs to control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing beneficial uses of the water. Impacts were considered less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
The proposed Project would create new types of pollutant sources associated with residential development that could alterthetypes of constituents or levels of pollutants contained in post -developed site runoff. In order to reduce the amount of pollutants in storm water runoff from the proposed Project and to minimize associated hydrologic and waterquality impacts, BMPs are required to be implemented in accordance with City, State, and RWQCB standards, set forth in SC WQ-1, SC WQ-2, and SC WQ-3.
Construction of the proposed Project, similarto construction associated with development analyzed and assumed under the General Plan, would be subject to the Construction General Permit, City's Municipal Code Chapter 14.36 requirements, the Orange County DAMP, and the General Plan policies. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not violate water quality standards or substantially degrade water quality; this impact would be less than significant. This is consistent with the impact conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR.
Threshold (b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the projectmay impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City is not located within an identified recharge area, as recharge primarily occurs in the upper portions of the Orange County Groundwater Basin. Groundwater table depths could occur as shallow as 50feet. Development footprints could encounter groundwater, although support and foundation structures in the groundwater would not displace enough volume to be considered substantial. Construction activities were considered to not substantially deplete groundwater supplies nor interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. The City of Newport Beach Water Master Plan, which assumed the demand associated with General Plan buildout, identifies that projected groundwater supplies would meet projected demand throughout the City. The Natural Resources Element of the General Plan identifies goals and related policies designed to 111 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
minimize water consumption and expand the use of alternative water sources to provide adequate water supplies for present use and future growth. According tothe City of Newport Beach's 2005 Urban Water Management Plan (2005 UWMP) referenced in the General Plan Program EIR, water supplies would continue to meet the City's imported water needs until 2030. The Orange County Water District (OCWD), which provides the groundwater supply to the City, projects that there would be sufficient groundwater supplies to meet any future demand requirements in Newport Beach. Impacts were considered less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
With implementation of the proposed Project, approximately 0.34 acre (18%) of the 1.97-acre project site would be pervious and 1.59 acres (82%) would have imperious surfaces. This is an increase oftwo percent compared to existing site conditions. Similar to the development assumed under the General Plan, the Project would occur in an already developed area and would not substantially decrease groundwater recharge. The proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan and zoning designations andtherefore site development would have been accounted for in the City's Water Master Plan, which finds there is groundwater available for the growth proposed in the General Plan. Additionally, there are no public water wells located on the project site and groundwater is not drawn from the area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge, anygreaterthanalreadyanalyzed inthe General Plan Program EIR andthis impact would be less than significant. This is consistent with the impact conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR.
Threshold (c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition ofimpervious surfaces,in a mannerwhich would:
i) Result in a substantial erosion orsiltation on-oroff-site.
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. Refer to section threshold (a) above. Impacts would be less than significant and there are no changes or new information requiring preparation of an EIR.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
The project site is currently developed as a two-storyoffice building with surface parking and landscaping.
The proposed storm drain system would largely maintain the same existing drainage patterns, and connectivity. The construction of the proposed Project would not increase the overall drainage areas in the proposed condition. Clearing, grading, excavation, and construction activities associated with the Project may impact water quality by induced sheet erosion of exposed soils and the subsequent deposition of particulates in local drainages. Grading activities and sediment stockpiles can lead to exposed areas of loose soil that are susceptible to uncontrolled sheet flow and wind erosion. In compliance with NPDES regulations, the State of California requires that any construction activity disturbing one acre or more of soil comply with the General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit (Construction General Permit). The permit requires development and implementation of a SWPPP and monitoring plan, which must include erosion -control and sediment -control BMPs that would meet or 112 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
exceed measures required by the Construction General Permit to control potential construction -related pollutants.
Therefore, implementation of the General Plan policies and compliance with NPDES regulations and the City's Municipal Code would reduce the risk of substantial erosion or siltation on or off -site from drainage alterations to less than significant. Therefore, no changes or new information require preparation of an EIR.
Threshold (c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces,in a mannerwhich would:
ii) Substantially increase the rate oramount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on-oroff-site.
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR noted that increased impervious surfaces would increase stormwater runoff in the City. This increased runoff could exceed the capacity of existing and planned infrastructure and cause downstream flooding impacts. Several General Plan policies are intended to reduce stormwater runoff would also apply to runoff -related flooding impacts. These policies include NR 3.10, NR 3.11, NR 4.4, NR 3.20, S 5.3, NR 3.16, and NR 3.21. These policies require preparation of a WQMP, implementation of BMPs, incorporation of stormwater detention facilities, design of drainage facilities to minimize adverse effects on water quality, minimize increases in impervious areas. Implementation of these policies would also reduce the volume of runoff generated, and potential for flooding. Compliance with the methods and provisions contained in Chapter 15.50 of the City's Municipal Code would also minimize flood hazards resulting from drainage alterations. Therefore, implementation of General Plan policies and compliance with NPDES regulations, the City's Municipal Code, and California Fish and Wildlife regulations would reduce the risk of flooding resulting from drainage alterations to a less than significant impact.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The project site is currently developed as a two-story office building and associated surface parking and landscaping. Reuse of the site with a residential building and parking structure would not increase the rate or amount of surface runoff sothat it would result in a significant increase in flooding on or off of the site or exceedance of the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. With implementation of the proposed Project, there would be an increase of two percent compared to existing site conditions.
The Project would require BMPs to treat the drainage associated with the proposed impervious areas of the Project. I mplementation of the Project would not cause flooding on or off of site and impacts on storm drainage capacity would be less than significant. Therefore, implementation of the General Plan policies and compliance with NPDES regulations and the City's Municipal Code would reduce the risk of flooding resulting from drainage alterations to less than significant. Therefore, no changes or new information require preparation subsequent environmental documentation. 113 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Threshold (c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces,in a mannerwhich would:
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sourcesof polluted runoff.
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that existing storm drainage facilities at the time would not be able to serve future development assumed in the General Plan. However, the Public Infrastructure Plan in the General Plan specifies that the City and County would review the Storm Drain Master Plan to assure that adequate facilities are provided to serve permitted land use development. Construction of necessarystorm drainage upgrades in and of itself would result in impacts separate from the General Plan. Upgrades, expansion, and construction of necessary utilities to accommodate new development would be subject to project - specific environmental review. Impacts weretherefore considered less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
The project site currently drains in two directions: approximately 70 percent of flows are directed toward Spruce Street and 30 percent drains toward Bristol Street North. The site is considered relatively flat with one to two percent grade to provide sheet flow within the existing surface parking lot area. The parking lot drainage is collected by a series of concrete swales that are collected by storm drain lines. Flows are ultimately discharged to Spruce Street. Once the flows enter the existing curb and gutter along Spruce Street, they are conveyed to the north and are discharged into a storm drain system in Quail Street.
The proposed Project would maintain the existing drainage pattern. Drainage areas south of the on -site high point would drain to Bristol Street and drainage areas north of the high point would drain to Spruce Street. The Project proposes three drainage management areas to treat runoff, primarily through biotreatment planters. Each treatment area would have a 24-inch parkway drain. A proposed six-inch storm drain would run through the northwest project site perimeter, connecting all three biotreatment planter areas.
As previously discussed, and as identified in Table 3.9-1, Runoff Volume Summary, the proposed Project would result in the conveyance of slightly more water to the storm drain system because the new development would reduce the pervious surface percentage at the project site by two percent. However, the increase in runoff volume would not exceed the allowable five percent pursuant to Section 5.3 of the County of Orange Technical Guidance Document for the Preparation of Conceptual/Preliminary and/or Project Water Quality Management Plans (2013). Therefore, no hydrologic conditions of concern (HCOC) would occur (see Appendix C). Implementation of the proposed Project would not alter the conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR analysis and would not result in a new or substantially more severe infrastructure orwaterquality impacts thanthose already analyzed. 114 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Table3.9-1: Runoff Volume Summary (2-year, 24-hourstorm event) Drainage
Area
Existing Condition
Proposed Condition
Area (acre)
Volume (cf)
Area (acre)
Volume (cf)
A
0.40 174
0.45 210
B
1.54 778
0.92 492
C
-
-
0.57 268
Total
1.94 952
1.94 970
cf = cubic feet
Source: Tait& Associates, Inc., 2021.
Threshold (c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition ofimpervious surfaces,in a mannerwhich would:
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows.
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR noted that intensification of development would increasethe area of land covered by structures, leaving less available ground surface area over which flood flows could travel. Several of the nine planning subareas planned for development as set forth in the General Plan are within the 100-year flood zone.
Parts of Mariners' Mile, the western portion of Banning Ranch, Balboa Village, Balboa Peninsula, Balboa Island, and West Newport Highway are susceptible to 100-yearflood conditions.
General Plan implementation was not anticipated to substantially increase obstructions to flood flows, with the exception of potential development at Banning Ranch. A water displacement analysis would be required to investigate the effect of new structural development or fill on flooding depth, pursuant to FEMA regulation 44 CFR 60.3 (c)(10). Preparation of water displacement analyses where appropriate and compliance with FEMA regulations would ensure that General Plan implementation would not substantially impede or redirect flows. Impacts were considered less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The project site is approximately 2,000feet north of the nearest flood hazard area and is not in a 100-year flood zone. Implementation of the proposed Project would not alterthe conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR analysis and would not result in a new or substantially more severe impacts related to flood hazards.
Threshold (d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR addresses potential risks from seiches and tsunamis. Compliance with requirements set forth in the Safety Element of the General Plan would minimize the impact of flooding, including flooding as a result of seiche and tsunami inundation. All new development in the City occurring in areas that are subject to flood hazards would be required to comply with the flood damage prevention provisions of the City's 115 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Municipal Code. Therefore, risks associated with inundation by seiche, tsunami, and mudflow are considered to be less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The project site is not proximate to flood hazard, tsunami, seiche, and project inundation hazards. The project site is approximately 2,000 feet north of the nearest flood hazard area and is not within a flood zone. The site is not within a Tsunami Advisory Evacuation Zone or a Tsunami Run Up Area.17 The site is about five miles from the Pacific Ocean and is at a higher elevation from standing bodies of water. Further, the project site is approximately 2,300 feet north of the nearest dam, the San Joaquin Reservoir, but is not directly in the path of any potential downstream hazards resulting from a dam breach. Therefore, the project site is not subject to flood, tsunami, or seiche hazards. The proposed Project would not result in any new adverse impacts or increase the severityof any previously identified impacts. No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impact the prior finding under this threshold. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Threshold (e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that impacts to water quality control plans or groundwater management plans were less than significant. The City is under the jurisdiction of the Santa Ana RWQCB, which establishes water quality objectives and standards for both surface and groundwater of the region, and water quality discharge requirements. Underthe Santa Ana RWQCB's NPDESpermit system, all existing andfuture municipal and industrial discharges to surface waters within the Citywould be subject to regulations. NPDES permits are required for operators of MS4s, construction projects, and industrial facilities. Developments within the Citywould also be subject tothe provisions in Chapter 14.36, Water Quality, ofthe Municipal Code. Under the provisions of this chapter, any discharge that would result in or contribute to degradation of water quality via stormwater runoff is prohibited. Operation of new development or redevelopment projects are required comply with provisions set forth in the DAMP, including the implementation of appropriate BMPs identified in the DAMP, to control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing beneficial uses of the water.
General Plan Policy NR 3.6 requires that development not result in the degradation of natural water bodies. The OCWD manages the Orange County Groundwater Basin through the Groundwater Management Plan. Consistent with the OCWD Groundwater Management Plan, the Natural Resources Element of the General Plan identifies goals and related policies designed to minimize water consumption and expand the use of alternative water sources to provide adequate water supplies for present use and future growth. Implementation of these policies would ensure water conservation and reduce potential impacts to groundwater supply. Impacts were considered less than significant. 17 https://www.newportbeachca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/64418/636989626695570000 and https://www.newportbeachca.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=1093 . 2021. 116 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
Newport Beach is under the jurisdiction ofthe Santa Ana RWQCB. The Santa Ana River Basin WaterQuality Control Plan is the basis forthe RWQCB's regulatory programs and establisheswaterquality standards for the ground and surface waters of the region. As indicated under threshold (a), the proposed Project, similar to development pursuant to the General Plan, would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality, and would therefore not conflict with the water quality control plan.
OCWD adopted its most recent groundwater management plan in 2015. This plan sets basin management goals and objectives and describes how the basin is managed. The project site is within the City's water service area. According to the 2020 UWMP, the City's 2020 water supply was approximately 15,005 AF, which was combination of 4,255 AF of imported water, 10,237AFof groundwater, and 513 AF of recycled water. The City anticipates that its supply capabilities will balance anticipated total water use and supply from 2021 to 2045 under normal year, single dry year, and multiple dry year conditions. The buildout of the proposed Project is estimated to generate a water demand of approximately 67,680 gallons per day (gpd), or 75.8 AFY, which does not account for the water use associated with the existing office building.
This worst -case demand represents less than one percent of the City's anticipated water supply through 2045 during a normal year, single dry year, and multiple dry year conditions and would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interferes ubsta ntia Ily with groundwater recharge such that the Project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin. The 2020 UWMP found that the City's supply capabilities are expected to balance anticipated total water use and supply and to accommodate normal years, single dry years, and multiple dry -year events. The UWMP indicated that there is adequate existing and planned water supply to accommodate future development accounted for in the General Plan inclusive of the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation for the 6th Cycle planning period of 2021-2029 and its associated water demands The Project would implement environmentally sustainable practices including but not limited to water - efficient landscaping; electric vehicle charging stations; and water quality BMPs to treat surface runoff from the project site. Therefore, the proposed Project, similar to development pursuant to the General Plan, would not degrade groundwater quality, substantially decrease groundwater supplies, or interfere substantiallywith groundwater recharge. Impactswould be less than significant, and there are nochanges or new information on requiring preparation of an EIR. No new impact would result, norwould the impact previously identified be any more severe as a result of the proposed Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent withthe effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed above, the proposed Project would not cause a new hydrological impact to occur, nor an increase inthe severityof a hydrological impact previously disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR, with implementation of the mitigation measures discussed in this section. Implementation of the proposed Project would not alterthe conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR analysis and would not result in a new or substantially more severe project -specific or cumulative drainage or water quality impact than those already analyzed.
117 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
The General Plan includes policies that address issues related to hydrology and water quality. The following policies are applicable to the proposed Project and would be made conditions of approval. ■ NR 3.2 - Chemical Use Impacts: Support regulations limiting or banning the use insecticides, fertilizers, and other chemicals which are shown to be detrimental to waterquality. ■ NR 3.3 - Ground Water Contamination: Suspend activities and implement appropriate health and safety procedures in the event that previously unknown groundwater contamination is encountered during construction. Where site contamination is identified, implementan appropriate remediation strategythatis approved bythe Cityand the state agencywith appropriate jurisdiction. ■ NR 3.4- Storm Drain Sewer System Permit: Require all development to comply with the regulations under the City's municipal separate storm drain system permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System.
■ NR3.9-Water Quality Management Plan: Require newdevelopment applicationsto includea Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to minimize runoff from rainfall events during construction and post -construction.
■ NR 3.10 - Best Management Practices: Implement and improve upon Best Management Practices (BMPs) for residences, businesses, development projects, and City operations. ■ NR 3.11 - Site Design and Source Control: Include site design and source control BMPs in all developments. When the combination of site design and source control BMPs are not sufficientto protect water quality as required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), structural treatment BMPswill be implemented along with site design and source control measures. ■ NR 3.13 - Reduction of Infiltration: Include equivalent BMPs that do not require infiltration, where infiltration of runoff would exacerbate geologic hazards. ■ NR 3.14 Runoff Reduction on Private Property. Retain runoff on private property to prevent the transport of pollutants into natural water bodies, to the maximum extent practicable. ■ NR 3.15 - Street Drainage Systems: Require all street drainage systems and other physical improvements created bythe City, or developers of new subdivisions, to be designed, constructed, and maintained to minimize adverse impacts on waterquality. Investigate the possibility of treating or diverting streetdrainage to minimize impacts to water bodies. ■ NR 3.17 - Parking Lots and Rights -of -Way: Require that parking lots and public and private rights -of -way be maintained and cleaned frequentlyto remove debris and contaminated residue. • NR 3.19 - Natural Drainage Systems: Require incorporation of natural drainage systems and stormwater detention facilities into new developments, where appropriate and feasible, to retain stormwater in order to increase groundwater recharge.
• NR3.20- Impervious Surfaces: Require new development a nd public improvements to minimizethe creation of and increases in impervious surfaces, especiallydirectly connected impervious areas, to 118 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
the maximum extent practicable. Require redevelopment to increase area of pervious surfaces, where feasible.
■ NR 4.4 - Erosion Minimization: Require grading/erosion control plans with structural BMPs that prevent or minimize erosion during and after construction for development on steep slopes, graded, or disturbed areas.
Standard Conditionsand Reauirements
Sc WQ-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, an SWPPP and Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with the General Permit for Construction Activities shall be prepared, submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and made part of the construction program. This SWPPP shall detail measures and practices that would be in effect during construction to minimize the Project's impact on water quality and stormwater runoff volumes.
SC WQ-2 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the Project, subject to the approval of the Community Development Department. The WQMP shall include appropriate BMPs to ensure project runoff is adequately treated.
SC WQ-3 During construction, if groundwater is unexpectedly encountered, the Applicant shall apply for dewatering coverage and adhere to the monitoring and reporting program under the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES).
Conclusion
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to hydrology and water quality or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regardto PRC Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known atthe time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of less than significant with mitigation. Therefore, preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted.
119 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.10 Land Use a nd Planning
Threshold (a) Would the project physically divide an established community? General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that the General Plan would not include any roadway extensions or other development features through currently developed areas; instead, it would allow limited infill development in select subareas in the City. The General Plan Program EIR did not include any extensions of roadways or other development features through currently developed areas that could physically divide an established community. Therefore, the General Plan Program EIR would not physically divide an established community and impacts were identified as being less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The City of Newport Beach is nearly built out, and the proposed Project is an infill development in an urbanized area. The proposed Project would not include any roadway extensions or other development features through currently developed areas. No off -site improvements such as new roadways or infrastructure are proposed that could physically divide an established community. The proposed Project would demolish the existing two-story office building and construct a residential apartment building on the site. Specifically, the site is zoned General Commercial Site 4 with a Residential Overlay of PC-11, where multi -family residential development is permitted as a stand-alone use provided minimum affordable housing requirements are met. The proposed Project includes affordable housing units.
Therefore, the proposed Project, similar to development pursuant to the General Plan, would not physically divide an established community and there would be no impacts. Therefore, there are no changes or new significant information that would require preparation of an EIR.
Threshold (b) Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR analyzed land use incompatibility with regard to introducing new land uses and structures that could result in intensification of development in the City. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that the majority of land use changes proposed would not result in incompatibilities or nuisances that rose to a level of significance and impacts were considered less than significant. The General Plan Program EIR was found to be consistent with all applicable land use plans for the City. The Airport Area is in the boundaries of the John Wayne Airport AELUP. Provided that residential uses remain outsidethe 65dBACNELcontour, the General Plan would be consistent with the AELUP. The City of Newport Beach is subject to policies within the Orange County Central and Coastal Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP). Future development was required to comply with policies within the plan, and therefore no impact occurred.
It is important to note that the General Plan Program EIR concluded a significant and unavoidable impact related to General Plan Policy LU 6.15.24. General Plan Policy LU 6.15.24 states that development must be constructed within the height limits and residential uses must be located outside of areas exposed to the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour identified in the John Wayne Airport AELUP, unless the City Council makes 120 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
appropriate findings for an override in accordance with applicable law. This policy allows the possibility for residential development to occur within the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour or height limits to be exceeded. Residential development within any area inside the 65 dBACNELwould result in conflicts with AELUP Policy 3.2.1, which results in a finding of inconsistent land uses if development places people so that they are affected adversely by aircraft noise or concentrates people in areas susceptible to aircraft accidents.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
General Plan Consistency
The project site has a General Plan land use categoryof Mixed -Use Horizontal-2 (MU-112), which provides for a horizontal intermixing of uses that may include regional commercial office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed -use buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and ancillary neighborhood commercial uses. The MU-112 designation applies to a majority of properties in the Airport Area, inclusive of the project site and adjacent uses and permits:
■ A maximum of 2,200 residential units are permitted as replacement of existing office, retail, and/or industrial uses at a maximum density of 50 units per adjusted gross acre, of which a maximum of 550 units may be developed as infill units.
The General Plan policies for the Airport Area call for the orderly evolution of this area from a single - purpose business park to a mixed -use district with cohesive residential villages integrated within the existing fabric of the office, industrial, retail, and airport -related businesses. The proposed Project is consistent with the MU-H2 land use designation for the project site and would implement the City's General Plan goals and policies for this portion of the Airport Area because it would integrate residential uses into Newport Place.
An analysis of the proposed Project's consistency with the applicable goals and policies of the General Plan is provided in Table 3.10-1, General Plan Consistency Analysis. The analysis concludes that the Project would be consistentwith the applicable goals and policies of the City's General Plan. The Project would not require a General Plan land use amendment. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in significant land use impacts related to relevant Newport Beach General Plan goals and policies, including consistencywith the AELUP for John Wayne Airport. 121 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
3 c
v �
o
Y
-° —
5 �'
a)
+J
U G
L m V)
O Q)
f6
+�
° Q)L fL6 p
Ln p
of Q) Ln Q
h
V) -Z
Q v
VI a) -° +�
Ln
O
v ro Q
m O Z
O
p
Q
T a N f6
N
u v_ c
Q
O c
3 W v v°
Vt >
'tn N QJ �>` �
1 ? V)
C
+O+
rI (E
'p u
Q) a)
L
VI +.• N
u °_ c C
QL O L
L 4.1
V)
hD
V)
V) M a)
++ ro a) VI f6
f6 ++ d C +�
'p 7
N
C
Q) 'U
f6
41 O h
V7
Q) .> Q
m V1 [a L
Q U
Vi
�--+
U f6 it
CU CU
U E Q)
v
i J E O
'� +'
7 U
C Vf H
V
v
Q to
Q ++
_
OU
N C
Z Q)
C Q)
() U ,U
U
m
p 7 U
Q) Co
'+'
Q .� _
3 QL CU N
Q) ++
C C T
_
N�
N a) f0 .CU
V > Z Q
ca t'
v�
CE
T
'O ° Q) d
> O
m }�I N
Z c U L
Q)
Vl O 0-
C
° L
�i Q
QI
m
Qi a v U
CL
s
f6 Q
O m
7 U 0
°
'�
u .:� C
v
°
Q Zn i O
° 'Ln
N a
L
aJ a v
co
v;
H
c v
c
E
_� o
Q)Q) Q) 'T Q
+�� E�
c ++ c
��
a) N
va
V) w
'c
n3 v �� Ln -0
N c c
O
O
'Q)
C �
Q)
� O
N
U
E
N Q
Q1 i L
V7 4 � O
a) 'a
++ V)
'
°
L Q) °
�n
0 O >
= L1 ++ v
N w
L 7
n3 N V)
c
+' _
-
— Q O +� oA
U
+� E
Q N C U
'j '�
W - L
0 m .�
a)
NO
C
i L
v
O
L
o O
C O�
'u
fl_
v
_0a
�
v Q
t, v E
a
s
° +,
p°>
O a) u O L
Q
o
° a)
C
75 v O
, .w E °
O 'X
a)
f 6
O O 'A 3�
2j L -6
O a, = v in
C Q)
O L
?�
O 4- 4-
?� Q) mC
_
m
c O
cu M U X
a)
.�-.I 7
fl C U
a Q)
� +J 6
O
C
U O
v u 3 0�
n c
U+
U L
n
L
v
L p 'E Q1 t n
O v *' v
v O
v ��
*51 C
Q
v ro
O C E
v
'O 7
v O
O N C
E
.0
h
`°
N
a `°
N
a a E
E
N L
0 O a) ~
C) s v
U E V�
In
-°
-° >, v 5-
O
v O Q) - c
L
� a a)
v u O
a1 to U
O
O
j
u
u Q) cv
Q c
W a) L
�
Ln Q) 0 _O
L a)
In
d
'a
N Q)
vi
-°
aN+ w o d
u 0
-p
N p
C
p Q
O_ >T ca > cn
O v c
p_ ra
O
Q a)
O U
Q v
i
p
co Q)
v E in
O-
`n
c
° O Q) u c
O +, .- 0
p p-
O
N
O L Q
O O O Z)
C f� CO
p- v E— o
Q) O H O
Q v
Q) �° Q 3 °
Q
v
Q vv
v 'O L
L
°
Q °; v
N 7 (6 co
Ln C
t +' u C -p
c
L 'n -p N i
H Z
L C
L C QJ
N
L tl.0 O G4 -p
H C
L 7
c
E ra
LJ 7
O �
t6 L
Ln
+,
Q) vi In
C t0 N V)
O
O c -6
C
3 C p
C v u
c
In 0
C C
3 d
. a)
A.,
X
Q)
V/ O N U
•in 3
Vf U L
•uf
V1
•�
fn '++ Q) +'
•h p
Uf V) U L
•in
�_
0)n
v v
C>
RO a) cv U
C a) m
C
•u
C
c
X O Q) Q)
C X
cQ)
E
O v cOL
O v
O
O Q
_0
.NU
O� c
0 nv
cm
ua m
L)
L)
O mQ)
aOL
Q)O�
LnL
0) v
Q)
c
_ v
E .0
>
a > o v
+.+
E v
C
'+.r
U
v C-
c
a
O O +s
v
E w t
vQ) �
O
0 Q)
O p
VicO+
V) In
n iQ)Q)
Q
'p
•
u
O
> a)
ViQ)
=-0 Ev
c
c
O E�
uo
° Q
Q,
-O
w
p c0
Qc)
> Q >
E +.,
,>
t — u c
,c
a) +1
O +� oa
In
'� `6
E
O Q) Q) M CO 0 Q)
° n �
�-+
+' O +''
>
'n () .c
a)
'O ON Q)
v
- 'O .0 , c ++
,n ++ ca
Q) Q) v
a L E
v V c
N} Q) v
aJ c E n
.+�
V; O -°
a) Q c}
Q
E
-C +� L E o O N
n3 o o a u
ut
OL
c
v
E
c 3
N
•�
al
a-+ N
+.� Q
hA c
N C Q)
!0 a) (E >^
vl L
Q 2
E
c U
+-, ra >= '-
'a
c +�-• f0
In c O N L L
m .0
'A 'p
m in
Q t6 O Q
O° ?
v aL+ uLA p
c W n3 v Z v c
O c
c
'O p Q) +�
a
u +�
Q) Q
m
+ v 4
c
o a
o V
E c
w a Q))
o° o v
) ai
c
x Cm
cLv o
Ln
0 O
i
Z
N j N
u p +�, Q
v n Ln
p
E c V
in E E -p
+;
�p
E
Q C p
p
u
t
- w c +'
+,
O
p O
V)i -p
u
L U
° >
+-' O 3
L
° 'O C
4 ,
a)
c -O u t tco
of
>•
++ c
N n3ro
N In ca
4� O
O L
Ut
M�
In
cui2 v
c
M U n3 3 Q)
c
v co
> Ln
C C
y O
c o +�
a
m u °�
Gait
u +� u a
Q v E
.
Ci v V)° p E
U
va
+°
_,7
v
v c
t }' +'
i Qni
v
_ ut Wt
M
C
u'QM
V Ln
m
C Q1 c
V 'L
f6
a I fB +� i0 c
M
u v
f° o
v
n-0
u asi v
In °
v` `6
i
N
O1 n a) c L
O ++ -0
a°
2 p
c
a°�i
L t a)
'a
a
O. O
I�
Q'
>—' w
� c�
•� p
(Oj a a) O
N p
, . ,_ > �,
= c +� v
i ra 3 —
a.. v
Q)
O u �) 3
= c d) ++
f6
V
Q
a) a)
u O m V1
pp
E_
Q) v V) >
C In
Q
O GO O c
(B c L
v v ++ u N
m
= Z
p c +�
L L
p
•C .c iv -O Q) O
3 `
aJ
c
oA c >
v ca
+� L
of a) •� �6
— +�
Q) L
v
c�i +� Q
>
3 co c
t7
'� u
= n v
_ c
o o °°
o o
o
Ln
.v
ri
ar
Q j
� c c
a a, `o
+ E c
a'
Q c
N` E O
O
N
a3i
Oy1 Z v v
3 t
a E +' vi
Vvi U u
M y
E
O O Q) � OA
M O c
M
a)
�n
4+ a)
L-C
OC p j E c
H +' c c
Q c E
Q p O
V '� _Q v Q)
D
Q T
H In O Ov.O
N N
M In
CO 'a 1
O
° v -O Q U E
�0 3
^� v a o`6o E
N E E
N> v o
^i .L
Ta '>
a o E
.p
°U
°U °U
o
°u
J
Z a)
�1 C a) a)
-1 0
-1 -0 C Q
O t�i7
a)
J m .� tail Q
LnE
Y
Q
E
c
v
E
c
O
w
0 c
O
ra
w
L
U
a-
a `� v v
�p
v
E
�
t *us
>
N 'a
p aJ
cu .L
N D N cO
O
a)
H +� v rl C
Z co
laA •U
C
C
Z L 0 a 0
aJ Y s a v
°
E cu
c v
E
^ �j E W
aJ t0 0
p -a
m C
J O .- to C
v
t O U
C ci
M a
't
aJ
J In4-1z d
7 4-10
a Q +J O
C
aJ `� a-.+ a
p L 0
O C O
Q
a
0 0 0 E v L0 -a
m
4-1v
L C
T O ?i
v p
Q- ' j 0 E E 0- c
+� 0' u u
'a
C O O 3 m
N
J v '6
X ON •O
-
v L N a Qj Z
aE O
L� a) L
Nu
OJ
CQ
O aF
O
L O0Q
a v (u
X
aJ
C
C
Ln
c C w Y ra
E +�
O
L ca
—
Q v .a co O N
+�
>
O p a
aJ al Ln
aJ
i v L L C v
tB tB ra
O C U E
aJ ZZ
to
U
+' O° C>
C c a v m
O
C
°'
v
aJ
� 0
Ca
3 °�
v Ln
3 v n p Q O
>u
E
O
a u v C
�mE u
ca
v
va v
�
v �°a u Q 0
°��'�
svt �a >�J
o
Z5 ° o CL
C M N
a)
7 0' Q
n 'F Q C 0 C>.
v
-6 Q C-
C
U
U
o N
N
v
-•
u
t
O
a L,
0 p C a cTo
O v
a
tall
p
+�
aJ
tJ z
-O
U
C
C v a C
Ln u Z3 v 3
V C
aJ > .v
L +� c o o
O
L aJ a
+� v N
ra
m
D-.E
aJ `� C ° C OC
O° U t E • aj
C 4+
— ''
L C v d L
a
v aJ
C > L
n ai
v E
> aj
'� M c v u-0 -A°
-
M= a
v
a
N
N�
c'�o U 'N
C O a
o
O .a -0 v 3
aJ M
t]A u r-I O
CL E t C IE C O T v
C
Ln �' 0 0 Q)
C U Q M V'
-_O v
-a v O (B +' m Q ca C
m
C V L m Ln
=; 6A 7 C C
7 N a Q D ?� O v
° 7 d L C
m y 'o O tv
° n
O a cLv N u>
O
C
u v O
n
) t—,
3 Q
a m aQi v '�
L L C c
° v
m
(n
c
M = v V
C u N aJ
V
aJ O
l6 s
SZ O> W L C} °
O
V aJ v
aJ N
�+ -0
u
LA C 0 LJ
->
_ m (� O n3
-a
E
v
L C '>
a; a L
a v
L U O aJ L
D Q a; 0
s f?
0 3
v C Q
- V, o
aj c v v
"
v-0
ai J a 3 m v,
z
3 v o
t, >
v v
U V O
a
~
_ Q O° v v aJ
= Z OC
tz
Y' Q aJ
•V
> i -
- a_a
7 +. p
++ C V J
v o o C v LLJ
C
N •�
Q
a. O �O = O -°
O
O .� m 7
O °-
i 3
'a
v E O U Q
.Q `'n E a 7 aJ
C +1
" 7
C L C
Ln
qA ,n O
+�'
d ' s
a o
a E E *'
*'' O > Q t6
ca
caa
c
J C v
f v> ui E
+�
—
v, v v
c 'o c
a a
m Qcoy
aJ
o LL, m
U Q Op
c
co
O L V a
sz C o
axi
z m- � u��
C
>bn U_
a
aJ C U •C
L M
v V) v
—
v
}�
°� °�
m
0 3 0
v m� O 4
�
a
~ m
E o
on v
�
V = U aJ
O N
t
L aJ O
O} v .+�
y u t m to — .S '>
+' -a
s D
Q-
r-I Ln
p c aui Z) aJ o
C +•' bra
�
O = f0 -0
� a-+ C
,y aJ p J C aJ
Q C m '7 L
C
aJ -a
U Q J +�+
++ ..°- v, C)
+�+
c'`l +L+
Ln
a U
oO o
m
V E
aJ L
n 3
LJ U
v•Enl
O v
in -a C
Sao
v
O- C •- p O) U
v a
m L1
L
E L v m 'a' v
CL
aJ .E
+� 4-
c •E ro
a
v v w U m
v
o �; °
mo N
U
LO U
a
i CC.O
bn �, u
3 J E
O i
> �p `� i
W
C
Q v +�-' t 0
.0 .�
C O c O_ Q *�''
Q m
p
'a aJ J Q u ,n
A
,u
v OL
> aJ
O r! p -v,
a N ty C= +�
,y
W v v v v°
f0
O
a
o
— u v,
L M `t aJ
�O
C L Q O U v,
Q
�O
aJ
04 :� .+� Q
c
o
o v .�
v o v L
C O 'Ln aJ u
.E
tin on
aJ
>.
3 u—
>+1 aJ v >
?— c E O
c3 =43-
C aJ
67 c
z
m m Q.
a
O C V -a •�
a •o c aJ
tL0 a O L 'a
Q o
U
n
tall N >,
a' u o aj N�
N
4-
a
C
v a t�
C
_0
L1 v N L
O
uaCi
d
ai
i=.. c U n C p
v
C SZ
L
° -
a�i ai
o .= o
3 l7 aCi ao
v 'v
u ?
a C °
o o
o
E J
G
aui a
0 o
N
i v,
-C aJ . +J
u U
c3, +--1 p .� p
C N
m
3 -a
J E a s
O +'
aJ fLA
N
N
m > N
C v,
v v v
O aJ t> f0
+� > J v aJ +�
C
pp
v
U N
Q v v
t]A
r
L
Q U Q' f6 E •U
r+ N
CJ
O�
t]A vi C
d
C. Gl
M 3 >
.aJ
H i 0
a
v, Q_0 t0 `,
-a t9 L_
L1
U
v .�
U'
a
i
Q
m v
C vi v n
C -a N O
�� Q
L
E O
C C m 0 O
C +J a
4.. L 41 >�
_v cd v� N
Ol m M 0-- w�
a
3 °a o
E E v c
ti°'o v°
a o v
f2
i.. : i " v,
_ m E t]p S C u
C
U m L u aJ
C ° Q 0
W 0 U
m t
to 0 v oA
ri
y
Z 3 '� a
C -a tB
•a .O
v C C d -O 4O
L
'a
t
_C + O cu
+m w
o° ca
O. O
aJ ,
0 aJ
O ca
'Q C 3 v
3 ca O
0 o v
a
E caa
L. Q
a aA
a
cn
O O acJJ
to v,
ni O� L •E
U
O l iLU c
co -a
'v,
J U
t O O
�'1 M
m
— a
M > •+L+ C Q X
_
n1 f Q- C " � �0_.0
f6
�' L u aai tM CL v
co
n ra OL
aJ n 0 O O
= te a c° LO o N
O ^
tw
s v� to
H
vUi
-a , Q- CL
J ++ tB Q d aH U
m Q
Ln ,
O d
M
Y
Q
E
(U
E
C
O
LU
0 c
O
m
w
u
a) �
m c -0
r
O
6 .�
L
p
O O O N
+ *' N
0 :t
d
L U O
+'
0 a)~
3 ma o 46
C
C
Oa
•y
+_
v cL0
N h0
U N
•C
2 a) t
Ln L a, c
>
a)co
++
++
a)>
O L
s 7
O> a) a) •— U
O L
fa
m
L
CL
Om
J
v .0
0 ut *�'
O
U M
3 c E
a)
4�O
E
41 v v
E
U o a o a a t
Orn v
'"
(U
w
cu
a)
Q a)
L C _
OL m
L O t to •—
fE 0 a+ —
+� -6 u
x a)
•L
m
mo
a1 C >
U
ry•) S
Mj 3
m
a � O
L L
m �O
N E
7 W
O >. C:M
al
m
> f6
^ f6 t
C
a)a1
�'
p �O
3 AA
bo
ai
°
'�
m 0 N E CO
V U Q 0' U
CL
0 „�
C
c
-�'
o
w tw
o u c
a, c a
.v o°
o
3 ti 3
o
E
a)
N 2
O
[a u v .� O U>
°
a 4J
a v Q
a
Z
v L ++
a c
U
+L
> a
x E t
U Q)
au)
y—
L v,
Qa)
aco CU v o-0� o
a~ o"� a)m
E a
O
Q
7 O
N > > a) (6 W [0
L4 0� E
a)
L a)
d
E
•�
U z
LO
Q N pT,p -O
4-1
U a1
w ��., H
Q
E
O
T
2 c
o
O v m 'a 4) tca
+, ao v c E
m T O Q
c v U v
a)
s
UCq C v
v a)
O
_
bZ
a
u C U
a) 3 �' w y
O o Q m
i+
� U'
v
co N U p
E
O ) c °° a)
4- a) Q N
L
al
ar
O Q
O
+,
cTi ,,
c
.a' c
( Q O M
ca ao p E
C p— L, 6—
0) c s u
N 3 +� '—
E
2 Q +�
L
C
E
a,
v a a,
°�° +�
E c t
o
w a
�O
v
v
O
O- > a)
L
O U Ln m o
,s
�
� Z O
E (u+T
aj r s
a) O 7� t
tw
,,,
— C v L
.°
v L C
•�
C
a,
o ac)
E ° 3
`6
Ln
a) Q
�,
U o
C
v ,u 0
L U '}
C)m�,
+' +'
bA
o
C +�
E
ro Q
i
�, 'T v o
O i
Q
n
v
V) om
t Q� E
F-
U U
w p — a)
U
Q E +� ObuO
Q
v
:� E
c=
••
�' 'E � t
.. �' v w 0
3 .� a
a)
to
C p_0
C
Ctao p *'
C L '—
C
u
L
N
L vl Q l0 C
a) t
L
t
°0 t
Ln
C �, ao
r_ LA v u
_
= C .0 t T E L E
C 4� n3 —
V
C c a)
v U
v
Ln
O f6 v
U E t
O x ca L x
u a) E aJ
0 o 'a 'a +' O m
u u m m U u a
O O C a) u
u c ca m�
aJ
O m +�
U aC N
L
ra t
O
ns
_
}
3 +, 3
L
a,
� �, U
� Q m
} v
() Z
x
�
a
a)
Q
O 3 3 O
Cul > E
v C
O 00
u ro t
t
O^
a)
O
'n
to
O C
n3 >
O v�
+�
u O
c Q
=
n L v
N w
a 0
Q a)
3 +w
> s s �'
UO C
c+a ° E 3
i
o m o
0 cv
O in u 7 a) >
a)
O +� a) Z
>
a cv
fE
ra
'^
C
a) o L mO m
C
_
E
'O
i
ra L
C
p
n
a)
•T
Lu -0 Q +' L
Wp O
O
a) O
E L
fa
�0-
Vf
M y
v Ln v
{n
�
c M 4� C aJ
s •�
u �; v, v
to :n
Co41
p
'p
— L
a•••
`° E m ca v
O a) bA
ao L p
Q
U v a, v
Q a••. .�
C
c C
a
N
L
(6
C Q
C
i L
O OL '�
v .V U
U
N O CL
f�6 Q
C
O
u
.L �T+
O
3 c
a)
V aci
L V7
bD
>
s
E
i
Z
ra L
ra
L
ca
++ O tH Q
a) p O +� O
O
O c C
L L
= p N
NO
iJ
aJ
(�
E a) �
CO
aJ
O p
n
vi
a= Ln
'� U v vi a
C
coo p O
+� 7
$~
`�
0 Vf
•Vf
(7
c a)
u
.L
L
' -�
`^ +� v
a) a) 7 7
+� ra
ra C
$ U +'
a1
O
i O
u a)
Q
++ C
fa
a)
a
+J
�' 3 .L
of
T +N
a)
L p
4 Q— ra
O
+�
O
v a
a
a, 0
v t
c
H 0 CL
++
s m
v
U
L=
u
o c Q v
o =_
7 Q, z 3
`L° E O
� a) +'
= to t
y O
O u
f0
`—' C
•Q
a) 6
0 co ro
= 7 Q) aJ L
a> > v
v v,
H
a
L
E Ln
•0 M
�=.i
a)
S
L
a
Vf i
O
= +.. l6 Q '�
= Q
O a-.+ V)
C fa
2 C O
aJ
i
.i
Oi u
W a s —
a1 4j—
U i
U .'—n m N a)
aJ
°A
Q n
O � °; O
•c c
'v0—i
a) cu.>
'n
(g
a)
`n
v
v
c
o c>a ao W '� M
�.. v
= a)
+� V)
E o u
rca
a) T
aJ
C to .E
OI
z
O
aa)
Q
v
rl
C
C
O
O
vui ca
.Q
O;
•Wp >
N
N N
LA v
ll1
C
V
a) c N O�
Q
Q a) LJ m n
E
9 -
kO c
M
C
ti a) O
N bA --+ - m M
M a) N
H vi a}L)
.� M ra
J a)
J O
�O C
(C �^ U tlbl Z .� Q-
C M
ao
�1 i Q a)
+J
J •C
4ml C
O
Z
ra 72
>
H �°
ui Q Q'' E
v
cc > = v
a •O
o
(7 a)
J ma C
J� U E .� 3
J .=
J dAEb
(7 N
J 7
N E
o w
a
O m
O d
M
C
p
a)
c a) H a) p
N N
Q
bn
a) -a '}
c aJ a)
C p
O a) -a C
- E- v -a O
rE C T
bn v L
C
Y
> L
v v
G s
(v rn~ v
a) V
N
Q
M L
V
p 0
W u L
a) bn O— +,, Q
a 'a O
a)
— 7
� Q
_
0 C L ra C
U L
+'
a) O a) O
� C
>
'in •�
E Q
T O
.�',
,n
a) bA _Q +,
C
L
O O O a) p-
to a "
Z
a) ._
c (u Ln
L
N
LU
_
u
—
-0v �,
V
aj
sw
2} O .- a)
�' ^ c s�
:+U O c
" a)
J
O O c
o m a L
Q+ ra a)
°'
t p-C a) u
a) a
Y
ra
ro
O
L O O
x
a) +, -a +, L
+L,
�,
bn O
o ra C
a)
+, v� m,� t
o L
a)
O
w
},+�, E
7 c +�, +, .N
C
c O
N
W z
to U
� O O p
a) ^
a L 0 0
o
'3
O Q -p
ro
C
l0
bn
E v v N
41 ra Ln
-aQ
+�5. a)
c 3 a)
a)
E
fO
p
O a) L CO
p ,v ''A a)
L
O
� a wM
a Z ra �,
U E>
N E C
to
x a�
a) C D
Q a) V ^ T
-p c
ai
ra v
o E c o
_
C 3 oU
C
C o v
ba '�
Z
E
r>'a
'� p ra —
a) v, a)
, r1
a) c c
E
+� c 4 '
'
rn
bn
OU
o p U 3 ra �
u a
0 o
o
aci c
Q
o
u
'c
�_
o rTa +m
c v �
a)
O p
L o
C
ra
J
ra p u a)
Q 3 i -a
V
Q ca C
�+
V�_
o
c v
o >
v �
L
U
ra ,,,
bn 1'n +�
-o a i=, 5 E
rB In C
a1
p—
ra C
+� 7 tl N O to
.�--' In 7
`^ N O
Ln
N
p
E a
o o
N cu E
p
a)
c c 3
a
Ln
c
E
d
N0
ca 3 c (°�
Y v
O
a -a v N
=_0 L o x
oc
v cLra
-0++-,+
c�cu7
x
N
rn ca
a > O ; V)
'6 Q-'O
O a)
to E
?
O C) U
, +,
v-1 o
+,°
a) O
�Q-
O
a
QO
O
CE
-0V>
a NC
a O
—0
a
f
E
'
a
•>N
OU
LQNQ— L
�
+�
E4O
U a)
x
O
C
L`^
a
O
Q
-p O O N
r
QL7
i
CV
In
O
U a)
a)
U
'd N
Os
L
ca v°
E> u O m
Ln a) °�'
o
o
Y o +�L' c
° u 3
E L
d O L — �
d 7n
V
d L L
Q
Ol ate-,
.�
a) a) cQ U
a) Y a)
a)
a) Q d W
a) p a) 3-0
l0 L
t> N O O
p a) +,
a)
N
C C L
to O
CI-
p_
Op v
0 Z)
r E
m
>in
0 C) J
a
+p,>
N v-a
vOL
ca)
> w
rn E vv
�u aJ>-ao
c
-
C
c )
'Oa
c E aC
O
c (, n o�
c
m0
°o
UQ °
a
U m ac a--0 Q
U u a
V) a
N
a) T
—
V)
v
a)
-a
C
a)
a
in
a)
L aJ +�
ra
a
bA
L C ra +,
O () o
O bn
c +' a) C
L
v
1 C
a' �
Lz
C
C ++ d
O m
E v 7 c N •+,
Q � �
c
p
+O +O
p L bn
a ra C
+,
C
a)
a)
v w
C a) a)
V> ra +, +�
v Q ra (n
L O
O O L C E Q X
v bn ra v v
C
C Q +,
ra L
�
L c
+, t� a)
� r- V ra
+, rLa I� O
> Y V
a) L +, Ln ra C O
V
a)
ate)
0 ++ O >
yr
L
C a) i Q
a)
O v Q a) U
3 .Y
= +' c
0 1
'a ca
a) o Q n
t
Q
a) T
a) E
O
•� 'a ra
O >T N Vl
a) � L +, N L
v
C
a>i (�—�
e ro a) o
N
° rco bn
> t LL Ern
u� a)
u
v
E
ro
i o
a
v
;. v
5 „� •r6 c
-0 o c a)
E v an
a) M H
-aunvoL
z
o
O
E
r
O
v
Q
_0o
W
4-
Q
V
V
VLn
_
LU
)
„
�> QJ
fn aNL)aa
a)
rn
W E
a Q L V
0 o
O
a L
—^cQ)
�
� o�N C
U
C
E
Q a
OC a) .� L L
L a) Q +� C
O
a) a
=
— rO
ear • V i-•' rO _a
E
in L C
L> �-,
ro
eO� L C
CL'T
H cu 0
O
O C t y
:=_ tO M N C
=
a E=�
u a,
`n
'a L
L O
� ra E v
c CL O p
u
N
� N bn —
a)
.Q 'v L a o
a:. a) C U
v—
a L
d
Q °'
`° c
�° a,
O°° n a)
W
� c
L
a v v r° (n
e bn c o
i
Q
Q
a) [6 > Q
'a
to U (a Q
a, ate-+ W U—
a w CO C a)
a, >
X
c 0
0 a� c
a E ° v
i
Wbn
L
= O
L
i is Q s
E
aJ _N v V
72 'a
C a- J
3 LL c
a. a a)
a)° +�
c N
m
a1 C m O
�_
aj —
O a) tpo
C Z
$ IS c O u
v O
� �`1 El� E O
Q) +, L
!�.
_ +, L +,
O W
rn N a) W x
'E
o
N W -a C O
'�
� (6
a C -a C
a)
=
ra j-, Q m
Q
'a +�, p[ Q
C O c
O_ct
`1
v>
u
ra v E
to
�, c v
`� E co E
E ra p
M L; o
a) as
f
M
u
crr r+o
+�
v Q- p C
v
c)
LA +�, C
LA 0• n C �o
u1 a on O C> N
U +,
N +,
'n +�, O a)
J c
ti O V O
ti C C O
ti E .0 la i -a
Q
Q p
vi
(o .�
C ra a) -0
a a) > > n
ra
as t
a) L •L
> +, >
lC O E VI
kO 'x a u Y v
H
7 O Q 'a v
U'
'a -a
Q 0 0
E t o 0_ C
m ca
-j
a)
a)
Zj .c
Ln
C) d
m
00 N a)
4 , —
11aj Ln
v
a)co •c
« 4-
O o U "6 +CU tlA
O� O
N U N
v
c
N .� M C N C
O
a° v
lu
v C LQ LQ a-° .0 p 3
OU
O> N "6 ' C
Z Z v c u
-a C
— O O Q— v C
v m >,
N
m .— Q 0 Q CL T
L
}+
C
a) N s+(6+
.0
M
E�v am
N
O c -L
> a)
U }Na)+ v
-0 s -°
c� v c o v E
v s O
.v
to ^� pp O N N
I� O L +
E a) v c«
Q 5 v
a v +, -6 .� d v C c
v 3 j � v v
� o o v
o N s v c E
v0
v
d �-+ a)
E
v
L U > 6 v^ �_ a) Q
U C
+'
3 s
aa)v ) a) a) O +' v
E
v Ln L
M O O_ m
L Q L ns I �^ > E
'a +'
Q •�
a) a'
v v p Q v
m
N
I
Oo U= L C N
Q O v� J v O OL
to
+J v v
3�°
Q^1 0-s-a
Ln-
s
n
> 3 v
U +� m ,� ro
o�c3o00
C
c
o>Eocvc
T� o+' as v
pm
- m �Ln.o c Es
o
v a) Q)E
o v, +- —1 > +, o o
c
O v M U v o
.+� on ° .N x °°
a)o
E p m Q >
C L J Q c o E
O
Q
O
d
pE 'O v
>
c ti 2 UbD LA �
Q)
a�
m Q s a
-aO
-
.�c
o o '3 � N 0 E
v
c v
.Ln
a)s-p �u E
s
v a) v s a)
a s - U L o
�_ 'd -a > +� v +� c
, a) -0 a) E o v.--o`-° E Q
7 tv.) tw o O
C
v o O O OL 0
(B a1 7
In
QM)N v O 'u
v t ^ 4 > M v
Q)
0 U N a) C Q .0
d v c-I (B � m i E N
d
v v Q v 'O E
a) L 4b 3 v v E I
m
zQ��3:Cai
mQ-0 Q)C
O O� v C U
m ri ° O
H Q) J p +N+ pp 3 , L O
C V tCo C -O 7>
v N C '� O
v L .— N p� u a) QD
a)
4. j s .+- C'
•C
' C- d ^ Y N yam_, w o
•iW
T
•C
Ln N C C �
4' C SLE (a
CA
o 0 v v
U O E a 'a O
o C am v v v u—
u 7 r» _ 'O L M> N
o
U
+,
m
p
L
N Q)
+' C-
,� L
O +�—, m O s
C '6
N
7 +N+ L1 s
�,' C
o
m � m N -a
'O C +�,
v 0 C
L N L T v • a)
E t c- o
"
� o a) v v a
ca `� ca
v
+, a o Q Q
E c 7
ai
a) E tia v E E
c v v +� E O N
• C Q
v
E '� ,U — C
C>
O N C—j
a) U m
+' +'
_N L p
`° s tf L °)
CO
N
c s � Q
L2 O Q
u
c
cr -0 " 'A
�
� a 0-v LA �
+' O
a)
a) C
°°
L
N p T v
C>�bn
Q��
o
E U
N�W3vbn>v
+� +�
Q
3 Qt �� v v
3 E °
a.0 u 4 'ao�
o °'� �
Lco
L Lw
''
o
(a +� C C O N
�,,, U O 'a
C
Z
L •� s co •
—_ C v
a
~ O ,F -p v Ln
_> Q) v Fu s x a)
++
p O
O v i Q v
E +'
O L v v O �a
aJ O L a C NE Ln
to
N
41 C
X u E u m
4) on v
.� v v w s N
a m
0 v o o v E
f6
v- 0 O v
g
c N c *' w o N
v o v° t O
v c Q
L
= aci ° E C >
�. -I > s L C
i
L
O— C O 0'
S
� 0 M +-' 'O a) W
0 .m p a)
u v
L M Ln
•a p o
O E v C � '� C
Cl -a L L -6 C v
i
v s O Ln C
a U
�, O 6
v v N v L
E c
aci O o v°
a) U�
�n E L .X ca
O
v" a�
Q m v E c 0
a
E E �v
cvQ=MaU
m
�v
v E
o�CL—Mo
-
ya)v 3U0}T
c
= s ° E
Q
p
= aU) bn
a)
+� v v n
aNi
o co v a°) 0 m 0
_
L s v °
V O> m v
aJ O E i
++ Q- m m �_ a
rl
v �•' a) E O D .N
N c N
a1 — p
N> s m
ra N
� L L ++ E v
Q a) a) O c 0>
N N s ++ v N 7
O
v E +� ns ao
E c
H L N
to O
a> X s v U�
O ra E U
c I_^ v w v � a)
oo t E -0
o
O> L
u1
v s
v1 v
n c N
~ Q)
M
y
Ga Q
0 v C v m
C
" a) to
> v v O O p
ti U s — +
O
ti v— L
N—+�
v U Q
7> N 3 Y c
L
1p .N v
tC � m— c v N E
O an v oA v v M
tD +1 ca
v
v v p ma p
_ c dA
+� a> v p
Q N N s C N V1 L
> v x�
_ v
Q t.11 — a) 1 a) >
E >M
L = Q Ci +�
J L M LL
J C 0 m- i Q
J >
N E
r6
o w
V 0
O] �
O M
C) a
M
c-I N
+•T � =
u O —
c
N
N
O
.O
O O O
N
0.O
O
•� N
-6 = +a�J
r6
O u
0 rua
C
O 41 �1
c +� N
ro
ro u a)
to a1 i Q O
C
O
ti0
-0
i
O
C a+ N OJ O
+
v
C O
L r6 ro
c+ L
N C a
O M
.�
E
41 aJ C
-0 t; O
UV)
+� C
_ Q
° L O
7 a1 +'
'V
n
aJ -0 O-
O
O OJ
O u N
E
cC6
In
Q Q tv
rB +-' N
OZ
co Q
N a1
L7 aJ
++ C
bO
aJ
�
No
rB
s
O °
aJ r6
+�_•• N
+'
a
ra v
U aJ
CJ r6
v U r6
C
a)
C
> aJ o •L
In Y O Ln
}+ L +•• Ito -1
(6
r6
O
In Q
Y O C
0 O
p
O N v
In J Q ,V Q
r6
C i"
O }'
L rn E O
V rB iZ
aJ Q
E
L
T
L
3 Q
- L
C
O (Qj C i
O O
C
Q u N Y
aJ r6
'p^ r6 a
J
Q eO O
O
v N r6
3 N n
v
lU6
In aJ aJ L O
v> E
U h�0
O
>
•T
LO
v
H O
O v aJ
Q
'N N
N
Q
N p Q-
Q
N
N
.-
'N
aJ Ln Q
-� a1
rB a1 3
Q O 'L twLn
U u a1
vi
7 O
rn O1 U v
Q O
t6 aJ C
++
p
> -t ra
_0 a1
C
4J r6 a- y
aJ
bA
L u +� +�
� > aJ
t
r6
3 O OJ aL
O
O C
'�
C
m aJ
i
+j O1 -O
r6 r^ p
= Q .ri-7
`1 +'
bb0
C
O
Q o +-%
N O1 Q
x +'
-6 0A N
C C > L
Q—
rn
v
E
N
aJ 3 C
+' EO OL
_0
L v
Q
E
N N E
O
3 r6 'Q � °' °'
-a C
O
T p
OO i1
E
O
+' U
aJ
aJ +-+
>
aJ aJ
U
T r j l6
Q
rn
C
+_� L +••
U
N OJ
OU
� QJ
L! cu
V
C
-a
u Gi O
-
= ai
Q dO u N
E C� r6 V
SZ
O
O
uy�
�O aJ
aJ I u
L +�., C
aJ C N U
f°
. N
aJ Q +' C_
O
C m Q
'3 p
O C Q_
tm
V
O
v p E
aJ
2 Q C M
Q
N
O� E
U r6 QJ
T—
GC0
U— m rS E
N
y_ Q
L
N
O
0 co C aJ
o
Q
•W
OL 00
U l6 '� 'in
aJ ra lD u
C
v
— C
-0 'U 3
-0 C OJ
O
N' n O
t Q
3 a)
rua
O t6 �_
> GO
�_ N u ra
N
a
O iO
a, a, I}
v U
L
N Y oN a
E
rO
+�
v
3 E>
_
v C
p L C i
N r6
'a
C
3 L a
C O
U r6 °_ }
aJ L
L f° N v aJ
Q-
ra
C
+•• aJ +•.
U V
N In
+•�
C—= aJ
aJ C
6 V L aJ
aJ v L E
L
ro
r6 aJ
r6 Ln +�
Q +�
V
O
rl
OL N
a-+ }, a }, E
1n C L
Ln O is
U ^ ro
+�
+�
h0 p N
+N� O
U U
C 3
aJ
E
aJ
+� Q
O
W aJ o
r6 �
p O (> >_
N
aJ u
N L O
r6 .E N O
Q -O O
N
r6 C 00 •N a
OT
3 O
p
- o v
° E t0
Q
v
Y
C `
O P O
v
LJ
y~
cNJ
o
3 bn
E
cu n
c Q"
m c v o
C
+�
N
+�
aJ
�; a
O
0)
C
aJ
N r6
p .� rp
�
E oi
++ r6 (6
a)Y Q
0 N
p
7 Q vi
E cL p(
aJ >
p Y= r6
c Q rZ s
p m E aJ +�
m
a°
rLn a
O v `-'
aJ
n
o
ai
Q ai
a 0
C
.L°
cu r6 Ln
° 3 aJ
E o �
v
> 0 3 �°
-C ° o
t o '� aj
to
~�
c > c
aJ o o
-0 v
.�
v n
u
.� 3
v r'
3 C
°o Ln v
c u u °
E E E
c--O
O a
+-+
O
o f
c C
ra
Ln
aJ L L
�J J
.=
O O aj
L
aJ ++ r6
N
.i
U O
� C +� O
r6
•r
r++_n >' OL +L+ a)
'L 0LA C
a
.>
6 U
> S p>
+, L
U
aJ C> (6
'a
d rN0 r6
a aJ aJ L L O
O
O aJ O
Q1 aJ — N
O
° O aJ Q
O C N C
O C
L
U L d
L l6
4 Q
U
+, U-0 N
U r6 i r6
U W + v7 r6
Q
0 0
v
0 0
E
Y v
3 E +� �_ 'o.o
v ra
> o E
'N
L L
° C v >
E
3 L
C
C Q
-
C-0
+�
v E
o C
L ry
Q
o v
l6 n
aJ u_
N C 'a
� aJ
s L
i L +�
to O aJ m
3 C
ra
L_0 C
N
O
rn
7 L
v� tn'
aJ O
> 0 O O
N
•}, aJ
C -O
V .— = aJ
x aJ 0-
Q c
O,
,
E
O O
w o L
+,
aJ
C aJ
O
aJ aJ
aJ N
v E aJ
E
aJ E aJ
-CaJ
C aJ +-�
L
aJ
t �+ a1 -p
+•• V N ,_
r6
C 0
O
aJ
L
Q
5 -0-
N OJ
a)
r6 t
++ V N U t +-
++
O
X
aJ •L
r6 vi r6
N r6 n
u a)
aJ
to Co
Ln
aJ
L a
UA 3
[6
L E aJ
L
r6 aJ H -O
'a aJ N L
•� m C
°
O O
u m
v c O
'� E
vi
t
U IA
tv al
O
T u ai
dJ
c Y OJ
C }, L ++
p -a > aJ �
E '7) O> p
OJ
—_
r6
O aJ V
c d
C
L
u
can) aJ
O v�
+•. aJ
r6 U C
6 L L _ Q aJ
}
aJ
-0
+'
E
c6 C
aJ Q' N
aJ Q +
E L C aJ
N
> Q N
'N 0 [2
41 a-+
r6
O
N aJ
aJ L
aJ v.
O to N
o
E
cu
N
OL °O
O
C
C
U
Q
L
aT,
f6
i d
r6 L
Q O
U '� r0
U aJ f6
r6
'�
u U
aJ v7 .S �
O
i
Q
O
C.—
_ C
O O
pp Q E
L
rp O C Q
M
X L aJ
4)
E-a
N 4J aJ
-O
T� Q ,
QJ
O
LE
r�6 U
N
Ln O 0 u
m
� U S
aJ
m
Y vi
Q L
O
O T '++
O
cu C:U
Ln fl
v
N
(J
O
+lu
t�6
C
N
O
Ln
O v 00
n
� aJ
O
Ln N
'+O—+ O
+�
+. n rn aJ hA
.N
�.
o?
a��j U
0 a Q oao
•L
c
OJ
L
O Q
as ° O C
C
ai
a+ f0
r6 C
L Q N �'
= r6 = N
aJ
0O O
E
� aJ
i
ai
O
y a
- Y
n c6 v
E v v v v
v
v v v
a
T eA
v°
c
00 _ i
L —
L
U
_
7 a
OL x L1
ro
L
U
O ate-+
Q aJ
N +�•'
O aJ L aJ r6
O In O N N
r6 of
Y O
y
Cs
N C C
,G a1
a1 r6
j aJ
N
p 5 E 6
i
N
a
+; o u
Y
a E a) v
a
v E
e In E
�' a, v E v
a
cu a`6J
y o c
�°
.L
a+,, U =
LI
U
o
o o
�, o
o C
o
'a +'
a,
° r6 a,
N
a,
f6
+,
aJ o
a
f6 a,
a, '� Q
a a � .O .�
a-0.
Z 3 T
u o +, Y L-
>—
C u
-6 0
6 v° o r6 C
t7
a rC6
a',
v o V
Q >, ° a Q-
U-ri
O
L
>. °
y O OU
N
°
.�°—
�w -0
`1
o
; = 3 >
CCU o
Q'
0 rT6 a°J
3 o u
m a`ai
to � t Q
�
L
E
p r6
L of
E aJ L
C
C 3 E
aJ
�'1
C
r6 L
N r6 E
N
N N L
M
u1 O E
L L aJ 3
Q- OA L
f2 .vi
Q O aJ O
O
L
O O
N O rn
W;
O C
I
L6 3 aJ
vi vi 7
u1 aJ c C- }' O
t6
N
`y O
E C ra
+�
SZ U ai i
`�
O
C In
rl
N aJ
aJ
"I O
ty > O E C N
V
L
(� U
aJ
•=' \
aJ Q
> O '°A
r6
a) +•• N rn
E +� a
V
+••
O
(� O ,�_
t� V N
aJ
C
f6
aJ
C
X L rT6
o E-a
f�6
aJ w L OJ
a C
L
Q
0A L
'L a
.7
aJ OJ a1
a C
+�
L
3 0
= V C V N
N
+�
c6 aJ
.E —
to
J
L
�,
�, c6 c6 l6 +�
M
N E
r6
L Qf
0 N
N
4� 4m� ° aJ
O
m
m
a)
anwr.�
Q oA
LCN
•
_
L.0
NN
X Q
° t E v
[6
c-I
c 3 6
N
+�
N
�O
-C
C O
C
( O *'
ao 3, �
Fo
3 cu bz
4�
O -a
a c
t a, o
> O +'
co C E ,N
O
V
v
u L
OL O
a O
z a, v 4�— aJ
L aJ E
N
ru
*'
c
3 on
,tn
� V
aj O
O
0 u
Q
O 0
+� +, aJ u
E
v
+�
3 o
E Z
O> U
E
C
CU
O 6
N -0 t aJ °-
u
u
>
aJ U 4'
c
= o v•o�
0 3
E
�O
o
°�'
3 °a a
o
0 v
^
z tea, oLa
o
,�
o c-
E
° aJ
u
o� a i
a', v
-0 L Q
O O
O
o 7 aJ Q N�
E
ns aJ
U N
Ln
Otaj
aJ N
-;°
[CII6
Oa) a
U
O
O
N C
J
�°
NM
U
'
'o�v
Q
N
_
-° v
C���
N
O
>
U ma
u
aa
JQ>
m Q aJ
O
N
�
O
c
M aJ C
N
cO
v O
T+�_
aoJ
_0 O
aJ
a
J
-
v >Tm
c
ai
L.L
Ln
m O ai %`
N=4� L a-' C
C
7 u
L (U
a L
L (B
a a,
+,
c
•Eto
L
L
} m
m N ° V) M
O_
N
�c
U
i m Qd U
a C •}
J
°
O
aJ
0 'N
0 _
LLvw °
O
0 QEE
u
-0 O
o+NCUa
aJ -0 O
m
aJ
N
aJ }'
aJ N >�
L
aJ
H C
OC
-CH
O
-CH•
-C°
LLf0
F+ dOL
, JviH
C 73� m u
to
;
s pi
C ° E
N
L0
J
•+
~i
`n O a Z
�
a)
cu
�'
C)
CU
C ° W
u
i
N 3 v
w
CA Q 3 w V) L U
N
H
Ln N
H
Ln Y
IA -° aJ °
o
Ln oc >
m
2 (v
O
O L C N N
u n m t °
T
,�
O C
u
O
U E
O v
U L u
O C
u o
uo
v
Ln
W
m
aJ aJ
+�
E
° O L
aJ Q Q
L
GOo
cn
O
N
c
U to aJ m
N
�
3 L O
aJ Q
T
a1
oE
aJi
o
ra O
'
O u
aj a,
L°J
E
O t
tO
U
-O -O
aJLON 'O
^
4-
Ln>
vvTL
a
dJ
o
n
°
°
aJ
U N
a
mc
-°
v
E +-
m
v +�
N w
aJ
a o v E 3
L
L 'a
0 aJ
L
0 U n3 m o w E
t
u Ln
� U
'u
N
O O
O a1
X v
U (0 ° '+' O aJ
N
,�+
u
�, m
L
aJ
aJ a,
Q
v)
L
N O
E
L 4
C
E ro
m
C E o
m
°
tj ca O m
Q
>
+ O
aJ ra
t
O O C C
0Cp
d
C >'
O
Q
-6
'� a1
Q
E
C
O
vi
aJ O +� Q
U
ct:
C
t
..0 l0
+� C +� Q
v
�
3'M
Z,�
c U
o v
'
M 3
C +�
o v
a
v v E °
v
i
Z fp
m N
L1 aJ +� +�+
qA O
E �
Q O
O
6 Q:-0 m aJ
N
� O
u�
N N 3
o
E
E
Q E
°
a
.0
� aJ m e co
'_^
Vf
>
Zw, C
N c�
co —
v M v u
an C C C
O
U
X o
a1 —
E
aJ O
c
M a",
u
+�.+
N ao C
01 N ° N O ca
C
U m
L
W m
� i
> u
N
O
,+. aJ l>6 .v O >T
a
o
fa
L
m V, vi
E aJ N
_ }.• U U
.Q
C
°
.Y I
(1a }.,
C
N aN+
+•+
i" -O C Q U
U (0 L Ql
u a�
o
to a J U
.:� CO w
-0
nz 3
o
aJ
v
co
�
Q m +�
o
N
° ,
,,
L E
E
C
o C ra
i
Q
U
Lf1�
Q (B 'a
-O
>T
N a1
a1 C
> °
a1
W
°
m
Q�j �J C (0 aU+
O LJ U a
ro
C C
_
U aJ 'C
L
C
aJ
of
L L Li
m
on
c L L
aJ aJ
U
Q v
+� on v
a>i
ar
'+
O Q in t c w
4' aJ to E u
Lir
O N m
O O >O
+,
O
c
n3
v L
tw X
v C
to •N 4'
3 aa)
i
3 C
v .°A
C N t
aJ
aJ c aJ
^
a —
3 v
v
n3
m v
(a = >'
ai
O
v
v E o `� +�
0 o t °c •3
ri
o=
Q c M
E=
a
o
°°
o°
L(
n
3 ~
C
�-i
> i U
4' N 7
Ch aJ O J 0
N +� Q ,}
U
W
u v-0
u aJ
O L .>
3 Q 'U
OC
I
N
0 O ra U
OJ N N 'a=+ L C
aJ aJ (O ++
evf
+'
m
X N N
aJ C W
W
N
LU °
m t
W 7 aJ
+ u
L N
a aJ
•O
z > a,
'a
3 4' '^ C
C
in
=
rl aj
N a1
-0
M E •�
=
7 O aJ .L
Y v m
� v'�
3 N o °
N a n
N E
N
m
^' 3 o o o
H
3 +' t
N }�
O L C C
—1 U m W
O
S
I1O
V
w 0
S m t
C N
= ro m
O C
= U m
2 I1O1
V
aJ w w L v u
= L L Q L m
Ln E
Y
l)
CQ
E
Y
(U
E
c
2 w
O
c
O
ra
w
C
O
In a)bn
O
O0 U
N
L C C
-0 }, O - a) a)
3 t6 3
aT+
U I
Q- 7 Q
a) t _p
+�
to
6 a)
O
u O
•qp
O N O `n
+L+
U (n 'O
Q
L va)i
O > a)
Ln
? O a)tea
v 0 0
U to
E p
N Q)
7 0 Y
i L C
O to aL+
4� C
N
c c
O
a1 0
S
C
O-C
ma)
C C
f6 }, a) U
C Q L
N
N
tV
3•0�
>•-4-
C
3 -0 c a
OC
aH u L
•L a! a)
E �_ co l0
tf
f6
l0
l0
to
L C a1 a)
(�
'a a) in
�N
+� CoQ O bn
O
O
O
L U a� .c
N v
a) N
chi
U
0 C7
0 (7
0 �, �_
�
0 0 O-
L v v U ._ 3
aL)
N
v0
CO
3 cu
a L '0 n� °'
L
•0
N
N
N
a) O >•
C ��,, O
L CLO a1 C
2>
2 2
T
in
a) Q)-0
�' Co a) +�.+ 'C
N v s M L
Uy
U
U
U
C O a
a U
O Q)�
� >• •C O
tJ
>
�.� C
=
O
O
d
a
L
a
L
a
L
a) to
Q 3: O +=
p
Ln
v) 0- C +,
O In aI
O
O
o
-O Z in
E p CCO
v a) E c
In
In
In
-6 O a)_
_0 >` •L
(6 z },
Ln
>
in
>•
en
>•
L a) U
v�i
tE a)
> a1
>. _ c
v O Q C O
ra
to
to
to +L+ a)
O
O c
tca
O>-N _ t
+' O �' ri
Q '� to
a) Zn
wa U a)
tTi
cTi
cTi
L U
Q- a) • n +_' o
a)
-0 -0 a)
a) u a) O
C
C
C
i 3
m
to
Q
E (B a)
3 a)
a)
v�i
a)
v+1i
s ++ u
U
O
a) () (B n T
C
C
In
4-1(6 v
U
3 o a)
N C `� U
- m� —
O
O
�'..
of
Ln
-0 f6 -0O cu
N
a)
N
Q O a) p c
U z L
O E co +'
to +� U >•
U a) +,
U a) — () N
Ln
to
++
41 4+
a vm�a'3
++
++ �
o )
-W 0 u
'}
C
C
C
p U .� L,
C 4� 7 -O C)C
to
C 0
� p
C to L
v
�
E
`n
.
.
—N
L
co
�
!
L
0 E
1 00
m
N a�) )
_
C CL -a ,
O
O
O
O Lp
a)
U O to +�
U O n3
v +9
n
a)
In
ca
I
v
Ln
3 +� CL
Z c
o
Ln
T
v 0
C
O .Eb v
C O L
CL OD
>-
f
:t
aL+ +L+
Ln C
O 0
C
O
a)
U
> p
O
U t 3
C
a)- = U
C O
O
to
_0 U
E
a)X CO N
Q)
O
4, a)
= wC0
O u
u
4- a)
p s a)
U
— a)
ai
O
> C
L
a)
i
O rB s 7
`n
+, > a)
a1 � 0
O N
t�
to
m 0)
0-� Q y
iN ++
'c
o> L
LJ
a) T E
+�
t
pU
�.
'V
m_
t6 C O C v�i
a) 'ao
c
tv In c
&
C Q O
a 0 L t
ca
a)
L m a
>
T
c_
u -= — o
'o
tw
f6 U
E
v
-0�
s
m (
QQ
v 0 n o
O E �'
oa u a�i
. ,
a
v
+,
E
.o
c
c Q))
ai f°
= L o u
o v o
to
o L>
J
�
Lw
C
Z
0 is u *�
7> o
ay Q
c
O• a)
= N
"' E
G%
Q
�.a L L .ln
t°c
aa)i
U w
U 6 m
U U
0 U
N
— L
n
O C7
g o to
a o
o> ^ a)
"
a c v o
m 0
to
+. � O
U tLa O 0
O
0 Ln Q)
T c z
o m O C
°
a)
o
�... >
v
O
U
ya
Q O +�
E v c
p u o
Z Q 3+�
N U a- ._
a �t
+
c
L C
+' ra
a C
a)
a)
> U
O
U
Q ea
O O O c� N v
+. "
ui �°
c=) +� v +1
i 3
N
o�_o
H °) cuo
E `_°a
a tuo
m
to y
i
v m E
� u Q
C n
`~ L X
D tv
Q O
Ln a)
a)
v -
u 0 m
a)
a
Q au
L
a to ,� a) m
a:+
a o m u
()
C u +u
v
to
o m
U o w
to iO
M
f6
Q'
u O� O i Q-
v
.� In L L
c O
— a! m
-p
L
+,4.
Q +�' E o
U
v
Q
W v O v
O ,�
a ,m o
v °
a+b
��,
'ate*' L O�wo
=
a1°mom
i U
v
$' O °'
+'
C)
v
a. v E=
O
L--Fa a) c
ro '� v o c
tr-o
N
'c u tin
o o E o
ai
E
to
Ln
o 0
U •}
a o
c
'u
to c
+. N
v
'� O -O
c
L
O
O C
a) bn
NJ
N
7 •� L c-O
i tE
a O a
i aJ
�
c Two
a E o U a)
O
i
I�
0 c v
W
MN
O
E
li
u
a)
+LU
�;
y
ra
v
t O>U L
tp
N C E
M .L L O
O a) a)
M
U
N O
N� by
N 3
N v U o O t
a) Q) a) +�
N v v c
� E> O
N v
cc N U
c3i
io
0 N L
N a) N .L
N tv
v
c6
H
2 CL �' 0=
Q E
2 3
C7
U tco
U tt'a
W
U tv
Ln E
O d
m
Y
1.1 L1
E
c
(U
E
c
O
w
0 c
O
ra
W
(11 c O
v
w
co
ate+ -
O 'O O
p � a)
tiA
o
C
E
LJ
p
to Y
to
C �. 4,
U
O L
Ln O
Ln
UAcu Ln
C O 11
C
p m N ?i C
U N
>' t6 a) +•'
ate) a)
C
a)
a)
>
- u
a) c
u -6 () a) a)
t a) a-+ -C
a aJ +'
0 U
+••' > a1
O
O N
'+�
+' tlC0 2i
3 f6 ^
OL C
V�)
o
�N
N 'Op a)
O
O 0Qol
n
+3�
om
E
a)
b o
-I
a) a
V
O
N
-p
a) O
:L! ra
y
N
0 p uu)
rB
O N
Ln 4"
Ln
Ln
Ln
E O
CL
p
O
Q a) O+,
4-1 c
tLn
U O —
W
U
W
U
W
U
m a)
0 u
—
>
(U a)
v a) L
(E CO > L
co
(a
n3
(O
O
41 $ La v
C p Co +'
O to
O
O
O
a)
C� 7
a
n L O
L O v a
d L -p
D-C 3 m
.Y
(7
4-
(7
.Y
U
tH
v O
o
L
L
O
O
U O
C
C
a1
O
++
co a) E
O L >: m
O p
NZ '� O 7
N
N
O
N
+.+
C 3 dA
5 m E
Z H aT+ = r
+� a) OC O
m
C
oo
-
v aO
°1
L)
Ln
Ln
L
O
Q
j O
+, +�
V) 00
a)O
Ln
U
U
U
Oi i
NL
Q avuu)
+NuLc�is
o
O
_a
-0 a)U
Q-uO O E
m
2iO E
T
E
a) a)
O
'-O N
O O u +,
O
Oa0aM
va
JL
-p
Ln Q'-o m
c av
a
m
sQQN
O
ca C a)v
co
L to 0
Oc
L
L
L
o
C
V)
V,�
n O v c
V)
V)u
xu
(jj v
a)
N L
co 6 > a) O
>, m O
>
Oon O
N
U
bO
-a— +.' _6 5
N a) 1 C N
L
L
.i' a)
O
-le
Ln
C
C
C
C
A=!! v
E L1
fl_ u
-
C O m
L O
N
>- a) m >i 42) O_
>•
T
T
aJ
Q
'O O
E +' V O
C _ tEo
C
C
C
p O
a) 0
ZC
L�iL a)
+�+ `� a
a) c Leif U U
aJ
a)
a)
L E
C
0O
N Ln c O U
C N U m cCo
n
C
C
N
co O
'+�'+�
7 O L
L O
.� O a)
O O-
O
O
O
+' +� L
u '> a) aJ M
OL s'
u
u
u
•dA
L p
(LO
a) •� 1
a) E C T
a) a) p
v
a)
a)
a) Z
E
m
O Q-cu
n O ate+ +�
Ln Q +� CO L
Ln
Ln
N
H O
v
7 u H L
C
.. .— U O 'n
+)
.. 'n co N
+'
..
..
..
+-+
..
i U
p
4. C U O
C
4a C Q v
++ L (3) a)
a+
a+
a+
ut
++ aJ
O_ +
M
C
aJ
a, (L)
a+
= '—a a)�
al -
a+ vL
EL
QJ n .>u
a) paN
+
a
a
ai
aJ L
+ +n� O
QN 7
U c pO(6
IA
LnL +E
Ln
Ln
Ln
EE
VI O Q
+i
a) a)
L 'a
C
�6
i L
O
Q
C +� ++ C r
U')
=
C= m=
cu
C
C
C
Lyp
C C
ii
O N x a)
U a a,�
�+
O p a)
U+,.— E,��
O m O u
U ac O
O
U
O
U
O
U
m
C
O L M
Um+�
C
m
l0
ai
c
OJ
.2
4 E
v
v
L)
a�
E
L
L
M
m
m
}u_+
U
Ln
E
Q- - L
�
a) `� ai
C
O
U
u
Q)
a) tv
mv
U
a)
p_ 7
Y 'p
vl E
a)
a) Q- C
_
Q
vi E
aLt+or
L.1 16 C
m p
N
O C
M
�, L
a,
76 o
0 O
a)
o f �
a,
Ln
a)
O
u
U qA
a)
d
a)
u
N '�
o
a)
�_ ++
i
Q
a)
ut
a+
C a) L
>
S
aJ C
+
h a)
a) N
0 O
Q
p C
U Ln
>
L
VI
a)
i U
L a)
iT — L1
N
y .�
_°
v
v
a LTi
= ai
t
v cu
Q
�i
_0)
'�
BUD
Cai
O a
t
~ +�
cLs
rya a)
Qj�
>
4J
v
N
a;
a�j t Q
v
a
c v
Qj 4�
4°
a
v
o
m
ai f°
oE)
3 `�
Lnt
o 0
c
° � v
L
� � u
�
a
,
�Ln
3 v •3
> c
c co
a v
v cv Ln
0 O
V)
= O-
Ln
Y v
Z Ln u
C
�'� m i
>
},. vi
N
•N
�,
C
Q Q
'i
E
C
.� a1 C
-O
Lail c
O
a)
a
++ C
f0
O
+_+
O
v
—
J
m
7 'a
C
.= a)
a 4-
H C 'a
a)
y
E
U
U
v a
t
of O
a o a
L+i1
N
ra c
O
O .Ln Y
o
aQj
0 p
i
a
H C Q
i
v
v
.�.
.. p cv
E
Q v
p u .-
a,
V)
Ln a) a,
L
u +�
�o
N V) C
o
`L°
V% L 3
0 v m
i
Q
u
r D M
O O
'p C
�, C
N
a bZ tn
-0
'u +'
—
v Ln
m
_v
•L
OQ
m
>
a
a)
a a)
a c
-0
O
x
v
oO>
L+QO
V)
,
+
Ln
�-0iLN
)>
'm�^
Q
C
h
pE
v
0 m
u
cEC
o
m
moQJ
o 0
a
L6
a u-0
a v V)
W
LU
1 v
"O
N
°1
Ua)va
uc
ai
ui E -
Y
Ln
n -�
f 6
o
1pX a)
(07
U v
E
O
C7
W p +'
a
W N M M
3 W v
W O
W c
U E
O
l9
W� +'
Q u
V c +,
U n
U a
m
Q a .E
Ln E
O 4 -
C
O
=
a)
a1 r I a a) Z5
v
L
Y o~ °0 v
'r
O Y
U 3 U O
O>
(O
p
L
p H
U C O C 4!
L a) U
O
Q
u *'
OL a1 u= a1 U
UQ
(Ua1
N N
a = O U
~
a)
Ln
V)
C =
4-1 L C
L= 6 m O
>
lD
o
v a
+� o-0� .} Q N ro
ut p =
M O
Ln (E bo a!
a'
Ln
f6 Q
'O
f0
O
7A aJ
a
a1 0' O C D @
co C: n>
0 c
N
=
c6
nj
Ln
:t
� —
v
aJ = T a) a)
O
=
a)
N
i
-0 M
0 N O �
'+�
L
f6
�p
w
L.O
VI
lEiU
N _ ++ u
�, ^ v a) is Q
ci
oC
O
�>
�i
6 cTi
U
3 4- a) = 6.E
Qj L L
T
ca
—
—
3 ,`—E p o
—
o°
a' c
� v >= a °
L
)
ao
ao
O
W L a)
a°
L
aLn
o
o
12 V C O
�
u
m y
E.L o wm
p
L
Ln
c L
a! Q
a L L 0 � a)
C�
T
T
p 0
—
� 0-p-0 MLn
a
p
aJ
a)Vt
� a1 t N
+
m .O
m
bbo
>
>
c��
a1 .�
>
txo -0N= CLO
4-
a!
+�
C ++
-I'AT a-+ 7, t
LA_
_
= O
-p
C � Q v +'
c
m
Ln
N
N
N O
Q
= a)
(n aj 6 o
v7
p
U
C +�
C
C a)
3 C
s
C L L 3 7
'ij O L
C
l6 (A=
U
W Ln �-+
a1
VI
ate+ -0V
Vf -a
Z .2
u1 VI
L
+O+ L c a)
Vf L N s .F u v U
a0+
H
C
C O
L
O
O L C
=
L
7 Q
O
0 0
aJ
O
O L
s
+�
LS >m O L
O aj > v O L E Z5
O
o cn
U
U 3
CL
U a
o
U ---a u a— V)
U
o
4q
=
N N
T
V1
m
a)a''
C T
vi
ate+ m
7 m
a1 �
a
aJ *,�
O
�0
'a
0 0
a) Vi
=
u
"6
a1
s
m
�
t
O C +�
m
�
O
Cp
x
1=
OL
u
pO
a)
t vU
o_0
0-C�
>
v *' �1
o
a1 N_
U
O_
'U V
>
> " c
m VI
aJ 'AO
`�
M
`� a)N
_
'+.+ a
u
LQ
+' C U
O
O
O N
a1 =
�
u
m Ln
u
= H
CU
j.
Co •V
��� �0 1
Q
—2 Q
�
" .Ln
— 7
�LA b0
y O w 2
N C �
c6
+�
Q
t
a
n M O-
v
QQ.
a
="
.-
a>i
'a C
N
aVi v
L �+ 'a
o
ro
3 �_
v
E
3'�
�_
a '3
aJ
a. W 0 Z-
-0
Lnc� u
7 O
_
Q L ro
w
a) C
(6 'n C
=
0 m aJ u
w of W
,M
QJ
'� O
_ O
O
m +�
U
L YO
L
fl
L Ln
v
Vi
u
�n
O l7
O O
i o a
v
Q
m aJ -a
E
Q�-C _
'
; x v
C
u O_
o .2 �
o
v�
�
Q Q Q)
}'
�
3 M 4 J °
a, M a, L
U m
L c
o m o
a
2 L ho
u,
L 4.
O w Q
V
3 a1
N
O
a1
O
a
m
i Q-
7 vi
,a)
L
4. .-
-0
(6
U
f0
Q =
0-
a _
•�
w Ion
L
= C 8-_
a1
= C _
CU
f�
01 = ++
VI
�
V L, +-•'
a+
a�
_ +� �
V) •O bn
•O'
cLo
a;
a1 'v
LL
c T
CU
m
t '�
u
f6
l7
L
_U
U
m
= L
O
cUv
W N �' m
>'
�Cr
O ,n m=
O a� V)
i
Q
N v
QJ • O
O_
zT
C
�.
H .�
a1
v .�
Q -p
QJ
U
.
�,
+�
aj = Q
W
N
al o O u
qo v
m
4w Q o
coo
°_°
N
u v OL t!
Gl
= o
a '> N�
G�J
(7
aJ V,
u N
C
;[
'N
Q 'a Q >j
i
'�
M
O (U L �
L C LL
u ao
u
o
Q
,i
as
in
a+.' `L° Q- V,
v E a,
°
a) o m
c '�
ri
_=—p c
vi cu
p a
w
u
a O c=a
0 Q; _
O L
o
a
o,
c
Q
a L u
a,
a .=
ay, o L
4.1 p
i
N
"4 a1
O
ci = n3 L
a'
3 L=
Z) L ate+ m
M
p a) >
M
w_
m
M
'a O v
i6
9 O O
a) is
M
U
cc
Q ,VI
L
L Z
Y� L0 C
Q- O_
a)
(p a--�
f0
1� �
u
f0
H > �+ Q
a0+
f0
ti Vt aJ b
ti � O cv
co a)
W u u
O
W O
aJ
O
evj u v
O
p 'L
3 nz
H
u>
U .�
(7
U u
OC
C7
OG Q w
Z
(7
Z u .�
Z O E 0
V) E
O w
0 m �
O m
C) a
M
c-I -Fu
+�
N
Owl
Ln
=3
O
L
p
T
0 L i
.�
:
fu
cc 7°
3 Mrs
i
++ -° -°
C
C
v
c
l6 4,
Q Ea
v
v
7 C
�
a' v
t
v
E a)
N
w °
v
j C_0
Co
C 'L T-0
> Q
m
L-0-0
v
C)
ro
-0
L
1 E v
Y
O O0.
U
—
O H
C
'++
c
C
'r0
O E
VI v
L c O
++
O
>
c
•7 v
z O
tn CL
L
+� 3
O L
Ln
.X
i
p °
'� C--0
L
-a
4-' n�
N T
-a
.�
Ln c�
) O
r6
'� � C
S T ._
v
C
v O
z
o
+, v
u m
c O
°u'
t
L +'
v o u+
c
+j
3 a
c
v
o
S
s
a)
v
i' '7
L
-O
N
M
° i
O .L
X
+' E
v
°' N
O^
c
'ta
M v
vVi a-+ O
pro
v +�
U
•v
U
v O
>. `n
C
(6
p
Q 0 C
m
�
} O
C
C o cv C1
C C
+- O
ca
a C
3 r6 [6
p
N N
a
>T Ln
'L
rE
r6 m
°
+� C7
c- N
ca
0. L
a)
'a E
L
a
c u
T ra
v >
Co O
E
v> v
v L is 3
(� L
U v=
v
sz
+,�
Q
a'
o v
L L
ai
E° m
E Q
.�
+�
v
iv u o
Ln
v° +�
v
ate'
3 0
X ro 0
p
ate+
v L
o
a o
co
E
a t
•" L v>
a,
41 � o t
m°
+° '+�
CL°
3 v 3 v
°co°
v z
a, +�
L
ro
-0
� � °
a
� �
v
0=3
°
v v ro
m c"
•v
-
� 41
o a�
3 cCa
o m m°
c c '�
o
r" a
°
L E a�
'F ao
o
- 0
G:
N
o
f
v n
°-
U
U
n f6
�
Zf v C
� v
E +� +�
N °
°
�
�
O L �
ao
L
ra
v Q
p +, a
�
v C C
ra OO
_v
-�
v
0-
v
ca
ai
o .v 3
E E
v aa) v
o
o a0,
C.
�
a v o
•O
Q O v
Q
T
-0 'p Q)
L Q
O
0-
Q p +,
L=
L U
,E
p
>. N
_
U
-°
i
a
'p
�_ C to
v
°
i' rLp v M
+-�
+,
v
W
+-+
-C
.�
p
t a�
rca
° o�
a
rua -0 b v
m
a y
�
Q? H
°
o
3 v a
v
3� E
rn °,
v u
c
u
c
c a
o
m
an
Id �n
v
+�
c 'O v
C
H
Cn L ro
LU
+� O
C
oC1
O
7 aui
2 •L -
3°
O
O T
v ro
c..�
v
C ra O
ra
'� +�-' O
v v vi 3
v U
N
v
E
a
'O m
u C\f
L,
v
sz
O c ro
v
a0
O -�
L
O In
ra v
+''
ro
a) L
w
E N
=
L
+a'-�
°
N
L °_ L
Q-
ra
CL a)
a!
CL aJ C
'- v
4-1
O +.+ •c
L
+
a-+
E
�'
++
U
L
v v
ra
3 v a
+�
T N a.
O
0 C-
v 0
+,
.E
O +�
O
c
c O
ro U
v
4-
E v
v +J v
v
CU
Ln o
U= a
c v
ao
L Q Q
_o °n
3 3
o
va. +1
a
Ln v
v
CL E
+�
o
CL
0rQ
o
3 >
rLa
m .v E o
avi
a' u
E
E
ra
u v E
�
CL aj
vi
r0 N
u
v L
v
�n
v
Ln to
Q to +'
O
0 u°O v
~
c
cv
3 ua-1
°
= z
o
°
v �
H L
o v
L -0
o
C
a ulu
0-
Oo
L L
°
>
>ro
v
v
E
E
Et
L
v
LA to
V
.N C>
++
Cl U In
L
v
p U p
L (6 CL
L
C v
C L CL
W
�
L
v
O
L
H },'
'rn L
a) Q'
O
C � v
v
C � v
v L1 C
.'^ +�+
Q- L � O
°-
C +'
ra
v v
v
+'
ra
Q
C� 7
p
m
�
p dA LZ
v�i
o O L
U t ra
°
p
O v L
U L a
L O
u
X ro
v sZ
C L
Q +� Q
p
u 3
-C
H H
+�
3 E
._
O 0
U U n
LJ
+�
v
>
o
°1
°- E
t v
u
ra
3 O
L
3 O
ra
O
O a'
C i
v v
+�+
f6
c
o• C
=
v -p
C 4-1
a' CL,
Ln
Q+� oN
(UE
Q E �
c>J sz
O v cu
ra
0 L T
_O
v>-0
v
> E
O
v O N
> c
C ra
U CA
-0U
+�
ro
v v O
L
-0 ro c
CL •0
N
U
p
z m c
v
v
v ._
v E +,
c
oa
ro
�i N v�
Ln
ra
LU
a�
Savo°
Q
Q
c
3,
v
a ao
v M 0
c�
v
ro
4,
=
CL a-
w�
N
c
o�
m
0 0
v Eo
a+,�
0 a
U
as v O
O
_ rca
OJ p c
o
U
va
o E.�
v
a
aU
�� >
v
eo
-= L
u O>^
u O
-°
h v—
v
01 v
y
c L
ro
H +' a
_
C ra ro
a
Q cu
°1 a) v-
c
a, c
C O
as °
C v
i
Q
O p 1
J
3 E
a)
to ° a•''
-0 E
�0
°
°c°
a
= C z
O
� O
4-
3 aJ
C7
r°
O v
0 c
u o
'L
,
0 � o
O
L O 0.
U
C
Lu
I
M aJ
v -°
N C
a C L
C
O
M
H v>
V
H 7
'2 N
v
tO -C_
u
z
a�
°1 u E
>
O ro
>
R
of
M Q c
c
H
z a Ln
L
�
+�
z 3 a
cc
Z ro E°
In E
C) d
m
tY
°
O
U
N
Q
N 'd LO ate-+ E
(�,)
-O
a-° °
a)
+� O 0-t;
U
-0
-0
o
oNE
v o
Qa
x LO
a) o
o,
o
�... U tF
Of
Z
Of
Z
Z
�
Z
U
>. W CDC
v, V C
[O
(B
(6
�O
U O
L 3
Z_
N a) O
++
O
7 O
7 O
O
N ++ c I
_ o
p
C >�
Q E >. � Q ra O
O
O
O
O
U Q ro
L7 v ++
U N �_+
C L T ra N
M
M
m
M
a)
M
of
M
Q
Q C Y
�� X In
° a) t
�••� 7 a-•• 7
U S
Z
d'
Z
w
Z
Z
ra ra ra
—
41 a) aj
M E •�
N c C a)
,V
L
f Y E o
MMo
t -2
In Q
ra a) aj
QJ
a) L 0 3 C O
Rt
U
•�
N a) v
O
M
M
M
M
>' °
M C rp
•ro
O p T 7
° L L
Z
Z
Z
Z
Q—
E ("�
OC ai
Z �--�
0- boh
)
)
a
u)
a' ra
6 O a) a) ++ f6
(a
u
U
U
(-i
uo
O Y
1..1 E rn
L
s
O
v a)
O
L
a-C i- 0 Q
d
d
L
O
L
d
L
d
L
a)
L (a 6
L CO =
a
O LL aI
a•} v m E T
o
0 0
0 67U W
o o
LnLn v E °° 3 ,�
Ln
Ln
L
a) ° In
�, a)
to Q Q T t to ra
>
T
T
T
L C O
v
T O
c
c
c a)
c
c > ° E �
o v
3 cv
ca
co
co
Fo CL
o E
cv E m
o
+' E-0 v o ra ra
c
c
c
c
c
c a;
U O O 3
3 rV
a) >. aj
rLa v
L O
•�
+�
•N
a�
•�
•�
a) GAO U
LA
•�
a)L +�
L GO 7 (La cN
•c E
Q V 7 E 'n a) to
O
O
O
O
L -O
CL L
O L X
O
c° v Q
v O-C .� c v `v E
U
a)
u
a)
U
a)
u
v
c .Q
v
u
v E
i U a, 7 d0 'O .—
a) vl
a)
N
a)
N
w
N
a)
V)
i .0 '`-'
Q
a) L
N OEr
2-w
o
fa
a) ul C O U
C
C
C
C
C C
O CIO cnQJ
C -°
N
O a L O
aJ
a)
a)
a)
a)
aj
z- ra o
U
Ln
=
0 W,
= m
= o In
— 'O +� O+ Q
CCC
C as — al
C° 'O
c 0 M L M Qi
t6 Q Q v, CIO 3: to ++
O
U
O
U
O
CJ
O
U
O a)
U L a..•
O L O
(J Q to
>
U
6 O
pOn
c6 v
r
r6 L1
a•
`^
L
O
Q
c L
In
a) C
CO
a) c rLa a)
ai T
C
rO CIA
en N C
O
O
ra i
L
a)
E o
— a 3 i
a, a•., °
N
E
C
L
ra
C,°
Q o
to In L ON
Q
" o c
+'
+r a)
a)
In
O ra
-E
v, L
a1
> a>i
c c
ra In ` ca
3 v v °
c
oQ
Q
qA° 7 W dA
C r6
r6 O -° -t -o
L O
C aj
i
E a)
v, O d en
L
>
Q N
° a)
co .0
to •C
3 C)
N L C Q M4�
°
a)
C
Q a)
C
r0
L O
a
4-13
In V,
'�
a) a) 3:
E
N
Q))
L
a o
c
Q
O
O�
ate)
E �;
o v
v+JN 3
�►�
}-T o
-vim a) N
su
c c
.aj
C
N a)
U a) o C
�' a
aJ C ++
s
a) -O
L
%
C
cu �,
Z
Q
E
ate+ Q .2 C
- a °
O 7
a) m
L a Q
1n
(a
_v
°
s
N
� p
C7
p a=i ° c ra
s
a O
O
O a)
v > -0 t'aj
a O
Oc
.
N
++
v,
+r c
ai
aj
O
Z,
N
oai
H
fa
.V L
O V UJ
+0.+ +.+
04�
C
O
O
a, d
u
O) c `~ aj O
i O N
� pi c0 •�
•�
c
L
a
a s
4 ci� aE)
}'
= n a
c
v u u
rn
t E
SP N
b y
'•
v
4.. c
o Q o s Q
o M
te a°
> c s
a)
CC a)
H a)
a
_
Q aai
v m O
+�
v� ° u E
a) v
_
O rLa
H a, L°%
Q E °1 a)
u
a raaj
th
Q
c�, v
o
,�
a
t M
C
a u
a>,
C a�—
4-a>
L
O
.� « m 7 3
C
at> X
0 E O
v, E
E
a i
av
a, c oa
�v a)
�, ot, v
= c
o O
,n
o E
a, m a)
O
a
o
C
ma,
d
'• c m v
Q
a O
a) U 0
c E N
L
a°-
ar
a
E
�'n m O o E
E+
oc T E
H> ,o . a0
a ra °
Z ra
M
O Cu
H U
H U , a)
ty O
d' •� X
H ra
N Q .'^ a) c
ty '�
^ > ra
ty 'L
01 r-i
N
o a)
ai rp E 0
Z 4..�
E
L •> �
In
Q L
a)
ra O
+L+ L ++
a)
Q
p� O a)
a)
> >
OC °
OC
H
z a-Z
0 U V) OU
Z Q +�+
z O L" rya 'O
aj
z 'O
z vTi
C) a
m
c-I -Fu
O
0 _
v O
N C
i
a)
j
Q
tab
L
r a) a)
a) L
s a)
O
N
.V
N Q n +'
•u
C m O
d
+, OA
In
+
+ co > 'O
cu
Eo ° 7
p_
()
JLn
M N V)
(� Q U
U
C
a)
C i)
a) a) C
L
ate+
a_
OC O M
s O
_
++ 0) T
m C= a_+
H
cn .—
_
N
-O
=
7 s
7 O aL+
s
C: v++—
++
C7 U O
m
a)
a) J C
a) a
O p
vC L
aL) C a)
to
d N
ca
u
U O
O-
�+O
W o +1
p
m a -°
O
a)
a) v
p
u
u �
�} a)
C 4 , U
(7
�}
p
U
u u
++
Ln w O
O t
ra a N
O
N
p
•0
p- +Q) .0 C10
O
m -p
d 'j
l0
N
C
c C
O
U
= ca
Q (0 L =
a)
Z u
�
Z a c a)
'A � M 'O
W
U
J
a)
a) co O
U m U
t
v p
u - E -a
u Lt
—
r
u N a) a
—
u
—
—�'
�
�
� aj —
4 o a O
al
_
= L 4a
OL IV
=
v +�
ra
t
S Q -0
CL
O
C �O
N -(�
d
Lai
n3
d +' _0- -C
L C U
d
d
+'
+' L v
d
aJ t L p
O O
O- '++ O
�O
�O
+� Nc s
I— + — N ci
v a)
Ln
in =
Ln
Ln
_T
E
_T
cp
cu y
Ou
OU
u p = Q
V O a
f6
c�
C
(6 3 L
C cn Q
m
m
z
t v
i NO
M y
Ln
p
m N—
d m
a)
ro
m
7�
>T
cV)
c 2-0
>-
c
T
c
°
°0Q
0� L O a
U
o
—
O
i m to
�
)
3 +3
3 N
p C >.
rya
N -O L
v
n
u
a)
t
u m +� a)
a)
Q a) O
C T
_0
c *� D Q
C
C
O
O p c 2
(6 = L O
O
p '} O O
O
O
L
L O d
a) 'L L C
'O �•
a)
E
a) = to C
a) O a) m
a)
a)
aJ
a)
w
a) a)
Q =
>
V)
(/I 4-O
V)
V)
H
H dA
>
� a) m
n3
=
O
'+-+
++
++
++
C >�
1 —
4- -0 L
O -ldU
C
C
C
C
C
C M In
N
c
4, •�
�•+ E
ar
41 ++
5� O
b+ Ln
a)
v a
co +°
p
a)Eo
U O U
U
U t0
U
(Ua
a
U m cn Q E
c
on aJ
�,
c ^
uo
,n
0 u
a)
L
O
c TLn
a-�+
ca
7 .E O
O '�
(B
—
Ln
U
O 'AU
o f
'
a) M
=
c�
Q
N
6 a)
+ X
o
u
C
w+ O
E a)E
C N �
a)
L C
C
Q) L
L
_v
O
O
O
u
V C
_E
+' H
L
?� •_
N
O Q
O
= 'a
co
O a)
of
M v
ro v°
O 'C �
u
"
o
v E
j.
.V
O
N
-
O I m
Y i
� O C
Ln
Q)
C:
co
co
O
p U 0
U U
(a
= L
a)
U a1
a, E
c
o a
C
Z5
> O
•° °°
3Ln
tea,
o
v
o
L
.�
aco o
" .� v
a
3 °
a
O
o
o U
E
(n
ca
C
c7
i
a!
Z
3 Q=
a) O E a)
>T
+�
u O
N N
n
N
O
O
� w
O
O
N m
-O Q
E
E
>O a)
Q ca
^
Q
m Ln
N
O
O
a) o
O
a) a)
aj
E
7 a)
of
�_ C
^
ra +� °
s
7 .__ a)
v
a *'
c
V)
e U
a
U fa
=
6 v >
a)
E N
L
yf a1 is
L
i„
U
U
a)
O
0 C) O=
u
d
a
..O f0
a)
O a1
?i
,O
p (.0
L- E
7 C
a••
m
u r
O
u a) >T a)
O
.0 ac)
,i
O Z,
t O=
+, a) •ca
p
p ro
v c
OC a)
a N z-.
u
> E
N p_
o=
+� c
v
W°
o c
i
Q
E (v E
v
Q
E
T .�
a�i ai
•�
4..
aEi
Mtn to o
G!
oLo
y�j •`
p
c
"v aJ
U
mn _
s
h ._
o f v a)
}?
>
= t
u
Z p L
ca v
oa O a) -0
u
u
_
a�
ri
n3 L
o,
u
o
�
°) °)
Q
E a)
_
C°
Y" E
v u a,
a, m
o a) E
m�
o
E v U 3
°
o
a .X
ai
x L U
N
3 LL
o
of
L 3
L
a) n `n
>. ra 'd
W
> O
4, L
E
1l
I
O
I
M
O Q
u u
oC
L
OC
L
Q
�
N
O
N O
Z
I-
Z
u
N E a=) Lai n
Z
�"! Q
N val u
Z
a 7
M Q a)
M
'i
1p 0 0
%6 O E vi
ji
n '=
N O
m
Q
� E X
O
OC O
O
O
OC a1 a
p
OC O
OC aJ
m UA
In a) VI
ci
(n U
ci
L U
O
V) E
o a
m
c-I -Fu
(3) N
(N .� S
Cbb
ro
L W v -0
ro
O 0-c O
>` m C N
X -p -p >
i--I
L.L V
0 'v
J
Ln w
M
N
N
N
�
N i a) C
0 (r)
to a) >' N a)
U
f0
=
f6
p
i Q) L
L(6
V'
Q
V'
N
N L C
N
O
(7
O
N
CC a) 'O
N
a --I
r-I
ci
4CO' W 0 C •�
•�
I�
N
N
N
t.p
E E O m
C
or
z
=
of
=
x
rn
C
L)
tj
U
U
U
ap v o
V L ++ N
C
LL a) N a)
O
L
CL
CL
CL
CL
a
a) m oo c, +_g-+
a
0 0
0 0
0 bLTn a v
VI
In
V1
(n
In
Q) L
>
>
>-
>,
>•
O C qp
a)
m
C
[b
C
to
C
ra
C
ro
c
C C
(D cu -�
(6
(o
to
f6
m
a) _ a) i
U
U
V
U
U
7 4 0 UU
� O
N
C E u.
a)
a)
a)
O
!fin
N
VI
N
N
++
C
O
w
u
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
N
C
Q
•�
C
L 3 N V
O U
U
v
U
v
U
v
U
a)
U
a)
EU
a
N
(u v a
a)
00 a)
a)
a)
a)
O
-C a) L +`
cn
aJ
V)
V)
to
V)N
H = a)
>
a)
F+ �O - O
C v U
aJ
U_
a)
al
a)
QJ
0 al L V)
UD a)
•�
O
•L
•0
•N
•0
f6
•� -� n3
C
C
O
O
a)
C
O
C
O
C
O
C
O
>
C C— 4+
O O M
U
s
U
(J
U
U
C
v, +�
U
bA
cLo
vi
v N
c
O
C
[6
v
y L
+1
(6
5 c
+6 M
O L
N
O
a)
C !o
L
U O \
ate+
� O ` L
(CE
v
N
C
0 a) O a
2 t >
bA
MU 4 J bA -0
'ate—+
O >, o L
vn -a
a) -0
InCU
ate-+
a 0
N
-Fa tD.0
4- UO
a)�C O
�
O
0 LC
°
a) a)
CLO
Tc
M N
o
a
a) E
°ao
o
tLr-
°
W
bo
Lv
)
c
a
=O O
Ci
NQ
co
O O O L a)
O *' L
C' Q
a)
75 to
t
r- tw (J >
v
n
_i
�,
a••' ,} 'a a) 'O >
+� Q
O ro O
h V Q +'
Ln 'N
E v C: v
to
a) U
a)
aJ co a)
L >�
,n
y
C
n
� a)
L
C (n O-0 C p
0 v f6
v C c
at
Q +� 0 Z
L a)
+�
a +� '+� U
u
o
c 0
crco
m
>-
u u C
O 0
0 Q
o s
.5
n
c6
-
i s
O
' 0-
Q
0 0 C 'bU—p T
N N O
>- acu te"
7 C v
c
o
-
v
E
v v .� p
C L +-
0 '3
c
a bA • 4�
Q
3 c
+=� N
u o v
�> Q
3 �' °
v
g a
7•
f6
C
�_ C ro
O
a>i o
-0 f6 L Q a) N
O a O
a) N ate+
-C
p +'
C
L Q Q
� O
G�J
4- 0
_O
U
O
4-1
N O s- U
i m O ho
aJ v_
'L
�) 0
— a) —
h
U
C
a1 Q
15 CL
v_f
C7
E
3 _ u
t M
v '+�
s +�
a)
O
O ra
N
) a
C
O_ 0
7� E
C ra
i N
N
m m U 'n
O
i
L
L- Lu
v L
o�
• V
"M �Eb
CU Ci
-Q
� c
CL
� ° .dp t
v > CL a) N
0-a
a a o
O
u o
aj a)
E
fp
u v
c
o
0 = ro O
v v
a,;
c M U o 3
.? +,
3 z�
i v v Q
c
i
�'
a)
i C7
p °)
a-
c6
to
un c
O
c
O
v Q F c a)
U U
°
ar bn v c v
Z > a) E
- aa)) a) a)
a ra ra >
'a L a)
v
0 C u
v
i L v
O N C
G!
Q
f6
C
O
'�
Q p
p 'Z, w_
C
L `0 _C N o�
o v
+,
r n3
N
� 'n Ncu •tio
c° V
- C7 M
-6
a
i
U
al L c a..'
a)
o
a) O N W > O
v
= 7 � Q a)
a
m N
o-0
� ++ m
a)
'U
>>
o
Q _=
p CL 0
a
v w o
D O O 4) L U
a>i
'a
O
C -C T
a
0 0
C
c 4-1
= a) O C
ri
_> c
I
3 'C Q
.° c�- 0
r C 'ao 3
v- 3
I
Ln
a 'u
o
.�
a a, n3
o0
c�a
o Q E v a) ._
Z
0 0 v- C
a` f°
o 0 0 0
cc a
E
v
.�
a, C
oo
-0� a,
v E v
+' E o
a o c�
z
e i
I v
(•/i
a) fo N_
L
Or
(o a) i +�+
M N 0
Ci i 'O a)
ti f6 O
n1 •> a) >•
N
z
L E
z
DD N — 7
C >
a0 a) O O bA
eV .�
z
•C
`~ N O v�i O
ti prop > O c�.�
Ncic a) '+ cCo
N ? �
R
N Q U) ate.•
z
Q
ac N (6
E E
Q
i> a) C W
E
L a) X
i f6 L
� V
Q
L. W C M
H
c7
Z cr
C7
Z Q to L v L
Z o- Q v
Z Q Q .E O
Z a�
l7
Z 0 L v
Ln E
C) d
m
i
>
L
V
() 0) C 4'
�
N
a) aJ
4-
-p
_0
�q _o in
4q C
L
T
C) 0
2i
Q- a!
m
Q a) _0 V
O
co
L,
O
C
V)
+-' aJ
Q
tin C .'Q
1 p 0
X L+ O
'°
-6 X
0 a) -r
c
LA U
a) L
ai-0
a) E �
�
>
C)�
r
O
�
a)
° ML
Y p >°
4J
L
Q
+�
a)
N +�
-°
,U .T ++
E +'
W
c6
C C 4.
O 3 a)
.� U
p U ta) a)
7 O t
U
+,
= ++ C
Z3
E
p m
'0
a)
u
r6
p c.J
0 >j
.`^ U L
p
C C N
OO O ai 'O
N
C
r6 —
QJ
a--�
�
L C
_0
'a
7 o C
Q Q - _N
of a) v
0 a)
cp .
u
C a)
+�
dA O
C a —I
p
0 LJ W
m of C _
O
�,
Q
.�
Q
aJ OL
i
+,
�
3 Ln-b
bhp
a)
v N U
ra L N �
L .0 H
> C ca N
L
p
aJ
v
-1
Q
O
v Q)
v
a
QH o
c 3 E
c
c� �,
°
° ra CL Cep
c
o 2
`6
O O O
L
ai
p T
C
O L
Y
OA Y O
ON 'a 1
°
O
+ co
O
U ra
m
+� _ O
cts ro
O O U
++
'vl
i
Q)
-
Q
bb Vl C
.F,
U
,
3�
0 'L L
CC^
L 4- C
a1 «s m
Q
a)
N
C aJ 0
7 C
of
.�
aJ p o cn
M M ° i
Q aj
++ of _U
(O
ate-+
.,
> a!
C
l�0 N U
U
U
N Q
a)
(V Tom(
cu
O
= O—
0 u A N
y
N Q
O
L
0-
a--+
>
Q-0 Q
u
O
U
fa o
U u QJ
O . �••�
L (6
>-
�
+
�
(
LCN
U �
a^
v
p
v
�n
a
cr0 -M
�In
o _0
+'
u a
N�
cC ca
C C
0-
p
Z
m L
UA
p avi
O
to c6 cLo
Q — i C
'�
�
C
"
N � `c�
4J
dA r_a N
C 0 •� N C
Q p m � +n
bA 0
�}
-p
i L
_O
U
N
d
a) > c6
(O
Vl
Ut U
_C O
H
C `�°—
C to C
OV
f6 U
tap
N
>
a)
O
C�
aL+
-0 Y
L
� L
O F
aJ ', 4
rO
N
U C
a
i U fa
m t6 > >i
O bjO lfl
C
C=
V p
0 *�'' a) (7
m
C O C W C
a) C U C
rB
C C
aJ
a) ate-+
W of a) aU+
E �_ a)
-C-
ct) C O
a)
C
C 'C .N
+7 a)
C
Y
+�+
O
C
L
N
0 m L
C
O
C
ut .0
m O
O
O Q°
a) +'
taa
a)
of
tw
Q 7 O
L
d > °U OU
-O
`n
a)
a)
a) U >
a) � T
oOi O
OVA
Q
O
Y
tap +`n-+ m
�
E
Q a) aJ cr —
0 +J N a)
_0
a/
[6
'p
V w aJ
o7
"6
C
-0 C X
a)
U
7 _
y N N a)
+J 'C O
y L +, N 7
C >
+'
of
m - �,
_U W
L
L
-°
a+
H U O L
++ Q
Vf +�
u 'p
of
N
•uf
v
,�
aJ j U
j
EO a)
a)
•vl a)
a) '+.+ p
C
OL
OL
N
OOn
a)
Q
-0-
O
U
O
Q_
t5 O
toC
OA
a) N O
V
O
U
u
O N O -CO
U a U
•—
-O
U
N L
O
L
a)
N
.E
'�
C
cu
N
L
-0 cu
O U
L
L C o� °
ro C
O
-Ca)
.� V 4•
C
O
p
U -0 in
a)
+�
ut C +,
0- C C
mO
E
a) cLE N C
C
(n l0
a
O
Ln 7
`n C O 0-O
to +
O C Q>
N
fl
cLo
C
tCo
Q N a) L O V
O C
ru Q+
i
++
O L� 0 > C
E
v s C
VI
C
N
aJ
4 N rB a) .°
cu
u
U VI a)
In
cn
'a
�O
C O � 0
O
� N
to
m
m ;u
p
Q
C,o Cor-
C O
N vU O
(u—a°)
Uq
C
>
pip
C +� -O
v
f6
t' O
a)
.� to
.p Eb aC
mV) C
`L° c >
o
a�i
o
tw Fu
- -a
.— aO 5 v
L
V)
a) v O
C 4-1
O
M In
C a) p
i
N
Z
�
L
C
N N
a) p a) C L a)
CC —_ OU O O
a)
IA
ca
N
_O
`n
ai
C O
O U Q C
C 0
O O C in
�,
T
U
t
a)
aj
a
U ftS
-0
Ln
'�
-O .0
p +T� T a) '>
U -
> .}' 'p ,ro
G
d
a)
-
cU.)
E
_ `� •O �O 7 c
N
aJ L C N
v
u
'V
T
a E
o .o V) v
c
o, E
rL°
�=tA
o
is
Q
Q
v
C
Q)
Q
0 v
U' •U U
m C a) p
c
to O�
v o;
Y
L
C
O
L
v
.,1 0
a
a)
aUi
t
v
N c— E u
Ou
'X
U v
GJ
n
ai
L>
7 N
NO L a) a) O
a)
H C
0 m I� t
>
O N
y oaJ > a E C
`~ Z
O
H v+'i n L O
ri
4J
>
E
f6
v :O
_ c
U C-
0 Q
-p
'a
T
v
w 7
O� L C C Y L
M fB
a)
'a
•_ mU
E Q
M
W
o
U
I� O
C a) C -u Q
L -0 C
E
i..
a) ro
O
to
a)
C
to
H
, L
K o>
Z
p
L
�
q
p
N
O ra
O E C O
C O V O C
Q ro
v 0^
a) a)N
H
NO
C7
Q
to
Q
C7 -C
s
H Y U ry U +�
C) m
H Q- W
L
Q a
m
�--� (Cf
Q)
=
a 0 0
m N
L p
— -° ro 3
C O 6 p
'� '6 >-
D N
Q) T a >
z Q) N Q)
N
+� V Q)
co
U = :}
u Q)
Q) C)p -°
Q)3 Q)
m ro O ro L
a
+� O L
v ro
C N a
c 'L c
v
N J �_
d r0 E E p o
O Ln O N p
—
p Q) 3 vOi Q)
L
Q] {n VI
O°
� C
= E
L Q •0
H N co
N
+� n p m
v Z '6 O L ra s
3 QJ Ln v O
c �i -0 � N
Ln Q)
Q j N �n y N
C r0
•v Q) Q) Q) V
'O
N -O +, >T 4) o
Q)
v O x
,Ln u-0> c y
Ln cu�n 41 O
Ln E .� in co c
— Q) O Q) — N
M Q N 4b C
V Q) 7 N
° +�
z o Q) Q)
�n
L c
O N C L
> rn p a
v
Z x Q) Ln —rn
Q) 3
L) Q) O
N L
Y U 'O
,in O-
C N w O ro
ro
O
Q) Q) "
�
U 1n z
N
++ v; m - C
++
N 'O co 0 Q)
° N
N oA L— >' `n
V1 +-'
U +� Z) u c O Q)
0 O
of
•C
_
o bM ro L ° c
° i - Q Q) �_
Ln ° QJ 7 L Q) U
N
O C Q)
Q +� Q) ro U
C C ° L
Q)
.—I
U7
L ro L
co Q E '�
C L
QJ Q) +' N Q)
N
+, Q1
'° p L N >- i
Z
U In V ro
i c o m +�
+'
`�
+c+ O +1 C�}� N
GCA °
>.
'0
LJ
Q) rn O +�
v Q) U c
w N
Q)
N ro
O
L
O t Q) c L N o
p Q) ° z O v
ro
> 4) L m +' -0 p
30 d
d
vCi m •c N Q) � N
U Q)
z 'Q °�' °' -a c
C
°' N U +� M "
++ W
O
to O O t +� N ro
.F_
r14 z v� Q) �
H�
_
� N Q p � FD � C
ro n O�
Ln
to ��� O� .c6 i
>
C O p
Q
V Ln O
Oc
�
m +�+ i -O m,'n
C ++ � V ro 7
ro
l6
C d 7 Q)
o 'O L
C C N
N -6 i V
ro
C
C
C f0 Q) E Q)
C
ro
E +�''
u L C c) C
Q ,+N—+ L
N -a +.+ O -6
to
m c m � '
s � ° v
w °
° v 3 a) _
c
LI
Q) L ro U n O
-O
O
Ln
c N Q) co Q)
N O L io �O 4' C
•0
Q)
tlA +� Q -a .a C
C7 In -O L
C
-O Q) u a) m ,� ate+
N
'C
N N N
N
CO z Ln
C c j Q Q) rn
t M E
O Q Q) 7 co a ro u
L L L
+�-+
O
O c L c Q)
Q) O L
a; +� -a +� p
N .0 Q) a) `�
O
U
te+ Ll in
-°
3 Q
x �
Q)
arn
aT+ N
0 c O� 4
O
O Q) c- t
C Q) T OA Q)
L
0 o °i
Q)
N
M U }° o o
3 o ro • m� o 0
Q
�' 00 t ^Q) +'
L o o c
" O L
F
V
Q)
Q) U ro Q s
C)L a m
E x
L v
p
H U (�
H -a co O .`n
n
Q S 0) W i-.l � c
L
c)
n
C C N �� E E
N
C x C> c Q c
C
v L O c v v
L I L ir_ d a W 0
p
O O O O
u u 0= U u
O �° Q L 3
u vL
U
c
7 O
O z
c p p +-'
r`o
a,
c c� aQ a o=
c Ln
>
c
O z
Q H
O •— 3 o ro Q .S T OV
a) p +' T" O +' U
N O
U C
Q)
Q)
Q p
C M rn p U- O p
C
O v p
— N H
u O r Q) p p vpi
10 C
Q m Q) O ro H C N Y
+�+
u
L dA
4� 3
Q to Y n n i to
-O
Q+ p +C+
Vf Q) L
N
fuC
O
� u-)i
Q1 p L) +' Q1 ro m
3 ro -O Q1 S
U
a'+J '°
M� Q C V1
i i L Q1
cn
w Q) m
O> Q M V i v° L> O
Q) 00 Q (o
To
i
i d
O
7 -°
E-
C
Q) CO L) U u o v �,
L_0 O O Q) L m
L— i —_
Q
O "O
C
c c
N p
M v
v co C)-a Q) c 0 a .O L O
O Q 3
s O L N
i.
LC
m
-O
•L N
0 C C C O ++ f6
V 6
Q) L
Q
t 7
i
Q!
z f6
N
Q. N
0 N O C O ++ p
O! E C
T 'O Q-
H V
4- O
O
E
0)
ar N
v
J Ji Q) xQ
z c LL ry E Q x Ou
L O Z E m
U t
ri ,� +' L
N
'N
(7
41 C
C
n L
Q O O
u( _° OA
4C •> U �O -p c Q) Q) •`n c
L ° ro v�i
Q L L a
O
.�
v N C c
a j
U
I
Z 4
Qc) o c U N p
4w CU -O "= •Q E Q1 N
Q)
a� ^� o
t4v v
`tit
'9 &j en � Q) u c � om Q-
� c
y
_
-
C
3 ro
:ti 60uO 1 L (u+� N
i E Q) 'U N Q
= Q)- Q) 0D
L V1
♦1
Q.
Q. (7
41 4 L
QI Q-a c t
QJ L x C L +�+ Q) u p
a.. .x
= C
i
Q
m
!'
O
�i -0 •LM
Q) Ma 4-1L Q) U
Q)M M c
ro a)
O
QJ
o
Q)
a
3 +� Ln
NO Q-
_
Ln
Q ,c
o f o Q) o v Q"� m3°
o M
cu
OU
(U
E)v
E)
�
Q) QV)
W OL to C .'n +L+ -O Z °
Q) U- Q) f° o
a)Q C Q)
1 c
�--I
z
.4 m L
a Q) .� o v
.► E O 0A
Q)
L
M
LL
O O
O Z v C iC
v Q Ln
z
ti N v
N Q m v� O a �_ �
d a°
'O
O
ey O C
ty O Q) pp v 0 L L ro U
ty
t—
z
(D
z a ro
N
Z Q ro LZ E Q 4O > ran C (n
Q) Q) Q)
z -a -6
LnE
M y
C: U
O ra
Q
U E
a/ —
N �
Y
Cv
C
c
O
W
O
c
O
m
ra
v U
u a)
QC:
U
a)
O i
D
0 a) v
O C �: vi E
U
CC O u a)
Q)
O d 6
C
L Q a)
on O Q
ai
o o
— O '+� u >
U
m -0 a) DO
'f = H 0 0- 4-1
C
4O 0- c n3 O
O 04� O Q N U
a) U 0
v +, O- Z i O
N +�, w ' Uz Q C
0 z c w
Q) a) S a) d pLI) Ln
> Z
) +, a) '— C n3 0 m
V C G E nj Ln
p k.0
0 ^ 0 a) 1-0 U C ()
in 41
3 ~ O O CO a) M
N U +� C a a, _ Z
MO X O= m O O U_
a, a N c > > a O 0
O O- o O o a
t L 0 +, a� i
() 3 a)=_ Ln nz n3 a,
LnV U w C C U C
-0 O *' Lo ra CL
vi 0'V)
i
,j�
'Q v' v v 6oa) a) a) a)C
00 O o VVV) Q ;6 -0 0.o
c c c c
i V
Q) O
wl Q C C - - ` = = U
a)O a) N .� o
C +, E U C C C C Cc
Ui O
O +O, (7 c> C U U u U U
>Q
t� `ai
+O a) aJ O v > i
to 4-1j C (B Z Q) vUi L _0 hOiA
a) N C C O a a) C (�
tCo E +, ut C Cp Q) 'U vi E C �' O W ai
O
v ca v � o E c v Ln °� 3 , E
L n n3 v O a) i Q i
O O U > +, O z > n3 O O
(a •� .� Cam ' VI t Q) f6 (B 4-1 -a > i
C O vl m X C C +� > cv a) ++ a) Q- a) N a) OU
C .O `n a) a) O O 2 *' n3 •�-^
u Ln
_ _ _O O O
u a) O to - nz ?� O Ln O C O +' �' +' C a) J
Co n� C a O O C Q i D i i V C Y N i Ul w
f0 �' 0 L a) E a) -0 O a) N O C � a) Z
i O d O E bC0 O aj .0 +�- Q) a) E O L1 C>
Q c N 'in C a) c 0 c+1 v O Q ,� O� c '7 +� Q
c i a) U 0 m X (31 — O aCi vi 6 Q) Q) OU urn t CO
c z —" 0 v v u a aJ a v a) a>i v n3 v Ln
N � 0 L s O v ra Q� c v v 0 U .� C i�
N O Ur E 0 3 0 +� co = O i i ca O n3 7 a1
.N ++ i OU a) 'n t N C Q) +, N O N-0 ` �' m N C a t
a) c6 c C O C �' a) a
O aa) a E 3 3 '� a' >' E a' o n +-� v
-0 a) vl E v v
a a cu O c o ..; v
L- Q a) C .%n pp c U fra -0 al Q) a) +�' a) c� M C N >, V1 C j a) O C v 0 v a) +, t t Z O 00 aJ
VI O O N +, a) -0 C a) a) U C C U O
Um = a,.� �J E :bQj "�� v n3 +' > Eta +� a
l0 t6 a i vt J w Ol 0 O +, +-� H O >- Ol C
O Q Z U a1 M 'r r- C .0 O .— "
75 ELN O L
M N a1 W v� N aJ m v*'i 0�1 O Q) M al C N Q N Q
a) ca N +� a1 Z z 0 Q Z i z N .� O cc
U °p n3 c `� N Q u a `� N +° N n
c6 v a) H v v E p N v N '0 ° c p M O O aa)) erg
H - z E� ra C7 z o-0 Z c m ca Ln Q Q Z C U� Z Q
c
w
.N
v �
� i
Ql �
L �
U 'N
� M N C
O
N
v
Q
Q �
m
�O a)
J l.fl O l.(1 l.fl >
W Ln l0 l0 I� �
U
Y
CQ
E
c
(U
E
c
O
w
O
c
O
m
ra
O2
u .E N t]A
N 'O 'a
0 n p0 O� a)'p
t
v) L L C N
ro v O
M 'a
a1 ro u X a) m
u
a) C O T N c
Ln O= C= 6 3
-0
> to a) a) 4� N
E O
�p •+, a) m o O �
a O N a)
-a a) U a)
} C°
O O ry
-P
rp
O E -O 401
4= aj Q= a)
C 4 �n p � L m T N 'a '�
O + v�
0 N U m O Q W
CCYJ�
Z Q OL 0
bn -0
L
vi
>,
C +� CU a)
n
°c
tn' O C
n
•° O •" rCo a) U r`a � O
L ° Q p _ N ro
Q c
N
c x o O oo 3 o c
L
'L
ra +' a _0 � Q 7 'tj co
X 'a o C 'O Q °
N
L
'++ O c` 0 a) 'C N
T c a i° v� T Q
Z
++
rn
V)
O
C C N a) a) in Ln O-a
^
Ln N
++ r6 L O U O C
(, �i' E O p �
r0
'VI
C
O .� v+' cO a
+' *.;, 0 a 0 N G y 4 r6
a
�n ro 41
N a) C s a) L �` X
O
O
(�
C
O
a)
>
O ro '� a' Z 7 cn
Q L a) j E
L a Q a) L Q— a)
+' > u s ro 'a
O
U
+'
vi
s
o Q a1 L u .L U P 0 O
N
� 0 O '� .T O O
lD
y�
`J
C
"� O V N m w c
'p a L O •�
Q '++ �
'p O C>
41 OL
�
z Z Co 0 'O hA 0--
C
z rb Id a) a) +u �
3 Z
d
C
O
N' +' 2 L C �n N
a) O a) Z
p L
nj p N i ra Q
v p a)
�p_p Q
u
Q N a LJ(
v ao •r
�
0 O
m _� } p u u
C u v a) c N to u
c•n Q) c c� L p
C p o T v r6 -a
D
Q
.�
_O .� O ZCU O- chi CO
O a .0 L E m Ln
N
i NLn w
a)� aJ t
OL
U C a) ra -a
a) E m c 7 *'
N
a) ate-+ V)C W
V) O N
O
a Q t a) mO_ a1 .� C
C
a) �,
c u -a N a u N
.Q
ro
_Q
+-+ L 1-0> O
a) O
-acu
c 3 o Z Ln o aTi
v u uo Q t t
aJ
aa) o
a) U c '- -0
IU
Ln -a c V) j, +' +' O
0 a
L N n n
a n a s 0
O-
Ln
a)
U •� a) a)
U a) •U a)
C
L LI) ° •> 0 O N
° a m C L L a)
a)
M
Q v N •u .� 4)
Q C O
3 U .`pn
N ro
Ln
c w+� C
0)vi E
c '-P -0o M t
o
w Z t t °- c () +�
ai u a) r' +� a) a
a)
41 E
O
+�
O v)Le) U Q > C
a
U f6 r6 r6 r6 > M (.0
0 0 a) s L a) a) c
U U N I� O G
O
U
C
In Ln
++ L L
O
i
a) a;
C
v
U.)
toC
(U L
O
0 Q to
0 N
'a
c
ro
•a-=
u
C
r6 c
C a)
�
r6 +'
> O a) C
O
w m c
u
y
a) u
C
° O
.0
_
O
a,
a
° C v�i •F
Z
°
i
>
Z
a) .o
+'
v
4 °
°
°
s
a)
L o
o c
X +,
+`
�
o
f
v_�
r�'v y
v 4
+-M
°' v
-a -a
u O
c
'a
c
ZA
m ,u
L m
u
r0
C p 0
L
O L v
cu
o
'n
f6
i O
L
- U u
w° a
ra
c
O a
a)
L ro
�
o Fa x
v s
v
E
°
'aa�+
•u Op N
C ()
N
Gam)
C
a)
VI
M
a) °
c
u
a
u
N
O
II^^
V
c
u o
^� m
U C Ga
Q rti �_
L
L
0 N
�.
r
r6
°-
O T X a)
a''
i E -a
C
U f0
N p
LL a) t
0 a
O
u
w
U
y a
ro
ai
vi ° co
3 a)
Q L
of
O
y
d
.Q
u
w
= m in
-�
N •+�
u
V
N
O_
ro-
tn L a)
U C m m
X
i
Q
00 O
+'
N u
O
L° to
N }' 4-
O
GJ
a) U
N
ro =3
Z Z u 0
a)
(1)
N
v
O
Vf 'O
L
p
c °
m •p c +
ro �
v)
a.
-a a) v
p
a
o T
.a.
E a o
Ln
o
Z
ti.�
Z
4-1
o.Q-
tz cu u_a
-ffi
ti
o v vi v
Z c ro t
(7
Z m
V7 E
O w
o
O m
o a
m
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Cumulative Impacts
The Project is consistent with applicable land use goals and policies. Although other changes inland use plans and regulations may have occurred with pasta nd present projects in the area and maybe necessary for individual future projects, such changes have been, and would be, required to demonstrate consistency with General Plan and other City policies such that no significant adverse cumulative impact has occurred or would occur from such changes. Given that the proposed Project would be consistent with the land use policies of the applicable plans, subject to the approval of development standard and incentive waivers allowed by density bonus law, the Project would not combine with any past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future projects to cause a significant adverse cumulative land use impact based on a conflict with a plan or policy. Any associated physical impacts are covered in the individual topic sections. It is also anticipated that regional growth would be subject to review for consistency with adopted land use plans and policies by the County of Orange, City of Newport Beach, and other cities in Orange County, in accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the State Zoning and Planning Law, and the State Subdivision MapAct, all of which requirefindings of plan and policy consistency prior to approval of entitlements for development. Therefore, no significant cumulative impacts associated plans and policies are anticipated. In addition, the contribution of the proposed Project to any such cumulative impacts would be less than significant because present and probable future projects are consistentwith applicable plans, policies, and regulations. The Project would not contribute to any cumulative impacts associated with plan or policy inconsistency.
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
General Plan policies related to land use have been identified in Table 3.10-1.
Standard Conditionsand Requirements
No conditions of approval or mitigation measures are required.
Conclusion
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to land use and planning or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regard to PRC Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding. Therefore, preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted. 140 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.11 Mineral Resources
Threshold (a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? General Plan Significance Determination: No Impact. The majority of the City is located with Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ)-1 and MRZ-3. MRZ-1 is defined as an area where available geologic information indicates there is little or no likelihood for presence of significant mineral resources and MRZ-3 is defined as an area containing known mineral occurrences of undetermined mineral significance. According tothe California Geologic Survey, the Citydoes not have any land classified as MRZ-2 which is an area underlain by significant mineral deposits orwith a high likely hood of such. Therefore, the General Plan Program EIR determined that implementation of the General Plan would not impact mineral resources that would be of value to the region and the residents of California.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The project site is located with MRZ-3 and does not contain mineral resources of significant value. The proposed Project would not have the potential impact any resources within MRZ-2, which is consistent with the General Plan Program EIR. The Project would not affect active oil wells located in the northwestern area ofthe City. No impact with regards to mineral resources of value tothe region and the residents of California would occur. Therefore, no new impacts or a substantial increase inthe severityof a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur.
Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of no impact.
Threshold (b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recoverysite delineated on a local general plan, specific plan orother land use plan?
General Plan Significance Determination: No Impact. The General Plan Program EIR states that there are no regional, State, or locally important mineral resource recovery sites in the City. Consequently, implementation of the General Plan would not substantially alter the projected production or consumption of mineral resources. No impact would occur.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The proposed Project would develop a residential development within an urbanized area of the City. The proposed Project would not remove any locallyor regionally important mineral resources from production or preclude access to important mineral resources. No impact to locally -important mineral resource recovery sites would occur. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program El R was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of no impact.
141 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed above, the proposed Project would not cause anew mineral impact to occur, nor an increase in theseverity of a mineral impact previously disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR. Implementation of the proposed Project would not alter the conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR analysis and would not result in a new or substantially more severe project -specific or cumulative mineral resources impact than those already analyzed.
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
General Plan policies related to mineral resources identified in the General Plan Program EIR to mitigate potential impacts to minerals resources are not applicable to the Project.
Standard Conditionsand Requirements
No conditions of approval or mitigation measures are required.
Conclusion
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to mineral resources or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regard to PRC Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding. Therefore, preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted. 142 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.12 Noise
Threshold (a) Would the project generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standardsofother agencies? General Plan Significance Determination: Significant and Unavoidable. The General Plan Program EIR identified that regional growth would create noise that would affect new and existing receptors. Most of this noise would be produced by increased traffic on local roads. Manyof the General Plan policies would reduce the impact. However, existing receptors would still be exposed to new noise levels in excess of standards, and this impact, even with the proposed General Plan policies, was found to be significant and unavoidable. The areas withthe greatest potential for exceeding noise standards are roadway segments where the 65 dBA CNEL noise contours extend beyond the roadway right-of-way. The exposure of existing land uses to noise levels in excess of City standards as a result of the future growth under the General Plan is considered a significant impact. With respect to temporary construction noise, the General Plan Program EIR found that construction noise is not subject to the noise standards in the Municipal Code when activities occur during limited hours of the day and days of the week. Existing and future construction noise levels at individual construction sites may not substantially differ but previously unexposed areas could experience new sources of construction noise. Both existing and future noise would be exempt from the City code and when construction noise occurs, impacts would be considered less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
Traffic Noise
Policy N 1.8 of the General Plan Noise Element requires the implementation of noise mitigation measures for existing sensitive uses when a significant noise impact is identified for new development impacting existing sensitive uses, as presented in Table 3.12-1, Incremental Noise Impact Criteria for Noise - Sensitive Uses.
Table 3.12-1: Incremental Noise Impact Criteria for Noise -Sensitive Uses (dBA CNEL) Existing Noise Exposure
Allowable Noise Exposure Increment
55 3
60 2
65 1
70 1
75 0
Source: City of Newport Beach General Plan, 2006.
Project -generated traffic noise was modeled as identified in Table 3.12-2, Existing and Project Traffic Noise, Table 3.12-3, Opening Yearand Project Traffic Noise, and Table 3.12-4, General Plan Buildout and Project Traffic Noise. The proposed Project would generate a minimal increase in vehicle trips, resulting in a minimal increase in traffic -generated noise levels. Therefore, buildout of the proposed Project is not anticipated to result in a substantial increase in traffic noise compared to what was previously analyzed in the General Plan Program EIR.
143 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Table 3.12-2: Existing and Project Traffic Noise
Existing
Existing Plus Project
Project
Change from
Existing
Significant
Roadway Segment
ADT dBACNELa
ADT
dBACNELa
Conditions
Impact?
I rvin a Ave n ue
South of Mesa Dr
30,600
66.8 30,600
66.8 0.0
No
South of Bristol St South
25,600 66.9
25,600
66.9 0.0
No
Campus Drive
North of Bristol St North
28,800
66.7 28,800
66.7 0.0
No
East of Von Karman Ave
10,600 61.9
10,600
61.9 0.0
No
MacArthur Boulevard
South of Birch St
18,200 66.6
18,300
66.6 0.0
No
Jamboree Road
North of Eastbluff/University Dr
50,200
71.1 50,300
71.1 0.0
No
North of Bison Ave
43,000 70.5
43,100
70.6 0.0
No
University Drive
East of Jamboree Rd
13,700 64.2
13,700
64.2 0.0
No
Birch Street
South of Orchard
8,400 61.0
8,400
61.0 0.0
No
Bristol Street
East of Birch St
13,180 62.8
13,400
62.9 0.1
No
ADT = average daily trips; dBA = A -weighted decibels; CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level a. Traffic noise levels are at 100 feet from the roadway centerline. The actual sound level at any receptor location is dependent upon such
factors as the source -to -receptor distance and the presence of intervening structures,
barriers, and topography.
Source: Based on traffic data provided by Ganddini Group., November 2021.
Refer to Appendix E for traffic noise modeling
assumptions and
results.
On -Site Noise
Future residents at the project site would be exposed to mobile traffic noise along SR-73 and Bristol Street.
Table 3.12-3 shows that the loudest traffic noise levels adjacent to the project site would be 63.1 dBA.
General Plan Policy N 1.2 requires developments that are located in areas projected to be exposed to a CNEL of 60 dBA or higher, to determine the level of exterior or interior noise attenuation needed to attain an acceptable noise exposure level and the feasibility of such mitigation when other planning considerations aretaken into account.
General Plan Policy N 2.1 requires that proposed noise -sensitive uses in areas of 60 dBA and greater, as determined the analyses stipulated by Policy N 1.1, demonstrate that they meet interior and exterior noise levels. General Plan Policy N 1.1 requires that all proposed Projects are compatible with the noise environment through use of Noise Element Table N2 and enforce the interior and exterior noise standards shown in Noise Element Table N3. Noise Element Table N2 identifies a "Clearly Compatible" exterior noise standard of 65 dBA for residences in mixed use areas. Land uses that are clearly compatible are satisfactory for buildings of normal conventional construction without any special noise insulation requirements. The project site is in a Mixed -Use District, and the General Plan land use category for the project site is "Mixed Use Horizontal (MU-H2)."
144 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Noise Element Table N3 identifies a daytime interior noise standard of 45 dBA and a nighttime interior noise standard of 40 dBA. According to the U.S. EPA (Protective Noise Levels, November 1978), typical building construction reduces noise levels by 25 dBA with the windows closed. Therefore, the worst -case exterior interior noise levels would be reduced to 39.3 dBA, which is below the City's 45 dBA daytime interior noise standard and the 40 dBA nighttime interior noise standard. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Table 3.12-3: Opening Year and Project Traffic Noise
Opening Year
Project
Opening Year
Plus Project
Change from
Existing
Significant
Roadway Segment
ADT dBACNELa
ADT dBACNELa
Conditions
Impact?
I rvin a Avenue
South of Mesa Dr
32,500
67.1 32,500
67.1 0.0
No
South of Bristol St South
27,200 67.2
27,200 67.2
0.0 No
Campus Drive
North of Bristol St North
29,000
66.7 29,000
66.7 0.0
No
East of Von Karman Ave
10,700 62.0
10,700 62.0
0.0 No
MacArthur Boulevard
South of Birch St
19,800 67.0
19,900 67.0
0.0 No
Jamboree Road
North of Eastbluff/University Dr
54,600
71.5 54,700
71.5 0.0
No
North of Bison Ave
47,100 70.9
47,200 70.9
0.0 No
University Drive
East of Jamboree Rd
13,800 64.3
13,800 64.3
0.0 No
Birch Street
South of Orchard
8,900 61.2
8,900 61.2
0.0 No
Bristol Street North
East of Birch St
14,102 63.1
14,258 63.1
0.0 No
ADT = average daily trips; dBA = A -weighted decibels; CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level
a. Traffic noise levels are at 100 feet from
the roadway centerline. The actual sound level at any receptor location is dependent upon such
factors as the source -to -receptor distance
and the presence of intervening
structures, barriers, and topography.
Source: Based on traffic data provided by Ganddini Group., November 2021. Refer to Appendix E for traffic noise modeling assumptions and
results.
145 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Table 3.12-4: General Plan Buildout and Project Traffic Noise General Plan Buildout
General Plan Buildout
Project
(No Project)
(With Project)
Change
from
Existing
Significant
Roadway Segment
ADT dBACNELa
ADT dBACNELa
Conditions
Impact?
Irvine Avenue
South of Mesa Dr
48,700
68.9 48,700
68.9 0.0
No
South of Bristol St South
48,700 69.7
48,700 69.7
0.0 No
Campus Drive
North of Bristol St North
49,600
69.0 49,600
69.0 0.0
No
East of Von Karman Ave
25,600 65.8
25,600 65.8
0.0 No
MacArthur Boulevard
South of Birch St
27,700 68.4
27,700 68.4
0.0 No
Jamboree Road
North of Eastbluff/University Dr
46,400
70.8 46,400
70.8 0.0
No
North of Bison Ave
11,100 64.7
11,100 64.7
0.0 No
University Drive
East of Jamboree Rd
16,800 65.1
16,800 65.1
0.0 No
Birch Street
South of Orchard
46,200 68.4
46,200 68.4
0.0 No
Bristol Street
East of Birch St
18,540 64.3
18,636 64.3
0.0 No
ADT = average daily trips; dBA = A -weighted decibels; CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level
a. Traffic noise levels are at 100 feet from the roadway centerline. The actual sound level at any receptor
location is dependent
upon such
factors as the source -to -receptor distance and the presence of intervening structures, barriers, and topography.
Source: Based on traffic data provided by Ganddini Group., November 2021.
Refer to Appendix E for traffic
noise modeling
assumptions and
results.
Stationary Noise
The proposed Project is consistent with the existing land use designation of MU-112. The site is currently an office building with a surface parking lot uses. Stationary noise sources associated with these uses include rooftop mechanical equipment such as HVAC equipment and parking lot. The proposed Project would not introduce newtypes of noise sources that were not already anticipated underthe existing land use designation. In general, stationary noise sources associated with the proposed residential uses are similartoor less thanthe office uses (e.g., HVAC equipment and group conversations). Future development would be subject to the City's exterior noise standards in the Municipal Code, as set forth in SC N-1.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
Construction Noise
The proposed Project is consistent with the existing land use designation of MU-H2. Therefore, the proposed Project would accommodate land uses that would require similar construction processes and intensities. Certain land uses are particularly sensitive to noise and vibration. These uses include residential, schools, libraries, churches, nursing homes, hospitals, hotels,and open space/recreation areas where quiet environments are necessary for enjoyment, public health, and safety. Commercial and 146 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
industrial uses are genera Ilynot considered noise and vibration sensitive unless noise and vibration would interfere with normal operations and business activities. The nearest existing sensitive receptor to the project site is a single-family residences located approximately 630 feet southwest of the project site (south of Bristol Street South). The closest structure to the project site boundary is an office building located approximately 120 feet to the northwest.
Project construction is anticipated to commence in the first quarter of 2023 and conclude in the second quarter of 2025. Construction activities would include demolition, excavation, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Such activities may require dozers, concrete/ industrial saws, and excavators during demolition; dozers and tractors during site preparation; trenching equipment during trenching and utilities; graders, dozers, tractors, scrapers, and excavators during grading; cranes, forklifts, generators, tractors, and welders during building construction; pavers, rollers, and paving equipment during paving; and aircompressors during architectural coating.
As a conservative estimate, short-term construction noise (i.e., the construction activity with highest number of equipment used during each sub -phase) was modeled using the FHWA's Roadway Construction Noise Model (FHWA-HEP-05-054) (January 2006). The noise levels calculated in Table 3.12-5, Project Construction Noise Levels, show estimated exterior construction noise at the closest receptors.
Table 3.12-5: Project Construction Noise Levels
Receptor Location
Worst Case
Modeled Exterior
Noise
Construction
Distance
Noise Level
Threshold
Phase
Land Use
Direction
(feet)a
(dBA Leq)
(dBA LeJb
Exceeded?
Demolition
Residential
Southwest
800
63.3 80
No
Site Preparation
Residential
Southwest
800
60.5 80
No
Grading
Residential
Southwest
800
61.8 80
No
Construction
Residential
Southwest
800
61.5 80
No
Paving
Residential
Southwest
800
62.8 80
No
Architectural
Residential
Southwest
800
49.6 80
No
Coating
a. Per FTA Guidance (FederalTransit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manua1, 2018)the equipment distance is assumed at the center of the project site.
b. Threshold from the Feder alTransitAdministration, TransitNoise and Vibration Impact Assess mentManua1, 2018.
Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model, 2006. Refer to Appendix A for noise modeling results.
The City does not have quantitative standards for construction noise levels. Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 10.28.040(A) states that "No person shall, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition, painting, plastering or any other related building activity, operate any tool, equipment or machine in a mannerwhich produces loud noise that disturbs, orcould disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, unless authorized to do so in accordance with subsection (B) of this section."
As applicable to the proposed Project, Municipal Code Section 10.28.040(B) states that the provisions of Section 10.28.040(a) do not apply to those activities between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM on any weekday that is not a federal holiday, and between the hours of 8:OOAM and 6:00 PM on Saturdays. The permitted hours of construction are in recognition that construction activities undertaken during daytime 147 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
hours area typical part of living in an urban environment and do not cause a significant impact. However, this analysis conservatively uses the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) threshold of 80 dBA (8-hour Leq) for residential uses to evaluate construction noise impacts.18 Actual construction -related noise activities are expected to be lower than the conservative levels described above and would cease upon completion of construction. Due to the variability of construction activities and equipment for the Project, overall construction noise levels would be intermittent and would fluctuate over time. These assumptions represent the worst -case noise scenario because construction activities would typically be spread out throughout the project site, and thus some equipment would be farther away from the affected receptors. In addition, the noise modeling assumes that construction noise is constant, when, in fact, construction activities and associated noise levels would fluctuate and generally be brief and sporadic, depending on the type, intensity, and location of construction activities. It is also noted that Project construction equipment would be equipped with functioning mufflers as mandated by the state, and construction would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated or confined in the areas closest to sensitive receptors.
Potential construction noise related to this use would be similarto noise as addressed in the General Plan Program EIR and would not represent a new impact. Construction noise would be temporary in nature and cease upon Project completion.
Construction noise would be subject to General Plan Policy N 4.6, which would require enforcement of the noise ordinance limits and hours in the City's Municipal Code. Since the Project's construction noise levels would not substantially differ from the assumptions of the General Plan Program EIR, construction noise impacts with implementation of the proposed Project would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in any new adverse impacts or increasethe severityof any previously identified noise impacts. No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impact the prior finding under this threshold.
Threshold (b) Would the project generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
General Plan Significance Determination: Significant and Unavoidable. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that vibrations associated with construction activities would impact existing buildings and their occupants ifthey are located close enoughtothe construction sites. Vibration levels would be problematic if sensitive uses were located within about 100feet of potential project construction sites, where sensitive receptors (e.g., residents, school children) would experience vibration levels that exceed the FTA's vibration impact threshold of 72 VdB. The only mitigation that could eliminate the vibration impact is to distance construction and existing sensitive receptors by approximately 150 feet. The General Plan Program EIR noted that there are no mitigation measures available that would ensurethatthe threshold would not be exceeded in all cases and no General Plan policies that would mitigate the vibration impact.
Under these circumstances, impacts would be significant and unavoidable.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; change from previous analysis.
18 Federa I Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, Table 7-2, Page 179, September 2018. 148 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Increases in groundborne vibration levels attributable to the proposed Project would be primarily associated with construction -related activities. Construction on the project site would have the potential to result in varying degrees of temporarygroundborne vibration, depending on the specific construction equipment used and the operations involved. Ground vibration generated by construction equipment spreads through the ground and diminishes in magnitude with increases in distance. The effect on buildings located in the vicinity of the construction site often varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and construction characteristics of the receiver building(s). The results from vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibration at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Groundborne vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that damage structures.
Construction -related ground vibration is normally associated with impact equipment such as pile drivers, jackhammers, and the operation of some heavy-duty construction equipment, such as dozers and trucks.
Vibration decreases rapidlywith distance.
The FTA has published standard vibration velocities for construction equipment operations. In general, depending on the building category of the nearest buildings adjacent to the potential pile driving area, the potential construction vibration damage criteria vary. For example, for a building that is constructed with reinforced concrete with no plaster, the FTA guidelines show that a vibration level of up to 0.50 inch per second (in/sec) peak particle velocity (PPV) is considered safe and would not result in any construction vibration damage. The FTA architectural damage criterion for continuous vibrations for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings (i.e., 0.20 inch/second) appears to be conservative. The types of construction vibration impact include human annoyance and building damage. Human annoyance occurs when construction vibration rises significantly above the threshold of human perception for extended periods of time. Building damage can be cosmetic or structural. Ordinary buildings that are not particularly fragile would not experience any cosmetic damage (e.g., plaster cracks) at distances beyond 30 feet. This distance can vary substantially depending on the soil composition and underground geological layer between vibration source and receiver. In addition, not all buildings respond similarly to vibration generated by construction equipment. The City of Newport Beach does not provide numerical vibration standards for construction activities. Therefore, this impact discussion uses FTA standard of
0.20 inch/second PPV with respect to the prevention of structural damage for normal buildings and human annoyance.
Table 3.12-6, Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels, identifies vibration levels feet for typical construction equipment. The nearest structure to any of the construction activities is an office building located approximately 120 feet to the northwest, which is more than the 100-foot buffer identified in the General Plan Program EIR. Based on FTA data, vibration velocities from typical heavy construction equipment operations that would be used during Project construction would range from 0.003 to 0.089 inch/second PPV at 25 feet and 0.0003 to 0.0085 inch/second PPV at nearest structure which is located 120 feet northwest of the project site boundary. It is also acknowledged that construction activities would occur throughout the project site and would not be concentrated at the point closest to the nearest structure. Vibration from construction activities experienced at the nearest building would be below the
0.20 inch/second PPV significance threshold. As noted above, the 0.20 inch/second PPV threshold is conservative because the construction vibration damage criteria are for non -engineered timber and masonry buildings. Buildings would be better represented by the 0.50 inch/second PPV significance threshold (construction vibration damage criteria for a reinforced concrete, steel or timber buildings). 149 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Once operational, the Project would not be a source of groundborne vibration. Because construction equipment vibration levels would be below the significance thresholds, impacts would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in any new adverse impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts related to vibration. No new information of substantial importancethat was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impact the prior finding under this threshold.
Table 3.12-6: Typical Construction Equipment Vibration Levels Equipment Type
Peak Particle Velocityat 25 Feet
(inches per second)
Peak Particle Velocityat 120
Feet (inches per second)a
Large Bulldozer
0.089
0.0085
Caisson Drilling
0.089
0.0085
Loaded Trucks
0.076
0.0072
Jackhammer
0.035
0.0033
Small Bulldozer/Tractor
0.003
0.0003
a. Calculated using the following formula: PPV equip = PPV,ef x (25/D)'', where: PPV (equip) = the peak particle velocity in inch per second of the equipment adjusted for the distance; PPVr,f = the reference vibration level in inch per second from Table 7-4 of the FTA Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual (2018); D=the distance from the equipment to the receiver.
Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual, 2018.
Threshold (c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the projectexpose people residingor working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that residential development that occurs outside the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour for John Wayne Airport would not exceed allowable exterior noise levels for a residential area. Impacts would be less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
The Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) of Orange County adopted the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP), amended April 17, 2008, that included John Wayne Airport. The AELUP is a land use compatibility plan that is intended, in part, to protect the public from adverse effects of aircraft noise. The proposed Project is within the "airport influence area" defined by the AELUP19. John Wayne Airport is approximately
0.60-mile northwest of the project site. The AELUP shows the project site is outside of the 65 dBA CNEL contour. Additionally, General Plan Policy N 1.3 and SC N-3 require residential developments within the Airport Area demonstrate that the design of the structure will adequately isolate noise between adjacent uses and units (common floor/ceilings) in accordance with the California Building Code and that interior noise levels would achieve 45 dBA CNEL or less. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in any new adverse impacts or increasethe severityof any previously identified impacts related to aircraft noise. No new information of substantial importance that was not 19 Airport Land Use Commission, Airport Environs, Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport. Available at https://files.ocair.com/media/2021- 02/JWA AELUP-April-17-2008.pdf?Versionld=cBObyJidad90uY5im70ai5aWaT1FS.vD. Accessed November 18, 2021. 150 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EI R was certified that would impact the prior finding under this threshold.
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed above, all construction and operational noise impacts would be less than significant.
Construction noise impacts are by nature localized. The distance of separation among the proposed Project and other cumulative projects would be such that the temporary noise and vibration effects of the proposed Project would not be compounded or increased by similar noise or vibration effects from other cumulative projects. There are currently no known projects that would be under construction during the same time period within 0.25 mile of the project site. As discussed above, operational noise caused by the proposed Project would be less than significant. Due to site distance and these intervening land uses, cumulative stationary noise impacts would not occur. No known past, present, or reasonably foreseeable projects would compound or increase the operational noise levels generated by the Project.
Therefore, cumulative impacts relative totemporary and permanent noisegeneration associated with the proposed Project would be less than significant.
As discussed above, the proposed Project would not cause a new noise impact to occur, nor an increase in the severityof a noise impact previously disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR. Implementation of the proposed Project would not alterthe conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR ana lysis and would not result in a new or substantially more severe project -specific or cumulative noise or vibration impact than those already analyzed.
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
The following policies are applicable to the proposed Project and would be made conditions of approval.
N 1.1 Field Surveys for New Development. Require that all proposed projects are compatible with the noise environment through use of Table N2, and enforce the interiorand exterior noisestandards shown in Table N3. Proposed projects located in areas projected to be exposed to a CNELof60 dBA and higher, as shown on Figure N5, shall (a) conduct a field survey to determine the existing levels of noise exposure and (b) project the levels that would result from the Plan's projected traffic increases as may be modified from those depicted on Figure N5 byexisting building locations, topography, and traffic speed. Based on these findings, require that the project meet interior and exterior noise standards.
■ N 1.4New Developmentsin UrbanAreas. Requires that a pplica nts of residential portions of mixed - use projects and high -density residential developments in urban areas (such as the AirportArea and Newport Center) demonstratethatthe design ofthe structure will adequately isolate noise between adjacent uses and units (common floor/ceilings) in accordance with the California BuildingCode. ■ N 2.1 NewDevelopment. Requirethat proposed noise -sensitive uses in areas of 60 dBA and greater, as determined the analyses stipulated by Policy N1.1, demonstrate that they meet interior and exterior noise levels.
■ N 2.2- Design ofSensitive Land Uses: Requirethe use of walls, berms, and interior noise insulation, double -paned windows, or other noise mitigation measures, as appropriate, in the design of new 151 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
resident ia I or other new noise -sensitive land uses that area dja cent to major roads. Application of the Noise Standards in Table N3 of the Noise Element shall govern this requirement. ■ N 3.1- New Development: Ensure new development is compatible with the noise environment by using airport noise contours no largerthan those contained in the 1985 JWA Master Plan, as guides to future planning and development decisions.
■ N 3.2 - Residential Development: Require that residential development in the Airport Area be located outside of the 65 dBA CNEL noisecontour no largerthan shown in the 1985 JWAMaster Plan and require residential developers to notify prospective purchasers or tenants of aircraft overflight and noise.
■ N 4.1- Stationary Noise Sources: Enforce interior and exterior noise standards outlined in Table N3 of the Noise Element and in the C'Ws Municipal Code to ensure that sensitive noise receptors are not exposed to excessive noise levelsfrom stationary noise sources, such as heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment.
■ N 4.6 - Maintenance or Construction Activities: Require the enforcement of the Noise Ordinance noise limits and limits hours of maintenance or construction activity in or adjacent to residential areas, including noise that results from in -home hobbyor work -related activities. ■ LU 6.15.3 -Airport Compatibility: Require that all development be constructed in conformancewith the height restrictions set forth by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77, and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics, and that residential development be located outside ofthe 65 dBACNEL noise contour specified bythe 1985JWA Master Plan. ■ LU 6.15.15-Aircraft Notification: Require thatall neighborhood parks be posted with a notification to users regarding proximityto John Wayne Airport and aircraft overflight and noise.
Standard Conditionsand Requirements
SC N-1 To ensure compliance with Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 10.28.040, grading and construction plans shall include a note indicating that loud noise -generating project construction activities (as defined in Section 10.28.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code) shall take place between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM on weekdays that are not federal holidays and from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM on Saturdays in any area of the City that is not designated as a high -density area. Loud, noise -generating construction activities are prohibited outside of these hours and on Sundays and federal holidays.
SC N-2 Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units shall be designed and installed in accordance with Section 10.26.045 ofthe Newport Beach Municipal Code, whichspecifies the maximum noise levels for new HVAC installations and associated conditions. All mechanical equipment shall be screenedfrom view of adjacent properties and adjacent public streets, as authorized bya Site Development Review Permit.
SC N-3 Consistent with General Plan Policy N 1.4, all residential units shall be designed to ensure that interior noise levels in habitable rooms from exterior sources (including aircraft and vehicles on adjacent roadways) shall not exceed 45 dBA CNEL. This mitigation measure complies with the applicable sections of the California Building Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations). Prior to granting of a building permit, the Applicant shall 152 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
submit to the City of Newport Beach Community Development Department for review and approval architectural plans and an accompanying noise study that demonstrates that interior noise levels in the habitable rooms of residential units would be 45 dBA CNEL or less. Where closed windows are required to achieve the 45 dBA CNEL limit, Project plans and specifications shall include ventilation as required by the California Building Code.
Conclusions
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to noise or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regardto PRC Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at thetime the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of less than significant with mitigation. Therefore, preparationof a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted. 153 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.13 Population and Housing
Threshold (a) Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure?
General Plan Significance Determination: Significant Unavoidable Impact. The General Plan Program EIR assumed that General Plan buildout would result in an increase the number of dwelling units by 14,215 units (approximately 12,515 multi -family units and approximately 1,700single-family units), for a total of 54,394 units. Using a persons per household rate of 2.19, the General Plan Program EIR assumed thatthe 14,215 residential units would result in a population increase of approximately 31,131 residents.
This increase would result in a total population of 103,753 persons at General Plan buildout.
The increase in residential units and the associated increase in population identified in the General Plan would exceed SCAG projections. The number of households in the City projected by SCAG by 2030 was 43,100 units, while the number of dwelling units under the General Plan was 54,394 units. The SCAG projected population was 94,167 residents by2030, while the population resultingfrom the General Plan buildout would be approximatelyl0 percent higher, or 103,753 residents. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that since residential growth would substantially increase population growth within the City (by approximately 43 percent over 2002 population, and approximately 10 percent higher than existing SCAG projections), impacts on population growth would be considered significant. It was noted that the estimated population increase represented a conservative, worst -case scenario because it assumed that all allowed units would be built. Additionally, this estimate assumed that all residences in the City would be occupied. The Citytypically has a substantially higher vacancy rate than that of the County due to a higher percentage of vacation properties (seasonal housing).
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less than significant impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
The proposed Project would allow for the development of multi -family apartment building units with 193 units, inclusive of 39 density bonus units. Assuming 2.19 persons per unit, the proposed Project would have a residential population of 423 persons. This increase in residential units and population represents approximately 1.5 percent of the growth anticipated under the General Plan. It is important to note that the General Plan Program EIR addressed the introduction of 4,300 multi -family residential units into the Airport Area; the adopted General Plan includes 2,200 multi -family units.
Project implementation would make progress on the City's housing goals and be consistent with projected growth in the City based on SCAG's growth forecasts. The City's 6th Cycle (2021-2029) RHNA allocation is 4,845 housing units: 1,050 moderate -income units, 1,409 above moderate -income units, 1,456 very low-income units, and 930 low-income units. Additionally, the Project does not include the extension of roads or other infrastructure to unserved areas, which could induce indirect growth. Therefore, the Project would not induce substantial unplanned population growth in the City. No significant impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. The proposed Project would cause neither a new impact to occur nor an increase in the severity of an impact previously disclosed. As such, no further analysis is required.
154 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Threshold (b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
General Plan Significance Determination: No Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that development would occur primarily by intensifying current land uses, and through the conversion of land uses of economically underperforming and obsolete development. No substantial demolition of residential uses was proposed in the General Plan. There was an allowance for the loss of ten single-family residential units in the West Newport Mesa subarea, onlyifthese units are sold voluntarily by the owners.
These properties could be converted to commercial uses. However, West Newport Mesa would also gain 1,070 multi -family residential units, which would be consistent with Policy LU 6.6.2, which promotes the development of a mix of residential types and building scales within the subarea. Because the General Plan does not propose uses that would displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people, no impact would occur.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The project site is currently developed with a two-story office building with surface parking. No existing residential uses are located on the site; therefore, Project implementation would not displace existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required. The proposed Project would cause neither a new impact to occur nor an increase in the severityof an impact previously disclosed. As such, no further analysis is required.
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed above, the proposed Project would not cause impact to population and housing to occur, nor an increase in the severity of any impacts previously disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR.
Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause either a new cumulative impact to occur, nor an increase in the severityof a cumulative impact previously disclosed.
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
The Cityof Newport Beach General Plan Housing Element forthe 5t" Cycle planning period includes policies applicable to the proposed Project thatwould be made conditions of approval. ■ H 2.1- Encourage preservation of existing and provision of new housing affordable to extremely low-, verylow-, low-, and moderate -income households.
■ H 2.2 -Encourage the housing development industrytorespond toexisting andfuturehousingneeds of the community and to the demand for housing as perceived bythe industry. ■ H 2.3 - Approve, wherever feasible and appropriate, mixed residential and commercial use developments that improve the balance between housingandjobs.
Standard Conditionsand Reauirements
No standard conditions are applicable to the proposed Project. 155 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Conclusion
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to population and housing or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regard to PRC Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of less than significant with mitigation. Therefore, preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted.
156 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
3.14 Public Services
Threshold (a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire protection? General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR found that impacts to fire services from implementation of the General Plan were less than significant assuming compliance with applicable regulations and General Plan policies. The General Plan Program EIR addressed the introduction of residential uses into the Airport Area. As previously addressed in this Addendum, the General Plan evaluated the construction of 4,300 multi -family units in the Airport Area; however, the adopted General Plan includes 2,200 multi -family units. The General Plan Program EIR noted that new Airport Area residential uses would increase demands for 24-hour medical service, and that an increase in density by both infill development and the conversion of low-rise properties to mid -rise and high-rise development would necessitate the addition of a ladder truck company at the Santa Ana Heights Fire Station (Fire Station 7).
New development would be required to comply with all applicable federal, State, and local regulations governing the provision of fire protection services. General Plan Policy LU 3.2 requires that growth and development be coordinated with the provision of adequate infrastructure. The General Plan Program EIR analysis concludes that compliance with applicable regulations and policies identified in the General Plan would ensure impacts would be less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
The proposed Project would demolish an existing office building and develop a 193-unit, multi -family residential building with ground -level and two levels of subterranean parking. As discussed in Section 3.13, Population and Housing, the Project has the potential to generate 423 residents. This would incrementally increase the demand for service from the Newport Beach Fire Department (Fire Department), as well as potentially increase the Fire Department's response time to the project site.
Consistentwith the findings of the General Plan Program EIR, the proposed Project would incrementally increase the Fire Department's demand for emergency medical services provided by the Fire Department.
At the time of preparation of the General Plan Program EIR, it was forecasted that an additional ladder truck company would be needed at Fire Station 7. Because of changes in technology, building codes, and ongoing review of the current needs of the Fire Department, Fire Station 7 now requires a rescue ambulance with patient transport and advanced life support (ALS) capabilities instead of a ladder truck company without the need for new or expa nded facilities. Fire Station 7 has the physical ca pacity to house a paramedic rescue ambulance unit and would be able to address the additional service demand. In addition to the ambulance unit and its appurtenant equipment, the paramedic rescue ambulance unit requires six firefighters that are cross -trained as paramedics to ensure the unit is available 24 hours a day.
General Plan Policy LU 2.8 and Policy LU 6.1.1 require that land uses can be adequately supported by transportation and utility infrastructure and by public services. Implementation of SC PS-2 would ensure appropriate levels of service to the Airport Area.
157 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Given the proximity of the project site to Fire Station 7, Santa Ana Heights Fire Station (1.8 mile), and with implementation of SCs PS-1 and PS-2, the Fire Department would continue to maintain its service response goals and provide adequate staffing. Therefore, increases in service demand generated by the proposed Project would not have a substantial impact on the Fire Department's ability to adequately serve the project site. Therefore, the Project can be adequately served.
All new development would be required to comply with the existing International Fire Code and California Fire and Building Codes in the California Health and Safety Code. In addition, Chapter 10.48 of the Citys Municipal Code authorizes the Fire Marshal to regulate weed and rubbish abatement inthe Cityto reduce potential fire hazards from dry grasses, brush, garden refuse, etc. The Project would comply with the Fire Department's Fire Prevention Guidelines and Standards. Bycomplying with these federal, State, and local regulations, adequate fire and emergencysafety elements would be integrated into the Project, thereby reducing the riskfor fire hazards.
The Fire Department's operating budget is generated through tax revenues. Facilities, personnel, and equipment expansion and acquisition are tied to the City budget process and tax -base expansion.
Additionally, the Project would be subject to the City of Newport Beach Property Excise Tax (Municipal Code §3.12 et seq) established for public improvements and facilities associated with the City's Fire Department, public libraries, and public parks; see SC PS-1.
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to fire protection or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur.
Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of less than significant with mitigation.
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
The following policies are applicable to the proposed Project and would be made conditions of approval. ■ LU 2.8Adequate Infrastructure: Accommodate thetypes, densities, and mixof land uses thatcan be adequately supported by transportation and utility infrastructure (water, sewer, storm drainage, energy, and so on) and public services (schools, parks, libraries, seniors, youth, police, fire, and so on).
■ LU 6. 1. 1 Adequate Community Supporting Uses. Accommodate schools, government administrative and operational facilities, fire stations and police facilities, religious facilities, schools, cultural facilities, museums, interpretative centers, and hospitals to serve the needs of Newport Beach's residents and businesses.
Standard Conditionsand Requirements
SC PS-1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project, the Applicant shall pay the required Property Excise Tax to the City of Newport Beach, as set forth in its Municipal Code (§2.12 et seq.) for public improvements and facilities associated with the City of Newport Beach Fire Department, the City of Newport Beach Public Library, and City of Newport Beach public parks.
158 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
SC PS-2 In compliance with General Plan Policy LU 2.8 and Policy 6.1.1, prior to the issuance of a building permit for the residential structure, the Applicant, or any successors in interest, shall provide payment to the Cityof Newport Beach for the project's pro-rata share of the cost for purchasing and equipping a new rescue ambulance with patient transport and advanced life support (ALS) capabilities to be located at Santa Ana Heights Fire Station No. 7. This Standard Condition will be satisfied through the Applicant's payment of a Public Safety Fee.
Threshold (b) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police protection? General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR determined build out of the General Plan would have a less than significant impact on police services. In order to maintain acceptable levels of service, the General Plan includes policies to ensure adequate law enforcement is provided as the Cityexperiences future development (Policy LU 2.8). It was noted that to maintain the ratio of 1.7 officers per 1,000 residents (148 officers and 85,120 residents), the Newport Beach Police Department (Police Department) would have had to provide 53 additional officers by General Plan buildout. Maintaining the Police Department's ratio of 0.60 nonsworn personnel per sworn officer would result in the addition of 32 nonsworn personnel. The addition of 85 police personnel would require Police Department to expand police facilities. However, since Police Department did not have near -term plans for expansion of police facilities, staff, or equipment inventory, it was speculative to determine whether a new substation would be considered. All new development would be subject to the City's project -specific review. Therefore, the General Plan Program EIR found that impacts would be less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
Policy LU 2.8 of the General Plan provides that only land uses that can be adequately supported by the City's public services should be accommodated. Project implementation would introduce new residential uses and increase population in the City. Buildout of the proposed Project has the potential to generate 423 residents (see Section 4.11, Population and Housing). Based on the City's current ratio of officers to residents (1.6 officers per 1,000 residents), implementation of the Project would result in the demand for less than one additional police officer. It should be noted thatthe ratio of 1.6 officers per 1,000 residents is the current ratio but is not a ratio required by any City plan or policy.
The Police Department currently provides police services to the existing two-story office building for the existing office building tenants. The Police Department does not have any immediate or future plans to expand police facilities. Although the Project would incrementally increase demand for the City's police protection services, this demand would not require the construction of new facilities, nor would it require the expansion of existing facilities that would result in physical environmental impacts. Most new development will occur as infill development or redevelopment. Development on the project site has been considered in long-range planning efforts by the Police Department. 159 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
The Police Department's operating budget is generated through tax revenues, penalties, and service fees, and allowed government assistance. Facilities, personnel, and equipment expansion and acquisition are tied to the City budget process and tax -base expansion. Tax base expansion from development of the proposed Project would generate funding for the police protection services. Implementation of SC PS-3 related to site security and building and site safety design recommendations would ensure adequate police protection services can be provided to the project site. Therefore, the Project's impact on police protection services would be less than significant.
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
General Plan Policies LU 2.8 and 6.1.1 are applicable to the proposed Project.
Standard Conditionsand Requirements
SC PS-1 and thefollowing conditions are applicable.
SC PS-3 Prior to issuance of building permits, the City of Newport Beach Police Department shall review development plans for the incorporation of defensible space concepts to reduce demands on police services. Public safety planning recommendations shall be incorporated into the project plans. The Applicant shall prepare a list of project features and design components that demonstrate responsiveness to defensible space design concepts. The Police Department shall review and approve all defensible space design features incorporated into the project prior to initiating the building plan check process.
Threshold (c) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools? General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR analyzed school capacityin Newport -Mesa Unified School District, Santa Ana Unified School District, and Laguna Beach Unified School District. At buildout, the student population in the City was estimated to increase by approximately 6,230 students. The Airport Area is served by the Santa Ana Unified School District. The General Plan Program EIR projected that the Airport Area would experience an increase of 4,300 residential units and contribute approximately 1,883 students (of the total 6,230 students generated citywide under General Plan buildout). The General Plan Program EIR also noted that anticipated growth within the Irvine Business Complex (IBC) would have the potential to cumulatively impact Airport Area schools. The General Plan includes goals and policies to address capacity issues for NMUSD and SAUSD. Buildout would likely require construction of new school facilities; however, the Program EIR concluded that compliance with General Plan policies would reduce impacts to less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
Student generation rates are used by school districts to estimate the number of students generated by new development in order to determine whether existing school facilities would be adequate for future 160 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
student enrollment. As identified in Table 3.14-1, Student Generation using these student generation rates, the proposed 193 multi -family rental units would introduce approximately 84 students into the attendance area of Santa Ana Unified School District. The proposed Project would be served by Monroe Elementary, McFadden Intermediate, and Century High Schools. Based on the generation factors for the school district, the proposed Project would generate 37 elementary, 21 intermediate students, and 26 high school students.
Table 3.14-1: Student Generation
School Level
Multi -Family Rate
Numberof
Proposed Units
Students Potentially
Generated by the Project
Elementary School (K-5)
0.1937
193
37 Intermediate School (6-8)
0.1111
193
21 High School (9-12)
0.1427
193
26 Total
--
--
84 Source: Santa Ana General Plan Update Draft Program EIR, 2021.
School funding comes predominantly from federal, State, and local contributions, such as business and personal income taxes, sales tax, propertytax, etc. In accordance with Government Code Section 65995, the Santa Ana Unified School District requires all new development to pay fees to help offset the impacts to school facilities from new residential, commercial, and industrial development. The fees would be collected by school district at the time of issuance of building permits.
As stated in Government Code Section 65995(h), "The payment or satisfaction of a fee, charge, or other requirement levied or imposed ...are hereby deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act, or both, involving, but not limited to, the planning, use, or development of real property, or any change in governmental organization or reorganization ...on the provision of adequate school facilities." Payment of these fees would offset impacts from increased demand for school services associated with development of the proposed Project by providing an adequate financial base to construct and equip new and existing schools. Overall, Santa Ana Unified School District would be able to provide adequate school facilities for the projected student residents of the Project, and payment of impactfees would ensure that impacts are offset and remain less than significant.
Parks
Refer to Section 3.15, Recreation.
Other Public Facilities?
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded a less than significant impact to library facilities from implementation of the General Plan.
General Plan Policy LU 2.8 would help ensure that adequate library facilities are provided to the City's residents and that public services can adequately support new development. Compliance with policies contained in the General Plan would satisfy anyfuture demand for library facilities. Impacts associated with library services were less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
161 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
The Project is anticipated to include 423 residents, thereby incrementally increasing the demand for City library services. Although future Project residents would be expected to primarily use the Central Library and Crean Mariners Library, they would have access to all libraries within the City's library system. The existing library space, collections, and programs provided are considered adequate for the existing residents, and the proposed residential development would have a nominal impact on library services.
The City's librarysystem would continue receiving funding for library facilities and resources throughthe City's General Fund; the property excise tax per Chapter 3.12 of the City's Municipal Code as set forth in SC PS-1; and library activities, such as fines, facility rentals, passport photo/execution fees, and grants and private donations. Overall, Project impacts to library services would be less than significant. Therefore, impacts on library facilities and services would be less than significant.
Cumulative
As discussed above, the proposed Project would not cause a new public services impact to occur, nor an increase in the severity of any public services, recreation, or utilities impacts previously disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR, with implementation of the standard conditions discussed in this section.
Implementation of the proposed Project would not alterthe conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR analysis and would not result in a new or substantially more severe project -specific or cumulative public services impact than those already analyzed.
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
General Plan Policies LU 2.8 and 6.1.1 are applicable to library services.
Standard Conditions
SC PS-1 is applicable.
Conclusion
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to public services or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regard to PRC Section 21166 and State CECA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of less than significant with mitigation. Therefore, preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted.
162 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
3.15 Recreation
Threshold (a) Would the project increase the useof existing neighborhoodand regional parks orother recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
Threshold(b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment? General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR found that potential impacts on recreational facilities would be less than significant with the implementation of General Plan policies and requirements.
The General Plan Program EIR evaluated parks and recreational facilities on citywide basis and by service area. Twelve service areas were identified. The Airport Area is in Service Area 4—Santa Ana Heights/Airport Commercial. The General Plan Program EIR identified an existing park surplus (2006) for Service Area 4, noting that the two -acre Bayview Park and proximity to the Upper Bay recreation area provides recreational opportunities. A pocket park andjoint use community center project with the YMCA were planned for this area. However, the General Plan identified a shortfall in active playfields and that the existing park uses did not account for future demand associated with multi -family residences in the Airport Area.
The General Plan Program EIR found that there would be a greater possibilityfor physical deterioration of recreational facilities because of the introduction of multi -family residential development into the Airport Area. Prior to the adoption of the 2006 General Plan Update, there were no residential units in or permitted by the General Plan in the Airport Area. The General Plan Program EIR noted that new Airport Area residents would most likely use Bonita Canyon Sports Park stating "However, this park is already being fully utilized, and the increased usage resulting from the increase in population could contribute to this facility's physical deterioration." It was noted that the policies under General Plan Goal R 2 would help ensure that existing parks and recreation facilities are maintained and preserved. Compliance with General Plan Policy R 2.1 would maintain existing park facilities, thereby reducing impacts related to deterioration.
With respectto the maintenance at preservation of existing parks and recreation facilities (General Plan Goal R 2), General Plan Policy R 2.1 states:
Policy R 2.1. Use funding from the City's Park Dedication Fee Ordinance to enhance existing parks and recreational facilities.
For residential development in the Airport Area, the General Plan Program EIR concludes that with implementation of General Plan Policy R 2.1, impacts related to deterioration of parks and recreation facilities in the Airport Area would be less than significant.
It is important to note that both the General Plan Program EIR and the General Plan cross referencethe Park Dedication Fee Ordinance to the mandates of the Quimby Act, which only apply to residential subdivisions. The Park Dedication Fee would therefore have been applicable to all of the multi -family units in the Airport Area based on the evaluation of 4,300 units in the General Plan Program EIR or 2,200 units adopted in the General Plan only if the residential developments include a subdivision (mosttypically for 150 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
for -sale residential). However, if any or all of the residential units do not require a subdivision, which is typically the casefor for -rent residential developments, thefee would not apply.
In additional to compliance with General Plan Policy R 2.1 to mitigate impacts to existing park facilities, the General Plan places additional park and recreational requirements on residential villages inthe Airport Area. Compliance with General Plan Policies LU 6.15.13 and LU 6.15.15 are identified as development requirements. General Plan Policy LU 6.15.13 was modified in the adopted General Plan as shown below.
General Plan Policy LU 6.15.13 addresses standards for neighborhood parks in the Airport Area.
Policy LU 6.15.13. To provide a focus and identity for the entire neighborhood and to serve the daily recreational and commercial needs of the community within easywalking distance of homes, require dedication and improvement of dedir,*o @Ad improve at least 8 percent of the gross land area (exclusive of existing rights -of -way) of the first phase of development, or % acre, whichever is greater, On as a neighborhood park. This requirement may be waived by the Citywhere it can be demonstrated that the development parcels are too small to feasibly accommodate the park or inappropriately located to serve the needs of local residents, and when an in -lieu fee is paid to the City for the acquisition and improvement of other properties as parklands toserve the Airport Area.
In every case, the neighborhood park shall be at least 8 percent of the total Residential Village Area or one acre in area, whichever is greater, and shall have a minimum dimension of 150 feet. Park acreage shall be exclusive of existing or new rights -of -way, development sites, orsetbackareas. Aneighborhood park shall satisfysome or all of the requirements of the Parkland Dedication Ordinance, as prescribed by the Recreation Element of the General Plan.
....
The General Plan Program EIR included proposed General Plan Policy R 1.3 related to the provision of on -site recreational amenities for high -density residential developments in the Airport Area. This draft policy was replaced with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.16 in the adopted General Plan. Both policies are provided below.
General Plan EIR: Policy R 1.3, High -Density Residential Developments. Require developers of new high -density residential developments on parcels eight acres or larger, to provide on -site recreational amenities. For these developments, 44 square feet of on - site recreational amenities shall be provided for each dwelling unit in addition to the requirements under the City's Park Dedication Ordinance. On -site recreational amenities can consist of public urban plazas or squares where there is the capability for recreation and outdoor activity. These recreational amenities can also include swimming pools, exercise facilities, tennis courts, and basketball courts. Wherethere is insufficient land to provide on -site recreational amenities, the developer shall be required to pay the City of 151 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Newport Beach cash in -lieu that would be used to develop or upgrade nearby recreation facilities to offset user demand as defined in the City's Park Dedication Fee Ordinance.
The acreage of on -site open space developed with residential projects may be credited against the parkland dedication requirements where it is accessible to the public during daylight hours, visible from public rights -of -way, and is of sufficient size to accommodate recreational use bythe public. However, the credit forthe provision of on -site open space shall not exceed30 percent of the parkland dedication requirements.
Adopted General Plan: Policy LU 6.15.16: On -Site Recreation and Open Space Standards.
Require developers of multi -family residential developments on parcels 8 acres or larger to provide on -site recreational amenities. For these developments, 44 square feet of on - site recreational amenities shall be provided for each dwelling unit in addition to the requirements under the City's Park Dedication Ordinance and in accordance with the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan. On -site recreational amenities can consist of public urban plazas or squares where there is the capability for recreation and outdoor activity. These recreational amenities mayalso include swimming pools, exercise facilities, tennis courts, and basketball courts. Where there is insufficient land to provide on -site recreational amenities, the developer shall be required to pay cash in -lieu that would be used to develop or upgrade nearby recreation facilities to offset user demand as defined in the City's Park Dedication Fee Ordinance.
The acreage of on -site open space developed with residential projects may be credited against the parkland dedication requirements where it is accessible to the public during daylight hours, visible from public rights -of -way, and is of sufficient size to accommodate recreational use bythe public. However, the credit forthe provision of on -site open space shall not exceed30 percent of the parkland dedication requirements.
With respect to the maintenance at preservation of existing parks and recreation facilities (General Plan Goal R 2), General Plan Policy R 2.1 states:
Policy R 2.1. Use funding from the City's Park Dedication Fee Ordinance to enhance existing parks and recreational facilities.
In summary, the General Plan Program EIR concludes that "With implementation of Policy R 2.1, impacts related to deterioration of parks and recreation facilities in the Airport Area would be less than significant".
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
As discussed, the General Plan Program EIR identified significant impacts toexisting recreational facilities caused by the introduction of residential development in the Airport Area. The deterioration of existing parks and recreational facilities caused by new residential development in this area would be mitigated through the use of funding from the City's Park Dedication Fee Ordinance. The Park Dedication Fee Ordinance applies to residential subdivisions. The proposed Project does not include or require a subdivision but does include on -site recreational amenities for residents. Additionally, as an incentive to the provision of affordable housing as a part of the Project, the Applicant is requesting a waiver of park in -lieu fees. The Applicant will pay a park fee in connection with the proposed transfer of 77 residential 152 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
units from the approved Uptown Newport Project, pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 20.46 (Transfer of Development Rights).
With respectto recreational facilities, General Plan Policy LU 16-15.13 identifies that a public park equal to 8 percent of the gross land area ofthe total development, or a minimum 0.5-acre, whichever is greater, shall be provided. Therefore, the Project would be required to provide a 0.5-acre parkon the approximate
1.97-acre site. The General Plan allows a waiver of its park dedication requirement where it can be demonstrated that the development parcels are too small to feasibly accommodate the park or inappropriately located to servethe needs of local residents. The Applicant is requesting a waiverof the General Plan Policy LU 16-15.13 public park dedication requirement.
General Plan Policy LU 6.15.16 requires developers of multi -family residential developments on parcels that are eight acres or larger to provide on -site recreational amenities. This policy is not applicable to project because the project site is less than eight acres.
The Project is consistent with the General Plan mitigation requirements and policies set forth in the General Plan Program EIR, including procedures for obtaining a waiver from provision of on -site park facilities, as well as State and City density bonus law. The Project would provide on -site recreational amenities for its residents including a clubroom, fitness center, swimming pool, and roof deck. As previously noted, the Applicant would pay park fees associated with the proposed transfer of 77 residential units from the approved Uptown Newport Project, pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 20.46 (Transfer of Development Rights). For these reasons, Project impacts would be less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in any new adverse impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts on recreation. No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impact the prior finding under this threshold.
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed above, the proposed Project would not cause impacts to recreation to occur, nor an increase in the severity of any impacts previously disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR. Implementation of the proposed Project would not alterthe conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR analysis and would not result in a new or substantially more severe project or cumulative recreation impact than those already analyzed.
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
General Plan Policy LU 6.15.13 is applicable to the proposed Project. The Applicant is requesting a waiver of the 0.5-acre park dedication requirement and payment of a park in -lieu fee associated with the 0.5-acre park for the Project. If the waiver is granted bythe decision -makers, General Plan Policy LU 6.15.13 would not be a condition of approval. The Applicant will pay in -lieu park fees associated with the 77 units transferred from the approved Uptown Newport Project.
Standard Conditions and Requirements
There are no additional standard conditions applicable to the proposed Project. 153 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Conclusion
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to recreation or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regard to PRC Section 21166 and state CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at thetime the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of less than significant with mitigation. Therefore, preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted. 154 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
3.16 Transportation
This section summarizes the findings of the Picerne Residential Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic Impact Analysis) prepared by the Ganddini Group, Inc. (Ganddini, 2021) to evaluate the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed Project. The Traffic Impact Study is included in its entirety as Appendix F of the Addendum.
Threshold (a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressingthe circulation system, includingtransit,roadway, bicycleand pedestrian facilities? General Plan Significance Determination: Significant and Unavoidable Impact.The General Plan Program EIR Transportation Study evaluated: existing traffic conditions, future traffic conditions without implementation of the General Plan Update, and traffic conditions following implementation of the General Plan Update. The Transportation Study evaluated the following buildout scenarios: Without Project (buildout of the then current General Plan); With Project (buildout of proposed General Plan Update); and General Plan Update without surrounding regional growth.
The General Plan Program EIR concluded that implementation of the General Plan would contribute to a substantial impact at freeway ramps that exceeds thresholds and would result in operational deficiencies.
Impacts related to freeway mainlines and ramps were considered significant because needed improvements exceeded the current maximum planned improvements. With improvements noted in the General Plan Circulation Element, growth related to General Plan buildout alone would be reduced to less than significant levels. The improvements included in the Cityof Newport Beach Circulation Element are detailed in the General Plan Program EIR.
General Plan Circulation Element Policies CE 6.1.1., CE 6.1.2, CE 6.1.3, CE 6.2.1, CE 6.2.2, CE 6.2.3, CE 5.1.14, CE 5.1.15, CE 5.1.16, CE 5.2.1, and CE 5.2.2 encourage alternative modes of transportation, use of intelligent transportation systems, encourage enhancement and maintenance of public water transportation services and expanded public water transportation uses and land support facilities. In addition, improvements at some intersections have been limited to protect bicycle and pedestrian safety.
The General Plan Program EIR found that General Plan implementation would not conflict with existing policies regarding alternative transportation, and impacts were considered less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less Than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
Methodology
The Traffic Impact Analysis provided an evaluation of morning and evening peak hour conditions at 13 intersections identified in Table 3.16-1, Traffic Study Area Intersections. The study intersections are located in the cities of Newport Beach and Irvine. Of the 13 study intersections, 2 are controlled and maintained by the City of Irvine and 11 are controlled and maintained by the Cityof Newport Beach. Each intersection was analyzed using the methodology and parameters employed by the city in which the intersection is located. For "shared" intersections on the city boundary, the intersection analysis is based on the methodology used by the city that controls and maintains the signal. 155 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Table 3.16-1: Traffic Study Area Intersections
No.
Intersection
Jurisdiction 1
Traffic Control
1 Campus Dr (NS) at Bristol St North (EW)
Newport Beach
Signal
2 Irvine Ave/Campus Dr (NS) at Bristol St South (EW)
Newport Beach
Signal
3 Birch St (NS) at Bristol St North
Newport Beach
Signal
4 Birch St (NS) at Bristol St South (EW)
Newport Beach
Signal
5 MacArthur Blvd (NS) at Campus Dr (EW)1
Irvine/Newport Beach
Signal
6 MacArthur Blvd (NS) at Birch St (EW)
Newport Beach
Signal
7 MacArthur Blvd (NS) at Newport Place Dr/Von
Karman Ave (EW)
Newport Beach
Signal
8 MacArthur Blvd (NS)atlamboreeRd(EW)1,2
Newport Beach/Irvine
Signal
9 MacArthur Blvd (NS) at Bison Ave (EW)
Newport Beach
Signal
10 Jamboree Rd (NS) at Campus Dr (EW)1
Irvine
Signal
11 Jamboree Rd (NS) at Bristol St North (EW)
Newport Beach
Signal
12 Jamboree Rd (NS) at Bristol St South (EW)
Newport Beach
Signal
13 Jamboree Rd (NS) at Eastbluff Dr/University Dr (EW) Newport Beach Signal For "shared" intersections on the boundary between the two cities, the city listed first indicates the city that maintains and controls the signal. Freeway ramp intersections are maintained and operated by Caltrans.
Designated County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP) intersection.
Existing peak hour intersection volumes were developed from intersection turning movement counts primarily collected in January/February 2019 during typical weekday morning and evening peak periods of commuter traffic; the intersection of MacArthur Boulevard at Bison Avenue intersection was counted in May2018. The morning peak period was counted between 7:00AM and 9:00 AM and the evening peak period was counted between 4:30 PM and 6:30 PM. The actual peak hour within the peak period is the 4 consecutive 15-minute periods with the highest total volume of all approaches. Existing (2021) intersection volumes were developed by applying the City's Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rate of one percent per year to the measured volumes along applicable arterial highways (Irvine Avenue, Jamboree Road, and MacArthur Boulevard). This equates to a growth factor of 1.02 along those arterials with counts conducted in 2019 and a growth factor of 1.03 along those arterials with counts conducted in 2018.
The current COVI D-19 pandemic and associated public health orders have generally resulted in a decrease in traffic volumes. Additionally, it is anticipated that the pandemic may have a lasting effect on travel behavior, such as an increase in telecommuting that may sustain lower peak hour volumes compared to pre -pandemic conditions. Therefore, use of the 2018/2019 counts with application the City's Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rate alongthe applicable arterials is consideredto provide a conservative estimate of existing conditions.
Operating conditions for the ICU methodology are expressed in terms of "Level of Service," which is also referred to by its acronym, LOS. The ICU calculation returns a volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio that translates into a corresponding level of service, ranging from LOS A, representing uncongested, free - flowing conditions; to LOS F, representing congested, over -capacity conditions. Table 3.16.2, Level of Service Descriptions, includes a summary description of each level of service and the corresponding V/C ratio or delay.
156 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Table 3.16-2: Level of Service Descriptions
Level of
Service
V/C Ratio
Description
A
0.71- 0.81- 0.91- 1.00
prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Tremendous delays with continuously increasing queue lengths.
LOS = Level of Service; ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization; HCM = Highway Capacity Manual; V/C=volume-to-capacity Source: Ganddini, 2021.
Performance Criteria
The City of Newport Beach target level of service for peak hour operation of signalized intersections is LOS D or better, except for designated intersections within the Airport Area shared with the City of Irvi ne, where LOS E is acceptable.
To determine whetherthe addition of project -generated trips at a signalized study intersection results in a significant impact, the City of Newport Beach has adopted the following thresholds of significance:
■ A significant impact would occur when the addition of project -generated trips causes the level of service at a study intersection to deteriorate from an acceptable (LOS D, except for intersections on a CMP facility, or designated intersections in the Airport Area, where LOS E is acceptable) to a deficient level of service.
A significant impact would occur when the addition of project -generated trips increases the ICU at a study intersection by one percent or more (v/c increases by 0.010 or more), worsening a projected baseline condition of LOS E or F.
Study Scenarios
Each of the study intersections has been analyzed for the following scenarios for this Addendum:
■ Existing Conditions
■ Year2026 Without Project
■ Year2026 With Project
■ General Plan Comparison: Post-2030 General Plan Buildout Without Project ■ General Plan Comparison: Post-2030 General Plan Buildout With Project 157 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
The General Plan without regional growth scenario, which was included in the General Plan Program EIR is not addressed for the proposed Project. In the case of the General Plan Program EIR Transportation Study, the analysis evaluated General Plan Buildout conditions. The proposed Project's Traffic Impact Analysis evaluates both General Plan Buildout conditions and Year2026 conditions. Becausethe analyses have determined that the proposed Project will have no significant traffic impacts under both scenarios, the evaluation of the hypothetical scenario, which isolates General Plan Buildout from regional growth was not prepared because it does not provide information needed to evaluate the potential effects of the Project.
Existing Conditions
Intersection Levels of Service
Existing AM and PM peak hour intersection operations are summarized on Table 3.16-3, Intersection Operations: Existing Conditions. All study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable level of service (LOS D for all intersections, except LOS E for intersections in the Airport Area).
Table 3.16-3: Intersection Operations: Existing Conditions No.
Intersection
Traffic
Control
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak
Hour
V/C
LOS
VC
LOS
1 Campus Dr (NS) at Bristol St North (EW)
S
0.54 A
0.68 B
2 Irvine Ave/Campus Dr (NS) at Bristol St South (EW)
S
0.67 B
0.52 A
3 Birch St (NS) at Bristol St North
S
0.64 B
0.55 A
4 Birch St (NS) at Bristol St South (EW)
S
0.48 A
0.48 A
5 MacArthur Blvd (NS) at Campus Dr (EW)1
S
0.48 A
0.81 D
6 MacArthur Blvd (NS) at Birch St (EW)
S
0.36 A
0.59 A
7 MacArthur Blvd (NS) at Newport Place Dr/Von
Karman Ave (EW)
S
0.55 A
0.52 A
8 MacArthur Blvd (NS) at Jamboree Rd (EW) 1
S
0.59 A
0.68 B
9 MacArthur Blvd (NS) at Bison Ave (EW)
S
0.68 B
0.59 A
10 Jamboree Rd (NS) at Campus Dr (EW)1
S
0.60 A
0.61 B
11 Jamboree Rd (NS) at Bristol St North (EW)
S
0.37 A
0.47 A
12 Jamboree Rd (NS) at Bristol St South (EW)
S
0.67 B
0.62 B
13 Jamboree Rd (NS) at Eastbluff Dr/University Dr (EW)
S
0.62 B
0.53 A
S = Signalized; V/C = volume to capacity; LOS = Level of Service Bold and shaded values indicate intersections operating at LOS E or F per city standards.
1. Level of Service E is acceptable at this intersection.
Source: Ganddini, 2021.
Project Trip Generation
Trip generation estimates for the proposed Project were developed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual(loth Edition) publication. The ITE trip generation rates for general office building (Land Use Code 710) and multi -family housing (mid -rise) (Land Use Code 221) were used for the existing and proposed land uses. The project trip generation forecast is determined by multiplying the trip generation rates by the land use quantities.
158 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Daily, morning peak hour, and evening peak hour trip generation estimates fort he proposed Project are shown on Table 3.16-4, Project Trip Generation. The existing office use is estimated to generate 324 daily trips with 38 trips during the morning peak hour and 38 trips during the evening peak hour. The Project is forecast to generate 1,050 daily trips with 69 trips during the morning peak hour and 85 trips during the evening peak hour. Therefore, the proposed Project is forecast to result in net increase of 726 new daily trips with 31 net new trips during the morning peak hour and 47 net new trips during the evening peak hour.
The project site is located in traffic analysis zone (TAZ)1389 of the Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM).
For TAZ 1389, the General Plan Program EIR assumed 132 multi -family dwelling units, 16,191 sfof general commercial, and 105,807 sf of general office. The Project proposes 193 multi -family housing units, an increase of 61 units when compared to the General Plan Program EIR (Table 3.16-4). The general office and general commercial assumptions are unchanged in this analysis.
Table 3.16-4: Project Trip Generation
Land Use
ITECode
Unit
Trip Generation Rates
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Daily
% In
% Out
Rate
% In
% Out
Rate
General Office Building
710
TSF
9.74 86%
14%
1.16 16%
84%
1.15 Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise)
221
DU
5.44 26%
74%
0.36 61%
39%
5.44 Land Use
Quantity
Unit
Year 2025 Trip Generation Estimates
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Existing
General Office Building
33.292
TSF
324
33 5
38 6
32 38
Proposed
Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise)
193
DU
1,050
17 52
69 52
33 84
Net Project Trips
+726
-16
+47
+31
+46
+1
+47
Land Use
Quantity
Unit
General Plan Buildout Trip Generation Estimates'
Daily
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 61 DU 332 5 16 21 16 10 26 ITE = Institute of Transportation Engineers; TSF =thousand square feet; DU = dwelling unit
1. The General Plan comparison analysis evaluates the addition of 61 DUs to NBTM TAZ 1389. Project (193 DU) -TAZ 1389 (132 DU) = 61 DU.
Source: Ganddini, 2021.
Future Conditions
Future Year Cumulative Conditions includes traffic from pending projects in the cities of Newport Beach and Irvine, in addition to the approved projects. Pending projects are those in various stages of the application and approval process but are not yet approved. These projects are considered to be reasonably foreseeable projects in the vicinity of the project site. The cities of Newport Beach and Irvine were consulted and provided the list of cumulative projects to be included in this analysis. To account for 159 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
ambient growth on roadways, existing volumes were increased by a growth rate of one percent per year through 2026 along applicable arterial highways (Irvine Avenue, Jamboree Road, and MacArthur Boulevard) in accordance with the City of Newport Beach Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rate. This equates to a growth factor of 1.07 along arterials with counts conducted in 2019 and a growth factor of
1.08 along arterials with counts conducted in 2018. The cumulative projects list, provided as Table 3.16-5, Traffic Analysis Cumulative Projects, includes the projects identified by the cities of Newport Beach and I rvine.
Year 2026 Without Project
Intersection Levels of Service
Year 2026 Without Project intersection operations are summarized in Table3.16-6, Intersection Operations: Year 2026. All study intersections are forecasted to operate at an acceptable level of service in both peak hours without the proposed Project.
Year 2026 With Project
Intersection Levels of Service
In this scenario, project -related peak hour traffic volumes were added to the Year 2026 Without Project traffic volumes (Table 3.16-6). The table includes the net change in ICU at the applicable study intersections. The addition of project -generated trips is not forecast to cause any study intersection to operate deficiently (LOS E or F) or worsen a deficient intersection operation by more than one percent of capacity. Therefore, the proposed Project is forecast to result in no significant impacts and no new mitigation measures are required.
160 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
a
Ln
—1
00 m
O
rn
Ol
r-
01 m
N
0l
Q
M
N
00 CA
+'
w
00 N
00 w
41 L
O
0 00
m
r-I
N
M00
2 a+
H
�C
�
W
c
a
^
o
m
o
1O
O
�
�
In
o
a
c
ar
C7
M
Ln
=
0 a
—
N
Lno
^
'L
Z
H
m
4-1
O
I�
m
Ln
0 l0
N
00 w
r-I
N
r-I
A
M
++
0 :3
n
N
Ln
N
O
-1
1l
N
Ln
l0
m
In
rn
m
00 O
m
m
—
N
i+
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
L.L.U-Ln Ln U- U- U- L.L.
L.L. L.L. U- U- LL LL LL
LL
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln
Ln L v) v W 1n Ln
Ln
m
m
In
In
v
o
1-
c cooln coo
000c�t 000ln cm
00 In
r-I
r-I
01 IZT
O O O O w O w
O W O r-I N O -1 -1 O l0
N
w
In
In
N
1,
1n O O O ri ri
1-1 N m w O 00 -1
In
C r
r-1 1� N 1l 00
In 1- W N M Ql
N
m
m
IZT
-4
-1
Ln m
ci
cu
41 O
0-
O
+
d
_
i
H
OA
C
CA
C
aj
7 aJ a! f6
a1
>
m
Ln-6
V N
(D cc7
H
W
co
W
23 Or 0
a) v C
Ln
a a) 3
C
O
i
o
r != u 'L
°�°
a
m
SZ
Y
o m a) g m �
v a� L
LE
L
L) a)
N o a)E in
V O V O
>
Q)
*6
t
0 L
N 2 L L m
4 O � M a� v�i
aJ
pC
(_gyp
0 a�
�
c 7 O�
� —> O O >o
p
0 c0
.�
a O
Q
3 LnO O L
O
oho
E
u
0 �
in U c
O `�° av t o CU � N H} c
LL
V
C
a�
O
to
E
O
{n
x
C � U U tLo
3 O a!
O +-� L u0 f6 t
L a1 c0 >= a! O O
i
O
N ,N
M X
w
U)
Q
C!
v
w
to a (,
a (7 U in (7 0 m 2 �!
U
LL
V
aJ
00 L
4 U
fC
i
Ln u
N
2 f6 r
M
L
Q
o
a
s
O �
t' O
(D
m
c
—
>
� a)
v U
m
v
m.N
U
d
m y
i
O=
N c
ca 2
i
O
V i
v 0
u
=3
L
O
CO
O
0- V
�
0 �
Q
�
-O Q
L
H
0 0
O
� v
L
v o
--s
t a,
v
v
a) a�
2 Ln
CL
r-1
Z o
F-�
Z
Z
Ln
�
3 ni
z
a�
Z
4-
0 m
l0
CO
co
co
co
Z
co
H
V
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
O w
2 L d
0] �
O m
O d
c N
00 0
�
\
\
\
f
k
06 ®
m
%
/
/
»
m
$
/
\
»
2 2
a
m
I
=
/
0 \
%
3 m
\
»
m
2 m
m
#
�
$
C
%
/
%
®
2 \
-
Ln
m
e
�
a
4.1 co
/
�
k
r-
�
~
rl
�
k
\
/
%
\
=
e
e
\
a
cn
-
\
/
m
$
2 e
W
a
\
\
_ _
2 c
§
/
\
/
/
/
\
=
m
o
«
o
e
$
ƒ m
$
?
?
2 7
?
/
J
K
e
g
g
6 \
K
m
U�
_
\
\
%
/
2 2
r
_ _
g /
S
-
'
>CI
a)
a
0 -
°
$ m
3 §
�
(31
5 CL
4a
CLE!
>
»
�
]
0&
\ \
\
9 \
/
\
_
m
\
k \
/ �
\
\
\
k qj
> a
\
/
/
a)
\
/
� $
2 »EFE
&
\
f
-a
-
7 \
o u
®
z 0=
u
= u I o
o
o=
o
o
k
>�
\/
� )
g
g
G
26 >
%
G
G
G
\
\ k
/
/
rn
/
\
} \
/
/
\ \
CD \ \
Qj
\ \
) E
J
� U
Q.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0 z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
tr-
w E
in
O
m
r
N
O
O
N
N
r
m
m
r-I
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
r-i
O
O
�
a
o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 s
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
U
V
r4
m
r,
-i
c-I
O
-i
c-I
O
-Zt
-1
ri
>
O
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
O
Q
o
O
O
o
0 o
O
o
0 0
0 o
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0 +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
L
0 p
m
Q
Q
Q
o
m
Q
o
m
m
Q
m
m
=
J
Y
m
N
a
U
O
�
rn
:I,
lfl
CD
r-I
r-I
m
m
In
x
lD
o
In
w
o
m
en
r-
r-I
In
r
m
N
y
>
In
In
In
Oo
lD
n
Oo
lD
-q
n
to
to
•o
a
o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
a
41 0
�
p
Q
U
m
Q
Q
Q
Q
U
U
m
Q
U
m
j
i
=
J
Y
fC
all
d
U
n
N
N
Ln
r-I
r-
r-I
00 r�
m
m
r-I
lD
O
M
rV
N
lD
W
�t
N
r-
m
m
M
Q
j
N
r*
lD
N
in
lz�
In
r,�
r-�
lfl
It:
r-�
lD
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O
L
fn
3 0
m
Q
Q
Q
o
m
Q
p
m
m
Q
m
m
m
J
Y
f6
y
d
O
r1
O
N
lD
O
m
lfl
O
O
r1
N
In
O
N
m
O
m
00 lD
O
lD
�
m
m
N
C
n
N
N
N
O0
lD
Ur
00 lD
l0
N
lD
lD
s
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 a
r
3 O
r
�
o
H
O
Q
U
m
Q
Q
Q
Q
U
U
m
Q
U
m
3 Y
m
GJ
a
cJ
N
o
00 In
�t
o
r-
N
r-
r�
r-
N
o
lD
r-I
00 r-I
N
lD
00 �t
N
r-
m
m
m
Q
>
N
n
lD
In
Ln
-:T
In
r-
r-
t0
RZI*
n
lD
O
O
o
0 0
o
O
0 0
0 0
0 O
w L
c
� =
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
L O
~ U
Y
u
v
:z
w
N
�
w
N
}
v O
�
L
m
0 j
>
L L
NLu
>
>
��
L
w
L
L
0 '��-, 0
O
n
w
w
p
w
v
v
> v N
•41
O
m
s
s
7 N
0 0
Q
Z
J o v
fL
Z
o
Q
C
N
N
N
Q
U
GJ
N
Z
N
mi
N
�_
SZ
O
O'
O
L
_N
o
z
,�
U
m
z
m
E
i
+-
0 N
N
+-�
v
+-.�
rE
+-�
v
+-�
v
+.•
0 r0
U
i
m
i
m
f0
Lu o vy
O
C
m
�
S
�
+O
�
N
N
N
N
N
+
rp
Y
a---
rp
c
rp co
U
i
i
.�
..�
(n O io v
N
m
N
Q
E
m
en
a
a
N
N
N
cu
a•'
L
\
N
N
L
L
L >
L
L
CC O v w N
Z
Z
Q
a)
a)
a)
0)1I U O
i
Q
i
i
i
l0
N
N
i
rp
i
i
0 O
0 0 \ v
'�
m
E
E
E
E 0
L
rr,
cc
m
rro
v N C
M
U
w W
m
m
c
G
c Y
c
(O
m(O
r0 '� -6 > l7
CU
C C J N
� �
O
V
v
Z
O
m
r1
N
m
N
lD
00 Ol
r-I
rN-I
rm-I cn ti
m v
Q) Q)
v v
c (D
v v
'^ o
v
s=
Q
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
General Plan Comparative Analysis
A comparative analysis has been conducted to determine whether the proposed Project would result in any new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts when compared to the conclusions of the City of Newport Beach General Plan Transportation Study (March 2006).
The project site is located in TAZ 1389 of the NBTM, used in the General Plan Program EIR traffic analysis.
The NBTMTAZ 1389 includes 132 multi -family units, 16,191sfof general commercial uses, and 105,807sf of office uses. The Project proposes 193 multi -family rental units, a net increase of 61 units. Therefore, Post-2030 General Plan Buildout with Project conditions were determined by adding the net increase in dwelling units proposed within TAZ 1389 to the Post-2030 General Plan Buildout forecasts in the General Plan Program EIR. The general office and general commercial square footages stayed unchanged in this analysis.
Table3.16-6, Intersection Operation: Pos t-2030 General Plan Buildout Intersection Operations compares the Post-2030 General Plan Buildout Plus Project ICU to the Post-2030 General Plan Buildout ICU shown in the General Plan Transportation Study. The proposed increase in General Plan buildout units is estimated to generate approximately 332 additional daily trips, including 21 additional trips during the morning peak hour and 26 additional trips during the evening peak hour (Table 3.16-4).
As shown in the table, without the proposed Project, the study intersections are forecast to operate at LOS D or better during the peak hours, except for the following intersections:
1. Campus Drive (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
(Both AM/PM Peak Hours)
3. Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
(AM Peak Hour)
5. MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
(PM Peak Hour)
6. MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
(PM Peak Hour)
10. Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
(Both AM/PM Peak Hours)
12. Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
(AM Peak Hour)
The table also calculates the net change in ICU at the study intersections for Post- 2030 General Plan Buildout with Project conditions. The addition of project -generated trips is not forecast to cause anystudy intersection to operate deficiently (LOS E or F) or worsen a deficient intersection operation by more than one percent of capacity. Based on the significance criteria, the proposed Project is forecast to result in no significant level of service impacts at the study intersections and no mitigation is required. Based on this comparison, the proposed Project would not result in any new traffic impacts compared to those identified in the General Plan Program EIR Transportation Study.
Potential impacts associated with the proposed Project would either be the same or not substantially greater than those described in the General Plan Program EIR. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the proposed Project would be undertaken that would result in more severe environmental traffic impacts than previously addressed in the General Plan Program EIR, nor has any new information regarding the potential for more severe significant environmental impacts been identified that would result in the previous analysis being inadequate. As such, no further analysis is required.
164 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
m
;u Q
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
r-I
ri
r-I
r-I
O
ri
—1
r-1
O
r-I
Ln
N
O
O
O
o
0 0
o
O
0 0
0 0
o
O
cu
a
o
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
=
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 m
s
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
U
U
O
O
r-I
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
N
0 O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0 +
+
+
+
L
N
O
O
U
p
m
LL
LL
m
p
U
LL
m
p
m
=
J
Y
m
w
U
O
Ln
N
lD
ri
r,
m
M
N
r-I
r1
M
r,
r\
r1
N
�*
r1
00 m
m
W
r1
lD
lD
N0.\
2 01
n
O0
m
N
O
lD
O0
rll�
r�
lD
W
m
o
a
o
0 0
0 ri
r-4
0 0
0 ri
o
0 0
a
4 L
O
H
O
LL
p
W
Q
p
U
Q
p
U
W
m
W
m
3 J
Y
m
w
a
v
v
m
O
m
lD
N
I-
m
O
mlzT
ri
N
M
ci
M
0 M
lD
r�
i\
M
W
-:T
W
Q
>
0 Oo
rn
Ln
Oo
�
In
Oo
rl,
rn
to
rn
�
r1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 O
L
H
3 O
W
U
0 m
LL
LL
m
p
U
LL
m
p
m
0 J
Y
m
ya!
a
U
00 'T
ri
Ln
ri
lD
N
00 N
O
lD
r�
r�
r-
ri
rV
'tzl-
ri
00 m
m
W
O
lD
lD
O
>
rn
r%
Oo
lD
N
o
lD
Oo
r-
r I
lD
Oo
lD
s
0 0
0 0
ri
ri
0 0
0 ri
o
0 0
a
O
=
3 Ln
O
LL
M
W
Q
p
U
Q
0 U
W
m
W
m
=
_
3 Y
O
m
a)
++
d
U
M
lD
n
Ol
lD
N
n
m
O
-1
Ql
c-I
O
m
(.0
r�
r-
m
00 00
a
?N
O
OO
Ol
Ln
O0
�
LQ
O0
r,:
Ql
tl
D
Q
lD
r
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
O
a
u O
Q
L
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
V)
Ln
V)
Ln
Ln jn
(�
L Q211
~ U
v�i
L
L7
�
�
W
L
O
7 T 0
L
i
m
w
LU
o
U
Ln
p
w
N
>
L
O
> N
L J 0'
d
O
0 m
s
s
a
N
O
L
Q
p
Z
N
p o a)
`0�,
z
O
s
i
(%
(%
� 0 0 H
Gl
aj
in
z
V)
m
aa))
°
Q
o
o
-
i
L
_n
O
U
m
Z
m
Ln
n
"n CC,
Ln
L
r6
rD
r0
r0
ry
U
m
m
W r6 O N
0 m
p
O
O
Ln
Ln
V)
Ln
Ln
V)
r�o
rY6
(�6
C
r�O f6 f0
"
en
+.,
7 .o
co
Z
�..�
Z
Z
Z
�..�
pi a
M a)N
C
rB
N
Q
m
m
_0
'a
�
..�
;6
'a
N
Z
Ln
Z
to
Z
to
Z v U u
Z
>
>
> w
>
>
�-
y
tE
\
V)
V)
m
L
m
L
m
L a)
m
L
m-0-0-0-a
L
=
�
=
O
d
L
p
Z
Z
a
a
a>
Q
a
a
N
N
N
' 3 u o
N
Ln
>
Q
�
Y
s
t
Y
s
Y C
s
Y
L
L
L
f0 N
L u> >
n
a
V)
O
O
O
O > -0v c
L
i
r0
m
m i
r0
m
C
C
C
C tU O
Mu
L
—
m
[D
:22
2 Y
2 2
Lo
m
rO
-2
m Lu= v o
its 'O > V'
O O J N
CLO M
Q
U
7 f0
Z
r-I
N
M
L.r)
lD
00 Ql
O
r1
1 ri
r-I
N
r-I
M
r-1 Ln CO N Ln
o Y 0
L �
m �
O ro
o a
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Construction Traffic
Construction of the proposed Project would add construction -related trips to and from the site during construction activities. These trips are associated with construction activities, including construction workers, grading, and construction of structures and site features.
Throughout construction, the size of the work crew reporting to the site each day would vary depending on the construction phase and the different activities taking place at the time. Until the parking structure is completed, the work crew (up to 50 to 60 persons) would park off of the site at a location to be determined. Workers would be prohibited from parking on the City streets. Construction parking would be on the site once the parking structure is completed.
Large construction equipment such as bulldozers, loaders, scrapers, and pavers would be required during various construction phases. Large equipment is generally brought to the site at the start of the construction phase and kept on site until its term of use ends. A staging area would be designated on -site to store construction equipment and supplies during construction.
The Applicant will be required to provide a Construction Management Plan and identify planned travel patterns for haul vehicles. The haul route to and from the project site for all dirt haul -off operations would be from SR-73. Trucks would enter the site from Bristol Street North; trucks would exit the site from Spruce Street and continue to Bristol Street North. The contractor would be required to obtain a Haul Route Permit from the City of Newport Beach.
Impacts from construction traffic would be limited to occasional and temporary delays to traffic during the movement of heavy equipment or transport of heavy loads to and from the site. The arrivals and departures of dirt -hauling trucks and other heavy trucks will be scheduled to minimize traffic during the peak hours. The Applicant would be required to identify planned travel patterns for haul vehicles (SC TRAN-1). Construction management requirements, such as complying with peak hour restrictions, using flag men for short-term obstructions, and a formal traffic control plan for extended lane and street closures would be required. Impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, no newsignificant impacts result from Project modification or changed circumstances, and no revisions to the Genera I Plan Program EIR are necessary.
Threshold (b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b)?
This State CEQA Guidelines Appendix G checklist question and the referenced CEQA Guidelines section were added to the CEQA Guidelines updates in 2018, and therefore were not addressed in the certified General Plan Program EIR in 2006.
When the City's General Plan Program El R was approved in 2006, the applicable traffic threshold was Level of Service (LOS), not Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). On September 27, 2013, SB 743 was signed into law and started a process that would change transportation impact analysis as partofCEQA compliance. These changes include the elimination of auto delay, LOS, and similar measures of vehicular capacity or traffic congestion as a basis for determining significant environmental impacts. On January20, 2016, the Office of Planning and Research released revisions to its proposed CEQA guidelines for the implementation of SB 743, and final review and rulemaking for the new guidelines were completed in December 2018. OPR allowed lead agencies an opt -in period to adopt the guidelines before the mandatory date adoption of July 1, 2020. However, since LOS was the applicable threshold when the General Plan Program EIR was 166 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
approved, settled CEQA case law dictates that LOS, not VMT, is the applicable CEQA standard for the proposed Project.
A CEQA Addendum is appropriate when some changes to a prior EIR are necessary but (1) there are no substantial changes to a project which require major revisions tothe previous EIR due to new or increased environmental impacts; (2) there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which a project is undertaken which require major revisions to the EIR due to new or increased environmental impacts; and (3) there is no new information showing that the project would have significant effects not discussed in the prior EIR or showing that new mitigation measures or alternatives are feasible or required. (14 Cal Code Regs §15164(b).) Preparation of an addendum is based on whether there have been any substantial changes to the project's physical environmental impacts or whether there are any new physical environmental impacts. The purpose of CEQAAddendum is to compare physical project impacts with what was evaluated in the prior EIR to determine whether major revisions to the EIR are required. (See Fund for Environmental Defense v. County of Orange (1988) 204 Cal.App.3d 1538.) Level of Service was the applicable threshold when the City certified the General Plan Program EIR in 2006.
The mandate requiring lead agencies to use VMT as a threshold for evaluating traffic impacts was adopted in 2018 and effective in 2020. It does not constitute "new information" requiring additional environmental review nor does it affect the assessment of project environmental impacts or mitigation measures compared to those analyzed in the General Plan Program EIR. The potential environmental impacts regarding the amount of travel associated with the General Plan was known at the time that General Plan Program EIR was certified. Settled CEQAcase law supports reliance on level of service as the appropriate threshold by which to measuretraffic impacts of proposed Project.
For informational purposes, the Traffic Impact Analysis addressed VMT. The proposed Project was assessed in accordance with guidance provided by the City of Newport Beach SB743 Implementation (April 6, 2020) (VMT Guidelines). The transportation guidelines provide a framework for "screening thresholds" for certain projects that are expected to cause a less than significant impact without conducting a detailed VMTstudy. The proposed Project is a residential land use.
The City's VMTGuidelines contain a map of VMT per capita for existing Newport Beach residential areas.
VMT per capita in each area is compared to the regional average VMT per capita for Orange County. This map shows areas where residential developments have a VMT per capita lower than the Orange County regional average and maytherefore be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact based on guidance provided in the OPR Technical Advisory.
The proposed Project is located in the Orange County Transportation Analysis Model (OCTAM) STAZ 1366 and is in an area with low residential VMT per capita (lower than 85 percent of Countywide average VMT per capita). Therefore, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on VMT because it satisfies the City -established screening criteria. No mitigation is required.
Therefore, no new significant impacts result from Project modification or changed circumstances, and no revisions to the General Plan Program EIR are necessary. No changes or new information would require preparation of an EIR.
167 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Threshold (c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that impacts related to geometric design features would be less than significant. General Plan policies in the Circulation Element and the Land Use Element (CE 1.3.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.5) provide for maintaining and enhancing existing roadways, increasing safety of roadways, and balancing safety, quality of life and efficiency in the design of circulation and access. Compliance with General Plan policies would help reduce hazards due to design features. This impact would be less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The project site is already developed, and the proposed development would be accessed by roadways and driveways into the project site. Vehicular access to the project site is currently provided by one driveway on Spruce Street (unrestricted turn movements), and one driveway on Bristol Street North (right -in, right -out movements). Project implementation would retain the samevehicular access.
Driveway 1: The driveway on Spruce Street would remain and would provide unrestricted turn movements. The driveway would lead into anon -site internal drive lane that would wraparound the north and east residential building perimeter. The internal roadway would also serve as emergency vehicle access. Entrance tothe parking structure would be provided from the driveway on Spruce Street.
Driveway 2: The Bristol Street North driveway would be retained as part of the Project and have right -in, right -out access. Similarly, the driveway would lead to the internal drive lane around the residential building, eventually connecting with the Driveway 1 at Spruce Street. An entrance tothe parking structure is also provided from Driveway 2.
All entrances tothe parking structure would have a high-speed roll -up gate. The roll -up gates for ground level parking would be open during normal business hours. The entranceto subterranean parking garage would be restricted to residents with key -card access.
The proposed Project would not introduce incompatible uses to area roadways. The Project would be designed in compliance with all applicable State and City building codes and would meet Cityof Newport Beach standards for design, including sight distance at all intersections (SC TRAN-2). The Project would not introduce roadway hazards or incompatible uses. It would not increase transportation hazards in comparisontothe General Plan. Impacts would be less than significant. The proposed Project would cause neither a new impact to occur, nor an increase in the severityof an impact previously disclosed. As such, no further analysis is required.
Threshold (d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR found that impacts relatedto emergencyaccess were less than significant. Projects would be required to meet all applicable local and state regulatory standards for adequate emergency access. General Plan policies related to disaster planning include measures for effective emergency response to natural or human -induced disasters that minimizes the loss of life and damage to property and reducing disruptions in the delivery of vital public and private services during and following a disaster. Therefore, the General 168 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Plan Program EIR concluded that with compliance with applicable regulatory standards and Municipal Code and Fire Code requirements regarding emergency access, impacts would be less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
As addressed under Threshold c, the proposed Project would retain the existing vehicular access and would not introduce incompatible uses to area roadways. The Project would not adversely impact public roads or introduce features that would adverselyaffect vehicular, pedestrian, or bicycle circulation in the vicinity of the site. In addition, Project traffic would not result in substantial delays and congestion that would affect the circulation of emergency vehicles in the study area compared to the General Plan Program EIR. The proposed Project would not result in new impacts in comparison to the General Plan Program EIR.
Project traffic would not result in substantial delays and congestions that would affect the circulation of emergency vehicles in the study area. The on -site access road would meet requirements for fire access roads in the California Fire Code (CCR Title 24 Part 9), Section 503. The proposed Project would not require new mitigation and emergencyaccess impacts are considered less than significant. This determination of less than significant impact is supported by the previously certified EIR prepared for the General Plan. The proposed Project would cause neither a new impact to occur, nor an increase in the severityof an impact previously disclosed. As such, no further analysis is required.
Cumulative
As discussed above, the proposed Project would not cause a transportation impact to occur, nor an increase in the severity of any transportation impacts previously disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR, with implementation of the mitigation measures discussed in this section. Implementation of the proposed Project would not alterthe conclusions of the General Plan Program El R analysis a nd would not result in a new or substantially more severe project -specific or cumulative transportation impact than those already analyzed.
Mitigation Program
Relevant General Plan Policies
The following policies are applicable to the proposed Project and would be made conditions of approval. ■ CE 2.1.1 Level of Service Standards: Plan the arterial roadway system to accommodate projected traffic at the following level of service standards:
— Level of Service (LOS) "D" throughout the City, unless otherwise noted. — LOS "E" at the following Airport Area intersection: Campus Drive (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW) and any intersection shared with Irvine.
— LOS "E" at the following intersections in the pedestrian oriented area of Coast Highway in Mariners' Mile: Riverside Avenue (NS) at Coast Highway(EW) and Dover Drive (NS) at Coast Highway (EW).
— LOS "E" at Marguerite Avenue (NS) at Coast Highway(EW) in the pedestrian oriented area of Coast Highway in Corona del Mar.
169 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
— Accept LOS "E" at Goldenrod Avenue (NS) at Coast Highway(EW) in the pedestrian oriented area of Coast Highwayin Corona del Mar.
■ CE 2.1.2 - Street and Highway Network: Construct the circulation system described on the map entitled Newport Beach Circulation Element -Master Plan of Streets and Highways shown in Figure CE1 and Figure CE2 (cross-section).
■ CE 2.2.3 Traffic Control. Design traffic control measures to ensure City streets and roads function with safety and efficiency.
■ CE 2.2.4 Driveway and Access Limitations. Limit drivewayand local streetaccesson arterial streets to maintain a desired quality of traffic flow. Wherever possible, consolidate driveways and implement access controls during redevelopment of adjacent parcels. ■ CE 2.2.6 Emergency Access. Provide all residential, commercial, and industrial areas with efficient and safe accessfor emergency vehicles.
■ CE 5.1.1— Trail System. Promote construction of a comprehensive trail system as shown on Figure CE4.
■ CE5.1.2- Pedestrian Connectivity: Link residential areas, schools, parks, and commercial centersso that residents cant ravel within the community without driving. ■ CE 5.1.3 - Pedestrian Improvements in New Development Projects: Require new development projects to include safe and attractive sidewalks, walkways, and bike lanes in accordance with the Master Plan, and, if feasible, trails.
■ CE 5.1.4 - Linkages to Citywide Trail System and Neighborhoods: Require developers to construct links to the plannedtrail system, adjacentareas, and communities where appropriate. ■ CE 5.1.5 - Bikeway System: Cooperate with state, federal, county, and local agencies to coordinate bikeways and trails throughout the region.
■ CE 5.1.6- Bicycle Supporting Facilities: Incorporate bicycleandpedestrianfacilitiesinthe design plans for new streets and highways and, where feasible, in the plans for improving existingroads. ■ CE 5.1.7 - Bicycle Safety: Provide for safety of bicyclists, equestrians, and pedestrians by adhering to current national standards and uniform practices
■ CE5.1.8- Bicycle Conflicts with Vehicles and Pedestrians: Minimize conflictpoints among motorized traffic, pedestrians, and bicycle traffic.
■ CE5.1.17- Pedestrian Connectivity: Link residential areas, schools, parks, and commercial centersso that residents can travel within the community without driving. ■ CE 6.2.2 Support Facilities for Alternative Modes: Require new development projects to provide facilities commensurate with developmenttype and intensityto support alternative modes, such as preferential parking for carpools, bicycle lockers, showers, commuter information areas, rideshare vehicle loading areas, water transportation docks, and bus stop improvements. ■ CE 6.2.3 - Project Site Design Supporting Alternative Modes: Encourage increased use of public transportation by requiring project site designs that facilitate the use of public transportation and walking.
170 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Standard Conditionsand Requirements
SCTRAN-1 Construction Management Plan. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the Applicant shall submit for City of Newport Beach Community Development Director and Traffic Engineer review and approval a Construction Management Plan for the Project.
The Plan shall identify construction phasing and address traffic control for any temporary street closures, detours, or other disruptions to traffic circulation and public transit routes. The Plan shall identify the routes that construction vehicles shall useto access the site, the hours of construction traffic, traffic controls and detours, construction materials and vehicle staging areas, and temporary parking arrangements for the construction workers.
SCTRAN-2 Sight distance at all intersections shall comply with Cityof Newport Beach standards.
Conclusion
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to transportation or a substantial increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regard to PRC Section 21166 and State CEQAGuidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of less than significant with mitigation. Therefore, preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted.
171 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
3.17 Utilities and Service Systems
Threshold(a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of newor expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm drainage, electrical power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
Water
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The City's waters uppliers are the City, the Mesa Consolidated Water District (MCWD), and the Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD), which sourcetheir imported waterfrom the Municipal Water District of Orange County(MWDOC). The General Plan Program EIR concluded that the City's three water suppliers would have enough capacity to serve General Plan development and that no relocation or expansion of water facilities was required. Impacts would be less than significant. All of service providers use groundwater and recycled water to supplement their supply. Development consistent with the General Plan would increase water demand within the City, MWDOC indicated that its 2030 projected availability of imported water supply would exceed the 2030 projected regionwide demand for imported water supply by at least 155,000 acre-feet. Therefore, MWDOC would be able to meet 100 percent of the City's imported water needs through 2030, as shown in Table 3.17-1, Projected Potable Water Supply and Demand (2005 UWMP).
Table 3.17-1: Projected Potable Water Supply and Demand (2005 UWMP) Water Source
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
MWDOC
6,404
5,758
6,157
6,392
6,226
6,256
OCW D
11,927
13,590
14,921
14,778
14,990
14,960
Recycled Water
317
444
478
500
500
500
Total Water Demand
18,648
19,792
21,556
21,640
21,716
21,716
Projected Demand 18,648 19,792 21,556 21,640
MWDOC= Municipal Water District of Orange County; OCWD = Orange County Water District.
Source: City of Newport Beach, 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Table 3-5, Table 4-8. 21,716
21,716
According to the General Plan Program EIR, the City provided approximately 1,200 AFY of the irrigation demand using recycled water. Policy NR 2.1 of the General Plan encourages the use of recycled water in the City by continuing to provide financial incentives, staff assistance, and training opportunities for customers, and expanding recycled water infrastructure and programs, when feasible. Future recycled water infrastructure developments, if necessary, would require further environmental review when project -level details are known. Therefore, impacts associated with the construction of new recycled water conveyance systems within the Citywere considered less than significant.
The General Plan Program EIR identified that new development would be subject to site -specific evaluation of existing water system's capacity to serve the development. If improvements are required, developers are required to pay its share of costs of all or portions of the needed improvements. General Plan Policy LU 2.8 directs the City to accommodate land uses that can be adequately supported by infrastructure, including water treatment and conveyance facilities. Therefore, overall impacts to the three water suppliers were found to be less than significant. 172 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The project site is within the service area of the City of Newport Beach. As it applies to the proposed Project, the Newport Beach 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (2020 UWMP) is the applicable planning document for evaluating water supply and demand. According tothe 2020 UWMP, Newport Beach's 2020 water supply was approximately 15,005 AF, which was combination of 10,237 acre-feet (AF) of groundwater, 4,255 AF of imported water, and 513 AF of recycled water. Table 3.17-2, Newport Beach Projected WaterSupplies shows the forecasted water supply for the Citythrough year 2045.
Table 3.17-2: Newport Beach Projected WaterSupplies (AF) Additional
Water Supply
Detail
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
Orange County
Groundwater
Groundwater
10,237
12,175
12,605
12,729
12,869
12,838
(not desalinated)
Basin
Purchased or
Imported Water
MWDOC
4,255
2,149
2,224
2,246
2,271
2,265
Recycled Water
OCWD
513
542
1 542
542
542
542
Total 15,005 14,866 15,371 15,517
15,682
15,645
AFY= acre-feet; MWDOC=Municipal Water District of Orange County; OCWD=Orange County Water District Source - Newport Beach 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, Arcadis U.S., Inc. (2021) Due to OCWD's plans to increase regional groundwater recharge, the basin production percentage (BPP) is expected to be 85%starting in
2025 (Refer to Section 6.3.4). The BPP is only applied to the City's potable water supply. Volumes of groundwater and imported water may vary depending on OCWD's actual BPP projections, which are established annually.
This table only considers direct use of recycled water -this does not include indirect potable recharge.
The Project includes 193 multi -family dwelling units. The 2020 UWMP noted that the daily per capita water usage was 160 gallons per capita per day. The number of persons expected to reside in each residential unit is 2.19 persons, which is the average cited by the Department of Finance for Newport Beach for 2020 (DOF, 2020). Therefore, approximately 423 residents are associated with the proposed Project. The projected water demand for the Project is shown in Table 3.17-3, Potable Water Demand.
Table 3.17-3: Potable Water Demand
Expected Gallons per Acre-Feetper
Land Use Unit Count Population Demand Factor Day (gpd) Year (AFY) High Density 193 DU 423 160 gpcd 67,680 75.8
Residential
Gpd = gallons per day; gpcd = gallons per capita per day; DU = dwelling unit; AFY = acre-feet per year Source for per capita generation rate: Newport Beach 2020 Urban Water Management Plan.
Buildout of the proposed Project is estimated to generate a water demand of approximately 67,680gpd, or 75.8 AFY (Table 3.17-3), which does not account for the water use associated with the existing office building. This worst -case demand represents less than one percent of Newport Beach's anticipated water demand for through 2045 under normal year, single dry year, and multiple dry year conditions. The 2020 UWMP found that the City's supply capabilities are expected to balance anticipated total water use 173 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
and supply and to accommodate normal years, single dry years, and multiple dry -year events. The UWMP indicated that there is adequate existing and planned waters upply to a ccommodatefuture development accounted for in the General Plan inclusive of the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation for the 6th Cycle planning period of 2021-2029 and its associated water demands. The 2020 UWMP provides updated water demand and supply projections, shown in Table 3.17-4, Newport Beach Current and Projected Water Demand.
Table 3.17-4: Newport Beach Current and Projected Water Demand (AFY) Water Source
2020
2025
2030
2035
2040
2045
Potable Water, Raw,
14,492
14,324
14,829
14,975
15,140
15,103
Other Non -potable
Recycled Water
Demand
513
542
542
542
542
542
Total Water Demand
15,005
14,866
15,371
15,517
15,682
15,645
AF = acre-feet
Source: Newport Beach, 2021.
Therefore, no relocation or construction of new water facilities would be required. No new impact would result, nor would the impact previously identified be any more severe as a result of the proposed Project.
Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Wastewater
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that implementation of the General Plan would produce an additional 4.12 million gallons per day (mgd) of wastewater. The additional 4.12 mgd of wastewater would be treated at Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Reclamation Plants Nos. 1 and 2. Reclamation Plant No. 1 had a capacity of 174 mgd and treated an average flow of 90 mgd, approximately 52 percent of its design capacity.
Reclamation Plant No. 2 had a capacity of 276 mgd and treated an average of 153 mgd, approximately 55 percent of its design capacity. The additional 4.12 mgd from buildout of the General Plan was determined to be nominal compared to the capacities of the two plants. In addition, policies within the General Plan require adequate wastewater facilities and conveyance systems to be available to the City residents through renovations, installations, and improvements when needed. Impacts were determined to be less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
The proposed Project would include up to 193 multi -family rental units with structured parking, and various amenities, including a club room, fitness center, swimming pool, and roof deck. The General Plan Program EIR evaluated up to 4,300 residential units in the Airport Area; the General Plan was adopted for up to 2,200 residential units. As such, the proposed residential development is consistent with the assumptions in the General Plan for the Airport Area.
The total area of the project site is 1.97 acres. Using the typical unit flow factor of 2,500 gpd/ac, the existing flow at the project location is calculated as 4,925 gpd. According tothe Sewer Capacity Study, the residential unit flow factors range from 110 gpd/du to 240 gpd/du. Based on a review of similar parcels 174 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
within the City, a generation rate of 160 gpd/du has been selected for the subject parcel. Given the proposed 193 dwelling units, the calculated daily flow for the proposed condition is 30,880 gpd. As a result, the total increase in daily flow is calculated as the difference between the proposed flow and existing flow at the project site, being 25,955 gpd, as identified in Table 3.17-5, Total Daily Flow Increase at the Project Site.
Table 3.17-5: Total Daily Flow Increase at the Project Site Existing Flow at Project Site (gpd)
Proposed Flow at Project Site (gpd)
Net I ncrease in Flow (gpd)
4,925
30,880
25,955
gpd = gallons per day
Source: Sewer Capacity Study, Tait, 2021.
Wastewater collected by the City would be treated at OCSD's treatment plants in Fountain Valley (Plant No. 1) and Huntington Beach (Plant No. 2). Plant No. 1 has a total rated primary capacity of 108 mgd and a secondary treatment capacity of 80 mgd. Plant No. 2 has a rated primary capacity of 168 mgd and secondary treatment capacity of 90 mgd. Collectively, the two plants have an average daily wastewater flow of 185 mgd 20. Given that the proposed Project would generate an additional 25,955 gpd or 0.02 mgd of wastewater, this increase is nominal compared to the combined residual capacity of both treatment plants. Therefore, existing wastewater treatment facilities would accommodate the project -generated wastewater and continue maintaining a substantial amount of remaining capacityfor future wastewater treatment. If the proposed Project requires new sewer flow connections through OCSD, all connections are required to comply with current OCSD design guidelines and pay a sewer connection fee. The proposed Project would not result in any new adverse impacts or increase the severityof any previously identified impacts related to wastewater. No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impact the prior finding under this threshold. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Storm Drainage
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR noted that impacts to the City's storm drainage system would be less than significant. Since the City of Newport Beach is almost entirely built out, development would occur only in areas with existing storm drainage infrastructure. The Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan requires new developments to create and implement a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), which would ensure pollutant discharges are reduced to the maximum extent practicable and do not exceed existing storm drainage capacities. Therefore, any additional stormwater runoff expected at buildout of the General Plan would not exceed existing storm drainage capacities, and impacts were found to be less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
As discussed under Section 3.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, the site currently drains in two directions:
approximately70 percent of flows are directed toward Spruce Street and 30 percent drains toward Bristol 20 Orange County Sanitation District. 2019. What We Do. https://www.ocsan.goy/Home/ShowDocument?id=29045 . Accessed September 29, 2021.
175 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Street North. The site is considered relatively flat with one to two percent grade to provide sheet flow within the existing surface parking lot area. With buildout of the project site, the Project would maintain the existing drainage pattern. Approximately 0.34acre of the 1.97-acre project site would be landscaped areas and have pervious surfaces. The Project proposes three drainage management areas totreatrunofF, primarily through biotreatment planters. Each treatment area would have a 24-inch parkway drain. A proposed 6-inch storm drain along the northern site boundary, connecting all three biotreatment planter areas.
The proposed Project, similar to other projects developed pursuant to the General Plan, would be required to implement a WQMP. The WQMP would reduce discharge of stormwater into urban runoff from the operational phase by managing site runoff volumes and flow rates through application of appropriate best management practices. BMPs would be designed in accordance with the NPDES requirements. Any drainage facilities would also be designed in accordance with Section 19.28.080 of the City's Municipal Code, set forth in SC UTIL-2. Therefore, stormwater runoff expected at buildout of the proposed Project would not exceed existing storm drainage capacities. The proposed Project would not result in any new adverse impacts or increase the severity of any previously identified impacts related to storm waterdrainage. No new information of substantial importancethat was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impact the prior finding under this threshold. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Telecommunications
General Plan Significance Determination: No Impact. Telecommunications are provided by Spectrum, Cox, and Google Fiber. Local telecommunications companies operate and maintain transmission and distribution infrastructure in the area, which currently serves the project site. The previous General Plan Program EIR did not analyze impacts associated with the construction or relocation of telecommunication infrastructure.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
The proposed Project would not require relocation or construction of new telecommunication facilities.
The Project would connect to existing connections for services. No impact would occur.
Threshold (b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and reasonably foreseeable futuredevelopmentdu ring normal, dry and multipledryyears? General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. According to the City of Newport Beach's 2005 Urban Water Management Plan referenced in the General Plan Program El R, water supplies would continue to meet the City's imported water needs until year 2030. OCWD, which provides the groundwater supply tothe City, projects that there would be sufficient groundwater supplies to meet any future demand requirements in Newport Beach. The water supply impact associated with t he City's water service boundaries within the General Plan Planning Area is less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
176 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Water service is provided to the project site and surrounding area bythe Cityof Newport Beach. The 2020 UW Mknd that the City's supply capabilities are expected to balance anticipated total water use and supply and to accommodate normal years, single dry years, and multiple dry -year events. The UW MP indicated that there is adequate existing and planned water supply to accommodate future development as set forth in the General Plan inclusive of the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation for the 6th Cycle planning period of 2021-2029 and its associated water demands. Table 3.17-6, Drought Risk Assessment identifies supply and demand forecasts between 2021 and 2025.
Table 3.17-6: Drought Risk Assessment (AF)
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Supply Totals
15,876
15,846
15,817
15,787
15,758
Demand Totals
15,876
15,846
15,817
15,787
15,758
Difference 0 0
AF = acre-feet
Source: Newport Beach UWMPTable 7-5, 2021
0 0
0 As previously identified in Table 3.17-3, the proposed Project would generate an increase in water demand of 75.8 AFY for the project site, which does not account for the water use associated with the existing office building. The City's 2020 UW Wind that water supplies are sufficient to meet the 2045 projected water demand for its service residents during normal years, single dry years, and multiple dry - year events. The Project is consistent with the growth projected in the General Plan and therefore demand from the Project is accounted for in the 2020 UW WMerefore, the City's existing and future water supply is able to accommodate the increased water demand associated with the proposed Project. Impacts are less than significant. The proposed Project would not result in any new adverse impacts or increase the severityof any previously identified impacts for the provision of water. No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impact the priorfinding under this threshold. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent withthe effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Threshold (c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded a less than significant impact related to wastewater treatment capacity. The additional
4.12 mgd from buildout of the General Plan was nominal compared to the capacities of the two plants. In addition, policies within the General Plan require adequate wastewater facilities and conveyance systems to be available to the City residents through renovations, installations, and improvements when needed.
Therefore, impacts were determined less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
As mentioned above, the incremental increase in wastewater generated bythe proposed Project could be accommodated by OCSD's treatment plants (Table 3.17-5). The City requires NPDES permits, which set limits on allowable concentrations in any wastewater discharge. The City's Municipal Code also requires dwelling units and commercial uses to connect to the City's public sewer network and prohibits certain 177 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
polluting substances from being discharged into a public sewer. The proposed Project, similar to development in accordance with the General Plan, would be required to comply with all provisions of the NPDES program and the Municipal Code and would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impact the prior finding under this threshold. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Threshold (d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainmentof solid waste reduction goals?
General Plan Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact. The General Plan Program EIR found that impacts on existing solid waste facilities from project -generated solid waste were less than significant. Development of the General Plan would result in an additional 21,659 tons per year of solid waste to be disposed of at the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, which represented approximately
0.68 percent of the solid waste accepted annually at the landfill. Based on the landfill's 16-year lifespan and remaining capacityof approximately44.6 million tons at the time the previous ElRwas pre pared, the increase in solid waste generated from buildout of the General Plan was considered less than significant.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: Less than Significant Impact; no substantial changefrom previous analysis.
The Bowerman Landfill has a maximum permitted disposal of 11,500 tons per day. The landfill has a remaining capacityof 205,000,000cubic yards with a closure date of December3l, 2053.21 As identified in Table 3.17-7, Estimated Solid Waste Generation, the proposed Project would generate approximately 1,200 pounds of solid waste per day (0.6 ton per day or 226 tons/year). The estimated refuse generation for the Project is less than 0.01 percent of the landfill's annual tons per day average. The proposed Project's development intensity is consistent with the City's development assumptions, which are used by the County of Orange in their long-term planning for landfill capacity. The County's landfill system has capacity in excess of the required 15-year threshold established by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery. Based on the remaining capacity of the Bowerman Landfill and the County's long-term planning programs required to meet CalRecycle requirements, there would be adequate waste disposal capacitywithin the permitted County's landfill system to meet the needs of the proposed Project. No significant impacts are anticipated.
Table 3.17-7: Estimated Solid Waste Generation
Units/square feet (sf)
Solid Waste Generation Rate
Solid Waste Generation
193 units: multi -family residential
6.41 Ibs/unit/day
1,237.13lbs/day
Total
1,237.13 Ibs/day(226tons/yr)
Source: City of Newport Beach General Plan Program EIR, 2006. n CalRecycle, SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details, Available at:
https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/2767?siteID=2103 , Accessed September29, 2021. 178 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
The proposed Project, similar to other projects developed pursuant to the General Plan, would comply with the California Green Building Standards and AB 341. The 2019 California Green Building Standards Code requires that at least 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste from residential construction operations be recycled and/or salvagedfor reuse. AB 341 mandates a statewide solid waste diversion rate of 75 percent by 2020. No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impact the prior finding under this threshold. Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Threshold (e) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
General Plan Significance Determination: No Impact. The General Plan Program EIR concluded that no impacts would occur related to compliance with federal, state, and local regulations. AB 939, the Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (PRC §40000 et seq.) required all local governments to develop source reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting programs to reduce tonnage of solid waste going to landfills. Cities were required to divert at least 50 percent of all solid waste generated by Januaryl, 2000.
AB 1327, the California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991 (PRC §§42900 et seq.), required the California Integrated Waste Management Board to develop a model ordinance requiring adequate areas for the collection and loading of recyclable materials in development projects. Local agencies were then required to adopt and enforce either the model ordinance or an ordinance of their own by September 1, 1993. Chapter 6.06 of the City's Municipal Code includes waste recycling requirements in conformance with AB 1327. The City consistently diverts 50 percent or more of solid waste and, therefore, complies with this legislation. Therefore, no impacts were identified.
Project -Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No impact; no substantial change from previous analysis.
Compliance with AB 939 is measured for each jurisdiction, in part, as actual disposal amounts compared to target disposal amounts. Target disposal rates for the City are 9.6 pounds per day (ppd) per resident.
Actual disposal rates in 2018 were 6.9 ppd per resident. Therefore, solid waste diversion in Newport Beach is consistent with AB 939 and the Project's solid waste generation would be consistent with AB 939 and AB 1327. The proposed Project, similar to all projects, is required to recycle construction waste in compliance with the 2019 California Green Building Code, store and collect recyclable materials in compliance with AB 341 and handle green waste in accordance with AB 1826 (2014). AB 1826 requires businesses, including multi -family developments, to recycle organic waste and for locaIjurisdictions across to implement organic waste recycling programs to divert organic waste generated by businesses.
California's definition of "organic waste" is food waste, green waste, landscape and pruning waste, nonhazardous wood waste, andfood-soiled paper wastethat is mixed in with food waste.
SB 1383 (2016) establishes targets to achieve a 50 percent reduction in the level of the statewide disposal of organic waste from the 2014 level by 2020 and a 75 percent reduction by 2025. The law grants CalRecycle the regulatory authority required to achieve the organic waste disposal reduction targets and establishes an additional target that not less than 20 percent of currently disposed edible food is recovered for human consumption by 2025. CalRecycle's regulations to meet the organic waste reduction targets for2020 and 2025 took effect and are enforceable as of January 1, 2022. 179 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified that would impactthe prior finding under this threshold.
Therefore, the proposed Project would be consistent with the effects of implementation of the General Plan.
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed above, the proposed Project would not cause a utilities impact to occur, nor an increase in the severity of any utilities impacts previously disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR, with implementation of the mitigation measures discussed in this section. Implementation of the proposed Project would not alterthe conclusions of the General Plan Program EIR analysis and would not result in a new or substantially more severe project -specific or cumulative utility impact than those already analyzed.
Mitigation Program
Relevant General Plan Policies
Consistent with the General Plan Program EIR, the following policies are applicable to the proposed Project and would be made conditions of approval.
The policies below are applicable to this Project.
■ LU 2.8Adequate Infrastructure: Accommodate the types, densities, and mixof land usesthatcan be adequately supported by transportation and utility infrastructure (water, sewer, storm drainage, energy, and so on) and public services (schools, parks, libraries, seniors, youth, police, fire, and so on).
■ LU 3.2 Growth and Change: Enhance existing neighborhoods, districts, and corridors, allowing for re- use and infill with uses that are complementary in type, form, scale, and character. Changes in use and/or density/intensity should be considered only in those areas that are economically underperforming, are necessary to accommodate Newport Beach's share of projected regional population growth, improve the relationship, and reduce commuting distance between home and jobs, or enhance the values thatdistinguish Newport Beach as a special place to live for its residents.
The scale of growth and new development shall be coordinated with the provision of adequate infrastructure and public services, including standards for acceptable traffic level of service. ■ NR 3.4 Storm Sewer System Permit - Require all developmentto comply with the regulations under the City's municipal separate storm sewer system permit under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. (PolicyHB8.5)
■ NR 3.11 Site Design and Source Control - Include site design and source control BMPs in all developments. When the combination of site design and source control BMPs are not sufficient to protect water quality as required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), structural treatment BMPs will be implemented along with site design and source control measures. (Policy HB8.12)
■ NR 3.15 Street Drainage Systems - Require all street drainage systems and other physical improvements created bythe City, or developers of new subdivisions, to be designed, constructed, and maintained to minimize adverse impacts on water quality. Investigate the possibility of treating or diverting street drainage to minimize impacts to water bodies. (Policy H B8.16) 180 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Standard Conditionsand Requirements
SC UTIL-1 The project shall be required to comply with the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code Chapter 14.16 relatedto water conservation and supply level regulations in effect during the construction and operation of the project, and Municipal Code Chapter 14.17 with respectto water -efficient landscaping.
SC UTIL-2 The project shall be required to comply with Section 19.28.080 (Storm Drains) ofthe City's Municipal Code which requires developers to design and construct all drainage facilities necessary for the removal of surface water from the site (e.g., open/closed channels, catch basins, manholes, junction structures), and to protect off -site properties from a project's water runoff. The storm drain system must be designed in accordance with the standards of the Orange County Flood Division. A drainage fee is also charged to fund improvements to the City's drainage facilities.
SC UTIL-3 The Applicant shall prepare and obtain approval of a Construction and Demolition Waste Management Plan (CDWMD) for the project. The CWMP shall list the types and weights or volumes of solid waste materials expected to be generated from construction. The CDWMPshall include options to divert from landfill disposal, nonhazardous materials for reuse or recycling by a minimum of 65 percent of total weight or volume.
Conclusion
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to Utilities and Services or a substantial increase in the severityof a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regard to PRC Section 21166 and State CEQAGuidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior finding of less than significant with mitigation. Therefore, preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted.
181 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
3.18 Wildfire
The topic of Wildfire was not addressed in the General Plan Program EIR because the requirement to analyze in CEQA documents the potential impacts associated with proximity to very high fire hazard severityzones did not become effective until January 1, 2019, which was subsequent to the certification of General Plan Program EIR by the Newport Beach City Council in 2006. However, the General Plan identified areas with high and moderate fire susceptibility.
Threshold (a) If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. According to the CAL FIRE Hazard Severity Zone Map for Orange County, the project site is not within or proximate to Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ)zone for a Local Responsibility Area.
Additionally, General Plan Figure S4, Wildfire Hazards, shows that the project site is not within areas designated as High or Moderate fire susceptibility. Therefore, this threshold is not applicable to the proposed Project. No impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
Threshold (b) If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of wildfire? No Impact. As noted, the site is not within or proximate to a VHFHSZ. Therefore, this threshold is not applicable to the proposed Project. No impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
Threshold (c) If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities)that may exacerbatefire riskorthat may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
No Impact. As noted, the site is not within or proximate to a VHFHSZ. Therefore, this threshold is not applicable to the proposed Project. No impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
Threshold (d) If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post - fire slope instability, or drainage changes?
No Impact. As noted, the site is not within or proximate to a VHFHSZ. Therefore, this threshold is not applicable to the proposed Project. No impact would occur and no mitigation is required.
Cumulative Impacts
As discussed above, the project site is not within a VHFHSZ. Therefore, the proposed Project would not cause either a new cumulative impact to occur, nor cumulatively contribute towildfire impacts. 182 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 3
Environmental Impact Analvsis
Mitigation Program
General Plan Policies
General Plan policies related to wildfires identified in the General Plan Program EI R to mitigate potential impacts to wildfires are not applicable tot he Project.
Standard Conditionsand Requirements
No standard conditions are applicable to the proposed Project.
Conclusion
Accordingly, no new impacts relative to wildfires or a substantial increase in the severityof a previously identified significant impact evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur. With regard to PRC Section 21166 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the Project would not result in any new impacts, or increase the severity of the previously identified impacts. Additionally, no new information of substantial importancethat was not known and could not have been known at the time the General Plan Program EIR was certified is available that would impact the prior findings. Therefore, preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis is not warranted.
183 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 4
Determination
4 DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE CECIA DOCUMENTATION
The following discussion lists the appropriate subsections of Sections 15162 and 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and provides justification for the City of Newport Beach to make a determination of the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed Project, based on the environmental analysis provided a bove.
Section 15162— Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due tothe involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severityof previously identified significant effects.
The City of Newport Beach proposes to implement the Project within the context of the General Plan, as described in this Addendum. As discussed in the Environmental I mpact Analysis section of this Addendum, no new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects beyond what was evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR would occur that would require substantive revisions to the General Plan Program EIR. The proposed Project would not result in substantially increased impacts above what was evaluated in the General Plan Program EIR with regard to density and other environmental factors such as air quality, noise, public services, and utilities.
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severityof previously identified significant effects.
As documented herein, there have been no changes in circumstances under which the General Plan is being implemented since certification of the General Plan Program EIR; and none of the proposed Project elements would result in new or substantially more severe significant environmental effects than previously identified.
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant environmental effects not discussed in the previous El R or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
No new information that was not known atthe time the General Plan Program EIR was prepared is now available that demonstrates that the proposed Project will result in a new or increased significant impact.
Based on the analysis prepared for the proposed Project, the project -related effects would not be substantially more severe than were disclosed in the General Plan Program EIR as a result ofthe proposed Project. Implementation of the proposed Project within the context of the General Plan would not substantially increase the severityof previously identified impacts. 184 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 4
Determination
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or mores ignificant effects oft he project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or No mitigation measures or alternatives found infeasible in the General Plan Program El R are now feasible. (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
Nofeasible alternatives havebeen identified thatwould substantially reduce significant impacts.
Additional technical analyses were performed for the proposed Project and are the subject of this Addendum. Based on the analysis in this document, the proposed Project would not result in any new significant environmental effects that are substantially different from those identified in the General Plan Program EIR nor would it substantially increase the severityof significant effects previously identified in the General Plan Program EIR. None of the conditions listed under subsection (a) would occur that would require preparation of a subsequent environmental analysis. (b) Once a project has been approved, the lead agency's role in project approval is completed, unless further discretionary approvaIon that project is required. Information appearing after an approval does not require reopening of that approval. If after the project is approved, any of the conditions described in subsection (a) occurs, a subsequent ElRor negative declaration shall only be prepared by the public agency which grants the next discretionary approval for the project, if any. In this situation no other Responsible Agency shall grant an approval for the project until thesubsequent EIR has been certified or subsequent negative declaration adopted.
None of the conditions listed in subsection (a) would occur as a result of the proposed Project. Therefore, no subsequent environmental analysis is required.
Section 15164— Addendum to an EIR or Negative Declaration (a) The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent El R have occurred.
As described above, none of the conditions described in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent El R or Negative Declaration have occurred. (b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent El R or negative declaration have occurred.
None of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration would occur as a result of the proposed Project. Therefore, an Addendum to the certified General Plan Program EIR is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed Project. (c) An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached tothe EI R or adopted negative declaration.
185 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 4
Determination
This Addendum will be attached tothe General Plan Program EIR and maintained in the administrative record files at the City of Newport Beach.
(d) The decision -making body shalIcons ider the Addendum with the EIR prior to making a decision on the project.
The City of Newport Beach would consider this Addendum with the General Plan Program EIR prior to making a decision on the proposed Project.
(e) A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an addendum to an EIR, the lead agency's required findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence.
This document provides substantial evidence for City of Newport Beach records to support the preparation of this Addendum for the proposed Project.
Therefore, preparation of subsequent environmental analysis is not required and the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed Project is this Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR. No additional environmental analysis or review is required for the proposed Project. This document will be maintained in the administrative record files at City of Newport Beach offices. 186 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 4
Determination
This page intentionally left blank.
187 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
5 PREPARERS
City of Newport Beach (Lead Agency)
100 Civic Center Drive
Newport Beach, California 92660
James Campbell, Deputy Director
Rosalinh Ung, Principal Planner
Chelsea Crager, Associate Planner
Tony Brine, P.E., T.E., CityTraffic Engineer
Socheata Chhouk, Civic Engineer
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
1100 W. Town & Country Road, Suite 700
Orange, California 92868
Dana C. Privitt, AICP, Project Manager
Brian Leung, Planning Analyst
Serina Lin, Planning Analyst
Achilles Malisos, Technical Studies Manager
Section 5
Preparers
188 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 5
Preparers
This page intentionally left blank.
189 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 6
References
6 REFERENCES
Airport Land Use Commission for Orange County. 2008. Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport.
2005 (July). Figure 1, Airport Planning Areas.
Arcadis. 2021 (May). Final Draft2020 Urban Water Management Plan. Prepared for the City of Newport Beach, CA.
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps. https://eg is.fire.ca.gov/FHSZ/. Accessed November 2, 2021.
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2018 (Aug).
Construction/Demolition and Inert Debris Tools and Resources. http://www.caIrecycle.ca.gov/swfacilities/CDI/Tools/CaIculations.htm .
Disposal Facility Inspection Reportfor the FrankR. Bowerman Landfill. SWIS Facility/Site Summary (ca.gov)
California Department ofTransportation (Ca ltrans). California Scenic Highway System Map. California State Scenic Highway System Map (arcgis.com).
EIP Associates. 2006 (April) City of Newport Beach General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report.
Prepared for the City of Newport Beach, CA.
2006 (July). City of Newport Beach General Plan. Prepared for the City of Newport Beach, CA.
Environmental Managements Strategies, Inc. 2021(April). Phase 1 En vironm ental Site Assessment for Office Building at 1300 Bristol Street North). Prepared for The Picerne Group.
Federal Aviation Administration. 2021 (Sept 9). Aeronautical Study No. 2021-AWP-13081-OE.
Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation.
Ganddini Group, Inc. 2021 (Nov). Picerne Residential Traffic ImpactAnalysis.
Kling Consulting Group, Inc. 2021 (April). Limited Feasibility Level Geotechnical Investigation for a Proposed Multi -Level Apartment Complex, 1300 Bristol Street N, Newport Beach, California.
Prepared for The Picerne Group.
Newport Beach, Cityof. 2021 (Nov). Newport Beach Municipal Code, as amended. http://www.codepublishing.com/CA/NewportBeach/ .
No date. City of Newport Beach Demographics and Statistics. https://www.newportbeachca.gov/i- am-a/visitor/about-newport-beach/demographics-and-statistics. —. 2014. City of Newport Beach Sewer System Management Plan. 2011. Cityof Newport Beach Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). 190 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
Section 6
References
2017. City of Newport Beach Paleontological and Archaeological Resource Protection Guidelines. https://www . newportbeachca.gov/home/showpublis heddocument/2437/636385647487800000.
Accessed 2021.
Newport Beach Fire Department. EMSDivision.
http://www.newportbeachca.gov/government/departments/fire-department/emergency- medical-services-division.
Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). 2021. Service Area. https://www.ocsd.com/about-us/general- information/service-area.
Regional Sewer Service. https://www.ocsd.com/services/regional-sewer-service . Accessed 2021.
Orange County Waste & Recycling. Active Landfills. Frank R. Bowerman Landfill I OC Waste & Recycling (oclandfills.com). Accessed 2021.
Orange County Water District (OCWD). 2015 (June). Orange County Water District Groundwater Management Plan 2015 Update.
Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy.
Southern California Edison (SCE). Overview - Who We Are. https://www.sce.com/about-us/who-we-are .
Accessed 2021.
Springbrook Realty Advisors, Inc. 2021 (Dec 3). 1300 Bristol Street Affordable Housing Implementation Plan and Density Bonus Application. Prepared for The Picerne Group.
Tait & Associates, Inc. 2021(Sept 24). Priority Project Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (pWQMP). Prepared for the KCN Management, LLC.
2021 (Aug 30). Sewer Capacity Study for 1300 Bristol St. N Newport Beach, CA 92660. Prepared for The Picerne Group.
The Picerne Group, Inc. Construction Management & Control Plan for 1300 Bristol. 191 Residences at 1300 Bristol Street
Addendum to the General Plan Program EIR
APPENDIXA
AIR QUALITY, GREENHOUSE GAS, AND ENERGY MODELING DATA
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod)
Orange County, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
151.87 + 1000sgft
; 0.66 151,869.00
i 0
_ - -- -- - - = — — i--------------+
Cit Park
y
0.31 + Acre
; 0.31 13,503.60
0 .____________________________________________________________ ______________________________--------------}------------------F--------------- r
Apartments Mid Rise
193.00
Dwelling Unit
1.00 239,394.00
552
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2025
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2Intensity 390.98 CH4Intensity 0.033 N20Intensity 0.004 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Per site plan
Construction Phase - Anticipated construction schedule
Demolition -
Grading -
Woodstoves - No wood burning per rule 445 SCAQMD
Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule Compliance Water Mitigation -
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Table Name
Column Name
tblConstDustMitigation
Clean Paved Road PercentRed uction
tblConstDustMitigation
: WaterUnpaved Road MoistureContent
tblConstDustMitigation
WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
•-----------------------------
tblConstructionPhase
Y----------------------------
NumDays
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
•-----------------------------
tblConstructionPhase
Y----------------------------
NumDays
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
•-----------------------------
tblFireplaces
Y----------------------------
NumberWood
------------------------------
tblGrading
4----------------------------
Material Exported
•-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Y----------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
•-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Y----------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
•-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Y----------------------------
LotAcreage
------------------------------
tblLandUse
4-----------------g----------
LotAcrea e
------------------------------
tblWoodstoves
4----------------------------
NumberCatalytic
•-----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
Y----------------------------
NumberNoncatalytic
2.0 Emissions Summary
Default Value
New Value
i 0
r
6 r
r
r
r
r
r
r
{------------10.00------------4--------------------------
79.00 r
---------- ---- ------------T-----------------
---------
151,869.00
---------- ---- ------------T-----------------
---------
239,394.00
{-------------3.49 ---------------- 4-----------0.66----------- r
r
r
9.65 0.00
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
lb/day
lb/day
1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1
2023 •1 1.5402 20.7155 14.4650 0.0509 8.1061 0.6888 8.7511 3.7040 0.6444 4.2989 0.0000 15,435.451 0.9849 0.5384 5,620.506 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 15,435.451 1 I i
5 1 5 I 1 1 5
1 I-
1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1
2024 •1 2.0187 1 13.0780 1 19.1459 1 0.0495 I 2.6319 1 0.4709 1 3.1028 1 0.7049 1 0.4538 1.1588 0.0000 14,894.519 1 4,894.519 1 0.4298 I 0.1745 i 4,957.270 2 1 2 I 1 1 6
1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I- 1 I 1
2025 •1 21.6639 1 13.5943 1 21.6498 1 0.0554 I 3.1013 1 0.4661 1 3.5674 1 0.8294 1 0.4507 1.2801 0.0000 15,496.814 1 5,496.814 1 0.4431 I 0.1778 i 5,560.873 7 1 7 I 1 1 1
Maximum
21.6639
20.7155
21.6498
0.0554
8.1061
0.6888
8.7511
3.7040
0.6444
4.2989
0.0000
5,496.814
5,496.814
0.9849
0.5384
5,620.506
7 7
5 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
lb/day
lb/day
1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I
2023 •1 1.5402 1 20.7155 I 14.4650 I 0.0509 1 4.0040 I 0.6888 1 4.6490 I 1.7318 I 0.6444 2.3267 � 0.0000 1 5,435.451 15,435.451 1 0.9849 1 0.5384 i 5,620.506 5 1 5 I 1 I 5
1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I
2024 •1 2.0187 1 13.0780 I 19.1459 I 0.0495 1 2.4975 I 0.4709 1 2.9684 I 0.6719 I 0.4538 1.1258 � 0.0000 1 4,894.519 14,894.519 1 0.4298 1 0.1745 i 4,957.270 2 1 2 I 1 I 6
1 I I I I 1 I I I I I
2025 •1 21.6639 1 13.5943 I 21.6498 I 0.0554 1 2.9424 I 0.4661 1 3.4085 I 0.7904 I 0.4507 � 1.2411 � 0.0000 1 5,496.814 15,496.814 1 0.4431 1 0.1778 i 5,560.873 7 1 7 I 1 I 1
Maximum
21.6639
20.7155
21.6498
0.0554
4.0040
0.6888
4.6490
1.7318
0.6444
2.3267
0.0000
5,496.814
5,496.814
0.9849
0.5384
5,620.506
7 7
5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
31.76 0.00
28.50 39.03
0.00 30.34
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Reduction
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
I I I I I I I I I I 1
Area •I 6.0140 I 2.9047 1 17.0812 I 0.0182 I 1 0.3083 I 0.3083 I I 0.3083 0.3083 0.0000 13,502.703 1 3,502.703 I 0.0941 1 0.0637 i 3,524.036 9 1 9 I 1 I 7
1 I I I I I I I I 1- I I 1
Energy •I 0.0636 I 0.5433 1 0.2312 13.4700e- I 1 0.0439 I 0.0439 I I 0.0439 0.0439 � I 693.5944 1 693.5944 I 0.0133 1 0.0127 � 697.7161 '1 I I I 003 I I I I I I I I 1
I I I
1 1-
I I I I I I I I I I 1
Mobile •I 2.7641 I 2.7495 1 27.8600 I 0.0669 I 7.5640 1 0.0447 I 7.6087 1 2.0162 I 0.0416 2.0577 16,985.908 1 6,985.908 I 0.3930 1 0.2654 i 7,074.820 3 Total
8.8417
6.1975
45.1724
0.0886
7.5640
0.3970
7.9610
2.0162
0.3938
2.4100
0.0000
11,182.20
11,182.20
0.5005
0.3418
111296.57
64 64
31 Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
I I I I I I I I I I 1
Area 46.0140 I 2.9047 1 17.0812 I 0.0182 1 1 0.3083 I 0.3083 1 I 0.3083 0.3083 � 0.0000 13,502.703 1 3,502.703 I 0.0941 1 0.0637 3,524.036 •;�1 I 1 I I I I 1 9 9 I I 7
II 1I
I
Energy •I 0.0636 0.5433 0.2312 3.4700e- 0.0439 0.0439 0.0439 0.0439 693.5944 693.5944 0.0133 0.0127 697.7161 1 I I I 003 I 1 I I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I I I I I 1
Mobile •I 2.7641 1 2.7495 1 27.8600 I 0.0669 1 7.5640 I 0.0447 I 7.6087 1 2.0162 1 0.0416 2.0577 16,985.908 1 6,985.908 I 0.3930 1 0.2654 i 7,074.820 1 1 1 1 1 I 3
Total
-11
8.8417
6.1975
45.1724
0.0886
7.5640
0.3970
7.9610
2.0162
0.3938
2.4100
0.0000
11,182.20
11,182.20
0.5005
0.3418
11,296.57
64 64
31 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
NOx
c0
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 • Demolition
'Demolition
13/1 /2023
1 4/1 /2023
5:
23 +
i
2 Site Preparation
'Site Preparation
14/2/2023
:5/1/2023
5:
21 +
i
i
3 •Grading
'Grading
15/2/2023
18/30/2023
5:
87:
+
i
i
4 • Paving
'Paving
i 8/31 /2023
1 12/31 /2023
5:
87 +
i
i
5 •Building Construction
'Building Construction
i 1/1/2024
15/22/2025
5:
364:
+
i
i
6 •Architectural Coating
:Architectural Coating
:2/1/2025
:5/22/2025
5. 79,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 19.69
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 87
Acres of Paving: 0.66
Residential Indoor: 484,773; Residential Outdoor: 161,591; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 9,112 (Architectural Coating - sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws
i 1 I
8.00 81 •
0.73 ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------ ---------------------------
Demolition +Rubber Tired Dozers
; 1y
8.001
247•
0.40 ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Demolition +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 3 i
8.00 97 •
0.37 ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Site Preparation +Graders
; 1 i
8.00 187•
0.41 ---------------------------- �--------------------------*----------------- ------------ --------------Ir
-------------
Site Preparation •Rubber Tired Dozers
1 7.00•
247•
0.40 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Site Preparation
-Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00-
97:
0.37 ---------------------
Grading
----------------
'Graders
; 1 ;
8.001
187,
0.41 ----------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Grading
'Rubber Tired Dozers
; 1
8.001
247,
0.40 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------
Grading
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 2
7.001
97,
0.37 ----------------------------------------------------- ' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
'Cement and Mortar Mixers
; 1
6.001
9. 0.56
-----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
+Pavers
; 1
6.001
130,
0.42 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------
Paving
'Paving Equipment
; 1
8.001
132,
0.36 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
'Rollers
; 1
7.001
80,
0.38 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------
Paving
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 1
8.001
97,
0.37 ----------------------------------------------------- ' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Building Construction
'Cranes
; 1
6.001
231,
0.29 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------
Building Construction
'Forklifts
; 1
6.001
89,
0.20 ----------------------------------------------------- ' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Building Construction
'Generator Sets
; 1
8.001
84,
0.74 -----------------------------------------------------_ ------------------------------_i
-------------------------
--------------
Building Construction
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 1
6.001
97,
0.37 ----------------------------------------------------- i ------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Building Construction
'Welders
; 3
8.001
46,
0.45 -------------------------------------------------------*-----------------E------------r------------- --------------
Architectural Coating
;Air Compressors
1 ;
6.00:
78:
0.48 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count I Number I Number I Number I Length I Length Length Class I Vehicle Class I Vehicle Class Demolition 5: 13.00; 0.00: 343.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00: LD_Mix HDT_Mix : HHDT -----------------------------;---------------------i----------=---------i----------4---------- ----------------------- i----------r Site Preparation 3: 8.00- 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00: LD_Mix : HDT_Mix HHDT Grading
--------------4
4;
i
i--------------------i----------4----------
10.00- 0.00: 4,548.00: 14.70:
6.90:
- -
20.00: LD_Mix
;
i----------r----------
: HDT_Mix ' HHDT
--------------
--------------4
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r---------- Paving
5;
13.00- 0.00: 0.00: 14.70:
6.90:
20.00: LD_Mix
i HDT_Mix : HHDT
----------------
--------------4
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r---------- Building Construction
7;
208.00- 48.00: 0.00: 14.70:
6.90:
20.00: LD_Mix
1 HDT_Mix : HHDT
E
Architectural Coating ;
1 42.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70,
6.90,
20.00,LD_Mix
HDT_Mix rHHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.2275 i 0.0000 3.2275 0.4887 i 0.0000 0.4887 0.0000 0.0000 ---------- ��--------------'-------------------------------------------------------- -----------'--------------------- Off -Road •i 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 i 0.0241 i 0.6766 0.6766 i 0.6328 0.6328 :-2,324.395 2,324.395 i 0.5893 i 2,339.127 9 i g i 8
Total
1.4725
14.3184
13.4577
0.0241
3.2275
0.6766
3.9042
0.4887
0.6328
1.1215
2,324.395
2,324.395
0.5893
2,339.127
9 9
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0311 1.7772 0.6092 8.3700e- 0.2601 0.0114 0.2715 0.0712 0.0110 0.0822 953.7646 953.7646 0.0962 0.1530 1,001.763 i i i i
003 i i i i i i i i i 2
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0366 0.0234 0.3981 i 1.2300e- 0.1453 i 7.4000e- 0.1461 0.0385 i 6.8000e- 0.0392 125.4904 125.4904 i 2.7200e- 2.6800e- i 126.3564 •� 003 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0677
1.8007
1.0073
9.6000e-
0.4054
0.0122
0.4176
0.1098
0.0116
0.1214
1,079.254
1,079.254
0.0990
0.1557
1,128.119
003
9 9
5 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust �i � � i � 1.3798 i 0.0000 1.3798 0.2089 i 0.0000 0.2089 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 i 0.0241 i 0.6766 0.6766 i 0.6328 0.6328 0.0000 1 2,324.395 2,324.395 i 0.5893 i 2,339.127 '�
i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 8
Total
1.4725
14.3184
13.4577
0.0241
1.3798
0.6766
2.0564
0.2089
0.6328
0.8417
0.0000
2,324.395
2,324.395
0.5893
2,339.127
9 9
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0311 1.7772 0.6092 8.3700e- 0.2483 0.0114 0.2597 0.0683 0.0110 0.0793 953.7646 953.7646 0.0962 0.1530 i 1,001.763 i i i i
003 i i i i i i i i i 2
Vendor �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0366 � 0.0234 � 0.3981 i 1.2300e- � 0.1377 i 7.4000e- � 0.1385 � 0.0367 i 6.8000e- 0.0374 � i 125.4904 � 125.4904 i 2.7200e- � 2.6800e- i 126.3564 •� 003 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0677
1.8007
1.0073
9.6000e-
0.3860
0.0122
0.3982
0.1050
0.0116
0.1166
1,079.254
1,079.254
0.0990
0.1557
1,128.119
003
9 9
5 3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.2637 i 0.0000 6.2637 3.0038 i 0.0000 3.0038 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1339 12.4250 6.6420 i 0.0172 0.5074 0.5074 0.4668 0.4668 1,666.057 1,666.057 i 0.5388 1,679.528 '�
i i i i i i i i ■ 3 i 3 i i i 2
Total
1.1339
12.4250
6.6420
0.0172
6.2637
0.5074
6.7711
3.0038
0.4668
3.4706
1,666.057
1,666.057
0.5388
1,679.528
3 3
2 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0225 0.0144 0.2450 i 7.5000e- 0.0894 i 4.6000e- 0.0899 0.0237 i 4.2000e- 0.0241 i 77.2248 77.2248 i 1.6800e- 1.6500e- 77.7578 i
•� � � � 004 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0225
0.0144
0.2450
7.5000e-
0.0894
4.6000e-
0.0899
0.0237
4.2000e-
0.0241
77.2248
77.2248
1.6800e-
1.6500e-
77.7578
004
004
004
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust �i � � i � 2.6777 i 0.0000 2.6777 1.2841 i 0.0000 1.2841 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1339 12.4250 6.6420 i 0.0172 0.5074 0.5074 0.4668 0.4668 0.0000 i 1,666.057 1,666.057 i 0.5388 1,679.528 3 3 i 2
Total
1.1339
12.4250
6.6420
0.0172
2.6777
0.5074
3.1851
1.2841
0.4668
1.7509
0.0000
1,666.057
1,666.057
0.5388
1,679.528
3 3
2 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0225 0.0144 0.2450 i 7.5000e- 0.0848 i 4.6000e- 0.0852 0.0226 i 4.2000e- 0.0230 i 77.2248 77.2248 i 1.6800e- 1.6500e- 77.7578 i
•� � � � 004 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0225
0.0144
0.2450
7.5000e-
0.0848
4.6000e-
0.0852
0.0226
4.2000e-
0.0230
77.2248
77.2248
1.6800e-
1.6500e-
77.7578
004
004
004
003
003
3.4 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 i 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 i 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 i 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 1,995.614 i 0.6454 2,011.750 '�
i i i i i i i i ■ 7 i 7 i i i 3
Total
1.3330
14.4676
8.7038
0.0206
7.0826
0.6044
7.6869
3.4247
0.5560
3.9807
1,995.614
1,995.614
0.6454
2,011.750
7 7
3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.1089 6.2299 2.1356 i 0.0293 0.9117 i 0.0401 0.9518 0.2497 i 0.0384 0.2880 3,343.305 3,343.305 i 0.3373 0.5363 i 3,511.559 7 i 7 i i i 1
Vendor �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0282 0.0180 0.3062 9.4000e- 0.1118 5.7000e- 0.1124 0.0296 5.3000e- 0.0302 96.5311 96.5311 2.1000e- 2.0600e- i 97.1972 i i i i
•� 004 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.1371
6.2479
2.4418
0.0303
1.0235
0.0407
1.0641
0.2793
0.0389
0.3182
3,439.836
3,439.836
0.3394
0.5384
3,608.756
8 8
3 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust �i � � i � 3.0278 i 0.0000 3.0278 1.4641 i 0.0000 1.4641 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 i 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 i 1,995.614 1,995.614 i 0.6454 2,011.750 7 7 i 3
Total
1.3330
14.4676
8.7038
0.0206
3.0278
0.6044
3.6322
1.4641
0.5560
2.0201
0.0000
1,995.614
1,995.614
0.6454
2,011.750
7 7
3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.1089 6.2299 2.1356 i 0.0293 0.8702 i 0.0401 0.9103 0.2395 i 0.0384 0.2779 3,343.305 3,343.305 i 0.3373 0.5363 i 3,511.559 7 i 7 i i i 1
Vendor �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0282 0.0180 0.3062 9.4000e- 0.1060 5.7000e- 0.1065 0.0282 5.3000e- 0.0287 96.5311 96.5311 2.1000e- 2.0600e- i 97.1972 i i i i
•� 004 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.1371
6.2479
2.4418
0.0303
0.9762
0.0407
1.0168
0.2677
0.0389
0.3066
3,439.836
3,439.836
0.3394
0.5384
3,608.756
8 8
3 3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 i 0.0136 0.3084 0.3084 0.2846 0.2846 1,297.688 1,297.688 i 0.4114 1,307.972 0 i 0 i i i 5
Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total
0.6446
6.2357
8.8024
0.0136
0.3084
0.3084
0.2846
0.2846
1,297.688
1,297.688
0.4114
1,307.972
0 0
5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0366 0.0234 0.3981 i 1.2300e- 0.1453 i 7.4000e- 0.1461 0.0385 i 6.8000e- 0.0392 125.4904 125.4904 i 2.7200e- 2.6800e- i 126.3564 •� 003 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0366
0.0234
0.3981
1.2300e-
0.1453
7.4000e-
0.1461
0.0385
6.8000e-
0.0392
125.4904
125.4904
2.7200e-
2.6800e-
126.3564
003
004
004
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 i 0.0136 0.3084 0.3084 0.2846 0.2846 0.0000 i 1,297.688 1,297.688 i 0.4114 1,307.972 0 i 0 i i i 5
Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total
0.6446
6.2357
8.8024
0.0136
0.3084
0.3084
0.2846
0.2846
0.0000
1,297.688
1,297.688
0.4114
1,307.972
0 0
5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0366 0.0234 0.3981 i 1.2300e- 0.1377 i 7.4000e- 0.1385 0.0367 i 6.8000e- 0.0374 125.4904 125.4904 i 2.7200e- 2.6800e- i 126.3564 •� 003 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0366
0.0234
0.3981
1.2300e-
0.1377
7.4000e-
0.1385
0.0367
6.8000e-
0.0374
125.4904
125.4904
2.7200e-
2.6800e-
126.3564
003
004
004
003
003
3.6 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 i 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 ■ i 2,001.921 2,001.921 i 0.3334 2,010.256 4 4 i 3
Total
1.4200
11.0639
12.5172
0.0221
0.4506
0.4506
0.4348
0.4348
2,001.921
2,001.921
0.3334
2,010.256
4 4
3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0478 � 1.6773 � 0.6923 i 8.4800e- � 0.3069 i 9.0300e- � 0.3160 � 0.0883 i 8.6400e- 0.0970 933.0545 933.0545 i 0.0569 0.1345 i 974.5439 •� 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.5510 0.3369 5.9365 i 0.0190 2.3250 i 0.0113 2.3363 0.6166 i 0.0104 0.6270 1,959.543 1,959.543 i 0.0395 0.0401 i 1,972.470 2 i 2 i i i 4
Total
0.5987
2.0142
6.6287
0.0275
2.6319
0.0203
2.6522
0.7049
0.0191
0.7240
2,892.597
2,892.597
0.0965
0.1745
2,947.014
8 8
3 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 i 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 ■ 0.0000 i 2,001.921 2,001.921 i 0.3334 2,010.256 4 4 i 3
Total
1.4200
11.0639
12.5172
0.0221
0.4506
0.4506
0.4348
0.4348
0.0000
2,001.921
2,001.921
0.3334
2,010.256
4 4
3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0478 � 1.6773 � 0.6923 i 8.4800e- � 0.2938 i 9.0300e- � 0.3028 � 0.0851 i 8.6400e- 0.0938 933.0545 933.0545 i 0.0569 0.1345 i 974.5439 •� 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.5510 0.3369 5.9365 i 0.0190 2.2037 i 0.0113 2.2150 0.5868 i 0.0104 0.5972 1,959.543 1,959.543 i 0.0395 0.0401 i 1,972.470 2 i 2 i i i 4
Total
0.5987
2.0142
6.6287
0.0275
2.4975
0.0203
2.5178
0.6719
0.0191
0.6910
2,892.597
2,892.597
0.0965
0.1745
2,947.014
8 8
3 3.6 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 i 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 2,002.152 i 0.3269 2,010.324 4 i 4
Total
1.3246
10.4128
12.4393
0.0221
0.3925
0.3925
0.3785
0.3785
2,002.152
2,002.152
0.3269
2,010.324
4 4
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0471 � 1.6690 � 0.6895 i 8.3100e- � 0.3069 i 9.0800e- � 0.3160 � 0.0883 i 8.6900e- 0.0970 915.5868 915.5868 i 0.0577 0.1325 i 956.5106 •� 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.5203 0.3053 5.5842 i 0.0184 2.3250 i 0.0108 2.3358 0.6166 i 9.9700e- 0.6266 1,911.626 1,911.626 i 0.0359 0.0377 i 1,923.755 Total
0.5674
1.9743
6.2737
0.0267
2.6319
0.0199
2.6518
0.7049
0.0187
0.7236
2,827.212
2,827.212
0.0936
0.1702
2,880.265
8 8
9 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 i 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 ■ 0.0000 i 2,002.152 2,002.152 i 0.3269 2,010.324 4 4 i 8
Total
1.3246
10.4128
12.4393
0.0221
0.3925
0.3925
0.3785
0.3785
0.0000
2,002.152
2,002.152
0.3269
2,010.324
4 4
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0471 1.6690 0.6895 i 8.3100e- 0.2938 i 9.0800e- 0.3029 0.0851 i 8.6900e- 0.0938 915.5868 915.5868 i 0.0577 0.1325 i 956.5106 •� 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.5203 0.3053 5.5842 i 0.0184 2.2037 i 0.0108 2.2145 0.5868 i 9.9700e- 0.5968 1,911.626 1,911.626 i 0.0359 0.0377 i 1,923.755 Total
0.5674
1.9743
6.2737
0.0267
2.4975
0.0199
2.5174
0.6719
0.0187
0.6906
2,827.212
2,827.212
0.0936
0.1702
2,880.265
8 8
9 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating �i 19.4960 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 i 2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 i 0.0154 281.8319 003
Total
19.6668
1.1455
1.8091
2.9700e-
0.0515
0.0515
0.0515
0.0515
281.4481
281.4481
0.0154
281.8319
j
j
003
j
j
j
1 1
1 j
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.1051 0.0617 1.1276 i 3.7000e- 0.4695 i 2.1900e- 0.4717 0.1245 i 2.0100e- 0.1265 386.0014 386.0014 i 7.2500e- 7.6100e- i 388.4506 •� 003 003 003 003 003 i
Total
0.1051
0.0617
1.1276
3.7000e-
0.4695
2.1900e-
0.4717
0.1245
2.0100e-
0.1265
386.0014
386.0014
7.2500e-
7.6100e-
388.7
003
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating �i 19.4960 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 i 2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 i 0.0154 281.8319 003
Total
19.6668
1.1455
1.8091
2.9700e-
0.0515
0.0515
0.0515
0.0515
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0154
281.8319
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.1051 0.0617 1.1276 i 3.7000e- 0.4450 i 2.1900e- 0.4472 0.1185 i 2.0100e- 0.1205 386.0014 386.0014 i 7.2500e- 7.6100e- 388.4506 •� 003 003 003 003 003 i
Total
0.1051
0.0617
1.1276
3.7000e-
0.4450
2.1900e-
0.4472
0.1185
2.0100e-
0.1205
386.0014
386.0014
7.2500e-
7.6100e-
388.7
003
003
003
003
003
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
NOx
I CO
I S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
•i 2.7641 i 2.7495 � 27.8600 i 0.0669 i 7.5640 i 0.0447 i 7.6087
� 2.0162
i 0.0416
2.0577
6,985.908 6,985.908 i 0.3930
i 0.2654 i 7,074.820
1 i 1 i
i i 3
Unmitigated
2.7641 2.7495 27.8600 0.0669 7.5640 0.0447
7.6087
2.0162
0.0416
2.0577
6,985.908 • 6,985.908 - 0.3930
0.2654 7,074.820
1 1
3 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise ; 1,049.92 947.63 789.37 3,410,611 3,410,611 ......................................---------------------- --------- --------------------- ------------------------ City Park ; 0.24 0.61 0.68 1,026 1,026
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .----------T . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,050.16
948.24
790.05
3,411,636
3,411,636
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose
I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 1 5.90
8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3
--
• .......................i
City Park ;
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r
16.60 8.40
- - - - - - - - - -
6.90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 33.00 I 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
...............i. ......r------------------- T
Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40
---------'
6.90 %-----------------'r--------�---------- --------- -------- --------------- -
0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.547453+ 0.060181: 0.185039: 0.126487: 0.024236: 0.006679: 0.014707: 0.004926: 0.000662: 0.000378: 0.024745: 0.000705: 0.003801 + i
Cit Park 0.547453- 0.060181- 0.185039- 0.126487- 0.024236- 0.006679- 0.014707• 0.004926- 0.000662• 0.000378- 0.024745, 0.000705- 0.003801
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.547453• 0.060181: 0.185039• 0.126487: 0.024236• 0.006679: 0.014707• 0.004926: 0.000662• 0.000378: 0.024745; 0.000705: 0.003801
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG
I NOx
I CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas •i 0.0636
i 0.5433 i 0.2312 3.4700e-
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
• i 693.5944 693.5944 0.0133
i 0.0127 697.7161
Mitigated
003
NaturalGas 0.0636
0.5433 0.2312 3.4700e-
- 0.0439
0.0439
- 0.0439
0.0439
693.5944 693.5944 0.0133
0.0127 697.7161
Unmitigated
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Mid 5895.55 ■i 0.0636 i 0.5433 0.2312 3.4700e- 0.0439 i 0.0439 0.0439 0.0439 693.5944 693.5944 i 0.0133 i 0.0127 i 697.7161 Rise 003 i
City Park i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 with Elevator
Total
0.0636
0.5433
0.2312
3.4700e-
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
693.5944
693.5944
0.0133
0.0127
697.7161
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Mid 5.89555 ■i 0.0636 i 0.5433 0.2312 3.4700e- 0.0439 i 0.0439 0.0439 0.0439 693.5944 693.5944 i 0.0133 i 0.0127 i 697.7161 Rise 003 i
City Park i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 with Elevator
Total
0.0636
0.5433
0.2312
3.4700e-
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
693.5944
693.5944
0.0133
0.0127
697.7161
003
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
I NOx
I CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated 6.0140 I 2.9047 I 17.0812I 0.0182I 0.3083
I 0.3083I
I 0.3083
0.3083
0.0000 3,502.703 I 3,502.703I 0.0941
.0361 ,
9 I 9 I
I I 7
I
Unmitigated
6.0140 2.9047 17.0812 0.0182 0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.0000 3,502.703 • 3,502.703 - 0.0941
• 0.0637 • 3,524.036
9 9
7 6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
lb/day
lb/day
I I I I I I I I I I I
Architectural •1 0.4220 I I I I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 I 0.0000 I I i 0.0000 Coatin g
----------- �I------- _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ --------------- i------- I_------ ______________--------------- I I I I 1 I I I I I I I
Consumer •1 4.7945 I I I I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 1 I 0.0000 I I i 0.0000 Products
1 I I I I I 1 I I I I------ I I I
Hearth •1 0.3185 I 2.7213 I 1.1580 I 0.0174 I I 0.2200 I 0.2200 I I 0.2200 0.2200 0.0000 13,474.000 13,474.000 I 0.0666 I 0.0637 i 3,494.644 'I I I I I I I I I • 1 Q 1 0 I I I 2
------------I_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______________i-------I_______ _______ _______ _______*------- I
I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I
Landscaping •0.4791 I 0.1834 I 15.9232 18.4000e- I I 0.0883 I 0.0883 I I 0.0883 � 0.0883 � 1 28.7039 I 28.7039 I 0.0275 I i 29.3925 'I I I I 004 I I I I I 1 I I 1 1
'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1
Total
6.0140
2.9047
17.0812
0.0182
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.0000
3,502.703
3,502.703
0.0941
0.0637
3,524.036
11 9
9 7
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
lb/day
lb/clay
Architectural •i 0.4220 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
Consumer •i 4.7945 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 i � i 0.0000 Products '� i
Hearth 0.3185 i 2.7213 1.1580 i 0.0174 0.2200 i 0.2200 0.2200 0.2200 0.0000 i 3,474.000 3,474.000 i 0.0666 0.0637 i 3,494.644 '� i i i i i i i i • 0 i 0 2
Landscaping •i 0.4791 i 0.1834 � 15.9232 i 8.4000e- i � 0.0883 i 0.0883 � i 0.0883 0.0883 � i 28.7039 � 28.7039 i 0.0275 � � 29.3925 '� 004 i i i i i • i i i
Total
6.0140
2.9047
17.0812
0.0182
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.0000
3,502.703
3,502.703
0.0941
0.0637
3,524.036
9 9
7 7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 12:08 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Summer EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators
IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod)
Orange County, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
151.87 + 1000sgft
; 0.66 151,869.00
i 0
_ - -- -- - - = — — i--------------+
Cit Park
y
0.31 + Acre
; 0.31 13,503.60
0 .____________________________________________________________ ______________________________--------------}------------------F--------------- r
Apartments Mid Rise
193.00
Dwelling Unit
1.00 239,394.00
552
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2025
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2Intensity 390.98 CH4Intensity 0.033 N20Intensity 0.004 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Per site plan
Construction Phase - Anticipated construction schedule
Demolition -
Grading -
Woodstoves - No wood burning per rule 445 SCAQMD
Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule Compliance Water Mitigation -
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Table Name
Column Name
tblConstDustMitigation
Clean Paved Road PercentRed uction
tblConstDustMitigation
: WaterUnpaved Road MoistureContent
tblConstDustMitigation
WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
•-----------------------------
tblConstructionPhase
Y----------------------------
NumDays
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
•-----------------------------
tblConstructionPhase
Y----------------------------
NumDays
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
•-----------------------------
tblFireplaces
Y----------------------------
NumberWood
------------------------------
tblGrading
4----------------------------
Material Exported
•-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Y----------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
•-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Y----------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
•-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Y----------------------------
LotAcreage
------------------------------
tblLandUse
4-----------------g----------
LotAcrea e
------------------------------
tblWoodstoves
4----------------------------
NumberCatalytic
•-----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
Y----------------------------
NumberNoncatalytic
2.0 Emissions Summary
Default Value
New Value
i 0
r
6 r
r
r
r
r
r
r
{------------10.00------------4--------------------------
79.00 r
---------- ---- ------------T-----------------
---------
151,869.00
---------- ---- ------------T-----------------
---------
239,394.00
{-------------3.49 ---------------- 4-----------0.66----------- r
r
r
9.65 0.00
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
lb/day
lb/day
1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1
2023 •I 1.5418 20.9823 14.4444 0.0509 8.1061 0.6889 8.7512 3.7040 0.6444 4.2991 0.0000 15,433.858 0.9845 0.5390 5,619.091 I I I I I I I I 15,433.858 I I i
2 1 2 I I I 1
I-
1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1
2024 •I 2.0702 I 13.1859 I 18.7676 I 0.0486 I 2.6319 I 0.4710 I 3.1028 I 0.7049 I 0.4539 1.1588 0.0000 14,802.382 14,802.382 I 0.4307 I 0.1774 i 4,866.005 3 1 3 I I I 1
1 1 I I I I 1 I I I- I I 1
2025 •I 21.7246 I 13.7048 I 21.2229 I 0.0544 I 3.1013 I 0.4661 I 3.5675 I 0.8294 I 0.4508 1.2802 0.0000 15,388.766 15,388.766 I 0.4441 I 0.1810 i 5,453.793 2 1 2 I I I 8
Maximum
21.7246
20.9823
21.2229
0.0544
8.1061
0.6889
8.7512
3.7040
0.6444
4.2991
0.0000
5,433.858
5,433.858
0.9845
0.5390
5,619.09,
2 2
1 Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
lb/day
lb/day
1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I
2023 •I 1.5418 1 20.9823 I 14.4444 I 0.0509 1 4.0040 I 0.6889 1 4.6491 I 1.7318 I 0.6444 2.3268 � 0.0000 15,433.858 15,433.858 1 0.9845 1 0.5390 i 5,619.091 2 1 2 I 1 I 1
1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I
2024 •I 2.0702 1 13.1859 I 18.7676 I 0.0486 1 2.4975 I 0.4710 1 2.9684 I 0.6719 I 0.4539 1.1258 � 0.0000 14,802.382 14,802.382 1 0.4307 1 0.1774 i 4,866.005 3 1 3 I 1 I 1
1 I I I I 1 I I I I I
2025 •I 21.7246 1 13.7048 I 21.2229 I 0.0544 I 2.9424 I 0.4661 1 3.4086 I 0.7904 I 0.4508 1.2412 � 0.0000 15,388.766 15,388.766 1 0.4441 1 0.1810 i 5,453.793 2 1 2 I I I 8
Maximum
21.7246
20.9823
21.2229
0.0544
4.0040
0.6889
4.6491
1.7318
0.6444
2.3268
0.0000
5,433.858
5,433.858
0.9845
0.5390
5,619.091
2 2
1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CalEEMOd) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
31.76 0.00
28.50 39.03
0.00 30.34
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Reduction
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
I I I I I I I I I I 1
Area •I 6.0140 2.9047 17.0812 0.0182 0.3083 0.3083 0.3083 0.3083 0.0000 13,502.703 3,502.703 0.0941 0.0637 i 3,524.036 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 I 1
9 1 9 I 1 I 7
1 I I I I I I I I 1- I I 1
Energy •I 0.0636 I 0.5433 1 0.2312 13.4700e- I 1 0.0439 I 0.0439 I I 0.0439 0.0439 � I 693.5944 1 693.5944 I 0.0133 1 0.0127 � 697.7161 '1 I I I 003 I I I I I I I I 1
I I I
1 I I I I I I I I 1- I I 1
Mobile •I 2.7448 I 2.9519 1 27.5603 I 0.0643 I 7.5640 1 0.0447 I 7.6087 1 2.0162 I 0.0416 2.0577 16,720.053 1 6,720.053 I 0.4051 1 0.2762 i 6,812.485 2 1 2 I 1 I 9
Total
8.8223
6.3999
44.8726
0.0860
7.5640
0.3970
7.9610
2.0162
0.3938
2.4100
0.0000
10,916.35
10,916.35
0.5125
0.3526
11,034.23
15 15
87 Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
I I I I I I I I I I 1
Area 46.0140 I 2.9047 1 17.0812 I 0.0182 1 1 0.3083 I 0.3083 1 I 0.3083 0.3083 � 0.0000 13,502.703 1 3,502.703 I 0.0941 1 0.0637 3,524.036 •;�1 I 1 I I I I 1 9 9 I I 7
II 1I
I
Energy •I 0.0636 0.5433 0.2312 3.4700e- 0.0439 0.0439 0.0439 0.0439 693.5944 693.5944 0.0133 0.0127 697.7161 1 I I I 003 I 1 I I I 1 I I I
I I I I I I I I I I 1
Mobile •I 2.7448 I 2.9519 1 27.5603 1 0.0643 1 7.5640 I 0.0447 I 7.6087 1 2.0162 1 0.0416 2.0577 16,720.053 1 6,720.053 1 0.4051 1 0.2762 6,812.485 2 I 2 I I I 9
Total
8.8223
6.3999
44.8726
0.0860
7.5640
0.3970
7.9610
2.0162
0.3938
2.4100
0.0000
10,916.35
10,916.35
0.5125
0.3526
11,034.23
11 15
15 87
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
NOx
c0
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 • Demolition
'Demolition
13/1 /2023
1 4/1 /2023
5:
23 +
i
2 Site Preparation
'Site Preparation
14/2/2023
:5/1/2023
5:
21 +
i
i
3 •Grading
'Grading
15/2/2023
18/30/2023
5:
87:
+
i
i
4 • Paving
'Paving
i 8/31 /2023
1 12/31 /2023
5:
87 +
i
i
5 •Building Construction
'Building Construction
i 1/1/2024
15/22/2025
5:
364:
+
i
i
6 •Architectural Coating
:Architectural Coating
:2/1/2025
:5/22/2025
5. 79,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 19.69
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 87
Acres of Paving: 0.66
Residential Indoor: 484,773; Residential Outdoor: 161,591; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 9,112 (Architectural Coating - sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws
i 1 I
8.00 81 •
0.73 ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
------------ ---------------------------
Demolition +Rubber Tired Dozers
; 1y
8.001
247•
0.40 ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Demolition +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 3 i
8.00 97 •
0.37 ------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Site Preparation +Graders
; 1 i
8.00 187•
0.41 ---------------------------- �--------------------------*----------------- ------------ --------------Ir
-------------
Site Preparation •Rubber Tired Dozers
1 7.00•
247•
0.40 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Site Preparation
-Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
1 8.00-
97:
0.37 ---------------------
Grading
----------------
'Graders
; 1 ;
8.001
187,
0.41 ----------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Grading
'Rubber Tired Dozers
; 1
8.001
247,
0.40 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------
Grading
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 2
7.001
97,
0.37 ----------------------------------------------------- ' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
'Cement and Mortar Mixers
; 1
6.001
9. 0.56
-----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
+Pavers
; 1
6.001
130,
0.42 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------
Paving
'Paving Equipment
; 1
8.001
132,
0.36 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
'Rollers
; 1
7.001
80,
0.38 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------
Paving
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 1
8.001
97,
0.37 ----------------------------------------------------- ' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Building Construction
'Cranes
; 1
6.001
231,
0.29 ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
-------------------------
--------------
Building Construction
'Forklifts
; 1
6.001
89,
0.20 ----------------------------------------------------- ' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Building Construction
'Generator Sets
; 1
8.001
84,
0.74 -----------------------------------------------------_ ------------------------------_i
-------------------------
--------------
Building Construction
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 1
6.001
97,
0.37 ----------------------------------------------------- i ------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Building Construction
'Welders
; 3
8.001
46,
0.45 -------------------------------------------------------*-----------------E------------r------------- --------------
Architectural Coating
;Air Compressors
1 ;
6.00:
78:
0.48 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count I Number I Number I Number I Length I Length Length Class I Vehicle Class I Vehicle Class Demolition 5: 13.00; 0.00: 343.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00: LD_Mix HDT_Mix : HHDT -----------------------------;---------------------i----------=---------i----------4---------- ----------------------- i----------r Site Preparation 3: 8.00- 0.00: 0.00: 14.70: 6.90: 20.00: LD_Mix : HDT_Mix HHDT Grading
--------------4
4;
i
i--------------------i----------4----------
10.00- 0.00: 4,548.00: 14.70:
6.90:
- -
20.00: LD_Mix
;
i----------r----------
: HDT_Mix ' HHDT
--------------
--------------4
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r---------- Paving
5;
13.00- 0.00: 0.00: 14.70:
6.90:
20.00: LD_Mix
i HDT_Mix : HHDT
----------------
--------------4
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r---------- Building Construction
7;
208.00- 48.00: 0.00: 14.70:
6.90:
20.00: LD_Mix
1 HDT_Mix : HHDT
E
Architectural Coating ;
1 42.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70,
6.90,
20.00,LD_Mix
HDT_Mix rHHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.2275 i 0.0000 3.2275 0.4887 i 0.0000 0.4887 0.0000 0.0000 ---------- ��--------------'-------------------------------------------------------- -----------'--------------------- Off -Road •i 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 i 0.0241 i 0.6766 0.6766 i 0.6328 0.6328 :-2,324.395 2,324.395 i 0.5893 i 2,339.127 9 i g i 8
Total
1.4725
14.3184
13.4577
0.0241
3.2275
0.6766
3.9042
0.4887
0.6328
1.1215
2,324.395
2,324.395
0.5893
2,339.127
9 9
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0293 1.8528 0.6159 8.3800e- 0.2601 0.0115 0.2716 0.0712 0.0110 0.0822 954.6267 954.6267 0.0961 0.1531 i 1,002.664 i i i i
003 i i i i i i i i i 5
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0400 0.0257 0.3708 i 1.1700e- 0.1453 i 7.4000e- 0.1461 0.0385 i 6.8000e- 0.0392 i 119.4903 119.4903 i 2.7900e- 2.8500e- 120.4090 •� � � � i
003 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0693
1.8786
0.9867
9.5500e-
0.4054
0.0122
0.4176
0.1098
0.0117
0.1214
1,074.117
1,074.117
0.0989
0.1560
1,123.073
003
0 0
5 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust �i � � i � 1.3798 i 0.0000 1.3798 0.2089 i 0.0000 0.2089 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.4725 14.3184 13.4577 i 0.0241 i 0.6766 0.6766 i 0.6328 0.6328 0.0000 1 2,324.395 2,324.395 i 0.5893 i 2,339.127 '�
i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 8
Total
1.4725
14.3184
13.4577
0.0241
1.3798
0.6766
2.0564
0.2089
0.6328
0.8417
0.0000
2,324.395
2,324.395
0.5893
2,339.127
9 9
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0293 1.8528 0.6159 i 8.3800e- 0.2483 i 0.0115 0.2597 0.0683 i 0.0110 0.0793 954.6267 954.6267 i 0.0961 0.1531 i 1,002.664 003 i i i i i i i i i 5
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0400 0.0257 0.3708 i 1.1700e- 0.1377 i 7.4000e- 0.1385 0.0367 i 6.8000e- 0.0374 i 119.4903 119.4903 i 2.7900e- 2.8500e- 120.4090 •� � � � i
003 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0693
1.8786
0.9867
9.5500e-
0.3860
0.0122
0.3982
0.1050
0.0117
0.1167
1,074.117
1,074.117
0.0989
0.1560
1,123.073
003
0 0
5 3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 6.2637 i 0.0000 6.2637 3.0038 i 0.0000 3.0038 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1339 12.4250 6.6420 i 0.0172 0.5074 0.5074 0.4668 0.4668 1,666.057 1,666.057 i 0.5388 1,679.528 '�
i i i i i i i i ■ 3 i 3 i i i 2
Total
1.1339
12.4250
6.6420
0.0172
6.2637
0.5074
6.7711
3.0038
0.4668
3.4706
1,666.057
1,666.057
0.5388
1,679.528
3 3
2 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0246 0.0158 0.2282 i 7.2000e- 0.0894 i 4.6000e- 0.0899 0.0237 i 4.2000e- 0.0241 i 73.5325 73.5325 i 1.7200e- 1.7500e- 74.0978 i
•� � � � 004 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0246
0.0158
0.2282
7.2000e-
0.0894
4.6000e-
0.0899
0.0237
4.2000e-
0.0241
73.5325
73.5325
1.7200e-
1.7500e-
74.0978
004
004
004
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust �i � � i � 2.6777 i 0.0000 2.6777 1.2841 i 0.0000 1.2841 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1339 12.4250 6.6420 i 0.0172 0.5074 0.5074 0.4668 0.4668 0.0000 i 1,666.057 1,666.057 i 0.5388 1,679.528 3 3 i 2
Total
1.1339
12.4250
6.6420
0.0172
2.6777
0.5074
3.1851
1.2841
0.4668
1.7509
0.0000
1,666.057
1,666.057
0.5388
1,679.528
3 3
2 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0246 0.0158 0.2282 i 7.2000e- 0.0848 i 4.6000e- 0.0852 0.0226 i 4.2000e- 0.0230 i 73.5325 73.5325 i 1.7200e- 1.7500e- 74.0978 i
•� � � � 004 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0246
0.0158
0.2282
7.2000e-
0.0848
4.6000e-
0.0852
0.0226
4.2000e-
0.0230
73.5325
73.5325
1.7200e-
1.7500e-
74.0978
004
004
004
003
003
3.4 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust 7.0826 i 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 i 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 i 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 1,995.614 1,995.614 i 0.6454 2,011.750 '�
i i i i i i i i ■ 7 i 7 i i i 3
Total
1.3330
14.4676
8.7038
0.0206
7.0826
0.6044
7.6869
3.4247
0.5560
3.9807
1,995.614
1,995.614
0.6454
2,011.750
7 7
3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.1026 6.4949 2.1590 i 0.0294 0.9117 i 0.0402 0.9519 0.2497 i 0.0385 0.2881 3,346.327 3,346.327 i 0.3369 0.5368 i 3,514.718 8 i 8 i 6
Vendor �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0308 0.0198 0.2853 9.000Oe- 0.1118 5.7000e- 0.1124 0.0296 5.3000e- 0.0302 91.9157 91.9157 2.1500e- 2.1900e- i 92.6223 i i i i
•� 004 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.1333
6.5147
2.4443
0.0303
1.0235
0.0408
1.0643
0.2793
0.0390
0.3183
3,438.243
3,438.243
0.3391
0.5390
3,607.340
4 4
8 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Fugitive Dust �i � � i � 3.0278 i 0.0000 3.0278 1.4641 i 0.0000 1.4641 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.3330 14.4676 8.7038 i 0.0206 0.6044 0.6044 0.5560 0.5560 0.0000 i 1,995.614 1,995.614 i 0.6454 2,011.750 7 7 i 3
Total
1.3330
14.4676
8.7038
0.0206
3.0278
0.6044
3.6322
1.4641
0.5560
2.0201
0.0000
1,995.614
1,995.614
0.6454
2,011.750
7 7
3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.1026 6.4949 2.1590 i 0.0294 0.8702 i 0.0402 0.9104 0.2395 i 0.0385 0.2780 3,346.327 3,346.327 i 0.3369 0.5368 i 3,514.718 8 i 8 6
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0308 0.0198 0.2853 9.000Oe- 0.1060 5.7000e- 0.1065 0.0282 5.3000e- 0.0287 91.9157 91.9157 2.1500e- 2.1900e- i 92.6223 i i i i
•� 004 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.1333
6.5147
2.4443
0.0303
0.9762
0.0408
1.0170
0.2677
0.0390
0.3067
3,438.243
3,438.243
0.3391
0.5390
3,607.340
4 4
8 3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 i 0.0136 0.3084 0.3084 0.2846 0.2846 1,297.688 1,297.688 i 0.4114 1,307.972 0 i 0 i i i 5
Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total
0.6446
6.2357
8.8024
0.0136
0.3084
0.3084
0.2846
0.2846
1,297.688
1,297.688
0.4114
1,307.972
0 0
5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0400 0.0257 0.3708 i 1.1700e- 0.1453 i 7.4000e- 0.1461 0.0385 i 6.8000e- 0.0392 i 119.4903 119.4903 i 2.7900e- 2.8500e- 120.4090 i
•� � � � 003 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0400
0.0257
0.3708
1.1700e-
0.1453
7.4000e-
0.1461
0.0385
6.8000e-
0.0392
119.4903
119.4903
2.7900e-
2.8500e-
120.4090
003
004
004
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 0.6446 6.2357 8.8024 i 0.0136 0.3084 0.3084 0.2846 0.2846 0.0000 i 1,297.688 1,297.688 i 0.4114 1,307.972 0 i 0 i i i 5
Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total
0.6446
6.2357
8.8024
0.0136
0.3084
0.3084
0.2846
0.2846
0.0000
1,297.688
1,297.688
0.4114
1,307.972
0 0
5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0400 0.0257 0.3708 i 1.1700e- 0.1377 i 7.4000e- 0.1385 0.0367 i 6.8000e- 0.0374 i 119.4903 119.4903 i 2.7900e- 2.8500e- 120.4090 i
•� � � � 003 004 004 003 003 i
Total
0.0400
0.0257
0.3708
1.1700e-
0.1377
7.4000e-
0.1385
0.0367
6.8000e-
0.0374
119.4903
119.4903
2.7900e-
2.8500e-
120.4090
003
004
004
003
003
3.6 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 i 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 ■ i 2,001.921 2,001.921 i 0.3334 2,010.256 4 4 i 3
Total
1.4200
11.0639
12.5172
0.0221
0.4506
0.4506
0.4348
0.4348
2,001.921
2,001.921
0.3334
2,010.256
4 4
3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0461 1.7522 0.7141 i 8.4900e- 0.3069 i 9.0800e- 0.3160 0.0883 i 8.6900e- 0.0970 934.4607 934.4607 i 0.0568 0.1348 i 976.0366 •� 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.6042 0.3698 5.5363 i 0.0181 2.3250 i 0.0113 2.3363 0.6166 i 0.0104 0.6270 1,866.000 1,866.000 i 0.0405 0.0426 i 1,879.712 1 i 1 2
Total
0.6502
2.1221
6.2504
0.0266
2.6319
0.0204
2.6523
0.7049
0.0191
0.7240
2,800.460
2,800.460
0.0973
0.1774
2,855.748
9 9
8 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.4200 11.0639 12.5172 i 0.0221 0.4506 0.4506 0.4348 0.4348 ■ 0.0000 i 2,001.921 2,001.921 i 0.3334 2,010.256 4 4 i 3
Total
1.4200
11.0639
12.5172
0.0221
0.4506
0.4506
0.4348
0.4348
0.0000
2,001.921
2,001.921
0.3334
2,010.256
4 4
3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0461 � 1.7522 � 0.7141 i 8.4900e- � 0.2938 i 9.0800e- � 0.3029 � 0.0851 i 8.6900e- 0.0938 934.4607 934.4607 i 0.0568 0.1348 i 976.0366 •� 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.6042 0.3698 5.5363 i 0.0181 2.2037 i 0.0113 2.2150 0.5868 i 0.0104 0.5972 1,866.000 1,866.000 i 0.0405 0.0426 i 1,879.712 1 i 1 2
Total
0.6502
2.1221
6.2504
0.0266
2.4975
0.0204
2.5179
0.6719
0.0191
0.6910
2,800.460
2,800.460
0.0973
0.1774
2,855.748
9 9
8 3.6 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 i 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 2,002.152 2,002.152 i 0.3269 2,010.324 4 i 4
Total
1.3246
10.4128
12.4393
0.0221
0.3925
0.3925
0.3785
0.3785
2,002.152
2,002.152
0.3269
2,010.324
4 4
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 r
i i i i i i i i i i i
Vendor •i 0.0454 � 1.7438 � 0.7108 i 8.3200e- � 0.3069 i 9.1300e- � 0.3160 � 0.0883 i 8.7300e- 0.0971 i 916.9965 916.9965 i 0.0575 0.1328 i 958.0049 ■
•� 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.5723 0.3351 5.2113 i 0.0175 2.3250 i 0.0108 2.3358 0.6166 i 9.9700e- 0.6266 1,820.556 1,820.556 i 0.0369 0.0401 i 1,833.422 •�
003 8 8 i 1
Total
0.6176
2.0789
5.9221
0.0258
2.6319
0.0200
2.6518
0.7049
0.0187
0.7236
2,737.553
2,737.553
0.0944
0.1729
2,791.427
3 3
0 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Off -Road •i 1.3246 10.4128 12.4393 i 0.0221 0.3925 0.3925 0.3785 0.3785 ■ 0.0000 i 2,002.152 2,002.152 i 0.3269 2,010.324 4 4 i 8
Total
1.3246
10.4128
12.4393
0.0221
0.3925
0.3925
0.3785
0.3785
0.0000
2,002.152
2,002.152
0.3269
2,010.324
4 4
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0454 � 1.7438 � 0.7108 i 8.3200e- � 0.2938 i 9.1300e- � 0.3029 � 0.0851 i 8.7300e- 0.0938 916.9965 916.9965 i 0.0575 0.1328 i 958.0049 •� 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.5723 0.3351 5.2113 i 0.0175 2.2037 i 0.0108 2.2145 0.5868 i 9.9700e- 0.5968 1,820.556 1,820.556 i 0.0369 0.0401 i 1,833.422 •�
003 8 8 i 1
Total
0.6176
2.0789
5.9221
0.0258
2.4975
0.0200
2.5174
0.6719
0.0187
0.6906
2,737.553
2,737.553
0.0944
0.1729
2,791.427
3 3
0 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating �i 19.4960 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 i 2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481 i 0.0154 281.8319 003
Total
19.6668
1.1455
1.8091
2.9700e-
0.0515
0.0515
0.0515
0.0515
281.4481
281.4481
0.0154
281.8319
j
j
003
j
j
j
1 1
1 j
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.1156 0.0677 1.0523 i 3.5300e- 0.4695 i 2.1900e- 0.4717 0.1245 i 2.0100e- 0.1265 367.6124 367.6124 i 7.4400e- 8.0900e- i 370.2102 •� 003 003 003 003 003 i
Total
0.1156
0.0677
1.0523
3.5300e-
0.4695
2.1900e-
0.4717
0.1245
2.0100e-
0.1265
367.6124
367.6124
7.4400e-
8.0900e-
370.2102
003
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Archit. Coating �i 19.4960 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � � � 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 i 2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 i 0.0154 281.8319 003
Total
19.6668
1.1455
1.8091
2.9700e-
0.0515
0.0515
0.0515
0.0515
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0154
281.8319
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.1156 0.0677 1.0523 i 3.5300e- 0.4450 i 2.1900e- 0.4472 0.1185 i 2.0100e- 0.1205 367.6124 367.6124 i 7.4400e- 8.0900e- 370.2102 •� 003 003 003 003 003 i
Total
0.1156
0.0677
1.0523
3.5300e-
0.4450
2.1900e-
0.4472
0.1185
2.0100e-
0.1205
367.6124
367.6124
7.4400e-
8.0900e-
370.2102
003
003
003
003
003
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
I NOx
I CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
I Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated
•i 2.7448 2.9519 27.5603 i 0.0643 7.5640 i 0.0447
i 7.6087
� 2.0162
i 0.0416
2.0577
6,720.053 6,720.053 i 0.4051
0.2762 i 6,812.485
2 i 2 i
i i 9
Unmitigated
2.7448 2.9519 27.5603 0.0643 7.5640 0.0447
7.6087
2.0162
0.0416
2.0577
6,720.053 • 6,720.053 - 0.4051
• 0.2762 6,812.485
2 2
9 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise ; 1,049.92 947.63 789.37 3,410,611 3,410,611 ......................................---------------------- --------- --------------------- ------------------------ City Park ; 0.24 0.61 0.68 1,026 1,026
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .----------T . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 1,050.16
948.24
790.05
3,411,636
3,411,636
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose
I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Mid Rise
14.70 1 5.90
8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3
--
• .......................i
City Park ;
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r
16.60 8.40
- - - - - - - - - -
6.90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T 33.00 I 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
...............i. ......r-------------------7---------' Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40
6.90 %-----------------'r--------�---------- --------- -------- --------------- -
0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.547453+ 0.060181: 0.185039: 0.126487: 0.024236: 0.006679: 0.014707: 0.004926: 0.000662: 0.000378: 0.024745: 0.000705: 0.003801 + i
Cit Park 0.547453- 0.060181- 0.185039- 0.126487- 0.024236- 0.006679- 0.014707• 0.004926- 0.000662• 0.000378- 0.024745, 0.000705- 0.003801
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.547453• 0.060181: 0.185039• 0.126487: 0.024236• 0.006679: 0.014707• 0.004926: 0.000662• 0.000378: 0.024745; 0.000705: 0.003801
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG
I NOx
I CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
NaturalGas •i 0.0636
i 0.5433 i 0.2312 3.4700e-
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
• i 693.5944 693.5944 0.0133
i 0.0127 697.7161
Mitigated
003
NaturalGas 0.0636
0.5433 0.2312 3.4700e-
- 0.0439
0.0439
- 0.0439
0.0439
693.5944 693.5944 0.0133
0.0127 697.7161
Unmitigated
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Mid 5895.55 ■i 0.0636 i 0.5433 0.2312 3.4700e- 0.0439 i 0.0439 0.0439 0.0439 693.5944 693.5944 i 0.0133 i 0.0127 i 697.7161 Rise 003 i
City Park i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 with Elevator
Total
0.0636
0.5433
0.2312
3.4700e-
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
693.5944
693.5944
0.0133
0.0127
697.7161
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
lb/day
lb/day
Apartments Mid 5.89555 ■i 0.0636 i 0.5433 0.2312 3.4700e- 0.0439 i 0.0439 0.0439 0.0439 693.5944 693.5944 i 0.0133 i 0.0127 i 697.7161 Rise 003 i
City Park i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 with Elevator
Total
0.0636
0.5433
0.2312
3.4700e-
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
0.0439
693.5944
693.5944
0.0133
0.0127
697.7161
003
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
I NOx
I CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
lb/day
lb/day
Mitigated 6.0140 I 2.9047 I 17.0812I 0.0182I 0.3083
I 0.3083I
I 0.3083
0.3083
0.0000 3,502.703 I 3,502.703I 0.0941
.0361 ,
9 I 9 I
I I 7
I
Unmitigated
6.0140 2.9047 17.0812 0.0182 0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.0000 3,502.703 • 3,502.703 - 0.0941
• 0.0637 • 3,524.036
9 9
7 6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
lb/day
lb/day
I I I I I I I I I I I
Architectural •1 0.4220 I I I I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 � 1 I 0.0000 I I i 0.0000 Coatin g
----------- �I------- _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ --------------- i------- I_------ ______________--------------- I I I I 1 I I I I I I I
Consumer •1 4.7945 I I I I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 1 I 0.0000 I I i 0.0000 Products
1 I I I I I 1 I I I I------ I I I
Hearth •1 0.3185 I 2.7213 I 1.1580 I 0.0174 I I 0.2200 I 0.2200 I I 0.2200 0.2200 0.0000 13,474.000 13,474.000 I 0.0666 I 0.0637 i 3,494.644 'I I I I I I I I I • 1 Q 1 0 I I I 2
------------I_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______________i-------I_______ _______ _______ _______*------- I
I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I
Landscaping •0.4791 I 0.1834 I 15.9232 18.4000e- I I 0.0883 I 0.0883 I I 0.0883 � 0.0883 � 1 28.7039 I 28.7039 I 0.0275 I i 29.3925 'I I I I 004 I I I I I 1 I I 1 1
'I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1
Total
6.0140
2.9047
17.0812
0.0182
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.0000
3,502.703
3,502.703
0.0941
0.0637
3,524.036
11 9
9 7
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
lb/day
lb/clay
Architectural •i 0.4220 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
Consumer •i 4.7945 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 i � i 0.0000 Products '� i
Hearth 0.3185 i 2.7213 1.1580 i 0.0174 0.2200 i 0.2200 0.2200 0.2200 0.0000 i 3,474.000 3,474.000 i 0.0666 0.0637 i 3,494.644 '� i i i i i i i i • 0 i 0 2
Landscaping •i 0.4791 i 0.1834 � 15.9232 i 8.4000e- i � 0.0883 i 0.0883 � i 0.0883 0.0883 � i 28.7039 � 28.7039 i 0.0275 � � 29.3925 '� 004 i i i i i • i i i
Total
6.0140
2.9047
17.0812
0.0182
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.3083
0.0000
3,502.703
3,502.703
0.0941
0.0637
3,524.036
9 9
7 7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 29 Date: 11/11/2021 11:57 AM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Winter EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators
IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod)
Orange County, Annual
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
151.87 + 1000sgft
; 0.66 151,869.00
i 0
_ - -- -- - - = — — i--------------+
Cit Park
y
0.31 + Acre
; 0.31 13,503.60
0 .____________________________________________________________ ______________________________--------------}------------------F--------------- r
Apartments Mid Rise
193.00
Dwelling Unit
1.00 239,394.00
552
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2025
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2Intensity 390.98 CH4Intensity 0.033 N20Intensity 0.004 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Per site plan
Construction Phase - Anticipated construction schedule
Demolition -
Grading -
Woodstoves - No wood burning per rule 445 SCAQMD
Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Rule Compliance Water Mitigation -
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Table Name
Column Name
tblConstDustMitigation
Clean Paved Road PercentRed uction
tblConstDustMitigation
: WaterUnpaved Road MoistureContent
tblConstDustMitigation
WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
•-----------------------------
tblConstructionPhase
Y----------------------------
NumDays
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
•-----------------------------
tblConstructionPhase
Y----------------------------
NumDays
tblConstructionPhase
NumDays
•-----------------------------
tblFireplaces
Y----------------------------
NumberWood
------------------------------
tblGrading
4----------------------------
Material Exported
•-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Y----------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
•-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Y----------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet
•-----------------------------
tblLandUse
Y----------------------------
LotAcreage
------------------------------
tblLandUse
4-----------------g----------
LotAcrea e
------------------------------
tblWoodstoves
4----------------------------
NumberCatalytic
•-----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
Y----------------------------
NumberNoncatalytic
2.0 Emissions Summary
Default Value
New Value
i 0
r
6 r
r
r
r
r
r
r
{------------10.00------------4--------------------------
79.00 r
---------- ---- ------------T-----------------
---------
151,869.00
---------- ---- ------------T-----------------
---------
239,394.00
{-------------3.49 ---------------- 4-----------0.66----------- r
r
r
9.65 0.00
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1
2023 •I 0.1233 I 1.5048 I 1.1224 13.4300e- I 0.4665 I 0.0548 I 0.5213 I 0.2013 I 0.0506 0.2519 0.0000 1322.4500 1322.4500 I 0.0675 I 0.0230 i 330.9979 I I 1 I I I I I I
003 •
I I I I
•
I-
1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1
2024 •I 0.2646 I 1.7289 I 2.4733 16.4000e- I 0.3387 I 0.0617 I 0.4004 I 0.0909 I 0.0595 0.1503 0.0000 I 573.6236 1573.6236 I 0.0512 I 0.0211 i 581.2016 003 I I 1 I I • I I I I
'I I
1 I I I I 1 I I • I I I
1 1 I I I I 1 I I I- I I 1
2025 •I 0.8776 I 0.6856 I 1.0557 12.7100e- I 0.1501 I 0.0232 I 0.1732 I 0.0402 I 0.0224 0.0626 0.0000 I 243.8244 1243.8244 I 0.0203 18.3100e- i 246.8091 003 I I 1 I I : I I I 1 003 I
'I 1 I I I I 1 I I • I I I I I
Maximum
0.8776
1.7289
2.4733
6.4000e-
0.4665
0.0617
0.5213
0.2013
0.0595
0.2519
0.0000
573.6236
573.6236
0.0675
0.0230
581.2016
003
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I
2023 •I 0.1233 I 1.5048 I 1.1224 13.4300e- 1 0.2286 I 0.0548 1 0.2834 I 0.0941 I 0.0506 0.1447 � 0.0000 1322.4498 1322.4498 1 0.0675 1 0.0230 i 330.9977 003 I I I I I ■ I I I 1
■ I I I
1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I
2024 •I 0.2646 1 1.7289 I 2.4733 16.4000e- 1 0.3215 I 0.0617 1 0.3832 I 0.0866 I 0.0595 0.1461 � 0.0000 1573.6234 1573.6234 1 0.0512 1 0.0211 i 581.2013 003 I I I I I ■ I I I 1
■ I I I
1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I
2025 •I 0.8776 1 0.6856 I 1.0557 1 2.7100e- 1 0.1424 I 0.0232 1 0.1656 I 0.0383 I 0.0224 � 0.0607 � 0.0000 I 243.8243 1243.8243 1 0.0203 1 8.3100e- i 246.8090 'I 003 I I I I I ■ I I I 1 003 I
1 I I I I 1 I I ■ 1 I I I I
Maximum
0.8776
1.7289
2.4733
6.4000e-
0.3215
0.0617
0.3832
0.0941
0.0595
0.1461
0.0000
573.6234
573.6234
0.0675
0.0230
581.2013
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
27.51 0.00
24.00 34.10
0.01 24.38
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
Reduction
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 3-1-2023
5-31-2023
0.5861
0.5861
2 6-1-2023
8-31-2023
0.7235
0.7235
3 9-1-2023
11-30-2023
0.2257
0.2257
4 12-1-2023
2-29-2024
0.4038
0.4038
5 3-1-2024
5-31-2024
0.4978
0.4978
6 6-1-2024
8-31-2024
0.4960
0.4960
7 9-1-2024
11-30-2024
0.4941
0.4941
8 12-1-2024
2-28-2025
0.6830
0.6830
9 3-1-2025
5-31-2025
1.0470
1.0470
Highest
1.0470
1.0470
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 1.0159 0.0569 2.0049 3.2000e- 0.0138 0.0138 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 i 42.6495 42.6495 3.8800e- 7.2000e- � 42.9617 i � i i 6 � i �
•� 004 003 004 i
Energy •i 0.0116 i 0.0992 � 0.0422 i 6.3000e- i � 8.0200e- i 8.0200e- � i 8.0200e- 8.0200e- � 0.0000 i 392.5726 392.5726 i 0.0256 4.9500e- 394.6878 •� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Mobile •1 0.4647 i 0.5179 � 4.7979 i 0.0112 i 1.2852 � 7.7200e- i 1.2929 � 0.3431 i 7.1800e- 0.3502 � 0.0000 i 1,064.496 � 1,064.496 i 0.0632 � 0.0436 � 1,079.063 •1 003 003 6 6 i 6
Waste 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 18.0276 i 0.0000 18.0276 i 1.0654 0.0000 44.6627 Water •i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 3.9894 i 45.3852 49.3746 i 0.4136 0.0101 62.7356 Total
1.4921
0.6740
6.8450
0.0122
1.2852
0.0295
1.3147
0.3431
0.0290
0.3720
22.0170
1,545.103
1,567.120
1.5717
0.0594
1,624.111
9 9
3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 1.0159 0.0569 2.0049 3.2000e- 0.0138 0.0138 0.0138 0.0138 0.0000 i 42.6495 42.6495 3.8800e- 7.2000e- � 42.9617 i i i i
•� 004 003 004 i
Energy •i 0.0116 i 0.0992 0.0422 i 6.3000e- 8.0200e- i 8.0200e- 8.0200e- 8.0200e- 0.0000 i 392.5726 392.5726 i 0.0256 4.9500e- 394.6878 •� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Mobile •1 0.4647 i 0.5179 � 4.7979 i 0.0112 i 1.2852 � 7.7200e- i 1.2929 � 0.3431 i 7.1800e- 0.3502 � 0.0000 i 1,064.496 � 1,064.496 i 0.0632 � 0.0436 � 1,079.063 •1 003 003 6 6 i 6
Waste 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 18.0276 i 0.0000 18.0276 i 1.0654 0.0000 44.6627 Water •i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 3.1915 i 38.5805 41.7720 i 0.3311 8.1300e- 52.4725 003 i
Total
1.4921
0.6740
6.8450
0.0122
1.2852
0.0295
1.3147
0.3431
0.0290
0.3720
21.2191
1,538.299
1,559.518
1.4892
0.0574
1,613.848
11 1
3 2
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
3.62 0.44
0.49 5.25
3.38 0.63
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Num Days
Phase Description
Number
Week
1 • Demolition 'Demolition
i 3/1 /2023
: 4/1 /2023
5:
23 +
i
2 •Site Preparation 'Site Preparation
14/2/2023
:5/1/2023
5:
21 +
i
_
3 'Grading •Grading
T5/2/2023 T8/30/2023
5,
87,
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 4 • Paving • Paving • 8/31 /2023 •12/31 /2023 5 87
-------------------------------- ---------------------- T------------ T------------ T-------- T-------- T------------------------- 5 -Building Construction 'Building Construction 11/1/2024 :5/22/2025 5: 364:
+ i i
6 •Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating •2/1/2025 •5/22/2025 5. 79• Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 19.69
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 87
Acres of Paving: 0.66
Residential Indoor: 484,773; Residential Outdoor: 161,591; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 9,112 (Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1
! 8.00
81,
0.73 ---------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
--------------
Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1
8.00!
247,
0.40 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 ----------------------------
Demolition +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3
8.00!
97,
0.37 ------------
----------------------------
Site Preparation 'Graders ; 1
4 8.00!
187,
0.41 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 -------------
--------------
Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1
7.00!
247,
0.40 ------------
-------------
--------------
Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1
4 8.00!
97,
0.37 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 -------------
--------------
Grading 'Graders ; 1
8.00!
187,
0.41 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------
--------------
Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1y
8.00!
247,
0.40 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 -------------
--------------
Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 21
7.00!
97,
0.37 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 -------------
--------------
Paving 'Cement and Mortar Mixers ; 1
6.00!
9 : 0.56
+ __ _i
Paving Pavers ; 1
6.00!
_
130,
0.42 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 -------------
--------------
Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 1
8.00!
132,
0.36 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Paving 'Rollers ; 1y
7.00!
80,
0.38 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------
Paving +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 1y
8.00!
97,
0.37 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 -------------
--------------
Building Construction 'Cranes ; 1
6.00!
231,
0.29 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ----------------------------
Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 1
6.00!
89,
0.20 ----- ------ ------ ------ -----�--------------------------+-----------------F------------T------------- --------------
Building Construction •Generator Sets 1
8.00,
84,
0.74 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00; 97: 0.37 --------------------------------------------=----------------= - - -------------r-------------- Building Construction 'Welders ; 3: 8.001 46: 0.45
Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 6.00, 78, 0.48 Trips and VMT
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition
5;
13.00; 0.00: 343.00: 14.70;
6.90;
20.00:LD_Mix
HDT_Mix
IHHDT
---------------
Site Preparation
--------------;---------------------i----------=---------i----------4---------- 3;
8.00- 0.00: 0.00: 14.70;
-----------------------
6.90;
20.00:LD_Mix
----------T
IHDT_Mix
IHHDT
--------------
Grading
4;
--------------------i----------4----------------------------------
10.00 0.00: 4,548.00: 14.70:
6.90;
20.00: LD_Mix
'----------r
1 HDT_Mix
I HHDT
----------------------------4
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r---------- Paving
5;
13.00- 0.00: 0.00: 14.70:
6.90;
20.00: LD_Mix
i HDT_Mix
I HHDT
----------------
--------------4
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r---------- 1HDT_Mix
IHHDT
Building Construction
7;
208.00- 48.00: 0.00: 14.70:
6.90;
20.00:LD_Mix
E
Architectural Coating ;
1;
42.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70,
6.90,
20.00,LD_Mix
;HDT_Mix
rHHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Replace Ground Cover
Water Exposed Area
Water Unpaved Roads
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads
Clean Paved Roads
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0371 i 0.0000 0.0371 5.6200e- i 0.0000 5.6200e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003
Off -Road •i 0.0169 0.1647 0.1548 i 2.8000e- i 7.7800e- 7.7800e- i 7.2800e- 7.2800e- 0.0000 i 24.2496 24.2496 i 6.1500e- 0.0000 i 24.4032 •� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Total
0.0169
0.1647
0.1548
2.8000e-
0.0371
7.7800e-
0.0449
5.6200e-
7.2800e-
0.0129
0.0000
24.2496
24.2496
6.1500e-
0.0000
24.4032
004
003
003
003
003
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 3.5000e- 0.0215 7.0400e- i 1.000Oe- 2.9400e- i 1.3000e- 3.0800e- 8.1000e- i 1.3000e- 9.3000e- ■ 0.0000 i 9.9540 9.9540 i 1.000Oe- 1.6000e- 10.4550 004 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 003 003
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 4.2000e- 3.000Oe- 4.3600e- 1.000Oe- 1.6400e- 1.000Oe- 1.6500e- 4.4000e- 1.000Oe- 4.4000e- 0.0000 1.2635 1.2635 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- i 1.2732 �i i i i � i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 . 005 005 i
Total
7.7000e-
0.0218
0.0114
1.1000e-
4.5800e-
1.4000e-
4.7300e-
1.2500e-
1.4000e-
1.3700e-
0.0000
11.2175
11.2175
1.0300e-
1.6300e-
11.7282
004
004
003
004
003
003
004
003
003
j
003
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Demolition - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0159 i 0.0000 0.0159 2.4000e- i 0.0000 2.4000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003
Off -Road •i 0.0169 0.1647 0.1548 i 2.8000e- i 7.7800e- 7.7800e- i 7.2800e- 7.2800e- 0.0000 i 24.2495 24.2495 i 6.1500e- 0.0000 i 24.4032 •�
004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Total
0.0169
0.1647
0.1548
2.8000e-
0.0159
7.7800e-
0.0237
2.4000e-
7.2800e-
9.6800e-
0.0000
24.2495
24.2495
6.1500e-
0.0000
24.4032
004
003
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 3.5000e- 0.0215 7.0400e- 1.000Oe- 2.8100e- 1.3000e- 2.9400e- 7.7000e- 1.3000e- 9.000Oe- ■ 0.0000 i 9.9540 9.9540 1.000Oe- 1.6000e- 10.4550 i i
004 003 004 003 004 003 004 004 004 003 003
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 4.2000e- 3.000Oe- 4.3600e- 1.000Oe- 1.5600e- 1.000Oe- 1.5600e- 4.1000e- 1.000Oe- 4.2000e- 0.0000 1.2635 1.2635 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- i 1.2732 �i i i i � i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 . 005 005 i
Total
7.7000e-
0.0218
0.0114
1.1000e-
4.3700e-
1.4000e-
4.5000e-
1.1800e-
1.4000e-
1.3200e-
0.0000
11.2175
11.2175
1.0300e-
1.6300e-
11.7282
004
004
003
004
003
003
004
003
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0658 i 0.0000 0.0658 0.0315 i 0.0000 0.0315 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0119 0.1305 0.0697 i 1.8000e- i 5.3300e- 5.3300e- i 4.9000e- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 15.8699 15.8699 i 5.1300e- 0.0000 i 15.9982 •�
004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Total
0.0119
0.1305
0.0697
1.8000e-
0.0658
5.3300e-
0.0711
0.0315
4.9000e-
0.0364
0.0000
15.8699
15.8699
5.1300e-
0.0000
15.9982
004
003
003
003
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 ---------- ��--------------'-------------------------------------------------� --- �-------------'-- --------------------*--- --- Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 2.4000e- 1.7000e- 2.4500e- 1.000Oe- 9.2000e- 0.0000 9.3000e- 2.4000e- 0.0000 2.5000e- 0.0000 0.7099 0.7099 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- i 0.7154 �i i i i � i
004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 005 i
Total
2.4000e-
1.7000e-
2.4500e-
1.000Oe-
9.2000e.
0.0000
9.3000e-
2.4000e-
0.0000
2.5000e-
0.0000
0.7099
0.7099
2.000Oe-
2.000Oe-
0.7154
004
004
003
005
004
004
004
004
005
j
005
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust �i � � i � 0.0281 i 0.0000 0.0281 0.0135 i 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0119 0.1305 0.0697 i 1.8000e- i 5.3300e- 5.3300e- i 4.9000e- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 15.8699 15.8699 i 5.1300e- 0.0000 15.9982 •�
004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Total
0.0119
0.1305
0.0697
1.8000e-
0.0281
5.3300e-
0.0335
0.0135
4.9000e-
0.0184
0.0000
15.8699
15.8699
5.1300e-
0.0000
15.9982
004
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 ---------- ��--------------'-------------------------------------------------� --- -------'-- --------------------*--- --- �------
Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 2.4000e- 1.7000e- 2.4500e- 1.000Oe- 8.7000e- 0.0000 8.8000e- 2.3000e- 0.0000 2.4000e- 0.0000 0.7099 0.7099 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- i 0.7154 �i i i i � i
004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 005 005 i
Total
2.4000e-
1.7000e-
2.4500e-
1.000Oe-
8.7000e.
0.0000
8.8000e-
2.3000e-
0.0000
2.4000e-
0.0000
0.7099
0.7099
2.000Oe-
2.000Oe-
0.7154
004
004
003
005
004
004
004
004
005
j
005
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.3081 i 0.0000 0.3081 0.1490 i 0.0000 0.1490 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0580 0.6293 0.3786 i 9.000Oe- i 0.0263 0.0263 i 0.0242 0.0242 0.0000 i 78.7520 78.7520 i 0.0255 0.0000 i 79.3888 004 i i i i i ■ i i i i
Total
0.0580
0.6293
0.3786
9.000Oe-
0.3081
0.0263
0.3344
0.1490
0.0242
0.1732
0.0000
78.7520
78.7520
0.0255
0.0000
79.3888
004
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 4.6200e- 0.2851 0.0933 i 1.2800e- 0.0390 i 1.7500e- 0.0408 0.0107 i 1.6700e- 0.0124 ■ 0.0000 i 131.9854 131.9854 i 0.0133 0.0212 i 138.6276 •�
003 003 003 003 i
Vendor �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 1.2300e- 8.8000e- 0.0127 4.000Oe- 4.7800e- 2.000Oe- 4.8000e- 1.2700e- 2.000Oe- 1.2900e- 0.0000 3.6764 3.6764 8.000Oe- 9.000Oe- i 3.7046 i i i i
003 004 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 . 005 005 i
Total
5.8500e-
0.2860
0.1060
1.3200e-
0.0438
1.7700e-
0.0456
0.0120
1.6900e-
0.0137
0.0000
135.6618
135.6618
0.0134
0.0213
142.3322
003
003
003
003
j
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Grading - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1317 i 0.0000 0.1317 � 0.0637 i 0.0000 0.0637 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0580 0.6293 0.3786 i 9.000Oe- i 0.0263 0.0263 i 0.0242 0.0242 0.0000 i 78.7519 78.7519 i 0.0255 0.0000 i 79.3887 004 i i i i i ■ i i i i
Total
0.0580
0.6293
0.3786
9.000Oe-
0.1317
0.0263
0.1580
0.0637
0.0242
0.0879
0.0000
78.7519
78.7519
0.0255
0.0000
79.3887
004
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 4.6200e- 0.2851 0.0933 i 1.2800e- 0.0373 i 1.7500e- 0.0390 0.0103 i 1.6700e- 0.0120 ■ 0.0000 i 131.9854 131.9854 0.0133 0.0212 i 138.6276 •�
003 003 003 003 i
Vendor �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 1.2300e- 8.8000e- 0.0127 4.000Oe- 4.5300e- 2.000Oe- 4.5500e- 1.2100e- 2.000Oe- 1.2300e- 0.0000 3.6764 3.6764 8.000Oe- 9.000Oe- i 3.7046 i i i i
003 004 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 . 005 005 i
Total
5.8500e-
0.2860
0.1060
1.3200e-
0.0418
1.7700e-
0.0436
0.0115
1.6900e-
0.0132
0.0000
135.6618
135.6618
0.0134
0.0213
142.3322
003
003
003
003
j
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0280 0.2713 0.3829 i 5.9000e- 0.0134 0.0134 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 i 51.2101 51.2101 i 0.0162 0.0000 i 51.6159 004
Paving �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total
0.0280
0.2713
0.3829
5.9000e-
0.0134
0.0134
0.0124
0.0124
0.0000
51.2101
51.2101
0.0162
0.0000
51.6159
004
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 --------- ��--------------'-------------------------------------------------� --- -------'-- --------------------*--- --- �------
Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 1.1400e- 0.0165 5.000Oe- 6.2100e- 3.000Oe- 6.2400e- 1.6500e- 3.000Oe- 1.6800e- 0.0000 4.7793 4.7793 1.1000e- 1.1000e- 4.8160 i i i � i i
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 . 004 004 i
Total
1.6000e-
1.1400e-
0.0165
5.000Oe-
6.2100e-
3.000Oe-
6.2400e-
1.6500e-
3.000Oe-
1.6800e-
0.0000
4.7793
4.7793
1.1000e-
1.1000e-
4.8160
003
003
005
003
005
003
003
005
003
004
j
004
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0280 0.2713 0.3829 i 5.9000e- 0.0134 0.0134 0.0124 0.0124 0.0000 i 51.2100 51.2100 i 0.0162 0.0000 i 51.6159 004 i i i i i ■ i i i i
Paving �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total
0.0280
0.2713
0.3829
5.9000e-
0.0134
0.0134
0.0124
0.0124
0.0000
51.2100
51.2100
0.0162
0.0000
51.6159
004
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 --------- ��--------------'-------------------------------------------------� --- -------'-- --------------------*--- --- �------
Vendor •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 1.1400e- 0.0165 5.000Oe- 5.8900e- 3.000Oe- 5.9200e- 1.5700e- 3.000Oe- 1.6000e- 0.0000 4.7793 4.7793 1.1000e- 1.1000e- i 4.8160 i i i � i
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 . 004 004 i
Total
1.6000e-
1.1400e-
0.0165
5.000Oe-
5.8900e-
3.000Oe-
5.9200e-
1.5700e-
3.000Oe-
1.6000e-
0.0000
4.7793
4.7793
1.1000e-
1.1000e-
4.8160
003
003
005
003
005
003
003
005
003
004
j
004
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.1860 1.4494 � 1.6398 i 2.8900e- 0.0590 0.0590 0.0570 0.0570 0.0000 i 237.9108 237.9108 i 0.0396 0.0000 i 238.9013 003
Total
0.1860
1.4494
1.6398
2.8900e-
0.0590
0.0590
0.0570
0.0570
0.0000
237.9108
237.9108
0.0396
0.0000
238.9013
003
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 6.1400e- � 0.2302 � 0.0920 i 1.1100e- � 0.0396 i 1.1900e- � 0.0408 � 0.0114 i 1.1300e- 0.0126 ■ 0.0000 i 110.9557 � 110.9557 i 6.7600e- � 0.0160 i 115.8926 •�
003 003 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.0725 0.0494 0.7415 i 2.4000e- 0.2991 i 1.4800e- 0.3006 0.0794 i 1.3600e- 0.0808 ■ 0.0000 i 224.7572 224.7572 i 4.8100e- 5.1400e- 226.4077 •�
003 003 003 003 003
Total
0.0786
0.2796
0.8335
3.5100e-
0.3388
2.6700e-
0.3414
0.0909
2.4900e-
0.0934
0.0000
335.7129
335.7129
0.0116
0.0211
342.3003
003
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2024
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.1860 1.4494 � 1.6398 i 2.8900e- 0.0590 0.0590 0.0570 0.0570 0.0000 i 237.9105 237.9105 i 0.0396 0.0000 i 238.9010 003
Total
0.1860
1.4494
1.6398
2.8900e-
0.0590
0.0590
0.0570
0.0570
0.0000
237.9105
237.9105
0.0396
0.0000
238.9010
003
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 6.1400e- � 0.2302 � 0.0920 i 1.1100e- � 0.0379 i 1.1900e- � 0.0391 � 0.0110 i 1.1300e- 0.0122 ■ 0.0000 i 110.9557 � 110.9557 i 6.7600e- � 0.0160 i 115.8926 •�
003 003 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.0725 0.0494 0.7415 i 2.4000e- 0.2836 i 1.4800e- 0.2851 0.0756 i 1.3600e- 0.0770 ■ 0.0000 i 224.7572 224.7572 i 4.8100e- 5.1400e- 226.4077 •�
003 003 003 003 003
Total
0.0786
0.2796
0.8335
3.5100e-
0.3215
2.6700e-
0.3242
0.0866
2.4900e-
0.0891
0.0000
335.7129
335.7129
0.0116
0.0211
342.3003
003
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0676 0.5311 0.6344 i 1.1300e- 0.0200 0.0200 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 i 92.6324 92.6324 i 0.0151 0.0000 i 93.0105 003 i i i i i ■ i i i i
Total
0.0676
0.5311
0.6344
1.1300e-
0.0200
0.0200
0.0193
0.0193
0.0000
92.6324
92.6324
0.0151
0.0000
93.0105
003
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 2.3600e- � 0.0892 � 0.0357 i 4.2000e- � 0.0154 i 4.6000e- � 0.0159 � 4.4500e- i 4.4000e- 4.8900e- ■ 0.0000 i 42.3884 � 42.3884 i 2.6700e- � 6.1400e- � 44.2841 •1 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.0267 0.0174 0.2717 9.000Oe- 0.1165 5.5000e- 0.1170 0.0309 5.1000e- 0.0314 ■ 0.0000 i 85.3675 85.3675 1.7000e- 1.8800e- 85.9703 i i i i
•� 004 004 004 003 003
Total
0.0290
0.1066
0.3074
1.3200e-
0.1319
1.0100e-
0.1329
0.0354
9.5000e-
0.0363
0.0000
127.7559
127.7559
4.3700e-
8.0200e-
130.2544
003
003
004
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Building Construction - 2025
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0676 0.5311 0.6344 i 1.1300e- 0.0200 0.0200 0.0193 0.0193 0.0000 i 92.6323 92.6323 i 0.0151 0.0000 i 93.0104 003 i i i i i ■ i i i i
Total
0.0676
0.5311
0.6344
1.1300e-
0.0200
0.0200
0.0193
0.0193
0.0000
92.6323
92.6323
0.0151
0.0000
93.0104
003
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 2.3600e- � 0.0892 � 0.0357 i 4.2000e- � 0.0148 i 4.6000e- � 0.0152 � 4.2900e- i 4.4000e- 4.7300e- ■ 0.0000 i 42.3884 � 42.3884 i 2.6700e- � 6.1400e- � 44.2841 •1 003 004 004 003 004 003 003 003
Worker •i 0.0267 0.0174 0.2717 9.000Oe- 0.1104 5.5000e- 0.1110 0.0294 5.1000e- 0.0300 ■ 0.0000 i 85.3675 85.3675 1.7000e- 1.8800e- 85.9703 i i i i
•� 004 004 004 003 003
Total
0.0290
0.1066
0.3074
1.3200e-
0.1252
1.0100e-
0.1262
0.0337
9.5000e-
0.0347
0.0000
127.7559
127.7559
4.3700e-
8.0200e-
130.2544
003
003
004
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •i 0.7701 � � i � � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 6.7500e- 0.0453 0.0715 i 1.2000e- i 2.0300e- 2.0300e- i 2.0300e- 2.0300e- 0.0000 i 10.0854 10.0854 i 5.5000e- 0.0000 10.0991 •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 : 004
Total
0.7768
0.0453
0.0715
1.2000e-
2.03OOe-
2.0300e-
2.0300e-
2.0300e-
0.0000
10.0854
10.0854
5.5000e-
0.0000
10.0991
004
003
003
003
003
004
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 ---------- ��--------------'-------------------------------------------------� --- �-------------'-- --------------------*--- --- Vendor :1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 4.1700e- 2.7300e- 0.0425 1.4000e- 0.0182 9.000Oe- 0.0183 4.8400e- 8.000Oe- 4.9200e- 0.0000 13.3507 13.3507 2.7000e- 2.9000e- i 13.4450 i i i � i
003 003 004 005 003 005 003 . 004 004 i
Total
4.1700e-
2.7300e-
0.0425
1.4000e-
0.0182
9.000Oe-
0.0183
4.8400e-
8.000Oe-
4.9200e-
0.0000
13.3507
13.3507
2.7000e-
2.9000e.
13.4450
003
003
004
005
003
005
003
004
j
004
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.7 Architectural Coating - 2025
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating �i 0.7701 � � i � � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 6.7500e- 0.0453 0.0715 i 1.2000e- i 2.0300e- 2.0300e- i 2.0300e- 2.0300e- 0.0000 i 10.0853 10.0853 i 5.5000e- 0.0000 10.0991 •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 : 004
Total
0.7768
0.0453
0.0715
1.2000e-
2.0300e-
2.0300e-
2.0300e-
2.0300e-
0.0000
10.0853
10.0853
5.5000e-
0.0000
10.0991
004
003
003
003
003
004
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 ---------- ��--------------'-------------------------------------------------� --- �-------------'-- --------------------*--- --- Vendor :1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker 4.1700e- 2.7300e- 0.0425 1.4000e- 0.0173 9.000Oe- 0.0174 4.6000e- 8.000Oe- 4.6800e- 0.0000 13.3507 13.3507 2.7000e- 2.9000e- i 13.4450 i i i � i
003 003 004 005 003 005 003 . 004 004 i
Total
4.1700e-
2.7300e-
0.0425
1.4000e-
0.0173
9.000Oe-
0.0174
4.6000e-
8.000Oe-
4.6800e-
0.0000
13.3507
13.3507
2.7000e-
2.9000e.
13.4450
003
003
004
005
003
005
003
004
j
004
j
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG
I NOx
I CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
I Fugitive
PM2.5
I Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
tans/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated
•i 0.4647 0.5179 4.7979 i 0.0112 1.2852 i 7.7200e-
i 1.2929
0.3431
i 7.1800e-
0.3502
0.0000 i 1,064.496 1,064.496 i 0.0632
0.0436 i 1,079.063
•� 003
003
■ 6 6
i 6
Unmitigated
0.4647 0.5179 4.7979 0.0112 1.2852 7.7200e-
- 1.2929
0.3431
7.1800e-
0.3502
0.0000 1,064.496 • 1,064.496 - 0.0632
0.0436 1,079.063
003
003
6 6
6 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Mid Rise ; 1,049.92 ; 947.63 789.37 3,410,611 3,410,611 ......................................--------- ------------t-----------Y--------------------------------------------------- City Park ; 0.24 ; 0.61 0.68 1,026 1,026
......................................---------------------- ---------- --------------------- ------------------------ Enclosed Parking with Elevator ; 0.00 ; 0.00 T 0.00
Total 1,050.16
948.24
790.05
3,411,636
3,411,636
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
H-W or C-W
H-S or C-C
H-O or C-NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass -by
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70
5.90 8.70 40.20
19.20 40.60
86 11
3 ........................--------------------
City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 T 19.00
66 -------
28 r
------
6 .......................•--------------------T----------_------------------ Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00
--------T----------
0.00 ----------
0.00 0
--------- -----------------
0 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA I
LDT1 I
LDT2 I
MDV I
LHD1 I
LHD2 I
MHD I
HHD I
OBUS I
UBUS I
MCY I
SBUS I
MH
Apartments Mid Rise
0.5474536
0.060181:
0.185039:
0.126487:
0.024236:
0.006679:
0.014707:
0.004926:
0.000662:
0.000378:
0.024745:
0.0007051
0.003801
+
i
Cit Park
0.547453+
0.060181:
0.185039:
0.126487:
0.024236:
0.006679:
0.014707:
0.004926:
0.000662:
0.000378:
0.024745:
0.0007051
0.003801
+
i
Enclosed Parking with Elevator
0.547453•
0.060181-
0.185039•
0.126487-
0.024236•
0.006679-
0.014707•
0.004926-
0.000662•
0.000378-
0.024745•
0.000705-
0.003801
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
I CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity
.1
i i
�
i � 0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
i 277.7403 1 277.7403 1 0.0234 i 2.8400e- i 279.1731
Mitigated ,I
.
i i 003 i
Electricity .1 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 277.7403 1 277.7403 1 0.0234 i 2.8400e- i 279.1731
Unmitigated ,�
.
i
i 003 i
NaturalGas 0.0116 i 0.0992 i 0.0422 6.3000e- i 8.0200e- 8.0200e- i 8.0200e- 8.0200e- 0.0000 114.8323 114.8323 2.2000e- i 2.1100e- i 115.5147
1 Mitigated ,�
004
003
003
003
003 .
i
i 003 003 i
NaturalGas
0.0116
0.0992 0.0422
6.3000e-
- 8.0200e- 8.0200e- -
8.0200e-
8.0200e- 0.0000
114.8323 114.8323 2.2000e- - 2.1100e- 115.5147
Unmitigated
004
003
003
003
003
003 003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid I 2.15188e ■i 0.0116 i 0.0992 0.0422 6.3000e- 8.0200e- i 8.0200e- 8.0200e- 8.0200e- 0.0000 i 114.8323 114.8323 i 2.2000e- i 2.1100e- i 115.5147 Rise i +006 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 i
City Park i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 with Elevator
Total
0.0116
0.0992
0.0422
6.3000e-
8.0200e-
8.0200e-
8.0200e-
8.0200e-
0.0000
114.8323
114.8323
2.2000e-
2.1100e-
115.5147
004
003
003
003
003
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid I 2.15188e ■i 0.0116 i 0.0992 0.0422 6.3000e- 8.0200e- i 8.0200e- 8.0200e- 8.0200e- 0.0000 i 114.8323 114.8323 i 2.2000e- i 2.1100e- i 115.5147 Rise i +006 004 003 003 003 003 003 003 i
City Park i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 with Elevator
Total
0.0116
0.0992
0.0422
6.3000e-
8.0200e-
8.0200e-
8.0200e-
8.0200e-
0.0000
114.8323
114.8323
2.2000e-
2.1100e-
115.5147
004
003
003
003
003
003
003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
I
I
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 739929 •i 131.2232 i 0.0111 1.3400e- 131.9001 Rise 003
• ------- -------
City Park i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
• ----------------- --�------it----- *-------
Enclosed Parking 826167 ■i 146.5171 i 0.0124 1.5000e- 147.2730 with Elevator 003
Total
277.7403
0.0235
2.8400e-
279.1731
:
1 003
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Mitigated
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
I
I
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 739929 •i 131.2232 i 0.0111 1.3400e- 131.9001 Rise 003
• ------- -------
City Park i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
• - ----------------
Enclosed Parking 826167 ■i 146.5171 i 0.0124 1.5000e- 147.2730 with Elevator 003
Total
277.7403
0.0235
2.8400e-
279.1731
:
1 003
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied ROG
I NOx
I CO
I S02
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 1.0159 0.0569 2.0049 3.2000e-
0.0138
0.0138
0.0138
0.0138
0.0000 i 42.6495 42.6495 3.8800e- 7.2000e- 42.9617
i i
004
i i
i �
i
i
� i
�
i i
. i � � 003 004 i
-------------i
Unmitigated
1.0159 0.0569 2.0049 3.2000e-
- 0.0138
- 0.0138
0.0138
0.0138
0.0000 42.6495 42.6495 - 3.8800e- • 7.2000e- 42.9617
004
003 004
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Subcategory
tans/yr
MT/yr
Architectural •i 0.0770 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating•' ' i
----------%'------------------------------------------------------------------------------'---------------------------- *------- Consumer •i 0.8750 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products •' ' i
.
Hearth •i 3.9800e- i 0.0340 � 0.0145 i 2.2000e- i � 2.7500e- i 2.7500e- � i 2.7500e- � 2.7500e- � 0.0000 i 39.3945 � 39.3945 i 7.6000e- � 7.2000e- i 39.6286 •' 003 004 003 003 003 003 ' 004 004 i
Landscaping •i 0.0599 0.0229 1.9904 1.1000e- 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 � 0.0110 0.0000 i 3.2550 3.2550 3.1200e- 0.0000 i 3.3331 i � i i � i � i � � i �
�' 004 ' 003 i
Total
1.0159
0.0569
2.0049
3.3000e-
0.0138
0.0138
0.0138
0.0138
0.0000
42.6495
476495
3.8800e-
7.2000e-
42.9617
11 004
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 003
004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Subcategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural •i 0.0770 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
Consumer •i 0.8750 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 Products '� i
Hearth •i 3.9800e- 0.0340 0.0145 2.2000e- 2.7500e- 2.7500e- 2.7500e- 2.7500e- 0.0000 i 39.3945 39.3945 7.6000e- 7.2000e- 39.6286 i i i i
003 004 003 003 003 003 004 004 i
Landscaping •i 0.0599 0.0229 1.9904 1.1000e- 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 0.0110 6 0.0000 i 3.2550 3.2550 3.1200e- 0.0000 3.3331 i i i i
004 003
Total
1.0159
0.0569
2.0049
3.3000e-
0.0138
0.0138
0.0138
0.0138
0.0000
42.6495
42.6495
3.8800e-
7.2000e.
427617
11 004
003
004
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 41.7720
i 0.3311 8.1300e- i 52.4725
•�
003 i
- - - - - - - - �� ---- - +-----------------------------* - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 49.3746
0.4136 0.0101 62.7356
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
door Use
I
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Mid 12.5747 / •i 48.6469 0.4135 0.0101 62.0041 Rise i 7.92755 ;
•�
--------------
"' r------i�------- r """"""
City Park 0 / ■1 0.7278 6.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.7315
0.369359 ;i 005 005
----- •i--------------------- -
Enclosed Parking 0/0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
with Elevator
Total
49.3746
0.4136
0.0101
62.7356
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
door Use
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Mid i 10.0598 / •1 41.0886 0.3310 8.1300e- 51.7856 Rise 7.44396 :i i 003
------------�--------A-----------
City Park i 0 / •1 0.6834 6.000Oe- , 1.000Oe- i 0.6869
0.346828 :i 005 005
i
-------- J
Parking 0/0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
with Elevator
Total
41.7720
0.3311
8.1400e-
52.4725
003
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied CategoryNear
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 18.0276 i 1.0654 i 0.0000 44.6627
- - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------* - - - - - - - Unmitigated 18.0276 1.0654 0.0000 44.6627
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
I
I
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
88.78 •i 18.0215 1.0650 i 0.0000 44.6476
Rise
City Park
'------- -------
0.03 •1 6.0900e- 3.6000e- i 0.0000 0.0151
003 004
----------
'------- -------
Enclosed Parking
0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
with Elevator
Total
18.0276
1.0654
0.0000
44.6627
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
I
I
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Mid
88.78 •i 18.0215 1.0650 i 0.0000 i 44.6476
Rise
• '-------'-------
City Park
0.03 •1 6.0900e- 3.6000e- i 0.0000 0.0151
003 i 004
• -'-------'-------
Enclosed Parking
0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
with Elevator
Total
18.0276
1.0654
0.0000
44.6627
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators
IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 35 of 35 Date: 11/11/2021 12:15 PM Newport Beach, 1300 Bristol (CaIEEMod) - Orange County, Annual EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
Construction Fuel Consumption
1 On -Site Diesel
MTCOZe
a
Gallons of Fuel
Current County
Percent
Fuel
Demolition
24 2,404
Site Preparation/Grading
95 9,360
Building Construction
332
32,709
Paving
52 5,123
Architectural Coating
10 985
Total
513
50,581
144,020,787
0.0351%
Off -Site Diesel'
Demolition
10 1,030
Site Preparation/Grading
139
13,695
Building Construction
160
15,764
Paving
0 0
Architectural Coating
0 0
Total
309
1 30,488
1 144,020,787
0.0212%
Off -Site Gasoline
Demolition
1 144
Site Preparation/Grading
4 454
Building Construction
312
35,414
Paving
5 568
Architectural Coating
13 1,476
Total
335
38,056
1 1,180,213,295
0.0032%
Total Diesel Fuel 81,069 144,020,787 0.0563%
Total Gasoline Fuel 38,056 1,180,213,295 0.0032%
Total Construction Fuel 1,158 119,125
Demolition
Site Preparation
Grading
Construction Phase
On -Site Diesel
(Off -Road)
Off -Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off -Site Gas
(Worker)
On -Site Diesel
(Off -Road)
Off -Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off -Site Gas
(Worker)
On -Site Diesel
(Off -Road)
Off -Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off -Site Gas
(Worker)
2023
24 10
1 16
0 0
79 139
4 2024
2025
Total
24 10
1 16
0 0
79 139
4 Construction Phase
Building Construction
Paving
Architectural Coating
On -Site Diesel
(Off -Road)
Off -Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off -Site Gas
(Worker)
On -Site Diesel
(Off -Road)
Off -Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off -Site Gas
(Worker)
On -Site Diesel
(Off -Road)
Off -Site Diesel
(Hauling/Vendor)
Off -Site Gas
(Worker)
2023
52 0
5 2024
239
116
226
2025
93 44
86 10
0 13
2026
Total
1 332
160
312
1 52
0 5
1 10
0 13
Notes:
' Fuel used for off -road, hauling, and vendor trips assumed to be diesel.
Z Fuel used for worker trips assumed to be gasoline.
3 MTCOze rates from CalEEMod (3.0 Construction Details). 4 For CO2e emissions, see Chapter 13 (page 94); Conversion Ratios: Climate Registry, General Reporting Protocol, 2016.
Construction Water Energy
Daily Soil Disturbance'
2 acres
Days of Soil Disturbance
108
days
Water Concentration
3,020
gallons/acre
Water Energy Intensity
11,110
kWh/MG
Total Construction Water
0.65 million gallons
Construction Water Energy
7,247
kWh
0.0072
GWh
Notes:
1 Total daily acres disturbed from offroad equipment per CalEEMod (3.0 Construction Detail) and maximum SCAQMD LST values for soil -disturbing equipment.
` Number of days of construction with soil -disturbing equipment per CalEEMod (3.0 Construction Detail). 3 Water application rate per Air and Waste Management Association's Air Pollution Engineering Manual. 4 Water energy intensity factor for county subarea per CalEEMod User Guide, Appendix D, page D-343.
Operational Fuel
Vehicle Type
Passenger Cars
Light/Medium Trucks
Heavy Trucks/Other
Total
Percent'
Annual VMTZ
MPG3
Annual Fuel
(Gallons)
Fuel Type
Orange
4 Gallons
Orange
Percent
0.0069%
0.95 3,240,080
21.6 150,004
Gas
1,180,213,295
0.0127%
0.05 1701531
17.2 9,915
Diesel
144,020,787
0.0069%
0.00 0
6.1 0
1 Diesel
144,020,787
0.0000%
1.00 3,410,611
1 159,918
1,324,234,082
Land Uses
LDA
LDT1
LDT2
MCY
MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
OBUS
UBUS
SBUS
MH HHD
Apartments Mid Rise
0.54745
0.06018
0.18504
0.02475
0.12649
0.024236
0.006679
0.014707
0.000662
0.000378
0.000705
0.003801 0.004926
City Park
0.54745
0.06018
0.18504
0.02475
0.12649
0.024236
0.006679
0.014707
0.000662
0.000378
0.000705
0.003801 0.004926
Parking
0.54745
0.06018
0.18504
0.02475
0.12649
0.024236
0.006679
0.014707
0.000662
0.000378
0.000705
0.003801 0.004926
Notes:
' Percent of vehicle trip distribution based on fleet mix from CaIEEMod (4.4 Fleet Mix). z Total annual operational VMT based on mitigated annual VMT from CalEEMod (4.2 Trip Summary Information). 3 Average fuel economy derived from Department of Transportation. 4 Total annual county fuel per EMFAC 2017 model of projected operational fuel usage.
Operational Water Energy
Mitigated Indoor 10.0 million gallons
Indoor Energy Intensity Factor' 5,411 kWh/MG
Mitigated Outdoor 7 million gallons
Outdoor Energy Intensity Factor 11,110 kWh/MG
Operational Water Energy 131,880 kWh
s
Land Use
Unmitigated (MG)
Mitigated (MG)
Indoor
Outdoor
Indoor
Outdoor
Apartment Mid Rise
13 8
10 7
City Park
0 0
0 0
Parking
0 0
0 0
Total Operational Water
13 8
10 7
Notes:
' Indoor water energy intensity factor for county subarea per CaIEEMod User Guide, Appendix D, page D-343. Factor includes supply, treatment, distribution, and wastewater.
z Outdoor water energy intensity factor for county subarea per CaIEEMod User Guide, Appendix D, page D-343. Factor includes supply, treatment, and distribution.
3 Operational water use values per CaIEEMod (7.2 Water by Land Use).
Elecricity/Natural Gas Energy
Electricity (kWh/yr)
Natural Gas (kBTU/yr)
Natural Gas (therms/yr)
Mitigated Project
Annual Energy
1,566,096
2,151,880
21,519
Orange County
Percentage
Annual Energy3
Increase
20,196,974,897
0.0078
57,500,000,000
0.0037
575,000,000
0.0037
Land Use
Electricity' (kWh/yr)
Natural Gast (kBTU/yr)
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Apartment Mid Rise
739,929
739,929
2,151,880
2,151,880
City Park
0 0
0 0
Parking
826,167
826,167
0 0
Total Energy
1,566,096
1,566,096
2,151,880
2,151,880
Notes:
1 Electricity use per CalEEMod (5.3 Energy by Land Use). z Natural Gas use per CalEEMod (5.2 Natural Gas by Land Use). 3 County total energy values from California Energy Commission energy reports available through ecdms.energy.ca.gov.
APPENDIX B
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
PA2021-161
Limited Feasibility Level Geotechnical
Investigation for a Proposed Multi -Level
Apartment Complex,1300 Bristol Street
N, Newport Beach, CA 92660.
PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
KCGKLI NG
Consulting
Group, Inc.
PA2021-161
KCGKLI N G
Consulting
Group, Inc.
April 19, 2021
Mr. Dan Matula
The Picerne Group
5000 Birch Street,
Newport Beach, CA 92660
PN 21016-00
Subject: Limited Feasibility Level Geotechnical Investigation for a Proposed Multi -Level Apartment Complex, 1300 Bristol Street N, Newport Beach, CA 92660
Dear Mr Matula:
At your request and authorization, Kling Consulting Group, Inc. (KCG) has performed a limited feasibility level geotechnical investigation for a proposed multi -level apartment complex at 1300 Bristol Street N, Newport Beach, California (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). Our findings from subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and geotechnical analyses are presented herein. Preliminary conclusions and recommendations are provided regarding the existing geotechnical conditions and the design of the proposed development.
We appreciate this opportunity to be of continued service and to work with you on this project. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to call.
Respectfully,
KLING CONSULTING GROUP
Sean M. Webb
Staff Geologist/Engineer
Henry F. Kling
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
GE 2205 Expires 3/31/22
Jeffh-Y'P. Blake
Associate Engineering Geologist
CEG 2248 Expires 10/31/21
18008 Sky Park Circle, Suite 250, Irvine, California 92614 (949) 797-6241 Fax (949) 797-6260
PAm2Je
Upper
Back Bp
�
,.. ;
\#C LOCatiO
~°6 �
Pone m■
g (--*;Ic, D w_
k
4�
� w �
Vp �
v ®
t Sant f J !
66 Ana
r Heigh" A 'D
e�
,
q4
mow_
�mmtAr
:
. I -
Notes:
KLING
f � comultiDg
2�maker! G�um�.
ip
9-
Client:
f&Bomb The m,Group
p 2 / c(WA,
■ Address:
� � Bristol Street +�
b ° !
4® �14 Newport Beach
- ƒ G J� -
� ®�
¥%ƒ " ,% p / . NewP_t Scale: R=7qo'
��
f o _ 2600ft
Site Locationm@
Drawn:
&»
Date:
lmc,
P/N:amknFigure:
,
PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................... 4
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE................................................................................................. 4
1.2 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................................................................... 4
2.0 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS..................................................................................... 5
2.1 Subsurface Investigation and Sampling........................................................................... 5
2.2 Regional and Site Specific Geologic Setting................................................................... 5
2.3 Subsurface Conditions...................................................................................................... 6
2.3.1 Asphalt...................................................................................................................... 6
2.3.2 Old Paralic Deposits (Qopfa).................................................................................... 6
2.4 Groundwater.....................................................................................................................6
3.0 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS .................................... 7
3.1 Expansive Soil Characteristics......................................................................................... 7
3.2 Sulfate Content................................................................................................................. 7
3.3 Moisture and Density....................................................................................................... 7
3.4 Faulting and Seismicity.................................................................................................... 7
3.5 Seismic Design Parameters.............................................................................................. 7
3.6 Seismic Hazards............................................................................................................... 8
3.6.1 Liquefaction Potential............................................................................................... 8
3.6.2 Liquefaction Settlement Analysis............................................................................. 9
3.6.3 Lateral Spreading...................................................................................................... 9
4.0 CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................9
5.0 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................ 10 5.1 Supplemental Subsurface Exploration........................................................................... 11 5.2 Earthwork Specifications............................................................................................... 11 5.3 Remedial Earthwork....................................................................................................... 11 5.3.1 Foundation Design Option: Conventional Foundations —Two Levels Subterranean 11 5.3.2 Foundation Design Option: Mat Slab Foundations —Two Levels Subterranean .... 12 5.3.3 Proposed Pavement and Flatwork Areas................................................................ 12 5.4 Processing of Natural Soils and Fill Placement............................................................. 12 5.5 Proposed Building Foundations..................................................................................... 12 5.5.1 Subterranean -Conventional Shallow Foundations .................................................. 13 5.5.2 Subterranean- Mat Slab........................................................................................... 13 5.6 Settlement.......................................................................................................................14
5.7 Slab-On-Grade............................................................................................................... 14 5.7.1 Basement Slab on Grade Floors.............................................................................. 15 5.8 Permanent Subterranean Walls...................................................................................... 15 5.9 Temporary Excavations.................................................................................................. 16 5.10 Shoring........................................................................................................................... 17 5.11 Preliminary Pavement Design........................................................................................ 19 5.11.1 Asphalt Concrete Pavement.................................................................................... 19 5.11.2 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement..................................................................... 19 5.12 Exterior Flatwork........................................................................................................... 20 2
PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
5.12.1 Sidewalk, Pedestrian Walkways............................................................................. 20
5.13 Drainage......................................................................................................................... 21
5.14 Geotechnical Observation and Testing.......................................................................... 21
6.0 PROFESSIONAL LIMITATIONS........................................................................ 21 Attachments:
Figure 1 — Site Location Map
Figure 2 — Geotechnical Map
Appendix A -
References
Appendix B -
Exploration Boring Logs
Appendix C -
Laboratory Procedures and Test Results
Appendix D -
Seismic Settlement Assesment
Appendix E -
Hardscape Recommendations
Appendix F -
ASFE Insert
3 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of our limited geotechnical investigation was to evaluate near -surface soil conditions to provide preliminary feasibility level geotechnical design recommendations for a proposed multi -level apartment building complex. The scope of work undertaken included the following tasks:
• Compilation and interpretation of available, previously documented geologic and geotechnical data for the property;
• Coordination with Underground Service Alert to mark and identify buried utilities;
• Subsurface exploration, including the sampling and logging of two (2) hollow - stem auger borings to depths of 50 feet. Continuous logs of the subsurface conditions, as encountered in the borings, were recorded and are presented in Appendix B. The locations of the borings are shown in Figure 2 - Exploration Location Map;
• Laboratory testing and analysis of bulk and drive samples obtained in the field, including in -place moisture/densities, direct shear, consolidation, grain size distribution, expansion index, and soluble sulfates, to determine pertinent engineering properties. Laboratory descriptions and results are presented in Appendix C;
• Geotechnical engineering analysis and evaluation of collected data; and • Preparation of this report along with accompanying maps and illustrations. This report presents our findings, conclusions, and feasibility level recommendations.
1.2 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The subject site is located along the north side of Bristol Street, north of the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor, Highway 73, in Newport Beach, California. The subject site is identified as APN 427-342-01, and is addressed as 1300 Bristol Street N. The square -shaped subject site encompasses approximately 1.97-acres, and is currently occupied by an existing commercial office building along with paved drive and parking areas. The site is bordered by Bristol Street North to the south, Spruce Avenue to the west and existing commercial/retail buildings and paved parking to the north and east.
The approximate location of the site is illustrated in Figure 1 - Site Location Map.
Through discussions with the client and a review of conceptual yield study plans provided by TCA Architects, dated March 23, 2021, it is understood the proposed development preliminarily consists of a multi -level podium III style building entailing 0 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
multiple levels of studio, one -bedroom and two -bedroom apartments with both ground floor parking and two levels of subterranean parking. Access will be provided via a driveway that extends along the northern and eastern property boundaries.
Specific grading plans are not available; however, grading is anticipated to include cut excavations of at least 24-feet below existing grades to achieve the proposed grades for subterranean parking.
2.0 GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
2.1 Subsurface Investigation and Sampling
On April 5, 2021, two borings were advanced using a hollow -stem auger. The borings were excavated to a depth of 50 feet below the existing ground surface in the vicinity of the proposed development area. The borings were observed and logged by a geologist from KCG. Logs of the exploratory borings are included in Appendix B. The approximate location of the boreholes is illustrated in Figure 2 - Exploration Location Map.
During our field exploration, selected ring and bulk samples were obtained for laboratory testing. Bulk composite samples were collected from drilling excavation spoils. All samples collected were returned to our laboratory for evaluation and testing. Laboratory tests included in -situ moisture and density, direct shear, Atterberg limits, sieve and hydrometer, consolidation test, soluble sulfate and expansion index. Test descriptions and results are presented in the summary of laboratory testing within Appendix C.
2.2 Regional and Site Specific Geologic Setting
The subject site is located in the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province, at the south- eastern edge of the Los Angeles Basin and within the nearly flat -lying area of the Tustin Plain. The site is primarily underlain by elevated Pleistocene and late Pliocene marine terrace deposits established by progressive and (or) episodic tectonic uplift of coastal southern California.
The National Geologic Map Database maps the site as being underlain by late to middle Pleistocene Old Paralic Deposits. The Old Paralic Deposits comprise a poorly sorted, moderately permeable, reddish -brown, interfingered strandline, beach, estuarine, and colluvial deposits composed of silt, sand, and cobbles. These deposits rest on now emergent wave -cut abrasion platforms preserved by regional uplift. 61 / / � �� �- ■
. ._
-
/ � '_ « \
� - -- � � _ ,� _ � ■
-
,
' •; ■ • � �
9 w _
~ ^� it
. 44t N*
,
.. . .
j
'
• . � � �� ^� _,_ _ ._-
f
PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
2.3 Subsurface Conditions
2.3.1 Asphalt
The site is mantled by a relatively thin veneer of asphalt to a depth of approximately 4- inches from the existing ground in the vicinity of all of the boreholes.
2.3.2 Old Paralic Deposits (Qopfa)
The site is underlain by clay, clayey -silt and sand associated with the Old Paralic Deposits to an observed depth of up to 50 feet below the current ground level in the vicinity of the boreholes. The Old Paralic Deposits encountered during our subsurface exploration were generally light brown to dark gray, sandy clays and sandy to clayey silts, that were medium stiff to hard and moist to wet, with silty sands that were medium dense to very dense. Exploratory boring logs are presented in Appendix B.
2.4 Groundwater
A perched groundwater condition was encountered in boreholes KB-1 and KB-2 at depths of 26 feet and 35 feet, respectively. These perched zones are considered typical in this area where water accumulates in relatively permeable sand layers that are situated above or below relatively impermeable clay layers that act as confining layers and may not, in our opinion, necessarily represent the static groundwater level which may be closer to 50 feet below existing grades. However, these perched zones of groundwater will potentially impact the site construction and should be considered and incorporated into project design. We anticipate the perched groundwater may significantly impact two subterranean parking levels founded at a depth of 24 feet below existing grades. It should be noted that groundwater variation may result from fluctuations in the ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, rainfall, irrigation and other factors that may not be evident at the time of our subsurface exploration. Until the regional ground water table can be clearly established, the perched water discussed above should be considered in construction planning and final design.
The nearest groundwater observation well, monitored by the California Department of Water Resources, is located along Baker Street E, Costa Mesa, at a ground surface elevation of 42.290 feet above sea level. The highest recorded groundwater was recorded at 31.8 feet below the ground surface in October 1969 (Reference 4). The subject site is approximately 1.7 miles from this observation well. According to the California Geologic Survey (CGS), Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Tustin 7.5-Minute and Newport Beach 7.5 minute Quadrangle (References 6 and 7), the reported and mapped historical high groundwater level is approximately 10 feet to 30 feet below the current ground level in the vicinity of the site.
3 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
3.0 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS
3.1 Expansive Soil Characteristics
Expansion Index (EI) laboratory testing on representative soil samples from KB-1 and KB-2 resulted in indices of 62 and 61, respectively, which is considered "medium" expansion potential (EI 51-90) according to the CBC.
3.2 Sulfate Content
Sulfate testing was performed on a representative sample of the soil. The soils tested during this investigation indicated a class "S1" sulfate per ACI-318 (Reference 2), with a soluble sulfate content of 270 ppm or 0.027%.
3.3 Moisture and Density
Samples were retrieved at various depths below the ground surface from each boring location and used to determine in -place dry density and moisture content. Moisture results indicate the sampled soils have a moisture content of ranging from 6.2 to 23.3 percent and a dry density ranging from 102.9 to 117.2 pcf.
3.4 Faulting and Seismicity
The subject site is not located within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone (formerly known as Alquist-Priolo Zones, Jennings and Bryant, 2010; Hart and Bryant, 1997). The property is not located where a site -specific investigation to determine the locations of any active faults would be required. However, the Southern California region is seismically active. Active and potentially active faults within Southern California are capable of producing seismic shaking at the site. It is anticipated that the site will periodically experience ground acceleration due to exposure to moderate to large magnitude earthquakes occurring on distant faults.
The distances of the closest major active faults from the property were generated from information provided on the USGS online resource (USGS, 2008, National Seismic Hazards Maps, Source Parameters,), with the approximate center of the site being at latitude 33.6589°N and longitude 117.86855°W. The San Joaquin Hills Fault is located approximately 2.2 miles from the site, the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone approximately
4.9 miles from the site and the Newport Inglewood (Offshore segment) located approximately 5.4 miles from the site. However, no active faults are known to exist at the site, and the risk of surface fault rupture is considered to be low.
3.5 Seismic Design Parameters
Presented below are the site seismic parameters utilizing generic geologic, seismic, and geotechnical data gathered for the site using the SEAC/OSHPD web based tool (Reference 10). All structures should be designed for earthquake -induced strong ground motions in accordance with the 2019 CBC procedures utilizing the following parameters:
7 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
Seismic Design Parameters
Site Class Soil Profile
D
Latitude
33.6589334
Longitude
-117.8685508
Short Period Spectral Acceleration, Ss:
1.298
1-Second Period Spectral Acceleration,
0.463
S1:
Site Coefficient, Fa:
1.0 Site Coefficient, Fv:
1.8 Maximum Considered Earthquake
1.298
Spectral Response Acceleration, SMS:
Maximum Considered Earthquake
0.8334
Spectral Response Acceleration, SM1:
Design Spectral Response Acceleration,
0.865
SDS:
Design Spectral Response Acceleration,
0.555
SD1:
Site modified peak ground acceleration
0.612
PGAM
Seismic Design Category
D
Note: A site specific ground motion analysis was not included in the scope of this investigation. Per ASCE 7-16, 11.4.8, structures on Site Class D with S1 greater than or equal to 0.2 may require Site Specific Ground Motion Analysis. However, a site specific ground motion analysis may not be required based on exceptions listed in ASCE 7-16,
11.4.8. The project structural engineer should verify whether exceptions are valid for this site and if a Site Specific Ground Motion Analysis is required.
3.6 Seismic Hazards
3.6.1 Liquefaction Potential
Liquefaction occurs when ground water pressure in loose sandy soil becomes greater than overburden pressure due to seismic -induced cyclic shear stresses from earth quakes. The result is a near complete loss of soil shear strength and ground settlement. The California Geological Survey (CGS), Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Tustin Quadrangle (Reference 5) reports the site is not situated in a liquefaction zone. Our review of the Seismic Hazard Zone Reports for the Tustin and Newport Beach Quadrangles (References 6 & 7), indicate the historic groundwater is reported to be approximately 10 feet to 30 feet from existing grades in the vicinity of the property. Our liquefaction analysis conservatively incorporates the historic high groundwater depth of 10 feet. Our geotechnical evaluation indicated that localized and isolated sandy layers within the Old Paralic Deposits that underlie the site are susceptible to relatively minor amounts of liquefaction due to a design -level earthquake along a nearby fault and incorporating the historical high groundwater level of 10 feet below existing grades. Overall seismic E
PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
induced liquefaction settlement would be reduced with the removal of materials for the subterranean excavations. The portions of the site that appear to be susceptible to liquefaction and the magnitudes of seismic -induced settlement described above appear to be somewhat localized. The state of California has not established a seismic hazard zone for the area.
3.6.2 Liquefaction Settlement Analysis
The total earthquake -induced liquefaction settlement potential was calculated using CivilTech Software's Liquefy Pro computer program. Our evaluation was based on the site class and adjusted peak ground acceleration of 0.612g, as presented in the Seismic Design Parameters Table above, and a probabilistic 2,475-year modal magnitude of 6.89.
Our analysis indicated the estimated settlement due to earthquake -induced liquefaction settlement is approximately 0.36 inches to 0.54 inches. These settlement values are considered preliminary, and further geotechnical investigations would be required to provide refinement of the estimated differential settlement of the site. The results of our analysis are included herein in Appendix D - Seismic Settlement Analysis.
3.6.3 Lateral Spreading
Lateral spreading, a phenomenon associated with seismically induced soil liquefaction, is the lateral displacement of soils due to inertial motion and lack of lateral support during or post liquefaction. Lateral spreading generally occurs on gently sloping ground or level ground with nearby free surface faces such as a drainage or stream channel. The San Diego Creek is located approximately 2,180 ft to the southeast of the proposed development and consists of an approximately loft high free face. According to studies undertaken by Zhang et al. (2004), Cubrinovski (2012), lateral displacements occur between 300 and 1000 feet from a "free face". As such, lateral spreading would likely be nil within the project site.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions are preliminary and based upon our analysis and data review obtained during our limited subsurface field investigation and laboratory testing. It is our opinion that the proposed development concept is considered geotechnically feasible provided the recommendations presented herein are implemented during design and construction.
• Based upon our review of the site and the proposed development plans, the underlying soils on -site are considered to have sufficient bearing capacity to support the proposed development, provided the recommendations herein are implemented. • Based on our laboratory testing, soils underlying the site have a moderate expansion potential. However, the underlying soils are variable and anticipated to possess a very low to high expansion potential.
• Our geotechnical evaluation indicates that sandy layers within the Paralic Deposits that E
PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
underlie the site are susceptible to liquefaction due to a design -level earthquake incorporating a historical high groundwater level of 10 feet below existing grades (CGS/CDMG, 1998). The estimated settlements are in the range of 0.37 inches to 0.58 inches and appear to be limited to isolated and localized relatively thin zones between 25 and 40 feet below existing grades at the site during seismic events. Overall seismic induced liquefaction settlement would be reduced with the removal of the upper materials for the subterranean excavations, as summarized in Section 2.6. The liquefaction assessment is considered preliminary, and further study is required to refine the estimates and determine likely differential settlement. Lateral spreading is deemed unlikely due to the lack of "free face" in the vicinity of the subject site. • No active fault is known to exist at the site, and the risk of surface fault rupture is considered to be low. However, the project site lies within a region of historical seismicity and will likely be subject to seismic shaking in the future. • KCG's professional opinion is that liquefaction -induced ground displacements are relatively minor overall and can be mitigated through the use of a reinforced concrete structural mat foundation system for the support of the proposed apartment building and parking structure.
• Soils underlying the subject site are not considered to be susceptible to hydrocollapse; • A perched groundwater condition was encountered in our exploratory borings at depths of 26 and 35 feet below the existing ground surface. Although these perched zones are considered typical in the site vicinity where water accumulates in relatively permeable sand layers situated above and/or below confining layers, it may not, in our opinion, represent the static groundwater level which is more likely close to 50 feet below existing grades. However, this perched zone of groundwater will potentially impact and pose a problem for the site construction for two subterranean levels at or near a depth of 24 feet below existing grades. Temporary dewatering or other measures should be considered and groundwater levels incorporated into the project design for the proposed development;
• Based on laboratory soil test results, the on -site soils indicated a soluble sulfate content considered "Class S 1 ", moderate severity per the 2014 ACI Concrete Manual of Practice. • The proposed development should not adversely affect neighboring properties.
5.0 PRELIMINARY RECOMMENDATIONS
Preliminary recommendations presented below are based on plans obtained from the client and the limited geotechnical information gathered and analyzed to date. To provide uniform soil support for the proposed structures, we recommend that the upper soils be 10 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
removed and re -compacted in those areas to receive buildings or other settlement - sensitive improvements, where not removed by planned excavation. The depth of removals will be dependent upon the type of foundation system selected.
5.1 Supplemental Subsurface Exploration
During this limited investigation, the subsurface exploration was limited to two boring locations in readily accessible areas. We recommend that a supplemental geotechnical investigation be performed that includes additional borings (including installation of piezometers) and CPT soundings (with ground water measuring capabilities). The supplemental investigation should also include additional laboratory testing, foundation and settlement analysis; ground water measurements and to verify subsurface conditions.
Recommendations would be updated as warranted.
5.2 Earthwork Specifications
All grading should be performed per the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications presented in Appendix F unless specifically revised or amended below. Grading should also conform to all applicable governing agency requirements. Prior to the commencement of grading operations, all vegetation, organic topsoil and human -made structure should be cleared and disposed of off -site. Any undocumented fill or back -fill encountered should be removed and re -compacted. All areas receiving fill should be scarified to 6 inches and/or over -excavated, moisture conditioned to between optimum moisture and two to four percent above optimum moisture content, and re -compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM D1557. Soil material excavated from the site should be adequate for re -use as compacted fill provided it is free of trash, vegetation and other deleterious material. All earthwork and grading operation should be performed under the observation and testing of the geotechnical consultant of record.
5.3 Remedial Earthwork
5.3.1 Foundation Design Option: Conventional Foundations -Two Levels Subterranean
We recommend the subterranean level pad area be over excavated a minimum of five feet below the subterranean level finish grade elevation, or a minimum of two feet below proposed foundations, whichever is deeper. This would account for soil variability, expansion potential, reduce the potential for settlement and differential settlement and maintain a uniform fill blanket beneath the bottom of the foundations. The over -excavation should be extended a minimum of five feet laterally beyond the proposed building footprint and/or foundations or equal to the depth of the over -excavation, which -ever is deeper, where practical. Footings should be underlain by a minimum of two -feet of engineered fill below the bottom of footings.
11 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
5.3.2 Foundation Design Option: Mat Slab Foundations -Two Levels Subterranean
For Mat slab foundation systems, the removals can be reduced to reprocessing (i.e. 12-inch scarification and recompaction) and proof rolling of the subgrade soils exposed at the subterranean level.
5.3.3 Proposed Pavement and Flatwork Areas
In areas outside of proposed structural areas that would support pavement and flatwork, the exposed sub -grade soils should be processed and re -compacted to a depth of 12-inches. If soils are disturbed during the removal of existing improvements, the disturbed soil should be removed and replaced with compacted fill. After removals are made, exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of 6- inches, brought to near optimum moisture content, and re -compacted.
5.4 Processing of Natural Soils and Fill Placement
Processing of in -place soils exposed after clearing, grubbing, and removal of unsuitable material and before placing fill should include the following items of work:
Scarification of the materials exposed after remedial removals should be accomplished to a depth of at least 6 inches or as dictated by actual soil conditions encountered; The scarified soils should be brought to 2 to 4 percent above optimum moisture content by watering or drying, as required;
Compaction of the processed soils to at least 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density before placing fill.
Fill should be placed in relatively thin (6 to 8-inch) uniform lifts; moisture conditioned to 2 to 4 percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction based on ASTM D 1557. Actual lift thickness would depend on soil type and compaction equipment being used.
5.5 Proposed Building Foundations
All foundation criteria are considered minimum requirements that may be superseded by more stringent requirements from the architect, structural engineer, or governing agencies; recommended geotechnical design parameters are being provided for conventional spread footing and reinforced mat slab foundation systems for the 12 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
residential building; and drilled auger -cast pile for the parking structure at grade, and mat slab for the proposed parking structure with subterranean levels.
5.5.1 Subterranean -Conventional Shallow Foundations
The following geotechnical design parameters are provided to design proposed conventional foundations for the proposed multi -level apartment building, with two levels of subterranean parking. The proposed foundations for the proposed building may be supported by square pad footings utilizing a maximum allowable bearing pressure of 3000 pounds per square foot. The maximum width of the continuous footings should be no more than 8-feet with a minimum depth of 3- feet below the lowest adjacent grade (which included the top of the slab on grade). A coefficient of friction of 0.40 may be used, along with a passive lateral resistance of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of embedment. Sub -grade soil would likely require recompaction or processing for up to three feet.
If normal code requirements are used for seismic design, the allowable bearing value and coefficient of friction may be increased by 1/3 for short duration loads, such as the effect of wind or seismic forces.
If any utility lines are within a 1:1 (horizontal: vertical) projection from the bottom of a footing, they may be within the influence zone of the proposed footing load; if this condition exists, the proposed footing should be deepened so that the utility is outside the zone of influence; the utility line could also be relocated or encased with concrete with concrete slurry. These conditions should be evaluated on a case by case basis.
5.5.2 Subterranean- Mat Slab
A rigid mat foundation may be used to support the buildings at the site, provided the mat foundation is bearing within soils that are properly compacted, and proof rolled in accordance with the recommendations contained herein. When properly designed and constructed, a structural mat foundation system can be expected to support high structural loads and provide relatively uniform settlement across a structure while being able to "bridge" over local areas of dynamic and anticipated static settlement. Mat foundations should be properly reinforced to form a relatively rigid structural unit in accordance with the structural engineer's design.
For designing a mat foundation, we recommend using a modulus of subgrade reaction of 65 pounds per square inch per inch (pci). This value can be further refined as part of the supplemental investigation.
13 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
5.6 Settlement
Static settlement of proposed foundations is not expected to exceed one inch for total and one half inch differential over 50 horizontal feet, provided the minimum remedial earthwork recommendations provided in Section 5.2 is performed for the specific foundation system type. For preliminary design purposes, seismic induced liquefaction settlement for the apartment site is 0.37 to 0.58 inches. Overall seismic induced liquefaction settlement would be reduced with the removal of static settlements can be additive. It may be prudent to assume a lesser horizontal distance should adjacent footings be substantially different in size. Further study is required to refine and calculate likely differential settlement beneath the proposed development.
5.7 Slab -On -Grade
These recommendations are considered minimum requirements for residential applications that may be superseded by more stringent requirements from the architect, structural engineer, or governing agencies.
Concrete slabs should be at least 5-inches in thickness. Actual slab thickness and reinforcement should be determined by the structural engineer based on structural loads and soil interaction. Our recommendations should be superseded by the recommendations of the structural engineer or architect.
Subgrade soils should be placed wet of the optimum moisture content, and moisture should be maintained until placement of the concrete slab. Additional testing should be performed after precise grading to verify our recommendations.
The slab should be underlain by a minimum two-inch layer of sand, with a sand equivalent of 30 or greater. The sand layer should be underlain by a 15-mil Stego Wrap vapor retarder or equivalent product with a permeance rate of 0.012 perms and a puncture resistance of Class "A" or "B" per ASTM E 1745-97. As per the manufacturer's recommendations, all seams should overlap a minimum of 6 inches and should be sealed in accordance with the specifications provided by the vapor retarder manufacturer. All penetrations should be sealed using a combination of Stego Wrap, Stego Tape and/or Stego Mastic or approved equivalent product. The vapor retarder should be lapped downward a minimum of 12 inches where the vapor retarder encounters an interior footing or exterior thickened edge or footing. The vapor retarder should be placed on top of the sand layer if the sand is expected to become wet before pouring concrete. If the sand can be kept dry before pouring concrete, the vapor retarder should be placed under the sand layer. The water -cement ratio should be a minimum of 0.45 for all concrete within the structure that will contact the on -site soil.
If moisture sensitive floor coverings are utilized, interior concrete slabs should be designed and constructed in accordance with the applicable floor covering manufacturer's specifications.
14 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
Slab subgrade soil should be pre -saturated to at least optimum moisture content to a depth of at least 12 inches below the sand layer.
5.7.1 Basement Slab on Grade Floors
Parking garage basement slab in grade floors, other than a mat slab, should be a minimum of 5-inches in thickness and reinforced to resist shrinkage and temperature warping cracking. Actual slab thickness and steel reinforcement should be determined by the structural engineer based on environmental factors and concrete shrinkage considerations. An aggregate base layer may be required depending on the subgrade soils exposed during construction or determined from the supplemental investigation.
5.8 Permanent Subterranean Walls
We anticipate that where temporary shoring is installed, the permanent restrained retaining walls for the subterranean level will predominantly be placed directly against the temporary shoring. The design parameters provided below assume that granular non - expansive soils (Expansion Index 30) are used to back -fill any retaining walls. Permanent subterranean walls should be designed to resist the pressure exerted by retained soils plus any additional lateral forces due to loads placed adjacent to or near the wall. Retaining walls that are free -draining, are situated above groundwater and are to be restrained from movement at the top, such as basement walls, should be designed for an equivalent fluid weight of 60 pcf for at -rest conditions (for a level surface of retained earth). If traffic loads are planned adjacent to the walls, the walls should be designed for an additional uniform horizontal pressure of 75 and 150 psf for passenger car and truck traffic, respectively. For other surcharge loads, we recommend the walls be designed to resist a uniform horizontal pressure equal to 30 percent of the uniform surcharge load.
If back -fill conditions (including the slope of the retained ground surface) differ from those assumed herein, Kling Consulting Group should be consulted to provide additional evaluation and/or recommendations as warranted. All retaining structures should be fully free draining. Building walls below grade should be waterproofed or damp -proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. The foundation system for the retaining walls should be designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the preceding sections of this report, as appropriate. Footings should be embedded at a minimum of 18-inches below adjacent grade (excluding the 6-inch landscape layer).
For resistance to lateral loads, an allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 between the base of the foundation elements and underlying material is recommended. In addition, an allowable passive resistance equal to an equivalent fluid weighing 300 pcf acting against the foundation may be used to resist lateral forces. Passive pressure in the upper 1.0-foot should be neglected unless confined by concrete slabs -on -grade or asphaltic pavement.
These values may be increased by one-third for transient wind or seismic loads. A seismic surcharge of 19 H should be applied as an equivalent fluid pressure with the 15 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
resultant acting at 1/3-height above the base of the wall, where H= the retained height of the wall greater than 6 feet.
The permanent subterranean wall should be provided with an adequate back drain system to reduce the potential for build-up of hydrostatic pressures.
Adequate drainage should be provided behind all retaining walls. The drainage system should consist of a minimum of four -inch diameter perforated PVC pipe (schedule 40 or approved equivalent) placed at the base of the retaining wall and surrounded by 3/4-inch clean crushed rock wrapped in a Mirafi 140N filter fabric, or equivalent approved by the Geotechnical Engineer. The drain rock wrapped in fabric should be at least 12-inches wide and extend from the base of the wall to within two feet of the ground surface. The upper two feet of back -fill should consist of compacted native soil. The retaining wall drainage system should be sloped to outfall to the storm drain system or other appropriate facility.
For those portions of the wall not placed against shoring, the above values assume granular back -fill and free -draining conditions to prevent buildup of hydrostatic pressure in the back -fill. Back -fill materials should meet the recommendations described in the following section of this report. Import fill materials should be approved by the soils engineer prior to placement. Wall back -fill should be compacted by mechanical methods to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557.
5.9 Temporary Excavations
We anticipate the on -site soils can be excavated using conventional heavy duty earthmoving equipment in good condition. Shoring systems, if used, may yield during excavation causing adjacent facilities and improvements to settle slightly. The magnitude of shoring movements and the resulting settlements are difficult to estimate because they depend on many factors, including the method of installation and the contractor's skill with installing the shoring system. Lateral deflections for a properly designed and constructed shoring system would likely be within ordinarily accepted limits of approximately 1-inch. A monitoring program should be established to evaluate the effects of shoring construction on other facilities.
Provided the excavations are above groundwater, temporary excavations and trench walls to a depth of four feet may be made vertically without shoring, subject to verification of safety by the contractor. Deeper excavations should be no steeper than 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical) or braced or shored in accordance with CAL OSHA standards and guidelines.
The contractor is assumed responsible for maintaining safety at the jobsite. All excavation work should be in compliance with current CAL OSHA standards. Under no circumstances should excavations be made deeper than four feet or below groundwater without shoring, bracing or laying -back, in accordance with CAL OSHA standards and guidelines. No surcharge loads should be allowed within five feet from the top of the cuts.
16 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
Existing utility lines, roadways and other easements/right-of-ways may be impacted by the temporary excavations may require shoring to obtain the full depth of the excavation.
5.10 Shoring
It is understood that a temporary or permanent shoring system may be warranted for those areas of proposed excavation for the proposed structures to achieve the subterranean level grades where space is not available for properly sloped backcuts. The shoring contractor should coordinate with the earthmoving contractor regarding sequence and requirements of installing the shoring system. The shoring contractor should also consider the potential for localized perched groundwater in the design and installation procedures of the shoring system.
We anticipate that the shoring system will be designed as a cantilever system and may consist of closely spaced steel H-Pile soldier piles and wooden lagging. Preliminary design considerations are presented in the following section for this anticipated shoring method. Please note that the method of temporary support can impact the design earth pressures. As such, Kling Consulting Group should perform a review of the shoring design and provide additional recommendations, as warranted.
Shoring systems, during excavation, may yield causing adjacent facilities and improvements to settle slightly. The magnitude of shoring movements and the resulting settlements are difficult to estimate because they depend on many factors, including the method of installation and the contractor's skill with installing the shoring system.
Lateral deflections for a properly designed and constructed shoring system would likely be within ordinarily accepted limits of approximately 1-inch. A monitoring program should be established to evaluate the effects of shoring construction on other facilities.
Horizontal and vertical movements of the shoring system should be monitored by a licensed surveyor. The construction monitoring and performance of the shoring system are ultimately the contractor's responsibility. At a minimum, we recommend that the tops of the soldier beams should be surveyed prior to excavation and that the top and bottom of the soldier beams be surveyed on a weekly basis until the foundation is completed. The surveyed soldier beam data points should be located at approximately 50 feet on -center.
Surveying should consist of measuring movements in vertical and two perpendicular horizontal directions.
The shoring system should be designed to resist the pressure exerted by the retained soils plus any additional lateral forces due to loads applied near the top of the excavations.
Cantilever shoring walls with a level back -fill surface should be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 40 pcf. For surcharge loads due to traffic, the shoring should be designed for an additional uniform horizontal pressure of 75 psf for passenger car traffic and 150 psf for heavy truck traffic. For other surcharge loads, the wall should be designed for a uniform horizontal pressure equal to one-third the anticipated surcharge pressure. These parameters all assume a level ground surface and that temporary shoring 17 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
will not be subject to hydrostatic pressures. The shoring system should be properly embedded beneath the toe of the excavation to provide adequate structural stability.
It is recommended that the design of the shoring system incorporate a passive equivalent fluid weight of 300 pcf for the shoring embedded within relatively competent old paralic deposits material. The soldier piles should be spaced no closer than 3 diameters on center.
The soldier piles should be drilled and back -filled with concrete to the full depth of the passive resistance zone. The area providing the passive resistance can be assumed to have a width equal to twice the concrete pile diameter.
The recommended passive pressure for the shoring assumes a horizontal surface for the soil mass extending at least 10 feet in front of the face of the shoring, or three times the height of the surface generating passive pressure, whichever is greater. The shoring system should be embedded a sufficient depth beneath the toe of the excavation so as to provide structural stability. We recommend that a factor of safety of at least 1.2 be applied to the calculated embedment depth and that the passive pressure be limited to 2,500 ps£ The assumed geotechnical conditions should be verified as necessary during shoring construction by a representative of the geotechnical consultant.
Timber lagging may be used between the soldier piles to help support the exposed soils.
If lagging is to remain after construction, treated lumber should be used. Lagging should be designed for the full lateral pressure recommended above. If possible, structural walls should be cast directly against the shoring, thus eliminating the need for placing back -fill within a narrow space. Voids between the soil and lagging should be properly grouted or slurried to reduce the potential for the voids to propagate to the surface.
Special provisions for wall drainage (such as the use of prefabricated composite drain) may be necessary above the groundwater table where this type of construction is used.
The performance of the proposed shoring system is highly dependent on the means and methods utilized by the contractors involved in the work and the judgment of the shoring design engineer. The shoring engineer and contractor shall be solely responsible for locating the existing improvements surrounding the site, controlling settlements of the surrounding structures and improvements within the structural and aesthetic limits. Load path and loading determination for underpinning design is the purview of the structural underpinning designer.
If the anticipated depth of excavation requires shoring that extends to depths where a cantilever shoring system is not feasible, we would be pleased to provide geotechnical recommendations for an anchored (tie -back) shoring system upon request. With deep excavations required to allow for the construction of subterranean levels that would normally require tie -back anchors, due to the proximity to the adjacent properties or structures tie -back systems may not be allowed and other options such as H-beam and lagging or rakers may be required.
PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
5.11 Preliminary Pavement Design
Pavement section design is provided below based on near surface soil conditions encountered during our investigation and assumed traffic loading.
5.11.1 Asphalt Concrete Pavement
The upper on -site subgrade soils were classified as sandy clays and clayey silts and sandy silts. To allow for soil variability, we are assuming an R-Value of 10 for preliminary design purposes.
Based on an R-value of 10, the parameters below are provided for preliminary design purposes. Pavement sections were calculated for traffic indices of 4.0 and
5.5, which are commonly used for parking stalls and drive aisles subject to passenger vehicles, respectively. However, the selection of actual traffic index should be the purview of the project civil or traffic engineer.
Pavement Section Design
Multi
le Layered
Asphalt
Aggregate
Location
R-Value
Traffic
Index
Concrete
Base*
(inches)
(inches)
Parking
10 4.0
3.0 6.0
Stall
Drive
10 5.5
4.0 9.0
Aisles
*Aggregate base material should consist of Class 2 aggregate base materials or Crushed Miscellaneous Base (CMB).
The upper 12 inches of the subgrade soils should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557). All base materials should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the laboratory maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557).
5.11.2 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement
For preliminary design of concrete pavement, it is recommended that a concrete pavement section consisting of 6-inches of concrete underlain by at least 4-inches of either Class 2 or crushed miscellaneous base be used for preliminary design.
Concrete Compressive strength should be 4000 psi or greater. Aggregate base material should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction as per ASTM D1557. Subgrade soil should be compacted to at least 90 percent of 19 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
the laboratory maximum dry density in accordance with ASTM D1557. If concrete crack control is desired, the slabs should be minimally reinforced with No. 4 rebar, placed every 24 inches on center, both ways. A 10-foot square or less grid system should be used in the construction of continuous sections of concrete pavement or as recommended by the structural engineer.
For trash enclosures, concrete pavement should consist of a minimum 8-inch thick concrete slab placed over a minimum of 6-inches of either Class 2 or crushed miscellaneous base material, compacted to 95 percent relative compaction.
Concrete should have a minimum strength of 4000 psi and be reinforced with a minimum of No. 4 bars placed at 24 inches on center, in each direction, positively supported (with concrete chairs or other devices) at mid -height in the slab. Crack control joints should be placed at a 10-foot maximum spacing in each direction in the slab or as recommended by the structural engineer. Concrete mix design should incorporate the recommendations presented in the slab on grade section of this report for improved geotechnical performance.
5.12 Exterior Flatwork
Laboratory testing of onsite soils by and our experience with similar soils in the site vicinity indicate that the upper on -site soil materials present possess a very low to high expansion potential. Appendix E contains a table listing our hardscape recommendations for varying degrees of expansive soils. This table should be preliminarily followed for a low to high expansion potential for Expansion Index (E.I.) _ 21 to 130. Additional testing should be performed during future supplemental investigation and subsequently during earthwork construction to confirm the as graded conditions.
The following general recommendations may be considered for concrete hardscape including expansive soils mitigation and may be superseded by the requirements of the City of Newport Beach. These recommendations are based on "medium" expansion potential and are preliminary.
5.12.1 Sidewalk, Pedestrian Walkways
Expansion
Minimum
Subgrade
Joint *
Potential
Concrete
Pre -Soaking Depth
Reinforcement
Spacing
Thickness (in)
Medium
120% of Optimum to
#3 @ 16" OC, EW
(EI >51 &
4 (Full)
18"
4-5 Feet
<90)
(or 5% over optimum,
* Joints at curves and angle points are recommended.
20 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group PN 21016-00
April 19, 2021
The above recommendations may be superseded by the project architect, structural engineer or the governing agency's requirements. These recommendations are not intended to mitigate cracking caused by shrinkage and temperature warping.
5.13 Drainage
Positive drainage should be maintained away from any building or graded slope face and directed to suitable areas via non -erosive devices, as designed by the project civil engineer. For drainage over soil and paved areas immediately adjacent to structures, please refer to Section 1804.4 of the 2019 CBC.
5.14 Geotechnical Observation and Testing
Geotechnical observation and testing should be conducted during the following stages of grading:
• During all phases of precise grading, footing excavations, etc. • During slab subgrade pre -saturation and moisture conditioning. • During utility trench excavation and compaction.
• During placement of retaining wall sub -drainage, back -fill, and compaction. • For any unusual conditions encountered during grading.
6.0 PROFESSIONAL LIMITATIONS
Geotechnical services are provided by KCG in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering and geologic practice in the area where these services are to be rendered. Client acknowledges that the present standard in the engineering and geologic and environmental profession does not include a guarantee of perfection and, except as expressly set forth in the conditions above, no warranty, expressed or implied, is extended by KCG.
Geotechnical reports are based on the project description and proposed scope of work as described in the proposal. Our conclusions and recommendations are based on the results of the field, laboratory, and office studies, combined with an interpolation and extrapolation of soil conditions as described in the report. The results reflect our geotechnical interpretation of the limited direct evidence obtained. Our conclusions and recommendations are made contingent upon the opportunity for KCG to continue to provide geotechnical services beyond the scope in the proposal to include all geotechnical services. If parties other than KCG are engaged to provide such services, they must be notified that they will be required to assume complete responsibility for the geotechnical 21 PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
work of the project by concurring with the recommendations in our report or providing alternate recommendations.
It is the reader's responsibility to verify the correct interpretation and intention of the recommendations presented herein. KCG assumes no responsibility for misunderstandings or improper interpretations that result in unsatisfactory or unsafe work products. It is the reader's further responsibility to acquire copies of any supplemental reports, addenda, or responses to public agency reviews that may supersede recommendations in this report.
22 PA2021-161
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2018, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 04.08, Construction: Soil and Rock (I), Standards D 420 - D 5876
2. American Concrete Institute, 2014, Manual of Concrete Practice, Volume 1 through 6.
3. California Building Standards Commission, 2019, California Building Code, Volume 2.
4. California Department of Water Resources, 2019, Groundwater Level Data, accessed mAR 2021 URL: http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrgM/ .
5. California Geologic Survey (CGS), Compilation of Quaternary Surficial Deposits:
https://maps.conservation . ca. gov/cgs/gsd/gpp/, Accessed mAR 2021.
6. California Geological Survey, 1998, Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Tustin Quadrangle, dated 1998.
7. California Geological Survey, 1998, Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation, Newport Quadrangle, dated 1998.
8. California Geological Survey, Department of Conservation, Division of Mines of Geology, 1997, "Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Los Angeles 7.5-Minute Quadrangle", Seismic Hazard Zone Report 029, Los Angeles, CA.
9. Cubrinovski, M. Robinson, K. Taylor, M. Hughes, M. Orense, R. (2012) Lateral spreading and its impacts in urban areas in the 2010-2011 Christchurch earthquakes, New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 55:3, 255-269, DOI:
10.1080/00288306.2012.699895
10. Youd, T. L., Hansen, C. M., and Bartlett, S. F.—2002!. Revised multilinear regression equations for prediction of lateral spread displacement. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 1007-1017
11. Google Maps. Los Angeles. 34.0581867,-118.1454599, Accessed Mar 2021
12. Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAL)/Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development OSHPD: Seismic Design Maps: https:Hoshpd.ca.gov/seismic maps.org, accessed Mar, 2020.
13. USGS, National Geologic Map Data Base (NGMDB), https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/mqpvie accessed Mar, 2021.
14. USGS, topoView, httl2s://n mg db.usgs.gov/topoview/, accessed Mar, 2021.
HASWebbTrojects\20138-00 Lee\Report
PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 19, 2021
PN 21016-00
15. USGS, 2019, US Seismic Design Maps, accessed Mar, 2021., URL:
https://earthquake.usgs ovg /desi ig lmaps/us/application.php
16. Zhang, G. Robertson, P.K. 2004. Estimating Liquefaction -Induced Lateral Displacements Using the Standard Penetration Test or Cone Penetration Test. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.
HASWebbTrojects\20138-00 Lee\Report
PA2021-161
APPENDIX B
EXPLORATION BORING LOGS
PA2021-161
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING Sheet 1 of 3
Project: The Picerne Group Boring No.: KB-1
Project Number: 21016-00 Driller: Cal-Pac
Date Drilled: 4/5/21 Drill Type: Hollow -Stem Auger
Logged By: S.W Hammer Wt. / Drop: 18in
Ground Elev. [ft]: ---
CM
a)
Standard ■ Shelby Q Water Level
Standard
o
o
w
Split Spoon Tube ATD
n
0 o
�'
o }
p Q
Bulk 1 Static Water
California
Y w
)
Remarks
2 E
m
g o
Sample Table
o
(�
Un
U
p
a
SOIL DESCRIPTION and CLASSIFICATION (USCS)
Surficial Ash halt Layer
Old Paralic Deposits (QoP)
@ 0.3 feet - Sandy CLAY (CL): light brown, very stiff, dry. @ 2.0 feet - Sandy SILT (ML): light brown, very stiff, dry. 7 6.2
116.7
13 13
5 7
15.7 105.
@ 5.0 feet - Clayey SILT (ML): dark grayish brown, very stiff, 12 moist.
13 10
8 16.3
117.2
19 33
15 7
@ 15.0 feet - Clayey SILT (ML): dark gray, very stiff, moist. 9 17
20 3
8 13
KLI N
KCIGIConsulting
Group, Inc.
PA2021-161
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING Sheet 2 of 3
Project: The Picerne Group Boring No.: KB-1
Project Number: 21016-00 Driller: Cal-Pac
Date Drilled: 4/5/21 Drill Type: Hollow -Stem Auger
Logged By: SM Hammer Wt. / Drop: 18in
Ground Elev. [ft]: ---
Standard ■ Shelby Q Water Level
o
T
o o
Split Spoon Tube ATD
n
°'
a
377
o
o
Bulk 1 Static Water
California
CL
Y w
Remarks
E
m
20 Sample Table
o
(�
�
U
p
a
SOIL DESCRIPTION and CLASSIFICATION (USCS)
10 24
26 @ 26.0 feet - Silty Sand (SM): fine grained, light brownish orange, very dense, wet.
30 2
13 21
@ 31.0 feet - Sand (SM): medium -coarse grained, light gray, dense, wet, shell fragments.
35 4
15 25
40 1
@ 40.0 feet - CLAY (CH): dark gray, firm, wet.
2 3
45 1
3 3
KCGKLI N
ComUlting
Group, Inc.
PA2021-161
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING Sheet 3 of 3
Project: The Picerne Group Boring No.: KB-1
Project Number: 21016-00 Driller: Cal-Pac
Date Drilled: 4/5/21 Drill Type: Hollow -Stem Auger
Logged By: S.W Hammer Wt. / Drop: 18in
Ground Elev. [ft]: ---
Standard ■ Shelby Q Water Level
0 o
N
Slit Soon
ppTube ATD
L
n
3 o
U'
o
p0 Q
Bulk 1 Static Water
California
CL
Y .Z.
J
Remarks
E
m
g o
L
Sample Table
o
(�
U)
U
p
a
SOIL DESCRIPTION and CLASSIFICATION (USCS)
2 Total Depth: 50 feet.
2 Groundwater encountered at 26ft.
3 No caving.
KCGIDLING
IConsulting
Group, Inc.
PA2021-161
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING Sheet 1 of 3
Project: The Picerne Group Boring No.: KB-2
Project Number: 21016-00 Driller: Cal-Pac
Date Drilled: 4/5/21 Drill Type: Hollow -Stem Auger
Logged By: S.W Hammer Wt. / Drop: 18in
Ground Elev. [ft]: ---
CM
a)
Standard ■ Shelby Q Water Level
Standard
o
o
w
Split Spoon Tube ATD
n
3 o
�'
o }
p Q
Bulk 1 Static Water
California
Y w
)
Remarks
2 E
m
g o
Sample Table
o
(�
U)
U
p
a
SOIL DESCRIPTION and CLASSIFICATION (USCS)
Surficial Ash halt Layer
Old Paralic Deposits (QoP)
@ 0.4 feet - Clayey SILT (ML): dark grayish brown, very stiff, moist.
5 12.6
115.9
8 7
5 3
23.3 102.9
@ 5.0 feet - Sandy SILT (ML): light brown, very stiff, dry. 6 11
10 6
20.9 107.7
10 16
15 3
@ 15.0 feet - SILT (ML): dark grayish brown, some clay, 6 stiff, moist.
7 20
3 @ 20.0 feet - Clayey SILT (ML): dark gray, stiff, moist. 6 6
KLI N
KCIGIConsulting
Group, Inc.
PA2021-161
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING Sheet 2 of 3
Project: The Picerne Group Boring No.: KB-2
Project Number: 21016-00 Driller: Cal-Pac
Date Drilled: 4/5/21 Drill Type: Hollow -Stem Auger
Logged By: S.W Hammer Wt. / Drop: 18in
Ground Elev. [ft]: ---
Standard ■ Shelby Q Water Level
o
J
T
o o
w
Split Spoon Tube ATD
L
n
5 0
o
+3+ ""
�'
o }
C �'
p Q
Bulk 1 Static Water
California
d
Y w
N
Remarks
2 E
m
g o
Sample Table
o
(�
U)
U
p
a
SOIL DESCRIPTION and CLASSIFICATION (USCS)
3 7
9 30
2 4
5 35
4 @ 35.0 feet - Sand (SM): fine grained, light brownish orange, 6 medium dense, wet.
9 40
10 7
7 @ 41.0 feet - CLAY (CH): dark gray, firm, wet.
45 2
2 4
KCGKLI N
ComUlting
Group, Inc.
PA2021-161
LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING Sheet 3 of 3
Project: The Picerne Group Boring No.: KB-2
Project Number: 21016-00 Driller: Cal-Pac
Date Drilled: 4/5/21 Drill Type: Hollow -Stem Auger
Logged By: S.W Hammer Wt. / Drop: 18in
Ground Elev. [ft]: ---
Standard ■ Shelby Q Water Level
0 o
N
Slit Soon
ppTube ATD
L
n
3 o
U'
o
p0 Q
Bulk 1 Static Water
California
CL
Y .Z.
J
Remarks
E
m
g o
L
Sample Table
o
(�
U)
U
p
a
SOIL DESCRIPTION and CLASSIFICATION (USCS)
2 Total Depth: 50 feet.
3 Groundwater encountered at 35ft.
3 No caving.
KCGIDLING
IConsulting
Group, Inc.
PA2021-161
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURES AND RESULTS
PA2021-161
The Picerne Group
April 12, 2021
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY TEST PROCEDURES
VISUAL CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS
PN 21016-00
As a part of the routine laboratory soil testing, the soil samples are visually classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System by experienced laboratory technicians. If necessary, in order to verify the visual classification, selected samples are classified utilizing the results of Standard Classification tests performed in accordance with ASTM D2487-00.
MOISTURE CONTENT AND DRY DENSITY DETERMINATION
Moisture content and dry density determinations were performed on relatively undisturbed samples obtained during our field exploration. The field moisture content is obtained by methods described in ASTM D2216-05. The in -situ dry unit weight was computed using the net weight and volume of the relatively undisturbed samples. The results of these tests are presented on the borings logs in Appendix B.
DIRECT SHEAR TESTS
Direct shear tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D3080-98 on selected remolded and relatively undisturbed samples that were pre-soaked for a minimum of 24 hours. The samples were then tested under various normal loads with a different specimen being used for each normal load. The samples were sheared in a motor driven, strain -controlled direct shear testing apparatus at a strain rate of 0.05 inches per minute. The results of this test are presented in the Laboratory Summary.
EXPANSION INDEX TEST
The expansion potential of selected materials was evaluated by the Expansion Index Test, U.B.C. Standard No. 18-2. The specimen was molded under a given compactive energy and moisture content to achieve approximately 50 percent saturation. The prepared f- inch thick by 4-inch diameter specimen was then loaded with a 144 psf surcharge and inundated with water until volumetric equilibrium is reached. The result of this test is presented in the Laboratory Summary.
CONSOLIDATION TESTS
Consolidation tests were performed in general accordance with ASTM D2435 on selected, relatively undisturbed, ring samples recovered from the exploratory excavations.
Samples are placed in a consolidometer where increasing load increments are applied in geometric progression. The soil specimen is placed between porous stones that allow H:\SWebb\Projects\21016-01 Picerne Group\21016-00 Picerne Group Geo FINAL JB 4 21 21.doc
PA2021-161
water to infiltrate and to flow of the soil sample. During the loading stages prior to the addition of water, the soil sample is sealed in order to prevent evaporation of soil water.
The load increment where water was added is indicated on the consolidation pressure curves. The percent consolidation for each load cycle is recorded as the ratio of the amount of vertical compression to the original 1-inch height. The results of these tests are presented graphically as an attachment in this Appendix.
SOLUBLE SULFATES
Soluble sulfate tests determined in general accordance with California Test Method No. 417 were also performed on representative samples collected during the field investigation. Soils with a sulfate concentration greater than 0.07% may be corrosive to metals; concentrations greater than 0.10% are considered potentially harmful to concrete and would require following the current ACI or CBC for "moderate" or more severe sulfate exposure requirements. The results of this test are presented in the Laboratory Summary.
PA2021-161
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
PA2021-161
PROJECT: THE PICERNE GROUP NO.: 21016-00 TECHNICIAN: RB DATE: 07-Apr-21 Hole No.
B 1
B2
Sample No.
Sample Depth:
3'
5'
10'
3'
5'
10'
z
z
A
W
Top
U
U
w
U
O U
Visual Soil Classification
�4
d
U
d
O
A
Bottom
A
� w
Pocket Penetrometer Reading, (tsf)
> 4.5
> 4.5
> 4.5
> 4.5
> 4.5
> 4.5
Weight of Moist Soil and Rings, (gms.)
969.90
959.20
1043.60
1009.20
987.60
1007.70
No. of Rings
5 5
5 5
5 5
Dish No.
A5
B 1
A8
B 12
B2
B 11
Weight of Moist Soil and Dish, (gms.)
141.81
162.58
195.43
163.08
168.66
174.19
Weight of Dry Soil and Dish, (gms.)
134.99
143.95
171.65
147.55
141.36
148.42
Weight of Dish, (gms.)
25.49 25.50
25.46 24.31
24.17 25.15
Weight of Dry Soil, (gms.)
109.50
118.45
146.19
123.24
117.19
123.27
Wet Density, (pcf)
123.9
122.2
136.2
130.5
126.9
130.3
Moisture Content, (%)
6.2 15.7
16.3 12.6
23.3 20.9
Dry Density, (pcf)
116.7
105.6
117.2
115.9
102.9
107.7
Degree of Saturation, (%) (G =2.68)
38.5 72.1
102.1
76.2 99.9
101.4
Void Ratio
0.433
0.584
0.427
0.443
0.625
0.552
Porosity
0.302
0.369
0.299
0.307
0.385
0.356
Remarks
18008 Sky Park Circle, Suite 250
KCGKLING
Consulting Irvine, Ca.92614
MOISTURE - DENSITY TEST
Group, Inc. Tel: (949)797-6241 Fax: (949)797-6260
PA2021-161
Project Number 21016-00 Tested by RB Date 4/12/2021
Project Name THE PICERNE GROUP Sampled by S.W Date 4/6/2021 Sample No. B2 Depth/Elev. 5' - 10' Location:
Sample Descriptions / Classification : DK. BROWN SANDY CLAY ( CL ) HYDROMETER ANALYSIS ASTM STD HYDROMETER 152H
Temp.(0C)
Meniscus Corr.
K Value
Hygroscopic Moisture
Wt.of Air Dry Sample, g
62.61 22
8.5 0.01312
Wet Weight of Soil,(g)
149.62
Wt.of Oven Dry Sample, (g)
60.38 21
8.5 0.01328
Dry Weight of Soil,(g)
144.28
Material Passing Sieve No.
10 Moisture Content,(%)
3.70 Specific Gravity (y) = 2.7 (Assumed) Correction Factor (a) = 0.99 Date
Time
psed
ime(min
Temp.
oC)
R'
C
R
% P
% P
Corrected
L
(cm)
k
Value
L/T
(cm/min)
Diameter
(mm)
12-Apr
7:42
0.25 0.50
1.00 22
36 8.5
27.5 45.1
44.9 10.4
0.01312
10.4000
0.04231
2.00 4.00
5.00 15.0
30.0 60.0
22 26
8.5 17.5
28.7 28.6
12.0 0.01312
0.20000
0.00587
240.0
1440.0
21 21
8.5 12.5
20.5 20.4
12.9 0.01328
0.00896
0.00126
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Sieve
Weight
Retained
Cummulative
fication
Specification
/o
Passing
Total Wt. of Dry Soil,(g)
313.55
Size
Opening
(mm)
Individual
(g)
Cummulative
(g)
o
/o
Retained
%
Passing
Moist Dry
3"
75.0 2"
50.0 (+)#10 Sieve, (g)
-
1 1-1/2"
38.1 (-)#10 Sieve, (g)
111.89
1 107.90
1"
25.0 Sand & Gravel Particle Descriptions
3/4"
19.0 1/2"
12.5 Shape
Rounded
3/8"
9.5 0.0
100.0
Angular
#4
4.75 -
0.0 100.0
Hardness
Hard & Durable
#8
2.36 Soft
#10
2.00 1.00
0.3 99.7
lWeathered & Friable
#16
1.18 #30
0.600
11.69 3.7
96.3 D10
D60
#50
0.300
30.59 9.8
90.2 D30
#100
0.150
87.61 27.9
72.1 Coefficient of Uniformity,C„
#DIV/0!
#200
0.075
133.18
42.5 57.5
Coefficient of Curvature,Cc
I #DIV/0!
Remarks
'" K L I N G 18008 Sky Park Circle, Suite 250
�J Cons lting Irvine, -a. yZn 14
Group, Inc. Tel: (949) 797 - 6241 Fax: (949) 797 - 6260
GRAIN - SIZE
ANALYSIS
US STD. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES US STD. SIEVE NUMBERS HYDROMETER
PA2021-161
COBBLES GRAVEL S A N D
COARSE I FINE COARSE MEDIUM FINE
c') co C0— C%j
100 1
70 M
50 An
30 20
10 J
PROJECT NUMBER
10.000 1.000 0.100
GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS
21016-00
SILT OR CLAY
PROJECT NAME
x
w
m
w
z
U-
z
w
U
re
w
a-
0.010 0.001
THE PICERNE GROUP
SAMPLE NO.
DEPTH
SYMBOL
CLASSIFICATION
NAT.W%
LL
PL
PI
B2
5' - 10'
CL
DK. BROWN SANDY CLAY
34 15
19 KCGKLING 18008 Sky Park Circlr, Suite 250 GRAIN - SIZE Consulting Irvine, Ca. 92614
roup, I nc • Tel: (949) 797 - 6241 Fax: (949) 797 - 6260 CURVE
PA2021-161
PROJECT NAME: THE PICERNE GROUF
BORING NUMBER: B2
SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS/CLASSIFICATION
PLASTIC LIMIT
DETERMINATION NO
1 2
DISH NO.
10 MASS OF DISH + WET SOIL,(Gms)
26.58 MASS OF DISH + DRY SOIL,(Gms)
24.65 MASS OF WATER,(Gms)
1.93 MASS OF DISH,(Gms)
11.4 MASS OF DRY SOIL,(Gms)
13.25 MOISTURE CONTENT,(%)
14.6 z
LU 35
z
O
U
W
d'
J
g 30
10 PROJECT NO: 21016-00 DATE : 13-Apr-21
SAMPLE NO./DEPTH : 5' - 10, TESTED BY RB
DK. RBOWN LEAN CLAY ( CL )
LIQUID LIMIT NATURAL
DETERMINATION NO.
1 2
3 DISH NUMBER
1 16
18 MASS, DISH + WET SOIL,(Gms)
11.81 11.80
11.69 MASS, DISH + DRY SOIL,(Gms)
9.82 9.89
9.86 MASS OF WATER,(Gms)
1.99 1.91
1.83 MASS OF DISH,(Gms)
4.21 4.21
4.17 MOISTURE CONTENT,(%)
35.5 33.6
32.2 NUMBER OF BLOWS
15 25
36 FLOW CURVE
25 NUMBER OF BLOWS
MOISTURE
CONTENT,%
0.00 #DIV/0!
100
RESULT SUMMARY
PLASTICITY
CHART
NATURAL MOISTURE
50 CONTENT, (%) -
q
of'A'
I
LIQUID LIMIT (LL) 34
th
n PI
0.7 -
ZO)
®
40 /
®
Equaftot
PLASTIC LIMIT (PL) 15
x
LU
Z 30
PLASTICITY INDEX (PI) 19
then
PI=0.
8)
•
20 J
a
107rffu
�J
SYMBOL FROM CL )
PLASTICITY CHART
I
10 �o
I
1 0OR
METHOD OF
PREPARATION
METHOD OF ILL
DETERMINATION
or
L
DRY
X
MULTIPOINT
X
WET
ONE -POINT
REMARKS:
0 0
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
LIQUID
LIMIT
KCGKLING 18008 Sky Park Circle, Suite 250
COrn-SUltir19 Irvine, Ca. 92614
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Group, Inc. Tel: (949) 797-6241 Fax: (949)797-6260
ASTM D4318-00
PA2021-161
0.1 0.0 A
Wei
2.0 3.0
4.0 0
w
= 5.0
z
w
(D
z
Q
6.0 Vail
M
M
10.0'
PROJECT NO.: 21016-00
BORING NO./LOCATION B2
SPECIFIC GRAVITY: 2.68 (Assumed)
REMARKS:
VERTICAL STRESS (TSF)
1.0 10.0
SOIL DESCRIPTIONS: BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL)
DEPTH / ELEV.: 5' LIQUID LIMIT : -
PLASTIC LIMIT: -
SPECIMEN HEIGHT
(INCHES)
MOISTURE CONTENT
( % )
DRY DENSITY
( PCF )
SATURATION
( % )
VOID
RATIO
INITIAL
1.0000
25.7 102.2
108.4
0.636
FINAL
0.9960
27.2 102.6
115.8
0.630
KCGKLING 18008 Sky Park Circle, Suite 250 CONSOLIDATION TEST onsuItirig Irvine, Ca.92614 CURVE
Group, Inc. Tel: (949)797-6241 Fax: (949)797-6260
PA2021-161
Project Name : THE PICERNE GROUP Project No. 21016-00
Boring / Sample No B1 Depth 3' (ft.) Tested By: RB Date: 8-Apr-21 Sample Descriptions Classification DR. BROWN SILTY FINE SAND (SIVI) Applied • •.•
1 1
1 Lateral Displacement, • 1
Displacement • 0.05
Elapsed Time of Test, te 7.20 (min.)
Specimen Undisturbed
Remolded
Reconstituted
®®
Shear Stress, (Ultimate) (ksf)1
•:
1`
and Saturation
WeightDensity
Wet of • • (gmsimmmmmm
WeightDry of • • (gmsimmmmmm
of Water (gms1M=M===
Weight of Ring (gms)1M=M=M=
WeightWeight
of Dry Soil•
m®mmm®
Moisture•
' .
M®=®MM
• • •
11 100
Dry Density
•
M®M=M=
Remarks
Specific-•
.:
Thickness of •
11 Degree of •
®®M®
• 1
1 1
1 1
1 ` 1 1 • 1
1 1 • 1 1 1
KCGConsulting
:11: Sky Park Circle, Suite 250
Irvine, Ca. 92614
DIRECT SHEAR
TEST
PA2021-161
PROJECT NAME THE PICERNE GROUP PROJECT NUMBER 21016-00
TRACT NUMBER: TESTED BY: RB DATE: 9-Apr-21
LOT NUMBER: SAMPLED BY: S.W DATE: 07-Apr-21
SAMPLE NO.: LOCATION: 131 @ 0' -10'
SOIL DESCRIPTIONS / CLASSIFICATION : DK. BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL)
TRIAL NUMBER
1 2
3 4
WET WT. OF SOIL + RING (g)
570.03
616.00
WEIGHT OF RING (g)
204.27
204.27
WET WEIGHT OF SOIL (g)
365.76
411.73
FACTOR
0.3030
0.3030
WET DENSITY (pcf)
110.8
124.8
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
105.4
114.8
DEGREE OF SATURATION (%)
23.1 50.2
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
WET WEIGHT OF SOIL (g)
308.14
305.27
DRY WEIGHT OF SOIL (g)
293.14
280.84
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
5.1 8.7
FINAL DENSITY & SATURATION
WET WT. + RING (g)
DRY WT. + RING (g)
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SAMPLE LENGTH (cm)
SAMPLE AREA (cm2)
VOLUME (cc)
WT. OF RING (g)
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
SPEC.GRAVITY (assumed)
2.70 SATURATION (%)
% RETAINED ON #4 SIEVE
REMARKS:
RACK NO. :
SURCHARGE
144 psf
DATE
TIME
ELAPSED
TIME (min.)
DIAL READING
( in. )
DEFLECTION
( in. )
9-Apr
9:00
0.221
9-Apr
1 11:00
0.245
12-Apr
710
0.283
0.062
E. 1.
62 SO4 270 ppm
KCGConsultirig
KLING
18008 Sky Park Circle, Suite 250
Irvine, Ca.92614
EXPANSION
INDEX
Group, Inc.
Tel: (949)797-6241 Fax: (949)797-6260
( UBC 18-2 )
PA2021-161
PROJECT NAME THE PICERNE GROUP PROJECT NUMBER 21016-00
TRACT NUMBER: TESTED BY: RB DATE: 9-Apr-21
LOT NUMBER: SAMPLED BY: S.W DATE: 07-Apr-21
SAMPLE NO.: LOCATION: B2 @ 5' -10'
SOIL DESCRIPTIONS / CLASSIFICATION : DK. BROWN SANDY CLAY (CL)
TRIAL NUMBER
1 2
3 4
WET WT. OF SOIL + RING (g)
574.19
606.95
WEIGHT OF RING (g)
204.39
204.39
WET WEIGHT OF SOIL (g)
369.80
402.56
FACTOR
0.3030
0.3030
WET DENSITY (pcf)
112.0
122.0
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
105.6
111.4
DEGREE OF SATURATION (%)
27.6 50.0
MOISTURE DETERMINATION
WET WEIGHT OF SOIL (g)
312.59
308.03
DRY WEIGHT OF SOIL (q)
294.64
281.31
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
6.1 9.5
FINAL DENSITY & SATURATION
WET WT. + RING (g)
DRY WT. + RING (g)
MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
SAMPLE LENGTH (cm)
SAMPLE AREA (cm2)
VOLUME (cc)
WT. OF RING (g)
DRY DENSITY (pcf)
SPEC.GRAVITY (assumed)
2.70 SATURATION (%)
% RETAINED ON #4 SIEVE
REMARKS:
RACK NO. :
SURCHARGE
144 psf
DATE
TIME
ELAPSED
TIME (min.)
DIAL READING
( in. )
DEFLECTION
( in. )
9-Apr
9:43
0.597
9-Apr
1 11:00
0.613
12-Apr
710
0.658
0.061
E. I.
61 SO4 ppm
KCGConsultirig
KLING
18008 Sky Park Circle, Suite 250
Irvine, Ca.92614
EXPANSION
INDEX
Group, Inc.
Tel: (949)797-6241 Fax: (949)797-6260
( UBC 18-2 )
PA2021-161
APPENDIX D
SEISMIC SETTLEMENT ASSESSMENT
PA2021-161
Hole No.= Water Depth=10 ft Magnitude=6.89
Acceleration=0.612g
Shear Stress Ratio Factor of Safety Settlement
M0 0 0.5 0 1 5 0 (in.) 1
10 20
30 40
fs1=1
S=0.36in.
50 CRR CSR fs1— Saturated —
Shaded Zone has Liquefaction Potential Unsaturat. —
60 70
Plate A-1
PA2021-161
M0
10 20
30 40
Hole No.= Water Depth=10 ft
Magnitude=6.89
Acceleration=0.612g
Factor of Safety Settlement
0.5 0 1 5 0 (in.)
fs1=1
50 CRR CSR fs1—
Shaded Zone has Liquefaction Potential
60 70
Shear Stress Ratio
0 S = 0.54 in.
Unsaturat. —
Plate A-1
PA2021-161
APPENDIX E
HARDSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS
PA2021-161
KCGKLING
Consulting
Group, Inc.
HARDSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EXPANSIVE SOILS
(Residential)
Minimum Concrete
Subgrade
Cutoff Barrier or
Joint (2), (5)
Base
Reinforcement (�) (3) (5)
Description
Thickness (Inches)
Pre -Soaking Depth
Edge Thickness
Spacing
(Inches
Max
Common Sidewalks - Isolated
N.R.
4-5 Feet
N.R.
EI 130
4 (Nominal)
140% of Optimum to 18"
24 (or 5% over optimum, whichever is
greater)
Common Sidewalks - Not Isolated (N.I.)
For exposed edges utilize
4-5 Feet
N.R.
EI 130
4 (Full)
140% of Optimum to 24"
#4 @ 12" OC,EW
(or 5% over optimum, whichever is
greater)
City/County Standard Sidewalks
4 (Nominal)
Same as Common Sidewalk
Same as Common Sidewalk
Same as Common Sidewalk
4-5 Feet
N.R.
or C.S.
Not Isolated or C.S.
Not Isolated or C.S.
No Isolated or C.S.
Private Driveways (1 Unit)
4 (Full)
Same as Common Sidewalk
6x6 - W2.9xW2.9 Mesh
Same as Common Sidewalk
10 Feet
N.R.
Not Isolated
Isolated
Shared Driveways (2 Units)
5 (Full)
Same as Common Sidewalk
6x6 - W2.9xW2.9 Mesh
Same as Common Sidewalk
10 Feet
N.R.
Not Isolated
Isolated
Courts or Enhanced Concrete
Sand Leveling course,
(where higher degree of crack control is desired)
if desired
EI 130
6 (Full)
140% of Optimum to 24"
#4 @ 12" OC,EW
24 8 Feet
(or 5% over optimum, whichever is
greater)
Concrete Pavement (°)
6.0 N.R.
Same as for Courts
Same as for Courts
10 Feet
6" aggregate base
Patios and Entryways
N.K.
E 130
4 (Full)
130% of Optimum to 24"
#3 @ 12" OC,EW
24 5 Feet
(or 5% over optimum, whichever
isgreater)
Other Considerations:
Square concrete panels when possible
Maintain positive drainage for concrete flatwork
NR = Not required; C.S. = City/County Standard;
OC = On Center
EW = Each Way
NI = Not Isolated
Notes: General Notes:
(1) Reinforcement to extend into cutoff barrier in thickened edge The recommendations herein should be considered as general guidelines and should be implemented if a "moderate" degree of crack control is desired. Should a higher degree of risk management be desired, these recommendations could be revised upon request. (2) Joint at curves or angle points
(3) Reinforcement may be superseded by the structural engineer (4) Actual design should be based on soil "k" value and proposed traffic loads.
Reinforcement and joint spacing requirements should be determined by the structural engineer. (5) These recommendations are not intended to mitigate against cracking caused by shrinkage and temperature warping.
Mitigation of these aspects should be provided by the structural engineer.
E:\Master\Master Forms\Appendices for Reports\Hardscape Recommendations for Residential-10-96.doc
PA2021-161
APPENDIX F
ASFE INSERT
PA2021-161
Geolechnical Engineering RePOPI --)
Geotechnical Services Are Performed for
Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects
Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical engineering study conducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a construction contractor or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical engineering study is unique, each geo- technical engineering report is unique, prepared solelyfor the client. No one except you should rely on your geotechnical engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one - not even you - should apply the report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated.
Read the Full Report
Serious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary.
Do not read selected elements only.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based on
A Unique Set of Project -Specific Factors
Geotechnical engineers consider a number of unique, project -specific factors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the client's goals, objectives, and risk management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engi- neer who conducted the study specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report that was:
• not prepared for you,
• not prepared for your project,
• not prepared for the specific site explored, or
• completed before important project changes were made.
Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical engineering report include those that affect:
• the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from alight industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse,
• elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure,
• composition of the design team, or
• project ownership.
As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes - even minor ones - and request an assessment of their impact.
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed.
Subsurface Conditions Can Change
A geotechnical engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the study was performed. Do not rely on a geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; by man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or by natu- ral events, such as floods, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Always contact the geotechnical engineer before applying the report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems.
Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional
Opinions
Site exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ -sometimes significantly from those indi- cated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions.
A Report's Recommendations Are Not Final
Do not overrely on the construction recommendations included in your re- port. Those recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual
PA2021-161
subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engi- neer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report's recommendations if that engineer does not perform construction observation.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject to
Misinterpretation
Other design team members' misinterpretation of geotechnical engineer- ing reports has resulted in costly problems. Lower that risk by having your geotechnical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review pertinent elements of the design team's plans and specifications. Contractors can also misinterpret a geotechnical engineering report. Reduce that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing construction observation.
Do Not Redraw the Engineer's Logs
Geotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings.
Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk.
Give Contractors a Complete Report and
Guidance
Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make contractors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give con- tractors the complete geotechnical engineering report, butpreface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise contractors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report's accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct ad- ditional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer.
A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure contractors have sufficient timeto perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give contractors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unantici- pated conditions.
Read Responsibility Provisions Closely
Some clients, design professionals, and contractors do not recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines.
This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations" many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly.
Geoenviponmental Concerns Are Not Covered
The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform a geoenviron- mental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical engineering report does not usually re- late any geoenvironmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own geoenvironmental in- formation, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk management guidance.
Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else.
Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with Mold
Diverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction, op- eration, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from grow- ing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be devised for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a comprehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional mold prevention consultant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, a number of mold prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry. While groundwater, wa- ter infiltration, and similar issues may have been addressed as part of the geotechnical engineering study whose findings are conveyed in -this report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services performed in connection with the geotechnical engineer's study were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold prevention. Proper, implementation of the recommendations conveyed in this report will not of itself he sufficient to prevent mold from growing in or on the struc- ture involved.
Rely on Your ASFE-Member Geotechnical
Engineer For Additional Assistance
Membership in ASFE/The Best People on Earth exposes geotechnical engi- neers to a wide array of risk management techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with your ASFE-member geotechnical engineer for more information.