Newport Beach City Council
April 9, 2024

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May M, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: North of Coast Highway

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,400 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,640 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -0.43
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 0.20
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -17.67
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -17.04
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -21.62
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -21.00
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

62.7 60.8

59.1 53.0

61.6 62.2
Autos.,

63.3 61.4

59.7 53.6

62.2 62.9
Medium Trucks:

56.5 55.0

48.6 47.1

55.5 55.8
Medium Trucks:

57.1 55.6

49.2 47.7

56.1 56.4
Heavy Trucks.

57.3 55.9

46.9 48.1

56.5 56.6
Heavy Trucks.

57.9 56.5

47.5 48.7

57.1 57.2
Vehicle Noise:

64.6 62.8

59.7 55.0

63.5 64.0
Vehicle Noise:

65.2 63.4

60.3 55.6

64.2 64.6
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
37 80
172
370
Ldn:
41 88
189
407
CNEL:
40 86
184
397
CNEL:
44 94
203
437
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-61
Tuesday, May M, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Rosa
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT
DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
3,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
380 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAtfim I Bem1 Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Rosa
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,800
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,680 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -6.15
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 0.30
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -23.39
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -16.94
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -27.35
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -20.89
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Notse Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Lon
CNEL
Autos.,

56.7 54.8

53.0 47.0

55.6 56.2
Autos.,

63.2 61.3

59.5 53.4

62.1 62.7
Medium Trucks:

50.5 49.0

42.6 41.1

49.5 49.7
Medium Trucks:

56.9 55.4

49.1 47.5

56.0 56.2
Heavy Trucks:

51.3 49.9

40.9 42.1

50.5 50.6
Heavy Trucks:

57.8 56.3

47.3 48.6

56.9 57.0
Vehicle Noise:

58.5 56.8

53.7 49.0

57.5 58.0
Vehicle Noise:

65.0 63.3

60.1 55.4

64.0 64.4
Centeriine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centeriine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
15 32
68 147
Ldn:
40 85
184
397
CNEL:
16 34
73 158
CNEL:
43 92
197
425
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Rosa
Job Number 8211
Road Segment: North of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Trafc (Adt): 14,300
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,430 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Be Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May M, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Rosa
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
7,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
790 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Autos:

68.46 -0.40
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -2.97
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -17.64
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -20.21
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -21.59
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -24.17
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

62.5 60.6

58.8 52.7

61.4 62.0
Autos.,

59.9 58.0

56.2 50.2

58.8 59.4
Medium Trucks:

56.2 54.7

48.4 46.8

55.3 55.5
Medium Trucks:

53.6 52.1

45.8 44.2

52.7 52.9
Heavy Trucks:

57.1 55.6

46.6 47.9

56.2 56.3
Heavy Trucks:

54.5 53.1

44.0 45.3

53.6 53.8
Vehicle Noise:

64.3 62.6

59.4 54.7

63.3 63.7
Vehicle Noise:

61.7 60.0

56.8 52.2

60.7 61.2
Centeriine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centeriine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
36 77
165
356
Ldn:
24 52
ill
240
CNEL:
38 82
177
382
CNEL:
26 55
119
257
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-62
Tuesday, May M, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Avocado
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
5,000 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
500 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centedine Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BardarAtfen I Bem1 Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Avocado
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: South of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
15,500 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,550 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centedine Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

66.51 -4.45
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

66.51 0.46
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -21.69
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -16.77
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

82.99 -25.64
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

82.99 -20.73
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Lon
CNEL
Autos.,

56.3 54.4

52.7 46.6

55.2 55.9
Autos.,

61.3 59.4

57.6 51.5

60.2 60.8
Medium Trucks:

50.3 48.8

42.4 40.9

49.4 49.6
Medium Trucks:

55.2 53.7

47.4 45.8

54.3 54.5
Heavy Trucks.

51.6 50.2

41.2 42.4

50.8 50.9
Heavy Trucks.

56.5 55.1

46.1 47.3

55.7 55.8
Vehicle Noise:

58.4 56.6

53.3 48.8

57.3 57.8
Vehicle Noise:

63.3 61.5

58.3 53.7

62.2 62.7
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
14 31
66 143
Ldn:
30 66
141
304
CNEL:
15 33
71 153
CNEL:
33 70
151
326
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Avocado
Job Number 8211
Road Segment: North of Coast Highway

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,000 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,100 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centedine Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May M, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macerthur
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment North of Bonita Canyon

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 80,500 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
8,050 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centedine Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

66.51 -1.03
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 7.11
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -18.26
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -10.13
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

82.99 -22.22
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -14.09
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

59.8 57.9

56.1 50.1

58.7 59.3
Autos.,

70.3 68.4

66.6 60.5

69.2 69.8
Medium Trucks:

53.7 52.2

45.9 44.3

52.8 53.0
Medium Trucks:

64.0 62.5

56.1 54.6

63.1 63.3
Heavy Trucks.

55.1 53.6

44.6 45.9

54.2 54.3
Heavy Trucks.

64.9 63.4

54.4 55.6

64.0 64.1
Vehicle Noise:

61.8 60.0

56.8 52.2

60.8 61.2
Vehicle Noise:

72.1 70.3

67.2 62.5

71.1 71.5
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
24 52
112
242
Ldn:
118
254
546
1,177
CNEL:
26 56
120
259
CNEL:
126
272
586
1,262
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-63
Tuesday, May M, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: South of Bonita
Canyon

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt):
69,200 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
6,920 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TmMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BerrierAtten I Bemr Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: North of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt): 68,100 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
6,810 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BerrierAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 6.45
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 6.38
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -10.79
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -10.86
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -14.74
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -14.81
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Toper and harrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

69.6 67.7

65.9 59.9

68.5 69.1
Autos.,

69.5 67.6

65.9 59.8

68.4 69.0
Medium Trucks:

63.3 61.8

55.5 53.9

62.4 62.6
Medium Trucks:

63.3 61.8

55.4 53.9

62.3 62.6
Heavy Trucks:

64.2 62.8

53.7 55.0

63.3 63.5
Heavy Trucks:
64A

62.7 53.7

54.9 63.3

63.4 Vehicle Noise:

71.4 69.7

66.5 61.9

70.4 70.9
Vehicle Noise:

71.4 69.6

66.5 61.8

70.3 70.8
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
106
229
494
1,064
Ldn:
105
227
489
1,053
CNEL:
114
246
530
1,141
CNEL:
113
243
524
1,129
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Number 8211
Road Segment: South of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt): 43,400 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
4,340 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer,
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May M, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt): 38,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,880 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BerrierAtten Bemr Allen
Autos:

68.46 4.42
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 3.94
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -12.81
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -13.30
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -16.77
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -17.26
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Toper and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

67.6 65.7

63.9 57.9

66.5 67.1
Autos.,

67.1 65.2

63.4 57.4

66.0 66.6
Medium Trucks:

61.3 59.8

53.5 51.9

60.4 60.6
Medium Trucks:

60.8 59.3

53.0 51.4

59.9 60.1
Heavy Trucks:

62.2 60.7

51.7 53.0

61.3 61.4
Heavy Trucks:

61.7 60.3

51.2 52.5

60.8 61.0
Vehicle Noise:

69.4 67.7

64.5 59.8

68.4 68.8
Vehicle Noise:

68.9 67.2

64.0 59.3

67.9 68.3
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dRA
Ldn:
78 168
362
779
Ldn:
72 156
336
723
CNEL:
84 180
388
836
CNEL:
78 167
360
776
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-64
Tuesday, May M, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Number 8211
Road Segment: South of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 32,400 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,240 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
Treffic Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAffen I Bem1 Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Number 8211
Road Segment: North of Coast Highway

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 32,500 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,250 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAffen I Bann Allen
Autos.

68.46 3.15
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 3.17
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -14.08
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -14.07
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -18.04
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -18.03
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leg Peak Hour I
Leg Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leg Peak Hour I
Leg Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

66.3 64.4

62.6 56.6

65.2 65.8
Autos.,

66.3 64.4

62.6 56.6

65.2 65.8
Medium Trucks:

60.1 58.5

52.2 50.6

59.1 59.3
Medium Trucks:

60.1 58.6

52.2 50.7

59.1 59.3
Heavy Trucks:

60.9 59.5

50.4 51.7

60.0 60.2
Heavy Trucks:

60.9 59.5

50.5 51.7

60.1 60.2
Vehicle Noise:

68.1 66.4

63.2 58.6

67.1 67.6
Vehicle Noise:

68.1 66.4

63.3 58.6

67.1 67.6
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
64 138
298
641
Ldn:
64 138
298
643
CNEL:
69 148
319
688
CNEL:
69 149
320
690
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita
Cyn
Job Number 8211
Road Segment: Westof Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
15,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,530 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer,
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Be Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May M, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita
Cyn
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
12,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,230 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAffen Bem1 Allen
Autos:

68.46 -0.10
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -1.05
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -17.34
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -18.29
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -21.30
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks.,

84.25 -22.25
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leg Peak Hour
Leg Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Lag Peak Hour I
Leg Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

62.8 60.9

59.1 53.0

61.7 62.3
Autos.,

61.8 59.9

58.1 52.1

60.7 61.3
Medium Trucks:

56.5 55.0

48.6 47.1

55.6 55.8
Medium Trucks:

55.6 54.1

47.7 46.2

54.6 54.8
Heavy Tmcks:

57.4 55.9

46.9 48.2

56.5 56.6
Heavy Tmcks:

56.4 55.0

46.0 47.2

55.6 55.7
Vehicle Noise:

64.6 62.9

59.7 55.0

63.6 64.0
Vehicle Noise:

63.6 61.9

58.8 54.1

62.6 63.1
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
37 80
173
373
Ldn:
32 69
150
322
CNEL:
40 86
186
400
CNEL:
35 74
160
346
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-65
Tuesday, May M, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita
Cyn
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: West of Bonita Canyon

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt):
10,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,060 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TmMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAtfim I Bem1 Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita
Cyn
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Bonita Canyon

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt):
39,400 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,940 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 -1.70
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 4.00
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -18.94
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -13.23
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -22.89
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -17.19
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

61.2 59.3

57.5 51.4

60.1 60.7
Autos.,

66.9 65.0

63.2 57.2

65.8 66.4
Medium Trucks:

54.9 53.4

47.1 45.5

54.0 54.2
Medium Trucks:

60.6 59.1

52.8 51.2

59.7 59.9
Heavy Trucks:

55.8 54.3

45.3 46.6

54.9 55.0
Heavy Trucks:

61.5 60.0

51.0 52.3

60.6 60.7
Vehicle Noise:

63.0 61.3

58.1 53.4

62.0 62.4
Vehicle Noise:

68.7 67.0

63.8 59.1

67.7 68.1
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
29 63
135
292
Ldn:
70 151
325
700
CNEL:
31 67
145
313
CNEL:
75 162
349
751
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: Westof Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Tmftic (Adt):
5,000 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
500 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: Eastof Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt):
20,400 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,040 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Autos:

68.46 -4.96
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 1.15
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -22.20
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -16.09
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -26.16
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -20.05
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

58.2 56.3

54.5 48.5

57.1 57.7
Autos.,

64.3 62.4

60.6 54.6

63.2 63.8
Medium Trucks:

51.9 50.4

44.1 42.5

51.0 51.2
Medium Trucks:

58.0 56.5

50.2 48.6

57.1 57.3
Heavy Trucks:

52.8 51.4

42.3 43.6

51.9 52.1
Heavy Trucks:

58.9 57.5

48.4 49.7

58.0 58.2
Vehicle Noise:

60.0 58.3

55.1 50.4

59.0 59.4
Vehicle Noise:

66.1 64.4

61.2 56.6

65.1 65.6
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
18 40
86 185
Ldn:
47 102
219
471
CNEL:
20 43
92 198
CNEL:
51 109
235
505
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-66
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: West of Santa Cruz

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Tmllic (Adt):
23,700 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,370 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise S- Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel SarnerAtten I Bem1 Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Number 8211
Road Segment: East of Santa Cruz

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt):
15,000 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,500 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel SarnerAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 1.80
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -0.19
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -15.44
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -17.43
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -19.40
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -21.38
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLoq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

64.9 63.0

61.3 55.2

63.8 64.5
Autos.,

63.0 61.1

59.3 53.2

61.9 62.5
Medium Trucks:

58.7 57.2

50.8 49.3

57.7 58.0
Medium Trucks:

56.7 55.2

48.8 47.3

55.8 56.0
Heavy Trucks:

59.5 58.1

49.1 50.3

58.7 58.8
Heavy Trucks:

57.6 56.1

47.1 48.3

56.7 56.8
Vehicle Noise:

66.8 65.0

61.9 57.2

65.7 66.2
Vehicle Noise:

64.8 63.0

59.9 55.2

63.8 64.2
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
52 112
242
521
Ldn:
38 83
178
384
CNEL:
56 120
259
559
CNEL:
41 89
191
412
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Number 8211
Road Segment: West of Santa Rosa

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Tmllic (Adt):
17,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,730 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer,
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Santa Rosa

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt):
22,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,290 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height(Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Semi Bem1 Allen
Autos:

68.46 0.43
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 1.65
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -16.81
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -15.59
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -20.76
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -19.55
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

63.6 61.7

59.9 53.9

62.5 63.1
Autos.,

64.8 62.9

61.1 55.1

63.7 64.3
Medium Trucks:

57.3 55.8

49.5 47.9

56.4 56.6
Medium Trucks:

58.5 57.0

50.7 49.1

57.6 57.8
Heavy Trucks:

58.2 56.8

47.7 49.0

57.3 57.4
Heavy Trucks:

59.4 58.0

48.9 50.2

58.5 58.7
Vehicle Noise:

65.4 63.7

60.5 55.8

64.4 64.8
Vehicle Noise:

66.6 64.9

61.7 57.1

65.6 66.1
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
I
7o deA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
42 91
196
422
Ldn:
51 110
236
509
CNEL:
45 98
210
453
CNEL:
55 118
253
546
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-67
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin Hills
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: Westof Macarthur

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Tmilic (Adt): 23,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,360 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise S- Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right Vie-

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
Tmfrc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel SarnierAtten I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: Eastof Macarthur

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
21,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,130 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feel)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0 %
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel SarnierAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 1.78
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos.

68.46 1.33
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -15.46
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -15.91
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -19.42
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -19.86
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

64.9 63.0

61.3 55.2

63.8 64.4
Autos.,

64.5 62.6

60.8 54.8

63.4 64.0
Medium Trucks:

58.7 57.2

50.8 49.3

57.7 58.0
Medium Trucks:

58.2 56.7

50.4 48.8

57.3 57.5
Heavy Trucks:

59.5 58.1

49.1 50.3

58.7 58.8
Heavy Trucks:

59.1 57.7

48.6 49.9

58.2 58.4
Vehicle Noise:

66.8 65.0

61.9 57.2

65.7 66.2
Vehicle Noise:

66.3 64.6

61.4 56.7

65.3 65.7
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
52 112
241
519
Ldn:
48 104
225
485
CNEL:
56 120
259
557
CNEL:
52 112
241
520
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Clemente
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Santa Barbara

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
5,700 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
570 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tracks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0 %
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Clemente
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: West of Santa Cruz

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Tmilic (Adt):
5,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
590 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tracks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height(Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feel)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0 %
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Semi Berm Allen
Autos.

66.51 -3.88
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos.

66.51 -3.73
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -21.12
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -20.97
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

82.99 -25.07
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

82.99 -24.93
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

56.9 55.0

53.3 47.2

55.8 56.4
Autos.,

57.1 55.2

53.4 47.3

56.0 56.6
Medium Trucks:

50.9 49.4

43.0 41.5

49.9 50.2
Medium Trucks:

51.0 49.5

43.2 41.6

50.1 50.3
Heavy Trucks:

52.2 50.8

41.7 43.0

51.4 51.5
Heavy Trucks:

52.4 50.9

41.9 43.1

51.5 51.6
Vehicle Noise:

58.9 57.2

53.9 49.4

57.9 58.3
Vehicle Noise:

59.1 57.3

54.1 49.5

58.1 58.5
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
16 34
72 156
Ldn:
16 34
74 160
CNEL:
17 36
78 167
CNEL:
17 37
79 171
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Barbara
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: Westof Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt):
2,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
230 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(O-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BerrierAtten I Bemr Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Barbara
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: East of Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt):
12,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,290 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(O-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0 %
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BerrierAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

66.51 -7.82
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

66.51 -0.33
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -25.06
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -17.57
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

82.99 -29.02
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

82.99 -21.53
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

53.0 51.1

49.3 43.3

51.9 52.5
Autos.,

60.5 58.6

56.8 50.7

59.4 60.0
Medium Trucks:

46.9 45.4

39.1 37.5

46.0 46.2
Medium Trucks:

54.4 52.9

46.6 45.0

53.5 53.7
Heavy Trucks:

48.3 46.8

37.8 39.1

47.4 47.5
Heavy Trucks:

55.8 54.3

45.3 46.5

54.9 55.0
Vehicle Noise:

55.0 53.3

50.0 45.4

54.0 54.4
Vehicle Noise:

62.5 60.7

57.5 52.9

61.4 61.9
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
9 18
40 85
Ldn:
27 58
125
269
CNEL:
9 20
42 91
CNEL:
29 62
134
288
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Barbara
Job Number 8211
Road Segment North of San Clemente

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt): 12,600
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,260 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(O-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0 %
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TmMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May M, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Barbara
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of San Clemente

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt):
7,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
790 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(O-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0 %
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BerrierAtten Bemr Allen
Autos:

66.51 -0.44
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

66.51 -2.46
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -17.67
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -19.70
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

82.99 -21.63
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

82.99 -23.66
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
UnV.gated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

60.4 58.5

56.7 50.6

59.3 59.9
Autos.,

58.3 56.4

54.7 48.6

57.2 57.8
Medium Trucks:

54.3 52.8

46.5 44.9

53.4 53.6
Medium Trucks:

52.3 50.8

44.4 42.9

51.3 51.6
Heavy Trucks:

55.6 54.2

45.2 46.4

54.8 54.9
Heavy Trucks:

53.6 52.2

43.2 44.4

52.8 52.9
Vehicle Noise:

62.4 60.6

57.4 52.8

61.3 61.8
Vehicle Noise:

60.3 58.6

55.3 50.8

59.3 59.8
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
I
7o deA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
26 57
123
265
Ldn:
19 42
90 194
CNEL:
28 61
132
284
CNEL:
21 45
96 208
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-69
Tuesday, May M, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Barbara
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: West of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT
DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
6,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
690 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAtfim I Bem1 Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Barbara
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: East of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
3,700 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
370 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

66.51 -3.05
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

66.51 -5.76
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -20.29
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -23.00
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

82.99 -24.25
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

82.99 -26.95
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Lon
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Lon
CNEL
Autos.,

57.7 55.8

54.1 48.0

56.6 57.3
Autos.,

55.0 53.1

51.4 45.3

53.9 54.5
Medium Trucks:

51.7 50.2

43.8 42.3

50.8 51.0
Medium Trucks:

49.0 47.5

41.1 39.6

48.1 48.3
Heavy Trucks.

53.0 51.6

42.6 43.8

52.2 52.3
Heavy Trucks.

50.3 48.9

39.9 41.1

49.5 49.6
Vehicle Noise:

59.8 58.0

54.7 50.2

58.7 59.2
Vehicle Noise:

57.0 55.3

52.0 47.5

56.0 56.5
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
18 38
82 177
Ldn:
12 25
54 117
CNEL:
19 41
88 190
CNEL:
13 27
58 125
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Miguel
Job Number 8211
Road Segment: West of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
9,100 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
910 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Be Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Miguel
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,400
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,440 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -2.36
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -0.37
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -19.60
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -17.61
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -23.55
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -21.56
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

60.5 58.6

56.8 50.8

59.4 60.0
Autos.,

62.5 60.6

58.8 52.8

61.4 62.0
Medium Trucks:

54.3 52.8

46.4 44.8

53.3 53.5
Medium Trucks:

56.3 54.7

48.4 46.8

55.3 55.5
Heavy Trucks.

55.1 53.7

44.6 45.9

54.3 54.4
Heavy Trucks.

57.1 55.7

46.6 47.9

56.2 56.4
Vehicle Noise:

62.3 60.6

57.4 52.8

61.3 61.8
Vehicle Noise:

64.3 62.6

59.4 54.8

63.3 63.8
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
26 57
122
264
Ldn:
36 77
166
358
CNEL:
28 61
131
283
CNEL:
38 83
178
384
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-70
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Miguel
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: Westof Avacado

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT
DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt): 18,100
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,810 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Sourae Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TreMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAtfim I Bem1 Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Miguel
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Avacado

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt): 26,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,680 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 0.63
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 2.33
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -16.61
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -14.91
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -20.57
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -18.86
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

63.5 61.6

59.8 53.8

62.4 63.0
Autos.,

65.2 63.3

61.5 55.5

64.1 64.7
Medium Trucks:

57.2 55.7

49.4 47.8

56.3 56.5
Medium Trucks:

59.0 57.4

51.1 49.5

58.0 58.2
Heavy Trucks:

58.1 56.7

47.6 48.9

57.2 57.4
Heavy Trucks:

59.8 58.4

49.3 50.6

58.9 59.1
Vehicle Noise:

65.3 63.6

60.4 55.8

64.3 64.8
Vehicle Noise:

67.0 65.3

62.1 57.5

66.0 66.5
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
42 90
193
417
Ldn:
54 117
251
541
CNEL:
45 96
208
447
CNEL:
58 125
270
581
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Miguel
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: Westof Macarthur

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt): 25,000 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,500 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer,
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Be Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May M, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Miguel
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: Eastof Macarthur

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TmMc (Adt): 12,500
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,250 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height(Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 2.03
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -0.98
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -15.21
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -18.22
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -19.17
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -22.18
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

64.9 63.0

61.2 55.2

63.8 64.4
Autos.,

61.9 60.0

58.2 52.2

60.8 61.4
Medium Trucks:

58.6 57.1

50.8 49.2

57.7 57.9
Medium Trucks:

55.6 54.1

47.8 46.2

54.7 54.9
Heavy Trucks:

59.5 58.1

49.0 50.3

58.6 58.8
Heavy Trucks:

56.5 55.1

46.0 47.3

55.6 55.8
Vehicle Noise:

66.7 65.0

61.8 57.2

65.7 66.2
Vehicle Noise:

63.7 62.0

58.8 54.1

62.7 63.1
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 deA
Ldn:
52 ill
240
517
Ldn:
33 70
151
326
CNEL:
55 119
257
555
CNEL:
35 75
162
349
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-71
Tuesday, May M, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Coast Highway
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: Westof Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
71,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
7,160 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BandarAtten I Bem1 Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Coast Highway
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: East of Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
58,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
5,830 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BanderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 6.60
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 5.71
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -10.64
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -11.53
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -14.60
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -15.49
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

69.7 67.8

66.1 60.0

68.6 69.3
Autos.,

68.9 67.0

65.2 59.1

67.8 68.4
Medium Trucks:

63.5 62.0

55.6 54.1

62.5 62.8
Medium Trucks:

62.6 61.1

54.7 53.2

61.7 61.9
Heavy Trucks:

64.3 62.9

53.9 55.1

63.5 63.6
Heavy Trucks:

63.4 62.0

53.0 54.2

62.6 62.7
Vehicle Noise:

71.6 69.8

66.7 62.0

70.6 71.0
Vehicle Noise:

70.7 68.9

65.8 61.1

69.7 70.1
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
109
234
505
1,088
Ldn:
95 204
440
949
CNEL:
117
252
542
1,167
CNEL:
102
219
472
1,018
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Coast Highway
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: West of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TraOic (Adt):
54,100 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
5,410 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tracks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barter
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer,
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barter Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Coast Highway
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
45,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
4,530 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tracks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Autos:

68.46 5.38
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 4.61
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -11.86
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -12.63
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -15.81
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -16.58
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

68.5 66.6

64.9 58.8

67.4 68.0
Autos.,

67.8 65.9

64.1 58.0

66.7 67.3
Medium Trucks:

62.3 60.8

54.4 52.9

61.3 61.6
Medium Trucks:

61.5 60.0

53.6 52.1

60.6 60.8
Heavy Trucks.

63.1 61.7

52.7 53.9

62.3 62.4
Heavy Trucks.

62.4 60.9

51.9 53.1

61.5 61.6
Vehicle Noise:

70.4 68.6

65.5 60.8

69.3 69.8
Vehicle Noise:

69.6 67.8

64.7 60.0

68.6 69.0
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
90 195
419
903
Ldn:
80 173
372
802
CNEL:
97 209
450
968
CNEL:
86 185
399
860
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-72
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Coast Highway
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: Westof Avacado

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 43,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
4,380 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TreMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Band rAtfim I Bem1 Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Coast Highway
Jab Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Avacado

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
45,100 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
4,510 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 4.46
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 4.59
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -12.77
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -12.65
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -16.73
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -16.60
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

67.6 65.7

63.9 57.9

66.5 67.1
Autos.,

67.7 65.8

64.1 58.0

66.6 67.2
Medium Trucks:

61.4 59.9

53.5 51.9

60.4 60.6
Medium Trucks:

61.5 60.0

53.6 52.1

60.5 60.8
Heavy Trucks:

62.2 60.8

51.8 53.0

61.4 61.5
Heavy Trucks:

62.3 60.9

51.9 53.1

61.5 61.6
Vehicle Noise:

69.4 67.7

64.6 59.9

68.4 68.9
Vehicle Noise:

69.6 67.8

64.7 60.0

68.5 69.0
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
78 169
364
784
Ldn:
80 172
371
800
CNEL:
84 181
390
841
CNEL:
86 185
398
858
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Coast Highway
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: Westof Macarthur

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 45,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
4,530 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tracks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer,
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Bem1 Allen
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY
Scenario: Year 2016 With Project

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Coast Highway
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: Eastof Macarthur

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
61,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
6,180 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tracks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtfim Bem1 Allen
Autos:

68.46 4.61
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 5.96
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -12.63
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -11.28
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -16.58
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -15.24
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

67.8 65.9

64.1 58.0

66.7 67.3
Autos.,

69.1 67.2

65.4 59.4

68.0 68.6
Medium Trucks:

61.5 60.0

53.6 52.1

60.6 60.8
Medium Trucks:

62.9 61.4

55.0 53.4

61.9 62.1
Heavy Trucks.

62.4 60.9

51.9 53.1

61.5 61.6
Heavy Trucks.

63.7 62.3

53.2 54.5

62.8 63.0
Vehicle Noise:

69.6 67.8

64.7 60.0

68.6 69.0
Vehicle Noise:

70.9 69.2

66.0 61.4

69.9 70.4
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
80 173
372
802
Ldn:
99 213
458
987
CNEL:
86 185
399
860
CNEL:
106
228
491
1,058
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

6.1-73
Tuesday, May 29, 2012

No
01-1 Initial Study and General Plan Program EIR Addendum No. 2 Technical Appendix D
North Newport Center San Joaquin Plaza TPO Traffic Analysis Stantec Consulting Services, Inc.

May 2012
NNCPC Development Plan Amendment and Related Actions June 2012 Lead Agency: City of Newport Beach

0 Stantec
North Newport Center
San Joaquin Plaza TPO
Traffic Analysis
May 2012
Prepared For:

City of Newport Beach
2073006780

North Newport Center San Joaquin Plaza TPO
Cathy Lawrence, PE
Joe Foust, PE
Traffic Analysis
City of Newport Beach
May 16, 2012
Prepared for:

City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Submitted by:

Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
19 Technology Drive, Suite 200
Irvine, CA 92618
Prepared by:

QRDFI=5S�O1�`
rT
16 ►�� n
No.TRoO1635
Transportation Engineer Up. �2-
Stantec ConsultingServices Inc. T rRAFF\
C �
�T£ OF C .

Reviewed by:

PrVt'e1c"
al, Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
St Consulting Services Inc.

Stantec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1

2.0 TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE ANALYSIS....................................................................1

3.0 CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS ANALYSIS.............................................................................6

4.0 GENERAL PLAN ANALYSIS.............................................................................................17

5.0 CONCLUSION.....................................................................................................................17 City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Sya ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table of Contents
List of Figures
Figure 1 San Joaquin Plaza Project Description..................................................................... 2 Figure 2 TPO Analysis Study Intersections............................................................................ 3 Figure 3 General Project Trip Distribution and Project ADT..................................................... 8 Figure 4 AM Peak Hour Project -Generated Trips................................................................... 9 Figure 5 PM Peak Hour Project -Generated Trips.................................................................. 10 Figure 6 Peak Hour Project -Generated Trips....................................................................... 11 List of Tables
Table 1 Existing ICU Summary ............................................................................................4 Table 2 Approved Projects Summary ................................................................................... 5 Table 3 Trip Generation Summary ....................................................................................... 7 Table 4 Existing -Plus -Project ICU Summary.......................................................................... 12 Table 5 One Percent Traffic Analysis Summary................................................................... 13 Table 6 Year 2016 ICU Summary..................................................................................... 15 Table 7 Cumulative Projects Summary................................................................................ 16 Table 8 Cumulative ICU Summary ..................................................................................... 18 Appendices
Appendix A: ICU Analysis Calculations
Appendix B: One Percent Analysis Worksheets
City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpi_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx S}a ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

1.0 Introduction
This report summarizes an analysis performed for the proposed development of 524 residential units in the San Joaquin Plaza area of North Newport Center in the City of Newport Beach. A portion of the units (430 dwelling units) is currently entitled on the proposed site, a portion (79 units) is a conversion from unbuilt hotel rooms on a site within Newport Center to dwelling units, and the remainder (15 units) is unbuilt within Newport Center area (project location shown in Figure 1). The units which are not currently entitled on the site (94 units) are being analyzed in this report based on the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) methodology. In addition, this report summarizes the results of an analysis of cumulative conditions in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements.

2.0 Traffic Phasing Ordinance Analysis
The City of Newport Beach identified 20 intersections for analysis to determine the impact of the proposed residential project. These intersections are illustrated in Figure 2.

Existing peak hour intersection volumes for the study locations were counted in March 2012 by Traffic Data Services, Inc., consistent with the TPO requirements. Existing intersection levels of service are based on intersection capacity utilization (ICU) values. The ICU values are a means of presenting the volume to capacity ratios, with a V/C ratio of .90 representing the upper threshold for an acceptable level of service (LOS D) in the City of Newport Beach. Existing lane configurations were assumed, and a capacity of 1,600 vph per lane with no clearance factor was utilized. The City methodology calculates the ICU value to three decimal places, and then reports the resulting ICU value rounded to two decimal places.

Existing ICU values for the study intersections assuming existing lane configurations are summarized in Table 1 (actual ICU calculation sheets are included in Appendix A). As this table shows, the study intersections are currently operating at LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours.

An ambient growth rate of 1.0 percent per year was added to the existing volumes along Jamboree Road, MacArthur Boulevard, and Coast Highway. The project is assumed to be complete in 2015; therefore, the study year is 2016 consistent with the TPO guidelines. Traffic generated by approved projects in the study area (including the entitled 430 DU in San Joaquin Plaza), obtained from City Staff, were added to the existing -plus -growth peak hour volumes to obtain year 2016 background peak hour volumes for the intersections prior to the addition of project -generated traffic. Table 2 summarizes the approved projects included in this analysis.

City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpi_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Sya ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 1 Existing ICU Summary
Intersection

1. Jamboree & Ford/Eastbluff
Existing
AM PM
.74/C .61/B

2. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills
.60/A
.70/13

3. Jamboree & Santa Barbara
.44/A
.57/A

4. Jamboree & Coast H
.56/A
.65/13

5. Newport Center & Coast Hwy
.36/A
.44/A

6. Avocado & Coast H
.44/A
.50/A

7. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Canyon
.73/C
.82/D

8. MacArthur & San Joaquin Hills
.65/13
.80/C

9. MacArthur & San Miguel
.53/A
.44/A

10. MacArthur & Coast H
.66/13
.64/13

11. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin Hills
.26/A
.36/A

12. Santa Cruz & San Clemente
.14/A
.25/A

13. Santa Cruz & Newport Center
.15/A
.31/A

14. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin Hills
.29/A
.49/A

15. Newport Center & Santa Rosa
.12/A
.34/A

16. Newport Center & San Miguel
.14/A
.32/A

17. Avocado & San Miguel
.31/A
.49/A

18. Newport Center & Newport Center
.18/A
.36/A

19. Santa Barbara & San Clemente
.27/A
.33/A

20. Newport Center & Santa Barbara
.12/A
.21/A
Level of service ranges: .00 - .60 A
.61 - .70 B
.71 - .80 C
.81 - .90 D
.91 - 1.00 E
Above 1.00 F
City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Sy' ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 2 Approved Projects Summary
Project
Island Expansion
Percent Complete
40 Temple Bat Yahm Expansion
65 CIOSA — Irvine Project
91 Newport Dunes
0 Hoag Hospital Phase III
0 St. Mark Presbyterian Church
77 OLQA Church Expansion
0 2300 Newport Blvd
0 Newport Executive Court
0 Hoag Health Center
75 North Newport Center
0 Santa Barbara Condo
0 Newport Beach City Hall
0 328 Old Newport Medical Office
0 Coastline Community College
0 Ba view Medical Office
0 Mariner's Pointe
0 4221 Dolphin Striker
0 City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Sy' ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Trip rates and the resulting trip generation for the proposed project are summarized in Table 3.

These trips were distributed to the surrounding circulation system according to the general distribution shown in Figure 3. Figures 4 through 6 illustrate the peak hour project -generated trips at the study intersections. Existing -plus -project peak hour volumes were obtained by adding the project -generated peak hour trips to the existing peak hour volumes. The ICU values for existing - plus -project conditions are summarized in Table 4. Similarly, background -plus -project peak hour volumes were obtained by adding the project -generated peak hour trips to the 2016 background peak hour volumes presented above.

The TPO analysis consists of a one percent analysis and an ICU analysis at each study intersection. The one percent analysis compares the proposed project traffic with projected background peak hour volumes. To pass the one percent analysis, peak hour traffic from the proposed project must be less than one percent of the projected background peak hour traffic on each leg of the intersection. If the proposed project passes the one percent analysis, then the ICU analysis is not required for that intersection and no further analysis is necessary. If the proposed project does not pass the one percent analysis, then the ICU analysis must be performed for each intersection which fails to pass the one percent test.

Table 5 summarizes the results of the one percent analysis for the proposed project (the one percent analysis sheets are included in Appendix B). As this table indicates, the proposed project does not pass the one percent analysis at 12 study intersections during the AM or PM peak hour; therefore, an ICU analysis is required for these 12 intersections.

An ICU analysis was performed for the 12 intersections which did not pass the one percent test.

Table 6 summarizes the existing, 2016 background, and 2016 background -plus -project ICU values during the AM and PM peak hours (actual ICU calculation sheets are included in Appendix A).

As the ICU summary table indicates, each of the intersections will operate at LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours. The project has no significant impact on the study intersections, and no mitigation is required.

3.0 Cumulative Conditions Analysis
City Staff provided a list of six known but not approved projects for use in a cumulative conditions analysis. These cumulative projects are summarized in Table 7. Trip generation and distribution for each cumulative project was also provided by City Staff. The peak hour cumulative intersection volumes were added to the 2016 background peak hour volumes presented earlier, and the project peak hour trips were added to the resulting 2016 background -plus -cumulative City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx S}a ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 3 Trip Generation Summary
r
ITE 232
DU .06 .28 .34 .24 .14 .38 4.18
Trip Generation
Residential
94 DU 6 26 32 23 13 36 393
Source: Trip Generation 8n
Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers
City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Sy' ntec

10 11

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 4 Existing -Plus -Project ICU Summary
ExistingExisting ProjectIntersection AM PM AM PM

1. Jamboree & Ford/Eastbluff .74/C .61/13 .74/C .61/B
Project
AM PM
.00 .00

2. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills
.60/A
.70/13
.60/A
.70/13
.00
.00

3. Jamboree & Santa Barbara
.44/A
.57/A
.44/A
.57/A
.00
.00

4. Jamboree & Coast Hwy
.56/A
.65/13
.56/A
.65/13
.00
.00

5. Newport Center & Coast Hwy
.36/A
.44/A
.37/A
.45/A
.01
.01

6. Avocado & Coast Hwy
.44/A
.50/A
.44/A
.50/A
.00
.00

7. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Canyon
.73/C
.82/D
.73/C
.82/D
.00
.00

8. MacArthur & San Joaquin Hills
.65/13
.80/C
.65/13
.80/C
.00
.00

9. MacArthur & San Miguel
.53/A
.44/A
.53/A
.44/A
.00
.00

10. MacArthur & Coast Hwy
.66/13
.64/13
.66/13
.64/13
.00
.00

11. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin Hills
.26/A
.36/A
.27/A
.37/A
.01
.01

12. Santa Cruz & San Clemente
.14/A
.25/A
.14/A
.26/A
.00
.01

13. Santa Cruz & Newport Center
.15/A
.31/A
.15/A
.31/A
.00
.00

14. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin Hills
.29/A
.49/A
.29/A
.50/A
.00
.01

15. Newport Center & Santa Rosa
.12/A
.34/A
.12/A
.34/A
.00
.00

16. Newport Center & San Miguel
.14/A
.32/A
.14/A
.32/A
.00
.00

17. Avocado & San Miguel
.31/A
.49/A
.31/A
.49/A
.00
.00

18. Newport Center & Newport Center
.18/A
.36/A
.18/A
.36/A
.00
.00

19. Santa Barbara & San Clemente
.27/A
.33/A
.27/A
.33/A
.00
.00

20. Newport Center & Santa Barbara
.12/A
.21/A
.12/A
.21/A
.00
.00
Level of service ranges: .00- .60 A
.61 - .70 B
.71 - .80 C
.81 - .90 D
.91 - 1.00 E
Above 1.00 F
City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Sy' ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 5 One Percent Traffic Analysis Summary
Less Than 1 r
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Of Projected 2016
-ak Hour Volumes?

1. Jamboree & Ford/Eastbluff
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
1,892
2,207
865
697
2,766
1,891
614
386
Project Peak Hour Trips
10 2
0 1
5 7
0 2
Yes

2. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
1,406
2,549
395
199
1,644
2,250
143
912
Project Peak Hour Trips
8 2
0 3
6 9
0 1
No

3. Jamboree & Santa Barbara
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
1,528
1,819
60 181
1,481
1,687
81 726
Project Peak Hour Trips
2 0
0 14
6 1
0 7
No

4. Jamboree & Coast Hwy
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
465
1,243
2,596
1,194
432
1,599
2,623
2,284
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 7
1 1
0 3
4 2
Yes

5. Newport Ctr & Coast Hwy
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
0 113
2,188
1,292
0 849
1,704
1,690
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 2
2 2
0 1
1 3
No

6. Avocado & Coast Hwy
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
361
191
1,374
1,455
295
603
1,456
1,548
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 0
4 2
0 0
2 3
Yes

7. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita C n
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
2,133
3,156
415
2,080
2,773
3,744
425
1,165
Project Peak Hour Trips
4 1
2 0
2 5
2 1
Yes

8. MacArthur & San Joaquin Hills
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
1,493
3,203
509
1,071
1,613
2,811
1,172
728
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 1
5 0
0 4
3 1
No

9. MacArthur & San Miguel
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
1,554
1,536
330
470
1,125
1,513
1,225
455
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
Yes

10. MacArthur & Coast Hwy
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
0 1,092
1,653
2,092
0 1,359
1,680
2,028
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 1
4 2
0 0
2 4
Yes
Continued
City of Newport Beach
CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpi_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx StanW

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 5 One Percent Traffic Analysis Summary (Continued) Less Than 1 r
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Of Projected 2016
-ak Hour Volumes?

11. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin Hills
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
118
82 932
399
781
39 783
584
Project Peak Hour Trips
4 0
5 1
2 0
7 5
No

12. Santa Cruz & San Clemente
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
144
360
95 35
577
315
336
102
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 3
5 0
2 6
3 0
No

13. Santa Cruz & Newport Ctr
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
60 269
140
178
254
255
280
317
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 3
0 0
1 0
0 1
No

14. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin Hills
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
169
132
583
1,015
797
143
789
767
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 0
5 1
0 0
3 5
Yes

15. Newport Ctr & Santa Rosa
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
204
107
84 400
509
320
270
508
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
No

16. Newport Ctr & San Miguel
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
255
106
39 288
423
298
347
609
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 1
No

17. Avocado & San Miguel
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
381
120
218
1,212
720
321
734
893
Project Peak Hour Trips
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
Yes

18. Newport Ctr & Newport Ctr
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
461
24 128
191
428
192
361
472
Project Peak Hour Trips
1 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
No

19. Santa Barbara & San Clemente
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
100
724
0 65
404
278
0 406
Project Peak Hour Trips
1 0
0 6
1 2
0 4
No

20. Newport Ctr & Santa Barbara
2016 Projected Peak Hour Volume
256
146
204
40 281
334
280
148
Project Peak Hour Trips
1 1
1 0
1 0
1 0
No
Note:
2016 Projected peak hour volume consists of existing volume, regional growth, and approved projects volume.

City of Newport Beach
CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpi_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Rantec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 6 Year 2016 ICU Summary
Intersection

2. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills
+ Approved
AM
.65/13
+ Growth I
I
PM
.80/C
Existing + Growth +
Approved + Project
AM PM
.65/13 .80/C
ProjectExisting
Increase
AM T7P -M
.00
.00

3. Jamboree & Santa Barbara
.48/A
.61/B
.48/A
.61/B
.00
.00

5. Newport Center & Coast Hwy
.39/A
.48/A
.39/A
.49/A
.00
.01

8. MacArthur & San Joaquin Hills
.69/13
.86/D
.69/13
.87/D
.00
.01

11. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin Hills
.29/A
.38/A
.30/A
.38/A
.01
.00

12. Santa Cruz & San Clemente
.14/A
.26/A
.14/A
.26/A
.00
.00

13. Santa Cruz & Newport Center
.15/A
.31/A
.15/A
.31/A
.00
.00

15. Newport Center & Santa Rosa
.15/A
.40/A
.15/A
.40/A
.00
.00

16. Newport Center & San Miguel
.15/A
.34/A
.15/A
.34/A
.00
.00

18. Newport Center & Newport Center
.18/A
.38/A
.18/A
.38/A
.00
.00

19. Santa Barbara & San Clemente
.28/A
.33/A
.28/A
.33/A
.00
.00

20. Newport Center & Santa Barbara
.13/A
.22/A
.13/A
.22/A
.00
.00
Level of service ranges: .00- .60 A
.61 - .70 B
.71 - .80 C
.81 - .90 D
.91 - 1.00 E
Above 1.00 F
City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Sy' ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 7 Cumulative Projects Summary
Project �Land Use Amount
Medical Arts Medical Office 12.25 TSF
Banning Ranch
Single Family Detached
423 DU
Condominium/Townhouse
952 DU
Retail

75.00 TSF
Hotel
75 Rm
Sunset Ridge Park
Park

13.67 Acre
Marina Park
Marina/Park

10.45 Acre
Koll-Conexant
Apartment
974 DU
Newport Coast TAZ 1 — 4
Single Family Detached
954 DU
Condominium/Townhouse
389 DU
Multi-Familv Attached
175 DU
City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Sy' ntec m

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS peak hour volumes. The previous one percent analysis without cumulative volumes represents the worst -case one percent analysis since the addition of cumulative traffic to the background volumes increases the chances of a project passing the one percent analysis. If an intersection passes the one percent analysis prior to the addition of cumulative traffic, then the intersection will pass the one percent analysis with the addition of cumulative traffic and no further analysis is required at that location.

The results of the cumulative ICU analysis are summarized in Table 8 (actual ICU calculation sheets are included in Appendix A). As the cumulative ICU table indicates, the proposed project will have no significant impact on the study intersections, each of which will operate at LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours, and no mitigation is required.

4.0 General Plan Analysis
The TPO analysis evaluates a project's potential short-term impacts. The project's consistency with the General Plan was also evaluated. San Joaquin Plaza has 430 DU currently entitled on the project site. Newport Center has 79 hotel rooms and 15 DU that are currently unbuilt but are identified in the General Plan. The proposed project consists of converting the 79 hotel rooms to 79 dwelling units, and developing 94 DU (79 DU + 15 DU) not currently entitled in San Joaquin Plaza. The peak hour and daily trips generated by 79 DU are less than the trips generated by 79 hotel rooms; therefore, the impact of residential units in Newport Center is less than the impact of an equivalent amount of hotel rooms. The proposed project will have less impact than the uses identified in the General Plan; hence the project is consistent with the General Plan.

5.0 Conclusion
The proposed 94 DU will generate 32 AM peak hour trips, 36 PM peak hour trips, and 393 daily trips. The marginal impact of project traffic on the street system was determined at 20 intersections in the vicinity. Of the 20 intersections, 12 did not pass the City's one percent analysis; however, the project had no marginal impact on the ICU values at these 12 intersections, which will continue to operate at LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours under 2016 conditions. Consequently, the proposed project has no significant impact on the study intersections, and no additional intersection improvements are required.

The impact of traffic from known but not approved projects was included in a cumulative conditions analysis. Under cumulative conditions, the project had no marginal impact during the City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx S}a ntec m

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Table 8 Cumulative ICU Summary
Existing + GrowthExisting
Approved
Intersection

1. Jamboree & Ford/Eastbluff .82/D .70/13
+ Growth
Approved
+ Cumulative Project
Project+ -
.82/D .70/13 .00 .00

2. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills
.68/13
.83/D
.68/13
.83/D
.00
.00

3. Jamboree & Santa Barbara
.50/A
.63/13
.51/A
.63/13
.01
.00

4. Jamboree & Coast Hwy
.66/13
.83/D
.67/13
.83/D
.01
.00

5. Newport Center & Coast Hwy
.42/A
.53/A
.42/A
.53/A
.00
.00

6. Avocado & Coast Hwy
.56/A
.59/A
.56/A
.59/A
.00
.00

7. MacArthur & Ford/Bonita Canyon
.78/C
.89/D
.78/C
.89/D
.00
.00

8. MacArthur & San Joaquin Hills
.71/C
.89/D
.71/C
.89/D
.00
.00

9. MacArthur & San Miguel
.60/A
.50/A
.60/A
.50/A
.00
.00

10. MacArthur & Coast Hwy
.78/C
.75/C
.78/C
.75/C
.00
.00

11. Santa Cruz & San Joaquin Hills
.29/A
.38/A
.30/A
.39/A
.01
.01

12. Santa Cruz & San Clemente
.15/A
.26/A
.15/A
.26/A
.00
.00

13. Santa Cruz & Newport Center
.16/A
.32/A
.16/A
.32/A
.00
.00

14. Santa Rosa & San Joaquin Hills
.35/A
.54/A
.35/A
.54/A
.00
.00

15. Newport Center & Santa Rosa
.16/A
.40/A
.16/A
.40/A
.00
.00

16. Newport Center & San Miguel
.16/A
.35/A
.16/A
.35/A
.00
.00

17. Avocado & San Miguel
.34/A
.55/A
.34/A
.55/A
.00
.00

18. Newport Center & Newport Center
.19/A
.38/A
.19/A
.39/A
.00
.01

19. Santa Barbara & San Clemente
.28/A
.33/A
.28/A
.33/A
.00
.00

20. Newport Center & Santa Barbara
.13/A
.23/A
.13/A
.23/A
.00
.00
Level of service ranges: .00 - .60 A
.61 - .70 B
.71 - .80 C
.81 - .90 D
.91 - 1.00 E
Above 1.00 F
City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Sy' ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS AM or PM peak hour on the ICU values at all of the study intersections. Therefore the proposed project has no significant impact on the study intersections under cumulative conditions, and no intersection mitigation measures are required.

The proposed project will generate less peak hour and daily traffic than the land uses identified in the General Plan; therefore the project is consistent with the General Plan.

City of Newport Beach CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx S}a ntec

NORTH NEWPORT CENTER SAN JOAQUIN PLAZA TPO TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

APPENDIX A
ICU Worksheets
City of Newport Beach
CAL v:\2073\active\2073006780\san_joaquin_plaza_tpo\report\rpt_sanjoaquinplaza_tpo_051612.docx Stantec m

1. Jamboree & Ford/Eastbluff
Existing

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3200 419 .131* 328 .103
NBT 3 4800 1196 .269 1817 .444*
NBR 0 0 93 314
SBL 1 1600 73 .046 31 .019*
SBT 3 4800 1730 .360* 1570 .327
SBR 1 1600 143 .089 75 .047
EBL 1.5 182 103 .064
EBT 1.5 4800 284 .097* 234 .073*
EBR f 390 272
WBL 1.5 160 .100 164
WBT 1.5 4800 485 .152* 189 .074*
WBR 1 1600 40 .025 27 . M
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
Existing + Project
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2 3200
419
.131*
328
.103
NBT
3 4800
1204
.271
1821
.445*
NBR
0 0
95 315
SBL
1 1600
73 .046
31 .019*
SBT
3 4800
1732
.361*
1577
.329
SBR
1 1600
143
.089
75 .047
EBL

1.5 182
103
.064
EBT

1.5 4800
284
.097*
234
.073*
EBR
f
390
272
WBL

1.5 161
.101
166
WBT

1.5 4800
485
.152*
189
.074*
WBR
1 1600
40 .025
27 .017
Note:

Assumes
E/W Split
Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .740 .610 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .741 .611 Existing + Growth + Approved

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3200 439 .137* 346 .108
NBT 3 4800 1354 .303 2089 .504*
NBR 0 0 100 332
SBL 1 1600 76 .048 33 .021*
SBT 3 4800 1981 .413* 1780 .371
SBR 1 1600 150 .094 78 .049
EBL 1.5 183 103 .064
EBT 1.5 4800 289 .098* 234 .073*
EBR f 393 277
WBL 1.5 161 .101 170
WBT 1.5 4800 495 .155* 189 .070*
WBR 1 1600 41 .026 27 .017
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
Existing + Growth + Approved +
Project
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2 3200
439
.137*
346
.108
NBT
3 4800
1362
.305
2093
.505*
NBR
0 0
102
333
SBL
1 1600
76 .048
33 .021*
SBT
3 4800
1983
.413*
1787
.372
SBR
1 1600
150
.094
78 .049
EBL

1.5 183
103
.064
EBT

1.5 4800
289
.098*
234
.073*
EBR
f
393
277
WBL

1.5 162
.101
172
WBT

1.5 4800
495
.155*
189
.075*
WBR
1 1600
41 .026
27 .017
Note:

Assumes
E/W Split
Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .803 .673 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .803 .674 Stantec A-2

1. Jamboree & Ford/Eastbluff
Existing + Growth + Approved + Cumulative

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 2 3200 448 .140* 351 .110
NBT 3 4800 1515 .336 2170 .521*
NBR 0 0 100 332
SBL 1 1600 76 .048 33 .021*
SBT 3 4800 2020 .421* 1943 .405
SBR 1 1600 150 .094 78 .049
EBL 1.5 183 103 .064
EBT 1.5 4800 296 .100* 255 .080*
EBR f 395 286
WBL 1.5 161 .101 170
WBT 1.5 4800 516 .161* 203 .078*
WBR 1 1600 41 .026 27 . M
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
Existing + Growth + Approved + Cumulative + Project
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
2 3200
448
.140*
351
.110
NBT
3 4800
1523
.339
2174
.522*
NBR
0 0
102
333
SBL
1 1600
76 .048
33 .021*
SBT
3 4800
2022
.421*
1950
.406
SBR
1 1600
150
.094
78 .049
EBL

1.5 183
103
.064
EBT

1.5 4800
296
.100*
255
.080*
EBR
f
395
286
WBL

1.5 162
.101
172
WBT

1.5 4800
516
.161*
203
.078*
WBR
1 1600
41 .026
27 .017
Note:

Assumes
E/W Split
Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .822 .700 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .822 .701 Stantec A-3

2. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills
Existing

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 26 .016 55 .034
NBT 3 4800 1110 .231* 1289 .269*
NBR f 140 131
SBL 2 3200 744 .233* 514 .161*
SBT 3 4800 1450 .302 1330 .277
SBR f 78 164
EBL 1.5 299 .093* 89 .028*
EBT 1.5 4800 38 .024 36 .023
EBR f 58 13
WBL 1.5 123 .038* 178 .056*
WBT 1.5 4800 8 .005 46 .029
WBR 1 1600 17 .011 572 .358
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .181*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
Existing + Project

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 26 .016 55 .034
NBT 3 4800 1117 .233* 1293 .269*
NBR f 141 133
SBL 2 3200 746 .233* 522 .163*
SBT 3 4800 1450 .302 1331 .277
SBR f 78 164
EBL 1.5 299 .093* 89 .028*
EBT 1.5 4800 38 .024 36 .023
EBR f 58 13
WBL 1.5 123 .038* 178 .056*
WBT 1.5 4800 8 .005 46 .029
WBR 1 1600 20 .013 573 .358
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .180*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .595 .695 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .597 .696 Existing + Growth + Approved

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 27 .017 58 .036
NBT 3 4800 1229 .256* 1442 .300*
NBR f 150 144
SBL 2 3200 819 .256* 581 .182*
SBT 3 4800 1649 .344 1499 .312
SBR f 81 171
EBL 1.5 299 .093* 90 .028*
EBT 1.5 4800 38 .024 40 .025
EBR f 58 13
WBL 1.5 133 .042* 186 .058*
WBT 1.5 4800 8 .005 46 .029
WBR 1 1600 58 .036 680 .425
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .230*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
Existing + Growth + Approved + Project

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 27 .017 58 .036
NBT 3 4800 1236 .258* 1446 .301*
NBR f 151 146
SBL 2 3200 821 .257* 589 .184*
SBT 3 4800 1649 .344 1500 .313
SBR f 81 171
EBL 1.5 299 .093* 90 .028*
EBT 1.5 4800 38 .024 40 .025
EBR f 58 13
WBL 1.5 133 .042* 186 .058*
WBT 1.5 4800 8 .005 46 .029
WBR 1 1600 61 .038 681 .426
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .230*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .647 .798 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .650 .801 Stantec A-4

2. Jamboree & San Joaquin Hills
Existing + Growth + Approved + Cumulative

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 27 .017 58 .036
NBT 3 4800 1365 .284* 1544 .322*
NBR f 150 144
SBL 2 3200 836 .261* 581 .182*
SBT 3 4800 1707 .356 1639 .341
SBR f 81 171
EBL 1.5 299 .093* 90 .028*
EBT 1.5 4800 38 .024 40 .025
EBR f 58 13
WBL 1.5 133 .042* 186 .058*
WBT 1.5 4800 8 .005 46 .029
WBR 1 1600 58 .036 696 .435
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .240*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
Existing + Growth + Approved + Cumulative + Project

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 27 .017 58 .036
NBT 3 4800 1372 .286* 1548 .323*
NBR f 151 146
SBL 2 3200 838 .262* 589 .184*
SBT 3 4800 1707 .356 1640 .342
SBR f 81 171
EBL 1.5 299 .093* 90 .028*
EBT 1.5 4800 38 .024 40 .025
EBR f 58 13
WBL 1.5 133 .042* 186 .058*
WBT 1.5 4800 8 .005 46 .029
WBR 1 1600 61 .038 697 .436
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .240*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .680 .830 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .683 .833 Stantec A-5

3. Jamboree & Santa Barbara
Existing

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 10 .006 17 .011
NBT 3 4800 1115 .232* 1176 .245*
NBR 1 1600 289 .181 128 .080
SBL 2 3200 543 .170* 157 .049*
SBT 3 4800 1067 .222 1297 .270
SBR 1 1600 29 .018 74 .046
EBL 1 1600 33 .021* 45 .028*
EBT 1 1600 5 .003 17 .011
EBR 1 1600 16 .010 16 .010
WBL 1.5 39 243
WBT 0.5 3200 6 .014* 5 .078*
WBR 1 1600 99 .062 458 .286
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .171*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
Existing + Project

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 10 .006 17 .011
NBT 3 4800 1116 .233* 1178 .245*
NBR 1 1600 290 .181 132 .083
SBL 2 3200 543 .170* 158 .049*
SBT 3 4800 1067 .222 1297 .270
SBR 1 1600 29 .018 74 .046
EBL 1 1600 33 .021* 45 .028*
EBT 1 1600 5 .003 17 .011
EBR 1 1600 16 .010 16 .010
WBL 1.5 46 246
WBT 0.5 3200 6 .016* 5 .078*
WBR 1 1600 106 .066 462 .289
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .174*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .437 .571 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .440 .574 Existing + Growth + Approved
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1 1600
10 .006
18 .011
NBT
3 4800
1214
.253*
1319
.275*
NBR
1 1600
304
.190
144
.090
SBL
2 3200
570
.178*
178
.056*
SBT
3 4800
1218
.254
1426
.297
SBR
1 1600
31 .019
83 .052
EBL
1 1600
39 .024*
47 .029*
EBT
1 1600
5 .003
18 .011
EBR
1 1600
16 .010
16 .010
WBL

1.5 60
253
WBT

0.5 3200
6 .021*
6 .081*
WBR
1 1600
115
.072
467
.292
Right
Turn Adjustment
WBR
.169*
Note:

Assumes
E/W Split
Phasing
Existing + Growth + Approved + Project

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 10 .006 18 .011
NBT 3 4800 1215 .253* 1321 .275*
NBR 1 1600 305 .191 148 .093
SBL 2 3200 570 .178* 179 .056*
SBT 3 4800 1218 .254 1426 .297
SBR 1 1600 31 .019 83 .052
EBL 1 1600 39 .024* 47 .029*
EBT 1 1600 5 .003 18 .011
EBR 1 1600 16 .010 16 .010
WBL 1.5 67 256
WBT 0.5 3200 6 .023* 6 .082*
WBR 1 1600 122 .076 471 .294
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .170*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .476 .610 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .478 .612 Stantec A-6

3. Jamboree & Santa Barbara
Existing + Growth + Approved + Cumulative

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 10 .006 18 .011
NBT 3 4800 1350 .281* 1421 .296*
NBR 1 1600 304 .190 144 .090
SBL 2 3200 570 . M* 178 .056*
SBT 3 4800 1276 .266 1566 .326
SBR 1 1600 31 .019 83 .052
EBL 1 1600 39 .024* 47 .029*
EBT 1 1600 5 .003 18 .011
EBR 1 1600 16 .010 16 .010
WBL 1.5 60 253
WBT 0.5 3200 6 .021* 6 .081*
WBR 1 1600 115 .072 467 .292
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .169*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
Existing + Growth + Approved + Cumulative + Project

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL 1 1600 10 .006 18 .011
NBT 3 4800 1351 .281* 1423 .296*
NBR 1 1600 305 .191 148 .093
SBL 2 3200 570 . M* 179 .056*
SBT 3 4800 1276 .266 1566 .326
SBR 1 1600 31 .019 83 .052
EBL 1 1600 39 .024* 47 .029*
EBT 1 1600 5 .003 18 .011
EBR 1 1600 16 .010 16 .010
WBL 1.5 67 256
WBT 0.5 3200 6 .023* 6 .082*
WBR 1 1600 122 .076 471 .294
Right Turn Adjustment WBR .170*
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .504 .631 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .506 .633 Stantec A-7

4. Jamboree & Coast Hwy
Existing
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1 1600
17 .011
41 .026
NBT
2 3200
340
.134*
290
.115*
NBR
0 0
88 79
SBL
1 1600
192
.120*
179
.112*
SBT
2 3200
291
.091
417
.130
SBR
f
594
856
EBL
3 4800
788
.164*
723
.151*
EBT
4 6400
1557
.246
1589
.258
EBR
0 0
19 60
WBL
2 3200
76 .024
132
.041
WBT
4 6400
921
.144*
1729
.270*
WBR
f
102
205
Existing + Project
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1 1600
17 .011
41 .026
NBT
2 3200
340
.134*
290
.115*
NBR
0 0
88 79
SBL
1 1600
194
.121*
180
.113*
SBT
2 3200
291
.091
417
.130
SBR
f
599
858
EBL
3 4800
789
.164*
727
.151*
EBT
4 6400
1557
.246
1589
.258
EBR
0 0
19 60
WBL
2 3200
76 .024
132
.041
WBT
4 6400
921
.144*
1729
.270*
WBR
f
103
207
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .562 .648 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .563 .649 Existing + Growth + Approved
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1 1600
18 .011
44 .028
NBT
2 3200
355
.140*
303
.122*
NBR
0 0
93 86
SBL
1 1600
206
.129*
194
.121*
SBT
2 3200
304
.095
437
.137
SBR
f
734
968
EBL
3 4800
872
.182*
846
.176*
EBT
4 6400
1703
.269
1715
.278
EBR
0 0
21 62
WBL
2 3200
80 .025
142
.044
WBT
4 6400
1007
.157*
1918
.300*
WBR
f
107
223
Existing + Growth + Approved +
Project
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1 1600
18 .011
44 .028
NBT
2 3200
355
.140*
303
.122*
NBR
0 0
93 86
SBL
1 1600
208
.130*
195
.122*
SBT
2 3200
304
.095
437
.137
SBR
f
739
970
EBL
3 4800
873
.182*
850
.177*
EBT
4 6400
1703
.269
1715
.278
EBR
0 0
21 62
WBL
2 3200
80 .025
142
.044
WBT
4 6400
1007
.157*
1918
.300*
WBR
f
108
225
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .608 .719 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .609 .721 Stantec A-8

4. Jamboree & Coast Hwy
Existing + Growth + Approved +
Cumulative
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1 1600
18 .011
44 .028
NBT
2 3200
355
.140*
303
.122*
NBR
0 0
93 86
SBL
1 1600
243
.152*
323
.202*
SBT
2 3200
304
.095
437
.137
SBR
f
755
979
EBL
3 4800
878
.183*
871
.181*
EBT
4 6400
1784
.282
1933
.312
EBR
0 0
21 62
WBL
2 3200
80 .025
142
.044
WBT
4 6400
1210
.189*
2072
.324*
WBR
f
237
300
Existing + Growth + Approved +
Cumulative + Project
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
1 1600
18 .011
44 .028
NBT
2 3200
355
.140*
303
.122*
NBR
0 0
93 86
SBL
1 1600
245
.153*
324
.203*
SBT
2 3200
304
.095
437
.137
SBR
f
760
981
EBL
3 4800
879
.183*
875
.182*
EBT
4 6400
1784
.282
1933
.312
EBR
0 0
21 62
WBL
2 3200
80 .025
142
.044
WBT
4 6400
1210
.189*
2072
.324*
WBR
f
238
302
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .664 .829 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .665 .831 Stantec A-9

5. Newport Center & Coast Hwy
Existing
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
0 0
0 0
NBT
0 0
0 0
NBR
0 0
0 0
SBL
2 3200
19 .006*
164
.051*
SBT
0 0
0 0
SBR
f
69 635
EBL
2 3200
315
.098
314
.098*
EBT
3 4800
1718
.358*
1268
.264
EBR
0 0
0 0
WBL 0 0 0 0
WBT 3 4800 1051 .219 1416 .295*
WBR f 170 128
Existing + Project

AM PK HOUR

PM PK HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY

VOL V/C

VOL V/C
NBL
0 0
0 0
NBT
0 0
0 0
NBR
0 0
0 0
SBL
2 3200
21 .007*
165 .052*
SBT
0 0
0 0
SBR
f
69 635
EBL
2 3200
315
.098
314 .098*
EBT
3 4800
1720
.358*
1269 .264
EBR
0 0
0 0
WBL
0 0
1 {.0011*
0 WBT
3 4800
1052
.219
1418 .295*
WBR
f
170
129
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .364 .444 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .366 .445 Existing + Growth + Approved
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
0 0
0 0
NBT
0 0
0 0
NBR
0 0
0 0
SBL
2 3200
24 .008*
170
.053*
SBT
0 0
0 0
SBR
f
89 679
EBL
2 3200
343
.107
348
.109*
EBT
3 4800
1846
.385*
1357
.283
EBR
0 0
0 0
WBL
0 0
0 0
WBT
3 4800
1113
.232
1547
.322*
WBR
f
179
143
Existing + Growth + Approved +
Project

AM PK HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
0 0
0 0
NBT
0 0
0 0
NBR
0 0
0 0
SBL
2 3200
26 .008*
171
CJ-3*
SBT
0 0
0 0
SBR
f
89 679
EBL
2 3200
343
.107
348
.109*
EBT
3 4800
1848
.385*
1358
.283
EBR
0 0
0 0
WBL
0 0
1 1.0011*
0 WBT
3 4800
1114
.232
1549
.323*
WBR
f
179
144
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .393 .484 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .394 .485 Stantec A-10

5. Newport Center & Coast Hwy
Existing + Growth + Approved + Cumulative
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES

CAPACITY
VOL
V/C
VOL
V/C
NBL
0 0
0 0
NBT
0 0
0 0
NBR
0 0
0 0
SBL
2 3200
24 .008*
170
.053*
SBT
0 0
0 0
SBR
f
94 696
EBL
2 3200
356
.111*
359
.112*
EBT
3 4800
1951
.406
1693
.353
EBR
0 0
0 0
WBL
0 0
0 0
WBT
3 4800
1441
.300*
1761
.367*
WBR
f
179
143
Existing + Growth + Approved +
Cumulative + Project
AM PK
HOUR
PM PK
HOUR
LANES