Newport Beach City Council
April 9, 2024

69.5 92
199
428
923
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
27 Table 6-3 (1 of 3)
2016 Without Project Conditions Noise Contours
Road
Segment
CNEL at
100 Feet
(dBA)
Distance to Contour (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
55 dBA
CNEL
Jamboree
North of Eastbluff

69.6 95
204
439
946
Jamboree
Eastbluff to San Joaquin Hills

70.5 107
231
498
1,072
Jamboree
South of San Joaquin Hills

68.8 83
179
386
831
Jamboree
North of Santa Barbara

69.0 86
185
398
858
Jamboree
South of Santa Barbara

68.6 81
173
374
805
Jamboree
North of Coast Highway

68.3 77
167
359
1 773
Jamboree
South of Coast Highway

63.6 RW
80 173
372
Santa Cruz
North of San Joaquin Hills

54.5 RW
RW
RW
92 Santa Cruz
Souh of San Joaquin Hills

63.1 RW
75 162
349
Santa Cruz
North of San Clemente

63.1 RW
74 160
346
Santa Cruz
South of San Clemente

62.1 RW
64 139
299
Santa Cruz
North of Newport CTR

62.0 RW
RW
135
291
Santa Cruz
South of Newport CTR

58.8 RW
RW
83 179
Newport CTR
West of Newport CTR

61.1 RW
RW
118
255
Newport CTR
South of Santa Barbara

61.4 RW
RW
125
269
Newport CTR
North of Santa Barbara

60.8 RW
RW
114
245
Newport CTR
South of Santa Cruz

60.5 RW
RW
107
231
Newport CTR
North of Santa Cruz

60.1 RW
RW
101
219
Newport CTR
North of Santa Rosa

61.1 RW
RW
118
255
Newport CTR
South of Santa Rosa

62.5 RW
68 146
314
Newport CTR
North of San Miguel

61.3 RW
RW
121
262
Newport CTR
South of San Miguel

62.8 RW
72 154
333
Newport CTR
East of Newport CTR

62.0 RW
64 137
295
Newport CTR
South of Newport CTR (Circle

64.0 RW
86 184
397
Newport CTR
North of Coast Highway

64.6 RW
94 203
437
Santa Rosa
North of San Joaquin Hills

58.0 RW
RW
73 158
Santa Rosa
South of San Joaquin Hills

64.4 RW
92 197
425
Santa Rosa
North of Newport CTR

63.7 RW
82 177
382
Santa Rosa
South of Newport CTR

61.2 RW
RW
119
257
Avocado
North of San Miguel

57.8 RW
RW
71 153
Avocado
South of San Miguel

62.7 RW
70 151
326
Avocado
North of Coast Highway

61.2 RW
RW
120
259
Macarthur
North of Bonita Canyon

71.5 126
272
585
1,261
Macarthur
1South of Bonita Canyon
1 70.9
114
246
529
1,140
Macarthur
I North of San Joaquin Hills
1 70.8
113
243
1 524
1,129
North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM

Table 6-3 (2 of 3)
2016 Without Project Conditions Noise Contours
Road
Segment
CNEL at
100 Feet
(dBA)
Distance to Contour (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
1 65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
55 dBA
CNEL
Macarthur
South of San Joaquin Hills

68.8 84
180
388
836
Macarthur
North of San Miguel

68.3 78
167
1 360
776
Macarthur
South of San Miguel

67.6 69
148
319
688
Macarthur
North of Coast Highway

67.6 69
149
320
690
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
West of Jamboree

64.0 RW
86 186
400
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
East of Jamboree

63.0 RW
74 160
344
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
West of Bonita Canyon

62.4 RW
1 67
145
313
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
East of Bonita Canyon

68.1 75
162
348
750
San Joaquin Hills
West of Jamboree

59.4 RW
RW
92 198
San Joaquin Hills
East of Jamboree

65.5 RW
109
234
504
San Joaquin Hills
West of Santa Cruz

66.2 RW
120
259
559
San Joaquin Hills
East of Santa Cruz

64.2 RW
1 88
190
410
San Joaquin Hills
West of Santa Rosa

64.8 RW
97 209
451
San Joaquin Hills
East of Santa Rosa

66.0 RW
117
253
544
San Joaquin Hills
West of Macarthur

66.2 RW
120
258
555
San Joaquin Hills
East of Macarthur

65.7 RW
112
241
520
San Clemente
East of Santa Barbara

58.3 RW
RW
77 165
San Clemente
West of Santa Cruz

58.4 RW
RW
78 169
Santa Barbara
West of Jamboree

54.4 RW
RW
RW
91 Santa Barbara
East of Jamboree

61.9 RW
RW
133
287
Santa Barbara
North of San Clemente

61.8 RW
RW
132
284
Santa Barbara
South of San Clemente

59.8 RW
RW
96 208
Santa Barbara
West of Newport CTR

59.2 RW
RW
88 190
Santa Barbara
East of Newport CTR

56.5 RW
RW
RW
125
San Miguel
West of Newport CTR

61.8 RW
RW
131
283
San Miguel
East of Newport CTR

63.8 RW
83 178
384
San Miguel
West of Avacado

64.8 RW
96 208
447
San Miguel
East of Avacado

66.5 RW
125
270
581
San Miguel
West of Macarthur

66.2 RW
119
257
555
San Miguel
East of Macarthur

63.1 RW
75 162
349
Coast Highway
West of Jamboree

71.0 117
251
541
1,166
Coast Highway
East of Jamboree

70.1 102
219
472
1,018
Coast Highway
West of Newport CTR

69.8 1 97
209
450
968
North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
IWO

Table 6-3 (3 of 3)
2016 Without Project Conditions Noise Contours
Road
Segment
CNEL at
100 Feet
(dBA)
Distance to Contour (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
55 dBA
CNEL
Coast Highway
East of Newport CTR

69.0 86
185
399
859
Coast Highway
West of Avacado

68.9 84
181
390
1 841
Coast Highway
East of Avacado

69.0 86
185
398
857
Coast Highway
West of Macarthur

68.7 82
176
378
815
Coast Highway
East of Macarthur

70.4 106
228
491
1,057
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
30 Table 6-4 (1 of 3)
2016 With Project Conditions Noise Contours
Road
Segment
CNEL at
100 Feet
(dBA)
Distance to Contour (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
55 dBA
CNEL
Jamboree
North of Eastbluff

69.7 95
204
440
948
Jamboree
Eastbluff to San Joaquin Hills

70.5 107
231
499
1,074
Jamboree
South of San Joaquin Hills

68.8 83
179
386
832
Jamboree
North of Santa Barbara

69.0 86
185
399
859
Jamboree
South of Santa Barbara

68.6 81
174
374
806
Jamboree
North of Coast Highway

68.3 77
167
360
1 775
Jamboree
South of Coast Highway

63.6 RW
80 173
372
Santa Cruz
North of San Joaquin Hills

54.5 RW
RW
RW
92 Santa Cruz
Souh of San Joaquin Hills

63.2 RW
76 164
353
Santa Cruz
North of San Clemente

63.1 RW
75 161
347
Santa Cruz
South of San Clemente

62.2 RW
65 140
301
Santa Cruz
North of Newport CTR

62.0 RW
RW
135
291
Santa Cruz
South of Newport CTR

58.8 RW
RW
83 179
Newport CTR
West of Newport CTR

61.1 RW
RW
118
255
Newport CTR
South of Santa Barbara

61.4 RW
RW
125
269
Newport CTR
North of Santa Barbara

60.8 RW
RW
114
245
Newport CTR
South of Santa Cruz

60.5 RW
RW
107
231
Newport CTR
North of Santa Cruz

60.1 RW
RW
101
219
Newport CTR
North of Santa Rosa

61.1 RW
RW
118
255
Newport CTR
South of Santa Rosa

62.5 RW
68 146
314
Newport CTR
North of San Miguel

61.3 RW
RW
121
262
Newport CTR
South of San Miguel

62.8 RW
72 154
333
Newport CTR
East of Newport CTR

62.0 RW
64 137
295
Newport CTR
South of Newport CTR (Circle

64.0 RW
86 184
397
Newport CTR
North of Coast Highway

64.6 RW
94 203
437
Santa Rosa
North of San Joaquin Hills

58.0 RW
RW
73 158
Santa Rosa
South of San Joaquin Hills

64.4 RW
92 197
425
Santa Rosa
North of Newport CTR

63.7 RW
82 177
382
Santa Rosa
South of Newport CTR

61.2 RW
RW
119
257
Avocado
North of San Miguel

57.8 RW
RW
71 153
Avocado
South of San Miguel

62.7 RW
70 151
326
Avocado
North of Coast Highway

61.2 RW
RW
120
259
Macarthur
North of Bonita Canyon

71.5 126
272
586
1,262
Macarthur
1South of Bonita Canyon
1 70.9
114
246
530
1,141
Macarthur
I North of San Joaquin Hills
1 70.8
113
243
1 524
1,129
North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
31 Table 6-4 (2 of 3)
2016 With Project Conditions Noise Contours
Road
Segment
CNEL at
100 Feet
(dBA)
Distance to Contour (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
1 65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
55 dBA
CNEL
Macarthur
South of San Joaquin Hills

68.8 84
180
388
836
Macarthur
North of San Miguel

68.3 78
167
1 360
776
Macarthur
South of San Miguel

67.6 69
148
319
688
Macarthur
North of Coast Highway

67.6 69
149
320
690
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
West of Jamboree

64.0 RW
86 186
400
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
East of Jamboree

63.1 RW
74 160
346
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
West of Bonita Canyon

62.4 RW
1 67
145
313
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
East of Bonita Canyon

68.1 75
162
349
751
San Joaquin Hills
West of Jamboree

59.4 RW
RW
92 198
San Joaquin Hills
East of Jamboree

65.6 RW
109
235
505
San Joaquin Hills
West of Santa Cruz

66.2 RW
120
259
559
San Joaquin Hills
East of Santa Cruz

64.2 RW
1 89
191
412
San Joaquin Hills
West of Santa Rosa

64.8 RW
98 210
453
San Joaquin Hills
East of Santa Rosa

66.1 RW
118
253
546
San Joaquin Hills
West of Macarthur

66.2 RW
120
259
557
San Joaquin Hills
East of Macarthur

65.7 RW
112
241
520
San Clemente
East of Santa Barbara

58.3 RW
RW
78 167
San Clemente
West of Santa Cruz

58.5 RW
RW
79 171
Santa Barbara
West of Jamboree

54.4 RW
RW
RW
91 Santa Barbara
East of Jamboree

61.9 RW
RW
134
288
Santa Barbara
North of San Clemente

61.8 RW
RW
132
284
Santa Barbara
South of San Clemente

59.8 RW
RW
96 208
Santa Barbara
West of Newport CTR

59.2 RW
RW
88 190
Santa Barbara
East of Newport CTR

56.5 RW
RW
RW
125
San Miguel
West of Newport CTR

61.8 RW
RW
131
283
San Miguel
East of Newport CTR

63.8 RW
83 178
384
San Miguel
West of Avacado

64.8 RW
96 208
447
San Miguel
East of Avacado

66.5 RW
125
270
581
San Miguel
West of Macarthur

66.2 RW
119
257
555
San Miguel
East of Macarthur

63.1 RW
75 162
349
Coast Highway
West of Jamboree

71.0 117
252
542
1,167
Coast Highway
East of Jamboree

70.1 102
219
472
1,018
Coast Highway
West of Newport CTR

69.8 1 97
209
450
968
North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
32 Table 6-4 (3 of 3)
2016 With Project Conditions Noise Contours
Road
Segment
CNEL at
100 Feet
(dBA)
Distance to Contour (Feet)
70 dBA
CNEL
65 dBA
CNEL
60 dBA
CNEL
55 dBA
CNEL
Coast Highway
East of Newport CTR

69.0 86
185
399
860
Coast Highway
West of Avacado

68.9 84
181
390
1 841
Coast Highway
East of Avacado

69.0 86
185
398
858
Coast Highway
West of Macarthur

69.0 86
185
399
860
Coast Highway
East of Macarthur

70.4 106
228
491
1,058
"RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
33 indicates that the unmitigated off -site traffic noise levels will remain the same and range from 54.4 to 71.5. Project contributions are discussed in the following sections.

6.4 Existina With Proiect Traffic Noise Level Contributions Table 6-5 presents a comparison of the existing conditions noise levels for with and without the addition of project traffic associated with adding 94 residential dwelling units to San Joaquin Plaza.

The roadway noise increases will range from 0.0 dBA CNEL to 1.1 dBA CNEL with the development of the proposed project.

6.5 Year 2016 With Proiect Traffic Noise Level Contributions Table 6-6 presents a comparison of the Year 2016 noise levels for with and without the addition of project traffic associated with adding 94 residential dwelling units to San Joaquin Plaza. The roadway noise increases will range from 0.0 dBA CNEL and 0.3 dBA CNEL, with the development of the proposed project.

6.6 Off -Site Transportation Related Protect Noise Impacts Based on the significance criteria provided in Section 4.2, a new or substantial increase to the transportation -related noise impacts identified in the General Plan EIR occurs when there is a substantial increase in the ambient CNEL produced by new development impacting existing sensitive uses. According to the significance thresholds shown on Tables 6-5 and 6-6 (which are based on General Plan Policy N 1.8), 72 of the 73 study roadway segments within the project study area are not expected to create a potentially significant off -site transportation related noise impact.

Based on the Existing conditions off -site transportation noise impact analysis, the Newport Center segment north of San Miguel is the only roadway identified with a potentially significant impact.

However, the land uses neighboring this roadway segment consist primarily of commercial retail and office uses and not considered existing sensitive uses that would require additional off -site noise mitigation. As such, a significant impact for this roadway segment does not exist in for future Year 2016 condition.

For all of the 73 study area roadway segments, project related noise level increases are expected to be less than 1.0 to 3.0 dBA CNEL in Year 2016, which is considered "barely perceptible." All North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach, CA (JN: 08211-04 Noise Report)
OURBAM

CROSSROADS
34 Table 6-5 (1 of 3)
Existing Off -Site Project Related Traffic Noise Impacts Roadway
Segment
CNEL at 100 Feet (dBA)
Signifcance
Threshold
(dBA)'
Potential
Significant
Impact?2
No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
Jamboree
North of Eastbluff

68.8 68.9

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
Eastbluff to San Joaquin Hills

69.8 69.8

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
South of San Joaquin Hills

68.0 68.0

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
North of Santa Barbara

68.3 68.3

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
South of Santa Barbara

67.8 67.8

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
North of Coast Highway

67.5 67.5

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
South of Coast Highway

63.3 63.3

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
North of San Joaquin Hills

54.5 54.5

0.0 3.0
No
Santa Cruz
Souh of San Joaquin Hills

63.0 63.4

0.4 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
North of San Clemente

62.9 62.9

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
South of San Clemente

61.9 61.9

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
North of Newport CTR

61.7 61.7

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
South of Newport CTR

58.5 1 58.5

0.0 2.0
No
Newport CTR
West of Newport CTR

60.9 60.9

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
South of Santa Barbara

61.3 61.3

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
North of Santa Barbara

60.6 60.6

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
South of Santa Cruz

60.2 60.2

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
North of Santa Cruz

59.9 59.9

0.0 2.0
No
Newport CTR
North of Santa Rosa

60.6 60.6

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
South of Santa Rosa

62.0 62.1

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
North of San Miguel

61.0 62.1

1.1 1.0
Yes
Newport CTR
South of San Miguel

62.7 62.7

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
East of Newport CTR

61.9 61.9

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
South of Newport CTR (Circle

63.6 63.6

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
North of Coast Highway

64.2 64.2

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Rosa
North of San Joaquin Hills

58.0 58.0

0.0 2.0
No
Santa Rosa
South of San Joaquin Hills

63.8 1 63.8

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Rosa
North of Newport CTR

63.0 63.0

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Rosa
South of Newport CTR

60.5 60.5

0.0 1.0
No
Avocado
North of San Miguel

57.0 57.0

0.0 2.0
No
Avocado
South of San Miguel

62.0 62.0

0.0 1.0
No
Avocado
North of Coast Highway

60.4 60.4

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
North of Bonita Canyon

71.1 71.1

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
South of Bonita Canyon

70.3 70.3

0.0 1 1.0
No
Macarthur
INorth of San Joaquin Hills
1 70.3

70.3 1 0.0
1 1.0
1 No
North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
35 Table 6-5 (2 of 3)
Existing Off -Site Project Related Traffic Noise Impacts Roadway
Segment
CNEL at 100 Feet (dBA)
Signifcance
Threshold
(dBA)'
Potential
Significant
Impact?2
No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
Macarthur
South of San Joaquin Hills

68.3 68.3

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
North of San Miguel

67.9 67.9

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
South of San Miguel

67.0 1 67.0

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
North of Coast Highway

67.0 67.0

0.0 1.0
No
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
West of Jamboree

63.8 63.8

0.0 1.0
No
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
East of Jamboree

62.8 62.8

0.0 1.0
No
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
West of Bonita Canyon

62.1 62.2

0.0 1.0
No
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
East of Bonita Canyon

67.9 67.9

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
West of Jamboree

59.3 59.3

0.0 2.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
East of Jamboree

64.9 65.0

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
West of Santa Cruz

65.9 65.9

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
East of Santa Cruz

63.8 63.9

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
West of Santa Rosa

64.4 64.4

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
East of Santa Rosa

65.8 65.8

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
West of Macarthur

65.7 65.7

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
East of Macarthur

65.6 65.6

0.0 1.0
No
San Clemente
East of Santa Barbara

58.3 58.3

0.1 2.0
No
San Clemente
West of Santa Cruz

58.4 58.5

0.1 2.0
No
Santa Barbara
West of Jamboree

54.0 54.0

0.0 3.0
No
Santa Barbara
East of Jamboree

61.6 61.7

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Barbara
North of San Clemente

61.6 61.6

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Barbara
South of San Clemente

59.4 59.4

0.0 2.0
No
Santa Barbara
West of Newport CTR

58.8 58.8

0.1 2.0
No
Santa Barbara
East of Newport CTR

56.0 56.0

0.0 2.0
No
San Miguel
West of Newport CTR

61.1 61.1

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
East of Newport CTR

63.2 63.2

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
West of Avacado

64.3 64.3

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
East of Avacado

66.0 66.0

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
West of Macarthur

65.6 65.6

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
East of Macarthur

62.9 62.9

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
West of Jamboree

70.2 1 70.2

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
East of Jamboree

69.2 69.2

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
lWest of Newport CTR

68.9 68.9

0.0 1.0
No
North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
36 Table 6-5 (3 of 3)
Existing Off -Site Project Related Traffic Noise Impacts Roadway
Segment
CNEL at 100 Feet (dBA)
Signifcance
Threshold
(dBA)'
Potential
Significant
Impact?2
No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
Coast Highway
East of Newport CTR

68.0 68.0

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
West of Avacado

67.8 67.8

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
East of Avacado

68.1 1 68.1
1 0.0

1.0 No
Coast Highway
West of Macarthur

68.1 68.1

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
East of Macarthur

69.5 69.5

0.0 1.0
No
' Significant noise impact threshold defined by the City of Newport Beach Policy N 1.8. 2 Potential noise impact for existing noise sensitive uses.

North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
37 Table 6-6 (1 of 3)
Year 2016 Off -Site Project Related Traffic Noise Impacts Roadway
Segment
CNEL at 100 Feet (dBA)
Signifcance
Threshold
(dBA)'
Potential
Significant
Impact?2
No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
Jamboree
North of Eastbluff

69.6 69.7

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
Eastbluff to San Joaquin Hills

70.5 70.5

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
South of San Joaquin Hills

68.8 68.8

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
North of Santa Barbara

69.0 69.0

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
South of Santa Barbara

68.6 68.6

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
North of Coast Highway

68.3 68.3

0.0 1.0
No
Jamboree
South of Coast Highway

63.6 63.6

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
North of San Joaquin Hills

54.5 54.5

0.0 3.0
No
Santa Cruz
Souh of San Joaquin Hills

63.1 63.2

0.1 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
North of San Clemente

63.1 63.1

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
South of San Clemente

62.1 62.2

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
North of Newport CTR

62.0 62.0

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Cruz
South of Newport CTR

58.8 1 58.8

0.0 2.0
No
Newport CTR
West of Newport CTR

61.1 61.1

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
South of Santa Barbara

61.4 61.4

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
North of Santa Barbara

60.8 60.8

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
South of Santa Cruz

60.5 60.5

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
North of Santa Cruz

60.1 60.1

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
North of Santa Rosa

61.1 61.1

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
South of Santa Rosa

62.5 62.5

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
North of San Miguel

61.3 61.3

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
South of San Miguel

62.8 62.8

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
East of Newport CTR

62.0 62.0

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
South of Newport CTR (Circle

64.0 64.0

0.0 1.0
No
Newport CTR
North of Coast Highway

64.6 64.6

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Rosa
North of San Joaquin Hills

58.0 58.0

0.0 2.0
No
Santa Rosa
South of San Joaquin Hills

64.4 1 64.4

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Rosa
North of Newport CTR

63.7 63.7

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Rosa
South of Newport CTR

61.2 61.2

0.0 1.0
No
Avocado
North of San Miguel

57.8 57.8

0.0 2.0
No
Avocado
South of San Miguel

62.7 62.7

0.0 1.0
No
Avocado
North of Coast Highway

61.2 61.2

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
North of Bonita Canyon

71.5 71.5

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
South of Bonita Canyon

70.9 70.9

0.0 1 1.0
No
Macarthur
INorth of San Joaquin Hills
1 70.8

70.8 1 0.0
1 1.0
No
North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM

Table 6-6 (2 of 3)
Year 2016 Off -Site Project Related Traffic Noise Impacts Roadway
Segment
CNEL at 100 Feet (dBA)
Signifcance
Threshold
(dBA)'
Potential
Significant
Impact?2
No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
Macarthur
South of San Joaquin Hills

68.8 68.8

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
North of San Miguel

68.3 68.3

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
South of San Miguel

67.6 1 67.6

0.0 1.0
No
Macarthur
North of Coast Highway

67.6 67.6

0.0 1.0
No
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
West of Jamboree

64.0 64.0

0.0 1.0
No
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
East of Jamboree

63.0 63.1

0.0 1.0
No
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
West of Bonita Canyon

62.4 62.4

0.0 1.0
No
Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
East of Bonita Canyon

68.1 68.1

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
West of Jamboree

59.4 59.4

0.0 2.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
East of Jamboree

65.5 65.6

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
West of Santa Cruz

66.2 66.2

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
East of Santa Cruz

64.2 64.2

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
West of Santa Rosa

64.8 64.8

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
East of Santa Rosa

66.0 66.1

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
West of Macarthur

66.2 66.2

0.0 1.0
No
San Joaquin Hills
East of Macarthur

65.7 65.7

0.0 1.0
No
San Clemente
East of Santa Barbara

58.3 58.3

0.1 2.0
No
San Clemente
West of Santa Cruz

58.4 58.5

0.1 2.0
No
Santa Barbara
West of Jamboree

54.4 54.4

0.0 3.0
No
Santa Barbara
East of Jamboree

61.9 61.9

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Barbara
North of San Clemente

61.8 61.8

0.0 1.0
No
Santa Barbara
South of San Clemente

59.8 59.8

0.0 2.0
No
Santa Barbara
West of Newport CTR

59.2 59.2

0.0 2.0
No
Santa Barbara
East of Newport CTR

56.5 56.5

0.0 2.0
No
San Miguel
West of Newport CTR

61.8 61.8

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
East of Newport CTR

63.8 63.8

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
West of Avacado

64.8 64.8

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
East of Avacado

66.5 66.5

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
West of Macarthur

66.2 66.2

0.0 1.0
No
San Miguel
East of Macarthur

63.1 63.1

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
West of Jamboree

71.0 1 71.0

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
East of Jamboree

70.1 70.1

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
lWest of Newport CTR

69.8 69.8

0.0 1.0
No
North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
39 Table 6-6 (3 of 3)
Year 2016 Off -Site Project Related Traffic Noise Impacts Roadway
Segment
CNEL at 100 Feet (dBA)
Signifcance
Threshold
(dBA)'
Potential
Significant
Impact?2
No
Project
With
Project
Project
Addition
Coast Highway
East of Newport CTR

69.0 69.0

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
West of Avacado

68.9 68.9

0.0 1.0
No
Coast Highway
East of Avacado

69.0 1 69.0
1 0.0

1.0 No
Coast Highway
West of Macarthur

68.7 69.0

0.3 1.0
No
Coast Highway
East of Macarthur

70.4 70.4

0.0 1.0
No
' Significant noise impact threshold defined by the City of Newport Beach Policy N 1.8. 2 Potential noise impact for existing noise sensitive uses.

North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach CA (JN:08211-04) OURBAM
iO

noise level increases attributable to project -related traffic also are either below the thresholds established by General Plan Policy N 1.8, or would not impact a sensitive receptor. As such, the proposed project's contributions to off -site roadway noise increases for both existing conditions and year 2016 would not result in the exposure of persons to or result in the generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan, City Noise Ordinance, or applicable standards of any other agencies. Additionally, Project -related traffic would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project.

For General Plan buildout conditions, noise level increases attributable to project -related traffic would be less than the noise level increases presented in Table 6-6. This is because buildout of the General Plan would result in an overall increase in background traffic volumes, which would thereby result in an increase in background noise levels as compared to year 2016 conditions. As background traffic -related noise levels increase, noise increases attributable to project traffic would decrease. Therefore, since project -related noise increases would be less than the values presented in Table 6-6, Project -related traffic under General Plan buildout conditions would not result in the generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan, City Noise Ordinance, or applicable standards of any other agencies, nor would it result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project.

Based on the analysis presented above, traffic associated with the proposed project would not result in any new significant effects not discussed in the General Plan EIR, nor would Project traffic result in a substantial increase in the severity of any noise impacts previously identified in the General Plan EIR.

North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis City of Newport Beach, CA (JN. 08211-04 Noise Report)
OURBAM

CROSSROADS
41 APPENDIX 6.1
Off -Site FHWA Traffic Noise Model Printouts
North Newport Center Planned Community Noise Impact Analysis OURBAM City of Newport Beach, CA (JN.08211-03 Report.docx)

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Jamboree
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of Eastbluff

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt): 43,500 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
4,350 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrferAtten I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Jamboree
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: Eastbluff to San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt): 53,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
5,360 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrferAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 4.43
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 5.34
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -12.80
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -11.90
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -16.76
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -15.85
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leo Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leo Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

67.6 65.7

63.9 57.9

66.5 67.1
Autos.,

68.5 66.6

64.8 58.8

67.4 68.0
Medium Trucks:

61.3 59.8

53.5 51.9

60.4 60.6
Medium Trucks:

62.2 60.7

54.4 52.8

61.3 61.5
Heavy Tmcks:

62.2 60.8

51.7 53.0

61.3 61.5
Heavy Tmcks:

63.1 61.7

52.6 53.9

62.2 62.4
Vehicle Noise:

69.4 67.7

64.5 59.8

68.4 68.8
Vehicle Noise:

70.3 68.6

65.4 60.8

69.3 69.8
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
78 168
362
781
Ldn:
90 193
416
897
CNEL:
84 180
389
837
CNEL:
96 207
447
962
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Jamboree
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt): 36,000 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,600 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Jamboree
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: North of Santa Barbara

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt): 38,500 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,850 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dlst. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 3.61
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 3.90
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -13.63
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -13.33
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -17.58
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -17.29
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

66.8 64.9

63.1 57.0

65.7 66.3
Autos.,

67.0 65.2

63.4 57.3

66.0 66.6
Medium Trucks:

60.5 59.0

52.6 51.1

59.6 59.8
Medium Trucks:

60.8 59.3

52.9 51.4

59.9 60.1
Heavy Tmcks:

61.4 59.9

50.9 52.1

60.5 60.6
Heavy Tmcks:

61.6 60.2

51.2 52.4

60.8 60.9
Vehicle Noise:

68.6 66.9

63.7 59.0

67.6 68.0
Vehicle Noise:

68.9 67.1

64.0 59.3

67.9 68.3
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
69 148
319
688
Ldn:
72 155
334
720
CNEL:
74 159
343
738
CNEL:
77 166
358
772
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
Tueaday, May 29, 2012

6.1-1

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Jamboree
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: South of Santa Barbara

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt): 34,500 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,450 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TreMC Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrferAtten I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Jamboree
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: North of Coast Highway

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt): 32,000 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,200 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centerline Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrferAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 3.43
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 3.10
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medfum Trucks:

79.45 -13.81
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -14.14
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -17.77
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -18.09
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leo Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leo Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

66.6 64.7

62.9 56.9

65.5 66.1
Autos.,

66.2 64.3

62.6 56.5

65.1 65.8
Medium Trucks:

60.3 58.8

52.5 50.9

59.4 59.6
Medium Trucks:

60.0 58.5

52.1 50.6

59.0 59.3
Heavy Tmcks:

61.2 59.7

50.7 52.0

60.3 60.4
Heavy Tmcks:

60.8 59.4

50.4 51.6

60.0 60.1
Vehicle Noise:

68.4 66.7

63.5 58.8

67.4 67.8
Vehicle Noise:

68.1 66.3

63.2 58.5

67.1 67.5
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 deA
60 deA
55 dBA
Ldn.,
67 144
310
669
Ldn:
64 137
295
636
CNEL:
72 155
333
718
CNEL:
68 147
317
682
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Jamboree
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of Coast
Highway

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
12,200 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,220 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedfne Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Cruz
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: North of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
1,700 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
170 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedfne Dfst. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrferAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -1.09
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -9.65
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -18.33
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -26.88
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -22.28
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -30.84
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier, attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

62.1 60.2

58.4 52.3

61.0 61.6
Autos.,

53.2 51.3

49.6 43.5

52.1 52.7
Medium Trucks:

55.8 54.3

47.9 46.4

54.9 55.1
Medium Trucks:

47.0 45.5

39.1 37.6

46.0 46.3
Heavy Tmcks:

56.7 55.2

46.2 47.4

55.8 55.9
Heavy Tmcks:

47.8 46.4

37.4 38.6

47.0 47.1
Vehicle Noise:

63.9 62.2

59.0 54.3

62.9 63.3
Vehicle Noise:

55.1 53.3

50.2 45.5

54.0 54.5
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
33 72
155
334
Ldn:
9 19
40 86
CNEL:
36 77
167
359
CNEL:
9 20
43 92
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
Tueaday, May 29, 2012

6.1-2

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Cruz
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: Souh of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT
DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt): 12,000
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,200 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrferAtten I Bann Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Cruz
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: North of San Clemente

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TraMc (Adt): 11,700
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,170 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Barrier Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrferAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -1.16
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -1.27
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -18.40
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -18.51
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -22.35
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -22.46
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Lan
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Lan
CNEL
Autos.,

61.7 59.8

58.0 52.0

60.6 61.2
Autos.,

61.6 59.7

57.9 51.9

60.5 61.1
Medium Trucks:

55.5 54.0

47.6 46.0

54.5 54.7
Medium Trucks:

55.4 53.8

47.5 45.9

54.4 54.6
Heavy Trucks:

56.3 54.9

45.8 47.1

55.5 55.6
Heavy Trucks:

56.2 54.8

45.7 47.0

55.3 55.5
Vehicle Noise:

63.5 61.8

58.7 54.0

62.5 63.0
Vehicle Noise:

63.4 61.7

58.5 53.9

62.4 62.9
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
32 68
147
317
Ldn:
31 67
145
312
CNEL:
34 73
158
340
CNEL:
33 72
155
334
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Cruz
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of San Clemente

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TraMc (Adt):
9,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
930 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Barrier Haight: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Be Berm Allen
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Cruz
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: North of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
8,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
890 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Barrier Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height(Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrferAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -2.27
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -2.46
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -19.50
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -19.70
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -23.46
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks.,

84.25 -23.65
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

60.6 58.7

56.9 50.9

59.5 60.1
Autos.,

60.4 58.5

56.7 50.7

59.3 59.9
Medium Trucks:

54.4 52.8

46.5 44.9

53.4 53.6
Medium Trucks:

54.2 52.7

46.3 44.7

53.2 53.4
Heavy Tmcks:

55.2 53.8

44.7 46.0

54.3 54.5
Heavy Tmcks:

55.0 53.6

44.5 45.8

54.2 54.3
Vehicle Noise:

62.4 60.7

57.5 52.9

61.4 61.9
Vehicle Noise:

62.2 60.5

57.4 52.7

61.2 61.7
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
27 58
124
267
Ldn:
26 56
121
260
CNEL:
29 62
133
287
CNEL:
28 60
129
279
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012

6.1-3

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Cruz
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT
DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
4,300 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
430 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculalions
VehicleType REMELI
Traffic Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BaM rAtten I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: West of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
7,000 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
700 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Barrier Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrferAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -5.62
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -3.50
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -22.85
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -20.74
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -26.81
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -24.69
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Lan
CNEL
Autos.,

57.3 55.4

53.6 47.5

56.2 56.8
Autos.,

59.6 57.7

56.0 49.9

58.5 59.2
Medium Trucks:

51.0 49.5

43.1 41.6

50.1 50.3
Medium Trucks:

53.4 51.9

45.5 44.0

52.4 52.7
Heavy Trucks:

51.8 50.4

41.4 42.6

51.0 51.1
Heavy Trucks:

54.2 52.8

43.8 45.0

53.4 53.5
Vehicle Noise:

59.1 57.3

54.2 49.5

58.1 58.5
Vehicle Noise:

61.5 59.7

56.6 51.9

60.5 60.9
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
16 34
74 160
Ldn:
23 50
107
231
CNEL:
17 37
80 172
CNEL:
25 53
115
248
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of Santa Barbara

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
7,700 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
770 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Barrier Haight: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: North of Santa Barbara

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
6,500 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
650 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Barrier Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height(Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -3.09
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -3.82
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -20.32
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -21.06
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -24.28
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -25.02
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

60.1 58.2

56.4 50.3

59.0 59.6
Autos.,

59.3 57.4

55.7 49.6

58.2 58.8
Medium Trucks:

53.8 52.3

45.9 44.4

52.9 53.1
Medium Trucks:

53.1 51.6

45.2 43.7

52.1 52.4
Heavy Trucks.

54.7 53.2

44.2 45.4

53.8 53.9
Heavy Trucks.

53.9 52.5

43.5 44.7

53.1 53.2
Vehicle Noise:

61.9 60.2

57.0 52.3

60.9 61.3
Vehicle Noise:

61.2 59.4

56.3 51.6

60.1 60.6
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o deA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
25 53
114
246
Ldn:
22 47
102
220
CNEL:
26 57
123
264
CNEL:
24 51
109
236
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012

6.1-4

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: South of Santa Cruz

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
6,000 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
600 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Band rAtten I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: North of Santa Cruz

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
5,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
560 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -4.17
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -4.47
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -21.41
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -21.71
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -25.36
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -25.66
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and harrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

59.0 57.1

55.3 49.3

57.9 58.5
Autos.,

58.7 56.8

55.0 49.0

57.6 58.2
Medium Trucks:

52.7 51.2

44.9 43.3

51.8 52.0
Medium Trucks:

52.4 50.9

44.6 43.0

51.5 51.7
Heavy Trucks:

53.6 52.2

43.1 44.4

52.7 52.8
Heavy Trucks:

53.3 51.9

42.8 44.1

52.4 52.5
Vehicle Noise:

60.8 59.1

55.9 51.2

59.8 60.2
Vehicle Noise:

60.5 58.8

55.6 50.9

59.5 59.9
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
21 45
97 208
Ldn:
20 43
92 199
CNEL:
22 48
104
224
CNEL:
21 46
99 214
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: North of Santa Rosa

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
6,500 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
650 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Date
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: South of Santa Rosa

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
9,100 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
910 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -3.82
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -2.36
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -21.06
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -19.60
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -25.02
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -23.55
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

59.3 57.4

55.7 49.6

58.2 58.8
Autos.,

60.8 58.9

57.1 51.1

59.7 60.3
Medium Trucks:

53.1 51.6

45.2 43.7

52.1 52.4
Medium Trucks:

54.5 53.0

46.7 45.1

53.6 53.8
Heavy Trucks.

53.9 52.5

43.5 44.7

53.1 53.2
Heavy Trucks.

55.4 54.0

44.9 46.2

54.5 54.7
Vehicle Noise:

61.2 59.4

56.3 51.6

60.1 60.6
Vehicle Noise:

62.6 60.9

57.7 53.0

61.6 62.0
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
22 47
102
220
Ldn:
28 59
128
275
CNEL:
24 51
109
236
CNEL:
30 64
137
295
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012

6.1-5

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
7,200 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
720 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(O-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
Traffic Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Band rAtten I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: South of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
10,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,060 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(O-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -3.38
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -1.70
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -20.62
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -18.94
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -24.57
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -22.89
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

59.8 57.9

56.1 50.0

58.7 59.3
Autos.,

61.4 59.5

57.8 51.7

60.4 61.0
Medium Trucks:

53.5 52.0

45.7 44.1

52.6 52.8
Medium Trucks:

55.2 53.7

47.3 45.8

54.2 54.5
Heavy Trucks:

54.4 52.9

43.9 45.2

53.5 53.6
Heavy Trucks:

56.0 54.6

45.6 46.8

55.2 55.3
Vehicle Noise:

61.6 59.9

56.7 52.0

60.6 61.0
Vehicle Noise:

63.3 61.5

58.4 53.7

62.3 62.7
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dRA
Ldn:
24 51
109
235
Ldn:
30 66
141
305
CNEL:
25 54
117
252
CNEL:
33 70
152
327
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
8,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
880 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tracks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tracks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: South of Newport CTR (Circle

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
12,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,290 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(O-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tracks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height(Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -2.51
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -0.85
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -19.74
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -18.08
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -23.70
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -22.04
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

60.6 58.7

57.0 50.9

59.5 60.1
Autos.,

62.3 60.4

58.6 52.6

61.2 61.8
Medium Trucks:

54.4 52.9

46.5 45.0

53.4 53.7
Medium Trucks:

56.1 54.5

48.2 46.6

55.1 55.3
Heavy Trucks.

55.2 53.8

44.8 46.0

54.4 54.5
Heavy Trucks.

56.9 55.5

46.4 47.7

56.0 56.2
Vehicle Noise:

62.5 60.7

57.6 52.9

61.4 61.9
Vehicle Noise:

64.1 62.4

59.2 54.6

63.1 63.6
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
27 58
125
269
Ldn:
35 75
161
347
CNEL:
29 62
134
289
CNEL:
37 80
173
372
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012

6.1-6

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Newport CTR
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of Coast Highway

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,490 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMC Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BardarAffen I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Rosa
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
3,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
380 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feel)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAffen I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -0.22
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -6.15
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -17.46
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -23.39
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -21.41
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -27.35
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

62.9 61.0

59.3 53.2

61.8 62.4
Autos.,

56.7 54.8

53.0 47.0

55.6 56.2
Medium Trucks:

56.7 55.2

48.8 47.3

55.7 56.0
Medium Trucks:

50.5 49.0

42.6 41.1

49.5 49.7
Heavy Tmcks:

57.5 56.1

47.1 48.3

56.7 56.8
Heavy Tmcks:

51.3 49.9

40.9 42.1

50.5 50.6
Vehicle Noise:

64.8 63.0

59.9 55.2

63.7 64.2
Vehicle Noise:

58.5 56.8

53.7 49.0

57.5 58.0
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 deA
60 deA
55 dBA
Ldn:
38 82
177
382
Ldn:
15 32
68 147
CNEL:
41 88
190
410
CNEL:
16 34
73 158
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Rosa
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,500
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,450 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Be Berm Allen
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Rosa
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,200
vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,220 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height(Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feel)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -0.34
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -1.09
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -17.58
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -18.33
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -21.53
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -22.28
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

62.5 60.6

58.9 52.8

61.4 62.0
Autos.,

61.8 59.9

58.1 52.1

60.7 61.3
Medium Trucks:

56.3 54.8

48.4 46.9

55.3 55.6
Medium Trucks:

55.5 54.0

47.7 46.1

54.6 54.8
Heavy Tmcks:

57.1 55.7

46.7 47.9

56.3 56.4
Heavy Tmcks:

56.4 55.0

45.9 47.2

55.5 55.7
Vehicle Noise:

64.4 62.6

59.5 54.8

63.3 63.8
Vehicle Noise:

63.6 61.9

58.7 54.0

62.6 63.0
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
36 77
167
360
Ldn:
32 69
149
320
CNEL:
39 83
179
386
CNEL:
34 74
160
3"
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
Tueaday, May 29, 2012

6.1-7

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Santa Rosa
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: South of Newport CTR

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT
DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
6,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
680 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise S- Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
Traffic Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAtfen I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Avocado
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: North of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
4,200 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
420 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0 %
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 -3.63
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos.

66.51 -5.21
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -20.86
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -22.45
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -24.82
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

82.99 -26.40
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Lan
CNEL
Autos.,

59.2 57.3

55.6 49.5

58.1 58.7
Autos.,

55.6 53.7

51.9 45.9

54.5 55.1
Medium Trucks:

53.0 51.5

45.1 43.6

52.0 52.3
Medium Trucks:

49.6 48.1

41.7 40.1

48.6 48.8
Heavy Trucks:

53.8 52.4

43.4 44.6

53.0 53.1
Heavy Trucks:

50.9 49.5

40.4 41.7

50.0 50.2
Vehicle Noise:

61.1 59.3

56.2 51.5

60.0 60.5
Vehicle Noise:

57.6 55.9

52.6 48.0

56.6 57.0
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Lain:
22 47
101
217
Lain:
13 27
59 127
CNEL:
23 50
108
233
CNEL:
14 29
63 136
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Avocado
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: South of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
13,100 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,310 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barrier
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0 %
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Avocado
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of Coast Highway

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
9,200 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
920 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(O-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height(Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet'
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0 %
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos.

66.51 -0.27
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos.

66.51 -1.80
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -17.51
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -19.04
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

82.99 -21.46
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

82.99 -23.00
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

60.5 58.6

56.9 50.8

59.4 60.0
Autos.,

59.0 57.1

55.3 49.3

57.9 58.5
Medium Trucks:

54.5 53.0

46.6 45.1

53.5 53.8
Medium Trucks:

53.0 51.5

45.1 43.5

52.0 52.2
Heavy Trucks.

55.8 54.4

45.4 46.6

55.0 55.1
Heavy Trucks.

54.3 52.9

43.8 45.1

53.4 53.6
Vehicle Noise:

62.5 60.8

57.5 53.0

61.5 62.0
Vehicle Noise:

61.0 59.3

56.0 51.4

60.0 60.4
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Lain,
27 59
126
272
Lain:
21 46
100
215
CNEL:
29 63
135
291
CNEL:
23 50
107
230
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of Bonita Canyon

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic, (Adt): 72,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
7,290 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculalions
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAtten I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: South of Bonita Canyon

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TraMc (Adt): 61,400 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
6,140 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 6.68
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 5.93
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -10.56
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -11.31
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -14.52
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -15.26
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

69.8 67.9

66.2 60.1

68.7 69.3
Autos.,

69.1 67.2

65.4 59.4

68.0 68.6
Medium Trucks:

63.6 62.1

55.7 54.2

62.6 62.9
Medium Trucks:

62.8 61.3

55.0 53.4

61.9 62.1
Heavy Trucks:

64.4 63.0

54.0 55.2

63.6 63.7
Heavy Trucks:

63.7 62.3

53.2 54.5

62.8 62.9
Vehicle Noise:

71.7 69.9

66.8 62.1

70.6 71.1
Vehicle Noise:

70.9 69.2

66.0 61.3

69.9 70.3
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
110
237
511
1,101
Ldn:
98 212
456
982
CNEL:
118
255
548
1,181
CNEL:
105
227
489
1,054
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: North of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TraMc (Adt): 61,400 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
6,140 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: South of San Joaquin Hills

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TraMc (Adt): 38,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,880 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height(Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 5.93
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 3.94
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -11.31
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -13.30
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -15.26
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks.,

84.25 -17.26
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and harrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

69.1 67.2

65.4 59.4

68.0 68.6
Autos.,

67.1 65.2

63.4 57.4

66.0 66.6
Medium Trucks:

62.8 61.3

55.0 53.4

61.9 62.1
Medium Trucks:

60.8 59.3

53.0 51.4

59.9 60.1
Heavy Tmcks:

63.7 62.3

53.2 54.5

62.8 62.9
Heavy Tmcks:

61.7 60.3

51.2 52.5

60.8 61.0
Vehicle Noise:

70.9 69.2

66.0 61.3

69.9 70.3
Vehicle Noise:

68.9 67.2

64.0 59.3

67.9 68.3
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
98 212
456
982
Ldn:
72 156
336
723
CNEL:
105
227
489
1,054
CNEL:
78 167
360
776
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012

6.1-9

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: North of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt): 34,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,480 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BardarAtten I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: South of San Miguel

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 28,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,860 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL I
Traffic, Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 3.46
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 2.61
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -13.77
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -14.63
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -17.73
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -18.58
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

66.6 64.7

62.9 56.9

65.5 66.1
Autos.,

65.8 63.9

62.1 56.0

64.7 65.3
Medium Trucks:

60.4 58.9

52.5 51.0

59.4 59.6
Medium Trucks:

59.5 58.0

51.6 50.1

58.6 58.8
Heavy Trucks:

61.2 59.8

50.8 52.0

60.4 60.5
Heavy Trucks:

60.4 58.9

49.9 51.1

59.5 59.6
Vehicle Noise:

68.4 66.7

63.6 58.9

67.4 67.9
Vehicle Noise:

67.6 65.9

62.7 58.0

66.6 67.0
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 deA
60 deA
55 dBA
Ldn:
67 145
312
673
Ldn:
59 127
274
590
CNEL:
72 155
335
722
CNEL:
63 136
294
633
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Macarthur
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: North of Coast Highway

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt): 28,700 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,870 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic, Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita
Cyn
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: Westof Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
14,400 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,440 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Barney.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
Traffic, Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 2.63
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -0.37
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -14.61
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -17.61
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -18.57
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -21.56
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuaffon) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

65.8 63.9

62.1 56.1

64.7 65.3
Autos.,

62.5 60.6

58.8 52.8

61.4 62.0
Medium Trucks:

59.5 58.0

51.7 50.1

58.6 58.8
Medium Trucks:

56.3 54.7

48.4 46.8

55.3 55.5
Heavy Trucks.

60.4 59.0

49.9 51.2

59.5 59.6
Heavy Trucks.

57.1 55.7

46.6 47.9

56.2 56.4
Vehicle Noise:

67.6 65.9

62.7 58.0

66.6 67.0
Vehicle Noise:

64.3 62.6

59.4 54.8

63.3 63.8
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 deA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
59 127
275
592
Ldn:
36 77
166
358
CNEL:
63 137
295
635
CNEL:
38 83
178
384
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012

6.1-10

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita
Cyn
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment East of Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
11,500 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,150 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAtten I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Eastbluff/Ford/Bonita Cyn
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: West of Bonita
Canyon

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
9,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
990 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Barrier Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -1.34
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -1.99
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -18.58
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -19.23
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -22.54
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -23.19
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

61.5 59.6

57.9 51.8

60.4 61.0
Autos.,

60.9 59.0

57.2 51.2

59.8 60.4
Medium Trucks:

55.3 53.8

47.4 45.9

54.3 54.6
Medium Trucks:

54.6 53.1

46.8 45.2

53.7 53.9
Heavy Tmcks:

56.1 54.7

45.7 46.9

55.3 55.4
Heavy Tmcks:

55.5 54.0

45.0 46.3

54.6 54.7
Vehicle Noise:

63.4 61.6

58.5 53.8

62.3 62.8
Vehicle Noise:

62.7 61.0

57.8 53.1

61.7 62.1
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 ci
Ldn:
31 66
143
308
Ldn:
28 60
129
279
CNEL:
33 71
153
330
CNEL:
30 64
139
299
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: Easibluff/Ford/Bonita
Cyn
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Bonita Canyon

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
37,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
3,760 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
52 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Barrier Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 96.607
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 96.566
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 96.608
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Be Berm Allen
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: Westof Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
4,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
480 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Barrier Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 3.80
-4.39
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 -5.14
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -13.44
-4.39
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -22.38
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -17.39
-4.39
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -26.33
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

66.7 64.8

63.0 56.9

65.6 66.2
Autos.,

58.0 56.1

54.3 48.3

56.9 57.5
Medium Trucks:

60.4 58.9

52.6 51.0

59.5 59.7
Medium Trucks:

51.8 50.3

43.9 42.3

50.8 51.0
Heavy Tmcks:

61.3 59.8

50.8 52.1

60.4 60.5
Heavy Tmcks:

52.6 51.2

42.1 43.4

51.8 51.9
Vehicle Noise:

68.5 66.8

63.6 58.9

67.5 67.9
Vehicle Noise:

59.8 58.1

55.0 50.3

58.8 59.3
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
7o dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
68 146
315
679
Ldn:
18 39
83 180
CNEL:
73 157
338
728
CNEL:
19 42
89 193
Tueaday, May 29, 2012
Tueaday, May 29, 2012

6.1-11

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment East of Jamboree

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
17,700 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,770 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
TraMc Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAtfim I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: West of Santa Cruz

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
21,900 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,190 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 0.53
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 1.45
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -16.71
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -15.78
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -20.67
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -19.74
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Lan
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Lon
CNEL
Autos.,

63.7 61.8

60.0 54.0

62.6 63.2
Autos.,

64.6 62.7

60.9 54.9

63.5 64.1
Medium Trucks:

57.4 55.9

49.6 48.0

56.5 56.7
Medium Trucks:

58.4 56.8

50.5 48.9

57.4 57.6
Heavy Trucks:

58.3 56.9

47.8 49.1

57.4 57.5
Heavy Trucks:

59.2 57.8

48.7 50.0

58.3 58.5
Vehicle Noise:

65.5 63.8

60.6 55.9

64.5 64.9
Vehicle Noise:

66.4 64.7

61.5 56.9

65.4 65.9
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centerfine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
1 70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
43 92
199
429
Ldn:
49 106
229
494
CNEL:
46 99
213
460
CNEL:
53 114
246
530
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: East of Santa Cruz

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
13,700 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,370 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(O-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: West of Santa Rosa

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
15,700 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
1,570 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMc Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 -0.58
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 0.01
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -17.82
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -17.23
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -21.78
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -21.19
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

62.6 60.7

58.9 52.8

61.5 62.1
Autos.,

63.2 61.3

59.5 53.4

62.1 62.7
Medium Trucks:

56.3 54.8

48.4 46.9

55.4 55.6
Medium Trucks:

56.9 55.4

49.0 47.5

56.0 56.2
Heavy Tmcks:

57.2 55.7

46.7 48.0

56.3 56.4
Heavy Tmcks:

57.8 56.3

47.3 48.5

56.9 57.0
Vehicle Noise:

64.4 62.7

59.5 54.8

63.4 63.8
Vehicle Noise:

65.0 63.2

60.1 55.4

64.0 64.4
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
36 78
168
361
Ldn:
40 85
184
396
CNEL:
39 84
180
388
CNEL:
42 91
197
425
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012

6.1-12

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: East of Santa Rosa

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
21,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,160 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise S- Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMELI
Traffic Flow I Distance
Finite Road Fresnel Bard rAtfim I Berm Aden
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: West of Macarthur

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Traffic (Adt):
21,200 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,120 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Trucks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Trucks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType I REMEL
I TreMC Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarderAtten I Berm Allen
Autos.

68.46 1.39
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

68.46 1.31
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -15.84
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

79.45 -15.93
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks:

84.25 -19.80
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Trucks.,

84.25 -19.88
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Lan
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Lan
CNEL
Autos.,

64.5 62.6

60.9 54.8

63.4 64.0
Autos.,

64.5 62.6

60.8 54.7

63.4 64.0
Medium Trucks:

58.3 56.8

50.4 48.9

57.3 57.6
Medium Trucks:

58.2 56.7

50.3 48.8

57.3 57.5
Heavy Tmcks:

59.1 57.7

48.7 49.9

58.3 58.4
Heavy Tmcks:

59.1 57.6

48.6 49.8

58.2 58.3
Vehicle Noise:

66.4 64.6

61.5 56.8

65.3 65.8
Vehicle Noise:

66.3 64.6

61.4 56.7

65.3 65.7
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
49 105
227
490
Ldn:
48 104
224
483
CNEL:
53 113
244
525
CNEL:
52 112
241
519
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Joaquin
Hills
Job Number: 8211
Road Segment: Eastof Macarthur

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
20,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
2,060 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
45 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
76 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 92.547
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 92.504
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 92.547
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMC Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Clemente
Job Number. 8211
Road Segment: East of Santa Barbara

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily TreMc (Adt):
5,600 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
560 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed.,
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84
Baffler Height: 0.0 het
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Tmcks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner.
100.0 feet
No Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment., 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet)
Road Elevation:

0.0 feet
Autos: 98.412
Road Grade: 0.0%
Left View:
-90.0 degrees
Medium Tmcks: 98.372
Right View:

90.0 degrees
Heavy Tmcks: 98.413
FHWA Noise Model Calculations
VehicleType REMEL
TreMC Flow Distance
Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Allen
Autos:

68.46 1.19
-4.11
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Autos:

66.51 -3.96
-4.51
-1.20 -4.87

0.000

0.000
Medium Tmcks:

79.45 -16.05
-4.11
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Medium Trucks:

77.72 -21.20
-4.51
-1.20 -4.97

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

84.25 -20.01
-4.11
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Heavy Tmcks:

82.99 -25.15
-4.51
-1.20 -5.16

0.000

0.000
Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) Unmitigated Noise Levels (without
Topo and barrier attenuation)
VehicleType
Leq Peak Hour
Leq Day
Leq Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
VehicleType I
Leq Peak Hour I
Leq Day FLeq
Evening
Leq Night
Ldn
CNEL
Autos.,

64.3 62.4

60.7 54.6

63.2 63.8
Autos.,

56.8 54.9

53.2 47.1

55.7 56.3
Medium Trucks:

58.1 56.6

50.2 48.7

57.1 57.4
Medium Trucks:

50.8 49.3

42.9 41.4

49.9 50.1
Heavy Tmcks:

58.9 57.5

48.5 49.7

58.1 58.2
Heavy Tmcks:

52.1 50.7

41.7 42.9

51.3 51.4
Vehicle Noise:

66.2 64.4

61.3 56.6

65.1 65.6
Vehicle Noise:

58.8 57.1

53.8 49.3

57.8 58.3
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet)
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
70 dBA
65 dBA
60 dBA
55 dBA
Ldn:
47 102
220
474
Ldn:
15 33
72 154
CNEL:
51 110
236
509
CNEL:
17 36
77 165
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012
Tuestlay, May 29, 2012

6.1-13

FHWA-RD-77-108
Scenario: Existing

HIGHWAY

NOISE PREDICTION MODEL
Project Name: NNCPC
Road Name: San Clemente
Job Numbe, 8211
Road Segment: West of Santa Cmz

SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA

NOISE MODEL INPUTS
Highway Data
Site Conditions (Hard =10, Soft =15)
Average Daily Tmfifc (Adt):
5,800 vehicles
Autos: 15
Peak Hour Percentage:
10 %
Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15
Peak Hour Volume:
580 vehicles
Heavy Trucks (3+Axles): 15
Vehicle Speed:
40 mph
Vehicle Mix
Near/Far Lane Distance:
36 feet
VehicleType I Day Evening Night Daily
Site Data
Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42%
Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84%
Baffler Height: 0.0 feet
Barrier Type(0-Wall, 1-Berm):

0.0 Heavy Trucks., 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74%
Centerline Dist. to Berner
100.0 feet
Noise Source Elevations (in feet)
Centedine Dist. to Observer.
100.0 feet
Autos: 2.000
Barrier Distance to Observer:

0.0 feet
Medium Trucks: 4.000
Observer Height (Above Pad):

5.0 feet
Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment.: 0.0
Pad Elevation:

0.0 feet
Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet)
Road Elevation: