Agenda — Norco City Council, May 7, 2025 (part 2 of 3)

CA-5
policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for asbestos environmental hazards. In the event this Contract involves any mold environmental hazard (e.g., mold remediation), the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be endorsed to include coverage for mold environmental hazards and “microbial matter including mold” within the definition of “Pollution” under the policy.

Contractor shall be responsible for payment of any deductibles contained in any insurance policies required hereunder and Contractor shall also be responsible for payment of any selfinsured retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to, and approved by, the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion. At the option of the City Manager or his/her designee, either (i) the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects City, its officers, officials, employees and agents; or (ii) Contractor shall provide a financial guarantee, satisfactory to the City Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion, guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. At no time shall City be responsible for the payment of any deductibles or self-insured retentions.

All policies of insurance required hereunder shall be endorsed to provide that the coverage shall not be cancelled, non-renewed, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 calendar day written notice has been given to City. Upon issuance by the insurer, broker, or agent of a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or reduction in coverage or in limits, Contractor shall furnish City with a new certificate and applicable endorsements for such policy(ies). In the event any policy is due to expire during the work to be performed for City, Contractor shall provide a new certificate, and applicable endorsements, evidencing renewal of such policy not less than 15 calendar days prior to the expiration date of the expiring policy.

The General Liability and Automobile Liability insurance policies shall be written on an occurrence form. The Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy shall be written on either an occurrence form, or a claims-made form. The General Liability (including ongoing operations and completed operations), Automobile Liability and Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policies shall name City, its officers, officials, employees and agents as an additional insured.

All such policies of insurance shall be endorsed so Contractor’s insurance shall be primary and no contribution shall be required of City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. The Builders Risk (Course of Construction) insurance policy shall be endorsed to name the City as a loss payee. Any Workers’ Compensation insurance policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation as to City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. The coverage(s) shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees and agents. If Contractor maintains higher limits of liability than the minimums shown above, City requires and shall be entitled to coverage for the higher limits of liability maintained by Contractor.

Claims-Made Policies – If any coverage required is written on a claims-made coverage form:
(i) The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the effective date of the Contract or the commencement of work by Contractor.
(ii) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Contract, whichever first occurs. (iii) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claimsmade policy form with a retroactive date prior to the effective date of the Contract, or work commencement date, Contractor must purchase extended reporting period coverage for a

Page 226 of 484 ends

CA-6
minimum of 5 years after completion of the work or termination of the Contract, whichever first occurs.
(iv) A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City for review. (v) These requirements shall survive expiration or termination of the Contract.

Contractor shall furnish City with all certificate(s) and applicable endorsements effecting coverage required hereunder. All certificates and applicable endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager or his/her designee in his/her sole discretion prior to City’s execution of the Contract and before work commences. Upon request of City, Contractor shall immediately furnish City with a complete copy of any insurance policy required under this Contract, including all endorsements, with said copy certified by the underwriter to be a true and correct copy of the original policy. This requirement shall survive expiration or termination of this Contract.

If at any time during the life of the Contract or any extension, Contractor or any of its subcontractors fail to maintain any required insurance in full force and effect, all work under this Contract shall be discontinued immediately, and all payments due or that become due to Contractor shall be withheld until notice is received by City that the required insurance has been restored to full force and effect and that the premiums therefore have been paid for a period satisfactory to City. Any failure to maintain the required insurance shall be sufficient cause for City to terminate this Contract. No action taken by City hereunder shall in any way relieve Contractor of its responsibilities under this Contract.

The fact that insurance is obtained by Contractor shall not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of Contractor, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this Contract. The duty to indemnify City shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor. Approval or purchase of any insurance contracts or policies shall in no way relieve from liability nor limit the liability of Contractor, its principals, officers, agents, employees, persons under the supervision of Contractor, vendors, suppliers, invitees, consultants, sub-consultants, subcontractors, or anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them.

In the event of a partial or total destruction by the perils insured against of any or all of the work and/or materials herein provided for at any time prior to the final completion of the Contract and the final acceptance by the City of the work or materials to be performed or supplied thereunder, the Contractor shall promptly reconstruct, repair, replace, or restore all work or materials so destroyed or injured at his/her sole cost and expense. Nothing herein provided for shall in any way excuse the Contractor or his/her insurance company from the obligation of furnishing all the required materials and completing the work in full compliance with the terms of the Contract.

If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the services to be performed under this Contract, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to provide insurance protection in favor of City, its officers, officials, employees and agents in accordance with the terms of each of the preceding paragraphs, except that the subcontractors’ certificates and endorsements shall be on file with Contractor and City prior to the commencement of any work by the subcontractor.

3.2.10 Safety. Contractor shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In constructing the Project, the Contractor shall at

Page 227 of 484 ends

CA-7
all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.2.11 Bonds.

3.2.11.1 Performance Bond. Contractor shall execute and provide to City concurrently with this Agreement a Performance Bond in the amount of the total, not-toexceed compensation indicated in this Agreement, and in a form provided or approved by the City. If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until it has been received and approved by the City.

3.2.11.2 Payment Bond. Contractor shall execute and provide to City concurrently with this Agreement a Payment Bond in the amount of the total, not-to-exceed compensation indicated in this Agreement, and in a form provided or approved by the City. If such bond is required, no payment will be made to Contractor until it has been received and approved by City.

3.2.11.3 Bond Provisions. Should, in City’s sole opinion, any bond become insufficient or any surety be found to be unsatisfactory, Contractor shall renew or replace the affected bond within 10 days of receiving notice from City. In the event the surety or Contractor intends to reduce or cancel any required bond, at least thirty (30) days prior written notice shall be given to the City, and Contractor shall post acceptable replacement bonds at least ten (10) days prior to expiration of the original bonds. No further payments shall be deemed due or will be made under this Agreement until any replacement bonds required by this section are accepted by the City. To the extent, if any, that the total compensation is increased in accordance with the Agreement, the Contractor shall, upon request of the City, cause the amount of the bonds to be increased accordingly and shall promptly deliver satisfactory evidence of such increase to the City. To the extent available, the bonds shall further provide that no change or alteration of the Agreement (including, without limitation, an increase in the total compensation, as referred to above), extensions of time, or modifications of the time, terms, or conditions of payment to the Contractor, will release the surety. If the Contractor fails to furnish any required bond, the City may terminate this Agreement for cause.

3.2.11.4 Surety Qualifications. Only bonds executed by an admitted surety insurer, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 995.120, shall be accepted. The surety must be a California admitted surety with a current A.M. Best’s rating no less than A:VIII and satisfactory to the City. If a California admitted surety insurer issuing bonds does not meet these requirements, the insurer will be considered qualified if it is in conformance with Section 995.660 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, and proof of such is provided to the City.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

Page 228 of 484 ends

CA-8

3.3.1 Compensation. Contractor shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all construction services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Extra work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Contractor shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed by Contractor. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Contractor shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Contractor perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Contractor shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from City’s Representative.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 1600, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Contractor with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Contractor shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Contractor's principal place of business and at the project site. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Contractor shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

Page 229 of 484 ends

CA-9

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Contractor, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Contractor of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Contractor shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Contractor shall be entitled to no further compensation. Contractor may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Contractor to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Contractor in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Contractor shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the follow address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Contractor:

All American Asphalt
PO Box 2229
Corona, CA 92878
Attention: Edward J. Carlson – Vice President
City:

City of Norco
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Attention: Director of Public Works
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the US Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another, and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.5.4 Attorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.

3.5.5 Indemnification. To the furthest extent allowed by law, including California Civil Code section 2782, Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and its

Page 230 of 484 ends

CA-10
officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs and damages (whether in contract, tort or strict liability, including but not limited to personal injury, death at any time and property damage) incurred by City, Contractor or any other person, and from any and all claims, demands and actions in law or equity (including attorney's fees and litigation expenses), arising or alleged to have arisen directly or indirectly out of performance of this Agreement. Contractor’s obligations under the preceding sentence shall apply regardless of whether City or any of its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers are passively negligent, but shall not apply to any loss, liability, fines, penalties, forfeitures, costs or damages caused by the active or sole negligence, or the willful misconduct, of City or any of its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.

If Contractor should subcontract all or any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement, Contractor shall require each subcontractor to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers in accordance with the terms of the preceding paragraph.

This section shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement.

3.5.6 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.5.7 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Riverside County.

3.5.8 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.5.9 City’s Right to Employ Other Contractors. City reserves right to employ other contractors in connection with this Project.

3.5.10 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.5.11 Assignment or Transfer. Contractor shall not assign, hypothecate or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

3.5.12 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be work days (Monday through Friday, excluding holidays). All references to Contractor include all personnel, employees, agents, and subcontractors of Contractor, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content or intent of this Agreement.

Page 231 of 484 ends

CA-11

3.5.13 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.5.14 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel or otherwise.

3.5.15 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.5.16 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.5.17 Prohibited Interests. Contractor maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Contractor warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement.

Contractor further agrees to file, or shall cause its employees or subcontractors to file, a Statement of Economic Interest with the City’s Filing Officer as required under state law in the performance of the Services. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.5.18 Equal Opportunity Employment. Contractor represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Contractor shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.5.19 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Contractor certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake selfinsurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.5.20 Authority to Enter Agreement. Contractor has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.5.21 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

Page 232 of 484 ends

CA-12

Page 233 of 484 ends

CA-13

3.6 Subcontracting.

3.6.1 Prior Approval Required. Contractor shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.

Name of Contractor: All American Asphalt
*By:
________________________________________________
Signature
________________________________________________
Edward J. Carlson – Vice President
OWNER: CITY OF NORCO, a municipal corporation
*By:
________________________________________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________________________
Colin Burns, City Attorney

Page 234 of 484 ends

CA-14

EXHIBIT A
Scope of Second Street & Rocking R.M. Lane Rehabilitation Project The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals as required by the Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents for the above stated project.

The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of pavement reconstruction, curb & gutter, curb ramp, catch basin, equestrian trail and other improvements on Second Street and Rocking R.M. Lane.

Page 235 of 484 ends

CA-13

EXHIBIT B
Proposal Document

Page 236 of 484 ends

CA-14

CONTRACT PERFORMANCE BOND
(CALIFORNIA PUBLIC WORK)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT:

THAT WHEREAS, the City of Norco (sometimes referred to hereinafter as “Obligee”) has awarded to
___________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________ (hereinafter designated as the “Contractor”), an agreement for the work described as follows:

SECOND STREET & ROCKING R.M. LANE REHABILITATION PROJECT The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

NOW, THEREFORE, we, ____________________________________________, the undersigned Contractor, as Principal, and ____________________________________ ________________________________, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of____________, and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Norco in the sum of ______________________________________________________ Dollars ($ _________________), said sum being not less than 100 percent of the total amount payable by the said Obligee under the terms to the said Contract, for which amount well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if the bounden Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to

Page 237 of 484 ends

CA-15
and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and agreements in the said Contract and any alteration thereof made as therein provided, on his or its parts, to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their intent and meaning; and shall faithfully fulfill the one year guarantee of all materials and workmanship; and indemnify and save harmless the Obligee, its officers and agents, as stipulated in said Contract, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect.

The said Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration of addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work or to the Specifications.

No final settlement between the Obligee and the Contractor shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied.

Contractor and Surety agree that if the Obligee is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with enforcement of the bond, each shall pay Obligee’s reasonable attorney’s fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this ____ day of _________, 2025.

PRINCIPAL/CONTRACTOR:
_________________________________
By: ______________________________
SURETY:
_________________________________
By: ______________________________
Attorney-in-Fact

Page 238 of 484 ends

CA-16
The rate of premium on this bond is _________________________ per thousand.

The total amount of premium charged: $_____________________________________ (The above must be filled in by corporate surety).

IMPORTANT: Surety companies executing bonds must possess a certificate of authority from the California Insurance Commissioner authorizing them to write surety insurance defined in Section 105 of the California Insurance Code, and if the work or project is financed, in whole or in part, with Federal, grant, or loan funds, it must also appear on the Treasury Department’s most current list (Circular 570 as amended). THIS IS A REQUIRED FORM.

Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety) ________________________________ ________________________________
________________________________
(Name and Address of Agent or ________________________________ Representative for service of
process in California if ________________________________ different from above)
________________________________
(Telephone Number of Surety and ________________________________ Agent or Representative for
service of process in California) ________________________________ ________________________________
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

Page 239 of 484 ends

CA-17

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF )
On this ____ day of ___________, in the year _________, before me, ______________________, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared ____________________________, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney-in-Fact of the _________________________ (Surety) and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of the ______________________________ (Surety) thereto and his own name as Attorney-in-Fact.

Notary Public in and for said
State
(SEAL)
Commission expires:______________________________
NOTE:

A copy of the Power of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must be attached hereto.

Page 240 of 484 ends

CA-18

PAYMENT BOND
(CALIFORNIA PUBLIC WORK)
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT:

THAT WHEREAS, the City of Norco (sometimes referred to hereinafter as Obligee” has awarded to ____________________________________________________________ __________________________________(hereinafter designated as the “Contractor”), an agreement dated________________________________, described as follows:

SECOND STREET & ROCKING R.M. LANE REHABILITATION PROJECT The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of:

The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals as required by the Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents for the above stated project. The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of pavement reconstruction, curb & gutter, curb ramp, catch basin, equestrian trail and other improvements on Second Street and Rocking R.M. Lane (hereinafter referred to as the “Contract”) and
WHEREAS, said Contractor is required to furnish a bond in connection with said Contract and pursuant to Section 3247 of the California Civil Code; NOW, THEREFORE, We, _______________________________________________, the undersigned Contractor, as Principal; and
__________________________________
______________________________________________________________________ _
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of __________________, and duly authorized to transact business under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Norco and to any and all persons, companies, or corporations entitled to file stop notices under Section 3181 of the California Civil Code, in the sum of ________________________________________________________________Dollars ($ _________________), said sum being not less than 100 percent of the total amount payable by the said Obligee under the terms of the said Contract, for which payment will and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that, if said Contractor, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, or Subcontractors, shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions or other supplies, implements, machinery, or power used in, upon, for, or about the performance of the Public Work contracted to be done,

Page 241 of 484 ends

CA-19
or to pay any person for any work or labor of any kind, or for bestowing skills or other necessary services thereon, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work or labor, or for any amounts required to be deducted, withheld, and paid over to the Employment Development Department from the wages of employees of paid Contractor and his Subcontractors pursuant to Section 13020 of the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work and labor as required by the provisions of Section 3247 through 3252 of the Civil Code, the Surety or Sureties hereon will pay for the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in this bond, otherwise the above obligation shall be void. In addition to the provisions herein above, it is agreed that this bond will insure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies, and corporations entitled to serve stop notices under Section 3181 of the Civil Code, so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or additions to the terms of the said Contract or to the work to be performed thereunder or the Specifications accompanying the same shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract or to the work or to the Specifications.

No final settlement between the Obligee and the Contractor hereunder shall abridge the right of any beneficiary hereunder, whose claim may be unsatisfied.

Contractor and Surety agree that if the Obligee is required to engage the services of an attorney in connection with the enforcement of this bond, each shall pay Obligee’s reasonable attorney’s fees incurred, with or without suit, in addition to the above sum.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this _____day of_______________, 20__.

PRINCIPAL/CONTRACTOR:
_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
SURETY:
_____________________________________
By: __________________________________
Attorney-in-Fact

Page 242 of 484 ends

CA-20
The rate of premium on this bond is ________________________ per thousand.

The total amount of premium charged: $ _____________________________________ (The above must be filled in by corporate Surety).

Any claims under this bond may be addressed to:
(Name and Address of Surety) _______________________________ _______________________________
_______________________________
(Name and Address of Agent or _______________________________ Representative for service of
process in California if _______________________________ different from above)
_______________________________
(Telephone Number of Surety and _______________________________ Agent or Representative for
service of process in California _______________________________ _______________________________
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

Page 243 of 484 ends

CA-21

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.

COUNTY OF )
On ______________________, before me, __________________________________, personally appeared _________________________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Signature (SEAL)
NOTE:

A copy of the Power of Attorney to local representatives of the bonding company must be attached hereto.

Page 244 of 484 ends

CA-22

GENERAL LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement # ________________________

1. Insurance Company ____________________________________________ Policy Number _____________________

2. Policy Term (From) _______________ (To)________________ Endorsement Effective Date ______________________________________

3. Named Insured _______________________________________________

4. Address of Named Insured
_____________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________

5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate
$______________________________ /_____________________________

6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention (Nil unless otherwise specified):
______________________________________________

7. Coverage is equivalent to:

Comprehensive General Liability Form GL0002 (Ed. 1/73)
______________________________________________
Commercial General Liability “Occurrence” Form CG0001
______________________________________________

8. Bodily Injury and Property Damage Coverage is:
____________________________________”occurrence”
Note: The City of Norco standard insurance requirements specify “occurrence” coverage. “Claims-made” coverage is not acceptable. If commercial general liability form or equivalent is used, the general aggregate must apply separately to this location/project or the general aggregate must be twice the occurrence limit.

Page 245 of 484 ends

CA-23

9. Description of Project:

SECOND STREET & ROCKING R.M. LANE REHABILITATION PROJECT The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor, and incidentals as required by the Plans, Specifications, and Contract Documents for the above stated project. The general items of work to be done hereunder consist of pavement reconstruction, curb & gutter, curb ramp, catch basin, equestrian trail and other improvements on Second Street and Rocking R.M. Lane B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:

1. INSURED. As respects any work performed on the above described Project, the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, and volunteers are included as insured with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: (a) activities performed by or on behalf of the Named Insured, (b) products and completed operations of the Named Insured, or (c) premises owned, leased, or used by the Named Insured.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects: (a) work performed by the Named Insured on the above described Project for or on behalf of the City of Norco; or (b) products sold by the Named Insured to the City of Norco for use on the Project; or (c) premises leased by the Named Insured from the City of Norco, the insurance afforded by this policy shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or volunteers; or stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured’s schedule underlying primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers, or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Form Number GL 0002 (Ed. 1/73), Comprehensive General Liability Insurance and Insurance Services Office form number GL 0404 Broad Form Comprehensive General Liability endorsement; or

Page 246 of 484 ends

CA-24
(2) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Coverage, “Occurrence” Form CG 0001; or
(3) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced in the preceding Sections (1) and (2).

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respects to the Company’s limit of liability.

5. PROVISIONS REGARDING THE INSURED’S DUTIES AFTER ACCIDENT OR LOSS. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policy shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officer, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

6. CANCELLATION NOTICE. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.

C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:

ATTN:
_____________________________________________________________________ (Title) (Department)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Company)
_____________________________________________________________________ (Street Address)
_____________________________________________________________________ (City) (State) (Zip Code)
______________________________
(Telephone Number)

Page 247 of 484 ends

CA-25
D. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, __________________________, warrant that I have authority to (Print/Type Name)
bind the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.
____________________________________________

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original Signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: _____________________________________________________ TITLE: _____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________
TELEPHONE: _____________________________________________________

Page 248 of 484 ends

CA-26

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement #_____________________

1. Insurance Company _____________________________________________ Policy Number _____________________

2. Policy Term (From)________________(To) _______________ Endorsement Effective Date ___________

3. Named Insured________________________________________________

4. Address of Named Insured________________________________________

5. Limit of Liability Any One Occurrence/Aggregate
$______________________ /_____________________________________

6. Deductible or Self-Insured Retention
(Nil unless otherwise specified):
$____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
This endorsement is issued in consideration of the policy premium. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:

1. INSURED. The City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, consulting engineers, employees and volunteers are included as insured with regard to damages and defense of claims arising from: the ownership, operation, maintenance, use, loading or unloading of any auto owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Named Insured, regardless of whether liability is attributable to the Named Insured or a combination of the Named Insured and the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers.

2. CONTRIBUTION NOT REQUIRED. As respects work performed by the Named Insured for or on behalf of the City of Norco, the insurance afforded

Page 249 of 484 ends

CA-27
by this policy shall: (a) be primary insurance as respects the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, consulting engineers or volunteers; or (b) stand in an unbroken chain of coverage excess of the Named Insured’s primary coverage. In either event, any other insurance maintained by the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be in excess of this insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. SCOPE OF COVERAGE. This policy, if primary, affords coverage to the Named Insured at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office form number CA 00001 (Ed. 1/78), Code 1 (“any auto”) and endorsement CA 0025.
(2) If excess, affords coverage which is at least as broad as the primary insurance forms referenced in the preceding Section (1).

4. SEVERABILITY OF INTEREST. The insurance afforded by this policy applies separately to each insured who is seeking coverage, or against whom a claim is made or a suit is brought, except with respect to the Company’s limit of liability.

Page 250 of 484 ends

CA-28
C. INCIDENT AND CLAIM REPORTING PROCEDURE
Incidents and claims are to be reported to the insurer at:

Page 251 of 484 ends

CA-29
WORKER’S COMPENSATION/EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT

CITY OF NORCO
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
(951) 270-5678
A. POLICY INFORMATION Endorsement # ________________________

1. Insurance Company ____________________________________________ (“the Company”)
Policy Number _________________________________________________

2. Effective Date of this Endorsement ________________________________

3. Named Insured_________________________________________________

4. Employer’s Liability Limit (Coverage B)______________________________ _____________________________________________________________ B. POLICY AMENDMENTS
In consideration of the policy premium and notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy to which this endorsement is attached or any other endorsement attached thereto, it is agreed as follows:
(1) Cancellation Notice. The insurance afforded by this policy shall not be suspended, voided, canceled, reduced in coverage or in limits except after 30 days prior written notice by certified mail return receipt requested has been given to the City of Norco. Such notice shall be addressed as shown in the heading of this endorsement.
(2) Waiver of Subrogation. The Insurance Company agrees to waive all rights of subrogation against the City of Norco, its elected or appointed officers, officials, agents and employees for losses paid under the terms of this policy which arise from work performed by the Named Insured for the City of Norco.

Page 252 of 484 ends

CA-30
C. SIGNATURE OF INSURER OR AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

INSURER
I, _______________________, warrant that I have authority to bind (Print/Type Name)
the below-listed insurance company and by my signature hereon do so bind this company.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
(Original signature required on endorsement furnished to the City of Norco) ORGANIZATION: ____________________________________________________ TITLE: ____________________________________________________ ADDRESS: ____________________________________________________ TELEPHONE: ____________________________________________________

Page 253 of 484 ends

CA-31

Page 254 of 484 ends

CA-32

Page 255 of 484 ends

CA-33

Page 256 of 484 ends

CA-34

Page 257 of 484 ends

Page 258 of 484 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 7, 2025 Agenda Item:

3.G.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Prepared By: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Fiscal Year 2024-25 Third Quarter Budget-to-Actual Report RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and File Fiscal Year 2024-25 Third Quarter Budget-to-Actual Report.

SUMMARY:

This report provides a budget-to-actual update of the various operating funds for the Fiscal Year 2024-25 quarter ended March 31, 2025.

BACKGROUND:

This report provides current budget performance financial information on the City’s Operating Budget for various funds through the quarter ended March 31, 2025.

General Fund
Attachment 1 provides the summary of the General Fund budget-to-actual revenues and expenditures using the data available through March 31, 2025. As of March 31, 2025, fifty-eight percent (58%) of the total Fiscal Year approved budget has been expended. This lower than anticipated expenditure rate is due to delays in the submission of invoices for contractual services, especially for Sheriff and CAL Fire services. On the revenue side, sixty-three percent (63%) of the total budgeted revenue has been received as of March 31, 2025. The lower than anticipated revenue rate is also due to a time lag in actual receipt of key revenues such as sales tax, property tax, motor vehicle license fees and franchise fees.

Other Funds
Attachment 2 provides the summary of revenues and expenditures/expenses of all other Operating Funds as of March 31, 2025.

Water Fund

Page 259 of 484 ends

Total Water Fund operating expenses of $8.9 million and Water Fund revenues of $8.7 million through March 31, 2025, are tracking to the budget. The main expense is purchased water.

Sewer Fund
Total Sewer Fund operating revenues of $5.2 million and $4.9 million in operating expenses as of March 31, 2025, appear to be in accordance with the amended budget.

Other Funds
Other miscellaneous operating Funds including CDBG, Recycled Water, Miscellaneous Grant Funds, and Supplemental Law Enforcement are projected to end the year in line with the approved budget with the exception of the Gas Tax and NPDES. Staff will be monitoring the Gas Tax expenditures as revenues come in. Any shortfall in NPDES will be subsidized with the appropriated transfer from the General Fund at year-end.

Landscape Maintenance Districts
Staff presents the quarterly budget to actual reports on the LMDs to help residents better understand how LMD assessment receipts are being expended. Attachment 3 provides a budget to actual comparison of each District’s revenues and expenditures through March 31, 2025.

As of March 31, 2025, the first installment of the annual assessments has been received for each District. Based on the amounts received from the first installment for each of the Districts, staff believes that budgeted revenue numbers would likely be achieved by the end of the fiscal year. Actual expenditure amounts shown for each District represent costs that have been paid through March 31, 2025. These costs are typically lower than actual costs incurred due to the time lag between when services are provided by contractors and the time their invoices are submitted and paid.

Measure R Fund
Total Measure R Fund revenues of $4.9 million and $4.3 million in expenditures as of March 31, 2025. It is important to note that actual expenditures incurred through this date are likely higher than this amount due to the time lag between when work is done and when the City receives invoices and pays for the work. Additionally, appropriations are mostly for capital projects where there is substantial time lag between when a project is approved for funding and when work on the project actually commences.

Projects which are not completed by the end of the fiscal year, will be carried over to next fiscal year along with the previously approved appropriations. Measure R Citizens’ Oversight Committee (COC) reviewed Measure R Third Quarter Budget Performance Report (Attachment 4) at their April 23, 2025, COC meeting.

More complete information, including fund and cash balances, will be provided with the year-end report when all assessment receipts and expenditures for the fiscal year are fully accounted.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This report is for information only.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Page 260 of 484 ends

This item is consistent with StrategicDirection #3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment 1 - General Fund
Attachment 2 - Other Funds
Attachment 3 - LMDs
Attachment 4 - Measure R Staff Report

Page 261 of 484 ends

Attachment 1 Page 1
City of Norco
General Fund Budget to Actual
Third Quarter Budget Performance Ending March 31, 2025
Amended
Adopted Budget 03/31/25 Remaining %
General Fund Budget as of 03/31/25 Actual Budget Achieved

REVENUES
Property Taxes $ 2,902,400 $ 3,134,077 $ 1,692,992 $ 1,441,085 54% Sales Taxes 11,246,200 10,455,400 5,928,549 4,526,851 57% Motor Vehicle License Fees 3,766,300 3,964,856 2,003,420 1,961,436 51% Other Taxes 2,501,700 2,366,419 1,603,702 762,717 68%
Franchise Fees 2,462,600 2,462,600 1,154,601 1,307,999 47% Intergovernmental 75,000 75,000 1,014 73,986 1%
Fines and Penalties 194,000 269,321 173,476 95,845 64%
Interest/Lease Income 2,552,700 1,838,281 1,618,139 220,142 88% Community Development Fees 1,845,200 1,651,176 1,252,101 399,075 76% Community Services/Recreation 912,700 940,690 790,260 150,430 84% Other Revenues 1,330,700 $1,639,882.00 1,429,535 210,347 87% Administrative Overhead/Operating Transfers 1,630,980 1,630,980 1,588,583 42,397 97% Total Revenues $ 31,420,480 $ 30,428,682 $ 19,236,372 $ 11,192,310 63%

EXPENDITURES
Sheriff $ 7,833,000 $ 7,608,000 $ 3,350,622 $ 4,257,378 44% Citizens on Patrol 25,800 25,800 12,515 13,285 49%
Crossing Guards 89,200 89,200 (14,040) 103,240 -16%
Total Sheriff Protection 7,948,000 7,723,000 3,349,097 4,373,903 43% Fire Suppression & EMS (CalFire) 5,581,682 5,331,682 2,652,568 2,679,114 50% Norco Animal Rescue Team 17,500 17,500 8,401 9,099 48%
Total Fire 5,599,182 5,349,182 2,660,969 2,688,213 50%
Recreation Services 1,145,303 998,230 635,382 362,848 64% Special Events 216,850 216,850 173,578 43,272 80%
Youth, Sports & Family Services 518,841 518,841 348,222 170,619 67% Senior Citizens 253,088 253,088 127,094 125,994 50%
Senior-RCTC 59,998 59,998 56,941 3,057 95%
Total Community Services 2,194,080 2,047,007 1,341,217 705,790 66% Animal Services 1,052,530 1,052,530 779,701 272,829 74% Non-Departmental 4,840,640 5,588,360 4,076,057 1,512,303 73% City Clerk 657,675 658,675 420,280 238,395 64%
City Manager 517,000 674,000 494,017 179,983 73%
Communications 377,900 402,900 237,870 165,030 59%
Human Resources 261,100 261,100 160,237 100,863 61%
Economic Development 52,000 52,000 50,000 2,000 96%
Fiscal & Support Services 765,450 608,450 406,211 202,239 67% Total Admin, Econ. Dev & Finance 2,631,125 2,657,125 1,768,615 888,510 67% City Council 109,100 109,100 77,459 31,641 71%
City Attorney 250,000 275,000 183,961 91,039 67%
Total City Council & City Attorney 359,100 384,100 261,420 122,680 68% Engineering 466,100 566,100 299,662 266,438 53%
Inspection 150,000 338,200 231,186 107,014 68%
Parkway Maintenance 440,200 440,200 164,567 275,633 37% Total Public Works & Engineering 1,056,300 1,344,500 695,415 649,085 52% Code Enforcement 453,400 379,120 179,086 200,034 47%
Building & Safety 617,200 655,020 405,165 249,855 62%
Planning 701,300 1,199,660 637,693 561,967 53%
Total Community Development 1,771,900 2,233,800 1,221,944 1,011,856 55% Park Maintenance 1,440,800 1,440,800 944,107 496,693 66% Ingalls Event Center 1,361,600 1,454,600 944,066 510,534 65% Facilities Maintenance 1,118,600 1,367,417 925,239 442,178 68% Total Facilities and Maintenance 3,921,000 4,262,817 2,813,412 1,449,405 66% Total Expenditures $ 31,373,857 $ 32,642,421 $ 18,967,848 $ 13,674,573 58% Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ 46,623 $ (2,213,739) $ 268,524 $ (2,482,263) Page 262 of 484 Attachment 2 Page 1
City of Norco
Schedule of Other Funds Revenues & Expenditures
Third Quarter Budget Performance Ending March 31, 2025
Amended 03/31/25 %
Fund Description Budget Actual Achieved

WATER FUND
Revenues $ 11,872,800 $ 8,659,392 73%
Expenditures 13,664,989 8,900,917 65%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (1,792,189) $ (241,525)

SEWER FUND
Revenues $ 7,230,500 $ 5,236,445 72%
Expenditures 6,910,561 4,940,565 71%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ 319,939 $ 295,880

GAS TAX
Revenues $ 785,570 $ 453,405 58%
Expenditures 780,700 486,559 62%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ 4,870 $ (33,153)

NPDES FUND
Revenues $ 213,000 $ 73,819 35%
Expenditures 169,200 83,649 49%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ 43,800 $ (9,831)
CDBG
Revenues $ 338,741 $ 13,050 4%
Expenditures 279,435 13,835 5%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ 59,306 $ (785)

RECYCLED WATER
Revenues $ 3,000,000 $ - 0%
Expenditures 2,700,000 256,241 9%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ 300,000 $ (256,241)

MISCELLANEOUS GRANTS
Revenues $ 1,191,611 $ 624,560 52%
Expenditures 1,191,611 456,854 38%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ - $ 167,706

SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
Revenues $ 195,000 $ 152,997 78%
Expenditures 195,000 152,997 78%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ - $ -

Page 263 of 484 ends

Attachment 3 Page 1
City of Norco
Schedule of Landscape Maintenance District Revenues & Expenses Third Quarter Budget Performance Ending March 31, 2025
Amended 03/31/25 %
Landscape Maintenance District #1 Budget Actual Achieved Revenues:

LMD #1 Assessments $ 12,813 $ 6,789 53%
Interest Income - (132) NA
Total Revenues $ 12,813 $ 6,657 52%
Expenditures:

Observation $ 4,554 $ 2,340 51%
Water Charges 3,000 2,505 84%
Electricity Charges 50 145 290%
Telephone Charges 300 397 132%
Landscape Maintenance 2,700 1,563 58%
Contractual 2,000 - 0%
Administrative Overhead 540 405 75%
Admin Fees-Property Taxes 111 111 100%
Incidentals 400 - 0%
Fuel 30 - 0%
Total Expenditures $ 13,685 $ 7,467 55%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (872) $ (810)
Fund Balance:

Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2024 $ (6,528)

Page 264 of 484 ends

Attachment 3 Page 2
City of Norco
Schedule of Landscape Maintenance District Revenues & Expenses Third Quarter Budget Performance Ending March 31, 2025
Amended 03/31/25 %
Landscape Maintenance District #2 Budget Actual Achieved Revenues:

LMD #2 Assessments $ 190,802 $ 96,302 50%
Interest Income - (514) NA
Total Revenues $ 190,802 $ 95,788 50%
Expenditures:

Observation $ 22,382 $ 11,702 52%
Water Charges 35,000 24,298 69%
Electricity Charges 2,000 1,162 58%
Landscape Maintenance 96,000 55,873 58%
Contractual 8,500 - 0%
Administrative Overhead 7,340 5,508 75%
Admin Fees-Property Taxes 166 166 100%
Fuel 150 - 0%
Land Improvements - Construction 25,000 2,859 11%
Total Expenditures $ 196,538 $ 101,568 52%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (5,736) $ (5,780)
Fund Balance:

Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2024 $ (11,607)

Page 265 of 484 ends

Attachment 3 Page 3
City of Norco
Schedule of Landscape Maintenance District Revenues & Expenses Third Quarter Budget Performance Ending March 31, 2025
Amended 03/31/25 %
Landscape Maintenance District #3 Budget Actual Achieved Revenues:

LMD #3 Assessments $ 107,002 $ 56,165 52%
Interest Income - (150) NA
Total Revenues $ 107,002 $ 56,015 52%
Expenditures:

Observation $ 17,926 $ 9,362 52%
Water Charges 35,000 25,727 74%
Electricity Charges 1,000 577 58%
Telephone Charges 65 - 0%
Landscape Maintenance 40,000 21,961 55%
Contractual 5,000 - 0%
Administrative Overhead 5,100 3,825 75%
Admin Fees-Property Taxes 117 117 100%
Incidentals 1,000 - 0%
Fuel 100 - 0%
Operating Contingency 1,695 - 0%
Total Expenditures $ 107,003 $ 61,569 58%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (1) $ (5,553)
Fund Balance:

Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2024 $ 5,158

Page 266 of 484 ends

Attachment 3 Page 4
City of Norco
Schedule of Landscape Maintenance District Revenues & Expenses Third Quarter Budget Performance Ending March 31, 2025
Amended 03/31/25 %
Landscape Maintenance District #4 Budget Actual Achieved Revenues:

LMD #4 Assessments $ 533,986 $ 281,731 53%
Interest Income - 4,163 NA
Total Revenues $ 533,986 $ 285,894 54%
Expenditures:

Observation $ 31,296 $ 16,383 52%
Tree Replacement 5,000 - 0%
Water Charges 90,000 69,873 78%
Electricity Charges 8,000 4,315 54%
Telephone Charges 500 375 75%
Landscape Maintenance 320,000 211,231 66%
Contractual 6,000 - 0%
Administrative Overhead 31,500 23,625 75%
Admin Fees-Property Taxes 288 288 100%
Incidentals 5,000 73 1%
Fuel 160 - 0%
Operating Contingency 10,000 41 0%
Land Improvement - Construction 26,251 - 0%
Total Expenditures $ 533,995 $ 326,203 61%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (9) $ (40,309)
Fund Balance:

Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2024 $ 348,852

Page 267 of 484 ends

Attachment 3 Page 5
City of Norco
Schedule of Landscape Maintenance District Revenues & Expenses Third Quarter Budget Performance Ending March 31, 2025
Amended 03/31/25 %
Landscape Maintenance District #5 Budget Actual Achieved Revenues:

LMD #5 Assessments $ 70,989 $ 37,015 52%
Interest Income - 1,169 NA
Total Revenues $ 70,989 $ 38,184 54%
Expenditures:

Observation $ 13,468 $ 7,021 52%
Water Charges 9,000 7,370 82%
Electricity Charges 700 270 39%
Telephone Charges 80 - 0%
Landscape Maintenance 22,000 17,045 77%
Contractual 4,000 - 0%
Administrative Overhead 3,100 2,322 75%
Admin Fees-Property Taxes 105 105 100%
Incidentals 1,000 - 0%
Fuel 80 - 0%
Land Improvement - Construction 40,000 - 0%
Total Expenditures $ 93,533 $ 34,133 36%
Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (22,544) $ 4,050
Fund Balance:

Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2024 $ 85,139

Page 268 of 484 ends

Measure R Citizens' Oversight
Committee

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 23, 2025 Agenda Item:

2.B.

To: Honorable Chair and Committee Members
From: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Prepared By: Daphne Liu, Interim Finance Director
Department: Finance
SUBJECT:

Fiscal Year 2024-25 Third Quarter Measure R Budget Performance Report RECOMMENDATION:

Receive and File the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Third Quarter Measure R Budget Performance Report and recommend transmittal to the City Council.

SUMMARY:

One of the Department’s annual goals is to timely inform the Measure R Citizen’s Committee (“COC”) on actual budget results relative to Measure R’s annual adopted budget. This report provides information on how the Measure R actual financial results through March 31, 2025, compare to the adopted budget. Staff recommends that the COC reviews this report and recommends transmittal to the City Council.

BACKGROUND:

As part of revenue and expenditure reporting and monitoring program, staff provides the COC with quarterly budget performance reports. Attachment A provides Measure R Fund summary data of budget-to-actual revenues and expenditures using the data available through March 31, 2025. This report reflects $4,307,887 or 21% of the total appropriation of $20,560,501 has been spent as of March 31, 2025. However, it is important to note that actual expenditures incurred by this date are likely higher due to a time lag between when work is performed and when the City receives and processes invoices for payment. Additionally, most appropriations are for capital projects, which often experience significant delays between funding approval and the commencement of work.

Total Measure R Fund actual revenues through March 31, 2025, are $4,905,430, representing 59% of the total amended revenue budget of $8,378,000 ($8,128,000 for Measure R sales and use tax and $250,000 for interest income). The Measure R Transactions and Use Tax revenue received reflects sales transactions through January Attachment 4 page 1 of 4

Page 269 of 484 ends

31, 2025 — a total of seven months of receipts. Based on this data, staff estimates that total actual Measure R Transactions and Use Tax revenues will be close to the amended budget amount of $8,378,000.

FISCAL IMPACT:

This report is for information only.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

The Budget Performance Report is consistent with Strategic Direction #3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment 4 page 2 of 4

Page 270 of 484 ends

Attachment A
FY 2024-25
Approved Budget
FY 2024-25
Amended Budget
FY 2024-25
Actual as of
03/31/25
% of
Budget
Budget
Remaining
Revenues
Estimated Measure R Tax Revenues $ 8,463,000 $ 8,128,000 $ 4,655,851 57% $ 3,472,149 Investment Earnings 250,000 250,000 195,993 78% 54,007
Misc Revenue - - 53,586 100% (53,586)
Total Revenues $ 8,713,000 $ 8,378,000 $ 4,905,430 59% $ 3,472,570 Expenditures
Operating and Maintenance
Committee Stipends $ 1,400 $ 1,400 $ 300 21% $ 1,100
Professional Services 10,000 10,000 5,950 60% 4,050
Trail System Maintenance 650,000 679,000 344,863 51% 334,137 Subtotal 661,400 690,400 351,113 51% 339,287
Measure R Capital Projects
Facilities and Information Technology Improvements
City Hall Remodel - Efficiency Assessment $ 40,000 $ 56,667 $ 9,168 16% $ 47,499 City Hall/Sheriff Sub-Station Improvements 600,000 568,615 183,747 32% 384,868 Citywide ADA Improvement Project 170,000 193,739 31,580 16% 162,159 Facilities and Maintenance Office 400,000 650,000 - 0% 650,000 HVAC System Replacement 650,000 692,915 48,718 7% 644,197 Ingalls Event Center Camera System 300,000 300,000 87,481 29% 212,519 Ingalls Event Center Wayfinding Project 140,000 152,000 648 0% 151,352 Moreno Arena Bleacher Repairs 762,000 1,539,736 1,411,889 92% 127,847 Moreno Arena Bucking Chute System 100,000 100,000 68,500 69% 31,500 Moreno Arena Emergency Bleacher Lighting 235,000 240,240 - 0% 240,240 NPDS - Back Lot & Trash Bins 270,000 269,427 209,069 78% 60,358 Security System Upgrade 75,000 58,237 17,983 31% 40,254 Senior Center Emergency Generator 250,000 318,926 311,431 98% 7,495 Structured Connectivity System 35,000 35,000 - 0% 35,000 The Nellie Weaver Hall Improvements 356,213 301,857 22,466 7% 279,391 Land Improvements
Animal Control, Parmenter & Wayne Makin Parking Lots 600,000 449,316 140,211 31% 309,105 Park Improvements
Citywide Park Enhancements 200,000 301,495 92,751 31% 208,744 Community Service & Facilities Assessment 122,000 163,915 11,460 7% 152,455 Parking Lot Slurry Seal Project 50,000 50,000 - 0% 50,000 Pikes Peak Park ADA Synthetic Poured In Place Project 830,000 830,000 1,134 0% 828,866 Veterans Memorial Landscaping Project 60,000 60,000 5,125 9% 54,875 Park Light post Replacement & Repair 150,000 150,000 2,070 1% 147,930 Street Improvements
Center Ave - Sixth St to Seventh St. 100,000 118,664 30,110 25% 88,554 Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrade Project 120,000 125,996 119,623 95% 6,373 Drainpac Curb Intels - Temescal Ave, Sixth St to Seventh St - 126,536 13,016 10% 113,520 Fifth Street - Temescal Ave to I-15 Fwy 62,000 40,235 27,314 68% 12,921 Fourth Street - Corona Ave to I-15 Fwy 1,875,000 1,879,348 - 0% 1,879,348 Hillside Ave - Sixth St. to Seventh St. 110,000 101,382 78,128 77% 23,255 Hillside Ave - Third St. to Fourth St. 150,000 164,159 110,434 67% 53,725 Norco Park-N-Ride - 87,000 45,630 52% 41,370
Second St Pavement Project - Mountain Ave to Pacific Ave - 894 - 0% 894 Second Street Pavement Project - East Side - 162,862 - 0% 162,862 Second Street Pavement Project - River to Pacific Ave 2,000,000 1,969,019 619 0% 1,968,400 Temescal Ave - Fifth St. to Sixth St. 20,000 26,975 490 2% 26,485 Temescal Ave Tree Planting 120,000 120,000 84,985 71% 35,015 Third Street Pavement Project - Valley View to College 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,477 0% 1,098,523 Traffic Signal Management & Safety Upgrade - 330,000 - 0% 330,000 Valley View Ave - Fifth St. to Sixth St. 1,950,000 1,970,000 85,276 4% 1,884,724 Valley View Ave - Third St. to Fourth St. 2,100,000 2,103,890 599,790 29% 1,504,100 Woodward Ave Pavement Project 1,100,000 1,100,000 2,520 0% 1,097,480 Trails Improvements
Silverlakes Causeway 250,000 261,056 363 0% 260,694
Trail Fencing Replacement for FY 24-25 600,000 600,000 101,569 17% 498,431 Subtotal $ 18,052,213 $ 19,870,101 $ 3,956,774 20% $ 15,913,327 Total Expenditures $ 18,713,613 $ 20,560,501 $ 4,307,887 21% $ 16,252,614 Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures $ (12,182,501)
Beginning Fund Balance July 1, 2024 12,491,173
Estimated Ending Fund Balance June 30, 2025 $ 308,672
Measure R Transactions and Use Tax
FY 2024-25 3rd Quarter Budget to Actual Report
Attachment 4 page 3 of 4

Page 271 of 484 ends

Attachment B
Projects
Project
Number
Total Approved
Budget
FY 2024-25
Approved
Budget
Expenditures as
of 06/30/24
FY 2024-25
Actual as of
3/31/25
Cumulative
Expenditures as
of 03/31/25
Budget
Remaining
Measure R Capital Projects
Facilities and Information Technology Improvements
City Hall Remodel - Efficiency Assessment 54303.10 $ 100,000 $ 56,667 $ 43,333 $ 9,168 $ 52,501 $ 47,499 City Hall/Sheriff Sub-Station Improvements 54303,2 766,403 568,615 197,788 183,747 381,535 384,868 Citywide ADA Improvement Project 54300.2 509,398 193,739 315,659 31,580 347,239 162,159 Facilities and Maintenance Office 54303.11 650,000 650,000 - - - 650,000 HVAC System Replacement 54303.15 700,000 692,915 7,085 48,718 55,802 644,198 Ingalls Event Center Camera System 54410.10 300,000 301,857 - 22,466 22,466 277,534 Ingalls Event Center Wayfinding Project 54303.16 152,000 300,000 - 87,481 87,481 64,519 Moreno Arena Bleacher Repairs 54111.9 1,562,000 152,000 22,265 648 22,913 1,539,088 Moreno Arena Bucking Chute System 54303.20 100,000 240,240 - - - 100,000 Moreno Arena Emergency Bleacher Lighting 54111.5 250,000 1,539,736 9,760 1,411,889 1,421,649 (1,171,649) NPDS - Back Lot & Trash Bins 4414.3 270,000 269,427 573 209,069 209,643 60,358 Security System Upgrade 54303.12 110,001 58,237 51,764 17,983 69,747 40,254 Senior Center Emergency Generator 54303.17 345,000 318,926 26,074 311,431 337,504 7,496 Structured Connectivity System 54303.19 35,000 35,000 - - - 35,000 The Nellie Weaver Hall Improvements 54303.6 553,810 100,000 251,953 68,500 320,453 233,357 Land Improvements
Animal Control, Parmenter & Wayne Makin Parking Lots 54111.2 600,000 449,316 150,684 140,211 290,895 309,105 Park Improvements
Citywide Park Enhancements 54410.5 610,642 301,495 309,147 92,751 401,898 208,744 Community Service & Facilities Assessment 54303.14 226,000 163,915 62,085 11,460 73,545 152,455 Park Light post Replacement & Repair 54410.7 150,000 150,000 - 2,070 2,070 147,930 Parking Lot Slurry Seal Project 54410.8 50,000 60,000 - 5,125 5,125 44,875 Pikes Peak Park ADA Synthetic Poured In Place Project 4407.8 830,000 50,000 - - - 830,000 Veterans Memorial Landscaping Project 54410.9 60,000 830,000 - 1,134 1,134 58,866 Street Improvements
Center Ave - Sixth St to Seventh St. 54900.27 120,000 125,996 1,336 119,623 120,959 (959) Citywide Traffic Signal Upgrade Project 54900.22 200,000 118,664 74,004 30,110 104,114 95,886 Drainpac Curb Intel's - Temescal Ave, Sixth St to Seventh St 4928.37 1,924,700 126,536 1,798,164 13,016 1,811,180 113,520 Fifth Street - Temescal Ave to I-15 Fwy 54900.23 162,000 40,235 121,765 27,314 149,079 12,921 Fourth Street - Corona Ave to I-15 Fwy 54900.24 1,890,000 1,879,348 10,652 - 10,652 1,879,348 Hillside Ave - Sixth St. to Seventh St. 54900.31 110,000 101,382 8,618 78,128 86,745 23,255 Hillside Ave - Third St. to Fourth St. 54900.28 170,000 164,159 5,841 110,434 116,275 53,725 Norco Park-N-Ride 54900.32 87,000 1,100,000 - 2,520 2,520 84,480 Second St Pavement Project - Mountain Ave to Pacific Ave 4928.25 227,000 894 226,106 - 226,106 894 Second Street Pavement Project - East Side 54900.6 1,300,000 87,000 1,137,138 45,630 1,182,768 117,232 Second Street Pavement Project - River to Pacific Ave 54900.25 2,116,000 162,862 146,981 - 146,981 1,969,019 Temescal Ave - Fifth St. to Sixth St. 54900.29 121,000 1,969,019 94,025 619 94,644 26,356 Temescal Ave Tree Planting 4108.8 120,000 26,975 - 490 490 119,510 Third Street Pavement Project - Valley View to College 54900.26 1,175,000 120,000 75,000 84,985 159,985 1,015,015 Traffic Signal Management & Safety Upgrade 54900.33 330,000 1,100,000 - 1,477 1,477 328,523 Valley View Ave - Fifth St. to Sixth St. 54900.30 1,970,000 1,970,000 - 85,276 85,276 1,884,724 Valley View Ave - Third St. to Fourth St. 54900.1 2,247,161 330,000 143,271 - 143,271 2,103,890 Woodward Ave Pavement Project 54900.19 1,141,440 2,103,890 41,440 599,790 641,230 500,210 Trails Improvements
Silverlakes Causeway 54600.1 270,218 261,056 9,163 363 9,525 260,694 Trail Fencing Replacement for FY 24-25 54600.8 600,000 600,000 - 101,569 101,569 498,431 Total Expenditures $ 25,211,773 $ 19,870,101 $ 5,341,674 $ 3,956,774 $ 9,298,448 $ 15,913,327 Measure R Transactions and Use Tax
FY 2024-25 3rd Quarter Project Life-to-Date Status
Attachment 4 page 4 of 4

Page 272 of 484 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 7, 2025 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Sam Nelson, Interim Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sam Nelson, Interim Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Rate Adjustments Proposed by Waste Management for Fiscal Year 2025-26 RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution No. 2025-12, approving Waste Management Annual Rate Adjustment for FY 2025-26
SUMMARY:

The current Franchise Agreement provides that Waste Management is entitled to receive yearly rate adjustments for inflation based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

The change in the CIP for the 12-month period is 4.44%. However, per the City's franchise agreement with Waste Management, the CPI percentage increase cannot exceed 4%. Therefore, Waste Management has requested that a 4% increase be applied to all service components and ancillary fees effective July 1, 2025 (See Waste Management 2025-26 Rate Exhibit).

BACKGROUND:

The current Franchise Agreement between the City and Waste Management was executed on March 6, 2024 and became effective July 1, 2024. The ten-year term of the Agreement will expire in the year 2034. The Agreement provides that the franchisee is entitled to adjust rates on an annual basis to cover increased costs due to inflation based on increases in the CPI. The CPI to be used in such adjustment shall be the series CUSR0000SEHG02, Garbage and trash collection in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, seasonally adjusted. The Maximum Service Rates shall be adjusted based on one hundred percent (100%) of the 12-month average change in the CPI for the 12- month period published immediately prior to the rate application (average of the CPI from January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024). The average change in the CIP for the 12-month period is 4.44%. However, per the City's franchise agreement with Waste Management, the CPI percentage increase cannot exceed 4%.

Page 273 of 484 ends

Waste Management submitted its proposed rate adjustments in its letter dated February 26, 2025 (see 2025 Annual Rate Adjustment Request). The proposed rates reflect a 4% CPI.

Therefore, staff is recommending that City Council approve Resolution 2025-12 in order to implement Waste Management's fiscal year 2025-26 rate adjustment of 4%.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Franchise fee revenue under General Fund account number 121.000.52115 and vehicle impact fee revenue under Street Improvement Fund account number 149.000.57501 will increase by 4%, which is approximately $38,900 and $35,300, respectively.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

The Waste Management Rate Adjustments are consistent with Strategic Direction #3 - "Assure financial stability by identifying new revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
2025 Annual Rate Adjustment Request Letter
Waste Management Rate Exhibit 2025-26
Dec 2024 Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Resolution 2025-XX_Rate Adjustment by Waste Management

Page 274 of 484 ends

EXHIBIT B

Page 275 of 484 ends

Proposed 2025-26 City of Norco Service Rates
Basic Service Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change
Standard Single-Family Automated Cart Service 64G, 96G $ 33.41 $ 34.74 3.98% Standard Single-Family Automated Cart Service 35G $ 30.14 $ 31.34 3.98% Senior / Low-Income Cart Service 96G $ 30.14 $ 31.34 3.98% Senior / Low-Income Cart Service 64G $ 29.40 $ 30.57 3.98% Senior / Low-Income Cart Service 35G $ 26.46 $ 27.51 3.97% Other Residential Services % Change
Cart Exchange (over 1 per year) $ 21.00 $ 21.84 4.00%
Recycle Contamination Fee (After 2 notices in any 12 months period) $ 34.91 $ 36.30 3.98% Additional 95G-96G or 64G Trash Cart $ 15.64 $ 16.26 3.96% Additional 95G-96G or 64G Green waste Cart (Applies for second additional) $ 15.64 $ 16.26 3.96% Additional 95G-96G or 64G Recycling Cart (Applies for second additional) $ 8.14 $ 8.46 3.93% New Service Set Up Fee $ 15.00 $ 15.60 4.00%
Cart Delivery (for extra cart) $ 10.00 $ 10.40 4.00%
Overage Fee $ 29.00 $ 30.16 4.00%
Cart Removal $ 4.00 $ 4.16 4.00%
Restart Fee $ 58.00 $ 60.32 4.00%
Late Fee / Customer assisted payment $ 5.00 $ 5.20 4.00% Kitchen Food Pail (Second within the same calendar year) $ 16.75 $ 17.42 4.00% Damaged/Destroyed Cart At Cost At Cost
Multi-Family Dwelling Trash (Includes bundled rates that include 96-Gallon Recycling and 64-Gallon Organic Waste) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Residential Curbside 64G, 96G $ 33.41 $ 34.74 3.98%
2CY Bin 1X Week $ 132.26 $ 137.55 4.00%
2CY Bin 2X Week $ 264.53 $ 275.11 4.00%
2CY Bin 3X Week $ 396.79 $ 412.66 4.00%
2CY Bin 4X Week $ 529.04 $ 550.20 4.00%
2CY Bin 5X Week $ 661.30 $ 687.75 4.00%
2CY Bin 6X Week $ 793.57 $ 825.31 4.00%
Extra PU $ 68.30 $ 71.03 4.00%
3CY Bin 1X Week $ 182.26 $ 189.55 4.00%
3CY Bin 2X Week $ 364.52 $ 379.10 4.00%
3CY Bin 3X Week $ 546.77 $ 568.64 4.00%
3CY Bin 4X Week $ 729.02 $ 758.18 4.00%
3CY Bin 5X Week $ 911.26 $ 947.71 4.00%
3CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,093.51 $ 1,137.25 4.00%
Extra PU $ 89.92 $ 93.52 4.00%
4CY Bin 1X Week $ 243.01 $ 252.73 4.00%
4CY Bin 2X Week $ 486.02 $ 505.46 4.00%
4CY Bin 3X Week $ 729.03 $ 758.19 4.00%
4CY Bin 4X Week $ 972.05 $ 1,010.93 4.00%
4CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,215.06 $ 1,263.66 4.00%
4CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,458.07 $ 1,516.39 4.00%
Extra PU $ 119.89 $ 124.69 4.00%
6CY Bin 1X Week $ 332.02 $ 345.30 4.00%
6CY Bin 2X Week $ 664.08 $ 690.64 4.00%
6CY Bin 3X Week $ 996.12 $ 1,035.96 4.00%
6CY Bin 4X Week $ 1,328.14 $ 1,381.27 4.00%
6CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,660.17 $ 1,726.58 4.00%
6CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,992.23 $ 2,071.92 4.00%
Extra PU $ 168.32 $ 175.05 4.00%
Residential Service
Multi-Family Dwelling Services

EXHIBIT A

Page 276 of 484 ends

Proposed 2025-26 City of Norco Service Rates
Multi-Family Dwelling Recycling Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Residential Curbside 64G, 96G $ 26.46 $ 27.51 3.97%
2CY Bin 1X Week $ 94.23 $ 98.00 4.00%
2CY Bin 2X Week $ 188.45 $ 195.99 4.00%
2CY Bin 3X Week $ 282.68 $ 293.99 4.00%
2CY Bin 4X Week $ 376.90 $ 391.98 4.00%
2CY Bin 5X Week $ 471.13 $ 489.98 4.00%
2CY Bin 6X Week $ 565.35 $ 587.96 4.00%
Extra PU $ 53.40 $ 55.53 3.99%
3CY Bin 1X Week $ 125.65 $ 130.68 4.00%
3CY Bin 2X Week $ 251.17 $ 261.22 4.00%
3CY Bin 3X Week $ 376.85 $ 391.92 4.00%
3CY Bin 4X Week $ 502.61 $ 522.71 4.00%
3CY Bin 5X Week $ 628.16 $ 653.29 4.00%
3CY Bin 6X Week $ 751.62 $ 781.68 4.00%
Extra PU $ 74.43 $ 77.41 4.00%
4CY Bin 1X Week $ 167.52 $ 174.22 4.00%
4CY Bin 2X Week $ 335.02 $ 348.42 4.00%
4CY Bin 3X Week $ 502.56 $ 522.66 4.00%
4CY Bin 4X Week $ 670.07 $ 696.87 4.00%
4CY Bin 5X Week $ 837.59 $ 871.09 4.00%
4CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,005.09 $ 1,045.29 4.00%
Extra PU $ 99.24 $ 103.21 4.00%
6CY Bin 1X Week $ 218.27 $ 227.00 4.00%
6CY Bin 2X Week $ 436.81 $ 454.28 4.00%
6CY Bin 3X Week $ 655.10 $ 681.30 4.00%
6CY Bin 4X Week $ 873.52 $ 908.46 4.00%
6CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,082.58 $ 1,125.88 4.00%
6CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,315.99 $ 1,368.63 4.00%
Extra PU $ 137.53 $ 143.03 4.00%
Multi-Family Dwelling Organic Waste (Green Waste and Food Waste) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 1X Week $ 55.90 $ 58.13 3.99% Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 2X Week $ 111.06 $ 115.50 4.00% Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 3X Week $ 166.22 $ 172.87 4.00% Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 4X Week $ 221.37 $ 230.22 4.00% Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 5X Week $ 276.53 $ 287.59 4.00% 2CY Bin 1X Week $ 306.72 $ 318.99 4.00%
2CY Bin 2X Week $ 613.45 $ 637.99 4.00%
2CY Bin 3X Week $ 920.22 $ 957.03 4.00%
2CY Bin 4X Week $ 1,226.93 $ 1,276.01 4.00%
2CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,533.66 $ 1,595.01 4.00%
2CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,840.40 $ 1,914.02 4.00%
Extra PU $ 72.17 $ 75.06 4.00%
Multi-Family Dwelling Yard Waste Only (If applicable) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Residential Curbside 64G, 96G $ 36.47 $ 37.93 4.00%
2CY Bin 1X Week $ 230.18 $ 239.39 4.00%
2CY Bin 2X Week $ 460.36 $ 478.77 4.00%
2CY Bin 3X Week $ 690.57 $ 718.19 4.00%
2CY Bin 4X Week $ 920.71 $ 957.54 4.00%
2CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,150.92 $ 1,196.96 4.00%

Page 277 of 484 ends

Proposed 2025-26 City of Norco Service Rates
Service Description Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Manure Collection 64G, 96G $ 31.49 $ 32.75 4.00%
Manure Collection 2CY 1X Week $ 142.04 $ 147.72 4.00%
Manure Collection 2CY 2X Week $ 267.69 $ 278.40 4.00%
Manure Collection 2CY 3X Week $ 388.99 $ 404.55 4.00%
Manure Collection 2CY 4X Week $ 510.28 $ 530.69 4.00%
Manure Collection 2CY 5X Week $ 631.60 $ 656.86 4.00%
Manure Collection Every Other Week $ 94.61 $ 98.39 4.00% Manure Extra PU $ 56.07 $ 58.31 4.00%
Manure Scout Service 1X Week $ - $ -
Manure Scout Service 2X Week $ - $ -
Manure Scout Service 3X Week $ - $ -
Manure Scout Service 4X Week $ - $ -
Manure Scout Service 5X Week $ - $ -
Manure Scout Service Every Other Week $ - $ -
Manure Scout Service Extra PU $ - $ -
Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 25 feet 1X Week $ 16.70 $ 17.36 3.95% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 25 feet 2X Week $ 33.40 $ 34.73 3.98% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 25 feet 3X Week $ 50.10 $ 52.10 3.99% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 25 feet 4X Week $ 66.80 $ 69.47 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 25 feet 5X Week $ 83.50 $ 86.84 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 25 feet 6X Week $ 100.20 $ 104.21 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 50 feet 1X Week $ 33.40 $ 34.73 3.98% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 50 feet 2X Week $ 66.80 $ 69.47 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 50 feet 3X Week $ 100.20 $ 104.21 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 50 feet 4X Week $ 133.60 $ 138.94 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 50 feet 5X Week $ 167.00 $ 173.68 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 50 feet 6X Week $ 200.40 $ 208.42 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 75 feet 1X Week $ 50.10 $ 52.10 3.99% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 75 feet 2X Week $ 100.20 $ 104.21 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 75 feet 3X Week $ 150.30 $ 156.31 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 75 feet 4X Week $ 200.40 $ 208.42 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 75 feet 5X Week $ 250.50 $ 260.52 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 75 feet 6X Week $ 300.60 $ 312.62 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 100 feet 1X Week $ 66.80 $ 69.47 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 100 feet 2X Week $ 133.60 $ 138.94 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 100 feet 3X Week $ 200.40 $ 208.42 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 100 feet 4X Week $ 267.20 $ 277.89 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 100 feet 5X Week $ 334.00 $ 347.36 4.00% Residential & Commercial Push Rate - 100 feet 6X Week $ 400.80 $ 416.83 4.00% Split Bin (1.5 CY Trash, 1.5CY Recycling (Space constrains customers only) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change 3CY Split Bin 1X Week $ 179.03 $ 186.19 4.00%
3CY Split Bin 2X Week $ 358.07 $ 372.39 4.00%
3CY Split Bin 3X Week $ 537.11 $ 558.59 4.00%
3CY Split Bin 4X Week $ 716.14 $ 744.79 4.00%
3CY Split Bin 5X Week $ 895.15 $ 930.96 4.00%
Other Services Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change
Extra Pickup 64G Organics Waste $ 12.74 $ 13.25 4.00%
Extra Pickup 2CY Organics Waste $ 70.71 $ 73.54 4.00%
Temporary Bin Service 3CY $ 318.68 $ 331.43 4.00%
Bulky Waste Residential (Over 3 per year) per pickup $ 33.00 $ 34.32 4.00% Additional Services

Page 278 of 484 ends

Proposed 2025-26 City of Norco Service Rates
Roll-off Pull Rates (Roll-Off Containers billed on a per pull plus Disposal Fee) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change 10 CY Container Per Pull $ 338.66 $ 352.21 4.00%
20 CY Container Per Pull $ 338.66 $ 352.21 4.00%
30 CY Container Per Pull $ 338.66 $ 352.21 4.00%
40 CY Container Per Pull $ 338.66 $ 352.21 4.00%
Inactivity Fee $ 318.90 $ 331.66 4.00%
Setup Fee $ 38.00 $ 39.52 4.00%
*Commercial Bundled Service Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Commercial MSW Rate 3CY 1X Week $ 182.26 $ 189.55 4.00% Commercial 96G Recycling 1X Week $ - $ -
Commercial 64G Organic 1X Week $ - $ -
Total Bundled Rate $ 182.26 $ 189.55 4.00%
Commercial Trash (Includes bundled rate that include 1x/week collection of 96- Gallon Recycling and 64-Gallon Organic Waste) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Commercial Cart Service 64G, 96G $ 41.95 $ 43.63 4.00%
2CY Bin 1X Week $ 132.26 $ 137.55 4.00%
2CY Bin 2X Week $ 264.53 $ 275.11 4.00%
2CY Bin 3X Week $ 396.79 $ 412.66 4.00%
2CY Bin 4X Week $ 529.04 $ 550.20 4.00%
2CY Bin 5X Week $ 661.30 $ 687.75 4.00%
2CY Bin 6X Week $ 793.57 $ 825.31 4.00%
Extra PU $ 63.80 $ 66.35 4.00%
3CY Bin 1X Week $ 182.26 $ 189.55 4.00%
3CY Bin 2X Week $ 364.52 $ 379.10 4.00%
3CY Bin 3X Week $ 546.77 $ 568.64 4.00%
3CY Bin 4X Week $ 729.02 $ 758.18 4.00%
3CY Bin 5X Week $ 911.26 $ 947.71 4.00%
3CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,093.51 $ 1,137.25 4.00%
Extra PU $ 89.92 $ 93.52 4.00%
4CY Bin 1X Week $ 243.01 $ 252.73 4.00%
4CY Bin 2X Week $ 486.02 $ 505.46 4.00%
4CY Bin 3X Week $ 729.03 $ 758.19 4.00%
4CY Bin 4X Week $ 972.05 $ 1,010.93 4.00%
4CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,215.06 $ 1,263.66 4.00%
4CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,458.07 $ 1,516.39 4.00%
Extra PU $ 119.89 $ 124.69 4.00%
6CY Bin 1X Week $ 332.02 $ 345.30 4.00%
6CY Bin 2X Week $ 664.08 $ 690.64 4.00%
6CY Bin 3X Week $ 996.12 $ 1,035.96 4.00%
6CY Bin 4X Week $ 1,328.14 $ 1,381.27 4.00%
6CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,660.17 $ 1,726.58 4.00%
6CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,992.23 $ 2,071.92 4.00%
Extra PU $ 168.32 $ 175.05 4.00%
Commercial Services
Roll-off Containers billed one per pull plus process or disposal rate

Page 279 of 484 ends

Proposed 2025-26 City of Norco Service Rates
Commercial Recycling Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Residential Curbside 64G, 96G $ 26.46 $ 27.51 3.97%
2CY Bin 1X Week $ 94.23 $ 98.00 4.00%
2CY Bin 2X Week $ 188.45 $ 195.99 4.00%
2CY Bin 3X Week $ 282.68 $ 293.99 4.00%
2CY Bin 4X Week $ 376.90 $ 391.98 4.00%
2CY Bin 5X Week $ 471.13 $ 489.98 4.00%
2CY Bin 6X Week $ 565.35 $ 587.96 4.00%
Extra PU $ 53.40 $ 55.53 3.99%
3CY Bin 1X Week $ 125.65 $ 130.68 4.00%
3CY Bin 2X Week $ 251.17 $ 261.22 4.00%
3CY Bin 3X Week $ 376.85 $ 391.92 4.00%
3CY Bin 4X Week $ 502.61 $ 522.71 4.00%
3CY Bin 5X Week $ 628.16 $ 653.29 4.00%
3CY Bin 6X Week $ 751.62 $ 781.68 4.00%
Extra PU $ 74.43 $ 77.41 4.00%
4CY Bin 1X Week $ 167.52 $ 174.22 4.00%
4CY Bin 2X Week $ 335.02 $ 348.42 4.00%
4CY Bin 3X Week $ 502.56 $ 522.66 4.00%
4CY Bin 4X Week $ 670.07 $ 696.87 4.00%
4CY Bin 5X Week $ 837.59 $ 871.09 4.00%
4CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,005.09 $ 1,045.29 4.00%
Extra PU $ 99.24 $ 103.21 4.00%
6CY Bin 1X Week $ 218.27 $ 227.00 4.00%
6CY Bin 2X Week $ 436.81 $ 454.28 4.00%
6CY Bin 3X Week $ 655.10 $ 681.30 4.00%
6CY Bin 4X Week $ 873.52 $ 908.46 4.00%
6CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,082.58 $ 1,125.88 4.00%
6CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,315.99 $ 1,368.63 4.00%
Extra PU $ 137.53 $ 143.03 4.00%
Commercial Yard Waste Only (If applicable) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Residential Curbside 64G, 96G $ 36.47 $ 37.93 4.00%
2CY Bin 1X Week $ 230.18 $ 239.39 4.00%
2CY Bin 2X Week $ 460.36 $ 478.77 4.00%
2CY Bin 3X Week $ 690.57 $ 718.19 4.00%
2CY Bin 4X Week $ 920.71 $ 957.54 4.00%
2CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,150.92 $ 1,196.96 4.00%
Commercial Organic Waste (Green Waste and Food Waste) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 1X Week $ 55.90 $ 58.13 3.99% Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 2X Week $ 111.06 $ 115.50 4.00% Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 3X Week $ 166.22 $ 172.87 4.00% Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 4X Week $ 221.37 $ 230.22 4.00% Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 5X Week $ 276.53 $ 287.59 4.00% Residential Curbside 64G, 96G 6X Week $ 331.69 $ 344.96 4.00% 2CY Bin 1X Week $ 306.72 $ 318.99 4.00%
2CY Bin 2X Week $ 613.45 $ 637.99 4.00%
2CY Bin 3X Week $ 920.22 $ 957.03 4.00%
2CY Bin 4X Week $ 1,226.93 $ 1,276.01 4.00%
2CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,533.66 $ 1,595.01 4.00%
2CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,840.40 $ 1,914.02 4.00%
Extra PU $ 70.71 $ 73.54 4.00%

Page 280 of 484 ends

Proposed 2025-26 City of Norco Service Rates
Commercial Trash for Organic Waste Exempt Customers (Includes 96-Gallon Recycling Cart and no Organic Waste) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Residential Curbside 64G, 96G $ 33.41 $ 34.74 3.98%
2CY Bin 1X Week $ 121.35 $ 126.20 4.00%
2CY Bin 2X Week $ 257.71 $ 268.02 4.00%
2CY Bin 3X Week $ 374.43 $ 389.41 4.00%
2CY Bin 4X Week $ 503.99 $ 524.15 4.00%
2CY Bin 5X Week $ 633.55 $ 658.89 4.00%
2CY Bin 6X Week $ 763.12 $ 793.64 4.00%
3CY Bin 1X Week $ 170.81 $ 177.64 4.00%
3CY Bin 2X Week $ 342.83 $ 356.54 4.00%
3CY Bin 3X Week $ 521.36 $ 542.21 4.00%
3CY Bin 4X Week $ 699.88 $ 727.88 4.00%
3CY Bin 5X Week $ 878.40 $ 913.54 4.00%
3CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,056.93 $ 1,099.21 4.00%
4CY Bin 1X Week $ 235.52 $ 244.94 4.00%
4CY Bin 2X Week $ 461.85 $ 480.32 4.00%
4CY Bin 3X Week $ 699.89 $ 727.89 4.00%
4CY Bin 4X Week $ 937.95 $ 975.47 4.00%
4CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,176.00 $ 1,223.04 4.00%
4CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,414.05 $ 1,470.61 4.00%
6CY Bin 1X Week $ 327.28 $ 340.37 4.00%
6CY Bin 2X Week $ 636.27 $ 661.72 4.00%
6CY Bin 3X Week $ 961.54 $ 1,000.00 4.00%
6CY Bin 4X Week $ 1,286.79 $ 1,338.26 4.00%
6CY Bin 5X Week $ 1,556.69 $ 1,618.96 4.00%
6CY Bin 6X Week $ 1,937.32 $ 2,014.81 4.00%
Compactor Haul Rates (Compactor Containers billed on a per pull plus Disposal Fee) Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change 2CY Compactor $ 291.55 $ 303.21 4.00%
Extra Collection $ 191.39 $ 199.05 4.00%
3CY Compactor $ 410.76 $ 427.19 4.00%
Extra Collection $ 269.76 $ 280.55 4.00%
4CY Compactor $ 547.69 $ 569.60 4.00%
Extra Collection $ 259.68 $ 270.07 4.00%
6CY Compactor $ 595.00 $ 618.80 4.00%
Extra Collection $ 504.98 $ 525.18 4.00%

Page 281 of 484 ends

Proposed 2025-26 City of Norco Service Rates
Additional Services
Service Description Current Rate Proposed Rate % Change Lock Bin, Lock on Gate (Monthly) $ 19.00 $ 19.76 4.00%
Trip Charge / Dry Run Commercial and Roll off / Delivery / Relocation (Per occurrence) $ 106.63 $ 110.90 4.00% Setup Fee (Per occurrence) $ 36.00 $ 37.44 4.00%
Delivery Charge Commercial Carts (Per occurrence) $ 15.00 $ 15.60 4.00% Bin Exchange Fee (Over 1 per year) (Per occurrence) $ 75.00 $ 78.00 4.00% Recycling Contamination Fee (Per occurrence) $ 91.39 $ 95.05 4.00% Overage Fee (Per occurrence) $ 75.00 $ 78.00 4.00%
Commercial Manure Collection 64G (Weekly) $ 31.49 $ 32.75 4.00% Commercial Manure Collection 2CY Bin (Weekly) $ 142.04 $ 147.72 4.00% Commercial Manure Collection 2CY Every other Week (Per occurrence) $ 94.61 $ 98.39 4.00% Commercial Manure Scout Service (Per occurrence) $ - $ - Commercial Manure Scout Service second bin same day (Per occurrence) $ - $ - Bulky Commercial Fee (Per occurrence) $ 50.00 $ 52.00 4.00% Additional Sharps Kit (After 1 per year for Standard Service and after 2 per year for Senior) $ 50.00 $ 52.00 4.00% Bin Cleaning Fee (After 1 per year) (Per occurrence) $ 48.00 $ 49.92 4.00% Damaged/Destroyed Bin (Per occurrence) At Cost At Cost
Scout for Non Manure Customers
Non-Manure Scout Service 1X Week $ 48.00 $ 49.92 4.00%
Non-Manure Scout Service 2X Week $ 96.00 $ 99.84 4.00%
Non-Manure Scout Service 3X Week $ 144.00 $ 149.76 4.00% Non-Manure Scout Service 4X Week $ 192.00 $ 199.68 4.00% Non-Manure Scout Service 5X Week $ 240.00 $ 249.60 4.00% Non-Manure Scout Service Every other week $ 48.00 $ 49.92 4.00% Non-Manure Scout Service Extra PU $ 48.00 $ 49.92 4.00%

Page 282 of 484 ends

Databases, Tables & Calculators by Subject
Special Notices 4/25/2024
Change Output Options:

From: 2020 To: 2025
include graphs include annual averages
Data extracted on: April 27, 2025 (11:44:30 AM)
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U)
Series Id: CUSR0000SEHG02
Seasonally Adjusted
Series Title: Garbage and trash collection in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, seasonally adjusted Area: U.S. city average
Item: Garbage and trash collection
Base Period: DECEMBER 1983=100
Download:

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual HALF1 HALF2 2020 491.003 494.429 495.288 494.432 494.946 496.679 498.564 500.882 501.756 503.315 504.970 508.190 2021 512.722 517.270 518.505 518.579 516.440 517.202 521.185 524.408 529.934 530.114 529.053 532.538 2022 533.078 538.313 540.719 542.564 544.546 547.554 548.187 548.706 558.254 561.090 563.816 565.185 2023 570.412 575.697 576.773 580.124 587.431 589.812 596.167 597.347 596.997 597.569 601.631 602.164 2024 606.773 610.551 610.015 611.073 609.538 611.946 614.089 615.880 619.640 621.632 627.127 627.807 2025 629.803 641.938 642.053
12-Month Percent Change
Series Id: CUSR0000SEHG02
Seasonally Adjusted
Series Title: Garbage and trash collection in U.S. city average, all urban consumers, seasonally adjusted Area: U.S. city average
Item: Garbage and trash collection
Base Period: DECEMBER 1983=100
Download:

U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS
4/27/25, 8:45 AM Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
https://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet 1/2

Page 283 of 484 ends

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual HALF1 HALF2 2020 3.2 3.6 3.5 3.1 2.9 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.8 4.4
2021 4.4 4.6 4.7 4.9 4.3 4.1 4.5 4.7 5.6 5.3 4.8 4.8
2022 4.0 4.1 4.3 4.6 5.4 5.9 5.2 4.6 5.3 5.8 6.6 6.1
2023 7.0 6.9 6.7 6.9 7.9 7.7 8.8 8.9 6.9 6.5 6.7 6.5
2024 6.4 6.1 5.8 5.3 3.8 3.8 3.0 3.1 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.3
2025 3.8 5.1 5.3
U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Office of Publications and Special Studies Suitland Federal Center Floor 7 4600 Silver Hill Road Washington, DC 20212-0002 Telephone: 202-691-5200 Telecommunications Relay Service: 7-1-1 www.bls.gov Contact Us 4/27/25, 8:45 AM Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
https://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet 2/2

Page 284 of 484 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-12

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,

CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
NORCO AND USA WASTE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. DBA WASTE

MANAGEMENT OF THE INLAND EMPIRE FOR THE COLLECTION,

TRANSPORTATION, RECYCLING, AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE

AND APPROVING RATES THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the City’s franchise agreement with USA Waste of California, Inc., DBA Waste Management of the Inland Empire, (“Waste Management”) provides for an annual adjustment of rates based on annual changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI); and WHEREAS, Waste Management has completed a review of the cost components of the contracted rates; and
WHEREAS, the CPI increased 4.44% percent annually from January 2024 to January 2025; however, by contract rate adjustments are limited to 4%; and WHEREAS, this 4% CPI percentage increase will be applied to all service components and ancillary charges in the current rate; and

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby resolve as follows:

Effective July 1, 2025 residential and commercial service rates shall be as shown on attached Exhibit A.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on May 7, 2025.
_________________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California

Page 285 of 484 ends

ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 7, 2025, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on May 7, 2025.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
Attachment: Exhibit A – Approved Rates

Page 286 of 484 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 7, 2025 Agenda Item:

5.B.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Dana Roa, City Clerk
Department: Administration
SUBJECT:

Reinstate Resolution No. 2021-12, City of Norco Code of Ethics RECOMMENDATION:

Reinstate Resolution No. 2021-12 regarding City of Norco Code of Ethics SUMMARY:

City Staff brought revisions to Resolution No. 2021-12 (Attached), amending the Code of Ethics for City Council Members and Commission/Committee Members, as requested by City Council on February 21, 2024, to City Council for review and possible amendments. The City Council, subsequently, voted to remove Resolution 2021-12 Code of Ethics completely from the City of Norco. Currently there is no Code of Ethics Policy in the City of Norco.

BACKGROUND:

On February 21, 2024, Council requested the Code of Ethics be agendized for review.

On April 3, 2024 city staff brought the discussion of the Code of Ethics to City Council for review and possible amendments to Resolution No. 2021-12. City Council directed staff to revise the Code of Ethics to add a method of enforcement. It was also discussed that matters involving the City Council should be enforced by the City Council, not staff.

It was further suggested that matters involving Commissioners also be enforced by the City Council. Following further discussion, it was determined the prior method of enforcement, included in original Resolution No. 2013-01, should be re-incorporated with refinements providing that Council Members, not staff, review ethics complaints against Council Members and Commissioners, and that examples of remedial actions should be included. In May of 2024, staff brought the revisions as requested to City Council for review and approval. The City Council, subsequently, voted to repeal the Code of Ethics policy from the City of Norco. Currently there is no Code of Ethics in the City of Norco.

Page 287 of 484 ends

A Code of Ethics Policy in local government establishes ethical standards for officials and employees, emphasizing principles like integrity, honesty, accountability, and fairness to ensure public trust and responsible governance. Ethical conduct is crucial for maintaining public trust in government, as citizens have a right to expect ethical behavior from their elected officials and employees. Also, local governments often have mechanisms for reviewing and enforcing their ethics codes, potentially including peerto-peer reviews or investigations.

City Clerk, City Manager and Human Resources Manager reviewed Resolution 2021-

12. Staff is recommending that the City Council reinstate Resolution 2021-12, Code of Ethics Policy for the City of Norco City Council and Commission/Committee members.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable for this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction #4 - Communication and Stakeholder Experience; Enhance the stakeholder experience, engage the community, and build brand awareness through proactive, effective and consistent communication.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution 2021-12

Page 288 of 484 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2021-12

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,

CALIFORNIA, CODE OF ETHICS FOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
AND COMMISSION/COMMITTEE MEMBERS .

WHEREAS, the proper operation of democratic government requires that public officials be independent and impartial in their judgment and actions, that government decisions and policy be made in the proper channels of the governmental structure, that public office not be used for personal gain and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its government and public officials; and
WHEREAS, the realization of these ends is impaired whenever there exists, or appears to exist, an actual or potential conflict between the private interests of a governmental official and commission/committee member, and his or her public duties; and
WHEREAS, a Code of Ethics serves:

1. To increase public confidence in city government; and

2. To assist with decision-making; and

3. To encourage high standards of behavior; and

4. To represent a commitment to uphold a standard of integrity beyond that required by law.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco desires to reinstate its Code of Ethics.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Norco that it desires to adopt the following Code of Ethics:

CODE OF CONDUCT OF THE NORCO CITY COUNCIL AND CITY

COMMISSION/COMMITTEE MEMBERS
PURPOSE AND SCOPE:

In order to best serve the citizens and customers of the City of Norco, the elected and appointed officials, commission/committee members must act individually and collectively to create a City government that is responsible, equitable, honest and open. They are further expected to demonstrate the highest standards of personal integrity, honesty and conduct in all activities.

The City Council members and commission/committee members must be independent, impartial and responsible in the performance of their duties and acting in the public interest. The purpose of this Code of Ethics is to establish policy and guidelines, reflecting expected values and behaviors for use by and applicable to the City Council and

Page 289 of 484 ends

Resolution 2021-12, Code of Ethics

Page 3 ends

May 7, 2025 Reinstated
commission/committee members. Individuals employed by the City under contractual agreement must also observe the provisions of this policy for the term of their contract or as the contract may stipulate.

The City Council members and commission/committee members of the City of Norco at all levels are guardians of the public trust and are required to be impartial and responsible in the fulfillment of their duties. The citizens and customers of the City of Norco expect and must receive the highest standard of ethics from all those in public service, regardless of personal consideration.

This Code of Ethics shall also apply to the use of social media as well as interpersonal communication.

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS:

1. Comply with Law. City Council members and commission/committee members, are obligated to uphold the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California and to comply with Federal, State, and local laws and City policies. Recognizing the special responsibilities of serving the City and its citizens and customers, they are required to maintain the highest standards of integrity and honesty, and they are expected to treat all members of the public and fellow City employees with respect, courtesy, concern and responsiveness. Their conduct in both their official and private affairs should be above reproach to assure that their City position is not used for personal gain.

2. Work for the Common Good. City Council members and
commission/committee members shall represent and work for the common good of the people of Norco and not for private interest, assuring equitable treatment of all persons, claims, and transactions coming before the Norco City Council and City commissions.

3. Conduct of City Council Members and City Commission/Committee Members. The professional and personal conduct of officials must avoid the appearance of impropriety. City Council members and commission/committee members, shall refrain from abusive conduct, personal charges or verbal attacks upon the character or motives of other officials, employees or the public.

City Council members and commission/committee members shall not take any special advantage of services or opportunities for personal gain, by virtue of their public office that is not available to the public in general. They shall refrain from accepting gifts or favors or promises of future benefits which might compromise or tend to impair their independence of judgment or give the appearance of being compromised. All California Fair Political Practices Commission rules and regulations shall be followed in regards to gifting and ticket distribution policies.

4. Respect for Process. The professional and personal conduct of City Council members and commission/committee members must be above reproach, and members must avoid even the appearance of impropriety. They shall perform their duties in

Page 290 of 484 ends

Resolution 2021-12, Code of Ethics

Page 4 ends

May 7, 2025 Reinstated
accordance with the processes and rules of order established governing the deliberation of public policy issues.

5. Use of City Employment and Facilities for Personal Gain. City Council members and commission/committee members shall not use City time, City funds or City facilities, equipment or supplies for personal use or personal gain or for campaign related political activities; nor shall they use or attempt to use their position to secure unwarranted privileges or exemptions for themselves or others.

6. Decisions Based on Merit. City Council members and commission/committee members shall prepare themselves for public issues; listen courteously and attentively to all public discussions before the body and focus on the business at hand. They shall base all decisions on the merits and substance of the matter at hand, rather than on unrelated considerations.

7. Confidential Information. City Council members and commission/committee members shall not use confidential information acquired by or available to them in the course of their employment with the City for personal gain or for personal, non-City business related reasons. They shall respect the confidential information concerning litigation, personnel, property, or other affairs of the City, without proper legal authority, nor use such information to advance their financial or other private interests.

City Council members and commission/committee members shall uphold the public's right to know, and in accordance with the Brown Act, uphold the public's right to know not only the decisions taken, but also the deliberations which shape public policies. Confidential information means all information, whether transmitted verbally or in writing, which is of a nature that it is not, at that time, a matter of public record or public knowledge, including those items described in the California Public Records Act and items subject to the attorney-client privilege. Any City Council member and commission/committee member, who is aware of a breach of confidentiality is expected to bring forth that information in a timely manner.

8. Conflict of Interest. City Council members and commission/committee members are expected to avoid any conflicts of interest. Further, they should avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest in order to ensure that City decisions are made in an independent and impartial manner.

All City Council members and commission/committee members are prohibited from making, participating in making, or attempting in any way to use his or her official position to influence a City decision in which the City of Norco Council Member or commission/committee member knows, or has reason to know, he or she has a financial interest as defined by law. If, however, persons in the public service have financial interests in matters coming before them, or before the department in which they are employed, they shall remove themselves from making, participating in the making, or seeking to influence any decision regarding such matter. All City Council members and commission/committee members who are designated in the City's Conflict of Interest Code shall file the appropriate disclosure statements required under State Law. A conflict of

Page 291 of 484 ends

Resolution 2021-12, Code of Ethics

Page 5 ends

May 7, 2025 Reinstated
interest may arise when dealing with a current or prospective vendor, supplier, or other business.

9. Advocacy. City Council members and commission/committee members shall represent the official policies or positions of the City Council or City Commission to the best of their ability when designated as delegates for this purpose.

10. Positive Work Environment. City Council members and commission/committee members, shall faithfully perform their duties by attending all meetings of which they are a member, unless unable to do so for some compelling reason or disability. They will make every attempt to be punctual and ready for City business and shall support the maintenance of a positive and constructive work place environment for City employees, private citizens and businesses dealing with the City.

11. Discrimination and Harassment. City Council members and commission/committee members shall not, in the performance of their duties, discriminate against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, age, sex, gender, pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, medical condition and actual or perceived gender identity and they will reinforce the City of Norco’s commitment to equal employment opportunity and a work environment free of discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment.

12. Self-Enforcement of the Code. As an expression of the standards of conduct for City Council members and commission/committee members, the City of Norco Code of Ethics is intended to be self-enforcing. It therefore becomes most effective when members are thoroughly familiar with and embrace its provisions. For this reason, the Code of Ethics shall be included in the orientation materials given to candidates for City Council, shall be placed in the City of Norco Commission’s and Committee’s Handbooks. City Council members (as well as City Council candidates filing for office) and commission/committee members, shall sign a statement affirming that they have read and understood the City of Norco Code of Ethics.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 2021-12 the Code of Ethics are hereby reinstated.

Page 292 of 484 ends

Resolution 2021-12, Code of Ethics

Page 6 ends

May 7, 2025 Reinstated
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a meeting held on May 07, 2025.
_____________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
_________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, DANA ROA, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on May 07, 2025, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on May 07, 2025.
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 293 of 484 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 7, 2025 Agenda Item:

6.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Alma Robles, Community Development Director Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

Continued Item - Appeal Hearing: An appeal of the Planning Commission approval of Site Plan 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 (Dorbayan) - A request to approve an 11,780 square foot shopping center and a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility, located at 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone. APNs:
131-140-026, -033, -036, and -037.

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolutions 2025-15 and 2025-16 approving Site Plan 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2022-02 respectively.

SUMMARY:

At the City Council meeting of April 16, 2025, the City Council reviewed Site Plan 2022- 01 and CUP 2022-02, via an appeal. The City Council did not take action, but continued the project to the meeting of May 7, 2025, for further discussion on proper conditions for the project.

BACKGROUND:

The City Council reviewed Site Plan 2022-01 and CUP 2022-02 via an appeal on April 16, 2025 (ref. Attached City Council Report dated April 16, 2025, with Exhibits). The City Council did not take action, but continued the project to the meeting of May 7, 2025, with direction that resolutions be drafted to include both the Planning Commission's conditions and specific conditions to reflect the City Council's concerns/direction.

The overarching concern was the proposed architecture for the project. Staff was directed to draft City Council resolutions to enable approval of the project, but with direction that the applicant work with staff to modify the architectural design/theme to better reflect/be more compatible to the small town/western theme of Sixth Street.

Page 294 of 484 ends

Attached are City Council Resolutions 2025-15 and 2025-16 approving Site Plan 2022- 01 and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 2022-02 respectively. Both resolutions include all of the Planning Commission's conditions, and the following additional conditions at the end of City Council Resolution 2025-15 for the Site Plan 2022-01:
 This approval authorizes the site plan layout (i.e. building footprint, parking etc.,) as shown on Exhibit “D” (referenced in Condition 1 of this resolution). The applicant shall work with staff to modify the architectural design/theme to better reflect/be more compatible to the small town/western theme of Sixth Street. The applicant shall obtain approval of the final design of the Project from the Community Development Director as to architectural/exterior/facade elements including but not limited to fenestration, prior to commencing construction.  All exposed roofing material shall consist of standing seam metal with concealed fasteners.
 The perimeter block wall along the north property shall be 10 feet tall from the finished surface on the project side. This same wall shall step down to six feet as it turns the corners leading into the perimeter walls along the east and west property lines.

The City Council expressed concern over the lack of Building Division conditions. As such, the following conditions were either added, modified or just relocated from other sections of the original Planning Commission approval resolution to be under the Building and Safety category (see the notes in bold at the end of each condition):
 Building plans must meet the current adopted Building Codes by the City of Norco (Currently 2022 Version of the all California Building Codes with amendments). (The word "the" was replaced with "all" so that all most recent codes such as the California Green Building Code, Plumbing Code etc., are adhered to);
 All roof coverings shall be of fire-resistive materials only (Class A or Class B according to the Uniform Building Code). The Building Division shall approve materials. (added);
 Said approval shall become null and void unless building permits for all construction authorized by this approval have been issued within two years after the granting of such approval and pursued diligently to completion. Provided, however, that the Planning Director may extend approvals for up to six months, and provided that after consulting with the City Engineer and Fire Chief, he finds that there would be no new requirements due to changes in the Code and the plan as approved meets all present development standards. (added);  This is not an approval to begin work. No work shall commence until the City of Norco has issued building permits and all other appropriate items. (relocated);  No occupancy of any building and/or structure shall be permitted which is not in compliance with approved plans excepting upon specific review and approval by the Planning Commission. Provided further, that no expansion of use beyond the scope and nature described in this application (Site Plan 2022-01 and related approval for Conditional Use Permit 2022-02) which would tend to increase the projected scale of operations, shall be permitted unless approved by the Planning Director, and may be subject to the approval of a modification of this permit in compliance with all procedures and requirements therefrom. (relocated);
 The developer shall obtain all necessary building permits and pay all applicable City of Norco development fees. Furthermore, no structure shall be occupied or

Page 295 of 484 ends

used until clearance has been given by all applicable departments, and all appropriate permits are received. (relocated); and
 No onsite construction activity work shall be permitted after 6 p.m. or before 7 a.m. or on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays without prior written approval from the Planning Director. Said approvals shall only be granted for emergency situations. (relocated and modified to remove the word "onsite" so that it addresses both onsite and offsite work);
Additional conditions can be added at the discretion of the City Council, which includes any changes to the horse tie.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable to this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

ATTACHMENT(S):

CC Resolution 2025-15 for Site Plan 2022-01
CC Resolution 2025-16 for CUP 2022-02
City Council Staff Report dated April 16, 2025

Page 296 of 484 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-15

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
SUPERCEDING THE PLANNING COMMISSON’S APPROVAL, AND

GRANTING WITH CONDITIONS, A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION TO APPROVE AN 11,780 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL SHOPPING
CENTER ON A 1.74-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT 1461 SIXTH STREET WITHIN THE C-4 (COMMERCIAL) ZONE. SITE PLAN 2022-01.

WHEREAS, Cyrus Dorbayan submitted an application for a Site Plan Review to the City of Norco, California under the provisions of Chapter 18.40, Title 18 of the Norco Municipal Code, on property located at 1461 Sixth Street (APNs: 131-140-026, -033, - 036, and -037); and
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2025, within the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California, 92860, said application was heard by the Planning Commission for the City of Norco, and continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 12, 2025, where said Commission adopted Resolution 2025-03, approving Site Plan 2022-01; and
WHEREAS, said approval was appealed by the City Council, and therefore Site Plan 2022-01 was duly submitted to the City Council via an appeal on April 16, 2025; WHEREAS, at the time set at 7 p.m. on April 16, 2025, within the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California, 92860, said application via the appeal was heard by the City Council for the City of Norco; and WHEREAS, at said time and place set, said City Council considered the aforesaid application and received both oral and written testimony pertaining to said application; and continued said application to the City Council meeting of May 7, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City of Norco, acting as the Lead Agency, has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental assessment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Norco does hereby make the following FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION:

I. FINDINGS:

A. The requested Site Plan will not adversely affect the General Plan or the public convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof. The Norco General Plan designated the site as CC (Commercial Community) with a C-4 (Commercial) zoning designation. The

Page 297 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 2 ends

May 7, 2025
project is consistent with the underlying zoning and the proposed use can be operated in a manner to be compatible with other permitted uses.

B. The requested use will not adversely affect adjoining land uses or future growth within the C-4 (Commercial) zone through undue environmental impacts.

The proposed use will not inhibit or induce growth or development beyond what is already anticipated per the City General Plan.

C. The size and shape of the subject site is adequate to allow full development of the proposed use consistent and in compliance with applicable development and public safety standards. The project will construct a commercial shopping center
with site and building design complying with all pertinent standards in the underlying C-4 (Commercial) zone.

D. The City of Norco, acting as Lead Agency, has determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental assessment per CEQA, Section 15332, Class 32 In-Fill Development Projects. The project occurs within a developed site under 5 acres.

II. DETERMINATION:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, in session assembled May 7, 2025, that the application for a Site Plan Review is approved, thus superseding the Planning Commission’s approval and conditions, subject to the conditions provided in Chapter 18.40 of the Municipal Code of Norco, and including, but not limited to the following conditions:

PLANNING

1. Approval is based on Exhibit D – Revised Project plans dated February 20, 2025, and incorporated herein by reference and on file with the Planning Department.

Development shall occur as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions or revised by the City.

2. The recorded owner of the property and applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, for record purposes, written evidence of agreement with all conditions of this approval before said permit shall become effective.

3. The project shall be in compliance with all City of Norco Municipal Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions. Non-compliance with any provisions of the Norco Municipal Code (NMC) not specifically waived in compliance with City

Page 298 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 3 ends

May 7, 2025
procedures, shall constitute cause for revocation and/or termination of the approvals granted under authority of permit.

4. In the event conditions for approval by the Planning Commission, or City Council (as the case may be) require the revision of plans as submitted, the applicant shall submit four copies of the approved plan (revised to incorporate conditions for approval) to the Planning Department for record purposes for approval of any grading and/or building permits.

5. The subject property shall be developed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications on file with the City of Norco Planning Department.

6. The applicant shall meet all the standards and conditions of the Planning, Fire, Police, Engineering, Building & Safety Departments, and all other applicable departments and agencies.

7. A detailed on-site lighting/photometric plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate the style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding, as not to adversely affect adjacent properties or streets. All lighting shall be installed as approved on the lighting plan.

8. All landscaped areas shall be provided with a water-conserving automatic irrigation system. A detailed landscaping and underground irrigation plan which utilizes drought-resistant plants, along with the application fee, shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. Such plans shall indicate plant and tree types and sizes, and the location and dimensions of all landscaped areas and irrigation lines. Trees to be installed shall be a minimum 24-inch planter box.

Trees adjacent to Sixth Street and within the front setback area shall be a minimum 36-inch box. Shrubs to be installed shall be a minimum 5-gallon container. Shrubs adjacent to Sixth Street and within the front setback shall be a minimum 15-gallon container. Landscape plans shall include a water budget in accordance with the state Water Conservation in Landscaping Act. The inside dimensions of any designated landscape planters adjacent to parking/maneuvering areas which allow vehicle approaches to overhang into said planter areas shall not be credited towards meeting the minimum landscaped area requirements.

9. Trash enclosures shall be designed to meet City standards in the location as indicated on the site plan and/or in a location approved by the authorized waste hauler. The trash enclosure shall be placed on a concrete pad and screened on three sides with a six-foot high solid masonry decorative block wall in

Page 299 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 4 ends

May 7, 2025
conformance with City standards and shall be equipped with a six-foot high sightobscuring gate, “man” entrance, and solid roof cover, subject to approval of the Planning Division. The trash enclosure shall be a minimum size for two bins, one bin for trash and the other bin for recycling.

10.All parking and drive aisle areas shall be maintained free from outdoor storage of pallets, racking, trash, debris, etc., other than for scheduled pick-up.

11.All parking stalls shall be 9’x20’ in size with a maximum two-foot overhang into the designated landscape planters where applicable. Compact vehicle parking stalls are not allowed.

12.Any mechanical equipment such as: air conditioning, heating or cooling equipment, etc. and/or appurtenant ducts, vents, pipes or cable which are proposed to be mounted either on top of, or outside of, any building or structure shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Plans showing the nature, extent, and location of all such appendages and method of architectural integration, visual, and acoustical treatment of the same shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.

13.The proposed project lies within the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) area-wide Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The City has adopted the MSHCP program, and this project shall be subject to the payment of these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless otherwise exempted by the MSHCP.

14.The proposed project lies within an area subject to an area-wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City has adopted the TUMF program, and this project shall be subject to the payment of these fees prior to the issuance of building permits unless exempted by ordinance.

15.A bond or surety device shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of any building prior to the issuance of a building permit for said building. NOTE:

Upon the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on said structure, the City will release the Labor and Materials bond within 180 days, and reduce the Faithful Performance Bond to 10 percent of the original amount and release it after a period of one year if no liens have been filed and the work remains in satisfactory condition.

Page 300 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 5 ends

May 7, 2025

16.No signs are authorized by the approval. Any signs proposed for this project shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval. Once signs are approved, building permits shall be obtained from the Building Division for issuance of a building permit.

17.Any development within the area shown on the site plan as “future building pad area” will require the submittal of the appropriate entitlement application and subsequent approval by the city.

18.Revisions to the Site Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division showing the elimination of the stacked parking count towards the total required parking count or as excess parking.

19.Revisions to the Site Plan shall be made to the entrance and exit curb cuts to accommodate a larger turning radius. Those revisions shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review.

20.Revisions to the Site Plan shall be made to show a clear path of travel on the west side that continues past ADA parking that will connect to the horsetail.

Those revisions shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review.

21.All exits shall post signs that state “Right Turn Only”.

22.Prior to the commencement of any construction activities, the applicant shall install appropriate screening measures around the perimeter of the construction site to minimize visual impacts and maintain the aesthetic quality of the surrounding area.

BUILDING AND SAFETY

23.Building plans shall demonstrate Accessible path of travel between retail buildings, trash area, and drive thru.

24.Building plans shall demonstrate Accessible path of travel from public way to each building on the site.

25.Building plans must meet the current adopted Building Codes by the City of Norco (Currently 2022 Version of all California Building Codes with amendments).

Page 301 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 6 ends

May 7, 2025

26. All roof coverings shall be of fire-resistive materials only (Class A or Class B according to the Uniform Building Code). The Building Division shall approve materials.

27.Said approval shall become null and void unless building permits for all construction authorized by this approval have been issued within two years after the granting of such approval and pursued diligently to completion. Provided, however, that the Planning Director may extend approvals for up to six months, and provided that after consulting with the City Engineer and Fire Chief, he finds that there would be no new requirements due to changes in the Code and the plan as approved meets all present development standards.

28.This is not an approval to begin work. No work shall commence until the City of Norco has issued building permits and all other appropriate items.

29.No occupancy of any building and/or structure shall be permitted which is not in compliance with approved plans excepting upon specific review and approval by the Planning Commission. Provided further, that no expansion of use beyond the scope and nature described in this application (Site Plan 2022-01 and related approval for Conditional Use Permit 2022-02) which would tend to increase the projected scale of operations, shall be permitted unless approved by the Planning Director, and may be subject to the approval of a modification of this permit in compliance with all procedures and requirements therefrom.

30.The developer shall obtain all necessary building permits and pay all applicable City of Norco development fees. Furthermore, no structure shall be occupied or used until clearance has been given by all applicable departments, and all appropriate permits are received.

31.No construction activity work shall be permitted after 6 p.m. or before 7 a.m. or on Saturdays, Sundays or holidays without prior written approval from the Planning Director. Said approvals shall only be granted for emergency situations.

ENGINEERING

32.The developer and subsequent owners shall participate in recycling programs that are in compliance with state requirements and the City's recycling program and shall place recycling facilities as approved by the City and the City's waste hauler.

Page 302 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 7 ends

May 7, 2025

33.A bond or surety device shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of all public improvements. NOTE: Upon acceptance by the City Council of the public improvements and installation of any necessary erosion control devices, the City will release the Labor and Materials bond within 180 days, and reduce the Faithful Performance Bond to 1O percent of the original amount and release it after a period of one year if no liens have been filed and the work remains in satisfactory condition.

34.A bond or surety device shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, guaranteeing completion of all grading, retaining walls, drainage and erosion control improvements.

35.Encroachment Permits shall be obtained from the City of Norco for all work in the public right-of-way prior to the start of work. All work shall be done in accordance with City Standards, and/or as otherwise specified to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and completed prior to certificate of occupancy.

36.The applicant shall obtain written authorization granting permission for any work to be completed on property in which he is not the sole owner. A copy of this written authorization shall be submitted to the City Engineer's office prior to the start of work.

37.The applicant shall submit a preliminary soils report, prepared by a Californialicensed soils engineer, prior to issuance of a building or grading permit.

38.A registered civil engineer shall prepare an on-site precise grading, paving, and drainage plan for approval by the City Engineer as applicable. Plans shall be 24"x36" with elevations to the nearest 0.01 foot, and a maximum scale of 1" = 30’, unless approved differently.

39.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a complete hydrology and hydraulic study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer for approval by the City Engineer. Those recommendations of the report, as approved by the City Engineer, shall be incorporated into site development plans prior to their approval.

40.Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the applicant's engineer shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Plan (SWPPP) covering all construction.

Maintenance of the necessary erosion control devices shall be the responsibility of the applicant. Any emergency repair to these devices performed by City forces

Page 303 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 8 ends

May 7, 2025
shall be billed to the applicant and paid for prior to the release of certificate of occupancy.

41.The project engineer shall include an erosion control plan as part of the precise grading plan, providing for installation of approved erosion control devices (sandbags, desilting basins, etc.) during all phases of construction as applicable.

42.All slopes shall be a maximum of 2:1, unless a slope stability analysis prepared by a registered soils engineer is submitted recommending steeper slope gradients. Review and approval of this analysis shall be at the sole discretion of the City Engineer and in no case shall slopes steeper than 1.5:1 be permitted.

Slopes greater than 5 feet in height and slopes adjacent to street right-of-way shall be planted and irrigated with approved plant material. Review and approval of corresponding landscaping/irrigation plans shall be performed by the Planning Division.

43.A registered civil engineer or landscape architect shall prepare street tree planting, parkway landscaping and irrigation plans on standard size sheets for approval by the City Engineer and Planning Director. Plans shall be submitted at the time of initial submission of all improvement plans. All street tree installations shall conform to the Street Tree Master Plan as approved by the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council.

44.Offsite landscaping must be included on the on-site landscaping plans, which shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Engineering Divisions.

45.Offsite improvements are required for this project including abandonment of existing utility services (including but not limited to sewer, water, gas, electrical & communications), removal of existing driveways and trail pavers, installation of new utility services, installation of new driveway and driveway pavers and associated equestrian trail improvements. A registered civil engineer shall prepare street improvement plans on 24" x 36" mylar for approval by the City Engineer. Striping and signing shall be included as part of these plans, when required. Striping and legends shall be thermoplastic paint. A plan check deposit shall be required prior to plan checking.

46.This development shall be served by underground utilities. All utility locations shall be incorporated into the on-site utility plan and shall be prepared on 24" x 36" mylar, by a registered civil engineer, for approval by the City Engineer.

Page 304 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 9 ends

May 7, 2025

47.The project shall be connected to the City's sewer system; and the applicant shall pay all associated connection fees to the City of Norco, prior to building permit issuance. Grease interceptors shall be required for all food service uses.

48.The project shall be connected to the City's water system; and the applicant shall pay all associated connection fees to the City of Norco, prior to building permit issuance.

49.All existing water services shall be abandoned per City Standards.

50.All existing sewer services shall be abandoned per City Standards.

51.All on-site water and sewer lines are considered private lines. The proposed sewer lateral extending from the sewer main in the street to the property line is the property owner’s maintenance responsibility.

52.Separate water meters and reduced pressure backflows preventers shall be required for each unit within each building and are required to be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each unit.

53.Irrigation lines require reduced pressure backflow preventors to be installed to City standards. It is required that irrigation lines be metered separately.

54.Any required meters and direct digital control devices shall be placed at curb or property line per City standards and as approved by the Public Works Department.

55.A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted concurrently with the site grading plan submittal. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the property owner shall record a Covenant and Agreement, or other approved instrument, with the County-Clerk Recorder to inform future property owners of the requirement to implement the approved WQMP.

56.Prior to the issuance of any grading permit, the applicant shall apply for a National Pollution Discharge and Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Proof of compliance (a copy of the Notice of Intent and application fee) shall be submitted to the Engineering Division prior to start of work. No work shall be done that causes a violation of the City-wide NPDES Permit.

57.Prior to permit issuance the Developer shall merge all affected parcels by way of a Parcel Map or any alternative method permitted by law.

Page 305 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 10 ends

May 7, 2025
FIRE

58.A water system (hydrants - commercial with one 4” outlet and two 2-1/2” outlets) capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided in accordance with Appendix B and C of the California Fire Code shall be provided. A reduction of 50% is permitted in buildings equipped with fire sprinklers in accordance with City Municipal Code. On-site water supply must be available before any combustible material is placed on the construction site. No portion of a building can be more than 400 feet from a hydrant.

59.Prior to building plan approval and construction, applicant/developer shall route a copy of the Water Improvement Plans (offsite) to the Fire Department for review of hydrant placement only. Water Improvement Plans (offsite) will not be reviewed or approved for the installation of onsite Private Fire Service Mains, private hydrants, or fire sprinkler system supplies. The installing contractor shall submit a separate set of working plans designed in accordance with NFPA 13 and NFPA 24 to the Fire Department for a permit to install private water mains.

60.Fire apparatus access roads shall be at least 24 feet wide and comply with Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01A. Access roads shall be located outside of truck docks and between 15 and 40 feet from the building.

Access roads shall not have a grade more than 16% and shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. Access lanes will be designed to withstand the weight of 80,000 thousand pounds. Apparatus weight is distributed as 55,000 pounds on tandem rear axles and 25,000 pounds on the front axle. Fire apparatus access roads shall have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus.

61.The surface shall be designed, constructed, and maintained to provide allweather driving capabilities. A letter or statement, wet-stamped and signed by a registered engineer, shall be provided on the plans certifying that any new road meets this 80,000, all-weather requirement. Road base without an appropriate topping or binding material does not satisfy the all-weather requirement.

62.Parking is not permitted on fire apparatus access roads that are less than 32 feet in width. Parking on one side is permitted on a road that is at least 32 feet but less than 40 feet in width. Parking on two sides is permitted on a road that is 40 feet or more in width.

Page 306 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 11 ends

May 7, 2025

63.Dead-end fire apparatus access roads more than 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. Reference CFC 503.1.1, 503.2.1 as amended by the County of Riverside and Riverside County Office of the Fire Marshal Guideline OFM-01A.

64.Inside and Outside Turning Radii - The minimum inside turning radius for an access road shall be 24 feet. The minimum outside turning radius shall be 45 feet. As fire apparatus are unable to negotiate tight “S” curves, a 60-foot straight leg must be provided between these types of compound-turns, or the radii and/or road width must be increased accordingly (rear of property).

65.Traffic Calming Devices are prohibited. Requests for installation of traffic calming designs/devices on fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Reference CFC 503.4.1

66.Fire Department Building Construction Permit Review - Submittal of construction plans to the Fire Department will be required. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Department reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on California Fire Code, California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted at the time of construction plan submittal.

Reference CFC 105.1.

67.Driveway loops, fire apparatus access lanes and entrance curb radius should be designed to adequately allow access of emergency fire vehicles. The applicant or developer shall include in the building plans the required fire lanes and include the appropriate lane printing and/or signs.

68.Buildings greater than 2,500 square feet shall be equipped with a fire sprinkler system (unless the adopted Building Code or Fire Code dictates a more stringent requirement). The PIV and FDC shall be located to the front, within 100 feet of a hydrant. FDC shall be located so that fire apparatus and hose connected to supply the system will not obstruct roadway access for other fire apparatus.

FDCs are not allowed in the rear of any building. See Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01B and OFM-02.

69.Fire Alarm and Detection System - A water flow monitoring system and/or fire alarm system may be required as determined at time of building construction plan review. Reference CFC 903.4 and CFC 907.2.

Page 307 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 12 ends

May 7, 2025

70.An approved Fire Department access key lock box (minimum Knox 3200 series) shall be installed at the main entrance to any sprinklered building. Gate switches or padlocks shall be installed at each automatic or manual gate. Locations shall be shown on plans submitted for a building permit.

71. The location of address numbers shall be indicated on the building plans. Street numbers shall be displayed in a prominent location on the street or fire apparatus access side of buildings. Numbers and letters shall be a minimum of 12” in height with a minimum stroke of .05 inch. Where access is by means of a private road and the building cannot be viewed from a public way, a monument, pole, or other sign shall be used to identify the structure in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01A. Address must be legible, of a contrasting color, and illuminated either internally or externally to be visible from the street at all hours.

72.No hazardous materials shall be stored and/or used within the building which exceeds quantities listed in the California Fire Code, without first obtaining a permit.

73.Fire sprinkler riser door shall be posted “FIRE RISER” on the outside of the door.

74.Electrical room door shall be posted “ELECTRICAL ROOM” on the outside of the door.

75.Fire alarm control panel door shall be posted “FACU” on the outside of the door.

76.Roof access door shall be posted “ROOF ACCESS” on the outside of the door.

77.Provide specific fire department conditions on plans for building permit submittal.

SHERRIFF

78.Developer shall install video surveillance of entire shopping center including the parking lot, water tower, and play area.

79.360-degree lighting on water tower and play area shall be required, in order to deter taggers and transients.

80.During building plan check submittal, the design of the water tower shall be revised to remove the water tower platform, in discourage vandalism.

Page 308 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 13 ends

May 7, 2025

81.Water tower all metal sculptures shall incorporate protective coatings so graffiti can be easily removed.

CITY COUNCIL

80. This approval authorizes the site plan layout (i.e. building footprint, parking etc.,) as shown on Exhibit “D” (referenced in Condition 1 of this resolution). The applicant shall work with staff to modify the architectural design/theme to better reflect/be more compatible to the small town/western theme of Sixth Street. The applicant shall obtain approval of the final design of the Project from the Community Development Director as to architectural/exterior/facade elements including but not limited to fenestration, prior to commencing construction.

81. All exposed roofing material shall consist of standing seam metal with concealed fasteners.

82. The perimeter block wall along the north property shall be 10 feet tall from the finished surface on the project side. This same wall shall step down to six feet as it turns the corners leading into the perimeter walls along the east and west property lines.
##

Page 309 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 14 ends

May 7, 2025
PASSED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a meeting held on May 7, 2025.
__________________________
Greg Newton, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Norco, California, duly held on May 7, 2025, by the following roll call vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on May 7, 2025.

Page 310 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-15

Page 15 ends

May 7, 2025
_______________________
Dana Roa, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 311 of 484 ends

RESOLUTION 2025-16

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
SUPERCEDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION’S APPROVAL, AND

GRANTING WITH CONDITIONS, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
APPROVE A 1,384 SQUARE-FOOT DRIVE-THRU FOOD SERVICE
FACILITY LOCATED AT 1461 SIXTH STREET, WITHIN THE C-4 ZONE.

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2022-02.

WHEREAS, Cyrus Dorbayan submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to the City of Norco, California under the provisions of Chapter 18.45, Title 18 of the Norco Municipal Code, on property located at 1461 Sixth Street (APNs: 131-140- 026, -033, -036, and -037); and
WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 was duly submitted to said City’s Planning Commission for decision at a public hearing for which proper notice was given; and
WHEREAS, on February 12, 2025, within the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California, 92860, said application was heard by the Planning Commission for the City of Norco, and was continued by the Planning Commission to the March 12, 2025, where said Commission adopted Resolution 2025-04, approving Conditional Use Permit 2022-02; and
WHEREAS, said approval was appealed by the City Council, and therefore Conditional Use Permit Plan 2022-02 via an appeal was scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on April 16, 2025, on or about 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at 2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, California 92860; and WHEREAS, at the time set, the City Council held a public hearing and received both oral and written testimony pertaining to Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 and continued said application to the City Council meeting of May 7, 2025; and WHEREAS, the City of Norco, acting as the Lead Agency, has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental assessment.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Norco does hereby make the following FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION:

I. FINDINGS:

A. The requested Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan or the public convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof. The requested Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan or the public convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof. The proposed use can

Page 312 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-16

Page 2 ends

May 7, 2025
be operated in a manner that is consistent with the surrounding uses and will therefore not have any significant effects.

B. The requested use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, and the growth and development of the area in which it is located. The proposed use is properly screened from adjoining uses by landscaping and a 6-foot-high block wall. Furthermore, the proposed use, when operated in compliance with the conditions of approval, will be compatible with surrounding properties and therefore will not have an adverse effect on adjoining properties.

C. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the proposed use. The project site is adequate in shape and size to accommodate the proposed drivethru restaurant. The proposed use meets all applicable development standards.

All required parking spaces and adequate vehicular queuing space is provided.

D. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways in the area. The traffic generated by the proposed use, when operated in compliance with the conditions of approval, will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways in the area. The number of proposed parking spaces, and drive-thru vehicle queuing meets development code requirements. Further, a traffic impact study, which has been reviewed by the City’s traffic engineer has concluded that the project is not anticipated to adversely impact the traffic operations of the surrounding area.

E. The City of Norco, acting as lead agency, has determined that the project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, pursuant to Class 32 – Infill Development Projects. The project is consistent with the intent of the underlying Commercial Community General Plan Designation, the C-4 (Commercial) Zoning Designation, and occurs within a disturbed site under 5 acres.

II. DETERMINATION:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, in session assembled May 7, 2025, that the application for Conditional Use Permit is approved, thus superseding the Planning Commission’s approval and conditions, subject to the conditions provided in Chapter 18.45 of the Municipal Code of Norco, and including, but not limited to the following conditions:

1. The approval of this Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon the approval of a related application, Site Plan 2022-01, which allows for the construction of a commercial shopping which this subject drive-thru will be located on.

2. All Planning, Engineering, Fire and Sheriff Conditions of Approval for the related shopping center development, Site Plan 2022-01 (as approved by City Council Resolution 2025-15) shall apply to this project.

Page 313 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-16

Page 2 ends

May 7, 2025

3. Approval is based on Exhibit D – Revised Project plans dated February 20, 2025, and incorporated herein by reference and on file with the Planning Department.

Development shall occur as shown unless otherwise noted in these conditions or revised by the City.

4. The recorded owner of the property and applicant shall submit to the Planning Department, for record purposes, written evidence of agreement with all conditions of this approval before said permit shall become effective.

5. In the event conditions for approval by the Planning Commission, or City Council (as the case may be) require the revision of plans as submitted, the applicant shall submit four copies of the approved plan (revised to incorporate conditions for approval) to the Planning Department for record purposes for approval of any grading and/or building permits.

6. The subject property shall be developed in accordance with approved plans and specifications on file with the City of Norco Planning Department.

7. No occupancy of any building and/or structure shall be permitted which is not in compliance with approved plans excepting upon specific review and approval by the Planning Commission. Provided further, that no expansion of use beyond the scope and nature described in this application (Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 and related approval for Site Plan 2022-01) which would tend to increase the projected scale of operations, shall be permitted unless approved by the Planning Director, and may be subject to the approval of a modification of this permit in compliance with all procedures and requirements therefrom.

8. The approval granted under this Conditional Use Permit shall be specifically limited to the establishment of a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru restaurant with 10 vehicle queuing spaces. This development is related to the approval of Site Plan 2022-01. The commencement of any type of use except as provided for herein, shall constitute an intensification of the use approved hereunder and shall be subject to the review and approval by the Planning Director and may be subject to the approval by the Planning Commission of a modification of Conditional Use Permit 2022-02.

9. It is hereby established that it shall be grounds for revocation of this conditional use permit if the permittee, his agent or assigns, or employee(s) of his establishment, or any other person connected or associated with the permittee or any person who is exercising managerial authority of the business establishment has:
a. Violated any rule, regulation or condition of approval adopted by the Planning Commission relating to this conditional use permit; or

Page 314 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-16

Page 2 ends

May 7, 2025
b. Conducted the operation permitted hereunder in a manner contrary to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the public or in a manner which either generates or contributes to noise and/or health/sanitation nuisances, or which results in undesirable activities or creating an increased demand for public services.

10.The developer shall obtain all necessary building permits and pay all applicable City of Norco development fees. Furthermore, no structure shall be occupied or used until clearance has been given by all applicable departments, and all appropriate permits are received.
##

Page 315 of 484 ends

CC Resolution 2025-16

Page 2 ends

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on May 7, 2025.

Page 316 of 484 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: April 16, 2025 Agenda Item:

6.A.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Alma Robles, Community Development Director Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

Appeal Hearing: An appeal of the Planning Commission approval of Site Plan 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 (Dorbayan) - A request to approve an 11,780 square foot shopping center and a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility, located at 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone. APNs: 131-140-026, - 033, -036, and -037.

RECOMMENDATION:

City Council concur with the determination of the Planning Commission to approve Site Plan Review 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02, subject to the Conditions of Approval in Planning Commission Resolutions 2025-03 and 2025-04 respectively.

SUMMARY:

Site Plan 2022-01 is a request to allow an 11,780 square-foot shopping center, while Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 is a request to allow a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility within the parking lot of the said shopping center. The shopping center and drive-thru facility will total 13,164 square feet. The project is located on a 1.73-acre site (consisting of four legal parcels), identified as 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone.

BACKGROUND:

This project went before the Planning Commission on February 12, 2025 (ref. Exhibit "A" Staff Report). During the meeting, Planning Commissioners expressed their overall support for the project but had concerns with the height of the perimeter wall, the horse staging areas, and technical aspects of the parking area. The applicant addressed the Planning Commissioner's concerns by: increasing the height of the wall to 10' to alleviate any concerns with neighboring residential properties, improving the parking spaces and accessibility throughout the site, and improving the horse staging areas.

Page 317 of 484 ends

Updated plans reflecting the changes above were presented at the Planning Commission meeting of March 12, 2025 (ref. Exhibit "B" Revision Report/Summary and Exhibit "C" Revised Project Plans), where the Planning Commission unanimously approved the project via Resolutions 2025-03 and 04, which have been attached for the City Council's review, further adding the following conditions:

22. Revisions to the Site Plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division showing the elimination of the stacked parking count towards the total required parking count or as excess parking.

23. Revisions to the Site Plan shall be made to the entrance and exit curb cuts to accommodate a larger turning radius. Those revisions shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review.

24. Revisions to the Site Plan shall be made to show a clear path of travel on the west side that continues past ADA parking that will connect to the horsetail. Those revisions shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review.

25. All exits shall post signs that state “Right Turn Only”.

26. Prior to the commencement of any construction activities, the applicant shall install appropriate screening measures around the perimeter of the construction site to minimize visual impacts and maintain the aesthetic quality of the surrounding area.

Staff is recommending that the City Council concur with the determination of the Planning Commission to approve Site Plan Review 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02, subject to the conditions of approval in Planning Commission Resolutions 2025-03 and 2025-04 respectively. Should the Council amend the project and/or conditions of approval, or overturn the Planning Commissions decision and deny the project, staff will bring back resolutions to reflect the Council's decision.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Not applicable to this item.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Daphne Liu, Accounting Manager Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Page 318 of 484 ends

Exhibit A - Staff Report - Site Plan 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 (Dorybayan)
Exhibit - B - Revised Report/Summary
Exhibit -C - Revised Project Plans
Resolution 2025-03 for Site Plan 2022-01 Revised
Resolution 2025-04 for CUP 2022-02

Page 319 of 484 ends

Planning Commission

STAFF REPORT
Date: February 12, 2025 Agenda Item:

5.A.

To: Honorable Chair and Commission Members
From: Alma Robles, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Vince Acuna, Senior Planner
Department: Planning
SUBJECT:

Site Plan 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 (Dorbayan): A request to approve an 11,780 square foot shopping center and a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility, located at 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone. APNs:
131-140-026, -033, -036, and -037.

RECOMMENDATION:

Approve Site Plan Review 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit 2022-02, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval in Resolutions 2025-03 and 2025-04 respectively.

SUMMARY:

Site Plan 2022-01 is a request to allow an 11,780 square-foot shopping center, while Conditional Use Permit 2022-02 is a request to allow a 1,384 square-foot drive-thru food service facility within the parking lot of the said shopping center. The shopping center and drive-thru facility will total 13,164 square feet. The project is located on a 1.73-acre site, identified as 1461 Sixth Street within the C-4 (Commercial) Zone BACKGROUND:

SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is currently comprised of four parcels with a total area of 75,602 square feet. The rectangular project area has a frontage along the north side of Sixth Street of about 252 feet and a depth of about 300 feet (ref. Exhibit - A - Location Map and Exhibit - B - APN Map). The site contains several residential structures (ref. Exhibit C – Aerial). The table below summarizes the existing land uses, Zoning, and General Plan Designations of the subject property as well as the surrounding area.

EXISTING LAND

USE ZONING GENERAL PLAN
Project Site Residential
Structures
Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community

EXHIBIT A

Page 320 of 484 ends

North Plant Nursery
Agricultural Low
Density
(A-1-20)
Residential
Agricultural
South Shopping Center Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
East Vacant Commercial
(C-4)
Commercial
Community
West Drive-Thru/SingleFamily Residence
Commercial
General
(C-G)
Commercial
Community
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS: The project proposes to demolish all structures on the subject property and construct a commercial shopping center and drive-thru, and all associated improvements (ref. Exhibit D – Project Plans). Various project components are broken down and discussed in detail below.

Building Siting and Architecture
The commercial shopping center consists of 11,780 square feet of commercial space and 1,384 square feet of restaurant/drive-thru space. All commercial spaces are distributed among three buildings plotted along the western boundary of the project site.

The restaurant/drive-thru pad is located toward the center of the project site (see Sheet

5.1 of Exhibit D – Project Plans). The entire commercial shopping center features a modern, western-inspired design, incorporating various western elements such as horizontal siding, high parapets, and deep awnings on the proposed structures. Western style design elements found in associated improvements also strengthen the overall architectural character of the shopping center itself. These include a western-themed play area for children, western themed light standard, and a rustic water tower.

The project meets all pertinent setback and height standards of the underlying C-4 Zone, with the exception of the required front yard setback (which can vary with approval by the Planning Commission), as demonstrated in the table below.

DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED MEETS STANDARDS?
Front Yard (1) Min. 30’ 10’ To be determined
by PC
Side Yard (2) Min. 12’ 60’ Yes
Rear yard 0’ 4’ - 2” Yes
Height 35’
25’ (Restaurant/Drive
Thru)
14’ (Commercial
Retail)
Yes
Distance Between
Buildings 12’ 15’ Yes
(1) Min. front yard may be varied by the Planning Commission to 10 feet if in the opinion of the Planning Commission, sufficient features are incorporated into the site and architectural plans warrant increased exposure to accent the western theme of the C-4 zone.
(2) Where a rear yard is provided, there shall also be provided a side yard of 12 feet on at least one side of the lot or a

Page 321 of 484 ends

DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD REQUIRED PROPOSED MEETS STANDARDS?
recorded vehicular access easement from a public street to said rear yard.

As noted on the table, the Planning Commission may approve a front yard setback of 10 feet, if it deems appropriate. The applicant is requesting for a 10-foot setback in lieu of the required 30 feet in order to bring the buildings forward closer to the street, which in turn allows the project space to accommodate visitor amenities such as the proposed gazebo and western-themed play area along the western side of the project site.

Walls and Landscaping
A 6-foot-tall concrete block wall is proposed along the perimeter of the project site.

However, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission require a 9-foot high block wall fence to properly buffer the project from the adjacent A-1-20 zoned property directly to the north of the project (per the requirements of NMC 18.31.08(5) and (6) a minimum 6-foot block wall is required when adjacent to residential). The block wall as proposed, terminates within 10-feet of the horse trail along Sixth Street, matching the 10-foot building setback requested by the applicant (see Sheet 7.1 of Exhibit D – Project Plans).

Landscaping is provided throughout the project site, particularly along the front setback, in front of the commercial buildings, western-themed play area, as well as both sides of the drive-thru lane (see Sheet 7.3 of Exhibit D – Project Plans). The total proposed landscape percentage for the project is 21.82% of the total project area, far exceeding the code required requirement of 5%.

Lighting
The project features western-themed light standards and fixtures throughout the site (see Sheet 7.2 of Exhibit D – Project Plans). The project is conditioned to provide a photometric lighting plan which demonstrates that no light spillage will occur on the adjacent property prior to the issuance of building plans.

Parking and Circulation
Vehicular access to the site is taken from two driveways toward the southerly portion of the site’s frontage along Sixth Street. Both driveways are two-way driveways, allowing ingress and egress to the parking lot. The drive-thru entrance begins toward the center of the parking lot, minimizing potential queuing along the public-right-of-way. The drivethru lane has space for a stack of 10 vehicles and is designed to be wide enough for vehicles with truck trailers.

Based on the proposed uses, the project requires a total of 61 parking spaces, and 69 parking spaces is provided. These 69 parking spaces include the spaces for 10 vehicles that could be accommodated by the drive-thru lane. The northernmost parking row toward the rear of the site are available to accommodate pull through trailers. The project incorporates two horse stall areas toward the front and rear of the site. Bike racks are also provided toward the central gazebo area. Together, these project design elements provide the maximum flexibility for different visitors, accommodating multimodal access and parking for the shopping center (see Sheet 7.0 of Exhibit D – Project Plans).

Page 322 of 484 ends

The applicant provided a traffic impact study to examine the potential traffic and parking impacts associated with the project (ref. Exhibit E – Traffic Impact Study). The study suggested minor traffic signal improvements at the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue. With the signal timing revision, the traffic generated by the project is not anticipated to adversely impact the traffic operations of the surrounding area. This traffic study was reviewed and approved by the City’s traffic engineer.

Additional Amenities
As previously discussed, the project includes several amenities, such as a western themed children’s play area, gazebo, several outdoor seating areas, and horse tie-ups in multiple locations. These additional amenities increase the viability, usability, and overall satisfaction of visitors.

Future Building Pad Area
The site plan shows a “future building pad” area within the project site, which is intended to be used for a future development (see Sheet 5.1 of Exhibit D – Project Plans). Any development within this area is conditioned to require a separate Planning Commission review, either in the form of a Site Plan Review or a Conditional Use Permit, depending on the future use. In the interim, the applicant is proposing to use this area as a temporary seating area for visitors, which also could be used to stage special events such as parking lot sales, food trucks, etc.

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT:

Drive-thru facilities require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the C-4 zone, per NMC

18.23.04. The purpose of a CUP is to review the location, site development, and/or conduct of certain land uses and buildings. These are uses which generally have a unique and distinct impact on the area in which they are located or are capable of creating special problems for adjacent properties unless given special review and special conditions. A Conditional Use Permit may be granted at the discretion of the Planning Commission.

NMC Chapter 18.45.14 requires the Planning Commission to make certain findings prior to granting a Conditional Use Permit. These findings and justifications to these findings are as follows:

1. The requested Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan or the public convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof.

The requested Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the General Plan or the public convenience or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood thereof. The proposed use can be operated in a manner that is consistent with the surrounding uses and will therefore not have any significant effects.

2. The requested use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, and the growth and development of the area in which it is located.

Page 323 of 484 ends

The proposed use is properly screened from adjoining uses by landscaping and a 6-foot-high block wall. Furthermore, the proposed use, when operated in compliance with the conditions of approval, will be compatible with surrounding properties and therefore will not have an adverse effect on adjoining properties.

3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the proposed use.

The project site is adequate in shape and size to accommodate the proposed drive-thru restaurant. The proposed use meets all applicable development standards. All required parking spaces and adequate vehicular queuing space is provided.

4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways in the area.

The traffic generated by the proposed use, when operated in compliance with the conditions of approval, will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways in the area. The number of proposed parking spaces, and drive-thru vehicle queuing meets development code requirements. Further, a traffic impact study, which has been reviewed by the City’s traffic engineer has concluded that the project is not anticipated to adversely impact the traffic operations of the surrounding area.

ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW: The Architectural Review Sub-Committee (ARC) reviewed the proposed project on January 10, 2024. The ARC suggested that the applicant incorporate parking spaces for trucks and horse trailers and add horse corrals on-site. The applicant subsequently incorporated all these elements in the proposed project.

IMPACT ANALYSIS PER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA): Staff has determined that this project is exempt from CEQA review under Class 32 – In-fill Development Projects. The project occurs within a previously disturbed site under 5 acres.

NOTICING: Property owners within the required 300-foot radius were notified of the project with at least 25 properties notified as required for public hearings. At the time of writing this report, no comments were received.

CONCLUSION: Evidence to assist the Planning Commission in making the required findings for granting the requested Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit are noted above. Staff is recommending approval and has attached Resolution 2025-03 and 2025-04 for consideration.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The project will provide additional tax revenue to the City.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

Page 324 of 484 ends

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 3 - Economic Development and Financial Stability: Assure financial stability by expanding development efforts, diversifying revenue sources and continuing prudent financial management.

REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Approved by: Lisette Free, Interim City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

Resolution 2025-03 for Site Plan 2022-01
Resolution 2025-04 for CUP 2022-02
Exhibit A - Location Map
Exhibit B - APN Map
Exhibit C - Aerial
Exhibit D - Project Plans
Exhibit E - Traffic Impact Study
(Resolution Superceded)
(Resolution Superseded)
(Exhibit D Superseded)

Page 325 of 484 ends

Exhibit "A"
Site Plan 2022-01, CUP 2022-02
Cyrus Dorbayan
1461 Sixth Street
PROJECT:

APPLICANT:

LOCATION:

E Not to Scale
Location Map
0 0
0 0
0 0
1417
0 0
0 4061
0 0
4095
3988
4023
4060
3999
4120
1374 1338
1501
4022
4044
1452
1375
1414
3821 1437 1417
1451
4007
0 1491
4010
4060
4043
4040
1473
4020
4000
1464
1470
1461
1426
3828
4080
1488
3783
3826
4081
3830
3828
3951
1439
3969
3818
0 SIXTH ST
SIE
R
R
A
AV
IN
T
E
R
STAT
E 15

ROYAL OWL RD
15 SOUTH
BOU
N
D
OFF
RAM
P
15 N
O
RT
H
B
O
U
N
D
O
N
RA
M
P
15 N
ORTH
BOU
N
D
OFF
RAM
P
IN
T
E
R
STAT
E 15

Page 326 of 484 ends

EXHIBIT B
– APN MAP

Page 327 of 484 ends

EXHIBIT C
- AERIAL
N

Page 328 of 484 ends

REAL ENGINEERING INC.

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
Proposed Commercial Development
1461 Sixth St,
Norco, CA.

PREPARED FOR:
` CENTRAL SALES GROUP
33761 PASEO DEL PUERTO, SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA, 92675
September 3, 2024
Exhibit E

Page 329 of 484 ends

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 4 Study Approach and Methodology .................................................................................. 5 Highway Capacity Analysis: Existing Conditions............................................................. 6 Existing Conditions................................................................................................... 6 Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes ....................................................................... 6 Existing Conditions Capacity Analysis ................................................................... 8 Highway Capacity Analysis: No-Build Conditions............................................................ 9 No-Build Conditions .................................................................................................. 9 No-Build Conditions Capacity Analysis ................................................................ 11 Highway Capacity Analysis: Build Conditions ............................................................... 12 Trip Generation........................................................................................................ 12 Trip Distribution....................................................................................................... 12 Build Conditions Traffic Volumes .......................................................................... 16 Build Conditions Capacity Analysis ...................................................................... 17 Access To/From Site…………………………………………………………………………..18
Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 19

APPENDIX
A. Site Plan of Project
B. Turning Movement Counts
C. ITE Trip Generation
D. 2024 Existing Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports
E. 2025 No-Build Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports
F. 2025 Build Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports

Page 330 of 484 ends

3 FIGURES
Figure 1 Aerial of Subject Property, Surrounding Area and the Study Intersections ....... 4 Figure 2A Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes – AM Peak Hour .................................... 7 Figure 2B Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes – PM Peak Hour………………….………7 Figure 2C Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday Peak Hour…………………...8 Figure 3A No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes- AM Peak Hour…………………..…… 10 Figure 3B No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes – PM Peak Hour……………………….10 Figure 3C No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes – Saturday Peak Hour…………….. …11 Figure 4A Site Generated Trips – AM Peak Hour………………………………………….13 Figure 4B Site Generated Trips – PM Peak Hour……………………………………...….13 Figure 4C Site Generated Trips – Saturday Peak Hour……………………………….….14 Figure 5A Pass-By Trips – AM Peak Hour………………………………………………….14 Figure 5B Pass-By Trips – PM Peak Hour……………………………………………….…15 Figure 5C Pass-By Trips – Saturday Peak Hour…………………………………….……..15 Figure 6A Build Condition Traffic Volumes – AM Peak Hour……………………………..16 Figure 6B Build Condition Traffic Volumes – PM Peak Hour…………………………….16 Figure 6C Build Condition Traffic Volumes – Saturday Peak Hour………………………16 TABLES
Table 1. Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections....................................... 6 Table 2. Existing Conditions LOS Summary .................................................................. 9 Table 3. No-Build Conditions LOS Summary…………………………………………… ..11 Table 4. Trip Generation……………………………………………………………………..12
Table 5. Build Conditions LOS Summary..................................................................... 18

Page 331 of 484 ends

4 Introduction
This Traffic Impact Study (“TIS”) was prepared to examine the potential traffic and parking impacts associated with the proposed commercial development located at 1461 Sixth Street in Norco, CA. The proposed commercial development will consist of two buildings which will be utilized as drive-thru restaurants and three buildings which will be occupied by retail tenants. Access is proposed to be provided by two full-service driveways off 6th Street, see Appendix A for site plan of project.

The proposed site is located at the north side of Sixth Street between the signalized intersections of Sixth Street with Sierra Avenue and Valley View Avenue.

The above intersections Sixth Street in the immediate vicinity of the Site are likely to be impacted by the additional traffic generated by the proposed development and are hence studied. Figure 1 below is a Google Earth Pro aerial depicting the subject property, surrounding area and the study intersections.

Figure 1. Aerial of Subject Property, Surrounding Area and the Study Intersections

Page 332 of 484 ends

5 Study Approach and Methodology
This Traffic Study was prepared by using Riverside Country, CA codes to determine any potential traffic impacts from the proposed development. The analysis constituted the following:

1. Reviewing the project site plan and related documents to incorporate it into the project scope and layout.

2. Reviewing the adjacent roadway system to determine key intersection(s) that might be impacted.

3. Obtaining turning movement counts at the key intersection(s) during the anticipated peak hours of the site in conjunction with the roadway system. The turning movement counts were reviewed for accuracy and processed to obtain traffic volumes for the 2024 existing conditions.

4. Projecting the existing conditions data into the 2025 build year by applying 2.00% of annual growth rate to use as the basis for the future no-build conditions.

5. Using the industry standard ITE Trip Generation Manual to determine the anticipated site-generated traffic volumes.

6. Adding and distributing the site-generated traffic volumes to the no-build 2025 traffic volumes to use as the future build conditions.

7. Performing a highway capacity analysis for the study intersection for the 2024 existing conditions, 2025 no-build conditions and 2025 build conditions.

8. Evaluating the results of the highway capacity analysis to assess any traffic impacts.

The highway capacity analysis was performed utilizing industry standard software Synchro 11. The software faithfully duplicates the methods and computations found in the 7 th Edition of the Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board. The signalized module was used for the study intersections. The level-of-service criteria is presented in Table 1 below.

Page 333 of 484 ends

6 Table 1. Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Level of
Service
Average Control Delay
(seconds/vehicle) General Description
A ≤10 Free flow
B >10 – 20 Stable flow (slight delays)
C >20 – 35 Stable flow (acceptable delays)
D >35 – 55 Approaching unstable flow (tolerable delay,
occasionally wait through more than one signal cycle
before proceeding)
E >55 – 80 Unstable flow (intolerable delay)
F >80 Forced flow (congested and queues fail to clear)
Highway Capacity Analysis: Existing Conditions
Existing Conditions
Sixth Street is a two-way roadway with two through lanes in each direction serving eastbound and westbound traffic in the area, with a center turn lane and left turning lanes at signalized intersections in the vicinity of the project.

The study intersections are signalized four-legged intersections with turning lanes at the Sixth Street approaches.

Traffic signal phasing and timings for the study intersections were obtained from the City of Norco.

The land uses in the study area along Sixth Street are predominantly commercial.

Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes
Turning movement counts were collected at the study intersections on Wednesday May 29th, 2024, between 7 AM and 9 AM and between 4 PM to 6 PM. Turning movement counts were also collected on Saturday June 1st, 2024 between 12 noon and 3 PM.

At each intersection, the turning movement count data revealed that the peak hours generally occurred on weekdays approximately between 7:30 AM and 8:30 AM in the morning and between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM in the evening.

Figures 2A, 2B, 2C show the existing traffic volumes at the intersections in the study area for both AM and PM peak hours, See Appendix B, for turning movement count data.

Page 334 of 484 ends

7 Figure 2A. Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes- AM Peak Hour Figure 2B. Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes- PM Peak Hour

Page 335 of 484 ends

8 Figure 2C. Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes- Saturday Peak Hour Existing Conditions Capacity Analysis
The existing conditions capacity analysis results are illustrated in Table 2 below. The capacity analysis reports are included in the Appendix D. The results reveal that the intersection of Sixth Street and Sierra Avenue operate at LOS C for AM, PM and Saturday peak hours while the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour and LOS D during the PM and Saturday peak hours.

Table 2. Existing Conditions LOS Summary
Intersection Approach
AM PM Saturday
Delay
(s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
Sixth Street &
Sierra Ave
NB 22.1 C 20.5 C 18.6 B
SB 20.4 C 20.0 B 18.5 B
EB 19.5 B 24.6 C 26.8 C
WB 31.3 C 27.2 C 26.6 C
Intersection 24.6 C 24.8 C 25.5 C
Sixth Street &
Valley View
Avenue
NB 9.6 A 11.1 B 9.0 A
SB 10.5 B 15.7 B 16.5 B
EB 18.7 B 24.2 C 26.0 C
WB 87.3 F 53.8 D 77.3 E
Intersection 56.3 E 35.8 D 48.4 D

Page 336 of 484 ends

9 Highway Capacity Analysis: No-Build Conditions
No-Build Conditions
To examine the future conditions without the proposed development, the existing condition traffic volumes must be projected for the year 2025 in which the full build-out of the project is anticipated to be completed. Based on information available from the City of Norco, the background traffic growth is two (2) percent per year.

A list of vicinity developments was received from the City of Norco and the list is included in the Appendix. Ideally, trips generated by these vicinity developments would be obtained from the approved traffic impact studies for these developments and those trips distributed within the study area roadway network. Those volumes would be added to the grown traffic volumes to obtain the No-Build traffic volumes. However, no relevant approved traffic impact study for the developments was available at the time of this report.

Figures 3A,3B,3C below show the 2025 No-Build conditions traffic volumes.

Figure 3A. No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Hour

Page 337 of 484 ends

10 Figure 3B. No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour Figure 3C. No-Build Conditions Traffic Volumes - Saturday Peak Hour

Page 338 of 484 ends

11 No-Build Conditions Capacity Analysis
The No-Build conditions capacity analysis results are illustrated in the table below. The capacity analysis reports are included in the Appendix E.

Table 3. No-Build Conditions LOS Summary
Intersection Approach
AM PM Saturday
Delay
(s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS
Delay
(s/veh) LOS
Sixth Street &
Sierra Ave
NB 23.3 C 20.5 C 19.1 B
SB 21.3 C 20.0 B 19.2 B
EB 19.9 B 24.6 C 28.0 C
WB 32.3 C 27.2 C 27.6 C
Intersection 25.3 C 24.8 C 26.6 C
Sixth Street &
Valley View
Avenue
NB 9.6 A 11.1 B 11.8 B
SB 10.5 B 15.7 B 16.6 B
EB 18.7 B 24,2 C 27.4 C
WB 87.3 F 53.8 D 92.4 F
Intersection 56.3 E 35.8 D 56.1 E

Page 339 of 484 ends

12 Highway Capacity Analysis: Build Conditions
Trip Generation
The project proposes 3,139 sf of restaurant/coffeeshop with drive-thru and 11,779 sf of retail space.

In order to estimate the trips generated by the proposed project, reference was made to the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE).

Table 4 illustrates the calculation for generated trips for the proposed project, See Appendix C for Trip Generation Figure.

Table 4. Trip Generation
LU Project Size Daily
Trips
AM Peak PM Peak Sat Peak
In Out Total In Out Total In Out Total
937
Coffee/Donut
Shop with
Drive-Thru
Window
3,139 sf 1675 159 159 318 69 69 137 138 138 276
822 Strip Retail
Plaza (<40k)
11,779
sf 727 45 45 90 78 78 156 39 39 77
Total base trips 2402 204 204 408 146 146 292 177 177 354 60 % pass by Trips 1441 122 122 244 88 88 176 106 106 212 Net new trips 961 82 82 164 58 58 116 71 71 142
The total number of new trips forecast to be generated by the proposed development is 164 in the AM peak hour (82 entering and 82 exiting), 116 in the PM peak hour (58 entering and 58 exiting) and 142 in the PM peak hour (71 entering and 71 exiting). The development is also projected to generate 961 net new daily trips.

Trip Distribution
The site generated traffic was distributed to the study intersections based on prevailing traffic patterns in the area. Figures 4A, 4B and 4C below show the new traffic generated by the proposed site distributed at the study intersections and Figures 5A,5B and 5C show the pass-by trips that affect the site driveway traffic volumes.

Page 340 of 484 ends

13 Figure 4A. Site Generated Trips – AM Peak Hour
Figure 4B. Site Generated Trips – PM Peak Hour

Page 341 of 484 ends

14 Figure 4C. Site Generated Trips – Saturday Peak Hour Figure 5A. Pass-By Trips – AM Peak Hour

Page 342 of 484 ends

15 Figure 5B. Pass-By Trips – PM Peak Hour
Figure 5C. Pass-By Trips – Sat Peak Hour

Page 343 of 484 ends

16 Build Conditions Traffic Volumes
The traffic volumes generated by the proposed site, adjusting for the pass-by trips were added to the 2025 No-Build traffic volumes to represent the anticipated traffic volumes that will occur in the 2025 Build-out year. Figures 6A, 6B and 6C below show the Build conditions traffic volumes.

Figure 6A. Build Condition Traffic Volumes - AM Peak Hour Figure 6B. Build Condition Traffic Volumes - PM Peak Hour

Page 344 of 484 ends

17 Figure 6C. Build Condition Traffic Volumes - Saturday Peak Hour Build Conditions Capacity Analysis
The 2025 Build conditions capacity analysis results are shown in Table 5 below. The capacity analysis reports are included in the Appendix F. A comparative review of Tables 4 and 5 reveal the following:
• Approach LOS and Overall LOS for the intersection of Sixth Street and Sierra Avenue are not adversely affected by the site generated trips for all peak hours. • For the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue, during the PM peak hour, the westbound approach deteriorates from a LOS D (53.8 sec/veh) to LOS F (101.8 sec/veh). The overall intersection deteriorates from LOS D (35.8 sec/veh) to LOS E (59.5 sec/veh). In the Saturday peak hour the westbound approach deteriorates from LOS F (92.4 sec/veh) to LOS F (139.9 sec/veh).

It is contended that minor signal timing improvements at the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue will be needed to mitigate the traffic impacts of the proposed development.

Page 345 of 484 ends

18 Table 5. Build Conditions LOS Summary
Intersection Approach
AM PM Saturday
Delay
(s/veh) LOS Delay (s/veh) LOS Delay(s/veh) LOS
Sixth Street & Sierra
Ave
NB 24.3 C 22.3 C 19.1 B
SB 22.3 C 23.3 C 21.2 C
EB 20.9 C 29.1 C 30.4 C
WB 34.2 C 27.4 C 26.2 C
Intersection 26.8 C 27.5 C 27.4 C
Sixth Street & Valley
View Avenue
NB 11.0 B 11.3 B 12.2 B
SB 10.4 B 15.0 B 14.9 B
EB 19.4 B 33.1 C 31.8 C
WB 151.4 F 101.8 F 139.9 F
Intersection 90.6 F 59.5 E 80.1 F
Driveway 1 Intersection 34.3 C 45.1 D 44.6 D
Driveway 2 Intersection 33.9 C 47.4 D 46.8 D
Access To/From Site
Both site driveways are proposed to be approximately 25 feet wide with one exiting lane and one receiving lane.

A queuing analysis indicated the following:
• A stacking length (95th percentile queue) of approximately 224 feet (11 vehicles) is needed at the site driveway in the AM peak hour.
• A stacking length (95th percentile queue) of approximately 67 feet (4 vehicles) is needed at the site driveway in the PM peak hour.
• A stacking length (95th percentile queue) of approximately 204 feet (10 vehicles) is needed at the site driveway in the Saturday peak hour.

Thus, a maximum stacking length of 224 feet is required at the southbound approach of either site driveways.

Per the latest site plan, approximately 240 feet of stacking length is provided at each driveway approaches.

Page 346 of 484 ends

19 The driveways are proposed to be a full-service STOP controlled driveway and should be able to handle the stacking necessary for vehicles at the coffee-shop drive-thru.

Drive-Thru Stacking: The proposed site plan illustrates two buildings, which are supposed to be occupied by coffee-shop establishments with drive-thrus. The building on the northern side of the site provides a drive-thru vehicle stacking of approximately 192 feet, which is approximately 9 vehicles. The building, on the southern side of the site provides a drive-thru vehicle stacking of approximately 169 feet, which is approximately 8 vehicles.

Page 347 of 484 ends

20 Conclusions
Based on the foregoing, with a reasonable degree of engineering certainty, the conclusions of this Traffic Impact Study are the following:

1) The proposed development will generate approximately 164 new trips during the AM peak hour, approximately 116 new trips in the PM peak hour and 142 new trips during the Saturday peak hour.
2) A review of the LOS summary table indicates that the westbound approach of the intersection of Sixth Street and Valley View Avenue will likely be impacted by additional traffic generated by the project. This impact can be mitigated by minor traffic signal timing improvement at this location.
3) The intersection of the site driveway with Sixth Street is projected to operate at LOS D or better during the peak hours.
4) A maximum stacking length of approximately 224 feet is required at the southbound approach of the site driveway.
5) With the above signal timing revision, it is our considered professional opinion that the traffic generated by the proposed project will not adversely impact the traffic operations of the study area intersections.

Page 348 of 484 ends

21 APPENDIX A
Site Plan of Project

Page 349 of 484 ends

HORSE TIE-UP STALLS

WITH DOORS
10' - 0"10' - 0"
25' - 0"25' - 0"
R 13' - 0"

NORCO SIGN POST
01 1" = 40'-0"

LEFT/RIGHT TURN

Page 350 of 484 ends

22 APPENDIX B
Turning Movement Counts

Page 351 of 484 ends

File Name : SierraAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Passenger - Motorcycle - Bus - 2 Axle - 3 Axle - 4 Axle - 5+ Axles Sierra Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Sierra Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 7 10 8 123 19 9 6 2 21 91 7 304
07:15 AM 8 5 21 13 177 11 13 8 4 46 111 19 436
07:30 AM 8 19 32 18 174 9 25 10 2 50 119 32 498
07:45 AM 10 12 21 22 161 16 21 12 7 59 133 40 514
Total 27 43 84 61 635 55 68 36 15 176 454 98 1752
08:00 AM 13 12 18 12 144 16 20 16 12 55 153 40 511
08:15 AM 21 12 27 9 162 17 17 11 9 44 128 21 478
08:30 AM 22 11 18 13 133 16 21 9 9 32 130 21 435
08:45 AM 10 17 16 8 164 15 11 17 6 19 124 16 423
Total 66 52 79 42 603 64 69 53 36 150 535 98 1847
04:00 PM 9 10 16 12 121 15 32 17 9 31 203 17 492
04:15 PM 16 11 15 14 138 16 21 12 13 33 174 8 471
04:30 PM 3 10 20 10 137 11 17 14 12 25 186 8 453
04:45 PM 10 10 19 30 122 20 25 19 10 30 205 14 514
Total 38 41 70 66 518 62 95 62 44 119 768 47 1930
05:00 PM 19 15 24 8 132 20 22 20 16 30 203 15 524
05:15 PM 16 17 20 17 155 20 21 14 8 32 223 16 559
05:30 PM 17 11 16 7 122 27 23 12 7 33 213 16 504
05:45 PM 18 11 21 10 131 17 20 13 6 31 203 40 521
Total 70 54 81 42 540 84 86 59 37 126 842 87 2108
Grand Total 201 190 314 211 2296 265 318 210 132 571 2599 330 7637 Apprch % 28.5 27 44.5 7.6 82.8 9.6 48.2 31.8 20 16.3 74.3 9.4 Total % 2.6 2.5 4.1 2.8 30.1 3.5 4.2 2.7 1.7 7.5 34 4.3 Passenger 186 176 293 191 2144 249 290 197 123 545 2456 304 7154 % Passenger 92.5 92.6 93.3 90.5 93.4 94 91.2 93.8 93.2 95.4 94.5 92.1 93.7 Motorcycle 3 3 3 2 10 2 8 2 2 0 9 0 44
% Motorcycle 1.5 1.6 1 0.9 0.4 0.8 2.5 1 1.5 0 0.3 0 0.6 Bus 1 1 0 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 9 6 27
% Bus 0.5 0.5 0 0 0.3 0.4 0 0.5 0 0 0.3 1.8 0.4
2 Axle 10 8 16 15 109 10 17 9 6 21 101 19 341
% 2 Axle 5 4.2 5.1 7.1 4.7 3.8 5.3 4.3 4.5 3.7 3.9 5.8 4.5 3 Axle 1 1 2 3 9 3 2 0 1 2 12 0 36
% 3 Axle 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.4 0.4 1.1 0.6 0 0.8 0.4 0.5 0 0.5 4 Axle 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 9
% 4 Axle 0 0.5 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.5 0 0 0.1 0 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 3 9 1 26
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.3 0 0 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 352 of 484 ends

File Name : SierraAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 2
Sierra Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Sierra Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 8 19 32 59 18 174 9 201 25 10 2 37 50 119 32 201 498 07:45 AM 10 12 21 43 22 161 16 199 21 12 7 40 59 133 40 232 514 08:00 AM 13 12 18 43 12 144 16 172 20 16 12 48 55 153 40 248 511 08:15 AM 21 12 27 60 9 162 17 188 17 11 9 37 44 128 21 193 478 Total Volume 52 55 98 205 61 641 58 760 83 49 30 162 208 533 133 874 2001 % App. Total 25.4 26.8 47.8 8 84.3 7.6 51.2 30.2 18.5 23.8 61 15.2 PHF .619 .724 .766 .854 .693 .921 .853 .945 .830 .766 .625 .844 .881 .871 .831 .881 .973 Passenger 48 50 93 191 58 580 53 691 77 48 28 153 201 501 127 829 1864 % Passenger 92.3 90.9 94.9 93.2 95.1 90.5 91.4 90.9 92.8 98.0 93.3 94.4 96.6 94.0 95.5 94.9 93.2 Motorcycle 0 1 0 1 1 5 1 7 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 10
% Motorcycle 0 1.8 0 0.5 1.6 0.8 1.7 0.9 1.2 0 0 0.6 0 0.2 0 0.1 0.5 Bus 0 1 0 1 0 6 1 7 0 1 0 1 0 4 3 7 16
% Bus 0 1.8 0 0.5 0 0.9 1.7 0.9 0 2.0 0 0.6 0 0.8 2.3 0.8 0.8 2 Axle 4 2 4 10 2 40 2 44 4 0 1 5 5 20 2 27 86
% 2 Axle 7.7 3.6 4.1 4.9 3.3 6.2 3.4 5.8 4.8 0 3.3 3.1 2.4 3.8 1.5 3.1 4.3 3 Axle 0 1 1 2 0 4 1 5 1 0 1 2 1 4 0 5 14
% 3 Axle 0 1.8 1.0 1.0 0 0.6 1.7 0.7 1.2 0 3.3 1.2 0.5 0.8 0 0.6 0.7 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.1 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 9
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0 0.7 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.5 0.4 Sierra Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sierra Avenue
Right
93 0
0 4
1 0
0 98
Thru
50 1
1 2
1 0
0 55
Left
48 0
0 4
0 0
0 52
Out In Total
302 191 493
1 1 2
2 1 3
7 10 17
2 2 4
0 0 0
1 0 1
315 205 520
Right
53 0 0 1 2 1 1
58 Thru
580
6 5
40 5 1 4
641
Left
58 0 0 0 2 0 1
61 Out Total In
577 691 1268
1 7 8 4 7 11
25 44 69
5 5 10 1 1 2 2 5 7
615 1375 760
Left
77 1
0 4
1 0
0 83
Thru
48 0
1 0
0 0
0 49
Right
28 0
0 1
1 0
0 30
Out In Total
235 153 388
2 1 3
4 1 5
6 5 11
1 2 3
0 0 0
1 0 1
249 162 411
Left
201
0 0 5 1 0 1
208
Thru
501
1 4
20 4 1 2
533
Right
127
0 3 2 0 0 1
133
Total Out In
750 829 1579
6 1 7 6 7 13
48 27 75
6 5 11 1 1 2 5 4 9
822 1696 874
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Passenger
Motorcycle
Bus
2 Axle
3 Axle
4 Axle
5+ Axles
Peak
Hour
Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 353 of 484 ends

File Name : SierraAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 3
Sierra Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Sierra Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 19 15 24 58 8 132 20 160 22 20 16 58 30 203 15 248 524 05:15 PM 16 17 20 53 17 155 20 192 21 14 8 43 32 223 16 271 559 05:30 PM 17 11 16 44 7 122 27 156 23 12 7 42 33 213 16 262 504 05:45 PM 18 11 21 50 10 131 17 158 20 13 6 39 31 203 40 274 521 Total Volume 70 54 81 205 42 540 84 666 86 59 37 182 126 842 87 1055 2108 % App. Total 34.1 26.3 39.5 6.3 81.1 12.6 47.3 32.4 20.3 11.9 79.8 8.2 PHF .921 .794 .844 .884 .618 .871 .778 .867 .935 .738 .578 .784 .955 .944 .544 .963 .943 Passenger 65 53 78 196 38 523 82 643 80 57 34 171 121 812 82 1015 2025 % Passenger 92.9 98.1 96.3 95.6 90.5 96.9 97.6 96.5 93.0 96.6 91.9 94.0 96.0 96.4 94.3 96.2 96.1 Motorcycle 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 4 0 4 10
% Motorcycle 2.9 1.9 1.2 2.0 0 0 0 0 1.2 0 2.7 1.1 0 0.5 0 0.4 0.5 Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
% Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.0
2 Axle 3 0 2 5 4 14 1 19 5 2 2 9 4 21 5 30 63
% 2 Axle 4.3 0 2.5 2.4 9.5 2.6 1.2 2.9 5.8 3.4 5.4 4.9 3.2 2.5 5.7 2.8 3.0 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4
% 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 1.2 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 0.2
4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 3
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 0 0 0 0 0.8 0.1 0 0.2 0.1 Sierra Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Sierra Avenue
Right
78 1
0 2
0 0
0 81
Thru
53 1
0 0
0 0
0 54
Left
65 2
0 3
0 0
0 70
Out In Total
260 196 456
0 4 4
0 0 0
7 5 12
1 0 1
0 0 0
1 0 1
269 205 474
Right
82 0 0 1 1 0 0
84 Thru
523
0 0
14 1 1 1
540
Left
38 0 0 0 4 0 0
42 Out Total In
911 643 1554
7 0 7 1 0 1
26 19 45
2 2 4 1 1 2 1 1 2
949 1615 666
Left
80 1
0 5
0 0
0 86
Thru
57 0
0 2
0 0
0 59
Right
34 1
0 2
0 0
0 37
Out In Total
173 171 344
1 2 3
0 0 0
9 9 18
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
183 182 365
Left
121
0 0 4 0 0 1
126
Thru
812
4 1
21 2 1 1
842
Right
82 0 0 5 0 0 0
87 Total Out In
681 1015 1696
2 4 6 0 1 1
21 30 51
1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 3
707 1762 1055
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Passenger
Motorcycle
Bus
2 Axle
3 Axle
4 Axle
5+ Axles
Peak
Hour
Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 354 of 484 ends

File Name : ValleyViewAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24 Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Passenger - Motorcycle - Bus - 2 Axle - 3 Axle - 4 Axle - 5+ Axles Valley View Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Valley View Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Int. Total 07:00 AM 5 0 1 3 163 4 8 0 5 0 104 4 297
07:15 AM 0 0 5 3 215 0 2 0 4 0 138 2 369
07:30 AM 2 0 0 3 234 3 8 0 7 0 138 4 399
07:45 AM 1 0 1 12 202 1 6 1 6 0 143 6 379
Total 8 0 7 21 814 8 24 1 22 0 523 16 1444
08:00 AM 0 2 3 6 165 2 11 0 8 1 153 9 360
08:15 AM 0 0 1 3 175 6 8 0 8 1 138 10 350
08:30 AM 2 0 0 6 189 5 6 2 9 1 156 10 386
08:45 AM 1 1 1 8 164 2 9 0 6 0 130 5 327
Total 3 3 5 23 693 15 34 2 31 3 577 34 1423
04:00 PM 3 1 1 8 154 6 10 2 8 0 235 3 431
04:15 PM 4 2 0 9 161 2 6 0 16 0 213 3 416
04:30 PM 4 0 0 7 170 4 11 1 16 0 215 5 433
04:45 PM 7 1 1 5 166 3 2 7 14 0 239 8 453
Total 18 4 2 29 651 15 29 10 54 0 902 19 1733
05:00 PM 2 2 2 9 186 6 9 2 11 1 248 6 484
05:15 PM 7 1 1 3 193 6 16 1 13 0 254 8 503
05:30 PM 4 1 2 8 183 3 5 3 7 1 270 3 490
05:45 PM 3 1 0 6 184 5 3 2 3 1 236 12 456
Total 16 5 5 26 746 20 33 8 34 3 1008 29 1933
Grand Total 45 12 19 99 2904 58 120 21 141 6 3010 98 6533 Apprch % 59.2 15.8 25 3.2 94.9 1.9 42.6 7.4 50 0.2 96.7 3.1 Total % 0.7 0.2 0.3 1.5 44.5 0.9 1.8 0.3 2.2 0.1 46.1 1.5 Passenger 42 12 15 99 2776 56 111 21 137 6 2883 94 6252 % Passenger 93.3 100 78.9 100 95.6 96.6 92.5 100 97.2 100 95.8 95.9 95.7 Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 30
% Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.5
Bus 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 10 0 20
% Bus 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0.7 0 0.3 0 0.3
2 Axle 3 0 1 0 83 2 8 0 2 0 88 3 190
% 2 Axle 6.7 0 5.3 0 2.9 3.4 6.7 0 1.4 0 2.9 3.1 2.9
3 Axle 0 0 3 0 9 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 18
% 3 Axle 0 0 15.8 0 0.3 0 0.8 0 0.7 0 0.1 0 0.3
4 Axle 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 17
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 1 0.3

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 355 of 484 ends

File Name : ValleyViewAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24 Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 2
Valley View Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Valley View Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 11:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 0 5 5 3 215 0 218 2 0 4 6 0 138 2 140 369
07:30 AM 2 0 0 2 3 234 3 240 8 0 7 15 0 138 4 142 399
07:45 AM 1 0 1 2 12 202 1 215 6 1 6 13 0 143 6 149 379
08:00 AM 0 2 3 5 6 165 2 173 11 0 8 19 1 153 9 163 360
Total Volume 3 2 9 14 24 816 6 846 27 1 25 53 1 572 21 594 1507 % App. Total 21.4 14.3 64.3 2.8 96.5 0.7 50.9 1.9 47.2 0.2 96.3 3.5 PHF .375 .250 .450 .700 .500 .872 .500 .881 .614 .250 .781 .697 .250 .935 .583 .911 .944 Passenger 1 2 6 9 24 767 5 796 23 1 23 47 1 539 20 560 1412 % Passenger 33.3 100 66.7 64.3 100 94.0 83.3 94.1 85.2 100 92.0 88.7 100 94.2 95.2 94.3 93.7 Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 9
% Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 0 0.2 0.6 Bus 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 1 1 0 7 0 7 16
% Bus 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 0 0.9 0 0 4.0 1.9 0 1.2 0 1.2 1.1
2 Axle 2 0 1 3 0 25 1 26 4 0 0 4 0 20 0 20 53
% 2 Axle 66.7 0 11.1 21.4 0 3.1 16.7 3.1 14.8 0 0 7.5 0 3.5 0 3.4 3.5 3 Axle 0 0 2 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 8
% 3 Axle 0 0 22.2 14.3 0 0.4 0 0.4 0 0 4.0 1.9 0 0.3 0 0.3 0.5 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 8
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 4.8 0.7 0.5 Valley View Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Valley View Avenue
Right
6 0
0 1
2 0
0 9
Thru
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
Left
1 0
0 2
0 0
0 3
Out In Total
7 9 16
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 3 4
0 2 2
0 0 0
0 0 0
8 14 22
Right
6 0 0 0 1 0 0 5
Thru
767
8 8
25 4 1 3
816
Left
24 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 Out Total In
563 796 1359
1 8 9 8 8 16
22 26 48
3 3 6 0 1 1 3 4 7
600 1446 846
Left
23 0
0 4
0 0
0 27
Thru
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
Right
23 0
1 0
1 0
0 25
Out In Total
46 47 93
0 0 0
0 1 1
0 4 4
0 1 1
0 0 0
1 0 1
47 53 100
Left
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Thru
539
1 7
20 2 0 3
572
Right
20 0 0 0 0 0 1
21 Total Out In
796 560 1356
8 1 9 8 7 15
30 20 50
5 2 7 1 0 1 4 4 8
852 1446 594
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Passenger
Motorcycle
Bus
2 Axle
3 Axle
4 Axle
5+ Axles
Peak
Hour
Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 356 of 484 ends

File Name : ValleyViewAve_SixthSt_Classification_05-29-24 Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 5/29/2024
Page No : 3
Valley View Avenue
Southbound
Sixth Street
Westbound
Valley View Avenue
Northbound
Sixth Street
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:00 PM
05:00 PM 2 2 2 6 9 186 6 201 9 2 11 22 1 248 6 255 484
05:15 PM 7 1 1 9 3 193 6 202 16 1 13 30 0 254 8 262 503 05:30 PM 4 1 2 7 8 183 3 194 5 3 7 15 1 270 3 274 490
05:45 PM 3 1 0 4 6 184 5 195 3 2 3 8 1 236 12 249 456
Total Volume 16 5 5 26 26 746 20 792 33 8 34 75 3 1008 29 1040 1933 % App. Total 61.5 19.2 19.2 3.3 94.2 2.5 44 10.7 45.3 0.3 96.9 2.8 PHF .571 .625 .625 .722 .722 .966 .833 .980 .516 .667 .654 .625 .750 .933 .604 .949 .961 Passenger 16 5 5 26 26 732 20 778 32 8 33 73 3 978 28 1009 1886 % Passenger 100 100 100 100 100 98.1 100 98.2 97.0 100 97.1 97.3 100 97.0 96.6 97.0 97.6 Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 7
% Motorcycle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0.7 0.4
Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
% Bus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
2 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 1 0 1 2 0 20 1 21 34
% 2 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 1.4 3.0 0 2.9 2.7 0 2.0 3.4 2.0 1.8 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
% 3 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.3 0 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1
4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
% 4 Axle 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
% 5+ Axles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 0 0.1 0.1
Valley View Avenue
Sixth Street
Sixth Street
Valley View Avenue
Right
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
Thru
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 5
Left
16 0
0 0
0 0
0 16
Out In Total
31 26 57
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
31 26 57
Right
20 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 Thru
732
0 0
11 0 1 2
746
Left
26 0 0 0 0 0 0
26 Out Total In
1027 778 1805
7 0 7 1 0 1
21 11 32
0 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 1
1058 1850 792
Left
32 0
0 1
0 0
0 33
Thru
8 0
0 0
0 0
0 8
Right
33 0
0 1
0 0
0 34
Out In Total
59 73 132
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 2 3
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
60 75 135
Left
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Thru
978
7 1
20 0 1 1
1008
Right
28 0 0 1 0 0 0
29 Total Out In
769 1009 1778
0 7 7 0 1 1
12 21 33
2 0 2 1 1 2 0 1 1
784 1824 1040
Peak Hour Begins at 05:00 PM
Passenger
Motorcycle
Bus
2 Axle
3 Axle
4 Axle
5+ Axles
Peak
Hour
Data
North

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 357 of 484 ends

CITY TRAFFIC COUNTERS
WWW.CTCOUNTERS.COM

Page 358 of 484 ends

23 APPENDIX C
ITE Trip Generation

Page 359 of 484 ends

775
Land Use: 937
Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
Description
This land use includes any coffee and donut restaurant that has a drive-through window as well as a walk-in entrance area at which a patron can purchase and consume items. The restaurant sells freshly brewed coffee (along with coffee-related accessories) and a variety of food/drink products such as donuts, bagels, breads, muffins, cakes, sandwiches, wraps, salads, and other hot and cold beverages. The restaurant marketing and sales may emphasize coffee beverages over food (or vice versa).

A coffee/donut shop typically holds long store hours (more than 15 hours) with an early morning opening. Limited indoor seating is generally provided for patrons, but table service is not provided.

Coffee/donut shop without drive-through window (Land Use 936) and coffee/donut shop with drive-through window and no indoor seating (Land Use 938) are related uses.

Additional Data
The sites were surveyed in the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ontario (CAN), Pennsylvania, Quebec (CAN), Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Specialized Land Use Data
One study was conducted during the pandemic in 2020. Twelve sites were counted in Illinois and Missouri during the AM and PM adjacent street peak hours. The data have not been incorporated within the overall ITE trip generation database and are not reflected in the data plots for this land use. Consideration for their inclusion will be given for the 12th Edition of Trip Generation Manual after additional post-pandemic data are collected. Overall, the pandemic counts yielded an AM adjacent street peak weighted average rate of 84 vehicle trips per 1,000 square feet GFA, roughly equivalent to the pre-pandemic average. The PM adjacent street peak rate was 56 (roughly 40 percent higher than the pre-pandemic value). The higher PM peak rate for these coffee/donut shops conforms with anecdotal observations that with the temporary or permanent closures of many restaurants during the pandemic, the drive-through restaurants that were open did a brisk business even during their off-peak periods.

Source Numbers
594, 599, 615, 617, 618, 621, 622, 635, 639, 712, 714, 725, 726, 728, 853, 854, 892, 903, 928, 959, 979, 982, 1004, 1042, 1044
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999)

Page 360 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 6
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
533.57 309.41 - 869.00 243.65
Data Plot and Equation
0 1 2 3 0
1000
2000
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
776 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Page 361 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 78
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

85.88 18.51 - 282.05 44.92
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
400
500
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 777

Page 362 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 36
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

38.99 13.78 - 92.31 17.79
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
778 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Page 363 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
AM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 62
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation
101.27 40.82 - 282.05 41.74
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
400
500
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 779

Page 364 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
PM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 34
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

43.65 18.37 - 92.31 16.74
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
780 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Page 365 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Saturday, Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 9
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 2
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

87.91 48.42 - 138.28 34.34
Data Plot and Equation
0 2 4 6 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 781

Page 366 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 4
Avg. Num. of Seats: 34
Directional Distribution: 52% entering, 48% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

4.31 3.62 - 5.75 0.68
Data Plot and Equation
0 20 40 60 0
100
200
300
Study Site Fitted Curve Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.82 Ln(X) + 2.12 R²= 0.98 X = Number of Seats
T = Trips Ends
782 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Page 367 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 1
Avg. Num. of Seats: 24
Directional Distribution: 45% entering, 55% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

1.50 1.50 - 1.50 ***
Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size
0 10 20 30 0
10 20
30 40
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = Number of Seats
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 783

Page 368 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Weekday,
AM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 4
Avg. Num. of Seats: 34
Directional Distribution: 52% entering, 48% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

Page 369 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Seats
On a: Weekday,
PM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 1
Avg. Num. of Seats: 24
Directional Distribution: 45% entering, 55% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per Seat
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

Page 370 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 10
Avg. AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.: 1786
Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.15 0.05 - 0.29 0.07
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0
100
200
300
400
500
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

T = Trips Ends
786 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Page 371 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

On a: Weekday,
AM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 9
Avg. AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.: 1667
Directional Distribution: 52% entering, 48% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.17 0.10 - 0.29 0.06
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0
100
200
300
400
500
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = AM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 787

Page 372 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 8
Avg. PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.: 1808
Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.06 0.03 - 0.09 0.02
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 2000 3000 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

T = Trips Ends
788 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Page 373 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Vehicle Trip Ends vs: PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

On a: Weekday,
PM Peak Hour of Generator
Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 8
Avg. PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.: 1808
Directional Distribution: 51% entering, 49% exiting
Vehicle Trip Generation per PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

0.06 0.03 - 0.09 0.02
Data Plot and Equation
0 1000 2000 3000 0
100
200
300
Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = PM Peak Hour Traffic on Adj. St.

T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 789

Page 374 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Walk+Bike+Transit Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.

Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban
Number of Studies: 1
Avg. 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA: 4
Directional Distribution: Not Available
Walk+Bike+Transit Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation

6.86 6.86 - 6.86 ***
Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size
0 1 2 3 4 0
10 20
30 Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
790 Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition • Volume 5

Page 375 of 484 ends

Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Through Window
(937)
Walk+Bike+Transit Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.

5.71 5.71 - 5.71 ***
Data Plot and Equation Caution – Small Sample Size
0 1 2 3 4 0
10 20
30 Study Site Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R²= ***
X = 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA
T = Trips Ends
General Urban/Suburban and Rural (Land Uses 800–999) 791

Page 376 of 484 ends

24 APPENDIX D
2024 Existing Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports

Page 377 of 484 ends

Sierra and Sixth
Existing AM Peak 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 208 533 133 61 733 58 83 49 30 52 55 98 Future Volume (vph) 208 533 133 61 733 58 83 49 30 52 55 98 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.970 0.989 0.975 0.936
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.987
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3433 0 1770 3500 0 0 1771 0 0 1721 0 Flt Permitted 0.151 0.324 0.776 0.881
Satd. Flow (perm) 281 3433 0 604 3500 0 0 1409 0 0 1536 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 34 9 12 47
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 226 579 145 66 797 63 90 53 33 57 60 107 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 226 724 0 66 860 0 0 176 0 0 224 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Page 378 of 484 ends

Sierra and Sixth
Existing AM Peak 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 45.9 35.9 34.0 27.0 32.5 30.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.41 0.39 0.31 0.38 0.36
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.50 0.20 0.78 0.33 0.39
Control Delay 18.9 19.6 12.3 32.8 22.1 20.4
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 18.9 19.6 12.3 32.8 22.1 20.4

LOS B B B C C C
Approach Delay 19.5 31.3 22.1 20.4
Approach LOS B C C C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 86.6
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Page 379 of 484 ends

Sixth and Valley View
Existing AM Peak 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 1 593 21 24 816 6 27 1 25 3 2 9
Future Volume (vph) 1 593 21 24 816 6 27 1 25 3 2 9
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.995 0.850 0.936 0.910
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.990
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3522 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1700 0 0 1678 0 Flt Permitted 0.127 0.266 0.899 0.972
Satd. Flow (perm) 237 3522 0 495 1863 1583 0 1567 0 0 1648 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 4 89 27 10
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1484 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 33.7 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1 645 23 26 887 7 29 1 27 3 2 10
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 1 668 0 26 887 7 0 57 0 0 15 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Page 380 of 484 ends

Sixth and Valley View
Existing AM Peak 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 33.6 31.5 34.1 32.9 32.9 32.3 30.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.41 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.42 0.40
v/c Ratio 0.00 0.46 0.08 1.11 0.01 0.08 0.02
Control Delay 10.0 18.7 11.9 90.2 0.0 9.6 10.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.0 18.7 11.9 90.2 0.0 9.6 10.5

LOS A B B F A A B
Approach Delay 18.7 87.3 9.6 10.5
Approach LOS B F A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 76.5
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.11
Intersection Signal Delay: 56.3 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

Page 381 of 484 ends

Sierra and Sixth
Existing PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 131 973 85 44 684 87 89 61 38 70 54 81 Future Volume (vph) 131 973 85 44 684 87 89 61 38 70 54 81 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.988 0.983 0.973 0.947
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.977 0.983
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3497 0 1770 3479 0 0 1771 0 0 1734 0 Flt Permitted 0.182 0.136 0.786 0.839
Satd. Flow (perm) 339 3497 0 253 3479 0 0 1425 0 0 1480 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 10 15 13 34
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 1058 92 48 743 95 97 66 41 76 59 88 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 1150 0 48 838 0 0 204 0 0 223 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Page 382 of 484 ends

Sierra and Sixth
Existing PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 40.4 34.6 33.7 27.0 32.5 30.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.42 0.41 0.33 0.39 0.38
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.78 0.21 0.73 0.36 0.39
Control Delay 14.7 25.8 13.0 28.0 20.5 20.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 14.7 25.8 13.0 28.0 20.5 20.0

LOS B C B C C B
Approach Delay 24.6 27.2 20.5 20.0
Approach LOS C C C B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 82.4
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 24.8 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Page 383 of 484 ends

Valley View and Sixth
Existing PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 1048 30 27 776 21 34 8 35 17 5 5 Future Volume (vph) 3 1048 30 27 776 21 34 8 35 17 5 5
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.996 0.850 0.939 0.976
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.978 0.969
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3525 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1711 0 0 1762 0 Flt Permitted 0.116 0.111 0.897 0.860
Satd. Flow (perm) 216 3525 0 207 1863 1583 0 1569 0 0 1564 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 3 89 38 5
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1484 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 33.7 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 1139 33 29 843 23 37 9 38 18 5 5
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 1172 0 29 843 23 0 84 0 0 28 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Page 384 of 484 ends

Valley View and Sixth
Existing PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 36.7 34.6 37.1 35.8 35.8 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.43 0.47 0.45 0.45 0.41 0.39
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.76 0.13 1.01 0.03 0.13 0.05
Control Delay 10.0 24.3 12.0 56.7 0.1 11.1 15.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 10.0 24.3 12.0 56.7 0.1 11.1 15.7

LOS A C B E A B B
Approach Delay 24.2 53.8 11.1 15.7
Approach LOS C D B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 79.6
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01
Intersection Signal Delay: 35.8 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

Page 385 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
Existing Saturday 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 126 952 97 65 759 74 59 49 52 61 39 93 Future Volume (vph) 126 952 97 65 759 74 59 49 52 61 39 93 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.986 0.987 0.956 0.935
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.982 0.984
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3490 0 1770 3493 0 0 1749 0 0 1714 0 Flt Permitted 0.173 0.127 0.834 0.862
Satd. Flow (perm) 322 3490 0 237 3493 0 0 1485 0 0 1501 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 11 26 49
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 137 1035 105 71 825 80 64 53 57 66 42 101 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 137 1140 0 71 905 0 0 174 0 0 209 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Page 386 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
Existing Saturday 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 41.8 34.5 37.3 30.1 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.41 0.44 0.35 0.38 0.36
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.80 0.30 0.73 0.30 0.36
Control Delay 14.9 28.2 14.2 27.6 18.6 18.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 14.9 28.2 14.2 27.6 18.6 18.5

LOS B C B C B B
Approach Delay 26.8 26.6 18.6 18.5
Approach LOS C C B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 85.1
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
Intersection Signal Delay: 25.5 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Page 387 of 484 ends

Valley View and Sixth
Existing Saturday 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 1047 15 38 874 36 18 1 41 25 4 6 Future Volume (vph) 3 1047 15 38 874 36 18 1 41 25 4 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.908 0.975
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.966
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3532 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1666 0 0 1754 0 Flt Permitted 0.113 0.104 0.938 0.833
Satd. Flow (perm) 210 3532 0 194 1863 1583 0 1587 0 0 1513 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 89 45 7
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1484 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 33.7 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 1138 16 41 950 39 20 1 45 27 4 7
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 1154 0 41 950 39 0 66 0 0 38 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Page 388 of 484 ends

Valley View and Sixth
Existing Saturday 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 37.8 34.6 39.7 38.3 38.3 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.42 0.48 0.47 0.47 0.39 0.37
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.78 0.19 1.09 0.05 0.10 0.07
Control Delay 9.7 26.0 12.5 83.3 0.2 9.0 16.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 9.7 26.0 12.5 83.3 0.2 9.0 16.5

LOS A C B F A A B
Approach Delay 26.0 77.3 9.0 16.5
Approach LOS C E A B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 82.2
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.09
Intersection Signal Delay: 48.4 Intersection LOS: D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

Page 389 of 484 ends

25 APPENDIX E
2025 No-Build Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports

Page 390 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
No-Build AM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 216 554 138 63 762 60 86 51 31 54 57 102 Future Volume (vph) 216 554 138 63 762 60 86 51 31 54 57 102 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.970 0.989 0.975 0.935
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.987
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3433 0 1770 3500 0 0 1771 0 0 1719 0 Flt Permitted 0.139 0.317 0.764 0.885
Satd. Flow (perm) 259 3433 0 590 3500 0 0 1388 0 0 1541 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 33 9 12 48
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 235 602 150 68 828 65 93 55 34 59 62 111 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 235 752 0 68 893 0 0 182 0 0 232 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Page 391 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
No-Build AM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 47.6 37.5 35.0 27.9 32.5 30.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.43 0.40 0.32 0.37 0.35
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.51 0.21 0.80 0.35 0.41
Control Delay 20.7 19.6 12.4 33.8 23.3 21.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 20.7 19.6 12.4 33.8 23.3 21.3

LOS C B B C C C
Approach Delay 19.9 32.3 23.3 21.3
Approach LOS B C C C
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 88.2
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
Intersection Signal Delay: 25.3 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Page 392 of 484 ends

Valley View and Sixth
No-Build AM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Page 393 of 484 ends

Valley View and Sixth
No-Build AM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Page 394 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
No Build PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Page 395 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
No Build PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Page 396 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
No Build PM 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 40.4 34.6 33.7 27.0 32.5 30.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.42 0.41 0.33 0.39 0.38
v/c Ratio 0.44 0.78 0.21 0.73 0.36 0.39
Control Delay 14.7 25.8 13.0 28.0 20.5 20.0
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 14.7 25.8 13.0 28.0 20.5 20.0

Page 397 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
Sat No-Build 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 131 990 101 68 789 77 61 51 54 63 41 97 Future Volume (vph) 131 990 101 68 789 77 61 51 54 63 41 97 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.986 0.987 0.956 0.935
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.982 0.985
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3490 0 1770 3493 0 0 1749 0 0 1716 0 Flt Permitted 0.156 0.126 0.829 0.862
Satd. Flow (perm) 291 3490 0 235 3493 0 0 1476 0 0 1501 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 12 11 26 48
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 1484 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 33.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 1076 110 74 858 84 66 55 59 68 45 105 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 1186 0 74 942 0 0 180 0 0 218 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Page 398 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
Sat No-Build 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 42.5 34.9 37.6 30.4 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.41 0.44 0.36 0.38 0.36
v/c Ratio 0.47 0.83 0.32 0.76 0.31 0.38
Control Delay 15.5 29.5 14.5 28.7 19.1 19.2
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 15.5 29.5 14.5 28.7 19.1 19.2

LOS B C B C B B
Approach Delay 28.0 27.6 19.1 19.2
Approach LOS C C B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 85.6
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.6 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 3: Sierra Ave & Sixth Ave

Page 399 of 484 ends

Valley View and Sixth
Sat No-Build 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 3 1089 16 40 909 37 29 1 27 26 4 6 Future Volume (vph) 3 1089 16 40 909 37 29 1 27 26 4 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 1000 0 0 175 0 0 0 0
Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.998 0.850 0.937 0.976
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.965
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3532 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1702 0 0 1754 0 Flt Permitted 0.113 0.104 0.883 0.832
Satd. Flow (perm) 210 3532 0 194 1863 1583 0 1541 0 0 1513 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2 89 29 7
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 1484 553 694 618
Travel Time (s) 33.7 12.6 15.8 14.0
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3 1184 17 43 988 40 32 1 29 28 4 7
Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 3 1201 0 43 988 40 0 62 0 0 39 0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 6

Page 400 of 484 ends

Valley View and Sixth
Sat No-Build 09/05/2024
Scenario 1 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 2 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9.5 22.5 10.6 23.6 23.6 22.5 22.5 23.6 23.6 Total Split (s) 25.4 38.4 25.4 38.4 38.4 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 Total Split (%) 25.4% 38.4% 25.4% 38.4% 38.4% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% 36.2% Maximum Green (s) 21.4 34.4 19.8 32.8 32.8 32.2 32.2 30.6 30.6 Yellow Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.6
All-Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 5.6 5.6 5.6 4.0 5.6
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max Max Max
Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Act Effct Green (s) 37.8 34.6 39.8 38.3 38.3 32.4 30.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.42 0.48 0.47 0.47 0.39 0.37
v/c Ratio 0.01 0.81 0.20 1.14 0.05 0.10 0.07
Control Delay 9.7 27.4 12.6 99.6 0.3 11.8 16.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 9.7 27.4 12.6 99.6 0.3 11.8 16.6

LOS A C B F A B B
Approach Delay 27.4 92.4 11.8 16.6
Approach LOS C F B B
Intersection Summary
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 100
Actuated Cycle Length: 82.2
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.14
Intersection Signal Delay: 56.1 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15
Splits and Phases: 6: Valley View Ave & Sixth Ave

Page 401 of 484 ends

26 APPENDIX F
2025 Build Conditions Capacity Analysis Reports

Page 402 of 484 ends

Sixth and Sierra
AM Peak Build 09/05/2024
AM Peak Hour Build Condition 1:31 pm 07/12/2024 Baseline Synchro 11 Report

Page 1 ends

Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 216 606 138 73 814 80 86 51 41 54 57 102 Future Volume (vph) 216 606 138 73 814 80 86 51 41 54 57 102 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.972 0.987 0.969 0.935
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.976 0.987
Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3440 0 1770 3493 0 0 1762 0 0 1719 0 Flt Permitted 0.114 0.288 0.767 0.883
Satd. Flow (perm) 212 3440 0 536 3493 0 0 1384 0 0 1538 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes
Satd. Flow (RTOR) 30 11 16 48
Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30
Link Distance (ft) 558 470 702 626
Travel Time (s) 12.7 10.7 16.0 14.2
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 235 659 150 79 885 87 93 55 45 59 62 111 Shared Lane Traffic (%)
Lane Group Flow (vph) 235 809 0 79 972 0 0 193 0 0 232 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100
Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6
Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94
Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6
Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex
Detector 2 Channel
Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6
Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Page 403 of 484 ends

Norco City CouncilMay 7, 2025

Norco City Council
May 7, 2025