Cities Index.
Agenda

Norco City Council
May 20, 2026

Document
Agenda
Meeting
May 20, 2026
Body
Norco City Council
Pages
695
Original file
50.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on norco.civicweb.net. That file is the official record.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE CONTINUED
Child Guidance Center, Child Abuse Program - LMFT
(10/1999 – 03/2003)
• Conducted individual and family therapy in Spanish and English. • Intake assessment and treatment planning for Social Services Agency referred clients with issues of domestic violence and child abuse.
• Provide supervision to MFT interns.
• Testify in family and juvenile court.
• Attend group and individual supervision and collaboration. • Teach parent education classes.

KPMG Peat Marwick
(08/1994 – 03/1998)
Senior Consultant
• Facilitated focus group sessions with management and user groups. • Interviewed management and functional groups for needs assessment and problem resolution. • Developed strategic plans and current systems assessments. • Reviewed business processes and coordinate transition planning including test plan development. • Lead EDP audits and feasibility studies for public service agencies.

Clients included:

City & County of San Francisco Orange County Health Care Agency City of Pasadena Washoe County Regional Transportation Commission City of Rialto San Diego Department of Health and Human Services City of Vacaville San Jose Redevelopment Agency
City of Tucson Los Angeles Department of Education
City of Palo Alto Oregon Department of Education
City of Beverly Hills
ACS/Xerox
(06/1992 – 08/1994)
Project Manager
• Supervised and coordinated regional technical resource personnel. • Managed multiple projects for various municipalities. • Managed transformation process for implementing new systems and procedural documentation. • Interviewed agency and department heads for developing strategic long-range plans.

Clients included:

City of Orange City of Chino City of Bellflower
City of Milpitas City of National City City of Santa Clara

Page 2 ends

LEANNE HART

Page 437 of 695 ends

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE CONTINUED
Paciolan Systems
09/1989 – 06/1990)
Account Manager
• Performed on-site customer needs analysis and software implementation. • Developed and conducted personalized and classroom training. • Managed all facets of customer accounts.

McDonnell Douglas FSC
(07/1988 – 09/1989)
Programmer
• Designed, implemented and programmed budget system.
• Supported users and maintained contracts/billing, accounts payable, general ledger and fixed assets systems.

EDUCATION
University of California, Irvine
• Bachelor of Arts – Spanish Major
Emphasis in Bilingualism and English as a Second Language Pepperdine University
• Master of Arts – Clinical Psychology
Emphasis in Marriage, Family and Child Counseling

Page 3 ends

LEANNE HART

Page 438 of 695 ends

EXPERIENCE SUMMARY
Accomplished local government executive with multi-departmental management experience including extensive firsthand experience in the following complex areas:
budget, finance, labor negotiations, human resources, procurement, risk management, and information technology.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
SDI Presence
(03/2022 - Present)
ERP Project Manager
Responsible for ensuring that solutions implemented satisfy the business requirements, meet contracted requirements, and deliver the value required by the client. Monitor the Scope of Work, Project plan, schedule, and budget and ensure that deliverables and milestones are met and that the project is completed on time, within budget, and to the customer’s satisfaction.

PREVIOUS TO SDI
Misty Cheng & Associates: City of Upland
(11/2021 – 2/2022)
Finance Consultant
Short term project to assist the City of Upland with American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds:
• Calculated City’s revenue loss incurred during COVID pandemic to determine eligible categories of spending under ARPA
• Categorized and labeled city revenues across all funds according to the U.S.

Treasury Department’s requirements
• Submitted first quarterly report detailing revenue loss that occurred during the pandemic and allowable expenditures and obligations incurred during the first quarter of the ARPA program
City of San Bernardino
(11/2019 – 5/2021)
Interim Deputy City Manager
As a key member of the City Manager’s executive team, provided complex technical and analytical support, as well as management support, to the City Manager and Council on a wide range of issues.
• Provided oversight and support to Finance Director on budget preparation and analysis
• Assisted City Manager with review and editing of various staff reports as needed

RITA CONRAD
Senior Project Manager

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
• Project Management
• Budget and Finance
• Procurement
• Human Resources
• Administration
• Risk Management
• Quality Assurance
• Customer Service

CONNECT
ON LINKEDIN!

Page 439 of 695 ends

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE CONTINUED
• Key member of City Manager’s team for the development of Measure S (quarter cent sales tax): prepared staff reports related to ballot initiative, prepared expenditure policy related to Measure S, and prepared policy for Measure S Citizens’ Oversight Committee
• Coordinated comprehensive user fee study and presented results to the Mayor and Council • Prepared administrative polices for Council consideration: Use of City Insignia and Seal; Elected Officials Interaction with Staff; and Policy for Elected Officials to Place Items on Council Agenda City of San Bernardino
(1/2019 – 6/2019)
Interim Finance Director
As a key member of the City Manager’s executive team, provided complex technical and analytical support, as well as management support, to the City Manager and Council on a wide range of municipal finance issues. • Managed staff of twenty-three (23) in the following areas: purchasing and contracting, budget preparation, accounting, payroll, accounts payable, accounts receivable, business license, TOT collections, treasury, and investments
• Also responsible for City’s overall fiscal management including all financial projections, financial analyses for all operations, budget preparation and management, and annual audit City of La Quinta
(5/2014 – 7/2016)
Finance Director
As a key member of the City Manager’s executive team, provided complex technical and analytical support, as well as management support, to the City Manager and Council on a wide range of municipal finance issues. • Managed staff of six in the following areas: purchasing, budget preparation, accounting, payroll, Successor Agency activities, accounts payable, accounts receivable, animal license, business license, and TOT collections • Also responsible for City’s overall fiscal management including all financial projections, analyses for all operations, budget preparation and management, and annual audit • Served as City’s Treasurer, responsible for all investment activity and preparation of quarterly investment and treasurer’s reports for the Investment Advisory Board (IAB) • Served as Treasurer to the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency City of Hemet
(2/2010 – 3/2014)
Deputy City Manager
As a key member of the City Manager’s executive team, provided complex technical and analytical support, as well as management support, to the City Manager and Council on a wide range of municipal issues. Responsible for management of the following areas (these departments do not have directors; nineteen employees total):
• Human Resources – managed staff of three in the following areas: recruitment, benefits administration, labor negotiations (7 bargaining units), workers comp, MOU administration, and various personnel issues • Risk Management – served as City’s Risk Manager: coordinated handling of claims with third party administrator, city departments, and city attorney
• Information Technology – managed staff of four in the following areas: business applications, public safety applications and communications, GIS, networking, and data communications • Water Billing & Customer Service – Managed staff of four, responsible for the following: water, sewer and storm drain billing and collections; water customer service, and central cashiering

Page 2 ends

RITA CONRAD

Page 440 of 695 ends

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE CONTINUED • Finance – managed staff of eight in the following areas: purchasing, budget preparation, accounting, payroll, assessment district administration, and business license City of San Bernardino
(12/2002 – 2/2010 and 12/1993 – 5/2002)
Deputy Director of Finance
(Positions prior to 2002 include Budget Manager & Admin. Analyst-total 15 years with City) Provided complex technical and analytical support to the Director of Finance, City Manager and Council on a wide range of municipal issues. Responsibilities included:
• Managed staff of 14 in the following areas: accounting, budget, purchasing, payroll, & print shop • Under direction of Finance Director, primary responsibility for coordinating citywide budget process • Routinely provide financial and analytical support to City Manager including review of agenda items • Served as member of City’s labor negotiations team

EDUCATION
California State University / 1999
• Masters in Public Administration
California State University / 1991
• Bachelor of Arts in Economics

ACCOMPLISHMENTS
SKILLS
• Provided staff reports, financial analyses and presentations for Mayor & Council and the community to consider tax (La Quinta, San Bernardino)
• Developed and implemented plan to upgrade City’s aging IT infrastructure (including development of RFP) and begin migration from Novell to Microsoft (Hemet)
• Participated in numerous community workshops related to budget and city services and public presentations to City Council as well as closed session presentations (Hemet, La Quinta & San Bernardino) • Key member of City team responsible for organizing process related to possible contracting out of Fire and EMS (labor negotiations, analysis of proposals, and presentations to Council – Hemet • Key member of City team responsible for privatization of City’s refuse operation resulting in ongoing revenue of $2.7 million annually); member of team negotiating employee transition with SEIU members (Hemet) • Audited and corrected City’s method of charging costs to Assessment Districts, Development Impact Fee (DIF) funds, and enterprise funds (Hemet)
• Oversight of RFP process for health insurance broker services; member of city evaluation team (Hemet & San Bernardino)
• Reorganized Finance Department (Finance & Utility Billing) to accommodate citywide downsizing while increasing efficiencies (Hemet). Reorganized Department providing growth opportunities and succession planning (La Quinta)

Page 3 ends

RITA CONRAD

Page 441 of 695 ends

EXPERIENCE SUMMARY
Ms. Ganley has joined SDI as a Senior Consultant, bringing over 25 years of experience overseeing a wide breadth of complex human resources, payroll, and financial functions in the Public Sector. She has participated in the selection, configuration, data conversion, testing, and implementation of several ERP platforms including Oracle, Finance Plus, and Central Square. She has significant expertise using Cognos Analytics to both create human resources and payroll reports and develop report writing documentation for Human Resources, Payroll, and IT staff.

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
SDI Presence LLC (October 2023 – present)
Since joining SDI in 2023, Ms. Ganley has been providing consulting services for several SDI clients on a variety of projects. Specific work activities include:
• ERP/HCM Procurements: City of Downey; East Bay Parks District • Data Extraction/Reporting: City of Indio; City of Benicia • Data Governance: City of Sacramento
• Project Management: City of Benicia ERP Post Implementation Activities • Training Plan Development: City of Sacramento; Inland Empire Utilities Agency City of Santa Clarita (2006 – 2022)
The City of Santa Clarita has a population of 224,593. Most recently Ms. Ganley held the position of Labor Relations Administrator. Pervious positions included Senior Human Resources Analyst and Senior Financial Analyst. She was responsible for planning, implementing, and overseeing the full scope of human resources programs.

Accomplishments include:
• ERP Implementation: Partnered with Technology Services to implement Finance Plus in 2006 and Central Square in 2021/2022; met with consultants to develop a needs assessment and business process review document; led efforts to convert and upload Finance Plus data into Central Square; collaborated with Technology Services and Payroll to configure, test, and implement the HR/Payroll module; and was the point person to develop reports for Human Resources and Payroll using Cognos Analytics.
• Supervision and Leadership: Supervised employees responsible for performing recruitment and selection; benefit administration, leaves of absence, workers’ compensation, and classification and compensation functions. • Recruitment and Selection: Oversaw selection and recruitment efforts including partnering with hiring managers through the selection and hiring process to identify strategic ways to fill organizational vacancies. • Benefits and Leaves of Absence Administration: Oversaw benefit plans including CalPERS pension, medical, dental, vision, life insurance, deferred compensation, and flexible spending accounts. Managed leaves of absence incidents including FMLA, CFRA, Pregnancy Disability, and State Disability programs.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE
• Human Resources Systems
• Benefits Administration
• Payroll Systems
• ERP Implementation
• Workforce Analytics
• HR Process Reengineering
• Public Sector Budgeting
• Data Extraction & Reporting

CERTIFICATIONS
• Professional Designation in
Human Resources
Management
• Certified Professional in
Human Resources (PHR)
• HR Certification Institute
(HRCI)

CONNECT
ON LINKEDIN!

KELLI GANLEY
Senior Consultant

Page 442 of 695 ends
Page 2 ends

Kelli Ganley
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE CONTINUED • Budgeting: Partnered with department managers and directors to prepare a Citywide budget including developing budget proposals, preparing expenditure and revenue forecasts, and creating annual budget documents.
• Employee and Labor Relations: Partnered with managers and directors to investigate and resolve employee and labor relations issues including poor performance, discrimination and harassment claims, hostile work environment, and policy violations.
• Classification and Compensation: Performed classification and compensation studies to identify strategic and financially prudent approaches to staffing to help divisions meet their operational goals.

City of Burbank (1999 – 2006)
Fiscal Operations Supervisor
The City of Burbank has a population of over 100,000 with an annual budget of approximately $800MM. Responsible for managing and leading the fiscal operations teams responsible for performing payroll, accounts payable, and accounts receivable functions for a full-service city with 1,400 full-time employees and 7 bargaining units.

Accomplishments include:
• ERP Implementation: Acted as Project Administrator for the citywide ERP implementation including coordinating project demos; interviewing and selecting vendors; and configuring, testing, and implementing Payroll and Accounts Payable modules on an Oracle platform. • Supervision and Leadership: Supervised employees responsible for payroll, accounts payable, and accounts receivable functions.
• Benefits Administration: Administered the City’s CalPERS’ Retirement Plan, §457 Deferred Compensation Plan, the §125 Employee Benefit Plan, and the VEBA plan, including contracting with providers, updating plan documents to incorporate IRS legislation, and communicating plan benefits to employees and labor union representatives.
• Cost Analysis: Performed complex analysis and cost calculations for proposed benefits, salary enhancements, and financial programs.
• Policy Oversight: Implemented City policies, procedures, and programs to enhance organizational efficiencies as well as to ensure compliance with Federal and State laws and City MOUs.

EDUCATION and LICENSES
UCLA – BA in Business Economics
California State University, Northridge – Master of Public Administration (MPA) Professional Designation in Human Resources Management
Certified Professional in Human Resources (PHR)
HR Certification Institute (HRCI)
SKILLS
SKIL Functional:
• Recruitment and Selection
• Leaves of Absence and Benefits Administration
• Needs Assessment and Business Process Review
• Payroll Processing and Reporting
• Public Sector Budgeting
• Employee and Labor Relations
Technical:
• Oracle, Finance Plus, and Central Square
• Data Conversion and Validation
• Configuration, Testing, and Implementation
• Cognos Analytics 11.1 Report Writing
• SSRS Report Writing

Page 443 of 695 ends

COST
City of Norco
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Consulting Services October 2, 2025
Respectfully Submitted By:

Patrick Griffin
Managing Director
[email protected]
714-975-4150

Page 444 of 695 ends

Proposal to City of Norco for
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Consulting Services October 2, 2025 Page 2
Project Cost
City Phases 1 & 2
Stages 1 – 5 New System Procurement
SDI developed our project cost estimate based on our years of experience completing projects of a similar scope. Based on the City’s RFP, research regarding the City size and structure, and our past experience with similar projects, we estimate that the Procurement phase will require 513 hours to complete for a total cost of $113,675. SDI’s all-inclusive rates (inclusive of travel and related expenses) are as follows:
$240 per hour for Delivery Executive; $225 per hour for Project Manager; and $215 per hour for Project Consultants. Provided below is a table presenting the level of effort and cost by Stage for the ERP Procurement project.

Task Description Hours Cost
Stage 1 – Initiate 15 $ 3,820
Stage 2 – Requirements 276 $ 64,445
Total Phase 1 291 $ 63,635
Stage 3 - Request for Proposal (RFP) 34 $ 7,680
Stage 4 – Select 152 $ 34,230
Stage 5 - Negotiate 36 $ 8,130
Total Phase 2 222 $ 50,040
Grand Total – ERP Procurement 513 $ 113,675
SDI typically invoices clients for actual hours worked in the prior month, with details outlining the SDI resources and the time spent on project activities. Utilizing this approach provides the City an opportunity to regularly direct SDI resources toward project activities that are the most critical. Also, this approach provides an opportunity for the City to potentially retain funds in the event SDI does not utilize the full project budget.

City Phase 3
Stages 6 - 7 New System Implementation
The following assumptions were utilized when developing our cost proposal for project management services during new system implementation:
24-month (104 week) implementation timeline
20 hours per week of Project Manager services
Hybrid of onsite and offsite work during Project Management activities 1 hour per week of Delivery Executive oversight
Based on these assumptions, the total number of hours to complete the implementation portion of the project is 2,184 hours for project management and oversight. Utilizing the same rates as provided in the Procurement portion of the project ($240 per hour for Project Manager and $225 for Delivery Executive) yields a total cost of $492,960 for project management services during the 24-month implementation period.

There are a number of variables that will likely affect the actual level of effort required to provide project management services during new system implementation, including for example, the availability of the software vendor to implement, potential changes in City staffing, and unforeseen changes to the vendor project team or project scope. Because it is difficult to determine the actual number of hours that will be

Page 445 of 695 ends

Proposal to City of Norco for
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System Consulting Services October 2, 2025 Page 3
needed for implementation activities, SDI recommends that the City consider establishing an overall implementation project budget and allow SDI to bill monthly for actual hours worked in the previous month. This allows the City and SDI to focus our efforts on the areas of greatest need and manage SDI resources to maximize effectiveness. SDI only invoices for actual services provided, so any hours that are not consumed in support of this project are not invoiced to the City.

Page 446 of 695 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 20, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.G.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Department: Community Operations
SUBJECT:

Order of Procedure and Approve Resolutions Necessary for the Annual Assessment Levy Continuing Landscape Maintenance Districts No. 1 – Beazer, Tract 28765; No. 2 – Western Pacific, Tract 25779; No. 3 – Centex, Tract 28626; No. 4 – Norco Ridge Ranch, Tracts 29588 and 29589; and No. 5 – Hawk’s Crest, Tract 30230 RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt the following Resolutions approving the Preliminary Engineer’s Reports and the additional Resolutions providing for an Annual Levy of Assessments and setting the Public Hearing date for June 3, 2026, for each District.

Resolution No. 2026-26, LMD No. 1 (Beazer); Resolution No. 2026-27, LMD No. 2 (Western Pacific); Resolution No. 2026-28, LMD No. 3 (Centex); Resolution No. 2026-29, LMD No. 4 (Norco Ridge Ranch); Resolution No. 2026-30, LMD No. 5 (Hawk’s Crest), approving the Engineer’s Preliminary Report for the Annual Levy of Assessments for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 in said Districts; Resolution No. 2026-31, LMD No. 1 (Beazer); Resolution No. 2026-32, LMD No. 2 (Western Pacific); Resolution No. 2026-33, LMD No. 3 (Centex); Resolution No. 2026-34, LMD No. 4 (Norco Ridge Ranch); Resolution No. 2026-35, LMD No. 5 (Hawk’s Crest), Declaring City’s Intention to Provide for an Annual Levy and Collection of Assessments for Certain Maintenance in an Existing District, and Setting a Time and Place for the Public Hearing.

SUMMARY:

As stipulated in the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” the continuation of an existing maintenance district assessment must be reviewed and approved each fiscal year. The attached resolutions provide for the proper continuation of the Districts as well as the assessments. The proposed 5% increase in Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and the CPI increases in Landscape Maintenance Districts No. 2 through No. 5 will

Page 447 of 695 ends

not require a majority protest vote from the property owners since the increase in assessments was allowed for in the formation of the Districts.

BACKGROUND:

The “Landscaping and Lighting Act" of 1972 requires that an Engineer’s Report for existing landscape maintenance districts (LMDs) must be reviewed and approved annually to continue assessments for the districts. The formation of LMD No. 1 allows the Maximum Assessment Rate to increase by 5% annually. The Maximum Assessment Rates for the remaining four districts increase annually by the percentage increase of the Local Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario California Area for All Urban Consumers from March to March. The Annual CPI increase for March 2026 is 3.09%.

Each district will only assess the amount necessary to cover the costs in that district, so levying at the Maximum Assessment Rate may or may not be required during any fiscal year. The tables below show both the current year and the prior year Maximum Assessment Rate, as well as the rate that will be applied for the current fiscal year. At no time, will any district be assessed an amount greater than the Maximum Assessment Rate.

Maximum Allowable Assessment Rates
District FY 25-26 FY 26-27 FY 26-27
% Increase
LMD No. 1 $200.82 $210.86 5.00%
LMD No. 2 $893.28 $920.87 3.09%
LMD No. 3 $1,337.91 $1,379.24 3.09%
LMD No. 4 $1,422.39 $1,466.33 3.09%
LMD No. 4 (Mt.

Shasta - 25 Parcels) $1,422.39 $1,466.33 3.09%
LMD No. 5 $1,496.51 $1,542.74 3.09%
Applied Rate
District FY 25-26 FY 26-27 Difference FY 26-27
% Increase
LMD No. 1 $200.82 $210.86 $10.04 5.00%
LMD No. 2 $893.28 $920.86 $27.58 3.09%
LMD No. 3 $1,337.90 $1,379.24 $41.34 3.09%
LMD No. 4 $943.98 $1,126.54 $182.56 19.34%
LMD No. 4 (Mt.

Shasta - 25
Parcels)
$207.32 $247.42 $40.10 19.34%
LMD No. 5 $1,419.78 $1,514.78 $95.00 6.69%
The following information applies to each Landscape Maintenance District as designated:

Page 448 of 695 ends

Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
On February 3, 1999, City Council adopted Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 for Tract 28765 (Beazer Homes) comprised of 67 lots. The District was formed to maintain landscaping along the River Road frontage of the tract. The maximum assessment rate will be applied to this district due to the lack of reserves. Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) will not be scheduled for this district at this time.

Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
On January 27, 2000, the City Council established Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 for Tract No. 25799 (Western Pacific), consisting of 219 assessable lots. The district provides for the maintenance and preservation of landscaping improvements along Norco Hills Road and Hidden Valley Parkway, as well as selected interior slopes, wetlands, equestrian trails, and Norco Hills Park, helping to maintain the district’s aesthetic appeal and recreational amenities.

In 2023, the Proposition 218 ballot measure to increase funding for the district was not approved. In response, the City implemented several cost-management measures to maintain the long-term financial stability of the district, including the removal of playground equipment at Norco Hills Park that had exceeded its useful life, as well as the removal of the temporary restroom facility to reduce ongoing operational and incidental costs.

To support continued maintenance services and improve the district’s financial position, the maximum allowable assessment rate will be levied this year. While Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) are not currently scheduled, the district is taking important steps toward future improvements. In 2025, a traffic study determined that certain landscaped areas within the district provide a general benefit to the broader community and should therefore be funded by the City’s General Fund. The identified general benefit areas include the landscaped slopes and parkway along Hidden Valley Parkway, as well as the landscaped frontage along Norco Hills Road between Hidden Valley Parkway and Parkview Drive. This determination does not include equestrian trail maintenance. As a result, $91,864 will be funded from the City's General Fund for the shared community benefit. Beginning this fiscal year, the district will begin gradually rebuilding Operating and Capital reserves to support future capital improvement projects and enhance long-term service sustainability.

Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
On June 6, 2001, the City Council established Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 for Tract 28626 (Centex), consisting of 82 lots. The district was created to ensure the longterm care and enhancement of landscaping improvements along Norco Hills Road, designated interior slopes, and equestrian trails, contributing to the overall aesthetics, functionality, and character of the district.

In 2023, a Proposition 218 ballot measure to increase funding for the district was conducted but was not approved. To maintain service levels and support long-term financial sustainability, the City completed a traffic study in 2025. The study determined that a portion of the district’s landscape maintenance costs provides a general benefit to

Page 449 of 695 ends

the broader community; accordingly, those costs are appropriately supported by the City’s General Fund.

The general benefit area includes the landscaped parkway and slope along Norco Hills Road between Parkview Drive and Valley Drive. As a result, $32,270 will be funded from the City's General Fund for the shared community benefit. Beginning this fiscal year, the district will begin gradually rebuilding Operating and Capital reserves to support future capital improvement projects and enhance long-term service sustainability. Given current reserve levels, the maximum allowable assessment rate will be applied, and CIP projects are not currently scheduled; however, this approach establishes a more stable foundation for future CIP projects and long-term district sustainability.

Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
On October 2, 2002, the City Council established Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 for Tracts 29588 and 29589 (Norco Ridge Ranch), consisting of 557 developed singlefamily residential lots, including 25 lots that receive trail maintenance-only benefits, as well as five undeveloped lots, for a total of 562 assessable lots. The District was formed to provide for the ongoing maintenance, operation, and enhancement of landscaped and open space improvements throughout the District, including irrigated and nonirrigated slopes, fuel modification areas, parkway landscaping, equestrian trails, natural open space and wetland areas, and Ridge Ranch Park. These improvements contribute to the District’s aesthetic character, public safety, environmental sustainability, and overall quality of life.

The Acacia plant material located on the Crestview Drive and Valley Drive slopes is now more than 25 years old and has exceeded its anticipated useful life. The existing vegetation is experiencing substantial decline, including dieback and excessive woody growth, resulting in increased maintenance demands associated with trimming, vegetation management, and irrigation inefficiencies. As the plant material continues to deteriorate, the associated irrigation infrastructure has also become less effective and more costly to maintain.

To address these conditions, the City has initiated planning efforts for a phased slope rehabilitation program. The proposed approach includes the systematic removal of deteriorated vegetation in manageable sections, repair and enhancement of irrigation infrastructure where necessary, and restoration of the slopes through hydroseeding utilizing a California native plant palette. This rehabilitation strategy is intended to improve long-term slope stability and health, reduce ongoing maintenance requirements, increase irrigation efficiency, and establish a more sustainable and drought-tolerant landscape environment.

In support of these future improvements, the District will begin establishing reserve funding for the upcoming Capital Improvement Project known as the Crestview Drive and Valley Drive Slope Revitalization Project. Although the maximum allowable assessment rate will not be levied, an assessment increase of 19.34% is proposed for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to begin funding this long-term infrastructure and landscape rehabilitation effort. This proactive funding approach will assist in preserving District assets, improving operational efficiency, and ensuring the continued maintenance and enhancement of District improvements in a fiscally responsible manner.

Page 450 of 695 ends

Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
On January 7, 2004, the City Council established Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 for Tract 30230 (Hawks Crest), consisting of 50 assessable lots. The District was formed to provide for the ongoing maintenance, operation, and enhancement of exterior slopes, parkway landscaping, equestrian trails, two park parcels, and Hawks Crest Park. These improvements contribute to the District’s overall aesthetic character, functionality, and recreational amenities.

To support the continued maintenance and enhancement of District assets, the City will begin setting aside Capital Improvement Project (CIP) reserves during the upcoming fiscal year. These reserves are intended to fund future parkway irrigation improvements, including the conversion of portions of the existing irrigation system to drip irrigation technology to improve water efficiency, reduce maintenance demands, and support long-term landscape sustainability.

The proposed Capital Improvement Project also includes the removal and replacement of existing fencing with new commercial-grade white vinyl fencing, modifications and upgrades to existing irrigation infrastructure, installation of drip irrigation components, and restoration of all disturbed areas upon project completion. Collectively, these improvements are intended to enhance operational efficiency, improve the long-term sustainability of landscaped areas, and preserve the visual character and appearance of the District.

Although the maximum allowable assessment rate will not be levied, an assessment increase of 6.69% is proposed for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to begin funding the planned white vinyl fencing and irrigation improvement projects.

Below is a summary of the Operating and CIP Reserve fund information for all five Districts:

District FY 26-27
Budget
Beginning
Reserve & CIP
Fund Balance
Reserve & CIP
Fund
Collection &
Contribution
Ending
Reserve & CIP
Fund Balance
LMD No. 1 $14,128 (7,500) $189 ($7,311)
LMD No. 2 $201,671 $20,177 $124,891 $145,068
LMD No. 3 $113,099 $17,781 $41,224 $59,005
LMD No. 4 $605,507 $329,398 $75,000 $404,398
LMD No. 5 $75,739 $67,675 $22,546 $90,221
The Engineer’s Report includes the estimated fund balance for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2026, and the cash flow funding needs. Each district requires a six-month cash flow reserve to sustain the District from the beginning of the fiscal year (July 1) until the City receives from the County of Riverside, its first assessment payment, six months later. If the City does not have this reserve, the general fund reserves must “carry” the District.

The “estimated unfunded needs” is the difference between the “fund balance” and the “needs.”

Page 451 of 695 ends

Below is a summary of the services provided in each maintenance district:

District Trails Parkway
Maintenance
Slope
Maintenance
Park
Maintenance
Wetland
Maintenance
LMD No. 1*
LMD No. 2 X X** X X
LMD No. 3 X Some X
LMD No. 4 X Some X X X
LMD No.
4*** X
LMD No. 5 X X X X
*River Road Landscaping Only
**Slope on Hidden Valley Parkway
***Lots TR 29588-1 (Mt. Shasta - 25 Parcels) Receive Trail & Slope Maintenance Only. This subdivision is not contiguous with the majority of Norco Ridge Ranch.

The observation line item for each District funds the LMD Inspector. The observation line item is broken into percentages based on the size and demand of the District. The breakdown is as follows:

Landscape Maintenance District Percentage of Observance Cost LMD No. 1 5%
LMD No. 2 25%
LMD No. 3 20%
LMD No. 4 35%
LMD No. 5 15%
The City’s Landscape Maintenance Districts continue to provide essential, long-term maintenance and enhancement of landscaped areas, equestrian trails, and open space in the districts. The Preliminary Engineer’s Reports for each district have been prepared to support the continued delivery of these services in a transparent, equitable, and fiscally responsible manner.

The attached Resolutions approve the Preliminary Engineer’s Reports for each Landscape Maintenance District, along with the accompanying Resolutions declaring the intention to levy annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2026–27 through each district.

These actions ensure the continued funding necessary to maintain district services and preserve the quality of improvements within each area.

Additionally, a Public Hearing date of June 3, 2026, has been set for each district to consider the annual levy of assessments. This hearing will provide property owners within each district the opportunity to review the proposed assessments and provide input prior to final consideration and adoption.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Page 452 of 695 ends

The General Fund will contribute $91,864.08 for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 and $32,269.54 for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3, for a total fiscal impact of $124,133.62. These amounts reflect the portion of landscape maintenance costs determined to provide a general benefit to the broader community. The total General Fund contribution will be reflected in the Park Maintenance Budget (737 – Contractual Services).

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This agenda item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 3, "Economic Development and Financial Stability"
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

FY 26-27 Norco LMD No. 1_Engineer's Report
FY 26-27 Norco LMD No. 2_Engineer's Report
FY 26-27 Norco LMD No. 3_Engineer's Report
FY 26-27 Norco LMD No. 4_Engineer's Report
FY 26-27 Norco LMD No. 5_Engineer's Report
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-26_LMD 1_Approving Preliminary Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. 2026-27_LMD 2_Approving Preliminary Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. 2026-28_LMD 3_Approving Preliminary Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. 2026-29_LMD 4_Approving Preliminary Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. 2026-30_LMD 5 _Approving Preliminary Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. 2026-31_LMD_1_Setting Public Hearing
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-32_LMD_2_Setting Public Hearing
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-33_LMD_3_Setting Public Hearing
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-34_LMD_4_Setting Public Hearing
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-35_LMD_5_Setting Public Hearing

Page 453 of 695 ends

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
City of Norco
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Beazer)
Prepared For
May 2026

Page 454 of 695 ends

Table of Contents
Sections
Section i. Engineer’s Statement ________________________________________________________ i Section 1. Plans and Specifications ______________________________________________________1 Section 2. Cost Estimate ______________________________________________________________2 Section 3. Method of Apportionment ___________________________________________________4 Section 4. Assessment________________________________________________________________7 Section 5. Assessment Diagram ________________________________________________________8 Tables
Table 2-1. Budget Details _____________________________________________________________3 Appendices
Appendix A. Assessment Roll __________________________________________________________A-1 Appendix B. Assessment Diagram ______________________________________________________ B-1

Page 455 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2026-13 adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (the “District” or “LMD No. 1”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and-or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 456 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2026.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2026, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report was filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2026.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 457 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 iii
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 1; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 1 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 1 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 1 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 458 of 695 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 1
Overview
On February 3, 1999, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Beazer).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements are the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, wetlands, horse trails, hardscape masonry, and appurtenant facilities, including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services, described as follows:

Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation, hardscape, masonry wall surfaces, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities in the River Road public right-of-way (parkway area), along the frontage and adjacent to the boundary of the Landscape Maintenance District. A reduced scale plan depicting the improvements is attached hereto. • Landscape maintenance includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements. • Hardscape Masonry includes graffiti removal, repairing cracks, heaving and breakage.

Page 459 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 2
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown below, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purposes as stated herein. A contribution to the District by the City may be made to reduce assessments, as the City Council deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year. The estimated fund deficit for Fiscal Year ending June 30, 2027, is $7,310.57.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications is summarized below.

Page 460 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 3
Table 2-1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Landscape Maintenance $2,850 $2,952
Hardscape Masonry $0 $0
Tree and Plant Replacement $0 $0
Utility - Water $3,500 $3,700
Utility - Electrical $220 $200
Utility - Phone $500 $550
Total Direct Costs $7,070 $7,402
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $4,122 $4,264
Professional Services $1,560 $1,592
City Overhead/Administration $540 $540
County Administration Fees $111 $111
Fuel $30 $30
Incidentals $300 $0
Total Indirect Costs $6,663 $6,537
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $13,733 $13,939
Adjustments
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution ($278) $189
Capital Replacement Collection/Contribution $0 $0
Total Adjustments ($278) $189
Total Assessment (1) $13,455 $14,128
Individual Assessment
Total Parcel 67 67
Maximum Allowable Levy per Parcel $200.82 $210.86
Proposed Levy per Parcel $200.82 $210.86
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve ($6,042) ($7,500)
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution ($278) $189
Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) ($6,321) ($7,311)
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $0.00 $0
Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $0.00 $0
Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $0.00 $0
(1) Slight variance due to rounding. (2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non-expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 461 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 4
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 462 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 5
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements, including but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the District.

The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the District.

Page 463 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 6

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
In 1999 the property owners approved, via ballot, the formation of the District and the levy of the annual assessments, including an annual increase of 5.00%. In no case may the increase exceed the actual cost of providing the services rendered within and pursuant to the District. The application of the 5.00% adjustment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 will increase the maximum per parcel assessment from $200.82 to $210.86. The maximum assessment of $210.86 per parcel will be levied.

Page 464 of 695 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 7
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts are presented in Appendix A.

Page 465 of 695 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 8
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Legal Description of Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Beazer) That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 1 through 12 inclusive, and Lots 14 through 68, inclusive, of Tract No. 28765 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 274, Pages 95 through 98, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

Page 466 of 695 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 467 of 695 ends

Total 67 $14,127.62
APN Levy
121541001 $210.86
121541005 $210.86
121542001 $210.86
121542005 $210.86
121542009 $210.86
121543003 $210.86
121543007 $210.86
121543011 $210.86
121543015 $210.86
121551003 $210.86
121551010 $210.86
121551014 $210.86
121551018 $210.86
121552001 $210.86
121552005 $210.86
121552009 $210.86
121553001 $210.86
APN Levy
121541002 $210.86
121541006 $210.86
121542002 $210.86
121542006 $210.86
121542010 $210.86
121543004 $210.86
121543008 $210.86
121543012 $210.86
121543016 $210.86
121551004 $210.86
121551011 $210.86
121551015 $210.86
121551019 $210.86
121552002 $210.86
121552006 $210.86
121552010 $210.86
121553002 $210.86
APN Levy
121541003 $210.86
121541007 $210.86
121542003 $210.86
121542007 $210.86
121543001 $210.86
121543005 $210.86
121543009 $210.86
121543013 $210.86
121551001 $210.86
121551008 $210.86
121551012 $210.86
121551016 $210.86
121551021 $210.86
121552003 $210.86
121552007 $210.86
121552011 $210.86
121553003 $210.86
APN Levy
121541004 $210.86
121541008 $210.86
121542004 $210.86
121542008 $210.86
121543002 $210.86
121543006 $210.86
121543010 $210.86
121543014 $210.86
121551002 $210.86
121551009 $210.86
121551013 $210.86
121551017 $210.86
121551022 $210.86
121552004 $210.86
121552008 $210.86
121552012 $210.86
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 1 Execution Time: 4/30/2026 12:36:50 PM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682517 - LMD No. 1

Page 468 of 695 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 469 of 695 ends

L
andscapeMaintenanceDistrct1(Beazer)

R VI ER RD
C
ORY
D
O
N
ST

DEL MAR RD

VINE AVE

ELLINGTON DR

EQUESTRIAN
L
N

STEEPLECHASE WAY
S
U
N
D
A
N
C
E
L
N

FAIRVIEW
DR
C
O
R
Y
D
O
N
AV
E
S
U
N
N
Y
HILLS
DR
TRAIL
S
T

PREAKNESS WAY
LEGENDDis
trictBoundary
Landscaping
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LMD1_Beazer.mxd; 06 May 2024 05001,000Fe
et

CITYOFNORCO
Riverside Co. July, 2024
ImprovementLocationMap

Page 470 of 695 ends
Page 471 of 695 ends

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
City of Norco
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Western Pacific – Tract 25779)
Prepared For
May 2026

Page 472 of 695 ends

Table of Contents
Sections
Section i. Engineer’s Statement ________________________________________________i Section 1. Plans and Specifications______________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Cost Estimate______________________________________________________ 3 Section 3. Method of Apportionment ___________________________________________ 5 Section 4. Assessment _______________________________________________________ 8 Section 5. Assessment Diagram ________________________________________________ 9 Tables
Table 2-1. Budget Details _____________________________________________________ 4 Appendices
Appendix A. Assessment Roll __________________________________________________ A-1 Appendix B. Assessment Diagram ______________________________________________ B-1

Page 473 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2026-14 adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (the “District” or “LMD No. 2”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and-or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 474 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2026.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2026, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report was filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2026.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 475 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 iii
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 2; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 2 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 2 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 2 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 476 of 695 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 1
Overview
On October 20, 1999, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Western Pacific).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements are the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, wetlands, horse trails, hardscape masonry, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services, described as follows:

Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation, hardscapes, masonry wall surfaces, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities located within public right-of-way (parkways) and easements (slope) are specifically excluded. Trails and publicly owned parcels park within the boundary of the Assessment District are to be maintained except as specifically excluded.
• Landscape maintenance on Hidden Valley Parkway and Norco Hills Road includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements.
• Slope Maintenance for exterior slopes along Hidden Valley Parkway includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements. Also included is fuel modification along Norco Hills Road.

Equestrian trail maintenance includes minor grading, replacement of wooden posts and rails, and addition of decomposed granite for trail surface. Also includes major storm sandbag contingency.

Wetland maintenance (Lot 71) includes trash and debris cleanup, plant replacement, pest and rodent control.

Page 477 of 695 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 2
Park Maintenance (Lot 2) includes trash and debris cleanup, mowing, fertilization, turf care, pest and rodent control, and observation.

Capital Improvement Projects
Due to the failed Proposition 218 Ballot Measure in 2023 to increase funding in this District, the City removed the old playground equipment in 2024, as it was past its useful lifespan and posed safety risks to residents who use it and was a potential liability for the City.

Starting this year this District is slowly collecting funds for future CIP projects.

Page 478 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 3
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown below, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments.

Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

On November 15, 2023, the City held a Proposition 218 Ballot Measure to increase the maximum annual assessment rate from $835.00 to $969.00. The majority of the ballots received were not in favor of the increase and thus the measure failed.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized on the following page.

Page 479 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 4
Table 2-1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Landscape Maintenance $94,100 $97,356
Wetlands Maintenance $0 $0
Park Maintenance $0 $0
Equestrian Trails $0 $0
Tree and Plant Replacement and Removal $0 $0
Utility - Water $35,000 $35,000
Utility - Electrical $2,000 $2,000
Utility - Phone $0 $0
Total Direct Costs $131,100 $134,356
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $20,534 $21,324
Professional Services $5,202 $5,307
City Overhead/Administration $7,340 $7,340
County Administration Fees $166 $166
Fuel $150 $150
Incidentals $0 $0
Proposition 218 Proceeding $0 $0
Total Indirect Costs $33,392 $34,287
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $164,492 $168,643
Adjustments
General Benefit $0 ($91,864)
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution $31,136 $47,001 Capital Replacement Collection/Contribution $0 $77,890
Total Adjustments $31,136 $33,027
Total Assessment (1) $195,628 $201,671
Individual Assessment
Total Parcels 219 219
Maximum Allowable Levy per Parcel $893.28 $920.87
Proposed Levy per Parcel $893.28 $920.86
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve ($11,789) $20,177
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution $31,136 $47,001 Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) $19,348 $67,178
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $0 $0
Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $0 $77,890
Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $0 $77,890
(1) Slight variance due to rounding. (2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non-expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 480 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 5
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements, which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 481 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 6
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements, including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,”, must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the special benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

Although necessary for the development of these specific properties, some of the improvements also provide a general benefit to the pass-through traffic on the streets where landscape improvements have been installed and

Page 482 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 7
are being maintained. Based upon the most current average daily trip (ADT) information available, the passthrough traffic represents, on average, 89.8% of the total daily traffic on Hidden Valley Parkway and 44.9% of the total daily traffic on Norco Hills Road, between Hidden Valley Parkway and Parkview Drive. These pass-through traffic numbers result in a general benefit contribution of 89.8% of the landscape maintenance costs along Hidden Valley Parkway and 44.9% of the landscape maintenance costs along Norco Hills Road.

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment of the special benefit portion of the improvements.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
The assessments may be increased annually for inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles – Riverside-Orange County Area (CPI), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, this Department shall use a revised index or comparable system for determining fluctuations in the cost of living, as approved by the City Council. The Maximum Assessment is defined as the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by the CPI. If the proposed annual assessment for a given Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

In January 2018, the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, discontinued the Los Angeles - Riverside - Orange County Consumer Price Index and created a new Riverside - San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index. This new index was used to escalate the Maximum Assessment Rate by 3.09% for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The maximum per parcel assessment increased from $893.28 to $920.87. The maximum per parcel assessment of $920.86 will be levied.

Page 483 of 695 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 8
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts are presented in Appendix A.

Page 484 of 695 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 9
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Legal Description of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Beazer) That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 3 through 70 inclusive, and Lots 72 through 221, exclusive of Lot 219, of Tract No. 25779 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 284, Pages 20 through 30, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

Page 485 of 695 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 486 of 695 ends

APN Levy
122570002 $920.86
122570006 $920.86
122570010 $920.86
122581001 $920.86
122581005 $920.86
122591001 $920.86
122591005 $920.86
122592002 $920.86
122592006 $920.86
122600003 $920.86
122600007 $920.86
122600011 $920.86
122611001 $920.86
122612001 $920.86
122612007 $920.86
122612012 $920.86
122613004 $920.86
122613008 $920.86
122620006 $920.86
122620010 $920.86
122620014 $920.86
122620018 $920.86
122632002 $920.86
122633003 $920.86
122633007 $920.86
122640001 $920.86
122640005 $920.86
122640009 $920.86
122640013 $920.86
122640017 $920.86
122640021 $920.86
122640025 $920.86
122651004 $920.86
122652004 $920.86
122653001 $920.86
APN Levy
122570003 $920.86
122570007 $920.86
122570011 $920.86
122581002 $920.86
122582001 $920.86
122591002 $920.86
122591006 $920.86
122592003 $920.86
122592007 $920.86
122600004 $920.86
122600008 $920.86
122600012 $920.86
122611002 $920.86
122612002 $920.86
122612008 $920.86
122613001 $920.86
122613005 $920.86
122620003 $920.86
122620007 $920.86
122620011 $920.86
122620015 $920.86
122631001 $920.86
122632003 $920.86
122633004 $920.86
122633008 $920.86
122640002 $920.86
122640006 $920.86
122640010 $920.86
122640014 $920.86
122640018 $920.86
122640022 $920.86
122651001 $920.86
122652001 $920.86
122652005 $920.86
122653002 $920.86
APN Levy
122570004 $920.86
122570008 $920.86
122570012 $920.86
122581003 $920.86
122582002 $920.86
122591003 $920.86
122591007 $920.86
122592004 $920.86
122600001 $920.86
122600005 $920.86
122600009 $920.86
122600013 $920.86
122611003 $920.86
122612003 $920.86
122612009 $920.86
122613002 $920.86
122613006 $920.86
122620004 $920.86
122620008 $920.86
122620012 $920.86
122620016 $920.86
122631003 $920.86
122632004 $920.86
122633005 $920.86
122633010 $920.86
122640003 $920.86
122640007 $920.86
122640011 $920.86
122640015 $920.86
122640019 $920.86
122640023 $920.86
122651002 $920.86
122652002 $920.86
122652006 $920.86
122653003 $920.86
APN Levy
122570005 $920.86
122570009 $920.86
122570014 $920.86
122581004 $920.86
122582003 $920.86
122591004 $920.86
122592001 $920.86
122592005 $920.86
122600002 $920.86
122600006 $920.86
122600010 $920.86
122600014 $920.86
122611004 $920.86
122612004 $920.86
122612010 $920.86
122613003 $920.86
122613007 $920.86
122620005 $920.86
122620009 $920.86
122620013 $920.86
122620017 $920.86
122632001 $920.86
122632005 $920.86
122633006 $920.86
122633011 $920.86
122640004 $920.86
122640008 $920.86
122640012 $920.86
122640016 $920.86
122640020 $920.86
122640024 $920.86
122651003 $920.86
122652003 $920.86
122652007 $920.86
122653004 $920.86
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 2 Execution Time: 5/4/2026 12:45:48 PM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682518 - LMD No. 2

Page 487 of 695 ends

Total 219 $201,668.34
APN Levy
122653005 $920.86
123390001 $920.86
123390005 $920.86
123390009 $920.86
123390013 $920.86
123390017 $920.86
123400004 $920.86
123400008 $920.86
123411001 $920.86
123411005 $920.86
123411011 $920.86
123411015 $920.86
123411019 $920.86
123411023 $920.86
123412001 $920.86
123420003 $920.86
123420007 $920.86
123420011 $920.86
123431001 $920.86
123431005 $920.86
APN Levy
122653006 $920.86
123390002 $920.86
123390006 $920.86
123390010 $920.86
123390014 $920.86
123400001 $920.86
123400005 $920.86
123400009 $920.86
123411002 $920.86
123411006 $920.86
123411012 $920.86
123411016 $920.86
123411020 $920.86
123411024 $920.86
123412002 $920.86
123420004 $920.86
123420008 $920.86
123420012 $920.86
123431002 $920.86
123431006 $920.86
APN Levy
122653007 $920.86
123390003 $920.86
123390007 $920.86
123390011 $920.86
123390015 $920.86
123400002 $920.86
123400006 $920.86
123400010 $920.86
123411003 $920.86
123411009 $920.86
123411013 $920.86
123411017 $920.86
123411021 $920.86
123411026 $920.86
123420001 $920.86
123420005 $920.86
123420009 $920.86
123420013 $920.86
123431003 $920.86
123431007 $920.86
APN Levy
122653008 $920.86
123390004 $920.86
123390008 $920.86
123390012 $920.86
123390016 $920.86
123400003 $920.86
123400007 $920.86
123400011 $920.86
123411004 $920.86
123411010 $920.86
123411014 $920.86
123411018 $920.86
123411022 $920.86
123411027 $920.86
123420002 $920.86
123420006 $920.86
123420010 $920.86
123420014 $920.86
123431004 $920.86
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 2 of 2 Execution Time: 5/4/2026 12:45:48 PM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682518 - LMD No. 2

Page 488 of 695 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 489 of 695 ends

Landscape Maintenance Distrct 2 (Western Pacific)

PARKRIDGE AVE

TALLYHO LN
NORCO
HILLS
RD

AZTEC LN
CORONA
AVE

EAGLESNEST DR

EL PASO DR

ROCK SPRINGS AVE

HARNESS
LN

GOLDENEAGLE

DR VIA BLAIRO
HIDDEN
VALLEY
PKW Y
PASEO

AZUL WAY

MIRASOL LN

ESPERANZA DR

FALCONCREST ST

FLAMINGO D R

MONTEZUMA
DR

PALO CEDRO
DR
VILLA
M

ONTES CIR

ALLEGRE CIR

THOROUGHBRED
LN

REDTAIL
DR

MADERA CIR

CASANDRA LN
HERON
DR

DRY GULCH PL

SILVER SPUR WAY

HILLSIDE AVE
MIRA
VALLE
ST

ELGIN WAY
RAQUEL
RD
SEDONA
LN

TEMESCAL AVE

FIRST ST BODIE PL

MAGIA CIR

GUNSMOKE
RD

VILLAGE LOOP DR

TEMESCAL ST

TEMESCAL CIR

ABILE NE PL
DO

GWOOD W AY
CANYON
VIEW
PL

PALERMO
LN

LA MARILLO C RI

STIRRUP
WAY

CIMARRON LN

IM P RESIVIO
DR

CORSICA
DR
AQUINO
C RI

PARKVIEW DR

TUCSON AVE
BIG

PINE LN NOT A
PART
LEGEND
District Boundary
Landscaping
Park
Wetland
Equestrian Trails
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LM
D2_West_Pac.mxd; 08 May 2024 0 500 1,000
Feet

CITY OF NORCO
Riverside Co. July, 2024
Improvement Location Map

Page 490 of 695 ends
Page 491 of 695 ends

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
City of Norco
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
(Centex – Tract 28626)
Prepared For
May 2026

Page 492 of 695 ends

Table of Contents
Sections
Section i. Engineer’s Statement ________________________________________________i Section 1. Plans and Specifications______________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Cost Estimate______________________________________________________ 3 Section 3. Method of Apportionment ___________________________________________ 5 Section 4. Assessment _______________________________________________________ 8 Section 5. Assessment Diagram ________________________________________________ 9 Tables
Table 2-1. Budget Details _____________________________________________________ 4 Appendices
Appendix A. Assessment Roll __________________________________________________ A-1 Appendix B. Assessment Diagram ______________________________________________ B-1

Page 493 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2026-15 adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (the “District” or “LMD No. 3”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and-or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 494 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2026.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2026, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report was filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2026.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 495 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 iii
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 3; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 3 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 3 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 3 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 496 of 695 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 1
Overview
On October 20, 1999, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Western Pacific).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements are the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, wetlands, horse trails, hardscaping, and masonry, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contracting services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services, described as follows:

Landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation, hardscapes, masonry wall surfaces, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities located within public right-of-way (parkways) and easements (slope) are specifically excluded. Trails and publicly owned parcels park within the boundary of the Assessment District are to be maintained except as specifically excluded.
• Landscape maintenance on Hidden Valley Parkway and Norco Hills Road includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements.
• Slope Maintenance for exterior slopes along Hidden Valley Parkway includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacements. Also included is fuel modification along Norco Hills Road.

Equestrian trail maintenance includes minor grading, replacement of wooden posts and rails, and addition of decomposed granite for trail surface. Also includes major storm sandbag contingency.

Wetland maintenance (Lot 71) includes trash and debris cleanup, plant replacement, pest and rodent control.

Page 497 of 695 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 2
Park Maintenance (Lot 2) includes trash and debris cleanup, mowing, fertilization, turf care, pest and rodent control, and observation.

Capital Improvement Projects
Equestrian Trail Fence Replacement: The City is collecting funds to replace the equestrian trail fencing from wood to vinyl over a 25 year period.

Page 498 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 3
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown in Table 2-1, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments.

Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

On November 15, 2023, the City held a Proposition 218 Ballot Measure to increase the maximum annual assessment rate from $1,251.63 to $1,489.00. The majority of the ballots received were not in favor of the increase and thus the measure failed.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized in Table 2-1.

Page 499 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 4
Table 2-1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Landscape Maintenance $40,100 $41,458
Wetlands Maintenance $0 $0
Park Maintenance $0 $0
Equestrian Trails $0 $0
Tree and Plant Replacement and Removal $0 $0
Utility - Water $35,000 $35,000
Utility - Electrical $1,000 $1,000
Utility - Phone $65 $65
Total Direct Costs $76,165 $77,523
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $16,432 $17,060
Professional Services $4,200 $4,245
City Overhead/Administration $5,100 $5,100
County Administration Fees $117 $117
Fuel $100 $100
Incidentals $1,000 $0
Proposition 218 Proceeding $0 $0
Total Indirect Costs $26,949 $26,622
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $103,114 $104,145
Adjustments
General Benefit $0 ($32,270)
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution $6,594 $20,980 Capital Replacement Collection/Contribution $0 $20,244
Total Adjustments $6,594 $8,955
Total Assessment (1) $109,708 $113,099
Individual Assessment
Total Parcels 82 82
Maximum Allowable Levy per Parcel $1,337.91 $1,379.24
Proposed Levy per Parcel $1,337.90 $1,379.24
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve $7,643 $17,781
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution $6,594 $20,980 Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) $14,237 $38,762
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $0 $0
Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $0 $20,244
Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $0 $20,244
(1) Slight variance due to rounding. (2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non-expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 500 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 5
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements, which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 501 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 6
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the special benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

Although necessary for the development of these specific properties, some of the improvements also provide a general benefit to the pass-through traffic on the streets where landscape improvements have been installed and

Page 502 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 7
are being maintained. Based upon the most current average daily trip (ADT) information available, the passthrough traffic represents, on average, 89.7% of the total daily traffic on Norco Hills Road, between Parkview Drive and Valley Drive. These pass-through traffic numbers result in a general benefit contribution of 89.7% of the landscape maintenance costs along Norco Hills Road.

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment of the special benefit portion of the improvements.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
The assessments may be increased annually for inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles – Riverside-Orange County Area (CPI), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, this Department shall use a revised index or comparable system for determining fluctuations in the cost of living, as approved by the City Council. The Maximum Assessment is defined as the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by the CPI. If the proposed annual assessment for a given Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

In January 2018, the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, discontinued the Los Angeles - Riverside - Orange County Consumer Price Index and created a new Riverside - San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index. This new index was used to escalate the Maximum Assessment Rate by 3.09% for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The maximum per parcel assessment increased from $1,337.91 to $1,379.24. The maximum per parcel assessment of $1,379.24 will be levied.

Page 503 of 695 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 8
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts are presented in Appendix A.

Page 504 of 695 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 3
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 9
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Legal Description of Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 (Beazer) That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 3 through 70 inclusive, and Lots 72 through 221, exclusive of Lot 219, of Tract No. 25779 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 284, Pages 20 through 30, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

Page 505 of 695 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 506 of 695 ends

Total 82 $113,097.68
APN Levy
123450001 $1,379.24
123450005 $1,379.24
123461003 $1,379.24
123461007 $1,379.24
123462003 $1,379.24
123462007 $1,379.24
123462011 $1,379.24
123462015 $1,379.24
123462019 $1,379.24
123471002 $1,379.24
123472001 $1,379.24
123472005 $1,379.24
123472009 $1,379.24
123472013 $1,379.24
123481001 $1,379.24
123481005 $1,379.24
123482003 $1,379.24
123482007 $1,379.24
123482011 $1,379.24
123482015 $1,379.24
123482019 $1,379.24
APN Levy
123450002 $1,379.24
123450014 $1,379.24
123461004 $1,379.24
123461008 $1,379.24
123462004 $1,379.24
123462008 $1,379.24
123462012 $1,379.24
123462016 $1,379.24
123462020 $1,379.24
123471003 $1,379.24
123472002 $1,379.24
123472006 $1,379.24
123472010 $1,379.24
123473001 $1,379.24
123481002 $1,379.24
123481006 $1,379.24
123482004 $1,379.24
123482008 $1,379.24
123482012 $1,379.24
123482016 $1,379.24
123482020 $1,379.24
APN Levy
123450003 $1,379.24
123461001 $1,379.24
123461005 $1,379.24
123462001 $1,379.24
123462005 $1,379.24
123462009 $1,379.24
123462013 $1,379.24
123462017 $1,379.24
123462021 $1,379.24
123471004 $1,379.24
123472003 $1,379.24
123472007 $1,379.24
123472011 $1,379.24
123473002 $1,379.24
123481003 $1,379.24
123482001 $1,379.24
123482005 $1,379.24
123482009 $1,379.24
123482013 $1,379.24
123482017 $1,379.24
APN Levy
123450004 $1,379.24
123461002 $1,379.24
123461006 $1,379.24
123462002 $1,379.24
123462006 $1,379.24
123462010 $1,379.24
123462014 $1,379.24
123462018 $1,379.24
123471001 $1,379.24
123471005 $1,379.24
123472004 $1,379.24
123472008 $1,379.24
123472012 $1,379.24
123473003 $1,379.24
123481004 $1,379.24
123482002 $1,379.24
123482006 $1,379.24
123482010 $1,379.24
123482014 $1,379.24
123482018 $1,379.24
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 1 Execution Time: 5/4/2026 12:50:41 PM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682519 - LMD No. 3

Page 507 of 695 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 508 of 695 ends

Landscape Maintenance Distrct 3 (Centex)
NORCO
HILLS
RD

FENNEL DR
VALLEY
DR
D
O
D
GE WAY
CELERY
LN
DILL
CIR
CALICO
C
T

FRIESIAN ST

CORIANDER
CIR
S
AFFR
O
N
C
RI
RED
ROCK
WAY

PARSLEY
LN

SHETLAND
CIR

ROSEMARY
CIR
LONGHO
RN W
AY
CLY
DES
D
ALE CT
CARSON
LN
SILVER

SPRINGS LN
PA
RKVIE
W
D
R
LEGEND
District Boundary
Landscaping
Equiestrian Trails
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LM
D3_Centex.mxd; 29 Apr 2024 0 500 1,000
Feet

CITY OF NORCO
Riverside Co. July, 2024
Improvement Location Map

Page 509 of 695 ends
Page 510 of 695 ends

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
City of Norco
Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
(Norco Ridge Ranch – Tracts 29588 & 29589)
Prepared For
May 2026

Page 511 of 695 ends

Table of Contents
Sections
Section i. Engineer’s Statement ________________________________________________i Section 1. Plans and Specifications______________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Cost Estimate______________________________________________________ 3 Section 3. Method of Apportionment ___________________________________________ 5 Section 4. Assessment _______________________________________________________ 8 Section 5. Assessment Diagram ________________________________________________ 9 Tables
Table 2-1. Budget Details _____________________________________________________ 4 Appendices
Appendix A. Assessment Roll __________________________________________________ A-1 Appendix B. Assessment Diagram ______________________________________________ B-1

Page 512 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2026-16 adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (the “District” or “LMD No. 4”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and-or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 513 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2026.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2026, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report was filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2026.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 514 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 iii
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 4; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 4 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 4 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 4 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 515 of 695 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 1
Overview
On August 7, 2002, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 4 (Norco Ridge Ranch – Tracts 29588 & 29589).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the Riverside County Assessor’s Office. The County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
Improvements include but are not limited to landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of-way, parkways, slopes, trails, open space and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. The following are the facilities to be maintained within the District:

Slopes, Parkways and Trails:
• Slope landscaping – non-irrigated (3.78 acres)
• Slope landscaping – irrigated (13.17 acres)
• Fuel modification areas (17.66 acres)
• Parkway landscaping (1.11 acres)
• Equestrian trails (26.54 acres)
Open Space and Wetland Areas:
• Natural open space – non-irrigated (384.34 acres)
• Wetlands area – non-irrigated (13.04 acres)
Capital Improvement Projects
All of the equestrian trail wood fencing has been replaced with vinyl fencing for a total cost to the District of $919,432. This amount was collected over time in the Capital Replacement Reserve Fund.

Page 516 of 695 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 2
Crestview Slope - The existing Acacia redolens plant material is over 25 years old and has entered a stage of significant decline and has exceeded its typical life expectancy. As a result, routine maintenance has become increasingly challenging, particularly with respect to trimming due to plant size and height. Additionally, irrigation system maintenance and repairs have grown more difficult and less efficient.

The City has initiated planning efforts to address these issues through a phased rehabilitation approach. RHA Landscape Architects has been engaged to assist in developing feasible solutions.

Initial cost estimates for a full-scale slope renovation—including complete vegetation removal, new irrigation installation, and replanting with a new variety of Acacia —are approximately $7 million. Due to the high cost, this option is not financially viable.

As an alternative, a more cost-effective phased approach has been proposed. This plan includes clearing the slope in manageable sections, repairing existing irrigation infrastructure as needed, and establishing new vegetation through hydroseeding with a California native plant mix. This strategy reduces the projected cost by approximately $6 million and allows implementation over time, minimizing the financial impact on the district while improving long-term sustainability and maintenance efficiency. The district will be collecting Capital Replacement Reserves over time to fund this project.

Page 517 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 3
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown in Table 2-1, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments.

Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized in Table 2-1.

Page 518 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 4
Table 2-1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2025-26 FY 2026-27
Landscape Maintenance $330,000 $337,405
Wetlands Maintenance $0 $0
Park Maintenance $0 $0
Equestrian Trails $0 $0
Natural Open Space $0 $0
Tree and Plant Replacement and Removal $2,000 $1,000
Utility - Water $90,000 $100,000
Utility - Electrical $8,000 $8,000
Utility - Phone $500 $550
Total Direct Costs $430,500 $446,955
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $28,740 $29,854
Professional Services $6,200 $16,750
City Overhead/Administration $31,500 $31,500
County Administration Fees $288 $288
Fuel $160 $160
Incidentals $5,000 $5,000
Proposition 218 Proceeding $0 $0
Total Indirect Costs $71,888 $83,552
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $502,388 $530,507
Adjustments
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution $0 $0
Capital Replacement Collection/Contribution $5,000 $75,000 Total Adjustments $5,000 $75,000
Total Assessment (1) $507,388 $605,507
Individual Assessment
Total EBUs 537.50 537.50
Maximum Allowable Levy per EBU $1,422.39 $1,466.33
Proposed Levy per EBU $943.98 $1,126.54
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve $217,750 $223,478
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution $0 $0.0
Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) $217,750 $223,478
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $141,088 $105,920 Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $5,000 $75,000
Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $146,088 $180,920 (1) Slight variance due to rounding.
(2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non-expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 519 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 5
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements, which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 520 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 6
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.

The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

Page 521 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 7

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District.

EQUIVALENT BENEFIT UNITS:

To proportionally and equitably assess the special benefits to each parcel, it is necessary to correlate each property’s proportional benefit to other properties that benefit from the improvements and services being funded. The Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) method of apportionment uses a basic unit (base value) of assessment that is common to all properties benefiting from the improvements and services provided and assigns a weighted value to each parcel based on an assessment formula that equates the property’s specific development status, type of development (land use), and size of the property, as compared to the base value.

Single Family Residential — This land use is defined as a fully subdivided residential home site with or without a structure. This land use is assigned 1.0 EBU per lot or parcel.

Each parcel within Tract Nos. 29588, -2, -3, -4, -5 and Tract Nos. 29589-1, -2, -3 benefit equally from the improvements and have been assigned 1.0 EBU. The parcels within Tract No. 29588-1 receive only the benefit of the trail maintenance and therefore have been assigned 0.22 EBUs.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
The assessments may be increased annually for inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles – Riverside-Orange County Area (CPI), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, this Department shall use a revised index or comparable system for determining fluctuations in the cost of living, as approved by the City Council. The Maximum Assessment is defined as the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by the CPI. If the proposed annual assessment for a given Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

In January 2018, the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, discontinued the Los Angeles - Riverside - Orange County Consumer Price Index and created a new Riverside - San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index. This new index was used to escalate the Maximum Assessment Rate by 3.09% for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The maximum assessment per EBU increased from $1, 422.39 to $1,466.33.

Page 522 of 695 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 8
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts are presented in Appendix A.

Page 523 of 695 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 4
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 9
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Page 524 of 695 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 525 of 695 ends

APN Levy
123450015 $1,126.54
123450019 $1,126.54
123450023 $1,126.54
123500006 $1,126.54
123500010 $1,126.54
123500015 $1,126.54
123510001 $1,126.54
123510005 $1,126.54
123510009 $1,126.54
123511003 $1,126.54
123511007 $1,126.54
123520002 $1,126.54
123520006 $1,126.54
123520010 $1,126.54
123520014 $1,126.54
123540003 $1,126.54
123540007 $1,126.54
123540011 $1,126.54
123540015 $1,126.54
123540020 $1,126.54
123550001 $1,126.54
123550007 $1,126.54
123550011 $1,126.54
123551001 $1,126.54
123551005 $1,126.54
123560004 $1,126.54
123560008 $1,126.54
123560012 $1,126.54
123561004 $1,126.54
123570001 $1,126.54
123570005 $1,126.54
123570009 $1,126.54
123570013 $1,126.54
123570017 $1,126.54
123580009 $1,126.54
APN Levy
123450016 $1,126.54
123450020 $1,126.54
123450026 $1,126.54
123500007 $1,126.54
123500011 $1,126.54
123500016 $1,126.54
123510002 $1,126.54
123510006 $1,126.54
123510010 $1,126.54
123511004 $1,126.54
123511008 $1,126.54
123520003 $1,126.54
123520007 $1,126.54
123520011 $1,126.54
123521001 $1,126.54
123540004 $1,126.54
123540008 $1,126.54
123540012 $1,126.54
123540016 $1,126.54
123540021 $1,126.54
123550002 $1,126.54
123550008 $1,126.54
123550012 $1,126.54
123551002 $1,126.54
123560001 $1,126.54
123560005 $1,126.54
123560009 $1,126.54
123561001 $1,126.54
123561005 $1,126.54
123570002 $1,126.54
123570006 $1,126.54
123570010 $1,126.54
123570014 $1,126.54
123580001 $1,126.54
123580018 $1,126.54
APN Levy
123450017 $1,126.54
123450021 $1,126.54
123450027 $1,126.54
123500008 $1,126.54
123500012 $1,126.54
123500017 $1,126.54
123510003 $1,126.54
123510007 $1,126.54
123511001 $1,126.54
123511005 $1,126.54
123511009 $1,126.54
123520004 $1,126.54
123520008 $1,126.54
123520012 $1,126.54
123540001 $1,126.54
123540005 $1,126.54
123540009 $1,126.54
123540013 $1,126.54
123540017 $1,126.54
123540022 $1,126.54
123550003 $1,126.54
123550009 $1,126.54
123550019 $1,126.54
123551003 $1,126.54
123560002 $1,126.54
123560006 $1,126.54
123560010 $1,126.54
123561002 $1,126.54
123561006 $1,126.54
123570003 $1,126.54
123570007 $1,126.54
123570011 $1,126.54
123570015 $1,126.54
123580002 $1,126.54
123590001 $1,126.54
APN Levy
123450018 $1,126.54
123450022 $1,126.54
123450028 $1,126.54
123500009 $1,126.54
123500014 $1,126.54
123500018 $1,126.54
123510004 $1,126.54
123510008 $1,126.54
123511002 $1,126.54
123511006 $1,126.54
123520001 $1,126.54
123520005 $1,126.54
123520009 $1,126.54
123520013 $1,126.54
123540002 $1,126.54
123540006 $1,126.54
123540010 $1,126.54
123540014 $1,126.54
123540018 $1,126.54
123540030 $1,126.54
123550006 $1,126.54
123550010 $1,126.54
123550020 $1,126.54
123551004 $1,126.54
123560003 $1,126.54
123560007 $1,126.54
123560011 $1,126.54
123561003 $1,126.54
123561007 $1,126.54
123570004 $1,126.54
123570008 $1,126.54
123570012 $1,126.54
123570016 $1,126.54
123580003 $1,126.54
123590002 $1,126.54
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 5 Execution Time: 5/12/2026 7:36:32 AM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 526 of 695 ends

APN Levy
123590003 $1,126.54
123590007 $1,126.54
123590011 $1,126.54
123590015 $1,126.54
123591004 $1,126.54
123591008 $1,126.54
123600001 $1,126.54
123600005 $1,126.54
123600009 $1,126.54
123600013 $1,126.54
123600020 $1,126.54
123602001 $1,126.54
123602005 $1,126.54
123602009 $1,126.54
123610002 $1,126.54
123612001 $1,126.54
123612005 $1,126.54
123612009 $1,126.54
123613001 $1,126.54
123613005 $1,126.54
123620001 $1,126.54
123620005 $1,126.54
123621002 $1,126.54
123621006 $1,126.54
123621010 $1,126.54
123621014 $1,126.54
123630001 $1,126.54
123630005 $1,126.54
123630009 $1,126.54
123630013 $1,126.54
123630017 $1,126.54
123630021 $1,126.54
123640002 $1,126.54
123640010 $1,126.54
123640014 $1,126.54
APN Levy
123590004 $1,126.54
123590008 $1,126.54
123590012 $1,126.54
123591001 $1,126.54
123591005 $1,126.54
123592001 $1,126.54
123600002 $1,126.54
123600006 $1,126.54
123600010 $1,126.54
123600017 $1,126.54
123600021 $1,126.54
123602002 $1,126.54
123602006 $1,126.54
123602010 $1,126.54
123611001 $1,126.54
123612002 $1,126.54
123612006 $1,126.54
123612010 $1,126.54
123613002 $1,126.54
123613006 $1,126.54
123620002 $1,126.54
123620006 $1,126.54
123621003 $1,126.54
123621007 $1,126.54
123621011 $1,126.54
123621015 $1,126.54
123630002 $1,126.54
123630006 $1,126.54
123630010 $1,126.54
123630014 $1,126.54
123630018 $1,126.54
123630022 $1,126.54
123640003 $1,126.54
123640011 $1,126.54
123640015 $1,126.54
APN Levy
123590005 $1,126.54
123590009 $1,126.54
123590013 $1,126.54
123591002 $1,126.54
123591006 $1,126.54
123592002 $1,126.54
123600003 $1,126.54
123600007 $1,126.54
123600011 $1,126.54
123600018 $1,126.54
123600022 $1,126.54
123602003 $1,126.54
123602007 $1,126.54
123602011 $1,126.54
123611002 $1,126.54
123612003 $1,126.54
123612007 $1,126.54
123612011 $1,126.54
123613003 $1,126.54
123613007 $1,126.54
123620003 $1,126.54
123620007 $1,126.54
123621004 $1,126.54
123621008 $1,126.54
123621012 $1,126.54
123621016 $1,126.54
123630003 $1,126.54
123630007 $1,126.54
123630011 $1,126.54
123630015 $1,126.54
123630019 $1,126.54
123630023 $1,126.54
123640004 $1,126.54
123640012 $1,126.54
123640016 $1,126.54
APN Levy
123590006 $1,126.54
123590010 $1,126.54
123590014 $1,126.54
123591003 $1,126.54
123591007 $1,126.54
123592003 $1,126.54
123600004 $1,126.54
123600008 $1,126.54
123600012 $1,126.54
123600019 $1,126.54
123600023 $1,126.54
123602004 $1,126.54
123602008 $1,126.54
123610001 $1,126.54
123611003 $1,126.54
123612004 $1,126.54
123612008 $1,126.54
123612012 $1,126.54
123613004 $1,126.54
123613008 $1,126.54
123620004 $1,126.54
123621001 $1,126.54
123621005 $1,126.54
123621009 $1,126.54
123621013 $1,126.54
123621017 $1,126.54
123630004 $1,126.54
123630008 $1,126.54
123630012 $1,126.54
123630016 $1,126.54
123630020 $1,126.54
123640001 $1,126.54
123640005 $1,126.54
123640013 $1,126.54
123640017 $1,126.54
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 2 of 5 Execution Time: 5/12/2026 7:36:32 AM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 527 of 695 ends

APN Levy
123640018 $1,126.54
123650001 $1,126.54
123650005 $1,126.54
123650009 $1,126.54
123650013 $1,126.54
123651003 $1,126.54
123660004 $1,126.54
123660008 $1,126.54
123660012 $1,126.54
123661002 $1,126.54
123661006 $1,126.54
123661010 $1,126.54
123670003 $1,126.54
123670007 $1,126.54
123671002 $1,126.54
123671006 $1,126.54
123671010 $1,126.54
123671014 $1,126.54
168260002 $1,126.54
168260006 $1,126.54
168260010 $1,126.54
168260014 $1,126.54
168260018 $1,126.54
168260022 $1,126.54
168270004 $1,126.54
168270008 $1,126.54
168270012 $1,126.54
168270016 $1,126.54
168271004 $1,126.54
168280003 $1,126.54
168281001 $1,126.54
168281005 $1,126.54
168282001 $1,126.54
168290001 $1,126.54
168290005 $1,126.54
APN Levy
123640019 $1,126.54
123650002 $1,126.54
123650006 $1,126.54
123650010 $1,126.54
123650014 $1,126.54
123660001 $1,126.54
123660005 $1,126.54
123660009 $1,126.54
123660013 $1,126.54
123661003 $1,126.54
123661007 $1,126.54
123661011 $1,126.54
123670004 $1,126.54
123670008 $1,126.54
123671003 $1,126.54
123671007 $1,126.54
123671011 $1,126.54
123671015 $1,126.54
168260003 $1,126.54
168260007 $1,126.54
168260011 $1,126.54
168260015 $1,126.54
168260019 $1,126.54
168270001 $1,126.54
168270005 $1,126.54
168270009 $1,126.54
168270013 $1,126.54
168271001 $1,126.54
168271005 $1,126.54
168280004 $1,126.54
168281002 $1,126.54
168281006 $1,126.54
168282002 $1,126.54
168290002 $1,126.54
168290006 $1,126.54
APN Levy
123640020 $1,126.54
123650003 $1,126.54
123650007 $1,126.54
123650011 $1,126.54
123651001 $1,126.54
123660002 $1,126.54
123660006 $1,126.54
123660010 $1,126.54
123660014 $1,126.54
123661004 $1,126.54
123661008 $1,126.54
123670001 $1,126.54
123670005 $1,126.54
123670009 $1,126.54
123671004 $1,126.54
123671008 $1,126.54
123671012 $1,126.54
123671016 $1,126.54
168260004 $1,126.54
168260008 $1,126.54
168260012 $1,126.54
168260016 $1,126.54
168260020 $1,126.54
168270002 $1,126.54
168270006 $1,126.54
168270010 $1,126.54
168270014 $1,126.54
168271002 $1,126.54
168280001 $1,126.54
168280005 $1,126.54
168281003 $1,126.54
168281007 $1,126.54
168282003 $1,126.54
168290003 $1,126.54
168290007 $1,126.54
APN Levy
123640021 $1,126.54
123650004 $1,126.54
123650008 $1,126.54
123650012 $1,126.54
123651002 $1,126.54
123660003 $1,126.54
123660007 $1,126.54
123660011 $1,126.54
123661001 $1,126.54
123661005 $1,126.54
123661009 $1,126.54
123670002 $1,126.54
123670006 $1,126.54
123671001 $1,126.54
123671005 $1,126.54
123671009 $1,126.54
123671013 $1,126.54
168260001 $1,126.54
168260005 $1,126.54
168260009 $1,126.54
168260013 $1,126.54
168260017 $1,126.54
168260021 $1,126.54
168270003 $1,126.54
168270007 $1,126.54
168270011 $1,126.54
168270015 $1,126.54
168271003 $1,126.54
168280002 $1,126.54
168280006 $1,126.54
168281004 $1,126.54
168281008 $1,126.54
168282004 $1,126.54
168290004 $1,126.54
168290008 $1,126.54
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 3 of 5 Execution Time: 5/12/2026 7:36:32 AM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 528 of 695 ends

APN Levy
168290009 $1,126.54
168291002 $1,126.54
168291006 $1,126.54
168292004 $1,126.54
168300001 $1,126.54
168300005 $1,126.54
168300009 $1,126.54
168300013 $1,126.54
168300017 $1,126.54
168300021 $1,126.54
168300025 $1,126.54
168300029 $1,126.54
168300033 $1,126.54
168300037 $1,126.54
168311001 $1,126.54
168311005 $1,126.54
168311009 $1,126.54
168311013 $1,126.54
168311017 $1,126.54
168312003 $1,126.54
168312007 $1,126.54
168320003 $1,126.54
168320007 $1,126.54
168320011 $1,126.54
168320015 $1,126.54
168321002 $1,126.54
168321006 $1,126.54
168321010 $1,126.54
168350001 $247.42
168350005 $247.42
168350009 $247.42
168350013 $247.42
168350017 $247.42
168350021 $247.42
168350025 $247.42
APN Levy
168290010 $1,126.54
168291003 $1,126.54
168292001 $1,126.54
168292005 $1,126.54
168300002 $1,126.54
168300006 $1,126.54
168300010 $1,126.54
168300014 $1,126.54
168300018 $1,126.54
168300022 $1,126.54
168300026 $1,126.54
168300030 $1,126.54
168300034 $1,126.54
168300038 $1,126.54
168311002 $1,126.54
168311006 $1,126.54
168311010 $1,126.54
168311014 $1,126.54
168311018 $1,126.54
168312004 $1,126.54
168312008 $1,126.54
168320004 $1,126.54
168320008 $1,126.54
168320012 $1,126.54
168320016 $1,126.54
168321003 $1,126.54
168321007 $1,126.54
168321011 $1,126.54
168350002 $247.42
168350006 $247.42
168350010 $247.42
168350014 $247.42
168350018 $247.42
168350022 $247.42
APN Levy
168290011 $1,126.54
168291004 $1,126.54
168292002 $1,126.54
168292006 $1,126.54
168300003 $1,126.54
168300007 $1,126.54
168300011 $1,126.54
168300015 $1,126.54
168300019 $1,126.54
168300023 $1,126.54
168300027 $1,126.54
168300031 $1,126.54
168300035 $1,126.54
168300039 $1,126.54
168311003 $1,126.54
168311007 $1,126.54
168311011 $1,126.54
168311015 $1,126.54
168312001 $1,126.54
168312005 $1,126.54
168320001 $1,126.54
168320005 $1,126.54
168320009 $1,126.54
168320013 $1,126.54
168320017 $1,126.54
168321004 $1,126.54
168321008 $1,126.54
168321012 $1,126.54
168350003 $247.42
168350007 $247.42
168350011 $247.42
168350015 $247.42
168350019 $247.42
168350023 $247.42
APN Levy
168291001 $1,126.54
168291005 $1,126.54
168292003 $1,126.54
168292007 $1,126.54
168300004 $1,126.54
168300008 $1,126.54
168300012 $1,126.54
168300016 $1,126.54
168300020 $1,126.54
168300024 $1,126.54
168300028 $1,126.54
168300032 $1,126.54
168300036 $1,126.54
168310001 $1,126.54
168311004 $1,126.54
168311008 $1,126.54
168311012 $1,126.54
168311016 $1,126.54
168312002 $1,126.54
168312006 $1,126.54
168320002 $1,126.54
168320006 $1,126.54
168320010 $1,126.54
168320014 $1,126.54
168321001 $1,126.54
168321005 $1,126.54
168321009 $1,126.54
168321013 $1,126.54
168350004 $247.42
168350008 $247.42
168350012 $247.42
168350016 $247.42
168350020 $247.42
168350024 $247.42
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 4 of 5 Execution Time: 5/12/2026 7:36:32 AM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 529 of 695 ends

Total 557 $605,504.78
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 5 of 5 Execution Time: 5/12/2026 7:36:32 AM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682520 - LMD No. 4

Page 530 of 695 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 531 of 695 ends

Landscape Maintenance Distrct 4 (Ridge Ranch)
6TH ST

FIFTH ST

TEMESCAL AVE

NORCO HILLS
RD
3RD ST

CRESTVIEW

DR FRIESIA N
ST

VALLEY DR

EL PASO

DR CALIFORNIA AVE

GRAMERCY
PL

HA RNESS
LN
AZTEC
LN

WENTWORTH
DR

W YCLIFF E
ST
DEWAR
DR

ROSEMARY
CIR

PARKVIEW DR

FOURTH ST

PEACOCK
LN

G NI GER LN

HILLSIDE AVE
SIERRA
VISTA
AVE

DAPPLEGRAY LN

WILD HORSE
LN

OL D ENBUR G LN

TILDEN PL

MT SHASTA DR
CROSS
RAIL
LN

CORIANDER
CIR

MT RUSH MORE
DR

CREIGHTON ST

A NDALUSIAN
DR

GA R DEN GROVE AVE
STABLE
WAY

CARSON LN

BRANDING IRON WAY

COLLEGE
AVE

RALEY DR

KINGMAN DR

EAST ST

BUCKSKIN LN

LA QUINTA WAY

VAND ERMOLEN DR

CENTER AVE

PEDLEY AVE
LEGEND
District Boundary
Landscaping
Park
Wetlands
Open Space
Equestrian Trails
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LM
D4_Ridge_Ranch_Portrait.mxd; Map Date 09 May 2024 0 2,000 4,000 Feet
Riverside Co. GIS, July 2024
Improvement Location Map

Page 532 of 695 ends
Page 533 of 695 ends

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
City of Norco
Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
(Hawk’s Crest)
Prepared For
May 2026

Page 534 of 695 ends

Table of Contents
Sections
Section i. Engineer’s Statement ________________________________________________i Section 1. Plans and Specifications______________________________________________ 1 Section 2. Cost Estimate______________________________________________________ 3 Section 3. Method of Apportionment ___________________________________________ 5 Section 4. Assessment _______________________________________________________ 8 Section 5. Assessment Diagram ________________________________________________ 9 Tables
Table 2-1. Budget Details _____________________________________________________ 4 Appendices
Appendix A. Assessment Roll __________________________________________________ A-1 Appendix B. Assessment Diagram ______________________________________________ B-1

Page 535 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 i
AGENCY: CITY OF NORCO
PROJECT: LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5
TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Norco (the “City”), State of California, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (the "Report"), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (the “1972 Act”), as amended, commencing with Section 22500, and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2026-17 adopted by the City Council, Riverside County, California ordering the preparation of the Report for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (the “District” or “LMD No. 5”). This Report is applicable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2026, to June 30, 2027.

SECTION 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing improvements and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements.

SECTION 2 A COST ESTIMATE of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year.

SECTION 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the exterior boundaries as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 4 An ASSESSMENT showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel within the boundaries of the District, as shown in Appendix B.

SECTION 5 An ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM of the District. Said Diagrams shall show the boundaries of the District.

Reference is made to the Riverside County (the “County”) Assessor's Maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lots or parcels. The lines and dimensions of each lot shall conform to those shown on the County Assessor's Maps for the Fiscal Year to which the Report applies.

Page 536 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 ii
I, Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the City of Norco, pursuant to the Act do hereby assess and apportion the total amount of the costs and expenses upon the parcels of land within Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 liable therefore and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from said maintenance, works of improvement, and appurtenances.

Executed this day of 2026.

ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES
MATTHEW E. WEBB
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385

ENGINEER OF WORK

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2026, by adoption of Resolution No. by City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
A copy of the Assessment Roll and Engineer's Report was filed in the City Clerk’s Office on the day of 2026.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF NORCO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Page 537 of 695 ends

i. Engineer’s Statement
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 iii
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2026, the City Council, under the Act, adopted its Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy and Collection of Assessments and the Preparation of an Engineer’s Report for LMD No. 5; Whereas, the Resolution of Intention directed Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file a report presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements for LMD No. 5 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for LMD No. 5 showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within LMD No. 5 in proportion to the special benefit received;

Page 538 of 695 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 1
Overview
On November 5, 2003, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 (commencing with Section 22500) of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code (the “Act”) adopted its Resolution of the City Council of the City of Norco Initiating Proceedings for the Formation for a Maintenance Assessment District and thereafter formed Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Hawk’s Crest).

This Report describes the District, the improvements, and the proposed assessments to be levied against properties in connection with the benefits the properties will receive from the maintenance and servicing of the District improvements for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The annual assessments to be levied on properties within the District provide a funding source for the continued operation and maintenance of local landscaping improvements installed in connection with the development of properties within the District. Each fiscal year, the City establishes the District’s assessments based on an estimate of the costs to maintain, operate and service the landscaping improvements and based upon available revenues including fund balances and assessment limits. The costs of the improvements and the proposed annual assessments budgeted and assessed against properties within the District may include: the estimated expenditures for regular annual maintenance and repairs; incidental expenditures related to the operation and administration of the District and the collection of adequate funds for operational reserves or periodic expenditures including installments collected for long-term improvement projects. Each parcel is assessed proportionately for only those improvements, services, and expenses for which the parcel will receive special benefit.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (“APN”) by the County Assessor’s Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for the special benefit assessments.

Description of Improvements and Services
Improvements include but are not limited to landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, fixtures, and appurtenant facilities, in public rights-of-way, parkways, slopes, trails, open space and dedicated easements within the boundaries of said Assessment District. The following are the facilities to be maintained within the District:
• Landscape Maintenance (Park-Flat) includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacement.
• Arena Maintenance includes grading and replenishment of DG and maintenance of rail. • Equestrian Trails include minor grading, replacement of wooden posts and rails, and addition of decomposed granite for trail surface.
• Landscape Maintenance (Slope - Park & Arena) includes plant maintenance, weed, and pest control, and debris cleanup.
• Slope Maintenance includes all pruning, weed and pest control, fertilization, turf care, trash and debris cleanup, irrigation to include maintenance and repair, water cost, electrical cost for controllers, tree trimming up to 15 feet, tree staking, backflow testing, rodent control and plant replacement for exterior slopes along Fifth Street and California Ave.
• Landscape Maintenance (Parkways) includes weeding, feeding of ground cover and maintenance and trimming of street trees.

Page 539 of 695 ends

1. Plans and Specifications
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 2
Capital Improvement Projects
The work to be performed under this project shall consist of furnishing all labor, materials, equipment, and incidentals necessary to continue the installation of white vinyl fencing throughout Landscape Maintenance District 5 during the upcoming fiscal year, along with parkway irrigation improvements through the conversion of existing irrigation systems to drip irrigation. The project includes the removal and replacement of existing fencing where necessary, installation of new commercial‐grade white vinyl fencing, modifications to existing irrigation infrastructure, installation of drip irrigation components, and restoration of all disturbed areas. The improvements are intended to enhance the overall appearance of the district, improve irrigation efficiency, reduce water consumption, and support the long‐term maintenance and sustainability of landscaped areas within the district.

Page 540 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 3
The estimated costs for the operation, maintenance and servicing of the facilities, shown in Table 2-1, are the estimated costs of maintenance if the facilities were fully maintained for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The 1972 Act provides that the total cost of the maintenance and services, together with incidental expenses, may be financed from the assessment proceeds. The incidental expenses may include engineering fees, legal fees, printing, mailing, postage, publishing, and all other related costs identified with district proceedings.

The 1972 Act requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of the District. Funds raised by assessments shall be used only for the purpose as stated herein. The City may advance funds to the District, if needed, to ensure adequate cash flow, and will be reimbursed for any such advances upon receipt of assessments.

Any surplus or deficit remaining on July 1 must be carried over to the next fiscal year.

The cost of servicing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing the actual improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications is summarized in Table 2-1.

Page 541 of 695 ends

2. Cost Estimate
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 4
Table 2‐1
Budget Details
Direct Costs FY 2025‐26 FY 2026‐27
Landscape Maintenance $22,000   $22,336
Arena Maintenance $0   $0
Park Maintenance $0   $0
Equestrian Trails $0   $0
Natural Open Space $0   $0
Tree and Plant Replacement and Removal $0   $0
Utility ‐ Water $9,000   $10,000
Utility ‐ Electrical $700   $700
Utility ‐ Phone $80   $80
Total Direct Costs $31,780   $33,116
Indirect Costs
City Staff to Manage District $12,328   $12,792
Professional Services $4,100   $4,000
City Overhead/Administration $3,100   $3,100
County Administration Fees $105   $105
Fuel $80   $80
Incidentals $1,000   $0
Proposition 218 Proceeding $0   $0
Total Indirect Costs   $20,713   $20,077
Total Direct & Indirect Costs $52,493   $53,193
Adjustments
Operating Reserve collection/Contribution ($11,504) ($2,454) Capital Replacement Collection/Contribution $30,000   $25,000 Total Adjustments $18,496   $22,546
Total Assessment (1) $70,989   $75,739
Individual Assessment
Total Parcels 50 50
Maximum Allowable Levy per Parcel $1,496.51   $1,542.74 Proposed Levy per Parcel $1,419.78   $1,514.78
Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Operating Reserve $42,394   $19,012
Operating Reserve Collection/Contribution ($11,504) ($2,454) Est. Ending Operating Reserve (2) $30,890   $16,558
Beginning Capital Replacement Reserve $19,202   $48,663 Capital Reserve Collection/Contribution $30,000   $25,000 Est. Ending Capital Replacement Reserve (3) $49,202   $73,663 (1) Slight variance due to rounding. (2) The Operating Reserve Fund may equal up to 50% of the estimated annual cost of providing services funded by the District and shall be used to pay the cost of services until the District receives funds from the assessment levy. (3) The Capital Replacement Reserve fund will be used for capital improvement projects including the cost to replace and/or renovate larger, more expensive improvements within the benefit zone. These improvements have finite life expectancies and will need to be replaced at some point in the future. On an annual basis, any non‐expended assessment monies, in excess of the Operating Reserve Contribution, will be transferred to the Capital Replacement Reserve fund until such time as there are sufficient monies to pay for these and/or other unforeseen improvement costs.

Page 542 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 5
Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218, entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act,” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are described below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessments imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the City will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase).

Proposition 218 does not define the term “streets,” however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that streets include all public improvements located within the street rights-of-way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property.” Cal. Const., art. XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees, and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessments, and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements, which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addition to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.”
By its nature, most public improvements financed through an assessment district contain an element of public benefit. The test is: does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that the portion of the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties.

Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

Below is the description of the Method of Apportionment and Special Benefit and the Assessment Roll summary for the Assessment District.

Page 543 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 6
Improvements Authorized by the 1972 Act
As applicable or may be applicable to this proposed District, the 1972 Act defines improvements to mean one or any combination of the following:
• The installation or planting of landscaping.
• The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities. • The installation or construction of public lighting facilities. • The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities. • The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing. • The acquisition of any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
• The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment; • The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting, and mailing of notices; • Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; • Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; • Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
• Any expenses incidental to the issuance of bonds or notes pursuant to Section 22662.5. • Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

The 1972 Act defines "Maintain" or "maintenance" to mean the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including:
• Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. • Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury. • The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste. • The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti.

Method of Apportionment
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the “Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972,” must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district proceedings. The Assessment Engineer is appointed for the purpose of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings, the City has based its determination on standard assessment practices utilized by consulting civil engineers with a background of experience in the design of such works of improvement and experience in the completion of assessment district formation projects.

IDENTIFYING THE BENEFIT
It is necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvement will render to the properties within the Assessment District. The landscaping, irrigation, and equestrian trails have been designed and will be constructed for the benefit of enhanced aesthetics and neighborhood identity for all properties within the Assessment District.

Page 544 of 695 ends

3. Method of Apportionment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 7

APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this case, several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment.

The individual parcels of land within the Assessment District are currently developed or have the potential for development to single-family residential units. The proposed improvements are designed to enhance the appearance and appeal of the District and all of the parcels within. The improvements will provide a sense of neighborhood identity for the District. As such, each parcel will benefit equally from the proposed improvements.

ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT
The assessments may be increased annually for inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index – All Urban Consumers for the Los Angeles – Riverside-Orange County Area (CPI), as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, this Department shall use a revised index or comparable system for determining fluctuations in the cost of living, as approved by the City Council. The Maximum Assessment is defined as the initial Assessment (approved by property owners within the District) adjusted annually by the CPI. If the proposed annual assessment for a given Fiscal Year is less than or equal to the calculated Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment.

In January 2018, the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, discontinued the Los Angeles - Riverside - Orange County Consumer Price Index and created a new Riverside - San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index. This new index was used to escalate the Maximum Assessment Rate by 3.09% for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. The maximum per parcel assessment increased from $1,496.51 to $1,542.74.

Page 545 of 695 ends

4. Assessment
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 8
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Secured Roll for the year in which this Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts, is presented in Appendix A.

Page 546 of 695 ends

5. Assessment Diagram
City of Norco Landscape Maintenance District No. 5
Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 9
An Assessment Diagram for the District is on file in the office of the City Clerk. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County of Riverside, for the year when this Report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made a part of this Report. A reduced scale map depicting the assessment diagram is attached hereto.

Legal Description of Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Hawk’s Crest) That certain real property situated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, more particularly described as follows:

Lots 1 through 50 inclusive, of Tract No. 30230 in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 344, Pages 40 through 45, inclusive, of Maps in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County.

Page 547 of 695 ends

APPENDIX A
Assessment Roll

Page 548 of 695 ends

Total 50 $75,739.00
APN Levy
123530001 $1,514.78
123530005 $1,514.78
123530009 $1,514.78
123530013 $1,514.78
123530017 $1,514.78
123530021 $1,514.78
123530025 $1,514.78
123531004 $1,514.78
123531008 $1,514.78
133330006 $1,514.78
133330010 $1,514.78
133330014 $1,514.78
133330018 $1,514.78
APN Levy
123530002 $1,514.78
123530006 $1,514.78
123530010 $1,514.78
123530014 $1,514.78
123530018 $1,514.78
123530022 $1,514.78
123531001 $1,514.78
123531005 $1,514.78
123531009 $1,514.78
133330007 $1,514.78
133330011 $1,514.78
133330015 $1,514.78
133330019 $1,514.78
APN Levy
123530003 $1,514.78
123530007 $1,514.78
123530011 $1,514.78
123530015 $1,514.78
123530019 $1,514.78
123530023 $1,514.78
123531002 $1,514.78
123531006 $1,514.78
123531010 $1,514.78
133330008 $1,514.78
133330012 $1,514.78
133330016 $1,514.78
APN Levy
123530004 $1,514.78
123530008 $1,514.78
123530012 $1,514.78
123530016 $1,514.78
123530020 $1,514.78
123530024 $1,514.78
123531003 $1,514.78
123531007 $1,514.78
133330005 $1,514.78
133330009 $1,514.78
133330013 $1,514.78
133330017 $1,514.78
Albert A. Webb Associates Page 1 of 1 Execution Time: 5/12/2026 10:36:07 AM Fiscal Year 2026-27 Assessment Roll
City of Norco 682521 - LMD No. 5

Page 549 of 695 ends

APPENDIX B
Assessment Diagram

Page 550 of 695 ends

L
andscapeMaintenanceDistrct5(HawksCrest)

CUTTING HORSE RD

CAVALETTILN
F
I
F
T
H
S
T
G
U
L
F
S
T
R
E
A
M
L
N

CALIFORNIA
AVE

AINTREE
DOWNS
DR
C
A
L
I
E
N
T
E
D
R
P
O
M
PA
N
O
P
L
LEGENDDis
trictBoundary
Landscaping
Park
EquestrianTrail
M:\GIS-Assessment\Norco\Improvements_LMD5_Hawks_Crest.mxd; 29 Apr 2024 05001,000Fe
et

CITYOFNORCO
Riverside Co. July, 2024
ImprovementLocationMap

Page 551 of 695 ends
Page 552 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-26

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S “PRELIMINARY
REPORT” AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 IN SAID DISTRICT.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of an Engineer’s “Report” for the annual levy of assessments, consisting of plans and specifications, an estimate of the cost, a diagram of the district, and an assessment relating to what is now known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (BEAZER)
(hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the “Report” as required by said Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and as previously directed by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has now carefully examined and reviewed the “Report” as presented and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the maintenance to be performed as set forth in said “Report.”
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the “Report” as presented, consisting of the following:

A. Plans and specifications;
B. Estimate of cost;
C. Diagram of the District;
D. Assessment of the estimated cost;
is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Page 553 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-26, Beazer

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s “Report.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_________________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 554 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-27

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S “PRELIMINARY
REPORT” AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 IN SAID DISTRICT FOR LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of an Engineer’s “Report” for the annual levy of assessments, consisting of plans and specifications, an estimate of the cost, a diagram of the district, and an assessment relating to what is now known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTERN PACIFIC) (hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the “Report” as required by said Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and as previously directed by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has now carefully examined and reviewed the “Report” as presented and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the maintenance to be performed as set forth in said “Report.”
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the “Report” as presented, consisting of the following:

A. Plans and specifications;
B. Estimate of cost;
C. Diagram of the District;
D. Assessment of the estimated cost;
is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Page 555 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-27, Western Pacific

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s “Report.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_________________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 556 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-28

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S “PRELIMINARY
REPORT” AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 IN SAID DISTRICT.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of an Engineer’s “Report” for the annual levy of assessments, consisting of plans and specifications, an estimate of the cost, a diagram of the district, and an assessment relating to what is now known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (CENTEX)
(hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the “Report” as required by said Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and as previously directed by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has now carefully examined and reviewed the “Report” as presented and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the maintenance to be performed as set forth in said “Report.”
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the “Report” as presented, consisting of the following:

A. Plans and specifications;
B. Estimate of cost;
C. Diagram of the District;
D. Assessment of the estimated cost;
is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Page 557 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-28, Centex

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s “Report.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_________________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 558 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-29

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S “PRELIMINARY
REPORT” AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 IN SAID DISTRICT.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of an Engineer’s “Report” for the annual levy of assessments, consisting of plans and specifications, an estimate of the cost, a diagram of the district, and an assessment relating to what is now known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (NORCO RIDGE RANCH) (hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the three optional “Reports” as required by said Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and as previously directed by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has now carefully examined and reviewed the “Report” as presented and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the maintenance to be performed as set forth in said “Report.”
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the “Reports” as presented, consisting of the following:

A. Plans and specifications;
B. Estimate of cost;
C. Diagram of the District;
D. Assessment of the estimated cost;
is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Page 559 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-29, Norco Ridge Ranch

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s “Reports.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_________________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 560 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-30

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENGINEER’S “PRELIMINARY
REPORT” AND THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 IN SAID DISTRICT.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of an Engineer’s “Report” for the annual levy of assessments, consisting of plans and specifications, an estimate of the cost, a diagram of the district, and an assessment relating to what is now known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (HAWK’S CREST)
(hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the “Report” as required by said Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code and as previously directed by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has now carefully examined and reviewed the “Report” as presented and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the maintenance to be performed as set forth in said “Report.”
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, does hereby resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

SECTION 2: That the “Report” as presented, consisting of the following:

A. Plans and specifications;
B. Estimate of cost;
C. Diagram of the District;
D. Assessment of the estimated cost;
is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection.

Page 561 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-30, Hawk’s Crest

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
SECTION 3: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Engineer’s “Report.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_________________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 562 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-31

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CITY’S INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN

ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN

MAINTENANCE IN AN EXISTING DISTRICT, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, desires to continue a Landscaping Maintenance District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Landscaping and Street Lighting Act of 1972,” being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (BEAZER)
(hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the territory within the District for the next ensuing fiscal year, to provide for the costs and expenses necessary for continual maintenance of improvements within said District; and
WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented and approved this City Council, the Engineer’s “Report” as required by law, and this City Council is desirous of proceeding with the proceedings for said annual levy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, California, does resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

PUBLIC INTEREST
SECTION 2: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of special assessments for the continual maintenance of certain improvements, all to serve and benefit said District as said area is shown and delineated on a map as previously approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, open to public inspection, and herein so referenced and made a part hereof, and proposed changes thereto are set forth in the “Report” of the Engineer, incorporated herein as a part hereof.

Page 563 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-31, Beazer

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
REPORT
SECTION 3: That the “Report” of the Engineer regarding the annual levy for said District, which “Report” is for maintenance for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is hereby approved and is directed to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk.

ASSESSMENT
SECTION 4: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual assessment levy for the District as set forth and described in said Engineer’s “Report,” and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expense of said maintenance and improvement as estimated in said “Report.”

DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE
SECTION 5: The assessments levied and collected shall be for the maintenance of certain landscaping and street lighting improvements, as set forth in the Engineer’s “Report,” referenced and so incorporated herein.

COUNTY AUDITOR
SECTION 6: The County Auditor shall enter on the County Assessment Roll the amount of the assessments and shall collect said assessments at the time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments, after the deduction of any compensation due to the County for collection, shall be paid to the Treasurer for the purpose of paying for the costs and expenses of said District.

SPECIAL FUND
SECTION 7: That all monies collected shall be deposited in a special fund known as:
“SPECIAL FUND, CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (BEAZER)”

Page 564 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-31, Beazer

Page 3 ends

May 20, 2026
Payment shall be made out of said fund only for the purpose provided for in this Resolution, and in order to expedite the making of this maintenance and improvement, the City Council may transfer into said funds as it may deem necessary to expedite the proceedings. Any funds shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the assessments provided for in this Resolution.

BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT
SECTION 8: Said contemplated maintenance work is, in the opinion of this City Council, of direct benefit to the properties within the boundaries of the District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of said maintenance chargeable upon a district, which district said City Council hereby declares to be the district benefited by said improvement said maintenance, and to be further assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Said District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries of said District, as said District is shown on a map as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of the District.

SECTION 9: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON JUNE 3, 2026 AT THE HOUR OF 7 P.M., IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED AT 2870 CLARK

AVENUE, NORCO, CALIFORNIA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED BY THE CITY

COUNCIL FOR THE HEARING OF PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS IN REFERENCE

TO THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS, TO THE EXTENT OF THE

MAINTENANCE, AND ANY OTHER MATTERS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION BY THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED HEREBY. ANY PERSONS WHO WISH

TO OBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD FILE A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH

THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE TIME SET AND SCHEDULED FOR SAID PUBLIC HEARING.

NOTICE
SECTION 10: The City Clerk is directed to publish this Resolution of Intention pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, said publication to be completed no later than ten days prior to the date set for the Public Hearing.

EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 11: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Page 565 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-31, Beazer

Page 4 ends

May 20, 2026

PROCEEDINGS INQUIRIES
SECTION 12: For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person(s) at the agency or department so designated:

Charmaine McCarvel or Nadia Benali
Webb Municipal Finance, LLC
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, California 92506
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_____________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Page 566 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-31, Beazer

Page 5 ends

May 20, 2026
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 567 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-32

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CITY’S INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN

ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN

MAINTENANCE IN AN EXISTING DISTRICT, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, desires to continue a Landscaping Maintenance District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Landscaping and Street Lighting Act of 1972,” being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTERN PACIFIC) (hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the territory within the District for the next ensuing fiscal year, to provide for the costs and expenses necessary for continual maintenance of improvements within said District; and
WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented and approved this City Council, the Engineer’s “Report” as required by law, and this City Council is desirous of proceeding with the proceedings for said annual levy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, California, does resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

PUBLIC INTEREST
SECTION 2: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of special assessments for the continual maintenance of certain improvements, all to serve and benefit said District as said area is shown and delineated on a map as previously approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, open to public inspection, and herein so referenced and made a part hereof, and proposed changes thereto are set forth in the “Report” of the Engineer, incorporated herein as a part hereof.

Page 568 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-32, Western Pacific

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
REPORT
SECTION 3: That the “Report” of the Engineer regarding the annual levy for said District, which “Report” is for maintenance for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is hereby approved and is directed to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk.

ASSESSMENT
SECTION 4: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual assessment levy for the District as set forth and described in said Engineer’s “Report,” and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expense of said maintenance and improvement as estimated in said “Report.”

DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE
SECTION 5: The assessments levied and collected shall be for the maintenance of certain landscaping and street lighting improvements, as set forth in the Engineer’s “Report,” referenced and so incorporated herein.

COUNTY AUDITOR
SECTION 6: The County Auditor shall enter on the County Assessment Roll the amount of the assessments and shall collect said assessments at the time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments, after the deduction of any compensation due to the County for collection, shall be paid to the Treasurer for the purpose of paying for the costs and expenses of said District.

SPECIAL FUND
SECTION 7: That all monies collected shall be deposited in a special fund known as:
“SPECIAL FUND, CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (WESTERN PACIFIC)”

Page 569 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-32, Western Pacific

Page 3 ends

May 20, 2026
Payment shall be made out of said fund only for the purpose provided for in this Resolution, and in order to expedite the making of this maintenance and improvement, the City Council may transfer into said funds as it may deem necessary to expedite the proceedings. Any funds shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the assessments provided for in this Resolution.

BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT
SECTION 8: Said contemplated maintenance work is, in the opinion of this City Council, of direct benefit to the properties within the boundaries of the District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of said maintenance chargeable upon a district, which district said City Council hereby declares to be the district benefited by said improvement said maintenance, and to be further assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Said District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries of said District, as said District is shown on a map as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of the District.

SECTION 9: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON JUNE 3, 2026 AT THE HOUR OF 7 P.M., IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED AT 2870 CLARK

AVENUE, NORCO, CALIFORNIA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED BY THE CITY

COUNCIL FOR THE HEARING OF PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS IN REFERENCE

TO THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS, TO THE EXTENT OF THE

MAINTENANCE, AND ANY OTHER MATTERS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION BY THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED HEREBY. ANY PERSONS WHO WISH

TO OBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD FILE A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH

THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE TIME SET AND SCHEDULED FOR SAID PUBLIC HEARING.

NOTICE
SECTION 10: The City Clerk is directed to publish this Resolution of Intention pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, said publication to be completed no later than ten days prior to the date set for the Public Hearing.

EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 11: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Page 570 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-32, Western Pacific

Page 4 ends

May 20, 2026

PROCEEDINGS INQUIRIES
SECTION 12: For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person(s) at the local agency or department so designated:

Charmaine McCarvel or Nadia Benali
Webb Municipal Finance, LLC
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, California 92506
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_____________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Page 571 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-32, Western Pacific

Page 5 ends

May 20, 2026
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 572 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-33

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CITY’S INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN

ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN

MAINTENANCE IN AN EXISTING DISTRICT, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, desires to continue a Landscaping Maintenance District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Landscaping and Street Lighting Act of 1972,” being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (CENTEX)
(hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the territory within the District for the next ensuing fiscal year, to provide for the costs and expenses necessary for continual maintenance of improvements within said District; and
WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented and approved this City Council, the Engineer’s “Report” as required by law, and this City Council is desirous of proceeding with the proceedings for said annual levy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, California, does resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

PUBLIC INTEREST
SECTION 2: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of special assessments for the continual maintenance of certain improvements, all to serve and benefit said District as said area is shown and delineated on a map as previously approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, open to public inspection, and herein so referenced and made a part hereof, and proposed changes thereto are set forth in the “Report” of the Engineer, incorporated herein as a part hereof.

Page 573 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-33, Centex

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
REPORT
SECTION 3: That the “Report” of the Engineer regarding the annual levy for said District, which “Report” is for maintenance for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is hereby approved and is directed to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk.

ASSESSMENT
SECTION 4: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual assessment levy for the District as set forth and described in said Engineer’s “Report,” and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expense of said maintenance and improvement as estimated in said “Report.”

DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE
SECTION 5: The assessments levied and collected shall be for the maintenance of certain landscaping and street lighting improvements, as set forth in the Engineer’s “Report,” referenced and so incorporated herein.

COUNTY AUDITOR
SECTION 6: The County Auditor shall enter on the County Assessment Roll the amount of the assessments and shall collect said assessments at the time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments, after the deduction of any compensation due to the County for collection, shall be paid to the Treasurer for the purpose of paying for the costs and expenses of said District.

SPECIAL FUND
SECTION 7: That all monies collected shall be deposited in a special fund known as:
“SPECIAL FUND, CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (CENTEX)”

Page 574 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-33, Centex

Page 3 ends

May 20, 2026
Payment shall be made out of said fund only for the purpose provided for in this Resolution, and in order to expedite the making of this maintenance and improvement, the City Council may transfer into said funds as it may deem necessary to expedite the proceedings. Any funds shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the assessments provided for in this Resolution.

BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT
SECTION 8: Said contemplated maintenance work is, in the opinion of this City Council, of direct benefit to the properties within the boundaries of the District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of said maintenance chargeable upon a district, which district said City Council hereby declares to be the district benefited by said improvement said maintenance, and to be further assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Said District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries of said District, as said District is shown on a map as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of the District.

SECTION 9: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON JUNE 3, 2026 AT THE HOUR OF 7 P.M., IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED AT 2870 CLARK

AVENUE, NORCO, CALIFORNIA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED BY THE CITY

COUNCIL FOR THE HEARING OF PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS IN REFERENCE

TO THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS, TO THE EXTENT OF THE

MAINTENANCE, AND ANY OTHER MATTERS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION BY THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED HEREBY. ANY PERSONS WHO WISH

TO OBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD FILE A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH

THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE TIME SET AND SCHEDULED FOR SAID PUBLIC HEARING.

NOTICE
SECTION 10: The City Clerk is directed to publish this Resolution of Intention pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, said publication to be completed no later than ten days prior to the date set for the Public Hearing.

EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 11: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Page 575 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-33, Centex

Page 4 ends

May 20, 2026

PROCEEDINGS INQUIRIES
SECTION 12: For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person(s) at the local agency or department so designated:

Charmaine McCarvel or Nadia Benali
Webb Municipal Finance, LLC
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, California 92506
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_____________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Page 576 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-33, Centex

Page 5 ends

May 20, 2026
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 577 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-34

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CITY’S INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN

ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN

MAINTENANCE IN AN EXISTING DISTRICT, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, desires to continue a Landscaping Maintenance District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Landscaping and Street Lighting Act of 1972,” being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (NORCO RIDGE RANCH) (hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the territory within the District for the next ensuing fiscal year, to provide for the costs and expenses necessary for continual maintenance of improvements within said District; and
WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented and approved this City Council, the Engineer’s “Report” as required by law, and this City Council is desirous of proceeding with the proceedings for said annual levy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, California, does resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

PUBLIC INTEREST
SECTION 2: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of special assessments for the continual maintenance of certain improvements, all to serve and benefit said District as said area is shown and delineated on a map as previously approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, open to public inspection, and herein so referenced and made a part hereof, and proposed changes thereto are set forth in the “Report” of the Engineer, incorporated herein as a part hereof.

Page 578 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-34, Norco Ridge Ranch

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
REPORT
SECTION 3: That the “Reports” of the Engineer regarding the annual levy for said District, which “Reports” at three optional funding levels is for maintenance for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is hereby approved and is directed to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk.

ASSESSMENT
SECTION 4: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual assessment levy for the District as set forth and described in said Engineer’s “Reports,” and further it is determined to be which funding level is in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expense of said maintenance and improvement as estimated in said “Report.”

DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE
SECTION 5: The assessments levied and collected shall be for the maintenance of certain landscaping and street lighting improvements, as set forth in the Engineer’s “Report,” referenced and so incorporated herein.

COUNTY AUDITOR
SECTION 6: The County Auditor shall enter on the County Assessment Roll the amount of the assessments and shall collect said assessments at the time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments, after the deduction of any compensation due to the County for collection, shall be paid to the Treasurer for the purpose of paying for the costs and expenses of said District.

SPECIAL FUND
SECTION 7: That all monies collected shall be deposited in a special fund known as:
“SPECIAL FUND, CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (NORCO RIDGE RANCH)”

Page 579 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-34, Norco Ridge Ranch

Page 3 ends

May 20, 2026
Payment shall be made out of said fund only for the purpose provided for in this Resolution, and in order to expedite the making of this maintenance and improvement, the City Council may transfer into said funds as it may deem necessary to expedite the proceedings. Any funds shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the assessments provided for in this Resolution.

BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT
SECTION 8: Said contemplated maintenance work is, in the opinion of this City Council, of direct benefit to the properties within the boundaries of the District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of said maintenance chargeable upon a district, which district said City Council hereby declares to be the district benefited by said improvement said maintenance, and to be further assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Said District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries of said District, as said District is shown on a map as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of the District.

SECTION 9: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON JUNE 3, 2026 AT THE HOUR OF 7 P.M., IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED AT 2870 CLARK

AVENUE, NORCO, CALIFORNIA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED BY THE CITY

COUNCIL FOR THE HEARING OF PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS IN REFERENCE

TO THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS, TO THE EXTENT OF THE

MAINTENANCE, AND ANY OTHER MATTERS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION BY THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED HEREBY. ANY PERSONS WHO WISH

TO OBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD FILE A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH

THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE TIME SET AND SCHEDULED FOR SAID PUBLIC HEARING.

NOTICE
SECTION 10: The City Clerk is directed to publish this Resolution of Intention pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, said publication to be completed no later than ten days prior to the date set for the Public Hearing.

EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 11: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Page 580 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-34, Norco Ridge Ranch

Page 4 ends

May 20, 2026

PROCEEDINGS INQUIRIES
SECTION 12: For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person(s) at the local agency or department so designated:

Charmaine McCarvel or Nadia Benali
Webb Municipal Finance, LLC
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, California 92506
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_____________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Page 581 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-34, Norco Ridge Ranch

Page 5 ends

May 20, 2026
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 582 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-35

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, DECLARING CITY’S INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR AN

ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CERTAIN

MAINTENANCE IN AN EXISTING DISTRICT, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Norco, California, desires to continue a Landscaping Maintenance District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the “Landscaping and Street Lighting Act of 1972,” being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, known and designated as:

CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (HAWK’S CREST)
(hereinafter referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, at this time, this City Council is desirous to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the territory within the District for the next ensuing fiscal year, to provide for the costs and expenses necessary for continual maintenance of improvements within said District; and
WHEREAS, at this time there has been presented and approved this City Council, the Engineer’s “Report” as required by law, and this City Council is desirous of proceeding with the proceedings for said annual levy.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, California, does resolve, determine, and order as follows:

SECTION 1: That the above recitals are all true and correct.

PUBLIC INTEREST
SECTION 2: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of special assessments for the continual maintenance of certain improvements, all to serve and benefit said District as said area is shown and delineated on a map as previously approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, open to public inspection, and herein so referenced and made a part hereof, and proposed changes thereto are set forth in the “Report” of the Engineer, incorporated herein as a part hereof.

Page 583 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-35, Hawk’s Crest

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
REPORT
SECTION 3: That the “Report” of the Engineer regarding the annual levy for said District, which “Report” is for maintenance for the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 is hereby approved and is directed to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk.

ASSESSMENT
SECTION 4: That the public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order the annual assessment levy for the District as set forth and described in said Engineer’s “Report,” and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expense of said maintenance and improvement as estimated in said “Report.”

DESCRIPTION OF MAINTENANCE
SECTION 5: The assessments levied and collected shall be for the maintenance of certain landscaping and street lighting improvements, as set forth in the Engineer’s “Report,” referenced and so incorporated herein.

COUNTY AUDITOR
SECTION 6: The County Auditor shall enter on the County Assessment Roll the amount of the assessments and shall collect said assessments at the time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected. After collection by the County, the net amount of the assessments, after the deduction of any compensation due to the County for collection, shall be paid to the Treasurer for the purpose of paying for the costs and expenses of said District.

SPECIAL FUND
SECTION 7: That all monies collected shall be deposited in a special fund known as:
“SPECIAL FUND, CITY OF NORCO
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (HAWK’S CREST)”

Page 584 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-35, Hawk’s Crest

Page 3 ends

May 20, 2026
Payment shall be made out of said fund only for the purpose provided for in this Resolution, and in order to expedite the making of this maintenance and improvement, the City Council may transfer into said funds as it may deem necessary to expedite the proceedings. Any funds shall be repaid out of the proceeds of the assessments provided for in this Resolution.

BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT
SECTION 8: Said contemplated maintenance work is, in the opinion of this City Council, of direct benefit to the properties within the boundaries of the District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of said maintenance chargeable upon a district, which district said City Council hereby declares to be the district benefited by said improvement said maintenance, and to be further assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Said District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries of said District, as said District is shown on a map as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of the District.

SECTION 9: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON JUNE 3, 2026 AT THE HOUR OF 7 P.M., IN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS LOCATED AT 2870 CLARK

AVENUE, NORCO, CALIFORNIA, IS THE TIME AND PLACE FIXED BY THE CITY

COUNCIL FOR THE HEARING OF PROTESTS OR OBJECTIONS IN REFERENCE

TO THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS, TO THE EXTENT OF THE

MAINTENANCE, AND ANY OTHER MATTERS CONTAINED IN THIS RESOLUTION BY THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED HEREBY. ANY PERSONS WHO WISH

TO OBJECT TO THE PROCEEDINGS SHOULD FILE A WRITTEN PROTEST WITH

THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE TIME SET AND SCHEDULED FOR SAID PUBLIC HEARING.

NOTICE
SECTION 10: The City Clerk is directed to publish this Resolution of Intention pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, said publication to be completed no later than ten days prior to the date set for the Public Hearing.

EFFECTIVE DATE
SECTION 11: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Page 585 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-35, Hawk’s Crest

Page 4 ends

May 20, 2026

PROCEEDINGS INQUIRIES
SECTION 12: For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person(s) at the local agency or department so designated:

Charmaine McCarvel or Nadia Benali
Webb Municipal Finance, LLC
3788 McCray Street
Riverside, California 92506
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
_____________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Page 586 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-35, Hawk’s Crest

Page 5 ends

May 20, 2026
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, held on May 20, 2026.
________________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 587 of 695 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 20, 2026 Agenda Item:

3.H.

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Sam Nelson, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sam Nelson, Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Ratification of Fiscal Year 2026-27 Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority Budget
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2026-25, approving the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority Budget, establishing rates to be charged for conveyance, treatment and disposal of wastewater.

SUMMARY:

The City of Norco is a member agency of the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority (WRCRWA). Each member agency is required to present the adopted fiscal year budget document to their governing body for ratification. The budget details are attached for review and is appropriate for the City Council to ratify the document.

BACKGROUND:

Attached is a copy of the WRCRWA Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating and Capital Improvements Budget, establishing rates and charges effective July 1, 2026. The Budget document was approved by the WRCRWA Board at their April 16, 2026 meeting (See FY 2026-27 WRCRWA Budget).

The budget data was first reviewed by the Executive Committee with an unanimous recommendation for approval by the Board of Directors. In the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget, Member Agency contributions will increase in aggregate by $4,194,288 or 14.9%. The Operating Budget will increase by $780,186, or 5.9%; the Debt Service Budget remains the same, and the Capital Budget will increase by $3,414,102, or 32.8% mainly due to unspent budget carried over. Specifically for Norco, the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating Budget will increase by $168,171, or 6.5%; the Debt

Page 588 of 695 ends

Service Budget will remain unchanged in the amount of $408,275, and the Capital Budget will increase by $678,095 or 32.3%.

Compared to Fiscal Year 2025-26 rates, the fixed charge component per million gallons a day treated (MGD) per month is increasing $1,733 from $44,927 to $46,660 or 3.8% and the variable charge per million gallons is increasing $172 from $1,795 to $1,967 or

9.6%. This data is described in more detail in the FY 2026-27 WRCRWA budget document. The budget document describes the wastewater treatment capacity and conveyance system costs as well as the member agency bond debt and Capital Improvement responsibilities. The City of Norco will contribute $2,775,951 to the Capital Improvement component during Fiscal Year 2026-27 if the proposed projects are constructed.

Upon the Council's favorable consideration and approval of the WRCRWA Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget, staff will provide the Authority with a copy of the Resolution and a minute excerpt of Council's action to satisfy the ratification requirement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

City staff has included the cost for treatment and collection as well as outstanding debt service requirements in the City's Fiscal Year 2026-27 Sewer Operations Budget.

Capital Improvements outlined in the WRCRWA budget have also been included in the City's Fiscal Year 2026-27 Sewer Capital Improvement Fund Budget. For the City of Norco, the overall net change in the year to year budget will be an increases of $846,266 or 16.7%.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 5 - "Infrastructure and Asset Management"
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

FY 2026-27 WRCRWA Budget
Resolution No. 2026-25
Staff Report

Page 589 of 695 ends
Page 590 of 695 ends
Page 591 of 695 ends
Page 592 of 695 ends
Page 593 of 695 ends
Page 594 of 695 ends
Page 595 of 695 ends
Page 596 of 695 ends
Page 597 of 695 ends

Expenditure Category Corona HGSD JCSD Norco Western Total Operations:

Treatment System $ 1,720,312 $ 683,558 $ 5,778,281 $ 2,223,734 $ 1,249,310 $ 11,655,195 Conveyance System 111,089 44,483 139,339 - 85,710 380,621 General & Administration 358,727 102,689 821,514 369,681 264,253 1,916,864 Total Operating Contributions $ 2,190,128 $ 830,730 $ 6,599,795 $ 2,732,754 $ 1,599,273 $ 13,952,680 Debt Service:

SRF Loan $ 1,903,189 $ 70,887 $ 2,064,704 $ 408,275 $ 39,481 $ 4,486,536 Capital:

Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects (1) $ 2,358,018 $ 674,997 $ 4,987,603 $ 2,416,336 $ 1,750,821 $ 12,187,775 Asset Replacement Reserve Funding 358,017 102,485 539,663 359,615 273,077 1,632,857 Total Capital Contributions $ 2,716,035 $ 777,482 $ 5,527,266 $ 2,775,951 $ 2,023,898 $ 13,820,632 Total Member Contributions $ 6,809,352 $ 1,679,099 $ 14,191,765 $ 5,916,980 $ 3,662,652 $ 32,259,848 Expenditure Category Corona HGSD JCSD Norco Western Total Operations:

Treatment System $ 1,667,901 $ 646,867 $ 5,310,410 $ 2,067,623 $ 1,209,982 $ 10,902,783 Conveyance System 108,788 41,997 129,466 - 83,933 364,184 General & Administration 356,606 102,082 816,655 367,494 262,690 1,905,527 Total Operating Contributions $ 2,133,295 $ 790,946 $ 6,127,065 $ 2,564,583 $ 1,556,605 $ 13,172,494 Debt Service:

SRF Loan $ 1,903,189 $ 70,887 $ 2,064,704 $ 408,275 $ 39,481 $ 4,486,536 Capital:

Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects (1) $ 1,723,758 $ 493,437 $ 3,637,081 $ 1,766,091 $ 1,280,183 $ 8,900,550 Asset Replacement Reserve Funding 330,307 94,553 497,397 331,765 251,958 1,505,980 Total Capital Contributions $ 2,054,065 $ 587,990 $ 4,134,478 $ 2,097,856 $ 1,532,141 $ 10,406,530 Total Member Contributions $ 6,090,549 $ 1,449,823 $ 12,326,247 $ 5,070,714 $ 3,128,227 $ 28,065,560 Total Member Contribution YTY Change $ 718,803 $ 229,276 $ 1,865,518 $ 846,266 $ 534,425 $ 4,194,288 % Changes 11.8% 15.8% 15.1% 16.7% 17.1% 14.9%
% Changes, excluding carried over CIP 1.6% 3.8% 3.0% 4.4% 2.7% 3.0% (1) $6,989,775 is proposed to carry over from FY 2025-2026 to FY 2026-2027; $3,522,500 is carried over from FY 2024-2025 to FY 2025-2026 Adopted Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget
WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Member Contribution Summary Year-to-Year Comparison
Proposed Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Attachment 1

Page 598 of 695 ends

Capacity Contribution Capacity Contribution Capacity Contribution Total by Agency Corona 2.62 $ 1,046,801 2.62 $ 66,391 2.62 $ 358,727 $ 1,471,919 HGSD 0.75 $ 299,657 0.75 $ 19,005 0.75 $ 102,689 $ 421,351 JCSD 6.00 $ 2,397,255 - $ - 6.00 $ 821,514 $ 3,218,769
Norco 2.70 $ 1,078,765 2.50 $ 63,351 2.70 $ 369,681 $ 1,511,797 WMWD 1.93 $ 771,117 2.13 $ 53,974 1.93 $ 264,253 $ 1,089,344 Total 14.00 $ 5,593,595 8.00 $ 202,721 14.00 $ 1,916,864 $ 7,713,180 Est. Flows Rate Est. Flows Rate Est. Flows Rate Total by Agency Corona 1.00 $ 673,511 1.00 $ 44,698 - $ - $ 718,209
HGSD 0.57 $ 383,901 0.57 $ 25,478 - $ - $ 409,379
JCSD 5.02 $ 3,381,026 - $ - - $ - $ 3,381,026
Norco 1.70 $ 1,144,969 1.70 $ 75,988 - $ - $ 1,220,957
WMWD 0.71 $ 478,193 0.71 $ 31,736 - $ - $ 509,929
Total 9.00 $ 6,061,600 3.98 $ 177,900 - $ - $ 6,239,500 Grand Totals $ 11,655,195 $ 380,621 $ 1,916,864 $ 13,952,680 Fixed Rate per
MGD:
$33,295 $2,112 $11,410
Variable Rate
per MGD:
$1,845 $122 $0
Treatment System Conveyance System General & Administrative WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Capacity, Rates, and Contributions
Fixed and Variable
Attachment 2Attachment 2

Page 599 of 695 ends

Fixed Rates:

Based on Million Gallons Per Day (MGD) per Month FY 2026-2027 FY 2025-2026 Total Fixed Expenses
Capacity
$5,593,595
14 MGD
$202,721
8 MGD
$1,916,864
14 MGD
Variable Rates:

Based on Million Gallons Day (MGD) of Estimated Flows per Day Total Variable Expenses
Estimated Flows
$6,061,600
9 MGD
$177,900

3.98 MGD
/365 = Variable Rate
Treatment System /365 = $1,845 $1,687
Conveyance System /365 = $122 $108
Variable Rate
Treatment System /12 = $33,295 $31,505
Conveyance System /12 = $2,112 $2,080
General and Administrative /12 = $11,410 $11,342
WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Rate Calculation
/12 = Fixed Rate Fixed Rate
Attachment 3Attachment 3

Page 600 of 695 ends

2025-2026 2026-2027
Budget Budget Amount % Change
Treatment System
Treatment Plant
Labor Costs 3,678,080 3,962,107 284,027 7.72%
Outside Services (Laboratory) 197,451 205,350 4.00% 7,899 Facility Maintenance 1,828,065 1,670,454 (157,611) -8.62% Vehicles/Equipment Rental 183,904 198,105 14,201 7.72%
Utilities 2,000,000 2,200,000 200,000 10.00%
Chemicals 2,094,551 2,349,000 254,449 12.15%
Solids Disposal/Sludge 425,071 494,074 16.23% 69,003
Permits and Fees 160,474 166,893 4.00% 6,419
Facility Maintenance - Bldg & Yard 92,306 157,110 70.21% 64,804 General Supplies 176,249 183,299 4.00% 7,050
Total Treatment Plant 10,836,151 11,586,392 750,241 6.92% Pre-treatment
Labor Costs 57,686 59,523 3.18% 1,837
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 2,884 2,976 3.19% 92
Laboratory - Quality Testing 5,062 5,264 3.99% 202
Supplies 1,000 1,040 4.00% 40
Total Pre-treatment 66,632 68,803 2,171 3.26%
Total Treatment System 10,902,783 11,655,195 752,412 6.90% Conveyance System
Labor Costs 145,870 146,787 0.63% 917
Facility Maintenance 82,747 86,056 4.00% 3,309
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 7,294 7,585 3.99% 291
Utilities 113,156 124,472 10.00% 11,316
Facility Maintenance - Bldg & Yard 5,117 5,321 3.99% 204 Supplies 10,000 10,400 4.00% 400
Total Conveyance System 364,184 380,621 16,437 4.51%
General and Administration
Labor 640,423 602,824 (37,599) -5.87%
Outside Services (Consulting) 568,736 703,857 135,121 23.76% Insurance Expense 512,935 409,059 (103,876) -20.25%
Audit Expense 21,500 22,095 2.77% 595
Mercury Monitoring - SARDA 9,000 9,359 3.99% 359
Basin Monitoring Program 30,234 31,443 4.00% 1,209
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 32,021 30,141 -5.87% (1,880)
Bank Charges 5,540 5,000 -9.75% (540)
Permits and Fees 18,500 19,240 4.00% 740
Data Communications - 5,000 5,000
General Supplies 12,438 12,936 4.00% 498
Legal Costs - General 54,200 65,910 21.61% 11,710
Total General and Administration 1,905,527 1,916,864 11,337 0.59% Total Operating Expenses 13,172,494 13,952,680 780,186 5.92% WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Year-to-Year Comparison
Change
Attachment 4

Page 601 of 695 ends

Total Costs Fixed Costs Variable Costs
Treatment System
Treatment Plant
Labor 3,962,107 3,962,107 -
Laboratory 205,350 205,350 -
Facility Maintenance 1,670,454 835,227 835,227
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 198,105 198,105 -
Utilities 2,200,000 - 2,200,000
Chemicals 2,349,000 - 2,349,000
Solids Disposal/Sludge 494,074 - 494,074
Permits and Fees 166,893 166,893 -
Facility Maintenance - Bldg & Yard 157,110 157,110 -
Supplies 183,299 - 183,299
Subtotal Treatment Plant 11,586,392 5,524,792 6,061,600 Pre-treatment 68,803 68,803 -
Total Treatment Operations 11,655,195 5,593,595 6,061,600 Conveyance System
Labor 146,787 146,787 -
Facility Maintenance 86,056 43,028 43,028
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 7,585 7,585 -
Utilities 124,472 - 124,472
Facility Maintenance - Bldg & Yard 5,321 5,321 -
Supplies 10,400 - 10,400
Total Conveyance System 380,621 202,721 177,900
General and Administrative 1,916,864 1,916,864 -
Total Operating Budget used for Rate Calculation 13,952,680 7,713,180 6,239,500 Fixed and Variable Rates per MGD Fixed Per MGD Variable Per Month Per MG
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Rates
Treatment 33,295 1,845
Conveyance 2,112 122
General and Administration 11,410
Total 46,817 1,967
Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Rates
Treatment 31,505 1,687
Conveyance 2,080 108
General and Administration 11,342
Total 44,927 1,795
Amount of Increase/(Decrease) from 2024-2025 Rates
Treatment 1,790 158
Conveyance 32 14
General and Administration 68
Total Increase/(Decrease) 1,890 172
Percent Increase/(Decrease) 4.2% 9.6%
WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Fixed & Variable Cost Allocation
Attachment 5Attachment 5

Page 602 of 695 ends

Beginning Outstanding
SRF Loan Due Date
Member
Agency
Allocation
Percentage
Balance
7-01-2026 Interest Principal Payment
Balance
6-30-2027
Plant Expansion 12/31/2026 Corona 42.420% $ 20,251,034 $ 384,770 $ 1,518,419 $ 1,903,189 $ 18,732,615 HGSD 1.580% 754,283 14,331 56,556 70,887 697,727
JCSD 46.020% 21,969,650 417,423 1,647,281 2,064,704 20,322,369 Norco 9.100% 4,344,281 82,541 325,734 408,275 4,018,547 Western 0.880% 420,106 7,982 31,499 39,481 388,607
100.000% $ 47,739,354 $ 907,047 $ 3,579,489 $ 4,486,536 $ 44,159,865 SRF Loan maturity date: 12/31/2036
WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Debt Service Expenditures
Debt Service
Attachment 6Attachment 6

Page 603 of 695 ends

Description
Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects Total Corona HGSD JCSD Norco Western Treatment System
Blower Replacement & Building Modifications 1,171,000 219,141 62,730 501,856 225,839 161,434 Medium Voltage Switchgear 2,948,000 551,689 157,924 1,263,425 568,551 406,411 Dewatering Replacement 3,978,000 744,443 213,101 1,704,852 767,197 548,407 Generator Replacement 1,320,000 247,025 70,712 565,713 254,575 181,975 Primary Clarifier No. 2 Rehabilitation 1,720,775 322,026 92,182 737,472 331,869 237,226 Warehouse/Storage Building 500,000 93,570 26,785 214,285 96,430 68,930 Total Treatment System 11,637,775 2,177,894 623,434 4,987,603 2,244,461 1,604,383 Conveyance System
WRCRWA Conveyance System Condition Assessment 550,000 180,124 51,563 - 171,875 146,438 Total Conveyance System 550,000 180,124 51,563 - 171,875 146,438 Total Pay-go Capital Improvement Project Contribution 12,187,775 2,358,018 674,997 4,987,603 2,416,336 1,750,821 Asset Replacement Reserve Funding Total Corona HGSD JCSD Norco WMWD Treatment System 1,259,215 235,649 67,456 539,663 242,852 173,595 Conveyance System 373,642 122,368 35,029 - 116,763 99,482 Total Asset Replacement Reserve Contribution 1,632,857 358,017 102,485 539,663 359,615 273,077 Total Capital Contributions $ 13,820,632 $ 2,716,035 $ 777,482 $ 5,527,266 $ 2,775,951 $ 2,023,898 WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Capital Budget
Agency Amounts to be Contributed
Attachment 7Attachment 7

Page 604 of 695 ends

WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Introduction
The WRCRWA Administrator is recommending approval and implementation of the following pay-go capital improvement projects for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.

1. Blower Replacement and Blower Building Air Intake/Ventilation Modifications

2. Medium Voltage Switchgear

3. Dewatering Replacement

4. Generator Replacement

5. Primary Clarifier No. 2 Rehabilitation

6. Warehouse/Storage Building

7. WRCRWA Conveyance System Condition Assessment
The capital projects are critical to the successful operation of the WRCRWA Wastewater Treatment Plant. The projects are described on the following pages.

Attachment 8

Page 605 of 695 ends

WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 1: Blower Replacement and Air Intake/Ventilation Modifications Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $2,171,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $871,000
Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $300,000

Summary
Replace three turbo blowers associated with the activated sludge process and address any conditions within the existing blower building that negatively impact the operation of the blowers (heat/dust).

Justification
Over the past few years, WRCRWA has experienced failures of the existing HIS Turbo Blowers.

During the most recent failure we were made aware that HSI equipment is no longer supported, and replacement parts are non-existent. Additionally, the blowers have suffered failures associated with dust and heat within the blower room.

Background
WRCRWA is currently equipped with five turbo blowers that support the aerobic biological process. These five blowers vary in age and manufacturer. In 2012 (or so), WRCRWA supplemented its aeration capacity within the oxidation ditch by adding diffuser grids and three turbo blowers. Those original three turbo blowers were manufactured by Houston Service Industries (HSI). HSI was subsequently purchased by Atlas Copco. During the 2017 plant expansion and addition of another biological reactor, two more turbo blowers were installed.

These two “newer” turbo blowers were manufactured by APG-Neuros.

Over the past few years, WRCRWA has experienced failures of the HSI blowers (typically related to the air bearings and dust). In 2023, HSI blower #2 experienced an electrical component failure and subsequent mechanical failure. Through this failure and attempted repair, Atlas Copco has notified WRCRWA that the HSI product line is no longer supported and that replacement parts are non-existent. Atlas Copco manufactures a similar product and as they replace existing HSI blowers, those used units and being scavenged for parts to make repairs on other HSI blowers.

WRCRWA is now faced with needing to replace the three HSI blowers (before failure) to ensure availability of adequate air in support of the biological processes. It is in WRCRWA’s best interest to investigate all blower technologies to ensure integration with the remaining two APG-Neuros blowers along with efficiency and ultimate biological air demands.

Additionally, climate conditions within the blower room will be addressed to minimize heat buildup and reduce dust intrusion into the space thus improving the operability of critical equipment.

During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $300,000.

Page 606 of 695 ends

WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Schedule
WRCRWA awarded a design contract to N2W for the replacement blowers and air handling modifications. WRCRWA has pre-purchased replacement blowers from APG Nueros and expects delivery in late FY 2026. Construction should begin in late FY 2026 and carry over into FY 2027.

Page 607 of 695 ends

WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 2: Medium Voltage Switchgear
Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $3,178,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $0
Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $2,948,000

Summary
Replace the medium voltage switchgear and place it in the existing electrical building.

Justification
The existing outdoor medium voltage switchgear is 26 years old and is becoming obsolete. It is due for replacement and should be relocated inside the newly built Electrical Building to provide a better environment conducive to such equipment.

Background
Due to the age of the gear and it being installed outdoors, it is recommended that this equipment be replaced to ensure it can be maintained and operated properly in the foreseeable future. A new electrical building has been constructed and the low voltage switchgear was moved into this building. There is room for a new medium voltage switchgear to be installed in this building also.

Depending on the outcome of the blower investigation, dewatering replacement study and low voltage load study, the medium voltage system might be impacted. The request would be for $190,000 during FY 2025 with replacement being in FY 2027. Design is anticipated to be complete during FY 2026.

During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $2,948,000.

Schedule
The design of replacement medium voltage switchgear is anticipated to begin in the summer with construction taking place in FY 2027.

Page 608 of 695 ends

WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 3: Dewatering Equipment Replacement Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $4,378,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $2,978,000 Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $1,000,000

Summary
Replace the three existing Andritz centrifuges.

Justification
Dewatering sludge is a critical component of biosolids management. Over the past few years, the Centrifuges at WRCRWA have experienced numerous failures resulting in decreased operating cycles. Limited dewatering capacity jeopardizes the treatment plant’s ability to maintain regulatory compliance.

Background
During the later stages of the plant expansion design, it was surfaced that the original centrifuges were outdated and no longer serviceable. The design team sought replacement equipment that would meet the needs of the facility while also fitting within the existing footprint of the original equipment. Andritz centrifuges were selected and installed during the plant expansion.

While the existing Andritz centrifuges have met the needs of the facility, they are being pushed to their limits. The centrifuges are being ran at the far end of their speed rating to achieve decent % solids concentration while maintaining desirable centrate quality. The units are being stressed resulting in reduced component life and increasingly severe failures.

With the units suffering a higher rate of mechanical breakdown, very rarely do we have three units available. This has resulted in increased run times for the other two units available. An investigation of best available technologies and based on current WRCRWA sludge conditions, staff recommend replacing the existing centrifuges to gain greater operational redundancy and productivity.

During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $1,000,000.

Schedule
A design contract was awarded to N2W to analyze dewatering options for WRCRWA. Staff are currently working through the technical evaluation of dewatering options with anticipated design wrapping up in FY 2026. Construction should begin in FY 2027 and likely carry over into FY 2028.

Page 609 of 695 ends

WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 4: Emergency Generator Replacement
Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $2,740,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $1,320,000 Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $0

Summary
Replace the existing treatment plant emergency generator.

Justification
Generator age as well as various component failures over the 26-year period help drive the need for asset replacement consideration.

Background
WRCRWA is equipped with an emergency stand-by generator to provide power to the plant processes should the need arise. The existing Caterpillar brand stand-by plant generator houses a TIER 2 engine that is 26 years old. PSP, weather, accidental and routine power outages have been a recurring theme at the WRCRWA plant. This uncertainty coupled with asset depreciation accompanies a level of risk for our stand-by power reliance. Generator age as well as various component failures over the 26-year period help drive the need for asset replacement consideration. From a risk and resilience perspective, this unit presents a higher potential for failure. Additionally, the emissions rating is very low when compared to the SCAQMD best available technology today (TIER 4F engines).

Schedule
An electrical load study has been completed, and verification of existing and future electrical loads are understood. We are currently pausing this project while pursuing a grant application to offset costs. Once the grant opportunity is confirmed, design of the replacement will proceed.

Page 610 of 695 ends

WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 5: Primary Clarifier No. 2 Rehabilitation Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $2,220,775
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $1,720,775 Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $0

Summary
Rehabilitate Primary Clarifier No. 2
Justification
Primary clarifier removes the lighter materials that float to the top such as fats, oil and grease (FOG) as well as heavier materials that sink to the bottom (sludge). FOG and the sludge collected from the primary clarifier are conveyed to the anaerobic digesters for additional stabilization. A primary clarifier is considered the most energy efficient way to remove the biochemical oxygen demand of the wastewater, lessening the energy load on downstream processes such as bioreactors and blower systems. Maintaining the primary clarifiers in well-functioning order would reduce the overall energy footprint of the plant as well as increase the likelihood of maintaining NPDES and AQMD permit compliance.

Background
Primary Clarifier No. 2 is one of two 95-feet diameter primary clarifiers that were constructed in 2017 and has been in service for 8 years. During a routine preventative maintenance inspection after cleaning, the staff discovered a substantial level of corrosion on the sludge collection arms, scum baffle and center supporting ring. A consultant was hired to document the existing condition and to validate staff observations. Staff, along with the consultant, recommend rehabilitating Primary Clarifier No. 2 which consists of repairing/replacing corroded structural members of the sludge collection system, center ring, and scum baffle along with sandblasting and recoating all steel elements.

Schedule
Albert A. Webb and Associates has been awarded a contract engineering support for the rehabilitation of Primary Clarifier #2. WRCRWA has awarded a purchase order to WesTech to provide for the purchase of a new clarifier drive assembly. We anticipate construction kicking off in late FY 2026 and carrying over into FY 2027.

Page 611 of 695 ends

WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 6: Warehouse/Storage Building
Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $2,535,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $0
Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $500,000

Summary
Construct a Maintenance shop/Warehouse to support repair of plant equipment and storage of spare parts necessary to keep the treatment plant operational.

Justification
The addition of a maintenance shop/warehouse building will provide ample space on site for performing maintenance and repairs of equipment at the existing plant site along with protected storage of spare parts. Currently there is a relatively small area attached to the Administration Building that provides some space for parts storage and maintenance of equipment. The space is not large enough for either storage or maintenance activities. A dedicated facility is required to provide sufficient area for both of these functions.

Background
Originally, the WRCRWA treatment plant was built with a small maintenance shop/storage area at the back of the administration building. This space was envisioned to support the original facility. Over time, the facility has grown both in size (expanded from 8.0 MGD to 14.0 MGD) while also growing in complexity. WRCRWA has also noticed changes in availability of spare parts needed to support the maintenance and repair of equipment critical to the treatment plant’s operation. This has driven a significant investment by WRCRWA in spare parts.

WRCRWA has outgrown the original space provided for maintenance and storage. Staff have been utilizing all available indoor space throughout the facility for storage as well as brought in several storage containers to help house spare parts and allowing the original space to be used for maintenance activities.

During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $500,000.

Schedule
The project is planned to kick off in July 2026. This initial phase would cover design and site conditions with construction anticipated the following year.

Page 612 of 695 ends

WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 7: WRCRWA Conveyance System Condition Assessment Allocation: Conveyance
Estimated Total Cost: $650,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $100,000
Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $450,000

Summary
WRCRWA, under the administrative authority of Western Municipal Water District (WMWD), is requesting a field condition assessment of the WRCRWA wastewater treatment sewer conveyance system pipeline segments and manholes from the Arizona flume to the South Regional Pump Station notwithstanding any related siphons or force mains.

Justification
To protect system operations, maintain regulatory compliance related to the Sewer System Management Plan, and to ensure that WRCRWA is capable of forecasting asset failures as well as establishing appropriate asset replacement reserves, WRCRWA will evaluate, and as well as grade, based on field evaluation, the existing asset condition for 6.8 miles of shared sewage trunk line segments and manholes.

Background
As part of the linear asset management program, condition assessments are required to meet compliance requirements, understand current needs and prepare for future costs. This conveyance system has never had formal condition assessment. This bassline information will provide member agencies with a clear understanding of the maintenance needs.

During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $450,000.

Schedule
This project was published on Planet Bids with only one firm proposing. Staff are currently working out details and will come back to the WRCRWA Board for award of contract. We anticipate the condition assessment start in late FY 2026.

Page 613 of 695 ends

WRCRWA
Asset Replacement Funding Need Analysis for FY 2026-2027 Budget Adopted Proposed Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2030-2031 2031-2032 2032-2033 2033-2034 2034-2035 2035-2036 Reserve Bal as of 7/1/25 1,521,885 1,581,407 1,005,672 595,546 446,813 339,815 263,407 169,530 67,350 25,107 (34,885) Smoothed Contribution
Requirement 345,383 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 Funding Needs (285,861) (949,377) (783,768) (522,375) (480,640) (450,050) (467,519) (475,822) (415,885) (433,634) (338,345) Projected Reserve $ 1,581,407 $ 1,005,672 $ 595,546 $ 446,813 $ 339,815 $ 263,407 $ 169,530 $ 67,350 $ 25,107 $ (34,885) $ 412 Adopted Proposed Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2030-2031 2031-2032 2032-2033 2033-2034 2034-2035 2035-2036 Reserve Bal as of 7/1/25 4,073,165 4,539,286 2,054,393 1,034,615 430,890 (108,847) (370,042) (471,923) (291,836) (97,600) 61,087 Smoothed Contribution
Requirement 1,160,597 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 Funding Needs (694,476) (3,744,108) (2,278,993) (1,862,940) (1,798,952) (1,520,410) (1,361,096) (1,079,128) (1,064,979) (1,100,528) (1,070,018) Projected Reserve $ 4,539,286 $ 2,054,393 $ 1,034,615 $ 430,890 $ (108,847) $ (370,042) $ (471,923) $ (291,836) $ (97,600) $ 61,087 $ 250,284 Projected Cash Availability $ 6,120,693 $ 3,060,065 $ 1,630,161 $ 877,703 $ 230,968 $ (106,635) $ (302,393) $ (224,486) $ (72,493) $ 26,202 $ 250,696 Capacity in MGD % Allocation $ Allocation Capacity in MGD % Allocation $ Allocation WMWD 2.13 26.625% $ 99,482 WMWD 1.93 13.786% $ 173,595
JCSD 0 0.000% $ - JCSD 6 42.857% $ 539,663
Norco 2.5 31.250% $ 116,763 Norco 2.7 19.286% $ 242,852 HGSD 0.75 9.375% $ 35,029 HGSD 0.75 5.357% $ 67,456
Corona 2.62 32.750% $ 122,368 Corona 2.62 18.714% $ 235,649 Total 8 100.00% $ 373,642 Total 14 100.00% $ 1,259,215 $ 1,632,857 Treatment System
Conveyance System
FY 2026-2027 Annual Funding Projection by Member Agency $ 273,077
$ 539,663
$ 359,615
$ 102,485
$ 358,017
Conveyance Treatment Total Asset Replacement
Member Contribution
Attachment 9

Page 614 of 695 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 WESTERN

RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER AUTHORITY

BUDGET, ESTABLISHING RATES TO BE CHARGED FOR

CONVEYANCE, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTEWATER,

LOCATED IN NORCO, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority ("WRCRWA") owns and operates a wastewater conveyance, treatment and disposal system; and
WHEREAS, the agencies having the right to discharge to the WRCRWA treatment facility and collection system are the Member Agencies: the Home Gardens Sanitary District, the Jurupa Community Services District, Western Municipal Water District, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, the City of Corona and the City of Norco; and
WHEREAS, the City of Norco owns and operates a public sanitary sewer collection system that discharges directly to the WRCRWA treatment facility; and WHEREAS, the City of Norco currently owns 2.7 million gallons per day of wastewater treatment capacity and 2.5 million gallons per day of conveyance capacity; and
WHEREAS, the City of Norco and each member agency is required pursuant to Section 6.A. of the Joint Exercise of Powers to approve the annual budget establishing rates.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA, to adopt the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
__________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco

Page 615 of 695 ends

Resolution No. 2026-25

Page 2 ends

May 20, 2026
ATTEST:
________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026 by the following vote of the City Council:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California on May 20, 2026.
___________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California

Page 616 of 695 ends

City Council

STAFF REPORT
Date: May 20, 2026 Agenda Item:

To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Sam Nelson, Public Works Director
Prepared By: Sam Nelson, Public Works Director
Department: Public Works
SUBJECT:

Ratification of Fiscal Year 2026-27 Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority Budget
RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt Resolution 2026-25, approving the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority Budget, establishing rates to be charged for conveyance, treatment and disposal of wastewater.

SUMMARY:

The City of Norco is a member agency of the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority (WRCRWA). Each member agency is required to present the adopted fiscal year budget document to their governing body for ratification. The budget details are attached for review and is appropriate for the City Council to ratify the document.

BACKGROUND:

Attached is a copy of the WRCRWA Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating and Capital Improvements Budget, establishing rates and charges effective July 1, 2026. The Budget document was approved by the WRCRWA Board at their April 16, 2026 meeting (See FY 2026-27 WRCRWA Budget).

The budget data was first reviewed by the Executive Committee with an unanimous recommendation for approval by the Board of Directors. In the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget, Member Agency contributions will increase in aggregate by $4,194,288 or 14.9%. The Operating Budget will increase by $780,186, or 5.9%; the Debt Service Budget remains the same, and the Capital Budget will increase by $3,414,102, or 32.8% mainly due to unspent budget carried over. Specifically for Norco, the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Operating Budget will increase by $168,171, or 6.5%; the Debt Service Budget will remain unchanged in the amount of $408,275, and the Capital Budget will increase by $678,095 or 32.3%.

Page 617 of 695 ends

Compared to Fiscal Year 2025-26 rates, the fixed charge component per million gallons a day treated (MGD) per month is increasing $1,733 from $44,927 to $46,660 or 3.8% and the variable charge per million gallons is increasing $172 from $1,795 to $1,967 or

9.6%. This data is described in more detail in the FY 2026-27 WRCRWA budget document. The budget document describes the wastewater treatment capacity and conveyance system costs as well as the member agency bond debt and Capital Improvement responsibilities. The City of Norco will contribute $2,775,951 to the Capital Improvement component during Fiscal Year 2026-27 if the proposed projects are constructed.

Upon the Council's favorable consideration and approval of the WRCRWA Fiscal Year 2026-27 budget, staff will provide the Authority with a copy of the Resolution and a minute excerpt of Council's action to satisfy the ratification requirement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

City staff has included the cost for treatment and collection as well as outstanding debt service requirements in the City's Fiscal Year 2026-27 Sewer Operations Budget.

Capital Improvements outlined in the WRCRWA budget have also been included in the City's Fiscal Year 2026-27 Sewer Capital Improvement Fund Budget. For the City of Norco, the overall net change in the year to year budget will be an increases of $846,266 or 16.7%.

RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:

This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 5 - "Infrastructure and Asset Management"
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:

Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):

FY 2026-27 WRCRWA Budget
Resolution No. 2026-25

Page 618 of 695 ends
Page 619 of 695 ends
Page 620 of 695 ends
Page 621 of 695 ends
Page 622 of 695 ends
Page 623 of 695 ends
Page 624 of 695 ends
Page 625 of 695 ends
Page 626 of 695 ends

Expenditure Category Corona HGSD JCSD Norco Western Total Operations:

Treatment System $ 1,720,312 $ 683,558 $ 5,778,281 $ 2,223,734 $ 1,249,310 $ 11,655,195 Conveyance System 111,089 44,483 139,339 - 85,710 380,621 General & Administration 358,727 102,689 821,514 369,681 264,253 1,916,864 Total Operating Contributions $ 2,190,128 $ 830,730 $ 6,599,795 $ 2,732,754 $ 1,599,273 $ 13,952,680 Debt Service:

SRF Loan $ 1,903,189 $ 70,887 $ 2,064,704 $ 408,275 $ 39,481 $ 4,486,536 Capital:

Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects (1) $ 2,358,018 $ 674,997 $ 4,987,603 $ 2,416,336 $ 1,750,821 $ 12,187,775 Asset Replacement Reserve Funding 358,017 102,485 539,663 359,615 273,077 1,632,857 Total Capital Contributions $ 2,716,035 $ 777,482 $ 5,527,266 $ 2,775,951 $ 2,023,898 $ 13,820,632 Total Member Contributions $ 6,809,352 $ 1,679,099 $ 14,191,765 $ 5,916,980 $ 3,662,652 $ 32,259,848 Expenditure Category Corona HGSD JCSD Norco Western Total Operations:

Treatment System $ 1,667,901 $ 646,867 $ 5,310,410 $ 2,067,623 $ 1,209,982 $ 10,902,783 Conveyance System 108,788 41,997 129,466 - 83,933 364,184 General & Administration 356,606 102,082 816,655 367,494 262,690 1,905,527 Total Operating Contributions $ 2,133,295 $ 790,946 $ 6,127,065 $ 2,564,583 $ 1,556,605 $ 13,172,494 Debt Service:

SRF Loan $ 1,903,189 $ 70,887 $ 2,064,704 $ 408,275 $ 39,481 $ 4,486,536 Capital:

Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects (1) $ 1,723,758 $ 493,437 $ 3,637,081 $ 1,766,091 $ 1,280,183 $ 8,900,550 Asset Replacement Reserve Funding 330,307 94,553 497,397 331,765 251,958 1,505,980 Total Capital Contributions $ 2,054,065 $ 587,990 $ 4,134,478 $ 2,097,856 $ 1,532,141 $ 10,406,530 Total Member Contributions $ 6,090,549 $ 1,449,823 $ 12,326,247 $ 5,070,714 $ 3,128,227 $ 28,065,560 Total Member Contribution YTY Change $ 718,803 $ 229,276 $ 1,865,518 $ 846,266 $ 534,425 $ 4,194,288 % Changes 11.8% 15.8% 15.1% 16.7% 17.1% 14.9%
% Changes, excluding carried over CIP 1.6% 3.8% 3.0% 4.4% 2.7% 3.0% (1) $6,989,775 is proposed to carry over from FY 2025-2026 to FY 2026-2027; $3,522,500 is carried over from FY 2024-2025 to FY 2025-2026 Adopted Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Budget
WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Member Contribution Summary Year-to-Year Comparison
Proposed Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Attachment 1

Page 627 of 695 ends
← All documents from this meeting