Capacity Contribution Capacity Contribution Capacity Contribution Total by Agency Corona 2.62 $ 1,046,801 2.62 $ 66,391 2.62 $ 358,727 $ 1,471,919 HGSD 0.75 $ 299,657 0.75 $ 19,005 0.75 $ 102,689 $ 421,351 JCSD 6.00 $ 2,397,255 - $ - 6.00 $ 821,514 $ 3,218,769
Norco 2.70 $ 1,078,765 2.50 $ 63,351 2.70 $ 369,681 $ 1,511,797 WMWD 1.93 $ 771,117 2.13 $ 53,974 1.93 $ 264,253 $ 1,089,344 Total 14.00 $ 5,593,595 8.00 $ 202,721 14.00 $ 1,916,864 $ 7,713,180 Est. Flows Rate Est. Flows Rate Est. Flows Rate Total by Agency Corona 1.00 $ 673,511 1.00 $ 44,698 - $ - $ 718,209
HGSD 0.57 $ 383,901 0.57 $ 25,478 - $ - $ 409,379
JCSD 5.02 $ 3,381,026 - $ - - $ - $ 3,381,026
Norco 1.70 $ 1,144,969 1.70 $ 75,988 - $ - $ 1,220,957
WMWD 0.71 $ 478,193 0.71 $ 31,736 - $ - $ 509,929
Total 9.00 $ 6,061,600 3.98 $ 177,900 - $ - $ 6,239,500 Grand Totals $ 11,655,195 $ 380,621 $ 1,916,864 $ 13,952,680 Fixed Rate per
MGD:
$33,295 $2,112 $11,410
Variable Rate
per MGD:
$1,845 $122 $0
Treatment System Conveyance System General & Administrative WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Capacity, Rates, and Contributions
Fixed and Variable
Attachment 2Attachment 2
Fixed Rates:
Based on Million Gallons Per Day (MGD) per Month FY 2026-2027 FY 2025-2026 Total Fixed Expenses
Capacity
$5,593,595
14 MGD
$202,721
8 MGD
$1,916,864
14 MGD
Variable Rates:
Based on Million Gallons Day (MGD) of Estimated Flows per Day Total Variable Expenses
Estimated Flows
$6,061,600
9 MGD
$177,900
3.98 MGD
/365 = Variable Rate
Treatment System /365 = $1,845 $1,687
Conveyance System /365 = $122 $108
Variable Rate
Treatment System /12 = $33,295 $31,505
Conveyance System /12 = $2,112 $2,080
General and Administrative /12 = $11,410 $11,342
WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Rate Calculation
/12 = Fixed Rate Fixed Rate
Attachment 3Attachment 3
2025-2026 2026-2027
Budget Budget Amount % Change
Treatment System
Treatment Plant
Labor Costs 3,678,080 3,962,107 284,027 7.72%
Outside Services (Laboratory) 197,451 205,350 7,899 4.00% Facility Maintenance 1,828,065 1,670,454 (157,611) -8.62% Vehicles/Equipment Rental 183,904 198,105 14,201 7.72%
Utilities 2,000,000 2,200,000 200,000 10.00%
Chemicals 2,094,551 2,349,000 254,449 12.15%
Solids Disposal/Sludge 425,071 494,074 69,003 16.23%
Permits and Fees 160,474 166,893 6,419 4.00%
Facility Maintenance - Bldg & Yard 92,306 157,110 64,804 70.21% General Supplies 176,249 183,299 7,050 4.00%
Total Treatment Plant 10,836,151 11,586,392 750,241 6.92% Pre-treatment
Labor Costs 57,686 59,523 1,837 3.18%
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 2,884 2,976 92 3.19%
Laboratory - Quality Testing 5,062 5,264 202 3.99%
Supplies 1,000 1,040 40 4.00%
Total Pre-treatment 66,632 68,803 2,171 3.26%
Total Treatment System 10,902,783 11,655,195 752,412 6.90% Conveyance System
Labor Costs 145,870 146,787 917 0.63%
Facility Maintenance 82,747 86,056 3,309 4.00%
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 7,294 7,585 291 3.99%
Utilities 113,156 124,472 11,316 10.00%
Facility Maintenance - Bldg & Yard 5,117 5,321 204 3.99% Supplies 10,000 10,400 400 4.00%
Total Conveyance System 364,184 380,621 16,437 4.51%
General and Administration
Labor 640,423 602,824 (37,599) -5.87%
Outside Services (Consulting) 568,736 703,857 135,121 23.76% Insurance Expense 512,935 409,059 (103,876) -20.25%
Audit Expense 21,500 22,095 595 2.77%
Mercury Monitoring - SARDA 9,000 9,359 359 3.99%
Basin Monitoring Program 30,234 31,443 1,209 4.00%
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 32,021 30,141 (1,880) -5.87%
Bank Charges 5,540 5,000 (540) -9.75%
Permits and Fees 18,500 19,240 740 4.00%
Data Communications - 5,000 5,000
General Supplies 12,438 12,936 498 4.00%
Legal Costs - General 54,200 65,910 11,710 21.61%
Total General and Administration 1,905,527 1,916,864 11,337 0.59% Total Operating Expenses 13,172,494 13,952,680 780,186 5.92% WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Year-to-Year Comparison
Change
Attachment 4
Total Costs Fixed Costs Variable Costs
Treatment System
Treatment Plant
Labor 3,962,107 3,962,107 -
Laboratory 205,350 205,350 -
Facility Maintenance 1,670,454 835,227 835,227
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 198,105 198,105 -
Utilities 2,200,000 - 2,200,000
Chemicals 2,349,000 - 2,349,000
Solids Disposal/Sludge 494,074 - 494,074
Permits and Fees 166,893 166,893 -
Facility Maintenance - Bldg & Yard 157,110 157,110 -
Supplies 183,299 - 183,299
Subtotal Treatment Plant 11,586,392 5,524,792 6,061,600 Pre-treatment 68,803 68,803 -
Total Treatment Operations 11,655,195 5,593,595 6,061,600 Conveyance System
Labor 146,787 146,787 -
Facility Maintenance 86,056 43,028 43,028
Vehicle/Equipment Rental 7,585 7,585 -
Utilities 124,472 - 124,472
Facility Maintenance - Bldg & Yard 5,321 5,321 -
Supplies 10,400 - 10,400
Total Conveyance System 380,621 202,721 177,900
General and Administrative 1,916,864 1,916,864 -
Total Operating Budget used for Rate Calculation 13,952,680 7,713,180 6,239,500 Fixed and Variable Rates per MGD Fixed Per MGD Variable Per Month Per MG
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Rates
Treatment 33,295 1,845
Conveyance 2,112 122
General and Administration 11,410
Total 46,817 1,967
Fiscal Year 2025-2026 Rates
Treatment 31,505 1,687
Conveyance 2,080 108
General and Administration 11,342
Total 44,927 1,795
Amount of Increase/(Decrease) from 2024-2025 Rates
Treatment 1,790 158
Conveyance 32 14
General and Administration 68
Total Increase/(Decrease) 1,890 172
Percent Increase/(Decrease) 4.2% 9.6%
WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Fixed & Variable Cost Allocation
Attachment 5Attachment 5
Beginning Outstanding
SRF Loan Due Date
Member
Agency
Allocation
Percentage
Balance
7-01-2026 Interest Principal Payment
Balance
6-30-2027
Plant Expansion 12/31/2026 Corona 42.420% $ 20,251,034 $ 384,770 $ 1,518,419 $ 1,903,189 $ 18,732,615 HGSD 1.580% 754,283 14,331 56,556 70,887 697,727
JCSD 46.020% 21,969,650 417,423 1,647,281 2,064,704 20,322,369 Norco 9.100% 4,344,281 82,541 325,734 408,275 4,018,547 Western 0.880% 420,106 7,982 31,499 39,481 388,607
100.000% $ 47,739,354 $ 907,047 $ 3,579,489 $ 4,486,536 $ 44,159,865 SRF Loan maturity date: 12/31/2036
WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Debt Service Expenditures
Debt Service
Attachment 6Attachment 6
Description
Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects Total Corona HGSD JCSD Norco Western Treatment System
Blower Replacement & Building Modifications 1,171,000 219,141 62,730 501,856 225,839 161,434 Medium Voltage Switchgear 2,948,000 551,689 157,924 1,263,425 568,551 406,411 Dewatering Replacement 3,978,000 744,443 213,101 1,704,852 767,197 548,407 Generator Replacement 1,320,000 247,025 70,712 565,713 254,575 181,975 Primary Clarifier No. 2 Rehabilitation 1,720,775 322,026 92,182 737,472 331,869 237,226 Warehouse/Storage Building 500,000 93,570 26,785 214,285 96,430 68,930 Total Treatment System 11,637,775 2,177,894 623,434 4,987,603 2,244,461 1,604,383 Conveyance System
WRCRWA Conveyance System Condition Assessment 550,000 180,124 51,563 - 171,875 146,438 Total Conveyance System 550,000 180,124 51,563 - 171,875 146,438 Total Pay-go Capital Improvement Project Contribution 12,187,775 2,358,018 674,997 4,987,603 2,416,336 1,750,821 Asset Replacement Reserve Funding Total Corona HGSD JCSD Norco WMWD Treatment System 1,259,215 235,649 67,456 539,663 242,852 173,595 Conveyance System 373,642 122,368 35,029 - 116,763 99,482 Total Asset Replacement Reserve Contribution 1,632,857 358,017 102,485 539,663 359,615 273,077 Total Capital Contributions $ 13,820,632 $ 2,716,035 $ 777,482 $ 5,527,266 $ 2,775,951 $ 2,023,898 WRCRWA Budget Schedule
Fiscal Year 2026-2027
Capital Budget
Agency Amounts to be Contributed
Attachment 7Attachment 7
WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Introduction
The WRCRWA Administrator is recommending approval and implementation of the following pay-go capital improvement projects for Fiscal Year 2026-2027.
1. Blower Replacement and Blower Building Air Intake/Ventilation Modifications
2. Medium Voltage Switchgear
3. Dewatering Replacement
4. Generator Replacement
5. Primary Clarifier No. 2 Rehabilitation
6. Warehouse/Storage Building
7. WRCRWA Conveyance System Condition Assessment
The capital projects are critical to the successful operation of the WRCRWA Wastewater Treatment Plant. The projects are described on the following pages.
Attachment 8
WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 1: Blower Replacement and Air Intake/Ventilation Modifications Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $2,171,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $871,000
Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $300,000
Summary
Replace three turbo blowers associated with the activated sludge process and address any conditions within the existing blower building that negatively impact the operation of the blowers (heat/dust).
Justification
Over the past few years, WRCRWA has experienced failures of the existing HIS Turbo Blowers.
During the most recent failure we were made aware that HSI equipment is no longer supported, and replacement parts are non-existent. Additionally, the blowers have suffered failures associated with dust and heat within the blower room.
Background
WRCRWA is currently equipped with five turbo blowers that support the aerobic biological process. These five blowers vary in age and manufacturer. In 2012 (or so), WRCRWA supplemented its aeration capacity within the oxidation ditch by adding diffuser grids and three turbo blowers. Those original three turbo blowers were manufactured by Houston Service Industries (HSI). HSI was subsequently purchased by Atlas Copco. During the 2017 plant expansion and addition of another biological reactor, two more turbo blowers were installed.
These two “newer” turbo blowers were manufactured by APG-Neuros.
Over the past few years, WRCRWA has experienced failures of the HSI blowers (typically related to the air bearings and dust). In 2023, HSI blower #2 experienced an electrical component failure and subsequent mechanical failure. Through this failure and attempted repair, Atlas Copco has notified WRCRWA that the HSI product line is no longer supported and that replacement parts are non-existent. Atlas Copco manufactures a similar product and as they replace existing HSI blowers, those used units and being scavenged for parts to make repairs on other HSI blowers.
WRCRWA is now faced with needing to replace the three HSI blowers (before failure) to ensure availability of adequate air in support of the biological processes. It is in WRCRWA’s best interest to investigate all blower technologies to ensure integration with the remaining two APG-Neuros blowers along with efficiency and ultimate biological air demands.
Additionally, climate conditions within the blower room will be addressed to minimize heat buildup and reduce dust intrusion into the space thus improving the operability of critical equipment.
During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $300,000.
WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Schedule
WRCRWA awarded a design contract to N2W for the replacement blowers and air handling modifications. WRCRWA has pre-purchased replacement blowers from APG Nueros and expects delivery in late FY 2026. Construction should begin in late FY 2026 and carry over into FY 2027.
WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 2: Medium Voltage Switchgear
Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $3,178,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $0
Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $2,948,000
Summary
Replace the medium voltage switchgear and place it in the existing electrical building.
Justification
The existing outdoor medium voltage switchgear is 26 years old and is becoming obsolete. It is due for replacement and should be relocated inside the newly built Electrical Building to provide a better environment conducive to such equipment.
Background
Due to the age of the gear and it being installed outdoors, it is recommended that this equipment be replaced to ensure it can be maintained and operated properly in the foreseeable future. A new electrical building has been constructed and the low voltage switchgear was moved into this building. There is room for a new medium voltage switchgear to be installed in this building also.
Depending on the outcome of the blower investigation, dewatering replacement study and low voltage load study, the medium voltage system might be impacted. The request would be for $190,000 during FY 2025 with replacement being in FY 2027. Design is anticipated to be complete during FY 2026.
During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $2,948,000.
Schedule
The design of replacement medium voltage switchgear is anticipated to begin in the summer with construction taking place in FY 2027.
WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 3: Dewatering Equipment Replacement Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $4,378,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $2,978,000 Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $1,000,000
Summary
Replace the three existing Andritz centrifuges.
Justification
Dewatering sludge is a critical component of biosolids management. Over the past few years, the Centrifuges at WRCRWA have experienced numerous failures resulting in decreased operating cycles. Limited dewatering capacity jeopardizes the treatment plant’s ability to maintain regulatory compliance.
Background
During the later stages of the plant expansion design, it was surfaced that the original centrifuges were outdated and no longer serviceable. The design team sought replacement equipment that would meet the needs of the facility while also fitting within the existing footprint of the original equipment. Andritz centrifuges were selected and installed during the plant expansion.
While the existing Andritz centrifuges have met the needs of the facility, they are being pushed to their limits. The centrifuges are being ran at the far end of their speed rating to achieve decent % solids concentration while maintaining desirable centrate quality. The units are being stressed resulting in reduced component life and increasingly severe failures.
With the units suffering a higher rate of mechanical breakdown, very rarely do we have three units available. This has resulted in increased run times for the other two units available. An investigation of best available technologies and based on current WRCRWA sludge conditions, staff recommend replacing the existing centrifuges to gain greater operational redundancy and productivity.
During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $1,000,000.
Schedule
A design contract was awarded to N2W to analyze dewatering options for WRCRWA. Staff are currently working through the technical evaluation of dewatering options with anticipated design wrapping up in FY 2026. Construction should begin in FY 2027 and likely carry over into FY 2028.
WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 4: Emergency Generator Replacement
Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $2,740,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $1,320,000 Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $0
Summary
Replace the existing treatment plant emergency generator.
Justification
Generator age as well as various component failures over the 26-year period help drive the need for asset replacement consideration.
Background
WRCRWA is equipped with an emergency stand-by generator to provide power to the plant processes should the need arise. The existing Caterpillar brand stand-by plant generator houses a TIER 2 engine that is 26 years old. PSP, weather, accidental and routine power outages have been a recurring theme at the WRCRWA plant. This uncertainty coupled with asset depreciation accompanies a level of risk for our stand-by power reliance. Generator age as well as various component failures over the 26-year period help drive the need for asset replacement consideration. From a risk and resilience perspective, this unit presents a higher potential for failure. Additionally, the emissions rating is very low when compared to the SCAQMD best available technology today (TIER 4F engines).
Schedule
An electrical load study has been completed, and verification of existing and future electrical loads are understood. We are currently pausing this project while pursuing a grant application to offset costs. Once the grant opportunity is confirmed, design of the replacement will proceed.
WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 5: Primary Clarifier No. 2 Rehabilitation Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $2,220,775
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $1,720,775 Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $0
Summary
Rehabilitate Primary Clarifier No. 2
Justification
Primary clarifier removes the lighter materials that float to the top such as fats, oil and grease (FOG) as well as heavier materials that sink to the bottom (sludge). FOG and the sludge collected from the primary clarifier are conveyed to the anaerobic digesters for additional stabilization. A primary clarifier is considered the most energy efficient way to remove the biochemical oxygen demand of the wastewater, lessening the energy load on downstream processes such as bioreactors and blower systems. Maintaining the primary clarifiers in well-functioning order would reduce the overall energy footprint of the plant as well as increase the likelihood of maintaining NPDES and AQMD permit compliance.
Background
Primary Clarifier No. 2 is one of two 95-feet diameter primary clarifiers that were constructed in 2017 and has been in service for 8 years. During a routine preventative maintenance inspection after cleaning, the staff discovered a substantial level of corrosion on the sludge collection arms, scum baffle and center supporting ring. A consultant was hired to document the existing condition and to validate staff observations. Staff, along with the consultant, recommend rehabilitating Primary Clarifier No. 2 which consists of repairing/replacing corroded structural members of the sludge collection system, center ring, and scum baffle along with sandblasting and recoating all steel elements.
Schedule
Albert A. Webb and Associates has been awarded a contract engineering support for the rehabilitation of Primary Clarifier #2. WRCRWA has awarded a purchase order to WesTech to provide for the purchase of a new clarifier drive assembly. We anticipate construction kicking off in late FY 2026 and carrying over into FY 2027.
WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 6: Warehouse/Storage Building
Allocation: Treatment
Estimated Total Cost: $2,535,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $0
Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $500,000 Summary
Construct a Maintenance shop/Warehouse to support repair of plant equipment and storage of spare parts necessary to keep the treatment plant operational.
Justification
The addition of a maintenance shop/warehouse building will provide ample space on site for performing maintenance and repairs of equipment at the existing plant site along with protected storage of spare parts. Currently there is a relatively small area attached to the Administration Building that provides some space for parts storage and maintenance of equipment. The space is not large enough for either storage or maintenance activities. A dedicated facility is required to provide sufficient area for both of these functions.
Background
Originally, the WRCRWA treatment plant was built with a small maintenance shop/storage area at the back of the administration building. This space was envisioned to support the original facility. Over time, the facility has grown both in size (expanded from 8.0 MGD to 14.0 MGD) while also growing in complexity. WRCRWA has also noticed changes in availability of spare parts needed to support the maintenance and repair of equipment critical to the treatment plant’s operation. This has driven a significant investment by WRCRWA in spare parts.
WRCRWA has outgrown the original space provided for maintenance and storage. Staff have been utilizing all available indoor space throughout the facility for storage as well as brought in several storage containers to help house spare parts and allowing the original space to be used for maintenance activities.
During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $500,000.
Schedule
The project is planned to kick off in July 2026. This initial phase would cover design and site conditions with construction anticipated the following year.
WRCRWA Pay-go Capital Improvement Projects
Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget
Capital Project No. 7: WRCRWA Conveyance System Condition Assessment Allocation: Conveyance
Estimated Total Cost: $650,000
Budget Carryover from Fiscal Year 2025-2026: $100,000
Additional Budget Need in Fiscal Year 2026-2027: $450,000
Summary
WRCRWA, under the administrative authority of Western Municipal Water District (WMWD), is requesting a field condition assessment of the WRCRWA wastewater treatment sewer conveyance system pipeline segments and manholes from the Arizona flume to the South Regional Pump Station notwithstanding any related siphons or force mains.
Justification
To protect system operations, maintain regulatory compliance related to the Sewer System Management Plan, and to ensure that WRCRWA is capable of forecasting asset failures as well as establishing appropriate asset replacement reserves, WRCRWA will evaluate, and as well as grade, based on field evaluation, the existing asset condition for 6.8 miles of shared sewage trunk line segments and manholes.
Background
As part of the linear asset management program, condition assessments are required to meet compliance requirements, understand current needs and prepare for future costs. This conveyance system has never had formal condition assessment. This bassline information will provide member agencies with a clear understanding of the maintenance needs.
During Fiscal Year 2026-2027, the ask is for $450,000.
Schedule
This project was published on Planet Bids with only one firm proposing. Staff are currently working out details and will come back to the WRCRWA Board for award of contract. We anticipate the condition assessment start in late FY 2026.
WRCRWA
Asset Replacement Funding Need Analysis for FY 2026-2027 Budget Adopted Proposed Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2030-2031 2031-2032 2032-2033 2033-2034 2034-2035 2035-2036 Reserve Bal as of 7/1/25 1,521,885 1,581,407 1,005,672 595,546 446,813 339,815 263,407 169,530 67,350 25,107 (34,885) Smoothed Contribution
Requirement 345,383 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 373,642 Funding Needs (285,861) (949,377) (783,768) (522,375) (480,640) (450,050) (467,519) (475,822) (415,885) (433,634) (338,345) Projected Reserve $ 1,581,407 $ 1,005,672 $ 595,546 $ 446,813 $ 339,815 $ 263,407 $ 169,530 $ 67,350 $ 25,107 $ (34,885) $ 412 Adopted Proposed Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027-2028 2028-2029 2029-2030 2030-2031 2031-2032 2032-2033 2033-2034 2034-2035 2035-2036 Reserve Bal as of 7/1/25 4,073,165 4,539,286 2,054,393 1,034,615 430,890 (108,847) (370,042) (471,923) (291,836) (97,600) 61,087 Smoothed Contribution
Requirement 1,160,597 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 1,259,215 Funding Needs (694,476) (3,744,108) (2,278,993) (1,862,940) (1,798,952) (1,520,410) (1,361,096) (1,079,128) (1,064,979) (1,100,528) (1,070,018) Projected Reserve $ 4,539,286 $ 2,054,393 $ 1,034,615 $ 430,890 $ (108,847) $ (370,042) $ (471,923) $ (291,836) $ (97,600) $ 61,087 $ 250,284 Projected Cash Availability $ 6,120,693 $ 3,060,065 $ 1,630,161 $ 877,703 $ 230,968 $ (106,635) $ (302,393) $ (224,486) $ (72,493) $ 26,202 $ 250,696 Capacity in MGD % Allocation $ Allocation Capacity in MGD % Allocation $ Allocation WMWD 2.13 26.625% $ 99,482 WMWD 1.93 13.786% $ 173,595
JCSD 0 0.000% -$ JCSD 6 42.857% $ 539,663
Norco 2.5 31.250% $ 116,763 Norco 2.7 19.286% $ 242,852 HGSD 0.75 9.375% $ 35,029 HGSD 0.75 5.357% $ 67,456
Corona 2.62 32.750% $ 122,368 Corona 2.62 18.714% $ 235,649 Total 8 100.00% $ 373,642 Total 14 100.00% $ 1,259,215 $ 1,632,857 Treatment System
Conveyance System
FY 2026-2027 Annual Funding Projection by Member Agency $ 273,077
$ 539,663
$ 359,615
$ 102,485
$ 358,017
Conveyance Treatment Total Asset Replacement
Member Contribution
Attachment 9
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-25
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 WESTERN
RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER AUTHORITY
BUDGET, ESTABLISHING RATES TO BE CHARGED FOR
CONVEYANCE, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF WASTEWATER,
LOCATED IN NORCO, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority ("WRCRWA") owns and operates a wastewater conveyance, treatment and disposal system; and
WHEREAS, the agencies having the right to discharge to the WRCRWA treatment facility and collection system are the Member Agencies: the Home Gardens Sanitary District, the Jurupa Community Services District, Western Municipal Water District, the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority, the City of Corona and the City of Norco; and
WHEREAS, the City of Norco owns and operates a public sanitary sewer collection system that discharges directly to the WRCRWA treatment facility; and WHEREAS, the City of Norco currently owns 2.7 million gallons per day of wastewater treatment capacity and 2.5 million gallons per day of conveyance capacity; and
WHEREAS, the City of Norco and each member agency is required pursuant to Section 6.A. of the Joint Exercise of Powers to approve the annual budget establishing rates.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO, CALIFORNIA, to adopt the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Budget.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
__________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco
Resolution No. 2026-25
May 20, 2026
ATTEST:
________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026 by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California on May 20, 2026.
___________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
City Council
STAFF REPORT
Date: May 20, 2026 Agenda Item:
3.I.
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Kelli Anderson, Communications Manager
Department: Communications
SUBJECT:
Approval of Appropriation of Funds and Amendment to Consultant Retainer Agreement with Tripepi Smith & Associates for Communications Support Services RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Amendment No. 1 to Consultant Retainer Agreement with Tripepi Smith & Associates for Communications Support Services, and Adopt Resolution No. 2026-38 authorizing an appropriation of $25,000 to advance the City's Legislative Platform.
SUMMARY:
The City of Norco's 2026 Legislative Platform guides advocacy efforts grounded in its mission and Core Values. To support this work, the City previously contracted Tripepi Smith & Associates for communications support services, including messaging, content creation, media support, and stakeholder engagement. There is a need for additional support, therefore the Communications Division proposes increasing the contract from $75,000 to $100,000, requiring a $25,000 budget appropriation for Fiscal Year 2025-26 to continue these services.
BACKGROUND:
Each year, the City of Norco engages with State and Federal legislators and agencies on issues that affect local governance, municipal operations, and the overall quality of life for residents. To provide clear guidance for these efforts, the City Council adopted its 2026 Legislative Platform, which reflects the City’s mission and adopted Core Values while reinforcing local control as a fundamental principle of municipal authority.
On September 17, 2025, the City Council approved a Consultant Retainer Agreement with Tripepi Smith & Associates for communications support services to advance the City’s Legislative Platform (Attachment A). Tripepi Smith, a well-regarded public affairs and strategic communications firm, brings extensive experience working with local governments on complex initiatives. The firm is known for crafting compelling
messaging, producing creative content, and executing outreach strategies that align with municipal goals.
Through the approved agreement, Tripepi Smith supports the City by developing messaging and talking points; producing digital and print materials; offering videography and editing services; drafting op-eds and press releases; providing media relations support; managing dedicated project websites; and enhancing stakeholder and social media engagement. These efforts ensure that the City’s legislative positions are communicated clearly, consistently, and professionally, while also promoting transparency and public awareness.
The original not-to-exceed agreement amount was $75,000. The Communications Division is satisfied with the performance of Tripepi Smith and now desires to amend the agreement to increase the not-to-exceed amount by $25,000, bringing the total contract amount to $100,000. Because the amendment (Attachment B) is not included in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 Operating Budget, a budget appropriation of $25,000 is requested to continue communication support services (Attachment C).
FISCAL IMPACT:
This agenda item authorizes an amount not to exceed $25,000 for communications support services. Because funding for this project is not included in the adopted FY 2025-26 Budget, a budget amendment is required to increase appropriations in the Communications Division budget (121.707.34100). Sufficient General Fund balance is available to support this amendment without impacting existing programs or services.
RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:
This agenda item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 4, “Communication and Stakeholder Experience.”
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment A - Executed Tripepi Smith Agreement
Attachment B - Amendment No. 1 to Agreement with Tripepi Smith & Associates Attachment C - Resolution No. 2026-38
Single Source Communications
Tripepi Smith & Associates 17
Other Cost Information
Tripepi Smith has related service fees that may come up during our engagement that we want to tell you about.
Annual Increase
Tripepi Smith will increase the hourly rates and retainer fees for all resources by 5% or the national CPI index–whichever is higher–each year on the anniversary of the contract, starting on the first anniversary of any contract when the contract duration is longer than one year. Otherwise, new rates will be negotiated with each new contract.
Retainer Discount
When a client’s retainer exceeds $7,500 per month, they gain access to our reduced retainer rates.
Travel Costs
Travel costs must be pre-authorized and then will be reimbursed by the client for any requested travel to complete a requested scope of work. Travel costs may include airfare, lodging, car rentals and gas.
Additionally, when client work requires that we be onsite, we will invoice for a resource’s travel time at 50% of the resource’s hourly rate.
Equipment Costs
Tripepi Smith offers some services that require equipment, such as drone operations and video production. As such, in those cases, the following rates apply:
Half Day (Under 4 Hours) Full Day (4+ Hours)
Video $450 $650
Drone $550 – Flat Fee
Please note that A/V equipment fees are based on the amount and type of equipment required, with pricing tailored to the specifics of each event.
Music and Video Licensing
Sometimes the client will want Tripepi Smith to apply music or use stock imagery/video while producing video. In these cases, we will need to apply licensing fees of approximately $100 per song and $200 if we use stock video imagery. This will provide a license for the use of the music and video footage to Tripepi Smith and its clients.
Meltwater Fee
Tripepi Smith offers a standard Meltwater package at a flat rate of $545 per month. This package includes a newsletter digest (of any frequency), up to five queries, and a monthly dashboard. Custom Meltwater solutions are also available upon request.
Single Source Communications
Tripepi Smith & Associates 18
Website Hosting Fees
If website hosting services are required, Tripepi Smith will charge a $620 website hosting fee and a $30 Domain Registration and DNS service fee, unless otherwise specified in this proposal. Fees will be billed upon commencement of hosting services, and annually thereafter.
Service Fees
Tripepi Smith prefers that clients pay service providers directly to avoid unnecessary administrative costs. You should also know, however, that we have no economic interest in service providers, unless otherwise specified in this proposal.
If a client asks Tripepi Smith to pay for a service provider bill, we will apply a 10% agency fee to the reimbursement expense. Typical service fees include, but are not limited to: print, mailing, digital advertising, media placements, voiceovers, translations and closed captions.
Partner Access
Tripepi Smith has access to entities that may be relevant to our engagement. These partnerships allow Tripepi Smith to offer clients extra media reach or additional services at partner pricing.
Local Information Network of Knowledge (LINK): www.LocalInfoNetwork.com – A community forum for local government professionals in California to discover and share resources, policies, sample work products, best practices and more.
PublicCEO: www.PublicCEO.com – Digital news about public affairs, reaching over 17,500 California government executives through a daily podcast, job board, video podcast and more.
Civic Business Journal: www.CivicBusinessJournal.com – Digital interest stories on the people, companies and solutions that make local government in California more effective.
FlashVote: www.FlashVote.com – Statistically valid surveying that helps leaders make decisions. • Disclaimer: Tripepi Smith President Ryder Todd Smith is an investor in FlashVote.
Tripepi Smith Talent Solutions: www.TSTalentSolutions.com – A multifaceted recruitment consultancy service, combining local government access with communications to advance talent quests and build culture warriors.
Meltwater: www.TripepiSmith.com/Media-Intelligence – An enterprise-class, comprehensive media monitoring solution that is best combined with Tripepi Smith’s analytics team.
AMENDMENT NO. 1
CONSULTANT RETAINER AGREEMENT FOR
COMMUNICATION SUPPORT SERVICES
This FIRST AMENDMENT to AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 20th day of May, 2026, by and between the City of Norco (hereinafter “CITY”), a municipal corporation, and Tripepi Smith and Associates (hereinafter “CONSULTANT”), a California corporation.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, CITY and CONSULTANT have previously entered into that certain AGREEMENT dated September 17, 2025, for Communication Support Services; and WHEREAS, the original not to-exceed contract amount of the AGREEMENT was for an amount not to exceed Seventy-Five Thousand 00/100 Dollars ($75,000); and WHEREAS, the City is satisfied with the performance of the CONSULTANT and desires to increase the not-to-exceed amount by Twenty-Five Thousand 00/100 Dollars, for a total contract amount not-to-exceed One Hundred Thousand 00/100 Dollars ($100,000).
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto AGREE as follows:
1. The not-to-exceed contract amount is hereby increased by Twenty-Five Thousand 00/100 Dollars ($25,000), for a total contract amount not to exceed One Hundred Thousand 00/100 Dollars ($100,000).
2. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the AGREEMENT, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this FIRST AMENDMENT the date and year first above written.
ATTEST: CITY OF NORCO:
___________________________ ___________________________ City Clerk Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM: CONSULTANT:
___________________________ ___________________________ Harper & Burns LLC Ryder Smith, CEO
Attorneys for the City Tripepi Smith & Associates
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORCO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING APPROPRIATION OF
FUNDS FROM GENERAL FUND RESERVES IN THE AMOUNT OF
$25,000 FOR COMMUNICATION SUPPORT SERVICES.
WHEREAS, the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 annual Operating Budget for the City of Norco, California was adopted by the City Council on June 18, 2025; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds are available in the General Fund to fund the appropriation; and
WHEREAS, approval of the appropriation of funds in the amount of $25,000 is for Communication Support Services; and
WHEREAS, any unused funds will remain in Communications Division Account No. 121.707.34100.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Norco, California, approve the appropriation in the amount of $25,000 from the General Fund Reserves for Communication Support Services.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
___________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
__________________________
City Clerk
City of Norco, California
Resolution No. 2026-38 – Appropriation of Funds from General Fund Reserves in the Amount of $25,000 for Communication Support Services
May 20, 2026
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on May 20, 2026. ________________________
City Clerk
City of Norco, California
City Council
STAFF REPORT
Date: May 20, 2026 Agenda Item:
3.J.
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Prepared By: Amanda Hamilton, Deputy City Manager /
Community Operations Director
Department: Community Operations
SUBJECT:
Accept Proposal and Award Approval of Surveillance System Upgrade at City Hall and Norco Sheriff’s Substation (Project No: 54303.12)
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept proposal and award contract to SHI International Corporation (through OMNIA Partners Contract No. 2024056) in the amount of $87,650, with authorization for the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10% of the original contract amount for the Surveillance System Upgrade at City Hall and the Norco Sheriff’s Substation.
SUMMARY:
The Surveillance System Upgrade for City Hall and the Norco Sheriff’s Substation modernizes and expands the City’s security infrastructure by replacing outdated equipment with a new surveillance system, including expanded camera coverage, updated technology, software licensing, and full installation services. The existing system has experienced reliability and performance issues and no longer meets operational needs. This upgrade will improve coverage, reliability, and long-term efficiency.
BACKGROUND:
To safeguard the integrity of the City’s security and camera surveillance systems, this staff report has been intentionally generalized. In accordance with established security protocols and to mitigate the risk of compromising the City's IT and security infrastructure, all information related to security software, system configurations, and related technologies will remain confidential and shall not be disclosed to the public.
Unauthorized disclosure of such sensitive details could expose the City to heightened security vulnerabilities and potential threats from malicious actors.
The Surveillance System Upgrade for City Hall and the Norco Sheriff’s Substation represents the next phase of a multi-phase initiative to modernize and enhance security infrastructure across City facilities. In prior phases, City Hall was equipped with a new security system, including updated interior camera coverage. This current phase builds upon that work by completing exterior camera coverage at City Hall and enhancing both interior and exterior surveillance at the Norco Sheriff’s Substation, thereby improving overall monitoring capabilities and facility security at both locations.
The proposed project includes the installation of a modern, high-definition surveillance system with expanded interior and exterior coverage at both facilities. The contract award amount is $87,650, with authorization for the City Manager to approve contract change orders up to 10% of the original contract amount for a total of $96,415. The scope of work includes the replacement and expansion of cameras and supporting infrastructure; deployment of multi-sensor and high-resolution devices; implementation of a five-year enterprise software licensing agreement; and installation, configuration, testing, commissioning, and system integration. All necessary materials and labor required to deliver a fully operational, system are included within the project scope.
The existing surveillance system has experienced ongoing operational deficiencies, including equipment failures, delayed maintenance response, inconsistent vendor support, and billing discrepancies. As a result, it no longer provides the level of reliability, coverage, or performance required to meet current public safety and facility security needs. This project is expected to improve long-term cost efficiency by reducing ongoing maintenance issues, service interruptions, and reactive repair costs associated with the existing system, while providing a more reliable and sustainable enterprise platform for ongoing security operations.
The contract with SHI, facilitated through Omnia Partners (Contract No. 2024056) under a cooperative purchasing agreement, is in compliance with the City’s procurement requirements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Security System Upgrade (Project No. 54303.12) was approved as a Capital Improvement Project (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2025–26. Available funding within the project account is sufficient to fully support the proposed surveillance system upgrades, totaling $96,415.
RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:
This item is consistent with Strategic Direction No. 5, "Infrastructure and Asset Management"
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney
City Council
STAFF REPORT
Date: May 20, 2026 Agenda Item:
3.K.
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Colby Cataldi, Community Development Director
Prepared By: Lacey David, Senior Community Development
Specialist
Department: Community Development
SUBJECT:
Recap of Actions Taken by the Planning Commission at its Meeting Held on May 13, 2026
RECOMMENDATION:
Receive and file the recap of actions taken by the Planning Commission at its meeting held on May 13, 2026.
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
ATTACHMENT(S):
Planning Commission - May 13 2026 - DRAFT Minutes
DRAFT - MINUTES
Planning Commission
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
City Council Chamber – Norco City Hall
2820 Clark Avenue, Norco, CA 92860
CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM
ROLL CALL Patricia Hedges, Chair
Jeff Shyu, Vice Chair
Shannon Chudzicki, Member
Dennis Hutnik, Member
ABSENT Member Cathy Fiore
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commission Member Hutnik
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
No public comments were made.
2. CONSENT CALENDAR
2.A. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for April 8, 2026 M/S SHYU/CHUDZICKI to approve the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of April 8, 2026. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: HEDGES, SHYU, CHUDZICKI, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: FIORE
ABSTAIN: NONE
4. DISCUSSION / ACTION ITEM(S)
4.A. CONTINUED ITEM: Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-15 (Juarez): A request to legalize an existing 1,542 square foot four-stall horse stable with storage and overhang located on 3341 Kips Korner Road, within the A-1-20 Zone APN 129-161-011.
Associate Planner Woods-Diaz presented the staff report on file.
Planning Commission Minutes - May 13, 2026
A letter of opposition was emailed to the Planning Commission and was presented to all members at the meeting.
Vice Chair Shyu asked if the conditions were provided to the applicant prior to the meeting and asked about the structure being reduced in size, staff provided an explanation.
Commission Member Hutnik noted that any code items are being handled by other departments, staff confirmed and explained the process.
Vice Chair Shyu and Chair Hedges agreed with Member Hutnik.
M/S SHYU/HUTNIK to approve Accessory Building Use Permit 2024-15 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval on Resolution 2026-14. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: HEDGES, SHYU, CHUDZICKI, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: FIORE
ABSTAIN: NONE
4.B. A request for a General Plan Consistency Determination for the Orange County Public Works Prado Dam Project (E01PD-27-014.1), Lower Norco Bluffs Maintenance Easement. The project is intended to facilitate the operation and maintenance of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Prado Dam Project (APN 130-090-002, 130-090-003, 130-090-005 & 130-060-006).
Associate Planner Wood-Diaz presented the staff report on file.
Attorney Brennan stated that the Planning Commission is to authorize and decide who is to sign the exhibit and recommended that Director Cataldi to be the person authorized to sign.
Vice Chair Shyu asked about fencing and access, Associate Planner WoodDiaz noted that the city does not own these parcels, no fencing or asphalt is planned for installation.
Director Cataldi explained the reason for this item and the process. Vice Chair Shyu has concerns that there is no public access, Director Cataldi explained the process for the current situation.
Member Hutnik questioned who maintains the easement, Director Catadli
Planning Commission Minutes - May 13, 2026
noted that Orange County Public Works. Attorney Brennan explained who is responsible for the easement, and explained the reason for this item being presented.
M/S SHYU/CHUDZICKI Planning Commission determined the easement is consistent with the General Plan and authorize Exhibit A for signature by the Community Development Director Cataldi. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: HEDGES, SHYU, CHUDZICKI, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: FIORE
ABSTAIN: NONE
4.C. Accessory Building Use Permit 2025-16 (Fransen): A request to allow a 4,800 square foot barn with twelve (12) horse stalls, a tack room, lounge area, and a medical supply area for horses located on 240 Sixth Street within the A-1-20 (Agricultural Low-Density) Zone (APN 133-210-071).
Associate Planner Woods-Diaz presented the staff report on file.
Vice Chair Shyu and Member Hutnik noted some typos in the resolution, staff made notations.
Chair Hedges questioned if adding a condition for the demolition of an existing structure was needed, staff explained that is at Planning Commission discretion.
Member Chudzicki asked if a condition could be added for the structure to be for animal keeping only, Attorney Brennan explained the process and there is no need for the added condition.
Chair Hedges requested the applicant address the Planning Commission.
Member Hutnik questioned the applicant if the site will be used for commercial use in the future, the applicant noted that no commercial use will be used at this site, it will be used for personal use and animal rescue use.
Member Chudzicki asked about the barns layout, the applicant explained the reason for the layout.
Vice Chair Shyu noted that if the applicant was to use the site for commercial use, the site would be cited by code.
Planning Commission Minutes - May 13, 2026
M/S SHYU/HUTNIK to approve Accessory Building Use Permit 2025-16 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval in Resolution 2026-16, with corrections to resolution and with the added condition for the demolition of the existing structure. The Motion was carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: HEDGES, SHYU, CHUDZICKI, AND HUTNIK
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: FIORE
ABSTAIN: NONE
6. COMMISSION / STAFF COMMUNICATIONS
Vice Chair Shyu asked about the status of the water meter on vacant land, Director Cataldi gave a detailed explaination.
7. ADJOURNMENT735
Chair Hedges adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m.
City Council
STAFF REPORT
Date: May 20, 2026 Agenda Item:
5.A.
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Bill Wilkman, Consultant
Department: Historic Preservation & Agricultural Heritage Commission
SUBJECT:
Proposed Demolition of Building 509 on the Naval Weapons Station, Norco Campus RECOMMENDATION:
Request Navy to:
1. Redraw the undertaking plans to contain all aspects of the propose use of Building 509 to the interior of the existing leaving the exterior of the building unaltered.
2. If Recommendation 1 is not feasible either:
a. Build a new building to accommodate the proposed building functions elsewhere on the Weapons Station campus, utilizing an architectural style and scale that is compatible with the other 500 series buildings on the campus, or
b. Build a building on another Navy property to accommodate the proposed building functions;
3. If Recommendation 1 or 2a are chosen, return the revised undertaking to the Historic Preservation and Agricultural Heritage Commission for its review and comments.
SUMMARY:
At its April 14 and May 13, 2026 meetings, the Historic Preservation and Agricultural Heritage Commission reviewed the Navy’s proposed undertaking to demolish Building 509 on the Naval Weapons Station, Norco campus and replace it with a new building built on the existing footprint of Building 509. The Commission was greatly concerned about the loss of a historic part of the Naval Weapons Station, Norco property and recommended alternatives to the proposed undertaking that would not affect the exterior of Building 509.
BACKGROUND:
The Navy’s main campus for its operations is located in the former hospital ward buildings (Unit 2) of Naval Hospital Corona. This complex is currently referred to as the “Inner Compound.” There are two Phases of Unit 2’s former ward buildings. Both phases are of Spanish Colonial Revival architecture; however, Phase 1’s buildings have clay tile roofs, while Phase 2’s buildings have composition shingle roofs. Phase 1’s buildings also have weeping mortar pilasters and columns, while Phase 2’s buildings have wooden pilasters and columns. Building 509 is in Phase 1 of the Unit 2 complex.
The Navy has asked the City to comment on its proposed undertaking as required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Section 106 requires federal agencies to consider the effects on historic properties that they carry out, assist, fund, permit, license or approve. Section 106 requires that federal agencies give interested parties an opportunity to comment on these undertakings. The federal agency is not required, however, to adhere to any recommendations issued by interested parties.
The Navy’s undertaking as contained in Attachment A calls for the complete demolition of Building 509 and its replacement with a new building constructed on the existing Building 509’s footprint. The proposed replacement for the existing Building 509 would be significantly higher than the existing building and have an architectural exterior that is unlike any other 500 series building in the Inner Compound.
The Historic Preservation and Agricultural Heritage Commission first considered the proposed demolition of Building 509 at its April 14, 2026 meeting. At that meeting, many concerns were expressed about the proposed undertaking. The Commission did not feel most of its concerns were adequately addressed by the Navy’s representative at that meeting and, therefore, decided that a Special Meeting should be held to better address its concerns. In the meantime, the Commission asked that Commissioners put their concerns in writing for consideration at the Special Meeting. Attachments B and C are comments from Commissioners Heasley and Letbetter.
The Special Meeting was held on May 13, 2026. At that meeting, the Commission expressed concerns about the scale and architecture of the proposed building.
Commissioners felt that the proposed use of Building should be confined within the existing building with no alterations to the exterior of the building. If that was not feasible, it felt that Building 509 should be left alone and that a new building should be built elsewhere on the Weapons Station campus, utilizing an architectural style compatible with the balance of the historic campus. And, if that was determined not to be feasible then the Navy should accommodate the proposed uses in a building outside of the Weapons Station campus. The Navy was not present at this meeting.
The City’s comments on the proposed undertaking are due on June 5, 2026.
Attachment D is a letter from the Mayor to the Navy expressing its comments and recommendations regarding the proposed undertaking. If needed, this letter can be altered as directed by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This agenda item will not result in a fiscal impact.
RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:
This agenda item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 5, "Infrastructure and Asset Management."
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
Attachment A - Building 509 Undertaking Letter
Attachment B - Building 509 Commissioner Heasley Feedback Attachment C - Building 509 Commissioner Letbetter Feedback Attachment D - Building 509 Request Letter
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION SEAL BEACH
800 SEAL BEACH BOULEVARD
SEAL BEACH, CA 90740-5000
IN REPLY REFER TO
5000-45B
Ser N45/020
April 7, 2026
Wilkman Historical Services
6779 Hawarden Dr.
Riverside, CA 92506
Dear Mr. Wilkman:
SUBJECT: DETACHMENT NORCO BUILDING 509 RENOVATION
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) as amended (54 USC 306108), and its implementing regulation outlined at 36 CFR Part 800, Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach (NWSSB) is initiating consultation for the subject undertaking at Detachment (DET) Norco. The proposed undertaking would involve the complete renovation of Building 509.
NAVWPNSTA Seal Beach is providing: a) a description of the proposed undertaking; b) a description of the area of potential effects (APE); c) the identification of historic properties; and d) the Navy’s finding of No Historic Properties Affected, consistent with 36 CFR Part 800.4(d)(1). A project location map is provided in enclosure (1). a. Description of the Undertaking
The proposed undertaking, pursuant to 36 CFR 800.16(y), would include a significant reconstruction of Building 509 to enable Information Technology (IT) personnel to successfully execute the operation, maintenance, and management of the information technology infrastructure and systems at DET Norco. The current facility does not meet current California seismic code. Therefore, the renovation would result in a substantial portion of the existing facility being demolished. The slab and portions of the foundation would remain. The proposed undertaking would reconstruct the building on the existing footprint of Building 509, with an exterior that is complementary to the adjacent structures in terms of forms, finishes, and materials. The renovation would be designed for adaptability and flexibility to configure the space for current and future missions. The renovation is intended to create a purpose-built IT facility with modern interiors and a compatible, contemporary exterior. The renovated facility will provide for computer labs, offices, and support spaces, as well as a direct physical connection to the adjacent Area Distribution Node (ADN) facility.
Building 509 is a single story, 13,511 square-foot facility originally constructed as a Navy medical facility in 1943. Its Spanish Revival style architecture with white stucco exterior and terra cotta colored clay tile roof are consistent with most facilities in the inner compound at DET Norco. During the 1950s, the facility was converted to a military ordnance testing facility.
Later, it transitioned into an IT center in the 1970s, and has remained in that function ever since.
Attachment A
5000-45B
Ser N45/020
April 7, 2026
2 The building is currently in use with limited sustainment investment since the 1990s. Many of the facility components are past or approaching their service life. Building 509 has had no significant renovations completed, with the exception of roof repairs, since it was converted to an IT center. Also, due to its age, the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system is poorly configured, and the restrooms and break areas are in substandard condition. The recent relocation of equipment formally housed in Building 509 created an opportunity to renovate and convert the vacated space into workstations for approximately 70 personnel. Current staff load in the facility is approximately 40 individuals with personnel inefficiently distributed throughout the facility.
The structure of the facility does not meet current seismic requirements. The fire system is past its life cycle. There are water infiltration issues in the porches that need to be addressed structurally and potentially through grading. Due to the original design that included open porches, the ceiling height in the porches (now enclosed) is extremely low for modern office purposes. This low ceiling height within the former porches does not allow for drop ceilings at a standard nine-foot height, which also inhibits upgrades to HVAC and lighting.
The renovation would provide for a combination of private offices, typical workstations, and lab space. Required repairs to the facility include but are not limited to: a) hazardous materials abatement for lead, asbestos, scat, and mold; b) replacement of all windows and doors with new windows and exterior doors that conform to Anti-Terrorism Force Protection (ATFP) standards; c) insulation of walls and ceiling; d) renovation of the restrooms, breakrooms, and support spaces; e) replacement of all finishes, including carpet, tile, and drop ceilings; f) replacement of exterior stucco; g) interior and exterior paint; h) providing new utilities and systems within the facility to the point of connection, including electrical, plumbing, telephone, and data infrastructure; i) conversion of the HVAC system to a high efficiency zoned system; j) modernizing the fire protection system; k) providing emergency lighting to meet current code requirements; and l) replacement of the clay tile roof.
The proposed undertaking would also include raising the roof structure to accommodate administrative functions of the former porches and make spaces more usable (e.g., HVAC, lighting, and insulation). The new minimum ceiling height would be nine feet. The project would provide high ceilings to allow deeper daylight penetration, and promote natural daylight into the workspace for overall occupant well-being.
The mechanical yard to the north of the facility is cluttered with small buildings, current equipment, obsolete equipment, and utility and network connections. This area ponds during rain events and traps water against the buildings. Site drainage is through surface flow and a concrete v-gutter to then north. The south and east sides are predominantly composed of concrete paving and flows to the east and south. The proposed undertaking would create a watertight environment for the entire facility by modifying the slab, and re-grading the areas surrounding Building 509 to eliminate water intrusion through the existing enclosed porches.
The proposed undertaking would also clean up and create a new consolidated mechanical yard that would provide Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) compliant screening for visual concealment.
5000-45B
Ser N45/020
April 7, 2026
3 The new mechanical yard would also consolidate utility connections to Building 509 (currently, there are multiple power connection points).
Existing turf and irrigation around the facility would be replaced with xeriscape landscape design and irrigation. The proposed undertaking would also provide for exterior informal congregation space by installing pavements/pavers and seating.
Concept designs for the renovated Building 509 facility are provided in enclosure (2). b. Area of Potential Effects
Consistent with 36 CFR 800.16(d), the APE for this project is defined as the geographic area within which the proposed undertaking may directly or indirectly cause effects to historic properties. The APE includes a buffer on Building 509 and the mechanical yard to the north of the facility to accommodate the movement of equipment, machinery, and materials necessary to demolish and construct the renovated building. Existing paved parking lots and previously disturbed areas would be utilized for equipment laydown and staging areas. A map of the APE is provided in enclosure (3).
c. Identification of Historic Properties
The APE was intensively surveyed for archaeological resources by Statistical Research, Incorporated in 2023. No archaeological resources were identified within the APE.
The proposed undertaking is approximately 600 feet east of the Lake Norconian Club Historic District, as shown in enclosure (1). The Lake Norconian Club Historic District was listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) in 2000. In 2011, ASM Affiliates (ASM) evaluated the NRHP eligibility of 73 buildings, structures, and landscape elements at DET Norco as individual sites and as potential historic districts. ASM produced a site-specific historic context divided into three potential periods of significance: 1) the Lake Norconian Club (1927-1941); 2) Naval Hospital (1941-1949; 1951-1957); and 3) Naval Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation Laboratories (1951-1989) (Pumphrey et al. 2011). Based on recommendations made by Pumphrey and others (2011), Building 509 is not a contributing element of a historic district, and has been determined to be individually ineligible for listing on the NRHP. In 2014, the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) concurred with the Navy’s determination that Building 509 is not eligible for listing on the NRHP at the state, local, or national level of significance under any applicable criteria (USN101129B).
d. Finding of Effect
Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4 (d)(1), the Navy has made the determination that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed undertaking.
Consistent with 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1)(i), the Navy respectfully requests your comments within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Please contact Scott Mattingly at (562) 626-6067, or
5000-45B
Ser N45/020
April 7, 2026
4 [email protected] if you should have any questions. References cited in this letter are provided in enclosure (4). As always, the Navy appreciates your support of its ongoing mission.
Sincerely,
SCOTT MATTINGLY
By direction
Enclosures: 1. General Project Location Map
2. Building 509 Concept Designs
3. APE
4. References Cited
Copy to:
State Historic Preservation Officer
Office of Historic Preservation
1725 23rd Street, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95816-7100
City of Norco
City Manager
2870 Clark Avenue
Norco, CA 92860
Lake Norconian Club Foundation
P.O. Box 7672
Norco, CA 92860-8089
Enclosure (1)
General Project Location
Project Location
US Army Corps
of Engineers ®
SHEET ID
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
300 SECURED GATEWAY
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35808
DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SUBMITTED BY:SIZE:
ANSI D
ISSUE DATE:SOLICITATION NO.:CONTRACT NO.:
1 N
3579 11 13 15 17 19
LJGECA
US Army Corps
DATE
of Engineers ®
SOLICITATION NO.:
CONTRACT NO.:
ISSUE DATE:
VOLUME:
MARK DESCRIPTION
Plot Date:
2468 10 12 14 16 18 20
PMKHFDB
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA)
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
1 OF 1
a Haskell Company
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) WARFARE CENTER
(NSWC), CORONA, CA
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
B509
WARFARE CENTER (NSWC), CORONA, CA
D. MOTLEY
1/15/2026 2:12:57 PM
G-001 H. BURGER H. BURGER D. MOTLEY 20260116
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
20260116
COVER SHEET
AREA MAP
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS
COMMAND WARFARE CENTER
B509 LOCATION
DRAFT RFP A 20250822
B REVISED DRAFT DB RFP 20251205
C CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP 20260116
ADN
0'-0"
+8"-16"
452 SF
NMCI
103
156 SF
OFFICE 1
105
420 SF
CONFERENCE
ROOM
107
278 SF
MECHANICAL
ROOM
123
374 SF
SECURE
STORAGE
109
1000 SF
LAB
115
3889 SF
NOC
116
265 SF
EQUIPMENT
ROOM
117
156 SF
OFFICE 2
106
1388 SF
1043
108
911 SF
VESTIBULE +
UNSECURE
BREAK ROOM
101
110 SF
CONNECTOR
110
AUX MECH
BUILDING 1
B258
AUX MECH
BUILDING 2
B538
AUX MECH
BUILDING 3
B535
VENDING
MACHINES
UNSECURE SECURE
1 2 3 4
B
A
F
G
D
C
E
101B
101D
101C
102A
103A
104A 106A
105A 107A
108A 108B
109A 111A
117A
123A
(NOT IN SCOPE)
103A 105A 107A
18' - 0" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 18' - 0"
UP
EXISTING TREE
EXISTING TREE'S
ROOT ZONE
-4"
2 A-300
1 A-300
(NOT IN SCOPE)
(NOT IN SCOPE) (NOT IN SCOPE)
67' - 11" 30' - 1" 15' - 10" 38' - 4"
COVERED ENTRY
TYP.
64' - 0"
CORRIDOR
100
COFFEE BAR
111
MOTHER'S
ROOM
102
191 SF
OFFICE 4
120
191 SF
OFFICE 3
119
195 SF
TEAM ROOM 2
121
195 SF
TEAM ROOM 3
122
5 6
121A
120A
119A
116B
119A
121A
120A
122A
122A
UP
SECURE UNSECURE
147 SF
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
124
185 SF
TEAM ROOM 1
104
115A
110B
110C
15' - 11" 37' - 8"
124A
6' - 6"
CUSTODIAL
112
112A
163' - 4"
116A
UP
5' - 0"
147 SF
STORAGE
118
257 SF
WOMENS RR
114
264 SF
MENS RR
113
118A
113A 114A
106A
115A 115B 115C
108A 108B 113A 114A
101B 102A
101A
101A
104A
63' - 2" 15' - 6"
120B
119B
4.3 4.6
21' - 0" 21' - 2" 21' - 0"
PLAN NORTH
0 8 16 24
REFER TO CIVIL
DRAWINGS FOR SITE
INFORMATION
LEGEND
FINISH FLOOR 0'-0"
RAISED ACCESS FLOOR 8"-16"
DEPRESSED FLOOR -4"
NEW EXTERIOR WALL
NEW INTERIOR PLUMBING WALL
NEW INTERIOR WALL
EXISTING WALL
EXISTING COLUMN
US Army Corps
of Engineers ®
SHEET ID
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
300 SECURED GATEWAY
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35808
DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SUBMITTED BY:SIZE:
ANSI D
ISSUE DATE:SOLICITATION NO.:CONTRACT NO.:
1 N
3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
L
J
G
E
C
A
DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
Plot Date:
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
P
M
K
H
F
D
B
a Haskell Company
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) WARFARE CENTER
(NSWC), CORONA, CA
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
B509
D. MOTLEY
1/15/2026 9:50:47 AM
A-101 A. KILLING T. WARDELL D. MOTLEY 20260116
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
FLOOR PLAN
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
B509 PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
DRAFT RFP
A 20250822
REVISED DRAFT DB RFP
B 20251205
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
C 20260116
EXISTING TREE
AUXILIARY ENTRY
CANOPY
EXISTING CLAY TILE ROOF
ADN (NOT IN SCOPE)
EXISTING MECH YARD WAL
ADN (NOT IN SCOPE)
MAIN ENTRY
CANOPY
CLAY TILE ROOF,
TYP.
EXISTING CLAY TILE ROOF
AUXILIARY BUILDING
(NOT IN SCOPE)
EXISTING CLAY TILE ROOF
AUXILIARY BUILDING
(NOT IN SCOPE)
EXISTING FLAT ROOF
AUXILIARY BUILDING
(NOT IN SCOPE)
3" / 1'-0" 3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0"
3" / 1'-0" 3" / 1'-0"
PLAN NORTH
0 8 16 24
LEGEND
EXISTING WALL - NOT IN SCOPE
EXISTING FLAT ROOF - NOT IN SCOPE
NEW CLAY TILE ROOF
EXISTING CLAY TILE ROOF - NOT IN SCOPE
NEW COVERED ENTRY
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'
-0"
ROOF PLAN
US Army Corps
of Engineers ®
SHEET ID
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
300 SECURED GATEWAY
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35808
DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SUBMITTED BY:SIZE:
ANSI D
ISSUE DATE:SOLICITATION NO.:CONTRACT NO.:
1 N
3579 11 13 15 17 19
LJGECA
DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
Plot Date:
2468 10 12 14 16 18 20
PMKHFDB
a Haskell Company
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) WARFARE CENTER
(NSWC), CORONA, CA
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
B509
D. MOTLEY
1/15/2026 9:54:56 AM
A-102 A. KILLING T. WARDELL D. MOTLEY 20260116
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
ROOF PLAN
DRAFT RFP A 20250822REVISED DRAFT DB RFP B 20251205
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP C 20260116
STUCCO WALL,
TYP.
CLAY TILE,
TYP.
WINDOW - DUAL GLAZED WITH FRAGMENT
RETENTION FILM AND TRANSLUCENT FILM,
RECESS 3" MINIMUM, TYP.
STEEL DOOR WITH
FACTORY BRONZE FINISH,
TYP.
3 12
0 8 16 24
12' - 6" 12' - 10"
5' - 8"
7' - 8" 17' - 8"
CONNECTION
INTO B509
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS W/
TRANSLUCENT FILM TO OBSCURE VISION AND
HORIZONTAL LOUVERS. - ANONDIZED BRONZE
FINISH, RECESS GLAZING 3" MINIMUM TYP.
STUCCO WALL, TYP. CLAY TILE, TYP.
3 12
3 12
3 12
CLERESTORY WINDOW - DUAL GLAZED WITH
FRAGMENT RETENTION FILM AND TRANSLUCENT FILM
TO OBSCURE VISION. RECESS GLAZING 3" MINIMUM
WINDOW - DUAL GLAZED WITH FRAGMENT RETENTION FILM
AND HORIZONTAL LOUVERS AT SOUTH FACING LOCATION, TYP.
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR -
ANODIZED BRONZE FINISH, TYP.
0 8 16 24
5' - 8" 7' - 8" 12' - 0"
3 12
3 12
3 12
3 12
CLAY TILE ROOF, TYP.
STEEL DOOR WITH
FACTORY BRONZE FINISH
STUCCO WALL, TYP.
WINDOW - DUAL GLAZED WITH
FRAGMENT RETENTION FILM,
RECESS 3" MINIMUM, TYP.
0 8 16 24
01 - FINISH FLOOR
0' - 0"
02 - SILL HEIGHT
12' - 6"
03_ROOF PEAK
25' - 4"
03 - ROOF EDGE
19' - 8"
(E) WALKWAY SILL
7' - 8"
3 12
3 12
EXISTING ADN
(NOT IN SCOPE)
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR W/
TRANSLUCENT FILM TO OBSCURE VISION -
ANODIZED BRONZE FINISH
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS W/
TRANSLUCENT FILM TO OBSCURE
VISION AND HORIZONTAL LOUVERS. -
ANONDIZED BRONZE FINISH, RECESS
GLAZING 3" MINIMUM, TYP.
CLAY TILE ROOF, TYP.
STUCCO WALL, TYP.
STEEL DOOR WITH
FACTORY BRONZE FINISH
3 12
3 12
0 8 16 24
US Army Corps
of Engineers ®
SHEET ID
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
300 SECURED GATEWAY
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35808
DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SUBMITTED BY:SIZE:
ANSI D
ISSUE DATE:SOLICITATION NO.:CONTRACT NO.:
1 N
3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19
L
J
G
E
C
A
DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
Plot Date:
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
P
M
K
H
F
D
B
a Haskell Company
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) WARFARE CENTER
(NSWC), CORONA, CA
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
B509
D. MOTLEY
1/15/2026 9:52:36 AM
A-201 A. KILLING T. WARDELL D. MOTLEY 20260116
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
NORTH ELEVATION
2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
SOUTH ELEVATION
3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
EAST ELEVATION 4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"WEST ELEVATION
DRAFT RFP
A 20250822
REVISED DRAFT DB RFP
B 20251205
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
C 20260116
03_ROOF PEAK
25' - 4"
10' - 0" 17' - 6" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 17' - 6" 10' - 0"
01_LEVEL_FF
0' - 0"
02_LEVEL
12' - 0"
ABCDEFG
ROOF SLOPE
TYP.
3 12
3 12
ROOF SLOPE.
TYP.
1' OVERHANG - 18" MAX.
13' - 4" 12' - 0"
RAISED FLOOR (+8" - 16")
1' OVERHANG - 18" MAX.
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
SPACE FOR
UTILITY EQUIPMENT
4' - 8
4' - 10"
"
119A 120A
119B 120B
116B 121A 122A
0 48 12
03_ROOF PEAK
25' - 4"
CONNECTOR
EXISTING ADN
(NOT IN SCOPE)
B509
RAMP FROM ADN FLOOR
HEIGHT UP TO B509 (+4")
RAMP FROM HALLWAY UP TO
NOC RAISED FLOOR (+8" - 16")
4"
8" - 16"
6" 12' - 0" 13' - 4"
01_LEVEL_FF
0' - 0"
02_LEVEL
12' - 0"
ABCDEFG
3 12
ROOF SLOPE.
TYP.
ROOF SLOPE
TYP.
3 12
3 12
1' OVERHANG - 18" MAX.
1' OVERHANG - 18" MAX.
COFFEE
BAR
CUST.
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
11' - 10"
13' - 2 1/2"
2' - 0 1/4"
10' - 0" 17' - 6" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 17' - 6" 10' - 0"
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
1' - 0"
SPACE FOR
UTILITY EQUIPMENT
116A
0 48 12
LEGEND
HARDLID CEILING, REFER TO SHEET A-103
RAISED ACCESS FLOOR
WINDOW TAG, REFER TO SHEET A-603
DOOR TAG, REFER TO SHEET A-603
CEILING CAVITY FOR EQUIPMENT AND UTILITY LINES
####
####
GYPSUM BOARD WALL
1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'
-0"
NOC SECTION
US Army Corps
of Engineers ®
SHEET ID
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
300 SECURED GATEWAY
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35808
DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SUBMITTED BY:SIZE:
ANSI D
ISSUE DATE:SOLICITATION NO.:CONTRACT NO.:
1 N
3579 11 13 15 17 19
LJGECA
DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
Plot Date:
2468 10 12 14 16 18 20
PMKHFDB
a Haskell Company
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) WARFARE CENTER
(NSWC), CORONA, CA
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
B509
D. MOTLEY
1/15/2026 9:52:38 AM
A-300 A. KILLING T. WARDELL D. MOTLEY 20260116
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
BUILDING SECTIONS
2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'
-0"
CONNECTOR SECTION
DRAFT RFP A 20250822REVISED DRAFT DB RFP B 20251205
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP C 20260116
01 - FINISH FLOOR
0' - 0"
03_ROOF PEAK
25' - 4"
03 - ROOF EDGE
19' - 8"
FEDCB
1' - 0"
2' - 8"
17' - 6" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 17' - 6"
3 12
ROOF SLOPE
TYP.
SPACE FOR
UTILITY EQUIPMENT
LOBBY
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT WINDOWS W/
TRANSLUCENT FILM TO OBSCURE VISION AND
HORIZONTAL LOUVERS. - ANONDIZED BRONZE
FINISH, RECESS GLAZING 3" MINIMUM TYP.
ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ENTRY DOOR W/
TRANSLUCENT FILM TO OBSCURE VISION -
ANODIZED BRONZE FINISH
HARDLID CEILING
STUCCO WALL
CLAY TILE ROOF
0 48 12
LEGEND
HARDLID CEILING, REFER TO SHEET A-103
RAISED ACCESS FLOOR
WINDOW TAG, REFER TO SHEET A-603
DOOR TAG, REFER TO SHEET A-603
CEILING CAVITY FOR EQUIPMENT AND UTILITY LINES
####
####
GYPSUM BOARD WALL
01 - FINISH FLOOR
0' - 0"
03_ROOF PEAK
25' - 4"
03 - ROOF EDGE
19' - 8"
01_LEVEL_FF
0' - 0"
02_LEVEL
12' - 0"
ABCDEFG
CONFERENCE
ROOM
MECH.
ROOM
1043
OFFICE
HALLWAY
10' - 6" 17' - 6" 4' - 0" 4' - 0" 17' - 6" 10' - 6"
0 48 12
US Army Corps
of Engineers ®
SHEET ID
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
300 SECURED GATEWAY
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35808
DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SUBMITTED BY:SIZE:
ANSI D
ISSUE DATE:SOLICITATION NO.:CONTRACT NO.:
1 N
3579 11 13 15 17 19
LJGECA
DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
Plot Date:
2468 10 12 14 16 18 20
PMKHFDB
a Haskell Company
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) WARFARE CENTER
(NSWC), CORONA, CA
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
B509
D. MOTLEY
1/15/2026 9:52:39 AM
A-301 A. KILLING T. WARDELL D. MOTLEY 20260116
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
BUILDING SECTIONS
1 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'
-0"
LOBBY SECTION
2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'
-0"
1043 OFFICE AND CONFERENCE ROOM SECTION
DRAFT RFP A 20250822REVISED DRAFT DB RFP B 20251205
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP C 20260116
1 23456
LOBBY HALLWAY NOC
SPACE FOR
UTILITY EQUIPMENT
HARDLID CEILING CLAY TILE ROOF
4.3 4.6
103A 105A 107A 109A 111A 115A
116A
17' - 8" 7' - 8"
13' - 4" 12' - 0"
0 8 16 24
LEGEND
HARDLID CEILING, REFER TO SHEET A-103
RAISED ACCESS FLOOR
WINDOW TAG, REFER TO SHEET A-603
DOOR TAG, REFER TO SHEET A-603
CEILING CAVITY FOR EQUIPMENT AND UTILITY LINES
####
####
GYPSUM BOARD WALL
1234 4.3 4.656
LOBBY MOTHERS ROOM TEAM ROOM 1 OFFICE 2 1043 MENS
RR
WOMENS
RR
EQUIPMENT
ROOM
HALLWAY NOC TEAM ROOM 2
SPACE FOR
UTILITY EQUIPMENT
HARDLID CEILING CLAY TILE ROOF
102A 104A 106A 108A 108B
25' - 4"
13' - 4" 12' - 0"
0 8 16 24
1234 4.3 4.656
LOBBY NMCI OFFICE 1 CONFERENCE ROOM STORAGE LAB NOC OFFICE 3
SPACE FOR
UTILITY EQUIPMENT
HARDLID CEILING CLAY TILE ROOF
103A 105A 107A
115A 115B
115C
19' - 8"
7' - 8" 12' - 0"
0 8 16 24
US Army Corps
of Engineers ®
SHEET ID
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
300 SECURED GATEWAY
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35808
DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SUBMITTED BY:SIZE:
ANSI D
ISSUE DATE:SOLICITATION NO.:CONTRACT NO.:
1 N
3579 11 13 15 17 19
LJGECA
DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
Plot Date:
2468 10 12 14 16 18 20
PMKHFDB
a Haskell Company
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) WARFARE CENTER
(NSWC), CORONA, CA
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
B509
D. MOTLEY
1/15/2026 9:52:40 AM
A-302 A. KILLING T. WARDELL D. MOTLEY 20260116
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
BUILDING CROSS SECTIONS
2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'
-0"
BUILDING CROSS SECTION - CENTER LINE
3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'
-0"
BUILDING CROSS SECTION - SOUTH
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'
-0"
BUILDING CROSS SECTION - NORTH
DRAFT RFP A 20250822REVISED DRAFT DB RFP B 20251205
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP C 20260116
N
US Army Corps
of Engineers ®
SHEET ID
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
300 SECURED GATEWAY
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35808
DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SUBMITTED BY:SIZE:
ANSI D
ISSUE DATE:SOLICITATION NO.:CONTRACT NO.:
1 N
3579 11 13 15 17 19
LJGECA
DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
Plot Date:
2468 10 12 14 16 18 20
PMKHFDB
a Haskell Company
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) WARFARE CENTER
(NSWC), CORONA, CA
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
B509
D. MOTLEY
1/15/2026 9:53:48 AM
A-801 A. KILLING T. WARDELL D. MOTLEY 20260116
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
3D VIEWS
1 SCALE:
3D VIEW - SOUTH WEST
N
US Army Corps
of Engineers ®
SHEET ID
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
HUNTSVILLE CENTER
300 SECURED GATEWAY
HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35808
DESIGNED BY:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:SUBMITTED BY:SIZE:
ANSI D
ISSUE DATE:SOLICITATION NO.:CONTRACT NO.:
1 N
3579 11 13 15 17 19
LJGECA
DATE MARK DESCRIPTION
Plot Date:
2468 10 12 14 16 18 20
PMKHFDB
a Haskell Company
NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (NAVSEA) WARFARE CENTER
(NSWC), CORONA, CA
RENOVATION TO BUILDING 509
W912DY24F0419
B509
D. MOTLEY
1/15/2026 9:53:55 AM
A-802 A. KILLING T. WARDELL D. MOTLEY 20260116
CORRECTED FINAL DB RFP
3D VIEWS
1 SCALE:
3D VIEW - NORTH EAST
Enclosure (3)
APE
APE
Enclosure (4)
References Cited
Pumphrey, Michael Preston, Sarah Stringer-Bowsher, and Shannon Davis. 2011. Survey, Evaluation, and Update of National Register of Historic Places Eligibility at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, Detachment Corona, in Norco, Riverside County, California. ASM Affiliates, Incorporated, Carlsbad, California. Submitted to Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest. Copies on file at the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Cultural Resources Management office.
Statistical Research, Incorporated. 2023. Report for the Archaeological Survey of 185 Acres at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, Detachment Norco, California. Statistical Research, Incorporated, Redlands, California. Submitted to Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Southwest. Copies on file at the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Cultural Resources Management office.
1) Build a new building to the North/ East or to the South adjacent to the existing cluster of buildings to meet today’s needs for a purpose-built IT Facility without demolishing Building 509.
2) Utilize another facility on another site for the IT Facility and continue to maintain building 509 and the surrounding buildings in their historic state. 3) Keep the existing shell of the building and retrofit it structurally to meet seismic and water penetration needs. Provide grading around the existing building that would not damage the existing structure and footing but would direct water away from the existing building. If the existing shell (exterior) of the building is preserved the interior can be gutted and full abatement and modernization can occur on the interior. This solution would maintain the exterior historical character of the building and keep the continuity between building 509 and surrounding buildings. This is called adaptive re-use.
Overall Comments on New Design:
1) The overall design of the new building does not match the language of the existing surrounding buildings. It does not compliment the overall architectural language of the existing cluster of surrounding buildings. It does not blend in with the existing site.
2) The scale of the new building does not match the surrounding buildings. The height is too tall.
3) The new roof overhang of 12”-18” does not match the existing roof overhang of building 509 and surrounding buildings. Roof Slope and overhang should match existing and surrounding buildings.
4) Where are the Cupulas on the New Building? The Existing building and surrounding buildings have small chimney’s / cupulas that are part of the architectural design of the existing buildings.
Attachment B
Michelle Heasley Comments
Thank you for sharing your plans for Building 509 with the City of Norco and being open to feedback regarding the new design of the building. After carefully looking at photos of the existing site, building and adjacent buildings I have concluded that the proposed design does not appear to be the appropriate scale and design for the existing site. Please see my thoughts on alternative options and overall design comments below.
Alternative options:
5) Where is the Reflected Ceiling Plan for the building? Why can we not see the ceiling heights in each space?
6) Why is there a need to go up +8”-16” with ramps in the new construction? Could the floor height be contained at +0” and equipment be placed underground in that area to keep the roof from being raised? This would remove the need for ramps on interior as well.
7) Can the ceiling be open to the underside of structure with exposed fire sprinklers and HVAC vents to fix the low ceiling issues within the building instead of dropped hard lid or acoustic ceiling tiles? Many oFice spaces are now open to above. Vertical mechanical duct shafts can be used to get ventilation to existing spaces with low ceiling heights. The use of mini split systems that are ductless are also an option for rooms with low ceilings without raising the overall building height. An open to structure ceiling would potentially allow the building not to have the overall height raised and can potentially help save the existing structure.
8) The proposed aluminum storefront window system and louvers on the West side of the building does not match the current architectural language of the existing building and surrounding buildings that will remain. Having this much glazing on the Western elevation will not be eFicient and will result in a demand for larger scale HVAC system. I would suggest this design feature be re-thought. 9) The modern metal entry canopies do not match the language of the existing building or the surrounding buildings. I would suggest this design feature be redesigned.
10) The new design has windows in the mother’s room and the restrooms. This is not typical for privacy and security. The renderings have people gathering right outside the mother’s room.
11) The 3D rendering does not match the floor plan leaving the window for the “Team Room 1” out.
Sincerely,
Michelle Heasley
Attachment C
Dan Letbetter Comments
On Fri, Apr 17, 2025 at 2:31 PM Daniel Letbetter— wrote:
Hello Lisette, Julie and Bill,
Relative to the action from the April 14 meeting, please find below my thoughts and recommendations regarding the renovation of NWSC Building 509.
It seems to me as thought the Navy has gone directly to a solution rather than a going through a process of identifying the requirements, assessing opportunities and alternatives, and then developing the solution, This process would normally include:
Documenting what the requirements are, what does the function of the building or mission or objectives require? These would include:
I Number of personnel, offices, meeting rooms etc. that are required to ?t in the new building I Electrical requirements, not only for standard lighting etc, but for computing, lab and other technical needs.
I HVAC considerations, again unique cooling for server farms, labs, etc.
I Other special needs such as special mou ings for antennas, server racks etc.
I Special building requirements for a classIerd or secure fac ty I etc.
Based on these requirements, has there been any sort of analysis of alternatives conducted? I Is there any other building or unused segment of an existing building that could potentially meet the requirements.
I Ifthere are no other buildings available, is there an area of available unused land where a facility could be built?
I Based on the answer(s) to the above, has a cost trade been performed. What would be the cost of modifying another non-heritage building. What would be the cost of building a whole new building from the ground up on a new plot of land, what is the cost of renovating building 509?
oThese costs could vary signi?cantly since one could require minor mods, one would be a new build without teardown costs (clean sheet approach), and the other (building 509 renovation) could have signi?cant cost drivers including asbestos removal, signi?cant new power requirements and classi?ed / SCIF build which would be signi?cant.
I Once an assessment of alternatives based on requirements and a cost trade has been complete, then it seems the Navy would be in a better position to move forward with the build, possibly something other than Building 509.
Just my quick thoughts and two cents. I would imagine it's all kind of moot, since the building wasn't added to the historical preservation list and is now owned by the Navy and they‘re going to pretty much move forward.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Dan Letbetter
May 20, 2026
Scott Mattingly
Cultural Resources Manager
Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach
800 Seal Beach Boulevard
Seal Beach, CA 90740-5000
Re: Proposed Building 509 Demolition and Reconstruction Thank you for giving the City of Norco an opportunity to comment on the proposed replacement of Building 509 in the inner compound of Naval Weapons Station, Norco.
We strongly oppose this undertaking. To begin with, we are working with an attorney who has opined that the entire former Naval Hospital Corona property is actually on the National Register due to the Navy’s having missed a key deadline for comment. We are currently working with the Keeper of the National Register to acknowledge this finding and formally list the entire Naval Hospital Corona property on the National Register of Historic Places. We believe the property on which Building 509 is located should be treated as a historic resource on the expanded Lake Norconian Club National Register Historic District.
In regard to the proposed undertaking, we find the proposed building to be completely out of scale and architecturally incompatible with the balance of the inner compound and the National Register Historic District overall.
We request that the Navy:
1. Redraw the undertaking plans to contain all aspects of the proposed use of Building 509 to the interior of the existing leaving the exterior of the building unaltered.
2. If Recommendation 1 is not feasible, either:
a. Build a new building to accommodate the proposed building functions elsewhere on the Weapons Station campus, utilizing an architectural style and scale that is compatible with the other 500 series buildings on the campus; or
b. Build a building on another Navy property to accommodate the proposed building functions.
3. If Recommendation 1 or 2a are chosen, return the revised undertaking to the Historic Preservation and Agricultural Heritage Commission for its review and comments.
Sincerely,
Robin Grundmeyer
Mayor
Cc: Julianne Polanco, State Historic Preservation Officer Su Bacon, Lake Norconian Club Foundation
Bill Wilkman, Wilkman Historical Services
City Council
STAFF REPORT
Date: May 20, 2026 Agenda Item:
6.A.
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Lisette Free, City Manager
Prepared By: Lisette Free, City Manager
Department: Human Resources
SUBJECT:
Authorizing the City of Norco Human Resources Department to Access State and Federal Summary Criminal History Information
RECOMMENDATION:
Conduct a public hearing, adopt the attached Resolution 2026-37 authorizing the City of Norco Human Resources Department to access state, local, and federal summary criminal history information for employment, volunteer, and independent contractor screening purposes, as required under Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11) and conduct first reading of Ordinance 1142.
SUMMARY:
In connection with applications for City employment, including volunteer and independent contractor positions, the City shall require applicants to submit fingerprint images and related information to the California Department of Justice for the purpose of obtaining state and federal criminal history information, including transmission to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a national criminal history background check. The California Department of Justice (DOJ) has reviewed the City’s draft resolution and confirmed it meets statutory requirements for authorizing access to federal summary criminal history information, subject to formal Council approval. Adoption of this Resolution will allow the City’s Human Resources Department, as the authorized agency, to obtain state and federal criminal history information through submission of fingerprint images to DOJ for transmission to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
The Resolution also establishes mandatory exclusions for applicants convicted of a violent or serious felony or misdemeanor, consistent with the statutory conditions set forth in Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11). The authority granted will apply to City employees, volunteers, and independent contractors.
BACKGROUND:
The City has historically conducted state-level background checks for certain employment categories. However, in consultation with DOJ and based on operational needs, it became evident that federal-level background checks are necessary for positions with access to sensitive systems or vulnerable populations.
DOJ guidance indicates that federal screening cannot be performed unless the City Council has adopted a compliant resolution. The attached Resolution provides the required authority and identifies the Human Resources Department as the official agency to receive confidential criminal history data.
State law authorizes cities to access summary criminal history information for limited employment-related purposes where:
A statute requires or permits such screening; and
The governing body expressly authorizes the access by resolution.
These conditions arise from Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11), which allow access to both state and federal criminal history records when appropriate fingerprint submissions are transmitted to DOJ and subsequently to the FBI.
The DOJ requires all agencies seeking federal-level background checks to submit a compliant resolution identifying:
The categories of individuals subject to fingerprint-based checks; The specific employment-related purpose; and
Any exclusionary criteria tied to criminal conduct.
Internal correspondence from DOJ confirms that the City’s draft resolution contains the required statutory language and should be adopted without modification to avoid delays or denial by the FBI.
Once signed, the Resolution will be transmitted to DOJ for final processing and forwarding to the FBI to finalize the City's access authorization.
The Ordinance adds a new Chapter 2.30, entitled “Background Checks" to the City of Norco Municipal Code.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with adoption of the Resolution beyond standard DOJ and FBI fingerprint rolling and processing fees per applicant and will be incorporated into the FY 2026-27 Operating Budget. FBI background checks are currently an additional $17 per submission resulting in a total DOJ/FBI cost in the amount $49.
RELATIONSHIP TO STRATEGIC PLAN:
This item is consistent with Strategic Plan Direction No. 2 - "Human Capital".
REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY:
Certified as to Availability of Funds: Joshua Calhoun, Finance Director Approved by: Lisette Free, City Manager
Approved as to Form: Harper and Burns, LLP, City Attorney ATTACHMENT(S):
Resolution 2026-37 - FBI Level of Service
Ordinance No. 1142 Background Checks
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NORCO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF NORCO
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT TO ACCESS STATE AND
FEDERAL SUMMARY CRIMINAL HISTORY INFORMATION
WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11) authorize cities to access state and local summary criminal history information for employment purposes; and
WHEREAS, Penal Code Section 11105(b)(11) also authorizes cities to access federal level criminal history information by transmitting fingerprint images and related information to the Department of Justice for transmission to the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and
WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11) require that there be a requirement or exclusion from employment expressly based on specific criminal conduct on the part of the subject of the record; and WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11) require that the City Council specifically authorize access to summary criminal history information for employment purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has not yet specifically authorized access to summary criminal history information for employment purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Norco Human Resources Department is hereby authorized to access state, local, and federal summary criminal history information for employment purposes. In connection with applications for City of Norco employment, including volunteer and independent contractor positions, the City of Norco Human Resources Department shall require applicants to submit fingerprint images and related information to the California Department of Justice for the purpose of obtaining state and federal criminal history information, including transmission to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for a national criminal history background check. The City of Norco Human Resources Department may not disseminate the information to a private entity.
Resolution No. 2026-37 – Authorization for Background Checks
May 20, 2026
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Norco Human Resources Department shall not consider a person who has been convicted of a violent or serious felony or misdemeanor eligible for employment, including volunteers and contract employees.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting held on May 20, 2026.
___________________________
Robin Grundmeyer, Mayor
City of Norco, California
ATTEST:
____________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk
City of Norco
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on May 20, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on May 20, 2026. ________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk
City of Norco, California
ORDINANCE NO 1142
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NORCO ADDING CHAPTER 2.30 TO THE NORCO
MUNICIPAL CODE, ENTITLED “BACKGROUND
CHECKS”
WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11) authorize cities to access state and local summary criminal history information for employment, licensing or certification purposes; and
WHEREAS, Penal Code Section 11105(b)(11) also authorizes cities to access federal level criminal history by transmitting fingerprint images and related information to the Department of Justice to be transmitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and WHEREAS, Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11) require that the City Council specifically authorize access to summary criminal history information for employment, licensing, or certification purposes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has not yet specifically authorized access to summary criminal history information for all employment, licensing, or certification purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NORCO
ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Title 2 of the Norco Municipal Code, entitled “Administration and Personnel,” is hereby amended by adding a new Chapter 2.30, entitled “Background Checks,” to read in its entirety as follows:
2.30.010 Background Checks Required.
California Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11) authorize city authorities to access state and local summary criminal history information for employment, licensing, or certification purposes; and authorize access to federal level criminal history information by transmitting fingerprint images and related information to the Department of Justice to be transmitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Pursuant to California Penal Code Sections 11105(b)(11) and 13300(b)(11), such background checks shall be conducted as follows:
A. A background check is authorized to be conducted prior to any type of employment by the City of Norco, including for volunteer and independent contractor positions. No person shall be employed by the City of Norco if the applicant has been convicted of an offense that is substantially related
Ordinance No. 1142 – Background Check
June 3, 2026
to the qualifications, functions, or duties of the employment position, as determined by the City Manager or his/her designee.
B. A background check is authorized to be conducted prior to issuance of any City license, permit, or certification only where the Norco Municipal Code or other applicable ordinance expressly refers to specific criminal conduct and imposes requirements or exclusions based on that conduct.
Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 3. Compliance with CEQA. The City Council hereby finds that the action to adopt this Ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the adoption of this Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, and pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15183 (consistent with the general plan and zoning). The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published as required by law.
Section 4. Publication; Effective Date. A summary of this Ordinance shall be published and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to the Council meeting at which it is adopted.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its final passage, and the summary of this Ordinance shall be published within fifteen (15) days after the adoption, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for or against same, in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the City of Norco, County of Riverside, State of California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco at a regular meeting this 3rd day of June, 2026.
_____________________________
Robin Grundmeyer
Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter
City Clerk
Ordinance No. 1142 – Background Check
June 3, 2026
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
HARPER & BURNS LLP
___________________________
City Attorney
I, Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk of the City of Norco, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Norco, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on June 3, 2026, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Norco, California, on June 3, 2026. ________________________
Dayna Williams-Hunter, City Clerk
City of Norco, California