5.3.3 LAND USE AND ZONING
Oakdale has a 63.5 percent rate of owner-occupied residences, compared to a 36.5 percent rate of renter-occupied residences. Oakdale has a higher percentage of owneroccupied residences than San Joaquin County and Stanislaus County. Fifty-nine percent of residences in San Joaquin County are owner-occupied, and 59.5 percent of Stanislaus County’s residences are owner-occupied.
Figure 2
Zoning Map, Oakdale
Source: Oakdale Planning Division
5.3.4 RACE AND ETHNICITY
Oakdale, Stanislaus County, and California experienced demographic shifts between 2010 and 2022 based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates. The Hispanic or Latino, White, Black, and Some other race all increased in the City of Oakdale. With the exception of the White population, the County of Stanislaus also saw increases in these populations. Both Oakdale and Stanislaus County saw substantial increases in the population of two or more races. 471
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Table 2
Population by Race, Oakdale and the Region, 2010-2022
Race or Ethnicity
Oakdale Stanislaus County California
2010 2022 2010 2022 2010 2022
Hispanic or Latino 4,403 7,473 206,983 277,408 13,456,157 15,617,930 White alone 17,619 16,143 245,803 198,283 15,107,042 15,175,598 Black/African American alone 62 260 13,230 12,986 2,163,955 2,121,422 Native American alone 301 249 3,126 1,993 153,430 504,589 Asian alone 575 501 26,026 31,628 4,683,828 6,054,038
Native Hawaiian or Other
Pacific Islander alone 83 28 3,101 3,817 131,505 159,920 Some other race alone 1,110 2,381 696 1,740 109,184 7,597,084 Two or More Races 326 3,558 10,717 23,420 832,189 7,416,691 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, B02001 & B03003 The primary demographic group in census tracts within Oakdale consists of the population of White alone, not Hispanic or Latino residents. The population of one census tract in southeastern Oakdale primarily consists of Hispanic or Latino residents. The primary demographic group in census tracts surrounding Oakdale consists of Hispanic or Latino and White alone, not Hispanic or Latino populations.
Figure 3
Racial Demographics of Oakdale and the Surrounding Region, 2017-2021 Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer 472
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Figure 4
Racial Demographics of Oakdale by Block Group
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer Racial/ethnic segregation in Stanislaus County decreased between 1990 and 2000 for Asian or Pacific Islander/White and Hispanic or Latino/White, and increased significantly for Black/White. Black/White residents are the most segregated in Stanislaus County compared to other racial and ethnic groups, followed by Asian or Pacific Islander/White residents (Table 2). These groups experience a moderate level of segregation, with dissimilarity index scores between 40 and 54. Hispanic/Latino residents and NonWhite/White are the least segregated in the county, with a dissimilarity score below 40, indicating a low level of segregation on a regional level.
Table 3
Racial Dissimilarity Trends for Stanislaus County
1990 2000 2010 2020
Non-White/White 29.26 29.8 32.25 34.47
Asian or Pacific Islander/White 44.87 33.74 38.32 46.31 Black/White 29.33 42.76 42.78 49.11
Hispanic or Latino/White 39.17 31.32 32.69 34.47
Source: HUD, 2023, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool
5.3.5 PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) defines a person with a disability as someone who “has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a history or record of such an impairment (such as cancer that is in remission), or is perceived by others as having such an impairment (such as a person who has scars from a severe burn).” A person with a disability is at greater risk for housing insecurity, homelessness, and institutionalization, particularly when they lose aging caregivers. Over twelve percent of Oakdale residents (12.6 percent) have a disability 473
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
according to 2022 American Community Survey data, which is similar to the estimated
12.7% of the population within Stanislaus County with a disability. The two most common disabilities in Oakdale are independent living difficulty and ambulatory difficulty.
Table 4
Population by Type of Disability
Disability Oakdale
Percentage
Stanislaus
County
Percentage
With an independent living difficulty 7.7% 6.8%
With an ambulatory difficulty 7.5% 6.7%
With a cognitive difficulty 5.3% 5.3%
With a vision difficulty 3.2% 2.7%
With a self-care difficulty 3.7% 2.9%
With a hearing difficulty 3.5% 3.9%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, Table S1810, 1-Year Estimates, 2022 Within this population, there are significant differences in disability status by race and ethnicity. Black residents are disproportionately affected by disabilities compared to other groups. In Oakdale, 33.3 percent of Black residents have a disability. The greatest share of individuals with disabilities, 64 percent, are over the age of 75.
Table 5
Disability Status by Race and Ethnicity in Oakdale
Race or Ethnicity Total
Population
# with a
disability
% with a
disability
Total non-institutionalized population 22,986 2,901 12.6% White alone 16,034 221 13.9%
Black or African American alone 249 83 33.3%
American Indian and Alaska Native alone 249 57 22.9%
Asian alone 501 27 5.4%
Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander
alone 28 0 0.0%
Some other race / two or more races 2,379 215 9.0%
Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 7,434 669 9.0%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Table S1810, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, 2022 474
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
According to the AFFH Data Viewer, the highest concentration of persons with a disability in Oakdale is in the Northeast Census tract of the City, with approximately 18% of the population having a disability. For all other Census tracts within the City, between 9.7% and 12.8% of the population has a disability.
5.3.6 FAMILIAL STATUS
Data from the American Community Survey indicates that Oakdale has fewer children in female-headed households and a similar share of single adult householders compared to the surrounding area. Oakdale has a slightly higher percentage of married households than the County, with Oakdale at 53% of households and Stanislaus County at 51%.
Female headed households with children make up 3.6% of households in Oakdale and 5% of households in Stanislaus County.
Figure 5
Percent of Children in Single Female-Headed Households
Figure 6
Percent of Single Adult Householders
Source: California Housing & Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer (Figs 5-6) 475
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
According to the AFFH Data Viewer, there are no significant concentrations of children in female headed households or single adult householders within the City.
5.3.7 INCOME
Household income is a key determinant of the quality of housing a household is able to access. Lower-income households face barriers to housing affordability when balancing the cost of housing with other necessities. While economic factors alone are not classified as a fair housing concern, the relationship between household income, household composition, race and ethnicity, and other factors can illuminate biases and misconceptions that create fair housing concerns.
Table 6
Households by Household Income Level, 2020
<30% AMI 30-50% AMI 50-80% AMI 80-100% AMI >100% AMI
Oakdale 830 1,155 1,220 775 4,195
San Joaquin
County 27,690 27,110 38,025 23,525 114,735
Stanislaus
County 19,440 21,580 31,220 17,865 84,730
Source: HUD, CHAS 5-YEAR Estimates, 2020
Oakdale has a slightly lower percentage of lower-income households compared to San Joaquin County and Stanislaus County. 39% of Oakdale households earn less than 80% of the area median income (AMI), while 40% of San Joaquin County households and 41% of Stanislaus County households earn less than 80% of the AMI.
Table 7
Median Household Income by Family Type
Total Families Married-couple
families
Female
householder
Male
householder
Oakdale $83,110 $97,492 $110,694 $53,159 $45,117
Stanislaus County $74,872 $83,732 $99,972 $45,763 $69,290 Source: ACS 5-Year Estimates, 2022
According to American Community Survey 5-Year estimates in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars, the median income in Oakdale is $83,110. The median income in Oakdale is higher than Stanislaus County at $74,872. Generally, households have a higher median income than the surrounding Stanislaus County, except for male householders. 476
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
According to the AFFH Data Viewer, there are two Census Block Groups (CBG) with median incomes below $55,000. These two Block Groups are located South of East F St, one contains the neighborhoods to the North, West, and South of Oakdale High School.
The other CBG contains the Oak Leaf Meadows affordable housing development, with 55 affordable units. A significant portion of the CBG is either farmland or zoned for industrial use.
Figure 7
Median Income by Census Tract, Oakdale
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer Within the block groups in Oakdale, some areas have higher concentrations of low to moderate income. The highest concentrations of low to moderate income are located in central and southeastern Oakdale, as shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8
Low to Moderate Income Population by Block Group, Oakdale Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer 477
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.3.7 POVERTY
Poverty thresholds, as defined by the Census Bureau, vary by household type but remain constant throughout the country and do not correspond to Area Median Income.
Approximately 13.0% of Oakdale residents were determined to be living below the poverty level, more than the 12.1% of San Joaquin County residents 12.2% of Californians in poverty, and less than the 15.1% of Stanislaus County residents.
Figure 9
Population by Poverty Status, Oakdale
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer
5.3.8 RACIALLY AND ETHNICALLY CONCENTRATED AREAS OF
POVERTY AND AFFLUENCE
HUD defines census tracts with a majority non-white population (greater than 50 percent) that have either a poverty rate that exceeds 40 percent or is three times the average tract poverty rate for the metro/micro area, whichever threshold is lower, as Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs). There are no R/ECAPs or areas of High Segregation & Poverty in the City of Oakdale.
The City of Oakdale does not contain any Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence (RCAAs). RCAA refers to a geographic region where a high proportion of affluent individuals of a particular racial or ethnic group predominantly reside. Small portions of an RCAA with a high proportion of White individuals were identified the northern and southernmost areas of Oakdale in 2019, but not classified as an RCAA in the 2022 maps. 478
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Figure 10
Racially Concentrated Areas of Affluence, 2022
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 3.0 Data Viewer 479
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.4 DISPARITIES IN ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY
5.4.1 RESOURCE AREAS
The California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) Opportunity Area Composite Score evaluates the level of resources associated with education, poverty, proximity to employment and economic prospects, pollution levels, and other relevant factors across geographic areas. The final scores are divided into four primary categories: Highest Resource, High Resource, Moderate Resource, and Low Resource. Oakdale is comprised of Moderate, High, and Highest Resource Areas.
Figure 11
TCAC Opportunity Map Composite Score, City of Oakdale, 2024 Source: California State Treasurer, CTCAC/HCD Opportunity Map Several of the jurisdictions of similar geographic size and population surrounding Oakdale also contain areas categorized as Moderate, High, and Highest Resource. A High Resource area contains a high diversity of economic, educational and health and safety resources and amenities that can be associated with high opportunity areas. In contrast to Oakdale, the surrounding jurisdictions of Stockton and Modesto contain a mix of TCAC Opportunity Area Composite Scores.
480
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Figure 12
TCAC Opportunity Map Composite Score, Oakdale and Surrounding Area, 2024 Source: California State Treasurer, CTCAC/HCD Opportunity Map The 2026 TCAC Opportunity Map substantially retains the characteristics of the 2024 map, with several Moderate Resource Areas reflecting insufficient data to receive a resource designation on the newer map. The Housing Element document primarily reflects the 2024 Opportunity Map for consistency to reflect the beginning of the planning period.
Figure 13
TCAC Opportunity Map Composite Score, Oakdale and Surrounding Area, 2026 Source: California State Treasurer, CTCAC/HCD Opportunity Map 481
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.4.2 EDUCATION
Schools in Oakdale are dispersed throughout the City, with each quadrant of the City containing multiple schools. Oakdale High School is located in the Southwest quadrant of the City and there are several preschools and elementary schools located throughout the City. According to the AFFH Data Viewer, each Census Tract is rated with the Highest Education Composite Score.
An indicator of educational outcomes is school district performance. The California School Dashboard is an online tool developed by the California Department of Education to provide a comprehensive and multi-dimensional view of school and district performance. It offers a range of data and information to help parents, educators, and the public evaluate and understand how schools and districts are performing in various areas. According to the California School Dashboard, the Oakdale Joint Unified School District (OJU) serves 5,174 students, of which 52.4 percent are socioeconomically disadvantaged and 11.6% are English Learners. OJU’s student population is predominantly comprised of White students (51.7%), followed by Hispanic students (41.4%).
Table 8
Student Population, 2024
Student Group Oakdale
Total
Oakdale
Percentage
Stanislaus
Total
Stanislaus
Percentage State Total State
Percentage
English Learners 599 11.6% 168 22.7% 1,074,883 18.4%
Foster Youth 17 0.3% 10 1.4% 29,815 0.5%
Homeless 24 0.5% 14 14% 210,907 3.6%
Socioeconomically
Disadvantaged 2,713 52.4% 525 70.9% 3,659,382 62.7%
Students with
Disabilities 712 13.8% 483 65.3% 799,980 13.7%
Race/Ethnicity Oakdale
Total
Oakdale
Percentage
Stanislaus
Total
Stanislaus
Percentage State Total State
Percentage
African American 40 0.8% 43 5.8% 287,380 4.9%
American Indian 25 0.5% 8 1.1% 25,424 0.4%
Asian 58 1.1% 20 2.7% 576,459 9.9%
Filipino 27 0.5% 6 0.8% 130,095 2.2%
Hispanic 2,141 41.4% 436 58.9% 3,275,030 56.1%
482
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Pacific Islander 188 3.6% 24 3.2% 269,631 4.6%
Two or More
Races 9 0.2% 3 0.4% 23,765 0.4%
White 2,673 51.7% 186 25.1% 1,183,450 20.3%
Total Enrollment 5,174 100% 726 100% 5,771,234 100%
Source: California School Dashboard, Oakdale Joint Unified, Stanislaus County Office of Education, State of California, 2024
Oakdale schools serve a significantly lower percentage of socioeconomically disadvantaged students (52.4%) than Stanislaus County (70.9%), and the State (62.7%), as identified in Table 6. Oakdale schools have a significantly higher proportion of white students compared to Stanislaus County and the State, and have a lower proportion of Hispanic Students, compared to the County and State. Oakdale Unified School District generally has a lower proportion of students who are English learners, homeless, foster youth, and socioeconomically disadvantaged than Stanislaus County and the State.
However, Oakdale Unified School District does serve about the same proportion of students with a disability as the State. Stanislaus County Schools serve a much higher proportion of students with a disability than Oakdale and the State.
The data provided in Table 8 delves into the English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics achievement levels within OJU, comparing them against both the Stanislaus County and State of California averages. OJU outperforms the County average in the higher achievement categories of “Standard Exceeded” and “Standard Met” in both subjects.
Table 9
Student Achievement Levels, 2023
Achievement Level
English Language Arts/Literacy Mathematics Achievement
OJU County State OJU County State
Standard Exceeded: Level 4 17.70% 12.84% 20.73% 13.29% 8.68% 17.14% Standard Met: Level 3 27.72% 23.66% 25.93% 21.07% 15.41% 17.48% Standard Nearly Met: Level 2 25.29% 24.69% 22.17% 28.17% 25.61% 24.06% Standard Not Met: Level 1 29.29% 38.81% 31.17% 37.48% 50.30% 41.32% Source: California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Schools are distributed throughout Oakdale and generally, schools in Oakdale perform better than the surrounding County. There are no predominant disparities in access to quality schools within Oakdale.
483
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.4.3 ACCESS TO A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT
The California Office for Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (COEHHA) released the latest version of CalEnviroScreen in October 2021. Cal EnviroScreen 4.0 is a tool used to identify communities that are disproportionately affected by multiple sources of pollution and environmental hazards. The tool combines various environmental, health, and socioeconomic data to create a screening methodology that helps prioritize resources and actions to address environmental justice concerns. A community within the 75th percentile or above is one with higher levels of pollution and/or has other negative environmental traits and is considered a “disadvantaged community.” As depicted in Figure 12, Oakdale contains three census tracts within the 75th percentile or above. The pollution burden within Oakdale is high, likely due to in part to high rates of pesticide exposure from agricultural uses such as almond groves. The following table includes analysis of the disaggregated scores by Census tract, with five indicators noted as above the 75th percentile (pesticides, solid waste, asthma, cardiovascular disease, and unemployment), and an additional four with scores above the 66th percentile (ozone and lead from housing).
Figure 14
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 by Census Tract, 2021
Source: California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Calenviroscreen
4.0 484
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Table 10
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Indicators by Geography, Oakdale
Overall
Percentile/Factor NW Oakdale SW Oakdale East Oakdale
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile 64 79 77
Pollution Burden Percentile 74 86 83
Population Characteristics Percentile 52 64 63
Exposures
Ozone 68 69 69
Particulate Matter 2.5 59 60 58
Diesel Particulate Matter 31 61 56
Toxic Releases 50 50 42
Traffic 39 35 28
Pesticides 87 83 92
Drinking Water 54 54 67
Lead from Housing 67 42 30
Environmental Effects
Cleanup Sites 26 63 53
Groundwater Threats 11 23 31
Hazardous Waste 19 50 54
Impaired Waters 67 67 59
Solid Waste 80 85 84
Sensitive Population
Asthma 75
Low Birth Weight 19 20 9
Cardiovascular Disease 94
Socioeconomic Factors
Education 49 52 59
Linguistic Isolation 0 25 25
Poverty 43 50 68
Unemployment 72 91 97
Housing Burden 35 57 38
Source: CalEnviroScreen 4.0. Shaded cells represent top 1/3 of statewide average.
CalEnviroScreen factors indicate areas of disproportionate pollution burden and health impacts among Oakdale residents. The following eight factors were identified as above the 66th percentile, or in the highest third among California Census tracts:
• Ozone – The CalEnviroScreen noted citywide ozone pollution; ozone is generated by the reaction of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 485
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
in the presence of sunlight. Housing-based mitigation measures can include locating sites away from heavy industrial uses and reduction of urban heat island effect through the use of shade trees and structures in housing site planning and infrastructure improvements.
• Pesticides – High pesticide exposure noted citywide ranging from 83rd to 92nd percentile; program action included to support education for integrated pest management (IPM) strategies in housing landscaping and services. • Lead from Housing – Disproportionate score (67th) in Northwest Oakdale; Neighborhood Improvements Program 3-6 included to support lead testing and mitigation actions in older housing stock including the NW quadrant of the City. • Solid Waste – Citywide high scores (80th to 84th percentile); housing sites are located away from facilities used for the collection, transport, processing, and diversion of waste. For housing-based solutions, see programs to address sensitive populations represented in Oakdale (Asthma and Cardiovascular Disease). • Asthma – The citywide asthma rate was ranked in the 75th percentile; housingbased solutions include promoting the upgrade and maintenance of HVAC systems in new and existing housing near major highways and industrial uses. • Cardiovascular Disease – Cardiovascular disease was pronounced in the CalEnviroScreen scores, with a citywide 94th percentile score. Housing-based solutions include improvement of indoor air quality through the promotion of electric or induction cooking, improved ventilation systems, weatherization and insulation upgrades, and access to grocery stores with healthy food for cardiovascular disease prevention and management.
• Unemployment – High unemployment noted citywide, with highest percentiles in SW Oakdale (91st) and East Oakdale (97th). Program 3-6(C) included to consider accessory commercial units (ACUs) throughout the City to promote small business and economic development in association with the housing stock.
The California Healthy Places Index (HPI) is a tool that measures and assesses the health and well-being of communities across California. The HPI takes into account a wide range of factors such as access to healthcare services, education, housing, economic opportunities, air and water quality, transportation options, and more. By analyzing these factors and assigning scores to different regions, the HPI aims to identify areas with higher levels of health disparities and inform the public about where investments and interventions are needed to improve overall well-being.
Oakdale is within the 48.1 percentile, meaning that Oakdale has healthier community conditions than 48.1 percent of other California Tracts. According to the HPI, Oakdale has higher scores in indicators assessing social (73.0), neighborhood (62.6), housing (59.5), and healthcare access (68.4) conditions, and lower scores in indicators assessing economic (43.7), education (31.3), transportation (13), and clean environment (25.5) conditions. Additionally, Oakdale has a higher score in the indicator measuring housing habitability than the San Joaquin County (30.4) and Stanislaus County (46.4) averages.
The housing habitability indicator is defined as the percent of households with basic kitchen facilities and plumbing.
486
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Figure 15
Healthy Places Index, 2022
Source: Public Health Alliance of Southern California, California Healthy Places Index Oakdale generally has a higher percentile ranking on the Healthy Places Index than nearby Riverbank, Modesto, and Waterford, however, ranks lower than Escalon and Ripon, indicating Oakdale residents can expect health outcomes on par with the State average.
487
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.4.4 TRANSPORTATION
StanRTA operates one bus route through Oakdale, Route 60. StanRTA is the primary provider of public transportation throughout Stanislaus County. Route 60 runs southwest to northeast through Oakdale along F Street, A Street, and D Street with 13 stops in the City. StanRTA provides access to information and services on their website. Real-time bus tracking is available on the website, as well as the app myStop. For transit users requiring subsidies, StanRTA offers an application for half fares on the website. StanRTA also offers dial-a-ride services in Oakdale providing curb-to-curb transportation to the general public within the city of Oakdale. Service is available Monday through Friday between 5:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m., Saturday between 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., and Sunday between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Commuters using transit to travel regionally must take Route 60 to the Downtown Transit Center (DTC) in Modesto where they can transfer to one of several interregional routes including the ACE Commuter that travels between the DTC and the Lathrop Altamont Corridor Express (ACE) Station, the Stockton Commuter which travels between the DTC and the Stockton Transit Center, and the Modesto BART Commuter which travels between the DTC and the Dublin/Pleasanton Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Station. For residents to take the earliest Commuter routes out of the Modesto Downtown Transit Center, they must drive to the DTC or find an alternative means of transportation.
StanRTA also provides an ADA paratransit service that operates everyday with hours of service Monday through Friday between 4:45 a.m. and 11:15 p.m., Saturday between 6:15 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., and Sunday between 8:00 a.m. and 8:15 p.m. ADA paratransit passengers must call for service at least one day in advance, and are subject to a $2.50 one way fare unless they are a veteran, a Modesto Junior College student, are eighteen years or under, or are a City or County employee; all of whom may use the service for free.
Despite featuring fewer transportation options than major hubs such as Modesto or Stockton, Oakdale’s transportation services are comparable to surrounding jurisdictions and there is no noted disparity in access to transportation services throughout Oakdale. 488
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Figure 16
StanRTA Route 60 Bus Route Map
Source: StanRTA
489
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.4.5 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND JOB ACCESS
The TCAC Opportunity Maps account depicts differences in access to opportunities between geographic areas. The Economic Domain score factors in various indicators to generate the scores for each census tract or rural block group. These indicators encompass the following aspects: poverty, which measures the proportion of the population with an income level above the 200% of the federal poverty line; adult education, indicating the percentage of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher; employment, considering the percentage of adults aged 20-64 who are engaged in either the civilian labor force or the armed forces; job proximity, which evaluates the number of jobs occupied by individuals without a bachelor's degree within a designated radius of each census tract; and median home value, reflecting the value of owneroccupied housing units.
A score of greater than 0.8, depicted in dark green below, is viewed as a more positive economic outcome. As shown in Figure 15, there are a range of economic outcomes in Oakdale. Northwestern Oakdale has an economic domain score of 0.53. Eastern Oakdale has a score of 0.27, which represents less positive economic outcomes, and southwestern Oakdale has a score of 0.6, representing more positive economic outcomes. Program 3-6 is included to address disparate economic outcomes between block groups and support neighborhood improvements and economic development strategies in the context of the new and existing housing stock.
Figure 17
TCAC Opportunity Map Economic Scores by Census Tract, 2023 Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer
5.4.6 HOUSING THE WORKFORCE
To effectively plan to meet future housing needs of the workforce, it is necessary to analyze employment and population trends. According to the Stanislaus County Demographic and Employment Forecast, Oakdale is projected to experience steady 490
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
population and job growth from 2020 to 2050, with the fastest growth rate occurring between 2020 and 2025.
Table 11
Projected Change in Jobs and Population in Oakdale, 2020-2050 Year Population % Change Jobs % Change
2020 22,862 - 8,256 -
2025 24,390 6.7% 8,912 7.9%
2030 25,237 3.5% 8,937 0.3%
2035 25,994 3.0% 8,968 0.3%
2040 26,919 3.6% 9,005 0.4%
2045 27,965 3.9% 9,135 1.4%
2050 29,066 3.9% 9,276 1.5%
Total +6,204 +24.6% +1,020 +11.8%
Source: https://www.stancog.org/DocumentCenter/View/178/2021-StanislausCounty-Demographic-and-Employment-Forecast-PDF?bidId= Figure 16 highlights the commuting patterns of employed individuals within Oakdale and the surrounding areas. As exemplified below, Oakdale has a high number of workers commuting out of than into the City. This trend is accompanied by a low proportion of residents who are employed within the City itself.
Figure 18
Inflow and Outflow of Workers in Oakdale
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap, 2021
491
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
As depicted in Figure 17, there are 6 subsidized housing developments in Oakdale and 13 public housing facilities. The following are subsidized housing developments in Oakdale:
• Oakridge Apartments, 40 affordable units
• Garden Apartments, 41 affordable units
• Oakdale Apartments, 41 affordable units
• Oak Leaf Meadows, 55 affordable units
• Oak Haven, 16 affordable units
• Heritage Oaks, 49 affordable units
Figure 19
Map of Existing Affordable Housing Projects
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer 492
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.5 DISPROPORTIONATE HOUSING NEEDS AND DISPLACEMENT
5.5.1 COST BURDEN AND SEVERE COST BURDEN
Housing cost burden refers to the proportion of an individual or household's gross income dedicated to housing expenses. It is measured with a threshold of 30 percent for “cost burden” and 50 percent for “severe cost burden,” highlighting the impact of housing costs on a household’s finances. These households are said to be “overpaying” for their housing. Some of the implications of a high cost burden include housing-induced poverty, where overspending on housing leaves households little financial resources for other expenditures, and reduced savings which can impact asset accumulation.
According to the American Community Survey 5-Year Estimate (2018-2022), the median gross rent in Oakdale was $1,393. To rent a typical unit in Oakdale without cost burden, a household would need to have an income of at least $55,720.
Figure 20
Overpayment by Renters, 2021
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer Home prices in California have skyrocketed in the last decade; however, most homeowners have mortgages with fixed rates and are therefore less likely to be impacted by market increases. In contrast, renters are subject to rent increases based on market rates and tend to experience more cost-burden. For Oakdale renters in the central and eastern portion of the City, 40-60% are either cost-burdened or severely costburdened. In northeastern Oakdale, less than 40% of homeowners are cost-burdened or severely cost-burdened. However, 40-60% of homeowners in the southeastern and northwestern areas of the City are cost-burdened or severely cost-burdened while less than 40% of renters are cost-burdened or severely cost-burdened in northwestern Oakdale.
493
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Table 12
Housing Cost as a Percentage of Household Income
Owner-Occupied Units
Income Range Total
Households
% of Total
Households
0-20% of
Household
Income
20-29% of
Household
Income
30-34+% of
Household
Income
$0-19,999 129 0.16% 0 0 129
$20,000-34,999 463 0.56% 145 81 237
$35,000-49,999 582 0.70% 157 67 358
$50,000- $74,999 663 0.79% 171 145 247
$75,000+ 3,507 42.29% 2,131 903 473
Subtotal 5,267 63.51% 2,604 1,196 1,444
Renter-Occupied Units
Income Range Total
Households
% of Total
Households
0-20% of
Household
Income
20-29% of
Household
Income
30-34+% of
Household
Income
$0-19,999 858 10.35% 0 51 807
$20,000-34,999 329 0.39% 12 11 306
$35,000-49,999 372 0.45% 0 76 296
$50,000- $74,999 234 0.28% 78 123 33
$75,000+ 1,060 12.80% 667 336 57
Subtotal 3,026 36.49% 757 597 1,499
Total 8,293 100% 3,361 1,793 2,943
Source: U.S. Census American Community Survey B25106, 2022.
Note: Some households are not accounted for; therefore, figures may differ slightly for other U.S.
Census estimates for total households.
494
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
A family of four with a household income of $50,550 or less was considered extremely low income (ELI) in 2022. Using the table above, an estimated 90% of ELI renter households are cost burdened and approximately 62% of ELI owner-occupied households are cost burdened.
As identified in Table 10, approximately 27% of owner-occupied households and nearly 50% of renter-occupied households are cost burdened. In 2022, a family of four with a household income of $67,500 or less was considered lower income. Using the table above and assuming half of the households earning between $50,000-$74,999 earn $67,500 or less, an estimated 85% of lower income renter households are cost burdened and 56% of lower income owner-occupied households are cost burdened.
Figure 21
Overpayment by Homeowners, 2021
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer The median gross rent in Oakdale is 3.1 and 13.4 percent lower than both Stanislaus and San Joaquin County, respectively. Despite rents being lower, some households in Oakdale are still rent-burdened and overpaying for housing.
Table 13
Median Gross Rent, 2018-2022
Oakdale Stanislaus County San Joaquin County
Median Gross Rent $1,393 $1,436 $1,608
Source: U.S. Census American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
5.5.2 OVERCROWDING
Households where the number of occupants per room falls between 1.01 and 1.5 are considered to be overcrowded. Households with a ratio exceeding 1.51 persons per room are designated as being severely overcrowded. The calculation of persons per room excludes spaces such as bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, and half-rooms. This method of assessing residential overcrowding not only sheds light on living conditions but 495
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
also holds implications for demographic and socioeconomic contexts. Studies have shown that overcrowding is linked to an elevated risk of contracting communicable diseases, a higher prevalence of respiratory illnesses, and a heightened vulnerability to homelessness. In Oakdale, there are 202 overcrowded units.
Table 14
Occupants per Room for Households by Race and Ethnicity in Oakdale, 2022 Race or Ethnicity Total
Households
# Units with 1.00 or
Fewer Occupants
Per Room
# Units with 1.01 or
More Occupants
Per Room
Total Non-Institutionalized
Population 8,407 8,205 202
White Alone, Not Hispanic or
Latino 5,971 5,879 92
Black or African American Alone 142 127 15
Asian Alone 194 186 8
Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 2,100 2,013 87
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Table B25014A-I, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, 2022 Data concerning severe overcrowding by race and ethnicity is not available, but there is data on severe overcrowding by housing tenure. In Oakdale, seven owner-occupied units are overcrowded and 12 renter-occupied units are overcrowded.
Table 15
Severe Overcrowding for Households by Tenure in Oakdale, 2022 Tenure Total Households
# Units with 1.00 or
Fewer Occupants
Per Room
# Units with 1.01 to 1.50
Occupants
Per Room
# Units with 1.50 or
More Occupants
Per Room
OwnerOccupied 5,267 5,178 82 7
RenterOccupied 3,026 2,915 99 12
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Table B25014, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, 2021 According to the AFFH Data Viewer, under 4% of total households within the City are overcrowded. Between 1.19% and 1.80% of all households in the Northwest, Southwest, and Southeast census tracts are overcrowded. 3.92% of households within the Northeast 496
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
census tract are considered overcrowded, roughly 118% higher than the rest of the City, but still significantly lower than the County average of 6.63%.
5.5.3 SUBSTANDARD HOUSING
As outlined by the U.S. Census, substandard housing issues can be categorized into two types: (1) Residences lacking amenities like hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet, and a bathtub or shower; and (2) Homes where kitchen facilities are deficient, such as the absence of a sink with piped water, a stove or range, or a refrigerator.
Table 16
Substandard Housing Issues in Oakdale and Stanislaus County, 2022 Oakdale
(2010)
Oakdale
(2022)
Stanislaus County
(2010)
Stanislaus County
(2022)
Owner Renter Owner Renter Owner Renter Owner Renter
Lacking Complete
Kitchen 24 0 0 125 400 1676 250 1145
Lacking Plumbing 14 26 69 111 386 939 216 324
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Tables B25049, B25053, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, 2010, 2022
As shown in Figure 22 and Figure 23, housing units lacking complete plumbing and kitchen facilities are concentrated in northeastern Oakdale.
Figure 22
Housing Units Lacking Complete Plumbing, Oakdale
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer 497
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Figure 23
Housing Units Lacking Complete Kitchen, Oakdale
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer Figure 24 depicts the percent of total units built prior to 1960. In the majority of Oakdale, zero to 20 percent of housing units were built prior to 1960. In northwestern Oakdale, 20 to 40 percent of units were built prior to 1960, making the housing stock in that portion of the City older.
Figure 24
Age of Structures, Oakdale
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer
5.5.4 DISPLACEMENT
Shifts in neighborhood composition are often framed and perpetuated by established patterns of racial inequity and segregation. Neighborhood change is influenced by three processes: movement of people; public policies; and investments, such as capital improvements, planned transit stops, and flows of private capital. These processes can 498
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
disproportionally impact people of color, as well as lower income households, persons with disabilities, large households, and persons at-risk or experiencing homelessness. They can also cause displacement and homelessness.
Displacement in this case refers to the involuntary relocation of a household due to actions taken by landlords or shifts in the market. Displacement is driven by a combination of increasing housing costs, income inequality, stagnant wages, and an inadequate production of housing at market rates. Decades of disinvestment in lowincome communities can result in rent gaps, or disparities between current rental income and potentially achievable rental income if the property is converted to its most profitable use. Consequently, market forces and speculative investment can contribute to the occurrence of displacement.
The University of California, Berkeley (UCB) Urban Displacement Project Bay Area Model 2020 identifies Oakdale as Lower Displacement Risk for all households. The surrounding areas of Stockton and Modesto are identified as At-Risk of Displacement, Elevated Displacement, and High Displacement for all households. The level of displacement is the same for households across all income levels.
Figure 25
Displacement Risk for All Households, 2022
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer Natural disasters can also cause displacement. Figure 24 and Figure 25 identify areas that are at risk of flooding. In Oakdale, there is one area with a 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard that runs through the northernmost border of the City, which is also known as a 100-year flood or base flood. These floods have a 1 percent chance of being equalled or exceeded in any given year.
499
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Figure 26
Special Flood Hazard Areas in Oakdale, 2022
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer Figure 27
Special Flood Hazard Areas in the Greater Oakdale Area, 2022 Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer 500
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.5.5 HOMELESSNESS
The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines homelessness as any “individual or family who lacks a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence,” or an individual whose “primary nighttime residence [is] not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation… including a car, park, abandoned building, bus or train station, airport, or camping ground.” This also includes those at risk of being homeless, those fleeing domestic violence, those who have no other residence, and those who lack the resources to obtain permanent housing. HUD defines a ‘‘chronically homeless’’ individual as “a homeless individual with a disability [who has been homeless] … continuously for at least twelve (12) months or on at least four (4) separate occasions in the last three (3) years, where the combined occasions total a length of time of at least twelve (12) months.”
In Oakdale, there is no existing emergency shelter housing. Emergency shelters are located in the surrounding jurisdictions of Manteca, Tracy and Modesto.
Figure 28
Emergency Shelter Housing, 2021
Source: California Housing and Community Development, AFFH 2.0 Data Viewer
5.6 CONTRIBUTING FACTORS AND HOUSING PROGRAMS
Data and analysis compiled in this Fair Housing Assessment identified potential challenges to fair housing and to equal access to affordable housing throughout the City, including the following:
1. Lack of language access
2. Land use and zoning laws
3. Community opposition
4. Lack of resources for fair housing agencies and organizations 501
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.6.1 RANKING OF CONTRIBUTING FACTORS
Contributing factors are the factors that create, contribute to, perpetuate, or increase the severity of fair housing issues, including the following factors identified.
5.6.2 CONTRIBUTING FACTORS AND PROGRAM ACTIONS
The following Programs will be implemented to address these prioritized fair housing issues and contributing factors (ranked by highest, high, and moderate priority):
Table 17
Fair Housing Issues, Contributing Factors, and Program Actions Lack of
language
access
(Highest
Priority)
Program 4-3(A): Bilingual HCV Information
Program 4-3(B): Bilingual Tenant/Landlord Rights Toolkit Program 4-3(E): Bilingual Rental Agreements in City-Assisted Developments Program 4-4(C): Bilingual Tenant Relocation Assistance Information Program 6-1(C): Bilingual Energy Efficiency Outreach
Program 6-1(D): Bilingual Energy Conservation Outreach
Land use and
zoning laws
(High
Priority)
Program 1-1: Zoning for A Variety of Housing Types
• (A): Permanent Supportive Housing
• (B): Low Barrier Navigation Centers
• (C): Employee Housing
• (D): Accessory Dwelling Units
• (E): Residential Care Facilities
• (F): Manufactured Homes
• (G): Family Housing
Program 2-3: Accessory Dwelling Units
Program 3-2: Accessible & Transparent Development Application Information & Standards
502
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Community
opposition
(Moderate
Priority)
Program 3-1: Removal of Constraints
Program 3-2: Accessible & Transparent Development Application Information & Standards
Lack of
resources for
fair housing
agencies and
organizations
(Moderate
Priority)
Program 4-2: Equal Housing Opportunity
Program 4-3: Removal of Impediments to Fair Housing
Program 4-5: Housing Choice Vouchers
Program 4-6: Reasonable Accommodation
Program 5-1: Farmworker Housing
5.6.3 HOUSING PROGRAMS AND AFFH CONSIDERATIONS
The Housing Programs outlined in Section 2 address a variety of fair housing issues and opportunities, including housing mobility, the provision of new housing opportunities in areas of higher opportunity, place-based strategies for community revitalization, antidisplacement measures, and outreach and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that the City is proactively engaging the community to access these programs. Each program includes metrics that the City will use throughout the planning period to measure its success in affirmatively furthering fair housing.
In order to affirmatively further fair housing, an agency will ensure that actions within its jurisdiction avoid perpetuating patterns of segregation, and actively support integration.
Most programs have citywide geographic targeting designations due to the small size of Oakdale – 23,181 residents as of 2020. Yet in comparison to the region, Oakdale has a comparatively high resource designation, and regional efforts can support the greater Oakdale community moving forward.
503
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Table 18
Fair Housing Issues, Contributing Factors, and Program Actions Action Area Key Program Specific
Commitments Timeline Geographic
Targeting
2023-2031 Metrics
Housing
Mobility
Program 4-3:
Removal of
Impediments
to Fair
Housing
Provide fair housing
information,
conduct outreach,
host/participate in
Housing Resource
Fair, include
bilingual rental
agreements,
partner with
regional
organizations.
Ongoing,
with
deliverables
beginning
in 2025.
Citywide,
including
neighborhoods
and
subdivisions
with
Covenants,
Conditions &
Restrictions
(CC&Rs).
Educate renters,
homeowners, and
landlords on fair housing
laws and resources
available to promote
increased housing
stability, fair housing
practices, and
affirmatively further fair
housing.
Place-Based
Strategies for
Community
Revitalization
Program:
Neighborhood
Improvements
Capital
Improvement Plan
(CIP) prioritization
of moderateresource areas and
prioritize affordable
housing for water
and sewer.
Annually,
and within
60 days of
Housing
Element
adoption.
Citywide,
emphasizing
neighborhoods
with aging
housing stock
and
infrastructure.
Support at least three
capital improvement
projects in areas of
highest need.
Displacement
Program 4-4:
AntiDisplacement
Actions
Require
replacement
housing units,
provide bilingual
information, assess
tenant relocation
provisions, and
apply for
rehabilitation
funding.
Ongoing,
with
deliverables
ranging
from March
30, 2025 to
December
31, 2031.
Citywide,
including
affordable
housing
developments.
Maintain and rehabilitate
three single-family
residences and ten trailers
of the existing housing
stock, require code
compliance for rental
units, monitor the
affordability of all local
affordable units, and
ensure tenants are paid
relocation payments for
no-fault just cause.
Outreach &
Enforcement
Program 4-1:
Housing
Outreach and
Stakeholder
Engagement
Survey, meetings,
partnership,
marketing
materials, and
religious institution
outreach.
Ongoing,
with
deliverables
beginning
in 2025.
Regional,
including
developers
active in San
Joaquin and
Stanislaus.
Secure funding and
monitor the effectiveness
of programs, procedures,
and incentives.
504
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.6.4 LOCAL DATA AND KNOWLEDGE
The Contributing Factors and the Fair Housing Assessment as a whole are largely informed by Federal and State data. In addition to these quantitative data sources, local data and knowledge provide a holistic assessment of fair housing issues to inform the City’s fair housing analysis and program actions. The following table addresses and summarizes key issues highlighted by the State Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD) in the May 2024 publication, A Guide for Incorporating Local Data and Knowledge.
Table 19
Local Data and Knowledge of Fair Housing Issues in Oakdale Action Area Criteria Question Response
Segregation and
Integration
Race
Any areas or
neighborhoods
considered to be
concentrated minority
communities?
Households in Oakdale are generally
integrated, with higher racial
segregation noted in Northwest
Oakdale.
Are any areas known to
have particularly low
concentrations of
minority residents?
Oakdale is primarily populated by
White and Latino residents with no
prominent geographic
concentrations of racial minorities.
Are there any known
historic factors that have
led to these patterns?
Are there current factors
that reinforce these
patterns? Are there any
factors that are changing
these patterns over time?
Block groups with higher
proportions of new construction
have a slight correlation with more
disproportionately White
population.
Disability
Any areas or
neighborhoods with
concentrations of
persons with disabilities?
Northeast Oakdale (Census Tract
2.04) has a 22% disability rate,
compared to 8-12% in the City’s
remaining tracts.
Any concentrations of
group homes or
residential care facilities?
Residential care facilities and group
homes are generally distributed
throughout Oakdale.
Have there been any
permits issued for
construction of ramp or
other accessibility
modifications to homes in
the area?
No known recent requests for
accessibility modifications.
Reasonable accommodations are
provided over the counter at no
charge. See Section 2, Program 4-6
(Reasonable Accommodation).
Have any requests for
reasonable
accommodation been
made during the last
planning period?
505
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Segregation and
Integration
(cont.)
Disability
(cont.)
Any locational differences
in terms of disabilities?
Recent accessibility
improvements? Areas in
need of improvements?
Older neighborhoods generally
require greater infill improvements
to ensure amenities (such as ADAcompliant sidewalks) serve Oakdale residents with ambulatory
disabilities.
Familial Status
Any areas or
neighborhoods with
concentrations of
families? Non-families or
smaller homes?
No known concentrations of
families, non-families or smaller
homes.
Any child care facilities?
Any locational
differences?
Child care facilities and schools are
generally integrated throughout
Oakdale.
Income
Any areas of the
community that are
considered to be lowerincome, high-poverty
areas?
The City’s four lowest income block
groups are located in each of the
four quadrants of the City, and
generally comprise the older
housing stock surrounding the
downtown core of Oakdale.
Any areas of the
community that are
considered to be higherincome areas?
Newer neighborhoods tend to be
correlated with higher median
incomes in Oakdale. Census Tract
2.01, Block Group 12 in Northwest
Oakdale has a median household
income above $200,000, more than
double the City average.1
Are there any known
areas where a lot of
HCV/Section 8 renters
live?
No known concentrations of renters
with Section 8 Housing Choice
Vouchers.
Any housing assisted by
public financing in the
city? If so, any areas of
the city with a
concentration of housing
assisted by public
financing?
The City contains existing deedrestricted affordable housing distributed throughout NW, NE, and
SE Oakdale.
Disparities in
Access to
Opportunity
Education
Discuss local schools and
geographic availability.
Full discussion in Sections 5.4.2
(Disparities – Education) and 5.7.6
(Sites by Access to Education).
Discuss local school
performance compared
to the region.
Per student achievement data,
Oakdale schools outperform the
County averages and are roughly on
par with the State averages for
1 See Section 5.7.1.
506
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Disparities in
Access to
Opportunity
(cont.)
Education
(cont.)
English Language Arts/Literacy and
Mathematics.
Discuss local
performance and any
differences in access to
education opportunities
from neighborhood to
neighborhood.
School achievement is roughly
equivalent across Oakdale
neighborhoods, with higher
achievement rates in elementary
and middle schools compared to
Oakdale High School.
Discuss any upper
education opportunities,
including vocational
opportunities.
No community colleges or
universities within Oakdale;
residents are located within
proximity to Modesto Junior College
and Stanislaus State.
Discuss any trends and
past and current local
efforts to improve access
to education
opportunities.
Oakdale continues to invest in
educational access as the City
grows. Oakdale Joint Unified School
District owns land in southwest
Oakdale to support current and
future residents with an additional
campus as determined necessary by
district facilities planning.
Do community members
have the opportunity to
select the schools that
their students attend, or
are schools assigned by
geography? Are there
private or charter options
in the community? If
families have the ability
to select schools, are
there higher-demand
schools in the
community?
Oakdale Charter School (7-12) offers
open enrollment to residents
citywide. Oakdale High School (9-12)
serves the full city. K-8 schools are
assigned by geography, with schools
outside of the neighborhood
requiring an intra-district transfer.
Are there any known
factors that influence the
current rates of high
school graduation or
college attendance?
No known factors of local
significance.
Are there any
organizations that
provide services like
tutoring that could help
to improve educational
outcomes? Any
differences between
neighborhoods in terms
of access?
No known factors of local
significance.
507
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Disparities in
Access to
Opportunity
(cont.)
Any new subdivisions?
New master planned
areas? Differences in
schools?
The City’s new subdivisions and
Specific Plan Areas are located on
the outskirts of Oakdale. As a result,
residents of new developments will
generally be distributed to
elementary and middle schools
throughout the City in a manner
that limits disparities in educational
access.
Economic
What are the major
employers in the area, or
major industries? Where
are they located?
Are there major
industries that are not
nearby that many
residents work in?
How has this changed
recently? Are there new
areas of the county that
have developed
commercial or industrial
uses? Or are there areas
that were previously job
centers that are no
longer in as high of use?
The largest employer in Oakdale is
Conagra Brands, Inc., located in
south Oakdale and listed as having
1,000-4,999 employees per the
California Economic Development
Department (EDD). Conagra’s
Oakdale operations primarily focus
on tomato-based canned goods, and
is surrounded in south Oakdale by
related agricultural production.
Agricultural and commercial areas
roughly follow historic trends and
are further defined by the major
thoroughfares running through
Oakdale.
The City remains culturally
significant as the Cowboy Capital of
the World, and the ranching
tradition of the region continues to
define the local economy.
Is high-speed internet
readily available in the
area? Do any areas have
known challenges with
cell signal access?
High-speed internet and cellular
data is readily available throughout
Oakdale with no known or
prominent disparities in access.
Are there any known
economic development
programs or initiatives
planned or in place that
might influence the jobs
landscape in the next ten
years?
Opportunity Stanislaus provides
economic development programs
countywide. The City participates in
the VOLT Institute, a workforce
training program for manufacturing
and technology. The Valley Sierra
Small Business Development Center
(SBDC) serves the Counties of
Stanislaus and Tuolumne. The
northern San Joaquin Valley is
undergoing steady expansion and
change that will continue to
508
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Disparities in
Access to
Opportunity
(cont.)
Economic
(cont.)
influence the economic trajectory of
the next decade.
Transportation
Discuss countywide
transportation system,
including different
modes.
Full discussion in Section 5.4.4
(Disparities – Transportation).
Discuss local access to
the countywide
transportation system,
such as routes and
locations.
Local transportation access includes
StanRTA Route 60 with thirteen
daily round trips to Modesto,
through Riverbank. Bus stops are
primarily located along the F Street
corridor, with service along A St
from 1st to 6th Ave. Dial-A-Ride
services are also available for the
general public.
Discuss any local efforts
to assist access to
different transportation
modes, including public
transit, walking and
biking.
The Housing Element includes
Program 6-3 (Transit-Housing
Balance) with the goal to locate new
housing and transportation
opportunities in proximity to each
other, while improving transit and
multimodal access for residents of
the existing housing stock in
Oakdale.
How do residents without
access to a car travel to
work or to access
resources like medical
care? Is this different
depending on the
industry that residents
work in?
Consistent with suburban
jurisdictions throughout California,
residents without access to a car
may experience higher bus
headways than in urban areas.
Agricultural employees in the
broader region may experience
pronounced difficulty traveling to
work without a personal vehicle due
to decentralized locations.
Any engineering reports
or assessments of capital
improvements? Any
differences between
neighborhoods?
The City’s Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) prioritizes roadway
deterioration, sidewalk gaps,
drainage deficiencies, accessibility
barriers, and streetscape conditions
in the City’s older neighborhoods.
What are the physical
conditions of local roads
The City’s pavement condition is
generally favorable, with some older
509
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Disparities in
Access to
Opportunity
(cont.)
Transportation
(cont.)
like? Are there street
lights, traffic lights, or
bike infrastructure in any
parts of the community?
areas with greater deterioration.
The City’s bike network is primarily
comprised of Class II bicycle lanes on
major arterials like Yosemite
Avenue, F Street, and G Street. Class
I bike infrastructure is primarily
located along the Stanislaus River,
with a Class I path connecting the
downtown to riparian parks from A
Street.
Are there known highcollision corridors or
areas of high traffic on a
regular basis?
State Route 120/Yosemite Avenue is
a major arterial; while it is of
regional significance, the traffic can
be significant at peak hours and
impact the experience of
pedestrians, drivers, and transitriders alike.
Any Safe Routes to
Schools plans or
programs in place?
Where in the community
are sidewalks available or
not available? Any
differences between
neighborhoods?
West F Street is the main arterial
with sidewalk gaps, along with
stretches of Highway 120 in the
City’s more industrial areas. The City
initiated southwest downtown
revitalization projects in 2025 with
the specific goal of improving safer
school access through pedestrian
infrastructure upgrades.
Any major community
facilities and any
differences in access
between neighborhoods?
The Gene Bianchi Community
Center serves as the City’s primary
public gathering facility. The
Stanislaus County Library branch,
also in downtown, is another major
community anchor. Cultural
institutions honoring Oakdale’s
history include the Oakdale Museum
& History Center and Oakdale
Cowboy Museum.
Any differences between
neighborhoods in terms
of access to
transportation options?
Biking? Walking?
Neighborhoods are primarily
defined by age, with newer
neighborhoods farther from key
amenities than older
neighborhoods, but with more
complete, ADA-accessible
infrastructure.
Have there been any
major infrastructure
investments in the recent
past? This can include,
but is not limited to,
In addition to the southwest
downtown revitalization projects,
the City continues to prioritize
projects from Stanislaus County
Measure L revenues, including ADA
510
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Disparities in
Access to
Opportunity
(cont.)
Transportation
(cont.)
roads, bridges, or
water/sewer
infrastructure. Are there
any major infrastructure
projects planned for the
next ten years?
improvements, wastewater capital
projects, roadway and active
transportation rehabilitation, and
park upgrades.
Environment
Any public safety reports
(e.g., water quality,
sewer, circulation)? Any
differences between
neighborhoods?
In addition to transportation and
capital improvement plans, the
City’s Storm Drain Master Plan
assesses storm infrastructure. Older
neighborhoods generally found in
need of most improvement.
Are there known major
sources of pollution in
the area? Where are they
located, if so? This could
include things like
industrial sources,
groundwater
contamination from
agriculture, or lead paint
exposure in older homes.
Are there places where
residential development
should be avoided due to
environmental
conditions, or where
existing environmental
conditions are negatively
effecting residents?
Localized pollution is generally
derived from industrial areas in
south Oakdale. Consistent with the
region, pesticide drift can also be a
broader factor in pollution
generated by agricultural activity.
Due to the industrial concentration
on the south end of Oakdale, the
City’s housing stock is located to the
north, west, and east of the City and
the City’s Housing Sites Inventory
reflects that need as well.
Do any neighborhoods
lack access to parks or
other outdoor spaces?
Are there other notable
community amenities,
and where are they? Any
differences between
neighborhoods in terms
of access?
Parks are located throughout the
City of Oakdale, with limited
disparities in residential
neighborhoods. The industrial areas
of southern Oakdale feature fewer
parks and recreation opportunities,
and the Stanislaus River along the
City’s northern edge is a major asset
with associated parks and recreation
amenities.
Are there any new
subdivisions or new
master planned areas?
Any differences in parks,
other amenities between
neighborhoods?
The City’s Specific Plan Areas include
new subdivisions, generally located
to the southwest and northeast
portions of Oakdale. These include
new parks to support new residents.
511
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Are there any differences
between neighborhoods
with respect to access to
shopping? Healthy foods?
The City’s larger grocery stores
(Raley’s, Save Mart, Grocery Outlet,
et al) are generally located in the
City’s eastern half.
Disproportionate
Housing Needs,
Including
Displacement
Overpayment
Any recent increases in
rents or sales prices? Any
differences between
neighborhoods? How
does that compare to
incomes in the area?
A majority of Oakdale residents
surveyed noted an increase in
housing costs over the last ten
years. No known significant
disparities by neighborhood.
Any patterns of evictions
or foreclosures between
neighborhoods?
No known disparate patterns of
evictions or foreclosures between
neighborhoods.
Overcrowding
Are there any areas that
are known to have higher
rates of household
overcrowding, such as
"doubling-up" families in
one house? Any
information from code
enforcement officers?
Older neighborhoods surrounding
the City’s central core tend to have
more overcrowding, as supported by
data and anecdotal accounts.
Housing
Conditions
Any areas of the City with
more or less units in need
of rehabilitation and
replacement?
Older neighborhoods surrounding
the City’s central core tend to have a
greater need for rehabilitation and
replacement, as supported by data
and anecdotal accounts.
Any differences in
housing conditions based
on unit types (single
family, multifamily,
mobilehome) and
locations?
Housing conditions are generally
consistent across housing type, and
more closely correlated with age of
structures.
Are there any known
areas where the physical
conditions of housing
suggest a high need for
rehabilitation for safety
or accessibility reasons?
The City has limited homes found in
need of demolition or substantial
rehabilitation for habitability
reasons.
Have there been any
subdivisions developed in
the past ten years? If so,
how large were the lots
in these developments?
Are there differences
between new
subdivisions and older
areas? any new master
planned areas that have
Subdivisions developed within the
past ten years have generally
smaller lots than single-family
developments from the 20th century,
with larger homes. Prices are
roughly consistent for sale and
rental units throughout Oakdale.
512
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Disproportionate
Housing Needs,
Including
Displacement
(cont.)
Housing
Conditions
(cont.)
different infrastructure?
Differences in rents and
prices and locational
differences?
Are there any types of
housing that are known
to be not widely
available? If so, which
neighborhoods?
The City is predominated by singlefamily homes, with limited large multifamily development.
Are there any areas
where there have been a
high rate of code
enforcement complaints?
What were the issues
that drove the
complaint?
No known areas of disproportionate
code enforcement complaints.
Persons
Experiencing
Homelessness
Are there any areas
where homeless
community members
tend to congregate? This
could either be
encampment areas,
parking areas where
people who live in
vehicles park, or areas
where people congregate
during the day, such as
libraries, parks, or
community centers. If so,
is there access to
transportation, services
and programs?
Homeless encampments tend to be
concentrated seasonally along the
Stanislaus River. Services are
generally located within proximity to
the downtown core, and are roughly
accessible though less plentiful than
in larger population centers.
Any programs to provide
emergency rental
assistance? If so, how is
that assistance available?
Any differences between
neighborhoods?
The Stanislaus Regional Housing
Authority previously administered
an Emergency Rental Assistance
Program (ERAP) during the COVID19 pandemic. No known disparities in access by neighborhood.
Displacement
Any areas or
neighborhoods that have
experienced significant
increases in rents and
sales prices? Are people
moving or evicted as a
result?
A majority of Oakdale residents
surveyed noted an increase in
housing costs over the last ten
years. No known significant
disparities by neighborhood.
Any local events that led
to displacement?
No known local events exacerbating
displacement.
513
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Disproportionate
Housing Needs,
Including
Displacement
(cont.)
Displacement
(cont.)
Do any areas have a
higher percentage of
housing with higher
susceptibility to
environmental damage
due to building age or
design?
The City’s older neighborhoods in
the central core are more likely to
have homes in need of rehabilitation
or repair due to age.
Are defensible space
inspections performed?
Any other similar
environmental hazard
prevention
programming?
The City adheres to building code
requirements for defensible space.
The City also participates in the
Stanislaus County Office of
Emergency Services (OES) planning
and activities for disaster
preparedness, response, and
mitigation.
Are there any areas that
might not be in a FEMA
zone but which might
have a tendency to
experience flash floods
during storms due to a
lack of stormwater
infrastructure or ground
absorption/
permeability?
Oakdale slopes toward the
Stanislaus River, but is generally
protected from riparian flooding.
Oakdale soils are predominated by
sandy loams with adequate drainage
for groundwater recharge.
Anecdotal accounts note that
localized storm events are typically
associated with temporary flooding
following heavy rainfall.
Other Relevant Factors
Describe any historical
events, past populations,
waves of immigration and
development, redlining,
financial investments,
conditions, covenants
and restrictions that
influenced socioeconomic patterns.
Oakdale’s early development was
connected to the extension of the
Southern Pacific Railroad and
growing farming and ranching
activity in Stanislaus County.
Demographic shifts moving into the
21st century are largely typical of the
region, including greater racial
diversity with an increase in Hispanic
and Latino residents and inland
migration patterns fueled by rising
housing costs in the Bay Area.
Describe any past zoning
or land use decisions that
influenced socioeconomic patterns.
Broadly, trends of suburbanization
and single-family zoning have
shaped Oakdale in a manner similar
to comparable jurisdictions
throughout California and the
nation. The existing housing stock
exhibits a greater variety of housing
types closer to the downtown core
that are more accessible to
residents of a variety of incomes.
Describe any settlement
trends, major
developments or
population trends that
influenced socioeconomic patterns.
514
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Other Relevant Factors (cont.)
Does the city have any
defining features to the
land use pattern?
Topography, Railroads?
Highways? Major
roadways? Does that
influence socio-economic
patterns?
The City sits at a crossroads of two
major throughfares. The northsouth arterial, Yosemite Avenue, starts as Highway 120 from the
north until the City’s historic
downtown at F Street. Highway 108
(F Street) runs from Riverbank to the
west through Oakdale, and
continues east from the central core
as Highway 120 into the foothills of
the Sierra Nevada.
The two major roadways create
quadrants within the City of Oakdale
(NW, SW, NE, SE). These are
identified as metrics throughout the
Fair Housing Assessment to identify
patterns of integration, disparity,
and access.
Freight rail runs through Oakdale to
the west, east and south, supporting
the local agricultural and industrial
economy.
Any recent engineering
reports, assessments of
infrastructure supply or
quality, public safety
reports, capital
improvement program?
Does this information
describe or show any
differences?
The City’s five-year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) runs
from FY 2025-26 to FY 2030-31. The
CIP describes the Southwest
Downtown Revitalization and Safe
Routes to School Project as
addressing long-standing
underinvestment and severe
infrastructure deterioration in the
southwest downtown area. The
project focuses on First, Second, and
Third Avenues between H Street,
Church Street, and J Street.
515
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.7 FAIR HOUSING AND HOUSING SITES
5.7.1 SEGREGATION AND INTEGRATION
Housing sites identified to meet Oakdale’s RHNA are distributed throughout the community in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing. Oakdale contains areas designated as Highest Resource, High Resource, and Moderate Resource, and sites are primarily distributed throughout these Highest and High Resource areas, are not concentrated by income, and are supported by fair housing programs and the sites inventory. The following table includes analysis of sites by location within Oakdale with relation to fair housing indicators including neighborhood segregation, access to opportunity, and displacement risk. The City’s northwestern tract and westerly annexation areas exhibit high white segregation (Figure 29), with limited data for the City’s eastern tracts.
The block groups with the highest quantity of sites include the Crane Crossing Specific Plan Area (Census Tract 2.01, Block Group 21), and the East F Street Specific Plan Area (Census Tract 2.05, Block Group 52). Both block groups are in Highest and High Resource Areas, and development is supported by the Specific Plan study supports development feasibility of higher-density affordable housing. This concentration does not exacerbate patterns of segregation and locates lower income, moderate income, and abovemoderate income development capacity in a manner promoting integrated, mixedincome communities.
Figure 29
Racial Segregation/Integration by Tract, 2020
516
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Table 20
Distribution of RHNA Capacity by Census Tract/Block Group & AFFH Indicators Census
Block
Group
Census
Tract
RHNA Capacity
AFFH Indicators
Segregation & Integration Access to Opportunity Displacement Risk Number
of Sites
VLI
LI
MI AMI
Median
Household
Income
Neighborhood
Segregation
Typologies
2020
LatinoWhite
Pop.
(%)
Disability
Rate
(%)
TCAC
Resource
Area
Econ.
Score
Env.
Score
Edu.
Score
Overcrowding
Rate (%)
Overpayment
Rate, Renter
(%)
Overpayment
Rate, Owner
(%)
1 1.02
(W)
2 155 0 0 $76,964 High White
Segregation 23/68 8.80 High 0.46 0.54 0.50 0.00 32.37 45.97 11 2.01
(NW)
15 60 140 228 $92,944
High White
Segregation 23/68 11.76
Highest
0.63 0.58 0.61 1.19 48.78 37.74
12 0 0 0 0 $211,902 Highest
13 0 0 0 0 $53,261 Moderate
14 2 58 0 16 No Data High
15 2 92 0 0 $67,593 Moderate
21 2.02
(SW)
0 0 0 0 $50,558
LowMedium
Segregation
32/57 8.88
High
0.49 0.56 0.52 1.77 68.10 42.75
22 0 0 0 0 No Data Moderate
23 3 181 0 0 $83,173 High
24 0 0 0 0 $123,409 Highest
41 2.04
(NE)
1 32 0 0 $54,712
Limited
Data 31/60 22.31
Moderate
42 2 32 12 0 $105,072 Moderate 0.67 0.60 0.65 3.92 61.51 42.63 43 1 50 0 0 $93,750 Highest
51 2.05
(SE)
0 0 0 0 $41,338 Limited
Data 36/55 12.72
Moderate
0.43 0.51 0.46 1.80 54.79 48.00
52 19 220 146 148 $96,875 High
Note: Census Tract 1.02 includes annexed sites, and most of the tract is located outside of City limits. 517
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Table 21
Realistic Capacity of Non-Vacant Sites by Zone
Zone RHNA Site Capacity
PD 51
R-1 16
R-2 459
R-3 117
Total 643
Table 20 indicates the realistic capacity of non-vacant sites by zone. All non-vacant sites are zoned for residential development, and units included in inventory within a Planned Development (PD) zone allow housing by-right. A majority of the City’s lower-income RHNA is facilitated on vacant sites, and distribution of non-vacant sites throughout zoning districts does not exacerbate fair housing conditions in Oakdale.
Sites are located within each of the City’s Census tracts, but some specific block groups do not contain sites within the Housing Element inventory. This omission is largely due to the absence of suitable vacant or underutilized sites within the block group to accommodate RHNA. Block groups with no inventoried sites include two (2) Highest Resource areas with limitations on areas assessed for accommodation of the City’s RHNA:
• Census Tract 2.01, Block Group 12: Comprised mostly of existing single-family neighborhoods along River Avenue, and land within the City’s sphere of influence not yet annexed by the City, referenced as Future Specific Plan Area 2. • Census Tract 2.02, Block Group 24: Comprised mostly of the built-out Bridle Ridge subdivision. A large vacant parcel within this block group is owned by the Oakdale Unified School District, and slated for potential future school expansion to accommodate anticipated growth. The easterly portions of the block group abut the City’s heavy industrial uses likely unsuitable for housing development.
Program 1-6 (Missing Middle Housing) is included in the Housing Strategy (Section 2) to promote the development of small lot subdivisions on applicable lots, potentially including vacant portions of large lots with existing structures on remainder parcels. This program can support the development of housing in Highest Resource Areas with limited land availability to promote ongoing integration of Oakdale’s neighborhoods.
The City’s RHNA is accommodated in higher-resource growth geographies with feasible pathways to development, and supported by programs to ensure that development standards and finance proactively pursue integrated housing at all levels of affordability throughout Oakdale. The Sites Inventory intentionally and affirmatively furthers fair housing, and does not exacerbate existing patterns of segregation. 518
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.7.2 RACIALLY AND ETHNICALLY CONCENTRATED AREAS OF
POVERTY
There are no racially/ethnically concentrated areas of poverty or racially concentrated areas of affluence within Oakdale.
5.7.3 DISPROPORTIONATE HOUSING NEEDS INCLUDING
DISPLACEMENT
Risk of displacement and cost burden are highest amongst low-income renter households. The location of housing sites will not exacerbate these conditions, and programs are included to address this need, including Program 4-4: Anti-Displacement Actions.
5.7.4 DISPARITIES IN ACCESS TO OPPORTUNITY
There are minimal disparities in access to opportunity by protected class and income throughout Oakdale. Sites on the southern end of the City are located in a Moderate Resource Area. Program 2-1: Neighborhood Improvements is included to support infrastructure improvements in Moderate Resource areas and adjacent to new developments.
5.7.5 IMPROVED AND EXACERBATED CONDITIONS
The identified housing sites are spread throughout the City and sites with capacity for lower-income housing are not concentrated in areas with a high concentration of existing affordable housing. Oakdale’s sites are primarily located within High and Highest Resource Areas, higher than the most neighboring jurisdictions in both San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties. Additionally, fair housing conditions are not exacerbated by the housing development anticipated within the 2023 Housing Element.
5.7.6 SITES BY ACCESS TO EDUCATION
Sites are distributed throughout Oakdale with access to a variety of public schools. As noted in the following table, elementary schools are located in all quadrants of the City apart from the southwest, which includes a district-owned site that may be used for a future campus. The rate of English learners, free/reduced-price lunch eligible students, and ethnic diversity index of Oakdale schools was roughly equivalent. The greatest disparity was noted in English learners, ranging from Oakdale Charter (1.8%) to Sierra View Elementary (16.1%). A majority of had a wide variety of languages of English learners represented in Oakdale Unified schools, with a supermajority of students speaking Spanish but inclusive of Arabic, Assyrian, Baltic languages, Cantonese, Danish, French, Hindi, Hmong, Italian, Khmer, Lao, Mandarin, Philippine languages (e.g., Cebuano, Tagalog), Portuguese, Punjabi, Serbo-Croatian (Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian) and Turkish. 519
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
Table 22
Demographics by Campus, Oakdale Unified School District School Grades Quadrant English Learners Free/Reduced Price Lunch Eligible (%)
Ethnic Diversity
Index
Fair Oaks K-6
NW
9.6% 36.9% 40
Magnolia K-6 10.7% 49.4% 41
Oakdale High 9-12 SW 6.2% 34.7% 39
Cloverland K-6
NE
12.5% 46.1% 40
Oakdale
Charter 7-12 1.8% 37.5% 40
Sierra View K-6
SE
16.1% 46.0% 40
Oakdale
Junior High 7-8 9.5% 38.3% 40
5.7.7 SITES BY ACCESS TO HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT
As noted in Section 5.4.3 (Access to Healthy Environment), sites are distributed throughout the Oakdale community in a manner that affirmatively furthers fair housing by locating sites away from environmental hazards, with key indicators addressed in a variety of programs including place-based improvements.
Environmental justice considerations in Oakdale are associated with traffic corridors, pesticide drift, and particulate matter. Proximity to freight or regional roadway networks may disproportionately affect some neighborhoods. The California Environmental Protection Agency uses CalEnviroScreen to identify communities experiencing cumulative environmental burdens, combining pollution exposure and socioeconomic vulnerability indicators. Oakdale does not contain Disadvantaged Urban Communities (DUCs) identified under statewide environmental justice thresholds. Programs address neighborhood-level disparities related to air quality, heat exposure, tree canopy, and infrastructure investment. Sites are located away from heavy industrial uses and major arterials wherever possible given the City’s available land, and the inventory does not exacerbate disproportionate access to healthy environmental conditions.
Program 6-2 (Place-Based Strategies) includes program actions to address climate change impacts through investments in adaptation measures such as urban forestry and low-impact development improvements in disadvantaged areas. Program 6-2 further contains actions to engage with community members and pursue funding to facilitate the establishment of community spaces and recreation opportunities, such as parks, trails, and bike paths.
520
City of Oakdale 2023-2031 Housing Element
5.7.8 SITES BY ACCESS TO TRANSPORTATION
As noted in Section 5.4.4 (Transportation), public transportation opportunities within Oakdale are typical of suburban contexts and connect Oakdale residents with the broader region. The location of sites does not exacerbate existing transportation conditions. Prioritizing sidewalk infill, shaded streetscapes, bicycle connectivity, traffic calming, park reinvestment, and Safe Routes to School improvements can help reduce neighborhood-level disparities and improve access. Sites are generally located in newer areas of the City with planned infrastructure and access to active transportation.
Consequently, program actions are focused on neighborhoods with aging infrastructure.
5.7.9 SITES BY ACCESS TO JOBS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
High rates of unemployment were noted in CalEnviroScreen data, with a disproportionately high rate in the Southwest, Southeast, and Northeast quadrants of Oakdale. Housing sites are generally distributed throughout Oakdale – including an emphasis in the Northwest quadrant with a higher rate of employment and the City’s highest median incomes – and are not anticipated to exacerbate or create economic development disparities within the City.
Figure 30
Median Household Income by Block Group, 2024
Source: U.S. Census, American Community Survey (ACS), B19013 521
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
Attachment 5
Oakdale Adoption Draft Housing Element Appendices
522
Adoption Draft
Appendices
June 2026
523
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 1
APPENDIX A
This section outlines the City’s progress toward achieving its 5th Cycle Housing Element programs, including lessons learned and information about specific populations served, where available. This evaluation of the effectiveness of the 5th Cycle Programs which informed the identification of new and modified programs for the 6th Cycle Housing Element. A summary of the City's overall progress in achieving its 5th Cycle programs is provided at the end.
Table A1: 2019 Housing Element Program Implementation Status Program Timeframe Progress and Lessons Learned Status
Program 1.1 Capacity to
Accommodate Regional Need
Review the City’s General Plan
and Specific Plans’ residential
holding capacity and vacant land
inventory to ensure an adequate
supply of land is available and,
when necessary, annex land
adjacent to existing corporate
boundaries to meet local and
regional housing needs.
Annually
Successfully Implemented. In
September 2015, the City annexed
the Crane Crossing Specific Plan
which annexed 98.66 acres for 353
units. Annexation of the Sierra Pointe
Specific Plan area was approved by
City Council in March 2025. At
approximately 297 acres, the Specific
Plan will provide approximately 901
dwelling units.
Portion related to
annexations has
been completed
and will not be
carried forward.
The City will
continue to
maintain adequate
sites for housing
(see below).
Program 1.2 Adequate Sites for
All Housing Types and Income
Groups
Identify and maintain an adequate
supply of residential land with
appropriate zoning and land use
designations to support all housing
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully implemented. The City’s
2030 General Plan provides for over
15,500 dwelling units. Program
should be expanded to ensure that
the housing site inventory is
maintained throughout the planning
period and to address no net loss.
Program will be
continued and
expanded to
include zoning for
new housing types
and to maintain an
adequate
524
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 2 types and income groups including
extremely low-, low-, very low-,
moderate-, and above-moderate.
inventory
throughout the
planning period.
Program 1.3 Manufactured
Housing/Mobile Homes
Allow manufactured housing/mobile
homes in all residential districts
provided the manufactured
housing/mobile home meets the same
standards as conventional housing
and is placed on a permanent
foundation, and continue to permit the
temporary use of mobile homes for
medical circumstances in both
residential and commercial zones.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully Implemented. Zoning
Code Section 36-18.24 allows
manufactured homes built after 1976
by right in all residential districts on
permanent foundations. Subject to the
same standards as conventional
housing. Wood siding and standard
roof overhangs are required. 36-
18.22. H. allows the temporary use of
mobile homes for medical
circumstances.
This Program has
been codified and
the Program will
not be continued.
Program 1.4 Single-Room
Occupancy Units
Conduct a study to determine the
feasibility of preserving and
rehabilitating existing motels and/or
residential buildings in Oakdale
suitable for single-room occupancy
(SRO) units to support housing needs
for extremely low income households
in accordance with State law, and
provide incentives (e.g., reduced
developer fees, other fee discounts,
deferrals, and/or waivers) to assist
housing developers in constructing
and/or preserving SRO facilities.
2018 Not implemented.
This Program has
been continued
and revised to
address State law.
525
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 3 Program 1.5 Housing
Rehabilitation Program
Implement, promote, and encourage
the HOME and Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Consortium for rehabilitation of the
City’s older housing stock through City
outreach targeted at Oakdale’s older
neighborhoods (e.g., program
advertisement mailers) and providing
program information on the City’s
website (http://www.oakdalegov.com).
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully implemented. The City
continues to produce and promote
informational materials at the planning
department counter and website to
provide information about HOME and
Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Consortium for rehabilitation
of the City's older housing stock.
Program will be
continued.
Program 1.6 Housing Condition
Survey
The code enforcement officer will
maintain a list of substandard and
dilapidated housing units identified in
the course of his or her duties which
could benefit from rehabilitation
consistent with the requirements of
Health & Safety Code Sect. 17995.3
Not less than every
five (5) years
Successfully implemented. The City
Building staff provide Planning staff
with a list of substandard and
dilapidated housing units identified in
the course of his or her duties which
could benefit from rehabilitation
consistent with the requirements of
Health and Safety Code Section
17995.3.
Program to be
continued when
funding becomes
available
Program 1.7 Homeownership
Education and Counseling
The City requires that all first time
homebuyers receiving city downpayment assistance attend a minimum of 8-hr homeownership education,
prior to close of escrow. The City refers
buyers to agencies, such as Habitat for
Humanity, Stanislaus County who
provide free classes and counseling.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully implemented. The City
requires all first time homebuyers
receiving city down-payment
assistance attend a minimum of 8-hr
homeownership education, prior to
close of escrow. The City refers
buyers to agencies, such as Habitat
for Humanity, Stanislaus County who
provide free classes and counseling.
Program will be
continued, and
expanded to
incorporate
stakeholder
engagement.
526
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 4 The topics covered include: Planning &
Preparation, Understanding Credit,
Managing a Budget and Protecting
your Investment.
Topics covered: Planning &
Preparation, Understand Credit,
Managing a Budget and Protecting
your Investment.
Program 1.8 Code Enforcement
The City will enforce, on a complaint or
request basis, local zoning; housing,
fire, and building codes; and standards
for landscaping maintain safe and
decent housing. Property owners with
code violations who meet eligibility
requirements for participation in local
programs will be offered an opportunity
to correct code violations utilizing
financial assistance, when funds are
available. The primary goal of the
regulation is to provide reasonable
controls for the maintenance,
rehabilitation, preservation, and
conservation of existing commercial
and residential properties. There is a
Service Request Hotline to report at
(209) 840-6111.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully implemented. The City
has a code enforcement officer to
enforce local zoning; housing, fire,
and building codes, to maintain safe
and decent housing.
Program will be
continued and
expanded to
ensure that code
enforcement
activities
affirmatively
further fair
housing.
Program 1.9 Monitor and
Preserve Affordable Housing
The City has identified five
developments with a total of 2541 units
which generally have covenants that
do not expire until after 2030. To
determine how effective the City
housing programs have been in the
development and maintenance of
affordable housing, the City will
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully implemented. All at-risk
units were renewed. For the 6th Cycle,
sixteen units within the 80 unit Oak
Haven development are At Risk as
they have affordability restrictions that
are set to expire in 2033. The City
continues to track affordable housing
units locally through the annual
monitoring and certification process to
Program will be
modified and
continued.
527
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 5 monitor these affordable units to
ensure that the rent payments charged
are consistent with levels appropriate
for the identified income category. The
City has posted their AB 987
Affordable Housing database on its
website and will continue to track
affordable housing units locally
through the annual certification
process. In addition, as the community
develops additional affordable units
these properties will be added to the
table and will be monitored annually to
ensure they meet affordability
requirements.
ensure compliance with all
requirements.
Program 2.1 Housing
Opportunity Sites
To facilitate the development of
affordable housing and accommodate
the 2015-2023 RHNA allocation, the
City has identified two vacant lots
located at Pedersen and J St with
approximately 3 acres. The property
was purchased with Neighborhood
Stabilization Program (NSP). The City
will participate with the Stanislaus
County HOME Consortium and
request up to $1,000,000 in
CDBG/NSP consortium funds to assist
in the development of affordable multifamily units.
Development by
2023
Successful. The Stanislaus County
Housing Authority constructed a 56
multi-family unit apartment complex
on the 3 acre site at Pedersen and J
Street. This project was approved by
the Oakdale City Council on January
16, 2018 and was finaled in
December of 2020.
Program will be
consolidated with
Program 1.2.
Program 2.2 Second Units
Allow second units by right in all
residential districts to encourage
Ongoing, 2015-2023
The City continues to encourage the
use of second units in single-family
residential areas to offer a more
Program will be
continued
(renamed
528
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 6 opportunities for affordable housing
and promote the development of
second units through providing
informational materials on the City’s
website (http://www.oakdale.gov)
including a description of the second
unit application process, requirements,
and potential City development
incentives (e.g., reduced fees, flexible
development standards, expedited
permit processing).
affordable housing option. Also the
City will receive SB 2 Grant Funds to
create ready to build ADU Building
Plans from 250 sf to 1,000 sf with
participating jurisdictions within
Stanislaus County and provide code
amendments to the Oakdale Zoning
Code to be consistent with State Law.
Accessory
Dwelling Units)
and revised to
address changes
in State law,
including the
development of
pre-approved ADU
plans and may
consider allowing
the separate sale
of ADUs.
Program 2.3 First-Time
Homebuyer Down Payment
Assistance Program
Provide first-time homebuyer down
payment assistance with funding from
the State of California Department of
Housing and Community Development
(HCD) and the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) to lower income households
and promote and encourage program
participation through providing
information on the City’s website
including program guidelines, eligibility
requirements, the application, and a
City contact for more information.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successful. The City received funding
to assist low-income families with
Down Payment Assistance in lowinterest, deferred payment loans.
Program will be
continued, and
consolidated with
Program 2.4.
Program 2.4 First-Time
Homebuyer Program
Work with local lenders and the
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successful. City staff meets and
collaborates with local lenders and
realtors to encourage participation in
Program will be
continued, and
529
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 7 Housing Authority to encourage
participants in the City’s First-Time
Homebuyer Program and participate
with local lenders and the Stanislaus
County Housing Authority to provide
first-time homebuyers with the ability to
take 20-percent of their annual
mortgage interest as a dollar-for-dollar
tax credit against their federal income
tax.
the City's First-Time Homebuyer
Program.
consolidated with
Program 2.3.
Program 2.5 Multi-Family
Affordable Housing Developer
Incentive Program
Provide incentives (e.g., discounts, fee
exemptions, deferment of payment of
Capital Facility Fees until occupancy
building permit issuance) to affordable
housing developers (i.e., Stanislaus
County Housing Authority and/or other
recognized nonprofit housing
sponsors) that provide for very lowand low-income housing units.
As development
applications are
submitted and review
annually, 2015-2023
Successful. The City contracted with
the Housing Authority to administer its
NSP program and purchased 2
vacant parcels (approx. 3 acres) on
Pedersen Rd. & J Street. Oakdale
City Council approved this project on
January 16, 2018 and the project was
completed in December 2020.
Program will be
continued.
Program 2.6 Alternative Housing
Models
The City recognizes the changing
housing needs of its population,
including aging seniors, and disabled
residents, including the
developmentally disabled in need of
supportive services. To meet such
needs, the City can encourage the
provision of more innovative housing
types that may be suitable for the
community, including community care
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Partially successful. The City currently
has Balmare under construction, a
110 unit Assisted Living complex on
West F Street. Capital fees were
reduced to incentivize this project.
Program will be
revised and
continued.
530
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 8 facilities, supportive housing, and
assisted living for seniors and the
disabled. Assisted living facilities are
designed for individuals needing
assistance with activities of daily living,
but desiring to live as independently as
possible for as long as possible. Such
facilities bridge the gap between
independent living and nursing homes,
and offer residents help with daily
activities such as eating, bathing,
dressing, laundry, housekeeping, and
assistance with medications. Assisted
living can help to meet the housing and
supportive service needs of the senior
and disabled population.
Program 2.7 State and Federal
Housing Programs
Seek and use all available funding
programs and other types of housing
assistance (e.g., programs operated
by Community Development Block
Grants (CDBG), Home Investment
Partnership (HOME), Cal HOME, State
Bond funds (Proposition 46 and
Proposition 1-C), California Housing
Finance Agency (CHFA), HUD Section
202 (senior housing), HUD Section
811 (for disabled persons) and the
Federal Low Income Housing Tax
Credits) in an effort to accommodate
the housing needs unique to special
needs groups including funding
specifically targeted for the
development of housing affordable to
Annually
Successful. The City participates in
the Stanislaus HOME Consortium,
which receives an annual federal
entitlement of HOME funds.
Program will be
continued.
531
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 9 extremely low-income households.
The City will monitor the availability of
local, State, and federal housing
programs on an annual basis. The City
participates in the Stanislaus HOME
Consortium, which receives an annual
federal entitlement of HOME funds. It
is anticipated that the City will continue
to apply for funds from the Cal Home
and/or CDBG program on an annual
and/or project basis.
Program 2.8 Jobs Housing
Balance
Maintain a sufficient inventory of land
zoned for commercial and industrial
uses to permit economic development
necessary to provide employment for
the new households identified in the
Regional Housing Needs Assessment
(RHNA).
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successful. The adopted 2030
General Plan provides for a total of
approx. 18 million sq. ft. of nonresidential uses accommodating approx. 31,849 employees. When
jobs and housing are compared, the
General Plan provides for a ratio of
2.0 jobs for each housing unit.
(Source: City of Oakdale 2030
General Plan/Land Use/Development
Potential). Currently, the City
maintains an inventory of land zoned
for commercial and industrial uses
within the East F Street Specific Plan,
the South Oakdale Industrial Specific
Plan and the Crane Crossing Specific
Plan.
Program has been
incorporated into
the General Plan
and will be
removed from the
Housing Element.
Program 2.9 Reduced Fees for
Infill Sites
Provide incentives (e.g., reduced
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successful. The City's Fees were
updated in accordance with
Government Code 6600 Et Seq..
Program will be
continued and
expanded to
532
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 10 developer fees, other fee discounts,
deferrals, and/or waivers) in an effort to
remove constraints in developing infill
sites for projects that include extremely
low-income, very low-income, lowincome, or senior units.
During this update, some of the
applicable fees decreased.
address changes
in State law,
including AB 602.
Program 2.10 Researching
Developing an Affordable
Housing Program
Research the possibility of developing
an affordable housing program through
the creation of a City Municipal Code
ordinance that would require new
residential development to provide for
a specified proportion of low- and
moderate-income housing units along
with the market-rate units. The
potential requirements of such an
ordinance will be explored and options
will be brought before the City Council
to decide if an affordable housing
ordinance is an effective strategy for
the provision of affordable housing in
Oakdale.
2018
Program was not implemented due to
a lack of interest in an inclusionary
program. However, staff continues to
make every effort to work with other
agencies and non-profit developers to
create and maintain affordable
housing. The development of
Hertiage Oaks is an excellent
example of a project successfully
completed with staff guidance,
assistance and support. Staff has
been working with the Stanislaus
County Housing Authority for the
development of Oak Leaf Meadows
project which consists of 56-unit multifamily project that completed construction in December 2020.
Program will not
be continued
Program 2.11 Water and Sewer
Service Priority for Affordable
Housing
Provide a copy of the adopted City of
Oakdale Housing Element in
accordance with State law to all water
and sewer providers serving Oakdale
Deliver Housing
Element within 30-
days of Adoption.
Prepare Procedures
Manual by end of
2018
Successful. The City is the sole
provider of water and sewer for
potential new developments within its
City limits. Copies of the Housing
Element have been shared with
Public Works Staff.
Program will be
continued and
updated to require
a written policy.
533
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 11 in support of granting priority for
service allocations to proposed
developments that include housing
units affordable to lower income
households. The City will establish a
written procedure by the end of 2018
pursuant to Government Code Section
65589.7 in an effort to provide priority
service to developments with units
affordable to lower income
households.
Program 2.12 Coordination with
Other Agencies to Monitor AtRisk Projects
Monitor at-risk assisted housing
projects to ensure the affordability
covenants remain and work with the
necessary agencies and sources of atrisk projects (e.g., California Housing Partnership Corporation (CHPC), the
Housing Authority, the owners of atrisk units, HCD, and HUD) to provide support and coordination in addressing
the wide range of preservation needs,
issues, and opportunities.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
In 2018, staff expedited the Building
plan check review process for the
Oak Leaf Meadows project. The
expedited plan review allowed the
developer to meet the requirements
for the Low-Income Housing Tax
Credit funding in a timely matter to
preserve affordable covenants. That
project was completed in December
of 2020. The City will continue to
monitor the 16 at-risk units
Program will be
combined with an
At-Risk Program
to ensure all
requirements are
met.
Program 2.13 Crane Crossing
Specific Plan Annexation
The City shall maintain its vacant
sites inventory by facilitating the
development of the Crane Crossing
Specific Plan, and designate thereinsufficient sites to accommodate the dwelling units identified in Table 3-
42, and specifically, those sites
Ongoing, 2015-2023 Successful; the Crane Canyon
annexation is complete.
Annexation of
Crane Canyon is
complete and that
aspect of the
program will not
be carried forward.
However, the
Sierra Pointe
534
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 12 designated for higher density
development in order to meet the
regional housing needs of lower
income households. On July 22,
2015, Stanislaus LAFCo approved
the annexation of the Cane Crossing
Specific Plan into the City of
Oakdale. The official annexation
became effective in September. To
promote housing for lower-income
groups, the City shall permit the
development of sites designated for
higher density development in
accordance with Section 65583.2(h)
and (i) of the Government Code,
including permitting multi-family
housing without discretionary review,
or beyond what is typically required
by the City. The City will also
consider allowing additional density
bonuses within the Crane Crossing
Specific Plan for affordable housing
development projects that commit to
providing Extremely Low-, Very Low-
, and Low Income Housing.
project has not yet
received final
LAFCO approval
so that annexation
program will
replace this one.
Program 2.14 Crane Crossing
Specific Plan – Lot
Consolidation
In an effort to assist in the multi-family
development within the Crane
Crossing Specific Plan, the City will
play an active role in facilitating lot
consolidation for parcels listed in Table
3-42A. For example, the City will work
Ongoing, 2015-2023,
and as interested
parties inquire about
multi-family
development within
the Crane Crossing
Specific Plan
Ongoing as development projects are
submitted for consideration.
Program will be
consolidated.
535
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 13 with non-profit developers and owners
of small sites to identify and
consolidate parcels to facilitate the
development of housing affordable to
lower income households. The lot
consolidation procedure will also be
discussed with developers during the
pre-application review process.
Program 2.15 Monitoring of
Residential Capacity (No Net
Loss)
The City will monitor the consumption
of residential acreage to ensure an
adequate inventory is available to meet
the City’s Regional Housing Need
Allocation obligations. To ensure
sufficient residential capacity is
maintained to accommodate the
RHNA, the City will annually review its
inventory available for residential
development. Should a reduction in
capacity below the residential capacity
needed to accommodate the
remaining need for lower-income
households, the City will identify and, if
necessary, rezone sufficient sites to
accommodate the shortfall and ensure
a “no net loss” in capacity to
accommodate the RHNA.
Annually
Successfully implemented on an
ongoing basis as development
projects are submitted for
consideration.
Program will be
continued and
consolidated with
Program 1.2.
Program 3.1 Remove
Development Constraints
Staff will periodically review the
development standards for the
residential zones to identify standards
that may constrain the development of
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully implemented on an
ongoing basis as development
projects are submitted for
consideration. City uses the PD
Planned Development process and
Program will be
continued and
modified to ensure
compliance with
GC 65915.
536
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 14 affordable housing and housing for
special groups, such as disabled
individuals. The City is flexible and is
committed to working with developers
to build affordable units, which may
require modifications to constraining
standards. Flexible development
standards provision allow for variation
of the development/design standards
required by the multifamily zones when
affordable units are include in
development. Allowed modifications
include such standards as parking, unit
size, lot size lot dimensions, setbacks,
common open space, art in public
spaces standard/fees and public work
improvements.
the provisions under Government
Code 65915 to allow flexibility.
Program 3.2 Streamline
Application Process
Streamline and improve the
development review process through
the City’s “One Stop Shop” efforts to
eliminate any unnecessary delays
and/or restrictions to the development
of affordable housing including
projects with extremely low-income
units built by the Housing Authority,
nonprofits, and other affordable
housing providers. Provide information
about permit streamlining at the
planning counter, on the City website
and in other public places to increase
awareness.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully implemented. The City
continues its "One Stop Shop" to
streamline and improve the
development review process to
eliminate any unnecessary delays
and/or restrictions.
Program will be
consolidated with
a new Program to
zone for a variety
of housing types
and continued.
537
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 15 Program 3.3 Large Family
Households
Provide incentives (e.g., flexible
development standards, density
bonus, fast track processing, fee
reductions etc.) to developers to
encourage the inclusion of units with
three or more bedrooms to
accommodate low-income large family
households. Individual projects will be
evaluated to determine if they qualify
for any incentives on a case by case
basis.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully implemented on an
ongoing basis. The Oak Leaf
Meadows Project provided eighteen 3
bedroom units to accommodate large
family households. The City continues
to seek and use all available funding
programs and other types of housing
assistance in an effort to
accommodate the housing needs of
large family households.
Program 3.4 Reasonable
Accommodations Information
and Referral
Provide information to individuals with
disabilities regarding reasonable
accommodations policies, practices,
and procedures based on guidelines
from the California Housing and
Community Development Department
(HCD). This information will be
disseminated through postings and
pamphlets at City and other public
buildings and the City’s website
(http://www.oakdalegov.com). The
information will also have the
information distributed through the fair
housing agency Project Sentinel,
Disability Resource Agency for
Independent Living (DRAIL), and the
Housing Authority.
Ongoing
Not successful. While the City
provides information to individuals
and referral to free technical advice
and services such as removing ability
barriers from home or property
Administered by the Disability
Resource Agency for Independent
Living (DRAIL) in Modesto, no
requests have been received. Better
dissemination about the availability of
this program is needed.
Program will be
continued and
expanded to
include metrics
and action items.
538
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 16
3.5 Handicapped Barrier
Removal Program
Support the Handicapped Barrier
Removal Program administered by the
Disability Resource Agency for
Independent Living (DRAIL), which
provides free technical advice and
funding options regarding the removal
of ability barriers from home or
property.
Ongoing
The City was awarded a Caltrans
Sustainable Transportation Planning
Grant for an Accessibility Master Plan.
The plan will enable the City to
address deficiencies in the pedestrian
infrastructure by identifying and
prioritizing solutions through
extensive interaction with the public,
youth, elderly and the disabled and
committing to an action plans to
implement solutions. This plan was
adopted by the City Council on
December 4, 2018.
Program actions
will be
consolidated
within Program
3.4. 3.6 Water and Wastewater
Providers
Pursuant to Chapter 727, Statues of
2005 (SB 1087), deliver adopted
housing element and any amendments
thereto to local water and wastewater
service providers. This legislation
allows for coordination between a
jurisdiction and water and wastewater
providers when considering approval
of new residential projects, to ensure
that the providers have an opportunity
to provide input on the Element.
Within one year of
Housing Element
Adoption
A copy of the Housing Element is on
the City website. The City is the sole
provider of water and sewer for
potential new development within its
City limits. Copies of the Housing
Element have been shared with
Public Works Staff.
Program will be
continued.
3.7 Flood Management
Review and revise where appropriate
the Conservation and Safety Elements
(Public Health & Safety Element of the
2030 General Plan) to consider flood
Ongoing, 2015-2023
On December 5, 2016 the City
Council adopted Resolution No. 2016-
140 approving the General Plan
Amendment to the Public Health and
Safety Element pursuant to the
Program is
complete and will
not be continued.
539
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 17 risks when making land use decisions
in accordance with Government
Section 65302.
requirement of California Senate Bill 5
and associated legislation related to
provision of 200-Year Flood
Protection for California Urban Areas.
4.1 Fair Housing
Participate in local fair housing
strategies, including collaborating with
Project Sentinel, the local Fair Housing
Agency, as well as other Federal and
State fair housing agencies to help
identify the impediments to fair housing
choice. Comply fully with all federal,
State, and local non-discrimination
laws and with the rules and regulations
governing Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity in housing and
employment. Accept complaints for
forwarding to the California
Department of Fair Employment and
Housing. Distribute fair housing
policies and public information on the
enforcement activities of the State Fair
Employment and Housing
Commission through posting at City
department offices and other public
buildings, distributing with other
housing program materials, within
employment notices, and on the City’s
website (http://www.oakdalegov.com).
When appropriate, publish
informational notices in both English
and Spanish.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully implememted. No The
City has a process to refer fair
housing complaints to Project
Sentinel Fair Housing in Modesto, but
no Fair Housing complaints were filed
during the 5th Cycle.. The City will
continue to participate in local fair
housing strategies, including
collaborating with Project Sentinel,
the local Fair Housing Agency, as well
as other Federal and State fair
housing agencies to help identify the
impediments to fair housing choice.
When appropriate, publish
informational notices in both English
and Spanish.
Program will be
continued and
expanded to
address metrics.
4.2 Housing Choice Voucher Ongoing, 2015-2023 Successful. The City continues to support the Housing Authority of
Program
continued and
540
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 18 Program
Support the Stanislaus County
Housing Authority who sponsors and
implements the County’s Housing
Choice voucher program that is
available to qualifying extremely lowand very low-income households and work with the Housing Authority to
provide information to Oakdale
residents on the availability of the
Section 8 program.
Stanislaus County in implementing
the County's Housing Choice Voucher
program through providing
information and referrals to the
Authority.
expanded to
include proactive
marketing to the
Oakdale
community when
Housing Choice
Voucher waiting
lists are open with
the County.
4.3 Coordination with Agencies
Serving the Homeless
Work with homeless service providers
and agencies in the region (e.g.,
Stanislaus County Consortium, Haven
Women’s Center, and the Community
Housing and Shelter Services) to
support the efforts of homeless
assistance, site identification, and
funding applications.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successfully Implemented. As a
participating member of the
Stanislaus County Consortium, the
City continues to work with agencies
such as the County Social Services
Agency, Women's Haven, the
Community Housing and Shelter
Services, and the United Way.
Program to be
continued.
5.1 Density Bonus Ordinance
To allow for and encourage the
development of higher density
residential projects to increase
opportunities for affordable units, the
City will implement, promote, and
encourage the City’s Density Bonus
Ordinance (Chapter 36, Section 36-18-
20.3 and 36-18-20.10) by targeting the
development community through
informational materials on the City’s
website (http://www.oakdalegov.com)
Ongoing, 2015-2023
Successful. The City permitted an
additional 8 units for the Heritage
Oaks Senior Apts. (income/age
restricted project) for a total of 50
units on 1.5 acres. To allow for and
encourage the development of higher
density residential projects to
increase opportunities for affordable
units, the City will implement,
promote, and encourage the City’s
Density Bonus Ordinance (Chapter
Program will be
modified and
continued. Code
changes will
ensure alignment
of the City’s
Density Bonus
program with
Government Code
65915.
541
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 19 that describes the density bonus
application process, requirements, and
lists the available developer incentives
or concessions (e.g., increased
density, reduction of site development
standards, modification of Zoning
Code or architectural design
requirements, or deferred
development impact fees).
36, Section 36-18-20.3 and 36-18-
20.10) by targeting the development
community through informational
materials on the City’s website
(http://www.oakdalegov.com) that
describes the density bonus
application process, requirements,
and lists the available developer
incentives or concessions (e.g.,
increased density, reduction of site
development standards, modification
of Zoning Code or architectural
design requirements, or deferred
development impact fees).
5.2 Fee Subsidies for Extremely
Low-Income Households
Promote and encourage the
development of multi-family housing
affordable to and supportive of the
needs of extremely low-income
households through offering housing
developers financial incentives or
regulatory concessions (e.g., reduced
fees, fee exemptions, flexible
development standards, deferment of
payment of Capital Facility Fees until
occupancy building permit issuance,
and density bonus).
On a case by case basis, when funding
is available, the City shall subsidize up
a portion of the application processing
Implement process
by 2016
Program is implemented on an
ongoing basis as development
projects are submitted for
consideration. Unfortunately, no
applications were received during the
5th cycle for projects that included
units affordable to ELI households
that could have benefitted from this
program. Program information is
located at the planning counter and
on the City website, but additional
promotion of the program is needed
Program to be
modified and
continued with
enhanced
proactive outreach
to providers.
542
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 20 fees for developments in which five
percent of units are affordable to
extremely low-income households. To
be eligible for this fee subsidy, the units
shall be affordable by affordability
covenant (no less than 45 years for
owner-occupied units and not less than
55 years for rental units). The City shall
promote the benefits of this program to
the development community by
posting information in its web page and
creating a handout to be distributed
with land development applications.
5.3 Housing for Developmentally
Disabled Persons Program
To accommodate residents with
developmental disabilities the City will
seek State and Federal monies, as
funding becomes available, in support
of housing construction and
rehabilitation targeted for persons with
disabilities, including developmental
disabilities. The City will also provide
regulatory incentives, such as
expedited permit processing and fee
waivers and deferrals, to projects
target for persons with disabilities,
including persons with developmental
disabilities. Additionally, the City shall
refer developmentally disabled
persons to the Valley Mountain
Regional Center for information on
housing and services.
Ongoing, 2015-2023 Ongoing as development projects are
submitted for consideration.
Program to be
continued.
543
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 21
5.4 Farmworker Housing
Persons Program
Provide incentives (e.g., flexible
development standards, density
bonus, fast track processing, fee
reductions etc.) to developers to
encourage housing for farmworkers.
Individual projects will be evaluated to
determine if they qualify for any
incentives on a case by case basis.
The City will review the zoning
ordinance to determine that zoning and
development standards encourage a
variety of housing types for farmworker
housing needs, including multi-family,
manufactured housing, mobile homes,
single room occupancy, and second
units. The City will encourage the
development of housing for
farmworkers by assisting interested
developers with applications for
funding and assisting in application
processing to mitigate any potential
processing constraints. The City will
develop an informational brochure
illustrating the possible funding
sources and other City incentives for
the development of farmworker
housing and provide this brochure at
the Public Services Department and
City website.
Develop
informational
brochure by end of
2017 and provide
annual outreach to
developers and/or
non-profit agencies
Not successful. The Program is
partially implemented on an ongoing
as development projects are
submitted for consideration., but no
proposals that included units or bunks
for farmworkers were submitted
during the 5th Cycle. The zoning audit
was also not completed. The
Program need to be expanded to
specifically address farmworker
housing needs.
Program to be
modified and
expanded.
6.1 Home Energy Conservation
Programs Ongoing, 2015-2023
On April 21, 2014 the City Council
adopted a resolution consenting to
the Inclusion of Properties within the
Program is
complete and will
544
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 22 Promote home energy conservation
programs (e.g., energy education,
weatherization, and energy-efficient
appliances) through informational
brochures and City website
announcements that target lower
income households. The California
HERO Program is being offered to
allow property owners in participating
cities and counties to finance
renewable energy, energy water
efficiency improvements and electric
vehicle charging infrastructure on their
property.
City's Jurisdiction in the California
HERO Program to Finance
Distributed Generation Renewable
Energy Sources, Energy and Water
Efficiency Improvements and Electric
Vehicle Charging Infrastructure and
approved an Amendment to a Certain
Joint Powers Agreement. The City
has also adopted and enforces the
California Green Building Code.
not be carried
forward.
6.2 Water Conservation
To promote water conservation efforts,
the City will seek out and pursue
funding for programs that reduce or
conserve water for the construction
and rehabilitation of housing
developments. Specifically the City will
assist developers and residents in
conserving resources and lowering
utility costs by partnering with utility
providers to establish programs that
promote: the use of drought tolerant
landscaping, bioswales and other
stormwater systems; installation of
water meters and other water
conservation devices; and other
measure to identify and to eliminate
unnecessary or wasteful water
consumption.
Ongoing, 2015-2023
The City continues to promote water
conservation to meet the State
mandated reduction in SBx7-7. In
addition, the City maintains and
implements the adopted Urban Water
Management Plan.
Program will be
continued and
consolidated.
545
City of Oakdale 2024-2031 Housing Element - Appendix A p. 23 Considered together, the City’s success in implementing its 5th Cycle Housing Element Programs was strongest where Programs involved continuation of existing City programs but was less successful when they involved proactive outreach or Code changes that take significant staff time and resources. The City’s success in the effectiveness of its programs for special needs housing was also mixed, with many programs and objectives aimed at assisting multiple special needs groups including seniors, farmworkers, extremely low income, homeless and large households not being successful due to a lack of interest from the development community. The needs of certain households that require the deepest subsidies (extremely low-income households, farmworkers, and the homeless) have not been met. Moving ahead into the 6th Cycle, the City will need to engage in substantial proactive outreach measures and to pursue State grants or other funding to help ensure success in implementing its Housing Element Programs to meet all needs. 546
APPENDIX B: Community Engagement Summary
The City of Oakdale values community input and has maintained a focus on offering various opportunities for residents and community stakeholders to provide input on housing and development needs during the preparation of this Housing Element.
Government Code 65583(c)(7) requires that “the local government shall make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element, and the program shall describe this effort.” This appendix documents how public engagement was sought and gathered during the update process, and how the input received from residents and stakeholders was incorporated into the preparation and content of the Housing Element.
Community engagement has informed the Housing Element Update from day one. This Appendix provides an executive summary of outreach conducted prior to the launch of the Public Review Draft, and supplemented to incorporate community input on the draft following transmittals to the California Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD).
The following Appendix contains the results of the Housing Needs & Opportunities Survey. Continued updates on the Housing Element Update process and opportunities to comment are found at
https://www.oakdalegov.com/housing-element.
Public Workshops
The Oakdale City Council and Planning Commission hosted a series of informational workshops over the course of the Housing Element’s development, including a kickoff workshop in August 2024 and a Public Review Draft Workshop with the Planning Commission in December 2024.
Community Housing Needs & Opportunities Survey
The bilingual (English/Spanish) Housing Needs & Opportunities Survey was promoted with a flyer delivered in the Citywide utility mailer (figure below). The response is higher than typical engagement in Oakdale, with 549 respondents as of March 2025. 545 responses were completed in English and 4 in Spanish. The complete survey is attached to the Housing Element as Appendix C. 547
548
Public Review Draft Housing Element Update
Pursuant to State law, the Public Review Draft Housing Element was circulated for 30 days on November 25, 2024 and shared with prior survey respondents and interested parties. Following the close of the public review period, 10 working days were held to revise the draft prior to HCD submittal on January 15, 2025.
Written public comment was not received during the 30 day period, but public comment received during the Public Review Draft workshop of December 4, 2024 were included.
549
Revised Draft Housing Element Update
The Initial Draft Housing Element was transmitted to HCD on January 15, 2025 for 90-day review, with formal findings due back from HCD on April 16, 2025.
Following informal comments from HCD, technical corrections were made to the Housing Element to support the City in achieving certification. Pursuant to State law, the Revised Draft Housing Element was circulated for 7 days on March 26, 2025 and shared with prior survey respondents and interested parties prior to transmittal of edits to HCD on April 2, 2025.
550
551
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
1 / 24
51.48% 279
44.10% 239
38.75% 210
35.06% 190
27.12% 147
26.75% 145
23.06% 125
13.65% 74
9.59% 52
Q1 The biggest housing needs facing Oakdale today are (check all that apply):
Answered: 542 Skipped: 3
Total Respondents: 542
# OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Needs homes
that are
affordable t...
Needs housing
choices in
lower price...
Needs
lower-cost
rental housing
Needs more
housing for
young famili...
Needs housing
for people who
work here
Needs more
housing for
seniors
All of
Oakdale’s
housing need...
Needs
intergeneration
al living...
Other (please
specify)
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Needs homes that are affordable to first-time homebuyers Needs housing choices in lower price range
Needs lower-cost rental housing
Needs more housing for young families and workers
Needs housing for people who work here
Needs more housing for seniors
All of Oakdale’s housing needs are being met
Needs intergenerational living options
Other (please specify)
552
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
2 / 24
1 Better infrastructure, not homes 2/27/2025 7:52 AM
2 Retirement communities 55 and over needed as well 1/12/2025 1:25 PM 3 Needs new housing with bigger lots/backyards 11/2/2024 7:12 PM 4 30%. Income based 10/5/2024 4:47 PM
5 Need housing for disabled people who are not seniors 9/29/2024 1:49 PM 6 Homeless housing 9/25/2024 2:24 PM
7 No need for additional hotels. Especially Fairfield Inn 9/23/2024 6:37 PM 8 Unhoused 9/19/2024 3:55 PM
9 We need to limit growth. And encourage people to live and work in the same area. 9/17/2024 4:02 PM 10 Needs affordable senior communities, (e.g. Del Webb) Needs more secure gated communities.
Needs grocery store near west side of town on Hwy 108 near Crane road. 9/17/2024 6:55 AM
11 Need the infrustruction before more housing, there is only grocery, restaurants and little to no shopping for clothing, etc
9/17/2024 6:50 AM
12 Need schools before more housing 9/16/2024 9:19 PM
13 Property taxes are too high here 9/16/2024 6:10 PM
14 More gated communities, Rental communities not interspersed with single family homes 9/16/2024 1:01 PM 15 Something needs to be done about the homeless 9/16/2024 4:46 AM 16 More green spaces in housings 9/13/2024 8:14 PM
17 Laura interest rates affordable for seniors who want to downsize from a bigger house to a lower one unit house like a studio
9/12/2024 12:31 PM
18 How large does Oakdale want to be? Plans to be? That’s the question 9/11/2024 2:32 PM 19 Change zoning to alow residential units in addition to main house. 9/11/2024 11:43 AM 20 Tiny houses 9/10/2024 8:39 PM
21 We need houses that whether you're a first-time buyer or a second time buyer you could afford.
We would love to move completely to Oakdale. We do not want to sell our home in the other town because we go back and forth all the time but we cannot find housing here that is affordable and decent.
9/10/2024 8:14 AM
22 Oakdale needs more housing in general. Rental rates are skyrocketing, the first step of the home ownership ladder is broken. We need housing for first time buyers 9/9/2024 10:55 PM
23 With any new houses there must be schools and other resources that come with expanding communities. When Oakdale builds housing the city must accommodate for the needs of what bringing more people and there families requires. Not just overcrowding the resources already here.
9/9/2024 9:38 AM
24 We don't need to build more houses. We have only two main street and you cannot change that plus we don't need law income housing care, we pay so much for our homes.You will force me to sell and leave
9/9/2024 8:52 AM
25 Don’t build an instant ghetto. City involvement usually does the wrong thing. 50 yr GC. 9/8/2024 5:38 PM 26 Seniors on limited income 9/8/2024 12:56 PM
27 Oakdale does not need the problems that follow "affordable housing" 9/8/2024 11:38 AM 28 Keep Oakdale the small town we moved here to be. There are plenty of affordable options in Stanislaus County.
9/8/2024 11:25 AM
29 Oakdale does not need to become Manteca and allow new housing permits to be distributed by the hundreds.
9/7/2024 1:24 PM
30 Stop being democratic!! When you manipulate things it’s communist and socialism!! Are you 9/6/2024 10:25 PM 553
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
3 / 24
stupid???? And are dumber than dog shit
31 Build more homes for us blue collar families, Oakdale needs at least 500 more homes and 5 more apartment complexes immediately
9/6/2024 6:57 PM
32 Low income housing, apartment complexes 1-3 bedrooms, tiny home communities and transitional housing for homlesss
9/6/2024 5:59 PM
33 Keep oakdale small! 9/6/2024 4:08 PM
34 As with all attempts at social engineering that usually fail. How is building more lower income housing near meddle or higher income housing help the lower income people? I don't think it makes them feel any better, just the people engineering it? The humans and the market will always equal things out!
9/6/2024 3:15 PM
35 Stop building housing in oakdale people need to stay pit of this town crime has skyrocketed ever since all the lower income housing
9/5/2024 4:04 PM
36 Need to partner with other Stanislaus County cities, the county, the state, and the federal government, to create a homeless housing campus with treatment center, a store, and park space, to house and treat our homeless population.
9/5/2024 3:34 PM
37 To many houses here already 9/5/2024 2:10 PM
38 Keep section 8 out! 9/5/2024 10:19 AM
39 Less people moving here and trying to change what was once a great Town 8/22/2024 7:15 AM 40 Please don't think lower housing costs means higher density housing. Smaller lots are a disaster. Prople jammed together creates strife.
8/20/2024 8:44 AM
41 ( 8/19/2024 8:25 PM
42 More one story houses for people getting older. Like 50 and up but not quite empty nesters yet. 8/19/2024 8:10 PM 43 Low income housing for seniors and families. 8/19/2024 7:35 PM 44 Affordable 8/19/2024 4:01 PM
45 Oakdale does not need more housing. 8/19/2024 3:06 PM 46 Help improve/revitalize homes of those in need, instead of building more cookie cutter homes that bring in people that do not engage in the community. 8/19/2024 2:33 PM
47 It was extremely hard to find affordable housing for our son just starting off on his own. 8/19/2024 2:12 PM 48 Nice larger lot communities to maintain the kind of living Oakdalians want! Decent homes on large lots
8/19/2024 1:27 PM
49 Need big stores to support the housing we already have. Stop sending Oakdales tax money to Riverbank and build stores and create revenue.
8/19/2024 12:56 PM
50 No more housing. Traffic can not handle the population it has now 8/19/2024 12:56 PM 51 We do not need any more houses 8/19/2024 12:50 PM
52 Does not need more houses. Fix up the run down houses to improve town’s appeal 8/19/2024 12:42 PM Q2 Oakdale's housing needs in the coming 10 years will include (check all that apply):
Answered: 539 Skipped: 6
554
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
4 / 24
66.60% 359
26.53% 143
24.49% 132
52.88% 285
45.45% 245
10.02% 54
Total Respondents: 539
# OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY) DATE
1 Town infrastructure, not homes 2/27/2025 7:52 AM
2 More housing thats reasonable in nice areas. 1/4/2025 12:19 AM 3 We need business not housing 11/4/2024 8:34 PM
4 Housing options for disabled young adults 9/29/2024 1:49 PM 5 None apply. 9/23/2024 6:37 PM
6 Housing with bigger lots 9/21/2024 12:48 PM
7 We will need to make use of preexisting housing and buildings. 9/17/2024 4:02 PM 8 Oakdale needs a Target or super Walmart( old Kmart location?) so all the sales tax revenue doesn’t go to Riverbank or Modesto as it does now and make residents waste time &money traveling to get items unavailable in Oakdale.
9/17/2024 12:57 PM
9 bringing upscale shopping for the continued housing market currently going on. there are none 9/17/2024 6:50 AM 10 Slowed housing growth to match business and tax revenue 9/16/2024 1:01 PM 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Housing priced
so that younger
Oakdale...
Businesses
will need
housing...
Housing will
need to be
priced to...
Older homes
will be
deterioratin...
Our aging
population will
need...
Other (please
specify)
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Housing priced so that younger Oakdale residents can afford to live here Businesses will need housing affordable to their workers Housing will need to be priced to attract new families to Oakdale Older homes will be deteriorating and in need of repair Our aging population will need accessible, well-designed housing options Other (please specify)
555
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
5 / 24
11 Do not interfere with the housing market! 9/14/2024 8:39 PM 12 Schools to handle the additional children. 9/14/2024 9:03 AM 13 Places to go for old people 9/13/2024 8:14 PM
14 Affordable options to locals over out of area buyers 9/12/2024 5:17 PM 15 Slow down the growth! 9/11/2024 10:21 PM
16 How many more businesses are going to be here, coming here? We don’t need a bedroom community. It’s a nice small town, is there a plan to grow? How much and why? 9/11/2024 2:32 PM
17 Smaller houses 9/10/2024 8:39 PM
18 People need to stop moving here with liberal views. 9/10/2024 6:54 AM 19 none 9/9/2024 11:22 AM
20 We cannot afford more taxes when you put all these. Service, you need someone to pay for it.
It's gonna come back to us.
9/9/2024 8:52 AM
21 Need Simple units with ability for EZ upgrades 9/8/2024 5:38 PM 22 Housing for those w disabilities 9/8/2024 3:26 PM
23 Again communism !! Wake up are you dumb !! 9/6/2024 10:25 PM 24 The shortage of available housing 9/6/2024 6:57 PM
25 More housing that is affordable for anyone living in Oakdale which reflects the wages that Oakdale residents make.
9/6/2024 6:01 PM
26 Tiny houses and apartments 9/6/2024 5:59 PM
27 None- stop growing 9/6/2024 4:08 PM
28 Housing on which property taxes aren’t so exorbitant. 9/6/2024 8:39 AM 29 Homeless housing needs to be addressed 9/6/2024 7:25 AM 30 Low income housing 9/5/2024 8:11 PM
31 Where is there room in Oakdale for more housing? 9/5/2024 7:26 PM 32 Improved parks 9/5/2024 6:07 PM
33 Fine the way it is 9/5/2024 5:22 PM
34 no 9/5/2024 5:16 PM
35 If any money is being spent it needs to be spent improving local infrastructure to support the current community not adding even more community when the city barely supports itself now 9/5/2024 4:04 PM
36 no new housing is needed just utilize what is built 9/5/2024 3:56 PM 37 A partnership with all levels of government to create a housing/treatment center campus to help our homeless people and take them off the streets, the local parks and river areas. 9/5/2024 3:34 PM
38 Control growth! 9/5/2024 12:39 PM
39 Keep section 8 out! 9/5/2024 10:19 AM
40 Why do we want more idiots from the Bay Area to this town 8/22/2024 7:15 AM 41 Let the housing market dictate the cost. If employers want to subsidize housing they can.
Don't use our tax dollars to subsidize, use our tax dollars to keep city up to quality standards.
To many houses now with to much traffic.
8/21/2024 3:39 AM
42 Spend the money repairing what we have we have wonderful areas we need to improve on 8/19/2024 10:01 PM 43 Housing priced so low to middle income senior residents can afford to buy and live here. 8/19/2024 7:35 PM 44 Fixing up current neighborhoods so the older areas are just as desirable as the newer areas 8/19/2024 6:13 PM 556
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
6 / 24
45 I am opposed to inceasing housing in Oakdale. Keep it small. 8/19/2024 3:06 PM 46 multi family housing 8/19/2024 3:06 PM
47 8 8/19/2024 2:17 PM
48 Higher priced, higher quality homes to increase tax base and keep the riffraff out 8/19/2024 1:26 PM 49 Take of the roads in the older neighborhoods first. Dont need new home, fix what we already have. What business needs home owners? Let the large businesses in first. 8/19/2024 12:56 PM
50 No more housing. Oakdale is maxed out 8/19/2024 12:56 PM 51 No new housing until we can service other needs besides housing for those who live here. 8/19/2024 12:50 PM 52 Town is too small 8/19/2024 11:53 AM
53 None of the above 8/13/2024 8:20 AM
54 We don’t need more housing. The town in overran with cardboard cutout houses as is and it takes much too long to get from one side of town to the other. The town wasn’t built for this many people. Stop building housing and start building:improving infrastructure to support/sustain the people who already live here. Help to improve our quality of life THEN make space to accommodate others.
8/13/2024 7:42 AM
Q3 Please rank your level of agreement with each of the following statements:
Answered: 545 Skipped: 0
It is
important to
preserve...
My housing
costs have
increased in...
557
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
7 / 24
Some of the
older homes in
Oakdale need...
Some seniors
need assistance
to remain in...
Rental prices
in Oakdale are
too high
My children
can’t afford to
live here in...
558
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
8 / 24
Oakdale needs
more housing
options for ...
People who
work in Oakdale
can’t afford...
There are not
enough housing
options in...
Oakdale should
reduce parking
requirements...
There are no
entry level
559
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
9 / 24
entry-level
homes to...
Oakdale needs
more mixed-use
development
Oakdale needs
to allow more
housing in...
Oakdale should
allow small
apartments...
Oakdale should
allow more
apartments t...
560
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
10 / 24
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Strongly Di… Disagree Neutral / N… Agree
Strongly Ag…
Oakdale should
allow
fourplexes...
Oakdale needs
more housing in
commercial...
Oakdale needs
more housing
near the...
561
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
11 / 24
1.29%
7 1.47%
8 6.45%
35 35.54%
193
55.25%
300 543 1.58
3.30%
18 6.79%
37 13.94%
76 34.50%
188
41.47%
226 545 1.96
1.29%
7 3.32%
18 20.11%
109
54.80%
297
20.48%
111 542 2.10
2.03%
11 4.62%
25 25.51%
138
43.81%
237
24.03%
130 541 2.17
7.37%
40 9.58%
52 21.73%
118
31.31%
170
30.02%
163 543 2.33
5.16%
28 12.89%
70 26.52%
144
31.12%
169
24.31%
132 543 2.43
11.28%
61 14.23%
77 14.42%
78 35.67%
193
24.40%
132 541 2.52
5.18%
28 15.90%
86 34.57%
187
28.10%
152
16.27%
88 541 2.66
10.80%
58 17.50%
94 21.97%
118
31.10%
167
18.62%
100 537 2.71
8.04%
43 15.33%
82 30.84%
165
33.08%
177
12.71%
68 535 2.73
9.56%
52 20.59%
112
21.69%
118
30.33%
165
17.83%
97 544 2.74
16.07%
86 16.64%
89 32.34%
173
26.54%
142
8.41%
45 535 3.05
14.90%
80 19.93%
107
39.29%
211
21.04%
113
4.84%
26 537 3.19
27.68%
150
21.96%
119
16.61%
90 25.83%
140
7.93%
43 542 3.36
30.74%
166
19.26%
104
17.04%
92 24.26%
131
8.70%
47 540 3.39
26.95%
145
23.42%
126
21.00%
113
21.38%
115
7.25%
39 538 3.41
17.10%
92 30.11%
162
38.48%
207
11.71%
63 2.60%
14 538 3.47
19.29%
104
33.02%
178
31.35%
169
13.17%
71 3.15%
17 539 3.52
STRONGLY
DISAGREE
DISAGREE NEUTRAL /
NO
OPINION
AGREE STRONGLY
AGREE
TOTAL WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
It is important to preserve Oakdale
neighborhoods
My housing costs have increased
in the last 5 years
Some of the older homes in
Oakdale need rehabilitation
Some seniors need assistance to
remain in their homes
Rental prices in Oakdale are too
high
My children can’t afford to live here
in Oakdale
Oakdale needs more housing
options for all income levels
People who work in Oakdale can’t
afford to live here
There are not enough housing
options in Oakdale
Oakdale should reduce parking
requirements where safety allows
There are no entry-level homes to
purchase in Oakdale
Oakdale needs more mixed-use
development
Oakdale needs to allow more
housing in conjunction with
existing businesses
Oakdale should allow small
apartments throughout the city
Oakdale should allow more
apartments to be built
Oakdale should allow fourplexes
throughout the city
Oakdale needs more housing in
commercial corridors
Oakdale needs more housing near
the Downtown Area
Q4 Please indicate what types of new housing you feel would be most successful in Oakdale today:
Answered: 523 Skipped: 22
562
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
12 / 24
36.14% 189
32.70% 171
64.05% 335
13.77% 72
20.65% 108
39.01% 204
Total Respondents: 523
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Accessory
dwelling units
(second...
Independent
senior housing
and resident...
Single-family
houses
Co-housing,
micro-units,
and single r...
Multi-family
housing
Missing middle
housing, like
townhouses a...
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Accessory dwelling units (second units/granny units/junior units) Independent senior housing and residential care facilities for seniors or persons with disabilities Single-family houses
Co-housing, micro-units, and single room occupancy
Multi-family housing
Missing middle housing, like townhouses and low-rise multiplexes Q5 What are some unique features of Oakdale that can be housing opportunities for the community? For example:• Locations for multifamily housing • Detached garages and other accessory structures converted into housing• Large homes modified to accommodate more residents• Additional units on large lots• Commercial and industrial area converted to housing
Answered: 293 Skipped: 252
# RESPONSES DATE
1 Oakdale is unique because there is diversity in housing. Adding new housing will drive the prices even higher. And the EIR needs to be reassessed for the new build and infrastructure impact.
2/27/2025 7:52 AM
563
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
13 / 24
2 Large homes modified to accommodate more residents 2/18/2025 3:04 PM 3 Multi-generational housing. Encouraging developers to build larger single-family homes that have a separate living quarters for grandparents, older children, nannies, etc. 2/14/2025 3:57 PM
4 detached garages and other accessory deelling units, and vacent unused buildibgs/property converted into housing for low incone and homeless individuals and families 2/1/2025 8:04 PM
5 In law units, allow parcel separation for in laws to built/recognized. Failing commercial turned into multi-use or residential
1/12/2025 1:25 PM
6 Old shut down commercial buildings would convert nicely into living areas. We don't even have an affordable clothing store either.
1/4/2025 12:19 AM
7 Commercial converted to housing 1/3/2025 5:13 PM
8 Locations for multifamily properties. 12/15/2024 12:58 PM 9 Larger lots with adu options 11/30/2024 5:45 AM
10 Apartments above businesses downtown. Affordable single bedroom units for young residents 11/4/2024 8:34 PM 11 Hmmm 11/4/2024 6:50 PM
12 Houses spread farther apart and larger lots (bigger backyards)- this is why Bridle Ridge neighborhood is so popular.
11/2/2024 7:12 PM
13 Small 1 bedroom or studio units close to downtown businesses 10/16/2024 12:25 PM 14 Additional units in large lots. Housing in unused commercial areas-Kmart 10/15/2024 7:01 AM 15 Housing affordable for seniors. City Landscaping needs improvement in residential areas. 10/14/2024 4:09 PM 16 Commercial & Industrial areas converted to housing. 10/13/2024 3:53 PM 17 Additional units on lots and houses that can be multigenerational 10/11/2024 3:42 PM 18 Single family housing outside. of Oakdale. 10/11/2024 1:54 PM 19 Granny units 10/8/2024 10:44 AM
20 I think that some of the downtown apartments like above H-B and possibly others are in desperate need of updating and renovating. They could be rented at a lower price point than say Harveat apartments. What about also converting that building that is across from Conagra it’s a commercial building into housing. Not a tear down just a renovation. Also the corner of Greger and Yosemite. That several acre parcel that is flanked by Conagra could be apartments or townhouses at a lower rental price point. Just a few off the top of my head 10/7/2024 2:43 PM
21 You strongly need to build duplexes and four Plexes with a yard. It’s a mess at a lower income rate.
10/5/2024 4:47 PM
22 The land in Oakdale is valuable and should remain preserved for agricultural development, not new housing. What about the agricultural opportunities for Oakdale? 10/1/2024 7:27 PM
23 Communities consisting of home owners 9/29/2024 6:09 PM 24 The last two billets here ^ 9/29/2024 1:49 PM
25 Nome 9/27/2024 1:43 PM
26 Some of the rich folks have land that is not used for anything other than to not be close to their neighbors. If your land is NOT your business (e.g. farms, ranches), you should not be allowed to purchase more than one acre of land!
9/25/2024 2:24 PM
27 Do something about the Kmart pls 9/24/2024 6:22 PM
28 No need for additional hotels. 9/23/2024 6:37 PM
29 More townhomes built around downtown. I understand this focus is on housing but how about looking at supports for all the new homes also. Roads are horrible, taxes go to Riverbank because they have the retail options, not enough restaurants, jobs that pay a liveable wage, etc. People need a reason to move here and there aren’t many reasons. 9/23/2024 9:54 AM
564
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
14 / 24
30 Multiple homes on agricultural lots 9/22/2024 6:32 PM 31 None of the above. 9/22/2024 11:11 AM
32 No comment 9/21/2024 9:17 PM
33 None of the above 9/21/2024 12:48 PM
34 I would be supportive of all of the above examples, depending on how they are planned 9/21/2024 9:36 AM 35 Detached garages and other accessory structures converted into housing. Additional units on large lots.
9/20/2024 2:25 PM
36 I like the idea of repurposing existing space. I don't have any concrete examples to propose. 9/20/2024 8:28 AM 37 It is important to keep Oakdale looking prestine. Older homes need to be renovated, repaired & in some cases, torn down to rebuild. The use of building an apartment on top detached garages is a great idea. Or completely renovated into an appartment is wise. So many of them look unused and detoritating.
9/20/2024 6:17 AM
38 None. It will increase traffic more and strain out schools. It will stretch cover for police jeopardize public safety and put officers’ lives at greater risk. It will strain our fire fighters and ambulance service. Building more will only bring people in- it’s not needed by people whom already reside here. Plus, allowing sprawl will increase traffic in neighboring areas, such as Escalon and Valley Home.
9/19/2024 8:31 PM
39 Build low income houses and duplexes, for qualified applicants, and have a lottery. Ask for help from Habitat for Humanity or others. Don't try and start an untried solution. 9/19/2024 3:55 PM
40 Housing with land 9/19/2024 11:47 AM
41 What are we talking about? In order to preserve Oakdale, we don’t need more apartments or multi-family housing. If we are building anything, we need either townhouses or single family dwellings. We have rich farmland that we should be protecting! It supplies food to much of the world. We should focus on filling the old Kmart with a business that might provide our city with more shopping opportunities. It’s been vacant for years. 9/18/2024 8:07 PM
42 Large homes to accommodate families 9/18/2024 3:18 PM 43 Needs houses with land, keep Oakdale country. 9/18/2024 10:33 AM 44 I don’t know 9/18/2024 9:46 AM
45 I’m not for sure 9/17/2024 6:59 PM
46 Additional units in large lots would be so helpful for families wanting to live close to each other 9/17/2024 5:17 PM 47 If we start allowing creative housing, it’s going to devalue neighborhoods. 9/17/2024 4:02 PM 48 N/A 9/17/2024 12:57 PM
49 Extend housing to all borders of the town, including gated communities and more grocery stores
9/17/2024 6:55 AM
50 No additional housing unless there is business development, very low and low income means illegals and unemployed, which means crime. Are additional police, fire and other infrastructure coming first. What is the current unemployment rate in Oakdale? Employers need work ethic employees. More housing does not make common sense.
9/17/2024 6:50 AM
51 No Comment 9/16/2024 6:49 PM
52 No opinion on this 9/16/2024 6:10 PM
53 ADUs, barndominiums 9/16/2024 4:07 PM
54 Not sure 9/16/2024 2:14 PM
55 Not needed. This would change the desirability of living in Oakdale and would not be keeping with the culture of the community that appeals to people. 9/16/2024 1:01 PM
56 None of the above. I feel we needed a housing moratorium. Infrastructure first!! 9/16/2024 11:33 AM 57 Oakdale needs to use some of the empty lots in this town for the small housing developments, 9/16/2024 10:09 AM 565
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
15 / 24
tiny homes for people who want to live in Oakdale but don't want a home with a lot that requires a lot of maintenance and don't want to live in an apartment. Tiny homes are a big deal now days, I think Riverbank is building some, but we don't want low cost homes or section 8 tenants, we also need some more stores so people don't need to go to Riverbank to shop and keep the tax dollars in Oakdale, convert the old K-mart into a Target or something like that residents would love, I know my wife and I would use and not go out of town to shop gas it too high to drive into a different town to shop every week and we have lived here for 30 years now.
Thank you.
58 no idea 9/16/2024 9:59 AM
59 No sure 9/15/2024 8:19 PM
60 Affordable single family houses 9/15/2024 7:57 PM
61 More roads leading into town to allow for more affordable homes on the outskirsts of town. 9/15/2024 6:07 PM 62 ADU's, additional units on large lots, financial assistance for existing older homes occupied by senior citizens on fixed income
9/15/2024 4:52 PM
63 Use land that is open for housing 9/15/2024 1:13 PM
64 Additional units on large lots 9/15/2024 10:00 AM
65 Not sure 9/14/2024 9:01 PM
66 No multifamily buildings, including apartments, duplexes, etc. Let the housing market stay a free and open market in Oakdale.
9/14/2024 8:48 PM
67 Keep the housing market out of city official and government control! Let the free market play itself out.
9/14/2024 8:39 PM
68 No new housings 9/14/2024 8:28 PM
69 There is enough housing currently. 9/14/2024 8:27 PM 70 not be so strict about what you can do with your own property 9/14/2024 5:54 PM 71 Next Gen Houses 9/14/2024 11:00 AM
72 Addition of units on large lots. Commercial area converted. 9/14/2024 10:31 AM 73 Keep Oakdale a single family home community. 9/14/2024 9:03 AM 74 Additional affordable rentals for younger residents or houses. We need additional schools also along with everything.
9/13/2024 6:05 PM
75 Kmart building/land could be developed for mixed use and/or housing for homeless/veterans 9/13/2024 5:26 PM 76 Oakdale needs stricter requirements for homeowners. People are parking trailers on driveways, cars on laws, not taking care of their yards and letting home fall into disarray. Our town is starting to look junky with no pride in making our community look clean and nice. We do not need more apartments or lower income housing. We need to take care of the homes we do have and make them look respectable and nice instead of looking like a ghetto town. New homes build should be single family quality homes, not cheap track homes that don’t age well. 9/13/2024 3:09 PM
77 Old significant, historic, downtown buildings upper floor(s) should be renovated for luxury condos. Owner-occupied preferred.
9/13/2024 10:43 AM
78 Additional units on large lots. Small “in-law” additions or ADU. More single family homes developed at a price affordable to “first time buyers” Well placed apartment complexes to expand housing options.
9/13/2024 9:29 AM
79 We need housing but we also need parking options downtown 9/12/2024 10:08 PM 80 N/A 9/12/2024 8:53 PM
81 The problem I am concerned with is that Oakdale has a good quality of living with lower crime rate than any other town in Stanislaus county and that could change with multi units housing like apartments because that’s what attracts ( unfortunately) more crime 9/12/2024 8:38 PM
82 NA 9/12/2024 5:17 PM
566
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
16 / 24
83 None 9/12/2024 3:52 PM
84 My opinion is this. I think we’ve made about all the parking adjustments, curbs here, curbs there. Everything is already used. We can’t create more space for everyday living. But, someone keeps thinking it’s ok to build more housing. There’s no where else to make parking, accessible to all. We’re already a bustling city with more people than it was meant to accommodate. We’re squeezing water out of a rock at this point. I love our lil town but it’s about all I can do to drive around it anymore. Too many people anymore. And no where to go.
Sad but true.
9/12/2024 12:14 PM
85 Modify large homes to allow more people 9/12/2024 11:52 AM 86 Additional units on large lots 9/12/2024 10:27 AM
87 We need housing for lower income working families to rent and for first time buyers. 9/12/2024 9:15 AM 88 Additional units on large lots 9/12/2024 8:00 AM
89 None. We need more schools.. 9/11/2024 10:21 PM
90 Non of the above 9/11/2024 8:02 PM
91 Yes to all those suggestions 9/11/2024 8:00 PM
92 Detached garages. Large homes and lots modified to add residential accomodation 9/11/2024 6:53 PM 93 Detached garage converted to house 9/11/2024 4:59 PM 94 Commercial and industrial converted to housing. Magnolia school is super old and falling apart it will need repairs if we continue to not build a school to replace it. 9/11/2024 3:33 PM
95 No, we are not a large scale town, and we shouldn’t endeavor to be. In doing so we will become another run down place. Unless the housing and commercial is growth for flourishing I’d say don’t go forward. If there are plans to create a lovely growing atmosphere and preserve and enhance oakdale as we go, it will likely become a town that people who care for their homes move out of. Modesto became that for us. We would move from here as well. What is Oakdale? What do the decision makers intend to change? Is it good, or will it ruin the town? That’s what is important. Protect and make Oakdale a healthy and lovely place or join the cities of ruin? It’s a serious concern, and question. This will make or break a good town for better or worse. And it’s important. What services are struggling already? Would all growth cause flourishing for the citizens, or a worse condition to be sorry about. These are the real issues to take seriously. Thanks for asking. We moved here 4 years ago from Modesto and I’ve grown a bit concerned with the conditions changing even in 4 years. Much of these are state driven problems. If we can navigate them tho the best for the benefit of a flourishing place, ok, if not, we need to be wise, slow and careful considering our town and future. We’re very thankful to live here, let’s be careful and thoughtful to not go the way of Modesto. 9/11/2024 2:32 PM
96 Commercial areas converted to allow residential living 9/11/2024 1:55 PM 97 No multi family housing 9/11/2024 1:10 PM
98 None of the above 9/11/2024 12:24 PM
99 Detached garages would be ideal for conversion as not many people use them for their intended purpose which is parking. Other than that Oakdale really does not have any “unique” features.
9/11/2024 10:06 AM
100 housing within walking distance of local businesses. Providing a safer way to cross major roads like F street by lowering the speed limit and giving bump outs at pedestrians crossing. 9/11/2024 9:31 AM
101 Multi family housing 9/11/2024 5:26 AM
102 River frontage mixed use possible 9/10/2024 8:39 PM 103 If you can afford to live in Oakdale, then live here; if you can’t, then go where you can afford to live.
9/10/2024 6:40 PM
104 None of the above listed. 9/10/2024 3:50 PM
105 Large homes modified for more residence and Commetcial and industrial area converted to housing
9/10/2024 3:31 PM
567
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
17 / 24
106 Across from hunts 9/10/2024 2:56 PM
107 Detached garages later converted in to housing. 9/10/2024 11:05 AM 108 Large lots converted to more housing. 9/10/2024 10:35 AM 109 Homes on a decent lot. Not five or 6,000 square feet. And there are very few alleys and the houses are built so close together. You can do your dishes and watch your neighbor's TV.
Privacy and space between homes.
9/10/2024 8:14 AM
110 I disagree with all of these options. People move to oakdale for the small town feel. By adding apartments and condos and converting large old home to multiplex or multi families homes with ruin this city and cause more harm than good.
9/10/2024 6:54 AM
111 Bigger lot size 9/9/2024 11:04 PM
112 All of these types of housing could help Oakdale’s housing crisis. We need to allow more density and actually incentivize developers to build. If it doesn’t make fiscal sense or if the city staff/council make it more difficult for developers to bring projects to fruition, they will take their business elsewhere.
9/9/2024 10:55 PM
113 Commercial and industrial areas converted into housing 9/9/2024 7:40 PM 114 Maybe tiny homes can be an option. Something like that. 9/9/2024 7:13 PM 115 More affordable micro units. Look how the mobile home park basically built those tiny homes and got rid of the trailers. I do property management for over 30 years on this town. Need smaller, affordable units.
9/9/2024 7:12 PM
116 Unless we’re going to do something about the fact that we have to drive to other cities for most shopping, I don’t think we need to add more housing at all. 9/9/2024 6:17 PM
117 Creating ADUs 9/9/2024 5:59 PM
118 Additional units on large lots 9/9/2024 4:50 PM
119 Convert empty commercial space into low income rentals. 9/9/2024 2:50 PM 120 All of the above sound feasible 9/9/2024 12:59 PM
121 No more housing until we have retail choices for current residents. 9/9/2024 11:22 AM 122 Garage housing 9/9/2024 11:21 AM
123 More affordable options for people who are struggling to make ends meet. The working poor are ending up in their cars and living out of storage lockers. 9/9/2024 10:14 AM
124 I don’t know 9/9/2024 9:00 AM
125 It’s not over populated and not large enough to increase population 9/9/2024 8:28 AM 126 Build more single family, moderate priced, homes on the west and south of Oakdale using existing vacant land.
9/9/2024 5:35 AM
127 Manufactured homes. Single rooms, micro homes for homeless 9/8/2024 9:44 PM 128 Industrial lots converted into multiplexes 9/8/2024 7:20 PM 129 Reduce Fees, Common Sense Building Inspectors without agendas. Simple structures with less inside mandatory features. KISS fees& Delays cost builders dearly. Attitudes need to change in Oakdale against builders & small GCs.
9/8/2024 5:38 PM
130 Not sure 9/8/2024 4:24 PM
131 Access according to the needs of the community. Granted the need for affordable housing is needed, but let us not forget all ranges of groups within the spectrum. 9/8/2024 12:56 PM
132 I feel we have more than plenty of housing in Oakdale and I am not in favor of adding additional to our small town.
9/8/2024 12:54 PM
133 We do not need the crime that follows low income housing. There are plenty of affordable options in Stanislaus county and if we open up more low income housing, we will see a spike in crime and urban decay.
9/8/2024 11:44 AM
568
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
18 / 24
134 Oakdale needs to avoid the trap of affordable housing. Affordable housing attracts crime, just look at all the other cities in our area with large amounts of affordable housing and compare their crime rates. Ceres, Empire, Modesto, Keys, Waterford, Riverbank, Salida, and Turlock all have plenty of low income housing. They can keep the crime. 9/8/2024 11:38 AM
135 I think ADUs could be a good idea to allow multi-generation family's to stay together in Oakdale. I am against adding lower income housing as it tends to cause a spike in crime.
Oakdale is one of the last good family cities in this great valley. There are plenty of affordable areas nearby in Turlock, Modesto, Riverbank, Jamestown, and Salida. All those areas have a higher level of crime than Oakdale. Oakdale needs to focus on middle class families. 9/8/2024 11:25 AM
136 Large empty plots of land that could be used as apartments/condos built on top of new restaurants, grocery options, and shopping, particularly on the far western side of the city (for example, the intersection of Crane and HWY 108).
9/8/2024 10:55 AM
137 N/a 9/8/2024 10:26 AM
138 Kmart 9/8/2024 9:13 AM
139 More town homes would be nice. 9/8/2024 8:27 AM
140 Location to activities, boating skiing etc 9/8/2024 6:47 AM 141 Conversions for sure, and definitely additional units on large lots. Stop building these giant houses. Smaller, more affordable homes please!
9/7/2024 5:14 PM
142 Live work housing. Tied to transportation. Converting commercial land will cost the city valuable tax dollars that homes do not provide. Allowing for large homes to accommodate more residents will contribute to the parking nightmare that already exists in the residential neighborhoods.
9/7/2024 4:18 PM
143 Oakdale should limit the number of apartment units being built in favor of single family homes - maintain our small town lifestyle.
9/7/2024 1:54 PM
144 Allowing existing homes to put tiny houses on their properties to accommodate multigenerational living.9/7/2024 1:50 PM 145 Commercial and industrial area that are no longer used be converted to housing. If appropriate. 9/7/2024 1:24 PM 146 Detached garages& other structures converted into housing 9/7/2024 12:36 PM 147 Additional units on large lot 9/7/2024 12:06 PM
148 I don’t know 9/7/2024 10:34 AM
149 There are several undeveloped areas throughout the Oakdale area that can be used to build single family dwellings.
9/7/2024 10:15 AM
150 Detached garage conversion to living quarters 9/7/2024 9:59 AM 151 stop calling Oakdale "The Cowboy Capital of the World " 9/7/2024 9:23 AM 152 Keep Oakdale small! 9/7/2024 9:09 AM
153 Not only affordable housing but a grocery store on the west side of Oakdale. There is nothing here and people living on the west side have to travel across town to go to a grocery store or take their money and shop in Riverbank.
9/7/2024 8:54 AM
154 Housing opportunities for all types and family configurations. 9/7/2024 8:27 AM 155 All you have listed are unique features of Oakdale. this WHOLE survey contains only the answers the Government wants??? seems one sided
9/7/2024 7:24 AM
156 Keep in mind, Oakdale has limited water resources. You can only pump so much ground water before the ground starts sinking and reservoirs become damaged. Also, don't penalize existing home owners with fees and infrastructure improvement costs that benefit the developers and new home owners.
9/7/2024 7:01 AM
157 Land 9/6/2024 10:34 PM
158 Recreation !! Family community keep your communism out of it !! Are you stupid ??? Retards 9/6/2024 10:25 PM 569
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
19 / 24
159 Large homes modified to accommodate more residents and multi family housing locations.
Also, a nice splash pad in some of the more desirable parts of town to attract more families.
Oh, and let's bring in some more shopping options to keep the locals spending their money here and not in Riverbank or Modesto.
9/6/2024 9:01 PM
160 Multi-family units Additional dwellings on large properties 9/6/2024 7:36 PM 161 New construction, make land more attractive to buyers by decreasing taxes on private industry in the construction sector. Growth is the only way to accommodate the increasing population 9/6/2024 6:57 PM
162 Prices go down for renters 9/6/2024 6:32 PM
163 Additional units on large lots. More multi family housing. More housing in general to bring prices of homes down.
9/6/2024 6:01 PM
164 More tiny home communities family friendly where young families can thrive 9/6/2024 5:59 PM 165 Less restrictions on ADUs and required permits. Allow garages, etc to be converted. Make it easier to build ADUs on large lots.
9/6/2024 5:48 PM
166 • Commercial and industrial area converted to housing 9/6/2024 5:40 PM 167 Demo old Kmart and develop new mixed use multifamily 9/6/2024 5:32 PM 168 Additional housing on large lota 9/6/2024 5:25 PM
169 Properties on acreage where only one residence is permitted. Allow for additional rental properties to be constructed by owners.
9/6/2024 4:51 PM
170 Additional housing on large lots; Accessory structures converted to housing 9/6/2024 4:35 PM 171 Large lots- be a town with yards! 9/6/2024 4:08 PM
172 Build smaller homes like before. 3 bed 2 bath we don’t need all these huge homes. We’re a small town
9/6/2024 4:00 PM
173 Don't agree with any of the above unless it includes more duplex units. 9/6/2024 3:52 PM 174 Oakdale needs retail and sadly I believe this survey is going to be manipulated to take retail zoned area near Crane Road. Why the parking question I have no confidence in city will do the right thing your past history of incompetence is sad.
9/6/2024 3:29 PM
175 My son's moved back and my sister lives with us. I am a "MULTIFAMILY HOME" already! I do wonder when I go grocery shopping how do the young kids make it? I don't see a lot of big businesses opening here? So because we have some undeveloped land the State wants us to build more low income housing on it so they can tell everyone how nice they are? I am not a rich guy, just getting by. How is having more people here with less money then me, help me? I believe more older folks like me would maybe feel less safe here in Oakdale? THAT'S NOT WHY IN MOVED HERE! I could have stayed in the BAY AREA! It's one thing to keep people out because of race, color, creed, but low income?(how low is low?) Are they Government subsidized? We all have compassion for these people, I was one once! But I also wonder about mine and my families safety? I worked my butt off to have what I have. If they can afford to live here GREAT! That's called AMERICA! The "MARKET ALWAYS BALANCES THINGS OUT"!
9/6/2024 3:15 PM
176 Not sure 9/6/2024 1:01 PM
177 Additional units on large lots and tiny/small second homes on residential lots 9/6/2024 12:59 PM 178 None of the above . Way too many people here already and you do nothing about the traffic . 9/6/2024 12:06 PM 179 More housing to the south and west of town. 9/6/2024 10:56 AM 180 Unfortunately it’s the economy and the state that make housing really difficult everywhere. But there is a STRONG need for low-income workers, single parents, and low-income retirees(60+) rentals here in town. We NEED more affordable duplexes, single story apartments, large structures converted into housing such as studio apartments. Most people just want a well maintained roof over their head with the needed minimal utilities. They don’t need fancy kitchen countertops, high end appliances, walk-in closets, soaking bathtubs, expanded garages, etc. This town would benefit so much to help those who do not qualify for any 9/6/2024 10:41 AM
570
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
20 / 24
benefits because they just barely make too much and yet the cost of living vs income keeps them from being able to afford a rental and/or have a large sum deposit. 181 Keep Oakdale as it stands 9/6/2024 10:39 AM
182 Vacant property north of Sconza would be perfect for gated apartment complexes 9/6/2024 10:11 AM 183 ?? 9/6/2024 8:39 AM
184 Additional units on large lots. 9/6/2024 8:27 AM
185 Empty commercial areas converted into housing. House the homeless, get them mental health. Start with those with children, the young families. They are living in their cars and their children are attending our schools. We need to do better! 9/6/2024 7:25 AM
186 I think we need a combination of all the above. I also think we need to keep improving the older sections of town such as lighting, cross walks, sidewalks. 9/6/2024 6:18 AM
187 Multi-family housing 9/5/2024 8:59 PM
188 NA 9/5/2024 7:54 PM
189 Multigenerational housing 9/5/2024 7:38 PM
190 None of the above. 9/5/2024 7:26 PM
191 There’s enough housing, give us some stores to shop in or you will be losing people moving here at all!!!!
9/5/2024 6:43 PM
192 No more mobile home parks instead RV parks with water and electric hook up In a permanent way, like a mobile home park, but can more easily be removed when an occupant moves and a slot opens up
9/5/2024 6:29 PM
193 Unsure 9/5/2024 6:03 PM
194 NA 9/5/2024 5:59 PM
195 Additional units on large lots 9/5/2024 5:54 PM
196 Smaller more affordable homes not concentrated in one area. Retail development on the west side of town ie crane rd area
9/5/2024 5:52 PM
197 None if people want to work and get off the system they can find and buy/rent homes just fine.
If you make homes cheaper. People who bought at the peak of the market will let them for close and get a cheaper home.
9/5/2024 5:22 PM
198 Housing closer to shopping areas to reduce vehicle traffic 9/5/2024 5:05 PM 199 If the land isn’t being used for anything specific then apartments and/or cheaper homes should be built there. If there is a vacant business lot that isn’t being used then it should be torn down and converted for residential development.
9/5/2024 4:56 PM
200 I think more opportunities for granny units would be great if it were subsidized in some way, as the cost is too expensive for most people.
9/5/2024 4:39 PM
201 Preserve Oakdale's small town neighborhood feel by not overbuilding and adding too many multi-family structures.
9/5/2024 4:35 PM
202 Keep people out of the town and support the current local infrastructure this is a joke you are looking for people to support your looney dreams of putting apartments downtown disgusting 9/5/2024 4:04 PM
203 Keep with the wider roads like we have in older developments - new housing developments are so close together.
9/5/2024 4:03 PM
204 n/a 9/5/2024 3:56 PM
205 Small bungalows, garden apartments with a common courtyard, common wall townhouses, small arts & crafts entry level housing and it’s time to enforce the 20-25% affordable housing regulations that force the developers to build the affordable housing IN their housing tracts.
And not just 2and 4 plexes. Look at the NW quadrant of Oakdale that includes Magnolia School and the Old Hispital. You find mansions next to small 1 & 2 room houses next to medium size single family next to small duplexes and four plexes. It’s not so hard if our City 9/5/2024 3:34 PM
571
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
21 / 24
Council members and building department had any balls AND THEY DON’T! Mike Brennan was the last one they carried any of these ideas and he was voted down time and again.
Residential over commercial which has happened forever in large cities and once happened in Oakdale’s early history is an easy fix with the right council members I place. 206 Multi family units in east Oakdale Apartments downtown above businesses 9/5/2024 3:17 PM 207 Converted detached garages 9/5/2024 3:08 PM
208 More affordable housing 9/5/2024 2:51 PM
209 To many houses for out of towners who want to change out town. Not enough for locals 9/5/2024 2:10 PM 210 Detached garages converted into additional housing. Sustain single story family residence in separate zones from apartment unit complexes.
9/5/2024 1:52 PM
211 We live close to downtown, and have a yard with grass and trees, a single car driveway that will accommodate several cars, and we still have parking for 2 cars on the street in front of the house. New development often have no yards, no street parking, yet have 3, 4, or 5 bedrooms, with no outdoor space for large families or nowhere for anyone to park. If we go with multigenerational housing, lots must be bigger, parking must be adequate, parks must be nearby, and some sort of space for limited retail. Many of the ideas to add more people to existing space, does nothing for the quality of life and you are just creating more of an urban feel in what many still call a small town. When we moved here in the mid 80’s for work, it was a one stoplight town and we are not that anymore.
9/5/2024 11:41 AM
212 None 9/5/2024 11:39 AM
213 More affordable single homes. 9/5/2024 10:57 AM
214 Parking must be supplied by owners. Ex: 4 adults 2 parking spaces, 2 on apt. Property & 2 can park on street. Mandatory.
9/5/2024 10:19 AM
215 Farm/Ranch housing for employees of that business 9/5/2024 9:54 AM 216 Oakdale needs commercial shopping places not more housing. 8/31/2024 11:44 AM 217 No answer 8/30/2024 5:19 PM
218 I believe owkdale could be just like Rippon if they would just develop bike paths we do not need More apartments it just brings in a different element. Owkdale is known for its Ranchettes and small home filling. We need to focus on downtown and annexing in the areas that are already developed. We need more bike paths. we do not need a large development off Sterns Road
8/26/2024 4:34 PM
219 All of the options create parking concerns. 8/22/2024 10:05 PM 220 All of these options will create excessive influx of motor vehicles and by extension, parking issues.
8/22/2024 10:03 PM
221 All of these options create parking problems. 8/22/2024 10:02 PM 222 All of these options create parking problems. 8/22/2024 10:02 PM 223 All of these options create parking problems and density concerns 8/22/2024 10:02 PM 224 I believe that new apartment complexes should be three stories in order to allow more housing opportunities while preserving space for parks, businesses, and agriculture. We should be building vertically.
8/22/2024 9:07 PM
225 Stop building and be more like Escalon but when you have a self promoting mayor who eats up all the attention given to her. Let's build more houses and have more people come to town so we can waste money on another downtown project so people will come spend money but not have a place to park or only be aloud to spend money for 2 hours because we aren't aloud to park any longer
8/22/2024 7:15 AM
226 None, as any will trigger reassessment of property and raise the taxes causing more people not to be able to afford or charge higher rents. Would also increase the need for parking in these areas that were never meant to be for that many people. 8/21/2024 3:39 AM
227 New construction should not be allowed to make such tiny lots for so many reasons, social, 8/20/2024 9:50 PM 572
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
22 / 24
fire safety, privacy. Families should have the option to expand their house or add a granny unit, or for goodness sake, playground equipment in their own backyards. I personally live on a culdesac lot, so it’s 15’ to the fence from my bedroom. Fifteen feet from the neighbor’s barking dogs, at all hours of the morning and night or if I drop a bar of soap in the shower. Fifteen feet from giant redwoods. Small lots do not make good neighbors. This may not be the correct space for these comments, but I don’t know whether there will be another spot later in the survey.
228 Commercial conversion 8/20/2024 7:10 PM
229 There’s large lots of vacant land around Oakdale that can be used to bud more affordable homes instead of more expensive McMansions like in the Vineyards and Bridal Ridge.
Additionally there’s several vacant homes in bad condition throughout the city that could be fined into compliance to either turn into rentals, sell or demolish and rebuild multi family homes on the lots.
8/20/2024 10:58 AM
230 ADUs in town. Safer options for young adults just starting out, single professionals, seniors trying to stay independent but need some socialization and/or care. 8/20/2024 8:44 AM
231 Ag land is not for housing, build multi unit dwellings in the already established neighborhoods.
Up not out.
8/20/2024 5:23 AM
232 All of the above, with latter consideration being multi-use; commercial business below with owners having apartment above. This could be very beneficial in the downtown area. 8/19/2024 11:06 PM
233 Allowing mother in law suites in housing developments that have room. New housing developments be planned with in law suites or air bnb to be rented out. Repair areas above existing businesses that already exist
8/19/2024 10:01 PM
234 Converting upper levels of downtown buildings Studio Apartments for younger residents. 8/19/2024 9:45 PM 235 Micro houses added to larger single unit lots 8/19/2024 8:58 PM 236 Additional units on large lots 8/19/2024 8:55 PM
237 Additional units on large lots. Many of the older areas have large lots but not permitted to build more units.
8/19/2024 8:06 PM
238 Turn larger homes into multi-unit studios or 1 bedroom apts. Restore the 2nd floors of the downtown buildings into multi-unit 1 or 2 bdrm apts. Tiny home park. 8/19/2024 7:35 PM
239 Keep Oakdale small! Quit building more houses, apartments, multi family houses period.
Oakdale needs to put a moratorium on building period. Keep the homeless out & all the bay area riff raff.
8/19/2024 7:03 PM
240 More houses with low prices 8/19/2024 6:17 PM
241 No more new builds. Rehabilitation of current areas. No expansion in any direction. Oakdale takes pride in being a small town, but more housing will continue to take away from that. 8/19/2024 6:13 PM
242 1 ADU on lots in excess of 10,000 square feet. 8/19/2024 4:53 PM 243 Modified homes to accommodate more families 8/19/2024 4:36 PM 244 N/A 8/19/2024 4:22 PM
245 ADU’s would be helpful in easing housing issues. Streamline the process, and help people understand the benefits of an ADU
8/19/2024 4:12 PM
246 Additional units on large lots, Commercial and Industrial area converted to housing 8/19/2024 4:10 PM 247 More multifamily homes 8/19/2024 4:01 PM
248 Locations for multi family housing 8/19/2024 3:43 PM 249 Small town feel! Not a lot of apartments and feel we do not need any more low income apartments due to the size of our city. Townhomes on J street used to be nice new housing and now they look horrible. Let’s keep our city clean and well managed 8/19/2024 3:18 PM
250 Additional units on large lots 8/19/2024 3:10 PM
251 None. 8/19/2024 3:06 PM
573
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
23 / 24
252 Commercial area to become multi family home space 8/19/2024 3:06 PM 253 Not sure- more restrictions on trash in front of a home/business/empty lot. More restrictions on vehicles in those places too.
8/19/2024 2:51 PM
254 Commercial converted housing Additional units on large lots 8/19/2024 2:42 PM 255 Commercial and industrial area converted to housing and locations for multi-family housing 8/19/2024 2:34 PM 256 Garage conversion only for immediate relatives of homeowner occupied main residence.
Otherwise, you are just dropping mini apartment buildings throughout residential neighborhoods.
8/19/2024 2:33 PM
257 N/a 8/19/2024 2:23 PM
258 I don't feel like there is a housing issue in Oakdale. Please don't become another Livermore and lose the small time vibe. Don't do it!!
8/19/2024 2:17 PM
259 I see what your trying to do. There is a large amount of land on west side set for retail and your trying to grab some for housing which is unwise. Bring in retail like you promised. 8/19/2024 2:14 PM
260 Oakdale does not need any more apartments or low income properties. This will only increase crime!
8/19/2024 2:10 PM
261 Multi use would be very welcome. Apartments above businesses just seems logical. ADUs on larger lots, apartments above garages, tiny home parks. The key is affordable and a surplus makes things affordable.
8/19/2024 2:09 PM
262 Additional units, detached garages 8/19/2024 2:06 PM 263 Commercial and industrial area converted to housing. 8/19/2024 2:05 PM 264 Keep our town small 8/19/2024 1:59 PM
265 Way too many new homes being built in Oakdale. The traffic now is horrible. Let's take care of our Seniors who are born and raised here should be priority not these bay area transplants! I am sick of the rude drivers and speeding on any given day around town. This town can do better.
8/19/2024 1:56 PM
266 I agree with all of the things mentioned above and also to remove the two story limit 8/19/2024 1:48 PM 267 No work to many people in small town Oakdale … 8/19/2024 1:32 PM 268 I do think detached garages turned into ADUs would be nice and better than apartments being built
8/19/2024 1:27 PM
269 None. leave it alone. dont turn oakdale into stockton 8/19/2024 1:26 PM 270 Additional units on larger lots or allowing people who have acres let their families build house on them
8/19/2024 1:20 PM
271 Not sure 8/19/2024 1:13 PM
272 Not sure 8/19/2024 1:11 PM
273 Multi family family 8/19/2024 1:07 PM
274 Commercial and industrial converted to housing. Downtown apartments over existing businesses. But they need to be inhabitable … not like the ones over the H-B 8/19/2024 1:00 PM
275 Empty k-mart building would bring more jobs to Oakdale 8/19/2024 12:59 PM 276 Commercial buildings which have large corporate companies. Bring money to Oakdale. All we are doing is bringing low income and all the problems that come with it without ha ing the benefit of a large corporate company that pays taxes to Oakdale. Riverbank is killing it and a lot of Oakdale money is going there. Its insane.
8/19/2024 12:56 PM
277 Housing is maxed out traffic can not handle a larger population 8/19/2024 12:56 PM 278 How can we build more housing when all you have in town is grocery stores. Why don’t you focus on getting other things in town instead of more people that are not being policed. 8/19/2024 12:50 PM
574
City of Oakdale Housing Needs and Opportunities Survey
24 / 24
279 Additional units on large lots 8/19/2024 12:48 PM
280 All the above are great ideas. Just need more units, period 8/19/2024 12:46 PM 281 Mother in law quarters, addl units on large lots. 8/19/2024 12:16 PM 282 ADUs 8/19/2024 11:34 AM
283 We need more duplexes that have a yard enough for Animals to run 8/16/2024 5:55 PM 284 None- please stop! Especially the lower income housing. The quality of our town is drastically going down the more housing we build and especially with the more low income housing we build. Our small town is can’t handle more homes without businesses to support basic needs.
We are losing our small town feel.
8/13/2024 8:20 AM
285 Detached garages and ADU's 8/13/2024 7:47 AM
286 I’m not sure 8/13/2024 7:42 AM
287 Oakdale needs to focus on providing SFH on larger lots. Lot sizes are becoming smaller and smaller and people are having to pay a premium to not live right on top of one another. Comfort shouldn’t be a luxury accommodation.
8/13/2024 7:42 AM
288 None 8/9/2024 8:48 AM
289 I think that fixing up the streets and sidewalks in the older neighborhoods downtown can really improve living and encourage people to buy in that area and renovate those houses. Adding more apartments and duplexes will only encourage more people from Modesto and surrounding areas to move into Oakdale and make it harder those of us who are from here in terms of traffic and finding places to live. Oakdale is known for its small town charm and I believe it would be in Oakdales best interest to cater to that as well the people who are local to Oakdale by beautifying neighborhoods that have been neglected such as those near the highschool. We do not need more people. We need to make the quality of life in Oakdale better for those who already live here.
8/4/2024 8:04 PM
290 New homes 🏡 7/31/2024 12:39 PM
291 Additional units on Large lots. locations for multifamily homes. new smaller entry level homes/townhouses or condos
7/31/2024 8:57 AM
292 Not sure 7/30/2024 8:13 AM
293 N/A 7/24/2024 2:05 PM
575
Encuesta sobre Necesidades y Oportunidades de Vivienda - Oakdale 1 / 8
75.00% 3
50.00% 2
50.00% 2
50.00% 2
50.00% 2
25.00% 1
50.00% 2
25.00% 1
0.00% 0
Q1 Las más grandes necesidades de vivienda de Oakdale hoy son (seleccione todas las opciones que apliquen):
Answered: 4 Skipped: 0
Total Respondents: 4
# OTRO (ESPECIFIQUE) DATE
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Necesita
opciones de
vivienda en...
Necesita
vivienda para
personas de ...
Necesita
vivienda en
renta y a ba...
Necesita casas
que sean más
asequibles p...
Necesita
vivienda para
gente que...
Necesita más
vivienda para
familias...
Necesita más
opciones de
vivienda par...
Todas las
necesidades de
vivienda en...
Otro
(especifique)
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Necesita opciones de vivienda en precios más bajos
Necesita vivienda para personas de la tercera edad
Necesita vivienda en renta y a bajo costo
Necesita casas que sean más asequibles para compradores de primera vez Necesita vivienda para gente que trabaja aquí
Necesita más vivienda para familias jóvenes y trabajadores Necesita más opciones de vivienda para familias multigeneracionales Todas las necesidades de vivienda en Oakdale han sido satisfechas Otro (especifique)
576
Encuesta sobre Necesidades y Oportunidades de Vivienda - Oakdale 2 / 8
There are no responses.
75.00% 3
75.00% 3
75.00% 3
75.00% 3
100.00% 4
0.00% 0
Q2 Las necesidades de Oakdale de vivienda dentro de los próximos 10 años incluirá (seleccione toda opción que aplique):
Answered: 4 Skipped: 0
Total Respondents: 4
# OTRO (ESPECIFIQUE) DATE
There are no responses.
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Vivienda a
precio
accesible pa...
Negocios
necesitarán
vivienda...
Vivienda a
precio para
atraer nueva...
Casas viejas
se deteriorarán
y necesitará...
Nuestra
población en
envejecimien...
Otro
(especifique)
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Vivienda a precio accesible para que adultos jóvenes puedan vivir aquí Negocios necesitarán vivienda asequible para sus empleados Vivienda a precio para atraer nuevas familias a Oakdale Casas viejas se deteriorarán y necesitarán reparaciones Nuestra población en envejecimiento necesitará opciones de vivienda más accesible y bien diseñada Otro (especifique)
Q3 Por favor categorice su nivel de acuerdo con cada una de las siguientes declaraciones:
Answered: 4 Skipped: 0
577
Encuesta sobre Necesidades y Oportunidades de Vivienda - Oakdale 3 / 8
No hay casas a
nivel de
entrada para...
Los precios de
renta están muy
altos en...
Algunas de las
casas viejas de
Oakdale...
Mis hijos no
pueden cubrir
el costo de...
No hay
suficientes
opciones de...
Algunos
adultos mayores
necesitan...
Oakdale
debería
permitir la...
578
Encuesta sobre Necesidades y Oportunidades de Vivienda - Oakdale 4 / 8
Es importante
preservar los
vecindarios ...
Mis costos de
vivienda han
incrementado...
Gente que
trabaja en
Oakdale no...
Oakdale
necesita más
opciones de...
Oakdale
necesita más
vivienda cer...
Oakdale
necesita
permitir más...
Oakdale
necesita más
vivienda en...
579
Encuesta sobre Necesidades y Oportunidades de Vivienda - Oakdale 5 / 8
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
En Desacue… Neutral/ N… De Acuerdo
Oakdale
debería
permitir la...
Oakdale
debería
permitir la...
Oakdale
necesita más
desarrollo d...
Oakdale
debería reducir
los requisit...
580
Encuesta sobre Necesidades y Oportunidades de Vivienda - Oakdale 6 / 8
33.33%
1 66.67%
2 0.00%
0 3 2.33
0.00%
0 0.00%
0 100.00%
4 4 1.00
0.00%
0 0.00%
0 100.00%
4 4 1.00
0.00%
0 50.00%
2 50.00%
2 4 1.50
25.00%
1 0.00%
0 75.00%
3 4 1.50
0.00%
0 25.00%
1 75.00%
3 4 1.25
0.00%
0 50.00%
2 50.00%
2 4 1.50
0.00%
0 0.00%
0 100.00%
4 4 1.00
0.00%
0 0.00%
0 100.00%
4 4 1.00
0.00%
0 0.00%
0 100.00%
4 4 1.00
0.00%
0 25.00%
1 75.00%
3 4 1.25
25.00%
1 25.00%
1 50.00%
2 4 1.75
25.00%
1 75.00%
3 0.00%
0 4 2.25
50.00%
2 50.00%
2 0.00%
0 4 2.50
0.00%
0 25.00%
1 75.00%
3 4 1.25
25.00%
1 0.00%
0 75.00%
3 4 1.50
0.00%
0 50.00%
2 50.00%
2 4 1.50
0.00%
0 0.00%
0 100.00%
4 4 1.00
EN
DESACUERDO
NEUTRAL/
NO
OPINION
DE
ACUERDO
TOTAL WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
No hay casas a nivel de entrada para comprar en Oakdale Los precios de renta están muy altos en Oakdale
Algunas de las casas viejas de Oakdale necesitan
rehabilitación
Mis hijos no pueden cubrir el costo de vivir en Oakdale No hay suficientes opciones de vivienda en Oakdale
Algunos adultos mayores necesitan asistencia para
permanecer en sus hogares
Oakdale debería permitir la construcción de más
apartamentos
Es importante preservar los vecindarios de Oakdale
Mis costos de vivienda han incrementado en los últimos 5 años
Gente que trabaja en Oakdale no pueden cobrar el costo
para vivir aquí
Oakdale necesita más opciones de vivienda para todos los niveles de ingreso
Oakdale necesita más vivienda cerca del Centro
Oakdale necesita permitir más vivienda junto con negocios existentes
Oakdale necesita más vivienda en áreas comerciales
Oakdale debería permitir la construcción de vivienda de cuatro unidades en la ciudad
Oakdale debería permitir la construcción de apartamentos pequeños en la ciudad
Oakdale necesita más desarrollo de usos mixtos
Oakdale debería reducir los requisitos de estacionamiento donde las condiciones de seguridad lo permitan
Q4 Por favor seleccione los tipos de vivienda que serían más exitosos en Oakdale:
Answered: 4 Skipped: 0
581
Encuesta sobre Necesidades y Oportunidades de Vivienda - Oakdale 7 / 8
75.00% 3
75.00% 3
25.00% 1
0.00% 0
25.00% 1
0.00% 0
Total Respondents: 4
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Vivienda
secundaria a la
residencia...
Vivienda para
personas de la
tercera edad...
Vivienda
unifamiliar
Covivienda,
micro-unidades,
y unidades d...
Vivienda
multifamiliar
Vivienda
intermedia
faltante com...
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Vivienda secundaria a la residencia principal (second units/granny units/junior units) Vivienda para personas de la tercera edad independiente y instalaciones de cuidado residencial para personas mayores o personas con discapacidades
Vivienda unifamiliar
Covivienda, micro-unidades, y unidades de una sola recámara Vivienda multifamiliar
Vivienda intermedia faltante como casas adosadas o vivienda de unidades múltiples de baja altura Q5 ¿Cuáles son algunas de las características únicas de Oakdale que pueden ser oportunidades de vivienda para la comunidad? Por ejemplo:
Ubicaciones para vivienda multifamiliar Garajes independientes y otras estructuras secundarias que podrían convertirse en viviendas. Casas grandes que pueden modificadarse para alojar más residentes Lotes grandes perfectos para alojar más residencias Espacios
comerciales/industriales subutilizados infrautilizados que podrían convertirse en viviendas Su(s) idea(s):
Answered: 0 Skipped: 4
# RESPONSES DATE
582
Encuesta sobre Necesidades y Oportunidades de Vivienda - Oakdale 8 / 8
There are no responses.
583
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Resolution 2026-XX
Attachment 6
HCD Subsequent Draft Review Letter, dated May 27, 2026
584
STATE OF CALIFORNIA - BUSINESS, CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIVISION OF HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT
651 Bannon Street, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95811
(916) 263-2911 / FAX (916) 263-7453
www.hcd.ca.gov
May 27, 2026
Jerry Ramar, City Manager
City of Oakdale
285 North Third Ave
Oakdale, CA 95361
Dear Jerry Ramar:
RE: Oakdale’s 6th Cycle (2023-2031) Revised Draft Housing Element Update Thank you for submitting the City of Oakdale’s (City) revised draft housing element received for review on April 2, 2026, along with revisions received on May 26, 2026.
The revisions were posted and made available for seven days prior to review. Pursuant to Government Code section 65585, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is reporting the results of its review. Our review was facilitated by a conversation on May 6, 2026 with the City’s consultants.
The revised draft element, including revisions, meets the statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law (Gov. Code, § 65580 et seq), including findings that were described in HCD’s December 5, 2025 review. However, the housing element cannot be found in substantial compliance until the City has completed the necessary rezones (see below) to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The housing element will substantially comply with State Housing Element Law when all necessary rezoning are completed and meet statutory requirements and the element is adopted, submitted to, and approved by HCD, in accordance with Government Code section 65585.
A jurisdiction that did not adopt a compliant housing element within 120 days from the statutory deadline (December 31, 2023) must rezone sites within one year of the statutory deadline and meet requirements pursuant to Government Code sections 65583, subdivision (c)(1)(A) and 65583.2, subdivisions (c), (h) and (i), as applicable. As this year has passed and Program 2-1 (Maintain Viable Sites) has not been completed, the housing element cannot be found in substantial compliance until rezoning has been completed to meet all statutory requirements. Once the City completes the rezoning, a copy of the resolution, ordinance or other related documentation should be submitted to HCD for review. Following this, HCD will issue correspondence regarding the status of the City’s housing element compliance.
585
Jerry Ramar, City Manager
In addition, please be aware, the California appellate decision in Martinez v. City of Clovis held that when a local government employs overlay zoning to accommodate its lower-income RHNA, both the base zone and the overlay zone must comply with the minimum density requirements of Government Code section 65583.2, subdivision (h).
Furthermore, New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach held that residential overlay zones cannot satisfy mandatory minimum density and residential use requirements of subdivision (h) when the underlying zoning allows for 100 percent nonresidential development on sites rezoned to accommodate the shortfall of lowerincome RHNA. The City should address impacts of these decisions on the current rezone strategy and adjust its rezoning accordingly to comply with Government Code section 65583.2, subdivision (h). (See Martinez v. City of Clovis 90 Cal.App.5th 193, 307 Cal.Rptr.3d 64 (2023); New Commune DTLA LLC v. City of Redondo Beach 115 Cal.App.5th 111, 337 Cal. Rptr. 3d 782 (2025).)
As a reminder, the City’s 6th cycle housing element was due December 31, 2023. As of today, the City has not completed the housing element process for the 6th cycle. The City’s 5th cycle housing element no longer satisfies statutory requirements. HCD encourages the City to expeditiously complete rezoning and adopt and submit the housing element to HCD to regain housing element compliance.
Public participation in the development, adoption and implementation of the housing element is essential to effective housing planning. Throughout the housing element process, the City must continue to engage the community, including organizations that represent lower-income and special needs households, by making information regularly available while considering and incorporating comments where appropriate. Please be aware, any revisions to the element must be posted on the local government’s website and to email a link to all individuals and organizations that have previously requested notices relating to the local government’s housing element at least seven days before submitting to HCD.
For your information, pursuant to Government Code section 65583.3, the City must submit an electronic sites inventory with its adopted housing element. The City must utilize standards, forms, and definitions adopted by HCD. Please see HCD’s housing element webpage at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/planning-and-communitydevelopment/housing-elements for a copy of the form and instructions. The City can reach out to HCD at [email protected] for technical assistance.
Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant, the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities programs, and HCD’s Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City will meet housing element requirements for these and other funding sources. 586
Jerry Ramar, City Manager
For your information, some general plan element updates are triggered by housing element adoption. HCD reminds the City to consider timing provisions and welcomes the opportunity to provide assistance. For information, please see the Technical Advisories issued by the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation at:
https://www.lci.ca.gov/planning/general-plan/guidelines.html.
HCD appreciates the hard work and dedication of the City of Oakdale, in preparation of the City’s housing element. HCD looks forward to receiving the City’s adopted housing element and welcomes the opportunity to provide technical assistance during the adoption and rezone process. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Sayed Murad, of our staff, at [email protected].
Sincerely,
Paul McDougall
Senior Program Manager
587
CITY OF OAKDALE
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Date: Monday, June 15, 2026
To: Mayor Bairos and Members of the City Council
From: Manuel Lopez, Public Services Manager
Reviewed by: Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
Subject: Consider a Resolution Adopting the City of Oakdale 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan.
BACKGROUND
The Urban Water Management Planning Act (California Water Code Sections 10610– 10657) requires urban water suppliers serving more than 3,000 connections or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually to prepare and adopt an Urban Water Management Plan every five years.
The City of Oakdale currently provides water service to approximately 8,335 service connections and a population of approximately 23,231 residents. In 2025, the City supplied approximately 4,826 acre-feet or 1,500,000,000 gallons of water to its customers.
The purpose of the UWMP is to evaluate current and projected water demands, assess available water supplies, identify conservation measures, and prepare for future water shortages and drought conditions. Adoption of the UWMP is required to maintain eligibility for certain State grants and low-interest loan programs.
The Water Shortage Contingency Plan is a required component of the UWMP and establishes six stages of water shortage response actions ranging from public outreach and voluntary conservation measures to mandatory restrictions during severe shortages.
DISCUSSION
The 2025 UWMP was prepared by Black Water Consulting Engineers in accordance with State requirements. The plan evaluates historical water use, projected future demands through 2045, water supply reliability, and drought preparedness.
Key findings include:
• The City supplied approximately 4,826 acre-feet of water during 2025. • Water demand is projected to increase modestly to approximately 5,032 acre-feet by 2045.
• The City’s water system is currently supplied by seven active groundwater wells. • Two additional municipal wells are planned to improve long-term reliability. • Surface water deliveries from Oakdale Irrigation District have begun serving Greger Sports Park and Bridle Ridge Dog Park and may be expanded to additional parks in the future.
AGENDA ITEM 10.6
588
CITY OF OAKDALE
City Council Staff Report (Continued)
SUBJECT: City of Oakdale 2025 Urban Water Management Plan MEETING DATE: Monday, June 15, 2026
• The City continues implementing conservation measures, water loss reduction projects, smart meters, public education programs, and system improvements to improve efficiency and reliability.
• The City currently exceeds its State water use reduction target and is actively implementing projects to improve compliance with future water loss standards.
Public notices regarding the preparation and adoption of the UWMP and WSCP were published in accordance with State law, and the documents have been made available for public review.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of the Urban Water Management Plan or Water Shortage Contingency Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Conduct a public hearing and adopt the attached resolution approving the City of Oakdale 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan and authorize staff to submit the plans to the California Department of Water Resources.
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Draft City Council Resolution 2026-__
Attachment B: 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan
589
IN THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF OAKDALE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2026-___
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CITY OF OAKDALE 2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN AND 2025 WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLAN AND
AUTHORIZING STAFF TO SUBMIT THE PLANS TO THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES
WHEREAS, the Urban Water Management Planning Act (California Water Code Sections 10610 through 10657) requires urban water suppliers to prepare and adopt an Urban Water Management Plan every five years; and
WHEREAS, the City of Oakdale is an urban water supplier subject to the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act; and
WHEREAS, the City has prepared the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan in accordance with State law; and WHEREAS, public notice of the availability of the plans and the public hearing was provided in accordance with California Water Code requirements; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on June 15, 2026, and considered all testimony and information presented regarding the proposed plans.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Oakdale that the attached 2025 Urban Water Management Plan and 2025 Water Shortage Contingency Plan are hereby approved and adopted, and staff is authorized to take all actions necessary to implement and submit the plans as required by law.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS HEREBY ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF JUNE, 2026, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
SIGNED:
Cherilyn Bairos, Mayor
ATTEST:
Patrick Mondragon, City Clerk
590
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
DRAFT
MAY 2026
Prepared for:
CITY OF OAKDALE
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
455 S. Fifth Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
(209) 845-3600
Prepared by:
BLACK WATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
602 Lyell Drive
Modesto, CA 95356
(209) 322-1820
591
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
i
CITY OF OAKDALE
2025 URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CONTACT SHEET
Date plan adopted: June 15, 2026
Jeff Gravel, Public Services Director
City of Oakdale
Phone: (209) 845-3600
Email: [email protected]
Jeff Roberts, Public Works Superintendent
City of Oakdale
Phone: (209) 845-3613
Email: [email protected]
Brad Clinkenbeard, Water Division Supervisor
City of Oakdale
Phone: (209) 872-4885
Email: [email protected]
Manuel Lopez, Public Services Manager (Water)
City of Oakdale
Phone: (209) 845-3600
Email: [email protected]
Alison Furuya, P.E., Vice President
Black Water Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Phone: (209) 322-1815
Email: [email protected]
Angel Mariscal, P.E., Project Manager
Black Water Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Phone: (209) 733-0555
Email: [email protected]
Andrew Ruiz, E.I.T., Assistant Engineer
Black Water Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Phone: (209) 488-4051
Email: [email protected]
592
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 UWMP Introduction and Lay Description .......................................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Background and Purpose ........................................................................................................... 1-1
1.2 Previous Urban Water Management Plan ................................................................................. 1-1
1.3 Urban Water Management Planning and the California Water Code ....................................... 1-1
1.3.1 Urban Water Management Planning Act of 1983 ............................................................. 1-2
1.3.2 Applicable Changes since the 2020 UWMP ....................................................................... 1-2
1.4 UWMPs in Relation to Other Planning Efforts ........................................................................... 1-3
1.5 UWMP Organization .................................................................................................................. 1-3
1.6 Lay Description ........................................................................................................................... 1-4 2 UWMP Preparation ............................................................................................................................ 2-1
2.1 Basis for Preparing a Plan .......................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1.1 Public Water Systems......................................................................................................... 2-1
2.2 Individual Planning and Compliance .......................................................................................... 2-2
2.3 Fiscal or Calendar Year and Units of Measure ........................................................................... 2-2
2.4 Coordination and Outreach ....................................................................................................... 2-3
2.4.1 Wholesale and Retail Coordination ................................................................................... 2-4
2.4.2 Coordination with Other Agencies and the Community .................................................... 2-4
2.4.3 Notice to Cities and Counties ............................................................................................. 2-5 3 Service Area Description .................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 General Description ................................................................................................................... 3-1
3.2 Service Area Boundary Maps ..................................................................................................... 3-2
3.3 Service Area Climate .................................................................................................................. 3-5
3.4 Service Area Population and Demographics .............................................................................. 3-6
3.4.1 Service Area Population ..................................................................................................... 3-6
3.4.2 Other Social, Economic, and Demographic Factors ........................................................... 3-6
3.5 Land Uses within Service Area ................................................................................................... 3-7 4 Water Use Characterization............................................................................................................... 4-1
4.1 Non-Potable versus Potable Water Use .................................................................................... 4-1
4.2 Past, Current, and Projected Water Use by Sector .................................................................... 4-1
4.2.1 Water Use Sectors Listed in Water Code ........................................................................... 4-2
4.2.2 Water Use Sectors in Addition to Those Listed in Water Code ......................................... 4-3
4.2.3 Past Water Use ................................................................................................................... 4-3
4.2.4 Current Water Use ............................................................................................................. 4-3
4.2.5 Projected Water Use .......................................................................................................... 4-5
4.2.6 Water Use for Lower Income Households ......................................................................... 4-7
4.2.7 Climate Change Considerations ......................................................................................... 4-9
4.3 Distribution System Water Losses ........................................................................................... 4-10
4.4 Progress Toward Meeting the Water Loss Performance Standard ......................................... 4-10 5 SB X7-7 Baselines, 2020 Targets, and 2025 Targeting ....................................................................... 5-1
5.1 Baseline and Target Calculations for 2025 UWMPs ................................................................... 5-1
5.2 Funding Eligibility ....................................................................................................................... 5-2 6 Water Supply Characterization .......................................................................................................... 6-1
6.1 UWMP Water Supply Characterization ...................................................................................... 6-1
6.1.1 Purchased or Imported Water ........................................................................................... 6-2 593
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
iii
6.1.2 Groundwater ...................................................................................................................... 6-2
6.1.3 Surface Water .................................................................................................................... 6-6
6.1.4 Stormwater ........................................................................................................................ 6-7
6.1.5 Wastewater and Recycled Water ...................................................................................... 6-7
6.1.6 Desalinated Water Opportunities .................................................................................... 6-14
6.1.7 Water Exchanges and Transfers ....................................................................................... 6-14
6.1.8 Supply from Storage ......................................................................................................... 6-14
6.1.9 Future Water Projects ...................................................................................................... 6-15
6.1.10 Summary of Existing and Planned Sources of Water ....................................................... 6-16
6.1.11 Special Conditions ............................................................................................................ 6-19
6.2 Energy Use ............................................................................................................................... 6-19 7 Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment ................................................................... 7-1
7.1 Constraints on Water Sources ................................................................................................... 7-1
7.1.1 Legal ................................................................................................................................... 7-1
7.1.2 Environmental .................................................................................................................... 7-2
7.1.3 Water Quality ..................................................................................................................... 7-2
7.1.4 Climatic Factors .................................................................................................................. 7-2
7.2 Water Service Reliability Assessment (WSRA) ........................................................................... 7-2
7.2.1 WSRA Year-Type Characterization ..................................................................................... 7-2
7.2.2 Service Reliability – Supply and Demand Comparison ....................................................... 7-4
7.2.3 Description of Management Tools and Options ................................................................ 7-6
7.3 Drought Risk Assessment ........................................................................................................... 7-7
7.3.1 DRA Data, Methods, and Basis for Water Shortage Conditions ........................................ 7-7
7.3.2 DRA Water Source Reliability ............................................................................................. 7-7
7.3.3 Total Water Supply and Use Comparison .......................................................................... 7-8 8 Water Shortage Contingency Plan ..................................................................................................... 8-1 9 Demand Management Measures ...................................................................................................... 9-1
9.1 Report Implementation ............................................................................................................. 9-1
9.1.1 Implementation over the Past Five Years .......................................................................... 9-1
9.1.2 Implementation to Achieve Water Use Targets ................................................................ 9-1
9.2 Existing Demand Management Measures for Retail Suppliers.................................................. 9-2
9.2.1 Water-Waste Prevention Ordinances ................................................................................ 9-2
9.2.2 Metering............................................................................................................................. 9-3
9.2.3 Conservation Pricing .......................................................................................................... 9-4
9.2.4 Public Education and Outreach .......................................................................................... 9-4
9.2.5 Programs to Assess and Manage Distribution System Real Loss ....................................... 9-4
9.2.6 Water Conservation Program Coordination and Staffing Support .................................... 9-4
9.2.7 Other Demand Management Measures ............................................................................ 9-4 10 UWMP Adoption, Submittal, and Implementation ......................................................................... 10-1
10.1 Inclusion of All 2025 Data ........................................................................................................ 10-1
10.2 Notice of Plan Preparation ....................................................................................................... 10-1
10.3 Notice of Public Hearing .......................................................................................................... 10-1
10.4 Public Hearing and Adoption ................................................................................................... 10-3
10.4.1 Public Hearing .................................................................................................................. 10-3
10.4.2 Adoption .......................................................................................................................... 10-3
10.5 Plan Submittal .......................................................................................................................... 10-4 594
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
iv
10.5.1 Submitting a UWMP and Water Shortage Contingency Plan to DWR ............................. 10-4
10.5.2 Electronic Data Submittal ................................................................................................ 10-4
10.5.3 Submitting a UWMP, including WSCP, to the California State Library ............................ 10-4
10.5.4 Submitting a UWMP to Cities and Counties .................................................................... 10-4
10.6 Public Availability ..................................................................................................................... 10-4
10.7 Notification to Public Utilities Commission ............................................................................. 10-5
10.8 Plan Implementation ............................................................................................................... 10-5
10.9 Amending an Adopted UWMP or Water Shortage Contingency Plan ..................................... 10-5
10.9.1 Amending a UWMP .......................................................................................................... 10-5
10.9.2 Amending a Water Shortage Contingency Plan ............................................................... 10-5 11 References ....................................................................................................................................... 11-1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 – Public Water Systems (DWR Table 2-1 Retail) ........................................................................ 2-2 Table 2-2 – Plan Identification (DWR Table 2-2) ........................................................................................ 2-2 Table 2-3 – Supplier Identification (DWR Table 2-3) ................................................................................. 2-3 Table 2-4 – Water Supplier Information Exchange (DWR Table 2-4 Retail) .............................................. 2-4 Table 2-5 – UWMP Coordination ............................................................................................................... 2-4 Table 3-1 – City of Oakdale Climate Data .................................................................................................. 3-5 Table 3-2 – Population - Current and Projected (DWR Table 3-1 Retail) ................................................... 3-6 Table 3-3 – Demographic Factors .............................................................................................................. 3-7 Table 4-1 – Past Water Use (2020-2024) ................................................................................................... 4-3 Table 4-2 – Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water – Actual (DWR Table 4-1 Retail) .................. 4-4 Table 4-3 – Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water – Projected (DWR Table 4-2 Retail) ............. 4-6 Table 4-4 – Inclusion in Water Use Projections (DWR Table 4-3 Retail) .................................................... 4-8 Table 4-5 – City of Oakdale Low Income Projected Water Demand ......................................................... 4-8 Table 4-6 – Water Loss Audit Reporting (DWR Table 4-5 Retail) ............................................................. 4-10 Table 4-7 – Progress Towards 2028 Water Loss Standard (DWR Table 4-6 Retail) ................................. 4-11 Table 5-1 – SBX7-7 2020 Target Progress (DWR Table 5-1 Retail) ............................................................. 5-2 Table 6-1 – Well Capacity ........................................................................................................................... 6-3 Table 6-2 – Groundwater Volume Pumped (DWR Table 6-1 Retail).......................................................... 6-6 Table 6-3 – Wastewater Collected within Service Area (DWR Table 6-2 Retail) ....................................... 6-9 Table 6-4 – Wastewater Treatment and Discharge within UWMP Service Area (DWR Table 6-3 Retail) ... 6- 10 Table 6-5 – Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area (DWR Table 6-4 Retail) ........... 6-12 Table 6-6 – 2020 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2025 Actual (DWR Table 6-5 Retail) ................................................................................................................................................................. 6-13 Table 6-7 – Methods to Encourage Future Recycled Water Use (DWR Table 6-6 Retail) ....................... 6-14 Table 6-8 – Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Programs (DWR Table 6-7 Retail) ..................... 6-16 Table 6-9 – Water Supplies – Actual (DWR Table 6-8 Retail) ................................................................... 6-17 Table 6-10 – Water Supplies – Projected (DWR Table 6-9 Retail) ........................................................... 6-18 Table 7-1 – Basis of Water Year Data (DWR Table 7-1 Retail) ................................................................... 7-3 Table 7-2 – Normal Year Supply and Use Comparison (DWR Table 7-2 Retail) ......................................... 7-4 Table 7-3 – Single Dry Year Supply and Use Comparison (DWR Table 7-3 Retail) ..................................... 7-5 595
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
v
Table 7-4 – Multiple Dry Years Supply and Use Comparison (DWR Table 7-4 Retail) ............................... 7-6 Table 7-5 – Five-Year Drought Risk Assessment (DWR Table 7-5 Retail)................................................... 7-8 Table 10-1 – Notification to Cities and Counties (DWR Table 10-1 Retail) .............................................. 10-2
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3-1 – Service Area Boundary Map .................................................................................................. 3-3 Figure 3-2 – City of Oakdale Water System Map ....................................................................................... 3-4 Figure 3-3 – Land Use Diagram .................................................................................................................. 3-8 Figure 6-1 – Modesto Groundwater Subbasin Location and Boundaries .................................................. 6-5
APPENDICES
Appendix A – DWR UWMP Tables
Appendix B – DWR UWMP Checklist
Appendix C – Agency and Public Notices
Appendix D – Water Loss Audits (2020-2024)
Appendix E – SB X7-7 Compliance Form
Appendix F – Energy Use Tables
Appendix G – Consumer Confidence Reports (2021-2024)
Appendix H – Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Appendix I – City of Oakdale Municipal Code
Appendix J – Water Rates
Appendix K – UWMP Adoption Resolution
596
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
vi
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AB Assembly Bill
AF Acre-feet
AFY Acre-feet per year
AWWA American Water Works Association
CAP Climate Action Plan
CCF Centum Cubic Feet
CIMIS California Irrigation Management Information System City City of Oakdale
CWC California Water Code
DMM Demand Management Measures
DOF California Department of Finance
DPR Direct Potable Reuse
DRA Drought Risk Assessment
DWR California Department of Water Resources
ET Evapotranspiration
GHG greenhouse gases
gpm gallons per minute
gpcd, GPCD gallons per capita per day
gpscd gallons per service connection per day
GSA Groundwater Sustainability Agency
GSP Groundwater Sustainability Plan
Legislature State of California Legislature
MG Million gallons
OID Oakdale Irrigation District
PWS Public Water System
RUWMP Regional Urban Water Management Plan
SB Senate Bill
SGMA Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
StanCOG Stanislaus County of Governments
STRGBA Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
UWMPA Urban Water Management Plan Act
UWMP Guidebook 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Guidebook for Urban Water Suppliers Water Master Plan 2022 Oakdale Water Master Plan
WSCP Water Shortage Contingency Plan
WSRA Water Service Reliability Assessment
WWTF Wastewater Treatment Facility
WWTP Wastewater Treatment Plant
597
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
1-1
1 UWMP Introduction and Lay Description
1.1 Background and Purpose
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10615:
“Plan” means an urban water management plan prepared pursuant to this part. A plan shall describe and evaluate sources of supply, reasonable and practical efficient uses, reclamation and demand management activities. The components of the plan may vary according to an individual community or area's characteristics and its capabilities to efficiently use and conserve water. The plan shall address measures for residential, commercial, governmental, and industrial water demand management as set forth in Article 2 (commencing with Section 10630) of Chapter 3. In addition, a strategy and time schedule for implementation shall be included in the plan.
The California Water Code (CWC) requires urban water suppliers within the state to prepare and adopt Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) for submission to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). The UWMPs, which must be filed every five years, must satisfy the requirements of the Urban Water Management Planning Act (UWMPA) of 1983 including amendments that have been made to the UWMPA and other applicable regulations. The UWMPA requires urban water suppliers servicing 3,000 or more connections or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet (AF) of water annually, to prepare an UWMP.
The purpose of the UWMP is to maintain efficient use of urban water supplies, continue to promote conservation programs and policies, ensure that sufficient water supplies are available for future beneficial use, and provide a mechanism for response during water drought conditions. This Plan, which was prepared in compliance with the CWC, and as set forth in the 2025 Urban Water Management Plan Guidebook for Urban Water Suppliers (January 2026) established by DWR (2025 UWMP Guidebook), constitutes the City of Oakdale (City) 2025 UWMP. This 2025 UWMP was prepared in compliance with the UWMPA and the Water Conservation Bill of 2009 (Senate Bill [SB] X7-7) by Black Water Consulting Engineers, Inc. and the City.
1.2 Previous Urban Water Management Plan
The City previously updated its 2020 UWMP in January 2022. Following adoption, the 2020 UWMP was submitted to and approved by DWR. This 2025 UWMP serves as an update to the 2020 UWMP and complies with all new UWMP requirements and regulations.
1.3 Urban Water Management Planning and the California Water Code This section summarizes the CWC sections that are applicable to UWMPs. 598
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
1-2
1.3.1 Urban Water Management Planning Act of 1983
In 1983, State Assembly Bill (AB) 797 modified the CWC Division 6, by creating the UWMPA. Several amendments to the original UWMPA, which were introduced since 1983, have increased the data requirements and planning elements to be included in UWMPs. Initial amendments to the UWMPA required that total projected water use be compared to water supply sources over the next 20 years, in 5-year increments. Recent DWR guidelines also suggest projecting through a 25-year planning horizon to maintain a 20-year timeframe until the next UWMP update has been completed. This is merely a guideline and not a requirement of the UWMPA. Therefore, the use of a 25-year planning horizon as opposed to a 20-year planning horizon is left up to the discretion of the agency. The City has opted to use a 20-year planning horizon in this 2025 UWMP.
1.3.2 Applicable Changes since the 2020 UWMP
Since the UWMPA was enacted, the CWC has continued to evolve in response to statewide water management challenges such as prolonged drought, groundwater overdraft, regulatory updates, and changing climatic conditions. These factors influence each supplier’s water reliability determinations as well as the broader statewide reliability framework overseen by DWR, the State Water Resources Control Board, and the State of California Legislature (Legislature).
Summarized below are the major additions and changes to the UWMP requirements since the 2020 UWMP as per the DWR’s UWMP guidance documents:
• Changes in Water Code – There have been minor changes to the Water Code since the 2020 UWMPs were submitted; primarily, several definitions have been added. None of these change UWMP requirements for 2025 UWMPs.
• Suppliers with Multiple Public Water Systems (PWSs) – For consistency among State agencies, DWR and the State Water Board are using the same criteria to determine when a supplier with multiple PWSs is considered an Urban Water Supplier subject to UWMP requirements. Refer to Chapter 2, Section 2.1.1 of the 2025 UWMP Guidebook for details. • DWR Submittal Tables – Submittal tables have been updated to reflect the current reporting year, improve accuracy of reporting, and more clearly identify information required by Water Code and optional information.
• Water Loss Standard Reporting – There has been no change to the Water Code regarding water loss standard reporting since 2020 UWMPs were submitted. However, the existing Water Code requires suppliers to demonstrate compliance with the 2028 Water Loss Standard. The Water Loss Standards were not available when the 2020 UWMPs were being submitted but are now available for 2025 UWMPs. Therefore, guidance has been added about how suppliers can now report progress toward compliance with their Water Loss Standard in 2025 UWMPs. Refer to Submittal Table 4-6 and related guidance in Chapter 4 of the 2025 UWMP Guidebook. • Direct Potable Reuse – The State Water Board has adopted regulations for the use of direct potable reuse (DPR) since 2020 UWMP reporting. To allow for reporting of DPR, minor changes have been made to supply and demand tables. Refer to guidance in Chapters 4 and 6 of the 2025 UWMP Guidebook.
599
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
1-3
• Lower-Income Housing – While projections for lower-income housing were required in 2020 UWMPs, additional guidance has been provided for optional reporting of the method used to project water use for lower-income housing. This optional guidance incorporates the Regional Housing Needs Assessment into projected land uses and water demands. Refer to Chapter 4 and Appendix K of the 2025 UWMP Guidebook for more information. • Reporting Groundwater Recharge and Other Water Storage – In previous years, the guidance for reporting water placed into storage did not differentiate between long-term storage (i.e., water placed into storage one year but extracted in a future year) and short-term storage (i.e., water that is placed into storage and extracted the same year). When a supplier reports water placed into storage and then reports it was retrieved in the same year (short-term storage) it can cause a double counting error. Additional guidance recommending that suppliers do not report water into and out of short-term storage is provided in Chapter 4 and Chapter 6 of the 2025 UWMP Guidebook.
1.4 UWMPs in Relation to Other Planning Efforts
The City is committed to providing a reliable and high-quality water supply to its customers. To ensure that the City will be able to continue to reliably serve the residents of Oakdale in the future, the City has conducted/participated in several important planning efforts that relate to water supply planning and are related to the UWMP. Some of the most recent water planning efforts are summarized below:
• Oakdale 2030 General Plan [1]: On August 8, 2013, the City adopted an update to its General Plan that guides land use and development for the Oakdale Planning through the year 2030. The General Plan focuses on the preservation and enhancement of the existing community while guiding urban growth.
• 2022 Oakdale Water Master Plan (Water Master Plan) [2]: The City updated its Water Master Plan in 2022, which was previously developed in 2015. The Water Master Plan sets the foundation for the City to expand its water system to meet the needs of its growing population through the planning horizon of the General Plan along with updating projected growth. • Revised Modesto Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan [3]: The Stanislaus and Tuolumne Rivers Groundwater Basin Association (STRGBA) Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA) and the Tuolumne GSA developed a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP) for the Modesto Subbasin and was adopted in June 2024 and revised in July 2024. The GSP outlines how groundwater in the subbasin will be managed and regulated to ensure long-term sustainable use, prevent overdraft, and protect water quality in compliance with California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA).
1.5 UWMP Organization
This 2025 UWMP contains the appropriate sections and tables required per the UWMPA and has been prepared based on guidance provided by the 2025 UWMP Guidebook. The required tables are included in the relevant sections and in Appendix A.
DWR’s UWMP Checklist, as provided in the 2025 UWMP Guidebook, has been completed to demonstrate the UWMP’s compliance with applicable requirements. A copy of the completed checklist is included in Appendix B. This Plan is organized according to the recommended format provided in the 2025 UWMP Guidebook. The UWMP contains ten chapters as outlined below, followed by appendices that provide supporting documentation for the information presented in the plan. 600
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
1-4
• Chapter 1 – UWMP Introduction and Lay Description: This chapter provides background information for the 2025 UWMP and provides a description of the purpose of the plan. • Chapter 2 – UWMP Preparation: This chapter includes information on the development of the 2025 UWMP and efforts in coordination and outreach.
• Chapter 3 – Service Area Description: This chapter describes the service area, population, and climate; presents an overview of the City’s water distribution system; and describes the City's organizational structure and history.
• Chapter 4 – Water Use Characterization: This chapter describes and quantifies the current and projected water uses within the City’s service area.
• Chapter 5 – SB X7-7 Baselines, 2020 Targets, and 2025 Reporting: This chapter includes the reported 2020 per-capita water conservation target as calculated in the 2015 UWMP and reports progress toward meeting the target in accordance with Water Code requirements. • Chapter 6 – Water Supply Characterization: This chapter describes the current and projected sources of water available to the City. A description of potential recycled water use and supply availability is also included in this chapter.
• Chapter 7 – Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment: This chapter describes the reliability of the City’s current supply and evaluates the reliability 20 years out, including normal, single-dry years, and five consecutive dry years.
• Chapter 8 – Water Shortage Contingency Plan: This chapter references the City’s Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) which is provided in Appendix H. • Chapter 9 – Demand Management Measures: This chapter describes the City's efforts to promote conservation, reduce water demand, and describes the City's demand management measures. • Chapter 10 – UWMP Adoption, Submittal, and Implementation: This chapter describes the steps taken to adopt and submit the 2025 UWMP and make it publicly available. This chapter also describes the City's plan to implement the UWMP.
1.6 Lay Description
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10630.5:
Each plan shall include a simple lay description of how much water the agency has on a reliable basis, how much it needs for the foreseeable future, what the agency’s strategy is for meeting its water needs, the challenges facing the agency, and any other information necessary to provide a general understanding of the agency’s plan.
The City’s 2025 UWMP explains where the City’s water comes from, how much water is used today, how much will be needed in the future, and how the City plans to continue providing reliable water service under normal conditions, dry years, and droughts.
601
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
1-5
According to the Stanislaus County Demographic and Employment Forecast 2025, prepared by the University of the Pacific Center for Business and Policy Research for the Stanislaus County of Governments (StanCOG), the City currently serves approximately 23,132 people through its municipal water system [4].
In 2025, the City delivered approximately 4,779 AF of potable water to residential, commercial, industrial, and public customers per the City’s metered system and provided approximately 47 AF of non-potable water to City parks. Water use is expected to gradually increase as the City grows, with total demand projected to reach approximately 5,032 AF by 2045.
The City operates seven active groundwater wells with a combined firm well capacity of about 9,179 gallons per minute (gpm) or 4,900 acre-feet per year (AFY). These wells supply the City’s entire potable water demand. In addition, the City has an agreement with the Oakdale Irrigation District (OID) that allows for the use of surface water, primarily for irrigation purposes, and may provide additional supply flexibility in the future.
The UWMP shows that the City has sufficient water supply to meet projected demands over the next 20 years under normal conditions, as well as during single dry years and extended drought conditions. Even during a five-year drought scenario, available supplies are expected to exceed projected demands. The City also maintains a WSCP that outlines how water use would be reduced and managed if shortages occur.
One of the City’s primary challenges is its reliance on groundwater as its sole water source. The City pumps from the Modesto Subbasin, which is classified as a high-priority basin under the SGMA. Long-term reliability of this supply depends on responsible groundwater management, regional coordination through the GSA, and implementation of sustainability plans to avoid overdraft and protect water quality.
To address future needs and improve system reliability, the City is planning to expand its water system.
This includes constructing additional groundwater wells and evaluating opportunities to increase the use of surface water supplies through OID. The City is also exploring long-term options such as recycled water use and groundwater recharge opportunities.
Water conservation remains an important part of the City’s strategy. The City has implemented several programs to reduce water use, including water waste prevention ordinances, full metering of customers, conservation-based pricing, public education, and ongoing efforts to reduce water loss in the distribution system. These measures help ensure efficient use of water and support long-term supply reliability.
In summary, the City’s 2025 UWMP demonstrates that the City currently has adequate water supplies and is planning to meet future demands. By managing its groundwater resources, expanding infrastructure, promoting conservation, and preparing for drought conditions, the City is working to provide safe and reliable water service to its customers now and into the future. 602
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
2-1
2 UWMP Preparation
This chapter provides information on the processes used for developing the 2025 UWMP, including coordination and outreach efforts.
2.1 Basis for Preparing a Plan
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10617:
“Urban water supplier” means a supplier, either publicly or privately owned, providing water for municipal purposes either directly or indirectly to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually. An urban water supplier includes a supplier or contractor for water, regardless of the basis of right, which distributes or sells for ultimate resale to customers. This part applies only to water supplied from public water systems.
Water Code Section 10608.12
(t) “Urban retail water supplier” means a water supplier, either publicly or privately owned, that directly provides potable municipal water to more than 3,000 end users or that supplies more than 3,000 acrefeet of potable water annually at retail for municipal purposes. (w) “Urban wholesale water supplier” means a water supplier, either publicly or privately owned, that provides more than 3,000 acre-feet of water annually at wholesale for potable municipal purposes.
CWC Section 10620:
(b) Every person that becomes an urban water supplier shall adopt an urban water management plan within one year after it has become an urban water supplier.
CWC Section 10621:
(a) Each urban water supplier shall update its plan at least once every five years on or before July 1, in years ending in six and one, incorporating updated and new information from the five years preceding each update.
2.1.1 Public Water Systems
The CWC defines an urban water supplier as “a water supplier, either publicly or privately owned, that directly provides potable municipal water to more than 3,000 end users or supplies more than 3,000 AF of potable water annually at retail for municipal purposes.” Table 2-1 (DWR Table 2-1 Retail) documents the number of municipal connections and the volume of water supplied in 2025. The City is considered an urban retail water supplier.
603
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
2-2
Table 2-1 – Public Water Systems (DWR Table 2-1 Retail) Submittal Table 2-1 Retail: Public Water Systems
Public Water System
Number
Public Water System
Name
Number of Municipal
Connections 2025
Volume of Water
Supplied 2025
Add additional rows as needed
CA5010014 City of Oakdale 8,335 4,826
Total 8,335 4,826
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Table 2-3.
NOTES: Unit of measure for volumes are in AF.
2.2 Individual Planning and Compliance
Water agencies are given the option to develop UWMPs individually or collectively as a regional group.
While efforts to prepare the UWMP were coordinated with appropriate agencies, this 2025 UWMP was developed for the City service area only, and the City is not participating in a Regional UWMP as specified in Table 2-2 (DWR Table 2-2).
Table 2-2 – Plan Identification (DWR Table 2-2)
Submittal Table 2-2: Plan Identification
Select
One or
Both
Type of Plan Name of Regional Alliance or
RUWMP (Drop Down List)
Individual UWMP
If Water Supplier is also a member of a SB X7-7
Regional Alliance, select name from the drop-down.
Regional Urban Water Management Plan (RUWMP)
If Supplier selected RUWMP, select name from the
drop-down.
NOTES: No additional notes.
2.3 Fiscal or Calendar Year and Units of Measure
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10608.20:
(a)(1) Urban retail water suppliers…may determine the targets on a fiscal year or calendar year basis.
The City’s 2025 UWMP has been prepared on a calendar year basis and includes planning data for the entire year of 2025. The City’s reporting of water volumes in this 2025 UWMP is reported in AFY. Table 2- 3 (DWR Table 2-3) summarizes the City’s reporting methods for this 2025 UWMP. 604
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
2-3
Table 2-3 – Supplier Identification (DWR Table 2-3)
Submittal Table 2-3: Supplier Identification
Type of Supplier (select one or both)
Supplier is a wholesale supplier
Supplier is a retail supplier
Fiscal or Calendar Year (select one)
UWMP Tables are in calendar years
UWMP Tables are in fiscal years
If using fiscal years provide month and date that the fiscal year begins (mm/dd)
Units of measure used in UWMP
(Select from the drop down list).
Unit AF
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent
throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: No additional notes.
2.4 Coordination and Outreach
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631:
(h) An urban water supplier that relies upon a wholesale agency for a source of water shall provide the wholesale agency with water use projections from that agency for that source of water in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available. The wholesale agency shall provide information to the urban water supplier for inclusion in the urban water supplier’s plan that identifies and quantifies, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water as required by subdivision (b), available from the wholesale agency to the urban water supplier over the same five-year increments, and during various water-year types in accordance with subdivision. (f). An urban water supplier may rely upon water supply information provided by the wholesale agency in fulfilling the plan informational requirements of subdivisions (b) and (f).
The UWMPA requires that the UWMP identify the water agency’s coordination with appropriate nearby agencies. While preparing the 2025 UWMP, the City coordinated its efforts with relevant agencies to ensure that the data and issues are presented accurately. 605
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
2-4
2.4.1 Wholesale and Retail Coordination
The City does not receive wholesale water, nor does it plan to in the future (Table 2-4 (DWR Table 2-4 Retail)).
Table 2-4 – Water Supplier Information Exchange (DWR Table 2-4 Retail) Submittal Table 2-4 Retail: Water Supplier Information Exchange Water Code Section 10631(h)
The retail Supplier has informed the following wholesale supplier(s) of projected water use.
Wholesale Water Supplier Name
Add additional rows as needed
N/A
NOTES: No additional notes.
2.4.2 Coordination with Other Agencies and the Community Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10620:
(d)(3) Each urban water supplier shall coordinate the preparation of its plan with other appropriate agencies in the area, including other water suppliers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant public agencies, to the extent practicable.
CWC Section 10642:
Each urban water supplier shall encourage the active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the service area prior to and during the preparation of the plan...
The City coordinated the preparation of its UWMP and WSCP with both local and regional agencies, including a public agency that relies on related or interconnected water supplies. Table 2-5 provides a list of agencies consulted during the development of this Plan.
Table 2-5 – UWMP Coordination
Agencies
Stanislaus County
Oakdale Irrigation District
The City also maintains an ongoing commitment to public involvement in water resource planning. Public participation is encouraged through a variety of methods, including direct mailings, public meetings, and web-based communications. The City website provides updates on ongoing water system projects, public notices, and proposed rate adjustments related to water system improvements.
A public hearing will be held for review and comment on the UWMP before City Council approval.
Additionally, copies of the UWMP will be posted on the City’s website homepage. 606
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
2-5
2.4.3 Notice to Cities and Counties
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10621(b):
Every urban water supplier required to prepare a plan pursuant to this part shall, at least 60 days before the public hearing on the plan required by Section 10642, notify any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies that the urban water supplier will be reviewing the plan and considering amendments or changes to the plan.
In accordance with CWC Section 10621, a notice of preparation was sent to Stanislaus County 60 days prior to the public hearing date. Noticing for the public hearing was conducted pursuant to Section 6066 of the Government Code prior to commencement of the public comment period. This notification is reported in Table 10-1. Copies of the public hearing notices and notices to the city and county entities served by the City, as well as other agencies, are included in Appendix C. The notices included the UWMP update schedule and contact information.
607
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
3-1
3 Service Area Description
The UWMPA requires that the UWMP include a description of the water purveyor’s service area and various aspects of the area served, including climate, population, and other demographic factors.
3.1 General Description
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631:
(a) Describe the service area of the supplier, including current and projected population, climate, and other social, economic, and demographic factors affecting the supplier’s water management planning.
The projected population estimates shall be based upon data from the state, regional, or local service agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier and shall be in fiveyear increments to 20 years or as far as data is available. The description shall include the current and projected land uses within the existing or anticipated service area affecting the supplier’s water management planning. Urban water suppliers shall coordinate with local or regional land use authorities to determine the most appropriate land use information, including, where appropriate, land use information obtained from local or regional land use authorities, as developed pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code.
The City was incorporated in 1906, and is located in the Central Valley on the northeast side of Stanislaus County at the intersections of State Routes 120 and 108. The City is situated approximately 15 miles northeast of Modesto, 20 miles north of Turlock, 22 miles east of Manteca, and 30 miles southeast of Stockton. Oakdale is situated along the Stanislaus River and is surrounded primarily by agricultural lands.
The City is a full-service City providing police and fire protection, emergency services, parks and recreation, street maintenance, water distribution, wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal, and general governmental services. The City’s water service area is generally contiguous with the City limits.
Limited areas adjacent to the City boundaries may be served by other water purveyors or private wells.
The distribution system includes an extensive network of water mains, storage facilities, and booster pump stations designed to meet domestic, commercial, industrial, and fire protection demands. The City maintains a water storage reservoir that provides operational and emergency supply capacity. Long-term planning for the water system, including system improvements and capacity expansion, is addressed in the City’s adopted water planning and master planning documents.
The Oakdale water system serves its population of approximately 23,132 people through seven active wells. The distribution system consists of approximately 75 miles of water lines ranging in diameter from 2 to 16 inches. The City has one 1.0 million gallon (MG) water storage tank, known as the Valley View Tank, that was constructed in 2014. The water system has two booster pump stations, known as the Burchell Hill Booster Pump Station and the Well No. 5A Site Booster Pump Station. The Burchell Hill Booster Pump Station has four booster pumps rated each at 450 gpm, and the Well No. 5A Site Booster Pump Station has two booster pumps rated each at 500 gpm. More information about the water system can be found in the Water Master Plan [2].
608
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
3-2
3.2 Service Area Boundary Maps
The City’s water service area encompasses approximately 3,994 acres, or 6.24 square miles. While the City's existing service area is generally contiguous with the City limit, certain newly developing areas may be incorporated into the service area as buildout progresses in accordance with land use plans and infrastructure phasing. Figure 3-1 presents a location map of the City’s service area. Figure 3-2 depicts the existing water distribution system.
609
610
611
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
3-5
3.3 Service Area Climate
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(a):
A plan shall… Describe the service area of the supplier, including … “climate”… CWC Section 10630:
It is the intention of the Legislature, in enacting this part, to permit levels of water management planning… while accounting for impacts of climate change.
Water use within the City’s service area depends on various climate factors, including temperature, precipitation, and evapotranspiration (ET). ET is a term which refers to the amount of water transferred from the Earth’s surface to the atmosphere through evaporation from the soil and surface water bodies and plant transpiration. Climate data, including temperature and precipitation estimates, were obtained from the California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) Station #194, located in Oakdale.
The 2025 climatic data for the City is summarized in Table 3-1.
Table 3-1 – City of Oakdale Climate Data
Month
Monthly Average
Temperature (F)
Total Monthly
Precipitation
(inches)
Total Monthly ET
Maximum Minimum (inches)
January 59.60 31.50 0.59 1.79
February 63.10 39.50 1.73 2.00
March 65.20 41.10 2.66 3.27
April 72.80 44.20 0.79 4.85
May 80.70 49.70 0.00 7.21
June 87.00 54.00 0.00 7.91
July 89.00 56.50 0.00 7.87
August 92.10 59.50 0.00 7.27
September 87.40 59.10 0.15 5.15
October 75.50 48.80 1.47 3.08
November 64.70 46.40 3.48 1.42
December 52.40 42.40 1.94 0.56
Annual Average 74.10 47.70 1.07 4.37
Total - - 12.81 52.38
Source: CIMIS Website: www.cimis.water.ca.gov, Station 194 Oakdale, California, Monthly Report, January 2025 – December 2025, Printed in March 2026 [5]
These climate characteristics influence the City’s water use. As described in Chapter 4, the City’s water use in the summer months is significantly higher than that in the winter, reflecting increased water use for irrigation purposes during the hot, dry summers.
612
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
3-6
3.4 Service Area Population and Demographics
3.4.1 Service Area Population
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(a):
Describe the service area of the supplier, including current and projected population …The projected population estimates shall be based upon data from the state, regional, or local service agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier and shall be in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available.
The City’s current (2025) service area population is 23,132 [4]. The City’s population has grown at an average annual rate of 3.3 percent from 2015 through 2025 according to the City’s documented population values. The DOF estimates that households in the City have an average of 2.8 persons per household with approximately 8,272 total households in 2025.
Population projections for the City’s service area, presented in Table 3-2 (DWR Table 3-1 Retail), are based on the Stanislaus County Demographic and Employment Forecast 2025 prepared by the University of the Pacific Center for Business and Policy Research for the StanCOG [4]. The StanCOG forecast incorporates current regional demographic trends, recent development patterns, and updated economic assumptions for Stanislaus County and its communities.
Table 3-2 – Population - Current and Projected (DWR Table 3-1 Retail) Submittal Table 3-1 Retail: Population - Current and Projected Water Code Section 10631(a)
Population
Served
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050(opt)
23,132 23,271 23,607 23,977 24,429
NOTES: Population projections are based on the Stanislaus County Demographic and Employment Forecast 2025 prepared by the University of the Pacific Center for Business and Policy Research for the StanCOG [4].
The City’s General Plan projected a population of approximately 35,000 by 2030. The population projections used in this UWMP are based on the more recent StanCOG demographic forecast and are considered to more accurately reflect current population trends within the City.
3.4.2 Other Social, Economic, and Demographic Factors
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631:
(a) Describe the service area of the supplier, including… other social, economic and demographic factors affecting the supplier’s water management planning.
613
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
3-7
According to data available through the US Census Bureau American Community Survey [6], the median household income in the City is $83,091. The percent of the population below the poverty level is 14.8%.
The median age in the City is 35 years old. 85.5% of the population have attained a high school diploma and 22.2% have a bachelor’s degree or higher. Table 3-3 provides additional information pertaining to Oakdale’s demographic factors.
Table 3-3 – Demographic Factors
Parameter Value
Age and Sex
Persons under 5 years, percent 5.8%
Persons under 18 years, percent 27.0%
Persons 65 years and over, percent 12.9%
Female persons, percent 52.2%
Race and Hispanic Origin
White alone, percent 61.2%
Black or African American alone, percent 1.0%
American Indian and Alaska Native alone, percent 0.7%
Asian alone, percent 2.2%
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, percent 0.0% Some other Race 12.6%
Two or More Races, percent 22.3%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau for City of Oakdale, California (American Community Survey for 2024)
3.5 Land Uses within Service Area
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(a):
The description shall include the current and projected land uses within the existing or anticipated service area affecting the supplier’s water management planning. Urban water suppliers shall coordinate with local or regional land use authorities to determine the most appropriate land use information, including, where appropriate, land use information obtained from local or regional land use authorities…
The City is predominantly comprised of single-family residential, multi-family residential, commercial, institutional/governmental, industrial, and landscape irrigation land uses. Figure 3-3 shows a map of existing and buildout general land use distribution within the City. The Oakdale 2030 General Plan provides detailed land use designations and future development patterns [1].
614
615
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-1
4 Water Use Characterization
This chapter describes and quantifies the current and projected water demands within the City’s service area.
4.1 Non-Potable versus Potable Water Use
Potable water is defined as water that is safe for human consumption and has been treated and disinfected in accordance with applicable federal and State drinking water standards. The City satisfies its potable water demands using groundwater supplies.
In addition to potable water, the City utilizes raw water as a form of non-potable supply. Raw water consists of untreated surface water used in its natural state or with minimal treatment for non-potable applications. The City maintains an agreement with OID to receive surface water for use in landscape irrigation at designated public parks.
4.2 Past, Current, and Projected Water Use by Sector
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10635:
(a) Every urban water Supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, an assessment of the reliability of its water service to its customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry water years.
This water supply and demand assessment shall compare the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the long-term total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years. The water service reliability assessment shall be based upon the information compiled pursuant to Section 10631, including available data from state, regional, or local agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier.
CWC Section 10631(d):
(1) For an urban retail water supplier, quantify, to the extent records are available, past and current water use, over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a), and projected water use, based upon information developed pursuant to subdivision (a), identifying the uses among water use sectors, including, but not necessarily limited to, all of the following… (2) The water use projections shall be in the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a). (4)(A) Water use projections, where available, shall display and account for the water savings estimated to result from adopted codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans identified by the urban water supplier, as applicable to the service area. (B) To the extent that an urban water supplier reports the information described in subparagraph (A), an urban water supplier shall do both of the following: (i) Provide citations of the various codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans utilized in making the projections. (ii) Indicate the extent that the water use projections consider savings from codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans. Water use projections that do not account for these water savings shall be noted of that fact.
616
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-2
The following sections describe past, current, and projected water use within the City for each of the 10 water use sectors identified in CWC Section 10631(d).
4.2.1 Water Use Sectors Listed in Water Code
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(d):
(1) For an urban retail water supplier, quantify, to the extent records are available, past and current water use, over the same five-year increments described in subdivision (a), and projected water use, based upon information developed pursuant to subdivision (a), identifying the uses among water use sectors, including, but not necessarily limited to, all of the following:
(A) Single-family residential.
(B) Multifamily.
(C) Commercial.
(D) Industrial.
(E) Institutional and governmental.
(F) Landscape.
(G) Sales to other agencies.
(H) Saline water intrusion barriers, groundwater recharge, or conjunctive use, or any combination thereof.
(I) Agricultural.
(J) Distribution system water loss.
The water use sectors that are served by the City’s water system include single-family residential, multifamily residential, commercial, industrial, institutional/governmental, landscape irrigation, other, and distribution system water losses. These classifications are defined by the 2025 UWMP Guidebook as follows:
• Single-family residential – A single-family dwelling unit. A lot with a free-standing building containing one dwelling unit that may include a detached secondary dwelling. • Multi-family residential – Multiple dwelling units contained within one building or several buildings within one complex.
• Commercial – A water user that provides or distributes a product or service. • Industrial – A water user that is primarily a manufacturer or processor of materials as defined by the North American Industry Classification System code sectors 31 to 33, inclusive, or an entity that is a water user primarily engaged in research and development. • Institutional/Governmental – A water user dedicated to public service. This type of user includes, among other users, higher-education institutions, schools, courts, churches, hospitals, government facilities, and nonprofit research institutions. • Landscape – Water connections supplying water solely for landscape irrigation. Such landscapes may be associated with single-family residential, multi-family residential, commercial, industrial, or institutional/governmental sites, but are considered a separate water-use sector if the connection is solely for landscape irrigation.
• Other – Any water use that is not adequately described by the water sectors defined above or water uses that are not separately classified.
• Distribution System Water Losses – Water losses which occur due to distribution system leaks and other unmetered water uses (such as firefighting, main flushing, etc.). 617
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-3
Additional sectors that are not applicable to the City’s water system include: sales to other agencies, groundwater recharge, saline water intrusion barriers or conjunctive use, and agricultural.
4.2.2 Water Use Sectors in Addition to Those Listed in Water Code The water system does not serve additional water use sectors.
4.2.3 Past Water Use
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(d):
(1) For an urban retail water supplier, quantify, to the extent records are available, past… water use… based upon information developed pursuant to subdivision (a), identifying the uses among water use sectors…
The City’s past water use for 2020-2024 is shown in Table 4-1. 2020-2024 water use is based on consumption and production data provided by the City. Water losses are estimated as the difference between total consumption and total production. Variations in water use during this period reflect a combination of climate variability, conservation measures, and changes in customer behavior.
Table 4-1 – Past Water Use (2020-2024)
Water Use Category
Actual Demand, AFY
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Single Family 3,017 2,928 2,884 2,713 2,868
Multi-Family 286 288 294 267 259
Commercial 329 374 365 340 333
Industrial 0 0 0 0 1
Institutional/Governmental 333 138 145 132 133
Landscape 848 1,086 1,073 943 1,086
Landscape (Non-Potable) 0 0 0 0 20
Other 12 12 12 11 12
Losses 391 376 406 414 353
Total Water Demand 5,216 5,203 5,179 4,820 5,064
Note: The "Other" water use category accounts for unbilled unmetered water consumption and is estimated as 0.25% of the total billed consumption, in accordance with the AWWA water loss audit form.
4.2.4 Current Water Use
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(d):
(1) For an urban retail water supplier, quantify, to the extent records are available, … current water use… based upon information developed pursuant to subdivision (a), identifying the uses among water use sectors…
618
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-4
Water demand by land use type is presented in Table 4-2 (DWR Table 4-1 Retail). As shown, all water deliveries in 2025 were treated to drinking water standards other than OID’s non-potable surface water used for landscape irrigation. Total water demand for 2025 was 4,826 AF, which includes system losses.
The City uses water loss audits to identify system inefficiencies and prioritize maintenance and capital improvements to reduce real and apparent losses over time.
Table 4-2 – Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water – Actual (DWR Table 4-1 Retail) Submittal Table 4-1 Retail: Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water — Actual Water Code Section 10631(d)(1)
Use Type
Additional Description
(as needed)
2025 Actual Water Use
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only use types that will be
recognized by the WUEdata online
submittal tool
Potable or NonPotable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Volume
Add additional rows as needed
Single Family
Single family and
apartment residential
demands.
Potable 2,772
Multi-Family Potable 258
Commercial
Builder; Commercial;
Utilities; Construction;
Manufacturing; Mining
Potable 301
Industrial Potable 96
Institutional/Governmental Potable 60
Landscape City landscape irrigation Potable 1,015
Landscape OID surface water for
park landscape irrigation Non-Potable 47
Other Unbilled Unmetered Potable 11
Distribution System Water Loss Potable 265
Subtotal Potable 4,779
Subtotal Non-Potable 47
Total 4,826
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Volume of Water Loss for 2025 was estimated based on water supplied and billed meter data and has not been audited. The "Other" water use category accounts for unbilled unmetered water consumption and is estimated as 0.25% of the total billed consumption, in accordance with the AWWA water loss audit form.
619
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-5
4.2.5 Projected Water Use
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(d):
(1) For an urban retail water supplier, quantify, to the extent records are available, … projected water use, based upon information developed pursuant to subdivision (a), identifying the uses among water use sectors…
CWC Section 10633 (e):
The projected use of recycled water within the supplier’s service area at the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and a description of the actual use of recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected pursuant to this subdivision...
CWC Section 10635 (a)
Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, an assessment of the reliability of its water service to its customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry water years.
This water supply and demand assessment shall compare the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the long-term total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years. The water service reliability assessment shall be based upon the information compiled pursuant to Section 10631, including available data from state, regional, or local agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier.
Water Code Section 10631:
(h) An urban water supplier that relies upon a wholesale agency for a source of water shall provide the wholesale agency with water use projections from that agency for that source of water in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available…
If a Retail Supplier receives water from a Wholesale Supplier, the Retail Supplier must provide their projected use of that supply to the Wholesale Supplier. Suppliers will report which wholesale suppliers were informed of their projected use using Submittal Table 2-4 R.
CWC Section 10631(d)(4):
(A) Water use projections, where available, shall display and account for the water savings estimated to result from adopted codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans identified by the urban water supplier, as applicable to the service area. (B) To the extent that an urban water supplier reports the information described in subparagraph (A), an urban water supplier shall do both of the following:
(i) Provide citations of the various codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans utilized in making the projections.
(ii) Indicate the extent that the water use projections consider savings from codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans. Water use projections that do not account for these water savings shall be noted of that fact.
Table 4-3 (DWR Table 4-2 Retail) summarizes the projected water use by type for 2030 through 2045.
These projections were developed using the following assumptions:
620
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-6
• Population projections presented in Table 3-2 (DWR Table 3-1 Retail); and • Future water use distribution by category remains consistent with 2025 percentages.
Table 4-3 – Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water – Projected (DWR Table 4-2 Retail) Submittal Table 4-2 Retail: Total Uses for Potable, and Non-PotableWater — Projected Water Code Section 10631(d)(1)
Use Type
Additional
Description
(as needed)
Projected Water Use
(Report To the Extent that Records are Available)
Drop down list
May select each use multiple
times
These are the only Use Types
that will be recognized by the
WUEdata online submittal tool
Potable or
NonPotable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down
list
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
opt
Add additional rows as needed.
Single Family
Single family
and apartment
residential
demands.
Potable 2,789 2,829 2,873 2,927 -
Multi-Family Potable 260 264 268 273 -
Commercial
Builder;
Commercial;
Utilities;
Construction;
Manufacturing;
Mining
Potable 303 307 312 318 -
Industrial Potable 97 98 99 101 -
Institutional / Governmental Potable 61 62 63 64 -
Landscape City landscape
irrigation Potable 1,021 1,036 1,052 1,072 -
Landscape
OID surface
water for park
landscape
irrigation
Non-Potable 47 47 47 47 -
Other
Unbilled
Unmetered
Consumption
Potable 11 11 12 12 -
Distribution System Water
Loss Potable 218 218 218 218 -
Subtotal Potable 4,759 4,824 4,896 4,985 0
Subtotal Non-Potable 47 47 47 47 0
Total 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 0
621
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-7
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Similar to projected population increases, the projected water use values are based on the same percentage increase from the Stanislaus County Demographic and Employment Forecast 2025. For non-potable landscape, water use is projected to stay consistent until further parks are added to the OID supply. For projected future water loss, the City is expecting to meet the 2028 Water Loss Standard set by the state and as such the maximum amount of water loss from the city is 218 AF per year by 2028 values.
4.2.6 Water Use for Lower Income Households
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631.1:
(a) The water use projections required by Section 10631 shall include projected water use for singlefamily and multifamily residential housing needed for lower income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the Health and Safety Code, as identified in the housing element of any city, county, or city and county in the service area of the supplier.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature that the identification of projected water use for single-family and multifamily residential housing for lower income households will assist a supplier in complying with the requirement under Section 65589.7 of the Government Code to grant a priority for the provision of service to housing units affordable to lower income households.
California Health and Safety Code Section 50079.5 (a):
“Lower income households” means persons and families whose income does not exceed the qualifying limits for lower income families… In the event the federal standards are discontinued, the department shall, by regulation, establish income limits for lower income households for all geographic areas of the state at 80 percent of area median income, adjusted for family size and revised annually.
The City has included an estimation of water demand for low-income housing in this Plan, as indicated in Table 4-4 (DWR Table 4-3 Retail). This section includes a discussion of projected water use for low-income households in the City’s service area.
622
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-8
Table 4-4 – Inclusion in Water Use Projections (DWR Table 4-3 Retail) Submittal Table 4-3 Retail: Inclusion in Water Use Projections Water Code Section 10631 (a), 10631 (d)(4)(A), and 10631 (d)(4)(B) Are Future Water Savings Included in Projections?
Drop down list (y/n)
Yes
If "Yes" to above, state the section or page number, in the cell to the right, where citations of the codes, ordinances, or otherwise are utilized in demand projections are found.
Optional Suppliers may complete Optional Submittal Table 4-4 R to quantify the expected savings.
4-6
Are Lower Income Residential Demands Included In Projections? Drop down list (y/n) Yes
Optional If the method for accounting Lower Income Residential Demands has been included, provide page number where this accounting can be found. 4-8 DWR NOTES: Additional guidance is provided in Appendix K.
NOTES: No additional notes.
SB 1087 was approved on October 7, 2005 and added certain provisions to the Government Code and amended a portion of the UWMPA. As it relates to the UWMPA, SB 1087 requires the water use projections of an UWMP to include the projected demands for single-family and multi-family residential housing needed for lower income households as identified in the housing element of any city or county in the service area of the supplier (CWC § 10631(a).) A lower income household is any household that has an income below 80 percent of the area median income, adjusted for family size.
Data from the 2024 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Table S2503 indicate that in 2025 approximately 9,734 residents, assuming 2.8 persons per household, live in lower income households in the City [7]. Lower income households are classified as households which earn below 80% of the median income. Projected water demands associated with lower income residential water users through year 2045 are presented in Table 4-5. The projections assume the proportion of lower income residents to total residents remain constant for 2025 and beyond.
Table 4-5 – City of Oakdale Low Income Projected Water Demand Description
Year
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
Total water use, AF 4,826 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032
Total population 23,132 23,271 23,607 23,977 24,429
Lower income population 9,734 9,792 9,934 10,090 10,280 Lower income water demand, AF 2,031 2,022 2,050 2,080 2,117 a) Total water use is from Table 4-2 and 4-3.
b) Total population is from Table 3-2.
c) Lower income population estimated using US Census Bureau, American Community Survey, Table S2503 data for 2024. Ratio of lower income population to total population was assumed to be the same for 2025 through 2045. 623
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-9
4.2.7 Climate Change Considerations
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10630:
It is the intention of the Legislature, in enacting this part, to permit levels of water management planning commensurate with the numbers of customers served and the volume of water supplied, while accounting for impacts from climate change.
CWC Section 10635(b):
Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, a drought risk assessment … (and) shall include each of the following… (4) Considerations of the historical drought hydrology, plausible changes on projected supplies and demands under climate change conditions, anticipated regulatory changes, and other locally applicable criteria.
The Oakdale Climate Action Plan (CAP) serves to outline strategies, goals, and actions for reducing municipal and community-wide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The CAP has been structured to ensure that the City does its part to meet the mandates of California’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32), while taking into account the City’s 2030 General Plan vision for future growth. AB 32 requires jurisdictions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to be at or below 1990 levels by 2020.
The CAP provides a roadmap for the City to be proactive in reducing GHGs through a series of local actions.
Although the CAP is considered a “stand alone” policy document, the strategies presented in the CAP are incorporated into the 2030 General Plan, where appropriate, and are consistent with the goals, policies, and implementation included in the General Plan.
The CAP includes the following components:
• A GHG inventory for 2005 and for future forecasted years 2020 and 2030; • A GHG reduction goal of 29% below business-as-usual emissions for 2020; • Identification and transparent quantification of state-level GHG reduction strategies; • Identification and transparent cost/benefit quantification of feasible reduction strategies and actions;
• Identification of implementation steps and financing mechanisms to achieve the GHG reduction goal;
• Procedures for monitoring and updating the GHG inventory and reduction measures every five years; and
• Identification of an implementation schedule and responsible parties for implementation.
As required by the CWC, a drought risk assessment was prepared as part of the 2025 UWMP and is described in Chapter 7.
624
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-10
4.3 Distribution System Water Losses
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(d)(3):
(A) The distribution system water loss shall be quantified for each of the five years preceding the plan update, in accordance with rules adopted pursuant to Section 10608.34. (B) The distribution system water loss quantification shall be reported in accordance with a worksheet approved or developed by the department through a public process. The water loss quantification worksheet shall be based on the water system balance methodology developed by the American Water Works Association.
(C) In the plan due July 1, 2021, and in each update thereafter, data shall be included to show whether the urban retail water supplier met the distribution loss standards enacted by the board pursuant to Section 10608.34.
The last five years of water loss audit reporting submittals are summarized in Table 4-6 (DWR Table 4-5 Retail). The water loss audits for 2020-2024 are in Appendix D.
Table 4-6 – Water Loss Audit Reporting (DWR Table 4-5 Retail) Submittal Table 4-5 Retail: Water Loss Audit Reporting
Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(A)
Public Water System ID #
Reported in Table 2-1 R
Reporting
Period
Submitted to DWR
Water Loss Audit
Program (yes/no)
Report submittal status for all five years for each Public Water System as available.
Add rows as needed
CA5010014
2020 Yes
2021 Yes
2022 Yes
2023 Yes
2024 Yes
DWR NOTES: Suppliers will provide a link to the WUEdata submittals of their Water Loss Audit Reports.
NOTES: Water Loss Audits provided in Appendix D.
4.4 Progress Toward Meeting the Water Loss Performance Standard Pursuant to Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(C), the City is required to provide data demonstrating whether the City met its State Water Board Water Loss Performance Standard in 23 California Code of Regulations Section 980.
The Water Loss Performance Standards do not have to be met until 2028. However, Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(C) still requires that the City includes data in its 2025 UWMP to show whether it met the requirement. Table 4-7 (DWR Table 4-6 Retail) provides an overview of the City’s progress towards meeting the 2028 water loss standards.
625
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
4-11
Table 4-7 – Progress Towards 2028 Water Loss Standard (DWR Table 4-6 Retail) Submittal Table 4-6 Retail: Progress Towards 2028 Water Loss Standard Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(C)
Public Water
System ID #
Reported in
Submittal Table
2-1 R
Did the Water Board
Calculate a Water Loss
Standard for this Public
Water System? (y/n)
If no, Supplier will not
complete this row.
Real Water Loss Apparent Water Loss
State Water Board Standard Most Recent AWWA Water Loss Audit Real Water
Loss Per
Unit per
Day
State Water Board Standard Most Recent AWWA Water Loss Audit Apparent
Water Loss Per
Unit per Day
2028 Real Water
Loss Standard per
Unit per day
Units for Real
Water Loss
Drop down list
Number of Units
(Connections or
Miles
corresponding
with units
selected)
Volume of Total
Real Loss (from
AWWA Water Loss
Audit)
2028 Apparent
Water Loss
Standard per Unit
per Day
Units for
Apparent
Water Loss
Number of
Connections
Volume of Total
Apparent Loss
(from AWWA
Water Loss Audit)
Add additional rows as needed.
CA5010014 Yes 12.24904344
Gallons per
Service
Connection
per Day
(gpscd)
8,320 324.68 34.8 11.11900067
Gallons per
Service
Connection
per Day
(gpscd)
8,320 69.46 7.5
Water Board's Calculated Water Loss Standards
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) for Water Loss MUST remain consistent with units reported in Submittal Table 2-3. The units reported in Submittal Table 2-3 are used in this table's calculations.
NOTES: No additional notes.
626
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
5-1
5 SB X7-7 Baselines, 2020 Targets, and 2025 Reporting
With the adoption of the Water Conservation Act of 2009, also known as the SB X7-7, the State of California was required to reduce urban per capita water use by 20 percent by the year 2020 (i.e., “20 by 2020”). CWC Section 10608.16(a) states: “The state shall achieve a 20-percent reduction in urban per capita water use in California on or before December 31, 2020.” To achieve this statewide objective, the Legislature required each urban retail water supplier subject to the UWMPA to develop an urban water use target to help the state collectively achieve a 20-percent reduction.
This chapter provides a description of the methodology used to calculate the City’s compliance with SB X7-7 requirements.
5.1 Baseline and Target Calculations for 2025 UWMPs
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10608.40:
Urban water retail suppliers shall report to the department on their progress in meeting their urban water use targets as part of their urban water management plans submitted pursuant to Section 10631.
CWC Section 10608.12:
(af) “Urban retail water supplier” means a water supplier, either publicly or privately owned, that directly provides potable municipal water to more than 3,000 end users or that supplies The City is required under the CWC to report its progress toward achieving the 2020 water use reduction target. In its 2020 UWMP, the City established SB X7-7 baselines and a 2020 target of 180 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The City did not meet this target in 2020 and remains out of compliance as of 2025 with the submittal of this UWMP.
As shown in Table 5-1 (DWR Table 5-1 Retail), both the 2020 and 2025 actual water use exceed the target value. Additional details, including the methodology used to calculate the 2025 gpcd, are provided in the SB X7-7 Compliance Form included in Appendix E.
627
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
5-2
Table 5-1 – SBX7-7 2020 Target Progress (DWR Table 5-1 Retail) Submittal Table 5-1 Retail: SB X7-7 2020 Target Progress Water Code Section 10608.40
Check the box if the Supplier was not an Urban Water Supplier during or before the 2020 UWMP reporting cycle. Proceed to the next table.
Was Supplier
part of a
merger or
consolidation
since 2020?
Regional
Alliance
Target or
Individual
Target?
Drop down
list
2020 Target Actual
2020 GPCD
Did
Supplier
Achieve
Targeted
Reduction
for 2020?
Only for suppliers that did
not meet the Target in
2020
See DWR NOTES below.
Actual 2025
GPCD
(From SB X7-
7 Compliance
Form)
Did Supplier
meet the
2020 Target
in 2025?
No Individual 180 201 No 184 No
DWR NOTES:
Suppliers calculating a 2025 GPCD will need to complete and submit SB X 7-7 Compliance Tables to verify the use of SB X7-7 Methodologies.
Suppliers that were part of a merger or consolidation since 2020 see Chapter 5 and Appendix P for guidance.
NA=Not Applicable
NOTES: 2020 Target GPCD value was not met in 2020 or 2025 but effort has been made to mitigate the water usage in the City as demonstrated by the reduction in GPCD values from 2020 to 2025.
5.2 Funding Eligibility
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10608.56:
On and after July 1, 2016, an urban retail water supplier is not eligible for a water grant or loan awarded or administered by the state unless the supplier complies with this part.
The City has not met the 2020 Target and is therefore not eligible to receive water-related grants or loans from the State of California, unless either of the two (2) following exceptions apply:
1. Section 10608.56 (c) states that a water supplier shall be eligible for a water loan or grant if it “has submitted to the department for approval a schedule, financing plan, and budget to be included in the grant or loan agreement, for achieving the per capita reductions.”
2. Section 10608.56 (e) states that a water supplier can also be eligible for a water loan or grant if it “has submitted to the department for approval documentation demonstrating that its entire service area qualifies as a disadvantaged community.”
628
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-1
6 Water Supply Characterization
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(b):
Identify and quantify, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water available to the supplier as described in subdivision (a) [in five-year increments to 20 years or as far as data is available] 1, providing supporting and related information, including all of the following:
(1) A detailed discussion of anticipated supply availability under a normal water year, single dry year, and droughts lasting at least five years, as well as more frequent and severe periods of drought, as described in the drought risk assessment. For each source of water supply, consider any information pertinent to the reliability analysis conducted pursuant to Section 10635, including changes in supply due to climate change.
(2) When multiple sources of water supply are identified, a description of the management of each supply in correlation with the other identified supplies. (3) For any planned sources of water supply, a description of the measures that are being undertaken to acquire and develop those water supplies.
CWC 10631 (h):
... The wholesale agency shall provide information to the urban water supplier for inclusion in the urban water supplier’s plan that identifies and quantifies, to the extent practicable, the existing and planned sources of water as required by subdivision (b), available from the wholesale agency to the urban water supplier over the same five-year increments, and during various water-year types in accordance with subdivision (f). An urban water supplier may rely upon water supply information provided by the wholesale agency in fulfilling the plan informational requirements of subdivisions (b) and (f).
The UWMPA requires that the UWMP include a description of the agency’s existing and future water supply sources for the next 20 years. This chapter will provide the following information:
• Existing and planned sources of water;
• Projections of the water supplies over five-year increments through 2045; • Description of anticipated availability under normal, single dry, and five-year droughts; • Description of the management of each supply in correlation; and • Description of information pertinent to the reliability of the supplies, including considerations for climate change effects.
6.1 UWMP Water Supply Characterization
The following sections of this chapter discuss the varying water supply availability based on the supply type which includes:
• Purchased or Imported Water
• Groundwater
• Surface Water
• Stormwater
629
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-2
• Wastewater and Recycled Water
• Desalinated Water
• Water Exchanges and Transfers
• Supply from Storage
• Other Water Supplies
• Future Water Projects
6.1.1 Purchased or Imported Water
To reduce reliance on groundwater resources and enhance supply reliability under varying hydrologic conditions, the City has diversified its water supply portfolio by entering into an agreement with the OID to receive non-potable surface water. Under this agreement, the City is allocated up to 10,000 AFY of surface water.
Because this supply is non-potable, its primary intended use is for landscape irrigation, particularly at public parks and other municipal facilities. Although the agreement with OID was established prior to the previous UWMP, surface water deliveries did not commence until the necessary conveyance infrastructure was constructed. In 2024, OID began delivering surface water to Greger Sports Park and Bridle Ridge Dog Park. Since then, approximately 46 AF have been delivered to Greger Sports Park and an estimated 21.5 AF to Bridle Ridge Dog Park.
While the City’s allocation of 10,000 AFY is considered a firm contractual right, the long-term availability of this supply is not guaranteed. Increasing statewide demand, recurring drought conditions, and the impacts of climate change may result in future re-evaluation of water rights in California. As such, maintaining beneficial use of this allocation will be important to preserve the City’s access to this supply.
6.1.2 Groundwater
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(b)(4):
If groundwater is identified as an existing or planned source of water available to the supplier, all of the following information:
(A) The current version of any groundwater sustainability plan or alternative adopted pursuant to Part
2.74 (commencing with Section 10720), any groundwater management plan adopted by the urban water supplier, including plans adopted pursuant to Part 2.75 (commencing with Section 10750), or any other specific authorization for groundwater management for basins underlying the urban water supplier’s service area.
(B) A description of any groundwater basin or basins from which the urban water supplier pumps groundwater. For basins that a court or the board has adjudicated the rights to pump groundwater, a copy of the order or decree adopted by the court or the board and a description of the amount of groundwater the urban water supplier has the legal right to pump under the order or decree. For a basin that has not been adjudicated, information as to whether the department has identified the basin as a high- or medium-priority basin in the most current official departmental bulletin that characterizes the condition of the groundwater basin, and a detailed description of the efforts being undertaken by the urban water supplier to coordinate with groundwater sustainability agencies or groundwater management agencies listed in subdivision (c) of Section 10723 to maintain or achieve sustainable groundwater conditions in accordance with a groundwater sustainability plan or alternative adopted pursuant to Part 2.74 (commencing with Section 10720).
630
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-3
(C) A detailed description and analysis of the location, amount, and sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the urban water supplier for the past five years. The description and analysis shall be based on information that is reasonably available, including, but not limited to, historic use records. (D) A detailed description and analysis of the amount and location of groundwater that is projected to be pumped by the urban water supplier. The description and analysis shall be based on information that is reasonably available, including, but not limited to, historic use records.
Through 2025, groundwater supplies were used to meet all potable water needs in the City. The local groundwater source is the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin, specifically the Modesto Subbasin. The San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin is designated as a DWR high priority basin.
The City currently operates 7 active wells with a firm well capacity of approximately 9,179 gpm. The capacities of wells currently in service are provided in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1 – Well Capacity
Well Name Well Capacity (gpm)
Well 4 1,150
Well 5 1,900
Well 6 1,112
Well 7 1,280
Well 8 1,887
Well 9 1,850
Well 10 1,939
Peak Well Capacity 11,118
Firm Well Capacity 9,179
(a) Well pump capacity, as reported in the Water Master Plan [2].
Groundwater quality constraints and their potential effects on water supply reliability are discussed further in Chapter 7.
6.1.2.1 Groundwater Basin Description
The Modesto Subbasin is located on the central portion of California’s San Joaquin Valley and lies primarily within Stanislaus County, with small portions extending into San Joaquin County and Merced County. The Subbasin is bound by the Tuolumne River to the south, the Stanislaus River to the north, the San Joaquin River to the west, and the eastern extent of the Sierra Nevada foothills and underlying crystalline basement rock outcrops to the east. The Subbasin underlies a region characterized by a combination of agricultural, urban, and rural land uses distributed throughout the basin.
The Modesto Subbasin encompasses approximately 245,253 acres [3]. Agricultural land uses account for a substantial portion of water consumption within the subbasin and are comprised primarily of irrigated cropland, orchards, vineyards, and pasturelands. Native vegetation and open space areas are present primarily along river corridors and in foothill areas, while urban development is concentrated within incorporated cities, including the City, as well as in surrounding unincorporated communities. Over time, the subbasin has experienced a gradual increase in urban land uses, largely associated with population growth within city boundaries and along major transportation corridors. 631
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-4
Agricultural development within the Modesto Subbasin expanded significantly during the mid-20th century with the conversion of non-irrigated lands to irrigated agriculture. While agricultural land use has generally stabilized in recent decades, changes in crop types and irrigation practices continue to influence groundwater demand. Urban land uses have increased steadily, particularly within incorporated cities and adjacent areas, resulting in increased municipal and industrial groundwater pumping in localized areas.
Groundwater is a critical water supply source for municipal, industrial, and agricultural users throughout the Modesto Subbasin. Many urban water systems, including the City, rely primarily on groundwater to meet existing and projected demands. The groundwater aquifer from which the City obtains its water is not adjudicated. An adjudication consists of a groundwater basin in which all rights to water could be defined by a court. As a non-adjudicated basin, there are no defined legal pumping rights for the City and there are no legal constraints on groundwater pumping.
As urban growth and agricultural water needs continue, coordinated groundwater management and continued evaluation of groundwater conditions are essential to ensure the long-term sustainability of the Modesto Subbasin. In September 2014, Governor Brown signed the SGMA into law. This legislation is intended to provide a framework for local agencies to manage groundwater supplies and to restrict state intervention, if required. The three legislative bills that make up the SGMA are AB 1739, SB 1319, and SB 1168. The SGMA requires local agencies with basins classified as high-priority to form GSAs and to prepare and implement a GSP to achieve long-term groundwater sustainability and avoid undesirable results. The Modesto Subbasin was classified as a high-priority basin in the California Statewide Groundwater Elevation Monitoring program in 2014. In response to SGMA, eligible local agencies within the Modesto Subbasin coordinated to form multiple GSAs covering the entire Subbasin, including the STRGBA.
The STRGBA GSA is a joint powers authority composed of multiple local agencies, including City of Modesto, Modesto Irrigation District, the City, Oakdale Irrigation District, City of Riverbank, City of Waterford, and Stanislaus County. The STRGBA GSA is responsible for implementing SGMA requirements and managing groundwater resources in the subbasin in a coordinated, sustainable manner.
A map displaying the boundaries of the Modesto Subbasin and the GSA breakdown is displayed in Figure 6-1.
632
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-5
Figure 6-1 – Modesto Groundwater Subbasin Location and Boundaries Source: Modesto Subbasin Revised 2024 GSP.
The STRGBA GSA prepared a GSP for all local agencies previously mentioned, including the City, to guide groundwater management through the SGMA planning horizon of at least 2042. The GSP was submitted to the DWR, adopted on June 25, 2024, and revised in July 2024. The GSP establishes basin-specific sustainable management criteria and identifies projects and management actions intended to avoid undesirable results, including chronic lowering of groundwater levels, reductions in groundwater storage, seawater intrusion, degraded water quality, land subsidence, and depletions of interconnected surface waters.
6.1.2.2 Past Five Years
Table 6-2 (DWR Table 6-1 Retail) lists the groundwater volume pumped by the City from the Modesto Subbasin for the past five years.
633
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-6
Table 6-2 – Groundwater Volume Pumped (DWR Table 6-1 Retail) Submittal Table 6-1 Retail: Groundwater Volume Pumped
Water Code Section 10631(4) and 10631(4)(c)
Check the box if the Supplier does not pump groundwater.
Proceed to the next table.
Check the box if all or part of the groundwater described below is desalinated. (OPTIONAL)
Groundwater Type
Drop Down List
May use each category
multiple times
Potable or
NonPotable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down
list
Location or
Basin Name 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Add additional rows as needed
Alluvial Basin Potable Modesto
Subbasin 5,203 5,179 4,820 5,064 4,779
Total 5,203 5,179 4,820 5,064 4,779
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: No additional notes.
6.1.2.3 Projected
With implementation of the 2028 Water Loss Standard, as discussed in Section 4, the City plans to implement additional practices and operational measures to further reduce water losses within the distribution system. However, while these improvements will reduce water losses, continued growth within the City is expected to increase overall water demand.
Population increases and expansion of the water system are expected to result in higher overall water demand. Consequently, groundwater production is projected to increase to meet future demands.
Additional details regarding projected groundwater demand and usage are provided in Section 6.1.10.
6.1.3 Surface Water
The City has the potential to receive up to 10,000 AFY of surface water through entitlements held by the OID. Currently, City received 67.5 AF in the last 2 years for park/landscape irrigation. As additional implementation uses are explored, the expected use of surface water via OID’s supplies will likely increase, however, it is not known at this time when the implementation year date will occur. 634
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-7
6.1.4 Stormwater
The City maintains and operates its own storm drain system within the City limits. The storm drain system consists of several discharge locations directly into the Stanislaus River and multiple discharge locations along OID facilities, detention basins, dry wells, and French drains. The City utilizes an agreement with OID to discharge excess storm runoff into OID facilities during the fall and winter months while the district is not running irrigation water and the pipelines are drained [1].
Additionally, the City has existing infrastructure for stormwater to recharge groundwater basins and control road flooding.
6.1.5 Wastewater and Recycled Water
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10633:
The plan shall provide, to the extent available, information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier. The preparation of the plan shall be coordinated with local water, wastewater, groundwater, and planning agencies that operate within the supplier’s service area, and shall include all of the following:
(a) A description of the wastewater collection and treatment systems in the supplier’s service area, including a quantification of the amount of wastewater collected and treated and the methods of wastewater disposal.
(b) A description of the quantity of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, is being discharged, and is otherwise available for use in a recycled water project. (c) A description of the recycled water currently being used in the supplier’s service area, including, but not limited to, the type, place, and quantity of use.
(d) A description and quantification of the potential uses of recycled water, including, but not limited to, agricultural irrigation, landscape irrigation, wildlife habitat enhancement, wetlands, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge, indirect potable reuse, and other appropriate uses, and a determination with regard to the technical and economic feasibility of serving those uses. (e) The projected use of recycled water within the supplier’s service area at the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and a description of the actual use of recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected pursuant to this subdivision.
(f) A description of actions, including financial incentives, which may be taken to encourage the use of recycled water, and the projected results of these actions in terms of acre-feet of recycled water used per year.
(g) A plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the supplier’s service area, including actions to facilitate the installation of dual distribution systems, to promote recirculating uses, to facilitate the increased use of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, and to overcome any obstacles to achieving that increased use.
The UWMPA requires that the UWMP address the opportunities for development of recycled water, including the description of existing recycled water applications, quantities of wastewater currently being treated to recycled water standards, limitations on the use of available recycled water, an estimate of projected recycled water use, the feasibility of said projected uses, and practices to encourage the use of recycled water.
635
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-8
6.1.5.1 Recycled Water Coordination
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10633:
The plan shall provide, to the extent available, information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier. The preparation of the plan shall be coordinated with local water, wastewater, groundwater, and planning agencies that operate within the supplier’s service area…
All of the City’s wastewater is treated at the Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). The facility is permitted to treat 2.44 million gallons per day. The City is currently evaluating opportunities for recycled water implementation through a Recycled Water Feasibility Study, which assesses potential users, infrastructure requirements, regulatory considerations, and project alternatives for beneficial reuse. The study is intended to identify the most practical and cost-effective approach for integrating recycled water into the City’s water supply portfolio while supporting long-term sustainability goals.
6.1.5.2 Wastewater Collection, Treatment, and Disposal
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10633(a):
A description of the wastewater collection and treatment systems in the supplier’s service area, including a quantification of the amount of wastewater collected and treated and the methods of wastewater disposal.
The City wastewater collection system consists of approximately 70 miles of gravity sewers ranging from 4-inch to 27-inch diameter, with 11 pump stations and 11 low-pressure force mains. Available data indicates that pipe materials within the system include concrete, vitrified clay, polyvinyl chloride, highdensity polyethylene, asbestos cement, and tile pipe. The collection system leads to a triple barrel inverted siphon consisting of a 12-inch, 14-inch, and 18-inch sewer line, referred to as the River Crossing, which begins near the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Oak Avenue and crosses the Stanislaus River to the WWTF. This inverted siphon directs all wastewater across the Stanislaus River for treatment and disposal at the City’s WWTF.
The WWTF is located at 9700 Liberini Avenue in Oakdale, CA, on the north side of the Stanislaus River.
The site consists of approximately 40 acres. The WWTF was first constructed in the mid-1960s, and has undergone improvement projects in 1984, 1990, 2000, and most recently in 2009. The WWTF currently consists of a headworks with a screen and grit chamber, two Biolac® aeration basins, two secondary clarifiers, a filter pump station, cloth disk filters, UV disinfection channels, two sludge dewatering presses, sludge drying beds, and percolation ponds.
Table 6-3 (DWR Table 6-2 Retail) summarize wastewater flow volumes collected within the service area during 2025.
636
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-9
Table 6-3 – Wastewater Collected within Service Area (DWR Table 6-2 Retail) Submittal Table 6-2 Retail: Wastewater Collected Within Service Area Water Code Section 10633(a)
Check the box if there is no wastewater collection system.
Proceed to the next table.
Percentage of 2025 service area served by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL)
Percentage of 2025 service area population served by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL)
Wastewater Collection Recipient of Collected Wastewater Name of Wastewater
Collection Agency
Wastewater
Volume
Metered or
Estimated?
OPTIONAL
Drop Down
List
Volume of
Wastewater
Collected from
UWMP Service
Area 2025
Name of Wastewater
Treatment Plant
(WWTP) and Place ID
Number
Drop down list
Is WWTP
Located
Within
UWMP
Area?
Drop Down
List
Add additional rows as needed
City of Oakdale Metered 1,893 Oakdale Wastewater
Treatment Facility No
Total Wastewater Received from
UWMP Service Area in 2025: 1,893
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
Additional Guidance. See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.
NOTES: No additional notes.
Table 6-4 (DWR Table 6-3 Retail) provides the quantity of wastewater treated and disposed of within the City’s service area.
637
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-10
Table 6-4 – Wastewater Treatment and Discharge within UWMP Service Area (DWR Table 6-3 Retail) Submittal Table 6-3 Retail: Wastewater Treatment and Outcomes Within UWMP Service Area Water Code Section 10633(a)
Check the box if no wastewater is treated or disposed of within the UWMP service area.Proceed to the next table.
Wastewater
Treatment Plant
Name and Place ID
Number
Drop down list
Does This
Plant Treat
Wastewater
Generated
Outside the
UWMP
Service Area?
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
2025 Volume
of
Wastewater
Received
from UWMP
Service Area
(As Reported
in Submittal
Table 6-2 R )
Total
2025
Volume
of Water
Treated
2025 Outcomes of Treated Wastewater
Water Recycled Within
UWMP Service Area
(enter data as applicable)
Water Recycled
Outside of UWMP
Service Area
(enter data as applicable)
Effluent Discharge that
is not a Permitted
Recycled Water Use
(enter data as applicable)
Required Discharge for
Instream Flow
(enter data as applicable)
Delivered to Another Entity for Additional
Treatment
(enter data as applicable)
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
Treatment
Level
Drop down list Volume
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume
Treatment
Level
Drop down list
Volume Name of other entity
Add additional rows as needed
Oakdale WWTF,
Place ID 245602 No 1,893 1,893 Tertiary 1,893
Total 1,893 1,893 0 1,893 0 0
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3. IPR: Indirect Potable Reuse would have the treatment level of its end use requirement in the Level of Treatment drop-down. Additional Guidance. See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.
NOTES: No additional Notes.
638
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-11
6.1.5.3 Recycled Water System Description
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10633 (c):
A description of the recycled water currently being used in the supplier’s service area, including, but not limited to, the type, place, and quantity of use.
No recycled water is currently being used in the City’s service area.
6.1.5.4 Current, Potential, and Projected Recycled Water Uses Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10633:
(b) A description of the quantity of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, is being discharged, and is otherwise available for use in a recycled water project. (d) A description and quantification of the potential uses of recycled water, including, but not limited to, agricultural irrigation, landscape irrigation, wildlife habitat enhancement, wetlands, industrial reuse, groundwater recharge, indirect potable reuse, and other appropriate uses, and a determination with regard to the technical and economic feasibility of serving those uses. (e) The projected use of recycled water within the supplier’s service area at the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and a description of the actual use of recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected pursuant to this subdivision.
In 2025, the WWTF produced approximately 1,893 AF of filtered, disinfected effluent. However, the WWTF does not currently satisfy Title 22 reliability and redundancy requirements for recycled water use.
In addition, regulatory actions, including submittal and approval of a Title 22 Engineering Report by the State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water, would be required before recycled water could be approved for use. Potential opportunities for using recycled wastewater include (1) discharge of recycled water to OID and (2) irrigation of nearby farmland.
The City is currently conducting a Recycled Water Feasibility Study to evaluate the most practical and costeffective uses of this resource. This effort includes assessing potential end users, infrastructure requirements, regulatory considerations, and implementation strategies to support long-term water supply sustainability.
Because the City has not yet incorporated recycled water into their system and preliminary findings of the Recycled Water Feasibility Study indicate that use of recycled water within the City water services may not be cost effective, Tables 6-5 (DWR Table 6-4 Retail) and 6-6 (DWR Table 6-5 Retail) show that there are no current or projected beneficial uses of recycled water within the service area. 639
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-12
Table 6-5 – Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area (DWR Table 6-4 Retail) Submittal Table 6-4 Retail: Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area Water Code Section 10633 (c),(d),(e) Check box if recycled water is not used and is not planned for use within the service area of the supplier. The supplier will only complete the column on "Potential Recycled Water Use" and submit an accompanying narrative on the feasibility of that potential recycled water use.
Name(s) of Facility/ies Producing (Treating) the Recycled Water (OPTIONAL) : Name of Supplier Operating the Recycled Water Distribution System (OPTIONAL) : Supplemental Water Added in 2025 (volume) Include units (OPTIONAL) : Source of 2025 Supplemental Water (OPTIONAL) :
Use Type
Drop down list
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Additional Information
(as needed) 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Potential Recycled Water Use
Volume Narrative page number (OPTIONAL)
Add additional rows as needed
Subtotal Potable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Subtotal Non-Potable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table. Potential recycled water use: a description of the feasibility of these uses must be included in the narrative. Multiple Producers: If you have multiple recycled water producers, submit a separate table for each.
NOTES: No additional notes.
640
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-13
Table 6-6 – 2020 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2025 Actual (DWR Table 6-5 Retail)
Submittal Table 6-5 Retail: 2020 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2025 Actual
Water Code Section 10633 (e)
Check the box if recycled water was not used in 2025 nor previously projected for use in 2020.
Proceed to the next table.
Use Type
Drop Down list
2020 Projection
for 2025
2025 Actual
Use
Add additional rows as needed
Total 0 0
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3
Additional Guidance. See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.
NOTES: No additional notes.
6.1.5.5 Actions to Encourage and Optimize Future Recycled Water Use Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10633:
The plan shall provide, to the extent available, information on recycled water and its potential for use as a water source in the service area of the urban water supplier… and shall include the following:
(g) A plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the supplier’s service area, including actions to facilitate the installation of dual distribution systems, to promote recirculating uses, to facilitate the increased use of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, and to overcome any obstacles to achieving that increased use.
As described in earlier sections, recycled water is currently being reviewed as a potential water resource via a Recycled Water Feasibility Study. Until this study has been completed, there is no plan to use or expand recycled water as a future supply source, as documented in Table 6-7 (DWR Table 6-6 Retail). 641
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-14
Table 6-7 – Methods to Encourage Future Recycled Water Use (DWR Table 6-6 Retail) Submittal Table 6-6 Retail: Methods to Encourage Future Recycled Water Use Water Code Section 10633 (f)
Check the box if the Supplier does not plan to expand recycled water use in the future. Supplier will not complete the table below but will provide narrative explanation.
Provide page location of narrative in the UWMP
Name of Action Description
Planned
Implementation
Year
Expected Increase in
Recycled Water Use
Add additional rows as needed
Total 0
Unit Conversion to AF 0
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) MUST remain consistent with units reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
The units reported in Submittal Table 2-3 are used in this table's calculations.
The unit conversion to Acre Feet addresses the Water Code's requirement that this value be provided in acre-feet.
NOTES: No additional notes.
6.1.6 Desalinated Water Opportunities
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(g):
Describe the opportunities for development of desalinated water, including, but not limited to, ocean water, brackish water, and groundwater, as a long-term supply.
The City is located inland and does not have access to coastal waters; therefore, seawater desalination is not applicable and is not currently considered a technically or economically feasible water supply option.
Additionally, desalination of brackish surface water or groundwater is not presently required to meet municipal demands.
6.1.7 Water Exchanges and Transfers
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631(c):
Describe the opportunities for exchanges or transfers of water on a short-term or long-term basis.
As mentioned previously, the City has an agreement with OID for a surface water allocation of up to 10,000 AFY. Currently, the City uses OID surface water for landscape irrigation for Greger Sports Park and the Bridle Ridge Dog Park.
6.1.8 Supply from Storage
The City does not remove water from surface storage or underground storage. 642
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-15
6.1.9 Future Water Projects
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631 (f):
Include a description of all water supply projects and water supply programs that may be undertaken by the urban water supplier to meet the total projected water use, as established pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 10635. The urban water supplier shall include a detailed description of expected future projects and programs that the urban water supplier may implement to increase the amount of the water supply available to the urban water supplier in normal and single dry water years and for a period of drought lasting five consecutive water years. The description shall identify specific projects and include a description of the increase in water supply that is expected to be available from each project.
The description shall include an estimate with regard to the implementation timeline for each project or program.
City water supply projects and programs to meet the total projected water use described in the Water Master Plan include the construction of two new wells. A summary of expected future water supply projects is in Table 6-8 (DWR Table 6-7 Retail).
643
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-16
Table 6-8 – Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Programs (DWR Table 6-7 Retail) Submittal Table 6-7 Retail: Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Programs Water Code Section 10631 (f)
Check the box if there are no expected future water supply projects or programs that provide a quantifiable increase to the agency's water supply.
Proceed to the next table.
Check the box if some or all of the supplier's future water supply projects or programs are not compatible with this table and are described in a narrative format.
Provide page location of narrative in the UWMP
Name of
Future
Projects
or
Programs
Joint Project with
other suppliers?
Additional
Description
(as
needed)
Potable or
Non-Potable
(after
treatment if
treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down
list
Planned
Implementation
Year
Planned
for Use
in Year
Type
Drop
Down List
Expected
Increase
in
Water
Supply
to
Supplier
(This may
be a
range)
Drop
Down
List
(yes/no)
If Yes,
Supplier
Name
Add additional rows as needed
Well 11 No
Required
to meet
future
water
demands
Potable 2028 All Year
Types 600
Well 12 No
Required
to meet
future
water
demands
Potable 2028 All Year
Types 600
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Supply available based on capacity of wells in gpm multiplied by 8 hours per day for a year.
As the water supplied is from groundwater, the capacity is not expected to be altered by drought.
6.1.10 Summary of Existing and Planned Sources of Water This section describes the types of water that is supplied to the City and the quantity supplied by each water source.
644
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-17
6.1.10.1 Description of Supplies
The City’s water supply is solely dependent on groundwater extracted from the Modesto Subbasin of the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin, which currently meets all potable water demands through a system of seven active municipal wells. To improve supply reliability and reduce reliance on groundwater, the City has supplemented its portfolio with a non-potable surface water agreement with the OID, allowing for up to 10,000 AF per year for irrigation use, though current utilization remains limited. Planned projects, including the development of two additional wells, completion of a Recycled Water Feasibility Study, and a surface water feasibility study are intended to support future demand and enhance longterm water supply resilience under varying hydrologic conditions.
6.1.10.2 Quantification of Supplies
The actual (2025) water supplies for the City are summarized in Table 6-9 (DWR Table 6-8 Retail). The projected water supplies for the City are summarized in Table 6-10 (DWR Table 6-9 Retail).
Table 6-9 – Water Supplies – Actual (DWR Table 6-8 Retail) Submittal Table 6-8 Retail: Water Supplies — Actual
Water Code Section 10631(b)
Water Supply
Additional Description
(as needed)
2025
Drop down list
May use each category
multiple times. These are
the only water supply
categories that will be
recognized by the
WUEdata online submittal
tool
Potable or NonPotable
(after treatment
if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Actual
Volume
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR
Notes' below
Add additional rules as needed
Groundwater (not
desalinated) Modesto Subbasin Potable 4,779
Surface water (not
desalinated)
OID surface water for
park landscape irrigation Non-Potable 47
Subtotal Potable 4,779 0
Subtotal Non-Potable 47 0
Total 4,826 0
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
Total Entitlement: e.g. Water Right, Groundwater Allocation, Contracted Amount.
NOTES: No additional notes.
645
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-18
Table 6-10 – Water Supplies – Projected (DWR Table 6-9 Retail) Submittal Table 6-9 Retail: Water Supplies — Projected Water Code Section 10631 (b) Water Supply
Additional
Detail on
Water
Supply
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Projected Water Supply (Report to the Extent Practicable) Drop down list
May use each category multiple
times. These are the only water
supply categories that will be
recognized by the WUEdata
online submittal tool
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (opt)
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total
Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Add additional rows as needed
Groundwater (not
desalinated)
Modesto Subbasin Potable 4,759 4,824 4,896 4,985 -
Surface Water OID Supply Non-Potable 47 47 47 47 -
Subtotal Potable 4,759 0 4,824 0 4,896 0 4,985 0 0 0
Subtotal Non-Potable 47 0 47 0 47 0 47 0 0 0
Total 4,806 0 4,871 0 4,944 0 5,032 0 0 0
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. Total Entitlement: e.g. Water Right, Groundwater Allocation, Contracted Amount.
NOTES: As the City receives its potable water supply from a groundwater source, the projected supply available is equal to the projected demands. Agreement with OID currently allows Oakdale to receive 10,000 AFY however, the City does not have existing infrastructure to deliver this quantity of water. Current available volume is documented as the amount used for landscape irrigation. If droughts occur or fluctuation in water exchange changes, the available surface water supply may decrease. Surface water supply is projected to increase in the future. Completion of a surface water supply study is planned in the near future. 646
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
6-19
6.1.11 Special Conditions
Numerous special conditions may affect water supplies. Potential climate change impacts were discussed in Section 4.2.7. Water demand in the City has generally decreased over the past decade due to measures taken by the City that are further discussed in Chapter 9. Regulatory conditions and other locally applicable criteria are not anticipated to affect the City’s water supply.
6.2 Energy Use
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631.2. (a):
In addition to the requirements of Section 10631, an urban water management plan shall include any of the following information that the urban water supplier can readily obtain:
(1) An estimate of the amount of energy used to extract or divert water supplies. (2) An estimate of the amount of energy used to convey water supplies to the water treatment plants or distribution systems.
(3) An estimate of the amount of energy used to treat water supplies. (4) An estimate of the amount of energy used to distribute water supplies through its distribution systems.
(5) An estimate of the amount of energy used for treated water supplies in comparison to the amount used for nontreated water supplies.
(6) An estimate of the amount of energy used to place water into or withdraw from storage. (7) Any other energy-related information the urban water supplier deems appropriate.
Water energy intensity represents the total amount of energy expended, calculated on a whole-system basis, to deliver water to customers. Energy intensity is expressed in kilowatt-hours per acre-foot and reflects the energy required to convey water from its source through treatment and distribution to the point of delivery. Evaluating whole-system energy intensity enables the City to make informed decisions in managing its water supplies and operating its facilities, including:
• Identifying opportunities to reduce energy consumption • Estimating energy savings and greenhouse gas emission reductions associated with water conservation programs;
• Supporting applications for grants related to energy efficiency and water conservation initiatives; • Informing climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies; and • Benchmarking energy use across individual water supply, treatment, and distribution components and comparing performance with similar agencies.
Energy intensity was calculated using the tables provided by DWR. DWR Table O-1B was selected for reporting the water delivery product energy usage. The energy use tables for retail water delivery, wastewater, and recycled water are provided in Appendix F.
As discussed in Section 6.1.5, the City also provides wastewater collection and treatment services within its service area. However, because the City does not currently produce or distribute recycled water, energy intensity calculations associated with recycled water production and delivery are not applicable at this time.
647
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
7-1
7 Water Service Reliability and Drought Risk Assessment The UWMPA requires that the UWMP address the reliability of the City's long term water supplies. This includes a description of supply constraints which may impact the supply. Also included is a comparison between the City’s supply and demand for a normal year, single-dry year, and five-consecutive year drought.
7.1 Constraints on Water Sources
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631 (b)(1):
A detailed discussion of anticipated supply availability under a normal water year, single dry year, and droughts lasting at least five years, as well as more frequent and severe periods of drought, as described in the drought risk assessment. For each source of water supply, consider any information pertinent to the reliability analysis conducted pursuant to Section 10635, including changes in supply due to climate change.
Water Code Section 10634
The plan shall include information, to the extent practicable, relating to the quality of existing sources of water available to the supplier over the same five-year increments as described in subdivision (a) of Section 10631, and the manner in which water quality affects water management strategies and supply reliability.
Water Code Section 10635 (b)(2)
A determination of the reliability of each source of supply under a variety of water shortage conditions.
This may include a determination that a particular source of water supply is fully reliable under most, if not all, conditions.
Water Code Section 10635 (b)(4)
Considerations of the historical drought hydrology, plausible changes on projected supplies and demands under climate change conditions, anticipated regulatory changes, and other locally applicable criteria.
Evaluating the reliability of the City’s water supply is complex due to a variety of factors that can affect water source availability and dependability. These factors may include legal issues, environmental constraints, water quality, and climatic variations. The following sections describe these factors.
7.1.1 Legal
The supplies the City relies upon are neither in the process of adjudication nor the subject of any new legislation limiting them. Therefore, the City does not anticipate legal factors influencing the reliability of groundwater within the near term. However, that could change in the future, with any new updates made to the GSP.
648
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
7-2
7.1.2 Environmental
The status of environmental regulation in California changes due to new legislation, endangered species statuses, and other factors. Should new environmental legislation come into existence, it could potentially impact the City's available supply. The recent water supply reductions in the Bay-Delta are an example of environmental water needs versus community water supplies. The City does not anticipate environmental factors influencing groundwater reliability.
7.1.3 Water Quality
Water quality testing, as summarized in the City’s Consumer Confidence Reports for 2021 – 2024 (provided in Appendix G) shows that the City consistently meets or surpasses all U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and State drinking water health standards.
The City does not anticipate groundwater quality affecting groundwater reliability within the planning period. Nevertheless, as regulations become more stringent, sources may be required to have additional treatment to remain in compliance.
7.1.4 Climatic Factors
Climate change adds uncertainties to water supply planning. Changes to temperatures and precipitation patterns may impact water demands and supply availability. As discussed in Section 4.2.7, resource management strategies are being implemented to mitigate the effects of the potential impacts due to climate change.
7.2 Water Service Reliability Assessment (WSRA)
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10635(a):
Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, an assessment of the reliability of its water service to its customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry water years.
This water supply and demand assessment shall compare the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the long-term total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years. The water service reliability assessment shall be based upon the information compiled pursuant to Section 10631, including available data from state, regional, or local agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier.
Expected water service reliability pursuant to Section 10635 of the Water Code is assessed in the following sections.
7.2.1 WSRA Year-Type Characterization
This section addresses the reliability of the City’s water supply in average, single dry, and multiple dry water years. The City uses the following water year definitions from the 2025 UWMP Guidebook:
• Normal Year: a year, or an averaged range of years, that most closely represents the average water supply available to the agency. For the purposes of this UWMP, the terms “normal” and “average” are used interchangeably.
• Single-Dry Year: the year that represents the lowest water supply available to the agency. 649
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
7-3
• Five-Consecutive-Year Drought: the driest five-year historical sequence for the Supplier (Water Code Section 10612).
Table 7-1 (DWR Table 7-1 Retail) shows the basis of water year data as a percentage of average supply.
The base years were selected using rainfall data from CIMIS Station 194 in Oakdale. In addition, the available supply volume and the percentage relative to the average year are listed. The base year for the average year was selected by evaluating the ten-year per capita water use and determining the year that best represents the average.
Table 7-1 – Basis of Water Year Data (DWR Table 7-1 Retail) Year Type
Base Year
If not using a
calendar year,
type in the last
year of the fiscal,
water year, or
range of years,
for example,
water year 2024-
2025, use 2025
Available Supplies if
Year Type Repeats
Check the box if quantification of available
supplies is not compatible with this table and is
provided elsewhere in the UWMP.
Location: [insert location from UWMP]
Quantification of available supplies is provided in this table as either volume only, percent only, or both.
Volume Available % of Average Supply
Average Year 2024 5,085 100%
Single-Dry Year 2013 - 100%
Consecutive Dry Years 1st Year 2011 - 100%
Consecutive Dry Years 2nd
Year 2012 - 100%
Consecutive Dry Years 3rd
Year 2013 - 100%
Consecutive Dry Years 4th
Year 2014 - 90%
Consecutive Dry Years 5th
Year 2015 - 70%
DWR NOTES: Supplier may use multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R if different water sources have different base years and the supplier chooses to report the base years for each water source separately. If a Supplier uses multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R, in the "Note" section of each submittal table, state that multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R are being used and identify the particular water source that is being reported in each submittal table.
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table reports the units of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Volume available was estimated based on the volume pumped for the base year listed. % of Average Water Supply is rounded to the nearest 10%.
650
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
7-4
7.2.2 Service Reliability – Supply and Demand Comparison Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10635(a):
Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, an assessment of the reliability of its water service to its customers during normal, dry, and multiple dry water years.
This water supply and demand assessment shall compare the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the long-term total projected water use over the next 20 years, in five-year increments, for a normal water year, a single dry water year, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years. The water service reliability assessment shall be based upon the information compiled pursuant to Section 10631, including available data from state, regional, or local agency population projections within the service area of the urban water supplier.
The water service reliability for a Normal Year, Single-Dry Year, and Multiple Dry Years is discussed in the following sections.
7.2.2.1 Water Service Reliability – Normal Year
The availability of the City’s supplies in Normal Years is described in detail in Chapter 6.
As shown in Table 7-2 (DWR Table 7-2 Retail), the City’s Normal Year supplies are adequate to meet projected Normal Year demands through 2050.
Table 7-2 – Normal Year Supply and Use Comparison (DWR Table 7-2 Retail) Submittal Table 7-2 Retail: Normal Year Supply and Use Comparison Water Code Section 10635 (a)
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
(Opt)
Supply totals
(autofill from Submittal
Table 6-9 R)
4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals
(autofill from Submittal
Table 4-2 R)
4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 -
DWR NOTES : Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: No additional notes.
7.2.2.2 Water Service Reliability – Single-Dry Year
The City’s water supplies and demands for the Single-Dry Year are assumed to be equal to the Normal Year supply and demand for planning purposes, as shown in Table 7-1 (DWR Table 7-1 Retail). As the prominent supply source is groundwater, droughts do not affect the total water supply for single dry years.
651
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
7-5
As shown in Table 7-3 (DWR Table 7-3 Retail), the City’s Single-Dry Year supplies are adequate to meet projected Single-Dry Year demands.
Table 7-3 – Single Dry Year Supply and Use Comparison (DWR Table 7-3 Retail) Submittal Table 7-3 Retail: Single Dry Year Supply and Use Comparison Water Code Section 10635(a)
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (Opt)
Supply totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 -
DWR NOTES : Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: As the City receives its potable water supply from a groundwater source, the projected supply available is equal to the projected demands.
7.2.2.3 Water Service Reliability – Multiple Dry Years
Per CWC Section 10612, the five-consecutive-year drought is the driest five-year historical sequence for the supplier. The City’s water supply and demand for the five-consecutive-year drought are assumed to follow the pattern presented in Table 7-1 (DWR Table 7-1 Retail). As shown in Table 7-4 (DWR Table 7-4 Retail), the City’s five-consecutive-year drought supplies are adequate to meet projected demands. 652
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
7-6
Table 7-4 – Multiple Dry Years Supply and Use Comparison (DWR Table 7-4 Retail) Submittal Table 7-4 Retail: Multiple Dry Years Supply and Use Comparison Water Code Section 10635(a)
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (Opt)
First year
Supply totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 -
Second year
Supply totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 -
Third year
Supply totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 -
Fourth year
Supply totals 4,325 4,384 4,449 4,529 -
Use totals 4,325 4,384 4,449 4,529 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 -
Fifth year
Supply totals 3,364 3,410 3,461 3,522 -
Use totals 3,364 3,410 3,461 3,522 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 -
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Refer to Table 7-3 for explanation of Supply and Use Totals equal to each other. Per Table 7- 1 the fourth year and fifth year experience a factor reduction of 10% and 30%, respectively.
7.2.3 Description of Management Tools and Options
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10620(f):
An urban water supplier shall describe in the plan water management tools and options used by that entity that will maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions.
The City is implementing water management tools and options to maximize local resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions. These tools and options include membership in the STRGBA GSA and participation in implementing the GSP and resource management strategies, including studies to evaluate the feasibility of developing recycled water and surface water as alternative water sources.
The WSCP discusses measures for reducing water demands in case of water shortage conditions. 653
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
7-7
7.3 Drought Risk Assessment
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10612
“Drought Risk Assessment” means a method that examines water shortage risks based on the driest five-year historic sequence for the agency’s water supply, as described in subdivision (b) of Section 10635.
CWC Section 10635(b):
Every urban water supplier shall include, as part of its urban water management plan, a drought risk assessment for its water service to its customers as part of information considered in developing the demand management measures and water supply projects and programs to be included in the urban water management plan. The urban water supplier may conduct an interim update or updates to this drought risk assessment within the five-year cycle of its urban water management plan update. The drought risk assessment shall include each of the following:
(1) A description of the data, methodology, and basis for one or more supply shortage conditions that are necessary to conduct a drought risk assessment for a drought period that lasts five consecutive water years, starting from the year following when the assessment is conducted. (2) A determination of the reliability of each source of supply under a variety of water shortage conditions. This may include a determination that a particular source of water supply is fully reliable under most, if not all, conditions.
(3) A comparison of the total water supply sources available to the water supplier with the total projected water use for the drought period.
(4) Considerations of the historical drought hydrology, plausible changes on projected supplies and demands under climate change conditions, anticipated regulatory changes, and other locally applicable criteria.
This section provides a Drought Risk Assessment (DRA) based on the five driest consecutive years on record and plausible changes in climate, regulations, and other locally applicable criteria. A description of the data and methods used, basis for the supply shortage conditions, determination of the reliability of each source, and comparison of total water supplies and uses during a drought are provided below.
7.3.1 DRA Data, Methods, and Basis for Water Shortage Conditions The data used for the DRA is historical well data for 2011-2015, the driest five-year historical sequence for the City, and other historical records regarding the water system. Historical groundwater production data were evaluated to assess changes in well performance and system reliability during drought conditions and to determine whether drought-related supply constraints occurred. Additional information is available in the Modesto Subbasin GSP.
7.3.2 DRA Water Source Reliability
Based on historical well production data for 2011-2015, well production was not affected by drought conditions during a five-year drought period. Therefore, this DRA assumes that the total water supply is projected to be equivalent to a sustainable average groundwater production for each dry year.
Unforeseen water supply and quality issues, potential regulations on new contaminants, and changes in aquifer conditions may adversely affect the water supply and should be monitored closely. 654
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
7-8
7.3.3 Total Water Supply and Use Comparison
The total water supply and use comparison is shown in Table 7-5 (DWR Table 7-5 Retail). The comparison indicates that the City has sufficient water supply to meet projected demands during a five-year drought and that no water shortage condition is projected during the five-year drought scenario evaluated. The WSCP discusses measures for reducing water demands in case of water shortage conditions.
Table 7-5 – Five-Year Drought Risk Assessment (DWR Table 7-5 Retail) Submittal Table 7-5 Retail: Five-Year Drought Risk Assessment Water Code Section 10635(b)(3)
2026 Total
Total Water Use 4,815
Total Supplies 4,815
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
2027 Total
Total Water Use 4,805
Total Supplies 4,805
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
2028 Total
Total Water Use 4,795
Total Supplies 4,795
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
2029 Total
Total Water Use 4,320
Total Supplies 4,320
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
2030 Total
Total Water Use 3,364
Total Supplies 3,364
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain
consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Refer to Table 7-3 for explanation of Supply and Use Totals equal to each other. Per Table 7-1 the fourth year and fifth year experience a factor reduction of 10% and 30%, respectively.
655
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
8-1
8 Water Shortage Contingency Plan
In response to the severe drought of 2012-2016, legislation was adopted in 2018 mandating that the UWMP include a WSCP that provides a detailed proposal for assessing water supply availability and response actions to water shortage conditions. The WSCP is to be a stand-alone document, which will allow for amending the plan without amending the 2025 UWMP. The City WSCP is provided in Appendix H. Refer to the WSCP for the following DWR Tables:
• DWR Table 8-1: Cross-Reference for Standard vs Supplier Shortage Levels • DWR Table 8-2: Supply Augmentation and Other Actions
• DWR Table 8-3: Demand-Reduction Actions
656
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
9-1
9 Demand Management Measures
This chapter describes the City’s historical and existing Demand Management Measures (DMMs) implemented to promote water conservation and reduce demands on available water supplies. The discussion includes past, current, and projected DMMs. These measures are a key component of the City’s long-term water supply planning and are also integral to the effectiveness of the WSCP, which is provided in Appendix H.
In prior UWMPs, water suppliers were required to provide extensive data documenting progress in implementing specific DMMs. However, AB 2067, enacted in 2014, simplified and updated DMM reporting requirements. The revised framework shifted the focus from detailed documentation of individual measures to implementation of core conservation actions designed to support compliance with the water use efficiency targets established under SB X7-7.
For retail water suppliers, the number of required DMMs was reduced to six standardized measures, along with an additional “other” category. Under the current requirements, agencies must provide a narrative description of the status of each DMM and explain how these measures contribute to achieving water efficiency goals; detailed quantitative data are no longer required.
The following sections summarize the City’s current and planned efforts to implement the applicable DMMs.
9.1 Report Implementation
9.1.1 Implementation over the Past Five Years
All DMMs discussed in Section 9.2 have been implemented over the past five years and are continuing to be implemented. The City is committed to programs designed to conserve and protect the quantity and quality of its groundwater resource. The overall reduction of water and near-compliance with the SB X7- 7 2020 target indicates that the programs adopted in the community have been effective. The detailed activities and expenditure information for each program have not been closely tracked in the past. The City is planning to track and record these activities and costs in the future to determine the effectiveness of each current and future program.
9.1.2 Implementation to Achieve Water Use Targets
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631:
(e) Provide a description of the supplier’s water demand management measures. This description shall include all of the following:
(1)(A) …a narrative description that addresses the nature and extent of each water demand management measure implemented over the past five years.
As discussed in Chapter 5, the City has yet to meet the SB X7-7 2020 target. The City will continue to implement and improve the DMMs described below to reduce water demands and protect the groundwater supply.
657
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
9-2
9.2 Existing Demand Management Measures for Retail Suppliers Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10631:
(e)Provide a description of the supplier’s water demand management measures. This description shall include all of the following:
(1)(A) For an urban retail water supplier, as defined in Section 10608.12, a narrative description that addresses the nature and extent of each water demand management measure implemented over the past five years. The narrative shall describe the water demand management measure that the supplier plans to implement to achieve its water use targets pursuant to Section 10608.20. (B)The narrative pursuant to this paragraph shall include descriptions of the following water demand management measures:
(i)Water waste prevention ordinances.
(ii)Metering.
(iii)Conservation pricing.
(iv)Public education and outreach.
(v)Programs to assess and manage distribution system real loss. (vi)Water conservation program coordination and staffing support. (vii)Other demand management measures that have a significant impact on water use as measured in gallons per capita per day, including innovative measures, if implemented.
In accordance with Urban Water Management Plan requirements, this Plan addresses the following six DMMs:
• Water waste prevention ordinances
• Metering
• Conservation-oriented pricing
• Public education and outreach
• Programs to assess and manage distribution system real losses • Water conservation program coordination and staffing support In addition, the City is required to describe any other DMMs that have been implemented and have had a significant effect on water use within the service area.
This section describes both the DMMs currently in place and those planned for future implementation.
For each DMM, the discussion includes a description of the existing program, an overview of implementation activities during the previous five-year period, and a summary of planned future actions.
9.2.1 Water-Waste Prevention Ordinances
The City enforces water waste prevention requirements throughout its service area pursuant to the City of Oakdale Municipal Code, included as Appendix I, Chapter 35 Section 35-48 – Water Waste Not Permitted. This chapter defines prohibited uses of water, establishes standards for efficient water use, and declares certain nonessential water uses to be unlawful. Among other provisions, the municipal code prohibits the waste of water through the prohibition of the following activities:
658
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
9-3
• Failure to comply with the following schedule when watering lawns, plants, or garden, or using outdoor water for other purposes:
o No lawn/garden watering, or other outdoor use will be allowed between the hours of ten a.m. to seven p.m. every day.
o Dwellings or establishments with odd numbered street addresses shall use outdoor water only on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays and Sundays.
o Dwellings or establishments with even numbered street addresses shall use outdoor water only on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays and Sundays. • Watering lawns or gardens such that excess water leaves the property or area being watered; • Watering outdoor landscaping while raining;
• Washing vehicles, equipment or boats, during restricted days or hours; and/or using hoses without automatic shut-offs;
• Hosing down of concrete or asphalt curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways or slabs; • Having leaky faucets or plumbing fixtures on the premises.
City staff are authorized to enforce these requirements through administrative citations and penalties for violations, as specified in Municipal Code Chapter 35 Section 39 to 43. The full text of the Water Conservation Program and related enforcement provisions is available through the City’s Municipal Code of Ordinances on the City’s website at: https://www.oakdalegov.com/municipal-code.
9.2.2 Metering
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 526:
(a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, an urban water supplier that, on or after January 1, 2004, receives water from the federal Central Valley Project under a water service contract or subcontract... shall do both of the following:
(1) On or before January 1, 2013, install water meters on all service connections to residential and nonagricultural commercial buildings... located within its service area.
Water Code section 527
(a) An urban water supplier that is not subject to Section 526 shall do both the following:
(1) Install water meters on all municipal and industrial service connections located within its service area on or before January 1, 2025.
The City is fully metered for all customer classes, including separate meters for single family residential, commercial, and industrial and schools. Multiple family customers are metered but not necessarily individually by living unit.
The current water service rate structure is included in Appendix J. The rate structure is intended to raise sufficient funds to allow the City to properly maintain its water system. Funds to maintain and expand the system are also collected through development fees. The City additionally attended a public hearing on June 1, 2026 to consider changes to its current water rates. The proposed changes to the water rates are included in Appendix J.
659
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
9-4
9.2.3 Conservation Pricing
The City customers are charged a monthly fixed service fee based on meter size and volumetric usage per the metered water consumption. Volumetric water rates are established based on costs associated with water distribution within the City’s service area. Water use is billed in units of a centum cubic feet (CCF), regardless of meter size. The use of volumetric pricing provides a direct financial incentive for customers to reduce water consumption and adopt efficient water use practices.
Implementation of this DMM supports the City’s water use efficiency objectives by ensuring that customers pay rates that reflect the true cost of providing water service. This approach helps adequately fund system operations, maintenance, repair, and replacement programs, and ongoing water conservation efforts. The City will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of its rate structure by monitoring trends in unit water use in response to rate adjustments and is currently developing an updated rate structure.
9.2.4 Public Education and Outreach
The City seeks to promote lasting, sustainable changes in water use behavior through an active public education and outreach program, rather than relying solely on short-term responses during drought conditions.
The City distributes public information in its utility bills, press releases via newsletters, public meetings/hearings, and the City website.
These efforts are designed to increase customer awareness of water resource limitations, encourage efficient water use practices, and support compliance with local and State conservation requirements.
9.2.5 Programs to Assess and Manage Distribution System Real Loss The City conducts an annual water audit using software provided by the American Water Works Association (AWWA). Appendix D contains a copy of the water audits for 2020-2024. The results from the water audits were previously discussed in Chapter 4. Water audits are performed annually to identify leakage trends and determine whether and when corrective action to address leakage may be warranted.
9.2.6 Water Conservation Program Coordination and Staffing Support The City has designated staff to actively develop, promote, enforce, and maintain water conservation programs. These employees are responsible for responding to water complaints, monitoring water waste, issuing warnings and violations, and checking for excess landscape water use.
The effectiveness of this DMM is evaluated in conjunction with the success of the City’s water conservation efforts. As the City grows and water resources become more limited and expensive, water conservation programs will continue to expand and promote the importance of conservation.
Implementation of this DMM will continue to help the City achieve its water use targets by making implementation of the City’s water conservation program a top priority.
9.2.7 Other Demand Management Measures
In addition to the DMMs described above, the City has reduced large landscape water use in City parks through the use of irrigation timers with features such as temperature and moisture sensing. To help 660
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
9-5
mitigate water use, the City is also updating its municipal code to reflect more stringent water shortage levels. Additionally, the City has been working with OID to transition to non-potable water for irrigation at some parks.
Along with all other DMMs, the City is developing the implementation of programs to further reduce water demands and encourage water conservation including:
• Residential Water Survey Program
• Ion Water Online Tool
661
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
10-1
10 UWMP Adoption, Submittal, and Implementation
This chapter provides information regarding addressing the CWC requirements for public hearing, the UWMP adoption process, submitting an adopted UWMP and making the document available to the public, plan implementation, and the process for amending an adopted UWMP.
10.1 Inclusion of All 2025 Data
As indicated in Chapter 2, the City uses a calendar year for water supply and demand accounting, and therefore this 2025 UWMP includes data through December 2025.
10.2 Notice of Plan Preparation
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10621:
(b) Every urban water supplier required to prepare a plan shall…at least 60 days prior to the public hearing on the plan…notify any city or county within which the supplier provides waters supplies that the urban water supplier will be reviewing the plan and considering amendments or changes to the plan.
As described in Section 2.4 of this Plan, the City provided notice of its intent to prepare the 2025 UWMP and WSCP to cities and counties within its service area, as well as to other relevant public agencies that rely on the same water supplies. These notices were distributed more than 60 days prior to the public hearing, in compliance with statutory requirements. Copies of the notices of preparation are included in Appendix C.
10.3 Notice of Public Hearing
Legal Requirements:
Water Code Section 10642:
…Prior to adopting either [the plan or water shortage contingency plan], the urban water supplier shall make both the plan and the water shortage contingency plan available for public inspection and shall hold a public hearing or hearings thereon. Prior to any of these hearings, notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be published within the jurisdiction of the publicly owned water supplier pursuant to Section 6066 of the Government Code [see below]. The urban water supplier shall provide notice of the time and place of a hearing to any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies Notices by a local public agency pursuant to this section shall be provided pursuant to Chapter 17.5 (commencing with Section 7290) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code. A privately owned water supplier shall provide an equivalent notice within its service area.
Government Code Section 6066:
Publication of notice pursuant to this section shall be once a week for two successive weeks. Two publications in a newspaper published once a week or oftener, with at least five days intervening between the respective publication dates not counting such publication dates, are sufficient. The period of notice commences upon the first day of publication and terminates at the end of the fourteenth day, including therein the first day.
662
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
10-2
The City issued a Notice of Public Hearing and established a public review period prior to adoption of the 2025 UWMP and WSCP. The notice was issued in accordance with California Government Code Section 6066 and was published in the Oakdale Leader twice, for two successive weeks with seven days between publication dates. In addition, the notice was posted on the City website.
The Notice of Public Hearing included the date, time, and location of the public hearing, as well as information on where the draft plans could be reviewed by the public. A copy of the published notice is included in Appendix C.
Hard copies of the Draft 2025 UWMP were made available for public inspection at the City office, and an electronic version of the draft plan was also posted on the City website for public review.
The following interested parties and agencies also received notices of public hearing:
• Oakdale Irrigation District
• Stanislaus County
Table 10-1 (DWR Table 10-1 Retail) provides confirmation that the notification was provided at least 60 days prior to the public hearing of the plan. Copies of notification letters are included in Appendix C.
Table 10-1 – Notification to Cities and Counties (DWR Table 10-1 Retail) Submittal Table 10-1 Retail: Notification to Cities and Counties Water Code Section 10621(b) and 10642
City Name 60 Day Notice
Drop Down (yes/no)
Notice of Public
Hearing
Drop Down (yes/no)
Add additional rows as needed
County Name
Drop Down List
60 Day Notice
Drop Down (yes/no)
Notice of Public
Hearing
Drop Down (yes/no)
Add additional rows as needed
Stanislaus County Yes Yes
NOTES: No additional notes.
663
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
10-3
10.4 Public Hearing and Adoption
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10642:
Each urban water supplier shall encourage the active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the service area prior to and during the preparation of both the plan and the water shortage contingency plan. Prior to adopting either, the urban water supplier shall make both the plan and the water shortage contingency plan available for public inspection and shall hold a public hearing or hearings thereon…. After the hearing or hearings, the plan or water shortage contingency plan shall be adopted as prepared or as modified after the hearing or hearings.
Government Code Section 7291
…every local public agency… serving a substantial number of non-English-Speaking people, shall employ a sufficient number of qualified bilingual persons in public contact positions or as interpreters to assist those in such positions, to ensure provision of information and services in the language of the nonEnglish-speaking person.
The City has encouraged community involvement in the preparation of the 2025 UWMP and WSCP through public notices published in local newspapers and information posted on the City website. This section summarizes the public hearing process and formal adoption of the UWMP and WSCP.
10.4.1 Public Hearing
The public hearing provided the City water users and members of the general public with an opportunity to review the 2025 UWMP and ask questions regarding the City’s strategies for maintaining a reliable, safe, and high-quality water supply, as well as its approach to managing potential water shortage conditions. The public hearing was held on June 15, 2026, in conjunction with a regularly scheduled City Council meeting.
During the public hearing, the City also presented information regarding its compliance with the Water Conservation Act of 2009, including an overview of baseline water use, water use efficiency targets, current compliance status, the WSCP, and implementation of the UWMP.
10.4.2 Adoption
Following the public hearing, the City Council adopted the 2025 UWMP and the WSCP on June 15, 2026.
The WSCP was adopted through a separate resolution to allow for future updates independent of the UWMP, as needed. Copies of the adopted resolutions are provided in Appendix K. 664
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
10-4
10.5 Plan Submittal
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10621:
(e) Each urban water supplier shall update and submit its 2025 plan to the department by July 1, 2026… CWC Section 10635:
(c) The urban water supplier shall provide that portion of its urban water management plan prepared pursuant to this article to any city or county within which it provides water supplies no later than 60 days after the submission of its urban water management plan.
CWC Section 10644:
(a)(1) An urban water supplier shall submit to the department, the California State Library, and any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies a copy of its plan no later than 30 days after adoption.
10.5.1 Submitting a UWMP and Water Shortage Contingency Plan to DWR A copy of this 2025 UWMP, including the WSCP, will be submitted electronically to DWR within 30 days of adoption.
10.5.2 Electronic Data Submittal
This 2025 UWMP, including the WSCP and associated data, will be submitted to DWR electronically using the WUEdata submittal tool.
10.5.3 Submitting a UWMP, including WSCP, to the California State Library The 2025 UWMP, including WSCP, will be submitted in electronic or hardcopy format to the California State Library within 30 days of adoption.
10.5.4 Submitting a UWMP to Cities and Counties
The 2025 UWMP will be submitted in electronic format to Stanislaus County within 30 days of adoption.
10.6 Public Availability
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10645:
(a) Not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its plan with the department, the urban water supplier and the department shall make the plan available for public review during normal business hours. (b) Not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its water shortage contingency plan with the department, the urban water supplier and the department shall make the plan available for public review during normal business hours.
Upon submittal to DWR, this 2025 UWMP will be available for public review at the City’s main office during normal business hours. An electronic copy of this UWMP as well as the WSCP will also be available for review and download on the City’s website (https://www.oakdalegov.com/). 665
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
10-5
10.7 Notification to Public Utilities Commission
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10621 (c):
An urban water supplier regulated by the Public Utilities Commission shall include its most recent plan and water shortage contingency plan as part of the supplier’s general rate case filings.
The City is not regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission.
10.8 Plan Implementation
The 2025 UWMP will serve as the primary reference document for preparation of any SB 610 Water Supply Assessments or SB 221 Water Supply Verifications required for proposed projects between 2026 and 2030 that are subject to the California Environmental Quality Act and would result in water demands equal to or greater than those associated with a 500-dwelling-unit development. In addition, the 2025 UWMP provides guidance for the development of new local water supplies and the continued implementation of water conservation programs and recycled water initiatives necessary to meet future regulatory and conservation requirements.
10.9 Amending an Adopted UWMP or Water Shortage Contingency Plan Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10621:
(d) The amendments to, or changes in, the plan shall be adopted and filed in the manner set forth in Article 3 (commencing with Section 10640).
CWC Section 10644:
(a)(1) Copies of amendments or changes to the plans shall be submitted to the department, the California State Library, and any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies within 30 days after adoption.
10.9.1 Amending a UWMP
The plan may be updated at any time when the urban water supplier believes significant changes have occurred in population, land use, and/or water sources that may affect the contents of the plan. If major changes are made to the 2025 UWMP, the City will hold an additional public hearing and City Council will re-adopt the plan. Copies of amendments or changes to the plans will be submitted to DWR, the California State Library, and any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies within 30 days after adoption.
10.9.2 Amending a Water Shortage Contingency Plan
Legal Requirements:
CWC Section 10644 (b):
If an urban water supplier revises its water shortage contingency plan, the supplier shall submit to the department a copy of its water shortage contingency plan prepared…no later than 30 days after adoption, in accordance with protocols for submission and using electronic reporting tools developed by the department.
666
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
10-6
If the City revises the WSCP after DWR has approved the 2025 UWMP, copies of amendments or changes to the plans will be submitted electronically to the DWR through the WUEdata Portal within 30 days of its adoption.
Copies of the amended WSCP will also be sent to the California State Library and any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies within 30 days after adoption. 667
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
11-1
11 References
[1] Oakdale 2030 General Plan, City of Oakdale, adopted August 8, 2013. [2] 2022 Oakdale Water Master Plan, City of Oakdale, September 2022. [3] Revised Modesto Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan, STRGBA GSA, adopted June 25, 2024; revised July 2024.
[4] Stanislaus County Demographic and Employment Forecast 2025, University of the Pacific Center for Business and Policy Research for the Stanislaus County of Governments, January 24, 2025. [5] CIMIS Website, Station 194 Oakdale, Monthly Report, Printed March 2026 (https://cimis.water.ca.gov)
[6] U.S. Census Bureau. "ACS Demographic and Housing Estimates." American Community Survey, ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table DP05,
https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDP5Y2024.DP05?g=160XX00US0652694. Accessed on May 15, 2026.
[7] U.S. Census Bureau. "Financial Characteristics." American Community Survey, ACS 5-Year Estimates Subject Tables, Table S2503,
https://data.census.gov/table/ACSST5Y2024.S2503?g=160XX00US0652694. Accessed on May 15, 2026.
668
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
A
Appendix A
DWR UWMP Tables
669
CA5010014 City of Oakdale 8,335 4,826
8,335 4,826
Number of Municipal
Connections 2025
Volume of Water
Supplied 2025
Total
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Table 2-3.
NOTES: Unit of measure for volumes are in AF.
Add additional rows as needed
Submittal Table 2-1 Retail: Public Water Systems
Public Water System
Number
Public Water System
Name
670
Select
One or
Both
Name of Regional Alliance or
RUWMP (Drop Down List)
If Water Supplier is also a member of a SB X7-7
Regional Alliance, select name from the drop-down.
Regional Urban Water Management Plan (RUWMP)
If Supplier selected RUWMP, select name from the
drop-down.
NOTES: No additional notes.
Submittal Table 2-2: Plan Identification
Individual UWMP
Type of Plan
671
Supplier is a wholesale supplier
Supplier is a retail supplier
UWMP Tables are in calendar years
UWMP Tables are in fiscal years
Unit AF
Units of measure used in UWMP
(Select from the drop down list).
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent
throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: No additional notes.
If using fiscal years provide month and date that the fiscal year begins (mm/dd)
Submittal Table 2-3: Supplier Identification
Type of Supplier (select one or both)
Fiscal or Calendar Year (select one)
672
Submittal Table 2-4 Retail: Water Supplier Information Exchange Water Code Section 10631(h)
The retail Supplier has informed the following wholesale supplier(s) of projected water use.
Wholesale Water Supplier Name
Add additional rows as needed
N/A
NOTES: No additional notes.
673
2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050(opt)
23,132 23,271 23,607 23,977 24,429
Submittal Table 3-1 Retail: Population - Current and Projected Water Code Section 10631(a)
Population
Served
NOTES: Population projections are based on the Stanislaus County Demographic and Employment Forecast 2025 prepared by the University of the Pacific Center for Business and Policy Research for the StanCOG [4].
674
Use Type
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only use types that will be recognized by the WUEdata online submittal tool
Potable or Non-Potable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Volume
Single Family Single family and apartment
residential demands. Potable 2,772
Multi-Family Potable 258
Commercial Builder; Commercial; Utilities;
Construction; Manufacturing; Mining Potable 301
Industrial Potable 96
Institutional/Governmental Potable 60
Landscape City landscape irrigation Potable 1,015
Landscape OID surface water for park landscape
irrigation
Non-Potable 47
Other Unbilled Unmetered Consumption Potable 11
Distribution System Water Loss Potable 265
4,779
47 4,826
NOTES: Volume of Water Loss for 2025 was estimated based on water supplied and billed meter data and has not been audited. The "Other" water use category accounts for unbilled unmetered water consumption and is estimated as 0.25% of the total billed consumption, in accordance with the AWWA water loss audit form.
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
Total
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-
3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
Submittal Table 4-1 Retail: Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water — Actual Water Code Section 10631(d)(1)
Additional Description
(as needed)
2025 Actual Water Use
Add additional rows as needed
675
Use Type
Drop down list
May select each use multiple times
These are the only Use Types that will be recognized
by the WUEdata online submittal tool
Potable or Non-Potable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 opt
Single Family Single family and apartment
residential demands. Potable 2,789 2,829 2,873 2,927 -
Multi-Family Potable 260 264 268 273 -
Commercial
Builder; Commercial; Utilities;
Construction; Manufacturing;
Mining
Potable 303 307 312 318 -
Industrial Potable 97 98 99 101
Institutional/Governmental Potable 61 62 63 64 -
Landscape City landscape irrigation Potable 1,021 1,036 1,052 1,072 - Landscape OID surface water for park
landscape irrigation Non-Potable 47 47 47 47
Other Unbilled Unmetered
Consumption
Potable 11 11 12 12
Distribution System Water Loss Potable 218 218 218 218 - 4,759 4,824 4,896 4,985 -
47 47 47 47 -
Total 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Similar to projected population increases, the projected water use values are based on the same percentage increase from the Stanislaus County Demographic and Employment Forecast 2025. For non-potable landscape, water use is projected to stay consistent until further parks are added to the OID supply. For projected future water loss, the City is expecting to meet the 2028 Water Loss Standard set by the state and as such the maximum amount of water loss from the city is 218 AF per year by 2028 values.
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
Submittal Table 4-2 Retail: Total Uses for Potable, and Non-Potable Water — Projected Water Code Section 10631(d)(1)
Additional Description
(as needed)
Projected Water Use
(Report To the Extent that Records are Available)
Add additional rows as needed.
676
Are Future Water Savings Included in Projections?
Drop down list (y/n)
Yes
If "Yes" to above, state the section or page number, in the cell to the right, where citations of the codes, ordinances, or otherwise are utilized in demand projections are found.
Optional Suppliers may complete Optional Submittal Table 4-4 R to quantify the expected savings.
4-6
Are Lower Income Residential Demands Included In Projections? Drop down list (y/n)
Yes
Optional If the method for accounting Lower Income Residential Demands has been included, provide page number where this accounting can be found. 4-8 Submittal Table 4-3 Retail: Inclusion in Water Use Projections Water Code Section 10631 (a), 10631 (d)(4)(A), and 10631 (d)(4)(B) NOTES: No additional notes.
DWR NOTES: Additional guidance is provided in Appendix K. 677
Public Water System ID # Reported
in Table 2-1 R Reporting Period Submitted to DWR Water Loss Audit Program (yes/no) 2020 Yes
2021 Yes
2022 Yes
2023 Yes
2024 Yes
Submittal Table 4-5 Retail: Water Loss Audit Reporting
Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(A)
Report submittal status for all five years for each Public Water System as available.
Add rows as needed
DWR NOTES: Suppliers will provide a link to the WUEdata submittals of their Water Loss Audit Reports.
NOTES: Water Loss Audits provided in Appendix D.
678
2028 Real Water Loss
Standard per Unit per
day
Units for Real
Water Loss
Drop down list
Number of Units
(Connections or Miles
corresponding with
units selected)
Volume of Total Real
Loss (from AWWA
Water Loss Audit)
2028 Apparent
Water Loss Standard
per Unit per Day
Units for
Apparent Water
Loss
Number of
Connections
Volume of Total
Apparent Loss
(from AWWA Water
Loss Audit)
CA5010014 Yes 12.24904344
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
8,320 324.68 34.8 11.11900067
Gallons per
Service
Connection per
Day (GPSCD)
8,320 69.46 7.5
Submittal Table 4-6 Retail: Progress Towards 2028 Water Loss Standard Water Code Section 10631(d)(3)(C)
Public Water
System ID #
Reported in
Submittal Table
2-1 R
Did the Water Board Calculate a
Water Loss Standard for this
Public Water System? (y/n)
If no, Supplier will not complete
this row.
Real Water Loss Apparent Water Loss
State Water Board Standard Most Recent AWWA Water Loss Audit Real Water
Loss Per Unit
per Day
State Water Board Standard Most Recent AWWA Water Loss Audit Apparent Water
Loss Per Unit per
Day
Add additional rows as needed.
Water Board's Calculated Water Loss Standards
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) for Water Loss MUST remain consistent with units reported in Submittal Table 2-3. The units reported in Submittal Table 2-3 are used in this table's calculations.
NOTES: No additional notes.
679
Actual 2025 GPCD
(From SB X7-7
Compliance Form)
Did Supplier meet
the 2020 Target in
2025?
No Individual 180 201 No 184 No
NOTES: 2020 Target GPCD value was not met in 2020 or 2025 but effort has been made to mitigate the water usage in the City as perceived via the lower GPCD values from 2020 to 2025.
Submittal Table 5-1 Retail: SB X7-7 2020 Target Progress Water Code Section 10608.40
Check the box if the Supplier was not an Urban Water Supplier during or before the 2020 UWMP reporting cycle.
Proceed to the next table.
Was Supplier part of
a merger or
consolidation since
2020?
Regional Alliance
Target or
Individual
Target?
Drop down list
2020 Target Actual 2020 GPCD
Did Supplier
Achieve Targeted
Reduction for
2020?
Only for suppliers that did not meet the
Target in 2020
See DWR NOTES below.
DWR NOTES:
Suppliers calculating a 2025 GPCD will need to complete and submit SB X 7-7 Compliance Tables to verify the use of SB X7-7 Methodologies.
Suppliers that were part of a merger or consolidation since 2020 see Chapter 5 and Appendix P for guidance.
NA=Not Applicable
680
Groundwater Type
Drop Down List
May use each category
multiple times
Potable or
Non-Potable
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Location or Basin Name 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Alluvial Basin Potable Merced Subbasin 5,203 5,179 4,820 5,064 4,779 5,203 5,179 4,820 5,064 4,779
Submittal Table 6-1 Retail: Groundwater Volume Pumped
Water Code Section 10631(4) and 10631(4)(c)
Check the box if the Supplier does not pump groundwater.
Proceed to the next table.
Check the box if all or part of the groundwater described below is desalinated. (OPTIONAL) Add additional rows as needed
Total
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: No additional notes.
681
Name of Wastewater
Collection Agency
Wastewater
Volume Metered
or Estimated?
OPTIONAL
Drop Down List
Volume of Wastewater
Collected from UWMP
Service Area 2025
Name of Wastewater
Treatment Plant (WWTP) and
Place ID Number
Drop down list
Is WWTP Located
Within UWMP
Area?
Drop Down List
City of Oakdale Metered 1,893
Oakdale Wastewater
Treatment Facility No
1,893
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
Additional Guidance. See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.
NOTES: No additional notes.
Add additional rows as needed
Total Wastewater Received from UWMP
Service Area in 2025:
Submittal Table 6-2 Retail: Wastewater Collected Within Service Area Water Code Section 10633(a)
Check the box if there is no wastewater collection system.
Proceed to the next table.
Percentage of 2025 service area served by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL) Percentage of 2025 service area population served by wastewater collection system (OPTIONAL)
Wastewater Collection Recipient of Collected Wastewater 682
Treatment Level
Drop down list
Volume Treatment Level
Drop down list
Volume Treatment Level
Drop down list
Volume Treatment Level
Drop down list
Volume Treatment Level
Drop down list
Volume Name of other
entity
Oakdale WWTF, Place ID
245602
No 1,893 1,893 Tertiary 1893
1,893 1,893 0 0 1,893 0 0
Water Recycled Outside of
UWMP Service Area
(enter data as applicable)
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
IPR: Indirect Potable Reuse would have the treatment level of its end use requirement in the Level of Treatment drop-down.
Additional Guidance. See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.
NOTES: No additional notes.
Effluent Discharge that is
not a Permitted Recycled
Water Use
(enter data as applicable)
Water Recycled Within
UWMP Service Area
(enter data as applicable)
Add additional rows as needed
Total
Required Discharge for
Instream Flow
(enter data as applicable)
Delivered to Another Entity for Additional
Treatment
(enter data as applicable)
Submittal Table 6-3 Retail: Wastewater Treatment and Outcomes Within UWMP Service Area Water Code Section 10633(a)
Check the box if no wastewater is treated or disposed of within the UWMP service area.
Proceed to the next table.
Wastewater Treatment
Plant Name and Place ID
Number
Drop down list
Does This Plant
Treat
Wastewater
Generated
Outside the
UWMP Service
Area?
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
2025 Volume of
Wastewater
Received from
UWMP Service
Area
(As Reported in
Submittal Table
6-2 R )
Total 2025
Volume of
Water
Treated
2025 Outcomes of Treated Wastewater
683
Volume Narrative page number
(OPTIONAL)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Supplemental Water Added in 2025 (volume) Include units (OPTIONAL) :
Source of 2025 Supplemental Water (OPTIONAL) :
Use Type
Drop down list
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop down list
Additional Information
(as needed)
Potential Recycled Water Use
2030 2050
NOTES: No additional notes.
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
Additional Guidance: See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table.
Potential recycled water use: a description of the feasibility of these uses must be included in the narrative.
Multiple Producers: If you have multiple recycled water producers, submit a separate table for each.
Add additional rows as needed
Total
Submittal Table 6-4 Retail: Recycled Water Direct Beneficial Uses Within Service Area Water Code Section 10633 (c),(d),(e)
Check box if recycled water is not used and is not planned for use within the service area of the supplier. The supplier will only complete the column on "Potential Recycled Water Use" and submit an accompanying narrative on the feasibility of that potential recycled water use.
Name(s) of Facility/ies Producing (Treating) the Recycled Water (OPTIONAL) :
Name of Supplier Operating the Recycled Water Distribution System (OPTIONAL) :
2025 2035 2040 2045
684
2020 Projection
for 2025
2025 Actual
Use
0 0
Use Type
Drop Down list
Submittal Table 6-5 Retail: 2020 UWMP Recycled Water Use Projection Compared to 2025 Actual
Water Code Section 10633 (e)
Check the box if recycled water was not used in 2025 nor previously projected for use in 2020.
Proceed to the next table.
Add additional rows as needed
NOTES: No additional notes.
Total
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3 Additional Guidance. See Appendix M, Section M.21 for detailed guidance on this table. 685
Name of Action Description Expected Increase in Recycled Water Use
0 0
Submittal Table 6-6 Retail: Methods to Encourage Future Recycled Water Use Water Code Section 10633 (f)
Check the box if the Supplier does not plan to expand recycled water use in the future. Supplier will not complete the table below but will provide narrative explanation.
Provide page location of narrative in the UWMP
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) MUST remain consistent with units reported in Submittal Table 2-3. The units reported in Submittal Table 2-3 are used in this table's calculations.
The unit conversion to Acre Feet addresses the Water Code's requirement that this value be provided in acre-feet.
NOTES: No additional notes.
Planned Implementation Year
Total
Unit Conversion to AF
Add additional rows as needed
686
Drop Down
List
(yes/no)
If Yes, Supplier Name
Well 11 No
Required to meet future
water demands Potable 2028 All Year Types 600
Well 12 No
Required to meet future
water demands Potable 2028 All Year Types 600
Expected
Increase in
Water Supply
to Supplier
(This may be a
range)
Add additional rows as needed
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Supply available based on capacity of wells in gpm multiplied by 8 hours per day for a year. As the water supplied is from groundwater, the capacity is not expected to be altered from the drought.
Submittal Table 6-7 Retail: Expected Future Water Supply Projects or Programs Water Code Section 10631 (f)
Check the box if there are no expected future water supply projects or programs that provide a quantifiable increase to the agency's water supply.
Procees to the next table.
Check the box if some or all of the supplier's future water supply projects or programs are not compatible with this table and are described in a narrative format.
Provide page location of narrative in the UWMP
Name of Future Projects
or Programs
Joint Project with other suppliers?
Additional Description
(as needed)
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Planned
Implementation
Year
Planned for Use in
Year Type
Drop Down List
687
Water Supply
Drop down list
May use each category multiple times.
These are the only water supply
categories that will be recognized by the
WUEdata online submittal tool
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if
treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Actual Volume
Total Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See 'DWR Notes' below
Groundwater (not desalinated) Merced Subbasin Potable 4,779 Surface water (not desalinated) OID surface water for park landscape irrigation
Non-Potable 47
4,779 0
47 0
4,826 0
Submittal Table 6-8 Retail: Water Supplies — Actual
Water Code Section 10631(b)
Additional Description
(as needed)
2025
Add additional rules as needed
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
Total
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table identifies the unit of measure selected in Submittal Table 2-3.
Total Entitlement: e.g. Water Right, Groundwater Allocation, Contracted Amount.
NOTES: No additional notes.
688
Water Supply
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Reasonably
Available
Volume
Total Entitlement
(OPTIONAL)
See "DWR Notes"
below
Groundwater (not
desalinated)
Modesto
Subbasin Potable 4,759 4,824 4,896 4,985 -
Surface Water OID Supply Non-Potable 47 47 47 47 -
4,759 0 4,824 0 4,896 0 4,985 0 - 0
47 0 47 0 47 0 47 0 0 0
4,806 0 4,871 0 4,944 0 5,032 0 0 0
2045 2050 (opt)
Add additional rows as needed
Subtotal Potable
Subtotal Non-Potable
Total
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
Total Entitlement: e.g. Water Right, Groundwater Allocation, Contracted Amount.
NOTES: As the City receives it's potable water supply from a groundwater source, the projected supply available is equal to the projected demands. Agreement with OID currently allows Oakdale to receive 10,000 AFY however, the City does not have existing infrastructure to deliver this quantity of water. Current available non-potable water volume is documented as the amount used for landscape irrigation. If droughts occur or fluctuation in water exchange changes, the available surface water supply may decrease. Surface water supply is projected to increase in the future. Completion of a surface water supply study is planned in the near-future.
Submittal Table 6-9 Retail: Water Supplies — Projected
Water Code Section 10631 (b)
Additional
Detail on
Water
Supply
Potable or Non-Potable
(after treatment if treated)
(OPTIONAL)
Drop Down list
Projected Water Supply (Report to the Extent Practicable) Drop down list
May use each category multiple
times. These are the only water
supply categories that will be
recognized by the WUEdata online
submittal tool
2030 2035 2040
689
% of Average Supply
Average Year 2024 100%
Single-Dry Year 2013 100%
Consecutive Dry Years 1st Year 2011 100%
Consecutive Dry Years 2nd Year 2012 100%
Consecutive Dry Years 3rd Year 2013 100%
Consecutive Dry Years 4th Year 2014 90%
Consecutive Dry Years 5th Year 2015 70%
Volume Available
DWR NOTES: Supplier may use multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R if different water sources have different base years and the supplier chooses to report the base years for each water source separately. If a Supplier uses multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R, in the "Note" section of each submittal table, state that multiple versions of Submittal Table 7-1 R are being used and identify the particular water source that is being reported in each submittal table.
Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3. This table reports the units of measure reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Volume available was estimated based on the volume pumped for the base year listed. % of Average Water Supply is rounded to the nearest 10%.
5,085
OPTIONAL Submittal Table 7-1 Retail: Basis of Water Year Data (Reliability Assessment) Year Type
Base Year
If not using a calendar
year, type in the last
year of the fiscal,
water year, or range
of years, for example,
water year 2024-
2025, use 2025
Available Supplies if
Year Type Repeats
Check the box if quantification of available supplies is not compatible with this table and is provided elsewhere in the UWMP.
Location: [insert location from UWMP]
Quantification of available supplies is provided in this table as either volume only, percent only, or both.
690
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (Opt)
Supply totals
(autofill from Submittal Table 6-
9 R)
4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals
(autofill from Submittal Table 4-
2 R)
4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation
benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings
benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Submittal Table 7-2 Retail: Normal Year Supply and Use Comparison Water Code Section 10635 (a)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
DWR NOTES : Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: No additional notes.
691
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (Opt)
Supply totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply
augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction
savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
DWR NOTES : Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: As the City receives it's potable water supply from a groundwater source, the projected supply available is equal to the projected demands.
Submittal Table 7-3 Retail: Single Dry Year Supply and Use Comparison Water Code Section 10635(a)
692
2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 (Opt)
Supply totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Use totals 4,806 4,871 4,944 5,032 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 4,325 4,384 4,449 4,529 -
Use totals 4,325 4,384 4,449 4,529 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
Supply totals 3,364 3,410 3,461 3,522 -
Use totals 3,364 3,410 3,461 3,522 -
Surplus/(shortfall) 0 0 0 0 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
First year
Second year OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
NOTES: Refer to Table 7-3 for explanation of Supply and Use Totals equal to eachother. Per Table 7-1 the fourth year and fifth year experience a factor reduction of 10% and 30%, respectively.
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
Submittal Table 7-4 Retail: Multiple Dry Years Supply and Use Comparison Water Code Section 10635(a)
Fifth year OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
Fourth year OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions
Third year
693
2026 Total
Total Water Use 4,815
Total Supplies 4,815
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
2027 Total
Total Water Use 4,805
Total Supplies 4,805
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
2028 Total
Total Water Use 4,795
Total Supplies 4,795
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
2029 Total
Total Water Use 4,320
Total Supplies 4,320
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
2030 Total
Total Water Use 3,364
Total Supplies 3,364
Surplus/Shortfall w/o WSCP Action 0
WSCP - supply augmentation benefit
WSCP - use reduction savings benefit
Revised Surplus/(shortfall)
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: Refer to Table 7-3 for explanation of Supply and Use Totals equal to eachother. Per Table 7-1 the fourth year and fifth year experience a factor reduction of 10% and 30%, respectively.
OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) OPTIONAL Planned WSCP Actions (use reduction and supply augmentation) Submittal Table 7-5 Retail: Five-Year Drought Risk Assessment Water Code Section 10635(b)(3)
694
Standard
Shortage
Levels
Percent Shortage
Range
Suppliers
Shortage
Levels
Percent
Shortage Range
1 Up to 10%
2 Up to 20%
3 Up to 30%
4 Up to 40%
5 Up to 50%
6 >50%
Submittal Table 8-1: Cross-reference for Standard vs
Supplier Shortage Levels
Water Code Section 10632(a)(3)(B)
Check the box if the Supplier uses the Standard
six levels of water shortage.
Proceed to the next table.
NOTES:
695
Yes
Volume or
Percentage
Drop down
Shortage Gap
Reduction Value
(May be a range)
1-6 Transfers Percentage 1-10
OID supplies non-potable water to City parks.
In the future, the City may augment their
water supply with surface water. However,
this is not planned to occur in the near future.
1-6 Other Actions Percentage 1-10
Additional wells (Well 11 & 12) are planned
for construction in 2028.
Add additional rows as needed
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES:
Submittal Table 8-2 Retail: Supply Augmentation and Other Actions Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(A),(C) and (E)
Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) Shortage
Level
Supply Augmentation Methods and
Other Actions by Water Supplier
Drop down list
These are the only categories that will be
accepted by the WUEdata online submittal tool
How much is this going to reduce the
shortage gap?
Additional Explanation or Reference
(OPTIONAL)
696
Yes
Volume or Percentage
Drop down
Shortage Gap
Reduction Value
(May be a range)
1 Expand Public Information Campaign Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
Initial public outreach campaign to encourage water
conservation. No
1 Landscape – Limit landscape irrigation
to specific times Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
No Lawn/garden watering, or other outdoor use will
be allowed between the hours of 12 noon to 7:00 pm
every day.
Yes
1 Landscape – Limit landscape irrigation
to specific days Volume 24.75 gpcd Three-day watering schedule. Yes 2 CII – Restaurants may only serve water
upon request
Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
Service of water by any restaurant except upon
request of a patron. Yes
2 Other Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
Limit washing of cars and boats to one day per week. Yes 2 Water Features – Restrict water use for
decorative water features, such as
fountains
Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
No use of water to clean, fill, or maintain levels in
decorative fountains. Yes
2 Other water feature or swimming pool
restriction Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
Initial filing of swimming pools or otherwise of the
full capacity of a pool over 2,500 gallons is prohibited.
Emptying and refilling all pools is prohibited.
Yes
2 Other – Customers must repair leaks,
breaks, and malfunctions in a timely
manner
Volume 3-6 gpcd Indoor leaks will be repaired within 7 days of notification by the City. Yes
3 Landscape – Limit landscape irrigation
to specific days Volume 24.75 gpcd Two-day watering schedule. Yes 4 Other – Prohibit use of potable water
for construction and dust control Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
Construction water for soil compaction, backfill, or
dust control shall be from a non-potable source. Yes
4 Other Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
No private washing of cars or boats. Yes
4 Other Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
No water for street cleaning. Yes
4 Other Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
Enact conservation measures as needed to achieve
reductions as mandated. Yes
5 Landscape – Limit landscape irrigation
to specific days Volume 24.75 gpcd One-day watering schedule. Yes 6 Landscape – Prohibit all landscape
irrigation Volume 24.75 gpcd Yes
6 CII – Lodging establishment must offer
opt out of linen service Volume
Supports other
demand reduction
actions
Offers guests in hotels, motels, and other commercial
lodging establishments the option of not laundering
towels and linens daily.
Yes
Submittal Table 8-3 Retail: Demand Reduction Actions
Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(B) and (E)
Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) Shortage
Level
Demand Reduction Actions
Drop down list
These are the only categories that will be
accepted by the WUEdata online submittal
tool. Select those that apply.
How much is this going to reduce the shortage
gap?
Additional Explanation or Reference
(OPTIONAL)
Penalty, Charge, or
Other
Enforcement?
For Retail Suppliers Only
Drop Down List
Add additional rows as needed
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: After a notice of intention to impose a penalty is served, a penalty shall be assessed to the utility account. For the first violation, the consumer shall be issued an administrative citation in the amount of $50. For the second violation, the consumer shall be issued an administrative citation in the amount of $75. For the third violation, the consumer shall be issued an administrative citation in the amount of $100. For the fourth and any subsequent violations, the consumer shall be issued an administrative citation in the amount of $200. The penalty shall be subject to collection in the same manner as any unpaid water service charges. 697
City Name 60 Day Notice
Drop Down (yes/no)
Notice of Public
Hearing
Drop Down (yes/no)
- - -
County Name
Drop Down List
60 Day Notice
Drop Down (yes/no)
Notice of Public
Hearing
Drop Down (yes/no)
Stanislaus County Yes Yes
Submittal Table 10-1 Retail: Notification to Cities and Counties Water Code Section 10621(b) and 10642
Add additional rows as needed
Add additional rows as needed
NOTES: No additional notes.
698
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
B
Appendix B
DWR UWMP Checklist
699
Retail
(x = required)
Wholesale
(x = required) Order 2025 Guidebook Location Water Code Section Summary as Applies to UWMP Subject Relevant Submittal Table 2025 UWMP Location x x 1 Chapter 1 10615 A plan shall describe and evaluate sources of supply, reasonable and practical efficient uses, reclamation and demand management activities. Introduction and overview n/a Section 1.1 Page 1-1 x x 1 Chapter 1 10630.5
Each plan shall include a simple description of the Supplier’s plan including water availability, future requirements, a strategy for meeting needs, and other pertinent information. Additionally, a Supplier may also choose to include a simple description at the beginning of each chapter.
Plan preparation n/a Section 1.6 Page 1-4
x x 2.1 Section 2.1 10620(b) Every person that becomes a Supplier shall adopt UWMP within one year after it has become a Supplier. Plan preparation n/a Section 2.1.1 Page 2-1 x n/a 2.5 Section 2.5 10644 Supplier shall report the Public Water Systems number, volume of delivered water, and number of connections that are included in this UWMP. Plan preparation 2-1 Section 2.1.1 Page 2-1 x x 2.5 Section 2.5 10644 Supplier shall report if this UWMP is an individual UWMP and whether the Supplier belongs to a regional UWMP or regional alliance. Plan preparation 2-2 Section 2.2 Page 2-2 x x 2.5 Section 2.5 10644 Supplier shall report whether the data is in fiscal or calendar years and the units of measure used for reporting water volumes. Plan preparation 2-3 Section 2.3 Page 2-2 x x 2.4 Section 2.4 10642
Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier has encouraged active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the service area prior to and during the preparation of the plan and contingency plan.
Plan preparation n/a Section 2.4 Page 2-3
x x 2.4 Section 2.4.2 10620(d)(3)
Coordinate the preparation of its plan with other appropriate agencies in the area, including other Suppliers that share a common source, water management agencies, and relevant public agencies, to the extent practicable.
Plan preparation n/a Section 2.4 Page 2-3
x n/a 2.4 Section 2.4.1 10631(h) Retail Suppliers will include documentation that they have provided their Wholesale Supplier(s)—if any—with water use projections from that source. Plan preparation 2-4 R Section 2.4.1 Page 2-4 n/a x 2.4 Section 2.4.1 10631(h)
Wholesale Suppliers will provide their Suppliers with identification and quantification of the existing and planned sources of water available from the Wholesale Supplier to the Supplier during various water year types.
Plan preparation 2-4 W N/A
x x 3 Chapter 3.0 10631(a) Describe the Supplier service area. System description n/a Section 3.2 Page 3-2 x x 3.3 Section 3.3 10631(a) Describe the climate of the Supplier’s service area. System description n/a Section 3.3 Page 3-5 x x 3.4 Section 3.4.1 10631(a) Provide the current and projected service area populations for 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045 and optionally 2050. System description 3-1 Section 3.4.1 Page 3-6
x x 3.4 Section 3.4.2 10631(a) Describe other social, economic, and demographic factors affecting the Supplier’s water management planning. System description n/a Section 3.4.2 Page 3-6 x x 3.5 Section 3.5 10631(a)
Describe the land uses within the service area… include the current and projected land uses within the existing or anticipated service area affecting the Supplier’s water management planning. Describe the land uses within the service area.
System description and baselines n/a Section 3.5 Page 3-7 x Optional 4.2 Sections 4.2.3 and 4.2.4 10631(d)(1) Quantify past, current, and projected water use, identifying the uses among water use sectors. System water use 4-1 and 4-2 Section 4.2 Page 4-1 x Optional 4.3 Section 4.3.1 10631(d)(3)(A) Report the distribution system water loss for each of the five years preceding the plan update. System water use 4-5 Section 4.3 Page 4-10 x n/a 4.3 Section 4.3.2 10631(d)(3)(C) Retail Suppliers shall provide data to show the distribution loss standards were met. System water use 4-6 Section 4.4 Page 4-10 x n/a 4.2 Section 4.2.5.4 10631.1(a) Include projected water use needed for lower income housing projected in the service area of the Supplier. System water use 4-3 Section 4.2.6 Page 4-7
x n/a 4.2 Section 4.2.5.3 10631(d)(4)(A) In projected water use, include estimates of water savings from adopted codes, plans, and other policies or laws. System water use 4-3 Section 4.2.6 Page 4-7
x n/a 4.2 Section 4.2.5.3 10631(d)(4)(B) Provide citations of codes, standards, ordinances, or plans used to make water use projections. System water use 4-3 Section 4.2.6 Page 4-7 x n/a 4.2 Section 4.2.5.3 10631(d)(4)(B)(ii)
To the extent that a Supplier reports the information described in subparagraph (A), an urban water Supplier shall… Indicate the extent that the water use projections consider savings from codes, standards, ordinances, or transportation and land use plans. Water use projections that do not account for these water savings shall be noted of that fact.
System water use 4-3 Section 4.2.6 Page 4-7
x x 4.2 Section 4.2.5.6 10635(b) Demands under climate change considerations must be included as part of the drought risk assessment. System water use n/a Section 4.2.7 Page 4-9 n/a x 5.1 Section 5.1 10608.36 Wholesale Suppliers shall include an assessment of present and proposed future measures, programs, and policies to help their Retail Suppliers achieve targeted water use reductions. Baselines and targets n/a N/A x n/a 5.2 Section 5.2 10608.4
Retail Suppliers shall report on their compliance in meeting their water use targets. Reporting requirements will vary depending on whether the Supplier:
- Was considered an urban retail water supplier in 2020, - Met its 2020 target in 2020, or
- Was part of a merger or consolidation since 2020.
Chapter 5 Subsections 5.2.1, 5.2.2, and 5.2.3 address each of these situations.
Baselines and targets 5-1 Section 5.1 Page 5-1
x x 6.1 Section 6.1 10631(b)(2) When multiple sources of water supply are identified, describe the management of each supply in relationship to other identified supplies. System supplies n/a Section 6.1 Page 6-1 x x 6.1 Sections 6.1 and 6.2 10631(b)(1)
Provide a discussion of anticipated supply availability under a normal, single dry year, and a drought lasting five years, as well as more frequent and severe periods of drought, including changes in supply due to climate change.
System supplies n/a Section 6.1.11 Page 6-19
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(C)
Indicate whether groundwater is an existing or planned source of water available to the Supplier. If groundwater is identified as an existing or planned source of water… (include) a detailed description and analysis of the location, amount and sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the Supplier for the past five years.
Water supplies and recycled water 6-1 Section 6.1.2 Page 6-2 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(A)
Indicate whether a groundwater sustainability plan or groundwater management plan has been adopted by the Supplier or if there is any other specific authorization for groundwater management. Include a copy of the plan or authorization.
System supplies n/a Section 6.1.2.1 Page 6-3
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) Describe the groundwater basin. System supplies n/a Section 6.1.2.1 Page 6-3 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) Indicate if the basin has been adjudicated and include a copy of the court order or decree and a description of the amount of water the Supplier has the legal right to pump. System supplies n/a Section 6.1.2.1 Page 6-3 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) For unadjudicated basins… (include) information as to whether DWR has identified the basin as a high- or medium-priority basin in the most current official departmental bulletin… Water supplies and recycled water n/a Section 6.1.2.1 Page 6-3 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(B) For unadjudicated basins… describe efforts by the Supplier to coordinate with sustainability or groundwater agencies to achieve sustainable groundwater conditions. Water supplies and recycled water n/a Section 6.1.2.1 Page 6-3 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2. 10631(b)(4)(C)
If groundwater is identified as an existing or planned source of water… (include) a detailed description and analysis of the location, amount and sufficiency of groundwater pumped by the Supplier for the past five years.
System supplies n/a Section 6.1.2 Page 6-2
700
x x 6.2 Section 6.2.2 10631(b)(4)(D) Provide a detailed description and analysis of the amount and location of groundwater that is projected to be pumped. System supplies 6-9 Section 6.1.10.2 Page 6-17 x x 6.1 Section 6.1 10631(b) Identify and quantify the existing and planned sources of water available for 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045 and optionally 2050. System supplies 6-8 and 6-9 Section 6.1.10.2 Page 6-17 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.7 10631(c) Describe the opportunities for exchanges or transfers of water on a short-term or long-term basis. System supplies n/a Section 6.1.7 Page 6-14 x n/a 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(a) Describe the wastewater collection and treatment systems in the Supplier’s service area with quantified amount of collection and treatment and the disposal methods. System supplies (recycled water) 6-2 Section 6.1.5.2 Page 6-8 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(b) Describe the quantity of treated wastewater that meets recycled water standards, is being discharged, and is otherwise available for use in a recycled water project. System supplies (recycled water) 6-3 Section 6.1.5.2 Page 6-8 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(c) Describe the recycled water currently being used in the Supplier's service area. System supplies (recycled water) 6-4 Section 6.1.5.3 Page 6-11 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(d) Describe and quantify the potential uses of recycled water and provide a determination of the technical and economic feasibility of those uses. System supplies (recycled water) 6-4 Section 6.1.5.4 Page 6-11 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(e) Describe the projected use of recycled water within the Supplier's service area at the end of 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, and describe the actual use of recycled water in comparison to uses previously projected. System supplies (recycled water) 6-4 and 6-5 Section 6.1.5.4 Page 6-11 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(f) Describe the actions that may be taken to encourage the use of recycled water and the projected results of these actions in terms of acre-feet of recycled water used per year. System supplies (recycled water) 6-6 Section 6.1.5.5 Page 6-13 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.5 10633(g) Provide a plan for optimizing the use of recycled water in the Supplier's service area. System supplies (recycled water) n/a Section 6.1.5.5 Page 6-13 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.6 10631(g) Describe desalinated water project opportunities for long-term supply. System supplies 6-7 Section 6.1.6 Page 6-14 x x 6.2 Section 6.2.10 10631(f)
Describe the expected future water supply projects and programs that may be undertaken by the water Supplier to address water supply reliability in average, single-dry, and for a period of drought lasting five consecutive water years.
System supplies 6-7 Section 6.1.9 Page 6-15
x x 6.3 Section 6.3 and Appendix O 10631.2(a) The UWMP must include energy information, as stated in the code, that a Supplier can readily obtain. System suppliers, energy intensity O-1A, O-1B, O-1C, and O-2 Section 6.2 Page 6-19 x 7.1 Section 7.1 10634 Provide information on the quality of existing sources of water available to the Supplier and the manner in which water quality affects water management strategies and supply reliability.
Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.1.3 Page 7-2
x x 7.2 Section 7.2 10635(a)
Service Reliability Assessment: Assess the water supply reliability during normal, dry, and a drought lasting five consecutive water years by comparing the total water supply sources available to the Supplier with the total projected water use over the next 20 years.
Water supply reliability
assessment 7-2, 7-3, and 7-4 Section 7.2 Page 7-2
x x 7.2 Section 7.2.3 10620(f) Describe water management tools and options to maximize resources and minimize the need to import water from other regions.
Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.2.3 Page 7-6
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b) Provide a drought risk assessment as part of information considered in developing the demand management measures and water supply projects.
Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.3 Page 7-7
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(1)
Include a description of the data, methodology, and basis for one or more supply shortage conditions that are necessary to conduct a drought risk assessment for a drought period that lasts five consecutive years.
Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.3.1 Page 7-7
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(2) Include a determination of the reliability of each source of supply under a variety of water shortage conditions.
Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.3.2 Page 7-7
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(3) Include a comparison of the total water supply sources available to the Supplier with the total projected water use for the drought period.
Water supply reliability
assessment 7-5 Section 7.3.3 Page 7-8
x x 7.3 Section 7.3 10635(b)(4)
Include considerations of the historical drought hydrology, plausible changes on projected supplies and demands under climate change conditions, anticipated regulatory changes, and other locally applicable criteria.
Water supply reliability
assessment n/a Section 7.3.3 Page 7-8
x x 8 Chapter 8 10632(a) Provide a water shortage contingency plan (WSCP) with specified elements below. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Appendix H
x x 8 Chapter 8 10632(a)(1) Provide an analysis of water supply reliability (from Guidebook Chapter 7) in the WSCP. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Appendix H Section 2 Page 3
x x 8.2 Section 8.2 10632(a)(2)(A) Provide the written decision-making process and other methods that the Supplier will use each year to determine its water reliability.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 3.1 Page 6
x x 8.2 Section 8.2 10632(a)(2)(B) Provide data and methodology to evaluate the Supplier’s water reliability for the current year and one dry year pursuant to factors in the code.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 3.2 Page 7
x x 8.3 Section 8.3 10632(a)(3)(A)
Define six standard water shortage levels of 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50% shortage, and greater than 50% shortage. These levels shall be based on supply conditions, including percent reductions in supply, changes in groundwater levels, changes in surface elevation, or other conditions. The shortage levels shall also apply to a catastrophic interruption of supply.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 4 Page 10
x x 8.3 Section 8.3 10632(a)(3)(B) Suppliers with an existing WSCP that uses different water shortage levels must cross reference their categories with the six standard categories.
Water shortage contingency
planning 8-1 Appendix H Section 4 Page 10
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(A) Suppliers with WSCPs that align with the defined shortage levels must specify locally appropriate supply augmentation actions.
Water shortage contingency
planning 8-2 Appendix H Section 5.1 Page 12
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(B) Specify locally appropriate demand reduction actions to adequately respond to shortages. Water shortage contingency planning 8-3 Appendix H Section 5.2 Page 14
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(C) Specify locally appropriate operational changes. Water shortage contingency planning 8-2 Appendix H Section 5.3 Page 18
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(D) Specify additional mandatory prohibitions against specific water use practices that are in addition to Statemandated prohibitions are appropriate to local conditions.
Water shortage contingency
planning Table 8-3 Appendix H Section 5.4 Page 18
x x 8.4 Section 8.4 10632(a)(4)(E) Estimate the extent to which the gap between supplies and demand will be reduced by implementation of the action.
Water shortage contingency
planning 8-2 and 8-3 Appendix H Section 5.2 Page 14
x x 8.4 Section 8.4.6 10632.5 The UWMP shall include a seismic risk assessment and mitigation plan. Water shortage contingency plan n/a Appendix H Section 5.6 Page 20 x x 8.5 Section 8.5 10632(a)(5)(A) Suppliers must describe that they will inform customers, the public and others regarding any current or predicted water shortages.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 6 Page 22
x x 8.5 Section 8.5 10632(a)(5)(B),
10632(a)(5)(C)
Suppliers must describe that they will inform customers, the public and others regarding any shortage response actions triggered or anticipated to be triggered and other relevant communications.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 6 Page 22
x n/a 8.6 Section 8.6 10632(a)(6) Retail Supplier must describe how it will ensure compliance with and enforce provisions of the WSCP. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Appendix H Section 7 Page 23
x x 8.7 Section 8.7 10632(a)(7)(A) Describe the legal authority that empowers the Supplier to enforce shortage response actions. Water shortage contingency planning n/a Appendix H Section 8 Page 23
x x 8.7 Section 8.7 10632(a)(7)(B) Provide a statement that the Supplier will declare a water shortage emergency per Water Code Chapter 3. Water Shortage Emergencies .
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 8 Page 23
701
x
x 8.7 Section 8.7 10632(a)(7)(C) Provide a statement that the Supplier will coordinate with any city or county within which it provides water for the possible proclamation of a local emergency.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 8 Page 23
xx 8.8 Section 8.8 10632(a)(8)(A) Describe the potential revenue reductions and expense increases associated with activated shortage response actions.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 9 Page 25
xx 8.8 Section 8.8 10632(a)(8)(B) Provide a description of mitigation actions needed to address revenue reductions and expense increases associated with activated shortage response actions.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 9 Page 25
x n/a 8.8 Section 8.8 10632(a)(8)(C) Retail Suppliers must describe the cost of compliance with Water Code Chapter 3.3, Excessive Residential Water Use During Drought .
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 9 Page 25
x n/a 8.9 Section 8.9 10632(a)(9) Retail Suppliers must describe the monitoring and reporting requirements and procedures that ensure appropriate data are collected, tracked, and analyzed for purposes of monitoring customer compliance.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 10 Page 26
xx 8.10 Section 8.10 10632(a)(10) Describe reevaluation and improvement procedures for monitoring and evaluation the WSCP to ensure risk tolerance is adequate and appropriate water shortage mitigation strategies are implemented.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 10 Page 26
x n/a 8.11 Section 8.11 10632(b) Analyze and define water features that are artificially supplied with water, including ponds, lakes, waterfalls, and fountains, separately from swimming pools and spas.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 11.1 Page 27
xx 8.12 Section 8.12 10632(c) Make available the WSCP to customers and any city or county where it provides water within 30 days after adoption of the plan.
Water shortage contingency
planning n/a Appendix H Section 11.2 Page 27
x n/a 9.1 Sections 9.1 10631(e)(1)
Retail Suppliers shall provide a description of the nature and extent of each demand management measure implemented over the past five years. The description will address specific measures listed in code.
Demand management measures n/a Section 9.1.1 Page 9-1
n/ax 9.2 Sections 9.2 10631(e)(2) Wholesale Suppliers shall describe specific demand management measures listed in code, their distribution system asset management program, and Supplier assistance program. Demand management measures n/a N/A x n/a 10 Chapter 10 10608.26(a) Retail Suppliers shall conduct a public hearing to discuss adoption, implementation, and economic impact of water use targets (recommended to discuss compliance).
Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.4 Page 10-3
xx 10.2 Section 10.2.1 10621(b) Notify, at least 60 days prior to the public hearing, any city or county within which the Supplier provides water that the Supplier will be reviewing the UWMP and considering amendments or changes to the plan.
Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation 10-1 Section 10.3 Page 10-1
xx 10.4 Section 10.4 10621(f) Each urban water Supplier shall update and submit its 2025 plan to DWR by July 1, 202 6. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a Section 10.5.1 Page 10-4
xx 10.2 Sections 10.2.2, 10.3, and 10.5 10642 Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier made the UWMP and WSCP available for public inspection, published notice of the public hearing, and held a public hearing about the UWMP and WSCP.
Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10 Page 10-1
xx 10.2 Section 10.2.2 10642 The Supplier is to provide the time and place of the hearing to any city or county within which the Supplier provides water.
Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation 10-1 Section 10.3 Page 10-1
xx 10.3 Section 10.3.2 10642 Provide supporting documentation that the UWMP and WSCP has been adopted as prepared or modified. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a Section 10.4.2 Page 10-3
xx 10.4 Section 10.4 10644(a) Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier has submitted their UWMP to the California State Library.
Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.5.3 Page 10-4
xx 10.4 Section 10.4 10644(a)(1) Provide supporting documentation that the Supplier has submitted their UWMP to any city or county within which the Supplier provides water no later than 30 days after adoption.
Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.5.4 Page 10-4
xx 10.4 Sections 10.4.1 and 10.4.2 10644(a)(2) The UWMP, or amendments to the UWMP, submitted to DWR shall be submitted electronically. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a Section 10.9.1 Page 10-5
xx 10.7 Section 10.7.2 10644(b) If revised, submit a copy of the WSCP to DWR within 30 days of adoption. Plan adoption, submittal, and implementation n/a Section 10.9.1 Page 10-5
xx 10.5 Section 10.5 10645(a) Provide supporting documentation that, not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its UWMP with DWR, the Supplier has or will make the plan available for public review during normal business hours.
Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.6 Page 10-4
xx 10.5 Section 10.5 10645(b) Provide supporting documentation that, not later than 30 days after filing a copy of its WSCP with DWR, the Supplier has or will make the plan available for public review during normal business hours.
Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.6 Page 10-4
xx 10.6 Section 10.6 10621(c) If Supplier is regulated by the Public Utilities Commission, include its plan and contingency plan as part of its general rate case filings.
Plan adoption, submittal, and
implementation n/a Section 10.7 Page 10-5
702
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
C
Appendix C
Agency and Public Notices
703
CITY OF OAKDALE PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
455 S. Fifth Avenue • Oakdale, California 95361
Phone: 209.845.3625 • Fax: 209.848.4344
www.oakdalegov.com/public-services
April 15, 2026
SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation for the 2025 City of Oakdale Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP)
To Whom It May Concern,
The Urban Water Management Planning Act, California Water Code (CWC) § 10610 et seq., requires every urban water supplier providing water for municipal purposes, either directly or indirectly, to more than 3,000 customers or supplying more than 3,000 acrefeet of water annually to prepare and adopt an Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and update that plan every five years. The UWMP is a planning document to support long-term resource planning and ensure adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future water demands.
Pursuant to the requirements of the CWC, Division 6, Part 2.6 Urban Water Management Planning, Section 10621 (b), every urban water supplier required to prepare an UWMP shall, at least 60 days before the public hearing on the plan required by Section 10642, notify any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies that the urban water supplier will be reviewing the plan and considering amendments or changes to the plan.
Per CWC Section 10642, prior to adopting such plan(s), the urban water supplier shall make the UWMP and Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) available for public inspection within the jurisdiction of the water supplier. In addition, the urban water supplier shall provide notice of the time and place of a hearing to any city or county within which the supplier provides water supplies.
This letter is intended to notify your agency that the City of Oakdale (City) is currently in the process of preparing the 2025 UWMP and WSCP. The City’s public hearing for the 2025 UWMP and WSCP is scheduled for June 15, 2026. Comments can be submitted prior or during the public hearing.
For further information on the public hearing or the UWMP and WSCP update, refer to the city’s website, https://www.oakdalegov.com/, or please contact us at (209) 845-3600.
Sincerely,
Jeff Gravel
Jeff Gravel
Public Services Director
704
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
D
Appendix D
Water Loss Audits
(2020-2024)
705
Water Audit Report for:
Reporting Year:
All volumes to be entered as: MILLION GALLONS (US) PER YEAR Master Meter and Supply Error Adjustments
WATER SUPPLIED Pcnt: Value:
Volume from own sources: 5 1,699.790 MG/Yr 3 MG/Yr
Water imported: n/a 0.000 MG/Yr MG/Yr
Water exported: n/a 0.000 MG/Yr MG/Yr
Enter negative % or value for under-registration
WATER SUPPLIED: 1,671.910 MG/Yr Enter positive % or value for over-registration .
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
Billed metered: 5 1,500.370 MG/Yr
Billed unmetered: n/a 0.000 MG/Yr
Unbilled metered: 9 67.840 MG/Yr Pcnt: Value:
Unbilled unmetered: 5 4.180 MG/Yr 1.25% 24061 MG/Yr
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION: 1,572.390 MG/Yr
WATER LOSSES (Water Supplied - Authorized Consumption) 99.520 MG/Yr Apparent Losses Pcnt: Value:
Unauthorized consumption: 4.180 MG/Yr 0.25% MG/Yr
Customer metering inaccuracies: 3 15.841 MG/Yr 1.00% MG/Yr Systematic data handling errors: 5 3.751 MG/Yr 0.25% MG/Yr Apparent Losses: 23.771 MG/Yr
Real Losses (Current Annual Real Losses or CARL)
Real Losses = Water Losses - Apparent Losses: 75.749 MG/Yr WATER LOSSES: 99.520 MG/Yr
NON-REVENUE WATER
NON-REVENUE WATER: 171.540 MG/Yr
= Water Losses + Unbilled Metered + Unbilled Unmetered
SYSTEM DATA
Length of mains: 5 75.0 miles
Number of active AND inactive service connections: 8 8,297 Service connection density: 111 conn./mile main
Yes
Average length of customer service line: ft
Average operating pressure: 5 51.0 psi
COST DATA
Total annual cost of operating water system: 10 $5,278,988 $/Year Customer retail unit cost (applied to Apparent Losses): 9 $2.07 Variable production cost (applied to Real Losses): 5 $286.14 $/Million gallons WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY SCORE:
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION:
1: Volume from own sources
2: Customer metering inaccuracies
3: Billed metered
Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop or property line? Based on the information provided, audit accuracy can be improved by addressing the following components:
$/100 cubic feet (ccf)
Default option selected for unauthorized consumption - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed *** YOUR SCORE IS: 59 out of 100 ***
A weighted scale for the components of consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score Default option selected for Systematic data handling errors - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading score of 10 has been applied AWWA Free Water Audit Software:
Reporting Worksheet
4.180
2020 1/2020 - 12/2020
City of Oakdale (CA5010014)
<----------- Enter grading in column 'E' and 'J' ---------->
27.880
?
?
?
?
?
? Click to access definition
?
?
?
?
?
?
Please enter data in the white cells below. Where available, metered values should be used; if metered values are unavailable please estimate a value. Indicate your confidence in the accuracy of the input data by grading each component (n/a or 1-10) using the drop-down list to the left of the input cell. Hover the mouse over the cell to obtain a description of the grades ?
?
?
?
?
?
(length of service line, beyond the property boundary,
that is the responsibility of the utility)
Use buttons to select
percentage of water supplied
OR
value
Click here: ?
for help using option
buttons below
?
?
?
?
+
+ Click to add a comment
WAS v5.0
+
+
+
+
+
+
American Water Works Association.
Copyright © 2014, All Rights Reserved.
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Use Customer Retail Unit Cost to value real losses
?
To select the correct data grading for each input, determine the highest grade where the utility meets or exceeds all criteria for that grade and all grades below it.
AWWA Free Water Audit Software v5.0 Reporting Worksheet 1 706
Water Audit Report for:
Reporting Year:
All volumes to be entered as: MILLION GALLONS (US) PER YEAR Master Meter and Supply Error Adjustments
WATER SUPPLIED Pcnt: Value:
Volume from own sources: 7 1,695.450 MG/Yr 3 MG/Yr
Water imported: n/a 0.000 MG/Yr MG/Yr
Water exported: n/a 0.000 MG/Yr MG/Yr
Enter negative % or value for under-registration
WATER SUPPLIED: 1,696.530 MG/Yr Enter positive % or value for over-registration .
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
Billed metered: 5 1,503.558 MG/Yr
Billed unmetered: n/a 0.000 MG/Yr
Unbilled metered: 9 65.154 MG/Yr Pcnt: Value:
Unbilled unmetered: 5 21.207 MG/Yr 1.25% 24061 MG/Yr
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION: 1,589.919 MG/Yr
WATER LOSSES (Water Supplied - Authorized Consumption) 106.611 MG/Yr Apparent Losses Pcnt: Value:
Unauthorized consumption: 4.241 MG/Yr 0.25% MG/Yr
Customer metering inaccuracies: 3 15.846 MG/Yr 1.00% MG/Yr Systematic data handling errors: 5 3.759 MG/Yr 0.25% MG/Yr Apparent Losses: 23.846 MG/Yr
Real Losses (Current Annual Real Losses or CARL)
Real Losses = Water Losses - Apparent Losses: 82.765 MG/Yr WATER LOSSES: 106.611 MG/Yr
NON-REVENUE WATER
NON-REVENUE WATER: 192.972 MG/Yr
= Water Losses + Unbilled Metered + Unbilled Unmetered
SYSTEM DATA
Length of mains: 6 75.0 miles
Number of active AND inactive service connections: 8 8,297 Service connection density: 111 conn./mile main
Yes
Average length of customer service line: ft
Average operating pressure: 5 51.0 psi
COST DATA
Total annual cost of operating water system: 10 $4,784,465 $/Year Customer retail unit cost (applied to Apparent Losses): 9 $2.07 Variable production cost (applied to Real Losses): 5 $334.23 $/Million gallons WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY SCORE:
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION:
1: Volume from own sources
2: Customer metering inaccuracies
3: Billed metered
Based on the information provided, audit accuracy can be improved by addressing the following components:
$/100 cubic feet (ccf)
Default option selected for unauthorized consumption - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed *** YOUR SCORE IS: 67 out of 100 ***
A weighted scale for the components of consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score Default option selected for Systematic data handling errors - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading score of 10 has been applied Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop or property line? AWWA Free Water Audit Software:
Reporting Worksheet
Default option selected for Unbilled unmetered - a grading of 5 is applied but not displayed 2021 1/2021 - 12/2021
City of Oakdale (CA5010014)
<----------- Enter grading in column 'E' and 'J' ----------> -1.080
?
?
?
?
?
? Click to access definition
?
?
?
?
?
?
Please enter data in the white cells below. Where available, metered values should be used; if metered values are unavailable please estimate a value. Indicate your confidence in the accuracy of the input ?
?
?
?
?
?
(length of service line, beyond the property boundary,
that is the responsibility of the utility)
Use buttons to select
percentage of water supplied
OR
value
Click here: ?
for help using option
?
?
?
?
+
+ Click to add a comment
WAS v5.0
+
+
+
+
+
+
American Water Works Association.
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Use Customer Retail Unit Cost to value real losses
?
To select the correct data grading for each input, determine the highest grade where the utility meets or exceeds all criteria for that grade and all grades below it.
AWWA Free Water Audit Software v5.0 Reporting Worksheet 1 707
Water Audit Report for:
Audit Year:
All volumes to be entered as: MILLION GALLONS (US) PER YEAR WATER SUPPLIED choose entry option:
VOS Volume from Own Sources: n g 4 1,649.590 MG/Yr n g 8 0.36% percent MG/Yr under-registration VOSEA WI Water Imported: n g 0.000 MG/Yr n g percent MG/Yr select….. WIEA WE Water Exported: n g 0.000 MG/Yr n g percent MG/Yr select….. WEEA 1,655.550 MG/Yr
.
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
BMAC Billed Metered: n g 8 1,483.972 MG/Yr
BUAC Billed Unmetered: n g MG/Yr
UMAC Unbilled Metered: n g 10 66.733 MG/Yr choose entry option:
UUAC Unbilled Unmetered: n g 3 3.710 MG/Yr 0.25% default MG/Yr 24061 Default option selected for Unbilled Unmetered, with automatic data grading of 3 1,554.415 MG/Yr
WATER LOSSES 101.135 MG/Yr
Apparent Losses
Default option selected for Systematic Data Handling Errors, with automatic data grading of 3 choose entry option:
SDHE Systematic Data Handling Errors: n g 3 3.710 MG/Yr 0.25% default MG/Yr CMI Customer Metering Inaccuracies: n g 2 15.664 MG/Yr 1.00% percent MG/Yr under-registration UC Unauthorized Consumption: n g 3 3.710 MG/Yr 0.25% default MG/Yr Default option selected for Unauthorized Consumption, with automatic data grading of 3
23.084 MG/Yr
Real Losses
78.052 MG/Yr
101.135 MG/Yr
NON-REVENUE WATER
171.578 MG/Yr
SYSTEM DATA
Lm Length of mains: n g 6 75.0 miles (including fire hydrant lead lengths) Nc Number of service connections: n g 6 8,291 (active and inactive) Service connection density: 111 conn./mile main
Yes
Lp Average length of (private) customer service line: n g 10 ft (average distance between property line and meter) AOP Average Operating Pressure: n g 7 57.0 psi
COST DATA
CRUC Customer Retail Unit Charge: n g 10 $2.15
VPC Variable Production Cost: n g 9 $404.33 $/Million gallons $/yr (optional input) WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY TIER:
go to
dashboard
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION TO IMPROVE DATA VALIDITY: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR TARGETS:
Based on the information provided, audit reliability can be most improved by addressing the following components: OPTIONAL: If targets exist for the operational performance indicators, they can be input below:
1: Volume from Own Sources (VOS) Unit Total Losses: gal/conn/day 2: Customer Metering Inaccuracies (CMI) Unit Apparent Losses: gal/conn/day 3: Billed Metered (BMAC) Unit Real LossesA
: gal/conn/day
Unit Real LossesB: gal/mile/day
If entered above by user, targets will display on KPI gauges (see Dashboard) go to start page
NON-REVENUE WATER:
If entering an
Error Adjustment,
select under- or overregistration
WATER SUPPLIED:
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION:
Apparent Losses:
Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading of 10 has been applied A weighted scale for the components of supply, consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score *** The Water Audit Data Validity Score is in Tier III (51-70). See Dashboard tab for additional outputs. *** $/100 cubic feet (ccf)
$4,079,763
Total Annual Operating Cost
Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop/property line? AWWA Free Water Audit Software:
Worksheet
City of Oakdale
Jan 01 2022 - Dec 31 2022
Water Supplied Error Adjustments
2022 Calendar
Real Losses:
WATER LOSSES:
Click 'g' to determine data validity grade
Click 'n' to add notes
FWAS v6.0
American Water Works Association.
To access definitions, click the input name
To edit water system info:
AWWA Free Water Audit Software v6.0 Worksheet 1
708
Water Audit Report for:
Audit Year:
All volumes to be entered as: MILLION GALLONS (US) PER YEAR WATER SUPPLIED choose entry option:
VOS Volume from Own Sources: n g 6 1,570.490 MG/Yr n g 8 0.11% volume MG/Yr over-registration VOSEA WI Water Imported: n g MG/Yr n g percent MG/Yr select….. WIEA WE Water Exported: n g MG/Yr n g percent MG/Yr select….. WEEA 1,568.789 MG/Yr
.
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
BMAC Billed Metered: n g 8 1,372.418 MG/Yr
BUAC Billed Unmetered: n g MG/Yr
UMAC Unbilled Metered: n g 10 59.508 MG/Yr choose entry option:
UUAC Unbilled Unmetered: n g 3 3.431 MG/Yr 0.25% default MG/Yr 24061 Default option selected for Unbilled Unmetered, with automatic data grading of 3 1,435.357 MG/Yr
WATER LOSSES 133.432 MG/Yr
Apparent Losses
Default option selected for Systematic Data Handling Errors, with automatic data grading of 3 choose entry option:
SDHE Systematic Data Handling Errors: n g 3 3.431 MG/Yr 0.25% default MG/Yr CMI Customer Metering Inaccuracies: n g 2 14.464 MG/Yr 1.00% percent MG/Yr under-registration UC Unauthorized Consumption: n g 3 3.431 MG/Yr 0.25% default MG/Yr Default option selected for Unauthorized Consumption, with automatic data grading of 3
21.326 MG/Yr
Real Losses
112.106 MG/Yr
133.432 MG/Yr
NON-REVENUE WATER
196.371 MG/Yr
SYSTEM DATA
Lm Length of mains: n g 6 75.0 miles (including fire hydrant lead lengths) Nc Number of service connections: n g 8 8,318 (active and inactive) Service connection density: 111 conn./mile main
Yes
Lp Average length of (private) customer service line: n g 10 ft (average distance between property line and meter) AOP Average Operating Pressure: n g 7 57.0 psi
COST DATA
CRUC Customer Retail Unit Charge: n g 10 $2.15
VPC Variable Production Cost: n g 9 $280.32 $/Million gallons $/yr (optional input) WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY TIER:
go to
dashboard
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION TO IMPROVE DATA VALIDITY: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR TARGETS:
Based on the information provided, audit reliability can be most improved by addressing the following components: OPTIONAL: If targets exist for the operational performance indicators, they can be input below:
1: Volume from Own Sources (VOS) Unit Total Losses: gal/conn/day 2: Customer Metering Inaccuracies (CMI) Unit Apparent Losses: gal/conn/day 3: Billed Metered (BMAC) Unit Real LossesA
: gal/conn/day
Unit Real LossesB: gal/mile/day
If entered above by user, targets will display on KPI gauges (see Dashboard) go to start page
NON-REVENUE WATER:
If entering an
Error Adjustment,
select under- or overregistration
WATER SUPPLIED:
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION:
Apparent Losses:
Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading of 10 has been applied A weighted scale for the components of supply, consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score *** The Water Audit Data Validity Score is in Tier III (51-70). See Dashboard tab for additional outputs. *** $/100 cubic feet (ccf)
$3,714,905
Total Annual Operating Cost
Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop/property line? AWWA Free Water Audit Software:
Worksheet
City of Oakdale
1.701
Jan 01 2023 - Dec 31 2023
Water Supplied Error Adjustments
2023 Calendar
Real Losses:
WATER LOSSES:
Click 'g' to determine data validity grade
Click 'n' to add notes
FWAS v6.0
American Water Works Association.
To access definitions, click the input name
To edit water system info:
AWWA Free Water Audit Software v6.0 Worksheet 1
709
Water Audit Report for:
Audit Year:
All volumes to be entered as: MILLION GALLONS (US) PER YEAR WATER SUPPLIED choose entry option:
VOS Volume from Own Sources: n g 6 1,652.150 MG/Yr n g 8 volume MG/Yr under-registration VOSEA WI Water Imported: n g n/a MG/Yr n g n/a percent MG/Yr WIEA WE Water Exported: n g n/a MG/Yr n g n/a percent MG/Yr WEEA 1,656.648 MG/Yr
.
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION
BMAC Billed Metered: n g 8 1,446.834 MG/Yr
BUAC Billed Unmetered: n g n/a MG/Yr
UMAC Unbilled Metered: n g 10 77.765 MG/Yr choose entry option:
UUAC Unbilled Unmetered: n g 3 3.617 MG/Yr 0.25% default MG/Yr 24061 Default option selected for Unbilled Unmetered, with automatic data grading of 3 1,528.216 MG/Yr
WATER LOSSES 128.432 MG/Yr
Apparent Losses
Default option selected for Systematic Data Handling Errors, with automatic data grading of 3 choose entry option:
SDHE Systematic Data Handling Errors: n g 3 3.617 MG/Yr 0.25% default MG/Yr CMI Customer Metering Inaccuracies: n g 2 15.400 MG/Yr 1.00% percent MG/Yr under-registration UC Unauthorized Consumption: n g 3 3.617 MG/Yr 0.25% default MG/Yr Default option selected for Unauthorized Consumption, with automatic data grading of 3
22.634 MG/Yr
Real Losses
105.798 MG/Yr
128.432 MG/Yr
NON-REVENUE WATER
209.814 MG/Yr
SYSTEM DATA
Lm Length of mains: n g 6 77.0 miles (including fire hydrant lead lengths) Nc Number of service connections: n g 8 8,320 (active and inactive) Service connection density: 108 conn./mile main
Yes
Lp Average length of (private) customer service line: n g 10 ft (average distance between property line and meter) AOP Average Operating Pressure: n g 7 57.0 psi
COST DATA
CRUC Customer Retail Unit Charge: n g 10 $2.15
VPC Variable Production Cost: n g 9 $525.90 $/Million gallons $/yr (optional input) carbon
WATER AUDIT DATA VALIDITY TIER:
go to
dashboard
PRIORITY AREAS FOR ATTENTION TO IMPROVE DATA VALIDITY: KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR TARGETS:
Based on the information provided, audit reliability can be most improved by addressing the following components: OPTIONAL: If targets exist for the operational performance indicators, they can be input below:
1: Volume from Own Sources (VOS) Unit Total Losses: gal/conn/day 2: Customer Metering Inaccuracies (CMI) Unit Apparent Losses: gal/conn/day 3: Billed Metered (BMAC) Unit Real LossesA
: gal/conn/day
Unit Real LossesB: gal/mile/day
If entered above by user, targets will display on KPI gauges (see Dashboard) go to start page
NON-REVENUE WATER:
If entering an
Error Adjustment,
select under- or overregistration
WATER SUPPLIED:
AUTHORIZED CONSUMPTION:
Apparent Losses:
Average length of customer service line has been set to zero and a data grading of 10 has been applied A weighted scale for the components of supply, consumption and water loss is included in the calculation of the Water Audit Data Validity Score *** The Water Audit Data Validity Score is in Tier III (51-70). See Dashboard tab for additional outputs. *** $/100 cubic feet (ccf)
$4,248,060
Total Annual Operating Cost
Click here to calculate carbon emissions --->
Are customer meters typically located at the curbstop/property line? AWWA Free Water Audit Software:
Worksheet
City of Oakdale
4.498
Jan 01 2024 - Dec 31 2024
Water Supplied Error Adjustments
2024 Calendar
Real Losses:
WATER LOSSES:
Click 'g' to determine data validity grade
Click 'n' to add notes
FWAS v6.1
American Water Works Association.
To access definitions, click the input name
To edit water system info:
AWWA Free Water Audit Software v6.0 Worksheet 1
710
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
E
Appendix E
SB X7-7 Compliance Form
711
SB X7-7 Table 0: Units of Measure Used in UWMP
Water Code Section 10608.20 (e) and 10608.20(h)(1)(2)
(select one from the drop down list)
Acre Feet
The unit of measure must be consistent throughout the UWMP, as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: No additional notes.
712
NOTES: No additional notes.
SB X7-7 Table 2: Method for Population Estimate
Water Code Section 10608.20 (e) and 10608.20(h)(1)(2)
Method Used to Determine 2025 Population
(may check more than one)
1. Department of Finance (DOF) or
American Community Survey (ACS)
4. Other
DWR recommends pre-review
2. Persons-per-Connection Method
3. DWR Population Tool
713
2025 23,132
SB X7-7 Table 3: Service Area Population
Water Code Section 10608.20 (e) and
10608.20(h)(1)(2)
2025 Compliance Year Population
NOTES: No additional notes.
714
Exported
Water
Change in
Dist. System
Storage
(+/-)
Indirect
Recycled
Water
This column will
remain blank
until SB X7-7
Table 4-B is
completed.
Water
Delivered
for
Agricultural
Use
Process Water
This column will
remain blank
until SB X7-7
Table 4-D is
completed.
4,779 - - 4,779
NOTES: No additional notes.
SB X7-7 Table 4: Gross Water Use
Water Code Section 10608.20 (e) and 10608.20(h)(1)(2)
2025 Volume
Into
Distribution
System
This column will
remain blank until
SB X7-7 Table 4-A is
completed.
2025 Gross
Water Use
2025 Deductions
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, MG , or CCF) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP, as reported in SB X7-7 Table 0 and Submittal Table 2-3.
Compliance
Year 2025
715
Volume Entering
Distribution System
Meter Error
Adjustment
Optional
(+/-)
Corrected Volume
Entering
Distribution System
4,779 - 4,779
Volume Entering
Distribution System
Meter Error
Adjustment
Optional
(+/-)
Corrected Volume
Entering
Distribution System
0 This water source is (check one):
The supplier's own water source
SB X7-7 Table 4-A: Volume Entering the Distribution System(s), Meter Error Adjustment
Water Code Section 10608.20 (e) and 10608.20(h)(1)(2)
Complete one table for each source.
Name of Source Enter Name of Source 2
Name of Source
SB X7-7 Table 4-A: 2025 Volume Entering the Distribution System(s), Meter Error Adjustment
Water Code Section 10608.20 (e) and 10608.20(h)(1)(2)
Complete one table for each source.
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, MG , or CCF) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP, as reported in SB X7-7 Table 0 and Submittal Table 2-3.
Meter Error Adjustment - See guidance in Methodology 1, Step 3 of Methodologies Document
NOTES: No additional notes.
This water source is (check one):
The supplier's own water source
A purchased or imported source
Groundwater
Compliance Year
2025
A purchased or imported source
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, MG , or CCF) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP, as reported in SB X7-7 Table 0 and Submittal Table 2-3.
Meter Error Adjustment - See guidance in Methodology 1, Step 3 of Methodologies Document
Compliance Year
2025
716
Volume
Discharged
from
Reservoir for
Distribution
System
Delivery
Percent
Recycled
Water
Recycled
Water
Delivered to
Treatment
Plant
Transmission/
Treatment Loss
Recycled
Volume Entering
Distribution
System from
Surface
Reservoir
Augmentation
Volume Pumped
from
Groundwater for
Distribution
System Delivery
Percent
Recycled Water
Recycled Water
Delivered to
Treatment
Plant
Transmission/
Treatment Loss
Recycled
Volume
Entering
Distribution
System from
Ground Water
Recharge
- - - - -
NOTES: City not deducting indirect recycled water.
2025 Groundwater Recharge
DWR NOTES:
Units of measure (AF, MG , or CCF) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP, as reported in SB X7-7 Table 0 and Submittal Table 2-3.
Suppliers will provide documentation to support the percentage of recycled water reported in this table.
SB X7-7 Table 4-B: Indirect Recycled Water Use Deduction (For use only by agencies that are deducting indirect recycled water) Water Code Section 10608.20 (e) and 10608.20(h)(1)(2)
2025 Compliance
Year
Total Deductible
Volume of Indirect
Recycled Water
Entering the
Distribution System
2025 Surface Reservoir Augmentation
717
Criteria 1- Industrial water use is equal to or greater than 12% of gross water use.
Complete SB X7-7 Table 4-C.1
Criteria 2 - Industrial water use is equal to or greater than 15 GPCD.
Complete SB X7-7 Table 4-C.2
Criteria 3 - Non-industrial use is equal to or less than 120 GPCD.
Complete SB X7-7 Table 4-C.3
Criteria 4 - Disadvantaged Community.
Complete SB X7-7 Table 4-C.4
SB X7-7 Table 4-C: Process Water Deduction Eligibility
Water Code Section 10608.20(i) and Title 23 Section 596 (For use only by agencies that are deducting process water) Choose Only One NOTES: Not eligible for exclusion
718
2025 Gross Water
Use Without
Process Water
Deduction
2025 Industrial
Water Use
Percent
Industrial
Water
Eligible for
Exclusion
Y/N
4,779 2% NO 96
NOTES: No additional notes.
SB X7-7 Table 4-C.1: Process Water Deduction Eligibility Water Code Section 10608.20(i) and Title 23 Section 596 (For use only by agencies that are deducting process water using Criteria 1) Criteria 1
Industrial water use is equal to or greater than 12% of gross water use 2025 Compliance Year
719
2025 Industrial
Water Use
2025 Population
2025
Industrial
GPCD
Eligible for
Exclusion Y/N
23,132 4 NO 96
NOTES:
SB X7-7 Table 4-C.2: Process Water Deduction Eligibility Water Code Section 10608.20(i) and Title 23 Section 596 (For use only by agencies that are deducting process water using Criteria 2) Criteria 2
Industrial water use is equal to or greater than 15 GPCD 2025 Compliance
Year
720
2025 Gross Water Use
Without Process Water
Deduction
(Fm SB X7-7 Table 4)
2025
Industrial
Water Use
2025 Nonindustrial
Water Use
2025
Population
Fm SB X7-7
Table 3
NonIndustrial
GPCD
Eligible for
Exclusion
Y/N
4,779 96 4,683 23,132 181 NO
NOTES:
Criteria 3
Non-industrial use is equal to or less than 120 GPCD
SB X7-7 Table 4-C.3: Process Water Deduction Eligibility Water Code Section 10608.20(i) and Title 23 Section 596 (For use only by agencies that are deducting process water using Criteria 3) 2025 Compliance
Year
721
Service Area Median
Household Income
Percentage of
Statewide
Average
Eligible for
Exclusion? Y/N
$83,091 83% NO
NOTES
California Median
Household Income
DWR NOTES: California median household income for 2024 as reported in US Census Bureau.
SB X7-7 Table 4-C.4: Process Water Deduction Eligibility Water Code Section 10608.20(i) and Title 23 Section 596 (For use only by agencies that are deducting process water using Criteria 4) Criteria 4
Disadvantaged Community. A “Disadvantaged Community” (DAC) is a community with a median household income less than 80 percent of the statewide average.
SELECT ONE
"Disadvantaged Community" status was determined using one of the methods listed below:
If using the IRWM DAC Mapping Tool, include a screen shot from the tool showing that the service area is considered a DAC.
1. IRWM DAC Mapping tool https://gis.water.ca.gov/app/dacs/
2. California Median Income
$100,149
722
2025 Gross Water
Fm SB X7-7 Table 4
2025 Population Fm
SB X7-7 Table 3 2025 GPCD
4,779 23,132 184
SB X7-7 Table 5: Gallons Per Capita Per Day (GPCD)
Water Code Section 10608.20 (e) and 10608.20 (h)(1)(2)
NOTES: No additional notes.
723
Extraordinary
Events
(GPCD)
Weather
Normalization
(GPCD)
Economic
Adjustment
(GPCD)
184 - - - 184.4378456 180 NO
NOTES: No additional notes.
DWR NOTES: All values are reported in GPCD
Suppliers that had a merger or consolidation since 2020 may use a population weighted average 2020 target. See Section P.1.2.1 of Appendix P.
SB X7-7 Table 9: 2025 Compliance
Water Code Section 10608.24(d)
Optional Adjustments to 2025 GPCD
Did Supplier
Achieve
Targeted
Reduction for
2025?
Actual 2025
GPCD
TOTAL 2020 Target
Adjustments
Adjusted 2025
GPCD (Adjusted
if applicable)
Enter "0" if Adjustment Not Used
724
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
F
Appendix F
Energy Use Tables
725
Water Delivery Product
drop down list
(If delivering more than one type of product recommend using Table O-1C)
Retail Potable
Deliveries
Start Date of Reporting Period 1/1/2025
End Date of Reporting Period 12/31/2025
Is upstream embedded energy in the values reported? No
Units of Measure for Water AF
Total Utility
See DWR NOTES
Hydropower Net Utility
4,779 - 4,779
1,579,927 - 1,579,927
1,015 - 1,015
Quantity of Self-Generated Renewable Energy
0 kWh
Data Quality (Estimate, Metered Data, Combination of Estimates and Metered Data) Metered Data
Data Quality Narrative:
Narrative:
(1) An estimate of the amount of energy used to extract or divert water supplies. 10631.2. (a) In addition to the requirements of Section 10631, an urban water management plan shall include any of the following information that the urban water supplier can readily obtain:
Optional Submittal Table O-1B: Recommended Energy Reporting - SINGLE DELIVERY PRODUCT - TOTAL UTILITY APPROACH Only for Water Delivery Products Under the Urban Water Supplier's Operational Control Sum of All Water Management
Processes
Non-Consequential Hydropower
Volume of Water Entering Process
Energy Consumed (kWh)
Energy Intensity (kWh/vol. converted to MG)
DWR NOTES:
Total Utility:The volume of water entered in the “Total Utility” column should equal the volume of water entering the distribution system (excluding recycled water); in most cases, this is the total volume calculated in UWMP Table 4-1: 2025 Actual Total Uses for Potable and Non-Potable Water. Note if recycled water is included in your Submittal Table 4-1, you must exclude it from your volume in this table.
The volume of water is the total amount of groundwater pumped in 2025. The total amount of energy used in 2025 was provided by the City.
Energy is consumed during well pumping.
NOTES: No additional notes.
10631.2 (b) The Department shall include in its guidance for the preparation of urban water management plans a methodology for the voluntary calculation or estimation of the energy intensity of urban water systems.
(2) An estimate of the amount of energy used to convey water supplies to the water treatment plants or distribution systems. (3) An estimate of the amount of energy used to treat water supplies. (4) An estimate of the amount of energy used to distribute water supplies though its distribution systems. (5) An estimate of the amount of energy used for treated water supplies in comparison to the amount used for nontreated water supplies. (6) An estimate of the amount of energy used to place water into or withdraw from storage. (7) Any other energy-related information the urban water supplier deems appropriate. 726
Start Date of Reporting Period 1/1/2025
End Date of Reporting Period 12/31/2025
Is upstream embedded energy in the values reported? No
Units of Measure for Water AF Collection /
Conveyance
Treatment
Discharge /
Distribution Total
1,893 1,893 0 3,786
39439 1,315,247 0 1,354,686
64 2,132 0 1,098
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Quantity of Self-Generated Renewable Energy related to recycled water and wastewater operations
0 kWh
Data Quality (drop down)
Metered Data
Data Quality Narrative:
Narrative:
NOTES: No additional notes.
Wastewater Energy Intensity (kWh/volume converted to MG) Volume of Wastewater Entering Process (volume units selected above) Wastewater Energy Consumed (kWh)
Volume of Recycled Water Entering Process (volume units selected above) Recycled Water Energy Consumed (kWh)
Recycled Water Energy Intensity (kWh/volume converted to MG) Optional Submittal Table O-2: Recommended Energy Reporting - WASTEWATER AND RECYCLED WATER Only for Water Delivery Products Under the Urban Water
Supplier's Operational Control
Water Management Process
The volume of wastewater and the total amount of energy used in 2025 was provided by the City.
Energy is consumed during pumping and treatment as the wastewater treatment plant. 727
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
G
Appendix G
Consumer Confidence Reports
(2021-2024)
728
729
730
731
732
Reporting Year 2022
Presented By
City of Oakdale
Este informe contiene información muy importante sobre su agua potable. Tradúzcalo o hable con alguien que lo entienda bien. PWS ID#: CA5010014 733
Our Mission Continues
We are once again pleased to present our annual water quality report covering all testing performed between January 1 and December 31, 2022. Over the years, we have dedicated ourselves to producing drinking water that meets all state and federal standards. We continually strive to adopt new methods for delivering the best-quality drinking water to you. As new challenges to drinking water safety emerge, we remain vigilant in meeting the goals of source water protection, water conservation, and community education while continuing to serve the needs of all our water users. Please remember that we are always available should you ever have any questions or concerns about your water.
Important Health Information
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immunocompromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who
have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/
AIDS or other immune system disorders, some
elderly, and infants may be particularly at risk from
infections. These people should seek advice about
drinking water from their health care providers. The
U.S. EPA/CDC (Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention) guidelines on appropriate means to lessen
the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium
and other microbial contaminants are
available from the Safe
Drinking Water Hotline
at (800) 426-4791 or
http://water.epa.gov/
drink/hotline.
Level 1 Assessment Update
Coliforms are bacteria that are naturally present in the environment and used as an indicator that other, potentially harmful, waterborne pathogens may be present or that a potential pathway exists through which contamination
may enter the drinking water distribution system. We found coliforms, indicating the need to look for potential problems in water treatment or distribution. When this occurs, we are required to conduct assessments to identify and correct any problems.
During the past year, we were required to conduct one Level 1 assessment. One Level 1 assessment was completed. We were not required to take any corrective actions.
Source Water Assessment
A source water assessment was conducted for the wells of the City of Oakdale water system in February 2001.
The sources are considered most vulnerable to the following activities: sewer collection systems (sewer lines), dry cleaners, historic waste dumps, landfills, injection wells, gas stations, plastics and synthetics producers, and septic systems. For more information regarding the assessment summary, contact City of Oakdale Public Works at (209) 845-3600 or a copy can be viewed at the Department Of Health Services Office Of Drinking Water, 31 East Channel Street, Room 270 Stockton, CA 95202.
Questions? For more information about this
report, or for any questions relating to your drinking water, please call the City of Oakdale at (209) 845-3600 or
Superintendent Jeff Roberts (209) 845-3613.
Want to get involved?
The city council meets at 277 North Second Avenue
every first and third Monday of the month at 7:00
p.m. You are welcome to attend and express your ideas and concerns.
Lead in Home Plumbing
I
f present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious
health problems, especially for pregnant women and
young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily
from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. We are responsible for providing high-quality drinking water, but we cannot
control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to two minutes
before using water for drinking or cooking. (If you
do so, you may wish to collect the flushed water and
reuse it for another beneficial purpose, such as watering plants.) If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on
lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you
can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426-4791 or www.
epa.gov/safewater/lead.
Thousands have lived without
love, not one without water.”
—W.H. Auden
“
734
Substances That Could Be in Water
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity.
In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) prescribe
regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations and California law
also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that provide the same protection for public health. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk.
Contaminants that may be present in source water include:
Microbial Contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems,
agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife;
Inorganic Contaminants, such as salts and metals, that can be naturally occurring or can result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming;
Pesticides and Herbicides that may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff, and residential uses;
Organic Chemical Contaminants, including synthetic and
volatile organic chemicals, which are by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production and which can also
come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff,
agricultural applications, and septic systems;
Radioactive Contaminants that can be naturally
occurring or can be the result of oil and gas
production and mining activities.
More information about contaminants and
potential health effects can be obtained by
calling the U.S. EPA’s Safe Drinking Water
Hotline at (800) 426-4791.
Where Does My Water Come From?
The source for the City of Oakdale is local groundwater.
Oakdale owns eight wells located around the city that supply all the water we use for drinking and landscape irrigation.
For a detailed description of the city’s water system and plans for improvements, see the Water Master Plan at http://www. oakdalegov.com/public-services-cuzk.
What Are PFAS?
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a
group of manufactured chemicals used worldwide
since the 1950s to make fluoropolymer coatings and
products that resist heat, oil, stains, grease, and water.
During production and use, PFAS can migrate into the
soil, water, and air. Most PFAS do not break down; they remain in the environment, ultimately finding their
way into drinking water. Because of their widespread
use and their persistence in the environment, PFAS are
found all over the world at low levels. Some PFAS can
build up in people and animals with repeated exposure
over time.
The most commonly studied PFAS are perfluorooctanoic
acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS).
PFOA and PFOS have been phased out of production
and use in the United States, but other countries may
still manufacture and use them.
Some products that may contain PFAS include:
• Some grease-resistant paper, fast food containers/
wrappers, microwave popcorn bags, pizza boxes
• Nonstick cookware
• Stain-resistant coatings used on carpets, upholstery, and other fabrics
• Water-resistant clothing
• Personal care products (shampoo, dental floss) and
cosmetics (nail polish, eye makeup)
• Cleaning products
• Paints, varnishes, and sealants
Even though recent efforts to remove PFAS have
reduced the likelihood of exposure, some products may
still contain them. If you have questions or concerns
about products you use in your home, contact the
Consumer Product Safety Commission at (800) 638-
2772. For a more detailed discussion on PFAS, please
visit http://bit.ly/3Z5AMm8.
Think before You Flush!
Flushing unused or expired medicines can be harmful to
your drinking water. Properly disposing of unused or
expired medication helps protect you and the environment.
Keep medications out of our waterways by disposing responsibly. To find a convenient drop-off location near you, please visit https://bit.ly/3IeRyXy.
735
REGULATED SUBSTANCES
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED
MCL
[MRDL]
PHG
(MCLG)
[MRDLG]
AMOUNT
DETECTED
RANGE
LOW-HIGH VIOLATION TYPICAL SOURCE
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
[1,2,3-TCP] (ppb)
2022 5 0.7 <0.005 <0.005–0.007 No Discharge from industrial and agricultural chemical factories; leaching from hazardous waste sites; cleaning and maintenance solvent, paint and varnish remover, and degreasing agent; by-product from production of other compounds and pesticides
Arsenic (ppb) 2021 10 0.004 2 2–3 No Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from orchards; glass and electronics production wastes Barium (ppm) 2021 1 2 <0.1 <0.1–0.1 No Discharges of oil drilling wastes and from metal refineries; erosion of natural deposits Chlorine (ppm) 2022 [4.0 (as
Cl2)]
[4 (as
Cl2)]
<0.1–1 <0.01–1.0 No Drinking water disinfectant added for treatment E. coli (State Revised Total
Coliform Rule) (# positive
samples)
2022 0 (0) 0 NA No Human and animal fecal waste
Gross Alpha Particle
Activity (pCi/l)
2019 15 (0) <3 <3–6 No Erosion of natural deposits
Nitrate [as nitrogen] (ppm) 2022 10 10 3 0.7–4 No Runoff and leaching from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks and sewage; erosion of natural deposits
TTHMs [total
trihalomethanes]1
(ppb)
2022 80 NA NA <1 - 1 No By-product of drinking water disinfection Tap water samples were collected for lead and copper analyses from sample sites throughout the community
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED AL
PHG
(MCLG)
AMOUNT
DETECTED
(90TH %ILE)
SITES ABOVE
AL/TOTAL
SITES VIOLATION TYPICAL SOURCE
Copper (ppm) 2022 1.3 0.3 <0.05 0/30 No Internal corrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits; leaching from wood preservatives Lead (ppb) 2022 15 0.2 <5 0/30 No Internal corrosion of household water plumbing systems; discharges from industrial manufacturers; erosion of natural deposits
SECONDARY SUBSTANCES
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED SMCL
PHG
(MCLG)
AMOUNT
DETECTED
RANGE
LOW-HIGH VIOLATION TYPICAL SOURCE
Chloride (ppm) 2021 500 NS 8 3–15 No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; seawater influence Iron (ppb) 2021 300 NS <100 <100–620 No Leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes Specific Conductance (umho/cm) 2021 1,600 NS 231 160–340 No Substances that form ions when in water; seawater influence Sulfate (ppm) 2021 500 NS 5 2–7 No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes Total Dissolved Solids (ppm) 2021 1,000 NS 175 130–240 No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits Turbidity (NTU) 2021 5 NS 0.05 <0.05–0.3 No Soil runoff Test Results
Our water is monitored for many different kinds of substances on a very strict sampling schedule, and the water we deliver must meet specific health standards. Here, we only show those substances that were detected in our water (a complete list of all our analytical results is available upon request). Remember that detecting a substance does not mean the water is unsafe to drink; our goal is to keep all detects below their respective maximum allowed levels.
The state recommends monitoring for certain substances less than once per year because the concentrations of these substances do not change frequently. In these cases, the most recent sample data are included, along with the year in which the sample was taken. 736
UNREGULATED SUBSTANCES 2
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED
AMOUNT
DETECTED
RANGE
LOW-HIGH TYPICAL SOURCE
Bromide (ppb) 2018 NA 28–71 NA
Hardness, Total [as
CaCO3] (ppm)
2021 84 52–120 Sum of naturally occurring polyvalent
cations, generally magnesium and calcium
Sodium (ppm) 2021 14 10–19 NA
1 Some people who drink water containing trihalomethanes in excess of the MCL over many years may experience liver, kidney, or central nervous system problems, and may have an increased risk of getting cancer. 2 Unregulated contaminant monitoring helps U.S. EPA and the State Board determine where certain contaminants occur and whether the contaminants need to be regulated.
Definitions
90th %ile: The levels reported for lead
and copper represent the 90th percentile of
the total number of sites tested. The 90th
percentile is equal to or greater than 90% of
our lead and copper detections.
AL (Regulatory Action Level): The
concentration of a contaminant which,
if exceeded, triggers treatment or other
requirements that a water system must
follow.
Level 1 Assessment: A Level 1 assessment
is a study of the water system to identify
potential problems and determine (if
possible) why total coliform bacteria have
been found in our water system.
MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level):
The highest level of a contaminant that is
allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs
are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as
is economically and technologically feasible.
Secondary MCLs (SMCLs) are set to protect
the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking
water.
MCLG (Maximum Contaminant Level
Goal): The level of a contaminant in
drinking water below which there is no
known or expected risk to health. MCLGs
are set by the U.S. EPA.
MRDL (Maximum Residual Disinfectant
Level): The highest level of a disinfectant
allowed in drinking water. There is
convincing evidence that addition of a
disinfectant is necessary for control of
microbial contaminants.
MRDLG (Maximum Residual Disinfectant
Level Goal): The level of a drinking water
disinfectant below which there is no known
or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not
reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants
to control microbial contaminants.
NA: Not applicable.
NS: No standard.
pCi/L (picocuries per liter): A measure of
radioactivity.
PDWS (Primary Drinking Water
Standard): MCLs and MRDLs for
contaminants that affect health, along with
their monitoring and reporting requirements
and water treatment requirements.
PHG (Public Health Goal): The level of a
contaminant in drinking water below which
there is no known or expected risk to health.
PHGs are set by the California EPA.
ppb (parts per billion): One part substance
per billion parts water (or micrograms per
liter).
ppm (parts per million): One part
substance per million parts water (or
milligrams per liter).
ppt (parts per trillion): One part substance
per trillion parts water (or nanograms per
liter).
µS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter):
A unit expressing the amount of electrical
conductivity of a solution.
BY THE NUMBERS
The number of Olympic-sized swimming pools it
would take to fill up all of Earth’s water.
The average cost in cents for about 5 gallons of water
supplied to a home in the U.S.
The average daily number of gallons of total home water use for each person in the U.S.
The amount of water on Earth in cubic miles.
The percent of Earth’s water that is salty or otherwise undrinkable, or locked away and unavailable in ice
caps and glaciers.
The percent of Earth’s surface that is covered by water.
The percent of the human brain that contains water.
800
TRILLION
99 50
1 71
330
MILLION
75 737
Reporting Year 2023
Presented By
City of Oakdale
PWS ID#: CA5010014
Este informe contiene información muy importante
sobre su agua potable. Tradúzcalo o hable con alguien
que lo entienda bien.
738
Important Health Information
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population.
Immunocompromised persons, such as persons with cancer
undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants, may be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA)/Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines
on appropriate means to lessen the risk of
infection by cryptosporidium and other
microbial contaminants are available
from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline
at (800) 426-4791 or water.epa.gov/
drink/hotline.
Source Water Assessment
A source water assessment was conducted for the wells of the City of Oakdale water system in February 2001.
The sources are considered most vulnerable to the following activities: sewer collection systems (sewer lines), dry cleaners, historic waste dumps, landfills, injection wells, gas stations, plastics
and synthetics producers, and septic systems. For more information regarding the assessment summary,
contact City of Oakdale Public
Works at (209) 845-3600. A copy
can be viewed at the Department of
Health Services, Office of Drinking
Water, 31 East Channel Street,
Room 270, Stockton.
Protecting Your Water
Bacteria are a natural and important part of our world.
There are around 40 trillion bacteria living in each of us; without them, we would not be able to live healthy lives.
Coliform bacteria are common in the environment and generally not harmful themselves. The presence of this bacterial form in drinking water is a concern, however, because it indicates that the water may be contaminated with other organisms that can cause disease.
In 2016 the U.S. EPA passed a regulation called the Revised Total Coliform Rule, which requires water systems to take additional steps to ensure the integrity of the drinking water distribution system by monitoring for the presence of bacteria like total coliform and E. coli. The rule requires more stringent standards than the previous regulation, and it requires water systems that may be vulnerable to contamination to have procedures in place that will minimize the incidence of contamination. Water systems that exceed a specified frequency of total coliform occurrences are required to conduct an assessment and correct any problems quickly. The U.S.
EPA anticipates greater public health protection under this regulation due to its more preventive approach to identifying and fixing problems that may affect public health. Though we are fortunate in having the highest-quality drinking water, our goal is to eliminate all potential pathways of contamination into our distribution system, and this requirement helps us accomplish that goal.
Lead in Home Plumbing
I
f present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious
health problems, especially for pregnant women and
young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily
from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. We are responsible for providing high-quality drinking water, but we cannot
control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to two minutes
before using water for drinking or cooking. (If you
do so, you may wish to collect the flushed water and
reuse it for another beneficial purpose, such as watering plants.) If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on
lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you
can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426-4791 or epa.gov/
safewater/lead.
Our Commitment
We are pleased to present to you this year’s annual water quality report. This report is a snapshot of last year’s water quality covering all testing performed between January 1 and December 31, 2023. Included are details about your source of water, what it contains, and how it compares to standards set by regulatory agencies. Our constant goal is to provide you with a safe and dependable supply of drinking water. We want you to understand the efforts we make to continually improve the water treatment process and protect our water resources. We are committed to ensuring the quality of your water and providing you with this information because informed customers are our best allies.
Questions?
For more information about this report, or for any questions relating to your drinking water, please call Jeff Roberts, Public Works Superintendent, at (209) 845-3600 or (209) 845-3616. 739
Substances That Could Be in Water
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity.
In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the U.S.
EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) prescribe regulations that limit the amount of certain
contaminants in water provided by public water systems. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations and California law also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that provide the same protection for public health. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk.
Contaminants that may be present in source water include:
Microbial Contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems,
agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife;
Inorganic Contaminants, such as salts and metals, that can be naturally occurring or can result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming;
Pesticides and Herbicides that may
come from a variety of sources such
as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff,
and residential uses;
Organic Chemical Contaminants,
including synthetic and volatile organic
chemicals, which are by-products of industrial
processes and petroleum production and which can also
come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff, agricultural applications, and septic systems;
Radioactive Contaminants that can be naturally occurring or can be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities.
More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426-4791.
To the Last Drop
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) defines drought as a
deficiency in precipitation over an extended period
of time, usually a season or more, resulting in a water shortage causing adverse impacts on vegetation,
animals, and people. Drought strikes in virtually all
climate zones, from very wet to very dry.
There are primarily three types of drought:
Meteorological Drought refers to the lack of
precipitation, or the degree of dryness and the
duration of the dry period; Agricultural Drought
refers to the agricultural impact of drought, focusing
on precipitation shortages, soil water deficits, and
reduced groundwater or reservoir levels needed for
irrigation; and Hydrological Drought pertains to
drought that usually occurs following periods of
extended precipitation shortfalls that can impact
water supply (e.g., stream flow, reservoir and lake
levels, groundwater).
Drought is a temporary aberration from normal
climatic conditions, so it can vary significantly from
one region to another. Although normally occurring,
human factors such as water demand can exacerbate
the duration and impact that drought has on a region.
By following simple water conservation measures,
you can help significantly reduce the lasting effects of extended drought.
Community Participation
You are invited to participate in our public forum and voice your concerns about your drinking water. We meet the
first and third Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, 277 North Second Avenue.
When the well is dry, we
know the worth of water.”
—Benjamin Franklin
740
Test Results
Our water is monitored for many different kinds of substances on a very strict sampling schedule, and the water we deliver must meet specific health standards. Here, we only show those substances that were detected in our water (a complete list of all our analytical results is available upon request). Remember that detecting a substance does not mean the water is unsafe to drink; our goal is to keep all detects below their respective maximum allowed levels.
The state recommends monitoring for certain substances less than once per year because the concentrations of these substances do not change frequently. In these cases, the most recent sample data is included, along with the year in which the sample was taken.
REGULATED SUBSTANCES
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED
MCL
[MRDL]
PHG
(MCLG)
[MRDLG]
AMOUNT
DETECTED
RANGE
LOW-HIGH VIOLATION TYPICAL SOURCE
Arsenic (ppb) 2021 10 0.004 2.6 2.0–3.3 No Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from orchards; glass and electronics production wastes
Barium (ppm) 2021 1 2 0.0601 0.071–0.130 No Discharges of oil drilling wastes and from metal refineries; erosion of natural deposits
Chlorine (ppm) 2023 [4.0 (as
Cl2)]
[4 (as
Cl2)]
0.32 0.27–0.38 No Drinking water disinfectant added for treatment Gross Alpha Particle Activity (pCi/L) 2019 15 (0) <3 <3–6 No Erosion of natural deposits Nitrate [as nitrogen] (ppm) 2023 10 10 2.14 0.73–4.0 No Runoff and leaching from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks and sewage; erosion of natural deposits
TTHMs [total trihalomethanes]–Stage 1 (ppb) 2023 80 NA 1.44 0.51–3.7 No By-product of drinking water disinfection Tap water samples were collected for lead and copper analyses from sample sites throughout the community
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED AL
PHG
(MCLG)
AMOUNT
DETECTED
(90TH %ILE)
SITES ABOVE
AL/TOTAL
SITES VIOLATION TYPICAL SOURCE
Copper (ppm) 2022 1.3 0.3 0.053 0/30 No Internal corrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits; leaching from wood preservatives Lead (ppb) 2022 15 0.2 ND 0/30 No Internal corrosion of household water plumbing systems; discharges from industrial manufacturers; erosion of natural deposits
SECONDARY SUBSTANCES
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED SMCL
PHG
(MCLG)
AMOUNT
DETECTED
RANGE
LOW-HIGH VIOLATION TYPICAL SOURCE
Chloride (ppm) 2021 500 NS 7.87 2.8–14 No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; seawater influence Specific Conductance (µmho/cm) 2021 1,600 NS 237 160–350 No Substances that form ions when in water; seawater influence Sulfate (ppm) 2021 500 NS 3.73 2–6.6 No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes Total Dissolved Solids (ppm) 2021 1,000 NS 177 130–240 No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits Turbidity (NTU) 2021 5 NS 0.074 0.10–0.28 No Soil runoff UNREGULATED SUBSTANCES 1
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED
AMOUNT
DETECTED
RANGE
LOW-HIGH TYPICAL SOURCE
Hardness, Total [as CaCO3] (ppm) 2021 69 65–120 Sum of polyvalent cations present in the water, generally naturally occurring magnesium and calcium Sodium (ppm) 2021/2023 13.41 9.9–20 Naturally occurring 1 Unregulated contaminant monitoring helps the U.S. EPA and SWRCB determine where certain contaminants occur and whether the contaminants need to be regulated. 741
Definitions
90th %ile: The levels reported for lead and copper represent the 90th percentile of the total number of sites tested. The 90th percentile is equal to or greater than 90% of our lead and copper detections.
AL (Regulatory Action Level): The concentration of a
contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow.
MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and technologically feasible. Secondary MCLs (SMCLs) are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water.
MCLG (Maximum Contaminant Level Goal): The level of a
contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S. EPA.
MRDL (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level): The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.
MRDLG (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal):
The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
NA: Not applicable.
ND (Not detected): Indicates that the substance was not found by laboratory analysis.
NS: No standard.
NTU (Nephelometric Turbidity Units): Measurement of the clarity, or turbidity, of water. Turbidity in excess of 5 NTU is just noticeable to the average person.
pCi/L (picocuries per liter): A measure of radioactivity.
PDWS (Primary Drinking Water Standard): MCLs and MRDLs
for contaminants that affect health, along with their monitoring and reporting requirements, and water treatment requirements.
PHG (Public Health Goal): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. PHGs are set by the California EPA.
ppb (µg/L) (parts per billion): One part substance per billion parts water (or micrograms per liter).
ppm (mg/L) (parts per million): One part substance per million parts water (or milligrams per liter).
µmho/cm (micromhos per centimeter): A unit expressing the amount of electrical conductivity of a solution.
Water Conservation Tips
You can play a role in conserving water and save yourself money in the process by becoming conscious of the amount of water your household is using and looking for ways to use less whenever you can. It is not hard to conserve water. Here are a few tips:
• Automatic dishwashers use four to six gallons for every cycle, regardless of how many dishes are loaded.
So get a run for your money and load it to capacity.
• Turn off the tap when brushing your teeth.
• Check every faucet in your home for leaks. Just a slow drip can waste 15 to 20 gallons a day. Fix it and you can save almost 6,000 gallons per year.
• Check your toilets for leaks by putting a few drops of food coloring in the tank. Watch for a few minutes to see if the color shows up in the bowl. It is not uncommon to lose up to 100 gallons a day from an invisible toilet leak. Fix it and you save more than 30,000 gallons a year. • Use your water meter to detect hidden leaks. Simply turn off all taps and water-using appliances. Then check the meter after 15 minutes. If it moved, you have a leak.
Where Does My Water Come From?
The source for the City of Oakdale is local groundwater. Oakdale owns seven wells located around the city that supply all the water we use for drinking and landscape irrigation. For a detailed description of the city’s water system and plans for improvements, see the Water Master Plan at oakdalegov.com/public-services-cuzk. 742
Reporting Year 2024
Presented By
City of Oakdale
Este informe contiene información muy importante sobre su agua potable. Tradúzcalo o hable con alguien que lo entienda bien. PWS ID#: CA5010014 743
Our Commitment
We are pleased to present to you this year’s annual water quality report. This report is a snapshot of last year’s water quality covering all testing performed between January 1 and December 31, 2024. Included are details about your source of water, what it contains, and how it compares to standards set by regulatory agencies. Our constant goal is to provide you with a safe and dependable supply of drinking water. We want you to understand the efforts we make to continually improve the water treatment process and protect our water resources. We are committed to ensuring the quality of your water and providing you with this information because informed customers are our best allies.
Where Does My Water Come From?
The source for the City of Oakdale is local groundwater.
Oakdale owns seven wells located around the city that
supply all the water we use for drinking and landscape
irrigation. For a detailed description of the city’s water system and plans for improvements, see the Water Master Plan at oakdalegov.com/public-works.
Community Participation
You are invited to participate in our public forum and voice your concerns about your drinking water. We meet the
first and third Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, 277 North Second Avenue.
Source Water Assessment
Asource water assessment was conducted for the wells of the City of Oakdale water system in February 2001.
The sources are considered most vulnerable to the following activities: sewer collection systems (sewer lines), dry cleaners, historic waste dumps, landfills, injection wells, gas stations, plastics and synthetics producers, and septic systems. For more information regarding the assessment summary, contact City of Oakdale Public Works at (209) 845-3600. A copy can be viewed at the Department of Health Services, Office of Drinking Water, 31 East Channel Street, Room 270, Stockton.
Important Health Information
Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants
in drinking water than the general population.
Immunocompromised persons such as persons with cancer
undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone
organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health-care providers. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.
EPA)/Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) guidelines on
appropriate means to lessen the risk
of infection by Cryptosporidium and
other microbial contaminants are
available from the Safe Drinking
Water Hotline (800-426-4791) or
epa.gov/safewater.
Tip Top Tap
The most common signs that your faucet or sink is affecting the quality of your drinking water are discolored water, sink or faucet stains, a buildup of particles, unusual odors or tastes, and a reduced flow of water. The solutions to these problems may be in your hands.
Kitchen Sink and Drain
Handwashing, soap scum buildup, and the handling of raw meats and vegetables can contaminate your sink. Clogged drains can lead to unclean sinks and backed-up water in which bacteria (i.e., pink or black slime growth) can grow and contaminate the sink area and faucet, causing a rotten egg odor. Disinfect and clean the sink and drain area regularly and flush with hot water.
Faucets, Screens, and Aerators
Chemicals and bacteria can splash and accumulate on the faucet screen and aerator, which are located on the tip of faucets and can collect particles like sediment and minerals, resulting in a decreased flow from the faucet. Clean and disinfect the aerators or screens on a regular basis.
Check with your plumber if you find particles in the faucet screen, as they could be pieces of plastic from the hot water heater dip tube. Faucet gaskets can break down and cause black, oily slime. If you find this slime, replace the faucet gasket with a higher-quality product. White scaling or hard deposits on faucets and showerheads may be caused by water with high levels of calcium carbonate. Clean these fixtures with vinegar or use water softening to reduce the calcium carbonate levels for the hot water system.
Water Filtration/Treatment Devices
A smell of rotten eggs can be a sign of bacteria on the filters or in the treatment system. The system can also become clogged over time, so regular filter replacement is important. (Remember to replace your refrigerator filter!)
Think Before You Flush!
Flushing unused or expired medicines can be harmful to your drinking water. Properly disposing of unused or expired medication helps protect you and the environment. Keep
medications out of our waterways by disposing responsibly. To find a convenient drop-off location near you, please visit https:// bit.ly/3IeRyXy.
QUESTIONS?
For more information about this report, or for any questions relating to your drinking water, please call Jeff Roberts, Public Works Superintendent, at (209) 845-3600 or (209) 845-3616. 744
Substances That Could Be in Water What are PFAS?
The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity.
Contaminants that may be present in source water include:
Microbial Contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, that may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife.
Inorganic Contaminants, such as salts and metals, that can be naturally occurring or result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming.
Pesticides and Herbicides that may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwater runoff, and residential uses.
Organic Chemical Contaminants, including synthetic and
volatile organic chemicals, that are by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production and can also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff, agricultural application, and septic systems.
Radioactive Contaminants that can be naturally occurring or the result of oil and gas production and mining activities.
To ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the U.S. EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) prescribe regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulations and California law also establish limits for contaminants in bottled water that provide the same protection for public health.
Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants.
The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the U.S.
EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791).
Water Conservation Tips
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of manufactured chemicals used worldwide since the 1950s
to make fluoropolymer coatings and products that resist heat, oil, stains, grease, and water. During production and use, PFAS can migrate into the soil, water, and air. Most PFAS do not break down; they remain in the environment, ultimately finding their way into drinking water. Because of their widespread use and their persistence in the environment, PFAS are found all over the world at low levels. Some PFAS can build up in people and animals with repeated exposure over time.
The most commonly studied PFAS are perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS). PFOA
and PFOS have been phased out of production and use in the United States, but other countries may still manufacture and use them.
Some products that may contain PFAS include:
• Some grease-resistant paper, fast food containers/wrappers, microwave popcorn bags, pizza boxes
• Nonstick cookware
• Stain-resistant coatings used on
carpets, upholstery, and other
fabrics
• Water-resistant clothing
• Personal care products (shampoo,
dental floss) and cosmetics (nail polish,
eye makeup)
• Cleaning products
• Paints, varnishes, and sealants
Even though recent efforts to remove PFAS have reduced the likelihood of exposure, some products may still contain them.
If you have questions or concerns about products you use in your home, contact the Consumer Product Safety Commission at (800) 638-2772. For a more detailed discussion on PFAS, please visit http://bit.ly/3Z5AMm8.
You can play a role in conserving water and save yourself money in the process by becoming conscious of the amount of water your household is using and looking for ways to use less whenever you can. It is not hard to conserve water. Here are a few tips:
Automatic dishwashers use three to six gallons for every cycle, regardless of how many dishes are loaded. So get a run for your money and load it to capacity.
Turn off the tap when brushing your teeth.
Check every faucet in your home for leaks. Just a slow drip can waste 15 to 20 gallons a day. Fix it and you can save almost 6,000 gallons per year.
Check your toilets for leaks by putting a few drops of food coloring in the tank. Watch for a few minutes to see if the color shows up in the bowl. It is not uncommon to lose up to 100 gallons a day from an invisible toilet leak. Fix it and you save more than 30,000 gallons a year.
Use your water meter to detect hidden leaks. Simply turn off all taps and water-using appliances. Then check the meter after 15 minutes. If it moved, you have a leak.
745
Test Results
Our water is monitored for many different kinds of substances on a very strict sampling schedule, and the water we deliver must meet specific health standards. Here, we only show those substances that were detected in our water (a complete list of all our analytical results is available upon request). Remember that detecting a substance does not mean the water is unsafe to drink; our goal is to keep all detects below their respective maximum allowed levels.
The state recommends monitoring for certain substances less than once per year because the concentrations of these substances do not change frequently. In these cases, the most recent sample data is included, along with the year in which the sample was taken.
REGULATED SUBSTANCES
PHG
(MCLG)
[MRDLG]
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED
MCL
[MRDL]
AMOUNT
DETECTED
RANGE
LOW-HIGH VIOLATION TYPICAL SOURCE
Arsenic (ppb) 2024 10 0.004 2.2 ND–3.5 No Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from orchards; glass and electronics production wastes Barium (ppm) 2024 1 2 0.036 ND–0.13 No Discharges of oil drilling wastes and from metal refineries; erosion of natural deposits Chlorine (ppm) 2024 [4.0 (as
Cl2)]
[4 (as
Cl2)]
0.39 0.31–0.46 No Drinking water disinfectant added for treatment Gross Alpha Particle
Activity (pCi/L)
2019 15 (0) 1.58 ND–6 No Erosion of natural deposits
HAA5 [sum of 5 haloacetic
acids] (ppb)
2024 60 NA ND NA No By-product of drinking water disinfection Nitrate [as nitrogen] (ppm) 2024 10 10 2.95 0.82–3.9 No Runoff and leaching from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks and sewage; erosion of natural deposits TTHMs [total
trihalomethanes] (ppb)
2024 80 NA 0.28 ND–1.1 No By-product of drinking water disinfection Tap water samples were collected for lead and copper analyses from sample sites throughout the community AMOUNT
DETECTED
(90TH %ILE)
SITES ABOVE
AL/TOTAL
SITES
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED
PHG
(MCLG)
RANGE
AL LOW-HIGH VIOLATION TYPICAL SOURCE
Copper (ppm) 2022 1.3 0.3 0.057 NA 0/30 No Internal corrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits; leaching from wood preservatives
Lead (ppb) 2022 15 0.2 ND NA 0/30 No Corrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits
SECONDARY SUBSTANCES
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED
PHG
(MCLG)
AMOUNT
DETECTED
RANGE
SMCL LOW-HIGH VIOLATION TYPICAL SOURCE
Chloride (ppm) 2024 500 NS 8.2 3.2–16 No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; seawater influence Specific Conductance (µS/
cm)
2024 1,600 NS 234 150–320 No Substances that form ions when in water; seawater influence Sulfate (ppm) 2024 500 NS 5.4 2.4–8.5 No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes Total Dissolved Solids
(ppm)
2024 1,000 NS 170 130–220 No Runoff/leaching from natural deposits UNREGULATED SUBSTANCES 1
SUBSTANCE
(UNIT OF MEASURE)
YEAR
SAMPLED
AMOUNT
DETECTED
RANGE
LOW-HIGH TYPICAL SOURCE 1 Unregulated contaminant monitoring helps the U.S. EPA and SWRCB determine where certain contaminants occur and whether the contaminants need to be regulated.
Hardness, Total [as CaCO3] (ppm) 2024 88.7 54–123 NA
Sodium (ppm) July 2024 12.4 9.6–17 Naturally occurring
Vanadium (ppb) 2024 9.4 6.1–12 NA
746
Definitions
90th %ile: The levels reported for lead and copper represent the 90th percentile of the total number of sites tested. The 90th percentile is equal to or greater than 90% of our lead and copper detections.
AL (Regulatory Action Level): The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow.
MCL (Maximum Contaminant Level): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and technologically feasible. Secondary MCLs (SMCLs) are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water.
MCLG (Maximum Contaminant Level Goal): The level of a
contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S. EPA.
MRDL (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level): The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.
MRDLG (Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal): The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
NA: Not applicable.
ND (Not detected): Indicates that the substance was not found by laboratory analysis.
NS: No standard.
pCi/L (picocuries per liter): A measure of radioactivity.
PDWS (Primary Drinking Water Standard): MCLs and MRDLs
for contaminants that affect health, along with their monitoring and reporting requirements and water treatment requirements.
PHG (Public Health Goal): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health.
PHGs are set by the California EPA.
ppb (parts per billion): One part substance per billion parts water (or micrograms per liter).
ppm (parts per million): One part substance per million parts water (or milligrams per liter).
µS/cm (microsiemens per centimeter): A unit expressing the amount of electrical conductivity of a solution.
Lead in Home Plumbing
Lead can cause serious health effects in people of all ages, especially pregnant people, infants (both formula-fed and breastfed), and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and parts used in service lines and in home plumbing. The City of Oakdale is responsible for providing high-quality drinking water and removing lead pipes but cannot control the variety of materials used in the plumbing in your home. Because lead levels may vary over time, lead exposure is possible even when your tap sampling results do not detect lead at one point in time. You can help protect yourself and your family by identifying and removing lead materials within your home plumbing and taking steps to reduce your family’s risk. Using a filter certified by an American National Standards Institute-accredited certifier to reduce lead is effective in reducing lead exposures. Follow the instructions provided with the filter to ensure it is used properly. Use only cold water for drinking, cooking, and making baby formula. Boiling does not remove lead from water.
Before using tap water for drinking, cooking, or making baby formula, flush your pipes for several minutes. You can do this by running your tap, taking a shower, or doing laundry or a load of dishes. If you have a lead or galvanized service line requiring replacement, you may need to flush your pipes for a longer period. If you are concerned about lead and wish to have your water tested, contact the City of Oakdale. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available at epa.gov/safewater/lead.
To address lead in drinking water, public water systems were required to develop and maintain an inventory of service line materials by October 16, 2024. Developing an inventory and identifying the location of lead service lines (LSL) is the first step for beginning LSL replacement and protecting public health. The lead service inventory is available upon request from the City of Oakdale. Please contact us if you would like more information about the inventory or any lead sampling that has been done. 747
City of Oakdale
2025 Urban Water Management Plan
May 2026
H
Appendix H
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
748
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
DRAFT
MAY 2026
Prepared for:
CITY OF OAKDALE
PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT
455 S. Fifth Avenue
Oakdale, CA 95361
(209) 845-3600
Prepared by:
BLACK WATER CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
602 Lyell Drive
Modesto, CA 95356
(209) 322-1820
749
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Water Supply Reliability Analysis .......................................................................................................... 3
2.1 Seismic Risk Considerations .......................................................................................................... 4
2.2 Ongoing Reliability Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 4 3 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment Procedures ............................................................... 5
3.1 Decision-Making Process .............................................................................................................. 6
3.2 Key Data Inputs and Methodologies ............................................................................................. 7
3.3 Water Demands ............................................................................................................................ 7
3.4 Water Supplies .............................................................................................................................. 8
3.5 Infrastructure Considerations ....................................................................................................... 8
3.6 Other Factors ................................................................................................................................ 8
3.7 Water Shortage Assessment ......................................................................................................... 8 4 Six Standard Water Shortage Levels ..................................................................................................... 9 5 Shortage Response Actions ................................................................................................................ 11
5.1 Supply Augmentation Actions ..................................................................................................... 12
5.2 Demand Reduction Actions ........................................................................................................ 13
5.3 Operational Changes ................................................................................................................... 17
5.4 Additional Mandatory Prohibitions ............................................................................................ 18
5.5 Emergency Response Plan .......................................................................................................... 18
5.6 Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan ............................................................................ 19
5.7 Shortage Response Action Effectiveness .................................................................................... 19 6 Communication Protocols .................................................................................................................. 21
6.1 Communication for Foreseeable Events ..................................................................................... 21
6.2 Communication for Unforeseeable Events ................................................................................. 22 7 Compliance and Enforcement ............................................................................................................ 23 8 Legal Authorities ................................................................................................................................. 24 9 Financial Consequences of WSCP ....................................................................................................... 25 10 Monitoring and Reporting .................................................................................................................. 26 11 WSCP Refinement Procedures ............................................................................................................ 27 12 Special Water Feature Distinction ...................................................................................................... 28 13 Plan Adoption, Submittal and Availability .......................................................................................... 29
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1 – Annual Assessment Key Responsibilities ................................................................................... 6 Table 4-1 – WSCP Levels (DWR Table 8-1) .................................................................................................. 10 Table 5-1 – Supply Augmentation and Other Actions (DWR Table 8-2 Retail) ........................................... 13 Table 5-2 – Demand Reduction Actions (DWR Table 8-3) .......................................................................... 14 Table 5-3 – Historical Water Production Data ............................................................................................ 17 Table 5-4 – Shortage Gap Estimates ........................................................................................................... 17 750
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
ii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3-1 Example Annual Assessment and Annual Shortage Report Timeline .......................................... 6
APPENDICES
Appendix A – Stanislaus County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan Appendix B – Notices to Public and Public Outreach Efforts Appendix C – City Resolution Adopting WSCP
751
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
iii
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Annual Assessment Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment Annual Shortage Report Annual Water Shortage Assessment Report City City of Oakdale
CWC California Water Code
DWR Department of Water Resources
ERP Emergency Response Plan
gpcd gallons per capita per day
MG Million Gallons
MJHMP Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan
OID Oakdale Irrigation District
OMC Oakdale Municipal Code
SB Senate Bill
SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition
UWMP Urban Water Management Plan
WSCP Water Shortage Contingency Plan
752
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
1 1 Introduction
Water agencies across California face increasing challenges in reliably meeting customer demands due to a combination of population growth, climate change, prolonged droughts, regulatory constraints, and the potential for catastrophic natural or human-caused events. A water shortage occurs when the available water supply is insufficient to meet normally expected customer water use at a given point in time. Recent history, including the severe statewide drought from 2012 through 2016, demonstrated the vulnerability of many water systems and underscored the importance of proactive planning and preparedness.
In response to these challenges, the California State Legislature enacted Assembly Bill 1668 and Senate Bill 606, collectively known as the 2018 Water Conservation Legislation. Among other requirements, this legislation mandates that Urban Water Management Plans (UWMPs) include a Water Shortage Contingency Plan (WSCP) pursuant to California Water Code (CWC) Section 10632. The WSCP establishes a comprehensive, actionable framework for evaluating water supply reliability and implementing response actions during varying levels of water shortage. While the WSCP is submitted as part of the 2025 UWMP, it is structured as a stand-alone document that may be updated or amended independently, as needed, without requiring amendment of the UWMP itself.
Water shortage contingency planning is a strategic and forward-looking process intended to prepare for and respond to both foreseeable and unforeseeable water supply disruptions. Even where the probability of shortage appears low, a WSCP serves as an essential component of drought and emergency management policy by improving preparedness and reducing the severity of impacts should shortages occur. Drought, regulatory actions, infrastructure failures, seismic events, wildfires, floods, and other natural or man-made disasters may occur with little warning, making advanced planning critical.
The WSCP functions as the supplier’s operational manual for managing water shortages. It enables near real-time assessment of water supply availability and provides structured, pre-planned response actions aligned with defined levels of shortage. During drought or emergency conditions, the WSCP serves as a roadmap for decision-makers, staff, and the public, allowing for predictable, transparent, and accountable implementation of water shortage response measures. Importantly, Water Code Section 10632.3 directs the State Water Resources Control Board, during a drought emergency, to defer to locally adopted WSCPs to the extent practicable, reinforcing the role of the WSCP in supporting local decision-making.
The WSCP is developed based on a thorough understanding of the supplier’s water supply reliability, including existing and projected demands, hydrologic variability, regulatory constraints, infrastructure vulnerabilities, and the availability of alternative or supplemental supplies. By anticipating both shortterm and long-term risks to supply, the WSCP identifies feasible and locally appropriate actions to manage shortages, minimize service disruptions, and protect public health and safety. In addition, the analysis and response framework documented in the WSCP may support justification for future projects, policies, and programs intended to reduce vulnerability to water shortages. 753
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
2 Pursuant to CWC Section 10632, the WSCP is required to include the following elements:
• Key attributes of the water supply reliability analysis conducted pursuant to CWC Section 10632(a)(1), which evaluates the supplier’s ability to meet demands under varying hydrologic and operational conditions.
• Six standard water shortage levels corresponding to progressive shortages of up to 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 percent, and shortages greater than 50 percent. [CWC Section 10632(a)(3)(A)] • Locally appropriate shortage response actions for each shortage level, including supply augmentation, demand reduction, operational changes, and mandatory water-use prohibitions, along with estimates of the extent to which each action addresses the supply-demand gap. [CWC Section 10632(a)(4)]
• Procedures for conducting an Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment (Annual Assessment), including the data and methods used to evaluate supply reliability. Urban water suppliers are required to submit an Annual Water Shortage Assessment Report (Annual Shortage Report) to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) by July 1 of each year, beginning in the year following adoption of the 2020 UWMP. [CWC Sections 10632(a)(2) and 10632.1] • Communication protocols and procedures to inform customers, the public, and government entities of current or anticipated water shortages and associated response actions. [CWC Section 10632(a)(5)]
• Monitoring and reporting procedures to ensure appropriate data collection, track customer compliance, evaluate the effectiveness of response actions, and meet applicable state reporting requirements. [CWC Section 10632(a)(9)]
• A re-evaluation and improvement process to periodically assess the performance and functionality of the WSCP and to make adjustments based on observed conditions, monitoring results, and evolving risks. [CWC Section 10632(a)(10)] 754
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
3 2 Water Supply Reliability Analysis
Legal Requirements:
Water Code Section 10632(a)(1)
The analysis of water supply reliability conducted pursuant to Section 10635.
Water Code Section 10632.5(a)
In addition to the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 10632, beginning January 1, 2020, the plan shall include a seismic risk assessment and mitigation plan to assess the vulnerability of each of the various facilities of a water system and mitigate those vulnerabilities.
In accordance with CWC Section 10632(a)(1), this section presents findings from the City of Oakdale’s (City) water system reliability analysis and identifies the key factors that may contribute to future water shortage conditions. This evaluation incorporates projected water use trends from Chapter 4 of the UWMP, the inventory of current and planned water supply sources outlined in Chapter 6, and the water supply reliability and drought risk assessments presented in Chapter 7. The reliability assessment spans the years 2025 through 2045, while the drought risk assessment covers the five-year period from 2026 to 2030. Together, these elements provide a comprehensive understanding of the City’s water resource capacity and its preparedness to respond to potential shortage scenarios.
When water supply shortfalls are anticipated or observed, the City may declare a water shortage level in accordance with this WSCP, as described in Section 4. In response to identified reliability challenges, the City continues to evaluate additional supply, operational, and water management strategies, as documented in Chapter 7 of the City’s 2025 UWMP.
In addition to hydrologic variability, water supply reliability may be affected by factors beyond the City’s direct control, including statewide water supply conditions, actions taken by upstream or neighboring agencies, regulatory changes, and emergency events. A water shortage condition occurs when the available potable water supply is insufficient to meet ordinary water demands necessary to protect public health and safety. While some water shortages may be foreseeable through planning and monitoring, unforeseen or sudden emergency events, such as power outages, infrastructure failures, or seismic events, may also disrupt water supplies.
The City's sole source of drinking water is from the groundwater aquifer underlying the community. The City currently obtains groundwater from seven wells. The City’s wells pump from a non-adjudicated groundwater basin (Modesto Subbasin) with no limits on pumping. Although the Modesto Subbasin is not considered to be in a state of critical overdraft, a majority of the cities within the basin rely solely on groundwater and as such the basin has been classified as a high-priority basin. Therefore, the future reliability of the groundwater supply will depend on the long-term balance of groundwater extraction and recharge for the Modesto Subbasin as a whole.
The City’s 2025 UWMP evaluates the long-term (20-year) and near-term (5-year) supply reliability of the City’s water system, including consideration for a normal year, single dry year, and a 5-year dry period.
Constraints on the water supply reliability for the City are primarily water quantity, water quality, and climate change. The 2025 UWMP estimates that the reliability of the City’s water supply is sufficient to meet long-term and near-term demands based on available information for the groundwater, positive 755
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
4 impacts from State requirements for sustainable groundwater management, continued implementation of water conservation measures, and the use of Oakdale Irrigation District’s (OID) surface water as a nonpotable irrigation supply.
2.1 Seismic Risk Considerations
The City relies on water supplies from groundwater wells located across the city pumping water directly from the Modesto Subbasin. As this is the City’s sole water source, a seismic event could harm the City’s water system by adversely affecting wells, pump stations, storage tanks, and distribution piping. The City satisfies the seismic risk assessment and mitigation requirements of CWC Section 10632.5 in its adopted multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation planning documents.
The City participates in the Stanislaus County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan (MJHMP), which evaluates regional seismic hazards, identifies vulnerabilities of critical infrastructure, and outlines mitigation strategies intended to reduce risk and improve system resilience. The MJHMP includes assessment of earthquake hazards applicable to the City and provides mitigation actions relevant to water supply and other essential infrastructure. The MJHMP is included as Appendix A.
2.2 Ongoing Reliability Evaluation
Consistent with CWC Section 10632(a)(2), the City will conduct an Annual Assessment to evaluate nearterm water supply reliability under prevailing hydrologic, regulatory, and operational conditions. These Annual Assessments will inform the need for implementation, adjustment, or escalation of water shortage response actions under this WSCP as discussed in Section 3. The analyses and response framework contained in this WSCP have been developed in the context of the City’s existing water supply portfolio and reliability evaluations.
756
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
5 3 Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment Procedures Legal Requirements:
Water Code Section 10632 (a)
Every urban water supplier shall prepare and adopt a water shortage contingency plan as part of its urban water management plan that consists of each of the following elements Water Code Section 10632(a)(2)
The procedures used in conducting an annual water supply and demand assessment that include, at a minimum, both of the following:
(A) The written decision-making process that an urban water supplier will use each year to determine its water supply reliability.
(B) The key data inputs and assessment methodology used to evaluate the urban water supplier’s water supply reliability for the current year and one dry year, including all of the following:
(i) Current year unconstrained demand, considering weather, growth, and other influencing factors, such as policies to manage current supplies to meet demand objectives in future years, as applicable. (ii) Current year available supply, considering hydrological and regulatory conditions in the current year and one dry year. The annual supply and demand assessment may consider more than one dry year solely at the discretion of the urban water supplier.
(iii) Existing infrastructure capabilities and plausible constraints. (iv) A defined set of locally applicable evaluation criteria that are consistently relied upon for each annual water supply and demand assessment.
(v) A description and quantification of each source of water supply.
Water Code Section 10632.1.
An urban water supplier shall conduct an annual water supply and demand assessment pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 10632 and, on or before July 1 of each year, submit an annual water shortage assessment report to the department with information for anticipated shortage, triggered shortage response actions, compliance and enforcement actions, and communication actions consistent with the supplier’s water shortage contingency plan. An urban water supplier that relies on imported water from the State Water Project or the Bureau of Reclamation shall submit its annual water supply and demand assessment within 14 days of receiving its final allocations, or by July 1 of each year, whichever is later.
Beginning in 2022, CWC Section 10632.1 requires the City to conduct an Annual Assessment and submit an Annual Shortage Report to the DWR on or before July 1 of each year. The purpose of these requirements is to evaluate near-term water supply reliability for the upcoming year and to ensure that appropriate water shortage response actions are identified and implemented in a timely manner, if warranted.
To assist water suppliers in preparing the Annual Assessment and Annual Shortage Report, DWR issued the Annual Water Supply and Demand Assessment Guidance (April 2022) and developed an optional annual assessment tool to support evaluation of water supply and demand calculations, estimation of shortage conditions, planning of shortage response actions, and completion of the Annual Shortage Report submittal tables. Since 2022, City staff have utilized this optional tool. 757
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
6 This section of the WSCP describes the procedures to assist with the preparation of the Annual Assessment and Annual Shortage Report. These procedures are intended to establish a consistent framework for annual evaluation of water supply and demand conditions, including the timing, data sources, analytical methods, and decision-making processes used to identify potential shortage conditions and corresponding response actions.
The methods and procedures described in this section are subject to revision as updated guidance from DWR becomes available. The City will modify its Annual Assessment procedures, as appropriate, to remain consistent with future DWR requirements and recommendations.
3.1 Decision-Making Process
The City Public Services Department will be responsible for preparing and submitting the Annual Shortage Report to the DWR. Potential key responsibilities for preparation of the Annual Assessment and Annual Shortage Report are listed in Table 3-1. Early in the process, the key team members will be selected and assigned responsibilities to ensure accurate and timely completion of the documents. The Public Services Director, Public Works Superintendent, or their designee shall be responsible for approving the Annual Shortage Report and presenting recommended shortage response actions to the City for approval (if applicable).
Table 3-1 – Annual Assessment Key Responsibilities
# Activity
1 Convene Annual Assessment and Annual Shortage Report team 2 Information collection and review (see Section 3.2, Key Data Inputs and Methodologies) 3 Prepare draft Annual Shortage Report
4 Finalize Annual Shortage Report
5 Submit Annual Shortage Report to DWR
An example timeline for the decision-making process is provided in Figure 3-1. Actual dates for each activity may vary. The Annual Assessment is required to be submitted to DWR by July 1 each year.
Figure 3-1 Example Annual Assessment and Annual Shortage Report Timeline 758
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
7 3.2 Key Data Inputs and Methodologies
To be consistent with the Annual Assessment Guidance, the current year is defined as the 12-month period which ends on June 30th, preceding the July 1st due date of the Annual Shortage Report and the year to follow is defined as the subsequent calendar year.
In evaluating available water supplies, the following factors should be considered:
• Summary of active water supply sources and their capacities; • Monthly water production data for the previous calendar year; • Available weather data for the previous calendar year and current year; • Population data for the previous calendar year and current year; • Recent growth projections in terms of land use and/or population; • Recently completed documents and studies related to the water system and water supply sources;
• Recent regulatory documents;
• Water quality data for the previous calendar year;
• Water system improvements completed in the previous calendar year and planned for the next two years;
• Information on issues encountered in water system for the previous calendar year. Issues may include exceeding contaminant limits, breaks in pipeline, and decreased well production; • Current and projected hydrological conditions; and
• Other data which affects the water system.
Estimated unconstrained water demands will be input to the Annual Assessment. Unconstrained water demand represents customer demand in the absence of water shortage response actions or conservation measures. In estimating water demands, the following factors should be considered:
• Weather conditions;
• Water year type;
• Population changes, including those associated with development projects; • Anticipated new demands, such as changes in land use; • Pending policy changes that may affect water use; and • Infrastructure operations.
3.3 Water Demands
Water demands for the upcoming year will be developed in this section. The methodology for the calculations should be logged. References for the sources and assumptions used should be provided.
Unconstrained customer demands for subsequent years may be calculated and included.
Various methods could be used to calculate water demand. The method should be consistent with previous City documents, including the 2025 UWMP. If an alternative method is used, reasons for the change in approach shall be noted. The most common methods will either involve the use of population projections and a per capita water demand or water demand factors for various types of land uses and estimates for developed areas, by land use type.
759
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
8 3.4 Water Supplies
This section of the Annual Assessment should include information on the potable and non-potable water supply sources and projected water supply, by month.
3.5 Infrastructure Considerations
The City should consider how infrastructure capabilities and constraints may affect its ability to deliver supplies to meet customer demand in the coming year. Anticipated capital projects that may influence capabilities, such as repairs that may constrain capabilities (e.g., planned treatment plant upgrades) or new projects that may add capacity (e.g., a new groundwater well or system intertie), should be described.
3.6 Other Factors
Other factors that can influence or disrupt the water supply, along with unique local considerations, should be described. These factors may include recent regulatory requirements, documents and studies related to the water system and water supply sources, and weather conditions.
3.7 Water Shortage Assessment
Available water supplies and projected water demands will be compared to assess if there will be a surplus or shortage of water supply without any WSCP actions.
Based on the results of the Annual Assessment, the City will identify and evaluate appropriate water shortage response actions consistent with the water shortage levels and response actions established in this WSCP.
760
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
9 4 Six Standard Water Shortage Levels
Legal Requirements:
Water Code Section 10632(a)(3)
(A) Six standard water shortage levels corresponding to progressive ranges of up to 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 percent shortages and greater than 50 percent shortage. Urban water suppliers shall define these shortage levels based on the suppliers’ water supply conditions, including percentage reductions in water supply, changes in groundwater levels, changes in surface elevation or level of subsidence, or other changes in hydrological or other local conditions indicative of the water supply available for use.
Shortage levels shall also apply to catastrophic interruption of water supplies, including, but not limited to, a regional power outage, an earthquake, and other potential emergency events. (B) An urban water supplier with an existing water shortage contingency plan that uses different water shortage levels may comply with the requirement in subparagraph (A) by developing and including a cross-reference relating its existing categories to the six standard water shortage levels.
To provide a consistent regional and statewide framework for communicating the severity of water supply shortage conditions, the 2018 Water Conservation Legislation requires urban water suppliers to define six standard water shortage levels corresponding to progressive ranges of water supply shortages. CWC Section 10632(a)(3) requires these shortage levels to be based on the supplier’s water supply conditions and may consider factors such as percentage reductions in available water supply, changes in groundwater levels, changes in surface water elevations, land subsidence, or other hydrologic or local conditions indicative of the water supply available for use.
In accordance with these requirements, the City adopted the six standard water shortage levels established by the California DWR for inclusion in WSCP. These standard shortage levels correspond to progressive water supply shortages of up to 10 percent, 20 percent, 30 percent, 40 percent, 50 percent, and greater than 50 percent from normal reliability conditions. Table 4-1 (DWR Table 8-1) lists the standard water shortage levels for the City. The water shortage levels and corresponding response actions adopted by the City apply to both foreseeable water supply shortages, such as drought or regulatory curtailments, and unforeseeable supply interruptions, including infrastructure failures or other emergency conditions.
761
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
10 Table 4-1 – WSCP Levels (DWR Table 8-1)
Submittal Table 8-1: Cross-reference for Standard vs Supplier Shortage Levels Water Code Section 10632(a)(3)(B)
Check the box if the Supplier uses the Standard six levels of water shortage.
Proceed to the next table.
Standard
Shortage Levels
Percent Shortage
Range
Suppliers
Shortage Levels Percent Shortage Range
1 Up to 10% N/A N/A
2 Up to 20% N/A N/A
3 Up to 30% N/A N/A
4 Up to 40% N/A N/A
5 Up to 50% N/A N/A
6 >50% N/A N/A
NOTES:
762
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
11 5 Shortage Response Actions
Legal Requirements:
Water Code Section 10632 (a)(4)
Shortage response actions that align with the defined shortage levels and include, at a minimum, all of the following:
(A) Locally appropriate supply augmentation actions.
(B) Locally appropriate demand reduction actions to adequately respond to shortages. (C) Locally appropriate operational changes.
(D) Additional, mandatory prohibitions against specific water use practices that are in addition to statemandated prohibitions and appropriate to the local conditions. (E) For each action, an estimate of the extent to which the gap between supplies and demand will be reduced by implementation of the action.
Water Code Section 10632.2
An urban water supplier shall follow, where feasible and appropriate, the prescribed procedures and implement determined shortage response actions in its water shortage contingency plan, as identified in subdivision (a) of Section 10632, or reasonable alternative actions, provided that descriptions of the alternative actions are submitted with the annual water shortage assessment report pursuant to Section 10632.1. Nothing in this section prohibits an urban water supplier from taking actions not specified in its water shortage contingency plan, if needed, without having to formally amend its urban water management plan or water shortage contingency plan.
CWC Section 10632(a)(4) requires shortage response actions that align with the shortage levels defined in Table 4-1 (DWR Table 8-1) and include locally appropriate supply augmentation actions, demand reduction actions, operational changes, and additional mandatory prohibitions against specific water use practices. An estimate of the extent to which the gap between supplies and demand will be reduced by implementation of the actions must be provided.
The City intends to implement a balanced and flexible approach to water shortage response, integrating demand reduction, supply augmentation, and operational adjustments to address the identified water supply shortfall and the associated shortage level. Response actions will be selected and implemented to reduce the gap between available water supplies and projected demands and to achieve the water use reduction objectives associated with the declared water shortage level.
The City relies on system-wide water metering to monitor water production and customer water use and to evaluate the effectiveness of shortage response actions. The water system is fully metered, allowing the City to compare current water use to historical use and to establish demand reduction targets.
Water production and customer water use may be evaluated by customer sector or individual account and compared to prior periods to assess trends and compliance with demand reduction goals. This 763
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
12 ongoing monitoring allows the City to adjust shortage response actions, as needed, to balance water demands with available supplies. For example, the City may increase public outreach efforts or increase enforcement of water use restrictions if demand reduction targets are not being met. Conversely, outreach frequency or enforcement intensity may be reduced if demand reductions exceed established targets.
The shortage response actions described in subsequent sections are intended to provide the City with a range of tools to respond effectively to water shortage conditions. Response actions are initiated at the shortage levels identified. Because the City may continuously monitor conditions and adjust response actions over time, the extent to which individual actions reduce the gap between water supply and demand may be difficult to quantify precisely and is therefore provided as an estimate. Certain response actions, such as public outreach, education, and enforcement, support the effectiveness of other measures and may not have a directly quantifiable water savings when implemented independently.
5.1 Supply Augmentation Actions
The City’s supply augmentation actions are focused on long-term strategies for increasing reliability by utilizing and procuring other sources of water. Table 5-1 (DWR Table 8-2 Retail) lists these long-term strategies. Because these are long-term strategies which have yet to be implemented, they are considered to have no effect on reducing a short-term shortage gap. Short-term shortage gaps will primarily be satisfied by demand reduction actions described in the next section. 764
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
13 Table 5-1 – Supply Augmentation and Other Actions (DWR Table 8-2 Retail) Submittal Table 8-2 Retail: Supply Augmentation and Other Actions Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(A),(C) and (E)
Yes Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) Shortage
Level
Supply Augmentation
Methods and Other
Actions by Water
Supplier
Drop down list
These are the only categories
that will be accepted by the
WUEdata online submittal tool
How much is this going to
reduce the shortage gap?
Additional Explanation or
Reference
(OPTIONAL) Volume or
Percentage
Drop down
Shortage Gap
Reduction
Value
(May be a range)
(%)
Add additional rows as needed
1-6 Transfers Percentage 1-10
OID supplies non-potable
water to City parks. In the
future, the City may augment
its water supply with surface
water. However, this is not
planned to occur in the near
future.
1-6 Other Actions Percentage 1-10
Additional wells (Well 11 &
12) are planned for
construction in 2028.
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES:
5.2 Demand Reduction Actions
During water shortage conditions, the City will reduce customer water demand through implementation of the demand reduction actions identified in Table 5-2 (DWR Table 8-3 Retail). Demand reduction actions are organized by water shortage level, and each action includes an estimate of the extent to which its implementation is expected to reduce the gap between available water supply and projected demand.
For each demand reduction action, Table 5-2 (DWR Table 8-3 Retail) also identifies whether compliance measures, such as penalties, charges, or other enforcement mechanisms, may be applied. 765
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
14 Table 5-2 – Demand Reduction Actions (DWR Table 8-3) Submittal Table 8-3 Retail: Demand Reduction Actions
Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(B) and (E)
Yes Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) Shortage
Level
Demand Reduction
Actions
Drop down list
These are the only
categories that will be
accepted by the
WUEdata online
submittal tool. Select
those that apply.
How much is this going to
reduce the shortage gap?
Additional Explanation
or Reference
(OPTIONAL)
Penalty,
Charge, or
Other
Enforcement?
For Retail Suppliers
Only
Drop Down List
Volume or
Percentage
Drop down
Shortage
Gap
Reduction
Value
(May be a
range)
Add additional rows as needed
1 Expand Public
Information
Campaign
Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
Initial public outreach
campaign to encourage
water conservation.
No
1 Landscape – Limit
landscape irrigation
to specific times
Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
No lawn/garden
watering, or other
outdoor use will be
allowed between the
hours of 12 noon to 7:00
pm every day.
Yes
1 Landscape – Limit
landscape irrigation
to specific days
Volume 24.75 gpcd Three-day watering
schedule. Yes
2 CII – Restaurants
may only serve
water upon request
Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
Service of water by any
restaurant except upon
request of a patron.
Yes
2 Other Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
Limit washing of cars
and boats to one day
per week.
Yes
2 Water Features –
Restrict water use
for decorative water
features, such as
fountains
Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
No use of water to
clean, fill, or maintain
levels in decorative
fountains.
Yes
766
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
15 Submittal Table 8-3 Retail: Demand Reduction Actions Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(B) and (E)
Yes Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) Shortage
Level
Demand Reduction
Actions
Drop down list
These are the only
categories that will be
accepted by the
WUEdata online
submittal tool. Select
those that apply.
How much is this going to
reduce the shortage gap?
Additional Explanation
or Reference
(OPTIONAL)
Penalty,
Charge, or
Other
Enforcement?
For Retail Suppliers
Only
Drop Down List
Volume or
Percentage
Drop down
Shortage
Gap
Reduction
Value
(May be a
range)
2 Other water feature
or swimming pool
restriction
Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
Initial filling of
swimming pools or
otherwise of the full
capacity of a pool over
2,500 gallons is
prohibited. Emptying
and refilling all pools is
prohibited.
Yes
2 Other – Customers
must repair leaks,
breaks, and
malfunctions in a
timely manner
Volume 3-6 gpcd
Indoor leaks will be
repaired within 7 days
of notification by the
City.
Yes
3 Landscape – Limit
landscape irrigation
to specific days
Volume 24.75 gpcd Two-day watering
schedule. Yes
4 Other – Prohibit use
of potable water for
construction and
dust control
Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
Construction water for
soil compaction, backfill,
or dust control shall be
from a non-potable
source.
Yes
4 Other Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
No private washing of
cars or boats. Yes
4 Other Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
No water for street
cleaning. Yes
4 Other Volume Supports
other
Enact conservation
measures as needed to Yes
767
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
16 Submittal Table 8-3 Retail: Demand Reduction Actions Water Code Section 10632(a)(4)(B) and (E)
Yes Is the Supplier completing this table using the standard six levels? (yes/no) Shortage
Level
Demand Reduction
Actions
Drop down list
These are the only
categories that will be
accepted by the
WUEdata online
submittal tool. Select
those that apply.
How much is this going to
reduce the shortage gap?
Additional Explanation
or Reference
(OPTIONAL)
Penalty,
Charge, or
Other
Enforcement?
For Retail Suppliers
Only
Drop Down List
Volume or
Percentage
Drop down
Shortage
Gap
Reduction
Value
(May be a
range)
demand
reduction
actions
achieve reductions as
mandated.
5 Landscape – Limit
landscape irrigation
to specific days
Volume 24.75 gpcd One-day watering
schedule. Yes
6 Landscape – Prohibit
all landscape
irrigation
Volume 24.75 gpcd
No outdoor landscape
irrigation using potable
water.
Yes
6 CII – Lodging
establishment must
offer opt out of linen
service
Volume
Supports
other
demand
reduction
actions
Offers guests in hotels,
motels, and other
commercial lodging
establishments the
option of not laundering
towels and linens daily.
Yes
DWR NOTES: Units of measure (AF, CCF, MG) must remain consistent throughout the UWMP as reported in Submittal Table 2-3.
NOTES: After a notice of intention to impose a penalty is served, a penalty shall be assessed to the utility account. For the first violation, the consumer shall be issued an administrative citation in the amount of $50. For the second violation, the consumer shall be issued an administrative citation in the amount of $75. For the third violation, the consumer shall be issued an administrative citation in the amount of $100. For the fourth and any subsequent violations, the consumer shall be issued an administrative citation in the amount of $200. The penalty shall be subject to collection in the same manner as any unpaid water service charges.
Water use reduction associated with reducing landscape irrigation by one day was estimated by comparing the average water use for the three lowest months of each year with the annual average water use for the year on a per capita basis for 2021 – 2025, and assuming that outdoor water use was occurring four days per week. The overall difference between outdoor water use and baseline water use was divided by four to estimate landscape irrigation water use per day. Tables 5-3 and 5-4 summarize the calculations for estimating the impacts of the demand reduction actions. 768
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
17 Table 5-3 – Historical Water Production Data
Water Pumped (Million Gallons (MG))
Year
Month # of days 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
January 31 70.5 68.9 60.7 63.3 60.8
February 28 64.7 87.2 57.9 57.1 57.9
March 31 91.3 118.5 59.8 72.3 77.7
April 30 155.4 125.0 102.7 85.6 113.7
May 31 195.8 208.0 165.8 162.4 174.2
June 30 206.5 188.1 190.9 204.9 194.6
July 31 221.4 205.1 235.0 227.3 212.3
August 31 215.4 203.4 216.5 221.2 209.2
September 30 190.5 176.8 172.4 198.2 183.2
October 31 136.5 155.3 143.2 179.6 120.2
November 30 76.7 86.2 98.9 101.2 82.6
December 31 70.8 65.0 66.7 77.2 71.0
Total 1,695.4 1,687.6 1,570.5 1,650.2 1,557.3
Population a 23,210 23,137 23,014 23,167 23,132
Average water use, gpcd 200 200 187 195 184
5-year average water use, gpcd 193
Baseline water use(lowest 3 months), MG 206.1 220.1 178.4 192.7 189.7 Baseline, gpcd 99 103 86 92 91
5-year baseline water use, gpcd 94
Estimated outdoor water use, gpcd 101 96 101 103 93
5-year average outdoor water use, gpcd 99
a
Service area population is defined as the population served by the distribution system. 2021-2024 City of Oakdale population data is from the California Department of Finance, Table E-5. 2025 Population is based on the Stanislaus County Demographic and Employment Forecast 2025 prepared by the University of the Pacific Center for Business and Policy Research.
Table 5-4 – Shortage Gap Estimates
# Description Value
(1) Average outdoor water use (4-day watering schedule), gpcd 99.0 (2) Reduction in Shortage Gap by one day reduction in watering schedule, gpcd 24.75 Notes:
(1) Average outdoor water use (4-day watering schedule) = Average outdoor water use from Table 5-3. (2) Reduction in Shortage Gap by one day reduction in watering schedule = (1) ÷ 4, rounded.
5.3 Operational Changes
During a water shortage at any declared level, the City may implement operational measures to support effective implementation of this WSCP. Operational changes may include, but are not limited to:
• Expand public information campaign.
• Offer water use surveys.
769
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
18 • Increase water waste patrols.
In addition, the City may implement operational adjustments intended to reduce non-essential water use, such as limiting routine water main flushing activities where operationally feasible and restricting potable water use for fire department training drills, consistent with public health and safety requirements.
Operational changes will be evaluated at each water shortage level to determine the appropriateness, timing, and duration of implementation, based on prevailing water supply conditions, operational needs, and system reliability considerations.
5.4 Additional Mandatory Prohibitions
Article VI, Water Conservation Program, in Chapter 35 Section 48 of the Oakdale Municipal Code (OMC) includes the following mandatory prohibitions for all users:
1. No lawn/garden watering, or other outdoor use will be allowed between the hours of 12 noon to 7:00 pm every day.
2. Dwellings or establishments with odd numbered street addresses shall use outdoor water only on Mondays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Sundays.
3. Dwellings or establishments with even numbered street addresses shall use outdoor water only on Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays.
4. No watering lawns or gardens such that excess water leaves the property or area being watered.
5. No watering outdoor landscaping while raining.
6. No washing vehicles, equipment or boats, during restricted days or hours and/or using hoses without automatic shut-offs.
7. No hosing down of concrete or asphalt curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways or slabs.
8. Having leaky faucets or plumbing fixtures on the premises is prohibited.
While the OMC establishes enforceable water-waste prohibitions applicable at all times, formal water shortage levels and associated response actions are defined in this WSCP pursuant to CWC Section 10632.
5.5 Emergency Response Plan
The water shortage levels described in Section 4 apply to both foreseeable and unforeseeable water supply shortage conditions, including catastrophic water supply emergencies.
The City maintains an Emergency Response Plan (ERP) to address catastrophic and unanticipated water supply disruptions. Emergency response activities related to water supply shortages are coordinated, as appropriate, with the Stanislaus County Office of Emergency Services. The ERP outlines response procedures for a range of unforeseen incidents, including but not limited to water supply contamination, seismic events, major infrastructure failures, and other emergencies that may disrupt water system operations.
The ERP identifies actions to be implemented in advance of, during, and following emergency events to support continuity of service, protect public health and safety, and facilitate system recovery. For security and operational reasons, the ERP is maintained as a confidential document and is not included as an appendix to this WSCP.
770
City of Oakdale
Water Shortage Contingency Plan
May 2026
19 5.6 Seismic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plan
Legal Requirements:
Water Code Section 10632.5
(a) In addition to the requirements of paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) of Section 10632, beginning January 1, 2020, the plan shall include a seismic risk assessment and mitigation plan to assess the vulnerability of each of the various facilities of a water system and mitigate those vulnerabilities. (b) An urban water supplier shall update the seismic risk assessment and mitigation plan when updating its urban water management plan as required by Section 10621. (c) An urban water supplier may comply with this section by submitting, pursuant to Section 10644, a copy of the most recent adopted local hazard mitigation plan or multihazard mitigation plan under the federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-390) if the local hazard mitigation plan or multihazard mitigation plan addresses seismic risk.
CWC Section 10632.5(a) requires UWMPs to include a seismic risk assessment and mitigation plan to evaluate and address a water system’s potential seismic vulnerabilities. This requirement may be satisfied by incorporating an adopted Local Hazard Mitigation Plan or a Risk and Resilience Assessment, provided the document addresses seismic risk.
The City is located within Stanislaus County and is included within the 2022 County’s MJHMP. A copy of the 2022 MJHMP is included in Appendix A. The plan is a multi-jurisdictional plan that covers the City of Ceres, Hughson, Modesto, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, Turlock, Waterford, and the County Office of Education. The plan addresses seismic risk and satisfies the requirement of CWC Section 10632.5(a).
5.7 Shortage Response Action Effectiveness
The effectiveness of the City’s shortage response actions will be evaluated through ongoing monitoring of water supply conditions, customer water use, and compliance with adopted water use restrictions.
Because water shortage conditions may result from a variety of foreseeable and unforeseeable circumstances, the effectiveness of individual response actions may vary depending on the severity, duration, timing, and cause of the shortage.
The City will use water production and customer water use data collected through its metered water system to compare actual water use against projected demands and the demand reduction targets associated with each declared water shortage level.