Agenda packet — Ontario City Council, November 19, 2024 (part 17 of 31)

expanding capacity and sourcing this amount of material creates massive environmental effects, that in some respects could exceed the emissions of current clean-diesel trucks.17 An EIR must describe feasible measures that could minimize the project's significant adverse impacts. 14 Cal Code Regs §15126.4(a)(1). An EIR may decline to propose a mitigation measure that would not effectively address a significant impact. An EIR also need not identify and discuss mitigation measures that are infeasible. Nor must an EIR analyze in detail mitigation measures it concludes are infeasible.

Further, SCAQMD recently adopted a Warehouse Indirect Source Rule, Rule 2305, in May 2021. Rule 2305 applies to warehouse operators and owners of warehouses greater than or equal to 100,000 square feet of indoor floor space within a single building that may be used for warehousing activities. The Project includes the development of 270,337 sf speculative warehouse and office building and would be subject to compliance with Rule 2305. Since the proposed Project will not be operated by the current owner, it is not feasible to commit to specific provisions of Rule 2305; however, future tenants will be obligated to comply with its provisions. In general, the Rule establishes the Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE) Program, which is a points system that is based upon the actual number of trucks that come to and leave the warehouse. Each year the operator will be obligated to determine how many points the warehouse is required to achieve using a formula set out in the Rule. If the required number of points are not achieved, the warehouse operator would be required to pay a fee to the SCAQMD, which would use collected funds to improve air quality.

Although compliance with Rule 2305 is not mitigation and the SCAQMD has not published a nexus study showing how the use of collected funds has nexus to the warehouse’s air quality impacts, the program is intended to reduce air quality effects associated with the warehouse industry, including the Project, throughout the Air Basin. Compliance with Rule 2305 would reduce air quality effects associated with the warehouse industry, including the Project, throughout the air basin, although quantification of such reductions is not feasible at this time.

Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-54 The commenter requests to require all on-site motorized operational equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be zero-emission with the necessary charging or fueling stations provided. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-55 The commenter requests mitigation to require tenants to use zero-emission light- and mediumduty vehicles as part of business operations. Refer to response to Comment B-53 regarding the feasibility of using zero-emission vehicles.
17 Id.
3067
5355 East Airport Drive Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Lead Agency: City of Ontario SCH No. 2022090006

Page 2 ends

B-56 The commenter requests mitigation to forbid trucks from idling for more than three minutes and requiring operators to turn off engines when not in use. The Project shall comply with California Code of Regulations Title 13, Division 3, Chapter 10, Article 1, Section 2485, “Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel‐Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling, limits nonessential idling to five minutes or less for commercial trucks. Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-57 The commenter requests to post both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the local air district, and the building manager. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2- 32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-58 The commenter requests installation of solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation capacity that is equal to or greater than the building’s projected energy needs, including all electrical chargers. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-59 The commenter request to design all project building roofs to accommodate the maximum future coverage of solar panels and installing the maximum solar power generation capacity feasible. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-60 The commenter requests that the Project construct zero-emission truck charging/fueling stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project. As stated in response to Comment B-53 requiring zero-emission vehicles is currently technologically infeasible; also, such vehicles are not available on a large enough scale to be relied upon. Therefore, the current technology required for EV truck charging stations is unknown and technologically infeasible.

Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-61 The commenter requests that the Project run conduit to designated locations for future electric truck charging stations. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.
3068
5355 East Airport Drive Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Lead Agency: City of Ontario SCH No. 2022090006

Page 2 ends

B-62 The commenter request that unless the owner of the facility records a covenant on the title of the underlying property ensuring that the property cannot be used to provide refrigerated warehouse space, constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door and requiring truck operators with transport refrigeration units to use the electric plugs when at loading docks. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-63 The commenter requests mitigation to oversize electrical rooms by 25 percent or providing a secondary electrical room to accommodate future expansion of electric vehicle charging capability. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-64 The commenter requests the Project construct and maintain electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of employee parking spaces (for example, requiring at least 10% of all employee parking spaces to be equipped with electric vehicle charging stations of at least Level 2 charging performance). As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Additionally, of the 251 onsite passenger vehicle spaces, 25 would be designated as electric vehicle parking stalls (Refer to Draft EIR p. 3-6). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-65 The commenter requests the Project run conduit to an additional proportion of employee parking spaces for a future increase in the number of electric light-duty charging stations. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp.

4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-66 The commenter requests the installation and maintenance, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, of air filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the project. As discussed in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, the nearest maximally exposed individual receptor to the Project site is Location R6 which is located approximately 8,840 feet northwest of the Project Site at an existing residence located at 11210 Fourth Street on the opposite side of I-15 and I-10 from the Project Site. As concluded in Table 4.2-10, Localized Construction-Source Emissions Summary, construction of the Project would not result in the exposure of any sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations (refer to Draft EIR p. 4.2-33). Similarly, Table 4.2-11, Localized OperationalSource Emissions Summary, concluded that operational emissions would not exceed the 3069
5355 East Airport Drive Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Lead Agency: City of Ontario SCH No. 2022090006

Page 2 ends

SCAQMD’s localized significant thresholds at the maximally impacted receptor location. (refer to Draft EIR p. 4.2-34). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-67 The commenter requests the installation and maintenance, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, an air monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project, and making the resulting data publicly available in real time.

As stated above in response to Comment B-66, the Project would not result in significant air quality related health risk impacts during construction or operation, therefore additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-68 The commenter requests mitigation to require all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel. Emergency generators would only be used in emergency power failure or for routine testing and maintenance. Such intermittent use would not a substantial amount of emissions, since by the very nature of the activity, it would be short-term, intermittent, and infrequent. Requiring that emergency generators to be powered by non-diesel fuel would not result in a significant reduction in air quality emission impacts. Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-69 The commenter requests facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks. Refer to response to Comment B-56 for a detailed discussion on idling of trucks and response to Comment B-74 regarding directional signs to truck routes. Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-70 The commenter requests mitigation to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages single occupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation, including carpooling, public transit, and biking. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2- 32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-71 The commenter requests Project buildings meet CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Additionally, of the 251 onsite passenger vehicle spaces, 25 would be designated as electric vehicle parking stalls. Bike racks would also be provided near the building entrances and adjacent to the electrical room (Refer to Draft EIR p. 3-6). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.
3070
5355 East Airport Drive Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Lead Agency: City of Ontario SCH No. 2022090006

Page 2 ends

B-72 The commenter requests the Project design buildings to LEED green building certification standards. As discussed in Section 3.0, Project Description, of the Draft EIR, the Project building would be conditioned by the City of Ontario to achieve LEED standards (Refer to Draft EIR p. 3-2). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-73 The commenter requests mitigation requiring meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-74 The commenter requests mitigation to post signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to 4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-75 The commenter requests that the Project Applicant improve and maintain vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project area in order to reduce air quality and GHG emissions. Improving and maintaining vegetation and the tree canopy for residents in and around the Project site would not have any effect on reducing the Project’s air quality and GHG emissions. Therefore, this measure is not warranted. However, the Project would provide extensive landscape on the Project site. As depicted on Figure 3-6, Proposed Landscape Plan, the Project would include 72,527 (12.72%) square feet of landscaping. Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-76 The commenter requests that the Project Applicant require that every tenant (1) train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses; and (2) require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. The Project would be subject to compliance with SCAQMD Rule 2305. As part of Rule 2305, facilities would be required to report information about facility operations to SCAQMD each year and recordkeeping of onsite operations. Therefore, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-77 The commenter requests that the Project Applicant require tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program, and requiring tenants who own, operate, or hire trucking carriers with more than 100 trucks to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers. The US EPA SmartWay Program is a voluntary public-private program. The Project Applicant or City cannot control the types of trucks coming to the Project site. Because building occupants/tenants are not yet identified, it is highly speculative to assume that the building occupants/tenants will own or control a fleet of trucks. The large majority of warehouses are 3071
5355 East Airport Drive Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Lead Agency: City of Ontario SCH No. 2022090006

Page 2 ends

served by contracted trucking companies and independent drivers and the building occupant/tenant may have no control over the truck engine type, in which case the building occupant/tenant would need to comply with Rule 2305’s requirements through a suite of equivalent measures or payment of the required fee to reduce Air Quality impacts as required by the Rule. Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-78 The commenter requests to provide tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets. As concluded in Section 4.2, Air Quality, of the Draft EIR, Project operation-source emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance for any criteria pollutants even when not taking into account of existing development emissions (Refer to Draft EIR pp. 4.2-31 to

4.2-32). Thus, the City determines that additional mitigation is not warranted.

B-79 The commenter makes a concluding, conclusory comment that the suggested mitigation measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation. Refer to response to Comments B-41 to B-78 for a detailed discussion on the suggested mitigation measures.

The commenter also emphasizes the applicability of incorporating solar power system into the Project design as it is policy of the State that eligible renewable energy resources and zerocarbon resources supply 100% of retail sales of electricity to California end-use customers by December 31, 2045. Refer to response to Comment B-58 related to solar photovoltaic systems onsite. Thus, no further response is required.

B-80 The commenter states that a revised Draft EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures and include updated air quality analysis to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. Refer to response to Comments B-41 to B-78 for a detailed discussion on the suggested mitigation measures. Applicable mitigation measures have been incorporated to the Project at the commenter’s request.

B-81 The commenter provides disclaimer remarks about the comment letter. This comment does not raise any issues concerning or relating to the adequacy of the environmental analysis provided in the Draft EIR and thus no further response is required. 3072
5355 East Airport Drive Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Lead Agency: City of Ontario SCH No. 2022090006

Page 2 ends

This page intentionally left blank.
3073
5355 East Airport Drive Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Lead Agency: City of Ontario SCH No. 2022090006

Page 3 ends

SECTION 3.0 CLARIFICATIONS AND REVISIONS
Corrections to the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) text generated either from responses to comments or independently by the City, are stated in this section of the Final EIR. The information included in this section does not constitute substantial new information that requires recirculation of the Draft EIR. Section 15088.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines states in part:
(a) A lead agency is required to recirculate an EIR when significant new information is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of the draft EIR for public review under Section 15087 but before certification. As used in this section, the term “information” can include changes in the project or environmental setting as well as additional data or other information. New information added to an EIR is not “significant” unless the EIR is changed in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect (including a feasible project alternative) that the project’s proponents have declined to implement. “Significant new information” requiring recirculation includes, for example, a disclosure showing that:
(1) A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure proposed to be implemented.
(2) A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance.
(3) A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project, but the project’s proponents decline to adopt it.
(4) The draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded. (b) Recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR.

None of the information contained in this section constitutes significant new information or changes to the analysis or conclusions of the Draft EIR. There were no new significant environmental impacts identified following circulation of the Draft EIR. Likewise, there were no substantial increases in the severity of environmental impacts identified after circulation of the Draft EIR. Therefore, recirculation of the Draft EIR is not required because no new information was added to the EIR. 3074
5355 East Airport Drive Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
Lead Agency: City of Ontario SCH No. 2022090006

Page 3 ends

CLARIFICATIONS AND REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT EIR
This section includes recommended clarifications and revisions to the Draft EIR. This section is organized by respective sections of the Draft EIR. Deleted text is shown as strikeout and new text is underlined.

Section 4.1.2

1. Page 4-2 is hereby modified in response to Comment A-13.

The summary of projections approach is used in this EIR., except for the evaluation of cumulative transportation effects (for purposes of demonstrating General Plan policy compliance) and vehicular related air quality, greenhouse gas, and noise impacts, for which the analysis combines the summary of projections approach with the manual addition of past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects (“combined approach”). The City determined the combined approach to be appropriate because long range planning documents contain a sufficient amount of information to enable an analysis of cumulative effect for all subject areas, with the exception of transportation (and vehicular-related air quality, greenhouse gas, and noise effects), which requires a greater level of detailed study. With the combined approach, the cumulative impact analyses for the air quality, greenhouse gas, noise, and transportation issue areas overstate the Project’s potential cumulatively considerable impacts relative to analyses that rely solely on the list of projects approach or solely on the summary of projections approach; therefore, the combined approach provides a conservative, “worst-case” analysis for the Project’s cumulative air quality, greenhouse gas, noise, and transportation impacts.

For the cumulative impact analyses that rely on the summary projections approach (i.e., all issue areas with the exception of transportation and vehicular-related air quality, greenhouse gas, and noise – as described above), tThe cumulative study area primarily includes the City of Ontario, City of Fontana, City of Upland, City of Chino, City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Jurupa Valley, and small portions of unincorporated San Bernardino County. These jurisdictions encompass the southwestern area of San Bernardino County and nearby portion of Riverside County and have similar environmental characteristics as the Project area. 3075
19 Attachment A: Updated Construction Schedule
Attachment B: Updated CalEEMod Output Files
Attachment C: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment D: Paul Rosenfeld CV
3076
Phase
Default Phase
Length
Construction
Duration %
Construction
Duration
Revised Phase
Length
Demolition 20 559 0.0358 351 13
Site Preparation 10 559 0.0179 351 6
Grading 30 559 0.0537 351 19
Construction 300 559 0.5367 351 188
Paving 20 559 0.0358 351 13
Architectural Coating 20 559 0.0358 351 13
Total Default
Construction
Duration
Revised
Construction
Duration
Start Date 5/2/2023 5/2/2023
End Date 11/11/2024 4/17/2024
Total Days 559 351
Construction Schedule Calculations
Attachment A
3077
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction)
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual
Project Characteristics - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Land Use - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths" Grading - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Trips and VMT - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Architectural Coating - See SWAPE Comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Architectural Coating Emission Factors" Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on "Incorrect Application of Tier 4 Interim Mitigation"

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 243.00 1000sqft 7.08 243,303.00 0 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 27.00 1000sqft 0.79 27,000.00 0 Parking Lot 299.00 Space 1.53 119,600.00 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 161.00 1000sqft 3.68 161,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Attachment B
3078
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3079
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 188.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 19.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 6.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/11/2024 4/17/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/16/2024 3/12/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/29/2023 5/18/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/24/2023 6/22/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/14/2024 3/29/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/12/2023 5/26/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/15/2024 3/30/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/25/2023 6/23/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/13/2023 5/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/17/2024 3/13/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/30/2023 5/19/2023 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 243,000.00 243,303.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.58 7.08
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.62 0.79
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.69 1.53
tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.70 3.68
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 38.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3080

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 90.00 25.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 18.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 231.00 114.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 46.00 23.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3081

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1964 1.6412 1.9050 4.1900e0030.2751 0.0727 0.3478 0.0996 0.0679 0.1675 0.0000 373.7245 373.7245 0.0669 8.9100e003378.0538 2024 1.3575 0.4600 0.6562 1.3900e0030.0504 0.0199 0.0702 0.0135 0.0186 0.0321 0.0000 124.6714 124.6714 0.0197 3.1800e003126.1120 Maximum 1.3575 1.6412 1.9050 4.1900e0030.2751 0.0727 0.3478 0.0996 0.0679 0.1675 0.0000 373.7245 373.7245 0.0669 8.9100e003378.0538 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2023 0.1377 2.5149 2.1450 4.1900e0030.2751 0.0841 0.3592 0.0996 0.0841 0.1836 0.0000 373.7242 373.7242 0.0669 8.9100e003378.0535 2024 1.3465 0.7991 0.7181 1.3900e0030.0504 0.0289 0.0793 0.0135 0.0289 0.0424 0.0000 124.6713 124.6713 0.0197 3.1800e003126.1119 Maximum 1.3465 2.5149 2.1450 4.1900e0030.2751 0.0841 0.3592 0.0996 0.0841 0.1836 0.0000 373.7242 373.7242 0.0669 8.9100e003378.0535 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3082
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

4.48 -57.72 -11.79 0.00 0.00 -22.19 -4.92 0.00 -30.49 -13.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 5-2-2023 8-1-2023 0.8599 1.2059
2 8-2-2023 11-1-2023 0.5912 0.8764
3 11-2-2023 2-1-2024 0.5800 0.8771
4 2-2-2024 5-1-2024 1.6719 1.8820
Highest 1.6719 1.8820

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 1.1249 8.0000e0059.2900e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 0.0181 0.0181 5.0000e0050.0000 0.0193 Energy 0.0102 0.0924 0.0777 5.5000e0047.0300e0037.0300e0037.0300e0037.0300e0030.0000 398.9265 398.9265 0.0271 4.9000e003401.0633 Mobile 0.2689 0.4550 3.0211 7.1300e0030.7757 5.6400e0030.7814 0.2072 5.2800e0030.2125 0.0000 675.3712 675.3712 0.0350 0.0320 685.7892 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 51.5191 0.0000 51.5191 3.0447 0.0000 127.6364 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19.8085 144.1817 163.9902 2.0467 0.0495 229.9130 Total 1.4040 0.5475 3.1080 7.6800e0030.7757 0.0127 0.7884 0.2072 0.0123 0.2195 71.3277 1,218.497 5 1,289.825
1 5.1535 0.0864 1,444.421
2 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3083

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3084
4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/23/2023 3/12/2024 5 188 5 Paving Paving 3/13/2024 3/29/2024 5 13
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/30/2024 4/17/2024 5 13 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 405,455; Non-Residential Outdoor: 135,152; Striped Parking Area:
16,836 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 9
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 57
Acres of Paving: 5.21
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3085

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0148 0.1397 0.1277 2.5000e0046.4800e0036.4800e0036.0300e0036.0300e0030.0000 22.0948 22.0948 6.1900e0030.0000 22.2495 Total 0.0148 0.1397 0.1277 2.5000e0046.4800e0036.4800e0036.0300e0036.0300e0030.0000 22.0948 22.0948 6.1900e0030.0000 22.2495 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 18.00 0.00 3.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 5.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 5.00 38.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 114.00 25.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 23.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3086

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 1.7000e0045.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0051.0000e0050.0000 1.0000e0050.0000 0.0834 0.0834 0.0000 1.0000e0050.0874 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.7000e0043.7000e0044.6300e0031.0000e0051.6100e0031.0000e0051.6200e0034.3000e0041.0000e0054.4000e0040.0000 1.2556 1.2556 3.0000e0053.0000e0051.2660 Total 4.7000e0045.4000e0044.6800e0031.0000e0051.6400e0031.0000e0051.6500e0034.4000e0041.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.3390 1.3390 3.0000e0054.0000e0051.3534 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 8.2000e0030.2123 0.1604 2.5000e0045.9400e0035.9400e0035.9400e0035.9400e0030.0000 22.0948 22.0948 6.1900e0030.0000 22.2495 Total 8.2000e0030.2123 0.1604 2.5000e0045.9400e0035.9400e0035.9400e0035.9400e0030.0000 22.0948 22.0948 6.1900e0030.0000 22.2495 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3087

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.0000e0057.2000e0042.5000e0040.0000 1.4000e0041.0000e0051.5000e0044.0000e0051.0000e0055.0000e0050.0000 0.3741 0.3741 1.0000e0056.0000e0050.3908 Worker 2.2000e0041.7000e0042.1400e0031.0000e0057.5000e0040.0000 7.5000e0042.0000e0040.0000 2.0000e0040.0000 0.5795 0.5795 1.0000e0052.0000e0050.5843 Total 2.4000e0048.9000e0042.3900e0031.0000e0058.9000e0041.0000e0059.0000e0042.4000e0041.0000e0052.5000e0040.0000 0.9536 0.9536 2.0000e0058.0000e0050.9751 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0590 0.0000 0.0590 0.0303 0.0000 0.0303 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6300e0030.1012 0.0689 1.1000e0042.8400e0032.8400e0032.8400e0032.8400e0030.0000 10.0352 10.0352 3.2500e0030.0000 10.1163 Total 3.6300e0030.1012 0.0689 1.1000e0040.0590 2.8400e0030.0618 0.0303 2.8400e0030.0332 0.0000 10.0352 10.0352 3.2500e0030.0000 10.1163 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3089

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0874 0.0000 0.0874 0.0347 0.0000 0.0347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0316 0.3279 0.2665 5.9000e0040.0135 0.0135 0.0125 0.0125 0.0000 51.8085 51.8085 0.0168 0.0000 52.2274 Total 0.0316 0.3279 0.2665 5.9000e0040.0874 0.0135 0.1010 0.0347 0.0125 0.0472 0.0000 51.8085 51.8085 0.0168 0.0000 52.2274 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3090

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 4.0000e0052.2100e0036.4000e0041.0000e0053.3000e0042.0000e0053.5000e0049.0000e0052.0000e0051.1000e0040.0000 1.0558 1.0558 4.0000e0051.7000e0041.1068 Vendor 6.0000e0052.2900e0038.0000e0041.0000e0054.4000e0042.0000e0054.6000e0041.3000e0042.0000e0051.5000e0040.0000 1.1846 1.1846 3.0000e0051.7000e0041.2374 Worker 7.7000e0046.0000e0047.5200e0032.0000e0052.6200e0031.0000e0052.6300e0037.0000e0041.0000e0057.1000e0040.0000 2.0390 2.0390 5.0000e0055.0000e0052.0560 Total 8.7000e0045.1000e0038.9600e0034.0000e0053.3900e0035.0000e0053.4400e0039.2000e0045.0000e0059.7000e0040.0000 4.2794 4.2794 1.2000e0043.9000e0044.4002 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0874 0.0000 0.0874 0.0347 0.0000 0.0347 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0172 0.4868 0.3489 5.9000e0040.0127 0.0127 0.0127 0.0127 0.0000 51.8084 51.8084 0.0168 0.0000 52.2273 Total 0.0172 0.4868 0.3489 5.9000e0040.0874 0.0127 0.1001 0.0347 0.0127 0.0474 0.0000 51.8084 51.8084 0.0168 0.0000 52.2273 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3091

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1070 0.9782 1.1046 1.8300e0030.0476 0.0476 0.0448 0.0448 0.0000 157.6272 157.6272 0.0375 0.0000 158.5647 Total 0.1070 0.9782 1.1046 1.8300e0030.0476 0.0476 0.0448 0.0448 0.0000 157.6272 157.6272 0.0375 0.0000 158.5647 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3092

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.2300e0030.0821 0.0286 4.4000e0040.0158 6.6000e0040.0165 4.5700e0036.3000e0045.1900e0030.0000 42.3946 42.3946 1.1000e0036.2500e00344.2846 Worker 0.0313 0.0243 0.3069 9.0000e0040.1070 5.3000e0040.1075 0.0284 4.9000e0040.0289 0.0000 83.1922 83.1922 1.9500e0032.1500e00383.8827 Total 0.0336 0.1064 0.3355 1.3400e0030.1228 1.1900e0030.1240 0.0330 1.1200e0030.0341 0.0000 125.5868 125.5868 3.0500e0038.4000e003128.1673 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0735 1.6017 1.2154 1.8300e0030.0614 0.0614 0.0614 0.0614 0.0000 157.6270 157.6270 0.0375 0.0000 158.5645 Total 0.0735 1.6017 1.2154 1.8300e0030.0614 0.0614 0.0614 0.0614 0.0000 157.6270 157.6270 0.0375 0.0000 158.5645 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3093

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0383 0.3495 0.4203 7.0000e0040.0160 0.0160 0.0150 0.0150 0.0000 60.2808 60.2808 0.0143 0.0000 60.6371 Total 0.0383 0.3495 0.4203 7.0000e0040.0160 0.0160 0.0150 0.0150 0.0000 60.2808 60.2808 0.0143 0.0000 60.6371 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3094

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.3000e0040.0317 0.0107 1.6000e0046.0500e0032.5000e0046.3000e0031.7500e0032.4000e0041.9800e0030.0000 15.9876 15.9876 4.1000e0042.3600e00316.7000 Worker 0.0112 8.2400e0030.1093 3.3000e0040.0409 1.9000e0040.0411 0.0109 1.8000e0040.0110 0.0000 31.1319 31.1319 6.7000e0047.6000e00431.3758 Total 0.0120 0.0400 0.1200 4.9000e0040.0469 4.4000e0040.0474 0.0126 4.2000e0040.0130 0.0000 47.1194 47.1194 1.0800e0033.1200e00348.0757 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0281 0.6124 0.4647 7.0000e0040.0235 0.0235 0.0235 0.0235 0.0000 60.2807 60.2807 0.0143 0.0000 60.6371 Total 0.0281 0.6124 0.4647 7.0000e0040.0235 0.0235 0.0235 0.0235 0.0000 60.2807 60.2807 0.0143 0.0000 60.6371 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3095

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.4200e0030.0619 0.0951 1.5000e0043.0500e0033.0500e0032.8000e0032.8000e0030.0000 13.0173 13.0173 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1225 Paving 6.8300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0133 0.0619 0.0951 1.5000e0043.0500e0033.0500e0032.8000e0032.8000e0030.0000 13.0173 13.0173 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1225 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3096

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e0042.7000e0043.5900e0031.0000e0051.3500e0031.0000e0051.3500e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.6000e0040.0000 1.0241 1.0241 2.0000e0053.0000e0051.0321 Total 3.7000e0042.7000e0043.5900e0031.0000e0051.3500e0031.0000e0051.3500e0033.6000e0041.0000e0053.6000e0040.0000 1.0241 1.0241 2.0000e0053.0000e0051.0321 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.0500e0030.1307 0.1124 1.5000e0044.3400e0034.3400e0034.3400e0034.3400e0030.0000 13.0172 13.0172 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1225 Paving 6.8300e0030.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0129 0.1307 0.1124 1.5000e0044.3400e0034.3400e0034.3400e0034.3400e0030.0000 13.0172 13.0172 4.2100e0030.0000 13.1225 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3097

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.6000e0044.2000e0045.5100e0032.0000e0052.0600e0031.0000e0052.0700e0035.5000e0041.0000e0055.6000e0040.0000 1.5703 1.5703 3.0000e0054.0000e0051.5826 Total 5.6000e0044.2000e0045.5100e0032.0000e0052.0600e0031.0000e0052.0700e0035.5000e0041.0000e0055.6000e0040.0000 1.5703 1.5703 3.0000e0054.0000e0051.5826 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 1.2919 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.4000e0040.0153 0.0119 2.0000e0056.2000e0046.2000e0046.2000e0046.2000e0040.0000 1.6596 1.6596 9.0000e0050.0000 1.6620 Total 1.2926 0.0153 0.0119 2.0000e0056.2000e0046.2000e0046.2000e0046.2000e0040.0000 1.6596 1.6596 9.0000e0050.0000 1.6620 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3099

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3100
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 0.2689 0.4550 3.0211 7.1300e0030.7757 5.6400e0030.7814 0.2072 5.2800e0030.2125 0.0000 675.3712 675.3712 0.0350 0.0320 685.7892 Unmitigated 0.2689 0.4550 3.0211 7.1300e0030.7757 5.6400e0030.7814 0.2072 5.2800e0030.2125 0.0000 675.3712 675.3712 0.0350 0.0320 685.7892

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 57.24 57.24 57.24 245,314 245,314 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 422.82 422.82 422.82 1,812,087 1,812,087 Total 480.06 480.06 480.06 2,057,401 2,057,401
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
Refrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3101
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.543085 0.056300 0.173085 0.134258 0.025645 0.007009 0.011926 0.017481 0.000552 0.000248 0.024848 0.000956 0.004606 Parking Lot 0.543085 0.056300 0.173085 0.134258 0.025645 0.007009 0.011926 0.017481 0.000552 0.000248 0.024848 0.000956 0.004606 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.543085 0.056300 0.173085 0.134258 0.025645 0.007009 0.011926 0.017481 0.000552 0.000248 0.024848 0.000956 0.004606 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

0.543085 0.056300 0.173085 0.134258 0.025645 0.007009 0.011926 0.017481 0.000552 0.000248 0.024848 0.000956 0.004606

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 298.2957 298.2957 0.0252 3.0500e003299.8346 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 298.2957 298.2957 0.0252 3.0500e003299.8346 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0102 0.0924 0.0777 5.5000e0047.0300e0037.0300e0037.0300e0037.0300e0030.0000 100.6308 100.6308 1.9300e0031.8400e003101.2288 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0102 0.0924 0.0777 5.5000e0047.0300e0037.0300e0037.0300e0037.0300e0030.0000 100.6308 100.6308 1.9300e0031.8400e003101.2288

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3102

1.39671e
+006

7.5300e0030.0685 0.0575 4.1000e0045.2000e0035.2000e0035.2000e0035.2000e0030.0000 74.5338 74.5338 1.4300e0031.3700e00374.9767 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
489039 2.6400e0030.0240 0.0201 1.4000e0041.8200e0031.8200e0031.8200e0031.8200e0030.0000 26.0970 26.0970 5.0000e0044.8000e00426.2521 Total 0.0102 0.0924 0.0777 5.5000e0047.0200e0037.0200e0037.0200e0037.0200e0030.0000 100.6308 100.6308 1.9300e0031.8500e003101.2288 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3103

1.39671e
+006

7.5300e0030.0685 0.0575 4.1000e0045.2000e0035.2000e0035.2000e0035.2000e0030.0000 74.5338 74.5338 1.4300e0031.3700e00374.9767 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
489039 2.6400e0030.0240 0.0201 1.4000e0041.8200e0031.8200e0031.8200e0031.8200e0030.0000 26.0970 26.0970 5.0000e0044.8000e00426.2521 Total 0.0102 0.0924 0.0777 5.5000e0047.0200e0037.0200e0037.0200e0037.0200e0030.0000 100.6308 100.6308 1.9300e0031.8500e003101.2288 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3104

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 41860 7.4237 6.3000e0048.0000e0057.4620
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

1.07568e
+006
190.7671 0.0161 1.9500e003191.7512
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
564463 100.1050 8.4500e0031.0200e003100.6214
Total 298.2957 0.0252 3.0500e003299.8346
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3106
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.1249 8.0000e0059.2900e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 0.0181 0.0181 5.0000e0050.0000 0.0193 Unmitigated 1.1249 8.0000e0059.2900e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 0.0181 0.0181 5.0000e0050.0000 0.0193

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.1292 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.9949 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 8.6000e0048.0000e0059.2900e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 0.0181 0.0181 5.0000e0050.0000 0.0193 Total 1.1249 8.0000e0059.2900e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 0.0181 0.0181 5.0000e0050.0000 0.0193 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3107

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.1292 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

0.9949 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 8.6000e0048.0000e0059.2900e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 0.0181 0.0181 5.0000e0050.0000 0.0193 Total 1.1249 8.0000e0059.2900e0030.0000 3.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0050.0000 0.0181 0.0181 5.0000e0050.0000 0.0193 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3108
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 163.9902 2.0467 0.0495 229.9130
Unmitigated 163.9902 2.0467 0.0495 229.9130

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

6.24375 /
0 16.3990 0.2047 4.9500e00322.9913
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

56.1938 /
0 147.5912 1.8420 0.0446 206.9217
Total 163.9902 2.0467 0.0495 229.9130
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3109

6.24375 /
0 16.3990 0.2047 4.9500e00322.9913
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

56.1938 /
0 147.5912 1.8420 0.0446 206.9217
Total 163.9902 2.0467 0.0495 229.9130
Mitigated

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3110
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 51.5191 3.0447 0.0000 127.6364
Unmitigated 51.5191 3.0447 0.0000 127.6364
Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

25.38 5.1519 0.3045 0.0000 12.7636
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
228.42 46.3672 2.7402 0.0000 114.8728
Total 51.5191 3.0447 0.0000 127.6364
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3111

25.38 5.1519 0.3045 0.0000 12.7636
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
228.42 46.3672 2.7402 0.0000 114.8728
Total 51.5191 3.0447 0.0000 127.6364
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 36 of 36 Date: 9/27/2023 4:08 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3113
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction)
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer
Project Characteristics - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Land Use - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths" Grading - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Trips and VMT - Consistent with DEIR's model.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3114
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3115
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 188.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 19.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 6.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/11/2024 4/17/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/16/2024 3/12/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/29/2023 5/18/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/24/2023 6/22/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/14/2024 3/29/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/12/2023 5/26/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/15/2024 3/30/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/25/2023 6/23/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/13/2023 5/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/17/2024 3/13/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/30/2023 5/19/2023 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 243,000.00 243,303.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.58 7.08
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.62 0.79
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.69 1.53
tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.70 3.68
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 38.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3116

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 90.00 25.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 18.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 231.00 114.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 46.00 23.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3117

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.4230 35.0214 29.1274 0.0670 19.9575 1.4301 21.2266 10.1832 1.3159 11.3509 0.0000 6,527.392 5 6,527.392
5 1.9586 0.1339 6,589.880
3 2024 199.0264 14.8878 21.4861 0.0471 1.8398 0.6303 2.4701 0.4932 0.5929 1.0861 0.0000 4,661.668 4 4,661.668
4 0.7177 0.1301 4,716.680
3 Maximum 199.0264 35.0214 29.1274 0.0670 19.9575 1.4301 21.2266 10.1832 1.3159 11.3509 0.0000 6,527.392 5 6,527.392
5 1.9586 0.1339 6,589.880
3 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 1.9118 51.7444 37.7988 0.0670 19.9575 1.3389 20.9068 10.1832 1.3386 11.1323 0.0000 6,527.392 5 6,527.392
5 1.9586 0.1339 6,589.880
3 2024 198.9596 24.9984 23.1930 0.0471 1.8398 0.9205 2.7604 0.4932 0.9195 1.4128 0.0000 4,661.668 4 4,661.668
4 0.7177 0.1301 4,716.680
3 Maximum 198.9596 51.7444 37.7988 0.0670 19.9575 1.3389 20.9068 10.1832 1.3386 11.1323 0.0000 6,527.392 5 6,527.392
5 1.9586 0.1339 6,589.880
3 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3118
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.78 -53.77 -20.51 0.00 0.00 -9.66 0.12 0.00 -18.31 -0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3119

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Energy 0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 Mobile 1.6822 2.3048 17.9617 0.0417 4.3441 0.0310 4.3751 1.1586 0.0290 1.1876 4,350.249 4 4,350.249
4 0.2065 0.1869 4,411.099
8 Total 7.9041 2.8120 18.4615 0.0447 4.3441 0.0698 4.4138 1.1586 0.0678 1.2263 4,958.225 1 4,958.225
1 0.2186 0.1980 5,022.697
8 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Energy 0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 Mobile 1.6822 2.3048 17.9617 0.0417 4.3441 0.0310 4.3751 1.1586 0.0290 1.1876 4,350.249 4 4,350.249
4 0.2065 0.1869 4,411.099
8 Total 7.9041 2.8120 18.4615 0.0447 4.3441 0.0698 4.4138 1.1586 0.0678 1.2263 4,958.225 1 4,958.225
1 0.2186 0.1980 5,022.697
8 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3120

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 5/2/2023 5/18/2023 5 13
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/19/2023 5/26/2023 5 6 3 Grading Grading 5/27/2023 6/22/2023 5 19
4 Building Construction Building Construction 6/23/2023 3/12/2024 5 188 5 Paving Paving 3/13/2024 3/29/2024 5 13
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/30/2024 4/17/2024 5 13 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 405,455; Non-Residential Outdoor: 135,152; Striped Parking Area:
16,836 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 9
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 57
Acres of Paving: 5.21
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3121

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 18.00 0.00 3.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 5.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 5.00 38.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 114.00 25.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 23.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3122

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.6000e0040.0254 7.7300e0031.3000e0044.0400e0032.7000e0044.3100e0031.1100e0032.6000e0041.3600e00314.1270 14.1270 6.0000e0042.2400e00314.8094 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0807 0.0512 0.8336 2.2500e0030.2532 1.2300e0030.2544 0.0671 1.1300e0030.0683 230.5180 230.5180 5.0000e0035.1700e003232.1822 Total 0.0812 0.0766 0.8413 2.3800e0030.2572 1.5000e0030.2587 0.0682 1.3900e0030.0696 244.6450 244.6450 5.6000e0037.4100e003246.9916 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3123

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.2617 32.6638 24.6739 0.0388 0.9135 0.9135 0.9135 0.9135 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 1.2617 32.6638 24.6739 0.0388 0.9135 0.9135 0.9135 0.9135 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.6000e0040.0254 7.7300e0031.3000e0044.0400e0032.7000e0044.3100e0031.1100e0032.6000e0041.3600e00314.1270 14.1270 6.0000e0042.2400e00314.8094 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0807 0.0512 0.8336 2.2500e0030.2532 1.2300e0030.2544 0.0671 1.1300e0030.0683 230.5180 230.5180 5.0000e0035.1700e003232.1822 Total 0.0812 0.0766 0.8413 2.3800e0030.2572 1.5000e0030.2587 0.0682 1.3900e0030.0696 244.6450 244.6450 5.6000e0037.4100e003246.9916 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3124

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.7900e0030.2289 0.0830 1.2800e0030.0473 1.9300e0030.0492 0.0136 1.8500e0030.0155 137.3494 137.3494 3.5800e0030.0202 143.4684 Worker 0.0807 0.0512 0.8336 2.2500e0030.2532 1.2300e0030.2544 0.0671 1.1300e0030.0683 230.5180 230.5180 5.0000e0035.1700e003232.1822 Total 0.0875 0.2801 0.9166 3.5300e0030.3005 3.1600e0030.3036 0.0807 2.9800e0030.0837 367.8673 367.8673 8.5800e0030.0254 375.6506 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3125

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2097 33.7214 22.9600 0.0381 0.9462 0.9462 0.9462 0.9462 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 1.2097 33.7214 22.9600 0.0381 19.6570 0.9462 20.6032 10.1025 0.9462 11.0486 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.7900e0030.2289 0.0830 1.2800e0030.0473 1.9300e0030.0492 0.0136 1.8500e0030.0155 137.3494 137.3494 3.5800e0030.0202 143.4684 Worker 0.0807 0.0512 0.8336 2.2500e0030.2532 1.2300e0030.2544 0.0671 1.1300e0030.0683 230.5180 230.5180 5.0000e0035.1700e003232.1822 Total 0.0875 0.2801 0.9166 3.5300e0030.3005 3.1600e0030.3036 0.0807 2.9800e0030.0837 367.8673 367.8673 8.5800e0030.0254 375.6506 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3126

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 4.8200e0030.2200 0.0670 1.1200e0030.0350 2.3100e0030.0373 9.6000e0032.2100e0030.0118 122.4344 122.4344 5.2200e0030.0194 128.3481 Vendor 6.7900e0030.2289 0.0830 1.2800e0030.0473 1.9300e0030.0492 0.0136 1.8500e0030.0155 137.3494 137.3494 3.5800e0030.0202 143.4684 Worker 0.0896 0.0569 0.9262 2.5000e0030.2813 1.3700e0030.2827 0.0746 1.2600e0030.0759 256.1311 256.1311 5.5600e0035.7400e003257.9802 Total 0.1012 0.5058 1.0762 4.9000e0030.3636 5.6100e0030.3692 0.0978 5.3200e0030.1031 515.9148 515.9148 0.0144 0.0454 529.7967 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3127

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.8106 51.2386 36.7226 0.0621 1.3333 1.3333 1.3333 1.3333 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 1.8106 51.2386 36.7226 0.0621 9.2036 1.3333 10.5369 3.6538 1.3333 4.9871 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 4.8200e0030.2200 0.0670 1.1200e0030.0350 2.3100e0030.0373 9.6000e0032.2100e0030.0118 122.4344 122.4344 5.2200e0030.0194 128.3481 Vendor 6.7900e0030.2289 0.0830 1.2800e0030.0473 1.9300e0030.0492 0.0136 1.8500e0030.0155 137.3494 137.3494 3.5800e0030.0202 143.4684 Worker 0.0896 0.0569 0.9262 2.5000e0030.2813 1.3700e0030.2827 0.0746 1.2600e0030.0759 256.1311 256.1311 5.5600e0035.7400e003257.9802 Total 0.1012 0.5058 1.0762 4.9000e0030.3636 5.6100e0030.3692 0.0978 5.3200e0030.1031 515.9148 515.9148 0.0144 0.0454 529.7967 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3128

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0340 1.1446 0.4151 6.4000e0030.2365 9.6600e0030.2461 0.0681 9.2400e0030.0773 686.7469 686.7469 0.0179 0.1012 717.3418 Worker 0.5109 0.3244 5.2794 0.0143 1.6034 7.7800e0031.6111 0.4252 7.1600e0030.4323 1,459.947 0 1,459.947
0 0.0317 0.0327 1,470.487
3 Total 0.5449 1.4690 5.6945 0.0207 1.8398 0.0174 1.8573 0.4932 0.0164 0.5096 2,146.693 9 2,146.693
9 0.0496 0.1339 2,187.829
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3129

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0809 23.5544 17.8738 0.0269 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.0809 23.5544 17.8738 0.0269 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0340 1.1446 0.4151 6.4000e0030.2365 9.6600e0030.2461 0.0681 9.2400e0030.0773 686.7469 686.7469 0.0179 0.1012 717.3418 Worker 0.5109 0.3244 5.2794 0.0143 1.6034 7.7800e0031.6111 0.4252 7.1600e0030.4323 1,459.947 0 1,459.947
0 0.0317 0.0327 1,470.487
3 Total 0.5449 1.4690 5.6945 0.0207 1.8398 0.0174 1.8573 0.4932 0.0164 0.5096 2,146.693 9 2,146.693
9 0.0496 0.1339 2,187.829
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3130

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0331 1.1565 0.4072 6.3200e0030.2365 9.5100e0030.2460 0.0681 9.1000e0030.0772 677.3311 677.3311 0.0173 0.0998 707.4951 Worker 0.4749 0.2875 4.9121 0.0139 1.6034 7.4800e0031.6108 0.4252 6.8800e0030.4321 1,428.638 4 1,428.638
4 0.0286 0.0303 1,438.377
5 Total 0.5080 1.4440 5.3193 0.0202 1.8398 0.0170 1.8568 0.4932 0.0160 0.5092 2,105.969 5 2,105.969
5 0.0459 0.1301 2,145.872
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3131

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0809 23.5544 17.8738 0.0270 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.0809 23.5544 17.8738 0.0270 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0331 1.1565 0.4072 6.3200e0030.2365 9.5100e0030.2460 0.0681 9.1000e0030.0772 677.3311 677.3311 0.0173 0.0998 707.4951 Worker 0.4749 0.2875 4.9121 0.0139 1.6034 7.4800e0031.6108 0.4252 6.8800e0030.4321 1,428.638 4 1,428.638
4 0.0286 0.0303 1,438.377
5 Total 0.5080 1.4440 5.3193 0.0202 1.8398 0.0170 1.8568 0.4932 0.0160 0.5092 2,105.969 5 2,105.969
5 0.0459 0.1301 2,145.872
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3132

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 1.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.0382 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0625 0.0378 0.6463 1.8200e0030.2110 9.8000e0040.2120 0.0559 9.1000e0040.0569 187.9787 187.9787 3.7600e0033.9800e003189.2602 Total 0.0625 0.0378 0.6463 1.8200e0030.2110 9.8000e0040.2120 0.0559 9.1000e0040.0569 187.9787 187.9787 3.7600e0033.9800e003189.2602 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3133

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9311 20.1146 17.2957 0.0228 0.6670 0.6670 0.6670 0.6670 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 1.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.9811 20.1146 17.2957 0.0228 0.6670 0.6670 0.6670 0.6670 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0625 0.0378 0.6463 1.8200e0030.2110 9.8000e0040.2120 0.0559 9.1000e0040.0569 187.9787 187.9787 3.7600e0033.9800e003189.2602 Total 0.0625 0.0378 0.6463 1.8200e0030.2110 9.8000e0040.2120 0.0559 9.1000e0040.0569 187.9787 187.9787 3.7600e0033.9800e003189.2602 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3134

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 198.7499 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 198.9306 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0958 0.0580 0.9910 2.7900e0030.3235 1.5100e0030.3250 0.0858 1.3900e0030.0872 288.2341 288.2341 5.7700e0036.1100e003290.1990 Total 0.0958 0.0580 0.9910 2.7900e0030.3235 1.5100e0030.3250 0.0858 1.3900e0030.0872 288.2341 288.2341 5.7700e0036.1100e003290.1990 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3135

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 198.7499 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1139 2.3524 1.8324 2.9700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 198.8638 2.3524 1.8324 2.9700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0958 0.0580 0.9910 2.7900e0030.3235 1.5100e0030.3250 0.0858 1.3900e0030.0872 288.2341 288.2341 5.7700e0036.1100e003290.1990 Total 0.0958 0.0580 0.9910 2.7900e0030.3235 1.5100e0030.3250 0.0858 1.3900e0030.0872 288.2341 288.2341 5.7700e0036.1100e003290.1990 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3136

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.6822 2.3048 17.9617 0.0417 4.3441 0.0310 4.3751 1.1586 0.0290 1.1876 4,350.249 4 4,350.249
4 0.2065 0.1869 4,411.099
8 Unmitigated 1.6822 2.3048 17.9617 0.0417 4.3441 0.0310 4.3751 1.1586 0.0290 1.1876 4,350.249 4 4,350.249
4 0.2065 0.1869 4,411.099
8 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3137
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.543085 0.056300 0.173085 0.134258 0.025645 0.007009 0.011926 0.017481 0.000552 0.000248 0.024848 0.000956 0.004606 Parking Lot 0.543085 0.056300 0.173085 0.134258 0.025645 0.007009 0.011926 0.017481 0.000552 0.000248 0.024848 0.000956 0.004606 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.543085 0.056300 0.173085 0.134258 0.025645 0.007009 0.011926 0.017481 0.000552 0.000248 0.024848 0.000956 0.004606 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

0.543085 0.056300 0.173085 0.134258 0.025645 0.007009 0.011926 0.017481 0.000552 0.000248 0.024848 0.000956 0.004606

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3138

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
3826.6 0.0413 0.3752 0.3151 2.2500e0030.0285 0.0285 0.0285 0.0285 450.1886 450.1886 8.6300e0038.2500e003452.8638 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1339.83 0.0145 0.1314 0.1103 7.9000e0049.9800e0039.9800e0039.9800e0039.9800e003157.6274 157.6274 3.0200e0032.8900e003158.5641 Total 0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3139

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

3.8266 0.0413 0.3752 0.3151 2.2500e0030.0285 0.0285 0.0285 0.0285 450.1886 450.1886 8.6300e0038.2500e003452.8638 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

1.33983 0.0145 0.1314 0.1103 7.9000e0049.9800e0039.9800e0039.9800e0039.9800e003157.6274 157.6274 3.0200e0032.8900e003158.5641 Total 0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3140
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Unmitigated 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

0.7079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

5.4514 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.8400e0036.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Total 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3141

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.7079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

5.4514 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.8400e0036.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Total 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3142

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:04 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3143
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction)
San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter
Project Characteristics - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Land Use - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment on "Unsubstantiated Changes to Individual Construction Phase Lengths" Grading - Consistent with DEIR's model.

Trips and VMT - Consistent with DEIR's model.

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
10 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 32

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
Operational Year 2025
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3144
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 2
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3145
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 188.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 19.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 13.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 6.00
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 11/11/2024 4/17/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/16/2024 3/12/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/29/2023 5/18/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/24/2023 6/22/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/14/2024 3/29/2024
tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 6/12/2023 5/26/2023
tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 10/15/2024 3/30/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 7/25/2023 6/23/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 6/13/2023 5/27/2023 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/17/2024 3/13/2024 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/30/2023 5/19/2023 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 243,000.00 243,303.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.58 7.08
tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.62 0.79
tblLandUse LotAcreage 2.69 1.53
tblLandUse LotAcreage 3.70 3.68
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 3.00
tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 0.00 38.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3146

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 6.90 10.20
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 5.00
tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 90.00 25.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 18.50
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 18.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 231.00 114.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 46.00 23.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3147

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 3.4204 35.0486 28.9591 0.0668 19.9575 1.4301 21.2267 10.1832 1.3159 11.3509 0.0000 6,503.656 3 6,503.656
3 1.9585 0.1352 6,566.217
5 2024 199.0247 14.9646 20.5895 0.0458 1.8398 0.6303 2.4701 0.4932 0.5929 1.0861 0.0000 4,528.386 6 4,528.386
6 0.7177 0.1312 4,583.735
0 Maximum 199.0247 35.0486 28.9591 0.0668 19.9575 1.4301 21.2267 10.1832 1.3159 11.3509 0.0000 6,503.656 3 6,503.656
3 1.9585 0.1352 6,566.217
5 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2023 1.9093 51.7716 37.6305 0.0668 19.9575 1.3389 20.9068 10.1832 1.3386 11.1323 0.0000 6,503.656 3 6,503.656
3 1.9585 0.1352 6,566.217
5 2024 198.9579 25.0753 22.2964 0.0458 1.8398 0.9206 2.7604 0.4932 0.9196 1.4128 0.0000 4,528.386 6 4,528.386
6 0.7177 0.1312 4,583.735
0 Maximum 198.9579 51.7716 37.6305 0.0668 19.9575 1.3389 20.9068 10.1832 1.3386 11.1323 0.0000 6,503.656 3 6,503.656
3 1.9585 0.1352 6,566.217
5 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3148
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.78 -53.65 -20.95 0.00 0.00 -9.66 0.12 0.00 -18.31 -0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3149

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Energy 0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 Mobile 1.4842 2.4487 15.9232 0.0386 4.3441 0.0310 4.3751 1.1586 0.0290 1.1876 4,035.017 0 4,035.017
0 0.2097 0.1913 4,097.274
5 Total 7.7060 2.9559 16.4230 0.0417 4.3441 0.0698 4.4138 1.1586 0.0678 1.2264 4,642.992 7 4,642.992
7 0.2217 0.2025 4,708.872
6 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Energy 0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 Mobile 1.4842 2.4487 15.9232 0.0386 4.3441 0.0310 4.3751 1.1586 0.0290 1.1876 4,035.017 0 4,035.017
0 0.2097 0.1913 4,097.274
5 Total 7.7060 2.9559 16.4230 0.0417 4.3441 0.0698 4.4138 1.1586 0.0678 1.2264 4,642.992 7 4,642.992
7 0.2217 0.2025 4,708.872
6 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3150

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 405,455; Non-Residential Outdoor: 135,152; Striped Parking Area:
16,836 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 9
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 57
Acres of Paving: 5.21
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3151

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 18.00 0.00 3.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 5.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 5.00 38.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 114.00 25.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 23.00 0.00 0.00 18.50 10.20 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3152

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 2.2691 21.4844 19.6434 0.0388 0.9975 0.9975 0.9280 0.9280 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.1000e0040.0268 7.8700e0031.3000e0044.0400e0032.7000e0044.3100e0031.1100e0032.6000e0041.3600e00314.1484 14.1484 6.0000e0042.2400e00314.8317 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0790 0.0538 0.6790 2.0400e0030.2532 1.2300e0030.2544 0.0671 1.1300e0030.0683 208.7797 208.7797 4.9200e0035.3300e003210.4905 Total 0.0795 0.0806 0.6869 2.1700e0030.2572 1.5000e0030.2587 0.0682 1.3900e0030.0696 222.9281 222.9281 5.5200e0037.5700e003225.3221 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3153

3.2 Demolition - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.2617 32.6638 24.6739 0.0388 0.9135 0.9135 0.9135 0.9135 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Total 1.2617 32.6638 24.6739 0.0388 0.9135 0.9135 0.9135 0.9135 0.0000 3,746.984 0 3,746.984
0 1.0494 3,773.218
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 5.1000e0040.0268 7.8700e0031.3000e0044.0400e0032.7000e0044.3100e0031.1100e0032.6000e0041.3600e00314.1484 14.1484 6.0000e0042.2400e00314.8317 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0790 0.0538 0.6790 2.0400e0030.2532 1.2300e0030.2544 0.0671 1.1300e0030.0683 208.7797 208.7797 4.9200e0035.3300e003210.4905 Total 0.0795 0.0806 0.6869 2.1700e0030.2572 1.5000e0030.2587 0.0682 1.3900e0030.0696 222.9281 222.9281 5.5200e0037.5700e003225.3221 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3154

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 1.2660 1.2660 1.1647 1.1647 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 2.6595 27.5242 18.2443 0.0381 19.6570 1.2660 20.9230 10.1025 1.1647 11.2672 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.4100e0030.2413 0.0852 1.2800e0030.0473 1.9400e0030.0492 0.0136 1.8500e0030.0155 137.5820 137.5820 3.5600e0030.0203 143.7145 Worker 0.0790 0.0538 0.6790 2.0400e0030.2532 1.2300e0030.2544 0.0671 1.1300e0030.0683 208.7797 208.7797 4.9200e0035.3300e003210.4905 Total 0.0854 0.2951 0.7643 3.3200e0030.3005 3.1700e0030.3036 0.0807 2.9800e0030.0837 346.3617 346.3617 8.4800e0030.0256 354.2050 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3155

3.3 Site Preparation - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.2097 33.7214 22.9600 0.0381 0.9462 0.9462 0.9462 0.9462 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Total 1.2097 33.7214 22.9600 0.0381 19.6570 0.9462 20.6032 10.1025 0.9462 11.0486 0.0000 3,687.308 1 3,687.308
1 1.1926 3,717.121
9 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 6.4100e0030.2413 0.0852 1.2800e0030.0473 1.9400e0030.0492 0.0136 1.8500e0030.0155 137.5820 137.5820 3.5600e0030.0203 143.7145 Worker 0.0790 0.0538 0.6790 2.0400e0030.2532 1.2300e0030.2544 0.0671 1.1300e0030.0683 208.7797 208.7797 4.9200e0035.3300e003210.4905 Total 0.0854 0.2951 0.7643 3.3200e0030.3005 3.1700e0030.3036 0.0807 2.9800e0030.0837 346.3617 346.3617 8.4800e0030.0256 354.2050 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3156

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 4.4600e0030.2319 0.0682 1.1300e0030.0350 2.3200e0030.0373 9.6000e0032.2200e0030.0118 122.6191 122.6191 5.2100e0030.0194 128.5411 Vendor 6.4100e0030.2413 0.0852 1.2800e0030.0473 1.9400e0030.0492 0.0136 1.8500e0030.0155 137.5820 137.5820 3.5600e0030.0203 143.7145 Worker 0.0878 0.0598 0.7545 2.2700e0030.2813 1.3700e0030.2827 0.0746 1.2600e0030.0759 231.9775 231.9775 5.4700e0035.9200e003233.8783 Total 0.0987 0.5330 0.9079 4.6800e0030.3636 5.6300e0030.3692 0.0978 5.3300e0030.1031 492.1786 492.1786 0.0142 0.0456 506.1339 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3157

3.4 Grading - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.8106 51.2386 36.7226 0.0621 1.3333 1.3333 1.3333 1.3333 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Total 1.8106 51.2386 36.7226 0.0621 9.2036 1.3333 10.5369 3.6538 1.3333 4.9871 0.0000 6,011.477 7 6,011.477
7 1.9442 6,060.083
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 4.4600e0030.2319 0.0682 1.1300e0030.0350 2.3200e0030.0373 9.6000e0032.2200e0030.0118 122.6191 122.6191 5.2100e0030.0194 128.5411 Vendor 6.4100e0030.2413 0.0852 1.2800e0030.0473 1.9400e0030.0492 0.0136 1.8500e0030.0155 137.5820 137.5820 3.5600e0030.0203 143.7145 Worker 0.0878 0.0598 0.7545 2.2700e0030.2813 1.3700e0030.2827 0.0746 1.2600e0030.0759 231.9775 231.9775 5.4700e0035.9200e003233.8783 Total 0.0987 0.5330 0.9079 4.6800e0030.3636 5.6300e0030.3692 0.0978 5.3300e0030.1031 492.1786 492.1786 0.0142 0.0456 506.1339 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3158

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0320 1.2065 0.4261 6.4100e0030.2365 9.6800e0030.2461 0.0681 9.2600e0030.0773 687.9099 687.9099 0.0178 0.1014 718.5725 Worker 0.5004 0.3410 4.3005 0.0129 1.6034 7.7800e0031.6111 0.4252 7.1600e0030.4323 1,322.271 5 1,322.271
5 0.0312 0.0338 1,333.106
3 Total 0.5325 1.5475 4.7266 0.0193 1.8398 0.0175 1.8573 0.4932 0.0164 0.5097 2,010.181 4 2,010.181
4 0.0489 0.1352 2,051.678
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3159

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0809 23.5544 17.8738 0.0269 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.0809 23.5544 17.8738 0.0269 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0320 1.2065 0.4261 6.4100e0030.2365 9.6800e0030.2461 0.0681 9.2600e0030.0773 687.9099 687.9099 0.0178 0.1014 718.5725 Worker 0.5004 0.3410 4.3005 0.0129 1.6034 7.7800e0031.6111 0.4252 7.1600e0030.4323 1,322.271 5 1,322.271
5 0.0312 0.0338 1,333.106
3 Total 0.5325 1.5475 4.7266 0.0193 1.8398 0.0175 1.8573 0.4932 0.0164 0.5097 2,010.181 4 2,010.181
4 0.0489 0.1352 2,051.678
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3160

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0311 1.2188 0.4182 6.3300e0030.2365 9.5300e0030.2460 0.0681 9.1200e0030.0772 678.4871 678.4871 0.0172 0.1000 708.7168 Worker 0.4665 0.3021 4.0044 0.0126 1.6034 7.4800e0031.6108 0.4252 6.8800e0030.4321 1,294.200 5 1,294.200
5 0.0282 0.0312 1,304.210
5 Total 0.4976 1.5209 4.4226 0.0189 1.8398 0.0170 1.8568 0.4932 0.0160 0.5092 1,972.687 7 1,972.687
7 0.0454 0.1312 2,012.927
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3161

3.5 Building Construction - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0809 23.5544 17.8738 0.0270 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Total 1.0809 23.5544 17.8738 0.0270 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.9036 0.0000 2,555.698 9 2,555.698
9 0.6044 2,570.807
7 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0311 1.2188 0.4182 6.3300e0030.2365 9.5300e0030.2460 0.0681 9.1200e0030.0772 678.4871 678.4871 0.0172 0.1000 708.7168 Worker 0.4665 0.3021 4.0044 0.0126 1.6034 7.4800e0031.6108 0.4252 6.8800e0030.4321 1,294.200 5 1,294.200
5 0.0282 0.0312 1,304.210
5 Total 0.4976 1.5209 4.4226 0.0189 1.8398 0.0170 1.8568 0.4932 0.0160 0.5092 1,972.687 7 1,972.687
7 0.0454 0.1312 2,012.927
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3162

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 1.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.0382 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0614 0.0397 0.5269 1.6500e0030.2110 9.8000e0040.2120 0.0559 9.1000e0040.0569 170.2895 170.2895 3.7100e0034.1100e003171.6067 Total 0.0614 0.0397 0.5269 1.6500e0030.2110 9.8000e0040.2120 0.0559 9.1000e0040.0569 170.2895 170.2895 3.7100e0034.1100e003171.6067 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3163

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9311 20.1146 17.2957 0.0228 0.6670 0.6670 0.6670 0.6670 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 1.0500 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.9811 20.1146 17.2957 0.0228 0.6670 0.6670 0.6670 0.6670 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0614 0.0397 0.5269 1.6500e0030.2110 9.8000e0040.2120 0.0559 9.1000e0040.0569 170.2895 170.2895 3.7100e0034.1100e003171.6067 Total 0.0614 0.0397 0.5269 1.6500e0030.2110 9.8000e0040.2120 0.0559 9.1000e0040.0569 170.2895 170.2895 3.7100e0034.1100e003171.6067 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3164

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 198.7499 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 198.9306 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e0030.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0941 0.0609 0.8079 2.5300e0030.3235 1.5100e0030.3250 0.0858 1.3900e0030.0872 261.1106 261.1106 5.6900e0036.3000e003263.1302 Total 0.0941 0.0609 0.8079 2.5300e0030.3235 1.5100e0030.3250 0.0858 1.3900e0030.0872 261.1106 261.1106 5.6900e0036.3000e003263.1302 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3165

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 198.7499 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1139 2.3524 1.8324 2.9700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 198.8638 2.3524 1.8324 2.9700e0030.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0941 0.0609 0.8079 2.5300e0030.3235 1.5100e0030.3250 0.0858 1.3900e0030.0872 261.1106 261.1106 5.6900e0036.3000e003263.1302 Total 0.0941 0.0609 0.8079 2.5300e0030.3235 1.5100e0030.3250 0.0858 1.3900e0030.0872 261.1106 261.1106 5.6900e0036.3000e003263.1302 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3166

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 1.4842 2.4487 15.9232 0.0386 4.3441 0.0310 4.3751 1.1586 0.0290 1.1876 4,035.017 0 4,035.017
0 0.2097 0.1913 4,097.274
5 Unmitigated 1.4842 2.4487 15.9232 0.0386 4.3441 0.0310 4.3751 1.1586 0.0290 1.1876 4,035.017 0 4,035.017
0 0.2097 0.1913 4,097.274
5 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

4.2 Trip Summary Information

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3167
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail

16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3

0.543085 0.056300 0.173085 0.134258 0.025645 0.007009 0.011926 0.017481 0.000552 0.000248 0.024848 0.000956 0.004606

5.0 Energy Detail
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3168

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Refrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
3826.6 0.0413 0.3752 0.3151 2.2500e0030.0285 0.0285 0.0285 0.0285 450.1886 450.1886 8.6300e0038.2500e003452.8638 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail
1339.83 0.0145 0.1314 0.1103 7.9000e0049.9800e0039.9800e0039.9800e0039.9800e003157.6274 157.6274 3.0200e0032.8900e003158.5641 Total 0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3169

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

3.8266 0.0413 0.3752 0.3151 2.2500e0030.0285 0.0285 0.0285 0.0285 450.1886 450.1886 8.6300e0038.2500e003452.8638 Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No
Rail

1.33983 0.0145 0.1314 0.1103 7.9000e0049.9800e0039.9800e0039.9800e0039.9800e003157.6274 157.6274 3.0200e0032.8900e003158.5641 Total 0.0557 0.5065 0.4255 3.0400e0030.0385 0.0385 0.0385 0.0385 607.8160 607.8160 0.0117 0.0111 611.4279 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3170
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Unmitigated 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702

0.7079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

5.4514 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.8400e0036.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Total 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3171

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

0.7079 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

5.4514 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.8400e0036.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Total 6.1661 6.7000e0040.0743 1.0000e0052.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0042.6000e0040.1598 0.1598 4.2000e0040.1702 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3172

11.0 Vegetation

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

8.0 Waste Detail

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 30 Date: 9/27/2023 4:09 PM IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 3173
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigationand RemediationStrategies
LitigationSupport and Testifying Expert
IndustrialStormwaterCompliance
CEQAReview
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

ProfessionalCertifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
ProfessionalExperience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment C
3174
2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vaporintrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications forlarge solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Seniorresearcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
3175
3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 3176
4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 3177
5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peerreview of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
3178
6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.
3179
7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 3180
8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.
3181

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Focus on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years of experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Attachment D
3182
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 12 October 2022
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Rosenfeld P. E., Spaeth K., Hallman R., Bressler R., Smith, G., (2022) Cancer Risk and Diesel Exhaust Exposure Among Railroad Workers. Water Air Soil Pollution. 233, 171.

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. 3183
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 12 October 2022
Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393. 3184
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.
3185
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois. 3186
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 12 October 2022
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah. 3187
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 12 October 2022
Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997. 3188
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 12 October 2022
James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Billy Wildrick, Plaintiff vs. BNSF Railway Company
Case No. CIVDS1711810
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-17-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County, State of Georgia
Richard Hutcherson, Plaintiff vs Norfolk Southern Railway Company Case No. 10-SCCV-092007
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2022
In the Civil District Court of the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana Millard Clark, Plaintiff vs. Dixie Carriers, Inc. et al.

Case No. 2020-03891
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-15-2022
In The Circuit Court of Livingston County, State of Missouri, Circuit Civil Division Shirley Ralls, Plaintiff vs. Canadian Pacific Railway and Soo Line Railroad Case No. 18-LV-CC0020
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-7-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jonny C. Daniels, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. 20-CA-5502
Rosenfeld Deposition 9-1-2022
In The Circuit Court of St. Louis County, State of Missouri Kieth Luke et. al. Plaintiff vs. Monsanto Company et. al.

Case No. 19SL-CC03191
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-25-2022
In The Circuit Court of the 13th Judicial Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida Civil Division Jeffery S. Lamotte, Plaintiff vs. CSX Transportation Inc.

Case No. NO. 20-CA-0049
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-22-2022
In State of Minnesota District Court, County of St. Louis Sixth Judicial District Greg Bean, Plaintiff vs. Soo Line Railroad Company
Case No. 69-DU-CV-21-760
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-17-2022
In United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma, Washington John D. Fitzgerald Plaintiff vs. BNSF
Case No. 3:21-cv-05288-RJB
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-11-2022
3189
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 12 October 2022
In Circuit Court of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Macon Illinois Rocky Bennyhoff Plaintiff vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-L-56
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-3-2022
In Court of Common Pleas, Hamilton County Ohio
Joe Briggins Plaintiff vs. CSX
Case No. A2004464
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-17-2022
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern George LaFazia vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. BCV-19-103087
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-17-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Bobby Earles vs. Penn Central et. al.

Case No. 2020-L-000550
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-16-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of Florida Albert Hartman Plaintiff vs. Illinois Central
Case No. 2:20-cv-1633
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-4-2022

In the Circuit Court of the 4th Judicial Circuit, in and For Duval County, Florida Barbara Steele vs. CSX Transportation
Case No.16-219-Ca-008796
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2022
In United States District Court Easter District of New York Romano et al. vs. Northrup Grumman Corporation
Case No. 16-cv-5760
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-10-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Linda Benjamin vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 007599
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Donald Smith vs. Illinois Central
Case No. No. 2019 L 003426
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-24-2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Jan Holeman vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 000675
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-18-2022
In the State Court of Bibb County State of Georgia
Dwayne B. Garrett vs. Norfolk Southern
Case No. 20-SCCV-091232
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-10-2021
3190
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 12 October 2022
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Ruepke vs. BNSF
Case No. 2019 L 007730
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-5-2021
In the United States District Court For the District of Nebraska Steven Gillett vs. BNSF
Case No. 4:20-cv-03120
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-28-2021
In the Montana Thirteenth District Court of Yellowstone County James Eadus vs. Soo Line Railroad and BNSF
Case No. DV 19-1056
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-21-2021

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al.cvs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc.

Case No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-14-2021
Trial October 8-4-2021
In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a

AMTRAK,
Case No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-28-2021
In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail Case No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al. vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case No. CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-7-2021
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case No. 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-25-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021
In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020
In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No. 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-30-2019
3191
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 11 of 12 October 2022
In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition 6-7-2019
In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No. 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237
Rosenfeld Deposition 5-9-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition 1-26-2019
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiffs vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No. 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018
In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No. 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-17-2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintifs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No. C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition 11-20-2017
In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-23-2017
In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case No. 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition 4-22-2020
In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No. LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018
In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2017
3192
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 12 of 12 October 2022
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No. RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No. LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action No. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition June 2015
In The Iowa District Court for Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No. 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case No. CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case No. cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case No. 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987)
Rosenfeld Deposition October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action No. 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition July 2009
3193
DATE: November 21, 2023
TO: Tracy Zinn, T&B Planning, Inc.

FROM: Alex So, Urban Crossroads, Inc.

JOB NO: 14539-01 VMT - Mitigation
IE DISTRIBUTION CENTER #14 VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT)

MITIGATION ASSESSMENT
Urban Crossroads, Inc. has prepared the following Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Mitigation Assessment for the IE Distribution Center #14 (Project), which is located at 5355 E. Airport Drive in the City of Ontario.

BACKGROUND
The IE Distribution Center #14 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis (Urban Crossroads, Inc. January 3, 2023) (VMT Analysis) previously evaluated a single 270,377 square foot warehouse building.

The VMT Analysis concluded that the Project would result in a potentially significant VMT impact based on project generated VMT. More specifically, the Project was found to exceed the City’s adopted impact threshold by 22.6% under baseline conditions, while the horizon year buildout condition would exceed the impact threshold by 28.5%. The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate potential trip reduction measures to reduce VMT to the extent feasible.

VMT REDUCTION MEASURES
The effectiveness of trip reduction measures that have the ability to reduce VMT has been determined based on the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity (December 2021) (Handbook) (1). The Handbook provides methods to quantify reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and for transportation related measures associated reductions in VMT. This evaluation will focus on relevant transportation measures as described by the Handbook.

SELECTING MEASURES
When considering which transportation measures are applicable from the Handbook, factors such as project type, scale and locational context are each important considerations for determining measure applicability. Users of the Handbook must review the measure factsheets to determine those measures that align and are applicable with project characteristics.
3194
Tracy Zinn, T&B Planning, Inc.

November 21, 2023

Page 2 of 4 ends

14539-01 VMT - Mitigation

PROJECT TYPE
Project type is an important consideration when determining which measures are applicable for review. For example, measures associated with neighborhood design are likely not applicable to employment generation land use projects, whereas trip reduction programs to reduce employee commute VMT would not be applicable to a residential land use project.

SCALE
It is important to note that measures can be applied at different scales or geographic levels. The Handbook states that, “some measures may only be applicable at the project-level, whereas others may be more appropriate within a broader planning context such as for a general plan or climate action plan.” The geographic levels considered in the Handbook include Project/Site and Plan/Community. Project/Site applies to measures that can reduce VMT at the scale of an individual development project or employer. Plan/Community refers to measures that reduce VMT at the scale of a specific plan, general plan or climate action plan. Transportation measures can be quantified at either the Project/Site scale or the Plan/Community scale, but never both.1

LOCATIONAL CONTEXT
The Handbook states locational context is “used to identify trip reduction measures within the transportation sector that are appropriate in certain types of neighborhoods differentiated by transportation characteristics and level of development (e.g., urban, rural, suburban).” More specifically, rural, suburban and urban are defined as follows:

Rural: An area characterized by little development. Compared to urban and suburban areas, rural areas have a lower density of residences, higher numbers of single-family residences, and higher numbers of vehicle dependent land use patterns. Where applicable, the Handbook provides three land use distinctions within the rural locational context category—Ra, Rb, and Rc.

Ra refers to rural areas within a master-planned community. These rural areas often include a broad offering of amenities and services, which may be accessed by walking or other alternative forms of transportation. Rb refers to rural areas adjacent to a commuter rail station with convenient rail service to a major employment center. As the name implies, these rural areas have greater access to commuter rail as an alternative mode of transportation. Rc refers to rural areas with transit service and that are near jobs/services.

Suburban: An area characterized by dispersed, low-density, single-use, automobile dependent land use patterns, usually outside of the central city. Also known as a suburb.

Urban: An area located within the central city with higher density land uses than in the suburbs.

Often characterized by multi-family housing, tall office buildings and dense retail.

The Project’s locational context is determined to be suburban.

TRANSPORTATION MEASURES
As noted in the Handbook, transportation measures “promote transit and alternative transportation, support use of alternatively fueled vehicles, or encourage land use planning 1 Handbook, Page 37
3195
Tracy Zinn, T&B Planning, Inc.

November 21, 2023

Page 3 of 4 ends

14539-01 VMT - Mitigation
practices that reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Measures within the transportation sector are separated into six subsectors: Land Use, Neighborhood Design, Parking or Road Pricing Management, Transit, Trip Reduction Programs, and Clean Vehicles and Fuels.”2 For the purposes of this evaluation, the Trip Reduction Programs subsector is most applicable to reducing employee commute VMT and would apply to the Project’s industrial land use.

TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAMS SUBSECTOR
Attachment A lists the measures within the Trip Reduction Programs subsector (i.e., T-5 through T-13 and T-23) as described in the Handbook along with each measure’s applicability to the Project. As the Project is being developed as a speculative building without a known tenant (i.e., employer), measures associated with commute trip reduction (CTR) programs and their related commute trip reduction strategies (e.g., have been excluded as they are not quantifiable, nor can their implementation be guaranteed and enforced.

The Project does have the ability to provide design features that would promote non-motorized transportation alternatives such as measure T-10 End-of-Trip Bicycle Facilities.

T-10 END-OF-TRIP BICYCLE FACILITIES
Measure T-10 Provide End-of-Trip Bicycle Facilities is listed in the Handbook as available to projects in a suburban setting. As described in the Handbook, “the measure will install and maintain end-of-trip facilities for employee use. End-of-trip facilities include bike parking, bike lockers, showers, and personal lockers. The provision and maintenance of secure bike parking and related facilities encourages commuting by bicycle, thereby reducing VMT and GHG emissions.”3 The Fact Sheet for T-10 Provide End-of-Trip Bicycle Facilities was utilized to calculate the Project’s potential VMT reduction.

TABLE 2: T-10 CALCULATION VARIABLES
ID Variable Value Unit Source
A
Percent reduction in GHG emissions from project/site
employee commute VMT 0.1-4.4 % calculated
User Inputs
None
Constants, Assumptions, and Available Defaults
B Bike mode adjustment factor

1.78 or

4.861 unitless Buehler 2012
C Existing bicycle trip length for all trips in region 2.2 miles FHWA 2017a D Existing vehicle trip length for all trips in region 11.7 miles FHWA 2017a E Existing bicycle mode share for work trips in region 0.4 % FHWA 2017b F Existing vehicle mode share for work trips in region 95.3 % FHWA 2017b 1The bike mode adjustment factor should be provided by the user based on type of bike facility. A study found that commuters with showers, lockers, and bike parking at work are associated with 4.86 times greater likelihood to commute by bicycle when compared to individuals without any bicycle facilities at work. Individuals with bike parking, but no showers and lockers at the workplace, are associated with 1.78 times greater likelihood to cycle to work than those without trip-end facilities.

𝐴𝐴 = 𝐶𝐶 × �𝐸𝐸 − (𝐵𝐵 × 𝐸𝐸)�
𝐷𝐷 × 𝐹𝐹
2 Handbook, Page 30
3 Handbook, Page 133
3196
Tracy Zinn, T&B Planning, Inc.

November 21, 2023

Page 4 of 4 ends

14539-01 VMT - Mitigation

0.1% = 2.2 × �0.4% − (1.78 × 0.4%)�

11.7 × 95.3%
The Project will include building elements for bicycle trip end facilities (i.e., parking) for commuters that choose to bicycle as a mode of travel. This will promote an alternative mode choice of commuting for employees. As calculated, the Project will reduce VMT by 0.1%.

TOTAL VMT REDUCTIONS
The 2021 Handbook states that effectiveness levels for multiple measures within a subsector may be multiplied to determine a combined effectiveness level. Because the combination of measures and independence of measures are complicated, the 2021 Handbook recommends that measure reductions within a subsector be multiplied unless the user can provide substantial evidence indicating that emission reductions are independent of one another and that they should therefore be added. Each subsector has a maximum allowable reduction. These were derived by combining the maximum allowable reduction of each individual non–mutually-exclusive measure within the subsector. As all the Project Design features above fall under the Subsector of “Trip Reduction Programs”, the 2021 Handbook states that the “Trip Reduction Subsector” has a maximum reduction of 45%. Therefore, a project cannot exceed the maximum allowable reduction. 2021 Handbook provides the following equation for combining Subsector reductions:

𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆 = 1 − [(1 − 𝐴𝐴) × (1 − 𝐵𝐵) × (1 − 𝐶𝐶) … ] Project’s VMT reduction are as follows:

0.1% = 1 − [(1 − 0.1%)]
As outlined through the VMT reduction calculations presented above, with the inclusion of the VMT mitigation measure the Project is estimated to reduce its VMT impact by 0.1%, which would continue to exceed the City’s VMT impact threshold.

Even with the inclusion of feasible VMT reduction measures, the Project is not able to reduce project generated VMT to a level of less than significant.

If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [email protected]. 3197
14539-01 VMT - Mitigation

REFERENCES

1. CAPCOA. Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity . December 2021. 3198
14539-01 VMT - Mitigation

ATTACHMENT A

TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAMS SUBSECTOR
3199
14539-01 VMT - Mitigation
TABLE A-1: TRIP REDUCTION PROGRAMS SUBSECTOR
Subsector Measure Scale of
Application
Applicable
Locational
Context
Applicability to Project
Trip
Reduction
Programs
T-5 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program (Voluntary) This measure will implement a voluntary commute trip reduction (CTR) program with employers.

Project/
Site
Urban,
Suburban
Reduction is not quantifiable
nor enforceable due to a
speculative building with an
unknown employer.

T-6 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program (Mandatory Implementation and Monitoring)
This measure will implement a mandatory CTR program with employers. CTR programs discourage single-occupancy vehicle trips and encourage alternative modes of transportation such as carpooling, taking transit, walking, and biking, thereby reducing VMT and GHG emissions.

Project/
Site
Urban,
Suburban
Reduction is not quantifiable
nor enforceable due to a
speculative building with an
unknown employer.

T-7 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Marketing
This measure will implement a marketing strategy to promote the project site employer’s CTR program. Information sharing and marketing promote and educate employees about their travel choices to the employment location beyond driving such as carpooling, taking transit, walking, and biking, thereby reducing VMT and GHG emissions.

Project/
Site
Urban,
Suburban
Reduction is not quantifiable
nor enforceable due to a
speculative building with an
unknown employer.

T-8 Provide Ridesharing Program
This measure will implement a ridesharing program and establish a permanent transportation management association with funding requirements for employers.

Project/
Site
Urban,
Suburban
Reduction is not quantifiable
nor enforceable due to a
speculative building with an
unknown employer.

T-9 Implement Subsidized or Discounted Transit Program
This measure will provide subsidized or discounted, or free transit passes for employees and/or residents.

Project/
Site
Urban,
Suburban
Reduction is not quantifiable
nor enforceable due to a
speculative building with an
unknown employer.

T-10 Provide End-of-Trip Bicycle Facilities
This measure will install and maintain end-of-trip facilities for employee use. End-oftrip facilities include bike parking, bike lockers, showers, and personal lockers.

Project/
Site
Urban,
Suburban Applicable and Quantifiable
T-11 Provide Employer-Sponsored Vanpool
This measure will implement an employer-sponsored vanpool service. Vanpooling is a flexible form of public transportation that provides groups of 5 to 15 people with a cost-effective and convenient rideshare option for commuting.

Project/
Site
Urban,
Suburban,
Rural
Reduction is not quantifiable
nor enforceable due to a
speculative building with an
unknown employer.

T-12 Price Workplace Parking
This measure will price onsite parking at workplaces. Because free employee parking is a common benefit, charging employees to park onsite increases the cost of choosing to drive to work
Project/
Site
Urban,
Suburban
Reduction is not quantifiable
nor enforceable due to a
speculative building with an
unknown employer.

T-13 Implement Employee Parking Cash-Out
This measure will require project employers to offer employee parking cash-out.

Cash-out is when employers provide employees with a choice of forgoing their current subsidized/free parking for a cash payment equivalent to or greater than the cost of the parking space. This encourages employees to use other modes of travel instead of single occupancy vehicles.

Project/
Site
Urban,
Suburban
Reduction is not quantifiable
nor enforceable due to a
speculative building with an
unknown employer.

T-23 Provide Community-Based Travel Planning
This measure will target residences in the plan/community with community-based travel planning (CBTP). CBTP is a residential-based approach to outreach that provides households with customized information, incentives, and support to encourage the use of transportation alternatives in place of single occupancy vehicles.

Plan/
Community
Urban,
Suburban
Does not apply at the
Project/Site scale.

Source: Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity , California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), December 2021.

Notes:

1. Per CAPCOA Handbook, the combined maximum for each subsector or total across subsectors is calculated as:
1 - ((1-A)*(1-B)*(1-C)*(1-D)... ); where, A, B, C, and D... represent the percent reduction for individual measures or subsectors. 3200
AIRPORT DRIVE (PUBLIC) PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL BUILDING FFE = 982.50 SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD DRIVEWAY #2 DRIVEWAY #1 CITY OF ONTARIO 5355 AIRPORT DRIVE TRUCK TURNING EXHIBIT 3201
Washington
Issaquah | Bellingham | Seattle
Oregon
Portland | Baker City
California
Oakland | Irvine
Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
5355 East Airport Drive
Ontario, California
Submitted by:

Farallon Consulting, L.L.C.
27 Mauchly, Suite 213
Irvine, California 92618
Farallon PN: 1071-080 (Task 2)
For:

Prologis, Inc.

Pier 1, Bay 1
San Francisco, California 94111
December 13, 2022
Prepared by:

Peter Sims, P.G.

Associate Geologist
Reviewed by:

Kathy Lehnus, P.G.

Senior Geologist
3202
i P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 1-1

2.0 SITE BACKGROUND ...................................................................................... 2-1

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 2-1

2.2 SITE HISTORY ....................................................................................... 2-1

2.3 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS ............................................................ 2-2

3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ...................................................................................... 3-1

3.1 TOPOGRAPHY ....................................................................................... 3-1

3.2 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY .................................................. 3-1

4.0 ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ...................................... 4-1

4.1 SCOPE OF WORK .................................................................................. 4-1

4.1.1 Health and Safety Plan Preparation ............................................. 4-1

4.1.2 Underground Utility Clearance .................................................... 4-1

4.1.3 Boring Advancement ................................................................... 4-1

4.1.4 Soil Gas Probe Installation and Sampling ................................... 4-2

4.2 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SOIL GAS .............. 4-2

4.3 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE ................................................. 4-3

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................... 5-1

6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 6-1

7.0 LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................. 7-1

7.1 GENERAL LIMITATIONS .................................................................... 7-1

7.2 LIMITATION ON RELIANCE BY THIRD PARTIES ......................... 7-1 3203
ii P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

FIGURES
Figure 1 Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 Site Plan and Sampling Locations
Figure 3 PCE in Soil Gas
TABLES
Table 1 Sampling Rationale
Table 2 Cumulative Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Table 3 Cumulative Summary of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil Table 4 Cumulative Summary of Metals in Soil
Table 5 Cumulative Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Vapor

APPENDICES
Appendix A Boring Logs
Appendix B Laboratory Analytical Reports
Appendix C Waste Manifests
3204
1-1 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Farallon Consulting, L.L.C. (Farallon) has prepared this Additional Subsurface Investigation Report (Investigation Report) for Prologis, Inc. (Prologis) to present the results from the subsurface investigation conducted in September 2022 at the property at 5355 East Airport Drive in Ontario, California (herein referred to as the Site) (Figure 1). The scope of work for this subsurface investigation was based on the recognized environmental conditions and subsurface investigation findings identified in the Phase I/Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report, 5355 East Airport Drive, Ontario, California dated March 31, 2022 prepared by Farallon (2022a) for Prologis (Phase I/II Report). The potential for constituents of concern (COCs) to be present in Site subsurface media was identified as a recognized environmental condition due to petroleum underground storage tanks (USTs) formerly present in three areas, former and active septic systems, and a vehicle maintenance garage ("Building B" on Figure 2).

The Phase I/II Report summarized the subsurface investigation conducted by Farallon in March 2022 and a sampling event previously conducted at the Site. Tetrachloroethene (PCE) was detected at concentrations exceeding calculated industrial screening levels using a 0.03 attention factor in soil gas in several areas. Additional investigation was recommended to address the potential for vapor intrusion conditions at the warehouse proposed for construction at the Site. This additional subsurface investigation was conducted to provide that additional investigation. The scope of work for the additional subsurface investigation was presented in Work Change Order 1071-080-WCO 0031 and the general locations, depths, rationale for the borings, and analytes are shown in Table 1.

This Investigation Report has been organized into the following sections:
• Section 2, Site Background, provides a description of the Site, and summarizes pertinent background information regarding its history and previous investigations conducted at the Site.
• Section 3, Physical Setting, describes the topography, geology, and hydrogeology of the Site.
• Section 4, Additional Subsurface Investigation, provides a description of the scope of work conducted as part of the additional subsurface investigation, and a summary of soil gas analytical results and the handling of investigation-derived waste. • Section 5, Conclusions and Recommendations, presents Farallon’s conclusions from the additional subsurface investigation, and recommendations based on the results. • Section 6, References, provides a list of the documents cited in this Additional Subsurface Investigation Report.
• Section 7, Limitations, presents Farallon’s standard limitations applicable to this Additional Subsurface Investigation Report.
1 Work Change Order 1071-080-WCO 003, Master Services Agreement, Farallon Consulting, L.L.C. and Prologis, Inc. dated September 12,2022 between Gavin Polite Fisco of Prologis and Scott Allin of Farallon (2022b). 3205
2-1 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

2.0 SITE BACKGROUND
This section provides a description of the Site, and summarizes pertinent background information regarding its history and previous investigations conducted at the Site.

2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION
The Site consists of two parcels totaling 14.2 acres: San Bernardino County Assessor Parcel Nos. 0238-052-20 (Eastern Parcel), and 0238-052-29 (Western Parcel). The Eastern Parcel is occupied by Verhoeven, a grain-processing company, and is developed with five buildings, grain storage silos, and a grain mill area. An office and warehouse building, referred to as “Building A,” is located on the southern portion of the Site. The warehouse portion on the northeastern side of Building A contains a service shop used to repair machinery related to the grain mill. A maintenance shop, referred to as “Building B,” is present on the eastern portion of the Site, and is used for light tractor and forklift services. Additional structures on the Eastern Parcel consist of a warehouse referred to as “Building C” on the north-central portion, used for assorted storage, and two grain storage structures on the southeastern and southwestern portions of the parcel, referred to as Buildings D and E, respectively.

The Western Parcel is occupied by The Scoular Company, a corn storage and distribution facility.

The Western Parcel contains exterior grain storage areas, and an office trailer that contains a small hazardous substances storage area on secondary containment.

The Site is primarily asphalt-paved, with some gravel-paved areas on the western parcel. Access to the Site is gained from East Airport Drive, south of the Site.

A vehicle wash-down area with a sump is present on the northeastern portion of the Eastern Parcel.

Three or four septic systems are associated with the Site: two or three on the Eastern Parcel, and one on the Western Parcel. The location of the septic system on the Western Parcel could not be determined from the records reviewed. A 499-gallon propane aboveground storage tank (AST), two 250-gallon diesel fuel ASTs, and a 220-gallon hydraulic oil AST are present on the Eastern Parcel. Two 12,000-gallon “fuel-storage” USTs formerly were located on the north-central portion of the Site near the grain mill area. A 12,000-gallon diesel fuel UST formerly was located southeast of Building C. The area west of Building B was identified as the location of one or more additional USTs.

2.2 SITE HISTORY
The Site was used as agricultural or grazing land from at least the late 1930s to the early 1970s.

By 1973, the Eastern Parcel was developed with small grain storage silos and other features associated with milling operations in the grain mill area. By 1975, grain appeared to be stockpiled in Buildings A through C, located on the southwestern portion of the Site. By 1985 grain storage structures Buildings D and E had been developed. By 2002, grain processing operations at the Site 3206
2-2 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com had expanded to the Western Parcel, which included the development of three large grain storage silos. The Site has appeared in its current configuration since 2002.

Site occupants have consisted of Verhoeven from 1973 to the present; Chino Grain and Milling, Inc. in 1985; Coast Grain Company from 1990 to 2003; The Scoular Company between 2004 and the present; and JD Heistell and Company in 2009.

2.3 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS
Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) prepared a Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report dated August 16, 2016 documenting an investigation conducted at the Site, which included an assessment to identify former on-Site USTs or associated features and reported septic systems, and soil and soil gas sampling to assess for indications of a release from historical Site activities.

A geophysical survey was conducted to identify USTs remaining in-place, backfilled tank holds, septic tanks, and/or associated features, and to clear boring locations of utilities. One large anomaly indicative of a backfilled excavation was identified under the western canopy of Building B, which generally corresponds to the location of a former UST area. No large metallic features were identified, so Partner concluded that USTs formerly present in this area had been removed. One large anomaly resembling a septic system was identified north of Building A.

As part of the soil and soil gas sampling, 26 borings were advanced at depths of between 1 and 25 feet below ground surface (bgs) for collection of soil and/or soil gas samples. Soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbon carbon chain C6-C40 (TPH-cc) by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8015C and for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260B. Soil gas samples were analyzed for VOCs by either EPA Methods TO-15 or 8260B. No detectable concentrations of VOCs or TPH-cc were present in the soil samples. VOCs, including PCE, trichloroethene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes, were detected in soil gas samples at concentrations less than residential and commercial/industrial calculated soil gas screening levels in effect at the time the report was completed. Partner concluded that a discernable vapor intrusion condition did not appear to exist at the Site, and that the detections of VOCs in soil gas did not represent a threat to human health or the environment. Partner recommended no further investigation with respect to the on-Site grain-handling facility at the time of the report.

Although the reported concentrations of VOCs in soil gas were less than soil gas screening levels in effect in 2016 at the time the Partner report was prepared, in April 2020, California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Human and Ecological Risk Office (2020) Human Health Risk Assessment Note Number 3 (HHRA Note 3) was updated with the more-conservative attenuation factor of 0.03 for use in screening level calculations. PCE concentrations in soil gas samples collected from sampling locations B5, B6, and SV-14 through SV-16 in 2016 exceeded the calculated soil gas commercial/industrial screening level of 67 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) using the calculated screening level for PCE with the 0.03 attenuation factor. Additionally, the ethylbenzene concentration in one soil gas sample (B4-SG, located west of Building B) exceeded the calculated commercial/industrial screening level of 163 µg/m3 using the “low level” screening level for ethylbenzene. These samples were collected west of and beneath Building B at a depth of 4 to 5 feet bgs.
3207
2-3 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com As part of its Phase I/II due diligence investigation, Farallon conducted soil and soil gas sampling at the Site in March 2022, focusing on assessing former UST areas and septic systems, and the proposed new building footprint for the potential for vapor intrusion issues. At the time of the assessment, Farallon was informed that an approximately 250,000-square-foot warehouse would be constructed on the north-central portion of the Site (Figure 2). The scope of work for the Phase II ESA portion of the investigation included advancement of 12 borings, installation of two subslab gas probes, and installation of 10 temporary soil gas probe locations with single- or multi-depth nested gas points for collection of soil and soil gas samples.

Petroleum hydrocarbons and VOCs were not detected at a concentration exceeding laboratory reporting limits in the soil samples. Concentrations of metals either were not detected at a concentration exceeding laboratory reporting limits or were detected at concentrations less than screening levels. Results from the laboratory analyses of the March 2022 sampling event are summarized in Tables 2 through 5. Table 5 also include results from the current round of sampling (September 2022) which is the subject of this report.

Soil gas data indicated that PCE was present at concentrations exceeding calculated industrial screening levels using the 0.03 attenuation factor in soil gas samples collected west of and beneath Building B (samples SS-1, SS-2, SVP-7, and SVP-8), proximate to the former location of the 12,000-gallon diesel fuel UST (sample SVP-5), proximate to the former location of the two 12,000-gallon USTs (sample SVP-1), and proximate to the vehicle washdown area with sump (sample SVP-6). These locations were mapped beneath the planned new building footprint. PCE also was detected at concentrations less than the calculated industrial screening levels in in soil gas in other soil gas samples collected at the Site. The extent of PCE in soil gas was not fully characterized.

In the Phase I/II Report, Farallon recommended that a Media Management Plan be prepared for use during Site redevelopment to address any unexpected impacts to soil associated with historical activities at the Site. Farallon also recommended additional investigation to delineate and design mitigation measures for PCE in soil gas that may impact indoor air in the planned new building at the Site.
3208
3-1 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING
The topography, geology, and hydrogeology of the Site are described in this section.

3.1 TOPOGRAPHY
Farallon reviewed the U.S. Geological Survey topographic map for Guasti, California, dated 2018 provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. The map depicts the Site at an elevation of approximately 980 feet above mean sea level. Site topography slopes gently downward to the south. Regional topography generally is sloped downward to the south.

3.2 GEOLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY
The Site is situated in the San Bernadino Valley of the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province in Southern California. The Peninsular Ranges Province is bounded by the San Gabriel and San Bernardino mountains to the north, the Colorado Desert to the east, extends into lower California beyond the Mexican border to the south, and is bound by the Pacific Ocean to the west. The San Bernardino Mountains are approximately 7 miles north of the Site.

According to the Partner (2016) Phase II Report, soil beneath the Site generally consists of very fine-grained silty sand from the surface to a depth of approximately 20 feet bgs and transitions to very fine- to coarse-grained poorly graded sand between depths of 20 and 25 feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered during Partner’s investigation.

Soil encountered during the Phase II ESA, described in the Phase I/II Report, and during the September 2022 additional subsurface investigation was described as silty fine to medium sand to the total explored depth of 10 feet bgs, with an apparent coarse sand and gravel layer at a depth of 10 feet bgs (and as shallow as 5 feet bgs on the eastern portion of the Site at boring SB-2), and intermittent clayey sand to clay lenses approximately 1 foot thick at a depth of between 6 and 7 feet bgs (borings SVP-16 and SVP-19) and 10 to 11 feet bgs (borings SVP-12 and SVP-16).

Groundwater was not encountered during drilling. Boring logs are provided in Appendix A.

Site-specific groundwater direction and depth information was not available in the records reviewed. Based on information obtained from the previous reports California State Water Resources Control Board (2022) GeoTracker database and topographic interpretation, groundwater beneath the Site is anticipated to be encountered at a depth of approximately 250 feet bgs, and is estimated to flow to the south.
3209
4-1 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

4.0 ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION
This section presents the scope of work for the additional subsurface investigation conducted at the Site in September 2022, and summarizes the results from soil gas sampling and analysis. The handling of waste generated during the additional subsurface investigation also is discussed.

4.1 SCOPE OF WORK
Before field work was initiated, a Site-specific Health and Safety Plan (HASP) was prepared, and underground utilities were cleared. Field work consisted of advancing borings and collecting soil gas samples at the Site to provide a better understanding of soil gas impacts detected during previous subsurface investigations. The following sections detail this scope of work.

4.1.1 Health and Safety Plan Preparation
A Site-specific HASP was required under Section 3202 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (8 CCR 3202) for all field activities due to the potential for exposure to hazardous substances. Prior to commencement of field activities, Farallon prepared a HASP compliant with the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and 8 CCR 3203. Personal protection equipment precautions related to COVID-19 were implemented for Farallon personnel during field activities in accordance with Farallon health and safety policy.

4.1.2 Underground Utility Clearance
Prior to commencement of drilling activities, Farallon marked the proposed boring locations at the Site and contacted Dig Alert for public utility notice. Farallon also engaged a private utility location service to pre-screen the proposed boring locations for utilities that may be encountered during advancement using hand tools.

4.1.3 Boring Advancement
Nine borings, designated SVP-11 through SVP-19, were advanced at the Site on September 16, 2022 to investigate the potential presence of VOCs in soil gas beneath the planned new building footprint. The boring locations are shown on Figure 2 and were generally evenly distributed across the planned new building footprint, with selected borings placed in previously identified impacted areas. The borings were advanced using a hand-auger to a depth of 5 feet bgs, and a direct-push drill rig for the remaining depth. The general locations, depths, rationale for the borings, and analyte are shown in Table 1.

Continuous soil cores were visually inspected and screened by a Farallon geologist using a photoionization detector, and were described and logged using the United Soil Classification System (Modified). Physical evidence of soil impacts, including staining and odors, was not observed; photoionization detector readings ranged from 0.0 to 1.4 parts per million. Boring logs with soil descriptions are provided in Appendix A.
3210
4-2 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com Soil cuttings generated during drilling activities were containerized in a 55-gallon drum pending transport and disposal off the Site.

4.1.4 Soil Gas Probe Installation and Sampling
Following completion of boring advancement, Farallon converted the borings to temporary dualnested soil gas probes. Borings SVP-11 through SVP-19 were constructed with soil gas probes at depths of 4 and 10 feet bgs.

Soil gas probe installation was performed in accordance with the Advisory: Active Soil Gas Investigations dated July 2015 prepared by the California Environmental Protection Agency et al. (2015) (Soil Gas Advisory). The probes consisted of an Airstone microporous gas implant or equivalent connected to 0.25-inch-outside-diameter Nylaflow tubing, finished at the surface with temporary plugs. The annulus around the gas implant was backfilled with approximately 1 foot of screen-washed No. 3 sand, followed by 0.5 foot of dry granular bentonite, and hydrated granular bentonite to create a seal from the top of the dry granular bentonite to near surface. Soil gas probe construction is illustrated in the boring logs provided in Appendix A; their locations are shown on Figure 2.

The temporary dual-nested soil gas probes were allowed to equilibrate for 4 days prior to sample collection on September 20, 2022. Soil gas sampling, including observance of equilibration times, performance of shut-in tests, and purging activities, was conducted in accordance with the Soil Gas Advisory. A total of 19 soil gas samples (18 primary and 1 duplicate) were collected into 1- liter Summa canisters at a rate of 200 milliliters per minute or less. Isopropanol was used as a tracer gas, introduced to ambient air surrounding the sampling train by soaking a cotton swab with liquid isopropanol and placing it at the location where the gas probe tubing exited the ground.

Upon completion of sample collection, soil gas samples were transported under chain-of-custody protocols to a California-certified laboratory, and were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260B with TO-15 detection limits, where attainable. The soil vapor probes were then abandoned by filling the probe with bentonite grout as practicable and removing.

4.2 SUMMARY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR SOIL GAS
The soil gas analytical results were compared to DTSC Screening Levels (SLs) for indoor air, EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for indoor air, and the San Francisco Water Quality Control Board (SFWQCB) Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for TPH-g, which were adjusted using suggested attenuation factors provided in the Vapor Intrusion Guidance prepared by DTSC and the California Environmental Protection Agency (2011). The attenuation factor used for this comparison was 0.001 for soil gas in industrial use settings. Farallon also used the more-conservative attenuation factor of 0.03 for “near-source” exterior soil gas published in HHRA Note 3.
3211
4-3 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com A summary of soil gas analytical results from the September 2022 and historical Farallon investigations is provided in Table 5. Soil gas analytical results from the additional subsurface investigation are summarized below:
• The tracer gas isopropanol was not detected at a concentration exceeding laboratory reporting limits in the soil gas samples collected from the soil gas probes. • PCE was not detected at a concentration exceeding the laboratory reporting limit of 25 μg/m3 in the soil gas samples collected from the soil gas probes; the laboratory reporting limit was less than calculated screening levels using the 0.03 attenuation factor published in HHRA Note 3, the most-conservative attenuation factor for “near-source” exterior soil gas samples.
• Ethylbenzene and total xylenes were detected at concentrations exceeding laboratory reporting limits in the two soil gas samples collected from soil gas probe location SVP-16, which was installed in the vicinity of a gravel roadway under the new planned building.

The detected concentrations are less than calculated commercial/industrial screening levels using the 0.03 attenuation factor published in HHRA Note 3, the most-conservative attenuation factor for “near-source” exterior soil gas samples.

Because some soil gas samples collected in September 2022 were proximate to areas that showed impacts in March 2022 but no impacts were detected in September 2022, Farallon worked with the original analytical laboratory to conduct a data quality review of both analytical data sets. No anomalies in the data sets were found to render the data from either event unusable. Laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix B. Because no COCs were detected in the duplicate sampling pair, laboratory reproducibility could not be evaluated.

4.3 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE
Soil cuttings were containerized in a 55-gallon drum at the Site. The contents were characterized as nonhazardous, and were transported off the Site for disposal. Copies of the waste disposal documentation are provided in Appendix C.
3212
5-1 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Farallon conducted an additional subsurface investigation in September 2022 to further investigate impacts of VOCs previously identified in soil gas beneath the planned new building footprint at the Site. Previous soil gas data indicated that PCE was present at concentrations exceeding calculated industrial screening levels using the 0.03 attenuation factor in soil gas samples collected beneath and proximate to the planned new building footprint, specifically west of and beneath Building B, proximate to the former location of the 12,000-gallon diesel fuel UST, proximate to the former location of two 12,000 gallon USTs, and proximate to the vehicle washdown area with sump. PCE also was detected at concentrations less than the calculated industrial screening levels in soil gas in other soil gas samples collected at the Site. It was determined that the extent of PCE impacts to soil gas at the Site had not been fully characterized.

For the September 2022 additional subsurface investigation, nine borings were advanced in the planned new building footprint. Soil gas probes were generally evenly distributed across the planned new building footprint, with selected probes placed in previously identified impacted areas. The borings were converted to temporary dual-nested soil gas probes at depths of 4 and 10 feet bgs. No detectable concentrations of PCE exceeding the laboratory reporting limit of 25 μg/m3 were identified during laboratory analysis of soil gas samples collected during this additional subsurface investigation. Concentrations of other, gasoline-related, VOCs, which may be attributable to road current use, did not exceed the calculated screening levels using the mostconservative 0.03 attenuation factor in soil gas samples collected during this additional subsurface investigation.

This additional subsurface investigation did not indicate that the previously identified PCE impacts to soil gas are present in the areas that were resampled, and did not identify additional areas under the proposed building slab. Farallon recommends that the the areas of highest impact previously encountered under the proposed building slab be resampled to aide in the determination of whether mitigation measures are recommended for the proposed building. 3213
6-1 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

6.0 REFERENCES
California Department of Toxic Substances Control, Human and Ecological Risk Office. 2020.

Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA) Note Number 3, DTSC-modified Screening Levels (DTSC-SLs). June.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control, and California Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Guidance for the Evaluation and Mitigation of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air (Vapor Intrusion Guidance). Final. October.

California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control, Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, and San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2015. Advisory: Active Soil Gas Investigations. July.

California State Water Resources Control Board. 2022. GeoTracker Database Search. <GeoTracker (ca.gov)>. (November 2022.)
Farallon Consulting, L.L.C. (Farallon). 2022a. Phase I/Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Report, 5355 East Airport Drive, Ontario, California. Prepared for Prologis, Inc.

March 31.
———. 2022b. Work Change Order 1071-080-WCO 003, Master Services Agreement, Farallon Consulting, L.L.C. and Prologis, Inc. Between Gavin Polite Fisco, Prologis, Inc. and Scott Allin, Farallon Consulting, L.L.C. September 12.

Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 2016. Phase II Subsurface Investigation Report, 5355 East Airport Drive, Ontario, California 91761. Prepared for Prologis. August 16. 3214
7-1 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com

7.0 LIMITATIONS

7.1 GENERAL LIMITATIONS
The conclusions contained in this report/assessment are based on professional opinions with regard to the subject matter. These opinions have been arrived at in accordance with currently accepted hydrogeologic and engineering standards and practices applicable to this location. The conclusions contained herein are subject to the following inherent limitations:
• Accuracy of Information. Farallon obtained, reviewed, and evaluated certain information used in this report/assessment from sources that were believed to be reliable. Farallon’s conclusions, opinions, and recommendations are based in part on such information.

Farallon’s services did not include verification of its accuracy or authenticity. Should the information upon which Farallon relied prove to be inaccurate or unreliable, Farallon reserves the right to amend or revise its conclusions, opinions, and/or recommendations. • Reconnaissance and/or Characterization. Farallon performed a reconnaissance and/or characterization of the Site that is the subject of this report/assessment to document current conditions. Farallon focused on areas deemed more likely to exhibit hazardous materials conditions. Contamination may exist in other areas of the Site that were not investigated or were inaccessible. Site activities beyond Farallon’s control could change at any time after the completion of this report/assessment.

For the foregoing reasons, Farallon cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the Site is free of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances or conditions, or that latent or undiscovered conditions will not become evident in the future. Farallon’s observations, findings, and opinions can be considered valid only as of the date of the report.

This report/assessment has been prepared in accordance with the contract for services between Farallon and Prologis, Inc. and currently accepted industry standards. No other warranties, representations, or certifications are made.

7.2 LIMITATION ON RELIANCE BY THIRD PARTIES
Reliance by third parties is prohibited. This report/assessment has been prepared for the exclusive use of Prologis, Inc. to address the unique needs of Prologis, Inc. at the Site at a specific point in time.

This is not a general grant of reliance. No one other than Prologis, Inc. may rely on this report unless Farallon agrees in advance to such reliance in writing. Any unauthorized use, interpretation, or reliance on this report/assessment is at the sole risk of that party, and Farallon will have no liability for such unauthorized use, interpretation, or reliance. 3215
P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx

FIGURES

ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
5355 East Airport Drive
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080 (Task 2)
3216
Checked By: PS Disc Reference:

FARALLON PN: 1071-080-002
³ SITE VICINITY MAP
5355 EAST AIRPORT DRIVE

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
Washington
Issaquah | Bellingham | Seattle
Oregon
Portland | Baker City
California
CONSULTING Oakland | Irvine
Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com Farallon
Drawn By: lmurock Date: 10/5/2022
Q:\Projects\1071 Prologis\080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 Airport Dr\Mapfiles\SSI_2022-10\Figure-01_SiteVicinity.mxd FIGURE 1
REFERENCE: 7.5 MINUTE USGS QUADRANGLE GUASTI, CALIFORNIA, DATED 2013 0 5,000

SCALE IN FEET
!(

ONTARIO

SITE LOCATION
3217
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, Maxar,
Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User
Community
"/
"/
"/
")T
")T
")T
!
!
!
R""
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
!
R""
! R""!
!
R""
R"" !
R""!
R"" !
!
!!(
R"" R"" R""
! !(
! R""
! R""
R""
!
! !
R""
R""
R""
R""
! R"" R""
!
P
P
P
P
P

P P P P P
P
P P
P P P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P P
P

EAST AIRPORT DRIVE
G
BUILDING E;

GRAIN STORAGE
G
BUILDING A;

OFFICES/WAREHOUSE

WESTERN PARCEL EASTERN PARCEL
GBUILDING D:

GRAIN STORAGE
G
BUILDING B;

MAINTENANCE/VEHICLE

REPAIR SHOP
G

FORMER UST AREA
GRAIN

STORAGE
G
BUILDING C;

WAREHOUSE
G
FORMER 12,000-GALLON

DIESEL UST (REMOVED)
G

VEHICLE WASH DOWN

AREA WITH SUMP G

TWO FORMER
12,000-GALLON USTs
(REMOVED)

RAIL LINE
SV-24
SV-26
SV-22
B9 SV-23 SV-19 SV-13
SVP-13
SV-25
B7 B1
SVP-9
B3
B2
SV-21 B8 SVP-18 SVP-8
B4
SV-16
SV-17
SVP-15 SV-20
SVP-19 B6
B5 SS-2
SVP-12 SVP-2 SVP-3 SVP-5
SVP-7
SV-14
SS-1
SV-15
SB-2
SV-18 SVP-10
SVP-11
B10
B11
SVP-14
SVP-4
SVP-16
SVP-6
SB-1
SVP-1
SVP-17
B12
³ CONSULTING
Checked By: PS Disc Reference:

FIGURE 2

SITE PLAN AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS
5355 EAST AIRPORT DRIVE

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com Farallon
0 100

SCALE IN FEET
Washington
Issaquah | Bellingham | Seattle
Oregon
Portland | Baker City
California
Oakland | Irvine
Drawn By: lmurock Date: 1/27/2023
Q:\Projects\1071 Prologis\080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 Airport Dr\Mapfiles\SSI_2022-10\Figure-02_SitePlan_SampleLocs.mxd FARALLON PN: 1071-080-002
LEGEND
R"" SOIL GAS PROBE (FARALLON, SEPTEMBER 2022)
R"" SOIL GAS PROBE (FARALLON, MARCH 2022)
!( SUBSLAB SOIL GAS PROBE (FARALLON, MARCH 2022)
!P BORING (FARALLON, MARCH 2022)
!P SOIL GAS PROBE (PARTNER, 2016)
"/ HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE AREA
")T TRANSFORMER

FORMER SITE FEATURE

OBSERVED TANK LOCATION

GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR SCAN AREA

PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT

SITE BOUNDARY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PARCEL BOUNDARY
ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.

FIGURES WERE PRODUCED IN COLOR.

GRAYSCALE COPIES MAY NOT
REPRODUCE ALL ORIGINAL INFORMATION.

GPR SURVEY AREA - 2022 (NO UST FOUND)
AST =
GPR =
UST =

ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK

GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR

UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
3218
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, Maxar,
Earthstar Geographics, and the GIS User
Community
"/
"/
"/
")T
")T
")T
!
!
!
R""
! ! !
! !
!
R""
! R""!
!
R""
R"" !
R""!
R"" !
!
!!(
R"" R"" R""
! !(
! R""
R""
R""
!
R""
R""
R""
R""
R"" R""
P
P
P
P P P
P P
P P P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P

EAST AIRPORT DRIVE
G
BUILDING E;

GRAIN STORAGE
G
BUILDING A;

OFFICES/WAREHOUSE

WESTERN PARCEL EASTERN PARCEL
GBUILDING D:

GRAIN STORAGE
G
BUILDING B;

MAINTENANCE/VEHICLE

REPAIR SHOP
G

FORMER UST AREA
GRAIN

STORAGE
G
BUILDING C;

WAREHOUSE
G
FORMER 12,000-GALLON

DIESEL UST (REMOVED)
G

VEHICLE WASH DOWN

AREA WITH SUMP G

TWO FORMER
12,000-GALLON USTs
(REMOVED)

RAIL LINE
SV-24
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100
SV-19
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100
SV-26
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100 B4
7/21/2016|5.0'|<350
SV-22
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100
SV-23
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100
B3
7/21/2016|5.0'|<350
SVP-9
3/11/2022|4.0'|24
SV-13
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100
SV-25
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100 SV-17
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100
SVP-13
9/20/2022|4.0'|<25
9/20/2022|10.0'|<25 B7
7/21/2016|5.0'|<6.9
SVP-15
9/20/2022|4.0'|<25
9/20/2022|10.0'|<25 SV-21
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100
B8
7/21/2016|5.0'|44
SVP-18
9/20/2022|4.0'|<25
9/20/2022|10.0'|<25
SVP-8
3/11/2022|4.0'|232
B5
7/21/2016|5.0'|100
SVP-12
9/20/2022|4.0'|<25
9/20/2022|10.0'|<25 SVP-2
3/11/2022|4.0'|27
SV-20
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100
SVP-19
9/20/2022|4.0'|<25
9/20/2022|10.0'|<25
B6
7/21/2016|5.0'|68
SS-2
3/11/2022|0.5'|194
SV-16
7/29/2016|4.0'|180
SVP-3
3/11/2022|4.0'|<20
SV-14
7/29/2016|4.0'|230
SVP-7
3/11/2022|4.0'|247 SS-1
3/11/2022|0.5'|220
SVP-11
9/20/2022|4.0'|<25
9/20/2022|10.0'|<25 SVP-5
3/11/2022|4.0'|70
3/11/2022|10.0'|234
SV-15
7/29/2016|5.0'|120
SVP-10
3/11/2022|4.0'|31
3/11/2022|8.0'|63
SVP-14
9/20/2022|4.0'|<25
9/20/2022|10.0'|<25 SVP-4
3/11/2022|4.0'|62
SV-18
7/29/2016|5.0'|<100
SVP-6
3/11/2022|4.0'|97
3/11/2022|8.0'|34
SVP-1
3/11/2022|4.0'|31
3/11/2022|10.0'|157
SVP-16
9/20/2022|4.0'|<25
9/20/2022|10.0'|<25
SVP-17
9/20/2022|4.0'|<25
9/20/2022|10.0'|<25

CONSULTING
Checked By: PS Disc Reference:

FIGURE 3

PCE IN SOIL VAPOR
5355 EAST AIRPORT DRIVE

ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
Your Challenges. Our Priority. | farallonconsulting.com Farallon
Washington
Issaquah | Bellingham | Seattle
Oregon
Portland | Baker City
California
Oakland | Irvine
Drawn By: lmurock Date: 2/3/2023
Q:\Projects\1071 Prologis\080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 Airport Dr\Mapfiles\SSI_2022-10\Figure-03_PCE_SV.mxd ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE. FARALLON PN: 1071-080-002 FIGURES WERE PRODUCED IN COLOR.

GRAYSCALE COPIES MAY NOT
REPRODUCE ALL ORIGINAL INFORMATION.
³ 0 100

SCALE IN FEET
LEGEND
R"" SOIL GAS PROBE (FARALLON, SEPTEMBER 2022)
R"" SOIL GAS PROBE (FARALLON, MARCH 2022)
!( SUBSLAB SOIL GAS PROBE (FARALLON, MARCH 2022)
!P SOIL GAS PROBE (PARTNER, 2016)
"/ HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE AREA
")T TRANSFORMER

FORMER SITE FEATURE

OBSERVED TANK LOCATION

GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR SCAN AREA

PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT

SITE BOUNDARY

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PARCEL BOUNDARY
AST =
GPR =
UST =
GPR SURVEY AREA - 2022 (NO UST FOUND)

ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK

GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR

UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
NOTES:

SAMPLE DATE, DEPTH, AND ANALYTICAL RESULTS AS:

SAMPLE DATE | SAMPLE DEPTH IN FEET BELOW GROUND SURFACE | PCE SOIL GAS ANALYTICAL RESULTS IN MICROGRAMS PER CUBIC METER.

BOLD =
< =
PCE =

DENOTES CONCENTRATIONS THAT EXCEED THE COMMERCIAL

SUBSLAB/SOIL GAS VAPOR INTRUSION ENVIRONMENTAL
SCREENING LEVEL.

DENOTES ANALYTE NOT DETECTED AT OR EXCEEDING THE
LISTED REPORTING LIMIT.

TETRACHLOROETHENE
3219
P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx TABLES

ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
5355 East Airport Drive
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080 (Task 2)
3220
Table 1
Sampling Rationale
5355 East Airport Road
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080-002
Sample ID Location Rationale Matrix to Be
Sampled
Boring
Depth
(feet bgs)
Proposed Sample Depth and
Analysis (feet bgs)
SVP-11 Planned New Building
Footprint
Assess the potential for soil vapor
under the future building Soil Vapor 10 4 feet PCE10 feet PCE SVP-12 Planned New Building
Footprint
Assess the potential for soil vapor
under the future building Soil Vapor 10 4 feet PCE10 feet PCE SVP-13 Planned New Building
Footprint
Assess the potential for soil vapor
under the future building Soil Vapor 10 4 feet PCE
10 feet PCE
SVP-14 Planned New Building
Footprint
Assess the potential for soil vapor
under the future building Soil Vapor 10 4 feet PCE
10 feet PCE
SVP-15 Planned New Building
Footprint
Assess the potential for soil vapor
under the future building Soil Vapor 10 4 feet PCE
10 feet PCE
SVP-16 Planned New Building
Footprint
Assess the potential for soil vapor
under the future building Soil Vapor 10 4 feet PCE
10 feet PCE
SVP-17 Planned New Building
Footprint
Assess the potential for soil vapor
under the future building Soil Vapor 10 4 feet PCE
10 feet PCE
SVP-18 Planned New Building
Footprint
Assess the potential for soil vapor
under the future building Soil Vapor 10 4 feet PCE
10 feet PCE
SVP-19 Planned New Building
Footprint
Assess the potential for soil vapor
under the future building Soil Vapor 10 4 feet PCE
10 feet PCE
NOTES:
bgs = below ground surface
PCE = tetrachloroethene
P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\Tables\1071-080_5355-EAirportDr_SSI_Tables_2023-01-27 1 of 1
3221
Table 2
Cumulative Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil 5355 East Airport Road
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080-002 PCE Benzene
TolueneEthylbenzeneTotal XylenesOther VOCs
B1 Partner B1-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 ND B2 Partner B2-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0044 < 0.0044 < 0.0044 < 0.0044 < 0.0131 ND B3 Partner B3-15 15.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0043 < 0.0043 < 0.0043 < 0.0043 < 0.0129 ND B4 Partner B4-10 10.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0044 < 0.0044 < 0.0044 < 0.0044 < 0.0132 ND B5 Partner B5-15 15.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0041 < 0.0041 < 0.0041 < 0.0041 < 0.0123 ND B6 Partner B6-10 10.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 ND B7 Partner B7-10 10.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0043 < 0.0043 < 0.0043 < 0.0043 < 0.013 ND B8 Partner B8-10 10.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0044 < 0.0044 < 0.0044 < 0.0044 < 0.0133 ND B9 Partner B9-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 ND B10 Partner B10-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 ND B11 Partner B11-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 ND B12 Partner B12-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.015 ND SB-1 Farallon SB-1-10' 10.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SB-2 Farallon SB-1-10' 10.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SVP-1 Farallon SVP-1-10' 10.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SVP-2 Farallon SVP-2-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SVP-3 Farallon SVP-3-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SVP-4 Farallon SVP-4-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SVP-5 Farallon SVP-5-10' 10.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND Farallon SVP-6-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND Farallon SVP-6-8' 8.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SVP-7 Farallon SVP-7-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SVP-8 Farallon SVP-8-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SVP-9 Farallon SVP-9-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND SVP-10 Farallon SVP-10-8' 8.0 3/4/2022 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0030 ND

2.7 1.4 5,300 25 2,500 Various
NOTES:
< denotes analyte not detected at or exceeding the reporting limit listed. Farallon = Farallon Consulting, LLC 1 Depth in feet below ground surface. ND = not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit Partner = Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.

PCE = Tetrachloroethene
RSL = Regional Screening Level
VOCs = volatile organic compounds
SVP-6
Commercial/Industrial Soil RSL3
2 Analyzed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260B. Only select VOCs shown in table; see lab reports for full list of analytes.
3 June 2020 (Revised May 2022) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs). If DTSC RSLs do not exist, November 2022 EPA RSLs were used and noted in blue text.

Analytical Results (milligrams per kilogram)2
Sample
Location Sampled By
Sample
Identification
Sample
Depth
(feet)1 Sample Date
P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\Tables\1071-080_5355-EAirportDr_SSI_Tables_2023-01-27 1 of 1
3222
Table 3
Cumulative Summary of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil 5355 East Airport Road
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080-002
TPH-g
(C4 - C12)
TPH-d
(C13 - C22)
TPH-o
(C23 - C40)
B1 Partner B1-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B2 Partner B2-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B3 Partner B3-15 15.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B4 Partner B4-10 10.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B5 Partner B5-15 15.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B6 Partner B6-10 10.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B7 Partner B7-10 10.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B8 Partner B8-10 10.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B9 Partner B9-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B10 Partner B10-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B11 Partner B11-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
B12 Partner B12-1 1.0 7/21/2016 < 10 < 10 < 10
SB-1 Farallon SB-1-10' 10.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0 SB-2 Farallon SB-1-10' 10.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0 SVP-1 Farallon SVP-1-10' 10.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0 SVP-2 Farallon SVP-2-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 --- ---
SVP-3 Farallon SVP-3-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 --- ---
SVP-4 Farallon SVP-4-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 --- ---
SVP-5 Farallon SVP-5-10' 10.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0 Farallon SVP-6-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0
Farallon SVP-6-8' 8.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0
SVP-7 Farallon SVP-7-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0 SVP-8 Farallon SVP-8-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0 SVP-9 Farallon SVP-9-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0 SVP-10 Farallon SVP-10-8' 8.0 3/4/2022 < 0.20 < 10.0 < 10.0 100 100 1,000
500 1,000 10,000
1,000 10,000 50,000
NOTES:
< denotes analyte not detected at or exceeding the reporting limit listed. C = carbon range (number of carbons) --- denotes sample not analyzed. Farallon = Farallon Consulting, LLC 1 Depth in feet below ground surface. MSSL = maximum soil screening level Partner = Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.

TPH-d = total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel
TPH-g = total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline
TPH-o = total petroleum hydrocarbons as oil
Analytical Results (milligrams per kilogram)2
MSSL ( < 20 feet Above Groundwater)3
SVP-6
3 Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board April 27, 2004 MSSLs for groundwater at depths of less than 20 feet, 20 to 150 feet, and greater than 150 feet below ground surface.

Sampled By
2 Analyzed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8015M (2022 samples) or 8015C (2016 samples).

MSSL (20-150 feet Above Groundwater)3
MSSL ( > 150 feet Above Groundwater)3
Sample
Location
Sample
Identification
Sample
Depth
(feet)1 Sample Date
P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\Tables\1071-080_5355-EAirportDr_SSI_Tables_2023-01-27 1 of 1
3223
Table 4
Cumulative Summary of Metals in Soil
5355 East Airport Road
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080-002
Barium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Copper Lead Nickel Vanadium Zinc Other
Metals
Farallon SVP-6-4' 4.0 3/4/2022 61.2 0.9 8.2 5.2 5.9 1.1 5.2 24.6 26.5 ND Farallon SVP-6-8' 8.0 3/4/2022 59.6 0.9 8.5 5.2 6.0 1.2 5.2 23.1 27.0 ND 15,000 7.1 NE 23 3,100 80 820 390 23,000 Various
220,000 79 NE 350 47,000 500 11,000 5,800 350,000 Various NOTES:
< denotes analyte not detected at or exceeding the reporting limit listed. Farallon = Farallon Consulting, LLC 1 Depth in feet below ground surface. ND = not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit RSL = Regional Screening Level 2
California Administrative Manual (CAM) Priority Pollutant List (PPL) 17 metals analyzed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 6010B by 3050B; mercury analyzed by EPA Method 7471A. Only detected analytes shown; see lab report for full list of analytes.
3 June 2020 (Revised May 2022) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Regional Screening Levels (RSLs). If DTSC RSLs do not exist, November 2022 EPA RSLs were used and noted in blue text.

Sampled By
Analytical Results (milligrams per kilogram)2
Residential Soil RSL3
Industrial Soil RSL3
Sample
Location
Sample
Identification
Sample
Depth
(feet) 1 Sample Date
SVP-6
P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\Tables\1071-080_5355-EAirportDr_SSI_Tables_2023-01-27 1 of 1
3224
Table 5
Cumulative Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Gas 5355 East Airport Road
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080-004
PCE TCE Cyclohexane
Trichlorofluoromethane
(Freon 11)
Dichloro
difluoromethane
(Freon 12) Ethylbenzene Toluene
Total
Xylenes
1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene
Carbon
Disulfide TPH-g Methane
Other
VOCs Tracer
SS-1 Farallon SS-1 0.5 3/11/2022 220 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 < 20 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- < 5,000 ND SS-2 Farallon SS-2 0.5 3/11/2022 194 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 < 20 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- < 5,000 ND B3 Partner B3-SG 5.0 7/21/2016 < 350 C < 270 C < 170 C < 290 C < 250 C < 220 C < 190 C 460 C < 250 C < 160 C --- --- ND C ND B4 Partner B4-SG 5.0 7/21/2016 < 350 C < 270 C < 170 C < 290 C < 250 C 280 C < 190 C 1,500 C < 250 C < 160 C --- --- ND C ND B5 Partner B5-SG 5.0 7/21/2016 100 < 5.5 < 3.5 < 5.7 < 5.0 < 4.4 < 3.8 12 < 5.0 < 3.2 --- --- ND ND B6 Partner B6-SG 5.0 7/21/2016 68 26 < 3.5 < 5.7 < 5.0 < 4.4 4.0 23.6 < 5.0 < 3.2 --- --- ND ND B7 Partner B7-SG 5.0 7/21/2016 < 6.9 < 5.5 < 3.5 < 5.7 < 5.0 11 4.9 92 < 5.0 < 3.2 --- --- ND ND B8 Partner B8-SG 5.0 7/21/2016 44 13 < 3.5 < 5.7 < 5.0 21 13 178 < 5.0 < 3.2 --- --- ND ND SV-13 Partner SV-13-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-14 Partner SV-14-4' 4.0 7/29/2016 230 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-15 Partner SV-15-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 120 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-16 Partner SV-16-4' 4.0 7/29/2016 180 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-17 Partner SV-17-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-18 Partner SV-18-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-19 Partner SV-19-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-20 Partner SV-20-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-21 Partner SV-21-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-22 Partner SV-22-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-23 Partner SV-23-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-24 Partner SV-24-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND SV-25 Partner SV-25-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND Partner SV-26-5' 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND Partner SV-26-5' Dup 5.0 7/29/2016 < 100 < 100 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 1,000 < 400 < 1,000 < 2,000 --- --- --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-1-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 31 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 21 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-1-10' 10.0 3/11/2022 157 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 21 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND SVP-2 Farallon SVP-2-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 27 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 34 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-3-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 < 20 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 78 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-3-4'REP 4.0 3/11/2022 < 20 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 45 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-4-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 62 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 80 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-4-4'REP 4.0 3/11/2022 57 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 46 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND 67 100 870,000 180,000 15,000 160 43,000 15,000 8,700 100,000 83,000 5%4 Calculated Industrial SGSL with 0.03 Attenuation Factor Varies Varies 3 Sample
Depth
(feet)1
Sample
Date
Subslab Soil Gas Samples
Soil Gas Samples
Sampled
By
SV-26
Sample
Location
Sample
Identification
Analytical Results (micrograms per cubic meter)2
SVP-1
SVP-4
SVP-3
P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\Tables\1071-080_5355-EAirportDr_SSI_Tables_2023-01-27 1 of 3
3225
Table 5
Cumulative Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Gas 5355 East Airport Road
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080-004
PCE TCE Cyclohexane
Trichlorofluoromethane
(Freon 11)
Dichloro
difluoromethane
(Freon 12) Ethylbenzene Toluene
Total
Xylenes
1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene
Carbon
Disulfide TPH-g Methane
Other
VOCs Tracer
Sample
Depth
(feet)1
Sample
Date
Sampled
By
Sample
Location
Sample
Identification
Analytical Results (micrograms per cubic meter)2
Farallon SVP-5-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 70 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 83 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-5-10' 10.0 3/11/2022 234 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 < 20 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-6-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 97 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 106 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-6-8' 8.0 3/11/2022 34 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 65 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND SVP-7 Farallon SVP-7-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 247 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 91 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND SVP-8 Farallon SVP-8-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 232 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 89 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND SVP-9 Farallon SVP-9-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 24 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 87 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-10-4' 4.0 3/11/2022 31 < 20 --- < 40 < 40 < 20 60 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-10-8' 8.0 3/11/2022 63 < 20 --- < 40 60 < 20 47 < 60 < 20 --- < 5,000 --- ND ND Farallon SVP-11-4 4.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 50 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-11-10 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 50 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-12-4 4.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 50 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-12-10 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-13-4 4.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-13-10 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-14-4 4.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-14-10 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-15-4 4.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-15-10 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-16-4 4.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 50 < 25 90 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-16-10 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 30 < 25 90 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-17-4 4.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-17-10 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-18-4 4.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-18-10 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-18-10-DUP 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND 67 100 870,000 180,000 15,000 160 43,000 15,000 8,700 100,000 83,000 5%4 Calculated Industrial SGSL with 0.03 Attenuation Factor Varies Varies 3 SVP-16
SVP-11
SVP-12
SVP-13
SVP-14
SVP-6
SVP-5
SVP-15
SVP-17
SVP-18
SVP-10
P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\Tables\1071-080_5355-EAirportDr_SSI_Tables_2023-01-27 2 of 3
3226
Table 5
Cumulative Summary of Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil Gas 5355 East Airport Road
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080-004
PCE TCE Cyclohexane
Trichlorofluoromethane
(Freon 11)
Dichloro
difluoromethane
(Freon 12) Ethylbenzene Toluene
Total
Xylenes
1,2,4-
Trimethylbenzene
Carbon
Disulfide TPH-g Methane
Other
VOCs Tracer
Sample
Depth
(feet)1
Sample
Date
Sampled
By
Sample
Location
Sample
Identification
Analytical Results (micrograms per cubic meter)2
Farallon SVP-19-4 4.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND Farallon SVP-19-10 10.0 9/20/2022 < 25 < 25 --- < 25 < 25 < 25 < 25 < 75 < 25 < 250 --- --- ND ND 67 100 870,000 180,000 15,000 160 43,000 15,000 8,700 100,000 83,000 5%4 Varies Varies NOTES:

C = sample was analyzed via TO-14 due to high concentration of analytes Farallon = Farallon Consulting, LLC
< denotes analyte not detected at or exceeding the reporting limit listed. ND = not detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit --- denotes sample not analyzed or not applicable. Partner = Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 1 Depth in feet below ground surface. PCE = tetrachloroethene SGSL = soil gas screening level
TCE = trichloroethene
TPH-g = total petroleum hydrocarbons, gasoline range
4 Methane was compared against a Lower Exlosive Limit of 5% as measured by a hand-held GemTech 5000 Flame Ionizaton Detector 2 Only detected VOCs shown in table; see lab reports for full list of analytes. Analyzed by EPA Methods 8260B/8260B-Modified (3/11/2022, 7/29/2016 (Modified), and 9/20/2022) or TO-15 (7/21/2016), unless otherwise noted.
3 Except as noted (see Footnote 4), Calculated soil gas screening levels (SGSLs) were derived by dividing the May 2022 Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) screening levels (shown in black) or November 2022 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Screening Levels (shown in blue) for VOCs, and 2019 SFBWQCB Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for TPH-g (shown in green) for indoor air by the noted attenuation factor.

Results in bold denote concentrations detected at or above the laboratory reporting limit. Results in bold and highlighted yellow denote concentrations exceeding applicable SGSLs for the current property use (industrial/commercial).

SVP-19
Calculated Industrial SGSL with 0.03 Attenuation Factor3 P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\Tables\1071-080_5355-EAirportDr_SSI_Tables_2023-01-27 3 of 3
3227
P:\1071 Prologis\1071080 2021 SoCal Due Diligence II\002 5355 E Airport Dr\Deliverables\2022 SI Rpt\2022.12.13_5355 E. Airport Dr_Add SI Report_Farallon.docx

APPENDIX A

BORING LOGS

ADDITIONAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT
5355 East Airport Drive
Ontario, California
Farallon PN: 1071-080 (Task 2)
3228
Client:

Project: 5355 Airport Drive
Prologis Inc
% Recovery
Farallon PN:

Logged By:

Reviewed By:

Nate Montoy
Kathy Lehnus
1071-080
Date/Time Completed: 9/16/22 Boring Diameter (in):

Location: Ontario, California
Sampler Type:

Drilling Operator:

Drilling Equipment:

Drilling Method:

Drilling Company:

Date/Time Started:

Acetate sleeve
Chris K
Hand Auger; Geoprobe 6600
Direct Push
ABC Liovin
9/16/22
Constructed Well Depth (ft bgs):

Total Boring Depth (ft bgs):

Depth to Water ATD (ft bgs): NE

11.0 NA
Log of Boring:

Page 1 of 1 ends

Ontario City CouncilNovember 19, 2024

Ontario City Council
November 19, 2024