Agenda packet — Ontario City Council, November 19, 2024 (part 8 of 31)

*Map Name: Guasti
Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV No. 1 Transmission Line
*Date of Map:

DPR 523K (1/95) *Required Information
1978
P-36-008857 UPDATE
CA-SBR-8857
*Scale: 1:24,000
¯
1248
GUASTI
Projection:

NAD 83 UTM Zone 11
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP
Primary # ___________________________________
HRI# ______________________________________
Trinomial ____________________________________

Page 15 ends

*Map Name: Guasti
Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV No. 1 Transmission Line
*Date of Map:

DPR 523K (1/95) *Required Information
1978
P-36-008857 UPDATE
CA-SBR-8857
*Scale: 1:24,000
¯
1249
Mira Loma
Substation
GUASTI

CORONA NORTH
Projection:

NAD 83 UTM Zone 11
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP
Primary # ___________________________________
HRI# ______________________________________
Trinomial ____________________________________

Page 16 of 16 ends

*Map Name: Guasti
Lugo-Mira Loma 500kV No. 1 Transmission Line
*Date of Map:

DPR 523K (1/95) *Required Information
1978
P-36-008857 UPDATE
CA-SBR-8857
*Scale: 1:24,000
¯
1250
1o
‘I,,,.—
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # P-36-008857 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 7 ends

P1. Other Identifier: SRI-1607
*Resource Name or #: SRI-i 607 (UPDATE)
*p2. Location: Not for Publication El Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino * b. USGS Quad: 7.5’ CAJON (2009); T 3N R 5W, SW1A of SW% of Sec. 19; SBBM c. Address:
d. UTM: Zone 11; 458625 mE/ 3798207 mN NAD27 GPS
e. Other Locational Data:

The site is crosses Highway 138 at postmiles 17.3 to 17.5, southwest of Hesperia. * P3a. Description:

This site consists of a historical power transmission line. The transmission line as it exists today consists of five, 500 kV transmission wires strung between steel pylons measuring about 80 feet high. Within the right-of-way, the length of the line recorded on the north and south sides of Highway 138 is 464 feet. The site was previously recorded as P-36-008857. In that site record, it was indicated that the transmission lines were originally constructed in 1915 but was replaced in the early 1960s. The current project only examines the first 15 meters from the edge of pavement corresponding to the Caltrans right-of-way. The site continues beyond the right-of-way, but these portions were not recorded. No cultural material is associated with this site. *p6. Date Constructed/Age & Sources:

Historic tiPrehistoric EBoth
*7 Owner and Address:

NGUYEN, THAI D, 13666

EASTBRIDGE STREET

WESTMINSTER, CA
*3 Recorded by:

Joshua TramPier)S/2_(
*9 Date Recorded: 5/16/2011
*p.• Survey Type:

Reconnaissance survey of highway
right-of-way
*Attachments: El None Location Map Sketch Map J Continuation Sheet El Building, Structure, and Object Record Archaeological Record El District Record Linear Feature Record El Milling Station Record El Rock Art Record El Artifact Record Photograph Record El Other:
*P3b Resource Attributes: HP 39 Other-electric power transmission line, AH16 Other-electric power transmission line LIE .:I.J. tructure [1 ElDistrict El Element of District ElOther (Isolates, etc.) *P5b Description of Photo:

Facing E; 4/5/2011; Transmission line
and tower
‘.,it tion: Report forthcoming
DPR523A (1/95) *Required Information
1251
State of Cahfornia - The Resources Agency Primary # P-36-008857 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Trinomial

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE RECORD

Page 2 of 7 ends

*Al. Dimensions: a. Length 223 m (NE/SW) x b. Width 39 m (NW/SE) Method of Measurement: El Paced E Taped E Visual estimate GPS U Other:

Method of Determination: U Artifacts Features U Soil U Vegetation U Topography U Cut bank U Animal burrow U Excavation UI Property boundary l Other: The site boundary is determined in part by the right-of-way established Reliability of determination: V High -Medium Low
Explain: The transmission line is clearly distinguishable from surrounding vegetation and topography.

Limitations: Restricted access U Paved/built over V Site limits incompletely defined U Disturbances Vegetation Other:

A2. Depth: None v None U Unknown Method ot determination: None “A3. Human Remains: Present Absent U Possible Unknown
*A4 Features:

The only feature associated with this site consists of a historical power transmission line (Feature 6286). As the lines are suspended roughly 70 feet off the ground, all observations and mapping are limited to what can be estimated from the ground.

The transmission line as it exists today consists of five, 500 kV transmission wires strung between steel pylons measuring about 80 feet high. Three transmission wires are suspended from insulating coils hung from the top of the pylon; these coils are about 5 feet high. Relative to the body of the pylon, these three coils are located on the two outer edges and the center of it. The other two transmission wires are attached to the top of the pylon. The thickness of the transmission wires is unknown, perhaps 1 inch thick. The five transmission wires are evenly spaced and span a distance of 86 feet. Within the right-of-way, the length of the line recorded on the north and south sides of Highway 138 is 464 feet.

The site was previously recorded as P-36-008857. In that site record, it was indicated that the transmission lines were originally constructed in 1915 but was replaced in the early 1960s.

The current project only examines the first 15 meters from the edge of pavement corresponding to the Caltrans right-of-way. The site continues beyond the right-of-way, but these portions were not recorded. No cultural material is associated with this feature.
*A5 Cultural Constituents:

No artifacts were located.
*A6. Were Specimens Collected? V No U Yes
*A7 Site Condition i Good U Fair U Poor
No disturbances noted.
*A8 Nearest Water: Crowder Creek is located 50 mto the south of the electrical pylon. *A9 Elevation: 1040 m amsi
Al 0. Environmental Setting:

Soil is a moderately sorted, loosely compacted, gravelly sand. Vegetation includes grasses and Coastal Sage Scrub community plants. The site is located on a slope that slopes downward at an angle of 5 degrees to the east.

All. Historical Information:

Previous site records indicate the original transmission lines were replaced in the 1960s. *A12. Age: U Prehistoric U Protohistoric U 1542-1769 U 1769-1848 U 1848-1880 U 1880-1914 U 1914-1945 V Post-1945 U Undetermined
A13. Interpretations:

None
Al 4. Remarks:

The site has not changed from previous site records.

A15. References:

None
A16. Photographs: See photograph record
Original Media/Negatives Kept At: 21 W. Stuart Aye, Redlands, CA 92373 *A17. Form Prepared By: Joshua Trampier Date: 5/16/2011 Affiliation and Address: Statistical Research, Inc., 21 W. Stuart Aye, Redlands, CA 92373 DPR523C (1/95) *Required Information
1252
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # P-36-008857 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial

Page 3 of 7 ends

Li. Historic andlor Common Name: None
L2a. Portion Described: Entire Resource Segment D Point Observation Designation: Feature 6286 L2b. Location of Point or Segment:

Zone ii; 458564 mEl 3798164 mN NAD27 GPS
Zone ii; 458701 mE/ 3798259 mN NAD27 GPS
L3. Description:

The transmission line as it exists today consists of five, 500 kV transmission wires strung between steel pylons measuring about 80 feet high. Three transmission wires are suspended from insulating coils hung from the top of the pylon; these coils are about 5 feet high. Relative to the body of the pylon, these three coils are located on the two outer edges and the center of it. The other two transmission wires are attached to the top of the pylon. The thickness of the transmission wires is L4. Dimensions: L4e. Sketch of Cross-Section: Facing: a. Top Width: 29.00 m b. Bottom Width: N/A
c. Height or Depth: None
d. Length of Segment: 145.00 m
L5. Associated Resources:

None
L6. Setting:

L7. Integrity Considerations:

No disturbances noted.

L8b. Description of Photo, Map, or
Drawing
See sketch map
L9. Remarks:

The site has not changed from
previous site records.

LI 0. Form Prepared By:

Joshua Trampler
Lii. Date: 5/16/2011
DPR523E (1195)
1253
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # P-36-008857 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PHOTOGRAPH RECORD Trinomial

Page 4 of 7 ends

Camera Format: Lens Size:

Film Type and Speed: Digital Negatives Kept At: 21 W. Stuart Aye, Redlands, CA 92373 Date Time Exp/ Subject/Description View Accession #
Frame Toward
4/5/2011 3141 Transmission line and tower E
5/13/2011 65 Transmission line W
DPR5231 (1195)
1254
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # P-36-008857 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
LOCATION MAP Trinomial

Page 5 of 7 ends

*Map Name: 7.5’ CAJON USGS Topographic Quad Scale: 1:24,000 *Year: 2009 CAJON .fr’
P’.1
\
-t1
DPR523J (1195) “Required Information
1255
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # P-36-008857 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
SKETCH MAP Trinomial
Page6of7 *Resource Name or#: SRI-1607 (UPDATE)
*Drawn By: Joshua Trampier *Date: 05/16/2011
Previously
recorded site:

P-36-000 114
P36-000114
— — —
,
; ‘
I ii
Previously
recorded site:

P36-004255
Previously
recorded site:

P-36-004272
Site datum
0 Postmile
— — — 0 ft 100 L.i Site boundary
0PR523K (1195) *Required Information
1256
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # P-36-008857 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial

Page 7 of 7 ends

*Recorded By: Joshua Trampier *Date: 5/16/2011 Continuation Li Update P2b. Legal description
T 3N R 6W; NE¼ of NE¼ of Sec 25; SBBM
T 3N R 6W; SE1h of SE% of Sec 24; SBBM
P2d. UTM
Zone 11: 458701 mE/ 3798259 mN NAD27 GPS
P4. Resources Present
[XJ Other (linear)
P7. Owner and Address
PARKER, WILLIAM FAM TR 5-3-91 -EST
P0 BOX 63700-TREO

SAN FRANCISCO CA

PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD
600 ATLANTIC AVE
BOSTON MA 02210
Al. Method of determination
by Caltrans. The right-of-way extends 15 m from the edge of the pavement. The site continues beyond the right-of-way, but these portions were not recorded.

L3. Description
unknown, perhaps 1 inch thick. The five transmission wires are evenly spaced and span a distance of 86 feet. Within the right-of way, the length of the line recorded on the north and south sides of Highway 138 is 464 feet.

The site was previously recorded as P-36-008857. In that site record, it was indicated that the transmission lines were originally constructed in 1915 but was replaced in the early i960s.

DPR523L (1195) *Required Information
1257
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEP ARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Page _1_ of L
'Recorded by: J. Coleman
Primary# __ re -()=-.;;........::::....:::....---I-7 _______ _ HRI#
Trinomial : CA-SBR-8857H
'Resource Name or # Lytle Canyon Transmission Lines
Date: 12/12/10 0 Continuation ~Update
During a survey for the Oak Hills Fuel Modification Project for the Natural Resources Conservation Service in cooperation with the United States Forest Service the transmission line was relocated and found to be in good condition. There are no changes to its status since its last update. The field crew concurs with the previous recorder's assessment that the resource does not meet National Register criteria, and therefore recommends CA-SBR-8857H as not eligible for listing in the NRHP.

Condition: Good
Crew: J. Coleman, G. Bergman-Hutson, R Kast, and A. Boltz.

Affiliation:

Solano Archaeological Services
131 Sunset Avenue, Ste. E 120
Suisun, CA 94585
Date: December 12, 2010
DPR 523L (1/95)
CA-SBR-8857H facing northeast.
'Required information
1258
State of California The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

LOCATION MAP

Page 20 ends

*Map Name: Cajon
Primary #
HRI#
Trinomial CA-SBR-8857H
Lytle Canyon Transmission Line
*Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of Map: 1996
Oak: Hills Fuel Modification Project Findings Map
o -0-1,000 Feet
I I
o 500 Meters
I
C Oak: Hills APE .A. Cultural Resource c.:::. Linear Site 1:20,000
USGS. Cajon Quadrangle, California
[map]. 1 :24,000. 7.5' Series. USGS, 1996. Solano Archaeological Services DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information
1259
Page _1_ of _3_ *Resource Name or #~ (Assigned by recorder) P1. Other Identifier: previously listed as part of PSBR-37H *P2. Location: l1li Not for Publication 0 Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a location Map as necessary.) +b. USGS 7.5' Quad see below Date ' T _; R __ ; _ ~ of _ ~ of Sec _; SBd B.M. d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear' resources) Zone 11, see below mEl mN e. Other locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Power line shown on 1942 Corps of Engineers 15' Hesperia quadrangle (see segment of line on Location Map). Its route on Hesperia quad corresponds to Sections 1, 12, 13 and 24 of T2N, R6W; Sections 24, 25 and 36 of T3N, R6W; and Sections 9-11, 16, 17, 19, and 20 of T3N, R5W of the present-day USGS 7.5' Cajon quad. The line continues NE onto the 1942 15' Deep Creek quad and Sand SW onto 1942 15' San Bernardino and Cucamonga quads providing electric power for the Los Angeles Basin from the southern Sierras.

UTMs (segment on 7.5' 1956 [1988] Cajon quad: south end: 457680 mEl 3789790; north end: 465500 mEl 3802520.

Elevation (segment on Cajon quad): 2,560 feet (south end); 3,780 feet (north end). *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries)
Southern Sierras Power Co. branch power line built ca. 1915. Mistakenly recorded by Brock (1986) as part of Lytle Canyon Transmission Lines. Line and towers were completely removed and replaced by the Mira Lorna I line in the early 1960s following a slightly different route (Myers 1983:222-226). Resource destroyed. *P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP39 - Electric Power Transmission Line *P4. Resources Present: 0 Building 0 Structure 0 Object 0 Site 0 District 0 Element of District 0 Other (Isolates, etc.) ~ ________________________________ ~P5b Description of Photo' (~ew date P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects.) accession #) *PS. Date Constructed/Age and
Source: Il.lI Historic
o Prehistoric 0 Both
ca. 1915 to early 1960s
*P7. Owner and Address:
once crossed lands owned by
multiple private landowners
and government agencies
*PS. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and
address) Phi 1 ip de Barros
and Joel Paulson,
Professional Archaeological
Services, 13730 Via Cima
Bella, San Diego, CA 92129
*P9. Date Recorded: 6 (8/97
*P10. Survey Type: (Describe)
Reconnaissance survey
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey
report and other sources, or enter "none.")
Addendum Archaeological
Survey Report, Route 138
Imorovement Proj ect , 08 - L-___________________________________________ ~SBd-138, PM 16.5/19.7.

ProfesslonalArchaeologlcal
Services, San Diego, by Philip de Barros, 1997. Submitted to Rancho Las Flores Ltd.

Partnership, Dana Point. See also W.A. Myers (1983). Iron Men and Copper Wires: A Centennial History of the Southern California Edison Company. Trans-Anglo Books, Glendale. *Attachments: ONONE Il.lIlocation Map OSketch Map OContinuation Sheet OBuilding, Structure, and Object Record OArchaeological Record ODistrict Record OLinear Feature Record OMiliing Station Record ORock Art Record OArtifact Reco rd OPhotograph Record 0 Other (List):

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
1260
Page _2_ of _3__ +Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) ______________ _ +Map Name: Corps of Engineers 15' Hesperia +ScaJe: 1: 62« 500 *Date of map: 1942 DPR 523J (1/95)
EDriii:[E:::i0~====~IOOOi:1 ====:ioooE====~30003:3 ====4000E====~53000 Yards CONTOUR INTERVAL 50 FEET

DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
1365 (SAN BERNARDINI
+Required information 1261
State of California - . The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
lOCATION···M:AP
Primary # _ 'P!......:!io ' ... 3 o!J..j (''"f):L.:-:....L. r1.LJi (o.J;. .)....L...; <6'I/..:: /).,L 7 ______ ~ HRI# ______________ ~ ____________________ I Trinomial _---'S:..:B:..:R;:..-.....:8:;..8:..;5:;..7.....:H:.:-___________ 1 Page _3_ of __ 3 __
+MapName:Corps of Engineers
+Resource Name or # (Assigned by recordert. ______________ _ 1000 500 o RHHHH
DPR 523J ('/95)
15' Hesperia ·Scale: 1:62,500 *Date of map:
1000 2000 3000
CONTOUR INTERVAL 50 FEET

DATUM IS MEAN SEA LEVEL
4000 5000 Yar ds
1942
+ Required information 1262
,.
-PSER .. 32- tI
J);'De I(' ~/JG(' CA · ~l)-~i5~~~7 - S, RCHITEt;TURAL .VENTORY IEVALUATION FORM LC-20 LYTLE CAJ.~'YON TRANSrlISSIOt\ U );ES ___ LISTED ___ DETERMI~D ELIGIBLE
___ API'EARS ELIGIBLE ___ APPEARS n:ELIGIDLE
IDENTIFICATION LYTLE CAI~YON TRAJ.'lJSNISSION LINES

1. Ccmmonn~me: ________ -----------------------------------------------------------

2. Histori~ n"me: ___________________________________________________ Same _

3. Strut or rur,1 ,ddress: ______________________________________________________ _ Citvt. ______________________________ Zip ______ CCunW ___ ;;;.Sa::;.n:.:-Be;;;.;;;.rn:;.;,;;a;;,:r:.;d;,;i:,:.n.:.;:o:....... ___ _ .t. P,,~eJ number: _________________________________________________________ _

5. Present Owner: _..;lAD;..;;;.;,;~JP:.;..:../.:;.:;C.:;E~ ___________________ . Address: P.O. Box 600 City Rosemead, CA Zip 91771 Ownership is: Public ____ Privlte ___ X ___ _

6. Present Use: Hydroelectric transmission Origin.1 use: _~:.;am;;.:~e~ ____________________ _

DESCRIPTION
7a. ArchitKtural stvle:
lb. Briefly desc:ri!le the present phy:ic6/ description of the site or structure .nd oesc:ri!ll any major alterations from its origin.1 condition:

This site consists of three sets of electrical transmission lines mounted on metal towers; tvlO of these lines are owned and maintained by Los Angeles Department of \·Jater and Power and one line forms a part of the connector system of Lytle Creek Powerhouse No.1 (LC-16a), owned by the Southern California Edison Company.
/)5& S ]) t/o..?;
CAJ o0
U. ..uCO ~
AU.'Ich Photoh) Here O.

9. 10.

Construction d:lte :

E$lim.:ated 1 91 2 J
1936
Architect
Duilder
F .. ~tu,,1

11. Af'proll. propertY size (in feet)
Front.l9C_ D"pth
or .lp~roll. Icru91

12. D~f" (s) of enclo\t:d photo9r:';lh (,)
Jan. 1983 1263
lJ. Condition: Ellcellent X Good _ Fair _ OClerior:Ucd _ No lon!ler in existcnc:~ _ ,

14. Alterations:

Unknown
'.

15. Surr~undinq,: ICheck more ttl.)n ont' if ntcenaryl Open land ~ SC:.1ttered buildings _ O,nsely built·up _ Ruidenti.11 _ Induuri.11 _ Commercial _ Other:

Hi. Threats to sit': Non~known_Privatl d,velopment_ Zoning _ Vandalism --:.- Public Works projrct -:- Otn,,: __________________________ _

17. I, the ltrUCtUfl: On its ori9i~1 site? _~X __ _ Mov'd7 ___ _ Unknown? ___ _

18. Relattd futurtS: Lytle Creek PO\'lerhoyse No. o C-16a)

SIGNIFICANCE

19. Briefly state hiSloriul andlor architectural importance (include dates. evenu. and persons associated with the site.) LC-20a
Land was acquired for a right-of-way (450 ft.) for these transmission lines in 1923 (8U1 Sacramento) . The completion of the lines ca. 1936 marked the entry of Boulder Dam hydroelectric power to the Los Angeles Basin.

LC-20b -
'Land \.Jas granted for right-of-way to extend Edison Cori1pany poVler lines from Lytle Creek Powerhouse No. 1 (LC-16) up the canyon to Miller . .

Nar-FBWS--artd--5eothmd ill 19±-2 (8U1 .Sacramento) '-W ROIJ (o D~ ..j G c ~." .' '- '.;:. ~ G ,) _, ( -' r C : 'J ).J 6 )-.) !.I_ j · ::- i.! ..J ::...::..C- o~ ! /, c.: , . .J ,', i . _, ~- f 0 / ,:' u.... (' (:. ,l ' 'J~ I,' i oj..' •

20. Main thtlne of the hiuoric re~ourcc:: (If mora than one is ched:cd, number in order of imporunce.'
Ard\ill:ame Arts & Leisure ______ _
Economic/lndu'tri~1 ..1LElCplor~tionlSettlement ___ _ Governm.nt Milit.1ry ________ _ Religion Soci.1I/Educ~tion _____ _

21. Sources (Li:t book,. documents. suntCVI. personal interviews and lheir d.)te,l.

Iyers 1985
Forer,,an 1985
BU1 Sacr amen t.D
January 8, 1986 Date form rwep:ucd __ ~~~""""!"I""""'~~ ___ _ Dv (Nmcl John 1:-'. t.l1lOtt ';';;'';''';; __ _ Ems Orl}anil.1tion~~--...;;.;;.;;.;~-------- Address: 5300 Orange Aye.,
Cit., 714/827-1180
Suj te 220
Zi" ___ _ Phone: ______________________ __
1264
P1. Other Identifier: Southern Pacific Railroad; SP; SPRR; West Line Basin Alignment; Alternate Sunset Route, Union Pacific Railroad; UPRR M.P. 517.37.
*P2 Location: D Not for Publication 0 Unrestricted
and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5 Quad: Ontario, Calif. Date: 1981 T iS ; R 8W ; % of c. Address: N/A City: Montclaird. UTM: Segment 11 S 435394.35mE, 3769049.OOmN to 11 S 435654.88mE, 3769057.9OmNe. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, direcons to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) 8evation:
*p6. Date ConstructedlAge andSources: XHistoric
EJPrehistoric DBoth
c.1883-2010
*7 Owner and Address:

Union Pacific Railroad1400 Douglas St.Omaha, NE68179
*pB. Recorded by:and address)
Daniel D. Paul,Architectural HistorianICF International 811 West 7th Street, Suite 800Los Angeles, CA 90017
4dd
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # P36-010330 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial CA-SBR-10,330H L pct
NRHP Status Code 6Y
Other ListingsReview Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 ends

*a. County: San Bernardino
1/4of Sec 26 ;MDB.M.

Zip: 91762
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its rmjor elerrnts. Include design, rraterials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The Southern Pacific Railroad at Monte Vista Avenue is a parallel set of standard gauge railroad tracks, running east-west and bisecting Monte Vista Avenue in Montclair, CA. The northern-most set of tracks within this segment feature rails, pandrol clips and concrete ties that appear to date from c.2003. The southern set of tracks has wood ties with a slightly different version ofpandrol clip. The estimated replacement span of ties for active track is approximately 30 years, and this segment is believed tobe less than 50 years old. The two alignments are set upon a slightly elevated ballast-covered berm. The alignment features a set of recent crossbars located at either side of Monte Vista Avenue. Concrete plates at either side of the rail are present where it traverses the paved Monte Vista Avenue. Just south of the alignments due east of Monte Vista Avenue is a wide, paved driveway that leads to the “Montclair Yard,” which itself is outside of the project area. A metal call box, which appears to be less than 50 years old, is present just west of Monte Vista Avenue and south of the alignments. A standard crossing bar and signal is present at either end of Monte Vista Avenue, and they too appear to be recent. *p3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) AH7. Roads/trails/railroad grades *4 Resources Present: DBuilding DStructure XObject LJSite LiDistrict LiElement of District OOther (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View,
date, accession #) Southern PacificRailroad at Monte Vista Avenue.

View: SW. Photo: Daniel Paul, ICF
International. November, 18, 2012.

P5a. Photo or Drawing (Rioto required for buildings, structures, and objects.) (Narr, affiliation,
*9 Date Recorded: November 26, 2012*p. 0. Survey Type: Intensive Level, Section 106 Compliance *P11. Report Citation: Monte Vista Grade Separation Project, Caltrans District 8, Historic Resources and Evaluation Report, November 2012.
*Attachments: DNONE OLocation Map OSketch Map XContinuation Sheet XBuilding, Structure, and Object Record DArchaeological Record DDistrict Record DLinear Feature Record DMilling Station Record DRock Art RecordDArtifact Record 0 Photograph Record 0 Other (List):

DPR 523A (1195) *Required inform ation
1265
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 ends

*Resource Name or # Southern Pacific Railroad at rvbnte Vista Avenue BI. Historic Name: Southern Pacific Railroad; SF; SPRR; West Line Basin Alignment; Alternate Sunset Route, Union Pacific Railroad; UPRR M.P. 517.37.

B2. Common Name: Union Pacific Railroad
B3. Original Use: transportation: railroad B4. Present Use: transportation: railroad L *B5. Architectural Style: N/A
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) originaly constructed in 1883; all rail relatedmaterial appears to date from within the last 30-50 years. *B7. Moved? XNo E:lYes Unknown Date: Original Location:*B8. Related Features: Signal box, mile post, call box, storage yard access, cross bars, light signals, creek underpass.

B9a. Architect: N/A b. Builder: Southern Pacific Railroad *Blo. Significance: Theme: Transportation Area: Southern California Period of Significance: 1883-c.1930 Property Type: Object: railroad alignment Applicable Criteria: N/A L (Discuss importance in terrrs of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)
In 1999, the entirety of the Union Pacific Railroad (UP/ UPRR) was found eligible across Southern California. The DPR that argued this determination was never submitted to the State Office of Historic Preservation, and there is no record in the State Historic Resources Inventory that formalized this finding. Within the proposed project area, the entirety of both SP lines is wholly reconstructed with new materials. The Southern Pacific Railroad, as a railroad that opened up the southwest, isincredibly historically significant. However this segment retains only its integrity of location and association. Historically the setting was primarily citrus agriculture by the time the railroad arrived in 1883. This setting has been replaced by light E industrial use, suburban development, and the wholesale loss of citrus within the project area. The feeling of a railroad penetrating the open West has likewise been lost with the advent of local cityhood and post-war development within the vicinity. The design of the alignment and its components are similar. However, in detail many of these components are new, r particularly the use of concrete ties and pandrol clips. With these changes have come a loss of integrity of materials and workmanship. The Southern Pacific Railroad where it crosses Monte Vista Avenue in Montclair, CA, does not appear to retain eligibility under National register of Historic Places Criteria A, B, or C, or California Register of Historical Resources Criteria 1,2, or 3. This resource was not analyzed at the municipal level as part of this evaluation.

BI 1. Additional Resource Attributes: moved to 523A form References:

U Orsi, Raymond J. 2005. Sunset Limited: The Southern Pacific Railroad and the Development of the American West, 1850-1930. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press; Conley, Bernice U Bedford. The Beginnings of Montclair’s Development. The Daily Report. January 11, 1981.

Trains.com online community
B13. Remarks:
*B14 Evaluator: Daniel D. Paul, Architectural Historian,ICF International *Date of Evaluation: November 27, 2012
(This space reserved for official comments.)
DPR 523B (1195) *Required information
1266
State of California— The Resources Agency Primary# P36-010330 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial CA-SBR-10,330HPage 3 of3 *Resource Name or # Southern Pacific Railroad at Monte Vista Avenue *Recorded by: Daniel Paul, ICF International *Date: November 16, 2012 LJContinuation • Update \
Southern Pacific 1
signal box. View: W. November, 2012.

Southern Pacific Railroad at Monte ‘... a Avenue. From F...,..

Vista Avenue looking south. November, 2012.
a
Southern P Railroad at Monte .,,.a Avenue:

Access road to Montclair Yard. SPRR alignments
are at the left, SP,LA&SL alignment is at the right.

View: E. November, 2012.

DPR 523L (1195) *Required information
1267
• ( , .• ' f
State of California - The Resources Agenc y

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Primary# -J?a6 9'18330
HRl# :3 :' ~) ..... " . :.. ~? 0: ' ,-
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial CA SBR 19~ H
NRHP Status Code 6Y
J ~ , .... ,... , -__ .

Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Dale

Page 1 ends

Pi . Other Identifier: San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt lake Ra ilroad; Los Ange les and Salt La ke Rai lroad; Unio n Pacific Railroad; sP,LA&SL, LA&sL, sLR; UPRR MP 517.37.
·P2. Location: 0 Not for Publication 0 Unrestricted "a. County: San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a l ocaton Map as necessary.) :;,:. "b. USGS 7.S' Quad: Ontario, Ca lir. "'f <0. 1': ' , Date: 1981 T1s; R8W; '14 of 'I .. of Sec 26 ; M:Q:.8.M. c. Address: N/ A City: Montclair Zip: 91762
d. UTM: 115 4356%.87m E, 3769019.65mN to 115 435654.68mE, 3769019.23mN e. Other Locational Data : (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Bevation: Approximately 800 foot lo ng segment of a lignment bisected by Monte Vista Avenue in Montclair, CA. *P3a. Des cription: (Describe resource and Hs n-epr elerrents. hclude design, rmterjals. condition. aHerations. size, setting, and boundaries) The San Pedro, Los Angeles a nd Salt Lake Rai lroad at Monte Vista Avenue is a standard guage rai lroad, runni ng east to west, with concrete tics, pandrol cl ips, and rail itself that appear to be less than 50 years old. The alignment is e levated upon a low berm that is covered with ballast. To the east of Monte Vista Avenue, just south of the alignment is a wood post with the marker "35.~ A wide, paved scrvke road that leads to the UPRR "Montclair Yard" is present just north of the alignment. West of the Avenue and sout h of the alignment is a meta l, shed-li ke ca ll-in box that appears to be less than 50 years old. t\ pair ofrecent crossing bars are present just so uth of the alignment at ei ther end of Monte Vista Avenue. *P3b, Resource AHributes: Ni 7. Roadsllrails/railroad grades ·P4. Resources Present: O Building O Strueture XObject a Sile DDistriet OElement of District O Olher (Isolates, etc,) p=5a---::p OC'O-O-' aw--:-;n-g-I "' O-,,-q-" i' """"::f-Ot-b-"-i.-'-;ng ,-S-,,-"-, ," ,, ,-a-n-d-o .-)------. P5b. Desc ription of Plloto: (View , date, accession #) San Pedro Los
Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad at
Montc Vista Avenue. View: E.

Photo: Daniel Paul, ICF
International. November, 18, 2012.

ICF International
811 West ]lh Street, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
*P9. Date Recorded: November 26, 2012
·P10. Survey Type : Inte nsive Level Survey, Section 106 Compliance *P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: XHistoric
O Preh istorie OBoth
1905-2010.
·P7. Owner and Address:

Union Pacific Rai lroad
1400 Douglas St.

Omaha, NE
68179
*P8. Recorded by: (Narre, affiljation,
and address)
Daniel D. Paul,
Architectura l Historian
*Pi1 . Report Citation: Monte Vista Grade Separa tion Project, Ca ltrans District 8, Historic Resources and Evalua tion Repo rt, November 20'12.
·Atta chments: ONONE Oloca tion fv1ap DSketeh Map XContin ua tion Sheet XBuilding, Structure, and Object Record OArchaeological Record O District Record O Unear Feature Record OMUi ng Station Record ORock M Record Olvtifact Record OPhotograph Record 0 Other (l ist):

CPR 523A (1I9S) "Required information 1268
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Primary #-P36:{1109S0
HRI# 3(b- J,.' .- ' ''':1::;

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 ends

*Resource Name or # San Pedro, Los Angeles and SaH Lake Railroad at Mmte Vista Avenue B1 . Historic Name: San Pedro Los Angeles and Sa lt La ke Railroad; Los Angeles and Salt Lake Ra ilroad; Union Pacific Railroad; SP,LA&SL. LA&SL, SLR.

82. Common Name : Union Pacific Rai lroad
B3. Original Use: transpo rtation: railroad 84. Present Use : transporta tion: ra ilroad *B5. Architectural Style : Nj A
*86. Construction History: (Construction date. a~erat ions, and date of aHerations) originaly constructed in 'I'X}S; all rai l alignment ma terials appear to be recent.
*B7. Moved? XNo oVes OUnknown Date: Original Location:
*88. Related Features: wood post with ma rker; underpass, signa l lights, Signal box, crossing bars 89a. Architect: N/ A b. Builder: The San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad *B10. Significance: Theme: Transportatio n Area : Southern California Period of Significance: 1905-c.193O Property Type: Object: railroad al ig nment Applicable Criteria : N/ A (Discuss irrportance in term; of historical or archKectural context as defined by thema, period, and geographic scope. Also address inlegr~y.)
In 1999, the entirety of the Union Pa cific Ra ilroad wa s found e ligible across Southern California. The DPR making this de termination \\'a s never submitted to the Slate Office of Histo ric Pres ervation, and the re is no record in the State Historic Resource s Inve ntory that forma lized this finding. ·rne SI',LA&SL ' .... as founded by fo rmer Montana Senator William Andrews Clark.. and integrated with pre-cxisting Utah railroa ds that date back to approximately 1871. Intended to connect the bourgeoning Sa n Pe dro I·tabor (later Port of Los Angeles) with points \o\"Cst, the SP, LA.&SL wa s o ne of three ma jor Southern California railroads responsible for greatly connecting Southern California to the re st of the United States befo re the automobile age. Within the project area, the SP,LA.&SL was constructed in 1905 and unlike the para llel SP line s due immedia te ly no rth, the SP,LA&SL provided pa ssenger se rvice to the vicinity . The s ubject SP, LA&SL segment within the project a rca a ppe a rs to be com pie tely reconstructed \\lith rece nt ra ils, tics, pa ndro l cl ips, and ba Ha st. Historica lly the se tting wa s primarily citrus agriculture and had a small vicinity ca lled Fremont loca ted about a quarter mile north of the a lignment.

This se tting ha s been replaced by light industrial usc , s uburban development, and the complete loss of citrus agriculture within the project area. The integrity of feeling: o f a ra ilroad ope ning up the West, servicing the agriculturill industry a n d a nearby small town is also comple tely lost. The de sign of the alignment a nd its fea tures is highly similar to the historic period, both in the gauge and the fundame nta l components of the alignment. But in detail many of these components arc new, particula rly the usc of concrete ties and pandrol clips. With these changes has come a loss of integrity of materia ls and \ .. /orkmanship. The SP,LA&SL at Monte Vista Ave nue in Montclair, CA, doe s not appear to retain eligibility under National Register of Historic Place s C rite ria A, B, or C, or California Register of Historica l Re sources Crite ria 1, 2, or 3. This re source wa s not analyzed at the municipal level as part of this evaluation. 811. Additiona l Resource Attributes:
*B12. References:

Conley, Bernice Bedford:

TIll! Begi""ings ojMollldflir's Dcuelopmell t. ·rne Da ily Report. Ja n. 11, 1981; MOllte Vista 5igll comes dowtt ami NaToti sign is pIlI back lip.

The Da ily Report, Feb. 1S, 1981: 17; Citrus Deve/oped Rapidlyal Nliroti.lh e Daily Report. Jan. 18, 198"1;
City of Montclair, Imliges of AmericlI: Montclair. Charleston, SC: Arcad ia Publishing, 2005: 88.

B13. Remarks:
·B14. Evaluator: Daniel D. Paul, Architectural Histo ria n, ICF ·Oate of Evaluation: November 27, 2012
(This s pace reseT\led fo r official comments.)
DPR 523B (1195)
(Sketch M3p with north arrow required.)
"Required information 1269
State of California - The Resources Agency

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary# ffi6:010330 ,:::G 0.)'-' , :... 7
HRI#
Trinomial CA-SBK-IO, 330 H

Page 3 ends

*Recorded
*Resource Name or # Southern Pacific Railroad at M:mte Vista Avenue ICF international *Date: 2012 OConti nuation •
San Pedro, los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad at Monte Vista Avenue. Alignment looking west from Monte Vista Avenue with call In booth. November, 2012.

Pedro, los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad at
I :~~:~v:::;~sta Avenue. Setting looking north toward ,. from Monte Vista Avenue. November, 2012.

San Pedro, los Angeles and Salt lake Railroad at Monte Vista Avenue. Alignment in foreground, SPRRaiignment in
background. View: NE. November, 2012.
'Required information 1270
Io(”7377
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary
# 36-010330 (Update) DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
_______________________
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial CA-SBR-10330H
NRHP Status Code 6Z
OtherListings
Review Code Reviewer
___________
Page ......L. of_ Resource Name or #: Southern Pacific Railroad segment P1. Othar Identifier: Union Pacific Railroad: APE Ma Reference #1 *P2 Location:

C Not for Publication 1 Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b USGS 7.5’ Quad: San Bernardino South, CA Date: 1967 PR 1980 T1S; R4W; S.B.B.M. c. Address: City: Colton, CA Zip: d. UTM: Zone: 11;
(G.P.S.)
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate):This approximately 1.85-mile log_ segment is located south of Interstate 10 (1-10) generally between North Cypress Avenue (north of I-b) and Mt. Vernon Avenue. *P3a Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This segment of the railroad consists of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR; formerly Southern Pacific Railroad [SPRRJ) mainline tracks, as well as various spurs, sidings, and wyes. Sets of railroad ties support pairs of rails and a layer of volcanic rocks lines the rail bed. 1-10 is adjacent to the north. At 9th Street, on the north side of the tracks, there are two altered historic-period buildings: a former Southern Pacific depot and a former American Railway Express Company building. To the south of the tracks are wooden utility poles, Slover Mountain, and the historic-period South Colton neighborhood. Crossing the UPRR approximately where South 6° Street would have been are two north-south Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF, formerly California Southern and Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe [ATSFJ) tracks. This extant, but modernized crossing is known as the Colton Crossing and is one of numerous rail-to-rail crossings in California.

The tracks appear to retain integrity of location, design, and association, but integrity of setting, materials, workmanship, and feeling have been compromised by the addition and realignment of tracks, routine maintenance and modifications constructon of -10, and alterations to the surrounding buildings and streets. *P3b Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP39 Other (railroad) 4 Resources Present: DBuilding LiStructure DObject DSite E:IDistrict C Element of District flOther (Isolates, etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) P5b Description of Photo (View date, accession #) Union Pacific tracks, view east from South
Rancho Avenue overpass on April 23, 2010. (Also see Linear Feature Record, page 3)
*p6. Date ConstructedlAge and
Sources: l1Historic
C Prehistoric
CBoth
1875
*7 Owner and Address:

Union Pacific Railroad
1400 Douglas Street
Omaha, NE 68179
*p8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, and address)
Casey Tibbet, M.A.

LSA Associates, Inc.
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92507
*9 Date Recorded:

May 2010
*pQ Survey Type: (Describe)
Intensive-level Section 106 and
CEQA compliance
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter “none.”) Historic Property Survey Report for the Colton Crossing Rail-to-Rail Grade Separation, Attachment B, Historic Resources Evaluation Report, 2011. *Aftachments: UNONE CLocation Map CSketch Map 1Continuation Sheet L1Building, Structure, arid Object Record DArchaeological Record UDistrict Record IXiLinear Feature Record OMilling Station Record CRock Art Record CArtifact Record C Photograph Record
C Other (List):

DPR 523A (1195)
R:\HDROBQ2_Colton CrossingCultural\DPR forms\Built resources for HRER\01 UP tracks.doc *Required information 1271
[iie of California—The Resources Agency Primary if 36-010330 (Update) DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 of 5 ends

81. Historic Name: Southern Pacific Railroad
B2. Common Name: Union Pacific Railroad

83. Original Use: Railroad B4. Present Use: Railroad *85 Architectural Style: NA *86 Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) 1875 railroad segment constructed *87. Moved? INo CYes DUnknown Date:

Original Location:
____________________________
*B8, Related Features:

B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Unknown *810. Significance: Theme: Transportation Area: City of Colton Period of Significance: 1875—1 960 Property Type: Railroad Applicable Criteria: NA (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) This approximately 1.85-mile long railroad segment does not appear to meet any of the criteria for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). The SPRR (now UPRR) was constructed in Colton in 1875. Since then, the setting has been extensively altered: buildings were removed in conjunction With construction of 1-10 adjacent to the north; grade separations (South Rancho Avenue, La Cadena Drive, and Mt. Vernon Avenue) have been constructed; tracks have been added, realigned, and otherwise modified; the tower at the crossing has been removed; and most of the nearby historic-period buildings which were constructed after the railroad was in place, have been removed or significantly altered.

Historical Background. The Southern Pacific Railroad was founded in 1865 by a group of businessmen led by Timothy Phelps (American Public University nd.). In May 1869, the first transcontinental railroad was completed when the Central Pacific joined the Union Pacific at Promontory, Utah. The Central Pacific was financed by ColIls P. Huntington, Charles (See Continuation Sheet) BI 1. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12 References:

Aerial Photographs
1938, 1959, 1968 Provided by GeoSearch from the ASCS collection.

American Public University
nd. Railroads, the Gilded Age. Accessed online in June 2010 at: http:l/www.u-s-history.com/pageslhl8l7.html. American-rails.com 2007—2010 The Espee, The Friendly Southern Pacific. Accessed online in June 2010 at: http:llwww.american-rails.comfsouthern pacific.html.

Cataldo, Nicholas
2006 The Earp Clan: the Southern California Years. Black Roads Press, San Bernardino. Ingersoll, L.A. 1904 Ingersoll’s Century Annals of San Bernardino County, 1769 to 1904. Volume One and Two.

Angeles, California.
(See Continuation Sheet)
__
813. Remarks:
*814. Evaluator: Casey Tibbet, M.A., LSA Associates, Inc., 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200. Riverside, CA 92507
*Date of Evaluation: May 2010
(This space reserved for official comments.)
Published by the author, Los
DPR 523B (1195) R:\HDRO8O2..Colton CrossingCultural\DPR forms\Built resources for HRERO1 u tracksdoc 1272
State of California—The Resources Agency Primary # 36-010330 (Update) DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # _______________________
LINEAR FEATURE RECORD Trinomial CA-SBR-10330H
NRHP Status Code GZ
OtherListings
Review Code Reviewer
_____________
Page ...._.of.&.. Resource Name or #: Southern Pacific Railroad segment LI. Historic and/or Common Name: Union Pacific Railroad L2a. Portion Described: D Entire Resource ISJ Segment 0 Point Observation Designation:____________________ b. Location of point or segment: (Provide UTM coordinates, legal description, and any other useful locational data. Show the area that has been field inspected on a Location Map) This segment runs through the City of Cohen and is approximately 1.85 miles long. It extends generally from South Rancho Avenue on the west to South Mt. Vernon Avenue on the east.

L3. Description: (Describe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segmentlpoint. Provide plans/sections as appropriate.) The segment consists of two sets of railroad ties that each support a pair of rails. A layer of volcanic rocks lines the rail bed. In some areas there are multiple tracks. (Refer to description in Primary Record, page 1) L4. Dimensions: (In feet for historic features and L4e. Sketch of Cross-Section (include scale) Facinq: meters for prehistoric features) a. Top Width 4’ 8.5”
b. Bottom Width 12’—15’
c. Height or Depth Aprox. 2’
d. Length of Segment Approx. 1.85 miles
L5. Associated Resources: Various sidings,
wyes, and spurs, as well as the former SP depot
(extensively altered and currently vacant), the
former American Railway Express Company
building (altered and vacant), a large metal
warehouse, and various sheds and trailers.

L6. Setting: (Describe natural features, landscape characteristics, slope, etc., as appropriate.) The setting includes 1-10 to the north, a historic-period neighborhood (most buildings extensively altered) to the south, and between 9h Street and Mount Vernon Avenue is the Colton Rail Yard. (Refer to discussions in Primary Record and BSO Record, pages 1, 2, and 4).

L7. Integrity Considerations:

Although this segment retains integrity of location and design, its integrity of setting and feeling have been significantly compromised. (Refer to discussion in BSO Record, pages 2 and 4) L8b. Description of Photo, Map,
or Drawing: (View, scale, etc.)
Colton Crossing (SPRR tracks in
foreground), view to the eastnortheast on May 14, 2010. (Also see Primary Record, page 1)L9. Remarks:

Lb. Form Prepared by: (Name, affiliation, and address)
Casey Tibbet, M.A.

LSA Associates, Inc.
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200
Riverside, CA 92507LII. Date: May2010
Cf
- - •:._ _-
:‘:.:.

L8a. Photograph, Map, or Drawing
rrc j-i,
R:\HDRO8O2_Cohton Crossing\Cultural\DPR forms\Built resources for HRER’iOl UP tracks.doc *Required information 1273
State of California
— The Resources Agency
Primary
# 36-010330 (Update) DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION CONTINUATION SHEET I-IRI#______________
Trinomial CA-SBR-10330H

Page 4 of 5 ends

*Recorded by LSA Associates, Inc. *Date: May 2010
X Continuation
Update
*B113 Significance (Continued from page 2)
Crocker, Mark Hopkins, and Leland Stanford, the so-called Big Four. In 1868, the Big Four purchased the Southern Pacific and merged it with the Central Pacific in 1870 (American Public University nd.). SPRR tracks soon sprawled across Southern California and between 1874 and 1881, tracks were built all across the country (ibid.). From its inception, the SPRR encouraged development of small family farms along its routes (Orsi 2005:106). In the 1860s through the mid-1870s, the SPRR published simple flyers advertising their lands (ibid.). These promotional endeavors increased in the late 1870s and into the 1880s with the publication of detailed brochures that often included maps and were the precursors to the elaborate advertising for which the railroad would become famous (ibid.). These concentrated marketing efforts greatly enhanced the role the SP played in the settlement and development of numerous communities along its routes, including Colton. In some places, such as Modesto, Turlock, Tulare, Delano, and Colton, the SPRR took things a step further and became involved in the development of hotels, hospitals, churches, schools, and parks and aggressively promoted settlement (ibid.:109 and Ill).

In 1875, the subject railroad segment was completed through Colton, helping the fledgling community get off the ground. In the 1880s, the SPRR served the Southwest, including El Paso, Texas, and extended into northern Oregon (American-rails.corn 2007— 2010). During this period, at least in the Riverside-San Bernardino area, SPRR had a virtual monopoly and charged exorbitant rates for freight. This made construction of the California Southern from San Diego, through Colton, to San Bernardino in 1883, an attractive alterative to local residents. The California Southern (later the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe [ATSF] and now the Burlington Northern Santa Fe [BNSF]) crosses the SPRR at Colton Crossing, where there was a standoff led by the SPRR and Virgil Earp, prohibiting construction of the crossing. Standoffs, such as the one at Colton Crossing, were a fairly common occurrence in California and the country in the late
l9 century. There are several instances in United States history where a private railroad attempted to cross the tracks of another, resulting in lawsuits or even violence. These standoffs are known as ‘frog wars,” named after the component of a railway switch that allows two tracks to join or cross.

A particularly famous frog war happened in Hopewell, New Jersey, in 1876 between the Pennsylvania Railroad and the Delaware and Bound Brook Railroad. In that instance, trains blocked the tracks and an armed fight broke out that included more than 100 people and required military involvement. Other examples of well-known frog wars jnclude the Greater Grand Crossing feud in Chicago in 1853; Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad vs. Atchison, Topeka & Santa ire Railroad vs. Union Pacific Railroad all vying for mountain passes in Colorado in the 1870s; and the Pennsylvania Railroad vs. the New Jersey Junction Connecting Railway (Lehigh Valley Railroad) in New Jersey in 1897. Ultimately, the California Southern crossed the SPRR in Colton, increasing competition and improving Coltons situation as a shipping center (Jones 1951). In 1886, the first refrigerated cars were introduced contributing to the economic boom of the Southern California citrus industry and in 1906, SPRR and UPRR formed the Pacific Fruit Express, dedicated to transporting goods that needed refrigeration (American Public University n.d.). The SPRR continued to grow throughout the early part of the 20th century and by the 1950s, it owned 15,000 miles of track, predominantly in the Southwest. Among its many achievements are three important main lines which remain important arteries today: “the Overland Route (San Francisco to the Midwest), the Golden State Route (the Southwest to Kansas City), and the Sunset Route (the Pacific Coast to the Gulf Coast). In addition, SPRR had numerous famous passenger trains bedecked in its celebrated “Daylight” livery of bright red and orange (with black and white trim) (American-rails.com 2007—2010). Despite the railroad’s success, in the 1970s, SPRR suffered and in the late 1980s, it was purchased by the Denver and Rio Grande Western, which made the unusual decision to keep the SPRR name (ibid.). In 1996, SPRR merged with the smaller UPRR, a move that proved quite difficult for UPRR as it was not equipped to handle the increased operations (ibid.). However, by the end of the 1990s, UPRR was once again running smoothly (ibid.).

Significance Evaluation.

Under National Register criterion
A and California Register criterion 1, the railroad as a whole played an important role in the history of California and in the early development and success of the City of Cotton. The City is named for a former SPRR Vice President and the SPRR was apparently involved in the construction of various commercial and civic buildings, as well as the marketing of the town. In addition, the large rail yard that was once located in the project APE and along a portion of the subject rail segment, contributed greatly to the area’s early economic success. However, the SPRR monopoly did not always work to the advantage of Colton. In 1883, a portion of this segment known as Colton Crossing was the location of a standoff with the California Southern, a competing railroad associated with the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe (ATSF). As discussed above, this type of standoff or frog war was a fairly common occurrence in the late l9 and early 20th centuries throughout California and the country and, in this case, was one of a series of events that led to the inevitable breaking of the SPRR monopoly. Ultimately, the California Southern crossed the SPRR in Colton increasing competition and improving Colton’s situation as a shipping center (Jones 1951). However, after just two years, the ATSF built its mainline from San Bernardino to Los Angeles and Colton was relegated to branch status; thus, the real benefit of the crossing was reaped by San Bernardino, which transformed from a stage station to a railroad center (Jones 1951:25; Ingersoll 1904:377). The SPRR benefited many communities along its route, some of which it founded and others that simply prospered because of it. The City of Colton is one of those cities that benefited greatly from the attention it received from the SPRR, especially during the .ommunity’s early history. However, this segment of the SPRR and its setting have experienced numerous alterations which have severely compromised its integrity of setting, feeling, and association. For example, the vast majority of the (See Continuation Sheet) DPR 523L (1195) *Requlred Information R:\HDRO8O2_Colton CrossingCulturalDPR forms\Built resources for HRER01 UP tracks.do 1274
State of California
— The Resources Agency
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION Primary # 36-010330 (Update) CONTINUATION SHEET HRI#______________
Trinomial CA-SBR-10330H

Page 5 of 5 ends

*Recorded by LSA Associates, Inc. Date: May 2010
X Continuation
Update
*B1o. Significance (Continued from page 4)
rail yard buildings, features, and tracks, as well as all but two historic-period railroad related buildings have been removed. In addition, construction of 1-10, the La Cadena underpass and the Rancho Avenue overpass, along with alterations to the two remaining historic- period buildings (the former SPRR depot and the former American Railway Express Company building) have severely Compromised the historic setting and diminished the historic character of the area as a whole. As a result of all of these changes, there is nothing physical at the crossing or along this segment of the SPRR that demonstrates or conveys any significance under this criterion. Therefore it is not eligible for listing in the National Register under this criterion.

Under National Register criterion B and California Register criterion 2, the railroad as a whole is associated with persons important in history, but this segment does not appear to be more closely associated with those people than any other part of the railroad. As discussed above, Colton Crossing has a minor association with Virgil Earp in his capacity as a law enforcement officer. In 1881, Virgil was Chief of Police ri Tombstone, Arizona when the famed shootout at the O.K. Corral occurred, Shortly thereafter, to recuperate, he moved to Colton where his parents lived. In 1883, acting on behalf of the SPRR, Virgil stood guard against the construction of the railroad crossing by California Southern until a court order was produced allowing construction to proceed. In 1887, Virgil became the City’s first Marshall and he lived in a home that still stands just north of 1-10. He remained in Colton until 1893 when he moved to Vanderbilt. He returned to Colton for a short time in 1904 before moving to Goldfield where he died in 1905. Although Virgil Earp is a known figure in history, he is most famous as the brother of Wyatt Earp and for his involvement in the O.K. Corral shootout, rather than for his individual accomplishments as a lawman or any historically important contributions to the field of law enforcement. While he may have gained some importance in local history as the City’s first Marshall, he was not elected to this position until four years after the Colton Crossing dispute. Further, the crossing incident was Just one of numerous law enforcement situations in which Virgil was involved during his long career. For these reasons, this segment of railroad does not appear to be significant for its association with Virgil Earp.

Under National Register criterion
C and California Register criterion 3, although it has necessarily been modernized over time, this segment embodies the typical characteristics of railroad construction and is representative of thousands of miles of other track in the ‘egion. Neither the tracks nor the few related features appear to be the work of a master and neither possesses high artistic value. As discussed above, the crossing itself is not particularly unique as there are numerous at-grade rail-to-rail crossings in California and throughout the country. Therefore, neither this segment nor the crossing appears to be significant under this criterion. Under National Register criterion D and California Register criterion 4, which is usually associated with archaeological resources, this segment of the railroad has not yielded, nor is it likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. In rare instances, structures can serve as sources of important information about historic construction materials or technologies under criteria D14. However, this type of property is otherwise well-documented; it is well represented locally and on a statewide level, both in written and visual materials and there are better examples of railroads elsewhere in the area/regionlstate. It does not appear to be an important source of primary information. For these reasons, this segment of the railroad does not appear to meet the criteria for listing in the National Register or the California Register. It would also not be a contributing segment to the historical significance of the overall railroad, should the railroad as a whole be determined significant. Although the railroad segment was not evaluated under the local preservation ordinance, research indicates that it is not currently listed in the City’s register of historic resources or districts.

It should be noted that the larger area within which this segment is located was considered for potential as a historic district since it is the location of the original the Southern Pacific rail yard in Colton. However, most of the rail yard buildings have been demolished and tracks have been removed/realigned. Therefore, the area appears to lack the integrity necessary to qualify as a historic district. *812 References: (Continued from page 2)
Jones, Clark Harding
1951
A History of the Development and Progress of Colton, California 1873-1900.

A Masters thesis on file at the Colton Public
Library.

Orsi, Richard J.
2005 Sunset Limited, The Southern Pacific Railroad and the Development of the American West 1850-1930. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
1885, 1887, 1888, 1891, 1894, 1907, and 1950 Accessed online through the Los Angeles Public Library at: http:/Iwww.lapl.org/. The Press arid Horticulturist 1883 Railroad War, C.S.R.R. vs. S.P.R.R. August 11, page 2. On file at the University of California, Riverside, Rivera Library. Union Pacific Railroad 1895 Map of the Southern Pacific Railroad through Colton. Obtained from John Bromley, Director of Historic Programs, Union Pacific Railroad.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required Information R:\HDRO8O2_Colton Crossing\Cultural\DPR forms\Built resources for I-IRER\O1 UP tracks.doc 1275
})‘/ I
*p3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This segment of the Union Pacific Railroad (formerly the Southern Pacific Railroad) is located in the City of Loma Linda, atAnderson Street. This area is urbanized. The railroad appears to be subject to ongoing routine maintenance, which would include replacement of tracks and associated materials as needed. The track bed is ballast and ties have been replaced by concrete.

Because of the alterations to the railroad tracks and the alternation of setting over the past 100 years since the inception of therailroad, this segment does not retain requisite integrity to qualify for listing in the National or California registers. *P3b Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) AH7- Railroad Grade *4 Resources Present: LiBuilding • Structure DObject DSite DDistrict *P1 1. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter ‘none.”) DElement of District EJOther (Isolates, etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for
buildings, structures, and objects.)
P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date,
accession #)Photograph of the railroad crossing at
Anderson Street, view to west, Photo
#4513.
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources:
• Historic
DPrehistoric EBoth
circa 1882
*7 Owner and Address:

Union Pacific Railroad
1400 Douglas Street
Omaha, NE 68179
*p8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation, andaddress)
Caprice D. (Kip) Harper
SWCA Environmental Consultants
625 Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 190
South Pasadena, CA 91030 *9 Date Recorded:

October 7, 2008
Survey Type: (Describe) Intensive
Cultural Resources Technical Report sbX E Street Corridor BRT Project, Cities of San Bernardino and Loma Linda, San Bernardino County, California (SWCA Environmental Consultants 2008).

Primary Record for P-36-010330 (Askar 1999)
*Allachments: ONONE ILocation Map DSketch Map DContinuation Sheet LiBuilding, Structure, and Object Record [ EArchaeological Record EDistrict Record ELinear Feature Record EMilling Station Record ERock Art Record DArtifact Record UPhotograph Record Li Other (List):

State of California—The Resources Agency Primary # P-36-010330 (update) DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial CA-SBR-10330H (update)
NRHP Status Code
Other Listings
Review Code Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 2 ends

P1. Other Identifier: Southern Pacific Railroad
Location: • Not for Publication Li Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino [ and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5 Quad: San Bernardino South Date: 1967 (PR 1988) T 15 ;R 4W; unsectioned ¼ of 1/4 of Sec S.B B.M. c. Address: City: San Bernardino Zip:
d. UTM: Zone: 11 mE/ mN (G.P.S.)e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) Elevation: approx. 1,078 feet amsl This segment is located in the City of Loma Linda, at Anderson Street.

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
1276
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # P-36-010330 (update) DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LOCATI0N MAP Trinomial CA-SBR-10330H (update)

Page 2 of 2 ends

*Map Name: San Bernardino South, CA
*Resource Name or #: Union Pacific Railroad Crossing at Anderson Street agrng ---
Well
- BM
TRI-CITY AIRPORT 1C44
*Scale: 1:24,000 *Date of Map: 1967 (Photorevised 1980) ‘
i 11’ L _Union Pacific Railroad crossing
Mete
0 1000 2000
r—r—Feet
USGS 7.5’ Quadrangle 1:24,000
San Bernardino South, CA 1967 (Photorevised 1980)
1v

1.’ JL’._ ..

GRANT DY .

S. a , — — •i BARTON— — — — —
2 -.
-
/ ‘:‘
IT .) .CQOLE
L A Kern
1061 F1
Z4NJA
Ri q
:i•1
San
Bernardino
ntura Los
Angeles
Resource Location
Orange Riserside
San Diego
,J
;::_ :\--
-
-
H --
• Cultural Resource
DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information
1277
aliora —The rces Agency ‘

PR(ENT OF PAS AND RECREATION
1ñXRY
Review Revieer
Page j...... ofj....... *Resource Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) Southern Pacific Railroad -Hunts Lane Crossing P1. Other Identifier:
*p2. Location: C Not for Publication Unrestricted *a. County San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5’ Quad San Bernardino South Date 1967 PR 1980 TJ, R unsectioned portion;..,B.M. c. Address Hunt’s Lane South City San Bernardino and Colton Zipd. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone ,..IL.. East end: 474310 mE / 3768440 mN West end: 472640 mE / 3768790 mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)From Interstate 10, exit Waterman Avenue south; turn right on Redlands Boulevard and proceed west for approximately onehalf mile. Turn left on Hunts Lane and proceed south for approximately one-quarter mile. Hunts Lane crosses the railroad at the midpoint ofthis segment. This segment of railroad extends from Interstate 215 on the west to Waterman Avenue on the east.
*p3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This one-mile segment of line is a portion of the Southern Pacific Railroad (SPRR). The SPRR was constructed in 1876 as part ofthe transcontinental route from Los Angeles to Texas. The line from Los Angeles to the cities of San Bernardino and Colton (Hunts Lane) was completed the previous year. This segment is in good condition and is still in use. *P3b Resource Attributes: (Ustanributesandcodes) Railroad route/line (AH7)*4 Resources Present: C] Building Structure C Object C Site C District C Element of District C] Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View, data,accession
)_________________________________
CA-SBR-10330 ph. View westof Southern Pacific line crossingSouth Hunts Lane. *p6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: ir,storic
C] Prehistoric D Both
1875: Gudde, Erwin G. 1969
California Place Names*p7• Owner and Address:

Southern Pacific Railroad
*p8. Recorded by: (Name, affiliation,and address): Riordan Goodwin LSA Associates., Inc.
1650 Spruce Street, 5th Floor
Riverside, CA 92507
*9 Date recorded: 6/6/02J0w Survey Type: (Describe)
Road
* P11. Report citation: (Cite survey report and other sources or enter “none.”) LSA Associates. Inc. 2002 Cultural Resources Assessment, Hunts Grade Separation Project, San Bernardino, California. 5a. Photograph or Drawing: (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) Attachments: None nLocation Map DSketch Map CContinuation Sheet CBuilding, Structure, and Object Record CArchaeological Record DDistrict Record Linear Feature Record DMilling Station Record CRock Art Record DArtifact Record CPhotograph Record DOther (List)
6/I 8/02<<P:\MANI3O\Cultural\PRJMARY.wpd>>
1278
—
—
—
— _;
—
—
—
— mm
—
— ,—
—
—
—
*z
(D
C,,
C,,
JlD
C,,
S. 0
C,, 0
(D0II
*
C,, 0
k.) C*
CD0-0
CD
00C
1279
I . . •---
St91c of California The Recourcs A’cncy Pnm 4i# P 6 0104 ‘(J -a” .,j - . . r-tca . a,... -. .

DEMR’lMENT OFP RKS Ai1) RECRkVI ION t HRJ#
?VXi:FEATURE.
.,...
‘
Page ,..._ ofj....... *Resollrce Name or #: (Assigned by recorder) c’uthcrn Pacific Railroad -Hunts Lane Crossine Li.

Historic and/or Common Name:__________________________________________________________________________ L2a. Portion Described: D Entire Resource Segment U Point Observation Designation:
b. Location of point or segment: (Provide UTM coordinates, legal description, and any other useful locational data. Show the area that has been field inspected on a Location Map) East end: 474310 mE / 3768440 mN; West end: 472640 mE / 3768790 mN L3. Description: (aescribe construction details, materials, and artifacts found at this segmenh)point. Pruvide plans/sections as eppropnate.) This is a segment ofstandard gauge line with multiple sidings west of Hunts Lane L4. Dimensions: (In feet for historic features and
meters for prehistoric features)
a. Top Width standard railroad gauge (-4’-8”)
b. Bottom Widtb —12’ to 15’
c. Height or Depth —2’-6”
d. Length of Segment —1/2 mile
L5. Associated Resources:

Con-Agra grain mill with multiple sidings on north
side of Southern Pacific Line.

L6.

Setting: (Describe natural features, landscape characteristics, slope, etc., as appropriate.) This segment ofline is in a built-up urban environment, has virtually no slope and runs across Hunts Lane. The city limits between San Bernardino and Colton run along this portion of Hunts Lane.

L7. Integrity Considerations: This segment ofthe railroad line is currently in good condition and still in use.

L8b. Description
of Photo, Map, or
Drawing (view,
scale, etc.)
View from San
Bernardino South
USGS quad 1:12000
L9. Remarks:

L1O Form
Prepared by:

Riordan Goodwin
LSA Associates.,
Inc.

Lii. Date: 6/12/02
L4e. Sketch of Cross Section (include scale) Facing: west L8a. Photograph, Map or Drawing
/ I ‘
‘
‘I
‘7 H
DPR 523A (1/95)
‘Tctf51Ii1ID.tk( AMI 2rttC,.Ih,r,.Ilf5rmctT PP wnd
*Required Information
1280
Stte of California — The Resources Agency Primary # Of 0 3 () DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION

PRIMARY RECORD
mial 3,E’O 3o
NRHP Status Code
Other ListingsReview Code
Reviewer Date

Page 1 of 12 ends

P1. Other Identifier: Union Pacific Railroad. Southern Pacific Railroad *P2 Location: Q Not for Publication Unrestricted *a County Los Angeles and G and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b USGS 7.5’ Quad see below Date_________
c. Address
City______________________________
d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone:_________ mE/
mN
e. Other Locational Data: (e.g. parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) This segment of the railroad is located on the following USGS quads: Los Angeles (1966, PR 1981), El Monte (PR 1994), Baldwin Park (PR 1981), La Habra (PR 1981), San Dimas (PR 1981), Ontario (PR 1981), Guasti (PR 1981), Fontana (PR 1980), and San Bernardino South (PR 1980). *P3a Description (Describe resource and its major elements, Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) The Union Pacific Railroad (hsitorically the Southern Pacific Railroad) is a standard gauge railroad which runs through the Los Angeles area. It is part of a larger resource, the Union Pacific Railroad line. Numerous associated features include railroad stations, sidings, spurs, and railyards.

The rail lines that were included in our survey areas were all acquired by Union Pacific, but were originally other railroadlines. These include the Southern Pacific, and the Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad. The Southern Pacific through Los Angeles area was constructed in the 1870s, and originally ran south from Los Angeles through Watts and Compton to Willmington. and east from Los Angeles through Alhambra, San Gabriel, Puente, Pomona and on through Coltonbefore heading toward Yuma. ( See continuation sheet.) P5b. Description of Photo: (View,date,accession #)
*p6. Date Constructed/Age and
*7 Owner and Address:

Union Pacific Railroad
*P8 Recorded by: (Name,
affiliation, and address) S. Ashkar
Jone s & Stokes Associates, Inc.2600 V Street, Suite 100Sacramento, CA 95818 *9 Date Recorded: 6/22/99
Survey Type: (Describe)
Cursory and Intensive pedestrian
T______ R______ ‘hof %ofSec;
Zip___________ P5a. Photograph or Drawing (Photograph required for buildings, structures, and objects) *P3b Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP39. Other -Railroad *4 Resources present: “1 Building :X Structure Object .Site E District ‘Element of District Other (isolates, etc.) Sources: Li Prehistoric 1870s - øresent Historic Both *Attachments: NONE
Archaeological Record
fl Artifact Record
*p.
,Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter “none.”) Jones & Stokes. 1999. Cultural Resources Inventory for the Williams Communication Fiber Optic alignment between Los Angeles and Riverside, Los Angeles and Riverside Counties, California. surveys
Location Map Sketch Map [ Continuation Sheet ‘K’ Building, Structure, and Object RecordE District Record Linear Feature Record Milling Station Record {“l Rock Art Record El Photograph Record El Other (List):

DPR 523A (1/95) *Required Information
1281
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # <7— i’,, J() 3() DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD S&-/0, 33JiW

Page 2 of 12 ends

Southern Pacific Railroad
*NRHP Status Code
*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) C-Los Angeles-A-i Bi.B2.

B3.
*B5*B6 Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Major portion of track and associated spurs, sidings, and station were constructed between 1869 and 1905. The tracks are currently in use and maintenance and replacement continue.
*B7. Moved? XNo ‘Yes flhinknown Date:___________ Original Location:
*B8. Related Features:

Numerous sidings; spurs, stations and railyards
B9a. Architect:
b. Builder:_________________________________________________ *Blo Significance: Theme: Railroad Area: California, U.S.

Period of Significance: 1869 to present Property Type: railroad Applicable Criteria: A, B (Discuss imporance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity.)Portions of this railroad are additions to the first transcontinental railroad. Other portions were instrumental in the development of Los Angeles and other communities as business centers. The modern Union Pacific Railroad system is made up of other, often smaller historic railroads that helped to form the economy and population of Southern California. The rail system enabled the transportation of goods to ports and the emmigration of large numbers of people. The railroad is also associated with a number of important historical figures, including the Big Four (Mark Hopkins, Collis P. Huntington, Leland Stanford, and Charles Crocker). Therefore, the historic railroad is eligible for NRHP listing under Criteria A and B.

Bi 1. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12 References:

B13. Remarks:
‘B14.Evaluator: S. Ashkar Jones & Stokes
2600 V Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 9581 8-1 914
Historic Name:

Common Name:

Original Use: railroad
Architectural Style:

Union Pacific Railroad
B4. Present Use: railroad
(Sketch Map with north arrow required.)
*Date of Evaluation: 6/22/99
(This space reserved for official comments.)
DPR 523 B (1/95) *Required Information
1282
Stdte of California — The Resources Agency Primary # !K ‘ 0 /ü DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
____________
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial /0 3.Z

Page 3 of 12 ends

*Recorded by S. Ashkar, M. Avina, E. Prendergast, J. Doty *Date 6/22/99 Lj’ Continuation Update P3a. Description
Another Southern Pacific Line headed southeast from Watts through Norwalk and Buena Park to Santa Ana.

The San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake Railroad Company was formed in 1901 for the purpose of constructing a rail line between Los Angeles and Salt Lake City. The line formally opened on May 1, 1905. The line extended north from Los Angeles to Las Vegas and on to Salt Lake City. Other lines ran from Los Angeles south to Wilmington via Bells and Workman, and east from Los Angeles through Pico, Clayton, paralleling the Southern Pacific line through Walnut, Sprada and Ontario and dipping south from there towards Riverside. The name was shortened to the LosAngeles and Salt Lake in 1916. In 1921, the line became the southwestern arm of the Union Pacific. (Fickewirth 1992; Hofsommer 1986; Myrick 1992.)
The Southern Pacific eventually absorbed the smaller rail lines and the Southern Pacific emerged as the name for the system in 1884 when the Southern Pacific Company of Kentucky was incorporated.

References:

Fickewirth, A. A. 1992. California Railroads. Golden West Books. San Marino, California Hofsommer, Don L. 1986. The Southern Pacific, 1901-1985. Texas A & lvi University Press. College Station, Texas.

Myrick, D. F. 1992. Railroads ofNevada and Eastern Calfornia. Volume II. Southern Roads. University of Nevada Press. Reno, Nevada.

DPR 523L (1/95) *Required information
1283
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # P3 D
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
LOCATION MAP Trinomial 31

Page 4 of 12 ends

*Resource Name or #: C-Los Angeles -A-i; Southern Pacific Railroad *Map Name: Los Angeles, California *Scale: 1:80.000 (1=6.666) *Date of Map: MR 1994 s 0 5000
* 4’
feet
Scale = 1:80,000
Base map: USGS 7.5-series Los Angeles, TN
=
California, quadrangle (1966, MR 1994)
DPR 523J (1195) *Required InformatIon
1284
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # :; 1c DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #_______________________________________ LOCATION MAP Trinomial N)/. /O, 3c)

Page 5 of 12 ends

*Resource Name or #: C-Los Angeles - A-i; Southern Pacific Railroad *MapName: El Monte, California *Scale: 1:80,000 (1”6,666) *DateofMap: MR 1994 —
—
—
— I
1 —
—
—
S
‘
,
__
‘ :l4 ‘
.-
‘
-
. - . • ‘
:‘ - / -. , — , - : .
-‘
. - -
, .- -
-: •
.- . - :j
‘
.-
.
•5__
I.
:r- “
.
*
. - . -
C
,- - - - - 1_. .j , - .1 .-
c - /
I_;::.r _ —C _! ‘ _ - \Z I S _i L • ‘‘ - ., ..
.
.
- t_ -
SPRR .3:4i,- I
ill
r -. -
i” :
r__•• — —
*
— -
-
f - -9 J
-
4 3. 4
-.---
-
-
-
0 5,000 k’
feet
Scale = 1:80000
Base map: USGS 7.5-series El Monte, TN mN
California, quadrangle (1966. M 1994)
DPR 523J (1/95) *Required informatf on
,I11
1285
I—
D) O)
, a-•1
‘? - ! ,_ —I
Z•11D
WC)
I7ccD
C’) zo
-
0 m
C
CD
-U
C.).

CD
0 3
Ii
Ii
-Cfl
0 0
0 0
1286
State of California
— The Resources Agency Primary # — I 330 DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #________________________________________ LOCATION MAP Trinomial C’
f
3 O 1k

Page 7 of 12 ends

flesource Name or C-Los Angeles -A-I; Southern Pacific Railroad *Map Name: La Habra, California *Scale: 1 :80,000 (1=6,666’) *Date of Map: PR 1981 0 .ooo
* i’
feet
Scale = 1:80,000
Base map: USGS 7.5-series La Habra, TN
Celifornia, quadrangle (1964. PR 1981)
DPR 523J (1195) Requtred tntormatlon
1287
State of California
— The Resources Agency Primary # 0/0 330
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
LOCATION MAP Trinomial R-/O 350fr

Page 8 ends

*Resource Name or #: C-Los Angeles - A-i; Southern Pacific Railroad *Map Name: San Dimas. California *Scale: 1 :80000 (1=6,666) *Date of Map: PR 1981 s 0 5000
*
——
Scale = 1:80000
Base map: USGS 5-series San Dimas, TN /mN
. California. quadrangle (1966. PR 1981)
DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information
1288
> --
if .
z
w&’
cc0
0)4
0•O
<cc
cmi
0)4
C,—
4 F- 0
w
Ecc ()
0 a)
a.
0-
cc
a,
C
Ca
0)
a)
ci ci o co
a)
C
0 ct
C-)
C-)
cc
ci
U)
<0
C
0)
Cl)
0 D
-c
0 o ci
3t
00 -?
0 c’_l
Ca
a)
a’ z
E0)
0)
C)
0•
0)
0 C
0 E
ta
0 C
S
0 0
C.’
C
0 0
rn
C—
(0
C
C
C
C
(0
(0
(0
1289
State of California — The Resources Agency Primary # 77ç3( / 0 330

DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
HRI #
LOCATION MAP Trinomial )332*

Page 10 of 12 ends

*Resource Name or #: C-Los Angeles - A-i; Southern Pacific Railroad *Map Name: Guasti, California *ScaIe: 1:80,000 (1=6,666) DateofMap: PR 1981 I - I —
-; , —
I
I-.
- ( ; -
- - I I
___J I
0 5,000
S I
\ feet Scale = 1:80,000
Base map: USGS 7.5-series Guasti, TN ‘mN
California, quadrangle (1966, PR 1981)
DPR 523J (1/95) *Required information
1290
c
c’c) 0
z
0) Lii -
ii
cr0
2cr
ww
(1)0
<cr
0 w
ocr
Q
._J
U)
(U
U) 0
(Ua
0)0
CO0
C-)
(0
00 (00 0
aa)
-cc
cJ)C)
I)
(1)0
(I)0
_J
0C
0)
(U
0) 0
41:

Owt
0)
WInD. W (U
030
U)
•00E
(U0
Drc
ii
(00p00
(0
(0
(0
a-E
CU
43:
1291

Page 12 of 12 ends

*Resource Name or #: C-Los Angeles - A-i; Southern Pacific Railroad -
. :.
-
1 -
-
-
‘
- SPRR ‘
-
F
-._-i-; I
- ‘- F-it-k g’-
- \ 7
- -; : - y —- -‘ .—-;. -,.-,. —‘:--
.f -. i! f I
Si 3I
, ,“. ,‘ ‘1 - . -;%_.__. ‘,- —.A I’
— 11-
—s-— — —
-‘
: -, _[ - - -
-
------
.i. .,‘,__-../• .I
--‘-: --
-
0 5,000
feet
Scale = 180000
Base map: USGS 7.5-series San Bernardino,
California, quadrangle (1967. PR 1980)
Map Name:

State of CaTifornia — The Resources Agency Primary # OlO -L DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # LOCATION MAP Trinomial -e/0,)fr
San Bernardino South, California *ScaIe: 1:80,000 (1=6,666) *Dateof Map: PR 1980 DPR 523J (1/95)
5’
TN
1292
1293
1294
Report List
Report No. Other IDs Year Author(s) Title Affiliation Resources 5355 Airport Dr 22-144
SB-02795 1991 CULTURAL RESOURCE INVESTIGATION:

CAJON PIPELINE PROJECT

GREENWOOD &

ASSOCIATES
HAMPSON, R. PAUL,
JAMES J. SCHMIDT,
AND JUNE A. SCHMIDT
36-002910, 36-004252, 36-004253,
36-004255, 36-004268, 36-004271,
36-004272, 36-004411, 36-004418,
36-005361, 36-005362, 36-005568,
36-006793, 36-007076, 36-007077,
36-007078, 36-007079, 36-007080,
36-007081, 36-007082, 36-007084,
36-007085, 36-007086, 36-007087,
36-007088, 36-007089, 36-007090,
36-007091, 36-007092, 36-007093,
36-007094, 36-007095, 36-007096
NADB-R - 1062795
SB-02979 1993 ARCHAEOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE

SURVEY REPORT MIDDLE LUGO-MIRA
LOMA 500KV T/L RIGHT-OF-WAY

BETWEEN CONCOURS AND JURUPA
AVE., ONTARIO, CA
Southern California Edison
Company
NADB-R - 1062979 TAYLOR, THOMAS T. 36-008076
SB-03580 2000 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT
FROM PBW FACILITY CM 359-07, COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 5PP
NADB-R - 1063580 DUKE, CURT LSA
SB-03586 2000 ONTARIO TO COLTON PIPELINE, SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY, CA. 26PP
NADB-R - 1063586 LOVE, BRUCE CRM TECH 36-006859
SB-04166 1999 I-10 INTERCHANGE AT ETIWANDA AVE.
5PP
NADB-R - 1064166 MCLEAN, DEBORAH LSA
SB-05912 2008 Results of a Cultural Resources Assessment for the Southern California Edison
Replacement of Deteriorated Pole No.
1504970E located on the Hygen-Linde 66kV
Line near Fontana, San Bernardino County,
California.

NADB-R - 1065912 Ahmet, Koral Southern California Edison

Page 1 of 1 ends

1295
5355 East Airport Drive

ENERGY ANALYSIS

CITY OF ONTARIO
PREPARED BY:

Haseeb Qureshi
[email protected]

Alyssa Barnett
[email protected]
AUGUST 30, 2022
14539-03 EA Report
1296
1297
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................I APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................................II LIST OF EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................................II LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................II LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS............................................................................................................III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................6 ES.1 Summary of Findings..................................................................................................................... 6 ES.2 Project Requirements................................................................................................................... 6 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................8

1.1 Site Location.................................................................................................................................. 8

1.2 Project Description........................................................................................................................ 8 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................12

2.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 12

2.2 Electricity..................................................................................................................................... 14

2.3 Natural Gas ................................................................................................................................. 16

2.4 Transportation Energy Resources............................................................................................... 19 3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................22

3.1 Federal Regulations..................................................................................................................... 22

3.2 California Regulations................................................................................................................. 22 4 EXISTING PROJECT SITE ENERGY DEMANDS..............................................................................27

4.1 Existing Operational Energy Demands........................................................................................ 27 5 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES ...........................................29

5.1 Evaluation Criteria....................................................................................................................... 29

5.2 Methodology............................................................................................................................... 29

5.3 Construction Energy Demands ................................................................................................... 30

5.4 Operational Energy Demands..................................................................................................... 38

5.5 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 41 6 CONCLUSIONS.........................................................................................................................45 7 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................49 8 CERTIFICATIONS ......................................................................................................................52 1298
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
ii

APPENDICES
APPENDIX 4.1: CALEEMOD EXISTING OPERATIONS EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 5.1: CALEEMOD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 5.2: CALEEMOD PROJECT OPERATIONS EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS APPENDIX 5.3: EMFAC2021

LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP.............................................................................................................9 EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN....................................................................................................................10

LIST OF TABLES
TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS .................................................................6 TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2021)....................................................13 TABLE 2-2: SCE 2020 POWER CONTENT MIX......................................................................................16 TABLE 5-1: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION (ALL VEHICLES) .......27 TABLE 5-2: EXISTING ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY......................................27 TABLE 5-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION.............................................................................................30 TABLE 5-2: CONSTRUCTION POWER COST.........................................................................................31 TABLE 5-3: CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE ...............................................................................31 TABLE 5-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS ...................................................................32 TABLE 5-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES........................................33 TABLE 5-6: CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT.....................................................................................34 TABLE 5-7: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES.............................................35 TABLE 5-8: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES .............................................36 TABLE 5-9: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION...............................39 TABLE 5-10: ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES.....................39 TABLE 5-11: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY.....................................40 1299
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
iii

LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS
% Percent
(1) Reference
AGSP Airport Gateway Specific Plan
AQIA 5355 East Airport Drive Air Quality Impact Analysis BACM Best Available Control Measures
BTU British Thermal Units
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board
CCAP Community Climate Action Plan
CCR California Code of Regulations
CEC California Energy Commission
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
City City of Ontario
CPEP Clean Power and Electrification Pathway
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
DMV Department of Motor Vehicles
EIA Energy Information Administration
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EMFAC EMissions FACtor
FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
GHG Greenhouse Gas
GWh Gigawatt Hour
HHD Heavy-Heavy Duty Trucks
hp-hr-gal Horsepower Hours Per Gallon
IEPR Integrated Energy Policy Report
ISO Independent Service Operator
ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act
ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers
kBTU Thousand-British Thermal Units
kWh Kilowatt Hour
LDA Light Duty Auto
LDT1/LDT2 Light-Duty Trucks
LHD1/LHD2 Light-Heavy Duty Trucks
MDV Medium Duty Trucks
MHD Medium-Heavy Duty Trucks
1300
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
iv
MMcfd Million Cubic Feet Per Day
mpg Miles Per Gallon
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric
Project 5355 East Airport Drive
PV Photovoltaic
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCE Southern California Edison
SDAB San Diego Air Basin
SEIR The Ontario Plan 2050 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
sf Square Feet
SoCalGas Southern California Gas
TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
U.S. United States
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
1301
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
v
This page intentionally left blank
1302
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ES.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
The results of this 5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis is summarized below based on the significance criteria in Section 6 of this report consistent with Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Statute and Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines) (1). Table ES-1 shows the findings of significance for potential energy impacts under CEQA.

TABLE ES-1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS
Analysis Report
Section
Significance Findings
Unmitigated Mitigated
Energy Impact #1: Would the Project result in
potentially significant environmental impact due
to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary
consumption of energy resources, during project
construction or operation?

6.0 Less Than Significant n/a
Energy Impact #2: Would the Project conflict
with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?

6.0 Less Than Significant n/a
ES.2 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
The Project would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the federal and state agencies that regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs. Those that are directly and indirectly applicable to the Project and that would assist in the reduction of energy usage include:
• Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) • The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21 • Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR)
• State of California Energy Plan
• California Code Title 24, Part 6, Energy Efficiency Standards • California Code Title 24, Part 11, California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) • AB 1493 Pavley Regulations and Fuel Efficiency Standards • California’s Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS)
• Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 (SB 350) Consistency with the above regulations is discussed in detail in section 6 of this report. 1303
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
7 This page intentionally left blank
1304
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
8 1 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the energy analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc., for the proposed 5355 East Airport Drive Project (Project). The purpose of this report is to ensure that energy implication is considered by the City of Ontario (Lead Agency), as the lead agency, and to quantify anticipated energy usage associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project, determine if the usage amounts are efficient, typical, or wasteful for the land use type, and to emphasize avoiding or reducing inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy.

1.1 SITE LOCATION
The proposed Project is located at 5355 East Airport Drive in the City of Ontario as shown on Exhibit 1-A. The Project is located approximately 2.7 miles east of the Ontario International Airport (ONT).

1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Project is proposed to consist of a single 270,337-square-feet (sf) industrial building. This analysis assumes up to 27,034-sf high-cube cold storage use (10 percent [%] of the total industrial building sf) and 243,303-sf of warehouse use (90% of total industrial building). The site plan for the proposed Project is shown on Exhibit 1-B.
1305
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
9 EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP
1306
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
10 EXHIBIT 1-B: SITE PLAN
1307
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
11 This page intentionally left blank
1308
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
12 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
This section provides an overview of the existing energy conditions in the Project region.

2.1 OVERVIEW
The most recent data for California’s estimated total energy consumption and natural gas consumption is from 2020, released by the United States (U.S.) Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) California State Profile and Energy Estimates in 2021 and included (2):
• As of 2020, approximately 6,923 trillion British Thermal Unit (BTU) of energy was consumed • As of 2020, approximately 524 million barrels of petroleum • As of 2020, approximately 2,075 billion cubic feet of natural gas • As of 2020, approximately 1 million short tons of coal The California Energy Commission’s (CEC) Transportation Energy Demand Forecast released the 2018-2030 was released in order to support the 2017 Integrated Energy Policy Report. The Transportation energy Demand Forecast 2018-2030 lays out graphs and data supporting CEC’s projections of California’s future transportation energy demand. The projected inputs consider expected variable changes in fuel prices, income, population, and other variables. Predictions regarding fuel demand included:
• Gasoline demand in the transportation sector is expected to decline from approximately 15.8 billion gallons in 2017 to between 12.3 billion and 12.7 billion gallons in 2030 (3) • Diesel demand in the transportation sector is expected to rise, increasing from approximately 3.7 billion diesel gallons in 2015 to approximately 4.7 billion in 2030 (3) • Data from the Department of Energy states that approximately 3.9 billion gallons of diesel fuel were consumed in 2019 (4)
The most recent data provided by the EIA for energy use in California by demand sector is from 2020 and is reported as follows:
• Approximately 34.0% transportation
• Approximately 24.6% industrial
• Approximately 21.8% residential
• Approximately 19.6% commercial (5)
In 2021, total system electric generation for California was 277,764 gigawatt hours (GWh).

California's massive electricity in-state generation system generated approximately 194,127 GWh which accounted for approximately 70% of the electricity it uses; the rest was imported from the Pacific Northwest (12%) and the U.S. Southwest (18%) (6). Natural gas is the main source for electricity generation at 50.19% of the total in-state electric generation system power as shown in Table 2-1.
1309
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
13 TABLE 2-1: TOTAL ELECRICITY SYSTEM POWER (CALIFORNIA 2021) Fuel Type California In-State
Generation (GWh)
% of California InState Generation
Northwest
Imports
(GWh)
Southwest
Imports
(GWh)
Total
Imports
(GWh)
% of
Imports
Total
California
Energy
Mix
(GWh)
Total
California
Power Mix
Coal 303 0.2% 181 7,788 7,969 9.5% 8,272 3.0%
Natural Gas 97,431 50.2% 45 7,880 7,925 9.5% 105,356 379.0% Oil 37 0.0% - - - 0.0% 37 0.0%
Other
(Waste Heat/Petroleum Coke) 382 0.2% 68 15 83 0.1% 465 0.2% Nuclear 16,477 8.5% 524 8,756 9,281 11.1% 25,758 9.3%
Large Hydro 12,036 6.2% 12,042 1,578 13,620 16.3% 25,656 9.2% Unspecified - 0.0% 8,156 10,731 18,887 22.6% 18,887 6.8% Total Thermal and
Non-Renewables 126,666 65.2% 21,017 36,748 57,764 6910.0% 184,431 66.4% Biomass 5,381 2.8% 864 26 890 1.1% 6,271 2.3%
Geothermal 11,116 5.7% 192 1,906 2,098 2.5% 13,214 4.8% Small Hydro 2,531 1.3% 304 1 304 0.4% 2,835 1.0%
Solar 33,260 17.1% 220 5,979 6,199 7.4% 39,458 14.2%
Wind 15,173 7.8% 9,976 6,405 16,381 19.6% 31,555 11.4%
Total Renewables 67,461 34.8% 11,555 14,317 25,872 3090.0% 93,333 33.6% SYSTEM TOTALS 194,127 100.0% 32,572 51,064 83,636 100.0% 277,764 100.0% Source: CECs 2021 Total System Electric Generation
1310
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
14 An updated summary of, and context for energy consumption and energy demands within the State is presented in “U.S. Energy Information Administration, California State Profile and Energy Estimates, Quick Facts” excerpted below (7):
• In 2021, California was the seventh-largest producer of crude oil among the 50 states, and, as of January 2021, it ranked third in crude oil refining capacity. • California is the largest consumer of jet fuel and second-largest consumer of motor gasoline among the 50 states and, the state accounted for 15% of the nation’s jet fuel consumption and 10% of motor gasoline consumption in 2020.
• In 2019, California was the second-largest total energy consumer among the states, but its per capita energy consumption was less than in all other states except Rhode Island, due in part to its mild climate and its energy efficiency programs. • In 2021, California was the nation’s top producer of electricity from solar, geothermal, and biomass energy. The state was fourth in the nation in conventional hydroelectric power generation, down from second in 2019, in part because of drought and increased water demand.
• In 2021, California was the fourth-largest electricity producer in the nation, but the state was also the nation’s second-largest consumer of electricity, and in 2020, it received about 30% of its electricity supply from generating facilities outside of California, including imports from Mexico.

As indicated above, California is one of the nation’s leading energy‐producing states, and California’s per capita energy use is among the nation’s most efficient. Given the nature of the Project, the remainder of this discussion will focus on the three sources of energy that are most relevant to the Project—namely, electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel for vehicle trips associated with the uses planned for the Project.

2.2 ELECTRICITY
The usage associated with electricity use were calculated using CalEEMod Version 2022.1. The Southern California region’s electricity reliability has been of concern for the past several years due to the planned retirement of aging facilities that depend upon once-through cooling technologies, as well as the June 2013 retirement of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (San Onofre). While the once-through cooling phase-out has been ongoing since the May 2010 adoption of the State Water Resources Control Board’s once-through cooling policy, the retirement of San Onofre complicated the situation. California Independent Service Operator (ISO) studies revealed the extent to which the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) region were vulnerable to low-voltage and post-transient voltage instability concerns. A preliminary plan to address these issues was detailed in the 2013 Integrative Energy Policy Report (IEPR) after a collaborative process with other energy agencies, utilities, and air districts (8). Similarly, the subsequent 2021 IEPR’s provides information and policy recommendations on advancing a clean, reliable, and affordable energy system.

California’s electricity industry is an organization of traditional utilities, private generating companies, and state agencies, each with a variety of roles and responsibilities to ensure that electrical power is provided to consumers. The California ISO is a nonprofit public benefit 1311
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
15 corporation and is the impartial operator of the State’s wholesale power grid and is charged with maintaining grid reliability, and to direct uninterrupted electrical energy supplies to California’s homes and communities. While utilities still own transmission assets, the ISO routes electrical power along these assets, maximizing the use of the transmission system and its power generation resources. The ISO matches buyers and sellers of electricity to ensure that enough power is available to meet demand. To these ends, every five minutes the ISO forecasts electrical demands, accounts for operating reserves, and assigns the lowest cost power plant unit to meet demands while ensuring adequate system transmission capacities and capabilities (9).

Part of the ISO’s charge is to plan and coordinate grid enhancements to ensure that electrical power is provided to California consumers. To this end, utilities file annual transmission expansion/modification plans to accommodate the State’s growing electrical needs. The ISO reviews and either approves or denies the proposed additions. In addition, and perhaps most importantly, the ISO works with other areas in the western United States electrical grid to ensure that adequate power supplies are available to the State. In this manner, continuing reliable and affordable electrical power is assured to existing and new consumers throughout the State.

Electricity is currently provided to the Project site by Southern California Edison (SCE). SCE provides electric power to more than 15 million persons in 15 counties and in 180 incorporated cities, within a service area encompassing approximately 50,000 square miles. Based on SCE’s 2018 Power Content Label Mix, SCE derives electricity from varied energy resources including:
fossil fuels, hydroelectric generators, nuclear power plants, geothermal power plants, solar power generation, and wind farms. SCE also purchases from independent power producers and utilities, including out‐of‐state suppliers (10).

Table 2-2, SCE’s specific proportional shares of electricity sources in 2020. As indicated in Table 2-2, the 2020 SCE Power Mix has renewable energy at 30.9% of the overall energy resources.

Geothermal resources are at 5.5%, wind power is at 9.4%, large hydroelectric sources are at 3.3%, solar energy is at 15.1%, and coal is at 0% (11).
1312
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
16 TABLE 2-2: SCE 2020 POWER CONTENT MIX
Energy Resources 2020 SCE Power Mix
Eligible Renewable 30.9%
Biomass & Waste 0.1%
Geothermal 5.5%
Eligible Hydroelectric 0.8%
Solar 15.1%
Wind 9.4%
Coal 0.0%
Large Hydroelectric 3.3%
Natural Gas 15.2%
Nuclear 8.4%
Other 0.3%
Unspecified Sources of power* 42.0%
Total 100%
* "Unspecified sources of power" means electricity from transactions that are not traceable to specific generation sources

2.3 NATURAL GAS
The following summary of natural gas customers and volumes, supplies, delivery of supplies, storage, service options, and operations is excerpted from information provided by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).
“The CPUC regulates natural gas utility service for approximately 10.8 million customers that receive natural gas from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Gas (SoCalGas), San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E), Southwest Gas, and several smaller natural gas utilities. The CPUC also regulates independent storage operators: Lodi Gas Storage, Wild Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage and Gill Ranch Storage.

California's natural gas utilities provide service to over 11 million gas meters. SoCalGas and PG&E provide service to about 5.9 million and 4.3 million customers, respectively, while SDG&E provides service to over 800, 000 customers. In 2018, California gas utilities forecasted that they would deliver about 4740 million cubic feet per day (MMcfd) of gas to their customers, on average, under normal weather conditions.

The overwhelming majority of natural gas utility customers in California are residential and small commercials customers, referred to as "core" customers. Larger volume gas customers, like electric generators and industrial customers, are called "noncore" customers. Although very small in number relative to core customers, noncore customers consume about 65% of the natural gas delivered by the state's natural gas utilities, while core customers consume about 35%.
1313
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
17 A significant amount of gas (about 19%, or 1131 MMcfd, of the total forecasted California consumption in 2018) is also directly delivered to some California large volume consumers, without being transported over the regulated utility pipeline system. Those customers, referred to as "bypass" customers, take service directly from interstate pipelines or directly from California producers.

SDG&E and Southwest Gas' southern division are wholesale customers of SoCalGas, i.e., they receive deliveries of gas from SoCalGas and in turn deliver that gas to their own customers. (Southwest Gas also provides natural gas distribution service in the Lake Tahoe area.) Similarly, West Coast Gas, a small gas utility, is a wholesale customer of PG&E. Some other wholesale customers are municipalities like the cities of Palo Alto, Long Beach, and Vernon, which are not regulated by the CPUC.

Natural gas from out-of-state production basins is delivered into California via the interstate natural gas pipeline system. The major interstate pipelines that deliver out-ofstate natural gas to California gas utilities are Gas Transmission Northwest Pipeline, Kern River Pipeline, Transwestern Pipeline, El Paso Pipeline, Ruby Pipeline, Mojave Pipeline, and Tuscarora. Another pipeline, the North Baja - Baja Norte Pipeline takes gas off the El Paso Pipeline at the California/Arizona border and delivers that gas through California into Mexico. While the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) regulates the transportation of natural gas on the interstate pipelines, and authorizes rates for that service, the California Public Utilities Commission may participate in FERC regulatory proceedings to represent the interests of California natural gas consumers.

The gas transported to California gas utilities via the interstate pipelines, as well as some of the California-produced gas, is delivered into the PG&E and SoCalGas intrastate natural gas transmission pipelines systems (commonly referred to as California's "backbone" pipeline system). Natural gas on the utilities' backbone pipeline systems is then delivered to the local transmission and distribution pipeline systems, or to natural gas storage fields. Some large volume noncore customers take natural gas delivery directly off the high-pressure backbone and local transmission pipeline systems, while core customers and other noncore customers take delivery off the utilities' distribution pipeline systems. The state's natural gas utilities operate over 100,000 miles of transmission and distribution pipelines, and thousands more miles of service lines.

Bypass customers take most of their deliveries directly off the Kern/Mojave pipeline system, but they also take a significant amount of gas from California production.

PG&E and SoCalGas own and operate several natural gas storage fields that are located within their service territories in northern and southern California, respectively. These storage fields, and four independently owned storage utilities - Lodi Gas Storage, Wild Goose Storage, Central Valley Storage, and Gill Ranch Storage - help meet peak seasonal and daily natural gas demand and allow California natural gas customers to secure natural gas supplies more efficiently. PG&E is a 25% owner of the Gill Ranch Storage field.

These storage fields provide a significant amount of infrastructure capacity to help meet 1314
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
18 California's natural gas requirements, and without these storage fields, California would need much more pipeline capacity in order to meet peak gas requirements .

Prior to the late 1980s, California regulated utilities provided virtually all natural gas services to all their customers. Since then, the Commission has gradually restructured the California gas industry in order to give customers more options while assuring regulatory protections for those customers that wish to, or are required to, continue receiving utilityprovided services.

The option to purchase natural gas from independent suppliers is one of the results of this restructuring process. Although the regulated utilities procure natural gas supplies for most core customers, core customers have the option to purchase natural gas from independent natural gas marketers, called "core transport agents" (CTA). Contact information for core transport agents can be found on the utilities' web sites. Noncore customers, on the other hand, make natural gas supply arrangements directly with producers or with marketers.

Another option resulting from the restructuring process occurred in 1993, when the Commission removed the utilities' storage service responsibility for noncore customers, along with the cost of this service from noncore customers' transportation rates. The Commission also encouraged the development of independent storage fields, and in subsequent years, all the independent storage fields in California were established. Noncore customers and marketers may now take storage service from the utility or from an independent storage provider (if available), and pay for that service, or may opt to take no storage service at all. For core customers, the Commission assures that the utility has adequate storage capacity set aside to meet core requirements, and core customers pay for that service.

In a 1997 decision, the Commission adopted PG&E's "Gas Accord", which unbundled PG&E's backbone transmission costs from noncore transportation rates. This decision gave customers and marketers the opportunity to obtain pipeline capacity rights on PG&E's backbone transmission pipeline system, if desired, and pay for that service at rates authorized by the Commission. The Gas Accord also required PG&E to set aside a certain amount of backbone transmission capacity in order to deliver gas to its core customers. Subsequent Commission decisions modified and extended the initial terms of the Gas Accord. The "Gas Accord" framework is still in place today for PG&E's backbone and storage rates and services and is now simply referred to as PG&E Gas Transmission and Storage (GT&S).

In a 2006 decision, the Commission adopted a similar gas transmission framework for Southern California, called the "firm access rights" system. SoCalGas and SDG&E implemented the firm access rights (FAR) system in 2008, and it is now referred to as the backbone transmission system (BTS) framework. As under the PG&E backbone transmission system, SoCalGas backbone transmission costs are unbundled from noncore transportation rates. Noncore customers and marketers may obtain, and pay for, firm backbone transmission capacity at various receipt points on the SoCalGas system. A 1315
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
19 certain amount of backbone transmission capacity is obtained for core customers to assure meeting their requirements.

Many if not most noncore customers now use a marketer to provide for several of the services formerly provided by the utility. That is, a noncore customer may simply arrange for a marketer to procure its supplies, and obtain any needed storage and backbone transmission capacity, in order to assure that it will receive its needed deliveries of natural gas supplies. Core customers still mainly rely on the utilities for procurement service, but they have the option to take procurement service from a CTA. Backbone transmission and storage capacity is either set aside or obtained for core customers in amounts to assure very high levels of service.

In order properly operate their natural gas transmission pipeline and storage systems, PG&E and SoCalGas must balance the amount of gas received into the pipeline system and delivered to customers or to storage fields. Some of these utilities’ storage capacity is dedicated to this service, and under most circumstances, customers do not need to precisely match their deliveries with their consumption. However, when too much or too little gas is expected to be delivered into the utilities’ systems, relative to the amount being consumed, the utilities require customers to more precisely match up their deliveries with their consumption. And, if customers do not meet certain delivery requirements, they could face financial penalties. The utilities do not profit from these financial penalties - the amounts are then returned to customers as a whole. If the utilities find that they are unable to deliver all the gas that is expected to be consumed, they may even call for a curtailment of some gas deliveries. These curtailments are typically required for just the largest, noncore customers. It has been many years since there has been a significant curtailment of core customers in California.” (12)
As indicated in the preceding discussions, natural gas is available from a variety of in‐state and out‐of‐state sources and is provided throughout the state in response to market supply and demand. Complementing available natural gas resources, biogas may soon be available via existing delivery systems, thereby increasing the availability and reliability of resources in total.

The CPUC oversees utility purchases and transmission of natural gas to ensure reliable and affordable natural gas deliveries to existing and new consumers throughout the State.

2.4 TRANSPORTATION ENERGY RESOURCES
The Project would generate additional vehicle trips with resulting consumption of energy resources, predominantly gasoline and diesel fuel. The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) identified 36.2 million registered vehicles in California (13), and those vehicles consume an estimated 17.2 billion gallons of fuel each year1. Gasoline (and other vehicle fuels) are commercially provided commodities and would be available to the Project patrons and employees via commercial outlets.
1 Fuel consumptions estimated utilizing information from EMFAC2021. 1316
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
20 California’s on-road transportation system includes 396,616 lane miles, more than 26.6 million passenger vehicles and light trucks, and almost 9.0 million medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (13).

While gasoline consumption has been declining since 2008 it is still by far the dominant fuel.

California is the second-largest consumer of petroleum products, after Texas, and accounts for 10% of the nation's total consumption. The state is the largest U.S. consumer of motor gasoline and jet fuel, and 85% of the petroleum consumed in California is used in the transportation sector (14).

California accounts for less than 1% of total U.S. natural gas reserves and production. As with crude oil, California's natural gas production has experienced a gradual decline since 1985. In 2019, about 37% of the natural gas delivered to consumers went to the state's industrial sector, and about 28% was delivered to the electric power sector. Natural gas fueled more than twofifths of the state's utility-scale electricity generation in 2019. The residential sector, where twothirds of California households use natural gas for home heating, accounted for 22% of natural gas deliveries. The commercial sector received 12% of the deliveries to end users and the transportation sector consumed the remaining 1% (14).
1317
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
21 This page intentionally left blank
1318
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
22 3 REGULATORY BACKGROUND
Federal and state agencies regulate energy use and consumption through various means and programs. On the federal level, the United States Department of Transportation, the United States Department of Energy, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are three federal agencies with substantial influence over energy policies and programs. On the state level, the CPUC and the CEC are two agencies with authority over different aspects of energy.

Relevant federal and state energy‐related laws and plans are summarized below.

3.1 FEDERAL REGULATIONS

3.1.1 INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT OF 1991 (ISTEA) ISTEA promoted the development of inter‐modal transportation systems to maximize mobility as well as address national and local interests in air quality and energy. ISTEA contained factors that Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) were to address in developing transportation plans and programs, including some energy‐related factors. To meet the new ISTEA requirements, MPOs adopted explicit policies defining the social, economic, energy, and environmental values guiding transportation decisions.

3.1.2 THE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY (TEA-21) TEA‐21 was signed into law in 1998 and builds upon the initiatives established in the ISTEA legislation, discussed above. TEA‐21 authorizes highway, highway safety, transit, and other efficient surface transportation programs. TEA‐21 continues the program structure established for highways and transit under ISTEA, such as flexibility in the use of funds, emphasis on measures to improve the environment, and focus on a strong planning process as the foundation of good transportation decisions. TEA‐21 also provides for investment in research and its application to maximize the performance of the transportation system through, for example, deployment of Intelligent Transportation Systems, to help improve operations and management of transportation systems and vehicle safety.

3.2 CALIFORNIA REGULATIONS

3.2.1 INTEGRATED ENERGY POLICY REPORT (IEPR)
Senate Bill 1389 (Bowen, Chapter 568, Statutes of 2002) requires the CEC to prepare a biennial integrated energy policy report that assesses major energy trends and issues facing the state’s electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel sectors and provides policy recommendations to conserve resources; protect the environment; ensure reliable, secure, and diverse energy supplies; enhance the state’s economy; and protect public health and safety (Public Resources Code § 25301[a]). The CEC prepares these assessments and associated policy recommendations every two years, with updates in alternate years, as part of the Integrated Energy Policy Report.

The 2021 IEPR was adopted February 2022, and continues to work towards improving electricity, natural gas, and transportation fuel energy use in California. The 2021 IEPR provides the results 1319
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
23 of the CEC’s assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these issues will require action if the state is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals while maintaining reliability and controlling costs. Additionally, the 2021 IEPR provides the results of the CEC’s assessments of a variety of energy issues facing California. Many of these issues will require action if the state is to meet its climate, energy, air quality, and other environmental goals while maintaining reliability and controlling costs (15).

3.2.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY PLAN
The CEC is responsible for preparing the State Energy Plan, which identifies emerging trends related to energy supply, demand, conservation, public health and safety, and the maintenance of a healthy economy. The Plan calls for the state to assist in the transformation of the transportation system to improve air quality, reduce congestion, and increase the efficient use of fuel supplies with the least environmental and energy costs. To further this policy, the plan identifies several strategies, including assistance to public agencies and fleet operators and encouragement of urban designs that reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and accommodate pedestrian and bicycle access.

3.2.3 CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 6, ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24 Part 6: The California Energy Code was first adopted in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California’s energy consumption.

The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficient technologies and methods. CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on August 1, 2009, and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission.

CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2022 California Green Building Code Standards that will be effective on January 1, 20232. The Project would be required to comply with the applicable standards in place at the time plan check submittals are made (16).

3.2.4 AB 1493 PAVLEY REGULATIONS AND FUEL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS California AB 1493, enacted on July 22, 2002, required CARB to develop and adopt regulations that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. Under this legislation, CARB adopted regulations to reduce GHG emissions from non-commercial passenger vehicles (cars and light-duty trucks). Although aimed at reducing GHG emissions, specifically, a co-benefit of the Pavley standards is an improvement in fuel efficiency and consequently a reduction in fuel consumption.
2 The 2022 California Green Building Standard Code will be published July 1, 2022. 1320
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
24 3.2.5 CALIFORNIA’S RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD (RPS) First established in 2002 under Senate Bill (SB) 1078, California’s Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) requires retail sellers of electric services to increase procurement from eligible renewable resources to 33% of total retail sales by 2020 (17).

3.2.6 CLEAN ENERGY AND POLLUTION REDUCTION ACT OF 2015 (SB 350) In October 2015, the legislature approved, and the Governor signed SB 350, which reaffirms California’s commitment to reducing its GHG emissions and addressing climate change. Key provisions include an increase in the renewables portfolio standard (RPS), higher energy efficiency requirements for buildings, initial strategies towards a regional electricity grid, and improved infrastructure for electric vehicle charging stations. Specifically, SB 350 requires the following to reduce statewide GHG emissions:
• Increase the amount of electricity procured from renewable energy sources from 33% to 50% by 2030, with interim targets of 40% by 2024, and 25% by 2027. • Double the energy efficiency in existing buildings by 2030. This target will be achieved through the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC), the CEC, and local publicly owned utilities. • Reorganize the Independent System Operator (ISO) to develop more regional electrify transmission markets and to improve accessibility in these markets, which will facilitate the growth of renewable energy markets in the western United States (California Leginfo 2015).

3.2.7 CITY OF ONTARIO COMMUNITY CLIMATE ACTION PLAN (CCAP) The CCAP contains further guidance on the City of Ontario’s GHG Inventory reduction goals, policies, guidelines, and implementation programs. The purpose of the CCAP is to provide guidance on how to analyze GHG emissions and determine significance during the CEQA review of proposed development projects within the City of Ontario (18). The CCAP builds upon the Reduction Plan to address City-specific information and City-specific GHG reduction measures.

To address the state’s requirement to reduce GHG emissions, the CCAP was prepared with the goal of reducing GHG emissions within the City by 15% below 2008 levels by the year 2020. The City’s target is consistent with the AB 32 target and ensures that the City of Ontario achieves GHG reductions locally that complement and are consistent with state efforts to reduce GHG emissions.

As part of the CCAP, the City of Ontario published a guidance document titled “Greenhouse Gas Emissions, CEQA Thresholds and Screening Tables” (December 2014). As part of this guidance, the CCAP determined that if GHG emissions of a given project exceeds 3,000 MTCO2e/yr, then project emissions would need to be reduced by 25% when compared to year 2008 emissions levels. Alternatively, the project would need to achieve a minimum of 100 points pursuant to measures identified in the Screening Tables.

The update to the Ontario Plan includes an update to the City’s Community Climate Action Plan (CCAP) which was originally adopted on December 16, 2014. As stated in The Ontario Plan 2050 Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR), the measures included in the 2022 1321
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
25 update to the CCAP are not substantially different than that of the 2014 CCAP and therefore there is no change in the environmental impacts associated with the CCAP (19). 1322
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
26 This page intentionally left blank
1323
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
27 4 EXISTING PROJECT SITE ENERGY DEMANDS

4.1 EXISTING OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS

4.1.1 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS
The Project site is currently occupied and operating as a grain processing company and a corn storage and distribution facility. The estimated transportation energy demands from the existing development are summarized on Table 5-1.

TABLE 5-1: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION (ALL VEHICLES) Vehicle Type Annual VMT Estimated Annual Fuel
Consumption (gallons)
EXISTING (ALL VEHICLES) 1,426,059 134,254

4.1.2 EXISTING FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS
The estimated facility energy demands from the existing development are summarized on Table 5-2 and based on historic utility bills for the existing facility.

TABLE 5-2: EXISTING ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY Land Use Natural Gas Demand
(kBTU/year)
Electricity Demand
(kWh/year)
TOTAL EXISTING ENERGY DEMAND 794,266 1,027,373
kBTU – kilo-British Thermal Units
1324
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
28 This page intentionally left blank
1325
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
29 5 PROJECT ENERGY DEMANDS AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY MEASURES

5.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines (20), states that the means of achieving the goal of energy conservation includes the following:
• Decreasing overall per capita energy consumption;
• Decreasing reliance on fossil fuels such as coal, natural gas, and oil; and • Increasing reliance on renewable energy sources.

In compliance with Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines (21), this report analyzes the Project’s anticipated energy use during construction and operations to determine if the Project would:
• Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation; or • Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency

5.2 METHODOLOGY
Information from the CalEEMod Version 2022.1 outputs for the 5355 East Airport Drive Air Quality Impact Analysis (AQIA) (22) was utilized in this analysis, detailing Project related construction equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy demands.

5.2.1 CALEEMOD
In May 2022, the SCAQMD, in conjunction with the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) and other California air districts, released the latest version of the CalEEMod Version 2022.1. The purpose of this model is to calculate construction-source and operational-source criteria pollutants and GHG emissions from direct and indirect sources as well as energy usage (23). Accordingly, the latest version of CalEEMod has been used to determine the proposed Project’s anticipated transportation and facility energy demands. Outputsfrom the annual model runs are provided in Appendices 5.1 through 5.2.

5.2.2 EMISSION FACTORS MODEL
On May 2, 2022, the EPA approved the 2021 version of the EMissions FACtor model (EMFAC2021) web database for use in State Implementation Plan and transportation conformity analyses.

EMFAC2021 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel consumption, VMT from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by the CARB to project changes in future emissions from onroad mobile sources (24). This energy study utilizes the different fuel types for each vehicle class from the annual EMFAC2021 emission inventory in order to derive the average vehicle fuel economy which is then used to determine the estimated annual fuel consumption associated with vehicle usage during Project construction and operational activities. For purposes of 1326
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
30 analysis, the 2023 and 2024 analysis years were utilized to determine the average vehicle fuel economy used throughout the duration of the Project. Outputs from the EMFAC2021 model run is provided in Appendix 5.3.

5.3 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS
The focus within this section is the energy implications of the construction process, specifically the power cost from on-site electricity consumption during construction of the proposed Project.

5.3.1 CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
The total Project construction power costs is the summation of the products of the area (sf) by the construction duration and the typical power cost.

CONSTRUCTION DURATION
For purposes of analysis, construction of Project is expected to commence in May 2023 and would last through April 2024 (22). The construction schedule utilized in the analysis, shown in Table 5-1, represents a “worst-case” analysis scenario. The duration of construction activity and associated equipment represents a reasonable approximation of the expected construction fleet as required per CEQA Guidelines (25).

TABLE 5-1: CONSTRUCTION DURATION
Construction Activity Start Date End Date Days
Demolition/Crushing 05/02/2023 07/24/2023 60
Site Preparation 07/25/2023 09/04/2023 30
Grading 07/25/2023 09/04/2023 30
Building Construction 09/05/2023 04/15/2024 160
Paving 02/13/2024 04/15/2024 45
Architectural Coating/Landscaping 03/05/2024 04/15/2024 30

PROJECT CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
The 2022 National Construction Estimator identifies a typical power cost per 1,000 sf of construction per month of $2.41, which was used to calculate the Project’s total construction power cost (26).

As shown on Table 5-2, the total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the construction of the Project is estimated to be approximately $15,109.48. 1327
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
31 TABLE 5-2: CONSTRUCTION POWER COST
Land Use
Power Cost
(per 1,000 SF of
construction per
month)
Size
(1,000 SF)
Construction
Duration
(months)
Project
Construction
Power Cost
Warehousing $2.41 243.303 11 $6,449.97
High-Cube Cold Storage $2.41 27.034 11 $716.66
Landscape $2.41 72.527 11 $1,922.69
Parking $2.41 66.582 11 $1,765.09
Other Asphalt Surfaces $2.41 160.508 11 $4,255.07
CONSTRUCTION POWER COST $15,109.48

5.3.2 CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
The total Project construction electricity usage is the summation of the products of the power cost (estimated in Table 5-2) by the utility provider cost per kilowatt hour (kWh) of electricity.

PROJECT CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
The SCE’s general service rate schedule were used to determine the Project’s electrical usage. As of June 1, 2022, SCE’s general service rate is $0.13 per kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity for industrial services (27). As shown on Table 5-3, the total electricity usage from on-site Project construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 113,853 kWh.

TABLE 5-3: CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE
Land Use Cost per kWh Project Construction
Electricity Usage (kWh)
Warehousing $0.13 48,602
High-Cube Cold Storage $0.13 5,400
Landscape $0.13 14,488
Parking $0.13 13,300
Other Asphalt Surfaces $0.13 32,063
CONSTRUCTION ELECTRICITY USAGE 113,853

5.3.3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL ESTIMATES
Fuel consumed by construction equipment would be the primary energy resource expended over the course of Project construction.

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
Consistent with industry standards and typical construction practices, each piece of equipment listed in Table 5-4 will operate up to a total of eight (8) hours per day, or more than two-thirds of the period during which construction activities are allowed. 1328
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
32 TABLE 5-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT ASSUMPTIONS
Construction Activity Equipment Amount Hours Per Day
Demolition/Crushing
Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8
Excavators 3 8
Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8
Crushing/Proc. Equipment1 1 8
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8
Crawler Tractors 4 8
Grading
Graders 1 8
Excavators 2 8
Scrapers 2 8
Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8
Crawler Tractors 2 8
Building Construction
Forklifts 5 8
Generator Sets 2 8
Cranes 2 8
Welders 2 8
Crawler Tractors 5 8
Pavers
Pavers 2 8
Paving Equipment 2 8
Rollers 2 8
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 8
1 The Project will use an electric-powered crusher which will be powered by a diesel generator. As a conservative measure, this analysis models a single diesel-powered generator set.

PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION
Project construction activity timeline estimates, construction equipment schedules, equipment power ratings, load factors, and associated fuel consumption estimates are presented in Table 5-

5. The aggregate fuel consumption rate for all equipment is estimated at 18.5 horsepower hour per gallon (hp‐hr‐gal.), obtained from CARB 2018 Emissions Factors Tables and cited fuel consumption rate factors presented in Table D‐24 of the Moyer guidelines (28). For the purposes of this analysis, the calculations are based on all construction equipment being diesel‐powered, which is consistent with industry standards.
1329
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
33 TABLE 5-5: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES Construction Activity Duration
(Days) Equipment HP Rating Quantity Usage Hours
Load
Factor
HPhrs/dayTotal Fuel
Consumption
Demolition 60
Crushing/Proc. Equipment 14 1 8 0.74 83 269
Rubber Tired Dozers 367 2 8 0.40 2,349 7,618
Excavators 36 3 8 0.38 328 1,065
Concrete/Industrial Saws 33 1 8 0.73 193 625
Site Preparation 30
Crawler Tractors 87 4 8 0.43 1,197 1,941
Rubber Tired Dozers 367 3 8 0.40 3,523 5,713
Grading 30
Crawler Tractors 87 2 8 0.43 599 971
Graders 148 1 8 0.41 485 787
Excavators 36 2 8 0.38 219 355
Scrapers 423 2 8 0.48 3,249 5,268
Rubber Tired Dozers 367 1 8 0.40 1,174 1,904
Building Construction 160
Crawler Tractors 87 5 8 0.43 1,496 12,942
Forklifts 82 5 8 0.20 656 5,674
Generator Sets 14 2 8 0.74 166 1,434
Cranes 367 2 8 0.29 1,703 14,728
Welders 46 2 8 0.45 331 2,864
Paving 45
Pavers 81 2 8 0.42 544 1,324
Paving Equipment 89 2 8 0.36 513 1,247
Rollers 36 2 8 0.38 219 532
Architectural Coating 30 Air Compressors 37 1 8 0.48 142 230 CONSTRUCTION FUEL DEMAND (GALLONS DIESEL FUEL) 67,491
1330
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
34 Diesel fuel would be supplied by existing commercial fuel providers serving the Project area and region3. As previously presented in Table 4‐5, Project construction activities would consume an estimated 67,491 gallons of diesel fuel. Project construction would represent a “single‐event” diesel fuel demand and would not require ongoing or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose.

5.3.4 CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT
Construction generates on-road vehicle emissions from vehicle usage for workers, vendors, and haul truck commuting to and from the site. The number of workers and vendor trips are presented below in Table 5-6. It should be noted that for vendor trips, specifically, CalEEMod only assigns vendor trips to the Building Construction phase. Vendor trips would likely occur during all phases of construction. As such, the CalEEMod defaults for vendor trips have been adjusted based on a ratio of the total vendor trips to the number of days of each subphase of activity.

TABLE 5-6: CONSTRUCTION TRIPS AND VMT
Construction Activity Worker Trips
Per Day
Vendor Trips
Per Day
Hauling Trips
Per Day
Demolition/Crushing 18 10 3
Site Preparation 18 5 0
Grading 20 5 38
Building Construction 114 25 0
Paving 15 0 0
Architectural Coating/Landscaping 23 0 0

5.3.5 CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL ESTIMATES
With respect to estimated VMT for the Project, the construction worker trips (personal vehicles used by workers commuting to the Project from home) would generate an estimated 409,775 VMT during the 11 months of construction (22). Based on CalEEMod methodology, it is assumed that 50% of all construction worker trips are from light-duty-auto vehicles (LDA), 25% are from light-duty-trucks (LDT14), and 25% are from light-duty-trucks (LDT25). Data regarding Project related construction worker trips were based on CalEEMod defaults utilized within the AQIA.

Vehicle fuel efficiencies for LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 were estimated using information generated within the 2021 version of the EMFAC developed by CARB. EMFAC2021 is a mathematical model that was developed to calculate emission rates, fuel consumption, and VMT from motor vehicles that operate on highways, freeways, and local roads in California and is commonly used by the CARB to project changes in future emissions from on-road mobile sources (24). EMFAC2021 was 3 Based on Appendix A of the CalEEMod User’s Guide, Construction consists of several types of off-road equipment. Since the majority of the off-road construction equipment used for construction projects are diesel fueled, CalEEMod assumes all of the equipment operates on diesel fuel.
4 Vehicles under the LDT1 category have a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of less than 6,000 lbs. and equivalent test weight (ETW) of less than or equal to 3,750 lbs.
5 Vehicles under the LDT2 category have a GVWR of less than 6,000 lbs. and ETW between 3,751 lbs. and 5,750 lbs. 1331
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
35 run for the LDA, LDT1, and LDT2 vehicle class within the California sub-area for the 2023 and 2024 calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 5.3.

TABLE 5-7: CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES Year Construction Activity Duration
(Days)
Worker
Trips/Day
Trip
Length
(miles)
VMT
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
2023
LDA
Demolition/Crushing 60 9 18.5 9,990 30.68 326
Site Preparation 30 9 18.5 4,995 30.68 163
Grading 30 10 18.5 5,550 30.68 181
Building Construction 84 57 18.5 88,578 30.68 2,887
LDT1
Demolition/Crushing 60 5 18.5 5,550 24.14 230
Site Preparation 30 5 18.5 2,775 24.14 115
Grading 30 5 18.5 2,775 24.14 115
Building Construction 84 29 18.5 45,066 24.14 1,867
LDT2
Demolition/Crushing 60 5 18.5 5,550 23.82 233
Site Preparation 30 5 18.5 2,775 23.82 117
Grading 30 5 18.5 2,775 23.82 117
Building Construction 84 29 18.5 45,066 23.82 1,892
2024
LDA
Building Construction 76 57 18.5 80,142 31.57 2,538
Paving 45 8 18.5 6,660 31.57 211
Architectural Coating 30 12 18.5 6,660 31.57 211
LDT1
Building Construction 76 29 18.5 40,774 24.59 1,658
Paving 45 4 18.5 3,330 24.59 135
Architectural Coating 30 6 18.5 3,330 24.59 135
LDT2
Building Construction 76 29 18.5 40,774 24.51 1,664
Paving 45 4 18.5 3,330 24.51 136
Architectural Coating 30 6 18.5 3,330 24.51 136
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION WORKER FUEL CONSUMPTION 15,066
1332
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
36 As previously shown in Table 4‐7, the estimated annual fuel consumption resulting from Project construction worker trips is 15,066 gallons during full construction of the Project. It should be noted that construction worker trips would represent a “single‐event” gasoline fuel demand and would not require ongoing or permanent commitment of fuel resources for this purpose.

5.3.6 CONSTRUCTION VENDOR/HAULING FUEL ESTIMATES
With respect to estimated VMT, the construction vendor trips (vehicles that deliver materials to the site during construction) would generate an estimated 78,624 VMT along area roadways for the Project over the duration of construction activity (22). It is assumed that 50% of all vendor trips are from medium-heavy duty trucks (MHD), 50% of all vendor trips are from heavy-heavy duty trucks (HHD), and 100% of all hauling trips are HHDs. These assumptions are consistent with the CalEEMod defaults utilized within the within the AQIA (22). Vehicle fuel efficiencies for MHDs and HHDs were estimated using information generated within EMFAC2021. EMFAC2021 was run for the MHD and HHD vehicle classes within the California sub-area for the 2023 and 2024 calendar years. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 5.3.

TABLE 5-8: CONSTRUCTION VENDOR FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES Year Construction Activity Duration
(Days)
Vendor/
Hauling
Trips/Day
Trip
Length
(miles)
VMT
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
2023
MHD
Demolition/Crushing 60 5 10.2 3,060 8.27 370
Site Preparation 30 3 10.2 918 8.27 111
Grading 30 3 10.2 918 8.27 111
Building Construction 84 13 10.2 11,138 8.27 1,347
HHD (Vendor)
Demolition/Crushing 60 5 10.2 3,060 5.94 515
Site Preparation 30 3 10.2 918 5.94 155
Grading 30 3 10.2 918 5.94 155
Building Construction 84 13 10.2 11,138 5.94 1,875
HHD (Hauling)
Demolition/Crushing 60 3 20 3,600 5.94 606
Grading 30 38 20 22,800 5.94 3,838
2023
MHD
Building Construction 76 13 10.2 10,078 8.32 1,212
HHD (Vendor)
Building Construction 76 13 10.2 10,078 6.03 1,673
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION VENDOR/HAULING FUEL CONSUMPTION 11,965 1333
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
37 Based on Table 5-8, it is estimated that 11,965 gallons of fuel will be consumed related to construction vendor trips during full construction of the Project. It should be noted that Project construction vendor trips would represent a “single‐event” diesel fuel demand and would not require on‐going or permanent commitment of diesel fuel resources for this purpose.

5.3.7 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES Starting in 2014, CARB adopted the nation's first regulation aimed at cleaning up off-road construction equipment such as bulldozers, graders, and backhoes. These requirements ensure fleets gradually turnover the oldest and dirtiest equipment to newer, cleaner models and prevent fleets from adding older, dirtier equipment. As such, the equipment used for Project construction would conform to CARB regulations and California emissions standards. It should also be noted that there are no unusual Project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities; or equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies). Equipment employed in construction of the Project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of fuel.

Construction contractors would be required to comply with applicable CARB regulation regarding retrofitting, repowering, or replacement of diesel off-road construction equipment. Additionally, CARB has adopted the Airborne Toxic Control Measure to limit heavy-duty diesel motor vehicle idling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel particulate matter and other Toxic Air Contaminants. Compliance with anti-idling and emissions regulations would result in a more efficient use of construction-related energy and the minimization or elimination of wasteful or unnecessary consumption of energy. Idling restrictions and the use of newer engines and equipment would result in less fuel combustion and energy consumption.

Additional construction‐source energy efficiencies would occur due to required California regulations and best available control measures (BACM). For example, CCR Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than five minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. Section 2449(d)(3) requires that grading plans shall reference the requirement that a sign shall be posted on‐site stating that construction workers need to shut off engines at or before five minutes of idling.” In this manner, construction equipment operators are required to be informed that engines are to be turned off at or prior to five minutes of idling. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through periodic site inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen complaints.

A full analysis related to the energy needed to form construction materials is not included in this analysis due to a lack of detailed Project-specific information on construction materials. At this time, an analysis of the energy needed to create Project-related construction materials would be extremely speculative and thus has not been prepared.

In general, construction processes promote conservation and efficient use of energy by reducing raw materials demands, with related reduction in energy demands associated with raw materials extraction, transportation, processing, and refinement. Use of materials in bulk reduces energy 1334
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
38 demands associated with preparation and transport of construction materials as well as the transport and disposal of construction waste and solid waste in general, with corollary reduced demands on area landfill capacities and energy consumed by waste transport and landfill operations.

5.4 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS
Energy consumption in support of or related to Project operations would include transportation fuel demands (fuel consumed by passenger car and truck vehicles accessing the Project site), fuel demands from operational equipment, and facilities energy demands (energy consumed by building operations and site maintenance activities).

5.4.1 TRANSPORTATION FUELDEMANDS
Energy that would be consumed by Project‐generated traffic is a function of total VMT and estimated vehicle fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site. The VMT per vehicle class can be determined by evaluated in the vehicle fleet mix and the total VMT. As with worker and vendors trips, operational vehicle fuel efficiencies were estimated using information generated within EMFAC2021 developed by CARB (24). EMFAC2021 was run for the San Bernardino County area for the 2024 calendar year. Data from EMFAC2021 is shown in Appendix 5.3.

In order to account for the possibility of refrigerated uses (cold storage), it is assumed that all trucks accessing this land use are presumed to also have transport refrigeration units (TRUs).

Therefore, for modeling purposes 11 trucks are assumed to be trucks with TRUs. TRUs are also accounted for during on-site and off-site travel. The TRU calculations are based on EMFAC2021.

The estimated transportation energy demands are summarized on Table 5-9. It should be noted that the existing development demands were subtracted from the Project demandsto determine the net transportation energy demands from the proposed Project. As summarized on Table 5- 10 the Project would result in a net increase of 638,365 annual VMT and an estimated annual fuel consumption of 45,152 gallons of fuel.
1335
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
39 TABLE 5-9: TOTAL PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ANNUAL FUEL CONSUMPTION Vehicle Type Average Vehicle Fuel
Economy (mpg) Annual VMT Estimated Annual Fuel Consumption (gallons) LDA 31.57 664,379 21,042
LDT1 24.59 55,178 2,244
LDT2 24.51 264,546 10,795
MDV 14.97 173,686 11,604
MCY 14.97 23,749 1,587
LHD1 15.81 131,551 8,319
LHD2 14.97 35,486 2,371
MHD 8.32 168,801 20,298
HHD 6.03 547,048 90,792
TRUs 10,354
TOTAL (ALL VEHICLES) 2,064,424 179,406
EXISTING (ALL VEHICLES) 1,426,059 134,254
NET (PROPOSED – EXISTING) 638,365 45,152

5.4.2 ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT FUEL DEMANDS
It is common for industrial buildings to require the operation of exterior cargo handling equipment in the building’s truck court areas. For this particular Project, on-site modeled operational equipment includes up to one (1) 175 horsepower (hp), natural gas-powered cargo handling equipment – port tractors operating at 4 hours a day6for 365 days of the year.

Project operational activity estimates and associated fuel consumption estimates are based on the annual EMFAC2021 offroad emissions for the 2024 operational year and was used to derive the total annual fuel consumption associated on-site equipment. As presented in Table 5-10, Project on-site equipment would consume an estimated 4,642 gallons of natural gas.

TABLE 5-10: ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT FUEL CONSUMPTION ESTIMATES Equipment Quantity Usage
Hours
Days of
Operation
EMFAC2021
Fuel
Consumption
(gal./yr)
EMFAC2021
Activity
(hrs./yr)
Total Fuel
Consumption
Cargo Handling Equipment 1 4 365 17,909 5,633 4,642
ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT FUEL DEMAND (GALLONS FUEL) 4,642 6 Based on Table II-3, Port and Rail Cargo Handling Equipment Demographics by Type, from CARB’s Technology Assessment: Mobile Cargo Handling Equipment document, a single piece of equipment could operate up to 2 hours per day (Total Average Annual Activity divided by Total Number Pieces of Equipment). As such, the analysis conservatively assumes that the tractor/loader/backhoe would operate up to 4 hours per day.
1336
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
40 5.4.3 FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS
Project building operations activities would result in the consumption of electricity and natural gas, which would be supplied to the Project by SCE and SoCalGas, respectively. Annual natural gas and electricity demands of the Project are summarized in Table 5-11. It should be noted that the existing development demands were subtracted from the Project demands to determine the net facility energy demands from the proposed Project. As summarized on Table 5-11 the Project would result in a net increase of 4,543,279 kBTU/year of natural gas and a net increase of 746,675 kWh/year of electricity.

TABLE 5-11: PROJECT ANNUAL OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMAND SUMMARY Land Use Natural Gas Demand
(kBTU/year)
Electricity Demand
(kWh/year)
Warehousing 4,625,355 1,123,744
High-Cube Cold Storage 712,190 591,921
Landscape 0 58,383
Parking 0 0
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0
TOTAL PROJECT ENERGY DEMAND 5,337,545 1,774,048
EXISTING ENERGY DEMAND 794,266 1,027,373
NET PROJECT ENERGY DEMAND 4,543,279 746,675

5.4.4 OPERATIONAL ENERGY EFFICIENCY/CONSERVATION MEASURES Energy efficiency/energy conservation attributes of the Project would be complemented by increasingly stringent state and federal regulatory actions addressing vehicle fuel economies and vehicle emissions standards; and enhanced building/utilities energy efficiencies mandated under California building codes (e.g., Title24, California Green Building Standards Code).

ENHANCED VEHICLE FUEL EFFICIENCIES
Project annual fuel consumption estimates presented previously in Table 5-9 represent likely potential maximums that would occur for the Project. Under subsequent future conditions, average fuel economies of vehicles accessing the Project site can be expected to improve as older, less fuel-efficient vehicles are removed from circulation, and in response to fuel economy and emissions standards imposed on newer vehicles entering the circulation system.

5.5.1 CONSTRUCTION ENERGY DEMANDS
The estimated power cost of on-site electricity usage during the construction of the Project is assumed to be approximately $15,109.48. Additionally, based on the assumed power cost, it is estimated that the total electricity usage during construction, after full Project buildout, is calculated to be approximately 113,853 kWh.

Construction equipment used by the Project would result in single event consumption of approximately 67,491 gallons of diesel fuel. Construction equipment use of fuel would not be atypical for the type of construction proposed because there are no aspects of the Project’s proposed construction process that are unusual or energy-intensive, and Project construction equipment would conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote equipment fuel efficiencies.

CCR Title 13, Title 13, Motor Vehicles, section 2449(d)(3) Idling, limits idling times of construction vehicles to no more than 5 minutes, thereby precluding unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to unproductive idling of construction equipment. BACMs inform construction equipment operators of this requirement. Enforcement of idling limitations is realized through periodic site inspections conducted by City building officials, and/or in response to citizen complaints.

Construction worker trips for full construction of the Project would result in the estimated fuel consumption of 15,066 gallons of fuel. Additionally, fuel consumption from construction vendor trips (MHDs and HHDs) will total approximately 11,965 gallons. Diesel fuel would be supplied by City and regional commercial vendors. Indirectly, construction energy efficiencies and energy conservation would be achieved using bulk purchases, transport and use of construction materials. The 2021 IEPR released by the CEC has shown that fuel efficiencies are getting better within on and off-road vehicle engines due to more stringent government requirements (15). As supported by the preceding discussions, Project construction energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

5.5.2 OPERATIONAL ENERGY DEMANDS

TRANSPORTATION ENERGY DEMANDS
Annual vehicular trips and related VMT generated by the operation of the Project would result in a fuel demand of 45,152 gallons of fuel.

Fuel would be provided by current and future commercial vendors. Trip generation and VMT generated by the Project are consistent with other industrial uses of similar scale and configuration, as reflected respectively in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Ed., 2021); and CalEEMod. As such, Project operations would not result in excessive and wasteful vehicle trips and VMT, nor excess and wasteful vehicle energy consumption compared to other industrial uses.
1338
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
42 It should be noted that the state strategy for the transportation sector for medium and heavyduty trucks is focused on making trucks more efficient and expediting truck turnover rather than reducing VMT from trucks. This is in contrast to the passenger vehicle component of the transportation sector where both per-capita VMT reductions and an increase in vehicle efficiency are forecasted to be needed to achieve the overall state emissions reductions goals.

Heavy duty trucks involved in goods movements are generally controlled on the technology side and through fleet turnover of older trucks and engines to newer and cleaner trucks and engines.

The first battery-electric heavy-heavy duty trucks are being tested this year and SCAQMD is looking to integrate this new technology into large-scale truck operations. The following state strategies reduce GHG emissions from the medium and heavy-duty trucks:
• CARB’s Mobile Source Strategy focuses on reducing GHGs through the transition to zero and low emission vehicles and from medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks. • CARB’s Sustainable Freight Action Plan establishes a goal to improve freight efficiency by 25% by 2030, deploy over 100,000 freight vehicles and equipment capable of zero emission operation and maximize both zero and near-zero emission freight vehicles and equipment powered by renewable energy by 2030.
• CARB’s Emissions Reduction Plan for Ports and Goods Movement (Goods Movement Plan) in California focuses on reducing heavy-duty truck-related emissions focus on establishment of emissions standards for trucks, fleet turnover, truck retrofits, and restriction on truck idling (CARB 2006). While the focus of Goods Movement Plan is to reduce criteria air pollutant and air toxic emissions, the strategies to reduce these pollutants would also generally have a beneficial effect in reducing GHG emissions.
• CARB’s On-Road Truck and Bus Regulation (2010) requires diesel trucks and buses that operate in California to be upgraded to reduce emissions. Newer heavier trucks and buses must meet particulate matter filter requirements beginning January 1, 2012. Lighter and older heavier trucks must be replaced starting January 1, 2015. By January 1, 2023, nearly all trucks and buses will need to have 2010 model year engines or equivalent (29). • CARB’s Heavy-Duty (Tractor-Trailer) GHG Regulation requires SmartWay tractor trailers that include idle-reduction technologies, aerodynamic technologies, and low-rolling resistant tires that would reduce fuel consumption and associated GHG emissions.

The proposed Project would implement project design features that would facilitate the accessibility, parking, and loading of trucks on-site.

Enhanced fuel economies realized pursuant to federal and state regulatory actions, and related transition of vehicles to alternative energy sources (e.g., electricity, natural gas, biofuels, hydrogen cells) would likely decrease future gasoline fuel demands per VMT. Location of the Project proximate to regional and local roadway systems tends to reduce VMT within the region, acting to reduce regional vehicle energy demands. The Project would implement sidewalks, facilitating and encouraging pedestrian access. Facilitating pedestrian and bicycle access would reduce VMT and associated energy consumption. In compliance with the California Green Building Standards Code and City requirements, the Project would promote the use of bicycles as an alternative mean of transportation by providing short-term and/or long-term bicycle 1339
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
43 parking accommodations. As supported by the preceding discussions, Project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

ON-SITE CARGO HANDLING EQUIPMENT FUEL DEMANDS
As previously stated, it is common for industrial buildings to require the operation of exterior cargo handling equipment in the building’s truck court areas. On-site cargo handling equipment used by the Project would result in approximately 4,642 gallons of natural gas. On-site equipment use of fuel would not be atypical for the type of construction proposed because there are no aspects of the Project’s proposed operations that are unusual or energy-intensive, and Project on-site equipment would conform to the applicable CARB emissions standards, acting to promote equipment fuel efficiencies.

FACILITY ENERGY DEMANDS
Project facility operational energy demands are estimated to be: 4,543,279 kBTU/year of natural gas and 746,675 kWh/year of electricity. Natural gas will be supplied to the Project by SoCalGas and electricity would be supplied by SCE. The Project proposes conventional industrial uses reflecting contemporary energy efficient/energy conserving designs and operational programs.

The Project does not propose uses that are inherently energy intensive and the energy demands in total would be comparable to other industrial uses of similar scale and configuration.

Lastly, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards. Compliance itself with applicable Title 24 standards will ensure that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.
1340
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
44 This page intentionally left blank
1341
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
45 6 CONCLUSIONS

6.1 ENERGY IMPACT 1
Would the Project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?
As supported by the preceding analyses, Project construction and operations would not result in the inefficient, wasteful, or unnecessary consumption of energy. The Project would therefore not cause or result in the need for additional energy producing or transmission facilities. The Project would not engage in wasteful or inefficient uses of energy and aims to achieve energy conservations goals within the State of California.

6.2 ENERGY IMPACT 2
Would the Project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?
The Project’s consistency with the applicable state and local plans is discussed below.

CONSISTENCY WITH ISTEA
Transportation and access to the Project site is provided by the local and regional roadway systems. The Project would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct intermodal transportation plans or projects that may be realized pursuant to the ISTEA because SCAG is not planning for intermodal facilities on or through the Project site.

CONSISTENCY WITH TEA-21
The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access, acts to reduce vehicle miles traveled, takes advantage of existing infrastructure systems, and promotes land use compatibilities through collocation of similar uses. The Project supports the strong planning processes emphasized under TEA‐21. The Project is therefore consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation of TEA‐21.

CONSISTENCY WITH IEPR
Electricity would be provided to the Project by SCE. SCE’s Clean Power and Electrification Pathway (CPEP) white paper builds on existing state programs and policies. As such, the Project is consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with, nor obstruct implementation the goals presented in the 2021 IEPR.

Additionally, the Project will comply with the applicable Title 24 standards which would ensure that the Project energy demands would not be inefficient, wasteful, or otherwise unnecessary.

As such, development of the proposed Project would support the goals presented in the 2020 IEPR.
1342
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
46 CONSISTENCY WITH STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENERGY PLAN
The Project site is located along major transportation corridors with proximate access to the Interstate freeway system. The site selected for the Project facilitates access and takes advantage of existing infrastructure systems. The Project therefore supports urban design and planning processes identified under the State of California Energy Plan, is consistent with, and would not otherwise interfere with or obstruct, implementation of the State of California Energy Plan.

CONSISTENCY WITH CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 6, ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS The 2022 version of Title 24 was adopted by the CEC and will become effective on January 1, 2023. As the Project building construction is anticipated in 2024, it is presumed that the Project would be required to comply with the Title 24 standards in place at that time. Therefore, the Project is would not result in a significant impact on energy resources (16). The proposed Project would be subject to Title 24 standards.

CONSISTENCY WITH CALIFORNIA CODE TITLE 24, PART 11, CALGREEN As previously stated, CCR, Title 24, Part 11: CALGreen is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on January 1, 2009, and is administered by the California Building Standards Commission. CALGreen is updated on a regular basis, with the most recent approved update consisting of the 2022 California Green Building Code Standards that were published on July 1, 2022 and will become effective on January 1, 2023. The Project would be required to comply with the applicable standards in place at the time plan check submittals are made.

CONSISTENCY WITH AB 1493
AB 1493 is not applicable to the Project as it is a statewide measure establishing vehicle emissions standards. No feature of the Project would interfere with implementation of the requirements under AB 1493.

CONSISTENCY WITH RPS
California’s RPS is not applicable to the Project as it is a statewide measure that establishes a renewable energy mix. No feature of the Project would interfere with implementation of the requirements under RPS.

CONSISTENCY WITH SB 350
The proposed Project would use energy from SCE, which have committed to diversify their portfolio of energy sources by increasing energy from wind and solar sources. No feature of the Project would interfere with implementation of SB 350. Additionally, the Project would be designed and constructed to implement the energy efficiency measures for new industrial developments and would include several measures designed to reduce energy consumption.

As shown above, the Project would not conflict with any of the state or local plans. As such, a less than significant impact is expected.
1343
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
47 CONSISTENCY WITH CCAP
The Project would comply with applicable CAP checklist measures, compliance with the CCAP checklist measures would further reduce reliance on fossil fuels and expand the use of renewable energy.
1344
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
48 This page intentionally left blank
1345
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
49 7 REFERENCES

1. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2020 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2020.

2. Administration, U.S. Energy Information. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/state/data.php?sid=CA#ConsumptionExpenditures.

3. California Energy Commission. Transportation Energy Demand Forecast 2018-2030. 2018.

4. U.S. Department of Energy. Alternate Fuels Data Center. U.S. Department of Energy. [Online] https://afdc.energy.gov/states/ca.

5. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California Energy Consumption by End-Use Sector. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA#tabs-2.

6. California Energy Commission. 2021 Total System Electric Generation. CA.gov. [Online] https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/energy-almanac/california-electricity-data/2021-totalsystem-electricgeneration#:~:text=Total%20generation%20for%20California%20was,from%2090%2C208%20GWh% 20in%202020)..

7. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California State Profile and Energy Estimates. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=CA.

8. California Energy Commission. 2013 Integrated Energy Policy Report. 2013.

9. California ISO. Understanding the ISO. [Online]
http://www.caiso.com/about/Pages/OurBusiness/UnderstandingtheISO/default.aspx.

10. Southern California Edison. Southern California Edison's Service Area. [Online] https://download.newsroom.edison.com/create_memory_file/?f_id=5cc32d492cfac24d21aecf4c &content_verified=True.

11. Southern Californai Edison. 2019 Power Content Label. Southern California Edison. [Online] https://www.sce.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/SCE_2019PowerContentLabel.pdf.

12. California Public Utilities Commission. Natural Gas and California. [Online] https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/natural-gas/natural-gas-and-california.

13. Department of Motor Vehicles. State of California Department of Motor Vehicles Statistics For Publication January Through December 2021. 2021.

14. U.S. Energy Information Administration. California Analysis. Energy Information Administration. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/beta/states/states/ca/analysis.

15. California Energy Commission Staff. 2021 Integrated Energy Policy Report Update. [Online] 2021. https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/reports/integrated-energy-policy-report/2021- integrated-energy-policy-report.

16. The California Energy Commission. 2022 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. California Energy Commission. [Online] 2022. https://www.energy.ca.gov/programs-and-topics/programs/buildingenergy-efficiency-standards/2022-building-energy-efficiency.

17. California Energy Commission. Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS). [Online] 2002. http://www.energy.ca.gov/portfolio/.

18. City of Ontario. City of Ontario Climate Action Plan. 2014.

19. —. TOP 2050 SEIR. 2022.
1346
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
50 20. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act Guideline, California Public Resources Code, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3,.

21. Association of Environmental Professionals. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.

22. Urban Crossroads, Inc. IE Distribution Center #14 Air Quality Impact Analysis. 2022.

23. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). [Online] May 2022. www.caleemod.com.

24. California Department of Transportation. EMFAC Software. [Online] http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/env/air/pages/emfac.htm.

25. State of California. 2019 CEQA California Environmental Quality Act. 2019.

26. Pray, Richard. 2022 National Construction Estimator. Carlsbad : Craftsman Book Company, 2022.

27. Southern California Edison. Schedule GS-1 General Service. Regulatory Information - Rates Pricing. [Online]
https://edisonintl.sharepoint.com/teams/Public/TM2/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.asp x?ga=1&id=%2Fteams%2FPublic%2FTM2%2FShared%20Documents%2FPublic%2FRegulatory%2FT ariff%2DSCE%20Tariff%20Books%2FElectric%2FSchedules%2FGeneral%20Service%20%26%20Indu str.

28. California Air Resources Board. Methods to Find the Cost‐Effectiveness of Funding Air Quality Projects For Evaluating Motor Vehicle Registration Fee Projects And Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Projects, Emission Factor Tables. 2018.

29. —. Truck and Bus Regulation. [Online] https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/programs/truck-andbus-regulation. 1347
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
51 This page intentionally left blank
1348
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
52 8 CERTIFICATIONS
The contents of this energy analysis report represent an accurate depiction of the environmental impacts associated with the proposed 5355 East Airport Drive. The information contained in this energy analysis report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [email protected].

Haseeb Qureshi
Associate Principal
Urban Crossroads, Inc.
[email protected]

EDUCATION
Master of Science in Environmental Studies
California State University, Fullerton • May 2010
Bachelor of Arts in Environmental Analysis and Design
University of California, Irvine • June 2006

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
AEP – Association of Environmental Planners
AWMA – Air and Waste Management Association
ASTM – American Society for Testing and Materials

PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS
Planned Communities and Urban Infill – Urban Land Institute • June 2011 Indoor Air Quality and Industrial Hygiene – EMSL Analytical • April 2008 Principles of Ambient Air Monitoring – California Air Resources Board • August 2007 AB2588 Regulatory Standards – Trinity Consultants • November 2006 Air Dispersion Modeling – Lakes Environmental • June 2006 1349
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
1350
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
APPENDIX 4.1:

CALEEMOD EXISTING OPERATIONS EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
1351
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 1 / 29
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
1352
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 2 / 29

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated 1353
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 3 / 29

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
1354
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 4 / 29

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
1355
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 5 / 29

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

8. User Changes to Default Data
1356
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 6 / 29

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.06334566920109, -117.53410603073728
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5288
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

41.8 1000sqft 0.96 41,780 0.00 0.00 — —
1357
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 7 / 29

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.29 2.16 0.98 12.8 0.02 0.04 0.80 0.85 0.04 0.14 0.18 39.7 3,803 3,842 4.23 0.11 1,122 5,104 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.92 1.82 1.03 8.94 0.02 0.04 0.80 0.84 0.04 0.14 0.18 39.7 3,615 3,655 4.24 0.12 1,114 4,909 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.90 1.80 0.89 8.16 0.02 0.04 0.59 0.63 0.04 0.10 0.14 39.7 3,086 3,126 4.22 0.10 1,116 4,378 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.16 0.33 0.16 1.49 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.02 0.03 6.57 511 518 0.70 0.02 185 725

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1358
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 8 / 29
Mobile 0.92 0.84 0.54 10.7 0.02 0.01 0.80 0.81 0.01 0.14 0.15 — 2,242 2,242 0.08 0.05 8.87 2,269 Area 0.32 1.30 0.02 1.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.47 7.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.69 Energy 0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,490 1,490 0.14 0.01 — 1,498 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total 1.29 2.16 0.98 12.8 0.02 0.04 0.80 0.85 0.04 0.14 0.18 39.7 3,803 3,842 4.23 0.11 1,122 5,104 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.87 0.79 0.60 8.58 0.02 0.01 0.80 0.81 0.01 0.14 0.15 — 2,062 2,062 0.08 0.06 0.23 2,081 Area — 1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,490 1,490 0.14 0.01 — 1,498 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total 0.92 1.82 1.03 8.94 0.02 0.04 0.80 0.84 0.04 0.14 0.18 39.7 3,615 3,655 4.24 0.12 1,114 4,909 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.63 0.57 0.45 6.56 0.02 0.01 0.59 0.59 0.01 0.10 0.11 — 1,528 1,528 0.06 0.04 2.80 1,545 Area 0.22 1.20 0.01 1.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.12 5.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.27 Energy 0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,490 1,490 0.14 0.01 — 1,498 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total 0.90 1.80 0.89 8.16 0.02 0.04 0.59 0.63 0.04 0.10 0.14 39.7 3,086 3,126 4.22 0.10 1,116 4,378 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.12 0.10 0.08 1.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.11 0.11 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 — 253 253 0.01 0.01 0.46 256 Area 0.04 0.22 < 0.005 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.85 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.871359 IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 9 / 29
Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 247 247 0.02 < 0.005 — 248 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3.07 10.4 13.5 0.32 0.01 — 23.6 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.50 0.00 3.50 0.35 0.00 — 12.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 184 184
Total 0.16 0.33 0.16 1.49 < 0.005 0.01 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.02 0.03 6.57 511 518 0.70 0.02 185 725

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.92 0.84 0.54 10.7 0.02 0.01 0.10 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 2,242 2,242 0.08 0.05 8.87 2,269 Total 0.92 0.84 0.54 10.7 0.02 0.01 0.10 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 2,242 2,242 0.08 0.05 8.87 2,269 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.87 0.79 0.60 8.58 0.02 0.01 0.10 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 2,062 2,062 0.08 0.06 0.23 2,081 Total 0.87 0.79 0.60 8.58 0.02 0.01 0.10 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.04 — 2,062 2,062 0.08 0.06 0.23 2,081 1360
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 10 / 29
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.12 0.10 0.08 1.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 253 253 0.01 0.01 0.46 256 Total 0.12 0.10 0.08 1.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 253 253 0.01 0.01 0.46 256

4.2. Energy

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 509 509 0.05 < 0.005 — 511 Total 0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 509 509 0.05 < 0.005 — 511 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 509 509 0.05 < 0.005 — 511 Total 0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 509 509 0.05 < 0.005 — 511 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 84.3 84.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 84.5 Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 84.3 84.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 84.5 1362
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 12 / 29

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.32 0.30 0.02 1.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.47 7.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.69 Total 0.32 1.30 0.02 1.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.47 7.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.69 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1363
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 13 / 29
Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ural
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.04 0.04 < 0.005 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.85 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.87 Total 0.04 0.22 < 0.005 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.85 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.87

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1364
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 14 / 29
Unrefrige — — — — — — — — — — — 3.07 10.4 13.5 0.32 0.01 — 23.6 rated
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.07 10.4 13.5 0.32 0.01 — 23.6

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.50 0.00 3.50 0.35 0.00 — 12.3
1365
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 15 / 29
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.50 0.00 3.50 0.35 0.00 — 12.3

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 184 184
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 184 184
1366
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 16 / 29

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1367
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 17 / 29
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1368
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 18 / 29
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1369
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 19 / 29
Subtotal——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Remove d——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Remove d——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual——————————————————
Avoided——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Remove d——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
———————————————————
1370
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 20 / 29

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
207 17.5 7.02 55,311 3,007 254 102 802,453

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings
Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft) Residential Exterior Area Coated (sq ft) Non-Residential Interior Area Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
0 0.00 62,670 20,890 —

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
1371
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 21 / 29
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
1,027,373 349 0.0330 0.0040 794,266

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 9,661,625 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 39.3 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Equipment Type Refrigerant GWP Quantity (kg) Operations Leak Rate Service Leak Rate Times Serviced Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
Cold storage R-404A 3,922 7.50 7.50 7.50 25.0

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor 1372 IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 22 / 29

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration
1373
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 23 / 29

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

Sea Level Rise data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from Radke et al. (2017), as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider different increments of sea level rise coupled with extreme storm events. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential inundation depth for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 50 meters (m) by 50 m, or about 164 feet (ft) by 164 ft.

Wildfire data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The projections are from UC Davis, as reported in Cal-Adapt (2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5), and consider historical data of climate, vegetation, population density, and large (> 400 ha) fire history. Users may select from four model simulations to view the range in potential wildfire probabilities for the grid cell. The four simulations make different assumptions about expected rainfall and temperature are: Warmer/drier (HadGEM2-ES), Cooler/wetter (CNRM-CM5), Average conditions (CanESM2), Range of different rainfall and temperature possibilities (MIROC5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
1374
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 24 / 29
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores do not include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details
1375
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 25 / 29

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 91.1
AQ-PM 95.7
AQ-DPM 96.6
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 8.61
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 78.9
Traffic 89.1
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 30.9
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 78.8
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 70.4
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 47.3
Cardio-vascular 67.3
Low Birth Weights 57.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 40.5
Housing 32.3
Linguistic 18.1
Poverty 23.9
1376
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 26 / 29
Unemployment 53.9

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 76.78686
Employed 63.51854228
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 44.59129988
High school enrollment 3.977928911
Preschool enrollment 15.60374695
Transportation —
Auto Access 88.68215065
Active commuting 10.11163865
Social —
2-parent households 11.86962659
Voting 50.91749006
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 69.3314513
Park access 61.63223406
Retail density 69.31861927
Supermarket access 2.399589375
Tree canopy 29.69331451
Housing —
Homeownership 78.81432054
Housing habitability 80.20017965
1377
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 27 / 29
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 88.74631079 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 37.86731682
Uncrowded housing 60.77248813
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 67.2783267
Arthritis 74.6
Asthma ER Admissions 54.3
High Blood Pressure 79.9
Cancer (excluding skin) 68.9
Asthma 49.0
Coronary Heart Disease 85.5
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 74.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 64.3
Life Expectancy at Birth 52.5
Cognitively Disabled 87.2
Physically Disabled 77.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.4
Mental Health Not Good 50.5
Chronic Kidney Disease 79.8
Obesity 43.5
Pedestrian Injuries 99.0
Physical Health Not Good 58.2
Stroke 80.6
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 19.3
Current Smoker 53.5
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 61.3
1378
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 28 / 29
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 32.5
Elderly 84.2
English Speaking 91.4
Foreign-born 35.9
Outdoor Workers 45.5
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 76.5
Traffic Density 89.2
Traffic Access 46.3
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.0
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 74.5

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 65.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 42.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 1379
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 29 / 29

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health and Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip rates based on existing activities Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY)
Operations: Energy Use Electricity usage based on electricity bills provided by Applicant 1380
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 1 / 29
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
1381
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 2 / 29

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 1382
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 3 / 29

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
1383
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 4 / 29

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
1384
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 5 / 29

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

8. User Changes to Default Data
1385
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 6 / 29

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.06334566920109, -117.53410603073728
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5288
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

41.8 1000sqft 0.96 41,780 0.00 0.00 — —
1386
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 7 / 29

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.30 1.51 9.14 7.26 0.07 0.15 1.11 1.27 0.15 0.27 0.41 39.7 8,807 8,847 4.87 1.17 1,133 10,451 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.96 1.20 9.51 5.46 0.07 0.15 1.11 1.26 0.14 0.27 0.41 39.7 8,802 8,842 4.87 1.17 1,114 10,427 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.94 1.36 7.14 5.32 0.05 0.12 0.81 0.93 0.12 0.20 0.31 39.7 6,858 6,897 4.68 0.87 1,120 8,395 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.17 0.25 1.30 0.97 0.01 0.02 0.15 0.17 0.02 0.04 0.06 6.57 1,135 1,142 0.78 0.14 185 1,390

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1387
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 8 / 29
Mobile 0.93 0.19 8.70 5.08 0.06 0.12 1.11 1.23 0.11 0.27 0.38 — 7,247 7,247 0.72 1.11 19.2 7,616 Area 0.32 1.30 0.02 1.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.47 7.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.69 Energy 0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,490 1,490 0.14 0.01 — 1,498 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total 1.30 1.51 9.14 7.26 0.07 0.15 1.11 1.27 0.15 0.27 0.41 39.7 8,807 8,847 4.87 1.17 1,133 10,451 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.92 0.18 9.08 5.10 0.06 0.12 1.11 1.23 0.11 0.27 0.38 — 7,249 7,249 0.72 1.12 0.50 7,600 Area — 1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,490 1,490 0.14 0.01 — 1,498 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total 0.96 1.20 9.51 5.46 0.07 0.15 1.11 1.26 0.14 0.27 0.41 39.7 8,802 8,842 4.87 1.17 1,114 10,427 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.67 0.13 6.71 3.72 0.05 0.08 0.81 0.90 0.08 0.20 0.28 — 5,299 5,299 0.52 0.82 6.07 5,562 Area 0.22 1.20 0.01 1.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.12 5.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.27 Energy 0.05 0.02 0.43 0.36 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 1,490 1,490 0.14 0.01 — 1,498 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total 0.94 1.36 7.14 5.32 0.05 0.12 0.81 0.93 0.12 0.20 0.31 39.7 6,858 6,897 4.68 0.87 1,120 8,395 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.12 0.02 1.22 0.68 0.01 0.02 0.15 0.16 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 877 877 0.09 0.14 1.01 921 Area 0.04 0.22 < 0.005 0.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 0.85 0.85 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.871388 IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 9 / 29
Energy 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 247 247 0.02 < 0.005 — 248 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 3.07 10.4 13.5 0.32 0.01 — 23.6 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 3.50 0.00 3.50 0.35 0.00 — 12.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 184 184
Total 0.17 0.25 1.30 0.97 0.01 0.02 0.15 0.17 0.02 0.04 0.06 6.57 1,135 1,142 0.78 0.14 185 1,390

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

0.93 0.19 8.70 5.08 0.06 0.12 0.57 0.69 0.11 0.18 0.30 — 7,247 7,247 0.72 1.11 19.2 7,616 Total 0.93 0.19 8.70 5.08 0.06 0.12 0.57 0.69 0.11 0.18 0.30 — 7,247 7,247 0.72 1.11 19.2 7,616 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.92 0.18 9.08 5.10 0.06 0.12 0.57 0.69 0.11 0.18 0.30 — 7,249 7,249 0.72 1.12 0.50 7,600 Total 0.92 0.18 9.08 5.10 0.06 0.12 0.57 0.69 0.11 0.18 0.30 — 7,249 7,249 0.72 1.12 0.50 7,600 1389
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 10 / 29
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.12 0.02 1.22 0.68 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.04 — 877 877 0.09 0.14 1.01 921 Total 0.12 0.02 1.22 0.68 0.01 0.02 0.08 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.04 — 877 877 0.09 0.14 1.01 921

4.2. Energy

0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 84.3 84.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 84.5 Total 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 84.3 84.3 0.01 < 0.005 — 84.5 1391
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 12 / 29

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

0.32 0.30 0.02 1.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.47 7.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.69 Total 0.32 1.30 0.02 1.82 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.47 7.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.69 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1392
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 13 / 29
Architect — 0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ural
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 18.5 62.8 81.3 1.90 0.05 — 143 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1393
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 14 / 29
Unrefrige — — — — — — — — — — — 3.07 10.4 13.5 0.32 0.01 — 23.6 rated
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.07 10.4 13.5 0.32 0.01 — 23.6

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 21.2 0.00 21.2 2.12 0.00 — 74.1 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 3.50 0.00 3.50 0.35 0.00 — 12.3
1394
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 15 / 29
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 3.50 0.00 3.50 0.35 0.00 — 12.3

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,113 1,113
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 184 184
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 184 184
1395
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 16 / 29

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1396
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 17 / 29
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1397
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 18 / 29
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1398
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 19 / 29
Subtotal——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Remove d——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
———————————————————
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Avoided——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Remove d——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
———————————————————
Annual——————————————————
Avoided——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Sequest
ered
——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
Remove d——————————————————
Subtotal——————————————————
———————————————————
1399
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 20 / 29

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
106 8.93 3.57 28,184 2,337 198 79.1 623,606

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
1400
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 21 / 29
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
1,027,373 349 0.0330 0.0040 794,266

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 9,661,625 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 39.3 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor 1401 IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 22 / 29

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration
1402
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 23 / 29

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
1403
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 24 / 29
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details
1404
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 25 / 29

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 91.1
AQ-PM 95.7
AQ-DPM 96.6
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 8.61
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 78.9
Traffic 89.1
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 30.9
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 78.8
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 70.4
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 47.3
Cardio-vascular 67.3
Low Birth Weights 57.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 40.5
Housing 32.3
Linguistic 18.1
Poverty 23.9
1405
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 26 / 29
Unemployment 53.9

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 76.78686
Employed 63.51854228
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 44.59129988
High school enrollment 3.977928911
Preschool enrollment 15.60374695
Transportation —
Auto Access 88.68215065
Active commuting 10.11163865
Social —
2-parent households 11.86962659
Voting 50.91749006
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 69.3314513
Park access 61.63223406
Retail density 69.31861927
Supermarket access 2.399589375
Tree canopy 29.69331451
Housing —
Homeownership 78.81432054
Housing habitability 80.20017965
1406
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 27 / 29
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 88.74631079 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 37.86731682
Uncrowded housing 60.77248813
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 67.2783267
Arthritis 74.6
Asthma ER Admissions 54.3
High Blood Pressure 79.9
Cancer (excluding skin) 68.9
Asthma 49.0
Coronary Heart Disease 85.5
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 74.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 64.3
Life Expectancy at Birth 52.5
Cognitively Disabled 87.2
Physically Disabled 77.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.4
Mental Health Not Good 50.5
Chronic Kidney Disease 79.8
Obesity 43.5
Pedestrian Injuries 99.0
Physical Health Not Good 58.2
Stroke 80.6
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 19.3
Current Smoker 53.5
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 61.3
1407
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 28 / 29
Climate Change Exposures —
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 32.5
Elderly 84.2
English Speaking 91.4
Foreign-born 35.9
Outdoor Workers 45.5
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 76.5
Traffic Density 89.2
Traffic Access 46.3
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.0
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 74.5

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores
Metric Result for Project Census Tract
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Score for Project Location (a) 65.0 Healthy Places Index Score for Project Location (b) 42.0 Project Located in a Designated Disadvantaged Community (Senate Bill 535) Yes Project Located in a Low-Income Community (Assembly Bill 1550) No Project Located in a Community Air Protection Program Community (Assembly Bill 617) No a: The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state. b: The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state. 1408
IE Distribution Center #14 (Existing Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 29 / 29

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health and Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip rates based on existing activities Operations: Fleet Mix Truck Mix based on SCAQMD recommended truck mix Operations: Energy Use Electricity usage based on bills provided by the Applicant 1409
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
1410
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
APPENDIX 5.1:

CALEEMOD PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
1411
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 1 / 33
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated

3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated

3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated

3.7. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated

3.9. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated

3.11. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
1412
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 2 / 33

3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
1413
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 3 / 33

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
1414
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 4 / 33

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

8. User Changes to Default Data
1415
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 5 / 33

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction)
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.06334566920109, -117.53410603073728
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5288
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area (sq ft)
Population Description
Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
243 1000sqft 7.08 243,303 65,274 0.00 — —
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

27.0 1000sqft 0.79 27,034 7,253 0.00 — —
1416
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 6 / 33
Parking Lot 299 Space 1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
161 1000sqft 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.1. Construction Emissions Compared Against Thresholds Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.13 47.2 39.6 71.8 0.13 0.38 9.62 9.95 0.36 4.00 4.32 — 15,836 15,836 0.86 0.60 10.9 16,044 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.08 47.1 30.4 53.5 0.07 0.38 2.20 2.58 0.36 0.52 0.89 — 9,589 9,589 0.43 0.25 0.28 9,674 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.67 4.08 10.5 18.5 0.03 0.13 1.31 1.44 0.12 0.45 0.57 — 3,729 3,729 0.19 0.12 1.43 3,770 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.12 0.74 1.92 3.37 0.01 0.02 0.24 0.26 0.02 0.08 0.10 — 617 617 0.03 0.02 0.24 624

2.2. Construction Emissions by Year, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 1417
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 7 / 33
Year TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily -
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 2.13 1.77 39.6 71.8 0.13 0.33 9.62 9.95 0.32 4.00 4.32 — 15,836 15,836 0.86 0.60 9.37 16,044 2024 2.12 47.2 30.2 56.6 0.07 0.38 2.20 2.58 0.36 0.52 0.89 — 9,771 9,771 0.43 0.25 10.9 9,867 Daily -
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 1.65 1.48 21.7 39.8 0.06 0.26 1.70 1.96 0.25 0.41 0.65 — 7,437 7,437 0.35 0.22 0.24 7,510 2024 2.08 47.1 30.4 53.5 0.07 0.38 2.20 2.58 0.36 0.52 0.89 — 9,589 9,589 0.43 0.25 0.28 9,674 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.67 0.59 10.5 18.5 0.03 0.13 1.31 1.44 0.12 0.45 0.57 — 3,729 3,729 0.19 0.12 1.43 3,770 2024 0.38 4.08 5.50 9.86 0.01 0.07 0.40 0.46 0.06 0.09 0.16 — 1,790 1,790 0.08 0.05 0.88 1,807 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2023 0.12 0.11 1.92 3.37 0.01 0.02 0.24 0.26 0.02 0.08 0.10 — 617 617 0.03 0.02 0.24 624 2024 0.07 0.74 1.00 1.80 < 0.005 0.01 0.07 0.08 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 296 296 0.01 0.01 0.14 299

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Demolition (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.54 0.51 12.7 18.7 0.03 0.23 — 0.23 0.22 — 0.22 — 3,529 3,529 0.14 0.03 — 3,541 1418
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 8 / 33
Demolitio — — — — — — 0.45 0.45 — 0.07 0.07 — — — — — — — Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.09 0.08 2.09 3.07 0.01 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 580 580 0.02 < 0.005 — 582 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.07 0.07 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.02 0.02 0.38 0.56 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 96.0 96.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 96.4 Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.10 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 264 264 0.01 0.01 1.13 268 Vendor 0.04 0.01 0.38 0.20 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 317 317 0.03 0.05 0.87 332 Hauling 0.03 < 0.005 0.27 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 214 214 0.02 0.03 0.45 226 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1419
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 9 / 33
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.22 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 40.4 40.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 41.0 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.06 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 52.1 52.1 < 0.005 0.01 0.06 54.6 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 35.2 35.2 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 37.0 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 6.69 6.69 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.78 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 8.63 8.63 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 9.03 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.84 5.84 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.13

3.3. Site Preparation (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.68 0.68 15.7 30.0 0.05 0.10 — 0.10 0.10 — 0.10 — 5,530 5,530 0.22 0.04 — 5,549 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 5.66 5.66 — 2.69 2.69 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.06 0.06 1.29 2.46 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 455 455 0.02 < 0.005 — 456 1420
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 10 / 33
Dust — — — — — — 0.47 0.47 — 0.22 0.22 — — — — — — —
From
Material
Movement
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.24 0.45 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 75.2 75.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 75.5 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.08 0.08 — 0.04 0.04 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.11 0.10 0.10 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 264 264 0.01 0.01 1.13 268 Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.19 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 158 158 0.01 0.02 0.44 166 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 20.2 20.2 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 20.5 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.0 13.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.6 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 3.34 3.34 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.39 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.16 2.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.261421 IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 11 / 33
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.5. Grading (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.82 0.82 19.9 36.2 0.06 0.18 — 0.18 0.18 — 0.18 — 6,715 6,715 0.27 0.05 — 6,738 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.67 2.67 — 0.98 0.98 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.07 0.07 1.64 2.97 0.01 0.02 — 0.02 0.01 — 0.01 — 552 552 0.02 < 0.005 — 554 Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.22 0.22 — 0.08 0.08 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.30 0.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 91.4 91.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 91.7 1422
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 12 / 33
Dust
From
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.04 0.04 — 0.01 0.01 — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.12 0.11 0.11 1.85 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 294 294 0.01 0.01 1.26 298 Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.19 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 158 158 0.01 0.02 0.44 166 Hauling 0.37 0.06 3.43 1.91 0.02 0.03 0.20 0.23 0.03 0.07 0.10 — 2,716 2,716 0.31 0.43 5.65 2,857 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 22.4 22.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 22.8 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 13.0 13.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 13.6 Hauling 0.03 < 0.005 0.30 0.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 223 223 0.03 0.04 0.20 235 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 3.72 3.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.77 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.16 2.16 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 2.26 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.05 0.03 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 37.0 37.0 < 0.005 0.01 0.03 38.8

3.7. Building Construction (2023) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1423
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 13 / 33
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.87 20.0 31.4 0.05 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 5,110 5,110 0.21 0.04 — 5,128 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.87 20.0 31.4 0.05 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 5,110 5,110 0.21 0.04 — 5,128 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.21 0.20 4.61 7.24 0.01 0.06 — 0.06 0.05 — 0.05 — 1,180 1,180 0.05 0.01 — 1,184 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.04 0.84 1.32 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 195 195 0.01 < 0.005 — 196 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.69 0.63 0.60 10.6 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1,675 1,675 0.07 0.06 7.18 1,700 Vendor 0.09 0.02 0.94 0.51 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 792 792 0.07 0.12 2.19 831 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1424
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 14 / 33
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Winter
(Max)
Worker 0.65 0.59 0.70 7.94 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1,534 1,534 0.07 0.06 0.19 1,553 Vendor 0.09 0.02 0.98 0.51 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 793 793 0.07 0.12 0.06 829 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.15 0.13 0.16 1.94 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 359 359 0.02 0.01 0.72 364 Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.23 0.12 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 183 183 0.02 0.03 0.22 192 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.35 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 59.5 59.5 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 60.3 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 30.3 30.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 31.7 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.9. Building Construction (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.87 20.0 31.4 0.05 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 5,110 5,110 0.21 0.04 — 5,127 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1425
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 15 / 33
Off-Road
Equipment

0.91 0.87 20.0 31.4 0.05 0.25 — 0.25 0.23 — 0.23 — 5,110 5,110 0.21 0.04 — 5,127 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.19 0.18 4.14 6.51 0.01 0.05 — 0.05 0.05 — 0.05 — 1,060 1,060 0.04 0.01 — 1,064 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.76 1.19 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 175 175 0.01 < 0.005 — 176 Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.65 0.60 0.55 9.64 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1,641 1,641 0.07 0.06 6.56 1,666 Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.90 0.48 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 784 784 0.06 0.12 2.19 822 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.62 0.56 0.65 7.29 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 1,504 1,504 0.07 0.06 0.17 1,523 Vendor 0.08 0.02 0.94 0.49 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 — 784 784 0.06 0.12 0.06 821 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.13 0.12 0.14 1.59 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 316 316 0.01 0.01 0.59 321 Vendor 0.02 < 0.005 0.20 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 163 163 0.01 0.02 0.20 170 1426
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 16 / 33
Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.29 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 52.4 52.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.10 53.1 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 26.9 26.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 28.2 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

3.11. Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.23 7.21 10.6 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,512 1,512 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.23 0.23 7.21 10.6 0.01 0.09 — 0.09 0.08 — 0.08 — 1,512 1,512 0.06 0.01 — 1,517 Paving — 0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.89 1.31 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 186 186 0.01 < 0.005 — 187 Paving — 0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1427
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 17 / 33
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.16 0.24 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 30.9 30.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 31.0 Paving — 0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.09 0.08 0.07 1.27 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 216 216 0.01 0.01 0.86 219 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.08 0.07 0.09 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 198 198 0.01 0.01 0.02 200 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 24.7 24.7 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 25.1 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 4.10 4.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.15 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1428
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 18 / 33

3.13. Architectural Coating (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 1.43 1.28 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 178 178 0.01 < 0.005 — 179 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 44.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 1.43 1.28 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 178 178 0.01 < 0.005 — 179 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 44.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.12 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 14.6 14.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 14.7 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 3.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1429
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 19 / 33
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 2.42 2.42 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.43 Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Onsite
truck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.13 0.12 0.11 1.95 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 331 331 0.01 0.01 1.32 336 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.13 0.11 0.13 1.47 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 303 303 0.01 0.01 0.03 307 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 25.3 25.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.05 25.7 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 4.19 4.19 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.25 Vendor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hauling 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1430
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 20 / 33

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1431
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 21 / 33
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1432
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 22 / 33
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Demolition 5/2/2023 7/24/2023 5.00 60.0 —
Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/25/2023 9/4/2023 5.00 30.0 — Grading Grading 7/25/2023 9/4/2023 5.00 30.0 —
Building Construction Building Construction 9/5/2023 4/15/2024 5.00 160 — Paving Paving 2/13/2024 4/15/2024 5.00 45.0 —
Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/5/2024 4/15/2024 5.00 30.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 367 0.40 1433
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 23 / 33
Demolition Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Concrete/Industrial
Saws
Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 33.0 0.73
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 3.00 8.00 367 0.40 Grading Graders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 148 0.41 Grading Excavators Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Grading Scrapers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 423 0.48 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 367 0.40 Building Construction Forklifts Diesel Tier 4 Interim 5.00 8.00 82.0 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Building Construction Cranes Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 367 0.29 Building Construction Welders Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 46.0 0.45 Paving Pavers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 81.0 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Site Preparation Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 4.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Grading Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 2.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Building Construction Crawler Tractors Diesel Tier 4 Interim 5.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Demolition Generator Sets Diesel Tier 4 Interim 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 18.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor 10.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT 1434
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 24 / 33
Demolition Hauling 3.00 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Site Preparation————
Site Preparation Worker 18.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Site Preparation Vendor 5.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Site Preparation Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Site Preparation Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Grading————
Grading Worker 20.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 5.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 38.0 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Building Construction————
Building Construction Worker 114 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Building Construction Vendor 25.0 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Building Construction Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Building Construction Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Paving————
Paving Worker 15.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor 0.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
Architectural Coating————
Architectural Coating Worker 23.0 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Architectural Coating Vendor 0.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Architectural Coating Hauling 0.00 20.0 HHDT
Architectural Coating Onsite truck 0.00 0.00 HHDT
1435
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 25 / 33

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Non-applicable. No control strategies activated by user.

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated (sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)
Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 415,727 138,576 13,629

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Yards) Material Exported (Cubic Yards) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Ton of Debris)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,922 —
Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 105 0.00 —
Grading 0.00 9,000 120 0.00 —
Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.21

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Exposed Area 3 74% 74%
Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
1436
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 26 / 33
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0%
Parking Lot 1.53 100%
Other Asphalt Surfaces 3.68 100%

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors kWh per Year and Emission Factor (lb/MWh)
Year kWh per Year CO2 CH4 N2O
2023 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005
2024 0.00 532 0.03 < 0.005

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year) 1437
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 27 / 33

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
1438
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 28 / 33
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract 1439
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 29 / 33
Exposure Indicators—
AQ-Ozone 91.1
AQ-PM 95.7
AQ-DPM 96.6
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 8.61
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 78.9
Traffic 89.1
Effect Indicators—
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 30.9
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 78.8
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 70.4
Sensitive Population—
Asthma 47.3
Cardio-vascular 67.3
Low Birth Weights 57.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators—
Education 40.5
Housing 32.3
Linguistic 18.1
Poverty 23.9
Unemployment 53.9

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores
1440
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 30 / 33
The maximum Health Places Index score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects healthier community conditions compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 76.78686
Employed 63.51854228
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 44.59129988
High school enrollment 3.977928911
Preschool enrollment 15.60374695
Transportation —
Auto Access 88.68215065
Active commuting 10.11163865
Social —
2-parent households 11.86962659
Voting 50.91749006
Neighborhood —
Alcohol availability 69.3314513
Park access 61.63223406
Retail density 69.31861927
Supermarket access 2.399589375
Tree canopy 29.69331451
Housing —
Homeownership 78.81432054
Housing habitability 80.20017965
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 88.74631079 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 37.86731682
Uncrowded housing 60.77248813
Health Outcomes —
1441
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 31 / 33
Insured adults 67.2783267
Arthritis 74.6
Asthma ER Admissions 54.3
High Blood Pressure 79.9
Cancer (excluding skin) 68.9
Asthma 49.0
Coronary Heart Disease 85.5
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 74.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 64.3
Life Expectancy at Birth 52.5
Cognitively Disabled 87.2
Physically Disabled 77.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.4
Mental Health Not Good 50.5
Chronic Kidney Disease 79.8
Obesity 43.5
Pedestrian Injuries 99.0
Physical Health Not Good 58.2
Stroke 80.6
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 19.3
Current Smoker 53.5
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 61.3
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 32.5
1442
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 32 / 33
Elderly 84.2
English Speaking 91.4
Foreign-born 35.9
Outdoor Workers 45.5
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 76.5
Traffic Density 89.2
Traffic Access 46.3
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.0
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 74.5

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health and Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.
1443
IE Distribution Center #14 (Construction) Detailed Report, 8/19/2022 33 / 33

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Total Project Site is 13.08 acres
Construction: Construction Phases Construction anticipated to end in April 2024 Construction: Off-Road Equipment Construction equipment based on equipment needed for other industrial projects within the area Construction: Trips and VMT Vendor Trips adjusted based on CalEEMod defaults for Building Construction and number of days for Demolition, Site Preparation, Grading, and Building Construction Construction: Architectural Coatings Rule 1113
1444
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
1445
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
APPENDIX 5.2:

CALEEMOD PROJECT OPERATIONS EMISSIONS MODEL OUTPUTS
1446
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 1 / 34
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
1447
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 2 / 34

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 1448
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 3 / 34

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
1449
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 4 / 34

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
1450
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 5 / 34

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

8. User Changes to Default Data
1451
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 6 / 34

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.06334566920109, -117.53410603073728
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5288
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

27.0 1000sqft 0.79 27,034 7,253 0.00 — —
1452
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 7 / 34
Parking Lot 299 Space 1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —
Other Asphalt
Surfaces
161 1000sqft 3.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 — —

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.75 9.84 3.77 29.9 0.05 0.25 1.18 1.43 0.25 0.20 0.45 257 8,875 9,132 26.6 0.41 6,525 16,442 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.60 7.85 3.76 15.0 0.05 0.23 1.18 1.41 0.23 0.20 0.43 257 8,562 8,818 26.6 0.41 6,512 16,117 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.68 8.85 3.60 20.1 0.04 0.24 0.86 1.10 0.24 0.15 0.39 257 7,811 8,068 26.6 0.39 6,516 15,364 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.49 1.61 0.66 3.67 0.01 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.03 0.07 42.5 1,293 1,336 4.40 0.06 1,079 2,544

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 1453
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 8 / 34
Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.35 1.23 0.80 15.7 0.03 0.01 1.18 1.19 0.01 0.20 0.21 — 3,299 3,299 0.11 0.08 13.1 3,338 Area 2.09 8.45 0.10 11.8 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 48.3 48.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.8 Energy 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 5,116 5,116 0.46 0.03 — 5,135 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00 — 479 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
Total 3.75 9.84 3.77 29.9 0.05 0.25 1.18 1.43 0.25 0.20 0.45 257 8,875 9,132 26.6 0.41 6,525 16,442 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.28 1.16 0.89 12.6 0.03 0.01 1.18 1.19 0.01 0.20 0.21 — 3,033 3,033 0.12 0.09 0.34 3,062 Area — 6.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 5,116 5,116 0.46 0.03 — 5,135 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00 — 479 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
Total 1.60 7.85 3.76 15.0 0.05 0.23 1.18 1.41 0.23 0.20 0.43 257 8,562 8,818 26.6 0.41 6,512 16,117 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.93 0.85 0.67 9.65 0.02 0.01 0.86 0.87 0.01 0.15 0.16 — 2,250 2,250 0.08 0.06 4.12 2,275 Area 1.43 7.84 0.07 8.05 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 33.1 33.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 34.1 Energy 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 5,116 5,116 0.46 0.03 — 5,135 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00 — 479 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
1454
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 9 / 34
Total 2.68 8.85 3.60 20.1 0.04 0.24 0.86 1.10 0.24 0.15 0.39 257 7,811 8,068 26.6 0.39 6,516 15,364 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.17 0.15 0.12 1.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.16 0.16 < 0.005 0.03 0.03 — 373 373 0.01 0.01 0.68 377 Area 0.26 1.43 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.48 5.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.64 Energy 0.06 0.03 0.52 0.44 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 847 847 0.08 < 0.005 — 850 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 19.8 68.3 88.1 2.04 0.05 — 154 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 22.7 0.00 22.7 2.27 0.00 — 79.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,078 1,078
Total 0.49 1.61 0.66 3.67 0.01 0.04 0.16 0.20 0.04 0.03 0.07 42.5 1,293 1,336 4.40 0.06 1,079 2,544

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

1.18 1.08 0.70 13.8 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 2,892 2,892 0.10 0.07 11.4 2,926 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.17 0.15 0.10 1.94 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 407 407 0.01 0.01 1.61 412 1455
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 10 / 34
Parking 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Lot
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.35 1.23 0.80 15.7 0.03 0.01 0.15 0.17 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 3,299 3,299 0.11 0.08 13.1 3,338 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

1.13 1.02 0.78 11.1 0.03 0.01 0.13 0.15 0.01 0.04 0.05 — 2,659 2,659 0.10 0.07 0.30 2,684 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.16 0.14 0.11 1.56 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 374 374 0.01 0.01 0.04 378 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 1.28 1.16 0.89 12.6 0.03 0.01 0.15 0.17 0.01 0.05 0.06 — 3,033 3,033 0.12 0.09 0.34 3,062 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.15 0.14 0.11 1.54 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 327 327 0.01 0.01 0.60 330 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.02 0.02 0.02 0.22 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 45.9 45.9 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.08 46.4 1456
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 11 / 34
Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.17 0.15 0.12 1.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 373 373 0.01 0.01 0.68 377

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,073 1,073 0.10 0.01 — 1,080
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 565 565 0.05 0.01 — 569
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 55.8 55.8 0.01 < 0.005 — 56.1
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,695 1,695 0.16 0.02 — 1,704 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1457
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 12 / 34
Unrefrige
Warehouse-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 1,073 1,073 0.10 0.01 — 1,080
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 565 565 0.05 0.01 — 569
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 55.8 55.8 0.01 < 0.005 — 56.1
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,695 1,695 0.16 0.02 — 1,704 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 178 178 0.02 < 0.005 — 179
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — 93.6 93.6 0.01 < 0.005 — 94.1
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — — 9.23 9.23 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 9.29 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — 281 281 0.03 < 0.005 — 282

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 1458
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 13 / 34
Land TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Use
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.27 0.14 2.48 2.09 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.19 — 0.19 — 2,965 2,965 0.26 0.01 — 2,973 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 456 456 0.04 < 0.005 — 458 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 3,421 3,421 0.30 0.01 — 3,431 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.27 0.14 2.48 2.09 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.19 — 0.19 — 2,965 2,965 0.26 0.01 — 2,973 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 456 456 0.04 < 0.005 — 458 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 1459
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 14 / 34
Other 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt
Surfaces
Total 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 3,421 3,421 0.30 0.01 — 3,431 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.05 0.02 0.45 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 491 491 0.04 < 0.005 — 492 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 75.6 75.6 0.01 < 0.005 — 75.8 Parking
Lot

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Other
Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Total 0.06 0.03 0.52 0.44 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 566 566 0.05 < 0.005 — 568

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 5.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1460
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 15 / 34
Architect — 0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
ural
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

2.09 1.93 0.10 11.8 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 48.3 48.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.8 Total 2.09 8.45 0.10 11.8 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 48.3 48.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.8 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 5.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 6.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.26 0.24 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.48 5.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.64 Total 0.26 1.43 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.48 5.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.64

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 1461 IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 16 / 34
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 108 371 479 11.1 0.27 — 836
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.0 41.2 53.2 1.23 0.03 — 92.9
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 108 371 479 11.1 0.27 — 836
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.0 41.2 53.2 1.23 0.03 — 92.9
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
1462
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 17 / 34
Other — — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 Asphalt
Surfaces
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 17.8 61.4 79.3 1.84 0.04 — 138
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.98 6.83 8.81 0.20 < 0.005 — 15.4 Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 19.8 68.3 88.1 2.04 0.05 — 154

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1463
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 18 / 34
Unrefrige——————————— 123 0.00 123 12.3 0.00— 431
rated Warehou
se-No
Rail
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 13.7 0.00 13.7 1.37 0.00— 47.9
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00— 479
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
——————————————————
Unrefrige
rated Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 123 0.00 123 12.3 0.00— 431
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
——————————— 13.7 0.00 13.7 1.37 0.00— 47.9
Parking
Lot
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
——————————— 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00— 0.00
Total——————————— 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00— 479
Annual——————————————————
1464
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 19 / 34
Unrefrige
Warehouse-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 20.4 0.00 20.4 2.04 0.00 — 71.4
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 2.27 0.00 2.27 0.23 0.00 — 7.93
Parking
Lot
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Other
Asphalt
Surfaces
— — — — — — — — — — — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 22.7 0.00 22.7 2.27 0.00 — 79.3

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,484 6,484
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 27.6 27.6
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
1465
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 20 / 34
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,484 6,484
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 27.6 27.6
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,074 1,074
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.56 4.56
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,078 1,078

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e 1466
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 21 / 34
Daily, — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Summer
(Max)
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type
1467
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 22 / 34

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1468
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 23 / 34
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1469
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 24 / 34
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
1470
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 25 / 34
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
267 23.5 9.37 71,399 3,878 340 136 1,035,864
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

37.6 3.18 1.27 10,041 546 46.2 18.5 145,674
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt
Surfaces

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) 1471
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 26 / 34
Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
1,123,744 349 0.0330 0.0040 4,625,355
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 591,921 349 0.0330 0.0040 712,190 Parking Lot 58,383 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 349 0.0330 0.0040 0.00

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 56,263,819 1,048,248
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 6,251,613 116,472
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 229 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 25.4 0.00
Parking Lot 0.00 0.00
Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment 1472
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 27 / 34

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation
1473
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 28 / 34

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

Climate Hazard Result for Project Location Unit
Temperature and Extreme Heat 19.1 annual days of extreme heat Extreme Precipitation 5.30 annual days with precipitation above 20 mm Sea Level Rise 0.00 meters of inundation depth
Wildfire 0.00 annual hectares burned
Temperature and Extreme Heat data are for grid cell in which your project are located. The projection is based on the 98th historical percentile of daily maximum/minimum temperatures from observed historical data (32 climate model ensemble from Cal-Adapt, 2040–2059 average under RCP 8.5). Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi. 1474
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 29 / 34
Extreme Precipitation data are for the grid cell in which your project are located. The threshold of 20 mm is equivalent to about ¾ an inch of rain, which would be light to moderate rainfall if received over a full day or heavy rain if received over a period of 2 to 4 hours. Each grid cell is 6 kilometers (km) by 6 km, or 3.7 miles (mi) by 3.7 mi.

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A 1475
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 30 / 34
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 91.1
AQ-PM 95.7
AQ-DPM 96.6
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 8.61
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 78.9
Traffic 89.1
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 30.9
1476
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 31 / 34
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 78.8
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 70.4
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 47.3
Cardio-vascular 67.3
Low Birth Weights 57.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 40.5
Housing 32.3
Linguistic 18.1
Poverty 23.9
Unemployment 53.9

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 76.78686
Employed 63.51854228
Education —
Bachelor's or higher 44.59129988
High school enrollment 3.977928911
Preschool enrollment 15.60374695
Transportation —
Auto Access 88.68215065
Active commuting 10.11163865
1477
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 32 / 34
Social—
2-parent households 11.86962659
Voting 50.91749006
Neighborhood—
Alcohol availability 69.3314513
Park access 61.63223406
Retail density 69.31861927
Supermarket access 2.399589375
Tree canopy 29.69331451
Housing—
Homeownership 78.81432054
Housing habitability 80.20017965
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 88.74631079 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 37.86731682
Uncrowded housing 60.77248813
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 67.2783267
Arthritis 74.6
Asthma ER Admissions 54.3
High Blood Pressure 79.9
Cancer (excluding skin) 68.9
Asthma 49.0
Coronary Heart Disease 85.5
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 74.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 64.3
Life Expectancy at Birth 52.5
Cognitively Disabled 87.2
1478
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 33 / 34
Physically Disabled 77.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.4
Mental Health Not Good 50.5
Chronic Kidney Disease 79.8
Obesity 43.5
Pedestrian Injuries 99.0
Physical Health Not Good 58.2
Stroke 80.6
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 19.3
Current Smoker 53.5
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 61.3
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 32.5
Elderly 84.2
English Speaking 91.4
Foreign-born 35.9
Outdoor Workers 45.5
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity—
Impervious Surface Cover 76.5
Traffic Density 89.2
Traffic Access 46.3
Other Indices—
Hardship 44.0
Other Decision Support—
1479
IE Distribution Center #14 (Passenger Car Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 34 / 34
2016 Voting 74.5

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health and Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use Total Project Area is 13.08 acres
Operations: Vehicle Data Trip rates based on information provided in ITE 11th Edition Operations: Fleet Mix Passenger Car Mix estimated based on the CalEEMod default fleet mix and the ratio of the vehicle classes (LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, & MCY)
Operations: Refrigerants As of 1 January 2022, new commercial refrigeration equipment may not use refrigerants with a GWP of 150 or greater.
1480
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 1 / 32
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

4.1.1. Unmitigated

4.2. Energy

4.2.1. Electricity Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.2.3. Natural Gas Emissions By Land Use - Unmitigated

4.3. Area Emissions by Source
1481
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 2 / 32

4.3.2. Unmitigated

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated 1482
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 3 / 32

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.2. Architectural Coatings

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.14.1. Unmitigated

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment
1483
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 4 / 32

5.15.1. Unmitigated

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps

5.16.2. Process Boilers

5.17. User Defined

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores

6.3. Adjusted Climate Risk Scores

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures
1484
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 5 / 32

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores

7.2. Healthy Places Index Scores

7.3. Overall Health & Equity Scores

7.4. Health & Equity Measures

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard

8. User Changes to Default Data
1485
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 6 / 32

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 20.8
Location 34.06334566920109, -117.53410603073728
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Ontario
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5288
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas

27.0 1000sqft 0.79 27,034 7,253 0.00 — —
1486
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 7 / 32

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

2. Emissions Summary

2.4. Operations Emissions Compared Against Thresholds
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Un/Mit. TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 3.54 8.84 14.1 20.7 0.10 0.38 1.51 1.88 0.38 0.36 0.73 257 15,122 15,379 27.3 1.76 6,540 23,126 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 1.44 6.90 14.5 8.94 0.10 0.36 1.51 1.87 0.36 0.36 0.71 257 15,077 15,333 27.3 1.76 6,512 23,052 Average
Daily
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 2.57 8.15 11.5 15.2 0.08 0.34 1.10 1.44 0.33 0.26 0.59 257 12,532 12,789 27.1 1.38 6,521 20,397 Annual
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unmit. 0.47 1.49 2.10 2.78 0.01 0.06 0.20 0.26 0.06 0.05 0.11 42.5 2,075 2,117 4.48 0.23 1,080 3,377

2.5. Operations Emissions by Sector, Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Sector TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1487
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 8 / 32
Mobile 1.14 0.28 11.1 6.51 0.09 0.15 1.51 1.65 0.14 0.36 0.49 — 9,602 9,602 0.83 1.43 28.2 10,078 Area 2.09 8.40 0.10 11.8 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 48.3 48.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.8 Energy 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 5,060 5,060 0.46 0.03 — 5,079 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00 — 479 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
Total 3.54 8.84 14.1 20.7 0.10 0.38 1.51 1.88 0.38 0.36 0.73 257 15,122 15,379 27.3 1.76 6,540 23,126 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 1.13 0.27 11.6 6.53 0.09 0.15 1.51 1.65 0.14 0.36 0.49 — 9,604 9,604 0.83 1.44 0.73 10,054 Area — 6.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Energy 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 5,060 5,060 0.46 0.03 — 5,079 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00 — 479 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
Total 1.44 6.90 14.5 8.94 0.10 0.36 1.51 1.87 0.36 0.36 0.71 257 15,077 15,333 27.3 1.76 6,512 23,052 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.83 0.20 8.57 4.76 0.06 0.11 1.10 1.21 0.10 0.26 0.36 — 7,027 7,027 0.60 1.05 8.91 7,364 Area 1.43 7.79 0.07 8.05 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 33.1 33.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 34.1 Energy 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 5,060 5,060 0.46 0.03 — 5,079 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00 — 479 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
Total 2.57 8.15 11.5 15.2 0.08 0.34 1.10 1.44 0.33 0.26 0.59 257 12,532 12,789 27.1 1.38 6,521 20,397 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Mobile 0.15 0.04 1.56 0.87 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.22 0.02 0.05 0.07 — 1,163 1,163 0.10 0.17 1.47 1,219 Area 0.26 1.42 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.48 5.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.641488 IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 9 / 32
Energy 0.06 0.03 0.52 0.44 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 838 838 0.08 < 0.005 — 841 Water — — — — — — — — — — — 19.8 68.3 88.1 2.04 0.05 — 154 Waste — — — — — — — — — — — 22.7 0.00 22.7 2.27 0.00 — 79.3 Refrig. — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,078 1,078
Total 0.47 1.49 2.10 2.78 0.01 0.06 0.20 0.26 0.06 0.05 0.11 42.5 2,075 2,117 4.48 0.23 1,080 3,377

4. Operations Emissions Details

4.1. Mobile Emissions by Land Use

1.00 0.24 9.79 5.66 0.08 0.13 0.65 0.77 0.12 0.21 0.33 — 8,521 8,521 0.73 1.28 24.4 8,945 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.14 0.05 1.32 0.85 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.11 0.02 0.03 0.05 — 1,080 1,080 0.09 0.15 3.82 1,133 Total 1.14 0.28 11.1 6.51 0.09 0.15 0.74 0.88 0.14 0.24 0.38 — 9,602 9,602 0.83 1.43 28.2 10,078 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1489
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 10 / 32
Unrefrige 0.99 0.23 10.2 5.68 0.08 0.13 0.65 0.77 0.12 0.21 0.33 — 8,523 8,523 0.73 1.28 0.63 8,924 rated
Warehou
Rail
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.14 0.04 1.38 0.85 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.11 0.02 0.03 0.05 — 1,081 1,081 0.09 0.16 0.10 1,129 Total 1.13 0.27 11.6 6.53 0.09 0.15 0.74 0.88 0.14 0.24 0.38 — 9,604 9,604 0.83 1.44 0.73 10,054 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.13 0.03 1.38 0.76 0.01 0.02 0.09 0.10 0.02 0.03 0.04 — 1,033 1,033 0.09 0.16 1.28 1,082 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.02 0.01 0.19 0.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 — 131 131 0.01 0.02 0.20 137 Total 0.15 0.04 1.56 0.87 0.01 0.02 0.10 0.12 0.02 0.03 0.05 — 1,163 1,163 0.10 0.17 1.47 1,219

4.2. Energy

0.27 0.14 2.48 2.09 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.19 — 0.19 — 2,965 2,965 0.26 0.01 — 2,973 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 456 456 0.04 < 0.005 — 458 Total 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 3,421 3,421 0.30 0.01 — 3,431 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.27 0.14 2.48 2.09 0.01 0.19 — 0.19 0.19 — 0.19 — 2,965 2,965 0.26 0.01 — 2,973 Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.04 0.02 0.38 0.32 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 456 456 0.04 < 0.005 — 458 Total 0.32 0.16 2.87 2.41 0.02 0.22 — 0.22 0.22 — 0.22 — 3,421 3,421 0.30 0.01 — 3,431 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1492
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 13 / 32
Unrefrige 0.05 0.02 0.45 0.38 < 0.005 0.03 — 0.03 0.03 — 0.03 — 491 491 0.04 < 0.005 — 492 rated
Warehou
se-No
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail

0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.06 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 75.6 75.6 0.01 < 0.005 — 75.8 Total 0.06 0.03 0.52 0.44 < 0.005 0.04 — 0.04 0.04 — 0.04 — 566 566 0.05 < 0.005 — 568

4.3. Area Emissions by Source

4.3.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Source TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 5.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

2.09 1.93 0.10 11.8 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 48.3 48.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.8 Total 2.09 8.40 0.10 11.8 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 48.3 48.3 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 49.8 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1493
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 14 / 32
Consum — 5.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
er
Products
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — 6.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Consum
er
Products
— 1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Architect
ural
Coatings
— 0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Landsca
pe
Equipme
nt

0.26 0.24 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.48 5.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.64 Total 0.26 1.42 0.01 1.47 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 5.48 5.48 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.64

4.4. Water Emissions by Land Use

4.4.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 108 371 479 11.1 0.27 — 836
1494
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 15 / 32
Refrigera
Warehouse-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.0 41.2 53.2 1.23 0.03 — 92.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 108 371 479 11.1 0.27 — 836
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 12.0 41.2 53.2 1.23 0.03 — 92.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 120 412 532 12.3 0.30 — 929 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 17.8 61.4 79.3 1.84 0.04 — 138
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 1.98 6.83 8.81 0.20 < 0.005 — 15.4 Total — — — — — — — — — — — 19.8 68.3 88.1 2.04 0.05 — 154

4.5. Waste Emissions by Land Use

4.5.2. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) 1495
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 16 / 32
Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 123 0.00 123 12.3 0.00 — 431
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.7 0.00 13.7 1.37 0.00 — 47.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00 — 479 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 123 0.00 123 12.3 0.00 — 431
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 13.7 0.00 13.7 1.37 0.00 — 47.9
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 137 0.00 137 13.7 0.00 — 479 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — 20.4 0.00 20.4 2.04 0.00 — 71.4
1496
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 17 / 32
Refrigera — — — — — — — — — — — 2.27 0.00 2.27 0.23 0.00 — 7.93 ted
Total — — — — — — — — — — — 22.7 0.00 22.7 2.27 0.00 — 79.3

4.6. Refrigerant Emissions by Land Use

4.6.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,484 6,484
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 27.6 27.6
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,484 6,484
1497
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 18 / 32
Refrigera — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 27.6 27.6
ted
Warehou
se-No
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 6,512 6,512
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Unrefrige
rated
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,074 1,074
Refrigera
ted
Warehou
se-No
Rail
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 4.56 4.56
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,078 1,078

4.7. Offroad Emissions By Equipment Type

4.7.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1498
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 19 / 32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.8. Stationary Emissions By Equipment Type

4.8.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.9. User Defined Emissions By Equipment Type

4.9.1. Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Equipme
nt
Type
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1499
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 20 / 32
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type

4.10.1. Soil Carbon Accumulation By Vegetation Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Vegetatio
n
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.2. Above and Belowground Carbon Accumulation by Land Use Type - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Land
Use
TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1500
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 21 / 32
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Total — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

4.10.3. Avoided and Sequestered Emissions by Species - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Species TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —1501
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 22 / 32
Remove — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Avoided — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Sequest
ered
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Remove
d
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Subtotal — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —

5. Activity Data

5.9. Operational Mobile Sources

5.9.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Type Trips/Weekday Trips/Saturday Trips/Sunday Trips/Year VMT/Weekday VMT/Saturday VMT/Sunday VMT/Year Unrefrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail
145 12.7 5.08 38,611 2,893 254 102 772,662
Refrigerated
Warehouse-No Rail

21.8 1.84 0.74 5,813 413 34.9 14.0 110,224

5.10. Operational Area Sources

5.10.1. Hearths
1502
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 23 / 32

5.10.1.1. Unmitigated

5.10.3. Landscape Equipment
Season Unit Value
Snow Days day/yr 0.00
Summer Days day/yr 250

5.11. Operational Energy Consumption

5.11.1. Unmitigated
Electricity (kWh/yr) and CO2 and CH4 and N2O and Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Land Use Electricity (kWh/yr) CO2 CH4 N2O Natural Gas (kBTU/yr) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No
Rail
1,123,744 349 0.0330 0.0040 4,625,355
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 591,921 349 0.0330 0.0040 712,190

5.12. Operational Water and Wastewater Consumption

5.12.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Indoor Water (gal/year) Outdoor Water (gal/year) Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 56,263,819 1,048,248
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 6,251,613 116,472
1503
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 24 / 32

5.13. Operational Waste Generation

5.13.1. Unmitigated
Land Use Waste (ton/year) Cogeneration (kWh/year)
Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 229 0.00
Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 25.4 0.00

5.14. Operational Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Equipment

5.15. Operational Off-Road Equipment

5.15.1. Unmitigated
Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor

5.16. Stationary Sources

5.16.1. Emergency Generators and Fire Pumps
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number per Day Hours per Day Hours per Year Horsepower Load Factor

5.16.2. Process Boilers
1504
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 25 / 32
Equipment Type Fuel Type Number Boiler Rating (MMBtu/hr) Daily Heat Input (MMBtu/day) Annual Heat Input (MMBtu/yr)

5.17. User Defined
Equipment Type Fuel Type
— —

5.18. Vegetation

5.18.1. Land Use Change

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Vegetation Land Use Type Vegetation Soil Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.1. Biomass Cover Type

5.18.1.1. Unmitigated
Biomass Cover Type Initial Acres Final Acres

5.18.2. Sequestration

5.18.2.1. Unmitigated
Tree Type Number Electricity Saved (kWh/year) Natural Gas Saved (btu/year)

6. Climate Risk Detailed Report

6.1. Climate Risk Summary
1505
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 26 / 32
Cal-Adapt midcentury 2040–2059 average projections for four hazards are reported below for your project location. These are under Representation Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5 which assumes GHG emissions will continue to rise strongly through 2050 and then plateau around 2100.

6.2. Initial Climate Risk Scores
Climate Hazard Exposure Score Sensitivity Score Adaptive Capacity Score Vulnerability Score Temperature and Extreme Heat N/A N/A N/A N/A
Extreme Precipitation N/A N/A N/A N/A
Sea Level Rise N/A N/A N/A N/A
Wildfire N/A N/A N/A N/A
Flooding N/A N/A N/A N/A
Drought N/A N/A N/A N/A
Snowpack N/A N/A N/A N/A
Air Quality N/A N/A N/A N/A
The sensitivity score reflects the extent to which a project would be adversely affected by exposure to a climate hazard. Exposure is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest exposure.
1506
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 27 / 32
The adaptive capacity of a project refers to its ability to manage and reduce vulnerabilities from projected climate hazards. Adaptive capacity is rated on a scale of 1 to 5, with a score of 5 representing the greatest ability to adapt.

The overall vulnerability scores are calculated based on the potential impacts and adaptive capacity assessments for each hazard. Scores include implementation of climate risk reduction measures.

6.4. Climate Risk Reduction Measures

7. Health and Equity Details

7.1. CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Scores
The maximum CalEnviroScreen score is 100. A high score (i.e., greater than 50) reflects a higher pollution burden compared to other census tracts in the state.

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Exposure Indicators —
AQ-Ozone 91.1
AQ-PM 95.7
AQ-DPM 96.6 1507
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 28 / 32
Drinking Water 93.3
Lead Risk Housing 8.61
Pesticides 0.00
Toxic Releases 78.9
Traffic 89.1
Effect Indicators —
CleanUp Sites 0.00
Groundwater 30.9
Haz Waste Facilities/Generators 78.8
Impaired Water Bodies 0.00
Solid Waste 70.4
Sensitive Population —
Asthma 47.3
Cardio-vascular 67.3
Low Birth Weights 57.1
Socioeconomic Factor Indicators —
Education 40.5
Housing 32.3
Linguistic 18.1
Poverty 23.9
Unemployment 53.9

Indicator Result for Project Census Tract
Economic —
Above Poverty 76.78686
1508
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 29 / 32
Employed 63.51854228
Education—
Bachelor's or higher 44.59129988
High school enrollment 3.977928911
Preschool enrollment 15.60374695
Transportation—
Auto Access 88.68215065
Active commuting 10.11163865
Social—
2-parent households 11.86962659
Voting 50.91749006
Neighborhood—
Alcohol availability 69.3314513
Park access 61.63223406
Retail density 69.31861927
Supermarket access 2.399589375
Tree canopy 29.69331451
Housing—
Homeownership 78.81432054
Housing habitability 80.20017965
Low-inc homeowner severe housing cost burden 88.74631079 Low-inc renter severe housing cost burden 37.86731682
Uncrowded housing 60.77248813
Health Outcomes—
Insured adults 67.2783267
Arthritis 74.6
Asthma ER Admissions 54.3
1509
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 30 / 32
High Blood Pressure 79.9
Cancer (excluding skin) 68.9
Asthma 49.0
Coronary Heart Disease 85.5
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 74.0
Diagnosed Diabetes 64.3
Life Expectancy at Birth 52.5
Cognitively Disabled 87.2
Physically Disabled 77.4
Heart Attack ER Admissions 10.4
Mental Health Not Good 50.5
Chronic Kidney Disease 79.8
Obesity 43.5
Pedestrian Injuries 99.0
Physical Health Not Good 58.2
Stroke 80.6
Health Risk Behaviors—
Binge Drinking 19.3
Current Smoker 53.5
No Leisure Time for Physical Activity 61.3
Climate Change Exposures—
Wildfire Risk 0.0
SLR Inundation Area 0.0
Children 32.5
Elderly 84.2
English Speaking 91.4
Foreign-born 35.9
1510
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 31 / 32
Outdoor Workers 45.5
Climate Change Adaptive Capacity —
Impervious Surface Cover 76.5
Traffic Density 89.2
Traffic Access 46.3
Other Indices —
Hardship 44.0
Other Decision Support —
2016 Voting 74.5

7.4. Health & Equity Measures
No Health & Equity Measures selected.

7.5. Evaluation Scorecard
Health and Equity Evaluation Scorecard not completed.

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
1511
IE Distribution Center #14 (Truck Operations) Detailed Report, 8/18/2022 32 / 32
Land Use Total Project Area (without Parking and Other Asphalt Surfaces) is 7.87 acres Operations: Vehicle Data Trip rates based on information provided in ITE 11th Edition Operations: Fleet Mix Truck Mix based on SCAQMD recommended truck mix Operations: Refrigerants As of 1 January 2022, new commercial refrigeration equipment may not use refrigerants with a GWP of 150 or greater.
1512
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
1513
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
APPENDIX 5.3:

EMFAC2021
1514
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2023
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/year for CVMT and EVMT, trips/year for Trips, kWh/year for Energy Consumption, tons/year for Emissions, 1000 gallons/year for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Fuel_Consumption Fuel_Consumption Total Fuel VMT Total VMT Miles per Gallon Vehicle Class San Bernardino (SC) 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 7.139920774 72989.87996 20.21856385 20218.56385 99151757.36 72989.87996 589074824.8 5.94 HHDT San Bernardino (SC) 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 13684.27912 540336552.4 91207.74228 91207742.28 540336552.4 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 11.071794 215446.3538 0 0 215446.3538 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2370.144029 48449836.15 7923.79652 7923796.52 48449836.15 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 461483.7292 7017524717 240236.635 240236635 244016564.2 7017524717 7487517958 30.68 LDA San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1109.597168 14054225.57 328.8623383 328862.3383 14054225.57 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 15706.1209 253061679.4 0 0 253061679.4 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 11324.38067 202877335.8 3451.066904 3451066.904 202877335.8 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 41702.74967 497957156.2 20670.57095 20670570.95 20682315.81 497957156.2 499223706.1 24.14 LDT1 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11.94633759 62720.48759 2.576524841 2576.524841 62720.48759 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 40.25061846 615040.0246 0 0 615040.0246 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 32.95928492 588789.4236 9.168334976 9168.334976 588789.4236 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 187695.2776 2666362554 113026.4187 113026418.7 113612136.3 2666362554 2706014469 23.82 LDT2 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 481.5963709 7444176.325 228.9034375 228903.4375 7444176.325 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 809.1431596 10220716.39 0 0 10220716.39 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1266.994818 21987022.61 356.8141273 356814.1273 21987022.61 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 17369.10468 208190922.4 15725.14829 15725148.29 22649955.03 208190922.4 350031821.2 15.45 LHDT1 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11340.4221 141840898.9 6924.806743 6924806.743 141840898.9 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2940.213764 34218739.32 2893.121173 2893121.173 6421373.81 34218739.32 94438257.25 14.71 LHDT2 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4748.518724 60219517.93 3528.252637 3528252.637 60219517.93 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20689.98168 42836654.11 1024.529799 1024529.799 1024529.799 42836654.11 42836654.11 41.81 MCY San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 147303.3129 2011093605 104722.9308 104722930.8 106121590.4 2011093605 2063737500 19.45 MDV San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1912.856517 27101379.22 1153.981539 1153981.539 27101379.22 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 883.4710394 11157327.81 0 0 11157327.81 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 823.221551 14385188.28 244.6781301 244678.1301 14385188.28 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3595.119651 10460741.91 2131.45052 2131450.52 2521132.488 10460741.91 14451897.96 5.73 MH San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1340.055605 3991156.05 389.6819685 389681.9685 3991156.05 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1500.364507 26043135.77 5038.733349 5038733.349 27656121.37 26043135.77 228746120.4 8.27 MHDT San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14608.25407 199805820.7 22288.42278 22288422.78 199805820.7 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 9.224784632 63608.15122 0 0 63608.15122 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 184.1702325 2833555.784 328.9652465 328965.2465 2833555.784 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 384.9686335 5415956.324 1063.297516 1063297.516 1724023.258 5415956.324 10403786.09 6.03 OBUS San Bernardino (SC) 2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 208.3404962 4425212.016 597.3315243 597331.5243 4425212.016 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 31.52138873 562617.7521 63.3942171 63394.2171 562617.7521 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 294.5939953 4514535.962 505.0559552 505055.9552 1611072.188 4514535.962 10332913.93 6.41 SBUS San Bernardino (SC) 2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 382.1050011 2616781.695 356.3903036 356390.3036 2616781.695 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.69336851 2637.406802 0 0 2637.406802 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 385.616886 3198958.869 749.6259288 749625.9288 3198958.869 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 54.60967225 1714542.424 140.3696548 140369.6548 2776335.306 1714542.424 13093887.88 4.72 UBUS San Bernardino (SC) 2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.556959009 147096.8417 14.11747797 14117.47797 147096.8417 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.433186591 14102.7389 0 0 14102.7389 San Bernardino (SC) 2023 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 249.7401785 11218145.87 2621.848173 2621848.173 11218145.87 1515
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2024
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/year for CVMT and EVMT, trips/year for Trips, kWh/year for Energy Consumption, tons/year for Emissions, 1000 gallons/year for Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT Fuel_Consumption Fuel_Consumption Total Fuel VMT Total VMT Miles per Gallon Vehicle Class San Bernardino (SC) 2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 5.565987525 65632.20065 17.55506745 17555.06745 100020707.1 65632.20065 602650321.4 6.03 HHDT San Bernardino (SC) 2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14231.95658 551042326.4 92002.9329 92002932.9 551042326.4 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 48.62871821 1514395.863 0 0 1514395.863 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 HHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 2469.470738 50027966.96 8000.219124 8000219.124 50027966.96 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 459317.1397 6998203711 235268.3364 235268336.4 239249877 6998203711 7553967064 31.57 LDA San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1047.589492 13077704.42 304.6940031 304694.0031 13077704.42 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 19287.2826 319989461.8 0 0 319989461.8 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDA Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 12500.45848 222696187.4 3676.846561 3676846.561 222696187.4 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 40725.35771 490115573.8 19992.18901 19992189.01 20008289.61 490115573.8 492044217.3 24.59 LDT1 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 10.72175816 55107.22369 2.270239442 2270.239442 55107.22369 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 58.29951204 952224.2422 0 0 952224.2422 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 51.79076029 921312.0144 13.83036618 13830.36618 921312.0144 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 192654.7494 2757561092 113913.4167 113913416.7 114588210.3 2757561092 2808082925 24.51 LDT2 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 520.896721 8078084.967 243.685157 243685.157 8078084.967 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1199.246991 15005145.59 0 0 15005145.59 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1594.625518 27438602.16 431.1084869 431108.4869 27438602.16 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 17179.49082 208481689.1 15346.53488 15346534.88 22275281.21 208481689.1 352257356.3 15.81 LHDT1 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 11382.09786 142493007.5 6928.746332 6928746.332 142493007.5 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LHDT1 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 52.7403112 1282659.757 0 0 1282659.757 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 2883.702401 33531637.34 2787.053647 2787053.647 6339312.387 33531637.34 94885856.62 14.97 LHDT2 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4825.532255 61039665.72 3552.258741 3552258.741 61039665.72 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 LHDT2 Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 13.65084178 314553.5538 0 0 314553.5538 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MCY Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 20751.92893 42918713.78 1022.38967 1022389.67 1022389.67 42918713.78 42918713.78 41.98 MCY San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 147141.1277 2023247300 102986.2138 102986213.8 104408638.9 2023247300 2084683084 19.97 MDV San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1910.88318 26864024.48 1129.452064 1129452.064 26864024.48 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 1327.48959 16604056.61 0 0 16604056.61 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MDV Aggregate Aggregate Plug-in Hybrid 1028.690257 17967703.21 292.9729803 292972.9803 17967703.21 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 3401.970527 9880592.437 2022.448199 2022448.199 2408282.462 9880592.437 13826961.78 5.74 MH San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MH Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 1336.39751 3946369.345 385.834263 385834.263 3946369.345 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 1460.602089 25635396.94 4923.389143 4923389.143 27935606.17 25635396.94 232314319.3 8.32 MHDT San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 14946.4736 202976493.9 22669.39063 22669390.63 202976493.9 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 46.13645649 737631.427 0 0 737631.427 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 MHDT Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 195.6757264 2964797.055 342.8264 342826.4 2964797.055 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 370.0192137 5168863.655 1012.113043 1012113.043 1678725.582 5168863.655 10209810.25 6.08 OBUS San Bernardino (SC) 2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 210.5519789 4437514.629 600.0645542 600064.5542 4437514.629 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 0.809761934 21328.84548 0 0 21328.84548 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 OBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 32.78528924 582103.1254 66.54798496 66547.98496 582103.1254 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 297.8692006 4585227.496 511.4311108 511431.1108 1619236.79 4585227.496 10410441.24 6.43 SBUS San Bernardino (SC) 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 373.2941498 2533365.656 344.1451415 344145.1415 2533365.656 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 2.213199982 18416.70512 0 0 18416.70512 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 SBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 398.7600331 3273431.384 763.6605376 763660.5376 3273431.384 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Gasoline 54.72012078 1718010.1 132.909217 132909.217 2702138.875 1718010.1 13120370.38 4.86 UBUS San Bernardino (SC) 2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Diesel 4.556959009 147096.8417 14.21429006 14214.29006 147096.8417 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Electricity 7.328344802 363414.4038 0 0 363414.4038 San Bernardino (SC) 2024 UBUS Aggregate Aggregate Natural Gas 243.3602145 10891849.03 2555.015368 2555015.368 10891849.03 1516
5355 East Airport Drive Energy Analysis
14539-03 EA Report
This page intentionally left blank
1517

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

PROPOSED WAREHOUSE
5355 East Airport Drive
Ontario, California
for
Prologis
1518
22885 Savi Ranch Parkway  Suite E  Yorba Linda  California  92887 voice: (714) 685-1115  fax: (714) 685-1118  www.socalgeo.com March 9, 2022
Prologis
17777 Center Court Drive North, Suite 100
Cerritos, California 90703
Attention: Mr. John Carter
Director, Project Management
Project No.: 22G128-1
Subject: Geotechnical Investigation
Proposed Warehouse
5355 East Airport Drive
Ontario, California
Dear Mr. Carter:

In accordance with your request, we have conducted a geotechnical investigation at the subject site. We are pleased to present this report summarizing the conclusions and recommendations developed from our investigation.

We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service on this project. We look forward to providing additional consulting services during the course of the project. If we may be of further assistance in any manner, please contact our office.

Respectfully Submitted,
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL, INC.

Joseph Lozano Leon
Staff Engineer
Robert G. Trazo, M.Sc., GE 2655
Principal Engineer
Distribution: (1) Addressee
1519
Proposed Warehouse – Ontario, CA
Project No. 22G128-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES 3

3.0 SITE AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4

3.1 Site Conditions 4

3.2 Proposed Development 4

4.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 6

4.1 Scope of Exploration/Sampling Methods 6

4.2 Geotechnical Conditions 6

5.0 LABORATORY TESTING 8

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 10

6.1 Seismic Design Considerations 10

6.2 Geotechnical Design Considerations 12

6.3 Site Grading Recommendations 14

6.4 Construction Considerations 18

6.5 Foundation Design and Construction 18

6.6 Floor Slab Design and Construction 20

6.7 Retaining Wall Design and Construction 21

6.8 Pavement Design Parameters 23

7.0 GENERAL COMMENTS 26

APPENDICES
A Plate 1: Site Location Map
Plate 2: Boring Location Plan
B Boring Logs
C Laboratory Test Results
D Grading Guide Specifications
E Seismic Design Parameters
1520
Proposed Warehouse– Ontario, CA
Project No. 22G128-1

Page 1 ends

Ontario City CouncilNovember 19, 2024

Ontario City Council
November 19, 2024