6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
We reviewed the Planning Commission Staff Report with the assistance of air quality expert Dr. James Clark.2
The Staff Report fails to meaningfully address the flaws in the Project’s environmental review. Regarding hazards, the FEIR identifies significant vapor intrusion impacts due to PCE contamination, but improperly defers formulation of mitigation measures. The FEIR also fails to analyze the full scope of the Project – CEQA requires that an EIR analyze the reasonably foreseeable consequences of the Project, but the Project’s FEIR fails to analyze the Project’s reasonably foreseeable use as a parcel hub (a use that generates more trips than analyzed), and fails to analyze reasonably foreseeable truck trips to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Regarding cumulative impacts, the Staff Report still fails to meaningfully respond to the legal authority requiring analysis of the Project’s impacts in the context of the numerous other warehouses existing and planned in the area. The Staff Report also fails to resolve flaws in the Project’s health risk assessment, which still underestimates impacts on sensitive receptors. Regarding energy, the Staff Report provides an analysis of factors in Appendix F the CEQA Guidelines. But the analysis is wholly inadequate because it fails to address applicable energy consumption measures and renewable energy options. As a result, the FEIR’s conclusions are not supported by substantial evidence. Rather, substantial evidence demonstrates that the Project’s significant impacts are greater than analyzed in the FEIR.
The Staff Report incorrectly concludes that the “final EIR contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project” and complies with CEQA.3 The Staff Report recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the final EIR and approve the Project’s Development Plan Application.4 These recommendations are unsupported by evidence in the record due to the major flaws in the Project’s environmental review.
CARE CA urges the Planning Commission to require the City revise and recirculate the EIR to comply with CEQA before any further action is taken on the Project.
I. STATEMENT OF INTEREST
CARE CA is an unincorporated association of individuals and labor organizations that may be adversely affected by the potential public and worker 2 Dr. Clark’s technical comments and curricula vitae are attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3 Staff Report, Item D - 2573 of 3296. 4 Staff Report, Item D - 1 of 3296.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4043
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
health and safety hazards, and the environmental impacts of the Project. The coalition includes Ontario residents Daniel Brewer, David Audelo, Carlos Mendez, Rober Rubio, the District Council of Ironworkers and Southern California Pipe Trades DC 16, along with their members, their families, and other individuals who live and work in Ontario and in San Bernardino County.
CARE CA advocates for protecting the environment and the health of their communities’ workforces. CARE CA seeks to ensure a sustainable construction industry over the long-term by supporting projects that offer genuine economic and employment benefits, and which minimize adverse environmental and other impacts on local communities. CARE CA members live, work, recreate, and raise their families in the City of Ontario and surrounding communities. Accordingly, they would be directly affected by the Project’s environmental and health and safety impacts. Individual members may also work on the Project itself. They will be first in line to be exposed to any health and safety hazards that exist onsite.
In addition, CARE CA has an interest in enforcing environmental laws that encourage sustainable development and ensure a safe working environment for its members. Environmentally detrimental projects can jeopardize future jobs by making it more difficult and more expensive for business and industry to expand in the region, and by making the area less desirable for new businesses and new residents. Indeed, continued environmental degradation can, and has, caused construction moratoriums and other restrictions on growth that, in turn, reduce future employment opportunities.
II. THE FEIR FAILS TO ADEQUATELY ANALYZE, QUANTIFY, AND MITIGATE THE PROJECT’S POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
A. The FEIR Improperly Defers Formulation of Mitigation Measures for Hazardous Materials
The FEIR’s Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment (“ESA”) identifies levels of tetrachloroethene (“PCE”) in soil vapor samples in excess of current commercial/industrial calculated soil gas screening levels (“SGSLs”).5 The ESA concludes that “PCE impacts potentially associated with the use and storage of hazardous materials at Building B could contribute to vapor intrusion conditions on the Site.”6 The FEIR identifies this contamination as a potentially significant impact.7 Additionally, the ethylbenzene concentration in one soil vapor sample 5 FEIR, Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment, pg. vii. 6 FEIR, Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment, pg. 11-2. 7 DEIR, pg. S-17.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4044
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
exceeded the calculated soil gas commercial/industrial screening level of 163 micrograms per cubic meter.8 The FEIR fails to disclose this significant impact in the body of the FEIR, in violation of CEQA.
The FEIR states that the potentially significant vapor intrusion impacts would be mitigated through imposition of Mitigation Measure (“MM”) 4.7-1. This measure requires future preparation of a Soil Management Plan (“SMP”). he SMP will include instructions for handling, storage, and disposal of any known or potentially impacted soil during soil moving activities. But MM 4.7-1 fails to explain how the PCE contamination at the Project site will actually be addressed – whether it will be remediated, capped in place, etc. – and the FEIR lacks a quantitative analysis of the construction impacts associated with that process. The measure states that contaminated soils will be monitored and provides guidance for proper soil handling, but does not specifically state that PCE-contaminated soil will be removed. Under MM 4.7-1, it is unclear if the City will remove PCE-contaminated soil or adopt passive/engineered vapor intrusion mitigation such as installing a vapor barrier or venting. Without clear performance standards and a quantitative analysis of the impacts of the PCE cleanup phase of construction, MM 4.7-1 remains incomplete and ineffective, and the FEIR’s construction impact analysis remains incomplete.
MM 4.7-1 improperly defers formulation of mitigation measures related to PCE contamination to a future date.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 states that formulation of mitigation measures shall not be deferred until some future time. The Guidelines permit an agency to develop the “specific details of a mitigation measure” after project approval “when it is impractical or infeasible to include those details during the project’s environmental review.”9 In such circumstances, deferral of mitigation details is permitted if the agency “(1) commits itself to the mitigation, (2) adopts specific performance standards the mitigation will achieve, and (3) identifies the type(s) of potential action(s) that can feasibly achieve that performance standard and that will [be] considered, analyzed, and potentially incorporated in the mitigation measure.”10 Compliance with a regulatory permit or other similar process may be identified as mitigation if compliance would result in implementation of measures that would be reasonably expected, based on 8 FEIR, Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment, pg. viii. 9 Guidelines, § 15126.4, subd. (a)(1)(B) (Section 15126.4). 10 Section 15126.4, subd. (a)(1)(B); see Save Our Capitol! v. Department of General Services (2022) 85 Cal.App.5th 1101, 1134 (Save Our Capitol!).)
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4045
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
substantial evidence in the record, to reduce the significant impact to the specified performance standards.11
Here, the FEIR defers formulation of the PCE mitigation until after Project approval. But the City fails to present any evidence that it would be impractical or infeasible to do so during the Project’s environmental review. Based on the evidence before the City, it should be feasible to require and formulate vapor intrusion mitigation. Even if deferral of formulation of mitigation were reasonable in this case, MM 4.7-1 fails to adopt specific performance standards for remediating PCE contamination and the associated vapor intrusion risks. MM 4.7-1 also fails to clearly identify the types of potential actions that may be taken to mitigate the vapor intrusion risk. Thus, the City improperly defers formulation of PCE contamination and vapor intrusion mitigation.
The City also improperly defers formulation of mitigation for the ethylbenzene contamination. As with the PCE contamination, MM 4.7-1 fails to substantiate how this contaminant will be addressed. The FEIR contains no evidence that formulation of mitigation for ethylbenzene contamination is impractical or infeasible, identifies no performance standards, and fails to identify potential mitigation measures. Mitigation for this impact is thus improperly deferred.
B. The City Still Fails to Adequately Evaluate Trips Generated by the Project
CARE CA’s comments on the FEIR showed that the Project’s size and number of parking spots would enable it to be used as a High Cube Parcel Hub Warehouse, which has a trip generation rate 2.6 times the rate used in the FEIR. In Response 1-8, the City reiterates its position that analyzing the Project as a combination of the “Warehousing” and “High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse” land uses is reasonable due to the Project’s anticipated use and size.12 The City’s response ignores that an EIR must analyze reasonably foreseeable consequences of a Project. Public Resources Code Section 21065 provides, in part:
“‘Project’ means an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.”13 Here, the Project proposes a 270,337-square-foot industrial 11 Id. 12 Staff Report, Item D - 2466 of 3296; FEIR, pg. 2-39. 13 See Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4046
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
building with a proposed height of 46 feet on 13.08 acres of land. A high-cube parcel hub warehouse is a reasonably foreseeable use of this project because “high-cube parcel hub warehouse” is defined in Institute of Transportation Engineers (“ITE”) land use code 156 as a building that typically has at least 200,000 gross square feet of floor area, has a ceiling height of 24 feet or more, and is used primarily for the storage and/ or consolidation of manufactured goods prior to their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. And Mr. Marshall’s comments on the FEIR demonstrate that the Project site includes adequate parking to support this use.
Even if less-intensive warehouse uses are possible for this Project (such as the FEIR’s combination of “Warehousing” and “High-Cube Cold Storage Warehouse”), use as a high-cube parcel hub warehouse is a reasonably foreseeable outcome that must be analyzed.
The City’s claim that the Project’s “anticipated use” does not include a highcube parcel hub warehouse is irrelevant to the analysis. Courts have held that in this situation, “the identity of a tenant is irrelevant to CEQA review.”14 The court in Maintain Our Desert Environment v. Town of Apple Valley explained that “land use entitlements such as conditional use permits and development approvals run with the land and do not belong to the permittee…. had [the developer] developed the Project and then held it out for sale to any interested buyer, no additional CEQA review would have been necessary for the new owner so long as the use was consistent with that that had already been approved.”15 Here, the project that is the subject of the FEIR is a Development Plan to develop an industrial building totaling 270,337 square feet of gross floor area on 13.08 acres and having a FAR of 0.47.
This building could be used as a high-cube parcel hub warehouse, so this level of use must be analyzed in the FEIR.
C. The FEIR Still Fails to Adequately Disclose, Analyze and Mitigate the Project’s Cumulative Impacts
CARE CA commented that the FEIR’s analysis of cumulative impacts is inadequate because it fails to consider the cumulative impacts of past, present, and probable future projects. The City’s approach to cumulative impacts, relying on South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) guidance, is that emissions of criteria air pollutants or toxic air contaminants that do not exceed individual project thresholds are also not cumulatively considerable.16 CARE CA’s 14 Am. Canyon Cmty. United for Responsible Growth v. City of Am. Canyon (2006) 145 Cal. App. 4th 1062, 1074 (citing Maintain Our Desert Environment v. Town of Apple Valley (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 430, 443–449)). 15 Maintain Our Desert Environment v. Town of Apple Valley, supra, 124 Cal.App.4th at 444. 16 DEIR, Appendix B, pg. 53.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4047
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
comments provided a discussion of the controlling caselaw,17 the Attorney General’s recent litigation on this issue in People of the State of California v. City of Fontana,18 and pending updates to the SCAQMD significance thresholds for cumulative impacts in response to this litigation. These authorities explain that the City’s “drop in the bucket” approach to cumulative impacts does not comply with CEQA.
In Responses 1-10 and 1-11, the Staff Report states: “[t]he commenter is again advised that the SCAQMD is the regulatory authority on air quality charged with the responsibility of ensuring the improvement of air quality in the South Coast Air Basin… The commenter speculates on ‘updated thresholds’ for air quality impacts. Absent these ‘updated thresholds’ the EIR properly evaluates air quality impacts in the context of existing thresholds, protocols, and methodologies.”19 The Staff Report and the FEIR continue to fail to address any of the controlling legal authority on this issue raised in CARE CA’s comments. The court in Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Dept. of Forestry Fire Protection stated: "[w]e review an agency's decision regarding the inclusion of information in the cumulative impacts analysis under an abuse of discretion standard. ‘The primary determination is whether it was reasonable and practical to include the projects and whether, without their inclusion, the severity and significance of the cumulative impacts were reflected adequately.’”20 CARE CA’s comments demonstrate that the SCAQMD individual project significance threshold fail to reflect the significance of cumulative air quality and public health impacts in areas burdened by extensive warehouse development – this Project would add a substantial number of diesel truck trips to routes in an area with a high existing background MATES cancer risk, combining with the emissions of trucks from numerous other warehouses. Analysis of cumulative impacts from past, present, and probable future warehouse projects is feasible. As an example, Dr. Clark’s comments present data from Pitzer College’s Warehouse CITY tool, which maps existing and proposed warehouses in Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties.21 The tool measures metrics including acreage, square footage, and diesel particulate matter and carbon emissions.22
17 Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal. App. 3d 692; Env't Prot. Info. Ctr. v.
California Dep't of Forestry & Fire Prot. (2008) 44 Cal. 4th 459; 18 San Bernardino Superior Court, Case No. CIVSB2121829; SCAQMD Working Group Meeting # 4, Cumulative Impacts from Air Toxics for CEQA Projects (June 6, 2023) pg. 6; 19 Staff Report, Item D - 2467 of 3296. 20 Id. at 525 (citing Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692, 723. 21 Available at https://www.pitzer.edu/redfordconservancy/mapping-data-visualization/. 22 Id.; Clark, pg. 7.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4048
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
The Staff Report’s statement that CARE CA speculates as to “updated thresholds” is erroneous because CARE CA’s comments link directly to the materials for SCAQMD’s working group meetings – these materials discuss updates to the thresholds.23 The Staff Report’s failure to discuss SCAQMD’s pending updates is inconsistent with the Staff Report’s statement that SCAQMD is the regulatory authority on air quality. In sum, the City’s rote application of SCAQMD significance thresholds without analysis of the context in which the Project is being proposed fails to satisfy the analytical and informational requirements of CEQA.
D. The FEIR’s Quantified Health Risk Analysis Underestimates Impacts
CARE CA’s comments on the FEIR identify flaws in the City’s Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment (“HRA”) that underestimate health risk impacts on residential and non-residential (worker) receptors in the vicinity of the Project. In Responses 1-12 and 1-13, the Staff Report disputes these flaws. The Staff Report maintains that “[a]ny variant in interpretation of OEHHA guidance such as is suggested by the commenter would not materially affect the EIR health risk significance conclusions” because “the Project site is surrounded by industrial uses and the nearest sensitive receptor locations are short-term stay hotels located on the opposite side of freeways with the closest being approximately 3/4-mile from the Project site.”24
The Staff Report’s statement regarding distance from sensitive receptors ignores that the Project would generate truck trips impacting sensitive receptors along the City’s designated truck routes.25 The Project’s primary truck routes would depend on the Project’s future uses. Despite uncertainty regarding the Project’s future tenants, the HRA makes an unsubstantiated assumption regarding the Project’s primary truck route, shown in the exhibit below.26 23 SCAQMD, CEQA Policy Development, https://www.aqmd.gov/home/rules-compliance/ceqa/ceqapolicy-development-(new); SCAQMD Working Group Meeting # 4, Cumulative Impacts from Air Toxics for CEQA Projects (June 6, 2023) https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/documents/wgm-4_20230602_final.pdf?sfvrsn=16; SCAQMD Working Group Meeting #5, Cumulative Impacts from Air Toxics for CEQA Projects (March 20, 2024) https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/documents/wgm-5-20240320-final.pdf?sfvrsn=20. 24 Staff Report, Item D – 2468-9 of 3296. 25 The Ontario Plan, Mobility Element, Figure M-04, https://www.ontarioca.gov/sites/default/files/OntarioFiles/Planning/The%20Ontario%20Plann/Mobility/FIgure%20M-04%20Truck%20Routes.pdf. 26 FEIR, HRA Report, Exhibit 2-C.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4049
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
The HRA only analyzes trucks travelling east along Airport Drive, away from sensitive receptors located west of the Project. Trucks could easily travel west on Airport Drive and north along Milliken Avenue, which are both City-designated truck routes.27 Sensitive receptors including Receptor R6 are located off Milliken Avenue, and could thus be impacted by cumulative truck trips from this Project and other warehouses. The HRA’s assumption that trucks would not travel west along Airport Drive underestimates impacts. A revised HRA must be prepared.
E. The FEIR Still Underestimates Truck Trip Lengths and Resultant Impacts
CARE CA commented that the FEIR underestimates truck trip lengths by failing to account for the Project’s distance to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. CARE CA presented numerous comment letters from SCAQMD 27 The Ontario Plan, Mobility Element, Figure M-04,
https://www.ontarioca.gov/sites/default/files/OntarioFiles/Planning/The%20Ontario%20Plann/Mobility/FIgure%20M-04%20Truck%20Routes.pdf; Clark Comments, pg. 5.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4050
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
recommending analysis of trips to the Ports, and presented evidence showing that trips to the Ports are a reasonably foreseeable consequence for a warehouse in the City of Ontario. In Response 1-16, the Staff Report states:
The commenter states that the Final EIR misinterprets the SCAQMD’s guidance and provides examples of previous SCAQMD comments on other, unrelated warehouse projects alleging that the Project’s truck trip length assumptions are not supported by substantial evidence. As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.0, Project Description, the Project is proposed as a speculative development and the user(s) of the building is not known at this time (refer to Draft EIR p. 3-13). It is unknown and speculative at this time whether trucks serving the Project would travel to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach as a trip origin or designation, given the complexities of supply chain routing and transportation geography. As stated in Response to Comment A-18 in the Final EIR, the trip lengths were derived by weighting the average trip lengths using traffic trip percentages.
The Staff Report apparently dismisses the SCAQMD comments as inapplicable without providing any evidence demonstrating that the Project’s truck trips would be limited to the local 40-mile average trip lengths analyzed in the FEIR, and without considering the additional guidance from SCAQMD contained in the letters which explains that truck trips to and from the ports should be analyzed.
Many of the SCAQMD letters recommending consideration of the distance to the Ports were in regard to “spec” warehouses with unknown tenants, just like the Project.28 The Staff Report and the FEIR’s responses fail to respond to this guidance with good faith, reasoned analysis,29 and still fail to provide any evidence demonstrating that goods brought in and out of the Project’s warehouses would primarily come from short-distance truck trips.
The Staff Report’s statement that it is speculative to assume trucks may travel to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach also misstates the applicable legal standard. The City’s response ignores that an EIR must analyze reasonably foreseeable consequences of a Project. Public Resources Code Section 21065 provides, in part: “‘Project’ means an activity which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical 28 SCAQMD, Comments on Notice of Availability of a Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Rubidoux Commerce Park Project (Proposed Project) (SCH No. 2020110449) (October 9, 2023), available at https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/commentletters/2023/october-2023/RVC230901-01.pdf (“the future tenant(s) of the building is not known”). 29 CEQA Guidelines, Section 15088 requires “good faith, reasoned analysis in response… Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information will not suffice.” The level of detail contained in the response may correspond to the level of detail provided in the comment.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4051
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
change in the environment.”30 Here, the Project proposes a 270,337-square-foot industrial building with a proposed height of 46 feet on 13.08 acres of land. CARE CA’s comments contain evidence showing that trips to the Ports are a reasonably foreseeable outcome of a warehouse like this (citing to the massive volume of goods moving to and from the Ports, and recommendations from SCAQMD).31 In light of this evidence, the City’s assumption that trucks would not travel to the Ports is speculative, unsupported by substantial evidence, and is a failure to analyze a reasonably foreseeable use permitted by the Development Plan.
This letter contains additional substantial evidence showing that trips to the Ports are reasonably foreseeable. The National Center for Sustainable Transportation (“NCST”), sponsored by the California Department of Transportation, prepared a research report titled “Warehousing and Distribution Center Facilities in Southern California: The Use of the Commodity Flow Survey Data to Identify Logistics Sprawl and Freight Generation Patterns” in 2017.32 The report analyzed Southern California Association of Governments (“SCAG”) data on warehouses in the six counties that comprise the SCAG region (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura). The report finds that 56% of the facilities in the SCAG region receive goods from the Port of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and around 50% deliver to Southern California warehouses, retail stores or manufacturing plants.33 This data suggests that trips to the Ports are reasonably foreseeable, and that it would be speculative not to account for distance to the Ports.
In June 2014, SCAQMD staff conducted a business survey of warehouse operators in the SCAQMD region.34 The survey found that 42% of goods going to high-cube warehouses in the SCAQMD region originated from the Ports, per the figure below.35
30 See Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376. 31 ABJC, Letter to City re: Agenda Item B – File No. PDEV22-017: 5355 East Airport Drive Project (SCH No. 2022090006) (April 15, 2024), Clark Comments, pg. 6. 32 NCST, Warehousing and Distribution Center Facilities in Southern California: The Use of the Commodity Flow Survey Data to Identify Logistics Sprawl and Freight Generation Patterns (July 2017), available at https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-systeminformation/documents/final-reports/ca17-2975-finalreport-a11y.pdf. 33 Id. at 6-7. 34 SCAQMD, SCAQMD High Cube Warehouse Truck Trip Study White Paper Summary Of Business Survey Results (June 2014), available at https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/defaultsource/ceqa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/business-surveysummary.pdf. 35 Id. at pg. 11.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4052
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
During discussion at the April 15, 2024 Development Advisory Board hearing, a City consultant suggested that if the Project only makes truck trips to other warehouses, it would not be necessary to evaluate distance to the Ports. The figure above shows that only a small percentage of goods come from other warehouses and that the lion’s share of goods are from the Ports. Thus, it would be speculative to disregard the Project’s distance from the Ports in analyzing its impacts.
CARE CA’s prior comments discussed the volume of goods passing through the Ports. 32 percent of all containers in the U.S. move through the Ports.36 36 SCAG, ConnectSocal, Technical Report re Goods Movement (Adopted September 3, 2020), pg. 9, available at https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal_goodsmovement.pdf?1606001690.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4053
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
Approximately 40 percent of the total U.S.-Asia trade is served by the Ports, and 40 percent of the imports entering the Ports are transloaded or cross-docked.37 Substantial evidence also demonstrates the demand for port-related warehouse space is expected to expand. SCAG’s 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan forecasts that “Demand for port-related warehouse space is projected to grow at a faster pace than demand for domestic warehousing… As space near the San Pedro Bay Ports reaches capacity, port warehousing will push out to the Inland Empire…. By 2035, the region may experience a shortfall of more than 228 million square feet in warehouse space relative to demand.”38 The table below reflects SCAG’s forecasts for growth in demand for port-related warehouse space. The growth in the port-related market is expected to be much higher than the domestic market.39
In sum, substantial evidence demonstrates that trips to the Ports are reasonably foreseeable for a spec warehouse proposed in the SCAG region, like this one. The lack of a specific tenant identified for the Project does not justify omission 37 SCAG, Industrial Warehousing in the SCAG Region – Task 3: Assessment of Supply Chain Strategies and Implications for Future Development (April 2018), Pg. 1-4, 1-5, https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/task3_supplychaintrends.pdf?1604268170. (Transloading refers to transferring of import cargo from ocean containers into domestic 53-foot containers and trailers for onward movement to U.S. inland destinations via rail or truck.
Crossdocking is a type of transloading in which the cargo is transloaded within approximately 24 hours of arriving at the transload facility.).
38 SCAG, 2012-2035 RTP/SCS, pg. 68, available at https://libraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/scag/2012- 2035-regional-transportation-plan.pdf. 39 SCAG, Industrial Warehousing in the SCAG Region – Task 5: Developing a Policy Evaluation Framework and Assessing the Implications (April 2018), Pg. 2-11, available at https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/fileattachments/task5_developingpolicyevaluation.pdf?1604268239.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4054
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
of this analysis. As a result of this omission, the FEIR underestimates transportation, air quality, and GHG impacts.
F. The FEIR Still Fails to Include Sufficient Investigation into Energy Conservation Measures
CARE CA commented that the FEIR fails to include sufficient investigation into energy conservation measures that might be available or appropriate for the Project, as required by the CEQA Guidelines.40 CARE CA’s comments discussed the decision in California Clean Energy Commission v. City of Woodland (“CCEC”),41 in which the Court of Appeal held that an EIR failed to comply with the requirements of Appendix F to the Guidelines by not discussing or analyzing renewable energy options.42
In Response 1-20, the Staff Report suggests that discussion of energy consumption measures is not required for this Project because its energy impacts are less than significant.43 The City continues to make the same error as the lead agency in CCEC because the EIR in that case also identified a less-than-significant energy impact.44 The court held that the EIR must nonetheless analyze energy consumption measures.45
Response 1-20 provides a “CEQA Guidelines Appendix F Energy Analysis” in Table 1-1.46 Table 1-1 addresses factors listed in Appendix F, subdv. II(C), but fails to include any discussion of renewable energy options. As explained in CCEC, an EIR fails to comply with the requirements of Appendix F by not discussing or analyzing renewable energy options.47 And as explained in CARE CA’s prior comments, this FEIR must analyze the feasibility and effectiveness of measures including onsite solar facilities, electric vehicle charging, alternative fuel sources for the backup generators, more stringent idling requirements, and use of existing power sources during construction rather than generators.
The Staff Report contains additional responses regarding energy in Responses 1-21 to 1-25, but none address the feasibility of reducing energy 40 14 Cal. Code Regs., § 15126.4(a)(1)(C) (stating “‘Energy conservation measures, as well as other appropriate mitigation measures, shall be discussed when relevant.”). 41 (2014) 225 CA4th 173. 42 Id. at 213. 43 Staff Report, Item D - 2471 of 3296. 44 CCEC, supra, 225 CA4th 173 at 183. 45 Id. at 213. 46 Staff Report, Item D - 2471 of 3296. 47 CCEC, supra, 225 CA4th 173 at 213.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4055
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
consumption through onsite solar facilities. Response 1-21 states that the City need not evaluate using alternative fuel sources for backup generators because their emissions would be less-than-significant.48 Again, the Staff Report makes the same mistake proscribed in CCEC by assuming no analysis of energy consumption measures is required if the Project’s energy impact is less-than-significant.49 In Response 1-22, the City states that it would be infeasible to set more stringent idling requirements over existing requirements because there is no enforcement mechanism that the City can assure to enforce adherence.50 But the City is authorized under Development Code Section 4.02.025(E) to impose conditions of approval to protect public health and mitigate environmental impacts.
Section 4.02.025(E)(3) states that “All conditions of approval or requirements authorized by this Section are enforceable in the same manner and to the same extent as any other applicable requirement of this Development Code.” Unenforceability is thus not a valid reason not to consider a more stringent idling requirement.
In Response 1-23, the Staff Report states that the FEIR adequately evaluated the feasibility of utilizing existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or alternative fuel generators rather than temporary power generators during construction. The Response seems to misunderstand the nature of CARE CA’s comment by discussing how “new dry utility infrastructure would be installed underground.”51 Instead, the FEIR should have included a discussion on the feasibility of a measuring limiting use of diesel generators during construction.
In Response 1-25, the Staff Report states that it meaningfully addresses Appendix F’s considerations of “whether a building should be constructed at all, how large it should be, where it should be located, whether it should incorporate renewable energy resources, or anything else external to the building's envelope.”52 But neither the Staff Report nor the FEIR contain this analysis.
In sum, the FEIR’s energy analysis remains wholly inadequate. The Staff Report and the FEIR make no attempt to evaluate the feasibility of onsite renewable energy generation and storage, and fail to consider the feasibility of electric vehicle charging beyond existing requirements. And the Staff Report’s 48 Staff Report, Item D - 2473 of 3296. 49 CCEC, supra, 225 CA4th 173 at 213. 50 Staff Report, Item D - 2474 of 3296. 51 Staff Report, Item D - 2474 of 3296. 52 Staff Report, Item D - 2474 of 3296.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4056
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
6752-008acp
printed on recycled paper
responses to proposed energy consumption measures in Responses 1-21 to 1-25 are generally nonresponsive and fail to meet CEQA’s requirements.
III. THE COMMISSION CANNOT MAKE THE REQUISITE FINDINGS TO
APPROVE THE PROJECT
Section 4.02.025(D) of the City of Ontario Municipal Code sets forth findings necessary to approve a development plan. The Code provides that an application for a development plan shall be denied if the following finding (among others) cannot be clearly established: “The proposed development will complement and/or improve upon the quality of existing development in the vicinity of the project and the minimum safeguards necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare have been required of the proposed project.”53
The Project would have a significant and unavoidable VMT impact. And the Project has potentially significant vapor intrusion, health risk, air quality, GHG, and energy impacts which have been underestimated in the FEIR. Because the Project’s impacts on public health, safety and general welfare have not been adequately analyzed and mitigated, the City cannot make the requisite findings to approve the Project. A revised EIR must be recirculated before the Project can be recommended for approval.
IV. CONCLUSION
As is explained herein, the FEIR’s hazards, air quality, health risk, energy, and transportation analyses remain substantially inaccurate and incomplete, failing to comply with the requirements of CEQA. As a result, the FEIR still fails to adequately disclose and mitigate the Project’s significant impacts. As a consequence of these impacts, the City cannot make the requisite findings under CEQA to certify the FEIR or under the City of Ontario Municipal Code to approve the Project’s Development Plan. CARE CA urges the Commission to require the City revise and recirculate the EIR before any further action is taken on the Project.
Sincerely,
Aidan P. Marshall
Attachment
APM:acp
53 Section 4.02.025(D)(3).
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4057
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
EXHIBIT A
4058
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
May 28, 2024
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Attn: Mr. Aidan Marshall
Subject: Comments On Staff Report For Final Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) 5355 Esat Airport Drive, City of
Ontario, CA SCH No. 202209006
At the request of Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo (ABJC), Clark and Associates (Clark) has reviewed materials related to the August 2023 City of Ontario’s (the City) DEIR of the above referenced project.
Clark’s review of the materials in no way constitutes a validation of the conclusions or materials contained within the plan. If we do not comment on a specific item this does not constitute acceptance of the item.
Project Description:
According to the City of Ontario’s Development Advisory Board Decision File No. PDEV22-017 – Draft EIR (dated March 18, 2024), the draft EIR consists of a Development Plan application to construct a 270,337 square-foot industrial building on the 13.08 acres of the Project site. The Project would require the demolition of the existing buildings and structures, on-site landscaping, and on-site parking. The design would also include the installation of site improvements, including drive aisles, landscaping, utility infrastructure, underground storm drain detection facilities, exterior lighting, walls/fencing, and signage along with improvements to East Airport Drive.
Clark & Associates
Environmental Consulting, Inc.
OFFICE
12405 Venice Blvd
Suite 331
Los Angeles, CA 90066
PHONE
310-907-6165
FAX
310-398-7626
EMAIL
[email protected] CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4059
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Under existing conditions, the Project Site is developed with a grain processing company and a corn storage and distribution facility. The eastern portion of the Project Site contains grain storage silos, grain mill area, and five buildings that are used for maintenance and repair, grain storage, and service shop. The western portion of the Project Site contains enclosed grain storage, with an office trailer. A vehicle wash-down area is also present on the northeastern portion of the Site. Several subsurface septic systems are located beneath the Site to serve the existing uses.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4060
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
In the Meeting Agenda for the May 28th, 2024 City of Ontario Planning Commission/Historic Preservation Meeting Agenda, the City included responses from T&B Planning (T&B) to comments on the Final EIR for the Project provided by CARE CA. The responses from T&B for the City in total claim that no new information has been provided within the comments. This assertion is not supported by the information provided within the responses from CARE.
Specific Comments
1. Comment 1-12: The City’s Air Quality Analysis Did Not Incorporate Building Downwash In The AERMOD Analysis.
T& B claims that building downwash is not appropriate for volume or area sources. This is incorrect. The choice to model the idling trucks, which are movable discrete point sources onsite below the line of the building roof, is a controllable feature in the AERMOD model. Volume sources are defined in the AERMOD Users Guide as included a variety of industrial sources, such as building roof monitors, multiple vents, and conveyor belts.1 Volume sources are characterized as having a defined specific release height above the ground, an initial lateral dimension of the volume, and an initial vertical dimension. While the assumption that roadways and idling trucks in the Health Risk Assessment can be modeled as a line of volume sources, it must be pointed out that emissions from idling trucks and moving trucks will come from the exhaust pipe(s) to the engine, releasing diesel particulate matter (DPM) from a raised pipe at a specific rate (a point source). Therefore, the use of building downwash in the model to ensure that the modeled concentrations are not underestimated is appropriate. Omission of the building downwash effect underestimates the exposure point concentrations for receptors near the building(s). T&B, in Response 1-12, states that the Project’s Air Quality Impact Analysis experts (Technical Appendix B1 of the Draft EIR) have concluded that truck idling emissions sources resulting from the Project would not be materially affected by downwash, but it is important to note that the HRA does not quantify the effects of downwash. The City should address the impact of this issue in a Revised DEIR.
2. Comment 1-41: The Air Quality Analysis Relies On An Input Value From AP-42 That 1 U.S. EPA. 2023. User's Guide for the AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD). Pg 3-68 CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4061
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
Is Rated As Poor And Maybe Unreliable
T&B’s response that the impact from a poorly rated AP-42 value is incorporated into the analysis is not new evidence is not supported by the evidence in the FEIR. As was noted in my prior comments, the CalEEMOD analysis of the construction emissions incorporates various factors from U.S. EPA’s Emission Factors Handbook (AP-42). The AP-42 emission factor for crushing stones used in the CalEEMOD analysis is rated E. This is the worst rating in AP-42, which according to U.S.
EPA may not represent a random sample of the industry. The City’s response to the questioning of the rating of the emission factor was qualitative at best, failing to show any quantitative analysis of the potential impacts. The City should assess the impacts of this variable in a Revised DEIR.
3. Comment 1-16: The Average Truck Trip Length Of 40 Miles Used In The Air Quality Analysis Does Not Match The Length(s) Used To Support Other Warehouse Projects.
According to T&B’s response, the Project is proposed as a speculative development and the user(s) of the building. T&B goes on to state that it is unknown and speculative at this time whether trucks serving the Project would travel to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach as a trip origin or designation, given the complexities of supply chain routing and transportation geography. This line of reasoning clearly conflicts with the goals of CEQA to analyze the foreseeable and reasonable emissions from the Project.
This statement also does not comport with the reality of where warehoused materials will ship from in the region. The 40-mile distance is insufficient to allow vehicles to travel to the major ports in the Southern California region – Los Angeles and Long Beach. These Ports are the largest source(s) of containerized products, and therefore the primary sources of heavy-duty truck traffic, on the West Coast of the United States are the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. “In 2020, the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Oakland collectively accounted for over 34% of all United States international container trade. The Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach alone generate about 35,000 container truck trips every day. Accordingly, the South Coast Air Basin now contains approximately 3,000 warehouses of over 100,000 square feet each, with a total warehouse capacity of approximately CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4062
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
700 million square feet, an increase of 20 percent over the last five years”), 2 citing data from the
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Container TEUs (Twenty-foot Equivalent Units)3 from 2020, the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Oakland combined for 14.157 million TEUs, 34% of 41.24 million TEUs total nationwide.
4 The distance from the Port of LA to the Project site is approximately 62 miles via Interstate 15 to Route 91 to Interstate 710.
Using the 62-mile daily truck trip will nearly double the daily emissions of pollutants associated with the Project, increasing the regional burden and resulting in a potentially significant impact. The City must address the impact of this issue in a R-FEIR.
4. Additional Comments On The FEIR
a. The Truck Route Assumed For The Project Site Ignores The Traffic Constraints Of The Project Site
The truck route assumed in the FEIR assumes traffic will only exit the Project Site and turn left on East Airport Drive to S. Etiwanda Avenue. This route requires the trucks using the Project Site to cross (turn left out of the Project Site) Airport drive and to cross South Etiwanda Drive (turn left onto S. Etiwanda Avenue). The assumed distance to the 10 freeway is approximately 0.8 mile. An alternate route for traffic was not assessed in the FEIR which is longer than the primary route, but would have fewer traffic challenges for the drivers. Assuming trucks exit the Project Site and turn right (avoiding the delay getting across Airport Drive) then turn right on South Milliken Avenue, the vehicles will also be able to reach the 10 Freeway. The distance for this route is approximately 1.6 miles and is closer to the residential properties identified in the FEIR. The City must consider this alternate route and the air quality impacts in a R-FEIR. b. The HRA And Air Quality Analysis Failed To Assess A Receptor Closer To The Project Site Than The Residential Properties To The Northwest – The San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center
2 Available at https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/warehouse-best-practices.pdf 3 https://data.bts.gov/stories/s/Container-TEU/x3fb-aeda/ 4 U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA Operations Support – Port Peak Pricing Program Evaluation (2020), available at https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop09014/sect2.htm CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4063
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
The HRA and Air Quality Analysis failed to consider a significant receptor near the Project Site. The San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center is located approximately 5,600 feet north northeast of the Project Site at 9500 Etiwanda Ave in Rancho Cucamonga. The Detention Center houses approximately 3,347 inmates and 600 workers.
The Detention Center is nearly 3,000 feet closer to the Project Site, and is nearer the proposed truck route, than the residential property identified in the HRA. The City must assess the impacts of the Project emissions on this receptor center in a revised DEIR. c. The Cumulative Analysis Of The Project Failed To Consider The Significant Number Of Existing Warehouse Projects In The Vicinity
Based on the current analysis of warehouse projects within a 5-kilometer radius (3.1 miles) of the Project Site, there are 595 current warehouses, totaling 126,400,000 square feet of floor space.
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4064
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
Those projects account for 85,000 truck trips per day, which emit 117.6 lbs of DPM and 13, 243 lbs of NOx per day. There is an additional 7,400,000 square feet of warehousing that is either approved or undergoing CEQA review (includes the Airport Site). The cumulative impacts must be considered in a revised DEIR.
Conclusion
The facts identified and referenced in this comment letter lead me to reasonably conclude that the Project could result in significant impacts if allowed to proceed. A revised draft environmental impact report should be prepared to address these substantial concerns.
Sincerely,
CARECA-12
(CONT.)
4065
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
ATTACHMENT D
4066
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
6752-010acp
KEVIN T. CARMICHAEL
CHRISTINA M. CARO
THOMAS A. ENSLOW
KELILAH D. FEDERMAN
RICHARD M. FRANCO
ANDREW J. GRAF
TANYA A. GULESSERIAN
DARION N. JOHNSTON
RACHAEL E. KOSS
AIDAN P. MARSHALL
ALAURA R. McGUIRE
TARA C. RENGIFO
Of Counsel
MARC D. JOSEPH
DANIEL L. CARDOZO
SACRAMENTO OFFICE
520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 350
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4721
TEL: (916) 444 - 6201
FAX: (916) 444 - 6209
ADAMS BROADWELL JOSEPH & CARDOZO A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
601 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94080 - 7037
___________
TEL: (650) 589 - 1660
FAX: (650) 589 - 5062
amarshall @adamsbroadwell.com
printed on recycled paper
August 27, 2024
Via Email
City of Ontario Planning Commission
303 East B Street
Ontario, CA 91764
Email: [email protected]
Thomas Grahn, Senior Planner
City of Ontario Planning Department
Email: [email protected]
Re: Agenda Item B – File No. PDEV22-017: 5355 East Airport Drive Project (SCH No. 2022090006)
Dear Planning Commission Members and Mr. Grahn:
On behalf of Californians Allied for a Responsible Economy (“CARE CA”), we submit these comments on the 5355 East Airport Drive Project (SCH No. 2022090006; File No. PDEV22-017) (“Project”), proposed by Prologis. Inc (“Applicant”) in the City of Ontario (“City”). The Project’s Final Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”) and development plan will be considered at the August 27, 2024 Planning Commission meeting as Agenda Item B. The Commission will consider certification of the FEIR and approval of the Development Plan application.
On May 28, 2024, the Planning Commission conducted a hearing to consider the Project and continued the Project for further consideration. In advance of the hearing, CARE CA submitted comments on the FEIR showing that the FEIR failed to comply with the requirements of CEQA by failing to accurately disclose and mitigate potentially significant air quality, public health, greenhouse gas (“GHG”), energy, transportation, and cumulative impacts. The Staff Report contains responses1 to CARE CA’s comments on the FEIR. However, the responses fail to resolve the major flaws CARE CA and its experts identified in the FEIR. The 1 Letter from T&B Planning Inc. to City, re: 5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to May 28, 2024 Comment Letter from CARE CA (August 8, 2024).
CARECA-13
4067
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
August 27, 2024
6752-010acp
printed on recycled paper
responses primarily claim that any issues raised by CARE CA have already been addressed in the FEIR and prior responses. This is incorrect. As shown herein, the City’s responses fail to resolve the legal deficiencies identified in CARE CA’s comments, and do not bring the FEIR into compliance with CEQA. The Project’s environmental review remains inadequate.
We reviewed the Planning Commission Staff Report with the assistance of air quality expert Dr. James Clark2 and transportation expert Norm Marshall.3 CARE CA urges the Planning Commission to require the City revise and recirculate the EIR to comply with CEQA before any further action is taken on the Project.
A. The FEIR Improperly Defers Formulation of Mitigation Measures for Hazardous Materials
The Project’s Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment shows that ethylbenzene concentration in one soil vapor sample exceeded the calculated soil gas commercial/industrial screening level of 163 micrograms per cubic meter.4 CARE CA commented that the FEIR fails to disclose this impact in the body of the FEIR or analyze the resultant health impacts on people, in violation of CEQA.5 The Court in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach explained:
The data in an EIR must not only be sufficient in quantity, it must be presented in a manner calculated to adequately inform the public and decision makers, who may not be previously familiar with the details of the project. “[I]nformation ‘scattered here and there in EIR appendices,’ or a report ‘buried in an appendix,’ is not a substitute for “a good faith reasoned analysis....”6
In Responses CARE-5 and CARE-6, the Staff Report still fails to address this critical informational defect. The responses simply state that the Media Management Plan explains the mitigation procedures that will be undertaken for all earthwork that involves chemically impacted soil.7 But the Media Management Plan provides only general guidance on how impacted soil would generally be 2 Dr. Clark’s technical comments and curricula vitae are attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3 Mr. Marshall’s technical comments and curricula vitae are attached hereto as Exhibit B. 4 FEIR, Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessment, pg. viii. 5 DEIR, Page 4.7-13 (discussing contaminants in excess of thresholds). 6 Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach, 2 Cal.5th 918, 941 (citing Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 442). 7 Staff Report, Letter from T&B Planning Inc., pg. 2-3.
CARECA-13
(CONT.)
CARECA-14
4068
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
August 27, 2024
6752-010acp
printed on recycled paper
addressed – it does not address the FEIR’s informational flaw of failing to disclose whether ethylbenzene contamination is a significant impact requiring mitigation.
CARE CA also commented that the FEIR improperly defers formulation of mitigation for PCE and ethylbenzene contamination. It is unclear whether the City will remove PCE and ethylbenzene contaminated soil or adopt passive/engineered vapor intrusion mitigation such as installing a vapor barrier or venting. Responses CARE-5 and CARE-6 state that the Media Management Plan explains the mitigation procedures that will be undertaken for all earthwork that involves chemically impacted soil.8 But the Media Management Plan simply describes best practices for any required earthwork activities at the Project site. The Plan does not specify whether passive/engineered vapor intrusion mitigation may be employed as opposed to removal of all impacted soil, does not quantify the impacts associated with each form of mitigation (e.g. construction impacts associated with excavation, removal and backfilling contaminated soil versus impacts of installing vapor intrusion barriers), and does not commit the City of the Applicant to specific binding mitigation. As such, the Staff Report fails to address CARE CA’s comments regarding the Project’s significant soil contamination issues.
B. The City Still Fails to Adequately Evaluate Trips Generated by the Project
CARE CA’s comments on the FEIR demonstrated that the Project’s size and number of parking spots would enable it to be used as a High Cube Parcel Hub Warehouse, which has a trip generation rate 2.6 times the rate used in the FEIR.
Responses CARE-7 and CARE-8 state that “the Lead Agency maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR trip generation estimates” and “no further response is required.”9 Response CARE-8 further states that “[b]ased on the Project’s design, there is no reasonable possibility that the Project could be used as a parcel hub.”10
The City has not provided substantial evidence in support of this claim.
Conversely, transportation expert Mr. Marshall discusses the Project’s features in detail, demonstrating that it could be used as a parcel hub.11 Mr. Marshall and CARE CA’s comments demonstrate that the proposed structure has adequate square feet to support use as a parcel hub (at least 200,000 sf), has a ceiling height 8 Staff Report, Letter from T&B Planning Inc., pg. 2-3. 9 Staff Report, Letter from T&B Planning Inc., pg. 3. 10 Id. 11 Marshall Comments, pg. 4-5.
CARECA-14
(CONT.)
CARECA-15
4069
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
August 27, 2024
6752-010acp
printed on recycled paper
of 24 feet or more, and has adequate parking.12 The City fails to rebut this evidence with any evidence.
C. The FEIR Still Fails to Adequately Disclose, Analyze and Mitigate the Project’s Cumulative Impacts
CARE CA commented that the FEIR’s analysis of cumulative impacts is inadequate because it fails to consider the cumulative impacts of past, present, and probable future projects. In summary, the City’s approach to cumulative impacts is that emissions of criteria air pollutants or toxic air contaminants that do not exceed individual project thresholds set by South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) are also not cumulatively considerable.13 CARE CA’s comments explained that rote application of SCAQMD significance thresholds without analysis of the context in which the Project is being proposed fails to satisfy the analytical and information requirements of CEQA, per caselaw such as Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford.14
Responses CARE-9 and CARE-10 state that the FEIR and prior responses to comments already adequately responded to these comments, and no further response is necessary.15 But at no point have the City’s responses meaningfully addressed the caselaw proscribing the City’s invalid approach to cumulative impacts. Response CARE-11 reiterates that the City is complying with current South Coast Air Quality Management District (“SCAQMD”) guidance, as opposed to pending updates to the cumulative impacts guidance. Again, this response ignores the underlying legal mandates for these updates, which include recent CEQA cases such as People of the State of California v. City of Fontana.16 D. The FEIR’s Quantified Health Risk Analysis Underestimates Impacts
CARE CA commented that the City’s Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment (“HRA”) underestimates health risk impacts on sensitive receptors. One issue is that the HRA only analyzes trucks travelling east along Airport Drive, away from sensitive receptors located west of the Project. Trucks could easily travel west on 12 Id.; CARE CA letter to City re: Agenda Item D – File No. PDEV22-017: 5355 East Airport Drive Project (SCH No. 2022090006) (May 28, 2024), pg. 6. 13 DEIR, Appendix B, pg. 53. 14 Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal. App. 3d 692 (“Kings County”); see also, Friends of Oroville v. City of Oroville (2013) 219 Cal. App. 4th 832, 841-42. 15 Staff Report, Letter from T&B Planning Inc., pg. 3-4. 16 San Bernardino Superior Court, Case No. CIVSB2121829; SCAQMD Working Group Meeting # 4, Cumulative Impacts from Air Toxics for CEQA Projects (June 6, 2023) pg. 6; CARECA-16
CARECA-15
(CONT.)
CARECA-17
4070
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
August 27, 2024
6752-010acp
printed on recycled paper
Airport Drive and north along Milliken Avenue, which are both City-designated truck routes. Response CARE-13 states that “[e]ven if trucks travel to and from the Project site along the route as the commenter suggested, it would not materially affect the EIR health risk significance conclusions, as the risks are well below the significance threshold.”17 This statement is not supported by any quantitative analysis. Further, the claim that risks are well below the significance threshold is based on calculations that assume trucks would travel east, away from sensitive receptors. Thus, the City’s response is not supported by substantial evidence.
CARE CA’s air quality expert also demonstrated that the HRA failed to account for building downwash and relied on unreliable input values. Responses CARE-27 and CARE-28 state that no additional response is required regarding these issues. Dr. Clark’s comments, attached, demonstrate that the HRA’s methodological flaws and unsupported conclusions have not been resolved.
E. The FEIR Still Underestimates Truck Trip Lengths and Resultant Impacts
CARE CA commented that the FEIR underestimates truck trip lengths by failing to account for the Project’s distance to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. CARE CA presented numerous comment letters from SCAQMD recommending that warehouse project’s analyze trips to the Ports, and presented evidence showing that trips to the Ports are a reasonably foreseeable consequence for a warehouse in the City of Ontario. Responses CARE-14 and CARE-15 respond that “[t]he commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues” and “no further response is required.”18
Further response is necessary because the City’s previous response (Response 1-16) in the May 28, 2024 Staff Report erroneously stated that the SCAQMD guidance is inapplicable to this Project because this Project would be a speculative warehouse.19 But as explained in CARE CA’s prior comments, SCAQMD advises 17 Staff Report, Letter from T&B Planning Inc., pg. 4. 18 Staff Report, Letter from T&B Planning Inc., pg. 5. 19 “The commenter states that the Final EIR misinterprets the SCAQMD’s guidance and provides examples of previous SCAQMD comments on other, unrelated warehouse projects alleging that the Project’s truck trip length assumptions are not supported by substantial evidence. As discussed in Draft EIR Section 3.0, Project Description, the Project is proposed as a speculative development and the user(s) of the building is not known at this time (refer to Draft EIR p. 3-13). It is unknown and speculative at this time whether trucks serving the Project would travel to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach as a trip origin or designation, given the complexities of supply chain routing and transportation geography. As stated in Response to Comment A-18 in the Final EIR, the trip lengths were derived by weighting the average trip lengths using traffic trip percentages.” CARECA-17
(CONT.)
CARECA-18
4071
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
August 27, 2024
6752-010acp
printed on recycled paper
speculative warehouses to analyze trips to the Ports.20 The City has not corrected this omission or meaningfully addressed this issue.
In response to the studies presented in CARE CA’s comments showing that trips to the Ports are reasonably foreseeable, Response CARE-16 argues that the studies show that it is more likely that the Project will not service the Ports.21 But as explained in CARE CA’s prior comments, an EIR must analyze reasonably foreseeable consequences of a project.22 Here, the Project proposes a 270,337- square-foot industrial building with a proposed height of 46 feet on 13.08 acres of land. CARE CA’s comments contain evidence showing that trips to the Ports are a reasonably foreseeable outcome of a warehouse like this (citing to quantitative evidence regarding the massive volume of goods moving to and from the Ports, as well as specific recommendations from SCAQMD).23 In light of this evidence, the City’s assumption that trucks would not travel to the Ports is unsupported by substantial evidence and is a failure to analyze a reasonably foreseeable use permitted by the Development Plan, as required by CEQA.
F. The FEIR Still Fails to Include Sufficient Investigation into Energy Conservation Measures
CARE CA commented that the FEIR fails to include sufficient investigation into energy conservation measures that might be available or appropriate for the Project, as required by the CEQA Guidelines.24 CARE CA’s comments discussed the decision in California Clean Energy Commission v. City of Woodland (“CCEC”),25 in which the Court of Appeal held that an EIR failed to comply with the requirements of Appendix F to the Guidelines by not discussing or analyzing renewable energy options.26 Response CARE-17 states “[t]his comment does not raise any new issues concerning the environmental analysis provided in the Draft EIR and thus no further response is required.”27
20 SCAQMD, Comments on Notice of Availability of a Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Rubidoux Commerce Park Project (Proposed Project) (SCH No. 2020110449) (October 9, 2023), available at https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/commentletters/2023/october-2023/RVC230901-01.pdf (“the future tenant(s) of the building is not known”). 21 Staff Report, Letter from T&B Planning Inc., pg. 5. 22 Public Resources Code Section 21065; see Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15378; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376. 23 ABJC, Letter to City re: Agenda Item B – File No. PDEV22-017: 5355 East Airport Drive Project (SCH No. 2022090006) (April 15, 2024), Clark Comments, pg. 6. 24 14 Cal. Code Regs., § 15126.4(a)(1)(C) (stating “‘Energy conservation measures, as well as other appropriate mitigation measures, shall be discussed when relevant.”). 25 (2014) 225 CA4th 173. 26 Id. at 213. 27 Staff Report, Letter from T&B Planning Inc., pg. 6.
CARECA-18
(CONT.)
CARECA-19
4072
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
August 27, 2024
6752-010acp
printed on recycled paper
Further response is necessary because the City has not yet analyzed the feasibility and effectiveness of measures including onsite solar facilities, such as rooftop, parking lot, or ground-level solar photovoltaics. The City has not addressed considerations such as the technical and economic feasibility of installing solar facilities on the Project site, the potential size of the Project’s solar zone, and the potential magnitude of mitigation provided by installing solar facilities. The City has not evaluated the extent to which mobile source energy consumption could be reduced during Project operations through electric vehicle charging infrastructure (above what is required by existing regulations).
Response CARE-18 simply states that the Project would be solar ready, but this information does not meet CEQA’s requirements discussed herein and in CARE CA’s prior comments. As such, the Project’s energy analysis remains inadequate.
II. CONCLUSION
As is explained herein, the Staff Report does not correct major flaws in the FEIR’s hazards, air quality, health risk, energy, and transportation analyses. The Project’s environmental review remains substantially inaccurate and incomplete, failing to comply with the requirements of CEQA. As a result, the City cannot make the requisite findings under CEQA to certify the FEIR or under the City of Ontario Municipal Code to approve the Project’s Development Plan.
CARE CA urges the Commission to comply with CEQA and require the City revise and recirculate the EIR before any further action is taken on the Project.
Sincerely,
Aidan P. Marshall
Attachments
APM:acp
CARECA-20
CARECA-19
(CONT.)
4073
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
EXHIBIT A
4074
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
August 23, 2024
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Attn: Mr. Aidan Marshall
Subject: Response To Comments Prepared By T&B Planning for City of Ontario Regarding 5355 East Airport Drive, City of Ontario, CA PDEV22-017
At the request of Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo (ABJC), Clark and Associates (Clark) has reviewed the August 8, 2024 Memorandum from T&B Planning regarding the above referenced project.
Clark’s review of the materials in no way constitutes a validation of the conclusions or materials contained within the plan. If we do not comment on a specific item this does not constitute acceptance of the item.
Specific Comments
1. CARE-4/CARE-5: Failure To Disclose Impacts Of
Ethylbenzene Concentrations In The Subsurface Soils At
The Site And Development of Mitigation Measures For
Worker Safety.
T&B’s response refers us to the Media Management
Plan (Attachment F to the Final EIR). Despite the statement from T&B. that attachment F to the Final EIR is the Media Management Plan from Farallon, it is clear that the file was never attached to the FEIR that is posted at the City of Ontario’s website. The Plan is attached to Item B starting on Clark & Associates
Environmental Consulting, Inc.
OFFICE
12405 Venice Blvd
Suite 331
Los Angeles, CA 90066
PHONE
310-907-6165
FAX
310-398-7626
EMAIL
[email protected]
CARECA-21
CARECA-22
4075
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
page 3039 of the 3379 included in the pdf. According to the Media Management Plan the subject property will be redeveloped as an approximately 250,000 square foot (footprint) warehouse. This is different from the 270,337 square foot industrial building description of the project listed in the Planning Commission Agenda Report.
This comment was specifically to address concerns over the presence of at least two known carcinogens (PCE and ethylbenzene) that were measured onsite in the soil and or soil vapor at the site. Mitigation of the carcinogens prior to initiating redevelopment of the property would ensure workers safety onsite. The Media Management Plan states that “if Contractor encounters an unanticipated condition, the Contractor will stop work, secure the work area, and notify Prologis within 24 hours of discovery of the condition. Prologis will identify and contact the appropriate entity to respond to the unanticipated condition. The procedures that will be followed in the event that an unanticipated subsurface structure is discovered are summarized below:
• A licensed Contractor or an Environmental Professional will remove and containerize any observed residual liquid, sludge, or sediment in the subsurface structure, and will characterize the residual material(s) as required by the waste-receiving facility(ies); • The Contractor will remove the subsurface structure in compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and under permit from and oversight by the applicable regulatory agency, if required;
• Soil removal actions will be performed in accordance with the procedures outlined in this MMP; and
• The area will be cleared after any required regulatory authorization has been obtained from the permitting agency, so work may proceed.”
This approach relies upon the construction workers onsite being able to identify environmental hazards that may not necessarily include visible staining of soils or visible emissions. Prior to any demolition of the site, preparation of a site-specific remedial action work (RAW) plan should be initiated to protect workers onsite. The purpose of the RAW would be to:
1) present and evaluate existing Site conditions; 2) establish appropriate removal action objectives (RAOs) for protection of human health and the environment; and 3) evaluate alternatives and CARECA-22
(CONT.)
4076
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
identify a final recommendation for a removal action at the Site that is protective of human health and the environment.
2. CARE-14, CARE-15, CARE-16, and CARE-29: The Average Truck Trip Length Of 40 Miles Used In The Air Quality Analysis Does Not Match The Length(s) Used To Support Other Warehouse Projects.
According to T&B’s response no new or additional environmental issues have been raised with these comments. The EIR’s flaws have not been resolved regarding the average trip length in the air quality analysis. T&B quotes from the National Center for Sustainable Transportation (NCST) report on Southern California Warehouse and Distribution Center Facilities noting that “the study also stated that “around 62% of the facilities in the SCAG region (approximately 4,900 buildings) are facilities larger than 50,000 sf mainly serving non-port related services. Most of the flow of goods by truck (85% of trips) found in the area is associated with local or intra-regional trips while international shippers have a higher use share of rail and air networks. Activities at port-related warehouses which locate in the Gateway cities focus mainly in transloading, deconsolidation and some value added services. National and international distribution centers are found mainly in the Inland Empire region.”1
T&B fails to include the next paragraph which notes2 “Among the six counties (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura) that comprise the SCAG region, Los Angeles (31.2%), Riverside (21.2%) and San Bernardino (30.2%) account for the largest share of total miles of primary freight network (SCAG, 2016). Consequently, the majority of the facilities (larger than 50,000 sq. ft.) are located in these counties. In terms of the available land for new warehouses, the Inland Empire shows the highest availability (Figure 2) (SCAG, 2009). 56% of the facilities receive goods from the Port of Los Angeles and Long Beach, and around 50% deliver to Southern California warehouses, retail stores or manufacturing plants.” (Emphasis added). Clearly the NCST report 1 NCST. 2017. Warehousing and Distribution Center Facilities in Southern California: The Use of the Commodity Flow Survey Data to Identify Logistics Sprawl and Freight Generation Patterns: A Research Report from the National Center for Sustainable Transportation. Prepared by Miguel Jaller and Leticia Pineda. Dated July 2017. Pg. 6 2 Ibid Pg. 6-7.
CARECA-22
(CONT.)
CARECA-23
4077
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
validates that the majority of facilities in the SCAG region receive goods from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.
As I previously stated in comments on the Project, the 40-mile distance is insufficient to allow vehicles to travel to the major ports in the Southern California region – Los Angeles and Long Beach.
The distance from the Port of LA to the Project site is approximately 62 miles via Interstate 15 to Route 91 to Interstate 710. Using the 62-mile daily truck trip will nearly double the daily emissions of pollutants associated with the Project, increasing the Regional burden and resulting in a potentially significant impact.
3. CARE 20: Emissions From Diesel Generators.
T&B states that “The intermittent use of a backup generator during either construction or operation would not result in a substantial or measurable amount of emissions, since by the very nature of the activity, it would be short-term, intermittent, and infrequent. Thus, contrary to the commenter’s assertion, measures to reduce this source of temporary and intermittent use of energy is not required.
The City’s experts disagree with the commenter and no further response is required” This comment ignores the essence of the comment, which is that the site will have an additional stationary source of diesel particulate matter (DPM) onsite that was not accounted for in the air quality analysis.
As was noted in the EIRs, the primary toxic air contaminant (TAC) associated with the project will be DPM. Diesel exhaust, in particular DPM, is classified by the State of California as a TAC.
TACs, including DPM3
, contribute to a host of respiratory impacts and may lead to the development of various cancers. Failing to quantify the carcinogenic and other health risk impacts places the community at risk for unwanted adverse health impacts. Even brief exposures to the TACs could lead to the development of adverse health impacts over the life of an individual. 3 Because DPM is a TAC, it is a different air pollutant than criteria particulate matter (PM) emissions such as PM10, PM2.5, and fugitive dust. DPM exposure causes acute health effects that are different from the effects of exposure to PM alone.
CARECA-23
(CONT.)
CARECA-24
4078
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
Diesel exhaust has been linked to a range of serious health problems including an increase in respiratory disease, lung damage, cancer, and premature death.4,5,6 Fine DPM is deposited deep in the lungs in the smallest airways and can result in increased respiratory symptoms and disease; decreased lung function, particularly in children and individuals with asthma; alterations in lung tissue and respiratory tract defense mechanisms; and premature death.7 Exposure to DPM increases the risk of lung cancer. It also causes non-cancer effects including chronic bronchitis, inflammation of lung tissue, thickening of the alveolar walls, immunological allergic reactions, and airway constriction.8
DPM is a TAC that is recognized by state and federal agencies as causing severe health risk because it contains toxic materials, unlike PM2.5 and PM10.
9 The inherent toxicity of TACs requires the City to first accurately quantify the concentration released into the environment from all sources and asses at each of the sensitive receptor locations through air dispersion modeling the ground-level concentration, calculate the dose of each TAC at that location, and quantify the cancer risk and hazard index for each of the chemicals of concern.
Following that analysis, then the City can make a determination of the relative significance of the emissions.
4. CARE-31: Exposure Of Prisoners and Workers At The West Valley Detention Center T&B’s response to the question of impacts from the Project to a previously unidentified population source, the San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center (WVDC), located 4 California Air Resources Board, Initial Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, Proposed Identification of Diesel Exhaust as a Toxic Air Contaminant, Staff Report, June 1998; see also California Air Resources Board, Overview:
Diesel Exhaust & Health, https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/overview-diesel-exhaust-andhealth#:~:text=Diesel%20Particulate%20Matter%20and%20Health&text=In%201998%2C%20CARB%20identified%2 0DPM,and%20other%20adverse%20health%20effects.
5 U.S. EPA, Health Assessment Document for Diesel Engine Exhaust, Report EPA/600/8-90/057F, May 2002. 6 Environmental Defense Fund, Cleaner Diesel Handbook, Bring Cleaner Fuel and Diesel Retrofits into Your Neighborhood, April 2005; http://www.edf.org/documents/4941_cleanerdieselhandbook.pdf, accessed July 5, 2020. 7 California Air Resources Board, Initial Statement of Reasons for Rulemaking, Proposed Identification of Diesel Exhaust as a Toxic Air Contaminant, Staff Report, June 1998. 8 Findings of the Scientific Review Panel on The Report on Diesel Exhaust as adopted at the Panel’s April 22, 1998 Meeting.
9 Health & Safety Code § 39655(a) (defining “toxic air contaminant” as air pollutants “which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. A substance that is listed as a hazardous air pollutant pursuant to subsection (b) of Section 112 of the federal act (42 U.S.C.
Sec. 7412 (b)) is a toxic air contaminant.”)
CARECA-24
(CONT.)
CARECA-25
4079
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
approximately 5,600 feet north northeast of the Project Site, was to dismiss the population as a nonlong term residential population. While prisoners may be held at the WVDC for up to a year, there is no opportunity for the prisoners to get away from emissions associated with the Project. Workers at the WVDC should also be included in the evaluation of health impacts. The analyses presented in the EIRs and Staff Report did not address this unique population until we raised a concern.
The Detention Center is nearly 3,000 feet closer to the Project Site than the residential property selected in the EIR. Health risks from exposure are a function of the concentration of the contaminant and the duration of exposure. Until an actual attempt is made to calculate the exposure concentration at the WVDC determinations of relative risk (from either chronic or acute exposures) are speculative at best. The City must assess the impacts of the Project emissions on this receptor center.
5. CARE 32/CARE 10: Additional Cumulative Impacts From Existing/Pending Warehouse Projects
T&B’s response that comments on the cumulative impacts did not raise new information is not supportable. The EIR’s flaws have not been resolved regarding the cumulative impacts on air quality based on the number of existing and new projects in the area. As was pointed out in the last letter, based on the current analysis of warehouse projects within a 5-kilometer radius (3.1 miles) of the Project Site, there are 595 current warehouses, totaling 126,400,000 square feet of floor space.
CARECA-25
(CONT.)
CARECA-26
4080
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
Those projects account for 85,000 truck trips per day, which emit 117.6 lbs of DPM and 13, 243 lbs of NOx per day. There is an additional 7,400,000 square feet of warehousing that is either approved or undergoing CEQA review (includes the Airport Site). Clearly the City has not included the relevant emissions of all the new projects in its analysis of the Project.
6. CARE 27: Building Downwash
T&B’s response to comments on the incorporation of building downwash into the dispersion model are to claim that “The Lead Agency maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of air quality impacts including analysis of building downwash. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary and no further response is required.” This response fails to address the significant issue raised by the comment.
Guidance from authoritative bodies in California regarding the preparation of health risk assessments of mobile sources of diesel emissions10 requires the inclusion of building heights and dimensions for building downwash calculations. Omission of the building downwash effect 10 SCAQMD. 2003. Health Risk Assessment Guidance For Analyzing Cancer Risks From Mobile Source Diesel Emissions. August, 2003. Page 2.
CARECA-26
(CONT.)
CARECA-27
4081
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
underestimates the exposure point concentrations for receptors near the building(s).
In a recent review of Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the Proposed West Campus Upper Plateau Project (Proposed Project) (SCH Number: 2021110304), SCAQMD11 specifically calls out the need for inclusion of downwash analysis for this Project which included a business park, industrial, mixed-use, public facility, parks, recreation and open space, and infrastructure improvements, totaling 369.60 acres. SCAQMD staff reviewing the project outlined that building downwash should be considered for the Proposed Project operation in order to predict more accurate ground-level concentrations. In addition, the truck idling emissions would need to be estimated separately and included in the dispersion modeling analysis and HRA as point sources. The City should address the impact of this issue in a revised EIR.
Conclusion
The facts identified and referenced in this comment letter lead me to reasonably conclude that the Project could result in significant impacts if allowed to proceed. A revised environmental impact report should be prepared to address these substantial concerns.
Sincerely,
11 SCAQMD. 2023. Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the Proposed West Campus Upper Plateau Project (Proposed Project) (SCH Number: 2021110304) Dated March 9, 2023, available at https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/comment-letters/2023/march-2023/RVC230111-04.pdf?sfvrsn=8.
CARECA-28
CARECA-27
(CONT.)
4082
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
EXHIBIT B
4083
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
1 794 Sawnee Bean Road
Thetford Center VT 05075
Norman Marshall, President
(802) 356-2969
[email protected]
August 25, 2024
Aidan P. Marshall
Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo
601 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 1000
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Subject: 5355 East Airport Drive Project
Dear Mr. Marshall,
In October 2023, I reviewed trip generation, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts and greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts of the City of Ontario Draft Environmental Impact Report for a proposed warehouse project at 5355 East Airport Drive (“DEIR”). In April 2024, I addressed additional analysis contained in the Project’s Final EIR (“FEIR”). The Planning Commission Agenda Report dated August 27, 2024 fails to adequately address the outstanding issues identified in my October 2023 and April 2024 comments.
In October 2023, I made the following findings:
1) The DEIR acknowledges significant and unavoidable VMT impact. Furthermore, the DEIR documents that the project would exceed the VMT screening thresholds by a wide margin:
22.56% in the baseline year and 28.47% in the horizon year. 2) The proposed VMT mitigation is not fully specified or quantified in the DEIR and appears to fall far short of what would be required to reduce project VMT below the City’s threshold. Achieving significant VMT mitigation for this project may be impossible – but mitigation must be specified and quantified for the project to be properly evaluated. 3) Project trip generation could be much higher than assumed. Given the large uncertainty in the project’s trip generation, the applicant should take one of two paths -either a) applying a significantly higher and more conservative trip generation rate, or b) requesting as a condition of approval that trip generation will not exceed the number assumed in the EIR, and this be certified prior to beginning construction.
CARECA-29
4084
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
2 4) Project GHG emissions could be much higher than assumed. In addition to trip generation possibly being underestimated, average trip lengths for both trucks and passenger vehicles are likely to be underestimated in the DEIR.
In April 2024, I reviewed the responses to these comments made in the project’s Final Environmental Impact Review (“FEIR”) dated February 2024 and made additional comments on these same points.
My April 2024 comments and the August Report responses follow:
Truck trip lengths – The FEIR repeats the false assertion that the truck trip lengths follow SCAQMD’s recommendations (FEIR, A-18, p. 2-43). In my October 2023 comments, I addressed this, writing:
The truck trip lengths are used in calculations of possible mitigation in Second Draft Staff Report Proposed Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions (WAIRE) Program. And Proposed Rule 316 -Fees for Rule 2305.
1 The reference for these numbers is the 2016 SCAG travel demand model (p. 117) and there is no indication that these numbers are intended for any use beyond this single document. The 40-mile heavy truck trip length also appears in a 2014 slide presentation.
2 In neither case, are these numbers presented as general recommendations for warehouse EIRs.
To prove that this is not a general SCAQMD recommendation for all warehouses, I attach SCAQMD’s November 22, 2023 comments on the Hemlock Warehouse Development Project Draft SEIR in the City of Fontana. That Draft SEIR applied the same truck trip lengths as used in the 5355 East Airport Drive DEIR and FEIR. SCAQMD’s comments state:
However, it is essential to note that the distance from the Proposed Project site to the Port of Los Angeles or Long Beach is approximately 70 miles one-way. Thus, South Coast AQMD staff is concerned about underestimating truck emissions due to the shorter distance that HHDT is analyzed in the Draft SEIR. Hence, it is recommended that the Lead Agency revise the truck emissions analysis using the more conservative trip length between 40 to 70 miles, of which 40 miles could be used for local and 70 miles for Port trips and include the revision in the final CEQA document. Tailoring these parameters and assumptions to be based on project-specific data will ensure a more accurate assessment of emissions, accounting for the unique circumstances and logistical realities of the Proposed Project. (p. 2)
SCAQMD is making the same point I made in my October 2023 comments where I wrote:
it is notable that important major freight origins and destinations are considerably further away than the trip lengths assumed in the DEIR. These include the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach that are approximately 60 miles away. It would be more conservative to assume longer average truck distances in the air quality and GHG analyses.
1 www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/fbmsm-docs/pr-2305_sr_2nd-draft_4-7-21_clean.pdf 2 https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-for-airquality-analysis/sclc_warehouse-presentation-final.pdf CARECA-29
(CONT.)
CARECA-30
4085
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
3 The FEIR does not use SCAQMD- recommended truck trip lengths. SCAQMD instead recommends:
“Tailoring these parameters and assumptions to be based on project-specific data will ensure a more accurate assessment of emissions, accounting for the unique circumstances and logistical realities of the Proposed Project.”
The Report states only:
The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the Lead Agency. The Lead Agency maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project’s truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary and no further response is required. (Report, PDF p. 2609 of 3993)
This response fails to address my comments reproduced above.
VMT mitigation – The FEIR continues to state that the proposed project would exceed the VMT screening thresholds by a wide margin: 22.56% in the baseline year and 28.47% in the horizon year.
However, the FEIR states that these impacts cannot be mitigated because “measures associated with commute trip reduction (CTR) programs and their related commute trip reduction strategies have been excluded as they are not quantifiable, nor can their implementation be guaranteed and enforced since the Project is proposed to be developed as a speculative building without a known tenant." (FEIR A-24, p. 2-44)
My October 2023 comments recommended requiring CAPCOA T-5 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Program (Mandatory Implementation and Monitoring) – that can provide up to 26% VMT reduction:
The mandatory CTR program must include all other elements (i.e., Measures T-7 through T-11) described for the voluntary program (Measure T-5) plus include mandatory trip reduction requirements (including penalties for non-compliance) and regular monitoring and reporting to ensure the calculated VMT reduction matches the observed VMT reduction). (Handbook, p. 86)
A smaller mandatory reduction may be appropriate for this project, with this requirement passed on to the tenant, but it is not sufficient to claim that no significant mitigation is possible.
In addition, the attached SCAQMD comments on the Hemlock Warehouse Development Project recommends several mitigation measures targeting truck emissions, including:
• Require zero-emissions (ZE) or near-zero emission (NZE) on-road haul trucks, • Limit the daily number of trucks allowed at the Proposed Project to levels analyzed in the final CEQA document, and
• Provide electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and electrical hookups for truckers. (p.3) The Report states only:
Contrary to the commenter’s assertion, this memorandum, RTC, and Final EIR demonstrates that the Project’s impacts have been adequately analyzed and mitigated.
CARECA-30
(CONT.)
CARECA-31
4086
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
4 Thus, no additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary are necessary.. (Report, CARE 22 p. PDF 2620-2621 of 3993)
This response fails to address my comments reproduced above.
Trip generation
In my October 2023 comments, I provided data on different types of warehouses that have significantly higher trip generation rates than the 1.75 trips per 1000 sq. ft. assumed in the DEIR and FEIR. These include:
The Parcel Hub Warehouse trip generation rate is 2.6 times the rate used in the DEIR, and the Fulfillment Center Warehouse with Sorting rate is 5.2 times the rate used in the DEIR.
The FEIR argues that the highest generators that I discussed in my October 2023 comments could not be accommodated because “. . . the layout of the site with 251 parking spaces would not reasonable accommodate the on-site parking required to support these uses.” This point about parking may be valid for the highest generators per 1000 sq. ft. but not for the intermediate generators. The DEIR and FEIR estimate only 270 passenger car trips per day (DEIR Appendix K, p. 5), i.e., 135 vehicles in and 135 cars out. Therefore, if all cars were employees and they all worked the same single shift, the parking lot utilization would never exceed 54%. With multiple shifts and non-employee passenger car trips, the parking lot utilization would be much lower. Therefore, the parking lot is designed to support many more trips than assumed in the DEIR and FEIR.
The 251 parking spaces are consistent with ITE Land Use 156: High Cube Parcel Hub Warehouse.
This use is described:
A high-cube warehouse (HCW) is a building that typically has at least 200,000 gross square feet of floor area, has a ceiling height of 24 feet or more, and is used primarily for the storage and/ or consolidation of manufactured goods (and to a lesser extent, raw materials) prior to their distribution to retail locations or other warehouses. A typical HCW has a high level of on-site automation and logistics management. The automation and logistics enable highly-efficient processing of goods through the HCW. A high-cube warehouse can be free-standing or located in an industrial park. A high-cube parcel hub warehouse typically serves as a regional and local freight-forwarder facility for time sensitive shipments via airfreight and ground carriers. A site can also include truck maintenance, wash, or fueling facilities. Some limited assembly and repackaging may occur within the facility.
Given the uncertainty concerning the proposed project and its size, 270,377 sq. ft., it could foreseeably end up being a High-Cube-Parcel-Hub Warehouse as defined above.
The number of parking spaces provided also is consistent with this usage. The trip generation rate for this category is 4.63 trips per 1000 sq. ft., i.e. 2.6 times the rate used in the DEIR and FEIR. This rate includes 0.58 truck trips per 1000 sq. ft. Therefore, the passenger car rate is 4.05 CARECA-31
(CONT.)
CARECA-32
4087
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
5 trips per 1000 sq. ft. As a High-Cube-Parcel-Hub Warehouse, the proposed project would generate 1095 passenger car trips per day.
The DEIR states:
For the purposes of this EIR, the Project is assumed to be operational 24 hours per day, seven days per week, with exterior loading and parking areas illuminated at night. (DEIR, p. 3-13)
This suggests multiple shifts each day.
Some of the passenger car trips would not be parking long term, including trips dropping off and picking up workers, and miscellaneous service trips, all of which include both and entering trip and an exiting trip. However, even if all passenger car trips involved parking long-term, all the trips could be accommodated with the planned 251 parking spaces if each space is occupied an average of 2.18 times per day.
As I stated in my October 2023 comment letter:
Given the large uncertainty in the project’s trip generation, the applicant should take one of two paths - either a) applying a significantly higher and more conservative trip generation rate, or b) requesting as a condition of approval that trip generation will not exceed the number assumed in the EIR, and this be certified prior to beginning construction.
The Report states only:
The Lead Agency maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR trip generation estimates and all environmental impacts related to or attributable to Project trip generation. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary and no further response is required... (Report, CARE 7 p. PDF 2607 of 3993) This response fails to address my comments reproduced above.
In summary, the August 2024 Report fails to adequately address any of my comments.
Sincerely,
Norman L. Marshall
CARECA-32
(CONT.)
4088
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
6 Resume
NORMAN L. MARSHALL, PRESIDENT
[email protected]
EDUCATION:
Master of Science in Engineering Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1982 Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 1977 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: (33 Years, 19 at Smart Mobility, Inc.) Norm Marshall helped found Smart Mobility, Inc. in 2001. Prior to this, he was at RSG for 14 years where he developed a national practice in travel demand modeling. He specializes in analyzing the relationships between the built environment and travel behavior and doing planning that coordinates multi-modal transportation with land use and community needs.
Regional Land Use/Transportation Scenario Planning
Portland Area Comprehensive Transportation System (PACTS) – the Portland Maine Metropolitan Planning Organization. Updating regional travel demand model with new data (including AirSage), adding a truck model, and multiclass assignment including differentiation between cash toll and transponder payments.
Loudoun County Virginia Dynamic Traffic Assignment – Enhanced subarea travel demand model to include Dynamic Traffic Assignment (Cube). Model being used to better understand impacts of roadway expansion on induced travel.
Vermont Agency of Transportation-Enhanced statewide travel demand model to evaluate travel impacts of closures and delays resulting from severe storm events. Model uses innovate Monte Carlo simulations process to account for combinations of failures.
California Air Resources Board – Led team including the University of California in $250k project that reviewed the ability of the new generation of regional activity-based models and land use models to accurately account for greenhouse gas emissions from alternative scenarios including more compact walkable land use and roadway pricing. This work included hands-on testing of the most complex travel demand models in use in the U.S. today.
Climate Plan (California statewide) – Assisted large coalition of groups in reviewing and participating in the target setting process required by Senate Bill 375 and administered by the California Air Resources Board to reduce future greenhouse gas emissions through land use measures and other regional initiatives.
Chittenden County (2060 Land use and Transportation Vision Burlington Vermont region) – led extensive public visioning project as part of MPO’s long-range transportation plan update.
Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization – Implemented walk, transit and bike models within regional travel demand model. The bike model includes skimming bike networks including on-road and off-road bicycle facilities with a bike level of service established for each segment.
Chicago Metropolis Plan and Chicago Metropolis Freight Plan (6-county region)— developed alternative transportation scenarios, made enhancements in the regional travel demand model, and used the enhanced 4089
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
7 model to evaluate alternative scenarios including development of alternative regional transit concepts.
Developed multi-class assignment model and used it to analyze freight alternatives including congestion pricing and other peak shifting strategies.
Municipal Planning
City of Grand Rapids – Michigan Street Corridor – developed peak period subarea model including nonmotorized trips based on urban form. Model is being used to develop traffic volumes for several alternatives that are being additional analyzed using the City’s Synchro model City of Omaha - Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for non-motorized trips, transit trips and shorter auto trips that would result from more compact mixed-use development. Scenarios with different roadway, transit, and land use alternatives were modeled.
City of Dublin (Columbus region) – Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for nonmotorized trips and shorter auto trips that would result from more compact mixed-use development. The model was applied in analyses for a new downtown to be constructed in the Bridge Street corridor on both sides of an historic village center.
City of Portland, Maine – Implemented model improvements that better account for non-motorized trips and interactions between land use and transportation and applied the enhanced model to two subarea studies.
City of Honolulu – Kaka’ako Transit Oriented Development (TOD) – applied regional travel demand model in estimating impacts of proposed TOD including estimating internal trip capture.
City of Burlington (Vermont) Transportation Plan – Led team that developing Transportation Plan focused on supporting increased population and employment without increases in traffic by focusing investments and policies on transit, walking, biking and Transportation Demand Management.
Transit Planning
Regional Transportation Authority (Chicago) and Chicago Metropolis 2020 – evaluated alternative 2020 and 2030 system-wide transit scenarios including deterioration and enhance/expand under alternative land use and energy pricing assumptions in support of initiatives for increased public funding.
Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Austin, TX) Transit Vision – analyzed the regional effects of implementing the transit vision in concert with an aggressive transit-oriented development plan developed by Calthorpe Associates. Transit vision includes commuter rail and BRT.
Bus Rapid Transit for Northern Virginia HOT Lanes (Breakthrough Technologies, Inc and Environmental Defense.) – analyzed alternative Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) strategies for proposed privately-developing High Occupancy Toll lanes on I-95 and I-495 (Capital Beltway) including different service alternatives (point-to-point services, trunk lines intersecting connecting routes at in-line stations, and hybrid).
Roadway Corridor Planning
I-30 Little Rock Arkansas – Developed enhanced version of regional travel demand model that integrates TransCAD with open source Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) software, and used to model I-30 alternatives.
Freeway bottlenecks are modeled much more accurately than in the base TransCAD model. 4090
5355 East Airport Drive (PDEV22-017) – Response to September 5, 2024 Appeal Letter from CARE CA September 13, 2024
8 South Evacuation Lifeline (SELL) – In work for the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, used Dynamic Travel Assignment (DTA) to estimate evaluation times with different transportation alternatives in coastal South Caroline including a new proposed freeway.
Hudson River Crossing Study (Capital District Transportation Committee and NYSDOT) – Analyzing long term capacity needs for Hudson River bridges which a special focus on the I-90 Patroon Island Bridge where a microsimulation VISSIM model was developed and applied.
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS (partial list)
DTA Love: Co-leader of workshop on Dynamic Traffic Assignment at the June 2019 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.
Forecasting the Impossible: The Status Quo of Estimating Traffic Flows with Static Traffic Assignment and the Future of Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Research in Transportation Business and Management 2018.
Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the August 2018 Transportation Research Board Tools of the Trade Conference on Transportation Planning for Small and Medium Sized Communities.
Vermont Statewide Resilience Modeling. With Joseph Segale, James Sullivan and Roy Schiff. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.
Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.
Pre-Destination Choice Walk Mode Choice Modeling. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.
A Statistical Model of Regional Traffic Congestion in the United States, presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
MEMBERSHIPS/AFFILIATIONS
Associate Member, Transportation Research Board (TRB)
Member and Co-Leader Project for Transportation Modeling Reform, Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) 4091
DATE: November 8, 2024
TO: Tracy Chu, Project Manager
FROM: Haseeb Qureshi, Michael Tirohn
JOB NO: 14539-05 HRA Memo
5355 EAST AIRPORT DRIVE SUPPLEMENTAL HEALTH RISK
ASSESSMENT
Tracy Chu,
Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Supplemental Health Risk Assessment for the 5355 East Airport Drive (Project), which is located in the City of Ontario. This letter has been prepared in order to present the potential health risk resulting from the construction and operation of the proposed Project to the West Valley Detention Center, as well as to evaluate the potential health risk to sensitive receptors should a portion of Project trucks travel west on Airport Drive.
POTENTIAL AIRPORT DRIVE/S. MILLIKEN AVENUE TRUCK TRAVEL Consistent with the Project traffic study, the 5355 East Airport Drive Mobile Source Health Risk Assessment assumed that all trucks accessing the Project site would travel east on Airport drive and access I-10 via S. Etiwanda Avenue. However, in this supplemental health risk assessment evaluates a scenario in which half of Project trucks would travel this path, while the remaining half would access the Project site by traveling west on Airport Drive and accessing I-10 via S. Milliken Avenue.
The results of the analysis indicate that with Project truck traffic split evenly between Airport Drive/S. Etiwanda Avenue and Airport Drive/S. Milliken Avenue, Location R6, located approximately 8,840 feet northwest of the Project site, would remain the location of the maximally exposed individual resident, and cancer risk would remain unchanged at <0.01. Further, non-cancer risk would also remain unchanged at <0.01. As such, the potential use of Airport Drive/S. Milliken Avenue by Project trucks would not significantly affect the results of the analysis, and cancer and non-cancer risk would remain less than significant. Exhibit 1 presents the location of modeled off-site truck routes.
4092
Tracy Chu, Project Manager
November 8, 2024
14539-05 HRA Memo
EXHIBIT 1: OFF-SITE TRUCK ROUTES
Detailed operational emission calculations are presented in Attachment A, and AERMOD model outputs are presented in Attachment B. Detailed health risk calculations are presented in Attachment C.
WEST VALLEY DETENTION CENTER HEALTH RISK
In order to account for potential cancer and non-cancer health risks to the San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center, additional receptors were added in order to represent inmates who may be exposed to construction and operational emissions generated by the proposed Project. Construction and operational cancer risk was conservatively calculated using a residential exposure scenario, with exposure beginning at age 16. Further, a fraction of time at home value of 1.00 was conservatively assumed.
CONSTRUCTION
At the West Valley Detention Center, the maximum incremental cancer risk attributable to Project construction-source DPM emissions is estimated at <0.01 in one million, which is less 4093
Tracy Chu, Project Manager
November 8, 2024
14539-05 HRA Memo
than the SCAQMD’s significance threshold of 10 in one million. At this same location, noncancer risks were estimated to be <0.01, which would not exceed the applicable threshold of
1.0. As such, the Project will not cause a significant human health or cancer risk to inmates at the West Valley Detention Center as a result of Project construction activity.
OPERATION
At the West Valley Detention Center, the maximum incremental cancer risk attributable to Project operational-source DPM emissions is estimated at <0.01 in one million, which is less than the SCAQMD’s significance threshold of 10 in one million. At this same location, noncancer risks were estimated to be <0.01, which would not exceed the applicable significance threshold of 1.0. As such, the Project will not cause a significant human health or cancer risk to inmates at the West Valley Detention Center. Exhibit 2 presents the locations of the nearest modeled receptors.
EXHIBIT 2: RECEPTOR LOCATIONS
4094
14539-05 HRA Memo
ATTACHMENT A
EMFAC EMISSIONS SUMMARY
4095
Emissions Phase Lb/Day # Days Emissions Avg/Lb Day Avg/Hourly Demolition 0.23 60 13.8 0.23 0.02875
On-Site Site Preparation 0.10 30 3 0.1 0.0125
Exhaust PM-10 Grading 0.18 30 5.4 0.18 0.0225
Building Construction 0.25 160 40 0.25 0.03125
Paving 0.09 45 4.05 0.09 0.01125
Architectural Coatings 0.04 30 1.2 0.04 0.005
0.89 250 67.45 0.2698 0.033725
Demolition 1.00E-02 60 0.6 0.01 0.00125
Off-Site Site Preparation 5.00E-03 30 0.15 0.005 0.000625 Exhaust PM-10 Grading 3.50E-02 30 1.05 0.035 0.004375
Building Construction 1.00E-02 160 1.6 0.01 0.00125
Paving 0.00E+00 45 0 0 0
Architectural Coatings 0.00E+00 30 0 0 0
6.00E-02 250 3.4 0.0136 0.0017
No. Days
60 30
30 160
45 30
250
Start Date End Date
9/4/2023
7/25/2023 9/4/2023
Phase
Site Preparation
Grading
7/25/2023
Demolition 5/2/2023 7/24/2023
Total Days of Construction
9/5/2023 4/15/2024
2/13/2024 4/15/2024
3/5/2024 4/15/2024
Building Construction
Paving
Arch Coatings
4096
Speed LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD
0 0.316954 0.498613 0.051812 0.01310
5 0.039143 0.05572 0.030547 0.01151
25 0.01796 0.026556 0.00817 0.00576
Speed
0 5
25 AVERAGE EMISSION FACTOR
0.00889
0.02107
Weighted Average Emissions
0.08568
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 2024
4097
VMT a Truck Emission Rate b Truck Emission Rate b Daily Truck Emissions c Modeled Emission Rates (miles/day) (grams/mile) (grams/idle-hour) (grams/day) (g/second) 84 0.0857 3.90 4.517E-05
168 41.19 0.0211 1.28 1.482E-05
84 96.52 0.0089 1.05 1.217E-05
84 142.80 0.0089 1.56 1.800E-05
a
b
Truck Emission Rates
Source Trucks Per Day
On-Site Idling
This column includes the total truck travel and truck idle emissions. For idle emissions this column includes emissions based on the assumption that each truck idles for 15 minutes. c Vehicle miles traveled are for modeled truck route only.
Emission rates determined using EMFAC 2021. Idle emission rates are expressed in grams per idle hour rather than grams per mile.
On-Site Travel
Off-Site Travel - E. Airport Dr./S. Etiwanda Ave. 100% Inbound/Outbound WB Off-Site Travel - E. Airport Dr./S. Etiwanda Ave. 100% Inbound/Outbound EB 4098
calendar_yseason_m sub_area vehicle_class fuel temperatu relative_huprocess speed_tim pollutant emission_rate 2024 Annual San Berna HHDT Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 5 PM10 0.01351 2024 Annual San Berna HHDT Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 25 PM10 0.006762 2024 Annual San Berna LHDT1 Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 5 PM10 0.098223 2024 Annual San Berna LHDT1 Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 25 PM10 0.045069 2024 Annual San Berna LHDT2 Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 5 PM10 0.089018 2024 Annual San Berna LHDT2 Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 25 PM10 0.042425 2024 Annual San Berna MHDT Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 5 PM10 0.033532 2024 Annual San Berna MHDT Dsl 60 70 RUNEX 25 PM10 0.008968 4099
Source: EMFAC2021 (v1.0.2) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Sub-Area
Region: San Bernardino (SC)
Calendar Year: 2024
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for CVMT and EVMT, trips/day for Trips, kWh/day for Energy Consumption, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption Region Calendar YVehicle CaModel YeaSpeed Fuel Population San Berna 2024 HHDT AggregateAggregate Gasoline 5.56599 San Berna 2024 HHDT AggregateAggregate Diesel 14232
San Berna 2024 HHDT AggregateAggregate Natural Ga 2469.47 San Berna 2024 LHDT1 AggregateAggregate Gasoline 17179.5 San Berna 2024 LHDT1 AggregateAggregate Diesel 11382.1
San Berna 2024 LHDT2 AggregateAggregate Gasoline 2883.7 San Berna 2024 LHDT2 AggregateAggregate Diesel 4825.53
San Berna 2024 MHDT AggregateAggregate Gasoline 1460.6
San Berna 2024 MHDT AggregateAggregate Diesel 14946.5
San Berna 2024 MHDT AggregateAggregate Natural Ga 195.676 HHDT% GAS/NG 0.14814
HHDT% DSL 0.85186
LHDT1% GAS 0.60149
LHDT1% DSL 0.39851
LHDT2% GAS 0.37406
LHDT2% DSL 0.62594
MHDT% GAS 0.08902
MHDT% DSL 0.91098
4100
14539-05 HRA Memo
ATTACHMENT B
AERMOD OUTPUTS
4101
** Lakes Environmental AERMOD MPI
**
****************************************
**
** AERMOD Input Produced by:
** AERMOD View Ver. 12.0.0
** Lakes Environmental Software Inc.
** Date: 10/28/2024
** File: C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Construction\14539 Construction.ADI
**
****************************************
**
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Control Pathway
****************************************
**
**
CO STARTING
TITLEONE C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops
MODELOPT DFAULT CONC
AVERTIME PERIOD
URBANOPT 2035210 San_Bernadino_County
POLLUTID DPM
RUNORNOT RUN
ERRORFIL "14539 Construction.err"
CO FINISHED
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Source Pathway
****************************************
**
**
SO STARTING
** Source Location **
** Source ID - Type - X Coord. - Y Coord. **
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3
** DESCRSRC Offsite
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 14.00
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 0.0002141964
** Vertical Dimension = 6.99
** SZINIT = 3.25
** Nodes = 14
** 450531.488, 3769231.780, 298.42, 3.49, 6.51
** 451458.160, 3769224.475, 296.68, 3.49, 6.51
** 451477.884, 3769223.014, 297.16, 3.49, 6.51
** 451508.566, 3769211.326, 297.73, 3.49, 6.51
** 451579.062, 3769183.931, 297.18, 3.49, 6.51
** 451600.612, 3769178.452, 297.61, 3.49, 6.51
** 451630.198, 3769176.626, 297.58, 3.49, 6.51
** 451633.851, 3769205.116, 298.46, 3.49, 6.51
** 451632.755, 3769377.520, 307.01, 3.49, 6.51
** 451633.851, 3769443.268, 304.95, 3.49, 6.51
** 451634.581, 3769487.099, 305.91, 3.49, 6.51
** 451637.869, 3769611.288, 307.59, 3.49, 6.51
** 451637.869, 3769784.058, 305.17, 3.49, 6.51
** 451642.335, 3769918.705, 307.93, 3.49, 6.51
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000001 VOLUME 450538.488 3769231.725 298.40
LOCATION L0000002 VOLUME 450552.488 3769231.615 298.43
LOCATION L0000003 VOLUME 450566.487 3769231.505 298.57 4102 LOCATION L0000004 VOLUME 450580.487 3769231.394 298.70
LOCATION L0000005 VOLUME 450594.486 3769231.284 298.70
LOCATION L0000006 VOLUME 450608.486 3769231.173 298.70
LOCATION L0000007 VOLUME 450622.485 3769231.063 298.70
LOCATION L0000008 VOLUME 450636.485 3769230.953 298.70
LOCATION L0000009 VOLUME 450650.485 3769230.842 298.70
LOCATION L0000010 VOLUME 450664.484 3769230.732 298.70
LOCATION L0000011 VOLUME 450678.484 3769230.622 298.61
LOCATION L0000012 VOLUME 450692.483 3769230.511 298.47
LOCATION L0000013 VOLUME 450706.483 3769230.401 298.40
LOCATION L0000014 VOLUME 450720.482 3769230.291 298.40
LOCATION L0000015 VOLUME 450734.482 3769230.180 298.40
LOCATION L0000016 VOLUME 450748.481 3769230.070 298.40
LOCATION L0000017 VOLUME 450762.481 3769229.959 298.40
LOCATION L0000018 VOLUME 450776.481 3769229.849 298.40
LOCATION L0000019 VOLUME 450790.480 3769229.739 298.40
LOCATION L0000020 VOLUME 450804.480 3769229.628 298.40
LOCATION L0000021 VOLUME 450818.479 3769229.518 298.40
LOCATION L0000022 VOLUME 450832.479 3769229.408 298.34
LOCATION L0000023 VOLUME 450846.478 3769229.297 298.28
LOCATION L0000024 VOLUME 450860.478 3769229.187 298.08
LOCATION L0000025 VOLUME 450874.478 3769229.077 297.83
LOCATION L0000026 VOLUME 450888.477 3769228.966 297.74
LOCATION L0000027 VOLUME 450902.477 3769228.856 297.74
LOCATION L0000028 VOLUME 450916.476 3769228.745 297.70
LOCATION L0000029 VOLUME 450930.476 3769228.635 297.61
LOCATION L0000030 VOLUME 450944.475 3769228.525 297.50
LOCATION L0000031 VOLUME 450958.475 3769228.414 297.36
LOCATION L0000032 VOLUME 450972.475 3769228.304 297.23
LOCATION L0000033 VOLUME 450986.474 3769228.194 297.17
LOCATION L0000034 VOLUME 451000.474 3769228.083 297.11
LOCATION L0000035 VOLUME 451014.473 3769227.973 297.05
LOCATION L0000036 VOLUME 451028.473 3769227.863 297.00
LOCATION L0000037 VOLUME 451042.472 3769227.752 296.91
LOCATION L0000038 VOLUME 451056.472 3769227.642 296.82
LOCATION L0000039 VOLUME 451070.471 3769227.531 296.76
LOCATION L0000040 VOLUME 451084.471 3769227.421 296.70
LOCATION L0000041 VOLUME 451098.471 3769227.311 296.68
LOCATION L0000042 VOLUME 451112.470 3769227.200 296.68
LOCATION L0000043 VOLUME 451126.470 3769227.090 296.63
LOCATION L0000044 VOLUME 451140.469 3769226.980 296.54
LOCATION L0000045 VOLUME 451154.469 3769226.869 296.46
LOCATION L0000046 VOLUME 451168.468 3769226.759 296.41
LOCATION L0000047 VOLUME 451182.468 3769226.649 296.37
LOCATION L0000048 VOLUME 451196.468 3769226.538 296.37
LOCATION L0000049 VOLUME 451210.467 3769226.428 296.36
LOCATION L0000050 VOLUME 451224.467 3769226.317 296.32
LOCATION L0000051 VOLUME 451238.466 3769226.207 296.27
LOCATION L0000052 VOLUME 451252.466 3769226.097 296.18
LOCATION L0000053 VOLUME 451266.465 3769225.986 296.08
LOCATION L0000054 VOLUME 451280.465 3769225.876 295.95
LOCATION L0000055 VOLUME 451294.465 3769225.766 295.80
LOCATION L0000056 VOLUME 451308.464 3769225.655 295.66
LOCATION L0000057 VOLUME 451322.464 3769225.545 295.52
LOCATION L0000058 VOLUME 451336.463 3769225.435 295.51
LOCATION L0000059 VOLUME 451350.463 3769225.324 295.66
LOCATION L0000060 VOLUME 451364.462 3769225.214 295.85
LOCATION L0000061 VOLUME 451378.462 3769225.103 296.13
LOCATION L0000062 VOLUME 451392.461 3769224.993 296.37
LOCATION L0000063 VOLUME 451406.461 3769224.883 296.48
LOCATION L0000064 VOLUME 451420.461 3769224.772 296.58
LOCATION L0000065 VOLUME 451434.460 3769224.662 296.65
LOCATION L0000066 VOLUME 451448.460 3769224.552 296.73
LOCATION L0000067 VOLUME 451462.448 3769224.158 296.96
LOCATION L0000068 VOLUME 451476.409 3769223.123 297.19
LOCATION L0000069 VOLUME 451489.585 3769218.556 297.41 4103 LOCATION L0000070 VOLUME 451502.668 3769213.573 297.56
LOCATION L0000071 VOLUME 451515.732 3769208.541 297.47
LOCATION L0000072 VOLUME 451528.782 3769203.470 297.27
LOCATION L0000073 VOLUME 451541.831 3769198.399 297.11
LOCATION L0000074 VOLUME 451554.880 3769193.328 297.17
LOCATION L0000075 VOLUME 451567.930 3769188.257 297.23
LOCATION L0000076 VOLUME 451581.055 3769183.424 297.30
LOCATION L0000077 VOLUME 451594.624 3769179.975 297.39
LOCATION L0000078 VOLUME 451608.418 3769177.970 297.39
LOCATION L0000079 VOLUME 451622.392 3769177.108 297.39
LOCATION L0000080 VOLUME 451630.984 3769182.754 297.63
LOCATION L0000081 VOLUME 451632.764 3769196.640 298.07
LOCATION L0000082 VOLUME 451633.816 3769210.571 298.48
LOCATION L0000083 VOLUME 451633.727 3769224.571 298.95
LOCATION L0000084 VOLUME 451633.638 3769238.570 299.44
LOCATION L0000085 VOLUME 451633.549 3769252.570 299.94
LOCATION L0000086 VOLUME 451633.460 3769266.570 300.44
LOCATION L0000087 VOLUME 451633.371 3769280.570 301.02
LOCATION L0000088 VOLUME 451633.282 3769294.569 301.79
LOCATION L0000089 VOLUME 451633.193 3769308.569 302.60
LOCATION L0000090 VOLUME 451633.104 3769322.569 303.59
LOCATION L0000091 VOLUME 451633.015 3769336.568 304.59
LOCATION L0000092 VOLUME 451632.926 3769350.568 305.92
LOCATION L0000093 VOLUME 451632.837 3769364.568 307.24
LOCATION L0000094 VOLUME 451632.773 3769378.567 307.33
LOCATION L0000095 VOLUME 451633.006 3769392.566 307.21
LOCATION L0000096 VOLUME 451633.239 3769406.564 306.54
LOCATION L0000097 VOLUME 451633.472 3769420.562 305.68
LOCATION L0000098 VOLUME 451633.706 3769434.560 305.17
LOCATION L0000099 VOLUME 451633.939 3769448.558 304.90
LOCATION L0000100 VOLUME 451634.172 3769462.556 304.97
LOCATION L0000101 VOLUME 451634.406 3769476.554 305.44
LOCATION L0000102 VOLUME 451634.673 3769490.551 305.91
LOCATION L0000103 VOLUME 451635.043 3769504.546 306.38
LOCATION L0000104 VOLUME 451635.414 3769518.541 306.72
LOCATION L0000105 VOLUME 451635.784 3769532.536 306.47
LOCATION L0000106 VOLUME 451636.155 3769546.532 306.23
LOCATION L0000107 VOLUME 451636.525 3769560.527 306.34
LOCATION L0000108 VOLUME 451636.896 3769574.522 306.46
LOCATION L0000109 VOLUME 451637.266 3769588.517 306.97
LOCATION L0000110 VOLUME 451637.636 3769602.512 307.53
LOCATION L0000111 VOLUME 451637.869 3769616.509 307.71
LOCATION L0000112 VOLUME 451637.869 3769630.509 307.75
LOCATION L0000113 VOLUME 451637.869 3769644.509 307.23
LOCATION L0000114 VOLUME 451637.869 3769658.509 306.32
LOCATION L0000115 VOLUME 451637.869 3769672.509 305.61
LOCATION L0000116 VOLUME 451637.869 3769686.509 305.13
LOCATION L0000117 VOLUME 451637.869 3769700.509 304.74
LOCATION L0000118 VOLUME 451637.869 3769714.509 304.53
LOCATION L0000119 VOLUME 451637.869 3769728.509 304.39
LOCATION L0000120 VOLUME 451637.869 3769742.509 304.60
LOCATION L0000121 VOLUME 451637.869 3769756.509 304.80
LOCATION L0000122 VOLUME 451637.869 3769770.509 305.06
LOCATION L0000123 VOLUME 451637.884 3769784.509 305.33
LOCATION L0000124 VOLUME 451638.348 3769798.501 306.17
LOCATION L0000125 VOLUME 451638.812 3769812.493 307.08
LOCATION L0000126 VOLUME 451639.276 3769826.486 307.41
LOCATION L0000127 VOLUME 451639.740 3769840.478 307.50
LOCATION L0000128 VOLUME 451640.205 3769854.470 307.84
LOCATION L0000129 VOLUME 451640.669 3769868.462 308.36
LOCATION L0000130 VOLUME 451641.133 3769882.455 308.51
LOCATION L0000131 VOLUME 451641.597 3769896.447 308.19
LOCATION L0000132 VOLUME 451642.061 3769910.439 307.84
** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3
LOCATION VOL1 VOLUME 450539.570 3769359.370 299.550
LOCATION VOL2 VOLUME 450585.432 3769360.222 299.450 4104 LOCATION VOL3 VOLUME 450631.293 3769361.071 299.260
LOCATION VOL4 VOLUME 450676.306 3769362.770 299.280
LOCATION VOL5 VOLUME 450722.167 3769364.468 299.290
LOCATION VOL6 VOLUME 450768.029 3769365.318 299.300
LOCATION VOL7 VOLUME 450814.315 3769366.167 299.310
LOCATION VOL8 VOLUME 450846.588 3769383.153 299.660
LOCATION VOL9 VOLUME 450865.273 3769338.565 299.180
LOCATION VOL10 VOLUME 450865.273 3769385.276 299.600
LOCATION VOL11 VOLUME 450819.836 3769337.291 299.020
LOCATION VOL12 VOLUME 450773.974 3769320.730 298.850
LOCATION VOL13 VOLUME 450728.537 3769319.456 298.840
LOCATION VOL14 VOLUME 450682.676 3769319.456 298.840
LOCATION VOL15 VOLUME 450637.239 3769317.333 298.820
LOCATION VOL16 VOLUME 450591.802 3769315.209 298.790
LOCATION VOL17 VOLUME 450544.241 3769314.785 299.090
LOCATION VOL18 VOLUME 450542.118 3769267.225 298.610
LOCATION VOL19 VOLUME 450590.103 3769266.800 298.500
LOCATION VOL20 VOLUME 450634.266 3769274.444 298.650
LOCATION VOL21 VOLUME 450680.128 3769274.868 298.700
LOCATION VOL22 VOLUME 450724.715 3769273.594 298.440
LOCATION VOL23 VOLUME 450768.029 3769274.868 298.320
LOCATION VOL24 VOLUME 450814.740 3769291.005 298.390
LOCATION VOL25 VOLUME 450862.725 3769293.128 298.700
LOCATION VOL26 VOLUME 450634.691 3769265.951 298.670
LOCATION VOL27 VOLUME 450681.402 3769264.677 298.660
LOCATION VOL28 VOLUME 450728.112 3769265.951 298.410
LOCATION VOL29 VOLUME 450773.549 3769267.225 298.300
LOCATION VOL30 VOLUME 450816.439 3769266.800 298.190
LOCATION VOL31 VOLUME 450863.999 3769266.375 298.400
** Source Parameters **
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3
SRCPARAM L0000001 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000002 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000003 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000004 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000005 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000006 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000007 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000008 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000009 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000010 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000011 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000012 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000013 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000014 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000015 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000016 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000017 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000018 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000019 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000020 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000021 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000022 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000023 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000024 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000025 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000026 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000027 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000028 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000029 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000030 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000031 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000032 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000033 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000034 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000035 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25 4105
SRCPARAM L0000036 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000037 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000038 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000039 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000040 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000041 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000042 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000043 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000044 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000045 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000046 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000047 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000048 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000049 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000050 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000051 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000052 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000053 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000054 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000055 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000056 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000057 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000058 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000059 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000060 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000061 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000062 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000063 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000064 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000065 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000066 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000067 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000068 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000069 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000070 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000071 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000072 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000073 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000074 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000075 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000076 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000077 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000078 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000079 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000080 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000081 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000082 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000083 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000084 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000085 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000086 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000087 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000088 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000089 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000090 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000091 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000092 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000093 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000094 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000095 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000096 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000097 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000098 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000099 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000100 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000101 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25 4106
SRCPARAM L0000102 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000103 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000104 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000105 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000106 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000107 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000108 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000109 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000110 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000111 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000112 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000113 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000114 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000115 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000116 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000117 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000118 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000119 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000120 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000121 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000122 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000123 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000124 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000125 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000126 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000127 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000128 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000129 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000130 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000131 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000132 0.000001623 3.49 6.51 3.25
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- SRCPARAM VOL1 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL2 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL3 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL4 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL5 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL6 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL7 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL8 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL9 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL10 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL11 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL12 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL13 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL14 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL15 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL16 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL17 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL18 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL19 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL20 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL21 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL22 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL23 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL24 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL25 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL26 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL27 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL28 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL29 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL30 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
SRCPARAM VOL31 0.0001370735 5.000 10.665 1.400
URBANSRC ALL
SRCGROUP ALL
SO FINISHED 4107
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Receptor Pathway
****************************************
**
**
RE STARTING
INCLUDED "14539 Construction.rou"
RE FINISHED
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Meteorology Pathway
****************************************
**
**
ME STARTING
SURFFILE KONT_V9_ADJU\KONT_v9.SFC
PROFFILE KONT_V9_ADJU\KONT_v9.PFL
SURFDATA 3102 2012
UAIRDATA 3190 2012
PROFBASE 289.0 METERS
ME FINISHED
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Output Pathway
****************************************
**
**
OU STARTING
** Auto-Generated Plotfiles
PLOTFILE PERIOD ALL "14539 CONSTRUCTION.AD\PE00GALL.PLT" 31 SUMMFILE "14539 Construction.sum"
OU FINISHED
*** Message Summary For AERMOD Model Setup ***
--------- Summary of Total Messages --------
A Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s)
A Total of 2 Warning Message(s)
A Total of 0 Informational Message(s)
******** FATAL ERROR MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
ME W186 416 MEOPEN: THRESH_1MIN 1-min ASOS wind speed threshold used 0.50 ME W187 416 MEOPEN: ADJ_U* Option for Stable Low Winds used in AERMET ***********************************
*** SETUP Finishes Successfully ***
***********************************
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 1
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** MODEL SETUP OPTIONS SUMMARY ***
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
** Model Options Selected:
* Model Uses Regulatory DEFAULT Options
* Model Is Setup For Calculation of Average CONCentration Values. * NO GAS DEPOSITION Data Provided.
* NO PARTICLE DEPOSITION Data Provided.
* Model Uses NO DRY DEPLETION. DDPLETE = F
* Model Uses NO WET DEPLETION. WETDPLT = F
* Stack-tip Downwash.
* Model Accounts for ELEVated Terrain Effects.
* Use Calms Processing Routine.
* Use Missing Data Processing Routine.
* No Exponential Decay.
* Model Uses URBAN Dispersion Algorithm for the SBL for 163 Source(s), for Total of 1 Urban Area(s):
Urban Population = 2035210.0 ; Urban Roughness Length = 1.000 m * Urban Roughness Length of 1.0 Meter Used.
* ADJ_U* - Use ADJ_U* option for SBL in AERMET
* CCVR_Sub - Meteorological data includes CCVR substitutions * TEMP_Sub - Meteorological data includes TEMP substitutions * Model Assumes No FLAGPOLE Receptor Heights.
* The User Specified a Pollutant Type of: DPM
**Model Calculates PERIOD Averages Only
**This Run Includes: 163 Source(s); 1 Source Group(s); and 65 Receptor(s) with: 0 POINT(s), including
0 POINTCAP(s) and 0 POINTHOR(s)
and: 163 VOLUME source(s)
and: 0 AREA type source(s)
and: 0 LINE source(s)
and: 0 RLINE/RLINEXT source(s)
and: 0 OPENPIT source(s)
and: 0 BUOYANT LINE source(s) with a total of 0 line(s) and: 0 SWPOINT source(s)
**Model Set To Continue RUNning After the Setup Testing. **The AERMET Input Meteorological Data Version Date: 16216 **Output Options Selected:
Model Outputs Tables of PERIOD Averages by Receptor
Model Outputs External File(s) of High Values for Plotting (PLOTFILE Keyword) Model Outputs Separate Summary File of High Ranked Values (SUMMFILE Keyword) **NOTE: The Following Flags May Appear Following CONC Values: c for Calm Hours m for Missing Hours
b for Both Calm and Missing
Hours
**Misc. Inputs: Base Elev. for Pot. Temp. Profile (m MSL) = 289.00 ; Decay Coef. =
0.000 ; Rot. Angle = 0.0
Emission Units = GRAMS/SEC ; Emission Rate
Unit Factor = 0.10000E+07
Output Units = MICROGRAMS/M**3
**Approximate Storage Requirements of Model = 3.6 MB of RAM. **Input Runstream File:
aermod.inp
**Output Print File:
aermod.out
4109
**Detailed Error/Message File: 14539
Construction.err
**File for Summary of Results: 14539
Construction.sum
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 2
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000001 0 0.16230E-05 450538.5 3769231.7 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000002 0 0.16230E-05 450552.5 3769231.6 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000003 0 0.16230E-05 450566.5 3769231.5 298.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000004 0 0.16230E-05 450580.5 3769231.4 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000005 0 0.16230E-05 450594.5 3769231.3 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000006 0 0.16230E-05 450608.5 3769231.2 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000007 0 0.16230E-05 450622.5 3769231.1 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000008 0 0.16230E-05 450636.5 3769231.0 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000009 0 0.16230E-05 450650.5 3769230.8 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000010 0 0.16230E-05 450664.5 3769230.7 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000011 0 0.16230E-05 450678.5 3769230.6 298.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000012 0 0.16230E-05 450692.5 3769230.5 298.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000013 0 0.16230E-05 450706.5 3769230.4 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000014 0 0.16230E-05 450720.5 3769230.3 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000015 0 0.16230E-05 450734.5 3769230.2 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000016 0 0.16230E-05 450748.5 3769230.1 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000017 0 0.16230E-05 450762.5 3769230.0 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000018 0 0.16230E-05 450776.5 3769229.8 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000019 0 0.16230E-05 450790.5 3769229.7 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000020 0 0.16230E-05 450804.5 3769229.6 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000021 0 0.16230E-05 450818.5 3769229.5 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4110
L0000022 0 0.16230E-05 450832.5 3769229.4 298.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000023 0 0.16230E-05 450846.5 3769229.3 298.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000024 0 0.16230E-05 450860.5 3769229.2 298.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000025 0 0.16230E-05 450874.5 3769229.1 297.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000026 0 0.16230E-05 450888.5 3769229.0 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000027 0 0.16230E-05 450902.5 3769228.9 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000028 0 0.16230E-05 450916.5 3769228.7 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000029 0 0.16230E-05 450930.5 3769228.6 297.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000030 0 0.16230E-05 450944.5 3769228.5 297.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000031 0 0.16230E-05 450958.5 3769228.4 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000032 0 0.16230E-05 450972.5 3769228.3 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000033 0 0.16230E-05 450986.5 3769228.2 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000034 0 0.16230E-05 451000.5 3769228.1 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000035 0 0.16230E-05 451014.5 3769228.0 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000036 0 0.16230E-05 451028.5 3769227.9 297.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000037 0 0.16230E-05 451042.5 3769227.8 296.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000038 0 0.16230E-05 451056.5 3769227.6 296.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000039 0 0.16230E-05 451070.5 3769227.5 296.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000040 0 0.16230E-05 451084.5 3769227.4 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 3
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000041 0 0.16230E-05 451098.5 3769227.3 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000042 0 0.16230E-05 451112.5 3769227.2 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000043 0 0.16230E-05 451126.5 3769227.1 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000044 0 0.16230E-05 451140.5 3769227.0 296.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4111
L0000045 0 0.16230E-05 451154.5 3769226.9 296.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000046 0 0.16230E-05 451168.5 3769226.8 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000047 0 0.16230E-05 451182.5 3769226.6 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000048 0 0.16230E-05 451196.5 3769226.5 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000049 0 0.16230E-05 451210.5 3769226.4 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000050 0 0.16230E-05 451224.5 3769226.3 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000051 0 0.16230E-05 451238.5 3769226.2 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000052 0 0.16230E-05 451252.5 3769226.1 296.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000053 0 0.16230E-05 451266.5 3769226.0 296.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000054 0 0.16230E-05 451280.5 3769225.9 295.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000055 0 0.16230E-05 451294.5 3769225.8 295.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000056 0 0.16230E-05 451308.5 3769225.7 295.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000057 0 0.16230E-05 451322.5 3769225.5 295.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000058 0 0.16230E-05 451336.5 3769225.4 295.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000059 0 0.16230E-05 451350.5 3769225.3 295.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000060 0 0.16230E-05 451364.5 3769225.2 295.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000061 0 0.16230E-05 451378.5 3769225.1 296.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000062 0 0.16230E-05 451392.5 3769225.0 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000063 0 0.16230E-05 451406.5 3769224.9 296.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000064 0 0.16230E-05 451420.5 3769224.8 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000065 0 0.16230E-05 451434.5 3769224.7 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000066 0 0.16230E-05 451448.5 3769224.6 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000067 0 0.16230E-05 451462.4 3769224.2 297.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000068 0 0.16230E-05 451476.4 3769223.1 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000069 0 0.16230E-05 451489.6 3769218.6 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000070 0 0.16230E-05 451502.7 3769213.6 297.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000071 0 0.16230E-05 451515.7 3769208.5 297.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000072 0 0.16230E-05 451528.8 3769203.5 297.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000073 0 0.16230E-05 451541.8 3769198.4 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000074 0 0.16230E-05 451554.9 3769193.3 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000075 0 0.16230E-05 451567.9 3769188.3 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000076 0 0.16230E-05 451581.1 3769183.4 297.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000077 0 0.16230E-05 451594.6 3769180.0 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4112
L0000078 0 0.16230E-05 451608.4 3769178.0 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000079 0 0.16230E-05 451622.4 3769177.1 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000080 0 0.16230E-05 451631.0 3769182.8 297.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 4
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000081 0 0.16230E-05 451632.8 3769196.6 298.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000082 0 0.16230E-05 451633.8 3769210.6 298.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000083 0 0.16230E-05 451633.7 3769224.6 298.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000084 0 0.16230E-05 451633.6 3769238.6 299.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000085 0 0.16230E-05 451633.5 3769252.6 299.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000086 0 0.16230E-05 451633.5 3769266.6 300.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000087 0 0.16230E-05 451633.4 3769280.6 301.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000088 0 0.16230E-05 451633.3 3769294.6 301.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000089 0 0.16230E-05 451633.2 3769308.6 302.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000090 0 0.16230E-05 451633.1 3769322.6 303.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000091 0 0.16230E-05 451633.0 3769336.6 304.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000092 0 0.16230E-05 451632.9 3769350.6 305.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000093 0 0.16230E-05 451632.8 3769364.6 307.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000094 0 0.16230E-05 451632.8 3769378.6 307.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000095 0 0.16230E-05 451633.0 3769392.6 307.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000096 0 0.16230E-05 451633.2 3769406.6 306.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000097 0 0.16230E-05 451633.5 3769420.6 305.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000098 0 0.16230E-05 451633.7 3769434.6 305.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000099 0 0.16230E-05 451633.9 3769448.6 304.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000100 0 0.16230E-05 451634.2 3769462.6 305.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4113
L0000101 0 0.16230E-05 451634.4 3769476.6 305.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000102 0 0.16230E-05 451634.7 3769490.6 305.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000103 0 0.16230E-05 451635.0 3769504.5 306.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000104 0 0.16230E-05 451635.4 3769518.5 306.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000105 0 0.16230E-05 451635.8 3769532.5 306.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000106 0 0.16230E-05 451636.2 3769546.5 306.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000107 0 0.16230E-05 451636.5 3769560.5 306.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000108 0 0.16230E-05 451636.9 3769574.5 306.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000109 0 0.16230E-05 451637.3 3769588.5 307.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000110 0 0.16230E-05 451637.6 3769602.5 307.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000111 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769616.5 307.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000112 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769630.5 307.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000113 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769644.5 307.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000114 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769658.5 306.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000115 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769672.5 305.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000116 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769686.5 305.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000117 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769700.5 304.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000118 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769714.5 304.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000119 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769728.5 304.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000120 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769742.5 304.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 5
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000121 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769756.5 304.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000122 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769770.5 305.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000123 0 0.16230E-05 451637.9 3769784.5 305.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4114
L0000124 0 0.16230E-05 451638.3 3769798.5 306.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000125 0 0.16230E-05 451638.8 3769812.5 307.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000126 0 0.16230E-05 451639.3 3769826.5 307.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000127 0 0.16230E-05 451639.7 3769840.5 307.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000128 0 0.16230E-05 451640.2 3769854.5 307.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000129 0 0.16230E-05 451640.7 3769868.5 308.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000130 0 0.16230E-05 451641.1 3769882.5 308.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000131 0 0.16230E-05 451641.6 3769896.4 308.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000132 0 0.16230E-05 451642.1 3769910.4 307.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
VOL1 0 0.13707E-03 450539.6 3769359.4 299.6 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL2 0 0.13707E-03 450585.4 3769360.2 299.4 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL3 0 0.13707E-03 450631.3 3769361.1 299.3 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL4 0 0.13707E-03 450676.3 3769362.8 299.3 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL5 0 0.13707E-03 450722.2 3769364.5 299.3 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL6 0 0.13707E-03 450768.0 3769365.3 299.3 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL7 0 0.13707E-03 450814.3 3769366.2 299.3 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL8 0 0.13707E-03 450846.6 3769383.2 299.7 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL9 0 0.13707E-03 450865.3 3769338.6 299.2 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL10 0 0.13707E-03 450865.3 3769385.3 299.6 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL11 0 0.13707E-03 450819.8 3769337.3 299.0 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL12 0 0.13707E-03 450774.0 3769320.7 298.9 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL13 0 0.13707E-03 450728.5 3769319.5 298.8 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL14 0 0.13707E-03 450682.7 3769319.5 298.8 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL15 0 0.13707E-03 450637.2 3769317.3 298.8 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL16 0 0.13707E-03 450591.8 3769315.2 298.8 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL17 0 0.13707E-03 450544.2 3769314.8 299.1 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL18 0 0.13707E-03 450542.1 3769267.2 298.6 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL19 0 0.13707E-03 450590.1 3769266.8 298.5 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL20 0 0.13707E-03 450634.3 3769274.4 298.7 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL21 0 0.13707E-03 450680.1 3769274.9 298.7 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL22 0 0.13707E-03 450724.7 3769273.6 298.4 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL23 0 0.13707E-03 450768.0 3769274.9 298.3 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL24 0 0.13707E-03 450814.7 3769291.0 298.4 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO 4115
VOL25 0 0.13707E-03 450862.7 3769293.1 298.7 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL26 0 0.13707E-03 450634.7 3769266.0 298.7 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL27 0 0.13707E-03 450681.4 3769264.7 298.7 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL28 0 0.13707E-03 450728.1 3769266.0 298.4 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 6
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
VOL29 0 0.13707E-03 450773.5 3769267.2 298.3 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL30 0 0.13707E-03 450816.4 3769266.8 298.2 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
VOL31 0 0.13707E-03 450864.0 3769266.4 298.4 5.00 10.67 1.40 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 7
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS ***
SRCGROUP ID SOURCE IDs
----------- ----------
ALL L0000001 , L0000002 , L0000003 , L0000004 , L0000005 , L0000006 , L0000007 , L0000008 ,
L0000009 , L0000010 , L0000011 , L0000012 , L0000013 , L0000014 , L0000015 , L0000016 ,
L0000017 , L0000018 , L0000019 , L0000020 , L0000021 , L0000022 , L0000023 , L0000024 ,
L0000025 , L0000026 , L0000027 , L0000028 , L0000029 , L0000030 , L0000031 , L0000032 ,
L0000033 , L0000034 , L0000035 , L0000036 , L0000037 , L0000038 , L0000039 , L0000040 ,
L0000041 , L0000042 , L0000043 , L0000044 , L0000045 , L0000046 , L0000047 , L0000048 , 4116
L0000049 , L0000050 , L0000051 , L0000052 , L0000053 , L0000054 , L0000055 , L0000056 ,
L0000057 , L0000058 , L0000059 , L0000060 , L0000061 , L0000062 , L0000063 , L0000064 ,
L0000065 , L0000066 , L0000067 , L0000068 , L0000069 , L0000070 , L0000071 , L0000072 ,
L0000073 , L0000074 , L0000075 , L0000076 , L0000077 , L0000078 , L0000079 , L0000080 ,
L0000081 , L0000082 , L0000083 , L0000084 , L0000085 , L0000086 , L0000087 , L0000088 ,
L0000089 , L0000090 , L0000091 , L0000092 , L0000093 , L0000094 , L0000095 , L0000096 ,
L0000097 , L0000098 , L0000099 , L0000100 , L0000101 , L0000102 , L0000103 , L0000104 ,
L0000105 , L0000106 , L0000107 , L0000108 , L0000109 , L0000110 , L0000111 , L0000112 ,
L0000113 , L0000114 , L0000115 , L0000116 , L0000117 , L0000118 , L0000119 , L0000120 ,
L0000121 , L0000122 , L0000123 , L0000124 , L0000125 , L0000126 , L0000127 , L0000128 ,
L0000129 , L0000130 , L0000131 , L0000132 , VOL1 , VOL2 , VOL3 , VOL4 ,
VOL5 , VOL6 , VOL7 , VOL8 , VOL9 , VOL10 ,
VOL11 , VOL12 ,
VOL13 , VOL14 , VOL15 , VOL16 , VOL17 , VOL18 ,
VOL19 , VOL20 ,
VOL21 , VOL22 , VOL23 , VOL24 , VOL25 , VOL26 ,
VOL27 , VOL28 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 8
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS ***
SRCGROUP ID SOURCE IDs
----------- ----------
VOL29 , VOL30 , VOL31 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 9
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
4117
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINED AS URBAN SOURCES ***
URBAN ID URBAN POP SOURCE IDs
-------- --------- ----------
2035210. L0000001 , L0000002 , L0000003 , L0000004 , L0000005 , L0000006 , L0000007 ,
L0000008 ,
L0000009 , L0000010 , L0000011 , L0000012 , L0000013 , L0000014 , L0000015 , L0000016 ,
L0000017 , L0000018 , L0000019 , L0000020 , L0000021 , L0000022 , L0000023 , L0000024 ,
L0000025 , L0000026 , L0000027 , L0000028 , L0000029 , L0000030 , L0000031 , L0000032 ,
L0000033 , L0000034 , L0000035 , L0000036 , L0000037 , L0000038 , L0000039 , L0000040 ,
L0000041 , L0000042 , L0000043 , L0000044 , L0000045 , L0000046 , L0000047 , L0000048 ,
L0000049 , L0000050 , L0000051 , L0000052 , L0000053 , L0000054 , L0000055 , L0000056 ,
L0000057 , L0000058 , L0000059 , L0000060 , L0000061 , L0000062 , L0000063 , L0000064 ,
L0000065 , L0000066 , L0000067 , L0000068 , L0000069 , L0000070 , L0000071 , L0000072 ,
L0000073 , L0000074 , L0000075 , L0000076 , L0000077 , L0000078 , L0000079 , L0000080 ,
L0000081 , L0000082 , L0000083 , L0000084 , L0000085 , L0000086 , L0000087 , L0000088 ,
L0000089 , L0000090 , L0000091 , L0000092 , L0000093 , L0000094 , L0000095 , L0000096 ,
L0000097 , L0000098 , L0000099 , L0000100 , L0000101 , L0000102 , L0000103 , L0000104 ,
L0000105 , L0000106 , L0000107 , L0000108 , L0000109 , L0000110 , L0000111 , L0000112 ,
L0000113 , L0000114 , L0000115 , L0000116 , L0000117 , L0000118 , L0000119 , L0000120 ,
L0000121 , L0000122 , L0000123 , L0000124 , L0000125 , L0000126 , L0000127 , L0000128 ,
L0000129 , L0000130 , L0000131 , L0000132 , VOL1 , VOL2 , VOL3 , VOL4 ,
VOL5 , VOL6 , VOL7 , VOL8 , VOL9 , VOL10 ,
VOL11 , VOL12 ,
VOL13 , VOL14 , VOL15 , VOL16 , VOL17 , VOL18 ,
VOL19 , VOL20 ,
VOL21 , VOL22 , VOL23 , VOL24 , VOL25 , VOL26 , 4118
VOL27 , VOL28 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 10
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINED AS URBAN SOURCES ***
URBAN ID URBAN POP SOURCE IDs
-------- --------- ----------
VOL29 , VOL30 , VOL31 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 11
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
(X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
(METERS)
( 450497.4, 3769490.5, 301.2, 301.2, 0.0); ( 450800.7, 3769496.4, 301.2, 301.2, 0.0);
( 450844.7, 3769482.7, 300.8, 300.8, 0.0); ( 450443.3, 3769464.3, 300.9, 300.9, 0.0);
( 450501.5, 3769327.5, 299.2, 299.2, 0.0); ( 450500.6, 3769279.8, 298.7, 298.7, 0.0);
( 450904.5, 3769273.6, 298.7, 298.7, 0.0); ( 450904.5, 3769256.7, 298.3, 298.3, 0.0);
( 451224.7, 3769252.7, 296.5, 296.5, 0.0); ( 451223.3, 3769282.5, 297.0, 297.0, 0.0);
( 451085.8, 3769299.7, 297.7, 297.7, 0.0); ( 451203.8, 3769285.4, 297.1, 297.1, 0.0);
( 450660.4, 3769097.0, 298.3, 298.3, 0.0); ( 451202.0, 3769091.5, 294.3, 294.3, 0.0);
( 450843.3, 3769093.9, 296.0, 296.0, 0.0); ( 451065.3, 3769091.5, 295.0, 295.0, 0.0);
( 450488.4, 3769125.6, 297.5, 297.5, 0.0); ( 450365.0, 3769200.8, 297.4, 297.4, 0.0);
( 449491.0, 3769987.6, 306.4, 306.4, 0.0); ( 451310.5, 3769494.7, 298.9, 298.9, 0.0);
( 451571.6, 3769299.6, 300.9, 300.9, 0.0); ( 451412.2, 3769298.4, 297.6, 297.6, 0.0);
( 451467.2, 3769186.0, 296.7, 296.7, 0.0); ( 449272.9, 3769950.8, 304.9, 304.9, 0.0);
( 449463.3, 3769963.2, 305.9, 305.9, 0.0); ( 449418.9, 3769937.8, 305.4, 305.4, 0.0);
( 449134.5, 3770074.5, 305.9, 305.9, 0.0); ( 448757.9, 3770086.1, 305.4, 305.4, 0.0);
( 451123.0, 3769118.2, 295.2, 295.2, 0.0); ( 453236.6, 3767558.9, 279.1, 279.1, 0.0);
( 453308.3, 3767535.1, 279.2, 279.2, 0.0); ( 453281.0, 3767662.3, 280.5, 280.5, 0.0);
( 453784.7, 3767275.2, 274.3, 274.3, 0.0); ( 453764.7, 3767244.9, 273.9, 273.9, 0.0);
( 448293.4, 3770898.6, 316.0, 316.0, 0.0); ( 448374.2, 3771008.4, 318.1, 318.1, 0.0);
( 448407.8, 3771051.1, 318.9, 318.9, 0.0); ( 451567.7, 3769513.9, 4119 304.1, 304.1, 0.0);
( 451567.3, 3769558.7, 304.5, 304.5, 0.0); ( 451504.3, 3769499.8, 301.8, 301.8, 0.0);
( 451404.2, 3769478.0, 299.6, 299.6, 0.0); ( 451080.2, 3769366.8, 298.5, 298.5, 0.0);
( 451083.4, 3769345.3, 298.2, 298.2, 0.0); ( 451855.6, 3769413.3, 300.9, 300.9, 0.0);
( 451858.8, 3769297.5, 299.2, 299.2, 0.0); ( 451877.2, 3769588.2, 303.3, 303.3, 0.0);
( 451769.8, 3769173.3, 296.9, 296.9, 0.0); ( 451225.0, 3771073.4, 322.8, 322.8, 0.0);
( 451290.9, 3771093.6, 323.3, 323.3, 0.0); ( 451164.5, 3771074.8, 322.3, 322.3, 0.0);
( 451104.0, 3771097.6, 321.9, 321.9, 0.0); ( 451062.3, 3771139.3, 322.2, 322.2, 0.0);
( 451009.9, 3771061.3, 321.1, 321.1, 0.0); ( 448691.5, 3769705.9, 299.7, 299.7, 0.0);
( 449617.9, 3769283.1, 297.9, 297.9, 0.0); ( 448536.2, 3769286.4, 294.6, 294.6, 0.0);
( 449612.9, 3769208.8, 296.4, 296.4, 0.0); ( 450097.6, 3769277.4, 298.4, 298.4, 0.0);
( 450354.4, 3769284.8, 298.8, 298.8, 0.0); ( 450184.3, 3769203.9, 297.4, 297.4, 0.0);
( 449168.7, 3769208.8, 295.9, 295.9, 0.0); ( 448793.9, 3769211.3, 294.5, 294.5, 0.0);
( 448534.6, 3769957.7, 302.3, 302.3, 0.0); ( 448442.1, 3770018.0, 302.9, 302.9, 0.0);
( 448348.8, 3769949.5, 302.2, 302.2,
0.0);
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 12
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** METEOROLOGICAL DAYS SELECTED FOR PROCESSING ***
(1=YES; 0=NO)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NOTE: METEOROLOGICAL DATA ACTUALLY PROCESSED WILL ALSO DEPEND ON WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE DATA FILE.
*** UPPER BOUND OF FIRST THROUGH FIFTH WIND SPEED CATEGORIES ***
(METERS/SEC)
1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80, 4120
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 13
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** UP TO THE FIRST 24 HOURS OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA *** Surface file:
KONT_V9_ADJU\KONT_v9.SFC Met
Version: 16216
Profile file:
KONT_V9_ADJU\KONT_v9.PFL
Surface format:
FREE
Profile format:
FREE
Surface station no.: 3102 Upper air station no.: 3190
Name: UNKNOWN Name:
UNKNOWN
Year: 2012 Year: 2012
First 24 hours of scalar data
YR MO DY JDY HR H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS
WD HT REF TA HT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12 01 01 1 01 -16.4 0.171 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 170. 32.3 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.03
43. 7.9 285.9 2.0
12 01 01 1 02 -18.8 0.194 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 205. 41.3 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.28
34. 7.9 285.4 2.0
12 01 01 1 03 -17.8 0.182 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 187. 36.5 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.15
24. 7.9 282.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 04 -9.4 0.128 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 110. 19.6 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.55
41. 7.9 283.1 2.0
12 01 01 1 05 -16.9 0.173 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 173. 33.0 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.05
39. 7.9 280.4 2.0
12 01 01 1 06 -8.0 0.117 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 97. 17.8 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.43
21. 7.9 282.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 07 -7.6 0.115 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 93. 17.4 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.40
31. 7.9 282.5 2.0
12 01 01 1 08 -13.6 0.184 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 190. 40.5 0.09 1.12 0.54 2.16
34. 7.9 284.2 2.0
12 01 01 1 09 28.4 0.126 0.300 0.011 33. 108. -6.2 0.09 1.12 0.32 1.03
29. 7.9 289.2 2.0
12 01 01 1 10 79.8 0.133 0.607 0.010 99. 116. -2.6 0.09 1.12 0.25 0.94 173. 7.9 292.5 2.0
12 01 01 1 11 115.8 0.137 0.932 0.006 246. 121. -2.0 0.09 1.12 0.22 0.92 172. 7.9 295.4 2.0
12 01 01 1 12 133.7 0.139 1.197 0.005 453. 125. -1.8 0.09 1.12 0.21 0.92 146. 7.9 297.5 2.0
12 01 01 1 13 133.2 0.160 1.354 0.005 657. 153. -2.7 0.09 1.12 0.21 1.14 117. 7.9 299.9 2.0
12 01 01 1 14 113.5 0.159 1.454 0.005 955. 151. -3.1 0.09 1.12 0.23 1.16 285. 7.9 300.9 2.0
12 01 01 1 15 76.2 0.166 1.350 0.005 1138. 163. -5.3 0.09 1.12 0.26 1.33
72. 7.9 302.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 16 23.5 0.175 0.925 0.005 1183. 175. -19.9 0.09 1.12 0.35 1.65 107. 7.9 301.4 2.0
12 01 01 1 17 -6.1 0.107 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 86. 18.0 0.09 1.12 0.63 1.31 107. 7.9 298.1 2.0
12 01 01 1 18 -11.1 0.141 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 127. 22.1 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.69 4121
86. 7.9 293.1 2.0
12 01 01 1 19 -3.2 0.076 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 51. 11.8 0.09 1.12 1.00 0.91
64. 7.9 292.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 20 -2.3 0.066 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 41. 11.2 0.09 1.12 1.00 0.74
73. 7.9 288.8 2.0
12 01 01 1 21 -10.0 0.133 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 116. 20.5 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.60
14. 7.9 288.1 2.0
12 01 01 1 22 -19.4 0.201 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 216. 44.5 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.36
22. 7.9 287.5 2.0
12 01 01 1 23 -23.7 0.246 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 293. 66.5 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.86
40. 7.9 287.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 24 -12.3 0.147 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 139. 23.8 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.76
40. 7.9 283.8 2.0
First hour of profile data
YR MO DY HR HEIGHT F WDIR WSPD AMB_TMP sigmaA sigmaW sigmaV 12 01 01 01 7.9 1 43. 2.03 286.0 99.0 -99.00 -99.00
F indicates top of profile (=1) or below (=0)
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 14
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** THE PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
INCLUDING SOURCE(S): L0000001 , L0000002 ,
L0000003 , L0000004 , L0000005 ,
L0000006 , L0000007 , L0000008 , L0000009 , L0000010 ,
L0000011 , L0000012 , L0000013 ,
L0000014 , L0000015 , L0000016 , L0000017 , L0000018 ,
L0000019 , L0000020 , L0000021 ,
L0000022 , L0000023 , L0000024 , L0000025 , L0000026 ,
L0000027 , L0000028 , . . . ,
*** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
** CONC OF DPM IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
450497.39 3769490.46 0.03387 450800.72
3769496.41 0.07330
450844.74 3769482.73 0.08628 450443.26
3769464.29 0.02976
450501.53 3769327.46 0.11396 450500.56
3769279.81 0.11254
450904.52 3769273.57 0.22776 450904.52
3769256.68 0.17983
451224.66 3769252.72 0.03047 451223.34
3769282.54 0.03025
451085.83 3769299.70 0.05469 451203.81
3769285.44 0.03233
450660.39 3769097.00 0.05456 451201.96
3769091.46 0.01514
450843.34 3769093.95 0.04279 451065.35
3769091.46 0.02139
450488.39 3769125.56 0.04294 450365.04
3769200.78 0.02731 4122
449490.95 3769987.56 0.00165 451310.46
3769494.69 0.02701
451571.63 3769299.56 0.01510 451412.20
3769298.37 0.01901
451467.16 3769185.97 0.01507 449272.92
3769950.83 0.00141
449463.32 3769963.25 0.00165 449418.90
3769937.78 0.00162
449134.45 3770074.53 0.00116 448757.86
3770086.14 0.00089
451123.04 3769118.25 0.02029 453236.59
3767558.94 0.00064
453308.35 3767535.11 0.00062 453281.04
3767662.29 0.00065
453784.70 3767275.20 0.00047 453764.70
3767244.94 0.00047
448293.38 3770898.58 0.00046 448374.25
3771008.42 0.00045
448407.77 3771051.14 0.00044 451567.70
3769513.90 0.01815
451567.29 3769558.70 0.01845 451504.33
3769499.78 0.01787
451404.23 3769477.98 0.02177 451080.25
3769366.84 0.06648
451083.41 3769345.35 0.06318 451855.58
3769413.29 0.00926
451858.79 3769297.51 0.00793 451877.19
3769588.22 0.00974
451769.79 3769173.32 0.00738 451225.00
3771073.42 0.00096
451290.87 3771093.58 0.00095 451164.51
3771074.76 0.00095
451104.02 3771097.62 0.00092 451062.35
3771139.29 0.00087
451009.92 3771061.32 0.00094 448691.48
3769705.89 0.00108
449617.88 3769283.15 0.00324 448536.25
3769286.45 0.00103
449612.93 3769208.84 0.00325 450097.60
3769277.37 0.00898
450354.38 3769284.80 0.02640 450184.29
3769203.88 0.01205
449168.72 3769208.84 0.00183 448793.86
3769211.31 0.00127
448534.60 3769957.72 0.00091 448442.13
3770017.99 0.00084
448348.82 3769949.46
0.00081
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 15
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** THE SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM PERIOD ( 43848 HRS) RESULTS
***
** CONC OF DPM IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
NETWORK 4123
GROUP ID AVERAGE CONC RECEPTOR (XR, YR, ZELEV, ZHILL,
ZFLAG) OF TYPE GRID-ID
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ALL 1ST HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.22776 AT ( 450904.52, 3769273.57, 298.65, 298.65, 0.00) DC
2ND HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.17983 AT ( 450904.52, 3769256.68, 298.30, 298.30, 0.00) DC
3RD HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.11396 AT ( 450501.53, 3769327.46, 299.22, 299.22, 0.00) DC
4TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.11254 AT ( 450500.56, 3769279.81, 298.74, 298.74, 0.00) DC
5TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.08628 AT ( 450844.74, 3769482.73, 300.84, 300.84, 0.00) DC
6TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.07330 AT ( 450800.72, 3769496.41, 301.24, 301.24, 0.00) DC
7TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.06648 AT ( 451080.25, 3769366.84, 298.50, 298.50, 0.00) DC
8TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.06318 AT ( 451083.41, 3769345.35, 298.25, 298.25, 0.00) DC
9TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.05469 AT ( 451085.83, 3769299.70, 297.72, 297.72, 0.00) DC
10TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.05456 AT ( 450660.39, 3769097.00, 298.29, 298.29, 0.00) DC
*** RECEPTOR TYPES: GC = GRIDCART
GP = GRIDPOLR
DC = DISCCART
DP = DISCPOLR
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 15:47:13
PAGE 16
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** Message Summary : AERMOD Model Execution ***
--------- Summary of Total Messages --------
A Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s)
A Total of 2 Warning Message(s)
A Total of 1628 Informational Message(s)
A Total of 43848 Hours Were Processed
A Total of 1278 Calm Hours Identified
A Total of 350 Missing Hours Identified ( 0.80 Percent) ******** FATAL ERROR MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
ME W186 416 MEOPEN: THRESH_1MIN 1-min ASOS wind speed threshold used 0.50 ME W187 416 MEOPEN: ADJ_U* Option for Stable Low Winds used in AERMET ************************************
*** AERMOD Finishes Successfully ***
************************************
4124
** Lakes Environmental AERMOD MPI
**
****************************************
**
** AERMOD Input Produced by:
** AERMOD View Ver. 12.0.0
** Lakes Environmental Software Inc.
** Date: 10/28/2024
** File: C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops\14539 Ops.ADI **
****************************************
**
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Control Pathway
****************************************
**
**
CO STARTING
TITLEONE C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops
MODELOPT DFAULT CONC
AVERTIME ANNUAL
URBANOPT 2035210 San_Bernadino_County
POLLUTID DPM
RUNORNOT RUN
ERRORFIL "14539 Ops.err"
CO FINISHED
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Source Pathway
****************************************
**
**
SO STARTING
** Source Location **
** Source ID - Type - X Coord. - Y Coord. **
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE1
** DESCRSRC Idling
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 8.59
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 0.00004517
** Vertical Dimension = 6.99
** SZINIT = 3.25
** Nodes = 2
** 450584.276, 3769293.332, 298.63, 3.49, 4.00
** 450819.830, 3769300.271, 298.67, 3.49, 4.00
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000338 VOLUME 450588.570 3769293.458 298.57
LOCATION L0000339 VOLUME 450597.156 3769293.711 298.58
LOCATION L0000340 VOLUME 450605.742 3769293.964 298.58
LOCATION L0000341 VOLUME 450614.328 3769294.217 298.60
LOCATION L0000342 VOLUME 450622.915 3769294.470 298.64
LOCATION L0000343 VOLUME 450631.501 3769294.723 298.67
LOCATION L0000344 VOLUME 450640.087 3769294.976 298.70
LOCATION L0000345 VOLUME 450648.673 3769295.229 298.70
LOCATION L0000346 VOLUME 450657.260 3769295.482 298.70
LOCATION L0000347 VOLUME 450665.846 3769295.735 298.70
LOCATION L0000348 VOLUME 450674.432 3769295.988 298.70
LOCATION L0000349 VOLUME 450683.019 3769296.241 298.70
LOCATION L0000350 VOLUME 450691.605 3769296.494 298.70
LOCATION L0000351 VOLUME 450700.191 3769296.746 298.70
LOCATION L0000352 VOLUME 450708.777 3769296.999 298.67
LOCATION L0000353 VOLUME 450717.364 3769297.252 298.65 4125 LOCATION L0000354 VOLUME 450725.950 3769297.505 298.62
LOCATION L0000355 VOLUME 450734.536 3769297.758 298.62
LOCATION L0000356 VOLUME 450743.122 3769298.011 298.62
LOCATION L0000357 VOLUME 450751.709 3769298.264 298.62
LOCATION L0000358 VOLUME 450760.295 3769298.517 298.62
LOCATION L0000359 VOLUME 450768.881 3769298.770 298.60
LOCATION L0000360 VOLUME 450777.468 3769299.023 298.59
LOCATION L0000361 VOLUME 450786.054 3769299.276 298.57
LOCATION L0000362 VOLUME 450794.640 3769299.529 298.57
LOCATION L0000363 VOLUME 450803.226 3769299.782 298.57
LOCATION L0000364 VOLUME 450811.813 3769300.035 298.58
** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE1
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2
** DESCRSRC Onsite
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 8.59
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 0.00001482
** Vertical Dimension = 6.99
** SZINIT = 3.25
** Nodes = 8
** 450532.053, 3769244.030, 298.41, 3.49, 4.00
** 450532.053, 3769261.560, 298.60, 3.49, 4.00
** 450581.355, 3769261.925, 298.54, 3.49, 4.00
** 450593.772, 3769274.707, 298.44, 3.49, 4.00
** 450781.484, 3769278.359, 298.14, 3.49, 4.00
** 450819.830, 3769274.342, 298.10, 3.49, 4.00
** 450875.340, 3769273.976, 298.68, 3.49, 4.00
** 450876.071, 3769245.856, 298.09, 3.49, 4.00
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000365 VOLUME 450532.053 3769248.325 298.42
LOCATION L0000366 VOLUME 450532.053 3769256.915 298.51
LOCATION L0000367 VOLUME 450535.998 3769261.589 298.55
LOCATION L0000368 VOLUME 450544.588 3769261.652 298.55
LOCATION L0000369 VOLUME 450553.178 3769261.716 298.55
LOCATION L0000370 VOLUME 450561.767 3769261.780 298.55
LOCATION L0000371 VOLUME 450570.357 3769261.843 298.55
LOCATION L0000372 VOLUME 450578.947 3769261.907 298.55
LOCATION L0000373 VOLUME 450585.662 3769266.359 298.50
LOCATION L0000374 VOLUME 450591.648 3769272.520 298.44
LOCATION L0000375 VOLUME 450599.313 3769274.815 298.41
LOCATION L0000376 VOLUME 450607.901 3769274.982 298.41
LOCATION L0000377 VOLUME 450616.489 3769275.149 298.48
LOCATION L0000378 VOLUME 450625.078 3769275.316 298.56
LOCATION L0000379 VOLUME 450633.666 3769275.483 298.65
LOCATION L0000380 VOLUME 450642.254 3769275.650 298.70
LOCATION L0000381 VOLUME 450650.843 3769275.817 298.70
LOCATION L0000382 VOLUME 450659.431 3769275.984 298.70
LOCATION L0000383 VOLUME 450668.020 3769276.151 298.70
LOCATION L0000384 VOLUME 450676.608 3769276.318 298.70
LOCATION L0000385 VOLUME 450685.196 3769276.485 298.70
LOCATION L0000386 VOLUME 450693.785 3769276.652 298.70
LOCATION L0000387 VOLUME 450702.373 3769276.820 298.68
LOCATION L0000388 VOLUME 450710.961 3769276.987 298.59
LOCATION L0000389 VOLUME 450719.550 3769277.154 298.51
LOCATION L0000390 VOLUME 450728.138 3769277.321 298.42
LOCATION L0000391 VOLUME 450736.727 3769277.488 298.41
LOCATION L0000392 VOLUME 450745.315 3769277.655 298.41
LOCATION L0000393 VOLUME 450753.903 3769277.822 298.41
LOCATION L0000394 VOLUME 450762.492 3769277.989 298.39
LOCATION L0000395 VOLUME 450771.080 3769278.156 298.31
LOCATION L0000396 VOLUME 450779.668 3769278.323 298.23
LOCATION L0000397 VOLUME 450788.221 3769277.653 298.13
LOCATION L0000398 VOLUME 450796.764 3769276.758 298.10 4126 LOCATION L0000399 VOLUME 450805.308 3769275.863 298.10
LOCATION L0000400 VOLUME 450813.851 3769274.968 298.11
LOCATION L0000401 VOLUME 450822.408 3769274.325 298.14
LOCATION L0000402 VOLUME 450830.998 3769274.268 298.22
LOCATION L0000403 VOLUME 450839.588 3769274.212 298.29
LOCATION L0000404 VOLUME 450848.178 3769274.155 298.37
LOCATION L0000405 VOLUME 450856.767 3769274.099 298.44
LOCATION L0000406 VOLUME 450865.357 3769274.042 298.52
LOCATION L0000407 VOLUME 450873.947 3769273.985 298.60
LOCATION L0000408 VOLUME 450875.527 3769266.782 298.48
LOCATION L0000409 VOLUME 450875.750 3769258.195 298.32
LOCATION L0000410 VOLUME 450875.973 3769249.608 298.16
** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3
** DESCRSRC Offsite
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 14.00
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 0.00001217
** Vertical Dimension = 6.99
** SZINIT = 3.25
** Nodes = 14
** 450531.488, 3769231.780, 298.42, 3.49, 6.51
** 451458.160, 3769224.475, 296.68, 3.49, 6.51
** 451477.884, 3769223.014, 297.16, 3.49, 6.51
** 451508.566, 3769211.326, 297.73, 3.49, 6.51
** 451579.062, 3769183.931, 297.18, 3.49, 6.51
** 451600.612, 3769178.452, 297.61, 3.49, 6.51
** 451630.198, 3769176.626, 297.58, 3.49, 6.51
** 451633.851, 3769205.116, 298.46, 3.49, 6.51
** 451632.755, 3769377.520, 307.01, 3.49, 6.51
** 451633.851, 3769443.268, 304.95, 3.49, 6.51
** 451634.581, 3769487.099, 305.91, 3.49, 6.51
** 451637.869, 3769611.288, 307.59, 3.49, 6.51
** 451637.869, 3769784.058, 305.17, 3.49, 6.51
** 451642.335, 3769918.705, 307.93, 3.49, 6.51
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000738 VOLUME 450538.488 3769231.725 298.40
LOCATION L0000739 VOLUME 450552.488 3769231.615 298.43
LOCATION L0000740 VOLUME 450566.487 3769231.505 298.57
LOCATION L0000741 VOLUME 450580.487 3769231.394 298.70
LOCATION L0000742 VOLUME 450594.486 3769231.284 298.70
LOCATION L0000743 VOLUME 450608.486 3769231.173 298.70
LOCATION L0000744 VOLUME 450622.485 3769231.063 298.70
LOCATION L0000745 VOLUME 450636.485 3769230.953 298.70
LOCATION L0000746 VOLUME 450650.485 3769230.842 298.70
LOCATION L0000747 VOLUME 450664.484 3769230.732 298.70
LOCATION L0000748 VOLUME 450678.484 3769230.622 298.61
LOCATION L0000749 VOLUME 450692.483 3769230.511 298.47
LOCATION L0000750 VOLUME 450706.483 3769230.401 298.40
LOCATION L0000751 VOLUME 450720.482 3769230.291 298.40
LOCATION L0000752 VOLUME 450734.482 3769230.180 298.40
LOCATION L0000753 VOLUME 450748.481 3769230.070 298.40
LOCATION L0000754 VOLUME 450762.481 3769229.959 298.40
LOCATION L0000755 VOLUME 450776.481 3769229.849 298.40
LOCATION L0000756 VOLUME 450790.480 3769229.739 298.40
LOCATION L0000757 VOLUME 450804.480 3769229.628 298.40
LOCATION L0000758 VOLUME 450818.479 3769229.518 298.40
LOCATION L0000759 VOLUME 450832.479 3769229.408 298.34
LOCATION L0000760 VOLUME 450846.478 3769229.297 298.28
LOCATION L0000761 VOLUME 450860.478 3769229.187 298.08
LOCATION L0000762 VOLUME 450874.478 3769229.077 297.83
LOCATION L0000763 VOLUME 450888.477 3769228.966 297.74
LOCATION L0000764 VOLUME 450902.477 3769228.856 297.74 4127 LOCATION L0000765 VOLUME 450916.476 3769228.745 297.70
LOCATION L0000766 VOLUME 450930.476 3769228.635 297.61
LOCATION L0000767 VOLUME 450944.475 3769228.525 297.50
LOCATION L0000768 VOLUME 450958.475 3769228.414 297.36
LOCATION L0000769 VOLUME 450972.475 3769228.304 297.23
LOCATION L0000770 VOLUME 450986.474 3769228.194 297.17
LOCATION L0000771 VOLUME 451000.474 3769228.083 297.11
LOCATION L0000772 VOLUME 451014.473 3769227.973 297.05
LOCATION L0000773 VOLUME 451028.473 3769227.863 297.00
LOCATION L0000774 VOLUME 451042.472 3769227.752 296.91
LOCATION L0000775 VOLUME 451056.472 3769227.642 296.82
LOCATION L0000776 VOLUME 451070.471 3769227.531 296.76
LOCATION L0000777 VOLUME 451084.471 3769227.421 296.70
LOCATION L0000778 VOLUME 451098.471 3769227.311 296.68
LOCATION L0000779 VOLUME 451112.470 3769227.200 296.68
LOCATION L0000780 VOLUME 451126.470 3769227.090 296.63
LOCATION L0000781 VOLUME 451140.469 3769226.980 296.54
LOCATION L0000782 VOLUME 451154.469 3769226.869 296.46
LOCATION L0000783 VOLUME 451168.468 3769226.759 296.41
LOCATION L0000784 VOLUME 451182.468 3769226.649 296.37
LOCATION L0000785 VOLUME 451196.468 3769226.538 296.37
LOCATION L0000786 VOLUME 451210.467 3769226.428 296.36
LOCATION L0000787 VOLUME 451224.467 3769226.317 296.32
LOCATION L0000788 VOLUME 451238.466 3769226.207 296.27
LOCATION L0000789 VOLUME 451252.466 3769226.097 296.18
LOCATION L0000790 VOLUME 451266.465 3769225.986 296.08
LOCATION L0000791 VOLUME 451280.465 3769225.876 295.95
LOCATION L0000792 VOLUME 451294.465 3769225.766 295.80
LOCATION L0000793 VOLUME 451308.464 3769225.655 295.66
LOCATION L0000794 VOLUME 451322.464 3769225.545 295.52
LOCATION L0000795 VOLUME 451336.463 3769225.435 295.51
LOCATION L0000796 VOLUME 451350.463 3769225.324 295.66
LOCATION L0000797 VOLUME 451364.462 3769225.214 295.85
LOCATION L0000798 VOLUME 451378.462 3769225.103 296.13
LOCATION L0000799 VOLUME 451392.461 3769224.993 296.37
LOCATION L0000800 VOLUME 451406.461 3769224.883 296.48
LOCATION L0000801 VOLUME 451420.461 3769224.772 296.58
LOCATION L0000802 VOLUME 451434.460 3769224.662 296.65
LOCATION L0000803 VOLUME 451448.460 3769224.552 296.73
LOCATION L0000804 VOLUME 451462.448 3769224.158 296.96
LOCATION L0000805 VOLUME 451476.409 3769223.123 297.19
LOCATION L0000806 VOLUME 451489.585 3769218.556 297.41
LOCATION L0000807 VOLUME 451502.668 3769213.573 297.56
LOCATION L0000808 VOLUME 451515.732 3769208.541 297.47
LOCATION L0000809 VOLUME 451528.782 3769203.470 297.27
LOCATION L0000810 VOLUME 451541.831 3769198.399 297.11
LOCATION L0000811 VOLUME 451554.880 3769193.328 297.17
LOCATION L0000812 VOLUME 451567.930 3769188.257 297.23
LOCATION L0000813 VOLUME 451581.055 3769183.424 297.30
LOCATION L0000814 VOLUME 451594.624 3769179.975 297.39
LOCATION L0000815 VOLUME 451608.418 3769177.970 297.39
LOCATION L0000816 VOLUME 451622.392 3769177.108 297.39
LOCATION L0000817 VOLUME 451630.984 3769182.754 297.63
LOCATION L0000818 VOLUME 451632.764 3769196.640 298.07
LOCATION L0000819 VOLUME 451633.816 3769210.571 298.48
LOCATION L0000820 VOLUME 451633.727 3769224.571 298.95
LOCATION L0000821 VOLUME 451633.638 3769238.570 299.44
LOCATION L0000822 VOLUME 451633.549 3769252.570 299.94
LOCATION L0000823 VOLUME 451633.460 3769266.570 300.44
LOCATION L0000824 VOLUME 451633.371 3769280.570 301.02
LOCATION L0000825 VOLUME 451633.282 3769294.569 301.79
LOCATION L0000826 VOLUME 451633.193 3769308.569 302.60
LOCATION L0000827 VOLUME 451633.104 3769322.569 303.59
LOCATION L0000828 VOLUME 451633.015 3769336.568 304.59
LOCATION L0000829 VOLUME 451632.926 3769350.568 305.92
LOCATION L0000830 VOLUME 451632.837 3769364.568 307.24 4128 LOCATION L0000831 VOLUME 451632.773 3769378.567 307.33
LOCATION L0000832 VOLUME 451633.006 3769392.566 307.21
LOCATION L0000833 VOLUME 451633.239 3769406.564 306.54
LOCATION L0000834 VOLUME 451633.472 3769420.562 305.68
LOCATION L0000835 VOLUME 451633.706 3769434.560 305.17
LOCATION L0000836 VOLUME 451633.939 3769448.558 304.90
LOCATION L0000837 VOLUME 451634.172 3769462.556 304.97
LOCATION L0000838 VOLUME 451634.406 3769476.554 305.44
LOCATION L0000839 VOLUME 451634.673 3769490.551 305.91
LOCATION L0000840 VOLUME 451635.043 3769504.546 306.38
LOCATION L0000841 VOLUME 451635.414 3769518.541 306.72
LOCATION L0000842 VOLUME 451635.784 3769532.536 306.47
LOCATION L0000843 VOLUME 451636.155 3769546.532 306.23
LOCATION L0000844 VOLUME 451636.525 3769560.527 306.34
LOCATION L0000845 VOLUME 451636.896 3769574.522 306.46
LOCATION L0000846 VOLUME 451637.266 3769588.517 306.97
LOCATION L0000847 VOLUME 451637.636 3769602.512 307.53
LOCATION L0000848 VOLUME 451637.869 3769616.509 307.71
LOCATION L0000849 VOLUME 451637.869 3769630.509 307.75
LOCATION L0000850 VOLUME 451637.869 3769644.509 307.23
LOCATION L0000851 VOLUME 451637.869 3769658.509 306.32
LOCATION L0000852 VOLUME 451637.869 3769672.509 305.61
LOCATION L0000853 VOLUME 451637.869 3769686.509 305.13
LOCATION L0000854 VOLUME 451637.869 3769700.509 304.74
LOCATION L0000855 VOLUME 451637.869 3769714.509 304.53
LOCATION L0000856 VOLUME 451637.869 3769728.509 304.39
LOCATION L0000857 VOLUME 451637.869 3769742.509 304.60
LOCATION L0000858 VOLUME 451637.869 3769756.509 304.80
LOCATION L0000859 VOLUME 451637.869 3769770.509 305.06
LOCATION L0000860 VOLUME 451637.884 3769784.509 305.33
LOCATION L0000861 VOLUME 451638.348 3769798.501 306.17
LOCATION L0000862 VOLUME 451638.812 3769812.493 307.08
LOCATION L0000863 VOLUME 451639.276 3769826.486 307.41
LOCATION L0000864 VOLUME 451639.740 3769840.478 307.50
LOCATION L0000865 VOLUME 451640.205 3769854.470 307.84
LOCATION L0000866 VOLUME 451640.669 3769868.462 308.36
LOCATION L0000867 VOLUME 451641.133 3769882.455 308.51
LOCATION L0000868 VOLUME 451641.597 3769896.447 308.19
LOCATION L0000869 VOLUME 451642.061 3769910.439 307.84
** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** Line Source Represented by Adjacent Volume Sources
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE4
** DESCRSRC
** PREFIX
** Length of Side = 14.00
** Configuration = Adjacent
** Emission Rate = 0.000018
** Vertical Dimension = 6.99
** SZINIT = 3.25
** Nodes = 8
** 450529.627, 3769233.421, 298.42, 3.49, 6.51
** 449916.126, 3769241.027, 297.17, 3.49, 6.51
** 449643.346, 3769240.520, 297.13, 3.49, 6.51
** 449321.385, 3769244.576, 296.88, 3.49, 6.51
** 448802.191, 3769248.125, 295.04, 3.49, 6.51
** 448601.916, 3769250.153, 294.13, 3.49, 6.51
** 448490.344, 3769251.788, 293.77, 3.49, 6.51
** 448495.722, 3769948.190, 302.15, 3.49, 6.51
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- LOCATION L0000870 VOLUME 450522.628 3769233.508 298.40
LOCATION L0000871 VOLUME 450508.629 3769233.682 298.46
LOCATION L0000872 VOLUME 450494.630 3769233.855 298.55
LOCATION L0000873 VOLUME 450480.631 3769234.029 298.49
LOCATION L0000874 VOLUME 450466.632 3769234.202 298.35
LOCATION L0000875 VOLUME 450452.633 3769234.376 298.28 4129 LOCATION L0000876 VOLUME 450438.634 3769234.549 298.28
LOCATION L0000877 VOLUME 450424.635 3769234.723 298.26
LOCATION L0000878 VOLUME 450410.636 3769234.897 298.21
LOCATION L0000879 VOLUME 450396.637 3769235.070 298.15
LOCATION L0000880 VOLUME 450382.638 3769235.244 298.07
LOCATION L0000881 VOLUME 450368.639 3769235.417 297.98
LOCATION L0000882 VOLUME 450354.641 3769235.591 297.99
LOCATION L0000883 VOLUME 450340.642 3769235.764 297.99
LOCATION L0000884 VOLUME 450326.643 3769235.938 297.99
LOCATION L0000885 VOLUME 450312.644 3769236.111 297.99
LOCATION L0000886 VOLUME 450298.645 3769236.285 297.99
LOCATION L0000887 VOLUME 450284.646 3769236.458 297.99
LOCATION L0000888 VOLUME 450270.647 3769236.632 298.06
LOCATION L0000889 VOLUME 450256.648 3769236.805 298.16
LOCATION L0000890 VOLUME 450242.649 3769236.979 298.21
LOCATION L0000891 VOLUME 450228.650 3769237.153 298.21
LOCATION L0000892 VOLUME 450214.651 3769237.326 298.22
LOCATION L0000893 VOLUME 450200.652 3769237.500 298.22
LOCATION L0000894 VOLUME 450186.653 3769237.673 298.19
LOCATION L0000895 VOLUME 450172.655 3769237.847 298.06
LOCATION L0000896 VOLUME 450158.656 3769238.020 297.93
LOCATION L0000897 VOLUME 450144.657 3769238.194 297.93
LOCATION L0000898 VOLUME 450130.658 3769238.367 297.93
LOCATION L0000899 VOLUME 450116.659 3769238.541 297.84
LOCATION L0000900 VOLUME 450102.660 3769238.714 297.74
LOCATION L0000901 VOLUME 450088.661 3769238.888 297.71
LOCATION L0000902 VOLUME 450074.662 3769239.061 297.72
LOCATION L0000903 VOLUME 450060.663 3769239.235 297.63
LOCATION L0000904 VOLUME 450046.664 3769239.409 297.49
LOCATION L0000905 VOLUME 450032.665 3769239.582 297.42
LOCATION L0000906 VOLUME 450018.666 3769239.756 297.42
LOCATION L0000907 VOLUME 450004.667 3769239.929 297.42
LOCATION L0000908 VOLUME 449990.669 3769240.103 297.42
LOCATION L0000909 VOLUME 449976.670 3769240.276 297.42
LOCATION L0000910 VOLUME 449962.671 3769240.450 297.39
LOCATION L0000911 VOLUME 449948.672 3769240.623 297.36
LOCATION L0000912 VOLUME 449934.673 3769240.797 297.25
LOCATION L0000913 VOLUME 449920.674 3769240.970 297.14
LOCATION L0000914 VOLUME 449906.674 3769241.009 297.13
LOCATION L0000915 VOLUME 449892.674 3769240.983 297.13
LOCATION L0000916 VOLUME 449878.674 3769240.957 297.13
LOCATION L0000917 VOLUME 449864.674 3769240.931 297.13
LOCATION L0000918 VOLUME 449850.674 3769240.905 297.12
LOCATION L0000919 VOLUME 449836.674 3769240.879 297.12
LOCATION L0000920 VOLUME 449822.674 3769240.853 297.12
LOCATION L0000921 VOLUME 449808.674 3769240.827 297.12
LOCATION L0000922 VOLUME 449794.674 3769240.801 297.12
LOCATION L0000923 VOLUME 449780.674 3769240.775 297.12
LOCATION L0000924 VOLUME 449766.675 3769240.749 297.12
LOCATION L0000925 VOLUME 449752.675 3769240.723 297.09
LOCATION L0000926 VOLUME 449738.675 3769240.697 297.07
LOCATION L0000927 VOLUME 449724.675 3769240.671 297.06
LOCATION L0000928 VOLUME 449710.675 3769240.645 297.06
LOCATION L0000929 VOLUME 449696.675 3769240.619 297.04
LOCATION L0000930 VOLUME 449682.675 3769240.593 297.01
LOCATION L0000931 VOLUME 449668.675 3769240.567 297.03
LOCATION L0000932 VOLUME 449654.675 3769240.541 297.05
LOCATION L0000933 VOLUME 449640.675 3769240.553 297.06
LOCATION L0000934 VOLUME 449626.676 3769240.730 297.07
LOCATION L0000935 VOLUME 449612.677 3769240.906 297.13
LOCATION L0000936 VOLUME 449598.678 3769241.083 297.25
LOCATION L0000937 VOLUME 449584.679 3769241.259 297.34
LOCATION L0000938 VOLUME 449570.680 3769241.435 297.37
LOCATION L0000939 VOLUME 449556.682 3769241.612 297.41
LOCATION L0000940 VOLUME 449542.683 3769241.788 297.54
LOCATION L0000941 VOLUME 449528.684 3769241.964 297.65 4130 LOCATION L0000942 VOLUME 449514.685 3769242.141 297.55
LOCATION L0000943 VOLUME 449500.686 3769242.317 297.45
LOCATION L0000944 VOLUME 449486.687 3769242.493 297.45
LOCATION L0000945 VOLUME 449472.688 3769242.670 297.45
LOCATION L0000946 VOLUME 449458.689 3769242.846 297.45
LOCATION L0000947 VOLUME 449444.690 3769243.023 297.45
LOCATION L0000948 VOLUME 449430.692 3769243.199 297.44
LOCATION L0000949 VOLUME 449416.693 3769243.375 297.43
LOCATION L0000950 VOLUME 449402.694 3769243.552 297.37
LOCATION L0000951 VOLUME 449388.695 3769243.728 297.24
LOCATION L0000952 VOLUME 449374.696 3769243.904 297.16
LOCATION L0000953 VOLUME 449360.697 3769244.081 297.16
LOCATION L0000954 VOLUME 449346.698 3769244.257 297.13
LOCATION L0000955 VOLUME 449332.699 3769244.433 296.99
LOCATION L0000956 VOLUME 449318.700 3769244.594 296.86
LOCATION L0000957 VOLUME 449304.701 3769244.690 296.85
LOCATION L0000958 VOLUME 449290.701 3769244.786 296.84
LOCATION L0000959 VOLUME 449276.701 3769244.881 296.72
LOCATION L0000960 VOLUME 449262.702 3769244.977 296.59
LOCATION L0000961 VOLUME 449248.702 3769245.073 296.55
LOCATION L0000962 VOLUME 449234.702 3769245.169 296.55
LOCATION L0000963 VOLUME 449220.703 3769245.264 296.55
LOCATION L0000964 VOLUME 449206.703 3769245.360 296.55
LOCATION L0000965 VOLUME 449192.703 3769245.456 296.55
LOCATION L0000966 VOLUME 449178.704 3769245.551 296.55
LOCATION L0000967 VOLUME 449164.704 3769245.647 296.56
LOCATION L0000968 VOLUME 449150.704 3769245.743 296.56
LOCATION L0000969 VOLUME 449136.705 3769245.838 296.53
LOCATION L0000970 VOLUME 449122.705 3769245.934 296.39
LOCATION L0000971 VOLUME 449108.705 3769246.030 296.26
LOCATION L0000972 VOLUME 449094.706 3769246.126 296.26
LOCATION L0000973 VOLUME 449080.706 3769246.221 296.26
LOCATION L0000974 VOLUME 449066.706 3769246.317 296.27
LOCATION L0000975 VOLUME 449052.707 3769246.413 296.27
LOCATION L0000976 VOLUME 449038.707 3769246.508 296.27
LOCATION L0000977 VOLUME 449024.707 3769246.604 296.27
LOCATION L0000978 VOLUME 449010.708 3769246.700 296.18
LOCATION L0000979 VOLUME 448996.708 3769246.795 296.04
LOCATION L0000980 VOLUME 448982.708 3769246.891 295.97
LOCATION L0000981 VOLUME 448968.709 3769246.987 295.97
LOCATION L0000982 VOLUME 448954.709 3769247.083 295.97
LOCATION L0000983 VOLUME 448940.709 3769247.178 295.97
LOCATION L0000984 VOLUME 448926.709 3769247.274 295.94
LOCATION L0000985 VOLUME 448912.710 3769247.370 295.80
LOCATION L0000986 VOLUME 448898.710 3769247.465 295.66
LOCATION L0000987 VOLUME 448884.710 3769247.561 295.52
LOCATION L0000988 VOLUME 448870.711 3769247.657 295.38
LOCATION L0000989 VOLUME 448856.711 3769247.752 295.37
LOCATION L0000990 VOLUME 448842.711 3769247.848 295.37
LOCATION L0000991 VOLUME 448828.712 3769247.944 295.26
LOCATION L0000992 VOLUME 448814.712 3769248.040 295.12
LOCATION L0000993 VOLUME 448800.712 3769248.140 295.06
LOCATION L0000994 VOLUME 448786.713 3769248.282 295.07
LOCATION L0000995 VOLUME 448772.714 3769248.424 295.00
LOCATION L0000996 VOLUME 448758.715 3769248.565 294.86
LOCATION L0000997 VOLUME 448744.715 3769248.707 294.77
LOCATION L0000998 VOLUME 448730.716 3769248.849 294.77
LOCATION L0000999 VOLUME 448716.717 3769248.991 294.74
LOCATION L0001000 VOLUME 448702.718 3769249.132 294.62
LOCATION L0001001 VOLUME 448688.718 3769249.274 294.50
LOCATION L0001002 VOLUME 448674.719 3769249.416 294.50
LOCATION L0001003 VOLUME 448660.720 3769249.558 294.50
LOCATION L0001004 VOLUME 448646.720 3769249.700 294.49
LOCATION L0001005 VOLUME 448632.721 3769249.841 294.48
LOCATION L0001006 VOLUME 448618.722 3769249.983 294.38
LOCATION L0001007 VOLUME 448604.723 3769250.125 294.26 4131 LOCATION L0001008 VOLUME 448590.724 3769250.317 294.20
LOCATION L0001009 VOLUME 448576.725 3769250.522 294.18
LOCATION L0001010 VOLUME 448562.727 3769250.727 294.12
LOCATION L0001011 VOLUME 448548.728 3769250.933 294.00
LOCATION L0001012 VOLUME 448534.730 3769251.138 293.92
LOCATION L0001013 VOLUME 448520.731 3769251.343 293.93
LOCATION L0001014 VOLUME 448506.733 3769251.548 293.93
LOCATION L0001015 VOLUME 448492.734 3769251.753 293.94
LOCATION L0001016 VOLUME 448490.434 3769263.397 294.17
LOCATION L0001017 VOLUME 448490.542 3769277.397 294.45
LOCATION L0001018 VOLUME 448490.650 3769291.397 294.65
LOCATION L0001019 VOLUME 448490.758 3769305.396 294.84
LOCATION L0001020 VOLUME 448490.866 3769319.396 295.07
LOCATION L0001021 VOLUME 448490.974 3769333.395 295.30
LOCATION L0001022 VOLUME 448491.083 3769347.395 295.46
LOCATION L0001023 VOLUME 448491.191 3769361.394 295.61
LOCATION L0001024 VOLUME 448491.299 3769375.394 295.71
LOCATION L0001025 VOLUME 448491.407 3769389.394 295.80
LOCATION L0001026 VOLUME 448491.515 3769403.393 295.80
LOCATION L0001027 VOLUME 448491.623 3769417.393 295.71
LOCATION L0001028 VOLUME 448491.731 3769431.392 295.71
LOCATION L0001029 VOLUME 448491.839 3769445.392 295.85
LOCATION L0001030 VOLUME 448491.947 3769459.392 296.01
LOCATION L0001031 VOLUME 448492.056 3769473.391 296.23
LOCATION L0001032 VOLUME 448492.164 3769487.391 296.48
LOCATION L0001033 VOLUME 448492.272 3769501.390 297.05
LOCATION L0001034 VOLUME 448492.380 3769515.390 297.62
LOCATION L0001035 VOLUME 448492.488 3769529.389 297.98
LOCATION L0001036 VOLUME 448492.596 3769543.389 298.33
LOCATION L0001037 VOLUME 448492.704 3769557.389 298.46
LOCATION L0001038 VOLUME 448492.812 3769571.388 298.54
LOCATION L0001039 VOLUME 448492.920 3769585.388 298.57
LOCATION L0001040 VOLUME 448493.028 3769599.387 298.57
LOCATION L0001041 VOLUME 448493.137 3769613.387 298.60
LOCATION L0001042 VOLUME 448493.245 3769627.387 298.68
LOCATION L0001043 VOLUME 448493.353 3769641.386 298.92
LOCATION L0001044 VOLUME 448493.461 3769655.386 299.45
LOCATION L0001045 VOLUME 448493.569 3769669.385 300.05
LOCATION L0001046 VOLUME 448493.677 3769683.385 300.97
LOCATION L0001047 VOLUME 448493.785 3769697.384 301.90
LOCATION L0001048 VOLUME 448493.893 3769711.384 302.94
LOCATION L0001049 VOLUME 448494.001 3769725.384 303.98
LOCATION L0001050 VOLUME 448494.110 3769739.383 303.91
LOCATION L0001051 VOLUME 448494.218 3769753.383 303.77
LOCATION L0001052 VOLUME 448494.326 3769767.382 303.01
LOCATION L0001053 VOLUME 448494.434 3769781.382 302.08
LOCATION L0001054 VOLUME 448494.542 3769795.382 301.66
LOCATION L0001055 VOLUME 448494.650 3769809.381 301.51
LOCATION L0001056 VOLUME 448494.758 3769823.381 301.51
LOCATION L0001057 VOLUME 448494.866 3769837.380 301.65
LOCATION L0001058 VOLUME 448494.974 3769851.380 301.77
LOCATION L0001059 VOLUME 448495.082 3769865.379 301.84
LOCATION L0001060 VOLUME 448495.191 3769879.379 301.90
LOCATION L0001061 VOLUME 448495.299 3769893.379 301.90
LOCATION L0001062 VOLUME 448495.407 3769907.378 301.91
LOCATION L0001063 VOLUME 448495.515 3769921.378 302.05
LOCATION L0001064 VOLUME 448495.623 3769935.377 302.19
** End of LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE4
** Source Parameters **
** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE1
SRCPARAM L0000338 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000339 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000340 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000341 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000342 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000343 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25 4132
SRCPARAM L0000344 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000345 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000346 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000347 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000348 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000349 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000350 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000351 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000352 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000353 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000354 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000355 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000356 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000357 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000358 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000359 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000360 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000361 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000362 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000363 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000364 0.000001673 3.49 4.00 3.25
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE2
SRCPARAM L0000365 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000366 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000367 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000368 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000369 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000370 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000371 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000372 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000373 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000374 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000375 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000376 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000377 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000378 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000379 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000380 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000381 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000382 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000383 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000384 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000385 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000386 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000387 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000388 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000389 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000390 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000391 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000392 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000393 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000394 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000395 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000396 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000397 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000398 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000399 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000400 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000401 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000402 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000403 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000404 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000405 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000406 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000407 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25 4133
SRCPARAM L0000408 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000409 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000410 0.0000003222 3.49 4.00 3.25
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE3
SRCPARAM L0000738 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000739 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000740 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000741 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000742 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000743 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000744 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000745 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000746 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000747 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000748 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000749 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000750 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000751 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000752 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000753 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000754 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000755 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000756 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000757 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000758 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000759 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000760 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000761 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000762 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000763 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000764 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000765 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000766 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000767 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000768 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000769 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000770 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000771 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000772 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000773 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000774 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000775 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000776 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000777 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000778 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000779 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000780 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000781 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000782 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000783 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000784 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000785 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000786 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000787 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000788 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000789 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000790 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000791 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000792 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000793 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000794 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000795 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000796 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000797 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000798 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25 4134
SRCPARAM L0000799 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000800 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000801 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000802 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000803 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000804 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000805 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000806 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000807 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000808 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000809 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000810 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000811 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000812 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000813 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000814 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000815 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000816 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000817 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000818 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000819 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000820 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000821 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000822 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000823 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000824 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000825 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000826 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000827 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000828 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000829 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000830 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000831 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000832 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000833 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000834 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000835 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000836 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000837 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000838 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000839 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000840 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000841 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000842 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000843 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000844 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000845 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000846 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000847 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000848 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000849 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000850 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000851 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000852 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000853 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000854 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000855 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000856 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000857 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000858 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000859 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000860 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000861 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000862 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000863 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000864 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25 4135
SRCPARAM L0000865 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000866 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000867 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000868 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000869 0.0000000922 3.49 6.51 3.25
** --------------------------------------------------------------------- ** LINE VOLUME Source ID = SLINE4
SRCPARAM L0000870 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000871 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000872 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000873 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000874 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000875 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000876 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000877 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000878 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000879 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000880 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000881 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000882 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000883 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000884 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000885 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000886 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000887 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000888 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000889 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000890 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000891 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000892 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000893 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000894 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000895 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000896 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000897 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000898 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000899 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000900 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000901 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000902 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000903 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000904 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000905 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000906 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000907 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000908 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000909 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000910 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000911 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000912 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000913 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000914 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000915 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000916 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000917 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000918 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000919 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000920 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000921 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000922 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000923 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000924 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000925 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000926 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000927 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000928 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25 4136
SRCPARAM L0000929 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000930 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000931 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000932 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000933 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000934 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000935 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000936 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000937 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000938 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000939 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000940 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000941 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000942 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000943 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000944 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000945 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000946 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000947 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000948 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000949 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000950 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000951 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000952 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000953 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000954 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000955 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000956 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000957 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000958 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000959 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000960 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000961 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000962 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000963 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000964 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000965 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000966 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000967 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000968 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000969 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000970 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000971 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000972 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000973 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000974 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000975 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000976 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000977 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000978 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000979 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000980 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000981 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000982 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000983 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000984 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000985 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000986 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000987 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000988 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000989 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000990 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000991 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000992 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000993 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000994 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25 4137
SRCPARAM L0000995 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000996 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000997 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000998 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0000999 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001000 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001001 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001002 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001003 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001004 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001005 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001006 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001007 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001008 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001009 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001010 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001011 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001012 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001013 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001014 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001015 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001016 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001017 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001018 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001019 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001020 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001021 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001022 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001023 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001024 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001025 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001026 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001027 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001028 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001029 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001030 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001031 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001032 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001033 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001034 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001035 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001036 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001037 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001038 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001039 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001040 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001041 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001042 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001043 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001044 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001045 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001046 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001047 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001048 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001049 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001050 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001051 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001052 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001053 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001054 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001055 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001056 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001057 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001058 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001059 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001060 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25 4138
SRCPARAM L0001061 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001062 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001063 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
SRCPARAM L0001064 0.00000009231 3.49 6.51 3.25
** ---------------------------------------------------------------------
URBANSRC ALL
SRCGROUP ALL
SO FINISHED
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Receptor Pathway
****************************************
**
**
RE STARTING
INCLUDED "14539 Ops.rou"
RE FINISHED
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Meteorology Pathway
****************************************
**
**
ME STARTING
SURFFILE KONT_V9_ADJU\KONT_v9.SFC
PROFFILE KONT_V9_ADJU\KONT_v9.PFL
SURFDATA 3102 2012
UAIRDATA 3190 2012
PROFBASE 289.0 METERS
ME FINISHED
**
****************************************
** AERMOD Output Pathway
****************************************
**
**
OU STARTING
** Auto-Generated Plotfiles
PLOTFILE ANNUAL ALL "14539 Ops.AD\AN00GALL.PLT" 31
SUMMFILE "14539 Ops.sum"
OU FINISHED
*** Message Summary For AERMOD Model Setup ***
--------- Summary of Total Messages --------
A Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s)
A Total of 2 Warning Message(s)
A Total of 0 Informational Message(s)
******** FATAL ERROR MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
ME W186 953 MEOPEN: THRESH_1MIN 1-min ASOS wind speed threshold used 0.50 ME W187 953 MEOPEN: ADJ_U* Option for Stable Low Winds used in AERMET ***********************************
*** SETUP Finishes Successfully ***
***********************************
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24 4139
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 1
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** MODEL SETUP OPTIONS SUMMARY ***
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
** Model Options Selected:
* Model Uses Regulatory DEFAULT Options
* Model Is Setup For Calculation of Average CONCentration Values. * NO GAS DEPOSITION Data Provided.
* NO PARTICLE DEPOSITION Data Provided.
* Model Uses NO DRY DEPLETION. DDPLETE = F
* Model Uses NO WET DEPLETION. WETDPLT = F
* Stack-tip Downwash.
* Model Accounts for ELEVated Terrain Effects.
* Use Calms Processing Routine.
* Use Missing Data Processing Routine.
* No Exponential Decay.
* Model Uses URBAN Dispersion Algorithm for the SBL for 400 Source(s), for Total of 1 Urban Area(s):
Urban Population = 2035210.0 ; Urban Roughness Length = 1.000 m * Urban Roughness Length of 1.0 Meter Used.
* ADJ_U* - Use ADJ_U* option for SBL in AERMET
* CCVR_Sub - Meteorological data includes CCVR substitutions * TEMP_Sub - Meteorological data includes TEMP substitutions * Model Assumes No FLAGPOLE Receptor Heights.
* The User Specified a Pollutant Type of: DPM
**Model Calculates ANNUAL Averages Only
**This Run Includes: 400 Source(s); 1 Source Group(s); and 65 Receptor(s) with: 0 POINT(s), including
0 POINTCAP(s) and 0 POINTHOR(s)
and: 400 VOLUME source(s)
and: 0 AREA type source(s)
and: 0 LINE source(s)
and: 0 RLINE/RLINEXT source(s)
and: 0 OPENPIT source(s)
and: 0 BUOYANT LINE source(s) with a total of 0 line(s) and: 0 SWPOINT source(s)
**Model Set To Continue RUNning After the Setup Testing. **The AERMET Input Meteorological Data Version Date: 16216 **Output Options Selected:
Model Outputs Tables of ANNUAL Averages by Receptor
Model Outputs External File(s) of High Values for Plotting (PLOTFILE Keyword) Model Outputs Separate Summary File of High Ranked Values (SUMMFILE Keyword) **NOTE: The Following Flags May Appear Following CONC Values: c for Calm Hours m for Missing Hours
b for Both Calm and Missing
Hours
**Misc. Inputs: Base Elev. for Pot. Temp. Profile (m MSL) = 289.00 ; Decay Coef. =
0.000 ; Rot. Angle = 0.0
Emission Units = GRAMS/SEC ; Emission Rate
Unit Factor = 0.10000E+07
Output Units = MICROGRAMS/M**3 4140
**Approximate Storage Requirements of Model = 3.7 MB of RAM. **Input Runstream File:
aermod.inp
**Output Print File:
aermod.out
**Detailed Error/Message File: 14539
Ops.err
**File for Summary of Results: 14539
Ops.sum
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 2
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000338 0 0.16730E-05 450588.6 3769293.5 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000339 0 0.16730E-05 450597.2 3769293.7 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000340 0 0.16730E-05 450605.7 3769294.0 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000341 0 0.16730E-05 450614.3 3769294.2 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000342 0 0.16730E-05 450622.9 3769294.5 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000343 0 0.16730E-05 450631.5 3769294.7 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000344 0 0.16730E-05 450640.1 3769295.0 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000345 0 0.16730E-05 450648.7 3769295.2 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000346 0 0.16730E-05 450657.3 3769295.5 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000347 0 0.16730E-05 450665.8 3769295.7 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000348 0 0.16730E-05 450674.4 3769296.0 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000349 0 0.16730E-05 450683.0 3769296.2 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000350 0 0.16730E-05 450691.6 3769296.5 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000351 0 0.16730E-05 450700.2 3769296.7 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000352 0 0.16730E-05 450708.8 3769297.0 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000353 0 0.16730E-05 450717.4 3769297.3 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000354 0 0.16730E-05 450726.0 3769297.5 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO 4141
L0000355 0 0.16730E-05 450734.5 3769297.8 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000356 0 0.16730E-05 450743.1 3769298.0 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000357 0 0.16730E-05 450751.7 3769298.3 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000358 0 0.16730E-05 450760.3 3769298.5 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000359 0 0.16730E-05 450768.9 3769298.8 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000360 0 0.16730E-05 450777.5 3769299.0 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000361 0 0.16730E-05 450786.1 3769299.3 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000362 0 0.16730E-05 450794.6 3769299.5 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000363 0 0.16730E-05 450803.2 3769299.8 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000364 0 0.16730E-05 450811.8 3769300.0 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000365 0 0.32220E-06 450532.1 3769248.3 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000366 0 0.32220E-06 450532.1 3769256.9 298.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000367 0 0.32220E-06 450536.0 3769261.6 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000368 0 0.32220E-06 450544.6 3769261.7 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000369 0 0.32220E-06 450553.2 3769261.7 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000370 0 0.32220E-06 450561.8 3769261.8 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000371 0 0.32220E-06 450570.4 3769261.8 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000372 0 0.32220E-06 450578.9 3769261.9 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000373 0 0.32220E-06 450585.7 3769266.4 298.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000374 0 0.32220E-06 450591.6 3769272.5 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000375 0 0.32220E-06 450599.3 3769274.8 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000376 0 0.32220E-06 450607.9 3769275.0 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000377 0 0.32220E-06 450616.5 3769275.1 298.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 3
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
4142
L0000378 0 0.32220E-06 450625.1 3769275.3 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000379 0 0.32220E-06 450633.7 3769275.5 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000380 0 0.32220E-06 450642.3 3769275.6 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000381 0 0.32220E-06 450650.8 3769275.8 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000382 0 0.32220E-06 450659.4 3769276.0 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000383 0 0.32220E-06 450668.0 3769276.2 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000384 0 0.32220E-06 450676.6 3769276.3 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000385 0 0.32220E-06 450685.2 3769276.5 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000386 0 0.32220E-06 450693.8 3769276.7 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000387 0 0.32220E-06 450702.4 3769276.8 298.7 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000388 0 0.32220E-06 450711.0 3769277.0 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000389 0 0.32220E-06 450719.5 3769277.2 298.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000390 0 0.32220E-06 450728.1 3769277.3 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000391 0 0.32220E-06 450736.7 3769277.5 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000392 0 0.32220E-06 450745.3 3769277.7 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000393 0 0.32220E-06 450753.9 3769277.8 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000394 0 0.32220E-06 450762.5 3769278.0 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000395 0 0.32220E-06 450771.1 3769278.2 298.3 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000396 0 0.32220E-06 450779.7 3769278.3 298.2 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000397 0 0.32220E-06 450788.2 3769277.7 298.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000398 0 0.32220E-06 450796.8 3769276.8 298.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000399 0 0.32220E-06 450805.3 3769275.9 298.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000400 0 0.32220E-06 450813.9 3769275.0 298.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000401 0 0.32220E-06 450822.4 3769274.3 298.1 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000402 0 0.32220E-06 450831.0 3769274.3 298.2 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000403 0 0.32220E-06 450839.6 3769274.2 298.3 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000404 0 0.32220E-06 450848.2 3769274.2 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000405 0 0.32220E-06 450856.8 3769274.1 298.4 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000406 0 0.32220E-06 450865.4 3769274.0 298.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000407 0 0.32220E-06 450873.9 3769274.0 298.6 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000408 0 0.32220E-06 450875.5 3769266.8 298.5 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000409 0 0.32220E-06 450875.8 3769258.2 298.3 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO
L0000410 0 0.32220E-06 450876.0 3769249.6 298.2 3.49 4.00 3.25 YES NO 4143
L0000738 0 0.92200E-07 450538.5 3769231.7 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000739 0 0.92200E-07 450552.5 3769231.6 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000740 0 0.92200E-07 450566.5 3769231.5 298.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000741 0 0.92200E-07 450580.5 3769231.4 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000742 0 0.92200E-07 450594.5 3769231.3 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000743 0 0.92200E-07 450608.5 3769231.2 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000744 0 0.92200E-07 450622.5 3769231.1 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 4
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000745 0 0.92200E-07 450636.5 3769231.0 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000746 0 0.92200E-07 450650.5 3769230.8 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000747 0 0.92200E-07 450664.5 3769230.7 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000748 0 0.92200E-07 450678.5 3769230.6 298.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000749 0 0.92200E-07 450692.5 3769230.5 298.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000750 0 0.92200E-07 450706.5 3769230.4 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000751 0 0.92200E-07 450720.5 3769230.3 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000752 0 0.92200E-07 450734.5 3769230.2 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000753 0 0.92200E-07 450748.5 3769230.1 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000754 0 0.92200E-07 450762.5 3769230.0 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000755 0 0.92200E-07 450776.5 3769229.8 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000756 0 0.92200E-07 450790.5 3769229.7 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000757 0 0.92200E-07 450804.5 3769229.6 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000758 0 0.92200E-07 450818.5 3769229.5 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000759 0 0.92200E-07 450832.5 3769229.4 298.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000760 0 0.92200E-07 450846.5 3769229.3 298.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4144
L0000761 0 0.92200E-07 450860.5 3769229.2 298.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000762 0 0.92200E-07 450874.5 3769229.1 297.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000763 0 0.92200E-07 450888.5 3769229.0 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000764 0 0.92200E-07 450902.5 3769228.9 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000765 0 0.92200E-07 450916.5 3769228.7 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000766 0 0.92200E-07 450930.5 3769228.6 297.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000767 0 0.92200E-07 450944.5 3769228.5 297.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000768 0 0.92200E-07 450958.5 3769228.4 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000769 0 0.92200E-07 450972.5 3769228.3 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000770 0 0.92200E-07 450986.5 3769228.2 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000771 0 0.92200E-07 451000.5 3769228.1 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000772 0 0.92200E-07 451014.5 3769228.0 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000773 0 0.92200E-07 451028.5 3769227.9 297.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000774 0 0.92200E-07 451042.5 3769227.8 296.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000775 0 0.92200E-07 451056.5 3769227.6 296.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000776 0 0.92200E-07 451070.5 3769227.5 296.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000777 0 0.92200E-07 451084.5 3769227.4 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000778 0 0.92200E-07 451098.5 3769227.3 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000779 0 0.92200E-07 451112.5 3769227.2 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000780 0 0.92200E-07 451126.5 3769227.1 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000781 0 0.92200E-07 451140.5 3769227.0 296.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000782 0 0.92200E-07 451154.5 3769226.9 296.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000783 0 0.92200E-07 451168.5 3769226.8 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000784 0 0.92200E-07 451182.5 3769226.6 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 5
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4145 - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000785 0 0.92200E-07 451196.5 3769226.5 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000786 0 0.92200E-07 451210.5 3769226.4 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000787 0 0.92200E-07 451224.5 3769226.3 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000788 0 0.92200E-07 451238.5 3769226.2 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000789 0 0.92200E-07 451252.5 3769226.1 296.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000790 0 0.92200E-07 451266.5 3769226.0 296.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000791 0 0.92200E-07 451280.5 3769225.9 295.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000792 0 0.92200E-07 451294.5 3769225.8 295.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000793 0 0.92200E-07 451308.5 3769225.7 295.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000794 0 0.92200E-07 451322.5 3769225.5 295.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000795 0 0.92200E-07 451336.5 3769225.4 295.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000796 0 0.92200E-07 451350.5 3769225.3 295.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000797 0 0.92200E-07 451364.5 3769225.2 295.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000798 0 0.92200E-07 451378.5 3769225.1 296.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000799 0 0.92200E-07 451392.5 3769225.0 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000800 0 0.92200E-07 451406.5 3769224.9 296.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000801 0 0.92200E-07 451420.5 3769224.8 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000802 0 0.92200E-07 451434.5 3769224.7 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000803 0 0.92200E-07 451448.5 3769224.6 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000804 0 0.92200E-07 451462.4 3769224.2 297.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000805 0 0.92200E-07 451476.4 3769223.1 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000806 0 0.92200E-07 451489.6 3769218.6 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000807 0 0.92200E-07 451502.7 3769213.6 297.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000808 0 0.92200E-07 451515.7 3769208.5 297.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000809 0 0.92200E-07 451528.8 3769203.5 297.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000810 0 0.92200E-07 451541.8 3769198.4 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000811 0 0.92200E-07 451554.9 3769193.3 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000812 0 0.92200E-07 451567.9 3769188.3 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000813 0 0.92200E-07 451581.1 3769183.4 297.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000814 0 0.92200E-07 451594.6 3769180.0 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000815 0 0.92200E-07 451608.4 3769178.0 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000816 0 0.92200E-07 451622.4 3769177.1 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4146
L0000817 0 0.92200E-07 451631.0 3769182.8 297.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000818 0 0.92200E-07 451632.8 3769196.6 298.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000819 0 0.92200E-07 451633.8 3769210.6 298.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000820 0 0.92200E-07 451633.7 3769224.6 298.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000821 0 0.92200E-07 451633.6 3769238.6 299.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000822 0 0.92200E-07 451633.5 3769252.6 299.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000823 0 0.92200E-07 451633.5 3769266.6 300.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000824 0 0.92200E-07 451633.4 3769280.6 301.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 6
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000825 0 0.92200E-07 451633.3 3769294.6 301.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000826 0 0.92200E-07 451633.2 3769308.6 302.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000827 0 0.92200E-07 451633.1 3769322.6 303.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000828 0 0.92200E-07 451633.0 3769336.6 304.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000829 0 0.92200E-07 451632.9 3769350.6 305.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000830 0 0.92200E-07 451632.8 3769364.6 307.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000831 0 0.92200E-07 451632.8 3769378.6 307.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000832 0 0.92200E-07 451633.0 3769392.6 307.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000833 0 0.92200E-07 451633.2 3769406.6 306.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000834 0 0.92200E-07 451633.5 3769420.6 305.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000835 0 0.92200E-07 451633.7 3769434.6 305.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000836 0 0.92200E-07 451633.9 3769448.6 304.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000837 0 0.92200E-07 451634.2 3769462.6 305.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000838 0 0.92200E-07 451634.4 3769476.6 305.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000839 0 0.92200E-07 451634.7 3769490.6 305.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4147
L0000840 0 0.92200E-07 451635.0 3769504.5 306.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000841 0 0.92200E-07 451635.4 3769518.5 306.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000842 0 0.92200E-07 451635.8 3769532.5 306.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000843 0 0.92200E-07 451636.2 3769546.5 306.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000844 0 0.92200E-07 451636.5 3769560.5 306.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000845 0 0.92200E-07 451636.9 3769574.5 306.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000846 0 0.92200E-07 451637.3 3769588.5 307.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000847 0 0.92200E-07 451637.6 3769602.5 307.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000848 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769616.5 307.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000849 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769630.5 307.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000850 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769644.5 307.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000851 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769658.5 306.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000852 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769672.5 305.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000853 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769686.5 305.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000854 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769700.5 304.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000855 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769714.5 304.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000856 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769728.5 304.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000857 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769742.5 304.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000858 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769756.5 304.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000859 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769770.5 305.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000860 0 0.92200E-07 451637.9 3769784.5 305.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000861 0 0.92200E-07 451638.3 3769798.5 306.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000862 0 0.92200E-07 451638.8 3769812.5 307.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000863 0 0.92200E-07 451639.3 3769826.5 307.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000864 0 0.92200E-07 451639.7 3769840.5 307.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 7
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) 4148 (METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000865 0 0.92200E-07 451640.2 3769854.5 307.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000866 0 0.92200E-07 451640.7 3769868.5 308.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000867 0 0.92200E-07 451641.1 3769882.5 308.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000868 0 0.92200E-07 451641.6 3769896.4 308.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000869 0 0.92200E-07 451642.1 3769910.4 307.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000870 0 0.92310E-07 450522.6 3769233.5 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000871 0 0.92310E-07 450508.6 3769233.7 298.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000872 0 0.92310E-07 450494.6 3769233.9 298.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000873 0 0.92310E-07 450480.6 3769234.0 298.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000874 0 0.92310E-07 450466.6 3769234.2 298.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000875 0 0.92310E-07 450452.6 3769234.4 298.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000876 0 0.92310E-07 450438.6 3769234.5 298.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000877 0 0.92310E-07 450424.6 3769234.7 298.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000878 0 0.92310E-07 450410.6 3769234.9 298.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000879 0 0.92310E-07 450396.6 3769235.1 298.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000880 0 0.92310E-07 450382.6 3769235.2 298.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000881 0 0.92310E-07 450368.6 3769235.4 298.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000882 0 0.92310E-07 450354.6 3769235.6 298.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000883 0 0.92310E-07 450340.6 3769235.8 298.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000884 0 0.92310E-07 450326.6 3769235.9 298.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000885 0 0.92310E-07 450312.6 3769236.1 298.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000886 0 0.92310E-07 450298.6 3769236.3 298.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000887 0 0.92310E-07 450284.6 3769236.5 298.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000888 0 0.92310E-07 450270.6 3769236.6 298.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000889 0 0.92310E-07 450256.6 3769236.8 298.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000890 0 0.92310E-07 450242.6 3769237.0 298.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000891 0 0.92310E-07 450228.6 3769237.2 298.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000892 0 0.92310E-07 450214.7 3769237.3 298.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000893 0 0.92310E-07 450200.7 3769237.5 298.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000894 0 0.92310E-07 450186.7 3769237.7 298.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000895 0 0.92310E-07 450172.7 3769237.8 298.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4149
L0000896 0 0.92310E-07 450158.7 3769238.0 297.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000897 0 0.92310E-07 450144.7 3769238.2 297.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000898 0 0.92310E-07 450130.7 3769238.4 297.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000899 0 0.92310E-07 450116.7 3769238.5 297.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000900 0 0.92310E-07 450102.7 3769238.7 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000901 0 0.92310E-07 450088.7 3769238.9 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000902 0 0.92310E-07 450074.7 3769239.1 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000903 0 0.92310E-07 450060.7 3769239.2 297.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000904 0 0.92310E-07 450046.7 3769239.4 297.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 8
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000905 0 0.92310E-07 450032.7 3769239.6 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000906 0 0.92310E-07 450018.7 3769239.8 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000907 0 0.92310E-07 450004.7 3769239.9 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000908 0 0.92310E-07 449990.7 3769240.1 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000909 0 0.92310E-07 449976.7 3769240.3 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000910 0 0.92310E-07 449962.7 3769240.4 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000911 0 0.92310E-07 449948.7 3769240.6 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000912 0 0.92310E-07 449934.7 3769240.8 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000913 0 0.92310E-07 449920.7 3769241.0 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000914 0 0.92310E-07 449906.7 3769241.0 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000915 0 0.92310E-07 449892.7 3769241.0 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000916 0 0.92310E-07 449878.7 3769241.0 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000917 0 0.92310E-07 449864.7 3769240.9 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000918 0 0.92310E-07 449850.7 3769240.9 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4150
L0000919 0 0.92310E-07 449836.7 3769240.9 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000920 0 0.92310E-07 449822.7 3769240.9 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000921 0 0.92310E-07 449808.7 3769240.8 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000922 0 0.92310E-07 449794.7 3769240.8 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000923 0 0.92310E-07 449780.7 3769240.8 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000924 0 0.92310E-07 449766.7 3769240.7 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000925 0 0.92310E-07 449752.7 3769240.7 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000926 0 0.92310E-07 449738.7 3769240.7 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000927 0 0.92310E-07 449724.7 3769240.7 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000928 0 0.92310E-07 449710.7 3769240.6 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000929 0 0.92310E-07 449696.7 3769240.6 297.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000930 0 0.92310E-07 449682.7 3769240.6 297.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000931 0 0.92310E-07 449668.7 3769240.6 297.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000932 0 0.92310E-07 449654.7 3769240.5 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000933 0 0.92310E-07 449640.7 3769240.6 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000934 0 0.92310E-07 449626.7 3769240.7 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000935 0 0.92310E-07 449612.7 3769240.9 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000936 0 0.92310E-07 449598.7 3769241.1 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000937 0 0.92310E-07 449584.7 3769241.3 297.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000938 0 0.92310E-07 449570.7 3769241.4 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000939 0 0.92310E-07 449556.7 3769241.6 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000940 0 0.92310E-07 449542.7 3769241.8 297.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000941 0 0.92310E-07 449528.7 3769242.0 297.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000942 0 0.92310E-07 449514.7 3769242.1 297.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000943 0 0.92310E-07 449500.7 3769242.3 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000944 0 0.92310E-07 449486.7 3769242.5 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 9
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ 4151
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000945 0 0.92310E-07 449472.7 3769242.7 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000946 0 0.92310E-07 449458.7 3769242.8 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000947 0 0.92310E-07 449444.7 3769243.0 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000948 0 0.92310E-07 449430.7 3769243.2 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000949 0 0.92310E-07 449416.7 3769243.4 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000950 0 0.92310E-07 449402.7 3769243.6 297.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000951 0 0.92310E-07 449388.7 3769243.7 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000952 0 0.92310E-07 449374.7 3769243.9 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000953 0 0.92310E-07 449360.7 3769244.1 297.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000954 0 0.92310E-07 449346.7 3769244.3 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000955 0 0.92310E-07 449332.7 3769244.4 297.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000956 0 0.92310E-07 449318.7 3769244.6 296.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000957 0 0.92310E-07 449304.7 3769244.7 296.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000958 0 0.92310E-07 449290.7 3769244.8 296.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000959 0 0.92310E-07 449276.7 3769244.9 296.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000960 0 0.92310E-07 449262.7 3769245.0 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000961 0 0.92310E-07 449248.7 3769245.1 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000962 0 0.92310E-07 449234.7 3769245.2 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000963 0 0.92310E-07 449220.7 3769245.3 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000964 0 0.92310E-07 449206.7 3769245.4 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000965 0 0.92310E-07 449192.7 3769245.5 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000966 0 0.92310E-07 449178.7 3769245.6 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000967 0 0.92310E-07 449164.7 3769245.6 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000968 0 0.92310E-07 449150.7 3769245.7 296.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000969 0 0.92310E-07 449136.7 3769245.8 296.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000970 0 0.92310E-07 449122.7 3769245.9 296.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000971 0 0.92310E-07 449108.7 3769246.0 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000972 0 0.92310E-07 449094.7 3769246.1 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000973 0 0.92310E-07 449080.7 3769246.2 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000974 0 0.92310E-07 449066.7 3769246.3 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4152
L0000975 0 0.92310E-07 449052.7 3769246.4 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000976 0 0.92310E-07 449038.7 3769246.5 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000977 0 0.92310E-07 449024.7 3769246.6 296.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000978 0 0.92310E-07 449010.7 3769246.7 296.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000979 0 0.92310E-07 448996.7 3769246.8 296.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000980 0 0.92310E-07 448982.7 3769246.9 296.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000981 0 0.92310E-07 448968.7 3769247.0 296.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000982 0 0.92310E-07 448954.7 3769247.1 296.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000983 0 0.92310E-07 448940.7 3769247.2 296.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000984 0 0.92310E-07 448926.7 3769247.3 295.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 10
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT.
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0000985 0 0.92310E-07 448912.7 3769247.4 295.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000986 0 0.92310E-07 448898.7 3769247.5 295.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000987 0 0.92310E-07 448884.7 3769247.6 295.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000988 0 0.92310E-07 448870.7 3769247.7 295.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000989 0 0.92310E-07 448856.7 3769247.8 295.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000990 0 0.92310E-07 448842.7 3769247.8 295.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000991 0 0.92310E-07 448828.7 3769247.9 295.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000992 0 0.92310E-07 448814.7 3769248.0 295.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000993 0 0.92310E-07 448800.7 3769248.1 295.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000994 0 0.92310E-07 448786.7 3769248.3 295.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000995 0 0.92310E-07 448772.7 3769248.4 295.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000996 0 0.92310E-07 448758.7 3769248.6 294.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000997 0 0.92310E-07 448744.7 3769248.7 294.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4153
L0000998 0 0.92310E-07 448730.7 3769248.8 294.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0000999 0 0.92310E-07 448716.7 3769249.0 294.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001000 0 0.92310E-07 448702.7 3769249.1 294.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001001 0 0.92310E-07 448688.7 3769249.3 294.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001002 0 0.92310E-07 448674.7 3769249.4 294.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001003 0 0.92310E-07 448660.7 3769249.6 294.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001004 0 0.92310E-07 448646.7 3769249.7 294.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001005 0 0.92310E-07 448632.7 3769249.8 294.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001006 0 0.92310E-07 448618.7 3769250.0 294.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001007 0 0.92310E-07 448604.7 3769250.1 294.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001008 0 0.92310E-07 448590.7 3769250.3 294.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001009 0 0.92310E-07 448576.7 3769250.5 294.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001010 0 0.92310E-07 448562.7 3769250.7 294.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001011 0 0.92310E-07 448548.7 3769250.9 294.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001012 0 0.92310E-07 448534.7 3769251.1 293.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001013 0 0.92310E-07 448520.7 3769251.3 293.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001014 0 0.92310E-07 448506.7 3769251.5 293.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001015 0 0.92310E-07 448492.7 3769251.8 293.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001016 0 0.92310E-07 448490.4 3769263.4 294.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001017 0 0.92310E-07 448490.5 3769277.4 294.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001018 0 0.92310E-07 448490.6 3769291.4 294.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001019 0 0.92310E-07 448490.8 3769305.4 294.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001020 0 0.92310E-07 448490.9 3769319.4 295.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001021 0 0.92310E-07 448491.0 3769333.4 295.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001022 0 0.92310E-07 448491.1 3769347.4 295.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001023 0 0.92310E-07 448491.2 3769361.4 295.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001024 0 0.92310E-07 448491.3 3769375.4 295.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 11
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** VOLUME SOURCE DATA ***
NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. 4154
URBAN EMISSION RATE AIRCRAFT
SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ
SOURCE SCALAR VARY
ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS)
(METERS) BY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
L0001025 0 0.92310E-07 448491.4 3769389.4 295.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001026 0 0.92310E-07 448491.5 3769403.4 295.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001027 0 0.92310E-07 448491.6 3769417.4 295.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001028 0 0.92310E-07 448491.7 3769431.4 295.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001029 0 0.92310E-07 448491.8 3769445.4 295.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001030 0 0.92310E-07 448491.9 3769459.4 296.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001031 0 0.92310E-07 448492.1 3769473.4 296.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001032 0 0.92310E-07 448492.2 3769487.4 296.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001033 0 0.92310E-07 448492.3 3769501.4 297.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001034 0 0.92310E-07 448492.4 3769515.4 297.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001035 0 0.92310E-07 448492.5 3769529.4 298.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001036 0 0.92310E-07 448492.6 3769543.4 298.3 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001037 0 0.92310E-07 448492.7 3769557.4 298.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001038 0 0.92310E-07 448492.8 3769571.4 298.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001039 0 0.92310E-07 448492.9 3769585.4 298.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001040 0 0.92310E-07 448493.0 3769599.4 298.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001041 0 0.92310E-07 448493.1 3769613.4 298.6 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001042 0 0.92310E-07 448493.2 3769627.4 298.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001043 0 0.92310E-07 448493.4 3769641.4 298.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001044 0 0.92310E-07 448493.5 3769655.4 299.4 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001045 0 0.92310E-07 448493.6 3769669.4 300.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001046 0 0.92310E-07 448493.7 3769683.4 301.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001047 0 0.92310E-07 448493.8 3769697.4 301.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001048 0 0.92310E-07 448493.9 3769711.4 302.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001049 0 0.92310E-07 448494.0 3769725.4 304.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001050 0 0.92310E-07 448494.1 3769739.4 303.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001051 0 0.92310E-07 448494.2 3769753.4 303.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001052 0 0.92310E-07 448494.3 3769767.4 303.0 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001053 0 0.92310E-07 448494.4 3769781.4 302.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO 4155
L0001054 0 0.92310E-07 448494.5 3769795.4 301.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001055 0 0.92310E-07 448494.6 3769809.4 301.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001056 0 0.92310E-07 448494.8 3769823.4 301.5 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001057 0 0.92310E-07 448494.9 3769837.4 301.7 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001058 0 0.92310E-07 448495.0 3769851.4 301.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001059 0 0.92310E-07 448495.1 3769865.4 301.8 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001060 0 0.92310E-07 448495.2 3769879.4 301.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001061 0 0.92310E-07 448495.3 3769893.4 301.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001062 0 0.92310E-07 448495.4 3769907.4 301.9 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001063 0 0.92310E-07 448495.5 3769921.4 302.1 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
L0001064 0 0.92310E-07 448495.6 3769935.4 302.2 3.49 6.51 3.25 YES NO
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 12
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS ***
SRCGROUP ID SOURCE IDs
----------- ----------
ALL L0000338 , L0000339 , L0000340 , L0000341 , L0000342 , L0000343 , L0000344 , L0000345 ,
L0000346 , L0000347 , L0000348 , L0000349 , L0000350 , L0000351 , L0000352 , L0000353 ,
L0000354 , L0000355 , L0000356 , L0000357 , L0000358 , L0000359 , L0000360 , L0000361 ,
L0000362 , L0000363 , L0000364 , L0000365 , L0000366 , L0000367 , L0000368 , L0000369 ,
L0000370 , L0000371 , L0000372 , L0000373 , L0000374 , L0000375 , L0000376 , L0000377 ,
L0000378 , L0000379 , L0000380 , L0000381 , L0000382 , L0000383 , L0000384 , L0000385 ,
L0000386 , L0000387 , L0000388 , L0000389 , L0000390 , L0000391 , L0000392 , L0000393 ,
L0000394 , L0000395 , L0000396 , L0000397 , L0000398 , L0000399 , L0000400 , L0000401 ,
L0000402 , L0000403 , L0000404 , L0000405 , L0000406 , L0000407 , L0000408 , L0000409 ,
L0000410 , L0000738 , L0000739 , L0000740 , L0000741 , L0000742 , L0000743 , L0000744 , 4156
L0000745 , L0000746 , L0000747 , L0000748 , L0000749 , L0000750 , L0000751 , L0000752 ,
L0000753 , L0000754 , L0000755 , L0000756 , L0000757 , L0000758 , L0000759 , L0000760 ,
L0000761 , L0000762 , L0000763 , L0000764 , L0000765 , L0000766 , L0000767 , L0000768 ,
L0000769 , L0000770 , L0000771 , L0000772 , L0000773 , L0000774 , L0000775 , L0000776 ,
L0000777 , L0000778 , L0000779 , L0000780 , L0000781 , L0000782 , L0000783 , L0000784 ,
L0000785 , L0000786 , L0000787 , L0000788 , L0000789 , L0000790 , L0000791 , L0000792 ,
L0000793 , L0000794 , L0000795 , L0000796 , L0000797 , L0000798 , L0000799 , L0000800 ,
L0000801 , L0000802 , L0000803 , L0000804 , L0000805 , L0000806 , L0000807 , L0000808 ,
L0000809 , L0000810 , L0000811 , L0000812 , L0000813 , L0000814 , L0000815 , L0000816 ,
L0000817 , L0000818 , L0000819 , L0000820 , L0000821 , L0000822 , L0000823 , L0000824 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 13
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS ***
SRCGROUP ID SOURCE IDs
----------- ----------
L0000825 , L0000826 , L0000827 , L0000828 , L0000829 , L0000830 , L0000831 , L0000832 ,
L0000833 , L0000834 , L0000835 , L0000836 , L0000837 , L0000838 , L0000839 , L0000840 ,
L0000841 , L0000842 , L0000843 , L0000844 , L0000845 , L0000846 , L0000847 , L0000848 ,
L0000849 , L0000850 , L0000851 , L0000852 , L0000853 , L0000854 , L0000855 , L0000856 ,
L0000857 , L0000858 , L0000859 , L0000860 , L0000861 , L0000862 , L0000863 , L0000864 ,
L0000865 , L0000866 , L0000867 , L0000868 , L0000869 , L0000870 , L0000871 , L0000872 ,
L0000873 , L0000874 , L0000875 , L0000876 , L0000877 , L0000878 , L0000879 , L0000880 ,
4157
L0000881 , L0000882 , L0000883 , L0000884 , L0000885 , L0000886 , L0000887 , L0000888 ,
L0000889 , L0000890 , L0000891 , L0000892 , L0000893 , L0000894 , L0000895 , L0000896 ,
L0000897 , L0000898 , L0000899 , L0000900 , L0000901 , L0000902 , L0000903 , L0000904 ,
L0000905 , L0000906 , L0000907 , L0000908 , L0000909 , L0000910 , L0000911 , L0000912 ,
L0000913 , L0000914 , L0000915 , L0000916 , L0000917 , L0000918 , L0000919 , L0000920 ,
L0000921 , L0000922 , L0000923 , L0000924 , L0000925 , L0000926 , L0000927 , L0000928 ,
L0000929 , L0000930 , L0000931 , L0000932 , L0000933 , L0000934 , L0000935 , L0000936 ,
L0000937 , L0000938 , L0000939 , L0000940 , L0000941 , L0000942 , L0000943 , L0000944 ,
L0000945 , L0000946 , L0000947 , L0000948 , L0000949 , L0000950 , L0000951 , L0000952 ,
L0000953 , L0000954 , L0000955 , L0000956 , L0000957 , L0000958 , L0000959 , L0000960 ,
L0000961 , L0000962 , L0000963 , L0000964 , L0000965 , L0000966 , L0000967 , L0000968 ,
L0000969 , L0000970 , L0000971 , L0000972 , L0000973 , L0000974 , L0000975 , L0000976 ,
L0000977 , L0000978 , L0000979 , L0000980 , L0000981 , L0000982 , L0000983 , L0000984 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 14
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS ***
SRCGROUP ID SOURCE IDs
----------- ----------
L0000985 , L0000986 , L0000987 , L0000988 , L0000989 , L0000990 , L0000991 , L0000992 ,
L0000993 , L0000994 , L0000995 , L0000996 , L0000997 , L0000998 , L0000999 , L0001000 ,
L0001001 , L0001002 , L0001003 , L0001004 , L0001005 , L0001006 , L0001007 , L0001008 ,
L0001009 , L0001010 , L0001011 , L0001012 , L0001013 , L0001014 , L0001015 , L0001016 ,
L0001017 , L0001018 , L0001019 , L0001020 , L0001021 , L0001022 , 4158 L0001023 , L0001024 ,
L0001025 , L0001026 , L0001027 , L0001028 , L0001029 , L0001030 , L0001031 , L0001032 ,
L0001033 , L0001034 , L0001035 , L0001036 , L0001037 , L0001038 , L0001039 , L0001040 ,
L0001041 , L0001042 , L0001043 , L0001044 , L0001045 , L0001046 , L0001047 , L0001048 ,
L0001049 , L0001050 , L0001051 , L0001052 , L0001053 , L0001054 , L0001055 , L0001056 ,
L0001057 , L0001058 , L0001059 , L0001060 , L0001061 , L0001062 , L0001063 , L0001064 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 15
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINED AS URBAN SOURCES ***
URBAN ID URBAN POP SOURCE IDs
-------- --------- ----------
2035210. L0000338 , L0000339 , L0000340 , L0000341 , L0000342 , L0000343 , L0000344 ,
L0000345 ,
L0000346 , L0000347 , L0000348 , L0000349 , L0000350 , L0000351 , L0000352 , L0000353 ,
L0000354 , L0000355 , L0000356 , L0000357 , L0000358 , L0000359 , L0000360 , L0000361 ,
L0000362 , L0000363 , L0000364 , L0000365 , L0000366 , L0000367 , L0000368 , L0000369 ,
L0000370 , L0000371 , L0000372 , L0000373 , L0000374 , L0000375 , L0000376 , L0000377 ,
L0000378 , L0000379 , L0000380 , L0000381 , L0000382 , L0000383 , L0000384 , L0000385 ,
L0000386 , L0000387 , L0000388 , L0000389 , L0000390 , L0000391 , L0000392 , L0000393 ,
L0000394 , L0000395 , L0000396 , L0000397 , L0000398 , L0000399 , L0000400 , L0000401 ,
L0000402 , L0000403 , L0000404 , L0000405 , L0000406 , L0000407 , L0000408 , L0000409 ,
L0000410 , L0000738 , L0000739 , L0000740 , L0000741 , L0000742 , L0000743 , L0000744 ,
L0000745 , L0000746 , L0000747 , L0000748 , L0000749 , L0000750 , L0000751 , L0000752 ,
L0000753 , L0000754 , L0000755 , L0000756 , L0000757 , L0000758 , 4159 L0000759 , L0000760 ,
L0000761 , L0000762 , L0000763 , L0000764 , L0000765 , L0000766 , L0000767 , L0000768 ,
L0000769 , L0000770 , L0000771 , L0000772 , L0000773 , L0000774 , L0000775 , L0000776 ,
L0000777 , L0000778 , L0000779 , L0000780 , L0000781 , L0000782 , L0000783 , L0000784 ,
L0000785 , L0000786 , L0000787 , L0000788 , L0000789 , L0000790 , L0000791 , L0000792 ,
L0000793 , L0000794 , L0000795 , L0000796 , L0000797 , L0000798 , L0000799 , L0000800 ,
L0000801 , L0000802 , L0000803 , L0000804 , L0000805 , L0000806 , L0000807 , L0000808 ,
L0000809 , L0000810 , L0000811 , L0000812 , L0000813 , L0000814 , L0000815 , L0000816 ,
L0000817 , L0000818 , L0000819 , L0000820 , L0000821 , L0000822 , L0000823 , L0000824 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 16
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINED AS URBAN SOURCES ***
URBAN ID URBAN POP SOURCE IDs
-------- --------- ----------
L0000825 , L0000826 , L0000827 , L0000828 , L0000829 , L0000830 , L0000831 , L0000832 ,
L0000833 , L0000834 , L0000835 , L0000836 , L0000837 , L0000838 , L0000839 , L0000840 ,
L0000841 , L0000842 , L0000843 , L0000844 , L0000845 , L0000846 , L0000847 , L0000848 ,
L0000849 , L0000850 , L0000851 , L0000852 , L0000853 , L0000854 , L0000855 , L0000856 ,
L0000857 , L0000858 , L0000859 , L0000860 , L0000861 , L0000862 , L0000863 , L0000864 ,
L0000865 , L0000866 , L0000867 , L0000868 , L0000869 , L0000870 , L0000871 , L0000872 ,
L0000873 , L0000874 , L0000875 , L0000876 , L0000877 , L0000878 , L0000879 , L0000880 ,
L0000881 , L0000882 , L0000883 , L0000884 , L0000885 , L0000886 , L0000887 , L0000888 ,
L0000889 , L0000890 , L0000891 , L0000892 , L0000893 , L0000894 , L0000895 , L0000896 , 4160
L0000897 , L0000898 , L0000899 , L0000900 , L0000901 , L0000902 , L0000903 , L0000904 ,
L0000905 , L0000906 , L0000907 , L0000908 , L0000909 , L0000910 , L0000911 , L0000912 ,
L0000913 , L0000914 , L0000915 , L0000916 , L0000917 , L0000918 , L0000919 , L0000920 ,
L0000921 , L0000922 , L0000923 , L0000924 , L0000925 , L0000926 , L0000927 , L0000928 ,
L0000929 , L0000930 , L0000931 , L0000932 , L0000933 , L0000934 , L0000935 , L0000936 ,
L0000937 , L0000938 , L0000939 , L0000940 , L0000941 , L0000942 , L0000943 , L0000944 ,
L0000945 , L0000946 , L0000947 , L0000948 , L0000949 , L0000950 , L0000951 , L0000952 ,
L0000953 , L0000954 , L0000955 , L0000956 , L0000957 , L0000958 , L0000959 , L0000960 ,
L0000961 , L0000962 , L0000963 , L0000964 , L0000965 , L0000966 , L0000967 , L0000968 ,
L0000969 , L0000970 , L0000971 , L0000972 , L0000973 , L0000974 , L0000975 , L0000976 ,
L0000977 , L0000978 , L0000979 , L0000980 , L0000981 , L0000982 , L0000983 , L0000984 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 17
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** SOURCE IDs DEFINED AS URBAN SOURCES ***
URBAN ID URBAN POP SOURCE IDs
-------- --------- ----------
L0000985 , L0000986 , L0000987 , L0000988 , L0000989 , L0000990 , L0000991 , L0000992 ,
L0000993 , L0000994 , L0000995 , L0000996 , L0000997 , L0000998 , L0000999 , L0001000 ,
L0001001 , L0001002 , L0001003 , L0001004 , L0001005 , L0001006 , L0001007 , L0001008 ,
L0001009 , L0001010 , L0001011 , L0001012 , L0001013 , L0001014 , L0001015 , L0001016 ,
L0001017 , L0001018 , L0001019 , L0001020 , L0001021 , L0001022 , L0001023 , L0001024 ,
L0001025 , L0001026 , L0001027 , L0001028 , L0001029 , L0001030 , L0001031 , L0001032 ,
4161
L0001033 , L0001034 , L0001035 , L0001036 , L0001037 , L0001038 , L0001039 , L0001040 ,
L0001041 , L0001042 , L0001043 , L0001044 , L0001045 , L0001046 , L0001047 , L0001048 ,
L0001049 , L0001050 , L0001051 , L0001052 , L0001053 , L0001054 , L0001055 , L0001056 ,
L0001057 , L0001058 , L0001059 , L0001060 , L0001061 , L0001062 , L0001063 , L0001064 ,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 18
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS ***
(X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG)
(METERS)
( 450497.4, 3769490.5, 301.2, 301.2, 0.0); ( 450800.7, 3769496.4, 301.2, 301.2, 0.0);
( 450844.7, 3769482.7, 300.8, 300.8, 0.0); ( 450443.3, 3769464.3, 300.9, 300.9, 0.0);
( 450501.5, 3769327.5, 299.2, 299.2, 0.0); ( 450500.6, 3769279.8, 298.7, 298.7, 0.0);
( 450904.5, 3769273.6, 298.7, 298.7, 0.0); ( 450904.5, 3769256.7, 298.3, 298.3, 0.0);
( 451224.7, 3769252.7, 296.5, 296.5, 0.0); ( 451223.3, 3769282.5, 297.0, 297.0, 0.0);
( 451085.8, 3769299.7, 297.7, 297.7, 0.0); ( 451203.8, 3769285.4, 297.1, 297.1, 0.0);
( 450660.4, 3769097.0, 298.3, 298.3, 0.0); ( 451202.0, 3769091.5, 294.3, 294.3, 0.0);
( 450843.3, 3769093.9, 296.0, 296.0, 0.0); ( 451065.3, 3769091.5, 295.0, 295.0, 0.0);
( 450488.4, 3769125.6, 297.5, 297.5, 0.0); ( 450365.0, 3769200.8, 297.4, 297.4, 0.0);
( 449491.0, 3769987.6, 306.4, 306.4, 0.0); ( 451310.5, 3769494.7, 298.9, 298.9, 0.0);
( 451571.6, 3769299.6, 300.9, 300.9, 0.0); ( 451412.2, 3769298.4, 297.6, 297.6, 0.0);
( 451467.2, 3769186.0, 296.7, 296.7, 0.0); ( 449272.9, 3769950.8, 304.9, 304.9, 0.0);
( 449463.3, 3769963.2, 305.9, 305.9, 0.0); ( 449418.9, 3769937.8, 305.4, 305.4, 0.0);
( 449134.5, 3770074.5, 305.9, 305.9, 0.0); ( 448757.9, 3770086.1, 305.4, 305.4, 0.0);
( 451123.0, 3769118.2, 295.2, 295.2, 0.0); ( 453236.6, 3767558.9, 279.1, 279.1, 0.0);
( 453308.3, 3767535.1, 279.2, 279.2, 0.0); ( 453281.0, 3767662.3, 280.5, 280.5, 0.0);
( 453784.7, 3767275.2, 274.3, 274.3, 0.0); ( 453764.7, 3767244.9, 273.9, 273.9, 0.0);
( 448293.4, 3770898.6, 316.0, 316.0, 0.0); ( 448374.2, 3771008.4, 318.1, 318.1, 0.0);
( 448407.8, 3771051.1, 318.9, 318.9, 0.0); ( 451567.7, 3769513.9, 304.1, 304.1, 0.0);
( 451567.3, 3769558.7, 304.5, 304.5, 0.0); ( 451504.3, 3769499.8, 301.8, 301.8, 0.0);
( 451404.2, 3769478.0, 299.6, 299.6, 0.0); ( 451080.2, 3769366.8, 298.5, 298.5, 0.0);
( 451083.4, 3769345.3, 298.2, 298.2, 0.0); ( 451855.6, 3769413.3, 4162 300.9, 300.9, 0.0);
( 451858.8, 3769297.5, 299.2, 299.2, 0.0); ( 451877.2, 3769588.2, 303.3, 303.3, 0.0);
( 451769.8, 3769173.3, 296.9, 296.9, 0.0); ( 451225.0, 3771073.4, 322.8, 322.8, 0.0);
( 451290.9, 3771093.6, 323.3, 323.3, 0.0); ( 451164.5, 3771074.8, 322.3, 322.3, 0.0);
( 451104.0, 3771097.6, 321.9, 321.9, 0.0); ( 451062.3, 3771139.3, 322.2, 322.2, 0.0);
( 451009.9, 3771061.3, 321.1, 321.1, 0.0); ( 448691.5, 3769705.9, 299.7, 299.7, 0.0);
( 449617.9, 3769283.1, 297.9, 297.9, 0.0); ( 448536.2, 3769286.4, 294.6, 294.6, 0.0);
( 449612.9, 3769208.8, 296.4, 296.4, 0.0); ( 450097.6, 3769277.4, 298.4, 298.4, 0.0);
( 450354.4, 3769284.8, 298.8, 298.8, 0.0); ( 450184.3, 3769203.9, 297.4, 297.4, 0.0);
( 449168.7, 3769208.8, 295.9, 295.9, 0.0); ( 448793.9, 3769211.3, 294.5, 294.5, 0.0);
( 448534.6, 3769957.7, 302.3, 302.3, 0.0); ( 448442.1, 3770018.0, 302.9, 302.9, 0.0);
( 448348.8, 3769949.5, 302.2, 302.2,
0.0);
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 19
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** METEOROLOGICAL DAYS SELECTED FOR PROCESSING ***
(1=YES; 0=NO)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NOTE: METEOROLOGICAL DATA ACTUALLY PROCESSED WILL ALSO DEPEND ON WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE DATA FILE.
*** UPPER BOUND OF FIRST THROUGH FIFTH WIND SPEED CATEGORIES ***
(METERS/SEC)
1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80,
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 20 4163
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** UP TO THE FIRST 24 HOURS OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA *** Surface file:
KONT_V9_ADJU\KONT_v9.SFC Met
Version: 16216
Profile file:
KONT_V9_ADJU\KONT_v9.PFL
Surface format:
FREE
Profile format:
FREE
Surface station no.: 3102 Upper air station no.: 3190
Name: UNKNOWN Name:
UNKNOWN
Year: 2012 Year: 2012
First 24 hours of scalar data
YR MO DY JDY HR H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS
WD HT REF TA HT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
12 01 01 1 01 -16.4 0.171 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 170. 32.3 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.03
43. 7.9 285.9 2.0
12 01 01 1 02 -18.8 0.194 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 205. 41.3 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.28
34. 7.9 285.4 2.0
12 01 01 1 03 -17.8 0.182 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 187. 36.5 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.15
24. 7.9 282.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 04 -9.4 0.128 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 110. 19.6 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.55
41. 7.9 283.1 2.0
12 01 01 1 05 -16.9 0.173 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 173. 33.0 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.05
39. 7.9 280.4 2.0
12 01 01 1 06 -8.0 0.117 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 97. 17.8 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.43
21. 7.9 282.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 07 -7.6 0.115 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 93. 17.4 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.40
31. 7.9 282.5 2.0
12 01 01 1 08 -13.6 0.184 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 190. 40.5 0.09 1.12 0.54 2.16
34. 7.9 284.2 2.0
12 01 01 1 09 28.4 0.126 0.300 0.011 33. 108. -6.2 0.09 1.12 0.32 1.03
29. 7.9 289.2 2.0
12 01 01 1 10 79.8 0.133 0.607 0.010 99. 116. -2.6 0.09 1.12 0.25 0.94 173. 7.9 292.5 2.0
12 01 01 1 11 115.8 0.137 0.932 0.006 246. 121. -2.0 0.09 1.12 0.22 0.92 172. 7.9 295.4 2.0
12 01 01 1 12 133.7 0.139 1.197 0.005 453. 125. -1.8 0.09 1.12 0.21 0.92 146. 7.9 297.5 2.0
12 01 01 1 13 133.2 0.160 1.354 0.005 657. 153. -2.7 0.09 1.12 0.21 1.14 117. 7.9 299.9 2.0
12 01 01 1 14 113.5 0.159 1.454 0.005 955. 151. -3.1 0.09 1.12 0.23 1.16 285. 7.9 300.9 2.0
12 01 01 1 15 76.2 0.166 1.350 0.005 1138. 163. -5.3 0.09 1.12 0.26 1.33
72. 7.9 302.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 16 23.5 0.175 0.925 0.005 1183. 175. -19.9 0.09 1.12 0.35 1.65 107. 7.9 301.4 2.0
12 01 01 1 17 -6.1 0.107 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 86. 18.0 0.09 1.12 0.63 1.31 107. 7.9 298.1 2.0
12 01 01 1 18 -11.1 0.141 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 127. 22.1 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.69
86. 7.9 293.1 2.0
12 01 01 1 19 -3.2 0.076 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 51. 11.8 0.09 1.12 1.00 0.91
64. 7.9 292.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 20 -2.3 0.066 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 41. 11.2 0.09 1.12 1.00 0.74
73. 7.9 288.8 2.0
12 01 01 1 21 -10.0 0.133 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 116. 20.5 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.60 4164
14. 7.9 288.1 2.0
12 01 01 1 22 -19.4 0.201 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 216. 44.5 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.36
22. 7.9 287.5 2.0
12 01 01 1 23 -23.7 0.246 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 293. 66.5 0.09 1.12 1.00 2.86
40. 7.9 287.0 2.0
12 01 01 1 24 -12.3 0.147 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 139. 23.8 0.09 1.12 1.00 1.76
40. 7.9 283.8 2.0
First hour of profile data
YR MO DY HR HEIGHT F WDIR WSPD AMB_TMP sigmaA sigmaW sigmaV 12 01 01 01 7.9 1 43. 2.03 286.0 99.0 -99.00 -99.00
F indicates top of profile (=1) or below (=0)
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 21
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** THE ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION VALUES AVERAGED OVER 5 YEARS FOR SOURCE GROUP: ALL ***
INCLUDING SOURCE(S): L0000338 , L0000339 ,
L0000340 , L0000341 , L0000342 ,
L0000343 , L0000344 , L0000345 , L0000346 , L0000347 ,
L0000348 , L0000349 , L0000350 ,
L0000351 , L0000352 , L0000353 , L0000354 , L0000355 ,
L0000356 , L0000357 , L0000358 ,
L0000359 , L0000360 , L0000361 , L0000362 , L0000363 ,
L0000364 , L0000365 , . . . ,
*** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTOR POINTS ***
** CONC OF DPM IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
X-COORD (M) Y-COORD (M) CONC X-COORD (M) Y-COORD
(M) CONC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
450497.39 3769490.46 0.00049 450800.72
3769496.41 0.00086
450844.74 3769482.73 0.00096 450443.26
3769464.29 0.00045
450501.53 3769327.46 0.00126 450500.56
3769279.81 0.00171
450904.52 3769273.57 0.00358 450904.52
3769256.68 0.00303
451224.66 3769252.72 0.00077 451223.34
3769282.54 0.00063
451085.83 3769299.70 0.00094 451203.81
3769285.44 0.00066
450660.39 3769097.00 0.00099 451201.96
3769091.46 0.00029
450843.34 3769093.95 0.00073 451065.35
3769091.46 0.00038
450488.39 3769125.56 0.00082 450365.04
3769200.78 0.00068
449490.95 3769987.56 0.00005 451310.46
3769494.69 0.00044
451571.63 3769299.56 0.00042 451412.20
3769298.37 0.00044
451467.16 3769185.97 0.00045 449272.92
3769950.83 0.00005 4165
449463.32 3769963.25 0.00005 449418.90
3769937.78 0.00005
449134.45 3770074.53 0.00004 448757.86
3770086.14 0.00004
451123.04 3769118.25 0.00038 453236.59
3767558.94 0.00001
453308.35 3767535.11 0.00001 453281.04
3767662.29 0.00001
453784.70 3767275.20 0.00001 453764.70
3767244.94 0.00001
448293.38 3770898.58 0.00001 448374.25
3771008.42 0.00001
448407.77 3771051.14 0.00001 451567.70
3769513.90 0.00040
451567.29 3769558.70 0.00039 451504.33
3769499.78 0.00035
451404.23 3769477.98 0.00038 451080.25
3769366.84 0.00099
451083.41 3769345.35 0.00098 451855.58
3769413.29 0.00022
451858.79 3769297.51 0.00019 451877.19
3769588.22 0.00021
451769.79 3769173.32 0.00018 451225.00
3771073.42 0.00002
451290.87 3771093.58 0.00002 451164.51
3771074.76 0.00002
451104.02 3771097.62 0.00002 451062.35
3771139.29 0.00002
451009.92 3771061.32 0.00002 448691.48
3769705.89 0.00011
449617.88 3769283.15 0.00037 448536.25
3769286.45 0.00042
449612.93 3769208.84 0.00035 450097.60
3769277.37 0.00047
450354.38 3769284.80 0.00065 450184.29
3769203.88 0.00047
449168.72 3769208.84 0.00030 448793.86
3769211.31 0.00029
448534.60 3769957.72 0.00016 448442.13
3770017.99 0.00005
448348.82 3769949.46
0.00005
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 22
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** THE SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM ANNUAL RESULTS AVERAGED OVER 5 YEARS ***
** CONC OF DPM IN
MICROGRAMS/M**3 **
NETWORK
GROUP ID AVERAGE CONC RECEPTOR (XR, YR, ZELEV, ZHILL,
ZFLAG) OF TYPE GRID-ID
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ALL 1ST HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00358 AT ( 450904.52, 3769273.57, 298.65, 4166 298.65, 0.00) DC
2ND HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00303 AT ( 450904.52, 3769256.68, 298.30, 298.30, 0.00) DC
3RD HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00171 AT ( 450500.56, 3769279.81, 298.74, 298.74, 0.00) DC
4TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00126 AT ( 450501.53, 3769327.46, 299.22, 299.22, 0.00) DC
5TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00099 AT ( 451080.25, 3769366.84, 298.50, 298.50, 0.00) DC
6TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00099 AT ( 450660.39, 3769097.00, 298.29, 298.29, 0.00) DC
7TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00098 AT ( 451083.41, 3769345.35, 298.25, 298.25, 0.00) DC
8TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00096 AT ( 450844.74, 3769482.73, 300.84, 300.84, 0.00) DC
9TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00094 AT ( 451085.83, 3769299.70, 297.72, 297.72, 0.00) DC
10TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 0.00086 AT ( 450800.72, 3769496.41, 301.24, 301.24, 0.00) DC
*** RECEPTOR TYPES: GC = GRIDCART
GP = GRIDPOLR
DC = DISCCART
DP = DISCPOLR
FF *** AERMOD - VERSION 23132 *** *** C:\Users\Michael Tirohn\Desktop\HRAs\14539 IE Distribution\14539 Ops *** 10/28/24
*** AERMET - VERSION 16216 ***
*** *** 13:28:52
PAGE 23
*** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV URBAN ADJ_U*
*** Message Summary : AERMOD Model Execution ***
--------- Summary of Total Messages --------
A Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s)
A Total of 2 Warning Message(s)
A Total of 1628 Informational Message(s)
A Total of 43848 Hours Were Processed
A Total of 1278 Calm Hours Identified
A Total of 350 Missing Hours Identified ( 0.80 Percent) ******** FATAL ERROR MESSAGES ********
*** NONE ***
******** WARNING MESSAGES ********
ME W186 953 MEOPEN: THRESH_1MIN 1-min ASOS wind speed threshold used 0.50 ME W187 953 MEOPEN: ADJ_U* Option for Stable Low Winds used in AERMET ************************************
*** AERMOD Finishes Successfully ***
************************************
4167
14539-05 HRA Memo
ATTACHMENT C
RISK CALCULATIONS
4168
Source Weight Contaminant
Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RfD RESP CNS/PNS CV/BL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m3) (mg/m3) (ug/m3)
-1 (mg/kg/day)-1 (mg/kg-day) (ug/m3
) (mg/kg/day)
( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) ( g ) ( h ) (i ) ( j ) ( k) ( l ) ( m ) ( n ) ( o ) ( p ) ( q ) ( r) ( s)
0.00001 1.00E-08 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 3.5E-09 1.1E-10 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 2.0E-06 TOTAL 1.1E-10 2.0E-06 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints
RESP Respiratory System
CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System
CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System
IMMUN Immune System
KIDN Kidney
GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver
REPRO Reproductive System (e.g. teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects
Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency (days/year) 350
exposure duration (years) 0.25
inhalation rate (L/kg-day)) 361
inhalation absorption factor 1
averaging time (years) 70
fraction of time at home 0.85
age sensitivity factor (age third trimester 10
Table 1
Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards -0.25 to 0 Age Bin Exposure Scenario
Mass GLC Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/ Toxicological Endpoints** 4169
Source Weight Contaminant
Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RfD RESP CNS/PNS CV/BL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m3) (mg/m3) (ug/m3)
-1 (mg/kg/day)-1 (mg/kg-day) (ug/m3
) (mg/kg/day)
( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) ( g ) ( h ) (i ) ( j ) ( k) ( l ) ( m ) ( n ) ( o ) ( p ) ( q ) ( r) ( s)
0.00001 1.00E-08 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 1.0E-08 2.7E-09 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 2.0E-06 TOTAL 2.7E-09 2.0E-06 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints
RESP Respiratory System
CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System
CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System
IMMUN Immune System
KIDN Kidney
GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver
REPRO Reproductive System (e.g. teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects
Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency (days/year) 350
exposure duration (years) 2
inhalation rate (L/kg-day)) 1090
inhalation absorption factor 1
averaging time (years) 70
fraction of time at home 0.85
age sensitivity factor (0 to 2 years old) 10
Table 2
Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards 0-2 Age Bin Exposure Scenario
Mass GLC Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/ Toxicological Endpoints** 4170
Source Weight Contaminant
Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RfD RESP CNS/PNS CV/BL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m3) (mg/m3) (ug/m3)
-1 (mg/kg/day)-1 (mg/kg-day) (ug/m3
) (mg/kg/day)
( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) ( g ) ( h ) (i ) ( j ) ( k) ( l ) ( m ) ( n ) ( o ) ( p ) ( q ) ( r) ( s)
0.00001 1.00E-08 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 5.5E-09 2.5E-09 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 2.0E-06 TOTAL 2.5E-09 2.0E-06 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints
RESP Respiratory System
CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System
CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System
IMMUN Immune System
KIDN Kidney
GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver
REPRO Reproductive System (e.g. teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects
Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency (days/year) 350
exposure duration (years) 14
inhalation rate (L/kg-day)) 572
inhalation absorption factor 1
averaging time (years) 70
fraction of time at home 0.72
age sensitivity factor (ages 2 to 16 years 3
Table 3
Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards 2-16 Age Bin Exposure Scenario
Mass GLC Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/ Toxicological Endpoints** 4171
Source Weight Contaminant
Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RfD RESP CNS/PNS CV/BL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m3) (mg/m3) (ug/m3)
-1 (mg/kg/day)-1 (mg/kg-day) (ug/m3
) (mg/kg/day)
( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) ( g ) ( h ) (i ) ( j ) ( k) ( l ) ( m ) ( n ) ( o ) ( p ) ( q ) ( r) ( s)
0.00001 1.00E-08 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 2.5E-09 3.8E-10 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 2.0E-06 TOTAL 3.8E-10 2.0E-06 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00
0.00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints
RESP Respiratory System
CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System
CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System
IMMUN Immune System
KIDN Kidney
GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver
REPRO Reproductive System (e.g. teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects
Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency (days/year) 350
exposure duration (years) 14
inhalation rate (L/kg-day)) 261
inhalation absorption factor 1
averaging time (years) 70
fraction of time at home 0.73
age sensitivity factor (ages 16 to 30 years old) 1
Total Risk for All Age Bins (per million) 0.006
Table 4
Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards 16-30 Age Bin Exposure Scenario
Mass GLC Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/ Toxicological Endpoints** 4172
Table 5
Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Risks 25-Year Worker Exposure Scenario
Source Weight Contaminant
Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RfD RESP CNS/PNS CV/BL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m3) (mg/m3
) (ug/m3)
-1 (mg/kg/day)-1 (mg/kg-day) (ug/m3
) (mg/kg/day)
( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) ( g ) ( h ) (i ) ( j ) ( k) ( l ) ( m ) ( n ) ( o ) ( p ) ( q ) ( r) ( s) 1 Diesel Particulates 3.58E-03 3.58E-06 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 5.6E-07 2.1E-07 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 7.2E-04 TOTAL 2.1E-07 7.2E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00
0.21 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake RESP Respiratory System exposure frequency (days/year) 250 CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System exposure duration (years) 25 CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System inhalation rate (L/kg-day)) 230 IMMUN Immune System inhalation absorption factor 1
KIDN Kidney averaging time (years) 70
GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver
REPRO Reproductive System (e.g. teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects
Mass GLC Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/ Toxicological Endpoints** 5 of 5
4173
Source Weight Contaminant
Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RfD RESP CNS/PNS CV/BL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m3) (mg/m3) (ug/m3)
-1 (mg/kg/day)-1 (mg/kg-day) (ug/m3
) (mg/kg/day)
( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) ( g ) ( h ) (i ) ( j ) ( k) ( l ) ( m ) ( n ) ( o ) ( p ) ( q ) ( r) ( s)
0.00096 9.60E-07 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 1.7E-07 2.5E-09 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 1.9E-04 TOTAL 2.5E-09 1.9E-04 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00
0.00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints
RESP Respiratory System
CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System
CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System
IMMUN Immune System
KIDN Kidney
GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver
REPRO Reproductive System (e.g. teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects
Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency (days/year) 250
exposure duration (years) 0.96
inhalation rate (L/kg-day)) 261
inhalation absorption factor 1
averaging time (years) 70
fraction of time at home 1.00
age sensitivity factor (ages 16 to 30 year 1
Table 1
Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards West Valley Detention Center Exposure Scenario - Construction Activity Mass GLC Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/ Toxicological Endpoints** 4174
Source Weight Contaminant
Fraction URF CPF DOSE RISK REL RfD RESP CNS/PNS CV/BL IMMUN KIDN GI/LV REPRO EYES (ug/m3) (mg/m3) (ug/m3)
-1 (mg/kg/day)-1 (mg/kg-day) (ug/m3
) (mg/kg/day)
( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) ( g ) ( h ) (i ) ( j ) ( k) ( l ) ( m ) ( n ) ( o ) ( p ) ( q ) ( r) ( s)
0.00002 2.00E-08 1.00E+00 Diesel Particulate 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 5.0E-09 2.3E-09 5.0E+00 1.4E-03 4.0E-06 TOTAL 2.3E-09 4.0E-06 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00 0.0E+00
0.00 ** Key to Toxicological Endpoints
RESP Respiratory System
CNS/PNS Central/Peripheral Nervous System
CV/BL Cardiovascular/Blood System
IMMUN Immune System
KIDN Kidney
GI/LV Gastrointestinal System/Liver
REPRO Reproductive System (e.g. teratogenic and developmental effects) EYES Eye irritation and/or other effects
Note: Exposure factors used to calculate contaminant intake exposure frequency (days/year) 350
exposure duration (years) 30
inhalation rate (L/kg-day)) 261
inhalation absorption factor 1
averaging time (years) 70
fraction of time at home 1.00
age sensitivity factor (ages 16 to 30 years old) 1
Table 4
Quantification of Carcinogenic Risks and Noncarcinogenic Hazards West Valley Detention Center Exposure Scenario - Operational Activity Mass GLC Carcinogenic Risk Noncarcinogenic Hazards/ Toxicological Endpoints** 4175
RESOLUTION NO. ________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,
CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO CERTIFY THE 5355 EAST AIRPORT
DRIVE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2022090006) FOR A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 270,337 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON
13.08 ACRES OF LAND FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5355 EAST
AIRPORT DRIVE, WITHIN THE IH (HEAVY INDUSTRIAL) ZONING
DISTRICT, AND ADOPT ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND A MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF—APNS: 0238-052-29 AND 0238-052-20.
WHEREAS, PROLOGIS ("Applicant") has filed an Application for the approval of a Development Plan, File No. PDEV22-017, as described in the title of this Resolution (hereinafter referred to as "Application" or "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Application applies to 13.08 acres of land located at 5355 East Airport Drive, within the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district, and is presently improved with five industrial structures. All existing structures and improvements will be demolished to allow for construction of the 270,337 square-foot industrial warehouse building; and WHEREAS, on April 5, 2022, the Applicant submitted a Development Plan (File No. PDEV22-017) to construct a 270,337 square-foot industrial building on 13.08 acres of land located at 5355 East Airport Drive, within the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district; and
WHEREAS, the property abutting the Project site to the north is a Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, and properties beyond are developed with existing industrial land uses within the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district of the Shea Business Center. The property to the south of the Project site (across Airport Drive Street) is zoned IH (Heavy Industrial) and consists of two existing warehouse buildings. The property to the east of the Project site in the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district and is developed with an industrial gas supplier. The property to the west of the Project site in the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district and is developed with a Verizon facility; and WHEREAS, the 5355 East Airport Drive Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2022090006) was prepared (hereinafter referred to as "final EIR"), in which development and use of the Project site was discussed; and WHEREAS, the final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations was made available to the public and to all interested agencies for review and comment pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Ontario Local CEQA Guidelines; and 4176
WHEREAS, the final EIR, for the Project consists of the Draft SEIR and the comments and responses to comments made on the Draft SEIR; and WHEREAS, the final EIR Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Ontario Guidelines for implementation of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the DEIR for the Project was circulated for a 45-day public review period and a notice of its availability was published in a local newspaper, submitted to the state clearinghouse, and posted in the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County; and
WHEREAS, copies of the final EIR was distributed to the City Council, Planning Commission, City departments, and federal, state, regional, local, and other agencies and individuals; and
WHEREAS, Ontario Development Code Table 2.01-1 (Review Matrix) establishes that the Planning Commission has the responsibility and authority to review and act upon Interpretations and Land Use Determinations; and
WHEREAS, in response to the Appellants basis for the appeal staff has prepared a response to each of the items. Below is the Appellants statement and staff's response:
Appellant's Issue No. 1: The Final EIR fails to analyze the full scope of the Project, in particular in relation to the Project's reasonably foreseeable use as a parcel hub (a use that generates 2.6 times more trips than analyzed).
Staff Response: This comment is similar to Response to Comment A-6 in the Final EIR, 1-8 in the applicants Response To Comments (RTC) dated May 20, 2024, and CARE-7 in the RTC dated August 8, 2024. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-6 (Final EIR, pp. 2-38, 2-39), RTC 1-8 (RTC, p. 3), and RTC CARE-7 (RTC, p. 3). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR trip generation estimates and all environmental impacts related to or attributable to Project's trip generation. There is no reasonable possibility that the Project, as designed, could operate as a parcel hub.
No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required. Additionally, revised conditions of approval for PDEV22-017 prohibit the primary use of the building being established as a parcel hub.
Appellant's Issue No. 2: The commenter reiterates prior comments that the Final EIR fails to analyze reasonably foreseeable truck trips to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, which are longer than the trips analyzed in the Final EIR.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1- 16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 4177
43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant's Issue No. 3: The Final EIR fails to include sufficient investigation into energy conservation measures that might be available or appropriate for the Project, as required by the CEQA Guidelines.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-20 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-17, CARE-18, and CARE-21 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC 1- 20 (RTC, pp. 8 to 10, and RTC CARE-17, CARE-18, and CARE-21 (RTC, p. 6).
The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant's Issue No. 4: The Final EIR's analysis of cumulative air quality impacts is inadequate because it fails to consider the Project's impacts in the context of the numerous other warehouses existing and planned in the area.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-14 in the Final EIR, 1-10 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 in the RTC dated August
8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-14 (Final EIR, pp. 2-41, 2-42), RTC Comment 1-8 (RTC, p. 4, 5), and RTC CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 (RTC, pp. 3 to 4). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of air quality impacts including analysis of cumulative air quality impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant's Issue No. 5: The Final EIR's quantified health risk analysis underestimates impacts because it analyzed trucks travelling only east along Airport Drive, not accounting for building downwash and relying on unreliable input values.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-12, 1-13, 1-41 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-13, CARE-27, and CARE-28 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC 1-12, 1-13, and 1-41 (RTC, pp. 5, 14 to 16), and RTC CARE-13, CARE-27, CARE-28 (RTC, pp. 4,7). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of health risk impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections to the EIR are necessary, and no further response is required.
4178
Appellant's Issue No. 6: The Final EIR identifies significant vapor intrusion impacts due to tetrachloroethylene (PCE) contamination, but improperly defers formulation of mitigation measures.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC CARE-4, CARE-5, and CARE-6 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC CARE-4, CARE-5, and CARE-6 (RTC, pp. 2, 3). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of vapor intrusion impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections to the EIR are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 7: The Final EIR is deficient as a matter of law and its conclusions are not supported by substantial evidence based on the previous comments made.
Staff Response: The commenter asserts that the Planning Commission's approval decision must be vacated, and the EIR must be revised and recirculated in compliance with CEQA. Contrary to the commenter's assertion, this memorandum, RTCs (dated May 20 and August 8), and Final EIR demonstrates that the Project's impacts have been adequately analyzed and mitigated. Thus, no additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary.
Appellant Issue No. 8: The commenter cites to Section 4.02.025(D) of the City's Municipal Code and assets that the Project would have significant and unavoidable VMT impact, potential health risk, air quality, GHG, energy, and soil contamination impacts that have been underestimated.
Staff Response: The commenter asserts that the City cannot make the requisite findings to approve the Project and a revised EIR must be recirculated before the Project can be recommended for approval. Contrary to the commenter's assertion, this memorandum, prior RTCs (dated May 20 and August 8), and Final EIR demonstrates that the Project's impacts have been adequately analyzed and mitigated as feasible. Thus, no additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary.
Appellant Issue No. 9: The commenter provides previously submitted comment letters as Attachments A through D to the appeal letter.
Staff Response: Attachment A includes a comment letter dated October 5, 2023, which has been responded to in the Project's Final EIR. Attachment B includes a comment letter dated April 15, 2024, which has been response to in the RTC dated May 20, 2024. Attachment C is a comment letter dated May 28, 2024, which has been responded to in the RTC dated August 8, 2024. Response to Attachment D is provided below in RTC CARECA-13 to CARECA-33 in the applicant's response.
Appellant Issue No. 10: This comment consists of introductory remarks, identifies that the comments in this letter are being provided by Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo on behalf of CARECA, and provides a summary of prior comments submitted concerning the Project during the Draft's EIR public review period, and on the Final EIR.
4179
Staff Response: The commenter claims that the RTC, dated August 8, 2024, failed to resolve asserted flaws that CARE CA and its experts identified in the Draft EIR and that the Planning Commission should require the City to revised and recirculate the EIR before any further action is taken on the Project. Response to the comments made in this letter are provided below in the following issues and responses below. Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 11: The commenter reiterates previous comments about the conclusions of the Project's Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA; Technical Appendix G to the Draft EIR) regarding ethylbenzene concentration and opines the Final EIR improperly defers formulation of mitigation for PCE and ethylbenzene contamination.
Staff Response: Refer to responses above and RTC CARE-4, CARE-5, and CARE-6 in the RTC dated August 8, 2024. Refer to RTC CARE-4, CARE-5, and CARE-6 (RTC, pp. 2, 3). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of vapor intrusion impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections to the EIR are necessary and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 12: The commenter reiterates previous comments regarding the Project's potential as a High Cube Parcel Hub Warehouse and that trip generated by the Project are not adequately analyzed.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-6 in the Final EIR, 1-8 in the RTC dated May 20, 2024, and CARE-7 in the RTC dated August 8, 2024. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-6 (Final EIR, pp. 2-38, 2-39), RTC 1-8 (RTC, p. 3), and RTC CARE-7 (RTC, p. 3). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR trip generation estimates and all environmental impacts related to or attributable to Project's trip generation. There is no reasonable possibility that the Project, as designed, could operate as a parcel hub. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required. Additionally, as previously noted, revised conditions of approval for PDEV22-017 prohibit the primary use of the building being established as a parcel hub.
Appellant Issue No. 13: The commenter reiterates previous comments that the Final EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is inadequate because it fails to consider the cumulative impacts of past, present, and probable future projects.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-14 in the Final EIR, 1-10 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 in the RTC dated August
8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-14 (Final EIR, pp. 2-41, 2-42), RTC 1-8 (RTC, p. 4, 5), and RTC CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 (RTC, pp. 3 to 4). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and 4180
adequacy of the EIR analysis of air quality impacts including analysis of cumulative air quality impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 14: The commenter reiterates previous comments that the Project's Health Risk Assessment underestimates health risk impacts on sensitive receptors and failed to account for building downwash and relied on unreliable input values.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-12, 1-13, 1-41 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-13, CARE-27, and CARE-28 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC 1-12, 1-13, and 1-41 (RTC, pp. 5, 14 to 16), and RTC CARE-13, CARE-27, CARE-28 (RTC, pp. 4,7). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of health risk impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections to the EIR are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 15: The commenter reiterates previous comments that Final EIR truck trip length is underestimated.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1-16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 16: The commenter reiterates previous comments that the Project's energy analysis remains inadequate.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-20 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-17, CARE-18, and CARE-21 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC 1- 20 (RTC, pp. 8 to 10, and RTC CARE-17, CARE-18, and CARE-21 (RTC, p. 6).
The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 17: The commenter asserts that the Project's Media Management Plan (Attachment F to the Final EIR) was never attached to the Final EIR that is posted at the City of Ontario's website.
Staff Response: The City thanks the commenter for calling this to the City's attention and the City immediately posted the Media Management Plan to the website. All appendices to the Final EIR are posted on the City's website.
Additionally, the Media Management Plan was provided in all agenda packages 4181
and staff reports for the Project's Development Advisory Board and Planning Commission hearings. The commenter also summarizes the procedures in the Media Management Plan in the event that an unanticipated subsurface structure is discovered and states a site-specific remedial action work (RAW) plan should be initiated to protect workers onsite. The Media Management Plan's implementation is sufficient for ensuring that potential environmental effects are reduced to below a level of significance. Refer to Section 4.3 of the Media Management Plan, which requires adherence to a Health and Safety Plan (HASP) including for construction workers. The HASP will detail all planned construction activities and will describe standard safety precautions (e.g., protective gear for workers, proper soil handling techniques, etc.). The Contractor or the Environmental Professional is responsible for ensuring that the safety precautions detailed in the HASP are implemented and monitored during all activities at the site. The Contractor and the Environmental Professional also are required to abide by all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and codes relating to health and safety and are required by law to adhere to all California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations contained in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (8 CCR), as they apply to activities at the Project site. Additionally, revised conditions of approval for PDEV22-017 require the preparation and implementation of a remedial action work (RAW) plan for construction workers, for the potential of encountering hazardous materials.
Appellant Issue No. 18: The commenter reiterates previous comments that Final EIR truck trip length is underestimated and that the "Warehousing and Distribution Center Facilities in Southern California: The Use of the Commodity Flow Survey Data to Identify Logistics Sprawl and Freight Generation Patterns" by the National Center for Sustainable Transportation (NCST) validates that the majority of facilities in the SCAG region receive goods from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1-16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). Specifically, refer to RTC CARE-16 regarding the low sample size of the study and that the study is not an accurate representation of warehouse facilities in the region. The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 19: The commenter reiterates previous comments the use of a diesel generator was not accounted for in the Project's air quality analysis and that diesel generators are a source of diesel particulate matter (DPM), which is a primary toxic air contaminant (TAC) associated with the Project.
Staff Response: Refer to RTC A-10 in the Final EIR (Final EIR, pp. 2-40 to 2-41) that addresses the use of diesel generator, and which provided a table of 4182
calculations of emissions that would be generated from a 197 horsepower (hp) diesel-powered emergency water pump and a 762 hp diesel-powered emergency backup generator. As shown, emissions would be negligible, and the Project's total emissions would be less than the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) significance threshold. Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 20: The commenter reiterates previous comments that the health risk impacts to the San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center (WVDC) was not analyzed.
Staff Response: Refer to RTC CARE-31 in the RTC dated August 4 (RTC, p. 8).
Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 21: The commenter reiterates previous comments regarding the Project's cumulative impacts analysis.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-14 in the Final EIR, 1-10 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 in the RTC dated August
8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-14 (Final EIR, pp. 2-41, 2-42), RTC 1-8 (RTC, p. 4, 5), and RTC CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 (RTC, pp. 3 to 4). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of air quality impacts including analysis of cumulative air quality impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 22: The commenter reiterates previous comments related to building downwash.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-12 in the RTC dated May 20.
Refer to RTC Comment 1-12 in the RTC (RTC, p. 5) for a full discussion on the reasoning why the Project would not be materially affected by downwash. Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 23: The comment consists of introductory remarks from Smart Mobility and summarizes the findings of the commenter's letter in October 2023, stating that the Draft EIR acknowledges a significant and unavoidable VMT impact, asserting that the proposed VMT mitigation measure is not fully specified or quantified, and claiming that the Project's trip generation and GHG emissions could be much higher than assumed.
Staff Response: As described in the following responses, the commenter's assertions are incorrect. Refer to the comments below. Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 24: The commenter reiterates previous comments and responses made regarding the Project's truck trip length.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1- 16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and 4183
CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 25: The commenter reiterates previous comments and responses made regarding the Project's significant and unavoidable VMT impacts.
Staff Response: The commenter's statements have been previously addressed at Final EIR RTC A-24, which included a calculation of feasible VMT mitigation measures. As stated, measures associated with commute trip reduction (CTR) programs and their related commute trip reduction strategies have been excluded as they are not quantifiable, nor can their implementation be guaranteed and enforced since the Project is proposed to be developed as a speculative building without a known tenant (Final EIR pp. 2-44 to 2-45). Additionally, the commenter reiterated suggestions on requiring zero emission trucks, limiting daily number of trucks allowed at the Project site, and providing electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and electrical hookups for truckers. Refer to RTC B-53 and B-60 in the Final EIR (Final EIR, pp. 2-97 to 2-100) regarding the infeasibility of using zeroemission vehicles and EV charging stations for trucks and 1-33 in the RTC dated May 20 (RTC, p. 13) for limiting daily number of trucks allowed at the Project site.
Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 26: The commenter reiterates previous comments and responses made related to the Project's trip generation assumptions.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1- 16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
WHEREAS, City of Ontario Development Code Division 2.03 (Public Hearings) prescribes the manner in which public notification shall be provided and hearing procedures to be followed, and all such notifications and procedures have been completed; and
WHEREAS, Ontario Development Code Table 2.02-1 (Review Matrix) grants the City Council the responsibility and authority to review and act on the subject appeal Application; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2024, the Development Advisory Board conducted a hearing regarding the subject Application and voted to continue the Project to the next 4184
available DAB meeting to allow staff to work with the applicant to revise draft conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2024, the Development Advisory Board of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Ontario Local CEQA Guidelines, and concluded said hearing on that date, voting to issue Decision No. DAB24- 010, recommending that the Planning Commission approve the final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
WHEREAS, on May 28, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations and the Project, and continued the Project for further consideration; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations and the Project, and concluded said hearing on that date, voting to issue Resolution No. PC24-036, to approve the Application by a vote of 5-0; and
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2024, Aidan Marshall ("Appellant") from Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo, representing CARECA, submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve File No. PDEV22-017. The basis of the Appellant's appeal lies in their belief that the Planning Commission's approval of the Project and certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and land use laws because the City has not complied with its duty to disclose and mitigate the Project's potentially significant environmental and land use impacts, and the Planning Commission's approval findings were not supported by substantial evidence.
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, the City Council of the City of Ontario conducted a public hearing to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve the project, and concluded said hearing on that date; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED, AND RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario, as follows:
SECTION 1: Environmental Determination and Findings. As the decisionmaking body for the Project, the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the final EIR and supporting documentation. Based upon the facts and information contained in the final EIR and supporting documentation, the City Council makes the following findings:
4185
(1) The final EIR contains a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts associated with the Project; and
(2) The final EIR was completed in compliance with CEQA and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder; and
(3) The final EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council.
SECTION 2: City Council Action. Based on the entire record before the City Council and all written and oral evidence presented, the City Council finds the final EIR complies with CEQA for the following reasons:
(a) The final EIR analyzes the environmental effects of the Development Plan (File No. PDEV22-017), and with the implementation of proposed mitigation measures, the following impact will still be significant and unavoidable:
transportation (vehicle miles traveled); and
(b) The City Council further finds that the Findings of Facts and Statement of Overriding Considerations, demonstrates that the benefits of the Development Plan (File No. PDEV22-017) outweigh its significant and unavoidable impact, and therefore the City would be justified in approving Development Plan notwithstanding said significant and unavoidable impact; and
(c) The City Council hereby CERTIFIES the final EIR, adopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program subject to each and every condition set forth in the Department reports attached hereto as "Attachments A, B, and C" and incorporate by this reference.
SECTION 3: Indemnification. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Ontario or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Ontario or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval. The City of Ontario shall promptly notify the applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and the City of Ontario shall cooperate fully in the defense.
SECTION 4: Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Ontario City Hall, 303 East "B" Street, Ontario, California 91764. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City of Ontario.
SECTION 5: Certification to Adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
4186
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2024. _____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
4187
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2024- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 19, 2024 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2024- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 19, 2024. _____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
4188
RESOLUTION NO. _______
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ONTARIO,
CALIFORNIA, DENYING AN APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE FILE NO. PDEV22-017, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 270,337 SQUARE FOOT
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING ON 13.08 ACRES OF LAND FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5355 EAST AIRPORT DRIVE, WITHIN THE IH (HEAVY
INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
SUPPORT THEREOF—APNS: 0238-052-29 AND 0238-052-20.
WHEREAS, PROLOGIS ("Applicant") has filed an Application for the approval of a Development Plan, File No. PDEV22-017, as described in the title of this Resolution (hereinafter referred to as "Application" or "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Application applies to 13.08 acres of land located at 5355 East Airport Drive, within the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district, and is presently improved with five industrial structures. All existing structures and improvements will be demolished to allow for construction of the 270,337 square-foot industrial warehouse building; and WHEREAS, on April 5, 2022, the Applicant submitted the Application to construct a 270,337 square-foot industrial building on 13.08 acres of land located at 5355 East Airport Drive, within the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district; and WHEREAS, the property abutting the Project site to the north is a Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, and properties beyond are developed with existing industrial land uses within the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district of the Shea Business Center. The property to the south of the Project site (across Airport Drive Street) is zoned IH (Heavy Industrial) and consists of two existing warehouse buildings. The property to the east of the Project site is in the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district and is developed with an industrial gas supplier. The property to the west of the Project site is in the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district and is developed with a Verizon facility; and WHEREAS, the proposed building has been situated on the center of the site, and is set back approximately 180 to 200 feet from Airport Drive, 77 feet from the west property line, 72 feet from the east property line, and 40 feet from the north property line; and
WHEREAS, the building is designed to accommodate up to two tenants, with offices located at the southeast and southwest corners of the building, fronting East Airport Drive. Off-street parking is located all around the building, with the heaviest concentration around the office areas; and
WHEREAS, a truck yard area, with 54 dock-high loading doors, is located on the south side of the building (center of building). The loading area will be screened from street views by portions of the building and 14-foot-tall decorative screen walls with 4189
decorative tube steel gates, that have been designed to match the building architecture; and
WHEREAS, the Project has provided off-street parking pursuant to the "Warehouse and Distribution" parking standards specified in the Development Code. The Project requires and provides 251 passenger vehicle parking spaces. Additionally, the Project requires 14 tractor-trailer parking spaces and has provided 48 tractor-trailer parking spaces; and
WHEREAS, the proposed industrial warehouse building will be of concrete tilt-up construction and designed in a Contemporary Architectural style that exemplifies the type of high-quality architecture promoted by the Ontario Development Code and The Ontario Plan; and
WHEREAS, the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district requires a minimum 10 percent landscape coverage for interior lots, and 12.72 percent will be provided, in compliance with the Ontario Development Code requirements; and WHEREAS, the Application is a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, commencing with Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq. (hereinafter referred to as "CEQA"); and
WHEREAS, the 5355 East Airport Drive Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2022090006) was prepared (hereinafter referred to as "final EIR"), in which development and use of the Project site was discussed; and WHEREAS, the final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations was made available to the public and to all interested agencies for review and comment pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines and the City of Ontario Local CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, Ontario Development Code Table 2.02-1 (Review Matrix) grants the Planning Commission the responsibility and authority to review and act on the subject Application; and
WHEREAS, in response to the Appellants basis for the appeal staff has prepared a response to each of the items. Below is the Appellants statement and staff's response:
Appellant's Issue No. 1: The Final EIR fails to analyze the full scope of the Project, in particular in relation to the Project's reasonably foreseeable use as a parcel hub (a use that generates 2.6 times more trips than analyzed).
Staff Response: This comment is similar to Response to Comment A-6 in the Final EIR, 1-8 in the applicants Response To Comments (RTC) dated May 20, 2024, and CARE-7 in the RTC dated August 8, 2024. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-6 (Final EIR, pp. 2-38, 2-39), RTC 1-8 (RTC, p. 3), and RTC CARE-7 (RTC, p. 3). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding 4190
accuracy and adequacy of the EIR trip generation estimates and all environmental impacts related to or attributable to Project's trip generation. There is no reasonable possibility that the Project, as designed, could operate as a parcel hub.
No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required. Additionally, revised conditions of approval for PDEV22-017 prohibit the primary use of the building being established as a parcel hub.
Appellant's Issue No. 2: The commenter reiterates prior comments that the Final EIR fails to analyze reasonably foreseeable truck trips to the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, which are longer than the trips analyzed in the Final EIR.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1- 16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant's Issue No. 3: The Final EIR fails to include sufficient investigation into energy conservation measures that might be available or appropriate for the Project, as required by the CEQA Guidelines.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-20 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-17, CARE-18, and CARE-21 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC 1- 20 (RTC, pp. 8 to 10, and RTC CARE-17, CARE-18, and CARE-21 (RTC, p. 6).
The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant's Issue No. 4: The Final EIR's analysis of cumulative air quality impacts is inadequate because it fails to consider the Project's impacts in the context of the numerous other warehouses existing and planned in the area.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-14 in the Final EIR, 1-10 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 in the RTC dated August
8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-14 (Final EIR, pp. 2-41, 2-42), RTC Comment 1-8 (RTC, p. 4, 5), and RTC CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 (RTC, pp. 3 to 4). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of air quality impacts including analysis of cumulative air quality impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant's Issue No. 5: The Final EIR's quantified health risk analysis underestimates impacts because it analyzed trucks travelling only east along 4191
Airport Drive, not accounting for building downwash and relying on unreliable input values.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-12, 1-13, 1-41 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-13, CARE-27, and CARE-28 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC 1-12, 1-13, and 1-41 (RTC, pp. 5, 14 to 16), and RTC CARE-13, CARE-27, CARE-28 (RTC, pp. 4,7). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of health risk impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections to the EIR are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant's Issue No. 6: The Final EIR identifies significant vapor intrusion impacts due to tetrachloroethylene (PCE) contamination, but improperly defers formulation of mitigation measures.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC CARE-4, CARE-5, and CARE-6 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC CARE-4, CARE-5, and CARE-6 (RTC, pp. 2, 3). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of vapor intrusion impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections to the EIR are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 7: The Final EIR is deficient as a matter of law and its conclusions are not supported by substantial evidence based on the previous comments made.
Staff Response: The commenter asserts that the Planning Commission's approval decision must be vacated, and the EIR must be revised and recirculated in compliance with CEQA. Contrary to the commenter's assertion, this memorandum, RTCs (dated May 20 and August 8), and Final EIR demonstrates that the Project's impacts have been adequately analyzed and mitigated. Thus, no additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary.
Appellant Issue No. 8: The commenter cites to Section 4.02.025(D) of the City's Municipal Code and assets that the Project would have significant and unavoidable VMT impact, potential health risk, air quality, GHG, energy, and soil contamination impacts that have been underestimated.
Staff Response: The commenter asserts that the City cannot make the requisite findings to approve the Project and a revised EIR must be recirculated before the Project can be recommended for approval. Contrary to the commenter's assertion, this memorandum, prior RTCs (dated May 20 and August 8), and Final EIR demonstrates that the Project's impacts have been adequately analyzed and mitigated as feasible. Thus, no additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary.
Appellant Issue No. 9: The commenter provides previously submitted comment letters as Attachments A through D to the appeal letter. 4192
Staff Response: Attachment A includes a comment letter dated October 5, 2023, which has been responded to in the Project's Final EIR. Attachment B includes a comment letter dated April 15, 2024, which has been response to in the RTC dated May 20, 2024. Attachment C is a comment letter dated May 28, 2024, which has been responded to in the RTC dated August 8, 2024. Response to Attachment D is provided below in RTC CARECA-13 to CARECA-33 in the applicant's response.
Appellant Issue No. 10: This comment consists of introductory remarks, identifies that the comments in this letter are being provided by Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo on behalf of CARECA, and provides a summary of prior comments submitted concerning the Project during the Draft's EIR public review period, and on the Final EIR.
Staff Response: The commenter claims that the RTC, dated August 8, 2024, failed to resolve asserted flaws that CARE CA and its experts identified in the Draft EIR and that the Planning Commission should require the City to revised and recirculate the EIR before any further action is taken on the Project. Response to the comments made in this letter are provided below in the following issues and responses below. Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 11: The commenter reiterates previous comments about the conclusions of the Project's Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA; Technical Appendix G to the Draft EIR) regarding ethylbenzene concentration and opines the Final EIR improperly defers formulation of mitigation for PCE and ethylbenzene contamination.
Staff Response: Refer to responses above and RTC CARE-4, CARE-5, and CARE-6 in the RTC dated August 8, 2024. Refer to RTC CARE-4, CARE-5, and CARE-6 (RTC, pp. 2, 3). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of vapor intrusion impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections to the EIR are necessary and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 12: The commenter reiterates previous comments regarding the Project's potential as a High Cube Parcel Hub Warehouse and that trip generated by the Project are not adequately analyzed.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-6 in the Final EIR, 1-8 in the RTC dated May 20, 2024, and CARE-7 in the RTC dated August 8, 2024. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-6 (Final EIR, pp. 2-38, 2-39), RTC 1-8 (RTC, p. 3), and RTC CARE-7 (RTC, p. 3). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR trip generation estimates and all environmental impacts related to or attributable to Project's trip generation. There is no reasonable possibility that the Project, as designed, could operate as a parcel hub. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required. Additionally, as previously noted, revised 4193
conditions of approval for PDEV22-017 prohibit the primary use of the building being established as a parcel hub.
Appellant Issue No. 13: The commenter reiterates previous comments that the Final EIR's analysis of cumulative impacts is inadequate because it fails to consider the cumulative impacts of past, present, and probable future projects.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-14 in the Final EIR, 1-10 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 in the RTC dated August
8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-14 (Final EIR, pp. 2-41, 2-42), RTC 1-8 (RTC, p. 4, 5), and RTC CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 (RTC, pp. 3 to 4). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of air quality impacts including analysis of cumulative air quality impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 14: The commenter reiterates previous comments that the Project's Health Risk Assessment underestimates health risk impacts on sensitive receptors and failed to account for building downwash and relied on unreliable input values.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-12, 1-13, 1-41 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-13, CARE-27, and CARE-28 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC 1-12, 1-13, and 1-41 (RTC, pp. 5, 14 to 16), and RTC CARE-13, CARE-27, CARE-28 (RTC, pp. 4,7). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of health risk impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections to the EIR are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 15: The commenter reiterates previous comments that Final EIR truck trip length is underestimated.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1-16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 16: The commenter reiterates previous comments that the Project's energy analysis remains inadequate.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-20 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-17, CARE-18, and CARE-21 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to RTC 1- 4194
20 (RTC, pp. 8 to 10, and RTC CARE-17, CARE-18, and CARE-21 (RTC, p. 6).
The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 17: The commenter asserts that the Project's Media Management Plan (Attachment F to the Final EIR) was never attached to the Final EIR that is posted at the City of Ontario's website.
Staff Response: The City thanks the commenter for calling this to the City's attention and the City immediately posted the Media Management Plan to the website. All appendices to the Final EIR are posted on the City's website.
Additionally, the Media Management Plan was provided in all agenda packages and staff reports for the Project's Development Advisory Board and Planning Commission hearings. The commenter also summarizes the procedures in the Media Management Plan in the event that an unanticipated subsurface structure is discovered and states a site-specific remedial action work (RAW) plan should be initiated to protect workers onsite. The Media Management Plan's implementation is sufficient for ensuring that potential environmental effects are reduced to below a level of significance. Refer to Section 4.3 of the Media Management Plan, which requires adherence to a Health and Safety Plan (HASP) including for construction workers. The HASP will detail all planned construction activities and will describe standard safety precautions (e.g., protective gear for workers, proper soil handling techniques, etc.). The Contractor or the Environmental Professional is responsible for ensuring that the safety precautions detailed in the HASP are implemented and monitored during all activities at the site. The Contractor and the Environmental Professional also are required to abide by all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and codes relating to health and safety and are required by law to adhere to all California Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations contained in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations (8 CCR), as they apply to activities at the Project site. Additionally, revised conditions of approval for PDEV22-017 require the preparation and implementation of a remedial action work (RAW) plan for construction workers, for the potential of encountering hazardous materials.
Appellant Issue No. 18: The commenter reiterates previous comments that Final EIR truck trip length is underestimated and that the "Warehousing and Distribution Center Facilities in Southern California: The Use of the Commodity Flow Survey Data to Identify Logistics Sprawl and Freight Generation Patterns" by the National Center for Sustainable Transportation (NCST) validates that the majority of facilities in the SCAG region receive goods from the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1-16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). Specifically, refer to RTC CARE-16 regarding the low sample size of the study and that the study is not an accurate representation of 4195
warehouse facilities in the region. The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 19: The commenter reiterates previous comments the use of a diesel generator was not accounted for in the Project's air quality analysis and that diesel generators are a source of diesel particulate matter (DPM), which is a primary toxic air contaminant (TAC) associated with the Project.
Staff Response: Refer to RTC A-10 in the Final EIR (Final EIR, pp. 2-40 to 2-41) that addresses the use of diesel generator, and which provided a table of calculations of emissions that would be generated from a 197 horsepower (hp) diesel-powered emergency water pump and a 762 hp diesel-powered emergency backup generator. As shown, emissions would be negligible, and the Project's total emissions would be less than the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) significance threshold. Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 20: The commenter reiterates previous comments that the health risk impacts to the San Bernardino County West Valley Detention Center (WVDC) was not analyzed.
Staff Response: Refer to RTC CARE-31 in the RTC dated August 4 (RTC, p. 8).
Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 21: The commenter reiterates previous comments regarding the Project's cumulative impacts analysis.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-14 in the Final EIR, 1-10 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 in the RTC dated August
8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-14 (Final EIR, pp. 2-41, 2-42), RTC 1-8 (RTC, p. 4, 5), and RTC CARE-9, CARE-10, and CARE-11 (RTC, pp. 3 to 4). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of air quality impacts including analysis of cumulative air quality impacts. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 22: The commenter reiterates previous comments related to building downwash.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC 1-12 in the RTC dated May 20.
Refer to RTC Comment 1-12 in the RTC (RTC, p. 5) for a full discussion on the reasoning why the Project would not be materially affected by downwash. Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 23: The comment consists of introductory remarks from Smart Mobility and summarizes the findings of the commenter's letter in October 2023, stating that the Draft EIR acknowledges a significant and unavoidable VMT impact, 4196
asserting that the proposed VMT mitigation measure is not fully specified or quantified, and claiming that the Project's trip generation and GHG emissions could be much higher than assumed.
Staff Response: As described in the following responses, the commenter's assertions are incorrect. Refer to the comments below. Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 24: The commenter reiterates previous comments and responses made regarding the Project's truck trip length.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1- 16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 25: The commenter reiterates previous comments and responses made regarding the Project's significant and unavoidable VMT impacts.
Staff Response: The commenter's statements have been previously addressed at Final EIR RTC A-24, which included a calculation of feasible VMT mitigation measures. As stated, measures associated with commute trip reduction (CTR) programs and their related commute trip reduction strategies have been excluded as they are not quantifiable, nor can their implementation be guaranteed and enforced since the Project is proposed to be developed as a speculative building without a known tenant (Final EIR pp. 2-44 to 2-45). Additionally, the commenter reiterated suggestions on requiring zero emission trucks, limiting daily number of trucks allowed at the Project site, and providing electric vehicle (EV) charging stations and electrical hookups for truckers. Refer to RTC B-53 and B-60 in the Final EIR (Final EIR, pp. 2-97 to 2-100) regarding the infeasibility of using zeroemission vehicles and EV charging stations for trucks and 1-33 in the RTC dated May 20 (RTC, p. 13) for limiting daily number of trucks allowed at the Project site.
Thus, no further response is required.
Appellant Issue No. 26: The commenter reiterates previous comments and responses made related to the Project's trip generation assumptions.
Staff Response: This comment is similar to RTC A-18, A-19, and A-28 in the Final EIR, 1- 16 in the RTC dated May 20, CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 in the RTC dated August 8. Refer to Final EIR RTC A-18, A-19, A-28 (Final EIR, pp. 2- 43, 2-44, 2-45) and RTC 1-16 (RTC, p. 7), and RTC CARE-14, CARE-15, and CARE-16 (RTC, p. 5). The commenter raises no new or additional environmental issues not previously addressed in the Draft EIR, Final EIR, RTC, and the Responses provided herein, and the whole record before the City. The City maintains its position regarding accuracy and adequacy of the EIR analysis of the 4197
Project's truck trips assumptions. No additions, revisions, or corrections are necessary, and no further response is required.
WHEREAS, the Project has been reviewed for consistency with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan component of The Ontario Plan, as State Housing Element law (as prescribed in Government Code Sections 65580 through 65589.8) requires that development projects must be consistent with the Housing Element, if upon consideration of all its aspects, it is found to further the purposes, principals, goals, and policies of the Housing Element; and
WHEREAS, the Project is located within the Airport Influence Area of Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and is subject to, and must be consistent with, the policies and criteria set forth in the Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (hereinafter referred to as "ALUCP"), which applies only to jurisdictions within San Bernardino County, and addresses the noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity; and
WHEREAS, City of Ontario Development Code Division 2.03 (Public Hearings) prescribes the manner in which public notification shall be provided and hearing procedures to be followed, and all such notifications and procedures have been completed; and
WHEREAS, Ontario Development Code Table 2.02-1 (Review Matrix) grants the City Council the responsibility and authority to review and act on the subject appeal Application; and
WHEREAS, on March 18, 2024, the Development Advisory Board (DAB) conducted a hearing regarding the subject Application and voted to continue the Project to the next available DAB meeting to allow staff to work with the applicant to revise draft conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2024, the DAB conducted a hearing to consider the final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Ontario Local CEQA Guidelines, and concluded said hearing on that date, voting to issue Decision No. DAB24-010, recommending that the Planning Commission approve the final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
WHEREAS, on April 15, 2024, the DAB conducted a hearing regarding the subject Application and concluded said hearing on that date, voting to issue Decision No. DAB24- 011, recommending the Planning Commission approve the Project, subject to the conditions of approval appended to the attached Resolution; and WHEREAS, as the first action on the Project, on May 28, 2024, the Planning Commission conducted a hearing to consider for the final EIR, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, each prepared 4198
pursuant to CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Ontario Local CEQA Guidelines, and continued the Project for further consideration; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the Development Plan (File No. PDEV22-017), and continued the Project for further consideration; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2024, the Planning Commission of the City of Ontario conducted a hearing to consider the Development Plan (File No. PDEV22-017), and concluded said hearing on that date voting to issue Resolution No. PC24-037, to approve the Application by a vote of 5-0; and
WHEREAS, on September 5, 2024, Aidan Marshall ("Appellant") from Adams Broadwell Joseph & Cardozo, representing CARECA, submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve File No. PDEV22-017. The basis of the Appellant's appeal lies in their belief that the Planning Commission's approval of the Project and certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and land use laws because the City has not complied with its duty to disclose and mitigate the Project's potentially significant environmental and land use impacts, and the Planning Commission's approval findings were not supported by substantial evidence.
WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, the City Council of the City of Ontario conducted a public hearing to consider an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve the project, and concluded said hearing on that date; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY FOUND, DETERMINED, AND RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Ontario, as follows:
SECTION 1: Housing Element Compliance. Pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code Chapter 3, Article 10.6, commencing with Section 65580, as the decision-making authority for the Project, the City Council finds that based upon the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation, at the time of Project implementation, the project is consistent with the Housing Element of the Policy Plan (General Plan) component of The Ontario Plan, as the project site is not one of the properties in the Housing Element Sites Inventory contained in Tables B-1 and B2 of the Housing Element Technical Report.
SECTION 2: Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ("ALUCP") Compliance.
The California State Aeronautics Act (Public Utilities Code Section 21670 et seq.) requires that an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan be prepared for all public use airports in the State; and requires that local land use plans and individual development proposals must be consistent with the policies set forth in the adopted Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan.
4199
(1) On April 19, 2011, the City Council of the City of Ontario approved and adopted the Ontario International Airport Land use Compatibility Plan, establishing the Airport Influence Area for Ontario International Airport, which encompasses lands within parts of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Los Angeles Counties, and limits future land uses and development within the Airport Influence Area, as they relate to noise, safety, airspace protection, and overflight impacts of current and future airport activity. As the decision-making authority for the Project, the City Council has reviewed and considered the facts and information contained in the Application and supporting documentation against the ONT ALUCP compatibility factors, including [1] Safety Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-2) and Safety Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-2), [2] Noise Criteria (ONT ALUCP Table 2-3) and Noise Impact Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-3), [3] Airspace protection Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-4), and [4] Overflight Notification Zones (ONT ALUCP Map 2-5). As a result, the City Council, therefore, finds and determines that the Project, when implemented in conjunction with the conditions of approval, will be consistent with the policies and criteria set forth within the ONT ALUCP; and
SECTION 3: Concluding Facts and Reasons. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the City Council during the above-referenced hearing, and upon the specific findings set forth in Sections 1 and 2, above, the City Council hereby concludes as follows:
(1) The proposed development at the proposed location is consistent with the goals, policies, plans and exhibits of the Vision, Policy Plan (General Plan), and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan. The proposed Project is located within the Industrial land use district of the Policy Plan Land Use Map, and the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district. The development standards and conditions under which the proposed Project will be constructed and maintained, is consistent with the goals, policies, plans, and exhibits of the Vision, Policy Plan (General Plan), and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, policies, plans, and exhibits of the Vision, Policy Plan (General Plan), and City Council Priorities components of The Ontario Plan, as the Project will contribute to the establishment of a dynamic, progressive city containing distinct neighborhoods and districts that foster a positive sense of identity and belonging among residents, visitors, and businesses (Goal CD1). Furthermore, the Project will promote the City's policy to take actions that are consistent with the City being a leading urban center in Southern California, while recognizing the diverse character of our existing viable neighborhoods (Policy CD1-1); and (2) The proposed development is compatible with those on adjoining sites in relation to location of buildings, with particular attention to privacy, views, any physical constraint identified on the site and the characteristics of the area in which the site is located. The Project has been designed consistent with the requirements of the City of Ontario 4200
Development Code and the IH (Heavy Industrial) zoning district, including standards relative to the particular land use proposed (270,337 square foot industrial warehouse), as-well-as building intensity, building and parking setbacks, building height, number of off-street parking and loading spaces, on-site and off-site landscaping, and fences, walls and obstructions; and (3) The proposed development will complement and/or improve upon the quality of existing development in the vicinity of the project and the minimum safeguards necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare have been required of the proposed project. The City Council has required certain safeguards, and impose certain conditions of approval, which have been established to ensure that: [i] the purposes of the Development Code are maintained; [ii] the Project will not endanger the public health, safety or general welfare; [iii] the Project will not result in any significant environmental impacts; [iv] the Project will be in harmony with the area in which it is located; and [v] the Project will be in full conformity with the Vision, City Council Priorities and Policy Plan components of The Ontario Plan; and
(4) The proposed development is consistent with the development standards and design guidelines set forth in the Development Code, or applicable specific plan or planned unit development. The proposed Project has been reviewed for consistency with the general development standards and guidelines of the Development Code that are applicable to the proposed Project, including building intensity, building and parking setbacks, building height, amount of off-street parking and loading spaces, parking lot dimensions, design and landscaping, bicycle parking, on-site landscaping, and fences and walls, as-well-as those development standards and guidelines specifically related to the particular land use being proposed (industrial warehouse with a 0.47 FAR). As a result of this review, the City Council has determined that the Project, when implemented in conjunction with the conditions of approval, will be consistent with the development standards and guidelines described in the Development Code.
SECTION 4: City Council Action. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Sections 1 through 3, above, the City Council hereby APPROVES the herein described Application, subject to each and every condition set forth in the Department reports attached hereto as "Attachment A," and incorporated herein by this reference.
SECTION 5: Indemnification. The Applicant shall agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City of Ontario or its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of Ontario or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul this approval. The City of Ontario shall promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceeding, and the City of Ontario shall cooperate fully in the defense.
4201
SECTION 6: Custodian of Records. The documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings have been based are located at the City of Ontario City Hall, 303 East "B" Street, Ontario, California 91764. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City of Ontario.
SECTION 7: Certification to Adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Ontario shall certify as to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 2024. _____________________________________
PAUL S. LEON, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________________
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
CITY ATTORNEY
4202
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
CITY OF ONTARIO )
I, SHEILA MAUTZ, City Clerk of the City of Ontario, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that foregoing Resolution No. 2024- was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Ontario at their regular meeting held November 19, 2024 by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
The foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 2024- duly passed and adopted by the Ontario City Council at their regular meeting held November 19, 2024. _____________________________________
SHEILA MAUTZ, CITY CLERK
(SEAL)
4203
ATTACHMENT A:
File No. PDEV22-017
Departmental Conditions of Approval
(Departmental conditions of approval to follow this page) 4204