Orange City Council
May 26, 2026

SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This tree survey has been performed at the request of Melia Homes for a proposed 4.1-acre site in the City of Orange, California, within the County of Orange. The site is completely developed with a vacant retail building and an adjacent parking lot with associated landscaping.

The field survey associated with this report was performed on June 12, 2025. The subject trees were tagged with aluminum tags, each containing a unique number. As part of this survey, details of each tree were recorded documenting their species, stature, health, local environment as well as conditions in which they occur. In all, 86 trees were assessed onsite involving four distinct species. The most common species observed was Brisbane box (Lophostemon confertus), comprising 44.2% of all species within the project area.

Due to disease, poor structural integrity, or other signs of distress, eight (9.3%) of the trees onsite are recommended for removal. The remaining 78 trees are viable specimens, but a few of them are marginal and require treatment (strategic pruning, insecticide/fungicide application, etc.) to mitigate defects and facilitate safety if retained. In addition, one dead tree was noted as well. No trees within the property were noted as native. Several trees within the property were found to serve the local community. To address this, the proposed project retains 13 of the date palms (#573-84) lining the entrance of the property, preserving them within the new site plan (see Figure 2 below).

The Municipal Code outlines provisions and guidelines for tree removal, installation, preservation, as well as maintenance within the City. All trees that are intended for removal as part of a project require a permit (prior to removal) and must be approved by the Planning Director. The Director must approve final mitigation (See Section 2.6.3 below) involving all replacement tree species, location, and size. 661
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

SECTION 2: BACKGROUND

2.1 - Project Location and Description
The 4.1-acre site is located at 2375 N Tustin St. Orange, California, within the County of Orange (see Figure 1 below). Specifically, the site resides between Tustin St. and the 55 Freeway; it is

0.3-mile north of the Meats Ave. offramp. The proposed project involves the development of a residential property with associated infrastructure dwellings, landscaping and parking. 662
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

2.2 - Site and Vicinity Characteristics

2.2.1 - Natural Surroundings
The elevation of the site is approximately 280 feet AMSL1,and it is relatively flat. The geological basement rock is described as unconsolidated to moderately consolidated silt and alluvial fan sand deposits from the Holocene to late Pleistocene (.0117 mya-present) periods 2 .

As indicated in Table 1 below, one distinct soil series occurs within the site boundary. This soil series’ parent material is described by the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) as alluvium derived from sedimentary rock.

Table 1. Soils on Site
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in
AOI
Percent of
AOI
Sorrento clay loam, 2 to 9 percent
slopes
NRCS Map Unit 209
Typical profile
• Ap1 - 0 to 6 inches: clay loam
• Ap2 - 6 to 12 inches: clay loam
• AB1 - 12 to 21 inches: silty clay loam
• AB2 - 21 to 27 inches: silty clay loam
• AB3 - 27 to 37 inches: silty clay loam
• Bk1 - 37 to 49 inches: silty clay loam
• Bk2 - 49 to 62 inches: silty clay loam
• 2C - 62 to 72 inches: stratified loamy fine sand to silt loam Properties and qualities
• Slope: 2 to 9 percent
• Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
• Drainage class: Well drained
• Runoff class: Medium

4.1 100.0%
Totals for Area of Interest 4.1 100.0%

2.2.2 - Vegetation Community
The local vicinity is within Sunset Zone 24 and USDA Hardiness Zone 10b. The project area is completely developed with a building and associated landscaping that includes ornamental trees and plants.

2.3 - Assignment and Scope of Survey
CalPacific Sciences (CPS) was assigned to perform a tree survey and health assessment of all mature trees within the project area (see Section 2.4 below). The primary goal of the study was to accumulate information on the trees potentially impacted by the proposed development so significant adverse impacts 1 AMSL – above mean sea level
2 ROCKD, 2025 – See Reference Section below
663
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

could be avoided or addressed. A limited health assessment was performed, cataloging the health and stature parameters of each tree onsite. This effort included, but was not limited to; recording total diameter at breast height (DBH), canopy spread, tree height, apparent disease/decay, other signs of potential hazard, and pest damage. A limited (visual only) risk assessment was also conducted keeping public safety in mind.

All documentation in this report is in compliance with standards and requirements published by the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA). This report includes recommendations and mitigation measures meant to satisfy all applicable ordinances and permit guidelines.

2.4 - Survey Method and Health Assessment
Prior to the field survey, the City of Orange’s website was accessed to review specific tree protection guidelines. An aerial photograph was used as a visual guide during the assessment.

A handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) device (Garmin GPSMAP 66sr) and a GPS-enabled smartphone (with digitized project boundaries) were used to identify the location of each subject tree; these data were exported into GIS for periodic illustration and presentation over aerial photographs. Unless otherwise dictated by the Municipal Code, trees with a DBH of > 4.5 inches were included in this assessment. The crown-width was measured using a Bosch laser device or estimated by pacing, and the height of each subject tree was visually estimated using a tangent height gauge. These data were recorded on field sheets, and associated aluminum numeric tags were affixed to trees on the north side (or where highly visible) at approximately 4.5 feet above grade for later reference. Aerial views (if present) were captured using a DJI Mavic Air 3. Tree status (relative condition, stature, and health) was conducted by ISA certified and ASCA registered consulting arborist/biologist, George Wirtes from ground level with the aid of binoculars.

As indicated earlier, no invasive procedures were performed. Visual characteristics were recorded, and twig/leaf samples as well as digital photographs were taken as needed to assure accurate identification.

Overall health and general appearance of each tree was numerically rated (Health/General Appearance Rating - 1-Good, 2-Fair, 3-Poor, 4-Decline/dead) based on the conditions. Tree stature was also assessed in relation to the tree species shape (lean, scaffolding, offset canopy mass, etc.) with the rating as follows:
1-Good, 2-Fair, 3-Poor, 4-hazardous. Other conditions were also considered such as fence lines, utilities, competing canopies, grade cuts/slope, etc.

2.5 - Tree Risk Assessment
The International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) recommends a Risk Assessment be included with arborist reports. Such an assessment is an important component of any report and is critical if trees are to be located near public areas such as parks, walkways, residences, and buildings. This tree assessment includes a Level 1 Limited Visual Risk Assessment (as defined by ISA Best Management Practices) unless otherwise stated. No invasive techniques were employed unless otherwise stated. Given the number of trees involved as well as the narrow scope of the tree survey, only obvious and readily viewable signs of defects were assessed; these typically include:
664
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

• Dead or broken structures
• Cracks
• Weakly attached branches and co-dominant stems
• Missing or decayed wood
• Unusual tree architecture or distribution
• Obvious loss of root support
In this report, a risk rating is assigned to each tree based on its defects, apparent health, location and current exposure to nearby targets. A target is a person or property that may sustain potential injury or property damage if a tree or a portion of a tree fails. Target areas typically include sidewalks, walkways, roads, vehicles, structures, playgrounds, or any other area where people are likely to gather. Common conditions that elevate risk of tree failure include dead and diseased trees, cracks, dead branches including bark, stubs from topping cuts, broken branches (hangers), multiple leaders, tight-angled or weakly attached crotches, poor tree structure (i.e. unbalanced crown, lean, poor flare development, etc.).

It is impossible to maintain a tree free of risk. A tree is considered hazardous when it has a structural defect that predisposes it to failure, and it is located near a target, and the consequences are significant.

In this context, risk refers to Likelihood of Failure. As defined by ISA the ratings are defined below*:

1. Improbable – The tree or part of the tree is not likely to fail during normal weather conditions and may not fail during extreme weather conditions within a specified period of time.

2. Possible – Failure may be expected in extreme weather conditions, but it is unlikely during normal weather conditions during the specified period of time.

3. Probable – Failure may be expected under normal weather conditions within the specified period of time.

4. Imminent – Failure has started or is most likely to occur in the near future, even if there is no significant wind or increased load. The imminent category overrides the time frame. * The time frame relative to this report is one year.

2.6 - Local Tree Regulation (City of Orange Municipal Code Chapter 12.32) The City’s Municipal Code (Code) outlines several provisions relative to development and the protection of its tree resources. Key provisions within the Code are outlined below. This list is not all inclusive and further reading of the Code is recommended.

2.6.1 - Street Trees (Chapter 12.28.020)
No person shall plant, or remove, any tree or shrub, stakes or tree guards in, or upon, any public street or right-of-way, without having first obtained a permit.
• Every person planting or arranging for the planting of street trees shall obtain a permit required by this chapter from the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and perform the work in accordance with the specifications prepared by the Public Works Director/City Engineer; 665
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

• Every person removing or arranging for the removal of a street tree shall obtain a permit required by this chapter from the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and perform the work in accordance with the specifications prepared by the Public Works Director/City Engineer.

2.6.2 - Tree Removal Permit (Chapter 12.32)
The City of Orange states in their Municipal Code that, it is illegal for any individual or entity, including firms, partnerships, corporations, or other legal structures, to remove or destroy any tree from undeveloped or public interest property without first obtaining a permit. These terms, "tree," "undeveloped property," and "public interest property," are specifically defined within the Code.

2.7 - Limitations and Exceptions of Assessment
This survey was conducted in a manner that draws upon past education, acquired knowledge, training, experience, and research. It was conducted to the greatest extent feasible, and although the information gathered reduces risk of tree failure/decline, it does not fully remove it. The scope of the survey was to assess the trees within the project site to gather information relative to their quantity, species, and health. Given the scope and the number of trees involved, a limited tree risk assessment was conducted, providing an initial evaluation of the tree's condition (see Section 2.5 above). This assessment does not encompass the comprehensive techniques required to detect internal decay, assess root crown health, or thoroughly address potential failure risks. For a complete and accurate understanding of the tree's health and structural integrity, a more detailed risk assessment is recommended. This higher-level assessment should involve advanced techniques to evaluate internal decay, root crown health, and other critical factors. Tree failure may still occur for a number of reasons and can only be adequately addressed on a tree-by-tree basis that involves higher level risk assessment. No tree pruning, treatment, or maintenance was performed as part of this assessment.

The authority of this report ceases at any stated time limit within it, after one year from the date of the survey (if none stated), when any site conditions change, or after pruning (or other activity) not specified in this report.

Trees mostly flower and fruit in the spring and fall months revealing characteristics that aid in their identification. Trees may not exhibit such features due to factors related to their health, vigor, reproduction strategy, etc. There is a potential (albeit small) for a tree species to be misidentified.

Drawing clues from the leaves (shape and position), bark, tree morphology, and any other structures (inflorescence, fruit, etc.), every effort was made to provide a conclusive species name to the greatest degree possible.

No invasive diagnostic testing was performed during this assessment. The survey associated with this Arborist Report was visual only in nature and did not include soil sampling, root excavation, 666
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

trunk coring/drilling or any other invasive procedure. The determinations of damage due to pest infestation and decay were made solely on outward appearance and inspection of the tree structures. Not all tree defects may be readily visible from the ground or apparent at the time of the survey, especially during rain events when the wood is wet. Epiphytic growth can also obscure defects on the stem and in the canopy of a tree.

Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree.

Internal or heartwood decay can be present and significant while showing little outward indication of wood rot internally. Trees are living organisms subject to attack by disease, insects, fungi and other forces of nature. Many aspects of tree health and environmental conditions are often not detectable (internal decay, poor root anchoring, etc.).

The statements made in this report do not consider the effects of climate/wind extremes, vandalism, or accidents (whether physical, chemical, or fire). In addition, this area is known to have periodic, high velocity Santa Ana winds from transient high-pressure ridges. CPSC cannot, therefore, accept any liability in connection with these factors, or where prescribed work is not carried out in a correct and professional manner in accordance with current ISA good practice.

As described in the Survey Methodology in Section 2.4 above, tree location was recorded using a Garmin GPSMAP 66sr; this device is known to have an error of up to 3m. In addition, the data were overlain on an aerial map using GIS, and a parcel map was projected to estimate tree locations relative to property boundaries.

The conclusions contained herein rely on documentation readily available (see Section 6 below) and further review of local law and communication with the City’s planning department are recommended. In addition, consulting arborists are not risk managers nor responsible for tree removal or preservation. They make recommendations based on several factors, including (but not limited to) tree health and public safety. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations contained within this report; or seek additional advice. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be safe under any circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Only proper maintenance according to ISA Standards can reduce the risk of failure. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk is to remove all trees onsite. 667
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

SECTION 3: SUBJECT TREES AND OBSERVATIONS
As previously indicated, specific measurements, observations, and parameters of all mature trees onsite were recorded on tree assessment worksheets at the time of the survey; these data have been transferred into the table in Appendix A at the end of this document. Figure 2 below shows the location of each tree within the property and any notable conditions observed are provided in the following plates below. Table 2 provides a species profile for the individual types of trees found within the property. 668
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

669
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

Table 2. Species Profiles
African Sumac
Searsia lancea
The African Sumac is a dense shade tree belonging to the cashew family, Anacardiaceae. Known for its resilience in dry conditions, it thrives with minimal water but maintains its best appearance when provided with regular, deep irrigation. Adapted to Sunset Climate Zones 8–9 and 12–24, this tree does not tolerate shade and flourishes in USDA Hardiness Zones 9, 10, and 11. It can grow in various soil textures, including loam, sand, and clay, and is tolerant of pH levels ranging from slightly acidic to very alkaline. With a moderate tolerance to salt, the African Sumac reaches a maximum height of 30 feet, with a canopy spread between 20 and 35 feet. It grows at an approximate rate of 24 inches per year, has medium-strength branches, and presents a low potential for root damage. There are no known hazards associated with this tree, and its biogenic emissions are low. Additionally, it attracts birds, enhancing local wildlife interactions. While generally hardy, it is susceptible to diseases such as root rot and verticillium.
9 Brisbane Box
Lophostemon confertus
This species is drought resistant, and once established, is smog tolerant. This Native of Australia from the Myrtaceae (myrtle) family; it can be a larger tree in warmer areas. It grows erect or spreading and requires ample growing space with a rounded Shape when mature. It has Evergreen foliage.

It typically attains a height of 30 - 50 feet with a width 10 - 30 feet. It grows approximately 24 to 36 inches per year with a Longevity 50 to 150 years. This tree or shrub has a shading capacity rated as, dense in leaf and its litter issue is dry fruit. It grows in Sunset Zones 15 - 17 and 19 - 24; H1, H2 and USDA Hardiness Zones 10 - 11. It tolerates exposure from full sun to partial shade.

It is typically planted in moist to dry soil composed of clay, loam or sand texture with slightly acidic to highly alkaline soil pH. This species is susceptible to scales, Phytophthora and root rot. Its branch strength rated as medium and its root damage potential rated as moderate.
38 Date Palm
Phoenix dactylifera
With origins from the middle east, northern Africa, and southern Asia; this tree is a source of edible dates having many cultivars. It is a member of the palm family, Areacaceae, and it needs high temperatures to fruit. Its SelecTree water use rating is low. It thrives in sunset zones 8 - 9, 11 – 24. It prefers sun exposure of partial shade to full sun with a soil texture of loam or sand with a soil pH that is slightly acidic to very alkaline. Its maximum tree height is 100 feet with a canopy width of 20-40 feet. Its growth rate is approximately 12-36 in/year. Its branch strength is strong, and its root damage potential is moderate. This tree is susceptible to Texas root rot.
24 Southern Magnolia
Magnolia grandiflora
This tree is a member of the Magnoliaceae (magnolia) family, is a medium to large evergreen tree known for its fragrant flowers. This species is native to the Southeastern United States, specifically endemic to the lowland subtropical forests of the Gulf and South Atlantic coastal plain. It thrives in full sun to partial shade and prefers moist soil with a loam or sand texture, tolerating a pH range from very acidic to slightly alkaline. With a high water use rating, it can reach a height of 60 to 80 feet and a width of 50 to 60 feet, exhibiting a growth rate of about 24 inches per year. These resilient trees boast a longevity of over 150 years and show moderate salt tolerance. They are suitable for Sunset Zones 4 - 12, 14 - 24, H1, H2, and USDA Hardiness Zones 7 - 9. While generally robust, they can be susceptible to issues like Armillaria, Root Rot, Verticillium, Invasive Shot Hole Borer, Aphids, Scales, and Spider Mites. Its branch strength is rated as medium, and it has a high potential for root damage.
15 * California native tree species
** Cal-IPC (California Invasive Plant Council) invasive tree species Source: UFEI, 2024. Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute
670
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

3.1 - Observations
Plate 1. This is a view of a tree planted in close
proximity to a block wall (#502).

Plate 2. This is a view of a tree canopy with the
potential of interfering with nearby electrical lines
(#504).

Plate 3. This is a view of a failed branch suggesting a potential of future failure elsewhere in the tree
(#511).

Plate 4. This is a view of an embedded tree tie within
the tissue of the tree (#524).
671
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

Plate 5. This is a view of upper canopy deadwood
or retrenchment (#532).

Plate 6. This is a view of the site of a flush cut
pruning (#534).

Plate 7. This is a view of a longitudinal stem split
that presents an immediate hazard of a limb failure
(#563).

Plate 8. This is a view of exudation or staining within the lower stem of a tree (#565).
672
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

Plate 9. This is a view of tissue decay beneath a
branch collar (#566).

Plate 10. This is a view of included bark at the
union of two stems (#727).

3.1.1 - Urban Forest
California is a very unique setting having its own floristic province while supporting a robust population of endemic floral species. Typically, the term urban forest refers to all trees within a densely populated area; this includes trees within cities located in parks, streetways, easements, private property etc. within a community or urban forest. In this capacity, trees provide many benefits, as they help to reduce air and water pollution, alter heating and cooling costs, reduce storm runoff, increase real estate values, provide habitat for plants and animals, and increase the quality of life for the community.

The project site is a very small component of the urban forest that makes up the interior community in Southern California. Implementing trees of various size, shape, and species serve many vital functions to the community as well as the wildlife, contributing to spatial complexity, species richness as well as species abundance. Many municipalities promote approved tree lists comprised of hardy species that thrive and reduce the threat of failure in harsh environments. Integrating carefully selected native species can also serve the community well and enriches the experience, promoting an environment better suited to the resident avian and butterfly population.

Specific to the project site, the subject trees are fairly diverse in size and stature providing a variation in tree height, shape, and scaffolding. With only four distinct species, the tree population within the site provides decreased diversity given the number of species present. Within the site no tree species were noted as native and no trees considered invasive Cal-IPC (California Invasive Plant Council). The 673
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

average stem diameter, tree height, and canopy cover for the population of 86 trees within the site were

9.4 inches, 34.2 feet, and 497.0 square feet respectively. 674
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

SECTION 4: DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1 - Conclusion
As previously indicated, the site is completely developed with a vacant retail building and an adjacent parking lot with associated landscaping. The field survey associated with this report was performed on June 12, 2025. The subject trees were tagged with aluminum tags, each containing a unique number. As part of this survey, details of each tree were recorded documenting their species, stature, health, local environment as well as conditions in which they occur. In all, 86 trees were assessed onsite, involving four distinct species. The most common species observed was Brisbane box (Lophostemon confertus), comprising

44.2% of all species within the project area.

Due to disease, poor structural integrity, or other signs of distress, eight (9.3%) of the trees onsite are recommended for removal. The remaining 78 trees are viable specimens, but a few of them are marginal and require treatment (strategic pruning, insecticide/fungicide application, etc.) to mitigate defects and facilitate safety if retained. In addition, one dead tree was noted as well. No trees within the property were noted as native. Several trees within the property were found to serve the local community. To address this, the proposed project retains 13 of the date palms (#573-84) lining the entrance of the property, preserving them within the new site plan.

4.2 - Discussion
The project area is the site of a former retail store with associated space for parking. All of the trees within the site are generally well maintained and include all ornamental species. Of potential significance is the stand of date palms that line the entrance of the project area; these palms are earmarked for retention and integration within the new site plan. With exception to these palms, no other trees are preserved according to the site plan. In the event other trees are preserved, recommendations are provided in Appendix A to address structural defects and other health concerns within the stand trees.

4.3 - Recommendations

4.3.1 - Tree Replacement
As indicated above, all trees within the project site (with exception to the 13 palm trees lining the entrance) are earmarked for removal. Removal of living, native and non-native trees may result in a biological impact. Recommended mitigation for tree removal is replanting with like-kind specimens (tree species and ratio to be determined by the Planning Director). Removal of any trees must be preceded by authorization (removal permit) from the City’s Planning Department.

4.3.2 - Trees Preserved
For any trees preserved as part of the project, strategic pruning compliant with ISA standards must be performed to subordinate non-primary, codominant stems, and canopy deadwood should be removed.

Regular maintenance and on-going monitoring are recommended according to ISA standards. 675
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

4.3.3 - Migratory Bird Treaty Act
Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and CDFW Code, removal of any trees, shrubs, or any other potential nesting habitat should be conducted outside the avian nesting season. The nesting season generally extends from early February through August, but can vary slightly from year to year based upon seasonal weather conditions.

4.3.4 - Tree Protection During Construction
To protect any trees that will be preserved within the site as well as those immediately adjacent to the project area, measures must be taken to minimize the effects of construction within the tree protection zone.

Building or grading near trees requires that they are healthy at the start of the project for the stand to recover well. Some older trees have little tolerance for root damage or other stress factors. Younger, more vital trees are more tolerant of changes in their surroundings. However, each change in soil compaction, irrigation, under plantings, and other conditions takes some of an older tree’s strength and vigor and further diminishes its health. The main stresses and risks of construction are:
• Soil compaction
• Lack of water or changes in the site hydrology
• Change of grade in the root zone
• Physical damage to tree roots and structure
• Dumping of potentially toxic construction wastes
• Lack of pest control and other care
• Dust
• Human error
Mature trees take a long time to heal from, or respond to, injury. It could take 10 years for some trees to make a visible improvement in health after construction impacts occur. On the other hand, it could take 10 years for a tree to visibly start declining after cutting roots, compacting the soil, or raising the grade. Below are other recommendations that should be adhered to in order to protect trees onsite and on adjacent properties:
• Dripline fencing must be placed a minimum of 1 foot in radius from the tree per 1 inch of diameter at breast height (for example, 6-inch trunk = 6 feet protection radius/12 feet diameter). • Dripline fencing must be erected so that it is visible and structurally sound enough to deter construction equipment, foot traffic, and the storing of equipment under tree canopies. • Raising or lowering the grade in the root zone of trees can be fatal or ruin the health of trees for years to come. Grade change and soil compaction force out the oxygen and literally press the life out of the soil. A retaining wall can be used to minimize the amount of the root zone that is affected, but it is essential that the footing is not continuous. Gravel and aeration pipes should be placed inside the retaining wall before the fill is placed. Consult with a qualified civil engineer for proper design calculations.
676
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

• Trenching within the protection zone must be avoided wherever possible. Most of the roots are in the top 1 to 2 feet of soil, and trenching can sever a large percentage of roots. • Oil from construction equipment, cement, concrete washout, acid washes, paint, and solvents are toxic to tree roots. Signs should be posted on the fencing around trees notifying contractors of the fines for dumping. Portable latrines that are washed out with strong detergents can damage the fine roots of the trees. Portable latrines should not be placed near trees, nor where frequent and regular foot traffic to them will compact the soil below the trees. • Construction creates large amounts of dust, and the oaks and any other trees to be preserved will need to be kept clean. Dust reduces photosynthesis on all trees. Strict dust control measures must be implemented during construction to minimize this impact, and an occasional rinsing with a solution of water and insecticidal soap will help control pests. 677
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

SECTION 5: QUALIFICATIONS OF ARBORIST
Mr. Wirtes is a Certified Arborist (CH-08084) with the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is a Registered Consulting Arborist (#738) with the American Society of Consulting Arborists. Originally ISA certified in November of 2005, Mr. Wirtes is also Tree Risk Assessment Qualification (TRAQ) certified, and has conducted numerous tree assessments for residential, industrial, and commercial properties involving oak and other tree species. Most notably, Mr. Wirtes has assessed properties with as many as 980 trees, and has created an oak regeneration, desert native plant and Joshua tree management plans. He regularly performs tree surveys within Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange as well as Los Angeles Counties. Mr. Wirtes’ education includes a Bachelor of Science in Biology and a Master of Science in Environmental Science from California State University at Fullerton.

I certify that the details stated herein this report are true and accurate:
________________________________________________
George Wirtes, MS, RCA #738
ISA Certified Arborist, CH-08084
678
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

SECTION 6: REFERENCES
Calflora. 2025. Website at http://www.calflora.org.

Cal-IPC 2025. Website at https://www.cal-ipc.org/plants/inventory/ City of Orange, 2025. Municipal Code posted on website:
https://ecode360.com/43563854
Hickman, J.C. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. University of California Press. Berkeley, California.

Natural Resource Conservation Service. 2025. Website at http://ortho.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/ University of California, 2025. California Tree Failure Report Program website at http://ucanr.edu/sites/treefail/
University of Florida Environmental Horticulture Department 2025. Website at http://hort.ifas.ufl.edu/
UFEI, 2025. Urban Forest Ecosystems Institute website at https://selectree.calpoly.edu/ Virginia Tech, Dendrology Dept. 2025. Website at
http://www.cnr.vt.edu/DENDRO/dendrology/main.htm
679
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

Appendix A - Tree Species Matrix
Note - This tree survey and the details recorded below are meant to characterize the trees within the property. The assessment is not exhaustive, but is a balance between the competing forces of indepth description and cost effectiveness. The goal was to accumulate enough data to make a judgment as to what role, if any, the existing trees may have in the proposed project.

KEY Health Rating:
1= Good, 2 = Fair, 3 = Poor, 4 = Dying/Immanent Hazard
Structural/Stature Rating:
1 – Good, 2- Fair, 3- Potential Hazard 4- Imminent Hazard Risk of Failure:
1 – Improbable, 2- Possible, 3 – Probable, 4 - Imminent Tree
Tag # Species
DBH (inches)
Height
(feet)
Canopy Width (feet) Canopy Cover
(sq ft) 1st Health Structure Risk Recommendation Conclusion Stem
2nd
Stem
3rd
Stem
4th
Stem
5th
Stem
6th
Stem Total (north on top)
501 Southern
Magnolia 6.5 6.5 24 8 165 1-21-2 1-2
Viable
Good form and vigor 7 10
4 502 Brisbane Box 8.5 8.5 30 8 380 1-2 2 3 Viable
Good form and vigor, too close to wall, lean 12 12
12 503 Brisbane Box 10 10 39 13 551 1-2 2 3 Viable
Good form and vigor, too close to wall 12 11
17 504 Brisbane Box 4.5 4.5 28 5 95 2-3 2 3 Trim if
preserving
Viable
Minor upper canopy deadwood, decreased vigor, near utilities 5 5 7 505 Brisbane Box 6 6 22 2 201 2 3 3 Viable
Excess lean, good vigor 10 8
12 506 Brisbane Box 5.5 5.5 24 7 165 1-2 2 3 Viable
Good form and vigor, near wall 7 7
8 507 Brisbane Box 6 6 24 9 298 2 2-3 2-3 Viable
Good vigor, lean 9 10
11 508 Brisbane Box 7 7 39 10 314 1-2 2-3 2-3 Viable
Good form and vigor 10 8
12 509 Brisbane Box 4 4 18 6 113 1-2 1-2 1-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 6 6
6 510 Brisbane Box 6.5 6.5 26 8 247 1-2 1-2 1-2 Viable
Good form and vigor, near wall 9 8.5
10 511 African
Sumac 15.5 15.5 33 12 531 22 3
Viable
Failed branch, increased risk of future failure 13 13
14 512 Brisbane Box 7 7 27 9 283 2 2 2 Viable
Lean, good vigor 12 7
10 513 Brisbane Box 8.5 8.5 25 12 330 2 2 2 Viable
680
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

Good form and vigor 118
10 514 Brisbane Box 14 14 36 13 6041-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor, near wall 14 13.5
15 515 Brisbane Box 6.5 6.5 32 10 3801-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 12 12
10 516 Brisbane Box66 248 2691-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 119
9 517 Brisbane Box55 248 2401-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 7 10
10 518 Brisbane Box4 4.5 8.5 238 165222 Viable
Good form and vigor, upper canopy deadwood 5 10 6
519 Brisbane Box 6.5 6.5 24 7.5 1951-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 88
8 520 Brisbane Box 5.56 11.5 24 9.5 2911-21-21-2 Viable Good form and vigor 10 10 9
521 Brisbane Box 9.5 9.5 25 10 3971-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 13 11
11 522 Brisbane Box 9.5 9.5 248 380222 Viable
Lean, good form and vigor 10 12
14 523 African
Sumac 10.5 10.5 35 10 594
1-2
22 Viable
Good form and vigor 15 15
15 524 Brisbane Box88 32 10 3461-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor, embedded tree tie 9 12
11 525 Brisbane Box88 27 10 3301-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 10 10
11 526 Brisbane Box66 277 298222 Viable
Good form, decreased canopy health 11 10
11 527 Brisbane Box99 28 11 3971-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 10 14
10 528 Brisbane Box88 34 10 4061-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 10 13.5
12 529 Brisbane Box99 27 10 3631-21-21-2 Viable
Codominant stem system, good vigor 10 13
681
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

10 530 African
Sumac 11.5 11.5 24 11 471
2 22
Viable
Good form and vigor 13 14
11 531 Brisbane Box88 11 4241-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 9.5 14
12 532 Southern
Magnolia
33 12
3 203
2-33
Viable
Diseased and canopy dieback 22
3 533 African
Sumac
99 23
9 3302
22 Viable
Good form and vigor 118
13 534 African
Sumac 10.5 10.5 22 12.5 649
1-2
1-21-2
Viable
Good form and vigor 14 15
16 535 Southern
Magnolia
55 19
8 2141-2
1-22
Viable
Good form and vigor 89
8 536 Date Palm 15 15 53 19 11341-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 19 19
19 537 Date Palm 15 15 47 15 7071-222 Viable
Good form, sparce canopy 15 15
15 538 Date Palm 15 15 49 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 539 Date Palm 3.5 3.5 50 22 15201-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 22 22
22 540 Southern
Magnolia
55 14
3 602-3
2-32-3
Viable
Dieback noted55

4.5 541 Southern
Magnolia
88 18
7 1431-2
22 Viable
Good form and vigor, flowering 76
7 542 Brisbane Box0 25 12 3301-21-21-2 Viable
Good form and vigor 119
9 543 Brisbane Box88 21 10 314322-3 Remove
Steep decline noted, retrenchment 9 10
11 682
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

544 African
Sumac 10 10 21 13 510
1-2
1-22
Viable
Good form and vigor 12 12
14 545 Date Palm 15 15 46 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 546 African
Sumac 16 16 31 18 934
2 22
Viable
Good form and vigor, flush cut pruning 16 18
17 547 Southern
Magnolia 4.5 4.5 115
2 572-3
22-3
Remove
Longitudinal stem canker, poor prognosis 35
7 548 Southern
Magnolia
55 18 8.5 177
2 22
Viable
Good form and vigor, upper canopy deadwood 7 7.5 7
549 African
Sumac 12 12 34 12 695
2 33
Trim to
rebalance if
preserving
Viable
Stem lean noted, flush cut pruning 16 14.5
17 550 Southern
Magnolia 3.5 3.5 13
4 712
22 Viable
Minor upper canopy Deadwood noted 54
6 551 Southern
Magnolia
44 17
7 1542
22 Viable
Minor upper canopy deadwood noted, fair form and vigor 77 7 552 Date Palm 13 13 44 17 907222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 553 Southern
Magnolia
33 12
4 443
2-32-3
Remove
Longitudinal stem canker, die back in canopy, epicormic sprouting, retrenchment 43 4 554 African
Sumac 10 10 28 14 572
2 22
Viable
Good form and vigor, flush cut pruning 15 13
12 555 Southern
Magnolia
44 15
4 443
2-32-3
Remove
Retrenchment noted in canopy 43
4 556 African
Sumac 12 12 24 14 660
2-3
22 Trim and
reevaluate if
keeping
Viable
Poor scaffolding in structure, stem lean, flush cut printing 15 14 15 683
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

557 Southern
Magnolia
55 16
6 1332
22 Viable
Good form and vigor67
7 558 Southern
Magnolia
55 18
8 1832
22 Viable
Good form and vigor7 8.5 7
559 Date Palm 14 14 52 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 560 Date Palm 14 14 53 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 561 Date Palm 16 16 54 18 10171-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 18 18
18 562 Brisbane Box99 31 11 3631-222 Viable
Good form and vigor, minor lean 11 10
11 563 Brisbane Box 9.5 9.5 269 338334 Urgent attention needed to
mitigate risk of
failure
Remove
Failed upper limb, increased risk of future failure 12 12

8.5 564 Brisbane Box77 328 214232 Viable
Good form and vigor88
9 565 Brisbane Box88 31 13 2542-322 Treat and
reevaluate if
keeping
Viable
Good form, evidence of exudation noted on lower stem 107 6 566 Brisbane Box77 31 12 227222 Viable
Good form and vigor 11 7.5

3.5 567 Brisbane Box99 36 13 462222 Viable
Good form and vigor 11 15

9.5 568 Southern
Magnolia
88 25
9 3142
22 Viable
Good form and vigor 11 10
10 569 Brisbane Box 10 10 386 36322-32 Viable
Good form and vigor, lean 12 13
12 570 Brisbane Box 9.5 9.5 39 11 380222 Viable
Good form and vigor 10 14 9
571 Brisbane Box77 28 12 415232 Viable
Codominant stem system with included bark, stem lean 129 13 572 Date Palm 14 14 54 18 10171-222 Viable
684
Tree Survey and Arborist Report

Good form and vigor 18 18
18 573 Date Palm 13 13 53 16 8041-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 16 16
16 574 Date Palm 15 15 51 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 575 Date Palm 16 16 52 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 576 Date Palm 16 16 53 18 10171-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 18 18
18 577 Date Palm 15 15 52 15 7071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 15 15
15 578 Date Palm 14 14 51 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 579 Date Palm 14 14 53 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 580 Date Palm 16 16 57 18 10171-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 18 18
18 581 Date Palm 15 15 57 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 582 Date Palm 16 16 58 18 10171-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 18 18
18 583 Date Palm 16 16 51 19 11341-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 19 19
19 584 Date Palm 17 17 51 17 9071-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 17 17
17 585 Date Palm0 51 16 8041-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 16 16
16 586 Date Palm 16 16 51 18 10171-222 Viable
Good form and vigor 18 18
18 685
Appendix C: Cultural Resources Study
686

CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDY FOR THE
2375 NORTH TUSTIN STREET PROJECT

CITY OF ORANGE,

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
APN’s 374-642-31 and -32
Lead Agency:

City of Orange
300 East Chapman Avenue
Orange, California 92866
Preparer:

BFSA Environmental Services,
a Perennial Company
14010 Poway Road, Suite A
Poway, California 92064
Project Proponent:

RE Consulting
5742 Calle Polvorosa
San Clemente, California 92673
April 21, 2025
687
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– i
Archaeological Database Information
Authors: James Shrieve and Andrew J. Garrison M.A., RPA Consulting Firm: BFSA Environmental Services,
a Perennial Company
14010 Poway Road, Suite A
Poway, California 92064
(858) 484-0915
Client/Project Proponent: RE Consulting
5742 Calle Polvorosa
San Clemente, California 92673
Report Date: April 21, 2025
Report Title: Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project, City of Orange, Orange County, California (APNs 372- 642-31 and -32)
Type of Study: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey
New Site(s): None
Updated Site(s): None
USGS Quadrangle: Orange, California (7.5-minute)
Acreage: Approximately 5.04 acres
Key Words: Survey; negative; no monitoring recommended. 688
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ii
Table of Contents
Section Page
MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT........................................................................ iv

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................1.0–1

1.1 Project Description............................................................................................1.0–1

1.2 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................1.0–1

1.3 Cultural Setting .................................................................................................1.0–5

1.3.1 Prehistoric Period....................................................................................1.0–5

1.3.2 Historic Period.........................................................................................1.0–8

1.4 Results of the Archaeological Records Search .................................................1.0–10

1.5 Applicable Regulations.....................................................................................1.0–11

1.5.1 California Environmental Quality Act.....................................................1.0–11

2.0 RESEARCH DESIGN.............................................................................................2.0–1

3.0 ANALYSIS OF PROJECT EFFECTS ....................................................................3.0–1

3.1 Survey Methods................................................................................................3.0–1

3.2 Results of the Field Survey...............................................................................3.0–1

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................4.0–1

5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED.......................5.0–1

5.1 Certification ......................................................................................................5.0–1

6.0 REFERENCES CITED............................................................................................6.0–1 List of Appendices
Appendix A – Resumes of Key Personnel
Appendix B – Archaeological Records Search Results*
Appendix C – NAHC Sacred Lands File Search Results*
*Deleted for public review and bound separately in the Confidential Appendix List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure 1.1–1 General Location Map...................................................................................1.0–2 Figure 1.1–2 Project Location Map ....................................................................................1.0–3 689
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– iii
List of Figures (Continued)
Figure Page
Figure 1.1–3 Project Development Map.............................................................................1.0–4 List of Plates
Plate Page
Plate 3.2–1 View of the entry drive, facing east.................................................................3.0–2 Plate 3.2–2 An overview of the property, facing northwest ...............................................3.0–2 Plate 3.2–3 An overview of the commercial building, facing northeast.............................3.0–3 Plate 3.2–4 An overview of the commercial building, facing southwest ...........................3.0–3 List of Tables
Table Page
Table 1.4–1 Cultural Resources Within One Mile of the Project.......................................1.0–10 690
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– iv

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY/ABSTRACT
In response to a request from the project applicant, BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company (BFSA), conducted a cultural resources study for the proposed 2375 North Tustin Street Project (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APNs] 374-642-31 and -32). The approximately 5.04-acre project is located at 2375 North Tustin Street, in the city of Orange, Orange County, California. The project is situated within an unsectioned area, Township 4 South, Range 9 West, of the San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian, as shown on the United States Geologic Survey (USGS) Orange, California Topographic Quadrangle map. The project consists of a proposal to demolish an existing structure and property for redevelopment.

The purpose of this investigation was to locate and record any cultural resources present within the project and subsequently evaluate any resources as part of the City of Orange’s environmental review process conducted in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The archaeological investigation of the project also included a review of an archaeological records search performed at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton (CSU Fullerton) in order to assess previous archaeological studies and identify any previously recorded archaeological sites within the project or in the immediate vicinity. The SCCIC archaeological records search did not identify any previously recorded resources within the subject property, although eight resources, seven historic and one prehistoric, are recorded within one mile of the subject property. During an historic property survey in 1993 (OR-03115), 2375 North Tustin Street is listed as being built in 1972 and mentioned along with 525 other buildings built post 1945 as not appearing to possess eligibility significance for National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Based upon aerial photographs, the property did not contain any structures until 1972. At some point between 2005 and 2009, the original building was demolished and replaced with new construction. A Sacred Lands File (SLF) search was also requested from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) which was returned with negative results.

Survey conditions were overcast with light intermittent rain. Ground visibility was limited to landscaped areas due to the previous development within the parcel. The subject property contains an existing commercial building with paved parking to the west and landscaped parking islands and property perimeter. No cultural resources were identified within the project limits as a result of the archaeological survey. The current commercial building was developed between 2005 and 2009. As such, this structure is not old enough to be considered for evaluation for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR).

Given the results of the cultural resource study, the currently proposed development will have no impact to any Historical Resources as defined by CEQA. Furthermore, due to the disturbed nature of the property from previous agricultural use (1946 to 1966) and development occurring between 1972 and 2009, there is little to no potential for the inadvertent discovery of significant archaeological deposits. Therefore, mitigation measures are not recommended, and the project should be allowed to proceed without additional archaeological studies. A copy of this 691
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– v
report will be permanently filed with the SCCIC at CSU Fullerton. All notes, photographs, and other materials related to this project will be curated at the archaeological laboratory of BFSA in Poway, California.
692
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Description
The cultural resources study program for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project was conducted in compliance with CEQA and City of Orange environmental guidelines. The approximately 5.04-acre project (APN’s 374-642-31 and -32) is located at 2375 North Tustin Street in the city of Orange, Orange County, California (Figure 1.1–1). The project is situated within an unsectioned portion (Township 4 South, Range 9 West) of the San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian, as shown on the USGS Orange, California topographic quadrangle (Figure 1.1–2). The project proposes the demolition and replacement of the existing commercial building with new residential development, associated parking and infrastructure (Figure 1.1–3). The decision to request this investigation was based upon the cultural resource sensitivity of the locality as suggested by known site density and predictive modeling. Sensitivity for cultural resources in a given area is usually indicated by known settlement patterns, which in Orange County were focused around freshwater resources and a food supply.

1.2 Environmental Setting
The 2375 North Tustin Street Project is generally situated in the Peninsular Ranges Geologic Province of southern California. The range, which lies in a northwest-to-southeast trend through the county, extends some 1,000 miles from the Raymond-Malibu Fault Zone in western Los Angeles County to the southern tip of Baja California. The current path of the Santa Ana River lies approximately one and half miles north of the project. Geologically, most of the project is mapped as late to middle Pleistocene-aged old alluvial fan deposits, characterized as moderatelyto well-consolidated silt, sand, and gravel. At the westernmost portion of the project, the surficial sediments are mapped as Holocene and late Pleistocene young alluvial fan deposits, mostly consisting of unconsolidated, alluvial silty sands (Wirths 2025).

The property contains an existing commercial building constructed between 2005 and 2009. Having previously been graded for development, the property is relatively flat with an average elevation of approximately 270 feet above mean sea level. Further vegetation within the property consists entirely of maintained commercial landscaping. The vegetation during prehistoric times most likely consisted of a river valley riparian environment within the Santa Ana River watershed, native oak trees, and coastal/inland sage/scrub and chaparral in the nearby foothills.
693
694
695
696
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–5

1.3 Cultural Setting

1.3.1 Prehistoric Period
Archaeological investigations in southern California have documented a diverse and rich record of human occupation spanning the past 10,000 years. In northern San Diego, Orange, and Riverside counties, most researchers organize prehistory into the Paleo Indian, Archaic, and Late Prehistoric Periods and history into the Mission, Rancho, and American Settlement periods. The San Dieguito Complex, Milling Stone Horizon, La Jolla Complex, Pauma Complex, and San Luis Rey Complex are the archaeological manifestations that have been used to describe the Archaic and Late Prehistoric periods in the region.

Paleo Indian Period (Late Pleistocene: 11,500 to circa 9,000 YBP) The San Dieguito Complex/Paleo Indian Period is associated with the terminus of the late Pleistocene (11,500 to 9,000 years before the present [YBP]). The term “San Dieguito Complex” is a cultural distinction used to describe a group of people that occupied sites in the region between 11,500 and 7,000 YBP. Initially believed to have been big game hunters, the San Dieguito are better typified as wide-ranging hunter/gatherers. The earliest evidence of San Dieguito Complex sites is known from San Diego County, the Colorado Desert, and further north along the California coast. These people abandoned the drying inland lakes of the present California desert and arrived in San Diego County circa 9,000 YBP, as documented at the Harris (SDI-149; Warren 1966), Rancho Park North (SDI-4392; Kaldenberg 1982), and Agua Hedionda (SDI-210/UCLJ-M-15 and SDI-10,965/SDM-W-131 [Moriarty 1967; Gallegos and Carrico 1984; Gallegos 1991]) sites.

A San Dieguito component appears to have been present in the lower strata, “Malaga Cove I,” at the Malaga Cove Site (LAN-138) in the city of Palos Verdes Estates in Los Angeles County (Walker 1951). Other Paleo Indian Period sites containing San Dieguito components in the coastal region of southern California have been identified at the Irvine (ORA-64 [Drover et al. 1983; Macko 1998]), Ballona Creek, Angeles Mesa, and Rancho La Brea (Wallace 1955: 215–218) sites.

Diagnostic San Dieguito artifacts include finely crafted scraper planes, choppers, scrapers, crescentics, elongated bifacial knives, and intricate leaf-shaped points (Rogers 1939; Warren 1967). This tool assemblage resembles those of the Western Lithic Co-Tradition (Davis et al. 1969) and the Western Pluvial Lakes Tradition (Bedwell 1970; Moratto 1984). Typical San Dieguito sites lack ground stone tools. The San Dieguito Complex is the least understood of the cultures that occupied the southern California region and debate continues as to whether the San Dieguito sites are actually different activity areas of the early Encinitas Tradition peoples (Bull 1987; Gallegos 1987), or whether the San Dieguito Complex peoples had a separate origin and culture from the Encinitas Tradition (Hayden 1987; Moriarty 1987; Smith 1987). According to this second scenario, the San Dieguito Complex peoples may have been assimilated into the dominant Encinitas Tradition culture (Kaldenberg 1982; Moriarty 1967). A third possibility is that the San Dieguito Complex gave rise to the Encinitas Tradition (Koerper et al. 1991). 697
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–6
Archaic Period (Early and Middle Holocene: circa 9,000 to 1,300 YBP) The Archaic Period begins with the onset of the Holocene around 9,000 YBP. The transition from the Pleistocene to the Holocene was a period of major environmental change throughout North America (Antevs 1953; Van Devender and Spaulding 1979). In southern California, the general climate at the beginning of the early Holocene was marked by cool/moist periods and an increase in warm/dry periods and rising sea levels. The warming trend and rising sea levels generally continued until the late Holocene. Archaeological research indicates that southern California was occupied between 9,000 and 1,300 YBP by a population(s) that utilized a wide range of both marine and terrestrial resources. A number of different archaeological manifestations based upon geographical setting, tool kit, and/or chronology are recognized during the Archaic Period, including the Milling Stone Horizon and San Dieguito, La Jolla, Encinitas, and Pauma complexes. Archaic sites generally contain milling tools, especially manos and metates, cobble and flake tools, dart projectile points and the concomitant use of the atlatl, crescents, shell, fish bone, and animal bone representing large and small game. Additionally, Archaic groups buried their dead as flex inhumations, a religious and cultural practice that is distinct from the succeeding Late Prehistoric groups.

The La Jolla Complex is regionally associated with the Encinitas Tradition (Warren 1968) and shared cultural components with the widespread Milling Stone Horizon (Wallace 1955). The coastal expression of this complex, which focused upon coastal resources and development of deeply stratified shell middens located primarily around bays and lagoons, appeared in the southern California coastal areas. Some of the older sites associated with this expression are located at Topanga Canyon, Newport Bay, Agua Hedionda Lagoon, and some of the Channel Islands. Radiocarbon dates from sites attributed to this complex span a period of more than 7,000 years in this region, beginning more than 9,000 YBP.

The Encinitas Tradition is best recognized for its pattern of large coastal sites characterized by shell middens, grinding tools closely associated with the marine resources of the area, cobblebased tools, and flexed human burials (Shumway et al. 1961; Smith and Moriarty 1985). While ground stone tools and scrapers are the most recognized tool types, coastal Encinitas Tradition sites also contain numerous utilized flakes, which may have been used to pry open shellfish.

Artifact assemblages at coastal sites indicate a subsistence pattern focused upon shellfish collection and nearshore fishing, which suggests an incipient maritime adaptation with regional similarities to more northern sites of the same period (Koerper et al. 1986). Other artifacts associated with Encinitas Tradition sites include stone bowls, doughnut stones, discoidals, stone balls, and stone, bone, and shell beads.

By 5,000 YBP, an inland expression of the La Jolla Complex, which exhibits influences from the Campbell Tradition from the north, is evident in the archaeological record. These inland Milling Stone Horizon sites have been termed “Pauma Complex” (True 1958; Warren et al. 1961; Meighan 1954). By definition, Pauma Complex sites share a predominance of grinding implements (manos and metates), lack mollusk remains, have a greater tool variety (including atlatl dart points, quarry-based tools, and crescentics), and seem to express a more sedentary 698
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–7
lifestyle with a subsistence economy based upon the use of a broad variety of terrestrial resources.

Although originally viewed as a separate culture from the coastal La Jolla Complex (True 1980), it appears that these inland sites may be part of a subsistence and settlement system utilized by the coastal peoples.

Late Prehistoric Period (Late Holocene: 1,300 YBP to 1790) The Late Prehistoric Period, sometimes referred to as San Luis Rey I and II, began approximately 1,300 YBP. Cremation, ceramics, the bow and arrow, small triangular points, the use of Obsidian Butte obsidian, and the reliance upon the acorn as a main food staple are the defining characteristics of the Late Prehistoric Period (Chartkoff and Chartkoff 1984; Gallegos 2002, Moratto 1984). These characteristics are thought to represent the movement of Shoshoneanspeaking groups into northern San Diego, Orange, Riverside, and Los Angeles counties. Economic systems diversified and intensified during this period with the continued elaboration of trade networks, cremation of the dead, the use of shell-bead currency, and the appearance of more laborintensive, yet effective, milling technologies such as the bedrock mortar for use in acorn processing.

Protohistoric Period (Late Holocene: 1790 to Present)
This period begins with the Hispanic intrusion into southern California and the founding of the Mission San Juan Capistrano near what is currently the Lake Forest area in 1776.

Ethnohistorical and ethnographic evidence indicates that three Shoshonean-speaking groups that occupied the southern and eastern portions of Orange County were the Luiseño, Gabrielino, and Acjachemem (Juaneño), each of which is culturally similar but that possess slight dialectic differences. Along the coast, the groups made use of the available marine resources by fishing and collecting mollusks for food. Seasonally available terrestrial resources, including acorns and game, were also sources of nourishment for these groups. The elaborate kinship and clan systems between these groups facilitated a wide-reaching trade network that included trade of Obsidian Butte obsidian, resources from the eastern deserts, and steatite from the Channel Islands. All three groups also shared a distinct world view that stemmed from use of the hallucinogen datura and an elaborate religion that included ritualized sand paintings of the sacred being Chingichngish (Bean and Shipek 1978; Kroeber 1976). Some notable differences, however, can be seen in the material culture between the three groups. For example, the Gabrielino used containers made from steatite, which is a soapstone material from the Santa Catalina Islands, instead of pottery, which was the preferred material for the Juaneño and the Luiseño (Kroeber 1976).

The Luiseño, Gabrielino, and Juaneño occupied sedentary villages most often located in sheltered areas in valley bottoms, along streams, or along coastal strands near mountain ranges.

Villages were located near water sources to facilitate acorn leaching and in areas that offered thermal and defensive protection. Villages were composed of areas that were both publicly and privately, or family, owned. Publicly owned areas included trails, temporary campsites, hunting areas, and quarry sites. Inland groups had fishing and gathering sites along the coast that were 699
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–8
utilized, particularly from January to March, when inland food resources were scarce. During October and November, most of the village would relocate to mountain oak groves to harvest acorns. For the remainder of the year, most would remain at the village sites, where food resources were within a day’s travel (Bean and Shipek 1978; Kroeber 1976).

The Aliso Creek watershed has been reported to be the ethnohistoric boundary between the Luiseño, Gabrielino, and Juaneño. The Gabrielino occupied territory northwest of Aliso Creek, the Juaneño occupied territory to the south, and the Luiseño occupied territory to the southeast and east. However, there is evidence indicating that the Juaneño territory actually extended farther north, possibly past the Santa Ana River into modern-day Huntington Beach (Boscana 1978 [1933]).

1.3.2 Historic Period
The historic period began on July 16, 1769, when the first Spanish exploring party commanded by Gaspar de Portolá (with Father Junípero Serra in charge of religious conversion of the native populations) arrived in San Diego to secure California for the Spanish (Palou 1926).

The natural attraction of the harbor at San Diego and the establishment of a military presence in the area solidified the importance of San Diego to the Spanish colonization of the region and the growth of the civilian population. Missions were constructed from San Diego to as far north as San Francisco. The mission locations were based upon a number of important territorial, military, and religious considerations. Grants of land were made to those who applied, but many tracts reverted back to the government due to lack of use. As an extension of territorial control by the Spanish, each mission was placed so as to command as much territory and as large a population as possible.

Mission San Juan Capistrano, located near the present Lake Forest area, exerted much influence over the Acjachemem (Juaneño), who either adapted to mission life, rebelled and ran away, or died from European diseases. While primary access to California during the Spanish Period was by sea, the route of El Camino Real served as the land route for transportation, commercial, and military activities. This route was considered to be the most direct path between the missions (Rolle 1969). As increasing numbers of Spanish and Mexican people, and the later Americans during the Gold Rush, settled in the area, the Native populations diminished as they were displaced or decimated by disease (Carrico and Taylor 1983).

By 1821, Mexico had gained independence from Spain and the northern territories were subject to political repercussions. By 1834, all of the mission lands had been removed from the control of the Franciscan Order under the Acts of Secularization. Without proper maintenance, the missions quickly began to disintegrate, and after 1836, missionaries ceased to make regular visits inland to minister the needs of the native peoples (Engelhardt 1921). Large tracts of land continued to be granted to those who applied or had gained favor with the Mexican government.

Grants of land were also made to settle government debts.

The Rancho Period represents the time between 1821 and 1848. By 1821, Mexico had gained independence from Spain and the northern territories were subject to political 700
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–9
repercussions. By 1834, all of the mission lands had been removed from the control of the Franciscan Order under the Acts of Secularization (Engelhardt 1921). Numerous Mexican land tracts, or rancheros, were established throughout coastal and interior California.

California was invaded by United States troops during the Mexican-American War of 1846 to 1848. The acquisition of strategic Pacific ports and California land was one of the principal objectives of the war (Price 1967). At the time, the inhabitants of California were practically defenseless, and they quickly surrendered to the United States Navy in July 1847 (Bancroft 1886).

In 1848, the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo granted sovereignty over Alta California, New Mexico, and Arizona to the United States, which began the American Settlement Period. The new colonial order soon seized power in California with disastrous results for the native people (Castillo 1978). European control over Alta California had been concentrated along the coast, but with the great influx of American colonists seeking land and mineral resources, the inland became more populated and native populations were displaced from more of their lands. Conflicts between the Native Americans and the intruding white colonists led to the establishment of reservations for some villages by executive order.

The cattle ranchers of the “counties” of southern California prospered during the cattle boom of the early 1850s. Raising cattle soon declined, however, contributing to the expansion of agriculture. The completion of the transcontinental railroad in 1869 encouraged developers, land speculators, and colonists to invest and live in southern California. Orange County’s economy changed from stock raising to farming, and growing grain or citrus crops replaced the raising of cattle in many of the county’s inland valleys (Blick 1976; Elliott 1965).

General History of the Orange Area
As part of a petition to the Spanish government in 1810, Jose Antonio Yorba and his cousin Juan Pablo Peralta were granted 78,941 acres of grazing land previously granted to Juan Pablo Grijalva, their uncle and father, respectively, “[t]he first land user in the Orange area … a retired Spanish soldier” (Maniery et al. 2006). It’s recorded that “Yorba chose the flatlands near the Santa Ana River at what became known as Olive. His son[s] … built adobes on the hills by Olive, out of the flood plain … [which] became known as Santa Ana Ranch and served as the rancho headquarters” (Maniery et al. 2006). According to one reference, “Yorba and Peralta each had nine children. As these descendants married, the family expanded and settled on different parts of the rancho” (Maniery et al. 2006).

During the 1860s, “the Yorba rancho was subdivided by heirs of the original grantees and [lawyers] Andrew Glassell and Alfred Chapman … took 4,000 acres in lieu of attorneys’ fees” (Maniery et al. 2006). Ten- to 40-acre parcels were formed from the subdivided land and placed for sale in 1870 as the “Richland Farm Lots” (Maniery et al. 2006). Following this, “Glassell’s brother, Captain William Glassell, surveyed and platted a new town named Richland in 1871; the name was changed to Orange two years later to satisfy postal requirements” (Maniery et al. 2006).

The change was necessary since “there was already a Richland, California, up near Sacramento” (Brigandi 2011).
701
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–10
Orange was incorporated in 1888 and “was primarily an agricultural community until the 1950s, when modern suburban development arrived” (Brigandi 2011). Around this time “Orange had a population of 600 and was a 3.1 square mile city bounded by” Batavia Street, Collins Avenue, La Veta Avenue, and Santiago Creek (City of Orange n.d.). Profitable crops included grapes, wheat, oats, barley, corn, fruit trees, a variety of vegetables, tobacco, and hops (Brigandi 2011), “but by 1920, oranges had become the city’s premier crop” (City of Orange n.d.). The population of the city grew during World War II, with “thousands of servicemen … [being] trained in Southern California” (City of Orange n.d.). “After World War II, returning soldiers and a massive influx of new residents to the state” contributed to the population boom and “Orange, located centrally in the Los Angeles Basin” became an attractive option and “its remaining open and agricultural space … [was developed] into bedroom communities” (Maniery et al. 2006).

Orange continued to expand throughout the subsequent decades and “is home to thousands of businesses, ranging from major Fortune 500 companies to family-owned stores,” in addition to Chapman University and Santiago Canyon College (City of Orange n.d.).

1.4 Results of the Archaeological Records Search
An archaeological records search for the project and the surrounding area within a onemile radius was conducted by BFSA at the SCCIC at CSU Fullerton. The archaeological records search results did not identify any previously recorded resources within the subject property; however, eight resources, seven historic and one prehistoric, are recorded within the search radius (Table 1.4–1). The previously recorded resources consist of one prehistoric artifact scatter, the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana headquarters, the Olive Heights neighborhood comprised of 48 individual properties, the Olive Civic Center, a California Historic Landmark (CHL) plaque for the location of Old Santa Ana, one single-family residence, one garage, and Marywood High School. The complete records search results can be found in Appendix B.

Table 1.4–1
Cultural Resources Within One Mile of the Project
Site Number Site Type
ORA-000646 Prehistoric artifact scatter
ORA-001324H Historic Old Santa Ana (Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana headquarters)
P-30-158639 Historic Olive Heights neighborhood (48
properties)
P-30-161992 Historic Olive Civic Center
P-30-162268 Historic Old Santa Ana (CHL Plaque)
P-30-177462 Historic single-family residence
P-30-177463 Historic garage
P-30-177664 Marywood High School
702
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–11
The SCCIC records search also identified 18 previous studies conducted within one mile of the proposed project. Two of the previous studies included the subject property (OR-3114 and OR-3115). Neither mention the subject property as significant at the time (1993) and the recent demolition (2005-2009) of the original building negates it entirely.

BFSA also reviewed the following sources to help facilitate a better understanding of the historic use of the property:
• The NRHP index
• Historic USGS data
• Office of Historic Preservation Built Environment Resource Directory • Historic aerial photographs (1946 to 2024)
These sources did not indicate the presence of archaeological resources within the project. The aerial photographs indicate the property contained an agricultural grove, likely citrus, as early as 1946. The grove is visible through 1963; however, by 1972 it had been removed and a commercial structure with parking first appear. Between 1972 and 2005 that structure and lot appear unaltered.

Sometime between 2005 and 2009 that structure was demolished and replaced with new construction. Subsequent photographs show little change to the property since the 2009 development.

BFSA also requested a records search of the SLF from the NAHC. The SLF search results were negative for any recorded Native American sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance within the project vicinity. All correspondence is provided in Appendix C.

1.5 Applicable Regulations
Resource importance is assigned to districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess exceptional value or quality illustrating or interpreting the heritage of Orange County in history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture. A number of criteria are used in demonstrating resource importance. Specifically, the criteria outlined in CEQA and City of Orange environmental guidelines provide the guidance for making such a determination. The following sections detail the criteria that a resource must meet in order to be determined important.

1.5.1 California Environmental Quality Act
According to CEQA (§15064.5a), the term “historical resource” includes the following:
1) A resource listed in or determined to be eligible by the State Historical Resources Commission for listing in the CRHR (Public Resources Code SS5024.1, Title 14 CCR.

Section 4850 et seq.).
2) A resource included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or identified as significant in an historical 703
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–12
resource survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, shall be presumed to be historically or culturally significant. Public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant. 3) Any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript, which a lead agency determines to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California may be considered to be an historical resource, provided the lead agency’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. Generally, a resource shall be considered by the lead agency to be “historically significant” if the resource meets the criteria for listing on the CRHR (Public Resources Code SS5024.1, Title 14, Section 4852) including the following:
a) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; b) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; c) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or
d) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
4) The fact that a resource is not listed in, or determined eligible for listing in the CRHR, not included in a local register of historical resources (pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code), or identified in an historical resources survey (meeting the criteria in Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code) does not preclude a lead agency from determining that the resource may be an historical resource as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(j) or 5024.1.

According to CEQA (§15064.5b), a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA defines a substantial adverse change as:
1) Substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource means physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired.
2) The significance of an historical resource is materially impaired when a project:
a) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical 704
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–13
characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for inclusion in the CRHR; or b) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to Section 5020.1(k) of the Public Resources Code or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code, unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or, c) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the CRHR as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA.

Section 15064.5(c) of CEQA applies to effects on archaeological sites and contains the following additional provisions regarding archaeological sites:

1. When a project will impact an archaeological site, a lead agency shall first determine whether the site is an historical resource, as defined in subsection (a).

2. If a lead agency determines that the archaeological site is an historical resource, it shall refer to the provisions of Section 21084.1 of the Public Resources Code, Section 15126.4 of the guidelines, and the limits contained in Section 21083.2 of the Public Resources Code do not apply.

3. If an archaeological site does not meet the criteria defined in subsection (a), but does meet the definition of a unique archaeological resource in Section 21803.2 of the Public Resources Code, the site shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Section 21083.2. The time and cost limitations described in Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(c-f) do not apply to surveys and site evaluation activities intended to determine whether the project location contains unique archaeological resources.

4. If an archaeological resource is neither a unique archaeological nor historical resource, the effects of the project on those resources shall not be considered a significant effect on the environment. It shall be sufficient that both the resource and the effect on it are noted in the Initial Study or Environmental Impact Report, if one is prepared to address impacts on other resources, but they need not be considered further in the CEQA process.

Section 15064.5(d) and 15064.5(e) contain additional provisions regarding human remains.

Regarding Native American human remains, paragraph (d) provides:
(d) When an initial study identifies the existence of, or the probable likelihood of, Native 705
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

1.0–14
American human remains within the project, a lead agency shall work with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC as provided in Public Resources Code SS5097.98. The applicant may develop an agreement for treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any items associated with Native American burials with the appropriate Native Americans as identified by the NAHC. Action implementing such an agreement is exempt from:
1) The general prohibition on disinterring, disturbing, or removing human remains from any location other than a dedicated cemetery (Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5).
2) The requirements of CEQA and the Coastal Act.
706
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

2.0–1

2.0 RESEARCH DESIGN
The primary goal of the research design is to attempt to understand the way in which humans have used the land and resources within the project through time, as well as to aid in the determination of resource significance. For the current project, the study area under investigation is west-central Orange County. The scope of work for the cultural resources study conducted for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project included the survey of an approximately 5.04-acre area.

Given the area involved, the research design for this project was focused upon realistic study options. Since the main objective of the investigation was to identify the presence of and potential impacts to cultural resources, the goal is not necessarily to answer wide-reaching theories regarding the development of early southern California, but to investigate the role and importance of identified resources. Nevertheless, the assessment of the significance of a resource must take into consideration a variety of characteristics, as well as the ability of a resource to address regional research topics and issues.

Although elementary resource evaluation programs are limited in terms of the amount of information available, several specific research questions were developed that could be used to guide the initial investigations of any observed cultural resources. The following research questions take into account the size and location of the project discussed above.

Research Questions:
• Can located cultural resources be associated with a specific time period, population, or individual?
• Do the types of any located cultural resources allow a site activity/function to be determined from a preliminary investigation? What are the site activities? What is the site function? What resources were exploited?
• How do located sites compare to others reported from different surveys conducted in the area?
• How do located sites fit existing models of settlement and subsistence for valley environments of the region?
Data Needs
At the survey level, the principal research objective is a generalized investigation of changing settlement patterns in both the prehistoric and historic periods within the study area. The overall goal is to understand settlement and resource procurement patterns of the project occupants. Therefore, adequate information on site function, context, and chronology from an archaeological perspective is essential for the investigation. The fieldwork and archival research were undertaken with the following primary research goals in mind:
1) To identify cultural resources occurring within the project; 2) To determine, if possible, site type and function, context of the resource(s), and 707
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

2.0–2
chronological placement of each cultural resource identified; 3) To place each cultural resource identified within a regional perspective; and 4) To provide recommendations for the treatment of each cultural resources identified. 708
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

3.0–1

3.0 ANALYSIS OF PROJECT EFFECTS
The cultural resources study of the project consisted of an institutional records search, an intensive cultural resource survey of the entire approximately 5.04-acre project, and the preparation of this technical report. This study was conducted in conformance with City of Orange environmental guidelines, Section 21083.2 of the California Public Resources Code, and CEQA.

Statutory requirements of CEQA (Section 15064.5) were followed for the identification and evaluation of resources. Specific definitions for archaeological resource type(s) used in this report are those established by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO 1995).

3.1 Survey Methods
The survey methodology employed during the current investigation followed standard archaeological field procedures and was sufficient to accomplish a thorough assessment of the project. The field methodology employed for the project included walking evenly spaced survey transects set approximately 10 meters apart while visually inspecting the ground surface. All potentially sensitive areas where cultural resources might be located were closely inspected.

Photographs documenting survey areas and overall survey conditions were taken frequently.

3.2 Results of the Field Survey
Staff archaeologist Mary Chitjian conducted the archaeological survey for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project on March 31, 2025, under the direction of Principal Investigator Tracy A.

Stropes M.A., RPA. The archaeological survey of the property was an intensive reconnaissance consisting of a series of survey transects across the subject property. Survey conditions were overcast with intermittent light rain; however, original ground surface visibility throughout the survey area was limited due to buildings and hardscape, which comprised the majority of the property. The subject property is characterized as an existing commercial building on the east side of the property with parking and landscaping to the west.

No cultural resources were identified within the project limits as a result of the archaeological survey. The current commercial building within the property was developed between 2005 and 2009. As such, this complex is not old enough to be considered for evaluation for the CRHR. Plates 3.2–1 to 3.2–4 provide overviews of the subject property. 709
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

3.0–2
Plate 3.2–1: View of the entry drive, facing east.

Plate 3.2–2: An overview of the property, facing northwest. 710
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

3.0–3
Plate 3.2–3: An overview of the commercial building, facing northeast.

Plate 3.2–4: An overview of the commercial building, facing southwest. 711
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

4.0–1

4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The cultural resources study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project, which was completed in accordance with City of Orange report guidelines and CEQA significance evaluation criteria, was negative for the presence of cultural resources. The records search results indicate that seven historic resources and one prehistoric resource have been recorded within one mile of the project.

Further, the review of aerial photographs and current survey results indicate that the property previously contained a structure and hardscape built in 1972. That structure was demolished between 2005 and 2009 and a new building was constructed in its place. Therefore, given the results of the cultural resource study, the currently proposed development will have no impact to any Historical Resources as defined by CEQA. Furthermore, due to the disturbed nature of the property from previous agricultural use (1946 to 1966) and development occurring between 1972 and 2009, there is little to no potential for the inadvertent discovery of significant archaeological deposits. Therefore, mitigation measures are not recommended, and the project should be allowed to proceed without additional archaeological studies.
712
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5.0–1

5.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED
The Phase I cultural resources study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project was directed by Principal Investigator Tracy A. Stropes M.A., RPA. The archaeological fieldwork was conducted by staff archaeologist Mary Chitjian and the report text was prepared by James Shrieve and Andrew J. Garrison M.A., RPA. Report graphics were provided by Emily Soong. Technical editing and report production were conducted by Payton Swanson. The archaeological records search was conducted by Emily Soong at the SCCIC at CSU Fullerton.

5.1 Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this archaeological report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and have been compiled in accordance with CEQA criteria as defined in Section 15064.5.

April 21, 2025
Andrew J. Garrison Date
Senior Project Archaeologist
713
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

6.0–1

6.0 REFERENCES CITED
Antevs, Ernst
1953 The Postpluvial or the Neothermal. Berkeley: University of California Archaeological Survey Reports 22:9–23.

Bancroft, Hubert Howe
1886 History of California (Vol. V); 1846-1848. The History Company, San Francisco, California.

Bean, Lowell John and Florence C. Shipek
1978 Luiseño. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8: California, edited by R.F. Heizer. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Bedwell, S. F.
1970 Prehistory and Environment of the Pluvial Fork Rock Lake Area of South Central Oregon. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon, Eugene.

Blick, James D.
1976 Agriculture in San Diego County. In San Diego – An Introduction to the Area, edited by Philip J. Pryde, pp. 121–135. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa.

Boscana, Geronimo
1978 Chinigchinich: A Revised and Annotated Version of Alfred Robinson’s Translation of Father Geronimo Boscana’s Historical Account of the Beliefs, Usages, Customs, and Extravagancies of the Indians of this Mission San Juan Capistrano Called the Acagchemem Tribe (1846). Edited by P.T. Hanna. Originally published in 1933, Fine Arts Press, Santa Ana, California. Reprinted by Malki Museum Press, Banning, California.

Brigandi, Phil
2011 A Brief History of Orange, California: The Plaza City. The History Press, Charleston, South Carolina.

Bull, Charles S.
1987 A New Proposal: Some Suggestions for San Diego Prehistory. In San Dieguito-La Jolla: Chronology and Controversy, San Diego County Archaeological Society Research Paper (1), edited by Dennis R. Gallegos.

Carrico, Richard L. and Clifford V. F. Taylor
1983 Excavation of a Portion of Ystagua: A Coastal Valley Ipai Settlement. On file at the City of San Diego Planning Department, Environmental Quality Division, San Diego, California.
714
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

6.0–2
Castillo, Edward D.
1978 The Impact of Euro-American Exploration and Settlement. In Handbook of North American Indians, Vol 8, edited by Robert F. Heizer. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Chartkoff, Joseph L. and Kerry Kona Chartkoff
1984 The Archaeology of California. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

City of Orange
N.d. History of Orange. Electronic Document, https://www.cityoforange.org/411/Historyof-Orange, accessed April 6, 2021.

Davis, E.L., C.W. Brott, and D.L. Weide
1969 The Western Lithic Co-Tradition. San Diego Museum Papers (6). San Diego Museum of Man, San Diego, California.

Drover, Christopher E., Henry C. Koerper, and Paul E. Langenwalter II 1983 Early Holocene Human Adaptation on the Southern California Coast: A Summary Report of Investigations at the Irvine Site (CA-ORA-64), Newport Bay, Orange County, California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 19(3&4):1–84.

Elliott, Wallace W.
1965 History of San Bernardino and San Diego Counties with Illustrations. Riverside Museum Press, Riverside, California. Originally published 1883, W.W. Elliott, San Francisco, California.

Engelhardt, Zephyrin
1921 San Diego Mission. James M. Barry Company, San Francisco, California.

Gallegos, Dennis R.
1987 A Review and Synthesis of Environmental and Cultural Material for the Batiquitos Lagoon Region. In San Dieguito-La Jolla: Chronology and Controversy. Editor. San Diego County Archaeological Society Research Paper No. 1. 1991 Antiquity and Adaptation at Agua Hedionda, Carlsbad, California. In HunterGatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Roger H. Colten. Perspectives in California Archaeology, Volume 1, Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.Gallegos, Dennis R. and Richard Carrico.
2002 Southern California in Transition: Late Holocene Occupation of Southern San Diego County. In Catalysts to Complexity: Late Holocene Societies of the California Coast, Edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Terry Jones. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.
715
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

6.0–3
Gallegos, Dennis R. and Richard Carrico
1984 Windsong Shores Data Recovery Program for Site W-131, Carlsbad, California.

Unpublished report on file at the South Coastal Information Center at San Diego State University, San Diego, California.

Hayden, Julian D.
1987 Notes on the Apparent Course of San Dieguito Development. In San Dieguito-La Jolla: Chronology and Controversy, edited by Susan M. Hector. San Diego County Archaeological Society Research Paper (1).

Kaldenberg, Russell L.
1982 Rancho Park North: A San Dieguito-La Jolla Shellfish Processing Site in Coastal Southern California. In Occasional Paper (6). Imperial Valley College Museum Society, El Centro, California.

Koerper, Henry C., Paul E. Langenwalter II, and Adella B. Schroth 1991 Early Holocene Adaptations and the Transition Phase Problem: Evidence from the Allan O. Kelly Site, Agua Hedionda Lagoon. In Hunter-Gatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by Jon M. Erlandson and Roger H. Colten, pp. 43–62.

Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Koerper, Henry, C., Jonathan E. Ericson, Christopher E. Drover, and Paul E. Langenwalter II 1986 Obsidian Exchange in Prehistoric Orange County. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 22 (1):33–69.

Kroeber, A.L.
1976 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 78, 1976 Dover Publications Edition, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.

Macko, Michael E.
1988 Neolithic Newport: Executive Summary – Results of Implementing Mitigation Measures Specified in the Operation Plan and Research Design for the Proposed Newporter North Residential Development at ORA-64. Macko, Inc. Unpublished report on file at the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, Fullerton, California.

Maniery, Mary L., Cindy L. Baker, and John W. Dougherty 2006 Research Design and Sensitivity Assessment for the City of Orange, Orange County, California. PAR Environmental Services, Inc. Unpublished report on file at the City of Orange, Orange, California.

Meighan, Clement W.
1954 A Late Complex in Southern California Prehistory. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 10(2).
716
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

6.0–4
Moratto, Michael J.
1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.

Moriarty, James R., III
1967 Transitional Pre-Desert Phase in San Diego County. Science 155. 1987 A Separate Origins Theory for Two Early Man Cultures in California. Environmental and Cultural Material for the Batiquitos Lagoon Region. In San Dieguito-La Jolla:

Chronology and Controversy, edited by Dennis Gallegos. San Diego County Archaeological Society Research Paper 1:49–60.

Palou, Fray Francisco
1926 Historical Memoirs of New California, edited by Herbert Eugene Bolton (4 Volumes).

University of California Press, Berkeley.

Price, Glenn W.
1967 Origins of the War with Mexico. University of Texas Press, Austin.

Rogers, Malcolm
1939 Early Lithic Industries of the Lower Basin of the Colorado River and Adjacent Desert Areas. In San Diego Museum Papers (No. 3 – 1989 printing). San Diego Museum of Man, San Diego, California.

Rolle, Andrew F.
1969 California: A History (Second Edition). Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York.

Shumway, George, Carl L. Hubbs, and James R. Moriarty III 1961 Scripps Estate Site, San Diego, California: A La Jollan Site Dated 5,460-7,370 Years Before the Present. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 93(3).

Smith, Brian F.
1987 The Excavations at Site CA-SDI-9956/W-3376. On file at the County of San Diego Planning and Development Services Department, San Diego, California.

Smith, Brian F. and James R. Moriarty III
1985 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of San Diego Motor Racing Park, Otay Mesa, San Diego. Unpublished report on file at the City of San Diego Environmental Analysis Division, San Diego, California.

State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
1995 Instructions for Recording Historical Resources. Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento.

True, Delbert L.
1958 An Early Complex in San Diego County, California. American Antiquity 23(3). 717
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

6.0–5
1980 The Pauma Complex in Northern San Diego County. Journal of New World Archaeology 3(4):1–39
Van Devender, T.R. and W.G. Spaulding
1979 Development of Vegetation and Climate in the Southwestern United States. Science 204:701–710.

Walker, E.F.
1951 Five Prehistoric Sites in Los Angeles County, California. Publications of the Frederick Webb Hodge Anniversary Publication Fund 6:1–116.

Wallace, William J.
1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214–230. Albuquerque.

Warren, Claude N.
1966 The San Dieguito Type Site: Malcolm J. Rogers’ 1938 Excavation on the San Dieguito River. San Diego Museum Papers (6).
1967 The San Dieguito Complex: A Review and Hypothesis. In American Antiquity 32(2):168–185.
1968 Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern Coast. In Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, C.I. Williams, ed. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1(3):1–14.

Warren, Claude N., D.L. True, and Ardith A. Eudey
1961 Early Gathering Complexes of Western San Diego County: Results and Interpretations of an Archaeological Survey. Archaeological Survey Annual Report 1960-1961.

University of California, Los Angeles.

Wirths, Todd A.
2025 Paleontological Assessment for the 2411 North Glassell Project, City of Orange, Orange County, California. BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company.

Unpublished report on file at BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company, Poway, California.
718
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX A
Resumes of Key Personnel
719
Andrew J. Garrison, MA, RPA
Senior Archaeologist
BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company
14010 Poway Road  Suite A 
Phone: (858) 679-8218  Fax: (858) 679-9896  E-Mail: [email protected] Education
Master of Arts, Public History, University of California, Riverside 2009 Bachelor of Science, Anthropology, University of California, Riverside 2005 Bachelor of Arts, History, University of California, Riverside 2005 Professional Memberships
Register of Professional Archaeologists
Society for California Archaeology
Society for American Archaeology
California Council for the Promotion of History
Society of Primitive Technology
Lithic Studies Society
California Preservation Foundation
Pacific Coast Archaeological Society
Experience
Senior Archaeologist June 2017–Present
BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company Poway, California Project management of all phases of archaeological investigations for local, state, and federal agencies including National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) level projects interacting with clients, sub-consultants, and lead agencies. Supervise and perform fieldwork including archaeological survey, monitoring, site testing, comprehensive site records checks, and historic building assessments. Perform and oversee technological analysis of prehistoric lithic assemblages. Author or co-author cultural resource management reports submitted to private clients and lead agencies.

Senior Archaeologist and GIS Specialist 2009–2017
Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. Orange, California
Served as Project Archaeologist or Principal Investigator on multiple projects, including archaeological monitoring, cultural resource surveys, test excavations, and historic building assessments. Directed projects from start to finish, including budget and personnel hours proposals, field and laboratory direction, report writing, technical editing, Native American consultation, and final report submittal.

Oversaw all GIS projects including data collection, spatial analysis, and map creation.

Preservation Researcher 2009
City of Riverside Modernism Survey Riverside, California Completed DPR Primary, District, and Building, Structure and Object Forms for five sites for a grantfunded project to survey designated modern architectural resources within the City of Riverside. 720
BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company, 2
Information Officer 2005, 2008–2009
Eastern Information Center (EIC), University of California, Riverside Riverside, California Processed and catalogued restricted and unrestricted archaeological and historical site record forms.

Conducted research projects and records searches for government agencies and private cultural resource firms.

Reports/Papers
2019 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Pipeline Rehabilitation AP-1 Project, City of San Diego, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 Cultural Resources Study for the Pioneer Redlands Project, San Bernardino County, California.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 Cultural Resource Report for the U.S. Allied Carriers Project, City of Riverside, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Go Fresh Gas Station Project, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2019 A Negative Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Barnaba Soccer Fields and Event Space Project, San Diego County, California.
2019 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the 2608 South Escondido Boulevard Project, City of Escondido. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Negative Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Quail Ridge Project, San Diego County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Phase I Cultural Resource Study for the Eastvale Self Storage Project, Eastvale, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Class III Archaeological Study for the Tuscany Valley (TM 33725) Project National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Compliance, Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California.

Contributing author. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Dudley Pomona Project, Pomona, California.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Phase I and II Cultural Resources Assessment for the Jack Rabbit Trail Logistics Center Project, City of Beaumont, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the 10575 Foothill Boulevard Project, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the IDI Rider 2 & 4 High Cube Warehouses and PVSD Channel Improvement Project, Perris, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2019 Cultural Resources Study for the County Road and East End Avenue Project, City of Chino, San Bernardino County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 721
BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company, 3
2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the IPT Perris DC III Western/Nandina Project, Perris, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 Phase II Cultural Resource Study for the McElwain Project, City of Murrieta, California.

Contributing author. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2019 A Section 106 (NHPA) Historic Resources Study for the McElwain Project, City of Murrieta, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Commercial/Retail NWC Mountain and Lake Streets Project, City of Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Section 106 (NHPA) Historic Resources Study for the Twin Channel Project, City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2019 Cultural Resources Study for the 10407 Elm Avenue Project, City of Fontana, San Bernardino County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2019 A Phase I Cultural Resource Study for the Olivenhain Apartments Project, Encinitas, California.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Phase I Cultural Resource Study for the Sanctuary Project, Encinitas, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Cultural Resources Survey Report for the Borrego Springs 141 Project, San Diego County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Natwar Project, Perris, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Morningstar Marguerite Project, Mission Viejo, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Anza Baptist Church Project, Riverside County.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Inland Propane Project, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2019 A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the First Industrial Wilson Avenue Project, Perris, California.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2018 A Class III Historic Resource Study for Phase 2 of the Atwell Project for Section 106 Compliance, Banning, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2018 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the Sewer Group 818 Project, City of San Diego. Brian F.

Smith and Associates, Inc.
2018 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the Stone Residence Project, 1525 Buckingham Drive, La Jolla, California 92037. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2018 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Hanna Banning Project, Banning, California.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
722
BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company, 4
2018 Cultural Resources Negative Findings for the SNC Mixed Use Project, San Diego County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2018 Cultural Resources Study for the Perrin Oak Ranch Winery Project, San Diego County, California.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2018 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey for the Stemley 42nd Street Project, San Diego, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2018 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the 320 West Cedar Street Project, San Diego, California.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2018 Cultural Resource Monitoring Report for the 8352 La Jolla Shores Drive Project, San Diego, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2018 Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of APNs 316-210-032 and -033, City of Moreno Valley, County of Riverside. Contributing author. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2018 A Cultural Resources Assessment for TR 37177, City of Riverside, Riverside County, California.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2018 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Seaton Commerce Center Project, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2017 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Marbella Villa Project, City of Desert Hot Springs, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2017 Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for TTM 37109, City of Jurupa Valley, County of Riverside. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2017 A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Jefferson & Ivy Project, City of Murrieta, California.

Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2017 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Nuevo Dollar General Store Project, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2017 A Phase I Cultural Resource Study for the Westmont Project, Encinitas, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc.
2017 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for the Winchester Dollar General Store Project, Riverside County, California. Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. 2017 Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment for TTM 31810 (42.42 acres) Predico Properties Olive Grove Project. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc.
2016 John Wayne Airport Jet Fuel Pipeline and Tank Farm Archaeological Monitoring Plan. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. On file at the County of Orange, California. 2016 Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment: All Star Super Storage City of Menifee Project, 2015-156.

Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. On file at the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside.
2016 Historic Resource Assessment for 220 South Batavia Street, Orange, CA 92868 Assessor’s Parcel Number 041-064-4. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. Submitted to the City of Orange as part of 723
BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company, 5
Mills Act application.
2015 Historic Resource Report: 807-813 Harvard Boulevard, Los Angeles. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. On file at the South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton. 2015 Exploring a Traditional Rock Cairn: Test Excavation at CA-SDI-13/RBLI-26: The Rincon Indian Reservation, San Diego County, California. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. 2015 Class III Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. Survey for The Lynx Cat Granite Quarry and Water Valley Road Widening Project County of San Bernardino, California, Near the Community of Hinkley.

Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. On file at the South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton.
2014 Archaeological Phase I: Cultural Resource Survey of the South West Quadrant of Fairview Park, Costa Mesa. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. On file at the South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton.
2014 Archaeological Monitoring Results: The New Los Angeles Federal Courthouse. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. On file at the South Central Coastal Information Center, California State University, Fullerton.
2012 Bolsa Chica Archaeological Project Volume 7, Technological Analysis of Stone Tools, Lithic Technology at Bolsa Chica: Reduction Maintenance and Experimentation. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc.
2010 Phase II Cultural Resources Report Site CA-RIV-2160 PM No. 35164. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. On file at the Eastern Information Center, University of California, Riverside. 2009 Riverside Modernism Context Survey, contributing author. Available online at the City of Riverside.

Presentations
2017 “Repair and Replace: Lithic Production Behavior as Indicated by the Debitage Assemblage from CA-MRP-283 the Hackney Site.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Fish Camp, California.
2016 “Bones, Stones, and Shell at Bolsa Chica: A Ceremonial Relationship?” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Ontario, California. 2016 “Markers of Time: Exploring Transitions in the Bolsa Chica Assemblage.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Ontario, California. 2016 “Dating Duress: Understanding Prehistoric Climate Change at Bolsa Chica.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Ontario, California. 2015 “Successive Cultural Phasing Of Prehistoric Northern Orange County, California.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Redding, California. 2015 “Southern California Cogged Stone Replication: Experimentation and Results.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Redding, California. 724
BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company, 6
2015 “Prehistoric House Keeping: Lithic Analysis of an Intermediate Horizon House Pit.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Redding, California. 2015 “Pits and Privies: The Use and Disposal of Artifacts from Historic Los Angeles.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Redding, California. 2015 “Grooving in the Past: A Demonstration of the Manufacturing of OGR beads and a look at Past SRS, Inc. Replicative Studies.” Demonstration of experimental manufacturing techniques at the January meeting of The Pacific Coast Archaeological Society, Irvine, California. 2014 “From Artifact to Replication: Examining Olivella Grooved Bead Manufacturing.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Visalia, California. 2014 “New Discoveries from an Old Collection: Comparing Recently Identified OGR Beads to Those Previously Analyzed from the Encino Village Site.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Visalia, California.
2012 Bolsa Chica Archaeology: Part Seven: Culture and Chronology. Lithic demonstration of experimental manufacturing techniques at the April meeting of The Pacific Coast Archaeological Society, Irvine, California.
2012 “Expedient Flaked Tools from Bolsa Chica: Exploring the Lithic Technological Organization.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, San Diego, California. 2012 “Utilitarian and Ceremonial Ground Stone Production at Bolsa Chica Identified Through Production Tools.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, San Diego, California.
2012 “Connecting Production Industries at Bolsa Chica: Lithic Reduction and Bead Manufacturing.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, San Diego, California. 2011 Bolsa Chica Archaeology: Part Four: Mesa Production Industries. Co-presenter at the April meeting of The Pacific Coast Archaeological Society, Irvine, California. 2011 “Hammerstones from Bolsa Chica and Their Relationship towards Site Interpretation.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Rohnert Park, California. 2011 “Exploring Bipolar Reduction at Bolsa Chica: Debitage Analysis and Replication.” Presented at the Society for California Archaeology Annual Meeting, Rohnert Park, California. 725
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX C
Archaeological Records Search Results
(Deleted for Public Review; Bound Separately)
726
Cultural Resources Study for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX D
NAHC Sacred Lands File Search Results
(Deleted for Public Review; Bound Separately)
727
Appendix D: Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation
728

UPDATED GEOTECHNICAL AND INFILTRATION EVALUATION

PROPOSED TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
2375 NORTH TUSTIN STREET

ORANGE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

PREPARED FOR

MELIA HOMES
9860 IRVINE CENTER DRIVE
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618

PREPARED BY
GEOTEK, INC.
1548 NORTH MAPLE STREET
CORONA, CALIFORNIA 92878
PROJECT NO. 4150-CR DECEMBER 30, 2024
729
GEOTECHNICAL | ENVIRONMENTAL | MATERIALS
December 30, 2024
Project No. 4150-CR
Melia Homes
9860 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, California 92618
Attention: Mr. Chad Brown,
Vice President of Planning & Development
Subject: Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation Proposed Townhome Residential Development
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, Orange County, California
Dear Mr. Brown:

GeoTek, Inc. (GeoTek) is pleased to provide the results of this Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation for a Proposed Townhome Residential Development that will be constructed at 2375 North Tustin Street, in the City of Orange, Orange County, California.

This report presents a discussion of GeoTek’s evaluation and provides preliminary geotechnical recommendations for site preparation, foundation design, preliminary infiltration rates and construction of proposed site improvements.

Based upon review and evaluation, site development appears feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint provided that the recommendations included in this report are incorporated into the design and construction phases of site development.
730
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 2
The opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact GeoTek.

Respectfully submitted,
GeoTek, Inc.

Bruce A. Hick
GE 2284, Exp. 12/31/26
Geotechnical Engineer
Edward H. LaMont
CEG 1892, Exp. 07/31/26
Principal Geologist
Distribution: (1) Addressee via email (one PDF file)
"\\geotekfs1\Orange\Projects\4101 to 4150\4150CR Melia Homes 2375 North Tustin Street Orange\Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation\4150CR UPD INFIL ORANGE 12-17-24.docx" 731
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES ............................................................................................. 1

2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT............................................................... 2 SITE DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................................................................2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................................................................................2

3. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ................................................................ 3 CURRENT FIELD EXPLORATION............................................................................................................................................3 PREVIOUS FIELD EXPLORATION .............................................................................................................................................5 LABORATORY TESTING..........................................................................................................................................................5

4. PREVIOUS REPORT REVIEW............................................................................................................ 6

5. GEOLOGIC AND SOILS CONDITIONS........................................................................................... 8 REGIONAL SETTING................................................................................................................................................................8 GENERAL SOIL/GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................................8

5.2.1 Artificial Fill........................................................................................................................................................................................8

5.2.2 Alluvium..............................................................................................................................................................................................9 SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER...........................................................................................................................................9

5.3.1 Surface Water .................................................................................................................................................................................9

5.3.2 Groundwater..................................................................................................................................................................................10 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY..................................................................................................................................................10

5.4.1 Seismic Design Parameters.......................................................................................................................................................10 LIQUEFACTION AND SEISMIC SETTLEMENT........................................................................................................................11 OTHER SEISMIC HAZARDS ...................................................................................................................................................12

6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................. 12 GENERAL.................................................................................................................................................................................12 EARTHWORK CONSIDERATIONS........................................................................................................................................13

6.2.1 Site Clearing and Demolition ...................................................................................................................................................13

6.2.2 Site Preparation............................................................................................................................................................................14

6.2.3 Pavement Areas............................................................................................................................................................................14

6.2.4 Hardscape Areas..........................................................................................................................................................................15

6.2.5 Preparation of Excavation Bottoms........................................................................................................................................15

6.2.6 Engineered Fills.............................................................................................................................................................................15

6.2.7 Excavation Characteristics ........................................................................................................................................................15

6.2.8 Slot-Cut Excavations....................................................................................................................................................................16

6.2.9 Shrinkage and Subsidence ........................................................................................................................................................16

6.2.10 Import Soils.............................................................................................................................................................................16 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................................................................17

6.3.1 Foundation Design.......................................................................................................................................................................17

6.3.2 Moisture Vapor and Retarding System.................................................................................................................................19

6.3.3 Miscellaneous Foundation Recommendations....................................................................................................................20

6.3.4 Foundation Setbacks...................................................................................................................................................................20

6.3.5 Soil Corrosivity...............................................................................................................................................................................20

6.3.6 Soil Sulfate Content.....................................................................................................................................................................20 732
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS
RETAINING AND SCREEN WALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ..................................................................................21

6.4.1 General Design Criteria..............................................................................................................................................................21

6.4.2 Cantilevered Walls.......................................................................................................................................................................21

6.4.3 Retaining Wall Backfill and Drainage ...................................................................................................................................22

6.4.4 Restrained Retaining Walls.......................................................................................................................................................23

6.4.5 Additional Retaining Wall Design Considerations .............................................................................................................23

6.5 CONCRETE FLATWORK.......................................................................................................................................................24

6.5.1 Exterior Concrete Slabs, Sidewalks and Driveways..........................................................................................................24

6.5.2 Concrete Performance................................................................................................................................................................24 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN .......................................................................................................................................25

6.6.1 Asphaltic Concrete Pavement ..................................................................................................................................................25

6.6.2 Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers..............................................................................................................................26

6.6.3 Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavement.......................................................................................................................27

6.6.4 Pavement Construction ..............................................................................................................................................................28 POST CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS .......................................................................................................................28

6.7.1 Landscape Maintenance and Planting ...................................................................................................................................28

6.7.2 Drainage ..........................................................................................................................................................................................29 PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS ....................................................................................................29

7. INTENT ............................................................................................................................................... 30

8. LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 30

9. SELECTED REFERENCES................................................................................................................. 31

ENCLOSURES
Figure 1 – Site Location Map
Figure 2 – Exploration Location Map
Figure 3 – Project Plan
Appendix A – Logs of Exploratory Borings (GeoTek, 2024) Appendix B – Laboratory Test Results (GeoTek, 2024)
Appendix C – Boring Location Plan, Boring Logs and Laboratory Test Results (Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., 2005)
Appendix D – Infiltration Test Data
Appendix E – General Earthwork Grading Guidelines
733
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 1

1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the site geotechnical conditions for a proposed townhome residential development to be constructed at 2375 North Tustin Street, in the City of Orange, Orange County, California, as outlined in GeoTek’s proposal P-1105024r-CR dated November 14, 2024. Services provided for this study included the following:
▪ Research and review of available geologic and geotechnical data and general information pertinent to the site,
▪ Review of a Geotechnical Investigation previously prepared for this site by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. (SCGI, 2005), as well as additional geotechnical reports issued by SCGI (SCGI, 2007) for the subject site. Select information contained in these reports was used in the preparation of this report,
▪ A site reconnaissance,
▪ Advancement of three (3) exploratory borings to depths ranging between about 10 to

25.2 feet below existing grades,
▪ Infiltration testing of two (2) test borings at depths of about ten (10) feet each within the area of the proposed project stormwater management facility (BMP) in the southwestern and southeastern portions of the site,
▪ Review and evaluation of site seismicity,
▪ Compilation of this Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation which presents GeoTek’s findings, preliminary recommendations and a general summary of pertinent geotechnical conditions relevant for site development.

The intent of this report is to aid in the evaluation of the site for future proposed development from a geotechnical perspective. The professional opinions and geotechnical information contained in this report may need to be updated based upon review of the final site development plans. These plans should be provided to GeoTek, Inc. for review when available. 734
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 2

2. SITE DESCRIPTION AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

SITE DESCRIPTION
The irregular-shaped project site is located at 2375 North Tustin Street in a mixed-use residential/commercial area of Orange, California. The project site is comprised of one (1) parcel of land totaling approximately 4.32-acres in size, located on the east side of Tustin Street, on the south side of East Heim Avenue, in the City of Orange, Orange County, California (see Figure 1, Site Location Map). California State Highway 55 (Costa Mesa freeway) is located adjacent to the eastern side of the project but does not provide direct access as it is separated from the site by a sound wall. The site is fenced/block walled along most of the site perimeter with access only available from Tustin Street, a paved and improved roadway adjacent to the western boundary of the site.

The site is bordered to the south by an existing mobile home park, a multi-family residential development and a commercial development. A munti-family residential development and commercial development border the proejct site to the north. The site is currently occupied by an existing approximate 45,000 square foot one-story retail building (Best Buy) and adjacent parking/drive lane/hardscape/landscape improvements. Numerous utility lines, light poles, loading docks, domestic trees, and associated improvements are present on the proejct site.

The site can be considered as having a relatively flat to gently sloping topography (see Figure 1).

Elevations range from approximately 271 feet above mean sea level (amsl) in the northeastern corner to about 263 feet amsl in the southwest corner. Drainage is generally directed in a southwesterly direction by sheetflow.

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
Based upon review of Site Plan - A, prepared by Summa Architecture and dated March 25, 2024 (see Figure 3, Project Plan), site development for the project will consist of 84 three-story row townhomes in multi-family structures (see Figure 3, Project Plan). The development will also include a recreation area, as well as stormwater disposal facilities, open space, perimeter/retaining walls, associated interior parking/driveways, underground utilities and other typical tract improvements.

It is anticipated that the residential structures will be of wood frame construction, supported by a post-tensioned (PT) slab foundation system. Although structural loading information was not 735
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 3
provided, GeoTek has assumed the structures will exert relatively light to moderate foundation loads. Maximum column and wall loads on the order of 100 kips and 3.5 kips per lineal foot, respectively, are estimated for the proposed structures. Once actual loads are known, that information should be provided to GeoTek to determine if modifications to the recommendations presented in this report are warranted.

On-site storm water disposal is proposed by means of underground disposal systems to be located in the southwestern and southeastern portions of the site. Cut and fills of less than approximately 5 feet in height, not including any recommended remedial grading are anticipated for site development. Perimeter/retaining walls are anticipated. Sewage disposal is anticipated to be be provided by a public sewer system. If site development differs from the assumptions made herein, the recommendations included in this report should be subject to further review and evaluation.

3. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING

CURRENT FIELD EXPLORATION
The current field exploration by GeoTek for this evaluation was conducted on December 3, 2024. For the geotechnical portion of the investigation, one (1) exploratory boring (Boring B-1) was excavated with a hollow-stem auger drill rig to a depth of about 25.3 feet below the existing ground surface at the boring location. For the infiltration part of the study, two (2) test borings were excavated to a depth of approximately ten (10) feet each below the existing ground location within the proposed stormwater management chambers (BMP) in the southwestern and southeastern portions of the site.

A hollow-stem auger with an outside diameter of approximately 8.0 inches was utilized to conduct the borings. The inside diameter of the auger was approximately 4.5 inches. A geologist from GeoTek, Inc. logged the exploratory borings and obtained soil samples from within the borings. The boring and infiltration test locations are presented on Figure 2. The logs of the exploratory borings are included in Appendix A.

The exploration logs in Appendix A show subsurface conditions at the dates and locations indicated and may not be representative of other locations and times. The stratification lines presented on the logs represent the approximate boundaries between soil types, and the transitions may be gradual.
736
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 4
In the geotechnical boring, relatively undisturbed soil samples were recovered at various intervals with a California sampler. The California sampler is a 2.9-inch outside diameter, 2.5-inch inside diameter, split barrel sampler lined with brass rings. The sampler is approximately 18 inches in length. The sampler conformed to the requirements of ASTM D 3550. A 140-pound automatic trip hammer was utilized, dropping approximately 30 inches for each blow. The relatively undisturbed samples, together with bulk samples of representative soil types, were returned to the laboratory for testing and evaluation.

Infiltration Testing
Two (2) borings (Borings I-1 and I-2) were excavated on the project site to evaluate preliminary infiltration rates for the proposed stormwater management facilities to be located in the southwestern and southeastern portions of the site. The boring diameter was approximately eight inches. Percolation testing was performed within the lower approximately 24 inches in the borings by a representative of GeoTek, in general conformance with the Boring Percolation Test Procedure outlined in the Technical Guidance Document Appendix VII (Orange County, 2013).

As required, the percolation rates were corrected to account for discharge of water from both the sides and bottom of the borings. This correction was done using the Porchet Method, obtaining the infiltration rates tabulated below:

SUMMARY OF RESULTS
Boring
Observed Infiltration Rate,
Kobserved
(inches per hour)
Measured Infiltration Rate,
Kmeasured
(inches per hour)
I-1 7.7 3.86
I-2 1.1 0.57
As recommended by the referenced Technical Guidance Document (Orange County, 2013), a factor of safety of 2.0 was applied to the observed (field) rates to estimate measured infiltration rates. As shown on the table above, poor to favorable infiltration rates (0.57 to 3.86 inches per hour) were encountered at the site. Detailed infiltration test data is included in Appendix D.

Stormwater BMP systems should be setback from foundations and improvements as required by the regulatory agency or jurisdiction.

It should be noted that the infiltration rates provided above were performed in relatively undisturbed on-site soil. Infiltration rates will vary and are mostly dependent on the underlying consistency of the site soils and relative density. Infiltration rates may be impacted by the weight of equipment travelling over the soils, placement of engineered fill and other various factors. 737
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 5
GeoTek assumes no responsibility or liability for the ultimate design or performance of the storm water facility.

Representatives of GeoTek should observe the soils exposed at the bottom of the stormwater management basin during construction/earthwork operations to confirm suitability and that the conditions exposed are as anticipated for the proposed stormwater disposal basin.

PREVIOUS FIELD EXPLORATION
Field explorations were previously performed at this site by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. (SCGI) in February, 2005. The subsurface exploration program conducted by SCGI occurred on February 9 and 23, and included the excavation of five (5) exploratory borings (B-1 through B-5) to a maximum depth of 32 feet below existing grades. The approximate locations of the SCGI excavations for the project are presented on the Boring Location Plan (Plate 2) attached to the referenced SCGI report dated March 29, 2005, prepared by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. (SCGI, 2005). This plan is included in Appendix C of this report. The logs of the exploratory borings performed by SCGI are also included in Appendix C of this report.

LABORATORY TESTING
Laboratory testing was previously performed by Southern California Geotechnical, Inc. as indicated in their report dated March 29, 2005 (SCGI, 2005). This laboratory testing included insitu dry density and moisture content, expansion index, direct shear, consolidation, and soluble sulfate testing. The results of this laboratory testing are presented in Appendix C of this report.

Laboratory testing was recently performed by GeoTek on selected relatively undisturbed and bulk soil samples collected during the recent field exploration. The purpose of the laboratory testing was to confirm the field classification of the soil materials encountered and to evaluate the physical properties of the onsite soils for use in engineering design and analysis. Results of the laboratory testing program along with a brief description and relevant information regarding testing procedures are included in Appendix B.
738
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 6

4. PREVIOUS REPORT REVIEW
Geotechnical Investigation (Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., 2005) SCGI issued the referenced Geotechnical Investigation for the project on March 29, 2005. SCGI stated that detailed site plans for the proposed development had not been prepared at the time of their field exploration. SCGI understood that the proposed project would consist of the demolition of an existing site structure (Brunswick Orange Bowl) and construction of several two and three-story structures. Field exploration was conducted by drilling and sampling five (5) hollow stem auger borings to a maximum depth of approximately 32 below existing grades.

Boring B-1 was terminated at approximately 32 feet due to auger refusal on gravel and cobbles.

SCGI reported that artificial fill was encountered beneath existing pavement sections at Boring B-5 and extended to a depth of 3± feet below existing grade. SCGI stated that additional soils classified as possible fill were encountered in all of the borings and extended to depths of up to

5.5± feet. These fill soils consisted of stiff to very stiff clays with some fine to coarse gravel (CL soil type based upon the Unified Soil Classification System).

Native soils (alluvium) were reported by SCGI to underlie the artificial fills at the site. The alluvium encountered to depths of 5.5± to 12± feet generally consisted of very stiff to hard silty clays with tract to some fine gravel content (CL soil type). Beneath these materials, the borings generally encountered interbedded zones of dense to very dense silty sands and very stiff to hard silty clays (SM and CL soil types) with varying amounts of fine to coarse gravel content, extending to depths of at least 32± feet (the deepest depth explored).

SCGI stated that the site soils possess a high expansion potential (EI = 108).

SCGI stated that groundwater was not encountered in their borings to a maximum depth of approximately 32 feet below existing site grades (Boring B-1). SCGI stated that based upon the Seismic Hazard Zone Map published by the Site of California, the project is not mapped as having a potential for seismic induced liquefaction. SCGI stated that based upon the soil encountered on the site and the depth to groundwater liquefaction is not considered to be a significant design concern for the project.

SCGI stated that remedial grading should be performed within the proposed building areas in order to remove the existing fill and possible fill soils and a portion of the near-surface native soils, as well as any soils disturbed by the demolition procedures. SCGI stated that that overexcavation was to extend to a depth of at least 3 feet below proposed pad grade and to a 739
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 7
depth of 3 feet below existing grade or to the fill/native content, or to a depth of 3 feet below the foundation bearing grade, whichever is greater, within the building areas.

SCGI provided seismic design parameters for the project structures based on the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC).

SCGI stated that shrinkage of reworked materials should be in the range of 8 to 10 percent.

SCGI estimated subsidence to be on the order of 0.1 feet.

SCGI provided geotechnical recommendations for shallow foundations and a conventional slab on grade system for the project structures, based on a “High” (90-120) expansion index laboratory testing. SCGI also reported the on-site soils as having a “negligible” water soluble sulfate content. No discussion regarding the potential corrosivity of the site soils and buried ferrous metals was provided.

SCGI provided geotechnical recommendations for site retaining walls for the project.

Preliminary pavement design recommendations for the project were also provided and were based on an assumed R-Value of 10.

No percolation testing was conducted for the referenced report dated March 29, 2005.

Geotechnical Update and Plan Review (Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., 2005) SCGI issued the referenced Geotechnical Update and Plan Review for the project on October 17, 2007. SCGI stated that the architectural site plan and conceptual grading plan indicated the proposed development will consist of a 45,750 square foot Best Buy store and a 1,7000 square foot retail outlot pad.

SCGI stated that based upon review of the submitted plans and a recent site reconnaissance, it was their opinion that the proposed development was suitable from a geotechnical standpoint, and the referenced report was still applicable.

SCGI provided additional recommendations for new asphalt concrete (AC) and Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavement sections for the proposed Best Buy development. 740
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 8

5. GEOLOGIC AND SOILS CONDITIONS

REGIONAL SETTING
The subject property is situated in the Peninsular Ranges geomorphic province. The Peninsular Ranges province is one of the largest geomorphic units in western North America. Basically, it extends roughly 975 miles from the north and extends from the Transverse Ranges geomorphic province to the tip of Baja California, from north to south. This province varies in width from about 30 to 100 miles. It is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the south by the Gulf of California and on the east by the Colorado Desert Province.

The Peninsular Ranges are essentially a series of northwest-southeast oriented fault blocks.

Several major fault zones are found in this province. The Elsinore Fault zone and the San Jacinto Fault zone trend northwest-southeast and are found in the near the middle of the province. The San Andreas Fault zone borders the northeasterly margin of the province.

More specifically to the subject property, Morton, D.M., and Miller, F.K., (2006) map the site to be underlain by old alluvial fan deposits (late to middle Pleistocene age). Additionally, the nearest known active fault to the site is the Elsinore fault (Whittier Section) located approximately 6.4 miles to the northeast.

GENERAL SOIL/GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS
A brief description of the soils encountered at the site as reported by SCGI is presented in the following sections and supplemented by the current GeoTek exploration findings. Based on the previous and current field explorations, the area investigated has artificial fill which transitions into deeper alluvium.

5.2.1 Artificial Fill
SCGI reported that artificial fill was encountered beneath existing pavement sections at Boring B-5 and extended to a depth of 3± feet below existing grade prior to development of the site.

SCGI stated that additional soils classified as possible fill were encountered in all of the borings and extended to depths of up to 5.5± feet. These fill soils consisted of stiff to very stiff clays with some fine to coarse gravel (CL soil type based upon the Unified Soil Classification System).

Compacted fill is anticipated to be present within the existing building area and pavement areas. 741
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 9
Asphalt concrete pavement sections, consisting of asphalt concrete (AC) and crushed miscellaneous base (CBB), were encountered at all of the boring locations during GeoTek’s recent site exploration.

5.2.2 Alluvium
SCGI reported that mostly clayey alluvium was encountered to depths of 5.5± to 12± feet. This alluvium was stated by SCGI to generally consist of very stiff to hard silty clays with tract to some fine gravel content (CL soil type). Beneath these materials, SCGI state that the borings generally encountered interbedded zones of dense to very dense silty sands and very stiff to hard silty clays (SM and CL soil types) with varying amounts of fine to coarse gravel content, extending to depths of at least 32± feet (the deepest depth explored). SCGI stated that the site soils possess a high expansion potential (EI = 108).

GeoTek’s recent exploration also encountered alluvium below the existing asphalt concrete pavement sections to the maximum depth explored of approximately 26.5 feet below existing site grades at the boring locations. The alluvium consisted of interbedded layers of clay, clayey sand, silty sands and fine to coarse gravel CL, SC, SM and GP soil types).

SCGI (2005) and GeoTek’s current laboratory testing indicated that the near surface soils exhibit a “Medium” (51≤EI≤90) to “High” (91≤EI≤120) Expansion Index when tested in accordance with ASTM D 4829. Based on the SCGI and current GeoTek laboratory test results, the near surface soils have a soluble sulfate content of less than 0.1 percent. The results of the recent testing performed by GeoTek indicate that the soil samples were considered “highly corrosive” to buried ferrous metals, based on the guidelines provided in Corrosion Basics: An Introduction (Roberge, 2005).

SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER

5.3.1 Surface Water
Surface water was not observed during the previous or current site explorations. If encountered during earthwork construction, surface water on this site is the result of precipitation or possibly some minor surface run-off from surrounding areas. Overall site drainage is generally in a northerly direction, as directed by site topography. Provisions for surface drainage will need to be accounted for by the project civil engineer.
742
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 10

5.3.2 Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered in the previous site borings conducted by SCGI to a maximum depth of about 32 feet (Boring B-1) at the time of drilling or the current GeoTek borings to a maximum depth of about 26.5 feet. The California Water Data Library shows that the depth to groundwater in the site region is in excess of 40 feet. The depth of historic groundwater at the site is estimated to be greater than 40 feet below existing grades.

Based on the above, groundwater is not anticipated to be a factor during the site grading.

However, seasonal perched groundwater may be encountered during grading within portions of the site.

FAULTING AND SEISMICITY
The geologic structure of the entire southern California area is dominated mainly by northwesttrending faults associated with the San Andreas system. The site is in a seismically active region.

No active or potentially active fault is known to exist at this site nor is the site situated within an “Alquist-Priolo” Earthquake Fault Zone (Bryant and Hart, 2007; CGS, 1986). The subject property is not located within a State of California Seismic Hazard Zone for earthquake induced liquefaction (CGS, 1997). The subject property is not located within a State of California Seismic Hazard Zone for earthquake induced landsliding. The nearest known active fault to the site is the Elsinore fault (Whittier Section) located approximately 6.4 miles to the north.

5.4.1 Seismic Design Parameters
The site is located at approximately 33.8279 degrees Latitude and -117.8340 degrees Longitude.

Based on the relatively dense soil conditions encountered across the site, a Site Class “D” is considered appropriate for this project. Site spectral accelerations (Sa and S1), for 0.2 and 1.0 second periods for a Class “D” site, was determined from the SEAOC/OSHPD web interface that utilizes the USGS web services and retrieves the seismic design data and presents that information in a report format.

The following seismic design parameters, based on the 2015 National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP)/ASCE 7-16/2022 CBC, are presented below:
743
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 11

SITE SEISMIC PARAMETERS
Mapped 0.2 sec Period Spectral Acceleration, Ss 1.0508g Mapped 1.0 sec Period Spectral Acceleration, S1 0.534g
Site Coefficient for Site Class “D”, Fa 1.0
Site Coefficient for Site Class “D”, Fv 1.766**
Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response
Acceleration for 0.2 Second, SMS

1.508
Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response
Acceleration for 1.0 Second, SM1

1.415g*
5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration
Parameter at 0.2 Second, SDS

1.005
5% Damped Design Spectral Response Acceleration
Parameter at 1 second, SD1

0.944
Site Modified Peak Ground Acceleration, PGAM 0.698g
Seismic Design Category D
*ASCE 7-16 Supplement 3 Section 11.4.8 requires a ground motion hazard analysis for structures on Site Class “D” for values of S1 greater than or equal to 0.2g. However, a ground motion hazard analysis is not required where the values of SM1 and SD1 are increased by 50%.

The SM1 and SD1 values shown above already include the 50% increase, so that exception can be obtained. **ASCE 7-16 Supplement 3 Section 11.4.8 indicates that the value of Fv should only be used for calculation of Ts, determination of Seismic Design Category, linear interpolation for intermediate values of S1, and when taking the exceptions under Items 1 and 2 of Section 11.4.8 for the calculation of SD1.

Final selection of the appropriate seismic design coefficients should be made by the project structural engineer based upon the local practices and ordinances, expected building response and desired level of conservatism.

LIQUEFACTION AND SEISMIC SETTLEMENT
Liquefaction describes a phenomenon in which cyclic stresses, produced by earthquake-induced ground motion, create excess pore pressures in relatively cohesionless soils. These soils may acquire a high degree of mobility which can lead to lateral movement, sliding, settlement of loose sediments, sand boils and other damaging deformations. This phenomenon occurs only below the water table, but, after liquefaction has developed, the effects can propagate upward into overlying non-saturated soil as excess pore water dissipates.

The factors known to influence liquefaction potential include soil type and grain size, relative density, groundwater level, confining pressures, and both intensity and duration of ground shaking. In general, materials that are susceptible to liquefaction are loose, saturated granular soils having low fines content under low confining pressures. 744
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 12
The project site is not located within an area mapped by the State of California for liquefaction potential. Due to the lack of shallow groundwater, the liquefaction hazard at the site is nil.

Due to the relatively dense/clayey nature of the subsurface soils and anticipated site grading, the seismic settlement potential of the site soils is anticipated to be minimal.

OTHER SEISMIC HAZARDS
Evidence of ancient landslides or slope instability at this site was not observed during the field investigation. Due to the relatively flat site topography and relatively low liquefaction hazard potential, the potential for seismic-induced lateral displacements (i.e., “lateral spread”) and slope instability hazards are considered negligible.

The potential for secondary seismic hazards such as a seiche and tsunami is considered negligible due to site elevation and distance from an open body of water.

6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

GENERAL
The anticipated site development appears feasible from a geotechnical viewpoint provided that the following recommendations, and those provided by this firm at a later date are incorporated into the design and construction phases of development. Site development, grading and foundation plans should be reviewed by GeoTek, Inc. when they become available so the recommendations contained in this report can be confirmed.

The near-surface upper site soils are anticipated to contain undocumented fill. In addition, removal of the existing site improvements and utility lines is anticipated to disturb the upper soils.

Therefore, the upper site soils are not considered suitable for foundation loading in their current condition. Remedial grading, consisting of overexcavation and recompaction of the upper site soils, is recommended to provide a uniform bearing for any proposed structures.

The site soils were found to exhibit a “Medium” (51≤EI≤90) to “High” (91≤EI≤120) Expansion Index when tested in accordance with ASTM D 4829. As noted in the proposed development section of this report, a post-tensioned (PT) slab foundation system will be used to support the 745
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 13
proposed structures. This foundation system should be designed to accommodate the site soil expansion potential and the total and differential settlement potentials provided in this report.

EARTHWORK CONSIDERATIONS
Earthwork and grading should be performed in accordance with the applicable grading ordinances of the City of Orange, the 2022 California Building Code (CBC) and recommendations contained in this report. The Grading Guidelines included in Appendix E outline general procedures and do not anticipate all site-specific situations. In the event of conflict, the recommendations presented in the text of this report should supersede those contained in Appendix E.

6.2.1 Site Clearing and Demolition
In areas of planned grading and improvements, the locations of existing utilities should be determined. Existing utilities should be relocated or abandoned. The site should be cleared of existing structures, foundations, abandoned utilities, pavements, slabs, trees, vegetation and other deleterious materials. Demolition of existing buildings/structures should include removal of all shallow foundations, floor slabs and any below-grade construction. Debris should be properly disposed of off-site. Voids resulting from site clearing should be backfilled with engineered fill.

Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) generated from the demolition of existing site improvements may be incorporated into site fills provided the following guidelines are implemented: 1) concrete should be free of rebar or other deleterious materials and should be broken down to a maximum dimension of six (6) inches; 2) concrete should not be placed within three (3) feet of finish grade in the building pad areas or within one (1) foot of subgrade elevations in the street/drive areas; 3) concrete should be distributed in the fill and should not be “nested” or placed in concentrated pockets.

Asphalt concrete (AC) should not be used in fill for building pads or landscape areas. This material may be used in pavement areas of the project or should be removed from the site.

Alternatively, existing PCC concrete, AC and aggregate base may be pulverized and reused as Crushed Miscellaneous Base (CMB) in new pavement sections. These pulverized materials should not contain any detrimental or deleterious materials (reinforcing steel, nails, metal, glass, plastic rubber, wood, organic matter, friable materials, elongated or laminated pieces, etc.). Any materials to be used as CMB should be tested to confirm conformance with appropriate Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (“Greenbook”) specifications (Section 200-2.4). 746
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 14

6.2.2 Site Preparation
Due to the non-uniform condition of the near-surface upper site soils, presence of undocumented fill/soils and expected disturbance form the removal of the existing site improvements, it is recommended that the soils be removed beneath the planned building footprints to a depth of at least five (5) feet below existing grades, or three (3) feet below the base of the proposed foundations, whichever is greater. It should be noted that the above recommendations are recommended throughout the majority of the site; however, deeper artificial fills may be present within the site. These artificial fills will require deeper removals accordingly. All undocumented fill soils shall be removed as part of remedial grading. The lateral extent of this recommended over-excavation should extend at least five (5) feet beyond the building limits, where obtainable.

Removal bottoms should be relatively uniform in soil type and not adversely porous and having an in-place density of at least 85 percent of the soil’s maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. Deeper removals may be required and should be determined during site grading by a GeoTek representative.

Following site clearing operations, over-excavation and lowering of site grades, where necessary, it is recommended that the exposed subgrade soils beneath all surface improvements be proof rolled with a heavy rubber-tired piece of construction equipment approved by and in the presence of the geotechnical engineering representative. All soil that ruts or excessively deflects during proof rolling should be removed as recommended by the GeoTek representative.

Following proof rolling and removal of any unsuitable bearing soil, the exposed subgrade should be scarified to a depth of about 12 inches, be moisture conditioned to at least 2 percent above the soil’s optimum moisture content and then be compacted to at least 90 percent of the soil’s maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D-1557 test procedures.

6.2.3 Pavement Areas
Undocumented fill should be removed below proposed pavement areas. If no undocumented fill is encountered or is relatively shallow, the natural soils should be overexcavated to a depth of 12 inches below existing grade or 12 inches below proposed finished grade, whichever is deeper.

Finished grade is defined as the top of the subgrade. The exposed soils in these areas and in cut areas should be scarified to a depth of approximately eight inches, moistened to at least 2 percent above the optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures.

Pavement subgrade should be firm and unyielding upon proof rolling with heavy construction equipment prior to placement of aggregate base material. 747
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 15

6.2.4 Hardscape Areas
Undocumented fill should be removed below hardscape areas. The exposed soils in these areas and in cut areas should be scarified to a depth of approximately eight inches, moistened to at least 2 percent above the optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. Due to the soil expansion potential, a minimum of four inches of gravel (1-inch minus) or crushed aggregate base should be placed below all exterior hardscape improvements.

6.2.5 Preparation of Excavation Bottoms
A representative of this firm should observe the bottom of all excavations. Upon approval, the exposed soils should be scarified to a depth of approximately eight inches, moistened to at least 2 percent above the optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum relative compaction of at least 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures.

6.2.6 Engineered Fills
The on-site soils are generally considered suitable for reuse as engineered fill provided they are free from vegetation, debris and other deleterious material. Engineered fill should be placed in loose lifts with a thickness of eight inches or less and moisture conditioned to at least two percent above the optimum moisture content.

Below and within the proposed building area, engineered fill should be moisture conditioned to at least 2 percent above optimum moisture content and be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures if a shallow foundation system is used.

Below other structural elements, such as hardscape areas and walls independent of the building, engineered fill should be moisture conditioned to at least 2 percent above optimum moisture content and be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures.

6.2.7 Excavation Characteristics
Excavation of the on-site alluvial soils is expected to be feasible utilizing heavy-duty grading equipment in good operating condition. All temporary excavations for grading purposes and installation of underground utilities should be constructed in accordance with local and CalOSHA guidelines. Temporary excavations within the on-site materials should be stable at 1.5:1 (horizontal: vertical) inclinations for cuts less than five feet in height. 748
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 16

6.2.8 Slot-Cut Excavations
Assuming that any existing block walls along existing site boundaries are screen walls (imparting minimal loads), GeoTek evaluated the use of slot-cut excavations adjacent to these improvements in order to facilitate the required remedial grading for construction of proposed site walls. Preliminary analyses by GeoTek using a soil cohesion of about 250 psf along a friction angle of approximately 24 degrees, an assumed slot-cut height of about five feet, and an assumed footing surcharge of approximately 1,000 psf yielded an approximate slot-cut width of six feet.

Wider slot cuts may be feasible if favorable conditions (i.e. denser soils with significant cohesion) are exposed in the site excavations.

Slot-cut excavations should follow an A-B-C sequence. Each “A” section should be excavated to the required depth and then backfilled with compacted soil (or wall section constructed).

Following completion of the “A” sections, the “B” sections are then excavated and backfilled/constructed and then all “C” sections are completed in a similar manner. A GeoTek representative should observe that the slot-cuts are being performed in conformance with these recommendations.

6.2.9 Shrinkage and Subsidence
Several factors will impact earthwork balancing on the site, including orchard tree removal, shrinkage, subsidence, trench spoil from utilities and footing excavations, as well as the accuracy of topography. Shrinkage and subsidence are primarily dependent upon the degree of compactive effort achieved during construction. For planning purposes, a shrinkage factor of 5 to 10 percent may be considered for the materials requiring removal and/or recompaction. Site balance areas should be available in order to adjust project grades, depending on actual field conditions at the conclusion of earthwork. Subsidence on the order of up to 0.1 foot may be anticipated for the underlying soils.

6.2.10 Import Soils
Import soils should have a “Very Low” (0-20) to “Low” (21-50) Expansion Index. GeoTek, Inc. also recommends that the proposed import soils be tested for expansion and corrosivity potential. GeoTek, Inc. should be notified a minimum of 72 hours prior to importing so that appropriate sampling and laboratory testing can be performed. 749
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 17

DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

6.3.1 Foundation Design
The soils are classified as having a “Medium” (51≤EI≤90) to “High” (91<EI<120) Expansion Index in accordance with ASTM D 4829. However, verification testing should be performed after site remedial grading.

The foundation elements for the proposed structures should bear entirely in engineered fill soils and should be designed in accordance with the 2022 CBC. Given the site soil expansion potential at the site, residential buildings should be supported by post-tension (PT) slab foundation systems. Geotechnical parameters for post-tension slab design, in general conformance with Design of Post-Tensioned Slabs-on-Ground, Third Edition with 2008 Supplement (PTI, 2008), are provided below. These recommendations are minimal recommendations and are not intended to supersede the design by the project structural engineer. *Required depth of perimeter beam/stiffening rib per structural calculations may govern.

The following assumptions were used to generate em and ym values: Thornthwaite Moisture Index = -20; constant suction value = 3.9pF; post-equilibrium case assumed with wet (swelling) cycle going from 3.9pF to 3.0pF and drying (shrinking) cycle going from 3.9pF to 4.5pF.

Based upon review, a modulus of subgrade reaction (E1) of 75 pci may be used in the design of the post-tensioned slab foundation system. It should be noted that this value is based upon standard one foot plate load tests. Depending upon the design methodology and foundation geometry this value may need to be modified.

DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR POST-TENSION SLABS
Foundation Design Parameter
Design Value
“High” Expansion Index
(LL≤46; PI≤26;
Passing #200 Sieve ≈ 60%;
Clay fines ≈ 20%)
Edge Moisture Variation Distance, em
-Edge Lift (swelling)
-Center Lift (shrinkage)

4.5 ft

8.7 ft
Soil Differential Movement, ym
-Edge Lift (swelling)
-Center Lift (shrinkage)
≈ 1.07 in
≈ 0.39 in
Exterior Perimeter Beam Embedment One- and Two-Story – 12 inches* Three-story – 18 inches*
Presaturation of Subgrade Soil
(Percent of Optimum)
Minimum 120% to
a depth of 18 inches
750
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 18
It should be noted that the criteria provided are based on soil support characteristics only. The structural engineer should design the slab and foundation reinforcement based on actual loading conditions.

The following criteria for design of foundations are preliminary and should be re-evaluated based on the results of additional laboratory testing of samples obtained near finish pad grade. An allowable bearing capacity of 2,000 pounds per square foot (psf) may be used for design of continuous and perimeter footings 18 inches deep and 12 inches wide, and pad footings 24 inches square and 12 inches deep. This allowable soil bearing capacity may be increased by 200 psf for each additional foot of footing depth and 100 psf for each additional foot of footing width to a maximum value of 3,000 psf. An increase of one-third may be applied when considering shortterm live loads (e.g., seismic and wind loads). These bearing values contain a minimum factor of safety of three (3).

The recommended allowable bearing capacity is based on an estimated maximum postconstruction static settlement of approximately 1-inch. Static differential settlement of about one-half of the total settlement over a horizontal distance of 40 feet could result. Estimated seismic settlements are anticipated to be minimal. The project structural engineer, foundation engineer, and earth retention structure designer should incorporate these settlement estimates into the design, as appropriate.

The passive earth pressure may be computed as an equivalent fluid having a density of 280 psf per foot of depth, to a maximum earth pressure of 2,800 psf for footings founded on engineered fill or competent native soil. A coefficient of friction between soil and concrete of 0.30 may be used with dead load forces. Passive pressure and frictional resistance may be combined without reduction. The upper one foot of soil should be ignored in the passive pressure calculations unless the surface is covered with pavements.

A grade beam, a minimum of 12 inches wide and 18 inches deep, should be utilized across large entrances. The base of the grade beam should be at the same elevation as the bottom of the adjoining footings.

It is recommended that control joints be placed in two directions spaced approximately 24 to 36 times the thickness of the slab in inches. These joints are a widely accepted means to control cracks and should be reviewed by the project structural engineer. 751
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 19

6.3.2 Moisture Vapor and Retarding System
A moisture and vapor retarding system should be placed below slabs-on-grade where moisture migration through the slab is undesirable. Guidelines for these are provided in the 2022 California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen) Section 4.505.2, the 2022 CBC Section 1907.1 and ACI 360R-10. The vapor retarder design and construction should also meet the requirements of ASTM E 1643. A portion of the vapor retarder design should be the implementation of a moisture vapor retardant membrane.

The effectiveness of the vapor retarding membrane can be adversely impacted as a result of construction related punctures. These occurrences should be limited as much as possible during construction. Thicker membranes are generally more resistant to accidental puncture than thinner ones. Products specifically designed for use as moisture/vapor retarders may also be more puncture resistant. Although the CBC specifies a 6-mil vapor retarder membrane, a minimum 10 mil thick membrane with joints properly overlapped and sealed should be considered, unless otherwise specified by the slab design professional. The membrane should consist of Stego wrap or the equivalent.

Moisture and vapor retarding systems are intended to provide a certain level of resistance to vapor and moisture transmission through the concrete, but do not eliminate it. The acceptable level of moisture transmission through the slab is to a large extent based on the type of flooring used and environmental conditions. Ultimately, the vapor retarding system should be comprised of suitable elements to limit migration of water and reduce transmission of water vapor through the slab to acceptable levels. The selected elements should have suitable properties such as thickness, composition, strength, and permeability to achieve the desired performance level.

Moisture retarders can reduce, but not eliminate, moisture vapor rise from the underlying soils up through the slab. Moisture retarder systems should be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable American Concrete Institute, Portland Cement Association, PostTensioning Concrete Institute, ASTM and California Building Code requirements and guidelines.

GeoTek recommends that a qualified person, such as a flooring contractor, structural engineer, architect, and/or other experts specializing in moisture control within buildings be consulted to evaluate the general and specific moisture and vapor transmission paths and associated potential impact on the proposed construction. That person should provide recommendations relative to the slab moisture and vapor retarder systems and for migration of potential adverse impact of moisture vapor transmission on various components of the structures, as deemed appropriate.

In addition, the recommendations in this report and GeoTek’s services in general are not intended to address mold prevention, since GeoTek, along with geotechnical consultants in 752
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 20
general, do not practice in the area of mold prevention. If specific recommendations addressing potential mold issues are desired, then a professional mold prevention consultant should be contacted.

6.3.3 Miscellaneous Foundation Recommendations
To minimize moisture penetration beneath the slab-on-grade areas, utility trenches should be backfilled with engineered fill, lean concrete or concrete slurry where they intercept the perimeter footing or thickened slab edge.

Soils from the footing excavations should not be placed in the slab-on-grade areas unless properly compacted and tested. The excavations should be free of loose/sloughed materials and be neatly trimmed at the time of concrete placement.

6.3.4 Foundation Setbacks
Minimum setbacks for all foundations should comply with the 2022 CBC or City of Orange requirements, whichever is more stringent. Improvements not conforming to these setbacks are subject to the increased likelihood of excessive lateral movement and/or differential settlement.

If large enough, these movements can compromise the integrity of the improvements. ▪ The outside top edge of all footings should be set back a minimum of H/3, where H is the slope height, from the face of any descending slope. The setback should be at least five feet and need not exceed 40 feet.
▪ The bottom of any proposed foundations should be deepened so as to extend below a 1:1 upward projection from the bottom edge of the nearest excavation and the bottom edge of the closest footing.

6.3.5 Soil Corrosivity
Corrosivity test results recently performed by GeoTek are presented in Appendix B. These test results indicate that the on-site soils are “highly corrosive” (1,005 ohm-cm) to buried ferrous metal. This corrosion classification is obtained from “Corrosion Basics: An Introduction,” by Pierre R. Roberge, 2nd Edition, 2005. Recommendations for protection of buried ferrous metal should be provided by a corrosion engineer.

6.3.6 Soil Sulfate Content
Based on the chemical test results presented in the SCGI report (see Appendix C) and recent testing performed by GeoTek (Appendix B), the sulfate test results on soil samples obtained from the project site indicate a soluble sulfate content of less than 0.1% by weight. Soluble sulfate contents of this level would be in the range of “negligible” (i.e., “S0” exposure classification) in accordance with ACI 318-19. Based on the test results and Table 19.3.1.1 of 753
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 21
ACI 318-19, no special recommendations for concrete are required for this project due to soil sulfate exposure.

RETAINING AND SCREEN WALL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

6.4.1 General Design Criteria
Retaining wall foundations independent of the building should be embedded a minimum of 18 inches into engineered fill. Retaining wall foundations should be designed in accordance with Section 5.3.1 of this report. Structural requirements may govern and should be evaluated by the project structural engineer. All earth retention structure plans should be reviewed by this office prior to finalization.

Site clearing and remedial earthwork for all earth retention structures should meet the requirements of this report, unless specifically provided otherwise, or more stringent requirements or recommendations are made by the wall designer. The soil used as backfill behind retaining walls should have a “Very Low” (0-20) Expansion Index and should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D 1557).

In general, cantilever retaining walls which are designed to yield at least 0.001H, where H is equal to the height of the wall to the base of the footing may be designed using the active condition.

Rigid earth retention structures (including but not limited to rigid walls, and walls braced at the top, such as typical basement walls) should be designed using the at-rest condition.

In addition to the design lateral forces due to retained earth, surcharges due to improvements, such as an adjacent structure, should be considered in the design of the retaining walls. Loads applied within a 1:1 (horizontal : vertical) projection from the surcharging structure on the stem of the retaining wall should be considered in the design.

Final selection of the appropriate design parameters should be made by the retaining wall designer based upon the local practices and ordinances, expected structure response, and desired level of conservatism.

6.4.2 Cantilevered Walls
The recommendations presented below are for cantilevered retaining walls up to six (6) feet high.

Active earth pressure may be used for retaining wall design, provided the top of the wall is not restrained from minor deflections. Appropriate fluid unit weights are given below for specific 754
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 22
slope gradients of the retained material. These do not include other superimposed loading conditions such as traffic, structures, seismic events, or adverse geologic conditions.

ACTIVE EARTH PRESSURES
Surface Slope of Retained
Materials
(h:v)
Equivalent Fluid Pressure*
(pcf)
Level 50
2:1 85
*The design pressures assume the backfill materials have an expansion index less than or equal to 20. Backfill zone includes the area between the back of the wall to a plane (1:1, h:v) up from the bottom of the wall foundation to the adjacent ground surface.

For walls with a retained height greater than six (6) feet, an incremental seismic pressure should be included in the wall design. Where needed, it is recommended that an incremental seismic load for unrestrained walls with level backfill of 10H
2 [Units: pounds per lineal foot of wall] should
be included into the wall design to account for seismic loading conditions, where H is the retained height of the wall. For unrestrained walls with a retained height greater than six (6) feet with backfill of a 2:1 [horizontal: vertical] gradient, a dynamic load increment of 17H 2 should be
included in the wall design. These incremental seismic loads may be assumed to be applied at a point 1/3H above the base of the wall.

6.4.3 Retaining Wall Backfill and Drainage
Wall backfill should include a minimum one-foot-wide section of ¾- to one-inch clean crushed rock or approved equivalent. The rock should be placed immediately adjacent to the back of the wall and extend up from a backdrain to within approximately 12 inches of finish grade. The portion of the rock opposite the back of the wall adjacent to the soil backfill should be covered with a layer of filter fabric comprised of Mirafi 140N or the equivalent. The upper 12 inches of backfill should consist of compacted on-site soil. Backfill placed within the active zone as defined by a 1:1 (h:v) projection from the back of the retaining wall footing up to the retained surface behind the wall should consist of very low expansive soil. The presence of other soils placed within the 1:1 projection will necessitate revision to the parameters provided and modification of wall designs.

The backfill soil should be placed in lifts no greater than eight inches in thickness, moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures. Proper surface drainage needs to be provided and maintained. Water should not be allowed to pond behind retaining 755
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 23
walls. Waterproofing of site walls should be performed where moisture migration through the walls is undesirable.

Retaining walls should be provided with an adequate pipe and gravel back drain system to reduce the potential for hydrostatic pressures to develop. A 4-inch diameter perforated collector pipe (Schedule 40 PVC or approved equivalent) in a minimum of one cubic foot per linear foot of ¾- inch or one-inch clean crushed rock or equivalent, wrapped in filter fabric should be placed near the bottom of the backfill and the water should be directed to an appropriate disposal area.

As an alternative to the drain, rock and fabric, a pre-manufactured wall drainage product (example: Mira Drain 6000 or approved equivalent) may be used behind the retaining wall. The wall drainage product should extend from the base of the wall to within two (2) feet of the ground surface. The subdrain should be placed in direct contact with the wall drainage product.

Walls less than two (2) feet in height do not require backdrains. Walls from two to four feet in height may be drained using localized gravel packs (e.g., approximately 1.5 cubic feet of gravel in a woven plastic bag) behind weep holes at 10 feet maximum spacing. Weep holes should be provided or the head joints omitted in the first course of block extended above the ground surface. However, nuisance water may still collect in front of the wall.

Drain outlets should be maintained over the life of the project and should not be obstructed or plugged by adjacent improvements.

6.4.4 Restrained Retaining Walls
Retaining walls that will be restrained prior to placing and compacting backfill material or that have reentrant or male corners, should be designed for an at-rest equivalent fluid pressure of 65 pcf, plus any applicable surcharge loading. For areas of male or reentrant corners, the restrained wall design should extend a minimum distance of twice the height of the wall laterally from the corner, or a distance otherwise determined by the project structural engineer.

6.4.5 Additional Retaining Wall Design Considerations
▪ Retaining and screen wall foundation elements should be designed in accordance with building code setback requirements. A minimum horizontal setback distance of five feet as measured from the top outside edge of the footing to an adjacent slope face is recommended.
▪ Wall design should consider the additional surcharge loads from superjacent slopes and/or footings, where appropriate.
756
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 24
▪ No backfill should be placed against concrete until minimum design strengths are evident by compression tests of cylinders.
▪ The retaining wall footing excavations, backcuts, and backfill materials should be approved by the project geotechnical engineer or their authorized representative. ▪ Positive separations should be provided in screen walls at horizontal distances not exceeding 20 feet.

6.5 CONCRETE FLATWORK

6.5.1 Exterior Concrete Slabs, Sidewalks and Driveways
Exterior concrete slabs, sidewalks and driveways should be designed using a four-inch minimum thickness. Some shrinkage and cracking of the concrete should be anticipated as a result of typical mix designs and curing practices utilized in construction.

Due to the soil expansion potential, a minimum of four inches of gravel (1-inch minus) or crushed aggregate base should be placed below all exterior hardscape improvements. In addition, reinforcement of exterior slabs with at least 6” x 6” – W2.6 x W2.6 welded wire fabric placed at the middle of the slab should be considered.

Sidewalks may be under the jurisdiction of the governing agency. If so, jurisdictional design and construction criteria will apply, if more restrictive than the recommendations presented in this report.

Subgrade soils should be pre-moistened prior to placing concrete. The subgrade soils below exterior slabs and sidewalks should be pre-saturated to a minimum of 100 percent of the optimum moisture content to a depth of 12 inches.

All concrete installation, including preparation and compaction of subgrade, should be done in accordance with the City of Orange specifications, and under the observation and testing of GeoTek, Inc. and a City inspector, if necessary.

6.5.2 Concrete Performance
Concrete cracks should be expected. These cracks can vary from sizes that are hairline to more than 1/8 inch in width. Most cracks in concrete, while unsightly, do not significantly impact longterm performance. While it is possible to take measures (proper concrete mix, placement, curing, control joints, etc.) to reduce the extent and size of cracks that occur, some cracking will 757
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 25
occur despite the best efforts to minimize it. Concrete undergoes chemical processes that are dependent on a wide range of variables which are difficult, at best, to control. Concrete, while seemingly a stable material, is subject to internal expansion and contraction due to external changes over time.

One of the simplest means to control cracking is to provide weakened control joints for cracking to occur along. These do not prevent cracks from developing; they simply provide a relief point for the stresses that develop. These joints are a widely accepted means to control cracks but are not always effective. Control joints are more effective the more closely spaced they are.

GeoTek, Inc. suggests that control joints be placed in two directions and located a distance approximately equal to 24 to 36 times the slab thickness. All concrete flatwork subgrade should be moisture conditioned to at least 120% of optimum moisture content down to a depth of 18” below subgrade prior to placing concrete.

Due to the soil expansion potential, a minimum of four inches of gravel (1-inch minus) or crushed aggregate base should be placed below all exterior hardscape improvements. In addition, reinforcement of exterior slabs with at least 6” x 6” – W2.6 x W2.6 welded wire fabric placed at the middle of the slab should be considered.

PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN

6.6.1 Asphaltic Concrete Pavement
Preliminary pavement thickness design is based on the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (2018).

The following preliminary pavement design recommendations are based on assumed Traffic Indexes of 5.0 for automobile parking and 5.5 for interior drives. An R-value of 10 was assumed for the determination of preliminary pavement sections for this report. Once the traffic loading information becomes more defined, revision to the pavement design recommendations may be warranted. It is recommended that the final pavement design be based on R-value testing of the as-graded subgrade soils within the pavement areas.
758
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 26
Based on the assumptions noted above, the following preliminary pavement section recommendations are provided for the site:

PRELIMINARY MINIMUM PAVEMENT SECTION
Traffic Index
Thickness of Asphalt
Concrete (inches)
Thickness of Aggregate Base
(inches)

5.0 (Local Street)

3.0 9.0

5.5 (Interior Drives)

4.0 5.0

9.0 7.0
Traffic Indices (TIs) used in the pavement design are considered reasonable values for the proposed residential street areas and should provide a pavement life of approximately 20 years with a normal amount of flexible pavement maintenance. Irrigation adjacent to pavements, without a deep curb or other cutoff to separate landscaping from the paving may result in premature pavement failure. Traffic parameters used for design were selected based upon engineering judgment and not upon information furnished to us such as an equivalent wheel load analysis or a traffic study.

Pavement subgrade should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction and 2 percent over optimum, and be firm and unyielding to heavy construction equipment prior to placing aggregate base materials. All base material should be compacted to at least 95 percent of the material’s maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557 test procedures. All materials and methods of construction should conform to the requirements of the City of Orange.

6.6.2 Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavers
Interlocking concrete pavers can be used for this project. The pavers are assumed to be approximately 3.2 inches (80 millimeters) in thickness. Concrete pavers should be underlain by

1.0 inch to 1.5 inches of bedding sand overlying four inches of aggregate base founded on compacted subgrade soils (90 percent relative compaction, at least 2% over optimum moisture content). The aggregate base should be compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures.

Where possible, the aggregate base should extend beyond the perimeter of the pavers a minimum distance of four inches.
759
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 27
The bedding sand should be placed and lightly moistened and compacted. Since this compaction cannot be tested it should be observed by a representative of this firm.

Historically, paver systems have experienced failures in areas where water has degraded the support characteristics of the underlying base and/or subgrade soils. Since paver systems are permeable and allow transmission of water into the underlying materials, it may be prudent to discuss with the paver designer/manufacturer what methods may be employed to address the issue of potential water introduction into the underlying materials. Underdrain systems, local subgrade reinforcement, tilting the pavement subgrade to drain away from paver areas and not pond, or additional structural elements such as geotextiles can be considered, particularly in high traffic areas and/or low areas where water will tend to collect. The recommendations of the designer/manufacturer should then be implemented in the design and construction of the paver system.

6.6.3 Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) Pavement
For the proposed vehicle parking areas, it is recommended that a minimum of six (6.0) inches of PCC pavement over 12 inches subgrade compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures and at least 2 percent over-optimum be utilized. For vehicle service and access lanes, it is recommended that a minimum of seven (7.0) inches of PCC pavement over 12 inches subgrade compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density be utilized. All pavement subgrade should be firm and unyielding to heavy construction equipment prior to base and PCC placement. This section should also be used in heavy truck traffic areas such as fire lanes, trash dumpster pads and approaches. Due to the soil expansion potential, a minimum of four inches of gravel (1-inch minus) or crushed aggregate base should be placed below all exterior pavement improvements. In addition, reinforcement of exterior slabs with at least 6” x 6” – W2.6 x W2.6 welded wire fabric placed at the middle of the slab should be considered.

Requirements of Section 90 of Caltrans Standard Specifications, and various ACI and ASTM standards regarding mixing and placing concrete should be followed. The PCC pavement should have a minimum modulus of rupture of 500 pounds per square inch, and a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 4,000 pounds per square inch. Concrete should incorporate a 1-inch maximum size aggregate and should be proportioned to achieve a maximum slump of four inches.

Instead of increasing the water content, a plasticizing admixture may be utilized to increase the workability of the concrete. The concrete should be properly cured after placement. Concrete should not be placed during hot and windy weather.
760
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 28
Crack control joints should be provided in the transverse direction spaced at horizontal intervals ranging from 24 to 36 times the thickness of the concrete.

6.6.4 Pavement Construction
All pavement installation, including preparation and compaction of subgrade and base material, placement and rolling of asphaltic concrete and placement of concrete pavement, should be done in accordance with the City of Orange guidelines, and under the observation and testing of GeoTek and a City inspector, where required.

Any aggregate base should consist of crushed rock with an R-Value and gradation in accordance with Crushed Aggregate Base (Section 400-2.4 of the “Greenbook” Regional Supplement Amendments). Any Crushed Miscellaneous Base shall conform to Section 200-2.4 of the Green Book.

Minimum compaction requirements for aggregate base should be 95 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 1557 test procedures for aggregate base. Jurisdictional minimum compaction requirements in excess of the aforementioned minimums may govern. The upper 12 inches of subgrade should be moisture-conditioned to at least 2 percent over optimum moisture and be compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction. The top of the subgrade and aggregate base should be graded to drain to the perimeter of the pavement.

POST CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS

6.7.1 Landscape Maintenance and Planting
Water has been shown to weaken the inherent strength of soil, and slope stability is significantly reduced by overly wet conditions. Positive surface drainage away from graded slopes should be maintained and only the amount of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be provided for planted slopes. Controlling surface drainage and runoff and maintaining a suitable vegetation cover can minimize erosion. Plants selected for landscaping should be lightweight, deep-rooted types that require little water and are capable of surviving the prevailing climate.

Overwatering should be avoided. An abatement program to control ground-burrowing rodents should be implemented and maintained. Burrowing rodents can decrease the long-term performance of slopes.
761
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 29
It is common for planting to be placed adjacent to structures in planter or lawn areas. This will result in the introduction of water into the ground adjacent to the foundations. This type of landscaping should be avoided.

6.7.2 Drainage
Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled down any descending slope. Water should be directed away from foundations and not allowed to pond or seep into the ground adjacent to the footings and floor-slabs. Pad drainage should be directed toward approved areas and not be blocked by other improvements. Roof gutters should be installed that will direct the collected water at least 20 feet from the buildings.

PLAN REVIEW AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS
It is recommended that specifications and foundation and grading plans be reviewed by GeoTek prior to construction to check for conformance with the recommendations of this report. It is also recommended that GeoTek, Inc. representatives be present during site grading and foundation construction to observe and document proper implementation of the geotechnical recommendations. The owner/developer should verify that GeoTek, Inc. representatives perform at least the following duties:
▪ Observe site clearing and grubbing operations for proper removal of unsuitable materials. ▪ Observe and test bottom of removals prior to fill placement. ▪ Evaluate the suitability of on-site and import materials for fill placement and collect soil samples for laboratory testing where necessary.
▪ Observe the fill for uniformity during placement, including utility trench backfill. Perform field density testing of the fill materials.
▪ Observe and probe foundation excavations to confirm suitability of bearing materials with respect to density.

If requested, a construction observation and compaction report can be provided by GeoTek, Inc. which can comply with the requirements of the governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the project. It is recommended that these agencies be notified prior to commencement of construction so that necessary grading permits can be obtained. 762
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 30

7. INTENT
It is the intent of this report to aid in the design and construction of the proposed development.

Implementation of the advice presented in this report is intended to reduce risk associated with construction projects. The professional opinions and geotechnical advice contained in this report are not intended to imply total performance of the project or guarantee that unusual or variable conditions will not be discovered during or after construction.

The scope of this evaluation is limited to the boundaries of the subject property. This review does not and should in no way be construed to encompass any areas beyond the specific area of the proposed construction as indicated to us by the client. Further, no evaluation of any existing site improvements is included. The scope of this evaluation is based on GeoTek’s understanding of the project and geotechnical engineering standards normally used on similar projects in this locality.

8. LIMITATIONS
GeoTek’s findings are based on site conditions observed and the stated sources. Thus, GeoTek’s comments are professional opinions that are limited to the extent of the available data.

GeoTek has prepared this report in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the engineering and science professions currently practicing under similar conditions in the jurisdiction in which the services are provided, subject to the time limits and physical constraints applicable to this report.

Since GeoTek’s recommendations are based on the site conditions observed and encountered, and laboratory testing, GeoTek’s conclusions and recommendations are professional opinions that are limited to the extent of the available data. Observations during construction are important to allow for any change in recommendations found to be warranted. These opinions have been derived in accordance with current standards of practice and no warranty of any kind is expressed or implied. Standards of care/practice are subject to change with time. 763
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 31

9. SELECTED REFERENCES
American Concrete Institute (ACI), 2006, Publication 302.2R-06, Guide for Concrete Slabs That Receive Moisture Sensitive Flooring Materials.
_____, 2010, Publications 360R-10, Guide to Design of Slabs-On-Ground. _____, 2018, Publications 318-19, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete.

American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2017, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,” ASCE/SEI 7-16, Third Printing, Errata Incorporated through March 15.

Bray, J.D., Sancio, R.B., 2006, “Assessment of the Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine-Grained Soils,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Volume 132, Issue 9, dated September 1.

Bryant, W.A., and Hart, E.W., 2007, "Fault Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zones Maps," California Geological Survey: Special Publication 42.

California Code of Regulations, Title 24, 2022, “California Building Code,” 2 volumes.

California Department of Transportation, 2020, “Highway Design Manual,” 7th Edition.

California Geological Survey (CGS, formerly referred to as the California Division of Mines and Geology), 1977, “Geologic Map of California.”
____, 2008, “Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California,” Special Publication 117A.
____, 2018, “Earthquake Fault Zones, A Guide for Government Agencies, Property Owners/Developers, and Geoscience Practitioners for Assessing Fault Rupture Hazards in California, Special Publication 42 (Revised), California Geological Survey (CGS), 1980, “State of California, Special Studies Zone, Elsinore Quadrangle,” dated January 1.

County of Orange, 2011, “Low Impact Development BMP Design Handbook, Appendix A – Infiltration Testing.”
GeoTek, Inc., In-house proprietary information.
764
Melia Homes Project No. 4150-CR
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation December 30, 2024 Orange, Orange County, California Page 32
Morton, D.M. and Miller, F.K., 1981, “Geologic Map of the Orange County, California, showing mines and mineral deposits,” California Division of Mines and Geology, Bulletin B-204, scale 1:48,000.

Morton, D.M. and Miller, F.K., 2006, “Geologic Map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30’ x 60’ Quadrangles, California,” US Geological Survey OF 2006-1217, scale 1:100,000.

Orange County, 2013, “Technical Guidance Document Appendix VII”.

OSHPD Seismic Design Maps (https://seismic maps.org/).

Roberge, P. R., 2005, “Handbook of Corrosion Engineering,” 2nd Edition.

Seismic Design Values for Buildings (http://geohazards.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php).

Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), 1999, Martin, G. R., and Lew, M., ed. “Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117, Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction Hazards in California,”, dated March 1999.

Southern California Geotechnical, Inc., 2005, “Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed Residential Development, 2375 North Tustin Avenue, Orange, California,” Project No. 05G124-1, dated March 29.
_____, 2007, “Geotechnical Update and Plan Review, Proposed Best Buy Store and Outlot Pad, 2355 N. Tustin Avenue, Orange, California,” Project No. 05G124-1, dated October 17.

Summa Architecture, 2024, “Site Plan - A, 2375 N. Tustin St. – 3 Story Row Townhomes, Orange,” dated March 25.
765
Melia Homes
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, Orange County, California
Project No. 4150-CR
Figure 1
Site Location
Map
Site Location
Modified from USGS
Orange 7.5-minute
Topographic Map Sheet
766
Figure 2
Boring Location
Map
Rexco Development
APNs 257-030-012, -014, and -050
Technology Center Project
Riverside, Riverside County, California
Project No. 3757-CR
Figure 2
Exploration
Location
Map
Melia Homes
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, Orange County, California
Project No. 4150-CR
LEGEND
(Locations are Approximate)
Site Boundary B-1 Geotechnical
Boring
B-1
I-2 Infiltration
Test
I-2
I-1
767
REC AREA 84 UNITS 4.35 AC - 19.3 DU/AC 3 STORY TOWNHOMES 168 GARAGE STALLS (2 CAR) 44 GUEST STALLS 212 TOTAL STALLS (2.52 ST/U) 39 PL 1 1,302 SF 2BD 12 PL 2 1,334 SF 2BD + DEN 30 PL 3 1,920 SF 3BD + DEN 3 PL 4 1,920 SF 3BD + WORK LWLWLW

12.1 25.0 NORTH SITE PLAN - A MAR 25, 2024 5256 S. Mission Road, Ste. 404 Bonsall, CA 92003 www.summarch.com p.760.724.1198 ARCHITECTURE ORANGE 2375 N. TUSTIN ST. - 3 STORY ROW TOWNHOMES MELIA HOMES 8951 Research Dr, # 100 Irvine, CA 92618 (949) 759-4367 0 30 60 90 SP 768

APPENDIX A

LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation
Proposed Townhome Residential Development
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, Orange County, California
Project No. 4150-CR
769

A - FIELD TESTING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES
The Modified Split-Barrel Sampler (Ring)
The Ring sampler is driven into the ground at various depths in accordance with ASTM D 3550 test procedures. The sampler, with an external diameter of 3.0 inches, is lined with 1-inch long, thin brass rings with inside diameters of approximately 2.4 inches. The sampler is typically driven into the ground 12 or 18 inches with a 140-pound hammer free falling from a height of 30 inches. Blow counts are recorded for every 6 inches of penetration as indicated on the log of boring. The samples are removed from the sample barrel in the brass rings, sealed, and transported to the laboratory for testing.

Bulk Samples (Large)
These samples are normally large bags of earth materials over 20 pounds in weight collected from the field by means of hand digging or exploratory cuttings.

Bulk Samples (Small)
These are plastic bag samples which are normally airtight and contain less than 5 pounds in weight of earth materials collected from the field by means of hand digging or exploratory cuttings. These samples are primarily used for determining natural moisture content and classification indices.

B – BORING/TRENCH LOG LEGEND
The following abbreviations and symbols often appear in the classification and description of soil and rock on the logs of borings/trenches:

SOILS
USCS Unified Soil Classification System
f-c Fine to coarse
f-m Fine to medium

GEOLOGIC
B: Attitudes Bedding: strike/dip
J: Attitudes Joint: strike/dip
C: Contact line
……….. Dashed line denotes USCS material change
Solid Line denotes unit / formational change
Thick solid line denotes end of boring/trench
(Additional denotations and symbols are provided on the log of borings/trenches) 770
GeoTek, Inc.

LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
7 MD, EI, SH, SR, AL, SA
11 CL 16.4 107.7 Expansion Index = 88
11 Liquid Limit = 46
Plastic Limit = 20
6 PI = 26
10 21.3 101.6 60% Passing #200 Sieve
15 11
20 SC 19.4 111.4
27 9
15 9.8 125.1
30 12
14 10.3 117.3
16 11 GP
17 30
50/3
50/3
---Small Bulk ---No Recovery ---Water Table
AL = Atterberg Limits
SR = Sulfate/Resisitivity Test
Silty clayey f SAND, yellow-brown, slightly moist, dense Silty CLAY, gray, slightly moist, very stiff
CLIENT: Melia Homes DRILLER: 2R Drilling Inc. LOGGED BY:

PROJECT NO.: 4150-CR
KLP
PROJECT NAME: 2375 N Tustin St DRILL METHOD: Hollw stem Auger OPERATOR: Jaime HAMMER: 140lbs/30in. RIG TYPE: Truck rig (CME 75)
LOCATION: See Boring Location Map DATE: 12/3/2024

SAMPLES
USCS Symbol
BORING NO.: B-1
Laboratory Testing
Depth (ft)
Sample Type
Blows/ 6 in
Sample Number
Water Content
(%)
Dry Density
(pcf)
Others

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
3" Asphaltic Concrete over 8" CMB
5 Alluvium:

Fine sandy silty CLAY, gray, slightly moist, trace asphalt pieces, stiff Olive-brown, trace rootlets, hard
10 Silty f SAND, yellow-brown, slightly moist, trace clay, trace m-c sand, dense Silty f SAND, light olive-brown, slightly moist, trace clay, medium dense 15 F-c GRAVEL, gray, slightly moist, little f-c sand, dense 20 Very dense
25 BORING TERMINATED AT 25.25 FEET
30LEGEND
Sample type: ---SPT ---Large Bulk
Lab testing:

EI = Expansion Index SA = Sieve Analysis
SM
RV = R-Value Test
SH = Shear Test HC= Consolidation MD = Maximum Density
No groundwater encountered
Boring backfilled with excavated materials
771
GeoTek, Inc.

LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
CL
GP
---Small Bulk ---No Recovery ---Water Table
AL = Atterberg Limits
SR = Sulfate/Resisitivity Test
CLIENT: Melia Homes DRILLER: 2R Drilling Inc. LOGGED BY: KLP PROJECT NAME: 2375 N Tustin St DRILL METHOD: Hollw stem Auger OPERATOR: Jaime PROJECT NO.: 4150-CR HAMMER: 140lbs/30in. RIG TYPE: Truck rig (CME 75) LOCATION: See Boring Location Map DATE: 12/3/2024

SAMPLES
USCS Symbol
BORING NO.: I-1
Laboratory Testing
Depth (ft)
Sample Type
Blows/ 6 in
Sample Number
Water Content
(%)
Dry Density
(pcf)
Others

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS
3" Asphaltic Concrete over 7" CMB
Alluvium:

Silty CLAY, gray-brown, slightly moist
5 10
BORING TERMINATED AT 10 FEET
No groundwater encountered
Boring backfilled with excavated materials
15 20
25 30LEGEND
Sample type: ---SPT ---Large Bulk
Lab testing:

EI = Expansion Index SA = Sieve Analysis
F-c GRAVEL, gray, slightly moist, trace f-c sand, trace clay RV = R-Value Test
SH = Shear Test HC= Consolidation MD = Maximum Density
772
GeoTek, Inc.

LOG OF EXPLORATORY BORING
CL
GP
---Small Bulk ---No Recovery ---Water Table
AL = Atterberg Limits
SR = Sulfate/Resisitivity Test
CLIENT: Melia Homes DRILLER: 2R Drilling Inc. LOGGED BY: KLP PROJECT NAME: 2375 N Tustin St DRILL METHOD: Hollw stem Auger OPERATOR: Adrian PROJECT NO.: 4150-CR HAMMER: 140lbs/30in. RIG TYPE: Truck rig (Simco 2800) LOCATION: See Boring Location Map DATE: 12/3/2024

SAMPLES
USCS Symbol
BORING NO.: I-2
Laboratory Testing
Depth (ft)
Sample Type
Blows/ 6 in
Sample Number
Water Content
(%)
Dry Density
(pcf)
Others

MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND COMMENTS

5.5" Asphaltic Concrete over 12" CMB
Alluvium:

Silty CLAY, gray-brown, slightly moist
5 F-c GRAVEL, gray, slightly moist, trace f-c sand, little clay 10 BORING TERMINATED AT 10 FEET
No groundwater encountered
Boring backfilled with excavated materials
15 20
25 30LEGEND
Sample type: ---SPT ---Large Bulk
Lab testing:

EI = Expansion Index SA = Sieve Analysis RV = R-Value Test SH = Shear Test HC= Consolidation MD = Maximum Density
773

APPENDIX B

LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation
Proposed Townhome Residential Development
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, Orange County, California
774

SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING
Classification
Soils were classified visually in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM Test Method D 2487). The soil classifications are shown on the logs of exploratory borings in Appendix A.

Direct Shear
Direct shear testing was performed on remolded samples of the surficial soils according to ASTM Test Method D 3080. The results of these tests are presented in Appendix B.

Expansion Index
The expansion potential of the soils was determined by performing expansion index tests on two representative soil samples from the site in general accordance with ASTM D 4829. The results of these tests are presented in Appendix B.

In Situ Moisture Content and Unit Weight
The field moisture content was measured in the laboratory on selected samples collected during the field investigation. The field moisture content is determined as a percentage of the dry unit weight. The dry density was measured in the laboratory on selected ring samples. The results are shown on the logs of exploratory borings in Appendix A.

Moisture-Density Relationship
Laboratory testing was performed on two representative soil samples collected during the subsurface exploration. The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for the soil type was determined in general accordance with test method ASTM Test Procedure D 1557. The results are included in Appendix B.

Sulfate Content, Resistivity and Chloride Content
Testing to determine the water-soluble sulfate content was performed by others in general accordance with ASTM D4327. Resistivity testing was completed by others in general accordance with ASTM G187.

Testing to determine the chloride content was performed by others in general accordance with ASTM D4327. The results are included in Appendix B.
775
Sample Location:

Date Tested:

Shear Strength: F = 24 O
, C = 291 psf
Notes:
12/12/2024

DIRECT SHEAR TEST
4150-CR
B-1 @ 0-5 Feet
2 - The above reflect direct shear strength at saturated conditions. 1 - The soil specimen used in the shear box was a ring sample remolded to approximately 90% relative compaction from a bulk sample collected during the field investigation.

Project Name: 2375 N. Tustin St.

Project Number:
3 - The tests were run at a shear rate of 0.01 in/min.

0.0 500.0
1000.0
1500.0
2000.0
2500.0
3000.0
3500.0
4000.0

0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 3000.0 3500.0 4000.0 SHEAR STRESS (psf)
NORMAL STRESS (psf)
776
Sample Details
Sample ID: 24-00241-S01 Date Sampled: 12/3/2024
Sampled By:

Material: CLAY
Location: B-1 @ 0-5 Feet
Test Results
ASTM D 1557
Maximum Dry Unit Weight
(lbf/ft³): 116.4
Optimum Water Content (%): 13.1
Method: A
Preparation Method: Moist
Retained Sieve No 4 (4.75mm) (%): 5
Passing Sieve No 4 (4.75mm) (%): 95
Tested By: Eduardo Cuevas
Date Tested: 12/9/2024
ASTM D 4718
Corrected Maximum Dry Unit
Weight (lbf/ft³): 116.4
Corrected Optimum Water
Content (%): 13.1
Sieve Size (Oversize): No 4
Oversize Particles (%): 5
Dry Unit Weight - Water Content Relationship
Proctor Report
Report No: PTR:24-00241-S01
Client:

Project: 4150-CR
Multi-Family Residential Development -
Updated Geotechnical & Infiltration Eval
Phone: (951) 710-1160
GeoTek - Corona
Corona, CA 92880
Fax: (951) 710-1167
1548 N. Maple St.

Melia Homes
Irvine CA 92618
9860 Irvine Center Drive

THIS DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL
CC:

Form No: 110031, Report No: PTR:24-00241-S01 © 2000-2024 QESTLab by SpectraQEST.com Page 1 of 1 Comments
777
Ring #: Ring Dia. : Ring Ht.:1"
Weight of compacted sample & ring (gm)Weight of ring (gm)Net weight of sample (gm)Moisture Content, %Specific Gravity, assumedUnit Wt. of Water @ 20 °C, (pcf)% Saturation EXPANSION INDEX = 88
785.6 23.0

62.449.5 FINAL MOISTURE
Final Weight of wet
sample & tare % Moisture

2.70 12/11/2024 0.9780 Final12.0

SATURATION DETERMINATION
Dry Density, lb / ft3 (D/1.F) 101.8Wet Density, lb / ft3 (C*0.3016) 114.0 12/10/2024 0.8900 10 min/Dry 378.0 12/10/2024 891.0000 Initial

DENSITY DETERMINATION
744.2 READINGS366.2 DATE TIME READING
Sample Description:

4.01"
Project Number: 4150-CR Date Tested: 12/10/2024
Project Location: 2375 N. Tustin St. Sample Source: B-1 @ 0-5 Feet

EXPANSION INDEX TEST
(ASTM D4829)
Client: Melia Homes Tested/ Checked By: JZ Lab No Corona 778
Project X REPORT S241205B
Corrosion Engineering Page 1
Corrosion Control – Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab 29990 Technology Dr, Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 213-928-7213 Fax: 951-226-1720 www.projectxcorrosion.com
Results Only Soil Testing
for
2375 N. Tustin Street
December 6, 2024
Prepared for:

Eddy Cuevas
GeoTek USA
1548 N. Maple Avenue
Corona, CA 92878
[email protected], [email protected]
Project X Job#: S241205B
Client Job or PO#: 4150-CR
Prepared by:

D. Bobrova
Respectfully Submitted,
Eduardo Hernandez, M.Sc., P.E.

Sr. Corrosion Consultant
NACE Corrosion Technologist #16592
Professional Engineer
California No. M37102
[email protected]
779
Project X REPORT S241205B
Corrosion Engineering Page 2
Corrosion Control – Soil, Water, Metallurgy Testing Lab 29990 Technology Dr., Suite 13, Murrieta, CA 92563 Tel: 213-928-7213 Fax: 951-226-1720 www.projectxcorrosion.com
Soil Analysis Lab Results
Client: GeoTek USA
Job Name: 2375 N. Tustin Street
Client Job Number: 4150-CR
Project X Job Number: S241205B
December 6, 2024
Method ASTM
G51
ASTM
G200
SM
4500-D
ASTM
D4327
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D6919
ASTM
D4327
ASTM
D4327
Bore# /
Description
Depth pH Redox Sulfide
S
2- Nitrate
NO3
- Ammonium
NH4
+ Lithium
Li+ SodiumNa+ PotassiumK
+ Magnesium
Mg2+ CalciumCa2+ FluorideF2
2- Phosphate
PO4
3-
(ft) (mg/kg) (wt%) (mg/kg) (wt%) (Ω-cm) (Ω-cm) (mV) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) B1 0-5 144.8 0.0145 18.6 0.0019 1,072 1,005 8.2 123 4.0 6.0 22.1 ND 257.7 49.3 117.7 637.0 8.1 0.5 ASTM
G187
ASTM
D4327
ASTM
D4327
Resistivity
As Rec'd | Minimum
Sulfates
SO4
2- Chlorides
ClCations and Anions, except Sulfide and Bicarbonate, tested with Ion Chromatography mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram (parts per million) of dry soil weight ND = 0 = Not Detected | NT = Not Tested | Unk = Unknown Chemical Analysis performed on 1:3 Soil-To-Water extract PPM = mg/kg (soil) = mg/L (Liquid)
Note: Sometimes a bad sulfate hit is a contaminated spot. Typical fertilizers are Potassium chloride, ammonium sulfate or ammonium sulfate nitrate (ASN). So this is another reason why testing full corrosion series is good because we then have the data to see if those other ingredients are present meaning the soil sample is just fertilizercontaminated soil. This can happen often when the soil samples collected are simply surface scoops. This is why it's best to dig in a foot, throw away the top and test the deeper stuff. Dairy farms are also notorious for these items.

If one sample pops up much more corrosive than all others, we would recommend collecting more samples surrounding the problem sample location to determine if the peak is isolated to it. This allows us to conclude it was a contaminated sample and able to declare it an outlier.

Try out our new online forms: SOIL CORROSIVITY & THERMAL RESISTIVITY LAB REQUEST FORM & IN-SITU WENNER 4 PIN QUOTE REQUEST FORM 780

APPENDIX C

EXPLORATION LOCATION MAP, LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS
AND LABORATORY TEST RESULTS (SCGI, 2005)
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation
Proposed Townhome Residential Development
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, Orange County, California
Project No. 4150-CR
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801

APPENDIX D

INFILTRATION TEST DATA
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation
Proposed Townhome Residential Development
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, Orange County, California
Project No. 4150-CR
802
Project: 4150-CR
Test Hole No.: 12/4/2024
Depth of Hole As Drilled: 120" 120"
Reading
No.

Time
Time
Interval
(Min)
Total
Depth
of Hole
(Inches)
Initial
Water
Level
(Inches)
Final
Water
Level
(Inches)
Δ in Water
Level
(Inches)
Rate
(Minutes
per Inch)
9:00 AM 120 24
9:25 AM 25 7 4/5 16 1/5
9:26 AM 120 24
9:51 AM 25 8 2/5 15 3/5
9:52 AM 120 24
10:02 AM 10 15 3/5 8 2/5
10:03 AM 120 24
10:13 AM 10 15 3/5 8 2/5
10:14 AM 120 24
10:24 AM 10 16 1/5 7 4/5
10:25 AM 120 24
10:35 AM 10 16 1/5 7 4/5
10:36 AM 120 24
10:46 AM 10 16 4/5 7 1/5
10:47 AM 120 24
10:57 AM 10 16 4/5 7 1/5
Before Test: 120" After Test:

PERCOLATION DATA SHEET
2375 N Tustin St Job No.:

I-1 Tested By: KLP Date:
1 1.5
presoaked
Comments
2 1.6
1 1.2
2 1.2
3 1.3
4 1.3
5 1.4
6 1.4
803
Project: 4150-CR
Test Hole No.: 12/4/2024
Depth of Hole As Drilled: 120" 120"
Reading
No.

Time
Time
Interval
(Min)
Total
Depth
of Hole
(Inches)
Initial
Water
Level
(Inches)
Final
Water
Level
(Inches)
Δ in Water
Level
(Inches)
Rate
(Minutes
per Inch)
7:00 AM 120 24
7:25 AM 25 18 6
7:26 AM 120 24
7:51 AM 25 18 6
7:52 AM 120 24
8:02 AM 10 21 3/5 2 2/5
8:03 AM 120 24
8:13 AM 10 22 2
8:14 AM 120 24
8:24 AM 10 22 1/5 1 4/5
8:25 AM 120 24
8:35 AM 10 22 1/5 1 4/5
8:36 AM 120 24
8:46 AM 10 22 4/5 1 1/5
8:47 AM 120 24
8:57 AM 10 22 4/5 1 1/5
6 8.3
4 5.6
5 8.3
2 5.0
3 5.6
2 4.2
1 4.2
1 4.2
presoaked
Comments

PERCOLATION DATA SHEET
2375 N Tustin St Job No.:

I-2 Tested By: KLP Date:

Before Test: 120" After Test:
804
Equation - I
t =
Havg = (HO+HF)/2 =
It = Inches per Hour
Time Interval, Δt = 10
Client: Melia Homes
Project: 2375 N Tustin St
Project No: 4150-CR
Date: 12/4/2024
Boring No. I-1
Percolation to Infiltration Rate (Porchet Method)
Final Depth to Water, DF = 103.2
Test Hole Radius, r = 4
Initial Depth to Water, DO = 96

3.86 Total Test Hole Depth, DT = 120
ΔH (60r)
Δt (r+2Havg)
HO = DT - DO = 24
HF = DT - DF = 16.8
ΔH = ΔD = HO- HF = 7.2

20.4 805
Equation - I
t =
Havg = (HO+HF)/2 =
It = 0.57 Inches per Hour
Total Test Hole Depth, DT = 120
ΔH (60r)
Δt (r+2Havg)
HO = DT - DO = 24
HF = DT - DF = 22.8
ΔH = ΔD = HO- HF = 1.2

23.4 Final Depth to Water, DF = 97.2
Test Hole Radius, r = 4
Initial Depth to Water, DO = 96
Time Interval, Δt = 10
Client: Melia Homes
Project: 2375 N Tustin St
Project No: 4150-CR
Date: 12/4/2024
Boring No. I-2
Percolation to Infiltration Rate (Porchet Method)
806

APPENDIX E

GENERAL EARTHWORK GRADING GUIDELINES
Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation
Proposed Townhome Residential Development
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, Orange County, California
Project No. 4150-CR
807

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX E
2375 North Tustin Street Page E-1
Orange, Orange County, California Project No. 4150-CR

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES
Guidelines presented herein are intended to address general construction procedures for earthwork construction. Specific situations and conditions often arise which cannot reasonably be discussed in general guidelines, when anticipated these are discussed in the text of the report. Often unanticipated conditions are encountered which may necessitate modification or changes to these guidelines. It is our hope that these will assist the contractor to more efficiently complete the project by providing a reasonable understanding of the procedures that would be expected during earthwork and the testing and observation used to evaluate those procedures.

General
Grading should be performed to at least the minimum requirements of governing agencies, Chapters 18 and 33 of the Uniform Building Code, CBC (2022) and the guidelines presented below.

Preconstruction Meeting
A preconstruction meeting should be held prior to site earthwork. Any questions the contractor has regarding our recommendations, general site conditions, apparent discrepancies between reported and actual conditions and/or differences in procedures the contractor intends to use should be brought up at that meeting. The contractor (including the main onsite representative) should review our report and these guidelines in advance of the meeting. Any comments the contractor may have regarding these guidelines should be brought up at that meeting.

Grading Observation and Testing

1. Observation of the fill placement should be provided by our representative during grading.

Verbal communication during the course of each day will be used to inform the contractor of test results. The contractor should receive a copy of the "Daily Field Report" indicating results of field density tests that day. If our representative does not provide the contractor with these reports, our office should be notified.

2. Testing and observation procedures are, by their nature, specific to the work or area observed and location of the tests taken, variability may occur in other locations. The contractor is responsible for the uniformity of the grading operations; our observations and test results are intended to evaluate the contractor’s overall level of efforts during grading. The contractor’s personnel are the only individuals participating in all aspects of site work. Compaction testing and observation should not be considered as relieving the contractor’s responsibility to properly compact the fill.

3. Cleanouts, processed ground to receive fill, key excavations, and subdrains should be observed by our representative prior to placing any fill. It will be the contractor's responsibility to notify our representative or office when such areas are ready for observation. 808

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX E
2375 North Tustin Street Page E-2
Orange, Orange County, California Project No. 4150-CR

4. Density tests may be done on the surface material to receive fill, as considered warranted by this firm.

5. In general, density tests would be made at maximum intervals of two feet of fill height, or every 1,000 cubic yards of fill placed. Criteria will vary depending on soil conditions and size of the fill.

More frequent testing may be performed. In any case, an adequate number of field density tests should be made to evaluate the required compaction and moisture content is generally being obtained.

6. Laboratory testing to support field test procedures will be performed, as considered warranted, based on conditions encountered (e.g. change of material sources, types, etc.) Every effort will be made to process samples in the laboratory as quickly as possible and in progress construction projects are our first priority. However, laboratory workloads may cause delays and some soils may require a minimum of 48 to 72 hours to complete test procedures. Whenever possible, our representative(s) should be informed in advance of operational changes that might result in different source areas for materials.

7. Procedures for testing of fill slopes are as follows:
a) Density tests should be taken periodically during grading on the flat surface of the fill, three to five feet horizontally from the face of the slope. b) If a method other than over building and cutting back to the compacted core is to be employed, slope compaction testing during construction should include testing the outer six inches to three feet in the slope face to determine if the required compaction is being achieved.

8. Finish grade testing of slopes and pad surfaces should be performed after construction is complete.

Site Clearing

1. All vegetation, and other deleterious materials, should be removed from the site. If material is not immediately removed from the site it should be stockpiled in a designated area(s) well outside of all current work areas and delineated with flagging or other means. Site clearing should be performed in advance of any grading in a specific area.

2. Efforts should be made by the contractor to remove all organic or other deleterious material from the fill, as even the most diligent efforts may result in the incorporation of some materials.

This is especially important when grading is occurring near the natural grade. All equipment operators should be aware of these efforts. Laborers may be required as root pickers.

3. Nonorganic debris or concrete may be placed in deeper fill areas provided the procedures used are observed and found acceptable by our representative. 809

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX E
2375 North Tustin Street Page E-3
Orange, Orange County, California Project No. 4150-CR
Treatment of Existing Ground

1. Following site clearing, all surficial deposits of alluvium and colluvium as well as weathered or creep effected bedrock, should be removed unless otherwise specifically indicated in the text of this report.

2. In some cases, removal may be recommended to a specified depth (e.g. flat sites where partial alluvial removals may be sufficient). The contractor should not exceed these depths unless directed otherwise by our representative.

3. Groundwater existing in alluvial areas may make excavation difficult. Deeper removals than indicated in the text of the report may be necessary due to saturation during winter months.

4. Subsequent to removals, the natural ground should be processed to a depth of six inches, moistened to near optimum moisture conditions and compacted to fill standards.

5. Exploratory backhoe or dozer trenches still remaining after site removal should be excavated and filled with compacted fill if they can be located.

Fill Placement

1. Unless otherwise indicated, all site soil and bedrock may be reused for compacted fill; however, some special processing or handling may be required (see text of report).

2. Material used in the compacting process should be evenly spread, moisture conditioned, processed, and compacted in thin lifts six (6) to eight (8) inches in compacted thickness to obtain a uniformly dense layer. The fill should be placed and compacted on a nearly horizontal plane, unless otherwise found acceptable by our representative.

3. If the moisture content or relative density varies from that recommended by this firm, the contractor should rework the fill until it is in accordance with the following:
a) The moisture content of the fill should be at or above optimum moisture. Moisture should be evenly distributed without wet and dry pockets. Pre-watering of cut or removal areas should be considered in addition to watering during fill placement, particularly in clay or dry surficial soils. The ability of the contractor to obtain the proper moisture content will control production rates.
b) Each six-inch layer should be compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density in compliance with the testing method specified by the controlling governmental agency. In most cases, the testing method is ASTM Test Designation D 1557.

4. Rock fragments less than eight inches in diameter may be utilized in the fill, provided:
a) They are not placed in concentrated pockets;
b) There is a sufficient percentage of fine-grained material to surround the rocks; c) The distribution of the rocks is observed by, and acceptable to, our representative. 810

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX E
2375 North Tustin Street Page E-4
Orange, Orange County, California Project No. 4150-CR

5. Rocks exceeding eight (8) inches in diameter should be taken off site, broken into smaller fragments, or placed in accordance with recommendations of this firm in areas designated suitable for rock disposal. On projects where significant large quantities of oversized materials are anticipated, alternate guidelines for placement may be included. If significant oversize materials are encountered during construction, these guidelines should be requested.

6. In clay soil, dry or large chunks or blocks are common. If in excess of eight (8) inches minimum dimension, then they are considered as oversized. Sheepsfoot compactors or other suitable methods should be used to break up blocks. When dry, they should be moisture conditioned to provide a uniform condition with the surrounding fill.

Slope Construction

1. The contractor should obtain a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent out to the finished slope face of fill slopes. This may be achieved by either overbuilding the slope and cutting back to the compacted core, or by direct compaction of the slope face with suitable equipment.

2. Slopes trimmed to the compacted core should be overbuilt by at least three (3) feet with compaction efforts out to the edge of the false slope. Failure to properly compact the outer edge results in trimming not exposing the compacted core and additional compaction after trimming may be necessary.

3. If fill slopes are built "at grade" using direct compaction methods, then the slope construction should be performed so that a constant gradient is maintained throughout construction. Soil should not be "spilled" over the slope face nor should slopes be "pushed out" to obtain grades.

Compaction equipment should compact each lift along the immediate top of slope. Slopes should be back rolled or otherwise compacted at approximately every 4 feet vertically as the slope is built.

4. Corners and bends in slopes should have special attention during construction as these are the most difficult areas to obtain proper compaction.

5. Cut slopes should be cut to the finished surface. Excessive undercutting and smoothing of the face with fill may necessitate stabilization.

UTILITY TRENCH CONSTRUCTION AND BACKFILL
Utility trench excavation and backfill is the contractor’s responsibility. The geotechnical consultant typically provides periodic observation and testing of these operations. While efforts are made to make sufficient observations and tests to verify that the contractors’ methods and procedures are adequate to achieve proper compaction, it is typically impractical to observe all backfill procedures. As such, it is critical that the contractor use consistent backfill procedures. 811

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX E
2375 North Tustin Street Page E-5
Orange, Orange County, California Project No. 4150-CR
Compaction methods vary for trench compaction and experience indicates many methods can be successful. However, procedures that “worked” on previous projects may or may not prove effective on a given site. The contractor(s) should outline the procedures proposed, so that we may discuss them prior to construction. We will offer comments based on our knowledge of site conditions and experience.

1. Utility trench backfill in slopes, structural areas, in streets and beneath flat work or hardscape should be brought to at least optimum moisture and compacted to at least 90 percent of the laboratory standard. Soil should be moisture conditioned prior to placing in the trench.

2. Flooding and jetting are not typically recommended or acceptable for native soils. Flooding or jetting may be used with select sand having a Sand Equivalent (SE) of 30 or higher. This is typically limited to the following uses:
a) shallow (12 + inches) under slab interior trenches and, b) as bedding in pipe zone.

The water should be allowed to dissipate prior to pouring slabs or completing trench compaction.

3. Care should be taken not to place soils at high moisture content within the upper three feet of the trench backfill in street areas, as overly wet soils may impact subgrade preparation.

Moisture may be reduced to 2% below optimum moisture in areas to be paved within the upper three feet below sub grade.

4. Sand backfill should not be allowed in exterior trenches adjacent to and within an area extending below a 1:1 projection from the outside bottom edge of a footing, unless it is similar to the surrounding soil.

5. Trench compaction testing is generally at the discretion of the geotechnical consultant. Testing frequency will be based on trench depth and the contractors’ procedures. A probing rod would be used to assess the consistency of compaction between tested areas and untested areas. If zones are found that are considered less compact than other areas, this should be brought to the contractor’s attention.

JOB SAFETY
General
Personnel safety is a primary concern on all job sites. The following summaries are safety considerations for use by all our employees on multi-employer construction sites. On ground personnel are at the highest risk of injury and possible fatality on grading construction projects. The company recognizes that construction activities will vary on each site and that job site safety is the contractor's responsibility.

However, it is imperative that all personnel be safety conscious to avoid accidents and potential injury. 812

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX E
2375 North Tustin Street Page E-6
Orange, Orange County, California Project No. 4150-CR
In an effort to minimize risks associated with geotechnical testing and observation, the following precautions are to be implemented for the safety of our field personnel on grading and construction projects.

1. Safety Meetings: Our field personnel are directed to attend the contractor's regularly scheduled safety meetings.

2. Safety Vests: Safety vests are provided for and are to be worn by our personnel while on the job site.

3. Safety Flags: Safety flags are provided to our field technicians; one is to be affixed to the vehicle when on site, the other is to be placed atop the spoil pile on all test pits.

In the event that the contractor's representative observes any of our personnel not following the above, we request that it be brought to the attention of our office.

Test Pits Location, Orientation and Clearance
The technician is responsible for selecting test pit locations. The primary concern is the technician's safety. However, it is necessary to take sufficient tests at various locations to obtain a representative sampling of the fill. As such, efforts will be made to coordinate locations with the grading contractors authorized representatives (e.g. dump man, operator, supervisor, grade checker, etc.), and to select locations following or behind the established traffic pattern, preferably outside of current traffic. The contractors authorized representative should direct excavation of the pit and safety during the test period. Again, safety is the paramount concern.

Test pits should be excavated so that the spoil pile is placed away from oncoming traffic. The technician's vehicle is to be placed next to the test pit, opposite the spoil pile. This necessitates that the fill be maintained in a drivable condition. Alternatively, the contractor may opt to park a piece of equipment in front of test pits, particularly in small fill areas or those with limited access.

A zone of non-encroachment should be established for all test pits (see diagram below). No grading equipment should enter this zone during the test procedure. The zone should extend outward to the sides approximately 50 feet from the center of the test pit and 100 feet in the direction of traffic flow.

This zone is established both for safety and to avoid excessive ground vibration, which typically decreases test results.
813

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX E
2375 North Tustin Street Page E-7
Orange, Orange County, California Project No. 4150-CR
50 ft Zone of
Non-Encroachment
50 ft Zone of
Non-Encroachment
Traffic Direction
Vehicle
parked here Test Pit Spoil
pile
Spoil
pile
Test Pit

SIDE VIEW

PLAN VIEW

TEST PIT SAFETY PLAN
10 0 ft Zone of
Non-Encroachment
Slope Tests
When taking slope tests, the technician should park their vehicle directly above or below the test location on the slope. The contractor's representative should effectively keep all equipment at a safe operation distance (e.g. 50 feet) away from the slope during testing.

The technician is directed to withdraw from the active portion of the fill as soon as possible following testing. The technician's vehicle should be parked at the perimeter of the fill in a highly visible location.

Trench Safety
It is the contractor's responsibility to provide safe access into trenches where compaction testing is needed. Trenches for all utilities should be excavated in accordance with CAL-OSHA and any other applicable safety standards. Safe conditions will be required to enable compaction testing of the trench backfill.

All utility trench excavations in excess of 5 feet deep, which a person enters, are to be shored or laid back. Trench access should be provided in accordance with OSHA standards. Our personnel are directed not to enter any trench by being lowered or "riding down" on the equipment.

Our personnel are directed not to enter any excavation which;

1. is 5 feet or deeper unless shored or laid back,

2. exit points or ladders are not provided,

3. displays any evidence of instability, has any loose rock or other debris which could fall into the trench, or
814

GENERAL GRADING GUIDELINES APPENDIX E
2375 North Tustin Street Page E-8
Orange, Orange County, California Project No. 4150-CR

4. displays any other evidence of any unsafe conditions regardless of depth.

If the contractor fails to provide safe access to trenches for compaction testing, our company policy requires that the soil technician withdraws and notifies their supervisor. The contractor’s representative will then be contacted in an effort to effect a solution. All backfill not tested due to safety concerns or other reasons is subject to reprocessing and/or removal.

Procedures
In the event that the technician's safety is jeopardized or compromised as a result of the contractor's failure to comply with any of the above, the technician is directed to inform both the developer's and contractor's representatives. If the condition is not rectified, the technician is required, by company policy, to immediately withdraw and notify their supervisor. The contractor’s representative will then be contacted in an effort to affect a solution. No further testing will be performed until the situation is rectified. Any fill placed in the interim can be considered unacceptable and subject to reprocessing, recompaction or removal.

In the event that the soil technician does not comply with the above or other established safety guidelines, we request that the contractor bring this to the technician’s attention and notify our project manager or office. Effective communication and coordination between the contractors' representative and the field technician(s) is strongly encouraged in order to implement the above safety program and safety in general.

The safety procedures outlined above should be discussed at the contractor's safety meetings. This will serve to inform and remind equipment operators of these safety procedures, particularly the zone of non-encroachment.

The safety procedures outlined above should be discussed at the contractor's safety meetings. This will serve to inform and remind equipment operators of these safety procedures, particularly the zone of non-encroachment.
815
Appendix E: Paleontological Resources Assessment
816

PALEONTOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR
THE 2375 NORTH TUSTIN STREET

PROJECT

CITY OF ORANGE,

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
APNs 372-642-31 and -32
Prepared on Behalf of:

RE Consulting
5742 Calle Polvorosa
San Clemente, California 92673
Prepared for:

City of Orange
300 East Chapman Avenue
Orange, California 92866
Prepared by:

BFSA Environmental Services,
a Perennial Company
14010 Poway Road, Suite A
Poway, California 92064
April 21, 2025
817
Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project Paleontological Database Information
Author: Todd A. Wirths, M.S., P.G., Principal Paleontologist, California Professional Geologist No. 7588
Prepared by: BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company 14010 Poway Road, Suite A
Poway, California 92064
Report Date: April 21, 2025
Report Title: Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project, City of Orange, Orange County, California
Prepared on Behalf of: RE Consulting
5742 Calle Polvorosa
San Clemente, California 92673
Prepared for: City of Orange
300 East Chapman Avenue
Orange, California 92866
Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 372-642-31 and -32
USGS Quadrangle: Unsectioned area of Township 4 South, Range 9 West, on the USGS Orange, California (7.5-minute) Quadrangle
Study Area: 5.04 acres
Key Words: Paleontological assessment; Holocene young alluvial fan deposits; low sensitivity; monitoring not recommended.
818
Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project Table of Contents
Section Page
I. INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION........................................................................1 II. REGULATORY SETTING ........................................................................................1 The City of Orange......................................................................................................5 III. GEOLOGY..................................................................................................................5 IV. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES......................................................................7 Definition ....................................................................................................................7 Paleontological Resource Records Search.................................................................7 V. PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY ....................................................................7 Overview .....................................................................................................................7 Professional Standards...............................................................................................8 VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................8 VII. CERTIFICATION ......................................................................................................9 VIII. REFERENCES ...........................................................................................................9 Appendices
Appendix A – Qualifications of Key Personnel
List of Figures
Figure Page
Figure 1 General Location Map .................................................................................2 Figure 2 Project Location Map...................................................................................3 Figure 3 Development Map........................................................................................4 Figure 4 Geologic Map...............................................................................................6 819
Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project 1 I. INTRODUCTION AND LOCATION
A paleontological resource assessment has been completed for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City of Orange environmental requirements. The project is located at 2375 North Tustin Street between North Tustin Street and State Route 55, east of The Village At Orange shopping mall, in the city of Orange, California (Figures 1 and 2). The 5.04‐acre project consists of two parcels (Assessor’s Parcel Numbers [APNs] 372-642-31 and -32) and is situated within an unsectioned area of Township 4 South, Range 9 West, as shown on the United States Geological Survey Orange, California (7.5-minute) topographic quadrangle map (see Figure 2). A new residential development is being considered for the project parcels (Figure 3). The project parcels are completely developed, currently occupied by a 45,000-square-foot one-story retail building (Best Buy) and adjacent parking/drive lane/hardscape/landscape improvements. The current development is planned for demolition as part of the project.

For grading at the project, Hick and LaMont (2024) recommended that the soils be removed beneath the planned building footprints to a depth of at least five feet below existing grades, or three feet below the base of the proposed foundations, whichever is greater. All undocumented fill soils were recommended for removal as part of remedial grading. Hick and LaMont (2024) noted that deeper artificial fills may be present within the site and accordingly would require deeper removals.

As the lead agency, the City of Orange has required the preparation of a paleontological assessment to evaluate the project’s potential to yield paleontological resources. The paleontological assessment of the project included a review of paleontological literature and fossil locality records in the area, a review of the underlying geology, and, if necessary, recommendations to mitigate impacts to potential paleontological resources. A paleontological survey of the project was not performed, since the parcels are completely developed.

II. REGULATORY SETTING
CEQA, which is patterned after the National Environmental Policy Act, is the overriding regulation that sets the requirement for protecting California’s cultural and paleontological resources. CEQA does not establish specific rules that must be followed but mandates that governing permitting agencies (lead agencies) set their own guidelines for the protection of nonrenewable paleontological resources under their jurisdiction.

Under “Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act,” as amended in December 2018 (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections 15000 et seq.), procedures define the types of activities, persons, and public agencies required to comply with CEQA. Section 15063 of the CCR provides a process by which a lead agency may review a project’s potential impact on the environment, assess whether the impacts are significant, and if necessary, provide recommendations. 820
821
822
823
Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project 5 The City of Orange
The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the City of Orange recognizes that paleontological resources may be adversely impacted as a result of earth disturbance activities during development projects (City of Orange 2010). The EIR indicates the potential to encounter paleontological resources exists and has proposed a mitigation measure (MM; MM 5.5-10) as a requirement to implement prior to development. The MM, while only indicating cultural and archeological resources, is positioned under a heading with paleontological resources in the EIR, and is stated below:

5.5-10 Require cultural resources inventories of all new development projects in areas identified with medium or high potential for archaeological or cultural resources. Where a preliminary site survey finds medium to high potential for substantial archaeological remains, the City shall require a mitigation plan to protect the resource before issuance of permits. Mitigation may include:
• Ensuring that a qualified archaeologist is present during initial grading or trenching (monitoring);
• Redesigning the project to avoid archaeological resources (this is considered the strongest tool for preserving archaeological resources); • Capping the site with a layer of fill; and/or
• Excavating and removing the archaeological resources (recovery) and implementing curation in an appropriate facility under the direction of a qualified archaeologist (interpretation).

Alert applicants for permits within early settlement areas to the potential sensitivity.

If significant archaeological resources are discovered during construction or grading activities, such activities shall cease in the immediate area of the find until a qualified archaeologist can determine the significance of the resource and recommend alternative mitigation.

III. GEOLOGY
Geologically, the project is mapped as Holocene and late Pleistocene young alluvial fan deposits (yellow areas labeled “Qyfsa” on Figure 4, after Morton and Miller 2006), mostly consisting of unconsolidated, alluvial silty sands. Nearby are late to middle Pleistocene-aged old alluvial fan deposits, characterized as moderately- to well-consolidated silt, sand, and gravel (amber areas labeled “Qof” on Figure 4). According to a project-specific geotechnical report (Hick and LaMont 2024), artificial fill soils cover the project, ranging from three to as much as five and a half feet thick. Below fill soils are alluvium, consisting of interbedded layers of clay, clayey sand, silty sands and fine to coarse gravel.
824
825
Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project 7 IV. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Definition
Paleontological resources are the remains of prehistoric life that have been preserved in geologic strata. These remains are called fossils and include bones, shells, teeth, and plant remains (including their impressions, casts, and molds) in the sedimentary matrix, as well as trace fossils such as footprints and burrows. Fossils are considered older than 5,000 years of age (Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 2010) but may include younger remains (subfossils) when viewed in the context of local extinction of the organism or habitat. Fossils are considered a nonrenewable resource under state and local guidelines (see Section II of this report).

Paleontological Resource Records Search
A prior paleontological resource (fossil) records search was performed for a nearby project by the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM) (Bell 2025), located one mile west of the current project. The closest fossil locality is located just over two miles northwest of the 2375 North Tustin Street Project, south of Lincoln Avenue along Rio Vista Avenue, consisting of wild sheep remains in Pleistocene deposits (LACM locality [loc.] 1652). Between two and three miles to the northeast, proboscidean bones were found in Pleistocene terrace deposits (LACM loc. 3292). A third locality, with Pleistocene rodent remains, is several miles away at the former El Toro marine base (LACM loc. 7867).

A review of published and unpublished literature was conducted for potential paleontological resources that are known in the vicinity of the project. Data reported in Miller (1971) indicate there are no nearby fossil localities; however, Jefferson (1991) lists a late Pleistocene-aged specimen of horse located at “Glasell [Street] and Fletcher [Avenue]” in Orange (LACM locality 4943), which would place this locality one mile west of the project. Dr. Alyssa Bell (personal communication 2025) of the LACM indicated this specimen “has been assessed as a modern specimen since Jefferson's publication and so is no longer included in records searches.” The geology at this intersection is mapped as young alluvial fan deposits (see Figure 4).

V. PALEONTOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY
Overview
The degree of paleontological sensitivity of any particular area is based upon a number of factors, including the documented presence of fossiliferous resources on a site or in nearby areas, the presence of documented fossils within a particular geologic formation or lithostratigraphic unit, and whether or not the original depositional environment of the sediments is one that might have been conducive to an accumulation of organic remains that may have become fossilized over time.

Holocene alluvium is generally considered to be geologically too young to contain significant nonrenewable paleontological resources (i.e., fossils) and is therefore typically assigned a low paleontological sensitivity. Pleistocene (greater than 11,700 years old) alluvial and terrace 826
Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project 8 deposits in the Orange County region, however, often yield important Ice Age terrestrial vertebrate fossils such as extinct mammoths, mastodons, giant ground sloths, extinct species of horse, bison, and camel, saber-toothed cats, and others (Jefferson 1991). Therefore, these Pleistocene sediments are accorded a high paleontological resource sensitivity.

Professional Standards
The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010) has drafted guidelines that include four categories of paleontological sensitivity for geologic units (formations) that might be impacted by a proposed project, as paraphrased below:
• High Potential: Rock units from which vertebrate or significant invertebrate, plant, or trace fossils have been recovered.
• Undetermined Potential: Rock units for which little information is available concerning their paleontological content, geologic age, and depositional environment, and that further study is needed to determine the potential of the rock unit. • Low Potential: Rock units that are poorly represented by fossil specimens in institutional collections or based on a general scientific consensus that only preserve fossils in rare circumstances.
• No Potential: Rock units that have no potential to contain significant paleontological resources, such as high-grade metamorphic rocks and plutonic igneous rocks.

Based upon these criteria, the Holocene to late Pleistocene-aged young alluvial fan deposits have a low potential at/near the surface.

VI. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In conclusion, the recommended grading depths at the proposed project will only impact artificial fill soils and Holocene alluvial fan deposits. These deposits have a low paleontological sensitivity. Therefore, paleontological monitoring is not recommended at the project. 827
Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project 9 VII. CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this paleontological report, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and have been compiled in accordance with CEQA criteria.

April 21, 2025
Todd A. Wirths, M.S., P.G. Date
Principal Paleontologist
California Professional Geologist No. 7588
VIII. REFERENCES
Bell, A. 2025. Paleontological resources records search for the 2411 North Glassell Street Project.

Unpublished letter for BFSA Environmental Services, Poway, California, by the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, California.

City of Orange. 2010. Program Environmental Impact Report, City of Orange General Plan, State Clearinghouse # 2006031117. Prepared for the city of Orange, California, by EDAW, Inc., San Diego, California.
https://www.cityoforange.org/home/showpublisheddocument/240/637698173340500000.

Hick, B.A., and LaMont, E.H. 2024. Updated Geotechnical and Infiltration Evaluation, Proposed Townhome Residential Development, 2375 North Tustin Street, Orange, Orange County, California. Prepared for Melia Homes, Irvine, California, by GeoTek, Inc., Corona, California.

Jefferson, G.T. 1991. A catalogue of late Quaternary vertebrates from California: Part two, mammals. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Technical Reports, no. 7: i-v + 1-129.

Miller, W.E. 1971. Pleistocene vertebrates of the Los Angeles Basin and vicinity (exclusive of Rancho La Brea). Bulletin of the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History; Science, Number 10, 124 pp.

Morton, D.M. and Miller, F.K. 2006. Geologic map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30' x 60' quadrangles, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 06-1217, scale 1:100,000.
828
Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project 10 Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2010. Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources; by the SVP Impact Mitigation Guidelines Revision Committee: https://vertpaleo.org/wpcontent/uploads/2021/01/SVP_Impact_Mitigation_Guidelines.pdf. 829
Paleontological Assessment for the 2375 North Tustin Street Project

APPENDIX A
Qualifications of Key Personnel
830
Todd A. Wirths, MS, PG No. 7588
Principal Paleontologist
BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company
14010 Poway Road  Suite A 
Phone: (858) 679-8218  Fax: (858) 679-9896  Email: [email protected] Education
Master of Science, Geological Sciences, San Diego State University, California 1995 Bachelor of Arts, Earth Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz 1992 Professional Certifications
California Professional Geologist #7588, 2003
Riverside County Approved Paleontologist
San Diego County Qualified Paleontologist
Orange County Certified Paleontologist
OSHA HAZWOPER 40-hour trained; current 8-hour annual refresher Professional Memberships
Board member, San Diego Geological Society
San Diego Association of Geologists; past President (2012) and Vice President (2011) South Coast Geological Society
Southern California Paleontological Society
Experience
Mr. Wirths has more than a dozen years of professional experience as a senior-level paleontologist throughout southern California. He is also a certified California Professional Geologist. At BFSA, Mr.

Wirths conducts on-site paleontological monitoring, trains and supervises junior staff, and performs all research and reporting duties for locations throughout Los Angeles, Ventura, San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, San Diego, and Imperial Counties. Mr. Wirths was formerly a senior project manager conducting environmental investigations and remediation projects for petroleum hydrocarbonimpacted sites across southern California.

Selected Recent Reports
2019 Paleontological Assessment for the 10575 Foothill Boulevard Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning, Inc. Report on file at Brian F.

Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2019 Paleontological Assessment for the MorningStar Marguerite Project, Mission Viejo, Orange County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
831
BFSA Environmental Services, a Perennial Company, 2
2019 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Nimitz Crossing Project, City of San Diego. Prepared for Voltaire 24, LP. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2019 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program (PRIMP) for the Jack Rabbit Trail Logistics Center Project, City of Beaumont, Riverside County, California. Prepared for JRT BP 1, LLC.

Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2020 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Oceanside Beachfront Resort Project, Oceanside, San California. Prepared for S.D. Malkin Properties. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program for the Nakase Project, Lake Forest, Orange County, San California. Prepared for Glenn Lukos Associates, Inc. Report on file at Brian F.

Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program for the Sunset Crossroads Project, Banning, Riverside County. Prepared for NP Banning Industrial, LLC. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Assessment for the Ortega Plaza Project, Lake Elsinore, Riverside County.

Prepared for Empire Design Group. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Resource Record Search Update for the Green River Ranch III Project, Green River Ranch Specific Plan SP00-001, City of Corona, California. Prepared for Western Realco. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2020 Paleontological Assessment for the Cypress/Slover Industrial Center Project, City of Fontana, San Bernardino County, California. Prepared for T&B Planning, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2020 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Imperial Landfill Expansion Project (Phase VI, Segment C-2), Imperial County, California. Prepared for Republic Services, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2021 Paleontological Assessment for the Manitou Court Logistics Center Project, City of Jurupa Valley, Riverside County, California. Prepared for Link Industrial. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2021 Paleontological Resource Impact Mitigation Program for the Del Oro (Tract 36852) Project, Menifee, Riverside County. Prepared for D.R. Horton. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
2021 Paleontological Assessment for the Alessandro Corporate Center Project (Planning Case PR-2020- 000519), City of Riverside, Riverside County, California. Prepared for OZI Alessandro, LLC.

Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California. 2021 Paleontological Monitoring Report for the Boardwalk Project, La Jolla, City of San Diego.

Prepared for Project Management Advisors, Inc. Report on file at Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc., Poway, California.
832
Appendix F: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
833

PHASE I

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

VACANT COMMERCIAL RETAIL BUILDING
2375 NORTH TUSTIN STREET
ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92865
EDI Project No. 224-0059
February 6, 2024
Prepared for:
2050 MAIN STREET, SUITE #300
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614
3722 S. Las Vegas Blvd
Suite 1210
Las Vegas, NV 89158
Phone: (702) 278-4901
Fax: (702) 925-4138
834
February 6, 2024
Mr. Matt Casserly
SVP/ Relationship Manager
Sunwest Bank
2050 Main Street, Suite #300
Irvine, California 92614
Tel: (949) 233-3628
Email: [email protected]
Re: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Vacant Commercial Retail Building
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California 92865
EDI Project No. 224-0059
Dear Mr. Casserly:

Pursuant to our agreement dated January 23, 2024, EDI Consultants, Inc. ("EDI") has conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the above referenced property conforming to the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard E 1527-21. The findings of this assessment are based upon a visual reconnaissance of the Subject Property, interviews with relevant personnel, limited observations of surrounding properties, and a records review including regulatory databases and historical use information. Any exception to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Sections 2.0-2.4 of this report.

The purpose of this Report is to assist Sunwest Bank in its underwriting of a proposed mortgage loan on the Subject Property described herein.

This report was prepared for and may be relied upon by Sunwest Bank and its participants, lenders, affiliates, successors, and assigns (collectively, “The Client”) with respect to any loan(s) placed on the property described in the report. Any rating agency, issuer or purchaser of any security collateralized or otherwise backed by such loan(s), any servicer (and their collective successors and assigns), any underwriter co-underwriting any such securities, and any institutional provider(s) of any liquidity or credit support for such financings may also rely upon the report. The Client may, at its option, elect to include the report in its entirety in the offering memorandum or other disclosure materials relating to the Securitization (as defined below). We also consent to the inclusion of this report in its entirety in any form, whether in paper or digital format, including any electronic media or the internet, in any Prospectus Supplement or other offering document relating to any "Securitization" (defined as an offering of debt securities that, as applicable, are registered with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended [the “Act”], or are privately placed pursuant to an exemption from the Act, in which the property reported upon may be part of a pool of properties owned by various non-affiliated owners collateralizing such offering) and the filing, if applicable, and the dissemination thereof, and we consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in such Prospectus Supplement or other offering document, at The Client's discretion. 3722 S. Las Vegas Blvd, Suite 1210 | Las Vegas, NV 89158 | TEL: (702) 278-4901 | FAX: (702) 925-4138 | edi-consultants.com 835

CERTIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS AND STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE This report has been prepared by the staff of EDI for Sunwest Bank under the professional supervision of the principal and/or senior staff whose seal(s) and signatures appear hereon. Neither EDI, nor any staff member, has any interest or contemplated interest, financial or otherwise, in the subject or surrounding properties, or in any entity that owns, leases, or occupies the subject or surrounding properties or that may be responsible for environmental issues identified during the course of this investigation, and has no personal bias with respect to the parties involved.

The information contained in this report has received appropriate technical review and approval. The conclusions represent professional judgments and are founded upon the findings of the assessments identified in the report and the interpretation of such data based on our experience and expertise according to the existing standard of care. No other warranty or limitation exists, either expressed or implied.

The report was prepared in accordance with Sunwest Bank's Phase I Environmental Site Assessment scope of work and the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard E 1527-21 for the use and benefit of Sunwest Bank, it's successors, and assignees. It is based, in part, upon documents, writings, and information owned, possessed, or secured by Sunwest Bank. Neither this report, nor any information contained herein shall be used or relied upon for any purpose by any other person or entity without the express written permission of Sunwest Bank.

Report prepared by:

EDI Consultants
Darrin Domingo, REPA, CHMM
Registered Environmental Property Assessor – No. 642775 Certified Hazardous Materials Manager – No. 11546
3722 S. Las Vegas Blvd, Suite 1210 | Las Vegas, NV 89158 | TEL: (702) 278-4901 | FAX: (702) 925-4138 | edi-consultants.com 836
Project Summary
Report Section NFA
Routine
Solution REC HREC CREC OEC
De
Minimis Recommendations
USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 
PAST USES OF SUBJECT PROPERTY  

PAST USES OF ADJOINING
PROPERTIES 

PAST USES OF SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES 
PCB CONTAINING EQUIPMENT 
CATCH BASINS OR DRY WELLS 
VAPOR ENCROACHMENT CONDITION 
NON-ASTM STANDARD OBSERVATIONS 

SUBJECT PROPERTY REGULATORY
REVIEW  

ADJACENT AND SURROUNDING
PROPERTIES REGULATORY REVIEW 
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
Page i
837

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.1 OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.1.1 RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (RECs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.1.2 CONTROLLED RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (CRECs) . . . . . . . 1

1.1.3 HISTORICAL RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (HRECs) . . . . . . . . 1

1.1.4 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS (OECs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

1.1.5 De MINIMIS CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

1.1.6 DATA GAPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

1.2 RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

2.1.1 CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

2.1.2 UTILITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

4.1 TOPOGRAPHY AND REGIONAL SURFACE WATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

4.2 GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

4.3 OIL & GAS EXPLORATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

5.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

5.1 HISTORICAL RECORDS SOURCES & AVAILABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

5.2 HISTORICAL RECORDS FINDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

5.2.1 PAST USES OF SUBJECT PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

5.2.2 PAST USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

5.2.3 PAST USES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

5.3 OTHER HISTORICAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

5.4 Building Permits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

6.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

6.1 METHODOLOGY & LIMITATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
Page ii
838

6.2 INTERVIEWS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

6.3 OBSERVATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

6.3.1 PCB CONTAINING EQUIPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

6.3.2 CATCH BASINS OR DRY WELLS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

6.4 VAPOR ENCROACHMENT CONDITION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

6.5 NON-ASTM STANDARD OBSERVATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

6.5.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL (ACM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

6.5.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

6.5.3 RADON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

6.5.4 LEAD IN DRINKING WATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

7.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

7.1 FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORY REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

7.1.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY REGULATORY REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

7.1.2 ADJACENT AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES REGULATORY REVIEW . . . . . . 49

7.1.3 NON-GEOCODED SITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

7.2 LOCAL REGULATORY REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59

8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS . . . . . . . 61

9.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

9.1 PURPOSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

9.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

9.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

9.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS OF ASSESSMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

9.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

9.6 USER RELIANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

10.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS . . . 66

10.1 Definition of an Environmental Professional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

10.2 Relevant Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

11.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
Page iii
839

TABLE OF APPENDICES
Appendix A - Photographs
Appendix B - Maps & Figures
Appendix C - Aerial Photographs
Appendix D - Topographic Maps
Appendix E - Fire Insurance Maps
Appendix F - City Directory
Appendix G - Regulatory Database Report
Appendix H - Supporting Documents
Appendix I - Personnel Profile
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
Page iv
840

1.0 INTRODUCTION
EDI Consultants, Inc. (“EDI”) conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the Vacant Commercial Retail Building, located at 2375 North Tustin Street, Orange, California, on January 5, 2024 utilizing currently accepted ESA industry standards in accordance with ASTM E 1527-21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Process and Sunwest Bank's (Sunwest) Environmental Due Diligence requirements. ASTM Standard E-1527-21 constitutes “all appropriate inquiry” into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B). Exceptions to or deletions from the scope of work are described in Section 9.4.

1.1 OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

1.1.1 RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (RECs)
The assessment has revealed no evidence of known Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) in connection with the Subject Property.

1.1.2 CONTROLLED RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (CRECs) The assessment has revealed no evidence of known Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) in connection with the Subject Property.

1.1.3 HISTORICAL RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS (HRECs) The assessment has revealed the following evidence of known Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) in connection with the Subject Property:
• Former LUST Incident - Case Closed
Based on our review, the Subject Property, identified as Beacon Bay Auto Wash #01, was formerly situated in the southwestern corner of the property. This site was listed in the LUST database (Global ID: T0605902085), among others. A LUST case, initiated in 1997 for the former Beacon Bay Auto Wash, involved the removal of nine 12,000-gallon single-walled underground storage tanks (USTs) containing gasoline. Upon their removal, elevated concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE were detected in several soil confirmation samples within the tank excavations and near the dispenser islands, though groundwater was not encountered. The tanks were replaced in 1997 with two new double-walled 12,000-gallon fiberglass USTs containing gasoline, and the excavations were backfilled with reported clean imported fill. Several soil sampling investigations were conducted, specifically in 1999, 2000, 2002, and 2004. The newer USTs were subsequently removed in 2007 when the car wash was demolished; confirmation soil 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
1 841
samples indicated no hydrocarbon impacts to the soil. In 2009, a fixed soil vapor extraction (SVE) system and thermal oxidizer were implemented at the site to remediate the previously documented LUST impacts. This system operated until 2012, removing an estimated total of 32,387 pounds of hydrocarbons. Post-SVE shutdown in 2013, confirmation borings were advanced, with samples collected every five feet to a depth of 100 to 105 ft below ground surface (bgs) and analyzed for TPHg and VOCs, including oxygenates. TPHg was detected in only one boring location, at a maximum concentration of 43 mg/kg. The case was recommended for closure based on the removal of the USTs, the depth to groundwater, and the minimal concentrations and extents of TPHg detections.

Closure was granted on February 11, 2014, by the OCHCA, the local regulatory oversight agency. The cleanup area was repaved and has served as a parking lot since the car wash demolition in 2007. Given its regulatory closure, the former LUST incident is considered an HREC in connection with the Subject Property.

1.1.4 OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS (OECs)
No known Other Environmental Considerations (OECs) were identified during the course of this assessment.

1.1.5 De MINIMIS CONDITIONS
No known De Minimis Conditions were identified during the course of this assessment.

1.1.6 DATA GAPS
No significant data gaps were identified during the course of this assessment that would affect EDI's ability to identify RECs.

1.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
No Further Action
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
2 842

2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION OVERVIEW
A description of the key characteristics of the Subject Property is provided below. This description is derived from information provided by the User and information gathered during the site reconnaissance unless otherwise noted. Photographs of the Subject Property and adjacent properties are included in Appendix A. A Site Location Map is included in Appendix B.

2.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY

PROPERTY INFORMATION
Property Name Vacant Commercial Retail Building
Address 2375 North Tustin Street, Orange, Orange County, California Subject Property Acreage ±4.671 acres
Current Owner BTPROP3 LLC and BTPROP4 LLC
Current Occupant(s) Currently unoccupied
Number of Parcels Two (2)
Tax ID / Parcel #(s) 372-642-31 and 372-642-32
Legal Description P BK 39 PG 38 PAR 3 PM 39-38 PAR 3 POR OF PAR AND POR OF PAR 2 P BK 39 PG 38 PAR 2 PM 39-38 PAR 2 POR OF PAR
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
3 843
844

2.1.1 CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY
A description of the Subject Property and any building on it and a current tenant list with a short description of their operations is provided below:

PROPERTY FEATURES AND IMPROVEMENTS
Shape of Parcel(s) Irregular
Usage Commercial retail
Number of Buildings One (1)
Stories One (1)
Construction Date 2008
Square Footage 45,675 SF
Basement/Slab-on-Grade Slab-on-Grade
Number of Units One (1)
Elevators N/A
Transformers One (1) utility-owned, pad-mounted electrical transformer Emergency Generators N/A
Other Improvements N/A
Property Coverage Asphalt-paved parking areas and travel lanes; concrete-paved pedestrian walkways and minimal landscaping
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
5 845
West elevation North elevation
East elevation South elevation
The Subject Property is currently a vacant commercial retail/warehouse building. As such, hazardous wastes are not generated on-site. On-site observations did not indicate any past activities suspected to have degraded the environmental quality of the Subject Property.

2.1.2 UTILITIES

SUBJECT PROPERTY UTILITIES
Electricity Southern California Edison
Water City of Orange
Sanitary Sewer City of Orange
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
6 846
North adjacent property -Park 72
Condominiums
North adjacent property - Multi-tenant
commercial office/retail building

SUBJECT PROPERTY UTILITIES
Natural Gas Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas)
Solid Waste CR&R Incorporated

2.2 SITE AND VICINITY GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS
The following is a tabulation of surrounding property usage:

Direction Adjoining Properties
Listed in Regulatory
Database
North Multi-tenant commercial office/retail building (2393 North Tustin Street) and Park 72 Condominiums
(1800 East Heim Avenue)

South Multi-tenant commercial retail buildings (2341 - 2347 North Tustin Street), Coco Palms (2295 North Tustin
Street), and Orange Mobile Home Park (1931 East
Meats Avenue)

East Undeveloped land followed by Costa Mesa Freeway 
West Walmart (2300 North Tustin Street) 
No adverse surficial environmental conditions were observed on the adjoining properties.

Adjacent properties listed in the regulatory database(s), if any, are discussed in Section 7.1.2. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
7 847
South adjacent property - Orange Mobile
Home Park
South adjacent property - Multi-tenant
commercial office/retail building
South adjacent property - Multi-tenant
commercial office/retail building
East adjacent properties - Vacant land
followed by Costa Mesa Freeway
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
8 848
West adjacent property - Walmart
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
9 849

3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION
Pursuant to ASTM E 1527-21, EDI requested the following site information from Sunwest Bank (User of this report).

Type of Information
User
Provided
Issue
Identified Comments
Title Records No
Environmental Liens or
Activity and Use
Limitations
No
Specialized Knowledge No
Commonly Known or
Reasonably
Ascertainable
Information
No
Valuation Reduction for
Environmental Issues
No
Previous Reports Yes No Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of Amazon Site Code - Retail 2375 North
Tustin Street Orange, California dated May 12,
2021, prepared by Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.
(see Section 5.3)
• This assessment has revealed no
evidence of RECs in connection with
the Site. However, an HREC and de
minimis condition have been identified.

Owner, Property
Manager, Occupant
Information
Yes No BTPROP3 LLC and BTPROP4
LLC reportedly owns and manages the Subject
Property. It is currently unoccupied commercial
retail/warehouse building as described in Section

2.0. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
10 850
Type of Information
User
Provided
Issue
Identified Comments
Reason for Performing
the Phase I
Yes No This ESA was performed to permit the User to
satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the
innocent landowner, contiguous property owner,
or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on
scope of Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) liability
(hereinafter, the "landowner liability protections,"
or "LLPs").

ASTM User
Questionnaire
No
Other No
EDI considers the lack of title records, environmental liens, AULs and ASTM user questionnaires for this resource to be a data gap; however, based on other available resources for the property, the absence of these user-provided items does not represent a significant data gap for the Subject Property.
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
11 851

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Information regarding hydrological conditions in the region was obtained from review of the following:
• United States Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5 Minute Topographic Map, • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation reports, • Physical Settings Report (ERIS)
• Ground water contour maps, and
• Local regulatory sources.

4.1 TOPOGRAPHY AND REGIONAL SURFACE WATER

TOPOGRAPHY AND REGIONAL SURFACE WATER
Elevation (feet above mean
sea level)
265.28 feet above mean sea level
Inferred Groundwater /
Surface Water Gradient
West
Nearest Water Body Unnamed pond, approximately 0.52 mi NNW Fletcher Basin, approximately 0.57 mi NW
Olive Hills Reservoir, approximately 0.69 mi NE
Source (USGS Topographic
Quadrangle)
Orange, California

4.2 GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY

GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY
Geologic Formation / Province Geologic Unit Q
Geologic Description Quaternary alluvium and marine deposits Soil Type Sorrento clay loam, 2 to 9 percent slopes, warm MAAT, MLRA 19 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
12 852

GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY
Soil Description The Sorrento component makes up 75 percent of the map unit. Slopes are 2 to 9 percent. This component is on alluvial fans, alluvial plains. The parent material consists of alluvium derived from sedimentary rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is moderately high.

Available water to a depth of 60 inches (or restricted depth) is high.

Shrink-swell potential is moderate. This soil is not flooded. It is not ponded.

There is no zone of water saturation within a depth of 72 inches. Organic matter content in the surface horizon is about 3 percent. This component is in the R019XD001CA Clayey (1975) ecological site. Nonirrigated land capability classification is 3e. This soil does not meet hydric criteria. The calcium carbonate equivalent within 40 inches, typically, does not exceed 3 percent.

There are no saline horizons within 30 inches of the soil surface.

Groundwater Flow Direction West
Approximate Depth to
Groundwater
The depth to groundwater beneath the Subject Property is not specifically known; however, according to groundwater data in the vicinity of the Subject Property obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker website, a former Leaking Underground Storage Tank site, THRIFTY OIL #366 (Case # T0605900877) is located at 2493 North Tustin Street, to the northwest of the Subject Property. The shallow groundwater beneath the site was recorded over 86 feet below ground surface (bgs).

4.3 OIL & GAS EXPLORATION
The on-site reconnaissance addressed oil and gas exploration at the Subject Property. No evidence of oil or gas wells or the drilling of oil and gas wells was observed on site. In addition, EDI’s review of the Physical Setting Report data provided by ERIS did not depict any oil or gas wells on or in the immediate vicinity of the Subject Property. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
13 853

5.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW
EDI attempted to determine the history of the Subject Property and surrounding area to help identify past uses that may have resulted in one or more RECs at the Subject Property. Efforts were made to identify the uses of the Subject Property dating back to 1940 or first developed use.

5.1 HISTORICAL RECORDS SOURCES & AVAILABILITY
The table below summarizes the historical resources that were available for review:

Aerial
Photographs
Fire Insurance
Maps
Local Street
Directories Topographic Maps
No coverage
available    
Prior to 1940    
1940 - 1945    
1946 - 1950    
1951 - 1955    
1956 - 1960    
1961 - 1965    
1966 - 1970    
1971 - 1975    
1976 - 1980    
1981 - 1985    
1986 - 1990    
1991 - 1995    
1996 - 2000    
2001 - 2005    
2006 - 2010    
2011 - 2015    
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
14 854
Aerial
Photographs
Fire Insurance
Maps
Local Street
Directories Topographic Maps
2016 - 2020    
Current    

5.2 HISTORICAL RECORDS FINDINGS
Aerial Photograph Summary Table
Year
Subject
Property North South East West
REC
Identified
1928 Agricultural
land
Agricultural
land
Agricultural
land
Agricultural
land
Agricultural
land 
1938 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
1946 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
1953 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
1963 NSC Vacant land
and under
development
of the
existing
multi-family
residential
buildings
Vacant land
and existing
mobile home
park
Agricultural
land and
existing
freeway
NSC

1972 Existing
commercial
retail/
warehouse
building and
former car
wash
building
Vacant land
and existing
multi-family
residential
buildings
Vacant land,
existing
multi-family
residential
building and
existing
mobile home
park
Vacant land
and existing
freeway
Former
commercial
retail/
warehouse
buildings 
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
15 855
Aerial Photograph Summary Table
Year
Subject
Property North South East West
REC
Identified
1980 NSC Existing
multi-tenant
commercial
office/retail
building and
existing
multi-family
residential
buildings
Existing
multi-tenant
commercial
retail
buildings,
existing
multi-family
residential
building and
existing
mobile home
park

NSC NSC

1988 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
1995 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
2002 Existing
commercial
retail/
warehouse
building and
former car
wash
building has
been
demolished
NSC NSC NSC Existing
commercial
retail/
warehouse
building 
2009 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
2010 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
2012 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
2014 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
2016 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
2018 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
2020 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
2022 NSC NSC NSC NSC NSC 
NSC - No Significant Change
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
16 856
Topographic Maps Summary Table
Year
Subject
Property North South East West
REC
Identified
1981 Existing
commercial
retail/
warehouse
building and
former car
wash
building
Existing
multi-tenant
commercial
office/retail
building and
existing
multi-family
residential
buildings
Existing
multi-tenant
commercial
retail
buildings,
existing
multi-family
residential
building and
existing
mobile home
park
Vacant land
and existing
freeway
Former
commercial
retail/
warehouse
building

Historical City Directories - Subject Property Listings Year Subject Property REC Identified
1926 - 1945 STREET NOT LISTED 
1951 - 1955 RANGE NOT LISTED 
1958 - 1970 ADDRESS NOT LISTED 
1975 2375 North Tustin Street -
• BRUNSWICK ORANGE
BOWL
2355 North Tustin Street -
• ORANGE CAR WASH

1981 2375 North Tustin Street -
• BRUNSWICK ORG
BOWL
• ORANGE BOWL
2355 North Tustin Street -
• ORANGE CAR WASH

2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
17 857
Historical City Directories - Subject Property Listings Year Subject Property REC Identified
1986 2375 North Tustin Street -
• BRUNSWICK ORG
BOWL
• ORANGE BOWL
2355 North Tustin Street -
• BEACON BAY AUTO
WSH

1991 2375 North Tustin Street -
• BRUNSWICK ORANG
BWL
• ORANGE BOWL
2355 North Tustin Street -
• BEACON BAY AUTO
WSH
• SHOE SHINE MASTER

1996 2375 North Tustin Street -
• BRUNSWICK ORANG
BWL
• ORANGE BOWL
2355 North Tustin Street -
• BEACON BAY AUTO
WSH

2001 2375 North Tustin Street -
• BRUNSWICK ORANG
BWL
• ORANGE BOWL
• IN THE ZONE PRO
SHOP
2355 North Tustin Street -
• BEACON BAY AUTO
WSH

2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
18 858
Historical City Directories - Subject Property Listings Year Subject Property REC Identified
2003 2375 North Tustin Street -
• IN THE ZONE PRO
SHOP...HUNTING

EQUIPMENT AND

SUPPLIES
• ORANGE BOWL
2355 North Tustin Street -
• BEACON BAY AUTO
WASHES

2008 2375 North Tustin Street -
• BRUNSWICK
CORP...BOW LING

CENTERS
• IN THE ZONE PRO
SHOP...WHOL

SPORTING/

RECREATIONAL
GOODS
• ITZ
SPORTS...SPG,RECRE

ATIONAL GD

2012 2375 North Tustin Street -
• BESTBUY...ELECTRONI

C EQUIPMENT &

SUPPLIES-RETAIL
• ITZ SPORTS...BOW

LING LANE

EQUIPMENT & SUPLS
(WHLS)

2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
19 859
Historical City Directories - Subject Property Listings Year Subject Property REC Identified
2016 - 2022 2375 North Tustin Street -
• ADT-CUSTOMER
SVC...SECURITY

SYSTEMS
• BESTBUY...ELECTRONI

C EQUIPMENT &

SUPPLIES-RETAIL
2355 North Tustin Street -
• BEACON BAY AUTO
WASHES...AUTOMOBIL

E DETAIL & CLEAN-UP

SERVICE

Historical City Directories - Notable Adjacent and Surrounding Property Listings Year Adjacent/Surrounding Property REC Identified
1970 2301 North Tustin Street -
• SAFEWAY TIRE CO
2495 North Tustin Street -
• PHIL'S GULF SERVICE
2490 North Tustin Street -
• AL WOOD'S SHELL

SERVICE

1975 2301 North Tustin Street -
• HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF
ORANGE
2490 North Tustin Street -
• AL WOOD'S SHELL

SERVICE

2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
20 860
Historical City Directories - Notable Adjacent and Surrounding Property Listings Year Adjacent/Surrounding Property REC Identified
1981 2301 North Tustin Street -
• HOLLYWOOD TIRE
2490 North Tustin Street -
• ORANGE MALL SHELL

1986 - 1996 2301 North Tustin Street -
• HOLLYWOOD TIRE
• GOODYEAR TIRE DLRS
2285 North Tustin Street -
• DRY CLEAN EXPRESS
2490 North Tustin Street -
• ORANGE MALL SHLL
SV

2001 2301 North Tustin Street -
• HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF

ORANGE CO
• GOODYEAR TIRE DLRS
2285 North Tustin Street -
• DRY CLEAN EXPRESS
2490 North Tustin Street -
• ORANGE MALL SHELL
• BRADS ORANGE
EXXON

2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
21 861
Historical City Directories - Notable Adjacent and Surrounding Property Listings Year Adjacent/Surrounding Property REC Identified
2003 2301 North Tustin Street -
• HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF

ORANGE CNTY
2285 North Tustin Street -
• DRY CLEAN
EXPRESS...LAUNDRY

AND DRYCLEANER
AGENTS
2493 North Tustin Street -
• ARCO
2490 North Tustin Street -
• BRAD'S ORANGE
EXXON

2008 2301 North Tustin Street -
• HOLLYWOOD
TIRE...AUTOMOTIVE
TIRES
2285 North Tustin Street -
• DRY CLEAN
EXPRESS...GMT

PRESSG,CLRS AGT
2493 North Tustin Street -
• ARCO...SERVICE

STATIONS-GASOLINE &
OIL
2490 North Tustin Street -
• BRADS ORANGE
EXXON...SERVICE

STATIONS-GASOLINE &
OIL

2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
22 862
Historical City Directories - Notable Adjacent and Surrounding Property Listings Year Adjacent/Surrounding Property REC Identified
2012 2301 North Tustin Street -
• DANIELS TIRE
SVC...TIRE-DEALERS-R
ETAIL
• HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF
ORANGE
CO...AUTOMOBILE

REPAIRING & SERVICE
2285 North Tustin Street -
• DRY CLEAN
EXPRESS...CLEANERS
2493 North Tustin Street -
• ARCO MART...SERVICE

STATIONS-GASOLINE &
OIL
2490 North Tustin Street -
• BRAD'S
VALERO...SERVICE

STATIONS-GASOLINE &
OIL

2016 2301 North Tustin Street -
• DANIELS TIRE
SVC...GENERAL

AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR
2285 North Tustin Street -
• DRY CLEAN
EXPRESS...CLEANERS
2490 North Tustin Street -
• BRAD'S
VALERO...SERVICE

STATIONS-GASOLINE &
OIL

2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
23 863
Historical City Directories - Notable Adjacent and Surrounding Property Listings Year Adjacent/Surrounding Property REC Identified
2020 - 2022 2301 North Tustin Street -
• DANIELS TIRE
SVC...AUTOMOBILE

REPAIRING & SERVICE
2285 North Tustin Street -
• DRY CLEAN
EXPRESS...CLEANERS
2493 North Tustin Street -
• R M PACIFIC RIM
INC...SERVICE

STATIONS-GASOLINE &
OIL
2490 North Tustin Street -
• BRAD'S
VALERO...SERVICE

STATIONS-GASOLINE &
OIL


5.2.1 PAST USES OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
Before construction of the existing improvements in 2008, the Subject Property was undeveloped/ agricultural land from as far back as 1928 to 1963, followed by two former commercial buildings from as far back as 1972 to 1995, which were razed by 2002. From 2008 to the present, the development and commercial use of the Subject Property has remained essentially unchanged.

Based on our review of historical sources, the Subject Property, identified as Beacon Bay Auto Wash #01, was formerly situated in the southwestern corner of the property. This site was listed in the LUST database (Global ID: T0605902085), among others. Please refer to Section 7.1.1 for further discussion regarding the same.

With regard to the Subject Property being utilized for agricultural purposes from as far back as 1928, there is a potential that agricultural related chemicals such as pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, may have been used and stored onsite. It should be noted that the Subject Property is either paved over or covered by building structures that minimize direct contact to any potential remaining concentrations in the soil. Additionally, during previous site development activities, near surface soils (where residual agricultural chemical concentrations would have most likely 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
24 864
been present, if at all) were generally mixed with fill material or disturbed during grading. Also, it is common that engineered fill material is placed over underlying soils as part of the development activities. Furthermore, it is likely that residual agricultural chemicals (if any) would have likely degraded since the site was last utilized for agricultural purposes. These additional variables serve to further reduce the potential for exposure to residual agricultural chemicals (if any). Based on these reasons, EDI concludes that the possible former use of agricultural chemicals is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time.

5.2.2 PAST USES OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES
EDI's historical review of the adjoining properties indicates past tenants and uses which are consistent with primarily agricultural land, vacant land, residential, office, retail or warehouse establishments. Of importance, no indications of historical dry cleaning, auto repair or service station establishments were noted immediately adjoining the Subject property.

5.2.3 PAST USES OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES
Based on our review of historical sources, the south surrounding property, known as Hollywood Tire Of O.C. and addressed at 2301 North Tustin Street, has been tenanted by an auto repair facility from at least 1970 to the present. The site was identified in various regulatory databases, including LUST, among others. Please refer to Section 7.1.2 for further discussions regarding the same.

Based on our review of historical sources, the site located at 2285 North Tustin Street towards the south of the Subject Property has been tenanted by dry cleaners (DRY CLEAN EXPRESS) from 1986 to the present. Please refer to Section 7.1.2 for further discussions regarding the same.

Based on our review of historical sources, the site located at 2493 - 2495 North Tustin Street towards the north of the Subject Property has been developed with a gas service station from at least 1970 to the present. This site was listed in several databases including LUST. Please refer to Section 7.1.2 for further discussions regarding the same.

Based on our review of historical sources, the site located at 2490 North Tustin Street towards the north-northwest of the Subject Property has been developed with a gas service station from at least 1970 to the present. This site was listed in several databases including LUST. Please refer to Section 7.1.2 for further discussions regarding the same.

5.3 OTHER HISTORICAL INFORMATION
EDI reviewed an environmental assessment on the subject site titled Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of Amazon Site Code - Retail 2375 North Tustin Street Orange, California dated May 12, 2021, prepared by Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Amazon Retail LLC. The purpose of this review was to obtain information to supplement this report. The 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
25 865
information obtained was not verified for accuracy by EDI and a critique of the report was beyond the scope of this assessment. The Phase I ESA report identified the following environmental conditions in connection with the Subject Property:
• The Site is an approximately 5-acre property that currently consists of a 45,750-square-foot building and associated parking that is owned by Continental Bb Orange LLC (Continental Development), as well as a portion of parking lot owned by Beacon. The current building was constructed in 2008 and has been occupied by a Best Buy since its construction. Prior to this construction, the Site was occupied by an approximately 28,924-square-foot building in the northeastern corner of the Site that was used as a bowling alley and constructed in 1972, and an approximately 7,000-square-foot car wash and fueling center in the southwestern corner of the Site.

The Site vicinity is primarily residential, as well as commercial properties adjoining the Site to the west. California State Highway 55 adjoins the Site to the east. The Site and vicinity were used for agricultural (orchard) purposes until the 1960s. • The building was constructed in 2008, and as such, Geosyntec presumes that asbestos-containing material (ACM) and lead-based paint (LBP) are not likely to be present in building materials at the Site. Mr. Stephen Thorp of Burnham-Ward Properties LLC was not aware of ACM or LBP being present in building materials at the Site and was not aware of past ACM/LBP surveys or abatement activities. In addition, no water damage or mold issues were identified during preparation of this Phase I ESA. • Findings and Opinions
◦ The Phase I ESA performed by Geosyntec has revealed the following conditions as defined by ASTM:
▪ No Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) were identified during the course of this assessment.
▪ No Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions (CRECs) were identified during the course of this assessment.
▪ The following Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions (HRECs) was identified by Geosyntec:
▪ Closed On-Site Leaking Underground Storage Tanks: A release due to leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) in the southwestern portion of the Site was remediated and closed under regulatory oversight. A LUST case was opened in 1997 for the former Beacon Bay Auto Wash. Nine 12,000-gallon single-walled USTs containing gasoline were removed in 1997 upon which elevated concentrations of gasoline-range total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHg), benzene, toluene, ethyl
benzene, and xylenes (collectively BTEX), and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) were detected in several soil confirmation samples within the tank excavations and near the dispenser islands. Groundwater was not encountered. The tanks were replaced in 1997 by two new double-walled 12,000-gallon 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
26 866
fiberglass USTs containing gasoline, and the excavations backfilled with reported clean imported fill. Several soil sampling investigations were performed, including events in 1999, 2000, 2002, and 2004. The newer USTs were subsequently removed in 2007 when the car wash was demolished; confirmation soil samples indicated no hydrocarbon impacts to soil. In 2009, a fixed soil vapor extraction (SVE) system and thermal oxidizer were implemented at the Site to remediate the previously documented LUST impacts. This system operated until 2012 and removed an estimated total of 32,387 pounds of
hydrocarbons. Confirmation borings were advanced in 2013 after SVE shutdown, where samples were collected every five feet to a depth of 100 to 105 feet below ground surface (ft bgs) and analyzed for TPHg and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including oxygenates. TPHg was only detected in one boring location at a maximum concentration of 43 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). The case was recommended for closure based on the removal of the USTs, depth to groundwater, and minimal concentrations and extents of TPHg detections.

Closure was granted on 11 February 2014 by the Orange
County Health Care Agency (OCHCA), the local regulatory oversight agency. The cleanup area was repaved and has been used for parking since the car wash demolition in 2007. Based on the confirmation soil samples collected in 2013 indicating hydrocarbon impacts had largely been remediated via SVE, and regulatory closure approval, this finding is considered an HREC. ▪ De Minimis Conditions
▪ Historical Agricultural Land Use: Historical Site documents and aerial photographs indicated that portions of the Site were cleared from 1928 until around the early 1970s for what appeared to be orchard use. Based on the timeframe of the observed clearings, it is possible that hazardous pesticides or herbicides were used on Site; however, no evidence of
excessive pesticide/herbicide usage was found as part of this Phase I ESA. Therefore, this finding is not a REC but rather a de minimis condition.
▪ Data Gaps
▪ Following investigation, it appears that a “data gap” as defined by ASTM exist for the Site. Due to time and scope limitations in preparing the Phase I ESA, no in-person file review was conducted with local, state, or federal agencies. However, in 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
27 867
Geosyntec’s opinion, this data gap is not considered to be significant with respect to identification of additional RECs for the Site.
• Conclusions
◦ Geosyntec has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527 of 2375 North Tustin Street, Orange, California 92865 the property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in this report. ◦ This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the Site.

However, an HREC and de minimis condition have been identified, as described above.

EDI generally concurs with the findings and recommendations of the aforementioned report.

5.4 Building Permits
EDI obtained a Permit Timeline Report provided by BuildFax. BuildFax searched its national database of building permits, and identified the following permit-issuing authority for the Subject Property:

City of Orange, Community Development
300 East Chapman Avenue
Orange, CA 92866
(714) 744-7200
No other permit records were found between Dec 01, 1988 and Dec 28, 2023. The Permit Timeline report is included in Appendix H.

Documentation reviewed did not reveal information on the Subject Property which is suspected to represent an impact to the environmental integrity of the Subject Property. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
28 868

6.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE
As part of the site reconnaissance, EDI looked for evidence of the presence of hazardous substances used, stored, or discarded at and near the Subject Property. A summary of the site reconnaissance is provided below. Locations of pertinent observations are depicted on the figures provided in the appendices of this report. Photographs of pertinent findings and features observed during the site reconnaissance are provided in Appendix A of this report.

6.1 METHODOLOGY & LIMITATIONS
The Subject Property site reconnaissance was conducted in a systematic manner focusing initially on the exterior, which was surveyed in a grid pattern. A representative portion of the Subject Property’s interior spaces were also surveyed in a systematic manner. Where access to portions of the Subject Property or to structures on the Subject Property was unavailable or limited (i.e. due to weather conditions), EDI renders no opinion as to the presence of petroleum products or hazardous substances in that portion of the Subject Property or structure. In addition, EDI renders no opinion as to the presence of, or indirect evidence relating to, petroleum products or hazardous substances where direct observation of the interior walls, floor, or ceiling of a structure was obstructed by objects or coverings on or over these surfaces.

The following spaces were visually and physically observed and when reasonably accessible:
• Subject Property interiors
• exteriors
• mechanical
• electrical rooms
• adjoining and surrounding properties
There were no notable portions of the Subject Property excluded from this survey.

Site Reconnaissance Date January 5, 2024
Assessor Jeric Santos
Weather 65°F; Partly Cloudy
Limiting Conditions None
Key Site Contact(s); Title Sally Fowler; Subject Property Contact A Pre-Survey Questionnaire (PSQ) to be filled out and returned to EDI by someone knowledgeable about the Subject Property was provided to Ms. Fowler; however, it has not been returned as of the writing of this report. A copy of the blank PSQ is provided in Appendix H. EDI 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
29 869
considers the lack of the completed PSQ for this resource to be a data gap; however, based on other available resources for the property, the absence of the PSQ does not represent a significant data gap for the Subject Property.

6.2 INTERVIEWS
The following information was provided by individuals contacted by EDI in connection with the Subject Property. Findings from these interviews are discussed in the appropriate sections in this report.

INTERVIEW COMMENTS
Contact Relation to Subject Property Details of Conversations Sally Fowler Subject Property Contact Ms. Fowler escorted EDI during site reconnaissance. She indicated that no
deficiencies, or other environmentally
related problems are known to exist at
the Subject Property.

6.3 OBSERVATIONS
The following tables summarize items on which the survey of interior and exterior areas of the Subject Property focused. If noted, the item is discussed in detail in Sections below:

Item Noted- Interior Noted - Exterior REC Identified
Processes that generate petroleum
products or hazardous substances   
Unusual odors   
Pools of liquid   
Drums, Containers ≥5 gallons   
Corrosion or Pitting   
Sumps or Trench drains   
PCB containing equipment   
Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)   
Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs)   
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
30 870
Item Noted- Interior Noted - Exterior REC Identified
Areas of asphalt patch or surface
depressions   
Stained soil or pavement   
Stressed vegetation   
Fill material of questionable origin/ Piles   
Clarifier/Wastewater   
Monitoring Wells   
Catch basins or dry wells   
Septic systems   
Wetlands   
On-site Water Well   
Other   

6.3.1 PCB CONTAINING EQUIPMENT
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) are known hazardous materials that are found in coolants or lubricating oils used in some electrical transformers, light ballasts, electrical panels or other similar equipment. PCB content in electrical transformers has been grouped into three (3) regulatory categories by the federal government. Parts per million is signified by ppm. • 0 - 50 ppm non-PCB unit
• 50 - 500 ppm PCB contaminated unit
• >500 ppm PCB unit
Utility companies often own transformer equipment and typically assume the responsibility for repair or replacement of damaged or leaking units and for required cleanup or remediation activities. Indications of damage or leakage should be immediately reported to the responsible utility company.

EDI observed one (1) utility-owned, pad-mounted electrical transformer on site. The transformer as viewed from street level appeared in good condition and leaks or stains were not observed. Prior to 1976, PCBs were commonly used in di-electric fluids in transformers, capacitors, and light ballasts. In any event, in accordance with Title 40—Protection of Environment, Chapter 1—Environmental Protection Agency, Subchapter R—Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA), Part 761—Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs), Manufacturing, Processing, 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
31 871
One (1) utility-owned, pad-mounted
transformer
Catch basin Catch basin
Distribution in Commerce, and Use Prohibitions, the owner of the transformer, Southern California Edison, is responsible for its maintenance and remediation in the event of a leak. As such, no action is warranted at this time with respect to same.

6.3.2 CATCH BASINS OR DRY WELLS
Stormwater runoff collected by catch basins is discharged into the municipal stormwater management system. The catch basins observed did not exhibit staining or odors indicative of the introduction of hazardous materials and/or petroleum products. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
32 872

6.4 VAPOR ENCROACHMENT CONDITION
EDI has conducted a Vapor Encroachment Screen (VES) by evaluating historic and regulatory record sources along with soil, topographic, and groundwater data in the vicinity of the Property.

The purpose of the VES is to determine the likelihood that Vapor Encroachment Conditions (VECs) exist at the Property. It should be noted that this VES was not conducted in full compliance with ASTM E2600-15; rather, this VES is the equivalent of a Tier 1 screening.

Consideration of vapor encroachment consists of reviewing available information and use of professional judgment in determining 1) whether contamination is suspected in the soil and/or groundwater at, or near, the Property, and 2) whether identified contamination is suspected to exist within a 'Critical Distance’ from the Property.
“Critical Distances”, as defined in ASTM E2600-15 Standard Guide for Vapor Encroachment Screening on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions, refer to the maximum distances at which vapor encroachment may occur. These distances vary depending on topographic and hydrologic gradient, width of the contaminant plume, and type of contaminant known, or suspected, to exist. Generally, Critical Distances are 100 feet for non-petroleum contaminants of concern (COCs) and 30 feet for dissolved petroleum COCs. If a facility is beyond the critical distance, it is highly unlikely that a VEC exists. Consideration of topographic gradient is key to defining the Areas of Concern (AOCs) within which Critical Distances are applied. When plume data is not available, AOCs are used in lieu of Critical Distance to determine whether a VEC exists or not. According to ASTM E2600, the AOCs for these critical distances are as follows:
• 1,760 feet (1/3 mile) for contamination located up-gradient of the Property, except for dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons, which have a distance of 528 feet (1/10 mile), • 365 feet for contamination located cross-gradient of the Property, • 100 feet for contamination located down-gradient of the Property, with the exception of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons, which have a distance of 30 feet. If non-aqueous phase petroleum hydrocarbons (LNAPL) are present, the 100-foot distance is utilized.

In defining a standard of good commercial and customary practice for determining a VEC on a parcel of property, the goal of the process established by this practice is to identify whether or not a VEC exists or is likely to exist on the property. The term VEC means the presence or likely presence of any COC in the indoor air environment of existing or planned structures on a property caused by the release of vapor from contaminated soil or groundwater either on the property or within close proximity to the property, at a concentration that presents or may present an unacceptable health risk to occupants. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that do not normally represent an unacceptable health risk to occupants and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. A condition determined to be de minimis does not represent a VEC.
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
33 873
In EDI’s professional opinion, none of the adjacent sites listed in the databases reviewed pose a significant threat to the Subject Property based on one or more of the following rationale: 1) there is no indication of a release at the respective sites, 2) a release has occurred but the medium affected was the soil only and the site is beyond the Critical Distance, and 3) the site location and/or plume of contamination is downgradient and in excess of the Critical Distance from the Subject Property. Thus, a VEC can be ruled out because a VEC is not suspected to exist at the Subject Property. In addition, potential exposure to a VEC, should it exist, is further reduced by the presence of structures and pavement at the site. Based on the foregoing, no further action is warranted at this time with respect to a potential VEC from an adjacent property.

6.5 NON-ASTM STANDARD OBSERVATIONS

6.5.1 ASBESTOS CONTAINING MATERIAL (ACM)
The use of asbestos in many building products was banned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the late 1970s. In 1989, EPA issued a ruling prohibiting the manufacturing, importation, processing, and distribution of most asbestos containing products. This rule, known as the Ban & Phase-Out Rule, would have effectively banned the use of nearly 95% of all asbestos products used in the United States. However, the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded most of the Ban and Phase Out Rule in October 1991. Due to this court decision, many asbestos containing product categories not previously banned (prior to 1989) may still be in use today. Among these common material types found in buildings are floor tile and roofing materials.

Asbestos-containing material (ACM) represents a concern when it is subject to damage that results in the release of fibers. Friable ACM, which can be crumbled by hand pressure and is therefore susceptible to damage, is of particular concern. Non-friable ACM is a potential concern if it is damaged by maintenance work, demolition or other activities.

No friable ACMs were identified. However, due to the continued distribution of a wide variety of asbestos-containing building materials, asbestos may be present in some of the roofing, flooring, caulking/putties, adhesives, spackling compounds, and/or non-accessible insulation materials at the Subject Property. Sampling of these types of materials require techniques that may be destructive to subject facilities and in the case of roofing material may void warranties. It is recommended that all such possible asbestos-containing materials be tested prior to renovation or demolition activities that could disturb the materials. Any testing, removal, or disturbance of ACM should be handled in compliance with federal, state, and local regulations. Licensed, qualified asbestos abatement personnel should be retained prior to demolition or renovation of Subject Property's facilities.
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
34 874

6.5.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT (LBP)
LBP is paint with a lead concentration greater than 5,000 parts per million (ppm) as defined by the EPA. LBP may be an environmental concern in residential properties based on the condition and maintenance of the paint and the presence or absence of LBP hazards. A LBP hazard is defined as damaged paint or paint covering a deteriorated subsurface that may create dust or chips that could potentially be ingested or inhaled.

Screening for LBP is outside of the scope of an ASTM Phase I investigation. In addition, the scope of this assignment did not include a LBP screening because the Subject Property use is commercial and LBP is therefore not an area of concern. Of importance, painted surfaces observed were in good condition and void of significant peeling and flaking.

6.5.3 RADON
Radon gas is a gas created from the radioactive decay of uranium. It exists in soil with a high concentration of uranium rocks or industrial waste. Radon gas may seep into and accumulate in dwellings through cracks in the foundation or walls or any other opening such as a floor drain.

The EPA has categorized radon levels into three (3) regulatory zones measured in pico-Curies per liter (pCi/L). The EPA action level for radon is 4.0 pico-Curies per liter. • Level 1: Greater than 4 pCi/L
• Level 2: Between 2 and 4 pCi/L
• Level 3: Less than 2 pCi/L
Analysis for radon is not within the scope of an ASTM Phase I investigation. Sunwest did not request a radon gas screening, therefore EDI did not conduct a screening as part of this Phase I investigation.

The EPA Map of Radon Zones indicates Orange County is in a Zone 3 radon area. Zone 3 is defined as areas that have a low potential for radon gas with levels <2.0 pCi/L. The EPA guideline for radon is 4.0 pCi/L. Due to the non-residential use of the Subject Property, and in accordance with the scope of work, radon testing was not performed. Notwithstanding, long term sampling and testing are the only definitive means of radon detection.

6.5.4 LEAD IN DRINKING WATER
Lead has historically been used in pipes, solder, and brass fixtures used in water distribution systems and plumbing material. In 1986, EPA banned the use of lead at concentrations exceeding 0.2% lead in solder and 8% lead in other plumbing material. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
35 875
The City of Orange provides domestic water to the vicinity. Analysis for lead in drinking water is not within the scope of a Phase I ESA investigation. The Client did not request a lead in drinking water screening; therefore, EDI did not conduct a screening. According to City of Orange's 2022 Consumer Confidence Report, the City of Orange is in compliance with all federal and local regulations concerning water quality. Based upon the foregoing information, EDI’s opinion is that lead in drinking water is not a concern at the Subject Property. Notwithstanding, lead in drinking water sampling and testing are the only definitive means of lead detection. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
36 876

7.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW
In accordance with ASTM Practice E1527-21, EDI reviewed applicable and reasonably accessible federal, state, and local records as part of this Phase I ESA. The environmental records review was performed in the form of an environmental database search conducted by Environmental Risk Information Services, in an attempt to ascertain whether the Subject Property or neighboring properties were suspected of having environmental conditions with the potential to impact (or that have impacted) the soil, soil gas, and/or groundwater at the Subject Property. The database search included regulatory agency lists of known or potential hazardous waste facilities, landfills, hazardous waste generators, and disposal facilities in addition to properties under investigation under investigation due to identified or potential contamination. The information provided in this section was obtained from publicly available sources. The locations of the properties listed in this report are plotted with a geographic information system (GIS) utilizing geocoding of property addresses. Specific records and search distances for these environmental databases were reported by ERIS to be consistent with ASTM Practice E1527-21 and are discussed in the ERIS report (dated January 26, 2024).

7.1 FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORY REVIEW
A copy of the regulatory database report provided by Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) appears in Appendix G. EDI reviewed each database report to determine if certain sites identified therein are suspected to represent a material negative environmental impact to the Subject Property. The following table summarizes the number of sites by database within the prescribed search radius appearing in the database report:

Regulatory Report Summary
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
SSTS 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

SUPERFU
ND ROD

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SWAT 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
SWF/LF 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
SWRCB
SWF

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

TANK OIL
GAS

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
37 877
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
TOXIC
PITS

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRIS 0.02 0 - - - - 0
TSCA 0.125 0 0 - - - 0
UST 0.25 0 2 0 - - 2
UST

ANAHEIM

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
UST

CLOSURE

0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1

UST CLP

ANAHEIM

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
UST
ORANGE

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
UST
SWEEPS

0.25 1 3 0 - - 4
VCP 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
WASTE
DISCHG

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
WASTE
TIRE

0.02 0 - - - - 0
WMUD 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1

PIPELINE

INCIDENT

0.02 0 - - - - 0

PROCESS
ORS

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

PROPOSE
D NPL

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PRP 0.02 0 - - - - 0
RCRA

CONTROL
S

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
38 878
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
RCRA

CORRACT
S

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RCRA
LQG

0.25 0 0 3 - - 3
RCRA

NON GEN

0.25 1 18 27 - - 46
RCRA
SQG

0.25 0 2 3 - - 5
RCRA
TSD

0.5 0 1 0 3 - 4
RCRA
VSQG

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

RECYCLIN
G

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
REFN 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

RESPONS
E

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SCH 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SCRD

DRYCLEA
NER

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
SEMS 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
SEMS

ARCHIVE

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
SEMS
LIEN

0.02 0 - - - - 0
SMCRA 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AFS 0.02 0 - - - - 0
ALT
FUELS

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
39 879
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
AST 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
AST

ANAHEIM

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
AST
ORANGE

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
AST
SWRCB

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
BULK

TERMINAL

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
C&D
DEBRIS
RECY

0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1
CALSITES 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
CDL 0.125 0 0 - - - 0
CDO/CAO 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
CERCLIS 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

CERCLIS
LIENS

0.02 0 - - - - 0

CERCLIS
NFRAP

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
CERS HAZ 0.125 1 10 - - - 11
CERS
TANK

0.25 0 2 0 - - 2
CHMIRS 0.02 0 - - - - 0

CLEANUP
SITES

0.5 0 0 0 3 - 3

CONSENT

DECREES

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

CONTAIN

ER RECY

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
40 880
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
DEED 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

DELETED
NPL

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

DELISTED

CLEANUP

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

DELISTED
COUNTY

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

DELISTED
CTNK

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

DELISTED

DRYCLEA
NERS

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

DELISTED
ENVS

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DELISTED

FED DRY

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

DELISTED
FRP

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

DELISTED
HAZ

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

DELISTED
INDIAN
LST

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

DELISTED
INDIAN
UST

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

DELISTED
LST

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

DELISTED
TNK

0.25 1 0 0 - - 1
DOE
FUSRAP

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
41 881
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
DRYC
GRANT

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

DRYCLEA
NERS

0.25 0 1 0 - - 1
DTSC
HWF

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

EMISSION
S

0.25 0 5 5 - - 10

ENVIROS
TOR

1.0 0 0 0 1 3 4
ERNS 0.02 0 - - - - 0
ERNS
1982 TO
1986

0.02 0 - - - - 0
ERNS
1987 TO
1989

0.02 0 - - - - 0
ERNS
PFAS

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
FED

BROWNFI
ELDS

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
FED

DRYCLEA
NERS

0.25 0 1 0 - - 1
FED ENG 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
FED INST 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
FEMA UST 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
FINDS/
FRS

0.02 2 2 - - - 4
FORMER
NIKE

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
42 882
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
FRP 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
FTTS
ADMIN

0.02 0 - - - - 0
FTTS
INSP

0.02 0 - - - - 0
FUDS 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FUDS
MRS

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0

GEOTRAC
KER

0.125 0 0 - - - 0
HAZ GEN 0.02 5 1 - - - 6
HAZ TSD 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
HAZNET 0.02 1 2 - - - 3
HHSS 0.25 1 3 1 - - 5
HIST
CHMIRS

0.02 0 - - - - 0
HIST

CORTESE

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

HIST GAS

STATIONS

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
HIST

MANIFEST

0.02 0 - - - - 0
HIST
MLTS

0.02 0 - - - - 0
HIST
TANK

0.25 1 3 1 - - 5
HIST
TSCA

0.125 0 0 - - - 0
HLUR 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
HMIRS 0.125 0 0 - - - 0
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
43 883
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
HW
ORANGE

0.125 1 6 - - - 7
HW

TRANSPO
RT

0.125 0 0 - - - 0
HWP 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HWSS

CLEANUP

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
ICIS 0.02 0 1 - - - 1
ICP
ORANGE

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
INDIAN
LUST

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
INDIAN
UST

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
INSP
COMP
ENF

1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IODI 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
LDS 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
LIEN 0.02 0 - - - - 0
LM SITES 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LOP
ORANGE

0.5 0 2 0 3 - 5
LUCIS 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
LUR 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
LUST 0.5 1 3 0 6 - 10

MEDICAL
WASTE

0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
MINE 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
44 884
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
MINES 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0
MLTS 0.02 0 - - - - 0
MRDS 1.0 0 0 0 0 1 1
NCDL 0.125 0 0 - - - 0
NPL 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NPL IC 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
NPUT
ORANGE

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
ODI 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PCB 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PCBT 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS

E-MANIFE
ST

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

PFAS FED
SITES

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS
GHG

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

PFAS GT

CLEANUP
S

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS GW 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS IND 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS
INVEST

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS
NPDES

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS NPL 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
45 885
Database
Search
Radius
Target
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.12mi to

0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi Total
PFAS

SAMPLIN
G

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS
SSEHRI

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS TRI 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS
TSCA

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0
PFAS
WATER

0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

7.1.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY REGULATORY REVIEW
The Subject Property was identified in the DELISTED TNK, LUST, HHSS, HAZNET, FINDS/ FRS, HIST TANK, UST SWEEPS, five times in HAZ GEN, CERS HAZ, RCRA NON GEN, and HW ORANGE databases. Details of the databases the Subject Property were identified in are discussed below:

Subject Property Summary
Database Site Name Address Dist. (mi) / Dir. Elev. diff. (ft) Comments

DELISTED TNK BAY AUTO
WASH
2355 N TUSTIN
AVE, Orange,
CA, 92865

0.00/WSW -6.0 Refer to the
LUST listing
below

LUST BEACON BAY

AUTO WASH
#01
2355 NORTH

TUSTIN,

ORANGE, CA,
92867

0.00/WSW -6.0 Case Closed on
February 11,
2014; See
below for further
discussion

HHSS ORANGE

AUTO WASH
2355 NORTH
TUSTIN

STREET,

ORANGE, CA,
92667

0.00/WSW -6.0 Refer to the
LUST listing
above
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
46 886
Database Site Name Address Dist. (mi) / Dir. Elev. diff. (ft) Comments HAZNET 96BEACON
BAY

ENTERPRISES
INC
2355 NO

TUSTIN,

ORANGE, CA,
926670000

0.00/WSW -6.0 Refer to the
LUST listing
above

FINDS/FRS BEACON BAY

AUTO WASH
#01
2355 NORTH

TUSTIN,

ORANGE, CA,
92867

0.00/WSW -6.0 Refer to the
LUST listing
above

HIST TANK ORANGE

AUTO WASH
2355 NORTH
TUSTIN

STREET,

ORANGE, CA,

0.00/WSW -6.0 Refer to the
LUST listing
above

UST SWEEPS ORANGE

AUTO WASH
2355 N

TUSTIN,

ORANGE, CA,

0.00/WSW -6.0 Refer to the
LUST listing
above

HAZ GEN BEACON BAY

ENTERPRISES
INC
2355 NO

TUSTIN,

ORANGE, CA,
926670000

0.00/WSW -6.0 Refer to the
LUST listing
above
CERS HAZ Best Buy #1198 2375 N TUSTIN

ST, ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.00/W -7.0 Refer to the

RCRA NON
GEN listing
below

RCRA NON
GEN

BEST BUY
STORE #1198
2375 N TUSTIN

ST, ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.00/W -7.0 No violations

FINDS/FRS BEST BUY
STORE #1198
2375 N TUSTIN

ST, ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.00/W -7.0 Refer to the

RCRA NON
GEN listing
above
HW ORANGE Best Buy #1198 2375 N Tustin
St Orange, Ca
92865-3705,
Orange, CA,
92865-3705

0.00/W -7.0 Refer to the

RCRA NON
GEN listing
above

HAZ GEN BEST BUY
STORE #1198
2375 N TUSTIN

ST, ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.00/W -7.0 Refer to the

RCRA NON
GEN listing
above
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
47 887
Database Site Name Address Dist. (mi) / Dir. Elev. diff. (ft) Comments

HAZ GEN BEST BUY
STORE #1198
2375 N TUSTIN

ST, ORANGE,
CA, 928653705

0.00/W -7.0 Refer to the

RCRA NON
GEN listing
above

HAZ GEN BEST BUY CO
STORE 1198
2375 N TUSTIN

ST, ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.00/W -7.0 Refer to the

RCRA NON
GEN listing
above

HAZ GEN BEST BUY
STORE 1198
2375 N TUSTIN

ST, ORANGE,
CA, 928653705

0.00/W -7.0 Refer to the

RCRA NON
GEN listing
above
Based on our review, the Subject Property, identified as Beacon Bay Auto Wash #01, was formerly situated in the southwestern corner of the property. This site was listed in the LUST database (Global ID: T0605902085), among others. A LUST case, initiated in 1997 for the former Beacon Bay Auto Wash, involved the removal of nine 12,000-gallon single-walled underground storage tanks (USTs) containing gasoline. Upon their removal, elevated concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE were detected in several soil confirmation samples within the tank excavations and near the dispenser islands, though groundwater was not encountered. The tanks were replaced in 1997 with two new double-walled 12,000-gallon fiberglass USTs containing gasoline, and the excavations were backfilled with reported clean imported fill. Several soil sampling investigations were conducted, specifically in 1999, 2000, 2002, and 2004. The newer USTs were subsequently removed in 2007 when the car wash was demolished; confirmation soil samples indicated no hydrocarbon impacts to the soil. In 2009, a fixed soil vapor extraction (SVE) system and thermal oxidizer were implemented at the site to remediate the previously documented LUST impacts. This system operated until 2012, removing an estimated total of 32,387 pounds of hydrocarbons. Post-SVE shutdown in 2013, confirmation borings were advanced, with samples collected every five feet to a depth of 100 to 105 ft below ground surface (bgs) and analyzed for TPHg and VOCs, including oxygenates. TPHg was detected in only one boring location, at a maximum concentration of 43 mg/kg. The case was recommended for closure based on the removal of the USTs, the depth to groundwater, and the minimal concentrations and extents of TPHg detections. Closure was granted on February 11, 2014, by the OCHCA, the local regulatory oversight agency. The cleanup area was repaved and has served as a parking lot since the car wash demolition in 2007. Given its regulatory closure, the former LUST incident is considered an HREC in connection with the Subject Property.

It should be noted that the former on-site tenant, Best Buy, was listed in several regulatory databases such as RCRA NON GEN, FINDS/FRS, HW ORANGE and HAZ GEN. Based on our review, Best Buy generated small quantities of retail store hazardous wastes. During a routine evaluation by the Orange County Environmental Health on January 24, 2023, hazardous waste 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
48 888
containers were observed to be properly labeled and stored closed. Inasmuch as no violations or compliance infractions was identified with respect to the former Best Buy tenant, it is not suspected that it has had a negative environmental impact on the Subject Property.

7.1.2 ADJACENT AND SURROUNDING PROPERTIES REGULATORY REVIEW The properties listed on the database were evaluated utilizing their downgradient to upgradient hydrologic locations in relation to the Subject Property in addition to other factors (see Section

4.1).

In October 1995, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory presented “Recommendation to Improve the Cleanup Process for California’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tanks.” Data compiled by Lawrence Livermore indicated that fuel groundwater contamination plumes seldom extended greater than 400 feet (0.075 mile) from the source in the worst cases. Therefore, EDI uses this data to further evaluate concern presented by off-site properties identified in the database. It should be noted that this data is specific to fuel releases. It should also be noted that the data was in some cases for very permeable soil types.

A summary of the adjacent and surrounding properties within 1/8 mile (0.12 miles) is listed in the table below:

Surrounding Properties Summary
Database Site Name Address
Dist. (mi) /
Dir.

Elev. diff.
(ft) Comments

HAZNET ORANGE

VILLAGE

DENTISTRY
DENTAL
GROUP
2393 N

TUSTIN ST
STE A,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.01/WNW -6.0 Refer to the RCRA NON
GEN listing below

RCRA NON
GEN
ORANGE

VILLAGE

DENTISTRY
DENTAL
GROUP
2393 N

TUSTIN ST
STE A,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.01/WNW -6.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Downgradient

FINDS/FRS ORANGE

VILLAGE

DENTISTRY
DENTAL
GROUP
2393 N

TUSTIN ST
STE A,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.01/WNW -6.0 Refer to the RCRA NON
GEN listing above
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
49 889
Database Site Name Address
Dist. (mi) /
Dir.

Elev. diff.
(ft) Comments

HAZNET AMC

THEATRE
2320 N

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA,
928650000

0.01/W -6.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Downgradient

FINDS/FRS VISTA PAINT

CORPORATI
ON #4
2341 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.02/SW -7.0 Refer to the HHSS listing
below

HHSS VISTA PAINT

CORPORATI
ON
2341 N.

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA, 92665

0.02/SW -7.0 Listed for one (1)
5,000-gallon UST installed
in 1978; No reported leaks,
spills or open violations;
Downgradient

ICIS VISTA PAINT

CORPORATI
ON #4
2341 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.02/SW -7.0 Refer to the HHSS listing
above
HW ORANGE Vista Paint #4 2341 N Tustin
St Orange, Ca
92865-3705,
Orange, CA,
92865-3705

0.02/SW -7.0 Refer to the HHSS listing
above
CERS HAZ Vista Paint #4 2341 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.02/SW -7.0 Refer to the HHSS listing
above

HIST TANK VISTA PAINT

CORPORATI
ON
2341 N.

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA,

0.02/SW -7.0 Refer to the HHSS listing
above

RCRA NON
GEN

VISTA PAINT

CORPORATI
ON #4
2341 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA,
92865-3705

0.02/SW -7.0 Refer to the HHSS listing
above
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
50 890
Database Site Name Address
Dist. (mi) /
Dir.

Elev. diff.
(ft) Comments

HAZ GEN VISTA PAINT

CORPORATI
ON #4
2341 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA,
928653705

0.02/SW -7.0 Refer to the HHSS listing
above

LUST HOLLYWOO

D TIRE OF
O.C.
2301 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92667

0.05/SW -10.0 Case Closed on December
7, 1994; See below for
further discussion
HW ORANGE Daniels Tire
Service
2301 N Tustin
St Orange, Ca
92865-3705,
Orange, CA,
92865-3705

0.05/SW -10.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

CERS HAZ DANIELS
TIRE

SERVICE
2301 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.05/SW -10.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

RCRA NON
GEN

DANIEL'S
TIRE

SERVICE
2301 N

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA,
92865-0000

0.05/SW -10.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
UST
SWEEPS

HOLLYWOO

D TIRE OF
O.C. INC.
2301 N

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA,

0.05/SW -10.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

RCRA NON
GEN
JANET

SPRINGSTE
AD
2422

ROBINHOOD

PL, ORANGE,
CA, 92867

0.05/ENE 13.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Downgradient
CERS HAZ Panda
Express
#2142
2318 N

TUSTIN ST
STE C,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.06/WNW -5.0 No reported leaks, spills or
open violations;
Downgradient
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
51 891
Database Site Name Address
Dist. (mi) /
Dir.

Elev. diff.
(ft) Comments
CERS HAZ Rubio's
Restaurants
Inc. Store 48
2318 NORTH
TUSTIN

STREET,

SUITE A,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.06/WNW -5.0 No reported leaks, spills or
open violations;
Downgradient
CERS HAZ McDonald's 2401 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.06/WNW -4.0 No reported leaks, spills or
open violations;
Downgradient
CERS HAZ Olive Garden
#1389
2330 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.07/NW -4.0 No reported leaks, spills or
open violations;
Downgradient
CERS HAZ BIG 5

SPORTING
GOODS #038
2445 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.07/NW -3.0 Refer to the RCRA NON
GEN listing below

RCRA NON
GEN
BIG 5

SPORTING
GOODS #038
2445 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA,
92865-3707

0.07/NW -3.0 No reported leaks, spills or
open violations;
Downgradient
HW ORANGE Big 5 Sporting
Goods #038
2445 N Tustin
St Orange, Ca
92865-3707,
Orange, CA,
92865-3707

0.07/NW -3.0 Refer to the RCRA NON
GEN listing above
EMISSIONS VILLA FORD 2250 N

TUSTIN AV,

ORANGE,
CA, 92667

0.07/SW -11.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Downgradient
CERS HAZ Noodles &
Company
#581
2214 N

TUSTIN ST
STE B,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.08/SW -9.0 No reported leaks, spills or
open violations;
Downgradient; Sufficient
distance
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
52 892
Database Site Name Address
Dist. (mi) /
Dir.

Elev. diff.
(ft) Comments
CERS HAZ KFC K312066 2469 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.08/NW 0.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Sufficient
distance

RCRA NON
GEN
SPT

SERVICES
INC., DBA

SERVPRO

OF TUSTIN/

ORANGE &

VILLA PARK
2295 N.

TUSTIN
AVE., UNIT
26, ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.09/S -8.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Downgradient;
Sufficient distance

RCRA NON
GEN

JENNIFER
TURNER
2295 N

TUSTIN ST
UNIT 34 `,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.09/S -8.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Downgradient;
Sufficient distance

RCRA NON
GEN

EMANUEL
CHAVEZ
2295 N

TUSTIN ST,
UNIT 26,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.09/S -8.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Downgradient;
Sufficient distance

RCRA SQG DRY CLEAN

EXPRESS
2285 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92867

0.09/SSW -10.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Downgradient;
Sufficient distance; See
below for further discussion

DRYCLEANE
RS

DRYCLEAN

EXPRESS
2285 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA,

0.09/SSW -10.0 Refer to the RCRA SQG
above
HW ORANGE Dry Clean
Express
2285 N Tustin
St Orange, Ca
92865-3703,
Orange, CA,
92865-3703

0.09/SSW -10.0 Refer to the RCRA SQG
above

CERS HAZ DRY CLEAN

EXPRESS
2285 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.09/SSW -10.0 Refer to the RCRA SQG
above
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
53 893
Database Site Name Address
Dist. (mi) /
Dir.

Elev. diff.
(ft) Comments

RCRA NON
GEN

DRYCLEAN

EXPRESS
2285 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA,
92865-3703

0.09/SSW -10.0 Refer to the RCRA SQG
above
FED

DRYCLEANE
RS

DRYCLEAN

EXPRESS
2285 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.09/SSW -10.0 Refer to the RCRA SQG
above

RCRA NON
GEN
ADRIAN

HAYMOND
2462 N

ROBINHOOD
PLACE,

ORANGE,
CA, 92867

0.10/NE 21.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Sufficient
distance

EMISSIONS DRYCLEAN

EXPRESS,
RAJENDA J.

S
2285 N

TUSTIN AV,

ORANGE,
CA, 92660

0.10/SSW -9.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Downgradient;
Sufficient distance

RCRA TSD GENEVIEVE

KOERNER
2295 N

ROBINHOOD

PL, ORANGE,
CA, 92867

0.11/ENE 19.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Sufficient
distance

RCRA NON
GEN

GENEVIEVE

KOERNER
2295 N

ROBINHOOD

PL, ORANGE,
CA, 92867

0.11/ENE 19.0 Refer to the RCRA TSD
listing above

RCRA NON
GEN

LEONARDO

PALAFOX
AND

BRENDA M

PALAFOX
1800 E HEIM
AVE #57,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.11/N 12.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Sufficient
distance

RCRA NON
GEN
MATT

DIETRICH
1800 E HEIM
AVE #45,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.11/N 12.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Sufficient
distance

RCRA NON
GEN

CHRISTINE
RIVERS
1800 E HEIM
AVE,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.11/N 12.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Sufficient
distance
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
54 894
Database Site Name Address
Dist. (mi) /
Dir.

Elev. diff.
(ft) Comments

RCRA NON
GEN
SUSANA 1800 HEIM
AVE UNIT 65,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.11/N 12.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Sufficient
distance

LUST THRIFTY OIL
#366
2493 N.

TUSTIN

STREET,

ORANGE,
CA, 92867

0.12/NW 3.0 Case Closed on March 21,
2013; See below for further
discussion

HHSS THRIFTY OIL
STN 366
2493 N.

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA, 92667

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
HW ORANGE Speedway No
4678 Arco
2493 N Tustin
St Orange, Ca
92865-3707,
Orange, CA,
92865-3707

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

UST SPEEDWAY
No. 4678
2493 N Tustin
St, Orange,
CA, 92865

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
EMISSIONS TES30O
(USA) 63366
2493 N

TUSTIN,
30ANGE, CA,
92865

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
LOP
ORANGE
Thrifty Oil
#366
2493 N Tustin
St Orange Ca
92865-3707, ,
CA,

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

CERS TANK SPEEDWAY
No. 4678
2493 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

HIST TANK THRIFTY OIL
STN. #366
2493 N.

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA,

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
55 895
Database Site Name Address
Dist. (mi) /
Dir.

Elev. diff.
(ft) Comments

EMISSIONS TESORO
(USA) 63366
2493 N

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

RCRA NON
GEN
TESORO

REFINING &

MARKETING

COMPANY
LLC #63366
2493 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA,
92865-3707

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
UST
SWEEPS

THRIFTY OIL

STATION
#366
2493 N

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA,

0.12/NW 3.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

RCRA SQG ORANGE

MALL SHELL
2490 TUSTIN
ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
below

LUST SHELL

SERVICE

STATION
2490 TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA, 92867

0.12/NW 2.0 Case Closed on May 28,
1999; See below for further
discussion

HHSS RAY A
PERRY
2490 N

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA, 92667

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
HW ORANGE Brads Valero 2490 N Tustin
St Orange, Ca
92865-3708,
Orange, CA,
92865-3708

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

UST BRADS
VALERO
2490 N Tustin
St, Orange,
CA, 92865

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
LOP
ORANGE
Shell Service
Station
2490 N Tustin
St Orange Ca
92865-3708, ,
CA,

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
56 896
Database Site Name Address
Dist. (mi) /
Dir.

Elev. diff.
(ft) Comments

CERS TANK BRADS
VALERO
2490 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

HIST TANK RAY A
PERRY
2490 N.

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA,

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

RCRA NON
GEN
SPARKY

STATION

CORP DBA
BRAD'S
VALERO
2490 N

TUSTIN ST,

ORANGE,
CA,
92865-3708

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

EMISSIONS BRADS
VALERO
2490 N

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA, 92865

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above
UST
SWEEPS
SHELL

SERVICE

STATION
2490 N

TUSTIN,

ORANGE,
CA,

0.12/NW 2.0 Refer to the LUST listing
above

RCRA NON
GEN

VIVIAN P
MURRAY
2271 N

ROBINHOOD

PL, ORANGE,
CA,
92867-1849

0.12/ENE 22.0 No reported leaks, spills or
violations; Sufficient
distance
No adjacent properties were listed in the regulatory database report indicating a potential contamination condition suspected of having impacted the Subject Property.

Based on our review of historical sources, the south surrounding property, known as Hollywood Tire Of O.C. and addressed at 2301 North Tustin Street, has been tenanted by an auto repair facility from at least 1970 to the present. The site was identified in various regulatory databases, including LUST, among others. According to the LUST case listing, a release of waste oil was discovered in June 1994 during the closure of a tank. The affected medium was listed solely as soil. Reportedly, the contaminated soil was excavated and disposed of offsite. The case was closed on December 7, 1994, following a 'No Further Action' (NFA) determination by the City of Orange Fire Department (LOP). Given its reported regulatory closure, this LUST incident is not believed to have had a negative environmental impact on the Subject Property. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
57 897
Based on our review of historical sources, the site located at 2285 North Tustin Street towards the south of the Subject Property has been tenanted by dry cleaners (DRY CLEAN EXPRESS) from 1986 to the present. Of importance, the dry cleaner site listed in the historical street directories does not pose a significant threat to the Subject Property based on one or more of the following rationale: 1) there is no indication of a release at the respective sites and 2) the site location is downgradient (away from Subject Property) and in excess of the critical distance of 100-feet from the Subject Property. Thus, a VEC can be ruled out because a VEC is not suspected to exist at the Subject Property. In addition, potential exposure to a VEC, should it exist, is further reduced by the presence of structures and pavement at the site. Moreover, the estimated depth to groundwater is over 200 feet below ground surface (bgs) in the vicinity. Based on the foregoing, no further action is warranted at this time with respect to a potential on-site or adjacent VEC.

Based on our review of historical sources, the site located at 2493 - 2495 North Tustin Street towards the north of the Subject Property has been developed with a gas service station from at least 1970 to the present. This site was listed in several databases including LUST which was awarded a “Cased Closed” status on March 21, 2013 by the Santa Ana RWQCB (Region 8), the lead regulatory agency. This classification is granted to those sites that have been remediated to the satisfaction of the lead agency or are not suspected to pose a significant threat to human health or the environment. Given its reported regulatory status, this LUST incident is not suspected to have had an adverse environmental impact on the Subject Property.

Based on our review of historical sources, the site located at 2490 North Tustin Street towards the north-northwest of the Subject Property has been developed with a gas service station from at least 1970 to the present. This site was listed in several databases including LUST which was awarded a “Cased Closed” status on May 28, 1999 by the Santa Ana RWQCB (Region 8), the lead regulatory agency. This classification is granted to those sites that have been remediated to the satisfaction of the lead agency or are not suspected to pose a significant threat to human health or the environment. Given its reported regulatory status, this LUST incident is not suspected to have had an adverse environmental impact on the Subject Property.

Other off-site properties were identified during the review of the regulatory database report.

These properties are not suspected of adversely impacting the Subject Property based on one or more of the following rationale:
• the sufficient distance from the Subject Property;
• their assumed topographic position relative to the Subject Property (i.e. downgradient); • inferred groundwater flow direction away from the Subject Property; • the nature of their release (i.e., soil only);
• the absence of reported leaks, spills or violations; and • their reported regulatory status (i.e. no further action, case closed, no further remediation). 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
58 898

7.1.3 NON-GEOCODED SITES
The regulatory database report identified three (3) “Non-Geocoded” (orphan) sites.

Non-Geocoded Sites are those sites which could not be mapped due to inadequate address information. Refer to the database report contained in Appendix G for a list of these Non-Geocoded Sites. EDI attempted to locate these sites via vehicular reconnaissance and interviews with personnel familiar with the area. Based on this research, EDI did not identify any Non-Geocoded Sites within the specified radii.

7.2 LOCAL REGULATORY REVIEW
Information obtained from local agencies was requested via one of the following methods • written correspondence,
• review of published data,
• telephone conversations, or
• in person.

Local offices consulted during the preparation of this Report included the following:

Source
Date
Contacted
Information
Reviewed/
Received Comments
Orange County
Environmental
Health Department
02/02/24

EDI submitted a FOIA request to the Orange County
Environmental Health Department for information
regarding storage tanks, chemical spills, and other
potential environmental concerns in connection with the Subject Property, but has received no response from this department at the issuance of this report.

Building
Department
02/02/24

Please refer to Section 5.4 for readily available permits provided by BuildFax.

South Coast Air
Quality
Management
District
02/02/24

EDI reviewed South Coast Air Quality Management
District (FIND) records online. No records for the Subject Property are on file with the South Coast Air Quality
Management District.

CA State Water
resources Control
Board
02/02/24

EDI reviewed Regional Water Quality Control Board
(GeoTracker) records online. 2355 N Tustin Street is on file with the Regional Water Quality Control Board for
former Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Case
T0605902085
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
59 899
Source
Date
Contacted
Information
Reviewed/
Received Comments
CA Department of
Toxic Substances
Control
02/02/24

EDI reviewed reviewed California Department of Toxic
Substances Control (Envirostor and HWTS) records
online. No
records for the Property are on file with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control.

CA Division of Oil
and Gas Resources
02/02/24

EDI reviewed the State of California Geologic Energy
Management Division (CalGEMS) online database
(https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/). No wells were located on or within 1/4 mile of the Subject Property.

Bureau of Mines 02/02/24

EDI reviewed the California Department of Conservation, Division of Mine Reclamation records online at
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/mol/index.html. No
mines were identified on the Subject Property.

Documentation applicable to the Subject Property in those departments noted above was requested and reviewed when and where reasonably ascertainable, as detailed in ASTM E-1527-21. No documented adverse environmental conditions or complaints were reported at the Subject Property and/or readily on file at these offices. The local offices did not contain records of spills or releases having occurred at the Subject Property.

For those agencies whereby EDI has not yet received a response, upon receipt of same, if the provided information has a material affect on the findings of this Report, EDI will forward the new information, together with revised findings, as an addendum to this Report. If no response is received or no material violations are noted, our Report will not be modified. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
60 900

8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL

PROFESSIONALS
EDI declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312” and We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.

Luke Deal
Author/Project Manager
Brian Tang
Environmental Professional/Reviewer
Darrin Domingo, REPA, CHMM
Registered Environmental Property Assessor –
No. 642775
Certified Hazardous Materials Manager – No. 11546
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
61 901

9.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK
EDI was retained by Sunwest Bank (“Sunwest”) to prepare a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, in compliance with ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21 on the Subject in accordance with our agreement dated January 23, 2024.

9.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) and petroleum products. As such, this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”): that is, the practice that constitutes “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B).

EDI understands that the findings of this study will be used by Sunwest Bank to evaluate a pending financial transaction in connection with the Subject Property with respect to ASTM Standard E 1527-21.

ASTM Standard Practice E1527-21 defines a Recognized Environmental Condition (REC) as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. Conditions determined to be de minimis generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Conditions determined to be de minimis conditions are not Recognized Environmental Conditions or Controlled Recognized Environmental Conditions.

A Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC) is a Recognized Environmental Condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
62 902
A Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) is a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the Property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the Property to any required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls).

De minimis conditions are defined by ASTM as environmental conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies.

Other Environmental Considerations (OEC) warrant discussion, but do not qualify as RECs as defined by ASTM. These include, but are not limited to, de minimis conditions, environmental considerations, business environmental risks and/or Non-ASTM-Scope Issues such as the presence of ACMs, LPB, radon, mold, and lead in drinking water, which can affect the liabilities and financial obligations of the client, the health and safety of site occupants, and the value and marketability of the subject property.

9.2 DETAILED SCOPE OF SERVICES
The scope of work for this ESA is in general accordance with the requirements of ASTM Standard E 1527-21. EDI warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the methodologies set forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an Environmental Site Assessment of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. No other warranties are implied or expressed.

9.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS
There is a possibility that even with the proper application of these methodologies there may exist on the Subject Property conditions that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. EDI believes that the information obtained from the record review and the interviews concerning the site is reliable.

However, EDI cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. The methodologies of this assessment are not intended to produce all inclusive or comprehensive results, but rather to provide Sunwest Bank with information relating to the Property.

9.4 LIMITATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS OF ASSESSMENT
The purpose of this report is to assess the Subject Property with respect to the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in accordance with the provisions of ASTM Standard E 1527-21.
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
63 903
The conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions, based solely upon visual observations of the Subject Property and vicinity and our interpretation of the available historical information and documents reviewed as described in this report. They are intended exclusively for the purpose outlined herein and for the Subject Property location and project indicated. EDI is a technical not legal firm, as such we offer no opinion as to the legal aspects of environmental compliance (permitting, remediation, etc.) and anyone relying upon this report should have this ESA reviewed by counsel regarding any legal issues. This report is intended for the sole use of Sunwest Bank. The scope of services performed in execution of this investigation may not be appropriate to satisfy the needs of other users, and any use or reuse of this document or the findings, and conclusions, presented herein is at the sole risk of said user.

It should be recognized that this study was not intended to be a definitive investigation of contamination at the Subject Property. It is possible that currently unrecognized contamination may exist at the Subject Property. Opinions presented herein apply to Subject Property conditions existing at the time of our investigation and those reasonably foreseeable. They cannot necessarily apply to Subject Property changes of which EDI is unaware and has not had the opportunity to evaluate. Additional information that becomes available after our survey and draft submission concerning the Subject Property should be provided to EDI so that our conclusions may be revised and modified if necessary, at additional cost. This Report has been prepared in accordance with our Standard Conditions for Engagement, which is an integral part of this Report.

This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report was performed in accordance with applicable, generally accepted environmental consulting practices currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions, and utilizing methods and procedures consistent with established commercial practices and in conformance with industry standards. The findings and conclusions contain all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies that are referred to in ASTM 1527-21.

9.5 SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The conclusions and findings set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of agreed-upon services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the client. No subsurface exploratory drilling or sampling was done under the scope of this work. Unless specifically stated otherwise in the report, no chemical analyses have been performed during the course of this ESA.

Some of the information provided in this report is based upon personal interviews, and research of available documents, records, and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This is subject to the limitations of historical documentation, availability, and accuracy of pertinent records, and the personal recollections of those persons contacted. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
64 904

9.6 USER RELIANCE
All reports, both verbal and written, are for the benefit of Sunwest Bank, its successors and assigns. This report has no other purpose and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written consent of EDI.
2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
65 905

10.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF ENVIRONMENTAL

PROFESSIONALS

10.1 Definition of an Environmental Professional
An Environmental Professional means: (1) a person who possesses sufficient specific education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional judgment to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases (see §312.1(c)) on, at, in, or to a property, sufficient to meet the objectives and performance factors in §312.20(e) and (f). (2) Such a person must: (i) hold a current Professional Engineer’s or Professional Geologist’s license or registration from a state, tribe, or U.S. territory (or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico) and have the equivalent of three (3) years of full-time relevant experience; or (ii) be licensed or certified by the federal government, a state, tribe, or U.S. territory (or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico) to perform environmental inquiries as defined in §312.21 and have the equivalent of three (3) years of full-time relevant experience; or (iii) have a Baccalaureate or higher degree from an accredited institution of higher education in a discipline of engineering or science and the equivalent of five (5) years of full-time relevant experience; or (iv) have the equivalent of ten (10) years of full-time relevant experience. (3) An environmental professional should remain current in his or her field through participation in continuing education or other activities. (4) The definition of environmental professional provided above does not preempt state professional licensing or registration requirements such as those for a professional geologist, engineer, or site remediation professional. Before commencing work, a person should determine the applicability of state professional licensing or registration laws to the activities to be undertaken as part of the inquiry identified in §312.21(b). (5) A person who does not qualify as an environmental professional under the foregoing definition may assist in the conduct of all appropriate inquiries in accordance with this part if such person is under the supervision or responsible charge of a person meeting the definition of an environmental professional provided above when conducting such activities.

10.2 Relevant Experience
Relevant experience, as used in the definition of environmental professional in this section, means: participation in the performance of all appropriate inquiries investigations, environmental site assessments, or other site investigations that may include environmental analyses, investigations, and remediation which involve the understanding of surface and subsurface environmental conditions and the processes used to evaluate these conditions and for which professional judgment was used to develop opinions regarding conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases (see §312.1(c)) to the subject property.

Resumes for the Environmental Professionals involved in this project are included in Appendix I. 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
66 906

11.0 REFERENCES
Documents Reviewed, Agencies &
Individuals Contacted Source
USGS 7.5 Minute, Orange, California
Quadrangle Topographic Map, 1981
Environmental Risk Information Services
Regulatory Database Report Environmental Risk Information Services Fire Insurance Maps Search Environmental Risk Information Services City Directory Search Environmental Risk Information Services Aerial Photographs Environmental Risk Information Services Geologic Information Environmental Risk Information Services Well Information Environmental Risk Information Services Oil and Gas Well Information Environmental Risk Information Services Assessor's Parcel Map and Information Orange County Assessor Environmental Quality Data and Records Orange County Environmental Health Department Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB) GeoTracker Database Search
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Air Quality Records Search South Coast Air Quality Management District Department of Toxic Substance Control
(DTSC) Hazardous Waste Tracking System
(HWTS) Records
Department of Toxic Substance Controls
Building Records Search and Review City of Orange Building and Safety Services Division Fire history & code violations Orange Fire Department
Code compliance & violations, and
Certificates of Occupancy
City of Orange Community Development Department
Zoning Information City of Orange Planning Division
Subject Property Information Sally Fowler - Subject Property Contact 2375 North Tustin Street
Orange, California
EDI Project No. 224-0059
67 907
Appendix A - Photographs
908
1) Front view of Subject Property 2) North elevation
3) South elevation 4) East elevation
5) West elevation 6) Front exit
909
7) Main entrance 8) Building interior
9) Building interior 10) Building interior
11) Building interior 12) Building interior
910
13) Storage area 14) Storage room
15) Storage room 16) Building interior
17) Ceiling detail 18) Ceiling detail
911
19) Office sound room 20) Storage room
21) Main electrical panel and dry type transformer 22) Dock rollup doors 23) Roof access 24) Water heater
912
25) Mop sink 26) Trash compactor baler
27) Fire pump riser 28) Drain
29) Northeast building structure tower 30) Roof
913
31) HVAC at roof top 32) Loading docks
33) Rain gutter 34) Main electrical panel with meter
35) Gas utility 36) Fire riser access
914
37) One (1) utility-owned, pad-mounted transformer 38) Catch basin 39) Catch basin 40) Sewer
41) Catch basin 42) Water and fire hydrant
915
43) Parking lot at eastern portion 44) Western portion parking lot 45) North adjacent property - Multi-tenant commercial office/retail building
46) North adjacent property -Park 72 Condominiums
47) South adjacent property - Multi-tenant commercial office/ retail building
48) South adjacent property - Multi-tenant commercial office/ retail building
916
49) South adjacent property - Orange Mobile Home Park 50) East adjacent properties - Vacant land followed by Costa Mesa Freeway
51) West adjacent property - Walmart
917
Appendix B - Maps & Figures
918
919
Appendix C - Aerial
Photographs
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
Appendix D - Topographic Maps
939
940
Appendix E - Fire Insurance
Maps
941

Appendix F - City Directory
943
Project Property: 2375 N Tustin St
2375 N Tustin St
Orange,CA 92865
Project No: 224-0059
Requested By: EDI Consultants, Inc.

Order No: 24012400327
Date Completed: January 31, 2024
944
January 31, 2024
RE: CITY DIRECTORY RESEARCH
2375 N Tustin St
Orange,CA 92865
Thank you for contacting ERIS for an City Directory Search for the site described above. Our staff has conducted a reverse listing City Directory search to determine prior occupants of the subject site and adjacent properties. We have provided the nearest addresses(s) when adjacent addresses are not listed. If we have searched a range of addresses, all addresses in that range found in the Directory are included.

Note: Reverse Listing Directories generally are focused on more highly developed areas. Newly developed areas may be covered in the more recent years, but the older directories will tend to cover only the "central" parts of the city.To complete the search, we have either utilized the ACPL, Library of Congress, State Archives, and/or a regional library or history center as well as multiple digitized directories.These do not claim to be a complete collection of all reverse listing city directories produced.

ERIS has made every effort to provide accurate and complete information but shall not be held liable for missing, incomplete or inaccurate information.To complete this search we used the general range(s) below to search for relevant findings. If you believe there are additional addresses or streets that require searching please contact us at 866-517-5204.

Search Criteria:
1800-1815 of E Heim Ave
1930-1940 of E Meats Ave
2200-2500 of N Tustin St
Search Notes:
945
Search Results Summary
Date Source Comment
2022 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2020 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2016 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2012 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2008 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2003 DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2001 HAINES
1996 HAINES
1991 HAINES
1986 HAINES
1981 HAINES
1975 PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1970 PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1964 PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1958 PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1955 PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1951 LUSKEYS
1945 WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1940 WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1937 WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1934 WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1930 WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1926 FLAGGS
946
2022 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2022 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 3
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1800 ADELINA VAQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ALEJANDRO MONGE...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ANTHONY CASCIANO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 BRETTSTARNES...RESIDENTIAL
1800 C CADENA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 CARE FREE PLANTS...PLANTS-RETAIL
1800 CECIL NELUMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 COURTNEY KLEMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 DANIELLE FEWINGS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 DARRYL HARPER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 EXECUTIVE MBA COUNCIL...ASSOCIATIONS
1800 FELIPE LORENZANA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 FRANCINE LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 FRANK SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
1800 GABRIEL PEREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 GILBERTO RODRIGUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 HARVEY NELSON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 IGNACIO CUELLAR...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JAMES WILLIAMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JAVIER CERDA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JERI HOSKEY...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOHN BAUTISTA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOHN HUDOBA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOSE BASURTO SANTOS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOSE IRINEO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOSEPHINE JIMENEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JUDITH REEDER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 KAREN BEVER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 KAREN MC LINTOCK...RESIDENTIAL
1800 KIMBERLY GUTIERREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 LYLE TAKIMOTO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 MARINA FUENTES...RESIDENTIAL
1800 RALPH FENTON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 SANDRA BRAVO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 SARAH LOPEZ-BLANCO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 SARAH WARD...RESIDENTIAL
1800 SERVANDO URIOSTEGUI...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VASQUEZ LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VERALYNN ADAMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VICTORIA FLORES...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WENDY BALDRIDGE...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WILLIAM KELLY...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WORRY FREE SOLUTIONS...INSTRUCTIONAL CONSULTANTS
1801 BATES, DIANE G...MARRIAGE & FAMILY COUNSELORS
1801 BATES, DIANE G...COUNSELING SERVICES
1801 CORNERSTONE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH...HEALTH SERVICES
1801 LESTER, THOMAS C MD...MEDICAL & SURGICAL SVC ORGANIZATIONS 1801 LESTER, THOMAS C MD...PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS
1801 PEREIRA & MOFFATTLAW OFFICES...ATTORNEYS
1801 RE PRO REALTY...REAL ESTATE
1801 RE PRO REALTY...REAL ESTATE INSPECTION
1801 RICHARD MCGUCKIN MARRAGE...SOCIAL SERVICE & W ELFARE

ORGANIZATIONS
1801 US LAW CTR...LEGAL SERVICES
1815 24/7 COSMETIC & PARA MED TATTO...PERMANENT MAKE-UP 1815 ADTSECURITY SVC...SECURITY SYSTEMS
1815 CAMPBELL LODGING INC...CAMPGROUNDS
1815 CAMPBELL LODGING INC...HOTEL & MOTEL MANAGEMENT
1815 METRO ENGINEERING...ENGINEERS
1815 METRO ENGINEERING...ROAD BUILDING CONTRACTORS
1815 METRO ENGINEERING...ASPHALT & ASPHALT PRODUCTS
1815 OWNITGROUP...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
1815 RCP ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT...HEALTH SERVICES
1815 RCP ADVANCED LIFE SUPPORT...CLINICS
1815 RICHARDSON GROUP...BUSINESS SERVICES NEC
1815 WESTCAL CONSTRUCTION CO...COMMERCIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING

CONSTRUCTION
1815 WESTCAL CONSTRUCTION CO...BOILERSSUPPLIES & PARTS (W HLS) 1815 WESTCAL CONSTRUCTION CO...CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES
103 total records. Part 1 of 2
1931 ADALBERTO CORTEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ADELINA HERRERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 AFFIRMATIVE HANDYMAN SVC...HANDYMAN SERVICES
1931 ALEX AGUILAR...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ALFRED CAMPA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ALICIA VALLADOLID...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ALMA CORTEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 AMPARO MARCELO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANGELICA ZEPEDA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANTONIO ESPINOSA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANTONIO RAMIREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ARTURO PEREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 BRIAN SANDOVAL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CAL AM PROPERTIES...REAL ESTATE
1931 CARLOS VELASCO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CASEY GELLER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CELIA ALVARADO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CHAN YANG...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CHRISTINA JIMENEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DELMY AMAYA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DEMETRIO CHOPIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DIANE BALDWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 EDILBERTO MARTINEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ELIGIO MEJIA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ESTHER MACEDO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FABIOLA VARGAS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FERNANDO COYAZO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO PONCE...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FULVIA FLORES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GILBERTSANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GILBERTO ARROYO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GOD GOTME...RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
1931 GRACIELA GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 HOLLY PRESLEY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ISAURO RAMIREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JACK LARSON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JACOB HOPSON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JANESE PITCHER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JANETLEITCH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAVIER HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAVIER PACHECO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAY CHAVEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JENNIFER SCHERER-NASH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JESSE GONZALES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOHN TRAN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE CORTEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE ESQUIVIAS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE FONSECA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE MENDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE SALAZAR...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE VERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSEFA HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSEFINA SANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUAN ACEITUNO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUAN GUTIERREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUAN MARIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUVENAL MARTINEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KAROL CRUZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KEN RUZIC...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LAURA SANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LAZARO GALLEGOS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LETICIA FONSECA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LUIS ONTIVEROS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MAIRA GUADARRAMA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MANZANA INVESMENTS...INVESTMENTS
1931 MARGARITA LOMELI...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA MENDOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA ORTEGA...RESIDENTIAL
947
2022 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2022 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 4
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
Part 2 of 2
1931 MARINA ARRIAGA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MAXIMO MONTIEL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MEDINA REYES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MICHAEL POSTON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MICHELLE BARRETTO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MIGUEL IBARRA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MONICA NAVARRO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 OMAR FIGUEROA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RAFAEL REYES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RAUL HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RICARDO BARRAZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RICARDO LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RICHARD BALDWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROBERTO VEGA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROD AYALA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RODRIGO MORALES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROSA ALANIZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROSA MEDINA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROSANA GUERRERO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RUSS RUSSIKOFF...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SALVADOR OSORIO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SANDRA KANEKO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SANTOS DIAZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 STARLA RODGERS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 STEVE WEEDA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TEDDINE SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TEDEO IBARRA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TERRESSA FRAZIER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TERRY ORTIZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 VAUGHN REES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 VICTOR ESPINOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 WERNER OERTEL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 WILLIAM NICOL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 WILLIAM VAUGHAN...RESIDENTIAL
152 total records. Part 1 of 3
2200 JC PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO...PHOTOGRAPHERS-PORTRAIT
2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...RESTAURANTS
2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...CAFES
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...ESPRESSO & ESPRESSO BARS
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...FOODSCARRY OUT
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...COFFEE SHOPS
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...RESTAURANTS
2202 HOTTIES ORANGE LLC...RESTAURANTS
2202 JAMBA JUICE...RESTAURANTS
2202 JAMBA JUICE...JUICE BARS
2214 NOODLES CO...RESTAURANTS
2214 PANERA BREAD...RESTAURANTS
2229 MRS FIELD'S COOKIES...COOKIES & CRACKERS
2233 DR SWEETTOOTH...ICE CREAM PARLORS
2233 TACO BELL...RESTAURANTS
2233 TACO BELL...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2233 TACO BELL...CAFES
2233 TOGO'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2233 TOGO'S...CAFES
2233 TOGO'S...RESTAURANTS
2249 DUNN...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
2249 PRIME RATE MORTGAGE SVC INC...REAL ESTATE LOANS
2249 RAISING CANE'S...RESTAURANTS
2263 CATHAY BANK...BANKS
2265 MEGA SMOKE SHOP...CIGAR CIGARETTE & TOBACCO DEALERS-RETAIL 2265 MEGA SMOKE SHOP PLUS...TOBACCO STORES
2265 MOORE'S OF ORANGE...FANS-HOUSEHOLD
2265 MOORE'S OF ORANGE...VACUUM CLEANERS-HOUSEHOLD-DEALERS 2265 MOORE'S OF ORANGE...VACUUM CLEANERSREPAIRING & PARTS 2267 VILLA PARK NAILS...MANICURING
2271 TIKIYAKI...RESTAURANTS
2275 H&R BLOCK...TAX RETURN PREPARATION & FILING
2279 DESIMONE DELICATESSEN...DELICATESSENS
2279 PATAGONIA EMPANADAS...RESTAURANTS
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS...CLEANERS
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS...LAUNDRIES
2291 MARTEY, WILLIAM TDDS...DENTISTS
2294 COSTPLUS WORLD MARKET...FURNITURE ACCESSORIES & DECORW HOLESALE 2294 COSTPLUS WORLD MARKET...FURNITURE-DEALERS-RETAIL
2295 ABDOL MORADI...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ALFONSO ZAVALA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANDERS PETERSON...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANGELICA FERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANGELINA BERBER...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANTHONY CORREA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BEN MEDINA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BETTY JO PYNN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BROOKE COE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 CARPETCLEANING ORANGE...CARPET & RUG CLEANERS
2295 DANIEL KLEIN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DARRICK CHEE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DAVID WILKINS...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DEBORA HYPES...RESIDENTIAL
2295 GEORGE ERRINGTON...RESIDENTIAL
2295 GREG GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 HEATHER CLARK...RESIDENTIAL
2295 HUGO ESCOBAR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JEAN MACLEAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JESSICA TORRES...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JOEL CARR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JOEL PEREZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JOHN SARFATI...RESIDENTIAL
2295 KAREN CRAIG...RESIDENTIAL
2295 KARLA KOSLOWSKY...RESIDENTIAL
2295 KATHLEEN CLARK...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LARRY BUNCH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LAUREN HERTEL...RESIDENTIAL
948
2022 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2022 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 5
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
Part 2 of 3
2295 LI-TUNG CHANG...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LINDA GOULD...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LORENA VASQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LUIS ALVARADO...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LYNDA MAGUIRE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MAHIN ANGHA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MANUEL GUZMAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MARK VALENZUELA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MARY LEE LEONARD...RESIDENTIAL
2295 PAM MC DONOUGH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 PATRICIA BOWERS...RESIDENTIAL
2295 PETRA GILBERT...RESIDENTIAL
2295 STACI LAMPHEAR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 SUZANNE PLACE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 VIRGINIA BUNCH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 WALTER COE JR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 YING WANG...RESIDENTIAL
2300 JACKSON HEWITTTAX SVC...TAX RETURN PREPARATION & FILING 2300 JACKSON HEWITTTAX SVC WALMART...TAX RETURN PREPARATION & FILING
2300 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS
2300 MC DONALD'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2300 MC DONALD'S...CAFES
2300 MINUTE KEY...MARINE ENGINES-REPAIRING
2300 NATIONAL VISION...OPTOMETRISTS OD
2300 NGUYEN, TUAN...PHARMACISTS
2300 VISION CENTER ATWALMART...OPTOMETRISTS OD
2300 WALMART...PAINT-RETAIL
2300 WALMART...ECOMMERCE
2300 WALMART...DEPARTMENT STORES
2300 WALMART...HARDW ARERETAIL
2300 WALMARTCONNECTION CTR...CELLULAR TELEPHONES-EQUIPMENT & SUPLS 2300 WALMARTPHARMACY...PHARMACIES
2300 WALMARTPHOTO PRINTING...PHOTO FINISHING-RETAIL
2300 WALMARTVISION CTR...OPTICAL GOODS-RETAIL
2300 WALMARTVISION GLASSES...OPTICAL GOODS-RETAIL
2301 DANIELS TIRE SVC...AUTOMOBILE REPAIRING & SERVICE
2301 DANIELS TIRE SVC...TIREDEALERSUSED (W HLS)
2301 DANIELS TIRE SVC...TIRE-DEALERS-RETAIL
2318 PANDA EXPRESS...RESTAURANTS
2318 RUBIO'S FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2318 RUBIO'S FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...RESTAURANTS
2318 RUBIO'S FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...CAFES
2318 YOGURTLAND...YOGURT
2318 YOGURTLAND...FRANCHISING
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...CAFES
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...RESTAURANTS
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2341 VISTA PAINT...PAINTERS EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES (W HLS) 2341 VISTA PAINT...PAINTERS
2341 VISTA PAINT...HARDW ARERETAIL
2341 VISTA PAINT...PAINT-RETAIL
2343 MASSAGE CENTER...MASSAGE THERAPISTS
2343 MASSAGE CENTER...MASSAGE
2343 WELLNESS SPA...HEALTH SPAS
2345 GOODFELLAS TATTOO ARTDESIGN...TATTOOING
2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WASHES...AUTOMOBILE DETAIL & CLEAN-UP SERVICE 2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WASHES...CAR W ASHING & POLISHING
2375 ADTCUSTOMER SVC...SECURITY SYSTEMS
2375 BESTBUY...COMPUTER PARTS & SUPPLIES
2375 BESTBUY...ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES-RETAIL
2375 BESTBUY...CELLULAR TELEPHONES (SERVICES)
2376 LASH LOUNGE...COSMETICS & PERFUMES-RETAIL
2393 ORANGE VILLAGE DENTISTRY...DENTISTS
2393 VERNIS SAGE NAIL BAR...MANICURING
2401 MC DONALD'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2401 MC DONALD'S...CAFES
2401 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS
Part 3 of 3
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS...SPORTING GOODS-RETAIL
2469 A&W ALL AMERICAN FOOD...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2469 A&W RESTAURANTS...RESTAURANTS
2475 DRIVE ITAUTO GROUP...FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES
2490 BRAD'S VALERO...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL
2490 BRAD'S VALERO...AUTOMOBILE DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE
2490 BRAD'S VALERO...AUTOMOBILE SMOG CONTROL INSPECTIONS 2490 BRAD'S VALERO...ALTERNATIVE FUELS
2490 ORANGE MALL SHELL...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 2490 U HAUL NEIGHBORHOOD DEALER...TRUCK RENTING & LEASING 2490 U HAUL NEIGHBORHOOD DEALER...TRUCKDEALERSUSED
2493 R & M PACIFIC RIM INC...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS 2493 R M PACIFIC RIM INC...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 2493 TK SMOG CHECK AUTO REPAIR...AUTOMOBILE SMOG CONTROL INSPECTIONS 2500 JACK IN THE BOX...CAFES
2500 JACK IN THE BOX...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2500 JACK IN THE BOX...RESTAURANTS
949
2020 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2020 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 6
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1800 ADELINA VAQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ANGELES MENDOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ANTHONY CASCIANO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 BARBARA TANKERSLEY...RESIDENTIAL
1800 C CADENA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 CARE FREE PLANTS...PLANTS-RETAIL
1800 CARMEN HARPER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 CECIL NELUMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 DANIELLE FEWINGS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 DIPALI DOSHI...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ELAINE NELSON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 FRANCINE LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 FRANK SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
1800 FRANKIE SPENCER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 GILBERTO RODRIGUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 HARVEY NELSON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 HENRY ADAMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 IGNACIO CUELLAR...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JAMES WILLIAMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JANNIE BAUTISTA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JAVIER CERDA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOHN BAUTISTA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOHN HUDOBA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOSE BASURTO SANTOS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOSEPHINE JIMENEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JUDITH REEDER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 KAREN BEVER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 KATHLEEN URIOSTEGUI...RESIDENTIAL
1800 KIMBERLY GUTIERREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 MARINA FUENTES...RESIDENTIAL
1800 RALPH FENTON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 SANDRA BRAVO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 SARAH WARD...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VASQUEZ LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VICTORIA FLORES...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WENDY BALDRIDGE...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WILLIAM KELLY...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WORRY FREE SOLUTIONS...INSTRUCTIONAL CONSULTANTS
1801 BATES, DIANE G...MARRIAGE & FAMILY COUNSELORS
1801 BATES, DIANE G...COUNSELING SERVICES
1801 CORNERSTONE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH...HEALTH SERVICES
1801 ELEGANZA GROUP...REAL ESTATE
1801 LESTER, THOMAS C MD...MEDICAL & SURGICAL SVC ORGANIZATIONS 1801 LESTER, THOMAS C MD...PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS
1801 PEREIRA & MOFFATTLAW OFFICES...ATTORNEYS
1801 RE-PRO REALTY...REAL ESTATE
1801 RE-PRO REALTY...REAL ESTATE INSPECTION
1801 RICHARD MCGUCKIN MARRAGE...SOCIAL SERVICE & W ELFARE

ORGANIZATIONS
1801 US LAW CTR...LEGAL SERVICES
1815 24/7 COSMETIC & PARA-MED TATTO...PERMANENT MAKE-UP 1815 ADTSECURITY SVC...SECURITY SYSTEMS
1815 ADVANCED AVANTGARDE...PRODUCT DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 1815 ADVANCED AVANTGARDE...ECOMMERCE
1815 AQUA CONNECTINC...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
1815 AVANTGARDE...BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS
1815 OWNITGROUP...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
85 total records. Part 1 of 2
1931 ADALBERTO CORTEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ADELINA HERRERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 AFFIRMATIVE HANDYMAN SVC...HANDYMAN SERVICES
1931 ALEX AGUILAR...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ALFRED CAMPA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ALICIA VALLADOLID...RESIDENTIAL
1931 AMBER LANE...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANDREA MARTINEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANGELICA ZEPEDA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANTONIO ESPINOSA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANTONIO RAMIREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ARTURO PEREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 BRIAN SANDOVAL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CAL-AM PROPERTIES...REAL ESTATE
1931 CARLOS VELASCO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CASEY GELLER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CELIA ALVARADO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CHAN YANG...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CHRISTINA JIMENEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DELMY AMAYA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DEMETRIO CHOPIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ELIGIO MEJIA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ESTHER MACEDO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FABIOLA VARGAS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO PONCE...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FULVIA FLORES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GABRIELA MEDINA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GILBERTSANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GILBERTO ARROYO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GLORIA GOMEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GLORIA HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GOD GOTME...RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS
1931 GRACIELA GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GUADALUPE GUTIERREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GUADALUPE LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 HOLLY PRESLEY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ISAURO RAMIREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JACK LARSON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JANETLEITCH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAVIER HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAVIER PACHECO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAY CHAVEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JENNIFER SCHERER-NASH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JESSE GONZALES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOHN TRAN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE ARCEO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE ESQUIVIAS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE FONSECA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE MENDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE VERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSEFINA SANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSIE VAUGHAN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUAN ACEITUNO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUAN MARIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KAROL CRUZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KASSANDRA SOTO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KEN RUZIC...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LAURA SANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LEONOR OROZCO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LUIS ONTIVEROS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MAIRA GUADARRAMA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MANZANA INVESMENTS...INVESTMENTS
1931 MARIA MENDOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA ORTEGA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARINA ARRIAGA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MAXIMO MONTIEL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MEDINA REYES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MICHAEL POSTON...RESIDENTIAL
950
2020 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2020 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 7
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
Part 2 of 2
1931 MICHELLE BARRETTO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MONICA RUIZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RAUL HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RICHARD BALDWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROD AYALA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RODRIGO MORALES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROSA ALANIZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROSANA GUERRERO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RUSS RUSSIKOFF...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SALVADOR OSORIO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TEDDINE SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TERRESSA FRAZIER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TERRY ORTIZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TOMMIE ACEITUNO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 VICTOR ESPINOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 WILLIAM NICOL...RESIDENTIAL
152 total records. Part 1 of 3
2200 J C PENNEY CO...CLOTHING-RETAIL
2200 J C PENNEY CO...W OMEN'S APPARELRETAIL
2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO...PHOTOGRAPHERS-PASSPORT 2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO...VIDEO TAPES & DISCSRENTING & LEASING 2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO...PHOTOGRAPHERS-PORTRAIT 2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO...W EDDING PHOTOGRAPHERS 2200 JC PENNEY...DEPARTMENT STORES
2200 JC PENNEY...ECOMMERCE
2200 JC PENNEY SALON...HEALTH SPAS
2200 JC PENNEY SALON...BEAUTY SALONS
2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...RESTAURANTS
2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...CAFES
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...ESPRESSO & ESPRESSO BARS
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...RESTAURANTS
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...FOODSCARRY OUT
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...COFFEE SHOPS
2202 JAMBA JUICE...RESTAURANTS
2202 JAMBA JUICE...JUICE BARS
2214 NOODLES CO...RESTAURANTS
2214 PANERA BREAD...RESTAURANTS
2229 MRS FIELD'S COOKIES...COOKIES & CRACKERS
2233 DR SWEETTOOTH...ICE CREAM PARLORS
2233 TACO BELL...CAFES
2233 TACO BELL...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2233 TACO BELL...RESTAURANTS
2233 TOGO'S...CAFES
2233 TOGO'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2233 TOGO'S...RESTAURANTS
2249 DUNN...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
2249 PRIME RATE MORTGAGE SVC INC...REAL ESTATE LOANS
2249 RAISING CANE'S...RESTAURANTS
2263 CATHAY BANK...BANKS
2265 MEGA SMOKE SHOP...CIGAR CIGARETTE & TOBACCO DEALERS-RETAIL 2265 MOORE'S OF ORANGE...VACUUM CLEANERSREPAIRING & PARTS 2265 MOORE'S OF ORANGE...VACUUM CLEANERS-HOUSEHOLD-DEALERS 2265 MOORE'S OF ORANGE...FANS-HOUSEHOLD
2267 VILLA PARK NAILS...MANICURING
2271 TIKIYAKI...RESTAURANTS
2275 H&R BLOCK...TAX RETURN PREPARATION & FILING
2279 DESIMONE DELICATESSEN...DELICATESSENS
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS...LAUNDRIES
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS...CLEANERS
2291 MARTEY, WILLIAM TDDS...DENTISTS
2294 COSTPLUS WORLD MARKET...FURNITURE-DEALERS-RETAIL
2294 COSTPLUS WORLD MARKET...FURNITURE ACCESSORIES & DECORW HOLESALE 2295 ABDOL MORADI...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ALFONSO ZAVALA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANDERS PETERSON...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANGELICA FERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANGELINA BERBER...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANNETTE TURNHAM...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANTHONY CORREA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BARBARA SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BEN MEDINA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BETTY JO PYNN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BRIAN MACLEAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BROOKE COE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 CARPETCLEANING ORANGE...CARPET & RUG CLEANERS
2295 DANIEL KLEIN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DARRICK CHEE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DAVID WILKINS...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DEBORA HYPES...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DUNGJAI GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 GEORGE ERRINGTON...RESIDENTIAL
2295 HUGO ESCOBAR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JESSICA TORRES...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JOHN SARFATI...RESIDENTIAL
951
2020 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2020 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 8
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
Part 2 of 3
2295 KAREN CRAIG...RESIDENTIAL
2295 KARLA KOSLOWSKY...RESIDENTIAL
2295 KATHLEEN CLARK...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LARRY BUNCH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LI-TUNG CHANG...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LINDA GOULD...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LIZBETH LIRA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LORENA VASQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LUIS ALVARADO...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MAHIN ANGHA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MANUEL GUZMAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MARY LEE LEONARD...RESIDENTIAL
2295 PETRA GILBERT...RESIDENTIAL
2295 STACI LAMPHEAR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 STELLA BADOLIAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 SUZANNE PLACE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 YING WANG...RESIDENTIAL
2300 JACKSON HEWITTTAX SVC...TAX RETURN PREPARATION & FILING 2300 JACKSON HEWITTTAX SVC-WALMART...TAX RETURN PREPARATION & FILING
2300 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS
2300 MC DONALD'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2300 MC DONALD'S...CAFES
2300 NATIONAL VISION...OPTOMETRISTS OD
2300 NGUYEN, TUAN...PHARMACISTS
2300 VISION CENTER ATWALMART...OPTOMETRISTS OD
2300 WALMART...PAINT-RETAIL
2300 WALMART...DEPARTMENT STORES
2300 WALMART...ECOMMERCE
2300 WALMART...HARDW ARERETAIL
2300 WALMARTCONNECTION CTR...CELLULAR TELEPHONES-EQUIPMENT & SUPLS 2300 WALMARTPHARMACY...PHARMACIES
2300 WALMARTPHOTO PRINTING...PHOTO FINISHING-RETAIL
2300 WALMARTVISION GLASSES...OPTICAL GOODS-RETAIL
2300 WALMARTVISION CTR...OPTICAL GOODS-RETAIL
2301 DANIELS TIRE SVC...TIRE-DEALERS-RETAIL
2301 DANIELS TIRE SVC...TIREDEALERSUSED (W HLS)
2301 DANIELS TIRE SVC...AUTOMOBILE REPAIRING & SERVICE
2318 PANDA EXPRESS...RESTAURANTS
2318 RUBIO'S FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...CAFES
2318 RUBIO'S FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2318 RUBIO'S FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...RESTAURANTS
2318 YOGURTLAND...YOGURT
2318 YOGURTLAND...FRANCHISING
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...RESTAURANTS
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...CAFES
2341 VISTA PAINT...PAINT-RETAIL
2341 VISTA PAINT...PAINTERS EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES (W HLS) 2341 VISTA PAINT...PAINTERS
2341 VISTA PAINT...HARDW ARERETAIL
2343 MASSAGE CENTER...MASSAGE THERAPISTS
2343 MASSAGE CENTER...MASSAGE
2343 WELLNESS SPA...HEALTH SPAS
2345 GOODFELLAS TATTOO ARTDESIGN...TATTOOING
2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WASHES...CAR W ASHING & POLISHING
2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WASHES...AUTOMOBILE DETAIL & CLEAN-UP SERVICE 2375 ADT-CUSTOMER SVC...SECURITY SYSTEMS
2375 BESTBUY...COMPUTER PARTS & SUPPLIES
2375 BESTBUY...ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES-RETAIL
2375 BESTBUY...CELLULAR TELEPHONES (SERVICES)
2376 LASH LOUNGE...COSMETICS & PERFUMES-RETAIL
2393 ORANGE VILLAGE DENTISTRY...DENTISTS
2393 VERNIS SAGE NAIL BAR...MANICURING
2401 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS
2401 MC DONALD'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2401 MC DONALD'S...CAFES
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS...SPORTING GOODS-RETAIL
Part 3 of 3
2469 A&W ALL-AMERICAN FOOD...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2469 A&W RESTAURANTS...RESTAURANTS
2469 KFC...RESTAURANTS
2475 DRIVE ITAUTO GROUP...FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES
2490 BRAD'S VALERO...AUTOMOBILE DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE
2490 BRAD'S VALERO...AUTOMOBILE SMOG CONTROL INSPECTIONS 2490 BRAD'S VALERO...ALTERNATIVE FUELS
2490 BRAD'S VALERO...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL
2490 ORANGE MALL SHELL...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 2490 U-HAUL NEIGHBORHOOD DEALER...TRUCKDEALERSUSED
2490 U-HAUL NEIGHBORHOOD DEALER...TRUCK RENTING & LEASING 2493 R M PACIFIC RIM INC...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 2493 R & M PACIFIC RIM INC...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS 2493 TK SMOG CHECK AUTO REPAIR...AUTOMOBILE SMOG CONTROL INSPECTIONS 2500 JACK IN THE BOX...RESTAURANTS
2500 JACK IN THE BOX...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2500 JACK IN THE BOX...CAFES
952
2016 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2016 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 9
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1800 ADELINA LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ADELINA VAQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ADOLFO VICTORIO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ALEJANDRO MONGE...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ANGELES MENDOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ANTHONY CASCIANO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 BARBARA TANKERSLEY...RESIDENTIAL
1800 C CADENA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 CARMEN HARPER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 CECIL NELUMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 CHERYL PURCHASE...RESIDENTIAL
1800 DANIELLE FEWINGS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 DIPALI DOSHI...RESIDENTIAL
1800 ELAINE NELSON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 FRANK SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
1800 FRANKIE SPENCER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 GILBERTO RODRIGUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 HARVEY NELSON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 HENRY ADAMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JAMES WILLIAMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JANNIE BAUTISTA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JAVIER CERDA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOHN HUDOBA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOSE BASURTO SANTOS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOSEPHINE JIMENEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JUDITH SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
1800 KAREN BEVER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 KIMBERLY GUTIERREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 LAMPAIDA CASCIANO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 MARINA FUENTES...RESIDENTIAL
1800 RALPH FENTON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 RENATO BAUTISTA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 SANDRA BRAVO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 SARAH LOPEZ-BLANCO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 SARAH WARD...RESIDENTIAL
1800 THOMAS SPENCER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VALUE TRADE...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
1800 VASQUEZ LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VERALYNN ADAMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VERENICE WILLIAMS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VICTORIA FLORES...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WENDY BALDRIDGE...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WILLIAM KELLY...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WORRY FREE SOLUTIONS...INSTRUCTIONAL CONSULTANTS
1801 BATES, DIANE G...MARRIAGE & FAMILY COUNSELORS
1801 FORECLOSURE AID...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
1801 K & R CONSULTING...CONSULTANTS-BUSINESS NEC
1801 LESTER, THOMAS C MD...PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS
1801 MIRACLE CENTER OF CALIFORNIA...HYPNOTISTS
1801 ORANGE HOTPOINTREPAIR...APPLIANCE REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 1801 PEREIRA & MOFFATTLAW OFFICES...ATTORNEYS
1801 RE-PRO REALTY...REAL ESTATE
1801 RICHARD MCGUCKIN MARRAGE...SOCIAL SERVICE & W ELFARE

ORGANIZATIONS
1801 STONEBRAKER BOLLARD...OFFICES OF REAL ESTATE AGENTS & BROKERS 1815 24/7 COSMETIC & PARA-MED TATTO...PERMANENT MAKE-UP 1815 A D T-24 HOUR CUSTOMER SVC...SECURITY SYSTEMS
1815 ADTSECURITY SVC...SECURITY CONTROL EQUIP & SYSTEMS-W HLS 1815 ADTSECURITY SVC...SECURITY SYSTEMS
1815 ADVANCED AVANTGARDE...PRODUCT DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 1815 AVANTGARDE...BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS
1815 COLDWELL BANKER ESCROW...ESCROW SERVICE
1815 REPUBLIC REALTY SVC...REAL ESTATE
107 total records. Part 1 of 2
1931 ADALBERTO CORTEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ADELINA HERRERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 AFFIRMATIVE HANDYMAN SVC...HANDYMAN SERVICES
1931 ALEX AGUILAR...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ALFRED CAMPA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ALMA CORTEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 AMBER LANE...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANDREA MARTINEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANTONIO ESPINOSA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANTONIO RAMIREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ARIANA GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 AVELINA REYES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 BRIAN SANDOVAL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CAL-AM PROPERTIES...REAL ESTATE
1931 CARLOS LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CARLOS VELASCO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CAROLINA JIMENEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CARRIE HOPSON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CASEY GELLER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CELIA ALVARADO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CHAN YANG...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CHRISTINA JIMENEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DELMY AMAYA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DEMETRIO CHOPIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DIANE BALDWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DIAZ MENDOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 EDILBERTO MARTINEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ELIGIO MEJIA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ELIZABETH RODGERS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ESTHER MACEDO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO PONCE...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FULVIA FLORES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GABRIELA MEDINA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GILBERTSANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GLORIA CAMPA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GLORIA GOMEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GLORIA HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GRACIELA GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GUADALUPE LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 HOLLY PRESLEY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 HOMERO ORTIZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 INDEPENDENTAUTO GLASS...AUTOMOBILE GLASS-SERVICE & INSTALLATION 1931 ISAURO RAMIREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JACK LARSON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JACOB HOPSON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JANETLEITCH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAVIER HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAVIER PACHECO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAY CHAVEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JENNIFER SCHERER-NASH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JESSE GONZALES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE ESPINOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE ESQUIVIAS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE MEDINA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE MENDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE VERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSEFINA SANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSIE VAUGHAN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUAN ACEITUNO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUAN AGUILAR...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUAN MARIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JUVENAL MARTINEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KAROL CRUZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KASSANDRA SOTO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KEN RUZIC...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LAURA SANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
953
2016 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2016 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 10
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
Part 2 of 2
1931 LEONOR OROZCO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LUIS ONTIVEROS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LUIS SANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MAIRA GUADARRAMA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA JIMENEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA ORTEGA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA RAMIREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARINA ARRIAGA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MAXIMO MONTIEL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MEDINA REYES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MELCHOR HERRERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MICHAEL POSTON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MICHELLE BARRETTO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MONICA NAVARRO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MONICA RUIZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 NINFA CHAVEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 PEGGY HOPSON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 R O TRUCKING...TRUCKING
1931 RAFAEL REYES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 REINA MENDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RICHARD BALDWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROBERTO VEGA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROBIN SKARSTEN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROSANA GUERRERO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROTEL TOURS...TOURS-OPERATORS & PROMOTERS
1931 SALVADOR OSORIO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SANDRA GUERRERO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SANTOS DIAZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 STARLA RODGERS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SUSANA SOTO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SYLVIA MARIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TEDDINE SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TERRESSA FRAZIER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TOMAS GOMEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TOMMIE ACEITUNO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 VICTOR ESPINOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 VILMA MARTINEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 WILLIAM NICOL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 WILLIAM VAUGHAN...RESIDENTIAL
136 total records. Part 1 of 2
2200 J C PENNEY CO...CLOTHING-RETAIL
2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO...PHOTOGRAPHERS-PORTRAIT 2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO...PHOTOGRAPHERS-PASSPORT 2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...RESTAURANTS
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...COFFEE SHOPS
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...RESTAURANTS
2202 JAMBA JUICE...JUICE BARS
2202 VILLAGE ATORANGE...SHOPPING CENTERS & MALLS
2214 FAMOUS DAVE'S...RESTAURANTS
2214 FAMOUS DAVE'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2214 ORANGE CAR HOME LOCKSMITH...LOCKS & LOCKSMITHS
2214 PANERA BREAD...RESTAURANTS
2214 PANERA BREAD...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2229 MRS FIELD'S COOKIES...COOKIES & CRACKERS
2233 DR SWEETTOOTH...ICE CREAM PARLORS
2233 TACO BELL...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2233 TACO BELL...RESTAURANTS
2233 TOGO'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2233 TOGO'S...RESTAURANTS
2249 DUNN...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
2249 PRIME RATE MORTGAGE SVC INC...REAL ESTATE LOANS
2263 CATHAY BANK...BANKS
2265 MOORE'S OF ORANGE...FANS-HOUSEHOLD
2265 MOORE'S OF ORANGE...VACUUM CLEANERS-HOUSEHOLD-DEALERS 2267 VILLA PARK NAILS...MANICURING
2271 TIKIYAKI...RESTAURANTS
2271 WOK N GO...RESTAURANTS
2275 H&R BLOCK...TAX RETURN PREPARATION & FILING
2279 DESIMONE DELICATESSEN...DELICATESSENS
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS...CLEANERS
2291 ACE DENTAL...DENTISTS
2294 COSTPLUS WORLD MARKET...FURNITURE-DEALERS-RETAIL
2295 ABDOL MORADI...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ALEX OLSEN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ALFONSO ZAVALA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANDERS PETERSON...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANGELICA FERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANGELINA BERBER...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANNETTE TURNHAM...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ANTHONY CORREA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BARBARA SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BEN MEDINA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BETTY JO PYNN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BETTY YONEMURA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BRIAN MACLEAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BROOKE COE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 CARPETCLEANING ORANGE...CARPET & RUG CLEANERS
2295 CATALINA ZAVALA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 CRAIG SMITH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DANIEL KLEIN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DARRICK CHEE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DAVID COE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DAVID WILKINS...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DEBORA HYPES...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DUNGJAI GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 GEORGE ERRINGTON...RESIDENTIAL
2295 GERARDO LORANCA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 GREG GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 HEATHER CLARK...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JEAN MACLEAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JESSICA PETERSON...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JESSICA TORRES...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JOEL PEREZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JOHN SARFATI...RESIDENTIAL
2295 KARLA KOSLOWSKY...RESIDENTIAL
2295 KATHLEEN CLARK...RESIDENTIAL
2295 KATIE KLEIN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 KAY ERRINGTON...RESIDENTIAL
954
2016 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2012 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 11
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
Part 2 of 2
2295 LARRY BUNCH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LI-TUNG CHANG...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LINDA COE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LIZBETH LIRA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LORENA VASQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LUIS ALVARADO...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MAHIN ANGHA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MANUEL GUZMAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MARIA VASQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MARTHA LORANCA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MARY LEE LEONARD...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MATTOX ELECTRIC...ELECTRIC CONTRACTORS
2295 MAURICIO GALVAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 NANCY KLEIN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 PETRA GILBERT...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ROY YONEMURA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 STACI LAMPHEAR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 SUZANNE PLACE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 VIRGINIA BUNCH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 WALTER COE JR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 YING WANG...RESIDENTIAL
2300 COINSTAR...COIN & BILL COUNTING/SORTING SVC KIOSKS 2300 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS
2300 MC DONALD'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2300 VISION CENTER ATWALMART...OPTICAL GOODS STORES
2300 VISION CENTER ATWALMART...OPTICAL GOODS-RETAIL
2300 VISION CENTER ATWALMART...OPTOMETRISTS OD
2300 WALMART...DEPARTMENT STORES
2300 WALMART...PAINT-RETAIL
2300 WALMARTCONNECTION CTR...CELLULAR TELEPHONES-EQUIPMENT & SUPLS 2301 DANIELS TIRE SVC...GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR
2301 DANIELS TIRE SVC...TIRE-DEALERS-RETAIL
2318 PANDA EXPRESS...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2318 PANDA EXPRESS...RESTAURANTS
2318 RUBIO'S FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...RESTAURANTS
2318 RUBIO'S FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2318 YOGURTLAND...YOGURT
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...RESTAURANTS
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2341 VISTA PAINT...PAINTERS EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES (W HLS) 2341 VISTA PAINT...PAINT-RETAIL
2343 MASSAGE CENTER...MASSAGE
2345 GOODFELLAS TATTOO ARTDESIGN...TATTOOING
2347 GOODFELLAS VAPORS...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WASHES...AUTOMOBILE DETAIL & CLEAN-UP SERVICE 2375 ADT-CUSTOMER SVC...SECURITY SYSTEMS
2375 BESTBUY...CELLULAR TELEPHONES (SERVICES)
2375 BESTBUY...ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES-RETAIL
2393 CALICO CORNERS CALICO HOME...FABRIC SHOPS
2393 CALICO CORNERS CALICO HOME...E-COMMERCE
2393 CASSY'S BEAUTY EVOLUTION...BEAUTY SALONS-EQUIPMENT & SUPLS (W HLS) 2401 MC DONALD'S...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2401 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS...SPORTING GOODS-RETAIL
2469 A&W ALL-AMERICAN FOOD...FOODS-CARRY OUT
2469 A&W RESTAURANTS...RESTAURANTS
2475 DRIVEITTITLE LOANS...SALES FINANCING
2475 DRIVEITTITLE LOANS...AUTOMOBILE TITLE LOANS
2490 BRAD'S VALERO...AUTOMOBILE SMOG CONTROL INSPECTIONS 2490 BRAD'S VALERO...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL
2490 ORANGE MALL SHELL...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 2490 U-HAUL NEIGHBORHOOD DEALER...TRUCK RENTING & LEASING 2492 AMAR GARAGE DOOR & REPAIRS...DOORS-GARAGE
2493 R & M PACIFIC RIM INC...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS 2493 TK SMOG CHECK AUTO REPAIR...AUTOMOBILE SMOG CONTROL INSPECTIONS 2500 JACK IN THE BOX...RESTAURANTS
2500 JACK IN THE BOX...FOODS-CARRY OUT
1800 A VASQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 C CADENA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 GARIBAY ELIZABETH...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JUDITH REEDER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 M RAMIREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 MELISSA DIAL...RESIDENTIAL
1800 NICKEL PAINTING...PAINTERS
1800 SANTOS BASURTO...RESIDENTIAL
1801 BARRON & ASSOC...LOAN BROKERAGE
1801 CORNERSTONE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH...PSYCHOLOGISTS
1801 FORECLOSURE AID...NONCLASSIFIED ESTABLISHMENTS
1801 K & R CONSULTING...CONSULTANTS-BUSINESS NEC
1801 RE-PRO REALTY...REAL ESTATE
1815 ADT...SECURITY CONTROL EQUIP & SYSTEMS-W HLS
1815 ADVANCED AVANTGARDE...PRODUCT DESIGN/DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 1815 BLUESHORE FINANCIAL HOME MTG...REAL ESTATE LOANS
955
2012 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2012 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 12
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1931 AFFIRMATIVE HANDYMAN SVC...HANDYMAN SERVICES
1931 ALFONSO VASQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANTONIO MORENO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 BARABARA TILLMAN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 BIDDY TRAN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CAL-AM PROPERTIES...REAL ESTATE
1931 CARLOS PACHECO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DIANA BALOWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DONG NGUYEN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO PONCE...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GALLEGOS VAZQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GLENDA GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 HERBER GALBES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JANESE PITCHER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JESS GUADARRAMA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE CORTES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE MEDRANO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KAROL CRUZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LEAH MORENO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LILIA CRUZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LORENZO NAVARRO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MANUEL MORA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARCELINO CRUZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA MEDRANO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MICHAEL BALDWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MIGUEL CABRERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MIRANDA ENRIQUETA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 NAYELI VASQUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 NINFA CHAVEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ORANGE MOBILE HOME PARK...MOBILE HOMES-PARKS & COMMUNITIES 1931 P LATHAO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 PATRICIA MORENO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 R O TRUCKING...TRUCKING
1931 RICHARD BALDWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RODOLFO BAUTISTA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROSALVA CRISTOBAL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROSANA GUERRERO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SALVADOR OSORIO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SAMUEL ALEJO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SHARON PITCHER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SUSANA SOTO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TERESA MORENO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 VANESSA REYNOSA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 VICTOR AGUILA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 VILMA CABRERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 WAYNE GUNNINGHAM...RESIDENTIAL
1931 YOSHIKO CRUZ...RESIDENTIAL
2200 J C PENNEY CO...DEPARTMENT STORES
2200 J C PENNEY SALON...BEAUTY SALONS
2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...RESTAURANTS
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...COFFEE SHOPS
2202 JAMBA JUICE...JUICE BARS
2202 VILLAGE ATORANGE...SHOPPING CENTERS & MALLS
2214 FAMOUS DAVE'S...RESTAURANTS
2214 PANERA BREAD...RESTAURANTS
2233 TACO BELL...RESTAURANTS
2233 TOGO'S...RESTAURANTS
2249 DUNN, JAY...REAL ESTATE
2249 PRIME RATE MORTGAGE SVC INC...REAL ESTATE LOANS
2263 CATHAY BANK...BANKS
2265 MOORE'S OF ORANGE...SEW ING MACHINES-HOUSEHOLD
2267 VILLA PARK NAILS...MANICURING
2275 H&R BLOCK...TAX RETURN PREPARATION & FILING
2279 DESIMONE DELICATESSEN...DELICATESSENS
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS...CLEANERS
2291 ACE DENTAL...DENTISTS
2291 ORTHO MATTRESS...MATTRESSES
2295 BETTY PYNN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BRENDA TERRY...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BROOKE COE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DAVID COE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JEFF MOLLE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JOSEPH MEDINA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LETICIA JIMINEZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LINDA COE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 LINDA GOULD...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MARIETTA DODD...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MATTOX ELECTRIC...ELECTRIC CONTRACTORS
2295 QUALITY PAINTING PLUS...PAINTERS
2295 WALTER COE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 WILLIAM WOOD...RESIDENTIAL
2300 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS
2300 REDBOX...VIDEO RENTAL KIOSKS
2300 VISION CENTER ATWALMART...OPTICAL GOODS-RETAIL
2300 WALMART...DEPARTMENT STORES
2300 WALMARTCONNECTION CTR...CELLULAR TELEPHONES-EQUIPMENT & SUPLS 2301 DANIELS TIRE SVC...TIRE-DEALERS-RETAIL
2301 HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF ORANGE CO...AUTOMOBILE REPAIRING & SERVICE 2318 FATBURGER...RESTAURANTS
2318 FUJI GRILL...RESTAURANTS
2318 RUBIO'S FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...RESTAURANTS
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...RESTAURANTS
2341 VISTA PAINT...PAINT-RETAIL
2343 MASSAGE CENTER...MASSAGE
2345 GOOD FELLAS TATTOO ART...TATTOOING
2375 BESTBUY...ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES-RETAIL
2375 ITZ SPORTS...BOW LING LANE EQUIPMENT & SUPLS (W HLS) 2393 CALICO CORNERS CALICO HOME...FABRIC SHOPS
2393 CASSY'S BEAUTY EVOLUTION...COSMETICS & PERFUMES-RETAIL 2401 MC DONALD'S...RESTAURANTS
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS...SPORTING GOODS-RETAIL
2469 A&W ALL-AMERICAN FOOD...RESTAURANTS
2490 BRAD'S VALERO...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL
2490 U-HAUL NEIGHBORHOOD DEALER...TRUCK RENTING & LEASING 2493 ARCO MART...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL
2493 GEORGE NIMEH...RESIDENTIAL
2500 JACK IN THE BOX...RESTAURANTS
956
2008 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2008 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 13
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1800 ANABELLE SORIA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 AVALON GLOBAL FINANCIAL SVC...INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICE 1800 CHARLES BLASCHAK...RESIDENTIAL
1800 EDDIE IRWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1800 EDWARD J GUZMAN...RESIDENTIAL
1800 G TWINTERS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 GILBER RODRIGUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 GREGORY THOMSON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 J B WHITTAKER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JANICE LAKE...RESIDENTIAL
1800 JOHN LUCAS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 LISA M WAGNER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 MARIA G AMEZCUA...RESIDENTIAL
1800 O GUZMAN...RESIDENTIAL
1800 PARK 72...LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS
1800 PARK 72...PLASTER,DRYW ALL W ORK
1800 PEPE RALPH...LAW N/GARDEN SERVICES LANDSCAPE SERVICES 1800 RALPH PEPE...RESIDENTIAL
1800 THOMAS K IRWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1800 THOMAS SCHNEIDER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 TONY CASCIANO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VASQUEZ A LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WILLIAM F KELLY...RESIDENTIAL
1801 CA CENTRAL ACADEMY ORANGE...ELEMENTARY/SECONDARY SCHOOL 1801 E R E S I N COM...W HOL PLASTIC MATERIALS/SHAPES
1801 RE-PRO REALTY...REAL ESTATE AGT,MGR
1801 SUPERIOR CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION...CONCRETE W ORK
1815 ALLCO MILLWORK PRODUCTS...MILLW ORK (MANUFACTURERS) 1815 BLUESHORE FINANCIAL HOME MTG...MORTGAGE BANKERS
1815 DEFENDER SECURITY INC...ELECTRIC ALARMS
1815 FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP...INSURANCE AGENTS,BRKR
1815 FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP...INSURANCE
1815 INTEGRITY ALARMS...ELECTRIC ALARMS
1815 MILTCPA BRACKEN...RESIDENTIAL
1815 TWENTY FOUR SEVEN...MISC PERSONAL SVS
1931 ALICIA VALLADOLID...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ALVARADO G PEREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ANDREA C GORDON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 BALTAZAR LUCENA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 BERTHA LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CARL IRVIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CARLOS CARRILLO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CARLOS R VELASCO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CHELO BOCANEGRA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DONNA M VANOVER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 E J PERKINS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 EDGAR MUNOZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ELLA LIETZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ERASMO S MEZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FERNANDO R GONZALES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FLORES J LEON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO & BARBARA HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO REYES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANK W LINDQUIST...RESIDENTIAL
1931 G K SANDERS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GLORIA PEREA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GUSTAVO POKTZIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 J R BISCHOF...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAMES S RODRIGUES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAMES V STRICKLEY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAVIER ARISTA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JEANNE SANNER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JEFFREY L JOSEPH...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE E TEJEDA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE ESPINOZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOSE L GONZALEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KARINA B FONTAINE...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KENNETH J CARSON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KRISTEN OSLUND...RESIDENTIAL
1931 L FONSECA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LEAH A MURRIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LINDA WEBER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LOIS QUIRK...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LUCIA GUTIERREZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA C CASTILLO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA C CORONEL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA D SALAZAR...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA MEDRANO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARTHA GONZALEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MELISSA A DIAL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MENEZ A LUEVANO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MOISES MARTINEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MOLLY A BEANLAND...RESIDENTIAL
1931 NINFA CHAVEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 OLIVIA NAVARRO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ORANGE MOBILE HOME PARK...MOBILE HM SITE OPER
1931 R O TRUCKING...TRUCKING
1931 RAQUEL MALDONADO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RAYMOND W ZITNEY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RICHARD BALDWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RICHARD L BRATT...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ROB SKINLO...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RUSS & PHYLLIS RUSSIKOFF...RESIDENTIAL
1931 S E KELLER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 S M LANDMESSER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SIXTO SR SILVA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 THERESA F CAMPOS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 TREE DOERS...SHRUB/TREE SERVICES
1931 WARNICK PAIGE...RESIDENTIAL
957
2008 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2008 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 14
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
102 total records. Part 1 of 2
2200 AAA LOCKSMITH...LOCK AND KEY SERVICES
2200 J C PENNEY BEAUTY SALON...HAIRDRESSERS
2200 J C PENNEY CO INC...DEPARTMENT STORES
2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO...PHOTO STUDIO
2200 JC PENNEY...DEPARTMENT STORE
2202 CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL...MEXICAN MENU
2202 COFFEE BEAN & TEA LEAF...COFFEE SHOP
2202 JAMBA JUICE...QUICK SERV SNACK/COOKIE/DRN
2202 VILLAGE ATORANGE...SHOPPNG CTR OPER
2214 PANERA BREAD...QUICK SERV SANDW ICH/DELI
2214 POMODORO CUCINA ITALIANA...EATING PLACES
2233 COLD STONE CREAMERY...QUICK SERV ICE CREAM/YOGURT
2233 TACO BELL...QUICK SERV MEXICAN
2233 TOGOS EATERY...CAFE/DINER/FAMILY REST
2249 COLE NORMA ANNE-7 GABLES RE...REAL ESTATE AGENT/MANAGER 2249 GLEN PATRICK...REAL ESTATE AGENT/MANAGER
2249 GLEN PATRICK...RESIDENTIAL
2249 HAL SCHIEGEL PRUDENTIAL REALTY...REAL ESTATE AGT,MGR 2249 JAY DUNN...REAL ESTATE AGT,MGR
2249 JAY DUNN...REAL ESTATE AGENT/MANAGER
2249 JAY DUNN...RESIDENTIAL
2249 MARILYN JOHNSON...RESIDENTIAL
2249 ORANGE TREE REALTY INC...REAL ESTATE AGENT/MANAGER 2249 PRIME RATE MORTGAGE SVC INC...MORTGAGE BANKERS
2249 PRUDENTIAL BUSINESS SALES...BROKERS' SERVICES
2249 PRUDENTIAL CALIFORNIA REALTY...REAL ESTATE AGT,MGR 2263 CATHAY BANK...BANKS
2263 CATHAY BANK...NATIONAL COML BANKS
2265 MOORES CEILING FAN CTR...SEW ING MACHINES
2265 MOORES OF ORANGE...W HOL APPLIANCES/TV/RADIO RET HOUSEHOLD

APPLIANCES
2265 MOORES VACUUM CTR...VACUUM CLEANERS
2267 VILLA PARK NAILS...BEAUTY SHOPS
2279 EDDYS SANDWICH...QUICK SERV SANDW ICH/DELI
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS...GMT PRESSG,CLRS AGT
2291 ACE DENTAL...DENTISTS
2291 ACE DENTAL...DENTISTS OFF,CLINIC
2291 ORTHO MATTRESS...BEDDINGS AND LINENS
2295 CO-CO PALMS...LAW N,GARDEN EQUIP
2295 DAN KLEIN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DAN RATZLAFF...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DAVE WILKINS...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DEBORA E HYPES...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DOMINQUEZ E FLORES...RESIDENTIAL
2295 ELIZABETH G MCCLURE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 FAZONG YE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 GERARDO LORANCA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 GLENN MATTOX...RESIDENTIAL
2295 H A LAWRENCE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 HERBERTR GOFF...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JAMES W OBLEDA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JEAN DIAZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JEAN MACLEAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 K A MURPHY...RESIDENTIAL
2295 L L PERRERO...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MIGUEL FERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 N A SLOMAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 P GILBERT...RESIDENTIAL
2295 PAM YOUNG...RESIDENTIAL
2295 RODNEY M VLIET...RESIDENTIAL
2295 S ESCOBAR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 SHIRLEY A STRONG...RESIDENTIAL
2295 THEODORE W HALUNEN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 WALTER HOUTZ...RESIDENTIAL
2300 AT&TWIRELESS...RADIOTELEPHONE COMMUNICATION
2300 MC DONALDS HAMBURGERS...QUICK SERV BURGER
2300 WAL-MART...DEPARTMENT STORE
2300 WAL-MARTDISCOUNTCITIES...DEPT STORES DISCOUNT
2300 WAL-MARTVISION CTR...OPTICAL GOODS STRS
Part 2 of 2
2301 HOLLYWOOD TIRE...AUTOMOTIVE TIRES
2318 FATBURGER...RESTAURANTS
2318 FATBURGER...QUICK SERV BURGER
2318 FUJI GRILL...EATING PLACES
2318 LOCKSMITH ASSISTANCE IN ORANGE...LOCK AND KEY SERVICES 2318 RUBIOS FRESH MEXICAN GRILL...QUICK SERV MEXICAN
2330 OLIVE GARDEN...EATING PLACE DRINKING PLACE
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITALIAN RSTRNT...ITALIAN MENU
2341 VISTA PAINTWINDOW & WLCVRNGS...PAINT,PAINTING SUPPS 2343 MASSAGE CENTER...MASSAGE THERAPISTS
2343 MASSAGE CENTER...MISC PERSONAL SERVICES
2345 BOX DEPOT...TRUCKING OPERATOR-NONLOCAL LOCAL TRUCKING OPERATOR 2347 SUPER NAILS...HAIRDRESSERS
2375 BRUNSWICK CORP...BOW LING CENTERS
2375 IN THE ZONE PRO SHOP...W HOL SPORTING/RECREATIONAL GOODS 2375 ITZ SPORTS...SPG,RECREATIONAL GD
2393 CALICO CORNERS...FAB STORES PIECE GDS
2393 CALICO CORNERS...FABRIC SHOPS
2393 CASSYS BEAUTY EVOLUTION...TOILETRIES,COSM,PERF
2401 MC DONALDS HAMBURGERS...QUICK SERV BURGER
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS...SPORTING GOODS-RETAIL
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS...SPORTING GDS & BCY
2469 KFC...QUICK SERV CHICKEN
2475 MISSION FINANCIAL SVC CO...FINANCIAL PLANNING CONSULTANTS 2475 MISSION FINANCIAL SVC CO...INVESTMENT ADVICE
2475 MISSION FINANCIAL SVC CORP...AUTO & CONSUMER FINANCE 2490 BRADS EXXON...GASOLINE SV STATION
2490 BRADS ORANGE EXXON...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL 2490 U-HAUL CO...TRUCK RENTAL & LSG
2493 ARCO...GASOLINE SV STATION
2493 ARCO...SERVICE STATIONS-GASOLINE & OIL
2493 ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY...NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION 2493 GEORGE NIMEH...RESIDENTIAL
2500 JACK IN THE BOX...QUICK SERV BURGER
958
2003 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2003 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 15
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1800 B NESTANDE...RESIDENTIAL
1800 CHARLES BLASCHAK...RESIDENTIAL
1800 E E LONG...RESIDENTIAL
1800 EDDIE IRWIN...RESIDENTIAL
1800 G TWINTERS...RESIDENTIAL
1800 GREGORY THOMSON...RESIDENTIAL
1800 J B WHITTAKER...RESIDENTIAL
1800 M L IBACH...RESIDENTIAL
1800 MARIA GONZALEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 TONY CASCIANO...RESIDENTIAL
1800 VASQUEZ A LOPEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1800 WILLIAM F KELLY...RESIDENTIAL
1801 BASIC RIGHTS SVC...SERVICES, NEC, NEC
1801 CALIFORNIA FACTORS & FINANCE
1801 COMMERCIAL FINANCE GROUP...W ORKING CAPITAL FINANCING 1801 DIANE G BATES...RESIDENTIAL
1801 E RESIN.COM
1801 EDWARD R GARCIA...RESIDENTIAL
1801 EDWARDS & ASSOC...INDUSTRIAL AND LABOR CONSULTING SERVICES 1801 FRANK PARILLO & ASSOC
1801 PMJ & ASSOC
1801 VAN AMBULETTE C MEDI...RESIDENTIAL
1815 A-PLUS SYSTEMS
1815 ADVANCED ORAL HYGIENE...SPECIALIZED DENTAL PRACTITIONERS 1815 BIGNER INSURANCE
1815 FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP
1815 NUNES INSURANCE SVC
1931 ANDREW MCLAUGHLIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 B SWENSON...RESIDENTIAL
1931 BARBARA CORROTHERS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 BARRY & VICTORIA TACKETT...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CARL IRVIN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 CHUCK PADDOCK...RESIDENTIAL
1931 DORA SANJUAN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 E DAVIES...RESIDENTIAL
1931 E J PERKINS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 E TCLEARY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 EARROLL CHEVALIER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ERASMO S MEZA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 F C PHILLIPS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANCISCO & BARBARA HERNANDEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRANK KIEFER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 FRED W MANULA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 G K SANDERS...RESIDENTIAL
1931 GEORGE C BIEBER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 HOWARD A MUDGE...RESIDENTIAL
1931 J B MOLLICONE...RESIDENTIAL
1931 J H BURK...RESIDENTIAL
1931 J R BISCHOF...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAMES STANFILL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JAMES STRICKLEY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JEANNE SANNER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOE & ALICE SHAW...RESIDENTIAL
1931 JOHN KRAFT...RESIDENTIAL
1931 KRISTI L GRAY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 L FONSECA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 L HOLMAN...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LEE A BLANCHARD...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LETICIA OLVERA...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LOIS QUIRK...RESIDENTIAL
1931 LUIS G SANCHEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 M F GARNETT...RESIDENTIAL
1931 M R GILLEY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 M RODRIGUEZ...RESIDENTIAL
1931 MARIA D VILLARREAL...RESIDENTIAL
1931 ORANGE MOBILE HOME PARK
1931 RAYMOND W ZITNEY...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RICHARD L BRATT...RESIDENTIAL
1931 RUSS & PHYLLIS RUSSIKOFF...RESIDENTIAL
1931 S E KELLER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 S M LANDMESSER...RESIDENTIAL
1931 SILVIA SOTELO...RESIDENTIAL
959
2003 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
2003 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: DIGITAL BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Page: 16
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
71 total records. Part 1 of 2
2200 J C PENNEY CO
2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO
2200 SEE'S CANDIES
2206 BUSY BEE ORIENTAL FOOD...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS 2233 COLD STONE CREAMERY...FAST FOOD RESTAURANTS AND STANDS 2235 AFTERTHOUGHTS
2249 COLE NORMAN ANNE
2249 DUNN JAY
2249 GLEN R PATRICK...RESIDENTIAL
2249 MELANIE GALLEGOS...RESIDENTIAL
2249 ORANGE TREE REALTY
2249 PATRICK GLEN
2249 PRUDENTIAL CALIFORNIA REALTY
2249 SEVEN GABLES REALTY
2263 GENERAL BANK
2265 MOORE'S CEILING FAN CTR
2265 MOORE'S SEWING MACHINE CTRS...MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING ITEM REPAIR

SERVICES
2265 MOORE'S VACUUM CTR
2267 VILLA PARK NAILS...BEAUTY SCHOOLS
2269 ORANGE SMOKE SHOP
2271 N G WOK...RESIDENTIAL
2271 WOK N GO...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS
2275 H & R BLOCK TAX SVC
2279 TOGO'S EATERY...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS...LAUNDRY AND DRYCLEANER AGENTS
2291 ORTHO MATTRESS
2295 ARMANDO SILVA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 BENNY PALERMO...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DAN KLEIN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DAN RATZLAFF...RESIDENTIAL
2295 DEBORA E HYPES...RESIDENTIAL
2295 EULA SPELLMAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 FAZONG YE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 GLENN MATTOX...RESIDENTIAL
2295 H A LAWRENCE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 J K ROTH...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JEAN DIAZ...RESIDENTIAL
2295 JEAN MACLEAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 MARTY MEDINA...RESIDENTIAL
2295 N A SLOMAN...RESIDENTIAL
2295 N BRAVO...RESIDENTIAL
2295 P GILBERT...RESIDENTIAL
2295 RODNEY M VLIET...RESIDENTIAL
2295 S ESCOBAR...RESIDENTIAL
2295 S PIERCE...RESIDENTIAL
2295 SHIRLEY A STRONG...RESIDENTIAL
2295 THEODORE W HALUNEN...RESIDENTIAL
2300 MC DONALD'S...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS
2300 WAL-MART...PHOTOGRAPHIC SERVICES
2300 WAL-MARTVISION CTR...SPECIALIZED OPTOMETRISTS
2301 HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF ORANGE CNTY
2318 DRAGON BOWL...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS
2318 FATBURGER...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS
2318 RUBIO'S BAJA GRILL...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS 2330 OLIVE GARDEN...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS
2341 VISTA PAINTWINDOW & WLCVRNGS
2345 SNOW'S AFFORDABLE MOVING CO
2347 SUPER NAIL...BEAUTY SCHOOLS
2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WASHES
2375 IN THE ZONE PRO SHOP...HUNTING EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES 2375 ORANGE BOWL
2393 C2 REPROGRAPHICS...PROMOTIONAL PRINTING, LITHOGRAPHIC 2393 CALICO CORNERS...SEW ING AND NEEDLEW ORK
2393 CORNERS CALICO...RESIDENTIAL
2401 MC DONALD'S...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS
2469 KFC...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS
2475 MISSION FINANCIAL SVC...AUTOMOBILE AND CONSUMER FINANCE COMPANIES Part 2 of 2
2490 BRAD'S ORANGE EXXON...ENGINE REPAIR
2493 ARCO
2500 JACK IN THE BOX...STEAK AND BARBECUE RESTAURANTS
960
2001 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
2001 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 17
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1402 XXXX
1800 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1800 PARK 72 APTS
1801 CA FACTORS & FINANCE
1801 COMMERCIAL FINANCE GROUP
1801 E - RESIN COM
1801 EL YEAGER CONSTRUCTION
1801 P M J & INSURANCE SERVICES
1801 PARILLO FRANK & ASSOC
1801 PRINTCONSULTANTS INC
1801 URE DAVID
1815 A PLUS SYSTEMS
1815 ALGER GAIL
1815 BIGNER INSURANCE AGENCY
1815 NUNES TOM - AUTHRZD BL CRS AGENT
1815 PENICHE & ASSOCIATES
1820 ELFSTRUM VIC REV
1820 INDEPENDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
1820 ORANGE VILLA BIBLE CHURCH
1931 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1931 ORANGE MOBILE HM PK
2229 XXXX
2280 GRIMM HERBERT
961
2001 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: HAINES
2001 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 18
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
77 total records. Part 1 of 2
2191 TARGETPHOTO PROCESSING LAB
2191 TARGETSTORES
2200 J C PENNEY
2200 J C PENNEY CATALOG ORDERS
2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAITSTUDIO
2200 J C PENNEY STYLING SALON
2200 SEES CANDIES
2225 XXXX
2233 XXXX
2246 XXXX
2249 COLE NORMA ANNE - 7 GBLS RL EST
2249 DONOFRIO LOUIS
2249 DUNN JAY RL EST
2249 JOHNSON MARILYN
2249 ORANGE TREE REALTY
2249 PATRICK GLEN
2249 PRUDENTL CA REALTY
2263 GENERAL BANK
2265 MOORE'S SEWING MACHINE & VACM CT
2265 MOORES CEILING FAN CENTERS
2267 VILLA PARK NAILS
2269 SOUTHERN STATE INSURANCE
2271 WOK N GO
2275 BLOCK H & R
2279 TOGO'S EATERY
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS
2287 XXXX
2291 ORTHO MATTRESS
2295 APARTMENTS
2295 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
2300 MCDONALDS RESTAURNT
2300 WAL MART1 HR PHOTO
2300 WAL MARTMAIN STORE
2300 WAL MARTPHARMACY
2300 WAL MARTVISION CENTER
2301 GOODYEAR TIRE DLRS
2301 HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF ORANGE CO
2318 DRAGON BOWL
2318 FATBURGER
2318 RUBIOS RESTAURANT
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITLN
2332 SAS COMFORTSHOE STORE
2332 SAS SHOES
2341 JACOBSON WALTER
2341 VISTA PNT& WLLCVRNG
2343 LEGACY INTERNATIONAL REALTY
2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WSH
2356 XXXX
2364 XXXX
2368 XXXX
2375 BRUNSWICK ORANG BWL
2375 IN THE ZONE PRO SHOP
2375 ORANGE BOWL
2378 XXXX
2380 XXXX
2391 XXXX
2393 CALICO CORNERS
2393 KIDS CORNER GOOD NITE SLEEP CT
2401 MCDONALDS RESTAURNT
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GDS
2445 PIVETTHOWARD
2469 FAINBARG STEVEN
2469 K F C
2469 KFC DINE IN OR CARRYOUT
2475 ANAHEIM FINANCIAL SERVICES
2475 MISSION FINANCIAL SERVICES
2475 WAUGH FRED
2490 BRADS ORANGE EXXON
2490 ORANGE MALL SHELL
Part 2 of 2
2490 SIEGEL BRAD
2493 NIMEH GEORGE
2495 XXXX
2497 XXXX
2500 FISHMAN ALEX
2500 JACK IN THE BOX
2512 COLOR TILE & CARPET
2512 ROCKLER
962
1996 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
1996 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 19
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1402 XXXX
1420 XXXX
1800 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1800 PARK 72 APTS
1800 PEPE RALPH
1801 BATES DIANE G MFCC
1801 CA FACTORS & FINANCE
1801 EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES
1801 GARCIA EDWARD R
1801 MEDI VAN AMBULETTE
1801 PARILLO FRANK & ASSOC
1801 PATRICIA S JONG & ASC
1801 SOVEREIGN EMP BENFT
1815 A PLUS SYSTEMS
1815 DEALER RSRCS INTL
1820 ELFSTRUM VIC REV
1820 INDEPNC CHRISTN SCH
1820 ORANGE VILLA BIBLE
1931 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1931 ORNGE TRVLDG MBL PK
2229 XXXX
2342 LEE H
963
1996 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: HAINES
1996 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 20
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
81 total records. Part 1 of 2
2190 XXXX
2191 TARGETSTORES
2200 J C PENNEY CATALOG
2200 J C PENNEY PORTRAIT
2200 J C PENNEY SALON
2200 J C PENNEY STORE
2233 XXXX
2246 XXXX
2249 DUNN JAY
2249 GALLEGOS MELANIE
2249 ORANGE TREE REALTY
2249 PATRICK GLEN
2249 PRIME RATE MRTG
2263 GENL BANK
2265 TSHIRTS & SPORTSWEAR
2267 CALL US CELLULAR
2267 TOGOS EATERY
2269 JEENIS FLOWER MAGIC
2271 WOK N GO
2275 BLOCK H & R LOCAL OFC
2279 XXXX
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS
2287 XXXX
2291 SIMMONS BTYRSTGLRY
2295 APARTMENTS
2295 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
2300 BROADWAY STR
2300 BROADWAY STR ACCNT
2300 BROADWAY STR ACCSRY
2300 BROADWAY STR BEAUTY
2300 BROADWAY STR BRIDAL
2300 BROADWAY STR CHINA
2300 BROADWAY STR CHLDRN
2300 BROADWAY STR FRNTR
2300 BROADWAY STR HANDBG
2300 BROADWAY STR HOSRY
2300 BROADWAY STR HSWRE
2300 BROADWAY STR JRS
2300 BROADWAY STR JWLRY
2300 BROADWAY STR LINENS
2300 BROADWAY STR LNGRIE
2300 BROADWAY STR MENS
2300 BROADWAY STR OTHER
2300 BROADWAY STR SHOES
2300 BROADWAY STR SLVRWR
2300 BROADWAY STR WMNS
2300 BROADWAY STR YOUNG
2300 BUILDING
2300 JUSTTIRES
2301 GOODYEAR TIRE DLRS
2301 HOLLYWOOD TIRE
2330 OLIVE GARDEN ITLN
2332 S A S CMFRTSHOE ST
2332 S A S SHOES
2341 VISTA PAINT& WLLCVRG
2343 XXXX
2345 RESCOM OVERHEAD DRS
2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WSH
2356 XXXX
2364 XXXX
2368 XXXX
2375 BRUNSWICK ORANG BWL
2375 ORANGE BOWL
2378 XXXX
2380 XXXX
2391 XXXX
2393 C & R CLOTHIERS
2393 CALICO CORNERS
2401 MCDONALDS RSTRNT
Part 2 of 2
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GDS
2469 KENTUCKY FRIED CHKN
2475 MISSION FNCL SERVS
2490 ORANGE MALL SHELL
2490 PERRYS ORG SHELL SV
2490 SMOG CHECK STATION
2493 TK SMOG CHECK & AUTO
2495 XXXX
2497 XXXX
2500 JACK IN THE BX REST
2512 COLOR TILE SUPERMRT
2535 WELLS FARGO BK SERV
964
1991 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
1991 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 21
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1436 XXXX
1440 XXXX
1800 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1800 PARK 72 APTS
1801 BECKMAN LUMBER SERV
1801 EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES
1801 GARCIA EDWARD R
1801 MEDI VAN AMBULETTE
1801 PARILLO & ASSOCIATES
1801 PARILLO FRANK & ASCTS
1801 TRIM HLTHCARE SV
1815 COLDWELL BKR ESCROW
1820 ELFSTRUM VIC REV
1820 INDEPNC CHRISTN SCH
1820 ORANGE VILLA BIBLE
1931 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1931 ORNGE TAVLOG MBL PK
2229 XXXX
2342 LEE H
965
1991 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: HAINES
1986 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 22
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
2190 RED EYE
2191 TARGETSTORES
2200 PENNEY PORTATSTDO
2233 WESTRN FDRL SVNGS
2246 XXXX
2249 XXXX
2263 SIMMONS W MATTRESS
2265 XXXX
2267 TOGOS EATERY
2269 XXXX
2271 WOK N GO
2275 BLOCK H & R
2279 ORANGE JEWELRY EXCH
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS
2287 GREATEARTH VITAMIN
2291 LIQUOR EXCHANGE
2295 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
2300 BROADWAY DEPTSTORE
2300 BROADWAY GOODYEAR
2301 GOODYEAR TIRE DLRS
2301 HOLLYWOOD TIRE
2330 XXXX
2332 FAYVA SHOES
2341 VISTA PAINTCENTERS
2343 RODGERS VACUUM CNTR
2343 RODGERS VACUUM CT
2343 ROGERS VACUUM CNTRS
2345 TAMMYS HAIR NAILS
2347 ANGOTTIS TAILOR SHP
2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WSH
2355 SHOE SHINE MASTER
2356 ECCOS PIZZA
2364 XXXX
2368 XXXX
2375 BRUNSWICK ORANG BWL
2375 ORANGE BOWL
2378 XXXX
2380 XXXX
2391 XXXX
2393 C & R CLOTHIERS
2393 CALICO CORNERS
2401 MCDONALDS RESTAURNT
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GDS
2469 KENTUCKY FRIED CHKN
2475 COLDWELL BKR RSDNTL
2490 ORANGE MALL SHLL SV
2490 PERRYS ORG SHELL SV
2490 SMOG CHECK STATION
2493 XXXX
2495 XXXX
2497 XXXX
2500 JACK IN THE BX REST
2512 COLOR TILE SUPERMRT
1436 TRIPPY DALLAS
1440 XXXX
1800 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1800 PARK 72 APTS
1801 MEDI VAN AMBULETTE
1815 ORANGE TREE ESCROW
1815 PRECISION MRTG SERV
1815 PRECISION RECONVYNC
966
1986 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
1986 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 23
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1820 ELFSTRUM VIC REV
1820 INDEPNC CHRSTN SCHL
1820 ORANGE VILLA BIBLE
1931 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1931 ORNGE TRVLDG MBL PK
2229 XXXX
2342 LEE HELEN
2610 DOWLATSHAHI SAEED
2190 RED EYE OM
2191 MC KEE ROBTE INC
2200 XXXX
2233 WESTRN FED SVGS & LN
2246 XXXX
2249 IMPERL BK OFFICE
2263 SIMMONS W MATTRESS
2265 XXXX
2267 TOGOS EATERY
2269 JEAN RYAN
2269 RYAN JEAN
2271 ORANGE BLOSSOM FLWR
2275 HEADS TOGETHER HR
2279 JEWELRY EXCHANGE
2279 ORANGE JEWELRY EXCH
2285 DRY CLEAN EXPRESS
2287 HOUSE OF SECONDS
2291 LIQUOR EXCHANGE
2291 THREE STAR LIQUOR
2295 APARTMENTS
2295 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
2300 BROADWAY DEPTORG
2300 BROADWAY DEPTSTORE
2300 BROADWAY GOODYEAR
2301 GOODYEAR TIRE DLRS
2301 HOLLYWOOD TIRE
2330 SECURITY PAC ACCNTS
2330 SECURITY PAC BX ORG
2330 SECURITY PAC CHECKG
2330 SECURITY PAC LOANS
2330 SECURITY PACFC NATL
2330 SECURITY PCF EXC & CL
2330 SECURITY PCF MSTRCH
2332 FAYVA SHOES
2341 VISTA PAINTCENTERS
2343 SUMMERS R BOOKSLLR
2345 MIDDLE EARTH HRCTTG
2347 ANGOTTIS TAILOR SHP
2355 BEACON BAY AUTO WSH
2356 ECCOS PIZZA
2364 XXXX
2368 XXXX
2375 BRUNSWICK ORNGE BWL
2375 ORANGE BOWL
2378 XXXX
2380 XXXX
2391 XXXX
2393 C & R CLOTHIERS
2393 CALICO CORNERS
2401 MCDONALDS RESTAURNT
2445 BIG FIVE SPORTG GDS
2469 KENTUCKY FRIED CHKN
2475 COLDWELL BKA RSDNTL
2475 COLDWELL BKR RL EST
2475 COLDWELL BKR SALES
2490 ORANGE MALL SHLL SV
2490 PERRYS ORG SHELL SV
2493 XXXX
2495 XXXX
2497 XXXX
2500 JACK IN THE BOX
2512 COLOR TILE SPRMARTS
2535 GREATAM FRSTSVNGS
2535 LAGUNA FEDERAL
967
1981 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
1981 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: HAINES
Page: 24
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1440 XXXX
1800 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1800 PARK 72
1800 PARK 72 APTS
1800 PARK 72 SALES OFC
1801 GOODMAN SAMUEL
1801 ORANGE KNOLL REALTY
16292 XXXX
16322 XXXX
16342 CAMPBELL WILLIAM C
1820 ELFSTRUM VIC REV
1820 INDEPNDNC CHRSTN SC
1820 ORANGE VILLA BIBLE
1931 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1931 ORNGE TRVLDG MBL PK
2229 GRIMM H E
2342 LEE HELEN
968
1981 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: HAINES
1975 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 25
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
2190 RED EYE OM
2200 XXXX
2233 WESTERN FED SVGS & LN
2249 IMPERIAL BK CUSTOMR
2249 IMPERIAL BK INFRMTN
2249 IMPERIAL BK INS PRM
2249 IMPERIAL BK NOTE DP
2249 IMPERIAL BK NW ACCT
2263 SIMMONS W MATTRESS
2265 XXXX
2267 UNIV STEREO
2271 ORANGE BLOSSOM FLWR
2275 HEADS TOGETHER HR
2279 BENEFICIAL FIN CO
2279 BENEFICIAL FNC CAL
2279 BENEFICIAL INCM TX
2287 HOUSE OF SECONDS
2291 VILLAGE PARK LIQUOR
2295 APARTMENTS
2295 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
2300 BROADWAY DEPTORG
2300 BROADWAY DEPTSTRS
2301 HOLLYWOOD TIRE
2330 SECURITY PAC BK ORG
2330 SECURITY PCF AT& OTH
2330 SECURITY PCF CMMRCL
2330 SECURITY PCF ESCROW
2330 SECURITY PCF EXC & CL
2330 SECURITY PCF MSTRCH
2330 SECURITY PCF OTHER
2330 SECURITY PCF RL EST
2330 SECURITY PCF SF DPT
2332 FAYYA SHOE STORE
2341 VISTA PAINTCORP
2343 CAL PAC REALTORS
2343 JONES PATREALTORS
2343 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
2345 MIDDLE EARTH HRCTTG
2347 ANGOTTIS TAILOR SHP
2355 ORANGE CAR WASH
2356 ECCOS PIZZA
2368 XXXX
2375 BRUNSWICK ORG BOWL
2375 ORANGE BOWL
2380 XXXX
2393 RIVIERA CONVERTBLS
2393 RIVIERA SOFA BED
2401 MCDONALDS RESTORG
2445 BIG FIVE SPORTG GDS
2469 KENTUCKY FRD CHCKN
2475 OLSON FORESTORANGE
2490 ORANGE MALL SHELL
2490 PERRYS ORG SHELL SV
2493 D & L PRFRMNC DYN TN
2495 XXXX
2497 XXXX
2500 CHEVRON STN ORANGE
2500 ORANGE MALL CHEVRON
2500 RYDER TRK RNTL ORG
2512 COLOR TILE SPRMARTS
2535 LAGUNA FED SVNGS & LN
1128 SHUMWAY RUSSELL
1250 STPAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH & SCHOOL
1800 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1815 MIRANDA EDW D
969
1975 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1975 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 26
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1746 WILD WEDNESDAY
1820 ORANGE - VILLA BIBLE CHURCH
1931 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1931 ORANGE TRAVELODGE MOBILE HOME PARK
1931 SAHR ELTON B
2229 GRIMM H E
2342 LEE HELEN
2190 RED EYE
2200 GALLEON GIFTS & CANDLES
2200 KINNEY SHOES
2200 MURATA PEARL CO
2200 SEE'S CANDY SHOPS INC
2200 WETHERBY KAYSER SHOES
2233 WESTERN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION
2249 IMPERIAL BANK
2263 SIMMONS W MATTRESS FACTORY INC
2265 DIXIE HI - FI
2271 ORANGE BLOSSOM FLOWER & GIFTSHOP
2275 HEADS TOGETHER HAIR DESIGN
2279 BENEFICIAL FINANCE CO OF ORANGE
2287 HOUSE OF SECONDS
2291 VILLA PARK LIQUORS & GOURMET
2295 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
2300 BROADWAY DEPARTMENTSTORES
2301 HOLLYWOOD TIRE OF ORANGE
2330 SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK
2340 RADIO SHACK A TANDY CORPORATION COMPANY
2341 VISTA PAINTCORPORATION
2343 CAL PACIFIC REALTORS
2345 MIDDLE EARTH HAIRCUTTING
2347 ANGOTTI'S TAILOR SHOP
2355 ORANGE CAR WASH
2375 BRUNSWICK ORANGE BOWL
2393 RIVIERA SOFA BED CO
2401 MC DONALD'S RESTAURANTS
2445 BIG 5 SPORTING GOODS
2469 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
2490 AL WOOD'S SHELL SERVICE
2500 HUNT'S CHEVRON SERVICE
2512 COLOR TILE SUPERMARTS
2550 VILLA FORD
970
1970 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1970 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 27
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1250 STPAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH OF OLIVE
1800 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1801 RUNNELLS ELDON R
1815 PIERCE WM
1746 PEAKS IN PRINTING
1820 ORANGE - VILLA BIBLE CHURCH
1931 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1931 ORANGE TRAVELODGE MOBILE HOME PARK
2121 ELDERS JOHN H
2131 FEATHERCRESTFARMS
2229 GRIMM H E
2342 TAFOYA S R
971
1970 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1964 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 28
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
2125 -26 HUGHES BESSIE I MRS
2233 CAPITOL CLUB
2233 WESTERN FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN
2267 PACIFIC SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
2271 ORANGE BLOSSOM FLOWER & GIFTSHOP
2275 ARTENOS OF ATHENS HAIR STYLES
2279 BENEFICIAL FINANCE CO OF ORANGE
2285 WALKER & LEE
2287 MILLAR FRED B
2287 SHAHAN'S BABY SITTING AGCY
2291 VILLA PARK LIQUORS & GOURMET
2295 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
2301 SAFEWAY TIRE CO
2469 COLONEL SANDERS KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
2490 AL WOOD'S SHELL SERVICE
2495 PHIL'S GULF SERVICE
2500 HUNT'S CHEVRON SERVICE
2550 VILLA FORD
1103 SYMMES CARL E
1128 SHUMWAY RUSSELL
1624 ATER L E
1800 BUILDING
1800 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1815 LEVASSEUR G
972
1964 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1964 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 29
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1820 ORG - VILLA BIBLE CHU
1931 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
1931 ORANGE MOBILE PARK
1931 TRAILER PARK
1931 WOOLERY W W - PAINTING (12)
2342 SMITH R L
17301 HEIN D F
17311 FEATHERCRESTFARMS
17321 GRIMM H E
2125 MULTI TENANTRESIDENTIAL
2263 BUSTERS RESTAURANT
2267 SUZZETTES APPAREL
2271 7 SEAS - GIFTSHOP
2275 GWENS CARROUSEL - BTY
2283 COPELAN H L - MD
2285 HILLVIEW REALTY
2287 BANQUETING - CAESER
2291 VILLA PARK LIQUOR
2340 TUSTIN AV PLTRY RNCH
2500 DUCKWORTH L CHEVRON
2593 NEVINS C LOUIS
2945 WILSHIRE SERV STNS
973
1958 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1958 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 30
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
974
1958 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1955 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 31
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com
1596 KLANER F H
1650 WILLIAMS GARAGE

STREETNOTLISTED
975
1955 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
1955 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: PACIFIC TELEPHONE
Page: 32
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED RANGE NOTLISTED
976
1951 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE:LUSKEYS
1951 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE:LUSKEYS
Page: 33
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
977
1951 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE:LUSKEYS
1945 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
Page: 34
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

RANGE NOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
978
1945 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1945 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
Page: 35
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
979
1940 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1940 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
Page: 36
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
980
1940 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1937 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
Page: 37
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
981
1937 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1937 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
Page: 38
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
982
1934 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1934 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
Page: 39
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
983
1934 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1930 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
Page: 40
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
984
1930 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
1930 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE: WESTERN DIRECTORY CO
Page: 41
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
985
1926 E HEIM AVE
SOURCE:FLAGGS
1926 E MEATS AVE
SOURCE:FLAGGS
Page: 42
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED STREETNOTLISTED
986
1926 N TUSTIN ST
SOURCE:FLAGGS
Page: 43
ReportID: 24012400327 - 01/31/2024
www.erisinfo.com

STREETNOTLISTED
987
Appendix G - Regulatory
Database Report
988
Project Property: 2375 N Tustin St
2375 N Tustin St
Orange CA 92865
Project No: 224-0059
Report Type: Database Report
Order No: 24012400327
Requested by: EDI Consultants, Inc.

Date Completed: January 26, 2024
989
2 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 h-Table of Contents
Notice: IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY
Reliance on information in Report: This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records.

License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier.

The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re-sold.

Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service.

No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report.

Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report (s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS.

Table of Contents
Table of Contents...........................................................................................2 Executive Summary........................................................................................3 Executive Summary: Report Summary.......................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property...................................................................................9 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties......................................................................11 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source.......................................................................................................22 Map...............................................................................................................38 Aerial.............................................................................................................41 Topographic Map..........................................................................................42 Detail Report.................................................................................................43 Unplottable Summary.................................................................................321 Unplottable Report......................................................................................322 Appendix: Database Descriptions...............................................................325 Definitions...................................................................................................344 990
3 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 h-Executive Summary
Property Information:

Project Property: 2375 N Tustin St
2375 N Tustin St Orange CA 92865
Project No: 224-0059
Coordinates:

Latitude: 33.82789895
Longitude: -117.83460187
UTM Northing: 3,743,387.17
UTM Easting: 422,770.19
UTM Zone: UTM Zone 11S
Elevation: 265 FT
Order Information:

Order No: 24012400327
Date Requested: January 24, 2024
Requested by: EDI Consultants, Inc.

Report Type: Database Report
Historicals/Products:

Aerial Photographs Historical Aerials (with Project Boundaries) City Directory Search Smart CD Search
ERIS Xplorer ERIS Xplorer
Excel Add-On Excel Add-On
Fire Insurance Maps US Fire Insurance Maps
Permit Timeline Report Permit Timeline Report
Physical Setting Report (PSR) Physical Setting Report (PSR) Topographic Map Topographic Maps
Executive Summary
991
4 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 h-Executive Summary: Report Summary
Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
Standard Environmental Records
Federal
rr-NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-PROPOSED NPL-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-DELETED NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-SEMS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-SEMS ARCHIVE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-ODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CERCLIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-IODI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CERCLIS NFRAP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CERCLIS LIENS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-RCRA CORRACTS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-RCRA TSD-aa Y 0.5 0 1 0 3 - 4

rr-RCRA LQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 3 - - 3

rr-RCRA SQG-aa Y 0.25 0 2 3 - - 5

rr-RCRA VSQG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-RCRA NON GEN-aa Y 0.25 1 18 27 - - 46

rr-RCRA CONTROLS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-FED ENG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-FED INST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-LUCIS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-NPL IC-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-ERNS 1982 TO 1986-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-ERNS 1987 TO 1989-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-ERNS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-FED BROWNFIELDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-FEMA UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-FRP-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

NPL

PROPOSED NPL

DELETED NPL
SEMS

SEMS ARCHIVE
ODI

CERCLIS
IODI

CERCLIS NFRAP

CERCLIS LIENS

RCRA CORRACTS

RCRA TSD

RCRA LQG

RCRA SQG

RCRA VSQG

RCRA NON GEN

RCRA CONTROLS

FED ENG

FED INST
LUCIS
NPL IC
ERNS 1982 TO 1986
ERNS 1987 TO 1989
ERNS

FED BROWNFIELDS

FEMA UST
FRP
Executive Summary: Report Summary
992
5 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-DELISTED FRP-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-HIST GAS STATIONS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-REFN-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-BULK TERMINAL-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-SEMS LIEN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-SUPERFUND ROD-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-DOE FUSRAP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

State
rr-RESPONSE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-ENVIROSTOR-aa Y 1 0 0 0 1 3 4

rr-DELISTED ENVS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-SWF/LF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-SWRCB SWF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-WMUD-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1

rr-HWP-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-SWAT-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-C&D DEBRIS RECY-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1

rr-RECYCLING-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PROCESSORS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CONTAINER RECY-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-LDS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-LUST-aa Y 0.5 1 3 0 6 - 10

rr-DELISTED LST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-UST-aa Y 0.25 0 2 0 - - 2

rr-UST CLOSURE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1

rr-HHSS-aa Y 0.25 1 3 1 - - 5

rr-UST SWEEPS-aa Y 0.25 1 3 0 - - 4

rr-AST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-AST SWRCB-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-TANK OIL GAS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-DELISTED TNK-aa Y 0.25 1 0 0 - - 1

rr-CERS TANK-aa Y 0.25 0 2 0 - - 2

rr-DELISTED CTNK-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-HIST TANK-aa Y 0.25 1 3 1 - - 5

DELISTED FRP

HIST GAS STATIONS
REFN

BULK TERMINAL

SEMS LIEN

SUPERFUND ROD

DOE FUSRAP

RESPONSE

ENVIROSTOR

DELISTED ENVS
SWF/LF

SWRCB SWF
WMUD
HWP
SWAT

C&D DEBRIS RECY

RECYCLING

PROCESSORS

CONTAINER RECY
LDS
LUST

DELISTED LST
UST

UST CLOSURE
HHSS

UST SWEEPS
AST

AST SWRCB

TANK OIL GAS

DELISTED TNK

CERS TANK

DELISTED CTNK

HIST TANK
993
6 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-LUR-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CALSITES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HLUR-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-DEED-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-VCP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CLEANUP SITES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 3 - 3

rr-DELISTED CLEANUP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-DELISTED COUNTY-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

Tribal
rr-INDIAN LUST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-INDIAN UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-DELISTED INDIAN LST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-DELISTED INDIAN UST-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

County
rr-ICP ORANGE-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-LOP ORANGE-aa Y 0.5 0 2 0 3 - 5

rr-NPUT ORANGE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-UST ORANGE-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-AST ORANGE-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-UST CLP ANAHEIM-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-UST ANAHEIM-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-AST ANAHEIM-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

Additional Environmental Records
Federal
rr-PFAS GHG-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-FINDS/FRS-aa Y PO 2 2 - - - 4

rr-TRIS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-PFAS NPL-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS FED SITES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS SSEHRI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-ERNS PFAS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS NPDES-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS TRI-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS WATER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

LUR

CALSITES
HLUR
DEED
VCP

CLEANUP SITES

DELISTED CLEANUP

DELISTED COUNTY

INDIAN LUST

INDIAN UST

DELISTED INDIAN LST

DELISTED INDIAN UST

ICP ORANGE

LOP ORANGE

NPUT ORANGE

UST ORANGE

AST ORANGE

UST CLP ANAHEIM

UST ANAHEIM

AST ANAHEIM

PFAS GHG

FINDS/FRS
TRIS

PFAS NPL

PFAS FED SITES

PFAS SSEHRI

ERNS PFAS

PFAS NPDES

PFAS TRI

PFAS WATER
994
7 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-PFAS TSCA-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS E-MANIFEST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS IND-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HMIRS-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-NCDL-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-HIST TSCA-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-FTTS ADMIN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-FTTS INSP-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-PRP-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-SCRD DRYCLEANER-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-ICIS-aa Y PO 0 1 - - - 1

rr-FED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 1 0 - - 1

rr-DELISTED FED DRY-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-FUDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-FUDS MRS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-FORMER NIKE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-PIPELINE INCIDENT-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-MLTS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-HIST MLTS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-MINES-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-SMCRA-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-MRDS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 1 1

rr-LM SITES-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-ALT FUELS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-CONSENT DECREES-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-AFS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-SSTS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-PCBT-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PCB-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

State
rr-PFAS SAMPLING-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 1 0 - - 1

rr-DELISTED DRYCLEANERS-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-DRYC GRANT-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

PFAS TSCA

PFAS E-MANIFEST

PFAS IND
HMIRS
NCDL
TSCA

HIST TSCA

FTTS ADMIN

FTTS INSP
PRP

SCRD DRYCLEANER
ICIS

FED DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED FED DRY
FUDS

FUDS MRS

FORMER NIKE

PIPELINE INCIDENT
MLTS

HIST MLTS
MINES
SMCRA
MRDS

LM SITES

ALT FUELS

CONSENT DECREES
AFS
SSTS
PCBT
PCB

PFAS SAMPLING

DRYCLEANERS

DELISTED DRYCLEANERS

DRYC GRANT
995
8 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 Database Searched Search
Radius
Project
Property
Within

0.12mi

0.125mi
to 0.25mi

0.25mi to

0.50mi

0.50mi to

1.00mi
Total
rr-PFAS GT CLEANUPS-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS GW-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-PFAS INVEST-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HWSS CLEANUP-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-TOXIC PITS-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-DTSC HWF-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-INSP COMP ENF-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-SCH-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-CHMIRS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-HIST CHMIRS-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-HAZNET-aa Y PO 1 2 - - - 3

rr-HAZ GEN-aa Y PO 5 1 - - - 6

rr-HAZ TSD-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-HIST MANIFEST-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-HW TRANSPORT-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-WASTE TIRE-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-MEDICAL WASTE-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-HIST CORTESE-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CDO/CAO-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-CERS HAZ-aa Y 0.125 1 10 - - - 11

rr-DELISTED HAZ-aa Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0

rr-GEOTRACKER-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

rr-MINE-aa Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

rr-LIEN-aa Y PO 0 - - - - 0

rr-WASTE DISCHG-aa Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0

rr-EMISSIONS-aa Y 0.25 0 5 5 - - 10

rr-CDL-aa Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0

Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State.

County
rr-HW ORANGE-aa Y 0.125 1 6 - - - 7

Total: 16 68 40 19 4 147
* PO – Property Only
* 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles.

PFAS GT CLEANUPS

PFAS GW

PFAS INVEST

HWSS CLEANUP

TOXIC PITS

DTSC HWF

INSP COMP ENF
SCH
CHMIRS

HIST CHMIRS
HAZNET

HAZ GEN

HAZ TSD

HIST MANIFEST

HW TRANSPORT

WASTE TIRE

MEDICAL WASTE

HIST CORTESE

CDO/CAO

CERS HAZ

DELISTED HAZ

GEOTRACKER
MINE
LIEN

WASTE DISCHG

EMISSIONS
CDL

HW ORANGE
996
9 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map
Key
DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev Diff
(ft)
Page
Number
m1d dd-DELISTED TNK-820065208-aa BAY AUTO WASH 2355 N TUSTIN AVE Orange CA 92865
WSW 0.00 / 0.00 -6 p1p-43-820065208-x1x
m1d dd-LUST-820171750-aa BEACON BAY AUTO WASH
#01
2355 NORTH TUSTIN
ORANGE CA 92867
WSW 0.00 / 0.00 -6 p1p-43-820171750-x1x
Global ID | Status Date | Status: T0605902085 | 2/11/2014 | COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
m1d dd-HHSS-822989408-aa ORANGE AUTO WASH 2355 NORTH TUSTIN STREET
ORANGE CA 92667
WSW 0.00 / 0.00 -6 p1p-59-822989408-x1x
m1d dd-HAZNET-826149427-aa 96BEACON BAY

ENTERPRISES INC
2355 NO TUSTIN
ORANGE CA 926670000
WSW 0.00 / 0.00 -6 p1p-59-826149427-x1x
m1d dd-FINDS/FRS-840188007-aa BEACON BAY AUTO WASH
#01
2355 NORTH TUSTIN
ORANGE CA 92867
WSW 0.00 / 0.00 -6 p1p-60-840188007-x1x
Registry ID: 110065617648
m1d dd-HIST TANK-865066603-aa ORANGE AUTO WASH 2355 NORTH TUSTIN STREET

ORANGE CA
WSW 0.00 / 0.00 -6 p1p-60-865066603-x1x
m1d dd-UST SWEEPS-888178241-aa ORANGE AUTO WASH 2355 N TUSTIN

ORANGE CA
WSW 0.00 / 0.00 -6 p1p-61-888178241-x1x
C C | Status: A30-030-43908 | ACTIVE
Tank ID: 000002, 000006, 000007, 000003, 000009, 000004, 000001, 000005, 000008 m1d dd-HAZ GEN-900539819-aa BEACON BAY

ENTERPRISES INC
2355 NO TUSTIN
ORANGE CA 926670000
WSW 0.00 / 0.00 -6 p1p-62-900539819-x1x
m2d dd-CERS HAZ-864897336-aa Best Buy #1198 2375 N TUSTIN ST ORANGE CA 92865
W 0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-62-864897336-x1x
m2d dd-RCRA NON GEN-873989560-aa BEST BUY STORE #1198 2375 N TUSTIN ST ORANGE CA 92865
W 0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-65-873989560-x1x
EPA Handler ID: CAL000425997
m2d dd-FINDS/FRS-874846385-aa BEST BUY STORE #1198 2375 N TUSTIN ST ORANGE CA 92865
W 0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-66-874846385-x1x
Registry ID: 110070426421
m2d dd-HW ORANGE-879752788-aa Best Buy #1198 2375 N Tustin St Orange, Ca 92865-3705
Orange CA 92865-3705
W 0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-66-879752788-x1x
m2d dd-HAZ GEN-900007388-aa BEST BUY STORE #1198 2375 N TUSTIN ST ORANGE CA 92865
W 0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-66-900007388-x1x
43 43
59 59
60 60
61 62
62 65
66 66
66 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
2 2
2 2

DELISTED
TNK
LUST
HHSS
HAZNET

FINDS/FRS
HIST
TANK
UST
SWEEPS
HAZ
GEN
CERS
HAZ
RCRA

NON GEN

FINDS/FRS
HW
ORANGE
HAZ
GEN
Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 997
10 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 Map
Key
DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev Diff
(ft)
Page
Number
m2d dd-HAZ GEN-900123603-aa BEST BUY STORE #1198 2375 N TUSTIN ST ORANGE CA 928653705
W 0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-67-900123603-x1x
m2d dd-HAZ GEN-900240158-aa BEST BUY CO STORE 1198 2375 N TUSTIN ST ORANGE CA 92865
W 0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-67-900240158-x1x
m2d dd-HAZ GEN-900539500-aa BEST BUY STORE 1198 2375 N TUSTIN ST ORANGE CA 928653705
W 0.00 / 0.00 -7 p1p-67-900539500-x1x
67 67
67 2
2 2
HAZ
GEN
HAZ
GEN
HAZ
GEN
998
11 erisinfo.com | Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 24012400327 h-Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map
Key
DB Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance
(mi/ft)
Elev Diff
(ft)
Page
Number
m3d dd-HAZNET-858347102-aa ORANGE VILLAGE

DENTISTRY DENTAL
GROUP
2393 N TUSTIN ST STE A
ORANGE CA 92865
WNW 0.01 / 65.78 -6 p1p-67-858347102-x1x
m3d dd-RCRA NON GEN-873960821-aa ORANGE VILLAGE

DENTISTRY DENTAL
GROUP
2393 N TUSTIN ST STE A
ORANGE CA 92865
WNW 0.01 / 65.78 -6 p1p-67-873960821-x1x
EPA Handler ID: CAL000409870
m3d dd-FINDS/FRS-874907082-aa ORANGE VILLAGE

DENTISTRY DENTAL
GROUP
2393 N TUSTIN ST STE A
ORANGE CA 92865
WNW 0.01 / 65.78 -6 p1p-68-874907082-x1x
Registry ID: 110070423727
m4d dd-HAZNET-826497618-aa AMC THEATRE 2320 N TUSTIN
ORANGE CA 928650000
W 0.01 / 71.70 -6 p1p-69-826497618-x1x
m5d dd-FINDS/FRS-816584934-aa VISTA PAINT
CORPORATION #4
2341 N TUSTIN ST
ORANGE CA 92865
SW 0.02 / 80.41 -7 p1p-69-816584934-x1x
Registry ID: 110010595560
m5d dd-HHSS-822943075-aa VISTA PAINT