Agenda packet — Oroville City Council, April 21, 2026 (part 2 of 3)

339
Item 15.
4/16/2026
Attachment A
Section Notes Quantity Unit Unit Cost Item Total
Revision No:

Section Description
United Building Contractors, Inc Job No.

ROM Based off of SD drawings received from design team on 2/20/26 Date:

City of Oroville Corporate Yard - Building B Maintenance Building Office, Restroom Renovations & Sitework: Option 1 - With Site Work and All Add Alt Pricing Items Included per below (Alt #4 Evap Cooling & Heating option included w/ Option #2 Structural Upgrades deduct below) Assumes new toilet accessories at restrooms 126, 127 & 128; Includes paper towels dispensers & receptacles, soap disp., toilet paper holders, seat cover dispensers, mirrors and grab bars 1 ls $6,395.00 $6,395.00 1 ls $2,365.00 $2,365.00
Tackboards - Excluded Excluded - not shown in plans 1 ls $0.00 $0.00 Markerboard w/ Tray - Excluded Excluded - not shown in plans 1 ls $0.00 $0.00 $13,410.00
Excluded - not shown in plans 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Excluded - not shown in plans 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
n/a 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Assumes new fire sprinklers at Rooms 124, 125, 126, and 127; Excludes fire sprinklers at the existing Maintenance Shop portion and rooms 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, & 133 1 ls $16,146.50 $16,146.50
$16,146.50
Increased: Includes new water closets, urinals, lavatories, water heater, expansion tank, mop sink, floor drain, 2 shower valves, drywells; Excludes interior gas piping to accommodate the new radiant heaters, water heater, and HVAC package unit. See add alt #4 1 ls $57,784.00 $57,784.00 Includes underslab trenching and backfilling for installing the new building drain lines to accommodate the new fixtures 1 ls $7,500.00 $7,500.00 Excluded - see add alt #4 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
Excluded - see add alt #4 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$65,284.00
Assumes a new HVAC system including at the Restroom & Office areas only including a rooftop package unit with ductwork, refrigernat lines and diffusers; Excludes the shop HVAC upgrades. See add alt items below. 1 ls $63,880.00 $63,880.00 Includes hard wired thermostats per above, but excludes integration of controls into an existing BMS or BACNET system 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$63,880.00
1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Includes electrical, fire alarm, data / low voltage at Rooms 124, 125, 126, and 127 AND new lights at Storage Rooms 128 - 133 only; Excludes the warehouse shop portion of the buildin and the power service upgrades including a new 400A sub panel, 500A panel, 100KVA 480v - 240v tranformer, and a 200A panel. See add alt items below. 1 ls $93,000.00 $93,000.00
Excludes trenching between building B and the existing MSB for new feeder lines.

See add alt #1 below. 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
Excluded - See add alt items #8 for price 1 ls $0.00 $0.00 Excluded - not shown in plans 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
Excluded - no solar shown in plans 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$93,000.00
Included above in electrical 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
Included above in electrical 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Survey & Construction Staking Survey utilities, new concrete walkway, and interior spread footings 1 ls $6,500.00 $6,500.00 1 ls $2,500.00 $2,500.00
Site Demo - Hard Demo Includes demo for new concrete sidewalk at building B only 1 ls $3,247.50 $3,247.50 Earthwork & Grading Includes rough grading as required for new concrete sidewalk at building B 1 ls $3,139.25 $3,139.25 Includes rough grading as required for new concrete sidewalk at building B 1 ls $4,438.25 $4,438.25 Includes a 2" domestic water line service from the existing BUILDING A to building B per the Plumbing narrative; EXCLUDES routing domestic watter serivce to backflow and fire water lines, sewer lines, and RWL / storm drain lines; Assumes existing sewer system is large enough to accommodate the bathroom upgrades 1 ls $10,870.00 $10,870.00
1 ls $9,500.00 $9,500.00
Assumes AC Patchback at South of building A parking lot to "adjust the flow line" and patching at trenching locations 1 ls $3,395.00 $3,395.00 Toilet Accessories
Fire Extinguishers & Cabinets
Division 10 Totals
Division 11 - Equipment
n/a
Division 13 Totals
Division 21 - Fire Suppression
Fire Sprinklers
Division 21 Totals
Division 22- Plumbing
Plumbing
Division 11 Totals
Division 12 - Furnishings
Window Shades
Division 12 Totals
Division 13 - Special Construction
HVAC Controls
Division 23 Totals
Division 24-Not Used
N/A
Division 24 Totals
Division 25 - Not Used
Trenching and Backfilling - Underslab
Site Gas - Excluded
Site Gas - Trench & Backfilling - Excluded
Division 22 Totals
Division 23 Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC)

HVAC & TAB
Light Poles and Bases - Excluded
Solar System - Excluded
Division 26 Totals
Division 27 Communications
Data
Division 27 Totals
N/A
Division 25 Totals
Division 26 Electrical
Electrical - Turn Key (data, AV, and FA) - New Addition Site Trenching and Backfilling (Site) - Excluded
Site Electrical / Power to Access Gates - Excluded
Division 32-33 Earthwork and Exterior Improvements
SWPP & BMPs
Finish Grade / Baserock
Site Utilities - Domestic Water Only (From Building A Service) Offhaul
Asphalt Paving
Division 28 Electrical Safety and Security
Fire Alarm & Assistive Listening System
Division 28 Totals
Division 29-31 Not Used
Division 29-30 Totals

Page 3 of 6 ends

340
Item 15.
4/16/2026
Attachment A
Section Notes Quantity Unit Unit Cost Item Total
Revision No:

Section Description
United Building Contractors, Inc Job No.

ROM Based off of SD drawings received from design team on 2/20/26 Date:

11.50% $105,978.60
TOTAL BASE BID #2 PRICE WITH MARKUPS $1,027,531.60
Price assumes domestic water service and be connected to the existing Building A and NOT FROM THE STREET Survey & Construction Staking
Survey utilities, new concrete walkway, and interior spread footings; Included in Base bid #2 price 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
Additional SWPP & BMPs due to larger sitework area per Sitework Upgrades 1 ls $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Site Demo - Hard Demo
Includes demo of existing AC as required to trench for water service to street; Excludes demo for adjusting flow line near building A 1 ls $7,500.00 $7,500.00 Earthwork & Grading Excludes rough grading as required to adjust flow line near building A 1 ls $0.00 $0.00 Excludes rough grading as required to only adjust flow line near building A 1 ls $0.00 $0.00 Includes a 2" domestic water line service from the existing backflow to building B per the Plumbing narrative; EXCLUDES fire water lines, sewer lines, and RWL / storm drain lines; Assumes existing sewer system is large enough to accommodate the bathroom upgrades 1 ls $35,000.00 $35,000.00 Included in base bid #2 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
Assumes AC Patchback at trenching locations; Excludes asphalt paving at South of building A parking lot to "adjust the flow line" and patching 1 ls $6,794.18 $6,794.18 Assumes to seal coat the entire asphalt parking lott areas at the North, East and South parking lots of Building A and also the North and East parking lott areas of building B as shown by plans; Slurry seal coat type 2 not included, see add alt #9 1 ls $14,114.00 $14,114.00 Assumes to restore the existing adjacent landscape areas back to their original condition 1 ls $12,199.00 $12,199.00
Excluded - See add alt items #8 for price 1 ls $0.00 $0.00 Excludes all fencing & gates, see add alt #7 below for motor access gate 1 ls $0.00 $0.00 $81,607.18

11.50% $9,384.83
Base Bid #3 Construction Cost Total $90,992.00
TOTAL BASE BID #2 AND #3 PRICE WITH MARKUPS $1,118,523.60 Includes the power service upgrades including a new 400A sub panel, 500A panel, 100KVA 480v - 240v tranformer, and a 200A panel. 1 ls $104,813.00 $104,813.00 Includes trenching between building B and the existing MSB for new feeder lines 1 ls $10,725.00 $10,725.00 Construction Cost Total $115,538.00

11.5% $13,286.87
$128,824.87
Demo two (2) exterior wall openings for new roll up doors 1 ls $7,700.00 $7,700.00 New compression strut upgrades at roll up doors 1 ls $16,000.00 $16,000.00 Cold formed metal framing at infill door locations 1 ls $8,030.00 $8,030.00 Includes exterior wall panel patchback to match the building 1 ls $22,880.00 $22,880.00 Includes insulation at infill areas 1 ls $1,320.00 $1,320.00 Includes touch up paint at exposed plywood infill area 1 ls $5,625.00 $5,625.00 Includes two (2) new 20' x 16" overhead roll up doors 1 ls $79,916.00 $79,916.00 Incldues power for the new overhead roll up doors 1 ls $20,000.00 $20,000.00 Please input percentage to calculate item cost:

Profit
Clarifications
This price only includes work at Building B and assumes to provide a new 2" water service from the existing backflow onsite (location TBD); This price includes New finishes at building B Rooms 124, 125, 126, and 127 AND new lights at Storage Rooms 128 - 133 only; Assumes all new electrical at shop area and storage rooms to be exposed / surface mounted; Assumes new infill areas to be wood framed Slurry Seal @ AC Parking Lott - Excluded
Landscape & Irrigation Restoration
Site Striping & Signage - Excluded
Chainlink Fencing & Gates - Excluded
Division 32-33 Totals
SWPP & BMPs
Finish Grade / Baserock
Site Utilities - Domestic Water Only
Offhaul
Asphalt Paving
Slurry Seal @ AC Parking Lott
Exclusions
Price excludes any work at building A, abatment of hazardous materials, polished concrete, overhead roll up doors, fueling station work, vehicle exhaust system upgrades, exterior siding replacement, exterior roof replacement, exterior wall insulation replacement, fencing, and frontage improvements, structural steel, spread footings and concrete patchback at shop area or new and / or old roll up door locations, interior windows, framed), sound board / acoustical drywall, fire caulking, fire retardant coatings / sprays, decorative ceilings, aluminum signage or logo signs, glulam beams Base Bid #3 - Sitework Upgrades Additive Price (Excludes Flow Line Adjustments) Base Bid #3 - Sitework Upgrades
Summary of Additive Alternate Pricing:

Add Alt #1 - Electrical Service Upgrades & Panel Replacement at Building B Maintenance Shop Electrical
Site Trenching and Backfilling (Site)
interior windows, framed), sound board / acoustical drywall, fire caulking, fire retardant coatings / sprays, decorative ceilings, aluminum signage or logo signs, glulam beams Landscape & Irrigation Restoration
Site Striping & Signage - Excluded
Chainlink Fencing & Gates - Excluded
Base Bid #3 Construction Cost Total
Please input percentage to calculate item cost:

Profit
Wall Panels
Insulation
Paint
Overhead Roll Up Doors
Electrical
GC Mark Up
Add Alt #1 Totals
Add Alt #2 - Overhead Roll Up Door Replacement & Infill at Building B Maintenance Shop Area Soft Demo
Structural Steel
Cold Formed Studs & Framing
This price only includes work at Building B and assumes to provide a new 2" water service from the existing backflow onsite (location TBD); This price includes New finishes at building B Rooms 124, 125, 126, and 127 AND new lights at Storage Rooms 128 - 133 only; Assumes all new electrical at shop area and storage rooms to be exposed / surface mounted; Assumes new infill areas to be wood framed Exclusions
Price excludes any work at building A, abatment of hazardous materials, polished concrete, overhead roll up doors, fueling station work, vehicle exhaust system upgrades, exterior siding replacement, exterior roof replacement, exterior wall insulation replacement, fencing, and frontage improvements, structural steel, spread footings and concrete patchback at shop area or new and / or old roll up door locations,

Page 4 of 6 ends

341
Item 15.
4/16/2026
Attachment A
Section Notes Quantity Unit Unit Cost Item Total
Revision No:

Section Description
United Building Contractors, Inc Job No.

ROM Based off of SD drawings received from design team on 2/20/26 Date:

11.5% $18,569.17
$180,040.17
Housekeeping Pads 1 ls $9,650.00 $9,650.00
Grading Housekeeping Pad 1 ls $3,740.00 $3,740.00
Excludes drywall patch at Walls & Ceiling 1 ls $0.00 $0.00 Excluded 1 ls $0.00 $0.00
Condensate and gas lines to serve new units 1 ls $51,216.00 $51,216.00 Revised: Assumes 4 new swamp coolers, 4 radiant heaters, and 2 BAF 12' diameter fans to serve the maintenance shop area; Excludes any overhead ductwork inside the building; Assumes penetrating and terminating ductwork at exterior walls to provide cooling 1 ls $206,071.00 $206,071.00 Electrical for added HVAC units 1 ls $112,153.00 $112,153.00 Includes new gas lines at the site from the existing gas meter to the building 1 ls $6,850.00 $6,850.00 Includes trench and backfillling for the new gas lines at the site from the existing gas meter to the building 1 ls $12,535.00 $12,535.00
1 ls $0.00 $0.00
Construction Cost Total $402,215.00

11.5% $46,254.73
$448,469.73
Incldues conduits and conductors to provide power to 3 vehicle lift stations and 2 tire machine locations at the maintenance shop area; Assumes to pull power from panel L2 at the Utility 134 room and run the power overhead to a J box at each station location; Excludes concrete demo and patchback for running underslab; Excludes painting conduits 1 ls $22,377.58 $22,377.58
Construction Cost Total $22,377.58

11.5% $2,573.42
$24,951.00
TOTAL WITH BASE BIDS #2 & #3 AND ADD ALTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 7 COMBINED $1,900,809.36 DEDUCT: If Structural Upgrades at Mezzanine Are per Option #2 Only -$152,824.00 TOTAL WITH BASE BIDS #2 & #3 AND ADD ALTS 1, 2, 4, & 9 COMBINED & DEDUCT ACCEPTED $1,747,985 Add Alt #9 - Power to Vehicle Lift & Tire Machines at Shop Area Electrical
GC Mark Up
Add Alt #9 Totals
GC Mark Up
Add Alt #4 - New HVAC Upgrades at Building B Maintenance Shop Area Concrete
Earthwork & Grading
Drywall Patch - Excluded
Paint - Excluded
Add Alt #2 Totals
Plumbing
HVAC
Electrical
Site Gas
Site Gas - Trench & Backfilling
GC Mark Up
Add Alt #4 Totals

Page 5 of 6 ends

342
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 1
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

CITY OF OROVILLE
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (“RFP”)

FOR DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY
FOR
CORPORATION YARD PROJECT – MULTI-BUILDING REMODEL AND SITE WORK

RFP CONTENTS
RFP Response Instructions
Design-Build Collaborative Preconstruction Proposal
Bid Bond
Subcontractor’s List
Non-Collusion Affidavit
DBE Certification
Certificate of Workers’ Compensation
Drug-Free Workplace Certification
DBE DB Preconstruction Contract
DBE GMP Agreement for Design-Build Services
General Conditions (GMP Contract)
Pre-Qualification Application
Liquidated Damages
Attachment A
343
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 2
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

CITY OF OROVILLE (OWNER)
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (“RFP”) FOR
CORPORATION YARD MULTI-BUILDING REMODEL AND SITE WORK PROJECT (“PROJECT”) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Oroville (“OWNER”) invites Design-Build Entities (hereinafter “DBE” or “Respondents”) to submit the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire and other written responses required by this RFP for the design and construction of Corporation Yard Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work Project (“Project”) on property owned by OWNER located at 655 Cal Oak Drive in the community of Oroville CA, 95965, Butte County, APN: 035-380-068

1. City of Oroville and the Project.

1.1. The City of Oroville (OWNER) The City of Oroville purchased the land with multiple existing buildings at 655 Cal Oak Drive to serve as a replacement to the current Corporation Yard utilized by the Public Works team at its current location 1275 Mitchell Ave. The Public Works team’s current facilities are outdated and unsuitable for the daily functions needed to perform daily operations for the City of Oroville. The City of Oroville has purchased the approx. 4.78 acre parcel and the adjoining 1.23 acre parcel. The City plans to make site improvements to the two lots including: the renovation and remodel of an existing approximately 3,300sf residential style building to be used for office space to include the expansion of the overall footprint with an additional 1400sf. Remodeling and renovation of an existing 15,000sf warehouse building, and nominal site work to include fencing and access gates. The proposed improvements will create one cohesive facility that enables the city to expand in the future and develop out other existing buildings in the future to meet the needs of the Public Works division as the City of Oroville continues to grow and expand.

1.2. Project Description. As provided, the Corporation Yard Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work Project under this RFP provides a 4.78 acre developed parcel. The project under this RFP shall provide a renovation of an approximately 3300sf office style building with an additional footprint expansion of approximately 1,400sf. The renovation is to include multiple bathrooms, training areas, laundry service areas, meeting areas, as well as a central meeting area. An existing 15,000sf metal warehouse shall include renovations of existing bathroom structures, office spaces, the construction of partition walls and the installation of new roll-up doors for functionality. Nominal flatwork and sitework to be included in the project and ADA upgrades for all public facing areas. Other site improvements include approaches, fencing, landscaping, and concrete hardscaping. The above square footages are current estimates. See Attachment A for general conceptualized scope.

1.3. Anticipated Project Costs. OWNER’s estimated projected cost for the Respondent’s design and construction of the Project (Project Construction Costs) is $1.75million. The project is not subject to Division of State Architect (“DSA”) review and will be permitted through the City of Oroville. Project is subject to Prevailing Wage.

1.4. Schedule. It is the intent of OWNER to enter into a contract for the Part 1, Preconstruction Services phase no later than the end of April 2025 and have Part 1, Preconstruction Services phase Work and Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) pricing completed by the end of May 2025. Subsequently, a DBE contract will be let for the Part 2, Design-Construct Services phase contingent upon the GMP pricing meeting OWNER budget requirements; OWNER receiving Board approval; and the consummation of financial arrangements which are contingent on Part 1, Preconstruction Phase GMP pricing. The DBE will have 60 days to complete Part 1, Preconstruction Phase services and approximately 104 calendar days to complete the design, submit a permit application to City of Oroville and receive necessary approvals as required to begin construction, and complete construction. OWNER’s goal is to have the Project completed Late Spring of 2026.

2. Request for Proposals.

2.1. General.

2.1.1. Purpose of RFP. The purpose of this RFP is for Respondents to submit materials establishing qualifications to provide the work, labor, materials and services necessary to complete OWNER Project programming, professional design, management and construction services for the project as proposed in entirety. This RFP is a single phase competitive process for the OWNER’s 344
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 3
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work selection of a DBE to complete programming, design and construction of the Project in two parts:

2.1.1.1. Part 1 – Preconstruction Phase Services: Phase I, Preconstruction Period Services will be performed for a stipulated or fixed amount. This first phase is associated with the Work of the DBE prior to the preparation of construction documents, permitting and start of construction services. Part 1 – Preconstruction Phase Services: Phase I, Preconstruction Period Services includes, but is not necessarily limited to, 1) completing OWNER Project programming; 2) production of required schematic design documents to 20% to 30% as necessary for DBE to depict programming and provide schematic drawings (criteria documents) that meets OWNER approval and provides DBE sufficient design criteria to create a design-build “Cost Model” and provide a GMP cost breakdown for all remaining design and construction work; and 3) develop schedules, bid trade packages and cost models/estimates needed, etc.

2.1.1.2. Part 2 – Design-Construct Phase Services: Phase 2, Design-Construct Period Services will be contingent upon the DBE providing an agreeable GMP, programming and schematics. The DBE will manage the Architectural/Engineering (A/E) as required to design to the “Cost Model” and provide “turnkey” construction and commissioning of the project.

2.2. Design-Build Approach. For this Project, OWNER is utilizing a Best Value, Guaranteed Maximum Not to Exceed Design-Build procurement method. OWNER intends to contract with a DBE to complete the programming and Construction Documents design; obtain all necessary permits/approvals for construction of the Project; and construct and commission the Project.

2.3. Obtaining RFP. This RFP must be obtained from Public Purchase or through the OWNER by contacting the OWNER’s Project Manager whose contact information is noted herein in Paragraph 2.4.

2.4. OWNER RFP Contacts. Communications relating to this RFP shall be directed to OWNER at:

Trover Construction Project Management LLC
Nick Trover, Project Manager
[email protected]
(530) 519-7132
974 rest Ave
Chico CA 95928

2.5. Pre-Proposal Conference. OWNER will conduct a Mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference: Wednesday February 5TH, 2025 @1:00PM. Respondents will meet at the Project site at 655 Cal Oak Drive, Oroville CA, 95965.

Latest Time/Date for RFP Submission. The latest date/time for submission of RFP Responses is Tuesday March 3rd, 2025 @4:00pm. OWNER will reject RFP Responses that are not actually received in the City Hall Main Office and stamped at or prior to the latest date/time for submission of RFP Responses for non-responsiveness. Respondents are solely responsible for the timely submission of RFP Responses. The address for delivery of RFP Responses is 1735 Montgomery St, Oroville CA, 95965.

2.6. OWNER Modifications to RFP. OWNER expressly reserves the right to modify any portion of this RFP prior to the latest date/time for submission of RFP Responses, including without limitation, the cancellation of this RFP. Modifications, if any, made by OWNER to the RFP will be in writing; potential Respondents who have obtained this RFP from OWNER prior to any such modifications will be issued modifications to the RFP by written addenda. All addenda issued by or on behalf of OWNER shall become part of the RFP. Addenda will be distributed only to the Respondents who have obtained the RFP from OWNER pursuant to Paragraph 2.4 above.

2.7. No Oral Clarifications/Modifications. OWNER will not provide any oral clarifications or modifications to the RFP or the requirements hereof; no employee, officer, agent or representative of OWNER is authorized to provide oral clarifications or modifications to the RFP. No Respondent shall rely on any oral clarification or modification to the RFP.

2.8. Unauthorized Communications. Unless and except when requested to do so in writing by OWNER or as otherwise permitted by this RFP, Respondents (including, without limitation, members of the DBE, SubConsultants and Subcontractors) shall not, prior to completion of the RFP, communicate, either verbally or in writing, with: (i) any member of the RFP Selection Committee; (ii) any consultant or professional 345
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 4
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work retained by OWNER for the purpose of providing OWNER advice or professional services in respect to the Project or the RFP; or (iii) any employee or representative of OWNER.

2.9. Public Records. All materials submitted in response to the RFP are deemed property of OWNER upon submission to the OWNER. Responses to the RFP and other materials submitted in connection therewith shall be deemed “public records” except for those marked or noted by a Respondent as “trade secrets” (as that term is defined and used in Civil Code §3426.1), “confidential” or “proprietary.” Financial statements are not subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act. The foregoing notwithstanding, OWNER may reject for non-responsiveness a Response to the RFP which indiscriminately notes that the Response or portions thereof are “Trade Secret,” “Confidential,” or “Proprietary” and exempt from disclosure as a public record. Notwithstanding the designation of materials submitted in response to the RFP as “public records” such materials shall not be subject to disclosure under the Public Records Act until after: (i) conclusion of negotiations between OWNER and Respondent(s) concerning RFP Responses and/or the terms, conditions and covenants of the DBE Contract; and (ii) a decision is made as to the Respondent to whom OWNER staff will recommend to the OWNER’s Board of Directors for award of the DBE Contract. OWNER is not liable or responsible for the disclosure of RFP Responses, or portions thereof, deemed to be public records, including those exempt from disclosure if law requires disclosure, by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction, or which occurs through inadvertence, mistake or negligence on the part of OWNER or its agents or representatives. If OWNER is required to defend or otherwise respond to any action or proceeding wherein request is made for the disclosure of the contents of any portion of an RFP Response deemed exempt from disclosure hereunder, by submitting an RFP Response, each Respondent agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless OWNER in any action or proceeding from and against any liability, including without limitation attorneys’ fees arising therefrom. The party submitting materials sought by any other party shall be solely responsible for the cost and defense in any action or proceeding seeking to compel disclosure of such materials; OWNER’s sole involvement in any such action shall be that of a disinterested stakeholder, retaining the requested materials until otherwise ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction.

2.10. Errors/Discrepancies/Clarifications to RFP. If a Respondent encounters errors or discrepancies in this RFP or portions hereof, the Respondent shall immediately notify OWNER’s Project Manager contact of such error or discrepancy. Any Respondent seeking clarification of any portion of this RFP shall submit the requested clarification in writing to OWNER’s Project Manager contact. Responses of OWNER to any requested clarification will be in writing (e-mails are acceptable); if in the sole judgment of OWNER, any clarification response affects the RFP or other Respondents, OWNER will issue the clarification response by a written addendum distributed to all potential Respondents who have theretofore obtained this RFP from OWNER. All requests for clarification of this RFP must be submitted and actually received by OWNER no later than Friday February 14
th, 2025. OWNER will not respond to clarification requests submitted thereafter. All communications to OWNER shall be as set forth in Paragraph 2.4 above.

Clarification responses will be distributed to all potential Respondents, who have theretofore obtained this RFP from OWNER, by written addendum no later than 72 hours before the latest date/time for submission of RFP Responses.

2.11. Continuing Obligation. Each Respondent is under a continuing obligation, commencing upon submission of its RFP Response, to immediately notify OWNER, in writing, if it learns that any of the following have occurred: (i) any statement made in any portion of its RFP Response was false, misleading or omits material facts rendering any statement in its RFP Response to be false or misleading; (ii) circumstances have occurred since the Respondent submitted its RFP Response that, if they had occurred prior to the date that the Respondent submitted its RFP Response, would have required the disclosure of such circumstances; or (iii) the Respondent has undergone a change in ownership in which ownership of fifty percent (50%) of more of its stock, ownership equity or assets has changed.

2.12. No Commitment to Award DBE Contract; OWNER Reservation of Rights. Issuance of this RFP and OWNER’s receipt or review of RFP Responses does not commit OWNER to award of the DBE Contract.

OWNER expressly reserves the right to modify the due date for RFP Responses, RFP requirements or action to award the DBE Contract in the sole and exclusive discretion of OWNER. Responses to the Design-Build Services Pre-Qualification Application (“Pre-Qualification Questionnaire”) included herein, including information about current bonding capacity, notarized statement from surety, and the most recent reviewed or audited financial statements, with accompanying notes and supplemental information, are required. OWNER will use these materials as the basis of rating the Respondents. OWNER reserves the right to check other sources available. OWNER’s decision will be based on objective evaluation criteria. OWNER reserves the right to waive minor irregularities in the RFP Responses. 346
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 5
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

2.13. Notice of Appeal and Hearing. A Respondent who timely submits an RFP Response that is not the highest scored RFP Response may appeal its RFP Response score (“RFP Appeal”) by strict compliance with the following. RFP Appeals must be in writing and must be submitted to the OWNER’s Project Manager identified in Paragraph 2.4 above by 4:00 PM on the fifth (5th) working day after the latest date for submittal of RFP Responses. The RFP Appeal must include: (i) all factual basis for the RFP Appeal; (ii) all evidentiary materials supporting the factual basis for the RFP Appeal; and (iii) all legal authority supporting the RFP Appeal. If a Respondent timely submits an RFP Appeal strictly conforming to the foregoing, OWNER will schedule an RFP Appeal Hearing within ten (10) days of the date of submittal of an RFP Appeal. OWNER will endeavor to schedule the RFP Appeal Hearing upon mutual agreement with the Respondent submitting the RFP Appeal, but OWNER expressly reserves the right to unilaterally schedule the RFP Appeal Hearing. The RFP Appeal Hearing is an informal process conducted by a panel of OWNER employees and/or OWNER consultants authorized by OWNER to conduct the RFP Appeal Hearing and to render a decision on behalf of OWNER to a RFP Appeal. The Respondent submitting an RFP Appeal will be afforded the opportunity to present witnesses and evidentiary materials supporting the RFP Appeal. Witnesses presented by the Respondent submitting a RFP Response will be required to testify under oath and are subject to cross-examination by the Appeal Panel. The Appeal Panel will issue rulings on RFP Appeals in writing (“RFP Appeal Decision”) within three (3) business days of the conclusion of an RFP Appeals Hearing. RFP Appeal Decisions constitute OWNER’s final administrative action an RFP Appeal and not subject to further administrative review.

2.14. No Warranty by OWNER. Respondents are solely responsible to satisfy themselves as to the suitability of any information provided by OWNER that is in the nature of estimates of costs, statements of needs or requirements, projections, budgets, or other information describing the proposed DBE Contract and/or Project contemplated by this RFP. Nothing stated in this RFP or any portion hereof shall be construed as implying the creation or existence of any warranty, express or implied, on the part of OWNER with respect to the accuracy, sufficiency or completeness of such information.

2.15. Informational Summaries. Portions of these RFP instructions include summaries of the process that OWNER currently contemplates for completion of the RFP process. Such summaries are provided for the convenience of the Respondents and cannot be interpreted as a complete or definitive statement of all procedures, conditions, requirements or standards that may apply to any of the aforementioned processes. OWNER reserves the right, at any time and in the exercise of its sole and absolute discretion, to modify such procedures, conditions, requirements or standards, by changes, additions or deletions thereto.

2.16. RFP Response Costs. All costs and expenses incurred by a Respondent to prepare and submit a response to this RFP shall be borne solely and exclusively by the Respondent.

2.17. DBE Interviews, Negotiations and BAFO.

2.17.1. OWNER Reservation of Rights. OWNER expressly reserves the right to conduct negotiations and discussions with DBEs submitting responsive RFP Responses. Such negotiations and discussions, if conducted by OWNER, shall be conducted in a fair and impartial manner.

Interviews. Prior to engaging in negotiations with any Respondent, OWNER will conduct interviews of all Respondents timely submitting a responsive RFP Response. Each interview will be scheduled for a one (1) hour period at OWNER’s administration office located at 1735 Montgomery St, Oroville CA, 95965. A Covid compliant alternative may be made at the need and discretion of OWNER. The primary purpose of the interview is for DBE members to respond to questions posed by OWNER’s interview committee and for the DBE members to provide the interview committee with additional details of the relative benefits of the DBE’s approach to completing programming, design and construction of the Project. Attendance at the interview is mandatory for: (i) personnel of the DBE with authority to bind and commit the DBE; (ii) the AOR personnel with supervisory responsibilities during the Design Phase of the Project and supervisory responsibilities during the Construction Phase of the Project; (iii) the General Contractor’s Project Manager and Field Superintendent. Failure of a Respondent to attend its interview at the time and place designated by OWNER and all DBE personnel identified hereinabove will result in rejection of such Respondent’s RFP Response for nonresponsiveness. To ensure fair and impartial negotiations and discussions, the following procedures will be implemented: (i) all Respondents submitting a responsive RFP Response will be invited to participate in the interviews; (ii) the order of interviews with Respondents will be randomly selected by OWNER; and (iii) each Respondent must have present at the scheduled date/time of its interview with OWNER, its principals or others with full and complete 347
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 6
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work authority to bind the Respondent.

2.17.2. Negotiations/Discussions. OWNER may, in the sole discretion of OWNER, engage in negotiations and/or discussions with one or more of the Respondents after completion of all Respondent interviews. The nature and scope of OWNER’s negotiations/discussions with Respondents may include identical areas of inquiry for all Respondents, or differing areas of inquiry for different Respondents. OWNER shall have the sole discretion to establish the nature and scope of negotiations/discussions with a Respondent based on OWNER’s review of the Respondent’s RFP Response and interview and the areas or subject matters reflected in the RFP Response that OWNER believes require additional discussion or negotiation with a Respondent.

2.17.3. Best and Final Offer (“BAFO”). OWNER reserves the right to engage in a BAFO process as described herein. The Respondents requested to submit a BAFO and the subject matter(s) of OWNER’s BAFO request shall be at the sole and exclusive discretion of OWNER. If a Respondent is requested to submit a BAFO, the failure of such Respondent to submit its BAFO within the time designated by OWNER and incorporate into its BAFO all matters, items or issues for which OWNER requests a BAFO, will result in the RFP Response of such Respondent being deemed non-responsive and not further considered for award of the DBE Contract. The scope of matters for which a BAFO may be requested may include, without limitation, pricing, alternatives to or clarifications of design concepts, programming clarifications, type of construction, material, equipment selection, schedule and other similar matters.

2.18. Bid Security; Forfeiture of Bid Security. Each RFP Response shall be accompanied by Bid Security in the form of: (i) cash, (ii) a certified or cashier’s check made payable to OWNER or (iii) a Bid Bond, in the form and content attached hereto, in favor of OWNER executed by the Bidder as a principal and a Surety as surety (the “Bid Security”) in an amount equal to at least ten percent (10%) of OWNER’s estimated Project Construction Costs $1.75 million. Any RFP Response submitted without the required Bid Security is non-responsive and will be rejected. If the Bid Security is in the form of a Bid Bond, a Proposal will be deemed non-responsive and rejected if: (i) the Bid Bond is not in the form and content included herein; (ii) the Surety is not an Admitted Surety Insurer under Code of Civil Procedure §995.120; or (iii) the Surety is not at A.M. Best rated A/VII. If the Respondent awarded the DBE Contract fails or refuses to execute the DBE Contract within ten (10) calendar days from the date of receiving notification that it is the Respondent to whom the DBE Contract has been awarded, OWNER may declare the Respondent’s Bid Security forfeited as damages caused by the failure of the Respondent to enter into the DBE Contract.

2.19. Non-Collusion Affidavit. The form of Non-Collusion Affidavit included with the RFP must be completed and duly executed on behalf of the Respondent. The failure of a Respondent to submit a completed and executed Non-Collusion Affidavit with its Proposal will result in rejection of the Proposal for nonresponsiveness.

2.20. Subcontractors.

2.20.1. Designation of Subcontractors; Subcontractors List. Each Respondent shall, concurrently with submission of the Respondent’s Proposal, submit a list of its proposed Subcontractors for the Project on the form included with this RFP.

2.20.2. Subcontractors Not Identified in Subcontractors List. Subcontractors engaged by the successful Respondent to construct a portion of the Project who are not identified in the Subcontractors List submitted with the Respondent’s Proposal shall be selected by the successful Respondent and the Subcontracts therefor awarded by the successful Respondent

2.21. Wage Rates. The Project will be procured as a Prevailing Wage Project.

3. The Consulting Architect and Bridging Documents.

3.1. Consulting Architect. OWNER has not retained a “Consulting Architect” to prepare the Bridging Documents and to provide assistance to OWNER during preparation of the RFP, preconstruction and construction of the Project.

3.2. Project Bridging Documents. OWNER has prepared “Bridging Documents” for this project, Project Bridging Documents consist of Attachment A. Project Bridging Documents are attached herewith.

Electronic copies can be obtained by requesting the documents from OWNER’s Project Manager contact set forth in Paragraph 2.4 above.

4. Design-Build Preconstruction and Design Build Contracts. The form and content of the Agreement for DesignBuild Preconstruction Services and Agreement for Design-Build Services and related General Conditions, which OWNER intends to enter into with the successful DBE, are included herein. Acknowledgement of 348
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 7
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work review of these documents are a requirement and deliverable in the Price Proposal submittal (see Paragraph

6.4 Price Proposal Format).

5. Evaluation Criteria.

5.1. DBE Contract Award. If the DBE Contract is awarded, the award of the DBE Contract will be let to the Respondent submitting the Proposal with highest numerical score which provides the “Best Value” to OWNER based upon qualifications and price utilizing the following two envelope evaluation criteria:

5.1.1. Respondent’s responses to the RFP shall be submitted in two separate envelopes.

5.1.1.1. Price Envelope. The “Price Envelope” includes the Design-Build Preconstruction Proposal with the Respondent’s proposed mark-up percentage for the Part 2 Design- Construct Phase Contract if awarded, and the Respondent’s proposed Lump Sum Amount for Part 2 Design-Construct Services General Condition requirements for the Project during construction. The Design-Build Preconstruction Proposal also includes the fixed Lump Sum Amount of Thirty thousand no/100’s Dollars ($30,000.00) for all Respondents for Design-Build Preconstruction Phase Contract services. The price is the amount each Respondent agrees to receive for completing Part 1 Preconstruction Phase Services. The Price Proposal criteria for mark-up percentage and proposed Lump Sum General Condition costs will be scored in accordance with Paragraph 7.4.1. The Price Proposal score will represent 30% of the Respondent’s total “Best Value” score.

5.1.1.2. Technical Envelope. The “Technical Envelope” includes all non-price factors and will consist of the evaluation criteria items listed in Paragraph 6.3.3 below. Each Technical Proposal content evaluation criteria will be scored along with a relative weight given to each evaluation criteria as provided in Paragraph 7.4.2. The total “Technical Score” received by the Respondent will represent 30% of the total “Best Value” score.

5.1.1.3. Interview. The Respondent’s interview will be scored in accordance with Paragraph

7.4.3 and represents 40% of the Respondent’s score.

5.1.2. Opening of Envelopes. The “Technical Envelope” will be opened and scored first on a weighted criteria basis as outlined in Paragraph 7.4.2. The “Price Envelope” proposals will be opened after the technical proposals are scored and the interviews are given and scored. When the “Price Envelope” is opened the project Respondent’s price will be scored in accordance with Paragraph

7.4.1. 5.1.3. Acceptable Safety Record. For purposes of the foregoing, a Respondent’s safety record is deemed “acceptable” if its experience modification rate for the most recent three-year period is an average of 1.00 or less, and its average total recordable injury or illness rate and average lost work rate for the most recent three-year period does not exceed the applicable statistical standards for its business category or if the Respondent is a party to an alternative dispute resolution system pursuant to Section 3201.5 of the Labor Code. If the DBE’s EMR for the most recent three (3) year period exceeds an average of 1.0, the DBEs will a scored a “0” for Safety Record.

5.1.4. Prior Experience. For purposes of the foregoing, the “prior experience” of a Respondent will be limited to prior experience of the Respondent with: (i) completed design-build projects; and (ii) design-build experience within the past five (5) years for the following types of project owners: (i) municipalities; (ii) counties; (iii) private sector owners; and (iv) educational/non-profit.

6. RFP Response.

6.1. RFP Activities; Timeline. The following is a description of the principle activities to be completed under this RFP and the timeline for completion of each activity. The following notwithstanding, OWNER expressly reserves the right to modify the extent, nature or scope of RFP activities and/or the timeline for commencing/completing RFP activities by issuance of addenda reflecting such modification:

Activity Completion Date
RFP Advertising (Published date) Tuesday January 21st, 2025 Mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference Wednesday February 5TH, 2025 @1:00PM
349
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 8
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work Last day for submittal of RFP Questions by fax or email Friday February 14 th, 2025
Responses to RFP Questions issued by OWNER Friday February 21st, 2025 Latest date and time for RFP Submission Tuesday March 3rd, 2025 @4:00pm
RFP Response Reviews
Interviews Week of March 17th, 2025
Issue Letter of Intent to Award DBE Agreement for Design-Build Preconstruction Services
Monday March 24th, 2025
Council Approval of DBE Preconstruction Contract Tuesday April 1st, 2025 Issue DBE Agreement for Design-Build Preconstruction Services Monday, April 7th, 2025

6.2. RFP Response; General.

6.2.1. RFP Response. All materials submitted in response to this RFP shall be on 8 ½” x 11” paper, preferably in portrait orientation, 12 point (or larger) Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman font with 1” page margins on all sides. Mistakes may be crossed out and corrections made adjacent, however, the person signing the Design-Build Services Pre-Qualification Application must initial each correction. All submitted materials must be bound in either a three-ring binder or spiral bound notebook. Tabbed dividers should be used to identify and separate discrete sections of the RFP Response, which correspond to the RFP Response Formats described in Paragraphs

6.3 and 6.4 below.

6.2.2. Additional Materials. Respondents are not prohibited, but are discouraged, from submitting materials in addition to those specifically required by this RFP. If a Respondent elects to submit additional materials, all such additional materials must be submitted in a separate sealed envelope (container) with the exterior prominently marked with the Respondent’s name and notation: “ADDITIONAL RFP RESPONSE MATERIALS.”

6.2.3. Copies of RFP Response. Each Respondent shall submit one (1) complete electronic version on a flash drive for the Technical Proposal, one (1) original and five (5) copies of their respective RFP Technical and Price Responses/Proposals.

6.3. Technical Proposal Format/Contents. Each RFP Response must conform to the following described format and must include the content described below. Failure of a Respondent to submit its RFP Response in a format and with content not conforming to the following requirements will be a basis for the OWNER’s rejection of such RFP Response for non-responsiveness.

6.3.1. Cover Sheet. Identify the submittal as the Response to this RFP and an identification of the DBE Team submitting the RFP Response along with the DBE’s address, telephone/fax numbers, and email addresses of the DBE’s principal contact in connection with this RFP and/or the RFP Response.

6.3.2. Letter of Interest. Include a brief letter expressing the interest of the Respondent in providing Design-Build services in a single phase Design-Build “Best Value” competitive process for OWNER’s selection of a DBE to complete design and construction of the Project in two parts:

Part 1, Preconstruction Period Services performed for a stipulated or fixed amount and Part 2, Design-Construct Services in which the contract will be contingent upon the DBE providing an agreeable GMP, programming, and schematics to OWNER.

The Letter of Interest shall include:

6.3.2.1. A brief statement the DBE will manage the Architectural/Engineering (A/E) as required to complete programming, schematics and design to the “Cost Model” as required provide “turnkey” construction and commissioning of the project.

6.3.2.2. A brief statement of the qualifications of the Respondent to complete Design-Build services for the Project.

6.3.2.3. Confirmation the Respondent’s agrees to enter into Agreement for Design-Build Preconstruction Services and Agreement for Design-Build Services contracts if selected, and all information in the RFP is accurate under penalty of perjury.

6.3.2.4. Provide contact information, including the telephone number, fax number and email address for the personnel of the Respondent who will be receiving notices and other 350
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 9
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work communications from OWNER regarding the RFP.

6.3.2.5. An individual authorized to contractually bind the Respondent shall sign cover letter.

6.3.2.6. There is no tab requirement for this introduction item. The Cover Sheet should be bound with other materials responding to this RFP.

6.3.3. Table of Contents. Include a Table of Contents reflecting each Paragraph 6.3.4 tabs of the RFP Response. There is no tab requirement for this introduction item.

6.3.4. Project Specific Requirements:

6.3.4.1. Tab 1: Pre-Qualification Application Questionnaire. Each Respondent must complete the Pre-Qualification Application (“Pre-Qualification Questionnaire”) included and submit the application in Tab 1. OWNER’s Selection Committee will evaluate and score each Pre-Qualification Questionnaire for completeness; conformance to project requirements; history of violations, claims, arbitration and/or litigation; and other requirements. Pre-Qualification Applications must be signed under penalty of perjury in the manner designated at the end of the Pre-Qualification Application, by an individual who has the legal authority to bind the Respondent on whose behalf that person is signing. If any information provided by a Respondent becomes inaccurate, the Respondent must immediately notify OWNER and provide updated accurate information in writing, under penalty of perjury.

6.3.4.2. Tab 2: Relevant Project Experience. Provide additional General Contractor and Design Professional’s design and construction profiles of the projects identified in the Design-Build Services Pre-Qualification Application. The “prior experience” of a Respondent will be scored separately on the General Contractor’s and Design Professional’s individual experience with any project using the Design Build delivery method and then limited to the Respondent’s General Contractor’s and Design Professional’s individual prior experience with design-build within the past five (5) years for the following types of project owners: (i) municipalities; (ii) counties; (iii) private sector owners; and (iv) educational/non-profit. Clearly identify the relevance of each project, addressing relevance to the proposed Project. The projects should demonstrate the DBE’s design and construction experience on similar projects in terms of new construction, similar in size, scope, complexity, including specific experience in educational facilities and design-build experience. This section of the RFP Response shall not exceed ten (10) pages.

6.3.4.3. Tab 3: Project Organization. Provide information on the organization of the Project personnel that will be used to deliver the project. Define key personnel of the Respondent (General Contractor) and Architect of Record (AOR) for Preconstruction and Design and Construction team components and how the teams will be managed; the decision-making process proposed; and the qualifications of the key personnel. Identify each person proposed as part of the Design Team and indicate whether such proposed personnel are employees of the Respondent, an employee of the Respondent’s teaming Design firm, Sub-Consultant to the Respondent or an independent contractor to the Respondent. Include an organizational chart for Part 1 Preconstruction Phase Services and Part 2 DesignConstruct Phase Services illustrating the relationships: (i) among the Respondent’s proposed Project Team; and (ii) between the proposed Project Team and OWNER.

6.3.4.4. Tab 4: Proposed Project Team. Identify the key members of the Respondents’ General Contractor and Architectural personnel that will be assigned to the PreConstruction and Construction phases of the Project. The following personnel must be minimally included in the proposed Project Team: General Contractor’s Project Manager and/or Design Manager, Architect of Record’s Project Manager and/or Design Manager, Structural Engineer; Mechanical Engineer; Electrical Engineer; Civil Engineer; and Construction Field Superintendent, Scheduler and Cost Estimator. If any of the personnel of the proposed Project Team are different from the proposed Project Team identified by a Respondent in its Pre-Qualification Application, resumes detailing the education and experience that relates to OWNER’s project of such different personnel must be included under this tab.

Describe in graphic and written form, the proposed Project assignments and lines of authority and communication for each team member to be directly involved in the 351
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 10
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work Project. Indicate the percentage of time these members will be involved in the Project for Preconstruction and Construction Services. Affirm individuals identified will be committed for the entire duration of the project. For the team members listed, please provide their current workload information and their availability to start attending meetings, drawing reviews, and participate in programming, schematic design and cost analysis exercises

6.3.4.5. Tab 5: Project Personnel Resumes. Submit resumes demonstrating the qualifications of key personnel defined on the organization chart for the Project. Key personnel are those who will be working directly with OWNER including: General Contractor’s project executive, project manager, and superintendent, and the design professional or architect and project manager. Resumes shall include:

6.3.4.5.1. Experience on projects of similar size, scope, complexity and budget.

6.3.4.5.2. Experience with design build delivery method where collaboration during the design phase and construction is demonstrated.

6.3.4.5.3. Relevant qualifications, background, and any projects team members that have previously worked as members of an integrated team Professional certifications and technical experience.

6.3.4.6. Tab 6 Project Approach. Provide a description of the proposed Project Team’s approach and methodology to completing tasks necessary to complete OWNER’s programming, schematic drawings, scheduling, Life Cycle costing and provide GMP pricing working collaboratively with OWNER’s project management team. Further provide a description of the Respondent’s proposed approach to the Preconstruction phase of the Project set forth in the Part 1 – Preconstruction Phase Services as required to deliver the scope of work within the 60-day schedule provided. Include the Respondent’s control systems for document control, planning, scheduling, and cost management.

6.3.4.7. Tab 7: Project Schedule. Provide a narrative that includes a graphic or text narrative of the anticipated dates for the following milestones: (i) DBE completion of OWNER Project programming; production of required schematic design documents to 20% to 30% necessary for DBE to depict programming and provide schematic drawings that meets OWNER approval; development of Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) cost breakdown for all remaining design and construction work; and the development of project schedules, bid trade packages and cost models/estimates needed, etc.; (ii) completion of design development and construction documents sufficient for submittal to City of Oroville; (iii) issuance of construction permit; (iv) commencement of field construction activities; and (v) Project Final Completion.

6.3.4.8. Tab 8: Financial Statement. Include a current financial statement (2024CY or 2022/2023 FY) for the Respondent. Financial Statements must be reviewed or audited by a Certified Public Accountant.

6.3.4.9. Tab 9: Insurance Certificates. Provide copies of Certificates of Insurance for the Respondent and its proposed AOR and Design Consultants for the mechanical, structural, electrical, and civil design disciplines. Required Certificates of Insurance and minimum coverage amounts for each policy of insurance are as set forth below.

OWNER reserves the right to modify the minimum coverage limits for each policy of insurance on the Project.

Required Insurance
Policy Certificate
Minimum DBE
Coverage Limits
Minimum AOR
Coverage Limits
Minimum Design
Consultants
Coverage Limits
Workers Compensation In accordance with law In accordance with law In accordance with law Employers Liability One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per
occurrence
One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per
occurrence
One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per
occurrence
Comprehensive
General Liability
(including property
One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per
claim/Two Million
One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per
claim/Two Million
One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per
claim/Two Million
352
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 11
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work Required Insurance
Policy Certificate
Minimum DBE
Coverage Limits
Minimum AOR
Coverage Limits
Minimum Design
Consultants
Coverage Limits
damage and
automobile liability)
Dollars ($2,000,000)
aggregate
Dollars ($2,000,000)
aggregate
Dollars ($2,000,000)
aggregate
Professional Liability One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per
claim/Two Million
Dollars ($2,000,000)
aggregate, if the DBE
is also the AOR
One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per
claim/Two Million
Dollars ($2,000,000)
aggregate, if the AOR
is subcontractor to
DBE
One Million Dollars
($1,000,000) per
claim/Two Million
Dollars ($2,000,000)
aggregate

6.3.4.10.Tab 10: Safety Record. Include submission of evidence that establishes the DBE’s safety record. For purposes of this RFP, an “acceptable safety record” is a Workers Compensation Insurance experience (EMR) for the most recent three (3) year period that is an average of 1.0 or less, and an average total recordable injury or illness rate and average lost work rate for the most three (3) year period does not exceed the applicable statistical standards for the construction industry. If the DBE’s EMR for the most recent three (3) year period exceeds an average of 1.0, the DBEs will a scored a “0” for Safety Record.

6.3.4.11.Tab 11: Geographic Location of Home Office. Include submission of evidence that establishes that DBE has a current home office located either within a 40-mile radius from OWNER; within a 75-mile radius from OWNER; or exceeds 75-mile radius from OWNER. If the DBE’s home office location exceeds a 75-mile radius from OWNER, then the DBE will receive a score of “0” for this tab requirement.

6.4. Price Proposal Format. The Price Proposal portion of RFP Responses shall include the following items in the order noted below:

6.4.1. Tab A: Proposal. Completed and executed form of Proposal and Proposal Attachments included in this RFP.

6.4.2. Tab B: Non-Collusion Affidavit. Complete and execute the form of Non-Collusion Affidavit included with this RFP.

6.4.3. Tab C: DBE Certification. Complete and execute the form of DBE Certification included with this RFP.

6.4.4. Tab D: Bid Security (if required). If the Bid Security of the DBE responding to this RFP is in the form of a Bid Bond, incorporate the form of the Bid Bond included with this RFP. The form and content of the Bid Bond must be identical to the form of Bid Bond included with this RFP and must be executed on behalf of the DBE and the Surety issuing the Bid Bond, along with Attorney in Fact Certifications and duly executed notary acknowledgements of the signatures therein. If the Bid Security of the DBE is in the form of a cashier’s check or cash, such DBE shall note the form of Bid Security in Tab D and shall include a separate sealed envelope containing the cashier’s check or cash Bid Security. Failure of a Respondent to submit the required Bid Security in accordance with the foregoing will result in the rejection of such Respondent’s RFP Response for non-responsiveness.

6.4.5. Tab E: Design-Build Preconstruction Services Agreement Phase Contract Terms and Conditions.

Each DBE must thoroughly review the Design-Build Preconstruction Services Phase Contract and must, in Tab E of their respective RFP responses, identify any term or condition of DesignBuild Preconstruction Phase Contract which the Respondent requests modification, by amendment to existing provisions, addition of additional provisions or deletion of existing provisions. Where any requested modification consists of amendments to existing provisions or additional provisions, Tab E of the RFP Response must set forth the specific text of the requested amendment or addition. A Respondent’s modification or objection to any existing term, condition or provision in the Design-Build Preconstruction Phase Contract shall not, however, be deemed OWNER’s acceptance thereof. The RFP Response of a Respondent which does not identify modifications to terms or conditions of the attached Design-Build Preconstruction Phase Contract will be deemed to have agreed to all terms and conditions set forth therein; if awarded the Design353 Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 12
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work Build Preconstruction Phase Contract, such Respondent must execute the Design-Build Preconstruction Phase Contract without modification. Notwithstanding the inclusion of any requested modifications to any portion of the Design-Build Preconstruction Phase Contract in any Respondent’s RFP Response, such modifications shall not be binding upon OWNER unless: (i) the Design-Build Preconstruction Phase Contract is awarded to such Respondent; and (ii) OWNER at or prior to the time of award of the Design- Build Preconstruction Phase Contract has accepted such modifications by a written instrument duly executed by an authorized employee or representative of OWNER. If Respondent does not take any exceptions to the Design-Build Preconstruction Phase Contract Terms and Conditions, provide a statement for Tab E stating “no exceptions taken.”

6.4.6. Tab F: Agreement for Design-Build Services Contract Terms and Conditions. Each DBE must thoroughly review the Design-Build Services Contract and must, in Tab F of their respective RFP responses, identify any term or condition of the DBE Contract which the Respondent requests modification, by amendment to existing provisions, addition of additional provisions or deletion of existing provisions. Where any requested modification consists of amendments to existing provisions or additional provisions, Tab F of the RFP Response must set forth the specific text of the requested amendment or addition. A Respondent’s modification or objection to any existing term, condition or provision in the DBE Contract shall not, however, be deemed OWNER’s acceptance thereof. The RFP Response of a Respondent which does not identify modifications to terms or conditions of the attached DBE Contract will be deemed to have agreed to all terms and conditions set forth therein; if awarded the DBE Contract, such Respondent must execute the DBE Contract without modification. Notwithstanding the inclusion of any requested modifications to any portion of the DBE Contract in any Respondent’s RFP Response, such modifications shall not be binding upon OWNER unless: (i) the DBE Contract is awarded to such Respondent; and (ii) OWNER at or prior to the time of award of the DBE Contract has accepted such modifications by a written instrument duly executed by an authorized employee or representative of OWNER. If Respondent does not take any exceptions to the DBE Contract Terms and Conditions, provide a statement for Tab F stating “no exceptions taken.”

7. Scoring. RFP Evaluations Technical Scoring Criteria.

7.1. General. Timely submitted RFP Responses will be independently reviewed by each member of the Selection Committee. A Response to the RFP, which does not comply with the requirements of this RFP, will be subject to rejection for non-responsiveness.

7.2. OWNER Policy. It is the policy of OWNER that the selection of firms to provide professional services in connection with construction projects of OWNER be based on the demonstrated competence and qualifications to complete the required professional services at a fair and reasonable price to OWNER.

7.3. Initial Evaluation Criteria. The following sets forth the criteria by which each RFP Response Technical score will be evaluated. See Paragraph 7.4.2 for the relative weight of each Technical Score Criteria Tabs 1 through 10. The maximum “Technical Score” is 300 points. The total Technical score points of will be added to the total score for the Price Proposal score out of 300 points and Interview score out of 400 points. The DBE Preconstruction Contract, if awarded, will be to the Respondent submitting the highest total points out of a maximum of 1,000 total points.

7.4. Scoring.

7.4.1. Price Proposal.

7.4.1.1. Preconstruction Services Price. There will be no scoring for the “Preconstruction Services Price.” The “Preconstruction Services Contract Price” for completion of Part 1 - Preconstruction Phase services for the Project will be a fixed price, the fixed Lump Sum Amount of Thirty thousand and no/100’s Dollars ($30,000.00) for the successful Respondent to complete programming, schematic design, scheduling, Life Cycle costing and Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) pricing and related preconstruction activities of the Project.

7.4.1.2. Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services Scoring of Total Fee Percentage. Total Fee percentage of the Respondent’s proposed Profit and Overhead for the Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services. Total Fee percentage will be scored in direct relation to the Respondent’s variance from the lowest fee based on the average fee. 354
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 13
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work The lowest Total Fee percentage will receive the maximum score of 150 points.

For Example
Proposed Fee
%
Variation from
Lowest Fee =
Proposed Fee %
Less Lowest
Fee %
% Variation =
Variation from Lowest
Fee % Divided By
Average Fee%
Points to Deduct
From Maximum
Points of 150
Proposed Fee
% Score Points
10% 10%-10%=0% 0%/11%=0% 150 x 0% = 0 150-0=150
11% 11%-10%=1% 1%/11%=9% 150 x 9% = 14 150-14=136
12% 12%-10%=2% 2%/11%=18% 150 x 18% = 27 150-27=123
Sample calculation: Average fee = (10+11+12)/3 = 11%
Points to Deduct from Maximum Points of 150 = Maximum Points x % Variation

7.4.1.3. Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services Scoring of General Conditions Lump Sum Total Fee. The Respondent’s proposed General Conditions Lump Sum Fee Total for the Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services will be scored in direct relation to the Respondent’s variance from the lowest Lump Sum Fee based on the average fee. The lowest Lump Sum Total Fee percentage will receive the maximum score of 150 points.

For Example
Proposed
GC Lump
Sum Fee
Variation from
Lowest Fee=
Proposed Fee Less
Lowest Fee
% Variation =
Variation from Fee
Variation Divided by
Average Fee
Points to Deduct
from Maximum
Points of 150
Proposed GC
Lump Sum
Fee Score
Points
$44,800 $44,800- $44,800=$0 $0/$54,133=0% 150 x 0% = 0 150-0=150 $56,000 $56,000-
$44,800=$11,200 $11,200/54,133=21% 150 x 21% = 32 150-32=118 $61,600 $61,600-
$41,800=$19,800
$19,800/$54,133%=37
% 150 x 37% = 56 150-56=94
Sample calculation: Average fee = ($44,800+$56,000+$61,600)/3 = $54,133 Points to Deduct from Maximum Points of 150 = Maximum Points x % Variation

7.4.2. Technical Score. The Selection Committee will determine Respondents “Technical Score” using the “Weighted Criteria” scoring method described below. The total “Technical Score” received by the Respondent will represent 30% of the total “Best Value” score. The maximum “Technical Score” is 300 points.

Tab No. Description Maximum
Score
Weighted
Value
Total
Points
Tab 1: DBE
Pre-Qualification
Application
A. General Contractor 10 1 10
B. Design Professional 10 1 10
Tab 2:
1) Relevant Public
Experience
A. General Contractor 10 5 50
B. Design Professional 10 2 20
2) Relevant DB
Project Experience
General Contractor
A. Governmental 10 4 40
B. Private 10 2 20
3) Relevant DB
Project Experience
Design Professional
A. Governmental 10 2 20
B. Private 10 1 10
355
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 14
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work Tab No. Description Maximum
Score
Weighted
Value
Total
Points
Tab 3: Project
Organization
10 1 10
Tab 4: Project Team 10 1 10
Tab 5: Project
Personnel Resumes
10 1 10
Tab 6: Project
Approach
10 2 20
Tab 7: Financial
Statement
10 1 10
Tab 8: Insurance
Certificates
10 1 10
Tab 9: Safety Record 10 1 10
Tab 10: Geographic
Location of Home
Office
A. Within a 40-mile radius 10 4 40
B. Within a 75-mile radius 10 1
C. Exceeds 75-mile radius 10 0
Total Maximum Points 300

7.4.3. Proposal Interviews/Interview Scoring (400 Points):

7.4.3.1. Interview Requirements. The Selection Committee will conduct interviews with each of the Respondents timely submitting RFP Responses. The total “Interview Score” received by the Respondent will represent 40% of the total “Best Value” score. The maximum “Interview Score” is 400 points. The purpose of the interview is for the Respondent to present and confirm information provided in the RFP Response. In these interviews, the Respondent and its team may expand on the information provided in its RFP Response and will respond to questions from the Selection Committee. Each Respondent shall have their proposed key personnel assigned the Project present as the primary representatives during this process.

7.4.3.2. Interview Format. Each Respondent will have 10 minutes to setup, 30 minutes to present on the minimal OWNER deliverables for the Proposal Interview presentation relating to the Respondent’s DBE team, and proposed preconstruction approach to achieve OWNER’s Project objectives within the budget constraints and time limits established for the Project. The Selection Committee will follow the presentation with a Question and Answer (Q&A) session of no more than 20 minutes. The following is a list of minimal deliverables for the Proposal Interview presentation with their related weighted scores:

Deliverables
Maximum
Score
1-10
Weighted
Value
Maximum
Total
Points
Project Team
• Introduction on Project Team
• General Contractor & Design Professional
experience(s) prior collaboration(s) and delivery of DB and like projects
• Personnel assigned to the Pre-Construction and
Construction Phases of the Project
• Personnel roles & responsibilities
10 5 50
Project Approach
356
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 15
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work • Preconstruction overall approach 10 3 30
• Completing programming 10 2 20
• Completing schematics and design concept 10 3 30
• Develop development of project schedules, bid trade
packages and “Cost Models”/estimates needed, etc.
10 2 20
• Developing the GMP within the OWNER’s established
budget 10 3
30 Scheduling

Does the Respondent feel the schedule can be achieved?
Describe Respondent’s approach to assuring timely completion of this project, including methods for schedule recovery, if necessary (scheduling strategy to meet a very tight scheduling requirement)
10 10 100
Safety Approach
Safety plans; addressing the ability to stay in line with construction schedules while the site will be used in part by the city’s public works and utilities divisions
10 5 50
OWNER closing question for Respondent Teams 10 2 20
Overall evaluation of the quality of the Team’s presentation 10 5 50 Total Possible Interview Technical Points

400

7.4.3.3. Respondent Interview Materials. Respondent interview materials may include presentation boards and/or electronic presentations describing the Respondent’s RFP Response and approach to completing Project programming, preconstruction services, design and construction services. Interview materials must be exclusively devoted to the Respondent’s proposed completion of Project programming, schematic design, scheduling GMP pricing and design construct delivery and must not be in the nature of marketing materials. Respondents must provide eight (8) copies of all interview presentation materials in three-ring binders along with an electronic copy of the interview materials.

8. Award of DBE Contract. Award of the DBE Preconstruction Contract will only be by action of OWNER’s Board of Directors. OWNER reserves the right to waive minor irregularities or informalities in the Proposals or to reject all Proposals.
[END OF SECTION]
357
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 16
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

DESIGN-BUILD COLLABORATIVE PRECONSTRUCTION PROPOSAL
To Designated Appointee for The City of Oroville (“OWNER”), the undersigned proposes to provide the work, labor, materials and services necessary to complete the design and construction of the work of improvement commonly described as the City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – MultiBuilding Remodel and Site Work (“Project”).

1. Proposal Submission. This Proposal is submitted by ________________________________ (“Respondent”); if the DBE Preconstruction Contract for the Project is awarded to the Respondent, the Respondent will execute the DBE Pre-construction Contract included with the Contract Documents and shall complete programming, schematic design, scheduling, Life Cycle costing and Guaranteed Maximum Price pricing of the Project in accordance with the Contract Documents for the Lump Sum Contract Price and within the Contract Time set forth therein.

2. Respondent Acknowledgements. By submitting this Proposal, the Respondent acknowledges that the Respondent has: (i) carefully reviewed and examined the Bridging Documents; (ii) conducted observations of the site as deemed reasonable and prudent by the Respondent; (iii) carefully reviewed and examined the Contract Documents; (iv) been afforded the opportunity to request clarification or explanation of the Bridging Documents and the Contract Documents; and (v) committed to acceptance of this Proposal by OWNER within sixty (60) days of the date of this Proposal.

3. Addenda. The Respondent acknowledges its receipt of the following Addenda issued by or on behalf of OWNER and that the Proposal incorporates the matters addressed in each of the following Addenda. The Respondent further acknowledges that if the Respondent does not acknowledge receipt of all Addenda issued by or on behalf of OWNER and that this Proposal incorporates the matters raised by all Addenda, this Proposal may be rejected for non-responsiveness.

Addenda
Number
Addenda Received by Respondent
and incorporated into Proposal
 Yes  No
 Yes  No
 Yes  No
 Yes  No

4. Price Proposal. The Price for completion of Part 1 - Preconstruction Phase services for the Project will be the fixed Lump Sum Amount of Thirty thousand and no/100’s Dollars ($30,000.00) (“Preconstruction Services Contract Price”) for all Respondents to complete programming, schematic design, scheduling, Life Cycle costing and Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) pricing and related preconstruction activities of the Project.

5. Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services Fee Percentage (Profit & OH). The Respondent’s percentage proposed for the Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase services represents the Respondent’s proposed Design and Construction Services GMP Profit and Overhead fee. The intent is for the Profit and Overhead fee to cover the DBE’s overhead expenses and profit margin for design and construction. The definition of overhead expenses is all those expenses not readily chargeable to one particular project. They constitute the DBE’s cost of doing business and any fixed expenses that are paid by the any of the contractor’s personnel are not 100% charged to a project, those personnel should be considered in the DBE’s overhead expense. 358
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 17
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

6. Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services Scoring of General Conditions Lump Sum Total Fee.

Provide an estimate of Respondent’s General Conditions for the Project construction utilizing the Design-Build Pre-Construction Proposal Attachment to this DESIGN-BUILD COLLABORATIVE PRECONSTRUCTION PROPOSAL. General Conditions for the purposes of the estimate required under this Proposal shall be defined as Administrative and Field Direct Construction costs necessary to facilitate the overall prosecution of the Work, that are NOT otherwise attributable to a CSI Division of Work. Administrative General Conditions include, but are not necessarily limited to: project manager, estimator, principals, project engineers, bookkeeping, and administrative personnel. Field General Conditions include, but are not necessarily limited to: general labor, housekeeping, site management (Superintendent), safety measures, temporary utilities, trailers, etc. For parity between Respondent proposals, Insurance, Equipment Rental, SWPPP and Erosion Controls are General Condition items that shall be included in the Respondent’s General Condition estimate. For comparison purposes and parity, Respondents shall base their General Conditions estimate breakdown on the time duration for construction of 270 days and OWNER’s estimated design and construction of Project Construction Costs of $1.75 million. The failure of a Respondent to submit Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services Scoring of General Conditions Lump Sum Total Fee pricing in accordance with the instruction herein with its Proposal will result in rejection of the Proposal for non-responsiveness.

General Conditions Proposed Lump Sum Fee
Amount
Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Lump
Sum Total Fee $____________________

7. Proposal Exceptions/Exclusions. The Proposal incorporates all work, labor, materials and services required to complete the Work of the Contract Documents, except as noted below. The Respondent acknowledges that if OWNER determines in OWNER’s sole discretion that any of the exceptions/exclusions set forth below affect material terms of the Contract Documents and/or affect the nature, scope or other requirements of the Project, OWNER may reject this Proposal for nonresponsiveness. The exceptions/exclusions are: ________________________________.

8. Award of DBE Preconstruction Contract.

8.1. OWNER Actions. The Respondent acknowledges that action to award the DBE Preconstruction Contract is vested solely in the Board of Directors of OWNER and that OWNER may waive minor irregularities or informalities in the RFP process or OWNER may reject all Proposals.

8.2. Respondent Responsibilities. If the undersigned Respondent is awarded the DBE Preconstruction Contract, the Respondent shall execute and return the executed Agreement to OWNER within ten (10) calendar days of the date of the Board of Directors action awarding the DBE Preconstruction Contract to the Respondent. Concurrently with return of the executed DBE Preconstruction Contract the Respondent shall also submit: (i) Certificates of Insurance evidencing that the policies of insurance in the minimum coverage amounts set forth in the RFP and the DBE Preconstruction Contract have been obtained by the Respondent; (ii) duly Service Proposed Percentage
Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services Fee
Percentage (Profit & OH) Percentage (%)____________
359
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 18
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work executed and Bid Bond; (iii) duly completed and executed Certificate of Workers Compensation Insurance and (iv) duly completed and executed Drug-Free Workplace Certification.

9. Progress and Completion of the Work. Time of Essence. Time limits stated in the Contract Documents are of the essence. By executing the Agreement, the DBE confirms that the below listed Maximum Durations of Time represents a reasonable period in calendar days for performing and achieving each Phase of the Work provided. Respondents have the option of proposing a lower duration ceiling. Should Respondents propose a lower duration ceiling for any of the Phases listed, Respondents are required to attach a narrative to their Proposal providing justification on how the Respondent will achieve the lesser duration(s) proposed.

Phase OWNER Maximum Respondent Proposed
Duration Duration
Preconstruction: 60
Design/ Plan Approval: 104
Construction: 270
Total Final Project Duration 434
The DBE shall employ and supply a sufficient force of workers, material and equipment, and prosecute the Work with diligence so as to maintain progress, to prevent Work stoppage and to achieve Final Completion of the Work within the Contract Time.

10. Progress Payments. Applications for Progress Payments. During the DBE’s performance of the Preconstruction Services the DBE shall submit monthly, on the first working day of each month, to OWNER, Project Manager, Applications for Progress Payments, on forms approved or designated by OWNER, setting forth an itemized estimate of the value of the Work completed in the preceding month for the purpose of the OWNER’s making of Progress Payments thereon. Values utilized in the Applications for Progress Payments shall be based upon the OWNER’s accepted Cost Breakdown of the Preconstruction Services Contract Price and such values shall be only for determining the basis of Progress Payments to DBE, and shall not be considered as fixing a basis for adjustments, whether additive or deductive, to the Preconstruction Services Contract Price, or for determining the extent of Work actually completed. Additionally DBE shall submit reviews at 30%, 60% completion to allow the city time to determine project viability.

11. Conflicts of Interest. The undersigned will not enter into any contracts with other parties that conflict with the services being contracted for in this Agreement. The undersigned’s employees/consultants are not considered employees of The City of Oroville and acknowledges The City of Oroville assumes no liability for Worker’s Compensation or liability for loss, damage or injury to person(s) or property during or related to the performance of services under this Agreement.

The individual executing this Proposal on behalf of the above-identified Respondent warrants and represents to OWNER that: (i) he/she is duly authorized to execute this Proposal on behalf of the Respondent and to bind the Respondent to this Proposal; and (ii) this Proposal is complete and accurate.

By: __________________________
Title: _________________________
Date:
360
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 19
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

DESIGN-BUILD PRECONSTRUCTION PROPOSAL ATTACHMENT

DESIGN-BUILD CONSTRUCTION GENERAL CONDITION COST PROPOSAL

GENERAL CONDITIONS CALCULATIONS

CODE BID ITEM SUBTOTAL
100 PERMITS & FEES
110 ON-SITE SUPERVISION
120 PROJECT MANAGER
130 PROJECT ENGINEER
140 PROJECT LABOR (clean-up & other work not attributable to CSI Division) 150 FUEL
160 FUEL - P.Mgr./P.Egr./Etc.
170 SUBSISTENCE
180 CELLULAR - Superintendent
190 CELLULAR - P.Mgr./P.Egr./Etc.
200 TEMP PHONE - Hook Up
210 TEMP PHONE - Monthly
220 TEMP POWER - Hook Up
230 TEMP Power - Monthly
240 TEMP WATER METER
250 TEMP CONST. WATER
260 TEMP TOILETS
270 TEMP FENCING
280 TEMP LIGHTING
290 TEMP OFFICE - Move In/Out
300 TEMP OFFICE - Monthly
310 TEMP STORAGE UNIT- Move In/Out
320 TEMP STORAGE UNIT - Monthly
330 OFFICE SUPPLIES & EXPENSES
340 POSTAGE/UPS/OVERNIGHT
350 DWG. COPIES / REPRODUCTION
360 OFFICE WATER - Bottled
390 WASTE DISPOSAL
400 JOBSITE SECURITY
410 SCAFFOLDING
420 SAFETY
440 JANITORIAL / FINAL CLEAN-UP
450 CONSTRUCTION STAKING / SURVEY
460 TEMP WEATHER PROTECTION
470 DUST CONTROL / HOUSEKEEPING
480 INSURANCE
490 DEWATERING – PUMPS, HOSE, ETC.
510 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
520 SWPPP REQUIREMENTS
530 EROSION CONTROL
540
PROPOSED LUM SUM GENERAL CONDITIONS COSTS $
361
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 20
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

BID BOND
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that we, ________________________________, as Surety and ___________________________________, as Principal, are jointly and severally, along with their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, held and firmly bound unto The City of Oroville. (“the Obligee”) for payment of the penal sum hereof in lawful money of the United States, as more particularly set forth herein.

THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT:

WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted the accompanying Bid Proposal to the Obligee for the Work commonly described as City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work.

WHEREAS, subject to the terms of this Bond, the Surety and the Principal are jointly and severally firmly bound unto the Obligee in the penal sum equal to Ten Percent (10%) of the Obligee’s estimated Construction Costs of $1,750,000.00
NOW THEREFORE, if the Principal shall not withdraw said Bid Proposal within the period specified therein after the opening of the same, or, if no period be specified, for sixty (60) days after opening of said Bid Proposal; and if the Principal is awarded the Contract, and shall within the period specified therefore, or if no period be specified, within five (5) days after the prescribed forms are presented to him for signature, enter into a written contract with the Obligee, in accordance with the Bid Proposal as accepted and give such bond(s) with good and sufficient surety or sureties, as may be required, for the faithful performance and proper fulfillment of such Contract and for the payment for labor and materials used for the performance of the Contract, or in the event of the withdrawal of said Bid Proposal within the period specified for the holding open of the Bid Proposal or the failure of the Principal to enter into such Contract and give such bonds within the time specified, if the Principal shall pay the Obligee the difference between the amount specified in said Bid Proposal and the amount for which the Obligee may procure the required Work and/or supplies, if the latter amount be in excess of the former, together with all costs incurred by the Obligee in again calling for Bids, then the above obligation shall be void and of no effect, otherwise to remain in full force and effect.

Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Contract or the Call for Bids, the Work to be performed there under, the Drawings or the Specifications accompanying the same, or any other portion of the Contract Documents shall in no way affect its obligations under this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of said Contract, the Call for Bids, the Work, the Drawings or the Specifications, or any other portion of the Contract Documents.

In the event suit or other proceeding is brought upon this Bond by the Obligee, the Surety and Principal shall be jointly and severally liable for payment to the Obligee all costs, expenses and fees incurred by the Obligee in connection therewith, including without limitation, attorneys’ fees.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Principal and Surety have executed this instrument this ________ day of _______________, 20___ by their duly authorized agents or representatives. 362
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 21
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work _________________________________________________________ __
(Surety Name)
By: ___________________________________________________ (Signature of Attorney-In-Fact for Surety)
_________________________________________________
__
(Typed or Printed Name of Attorney-In-Fact)
(Attach: (i) Attorney-In-Fact Certification; (ii) Notary Public Acknowledgment of Authorizing Signature on Attorney-Fact Certification; and (iii) Notary Public Acknowledgement of AttorneyIn-Fact’s Signature) Contact name, address, telephone number and
email address for notices to the Surety
_________________________________________________________ _
(Contact Name)
_________________________________________________________ _
(Street Address)
_________________________________________________________ _
(City, State & Zip Code)
(______) _____________ (______) ______________
Telephone
Fax
____________________________________________
(Email address)
__________________________________________________________ _
(Bidder-Principal Name)
By: ___________________________________________________ (Signature)
__________________________________________________
_
(Typed or Printed Name)
Title:
__________________________________________________
(Attach Notary Public Acknowledgement of Principal’s Signature) 363
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 22
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

SUBCONTRACTORS LIST
Project: City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work Respondent: ________________________________________
Licensed
Subcontractor
Name
Subcontractor
Office, Mill or Shop
Address
Subcontractor
Trade or
Portion of Work
Subcontractor
Contractors’
License Number and
Classification(s)
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
License No._________
Classification(s)_________
[Duplicate and attached additional page(s) as required.] 364
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 23
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF _Butte___________________)
PROJECT: City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
I, ___________________________________, being first duly sworn, deposes and says that I (Typed or Printed Name)
am the ___________________________ of _____________________________________, the party (Title) (Bidder Name)
submitting the foregoing Proposal (“the Respondent”). In connection with the foregoing Proposal, the undersigned declares, states and certifies that:

The Proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization or corporation.

The Proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham.

The Respondent has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to put in a false or sham bid, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any other bidder or anyone else to put in sham bid, or to refrain from bidding.

The Respondent has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the bid price, or that of any other bidder, or to fix any overhead, profit or cost element of the bid price or that of any other bidder, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the contract or of anyone interested in the proposed contract.

All statements contained in the Proposal and related documents are true.

The Respondent has not, directly or indirectly, submitted the price Proposal or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative thereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any person, corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, bid depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham bid.

Executed this ____ day of ___________, 20__ at _________________________________. (City, County and State)
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
_______________________________________
Signature
_______________________________________
Name Printed or Typed
365
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 24
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

DBE CERTIFICATIONS
These DBE Certifications are submitted by the undersigned Respondent, ______________________ to The City of Oroville (“OWNER”) concurrently with the Proposal of the Respondent for the DBE Contract relating to the City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work (“PROJECT”). The Respondent acknowledges that: (i) OWNER will rely upon the matters disclosed and verified in these Certifications as part of OWNER’s review and evaluation of the Proposal for the DBE Contract; and (ii) that if OWNER reasonably determines that any of the following Certifications or the matters to which the Certifications verify are false, untrue, misleading or omit material facts rendering the Certification to be false or misleading, OWNER may reject the Respondent’s Proposal for non-responsiveness.

1. Project Team. By execution and submission of this Certification with the Respondent’s Proposal, the Respondent certifies to OWNER that if awarded the DBE Contract, the Respondent intends to complete its obligations under the DBE Contract with Project Team identified in its Pre-qualification Application. The Respondent acknowledges that if there are any substitutions to the Project Team that are not approved by OWNER, prior to the Respondent’s submission of its Proposal, the Proposal may be rejected by OWNER for nonresponsiveness.

2. Adequacy of Proposed Price. By execution and submission of this Certification with the Respondent’s Proposal, the Respondent certifies to OWNER that the Proposed Price set forth in the Respondent’s Proposal is sufficient and adequate for completing all of the Respondent’s obligations under the DBE Preconstruction Contract and that the allocation of the Proposed Lump Sum Price between the Part 1 – Preconstruction Phase Services and the Part 2 – DesignConstruct Phase Services, as set forth in the Respondent’s Proposal are sufficient and adequate for the scope thereof.

3. Skilled Labor Force Availability. By execution and submission of this Certification with the Respondent’s Proposal, the Respondent certifies to OWNER that the Respondent is a party to an agreement with a registered apprenticeship program, approved by the California Apprenticeship Council, which has graduated apprentices in each of the preceding five years (provided that this graduation requirement shall not apply to programs providing apprenticeship training for any craft that has been deemed by the Department of Labor and the Department of Industrial Relations to be an apprenticeable craft in the five years prior to 2009), and that attached hereto is a copy of that agreement, which is true and correct and in full force and effect.

4. Acceptable Safety Record. Please check one of the following:
_______The undersigned Respondent’s Workers Compensation Insurance experience modification rate for the most recent three-year period is an average of

1.00 or less.
_______The average Total Recordable Injury/Illness rate and average lost work rate of the Respondent for the most recent three-year period does not exceed the applicable statistical standards for its business category. _______The undersigned Respondent is a party to an alternative dispute resolution system pursuant to Labor Code § 3201.5.

5. Review and Acceptance of Bridging Documents. The Respondent certifies that: (i) the Respondent has thoroughly reviewed the Bridging Documents and obtained a complete understanding of the scope and other requirements of the Project; (ii) the Respondent has thoroughly reviewed the Site of the Project and obtained a complete understanding of the physical conditions of the Site and other limitations, constraints and other conditions which may affect the Project or the construction thereof; (iii) the Bridging Documents reflect and incorporate 366
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 25
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work physical conditions of the Site and other limitations, constraints or other conditions which may affect construction of the Project; and (iv) the Respondent accepts the Bridging Documents as being sufficiently complete and without errors or omissions so that the Respondent can complete development of OWNER’s programming and Bridging Documents with OWNER’s Design-Build Team to produce complete Design Documents which will be permitted by City of Oroville and which reflect the scope and other Project requirements established by the Respondent and OWNER for the Part 2 – Design-Construct Phase Services portion of the Project for the Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) developed in the Part 1 – Preconstruction Phase Services.

6. Pre-Qualification Application Certification. Please check one of the following:
_______ The Respondent certifies that all information it submitted to OWNER in connection with the Respondent’s Pre-Qualification Application, including without limitation information relating to the financial capacity and financial condition of the Respondent remains true and correct in all material respects as of the date of submitting its Proposal.
_______ Except as provided in the accompanying attachment entitled “Design-Build Entity Material Changes List” consisting of _______ pages, the Respondent certifies that all information it submitted to OWNER in connection with the Respondent’s PreQualification Application, including without limitation information relating to the financial capacity and financial condition of the Respondent remains true and correct in all material respects as of the date of submitting its Proposal.

I have reviewed each of the foregoing Certifications and know them to be true and correct of my own personal knowledge or I have made due and diligent inquiry of persons with knowledge of the foregoing and based upon such inquiry, each of the foregoing are true and correct. I am duly authorized by the Respondent to execute these Certifications on behalf of the Respondent. I declare under penalty of perjury under California law that the foregoing is true and correct.

By:______________________________________
(Signature)
_________________________________________
(Typed or printed name)
367
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 26
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE
PROJECT: Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work I, _____________________________ the ___________________________________ of (Name)
(Title)
________________________________________, declare, state and certify that:
(Contractor Name)

1. I am aware that California Labor Code §3700(a) and (b) provides:
“Every employer except the state shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:
(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation in one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this state. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self-insure either as an individual employer, or one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.”

2. I am aware that the provisions of California Labor Code §3700 require every employer to be insured against liability for workers’ compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of this Contract.

3. The following information pertains to the Workers Compensation Insurance policy:

Name of Insurer
Policy No.

Expiration Date
Name, Address,
Telephone, Fax and
Email Address of
contact for Insurer
or Broker
________________________________________
(Contractor Name)
By:______________________________________
(Signature)
_________________________________________
(Typed or printed name)
368
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 27
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION
I, __________________________________, am the __________________________ of (Print Name)
(Title)
____________________________________. I declare, state and certify to all of the following:
(Contractor Name).

1. I am aware of the provisions and requirements of California Government Code §§8350 et seq., the Drug Free Workplace Act of 1990.

2. I am authorized to certify, and do certify, on behalf of Contractor that a drug free workplace will be provided by Contractor by doing all of the following:

A. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in Contractor’s workplace and specifying actions which will be taken against employees for violation of the prohibition; B. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. Contractor’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; iii. The availability of drug counseling, rehabilitation and employee-assistance programs; and
iv. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations; C. Requiring that each employee engaged in the performance of the Contract be given a copy of the statement required by subdivision (A), above, and that as a condition of employment by Contractor in connection with the Work of the Contract, the employee agrees to abide by the terms of the statement.

D. Contractor agrees to fulfill and discharge all of Contractor’s obligations under the terms and requirements of California Government Code §8355 by, inter alia, publishing a statement notifying employees concerning: (a) the prohibition of any controlled substance in the workplace, (b) establishing a drug-free awareness program, and (c) requiring that each employee engaged in the performance of the Work of the Contract be given a copy of the statement required by California Government Code §8355(a) and requiring that the employee agree to abide by the terms of that statement.

3. Contractor and I understand that if City of Oroville determines that Contractor has either: (a) made a false certification herein, or (b) violated this certification by failing to carry out and to implement the requirements of California Government Code §§8355, the Contract awarded herein is subject to termination, suspension of payments, or both. Contractor and I further understand that, should Contractor violate the terms of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990, Contractor may be subject to debarment in accordance with the provisions of California Government Code §§8350, et seq.

4. Contractor and I acknowledge that Contractor and I are aware of the provisions of California Government Code §§8350, et seq. and hereby certify that Contractor and I will adhere to, fulfill, satisfy and discharge all provisions of and obligations under the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that all of the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at ____________________________________ this ____day of ________, 20____. (City and State)
________________________________________
(Signature)
________________________________________
(Handwritten or Typed Name)
369
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 28
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN-BUILD PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN-BUILD PRECONSTRUCTION SERVICES (“Agreement”) is made this ____ day of __________________, 20__, in the Community of Oroville, County of Butte, State of California, by The City of Oroville hereinafter “OWNER” and ___________________________ (“DBE”).

WITNESSETH, that OWNER and the DBE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein agree as follows:

1. The Work. Within the Contract Time and for the Contract Price, subject to adjustments thereto pursuant to the Contract Documents, the DBE shall perform and provide all necessary Preconstruction Period Services in the execution of all of the obligations of the DBE set forth in the Contract Documents in connection with the work of improvement commonly referred to as City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project (“Project”). DBE shall provide all services and complete all Work covered by the Contract Documents, including without limitation, completion of OWNER programming; 100% Schematic Design Documents for the Project; Construction Cost Estimates / GMP Submittals; Schedule reviews; Constructability reviews; Preconstruction Design Phase Investigative Work; and final submittal of a GMP that is “the maximum price that OWNER and the DBE agree upon as the payment for managing the remaining design development and construction, designing, providing and installing all the Work.” The GMP submitted is the Not-to-Exceed Contract Amount.

1.1. OWNER Programming. As an initial task, the DBE shall work collaboratively with OWNER’s Project Team to fully develop OWNER’s programming and criteria documents for the Project.

1.2. Schematic Design. Based upon the RFP Bridging Document’s and DBE and OWNER collaborative programming, DBE shall provide 100% Schematic drawing for the building floor plan; exterior elevation(s); and site plan.

1.3. Testing and Inspection. OWNER shall be responsible for providing any geotechnical testing necessary during the Part 1 – Preconstruction Phase Services. The DBE shall be responsible for all testing and inspections of the Project’s construction during the Part 2 – Design-Construct Phase Services.

1.4. Construction Cost Estimates / GMP Submittals. The DBE shall develop and submit cost breakdowns during Schematic design development as required to ensure programming and Schematic design criteria achieve OWNER’s Budgeted Direct Construction Cost portion of the GMP. OWNER may revise the project Budgeted Direct Construction Cost during the Part 1 – Preconstruction Period Services. The DBE Direct Construction Cost breakdown shall include a line item breakdown showing all Direct cost including, general conditions, contingency, allowances, project related indirect costs, overhead and profit. The GMP shall include all project cost to complete the design utilizing the 100% Schematic drawings and programing developed in Part 1 - Part 1 – Preconstruction Phase Services under this contract; Direct Construction; and permitting including permitting related “soft costs” (fees), special testing, and project closeout and commissioning as required to provide “turnkey” design and construction of the Project. OWNER shall provide Builder’s Course of Construction insurance.

1.5. Schedule Review. The DBE shall develop and review the proposed project schedule meeting OWNER’s scheduling goals and objective, and notify OWNER of potential schedule risk. If warranted, DBE shall recommend modifications to the schedule that would expedite the Project Schedule.

1.6. Constructability Review. The DBE shall assure the programming and 100% Schematic drawings are complete, OWNER, unambiguous, and of quality needed for developing realistic “Cost Model” for GMP pricing.

1.7. Preconstruction Design Phase Investigative Work. It shall be the responsibility of the DBE to access the type, quantity, and quality of the available information describing the existing site 370
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 29
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work conditions and related contract documents. The DBE shall make recommendations to OWNER regarding supplemental site surveys if added information is needed to make associated Project scopes fully biddable for GMP pricing / cost estimating.

1.8. Final GMP Submittal. The GMP shall be submitted with a detail breakdown of the total. The GMP is the maximum amount OWNER will pay the DBE for completion of the design and construction of the project except as may be adjusted by OWNER change orders. DBE shall be responsible for any cost overruns of the GMP. If the DBE’s Direct Construction Cost portion of the GMP contracted is less than the Direct Construction Cost portion of the GMP, OWNER shall retain the difference.

1.9. Failure to Agree on GMP. If OWNER and DBE cannot agree on a GMP, then OWNER may terminate the Part 1 – Preconstruction Phase Services agreement. The Part 2- Part 2 – DesignConstruct Phase Services will not be awarded to the DBE.

2. Contract Time. The Contract Time for the DBE to achieve Part 1 – Preconstruction Phase Services Final of the Project is sixty (60) calendar days from the Contract Time Commencement Date established in the Notice to Proceed issued by or on behalf of OWNER to the DBE.

3. Contract Price. The Contract Price consists of the Preconstruction Phase Services. The Preconstruction Phase Services Contract Price is the fixed price Lump Sum of Thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) (“Preconstruction Services Contract Price”).

4. Design-Construct Phase Services Profit and Overhead Percentage. The Design-Construct Phase Services Contract Construction Services GMP Percentage is a percentage for the Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Construction Services the DBE will allocate for Construction Services GMP Profit and Overhead fee. The Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services Fee Percentage for Profit and Overhead is

5. Design-Construct Phase Services General Conditions Lump Sum Total Fee. The DesignConstruct Phase Services Contract Construction Services General Conditions Lump Sum Fee is the fixed price of

6. Insurance Policies Coverages. The DBE shall obtain and maintain policies of insurance conforming to the requirements set forth in the Contract Documents and in the minimum coverage amount for each such policy of insurance, as set forth below.

6.1. DBE Professional Liability Insurance. The minimum coverage limit for the DBE’s Architect of Record (AOR) Professional Liability insurance policy is One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate.

6.2. DBE Insurance Minimum Coverage Limits. The DBE shall obtain and maintain the following minimum coverage limits for the following policies of insurance:

6.2.1. Workers Compensation Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the Workers Compensation Insurance policy shall be in accordance with the Laws.

6.2.2. Employers Liability Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the Employers Liability insurance policy shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).

6.2.3. Commercial General Liability Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the Commercial General Liability insurance policy shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000).

6.2.4. Contractor Pollution Liability Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the DBE’s Contractor Pollution Liability insurance shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate.

7. Notices. Notices from the DBE and OWNER to the other shall be addressed as follows:
eleven and a half percent (11.5%). fifty three thousand one hundred eighty eight dollars ($53,188.00). 371
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 30
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work If to OWNER
If to the DBE:
________________________
________________________
________________________

8. The Contract Documents. The documents forming a part of the Contract Documents consist of this Agreement and the following, all of which are component parts of the Contract Documents.

8.1. RFP Response Instructions

8.2. DB Collaborative Preconstruction Proposal

8.3. Subcontractor’s List

8.4. Non-Collusion Affidavit

8.5. Certification of Workers Compensation Insurance

8.6. Drug-Free Workplace Certification

8.7. DBE Certification

8.8. DBE Agreement for Design-Build Preconstruction Services

8.9. DBE Agreement for Design-Build Construction Services

8.10. General Conditions (GMP Contract)

8.11. Bid Bond

8.12. Pre-Qualification Application

8.13. Attachment A – General Conceptualized Scope

12. Authority to Execute. The individual(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of the DBE is/are duly and fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of DBE and to bind the DBE to each and every term, condition and covenant of the Contract Documents.

CONTRACTORS ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE LICENSED AND REGULATED BY THE CONTRACTORS’ STATE LICENSE BOARD. ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING A CONTRACTOR MAY BE REFERRED TO THE REGISTRAR, CONTRACTORS’ STATE LICENSE BOARD, P.O.

BOX 2600, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95826
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed by OWNER and the DBE as of the date set forth above.
“OWNER”
The City of Oroville
By:_________________________________
Title:________________________________
“DBE”
[DBE NAME]
By:_________________________________
Title:_______________________________
275 Fairchild Ave, Suite 106 Chico CA 95973 United Building Contractors City of Oroville
Attention Tim Kaber
1735 Montgomery St
Oroville CA 95965
372
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 31
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN-BUILD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT FOR DESIGN-BUILD CONSTRUCTION SERVICES (“Agreement”) is made this ____ day of _______________, 20___, in the Community of Oroville, County of Butte, State of California, by and between The City of Oroville, “OWNER” and ___________________ (“DBE”).

WITNESSETH, that OWNER and the DBE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein agree as follows:

1. The Work. Within the Contract Time and for the Contract Price, subject to adjustments thereto pursuant to the Contract Documents, the DBE shall perform and provide all necessary labor, materials, tools, equipment, utilities, services and transportation to complete in a workmanlike manner all of the obligations of the DBE set forth in the Contract Documents in connection with the work of improvement commonly referred to as the City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project (“Project”). DBE shall provide all services and complete all Work covered by the Contract Documents, including without limitation, completion of Design Documents for the Project, obtaining City of Oroville approval/permit for construction of the Project and Project construction.

2. Contract Time. The Contract Time for the DBE to achieve Final Completion of the Project is Four Hundred thirty-four (434) calendar days from the Contract Time Commencement Date established in the Notice to Proceed issued by or on behalf of the OWNER to the DBE to proceed with the Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services. The DBE acknowledges and agrees that the DBE shall be subject to Liquidated Damages set forth in the Contract Documents if the DBE fails or refuses, for any reason, to achieve Project Final Completion within the Contract Time.

3. Contract Price. The Contract Price consists of the following separate components: (i) Preconstruction Services and (ii) Construction Services. The Preconstruction Services Contract Price is the fixed price lump sum of Thirty thousand Dollars ($30,000) (“Design-Build Preconstruction Services Contract Price”). The Construction Services Contract Price is a Guaranteed Maximum Price of _________________________________ Dollars ($_______________).

4. Insurance Policies Coverages. The DBE shall obtain and maintain policies of insurance conforming to the requirements set forth in the Contract Documents and in the minimum coverage amount for each such policy of insurance, as set forth below.

5.1 DBE Professional Liability Insurance. The minimum coverage limit for the DBE’s Professional Liability insurance policy is One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate.

5.2 DBE and Subcontractor Insurance Minimum Coverage Limits. The DBE and all Subcontractors shall obtain and maintain the following minimum coverage limits for the following policies of insurance:

5.2.1. Workers Compensation Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the Workers Compensation Insurance policy shall be in accordance with the Laws.

5.2.2. Employers Liability Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the Employers Liability insurance policy shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).

5.2.3. Commercial General Liability Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the Commercial General Liability insurance policy shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000).
373
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 32
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

5.2.4. Contractor Pollution Liability Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the DBE’s Contractor Pollution Liability insurance shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate.

6. Mark-Up On Direct Costs of Changes. The allowable mark-up for general administrative and overhead costs, supervision, bond/insurance premium charges on the direct costs of a Change shall be ten percent (10%).

7. Hours and Days of Work at the Site. The DBE’s construction activities at the Site shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Mondays through Fridays, except for OWNER holiday days.

8. Notices. Notices from the DBE and OWNER to the other shall be addressed as follows:

If to OWNER
If to the DBE:
________________________
________________________
________________________
________________________

9. The Contract Documents. The documents forming a part of the Contract Documents consist of this Agreement and the following, all of which are component parts of the Contract Documents.

9.1. RFP Response Instructions

9.2. DB Collaborative Preconstruction Proposal

9.3. Subcontractor’s List

9.4. Non-Collusion Affidavit

9.5. Certification of Workers Compensation Insurance

9.6. Drug-Free Workplace Certification

9.7. DBE Certification

9.8. DBE Agreement for Design-Build Preconstruction Services

9.9. DBE Agreement for Design-Build Construction Services

9.10. Agreement for Design-Build Services General Conditions

9.11. Pre-Qualification Application

9.12. Liquidated Damages

9.13. Attachment A – General Conceptualized Scope

9.14. DBE Schematic drawings

9.15. DBE GMP Cost Breakdown

9.16. DBE Project Schedule

13. Authority to Execute. The individual(s) executing this Agreement on behalf of the DBE is/are duly and fully authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of DBE and to bind the DBE to each and every term, condition and covenant of the Contract Documents.

City of Oroville
Attention Tim Kaber
1735 Montgomery St
Oroville CA 95965
374
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 33
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

BOX 2600, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95826
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed by OWNER and the DBE as of the date set forth above.
“OWNER”
The City of Oroville
By:
__________________________________
Title:
_________________________________
“DBE”
[DBE NAME]
By:
__________________________________
Title:
_________________________________
375
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 34 Design-Build RFP

DESIGN-BUILD SERVICES PRE-QUALIFICATION APPLICATION

1. DESIGN-BUILD ENTITY (“DBE”)

1.1. DBE. Complete the following for the DBE (the firm or entity who will enter into the Design-Build Preconstruction Contract with OWNER for completing Project design and construction.) DBE Name
_________________________________________
DBE Office Address
_________________________________________
(Street Address)
_________________________________________
(City, State and Zip Code)
DBE Mailing Address (if different from
mailing address) _________________________________________ (Street Address)
_________________________________________
(City, State and Zip Code)
DBE Telephone/Fax (____) ______________ (____) ______________ (Telephone) (Fax)
DBE Contractors’ License ___________ ____________ ______________ (License Number) (Classification(s) (Expiration
Date)
DBE EIN, DUNS or SSN _____________________________

1.2. DBE Contact Information. Complete the following for the DBE contact person for RFP communications.

DBE Contact Person Name
_________________________________________
DBE Contact Person Address
_________________________________________
(Street Address)
_________________________________________
(City, State and Zip Code)
DBE Contact Person Telephone/Cell
Phone (____) ______________ (____) ______________
(Telephone) (Cell Phone)
DBE Contact Person Email
__________________________________
(Email Address)

1.3. DBE Form of Entity. Check appropriate box describing DBE form of entity.  Corporation _________________________________________________ (State of Incorporation & Corporate Registration No.)
 Partnership _________________________________________________ (Describe type of partnership i.e., general partnership, limited partnership)  Limited Liability Company  Limited Liability Partnership  Joint Venture ________________________________________________ (Identify each member of Joint Venture and form of entity of each Joint Venturer)  Sole Proprietorship _____________________________________________ (Identify all equity owners)
376
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 35 Design-Build RFP

1.4. DBE Members. Complete the following for the general contractor and Architect of Record (“AOR”) members of the DBE.

1.4.1. General Contractor. Complete the following for the general contractor member of DBE.

General Contractor Name
_____________________________________
General Contractor Mailing
Address _____________________________________
(Street Address)
______________________________________
(City, State and Zip Code)
General Contractor
Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________
(Telephone) (Fax)
General Contractor
Contractors’ License
___________ _________ ___________
(License Number) (Classification(s)
(Expiration Date)
General Contractor DIR
Contractor Registration
______________
(Registration Number)

1.4.2. AOR. Complete the following for the AOR member of the DBE.

AOR Name
______________________________________
AOR Mailing Address
______________________________________
(Street Address)
______________________________________
(City, State and Zip Code)
AOR Telephone/Fax (___) _____________ (___) ______________ (Telephone) (Fax)

1.4.3. AOR Licensed Personnel. Complete the following for personnel of the AOR.

AOR Project Executive
_____________________________________
Name
_____________________________________
(California Architect or Engineer License Number)
AOR Project Manager
______________________________________
Name
______________________________________
(California Architect or Engineer License Number)
AOR Design Phase Manager
______________________________________
Name
______________________________________
(California Architect or Engineer License Number)
AOR Construction Phase
Manager ______________________________________
Name
(California Architect or Engineer License Number)
377
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 36 Design-Build RFP

2. DBE PROPOSED PROJECT TEAM

2.1. Proposed Design Professionals. Complete the following for the proposed design professional members of the DBE listed.

2.1.1. Civil Engineer. Complete the following for the proposed civil engineer.

Civil Engineer Firm Name
_____________________________________
Civil Engineer Mailing
Address _____________________________________
(Street Address)
______________________________________
(City, State and Zip Code)
Civil Engineer Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________ (Telephone) (Fax)
Civil Engineer Project
Executive ______________________________________
Name
______________________________________
(California Architect or Engineer License Number)
Civil Engineer Project
Manager ______________________________________
Name
______________________________________
(California Architect or Engineer License Number)
Civil Engineer Design Phase
Manager ______________________________________
Name
______________________________________
(California Architect or Engineer License Number)
Civil Engineer Construction
Phase Manager ______________________________________
Name
______________________________________
(California Architect or Engineer License Number)

2.2. Proposed Trade Contractors. Complete the following for proposed trade contractors for the Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services of a portion of the Project. Trade Contractors identified by the DBE in the following is for information only. DBE will be required to submit a Subcontractors List for all subcontractors to the DBE that will be performing work valued at or more than one-half of one percent (0.05%) of the Construction Costs portion of the Contract Price under the DBE Part 2 GMP Contract.

OWNER reserves the right to require that the proposed trade contractors for: (i) structural; (ii) earthwork/civil work; (iii) electrical (line voltage and low voltage); (iv) mechanical; (v) plumbing; (vi) fire protection and (vii) roofing be pre-qualified in the RFP Part 2 - Design-Construct Phase Services phase.

2.2.1. Structural; Concrete.
378
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 37 Design-Build RFP
Contractor Name
_____________________________________
Contractor Mailing Address
_____________________________________
(Street Address)
______________________________________
(City, State and Zip Code)
Contractor Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________ (Telephone) (Fax)
Contractors’ License ___________ _________ ___________
(License Number) (Classification(s)
(Expiration Date)
DIR Contractor Registration ______________
(Registration Number)
Has the subcontractor’s
RMO/RME been changed in
the past five (5) years?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME
changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.

In the past ten (10) years,
have any complaints been
filed with the CSLB against
the subcontractor’s
contractors’ license?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such complaints in an
attachment.

In the past ten (10) years, has
the subcontractor’s license
been subject to any
disciplinary action imposed by
the CSLB?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such complaints in an
attachment.

2.2.2. Structural; Steel.

Contractor Name
_____________________________________
Contractor Mailing Address
_____________________________________
(Street Address)
______________________________________
(City, State and Zip Code)
Contractor Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________ (Telephone) (Fax)
Contractors’ License ___________ _________ ___________
(License Number) (Classification(s)
(Expiration Date)
DIR Contractor Registration ______________
(Registration Number)
Has the subcontractor’s
RMO/RME been changed in
the past five (5) years?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME
changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.
379
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 38 Design-Build RFP
In the past ten (10) years,
have any complaints been
filed with the CSLB against
the subcontractor’s
contractors’ license?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such complaints in an
attachment.

2.2.3. Concrete; Non-Structural.

Contractor Name
_____________________________________
Contractor Mailing Address
_____________________________________
(Street Address)
______________________________________
(City, State and Zip Code)
Contractor Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________ (Telephone) (Fax)
Contractors’ License ___________ _________ ___________
(License Number) (Classification(s)
(Expiration Date)
Has the subcontractor’s
RMO/RME been changed in
the past five (5) years?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME
changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.

2.2.4. Earthwork.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 39 Design-Build RFP
Contractors’ License ___________ _________ ___________
(License Number) (Classification(s)
(Expiration Date)
DIR Contractor Registration ______________
(Registration Number)
Has the subcontractor’s
RMO/RME been changed in
the past five (5) years?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME
changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.

2.2.5. Mechanical.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 40 Design-Build RFP

2.2.6. Electrical; Line Voltage.

2.2.7. Electrical; Low Voltage.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 41 Design-Build RFP
changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.

2.2.8. Plumbing.

2.2.9. Fire Protection.

Contractor Name
_____________________________________
Contractor Mailing Address
_____________________________________
(Street Address)
______________________________________
383
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 42 Design-Build RFP
(City, State and Zip Code)
Contractor Telephone/Fax (____) ____________ (____) ____________ (Telephone) (Fax)
Contractors’ License ___________ _________ ___________
(License Number) (Classification(s)
(Expiration Date)
DIR Contractor Registration ______________
(Registration Number)
Has the subcontractor’s
RMO/RME been changed in
the past five (5) years?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME
changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.

2.2.10. Roofing.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 43 Design-Build RFP
In the past ten (10) years, has
the subcontractor’s license
been subject to any
disciplinary action imposed by
the CSLB?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such complaints in an
attachment.

3. DBE Design-Build Experience. Provide a summary of the DBE Respondent’s General Contractor’s and Architect’s prior design-build experience within the past five (10) years. Clearly identify the relevance of each project to the proposed Project. Design-Build experience summaries must be provided using the following format. Respondents must duplicate the following form of project summary and attached completed project summaries to this Pre-Qualification Application; number each project summary sequentially, beginning with Assignment No. 1.

ASSIGNMENT NO. XXX
Contractor or AOR Name
Project Owner Name
Project Owner Type  Public
 Private Sector
Project Type  Capital Improvement
 Renovation/Modernization
 Deferred/Scheduled Maintenance
 Building Systems/Equipment Upgrades/Repairs
Project Description
Delivery Method
Approximate Project Value
Dollars ($ )
Project Owner Contact
Information Name: __________________________________
Title: __________________________________
Phone (____) ____________________________
Email __________________________________
DBE Team Members Contractor: _____________________________ AOR: _____________________________

4. Respondent Questionnaire. Each Respondent must answer the following questionnaire.

4.1. Years In Business. How many years has the Respondent provided construction, architectural or design professional services under Respondent’s current trade/business name? ____________

4.2. Prior Trade/Business Name. Has the Respondent, in the prior ten (10) years conducted business under a trade name or business name that is different than the Respondent’s current trade/business name?  Yes
 No
If “Yes” identify all trade/business names used by Respondent in the prior ten (10) years:
___________________________________________________________.

4.3. Bankruptcy. Within the past ten (10) years has the Respondent or a predecessor to Respondent filed any bankruptcy proceeding?
 Yes
 No
385
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 44 Design-Build RFP
If “Yes” please attach a copy of the bankruptcy petition, showing the case number and the date on which the petition was filed, and a copy of the Bankruptcy Court’s discharge order.

4.4. Respondent Ownership Changes. Within the past five (5) years, has there been a change in equity ownership of Respondent that cumulatively equals or exceeds ten percent (10%)?  Yes
 No
If “Yes” please describe in detail all such equity changes in a separate attachment.

4.5. Respondent Contractors’ License and Bonding Capacity. Is the Respondent a California licensed contractor?
 Yes (Respondent must respond to Questions 4.5.1 - 4.5.5)  No (Proceed to Question 4.6)

4.5.1. Current RMO/RME: ______________________________________

4.5.2. Has the RMO/RME been changed in the past five (5) years?  Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.

4.5.3. In the past ten (10) years, have any complaints been filed with the California State Contractors License Board (“CSLB”) against the Respondent’s contractors’ license?  Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such complaints in an attachment.

4.5.4. In the past ten (10) years, has the Respondent’s contractors’ license been subject to any disciplinary action imposed by the CSLB?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such complaints in an attachment.

4.5.5. If the Respondent provides construction services, complete the following for the Respondent’s Surety:

Surety Name
______________________________________________
Surety Broker Broker Firm Name: ______________________________ Contact Person:______________________________
Phone (___) _________________________
Email ______________________________
Current Maximum
Bonding Capacity _______________________________ Dollars ($________) Maximum Bonding
Capacity Per Project _______________________________ Dollars ($________)

4.6. Architectural Services. Does the Respondent employ California licensed architects or engineers and provide architect/design professional services?
 Yes (Respondent must respond to Questions 4.6.1 – 4.6.4)  No (Proceed to Question 4.7)
386
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 45 Design-Build RFP

4.6.1. Respondent Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has the Respondent or Respondent’s predecessor(s) reported to the California Architects Board (“Board”) any civil action judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award against the Respondent or Respondent’s predecessor in any action alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness in the practice of architecture where the judgment, settlement, or arbitration award was five thousand dollars ($5,000) or greater, as required by California Business & Professions Code §5588(a)?  Yes
 No
If “Yes” on a separate attachment, provide details of: (i) the title of the matter; (ii) the court or agency name; (iii) docket number; (iv) the claim or file number; (v) date on which the reportable event occurred; (vi) judgment, settlement or arbitration award.

4.6.2. Professional Liability Insurer Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has any professional liability insurer for the Respondent reported to the California Architects Board (“Board”) payment by the professional liability insurer of any civil action judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award against the Respondent or Respondent’s predecessor in any action alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness in the practice of architecture where the judgment, settlement, or arbitration award was five thousand dollars ($5,000) or greater, as required by California Business & Professions Code §5588.1?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” on a separate attachment, provide details of: (i) amount of judgment, settlement or arbitration award; and (ii) amount paid by professional liability insurer.

4.6.3. Pending Professional Liability Claims and Disputes. The Respondent is presently engaged in a claim, dispute or disagreement which asserts the professional negligence or professional liability of Respondent or any Design Consultant to Respondent in connection with architectural or design professional services provided by or through Respondent for any public or private work of improvement.
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” provide details, including without limitation: (i) the title of the matter; (ii) the court or agency name; (iii) docket number; (iv) the claim or file number; (v) amount in controversy; (vi) contact information (name, address, phone and email address) for each party pursing a pending claim against the Respondent.

4.6.4. Pending Payment Claims and Disputes. The Respondent is presently engaged in a claim, dispute or other disagreement relating to or arising out of a private or public contract for architectural services in which the Respondent is seeking additional compensation.  Yes
 No
If “Yes” on a separate attachment, provide details of each such pending claim, dispute or other disagreement.

4.7. General Contractor Questionnaire. If the Respondent is not a California licensed general contractor and will contract with a general contractor for construction of the Project, the Respondent must respond to Questions 4.7.1 – 4.7.7. If the Respondent is a general contractor and has responded to Questions 4.5.1 – 4.5.5, no responses are required for Questions 4.7.1 – 4.7.7

4.7.1. Name of proposed general contractor: _______________________________________

4.7.2. Contractors’ License Information:

4.7.2.1. Contractors’ License Number: _________________

4.7.2.2. Contractors’ License Expiration Date: ________________

4.7.2.3. Contractors’ License Classification(s): ________________ 387
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 46 Design-Build RFP

4.7.3. Current RMO/RME: ______________________________________

4.7.4. Has the general contractor’s RMO/RME been changed in the past five (5) years?  Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such RMO/RME changes in the past five (5) years in an attachment.

4.7.5. In the past ten (10) years, have any complaints been filed with the California State Contractors License Board (“CSLB”) against the general contractor’s contractors’ license?  Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such complaints in an attachment.

4.7.6. In the past ten (10) years, has the general contractors’ license been subject to any disciplinary action imposed by the CSLB?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” describe and detail all such complaints in an attachment.

4.7.7. Complete the following for the general contractor’s Surety:

4.8. AOR Questionnaire. If the Respondent is not the proposed AOR for the Project and the Respondent will contract with an architectural services firm to serve as the AOR for the Project, the Respondent must respond to Questions 4.8.1 – 4.8.5. If the Respondent is the AOR for the Project and has responded to Questions 4.6.1 - 4.6.4, responses to Questions 4.8.1 – 4.8.5 are not required.

4.8.1. Name of Proposed AOR. __________________________________________

4.8.2. AOR Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has the AOR or AOR’s predecessor(s) reported to the California Architects Board (“Board”) any civil action judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award against the AOR or AOR’s predecessor in any action alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness in the practice of architecture where the judgment, settlement, or arbitration award was five thousand dollars ($5,000) or greater, as required by California Business & Professions Code §5588(a)?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” on a separate attachment, provide details of: (i) the title of the matter; (ii) the court or agency name; (iii) docket number; (iv) the claim or file number; (v) date on which the reportable event occurred; (vi) judgment, settlement or arbitration award.

4.8.3. Professional Liability Insurer Reported Claims. Within the past ten (10) years, has any professional liability insurer for the AOR reported to the California Architects Board (“Board”) payment by the professional liability insurer of any civil action judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action resulting in a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award against the AOR or 388
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 47 Design-Build RFP
AOR’s predecessor in any action alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness in the practice of architecture where the judgment, settlement, or arbitration award was five thousand dollars ($5,000) or greater, as required by California Business & Professions Code §5588.1?
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” on a separate attachment, provide details of: (i) amount of judgment, settlement or arbitration award; and (ii) amount paid by professional liability insurer.

4.8.4. Pending Professional Liability Claims and Disputes. The AOR is presently engaged in a claim, dispute or disagreement which asserts the professional negligence or professional liability of AOR or any Design Consultant to the AOR in connection with architectural or design professional services provided by or through the AOR for any public or private work of improvement.  Yes
 No
If “Yes” provide details, including without limitation: (i) the title of the matter; (ii) the court or agency name; (iii) docket number; (iv) the claim or file number; (v) amount in controversy; (vi) contact information (name, address, phone and email address) for each party pursing a pending claim against the Respondent.

4.8.5. Pending Payment Claims and Disputes. The AOR is presently engaged in a claim, dispute or other disagreement relating to or arising out of a private or public contract for architectural services in which the AOR is seeking additional compensation.
 Yes
 No
If “Yes” on a separate attachment, provide details of each such pending claim, dispute or other disagreement.

5. Essential Minimum Qualifications. Any response of a Respondent indicating “not qualified” to the following minimum qualifications criteria will result in rejection of the Respondent’s RFP Response for failure to meet minimum qualifications criteria.

5.1. Respondent has a current Commercial General Liability policy of insurance with coverage limits of at least Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence and Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) in the aggregate.
 Yes
 No (not qualified)

5.2. If the Respondent will not serve as the general contractor for construction of the Project does the proposed general contractor currently have a Commercial General Liability policy of insurance with coverage limits of at least Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence and Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) in the aggregate?
 Not Applicable, Respondent will serve as the project general contractor  Yes
 No (not qualified)

5.3. Does each proposed subcontractor currently have a Commercial General Liability policy of insurance with coverage limits of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate?
 Yes
 No (not qualified)

5.4. Respondent or the Respondent’s AOR has a current professional liability policy of insurance with coverage limits of at least Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) per claim and Four Millions Dollars ($4,000,000) in the aggregate.
 Yes
 No (not qualified)

5.5. Does each proposed Design Consultants have a current professional liability policy of insurance with 389
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 48 Design-Build RFP
coverage limits of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in the aggregate?
 Yes
 No (not qualified)

5.6. Respondent has obtained a current Workers Compensation policy of insurance with coverage limits in accordance with applicable law.
 Yes
 No (not qualified)

5.7. Every proposed Design Consultant has obtained a current Workers Compensation policy of insurance with coverage limits in accordance with applicable law.  Yes
 No (not qualified)

5.8. Every proposed subcontractor has obtained a current Workers Compensation policy of insurance with coverage limits in accordance with applicable law.
 Yes
 No (not qualified)

5.9. Respondent is ineligible for award of public works contracts pursuant to Labor Code §1777.1 or 1777.7.  Yes (not qualified)
 No

5.10. If the Respondent will not serve as the general contractor for construction of the Project, is the proposed general contractor ineligible for award of public works contracts pursuant to Labor Code §1777.1 or 1777.7.
 Not Applicable, Respondent will serve as the project general contractor  Yes (not qualified)
 No

5.11. Has any public agency, within the past ten (10) years conducted proceedings that resulted in a finding that the Respondent or any predecessor to the Respondent is not a “responsible” bidder for a public works project or a public works contract?
 Yes (not qualified)
 No

5.12. If the Respondent will not serve as the general contractor for construction of the Project, has any public agency, within the past ten (10) years conducted proceedings that resulted in a finding that the proposed general contractor or any predecessor to the proposed general contractor is not a “responsible” bidder for a public works project or a public works contract?
 Not Applicable, Respondent will serve as the project general contractor  Yes (not qualified)
 No

5.13. At any time during the last ten (10) years, has Respondent or any predecessor to the Respondent been convicted of a crime involving any federal, state, or local law related to a private or public construction project?
 Yes (not qualified)
 No

5.14. At any time during the last ten (10) years, has the Respondent or any predecessor to the Respondent been convicted of a federal or state crime involving fraud, theft, or any other act of dishonesty?  Yes (not qualified)
 No

5.15. Within the past ten (10) years, one or more contract(s) to provide work, labor, materials or services to which the Respondent was a party to have been terminated for default of the Respondent. 390
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 49 Design-Build RFP
 Yes (not qualified)
 No

5.16. If the Respondent will not serve as the general contractor for construction of the Project, within the past ten (10) years, have one or more contract(s) to provide work, labor, materials or services to which the proposed general contractor was a party to have been terminated for default of the proposed general contractor?
 Not Applicable, Respondent will serve as the project general contractor  Yes (not qualified)
 No

6. Questionnaire. Respondents must answer each of the following questions. Where a response requires additional details, provide details in a separate attachment to this Pre-Qualification Application.

6.1. At any time in the last ten (10) years has the Respondent or the proposed general contractor been assessed liquidated damages of more than $25,000 on a construction contract with either a public or private owner?
 Yes
 No
If yes, identify all such projects by owner, owner’s address, name of entity against whom assessment was made, the date of completion of the project, amount of liquidated damages assessed and all other information necessary to fully explain the assessment of liquidated damages.

6.2. Has the Respondent or the proposed general contractor ever been declared in default on a construction contract?
 Yes
 No
If yes, identify all such projects by owner, owner’s address. Provide details of each default declaration.

6.3. In the past ten (10) years has any claim in excess of $50,000 been filed in a judicial proceeding (litigation) or in an arbitration proceeding against the Respondent or the proposed general contractor concerning a construction project?
 Yes
 No
If yes, identify all such projects by owner, owner’s address. Provide details of each such claim, including the disposition thereof.

6.4. In the past ten (10) years has the Respondent or proposed general contractor asserted a claim in excess of $50,000 in a judicial proceeding (litigation) or in an arbitration proceeding against a project owner?  Yes
 No
If yes, identify all such projects by owner, owner’s address. Provide details of each such claim, including the disposition thereof.

6.5. In the last ten (10) years has any insurer, for any policy of insurance, refused or declined to renew the insurance policy for the Respondent or the proposed general contractor?  Yes
 No
If yes, describe each such insurance policy and the reason(s) for the insurer’s refusal to renew the policy of insurance.

6.6. Has the Respondent or proposed general contractor ever been found liable in a civil suit or found guilty in a criminal action for making any false claim or material misrepresentation to any public entity?  Yes
 No
If yes, provide details of each such instance, including identification of the public entity, nature of 391
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 50 Design-Build RFP
the false claim or material misrepresentation and the penalty imposed.

6.7. Has the Respondent or the proposed general contractor been cited by CAL OSHA for any “serious,” “willful” or “repeat” violations in the past ten (10) years?  Yes
 No
If “yes,” on separate page describe the citations, the party against whom the citation was made, date of citation, nature of the violation, project on which the citation was issued, project owner, and the amount of penalty paid, if any. State the case number and date of any OSHAB decision.

6.8. Provide the Experience Modification Rating (EMR) for the Respondent or the proposed general contractor for the past three (3) premium years:

Policy Year EMR
2023-2024
2022-2023
2021-2022

6.9. Has the Respondent or the proposed general contractor been subject to payment of back wages or penalties for failure to comply with the prevailing wage requirements within the past five (5) years?  Yes
 No
If “yes,” attach a separate page, describing the violation, nature of each violation, name of the project, date of its completion, the project owner and a description of the back wages and/or penalty assessment.

6.10. At any time during the last five (5) years, has the Respondent or proposed general contractor or its associates been found to have violated any provision of California apprenticeship laws or regulations, or the laws pertaining to use of apprentices on public works?  Yes
 No
If “yes,” provide the date of the findings and attach a copy of the final decision.

6.11. Do agreements exist between the Respondent or the proposed general contractor and registered apprenticeship programs which have been approved by the California Apprenticeship Council and have graduated apprentices in the preceding ten (10) years, for all apprenticable crafts which may be employed by the Respondent or proposed general contractor on the project? (This graduation requirement does not apply to programs providing apprenticeship training for any craft that has not been deemed by the Department of Labor and the Department of Industrial Relations to be an apprenticable craft within the period of October, 1999 to October, 2001.)  Yes
 No

6.12. In the last ten (10) years has any insurer, for any policy of insurance, refused or declined to renew an insurance policy for the AOR, based on non-payment or losses?  Yes
 No
If yes, describe each such insurance policy and the reason(s) for the insurer’s refusal to renew the policy of insurance.

6.13. How many design-build projects has the Respondent completed with the AOR proposed for the Project? ____________________
On a separate attachment, provide details of each design-build project completed by the Respondent and the proposed AOR.
392
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work P a g e | 51 Design-Build RFP

7. Certification and Verification.

The undersigned is duly authorized to execute this Pre-Qualification Application under penalty of perjury on behalf of the above-identified Respondent. The undersigned warrants and represents that he/she has personal knowledge of each of the responses to this Pre-Qualification Application and/or that he/she has conducted all necessary and appropriate inquiries to determine the truth, completeness and accuracy of responses to this Pre-Qualification Application. The undersigned declares and certifies that the responses to this Pre-Qualification Application are complete and accurate; there are no omissions of material fact or information that would render any response to be false or misleading and there are no misstatements of fact in any of the responses. The above-identified Respondent acknowledges and agrees that if City of Oroville determines that any response herein is false or misleading or contains misstatements of fact, the Response shall be deemed non-responsive and the Respondent will not further participate in the RFP process.

Executed this___ day of __________________ 20______ at___________________________________. (City and State)
I declare under penalty of perjury under California law that the foregoing is true and correct. ________________________________________
(Signature)
________________________________________
(Name and Title)
[END OF SECTION]
393
Item 15.

Attachment A
General Conceptualized Scope
394
Item 15.

NEW CONSTRUCTION RENOVATION
- Renovation of existing Breakroom
- Remodel of existing bathroom and surrounding
rooms into singular space for womens locker room
- Addition of aprx 1800 sf
- addition to include mens locker room/changing space
- multipurpose meeting space
- location for laundry
- 3 bathrooms with ADA requirements in one space
- division of space with public facing loby
395
Item 15.

Main Entrance
with Lobby and Public
Facing Recpetion
Touchdown Room
- Centralized room with access to
the Utility Leads, Public Works.

Modular desk systems to
accommodate 6-8
Multipurpose Room
- Centralized with cafeteria tables that are
removable to accommodate larger conferences
or meetings.

Communal Laundry
- Space for up to 3 stackable
laundry units to be
designated for type of use
Mens
- New construction space to
hold locker room with
lockers and three
bathrooms with showers. 1
Unisex ADA unit included in
count
Womens
- Reconfigured Space
for Womens locker-room
shower space Improved Kitchen Room
- cabinet reconfiguration to
maximize storage and countertop
spaces
396
Item 15.

Public Works -
Facilities Manager
Public Works Division
- Street Lead
-Tree Lead
- Parks Lead
3 desks
2 plan reading stations
Public Works
Division
- Meeting Space (A)
Training Space Public Works Division
Public Works Division:
- 19 total employees
- Static Desks for Street Lead, Tree Lead, Parks Lead, Facilities Manager Remaining team needs access to computers for training * Public Works
Division
- Meeting Space (B)
* Is overlap with other departments a concern? What is the daily need for access to computers?
Public Works -
Director 397
Item 15.

Paint in All Rooms to
meet City Standards
Flooring in all Rooms. To
meet spec as installed at
Safety Building and
Convention Center
Bathrooms:
minimal updating
- unisex signage
- paint
Upgrades to the HVAC
system or separate
system for new
construction
Review of Roofing and
Inspection Reports to
address life of building.

Gutters and any dry rot
repairs if needed
Re-keying of entire
building
Public Facing ADA
upgrades. Bollards,
Rumble Strips, Ramps,
Auto door openers as
needed per survey
398
Item 15.
150'-0"
Roll-Up Bay Roll-Up Bay
Roll-Up Bay Roll-Up Bay
Bathrooms:
- update to
meet ADA
needs
Minimal
updating to
Truck-Break
Room and
existing
office spaces
Partition of
Space for
Mechanical
Remains as existing
399
Item 15.
403'-0" 400 Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 31
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

WITNESSETH, that OWNER and the DBE in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein agree as follows:

1. The Work. Within the Contract Time and for the Contract Price, subject to adjustments thereto pursuant to the Contract Documents, the DBE shall perform and provide all necessary labor, materials, tools, equipment, utilities, services and transportation to complete in a workmanlike manner all of the obligations of the DBE set forth in the Contract Documents in connection with the work of improvement commonly referred to as the City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project (“Project”). DBE shall provide all services and complete all Work covered by the Contract Documents, including without limitation, completion of Design Documents for the Project, obtaining City of Oroville approval/permit for construction of the Project and Project construction.

3. Contract Price. The Contract Price consists of the following separate components: (i) Preconstruction Services and (ii) Construction Services. The Preconstruction Services Contract Price is the fixed price lump sum of Thirty thousand Dollars ($30,000) (“Design-Build Preconstruction Services Contract Price”). The Construction Services Contract Price is a Guaranteed _________________________________ Dollars
($_______________).

5.2 DBE and Subcontractor Insurance Minimum Coverage Limits. The DBE and all Subcontractors shall obtain and maintain the following minimum coverage limits for the following policies of insurance:

5.2.1. Workers Compensation Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the Workers Compensation Insurance policy shall be in accordance with the Laws.

5.2.2. Employers Liability Insurance. The minimum coverage limit of the Employers Liability insurance policy shall be One Million Dollars ($1,000,000).

United Building Contractors Maximum Price of __________ one million seven hundred forty seven thousand, nine hundred eight five 1,747,985.00
26 401
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 32
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

7. Hours and Days of Work at the Site. The DBE’s construction activities at the Site shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. Mondays through Fridays, except for OWNER holiday days.

8. Notices. Notices from the DBE and OWNER to the other shall be addressed as follows:

If to OWNER
If to the DBE:
________________________
________________________
________________________
________________________

9. The Contract Documents. The documents forming a part of the Contract Documents consist of this Agreement and the following, all of which are component parts of the Contract Documents.

9.1. RFP Response Instructions

9.2. DB Collaborative Preconstruction Proposal

9.3. Subcontractor’s List

9.4. Non-Collusion Affidavit

9.5. Certification of Workers Compensation Insurance

9.6. Drug-Free Workplace Certification

9.7. DBE Certification

9.8. DBE Agreement for Design-Build Preconstruction Services

9.9. DBE Agreement for Design-Build Construction Services

9.10. Agreement for Design-Build Services General Conditions

9.11. Pre-Qualification Application

9.12. Liquidated Damages

9.13. Attachment A – General Conceptualized Scope

9.14. DBE Schematic drawings

9.15. DBE GMP Cost Breakdown

9.16. DBE Project Schedule

City of Oroville
Attention Tim Kaber
1735 Montgomery St
Oroville CA 95965
If to the DBE:
________________________
________________________
________________________
275 Fairchild Ave, Suite 106 Chico CA 95973 United Building Contractors 402
Item 15.

City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project
Request for Proposals P a g e | 33
City of Oroville – Corporation Yard Project – Multi-Building Remodel and Site Work

BOX 2600, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95826
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed by OWNER and the DBE as of the date set forth above.
“OWNER”
The City of Oroville
By:
__________________________________
Title:
_________________________________
“DBE”
[DBE NAME]
By:
__________________________________
Title:
_________________________________
403
Item 15.

CAL OAK ROAD
(E) ROOF
A2.1
10 A1.2
10 02 106
02 114
G1
S 5TH AVE

PROPERTY LINE

FIRE HYDRANT
(E) LANDSCAPING
(E) ASPHALT PAVING
(E) CONCRETE
(N) CONCRETE`

LIMIT OF WORK

LINE OF ROOF, SKYLIGHT, OR SOFFIT

OVERHEAD - SHOWN DASHED
(E) FENCING TO REMAIN
(N) FENCING

FLOW LINE

FIRE SPRINKLER LINE
(E) FENCE TO BE DEMO'D

BUILDINGS WITHIN SCOPE OF WORK
T R HI
A
C
TC

R MO I E E T
B
IC L
E
W
N
P
RIENSA
D
Ren. 9/30/25
No. C 30345 H CALIF
A
OR I N
S
OF
T
TA
E

DSA BACK CHECK

DSA PLAN CHECK

CONSTRUCTION

BIDDING

DRAWING STATUS
DATE

ARCHITECT ENGINEER
Drawing Number
Drawn
Application Number
DateGENERAL NOTES

1. This sheet is part of a set and is not to be used alone.

2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on the drawings and the status box indicated drawings have been released for construction.

3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only.

Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2024.

REVISION HISTORY

KEY PLAN
Studio W Architects
1930 H Street
Sacramento, California 95811
[ T ] 916.254.5600
www.StudioW-Architects.com
PRINT DATE:FILE PATH:

NOT

FOR CONSTRUCTION

DSA STAMP
Project Number
Checked
Autodesk Docs://25023 City of Oroville Corp Yard/25023 - City of Oroville Corp Yard V2.rvt 2/25/2026 11:55:23 AM
A1.1

PROJECT STATUS
AF

XX-XXXXXX
09/24/25

CORPORATE YARD
655 CAL OAK ROAD,
OROVILLE, CA 95965

SITE PLAN OVERALL
25023
TY

CITY OF OROVILLE
1275 MITCHELL AVE.

OROVILLE, CA 95965

CITY OF OROVILLE
DATE SIGNED: 09/24/25
1" = 30'-0"
REF: 7 / A5.1
SITE PLAN 10

NUMBER NOTE
02 106 (E) FENCING
02 114 (E) ELECTRICAL SERVICE

KEYNOTES
LEGEND

GENERAL NOTES

1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 6'-0" HIGH TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION

BARRIER WITH VISION SCREEN AT STAGING, STORAGE AND CONSTRUCTION AREA WITH SIGNAGE EVERY 20'-0".

2. CONTRACTOR TO BRING IN OFFICE TRAILER TO CONSTRUCTION AREA.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCESS THE SITE FROM CAL OAK ROAD ANY DAMAGE TO FIRE LANE WILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.

4. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR BACK TO EXISTING CONDITIONS ALL LAYDOWN AREAS AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS INCLUDES LANDSCAPE AREAS AND ANY BROKEN SPRINKLERS, VALVE BOXES, CONCRETE, ASPHALT, ETC.

5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, RECONSTRUCT AND REPAIR ALL EXISTING

WORK THAT IS IMPACTED, DAMAGED, OR DESTROYED AS A RESULT OF ANY

CONTRACTOR WORK INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, HARDSCAPING,

SIDEWALKS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, LANDSCAPING, LAWNS, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES - ALL TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DISTRICT.

6. WHERE ASPHALT OR CONCRETE IS BEING REPATCHED, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE EVEN AND STRAIGHT LINE CUTS WITH 2-FOOT STRAIGHT SLURRY SEAL SURFACE PATCH ON BOTH SIDES OF CUT.

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN EXCAVATING AND TRENCHING ON SITE TO AVOID EXISTING DUCTS, PIPING OR CONDUITS, ETC.,

AND TO PREVENT HAZARDS TO PERSONNEL AND/OR DAMAGE TO EXISTING

UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN AND INSTALLED BY ANY OTHER CONTRACTS. THE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE

FOR THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN OR DETAILED AND INSTALLED BY ANY OTHER CONTRACTS.

THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT SHOULD SUCH UNIDENTIFIED CONDITIONS BE DISCOVERED. THESE DRAWINGS AND

SPECIFICATIONS DO NOT INCLUDE THE NECESSARY ELEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION SAFETY.

8. GATES IN PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL COMPLY WITH EXIT DOOR REQUIREMENTS WITH PROPER LEVER HARDWARE AND KICK PLATES.

N
NO. REMARKS DATE
404
Item 15.

CAL OAK RD.

ALTERNATE #8:

SLURRY, RESEAL, AND RESTRIPE FOR ALL OF PARKING AREA
ALTERNATE #7:

NEW MOTORIZED

VEHICLE GATE
(E) LANDSCAPING
(E) ASPHALT PAVING
(E) CONCRETE
(N) CONCRETE
(E) FENCING TO REMAIN
(N) FENCING

FLOW LINE

FIRE SPRINKLER LINE

BUILDINGS WITHIN SCOPE OF WORK
T
R H
I
A C
TC
R
MO
I E
E
T
B
IC L
E
W N P
RI
ENS
A
D
Ren. 9/30/25
No. C 30345
H
CALIF
A
OR I N
S
OF
T TA E

DSA BACK CHECK

DSA PLAN CHECK

CONSTRUCTION

BIDDING

DRAWING STATUS
DATE

ENGINEERARCHITECT
Drawing Number
Drawn
Application Number
DateGENERAL NOTES

1. This sheet is part of a set and is not to be used alone.

2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on the drawings and the status box indicated drawings have been released for construction.

3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only.

Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2024.

REVISION HISTORY

KEY PLAN
Studio W Architects
1930 H Street
Sacramento, California 95811
[ T ] 916.254.5600
www.StudioW-Architects.com
PRINT DATE:FILE PATH:

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DSA STAMP
Project Number
Checked
Autodesk Docs://25023 City of Oroville Corp Yard/25023 - City of Oroville Corp Yard V2.rvt 2/25/2026 11:55:29 AM
A1.2

PROJECT STATUS
AF

XX-XXXXXX
09/24/25

CORPORATE YARD
655 CAL OAK ROAD,
OROVILLE, CA 95965

ENLARGED SITE PLAN
25023
TY

CITY OF OROVILLE
1275 MITCHELL AVE.

OROVILLE, CA 95965

CITY OF OROVILLE
DATE SIGNED: 09/24/25
1" = 10'-0"
REF: 10 / A1.1
ENLARGED SITE PLAN 10

KEYNOTES
LEGEND

GENERAL NOTES

NUMBER NOTE
N
NO. REMARKS DATE
405
Item 15.

UP
FD

GENERAL

1. ALL WALLS SHALL HAVE R-19 BATT INSULATION, FULL HEIGHT.

2. PAINT ALL INTERIOR WALLS.

3. DOORS SHALL BE INSTALLED 4" FROM JAMB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

4. ALL FIRE WALLS THAT HAVE A CONCEALED FLOOR-CEILING ATTIC SPACE

SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY AND PERMANENTLY IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNS OR STENCILING READING "FIRE AND/OR SMOKE BARRIER - PROTECT ALL OPENINGS" IN THE CONCEALED SPACE. THE IDENTIFICATION SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN 15 FEET OF THE END OF EACH WALL AT INTERVALS NOT EXCEEDING 30 FEET HORIZONTALLY. THE LETTERING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 3" TALL AND HAVE A MINIMUM STROKE OF 3/8".

5. ALL DEMOLITION WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH CFC CHAPTER 33 OF THE FIRE CODE AND CBC CHAPTER 33 OF THE BUILDING CODE FOR SAFETY

DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION AND CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE (PART 10) FOR EXISTING STRUCTURES.

6. THESE DEMOLITION PLANS AND NOTES ARE COMPLIMENTARY TO ALL

OTHER PLANS AND DETAILS AND MAY NOT REFLECT THE FULL EXTENT OF ALL DEMOLITION WORK REQUIRED. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE

RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE DEMOLITION REQUIRED AND ALL

DEMOLITION WORK SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID (UNLESS

SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE) AS NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND/OR COMPLETE THIS PROJECT.

7. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK, USING THE CONTRACTOR'S BEST SKILL AND ATTENTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE

RESPONSIBLE FOR AND HAVE CONTROL OVER CONSTRUCTION MEANS,

METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, (UNLESS A SEQUENCE IS SPECIFIED

BY THE OWNER OR CONTRACT DOCUMENTS) AND PROCEDURES, AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK.

STRUCTURE

1. DIMENSIONS OF WALLS ARE FROM FACE OF STUD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

2. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT IS REQUIRED.

NEW ENVELOPE INSULATION AREA CALCULATIONS:

ROOF AREA: 15,105 SF
WALL AREA: 7,690 SF
7 A5.1
7 A5.2
9 A5.1
9 A5.2
A
A
B
B
C
C
F
F
G
G
H
H
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
D
D
E
E
12,869 SF
SHOP
123
223 SF

MUD & TOOL
ROOM
125
155 SF

MULTI-USER

RESTROOM
126
72 SF

SINGLE USER

RESTROOM
127
146 SF

STORAGE -
SEWER
128
141 SF

STORAGE -
PLANS
129
149 SF

STORAGE -

IRRIGATION
130
149 SF

STORAGE -
PIPE
131
153 SF

STORAGE -
MECH.
132
136 SF

STORAGE -

UNASSIGNED
133
OFFICE
124
24 SF

UTILITIES
134
4'-0 1/2" 3'-4 3/4"
1'-4 1/4"
5'-10"
126A
D
2'-4"
1A 1B
(E) ROLL UP DOOR TO REMAIN (E) ROLL UP DOOR TO REMAIN
ALTERNATE #2: INFILL WITH METAL

FRAMING AND SIDING TO MATCH

EXISTING
8'-0" 8'-0 3/4"
71 SF

SINGLE USER

RESTROOM
128
EQ EQ6'-10"6'-4 1/2"
ALIGN
1 A6.1
1 A6.1
ALTERNATE #2: ADD (N)
MOTORIZED ROLL UP DOORS (1A
AND 1B), ELECTRICAL TO PROVIDE
POWER.
125A 124A
PER STRUCTURAL REPORT:

SOME UPGRADES AND REVISIONS TO (E) NONDOCUMENTED MEZZANINE MAY BE REQUIRED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:

PERIMETER SHOULD BE CUT BACK 3"-4" AND ANY

UTLITY CONNECTIONS THAT CROSS FROM THE

METAL BUILDING TO THE MEZZANINE SHOULD
ADD FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS.

UPDATES TO WHAT APPEAR TO BE SHEAR

WALLS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL SHEATHING

NAILING, ADDING PLATE WASHERS AT ANCHOR

BOLDS, NEW SILL ANCHORAGE, ADDING POSTS
AND HOLDOWNS. NEW PAD FOOTINGS MAY BE
REQUIRED AT HOLDOWNS.

COLD FORMED STRAPS ADDED TO THE
DIAPHRAGM ABOVE EACH AT EACH SHEAR WALL.
(N) 10'-0" LONG SHEAR WALL ON NORTH SIDE.

PER STRUCT. REPORT:

ANY (N) VEHICLE LIFTS AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT
GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1,500 LBS. MAY
REQUIRE (N) ISOLATED PAD FOOTINGS.

ALL EQUIPMENT GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO
400 LBS WILL REQUIRE ANCHORS TO THE SLAB
PER STRUCTURAL:
(N) ROLL UP DOORS SHALL REQUIRE
(N) HSS JAMB AND HEADER AND
APPROPRIATE FOOTINGS.

PER STRUCT. REPORT: AT SOUTH

WALL, SEVERAL (E) BRACED FRAME

TIE RODS HAVE LOST TENSION AND
ARE SAGGING. EITHER REPLACE OR

REPAIR/RETENSION

EXTERIOR WALL WITH METAL SIDING

LINE OF ROOF, SKYLIGHT, OR SOFFIT

OVERHEAD - SHOWN DASHED
INTERIOR 6" STUD WALL

DOOR NUMBER, SEE DOOR SCHEDULE

WINDOW, STOREFRONT, OR CURTAINWALL

SEE WINDOW SCHEDULE
A101A
A
INTERIOR 4" STUD WALL
T
R H
I
A C
TC
R
MO
I E
E
T
B
IC L
E
W N P
RI
ENS
A
D
Ren. 9/30/25
No. C 30345
H
CALIF
A
OR I N
S
OF
T TA E

DSA BACK CHECK

DSA PLAN CHECK

CONSTRUCTION

BIDDING

DRAWING STATUS
DATE

ENGINEERARCHITECT
Drawing Number
Drawn
Application Number
DateGENERAL NOTES

1. This sheet is part of a set and is not to be used alone.

2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on the drawings and the status box indicated drawings have been released for construction.

3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only.

Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2024.

REVISION HISTORY

KEY PLAN
Studio W Architects
1930 H Street
Sacramento, California 95811
[ T ] 916.254.5600
www.StudioW-Architects.com
PRINT DATE:FILE PATH:

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DSA STAMP
Project Number
Checked
Autodesk Docs://25023 City of Oroville Corp Yard/25023 - City of Oroville Corp Yard V2.rvt 2/25/2026 11:55:34 AM
A2.1

PROJECT STATUS
AF

XX-XXXXXX
09/24/25

CORPORATE YARD
655 CAL OAK ROAD,
OROVILLE, CA 95965

FLOOR PLAN
25023
TY

CITY OF OROVILLE
1275 MITCHELL AVE.

OROVILLE, CA 95965

CITY OF OROVILLE
DATE SIGNED: 09/24/25

KEYNOTES
LEGEND

GENERAL NOTES

NUMBER NOTE
N
NO. REMARKS DATE
1/8" = 1'-0"
REF: 10 / A1.1
FLOOR PLAN 10
MARK

DOOR FRAME
SIZE
TYPE
MAT.

FINISH
CORE

PAIRMTL
PANEL
WIDTH
HT THK
1A - 20'-0" 16'-0" 3" O STL FF INS STL
1B - 20'-0" 16'-0" 3" O STL FF INS STL
406
Item 15.

UP
FD
WH
8 A5.1
8 A5.2
10 A5.1
10 A5.2

AABBCCFFGGHH
77 66
55 44
33 22
11 DDEE
(E) HAIR PINS

IN SLAB TO
REMAIN, TYP.

PLUMBING CHASE NOT
CONFIRMED.

ASSUMPTION BASED ON

FIELD DIMENSIONS
31 1/4" 63 1/4"

DEMOLISH EXISTING WING WALL

RELOCATE EXISTING HOSE BIB
PER STRUCT. REPORT:

ANY (N) VEHICLE LIFTS AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT
GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 1,500 LBS. MAY
REQUIRE (N) ISOLATED PAD FOOTINGS.

ALL EQUIPMENT GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO
400 LBS WILL REQUIRE ANCHORS TO THE SLAB
10'-6"
8'-6"
(E) TO BE DEMOLISHED, REMOVED, AND/OR RELOCATED
(E) TO REMAIN

DEMOLITION

1. NO DEMOLITION SHALL BEGIN UNTIL PLANS INCLUDING THE DEMOLITION WORK HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE AHJ.

2. DURING REQUIRED ON-SITE VISIT, CONTRACTOR SHALL INVENTORY AND

IDENTIFY ALL GENERAL CONSTRUCTION (CONTRACTOR SALVAGE) TO BE DEMOLISHED AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.

3. CONTRACTOR REMOVED ITEMS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY OFF SITE AND IN AN EXPEDITIOUS MANNER.

EXISTING CONSTRUCTION

1. VERIFICATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS:

A. IN THE REMODELING OF AN EXISTING BUILDING CERTAIN ASSUMPTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE REGARDING EXISTING CONDITIONS. SOME OF THESE

ASSUMPTIONS MAY NOT BE VERIFIABLE WITHOUT EXPENDING

ADDITIONAL SUMS OF MONEY, OR DESTROYING OTHERWISE
SERVICEABLE PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT

IMMEDIATELY FOR GUIDANCE ON HOW TO PROCEED WHEN CONDITIONS

ARE DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION WHICH DIFFER FROM THOSE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS.

2. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE EXISTING AND APPROXIMATE.

VERIFY IN FIELD.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION SHOWN TO

REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION, FOR THE EXTENT OF THE DEMOLITION AND MODIFICATION.

4. REMOVE ALL EXISTING NON-USED PIPES AND CONDUITS OVERHEAD FOR A

CLEAN INSTALLATION OF NEW MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, AND CEILINGS - OR RECAP AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER.

5. CONTRACTOR TO CAP ALL UTILITIES NOT SHOWN TO BE REUSED BELOW FLOORS, INSIDE WALLS OR ABOVE CEILINGS.

6. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF OLD HOODS, INCLUDING DISCONNECTION OF ANSUL SYSTEMS. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVAL AND CLOSE OFF OF OLD HOOD SHAFTS. CONTRACTOR TO

PATCH AND PAINT ABANDONED SHAFT OPENING LOCATION TO MATCH EXISTING FINISHES AND PREP FOR NEW WORK.

7. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FLOOR REPAIR AFTER DEMOLITION OF (E) COOLER BOXES. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING SAFE OFF OF COOLER BOX DEMO. CONTRACTOR TO DISPOSE OF DEMOLISHED BOXES.

PREPARATION FOR NEW WORK

1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOWERING ELECTRICAL, CONDUITS, PIPING, CLEANOUTS, ETC, AS NECESSARY FOR NEW FLOOR FINISHES.

2. REFER TO FLOOR FINISH PLAN FOR MORE INFORMATION ON SLAB CLEANING AND PREPARATION.

3. PATCH, CAULK, SET PROTRUDING NAILS AND REPAIR ALL SURFACES AND

CRACKS WHERE NECCESSARY WITH SUITABLE PATCHING MATERIALS AND SMOOTH OFF TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACES.

4. REMOVE ALL SIGNAGE, CLEAN AND PAINT SURFACE BEHIND AND REINSTALL SIGNAGE.

SHORING

1. SHORING OF STRUCTURAL FOUNDATIONS, STRUCTURES, AND/OR TRENCHING

REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION

DOCUMENTS IS CONSIDERED A METHOD OR TECHNIQUE AND IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. IF A REGULATORY AGENCY REQUIRES A

LICENSED ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT TO SUPERVISE, APPROVE, AND/OR

PROVIDE DRAWINGS FOR SHORING OF STRUCTURAL FOUNDATIONS,

STRUCTURES, AND/OR TRENCHING, THEN IT IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF

THE CONTRACTOR TO CONTRACT WITH THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THIS WORK AS PART OF THE BASE BID.

2. ALL STRUCTURAL DEMO WORK SHALL BE PROPERLY SHORED PRIOR TO DEMO

AND IF NEED BE, INSPECTED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL WITH COST BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR.

T R HI
A
C
TC

R MO I E E T
B
IC L
E
W
N
P
RIENSA
D
Ren. 9/30/25
No. C 30345 H CALIF
A
OR I N
S
OF
T
TA
E

DSA BACK CHECK

DSA PLAN CHECK

CONSTRUCTION

BIDDING

DRAWING STATUS
DATE

ENGINEERARCHITECT
Drawing Number
Drawn
Application Number
DateGENERAL NOTES

1. This sheet is part of a set and is not to be used alone.

2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on the drawings and the status box indicated drawings have been released for construction.

3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only.

Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2024.

REVISION HISTORY

KEY PLAN
Studio W Architects
1930 H Street
Sacramento, California 95811
[ T ] 916.254.5600
www.StudioW-Architects.com
PRINT DATE:FILE PATH:

NOT

FOR CONSTRUCTION

DSA STAMP
Project Number
Checked
Autodesk Docs://25023 City of Oroville Corp Yard/25023 - City of Oroville Corp Yard V2.rvt 2/25/2026 11:55:38 AM
A2.2

PROJECT STATUS
AF

XX-XXXXXX
09/24/25

CORPORATE YARD
655 CAL OAK ROAD,
OROVILLE, CA 95965

DEMO FLOOR PLAN
25023
TY

CITY OF OROVILLE
1275 MITCHELL AVE.

OROVILLE, CA 95965

CITY OF OROVILLE
DATE SIGNED: 09/24/25

KEYNOTES
LEGEND

GENERAL NOTES

NUMBER NOTE
N
NO. REMARKS DATE
1/8" = 1'-0"
REF: 7 / A5.1
DEMO FLOOR PLAN 10
NOTE: SAW CUT SLAB FOR NEW PLUMBING

FIXTURES, SHOW EXISTING PLUMBING TO

BE DEMO'D HERE AS WELL
407
Item 15.

UP
FD
WH

W/D W/D
FD
A
A
B
B
C
C
F
F
G
G
H
H
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
D
D
E
E
SHOP
123

MUD & TOOL
ROOM
125

MULTI-USER

RESTROOM
126

SINGLE USER

RESTROOM
127

STORAGE -

UNASSIGNED
133

STORAGE -
MECH.
132

STORAGE -
PIPE
131

STORAGE -

IRRIGATION
130

STORAGE -
SEWER
128

STORAGE -
PLANS
129
OFFICE
124
3 FIXTURE TROUGH SINK
IDF
135

SINGLE USER

RESTROOM
128

CARPET TILE
EPOXY

EXISTING EXPOSED CONCRETE TO REMAIN

VINYL COMPOSITE TILE

FLOOR DRAIN
T
R H
I
A C
TC
R
MO
I E
E
T
B
IC L
E
W N P
RI
ENS
A
D
Ren. 9/30/25
No. C 30345
H
CALIF
A
OR I N
S
OF
T TA E

DSA BACK CHECK

DSA PLAN CHECK

CONSTRUCTION

BIDDING

DRAWING STATUS
DATE

ENGINEERARCHITECT
Drawing Number
Drawn
Application Number
DateGENERAL NOTES

1. This sheet is part of a set and is not to be used alone.

2. This sheet is not to be used for construction unless the architect's stamp and signature appear on the drawings and the status box indicated drawings have been released for construction.

3. These plans and prints thereof, as instruments of service, are owned by the architect and are for use on this project only.

Reproduction and/or distribution without the prior written consent of the architect is forbidden.

4. Copyright Studio W Associates, Inc. 2024.

REVISION HISTORY

KEY PLAN
Studio W Architects
1930 H Street
Sacramento, California 95811
[ T ] 916.254.5600
www.StudioW-Architects.com
PRINT DATE:FILE PATH:

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DSA STAMP
Project Number
Checked
Autodesk Docs://25023 City of Oroville Corp Yard/25023 - City of Oroville Corp Yard V2.rvt 2/25/2026 11:55:42 AM
A2.3

PROJECT STATUS
AF

XX-XXXXXX
09/24/25

CORPORATE YARD
655 CAL OAK ROAD,
OROVILLE, CA 95965

EQUIPMENT & FLOOR

PATTERN PLAN
25023
TY

CITY OF OROVILLE
1275 MITCHELL AVE.

OROVILLE, CA 95965

CITY OF OROVILLE
DATE SIGNED: 09/24/25
1/8" = 1'-0"
REF: 7 / A5.1
EQUIPMENT & FLOOR PATTERN PLAN 10

FINISH PLAN LEGEND
N

GENERAL NOTES

1. SEE ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION.

2. CONCRETE IN CARPETED AREAS DOES NOT HAVE A SPECIFIC SCORING PATTERN BUT CONTROL JOINTS MUST NOT EXCEED 10'-0" O.C. MAX.

SPACING.

NO. REMARKS DATE
408
Item 15.