Oxnard City Council
March 15, 2022

No physical development is proposed with this request. Any future development proposals would be required to comply with the 2030 General Plan, the RPSP, and applicable development standards. All future proposals would also be subject to compliance with the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

For purposes of this Staff Report, the foregoing project description shall be referred to as the “Project.” The project application was filed by Jonathan K. Cornelius of Fore Property, 1004 Santa Barbara Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (collectively referred to as the “Applicant” or “Developer.”)

3. Existing & Surrounding Land Uses: The 702-acre RiverPark Specific Plan site is located in the western portion of Ventura County, in the northwestern edge of the City of Oxnard, and is bounded by the Ventura Freeway (Highway 101) to the South, Vineyard Avenue to the east, Central Road to the North, and the Santa Clara River to the west. This project site is located southwesterly of the intersection of North Ventura Road and Town Center Drive, within the RiverPark Specific Plan Area, at 2700 and 2750 North Ventura Road (APNs: 132-0-100-085 and 132-0-100-095) (Attachment A). The RiverPark Specific Plan area is currently under active development and operation.

The following table provides City General Plan designations, City zoning which governs the area. Additionally, the table identifies a general summary of existing land uses.

Table 1
LOCATION ZONING 2030

GENERAL PLAN

EXISTING LAND USE
Project Site The RiverPark Specific
Plan
Commercial
Regional Vacant
North The RiverPark Specific
Plan
Commercial
Regional
Light Industrial
Development
East
The RiverPark Specific
Plan
Commercial
Regional
Commercial/senior
living facility
South The RiverPark Specific
Plan
Residential:

Medium-High,
and Park
Wagon Wheel
552
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

West County Unincorporated County
Unincorporated
Santa Clara River

4. Background Information: The RPSP was adopted by the City Council on September 10, 2002, together with the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Annexation, Development Agreement, and EIR certification related to the RPSP approval. The original RPSP allowed for the phased development of 2,805 dwelling units and 2,485,000 square feet of commercial development (including approximately 221,000 square feet of existing office development that was approved and building unter the Oxnard Town Center Specific Plan, prior to the adoption of the RPSP). The original RPSP was developed following the design principles of the New Urbanism and Smart Growth movements, which emphasized the importance of mixed land uses in close proximity, communities scaled for pedestrian walkability; limiting the need for automobile usage; higher density development, and the importance of physical design.

Six previous amendments to the RPSP have been approved.

1. The Council approved the first amendment request (PZ 02-630-05) on October 22, 2002, which amended the new RPSP to include regulations for temporary uses.

2. The Council approved the second amendment request (PZ 03-630-03) on July 27, 2004, allowing a minor change in the land use designation on a small parcel from Open Space to Commercial.

3. The Council approved the third amendment request (PZ 09-630-09) on April 14, 2009, allowing a freeway-oriented pylon sign subject to approval of a Design Development Review permit (DDR) by the Development Services Director.

4. The fourth amendment (PZ 10-630-02), was approved by the City Council on June 14, 2011, and allows three freeway oriented monument signs subject to approval of a DDR, and an electronic digital display panel for the pylon sign, subject to subsequent approval of a Special Use Permit.

5. The fifth amendment (PZ 09-630-03), was approved by the City Council on June 5, 2012.

The fifth amendment increased the maximum number of dwelling units from 2,805 to 3,043 units, and reduced the maximum amount of commercial development from 2,485,000 to 2,098,000 square feet. The additional units were to be located in District D of the RPSP.

6. The sixth amendment (PZ 18-630-01), was approved by the City Council on February 19, 2019, to amend the text of the RPSP to allow two (2) monument signs in Planning Districts B and C, subject to subsequent approval of a DDR.

According to California Government Code Section 65453, a specific plan may be amended as often as deemed necessary by the legislative body.

The RPSP applies to several properties which were not among the holdings of the original RiverPark development partnerships, including the original Oxnard Town Center subdivision. The proposed DAA applies to the two remaining vacant parcels within the 553
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

original Oxnard Town Center subdivision. The two parcels consist of a total of 4.23 acres designated for commercial development. The original Development Agreement placed these two remaining vacant parcels on a par with the parcels governed by the original RiverPark Development Agreement.

On November 18, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2787, approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 08-670-03 (Development Agreement No. A-7113) between the owners of the Project site and the City of Oxnard. The Development Agreement (DA) has been amended on one previous occasion.

1. The previous amendment, adopted November 9, 2010, related to development fees within the RPSP area.

The Fore Property DAA does not cover the properties or development outside the proposed District B.

A concurrent RPSP Amendment application (PZ 20-630-01) requesting several revisions to the Land Use Plan and text of The RPSP, is currently in process. In summary, the amended sections of the RPSP include provisions for the following:

1. To allow for an increase in the maximum number of residential units allowed under the RPSP and potential reduction of commercial square footage as would occur under various development options, which have been identified in Table 2, below. In addition, add a new section outlining the application of development options for residential or commercial development in RPSP Districts B, C, and D would be added.

Table 2
Project Wide Maximum Allowed Development Under the Residential Development Options
Residential
Options Selected
by District
Maximum Number of
Residential Units
Maximum square feet of retail,
hotel/convention, and office uses
B, C, D 4,068 1,535,543
B & C 3,656 1,761,623
C & D 3,735 1,718,273
B & D 3,788 1,689,190
B 3,376 1,915,270
C 3,323 1,944,353
D 3,455 1,871,920
No Residential 3,043 2,098,000
554
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

2. Adjustment in the distribution of commercial building square footage among the RPSP Districts, including the reduction of the maximum amount of commercial in Districts F, G, I, and J and a corresponding increase in the commercial square footage of RPSP District D.

3. Add a 7th residential product type (7-R) called Apartments-Urban. The SPA will provide development standards for the new housing type, including building coverage, building height, open space requirements, parking requirements, setbacks, and access requirements.

4. Provide the maximum number of units per bedroom unit types for the additional residential development. This is to ensure the final unit mix and population numbers are consistent with the analysis provided in Addendum 15 to the RPSP FEIR.

5. Reconfigure the boundary of RPSP District B in Exhibits 2.B, 2.C, 2.D, 2.I, and

3.C to be consistent with the development that has taken place or been entitled in RPSP District B and C.

5. Environmental Analysis: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), on July 16, 2002, the City Council certified FEIR No. 00-03 for The RPSP (State Clearinghouse No. 2000051046) and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations. The FEIR No. 00-03 found four areas of significant impacts (Earth Resources-Mineral Resources, Water Quality, Agricultural Resources, and Cultural Resources-Historical Resources).

An environmental consultant, under the supervision of Planning Division staff, has prepared Addendum No. 15 to the approved FEIR No. 00-03, and subsequent addenda (Attachment C & D) to evaluate potential environmental impacts of the proposed Project. Addendum No. 15 to the FEIR No. 00-03 was prepared pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public resources Code § 21000, et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (14 California Code of Regulations, §15000, et seq., CEQA Guidelines), and the City’s Environmental Review Guidelines. The City of Oxnard is the Lead Agency. Addendum No. 15 is appropriate pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15164 since only minor changes and additions to FEIR No. 00-03 are necessary to address the Project changes and no circumstances exist calling for the preparation of an additional CEQA document pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15162 and 15163.

The proposed Project has been reviewed under an Addendum to FEIR No. 00-03, and subsequent addenda, for the RPSP. According to Section 15164 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Addendum to a previously certified EIR is required when only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to previously approved EIR, and none of the conditions requiring a subsequent EIR have occurred. addendum evaluated each of the residential option development scenarios proposed with the RPSP Amendment No. 7 (PZ 20-630-01). The evaluation determined that none of the scenarios would result in a substantial increase in severity of significant environmental impacts previously analyzed in the certified EIR and the scenarios would not result in any new significant impacts. The Fore 555
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

DAA updates the DA to reflect the changes proposed in the RPSP, along with fee adjustments. Addendum No. 15 does not require public circulation because it does not provide significant new information that changes the FEIR No. 00-03 in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the Project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect.

Addendum No. 15 used the City of Oxnard CEQA Thresholds and California recommended thresholds to determine if an environmental impact was large enough to be considered significant. No additional significant impacts were identified in Addendum No. 15 prepared for this Project, nor would the Project substantially increase the severity of previously anticipated significant impacts. Lastly, the original mitigations will remain applicable. These mitigations will be applicable to any future projects developed under the specific plan.

Therefore, staff has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the Project would result in new or substantially more severe impacts than those identified in FEIR No. 00-03.

Accordingly, none of the conditions that trigger the need to prepare a subsequent Environmental Impact Report pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15162 would occur. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15164, the Commission shall consider Addendum No. 15 with FEIR No. 00-03 and all subsequent addendums prior to making recommendations on the Project.

6. Analysis:
a. General Discussion: Pursuant to Oxnard City Code (OCC) Section 2-95, the Planning Commission is an advisory body which provides land use recommendations to the City Council on items such as General Plan Amendments, Specific Plans, Ordinance Amendments and Development Agreements.

The Applicant is requesting a DAA. The following is a summary of the requested revisions. The original RPSP was adopted in 2002, since then much of the buildout has been completed. Under the adopted RPSP the Fore Property DAA project area was allowed to have 104,000 square feet of commercial or office space, however, the site remains undeveloped. As market conditions have changed significantly since the original adoption of the RPSP, the Applicant has indicated that there is no longer sufficient demand to support the additional commercial space. As a result, the Applicant is requesting an amendment to the existing Development Agreement to account for the proposed residential and adjust fees.

Second DAA
The proposed DAA would be the second Amendment to DA A-7113 between the City of Oxnard and Oxnard Coastal Investments, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company and Ventura Land Development Company, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company.
556
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

For the Second DAA, the Applicant is requesting modifications to ten sections of DA No.

A-7113. At the City Council’s public hearing on May 19, 2020, the Council directed staff to work with the Developer on revisions to the DA to reduce the financial impacts of increased and new development impact fees on the project. In response, the Developer is requesting a fee lock and waiver of new fee increases approved by the City Council on May 19, 2020. The Developer would receive fee credits for improvement costs associated with construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities and art provided in the Collection.

The following is a summary of DAA requests. A discussion on each item is provided in Section 6(d) of this staff report and the DAA text is provided in Attachment B.

1. Extend the term of DA for a period of approximately five and a half (5.5) years to July 1, 2028.

2. Set applicable impact fees at the rates effective September 24, 2018 for the term of the agreement, except as otherwise modified.

3. Waive future Quimby and Park-related Fees.

4. Adjust Growth Fee based on proposed development populations.

5. Set the Traffic Impact Fee at the rate in effect September 24, 2018 for the term of the agreement.

6. Set the Drainage Impact Fee at the rate in effect September 24, 2018 for the term of the agreement.

7. Adjust Mobility Fee based on proposed development populations and Provide credit toward new Mobility Fee, based on credit for existing bicycle and pedestrian facilities constructed as part of the buildout of the RiverPark Specific Plan.

8. Allow for the payment of public art fees or the provision of public art onsite.

9. Set affordable housing requirements for additional units.

10. Maintenance Agreement for Access Road with Caltrans. b. General Plan Consistency: The City’s 2030 General Plan land use designation for the subject site is Commercial Regional (CR) with corresponding land use designations to support development of the approved RPSP. The proposed DAA is consistent with the proposed SPA to The RPSP and the 2030 General Plan and the property’s land use designations. Since the original approval of the RPSP the City adopted the 2030 General Plan, including the 2021-2029 Housing Element in October 2021. The 2030 General Plan has four major themes, one of which is to develop or reinvest within the City Urban Reserve Boundary (CURB) with an “urban village” concept. The urban villages would incorporate private and public redevelopment, mixed land uses, affordable and workforce housing, and transit connectivity and are intended to be a key strategy for meeting GHG emission reduction targets and implementing the Southern California Association of Governments regional Sustainable Community Strategy (SB 375). 557
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

The proposed DAA renegotiates fees and development timing between Developer and the City, and does not conflict with General Plan land use, goals and policies. The project’s consistency review with General Plan policies is included as Attachment E. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the General Plan and the property’s land use designation.
c. Conformance with Zoning Development Standards: The proposed DAA does not propose revisions to zoning development standards. The revision, as identified in Section 6a above, would not conflict with existing or amended development standards within the Oxnard City Code or The RPSP.
d. DAA: The Applicant has requested modifications to DA No. A-7113 and DAA 1, which are collectively referred to as the Second DAA. The Developer is requesting a time extension of their existing agreement, fee modifications, define future affordable housing requirements, and off-site maintenance requirements. The following is a discussion of the requested DAA modifications.

The Second DAA will have a net public benefit of providing more affordable housing, promoting the full buildout of the RiverPark Specific Plan, additional tax revenue, and relieving the City from certain road maintenance requirements. The amendments are consistent with the FEIR. The Addendum to the FEIR, and subsequent addenda (Attachment C & D) are discussed in Section 5 of the staff report

1. Extension of Existing Development Agreement:
● Original DA Provision: The original Development Agreement was adopted by Ordinance 2787 on November 18, 2008 and became effective 30 days thereafter and shall remain in effect for a term of fourteen (14) years (November 18, 2022), unless the term is modified by mutual written consent of the City and the Developer.
● Proposed DA Revision: Agree to approve the request to extend the agreement to July 1, 2028 Agreement unless the term is modified by mutual written consent of the City and the Developer.
● Impact to the City: Since portions of the commercial land located in Riverpark remain vacant since 2005, this request to extend the DA and complete the Project build-out would have a positive impact to the City. Whether the final products to be built will be commercial or high-density units, the City would achieve additional tax revenue. In addition, Project build-out will enhance and protect the entire Riverpark area.

2. Set applicable impact fees at the rates effective September 24, 2018 for the term of the agreement, except as otherwise modified:
● Original DA Provision: Limitation on increase of certain fees including Growth Requirement Capital Fees; Planned Drainage Facilities Fees; Planned Traffic 558
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

Circulation Facilities Fees; Planned Wastewater Facilities Fees and Planned Water Facilities Fees (collectively “Existing Fees”) for five years at the rate in effect as of the Effective Date of the original DA.
● Proposed DA Revision: This amendment would lock the impact fee rates for Sewer Connection Fees, Water System Connection Fees, Storm Drain Fees, Air Quality Fees, and Utility Undergrounding Fees at the City of Oxnard rates Effective September 24, 2018.
● Impact to the City: Since these fees are currently in effect there would be no immediate financial impact to the City. However, if new rates were adopted for the fees covered, the increased revenue would be waived.

3. Provide Waiver of Quimby and Park Related Fees: A request to waive current and future Quimby and Park Development fees. The Parks Development fee funds park development costs and is not the same as the City’s Quimby fee, which is for park acquisition.
● Original DA Provision: Quimby and Park Related Fees were not addressed in the Original DA.
● Proposed DA Revision: This amendment would recognize that the value of such provided park areas within RiverPark far exceeds the Quimby and Park-Related Fees that the City would have otherwise be entitled to impose on the Project, and provided a waiver of payment of current and future City Quimby Fees and park-related fees for the term of this Agreement, including any extensions of the Agreement, or until the initial buildout of the Project occurs, whichever term is longer.
● Impact to the City: The parks have been constructed and the City has accepted an amount of park and recreational open space that far exceeds the amount required to properly serve the Project. As identified in the Addendum No. 15 to the FEIR, the current City of Oxnard standard for total developed acres of parkland is 3.0 acres per 1,000 population, as established by the Quimby Act. Individual standards for Neighborhood and Community Parks are 1.5 acres per 1,000 population. Using this standard, with the proposed Specific Plan amendment, approximately 16 acres of Neighborhood Park space and 16 acres of Community Park land would be required. The Specific Plan Area as developed includes approximately 23 acres of Neighborhood Park space and 30 acres of Community Park space.

4. Provided Alternative Capital Growth Impact Fee rate:

A request to lock in the growth impact fees (aka “Growth Fees”) to the rate in effect May 1, 2020. The Growth Fee funds facilities such as police and fire stations, city hall and community centers.
● Original DA Provision: The Fee charged to the Developer was the capital growth impact fee in effect on January 4, 2006. The original DA fixed the fees for a 559
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

period of 5 years, with that being extended an additional 5 years under the First DAA.
● Proposed DA Provision: The DAA would allow the Developer to pay an alternative Growth Fee based on the project density.
● Impact to the City: Under the City’s fee increase approved on May 19, 2020, this would increase the fee to $3,955 per dwelling unit for residential. This number was based on an average of 2.85 persons per unit. The analysis within Addendum No. 15 provides an average household size of 1.65. Using the City’s methodology this results in a fee of $2,290. Based on an estimated 333 dwelling units in RPSP District B, the total cost of this amendment (difference between the prior fee and the alternative fee) is approximately $554,559 in waived revenue respectively.

However, the alternative fees would offset the impacts of the potential residential development. No change to other rates would be made. All other projects would be subject to fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance.

5. Set the City’s Traffic Impact Fee rate:

A request to lock in the September 24, 2018 traffic impact fee (aka “Traffic Circulation Fee”). The City’s traffic circulation fee provides funding for roadway improvements to maintain acceptable level of service for new development. This amendment would apply to the City’s Traffic Circulation Fee and would not affect the County of Ventura Traffic Mitigation Fee.
● Original DA Provision: Limitation on increase of certain fees for five years after January 4, 2006, the City at the rate in effect as of the Effective Date. The original DA fixed the fees for a period of 5 years, with that being extended an additional 5 years under the First DAA.
● Proposed DA Provision: This amendment to Section would lock the existing traffic circulation fee to the fees in effect on September 24, 2018. ● Impact to the City: Under the City’s fee increase approved on May 19, 2020, this would increase the fee to $7,574 per apartment dwelling unit and $7,899 per 1000 square feet of commercial. Based on an estimated 333 dwelling units or 104,000 of commercial in RPSP District B, the total cost of this amendment (difference between the prior fee and the new fee) is approximately:
o Full residential build-out $294,705 in waived revenue. o Full commercial build-out $139,256 increase in revenue.

6. Set the City’s Drainage Impact Fee rate:

A request to lock in the September 24, 2018 Drainage Impact Fee. The City’s drainage fee provides funding to mitigate new developments impact on the storm drain system.
● Original DA Provision: Limitation on increase of certain fees for five years after January 4, 2006, the City at the rate in effect as of the Effective Date. The original DA fixed the fees for a period of 5 years, with that being extended an additional 5 years under the First DAA.
560
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

● Proposed DA Provision: This amendment to Section would lock the existing drainage impact fee to the fees in effect on September 24, 2018. ● Impact to the City: Under the City’s fee increase approved on May 19, 2020, this would increase the fee to $29,237 per gross acre of lot area for Medium and High Density Residential, Commercial, Office, Hotel, Industrial. Based on an estimate the total cost of this amendment (difference between the prior fee and the new fee) is approximately $61,758.00 in waived revenue.

7. Credit toward the new Mobility Fee:

A request to provide credit toward the Mobility fee for the reasonable cost of design, engineering, land, and construction cost of the public bicycle and pedestrian facilities constructed as part of the RPSP buildout that haven’t been used to offset other required fees. The Mobility fee was recommended in the City’s 2011 Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities Master Plan and is intended to support the City effort to improve the bicycle and pedestrian network.
● Original DA Provision: The Mobility fee is a new fee and therefore was not discussed in the DA.
● Proposed DA Provision: The DAA would allow the Developer to pay an alternative Mobility Fee based on the project density. Based on the average density of the added residential units of 1.71 persons per residential unit the adjusted Mobility Fee for the Multi Family residential would be $1,347.05. The amendment would also provide a credit toward the new Mobility fee for the remaining 333 units. The credit is based on the fact that RiverPark has developed approximately 2.5 miles of Class 1 bike lanes and 4 miles of Class II bike lanes.

City staff or a mutually agreed upon third party consultant shall be used to verify any costs used to obtain any fee credits. The value of these improvements would be distributed among the remaining developments
● Impact to the City: Under the City’s fee increase approved on May 19, 2020, this new fee would have cost the Developer $2,245 per dwelling or $1,146 per 1,000 square feet of commercial. Based on an estimated 333 remaining dwelling units or the remaining 104,000 of commercial in RPSP District B, the total cost of this amendment is approximately $747,585 or $119,184 in waived revenue, for the residential or commercial, respectively.

8. Public Art Fee:
● Original DA Provision: : Public Art was not addressed in the DA ● Proposed DA Provision: Developer shall have the option of either paying a public art fee or providing art onsite equal in value to the public art fee set forth in full satisfaction of the City’s public art requirements and City Council Resolution 14,124. Developers shall maintain public art installations on the Site in perpetuity, if installed.
● Impact to the City: This request would result in public art being installed in the City, but it would not result in a fiscal impact to the City. 561
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

9. Affordable Housing Requirements:
● Original DA Provision: Affordable housing was not addressed in the Original DA, since housing was not proposed on this site.
● Proposed DA Provision: All new residential projects developed in the Riverpark Commercial Area (RPSP District B) after the date of this Second Amendment containing ten or more dwelling units to be offered for rent shall include a number of dwelling units equal to not less than 15% of the total number of dwelling units in the project offered for rent at the following levels: 5% shall be rented at an affordable rent to persons and families of very-low income, 5% shall be rented at an affordable rent to persons and families of lower income, and 5% shall be rented at an affordable rent to persons and families of moderate income, as defined in California Health and Safety Code Sections 50105, 50079.5, 50093, respectively.

Upon construction of the for-rent Affordable Housing Units for Very Low, Low, and Moderate Income Households each such unit shall be rented at rents that are Affordable to Very Low, Low, or Moderate Income Households for a period of fifty-five (55) years.
● Impact to the City: The amendment would result in the construction of an additional 50 affordable housing units in District B.

10. Maintenance Agreement for Access Road with Caltrans:
● Original DA Provision: An off-site maintenance agreement for access road with Caltrans was not addressed in the DA.
● Proposed DA Provision: Developer agrees to enter into a maintenance agreement for the access drive and road located just north of US 101 and to the East of Ventura Boulevard with the City.
● Impact to the City: The Developer, not the City, would be financially responsible for the upkeep of the access road.

7. Development Advisory Committee: The proposed DAA did not require review by the Development Advisory Committee (DAC). However, the DAC reviewed the associated proposed SPA on June 3, 2021, and December 16, 2020. The comments from the DAC have been incorporated into the SPA and Addendum, including the studies, to the FEIR.

8. Community Workshop: The DAA is not a development application and therefore does not require a Community Workshop. However, a Community Workshop on the SPA and 333 unit apartment project was held on August 17, 2020. Public notice signs were posted in the three locations corresponding with the proposed land use changes and Fore Apartments project site. Notifications were mailed to the RiverPark Neighborhood. Approximately 2,000 notices were mailed. The meeting was held online due to the COVID-19 meeting restrictions.

Sixteen members of the community attended this meeting, and three people spoke on the items. The video from the online workshop was also posted on the City’s website for 562
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021

members of the public to view separately. The primary concern identified at the Community Workshop walkability and the connectivity of potential housing in District B to other resources. While District B, is on the periphery, there will be a variety of commercial uses within close proximity. New Urbanist principles generally define walking distances as ¼ to ½ mile, which is a five to ten minute walk. In addition to the commercial development proposed at the Landing, many of the stores within the Collection are also within ½ mile.

Other than those concerns, the comments were generally supportive of the Project introduction of housing, and a recognition of the need for more housing.

Consistent with public noticing requirements, the Planning Commission Hearing was advertised with on-site postings and by mail to property owners within 300 feet of the project site. To date, Planning Staff has received one written comment but no other inquiries from the public regarding the proposed Project. The written comment is provided as Attachment F.

9. Appeal Procedure: The requested actions for the DAA are recommendations to the City Council. As the Planning Commission does not take formal action, but recommends an action to the City Council, an Appeal procedure is not necessary. All aspects of this Project shall not become effective unless and until the City Council approves the Development Agreement.

Attachments:

A. Maps (Vicinity, General Plan, and Zoning Maps)
B. Second Development Agreement Amendment
C. Addendum No. 15 to the FEIR No. 00-03
D. FEIR No. 00-03 and Subsequent Addendums
E. General Plan Consistency Chart
F. Written Comments Received
G. Resolution Recommending Approval for Second DAA
H. Staff Presentation
563
A. Maps
(Vicinity, General Plan, and Zoning Maps)
564
PZ 20-670-03

FIFTH ST H ST
C ST

VENTURA RD

OXNARD BLVD

RICE AVE

HUENEME RD
J ST

GONZALES RD

VINEYARD AVE

WOOLEY RD

BARD RD
101 FRWY

SAVIERS RD

DORIS AVE

CENTRAL AVE

ROSE AVE

CASPER RD

THIRD ST
23RD AVE

CAMINO DEL SOL
D ST

BRISTOL RD

ARNOLD RD

NINTH ST

OLIVAS PARK DR

WEST RD

NAUMAN RD

TEAL CLUB RD

PERIMETER RD

HARBOR BLVD

MARKET ST
G ST
OCEAN
DR
T
B ST RACK 13 RD

OLDS RD
32ND AVE

YUCCA ST

DEL NORTE BLVD

PATTERSON RD

CHANNEL ISLANDS BLVD

VICTORIA AVE
ELM ST

PERKINS RD

ETTING RD
F ST

PACIFIC AVE
5TH PL

PALMA DR
6TH ST

SANTA CLARA AVE
N ST

ENTRADA DR

CLARA ST

WALKER ST

WALNUT DR

BALBOA ST

DUNKIRK DR

SIMON WAY

ORANGE DR
5TH ST

EMERSON AVE

JOLIET PL
ALLEY

EBONY DR

KENTIA ST

HILL ST
I ST

SAN JUAN AVE

PATRICIA ST
A ST

VENTURA BLVD

EASTMAN AVE
TRACK 14 RD

REDWOOD ST GISLER AVE

FIR AVE
M ST

TERESA ST

PENINSULA RD

OFFSHORE ST

AZALEA ST

VICTORIA AV
11TH AVE

WILLIAMS DR

HARBOR SERVICE
BLVD
DONLON
ST

APPLE LN
LEI DR

STATHAM BLVD

LATIGO AVE

ARCTURUS AVE
K ST

BUTLER RD

SURFSIDE DR

SWAN ST

NINA DR GARY DR

STURGIS RD

MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE
E ST

SAN MATEO PL

SIKORSKY ST

JANETWOOD DR
ASH ST
DOCK 1

JOAN WAY

BEAUMONT AVE

PAVIN DR

NELSON PL

OXFORD DR

HOLLY AVE

VENICE RD WESTAR DR

MANDALAY
BEACH
RD

AVILA PL

BLANCA PL

VIEWPOINT DR

CAMINO AVE

BAYVIEW DR
ELBA
ST

SCOTT ST

OCEAN DR
B ST
M ST
ALLEY
101 FRWY

PATTERSON RD

VICTORIA AVE

CHANNEL ISLANDS BLVD

GONZALES RD

R CI E AVE
ALLEY

ETTING RD
F ST
C ST
HARBOR
BLVD
Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles
North
Pacific Ocean
N
November 29. 2021
Oxnard Planning
1:70,000
Santa Clara River
PZ 20-670-03
Location: 2700, 2750 W Ventura Rd
APN: 1320100095, 1320100085
FORE DA Amendment
Vicinity Map
565
AG
CR
RMH
PRK
ESM

VENTURA RD
101 FWY SOUTH
101 FWY NORTH
SB 101 OFF RAMP
NB 101 ON RAMP
ALLEY null

TOWN CENTER DR

WAGON WHEEL RD
SB 101 OFF RAMP
n
ull
SADDLE
ST
null null
OXFORD FLAT CONDOS null

WAGON WHEEL RD

WAGON WHEEL RD
SB 101 OFF RAMP
2030 General Plan Land Use Map
0 75 150 300
Feet
2030 General Plan Land Use Map
November 30, 2021 1:3,000
Oxnard Planning
PZ 20-670-03
Location: 2700, 2750 W Ventura Rd
APN: 1320100095, 1320100085
FORE DA Amendment
CR
566

VENTURA RD
101 FWY NORTH
101 FWY SOUTH
SB 101 OFF RAMP
ALLEY
NB 101 ON RAMP

WAGON WHEEL RD
TOWN
CENTER
DR
SB 101 OFF RAMP

WAGON WHEEL RD
CNTY
SPLAN
CO
H
CC/H
RO
P/OS
PS
Zoning/Specific Plan Map
Zoning/Specific Plan Map
0 50 100 200 300 400
Feet
November 30, 2021 1:3,000
Oxnard Planning
PZ 20-670-03
Location: 2700, 2750 W Ventura Rd
APN: 1320100095, 1320100085
FORE DA Amendment
R/O
567

N VENTURA RD
101 FWY NORTH
101 FWY SOUTH
NB 101 ON RAMP
Aerial Map
Aerial Map
November 30, 2021
Oxnard Planning
0 25 50 100 150 200
Feet
PZ 20-670-03
Location: 2700, 2750 W Ventura Rd
APN: 1320100095, 1320100085
FORE DA Amendment
568
ATTACHMENT E - City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan Consistency Analysis Fore Property DA Amendment
December 16, 2021 Planning Commission
Level I: Direct Applicability to a Proposed Policy, Project or Program Level II: Related or Indirect Applicability to the Proposed Policy, Project, or Program Level III: No or Distance Applicability to the Proposed Policy, Project, or Program.

All polices not listed are designated as Level III are deemed consistent with the 2030 General Plan.

General Plan Chapter Abbreviations Chapter:

SC: Sustainable Community 2
CD: Community Development 3
ICS: Infrastructure and Community Services 4
ER: Environmental Resources 5
SH: Safety and Hazards 6
MC: Military Compatibility 7
HE: 2021-2029 Housing Element 8
2030 General Plan Level I Level II Rationale
Policy
CD-1.2
Infill Development, Priority to Mixed Use:

Promote the efficient use of larger vacant parcels and vacant areas of the City by encouraging infill development, with a priority to mixed uses that reduce vehicle trips and GHG emissions and promote sustainable development goals and objectives The DAA facilitates future
mixed use and residential
development within a specific
plan on infill property, as
opposed to locating such
development on farmland.

The placement of housing
within the Urban Village area
helps to reduce trips by
placing people in close
proximity to commercial
needs.
569
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021
Attachment E

Policy
CD-1.5
Housing Variety
Promote the development of a variety of housing types throughout the City including apartments, condominiums, lofts, townhouses, and attached and detached single family units.

X The project promotes
development of the
RiverPark Specific Plan, which
includes a variety of housing
choices.

Policy
CD-1.7
Compact Development
Promote the use of development patterns that are more compactly built and use space in an efficient aesthetic manner as part of the community vision.

X Project promotes high density
development in the Urban
Village setting.

Policy
CD-1.9 and

1.10 Commute Reduction and Jobs-Housing Balance:

Minimize the commuting distances between residential concentrations and employment centers by encouraging the development of mixed land uses in appropriate areas. And Consider the effects of land use proposals and decisions on efforts to maintain an appropriate jobs-housing balance ratio.

X The Project facilitates future
development of mixed use and
residential development within
the RiverPark Specific Plan,
which is in close proximity to the
multiple office park areas and
other commercial businesses
within RiverPark and along
Oxnard Boulevard.

Policy
CD-3.3
Innovative Redevelopment
Promote innovative design flexibility and possibly different residential densities in public and public/private redevelopment within existing neighborhoods through the use of alternative performance-oriented development standards, alternative development designs, development agreements, specific plans, mixed uses, and other development and planning techniques.

X The DAA will promote the
continued development of
the RiverPark Specific Plan
area.

Policy
CD-7.1
Establishment of Urban Villages
Six areas of the City are initially designated as Urban Villages. A specific plan for each area shall be prepared in advance of implementing an Urban Village in a specific authorized location. Additional Urban Villages and guidelines may be subsequently adopted by the City Council. Urban Villages shall be characterized by:
● Infill and/or development of formerly agricultural land ● Reinvestment in the existing community
● Mixture of land uses
● Mix of residential densities and housing types
X The project site is within the
North Oxnard Transit
Enhancement District
(Noted) urban village. The
DAA will require a minimum
of 15 percent affordable
housing for any additional
units and will support the
construction of compact

570
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021
Attachment E

● Providing a minimum of 15 percent affordable housing
● Location along or near corridors, downtown, and transit nodes ● Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle circulation given high priority development within the
Urban Village area.

Policy
CD-8.5
Impact Mitigation
Ensure that new development avoids or mitigates impacts on air quality, traffic congestion, noise, and environmental resources to the maximum extent feasible.

X All mitigation measures from
the FEIR will continue to be
applicable to all projects
developed under the Specific
Plan.

Policy
ICS-1.2
Development Impacts to Existing Infrastructure
Review development proposals for their impacts on infrastructure (i.e., sewer, water, fire stations, libraries, streets) and require appropriate mitigation measures to ensure that proposed developments do not create substantial adverse impacts on existing infrastructure and that the necessary infrastructure will be in place to support the development.

X
Future development on the site
will also pay a range of required
impact fees to the City, County,
and school districts. The
original DA addressed
dedication of land for parks
funding towards a fire station
and other public facilities.

Policy
ICS-1.3
Funding for Public Facilities
Continue to utilize developer fees, public facilities fees, and other methods (i.e., grant funding or assessment districts) to finance public facility design, construction, operation, and maintenance.

X
Policy
ICS-1.4
Infrastructure Conditions of Approval New development should not be approved unless:
● The applicant demonstrates adequate public services and facilities are available; ● Infrastructure improvements incorporate a range of feasible measures that can be implemented to reduce all public safety and/or environmental impacts associated with the construction, operation, or maintenance of any required improvement;
● Infrastructure improvements are consistent with City infrastructure master plans; and
● Required infrastructure needed for future new development is self-funded.

The DA as amended ensures that
the infrastructure needed for
future development is
self-funded.

571
Fore Development Agreement Amendment No. 2 (PZ 20-670-03) Planning Commission Hearing Date: December 16, 2021
Attachment E

Policy
H-2.1
Adequate Development Opportunities
Designate sufficient sites for residential development with densities of 30 dwelling units per acre (du/acre) or greater to accommodate projects that cumulatively meet or exceed the lower income category of the RHNA allocation.

X The DAA will promote
the development of
the required affordable
housing that will be
used to meet the City’s
RHNA requirements,
this housing type will
meet the growing need
for affordable by
design workforce
housing.

Policy
H-2.2
Balanced Opportunities
Provide opportunities to the private and public sectors to produce housing that meets the needs of special needs, extremely low-, very low-, low-, moderate-, and above moderate-income housing to achieve a balanced community.

X
Policy
H-3.4
Inclusionary Housing Program
Continue the Inclusionary Housing Program that requires new housing developments to reserve a portion of units for lower-income households or make a payment into the City’s in-lieu fee program.

X Per the DAA, the
project will be
required to have a 15
percent inclusionary
requirement.

572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
Addendum No. 15
to the
River Park Project
Final Environmental Impact Report
State Clearinghouse No. 2000051046
PREPARED FOR:

City of Oxnard
214 South C Street
Oxnard, California 93030
PREPARED BY:

Westlake Village
920 Hampshire Road, Suite A5
Westlake Village, CA 91361
Los Angeles
706 S. Hill Street, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90014
December 2021
592
City of Oxnard RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants i December 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page

1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1.0-1

1.1 Purpose of an Addendum.............................................................................................1.0-1

1.2 Background ................................................................................................................... 1.0-2

2.0 Project Description .................................................................................................................... 2.0-1

2.1 Adopted RiverPark Specific Plan...................................................................................2.0-1

2.2 Current Status of Development in RiverPark................................................................2.0-4

2.3 Proposed Specific Plan Amendment.............................................................................2.0-5

3.0 Impact Analysis.......................................................................................................................... 3.0-1

3.1 Land Use........................................................................................................................ 3.0-1

3.2 Aesthetics...................................................................................................................... 3.0-4

3.3 Earth Resources............................................................................................................ 3.0-7

3.4 Biological Resources ..................................................................................................... 3.0-9

3.5 Water Resources.........................................................................................................3.0-10

3.6 Transportation and Circulation...................................................................................3.0-12

3.7 Agricultural Resources................................................................................................3.0-19

3.8 Air Quality ................................................................................................................... 3.0-20

3.9 Noise ........................................................................................................................... 3.0-28

3.10 Public Schools .............................................................................................................3.0-30

3.11 Fire Protection ............................................................................................................3.0-35

3.12 Police Protection.........................................................................................................3.0-37

3.13 Parks and Recreation ..................................................................................................3.0-39

3.14 Solid Waste Management...........................................................................................3.0-40

3.15 Library Services...........................................................................................................3.0-43

3.16 Stormwater Drainage..................................................................................................3.0-44

3.17 Water Supply and Distribution ...................................................................................3.0-46

3.18 Wastewater Service ....................................................................................................3.0-49

3.19 Energy ......................................................................................................................... 3.0-51

3.20 Cultural Resources......................................................................................................3.0-53

3.21 Hazards ....................................................................................................................... 3.0-54

3.22 Wildfire ....................................................................................................................... 3.0-55

3.23 Tribal Cultural Resources............................................................................................3.0-56 Appendices
A Traffic Memos
B Air Emissions Calculations
C Energy
593
City of Oxnard RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants ii December 2021
List of Figures
Figure Page
1 Regional Location....................................................................................................................... 1.0-3 2 Project Vicinity Map................................................................................................................... 1.0-4 3 Adopted Land Use Plan—Permitted Uses .................................................................................2.0-2 4 Adopted Land Use Summary by Planning District .....................................................................2.0-3 5 Proposed Land Use Plan—Permitted Uses................................................................................2.0-9 6 Proposed Land Use Summary by Planning District..................................................................2.0-10 7 Proposed Massing Diagram ....................................................................................................... 3.0-6 List of Tables
Table Page
1 Residential and Commercial Development Status by District ...................................................2.0-4 2 Proposed Specific Plan Amendment Land Use Summary..........................................................2.0-5 3 Proposed Land Use Changes by District.....................................................................................2.0-6 4 Average Household Size...........................................................................................................2.0-12 5 Residential and Commercial Reductions Scenarios................................................................. 2.0-13 6 Trip Generation Comparison for Adopted Specific Plan and Proposed Amendment .............3.0-14 7 Intersection Operating Conditions Comparative Analysis Signalized Intersections................3.0-15 8 Development Scenario Comparative Summary – Trip Generation .........................................3.0-16 9 Maximum Daily Unmitigated Operational Emissions..............................................................3.0-22 10 GHG Emission Comparisons.....................................................................................................3.0-25 11 Rio School District Student Generation ...................................................................................3.0-32 12 Rio School District Classroom Capacities.................................................................................3.0-32 13 Oxnard Union High School District Student Generation..........................................................3.0-33 14 Oxnard Union High School District Classroom Capacities .......................................................3.0-33 15 Construction Solid Waste Generation .....................................................................................3.0-41 16 Operational Solid Waste Generation .......................................................................................3.0-42 17 Estimated Water Demand .......................................................................................................3.0-48 18 Estimated Wastewater Generation .........................................................................................3.0-50 19 Electricity Demand................................................................................................................... 3.0-52 20 Natural Gas Demand................................................................................................................ 3.0-53 594
City of Oxnard 1.0-1 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

1.0 INTRODUCTION
This is the fifteenth Addendum to the certified Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) for the RiverPark Project. This introduction describes the background of the planning and environmental review process for the RiverPark Project and the purpose and organization of this Addendum with respect to analyzing the environmental impacts of a proposed amendment to the adopted Specific Plan.

1.1 PURPOSE OF AN ADDENDUM
When a Final EIR has been certified for a project, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines define standards and the procedure for additional environmental review. Sections 15162–15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines define the standards for determining the level of additional environmental review required when an EIR has been certified for a project.

When it can be determined that neither the proposed changes to the project, changed circumstances, nor new information results in the identification of new significant impacts, or the substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts identified in the certified EIR, an Addendum to an EIR may be prepared.

Public review of an Addendum is not required by CEQA. If new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of significant impacts identified in the previous EIR would result, then preparation and circulation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR for additional public review is required.

This Addendum to the Final EIR for the RiverPark Project has been prepared because:

1. No substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the occurrence of new significant effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts;

2. No substantial changes in circumstances under which the project is undertaken will occur that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the occurrence of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects; and

3. No new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was prepared shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR;
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or d. Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. 595

1.0 Introduction
City of Oxnard 1.0-2 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
The analysis of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment in this Addendum supports the conclusion that neither the proposed changes to the amount and location of residential and commercial uses allowed by the Specific Plan or changes to the circumstances under which the RiverPark community will continue to develop will result in any new significant impacts nor any substantial increase in the severity of any of the significant impacts identified in the Final EIR. Additionally, no new information of substantial importance has been identified that indicates the Specific Plan Amendment as currently proposed would result in any new significant impacts nor any substantial increase in the severity of the significant impacts identified in the Final EIR.

This Addendum provides an update to the environmental information in the Final EIR, analysis of the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and presents a comparison of the environmental impacts of this proposal with the impacts identified in the Final EIR.

This Addendum provides the following information for each environmental topic addressed in the original EIR: First, a summary of impacts identified in the Final EIR is provided. This is followed by an analysis of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, and a comparison with the impacts identified in the Final EIR.

This analysis includes, where applicable, discussion of the City’s updated 2030 General Plan as well as other new City, State, or local plans and regulations, and.

Following this introduction, the background of the RiverPark Specific Plan project is described. This background section is followed by a description of the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan. The environmental analysis follows the project description section.

1.2 BACKGROUND
RiverPark is an integrated mixed-use community of residences, commercial uses, parks, schools, civic uses, and supporting infrastructure. As shown in Figure 1: Regional Location, the 702-acre RiverPark Specific Plan Area is located immediately north of the Ventura Freeway (US 101) between the Santa Clara River and Vineyard Avenue (State Route 232) in Oxnard. Figure 2: Project Vicinity Map shows the boundaries of the RiverPark Specific Plan Area and its location in the City of Oxnard (City).

Development of RiverPark is guided and regulated by the RiverPark Specific Plan and several related implementation agreements, including the RiverPark Development Agreement (DA) and the RiverPark Owner Participation Agreement (OPA). The RiverPark Project EIR was prepared and certified by the City to meet the requirements for environmental review under CEQA.

The RiverPark Project EIR addressed a series of related discretionary actions that made up the Project, including a General Plan Amendment, adoption of the Specific Plan, and annexation of a portion of the site. In addition, the RiverPark Project EIR addressed several agreements related to the implementation of the Project, including the DA between the City and the applicants and the OPA between the Oxnard Community Development Commission and the applicants for the portion of the Specific Plan Area located within the City’s Historic Enhancement and Revitalization of Oxnard (HERO) Redevelopment Project Area. 596

HOLLYWOOD-BY-THE-SEA

HOLLYWOOD-BEACH

SILVER STRAND

PORT HUENEME

POINT MUGU
OXNARD

NYELAND ACRES

CAMARILLO

LAKE SHERWOOD

VENTU PARK

THOUSAND OAKS

SANTA SUSANA SIMI VALLEY

MOORPARK ACRES

MOORPARK
SOMIS

SATICOY

SANTA PAULA

BARDSVALE

FILLMORE

BUCKHORN
PIRU
SUMMIT
OJAI

MIRA MONTE

WHEELER SPRINGS

OAKVIEW

CASITAS SPRINGS

FOSTER PARK

LA CONCHITA

SEA CLIFF

VENTURA
33 33
150 150
126
126
23 23
23 34
118
118
1 1
34 101

NEWBURY PARK
LOS
PADRES

NATIONAL
FOREST

LOCKWOOD VALLEY

LAKE-OF-THE-WOODS

FRAZIER PARK KERN COUNTY KERN COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

ANGELES

NATIONAL
FOREST

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY
5 PACIFIC OCEAN

PROJECT

LOCATION
Sespe
Condor
Sanctuary
101

VENTURA COUNTY

VENTURA COUNTY

LOS ANGELES COUNTY

VENTURA COUNTY

VENTURA COUNTY
Regional Location
FIGURE 1
265-001-19
SOURCE: RiverPark Project, FEIR - June 2010

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN MILES
0 5 10 20
N
597
Santa
Clar a
River
126
101

STURGIS RD RICE AVE

DBLV ORTEN DEL
Point Mugu
Naval Air Station
U.S.

Naval Base
Ventura County
Port Hueneme

ETTING RD
R

D CASPER R

STURGIS RD

RDRA ENTUV

OXNARD AIRPORT

VINEYARD AVE

DR FFLO W
NAVA

PERIMETER RD

D HAILES R

VICTORIA AVE

OLDS RD

TEAL CLUB RD
11TH ST

BEACH RD

BRISTOL RD
TI S
101 FWY

SPINNAKER DR
8TH ST

E AVICIFCAP

HILL RD
EVA ST

TELEPHONE RD

POLI ST
L AVE

MILLS RD
TC S

PALMA DR
TS J

MAIN ST

COLLINS ST

BUNSEN AVE
TSF
126 FRWY
I ST

RICE AVE

AVE ROSE ROSE AVE

HARBOR BL

LOS ANGELES AVE

OXNARD BL

L B DARNOX

OXNARD BL

CASPER RD PERIMETER R
H ST
H ST
101 FRWY
101 FRWY

C ST C ST HUENEME RD

VE A RICE

DR D LONR A

HUENEME RD

CHANNEL ISLAND BLVD

CHANNEL ISLAND BLVD

FIFTH ST

GONZALES RD GONZALES RD

PLEASANT VALLEY RD

PLEASANT VALLEY RD

BARD RD

VINEYARD AVE

VINEYARD AVE

AVEECIR

D BLV NORTE DEL

FIFTH ST

RDSRIEV AS

WOOLEY RD WOOLEY RD NTURA RD EV

ROSE AVE

SANTA CLARA AVE

CENTRAL AVE

DR NOSRETTAP

E VA ICTORIA V
Oxnard Planning Area
Oxnard Planning Area
Oxnard Planning Area
Oxnard Planning Area
City of Ventura
City
of
Port
Hueneme
Oxnard
P a c i f i c
O c e a n
Project Vicinity Map
FIGURE 2
265-001-19
SOURCE: City of Oxnard Planning Department - March 2010

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN MILES

10.50 2
N
Oxnard Sphere of Influence (2010)
Oxnard City Limits
Oxnard Planning Area of Interest/Planning Area
Specific Plan Area
Oxnard Airport Sphere of Influence
City Urban Restriction Boundary
CURB (1998)
Coastal Zone Boundary
LEGEND
598

1.0 Introduction
City of Oxnard 1.0-5 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
The Oxnard City Council certified the Final EIR and approved the RiverPark Specific Plan and the related agreements on August 27, 2002. Development of RiverPark began in May 2004 and continues to this date.

The Specific Plan has been the subject of several minor administrative amendments since the original adoption. Errata documents have been prepared for the Specific Plan to document these approved specific plan amendments and correct minor inconsistencies in the text and graphic exhibits within the Specific Plan as they have been identified during implementation of the Project. In addition, there have been minor amendments to the OPA and other agreements related to the implementation of the RiverPark Project. For each of these modifications of the RiverPark Project, an Addendum to the Final EIR was prepared by the City in accordance with CEQA. Addendums to the Final EIR were also prepared to address minor changes to the construction of the Project during the land development phase and minor revisions to the mitigation measures for the air quality impacts of the Project to reflect changes in the planning of the main commercial area. A summary of the previous Addendums is provided below:
• Addendum 1 – August 2002: The RiverPark Project, as described and analyzed in the RiverPark Final EIR, included a proposal for temporary dewatering of limited areas during grading activities. This Addendum addressed a minor change to the dewatering plan to include a second location for a dewatering well.
• Addendum 2 – September 2002: This Addendum evaluated an amendment to include regulations for temporary uses.
• Addendum 3 – January 2004: This Addendum evaluated a minor amendment to the Specific Plan to change the land use designation on a small parcel from Open Space to Commercial. • Addendum 4 – November 2005: The RiverPark Specific Plan, as described and analyzed in the RiverPark Final EIR, included a conceptual grading plan for the entire Specific Plan Area. This conceptual grading plan identified a total of 10 million cubic yards of cut and fill of earth materials on the Project site. It was anticipated that the grading operations would be a balanced operation, requiring no import or export of earth materials, based on the soil characteristics identified in the geotechnical report prepared for the Project site. During the initial mass grading of the site, it was determined that soil compression was higher than anticipated. In addition, implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR required removal and recompacting of soil at depths greater than the conceptual grading plan. As a result, soil needed to be imported to balance grading on the site. This Addendum assessed the environmental effects of importing of up to 600,000 cubic yards of soil.
• Addendum 5 – June 2007: This Addendum addressed an amendment to the Owner Participation Agreement to permit the hotel allowed in District C to be developed in District D on a 5-acre site on the southeast corner of Oxnard Boulevard and Danvers River Street and allow up to 100,000 square feet of retail commercial development on the 12-acre site in Planning District C where the hotel was originally allowed in the Specific Plan.
• Addendum 6 – June 2007: This Addendum addressed minor changes to the mitigation measures for air quality impacts included in the Final EIR to reflect the planning of the retail commercial project, The Collection at RiverPark, planned in Planning Districts B, C, and D as identified in the RiverPark Specific Plan.
599

1.0 Introduction
City of Oxnard 1.0‐6 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants   December 2021
 Addendum 7 – November 2007: This Addendum addressed an amendment to the Owner Participation Agreement and an amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Oxnard Community Development Commission (CDC) and the applicants related to financing of public infrastructure, parking facilities, and improvements in support of commercial development in RiverPark, including a 500‐space parking structure within the primary commercial district, Planning District D, of the RiverPark Specific Plan.
 Addendum 8 – December 2007: This Addendum addressed an amendment to the RiverPark Specific Plan to allow changing the amount of residential development allowed on the remaining land in Planning District A (Mixed Use/Office District) and Planning District F (Vineyards Neighborhood District).
 Addendum 9 – February 2009: This Addendum addressed a minor amendment to the RiverPark Specific Plan to one (1) freeway oriented sign, not to exceed 60 feet in height, in one of three designated locations in the main commercial district, Planning District D.  Addendum 10 – July 2009: This Addendum evaluated the addition of an administrative office and maintenance facility for the City General Services Department in Planning District E as defined in the RiverPark Specific Plan.
 Addendum 11 – January 2010: This Addendum evaluated the impacts of the Ventura Road Utilities Project for the City Public Works Department, which proposed infrastructure improvements under Ventura Road between Gonzales Road and Vineyard Avenue.  Addendum 12 – June 2011: This Addendum evaluated a proposed amendment to the uses allowed by the RiverPark Specific Plan in Districts A and D. The amendment proposed an increase in the maximum number of residential units from 2,805 to 3,145 units with a corresponding reduction in the amount of commercial development allowed from 2,485,000 to 2,078,000 square feet. This proposed amendment was considered by the Planning Commission and City Council in June 2012. The City Council approved an increase in the maximum number of residential units allowed from 2,805 to 3,043 residential units and a decrease in the amount of commercial development from 2,485,000 to 2,098,000 square feet.
 Addendum 13 – March 2011: An amendment to the signage standards in Section 5.9.3.3 of the specific plan allowed three freeway‐oriented monument signs up to 20 feet tall, in designated locations within District D as defined in the RiverPark Specific Plan. In addition, the specific plan amendment allowed changeable electronic display panels on the pylon sign subject to approval of a Special Use Permit. The locations of these signs are shown on the revised Exhibit 5.HH, which was incorporated into the specific plan. This Addendum and the amendment to the signage standards in the specific plan were prepared and approved during the period that Addendum 12 was still under preparation.0
 Addendum 14 – January 2016: This Addendum evaluated an amendment to the RiverPark Specific Plan to transfer retail commercial development from District E to C, increase the amount of commercial development in District C, and allow a freeway oriented sign up to a maximum of 60 feet.

The maximum amount of commercial development allowed by the RiverPark Specific Plan was not changed as a result of this amendment.
600
City of Oxnard 2.0-1 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed amendment to the RiverPark Specific Plan (Specific Plan Amendment) would provide an option to allow the development of an additional 1,025 multifamily residential units in three of the commercial mixed-use districts in the southern portion of the Specific Plan Area. If these additional residential units are developed, the amount of commercial development currently permitted by the Adopted Specific Plan in these Districts would be reduced by 562,000 square feet. The addition of a Residential: Very High land use category is also proposed to allow the development of the additional residential units. This new land use designation would be applied to three locations in Districts B, C, and D as defined in the RiverPark Specific Plan. This development of additional residential units could occur in any or all of these three districts under the proposed amendment. New development standards are also proposed for multifamily development that would be allowed by this category.

2.1 ADOPTED RIVERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN
The RiverPark Specific Plan permits the development of an integrated mixed-use community consisting of open space, residential, commercial, and public facilities. The design of the RiverPark community follows the design principles of the New Urbanism and Smart Growth movements, which emphasize the importance of mixed land uses, communities scaled for pedestrian movement, limiting automobile usage, and physical design in creating communities in which people want to live, work, and shop. The RiverPark community is made up of four basic land uses: (1) the commercial area within the southern portion of RiverPark; (2) the residential neighborhoods to the north and east of the commercial areas; (3) the open space areas in the northern portion of the Specific Plan Area; and (4) public facilities located throughout the community. These land uses are linked and unified by a landscaped pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular circulation system. Figure 3: Adopted Land Use Plan—Permitted Uses presents the Land Use Plan for the Specific Plan.

Figure 4: Adopted Land Use Summary by Planning District presents the land use summary by planning district, which describes the type and maximum intensity of allowed land uses. The Specific Plan established 13 planning districts to regulate the location and configuration of the planned land uses. Each planning district has a specific range of permitted and specially permitted land uses, densities, parking requirements, and other development standards. The RiverPark Specific Plan currently allows the development of up to 3,043 residential units and 2,098,000 square feet of commercial development.

The Specific Plan identified sites for two new elementary (K–5) schools and one new intermediate (6–8) school; new City and County of Ventura Fire Stations; and neighborhood parks and community open space. The Specific Plan also facilitated the reclamation of the existing mine pits located in the northern portion of the Specific Plan Area and allows the reclaimed mine pits to be used as water storage and recharge basins as part of ongoing groundwater management efforts. 601
Adopted Land Use Plan—Permitted Uses
FIGURE 3
093-001-15
SOURCE: Di Cecco Architecture, Inc. – August 2012

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
0 800 1600 3200
N
602
Adopted Land Use Summary by Planning District
FIGURE 4
SOURCE: Di Cecco Architecture, Inc. – August 2012
265-001-19
603

2.0 Project Description
City of Oxnard 2.0-4 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

2.2 CURRENT STATUS OF DEVELOPMENT IN RIVERPARK
Development of the RiverPark Community began in May 2004. As shown in Table 1: Residential and Commercial Development Status by District, the current Specific Plan, as amended in June 2012, allows development of up to 3,043 residential units and 2,098,000 square feet of commercial space in Districts A-M as defined in the approved Specific Plan. The amount of residential and commercial development approved and built in each district is shown below in Table 1.

Table 1
Residential and Commercial Development Status by District Permitted by
Approved
Specific Plan
Approved
and Built to
date
Amount of
Remaining
Development
Permitted
Permitted by
Approved
Specific Plan
Approved
and Built to
date
Amount of
Remaining
Development
Permitted
District Commercial (sq ft.) Residential (units)
A 456,000 356,483 99,517 440 400 40
B 104,000 0 104,000 0 0 0
C 478,000 257,733 220,267 0 0 0
D 904,000 812,060 91,940 512 512 0
E 111,000 21,066 89,934 0 0 0
F 5,000 0 5,000 468 468 0
G 15,000 0 15,000 415 415 0
H 0 0 0 486 486 0
I 10,000 0 10,000 477 477 0
J 10,000 0 10,000 158 158 0
K 5,000 0 5,000 87 87 0
L 0 0 0 0 0 0
M 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2,098,000 1,447,342 650,658 3,043 3,003 40

Source: Meridian Consultants, LLC., 2021
604

2.0 Project Description
City of Oxnard 2.0-5 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Of the 3,043 residential units permitted by the approved Specific Plan, 3,003 units have been approved and built, including 447 affordable housing units. As shown in Table 1, the approved Specific Plan permits the development of 40 additional units in District A. At the time the Specific Plan was adopted, there was 421,000 square feet of existing commercial office space within Planning District A. When this existing office space is added to the amount of commercial space permitted Specific Plan as adopted, the total amount of commercial space developed within the Specific Plan Area is 1,447,342 square feet. Since approval of the RiverPark Specific Plan, commercial development has occurred in Districts A, B, D and E.

The approved Specific Plan permits the development of an additional 650,658 square feet of commercial uses in Districts A, B, C, D, F, G, I, J and K as shown in Table 1.

Schools
Three schools have been built in the RiverPark Specific Plan Area by the Rio School District: Rio del Mar Elementary School, Rio Vista Middle School, and the Rio Del Sol K-8 STEAM Academy. The Rio del Mar Elementary and Rio Vista Middle Schools are in Planning District J along Vineyard Avenue, and the Rio Del Sol STEAM Academy is in Planning District G along N. Ventura Road.

Fire Facilities
The RiverPark Specific Plan designated a site for a new fire station to provide service in the northern portion of Oxnard, including RiverPark. The City built Fire Station No. 7, located at 3300 Turnout Circle in RiverPark, on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Thames River Drive. Apparatus at Fire Station No. 7 includes Engine 67 and Hazardous Materials Unit 67. All personnel at this station are trained as Hazardous Materials Technicians and Specialists. The City’s fire station is located adjacent to Ventura County Fire Station No. 51, which serves the unincorporated community of El Rio.

Police Facilities
An Oxnard Police substation is located at 2751 Park View Court in the Collection retail commercial development in District D. One (1) full-time police officer is dedicated to providing service in RiverPark.

Parks
The RiverPark Specific Plan contains approximately 53 acres of parks and open including the joint use park for Rio Del Mar Elementary School and Rio Vista Intermediate School. • Vineyard Park
• East Park
• Village Green Park
• Gateway Park
• Central Park
• Windrow Park
• Phase 1 Water Recharge Basin Trail System
• Commons Green
605

2.0 Project Description
City of Oxnard 2.0-5 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
• Crescent Park
• Town Square
• Children’s Park
• Santa Clara River Trail Phase 2
• Phase 3 Recharge Basin Trail

2.3 PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
The RiverPark Specific Plan regulates the amount of commercial and residential development permitted in each District with an overall control on the total amount of commercial and residential development.

The Adopted Specific Plan currently allows development of up to 2,098,000 square feet of commercial space and 3,043 residential units.

The Specific Plan Amendment would add the option for additional residential development in Districts B, C and D of the Specific Plan. If the option for additional residential development is not exercised the approved commercial development option can be chosen. If the proposed residential development option is chosen for each District, the amount of commercial development allowed under the Specific Plan would be reduced in accordance with Table 5: Residential Option Development Scenarios, below. As the intent of the Specific Plan Amendment is to add the option for additional residential development, this Addendum analyzes the potential environmental effects associated with implementation of the proposed residential option in Districts B, C and D.

The Specific Plan Amendment would include adjustments to the amount of commercial and residential development in each Planning District with the residential option chosen. The total amount of commercial development allowed would be reduced by up to 562,000 square feet to 1,536,000 square feet and the maximum number of dwelling units would be increased by 1,025 units to 4,068 units as shown below in Table 2: Proposed Specific Plan Amendment Land Use Summary.

Table 2
Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
Land Use Summary
Maximum
Commercial Development
(sq. ft.)
Maximum Residential
Development
(units)
Adopted Specific Plan 2,098,000 3,043
Proposed Specific Plan Amendment 1,536,000 4,068
Change -562,000 +1,025
The change in the proposed amount of residential and commercial development by district with the residential option selected is shown in Table 3: Proposed Land Use Changes by District. 606

2.0 Project Description
City of Oxnard 2.0-6 RiverPark Project Final EIR Draft Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants November 2021
Table 3
Proposed Land Use Changes by District
Planning
District Criteria Adopted Specific Plan
Proposed Specific Plan
Amendment
Difference
(Adopted - Proposed)
Size (acres) 47.5 47.5 0
A Commercial (ksf) 456 456 0
Residential (units) 440 440 0
Size (acres) 5.5 5.5 0
B Commercial (ksf) 104 104 0
Residential (units) 0 333 333
Size (acres) 24.6 24.6 0
C Commercial (ksf) 478 478 0
Residential (units) 0 280 280
Size (acres) 88.4 88.4 0
D Commercial (ksf) 904 949 (45)
Residential (units) 662 924 262
Size (acres) 8.9 8.9 0
E Commercial (ksf) 111 110 (1)
Residential (units) 0 0 0
Size (acres) 37.9 37.9 0
F Commercial (ksf) 5 0 (5)
Residential (units) 482 482 0
Size (acres) 53.0 53.0 0
G Commercial (ksf) 15 0 (15)
Residential (units) 425 425 0
Size (acres) 83.9 83.9 0
H Commercial (ksf) 0 0 0
Residential (units) 492 492 0
Size (acres) 56.8 56.8 0
I Commercial (ksf) 10 0 (10)
Residential (units) 510 510 0
Size (acres) 61.4 61.4 0
J Commercial (ksf) 10 0 (10)
Residential (units) 310 -310 0
Size (acres) 18.5 18.5 0
K Commercial (ksf) 5 0 (5)
Residential (units) 98 98 0
Size (acres) 13.6 13.6 0
L Commercial (ksf) 0 0 0
Residential (units) 0 0 0
Size (acres) 201.9 201.9 0
M Commercial (ksf) 0 0 0
Residential (units) 0 0 0

Source: Meridian Consultants, LLC. 2021
Notes: ksf = thousand square feet
607

2.0 Project Description
City of Oxnard 2.0-7 RiverPark Project Final EIR Draft Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants November 2021
With the residential options chosen, the additional multifamily residential units would be permitted in three mixed use commercial districts defined in the Specific Plan: (1) District B, the West Peripheral Commercial District; (2) District C, the West Corridor Commercial District; and (3) District D, the Town Center Commercial District as shown in Figure 5: Proposed Land Use Plan—Permitted Uses.

The RiverPark Specific Plan currently defines three categories of permitted residential land uses:
• Residential: Low-Medium (densities between 8 and 12 dwelling units per gross acre)1 • Residential: Medium (densities between 12 and 18 dwelling units per gross acre) • Residential: High (densities between 18 and 30 dwelling units per gross acre) The proposed amendment would add a fourth residential land use category:
• Residential: Very High (densities between 30 and 80 dwelling units per gross acre) This category would be applied to District B, the portion of District C located west of Oxnard Boulevard and north of Town Center Drive, and the portion of District D located west of Myrtle Street and east of Moss Landing Boulevard, as shown in Figure 6: Proposed Land Use Summary by Planning District.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would limit the total number of additional residential units to 1,025 units. Additionally, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would limit the type of these additional units as follows: Studio Units – 108, One Bedroom Units – 504, Two Bedroom Units – 363, and Three Bedroom Units – 50. The Specific Plan will require that 15 percent of the 1,025 additional units that would be allowed by the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan to include 5 percent Very Low Income, 5 percent Low Income and 5 percent Moderate Income Units.

District A, the Mixed Use/Office District, includes 47.5 acres located west of Ventura Road in the southwest corner of the Specific Plan Area. Development of up to 440 residential units, 35,000 square feet of retail commercial development and 421,000 square feet of office space is permitted in this District by the approved Specific Plan. As shown in Table 1, 356,483 square feet of commercial development has been approved and developed in District A with 99,517 square feet of additional commercial development allowed. 400 residential units have been developed in District A. The approved Specific Plan allows an additional 40 residential units in District A. The approved Specific Plan permitted options for both commercial and residential development in this district. District B, the West Peripheral Commercial District, includes 5.5 acres located on Ventura Road in the southwest corner of the Specific Plan Area.

Development of up to 104,000 square feet of commercial development is currently allowed in this District.

The proposed amendment would add the alternative residential option of developing up to 333 multifamily units. This would allow for the development of either 104,000 square feet of commercial development in this District or up to 333 multifamily units, but not both. The Specific Plan Amendment 1 Density range provides flexibility in allocating residential units within and between Planning Districts. Lower range is a suggested minimum.
608

2.0 Project Description
City of Oxnard 2.0-8 RiverPark Project Final EIR Draft Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants November 2021
would modify the northeastern boundary of District B which would relocate the gas station, which has been approved but not yet built, within District C.

District C, the West Corridor Commercial District, includes 24.6 acres located west of Oxnard Boulevard and south of Town Center Drive. Development of up to 478,000 square feet of commercial development, including regional commercial uses and a hotel is currently allowed in this District. The proposed amendment would add the option of developing up to 280 multifamily units in this District and concurrently reduce the amount of commercial development allowed by 157,000 square feet. The amount of remaining commercial square footage allowed would be reduced to 63,267 square feet. As described above, the Specific Plan Amendment would modify the District B boundary at the northeast corner which would relocate the gas station within the northwest portion of District C.

The Specific Plan Amendment would also allow the option to increase residential development in District D. District D, the Town Square Commercial District, is the primary commercial district in RiverPark and includes 88.4 acres located between Oxnard Boulevard, the Ventura Freeway (U.S. Route 101), and Myrtle Street. Development of up to 904,000 square feet of retail and entertainment commercial space and 512 residential units is currently allowed in this District. The residential development option under the proposed amendment would allow an increase of the maximum number of residential units allowed in this District to 924 residential units, consisting of up to 412 Residential: Very High units in a portion of this District currently developed as a surface parking lot. If the residential development option is selected, the existing surface parking lot would be demolished to accommodate new development. As shown in Table 1, the current amount of commercial development built and approved to date is 812,060 square feet with 91,940 square feet remaining. If the residential development option is chosen under the proposed amendment, commercial square footage would be capped at its current build out and no further commercial development would be allowed in District D.

District E, the East Peripheral Commercial District, includes 8.9 acres located south of Myrtle Street (RiverPark Boulevard) at the eastern edge of the Specific Plan Area. The Specific Plan currently allows the development of up to 111,000 square feet of retail commercial development in this District. As shown in Table 1, the current amount of commercial development built and approved to date is 21,066 square feet with 89,934 square feet remaining.
609
Proposed Land Use Plan—Permitted Uses
FIGURE 5
265-001-19
SOURCE: Di Cecco Architecture, Inc. – 2021

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
0 800 1600 3200
N
610
Proposed Land Use Summary by Planning District
FIGURE 6
SOURCE: AC Martin Partners– 2021
265-001-19
611

2.0 Project Description
City of Oxnard 2.0-11 RiverPark Project Final EIR Draft Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants November 2021
The proposed amendment would allow the option for an additional 1,025 residential units to be built in Districts B, C and D while reducing the allowed commercial development according to such selection.

Section 4: Residential Master Plan in the RiverPark Specific Plan contains Residential Product Type Standards in Section 4.4. New development standards are proposed to regulate residential development in areas designated Residential: Very High. The Apartments—Urban. Standards are currently defined in the Specific Plan for six types of residential development:
• Large Lot Single-Family
• Small Lot Single-Family
• Cluster Single-Family
• Townhouses
• Commercial District Residential
• Apartments/Multifamily
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would add standards for an additional type of residential development: Apartments – Urban that would apply to development on the three sites that would be designated Residential: Very High. Section 4, Residential Master Plan in the RiverPark Specific Plan contains Residential Product Type Standards in Section 4.4. New development standards are also proposed to regulate residential development in areas designated Residential: Very High. The standards for Apartments-Multifamily currently allow lot coverage up to 80 percent with 5-story buildings with a maximum height of 60 feet. The standards for Apartments-Urban would allow lot coverage up to 90 percent with 6-story buildings with a maximum height of 90 feet. Setbacks would be five feet on all sides allowing for denser development compared to setback standards for Apartments-Multifamily.

If the residential option in Districts B, C and D is implemented, the amount of commercial development within the Specific Plan would be reduced in accordance with Table 5, below.

To estimate the increase in population that would result from the proposed additional residential development for purposes of evaluating the potential for environmental impacts analysis of the occupancy characteristics for rental apartments in Riverpark was completed. To explore the demographics of the market for rental apartment units 2020 U.S. Census Redistricting Data was reviewed, the specific characteristics of the four rental apartment complexes in Riverpark were examined by looking at the type (studio, 1, 2 and 3 bedroom) mix of these apartment types in each apartment complex. There are 912 total units in the four existing apartment complexes in RiverPark containing 1,504 total bedrooms.

The total number of occupied units in the census data was 877, reflecting an occupancy rate of 96 percent (877 occupied housing units/912 total units). By taking the total population divided by the total number of occupied bedrooms (1,446 occupied bedrooms; 1,504 total bedrooms x 96 percent occupancy rate), the average number of residents per bedroom relationship was determined to be 1.18. 612

2.0 Project Description
City of Oxnard 2.0-12 RiverPark Project Final EIR Draft Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants November 2021
Based on the mix of units proposed, the average household size is estimated as 1.71 as shown in Table 4:

Average Household Size. An average household size of 1.71 would result in a population estimate of 1,755 residents for the additional 1,488 bedrooms spread across Districts B, C, and D.

Table 4
Average Household Size
Unit Count District B District C District D Proposed
Studio 44 22 42 108
One Bedroom 167 136 201 504
Two Bedroom 112 106 145 363
Three Bedroom 10 16 24 50
Total 333 280 412 1,025
Total Occupied
Households 333 280 412 1,025
Occupancy Rate 100% 100% 100% 100%
Total Bedrooms 465 418 605 1,488
Total Occupied
Bedrooms 465 418 605 1,488
Total Population 549 493 714 1,755
People per
Bedroom 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18
People Per
Occupied Unit 1.65 1.76 1.73 1.71

Source: RCLCO Real Estate Consulting, Occupancy Characteristics Memorandum, October 6, 2021.

2.3.1 Development Agreement
An extension of the RiverPark Development Agreement is being requested by Shea Properties to facilitate the completion of the commercial development in RiverPark, which has been delayed by both changes in retail commercial demands and the pandemic. The proposed amendments to the Specific Plan and Development Agreement would also add the option to allow residential development in the commercial districts.

The proposed 6th Amendment to the RiverPark Development Agreement and the 2nd Amendment to the Oxnard Development Company LLC Development Agreement address the following:
• Specific Plan and Development Agreement and subsequent Amendments remain in force per the terms and limitations unless revised by the proposed revisions • Application of 2020 Development Impact Feesincluding limitations on Public Art Fees, Mobility Fee, and Park Development Fee
613

2.0 Project Description
City of Oxnard 2.0-13 RiverPark Project Final EIR Draft Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants November 2021

2.4 Residential Development Option
The proposed residential option would allow the development of additional residential units in Districts B, C and D. This option could be exercised in one, two or all three of these Districts. Table 5 shows the amount of residential and commercial development that would occur with the residential option being exercised in one or more of B, C and D. The commercial development is permitted by the current Approved Specific Plan. As shown below, the maximum amount of change in the mix of land uses in these Districts would occur if the residential option was implemented in all three Districts as 1,025 additional residential units would be developed and the amount of commercial development in these Districts would be reduced by 562,457 square feet. The potential environmental effects of each of these scenarios is evaluated in this Addendum.

Table 5
Residential Option Development Scenarios
Scenario Additional Residential Units
Reduction in Commercial
Development
Districts B, C & D 1,025 -562,457
Districts B & C 613 -336,377
Districts C & D 692 -379,727
Districts B & D 745 -408,810
District Ba 333 -182,730
District Cb 280 -153,647
District Dc 412 -226,080

Source: Meridian Consultants, LLC. 2021
614
City of Oxnard 3.0-1 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

3.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS
This analysis section includes separate subsections for each environmental topic addressed in the Final EIR and subsequent addendums. Each topical section first presents a summary of the information and conclusions of the analysis in the Final EIR subsequent addendums. Updated information reflecting any changes in the environmental setting related to each topic is presented first in each subsection, followed by analysis of the environmental impacts of the RiverPark project with the proposed changes in land uses included in the proposed amendment. For each topic, a determination is also made on whether the current proposal would result in any new significant impacts or any substantial increase in the severity of the impacts identified in the Final EIR and subsequent addendums. The mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and applicable, subsequent addendums, are also updated as needed to reflect the proposed changes to the project.

3.1 LAND USE
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums The consistency of the proposed RiverPark Specific Plan project with applicable land use plans and policies, as well as the compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding land uses, were analyzed in the Final EIR. This evaluation addressed the consistency of the project with the City’s 2020 General Plan, the HERO Redevelopment Plan, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional Comprehensive Plan & Guide (RCPG), and the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) policies.

The Specific Plan Area is located within the LAFCo Sphere of Influence (SOI) line for the City and within the 20-year City Urban Restriction Boundary (CURB) established by the City’s 2020 General Plan. Prior to approval of the project, the southern 269 acres of the Specific Plan Area (referred to as “RiverPark Area A” in the Final EIR) were located within the City. The northern 432 acres of the Specific Plan Area (referred to as “RiverPark Area B” in the Final EIR) were located outside of the City. After adoption of the Specific Plan by the City, RiverPark Area B was annexed to the City.

Annexation of RiverPark Area B to the City and development of the entire Specific Plan Area with the proposed uses was found to be consistent with the City’s land use plans and policies. Annexation of RiverPark Area B was also determined to be consistent with LAFCo policies. The RiverPark Project was also determined to be consistent with the SCAG RCPG, given that the amount of growth allowed by the Specific Plan was consistent with adopted regional growth forecasts and the characteristics of the project as proposed were consistent with relevant objectives of this regional plan. In addition, the RiverPark Specific Plan defined a pattern of land uses determined to be compatible with the residential, agricultural, and open space uses located around the Specific Plan Area. No significant impacts related to inconsistencies with applicable land use plans and policies were identified in the Final EIR and no mitigation measures 615

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-2 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would allow the option to develop an additional 1,025 multifamily residential units and subsequently reduce the amount of commercial development permitted by 562,000 square feet and in three of the commercial mixed-use districts in the southern portion of the Specific Plan Area. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would allow for a total of 1,536,000 square feet of commercial uses and 4,068 residential units within RiverPark. The addition of a Very High Residential: Very High land use category is also proposed to allow the development of the additional residential units. This new land use designation would be applied to three locations in Districts B, C, and D. The Specific Plan will require that 15 percent of the 1,025 additional units that would be allowed by the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan to include 5 percent Very Low Income, 5 percent Low Income and 5 percent Moderate Income Units. New development standards are also proposed for multifamily development that would be allowed by this category. These standards would allow multifamily buildings with up to 6-stories and a maximum height of 90 feet in the three locations in Districts B, C, and D that would be designated Residential: Very High or Commercial: Regional.

Since the original approval of the RiverPark Specific Plan the City adopted the 2030 General Plan. The 2030 General Plan has four major themes, one of which is to develop or reinvest within CURB with an “urban village” concept. The urban villages would incorporate private and public redevelopment, mixed land uses, affordable and workforce housing, and transit connectivity and are intended to be a key strategy for meeting greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets and implementing the Southern California Association of Governments regional Sustainable Community Strategy (SB 375). The Urban Village theme replaced Infill Area and Major Study Areas approach in the 2020 General Plan.

The 2030 General Plan defines Urban Villages as mixed use areas designed to encourage persons to live near their place of employment and/or support services. The integration of complementary land uses is intended to promote a pedestrian orientation to reduce trips and vehicle miles traveled and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

RiverPark is located with the North Oxnard Transit Enhancement District (NOTED) Urban Village as defined in the 2030 General Plan. The NOTED area includes the area north of the Oxnard Blvd./Vineyard Avenue intersection generally between Ventura Road and Vineyard Avenue including the Esplanade shopping center, The Village Specific Plan, and the Riverpark Specific Plan. The NOTED area is designated as a “Catalyst” project by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as an example 616

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-3 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
of desirable mixing of land uses and activities combined with transit that will total reduce the volume of local vehicular travel and, as a result, GHG emissions.

The Districts in the RiverPark Specific Plan Area that would be modified with the proposed Specific Plan Amendment are designated Commercial Regional (CR) on the 2030 General Plan Land Use Map. This designation allows major multitenant shopping centers that may include offices, hotels, and other services. Residential, live/work, work/live, and mixed uses are strongly encouraged in these areas.

The adopted RiverPark Specific Plan is consistent with the CR land use designation and Urban Village policies as the commercial districts as defined in the Specific Plan currently allow a mix of commercial and residential uses. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would change the residential and commercial uses in RiverPark by decreasing the amount of commercial development and increasing the amount of multifamily residential development permitted in the mixed-use commercial districts in RiverPark.

Currently there are 650,658 square feet of remaining commercial uses to be built under the adopted RiverPark Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment provides an option to allow approximately 88,000 square feet of commercial uses to be constructed and an additional 1,025 residential units. As such, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would increase the residential population in RiverPark, which would use and support the existing and planned retail commercial development in the Specific Plan Area.

The Residential High designation as defined in the General Plan allows residential development at a density of 30 or more units per acre. This designation allows mid to high-rise residential buildings, preferably as part of a mixed-use or urban village area with live/work, work/live, and mixed use development is strongly encouraged.

The addition of the Residential: Very High land use category to the Specific Plan would be consistent with the purpose and intent of both the Commercial Regional and Residential High land use designations and the 2030 General Plan Urban Village policies. The City General Plan defines floor area ratios (FARs) for the regulation of development intensity for commercial land uses to estimate traffic generation and municipal service demand rather than a specific development standard. The proposed land use changes would result in less commercial development than currently allowed under the adopted RiverPark Specific Plan, and the additional residential development would be lower in intensity than the currently adopted RiverPark Specific Plan.

The addition of the corresponding development standards for the Apartment -Urban development type would permit the development of apartment buildings up to 6-stories with a maximum height of 90 feet in the three locations this new residential land use category would be applied to in Districts B, C, and D. 617

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-4 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
District B is located in the southwest corner of the Specific Plan Area next to existing commercial and residential development. The locations in Districts C and D where this type of apartment building would be permitted are also locations surrounded by other multistory residential buildings and retail commercial development. The location and scale of the type of residential buildings that would be permitted would be consistent with the overall pattern of development in these mixed-use commercial districts and the goals and objectives of the RiverPark Specific Plan.

The changes in land uses are proposed in the central and southwest portion of the Specific Plan Area and would not affect the overall structure of the community or its compatibility with surrounding land uses.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would add multifamily housing to the central and southwest portion of the RiverPark Community while maintaining a pedestrian oriented community by placing this additional housing near commercial and employment generating uses.

The adopted Specific Plan defines landscape buffers to create compatibility with surrounding uses. These buffers would not be changed under the proposed amendment and no new types of land uses be proposed within the Specific Plan Area. Therefore, land uses would be compatible with surrounding land uses.

With the land use changes proposed, the RiverPark Project would remain consistent with applicable land use policies and programs. No new significant land use impacts would result from approval of the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan and no mitigation measures are required.

If the residential option is not exercised in Districts B, C and D, but only in one or two of these Districts, then the amount of residential and commercial development defined for the other potential development scenarios in Table 5 could occur. Each of these scenarios would be consistent with the current and proposed land uses within the Specific Plan Area and with the goals and objectives of the RiverPark Specific Plan. With the addition of the Residential: Very High land use category, the proposed mixes of commercial and residential development would be consistent with the purpose and intent of both the Commercial Regional and Residential High land use designations and the 2030 General Plan Urban Village policies. Furthermore, development of any of these scenarios would be compatible with surrounding land uses as well as policies and programs.

3.2 AESTHETICS
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums The EIR provided analysis of the significance of changes to the visual character of the area that would result from implementation of the RiverPark Project. The Community Design Element of the 2020 General Plan identifies scenic resources within the City. Roadways that provide views of the scenic resources and 618

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-5 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
agricultural lands within and around the City are designated as image corridors. The Ventura Freeway is designated as Regional Image Corridor, and Oxnard Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue are designated as City Image Corridors. In addition, the intersection of the Ventura Freeway and Vineyard Avenue is designated as a Regional Gateway. Prior to development, the Specific Plan Area had an open space visual character as viewed from surrounding roadways and uses due to the small number of existing structures at the time the Specific Plan was approved.

The change in the visual character of the Specific Plan Area as a result of the proposed RiverPark Project was not identified as having a significant impact on the visual character of the area. This was because the development that would be allowed by the Specific Plan will not obstruct long-range views of the mountains and hills in the Los Padres National Forest to the north from the Ventura Freeway or Vineyard Avenue. The height and character of the residential and commercial development proposed will also be consistent with existing development in the area. In addition, the northern portion of the Specific Plan Area will continue to have an open space character because the existing mine pits would be preserved, and no buildings will be located along the northernmost portion of Vineyard Avenue. Mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant impacts to aesthetics to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant impacts to aesthetics were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not result in any substantial change in the visual character of the RiverPark Community. The proposed changes in permitted land uses would introduce additional multifamily residential development in the central and southwest portions of the community up to 6 stories with a height up to 90 feet in 3 specific locations as shown in Figure 7: Proposed Massing Diagram.

The RiverPark Specific Plan currently allows buildings with up to 2 stories or 75 feet in District B and 5 stories in Districts A, C and E. Allowing buildings with up to 6 stories in District B would be a change from currently permitted height, however this District is located in the southwest corner of the Specific Plan Area next to existing commercial and residential development. The locations in Districts C and D where this type of apartment building would be permitted are also locations surrounded by other multistory residential buildings and retail commercial development. The location and scale of the type of residential buildings that would be permitted would be consistent with the overall pattern of development in these mixed-use commercial districts and the goals and objectives of the RiverPark Specific Plan. There would also be no change to the important aesthetic features such as landscape buffers, or the location and amount of open space, currently required by the Specific Plan to create a unified visual character. The Specific Plan would remain consistent with the Community Design Element of the 2030 General Plan. 619
Shea Properties
S pe c i f i c P l a n A m e n d m e n t M a ss i n g D i a g r a m currently allowable
(multi-story Mini Anchor 50')
allowable per SPA 90'
currently allowable
(Hotel 210')
allowable per SPA 90'
currently allowable
(Outparcel Commercial 75')
allowable per SPA 90' District B District C District D
Proposed Massing Diagram
FIGURE 7
SOURCE: Shea Properties - 2021
265-001-19
620

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-7 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
The land use changes proposed would not have any effect on scenic views as the scale and character of the development would not change substantially. Scenic views of the mountains and hills of the Los Padres National Forest would remain unobstructed, particularly along Vineyard Avenue, Oxnard Boulevard, and the Ventura Freeway. Landscape buffers and preservation of open space provided for by the adopted Specific Plan would ensure views of the Project site from adjacent areas are not adversely impacted by development allowed by the Specific Plan.

No new significant impacts to the aesthetic character of the Specific Plan Area and the surrounding area would result from the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan and no additional mitigation measures are required.

District B is currently designated Commercial: Retail/Office; District C is designated Commercial:

Convention/Hotel and District D is designated Commercial: Regional. Accordingly, any additional commercial use under any of the development scenarios in Table 5 would be consistent with land use designations for these districts and current and planned land uses in these districts. The location and scale of commercial development would be consistent with the overall pattern of development in these districts. As stated above, the scenarios including residential uses within these districts would also be consistent with the pattern of existing and planned development in is each district. Also, both the approved commercial and proposed residential uses would be consistent with the goals and objectives of the RiverPark Specific Plan. No new significant impacts to the aesthetic character of the Specific Plan Area and the surrounding area would result from development of any of the scenarios in Table 5.

3.3 EARTH RESOURCES
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums The Final EIR evaluated potential impacts related to the soil conditions on the site and the geology of the area. Geology studies completed identified a variety of topographic and soils conditions as a result of the long-term mining and agricultural activities within the Specific Plan Area. Substantial areas of potentially unstable artificial fill were found in the northern portion of the Specific Plan Area on the portion of the site used for sand and gravel mining. A potentially significant impact related to the stability of the slopes of the existing mine pits was identified.

The conceptual grading plan called for grading approximately 10 million cubic yards of earth materials over the entire 702-acre site. A balanced grading program involving excavation and replacement of the 10 million cubic yards of material was proposed. The majority of this planned grading consisted of the proposed excavation and/or replacement of earth materials in the northern portion of the Specific Plan Area to improve the structural characteristics of the soils in the mine site stockpile and plant areas and to 621

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-8 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
stabilize the slopes of the existing mining pits. A comprehensive program of 44 specific measures was identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all identified potential geotechnical impacts to a level that is less than significant.

The Final EIR identified that the Specific Plan Area was in an area designated by the State Mining and Geology Board as containing sand and gravel resources of regional significance. While all available resources on the site had been mined, some aggregate resources remained. Mining of the remaining resources was not considered economically feasible due to the relatively small amount of low-quality aggregate available on the southern portion of the site, which had been designated for urban development since 1986. Development of the portion of the site was, therefore, consistent with the mineral resource policies of the City’s 2020 General Plan. Nonetheless, the permanent loss of access to the approximate 2.2 million tons of sand and gravel resources on the southern portion of the site was identified as an unavoidable significant impact of the RiverPark Project. Mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant impacts to earth resources to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant impacts to earth resources were identified in the Final EIR.

No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
The mass grading of the Specific Plan Area has been completed in conformance with the mitigation program in the Final EIR to mitigate potentially significant geotechnical impacts. As described above, based on geology and soils studies it was anticipated that grading would be balanced within the Specific Plan Area.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would allow development of buildings like those already developed in RiverPark. All development would occur within the existing Specific Plan Area, as evaluated in the Final EIR. All structures would be designed with current building codes. For these reasons, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not result in any new or substantially more severe geology or soils impacts and no revised mitigation measures are required.

Development of any of the scenarios defined in Table 5 would adhere with the City’s building code. For this reason, any of these scenarios would be consistent with building regulations and would not result in any new or increase in geologic hazard impacts.
622

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-9 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums The Specific Plan Area contained limited natural habitat as a result of the long-term disturbance of the site for agricultural and mining activities. The southern portion of the Specific Plan Area supported no native plant communities because vegetation within this area was limited to agricultural crops, landscaping associated with existing development, and nonnative weedy species in disturbed areas. The northern portion of the Specific Plan Area included scattered patches of disturbed open space on the sand and gravel mine site and a small amount of agricultural land. The existing mine pits contained exposed groundwater, providing resting and limited foraging area for several waterfowl and other waterassociated bird species. No special status plant or wildlife species were identified within the Specific Plan Area during biological surveys. The Santa Clara River, located immediately west of the Specific Plan Area provides habitat for several special-status fish and wildlife species, including southern steelhead, arroyo chub, and tidewater gobi, which have adapted to the seasonal and daily changing conditions of the river.

The RiverPark Specific Plan included proposals to plant native vegetation on the reconstructed slopes of the mine pits and on the western edge of the Specific Plan Area along the Santa Clara River levee. No significant impact to native plant communities was identified and the introduction of additional native vegetation was identified as a beneficial effect of the Project.

Potential impacts to native bird species nesting on the site during grading was identified. A potential for significant indirect impacts to the natural habitat in the Santa Clara River from new lighting sources within the Specific Plan Area and the use of invasive nonnative plant species in landscaping were also identified.

Measures were included in the Final EIR to mitigate these impacts to a less than significant level.

As proposed and approved, the RiverPark Specific Plan included a water quality treatment system designed to treat runoff from the new land uses proposed within the Specific Plan Area and from off-site agricultural and industrial areas that drain into the Specific Plan Area. This water quality treatment system proposed was designed to trap and remove pollutants and urban sediments to the degree necessary to ensure high water-quality levels. Therefore, potential indirect impacts to biological resources in the Santa Clara River from stormwater runoff from the Specific Plan Area were not significant. Mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant impacts to biological resources to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant impacts to biological resources were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums. 623

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-10 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
The Specific Plan Area has been graded and the proposed amendment would only allow development in areas already mass graded and prepared for development. The land uses proposed in Districts B, C and D would not change the potential for indirect impacts on biological resources present in the Santa Clara River and would not substantially change the amount or character of storm runoff to cause indirect impacts to water quality in the Santa Clara River. The water quality treatment system analyzed in the original EIR has been developed to accommodate runoff from the planning districts affected by the proposed amendment. Therefore, no new significant impacts to biological resources would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and no additional or revised mitigation measures are required.

As stated above, the Specific Plan Area has been graded and all development is planned in these areas that have been prepared for development. For this reason, development of any of the scenarios defined in Table 5 would not substantially change the amount or character of storm runoff causing indirect impacts to water quality in the Santa Clara River. Therefore, any combination of commercial and residential development would have less than significant impacts on biological resources and no further analysis is required.

3.5 WATER RESOURCES
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums An extensive analysis was conducted on potential impacts to groundwater and surface water quality, and on groundwater quantity. This analysis determined that the RiverPark Project would result in a beneficial impact on groundwater quantity. Existing conditions documented in the Final EIR resulted in a net loss of 573 acre-feet (af) of groundwater per year due to evaporation from the exposed groundwater in the existing mine pits and the use of groundwater pumped from on-site wells. The RiverPark Project was projected to result in a net gain to the groundwater system of approximately 8,000 acre-feet per year (afy) due to the elimination of groundwater use on site for the existing agricultural and mine uses and from the planned incorporation of the reclaimed mine pits into the United Water Conservation District (UWCD) groundwater recharge program.

Construction of the Project required dewatering around the existing mine pits. Potential impacts to groundwater quantity and quality were identified depending on the volume of groundwater pumped and the discharge location. Measures were identified to mitigate these potential impacts to a less than significant level.

Changes to the amount, quality, and direction of stormwater drainage flows in the Specific Plan Area were assessed in the Final EIR. Stormwater flows generated within the RiverPark Specific Plan Area and those generated from off-site areas that drain onto the Specific Plan Area were proposed to be collected and treated by a system including water quality detention basins and additional features, including dry swales 624

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-11 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
and mechanical treatment elements such as centrifugal separators. After treatment, stormwater was proposed to be discharged to the Santa Clara River through existing drain outlets, or to the mine pits, depending on existing drainage patterns and the magnitude of the storm event.

Changes in minerals, nutrients, metals, pesticides, hydrocarbon, and microbial contaminants in runoff discharged to the Santa Clara River and the mine pits were analyzed. Conservative thresholds of significance were selected for determining impacts. This analysis determined that the planned use of the reclaimed mine pits by UWCD for diverted surface water flows from the Santa Clara River would not have a significant impact on groundwater quality.

The analysis determined that the concentration of pollutant constituents in the Specific Plan Area would be reduced from existing conditions or would not be greater than the maximum ambient concentrations for these constituents in the Santa Clara River. The proposed water quality detention basins were designed to collect and treat all runoff from storms up to a 10-year storm event prior to discharge to the mine pits, with runoff from larger events being allowed to discharge directly into the pits. This design was intended to ensure treatment of “first flush” storm runoff that contains the highest concentrations of pollutants. Because runoff from storms with a frequency less than a 10-year event would not enter the pits, overall mass loading of pollutant constituents would be reduced.

Reduction of the concentrations of all pollutant constituents to levels below the conservative numeric thresholds of significance used in the water quality analysis was determined to be infeasible because of the significant capital, operational and standby costs associated with the treatment systems examined as potential mitigation measures and because of the potential low reliability of these treatment systems that would only operate infrequently during large storm events. The Final EIR concluded that although the RiverPark Project would maintain or improve existing water quality, all potential impacts could not be reduced to a less than significant level even with implemented mitigation measures; for this reason, some unavoidable significant impacts to water quality were identified. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
Mass grading and construction of the major drainage improvements, including the main elements of the water quality control treatment system, have been completed. The proposed Specific Plan amendment would not introduce new types of land uses into the Specific Plan Area since Districts D already contains multifamily residential development and other multifamily projects are located around the other commercial districts. The amount of impervious surface area would not change substantially given the development footprint of the high-density residential uses that would be allowed by the proposed Specific Plan Amendment. No new or substantially more severe impacts to water resources would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and no revised mitigation measures are required. 625

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-12 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
All of the scenarios in Table 5 would include the development of residential and commercial uses in Districts B, C and D. The amount of additional impervious surfaces that would be added with any of these scenarios would be similar and no new or substantially more severe impacts to water resources would result from development of these areas.

3.6 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums Potential traffic impacts of the RiverPark Project were assessed in accordance with the City Traffic Impact Study Standards as well as with procedures specified by the Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) and SCAG in the Ventura County Congestion Management Plan (CMP). The analysis incorporated a detailed evaluation of traffic conditions at 33 intersections, including 25 intersections in Oxnard and immediately surrounding areas and 8 intersections in the City of Ventura. Five segments of the State highway network were also evaluated.

It was estimated that the uses allowed by the RiverPark Specific Plan would generate approximately 94,500 daily trips, of which 9,860 would occur in the evening peak traffic period. Of the total daily trips, 78,840 would leave the Specific Plan Area. The remainder of the daily trips would be trips between the residential, commercial, and school uses within the Specific Plan Area. The traffic analysis determined that these additional trips would significantly impact 8 of the 33 intersections studied. Roadway improvements were identified to mitigate all these impacts to a less than significant level.

Traffic conditions on the Ventura Freeway were also forecast for future year 2020. All freeway segments analyzed were projected to operate at level of service (LOS) D and better with the exception of the Ventura Freeway south of Central Avenue, where traffic conditions were projected at LOS F in the northbound direction during the morning peak hour and in the southbound direction during the evening peak hour with all projected cumulative growth. Traffic from the RiverPark would contribute to this cumulative impact. As this level of service exceeds the minimum acceptable Level of Service C standard set by the Ventura County CMP, this cumulative impact was identified as significant. Improvements necessary to achieve an acceptable level of service on the Ventura Freeway will be identified and addressed through the Ventura County CMP program. Mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant impacts to transportation and circulation to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant impacts to transportation and circulation were identified in the Final EIR.

Addendum 4 evaluated the potential effects associated with importing additional soil during the original mass grading of the site. This Addendum identified an additional measure to mitigate the potential for traffic impacts from truck trips hauling soil to the site. This measure restricted hauling between the hours of 9 AM and 4 PM to avoid the morning and evening peak hour travel periods. 626

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-13 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Addendum 12 updated the traffic analysis to evaluate a proposed specific plan amendment to increase the number or residential units allowed to 3,145 units and decrease the amount of commercial development allowed to 2.078 million square feet. This analysis, which used the City’s updated 2030 traffic model, determined the proposed amendment would reduce traffic impacts when compared to the Original Specific Plan. The certified Final EIR identified significant impacts at 7 intersections and the updated analysis identified significant impacts at only 4 of these 7 intersections. The City Council considered the results of this analysis and approved an amendment to the specific plan increasing the number of residential units allowed from 2,805 to 3,043 residential units and a decrease in the amount of commercial development from 2.485 to 2.098 million square feet. This is the amount of residential and commercial development allowed by the current Adopted Specific Plan. As impacts were reduced in comparison to the Original Specific Plan as evaluated in the certified Final EIR, no additional mitigation measures were identified.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
In order to determine whether any new significant traffic impacts or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified significant impacts in the certified Final EIR (Final EIR) for the RiverPark Specific Plan as originally adopted (Original Specific Plan) a comparative analysis of the number of trips that would be generated by the uses as evaluated in the Final EIR and the RiverPark Specific Plan with the proposed amendment was completed. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment incorporates all previously approved amendments to the Specific Plan.

The land uses permitted by the Original Specific Plan would generate 82,366 daily trips, 4,710 AM peak hour trips and 7,749 PM peak hour trips.

With the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, if the proposed residential option is implemented in Districts B, C and D, the land uses permitted by the Specific Plan would generate 73,057 daily trips, 4,932 AM peak hour trips and 6,987 PM peak hour trips.

Based on the trip generation estimates detailed in Table 6 below, when compared to the Adopted Specific Plan land use program, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment land use program would result in a significant reduction in both the number of daily trip and PM peak hour trips, if the residential option is implemented in Districts B, C, and D. Under this scenario the amendment would result in a reduction of 9,309 daily trips (approximately 11.3 percent) and 762 PM peak hour trips (approximately 9.8 percent).

Under the same scenario there would be an incremental increase of 222 AM peak hour trips (approximately 4.7 percent), which is effectively negligible from an analysis standpoint when considering the size of the study area and the resulting distribution of those trips across the 30 study intersections evaluated in the Final EIR.
627

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-14 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Table 6
Trip Generation Comparison for Adopted Specific Plan and Proposed Specific Plan Amendment Adopted Specific Plan
Planning District Daily Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
A, B, C 22,055 1,010 448 1,458 856 1,313 2,169
D 35,894 527 439 966 1,531 1,601 3,132
E 1,252 23 12 35 52 59 111
F 3,888 74 224 298 217 153 370
G 4,920 208 318 526 263 221 484
H 4,410 87 258 345 294 170 464
I 4,697 93 254 347 270 192 462
J 3,568 302 311 613 201 176 377
K, L, M 1,682 66 56 122 87 93 180
Total 82,366 2,390 2,320 4,710 3,771 3,978 7,749
Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
Planning District Daily Trips
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
A, B, C 17,632 949 617 1,566 749 1,056 1,805
D 30,579 451 605 1,056 1,389 1,303 2,692
E 1,432 25 14 39 60 67 127
F 3,888 73 225 298 217 153 370
G 4,920 207 318 525 264 220 484
H 4,659 92 273 365 309 181 490
I 4,697 93 254 347 270 192 462
J 3,568 304 309 613 201 176 377
K, L, M 1,682 66 57 123 87 93 180
Total 73,057 2,260 2,672 4,932 3,546 3,441 6,987

Source: Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc., Draft Memorandum: Traffic Impact Assessment for the Proposed Oxnard Riverpark Specific Plan Amendment 2021, Oxnard, California Ref: J1031c, (November 29, 2021). Refer to Appendix A. 628

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-15 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Table 7
Intersection Operating Conditions
Comparative Analysis Signalized Intersections
Intersection
Peak
Hour
Year 2019
Conditions [a] Year 2030 [b]
Year 2030 Existing
with Adopted Oxnard Riverpark
Specific Plan Project [b]
V/C or
Delay [c] LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS
Ventura Road &
Town Center Drive AM PM

0.51 0.53
A
A

0.104

0.226
A
A

0.439

0.528
A
A
Oxnard Boulevard
& Town Center
Drive
AM PM

0.66 0.56
B
A

0.491

0.488
A
A

0.389

0.561
A
A
Vineyard Avenue &
Riverpark
Boulevard/Ventura
Boulevard
AM PM

26.2 29.0
C
C

0.464

0.541
A
A

0.501

0.604
A
B
Oxnard Boulevard
&
US 101 Northbound
Ramps
AM PM

23.9 26.0
C
C

0.324

0.471
A
A

0.436

0.635
A
B
Oxnard Boulevard
&
US 101 Southbound
Ramps
AM PM

21.4 22.4
C
C

0.176

0.206
A
A

0.284

0.368
A
A
Vineyard Avenue &
US 101 Northbound
Ramps
AM PM

13.4 14.1
B
B

0.527

0.659
A
B

0.643

0.747
B
C
Vineyard Avenue &
US 101 Southbound
Ramps
AM PM

17.2 14.7
B
B

0.516

0.568
A
A

0.537

0.759
A
C

Notes
[a] Based on traffic count data collected in September 2019 and existing 2019 lane configurations. [b] Source: Traffic Analysis for Oxnard Riverpark Specific Plan Amendment, Crain & Associates, October 2009. [c] Intersections under Caltrans jurisdiction were evaluated using HCM methodology. 629

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-16 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Table 8
Development Scenario Comparative Summary - Trip Generation Trip Generation Estimates
Development
Scenario Daily Tripsa
AM Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour
In Out Total In Out Total
B, C & D 6,888
-16,867
-9,979
105
-247
-142
418
-157
260
523
-405
118
413
-704
-291
223
-763
-540
636
-1,467
-831
B & C 4,119
-10,091
-5,972
63 -148
-85
250
-94
156
313
-242
71 247
-421
-174
133
-457
-324
380
-878
-498
C & D 4,650
-11,392
-6,742
71 -167
-96
282
-106
176
353
-273
80 278
-475
-197
151
-516
-365
429
-991
-562
B & D 5,006
-12,264
-7,258
76 -179
-103
304
-115
189
380
-294
86 300
-512
-212
162
-555
-393
462
-1,067
-605
B 2,238
-5,482
-3,244
34 -81
-47
136
-51
85 170
-132
38 133
-228
-95
73 -249
-176
206
-477
-271
C 1,882
-4,609
-2,727
29 -68
-39
114
-43
71 143
-111
32 113
-192
-79
61 -209
-148
174
-401
-227
D 2,769
-7,982
-5,213
42 -117
-75
168
-75
93 210
-192
18 165
-333
-168
90 -361
-271
255
-694
-439
Source: Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc., Draft Development Scenario Comparative Summary for the Proposed Oxnard Riverpark Specific Plan Amendment 2021, Oxnard, California Ref: J1031c, (November 29, 2021). Refer to Appendix A. a Residential – Commercial trips = Net Change Because the proposed Specific Plan Amendment with the residential development option chosen would result in fewer daily and PM peak hour trips than the Specific Plan as evaluated in the Final EIR and that no significant changes to the regional trip distribution patterns or future traffic conditions will result from the changes proposed, no new significant traffic impacts or substantial increase in the significance of impacts identified in the Final EIR or subsequent addendums would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and no revised mitigation measures are required. 630

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-17 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
A comparative analysis of the projected future operating conditions of the adjacent intersections based on the intersection LOS results in the Final EIR and those published in traffic studies recently completed for related projects located in the vicinity of Planning Districts B, C, D and E. To provide further comparative analysis, an intersection LOS analysis was also conducted for existing Year 2019 conditions based on current traffic volumes and intersection lane configurations.

As shown in Table 7: Intersection Operating Conditions Comparative Analysis Signalized Intersections, the LOS results for all seven intersections are within the acceptable range based on City criteria and are consistent with the intersection LOS conditions forecasted in previous traffic studies for other projects in the area.

As shown in Table 8: Development Scenario Comparative Summary - Trip Generation, the proposed development of residential uses in Districts B, C and D would generate the most trips as compared to the possible combinations of commercial and residential uses for the other potential development scenarios.

Scenario 1, the Residential Option in Districts B, C & D results in a reduction of daily trips of 9,979 trips, a small increase in AM Peak Hour Trips of 118 and a reduction of 831 AM Peak hour trips. None of the other potential development scenarios would result in a greater increase in AM Peak Hour trips than this and, for this reason, impacts would not be significant with any of the potential development scenarios.

Parking
Parking in the commercial and mixed use areas would be provided by dedicated parking lots for commercial uses, dedicated residential parking in District D, and shared parking for commercial and residential uses where appropriate. The change in parking demand over time would be reviewed as development proceeds in District D.

Vehicle Miles Traveled
In 2002, the City certified the RiverPark Specific Plan Final EIR. At that time, analysis of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) to evaluate the transportation impacts of proposed projects was not recommended in EIRs. In January 2016, the Governor's Office of Planning & Research (OPR) issued proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines.2 These changes state that projects within one-half mile of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing high-quality transit corridor generally may be considered to have a less than significant transportation impact. In addition, the proposed guidelines advise that Transit Oriented Development (TOD) projects; development projects that result in net decreases in VMT, compared to existing conditions; and land use plans consistent with SCAG Sustainable Communities 2 California Office of Planning and Research (OPR), Revised Proposal on Updates to CEQA Guidelines on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (January 20, 2016),
http://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/Revised_VMT_CEQA_Guidelines_Proposal_January_20_2016.pdf. Accessed December 2021. 631

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-18 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Strategies (SCS) or that achieve similar reductions in VMT as projected to result from the SCS generally may be considered to have a less than significant impact.3 In December 2018, the California Natural Resources Agency certified and adopted the CEQA Guidelines update package, including the Guidelines section implementing Senate Bill 743. Specifically, Section 15064.3 Determining the Significance of Transportation Impacts was added which identifies VMT as the most appropriate measure of the transportation impacts of a project. The provisions of this section apply Statewide on July 1, 2020.

As discussed previously, the RiverPark Specific Plan Area is located with the NOTED Urban Village as defined in the 2030 General Plan. The NOTED area includes the area north of the Oxnard Blvd./Vineyard Avenue intersection generally between Ventura Road and Vineyard Avenue including the Esplanade shopping center, The Village Specific Plan, and the Riverpark Specific Plan. The NOTED area is designated as a “Catalyst” project by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as an example of desirable mixing of land uses and activities combined with transit that will total reduce the volume of local vehicle uses.

Per Senate Bill (SB) 743, the State CEQA Guidelines have been updated to incorporate VMT as the primary metric for analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA. This update occurred subsequent to preparation of the 2012 Specific Plan Amendment so VMT is not specifically addressed in the prior analysis. The City has not adopted any specific significance thresholds related to VMT. The OPR’s Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, dated 2018, provides guidance on analyzing VMT impacts in light of SB 743.

The change in land uses that would result from the Specific Plan Amendment with any of the development options in Table 5 would reduce the amount of commercial development and increase the amount of residential development in RiverPark. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would improve the balance of commercial and residential uses in RiverPark and would result in reduction of 6.8 million VMT annually for the Specific Plan Area when compared to the uses currently permitted by the Specific Plan. The uses currently allowed by the adopted Specific Plan would generate 164.1 million VMT annually while the uses that would be permitted by the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would generate 157.3 million VMT annually.4 The RiverPark Specific Plan with the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would, therefore, not result in any significant VMT impacts and no revised mitigation measures are required. 3 OPR, “Transportation Impacts (SB 743),” http://www.opr.ca.gov/ceqa/updates/sb-743/. Accessed December 2021. 4 Source: Refer to Appendix B for CalEEMod output files. 632

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-19 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

3.7 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums Approximately 155 acres of the southern portion of the Specific Plan Area was in active agricultural use and a small portion of land along Vineyard Avenue in the northern portion of the Specific Plan Area was also in agricultural use at the time the RiverPark Project was proposed. In total, 209 acres of the 702- acre Specific Plan Area was in agricultural use. The 155 acres of agricultural land in the southern portion of the Specific Plan Area was identified as Prime Farmland on the Important Farmlands Map for Ventura County prepared by the State Department of Conservation. This portion of the Specific Plan Area had been designated for urban uses since 1986 in the City’s General Plan and the RiverPark Project was determined to be consistent with the policies of the 2020 General Plan addressing preservation of agricultural land.

Since approval and implementation of the RiverPark Project would result in the conversion of this agricultural land to urban use, this loss of agricultural land within the RiverPark Specific Plan Area was identified as an unavoidable significant impact of the Project. No mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not introduce new types of land uses, nor would it locate development in areas not analyzed in the Final EIR. The proposed change in uses in the central portion of RiverPark would also not result in any indirect impacts to existing agricultural uses located northeast of the Specific Plan Area. No new significant impacts to agricultural resources would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and there would be no increase in the severity of the significant impacts identified in the Final EIR and no mitigation measures are required.

The scenarios presented in Table 5 include residential and commercial uses, both of which are included in the existing land uses for the Specific Plan Area. As such, development of any scenario presented in Table 5 would not result in conversion of agricultural lands nor would any agricultural land outside of the Specific Plan Area be identified for development. Mitigation measures are not required and no further analysis is needed.

3.8 AIR QUALITY
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums The analysis for potential air quality impacts resulting from the RiverPark Project was completed in accordance with the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (APCD) Air Quality Assessment 633

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-20 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Guidelines (APCD Guidelines).5 The APCD has established criteria for determining significant air quality impacts from a project. The APCD does not consider normal construction-related impacts to be significant.

Standard mitigation measures will be applied to the Project to minimize any adverse effect from construction to the maximum extent possible.

Emissions would be generated by both stationary and mobile sources on a regular, day-to-day basis from the proposed residential and commercial uses. Based on the threshold of significance recommended by the APCD, a project is considered to have a significant impact on air quality if it would generate more than 25 pounds per day of either reactive organic compounds (ROCs) or oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Emission modeling completed for the RiverPark Project in the Final EIR, showed emissions of NOx and ROCs would exceed the thresholds for both pollutants. Accordingly, these impacts were identified as significant in the Final EIR. Certain design features, consistent with the APCD Guidelines, were incorporated into the RiverPark Specific Plan, including:
• Encourage the development of higher density housing and employment centers near public transit corridors;
• Encourage compact development featuring a mix of uses that locates residences near jobs and services;
• Provide services, such as food services, banks, and other personal services, within office parks and other large developments;
• Encourage infill development;
• Ensure that the design of streets, sidewalks, and bike paths within a development encourage walking and biking; and
• Provide landscaping to reduce energy demand for cooling.

The incorporation of other standard mitigation measures recommended by the APCD were identified in the Final EIR as reducing daily emissions of pollutants to the maximum extent feasible. However, even with the incorporation of all feasible mitigation measures into the Project, daily emissions generated would still exceed the 25 pounds per day significance threshold. In accordance with the APCD mitigation guidelines, contribution of funds to an off-site Transportation Demand Management (TDM) fund administered by the City was required to mitigate the remaining impacts. Contribution of funds is required for each individual building project within the Specific Plan Area to fund trip reduction measures to mitigate these impacts to a less than significant level. 5 Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (Ventura County APCD), Air Quality Assessment Guidelines (2003). 634

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-21 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Modeling was also completed to determine if traffic generated by the Project would result in significant increases in carbon monoxide levels, referred to as carbon monoxide hotspots, at any intersections that would be impacted by the Project. No significant carbon monoxide hotspot impacts were identified in the Final EIR. In addition, no significant health impacts or odor impacts were identified for residents of the proposed Project due to air emissions generated by facilities and land uses in the vicinity of the Project site. Mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant impacts to air quality to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant impacts to air quality were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
Construction
The APCD considers construction-related emissions to be temporary and does not recommend quantitative analysis of these impacts for this reason. However, the APCD recommends that construction emissions be mitigated if the construction emissions are likely to exceed the significance thresholds for operational emissions. The Final EIR for the RiverPark Specific Plan includes mitigation measures that would reduce emissions of diesel exhaust and fugitive dust. These measures are implemented as part of all construction projects in RiverPark. The proposed amendment would reduce the amount of commercial development by approximately 100,000 square feet in District A. It would add the option of developing up to 333 multifamily units in District B and 280 multifamily units in District C respectively and remove the option of 104,000 square feet of commercial development in District B and reduce the amount of commercial development by 63,267 square feet in District C. The proposed amendment would increase the maximum number of residential units allowed in District D to 924 residential units, consisting of up to 412 Residential: Very High units in a portion of District D currently developed as a surface parking lot. If this additional residential development occurs, existing surface parking lot would be demolished to accommodate new development. Surface parking located in the portion of District D where additional residential development occurs would be replaced within the new development. Therefore, any change in construction-related emissions associated with the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan would not result in any new significant impacts and would not substantially increase the severity of any previously identified significant impacts.

Development of any of the scenarios in Table 5 would result in similar impacts as construction activities on each site would be similar. All construction would be required to implement mitigation measures to reduce emissions of diesel exhaust and fugitive dust as included in the Final EIR. Any change in construction-related emissions associated with any of these scenarios would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts.
635

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-22 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Operation
Mobile source emissions for the daily vehicle trips to and from the Project site were calculated based on the trip generation information in the Traffic Impact Assessment. The CalEEMod air emissions model was used to calculate area source emissions from within the proposed land uses. Area source emissions would be generated primarily by natural gas consumption by the various land uses of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment. The primary use of natural gas by the proposed land uses would be to produce space heating, water heating, and other miscellaneous heating, or air conditioning. The area source emissions also account for the use of gasoline-powered gardening and landscaping equipment for the Project and the use of consumer products by Project residents.

The estimated operational emissions, with implementation of the residential development option in Districts B, C and D, are presented in Table 9: Maximum Daily Unmitigated Operational Emissions.

As shown in Table 9, the estimated maximum daily unmitigated operational emissions for ROC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would be reduced by approximately 8, 10, 31, 25, and 6 pounds per day (lbs./day), respectively, when compared to emissions that would be generated by the land uses as originally proposed and evaluated in the Final EIR. The decrease in emissions results from the reduction in the amount of daily vehicle trips that would result from the Specific Plan Amendment.

Table 9
Maximum Daily Unmitigated Operational Emissions
Source
Pollutant (lbs./day)
ROC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
Maximum Adopted Specific Plan 337 208 1,923 3 419 115
Maximum Proposed Specific Plan Amendment 329 198 1,892 3 394 109 Difference -8 -10 -31 0 -25 -6
VCAPCD Threshold 25 25
Threshold Exceeded? Yes Yes

Source: Refer to Appendix B for CalEEMod output files.

The Final EIR identified a program of measures to reduce operational emissions to the fullest extent feasible and payment of TDM fees is required to mitigate the remaining impacts. These TDM mitigation measures to reduce emissions from Project operation include strategies to reduce vehicle trips or VMT, the use of low-emission vehicles, and measures that improve traffic flow or reduce congestion. No change 636

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-23 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
to the mitigation program is required as these measures apply to the additional uses that would be permitted by the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan. In addition, the Ventura County APCD Guidelines provides area source and operational mitigation measures that can be used for projects that exceed ROC and NOx significance thresholds. These mitigation measures include an off-site TDM fund, with the amount of funding proportionate with the number of emissions that need to be mitigated. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will not result in new significant impacts and any substantial increase in the significance of the air quality impacts associated with the RiverPark Project.

In Section 3.6: Transportation and Circulation, each of the development scenarios identified in Table 5 were shown to result in a net decrease in daily trips in comparison to the commercial uses allowed by the Approved Specific Plan. Implementing the proposed residential development in all three districts would result in the greatest decrease in daily trips and a small increase in AM Peak Hour Trips of 118 trips. All of the other potential development scenarios would result in reductions in Daily and PM Peak hour trips and a smaller increase in AM Peak Hour Trips and would not result in greater changes than would occur with implementation of residential option in all three districts. Additionally, TDM mitigation measures would be required for all development to reduce emissions from Project operation including strategies to reduce vehicle trips or VMT, the use of low-emission vehicles, and measures that improve traffic flow or reduce congestion.

Global Climate Change
In 2002, the City certified the RiverPark Specific Plan Final EIR. At that time, analysis of emissions of GHG and associated global climate change impacts was not recommended in EIRs. In addition, GHGs were not identified as air pollutants under the federal Clean Air Act and the California Clean Air Act. On June 19, 2008, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research issued a technical advisory as interim guidance regarding the analysis of GHG emissions in CEQA documents.6 The advisory indicated that a project’s GHG emissions, including those associated with vehicular traffic, energy consumption, water usage, and construction activities, should be identified and estimated. The advisory further recommended that the lead agency determine significance of the impacts and impose all mitigation measures necessary to reduce GHG emissions to a less than significant level. The advisory did not recommend a specific threshold of significance. Instead, OPR requested that the California Air Resources Control Board (CARB) recommend a method for setting thresholds that lead agencies may adopt.7 CARB has not yet adopted significance thresholds for GHG emissions.
6 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory – CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review (2008). 7 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory – ”CEQA and Climate Change (2008).” 637

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-24 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Development of the RiverPark Specific Plan as originally adopted and with the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would result in similar levels of direct and indirect construction and operational emissions of GHGs. These emissions, primarily carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O), are the result of fuel consumption from building heating systems and motor vehicles and are quantified below.

Building and motor vehicle air conditioning systems may use hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) to the extent that they have not been completely phased out of use; however, they are not quantified as emissions because these GHGs and would only occur through accidental leaks. Water vapor and O3 are also not quantified because water vapor concentrations in the upper atmosphere are primarily due to climate feedbacks8 rather than emissions from Project-related activities. Furthermore, O3 in the troposphere is relatively short lived, and Project emissions of ozone precursors would not significantly contribute to climate change.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would also result in indirect GHG emissions from electricity generation; water conveyance and delivery; wastewater collection and treatment; and solid waste decomposition. Electricity would be used not only in the Specific Plan Area, but also in the water and wastewater treatment process, as well as in the conveyance process where in-line pumps would be required. GHG emission factors from electrical demand were obtained from the California Climate Action Registry’s General Reporting Protocol9 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association’s CEQA & Climate Change Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act.10 The annual electrical consumption factor for water treatment and distribution was obtained from the California Energy Commission (CEC). GHG emission factors for wastewater treatment and solid waste disposal were obtained from the CEC and the United States Environment Protection Agency (USEPA).

Construction and operational GHG emissions comparisons for the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and the applicable Districts analyzed in the Final EIR (District A through E) are presented in Table 10: GHG Emission Comparisons. The emissions associated with the proposed Specific Plan Amendment represent a conservative assessment of the GHG emissions that would result from development of the Project. As shown in Table 10, GHG emissions would be reduced by 1,259 MTCO2e per year when compared to the 8 A climate feedback is an indirect, or secondary, climatic change that occurs in response to a forcing mechanism. For example, a disturbance that causes global temperatures to increase could cause more water to evaporate from the oceans, leading to larger amounts of water vapor in the atmosphere absorbing more radiation from the earth's surface and emitting more radiation back, thereby enhancing the greenhouse effect and further increasing the air temperature. 9 California Climate Action Registry, General Reporting Protocol: Reporting Entity-Wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Version

3.1 (2009).
10 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, CEQA & Climate Change Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (2008), 61. 638

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-25 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Final EIR. This is mainly due to the reduction of emitting sources from mobile emissions due to the reduced amount of retail proposed.

Table 10
GHG Emission Comparisons
Emissions (MTCO2e per year)
GHG Emissions Sources Adopted Specific Plan
Proposed Specific Plan
Amendment Change
Construction (Amortized) 432 454 2
Area 35 50 15
Energy 11,737 12,723 986
Mobile 47,655 45,551 -2,104
Waste 2,264 2,252 -12
Water 2,034 1,868 -166
Annual Total Emissions 64,157 62,898 -1,259
Note: Emission calculations are provided in Appendix B. Totals in tables may not appear to add exactly due to rounding in the computer model calculations.

In addition, several regulatory actions have taken place at the federal and State level that would reduce GHG emissions from motor vehicles, and these reductions were not accounted for in the adopted Specific Plan. In 2007, the President signed the Energy Independence and Security Act, which set a goal of achieving a Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standard of 35 miles per gallon by 2020 for new cars, light trucks, and sport utility vehicles. Most recently, the Obama Administration has issued an executive order requiring the USEPA to reconsider granting California a waiver to implement the so-called Pavley standards, which was adopted by the State in 2004 and requires substantial reductions in tailpipe GHG emissions. On May 19, 2009, Obama Administration proposed a CAFE standard of 35.5 mpg by 2016. In response to this announcement, California—and states adopting California emissions standards—have agreed to defer to the proposed national standard through model year 2016 if granted a waiver by the USEPA to implement the Pavley standards. The 2016 endpoint of the two standards is similar, although the national standard ramps up slightly more slowly than required under the California standard. The Pavley standards require additional reductions in CO2 emissions beyond 2016.

California will implement new regulations that will reduce GHG emissions as part of the State’s overall strategy to achieve the goals of The Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill [AB] 32). In late 2008, CARB adopted the Climate Change Scoping Plan, which outlines the strategies that would reduce California’s GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The strategies target all major sectors including transportation, energy, industry, and residential and commercial development. Under CARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan, the Low Carbon Fuel Standard was adopted on April 23, 2009, and would reduce 639

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-26 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
the carbon intensity of California passenger vehicle fuels by at least 10 percent (Scoping Plan Measure 5).

Also, under CARB’s Climate Change Scoping Plan, fuel-efficient tire standards are being pursued (Scoping Plan Measure 7). Additional strategies include increasing renewable energy, improving building energy efficiency standards, reducing the use and production of high global warming potential gases, improving water efficiency, and implementing a cap and trade program. For these reasons, the GHG emissions presented above likely overestimate the actual emissions that would result from Project construction and operation.

In addition, CARB approved and released an update to the Scoping Plan in May 2014. As noted in the 2014 Scoping Plan Update, the projected total business-as-usual emissions for year 2020 (estimated as 509 MMTCO2e) must be reduced by approximately 15 percent to achieve the CARB’s approved 2020 emission target of 431 MTCO2e. The Scoping Plan identified recommended measures for multiple GHG emission sectors and the associated emission reductions needed to achieve the year 2020 emissions target—each sector has a different emission reduction target. Most of the measures target the transportation and electricity sectors.

As previously discussed, the Specific Plan Amendment would result in a reduction of emissions, primarily from mobile sources, when compared to the RiverPark Specific Plan as originally approved. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would also result in reduced GHG emissions due to a proportionate reduction from mobile sources. While the provisions of CEQA in place at the time that the Final EIR for the RiverPark Specific Plan was certified did not require the significance of GHG emissions on global climate change to be evaluated, the GHG emissions now recognized as air pollutants would still be emitted as a result of construction and operation of the Specific Plan Amendment. Therefore, the GHG emissions presented in this assessment are not considered to be new emissions or undisclosed impacts. These emissions would have occurred regardless of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment. Furthermore, as noted above, the GHG emissions for the Specific Plan Amendment are incrementally reduced when compared to the RiverPark Specific Plan. Therefore, the GHG emissions associated with the Specific Plan Amendment would not result in any new or substantially more severe impacts than the original RiverPark Specific Plan Project.

Although the Final EIR did not specifically address GHG emissions and the potential for global climate change impacts, the Project includes features and mitigation measures that would reduce GHG emissions.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not substantially change these characteristics of the RiverPark Community:
• Balanced Community: RiverPark provide for development of a balanced community with a diverse mix of land uses within the Oxnard CURB. Mixed land use developments result in an overall reduction in VMT as residents would need to travel shorter distances to obtain daily necessities and for entertainment. Residents could also easily combine multiple destinations into a single trip. 640

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-27 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
• Reclaim Land within the City: RiverPark reclaimed the existing sand and gravel mine site in the northern portion of the Specific Plan Area to provide additional housing opportunities in the City.

Housing opportunities closer to a city’s urban core and employment center result in an overall reduction in VMT as residents would travel shorter distances to places of employment. • Compact and Cohesive Community: RiverPark is a compact, cohesive community consisting of residential, commercial, open space, and public facilities connected by a coherent network of interconnected streets. The Project includes medium- and high-density housing, which results in an overall reduction in VMT as urban sprawl would be reduced and a greater number of people would live in closer proximity to City services.
• Compatible with Natural Habitat: RiverPark creates a community that is compatible with the Santa Clara River by providing additional native vegetation within the Specific Plan Area to complement the natural habitat in the river and providing for connections to the regional trail planned along the river.

Compatibility with the natural habitat and use of native vegetation reduces the need for additional irrigation while providing sources of natural carbon sequestration. • Public Transportation: RiverPark integrates public transit into neighborhoods and the surrounding community. This reduces the need for residents and employees to utilize privately owned motor vehicles and reduces the overall VMT associated with the Project. • Pedestrian Connections: RiverPark provides strong pedestrian connections between land uses and a variety of housing choices and institutional activities. This reduces the need for residents and employees to utilize privately owned motor vehicles and would reduce the overall VMT associated with the Project.

The SCS goals and policies to reduce VMT focus on transportation and land use planning that include building mixed use projects, locating residents closer to where they work and play, and designing communities so there is access to high quality transit service. The SCS identifies transportation network actions and strategies that are outside the City’s jurisdiction and control, such as expanding the use of transit modes in sub regions (e.g., bus rapid transit (BRT), rail, limited-stop service, and point-to-point express service utilizing the high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) and high-occupancy toll (HOT) lane networks.

In areas without quality transit, the SCS identifies land use strategies to promote development patterns that result in fewer vehicles miles travelled and thus lower GHG emissions. Such land use strategies including local government adoption of updated zoning codes, General Plans, and other regulatory policies that promote neighborhood-oriented development, suburban villages, and revitalized main streets consistent with SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) 2016–2040. Vehicle trips generated by growth within the Specific Plan Area would result in operational emissions through the consumption of fossil fuels.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would reduce commercial uses and increase the number of residential units in RiverPark which would result in reduction of 6.8 million vehicle miles travelled (VMT) 641

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-28 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
annually for Specific Plan Area when compared to the uses currently permitted by the Specific Plan. The uses currently allowed by the Specific Plan would generate 164.1 million VMT annually while the uses that would be permitted by the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would generate 157.3 million VMT annually.11 This would be consistent with the features and measures identified in the Final EIR that would reduce GHG emissions.

In addition, because the Specific Plan Amendment is required to provide TDM fees paid to the City as a compensation for exceeding the air quality emissions thresholds of significance, the City would invest in emission-reducing technologies and programs that would reduce air quality emissions in the region.

Generally, a reduction in air quality emissions would have the co-benefit of also reducing GHG emissions.

The City would implement additional trip reduction measures to help further reduce vehicle-related emissions, as well as implement energy-consumption reduction programs to reduce GHG emissions.12,13 Therefore, as the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not result in an increase in GHG emissions when compared to the adopted Specific Plan and incorporates Project design features and mitigation measures that would result in the reduction of GHG emissions, no new significant impacts related to GHG emissions will result and no revised mitigation measures are required.

3.9 NOISE
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums Analysis of potential noise impacts resulting from construction activities, roadway noise, and stationary sources to both on- and off-site land uses was presented in the EIR. Temporary noise increases from equipment used during site development and individual building projects would result in significant impacts to both on- and off-site residential uses. However, with the inclusion of the recommended mitigation measures, these potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant. Future roadway noise levels were modeled based on the projected traffic volumes in the Project traffic study. The increase in roadway noise along roadways, both on and off site, generated by Project traffic was determined not to be significant. Mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant noise impacts to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant noise impacts were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
No change in construction activities or the noise associated with construction would result from the proposed changes in uses permitted in Planning Districts B, C and D with the residential development 11 Source: Refer to Appendix B for CalEEMod output files. 12 City of Oxnard, 2030 General Plan Goals & Policies, Chapter 2: Sustainable Community (Adopted October 2011), pp. 2–11. 13 City of Oxnard, Energy Action Plan: A Component of the Oxnard Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (April 2013). 642

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-29 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
option chosen. Noise from the construction of the proposed uses was addressed in the RiverPark Final EIR. In addition, construction would occur in locations already analyzed in the Final EIR. The Final EIR determined that temporary construction impacts would be significant prior to mitigation. Mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR would reduce construction noise impacts to less than significant levels.

The analysis contained in the Final EIR predicted that increases in off-site ambient noise levels on existing and planned streets in the vicinity of the Specific Plan Area. Traffic volumes calculated for the proposed Specific Plan Amendment indicate that Districts B through E would generate approximately 32,011 daily trips. The analysis in the Final EIR estimated that Planning District B through E would have generated 56,244 daily trips. This results in a reduction of 24,233 daily trips in these Districts. Therefore, the Specific Plan Amendment would result in reduced traffic volumes, which would in turn result in a small decrease in roadway noise levels. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not result in any new significant impacts to off-site sensitive receptors and no additional or revised mitigation measures are required.

The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would allow the option for development of residential uses in District B which would be exposed to noise from traffic on the Ventura (US 101) Freeway. Other residential uses are located along the southern edge of RiverPark along the freeway. Due to the variations in the elevation of the freeway in relation to RiverPark, site specific noise studies are required by the City to determine the height and location of noise walls needed to attenuate freeway noise and ensure the City’s noise standards for residential uses are met. The City Sound Regulation Ordinance prohibits excessive sound due to its detrimental nature to public health.14 The Ordinance does not control traffic noise along public streets but applies to all noise sources located on private property including on-site traffic.

Properties within the City are assigned a sound zone based on their corresponding land use. Residential districts, such as those within RiverPark, are designated as Sound Zone I. Sound Zone IV includes all property within the noise contours around a roadway, railroad track, or the Oxnard Airport as identified in the Noise Element of the 2030 General Plan, such as the proposed residential uses in District B located along the freeway. In accordance with this existing review process, a site specific noise study will be required for any residential project proposed in District B. Therefore, no new significant noise impacts will result from permitting additional multifamily residential development in Districts B, C, and D and no revised mitigation measures are required. Therefore, no new significant noise impacts will result from permitting additional multifamily residential development in Districts B, C, and D and no revised mitigation measures are required.

Development of any of the scenarios presented in Table 5 would allow additional commercial and residential development within Districts B, C and D. Noise from construction within the Specific Plan Area 14 City of Oxnard Municipal Code Article XI Section 7-180 643

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-30 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
was previously analyzed in the Final EIR and included mitigation measures to reduce construction noise impacts to less than significant levels. These mitigation measures would be applied to any scenario for development including commercial and residential uses. As stated in Section 3.6: Transportation and Circulation, implementation of the residential development option in all three districts would have the most change in number of vehicle trips and all other scenarios presented would result in reductions in Daily and AM Peak hour trips. Therefore, any of the other scenarios result in a small decrease in roadway noise levels. Furthermore, as stated above, development of residential uses within District B would be required to complete a site specific noise study, pursuant to City regulations. With the mitigation measures already required by the Final EIR, any development including the scenarios presented in Table 5 would not result in any new significant noise impacts.

3.10 PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums The RiverPark Specific Plan Area is located within the Rio School District (RSD) and the Oxnard Union High School District (OUHSD). The RiverPark Specific Plan included two sites designated for three new RSD schools. Planning Districts J and K include a 27-acre site for a new K-5 elementary school and a new K-8 middle school. Planning District G includes a 9-acre site for a second new elementary school with 9 net acres. These 36.0 net acres was determined to be sufficient in size to accommodate schools with a capacity of 1,660 students, plus space for full track and field facilities at the middle school. Approximately 2,110 students can be accommodated on these sites if 2-story buildings are built.

RSD and OUHSD provided student generation rates, which vary according to grade level and dwelling unit type, and which represent an estimate of the average number of students generated per residential dwelling unit. Based on these student generation rates, it was estimated that approximately 1,990 K–12 students would be generated by the development of all the residential uses that would be allowed by the Specific Plan, including 1,654 K–8 students and 337 high school students. The addition of these students generated by the permitted residential uses would significantly impact both school districts. However, with construction of the planned school facilities and payment of developer impact fees to the school districts, adequate school capacity would be created to accommodate these students and impacts would be mitigated to a less than significant level.

Mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant impacts to schools to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant impacts to schools were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums. 644

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-31 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
Three K-8 schools have been built in the RiverPark Specific Plan Area as included in the RiverPark Specific Plan. As described above, the sites were provided in the Specific Plan for two K-5 elementary schools for grades K-5 and one Middle School for grades 7-8. The Rio del Mar Elementary school (Grades K-5) and Rio Vista Middle School (Grades 6-8) were developed for the Rio School District in Planning District J. The site identified for a second elementary school serving grades K-5 in Planning District G was developed the Rio Del Sol STEAM Academy which serves grades K-8. This K-8 school has a greater capacity than the K-5 school originally planned for this site. The combined capacity of these three schools is approximately 2,247 K-8 students. Based on 2018-2019 enrollment levels, the combined enrollment at these three schools was 1,655 students, leaving a remaining capacity of 592 students.

The RiverPark Specific Plan currently allows development of 3,043 residential units. The proposed Specific Plan amendment would allow the option to develop up to 4,068 residential units. Student generation rates are derived from the average number of students generated by each new residential unit. Student generation rates determined for the 2020-2021 year are based on a generation rate analysis of the historical residential development data overlayed with year 2020-2021 students living in new residential development. Based on the Rio School District’s current student generation factors, the 1,025 additional residential units that would be permitted would generate 154 additional K-5 students and 52 students in students in grades 6-8; a total of 205 additional K-8 students as shown in Table 11: Rio School District Student Generation below. The additional scenarios including combinations of commercial and residential uses would generate fewer students than would be generated by implementing the residential option in Districts B, C and D.

As discussed above, the development of the K-8 Rio Del Sol STEAM Academy created additional school capacity above the amount originally planned that could accommodate additional students from residential development in RiverPark. On a district wide basis, the Rio Elementary School District determined enrollment in grades K-5 was 57 students over capacity while enrollment in grades 6-8 was 266 students over capacity.15 Table 12: Rio School District Classroom Capacities, shows the current capacities for schools within RSD as of the year 2021.

As shown, the Rio School District RSD has a total capacity of 4,885. As RSD enrollment as of 2020-2021 was 5,208 students, the district was over capacity by 323 students. Any need for additional school facilities in the Rio School District will be mitigated by the payment of school fees or through an amendment to the existing RiverPark school mitigation agreement.
15 Developer Fee Justification Study, Rio School District, April 2021, Table 2. 645

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-32 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Table 11
Rio School District Student Generation
Scenario Number of Units
Projected Students
K-5 6-8 K-8
District B, C & D 1,025 154 52 205
Districts B & C 613 92 31 123
Districts C & D 692 104 35 139
Districts B & D 745 112 37 149
District B 333 50 17 67
District C 280 42 14 56

Source: Rio School District Developer Fee Justification Study, April 2021, Table 4 Student Generation Rates: K-5 (0.15), 6-8 (0.05), K-8 (0.20) Table 12
Rio School District Classroom Capacities
Grade Level 2020/21 Enrollments 2020/21 Capacity Available Capacity K-5 3,410 3,353 -57
6-8 1,798 1,532 -266
Total K-8 5,208 4,885 -323
Source: Rio School District Developer Fee Justification Study, April 2021, Table 2 Oxnard Union High School District has seven existing high schools, plus an independent study school and a continuation school. The high schools nearest to RiverPark are Oxnard High School, Pacifica High School and Rio Mesa High School. All three of these high schools have student enrollment in excess of their original facility capacity and portable classrooms are in use to accommodate part of their current enrollment. The Oxnard Union High School District has acquired land and is planning a new eighth high school southeast of N. Rose Avenue and Caesar Chavez Drive. Based on the Oxnard Union High School District’s current student generation factors, the 1,025 additional residential units that would be permitted would generate 62 additional high school students, as shown in Table 13: Oxnard Union High 646

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-33 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
School District Student Generation.16,17 Development of any of the other scenarios in Table 5 would generate fewer students.

Table 13
Oxnard Union High School District Student Generation
Scenario Number of Units
Projected Students
9-12
District B, C & D 1,025 62
Districts B & C 613 37
Districts C & D 692 42
Districts B & D 745 45
District B 333 20
District C 280 17
District D 412 25
Source: Oxnard Union High School District Developer Fee Justification Study, Sage Institute Inc., August 2020 Student Generation Rate: 0.06
Table 14: Oxnard Union High School District Classroom Capacities, shows the current capacities for each school within the OUHSD. Potential available school capacity for students generated by new residential development is determined by overlaying the District 2019/20 California Basic Educational Data (CBED) enrollments of grades 9-12 with the District 2020 capacity. As shown in the Table 14, the District 2019-20 enrollments for grades 9-12 exceeds capacity by 1,857 students.

Table 14
Oxnard Union High School District Classroom Capacities
Grade Level 2019-20 CBED 2020 Capacity Available Capacity 9-12 17,901 15,324 -1,857

Source: Oxnard Union High School District Developer Fee Justification Study, Sage Institute Inc., August 2020 To offset the need for additional school facilities generated by residential development, Government Code Section 65995(b) establishes the base amount of allowable developer fees a school district can collect from development projects located within its boundaries. The fees obtained by the local districts are used to maintain the desired school capacity and the maintenance and/or development of new school 16 Oxnard Union High School District, Developer Fee Justification Study, August 2020. 17 OUHSD generation factor based off of 0.06 students per multifamily residential unit for grades 9 through 12. 647

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-34 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
facilities. These fees would be paid for the additional residential units to the Oxnard Union High School District. Pursuant to Section 65995(3)(h) of the California Government Code (SB 50, chaptered August 27, 1998), the payment of statutory fees “is deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts of any legislative or adjudicative act, or both, involving, but not limited to, the planning, use, or development of real property, or any change in governmental organization or reorganization.” Any need for additional school facilities in the Rio School District will be mitigated by the payment of school fees or through an amendment to the existing RiverPark school mitigation agreement. Therefore, impacts to local public schools as a result of the Project would be less than significant and no revised mitigation measures are required.

Development of any of the other scenarios presented in Table 5 would generate fewer students than development of the proposed residential units in Districts B, C & D as shown by Tables 11 and 13. Any scenario that includes residential development would be required to provide developer fees to the school district in order to maintain the desired school capacity and the maintenance and/or development of new school facilities.

3.11 FIRE PROTECTION
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums Fire protection and emergency medical services to the Specific Plan Area are provided by the City Fire Department to the Project area. At the time the Final EIR was prepared, the City was operating six fire stations staffed by three fire fighters at all times.

The potential for fire hazards during construction was determined not to be significant. The potential for interference with emergency vehicles traveling through the area was considered minimal given the periodic and short-term nature of any construction-related traffic resulting from the development of individual projects within the Specific Plan Area.

As proposed, the RiverPark Specific Plan included a site for a new joint City/County fire station on Vineyard Avenue. This station, Station No. 7, would replace the existing County fire station located in the County El Rio Maintenance Yard on El Rio Drive in the RiverPark Specific Plan Area and provide an additional City fire station to serve this area. With the addition of this new fire station, no significant impacts were identified. No mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.
648

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-35 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
The original RiverPark Specific Plan allowed development of up to 2,761 dwelling units, along with commercial buildings and school facilities. Over time, amendments to the Specific Plan have modified the maximum allowable development to allow for the development of 1,467,342 square feet of commercial uses and 3,043 residential units. To date 1,447,342 square feet of commercial and 3,003 residential units have been built and/or approved. New development proposed by the Specific Plan amendment allows a residential development option of 1,025 additional residential units that would require emergency fire protection and medical services. If chosen, the residential development option under the proposed Specific Plan amendment would decrease the amount of commercial development and increase the number of multifamily units within the Specific Plan Area. An increase in calls for service could result from the additional residential units. It is anticipated that demands for fire protection service would increase above current levels under the proposed Specific Plan amendment, as up to 1,755 additional residents would reside in the Specific Plan Area. Expected calls for service of residential occupancies are ten times greater than commercial occupancies. Adequate service can be provided, however, from the fire station built to serve RiverPark. In addition, the City formed a Community Facilities District RiverPark to provide funding for public safety costs.

Fire protection services in the RiverPark Specific Plan Area is provided from the City Fire Station No. 7, located at 3300 Turnout Circle in RiverPark on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and Thames River Dr. Apparatus at Fire Station No. 7 includes Engine 67 and Hazardous Materials Unit 67. All personnel at this station are trained as Hazardous Materials Technicians and Specialists. The City’s fire station is located adjacent to Ventura County Fire Station No. 51, which serves the unincorporated community of El Rio.

The Ventura County Local Agency Formation Commission 2018 Municipal Services Review for the City reported that the City employed 0.67 firefighters per 1,000 residents, an increase from the ratio of 0.48 firefighters per residents in 2000. Oxnard’s current ratio is one firefighter per approximately 1,693 residents. The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) recommends one fire station for every 15,000 residents. The NFPA recommends each fire station service approximately 15,000 residents. Oxnard’s eight fire stations served approximately 26,000 residents per station.

The Oxnard Fire Department uses several metrics to determine that the City’s emergency units are appropriately placed throughout the City including average first response travel time and average turnout time for medical and nonmedical calls.18 The average first response travel time is the amount of time it takes for a unit to drive to the call location for a Code 3 response where units have lights and sirens 18 Oxnard Fire Department, Fire Statistics, https://www.oxnard.org/fire-department/oxnard-fire-statistics/. Accessed December 2021.
649

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-36 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
indicating to the public to pull over to the right. The travel time goal is 4 minutes (240 seconds). This goal was established, as the time goal for travel time plus turnout time should put a fire unit at any location in the City in about 5 minutes. From January through October 2020, Fire Station No. 7 achieved this goal approximately 36 percent of the time for 473 service calls with an average travel response time of approximately 5.3 minutes (319 seconds).19 All locations in RiverPark are within 1.25 miles of Fire Station No. 7, which results in the response time being well within the 4 minute goal.

For these reasons, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not result in any new or substantially more severe significant impacts and no mitigation measures are required.

Fire services provided by Fire Station No. 7 would be adequate for development of any of the scenarios identified in Table 5. Residential and commercial development would be adequately served in each district and response time would be well within the City’s goal for travel time. As development of the residential development option in all three districts would result in the greatest number of additional residents, any combination of commercial and residential development within the three districts would be within the NFPA recommendation of one fire station per 15,000 residents. For these reasons, any of the potential development scenarios would have less than significant impacts to fire services.

3.12 POLICE PROTECTION
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums Law enforcement and police protection services are provided to the City and the Project area by the City Police Department. The Police Department has one station, located near Oxnard City Hall, and three storefront police substations, which are used for community-based policing. Site development and construction would not normally require services from the Police Department, except in the cases of trespassing, theft, and vandalism. Such activities at a construction site are not unusual but are only occasional and do not typically place undue demands on police protection services. Slow-moving construction-related traffic along local roadways may reduce optimal traffic flows on these roadways and could conceivably delay police and emergency vehicles or contribute to a vehicle accident. This potential is considered minimal given the periodic and short-term nature of any construction related traffic, and no significant impacts are expected with implementation of flagmen and other standard construction practices.

Based on available crime statistics at the time the EIR was prepared, the Police Department based its service planning on a basis of 0.4 calls for service per capita The projected increase in population for the 19 City of Oxnard, Average First Response Travel Time, https://www.oxnard.org/average-first-response-travel-time/. Accessed December 2021.
650

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-37 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
2,805 units allowed by the Specific Plan was approximately 7,220. This population would generate approximately 2,900 calls for service annually. Based on the number of calls for service estimated to be generated by the RiverPark Project, the Oxnard Police Department determined additional police personnel would be required to provide police services to the Project. Based on the fiscal impact study prepared for the Specific Plan, revenues accrued to the City’s General Fund from sales taxes, property taxes, etc., would provide the funds needed for police service.

District D of the Specific Plan permits the development of a storefront police station of approximately 1,000 square feet within the commercial portion of the RiverPark Community when warranted by the increase in the number of calls for service to mitigate the impact of the addition of service area to the existing response beat serving the Specific Plan Area. No significant impacts to police services were identified in the Final EIR. A mitigation measure was identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant impacts to police protection to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant impacts to police protection were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
The proposed Specific Plan amendment would allow a residential development option. If chosen, a decrease in the amount of commercial development and increase in the amount of multifamily residential development within Districts B, C and D would occur. The 1,025 units the Specific Plan Amendment would result in a projected increase in population of approximately 1,755.20 At an estimated rate of 0.4 service calls per capita, the total increase in annual service calls from the additional residential units would be 702 calls. This increase would be offset by the reduction in calls for service from the reduction in the amount of commercial development of approximately 562,000 square feet. The potential increase in calls for service is not substantial in relation to the calls for service estimated in the Final EIR for RiverPark.

In addition, an Oxnard Police substation is located at 2751 Park View Court in the Collection retail commercial development in District D. One (1) full-time police officer is dedicated to providing service in RiverPark. The City also formed a Community Facilities District RiverPark to provide funding for public safety costs. For these reasons, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not result in any new or substantially more severe significant impacts and no revised mitigation measures are required.

The estimated number of calls for all of the residential development options in Table 5 would not be substantial in relation to the calls for service estimated in the Final EIR for RiverPark. As stated in the Final EIR for the Specific Plan, a fiscal impact study found that the revenues accrued to the City’s General Fund 20 RCLCO Real Estate Consulting, Occupancy Characteristics Memorandum, October 6, 2021. 651

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-38 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
from sales taxes, property taxes, etc., would provide the funds needed for police service. These revenues would be collected from residences as well as commercial uses if any options presented in Table 5 were to be developed. Therefore, development of any of these scenarios would not require a significant increase in police services and taxes provided from operation of these uses would be sufficient to fund the City’s General Fund to create additional police facilities.

3.13 PARKS AND RECREATION
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums At the time the EIR was prepared, there were 756 acres of developed parkland in the City, including a 224- acre public golf course. The City park planning standard for total developed acres of parkland is 3.0 acres per thousand population, as established by the Quimby Act. Individual standards for Neighborhood and Community Parks are 1.5 acres per 1,000 population.

As originally proposed, the RiverPark Specific Plan would allow development of a maximum of 2,085 dwelling units, with an estimated residential population of approximately 7,220 persons. Based on the City’s park planning standards, approximately 11 acres of neighborhood parkland and 11 acres of community parkland are required to serve this estimated population. Since the Specific Plan was originally adopted, an addendum was processed analyzing the development of up to 3,145 residential units. This increase in residential units proposed would increase the residential population within the Specific Plan Area. If all 340 additional dwelling units allowed by the proposed Specific Plan amendment were built, the projected increase in population would be approximately 874 persons. When added to the Adopted population estimate of 7,220 persons for the adopted Specific Plan, the total population in the Specific Plan area would be 8,094 persons. This additional population would increase the demand for parks within the Specific Plan area. Using this standard, the proposed Specific Plan amendment would require approximately 12 acres of Neighborhood Park space and 12 acres of Community Park space.

The Specific Plan included a variety of parks and open space areas. Three neighborhood parks are proposed within the Residential Planning Districts. In total, approximately 13 acres of neighborhood parkland will be provided. This amount exceeds the 12 acres required under the City’s planning standards for neighborhood parks. Based on the school facilities requirements of the State Department of Education, a minimum of 12 acres of playfields was required for the number of students planned for the schools planned in RiverPark. Depending on the site plans for the elementary and intermediate school sites, up to 18 acres of playfield space would be provided. The amount of community playfields provided on the school sites would be greater than the 12 acres required under the City’s planning standards for community parkland. In addition, the Specific Plan would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Parks and Recreation Element Plans and Policies of the General Plan. Therefore, impacts to parks and 652

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-39 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
recreation were determined to be less than significant and no mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
This increase in residential units proposed would increase the residential population within the Specific Plan Area. Since the Specific Plan was originally adopted, it has been amended to allow the development of up to 3,043 residential units, which was less than the specific plan amendment analyzed in Addendum

12. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would allow the option to increase the maximum number of residential units allowed in the Specific Plan Area to 4,068 units while subsequently reducing commercial square footage allowed in the selected District.

The current City standard for total developed acres of parkland is 3.0 acres per 1,000 population, as established by the Quimby Act. Individual standards for Neighborhood and Community Parks are 1.5 acres per 1,000 population. Using this standard, with the proposed Specific Plan amendment, approximately 16 acres of Neighborhood Park space and 16 acres of Community Park land would be required.

The Specific Plan Area as developed includes approximately 23 acres of Neighborhood Park space and 30 acres of Community Park space. This amount exceeds the required park space under the City planning standards. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would be consistent with the goals and policies of the Parks and Recreation Element Plans and Policies of the General Plan. Therefore, impacts would remain less than significant and no mitigation measures are required.

Development of residential uses in all three Districts (B, C and D) would generate the greatest increase in residents. The other development scenarios in Table 5 would include fewer residential units and would generate fewer new residents and lower demand for parks.

3.14 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums Site preparation and construction activities related to development of the RiverPark Specific Plan was estimated to produce approximately 52,000 cubic yards of solid waste, assuming no diversion of construction wastes. Some of this waste would be diverted at the City’s Del Norte Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). This facility separates recyclables from trash, thereby reducing the waste stream entering local landfills. Given the present and expected future availability of landfill space at the Simi Valley and Toland Road Landfill, the incremental nature of solid waste generated during construction, and the recycling rate of waste at the City’s MRF, no significant impacts to solid waste disposal facilities were identified from construction that would occur in the Specific Plan Area. 653

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-40 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Approximately 15,130 tons per year of waste would be generated annually by the uses allowed by the Specific Plan. This amount would average approximately 41.5 tons per day. Based on the daily capacity of the Del Norte MRF, no significant impacts to this facility were identified. After diversion, the amount of solid waste generated by the Project for disposal in landfills was estimated at 5,145 tons per year.

In 2011, Addendum 12 analyzed a proposed amendment to the Specific Plan to allow an increase in the number of dwelling units allowed within the Specific Plan area to a maximum of 3,145 units and reduce the maximum amount of commercial development by approximately 407,000 square feet. This change resulted in an increase of the total amount of Solid waste generated by construction of the uses allowed by the Specific Plan to approximately 54,450 cubic yards. This represents a maximum increase of approximately 7,000 cubic yards as compared to the estimated construction waste calculation contained in the Final EIR.

Based on available and planned landfill capacity, this impact was determined to be less than significant, and no mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR or subsequent addendums. No additional updates to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
Construction
Solid waste generated by construction of the uses allowed by the Specific Plan would increase with all residential option selected. The Final EIR estimated the amount of solid waste generated by construction based on 15 cubic yards of waste per residential unit, and 70 cubic yards of waste for every 20,000 square feet of commercial land use. The reduction in the amount of commercial development would reduce construction waste by 1,969 cubic yards while the increase in residential units would increase construction waste by 15,375 cubic yards as shown in Table 15: Construction Solid Waste Generation, resulting in an overall net increase of 13,406 cubic yards.

Given the present and expected future availability of landfill space at the Simi Valley and Toland Road Landfills, the incremental nature of solid waste generated during construction, and the recycling of waste at the MRF, capacity would remain to accept the incremental increase in solid waste generated by the proposed Specific Plan amendment. Therefore, impacts would remain less than significant and no mitigation measures are required.

The scenarios presented in Table 5 would generate lower volumes of construction waste than implementation of the residential option in all three districts as shown in Table 15. As such, development of any scenario presented in the table would not generate more waste and impacts would not be significant.
654

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-41 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Table 15
Construction Solid Waste Generation
Scenario
Commercial
(cubic yards) Residential (cubic yards) Total
District B, C & D 0 15,375 15,375
Districts B & C 791 9,195 9,986
Districts C & D 640 10,380 11,020
Districts B & D 538 11,175 11,713
District B 1,329 4,995 6,324
District C 1,431 4,200 5,631
District D 1,177 6,180 7,357

Source: Meridian Consultants, LLC., 2021
Operation
With the residential development option selected, once developed and occupied the 1,025 additional multifamily residential units would generate 1,199 tons per year of solid waste based on the solid waste generation factor in the Final EIR21 while the respective decrease in commercial development would generate 3,686 tons per year of solid waste, resulting in an overall decrease of 1,695 tons per year of solid waste. This would be a reduction in the amount of solid waste generated when compared to the approved Specific Plan as evaluated in the Final EIR.22 Waste composition is expected to consist of cardboard and plastic materials used in product packaging, along with aluminum cans, glass, food wastes, and landscape green trimmings. Based on available and planned landfill capacity, impacts would remain less than significant and no mitigation measures are required.

Development of the scenarios presented in Table 5 would include development of commercial and residential uses within Districts B, C and D. Solid waste generated by the development of any of these scenarios would be similar. Scenario C would generate the most solid waste during operation with approximately 100 tons/year more than implementing the residential development option in Districts B, C and D as shown in Table 16: Operational Solid Waste Generation. This is a negligible increase in solid waste and waste diversion to the City’s Del Norte MRF is not included in this factor. Given the present and expected future availability of landfill space at the Simi Valley and Toland Road Landfills and the recycling of waste at the MRF, capacity would be available to accept the incremental increase in solid waste generated by the scenarios. No additional mitigation measures are needed and no further analysis is required.
21 Generation factor of 1.17 tons/year multiplied by 1,025 multifamily residential units. 22 Generation factor of 0.0024 tons/year multiplied by 1,536,000 square feet of commercial uses. 655

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-42 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Table 16
Operational Solid Waste Generation
Scenario
Commercial
(tons/year) Residential (tons/year) Total
District B, C & D 0 1199 1,199
Districts B & C 543 717 1,260
Districts C & D 439 810 1,248
Districts B & D 369 872 1,240
District B 911 390 1,301
District C 981 328 1,309
District D 807 482 1,289

Source: Meridian Consultants, LLC., 2021

3.15 LIBRARY SERVICES
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums The Oxnard Public Library operates three facilities and provides library services to the residents of the City. Under the adopted RiverPark Specific Plan 3,003 units are currently built and approved to date.

According to the fiscal impact study conducted for the proposed Specific Plan, approximately 7,718 new residents would be generated by buildout of the RiverPark Specific Plan. This increase in residents would result in an increase in the demand for library materials and space. In 2011, Addendum 12 was processed to allow for an increase in the number of dwelling units within the Specific Plan area to allow for a maximum of 3,145 units and reduce the maximum amount of commercial development by approximately 407,000 square feet. The addendum estimated that this would result in 8,094 new residents that would be generated by buildout of the proposed amendment. This increase in residents would result in an increase in the demand for library materials and space. The City’s Public Library system currently contains adequate capacity to serve the City.

District D of the Specific Plan permits the development of a storefront library facility to serve the residents in the Specific Plan Area, as well as residents throughout the City. Funding for the operation of library facilities is provided by allocations from the City’s General Fund. Based on the fiscal impact study prepared by the City, revenues accrued to the City’s General Fund from sales taxes, property taxes, etc., would meet the capital outlay for library service as well as fully funding all other necessary urban services required by the Specific Plan. Therefore, the increased demand for library services could be met through the allocation of revenue from the City’s General Fund. As such, no significant impacts related to the provision of library services are expected as the cost to operate and maintain library services to the site would be covered by 656

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-43 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
established funding sources and no mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any other subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
The proposed Specific Plan amendment would allow the development of an additional 1,025 multifamily residential units with an associated increase of 1,755 additional residents.23 This increase in residents would result in an increase in the demand for library materials and space. The City’s Public Library system currently contains adequate capacity to serve the City.

The adopted Specific Plan amendment permits the development of a storefront library facility to serve the residents in the Specific Plan Area, as well as residents throughout the City. Funding for the operation of library facilities is provided by allocations from the City’s General Fund and impact fees for Cultural and Recreational Facilities. Revenues accrued to the City’s General Fund from sales taxes, property taxes, etc., would meet the capital outlay for library service as well as fully funding all other necessary urban services required by the proposed Specific Plan amendment. Therefore, the increased demand for library services could be met through the allocation of revenue from the City’s General Fund. As such, no significant impacts are expected as the cost to operate and maintain library services to the site would be covered by established funding sources. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required.

Development of any of the scenarios presented in Table 5 would be subject to impact fees which would go towards the City’s General Fund and provide funding for additional library services. Additionally, sales taxes, property taxes, etc., collected from the development of residential and commercial mixes would meet the capital outlay for library service as well as fully funding all other necessary urban services required by the proposed Specific Plan amendment. As such, development of any of these scenarios would not result in new or substantially more severe significant impacts.

3.16 STORMWATER DRAINAGE
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums The drainage master plan included in the RiverPark Specific Plan maintained the general drainage patterns established in the City’s Master Plan of Drainage and was designed to meet and exceed the Ventura County and City drainage criteria. The RiverPark Specific Plan Area is generally flat, with gradients of less than 0.5 percent. The land generally slopes to the southwest corner of the Specific Plan Area, where the Ventura Freeway crosses the Santa Clara River. The approximately 702-acre Specific Plan Area accepts runoff from areas to the north and east of the Specific Plan Area totaling approximately 500 acres. 23 RCLCO Real Estate Consulting, Occupancy Characteristics Memorandum, October 6, 2021. 657

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-44 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
In addition to being designed to provide the capacity needed to convey storm flows from the Specific Plan Area and the off-site areas that drain into the site, the proposed drainage system was designed to provide water quality treatment of all storm flows from on- and off-site tributary areas. As the proposed drainage system provided adequate capacity for on- and off-site runoff, no significant impacts to drainage conditions in the area were identified in the RiverPark EIR.

The RiverPark drainage plan routes stormwater flows from storms in excess of a 10-year event into the reclaimed mine pits in the northern portion of the Specific Plan Area. Analysis conducted for the EIR determined that there was adequate storage capacity and freeboard available in these pits, even if groundwater levels are at historic highs. Based on this analysis, it was found that no significant flooding impact from the use of the water storage basins as drainage facilities would result.

The RiverPark Specific Plan also allows the Water Storage/Recharge Basins to be used by the UWCD for the storage of water diverted from the Santa Clara River at the UWCD Freeman Diversion Dam to recharge groundwater in the Oxnard Plain Aquifer System. UWCD plans to integrate the reclaimed mine pits into its network of facilities in the area and diverted water stored in these pits may be pumped to other existing groundwater spreading facilities or supply pipelines in the area. UWCD will have the ability to manage the level of water in the Water Storage/Recharge Basins to ensure that adequate capacity for stormflows and adequate freeboard are maintained. No significant flooding impacts, therefore, were identified from the proposed use of the reclaimed mine pits as water storage and recharge basins by UWCD.

A review of the flood protection provided by the Santa Clara River levee indicated the site was adequately protected from potential flooding impacts from the river by the levee. The Specific Plan Area is not located within a designated 100-year flood zone and no significant flooding impacts were identified and no mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
Substantial portions of the planned drainage system within the Specific Plan Area have been constructed.

The proposed Specific Plan amendment would change the allowed uses in the central portion of the community but would not change the street or drainage system. The Specific Plan drainage system is designed to provide water quality treatment of all storm flows from on-site areas and a portion of off-site tributary areas. As the drainage system has adequate capacity for on- and off-site runoff, the change from commercial uses to high-density residential uses would also not change the drainage characteristics of the affected portions of the Specific Plan Area substantially as commercial and high-density residential uses have similar site coverage characteristics.
658

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-45 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Flood protection from the Santa Clara River is provided by the existing Santa Clara River Levee. This levee, approximately 4.75 miles in length, consists of a stone-faced compacted earth embankment protected by stone revetment, a stone toe, and groins. Drainage inlet structures are provided through the levee to allow drainage into the river. The Ventura County Watershed Protection District is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the levee, which was originally constructed by the Army Corps of Engineers.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reviews and certifies the adequacy of levees to provide flood protection as part of the process of determining flood risks and preparing Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) under National Flood Insurance Program. In 2005, FEMA initiated a nationwide effort to verify the certification status of all levees currently identified as providing flood protection on FIRMs.

As part of this process, FEMA established a two-year Provisionally Accredited Levee (PAL) designation process. This process allows local agencies two years to provide FEMA with a levee certification report providing technical documentation confirming the levee meets FEMA levee certification standards. The Santa Clara River Levee was provisionally accredited under this program.

The Ventura County Watershed Protection District completed an evaluation report on the Santa Clara River Levee in February 2009. This report concluded the levee may meet FEMA certification standards, but additional data or documentation were required.

The Ventura County Watershed Protection District has completed studies for improvements to the levee and an Interim Risk Reduction Measures Plan to manage potential flooding risks until improvements to the levee are funded and completed.

The current FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that includes RiverPark shows portion of RiverPark are located in Flood Zone X, which is an area of reduced or residual flood risk due to protection from a levee. Planning Area B is within Flood Zone X. Planning Areas C and D are not located in this zone.

A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) is currently being processed with FEMA for the Village (Wagon Wheel) Specific Plan project located across the Ventura Freeway from RiverPark. The hydrology modeling completed for this CLOMR indicates that the future base flood elevation on the riverine side of the Santa Clara River levee that would affect Planning Area B is between 76.8 feet on the southern edge of this planning area to 77.6 feet in the central portion of this planning area. The elevation of the Santa Clara River Levee in this area is approximately 80 feet, sufficient in height to provide adequate flood control protection for Planning Area B. Planning Area B is also potentially subject to floodwater from south of the freeway on Ventura Road. Construction of the finished floor of any residential buildings above 78.8 feet on the southern edge of this planning area to 79.6 feet in the central portion of this planning area will avoid any potential flood risks. As individual development projects are proposed over time, potential flooding issues will be addressed based on the best available flood hazard information available at the time of submittal.
659

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-46 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
No new significant or substantial increase in the severity of flood impacts would result from the Specific Plan Amendment, which would permit the additional multifamily residential development in option Planning Areas B, C and D and no mitigation measures are required.

As stated above, the existing drainage system within the Specific Plan Area has adequate capacity for onand off-site runoff. Development of any of the scenarios in Table 5 would have similar site coverage characteristics. Districts C and D, as stated above, are not located within an area of reduced or residual flood risk.

3.17 WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums The City’s water supply consists of imported surface water and local groundwater sources. The City blends the water from these two sources to achieve a balance between water quality, quantity, and cost. The water demand for the uses allowed by the RiverPark Specific Plan was developed based on the water consumption factors outlined in the City’s Urban Water Management Plan and historical city data. If all uses permitted by the RiverPark Specific Plan as originally adopted are built at the maximum allowed intensity, approximately 1,835 afy of water will be needed. Under the RiverPark Specific Plan as currently adopted 1,492 afy of water will be needed.

Individual building projects within the Specific Plan Area would be required to meet standard requirements of the City, the State, and the Uniform Building Code. These requirements act to conserve potable water, ensure adequate water flow, and pay for the construction of improvements to the water distribution system as outlined in the City’s Water System Master Plan. The overall demand would build over time as individual building projects within the Specific Plan Area are developed.

A Water Supply Assessment (WSA) was prepared for the RiverPark Project and included in the Final EIR.

As required by the State Water Code and CEQA, this WSA describes the City’s water supplies and assessed the ability of the City to provide the water needed to serve RiverPark and meet all other projected demands over a 20-year period. These projections are required for periods when normal water supplies are available, and during single- and multiyear drought periods.

Fox Canyon Groundwater Management Agency (FCGMA) manages local extraction of groundwater from the Oxnard Aquifer System to prevent overdraft of the aquifer system in accordance with a groundwater management plan adopted in 1985. The FCGMA adopted an ordinance in 1990 that established groundwater extraction allocations for all cities using local groundwater. Unused allocations can be accumulated for use in future periods. The City has two existing allocations, one for the City’s own water wells and a second allocation held in trust by the United Water Conservation District. 660

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-47 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Under the FCGMA Ordinance, when irrigated agricultural land is converted to municipal uses, an additional groundwater allocation is transferred to the agency providing water to these uses. Since the RiverPark Specific Plan Area contained eight active water wells, the allocations for these wells were also eligible to be transferred to the City, in addition to the allocation from conversion of agricultural land. A total of 1,580 afy of groundwater allocations were available for transfer to the City. This additional supply would meet approximately 85 percent of the total estimated demand for the RiverPark Project of 1,835 afy.

In addition to local groundwater extraction, the WSA reflected the City’s Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment (GREAT) Program as part of projected future water supplies. The GREAT Program is a key component of the City’s long-range water strategy to combine wastewater recycling, groundwater injection, and groundwater desalination to make more efficient use of existing local water resources to meet projected water supply needs. The WSA concluded the City would have adequate supplies to meet the needs of RiverPark and all other existing and projected needs over the next 20 years.

The proposed on-site water distribution system consists of a looped network of 12-inch water transmission lines in the major streets. The proposed water transmission system was designed to conform to all City standards and determined to be adequate to serve the proposed Specific Plan Area and no mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
As required by State law, the City updates is Urban Water Management Plan every 5 years. The City’s current Draft 2020 UWMP, updated as of October 2021, reported the total volume of potable water distributed by the City to its service area in 2020 was approximately 25,885 acre-feet per year (afy).24 The City’s water supply sources continue to consist of imported water purchased from the Calleguas Municipal Water District (about 27 percent of the City water supply; 7,060 afy in 2020); groundwater from the United Water Conservation District (about 39 percent of the City supply; 10,074 afy in 2020) and groundwater pumped from City-owned wells (about 30 percent of the City supply; 7,744 afy in 2020).

Other programs within the City provide additional smaller amounts of water. These include the Advanced Water Purification Facility (AWPF), which is part of the City’s wastewater treatment system and uses Reverse Osmosis technology to produce treated wastewater that can be recycled for irrigation and other uses to offset the demand for potable water. The Calleguas Municipal Water District participates in this program by conveying treated wastewater from the City AWPF to agricultural customers for irrigation in lieu of groundwater pumping. As of 2020 the AWPF has the capability to produce about 7,000 afy. This 24 City of Oxnard, Draft 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (October 2021), https://www.oxnard.org/citydepartment/public-works/water/uwmp/. Accessed December 2021. 661

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-48 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
effort is part of the City’s Groundwater Recovery Enhancement and Treatment (GREAT) program. In coordination with other service providers in the region (including Pleasant Valley County Water District, Port Hueneme Water Agency, and UWCD, the GREAT program is a regional effort that will assist in aquifer restoration and in achieving the groundwater allocation restrictions imposed by the FCGWMA. Another component of the City’s GREAT program is its desalinization plant, or Desalter #1. This plant treats brackish groundwater and works in conjunction with the AWPF described above and the City’s groundwater injection well as part of the larger aquifer or groundwater management system. At the present time, expansion of the desalinization program to treat seawater is not considered financially feasible.

The reduction in the amount of commercial development and the increase in multifamily residential development would result in a net decrease in water demand. As shown in Table 17: Estimated Water Demand, the 562,000 square foot reduction in commercial development would reduce water demand by 113.4 afy, while the increase in multifamily residential development of 1,025 units would increase demand by 108.0 afy, resulting in net decrease in water demand of 5.4 afy.

Table 17
Estimated Water Demand
Scenario
Land Use
Annual Net
Change (af)
Commercial
(ksf) Residential
Change in
Annual
Commercial
Demand (af)
Change in Annual
Residential
Demand (af)
District B, C & D -562,000 + 1,025
units -113.4 108.0 -5.4
Districts B & C -336,377 + 613 -67.8 64.6 -3.2
Districts C & D -379,727 + 692 -76.6 72.9 -3.7
Districts B & D -408,810 + 745 -82.4 78.5 -3.9
District B -182,730 + 333 -36.8 35.1 -1.8
District C -153,647 + 280 -31.0 29.5 -1.5
District D -226,080 + 412 -45.6 43.4 -2.2

Source: Draft 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (October 2021).

Notes: *Commercial Generation – 180 GPD/ksf; Residential Generation – 55 GPD *Average household of 1.71 multiplied by number of residential units *+3 AFY added to indoor water demand for outdoor landscape water demand af = acre-feet (325,900 gallons)
Ksf = thousand square feet
662

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-49 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
As total water demand would be reduced, no new significant impacts to water supply or service will result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and no mitigation measures are required.

As shown in Table 17, development of any of the potential development scenarios would not generate a significant change in water demand and all would result in a decrease in overall water demand.

3.18 WASTEWATER SERVICE
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums A sewage collection system, consisting of roughly 300 miles of trunk sewers and 16 sewage lift stations, conveys flows from seven major sewer trunk systems in the City to the Oxnard Wastewater Treatment Plant (OWWTP), located at the southern end of the City in the Ormond Beach area. The development and operation of this sewage system is outlined in the City’s Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (2001), which outlines the general location and sizing of existing and planned sewage lines in the City.

The RiverPark Project was estimated to generate approximately 780,000 gallons per day (0.78 million gallons per day [mgd]) of wastewater when fully developed. The OWWTP currently has an average dry weather flow (ADWF) capacity of 31.7 mgd and a peak wet weather flow (PWWF) capacity of 68.2 mgd.

Total volume treated at the OWWTP in 2000 was 21.75 mgd, indicating there was capacity to treat an additional 9.95 mgd of wastewater. An expansion of the OWWTP, planned to coincide with the growth in the demand for treatment, would provide for treatment of an ADWF of 39.6 mgd and a PWWF of 75.4 mgd. With this expansion, adequate future capacity in the treatment plant would be provided for all projected growth in the City’s Oxnard Planning Area. The Oxnard Wastewater Treatment Plant has the existing and planned capacity to treat the 0.78 mgd of additional wastewater that would be generated by the RiverPark Specific Plan. No significant impact on wastewater treatment capacity was identified.

All the proposed sewage lines within the Specific Plan Area were sized to accommodate the wastewater generated by the proposed uses. After collection in the on-site sewer system, wastewater will be conveyed in the Central Trunk Sewer to the Oxnard Wastewater Treatment Plant. The City requires individual building projects to pay the City’s sewer connection fees, which provides funds to the City to make the improvements identified in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan. In addition, the City requires individual building projects to provide adequate capacity to convey sewage to a safe point of discharge. In this manner, the existing sewage collection and conveyance system would be upgraded as necessary to accommodate sewage created by development of the land uses allowed by the RiverPark Specific Plan. No significant impacts related to wastewater collection and conveyance were identified and no mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.
663

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-50 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
All of the proposed sewer lines within the Specific Plan Area have been sized to accommodate the wastewater generated by the uses as permitted by the Specific Plan as originally approved. Any change in development in the Specific Plan Area would require a study verifying downstream sewer capacity is adequate to serve sewer discharge demands. As shown in Table 18: Estimated Wastewater Generation, the reduction in the amount of commercial development by 562,000 square feet and the increase in multifamily residential development by 1,025 units would result in a net decrease in the amount of wastewater generated by the RiverPark Specific Plan Project of approximately 4,032 gallons per day. The annual net water demand is divided by the flow rate to show estimated use per unit and is further divided to produce annual number of gallons per unit per day. This totals approximately 83 percent wastewater generated.

No new significant impacts to wastewater collection and treatment would result from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and no mitigation measures are required.

The estimated wastewater generation rate of 83 percent can be applied to each of the scenarios presented in Table 5. As illustrated in Table 18, implementation of the residential development option in all 3 districts would have the greatest change in water demand and the other potential development scenarios would require less water.

Table 18
Estimated Wastewater Generation
Scenario
Annual Water
Demand (gpd)
Wastewater Generation
(gpd)
District B, C & D -1,765,874 -4,031.68
Districts B & C -1,055,657 -2,410
Districts C & D -1,191,820 -2,721
Districts B & D -1,283,176 -2,930
District B -572,959 -1,308
District C -481,603 -1,100
District D -709,122 -1,619

Source: Draft 2020 Urban Water Management Plan (October 2021).

Notes: *Flow rate of 1.2 used for annual wastewater calculations – (Scenario annual water demand)/1.2/365
664

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-51 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

3.19 ENERGY
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums Natural gas and electricity are provided to all developed portions of the City, including the Specific Plan Area, by the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) and Southern California Edison, respectively.

The total amount of electricity needed to serve the Original Specific Plan as analyzed in the certified Final EIR was estimated at approximately 60 million kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year and approximately 65 million kilowatt-hours per year for the Specific Plan as amended in June 2012 (“Adopted Specific Plan”) and analyzed in Addendum 12. Approved facilities located in central and Southern California alone will provide approximately 3,613 additional megawatts, which is enough power to supply over 2.7 million homes. The additional electrical demand of the Project can be accommodated within the long-term source and distribution planning. In addition, individual building projects within the Specific Plan Area are required to comply with the Energy Building Regulations adopted by the California Energy Commission (Title 24 of the California Administrative Code) as mitigation against the wasteful use of energy. For these reasons, no significant impacts on electrical supply or service were identified.

Total natural gas consumption for the Original Specific Plan as analyzed in the certified Final EIR was estimated to be approximately 285.5 million cubic feet (cf) per year and approximately 290.6 million cubic feet-per year for the Specific Plan as amended in June 2012 and analyzed in Addendum 12. Available information indicated natural gas supplies to California will remain plentiful for the next several decades.

The total resource base for the lower 48 states is estimated to be 975 trillion cf, enough to continue current production levels for more than 50 years. Technology enhancements will continue to enlarge the resource base; however, production capacity increases remain less certain. Despite this concern, production from lower 48 states is expected to increase from 17.1 trillion cf in 1994 to 36.1 trillion cf in 2021.25
Because the RiverPark Project could be accommodated within the long-term source and distribution planning of SoCalGas, and because future uses on the Project site are required to comply with Title 24 of the California Administrative Code as mitigation against the wasteful use of energy, it was determined the Project would not result in significant impacts to natural gas service and no mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.
25 US Energy Information Administration.
665

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-52 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
To account for current energy standards, updated energy demand estimates for the land uses allowed by the Original Specific Plan and proposed Specific Plan Amendment contained in the CalEEMod air emissions modeling are used in this analysis. The 562,000 square foot reduction in the amount of commercial development and 1,025 unit increase in residential development would decrease demand compared to the land uses allowed by the Adopted Specific Plan by 796,105 kWh per year, as shown in Table 19:

Electricity Demand and a greater decrease from the approximately 65 million kilowatt-hours per year estimate in Addendum 12 for the Adopted Specific Plan. This represents a decrease of 1.6 percent from the 50,904,039 kWh per year electrical demand estimate for the Project under the adopted Specific Plan.

Table 19
Electricity Demand
Scenario
Quantity
(kWh/year)
Adopted Specific Plana 50,904,039
Proposed Specific Plan Amendmenta 50,107,934
Difference from Adopted Specific Plan -796,105
kWh = kilowatt-hours a Energy calculations are provided in Appendix C.

This decrease in electrical demand can be accommodated by Southern California Edison. In addition, individual building projects within the Specific Plan Area would be required to comply with the Energy Building Regulations adopted by the California Energy Commission (Title 24 of the California Administrative Code), which have been upgraded since preparation of the Final EIR. For these reasons, no new significant impacts on electrical supply or service will result from the Specific Plan Amendment as proposed.

The 562,000 square foot reduction in the amount of commercial development and 1,025 unit increase in residential development with the residential development option chosen would incrementally increase annual natural gas demand compared to the Adopted Specific Plan by 14,798,510 cf per year, as shown in Table 20: Natural Gas Demand.

This represents an incremental increase of 20.1 percent from the 73.5 million cubic feet (mcf) per year natural gas demand estimate for land uses allowed by the Adopted Specific Plan. Overall, natural gas demand would be much less than identified in the Final EIR and Addendum 12 as a result of increased efficiency due to changes in energy efficiency standards. The proposed land uses in the Specific Plan Area 666

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-53 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
would be within the service capacity of SoCalGas which is anticipated to have an available capacity of approximately 3,225 mcf of natural gas per day (or 1,177,125 mcf per year) in 2028, which is assumed as the year the Specific Plan would build out.26 Furthermore, the future uses on the Project site would be required to comply with Title 24 of the California Administrative Code. As such, no new significant impacts to natural gas service would result and no mitigation measures are required.

Table 20
Natural Gas Demand
Scenario
Quantity
(cf/year)
Adopted Specific Plana 73,492,310
Proposed Specific Plan Amendmenta 88,290,820
Difference from Adopted Specific Plan 14,798,510

cf = cubic feet
a
Energy calculations are provided in Appendix C.

Development of the proposed scenarios presented in Table 5 would consist of include commercial and residential development in Districts (B, C and D). All three districts are currently designated for commercial and some residential uses. Future projects within the Specific Plan Area in Districts B, C and D would be within the long-term source and distribution planning of SoCal Gas and individual building projects within the Specific Plan Area are required to comply with the Energy Building Regulations adopted by the California Energy Commission (Title 24 of the California Administrative Code) as mitigation against the wasteful use of energy.

3.20 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums Archeological and historic resource surveys of the Specific Plan Area were completed. The archeological survey included a records search and a field survey. No sites of any kind had been previously recorded within the study area or adjacent properties, and no new sites were discovered during the Phase I survey.

A low-density, mixed scatter of historical debris, possibly dating between 1879 and 1884, was found southeast of Myrtle Street (now named Riverpark Boulevard) and El Rio Drive. This was an open lot in a disturbed state as a result of the demolition of structures that had been present on this parcel. 26 California Gas and Electric Utilities, 2020 California Gas Report, Accessed December 2021, https://www.socalgas.com/sites/default/files/202010/2020_California_Gas_Report_Joint_Utility_Biennial_Comprehensive _Filing.pdf.
667

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-54 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021
Development of the proposed Project would result in grading and earthwork at this location that had the potential to impact a potential historical deposit.

All existing structures within the Specific Plan Area were reviewed for possible historical significance. The historic resource study identified 33 existing buildings and structures on the Project site that would be demolished. Eighteen of these buildings, including 16 buildings in the Ventura County El Rio Maintenance Yard, and an existing home and a commercial showroom building on El Rio Drive, were determined not to eligible as historic resources as defined by the CEQA because they were not 50 or more years of age. Three other residential structures and the buildings on the mine site were surveyed and researched to determine whether any of these structures were historically significant. This research found that five of the existing buildings on the mine site, including an office building, garage, and three metal storage buildings, are of sufficient age to be potential historic resources. In this case, these five buildings and structures were associated with an industry that has made a significant contribution to the physical development of Ventura County through the construction of roads, bases, airfields, and buildings. While these existing structures are not eligible for listing on the national or State registers of historical resources, they were identified as potentially eligible for listing as Ventura County Landmarks, a designation that has no integrity criteria. For this reason, these five structures were identified as having local historical significance, and demolition was identified as a significant impact.

Mitigation measures were identified to mitigate all potential impacts to archeological resources to a less than significant level. Historic documentation of the buildings on the mine site prior to demolition was determined to mitigate this impact to the fullest extent feasible. As this mitigation would not mitigate this impact to a less than significant level, the loss of these structures was identified as an unavoidable significant impact of the Project and no update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
Mass grading of the Specific Plan Area has been completed and all mitigation measures related to cultural resources have been implemented. Any additional ground disturbances would be subject to the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR. The proposed change in land uses in portions of the Specific Plan Area will not, therefore, result in any new or substantially more severe impacts to cultural resources and no revised mitigation measures are required.

Development within Districts B, C and D with any of the scenarios in Table 5 would be subject to the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR. As such, the combinations of residential and commercial development would not create significant impacts to cultural resources and no further analysis is required. 668

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-55 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

3.21 HAZARDS
Summary of Analysis in the Final EIR and Subsequent Addendums A series of Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) reports were prepared for the properties included in the proposed Specific Plan Area to determine the potential for impacts related to the presence and use of hazardous materials by existing and historical uses within and around the Specific Plan Area. These risks are primarily associated with the potential for on-site hazards from abandoned oil wells, storage of materials categorized as hazardous under existing regulations, underground and aboveground storage tanks, and the operations of facilities historically located within the boundaries of the proposed Specific Plan Area.

Analysis of soils in the agricultural portions of the Specific Plan Area determined that no significant concentrations of herbicides or pesticides are present in the soils. These studies determined that the Specific Plan Area contained several abandoned oil wells that may need to be re-abandoned to current standards. In addition, the existing buildings on the site that would be demolished were of sufficient age to contain asbestos building materials and lead paint. Demolition of these structures in conformance with existing regulations would mitigate any potential impacts. Mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant hazardous impacts to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant hazardous impacts were identified in the Final EIR. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
As noted above, the hazards potentially located within the boundaries of the Specific Plan Area are primarily associated with the potential for on-site hazards from abandoned oil wells, storage of materials categorized as hazardous under existing regulations, underground and aboveground storage tanks, and the operations of facilities historically located on the site. The proposed Specific Plan amendment would not place people or structures within areas not previously analyzed in the Final EIR. In addition, no new types of land uses are proposed by the amendment. The mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR are applicable, and no new or substantially more severe hazardous material impacts would occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and no revised mitigation measures are required.

Development of any of the scenarios identified in Table 5 would be subject to the mitigation measures subject to hazardous materials as stated in the Final EIR which would mitigate all potentially significant hazardous impacts to less than significant.
669

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-56 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

3.22 WILDFIRE
This topic was not on the CEQA initial study checklist when the Certified Final EIR was prepared, and for this reason, no analysis was included in the Certified Final EIR. Analysis of the currently adopted Specific Plan is provided below to serve as comparative analysis.

Analysis of Adopted Specific Plan
The Specific Plan Area is located within an area designated as a low wildland fire hazard area, therefore no significant risks from wildland fires are anticipated.27 The Specific Plan Area is surrounded by urban development toward the south, east, and northwest. The Santa Clara River lies directly to the west, separated from the Specific Plan Area by an existing levee. North of the Specific Plan Area mine pits, industrial uses, and a detention center.

The developed areas around the Specific Plan Area would mitigate potential wildfire risk. A change in elevation provided by the Santa Clara River west of the Specific Plan Area would act as a natural a buffer from potential wildfire risk. The river contains moderate amounts of native riparian vegetation dispersed along braided river channels which would not pose a significant fire risk. Mine pits and industrial uses would not pose any potential wildfire risks to the Specific Plan Area. The proposed change in land uses in portions of the Specific Plan Area will not, therefore, result in any new or substantially more severe impacts to wildfire and no mitigation measures are required.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
As noted above, the Specific Plan Area is not located in an area where significant risks from wildland fires are anticipated. The proposed Specific Plan amendment would not place people or structures within areas not previously analyzed in the Final EIR. In addition, no new types of land uses are proposed by the amendment. No new or substantially more severe wildfire impacts would occur as a result of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment and no additional mitigation measures are required. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Development of any of the commercial and residential use options identified in Table 5 would involve development of sites in low wildland fire hazard areas. As such, any combination of commercial and residential development in Districts B, C, and D would result in less than significant wildfire impacts. 27 Fire Hazard Severity Zones in SRA – Ventura County, Cal Fire, November 7, 2007, https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6848/fhszs_map56.pdf. Accessed December 2021. 670

3.0 Impact Analysis
City of Oxnard 3.0-57 RiverPark Project Final EIR Addendum No. 15 Meridian Consultants December 2021

3.23 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
This topic was not on the CEQA initial study checklist when the Certified Final EIR was prepared, and for this reason, no analysis was included in the Certified Final EIR. Analysis of the currently adopted Specific Plan is provided below to serve as comparative analysis.

Analysis of Adopted Specific Plan
As discussed above under Section 3.20: Cultural Resources, archeological resource surveys of the Specific Plan Area were completed. No new sites were discovered during the Phase I survey and no sites of any kind had been previously recorded within the study area or adjacent properties. However, a low density, mixed scatter of historical debris, possibly dating between 1879 and 1884, was found in the southeastern extreme of the study area, southeast of Myrtle Street (now named RiverPark Boulevard) and El Rio Drive.

This was an open lot in a disturbed state as a result of the demolition of structures that had been present on this parcel. Development of the proposed Project would result in grading and earthwork at this location that had the potential to impact a potential historical deposit.

This area lacked historical remains in sufficient quantity and with adequate integrity to warrant the recording of historical site; however, it is possible that a buried archaeological deposit may have been present at this location. Development of the proposed Project would result in grading and earthwork at this location that may have impacted a potential archaeological deposit. Mitigation measures were identified in the Final EIR to mitigate all potentially significant impacts to cultural resources to a less than significant level and no unavoidable significant impacts to cultural resources were identified in the Final EIR. These mitigation measures would also apply to tribal cultural resources. No update to this analysis or conclusions was provided in any subsequent addendums.

Analysis of Proposed Specific Plan Amendment
As discussed above under Section 3.20: Cultural Resources, mass grading of the Specific Plan Area has been completed and all mitigation measures related to cultural resources that have been implemented would apply to any tribal cultural resources. The proposed change in land uses in portions of the Specific Plan Area will not, therefore, result in any new or substantially more severe impacts to tribal cultural resources and no revised mitigation measures are required.

Development within Districts B, C and D would be subject to the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR. For this reason, any combination of commercial and residential development in Districts B, C, and D would result in less than significant impacts.
671

APPENDIX A
Traffic Impact Analysis
672

MEMORANDUM
TO: Ann Walsh, Shea Properties
FROM: Sean Mohn, Casey Le, P.E., and Janet Ye, EIT
DATE: December 2, 2021
RE: Traffic Impact Assessment for the
Proposed Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment 2021
Oxnard, California Ref: J1031c
The RiverPark Specific Plan, as originally adopted and analyzed in the City of Oxnard’s (City) certified Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the RiverPark Project, allowed the development of up to 2,805 residential units and 2.485 million square feet of commercial development (Original RiverPark Specific Plan).

Since the certification of this Final EIR, a series of amendments to the Original RiverPark Specific Plan have been approved and adopted by the City. Addendum 12 to the RiverPark Final EIR evaluated the latest amendment to the Original RiverPark Specific Plan involving changes to the land use program. With approval of this amendment in June 2012, the Adopted RiverPark Specific Plan allows the development of up to 3,043 residential units and

2.089 million square feet of commercial uses.

An amendment is currently proposed that would allow the option of developing additional residential units in three of the commercial/mixed-planning districts within the Adopted RiverPark Specific Plan. This proposed amendment would increase the amount residential units allowed to 4.068 units and decrease the amount of commercial development permitted to 1.536 million square feet.

Gibson Transportation Consulting, Inc. (GTC) conducted a traffic impact assessment to determine whether any new significant traffic impacts or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified significant impacts in the City’s certified Final EIR for the Original RiverPark Specific Plan would result from the currently proposed amendment to the Adopted RiverPark Specific Plan. This memorandum summarizes the results of the assessment.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan established a series of planning districts for the purposes of regulating land uses within the Specific Plan area.

The program of land uses allowed by the Original RiverPark Specific Plan as evaluated in the certified Final EIR and the proposed Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment 2021 and the proposed Oxnard Riverpark Specific Plan Amendment 2021 are detailed below. 673
Ann Walsh
December 2, 2021

Original Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan
Planning Districts A, B, & C
 440 Apartments
 360,000 square feet (sf) of Retail (Regional Commercial)  320 Hotel Rooms
 421,000 sf of Office
Planning District D – The Collection
 300 Apartments
 1,129,000 sf of Retail (Regional Commercial)
 Park (3.5 acres)
Planning District E
 40,000 sf of Retail (Regional Commercial)
 8,000 sf of Light Industrial
Planning District F
 328 Multi-Family Residential Units
 140 Apartments
 5,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Park (10.1 acres)
Planning District G
 Elementary School (538 Students)
 415 Multi-Family Residential Units
 15,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Park (2.8 acres)
Planning District H
 460 Single-Family Residential Units
 Park (3.3 acres)
Planning District I
 159 Single-Family Residential Units
 318 Multi-Family Residential Units
 10,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Park (13.8 acres)
Planning District J
 130 Single-Family Residential Units
 28 Multi-Family Residential Units
 10,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Elementary/Middle School (1,145 Students)
 Park (10.0 acres)
674
Ann Walsh
December 2, 2021

Planning Districts K, L, M
 74 Single-Family Residential Units
 13 Multi-Family Residential Units
 5,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Fire Station (19,000 sf)
 Open Space (226.0 acres)
Proposed Oxnard Riverpark Specific Plan Amendment 2021
Planning Districts A, B, & C
 1,053 Apartments
 75,267 sf of Retail (Regional Commercial)
 320 Hotel Rooms
 421,000 sf of Office
Planning District D – The Collection
 924 Apartments
 812,060 sf of Retail (Regional Commercial)
Park (3.5 acres)
Planning District E
 46,000 sf of Retail (Regional Commercial)
 8,000 sf of Light Industrial
Planning District F
 328 Multi-Family Residential Units
 140 Apartments
 5,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Park (10.1 acres)
Planning District G
 Elementary School (538 Students)
 415 Multi-Family Residential Units
 15,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Park (2.8 acres)
Planning District H
 486 Single-Family Residential Units
 Park (3.3 acres)
Planning District I
 159 Single-Family Residential Units
 318 Multi-Family Residential Units
 10,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Park (13.8 acres)
675
Ann Walsh
December 2, 2021

Planning District J
 130 Single-Family Residential Units
 28 Multi-Family Residential Units
 10,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Elementary/Middle School (1,145 Students)
 Park (10.0 acres)
Planning Districts K, L, M
 74 Single-Family Residential Units
 13 Multi-Family Residential Units
 5,000 sf of Retail (Neighborhood Commercial)
 Fire Station (19,000 sf)
 Open Space (226.0 acres)

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
To determine whether any new significant traffic impacts or substantial increases in the severity of previously identified significant impacts in the City’s certified Final EIR for the Original RiverPark Specific Plan would result at any of the 30 study intersections evaluated in the Final EIR based on the proposed land use program revisions and the future Year 2030 intersection level of service (LOS) results documented in Traffic Analysis for Oxnard Riverpark Specific Plan Amendment for the Adopted Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan, GTC conducted a comparative analysis of the Original Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan land use program and the proposed Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment 2021 land use program trip generation estimates.

Trip Generation Analysis
For the purposes of this analysis, the number of vehicle trips expected to be generated by each land use land use program were estimated based on the rates utilized within the Oxnard Traffic Model and/or the rates published in Trip Generation, 10th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2017).

As detailed in Table 1, as analyzed in the Final EIR, the Original Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan land use program would result in the following:
 82,366 Daily Trips
 4,710 AM Peak Hour Trips
 7,749 PM Peak Hour Trips
As detailed in Table 2, the proposed Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment 2021 land use program would result in the following:

 73,057 Daily Trips
 4,932 AM Peak Hour Trips
 6,987 PM Peak Hour Trips
676
Ann Walsh
December 2, 2021

Based on the trip generation estimates detailed above, when compared to the Original Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan land use program, as analyzed in the certified Final EIR, the proposed Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment 2021 land use program would result in a reduction of 9,309 daily trips (approximately 11.3%) and 762 PM peak hour trips (approximately 9.8%), which is substantial, and an incremental increase of 222 AM peak hour trips (approximately

4.7%), which is effectively negligible from an analysis standpoint when considering the size of the study area and the resulting distribution of those trips across the 30 study intersections evaluated in the Final EIR.

Intersection Operating Conditions Analysis
As previously discussed, when compared to the Original Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan, the proposed Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment 2021 land use program would result significant daily and PM peak hour trip reductions, and an incremental AM peak hour trip increase of approximately 4.7%.

Based on the future Year 2030 intersection LOS results documented in Traffic Analysis for Oxnard Riverpark Specific Plan Amendment for the Original Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan and detailed in Table 3, it is readily apparent that the proposed Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment 2021 would not generate any new significant traffic impacts or substantially increase already identified significant impacts beyond those previously identified in the Final EIR, as the amount of additional trips required to yield those results is far in excess of the 4.7% increase associated with the AM peak hour trip generation estimates.

For comparative purposes, and in consultation with City of Oxnard staff, GTC also conducted an intersection LOS analysis at seven of the 30 study intersections evaluated in the Final EIR for Year 2019 conditions based on Year 2019 traffic volumes and intersection lane configurations.

The peak hour intersection turning movement volumes, which were collected at each of the seven key intersections in September 2019, are provided in Attachment A.

As detailed in Table 3, the LOS results for all seven intersections are within the acceptable range (LOS C or better) based on City of Oxnard criteria and are generally consistent with the intersection LOS conditions forecasted in Traffic Analysis for Oxnard Riverpark Specific Plan Amendment, which further supports the assertion that analysis assumptions therein are still accurate and the conclusions are still valid. The LOS analysis worksheets are provided in Attachment B.

CONCLUSION
Based on the analysis results detailed above, it is our professional opinion that the proposed Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment 2021 land use program would not generate any new significant traffic impacts or substantially increase already identified significant impacts beyond those previously identified in the Final EIR. Furthermore, based on the substantial daily and PM peak hour trip reductions, the proposed land use program would be significantly less impactful than the Original Oxnard RiverPark Specific Plan land use program, as analyzed in the certified Final EIR.
677
TABLE 1

TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES - ORIGINAL OXNARD RIVERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN

TRIP GENERATION RATES
In Out Total In Out Total
ITE (Single-Family Detached Housing) 1 Single-Family Residential 9.57 25% 75% 0.75 63% 37% 1.01 SANDAG (Condominium) 2 Multi-Family Residential 8.00 25% 75% 0.67 58% 42% 0.78 ITE (Apartment) 3 Apartment 6.72 20% 80% 0.51 65% 35% 0.62 ITE (Shopping Center) 7 Neighborhood Commercial 60.00 61% 39% 1.44 48% 52% 5.23 ITE (Shopping Center) 9 Regional Commercial 30.00 61% 39% 0.72 48% 52% 2.61 ITE (Hotel) 11 Motel/Hotel 8.17 61% 39% 0.56 53% 47% 0.59 ITE (100 TSF General Office Building) 12 Office 13.50 88% 12% 1.89 17% 83% 1.82 SANDAG (Government Office) 13 Government Office 30.00 90% 10% 2.70 30% 70% 3.60 SANDAG (Avg. of Industrial Park & Warehousing) 16 Light/General Industrial 6.50 76% 24% 0.76 29% 71% 0.86 ITE (Elementary School) 19 Elementary/Middle School 1.29 55% 45% 0.42 47% 53% 0.15 ITE (County Park) 26 Park 2.28 100% 0% 0.01 33% 67% 0.06 Not Applicable 36 Open Space 0.00 0% 0% 0.00 0% 0% 0.00

TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES
In Out Total In Out Total
A, B, C 229
3 Apartment 440 du 2,957 44 180 224 176 97 273
9 Regional Commercial 360 ksf 10,800 158 101 259 450 490 940 11 Hotel 320 rooms 2,614 109 70 179 99 90 189
12 Office 421 ksf 5,684 699 97 796 131 636 767
22,055 1,010 448 1,458 856 1,313 2,169
D 259
3 Apartment 300 du 2,016 30 123 153 120 66 186
9 Regional Commercial 1,129 ksf 33,870 497 316 813 1,411 1,535 2,946 26 Park 3.5 acre 8 000000
35,894 527 439 966 1,531 1,601 3,132
E 260
9 Regional Commercial 40 ksf 1,200 18 11 29 50 54 104
16 Light/General Industrial 8 ksf 52 516257
1,252 23 12 35 52 59 111
F 258
2 Multi-Family Residential 328 du 2,624 56 164 220 148 108 256 3 Apartment 140 du 941 14 57 71 56 31 87
7 Neighborhood Commercial 5 ksf 300 4 3 7 13 13 26
26 Park 10.1 acre 23 000011
3,888 74 224 298 217 153 370
G 261
19 Elementary School 538 students 694 124 102 226 38 43 81 694 124 102 226 38 43 81
G 262
2 Multi-Family Residential 415 ksf 3,320 71 208 279 187 137 324 7 Neighborhood Commercial 15.00 ksf 900 13 8 21 38 41 79 26 Park 2.8 acre 6 000000
4,226 84 216 300 225 178 403
H 265
1 Single-Family Residential 460 du 4,402 87 258 345 294 170 464 26 Park 3.3 acre 8 000000
4,410 87 258 345 294 170 464
I 264
1 Single-Family Residential 159 du 1,522 30 89 119 101 60 161 2 Multi-Family Residential 318 du 2,544 54 159 213 144 104 248 7 Neighborhood Commercial 10 ksf 600 9 6 15 25 27 52
26 Park 13.8 acre 31 000011
4,697 93 254 347 270 192 462
J 263
1 Single-Family Residential 130 du 1,244 25 73 98 83 48 131 2 Multi-Family Residential 28 du 224 5 14 19 13 9 22
7 Neighborhood Commercial 10 ksf 600 9 6 15 25 27 52
19 Elementary/Middle School 1,145 students 1,477 263 218 481 80 92 172 26 Park 10 acre 23 000000
3,568 302 311 613 201 176 377
K, L, M 266
1 Single-Family Residential 74 du 708 14 41 55 47 28 75 2 Multi-Family Residential 13 du 104 2 7 9 6 4 10
7 Neighborhood Commercial 5 ksf 300 4 3 7 13 14 27
13 Fire Station 19 ksf 570 46 5 51 21 47 68
36 Open Space 226 acre 0 000000
1,682 66 56 122 87 93 180
82,366 2,390 2,320 4,710 3,771 3,978 7,749
Notes:
du=dwelling unit
ksf = 1,000 square feet
Land Use
No. Rate Daily
Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour
Land Use Description
du
du
du
Size
ksf
ksf
ksf
rooms
ksf
Daily
Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour

TOTAL - PROPOSED PROJECT TRIPS
SUBTOTAL - [G]
Land Use
No.

Planning
District TAZ No. Land Use Description
SUBTOTAL - [K, L, M]
SUBTOTAL - [D]
ksf
student
acre
acre
Source (Oxard Traffic Model)
SUBTOTAL - [H]
SUBTOTAL - [J]
SUBTOTAL - [E]
SUBTOTAL - [F]
SUBTOTAL - [A, B, C]
SUBTOTAL - [G]
SUBTOTAL - [I]
678
TABLE 2
TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES - OXNARD RIVERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 2021

TRIP GENERATION RATES
In Out Total In Out Total
ITE (Single-Family Detached Housing) 1 Single-Family Residential 9.57 25% 75% 0.75 63% 37% 1.01 SANDAG (Condominium) 2 Multi-Family Residential 8.00 25% 75% 0.67 58% 42% 0.78 ITE (Apartment) 3 Apartment 6.72 20% 80% 0.51 65% 35% 0.62 ITE (Shopping Center) 7 Neighborhood Commercial 60.00 61% 39% 1.44 48% 52% 5.23 ITE (Shopping Center) 9 Regional Commercial 30.00 61% 39% 0.72 48% 52% 2.61 ITE (Hotel) 11 Motel/Hotel 8.17 61% 39% 0.56 53% 47% 0.59 ITE (100 TSF General Office Building) 12 Office 13.50 88% 12% 1.89 17% 83% 1.82 SANDAG (Government Office) 13 Government Office 30.00 90% 10% 2.70 30% 70% 3.60 SANDAG (Avg. of Industrial Park & Warehousing) 16 Light/General Industrial 6.50 76% 24% 0.76 29% 71% 0.86 ITE (Elementary School) 19 Elementary/Middle School 1.29 55% 45% 0.42 47% 53% 0.15 ITE (County Park) 26 Park 2.28 100% 0% 0.01 33% 67% 0.06 Not Applicable 36 Open Space 0.00 0% 0% 0.00 0% 0% 0.00

TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES
In Out Total In Out Total
A, B, C 229
3 Apartment 1,053 du 7,076 107 430 537 424 229 653
9 Regional Commercial 75.267 ksf 2,258 33 21 54 94 102 196 11 Hotel 320 rooms 2,614 109 70 179 100 89 189
12 Office 421.000 ksf 5,684 700 96 796 131 636 767
17,632 949 617 1,566 749 1,056 1,805
D 259
3 Apartment 924 du 6,209 94 377 471 372 201 573
9 Regional Commercial 812.060 ksf 24,362 357 228 585 1,017 1,102 2,119 26 Park 3.5 acre 8 000000
30,579 451 605 1,056 1,389 1,303 2,692
E 260
9 Regional Commercial 46.000 ksf 1,380 20 13 33 58 62 120 16 Light/General Industrial 8 ksf 52 516257
1,432 25 14 39 60 67 127
F 258
2 Multi-Family Residential 328 du 2,624 55 165 220 148 108 256 3 Apartment 140 du 941 14 57 71 57 30 87
7 Neighborhood Commercial 5 ksf 300 4 3 7 12 14 26
26 Park 10.1 acre 23 000011
3,888 73 225 298 217 153 370
G 261
19 Elementary School 538 students 694 124 102 226 38 43 81 694 124 102 226 38 43 81
G 262
2 Multi-Family Residential 415 ksf 3,320 70 208 278 188 136 324 7 Neighborhood Commercial 15.00 ksf 900 13 8 21 38 41 79 26 Park 2.8 acre 6 000000
4,226 83 216 299 226 177 403
H 265
1 Single-Family Residential 486 du 4,651 92 273 365 309 181 490 26 Park 3.3 acre 8 000000
4,659 92 273 365 309 181 490
I 264
1 Single-Family Residential 159 du 1,522 30 89 119 101 60 161 2 Multi-Family Residential 318 du 2,544 54 159 213 144 104 248 7 Neighborhood Commercial 10 ksf 600 9 6 15 25 27 52
26 Park 13.8 acre 31 000011
4,697 93 254 347 270 192 462
J 263
1 Single-Family Residential 130 du 1,244 25 73 98 83 48 131 2 Multi-Family Residential 28 du 224 5 14 19 13 9 22
7 Neighborhood Commercial 10 ksf 600 9 6 15 25 27 52
19 Elementary/Middle School 1,145 students 1,477 265 216 481 80 92 172 26 Park 10 acre 23 000000
3,568 304 309 613 201 176 377
K, L, M 266
1 Single-Family Residential 74 du 708 14 42 56 47 28 75 2 Multi-Family Residential 13 du 104 2 7 9 6 4 10
7 Neighborhood Commercial 5 ksf 300 4 3 7 13 14 27
13 Fire Station 19 ksf 570 46 5 51 21 47 68
36 Open Space 226 acre 0 000000
1,682 66 57 123 87 93 180
73,057 2,260 2,672 4,932 3,546 3,441 6,987
Notes:
du=dwelling unit
ksf = 1,000 square feet
Source (Oxnard Traffic Model) Land Use
No. Land Use Description Rate
Afternoon Peak Hour
du
du
du
Daily
Morning Peak Hour
ksf
ksf
rooms
ksf
ksf
ksf
student
acre
acre
Planning
District TAZ No. Land Use No. Land Use Description Size Daily Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour
SUBTOTAL - [A, B, C]
SUBTOTAL - [F]
SUBTOTAL - [D]
SUBTOTAL - [E]
SUBTOTAL - [G]
SUBTOTAL - [G]
SUBTOTAL - [J]
SUBTOTAL - [I]
SUBTOTAL - [H]
SUBTOTAL - [K, L, M]

TOTAL - PROPOSED PROJECT TRIPS
679
TABLE 3

INTERSECTION OPERATING CONDITIONS - COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Year 2019 Conditions [a] Year 2030 [b]
Year 2030 with Original
Oxnard Riverpark Specific
Plan [b]
Year 2030 with Original
Oxnard Riverpark Specific
Plan
PLUS Mitigation [b]
V/C or Delay
[c] LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS

1. Los Angeles Avenue & AM 0.682 B 0.705 C
Vineyard Avenue PM 0.642 B 0.766 C

2. Central Avenue & AM 0.501 A 0.553 A
Vineyard Avenue PM 0.412 A 0.517 A

3. Thames River Boulevard/Simon Way AM 0.412 A 0.578 A
Vineyard Avenue PM 0.446 A 0.703 C

4. Oxnard Boulevard & AM 0.081 A 0.466 A
Forest Park Boulevard PM 0.088 A 0.589 A

5. Garonne Street/Riverpark Boulevard & AM 0.108 A 0.484 A Forest Park Boulevard PM 0.098 A 0.602 B

6. Vineyard Avenue & AM 0.386 A 0.709 C
Forest Park Boulevard PM 0.376 A 0.786 C

7. Vineyard Avenue & AM 0.454 A 0.503 A
Stroube Street PM 0.526 A 0.559 A

8. Ventura Road & AM 0.51 A 0.104 A 0.439 A
Town Center Drive PM 0.53 A 0.226 A 0.528 A

9. Oxnard Boulevard & AM 0.66 B 0.491 A 0.389 A
Town Center Drive PM 0.56 A 0.488 A 0.561 A

10. Vineyard Avenue & AM 26.2 C 0.464 A 0.501 A
Riverpark Boulevard/Ventura Boulevard PM 29.0 C 0.541 A 0.604 B

11. Oxnard Boulevard & AM 23.9 C 0.324 A 0.436 A
US 101 Northbound Ramps PM 26.0 C 0.471 A 0.635 B

12. Oxnard Boulevard & AM 21.4 C 0.176 A 0.284 A
US 101 Southbound Ramps PM 22.4 C 0.206 A 0.368 A

13. Vineyard Avenue & AM 13.4 B 0.527 A 0.643 B
US 101 Northbound Ramps PM 14.1 B 0.659 B 0.747 C

14. Vineyard Avenue & AM 17.2 B 0.516 A 0.537 A
US 101 Southbound Ramps PM 14.7 B 0.568 A 0.759 C

15. Ventura Road & AM 0.339 A 0.412 A
Wagon Wheel Road PM 0.333 A 0.592 A

16. Ventura Road & AM 0.039 A 0.592 A
US 101 Southbound Off-Ramp PM 0.066 A 0.706 C

17. Oxnard Boulevard & AM 0.294 A 0.806 D 0.659 B
Esplanade Center/Spur Drive PM 0.481 A 0.950 E 0.725 C

18. Vineyard Avenue & AM 0.484 A 0.554 A
Ventura Road PM 0.616 B 0.791 C

19. Vineyard Avenue & AM 0.439 A 0.543 A
Ventura Road PM 0.484 A 0.592 A

20. Vineyard Avenue & AM 0.712 C 0.730 C
Oxnard Boulevard PM 0.729 C 0.876 D

21. Gonzales Road & AM 0.545 A 0.847 D 0.651 B
Ventura Road PM 0.731 C 0.990 E 0.776 C

22. Gonzales Road & AM 0.697 B 0.814 D 0.709 C
Oxnard Boulevard PM 0.829 D 0.916 E 0.899 D

23. Victoria Avenue & AM 0.472 A 0.640 B
Telephone Road PM 0.607 B 0.761 C

24. Victoria Avenue & AM 0.512 A 0.700 B
Ralston Street PM 0.591 A 0.774 C

25. Victoria Avenue & AM 0.519 A 0.846 D
US 101 Northbound Ramps PM 0.618 B 0.736 C

26. US 101 Southbound Ramps & AM 0.403 A 0.481 A
Valentine Road PM 0.442 A 0.541 A

27. Victoria Avenue & AM 0.409 A 0.721 C
Valentine Road PM 0.601 B 0.819 D

28. Ralston Street & AM 0.514 A 0.453 A
Johnson Drive PM 0.612 B 0.550 A

29. Johnson Drive & AM 0.717 C 0.751 C
Bristol Road PM 0.731 C 0.743 C

30. Johnson Drive & AM 0.553 A 0.700 B
North Bank Drive PM 0.556 A 0.856 D
Notes
[a] Based on traffic count data collected in September 2019 and existing 2019 lane configurations. [b] Source: Traffic Analysis for Oxnard Riverpark Specific Plan Amendment, Crain & Associates, October 2009. [c] Intersections under Caltrans jurisdiction were evaluated using HCM methodology.

No Intersection Peak Hour
680
Attachment A
Traffic Counts
681
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 9:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S VENTURA ROAD

E/W TOWN CENTER DRIVE
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-715 1 51 13 0 8 1 44 0 144 66 2 0 0 0 0 0 330
715-730 0 49 28 0 4 5 51 0 246 99 7 0 0 0 0 0 489
730-745 0 74 44 0 25 10 60 0 242 123 14 0 0 1 0 0 593
745-800 1 77 88 5 30 23 61 0 251 171 12 0 1 2 0 0 722
800-815 1 66 80 6 19 13 66 0 218 134 11 0 1 2 0 0 617
815-830 3 66 44 1 13 18 68 0 196 88 7 0 0 0 0 0 504
830-845 1 44 23 2 11 19 56 1 150 72 8 0 0 2 1 0 390
845-900 3 31 25 1 9 10 57 0 154 65 9 0 0 3 0 0 367
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-800 2 251 173 5 67 39 216 0 883 459 35 0 1 3 0 0 2134 715-815 2 266 240 11 78 51 238 0 957 527 44 0 2 5 0 0 2421 730-830 5 283 256 12 87 64 255 0 907 516 44 0 2 5 0 0 2436 745-845 6 253 235 14 73 73 251 1 815 465 38 0 2 6 1 0 2233 800-900 8 207 172 10 52 60 247 1 718 359 35 0 1 7 1 0 1878

PEAK HOUR
87 64
406
255
5 283 256 12
0 0
0 44 516 907
0 TOWN CENTER DRIVE 7
5 2 VENTURA ROAD

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-715 00000 700-715 00000
715-730 00000 715-730 01001
730-745 20002 730-745 00000
745-800 00000 745-800 00123
800-815 00000 800-815 01001
815-830 00022 815-830 00000
830-845 00000 830-845 02002
845-900 01001 845-900 10001

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-800 20002 700-800 01124
715-815 20002 715-815 02125
730-830 20024 730-830 01124
745-845 00022 745-845 03126
800-900 01023 800-900 13004
556
730-830
1467
682
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S VENTURA ROAD

E/W TOWN CENTER DRIVE
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-415 1 71 32 0 5 4 88 0 145 82 2 0 0 11 5 0 446
415-430 1 70 22 3 8 6 107 0 140 113 2 0 1 6 2 0 481
430-445 0 76 34 0 9 7 127 0 169 88 0 0 1 10 0 0 521
445-500 0 90 25 0 8 2 104 0 150 107 4 0 3 6 1 0 500
500-515 0 110 65 1 6 2 108 0 169 116 0 0 3 23 3 0 606
515-530 0 72 24 4 9 4 112 0 140 141 3 0 1 15 1 0 526
530-545 1 91 36 0 10 3 132 0 163 70 1 0 1 7 0 0 515
545-600 1 63 24 1 4 4 153 1 158 96 3 0 0 7 0 0 515
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-500 2 307 113 3 30 19 426 0 604 390 8 0 5 33 8 0 1948 415-515 1 346 146 4 31 17 446 0 628 424 6 0 8 45 6 0 2108 430-530 0 348 148 5 32 15 451 0 628 452 7 0 8 54 5 0 2153 445-545 1 363 150 5 33 11 456 0 622 434 8 0 8 51 5 0 2147 500-600 2 336 149 6 29 13 505 1 630 423 7 0 5 52 4 0 2162

PEAK HOUR
29 13
548
505
2 336 149 6
1 0
0 7 423 630
4 TOWN CENTER DRIVE 61
52 5 VENTURA ROAD

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-415 00000 400-415 00000
415-430 00000 415-430 00000
430-445 00000 430-445 00011
445-500 00000 445-500 00000
500-515 00000 500-515 00000
515-530 00000 515-530 00000
530-545 00000 530-545 00000
545-600 00000 545-600 00011

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-500 00000 400-500 00011
415-515 00000 415-515 00011
430-530 00000 430-530 00011
445-545 00000 445-545 00000
500-600 00000 500-600 00011

APPROACH SUMMARIES

APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT
400-500 425 431 475 750 1002 738 46 29
415-515 497 465 494 819 1058 800 59 24
430-530 501 494 498 830 1087 807 67 22
445-545 519 477 500 823 1064 827 64 20
500-600 493 462 548 832 1060 846 61 22

WEST APRCH
493
500-600
1060

NORTH APRCH EAST APRCH SOUTH APRCH
683
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 9:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S OXNARD BOULEVARD

E/W TOWN CENTER DRIVE
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-715 5 124 2 0 2 11 38 0 43 44 38 0 181 19 1 0 508
715-730 11 149 3 0 3 13 39 0 45 44 57 0 235 26 4 0 629
730-745 5 190 2 0 3 18 38 0 68 59 70 0 270 26 8 0 757
745-800 10 174 2 0 2 12 39 0 68 105 103 0 310 41 14 0 880 800-815 16 159 3 1 1 23 41 0 79 72 75 0 226 29 12 0 737 815-830 8 125 5 0 5 21 32 0 81 56 73 0 189 39 10 0 644
830-845 9 119 1 0 3 22 42 0 57 50 64 0 140 25 7 0 539
845-900 8 80 5 0 2 19 44 0 54 55 61 1 152 30 12 0 523
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-800 31 637 9 0 10 54 154 0 224 252 268 0 996 112 27 0 2774 715-815 42 672 10 1 9 66 157 0 260 280 305 0 1041 122 38 0 3003 730-830 39 648 12 1 11 74 150 0 296 292 321 0 995 135 44 0 3018 745-845 43 577 11 1 11 78 154 0 285 283 315 0 865 134 43 0 2800 800-900 41 483 14 1 11 85 159 0 271 233 273 1 707 123 41 0 2443

PEAK HOUR
11 74
235
150
39 648 12 1
0 0
0 321 292 296
44 TOWN CENTER DRIVE 1174
135
995 OXNARD BOULEVARD

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-715 01001 700-715 02103
715-730 20013 715-730 00101
730-745 00000 730-745 00101
745-800 00000 745-800 00000
800-815 50005 800-815 00000
815-830 52018 815-830 00000
830-845 00101 830-845 00000
845-900 00112 845-900 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-800 21014 700-800 02305
715-815 70018 715-815 00202
730-830 10 2 0 1 13 730-830 00101
745-845 10 2 1 1 14 745-845 00000
800-900 10 2 2 2 16 800-900 00000
700
730-830
909
684
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S OXNARD BOULEVARD

E/W TOWN CENTER DRIVE
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-415 18 110 3 0 6 18 85 0 101 122 62 1 164 40 14 0 744 415-430 9 102 5 0 7 33 99 0 129 147 88 0 116 37 15 0 787 430-445 25 127 2 0 9 26 96 0 118 146 78 0 152 29 15 0 823 445-500 13 104 2 0 7 29 68 0 132 154 71 0 146 41 17 0 784 500-515 16 119 3 0 5 32 134 0 128 140 74 0 166 45 11 0 873 515-530 9 103 5 0 3 46 113 0 119 171 71 0 151 41 23 0 855 530-545 17 123 2 0 8 37 108 0 132 155 93 0 138 37 25 0 875 545-600 16 101 5 0 6 27 90 0 127 182 96 0 134 51 25 0 860 HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-500 65 443 12 0 29 106 348 0 480 569 299 1 578 147 61 0 3138 415-515 63 452 12 0 28 120 397 0 507 587 311 0 580 152 58 0 3267 430-530 63 453 12 0 24 133 411 0 497 611 294 0 615 156 66 0 3335 445-545 55 449 12 0 23 144 423 0 511 620 309 0 601 164 76 0 3387 500-600 58 446 15 0 22 142 445 0 506 648 334 0 589 174 84 0 3463

PEAK HOUR
22 142
609
445
58 446 15 0
0 0
0 334 648 506
84 TOWN CENTER DRIVE 847
174
589 OXNARD BOULEVARD

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-415 00101 400-415 00000
415-430 00000 415-430 00000
430-445 00000 430-445 00101
445-500 00101 445-500 10102
500-515 00000 500-515 01102
515-530 00000 515-530 10001
530-545 00101 530-545 01102
545-600 00000 545-600 00101

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-500 00202 400-500 10203
415-515 00101 415-515 11305
430-530 00101 430-530 21306
445-545 00202 445-545 22307
500-600 00101 500-600 12306

APPROACH SUMMARIES

APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT
400-500 520 659 483 639 1349 1370 786 470
415-515 527 673 545 671 1405 1429 790 494
430-530 528 701 568 665 1402 1479 837 490
445-545 516 719 590 687 1440 1473 841 508
500-600 519 754 609 695 1488 1480 847 534

WEST APRCH
519
500-600
1488

NORTH APRCH EAST APRCH SOUTH APRCH
685
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 9:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S OXNARD BOULEVARD
E/W US 101 NB RAMPS
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-715 191 112 0 0 58 0 27 0 0 60 130 0 0 0 0 0 578
715-730 282 120 0 0 74 0 24 0 0 76 169 0 0 0 0 0 745
730-745 338 158 0 0 82 0 32 0 0 97 212 0 0 0 0 0 919
745-800 406 159 0 0 107 0 32 0 0 138 240 0 0 0 0 0 1082 800-815 290 121 0 0 93 0 32 0 0 159 208 0 0 0 0 0 903
815-830 221 119 0 0 103 0 29 0 0 132 191 0 0 0 0 0 795
830-845 194 102 0 0 84 0 24 0 0 88 169 0 0 0 0 0 661
845-900 199 97 0 0 99 0 32 0 0 82 199 0 0 0 0 0 708
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-800 1217 549 0 0 321 0 115 0 0 371 751 0 0 0 0 0 3324 715-815 1316 558 0 0 356 0 120 0 0 470 829 0 0 0 0 0 3649 730-830 1255 557 0 0 385 0 125 0 0 526 851 0 0 0 0 0 3699 745-845 1111 501 0 0 387 0 117 0 0 517 808 0 0 0 0 0 3441 800-900 904 439 0 0 379 0 117 0 0 461 767 0 0 0 0 0 3067

PEAK HOUR
385
0 510
125
1255 557 0 0
0 0
0 851 526 0
0 US 101 NB RAMPS 0
0 0 OXNARD BOULEVARD

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-715 11002 700-715 00000
715-730 20002 715-730 02002
730-745 00000 730-745 01001
745-800 00000 745-800 00000
800-815 01001 800-815 10001
815-830 12003 815-830 10001
830-845 10001 830-845 00000
845-900 11002 845-900 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-800 31004 700-800 03003
715-815 21003 715-815 13004
730-830 13004 730-830 21003
745-845 23005 745-845 20002
800-900 34007 800-900 20002
1812
730-830
1377
686
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S OXNARD BOULEVARD
E/W US 101 NB RAMPS
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-415 192 148 0 0 128 0 42 0 0 192 194 0 0 0 0 0 896
415-430 206 163 0 0 151 0 71 0 0 218 205 1 0 0 0 0 1015 430-445 208 148 0 0 152 0 50 0 0 204 180 1 0 0 0 0 943
445-500 209 146 0 0 132 0 40 0 0 256 174 0 0 0 0 0 957
500-515 202 171 0 0 129 0 42 0 0 219 191 1 0 0 0 0 955
515-530 213 133 0 0 144 0 54 0 0 242 215 0 0 0 0 0 1001 530-545 205 165 0 0 159 0 57 0 0 223 186 0 0 0 0 0 995
545-600 219 168 0 0 199 0 56 0 0 228 165 0 0 0 0 0 1035 HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-500 815 605 0 0 563 0 203 0 0 870 753 2 0 0 0 0 3811 415-515 825 628 0 0 564 0 203 0 0 897 750 3 0 0 0 0 3870 430-530 832 598 0 0 557 0 186 0 0 921 760 2 0 0 0 0 3856 445-545 829 615 0 0 564 0 193 0 0 940 766 1 0 0 0 0 3908 500-600 839 637 0 0 631 0 209 0 0 912 757 1 0 0 0 0 3986

PEAK HOUR
631
0 840
209
839 637 0 0
0 0
1 757 912 0
0 US 101 NB RAMPS 0
0 0 OXNARD BOULEVARD

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-415 00000 400-415 00000
415-430 02002 415-430 00000
430-445 02002 430-445 00000
445-500 11002 445-500 00000
500-515 00000 500-515 00000
515-530 03003 515-530 01001
530-545 00000 530-545 00000
545-600 10001 545-600 0 -1 0 0 -1

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-500 15006 400-500 00000
415-515 15006 415-515 00000
430-530 16007 430-530 01001
445-545 14005 445-545 01001
500-600 13004 500-600 00000

APPROACH SUMMARIES

APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT
400-500 1420 1433 766 0 1625 810 0 1568
415-515 1453 1461 767 0 1650 834 0 1575
430-530 1430 1478 743 0 1683 786 0 1592
445-545 1444 1504 757 0 1707 809 0 1595
500-600 1476 1543 840 0 1670 847 0 1596

WEST APRCH
1476
500-600
1670

NORTH APRCH EAST APRCH SOUTH APRCH
687
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 9:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S OXNARD BOULEVARD
E/W US 101 SB RAMPS
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-715 0 59 74 0 0 0 0 0 28 196 0 0 97 0 49 0 503
715-730 0 55 81 0 0 0 0 0 30 227 0 0 185 1 56 0 635
730-745 0 96 90 0 0 0 0 0 28 251 0 0 273 3 57 0 798
745-800 0 104 83 0 0 0 0 0 30 339 0 0 223 3 74 0 856
800-815 0 88 66 0 0 0 0 0 22 241 0 0 174 0 78 0 669
815-830 0 70 72 0 0 0 0 0 31 237 0 0 168 1 77 0 656
830-845 0 59 83 0 0 0 0 0 45 206 0 0 145 0 66 0 604
845-900 0 81 52 0 0 0 0 0 35 207 0 0 151 0 48 0 574
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-800 0 314 328 0 0 0 0 0 116 1013 0 0 778 7 236 0 2792 715-815 0 343 320 0 0 0 0 0 110 1058 0 0 855 7 265 0 2958 730-830 0 358 311 0 0 0 0 0 111 1068 0 0 838 7 286 0 2979 745-845 0 321 304 0 0 0 0 0 128 1023 0 0 710 4 295 0 2785 800-900 0 298 273 0 0 0 0 0 133 891 0 0 638 1 269 0 2503

PEAK HOUR
0 0
0 0
0 358 311 0
0 0
0 0 1068 111
286
US 101 SB RAMPS 1131
7 838 OXNARD BOULEVARD

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-715 00112 700-715 00000
715-730 00022 715-730 00101
730-745 00000 730-745 00000
745-800 00000 745-800 00000
800-815 00101 800-815 00011
815-830 00202 815-830 00011
830-845 00022 830-845 00000
845-900 00112 845-900 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-800 00134 700-800 00101
715-815 00123 715-815 00112
730-830 00303 730-830 00022
745-845 00325 745-845 00022
800-900 00437 800-900 00022
669
730-830
1179
688
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S OXNARD BOULEVARD
E/W US 101 SB RAMPS
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-415 0 125 61 0 0 0 0 0 39 255 0 0 269 0 100 0 849
415-430 0 137 68 0 0 0 0 0 36 306 0 0 282 0 94 0 923
430-445 0 119 71 0 0 0 0 0 40 295 0 0 243 1 101 0 870
445-500 0 110 55 0 0 0 0 0 35 239 0 0 264 0 124 0 827
500-515 0 156 91 0 0 0 0 0 28 308 0 0 269 1 103 0 956
515-530 0 114 83 0 0 0 0 0 44 321 0 0 277 0 105 0 944
530-545 0 140 76 1 0 0 0 0 36 314 0 0 266 0 110 0 943
545-600 0 137 69 0 0 0 0 0 39 266 0 0 261 0 111 0 883
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-500 0 491 255 0 0 0 0 0 150 1095 0 0 1058 1 419 0 3469 415-515 0 522 285 0 0 0 0 0 139 1148 0 0 1058 2 422 0 3576 430-530 0 499 300 0 0 0 0 0 147 1163 0 0 1053 2 433 0 3597 445-545 0 520 305 1 0 0 0 0 143 1182 0 0 1076 1 442 0 3670 500-600 0 547 319 1 0 0 0 0 147 1209 0 0 1073 1 429 0 3726

PEAK HOUR
0 0
0 0
0 547 319 1
0 0
0 0 1209 147
429
US 101 SB RAMPS 1503
1 1073 OXNARD BOULEVARD

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-415 00101 400-415 00000
415-430 00101 415-430 00000
430-445 00202 430-445 00000
445-500 00101 445-500 00011
500-515 00101 500-515 00000
515-530 00202 515-530 00000
530-545 00112 530-545 00101
545-600 00000 545-600 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-500 00505 400-500 00011
415-515 00505 415-515 00011
430-530 00606 430-530 00011
445-545 00516 445-545 00112
500-600 00415 500-600 00101

APPROACH SUMMARIES

APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT
400-500 746 1514 0 406 1245 1549 1478 0
415-515 807 1570 0 426 1287 1580 1482 0
430-530 799 1596 0 449 1310 1552 1488 0
445-545 826 1625 0 449 1325 1596 1519 0
500-600 867 1639 0 467 1356 1620 1503 0

WEST APRCH
867
500-600
1356

NORTH APRCH EAST APRCH SOUTH APRCH
689
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 9:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S VINEYARD AVENUE

E/W RIVERPARK BOULEVARD
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-715 8 196 13 0 8 10 29 0 55 184 30 0 61 13 3 0 610
715-730 10 226 26 0 17 11 50 0 83 220 25 0 85 30 9 0 792 730-745 10 279 29 0 4 9 46 0 124 264 31 0 77 41 8 0 922 745-800 14 242 32 0 15 20 81 0 121 250 39 0 95 41 15 0 965 800-815 22 238 23 0 18 15 39 0 134 284 37 0 82 35 10 0 937 815-830 10 245 21 0 9 13 77 0 89 234 52 0 86 13 13 0 862 830-845 15 260 16 0 11 14 51 0 48 207 41 0 80 10 11 0 764 845-900 22 223 14 0 13 8 58 0 43 166 30 0 79 7 9 0 672
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-800 42 943 100 0 44 50 206 0 383 918 125 0 318 125 35 0 3289 715-815 56 985 110 0 54 55 216 0 462 1018 132 0 339 147 42 0 3616 730-830 56 1004 105 0 46 57 243 0 468 1032 159 0 340 130 46 0 3686 745-845 61 985 92 0 53 62 248 0 392 975 169 0 343 99 49 0 3528 800-900 69 966 74 0 51 50 225 0 314 891 160 0 327 65 43 0 3235

PEAK HOUR
46 57
346
243
56 1004 105 0
0 0
0 159 1032 468
46 RIVERPARK BOULEVARD 516
130
340 VINEYARD AVENUE

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-715 00022 700-715 00000
715-730 21014 715-730 00000
730-745 00112 730-745 00011
745-800 02002 745-800 00011
800-815 03014 800-815 10023
815-830 00011 815-830 00000
830-845 01023 830-845 00011
845-900 00000 845-900 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-800 2 3 1 4 10 700-800 00022
715-815 2 6 1 3 12 715-815 10045
730-830 05139 730-830 10045
745-845 0 6 0 4 10 745-845 10045
800-900 04048 800-900 10034
1165
730-830
1659
690
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S VINEYARD AVENUE

E/W RIVERPARK BOULEVARD
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-415 15 259 15 0 27 20 85 0 53 213 67 0 76 16 13 0 859 415-430 13 253 10 0 22 29 83 0 68 222 62 0 78 18 20 1 879 430-445 16 294 12 0 22 30 77 0 62 243 70 0 62 13 11 0 912 445-500 23 238 17 0 20 30 78 0 67 238 75 0 100 17 11 0 914 500-515 16 297 15 0 34 19 87 0 65 243 93 0 86 20 12 1 988 515-530 19 243 9 0 23 33 89 0 72 246 74 0 94 28 14 0 944 530-545 31 310 5 0 31 26 77 0 45 229 105 0 100 27 10 0 996 545-600 12 227 20 0 22 35 99 0 57 238 74 0 105 22 11 1 923 HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-500 67 1044 54 0 91 109 323 0 250 916 274 0 316 64 55 1 3564 415-515 68 1082 54 0 98 108 325 0 262 946 300 0 326 68 54 2 3693 430-530 74 1072 53 0 99 112 331 0 266 970 312 0 342 78 48 1 3758 445-545 89 1088 46 0 108 108 331 0 249 956 347 0 380 92 47 1 3842 500-600 78 1077 49 0 110 113 352 0 239 956 346 0 385 97 47 2 3851

PEAK HOUR
110
113
575
352
78 1077 49 0
0 2
0 346 956 239
47 RIVERPARK BOULEVARD 531
97 385 VINEYARD AVENUE

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-415 30014 400-415 11013
415-430 10034 415-430 00000
430-445 10034 430-445 20013
445-500 00000 445-500 20013
500-515 10034 500-515 20002
515-530 00033 515-530 20002
530-545 10034 530-545 12003
545-600 10023 545-600 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-500 5 0 0 7 12 400-500 51039
415-515 3 0 0 9 12 415-515 60028
430-530 2 0 0 9 11 430-530 8 0 0 2 10
445-545 2 0 0 9 11 445-545 7 2 0 1 10
500-600 3 0 0 11 14 500-600 52007

APPROACH SUMMARIES

APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT
400-500 1165 1062 523 368 1440 1683 436 451
415-515 1204 1098 531 384 1508 1733 450 478
430-530 1199 1117 542 397 1548 1745 469 499
445-545 1223 1111 547 387 1552 1799 520 545
500-600 1204 1113 575 385 1541 1814 531 539

WEST APRCH
1204
500-600
1541

NORTH APRCH EAST APRCH SOUTH APRCH
691
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 9:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S VINEYARD AVENUE
E/W US 101 NB RAMPS
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-715 84 200 0 0 43 0 66 0 51 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 659
715-730 100 233 0 0 52 0 83 0 77 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 859
730-745 117 279 0 0 63 0 92 0 73 385 0 0 0 0 0 0 1009
745-800 123 331 0 0 44 0 79 0 80 378 0 0 0 0 0 0 1035
800-815 96 274 0 0 64 0 72 0 56 431 0 0 0 0 0 0 993
815-830 100 263 0 0 67 0 93 0 40 303 0 0 0 0 0 0 866
830-845 82 288 0 0 58 0 133 0 51 241 0 0 0 0 0 0 853
845-900 72 275 0 0 42 0 89 0 56 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 761
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-800 424 1043 0 0 202 0 320 0 281 1292 0 0 0 0 0 0 3562 715-815 436 1117 0 0 223 0 326 0 286 1508 0 0 0 0 0 0 3896 730-830 436 1147 0 0 238 0 336 0 249 1497 0 0 0 0 0 0 3903 745-845 401 1156 0 0 233 0 377 0 227 1353 0 0 0 0 0 0 3747 800-900 350 1100 0 0 231 0 387 0 203 1202 0 0 0 0 0 0 3473

PEAK HOUR
238
0 574
336
436 1147 0 0
0 0
0 0 1497 249
0 US 101 NB RAMPS 0
0 0 VINEYARD AVENUE

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-715 20002 700-715 11103
715-730 00101 715-730 01001
730-745 20002 730-745 20002
745-800 11103 745-800 00000
800-815 10001 800-815 10001
815-830 20002 815-830 10001
830-845 11103 830-845 10001
845-900 20002 845-900 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-800 51208 700-800 32106
715-815 41207 715-815 31004
730-830 61108 730-830 40004
745-845 52209 745-845 30003
800-900 61108 800-900 30003
1583
730-830
1746
692
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S VINEYARD AVENUE
E/W US 101 NB RAMPS
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-415 59 349 0 0 48 0 113 0 66 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 913
415-430 83 309 0 0 44 0 98 0 70 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 915
430-445 71 349 0 0 50 0 136 0 63 338 0 0 0 0 0 0 1007
445-500 80 381 0 0 55 0 106 0 54 339 0 0 0 0 0 0 1015
500-515 92 384 0 0 50 0 142 0 69 345 0 0 0 0 0 0 1082
515-530 73 351 0 0 59 0 120 0 92 342 0 0 0 0 0 0 1037
530-545 93 383 0 0 68 0 138 0 70 347 0 0 0 0 0 0 1099
545-600 82 319 0 0 60 0 129 0 57 341 0 0 0 0 0 0 988
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-500 293 1388 0 0 197 0 453 0 253 1266 0 0 0 0 0 0 3850 415-515 326 1423 0 0 199 0 482 0 256 1333 0 0 0 0 0 0 4019 430-530 316 1465 0 0 214 0 504 0 278 1364 0 0 0 0 0 0 4141 445-545 338 1499 0 0 232 0 506 0 285 1373 0 0 0 0 0 0 4233 500-600 340 1437 0 0 237 0 529 0 288 1375 0 0 0 0 0 0 4206

PEAK HOUR
232
0 738
506
338 1499 0 0
0 0
0 0 1373 285
0 US 101 NB RAMPS 0
0 0 VINEYARD AVENUE

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-415 10001 400-415 01102
415-430 10001 415-430 00000
430-445 20002 430-445 10001
445-500 10001 445-500 11103
500-515 30003 500-515 20002
515-530 20002 515-530 00000
530-545 30003 530-545 02204
545-600 20002 545-600 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-500 50005 400-500 22206
415-515 70007 415-515 41106
430-530 80008 430-530 41106
445-545 90009 445-545 33309
500-600 10 0 0 0 10 500-600 22206

APPROACH SUMMARIES

APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT
400-500 1681 1463 650 253 1519 1841 0 293
415-515 1749 1532 681 256 1589 1905 0 326
430-530 1781 1578 718 278 1642 1969 0 316
445-545 1837 1605 738 285 1658 2005 0 338
500-600 1777 1612 766 288 1663 1966 0 340

WEST APRCH
1837
445-545
1658

NORTH APRCH EAST APRCH SOUTH APRCH
693
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 9:00 AM
INTERSECTION: N/S VINEYARD AVENUE
E/W US 101 SB RAMPS
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-715 89 172 0 0 0 0 0 0 291 223 0 0 21 0 43 0 839
715-730 82 257 0 0 0 0 0 0 267 313 0 0 48 0 120 0 1087
730-745 88 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 242 384 0 0 33 0 95 0 1102
745-800 80 337 0 0 0 0 0 0 202 327 0 0 50 0 139 0 1135
800-815 52 263 0 0 0 0 0 0 254 354 0 0 72 0 103 0 1098
815-830 83 325 0 0 0 0 0 0 218 291 0 0 49 0 76 0 1042
830-845 66 348 0 0 0 0 0 0 226 243 0 0 43 0 65 0 991
845-900 72 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 172 200 0 0 37 0 60 0 851
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 700-800 339 1026 000000 1002 1247 0 0 152 0 397 0 4163
715-815 302 1117 0 0 0 0 0 0 965 1378 0 0 203 0 457 0 4422 730-830 303 1185 0 0 0 0 0 0 916 1356 0 0 204 0 413 0 4377 745-845 281 1273 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 1215 0 0 214 0 383 0 4266 800-900 273 1246 0 0 0 0 0 0 870 1088 0 0 201 0 304 0 3982

PEAK HOUR
0 0
0 0
302 1117 0 0
0 0
0 0 1378 965
457
US 101 SB RAMPS 660
0 203 VINEYARD AVENUE

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-715 00022 700-715 00011
715-730 00000 715-730 00000
730-745 00011 730-745 00011
745-800 00022 745-800 00000
800-815 00000 800-815 00011
815-830 00033 815-830 00011
830-845 00011 830-845 00011
845-900 00022 845-900 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
700-800 00055 700-800 00022
715-815 00033 715-815 00022
730-830 00066 730-830 00033
745-845 00066 745-845 00033
800-900 00066 800-900 00033
1419
715-815
2343
694
WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 [email protected]

INTERSECTION CAR/PED/BIKE TRAFFIC COUNT RESULTS SUMMARY CLIENT: GIBSON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTING, INC.

PROJECT: RIVERPARK TRAFFIC COUNTS
DATE: WEDNESDAY SEPTEMBER 18, 2019
PERIOD: 4:00 PM TO 6:00 PM
INTERSECTION: N/S VINEYARD AVENUE
E/W US 101 SB RAMPS
CITY: OXNARD

VEHICLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-415 59 439 0 0 0 0 0 0 176 274 0 0 35 0 86 0 1069
415-430 62 402 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 316 0 0 42 0 92 0 1081
430-445 45 420 0 0 0 0 0 0 179 295 0 0 28 0 100 0 1067
445-500 56 451 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 294 0 0 32 0 106 0 1102
500-515 47 484 0 0 0 0 0 0 204 333 0 0 42 0 94 0 1204
515-530 46 421 0 0 0 0 0 0 204 385 0 0 48 0 79 0 1183
530-545 57 450 0 0 0 0 0 0 191 364 0 0 34 0 89 0 1185
545-600 48 443 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 318 0 0 34 0 92 0 1102
HOUR TOTALS 1 2 3 3U 4 5 6 6U 7 8 9 9U 10 11 12 12U

PERIOD SBRT SBTH SBLT SBUT WBRT WBTH WBLT WBUT NBRT NBTH NBLT NBUT EBRT EBTH EBLT EBUT TOTAL 400-500 222 1712 0 0 0 0 0 0 685 1179 0 0 137 0 384 0 4319 415-515 210 1757 0 0 0 0 0 0 713 1238 0 0 144 0 392 0 4454 430-530 194 1776 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 1307 0 0 150 0 379 0 4556 445-545 206 1806 0 0 0 0 0 0 762 1376 0 0 156 0 368 0 4674 500-600 198 1798 0 0 0 0 0 0 766 1400 0 0 158 0 354 0 4674

PEAK HOUR
0 0
0 0
206 1806 0 0
0 0
0 0 1376 762
368
US 101 SB RAMPS 524
0 156 VINEYARD AVENUE

PEDESTRIAN COUNTS BICYCLE COUNTS
15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL 15 MIN COUNTS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-415 00033 400-415 00011
415-430 00011 415-430 00000
430-445 00022 430-445 00000
445-500 00000 445-500 00011
500-515 00022 500-515 00011
515-530 00011 515-530 00000
530-545 00022 530-545 00000
545-600 00022 545-600 00000

HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL HOUR TOTALS NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST TOTAL

PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG PERIOD LEG LEG LEG LEG
400-500 00066 400-500 00022
415-515 00055 415-515 00022
430-530 00055 430-530 00022
445-545 00055 445-545 00022
500-600 00077 500-600 00011

APPROACH SUMMARIES

APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT APRCH EXIT
400-500 1934 1563 0 685 1864 1849 521 222
415-515 1967 1630 0 713 1951 1901 536 210
430-530 1970 1686 0 750 2057 1926 529 194
445-545 2012 1744 0 762 2138 1962 524 206
500-600 1996 1754 0 766 2166 1956 512 198

WEST APRCH
2012
445-545
2138

NORTH APRCH EAST APRCH SOUTH APRCH
695
Attachment B
Level of Service Worksheets
696
2019_AM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:33 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report
Scenario: 2019_AM
Command: 2019_AM
Volume: 2019_AM
Geometry: Default Geometry
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation
Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution
Paths: Default Path
Routes: Default Route
Configuration: Default Configuration
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 697
2019_AM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:33 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 8 VENTURA RD / TOWN CENTER DR A xxxxx 0.513 A xxxxx 0.513 + 0.000 V/C # 9 OXNARD BLVD / TOWN CENTER DR B xxxxx 0.660 B xxxxx 0.660 + 0.000 V/C # 10 VINEYARD AVE (SR-232) / RIVER C 26.2 0.640 C 26.2 0.640 + 0.000 D/V # 11 OXNARD BLVD / US-101 NB RAMPS C 23.9 0.517 C 23.9 0.517 + 0.000 D/V # 12 OXNARD BLVD / US 101 SB RAMPS C 21.4 0.369 C 21.4 0.369 + 0.000 D/V # 13 VINEYARD AVE / US-101 NB RAMPS B 13.4 0.474 B 13.4 0.474 + 0.000 D/V # 14 VINEYARD AVE / US-101 SB RAMPS B 17.2 0.682 B 17.2 0.682 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 698
2019_AM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:33 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 VENTURA RD / TOWN CENTER DR
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.513
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 2 0 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 44 516 907 268 283 5 1 5 2 255 64 87
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 44 516 907 268 283 5 1 5 2 255 64 87
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 44 516 0 268 283 5 1 5 2 255 64 87
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 44 516 0 268 283 5 1 5 2 255 64 87
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 44 516 0 268 283 5 1 5 2 255 64 87
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 0.12 0.63 0.25 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3144 56 200 1000 400 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.16 0.00 0.17 0.09 0.09 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.04 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 699
2019_AM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:33 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 OXNARD BLVD / TOWN CENTER DR
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.660
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 45 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Ovl
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 321 292 296 13 648 39 44 135 995 150 74 11
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 321 292 296 13 648 39 44 135 995 150 74 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 321 292 296 13 648 39 44 135 995 150 74 11
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 321 292 296 13 648 39 44 135 995 150 74 11 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 321 292 296 13 648 39 44 135 995 150 74 11 OvlAdjVol: 221 674 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 3200 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.09 0.19 0.01 0.20 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.31 0.05 0.05 0.01 OvlAdjV/S: 0.14 0.21 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 700
2019_AM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:33 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 VINEYARD AVE (SR-232) / RIVER PARK BLVD ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.640
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.2
Optimal Cycle: 61 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 159 1032 468 105 1004 56 46 130 340 243 57 46 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 159 1032 468 105 1004 56 46 130 340 243 57 46 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 159 1032 468 105 1004 56 46 130 340 243 57 46 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 159 1032 468 105 1004 56 46 130 340 243 57 46 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 159 1032 468 105 1004 56 46 130 340 243 57 46 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.87 0.87 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.75 0.96 0.96 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.06 0.94 1.00 2.84 0.16 0.26 0.74 2.00 1.62 0.38 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 3401 1542 1805 4874 272 490 1385 2842 2958 694 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.03 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.47 0.47 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.13 0.13 0.13 Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.44 0.44 0.64 0.64 0.48 0.64 0.64 0.22 Uniform Del: 42.2 19.9 19.9 43.9 18.2 18.2 40.2 40.2 32.1 41.4 41.4 39.1 IncremntDel: 0.9 0.6 0.6 8.2 0.1 0.1 5.0 5.0 0.5 3.0 3.0 0.5 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 43.1 20.5 20.5 52.1 18.3 18.3 45.2 45.2 32.6 44.4 44.4 39.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 43.1 20.5 20.5 52.1 18.3 18.3 45.2 45.2 32.6 44.4 44.4 39.6 LOS by Move: D C C D B B D D C D D D
HCM2k95thQ: 6 24 24 8 15 15 12 12 11 11 11 3
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 701
2019_AM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:33 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 OXNARD BLVD / US-101 NB RAMPS
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.517
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 23.9
Optimal Cycle: 42 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 851 526 0 0 557 1255 0 0 0 125 0 385
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 851 526 0 0 557 1255 0 0 0 125 0 385
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 851 526 0 0 557 0 0 0 0 125 0 385
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 851 526 0 0 557 0 0 0 0 125 0 385
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 851 526 0 0 557 0 0 0 0 125 0 385
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 0.00 1.75 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 0 0 6916 1900 0 0 0 2073 0 2922
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.13 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.47 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.52 Uniform Del: 18.6 8.2 0.0 0.0 38.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.6 0.0 32.0 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 18.9 8.3 0.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.6 0.0 32.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 18.9 8.3 0.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.6 0.0 32.5 LOS by Move: B A A A D A A A A C A C
HCM2k95thQ: 18 7 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 5 0 12
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 702
2019_AM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:33 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 OXNARD BLVD / US 101 SB RAMPS
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.369
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.4
Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Ignore Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 1068 111 311 358 0 286 0 838 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1068 111 311 358 0 286 0 838 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1068 0 311 358 0 286 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1068 0 311 358 0 286 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1068 0 311 358 0 286 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 6916 1900 3502 3610 0 3502 0 1900 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.09 0.10 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.24 0.66 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.15 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 20.0 0.0 31.7 6.5 0.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 20.1 0.0 31.9 6.5 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 20.1 0.0 31.9 6.5 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C A C A A C A A A A A
HCM2k95thQ: 0 12 0 8 4 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 703
2019_AM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:33 Page 8-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 VINEYARD AVE / US-101 NB RAMPS
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.474
Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.4
Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 1497 249 0 1147 436 0 0 0 336 0 238
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1497 249 0 1147 436 0 0 0 336 0 238
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1497 0 0 1147 0 0 0 0 336 0 238
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1497 0 0 1147 0 0 0 0 336 0 238
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1497 0 0 1147 0 0 0 0 336 0 238
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 0 0 0 3502 0 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.15 Crit Moves: **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.31 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.47 Uniform Del: 0.0 10.7 0.0 0.0 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 27.8 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.7 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 28.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 9.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 28.5 LOS by Move: A B A A A A A A A C A C
HCM2k95thQ: 0 17 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 8 0 12
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 704
2019_AM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:33 Page 9-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 VINEYARD AVE / US-101 SB RAMPS
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.682
Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.2
Optimal Cycle: 46 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 1378 965 0 1117 302 457 0 203 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1378 965 0 1117 302 457 0 203 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1378 0 0 1117 0 457 0 203 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1378 0 0 1117 0 457 0 203 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1378 0 0 1117 0 457 0 203 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.53 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1900 0 5187 1900 2681 0 825 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 15.7 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 24.6 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 24.9 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 24.9 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B A A B A C A C A A A
HCM2k95thQ: 0 29 0 0 13 0 14 0 22 0 0 0
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 705
2019_PM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:37 Page 1-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report
Scenario: 2019_PM
Command: 2019_PM
Volume: 2019_PM
Geometry: Default Geometry
Impact Fee: Default Impact Fee
Trip Generation: Default Trip Generation
Trip Distribution: Default Trip Distribution
Paths: Default Path
Routes: Default Route
Configuration: Default Configuration
Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 706
2019_PM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:37 Page 2-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Impact Analysis Report
Level Of Service
Intersection Base Future Change
Del/ V/ Del/ V/ in
LOS Veh C LOS Veh C
# 8 VENTURA RD / TOWN CENTER DR A xxxxx 0.525 A xxxxx 0.525 + 0.000 V/C # 9 OXNARD BLVD / TOWN CENTER DR A xxxxx 0.563 A xxxxx 0.563 + 0.000 V/C # 10 VINEYARD AVE (SR-232) / RIVER C 29.0 0.630 C 29.0 0.630 + 0.000 D/V # 11 OXNARD BLVD / US-101 NB RAMPS C 26.0 0.597 C 26.0 0.597 + 0.000 D/V # 12 OXNARD BLVD / US 101 SB RAMPS C 22.4 0.442 C 22.4 0.442 + 0.000 D/V # 13 VINEYARD AVE / US-101 NB RAMPS B 14.1 0.471 B 14.1 0.471 + 0.000 D/V # 14 VINEYARD AVE / US-101 SB RAMPS B 14.7 0.625 B 14.7 0.625 + 0.000 D/V Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 707
2019_PM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:37 Page 3-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 VENTURA RD / TOWN CENTER DR
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.525
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 35 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 2 0 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 7 423 630 155 336 2 4 52 5 506 13 29
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 7 423 630 155 336 2 4 52 5 506 13 29
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 7 423 0 155 336 2 4 52 5 506 13 29
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 7 423 0 155 336 2 4 52 5 506 13 29
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 7 423 0 155 336 2 4 52 5 506 13 29
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 0.07 0.85 0.08 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3181 19 105 1364 131 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.16 0.01 0.02 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 708
2019_PM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:38 Page 4-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 OXNARD BLVD / TOWN CENTER DR
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.563
Loss Time (sec): 10 Average Delay (sec/veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Ovl
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 334 648 506 15 446 58 84 174 589 445 142 22
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 334 648 506 15 446 58 84 174 589 445 142 22 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 334 648 506 15 446 58 84 174 589 445 142 22 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 334 648 506 15 446 58 84 174 589 445 142 22 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 334 648 506 15 446 58 84 174 589 445 142 22 OvlAdjVol: 283 255 7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 3200 3200 1600 1600 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.20 0.32 0.01 0.14 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.18 0.14 0.09 0.01 OvlAdjV/S: 0.18 0.08 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 709
2019_PM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:38 Page 5-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 VINEYARD AVE (SR-232) / RIVER PARK BLVD ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.630
Loss Time (sec): 16 Average Delay (sec/veh): 29.0
Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Ovl Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 346 956 239 49 1077 78 49 97 385 352 113 110
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 346 956 239 49 1077 78 49 97 385 352 113 110 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 346 956 239 49 1077 78 49 97 385 352 113 110 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 346 956 239 49 1077 78 49 97 385 352 113 110 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 346 956 239 49 1077 78 49 97 385 352 113 110 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.88 0.88 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.98 0.98 0.75 0.96 0.96 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.40 0.60 1.00 2.80 0.20 0.34 0.66 2.00 1.51 0.49 1.00 Final Sat.: 3502 4025 1006 1805 4788 347 627 1241 2842 2773 890 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.08 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.46 0.46 0.05 0.36 0.36 0.12 0.12 0.28 0.20 0.20 0.20 Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.48 0.63 0.63 0.34 Uniform Del: 39.4 19.0 19.0 46.1 26.6 26.6 41.6 41.6 29.9 36.5 36.5 34.2 IncremntDel: 2.3 0.2 0.2 4.8 0.7 0.7 5.5 5.5 0.5 1.8 1.8 0.6 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 41.8 19.2 19.2 50.9 27.4 27.4 47.1 47.1 30.3 38.3 38.3 34.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.8 19.2 19.2 50.9 27.4 27.4 47.1 47.1 30.3 38.3 38.3 34.8 LOS by Move: D B B D C C D D C D D C
DesignQueue: 9 14 14 3 16 16 7 7 9 11 11 5
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 710
2019_PM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:38 Page 6-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 OXNARD BLVD / US-101 NB RAMPS
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.597
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.0
Optimal Cycle: 48 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Protected Permitted Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 758 912 0 0 637 839 0 0 0 209 0 631
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 758 912 0 0 637 839 0 0 0 209 0 631
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 758 912 0 0 637 0 0 0 0 209 0 631
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 758 912 0 0 637 0 0 0 0 209 0 631
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 758 912 0 0 637 0 0 0 0 209 0 631
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.25 0.00 1.75 Final Sat.: 3502 3610 0 0 6916 1900 0 0 0 2079 0 2916
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.36 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.60 Uniform Del: 25.9 15.6 0.0 0.0 39.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 0.0 25.9 IncremntDel: 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.7 15.8 0.0 0.0 40.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 0.0 26.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.7 15.8 0.0 0.0 40.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 0.0 26.6 LOS by Move: C B A A D A A A A C A C
DesignQueue: 15 14 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 6 0 13
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 711
2019_PM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:38 Page 7-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 OXNARD BLVD / US 101 SB RAMPS
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.442
Loss Time (sec): 12 Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.4
Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: C
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Ignore Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 1209 147 320 547 0 429 0 1073 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1209 147 320 547 0 429 0 1073 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1209 0 320 547 0 429 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1209 0 320 547 0 429 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1209 0 320 547 0 429 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 6916 1900 3502 3610 0 3502 0 1900 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.09 0.15 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.21 0.60 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.44 0.25 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 22.1 0.0 34.6 9.3 0.0 29.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 22.2 0.0 35.0 9.4 0.0 30.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 22.2 0.0 35.0 9.4 0.0 30.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C A D A A C A A A A A
DesignQueue: 0 12 0 7 7 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 712
2019_PM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:38 Page 8-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 VINEYARD AVE / US-101 NB RAMPS
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.471
Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.1
Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 1373 285 0 1499 338 0 0 0 506 0 232
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1373 285 0 1499 338 0 0 0 506 0 232
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1373 0 0 1499 0 0 0 0 506 0 232
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1373 0 0 1499 0 0 0 0 506 0 232
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1373 0 0 1499 0 0 0 0 506 0 232
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 0 0 0 3502 0 1615
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.14 Crit Moves: **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.31 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.47 Uniform Del: 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 10.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.1 0.0 28.1 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.7 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 28.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.4 0.0 28.8 LOS by Move: A B A A B A A A A C A C
DesignQueue: 0 12 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 10 0 9
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 713
2019_PM Wed Oct 30, 2019 13:06:38 Page 9-1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 VINEYARD AVE / US-101 SB RAMPS
******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.625
Loss Time (sec): 8 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.7
Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B
******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Control: Permitted Permitted Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Ignore Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module:

Base Vol: 0 1376 762 0 1806 206 368 0 156 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1376 762 0 1806 206 368 0 156 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1376 0 0 1806 0 368 0 156 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1376 0 0 1806 0 368 0 156 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1376 0 0 1806 0 368 0 156 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module:

Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.54 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1900 0 5187 1900 2701 0 804 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module:

Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** ****
Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.0 11.7 0.0 27.5 0.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 27.8 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 27.8 0.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B A A B A C A C A A A
DesignQueue: 0 17 0 0 16 0 9 0 14 0 0 0
******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to GIBSON TRANSPORTATION 714

DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO COMPARATIVE SUMMARY
TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES - OXNARD RIVERPARK SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 2021

TRIP GENERATION RATES
In Out Total In Out Total
ITE (Apartment) 3 Apartment 6.72 20% 80% 0.51 65% 35% 0.62 ITE (Shopping Center) 9 Regional Commercial 30.00 61% 39% 0.72 48% 52% 2.61

TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES
In Out Total In Out Total
Scenario 1 - Districts B, C, & D
3 Apartment 1,025 du 6,888 105 418 523 413 223 636
9 Regional Commercial -562.247 ksf -16,867 -247 -158 -704 -763 -1,467 -9,979 -142 260
-405
118 -291 -540 -831
Scenario 2 - Districts B & C
3 Apartment 613 du 4,119 63 250 313 247 133 380
9 Regional Commercial -336.377 ksf -10,091 -148 -94 -242 -421 -457 -878 -5,972 -85 156 71 -174 -324 -498
Scenario 3 - Districts C & D
3 Apartment 692 du 4,650 71 282 353 278 151 429
9 Regional Commercial -379.727 ksf -11,392 -167 -106 -273 -475 -516 -991 -6,742 -96 176 80 -197 -365 -562
Scenario 4 - Districts B & D
3 Apartment 745 du 5,006 76 304 380 300 162 462
9 Regional Commercial -408.810 ksf -12,264 -179 -115 -294 -512 -555 -1,067 -7,258 -103 189 86 -212 -393 -605
Scenario 5 - District B
3 Apartment 333 du 2,238 34 136 170 133 73 2069 Regional Commercial -182.730 ksf -5,482 -81 -51 -132 -228 -249 -477 -3,244 -47 85 38 -95 -176 -271
Scenario 6 - District C
3 Apartment 280 du 1,882 29 114 143 113 61 1749 Regional Commercial -153.647 ksf -4,609 -68 -43 -111 -192 -209 -401 -2,727 -39 71 32 -79 -148 -227
Scenario 7 - Districts D
3 Apartment 412 du 2,769 42 168 210 165 90 2559 Regional Commercial -266.080 ksf -7,982 -117 -75 -192 -333 -361 -694 -5,213 -75 93 18 -168 -271 -439
Development Scenarios Daily
Morning Peak Hour Afternoon Peak Hour Land Use
No. Land Use Description Size
ksf
Afternoon Peak Hour
du
Source (Oxnard Traffic Model) Land Use No. Land Use Description Rate Daily Morning Peak Hour 715

APPENDIX B
Air Emissions Calculations
716
Adopted Specific Plan
717

0.004

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2030
Utility Company Southern California Edison
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Regional Shopping Center 1,574.00 1000sqft 36.13 1,574,000.00 3372
Single Family Housing 823.00 Dwelling Unit 248.31 1,481,400.00 2518 Condo/Townhouse 1,102.00 Dwelling Unit 68.88 1,102,000.00 0 Apartments Low Rise 880.00 Dwelling Unit 55.00 880,000.00 2693 Hotel 320.00 Room 10.67 464,640.00
0 City Park 43.50 Acre 43.50 1,894,860.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 226.00 Acre 226.00 9,844,560.00 0 General Light Industry 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Elementary School 1,683.00 Student 3.23 140,704.47
0 Government Office Building 19.00 1000sqft 0.44 19,000.00 0 General Office Building 421.00 1000sqft 9.66 421,000.00 RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan
Ventura County, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 718
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 880.00 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 1,102.00 0.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 880.00 110.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 480.00 60.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 12,400.00 1,550.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1,240.00 155.00
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 880.00 110.00
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 100 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 75 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100 50
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 75.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 50.00 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumed VCAPCD Rule 55 dust control measures.

Area Mitigation - Consistent with VCAPCD Rule 74.2 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings.

Water Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Grading -
Architectural Coating - Consistent with VCAPCD Rule 74.2 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings.

Vehicle Trips - Based on Traffic Study
Woodstoves - No woodstoves, no fireplace
Area Coating - Consistent with VCAPCD Rule 74.2 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings.

Land Use - Based on Traffic Study Adopted Specific Plan land uses. Specific Plan area is 702 acres.

Construction Phase - Estimated construction assumption. 719
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 37.75 30.86
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.44 9.57
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 22.59 30.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 8.17
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.96 6.50
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.74 13.50
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 7.32 8.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.89 1.29
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 7.32 6.72
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 2.28
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 21.10 17.25
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.55 8.67
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 0.97
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 5.81
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.28 6.86
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.00 6.55
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.28 5.77
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 6.40
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 46.12 37.70
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.54 9.67
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 3.06
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 8.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.14 8.90
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.99 2.61
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.14 7.47
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 5.73
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 823.00 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 267.21 248.31
720
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.3932 9.3988 113,022.176
2 Mitigated Construction

1.5400 23.1749 0.0000 110,111.51
82 110,111.51
82 Maximum 335.7484 128.4150 245.9882 1.0483 80.0416 1.6358 81.6703 21.6368 97,682.557
2 97,682.557
2 4.0805 8.1301 100,207.348
3 4.1017 8.3197 102,093.954
1 2029 335.7484 114.3678 188.2255 0.9042 80.0416 1.3509 81.3925 21.6368 1.2752 22.9119 0.0000

1.2962 22.9327 0.0000 99,512.138
0 99,512.138
0 2028 19.5744 116.1131 194.5752 0.9248 80.0408 1.3735 81.4143 21.6365 101,464.48
36 101,464.48
36 4.1333 8.5191 104,106.509
7 4.1787 8.7352 106,313.673
5 2027 20.6008 117.9126 201.7736 0.9471 80.0400 1.3952 81.4352 21.6362 1.3163 22.9525 0.0000

1.3362 22.9721 0.0000 103,606.11
09 103,606.11
09 2026 21.7126 120.1060 210.4778 0.9714 80.0392 1.4166 81.4558 21.6359 105,785.18
79 105,785.18
79 4.2315 8.9511 108,558.410
8 4.3036 9.1816 110,902.150
8 2025 22.9105 122.3277 220.5586 0.9966 80.0382 1.4344 81.4727 21.6356 1.3527 22.9883 0.0000

1.4467 23.0820 0.0000 108,058.44
91 108,058.44
91 2024 24.3560 125.6197 232.5838 1.0239 80.0373 1.5347 81.5720 21.6353 110,111.51
82 110,111.51
82 4.3932 9.3988 113,022.176
2 1.9489 4.0400e0036,208.6698
2023 25.9473 128.4150 245.9882 1.0483 80.0364 1.6339 81.6703 21.6349 1.5400 23.1749 0.0000 2022 3.6867 38.8834 29.5975 0.0635 19.8049 1.6358 21.4183 10.1417 1.5050 11.6260 0.0000 6,158.7443 6,158.7443 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
721
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.07 0.00 2.03 3.81 0.00 3.57 0.00

4.3932 9.3988 113,022.176
2 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2

1.5400 23.1749 0.0000 110,111.51
82 110,111.51
82 Maximum 335.7484 128.4150 245.9882 1.0483 80.0416 1.6358 81.6703 21.6368 97,682.557
2 97,682.557
2 4.0805 8.1301 100,207.348
3 4.1017 8.3197 102,093.954
1 2029 335.7484 114.3678 188.2255 0.9042 80.0416 1.3509 81.3925 21.6368 1.2752 22.9119 0.0000

1.2962 22.9327 0.0000 99,512.138
0 99,512.138
0 2028 19.5744 116.1131 194.5752 0.9248 80.0408 1.3735 81.4143 21.6365 101,464.48
36 101,464.48
36 4.1333 8.5191 104,106.509
7 4.1787 8.7352 106,313.673
5 2027 20.6008 117.9126 201.7736 0.9471 80.0400 1.3952 81.4352 21.6362 1.3163 22.9525 0.0000

1.3362 22.9721 0.0000 103,606.11
09 103,606.11
09 2026 21.7126 120.1060 210.4778 0.9714 80.0392 1.4166 81.4558 21.6359 105,785.18
79 105,785.18
79 4.2315 8.9511 108,558.410
8 4.3036 9.1816 110,902.150
8 2025 22.9105 122.3277 220.5586 0.9966 80.0382 1.4344 81.4727 21.6356 1.3527 22.9883 0.0000

1.4467 23.0820 0.0000 108,058.44
91 108,058.44
91 2024 24.3560 125.6197 232.5838 1.0239 80.0373 1.5347 81.5720 21.6353 110,111.51
82 110,111.51
82 4.3932 9.3988 113,022.176
2 1.9489 4.0400e0036,208.6698
2023 25.9473 128.4150 245.9882 1.0483 80.0364 1.6339 81.6703 21.6349 1.5400 23.1749 0.0000 2022 3.6867 38.8834 29.5975 0.0635 7.8141 1.6358 9.4275 3.9792 1.5050 5.4635 0.0000 6,158.7443 6,158.7443 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
722
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00
N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 2.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM2.5
Total
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2
374,424.65
66 374,424.65
66 23.7013 16.0122 379,788.816
2 22.8479 15.5779 355,532.304
3 Total 337.2248 190.6850 1,798.7665 3.3854 413.7438 5.0807 418.8246 110.2731 4.9265 115.1996 0.0000

2.1413 112.4144 350,318.89
70 350,318.89
70 Mobile 193.9048 169.0665 1,556.7098 3.2547 413.7438 2.2956 416.0394 110.2731 23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147
Energy 2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 Area 141.1486 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
374,424.65
66 374,424.65
66 23.7013 16.0122 379,788.816
2 22.8479 15.5779 355,532.304
3 Total 346.9700 190.6850 1,798.7665 3.3854 413.7438 5.0807 418.8246 110.2731 4.9265 115.1996 0.0000

2.1413 112.4144 350,318.89
70 350,318.89
70 Mobile 193.9048 169.0665 1,556.7098 3.2547 413.7438 2.2956 416.0394 110.2731 23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147
Energy 2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 Area 150.8938 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 Category lb/day lb/day
723
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84

0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231

0.48 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367

0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187

0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97
Load Factor
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 90
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 465
Acres of Paving: 226
Residential Indoor: 7,013,385; Residential Outdoor: 2,337,795; Non-Residential Indoor: 3,941,017; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,313,672; Striped

OffRoad Equipment
5 110
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/31/2029 12/31/2029 5 110 4 Paving Paving 2/27/2029 7/30/2029
5 155
3 Building Construction Building Construction 3/21/2023 2/26/2029 5 1550 2 Grading Grading 8/16/2022 3/20/2023
Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/24/2022 8/15/2022 5 60 Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
724
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 1,511.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 7,556.00 2,655.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

0.48 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78

0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132

0.45 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46
725
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 7.6662 0.0000 7.6662 3.9400 0.0000 3.9400 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
132.6004 132.6004 4.1900e0033.6400e003133.7886

4.1900e0033.6400e003133.7886
Total 0.0557 0.0360 0.5004 1.3000e0030.1479 8.5000e0040.1487 0.0392 7.8000e0040.0400

7.8000e0041.3000e- 0.0400 132.6004 132.6004
003

0.1479 8.5000e004Worker 0.0557 0.0360 0.5004 0.1487 0.0392

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.1922 3,715.8655
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 726
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.3 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
132.6004 132.6004 4.1900e0033.6400e003133.7886

4.1900e0033.6400e003133.7886
Total 0.0557 0.0360 0.5004 1.3000e0030.1479 8.5000e0040.1487 0.0392 7.8000e0040.0400

7.8000e0041.3000e- 0.0400 132.6004 132.6004
003

0.1479 8.5000e004Worker 0.0557 0.0360 0.5004 0.1487 0.0392

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.1922 3,715.8655
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 7.6662 1.6126 9.2788 3.9400 1.4836 5.4235 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 727
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 3.5894 0.0000 3.5894 1.4250 0.0000 1.4250 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
147.3338 147.3338 4.6500e0034.0400e003148.6540

4.6500e0034.0400e003148.6540
Total 0.0619 0.0400 0.5560 1.4500e0030.1643 9.4000e0040.1652 0.0436 8.7000e0040.0445

8.7000e0041.4500e- 0.0445 147.3338 147.3338
003

0.1643 9.4000e004Worker 0.0619 0.0400 0.5560 0.1652 0.0436

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.9442 6,060.0158
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 9.2036 1.6349 10.8385 3.6538 1.5041 5.1579 6,011.4105 6,011.4105 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.4105 6,011.4105 1.9442 6,060.0158 728
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.3 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
147.3338 147.3338 4.6500e0034.0400e003148.6540

4.6500e0034.0400e003148.6540
Total 0.0619 0.0400 0.5560 1.4500e0030.1643 9.4000e0040.1652 0.0436 8.7000e0040.0445

8.7000e0041.4500e- 0.0445 147.3338 147.3338
003

0.1643 9.4000e004Worker 0.0619 0.0400 0.5560 0.1652 0.0436

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.9442 6,060.0158
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 3.5894 1.6349 5.2243 1.4250 1.5041 2.9291 0.0000 6,011.4105 6,011.4105 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.4105 6,011.4105 1.9442 6,060.0158 729
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 3.5894 0.0000 3.5894 1.4250 0.0000 1.4250 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
143.4697 143.4697 4.2100e0033.7500e003144.6916

4.2100e0033.7500e003144.6916
Total 0.0575 0.0356 0.5135 1.4000e0030.1643 8.9000e0040.1652 0.0436 8.2000e0040.0444

8.2000e0041.4000e- 0.0444 143.4697 143.4697
003

0.1643 8.9000e004Worker 0.0575 0.0356 0.5135 0.1652 0.0436

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.9442 6,060.0836
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.4777 6,011.4777 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.4777 6,011.4777 1.9442 6,060.0836 730
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
143.4697 143.4697 4.2100e0033.7500e003144.6916

4.2100e0033.7500e003144.6916
Total 0.0575 0.0356 0.5135 1.4000e0030.1643 8.9000e0040.1652 0.0436 8.2000e0040.0444

8.2000e0041.4000e- 0.0444 143.4697 143.4697
003

0.1643 8.9000e004Worker 0.0575 0.0356 0.5135 0.1652 0.0436

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.9442 6,060.0836
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 3.5894 1.4245 5.0139 1.4250 1.3105 2.7355 0.0000 6,011.4777 6,011.4777 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.4777 6,011.4777 1.9442 6,060.0836 731
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061

0.6079 2,570.4061
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
107,556.30
83 107,556.30
83 3.7853 9.3988 110,451.770
1 1.5904 1.4157 54,664.4792
Total 24.3745 114.0301 229.7442 1.0214 80.0364 0.9342 80.9706 21.6349 0.8816 22.5165

0.3097 16.7738 54,202.852
9 54,202.852
9 Worker 21.7400 13.4381 194.0060 0.5296 62.0708 0.3363 62.4071 16.4641 53,353.455
5 53,353.455
5 2.1950 7.9831 55,787.2909

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.6346 100.5920 35.7381 0.4918 17.9656 0.5979 18.5635 5.1708 0.5719 5.7427 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 732
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 0.6044 2,570.8077

0.6044 2,570.8077
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
107,556.30
83 107,556.30
83 3.7853 9.3988 110,451.770
1 1.5904 1.4157 54,664.4792
Total 24.3745 114.0301 229.7442 1.0214 80.0364 0.9342 80.9706 21.6349 0.8816 22.5165

0.3097 16.7738 54,202.852
9 54,202.852
9 Worker 21.7400 13.4381 194.0060 0.5296 62.0708 0.3363 62.4071 16.4641 53,353.455
5 53,353.455
5 2.1950 7.9831 55,787.2909

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.6346 100.5920 35.7381 0.4918 17.9656 0.5979 18.5635 5.1708 0.5719 5.7427 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
733
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 0.6044 2,570.8077

0.6044 2,570.8077
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
105,502.75
02 105,502.75
02 3.6992 9.1816 108,331.343
2 1.4482 1.3208 53,384.7728
Total 22.8844 112.1759 216.4170 0.9969 80.0373 0.9214 80.9587 21.6353 0.8698 22.5051

0.2964 16.7604 52,954.960
6 52,954.960
6 Worker 20.3138 12.0613 180.8557 0.5133 62.0708 0.3219 62.3926 16.4641 52,547.789
5 52,547.789
5 2.2510 7.8608 54,946.5704

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.5706 100.1146 35.5613 0.4836 17.9666 0.5995 18.5661 5.1712 0.5735 5.7447 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
734
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
105,502.75
02 105,502.75
02 3.6992 9.1816 108,331.343
2 1.4482 1.3208 53,384.7728
Total 22.8844 112.1759 216.4170 0.9969 80.0373 0.9214 80.9587 21.6353 0.8698 22.5051

0.2964 16.7604 52,954.960
6 52,954.960
6 Worker 20.3138 12.0613 180.8557 0.5133 62.0708 0.3219 62.3926 16.4641 52,547.789
5 52,547.789
5 2.2510 7.8608 54,946.5704

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.5706 100.1146 35.5613 0.4836 17.9666 0.5995 18.5661 5.1712 0.5735 5.7447 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
735
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
103,228.71
35 103,228.71
35 3.6305 8.9511 105,986.912
7 1.3159 1.2370 52,042.4020
Total 21.5431 109.8580 204.4739 0.9697 80.0382 0.9069 80.9451 21.6356 0.8565 22.4920

0.2827 16.7468 51,640.887
5 51,640.887
5 Worker 19.0299 10.8847 169.0450 0.4957 62.0708 0.3071 62.3778 16.4641 51,587.826
0 51,587.826
0 2.3147 7.7142 53,944.5107

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.5132 98.9733 35.4290 0.4740 17.9675 0.5998 18.5673 5.1715 0.5738 5.7453 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
736
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
103,228.71
35 103,228.71
35 3.6305 8.9511 105,986.912
7 1.3159 1.2370 52,042.4020
Total 21.5431 109.8580 204.4739 0.9697 80.0382 0.9069 80.9451 21.6356 0.8565 22.4920

0.2827 16.7468 51,640.887
5 51,640.887
5 Worker 19.0299 10.8847 169.0450 0.4957 62.0708 0.3071 62.3778 16.4641 51,587.826
0 51,587.826
0 2.3147 7.7142 53,944.5107

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.5132 98.9733 35.4290 0.4740 17.9675 0.5998 18.5673 5.1715 0.5738 5.7453 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
737
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
101,049.63
66 101,049.63
66 3.5778 8.7352 103,742.175
4 1.2008 1.1670 50,796.5592
Total 20.3452 107.6363 194.3931 0.9444 80.0392 0.8891 80.9283 21.6359 0.8400 22.4759

0.2686 16.7326 50,418.768
8 50,418.768
8 Worker 17.8837 9.9059 159.0109 0.4800 62.0708 0.2918 62.3625 16.4641 50,630.867
7 50,630.867
7 2.3769 7.5682 52,945.6163

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4616 97.7305 35.3822 0.4644 17.9684 0.5973 18.5657 5.1719 0.5714 5.7432 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
738
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
101,049.63
66 101,049.63
66 3.5778 8.7352 103,742.175
4 1.2008 1.1670 50,796.5592
Total 20.3452 107.6363 194.3931 0.9444 80.0392 0.8891 80.9283 21.6359 0.8400 22.4759

0.2686 16.7326 50,418.768
8 50,418.768
8 Worker 17.8837 9.9059 159.0109 0.4800 62.0708 0.2918 62.3625 16.4641 50,630.867
7 50,630.867
7 2.3769 7.5682 52,945.6163

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4616 97.7305 35.3822 0.4644 17.9684 0.5973 18.5657 5.1719 0.5714 5.7432 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
739
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
98,908.009
3 98,908.009
3 3.5323 8.5191 101,535.011
6 1.1001 1.1075 49,672.5424
Total 19.2334 105.4429 185.6890 0.9201 80.0400 0.8676 80.9076 21.6362 0.8200 22.4562

0.2526 16.7167 49,315.016
6 49,315.016
6 Worker 16.8151 9.0669 150.3431 0.4659 62.0708 0.2745 62.3452 16.4641 49,592.992
7 49,592.992
7 2.4323 7.4116 51,862.4692

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4183 96.3760 35.3459 0.4542 17.9693 0.5931 18.5624 5.1722 0.5674 5.7395 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
740
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
98,908.009
3 98,908.009
3 3.5323 8.5191 101,535.011
6 1.1001 1.1075 49,672.5424
Total 19.2334 105.4429 185.6890 0.9201 80.0400 0.8676 80.9076 21.6362 0.8200 22.4562

0.2526 16.7167 49,315.016
6 49,315.016
6 Worker 16.8151 9.0669 150.3431 0.4659 62.0708 0.2745 62.3452 16.4641 49,592.992
7 49,592.992
7 2.4323 7.4116 51,862.4692

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4183 96.3760 35.3459 0.4542 17.9693 0.5931 18.5624 5.1722 0.5674 5.7395 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
741
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
96,955.663
6 96,955.663
6 3.5008 8.3197 99,522.4560

1.0127 1.0571 48,681.6983
Total 18.2070 103.6434 178.4906 0.8979 80.0408 0.8460 80.8868 21.6365 0.7999 22.4364

0.2359 16.6999 48,341.361
6 48,341.361
6 Worker 15.8220 8.3547 143.0519 0.4533 62.0708 0.2563 62.3271 16.4641 48,614.302
0 48,614.302
0 2.4880 7.2626 50,840.7577

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.3850 95.2888 35.4387 0.4446 17.9701 0.5896 18.5597 5.1725 0.5640 5.7365 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
742
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
96,955.663
6 96,955.663
6 3.5008 8.3197 99,522.4560

1.0127 1.0571 48,681.6983
Total 18.2070 103.6434 178.4906 0.8979 80.0408 0.8460 80.8868 21.6365 0.7999 22.4364

0.2359 16.6999 48,341.361
6 48,341.361
6 Worker 15.8220 8.3547 143.0519 0.4533 62.0708 0.2563 62.3271 16.4641 48,614.302
0 48,614.302
0 2.4880 7.2626 50,840.7577

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.3850 95.2888 35.4387 0.4446 17.9701 0.5896 18.5597 5.1725 0.5640 5.7365 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
743
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
95,126.082
8 95,126.082
8 3.4795 8.1301 97,635.8502

0.9348 1.0138 47,799.8481
Total 17.2026 101.8981 172.1408 0.8772 80.0416 0.8233 80.8649 21.6368 0.7789 22.4157

0.2202 16.6842 47,474.364
9 47,474.364
9 Worker 14.8498 7.7347 136.6243 0.4420 62.0708 0.2392 62.3100 16.4641 47,651.717
9 47,651.717
9 2.5447 7.1163 49,836.0021

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.3528 94.1634 35.5165 0.4352 17.9708 0.5841 18.5549 5.1727 0.5587 5.7315 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
744
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.7137 2,224.5878
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.7452 2,206.7452

0.0000 0.0000

0.7137 2,224.5878
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.5 Paving - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
95,126.082
8 95,126.082
8 3.4795 8.1301 97,635.8502

0.9348 1.0138 47,799.8481
Total 17.2026 101.8981 172.1408 0.8772 80.0416 0.8233 80.8649 21.6368 0.7789 22.4157

0.2202 16.6842 47,474.364
9 47,474.364
9 Worker 14.8498 7.7347 136.6243 0.4420 62.0708 0.2392 62.3100 16.4641 47,651.717
9 47,651.717
9 2.5447 7.1163 49,836.0021

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.3528 94.1634 35.5165 0.4352 17.9708 0.5841 18.5549 5.1727 0.5587 5.7315 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
745
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.7137 2,224.5878
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.7452 2,206.7452

0.0000 0.0000

0.7137 2,224.5878
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

94.2450 94.2450 1.8600e0032.0100e00394.8912

1.8600e0032.0100e00394.8912
Total 0.0295 0.0154 0.2712 8.8000e0040.1232 4.7000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.4000e0040.0331

4.4000e0048.8000e- 0.0331 94.2450 94.2450
004

0.1232 4.7000e004Worker 0.0295 0.0154 0.2712 0.1237 0.0327

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
746
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0154 281.8319
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481
003
Total 332.7788 1.1455 1.8091 0.0515 0.0515
281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319

0.0000
Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 Archit. Coating 332.6080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

94.2450 94.2450 1.8600e0032.0100e00394.8912

1.8600e0032.0100e00394.8912
Total 0.0295 0.0154 0.2712 8.8000e0040.1232 4.7000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.4000e0040.0331

4.4000e0048.8000e- 0.0331 94.2450 94.2450
004

0.1232 4.7000e004Worker 0.0295 0.0154 0.2712 0.1237 0.0327

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
747
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0154 281.8319
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481
003
Total 332.7788 1.1455 1.8091 0.0515 0.0515
281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319

0.0000
Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 Archit. Coating 332.6080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
9,493.6164 9,493.6164 0.1869 0.2027 9,558.7044

0.1869 0.2027 9,558.7044
Total 2.9696 1.5467 27.3212 0.0884 12.4125 0.0478 12.4604 3.2924 0.0440 3.3364 Worker 2.9696 1.5467 27.3212 0.0884 12.4125 0.0478 12.4604 3.2924 0.0440 3.3364 9,493.6164 9,493.6164

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
748
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

15.5779 355,532.304
3 4.2 Trip Summary Information
112.4144 350,318.89
70 350,318.89
70 Unmitigated 193.9048 169.0665 1,556.7098 3.2547 413.7438 2.2956 416.0394 110.2731 2.1413 22.8479 350,318.89
70 350,318.89
70 22.8479 15.5779 355,532.304
3 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 193.9048 169.0665 1,556.7098 3.2547 413.7438 2.2956 416.0394 110.2731 2.1413 112.4144 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2 5
Exhaust
PM2 5
PM2.5 Total

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
9,493.6164 9,493.6164 0.1869 0.2027 9,558.7044

0.1869 0.2027 9,558.7044
Total 2.9696 1.5467 27.3212 0.0884 12.4125 0.0478 12.4604 3.2924 0.0440 3.3364 Worker 2.9696 1.5467 27.3212 0.0884 12.4125 0.0478 12.4604 3.2924 0.0440 3.3364 9,493.6164 9,493.6164

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
749
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.000615 0.005178

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
City Park 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Apartments Low Rise 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2
Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 Regional Shopping Center 9.50 7.30 7.30 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Government Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 62.00 5.00 50 34 16 General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 General Light Industry 9.50 7.30 7.30 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 Elementary School 9.50 7.30 7.30 65.00 30.00 5.00 63 25 12 Condo/Townhouse 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 City Park 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Apartments Low Rise 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by 164,115,798

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Total 82,366.35 87,798.01 49,522.60 164,115,798
82,491,429
Single Family Housing 7,876.11 7,958.41 7135.41 21,502,377 21,502,377 Regional Shopping Center 48,570.49 59,339.80 27151.50 82,491,429 4,747,438
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 2,614.40 2,560.00 1859.20 4,747,438
10,280,761
Government Office Building 570.00 0.00 0.00 698,201 698,201 General Office Building 5,683.50 1,288.26 408.37 10,280,761 3,419,341
General Light Industry 52.00 20.88 52.40 139,002 139,002 Elementary School 2,171.07 0.00 0.00 3,419,341
312,163
Condo/Townhouse 8,816.00 9,807.80 7559.72 24,254,851 24,254,851 City Park 99.18 249.26 278.40 312,163
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 5,913.60 6,573.60 5077.60 16,270,234 16,270,234 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
750
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003

1.5003 1.5003 23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 NaturalGas 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003
Mitigated

2.1714 18.9539 10.8160
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.000615 0.005178

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
Single Family Housing 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Regional Shopping Center 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648

0.000615 0.005178
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
Hotel 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Government Office Building 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648

0.000615 0.005178
General Office Building 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
General Light Industry 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Elementary School 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 Condo/Townhouse 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178 751
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated
23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.1162 6,377.0264
Total 2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003

0.4015 6,339.3548 6,339.3548 0.1215
1,009.5923 0.0194 0.0185 1,015.5918
Single Family
Housing
53884.5 0.5811 4.9658 2.1131 0.0317 0.4015 0.4015 0.4015

0.7067 5.0500e- 0.0639 0.0639 1,009.5923
003
Regional Shopping 0.0639 0.0639
Center
8581.53 0.0926 0.8413

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0932 5,114.6714
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.3220 5,084.4571 5,084.4571 0.0975

55.4231 1.0600e0031.0200e00355.7524
Hotel 43217.9 0.4661 4.2371 3.5591 0.0254 0.3220 0.3220 0.3220

3.5100e0030.0388 2.8000e- 3.5100e-003 55.4231
004

3.5100e0033.5100e003Government Office
Building
471.096 5.0800e0030.0462
1,228.0580 1,228.0580 0.0235 0.0225 1,235.3558

9.8000e00453.8491
General Office
Building
10438.5 0.1126 1.0234 0.8596 6.1400e0030.0778 0.0778 0.0778 0.0778

3.3900e-003 53.5310 53.5310 1.0300e003
532.4321 0.0102 9.7600e003535.5960
General Light
Industry
455.014 4.9100e0030.0446 0.0375 2.7000e0043.3900e0033.3900e0033.3900e003

0.3727 2.6600e- 0.0337 0.0337 532.4321
003
Elementary School 4525.67 0.0488 0.4437 0.0337 0.0337
5,862.6897 5,862.6897 0.1124 0.1075 5,897.5288

0.0000 0.0000
Condo/Townhouse 49832.9 0.5374 4.5924 1.9542 0.0293 0.3713 0.3713 0.3713 0.3713

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3,522.5925 0.0675 0.0646 3,543.5255
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Apartments Low 1.1742 0.0176 0.2231 0.2231 0.2231 0.2231 3,522.5925 Rise
29942 0.3229 2.7594
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
752
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.1162 6,377.0264
Total 2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003

0.4015 6,339.3548 6,339.3548 0.1215
1,009.5923 0.0194 0.0185 1,015.5918
Single Family
Housing

53.8845 0.5811 4.9658 2.1131 0.0317 0.4015 0.4015 0.4015

0.7067 5.0500e- 0.0639 0.0639 1,009.5923
003
Regional Shopping 0.0639 0.0639
Center

8.58153 0.0926 0.8413

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0932 5,114.6714
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.3220 5,084.4571 5,084.4571 0.0975

55.4231 1.0600e0031.0200e00355.7524
Hotel 43.2179 0.4661 4.2371 3.5591 0.0254 0.3220 0.3220 0.3220

3.5100e0030.0388 2.8000e- 3.5100e-003 55.4231
004

3.5100e0033.5100e003Government Office
Building

0.471096 5.0800e0030.0462
1,228.0580 1,228.0580 0.0235 0.0225 1,235.3558

9.8000e00453.8491
General Office
Building

10.4385 0.1126 1.0234 0.8596 6.1400e0030.0778 0.0778 0.0778 0.0778

3.3900e-003 53.5310 53.5310 1.0300e003
532.4321 0.0102 9.7600e003535.5960
General Light
Industry

0.455014 4.9100e0030.0446 0.0375 2.7000e0043.3900e0033.3900e0033.3900e003

0.3727 2.6600e- 0.0337 0.0337 532.4321
003
Elementary School 4.52567 0.0488 0.4437 0.0337 0.0337
5,862.6897 5,862.6897 0.1124 0.1075 5,897.5288

0.0000 0.0000
Condo/Townhouse 49.8329 0.5374 4.5924 1.9542 0.0293 0.3713 0.3713 0.3713 0.3713

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3,522.5925 0.0675 0.0646 3,543.5255
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Apartments Low 1.1742 0.0176 0.2231 0.2231 0.2231 0.2231 3,522.5925 Rise

29.942 0.3229 2.7594
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
NaturalGas PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
753
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 417.6291 417.6291 0.3994 427.6147

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.9435 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Consumer Products 133.9265 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating

10.0238
N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
417.6291 417.6291 0.3994 0.0000 427.6147

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147
Unmitigated 150.8938 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 Mitigated 141.1486 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior
754
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total 141.1486 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 417.6291 417.6291 0.3994 427.6147

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.9435 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Consumer Products 124.1813 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating

10.0238
CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147
Mitigated
Total 150.8938 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 755
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:17 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day
Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number
756

0.004

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2030
Utility Company Southern California Edison
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Regional Shopping Center 1,574.00 1000sqft 36.13 1,574,000.00 3372
Single Family Housing 823.00 Dwelling Unit 248.31 1,481,400.00 2518 Condo/Townhouse 1,102.00 Dwelling Unit 68.88 1,102,000.00 0 Apartments Low Rise 880.00 Dwelling Unit 55.00 880,000.00 2693 Hotel 320.00 Room 10.67 464,640.00
0 City Park 43.50 Acre 43.50 1,894,860.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 226.00 Acre 226.00 9,844,560.00 0 General Light Industry 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Elementary School 1,683.00 Student 3.23 140,704.47
0 Government Office Building 19.00 1000sqft 0.44 19,000.00 0 General Office Building 421.00 1000sqft 9.66 421,000.00 RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan
Ventura County, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 757
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 880.00 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 1,102.00 0.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 880.00 110.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 480.00 60.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 12,400.00 1,550.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1,240.00 155.00
tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 880.00 110.00
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 100 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 75 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100 50
tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 75.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 50.00 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumed VCAPCD Rule 55 dust control measures.

Area Mitigation - Consistent with VCAPCD Rule 74.2 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings.

Water Mitigation -
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Grading -
Architectural Coating - Consistent with VCAPCD Rule 74.2 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings.

Vehicle Trips - Based on Traffic Study
Woodstoves - No woodstoves, no fireplace
Area Coating - Consistent with VCAPCD Rule 74.2 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings.

Land Use - Based on Traffic Study Adopted Specific Plan land uses. Specific Plan area is 702 acres.

Construction Phase - Estimated construction assumption. 758
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 37.75 30.86
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.44 9.57
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 22.59 30.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 8.17
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.96 6.50
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.74 13.50
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 7.32 8.00
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.89 1.29
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 7.32 6.72
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 2.28
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 21.10 17.25
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.55 8.67
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 0.97
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 5.81
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.28 6.86
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.00 6.55
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.28 5.77
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 6.40
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 46.12 37.70
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.54 9.67
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 3.06
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 8.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.14 8.90
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.99 2.61
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.14 7.47
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 5.73
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 823.00 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 267.21 248.31
759
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.5272 9.5745 110,808.776
9 Mitigated Construction

1.5437 23.1786 0.0000 107,842.39
29 107,842.39
29 Maximum 336.0176 135.1432 243.5710 1.0261 80.0416 1.6377 81.6741 21.6368 95,720.120
6 95,720.120
6 4.1649 8.2580 98,285.1207

4.1925 8.4527 100,136.260
7 2029 336.0176 119.9550 187.9159 0.8859 80.0416 1.3534 81.3950 21.6368 1.2776 22.9144 0.0000

1.2987 22.9353 0.0000 97,512.537
9 97,512.537
9 2028 20.8680 121.8381 194.0846 0.9061 80.0408 1.3762 81.4170 21.6365 99,422.088
3 99,422.088
3 4.2310 8.6581 102,107.975
0 4.2841 8.8813 104,267.838
2 2027 21.9616 123.7875 201.0455 0.9278 80.0400 1.3980 81.4380 21.6362 1.3190 22.9552 0.0000

1.3391 22.9751 0.0000 101,514.11
51 101,514.11
51 2026 23.1364 126.1625 209.4630 0.9515 80.0392 1.4197 81.4589 21.6359 103,637.17
39 103,637.17
39 4.3456 9.1055 106,459.255
8 4.4271 9.3460 108,744.460
4 2025 24.3948 128.5862 219.1911 0.9760 80.0382 1.4377 81.4760 21.6356 1.3559 22.9914 0.0000

1.4501 23.0854 0.0000 105,848.68
85 105,848.68
85 2024 25.9164 132.1101 230.7389 1.0024 80.0373 1.5382 81.5756 21.6353 107,842.39
29 107,842.39
29 4.5272 9.5745 110,808.776
9 1.9493 4.4900e0036,202.4233
2023 27.5883 135.1432 243.5710 1.0261 80.0364 1.6377 81.6741 21.6349 1.5437 23.1786 0.0000 2022 3.6915 38.8903 29.5861 0.0635 19.8049 1.6358 21.4183 10.1417 1.5050 11.6260 0.0000 6,152.3527 6,152.3527 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
760
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.07 0.00 2.03 3.81 0.00 3.57 0.00

4.5272 9.5745 110,808.776
9 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2

1.5437 23.1786 0.0000 107,842.39
29 107,842.39
29 Maximum 336.0176 135.1432 243.5710 1.0261 80.0416 1.6377 81.6741 21.6368 95,720.120
6 95,720.120
6 4.1649 8.2580 98,285.1207

4.1925 8.4527 100,136.260
7 2029 336.0176 119.9550 187.9159 0.8859 80.0416 1.3534 81.3950 21.6368 1.2776 22.9144 0.0000

1.2987 22.9353 0.0000 97,512.537
9 97,512.537
9 2028 20.8680 121.8381 194.0846 0.9061 80.0408 1.3762 81.4170 21.6365 99,422.088
3 99,422.088
3 4.2310 8.6581 102,107.975
0 4.2841 8.8813 104,267.838
2 2027 21.9616 123.7875 201.0455 0.9278 80.0400 1.3980 81.4380 21.6362 1.3190 22.9552 0.0000

1.3391 22.9751 0.0000 101,514.11
51 101,514.11
51 2026 23.1364 126.1625 209.4630 0.9515 80.0392 1.4197 81.4589 21.6359 103,637.17
39 103,637.17
39 4.3456 9.1055 106,459.255
8 4.4271 9.3460 108,744.460
4 2025 24.3948 128.5862 219.1911 0.9760 80.0382 1.4377 81.4760 21.6356 1.3559 22.9914 0.0000

1.4501 23.0854 0.0000 105,848.68
85 105,848.68
85 2024 25.9164 132.1101 230.7389 1.0024 80.0373 1.5382 81.5756 21.6353 107,842.39
29 107,842.39
29 4.5272 9.5745 110,808.776
9 1.9493 4.4900e0036,202.4233
2023 27.5883 135.1432 243.5710 1.0261 80.0364 1.6377 81.6741 21.6349 1.5437 23.1786 0.0000 2022 3.6915 38.8903 29.5861 0.0635 7.8141 1.6358 9.4275 3.9792 1.5050 5.4635 0.0000 6,152.3527 6,152.3527 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
761
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.00 0.00 0.00
N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 2.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PM2.5
Total
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2
362,786.78
63 362,786.78
63 25.6445 17.0825 368,518.482
2 24.7911 16.6482 344,261.970
4 Total 328.3856 208.3074 1,923.0985 3.2778 413.7438 5.0820 418.8258 110.2731 4.9276 115.2007 0.0000

2.1425 112.4156 338,681.02
68 338,681.02
68 Mobile 185.0656 186.6888 1,681.0417 3.1471 413.7438 2.2968 416.0406 110.2731 23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147
Energy 2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 Area 141.1486 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
362,786.78
63 362,786.78
63 25.6445 17.0825 368,518.482
2 24.7911 16.6482 344,261.970
4 Total 338.1308 208.3074 1,923.0985 3.2778 413.7438 5.0820 418.8258 110.2731 4.9276 115.2007 0.0000

2.1425 112.4156 338,681.02
68 338,681.02
68 Mobile 185.0656 186.6888 1,681.0417 3.1471 413.7438 2.2968 416.0406 110.2731 23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147
Energy 2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 Area 150.8938 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 Category lb/day lb/day
762
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84

0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231

0.48 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367

0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187

0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97
Load Factor
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 90
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 465
Acres of Paving: 226
Residential Indoor: 7,013,385; Residential Outdoor: 2,337,795; Non-Residential Indoor: 3,941,017; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,313,672; Striped

OffRoad Equipment
5 110
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/31/2029 12/31/2029 5 110 4 Paving Paving 2/27/2029 7/30/2029
5 155
3 Building Construction Building Construction 3/21/2023 2/26/2029 5 1550 2 Grading Grading 8/16/2022 3/20/2023
Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/24/2022 8/15/2022 5 60 Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
763
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 1,511.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 7,556.00 2,655.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Hauling
Vehicle Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

0.48 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78

0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132

0.45 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46
764
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 7.6662 0.0000 7.6662 3.9400 0.0000 3.9400 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
126.8480 126.8480 4.5500e0034.0400e003128.1667

4.5500e0034.0400e003128.1667
Total 0.0600 0.0421 0.4901 1.2500e0030.1479 8.5000e0040.1487 0.0392 7.8000e0040.0400

7.8000e0041.2500e- 0.0400 126.8480 126.8480
003

0.1479 8.5000e004Worker 0.0600 0.0421 0.4901 0.1487 0.0392

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.1922 3,715.8655
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 765
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.3 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
126.8480 126.8480 4.5500e0034.0400e003128.1667

4.5500e0034.0400e003128.1667
Total 0.0600 0.0421 0.4901 1.2500e0030.1479 8.5000e0040.1487 0.0392 7.8000e0040.0400

7.8000e0041.2500e- 0.0400 126.8480 126.8480
003

0.1479 8.5000e004Worker 0.0600 0.0421 0.4901 0.1487 0.0392

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.1922 3,715.8655
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 7.6662 1.6126 9.2788 3.9400 1.4836 5.4235 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.0619 3,686.0619 1.1922 3,715.8655 766
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 3.5894 0.0000 3.5894 1.4250 0.0000 1.4250 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
140.9422 140.9422 5.0500e0034.4900e003142.4075

5.0500e0034.4900e003142.4075
Total 0.0667 0.0468 0.5446 1.3900e0030.1643 9.4000e0040.1652 0.0436 8.7000e0040.0445

8.7000e0041.3900e- 0.0445 140.9422 140.9422
003

0.1643 9.4000e004Worker 0.0667 0.0468 0.5446 0.1652 0.0436

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.9442 6,060.0158
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 9.2036 1.6349 10.8385 3.6538 1.5041 5.1579 6,011.4105 6,011.4105 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.4105 6,011.4105 1.9442 6,060.0158 767
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 9.2036 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.3 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
140.9422 140.9422 5.0500e0034.4900e003142.4075

5.0500e0034.4900e003142.4075
Total 0.0667 0.0468 0.5446 1.3900e0030.1643 9.4000e0040.1652 0.0436 8.7000e0040.0445

8.7000e0041.3900e- 0.0445 140.9422 140.9422
003

0.1643 9.4000e004Worker 0.0667 0.0468 0.5446 0.1652 0.0436

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.9442 6,060.0158
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 3.5894 1.6349 5.2243 1.4250 1.5041 2.9291 0.0000 6,011.4105 6,011.4105 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.4105 6,011.4105 1.9442 6,060.0158 768
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fugitive Dust 3.5894 0.0000 3.5894 1.4250 0.0000 1.4250 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
137.2614 137.2614 4.5900e0034.1700e003138.6174

4.5900e0034.1700e003138.6174
Total 0.0621 0.0417 0.5041 1.3400e0030.1643 8.9000e0040.1652 0.0436 8.2000e0040.0444

8.2000e0041.3400e- 0.0444 137.2614 137.2614
003

0.1643 8.9000e004Worker 0.0621 0.0417 0.5041 0.1652 0.0436

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.9442 6,060.0836
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 9.2036 1.4245 10.6281 3.6538 1.3105 4.9643 6,011.4777 6,011.4777 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 6,011.4777 6,011.4777 1.9442 6,060.0836 769
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
137.2614 137.2614 4.5900e0034.1700e003138.6174

4.5900e0034.1700e003138.6174
Total 0.0621 0.0417 0.5041 1.3400e0030.1643 8.9000e0040.1652 0.0436 8.2000e0040.0444

8.2000e0041.3400e- 0.0444 137.2614 137.2614
003

0.1643 8.9000e004Worker 0.0621 0.0417 0.5041 0.1652 0.0436

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

1.9442 6,060.0836
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 3.5894 1.4245 5.0139 1.4250 1.3105 2.7355 0.0000 6,011.4777 6,011.4777 Off-Road 3.3217 34.5156 28.0512 0.0621 1.4245 1.4245 1.3105 1.3105 0.0000 6,011.4777 6,011.4777 1.9442 6,060.0836 770
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061

0.6079 2,570.4061
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
105,287.18
30 105,287.18
30 3.9193 9.5745 108,238.370
9 1.7323 1.5739 52,369.6522
Total 26.0156 120.7583 227.3270 0.9992 80.0364 0.9380 80.9743 21.6349 0.8852 22.5201

0.3097 16.7738 51,857.337
4 51,857.337
4 Worker 23.4774 15.7359 190.4462 0.5067 62.0708 0.3363 62.4071 16.4641 53,429.845
6 53,429.845
6 2.1870 8.0007 55,868.7186

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.5382 105.0224 36.8809 0.4925 17.9656 0.6017 18.5673 5.1708 0.5755 5.7464 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.2099 2,555.2099 0.6079 2,570.4061 771
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 0.6044 2,570.8077

0.6044 2,570.8077
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
105,287.18
30 105,287.18
30 3.9193 9.5745 108,238.370
9 1.7323 1.5739 52,369.6522
Total 26.0156 120.7583 227.3270 0.9992 80.0364 0.9380 80.9743 21.6349 0.8852 22.5201

0.3097 16.7738 51,857.337
4 51,857.337
4 Worker 23.4774 15.7359 190.4462 0.5067 62.0708 0.3363 62.4071 16.4641 53,429.845
6 53,429.845
6 2.1870 8.0007 55,868.7186

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.5382 105.0224 36.8809 0.4925 17.9656 0.6017 18.5673 5.1708 0.5755 5.7464 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
772
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 0.6044 2,570.8077

0.6044 2,570.8077
Total 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4716 13.4438 16.1668 0.0270 0.6133 0.6133 0.5769 0.5769 0.0000 2,555.6989 2,555.6989 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
103,292.98
96 103,292.98
96 3.8227 9.3460 106,173.652
8 1.5799 1.4679 51,144.4055
Total 24.4448 118.6663 214.5721 0.9755 80.0373 0.9249 80.9623 21.6353 0.8732 22.5085

0.2964 16.7604 50,667.469
7 50,667.469
7 Worker 21.9759 14.1211 177.8853 0.4912 62.0708 0.3219 62.3926 16.4641 52,625.519
9 52,625.519
9 2.2428 7.8780 55,029.2472

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4690 104.5452 36.6868 0.4843 17.9666 0.6030 18.5696 5.1712 0.5769 5.7480 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
773
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
103,292.98
96 103,292.98
96 3.8227 9.3460 106,173.652
8 1.5799 1.4679 51,144.4055
Total 24.4448 118.6663 214.5721 0.9755 80.0373 0.9249 80.9623 21.6353 0.8732 22.5085

0.2964 16.7604 50,667.469
7 50,667.469
7 Worker 21.9759 14.1211 177.8853 0.4912 62.0708 0.3219 62.3926 16.4641 52,625.519
9 52,625.519
9 2.2428 7.8780 55,029.2472

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4690 104.5452 36.6868 0.4843 17.9666 0.6030 18.5696 5.1712 0.5769 5.7480 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
774
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
101,080.69
96 101,080.69
96 3.7446 9.1055 103,887.757
8 1.4383 1.3743 49,859.8470
Total 23.0274 116.1165 203.1065 0.9490 80.0382 0.9102 80.9484 21.6356 0.8596 22.4952

0.2827 16.7468 49,414.337
9 49,414.337
9 Worker 20.6200 12.7416 166.5653 0.4743 62.0708 0.3071 62.3778 16.4641 51,666.361
7 51,666.361
7 2.3063 7.7312 54,027.9107

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4074 103.3749 36.5411 0.4747 17.9675 0.6031 18.5706 5.1715 0.5769 5.7484 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
775
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
101,080.69
96 101,080.69
96 3.7446 9.1055 103,887.757
8 1.4383 1.3743 49,859.8470
Total 23.0274 116.1165 203.1065 0.9490 80.0382 0.9102 80.9484 21.6356 0.8596 22.4952

0.2827 16.7468 49,414.337
9 49,414.337
9 Worker 20.6200 12.7416 166.5653 0.4743 62.0708 0.3071 62.3778 16.4641 51,666.361
7 51,666.361
7 2.3063 7.7312 54,027.9107

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.4074 103.3749 36.5411 0.4747 17.9675 0.6031 18.5706 5.1715 0.5769 5.7484 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
776
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
98,957.640
8 98,957.640
8 3.6832 8.8813 101,696.340
1 1.3148 1.2963 48,666.9259
Total 21.7690 113.6928 193.3784 0.9245 80.0392 0.8922 80.9313 21.6359 0.8429 22.4788

0.2686 16.7326 48,247.766
3 48,247.766
3 Worker 19.4173 11.5942 156.8978 0.4593 62.0708 0.2918 62.3625 16.4641 50,709.874
4 50,709.874
4 2.3684 7.5850 53,029.4142

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.3517 102.0986 36.4806 0.4652 17.9684 0.6004 18.5688 5.1719 0.5743 5.7462 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
777
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
98,957.640
8 98,957.640
8 3.6832 8.8813 101,696.340
1 1.3148 1.2963 48,666.9259
Total 21.7690 113.6928 193.3784 0.9245 80.0392 0.8922 80.9313 21.6359 0.8429 22.4788

0.2686 16.7326 48,247.766
3 48,247.766
3 Worker 19.4173 11.5942 156.8978 0.4593 62.0708 0.2918 62.3625 16.4641 50,709.874
4 50,709.874
4 2.3684 7.5850 53,029.4142

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.3517 102.0986 36.4806 0.4652 17.9684 0.6004 18.5688 5.1719 0.5743 5.7462 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
778
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
96,865.613
9 96,865.613
9 3.6301 8.6581 99,536.4770

1.2066 1.2299 47,589.9081
Total 20.5942 111.3178 184.9609 0.9008 80.0400 0.8705 80.9105 21.6362 0.8227 22.4589

0.2526 16.7167 47,193.250
0 47,193.250
0 Worker 18.2893 10.6109 148.5273 0.4458 62.0708 0.2745 62.3452 16.4641 49,672.364
0 49,672.364
0 2.4235 7.4283 51,946.5689

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.3049 100.7069 36.4336 0.4550 17.9693 0.5960 18.5652 5.1722 0.5701 5.7423 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
779
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
96,865.613
9 96,865.613
9 3.6301 8.6581 99,536.4770

1.2066 1.2299 47,589.9081
Total 20.5942 111.3178 184.9609 0.9008 80.0400 0.8705 80.9105 21.6362 0.8227 22.4589

0.2526 16.7167 47,193.250
0 47,193.250
0 Worker 18.2893 10.6109 148.5273 0.4458 62.0708 0.2745 62.3452 16.4641 49,672.364
0 49,672.364
0 2.4235 7.4283 51,946.5689

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.3049 100.7069 36.4336 0.4550 17.9693 0.5960 18.5652 5.1722 0.5701 5.7423 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
780
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
94,956.063
5 94,956.063
5 3.5916 8.4527 97,564.7626

1.1125 1.1737 46,639.9375
Total 19.5006 109.3684 177.9999 0.8791 80.0408 0.8486 80.8895 21.6365 0.8025 22.4390

0.2359 16.6999 46,262.367
0 46,262.367
0 Worker 17.2321 9.7760 141.4845 0.4338 62.0708 0.2563 62.3271 16.4641 48,693.696
5 48,693.696
5 2.4791 7.2790 50,924.8251

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.2685 99.5924 36.5154 0.4453 17.9701 0.5923 18.5624 5.1725 0.5666 5.7391 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
781
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
94,956.063
5 94,956.063
5 3.5916 8.4527 97,564.7626

1.1125 1.1737 46,639.9375
Total 19.5006 109.3684 177.9999 0.8791 80.0408 0.8486 80.8895 21.6365 0.8025 22.4390

0.2359 16.6999 46,262.367
0 46,262.367
0 Worker 17.2321 9.7760 141.4845 0.4338 62.0708 0.2563 62.3271 16.4641 48,693.696
5 48,693.696
5 2.4791 7.2790 50,924.8251

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.2685 99.5924 36.5154 0.4453 17.9701 0.5923 18.5624 5.1725 0.5666 5.7391 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
782
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated Construction Off-Site
2,556.4744 2,556.4744 0.6010 2,571.4981

0.6010 2,571.4981
Total 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 Off-Road 1.3674 12.4697 16.0847 0.0270 0.5276 0.5276 0.4963 0.4963 0.0000 2,556.4744 2,556.4744 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
93,163.646
2 93,163.646
2 3.5640 8.2580 95,713.6226

1.0284 1.1254 45,793.7916
Total 18.4300 107.4853 171.8312 0.8589 80.0416 0.8259 80.8674 21.6368 0.7813 22.4181

0.2202 16.6842 45,432.718
2 45,432.718
2 Worker 16.1962 9.0488 135.2492 0.4230 62.0708 0.2392 62.3100 16.4641 47,730.928
1 47,730.928
1 2.5356 7.1326 49,919.8310

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.2339 98.4365 36.5820 0.4359 17.9708 0.5866 18.5574 5.1727 0.5612 5.7339 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
783
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.7137 2,224.5878
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.7452 2,206.7452

0.0000 0.0000

0.7137 2,224.5878
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.5 Paving - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
93,163.646
2 93,163.646
2 3.5640 8.2580 95,713.6226

1.0284 1.1254 45,793.7916
Total 18.4300 107.4853 171.8312 0.8589 80.0416 0.8259 80.8674 21.6368 0.7813 22.4181

0.2202 16.6842 45,432.718
2 45,432.718
2 Worker 16.1962 9.0488 135.2492 0.4230 62.0708 0.2392 62.3100 16.4641 47,730.928
1 47,730.928
1 2.5356 7.1326 49,919.8310

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 2.2339 98.4365 36.5820 0.4359 17.9708 0.5866 18.5574 5.1727 0.5612 5.7339 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
784
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.7137 2,224.5878
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
Total 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.7452 2,206.7452

0.0000 0.0000

0.7137 2,224.5878
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.9152 8.5816 14.5780 0.0228 0.4185 0.4185 0.3850 0.3850 0.0000 2,206.7452 2,206.7452 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

90.1920 90.1920 2.0400e0032.2300e00390.9088

2.0400e0032.2300e00390.9088
Total 0.0322 0.0180 0.2685 8.4000e0040.1232 4.7000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.4000e0040.0331

4.4000e0048.4000e- 0.0331 90.1920 90.1920
004

0.1232 4.7000e004Worker 0.0322 0.0180 0.2685 0.1237 0.0327

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
785
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0154 281.8319
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 281.4481 281.4481
003
Total 332.7788 1.1455 1.8091 0.0515 0.0515
281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319

0.0000
Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 Archit. Coating 332.6080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

90.1920 90.1920 2.0400e0032.2300e00390.9088

2.0400e0032.2300e00390.9088
Total 0.0322 0.0180 0.2685 8.4000e0040.1232 4.7000e0040.1237 0.0327 4.4000e0040.0331

4.4000e0048.4000e- 0.0331 90.1920 90.1920
004

0.1232 4.7000e004Worker 0.0322 0.0180 0.2685 0.1237 0.0327

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
786
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.0154 281.8319
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

2.9700e- 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481
003
Total 332.7788 1.1455 1.8091 0.0515 0.0515
281.4481 281.4481 0.0154 281.8319

0.0000
Off-Road 0.1709 1.1455 1.8091 2.9700e0030.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0515 0.0000 Archit. Coating 332.6080 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
9,085.3411 9,085.3411 0.2056 0.2251 9,157.5462

0.2056 0.2251 9,157.5462
Total 3.2388 1.8095 27.0463 0.0846 12.4125 0.0478 12.4604 3.2924 0.0440 3.3364 Worker 3.2388 1.8095 27.0463 0.0846 12.4125 0.0478 12.4604 3.2924 0.0440 3.3364 9,085.3411 9,085.3411

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
787
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

16.6482 344,261.970
4 4.2 Trip Summary Information
112.4156 338,681.02
68 338,681.02
68 Unmitigated 185.0656 186.6888 1,681.0417 3.1471 413.7438 2.2968 416.0406 110.2731 2.1425 24.7911 338,681.02
68 338,681.02
68 24.7911 16.6482 344,261.970
4 CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 185.0656 186.6888 1,681.0417 3.1471 413.7438 2.2968 416.0406 110.2731 2.1425 112.4156 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2 5
Exhaust
PM2 5
PM2.5 Total

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
9,085.3411 9,085.3411 0.2056 0.2251 9,157.5462

0.2056 0.2251 9,157.5462
Total 3.2388 1.8095 27.0463 0.0846 12.4125 0.0478 12.4604 3.2924 0.0440 3.3364 Worker 3.2388 1.8095 27.0463 0.0846 12.4125 0.0478 12.4604 3.2924 0.0440 3.3364 9,085.3411 9,085.3411

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
788
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.000615 0.005178

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
City Park 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Apartments Low Rise 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2
Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 Regional Shopping Center 9.50 7.30 7.30 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Government Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 62.00 5.00 50 34 16 General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 General Light Industry 9.50 7.30 7.30 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 Elementary School 9.50 7.30 7.30 65.00 30.00 5.00 63 25 12 Condo/Townhouse 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 City Park 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Apartments Low Rise 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by 164,115,798

4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Total 82,366.35 87,798.01 49,522.60 164,115,798
82,491,429
Single Family Housing 7,876.11 7,958.41 7135.41 21,502,377 21,502,377 Regional Shopping Center 48,570.49 59,339.80 27151.50 82,491,429 4,747,438
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00
Hotel 2,614.40 2,560.00 1859.20 4,747,438
10,280,761
Government Office Building 570.00 0.00 0.00 698,201 698,201 General Office Building 5,683.50 1,288.26 408.37 10,280,761 3,419,341
General Light Industry 52.00 20.88 52.40 139,002 139,002 Elementary School 2,171.07 0.00 0.00 3,419,341
312,163
Condo/Townhouse 8,816.00 9,807.80 7559.72 24,254,851 24,254,851 City Park 99.18 249.26 278.40 312,163
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 5,913.60 6,573.60 5077.60 16,270,234 16,270,234 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
789
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972
NaturalGas
Unmitigated

2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003

1.5003 1.5003 23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 NaturalGas 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003
Mitigated

2.1714 18.9539 10.8160
CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.000615 0.005178

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
Single Family Housing 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Regional Shopping Center 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648

0.000615 0.005178
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
Hotel 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Government Office Building 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648

0.000615 0.005178
General Office Building 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
General Light Industry 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Elementary School 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 Condo/Townhouse 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178 790
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Mitigated
23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.1162 6,377.0264
Total 2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003

0.4015 6,339.3548 6,339.3548 0.1215
1,009.5923 0.0194 0.0185 1,015.5918
Single Family
Housing
53884.5 0.5811 4.9658 2.1131 0.0317 0.4015 0.4015 0.4015

0.7067 5.0500e- 0.0639 0.0639 1,009.5923
003
Regional Shopping 0.0639 0.0639
Center
8581.53 0.0926 0.8413

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0932 5,114.6714
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.3220 5,084.4571 5,084.4571 0.0975

55.4231 1.0600e0031.0200e00355.7524
Hotel 43217.9 0.4661 4.2371 3.5591 0.0254 0.3220 0.3220 0.3220

3.5100e0030.0388 2.8000e- 3.5100e-003 55.4231
004

3.5100e0033.5100e003Government Office
Building
471.096 5.0800e0030.0462
1,228.0580 1,228.0580 0.0235 0.0225 1,235.3558

9.8000e00453.8491
General Office
Building
10438.5 0.1126 1.0234 0.8596 6.1400e0030.0778 0.0778 0.0778 0.0778

3.3900e-003 53.5310 53.5310 1.0300e003
532.4321 0.0102 9.7600e003535.5960
General Light
Industry
455.014 4.9100e0030.0446 0.0375 2.7000e0043.3900e0033.3900e0033.3900e003

0.3727 2.6600e- 0.0337 0.0337 532.4321
003
Elementary School 4525.67 0.0488 0.4437 0.0337 0.0337
5,862.6897 5,862.6897 0.1124 0.1075 5,897.5288

0.0000 0.0000
Condo/Townhouse 49832.9 0.5374 4.5924 1.9542 0.0293 0.3713 0.3713 0.3713 0.3713

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3,522.5925 0.0675 0.0646 3,543.5255
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Apartments Low 1.1742 0.0176 0.2231 0.2231 0.2231 0.2231 3,522.5925 Rise
29942 0.3229 2.7594
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Unmitigated
NaturalGas
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
791
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior
Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Exterior
23,688.130
5 23,688.130
5 0.4540 0.4343 23,828.8972

0.1162 6,377.0264
Total 2.1714 18.9539 10.8160 0.1184 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003 1.5003

0.4015 6,339.3548 6,339.3548 0.1215
1,009.5923 0.0194 0.0185 1,015.5918
Single Family
Housing

53.8845 0.5811 4.9658 2.1131 0.0317 0.4015 0.4015 0.4015

0.7067 5.0500e- 0.0639 0.0639 1,009.5923
003
Regional Shopping 0.0639 0.0639
Center

8.58153 0.0926 0.8413

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0932 5,114.6714
Other Non-Asphalt
Surfaces
0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.3220 5,084.4571 5,084.4571 0.0975

55.4231 1.0600e0031.0200e00355.7524
Hotel 43.2179 0.4661 4.2371 3.5591 0.0254 0.3220 0.3220 0.3220

3.5100e0030.0388 2.8000e- 3.5100e-003 55.4231
004

3.5100e0033.5100e003Government Office
Building

0.471096 5.0800e0030.0462
1,228.0580 1,228.0580 0.0235 0.0225 1,235.3558

9.8000e00453.8491
General Office
Building

10.4385 0.1126 1.0234 0.8596 6.1400e0030.0778 0.0778 0.0778 0.0778

3.3900e-003 53.5310 53.5310 1.0300e003
532.4321 0.0102 9.7600e003535.5960
General Light
Industry

0.455014 4.9100e0030.0446 0.0375 2.7000e0043.3900e0033.3900e0033.3900e003

0.3727 2.6600e- 0.0337 0.0337 532.4321
003
Elementary School 4.52567 0.0488 0.4437 0.0337 0.0337
5,862.6897 5,862.6897 0.1124 0.1075 5,897.5288

0.0000 0.0000
Condo/Townhouse 49.8329 0.5374 4.5924 1.9542 0.0293 0.3713 0.3713 0.3713 0.3713

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3,522.5925 0.0675 0.0646 3,543.5255
City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Apartments Low 1.1742 0.0176 0.2231 0.2231 0.2231 0.2231 3,522.5925 Rise

29.942 0.3229 2.7594
CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
NaturalGas PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
792
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 417.6291 417.6291 0.3994 427.6147

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.9435 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Consumer Products 133.9265 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating

10.0238
N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
417.6291 417.6291 0.3994 0.0000 427.6147

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147
Unmitigated 150.8938 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 Mitigated 141.1486 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Exterior
Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2
Use Low VOC Paint - Non-Residential Interior
793
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet
Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet
Install Low Flow Toilet
Install Low Flow Shower
Use Water Efficient Irrigation System

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
Total 141.1486 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 417.6291 417.6291 0.3994 427.6147

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Landscaping 6.9435 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000

0.0000
Consumer Products 124.1813 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Architectural 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating

10.0238
CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.3994 0.0000 427.6147
Mitigated
Total 150.8938 2.6647 231.2408 0.0123 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 1.2849 0.0000 417.6291 417.6291 794
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:14 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
Boilers

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day
Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number
795

0.004

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data
Project Characteristics -
CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)
390.98 CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.033 N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2030
Utility Company Southern California Edison
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.6 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Regional Shopping Center 1,574.00 1000sqft 36.13 1,574,000.00 3372
Single Family Housing 823.00 Dwelling Unit 248.31 1,481,400.00 2518 Condo/Townhouse 1,102.00 Dwelling Unit 68.88 1,102,000.00 0 Apartments Low Rise 880.00 Dwelling Unit 55.00 880,000.00 2693 Hotel 320.00 Room 10.67 464,640.00
0 City Park 43.50 Acre 43.50 1,894,860.00 0
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 226.00 Acre 226.00 9,844,560.00 0 General Light Industry 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Elementary School 1,683.00 Student 3.23 140,704.47
0 Government Office Building 19.00 1000sqft 0.44 19,000.00 0 General Office Building 421.00 1000sqft 9.66 421,000.00 RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan
Ventura County, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 796
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 880.00 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 1,102.00 0.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 880.00 110.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 480.00 60.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 12,400.00 1,550.00tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1,240.00 155.00 tblConstDustMitigation WaterUnpavedRoadVehicleSpeed 0 15 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 880.00 110.00
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 100 50tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 75 50tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100 50tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100 50 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Interior 75.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 100.00 50.00tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 100.00 50.00 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Assumed VCAPCD Rule 55 dust control measures.Area Mitigation - Consistent with VCAPCD Rule 74.2 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings.Water Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
Grading - Architectural Coating - Consistent with VCAPCD Rule 74.2 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings.Vehicle Trips - Based on Traffic StudyWoodstoves - No woodstoves, no fireplaceArea Coating - Consistent with VCAPCD Rule 74.2 assumed VOC content of 50 grams per liter for architectural coatings.Land Use - Based on Traffic Study Adopted Specific Plan land uses. Specific Plan area is 702 acres.Construction Phase - Estimated construction assumption. 797
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 37.75 30.86tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.44 9.57tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 22.59 30.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.36 8.17tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 4.96 6.50tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 9.74 13.50tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 7.32 8.00tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.89 1.29tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 7.32 6.72tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 0.78 2.28tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 21.10 17.25tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 8.55 8.67tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.70 0.97tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 5.81tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.28 6.86tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.00 6.55tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.28 5.77tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 2.19 6.40tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 46.12 37.70 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 9.54 9.67
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.21 3.06tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 8.00tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.14 8.90tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.99 2.61tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.14 7.47tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.96 5.73 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 823.00 0.00
tblLandUse LotAcreage 267.21 248.31
798
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.5200 1.1052 12,958.9348
Mitigated Construction

0.1940 2.9784 0.0000 12,616.580
8 12,616.580
8 Maximum 18.8954 17.1709 29.8354 0.1317 10.2992 0.2067 10.5005 2.7886 2,370.4606 2,370.4606 0.1232 0.1639 2,422.3902

0.4901 0.9923 11,841.1719
2029 18.8954 3.0716 6.1773 0.0244 2.2885 0.0562 2.3448 0.6162 0.0526 0.6688 0.0000

0.1686 2.9362 0.0000 11,533.210
2 11,533.210
2 2028 2.5268 15.7162 24.8733 0.1181 10.2210 0.1787 10.3997 2.7675 11,804.426
9 11,804.426
9 0.4962 1.0203 12,120.87240.5021 1.0465 12,377.4366
2027 2.6694 16.0291 25.8706 0.1214 10.2603 0.1822 10.4425 2.7781 0.1719 2.9500 0.0000

0.1745 2.9526 0.0000 12,053.029
8 12,053.029
8 2026 2.8130 16.3367 26.9610 0.1245 10.2601 0.1850 10.4452 2.7781 12,305.430
3 12,305.430
3 0.5089 1.0728 12,637.84860.5200 1.1052 12,958.9348
2025 2.9675 16.6498 28.2220 0.1278 10.2600 0.1874 10.4474 2.7780 0.1767 2.9547 0.0000

0.1897 2.9784 0.0000 12,616.580
8 12,616.580
8 2024 3.1668 17.1709 29.8354 0.1317 10.2992 0.2012 10.5005 2.7886 10,165.198
5 10,165.198
5 0.4632 0.8816 10,439.48410.1201 3.0000e004 383.2083
2023 2.7211 14.6422 25.3339 0.1068 8.4388 0.2067 8.6456 2.2918 0.1940 2.4857 0.0000

4.3200e- 0.1190 0.6159 0.0000 380.1155 380.1155
003
2022 0.2792 2.9187 2.0697 1.1467 0.1294 1.2761 0.4968
N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
799
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 6 8-24-2023 11-23-2023 5.2333 5.23335 5-24-2023 8-23-2023 5.0719 5.0719 4 2-24-2023 5-23-2023 3.8999 3.89993 11-24-2022 2-23-2023 1.3096 1.3096 2 8-24-2022 11-23-2022 1.3990 1.39901 5-24-2022 8-23-2022 1.2120 1.2120 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 1.47 2.16 0.00 2.02 0.00

0.5200 1.1052 12,958.9344
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2

0.1940 2.9784 0.0000 12,616.580
4 12,616.580
4 Maximum 18.8954 17.1709 29.8354 0.1317 10.2992 0.2067 10.5005 2.7886 2,370.4604 2,370.4604 0.1232 0.1639 2,422.3900

0.4901 0.9923 11,841.1716
2029 18.8954 3.0716 6.1773 0.0244 2.2885 0.0562 2.3448 0.6162 0.0526 0.6688 0.0000

0.1686 2.9362 0.0000 11,533.209
9 11,533.209
9 2028 2.5268 15.7162 24.8733 0.1181 10.2210 0.1787 10.3997 2.7675 11,804.426
6 11,804.426
6 0.4962 1.0203 12,120.87210.5021 1.0465 12,377.4363
2027 2.6694 16.0291 25.8706 0.1214 10.2603 0.1822 10.4425 2.7781 0.1719 2.9500 0.0000

0.1745 2.9526 0.0000 12,053.029
4 12,053.029
4 2026 2.8130 16.3367 26.9610 0.1245 10.2601 0.1850 10.4452 2.7781 12,305.429
9 12,305.429
9 0.5089 1.0728 12,637.84820.5200 1.1052 12,958.9344
2025 2.9675 16.6498 28.2220 0.1278 10.2600 0.1874 10.4474 2.7780 0.1767 2.9547 0.0000

0.1897 2.9784 0.0000 12,616.580
4 12,616.580
4 2024 3.1668 17.1709 29.8354 0.1317 10.2992 0.2012 10.5005 2.7886 10,165.198
0 10,165.198
0 0.4632 0.8816 10,439.48360.1201 3.0000e004 383.2078
2023 2.7211 14.6422 25.3339 0.1068 8.1856 0.2067 8.3923 2.2190 0.1940 2.4130 0.0000

4.3200e- 0.1190 0.3148 0.0000 380.1150 380.1150
003
2022 0.2792 2.9187 2.0697 0.4547 0.1294 0.5841 0.1958
CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
800
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2 Overall Operational
Highest 5.2562 5.2562
30 8-24-2029 9-30-2029 4.5931 4.593129 5-24-2029 8-23-2029 3.1326 3.132628 2-24-2029 5-23-2029 0.4429 0.442927 11-24-2028 2-23-2029 4.6320 4.632026 8-24-2028 11-23-2028 4.5937 4.593725 5-24-2028 8-23-2028 4.4583 4.458324 2-24-2028 5-23-2028 4.4541 4.454123 11-24-2027 2-23-2028 4.7302 4.730222 8-24-2027 11-23-2027 4.6907 4.690721 5-24-2027 8-23-2027 4.5512 4.551220 2-24-2027 5-23-2027 4.4958 4.495819 11-24-2026 2-23-2027 4.8371 4.837118 8-24-2026 11-23-2026 4.8040 4.804017 5-24-2026 8-23-2026 4.6598 4.659816 2-24-2026 5-23-2026 4.6040 4.604015 11-24-2025 2-23-2026 4.9555 4.955514 8-24-2025 11-23-2025 4.9214 4.921413 5-24-2025 8-23-2025 4.7721 4.772112 2-24-2025 5-23-2025 4.7160 4.716011 11-24-2024 2-23-2025 5.0950 5.095010 8-24-2024 11-23-2024 5.0830 5.0830 9 5-24-2024 8-23-2024 4.9278 4.92788 2-24-2024 5-23-2024 4.9270 4.92707 11-24-2023 2-23-2024 5.2562 5.2562 801
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.3249 16.8167 0.0000 46,903.263 3.2941 2.2469 47,655.1779 7 46,903.263
7 Mobile 27.8166 27.7362 244.3286 0.4804 61.7861 0.3483 62.1344 16.4918 11,673.813
1 11,673.813
1 0.7295 0.1512 11,737.10980.0326 0.0000 34.9133
Energy 0.3963 3.4591 1.9739 0.0216 0.2738 0.2738 0.2738 0.2738 0.0000

1.1000e- 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 34.0980 34.0980
003
Area 25.1173 0.2398 20.8117 0.1156 0.1156
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
60,103.670
3 61,141.899
6 70.9633 2.7149 63,725.032112.8991 0.3169 2,033.7634
Total 55.1087 31.4351 267.1142 0.5031 61.7861 0.7378 62.5239 16.4918 0.7144 17.2062 1,038.2293 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 124.3619 1,492.4954 1,616.8574

0.0000 913.8673 54.0080 0.0000 2,264.0677

3.2941 2.2469 47,655.1779
Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 913.8673

0.3249 16.8167 0.0000 46,903.263
7 46,903.263
7 Mobile 27.8166 27.7362 244.3286 0.4804 61.7861 0.3483 62.1344 16.4918 11,673.813
1 11,673.813
1 0.7295 0.1512 11,737.10980.0326 0.0000 34.9133
Energy 0.3963 3.4591 1.9739 0.0216 0.2738 0.2738 0.2738 0.2738 0.0000

1.1000e- 0.1156 0.1156 0.0000 34.0980 34.0980
003
Area 26.8958 0.2398 20.8117 0.1156 0.1156
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
802
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 90
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 465Acres of Paving: 226 Residential Indoor: 7,013,385; Residential Outdoor: 2,337,795; Non-Residential Indoor: 3,941,017; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,313,672; Striped OffRoad Equipment
5 110
5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/31/2029 12/31/2029 5 1104 Paving Paving 2/27/2029 7/30/2029 5 155
3 Building Construction Building Construction 3/21/2023 2/26/2029 5 15502 Grading Grading 8/16/2022 3/20/2023 Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/24/2022 8/15/2022 5 60 Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date

3.63 2.30 0.51

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
N20 CO2e
Percent Reduction 3.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.40 0.36 0.40 PM2.5
Total
Fugitive Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO SO2
59,886.805
1 60,900.162
0 68.3904 2.6524 63,400.334410.3262 0.2543 1,709.0657
Total 53.3302 31.4351 267.1142 0.5031 61.7861 0.7378 62.5239 16.4918 0.7144 17.2062 1,013.3569 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 99.4895 1,275.6302 1,375.1198 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 913.8673 0.0000 913.8673 54.0080 0.0000 2,264.0677 803
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
HHDT
Architectural Coating 1 1,511.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT
Building Construction 9 7,556.00 2,655.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTGrading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Hauling Vehicle
Class
Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

0.48 Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor Vehicle
Class
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78

0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132

0.45 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46

0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84

0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231

0.48 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367

0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40Grading Graders 1 8.00 187

0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 804
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

1.2000e004 1.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 3.5118 005 4.0000e- 1.1800e-003 0.0000 3.4768 3.4768 005 4.3500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.3800e- 003 1.1600e- 003 Worker 1.6600e- 003 1.2200e- 003 0.0145

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.0324 0.0000 101.1293
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

1.1400e- 0.0445 0.3476 0.0000 100.3182 100.3182
003
Total 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 0.5897 0.0484 0.6381 0.3031
100.3182 100.3182 0.0324 0.0000 101.1293

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e003 0.0484 0.0484 0.0445 0.0445 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.5897 0.0000 0.5897 0.3031 0.0000 0.3031 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO
Water Exposed AreaReduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads

3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
805
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

1.2000e004 1.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 3.5118 005 4.0000e- 1.1800e-003 0.0000 3.4768 3.4768 005 4.3500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.3800e- 003 1.1600e- 003 Worker 1.6600e- 003 1.2200e- 003 0.0145

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.0324 0.0000 101.1292
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

1.1400e- 0.0445 0.1627 0.0000 100.3181 100.3181
003
Total 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 0.2300 0.0484 0.2784 0.1182
100.3181 100.3181 0.0324 0.0000 101.1292

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0951 0.9925 0.5909 1.1400e003 0.0484 0.0484 0.0445 0.0445 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.2300 0.0000 0.2300 0.1182 0.0000 0.1182 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

3.4768 3.4768 1.2000e004 1.1000e- 004 Total 1.6600e- 3.5118 003 1.2200e- 003 0.0145 4.0000e- 005 4.3500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.3800e- 003 1.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1800e-003 0.0000 806
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2000e004 2.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 6.4383 005 7.0000e- 2.1600e-003 0.0000 6.3742 6.3742 005 7.9800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.0300e- 003 2.1200e- 003 Worker 3.0400e- 003 2.2300e- 003 0.0266

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.0873 0.0000 272.1289
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

3.0700e- 0.0745 0.2649 0.0000 269.9463 269.9463
003
Total 0.1794 1.9228 1.4376 0.5447 0.0809 0.6256 0.1905
269.9463 269.9463 0.0873 0.0000 272.1289

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1794 1.9228 1.4376 3.0700e003 0.0809 0.0809 0.0745 0.0745 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.5447 0.0000 0.5447 0.1905 0.0000 0.1905 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.3 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

3.4768 3.4768 1.2000e004 1.1000e- 004 Total 1.6600e- 3.5118 003 1.2200e- 003 0.0145 4.0000e- 005 4.3500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.3800e- 003 1.1600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1800e-003 0.0000 807
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

2.2000e004 2.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 6.4383 005 7.0000e- 2.1600e-003 0.0000 6.3742 6.3742 005 7.9800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.0300e- 003 2.1200e- 003 Worker 3.0400e- 003 2.2300e- 003 0.0266

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.0873 0.0000 272.1286
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.0700e- 0.0745 0.1487 0.0000 269.9459 269.9459
003
Total 0.1794 1.9228 1.4376 0.2124 0.0809 0.2934 0.0743
269.9459 269.9459 0.0873 0.0000 272.1286

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.1794 1.9228 1.4376 3.0700e003 0.0809 0.0809 0.0745 0.0745 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.2124 0.0000 0.2124 0.0743 0.0000 0.0743 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

6.3742 6.3742 2.2000e004 2.0000e- 004 Total 3.0400e- 6.4383 003 2.2300e- 003 0.0266 7.0000e- 005 7.9800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.0300e- 003 2.1200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.1600e-003 0.0000 808
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

1.1000e004 1.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 3.5449 005 4.0000e- 1.2200e-003 0.0000 3.5114 3.5114 005 4.5200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.5400e- 003 1.2000e- 003 Worker 1.6000e- 003 1.1200e- 003 0.0139

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.0494 0.0000 153.9332
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

1.7400e- 0.0367 0.1560 0.0000 152.6986 152.6986
003
Total 0.0930 0.9664 0.7854 0.4152 0.0399 0.4551 0.1193
152.6986 152.6986 0.0494 0.0000 153.9332

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0930 0.9664 0.7854 1.7400e003 0.0399 0.0399 0.0367 0.0367 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.4152 0.0000 0.4152 0.1193 0.0000 0.1193 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.3 Grading - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

6.3742 6.3742 2.2000e004 2.0000e- 004 Total 3.0400e- 6.4383 003 2.2300e- 003 0.0266 7.0000e- 005 7.9800e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.0300e- 003 2.1200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.1600e-003 0.0000 809
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

1.1000e004 1.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 3.5449 005 4.0000e- 1.2200e-003 0.0000 3.5114 3.5114 005 4.5200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.5400e- 003 1.2000e- 003 Worker 1.6000e- 003 1.1200e- 003 0.0139

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.0494 0.0000 153.9331
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

1.7400e- 0.0367 0.0832 0.0000 152.6984 152.6984
003
Total 0.0930 0.9664 0.7854 0.1619 0.0399 0.2018 0.0465
152.6984 152.6984 0.0494 0.0000 153.9331

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0930 0.9664 0.7854 1.7400e003 0.0399 0.0399 0.0367 0.0367 0.0000 Fugitive Dust 0.1619 0.0000 0.1619 0.0465 0.0000 0.0465 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

3.5114 3.5114 1.1000e004 1.0000e- 004 Total 1.6000e- 3.5449 003 1.1200e- 003 0.0139 4.0000e- 005 4.5200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.5400e- 003 1.2000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.2200e-003 0.0000 810
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.2026 1.5457 19.1812 0.0521 6.2144 0.0343 6.2487 1.6507 0.0316 1.6823 0.0000 4,832.6280 4,832.6280 0.1547 0.1419 4,878.7753 4,939.9197 4,939.9197 0.2028 0.7396 5,165.3836

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.2635 10.6617 3.6964 0.0502 1.8047 0.0612 1.8659 0.5206 0.0585 0.5791 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
236.4408 236.4408 0.0563 0.0000 237.8470

0.0563 0.0000 237.8470
Total 0.1604 1.4673 1.6569 2.7500e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0672 0.0672 0.0000

2.7500e- 0.0672 0.0672 0.0000 236.4408 236.4408
003
Off-Road 0.1604 1.4673 1.6569 0.0714 0.0714
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

3.5114 3.5114 1.1000e004 1.0000e- 004 Total 1.6000e- 3.5449 003 1.1200e- 003 0.0139 4.0000e- 005 4.5200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 4.5400e- 003 1.2000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.2200e-003 0.0000 811
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.2026 1.5457 19.1812 0.0521 6.2144 0.0343 6.2487 1.6507 0.0316 1.6823 0.0000 4,832.6280 4,832.6280 0.1547 0.1419 4,878.7753 4,939.9197 4,939.9197 0.2028 0.7396 5,165.3836

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.2635 10.6617 3.6964 0.0502 1.8047 0.0612 1.8659 0.5206 0.0585 0.5791 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
236.4406 236.4406 0.0563 0.0000 237.8467

0.0563 0.0000 237.8467
Total 0.1604 1.4673 1.6569 2.7500e003 0.0714 0.0714 0.0672 0.0672 0.0000

2.7500e- 0.0672 0.0672 0.0000 236.4406 236.4406
003
Off-Road 0.1604 1.4673 1.6569 0.0714 0.0714
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total 2.4661 12.2074 22.8776 0.1022 8.0191 0.0955 8.1146 2.1713 0.0901 2.2614 0.0000 9,772.5477 9,772.5477 0.3575 0.8815 10,044.1589 812
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.6441 1.7810 22.9942 0.0648 7.9812 0.0422 8.0234 2.1200 0.0388 2.1588 0.0000 6,064.1311 6,064.1311 0.1811 0.1699 6,119.3013 6,248.7274 6,248.7274 0.2671 0.9353 6,534.1155

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3299 13.6287 4.7234 0.0634 2.3180 0.0787 2.3967 0.6687 0.0753 0.7440 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
303.7223 303.7223 0.0718 0.0000 305.5179

0.0718 0.0000 305.5179
Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e003 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000

3.5300e- 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7223 303.7223
003
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 0.0803 0.0803
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total 2.4661 12.2074 22.8776 0.1022 8.0191 0.0955 8.1146 2.1713 0.0901 2.2614 0.0000 9,772.5477 9,772.5477 0.3575 0.8815 10,044.1589 813
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.6441 1.7810 22.9942 0.0648 7.9812 0.0422 8.0234 2.1200 0.0388 2.1588 0.0000 6,064.1311 6,064.1311 0.1811 0.1699 6,119.3013 6,248.7274 6,248.7274 0.2671 0.9353 6,534.1155

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3299 13.6287 4.7234 0.0634 2.3180 0.0787 2.3967 0.6687 0.0753 0.7440 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
303.7220 303.7220 0.0718 0.0000 305.5175

0.0718 0.0000 305.5175
Total 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 3.5300e003 0.0803 0.0803 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000

3.5300e- 0.0756 0.0756 0.0000 303.7220 303.7220
003
Off-Road 0.1928 1.7611 2.1179 0.0803 0.0803
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
12,312.858
5 12,312.858
5 Total 2.9740 15.4097 27.7175 0.1282 10.2992 0.1209 10.4201 2.7886 0.1141 2.9028 0.0000 0.4482 1.1052 12,653.4169 814
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.4680 1.6006 21.4355 0.0623 7.9508 0.0401 7.9908 2.1119 0.0369 2.1488 0.0000 5,891.5057 5,891.5057 0.1641 0.1585 5,942.8402 6,111.2697 6,111.2697 0.2736 0.9143 6,390.5749

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3210 13.4219 4.6874 0.0619 2.3093 0.0785 2.3877 0.6662 0.0751 0.7412 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335

0.0711 0.0000 304.4335
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000

3.5200e- 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549
003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 0.0689 0.0689
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2025
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
12,312.858
5 12,312.858
5 Total 2.9740 15.4097 27.7175 0.1282 10.2992 0.1209 10.4201 2.7886 0.1141 2.9028 0.0000 0.4482 1.1052 12,653.4169 815
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.4680 1.6006 21.4355 0.0623 7.9508 0.0401 7.9908 2.1119 0.0369 2.1488 0.0000 5,891.5057 5,891.5057 0.1641 0.1585 5,942.8402 6,111.2697 6,111.2697 0.2736 0.9143 6,390.5749

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3210 13.4219 4.6874 0.0619 2.3093 0.0785 2.3877 0.6662 0.0751 0.7412 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331

0.0711 0.0000 304.4331
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000

3.5200e- 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545
003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 0.0689 0.0689
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
12,002.775
4 12,002.775
4 Total 2.7890 15.0225 26.1229 0.1242 10.2600 0.1185 10.3785 2.7780 0.1119 2.8900 0.0000 0.4378 1.0728 12,333.4151 816
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.3204 1.4561 20.1814 0.0604 7.9508 0.0381 7.9888 2.1119 0.0351 2.1469 0.0000 5,752.3738 5,752.3738 0.1500 0.1495 5,800.6698 5,998.0011 5,998.0011 0.2810 0.8970 6,272.3333

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3142 13.2533 4.6806 0.0607 2.3094 0.0781 2.3875 0.6662 0.0747 0.7409 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335

0.0711 0.0000 304.4335
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000

3.5200e- 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549
003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 0.0689 0.0689
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2026
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
12,002.775
4 12,002.775
4 Total 2.7890 15.0225 26.1229 0.1242 10.2600 0.1185 10.3785 2.7780 0.1119 2.8900 0.0000 0.4378 1.0728 12,333.4151 817
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.3204 1.4561 20.1814 0.0604 7.9508 0.0381 7.9888 2.1119 0.0351 2.1469 0.0000 5,752.3738 5,752.3738 0.1500 0.1495 5,800.6698 5,998.0011 5,998.0011 0.2810 0.8970 6,272.3333

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3142 13.2533 4.6806 0.0607 2.3094 0.0781 2.3875 0.6662 0.0747 0.7409 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331

0.0711 0.0000 304.4331
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000

3.5200e- 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545
003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 0.0689 0.0689
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
11,750.374
9 11,750.374
9 Total 2.6346 14.7094 24.8619 0.1210 10.2601 0.1162 10.3763 2.7781 0.1098 2.8879 0.0000 0.4310 1.0465 12,073.0031 818
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.1826 1.3323 19.0962 0.0586 7.9508 0.0358 7.9866 2.1119 0.0330 2.1448 0.0000 5,626.6242 5,626.6242 0.1375 0.1418 5,672.3256 5,875.1478 5,875.1478 0.2875 0.8785 6,144.1133

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3084 13.0695 4.6753 0.0593 2.3095 0.0776 2.3871 0.6663 0.0742 0.7404 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
302.6549 302.6549 0.0711 0.0000 304.4335

0.0711 0.0000 304.4335
Total 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000

3.5200e- 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6549 302.6549
003
Off-Road 0.1785 1.6273 2.0991 0.0689 0.0689
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2027
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
11,750.374
9 11,750.374
9 Total 2.6346 14.7094 24.8619 0.1210 10.2601 0.1162 10.3763 2.7781 0.1098 2.8879 0.0000 0.4310 1.0465 12,073.0031 819
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.1826 1.3323 19.0962 0.0586 7.9508 0.0358 7.9866 2.1119 0.0330 2.1448 0.0000 5,626.6242 5,626.6242 0.1375 0.1418 5,672.3256 5,875.1478 5,875.1478 0.2875 0.8785 6,144.1133

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3084 13.0695 4.6753 0.0593 2.3095 0.0776 2.3871 0.6663 0.0742 0.7404 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
302.6545 302.6545 0.0711 0.0000 304.4331

0.0711 0.0000 304.4331
Total 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 3.5200e003 0.0689 0.0689 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000

3.5200e- 0.0648 0.0648 0.0000 302.6545 302.6545
003
Off-Road 0.1784 1.6273 2.0991 0.0689 0.0689
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
11,501.772
0 11,501.772
0 Total 2.4910 14.4018 23.7715 0.1179 10.2603 0.1134 10.3736 2.7781 0.1072 2.8853 0.0000 0.4251 1.0203 11,816.4389 820
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.0462 1.2226 18.1135 0.0568 7.9203 0.0333 7.9536 2.1038 0.0307 2.1344 0.0000 5,494.4972 5,494.4972 0.1263 0.1348 5,537.8311 5,737.2178 5,737.2178 0.2930 0.8575 6,000.0737

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3028 12.8726 4.6688 0.0578 2.3007 0.0768 2.3775 0.6637 0.0735 0.7372 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
301.4953 301.4953 0.0709 0.0000 303.2671

0.0709 0.0000 303.2671
Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000

3.5000e- 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4953 301.4953
003
Off-Road 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 0.0686 0.0686
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2028
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
11,501.772
0 11,501.772
0 Total 2.4910 14.4018 23.7715 0.1179 10.2603 0.1134 10.3736 2.7781 0.1072 2.8853 0.0000 0.4251 1.0203 11,816.4389 821
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied Worker 2.0462 1.2226 18.1135 0.0568 7.9203 0.0333 7.9536 2.1038 0.0307 2.1344 0.0000 5,494.4972 5,494.4972 0.1263 0.1348 5,537.8311 5,737.2178 5,737.2178 0.2930 0.8575 6,000.0737

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.3028 12.8726 4.6688 0.0578 2.3007 0.0768 2.3775 0.6637 0.0735 0.7372 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
301.4949 301.4949 0.0709 0.0000 303.2667

0.0709 0.0000 303.2667
Total 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 3.5000e003 0.0686 0.0686 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000

3.5000e- 0.0645 0.0645 0.0000 301.4949 301.4949
003
Off-Road 0.1778 1.6211 2.0910 0.0686 0.0686
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
11,231.715
0 11,231.715
0 Total 2.3490 14.0951 22.7823 0.1146 10.2210 0.1101 10.3312 2.7675 0.1041 2.8716 0.0000 0.4193 0.9923 11,537.9048 822
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.5100e- 0.0184 0.0204 857.4373
003

8.7300e- 0.3363 0.0000 850.9026 850.9026
003

1.2490 4.9000e003 Worker 0.3030 0.1784 2.7296 1.2539 0.3318 886.8122 886.8122 0.0473 0.1325 927.4775

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0471 2.0059 0.7377 8.9300e003 0.3628 0.0120 0.3748 0.1047 0.0115 0.1162 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

47.5435 47.5435 0.0112 0.0000 47.8229

0.0112 0.0000 47.8229
Total 0.0280 0.2556 0.3297 5.5000e004 0.0108 0.0108 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000

5.5000e- 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000 47.5435 47.5435
004
Off-Road 0.0280 0.2556 0.3297 0.0108 0.0108
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.4 Building Construction - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
11,231.715
0 11,231.715
0 Total 2.3490 14.0951 22.7823 0.1146 10.2210 0.1101 10.3312 2.7675 0.1041 2.8716 0.0000 0.4193 0.9923 11,537.9048 823
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

4.5100e- 0.0184 0.0204 857.4373
003

8.7300e- 0.3363 0.0000 850.9026 850.9026
003

1.2490 4.9000e003 Worker 0.3030 0.1784 2.7296 1.2539 0.3318 886.8122 886.8122 0.0473 0.1325 927.4775

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0471 2.0059 0.7377 8.9300e003 0.3628 0.0120 0.3748 0.1047 0.0115 0.1162 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

47.5434 47.5434 0.0112 0.0000 47.8228

0.0112 0.0000 47.8228
Total 0.0280 0.2556 0.3297 5.5000e004 0.0108 0.0108 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000

5.5000e- 0.0102 0.0102 0.0000 47.5434 47.5434
004
Off-Road 0.0280 0.2556 0.3297 0.0108 0.0108
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total 0.3500 2.1844 3.4673 0.0177 1.6118 0.0169 1.6287 0.4364 0.0160 0.4524 0.0000 1,737.7148 1,737.7148 0.0657 0.1529 1,784.9149 824
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

1.0000e004 1.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 4.5668 005 5.0000e- 1.7900e-003 0.0000 4.5320 4.5320 005 6.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 6.6800e- 003 1.7700e- 003 Worker 1.6100e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.0145

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.0356 0.0000 110.9962
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

1.2500e- 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1059 110.1059
003
Total 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 0.0230 0.0230

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0356 0.0000 110.9962
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1.2500e- 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1059 110.1059
003
Off-Road 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 0.0230 0.0230
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.5 Paving - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
Total 0.3500 2.1844 3.4673 0.0177 1.6118 0.0169 1.6287 0.4364 0.0160 0.4524 0.0000 1,737.7148 1,737.7148 0.0657 0.1529 1,784.9149 825
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

1.0000e004 1.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 4.5668 005 5.0000e- 1.7900e-003 0.0000 4.5320 4.5320 005 6.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 6.6800e- 003 1.7700e- 003 Worker 1.6100e- 003 9.5000e- 004 0.0145

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

0.0356 0.0000 110.9960
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

1.2500e- 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1058 110.1058
003
Total 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 0.0230 0.0230

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0356 0.0000 110.9960
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1.2500e- 0.0212 0.0212 0.0000 110.1058 110.1058
003
Off-Road 0.0503 0.4720 0.8018 0.0230 0.0230
N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

4.5320 4.5320 1.0000e004 1.1000e- 004 Total 1.6100e- 4.5668 003 9.5000e- 004 0.0145 5.0000e- 005 6.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 6.6800e- 003 1.7700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.7900e-003 0.0000 826
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

9.8700e003 2.4200e- 0.0109 460.0274 003 4.6900e- 0.1804 0.0000 456.5215 456.5215 003 0.6701 2.6300e- 003 Worker 0.1625 0.0957 1.4644 0.6727 0.1780

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

7.7000e004 0.0000 14.0621
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

2.8300e003 1.6000e- 2.8300e-003 0.0000 14.0429 14.0429 004 2.8300e- 003 2.8300e- 003 Total 18.3028 0.0630 0.0995

14.0429 14.0429 7.7000e004 0.0000 14.0621

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 9.4000e003 0.0630 0.0995 1.6000e- 004 2.8300e- 003 2.8300e- 003 2.8300e- 003 2.8300e-003 0.0000 Archit. Coating 18.2934 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2029
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5

4.5320 4.5320 1.0000e004 1.1000e- 004 Total 1.6100e- 4.5668 003 9.5000e- 004 0.0145 5.0000e- 005 6.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 6.6800e- 003 1.7700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.7900e-003 0.0000 827
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

9.8700e003 2.4200e- 0.0109 460.0274 003 4.6900e- 0.1804 0.0000 456.5215 456.5215 003 0.6701 2.6300e- 003 Worker 0.1625 0.0957 1.4644 0.6727 0.1780

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Exhaust
PM2.5
SO2 Fugitive PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
ROG NOx CO

7.7000e004 0.0000 14.0620
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

2.8300e003 1.6000e- 2.8300e-003 0.0000 14.0429 14.0429 004 2.8300e- 003 2.8300e- 003 Total 18.3028 0.0630 0.0995

14.0429 14.0429 7.7000e004 0.0000 14.0620

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 9.4000e003 0.0630 0.0995 1.6000e- 004 2.8300e- 003 2.8300e- 003 2.8300e- 003 2.8300e-003 0.0000 Archit. Coating 18.2934 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4
Mitigated Construction On-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
456.5215 456.5215 9.8700e003 Total 0.1625 0.0957 1.4644 4.6900e- 0.0109 460.0274 003 0.6701 2.6300e- 003 0.6727 0.1780 2.4200e- 003 0.1804 0.0000 828
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 10,280,761
Government Office Building 570.00 0.00 0.00 698,201 698,201 General Office Building 5,683.50 1,288.26 408.37 10,280,761 3,419,341
General Light Industry 52.00 20.88 52.40 139,002 139,002 Elementary School 2,171.07 0.00 0.00 3,419,341
312,163
Condo/Townhouse 8,816.00 9,807.80 7559.72 24,254,851 24,254,851 City Park 99.18 249.26 278.40 312,163
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 5,913.60 6,573.60 5077.60 16,270,234 16,270,234 Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

3.2941 2.2469 47,655.1779

4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
47,655.1779
Unmitigated 27.8166 27.7362 244.3286 0.4804 61.7861 0.3483 62.1344 16.4918 0.3249 16.8167 0.0000 46,903.263 7 46,903.263
7 0.0000 46,903.263
7 46,903.263
7 3.2941 2.2469
CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yrMitigated 27.8166 27.7362 244.3286 0.4804 61.7861 0.3483 62.1344 16.4918 0.3249 16.8167 Exhaust Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O
PM10
PM10 Total Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5 Total

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
456.5215 456.5215 9.8700e003 Total 0.1625 0.0957 1.4644 4.6900e- 0.0109 460.0274 003 0.6701 2.6300e- 003 0.6727 0.1780 2.4200e- 003 0.1804 0.0000 829
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 1
Date: 7/7/2021 5:19 PM
RiverPark Adopted Specific Plan - Ventura County, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied

0.000615 0.005178
Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
Hotel 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Government Office Building 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648

0.000615 0.005178
General Office Building 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
General Light Industry 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Elementary School 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648

0.000615 0.005178
Condo/Townhouse 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178

0.000382 0.027795 0.000615 0.005178
City Park 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 0.000382 0.027795 Apartments Low Rise 0.570667 0.059093 0.166777 0.117104 0.024699 0.007310 0.013440 0.006292 0.000648 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2
Single Family Housing 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 Regional Shopping Center 9.50 7.30 7.30 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 9.50 7.30 7.30 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Government Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 62.00 5.00 50 34 16 General Office Building 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 General Light Industry 9.50 7.30 7.30 59.00 28.00 13.00 92 5 3 Elementary School 9.50 7.30 7.30 65.00 30.00 5.00 63 25 12 Condo/Townhouse 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 City Park 9.50 7.30 7.30 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6
Apartments Low Rise 10.80 7.30 7.50 32.90 18.00 49.10 86 11 3 Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by 164,115,798