Agenda packet — Oxnard City Council, March 15, 2022 (part 1 of 6)

Written materials relating to an item on this agenda that are distributed to the legislative bodies within 72 hours before the item is to be considered at its regularly scheduled meeting will be made available for public inspection at the City Clerk’s Office, 300 West Third Street 4th Floor during customary business hours. Agenda reports are also on the City of Oxnard web site at www.oxnard.org.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you require special assistance to participate in a meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at 385-7803. Notice at least 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to reasonably arrange for your accessibility to the meeting.

Agenda Item time estimates: (Presentation / Council Discussion / Public Comment) AGENDA

OXNARD CITY COUNCIL

OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY

OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY

OXNARD HOUSING AUTHORITY
Council Chambers, 305 West Third Street
March 15, 2022
Closed Session - 4:30 PM
Appointment Items - 5:00 PM
Regular Meeting - 6:00 PM
Zoom details to call-in for public comment during a meeting:

1. Dial Phone Number: (888) 475-4499

2. Enter Meeting ID: 897 1377 1475

3. Passcode: 424190
If you wish to speak during public comments or a particular item on the agenda, please sign-on by following the zoom calling in steps listed above. Once the Mayor calls for public speakers, press *9 to raise your hand to inform the City Clerk you would like to speak during the public speaking section for that particular item on the agenda, while in the zoom waiting room.

This meeting is being held in accordance with Assembly Bill 361, allowing members of the City Council, members of the public and staff to participate via teleconference.

Consistent with City policies imposed to promote social distancing, the facility where the City Council regularly meets is temporarily closed to the public. The public is encouraged to view the meeting from home on Spectrum channel 10, Frontier channel 35, or YouTube at Youtube.com/oxnardnews. Video recordings of the meeting are typically available online following the meeting at the City’s website at www.oxnard.org/city-meetings.
*Please see the link for the Measure M pre-recorded presentation video for each item listed on this agenda.

YOU MAY PARTICIPATE IN THE MEETING IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS:

1. EMAILING COMMENTS OR REQUESTING TO SIGN UP TO SPEAK BEFORE THE MEETING a. Submit an email to [email protected] no later than 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting (Please indicate the agenda item number in the subject line). All email correspondence will be forwarded to the City Council prior to the start of the meeting and made part of the legislative record.
b. Submit a request to speak by no later than 3 p.m. on the day of the meeting by using the form available at www.oxnard.org/citymeetings, emailing the City Clerk at [email protected], or calling the City Clerk at (805) 385-7803.

2. PROVIDING PUBLIC COMMENTS DURING THE MEETING
a. To provide public comment without requesting to speak prior to the meeting, during the meeting dial (888) 475-4499 and enter the Meeting ID and Passcode listed above as the Zoom details for this meeting. b. Public comments on agenda items shall be taken following the announcement of the item. After the item is announced, members of the public shall have three minutes to register or otherwise be recognized for the purpose of providing public comment. During this three-minute time period, public comments may be taken and the City Council or staff may discuss the item being considered or briefly respond to public comments.

Detailed participation instructions can be found at www.oxnard.org/city-meetings. 1 AMENDED AGENDA
Item M.2 Public Hearing Attachments Revised

OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY March 15, 2022 PAGE 2
In the event of a disruption which prevents a legislative body of the City of Oxnard from broadcasting a meeting using a call-in option or internet-based service option, or in the event of a disruption within the City’s control which prevents members of the public from offering public comment using the call-in option or internet-based service option, the legislative body shall take no further action on items appearing on a meeting agenda until public access to the meeting via the call-in option or internet-based service option is restored. However, if any of the broadcast options are disrupted, but any of the other broadcast options is still available to the public, the legislative body may take further action on items appearing on a meeting agenda without waiting for the disrupted broadcast option(s) to be restored. * The City has filed pre-election and post-election lawsuits regarding the validity of Measure M.

A. ROLL CALL, POSTING OF AGENDA
THE FOLLOWING LEGISLATIVE BODIES ARE MEETING: City Council and Housing Authority B. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS
At this time, a person may address the legislative body only on matters appearing on the closed session agenda. The presiding officer shall limit public comments to three minutes.

C. CLOSED SESSION (4:30 PM)

1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code section 54957.6) Agency designated representatives: Alex Nguyen, City Manager, Steve Naveau, Director of Human Resources; and Jennie Kelly, Assistant City Attorney.

Employee organization: Service Employees International Union CTW, CLC, Local 721 (SEIU Local 721); International Union of Operating Engineers AFL-CIO, Local No. 501 (IUOE Local 501); International Association of Firefighters, AFL-CIO (IAFF), Local No. 1684; Oxnard Public Safety Managers Association (OPSMA); Oxnard Peace Officers Association (OPOA); Oxnard Mid-Managers’ Association; (OMMA); and unrepresented employees: City Manager; City Attorney; Assistant City Manager; Chief Financial Officer; City Clerk; Assistant City Treasurer/Director of Revenue and Licensing; Deputy City Manager; Community Development Director; Fire Chief; Housing Director; Human Resources Director; I.T. Director; Cultural and Community Services Director; Police Chief; Public Works Director (Department Directors); Chief Assistant City Attorney; Assistant City Attorney; Deputy City Attorney.

Legislative Body: City Council
D. APPOINTMENT ITEMS (5:00 PM)

1. SUBJECT: Update by District Attorney Erik Nasarenko on the Family Justice Center in Oxnard.

E. OPENING CEREMONIES (6:00 PM)
Pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States.

F. CEREMONIAL ITEMS

1. SUBJECT: Presentation of a Proclamation Designating March 31, 2022 as "Cesar E. Chavez Day." G. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
A person may address the legislative body only on matters not appearing on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body. Speaker requests shall be submitted as set forth on the first page of this agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. After 30 minutes, if all speakers have not had the opportunity to speak, the remaining speakers will be given an opportunity to speak prior to adjournment of the meeting. The legislative body cannot enter into a detailed discussion or take action on any items presented during public comments at this time. Such items may only be referred to the City 2 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY March 15, 2022 PAGE 3
Manager/Executive Director/Secretary for administrative action or scheduled on a subsequent agenda for discussion. Persons wishing to speak on public hearing items should do so at the time of the hearing.

H. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY
The City Manager/Executive Director/Secretary shall report on items of interest to the legislative body occurring since the last meeting. The legislative body cannot enter into detailed discussion or take action on any item presented during this report. Such items may only be referred to the City Manager/Executive Director/Secretary for administrative action or scheduled on a subsequent agenda for discussion.

1. City Manager Department
SUBJECT: COVID-19 Update from Director of Emergency Services. (10/5/5) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Receive and file an update from the Director of Emergency Services ("Director") on the COVID19 Local Emergency ("Emergency"); and

2. Ratify orders issued by the Director pertaining to the Emergency, potentially including an order addressing freight container shipping congestion and orders rescinding or modifying previously issued orders.

Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Alexander Nguyen, (805) 385-7430
I. CITY COUNCIL/HOUSING AUTHORITY/SUCCESSOR AGENCY/FINANCING AUTHORITY

BUSINESS/COMMITTEE REPORTS
At this time, a member of the legislative body may make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his or her activities. Further, members of the legislative body may request to schedule consideration of whether to place an item on a future agenda. The legislative body cannot enter into detailed discussion or take action on any item presented during this report. The member's report shall not exceed three minutes, unless additional time is granted by the presiding officer.

1. City Manager Department
SUBJECT: Appointment of Voting Delegate and Alternate for Southern California Association of Governments General Assembly.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint Councilwoman Gabriela Basua as the City's voting delegate to attend the 2022 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) General Assembly scheduled for May 5 - 6, 2022 in Palm Desert, California and appoint an alternate delegate.

Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Alexander Nguyen, (805) 385-7430
J. REVIEW OF INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
The members of the legislative body will consider whether to remove Information/Consent Agenda items for discussion later during the meeting.

K. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
At this time, a person may address the legislative body only on matters appearing on the information/consent agenda. The presiding officer shall limit public comments to three minutes.

L. INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
3 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY March 15, 2022 PAGE 4

1. City Clerk Department
SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the minutes of the February 9, 2022 special meeting, the February 15, 2022 regular meeting, and the February 16, 2022 special meeting as presented.

Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Rose Chaparro, (805) 385-7805

2. City Attorney Department
SUBJECT: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Oxnard City Code Section 2-2.5.Regarding the Boundaries and Identifying Number of Each City Council District.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an Ordinance that amends Oxnard City Code Section 2-2.5 regarding the boundaries and identifying number of each City Council district.

Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Stephen Fischer, (805) 385-7483

3. Finance Department
SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring the Intent of the City to be Reimbursed for Certain Capital Expenditures from the Proceeds of Indebtedness
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution declaring the intent of the City to be reimbursed for certain capital expenditures from the proceeds of indebtedness. (Finance and Governance Committee approved 3-0)
Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Betsy George, 805-200-5400

4. Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Third Amendment to Agreement A-8243 with Northern Digital, Inc. for Water System SCADA Design Project PW 20-97
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute a Third Amendment to Agreement A-8243 with Northern Digital, Inc. in the amount of $78,500 for a new not to exceed contract amount of $344,700 for additional design work required for the Water System Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Design Project PW 20-97 (Project No. 206509).
(This item did not originate in Committee as this is a capital improvement project specifically listed in the Capital Improvement Program budget, which was previously approved by the City Council.)
Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Michael Wolfe, (805) 385-8055

5. Fire Department
SUBJECT: Purchase Order Western Extrication Specialist Inc $316,748.40.

RECOMMENDATION: That City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a Purchase Order with Western Extrication Specialists Inc. for $316,748.40 to purchase battery-operated extrication equipment.
(Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development Committee approved 3-0.) Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Alexander Hamilton, (805) 385-7700
4 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY March 15, 2022 PAGE 5

6. Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Resolution for a Grant from California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to:

1. Accept a grant from the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program in the amount of $1,258,764.85 for delinquent water charges related to COVID-19;

2. Apply for a grant from the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program in the amount of $848,092.67 for delinquent wastewater charges related to COVID-19; and

3. Execute grant agreements; the Finance Director or designee to submit financial reports and grant claims and approve budget appropriations for the use of grant funds; the Director of Public Works or designee to submit non-financial reports.
(This item did not originate in Committee.)
Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Michael Wolfe, (805) 385-8055

7. Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Approving the Appeal and overturning the Planning Commission’s Denial of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)) for the proposed Starbucks at 2551 North Vineyard Avenue (APN: 132-0-043-215) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Find the Project to be Categorically Exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities); and

2. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Appeal and overturning the Planning Commission’s Denial of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)), subject to certain conditions and findings.

This item did not originate in Committee.

Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Vyto Adomaitis, (805) 385-7882

8. Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Channel Islands Water Quality and Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) Report.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file a report on water quality monitoring efforts in the Channel Islands Harbor.
(Public Works and Transportation Committee approved 3-0) Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Michael Wolfe, (805) 385-8055

9. Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Agreement A-8431 with Executive Facilities Services, Inc. for Custodial Services at Various City Locations.
5 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY March 15, 2022 PAGE 6
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the:

1. Mayor to execute Agreement A-8431 with Executive Facilities Services, Inc., for a term of one year with the option to extend for two consecutive periods of one year each upon the written agreement of both parties for a maximum possible contract term of three (3) years, and for a total contract not-to-exceed amount over the entire possible contract term of $735,000 to provide custodial services for the Water Campus, Blending Stations 3, 4 and 5, Wastewater Treatment Plant, Advanced Water Purification Facility (AWPF) and Del Norte Regional Recycling and Transfer Station (Del Norte); and

2. Purchasing Agent to execute amendments to extend the term of Agreement A-8431 up to a total maximum term of three (3) years.
(Public Works and Transportation Committee approved 3-0.) Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Michael Wolfe, (805) 385-8055

10. Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Agreement A-8440 with South Coast Industrial Door, Inc. for Roll-Up Door Maintenance and On-Call Repair Services Specification No. PW 22-71.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute Agreement A-8440 with South Coast Industrial Door, Inc. in the amount of $750,000 for a three year term for the Roll-Up Door Maintenance and On-Call Repair Services Specification No. PW 22-71.
(Public Works and Transportation Committee approved 3-0) Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Michael Wolfe, (805) 385-8055

11. Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Agreement A-8438 with Garcia’s Landscaping Maintenance Inc. for On-Call Landscape Vegetation and Irrigation Systems Repair and Maintenance Services Specification No.

PW 22-73.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute Agreement A-8438 with Garcia’s Landscaping Maintenance Inc. in the amount of $1,000,000 for a three year term for On-Call Landscape Vegetation and Irrigation Systems Repair and Maintenance Services Specification No. PW 22-73.
(Public Works and Transportation Committee approved 3-0.) Legislative Body: City Council
Contact: Michael Wolfe, (805) 385-8055

12. Housing Department
SUBJECT: Purchase and sale Agreement between the City of Oxnard and the Oxnard Housing Authority for the sale, in the amount of $1, of a single-family home located at 3139 J Street.

RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to execute and take all needed actions in consultation with the City Attorney relative to entering into a purchase and sale agreement, a regulatory agreement, and a declaration 6 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY March 15, 2022 PAGE 7
of restrictive covenants by and between the City of Oxnard and the Oxnard Housing Authority for the sale of residential real property located at 3139 J Street.

2. That the Board of Commissioners of the Oxnard Housing Authority adopt a resolution approving and authorizing its Executive Director or designee to execute and take all needed actions in consultation with the Authority’s General Counsel relative to entering into a purchase and sale agreement, a regulatory agreement, and a declaration of restrictive covenants by and between the City of Oxnard and the Oxnard Housing Authority for the purchase of residential real properties located at 3139 J Street.

Legislative Body: City Council and Housing Authority
Contact: Emilio Ramirez, (805) 385-8094
M. PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. Housing Department
SUBJECT: 5-Year PHA Plan, Annual Agency Plan and Capital Fund Program Five-Year Action Plan for Low Rent Public Housing. (0/10/5)
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Commissioners of the Housing Authority of the City of Oxnard (OHA):

1. Hold a public hearing to receive comments concerning the third year of the 5-Year PHA Plan, the 2022 Capital Fund Budget, and the Capital Fund Five-Year Action Plan; and

2. Adopt a resolution;
a. Approving the 2022 Annual Agency Plan, 5-Year PHA Plan for the Housing Authority; b. Authorizing and directing the Chairman to execute the Department of Housing and Urban Development Public Housing Agency Certification Compliance Form certifying the Housing Authority’s compliance with HUD’s policies and procedures; c. Authorizing the Housing Director to execute and submit all reports, documents and all other certifications required to comply with policies and procedures of the Department of Housing and Urban Development regarding the Annual Agency Plan and the 5-Year PHA Plan; d. Approving the 2022 Capital Fund Budget and Capital Fund Five-Year Action Plan; and e. Authorizing the Housing Director to accept and expend the funds as indicated in the 2022 Capital Fund Budget and Capital Fund Five-Year Action Plan.

Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/38aeZCalSGQ
Legislative Body: Housing Authority
Contact: Emilio Ramirez, (805) 385-8094

2. Community Development Department
SUBJECT: RiverPark Specific Plan Amendment & RiverPark and Fore Property Development Agreement Amendments; Located in The RiverPark Specific Plan area generally located North of the Ventura Freeway (Highway 101), west of East Vineyard Avenue, east of the Santa Clara River, and south of Central Avenue (RiverPark) and 2700 and 2750 North Ventura Road (APN 132-0-100-095 & 132-0-100-085) (Fore Property). (10/20/30) RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council:
7 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY March 15, 2022 PAGE 8

1. Conduct a public hearing, and
Take the actions identified under one of the three following options:

Option 1 – Applicants’ Original Request/Staff’s Recommended Action – Allowing residential development in Districts B, C, and D of the RiverPark Specific Plan totaling a maximum of 1,025 additional units. No Project Labor Agreement would be required by the City for future residential development in these Districts:
a. Certify an Addendum to FEIR No. 00-03; and
b. Introduce an Ordinance (by title only, waiving further reading) approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 20-630-01 (Specific Plan Amendment No. 7 to The RiverPark Specific Plan) for map and text amendments to The RiverPark Specific Plan , subject to certain findings; and
c. Introduce an Ordinance (by title only, waiving further reading) approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 20-670-04 (Sixth Amendment to Development Agreement No. A-6128) for The RiverPark Property, subject to certain findings; and d. Introduce an Ordinance (by title only, waiving further reading) approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 20-670-03 (Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. A-7113) for the Fore Property, subject to certain findings.

Option 2 – Reduced Specific Plan Amendment Alternative – Allowing residential development in Districts B and C of the RiverPark Specific Plan totaling a maximum of 613 additional units. No Project Labor Agreement would be required by the City for future residential development in these Districts:
a. Certify an Addendum to FEIR No. 00-03; and
b. Introduce an Ordinance (by title only, waiving further reading) approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 20-630-01 (Specific Plan Amendment No. 7 to The RiverPark Specific Plan) for map and text amendments to The RiverPark Specific Plan, subject to certain findings; and
c. Introduce an Ordinance (by title only, waiving further reading) approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 20-670-04 (Sixth Amendment to Development Agreement No. A-6128) for The RiverPark Property, subject to certain findings; and d. Introduce an Ordinance (by title only, waiving further reading) approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 20-670-03 (Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. A-7113) for the Fore Property, subject to certain findings.

Option 3 – Planning Commission Recommendation – Allowing residential development in Districts B and C of the RiverPark Specific Plan totaling a maximum of 613 additional 8 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL OXNARD FINANCING AUTHORITY HOUSING AUTHORITY

OXNARD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION SUCCESSOR AGENCY March 15, 2022 PAGE 9
units, subject to the Applicants first entering into Project Labor Agreements:
a. Provide direction to City staff to negotiate new language in both the Fore Property Development Agreement Planning and Zoning Permit No. 20-670-03 (Second Amendment to Development Agreement No. A-7113) and the RiverPark Development Agreement Amendment Planning and Zoning Permit No. 20-670-04 (Sixth Amendment to Development Agreement No. A-6128) that requires the Applicants to enter into Project Labor Agreements for their respective properties prior to the issuance of building permits within District B and District C, and continue the item to a date uncertain for consideration of the Development Agreement Amendments, Specific Plan Amendment, and certify an environmental document.

Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/XPUeFTl6qUo
Legislative Body: City Coucil
Contact: Vyto Adomaitis, (805) 385-7882
N. ADJOURNMENT
9 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

APPOINTMENT ITEMS (5:00 PM)
AGENDA ITEM NO. D.1
DATE: March 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Alexander Nguyen, City Manager, (805) 385-7430, [email protected] SUBJECT: Update by District Attorney Erik Nasarenko on the Family Justice Center in Oxnard.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council receive a verbal presentation from Ventura County District Attorney Erik Nasarenko on the Family Justice Center in Oxnard.

BACKGROUND
The Ventura County District Attorney’s Office is proposing a partnership between the District Attorney’s Office, City of Oxnard, County of Ventura and City of Port Hueneme to establish an Oxnard Family Justice Center (FJC). Currently the Family Justice Center (FJC) in Ventura serves roughly 2,000 crime victims per year with wraparound services under oneroof. The vast majority of these victims are Medi-Cal enrollees, Latina with two or more minor children in the home and are victims of domestic violence (73%). Nearly 23% of them are either Mixteco or mono-lingual Spanish speakers and have limited transportation options. Residents of the City of Oxnard represent the largest proportion (roughly 33%) of victims served at the Ventura FJC annually. Partnering financially with the City of Oxnard and the City of Port Hueneme, the County of Ventura will help to acquire and build out an FJC in Oxnard to help underserved victims in Oxnard and the surrounding unincorporated areas, who do not trust or voluntarily contact law enforcement, who are afraid of deportation and who face significant language, cultural, economic and transportation barriers in accessing the FJC-Ventura location. The Oxnard FJC will focus on serving the area’s Mixteco, farmworker and monolingual Spanishspeaking victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, elder abuse and both labor and sex trafficking.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports Public Safety strategy. The purpose of the Public Safety strategy is to restore and modernize the delivery of public safety services to provide for the safety of our neighborhoods and health of our community.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Luly Lopez, Executive Assistant I

ATTACHMENTS
None
10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY COUNCIL/HOUSING AUTHORITY/SUCCESSOR

AGENCY/FINANCING AUTHORITY

BUSINESS/COMMITTEE REPORTS
AGENDA ITEM NO. I.1
DATE: March 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Alexander Nguyen, City Manager, (805) 385-7430, [email protected] SUBJECT: Appointment of Voting Delegate and Alternate for Southern California Association of Governments General Assembly.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council appoint Councilwoman Gabriela Basua as the City's voting delegate to attend the 2022 Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) General Assembly scheduled for May 5 - 6, 2022 in Palm Desert, California and appoint an alternate delegate.

BACKGROUND
SCAG is a Joint Powers Authority under California state law, established as an association of local governments and agencies in six counties (Imperial, Los Angles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino and Ventura) and 191 cities that voluntarily convene as a forum to address regional issues. SCAG develops long-range regional transportation plans, regional housing needs allocation, and a portion of the South Coast Air Quality management plans, providing broadbased representation of Southern California's cities and counties.

With its expanded membership structure, SCAG created regional districts to provide for more diverse representation with the intent to serve equal populations and communities of interest. Currently, the Regional Council consists of 86 members. Councilmember Laura D. Hernandez from the City of Port Hueneme was recently elected by the Ventura Council of Governments (VCOG) and is serving as the Regional Councilmember representing District 45 (cities of Oxnard, Camarillo and Port Hueneme).

In addition, each member city appoints its own delegate and alternate representative to vote on the City's behalf at the SCAG Annual General Assembly, scheduled for May 5, 2022. All proposed resolutions and/or bylaw revisions will first be reviewed by the SCAG Bylaws and Resolutions Committee and the Regional Council before being available for consideration at this General Assembly meeting scheduled for May 5, 2022.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item is a routine operational item or does not relate to the five strategic priorities adopted by City Council on March 16, 2021.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The estimated cost to attend this conference is $250.00. There are sufficient funds to cover this in account number 101- 1101-801-8343 budgeted in FY 22-23.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
11 This item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Luly Lopez, Executive Assistant I

ATTACHMENTS
None
12 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.1
DATE: March 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Rose Chaparro, City Clerk, (805) 385-7805, [email protected] SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve the minutes of the February 9, 2022 special meeting, the February 15, 2022 regular meeting, and the February 16, 2022 special meeting as presented.

BACKGROUND
Approval of Minutes.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item is a routine operational item or does not relate to the five strategic priorities adopted by City Council on March 16, 2021.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Rose Chaparro, City Clerk

ATTACHMENTS

1. MINUTES 02 09 2022 CC Special Meeting

2. MINUTES 02 15 2022 CC Regular Meeting

3. MINUTES 02 16 2022 CC Special Meeting
13 MINUTES

OXNARD CITY COUNCIL
Special Council Meeting
February 9, 2022
A. ROLL CALL, POSTING OF AGENDA
At 6:15 p.m., Mayor John C. Zaragoza called to order the special meeting of the Oxnard City Council, in the City Hall Council Chambers at 305 W. Third Street, Oxnard, California. The City Clerk called the roll and announced the posting of the agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Bryan A. MacDonald and Councilmembers Gabriela Basua, Vianey Lopez, Oscar Madrigal, Bert E. Perello, and Gabriel (Gabe) Teran were present via videoconference. Mayor Zaragoza was present in person.

Staff members present in person were Alexander Nguyen, City Manager; Ashley Golden, Assistant City Manager; Ken Rozell, Chief Assistant City Attorney; Jason Zaragoza, Deputy City Attorney; and Rose Chaparro, City Clerk.

Staff member Shiri Klima, Deputy City Manager; participated via videoconference.

Lauren Langer and Greg Kettles, Special Counsel with Best Best & Krieger LLP also participated via videoconference.

THE FOLLOWING LEGISLATIVE BODIES ARE MEETING: City Council B. OPENING CEREMONIES (6:00 PM)
The flag salute was followed by a moment of silence.

C. REPORTS

1. Housing Department
SUBJECT: Review of Rent Stabilization and Just Cause Eviction and Tenant Protection Draft Ordinances. (10/30/60)
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the Rent Stabilization and Just Cause Eviction and Tenant Protection draft ordinances, and provide direction to staff regarding any desired modifications to said ordinances, which will be brought back at a future meeting.

Ken Rozell, Chief Assistant City Attorney, gave a report and answered questions from Council. Lauren Langer and Greg Kettles, Special Counsel with Best Best & Krieger LLP, were also available to answer questions. Discussion ensued among the Council and staff.

Public comments were received from Maria Navarro, Zuleth Lucero, Lucila Cruz, Danielle Leidner-Peretz, Teresa, Cecilia, Arturo, Soledad, Petra, Leticia Mendoza, Leticia Perez, Amalia R., Adriana, Moises, Hugo, Enedina, Marisol, Maria Santiago, Laura, Samuel, Virgida, Carmen, Claudia Martinez, Fidel Pafilo, Yasmine Alvarado, Josefino Cervantes, Eulalia Mendoza, Johana Mendez, Jorge Toledano, Claudia Quezada, Matthew Buck, Reyna, Juanito, Beatriz Arreguin, Anastacio, Felix Vasquez, Ilse Cordova, Brijida Zarate, Teresa Alvarez, Breatriz Basurto, Josue Vasquez, Ervino Mateo, Patricia Friou, Janet Sprissler, Matt Capritto, Reyna,, Josue Vasquez, Odette Moran, Max Ghenis, Maria Mendez, Victoria Ornsbey, Elidet Bordon, Ashley Anderson, Margarita Mateo, Raymunda Morales, Sher Heard, Lorenzo Castillo, Gary Rainwater, Refuji Ortiz Salazar, Rosi, Guillermo, Marisol, Maria, Daniel Mora, Daniel Mora, Tim Theys, Ezequiel Alonso, Israel 14 Gracida Sanchez, Maria Cervantes, Mark Linnett, Marta Brown, S. Vega, Ellis San Jose, Arianna Velasco, Joey Yohan, Barbara Macri-Ortiz, Jennifer Hernandez, Richard Aus, Raymunda, Tony, Lorenzo Castillo, and Jerry R. Written communications were received and forwarded to Council.

At 9:59 p.m. City Council voted to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m., and take action on the remainder of the items on the agenda.

It was moved by Councilmember Perello, seconded by Councilmember Teran, to approve continuing the meeting past 10:00 p.m. VOTE: Basua, Madrigal, MacDonald, Teran, Lopez, Perello, and Zaragoza voted favor; the motion carried 7-0.

Council provided staff direction regarding modification to the Ordinances which will be brought back to Council at a future date. Report was received and filed, no formal action was required.

D. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business on the agenda, and without objection, Mayor Zaragoza adjourned the meeting at 11:53 p.m.

ROSE CHAPARRO JOHN C. ZARAGOZA
City Clerk Mayor
15 MINUTES

OXNARD CITY COUNCIL
Regular Meeting
February 15, 2022
A. ROLL CALL, POSTING OF AGENDA
At 4:31 p.m., Mayor John C. Zaragoza called to order the regular meeting of the Oxnard City Council, in the City Hall Council Chambers at 305 W. Third Street, Oxnard, California. The City Clerk called the roll and announced the posting of the agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Bryan A. MacDonald and Councilmembers Gabriela Basua, Vianey Lopez, Oscar Madrigal, Bert E. Perello, and Gabriel (Gabe) Teran were present via videoconference. Mayor Zaragoza was present in person.

Staff members present in person were Alexander Nguyen, City Manager; Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney; Terrel Harrison, Cultural & Community Services Director; and Rose Chaparro, City Clerk.

Staff members Ashley Golden, Assistant City Manager; Shiri Klima, Deputy City Manager; Jason Benites, Police Chief; Alexander Hamilton, Fire Chief; Jaime Villa , EMS Coordinator; Michael Wolfe, Public Works Director; Steve Howlett, Assistant Public Works Director; Tatiana Arnaout, Senior Civil Engineer; Jan Hauser, Wastewater Division Manager; Emilio Ramirez, Housing Director; Elsa Brown, Affordable Housing Manager; Vyto Adomaitis, Community Development Director; Scott Kolwitz, Planning & Environmental Services Manager; Joe Pearson II, AICP, Senior Planner; Jose Coyotl, Associate Planner; Kumar Neppalli, Traffic Operations; Betsy George, Chief Financial Officer; Helen Miller, IT Director; Eden Alomeri, Revenue & Licensing Director & Assistant City Treasurer; participated via videoconference.

Dr. Thomas Duncan, Trauma Center Director; Mike Powers, County Executive Officer; Dr. John Fankhauser, CEO; Steve Carroll, EMS Administrator; Barry Zimmerman, Director of Ventura; Mary L.

Maxion, Sr. Manager; Tony Hall, Founder & CEO; Cindy Maurer; Hollee King Winegar, Land Use Planning Consultant with Sites Pacific Planning; Matt Friedrich, Property Owner; Beverly Metz, Project Manager; Anthony Valdez, Regional Manager; Christine Fong, Project Architect; Jesus Torres, CEO & Public Affairs with LEAD Public Strategies; Doug Gans, Chief Operating Officer; Dave Dallal, Chief Financial Officer; Ruthie Edelson, Community Relations; Randy Latimer, Security Consultant; Alfred Fraijo, Jr.; Land Use Counsel; Kristi Byers, Architect; Mark Irving, Developer Representative; Robert Murphy, Walter Hagedohm, and Cindy Maurer, Members of Common Sense; and Scott Swenson, Safer Neighborhood; also participated via videoconference.

THE FOLLOWING LEGISLATIVE BODIES ARE MEETING: City Council B. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS (None received.) C. CLOSED SESSION (4:30 PM)

1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION (Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1))
Name of case: Ventura County Fire Protection District; et al. v. Santa Clara Waste Water Company; et al.

Ventura County Superior Court, Case No. 56-2016-00484523-CU-PO-VTA Legislative Body: City Council

2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Government Code section 54957.6) Agency designated representatives: Alex Nguyen, City Manager, Steve Naveau, Director of 16 FEBRUARY 15, 2022 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2
Human Resources; and Jennie Kelly, Assistant City Attorney.

Legislative Body: City Council
At 4:36 p.m., the City Council recessed to a closed session. At 5:06 p.m., the City Council reconvened in open session in the Council Chambers. The City Attorney announced that there were no reportable actions out of closed session.

D. APPOINTMENT ITEMS

1. City Manager Department
SUBJECT: Update on Trauma Center Hospital Designation.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive a verbal presentation from Ventura County Medical Center / Santa Paula Hospital, CEO Dr. John Fankhauser and Trauma Director, Dr.

Thomas Duncan, on Trauma Center Hospital Designation.

Mr. Mike Powers, County Executive Officer, introduced Dr. John Fankhauser, CEO for the Ventura County Medical Center; and Dr. Thomas Duncan, VCMC Trauma Center Director. They presented and provided Council an update on the Trauma Center hospital designation. Discussion ensued among the Council and staff. Report was received and filed, no formal action was required.

E. OPENING CEREMONIES
The flag salute was followed by a moment of silence.

F. CEREMONIAL ITEMS

1. Cultural & Community Services Department
SUBJECT: Presentation of Resolution #15,538 Commending Debbie Estrada for over 20 Years of Service to the City of Oxnard.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt Resolution #15,538 commending Debbie Estrada for over Twenty Years of Service to the City of Oxnard's Recreation Division of the Cultural and Community Services Department.

Mayor Zaragoza read the resolution and presented it to Debbie Estrada, who retired after working in the Recreation Division of the Cultural and Community Services Department for over 20 years. Terrel Harrison, Cultural & Community Services Director, acknowledged and thanked Debbie for her years of service to the City of Oxnard. Debbie also made a few remarks. 17 FEBRUARY 15, 2022 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL PAGE 3
It was moved by Councilmember Perello, seconded by Councilmember Teran, to approve Resolution #15,538 as presented. VOTE: Lopez, MacDonald, Madrigal, Perello, Teran, Zaragoza, and Basua voted in favor; the motion carried 7-0.

G. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
Public comments were received from Chris Plasencia (Inquired about Youth Gang Prevention Programs), Audrey Keller (Community Clean-up Event), Diana Velzy, Orchard Park Neighborhood Council (Requesting support for Neighborhood Council events), Chuck Carter (Channel Islands Harbor Water Quality), Armando Delgado (Recognized and Congratulated Debbie Estrada on her retirement on behalf of the Carpenters Local 805), and Douglas Partello, Cabrillo Neighborhood Council Chair (new plan for the neighborhood cleanup vs. volunteer events); Jack Villa (Concerns about the new Neighborhood Clean-up Plan).

H. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER

1. City Manager Department
SUBJECT: COVID-19 Update from Director of Emergency Services. (10/5/5) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Receive and file an update from the Director of Emergency Services on the COVID19 Local Emergency.

Alexander Nguyen, City Manager, presented and answered questions from Council. No public comments were received. Report was received and filed. No formal action was required.

I. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Councilmember Teran selected Jump ‘n Jammin, as his recommendation for a local business. He announced that he attended the Fremont North Neighborhood Council meeting at the request of their Chair. He thanked the neighborhood residents for participating and attending the meeting. He plans to attend the next Carriage Square Neighborhood Council meeting as well. He thanked Mr. Marvin Boos and all the volunteers for their work during the clean-up event on Patterson Road. He asked for a future agenda item, he received a number of complaints from residents about the street car racing and excessive exhaust noise from vehicles, and asked that the Police Department provide Council an update on these items. He also asked for an update on the curb cut permits and how the parking issues are being addressed.

Councilmember Basua selected Los Remedios Steak House as her recommendation for a local business. She also requested that the curb cut item be brought back to Council at a future meeting.

Mayor Pro Tem MacDonald selected the Downtown Café Restaurant as his recommendation for a local business. He also announced that he has been selected as the new Vice Chair for the Ventura County Transportation Commission for this year and is hopeful to be the new Commission Chair next year.

Councilmember Perello selected Flowers by Paulann as his recommendation for a local business. He also discussed the local neighborhood clean-ups that are happening throughout the City. He acknowledged and thanked the Neighborhood Councils, the many different groups throughout the 18 FEBRUARY 15, 2022 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL PAGE 4
community, and the volunteers that are doing a great job at the events being held throughout the City.

He thanked Mr. Marvin Boos, Casa De Vida organization, and all the volunteers for their work during the clean-up event on Patterson Road.

Councilmember Lopez selected 4 Way Meat Market located near the Oxnard Transportation Center, as her recommendation for a local business. She thanked the City Manager for working on organizing programming for youth in the City of Oxnard.

Councilmember Madrigal selected A Burger as his recommendation for a local business. He reminded the residents and parents of the Little League participants to support the children that enjoy the sport and to keep the environment respectful and positive for all involved.

Mayor Zaragoza also thanked Mr. Marvin Boos, members of the community, numerous volunteers and City employees for all the work and clean-up events happening throughout the City.

J. REVIEW OF INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
Items L-1 through L-4 were discussed among the Council and staff.

K. PUBLIC COMMENTS ON INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA (None received.) L. INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA

1. City Clerk Department
SUBJECT: Approval of Minutes.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the minutes of the January 18, 2022 regular meeting and the January 22, 2022 special meeting as presented.

2. Information Technology Department
SUBJECT: Insight Public Sector Inc.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute a blanket purchase order for an amount not to exceed $770,000 with Insight Public Sector, Inc. over a two-year period for information technology infrastructure. (Finance and Governance Committee approved 3-0.)

3. Public Works Department
SUBJECT: Agreement A-8428 with Blackpointe Group Construction & Management Inc., for Catch Basin Cleaning Services.

RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute Agreement A-8428 with Blackpointe Group Construction & Management Inc. (Blackpointe), in the amount not to exceed $900,000 for a three-year term ending February 15, 2025, for catch basin cleaning services. (Public Works and Transportation Committee approved 3-0.)

4. Fire Department
SUBJECT: SAFER Grant Application - no match required.

RECOMMENDATION: That City Council adopt Resolution #15,539:
19 FEBRUARY 15, 2022 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL PAGE 5

1. Ratifying the submission of a grant application for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) FY2021 Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant in the amount of $2,192,342 to be used for the hiring of six additional firefighters, no local match is required;

2. That authorizes the City Manager or designee to execute the grant agreement if grant funds are awarded to the City;

3. That authorizes the Chief Financial Officer or designee to submit financial reports and grant claims, approve budget appropriations during FY2022-2023 for the use of grant funds and perform all other required financial actions; and

4. That authorizes the Fire Chief or designee to submit non-financial reports.

It was moved by Councilmember Perello, seconded by Councilmember Lopez, to approve the Information/Consent items as presented. VOTE: MacDonald, Perello, Basua, Madrigal, Zaragoza, Teran, and Lopez voted in favor; motion passed 7-0.

M. PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. Community Development Department
SUBJECT: TD Enterprise LLC dba Oxnard Holistics - Commercial Cannabis Business Retail Special Use Permit (SUP). (10/15/15)
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing:

2. Find the Project to be Categorically Exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities), and

3. Adopt Resolution #15,540 Approving the Appeal and overturning the Planning Commission’s Denial of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-516-24 (Special Use Permit- Cannabis Retail), subject to certain conditions and findings. (This item did not originate in Committee.) The City Clerk announced the affidavit of publication and stated that written communications were received and forwarded to Council.

The City Council members disclosed and reported on the ex parte communications that they received.

Each councilmember provided a summary of the ex parte communications received.

Scott Kolwitz, Planning & Environmental Services Manager; Jose Coyotl, Associate Planner; Scott Swenson, Safer Neighborhoods and Alcohol Compliance Specialist; Kumar Neppalli, Traffic Engineer; and Ken Rozell, Chief Assistant City Attorney; gave a report and answered questions.

Mayor Zaragoza opened the public testimony portion of the public hearing. Representatives of the Appellant/Applicant (Alfred Fraijo, Land Use Counsel; Doug Gans, Chief Operating Officer; Kristi Byers, Architect; Dave Dallal, Chief Financial Officer; and Randy Latimer, Security Consultant) made a presentation.

Robert Murphy, Walter Hagedohm, and Cindy Maurer, Representatives of an unincorporated association named “Common Sense” gave a presentation.
20 FEBRUARY 15, 2022 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL PAGE 6
Public comments were received from Audrey Keller, Michael Smith, Holly Hayes-Rey, Cesar Hernandez, Jose Barrera, Anthony Mireles, Daniel Nicholas, Bob Launius, Chris Hernandez, Josh Garretson, Forrest Forbes, Francine Castanon, Sarah Peterson, Jenna Lieberman, Tom Cady, Joe Peterson, Cleland (Lee) Hoff, Yvonne De La Rosa Green, Deirdre Frank, Jason Stover, Nancy Lindhom, Ed Gutierrez, Kara Hanley, Julie Pena, Alexandra Porter, Kenneth Clark, Shane Kimbrough, Mike Marlow, Tony Lanzara, David Johnston, David Bejarano, Mark Caviezel, Kathy Guerrero, John Loftus, Mayra Delgado, Clifford M. Maurer, Chief Al Davis, Rob Fallon, Dr. Beth Shillito, Diane Delaney, Arthur Reyna, Rachel Torres, Herb Summers, Leslie Kiefner, Manuel Herrera, Daniel Chavez, Maria Navarro, and Armando Delgado.

Without objection, the Council approved closing the public testimony portion of the public hearing.

Discussion ensued among the Council and staff.

It was moved by Councilmember Basua, seconded by Councilmember Lopez, to approve the recommended action. VOTE: Teran, Basua, Zaragoza, Lopez, MacDonald, and Madrigal voted in favor; Perello voted against, the motion carried 6-1.

At 9:58 p.m. City Council voted to continue the meeting past 10:00 p.m., and take action on the remainder of the items on the agenda.

It was moved by Councilmember Teran, seconded by Councilmember Lopez, to approve the recommended action as presented. VOTE: Perello, Teran, Zaragoza, Basua, Lopez, MacDonald, and Madrigal voted in favor; the motion carried 7-0.

2. Community Development Department
SUBJECT: Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations Appeal. (10/15/15) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing:

2. Find the Project to be Statutorily Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270 (“Projects Which are Disapproved”); and

3. Adopt a resolution denying the Appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s Denial of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)), because the record does not contain the evidence necessary to make all of the Findings required by Oxnard City Code Section 16-531 in order to grant a Special Use Permit. (This item did not originate in Committee.)
The City Clerk announced the affidavit of publication and stated that written communications were received and forwarded to Council.

The City Council members disclosed and reported on the ex parte communications that they received.

Each councilmember provided a summary of the ex parte communications received.

Scott Kolwitz, Planning & Environmental Services Manager; Ken Rozell, Chief Assistant City Attorney; and Joe Pearson II, AICP, Senior Planner; gave a report and answered questions. 21 FEBRUARY 15, 2022 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL PAGE 7
Mayor Zaragoza opened the public testimony portion of the public hearing. The Appellant (Friedrich Family Limited Partnership, Matt Friedrich, Property Owner; Anthony Valdez, Regional Manager for Starbucks; Hollee King Winegar, Planning Consultant; Christine Fong, Project Architect; and Beverly Metz, Project Manager for Starbucks) provided a presentation.

Public comments were received from Jewel Harris and Jessica Otani.

Without objection, the Council approved closing the public testimony portion of the public hearing.

Discussion ensued among the Council and staff.

Mayor Pro Tem MacDonald made a motion of intent to approve the Appeal and approve the project, and requested that staff prepare a resolution and bring it back to the March 15, 2022 Council meeting.

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem MacDonald, seconded by Councilmember Teran, to approve the motion of intent. VOTE: Basua, Madrigal, MacDonald, Teran, Lopez, Perello, and Zaragoza voted in favor; the motion carried 7-0.

N. REPORTS

1. Finance Department
SUBJECT: FY 20-21 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report and Summary Presentation. (15/15/10)
RECOMMENDATION: That City Council receive the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and summary presentation from the City's external financial auditors, Eadie + Payne, LLP.
(Finance and Governance Committee approved 2-0)
(Presentation will be live upon consultant's request).

This item was pulled from this meeting’s agenda and will be brought back to Council at a future date.

2. City Manager Department
SUBJECT: Update on Status and Accomplishments of Current Measure O Projects and Opening the Conversation regarding the Weaning Schedule. (0/10/10) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:

1. Receive and file the annual update; and

2. Open the conversation regarding the Measure O weaning schedule This item was pulled from this meeting’s agenda and will be brought back to Council at a future date.

3. Cultural & Community Services Department
SUBJECT: Amendment to an Agreement with the Oxnard School District (A-8318) for the Operations of the After School Education and Safety Grant (ASES) to increase the total value of the agreement by $5,030,000 bringing the total agreement amount to $2,950,000 in year one (FY 2021-2022) and $4,830,000 in year two (FY 2022-2023). (0/10/5) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute an amendment to the agreement (A-8318) with the Oxnard School District (OSD) for the 22 FEBRUARY 15, 2022 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL PAGE 8
operations of the Oxnard After School Education and Safety (ASES) Grant to:
(1) Increase the agreement amount by $5,030,000 resulting in a total agreement amount of $7,780,000, not to exceed $2,950,000 in year one (FY2021-2022) and $4,830,000 in year two (FY2022-2023) with an additional City match of $130,000 of in-kind services per fiscal year, (2) Extend the expiration date for one year to June 30, 2023; and (3) Approve a budget appropriation recognizing $200,000 of additional FY21-22 Fund 272 (21st Century CLCP-ASESP) grant funding.

Terrel Harrison, Cultural & Community Services Director, presented and answered questions. No public comments were received. Discussion ensued among the Council and staff.

It was moved by Mayor Zaragoza, seconded by Councilmember Basua, to approve the recommended action as presented. VOTE: Zaragoza, Basua, Lopez, MacDonald, Madrigal, Perello, and Teran voted in favor, motion passed 7-0.

4. Housing Department
SUBJECT: Impact Fee Loan Agreement Amendment Las Cortes Phase III. (0/5/5) RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute a First Amendment to the Loan Agreement with A0592 Oxnard, L.P., a California limited partnership (Agreement No. A-8226), for an increase in deferred impact fees related to the development of the Las Cortes Phase III affordable housing project.

Emilio Ramirez, Housing Director, presented and answered questions. No public comments were received.

Discussion ensued among the Council and staff.

It was moved by Councilmember Basua, seconded by Councilmember Teran, to approve the recommended action as presented. VOTE: Perello, Teran, Zaragoza, Basua, Lopez, MacDonald, and Madrigal voted in favor, motion passed 7-0.

O. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business on the agenda, and without objection, Mayor Zaragoza adjourned the meeting at 12:57 a.m.

ROSE CHAPARRO JOHN C. ZARAGOZA
City Clerk Mayor
23 MINUTES

OXNARD CITY COUNCIL
Special Council Meeting
February 16, 2022
A. ROLL CALL, POSTING OF AGENDA
At 6:01 p.m., Mayor John C. Zaragoza called to order the special meeting of the Oxnard City Council, in the City Hall Council Chambers at 305 W. Third Street, Oxnard, California. The City Clerk called the roll and announced the posting of the agenda. Mayor Pro Tem Bryan A. MacDonald and Councilmembers Gabriela Basua, Vianey Lopez, Oscar Madrigal, Bert E. Perello, and Gabriel (Gabe) Teran were present via videoconference. Mayor Zaragoza was present in person.

Staff members present in person were Alexander Nguyen, City Manager; Ken Rozell, Chief Assistant City Attorney; Jason Zaragoza, Deputy City Attorney; and Rose Chaparro, City Clerk.

Staff members that participated via videoconference were Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney; and Shiri Klima, Deputy City Manager.

Kristen Parks, Consultant with National Demographics Corporation also participated via videoconference.

THE FOLLOWING LEGISLATIVE BODIES ARE MEETING: City Council B. OPENING CEREMONIES (6:00 PM)
The flag salute was followed by a moment of silence.

C. PUBLIC HEARINGS

1. City Attorney Department
SUBJECT: Public Hearing Regarding Redistricting of City Council Districts (15/30/30) RECOMMENDATION:

1. That the City Council conduct a public hearing regarding the redistricting process for City Council districts, including taking public testimony regarding the six maps that the City Council selected to move forward for further consideration (NDC Maps 201, 203 and 203A and Public Maps 4, 6 and 7) and the three maps that were submitted prior to the February 7, 2022 deadline for map submittal (Public Maps 9, 10 and 11).

2. That the City Council approve a motion to select one of the proposed District maps and direct that the matter be brought back to the City Council on March 1, 2022 for the introduction of the ordinance to adopt the District map by amending Appendix A to Oxnard City Code Section 2-4.

Because the presentation will be made by a consultant, the presentation was not prerecorded pursuant to Measure M.

The City Clerk announced the affidavit of publication. A written communication letter was received from Maricela Morales, Executive Director, Central Coast-Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy (CAUSE), which was provided to Council for consideration.
24 FEBRUARY 16, 2022 OXNARD CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2
Kenneth Rozell, Chief Assistant City Attorney, introduced Kristen Parks, Consultant with National Demographics Corporation, who presented and answered questions.

Mayor Zaragoza opened the public testimony portion of the public hearing. Public comments were received from Maria Navarro and Deirdre Frank.

Without objection, the Council approved closing the public testimony portion of the public hearing. Discussion ensued among the Council and staff.

Mayor Pro Tem MacDonald made a motion to select NDC Map 203A and direct that the matter be brought back to the City Council on March 1, 2022 for the introduction of an ordinance.

It was moved by Mayor Pro Tem MacDonald, seconded by Councilmember Teran, to approve the recommended action. VOTE: Lopez, MacDonald, Perello, Teran, and Zaragoza voted in favor; Madrigal and Basua voted against; the motion carried 5-2.

D. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business on the agenda, and without objection, Mayor Zaragoza adjourned the meeting at 7:14 p.m.

ROSE CHAPARRO JOHN C. ZARAGOZA
City Clerk Mayor
25 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.2
DATE: March 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Stephen Fischer, City Attorney, (805) 385-7483, [email protected] SUBJECT: Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Oxnard City Code Section 2-2.5.Regarding the Boundaries and Identifying Number of Each City Council District.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt an Ordinance that amends Oxnard City Code Section 2-2.5 regarding the boundaries and identifying number of each City Council district.

BACKGROUND
Every ten years, cities with by-district elections are required to use new census data to review and redraw district lines to reflect population changes. This process, called redistricting, ensures that all districts within a city have nearly an equal number of people residing within each district.

While state law only requires that the City hold four public hearings or workshops on the redistricting process, the City Council held a total of seven public hearings on the redistricting process. These public hearings were held on July 29, 2021, September 30, 2021, December 6, 2021, January 6, 2022, January 22, 2022, February 1, 2022 and February 16, 2022.

At the end of the February 16, 2022 meeting, the City Council voted 5 to 2 to select NDC Map 203A as the map that the Council wished to be brought back at the March 1, 2022 City Council meeting. Based upon the City Council’s direction, City staff drafted for City Council consideration an ordinance that amended Oxnard City Code Section 2-2.5. so that the boundaries and identifying number of each City Council district are modified to be consistent with NDC Map 203A.

At the meeting of March 1, 2022, by a 6-1 vote, the City Council approved the first reading of the ordinance by title only and waived further reading of the ordinance.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item does not relate to the five strategic priorities adopted by City Council on March 16, 2021.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Kenneth Rozell, Chief Assistant City Attorney, Jason Zaragoza, Deputy City Attorney 26 ATTACHMENTS

1. Ordinance Designating City Council Districts
27 ORDINANCE NO. _________

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OXNARD AMENDING OXNARD CITY CODE SECTION 2-2.5

REGARDING CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND AMENDING THE

BOUNDARIES AND IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS OF THE DISTRICTS

AS INDICATED IN APPENDIX A
WHEREAS, every ten years, cities with by-district elections are required to use new census data to review and redraw district lines to reflect population changes; and WHEREAS, this redistricting process ensures that all districts within a city have nearly an equal number of people residing within each district; and WHEREAS, although the City recently went through the districting process in 2018, the Council districts that were created reflected the population totals from the 2010 census; and WHEREAS, under state law, public entities with elections in November 2022 have until April 17, 2022 in which to adopt district maps that reflect the changes in population indicated in the 2020 census (as modified by the State of California to reflect the original residency of persons incarcerated in California’s prisons); and
WHEREAS, although state law only requires that the City hold four public hearings or workshops, the City Council held a total of seven public hearings regarding redistricting on July 29, 2021, September 30, 2021, December 6, 2021, January 6, 2022, January 22, 2022, February 1, 2022 and February 16, 2022; and
WHEREAS, during this redistricting process, members of the public submitted a total of 11 maps for the City Council’s consideration (Public Maps 1 through 11) and the City’s demographer also prepared four maps for the City Council’s consideration (NDC Maps 201, 202, 203 and 203A); and
WHEREAS, after duly considering all of the maps submitted by members of the public and the City’s demographer, and considering all written and verbal public testimony, the City Council has determined that it wishes to adopt NDC Map 203A; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and declares that NDC Map 203A meets all the requirements of state law including, but limited to, that the modified Council Districts:

A, Are substantially equal in population;
B. Comply with the U.S. Constitution, the California Constitution and the federal Voting Rights Act;
C. Are geographically contiguous;
D. Minimize the division of local neighborhoods and local communities of interest; 28 -2-
E. Create district boundaries that residents can easily identify and understand; F. Are compact in size; and
G. Are not adopted to favor or discriminate against a political party.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Code Amendment. Section 2-2.5 of the Oxnard City Code is amended to read as follows:
“2-2.5 City Council Districts Established. Six City Council districts are hereby established in the City of Oxnard. The boundaries and identifying number of each district shall be as described on NDC Map 203A codified as Appendix A and incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect. The Council of the City of Oxnard hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions of this Ordinance be declared invalid or unenforceable.

Section 3. Within fifteen days after passage, the City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published one time in a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City. Ordinance No. _______ was introduced on March 1, 2022, and finally adopted on March 15, 2022 to become effective thirty days thereafter.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
John Zaragoza, Mayor
29 -3-
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________
Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney
30 -4-
Appendix A
31 32

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.3
DATE: March 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Betsy George, Chief Financial Officer, 805-200-5400, [email protected] SUBJECT: Resolution Declaring the Intent of the City to be Reimbursed for Certain Capital Expenditures from the Proceeds of Indebtedness

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt a resolution declaring the intent of the City to be reimbursed for certain capital expenditures from the proceeds of indebtedness.
(Finance and Governance Committee approved 3-0)

BACKGROUND
City Council authorized the purchase of three fire engines at the City Council meeting on January 18, 2022. The total approved purchase order amount was $2,603,358.21. In addition to the purchase cost of the vehicles, there is expected to be additional upfitting costs (estimated at $165,000 per vehicle). City staff purchased the vehicles the week of January 24th to avoid a 7% cost increase that would have taken effect on February 1, 2022. This saved the City $172,042.

City staff expect to utilize the outstanding Master Equipment Lease Purchase Agreement (“Master Lease”) with Banc of America to reimburse the City for the cost of the vehicles and the upfitting costs. The City has approximately $4.5 million remaining in the existing line of credit and expects to draw a total of $3.3 million to cover the purchase and upfitting of the fire trucks.

In order for the reimbursement to be compliant with the requirements of tax-exempt financings, the City is required to adopt a resolution declaring its intention to reimburse the City out of tax-exempt line of credit proceeds. This must be adopted within 60 days of when the vehicles were purchased. Adopting this resolution preserves the option for the City to be reimbursed from draws on the line of credit for the amounts already paid for the vehicles.

While adopting the reimbursement resolution demonstrates the City’s intent to borrow funds, it does not obligate the City to borrow the funds. Staff will bring an agenda item to the Committee and Council at a later date considering the approval of the financing.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
This reimbursement resolution is not expected to have any direct financial impact on the City. The decision to enter into financing for the purchase of the fire vehicles will be made on a separate date. The cost of the fire vehicles is included in the Fire Department's 2021-22 budget appropriation.
33 COMMITTEE OUTCOME
The Finance and Governance Committee approved 3-0 on February 22, 2022, to approve the staff recommendation and to forward the item for Council approval.

Prepared by: NHA Advisors

ATTACHMENTS

1. Oxnard Reimbursement Resolution (Fire Vehicles) 220202 (FINAL).v2 34 RESOLUTION NO. _____
_

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF OXNARD DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE CITY TO BE

REIMBURSED FOR CERTAIN CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS

OF INDEBTEDNESS
WHEREAS, the City of Oxnard (the “City”) intends to acquire emergency fire equipment and vehicles to be used to perform its essential governmental functions (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the City will pay certain Capital Expenditures in connection with the Project (the "Expenditures") prior to the issuance of one or more series of tax-exempt obligations in the expected approximate principal amount of $3.3 million (the "Indebtedness") for the purpose of financing costs associated with the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City reasonably expects that certain of the proceeds of the Indebtedness will be used to reimburse the City for the Expenditures; and
WHEREAS, Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations requires the City to declare its reasonable official intent to be reimbursed for prior Capital Expenditures made for the Project with proceeds of a subsequent borrowing.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD AS FOLLOWS:

1. The City finds and determines that the foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. This declaration is made solely for purpose of establishing compliance with the requirements of Section 1.150-2 of the Treasury Regulations, and does not bind the City to make any expenditure, incur any indebtedness, or proceed with the Project.

3. The City declares its official intent to use proceeds of the Indebtedness to reimburse itself for Expenditures made on or after the date which is no more than 60 days prior to the date of adoption of this Resolution.

4. The City will make a reimbursement allocation, which is a written allocation by the City that evidences the City's use of proceeds of the Indebtedness to reimburse itself for an Expenditure, no later than eighteen (18) months after the later of the date on which the expenditure is paid or the Project is placed in service or abandoned, but in no event more than three years after the date on which the Expenditure is paid.

5. The City recognizes that exceptions are also available under the Treasury Regulations for certain "preliminary expenditures," costs of issuance, certain de minimis amounts, expenditures by "small issuers" (based on the year of issuance and not the year of expenditure) and expenditures for construction projects of at least five (5) years.
35 6. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption by this City Council.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

John C. Zaragoza
Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________
Rose Chaparro
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________________
Stephen M. Fischer
City Attorney
36 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.4
DATE: March 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Michael Wolfe, Public Works Director, (805) 385-8055, [email protected] SUBJECT: Third Amendment to Agreement A-8243 with Northern Digital, Inc. for Water System SCADA Design Project PW 20-97

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve and authorize the Mayor to execute a Third Amendment to Agreement A-8243 with Northern Digital, Inc. in the amount of $78,500 for a new not to exceed contract amount of $344,700 for additional design work required for the Water System Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Design Project PW 20-97 (Project No. 206509).
(This item did not originate in Committee as this is a capital improvement project specifically listed in the Capital Improvement Program budget, which was previously approved by the City Council.)

BACKGROUND
On March 2, 2021, the City Council approved Agreement A-8243 with Northern Digital, Inc. (NDI), in the amount of $266,200, for design services for the Water System Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Project. The initial scope of work included:
 Develop a clear and concise preliminary design report (PDR) outlining an efficient long-term solution for the SCADA system.
 Develop full process diagrams including input/output schedule and alarm set points.  Provide a design that incorporates a cyber-security plan including anti-virus software, firewalls, types of connection, and remote access.
 Provide guidelines for system redundancy, including data backup schedules, data mining capabilities, and a list of spare parts and equipment to be kept onsite.
 Develop a complete set of design drawings, specifications, and bid documents. Provide a bid item list with a cost estimate to be used for budgetary purposes by the City.

Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Reference:

Project No. 206509 - Water System SCADA Design Project - CIP 2021-2026 - Adopted May 18, 2021 – Pages 181.

DISCUSSION
As part of the original scope of work, NDI developed a PDR that included an assessment of existing equipment, cyber security, control logic, and software/equipment options. Two workshops were held with the Water Division, Public Works Engineering, and NDI. Through the PDR process additional design parameters were identified as follows:
37  Replacement and relocation of existing programmable logic controllers  SCADA specific server room
 Evaluation of existing communications (fiber & radio) system including wiring, routing, power and signaling associated with the existing communications infrastructure to address actions from PDR including redundancy  Modify existing network design and preliminary plans to allow the Operations/Engineering team to control, manage and secure the SCADA system, requiring additional network design, security requirements and firewalls  Additional construction phase support, include system integration NDI provided a proposal for the additional work required to provide the additional scope noted above. The proposal was reviewed by the City Engineer and the Supervising Civil Engineer.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports the Infrastructure and Natural Resources strategy. The purpose of the Infrastructure and Natural Resources strategy is to preserve and improve our roads, utilities, parks, trees, water supply and natural resources through effective planning, prioritization, and an equitable and efficient use of available funding.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The total amount of this Third Amendment to Agreement A-8243 with Northern Digital, Inc. shall not exceed $78,500 with a new not to exceed contract amount of $344,700 for professional design services. The Water System SCADA Design Project No. 206509 has an available project budget of approximately $920,000 from the Water Operating Fund (601) for this phase of the Project.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee as this is a capital improvement project specifically listed in the Capital Improvement Program budget, which was previously approved by the City Council.

Prepared by: Tatiana Arnaout, City Engineer

ATTACHMENTS

1. Northern Digital, Inc. - A-8243 Third Amendment

2. NDI Proposal

3. Northern Digital, Inc. A-8243 Original - Second Amendment 38 THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL AGREEMENT (V-01-17-19) Agreement No. A-8243

THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Third Amendment (“Third Amendment”) to the professional services agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into in the County of Ventura, State of California, this 15 day of March , 2022, by and between the City of Oxnard, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Northern Digital, Inc. (“Consultant”). This Second Amendment amends the Agreement entered into on March 02, 2021, by City and Consultant. The Agreement previously has been amended on June 28, 2021, by a First Amendment and on January 25, 2022 by a Second Amendment.

City and Consultant agree as follows:

1. In Section 6 of the Cover Page of the Agreement, the Total Agreement Amount Not to Exceed of “$266,200” is hereby deleted and replaced with “$344,700”.

2. The reference to the, “Scope of Services Exhibit A”, everywhere it is listed both on the Cover Page and in the Agreement is hereby amended to add also the, “Scope of Services Exhibit A-1”. The “Scope of Services Exhibit A-1”, is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

3. As so amended, the Agreement remains in full force and effect. [Signatures on next page]
39 Agreement No. A-8243
THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL AGREEMENT (V-01-17-19)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Amendment on the date first written above.

CITY OF OXNARD NORTHERN DIGITAL, INC.

John C. Zaragoza, Mayor1 Date Martin Obermire, Executive2 Date Alexander Nguyen, City Manager Vice President
Daniel Willhite, Purchasing Manager
Buyer
Monica Hummel, Corporate Date
ATTEST: Secretary

N/A
Rose Chaparro, City Clerk Date
(only if Mayor signs)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Stephen M. Fischer, City Date
Attorney (always required)

1 The City Council must authorize and the Mayor must sign the amendment if the original contract and all amendments collectively total over $200,000 annually. The City Manager may authorize and sign the amendment if the original contract and all amendments collectively total over $100,000 but up to $200,000 annually. The Purchasing Manager may authorize and sign the amendment if the original contract and all amendments collectively total up to $100,000 annually. A Buyer may authorize and sign the amendment if the original contract and all amendments collectively total up to $25,000 annually.
2 The City requires the following for any contract:
• For a corporation, the signatures of the Board President, CEO or Vice President and of the Board Secretary, Assistant Secretary, CFO or Assistant Treasurer;
• For an LLC, the signatures of at least two managers of the LLC (company directors, not lower-level managers); or • For a partnership, the signature of a partner. If the partnership is a limited partnership, the signer must be a general partner.

If the company has a different structure, or if the above-listed persons are not the appropriate signers, please submit to the City Attorney legally-binding documentation stating who can sign and bind your company. 40 Scope of Services Exhibit A-1
The following scope will be included as part of this delta design effort:

Scope Rebaselining and Initial Planning HOURS
Project Delta-Scope Plan Development – [5010-
510-500]

32.00 Perform Field Surveys/Investigation (Data
Gathering for Relocation of PLC 1 & New Server
Room (Trip 1), and Communications (Trip 2)) -
[5010-513-500]

32.00 Perform Technical Meeting for Delta Design
Objectives and Planning

24.00 Network & Communications Design HOURS
Evaluation of existing communications (fiber &
radio) system including wiring, routing, power
and signaling associated with the existing
communications infrastructure to address actions
from PDR including redundancy.

24.00 Develop Specification Requirements for
Communications. Assumes providing the
specifications for the required Communications
equipment and system performance parameters.

1. Communications Panel(s) & Equipment
Requirements

24.00 Modify existing network design and preliminary
plans to allow the Operations/Engineering team to
control, manage and secure the SCADA system.

Requires additional network design, security
requirements and firewalls.

Assumes providing:

1. One updated network architecture diagram

2. Patch Panel Overviews/Layout(s)

3. Additions to Conduit Schedule

80.00 Perform Engineering Review of Technical Design
Package

24.00 Design for Relocation of Server Hardware Into
Server Room:

HOURS
Review requirements of the new Server Room and
provide oversight regarding the development of
the plans and specifications.

16.00 CAD Drawings associated with new Server Room
and requirements. Assumes providing one Layout
Drawing with associated server racks. Assumes

32.00 41
providing updated wiring and cable schedules for
the routing to the servers. Assumes specifications
for room temperature control for server
maintenance.

Design for Relocation of PLC1 (originally to
remain in same location):

HOURS
Evaluation of existing wiring, routing, power, and
signal requirements to generate design alternatives
for feasibility of relocating PLC1 into the main
building. (May require Trip )

24.00 Specification Requirements for relocation of
PLC1.

32.00 Engineering Plans associated with relocation of
PLC1:

Demolition Plans, Engineering Notes, New Plans,
Conduit Schedule, Wiring Schedule,
Communications Re-Routing Details. Assumes
that the existing panel can be used as a
Marshalling Panel.

88.00 Delta Design Review: HOURS
Prepare Delta Design Review Package for new
scope items.

24.00 Review Delta Design Package internally. 8.00
Conduct Delta Design Review Meeting with
Team.

16.00 Additional Bid Support HOURS
RFI responses, and other additional bid phase
support.

16.00 Project Management HOURS
Project Coordination and Oversight - [5090-590-
500]

32.00 Meetings & Conference Calls [5090-591-500] 16.00
Total Hours 544.00
42 Proposal
City of Oxnard
City of Fullerton
SCADA Upgrades Project
Additional Scope from 30% PDR
NDI Proposal 21265-01
January 14, 2022
43 Proposal 21265-01
January 14, 2022
City of Oxnard
ATTN: Tim Beaman
RE: NDI Proposal to provide additional design scope to the City of Oxnard in Support of the SCADA Upgrades Project
Please find NDI’s cost proposal attached to provide additional design and support scope for the City of Oxnard’s SCADA upgrade project. Please reference the Clarifications section for further details on Clarifications & Exclusions.

NDI has over 33+ years of industry experience, and has an extensive background in providing control systems engineering services in numerous Oil & Gas Production as well as Water/Wastewater Industry applications. Northern Digital is an industry leader in providing technical solutions and integration services to a wide variety of Oil & Gas Production Companies as well as Water Agencies, Municipalities, and Independent Water Companies. Our core value of relationships forged in commitment aims to develop lasting partnerships with our clients. NDI strives to ensure that we meet or exceed all of your project expectations.

We are grateful for this opportunity to submit our proposal to your organization. Should you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to reach out to me. Thank you and we are excited at the prospect of working with your team.

Sincerely,
Joseph Marcus
Northern Digital, Inc.

Manager, Business Development
W: 661.322.6044
M: 661.319.4015
E: [email protected]
Martin Obermire
Northern Digital, Inc.

Executive Vice President
W: 661.322.6044
M: 661.330.2429
E: [email protected]
1 44
Proposal 80006-31
Cost Breakdown

COST BREAKDOWN
Total Budgetary Cost for Delta Design Tasks: $78,500.00 Deliverables
LABOR (1 OF 3)
The following scope will be included as part of this delta design effort:

Scope Rebaselining and Initial Planning
Project Delta-Scope Plan Development - [5010-510-500] C 32.00 Perform Field Surveys/Investigation (Data Gathering for Relocation of PLC 1 & New Server Room (Trip 1), and
Communications (Trip 2)) - [5010-513-500] C 32.00
Perform Technical Meeting for Delta Design Objectives and Planning C 24.00
Network & Communications Design (1 of 2)
Evaluation of existing communications (fiber & radio) system including wiring, routing, power and signaling associated with the existing communications infrastructure to address actions from PDR including redundancy. SE 24.00
Develop Specification Requirements for Communications.

Assumes providing the specifications for the required
Communications equipment and system performance
parameters.

1. Communications Panel(s) & Equipment Requirements SE 24.00 2 45
Proposal 21265-01
LABOR (2 OF 3)
Network & Communications Design (2 of 2)
Modify existing network design and preliminary plans to allow the Operations/Engineering team to control, manage and secure the SCADA system. Requires additional network design, security requirements and firewalls.

Assumes providing:

1. One updated network architecture diagram

2. Patch Panel Overviews/Layout(s)

3. Additions to Conduit Schedule SE 80.00
Perform Engineering Review of Technical Design Package C 24.00 Design for Relocation of Server Hardware Into Server Room:

Review requirements of the new Server Room and provide
oversight regarding the development of the plans and
specifications. C 16.00
CAD Drawings associated with new Server Room and
requirements. Assumes providing one Layout Drawing with associated server racks. Assumes providing updated wiring and cable schedules for the routing to the servers. Assumes specifications for room temperature control for server
maintenance. SE 32.00
Design for Relocation of PLC1 (originally to remain in same location):

Evaluation of existing wiring, routing, power, and signal requirements to generate design alternatives for feasibility of relocating PLC1 into the main building. (May require Trip 3) SE 24.00 Specification Requirements for relocation of PLC1. SE 32.00 Engineering Plans associated with relocation of PLC1:

Demolition Plans, Engineering Notes, New Plans, Conduit Schedule, Wiring Schedule, Communications Re-Routing
Details. Assumes that the existing panel can be used as a Marshalling Panel. SE 88.00
3 46
Proposal 80006-31
LABOR (3 OF 3)
Delta Design Review:

Prepare Delta Design Review Package for new scope items. SE 24.00 Review Delta Design Package internally. C 8.00
Conduct Delta Design Review Meeting with Team. SE 16.00 Additional Bid Support
RFI responses, and other additional bid phase support. SE 16.00 Project Management
Project Coordination and Oversight - [5090-590-500] PM 32.00 Meetings & Conference Calls [5090-591-500] PM 16.00
Total Hours 544.00
Travel & Expenses Budget: $1,000.00 (3 onsite visits, 2 SEs, 1 day each trip - non-overnight) Note: 2 visits will be required and a 3rd visit may be required. NDI will attempt to complete all onsite data gathering within 2 trips.
4 47
Proposal 21265-01

CLARIFICATIONS
Northern Digital has the following clarifications:

1. A schedule was established during the 30% PDR with a plan for the construction, startup and commissioning phase to end in December 2023. Based on the additional scope described in this proposal, a new schedule (Rev B00) was submitted to the City, projecting that the project will now last through the end of March 2024.
a. Delta PDR 8-10 weeks
b. 75% Design June 2022
c. 95% Design July 2022
d. Bid Solicited August 2022
e. Bid Award September 2022
f. Completion March 2024

2. A proposal for NDI to provide support to the City during the Submittals & Construction phase of the project can be provided. Please advise if a budgetary T&M proposal is desired.

3. Schedule above assumes a 2-week turnaround time for Design Reviews.

PAYMENT TERMS
Progress payments are required. Monthly billing is based on a Schedule of Values. Payments are due net 30 days from the date of invoice. All invoice amounts, which are 30 days past due will be subject to an interest penalty of 1.5% per month or the highest interest rate allowed by law. 5 48
49 50
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66
67 68
69 70
71 72
73 74
75 76
77 78
79 80
81 82
83 84

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.5
DATE: March 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Alexander Hamilton, Fire Chief, (805) 385-7700, [email protected] SUBJECT: Purchase Order Western Extrication Specialist Inc $316,748.40.

RECOMMENDATION
That City Council authorize the Mayor to sign a Purchase Order with Western Extrication Specialists Inc. for $316,748.40 to purchase battery-operated extrication equipment. (Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development Committee approved 3-0.)

BACKGROUND
On November 16, 2021 City Council ratified the submission of a Ventura County Transportation Commission (VCTC) Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) grant application for the procurement of battery operated extrication equipment to be shared among fire departments operating in the Ventura Operational Area. Ventura County Fire Protection District (VCFOD), Oxnard Fire Department (OFD), Ventura City Fire Department (VFD), and Fillmore Fire Department (FFD) are joint partners within the Ventura Operational Area.

VCFPD, VFD, FFD and OFD equip all frontline engines and trucks with Holmatro brand hydraulic extrication tools. It is imperative that all agencies use the same tools for interoperability purposes. The equipment currently used by the agencies requires external power accessed by connecting the tools to a generator using one inch hoses. The hoses can be subject to damage, punctures, and leaks while on the scene of a collision as they are dragged over sharp objects, glass, and metal in an effort to reach the trapped individual. The hoses also pose a trip hazard for fires responders at the scene of a crash.

The use of battery-powered extrication tools can save critical minutes during vehicle rescues. The battery operated tools are not limited by their proximity to the generator and can be used further from the roadway. Additionally, the battery operated tools are lighter and allow for greater operator control.

DISCUSSION
VCTC awarded $317,000 for the Ventura Operational Area to purchase battery operated extrication equipment. Holmatro brand extrication equipment is used by all area agencies for interoperability purposes. Western Extrication Specialists is the sole factory authorized for sales and service for Ventura County.

A review of emergency responses in the region determined the best allocation of equipment between the partner agencies.

Agency Equipment Cost
Fillmore Fire 2 Rams
4 Batteries
1 Charger
$24,824.54
85 Oxnard Fire 3 Spreaders
3 Cutters
1 Combination Tool
14 Batteries
4 Chargers
$107,142.88
Ventura City Fire 1 Spreader
1 Cutter
4 Batteries
1 Charger
$30,380.16
Ventura County Fire Protection 5 Spreaders
5 Cutters
20 Batteries
5 Chargers
$151,900.82
Total $316,748.40
The City of Oxnard will purchase all equipment and distribute accordingly between the regional partners.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact to General Fund. VCTC SAFE has awarded $317,000 in grant funds received in project 772299 account 217-2220-531.72-31.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
The Community Services, Public Safety, Housing & Development Committee approved 3-0 on February 22, 2022 to approve the staff recommendation and to forward the item for Council approval.

Prepared by: Amy Van Atta, Management Analyst II

ATTACHMENTS

1. Western Extrication Quote 1725

2. PO 8528 Western Extrication
86 Western Extrication Specialists, Inc.

P.O. Box 1065
Simi Valley, CA 93062
+1 8056247475
http://www.holmatro-westx.com
Price Quote

ADDRESS
Oxnard Fire Department
360 W 2nd St.

Oxnard, CA 93030
PRICE QUOTE # 1725
DATE 01/20/2022
EXPIRATION DATE 06/30/2022

TECH/SALES REP.

Dane Jackson

DATE ARTICLE NUMBER DESCRIPTION QTY RATE AMOUNT
159.000.064 PSP40 SPREADER 9 13,341.00 120,069.00T
159.000.063 PCU50 CUTTER 9 12,917.00 116,253.00T
159.000.207 PTR50 TELESCOPIC RAM 2 10,395.00 20,790.00T 151.000.583 PBPA287 BATTERY 42 760.00 31,920.00T
151.000.742 PBCH2 BATTERY CHARGER
120VAC
11 603.00 6,633.00T
159.000.118 PCT50 COMBI TOOL 1 13,627.00 13,627.00T
This quote is for Pentheon spreaders, cutters, T-Ram, combi-tool, batteries and chargers at list price to apply for a county wide grant.

Shipping is just an estimate and may be adjusted at the time of invoicing.

SUBTOTAL 309,292.00
DISCOUNT 7% -21,650.44
TAX 26,606.84
SHIPPING 2,500.00
TOTAL $316,748.40
Accepted By Accepted Date
87 VENDOR PHONE: (805)624-7475
VENDOR FAX: ( ) -
VENDOR #: 22860 P
VENDOR ADDRESS: WESTERN EXTRICATION

SPECIALIST
SHIP TO: FIRE DEPT
4350 ADAM RD. 360 W. 2ND ST.

SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063 OXNARD, CA 93030

Our P.O. # MUST Appear on ALL Invoices, Packages and Correspondence DELIVER BY REQUISITION # REQUISITION DATE CONFIRMED BY
01/25/2022 0000005901 01/25/2022 DANE JACKSON

FOB ACCOUNT NUMBER AUTHORIZED BY
21722208028606 RENEE KNIGHT
ITEM
#

QUANTITY/
UNIT

DESCRIPTION

ARTICLE OR SERVICE
UNIT
COST

EXTENDED
COST
By acceptance of this purchase order, you agree to the attached terms and conditions of the City of Oxnard

Page 1 of 3 ends

PURCHASE ORDER

CITY OF OXNARD
300 WEST 3RD STREET
OXNARD, CA 93030

PURCHASE
ORDER NO.
008528
DATE: 2/23/2022

1 316,748.40
/ DL
9 SPREADERS, 9 CUTTERS, 2 RAMS, 1 COMBI,
42 BATT 1.0000 316,748.40

NSS 21-181,
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE 2/22/22
CITY COUNCIL MEETING 3/15/22

DELIVERY BY COMMON CARRIER
NO BTC RQRD*AM
CIVIC CLERK#2022-1740
NTE $316,748.40, ONE TIME PURCHASE

In order to receive payment, email all invoices to:
[email protected]

In the subject line, reference the Purchase
Order number above.

TOTAL PURCHASE AMOUNT $316,748.40
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE. _______________________
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
88 VENDOR PHONE: (805)624-7475
VENDOR FAX: ( ) -
VENDOR #: 22860 P
VENDOR ADDRESS: WESTERN EXTRICATION

SPECIALIST
SHIP TO: FIRE DEPT
4350 ADAM RD. 360 W. 2ND ST.

SIMI VALLEY, CA 93063 OXNARD, CA 93030

Our P.O. # MUST Appear on ALL Invoices, Packages and Correspondence DELIVER BY REQUISITION # REQUISITION DATE CONFIRMED BY
01/25/2022 0000005901 01/25/2022 DANE JACKSON

FOB ACCOUNT NUMBER AUTHORIZED BY
21722208028606 RENEE KNIGHT
ITEM
#

QUANTITY/
UNIT

DESCRIPTION

ARTICLE OR SERVICE
UNIT
COST

EXTENDED
COST
By acceptance of this purchase order, you agree to the attached terms and conditions of the City of Oxnard

Page 2 of 3 ends

PURCHASE ORDER

CITY OF OXNARD
300 WEST 3RD STREET
OXNARD, CA 93030

PURCHASE
ORDER NO.
008528
DATE: 2/23/2022

Page 3 of 3 ends

PURCHASE ORDERS

TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The City Purchasing Officer and the Vendor agree as follows:

1. Vendor shall furnish to City the labor, materials, equipment, supplies and/or services described in the Purchase Order preceding this page.

2. City shall pay to Vendor the price, or prices, specified in the Purchase Order upon delivery of the labor, materials, equipment, supplies and/or services, and acceptance thereof by the City Purchasing Officer, or upon the completion of the services to be performed and acceptance thereof.

3. If the Purchase Order is continuing in nature, City shall pay to Vendor the amount due Vendor for labor, materials, equipment or supplies furnished, or services completed and accepted.

4. Vendor shall deliver the labor, materials, equipment or supplies, or cause the services to be performed, within the time and in the manner specified in the Purchase Order. Vendor shall be excused in performance for delays resulting from causes beyond the control of Vendor.

5. If services are performed or labor furnished to City under the Purchase Order, Vendor agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend City, its City Council, and each member thereof, and every officer, employee, representative or agent of City, from any and all liability claims, demands, actions, damages (whether in contract or tort, including personal injury, death at any time, or property damage), costs and financial loss, including all costs and expenses and fees of litigation or arbitration, that arise directly or indirectly from any acts or omissions related to this Agreement performed by Vendor or its agents, employees, subcontractors, consultants and other persons acting on Vendor’s behalf. This agreement to indemnify, hold harmless and defend shall apply whether such acts or omissions are the product of active negligence, passive negligence, willfulness or acts for which Vendor or its agents, employees, subcontractors, consultants and other persons acting on Vendor’s behalf would be held strictly liable. Vendor’s obligation to defend shall arise when a claim, demand or action is made or filed, whether or not such claim, demand or action results in a determination of liability or damages as to which Vendor is obligated to indemnify and hold harmless.

6. Insurance
a) Vendor shall obtain and maintain during the performance of any services under this Agreement the following insurance coverage issued by a company satisfactory to the Risk Manager, unless the Risk Manager waives, in writing, the requirement that Vendor obtain and maintain such insurance coverage.
i. Commercial general liability insurance, including a contractual liability endorsement, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage for each claimant for general liability with coverage equivalent to Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG0001ED, November 1988); ii. Business automobile liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage for each claimant for automobile liability with coverage equivalent to Auto Liability Insurance Services Office coverage (Occurrence Form CA000TED, June 1992) covering Code No. 1, “any auto”; iii. Workers’ compensation insurance in compliance with the laws of the State of California, including employer’s liability insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per claimant.

7. Vendor, in the performance of any services or the furnishing of any labor under this Purchase Order, shall be considered an independent contractor, and Vendor and Vendor’s agents and employees shall not be considered officers or employees of the City.

8. Vendor, without the written consent of the City Purchasing Officer, shall not:
a) Assign the Purchase Order, or any interest therein, or any money due thereunder; or b) Make any changes, alterations or variations in the terms of the Purchase Order.

9. The cost of inspection on deliveries, or offers to make deliveries that do not meet specifications, will be paid by Vendor or deducted by City from amounts due Vendor.

10. Vendor shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its officers and employees, from liability, claims, loss or expense of any kind or nature on account of any copyrighted or uncopyrighted composition, patented or unpatented process or invention, article or appliance furnished or used under this Purchase Order.

11. Vendor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local ordinance, laws and regulations and shall obtain and pay for all required licenses and permits, including a City of Oxnard business license.

12. Return or exchange of materials, equipment or supplies will not be permitted without written approval by the City Purchasing Officer.

13. All materials, supplies and equipment furnished under the Purchase Order shall, where applicable, be in full compliance with the Safety Orders and Regulations of the Division of Industrial Safety of the State of California and the Williams-Steiger Federal Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970.

14. City may terminate this Purchase Order at any time by giving written notice of termination to Vendor. If termination is for cause, termination shall become effective on the date of the notice or at a later date, specified in the notice. If termination is without cause, termination shall become effective five days after the date of the notice or at a later date specified in the notice.

15. Vendor shall comply with all applicable equal employment opportunity requirements of the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing in performing or contracting for any services under this Purchase Order.

16. For public projects, Vendor shall pay prevailing wages in accordance with Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR GRANT-FUNDED PROJECTS

17. The following requirements apply to any Purchase Order funded in whole or in part by federal grant funds. a) Upon expiration of the time specified on the reverse side, this Purchase Order shall terminate unless City and Vendor have mutually agreed in writing to an extension of time.
b) If legal action is brought by either party because the other has failed to comply with terms or conditions of this Purchase Order, the prevailing party shall be awarded its attorney’s fees and costs in addition to its damages and/or equitable relief. c) Vendor shall comply with all applicable requirements of Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order 11375 and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto (41 CFR Chapter 60), which provide that no person shall be discriminated against on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
d) Vendor shall insure that the grantee (City), the Federal Grantor Agency, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any duly authorized representative, shall have access to any books, records, documents and papers, specifically relating to this Purchase Order, for the purpose of making audit, examination, excerpts and transcriptions for not less than three years after completion of the project and/or until the completion of the final project audit as required by the Federal Grants Agency.

90 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.6
DATE: March 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Michael Wolfe, Public Works Director, (805) 385-8055, [email protected] SUBJECT: Resolution for a Grant from California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program.

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to:

1. Accept a grant from the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program in the amount of $1,258,764.85 for delinquent water charges related to COVID-19;

2. Apply for a grant from the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program in the amount of $848,092.67 for delinquent wastewater charges related to COVID-19; and

BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 public health emergency has heavily impacted the financial well-being of many Oxnard residents and businesses. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) created a new short-term funding program, the California Water and Wastewater Arrearage Payment Program (CWWAPP). This program was funded with $985 million in federal funding authorized by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA). ARPA funding has been allocated by the State legislature to the SWRCB, to provide one-time relief to community water and wastewater systems for unpaid water and wastewater bill debt related to the pandemic. Pursuant to meeting specific program requirements, this funding will cover utility bill debt for specific residential and commercial customers accrued during the COVID-19 relief period from March 4, 2020 to June 15, 2021, as determined by the State. A grant match is not required from the City.

DISCUSSION
In early September 2021, SWRCB began accepting pre-applications for the CWWAPP. The pre-application required data from water systems that provided information on water customer arrearages for the COVID-19 relief period. City staff worked diligently to gather the data required in order to submit the pre-application as early as possible, thus increasing the chances of receiving any funding. After applying the State’s requirements for eligibility, it was determined that 2,545 residential accounts with past-due water bills of $1,052,038.27 and 163 commercial accounts with past-due water bills of $170,063.53, for a total of $1,222,101.80 were eligible for funding relief from the CWWAPP. The pre-application was submitted on the SWRCB’s Electronic Annual Reporting System on September 10, 2021.

On October 27, 2021, the SWRCB notified the City that applications for water arrearages funding were now being accepted from water systems that had submitted the pre-application. 91 On January 4, 2022, SWRCB notified the City that it was awarded the full amount of $1,222,101.80 plus an additional $36,663.05 for administrative costs for a total award of $1,258,764.85. The check arrived by the end of January and was deposited on February 2, 2022. The relief program requires water systems to distribute the funds as a credit to water customers within 60 days of receiving funds, which is April 3, 2022. Additionally, the City must notify recipients in writing the amount to be credited on their water bill. Customers do not need to repay any credits they receive. The City is required to return any remaining, unallocated funds not credited to customers and unused administrative cost funds within six months of receipt along with final reporting requirements.

It is unlikely that all water arrearages will be covered by this funding due to the limited relief period established by the SWRCB. As a result, the City will continue to work with customers with arrearages to set up payment plans. The City currently does not shut off water service on any account due to the pandemic.

Deadlines from SWRCB provided a very short window of time for the pre-application, application, notification to the customer, and then the distribution of the funds to customer accounts. In order to meet the deadline requirements, the necessary information was submitted to the State within the timeframes required. This staff report recommends approving the receipt of the water funding associated with the prior submittal.

Additional funding in the program has been made available for wastewater arrearages. As of February 1, 2022, preapplications were being accepted by the SWRCB for residential and commercial wastewater arrearages. City staff calculated 1,603 residential accounts with arrearages totaling $733,255.32 and 91 commercial accounts with arrearages totaling $90,135.62. Staff intends to submit all required documentation to receive additional funding estimated at $823,390.94 for wastewater arrearages and $24,701.73 for administrative costs for a total of $848,092.67 in CWWAPP funding. Staff recommends submitting documents necessary for the wastewater funding.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The awarded amount of $1,258,764.85, which includes 3% for administrative costs, will be used to reduce outstanding balances for delinquent water charges for customers that meet the State’s specific eligibility requirements. A new appropriation is required in the amount of $1,258,764.85 in State Grant Fund 219 Project 666001 to properly record the revenue and expenditures for this grant award.

The requested application amount of $848,092.67, which includes 3% for administrative costs, will be used to reduce outstanding balances for delinquent wastewater charges for customers that meet the State’s specific eligibility requirements. Grant funding will be appropriated upon award notification.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
Due to the short timeline given for the grant application process, this item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Omar Castro, Water Division Manager, Jan Hauser, Wastewater Division Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Water Arrearages - Resolution
92 RESOLUTION NO. _________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION AND

ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT AWARD FROM THE CALIFORNIA WATER

AND WASTEWATER ARREARAGE PAYMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Oxnard City Council Resolution No.12,053 sets out the procedure by which City staff may submit grant applications, following approval by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department has requested that City Council approve the submittal of an application to the California State Water Resources Control Board and acceptance of a grant award for an amount not to exceed $1,258,764.85 in Water Arrearages Payment Program funds to be used for outstanding delinquent water charges from March 4, 2020 to June 15, 2021.

WHEREAS, the Public Works Department has requested that City Council approve the submittal of an application to the California State Water Resources Control Board for an amount not to exceed $848,092.67 in Wastewater Arrearages Payment Program funds to be used for outstanding delinquent wastewater charges from March 4, 2020 to June 15, 2021 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Oxnard resolves to approve the submittal of a grant application and acceptance of a grant award by the City Manager to the California State Water Resources Control Board for the purpose of obtaining grant funding for water and wastewater customer arrearages. The City Council further resolves that the City Manager or designee is authorized to execute grant agreements; the Finance Director or designee is authorized to submit financial reports and grant claims and approve special budget appropriations for the use of grant funds; and the Director of Public Works or designee is authorized to submit non-financial reports.

PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS _____ day of ______________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:
___________________________
John C. Zaragoza, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
___________________________ ____________________________ Rose Chaparro, City Clerk Stephen M. Fischer, City Attorney 93 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

INFORMATION/CONSENT AGENDA
AGENDA ITEM NO. L.7
DATE: March 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Vyto Adomaitis, Community Development Director, (805) 385-7882, [email protected] SUBJECT: Approving the Appeal and overturning the Planning Commission’s Denial of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)) for the proposed Starbucks at 2551 North Vineyard Avenue (APN: 132-0-043-215)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

1. Find the Project to be Categorically Exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities); and

This item did not originate in Committee.

BACKGROUND
On February 15, 2022, the City Council conducted a public hearing to considered the Appeal of Planning Commission’s (“Commission”) January 13, 2022, denial of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)) (Attachment A). The City Council made a Motion of Intent to approve the Appeal and overturn the Commission’s denial of the Project as the City Council could make all of the Findings required to grant the Major Modification in accordance with Oxnard City Code Section 16-531. Staff indicated at the February 15, 2022 meeting that staff would to return with a Resolution of Approval, subject to certain conditions and Findings. The City Council’s motion was carried by a vote of 7:0.

Staff has prepared the Resolution approving the Appeal and overturning the Planning Commission’s Denial of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)) (Attachment B). The City Council Resolution includes five revised Conditions of Approval, which were requested in response to the original Commission Resolution to approve the Project (presented on October 21, 2021) and supported and accepted by the applicant team, staff and the Commission at the Commission’s meeting on November 4, 2021. The revised conditions have been identified below:

9. Developer shall provide off-street parking for the project, including the number of spaces, stall size, paving, striping, location, and access, as required by the City Code except as modified by the Administrative Parking Relief granted by the Planning Commission. (PL/B, G-9). Each compact parking stall is to have the word “compact” painted at the entrance of the space in letters a minimum of eight-inches in height. 94 107. The Transportation Demand Management Plan shall provide direction for onsite circulation signage. The project design shall include appropriate onsite traffic signs to instruct drivers not to queue in the public sidewalk and public roadway to the City Traffic Engineer’s satisfaction. Signage shall indicate that there is additional parking onsite.

Onsite directional signage shall be designed with one double-faced permanent directional sign per vehicular entrance, provided such signs do not exceed three square feet in area each. Onsite traffic sign square footage shall not be included within the total Advertising Signs sign area, as defined by Oxnard City Code, Chapter 16, Article IX, allowed on the project site. (TR)
116. An Occupancy Plan must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The Occupancy Plan must clearly state how recyclable and organic material, as appropriate, will be managed on site to be in compliance with applicable state laws (AB 939, AB 341, AB 1826, SB 1383); how restaurant staff will participate in the program; and how customers will be alerted altered to the presence of recycling on site and how contamination will be minimized. The Occupancy Plan must include what service provider(s) will manage/transport materials to appropriate facilities for processing and/or disposal.
139. All overhangs are required to be sprinklered as required by City Code. 140. Trash enclosure is required to be sprinklered as required by City Code.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item supports Economic Development strategy. The purpose of Economic Development strategy is to focus on the retention and expansion of Oxnard businesses by increasing the skills and employability of our local workforce, invite new business investments, and target site-based redevelopment opportunities.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Approval of the requested Appeal would overturn the Planning Commission's denial and allow for the redevelopment of the project site, and, if redeveloped, the Project is anticipated to generate additional tax revenue that would be directly added to the City’s General Fund.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item did not originate in Committee. This item was heard by the Planning Commission. This item was also noticed and heard as a Public Hearing at the February 15, 2022 Council Meeting.

Prepared by: Scott Kolwitz, Planning Manager, Joe Pearson II, Senior Planner

ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment A - City Council Staff Report dated March 15, 2022 (with only Attachment A - Planning Commission Staff Report dated 10_21_22)

2. Attachment B - Draft City Council Resolution
95 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

PUBLIC HEARINGS
AGENDA ITEM NO. M.2
DATE: February 15, 2022
TO: City Council
FROM: Vyto Adomaitis, Community Development Director, (805) 385-7882, [email protected] SUBJECT: Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations Appeal. (10/15/15)

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing:

3. Adopt a Resolution denying the Appeal and upholding the Planning Commission’s Denial of Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)), because the record does not contain the evidence necessary to make all of the Findings required by Oxnard City Code Section 16-531 in order to grant a Special Use Permit.
(This item did not originate in Committee)
Please click the following link to view the required Measure M pre-recorded presentation video: https://youtu.be/axNLuO3Q8G0

BACKGROUND
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

On January 13, 2022, the Planning Commission (“Commission”) denied Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)), a request by the Applicant to make modifications to an existing 2,450 square-foot drive-through fast food restaurant building to allow for a Starbucks drive-through coffee shop on a 0.66 acre site within the General Commercial-Planned Development (C-2-PD) zone (Attachments A & B). The is located at 2551 North Vineyard Avenue (APN: 132-0-043-215).

On January 19, 2022, a timely Appeal application was filed on behalf of the property owner, Friedrich Family Limited Partnership with the City (Attachment C). The Applicant and Appellant are one and the same, and they will be referred to as the “Appellant” throughout the remainder of this staff report. The Appellant submitted a supplemental letter on January 27, 2022 (Attachment D). The Appellant seeks City Council review of the Planning Commission's decision.

Staff recommends the City Council adopt a Resolution to deny the Appeal and uphold the Commission’s denial as there is no merit to the Appellant's Grounds of Appeal as described below in the Analysis and Discussion section of this staff report (Attachment E).

Denial of the Appeal would keep the site in its existing configuration and would not allow for the proposed operation of the Starbucks drive-through coffee shop.
54496
For the benefit of the Council, this staff report provides 1) a brief background on the Major Modification permit process, 2) the specific elements that are required to grant the requested Special Use Permit and a summary of the Findings which were made, 3) a summary of the Appeal, and 4) a discussion of the review and hearing process before the City Council.

BACKGROUND:

Major Modification Regulations
Section 16-561 of the OCC allows for Major Modifications to Special Use Permits. Major Modifications are those that involve substantial increases in coverage, major additions to the buildings or structures, creation of extra parking needs, traffic or other site problems. A Major Modification is processed in the same manner as a new Special Use Permit and must meet all of the same required findings. As with Special Use Permits, the Planning Commission is the decision maker on Major Modifications.

Required Findings to Grant a Special Use Permit
Pursuant to OCC Section 16-531, in order to grant a Special Use Permit, or a Major Modification, the following findings must be made:
(1) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and other adopted policies of the City of Oxnard. (2) The nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures shall be considered, and no proposed Special Use Permit shall be granted if the approval body finds such use will adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings or structures or to the public health, safety or general welfare. (3) The site that is subject to the Special Use Permit shall be adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping, and items which may be required by Section 16-532 (Conditions).
(4) The site that is subject to the Special Use Permit shall be served by highways adequate in width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use will generate. (5) The site that is subject to the Special Use Permit shall be provided with adequate sewerage, water, fire protection and storm drainage facilities.

Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)
On October 21, 2021, the Commission held a public hearing to consider Planning & Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 requesting approval of a Major Modification (MJMD). The project scope involved modifications to an existing 2,450 square-foot drive-through fast food restaurant building to allow for a Starbucks drive-through coffee shop on a 0.66 acre site. The proposed project is located at 2551 North Vineyard Avenue (APN: 132-0-043-215) within the 2030 General Plan land use designation of Commercial General and is zoned General Commercial-Planned Development (C-2-PD) in the City of Oxnard. Staff originally presented the project to the Commission with a recommendation for approval (Attachment 1).

On October 21, 2021, the Commission made a motion to continue the Project to the Commission’s meeting on November 4, 2021, at the request of the applicant.

On November 4, 2021, the Commission reviewed all of the information provided in the staff report and received a presentation from Starbucks representatives, as well as other pertinent information, and deliberated the merits of the Project. No verbal or written public comments were provided before or during the public comment period of the hearing.

Following the applicant's presentation and deliberations, the Commission voted on three motions. The first two motions were a Motion of Intent to Deny the project and a motion to Approve the project. These two motions failed as a result of two tie votes (3 to 3, with one Planning Commissioner absent). A third motion was approved to continue the item to the Commission's meeting on December 2, 2021.
54597
On December 2, 2021, all seven members of the Planning Commission were present. The Commissioner who was not present on November 4 confirmed he reviewed the staff materials and watched the video of the Commission’s November 4 meeting. The Commission provided an opportunity for public testimony, deliberated, and made a Motion of Intent to Deny the project as they could not make all of the Findings required to grant the Major Modification; however, a Resolution for denial was not available. Therefore, the Commission continued the project to January 13, 2022, to ratify the directed action.

On January 13, 2022, the Commission voted 4-3, to adopt Resolution 2022-02 to deny the project (Attachment B).

Pursuant to Sections 16-544 and 16-545 of the Oxnard City Code (“OCC”), the action of the Planning Commission is final unless an appeal application to the City Council is filed within 18 days after the action date.

On January 19, 2022, the Appellant filed a timely Appeal application with the City (Attachment C), and the Appellant submitted a supplemental letter on January 27, 2022 (Attachment D). The supplemental letter did not raise any additional Appeal items but provided additional narrative to their Appeal application.

ANALYSIS/DISCUSSION:

The Appellant has appealed the decision of the Commission primarily because the Appellant believes Findings can be made to approve the Project. The Appellant's five grounds of appeal are noted below, verbatim, with staff’s response following each ground of appeal:

Ground of Appeal 1: “This project, Starbucks at Vineyard/RiverPark, meets all of the Requirements of the Zoning Code and the General Plan.”
Staff Response:

This is incorrect. As discussed in the Commission staff report and presented to the Commission, the Project fails to meet three requirements of the Oxnard City Code (OCC).
1) The Project as designed does not provide the required 50 parking spaces. 2) The proposed parking does not meet the required standard parking space dimensions. 3) The project does not provide a designated loading space, which is required for all restaurants.

As a result, the Project included a request for an administrative parking relief to allow for two modifications:
1) Allow for a decrease in the number of required parking spaces from 50 parking spaces to 35 parking spaces, including 15 spaces which were to be provided via the drive-through queue, and 2) to allow for 11 of the required parking spaces to be compact parking spaces.

In addition to the two administrative parking relief requests, the Project included a request to modify the loading space requirement, to allow for loading to occur in the designated parking spaces, as opposed to providing a separate loading zone.

While the OCC does allow for modifications to these requirements, the discretion to grant or deny each of the modifications is provided to the Commission. Therefore, without Commission approval of the three modifications, the Project does not meet all of the requirements of the OCC.

With respect to compliance with the 2030 General Plan, the existing development fails to provide a 30 foot landscaped buffer along the designated scenic corridor (North Vineyard Avenue). This is considered to be a “legal nonconforming” existing condition. The proposed Project did not increase the non-conformity, rather the Project provided additional landscaping and improvements to mitigate the reduced buffer width; however, the Project did not provide the full 30 feet buffer.

In conclusion, the Commission was not able to grant the administrative parking relief modifications, and could not make the required Findings necessary to grant a Special Use Permit. 54698
Ground of Appeal 2: “We have been working with Planning Staff for the last 18 months to get the proposed project to a point that met the City’s standards and requirements.”
Staff Response:

While City Staff did have preliminary conversations with the applicant team, including an initial request to allow for a Minor Modification, the formal application for the Major Modification was submitted on February 12, 2021. The time of the initial submission to the first scheduled hearing was approximately eight months. However, staff acknowledges that City staff, including members of the City’s Development Advisory Committee, worked through an iterative process with the Applicant team to explore both alternate site designs and parking / queue management strategies. This included multiple reviews by the City team, time for the applicant to revise and resubmit submittal materials and study project alternatives, and the required Community Workshop. Ultimately, the iterative approach resulted in a Project that staff could provide an approval recommendation to the Commission.

As further discussed in the Commission Staff Report, due to the operational characteristics of existing Starbucks drivethrough coffee shops operating in the City of Oxnard and beyond, City staff was concerned about traffic circulation both onsite and in the public right-of-way given the potential increase in the drive-through demand associated with the proposed Starbucks restaurant and inadequate vehicular queueing based on the existing configuration. As a result, multiple design alternatives were explored in coordination with various City departments, including Planning, Building and Engineering, Traffic, Fire, and Police. These conversations resulted in a reconfiguration of the proposed drivethrough lane which was redesigned to run along the perimeter of the site, to allow for a longer queue.

The Permit Streamlining Act provides timelines for processing quasi-judicial discretionary Projects, which effectively guarantees an opportunity for a public hearing in which decision makers may decide whether to approve or deny a Project within six months of an application being deemed complete. The Project was deemed complete once the Project design stopped changing (as it was found to be acceptable to both the applicant and City staff), and it was immediately scheduled for a public hearing on the next available Commission agenda, which occurred well within the statutory sixmonth timeframe.

In conclusion, the application was processed in a timely manner consistent with the Permit Streamlining Act. None of the Commission required Findings necessary to grant a Special Use Permit relating to processing timelines.

Ground of Appeal 3: “The denial by the Planning Commission was based on personal biases.” Staff Response:

The Appeal application fails to provide any evidence to support this claim, and therefore lacks any grounds to make this claim. As supported by the record, the Appellant's assertion that the denial was based on personal bias is incorrect. The Commission formulated their reasoning for their decision to Deny the project based on the inability to make three specific Findings based on substantial evidence and testimony as documented within Planning Commission Resolution 2022-02.

The Commission could not make the second Finding, because they found the proposed Project would adversely affect and be materially detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare due to the potential for cars entering into the Project site to back up onto the public right-of-way, thus adversely affecting the adjacent roadways and the East Vineyard Avenue and RiverPark Boulevard intersection, one of the busiest intersections in the City.

The Commission could not make the third Finding, because they found the site is not adequate in size and shape to accommodate the parking and loading facilities required pursuant to the Oxnard City Code.

The Commission could not make the fourth Finding, because they found the Project would create or significantly aggravate traffic problems on the adjacent roadways and intersections, which will have a direct and adverse impact on the adjacent highways (US 101 and CA 232). Each of the Commission’s reasoned conclusions are further detailed in Planning Commission Resolution 2022-02 (Attachment B).

Also, any assertion that the Commission is biased against Starbucks or other drive-through facilities is not supported by 54799
facts. At the following Commission hearing, held on January 20, 2022, the same Commissioners voted unanimously (with one member absent) to approve two other drive-through facilities, including a Starbucks coffee shop at 1720 Ventura Boulevard, as they could make the required Findings for approval for those specific projects. In addition to this recent approval, the City has a history of approving drive-through Starbucks coffee shops, where the Commission has found them to be appropriate and in compliance with the required Findings.

In conclusion, the Commission’s decision was the result of a deliberative process, and as one body the Commission voted to Deny the project with a split 4-3 vote.

Ground of Appeal 4: “The site has been used as a Drive-Thru restaurant for many years.” Staff Response:

While it is true that the existing site has been developed and operated as a drive-through since the 1980s, the Appellant’s implication is that there would be no impacts with the proposed Starbucks compared to the existing operations. That implication is incorrect as the existing and proposed operational characteristics are not equivalent.

Based on known operational characteristics of existing Starbucks drive-through coffee shops operating in the City of Oxnard and beyond, as well as parking and queueing data provided by the Appellant, the Project would significantly increase demand at this site. Based on information proved by the Appellant, the morning drive-through demand during the morning peak times would range from 10-18 vehicles, far exceeding the existing five vehicle queue length. Given the anticipated increase in the drive-through demand associated with the proposed Starbucks coffee shop, the existing configuration resulted in inadequate vehicular queueing based for the Project. As a result, City staff was concerned about traffic circulation both onsite and in the public right-of-way, which could collectively potentially interfere or block the adjacent street system and the intersection of North Vineyard Avenue/RiverPark Boulevard. Therefore, there is clear evidence that the proposed Project would result in a significant intensification of the drive-through use onsite compared to the existing operations.

In conclusion, the Commission found the proposed operational characteristics were different from the existing operational characteristics, and, for the reasons provided in Planning Commission Resolution 2022-02 (Attachment B), the Commission could not make all of the required findings. This statement fails to address or dispute the findings.

Ground of Appeal 5: “This project would enhance the site with a new facade, new landscaping, better site design for the trash enclosure and drainage, new fire apparatus (safer for consumers) and is EXCEEDING the amount of queueing spaces 3X the required amount.”
Staff Response:

The Commission acknowledged the physical improvements to the site that would be undertaken as part of the Project would enhance the aesthetics of the site, and result in improved site conditions with respect to the trash enclosure, drainage, and fire improvements. However, for the reasons provided in Planning Commission Resolution 2022-02 (Attachment B), the Commission could not make all of the required findings. This statement fails to address or dispute the Findings for denial.

With respect to the Project “EXCEEDING the amount of queueing spaces 3X the required amount”, the Project as designed provided sixteen (16) queuing spaces. The OCC requires a minimum of eight (8) stacking (queuing) spaces. So, while the project does exceed the minimum number of queuing spaces, it does not provide three times the spaces. Also, while OCC does have a code requirement of only 8 stacking (queuing) spaces, in order to make the Findings required for approval, each individual project must show that sufficient stacking is available to meet the project's demand. Therefore, on a project-by-project basis, additional stacking may be required to ensure the project will not have an adverse impact on adjacent uses, buildings or structures or to the public health, safety or general welfare.

Appeal Review and Hearing Process Before the City Council Pursuant to OCC Section 16-548, the City Council is provided with Review and Hearing Procedures and Quorum standards.
548 100
(A) A review of an Appeal from a decision of the Commission may be heard de novo. (B) On hearing the review or Appeal, the City Council shall primarily consider the issues raised by the grounds specified in the notice of review or Appeal, but shall not be restricted thereto. (C) The City Council may promulgate additional rules of procedure for review or Appeal hearings. (D) Rules governing evidence and procedure relating to review and Appeal hearings shall be liberally construed to effect enlightened consideration and determination by the City Council.

Staff highlights that per the above procedures, the City Council is primarily to consider the issues raised by the grounds specified in the notice of review or Appeal, but the City Council is not restricted to those issues.

Conclusion:

The Appellant requests the Commission’s denial of the Project be overturned based on the five appeal grounds.

Based on the above Analysis/Discussion Section, Staff’s responses collectively demonstrate the Appeal lacks merit, and the Commission’s determination on January 13, 2022 should remain unchanged. Thus, staff recommends that the City Council find there is no merit to the Appellant’s Grounds of Appeal, and the Appeal should not overturn the decision of the Commission to deny the Project. Furthermore, the City council staff report, attachments, and the specific Findings outlined in the City Council Resolution (Attachment E) provide substantial evidence in the record for the City Council to conclude that not all of the required Special Use Permit Findings found in OCC Section 16-531 have been made. Staff believes the required Findings are well documented and the City Council is in a position to deny the requested Special Use Permit.

Thus, staff recommends that City Council Find there is no merit to the Appellant’s Grounds of Appeal, deny the Appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission to Deny the project with the specific Findings outlined in the Resolution (Attachment E). Pursuant to OCC Section 16-551, the decision of the City Council is final.

STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
This agenda item is a routine operational item and does not relate to the four strategic plans adopted by City Council on May 17, 2016.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Denial of this request would retain the status quo of the project site, and consequently, there is no financial impact to the City’s General Fund.

COMMITTEE OUTCOME
This item is a public hearing and was heard by the Planning Commission; therefore, this item did not originate in Committee.

Prepared by: Scott Kolwitz, Planning Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Attachment A . Planning Commission Staff Reports and memos dated 10/21/21, 11/4/21, 12/2/21 and 1/13/22

2. Attachment B - Planning Commission Denial Resolution 2022-02.docx

3. Attachment C - Appeal Application

4. Attachment D - Starbucks Vineyard Appeal Letter

5. Attachment E - Draft CC Resolution #_______.docx.pdf

6. Attachment F PZ No. 21-550-01 Appeal Presentation CC Completed 549 101

PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Joe Pearson II, Senior Planner
DATE: October 21, 2021
SUBJECT: Project Name: Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)); 2551 North Vineyard Avenue; APN: 132-0-043-215
1) Recommendation: That the Planning Commission (“Commission”):
a) Find the Project to be Categorically Exempt from environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 (Existing Facilities); and
b) Adopt Resolution 2021-XX approving Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916 (Special Use Permit)), subject to certain findings and conditions.
2) Project Description and Applicant: The project includes modifications to an existing 2,450 square-foot drive through fast food restaurant building and to allow for a Starbucks coffee shop on a 0.66 acre site. The proposed improvements will consist of a series of site changes to convert the existing Wendy’s restaurant drive-through restaurant into a Starbucks drive-through coffee shop. The changes include a small 50 square-foot addition to allow for the relocation of the drive-through pick-up window. The resulting building will be 2,500 square feet. The exterior of the building will be renovated with new colors and materials which will consist of tan stucco and a bronze metal roof, with a weathered copper siding.

The site layout will be reconfigured to allow for a larger vehicle queue. The revised drive-through lane will increase the queuing capacity from 5 vehicles to 16 vehicles. The project includes a Transportation Demand Management Plan.

Other changes include revised signage, upgraded landscaping, and new parking lot striping.

A request for an administrative parking relief is also be requested to allow for two modifications: 1) Allow for a decrease in the number required parking spaces from 50 parking spaces to 35 parking spaces, including 15 spaces which are provided via the drive-through queue, and 2) allow for 11 of the required parking spaces to be compact parking spaces. The Project site is located at 2551 North Vineyard Avenue (APN:
550 102
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 2 of 11 ends

132-0-043-215) within the General Commercial Planned Development (C-2-PD) zone district and within the Commercial General land use designation (Attachment A). For purposes of this staff report, the foregoing Project Description shall be referred to as the “Project”. Filed by Beverly Metz, of Starbucks, 555 Anton Boulevard, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (the “Applicant”).

Please see the reduced Project plans (Attachment B) for more details. 3) Existing & Surrounding Land Uses: The Project site is currently developed with the existing Wendy’s drive-through restaurant and associated infrastructure improvements. The Project is located in the El Rio West neighborhood. The following table lists and identifies the General Plan Land Use Designations, Zoning Designations, and existing land uses of the Project site and properties immediately adjacent to the site, which are also illustrated in Attachment A:

LOCATION GENERAL PLAN ZONING EXISTING LAND USE
Project Site Commercial
General
General Commercial
Planned Development
(C-2-PD)
Fast Food Restaurant (Wendys)
North Residential Low
Single-Family Planned
Development
(R-1-PD)
Single Family
South Commercial
General
C-2-PD
Shopping Center
East Commercial
General
C-2-PD
Shopping Center
West
Commercial
Regional
Specific Plan
(RiverPark)
Fast Food Restaurant (McDonalds)
* Zoning consistent with the 2030 General Plan.
4) Background Information: The existing drive through restaurant and signage were approved in 1980, through a Special Use Permit. Since that time the site has generally remained unchanged, with only minor facade and landscape changes taking place. 5) Environmental Determination: In accordance with Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) of the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, projects involving “negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency’s determination” may be found to be exempt from the requirements of CEQA. The Project involves a request to convert an existing drive-through fast food restaurant to another drive-through coffee shop. The small addition will only increase the building size by 50 square feet or approximately 2 percent, and will be within the existing developed area. Onsite circulation will be improved through the realignment of the drive-through lane and a 551 103
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 3 of 11 ends

Transportation Demand Management Plan will be implemented for the site to prevent vehicles from backing-up into adjacent roadways. As a result, this Project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, or air quality. No Exceptions to the Exemptions (Section 15300.2) apply to defeat the Exemption. Therefore, staff has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that the Planning Commission direct the Planning & Environmental Services manager to file the Notice of Exemption (Attachment C) with the Ventura County Clerk pursuant to Section 15062 of the State CEQA Guidelines within five (5) working days of passage, approval and adoption of the project. 6) Project Analysis:
a) General Discussion: As discussed below, the Project has been found to be consistent with both the 2030 General Plan and the Oxnard City Code (OCC).

The Planning Commission is the decision maker for Major Modifications pursuant to OCC §16-561(A). The modified Project is being processed with a Major Modification; therefore, the Planning Commission is the decision maker for the project. b) General Plan Consistency: The City’s 2030 General Plan land use designation for the subject site is Commercial General which allows restaurants (including drive-throughs), retail sales, and other similar uses. The existing drive-through restaurant and the proposed Project will allow for the continuation of these types of uses. As a result, the approval of this project has been determined to be consistent with the 2030 General Plan and the property’s land use designation.

Consistency with the 2030 General Plan is defined by the relationship between 2030 General Plan policies and the proposed Project. The three consistency classification levels are:

I. Direct Applicability to a Proposed Project or Program (full text of the policy and an explanation).

II. Related or Indirect Applicability to the Proposed Project or Program (policy title and an explanation for each or groups of related or indirectly related policies).

III. No or Distant Applicability to the Proposed Project or Program (all policies not listed as Level I and II are assumed to be consistent). 552 104
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 4 of 11 ends

POLICY LEVEL POLICY OR TITLE EXPLANATION
CD-1.2 II
In-fill development, priority to
mixed use
The Project site is within a developed area of the
City and qualifies as infill.

CD 4.2 &
CD 9.2
I
Commercial Revitalization
and Redevelopment
The development will improve an older
development near the 101-Freeway with a
renovated commercial building with a drive-through
and enhancements to the landscaped parking lot.

CD 9.4 I View Corridor Preservation
North Vineyard Avenue at this location is a
designated scenic corridor which requires a
landscaped buffer of at least 30 feet. The existing
parking lot is located within this 30-foot area and is
considered to be a “legal nonconforming” existing
condition. The drive-through queue will be located
within this 30-foot paved area, but paved areas will
be removed and additional landscaping is proposed
to be installed in the 30-foot area bringing the
project site more into compliance with this standard.

ER-10.1-
&
ICS-19.2
I
Promote use of Native and
Water Wise Plants and Water
Supply Findings for Smaller
Projects
The Project incorporates native and water wise
plants and is conditioned to comply with City’s
Landscape and Water Conservation Standards
(Ordinance No. 2822) and applicable water
conservation requirements of the State of California.

CD-5.2
SH-6.4
II Compatible Land Use
The proposed building is consistent with the
allowable Commercial General land uses and will be
compatible with adjacent uses as designed, and is
not anticipated to generate nuisances.

CD-15.6 II Share of regional taxable sales
The Project will allow for the renovation of an
existing building to allow for a new business, which
will generate retail tax sales revenue to the City.

CD-14.1
CD-14.2
II
Design review process
Development Advisory
Committee (DAC) functions
The Development Advisory Committee (DAC)
review process led to changes in the Project and/or
conditions of approval that meet these Level II
policies.

CD-18.1
CD-18.5
II
Attract new businesses
Increase the availability of
land for new businesses
The Project will allow for the renovation of an
existing building to allow for new businesses to
open.

All others III All policies not listed above No or Distant Applicability to the Proposed Project. c) Conformance with Zoning Development Standards: The proposed Project is located in the General Commercial Planned Development (C-2 PD) zoning district. Note that the Project has two front yard setbacks because the parcel is a corner lot. The Project is found consistent with the applicable development standards with the approval of the Major Modification (MJMD), to allow for an administrative parking relief under OCC 553 105
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 5 of 11 ends

16-651(B)(4), “Off-site parking” Decrease in required parking spaces and OCC 16-651(B)(3), “Compact parking spaces”.

C-2-PD “GENERAL COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT” ZONE

DEVELOPMENT

STANDARD
REQUIREMENT PROPOSED COMPLIES?
Max. building height
(16-137 & 16-303)
2 stories at 35 ft. Additional stories
may be permitted as part of a SUP.

No Change, less than 35
feet
Yes
Front yard setback
(16-139)
10 ft from ultimate property line No Change, 15.16 ft Yes Side yard setback
(16-140)
Zero when abuts another C-2 zoned
lot.

No Change, 54.875 ft Yes
Rear yard setback
(16-141)
15 feet for buildings over 16 feet in
height
No Change, 81.08 ft Yes
Off-street parking:

Required (16-622)
Rounding (16-620)
Motorcycle (16-624)
Bicycle (16-623,
16-637)
Loading (16-644)
Parking Aisle
(16-639, Figure 5)
[ADA requirements
per State Title 24
Accessibility Code]
Administrative Relief
From Parking
Provisions (16-651)
Fast Food: 1 space per 50 gsf.
2,500 gsf =50 spaces
Special design requirements are
required if a drive- through facility is
proposed. Stacking credit in drive
through lane may count toward the
required parking at basis of one auto
per each 23 lineal feet of striped
stacking line. A maximum credit not
to exceed 30 percent of total
requirement or no more than 20
spaces may be applied for stacking
credit, whichever is less.

Bicycle (Five Spaces) = 5
Loading space for Hotels, motels, and
restaurants = 1 space, (12 ft x 40 ft).
16-644(B)(1), “Loading zone
requirements may be modified by the
planning commission… based on the
nature of the use…design
characteristics of the project.”
Aisle Width for 90
o parking = 25 ft
9 standard spaces + 11
compact spaces + Stacking
Credit of 15 Spaces = 35
Max of 15 spaces may be
counted toward stacking
credit.
6 spaces
No Change. Parking space
to be used for loading
during off hours.

Yes, subject to
approval of
administrative
relief from
parking.

Yes
Yes, subject to
Planning
Commission
approval
554 106
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 6 of 11 ends

Parking space sizes &
design:

Standard (16-636 &
16-638)
Motorcycle (16-638)
Loading (16-644)
Full Size: 9 ft W x 19 ft L
may overhang 2 ft over landscape if
planter min. 5 [16-616(C)]
Compact:8 ft Wx16 ft L; Max 25%
of spaces w/admin relief (50
(Required Spaces per OCC) x
.25 = 12.5 (maximum number
of compact spaces allowed)
Motorcycle: 4 ft W x 7 ft L
Loading: 12 ft W x 40 ft L (unless
alternative approval).

Standard Parking = 9 ft x
19 ft min
11 Compact Spaces
● 10 spaces 8.6 ft W x 19
ft L
● 1 space 9 ft W x 18 ft L
Motorcycle = 4.5 ft x7 ft
Loading Area - Standard
Parking Space (legal
nonconforming)
Yes, subject to
approval of
administrative
relief from
parking to allow
for compact
parking.

Drive-Through
Facilities
(16-647(D))
Stacking for three cars between the
order board and the pickup
window and stacking for five
cars behind the order board. (8
Spaces)
16 Spaces Yes
Parking Landscaping
(16-641):
● Along
streets/alleys
● Along interior
PLs (for lots
with 20+
spaces)
● Parking/vehicle
area (16-641)
● Landscape
fingers (16-641)
● Trees (for lots
with 20+)
● Min. 10 ft wide landscape strip
along city street
● Min. 5 ft wide side yard
● Landscape island/finger- every 10
spaces with 2 trees, 9 ft W x 20 ft L.
● Minimum 5% of area, exclusive
of any other required landscaped
area abutting a street or alley.
● Min. 1 tree for each 40’ property
line. ft frontage
Existing Development
9’- 7.5” along the streets
(legal nonconforming)
Additional landscaping
proposed along
Vineyard Avenue.

Yes.

22.8% of the lot.
12 trees provided.

Yes
d. Site Design, Circulation, and Parking: The Project parcel, is a corner lot, which is accessed from two existing driveways on RiverPark Boulevard. The proposed project will not alter the overall building location and site circulation. Circulation will still be provided in a “U” shape around the existing building. The driveway closest to the intersection of Vineyard Avenue and Riverpark Boulevard will be a “right turn in only” 555 107
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 7 of 11 ends

entrance, with the second driveway being a “right turn out only” exit. To minimize onsite conflicts the trash enclosure access is being moved from the parking lot to the alley, to allow for pick-up without impeding onsite circulation. Also, a new site wall is proposed along the north property line consistent with Oxnard City Code requirements for a screening wall between commercial zones and the Single Family Residential Zone, where they abut each other.

Due to the operational characteristics of existing Starbucks drive-through coffee shops operating in the City of Oxnard and beyond, City staff was concerned about traffic circulation both onsite and in the public right-of-way given the potential increase in the drive-through demand associated with the proposed Starbucks restaurant and inadequate vehicular queueing based on the existing configuration, which could collectively potentially interfere or block the adjacent street system and the intersection of North Vineyard Avenue/Riverpark Boulevard. As a result, the drive-through lane has been redesigned to run along the perimeter of the site, to allow for a longer queue. The current OCC requires a capacity of 8 spaces, however the current proposal provides for 16 spaces in the drive-through. Through the Development Advisory Committee process, multiple design alternatives were explored in coordination with various City departments, including Planning, Building and Engineering, Traffic, Fire, and Police. The currently proposed design was determined to best balance the onsite needs, while minimizing the potential for off-site impacts. The proposed design allowed for an increase in queueing capacity from 5 spaces to 16 spaces, without impacting onsite circulation. This will allow for emergency responders access at all times, even when the site is at full operation. The longer queue will also minimize the potential for the drive-through demand exceeding its capacity, which would impact the adjacent streets. However, while the 16-vehicle queue is not anticipated to be exceeded, a Draft Traffic Demand Management Plan (Attachment D), has been developed by the applicant team, and reviewed and accepted by City staff, which identifies both existing and future programs that can be implemented to prevent vehicles in the queue from spilling offsite. In addition to the standard operation items, some of the key component include:

1. Visibility and Exterior Camaras to allow for staff to monitor the drive-through lane.

2. Prior to capacity being reached, a Starbucks staff member will be tasked with directing cars to bypass the drive-through lane and either park, or leave the site to return when the adequate capacity has been restored.

3. Clear directional signage.

The existing site has a total of 41 parking spaces with a stacking credit of 5 spaces, for a total of 46 parking spaces. As a result of the improvements to the drive through lane onsite parking has been reduced to 20 spaces with a stacking credit of 15 spaces, for a total of 35.
556 108
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 8 of 11 ends

Table 2: Parking Compliance

DEVELOPMENT PARKING

REQUIREMENT PER

OXNARD CITY
CODE

SECTION
16-622(F)

STACKING

REQUIREMENT PER

OXNARD CITY
CODE

SECTION
16-647(D)
PARKING +

STACKING

PROVIDED

TOTAL PROVIDED
Existing Wendy’s Fast Food: 1
space per 50 gsf.
2450 gsf =49
spaces
8 Spaces 41 parking spaces
+ 5 stacking
spaces
46 spaces
Proposed
Starbuck
Fast Food: 1
space per 50 gsf.
2500 gsf =50
8 Spaces 20 parking spaces
+ 16 stacking
spaces
35 spaces
(Maximum of 15
spaces can count
toward parking
requirement)
OCC Section 16-651(B)(4) allows the Planning Commission to grant administrative relief from the parking provisions of the OCC when a requirement is shown to be excessive.

Pursuant to the OCC the applicant has provided a parking study prepared by a professional traffic engineer registered by the State, demonstrating that the required parking is excessive and showing the amount of parking that should be required for the proposed use (Attachment E). The study used parking counts from a Starbucks in Costa Mesa, which at the time was one of the company's highest grossing stores in Southern California, and thus represents the worst case scenario. Based on the assessment, “parking demand is typically 20 vehicles or less throughout the day, which can be readily accommodated by the proposed parking supply at the Project. During unusual peak times when more than 20 vehicles may wish to park at the Project Site, it is expected that this additional demand will be absorbed by the substantial capacity provided by the proposed enhanced drive-through lane (i.e., incoming motorists will choose to utilize the drive-through instead of walk-in service).”
Additionally, given the close proximity of two alternative Starbucks locations, both of which are located within approximately 0.5 miles of the proposed site, it is anticipated that demand will be distributed minimizing the peak demand at any individual location. A Transportation Demand Management Plan has been prepared and conditions of approval have also been incorporated to address parking issues, in the unlikely event that they may arise after the revised site configuration is constructed.

Lastly, the project is requesting to be allowed to provide 11 of the provided parking spaces as compact parking spaces. While standard size spaces are required to be 9 ft 557 109
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 9 of 11 ends

(width) x19 ft (length), compact parking spaces are required to have minimum dimensions of 8 ft (width) x16 ft (length). Ten of the proposed spaces are compact due to the width of the space being 5-inches short of the standard requirement of 9 ft in width.

The 11th compact space is compact due to the length of the spaces being approximately 1-foot short of the standard requirement of 19 ft long. Given that the spaces are only marginally short of the standard space requirements, they will still be able to safely accommodate most vehicles in the same manner as a standard space.

The City’s Traffic Engineer finds that the proposed project, as conditioned, and in the context of the documentation provided and reviewed demonstrate that there is sufficient vehicle queue and parking capacity. Therefore administrative relief from this provision is included within the MJMD application.
e) Building Design: The proposed changes include a small 50 square-foot addition to allow for the relocation of the drive-through pick-up window. The resulting building will be 2,500 square feet. The proposed restaurant building features a facade with contemporary stucco with new colors and materials which will consist of tan stucco and a bronze metal roof, with a weathered copper siding.
f) Landscaping: The Project will result in an overall increase in onsite landscaping, with the landscaping increasing from 22.8 percent of the site to 26.4 percent. The majority of the new landscaping will be installed along North Vineyard Avenue, a designated scenic corridor which requires a landscaped buffer of at least 30 feet. The existing parking lot is located within this 30-foot area and is considered to be a “legal nonconforming” existing condition. The drive-through queue will be located within this 30-foot paved area, but paved areas will be removed and additional landscaping is proposed to be installed on both linear sides of the drive-through queue within the 30-foot area. This new landscaping will bring the project site more into compliance with the General Plan’s 30-foot wide landscape buffer standard. The revised site landscaping will provide parkways and landscape areas throughout the parking lot that will feature low water use, native and regionally adapted plants including grasses, succulents, and trees.

Additionally, 8 trees will be added throughout the property, which will assist in meeting the requirement of 1 tree for every 40 feet of property line. g) Signage: As part of the original Special Use Permit (U-916) a sign program was approved to allow for the existing signage on site. The applicant is proposing to revise the onsite site signage. Per the OCC Section 16-608, the total aggregate sign area of advertising signs cannot exceed two square feet for each lineal foot of building on the principal street or one square foot of sign area for each lineal foot of lot frontage on the principal street, whichever is larger. Using North Vineyard Avenue, the maximum sign area for the site would be 175 square feet. The aggregate sign area includes all wall signs, both sides of the freestanding sign, and ground signs, which per the provided sign program total approximately 166 square feet, which is in compliance with the OCC 558 110
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 10 of 11 ends

(Attachment F).

Drive-through signage is considered separate from the advertising signage, and are part of the overall project approval, subject to review by the Planning Commission. The proposed menu board signage is provided in Attachment F. Given the potential increase in drive-through usage and the relocation of the menu board, a noise level analysis was provided for the proposed menu board equipment. Based on the study provided and the distance from the adjacent residential uses of approximately 50 feet, the proposed noise levels would not exceed the maximum allowable exterior noise levels for residential (50 dBA) or commercial (60 dBA) areas, pursuant to OCC Section 7-185 (Exterior Sound Standards).
7) Development Advisory Committee: The Project was reviewed by the Development Advisory Committee (DAC) on March 3, 2021 and May 26, 2021. Conditions of approval from DAC are included in the attached Resolution.
8) Community Workshop and Public Input: The Project site is located within the El Rio West Neighborhood. On July 19th, 2021, the Project was presented to the public during the City’s Community Workshop meeting. Notices were mailed out to property owners of the El Rio, El Rio West, and RiverPark neighborhoods. Approximately 3,200 meeting notices were mailed by the applicant, and the Project site was posted with Project details and Community Workshop information. During the meeting one comment was received by a member of the public regarding the Project. Prior to the meeting three comments were received in response to the Community Workshop notices. The primary concerns expressed were related to traffic and circulation. As discussed above, through the DAC process and subsequent reviews, City staff from Planning, Building and Engineering, Traffic, Fire and Police have reviewed both the site design and Traffic Demand Management Plan to ensure the project will not impede traffic on the adjacent streets. Also, as conditioned if it is determined the Traffic Demand Management Plan is not functioning as needed the City shall have the ability to re-evaluate and amend the plan as needed.

Consistent with public noticing requirements, the Planning Commission hearing was advertised in the newspaper, with an on-site posting, and by mail to property owners within 300 feet of the subject property. To date, Staff has not received any concerns or public comments regarding the proposed Project.
9) Appeal Procedure: In accordance with Section 16-545 of the City Code, the Planning Commission’s action on PZ 21-550-01 (MJMD) may be appealed to the City Council within 18 days after the decision date. Appeal forms may be obtained from the City Clerk and must be submitted with the appropriate fees before the end of the appeal period. If an appeal is not filed within 18 working days of the Planning Commission’s decision, the decision of the Planning Commission shall be considered final.
559 111
Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations; PZ No. 21-550-01 (MJMD) Planning Commission Hearing Date: October 21, 2021

Page 11 of 11 ends

Attachments:

A. Maps (Vicinity, General Plan, Zoning, Aerial)
B. Reduced Project Plans
C. Notice of Exemption
D. Transportation Demand Management Plan
E. Parking Assessment
F. Reduced Sign Plans
G. Draft Planning Commission Resolution Approving Planning and Zoning Permit Nos. 21-550-01 (Major Modification to U-916) , subject to certain findings and conditions.

H. Staff Presentation
560 112

ATTACHMENT
A
MAPS
(VICINITY, GENERAL PLAN, ZONING, AERIAL)
561 113

VINEYARD AVE

OLIVE ST
ALLEY
101

FWY NORTH

COLONIA AVE
V
E
N
T
U
RA
B
LV
D
101

FWY SOUTH

RIVERPARK BLVD
NB 101 ON RAMP
N
B 101 O
F
F
R
A
M
P

FINANCIAL SQ
D
A
N
U
B
E
WAY

SYCAMORE ST
SB 101 ON RAMP
ALLEY
NB 101 ON RAMP
C2PD
C2
CNTY
SPLAN
R1PD
R2PD
RH
Zoning/Specific Plan Map
Zoning/Specific Plan Map
0 50 100 200 300 400
Feet
June 15, 2021 1:2,500
Oxnard Planning
PZ 21-550-01
Location: 2551 N Vineyard Ave
APN:1320043215
Vineyard Starbucks Renovation
C2PD
562 114
CG
CR
RL
SCH
RLM
RM

VINEYARD AVE
ALLEY

OLIVE ST
V
E
N
T
U
RA
B
L
V
D

COLONIA AVE
101

FWY NORTH

RIVERPARK BLVD
NB 101 ON RAMP
101

FWY SOUTH

FINANCIAL SQ
NB 101 OFF
RAM
P
D
A
N
U
B
E
WAY
ALLEY
NB 101 ON RAMP
2030 General Plan Land Use Map
0 50 100 200
Feet
2030 General Plan Land Use Map
June 15, 2021 1:2,000
Oxnard Planning
CG
PZ 21-550-01
Location: 2551 N Vineyard Ave
APN:1320043215
Vineyard Starbucks Renovation
563 115

FIFTH ST H ST
C ST

VENTURA RD

OXNARD BLVD

RICE AVE

HUENEME RD
J ST

GONZALES RD

VINEYARD AVE

WOOLEY RD

BARD RD
101 FRWY

SAVIERS RD

DORIS AVE

CENTRAL AVE

ROSE AVE

CASPER RD

THIRD ST
23RD AVE

CAMINO DEL SOL
D ST

BRISTOL RD

ARNOLD RD

NINTH ST

OLIVAS PARK DR

WEST RD

NAUMAN RD

TEAL CLUB RD

PERIMETER RD

HARBOR BLVD

MARKET ST
G ST
OCEAN
DR
T
B ST RACK 13 RD

OLDS RD
32ND AVE

YUCCA ST

DEL NORTE BLVD

PATTERSON RD

CHANNEL ISLANDS BLVD

VICTORIA AVE
ELM ST

PERKINS RD

ETTING RD
F ST

PACIFIC AVE
5TH PL

PALMA DR
6TH ST

SANTA CLARA AVE
N ST

ENTRADA DR

CLARA ST

WALKER ST

WALNUT DR

BALBOA ST

DUNKIRK DR

SIMON WAY

ORANGE DR

STROUBE ST
5TH ST

EMERSON AVE

JOLIET PL
ALLEY

EBONY DR

KENTIA ST

HILL ST
I ST

SAN JUAN AVE

PATRICIA ST
A ST

VENTURA BLVD

EASTMAN AVE
TRACK 14 RD

REDWOOD ST GISLER AVE

FIR AVE
M ST

TERESA ST

PENINSULA RD

OFFSHORE ST

AZALEA ST

VICTORIA AV
11TH AVE

WILLIAMS DR

HARBOR SERVICE
BLVD
DONLON
ST

APPLE LN
LEI DR

STATHAM BLVD

LATIGO AVE

ARCTURUS AVE
K ST

BUTLER RD

ALBION DR

SURFSIDE DR

SWAN ST

NINA DR GARY DR

STURGIS RD

MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE
E ST

SAN MATEO PL

LAMBERT ST

SIKORSKY ST

JANETWOOD DR
ASH ST
DOCK 1

JOAN WAY

BEAUMONT AVE

PAVIN DR

NELSON PL

OXFORD DR

HOLLY AVE

VENICE RD WESTAR DR

MANDALAY
BEACH
RD

AVILA PL

BLANCA PL

VIEWPOINT DR

CAMINO AVE

BAYVIEW DR
ELBA
ST

SCOTT ST

OCEAN DR
B ST
M ST
ALLEY
ALLEY
101 FRWY

PATTERSON RD

VICTORIA AVE

CHANNEL ISLANDS BLVD

GONZALES RD

R CI E AVE
ALLEY

ETTING RD
F ST
C ST
HARBOR
BLVD
Vicinity Map
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
Miles
North
Pacific Ocean
N
June15, 2021
Oxnard Planning
1:70,000
Santa Clara River
PZ 21-550-01
Location: 2551 N Vineyard Ave
APN:1320043215
Vineyard Starbucks Renovation
Vicinity Map
PZ 21-550-01
564 116

N VINEYARD AVE

OLIVE ST

RIVERPARK BLVD

COLONIA AVE

VENTURA BLVD
NB 101 ON RAMP
Aerial Map
Aerial Map
June 15, 2021
Oxnard Planning
0 25 50 100 150 200
Feet
PZ 21-550-01
Location: 2551 N Vineyard Ave
APN:1320043215
Vineyard Starbucks Renovation
565 117

ATTACHMENT
B

REDUCED PROJECT PLANS
566 118
DATE:

ENCLOSURE
(E) ACCESSIBLE STALL
(E) ACCESSIBLE AISLE
(E) DRIVE THRU LANE
(E) MENU BOARD
(E) PREORDER MENU
(E) G.I
(E)SCE
XTMR
(E) LIGHT
(E) DIRECTIONAL SIGN
(E) DIRECTIONAL SIGN
(E) DRIVE THRU WINDOW
RIVERPARK BLVD.

E VINEYARD AVE
(E) PUBLIC SIDEWALK
(E) PROPERTY LINE
(E) LIGHT
(E) PYLON SIGN
(E) TRUNCATED DOME
(E) ELECTRCAL
CLOSET
(E) LIGHT
11' - 6"
(E) BOLLARDS
(E) BOLLARDS
(E) BOLLARDS
(E) BUILDING
2,400 SQFT
(E) CURB CUT
$OWRQ3NZ\6XLWH,UYLQH&$

3

)

DATE:

MCG PROJECT #:
© MCG ARCHITECTS 2018 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
NOTE: This information is conceptual in nature and is subject to adjustments pending further verification and Client, Tenant, and Governmental Agency approvals. No warranties or guaranties of any kind are given or implied by the Architect.

VICINITY MAP
EXISTING BUILDING SQFT: 2,400 SQFT
LOT SIZE: +/-0.66 ACRES

REQUIRED PARKING
EXISTING ZONE: C2PD
PARKING REQUIRED (1 PER 50 SQFT): 48 SPACES

EXISTING PARKING
EXISTING PARKING SPACES: 42 SPACES
DRIVE-THRU STACKING CREDIT (1 PER 23 LNFT): 105 LNFT / 23 = 5 TOTAL: 47

SITE SUMMARY
N
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2551 E. VINEYARD AVE.

OXNARD, CA 93036
APN: 132-0-043-214

SCOPE OF WORK

REPURPOSE AN EXISTING RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH DRIVE-THRU FOR A NEW TENANT. EXTERIOR MODIFICATIONS ARE DRIVE-THRU BUMP OUT AND WINDOW ADDITION (40 SQFT REMOVED/ 60 SQFT
ADDED) AND PAINT/FINISHES FOR REBRANDING. SITE MODIFICATIONS

INCLUDE ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL AND NEW CURB AT THE DT LANE. THERE IS NO CHANGE IN USE.

PROJECT SUMMARY
N

TURE REFERENCE

BUILDING

BUILDING INFORMATION

LOT SIZE

EXISTING PROPOSED
2,400 SQFT (8.3%)
+/-0.66 ACRES(+/-28,750 SQFT)
2,500 SQFT (8.7%)
PAVING 19,796.4 SQFT (68.9%) 18,832 SQFT (65.5%)
LANDSCAPE 6,553.6 SQFT (22.8%) 7,418 SQFT (25.8%)

BUILDING HEIGHT
PARKING 47 36
21FT
- DEMO 40 SQFT ADDITION 60 SQFT
<

W >
Z
55 6'.
55 (N) TRASH

ENCLOSURE
RIVERPARK BLVD.

E VINEYARD AVE
(E) PYLON SIGN,

REPAINTED WITH (N)

SIGNAGE PANELS
(E) LANDSCAPE (E) PUBLIC SIDEWALK
7 (E) LANDSCAPE
(E) SCE
XTMR
(E) BOLLARDS
(E) LANDSCAPING
(E) PARKING SURFACE -

GRIND & REPAIR AS NEEDED
(N) PLANTER/

LANDSCAPING
(N) SITE LIGHT
(N) LANDSCAPE
(E) PARKING SURFACE -

GRIND & REPAIR AS NEEDED
(E) LANDSCAPE
(E) LANDSCAPE
(N) EXIT ONLY/ THANK

YOU SIGNAGE
(E) PROPERTY LINE (N) BUMP OUT WITH
(N) DRIVE-THRU WINDOW
(N) DRIVE THRU LANE
(N) DRIVE THRU LANE
10 3
(N) ACCESSIBLE STALL, TYP
(N) ACCESSIBLE AISLE
(N) CURB CUT -

REPAIR AS NEEDED
(E) ELECTRICAL

SWITCHGEAR
(N) MENU BOARD
(N) DIGITAL ORDER
SCREEN
(N) BOLLARD
(N) PRE-MENU BOARD
(N) BOLLARD
(E) G.I. TO BE

MODIFIED/REPLACED TO

INCLUDE A SAMPLE BOX
(E) DOOR, TYP
(N) AWNING, ABOVE
(N) AWNING, ABOVE
(N) STOP SIGNAGE
TYP.
20' - 0"
(E) BUILDING WITH
(N) COFFEE SHOP TENANT
2,500 SQFT
(N) COMPACT PARKING STALL -

REPAINT STRIPING AS NEEDED
(N) STANDARD PARKING

STALL - REPAINT STRIPING

AS NEEDED

CURBSIDE PICKUP

PARKING STALLS
(N) ACCESSIBLE STALL
(E) CURB CUT
(N) ACCESSIBLE

SIGNAGE, TYP
(N) 8" WALL 6FT HEIGHT MIN. (N) 8" WALL 6FT HEIGHT MIN. (E) PUBLIC SIDEWALK
(E) BUS STOP

WITH BENCH,

TRASH BIN,

AND BIKE
RACK.
(N) 8" WALL

MOP PARKNG STALLS
(N) DIRECTIONAL SIGN

MOBILE ORDER

PICKUP SIGNAGE
(E) MEDIAN
(E) PEDSTRIAN

CROSSWALK

STRIPING

SETBACK
10' - 0" MIN.
(N) PAINTED DRIVETHRU STRIP
(N) SITE LIGHT
(N) SITE LIGHT
0 20' 30'
Scale: 1" = 10'-0"
10'
(N) DIRECTIONAL

SIGNAGE
(N) ONE WAY SIGNAGE
(N) BIKE RACK
(N) BOLLARD
DN
(N) SITE LIGHT
(N) SITE LIGHT
$OWRQ3NZ\6XLWH,UYLQH&$

3

)

DATE:

CITY OF OXNARD

PROPOSED SITE PLAN
PROPOSED BUILDING SQFT: 2,500 SQFT
GROSS LAND: +/-0.66 ACRES
+/-28,750 SQFT
LAND COVERAGE:

BUILDING: 8.7%(2,500 SQFT)
PAVING: 65.5%(18,832 SQFT)
LANDSCAPE: 25.8%(7,418 SQFT)

REQUIRED PARKING
EXISTING ZONE: C2PD
PARKING REQUIRED (1 PER 50 SQFT): 48 SPACES

EXISTING PARKING
EXISTING PARKING SPACES: 42 SPACES
DRIVE-THRU STACKING CREDIT (1 PER 23 LNFT): 105 LNFT / 23 = 5 TOTAL: 47

PROPOSED PARKING
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: 20 SPACES
DRIVE-THRU STACKING CREDIT (1 PER 23 LNFT): 368 LNFT / 23 = 16 TOTAL: 36
PROPOSED BIKE RACK: 6 SPACES
N

SITE SUMMARY
N

TRUE REFERENCE
NOTE: THE DELIVERY TIME IS 4AM AND THE LOADING
VEHICLE WILL USE ONE STANDARD PARKING SPACE.

BUILDING

BUILDING INFORMATION

LOT SIZE

EXISTING PROPOSED
2,450 SQFT (8.5%)
+/-0.66 ACRES(+/-28,750 SQFT)
2,500 SQFT (8.7%)
PAVING 19,755.4 SQFT (68.7%) 18,669 SQFT (64.9%)
LANDSCAPE 6,553.6 SQFT (22.8%) 7,581 SQFT (26.4%)

BUILDING HEIGHT
PARKING 47 36
21FT
- DEMO 40 SQFT ADDITION 90 SQFT
<

W >
Z
55 6'.
55 (N) TRASH

ENCLOSURE
RIVERPARK BLVD.

E VINEYARD AVE
(E) PYLON SIGN,

REPAINTED WITH (N)

SIGNAGE PANELS
(E) LANDSCAPE (E) PUBLIC SIDEWALK
7 (E) LANDSCAPE
(E) SCE
XTMR
(E) BOLLARDS
(E) LANDSCAPING
(E) PARKING SURFACE -

GRIND & REPAIR AS NEEDED
(N) PLANTER/

LANDSCAPING
(N) SITE LIGHT
(N) LANDSCAPE
(E) PARKING SURFACE -

GRIND & REPAIR AS NEEDED
(E) LANDSCAPE
(E) LANDSCAPE
(N) EXIT ONLY/ THANK

YOU SIGNAGE
(E) PROPERTY LINE (N) BUMP OUT WITH
(N) DRIVE-THRU WINDOW
(N) DRIVE THRU LANE
(N) DRIVE THRU LANE
10 3
(N) ACCESSIBLE STALL, TYP
(N) ACCESSIBLE AISLE
(N) CURB CUT -

REPAIR AS NEEDED
(E) ELECTRICAL

SWITCHGEAR
(N) MENU BOARD
(N) DIGITAL ORDER
SCREEN
(N) BOLLARD
(N) PRE-MENU BOARD
(N) BOLLARD
(E) G.I. TO BE

MODIFIED/REPLACED TO

INCLUDE A SAMPLE BOX
(E) DOOR, TYP
(N) AWNING, ABOVE
(N) AWNING, ABOVE
(N) STOP SIGNAGE
TYP.
20' - 0"
(E) BUILDING WITH
(N) COFFEE SHOP TENANT
2,500 SQFT
(N) COMPACT PARKING STALL -

REPAINT STRIPING AS NEEDED
(N) STANDARD PARKING

STALL - REPAINT STRIPING

AS NEEDED

CURBSIDE PICKUP

PARKING STALLS
(N) ACCESSIBLE STALL
(E) CURB CUT
(N) ACCESSIBLE

SIGNAGE, TYP
(N) 8" WALL 6FT HEIGHT MIN. (N) 8" WALL 6FT HEIGHT MIN. (E) PUBLIC SIDEWALK
(E) BUS STOP

WITH BENCH,

TRASH BIN,

AND BIKE
RACK.
(N) 8" WALL

MOP PARKNG STALLS
(N) DIRECTIONAL SIGN

MOBILE ORDER

PICKUP SIGNAGE
(E) MEDIAN
(E) PEDSTRIAN

CROSSWALK

STRIPING

SETBACK
10' - 0" MIN.
(N) PAINTED DRIVETHRU STRIP
(N) SITE LIGHT
(N) SITE LIGHT
0 20' 30'
Scale: 1" = 10'-0"
10'
(N) DIRECTIONAL

SIGNAGE
(N) ONE WAY SIGNAGE
(N) BIKE RACK
(N) BOLLARD
DN
(N) SITE LIGHT
(N) SITE LIGHT
$OWRQ3NZ\6XLWH,UYLQH&$

3

)

DATE:

CITY OF OXNARD

PROPOSED SITE PLAN
PROPOSED BUILDING SQFT: 2,500 SQFT
GROSS LAND: +/-0.66 ACRES
+/-28,750 SQFT
LAND COVERAGE:

BUILDING: 8.7%(2,500 SQFT)
PAVING: 65.5%(18,832 SQFT)
LANDSCAPE: 25.8%(7,418 SQFT)

REQUIRED PARKING
EXISTING ZONE: C2PD
PARKING REQUIRED (1 PER 50 SQFT): 48 SPACES

EXISTING PARKING
EXISTING PARKING SPACES: 42 SPACES
DRIVE-THRU STACKING CREDIT (1 PER 23 LNFT): 105 LNFT / 23 = 5 TOTAL: 47

PROPOSED PARKING
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: 20 SPACES
DRIVE-THRU STACKING CREDIT (1 PER 23 LNFT): 368 LNFT / 23 = 16 TOTAL: 36
PROPOSED BIKE RACK: 6 SPACES
N

SITE SUMMARY
N

TRUE REFERENCE
NOTE: THE DELIVERY TIME IS 4AM AND THE LOADING
VEHICLE WILL USE ONE STANDARD PARKING SPACE.

BUILDING

BUILDING INFORMATION

LOT SIZE

EXISTING PROPOSED
2,450 SQFT (8.5%)
+/-0.66 ACRES(+/-28,750 SQFT)
2,500 SQFT (8.7%)
PAVING 19,755.4 SQFT (68.7%) 18,669 SQFT (64.9%)
LANDSCAPE 6,553.6 SQFT (22.8%) 7,581 SQFT (26.4%)

BUILDING HEIGHT
PARKING 47 36
21FT
- DEMO 40 SQFT ADDITION 90 SQFT
2,450 SQFT
49 35
2,450
568 120
DATE:

W >
Z
55 6'.
55 (N) TRASH

ENCLOSURE
RIVERPARK BLVD.

E VINEYARD AVE
(E) PYLON SIGN,

REPAINTED WITH (N)

SIGNAGE PANELS
(E) LANDSCAPE (E) PUBLIC SIDEWALK
7 (E) LANDSCAPE
(E) SCE
XTMR
(E) BOLLARDS
(E) LANDSCAPING
(E) PARKING SURFACE -

GRIND & REPAIR AS NEEDED
(N) PLANTER/

LANDSCAPING
(N) SITE LIGHT
(N) LANDSCAPE
(E) PARKING SURFACE -

GRIND & REPAIR AS NEEDED
(E) LANDSCAPE
(E) LANDSCAPE
(N) EXIT ONLY/ THANK

YOU SIGNAGE
(E) PROPERTY LINE (N) BUMP OUT WITH
(N) DRIVE-THRU WINDOW
(N) DRIVE THRU LANE
(N) DRIVE THRU LANE
10 3
(N) ACCESSIBLE STALL, TYP
(N) ACCESSIBLE AISLE
(N) CURB CUT -

REPAIR AS NEEDED
(E) ELECTRICAL

SWITCHGEAR
(N) MENU BOARD
(N) DIGITAL ORDER
SCREEN
(N) BOLLARD
(N) PRE-MENU BOARD
(N) BOLLARD
(E) G.I. TO BE

MODIFIED/REPLACED TO

INCLUDE A SAMPLE BOX
(E) DOOR, TYP
(N) AWNING, ABOVE
(N) AWNING, ABOVE
(N) STOP SIGNAGE
TYP.
20' - 0"
(E) BUILDING WITH
(N) COFFEE SHOP TENANT
2,500 SQFT
(N) COMPACT PARKING STALL -

REPAINT STRIPING AS NEEDED
(N) STANDARD PARKING

STALL - REPAINT STRIPING

AS NEEDED

CURBSIDE PICKUP

PARKING STALLS
(N) ACCESSIBLE STALL
(E) CURB CUT
(N) ACCESSIBLE

SIGNAGE, TYP
(N) 8" WALL 6FT HEIGHT MIN. (N) 8" WALL 6FT HEIGHT MIN. (E) PUBLIC SIDEWALK
(E) BUS STOP

WITH BENCH,

TRASH BIN,

AND BIKE
RACK.
(N) 8" WALL

MOP PARKNG STALLS
(N) DIRECTIONAL SIGN

MOBILE ORDER

PICKUP SIGNAGE
(E) MEDIAN
(E) PEDSTRIAN

CROSSWALK

STRIPING

SETBACK
10' - 0" MIN.
(N) PAINTED DRIVETHRU STRIP
(N) SITE LIGHT
(N) SITE LIGHT
0 20' 30'
Scale: 1" = 10'-0"
10'
(N) DIRECTIONAL

SIGNAGE
(N) ONE WAY SIGNAGE
(N) BIKE RACK
(N) BOLLARD
DN
(N) SITE LIGHT
(N) SITE LIGHT
$OWRQ3NZ\6XLWH,UYLQH&$

3

)

DATE:

CITY OF OXNARD

PROPOSED SITE PLAN
PROPOSED BUILDING SQFT: 2,500 SQFT
GROSS LAND: +/-0.66 ACRES
+/-28,750 SQFT
LAND COVERAGE:

BUILDING: 8.7%(2,500 SQFT)
PAVING: 65.5%(18,832 SQFT)
LANDSCAPE: 25.8%(7,418 SQFT)

REQUIRED PARKING
EXISTING ZONE: C2PD
PARKING REQUIRED (1 PER 50 SQFT): 48 SPACES

EXISTING PARKING
EXISTING PARKING SPACES: 42 SPACES
DRIVE-THRU STACKING CREDIT (1 PER 23 LNFT): 105 LNFT / 23 = 5 TOTAL: 47

PROPOSED PARKING
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: 20 SPACES
DRIVE-THRU STACKING CREDIT (1 PER 23 LNFT): 368 LNFT / 23 = 16 TOTAL: 36
PROPOSED BIKE RACK: 6 SPACES
N

SITE SUMMARY
N

TRUE REFERENCE
NOTE: THE DELIVERY TIME IS 4AM AND THE LOADING
VEHICLE WILL USE ONE STANDARD PARKING SPACE.

BUILDING

BUILDING INFORMATION

LOT SIZE

EXISTING PROPOSED
2,450 SQFT (8.5%)
+/-0.66 ACRES(+/-28,750 SQFT)
2,500 SQFT (8.7%)
PAVING 19,755.4 SQFT (68.7%) 18,669 SQFT (64.9%)
LANDSCAPE 6,553.6 SQFT (22.8%) 7,581 SQFT (26.4%)

BUILDING HEIGHT
PARKING 47 36
21FT
- DEMO 40 SQFT ADDITION 90 SQFT
49 35
15 35
345
569 121
DATE:

W >
Z
55 6'.
55 RIVERPARK BLVD.

E VINEYARD AVE
(E) BUILDING WITH
(N) COFFEE SHOP TENANT
2,400 SQFT
12' - 0"

BUILDING SETBACK
54' - 10 1/2"

BUILDING SETBACK
81' - 1"

BUILDING SETBACK
15' - 2"
30' - 6 1/2"
71' - 9"
TYP.
22' - 10"
TYP.
9' - 0"
TYP.
20' - 2"
TYP.
8' - 7"
TYP.
9' - 0"
12' - 4" 17' - 1"
OVERALL PLANTER DIM.
109' - 10"
12' - 0"
12' - 0"
26' - 0"
26' - 0"
3' - 6"
33' - 0"
18' - 2"
62' - 5 1/2"
74' - 0"
69' - 3"
5' - 10"
7' - 1"
5' - 2"
175' - 0" (PROPERTY LINE)
164' - 3" P( ROPERTY LINE)
12' - 2"
30' - 0" TO ADJACENT STREET O.C.
25' - 0" 18' - 1"
21' - 7"
10' - 0"
3' - 0" 31' - 6"
SEE DETAIL 1
12' - 0"

E( ) LANDSCAPE
9' - 7 1/2"
30' - 7 1/2"
20' - 0"
0 20' 30'
Scale: 1" = 10'-0"
10'
6' - 6"
76' - 7"
DN
4' - 8" 19' - 4"
10' - 4 1/2"
5' - 1 1/2"
6' - 0"
65°
20' - 1 1/2"
8' - 7" (8' - 6" MIN.)
9' - 5" (9' - 4 1/2" MIN.) 8' - 2 1/2" ( 8' - 2 1/2"MIN.) 36' - 10 1/2" (33' - 6" MIN.)
18' - 5 1/2" (16' - 0" MIN.)
16' - 1 1/2" (15' - 6" MIN.)
$OWRQ3NZ\6XLWH,UYLQH&$

3

)

DATE:

TRUE REFERENCE
Scale: 1 : 60 1 ENLARGED ANGLED PARKING STALL
2,500 SQFT
570 122
DATE:

BEVERAGE
PREP
657 SF

SALES/RETAIL
112 SF

GENERAL

SEATING
103 SF

GENERAL

SEATING
161 SF

GENERAL

SEATING
93 SF

GENERAL

SEATING
53 SF

GENERAL

SEATING
518 SF

WORKROOM

FIXSED SEATING
8' - 4"
3' - 1 1/2"

FIXSED SEATING
6' - 11 1/2"
112 SF

RESTROOM
88 SF

RESTROOM

MAIN ENTRANCE

WORKROOM

ENTRANCE

EMPLOYEE ONLY

BEVERAGE PREP

GENERAL SEATING

SALES/RETAIL

WORKROOM

RESTROOM
DIM. FIXED SEATING
N

ROOM SCHEDULE LEGEND

NAME AREA
BEVERAGE PREP 202 SF
GENERAL SEATING 522 SF
RESTROOM 199 SF
SALES/RETAIL 657 SF
WORKROOM 518 SF
GRAND TOTAL 2098 SF
N

TRUE REFERENCE
571 123
DATE:

EXTERIOR

LIGHTING
SW6141
SOFTER TAN
METAL ROOF
MEDIUM BRONZE
METAL ROOF
MEDIUM BRONZE
METAL ROOF
MEDIUM BRONZE
METAL ROOF
MEDIUM BRONZE
METAL ROOF
MEDIUM BRONZE
METAL ROOF
MEDIUM BRONZE
METAL SIDING
WEATHERED COPPER
METAL SIDING
WEATHERED COPPER
(N) RTU
[SCREENED]
(N) RTU
[SCREENED]
(N) RTU
[SCREENED]
(N) RTU
[SCREENED]
WALL CABLE

TRELLIS

EXTERIOR

LIGHTING
(N) RTU
[SCREENED]
(N) RTU
[SCREENED]
(N) RTU
[SCREENED]
(N) RTU
[SCREENED]
WALL CABLE

TRELLIS
572 124
DATE:

TRUE REFERENCE
575 127
DATE:

MCG JOB #:
07/01/21
20006.30
DATE: REVISIONS
© MCG ARCHITECTURE 2019 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
NOTE: This information is conceptual in nature and is subject to DGMXVWPHQWVSHQGLQJIXUWKHUYHUL¿FDWLRQDORQJZLWK&OLHQW7HQDQWDQG *RYHUQLQJ$JHQF\DSSURYDOV1RZDUUDQWLHVRUJXDUDQWLHVRIDQ\NLQG are given or implied by the Architect.
15635 Alton Pkwy, Suite 100
Irvine, California 92618
949.553.1117 949.474.7056
www.mcgarchitecture.com
T F
FACADE REMODEL
2551 E. VINEYARD AVE.
2;1$5'&$

PROPOSED SIGNAGE & BIKE RACK DETAIL
Painted black to match
RAL 7021M - match sample
.090" [2mm] routed aluminum
face panel painted black
to match RAL 7021M -
match sample
open
CS 3x1.60 aluminum channel
painted black to match
RAL 7021M - match sample
.063" [2mm] aluminum base
cover painted black to match
RAL 7021M - match sample
Street Side View Front Elevation View Store Side View Rear Elevation View 2'-2" [660mm] 5 3/16"
[132mm]
3'-10" [1168mm]
8 7/8"
[225mm]
1'-3" [381mm]
7" [178mm]
11 7/8"
[302mm]
1'-5 5/8" [448mm]
1'-5 3/16" [437mm] 3" [76mm]
3/8" typ. [10mm]
7 1/8"
[181mm]
2'-3" [686mm] 4" [102mm]
End cap panel 2-tone
Chevron end only
Weatherproof
disconnect switch
with sealing boot
Copy and chevrons backed
up with .125" [3mm] white
solar grade polycarbonate
matching R&H #7328
Painted black to match
RAL 7021M - match sample
.090" [2mm] routed aluminum
face panel painted black
to match RAL 7021M -
match sample
Copy backed up with .125" [3mm]
white solar grade polycarbonate
open matching R&H #7328 Weatherproof
disconnect switch
with sealing boot
CS 3x1.60 aluminum channel
painted black to match
RAL 7021M - match sample
.063" [2mm] aluminum base
cover painted black to match
RAL 7021M - match sample
Street Side View Front Elevation View Store Side View Rear Elevation View 2'-1" [635mm] 1'-8 5/16" [516mm] 5 3/16"
[132mm]
3'-10" [1168mm]
1'-3" [381mm] 2'-3" [686mm] 4" [102mm]
6 11/16" [170mm]6 11/16" [170mm]
1'-2 5/8"
[371mm] 8 15/16"[227mm] 10 13/16" [275mm]
3 1/2" 2 1/2"
[89mm] [64mm]
1'-5 5/8" [448mm] 7 1/8"
[181mm]
3/8" typ. [10mm]
1'-5 3/16" [437mm] 3" [76mm]
Front View
Scale: 3"=1'-0" 1 Side ViewScale: 3"=1'-0" 2
3 Panels are .080" routed aluminum with 1/2" radius corners.

Manufacture two-hundred (200) single face parking signs.

Color Pallete
PMS 3425C PMS 560C
AA
B
1 1/2" 1 1/2" 2 7/8" 2" 3/4"
1'-6"
1'-0"
.080"
Face to have applied digitally printed vinyl graphics on white reflective vinyl, See color detail.

C 5/16” White reflective border.
5/16"
A
B
C
A
B
C
DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE EXIT ONLY/THANK YOU SIGNAGE CLEARANCE BAR PRE-MENU BOARD DIGITAL ORDER SCREEN 5-PANEL MENU BOARD MOBILE ORDER PICKUP SIGNAGE ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE STOP SIGNAGE ENTRANCE SIGNAGE BIKE RACK DETAIL 576 128
DATE:

ON REGIONAL

VARIES - BASED

REQUIREMENTS
METAL ROOF;

FINISH TO MATCH

BUILDING CANOPY
2" CMU CAP (TYP.)
CMU WALL SECTION CMU WALL ELEVATION
SMOOTH CONCRETE
BLOCK PAINTED
SW7031 MEGA CREIGE
BOSTON IVY
7 7
(N) CMU WALL
8' - 0"
(E) ALLEY (E) LANDSCAPE PARKING
(E) CURB

PLEASE SEE CIVIL DRAWING
FOR MORE INFORMATION. PLEASE SEE CIVIL DRAWING
FOR MORE INFORMATION.
10’-4” X 19’-4” TRASH ENCLOSURE WILL BE
PROVIDED TO ACCOMMODATE DOUBLE 4
YARD DUMPSTERS AND DOUBLE 64 GALLON
TOTES.
577 129
DATE:

PAINTED
METAL SIDING
WEATHERED COPPER
WALL CABLE TRELLIS WITH
PLANT BASE
STANDING SEAM ROOF
MEDIUM BRONZE
578 130

ATTACHMENT
D

TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN
579 131
Transportation Demand Management Plan
Prepared for: The City of Oxnard
Prepared by: MCG Architecture
Revised: June 21, 2021
Per the U.S. Department of Transportation, transportation demand management (TDM), or simply demand management, is defined a set of strategies aimed at maximizing traveler choices. The following are several performance-based approaches that Starbucks employs nationwide to provide customers with the maximum number of choices to make purchases from a store, while mitigating the impacts to regular traffic flow.

1. Intentional Site Selection
a. Careful consideration is given to each site to ensure customers will have many convenient options for transportation. This particular site is directly adjacent to a bus stop, providing a ride share option. It is also within walking distance of both single and multi-family developments as well as the Martinez & Vineyard Shopping Centers. b. These items are indicated on the Site Plan attached by numbers ①.

2. Effective Site Planning & Data-Driven Menu Board Placement a. For this project, Starbucks engaged with MCG Architecture for over a year to determine the most efficient site plan design given the constraints of this existing site. Countless iterations focused balancing parking requirements with drive-thru stacking length.

Particular attention was given to traffic flow and safety. b. Through its many drive-thru locations already in operation, Starbucks has gathered extensive data on the most efficient placement of the menu board so that the flow of customers is steady. After customers place their order, they proceed to the pick-up window where their drink is simultaneously ready. Every effort is made to reduce waiting time at any given point.

3. “Mobile Order & Pay” or MOP
a. Starbucks launched “Mobile Order & Pay” in 2015, combining the company’s existing payment system with new online ordering features that let you order ahead for pickup at stores. According to an earnings document published on Oct. 1, 2020, almost a quarter of all transactions (24%) at Starbucks stores in the US are mobile orders through the company’s app.1,2
b. How it works: Customers place their orders (including payment) ahead of time using the Starbucks Mobile App. When the customer arrives at the store, they will find their order is ready for them to pick up on the counter.
c. The MOP program relieves orders placed in the drive-thru lane and customers are in and out of parking stalls within a few minutes at most.
d. Designated parking stalls for this program are indicated on the Site Plan attached by number ②.
580 132

4. Curbside Pick-up
a. Starbucks’ customers have evolved an increased desire for flexibility and convenience.

In response, Starbucks added Curbside Pick-up options to many locations to further increase the efficiency of the “Mobile Order & Pay” program by bringing offerings out to the car rather than requiring the customer to enter the store. b. How it works: Customers place their orders (including payment) ahead of time using the Starbucks Mobile App. When a customer arrives at the store, they are able to check in using the same app and note which spot they are parked in. Starbucks Partners are alerted to the customer’s arrival and bring the order directly out to the car. c. The Curbside Pick-up program relieves orders placed in the drive-thru lane and customers are in and out of parking stalls within a few minutes at most. d. Designated parking stalls for this program are indicated on the Site Plan attached by number ③.

5. Delivery in partnership with UberEats
a. With customers shifting preferences towards delivery rather than dining-in, Starbucks has partnered with UberEats to introduce a new choice for customer convenience. b. How it works: Customers place their orders through the UberEats app. Orders are prepared similar to the “Mobile Order & Pay” and Curbside Pick-up programs. A delivery driver, designated by UberEats, picks up the order(s) and delivers it/them to the customer.
c. The Delivery program relieves orders placed in the drive-thru lane and the parking lot. It is possible for multiple orders to be picked up at once. Delivery drivers are in and out of parking stalls within a few minutes at most.
d. There are no specific designated parking stalls for this program, however, delivery drivers are eligible to use the “Mobile Order & Pay” designated stalls, indicated on the Site Plan attached by number ②.

6. Flexible or Hand-Held Order Point(s)
a. A new program, which is currently being developed and tested at select locations, allows for orders and payment to be taken ahead of the fixed Order Point. The feedback from this pilot program will aid the company in determining its effectiveness and most impactful times for deployment.
b. How it works: The Handheld Order Point will be used to take orders earlier, allowing labels to be printed earlier and potentially providing more time to prepare orders, when necessary as determined by the store’s operators.
c. Starbucks is currently assessing stores that are good candidates for this trial program. d. The potential location of this kiosk is indicated on the attached Site Plan by number ④. 1 ‘Starbucks Mobile Order & Pay Now Available to Customers Nationwide’ 2015, Stories.Starbucks.com, 22 September 2015, Accessed 22 April 2021 <https://stories.starbucks.com/stories/2015/starbucks-mobile-order-pay-now-available-to-customers-nationwide/> 2Campbell, Ian 2020 ‘Starbucks says nearly a quarter of all US retail orders are placed from a phone’, The Verge, 30 October 2020, Accessed 21 April 2021 https://www.theverge.com/2020/10/30/21540908/starbucks-app-q4-earnings-mobile-payments 581 133
Site Specific Performance-Based Measures & Mitigation
A. Visibility & Exterior Cameras
a. The Site Plan for Starbucks at Vineyard & Riverpark is designed with a direct line-ofsight from the Starbucks partner at the point of sale to the 15th & 16th cars in the drive-thru lane. This will allow the partner to observe and monitor the traffic flow throughout the day. See Site Plan number ⑤.
b. At least one (1) exterior camera will be mounted to face the drive-thru lane. This will also allow partners in the Back of House and the Store Manager to observe the flow as a second set of eyes. See Site Plan number ⑥.

B. Signage & Directional Markings
a. Directional arrows shall be placed on the pavement at the entry drive aisle to clearly define thru-traffic from drive-thru traffic. See Site Plan number ⑦. b. Additional pole-mounted signage will be placed at the entry to the site indicating that cars should not overflow onto the street and block traffic. See Site Plan number ⑧.

C. Partner-Guided Traffic Flow
a. Should the traffic exceed the capacity of the drive-thru lane and if it is safe to do so, a Starbucks partner may be tasked with directing cars to bypass the drive-thru lane and either park, or leave the site to return when the traffic backup is mitigated. See Site Plan number ⑨.

D. Example Decision-Making Metrics
a. Starbucks partners and the Store Manager will have the ability to implement and modify this plan based on observed performance metrics as follows:
i. 0-7 cars observed in lane: No action; typical traffic flow ii. 8-11 cars observed in lane: Observations are vocally shared with all partners to increase efficiency where possible.
iii. 12-15 cars observed in lane: Store Manager is aware of the situation and designates an available partner to prepare to direct traffic, if needed; Store Manager deploys traffic mitigation methods including but not limited to those discussed in this TDM plan.
iv. 16+ cars observed: Store Manager deploys designated partner to direct traffic on-site.
582 134

KEEP CLEAR
SS
TEL
RIVERPARK BLVD.

E VINEYARD AVE

MOBILE ORDER PICKUP SIGNAGE

CURBSIDE PICKUP SIGNAGE

CONCEPTUAL LOCATION FOR HAND-HELD ORDER POINT

MOBILE ORDER
& PAY CURBSIDE
(E) BUS STOP WITH

BENCH, TRASH BIN,
AND BIKE RACK.
2 3
4 1
5 6
8 7
9 0-7 CARS
8-11 CARS
12-15 CARS
DN
15635 Alton Parkway, Suite 100, Irvine, CA 92618
P: 949.553.1117 F: 949.474.7056
DATE:MCG PROJECT #:© MCG ARCHITECTS 2018 ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDNOTE: This information is conceptual in nature and is subject toadjustments pending further verification and Client, Tenant, andGovernmental Agency approvals. No warranties or guarantiesof any kind are given or implied by the Architect. 07/01/21
20006.30
HAND-HELD ORDER POINTSITE 1
4 TRAFFIC DEMAND MANAGEMENT PLAN
583 135

ATTACHMENT
E

PARKING ASSESSMENT
584 136

MEMORANDUM
O:\0539\memo\Parking Assessment - 2551 E. Vineyard SBUX (10.07.21).docx To: John Schmid
MCG Architecture
Date: October 7, 2021
From: David S. Shender
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
LLG Ref: 5-21-0539-1
Subject: Parking Assessment for the Proposed Starbucks Coffee Shop at 2551 East Vineyard Avenue in the City of Oxnard
This parking assessment has been prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) for the proposed Starbucks coffee shop (the “Project”) at 2551 East Vineyard Avenue (the “Project Site”) in the City of Oxnard. The Project Site is located at the northwest corner of the Vineyard Avenue/Riverpark Boulevard intersection. LLG understands the Project proposes to provide a supply of on-site vehicle parking that is less than what would otherwise be required based on the City of Oxnard Municipal Code. Thus, the purpose of this memorandum is to provide an assessment as to whether the proposed supply of parking spaces would adequately serve the expected peak parking demand generated by the proposed Starbucks.

Project Description
The Project Site is currently occupied by a Wendy’s drive-through restaurant providing 2,450 square feet of building floor area, as well as an existing drivethrough lane and vehicle parking. LLG understand the Project proposes to remodel the Project Site to accommodate a Starbucks coffee shop with drive-through service.

The Project site plan is provided on Figure 1 attached to this memorandum. The building size is proposed to increase slightly to 2,500 square feet in size. In addition, the existing drive-through lane and parking area will be reconfigured so as to increase the vehicle stacking capacity within the drive-through lane. As shown on Figure 1, the Project Site will provide 20 vehicle parking spaces and the reconfigured drivethrough lane will accommodate 15 queued vehicles. In addition, six bicycle parking spaces will be provided on-site.

Code Parking
Section 16-622 within the City of Oxnard Municipal Codes provides the off-street parking requirements for various land uses, including restaurants with drive-through services. Subsection (F) of Section 16-622 provides the following off-street parking requirements applicable to the Project:
 One parking space per 50 square feet of gross (building) floor area; and

585 137
John Schmid
October 7, 2021

Page 2 ends

O:\0539\memo\Parking Assessment - 2551 E. Vineyard SBUX (10.07.21).docx  Stacking credit in drive through lane may count toward the required parking at basis of one auto per 23 lineal feet of striped stacking line. A maximum credit not to exceed 30 percent of total requirement or no more than 20 spaces may be applied for stacking, whichever is less.

Table 1 below provides the Code parking analysis for the Project.

Table 1
Code Parking Analysis
Project Feature Code Parking
Requirement Project Site Required Parking
Starbucks Building 1 space/50 s.f. 2,500 s.f. 50 spaces Drive-Through
Lane
Credit of 1 space
per 23 lineal feet of
vehicle stacking [a]
345 feet of drivethrough lane stacking (15) spaces
Total 35 spaces
[a] City Code limits drive-through lane parking credit to 30% of required parking (i.e., 15 spaces for this Project) or 20 spaces, whichever is less.

As previously noted, the Project proposes to provide 20 vehicle parking spaces, which is less than the Code requirement for 35 parking spaces. Thus, additional review has been conducted to assess whether the Project’s proposed supply of 20 parking spaces will adequately accommodate the forecast parking demand generated by the Project.

Starbucks Parking Demand Data
Parking demand data related to Starbucks was reviewed for purposes of assessing the adequacy of the proposed on-site parking supply at the Project Site. In March 2013, LLG collected parking demand data at an existing Starbucks coffee shop located at 450 East 17th Street in the City of Costa Mesa (the “Costa Mesa Starbucks”). The Costa Mesa Starbucks provides 2,356 square feet of building floor area, which is similar to the Project (2,500 square feet). In addition, the Costa Mesa Starbucks provides a drive-through lane, as well as vehicle parking for walk-in service. While the vehicle parking supply at the Costa Mesa Starbucks (35 spaces) is greater than the proposed Project Site, the capacity of the drive-through lane is less (accommodating approximately 10 cars) when compared to the Project. It is noted that at the time the parking counts were conducted at the Costa Mesa Starbucks, the adjoining tenant space (currently occupied by a Mendocino Farms) was vacant. 586 138
John Schmid
October 7, 2021

Page 3 ends

O:\0539\memo\Parking Assessment - 2551 E. Vineyard SBUX (10.07.21).docx Table A attached to this memorandum provides a summary of the parking utilization data collected hourly from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. at the Costa Mesa Starbucks over four days (Wednesday through Saturday) in 2013. In review of Table A, the following is noted:
 The 85th percentile of parking demand was calculated to be 17 spaces utilized.

The 85th percentile factor is a commonly used by traffic engineers, for example, in determining the appropriate length of left and right-turn lanes at intersections. By comparison, the Project proposes to provide 20 on-site parking spaces, exceeding the 85th percentile factor from the Costa Mesa Starbucks data.
 There were four instances over the four days of counts (e.g., 9:00 and 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, 8:00 a.m. on Thursday, and 12:00 p.m. on Saturday) when the number of parked vehicles exceeded 20.

It is noted that at the time of the parking survey at the Costa Mesa Starbucks in 2013, Starbucks management had stated this was one of the highest revenue locations in Southern California. Also, as additional Starbucks locations have opened in the vicinity of the Costa Mesa Starbucks since the time of the parking survey, parking demand at the site has been reduced. Thus, the parking demand data can be considered as highly conservative (“worst case”).

Parking Assessment
Based on the parking demand data from the Costa Mesa Starbucks, it can be concluded that the proposed parking supply at the Project would adequately accommodate the parking demand generated at the Project Site. As shown from the Costa Mesa Starbucks data, parking demand is typically 20 vehicles or less throughout the day, which can be readily accommodated by the proposed parking supply at the Project. During unusual peak times when more than 20 vehicles may wish to park at the Project Site, it is expected that this additional demand will be absorbed by the substantial capacity provided by the proposed enhanced drivethrough lane (i.e., incoming motorists will choose to utilize the drive-through instead of walk-in service).

In conclusion, based on the parking demand data provided by an existing Starbucks location, it is expected that the Project will provide sufficient vehicle parking to accommodate the forecast peak demand.
cc: File
587 139
FIGURE 1 SITE PLAN STARBUCKS - 2551 E. VINEYARD AVENUE SOURCE: MCG ARCHITECTURE LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers N 588 140
Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Surplus/Deficiency
March 13, 2013 March 14, 2013 March 15, 2013 March 16, 2013 Maximum (+/-) 15 16 12 7 16 1920 30 17 17 30 525 19 19 13 25 1021 18 17 20 21 1415 11 11 18 18 1714 12 7 23 23 1213 12 10 19 19 1614 10 9 15 15 2012 11 8 11 12 2313 12 9 10 13 22 696 7 9 26
13 6 4 6 13 22
993 6 9 26580 4 8 27120 1 2 33
100 0 1 34
Note:[1] Counts conducted by National Data and Surveying Services (NDS).During the time of the counts 35 spaces were available for parking at 450 E. 17th Street.

Indicates 85th percentile and greater values. The 85th percentile of parked vehicles is calculated to be 17 vehicles.

Indicates peak demand.
10:00 PM
4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM
10:00 AM11:00 AM
12:00 PM
1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM
7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM
TABLE
A
STARBUCKS PARKING SURVEY [1]
Time
589 141

ATTACHMENT
F

REDUCED SIGN PLANS
590 142

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

'UDZLQJ1R
$OO LGHDV SODQV RU DUUDQJHPHQWV LQGLFDWHG
RQWKLVGUDZLQJDUH FRS\ULJKWHG DQGRZQHG
E\6LJQ,QGXVWULHV,QFRUSRUDWHGDQGVKDOOQRW
EHUHSURGXFHGXVHGE\RUGLVFORVHGWRDQ\
SHUVRQVILUPRUFRUSRUDWLRQIRUDQ\SXUSRVH
ZKDWVRHYHU ZLWKRXW ZULWWHQ SHUPLVVLRQ RI
6LJQ,QGXVWULHV,QFRUSRUDWHG
(OHFWULFDO5HTXLUHPHQW

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6
%5,'*(32,17
/21*%($&+
9,1(<$5' 5,9(53$5.67$5%8&.6&2))((
352-(&7

6725(
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

1 9,&,1,7<0$3
1RW7R6FDOH
:$//6,*16/(*(1'
'
$
&
%
´6,5(1,//80,1$7('/2*2',&6
'$<1,7('7&+$11(//(77(56
,//80,1$7('&+$11(//(77(56
'7&+$11(//(77(56
'(6&5,37,216 6T)W 47<

WRWDOVLJQ DUHDSURSRVHG
( '7(175<',5(&7,21$/
) '7(;,7',5(&7,21$/

. 3</216,*1
591 143
63
6,7(3/$1
6&$/(
176
1 ')*(+,
.(</(*(1'
$&%
&/($5$1&(%$5
35(0(18%2$5'
'73$1(/0(186,*1
´6,5(1/2*2',&6
'7(175$1&(',5(&7,21$/
'7(;,77+$1.<28',5(&7,21$/
'7',*,7$/25'(56&5((1
3</216,*1
'7&+$11(//(77(6
&+$11(//(77(56
-
'7&+$11(//(77(56
$%
$%
&'
(*
)
+
,-
.
.
/ 32676,*1
/

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY :HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6
592 144

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6
:(67(/(9$7,21 6&$/(
´ ¶
6287+(/(9$7,21 6&$/(
´ ¶
(/(

&
'

$
%

'
.(</(*(1'
$
&
%
´6,5(1/2*2',&6
'7&+$11(//(77(6
&+$11(//(77(56
'7&+$11(//(77(56
593 145

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6
(/(
1257+(/(9$7,21 6&$/(
´ ¶
($67(/(9$7,21 6&$/(
´ ¶
.(</(*(1'
$
%
´6,5(1/2*2',&6
'7&+$11(//(77(6

$
%

594 146

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

µ,OOXPLQDWHG/RJR'LVF:DOO0RXQWHGa4W\

6FDOH
´ ¶ ,QWHUQDOO\LOOXPLQDWHGORJRGLVFZLWK6ORDQ3ULVP(QOLJKWQHZKLWHNODLGRXWDW PRGXOHVSHUIRRWµRQFHQWHULQVWDOOHGWREDFNRIGLVNZLWKVHOIFRQWDLQHG SRZHUVXSSO\ZLWK8/DSSURYHGHQFORVXUH
' )OXVKHGPRXQWHGWRIDVFLD
PLQLXP

ZLWKPLQLPXPµHPEHGPHQW

'
02817,1*+$5':$5(&+$57
µ%2/767+58:$//
µ/$*6:6+,(/'
µ/$*%2/76
µ72**/(%2/76
0$621$5<
:22'
0(7$/
$
595 147

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

µ'$<1,7('5,9(7+58/(77(56a4W\

6FDOHµ ·µ
¶´
´
;
6LJQPXVWEHDSSURYHGE\WKH1DWLRQDO(OHFWULFDO&RGH8QGHUZULWHUV /DERUDWRU\&8/DQGDOODSSOLFDEOHORFDOFRGHV
'LVFRQQHFWVZLWFKLQSULPDU\WREHZLWKLQVLJKWRIVLJQ VLJQLQFOXGHV
SRZHUVXSSO\HQFORVXUH
5()
1(&>%@
3ULPDU\HOHFWULFDOVRXUFH

PP
FRQGXLWPLQLPXP
5()
1(&

SURYLGHGE\LQVWDOOHU

,QWHUQDOO\LOOXPLQDWHGFKDQQHOOHWWHUVWREHIDEULFDWHGIURP DOXPLQXPZLWKSUHSDLQWHG:KLWHLQWHULRUVDQGSDLQWHG%ODFNSRO\XUHWKDQH H[WHULRUV
PP
GHHS/HWWHUVEDFNVWREH%ODFN :KLWHDOXPLQXPSRS ULYHWHGWRVLGHZDOOVDQGVHDOHG
)DVWHQOHWWHUVIOXVKWRZDOOZLWKUHTXLUHGIDVWHQHUV
$
%
&
'
&
(OHFWULF6LJQ
(QVHLJQH(OHFWULTXH
,VVXH1R(

& 86
,QWHUQDOO\LOOXPLQDWHGZLWK6ORDQ3ULVP(QOLJKWHQZKLWHNODLGRXW PRGXOHVSHUIRRWµRQFHQWHULQVWDOOHGWREDFNRIOHWWHUZLWKVORDQ SRZHUVXSSO\ZLWK8/DSSURYHGFORVXUH
'5,9(7+5863(&,),&$7,21

)DFHVWREHµFOHDUDFU\OLFZLWKEODFNWULPFDS
UHWDLQHUHGJLQJOHWWHUVIDFHWREH0GD\QLWHSHIRUDWHG YLQ\ORYHUOD\ZLWKZKLWH0GLIIXVHUVHFRQGVXUIDFH
% VLJQDUHDVTIW
596 148

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

& µ'$<1,7(&+$11(//(77(56a4W\

6&$/(
µ · $
%
&
'
67$5%8&.663(&,),&$7,21

6LJQPXVWEHDSSURYHGE\WKH1DWLRQDO(OHFWULFDO&RGH8QGHUZULWHUV /DERUDWRU\&8/DQGDOODSSOLFDEOHORFDOFRGHV
'LVFRQQHFWVZLWFKLQSULPDU\WREHZLWKLQVLJKWRIVLJQ VLJQLQFOXGHV
SRZHUVXSSO\HQFORVXUH
5()
1(&>%@
3ULPDU\HOHFWULFDOVRXUFH

PP
FRQGXLWPLQLPXP
5()
1(&

SURYLGHGE\LQVWDOOHU

,QWHUQDOO\LOOXPLQDWHGFKDQQHOOHWWHUVWREHIDEULFDWHGIURP DOXPLQXPZLWKSUHSDLQWHG:KLWHLQWHULRUVDQGSDLQWHG%ODFNSRO\XUHWKDQH H[WHULRUV
PP
GHHS/HWWHUVEDFNVWREH%ODFN :KLWHDOXPLQXPSRS ULYHWHGWRVLGHZDOOVDQGVHDOHG
)DVWHQOHWWHUVIOXVKWRZDOOZLWKUHTXLUHGIDVWHQHUV
&
(OHFWULF6LJQ
(QVHLJQH(OHFWULTXH
,VVXH1R(

& 86
,QWHUQDOO\LOOXPLQDWHGZLWK6ORDQ3ULVP(QOLJKWHQZKLWHNODLGRXW PRGXOHVSHUIRRWµRQFHQWHULQVWDOOHGWREDFNRIOHWWHUZLWKVORDQ SRZHUVXSSO\ZLWK8/DSSURYHGFORVXUH
)DFHVWREHµZKLWHDFU\OLFIDFHVZLWK0'D\1LWHSHUIRUDWHGYLQ\OEODFNWULP FDSUHWDLQHUHGJLQJO
'HVLJQ

)OXVKHGPRXQWHGWRIDVFLD
ZLWKPLQLQXPµODJEROWV
¶´
´
/('/$<287 6FDOH
´ ¶ VLJQDUHDVTIW
597 149

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6
µ'$<1,7('5,9(7+58/(77(56a4W\

6FDOHµ ·µ
;
6LJQPXVWEHDSSURYHGE\WKH1DWLRQDO(OHFWULFDO&RGH8QGHUZULWHUV /DERUDWRU\&8/DQGDOODSSOLFDEOHORFDOFRGHV
'LVFRQQHFWVZLWFKLQSULPDU\WREHZLWKLQVLJKWRIVLJQ VLJQLQFOXGHV
SRZHUVXSSO\HQFORVXUH
5()
1(&>%@
3ULPDU\HOHFWULFDOVRXUFH

PP
FRQGXLWPLQLPXP
5()
1(&

SURYLGHGE\LQVWDOOHU

)DFHVWREHµFOHDUDFU\OLFZLWKEODFNWULPFDS
UHWDLQHUHGJLQJOHWWHUVIDFHWREH0GD\QLWHSHIRUDWHG YLQ\ORYHUOD\ZLWKZKLWH0GLIIXVHUVHFRQGVXUIDFH
'

¶´
´
VLJQDUHDVTIW
598 150

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

')'5,9(7+58',5(&7,21$/6,*16a4W\

6FDOH
´ ¶ 6LGH6WUHHW9LHZ )URQW9LHZ 6WRUH6LGH9LHZ 5HDU9LHZ 'HVLJQ,'
3ULVP(QOLJKWHQZKLWH
./('·V
3RZHU6XSSO\
,QWHUQDOO\LOOXPLQDWHGORJRGLVFZLWK6ORDQ3ULVP(QOLJKWHQZKLWH NODLGRXWDWPRGXOHVSHUIRRWµRQFHQWHU ZLWKVHOIFRQWDLQHGSRZHUVXSSO\ZLWK8/DSSURYHGHQFORVXUH (
599 151

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

6,*1,1'8675,(6,1&
&$/,)251,$

67$5%8&.6'5,9(7+586,*1$*(
',5(&7,21$/6,*1$*(

600 152

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6
')(;,7',5(&7,21$/6,*16a4W\

6FDOH
´ ¶ 6LGH6WUHHW9LHZ )URQW9LHZ 6WRUH6LGH9LHZ 'HVLJQ,'

,QWHUQDOO\LOOXPLQDWHGORJRGLVFZLWK6ORDQ3ULVP(QOLJKWHQZKLWH NODLGRXWDWPRGXOHVSHUIRRWµRQFHQWHU ZLWKVHOIFRQWDLQHGSRZHUVXSSO\ZLWK8/DSSURYHGHQFORVXUH 3ULVP(QOLJKWHQZKLWH
./('·V
3RZHU6XSSO\
5HDU9LHZ
)
601 153

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

6,*1,1'8675,(6,1&
&$/,)251,$

67$5%8&.6'5,9(7+586,*1$*(
',5(&7,21$/6,*1$*(

602 154

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

'HVLJQ,'
)5((67$1',1*'7&/($51$1&(%$5$552:6(5,(6a4W\

6FDOH
´ ¶ )URQW9LHZ 5LJKW9LHZ (QG9LHZ *
603 155

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

604 156

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

'5,9(7+5835(0(186,*1a4W\

6FDOH
´ ¶ ,167$//$7,2121/<
'HVLJQ,'
35(0(186,*1 +
605 157

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

606 158

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

'5,9(7+58',*,7$/25'(53267a4W\

176 +
,167$//$7,2121/<
'HVLJQ,'
607 159

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

'5,9(7+58',*,7$/25'(56&5((1a4W\

,167$//$7,2121/<21 176 'HVLJQ,' ´
´
+
608 160

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

609 161

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6
'5,9(7+583$1(/0(186,*1a4W\

6FDOH
´ ´ ,167$//$7,2121/<
3$1(/0(186,*1 'HVLJQ,'

-
610 162

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

611 163

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6

6LJQ6SHFLÀFDWLRQV

'LVN&DELQHW

6WHHODQJOHIUDPHZLWK´>PP@DOXPLQXP¿OOHUSDLQWHGEODFNWR PDWFK5$/0 6LJQ&RPSUHWUREOHHGÀH[IDFHUHWDLQHUSDLQWHGEODFNWRPDWFK 5$/0 $UHDVXVLQJEODFNSDLQWWRPDWFK5$/0VKDOOKDYHDPD[ JORVVOHYHOPDWFKVDPSOH )OH[LEOHIDFHVXEVWUDWHZLWK¿UVWVXUIDFHDSSOLHG0 +ROO\*UHHQYLQ\O¿OP:KLWHVLUHQWREHZHHGHGRXWRIJUHHQYLQ\O ,QWHULRUDOXPLQXPVXUIDFHVRIVLJQFDELQHWWREHSDLQWHGZKLWHZLWK/DFU\O 6WDUEULWH $OOIDVWHQHUVXVHGLQWKHDVVHPEO\RILQWHUQDOFRPSRQHQWVVKDOOEH FRDWHGWRSUHYHQWFRUURVLRQ ,QWHUQDOVWUXFWXUHRIFDELQHWVKDOOEHSHUDSSURYHGVKRSGUDZLQJV *UDSKLFHOHPHQWVDUHLQWHUQDOO\LOOXPLQDWHGXVLQJ*(7HWUD3RZHUVWULSV '6/('PRGXOHVPRXQWHGRQ*(3RZHUVWULS5DLORSHUDWLQJRII
*(368SRZHUVXSSOLHVLQIDEULFDWHGUDFHZD\VRU6WDUEXFNV DSSURYHGHTXDO$OOHOHFWULFDOFRPSRQHQWVDUHUHPRYDEOHIRUVHUYLFH 7RUVLRQWXEHDVVHPEO\WREHFRQVWUXFWHGRI[[ >PP[PP[PP@VTXDUHVWHHOWXEHZLWK>PP@DOXPLQXP¿OOHU WRSDQGERWWRP$VVHPEO\SDLQWHGEODFNWRPDWFK5$/0 'ULYH7KUX&DELQHW
6WHHODQJOHIUDPHZLWKH[WUXGHGDOXPLQXPUHWDLQHUVDQG´>PP@ DOXPLQXP¿OOHUSDLQWHGEODFNWRPDWFK5$/0 $UHDVXVLQJEODFNSDLQWWRPDWFK5$/0VKDOOKDYHDPD[ JORVVOHYHOPDWFKVDPSOH ´>PP@SLJPHQWHGZKLWHVRODUJUDGHSRO\FDUERQDWHIDFHSDQHOWR PDWFK5 +ZLWK RSDTXHEODFNYLQ\OFRS\DQG FKHYURQVWREHZHHGHGRXW ,QWHULRUDOXPLQXPVXUIDFHVRIVLJQFDELQHWWREHSDLQWHGZKLWHZLWK/DFU\O 6WDUEULWH $OOIDVWHQHUVXVHGLQWKHDVVHPEO\RILQWHUQDOFRPSRQHQWVVKDOOEH FRDWHGWRSUHYHQWFRUURVLRQ ,QWHUQDOVWUXFWXUHRIFDELQHWVKDOOEHSHUDSSURYHGVKRSGUDZLQJV *UDSKLFHOHPHQWVDUHLQWHUQDOO\LOOXPLQDWHGXVLQJ*(7HWUD3RZHUVWULSV '6/('PRGXOHVPRXQWHGRQ*(3RZHUVWULS5DLORSHUDWLQJRII

*(36SRZHUVXSSO\LQIDEULFDWHGUDFHZD\RU6WDUEXFNVDSSURYHG HTXDO$OOHOHFWULFDOFRPSRQHQWVDUHUHPRYDEOHIRUVHUYLFH 6XSSRUW

6XSSRUWLQJVWUXFWXUHZLOOEHDOOZHOGHGVWHHOWXEHSLSHFKDQQHODQG SODWHFRQVWUXFWLRQSDLQWHGEODFNWRPDWFK5$/0DVSHUDSSURYHG VKRSGUDZLQJV %DVHSODWHZLOOEHFRQVWUXFWHGVRWKDWLWFDQEHUHWUR¿WWDEOHWRH[LVWLQJ VLJQIRXQGDWLRQV$OOIRXQGDWLRQVH[LVWLQJDQGQHZPXVWEHDQDO\]HGIRU VXLWDELOLW\DQGPXVWPHHWDOOORFDOFLW\RUVWDWHFRGHVUHJXODWLRQV 5HJXODWRU\

6LJQPXVWPHHWDOOUHJXODWLRQVLQWKH1DWLRQDO(OHFWULF&RGHDVZHOODV DQ\ORFDORUVWDWHHOHFWULFDOFRGHV $VSHU1(&VLJQLVHTXLSSHGZLWKDVHUYLFHGLVFRQQHFWVZLWFK 6LJQPXVWEHOLVWHGDVDQ(OHFWULF6LJQSHU8QGHUZULWHUV/DERUDWRULHV 8/DQGRU&6$DQGEHDUWKHDSSURSULDWH8/&8/RU&6$UHOHYDQW FHUWL¿FDWLRQPDUNV 3ULPDU\SRZHUE\HOHFWULFDOFRQWUDFWRUSHU1(& 7KHVH'UDZLQJVDQG6SHFL¿FDWLRQVDUHFRQ¿GHQWLDODQGVKDOOUHPDLQWKH VROHSURSHUW\RI6WDUEXFNV&RUSRUDWLRQZKLFKLVWKHRZQHURIWKHFRS\ULJKW LQWKLVZRUN7KH\VKDOOQRWEHUHSURGXFHG
LQZKROHRULQSDUW
VKDUHGZLWK
WKLUGSDUWLHVRUXVHGLQDQ\PDQQHURQRWKHUSURMHFWVRUH[WHQVLRQVWRWKLV SURMHFWZLWKRXWWKHSULRUZULWWHQFRQVHQWRI6WDUEXFNV&RUSRUDWLRQ 7KLVGUDZLQJLVD'HVLJQ'HYHORSPHQW'RFXPHQW6LWHVSHFL¿FPRGL¿FDWLRQV PDGHXQGHUWKHUHVSRQVLEOHFKDUJHRIWKH$UFKLWHFWDQGRU(QJLQHHURI 5HFRUGZLOOEHUHTXLUHGSULRUWRXVLQJWKLVGRFXPHQWIRU%LGGLQJ3HUPLWWLQJ RU&RQVWUXFWLRQ
0
'HVLJQ,'
9ROWV $PSV 6T)W 6L]H 6T)W

PP

)LJXUHGDVLOOXPLQDWHGDUHD

)LJXUHGDVFRPSOHWHVLJQDJH
)URQW(OHYDWLRQ9LHZ 6LGH9LHZ
9HUWLFDO&URVV6HFWLRQ9LHZ7\S
5HDU9LHZ
*(368SRZHUVXSSO\LQ
IDEULFDWHGUDFHZD\W\SRUHTXDO
*(36SRZHUVXSSO\LQ
IDEULFDWHGUDFHZD\W\SRUHTXDO
*(7HWUD3RZHUVWULS'6/('PRGXOH
RQ3RZHUVWULSUDLO

RU6WDUEXFNVDSSURYHGHTXDO
*(7HWUD3RZHUVWULS'6/('PRGXOH
RQ3RZHUVWULSUDLO

RU6WDUEXFNVDSSURYHGHTXDO /LTXLG7LJKWULJLGFRQGXLW
+LQJHGDFFHVVSDQHO
IRUVHUYLFH
ERWKVLGHV

:HDWKHUSURRIGLVFRQQHFW
VZLWFKZLWKVHDOLQJERRW
:HDWKHUSURRIGLVFRQQHFW
VZLWFKZLWKVHDOLQJERRW

>PP@

>PP@
>PP@

>
PP@

'LD>PP@

>PP@

>PP@

> PP@

>PP@
´>PP@SLJPHQWHGZKLWH6*SRO\FDUERQDWHIDFH
SDQHOWRPDWFK5 +ZLWK RSDTXH
EODFNYLQ\OFRS\DQGFKHYURQVWREHZHHGHGRXW
0
3$,17(;,67,1*3,3(%/$&.
720$7&+5$/0
6WHHOSLSH
6WHHODQJOHIUDPHZLWK6LJQ&RPSÀDWEOHHGUHWURIUDPH DQG>PP@DOXPLQXP¿OOHUSDLQWHGEODFNWRPDWFK 5$/0PDWFKVDPSOH
6WHHODQJOHIUDPHZLWKH[WUXGHGDOXPLQXPUHWDLQHUVDQG
>PP@DOXPLQXP¿OOHUSDLQWHGEODFNWRPDWFK
5$/0PDWFKVDPSOH
6WHHOWRUVLRQWXEHDVVHPEO\SDLQWHGEODFNWRPDWFK
5$/0PDWFKVDPSOH
)OH[LEOHIDFHVXEVWUDWHZLWK¿UVWVXUIDFHDSSOLHG0 +ROO\*UHHQYLQ\O¿OP:KLWHVLUHQWREHZHHGHGRXWRI JUHHQYLQ\O
6WHHOSLSHW\SSDLQWHGEODFNWRPDWFK
5$/0PDWFKVDPSOH

>PP@

>PP@

>PP@

>PP@

>PP@
:HDWKHUSURRIGLVFRQQHFWVZLWFKZLWKVHDOLQJERRW
6T)W

1(:/2*2$1'&$%,1(7)25(;,67,1*32/( . 47<

6FDOH

612 164

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6
1HZ6SHF$XJXVW

613 165

&DUULOOR3ULYDGR2QWDULR&$

)D[

(PDLO
GHVLJQ#VLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
:HE
ZZZVLJQLQGXVWULHVWY
3DJH

/RFDWLRQ

'DWH

6DOHV5HS

&OLHQW$SSURYDO

3URMHFW

'DWHRI$SSURYDO

'UDZQE\

9ROWV 9ROWV
3DXO/
/6
(9LQH\DUG$YH
2[QDUG&$

/6

/6
',5(&7%85,$/'(7$,/
32676,*1 /
6FDOH
µ · 72%($/80,1803$1(/6:,7+5$',86&251(56
$1'3$,17(':+,7(6(0,*/266),1,6+
3$1(/

63(&,),&$7,216

&23<$552:6
72%($33/,(':+,7(23$48(9,1</
127(6
67$5%8&.6*(1(5$/&2175$&725
*&
:,//3529,'(
$1',167$//3$5.,1*32/(3(5127('6,7(3/$1

47<

614 166

ATTACHMENT
G
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XX
(MAJOR MODIFICATION TO U-916)
615 167
RESOLUTION NO. 2021 - XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
OXNARD APPROVING PLANNING AND ZONING PERMIT NO. 21-550-01 (MAJOR MODIFICATION TO U-916 (SPECIAL USE PERMIT)) TO ALLOW FOR MODIFICATIONS TO AN EXISTING 2,450 SQUARE-FOOT

DRIVE-THROUGH FAST FOOD RESTAURANT BUILDING AND TO
ALLOW FOR A 2,500 SQUARE-FOOT STARBUCKS DRIVE-THROUGH
COFFEE SHOP ON A 0.66 ACRE PROJECT SITE AND ADMINISTRATIVE

PARKING RELIEF TO DECREASE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FROM 50 TO 35 (INCLUDING 15 SPACES WHICH ARE PROVIDED VIA THE DRIVE-THROUGH QUEUE) AND TO ALLOW FOR 11 COMPACT PARKING SPACES, LOCATED AT 2551 NORTH VINEYARD AVENUE (APN:
132-0-043-215), SUBJECT TO CERTAIN FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS.

FILED BY BEVERLY METZ, OF STARBUCKS, (APPLICANT) 555 ANTON BOULEVARD, COSTA MESA, CA 92626.

WHEREAS, on February 12, 2021, Jennifer Cribbs (the “Applicant” and/or “Permittee”) submitted a request to allow for modifications to an existing 2,450 square-foot drive-through fast food restaurant building to allow for a Starbucks drive-through coffee shop on a 0.66 acre site. The proposed improvements will consist of a small addition, facade changes, revised signage, upgraded landscaping, new parking lot striping, drive-through lane modification to allow for an extended queuing lane to allow for a maximum capacity of 16 vehicles. The request also includes a request for a parking modification to allow for a reduction in the amount of required parking from 50 parking spaces to 35 parking spaces, including 15 spaces which are provided via the drive-through queue. The parking modification will also allow for 11 of the parking spaces to be compact parking spaces. The project includes a Transportation Demand Management Plan. The project is located in the General Commercial Planned Development (C-2-PD) zone at 2551 North Vineyard Avenue (APN: 132-0-043-215); and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Oxnard (“Planning Commission”) conducted a duly noticed public hearing, and received and reviewed all written and oral evidence related to the proposed Project, to consider the Applicant’s request to approve Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification) to allow for modifications to an existing 2,450 square foot drive-through fast food restaurant building to allow for a Starbucks coffee shop on a 0.66 acre site (the “Project”), in accordance with Section 16-561 of the Oxnard City Code (OCC) and to allow for a parking modification to allow for 1) a reduction in the amount of required parking from 50 parking spaces to 35 parking spaces, including 15 spaces which are provided via the drive-through queue, and 2) a parking modification to allow for 11 of the parking spaces to be compact parking spaces in accordance with Section 16-651 of the OCC; and WHEREAS, Sections 16-561, 16-651(B)(3) and 16-651(B)(4) of the OCC authorize the Planning Commission to approve a Major Modification and relief from parking requirements; and 616 168
Resolution No. 2021-XX (PZ 21-550-01; Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations) Planning Commission Date: November 4, 2021

Page 2 of 24 ends

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds, after due study, deliberation and public hearing, that the project meets the criteria set out in Sections 16-651(B)(3) and 16-651(B)(4) of the OCC; and
WHEREAS, the Project has been reviewed by the Development Advisory Committee (DAC) and the DAC has prepared conditions of approval that are incorporated within the recommended permits; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Project conforms to the City of Oxnard 2030 General Plan elements thereof and the Oxnard City Code for the reasons set forth in the Planning Commission Staff Report; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Environmental Services Division has completed a preliminary environmental assessment of the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and determined that the Project is subject to a Class 1 Categorical Exemption (Section 15301). Further, the project does not trigger any of the Exceptions to the Exemptions (15300.2):

A. Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located. A project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply to all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.

The project site has a 2030 General Plan land use designation of Commercial General and is in the General Commercial - Planned Development (C-2-PD) zoning designation. The project is currently developed with an existing fast food drive-through restaurant and is surrounded by other commercial and residential urban development. The project site and adjacent sites do not contain any known environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern. Therefore, the project will have no impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern.

B. Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant.

The existing development consists of a drive-through fast food restaurant. The proposed development would intensify the use and modify the operational characteristics of the existing development to allow the proposed drive-through coffee shop, but the project also includes site modifications which are intended to improve the site conditions including circulation and aesthetics. As such, the proposed Project is consistent with the 2030 General Plan and Oxnard City Code and is compatible with the physical scale and character of allowable development in the project area. Any projects requiring discretionary approval would be analyzed with the General Plan and the Oxnard City Code for consistency and CEQA for any potential impacts. Therefore, the project will have no significant 617 169
Resolution No. 2021-XX (PZ 21-550-01; Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations) Planning Commission Date: November 4, 2021

Page 3 of 24 ends

cumulative impact.

C. Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

The existing development consists of a drive-through fast food restaurant. The proposed development would intensify the use and modify the operational characteristics of the existing development to allow the proposed drive-through coffee shop, but the project also includes site modifications which are intended to improve the site conditions including circulation and aesthetics. The proposed site improvements will not result in an unusual circumstance that would cause the project to have a significant effect on the environment. The Project will not alter the urban development (commercial and residential) character of the surrounding development and the property does not contain any unusual environmental characteristics as the property will be surrounded on all sides by commercial and residential development. Therefore, the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.

D. Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements, which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.

The Project is not located in or adjacent to a state designated scenic highway.

E. Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site, which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

The proposed project site is not included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.

F. Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project, which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

The project site does not contain an existing or potential landmark, point of interest, or historic resource, and it is not located within an existing, proposed, or potential Historic District. Therefore, the proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds after due study and deliberation that the that the applicant agrees with the necessity of and accepts all elements, requirements, and conditions of this Resolution as being a reasonable manner of preserving, protecting, 618 170
Resolution No. 2021-XX (PZ 21-550-01; Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations) Planning Commission Date: November 4, 2021

Page 4 of 24 ends

providing for, and fostering the health, safety, and welfare of the citizenry in general and the persons who work, visit or live in this development in particular. .

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF OXNARD:

SECTION 1. Based on the entire record before the Planning Commission and all written and oral evidence presented, including the Special Use Permit Staff Report and all attachments thereto, the Planning Commission finds:

1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and other adopted policies of the City of Oxnard.

As described in the Staff Report, the existing development consists of a drive-through fast food restaurant. The proposed development would intensify the use and modify the operational characteristics of the existing development to allow the proposed drive-through coffee shop. The Project is within the General Commercial Planned Development (C-2-PD) zone district which is consistent with the 2030 General Plan land use designation of Commercial General.

As discussed in detail in the Planning Commission Staff Report Sections b, c, d, e, f, and g, the Project, as designed and conditioned, meets all applicable development standards with the approval of the Administrative Parking Relief under OCC 16-651(B)(3), “Compact parking spaces” to allow for 11 of the required parking spaces to be compact spaces, and OCC 16-651(B)(4), “Decrease in required parking spaces” to reduce the number of required parking spaces.

The new business and associated improvements does not change the land use of the subject site. The project site is not subject to a Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed project is in compliance with the 2030 General Plan and other adopted policies of the City of Oxnard and meets this Finding.

2. The nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures shall be considered, and no proposed Special Use Permit shall be granted if the approval body finds such use will adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings or structures or to the public health, safety or general welfare.

As described in the Staff Report, pursuant to the 2030 General Plan land use designation “Commercial General” and the General Commercial - Planned Development (C-2 PD) zoning district, the proposed use of the project site as a drive-through coffee shop, is an allowed use, subject to a Special Use Permit. The surrounding uses are characterized by commercial uses, which are predominantly commercial centers, other drive-through facilities serving food products, and residential uses. Construction activities, anticipated uses, and development design will be subject to standard construction requirements of the Building, Fire, and Traffic Codes. Additionally, the redesign of the Project and the included conditions of approval, will minimize the potential for impacts to adjacent roadways and properties. 619 171
Resolution No. 2021-XX (PZ 21-550-01; Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations) Planning Commission Date: November 4, 2021

Page 5 of 24 ends

Therefore, the proposed use and improvements, as conditioned, will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings or structures or to the public health, safety or general welfare.

3. The site that is subject to the Special Use Permit shall be adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping, and items which may be required by Section 16-532 (Conditions).

As described in the Staff Report, the project as designed and conditioned meets the development standards of the General Commercial Planned Development (C2-PD) zone as described above in Finding Section 1(1). The Project will result in an overall increase in onsite landscaping, with the landscaping increasing from 22.8 percent of the site to 26.4 percent. The majority of the new landscaping will be installed along North Vineyard Avenue, a designated scenic corridor which requires a landscaped buffer of at least 30 feet. The existing parking lot is located within this 30-foot area and is considered to be a “legal nonconforming” existing condition. The drive-through queue will be located within this 30-foot paved area, but paved areas will be removed and additional landscaping is proposed to be installed on both linear sides of the drive-through queue within the 30-foot area. This new landscaping will bring the project site more into compliance with the General Plan’s 30-foot wide landscape buffer standard. The revised site landscaping will provide parkways and landscape areas throughout the parking lot that will feature low water use, native and regionally adapted plants including grasses, succulents, and trees. Additionally, 8 trees will be added throughout the property, which will assist in meeting the requirement of 1 tree for every 40 feet of property line. As such, the subject site is adequate in terms of size and as developed the development meets or exceeds City’s design standards.

4. The site that is subject to the Special Use Permit shall be served by highways adequate in width and improved as necessary to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use will generate.

As described in the Staff Report, the existing development consists of a drive-through fast food restaurant. The proposed development would intensify the use and modify the operational characteristics of the existing development to allow the proposed drive-through coffee shop. The Project site is and will be accessed from Riverpark Boulevard via the existing driveways. The City’s Traffic Engineer finds that the proposed project, as conditioned, and in the context of the documentation provided and reviewed demonstrate that there is sufficient vehicle queue and parking capacity.

The project has provided and been conditioned to implement a Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDMP) that identifies how the internal circulation of the site shall be managed, back-ups are avoided, and conflicting turning movements are to be avoided with the introduction of the new business operations. Therefore, the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in size and existing intersections adjacent to the project site will operate at acceptable levels of service.

5. The site that is subject to the Special Use Permit shall be provided with adequate sewerage, water, fire protection and storm drainage facilities. 620 172
Resolution No. 2021-XX (PZ 21-550-01; Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations) Planning Commission Date: November 4, 2021

Page 6 of 24 ends

As described in the Staff Report, the existing development consists of a drive-through fast food restaurant. The proposed development would intensify the use and modify the operational characteristics of the existing development to allow the proposed drive-through coffee shop. The proposed Project improvements have been found to be consistent with anticipated development for this site. Furthermore, the Project will be served by existing City of Oxnard water and sewer mains and adequate Fire Protection will be provided as determined by the Development Advisory Committee.

In accordance with the Stormwater Quality Conditions of this Resolution, the Project’s design will comply with stormwater control measures as required by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board’s municipal separate storm sewer system (“MS4”) permit. The Project is consistent with the level of development identified under the General Plan and Oxnard City Code, and therefore are within the anticipated level of development. The project is not anticipated to result in any significant impacts to utilities and public services. Therefore, the site for the proposed use will be provided with adequate sewage, water, fire protection and storm drainage facilities.

SECTION 2. The Planning Commission, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), determines that the Project will not have a significant impact on the environment and is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15301 (Class 1) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The Project involves a request to convert an existing drive-through fast food restaurant to a drive-through coffee shop. The small addition will only increase the building size by 50 square feet or approximately 2 percent, and will be within the existing developed area. Onsite circulation will be improved through the realignment of the drive-through lane. This will work to prevent impacts to adjacent roadways. In addition, to the design improvements a Transportation Demand Management Plan will be implemented for the site to prevent vehicles from backing-up into adjacent roadways. As a result, this Project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, or air quality. The Planning Commission has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and no Exceptions to the Exemptions (Section 15300.2) apply to defeat the Exemption. The Planning & Environmental Services Manager is hereby authorized and directed to file a Notice of Exemption with the Ventura County Clerk pursuant to Section 15602 of the State CEQA Guidelines within five (5) working days of passage, approval and adoption of this Resolution.

SECTION 3. Based on the findings set forth herein and the Staff Report and all attachments thereto, the Planning Commission hereby approves Planning and Zoning Permit No. 21-550-01 (Major Modification), subject to the attached conditions of approval.

SECTION 4. The decision of the Planning Commission shall be final unless an appeal of the action is filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 16-545 of the Oxnard City Code.

SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. 621 173
Resolution No. 2021-XX (PZ 21-550-01; Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations) Planning Commission Date: November 4, 2021

Page 7 of 24 ends

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Note: The abbreviations below identify the City department or division responsible for determining compliance with these standard conditions. The first department or division listed has responsibility for compliance at plan check, the second during inspection and the third at final inspection, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, or at a later date, as specified in the condition. If more than one department or division is listed, the first will check the plans or inspect the project before the second confirms compliance with the condition. The italicized code at the end of each condition provides internal information on the source of each condition: Some are standard permit conditions (e.g. G-1) while some are taken from environmental documents (e.g. MND-S2).

DEPARTMENTS AND DIVISIONS
CA City Attorney PL Planning
DS Dev Services/Eng Dev/Inspectors TR Traffic
PD Police B Building Plan Checker
SC Source Control FD Fire
PK Landscape Design CE Code Enforcement

GENERAL PROJECT CONDITIONS

1. This permit is granted for the property described in the application on file with the Planning Division, and may not be transferred from one property to another. (PL, G-1).

2. This permit is granted for the plans dated November 4, 2021, (“the plans”) on file with the Planning Division. The Project shall conform to the plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions, or unless a Minor Modification to the plans is approved by the Planning and Environmental Services Manager (“Planning Manager”) or a Major Modification to the plans is approved by the Planning Commission. A Minor Modification may be granted for minimal changes or increases in the extent of use or size of structures or of the design, materials or colors of structures or masonry walls. A Major Modification shall be required for substantial changes or increases in such items (PL, G-2).

3. This permit shall automatically become null and void 36 months from the date of its issuance, unless Developer has diligently developed the proposed project, as shown by the issuance of a grading, foundation, or building permit and the construction of substantial improvements (PL, G-3).
622 174
Resolution No. 2021-XX (PZ 21-550-01; Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations) Planning Commission Date: November 4, 2021

Page 8 of 24 ends

4. All required off-site and on-site improvements for the project, including structures, paving, and landscaping, shall be completed prior to occupancy unless the Development Services Manager allows Developer to provide security or an executed agreement approved by the City Attorney to ensure completion of such improvements. (DS, G-4)

5. By commencing any activity related to the Project or using any structure authorized by this permit, Applicant accepts all of the conditions and obligations imposed by this permit and waives any challenge to the validity of the conditions and obligations stated therein (CA, G-5).

6. Applicant agrees, as a condition of adoption of this resolution, at Applicant’s own expense, to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees from and against any claim, action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void or annul the approval of the resolution or any condition attached thereto or any proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done or made prior to the approval of such resolution that were part of the approval process (CA, G-6).

7. Any covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) applicable to the Project property shall be consistent with the terms of this permit and the City Code. If there is a conflict between the CC&Rs and the City Code or this permit, the City Code or this permit shall prevail (CA, G-7).

8. Applicant shall complete the “Notice of Land Use Restrictions and Conditions” form, using the form provided by the City, for recording with the Ventura County Recorder.

Before the City issues building permits, Applicant shall submit the original completed, signed and notarized document, together with the required fees to the Planning Manager (PL, G-8).

10. Before placing or constructing any signs on the Project property, Applicant shall obtain a sign permit from the City. Except as provided in the sign permit, Applicant may not change any signs on the Project property (PL/B, G-10).

11. Developer shall obtain a building permit for any new construction or modifications to structures, including interior modifications, authorized by this permit. (B, G-11)

12. Developer shall not permit any combustible refuse or other flammable materials to be burned on the project property. (FD, G-12)

13. Developer shall not permit any materials classified as flammable, combustible, radioactive, carcinogenic or otherwise potentially hazardous to human health to be handled, stored or used on the project property, except as provided in a permit issued by the Fire Chief. (FD, G-13)

14. If Developer, owner or tenant fails to comply with any of the conditions of this permit, the Developer, owner or tenant shall be subject to a civil fine pursuant to the City Code. (CA, G-14)
623 175
Resolution No. 2021-XX (PZ 21-550-01; Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations) Planning Commission Date: November 4, 2021

Page 9 of 24 ends

15. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall correct all violations of the City Code existing on the project property for which the Code Compliance Division has open cases. (PL, G-15).

LANDSCAPE STANDARD CONDITIONS

16. Prior to submittal of landscape and irrigation plans, Developer shall obtain approval of the Planning Manager or designee of a plan showing on the project property all existing trees and identifying the trees to be saved, transplanted or removed. (PK, PK-1)

17. Prior to issuance of building permits or the proposed use is initiated, whichever comes first, Developer shall submit two copies of landscape and irrigation plans, along with the appropriate permit application and fees, to the Development Services Division and obtain approval of such plans. (PK/DS, PK-2)

18. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, Developer shall install landscape and automatic irrigation systems that have been approved by Parks and Facilities Superintendent. (PK, PK-3)

19. Developer shall properly maintain landscape planting and all irrigation systems as required by the City Code and as specified by this permit. Failure of Developer to do so may result in the revocation of this permit and initiation of legal proceedings against Developer to ensue compliance (PK, PK-4)

20. Prior to the issuance of City issues a certificate of occupancy, Developer shall provide a watering schedule to the building owner or manager and to Planning Division or designee.

The irrigation system shall include automatic rain shut-off devices, or instructions on how to override the irrigation system during rainy periods. (PK, PK-5)

21. All trees planted or placed on the property by Developer shall be at least 24-inch-box size.

All shrubs and vines shall be at least five-gallon size, except as otherwise specified by this permit. (PK, PK-6)

22. At the time of landscape plan check submittal, the landscape planting and irrigation plans shall comply with the current title 23 Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO). (PK, PK-7.1)

23. Developer shall install an irrigation system that includes a water sensor shut off device as a water conservation measure. (PK, PK-22)

24. At time of submittal to the Building and Engineering Division for plan check, Developer’s Landscape Architect or Architect shall provide the City with written confirmation that they have reviewed the civil engineering construction drawings and that the NPDES requirements are not in conflict with meeting the City’s landscape requirements. (PK, PK-23)

25. Developer shall include a note on the Landscape Plans submitted to the Building and Engineering Division for a building permit that “all landscaping and irrigation comply with Ordinance No. 2822, which adopted the City of Oxnard Landscape Water Conservation Standards, and applicable water conservation requirements of the State of California”. (PK, PK-24)
624 176
Resolution No. 2021-XX (PZ 21-550-01; Vineyard Starbucks Site Renovations) Planning Commission Date: November 4, 2021

Page 10 of 24 ends

Oxnard City CouncilMarch 15, 2022

Oxnard City Council
March 15, 2022